Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08-07-1990
r.,... AGENDA 6 CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL August 7. 1990 I Ylork Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday. August 7. 1990, at 4:00 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which thu following items will be considered: i`ote. aAny lso be considered thasAgpart ofr the Aq nda s fore may Regular Meeting. 4:00 p.m. 1, stati Budget Presentations 4:00 - 4:15 A. introduction j 4;13 _ 5:00 B. City Services } General Government/Coda Enforcement Legal Municipal Judge Planning and Development , 5:15 - 6:00 C. Public safety Polic rice J f ~ I1 6:00 - 6:45 D. Municipal services municipal services/Economic Development ' Quest Library Environmental Services Parks and Recreation/Building operations Personnel/Pay Plan/Benefits f 6:45 - 7:15 E. Engineering. Transportation and Airport streets J Airport 7:15 - 8:00 F. sanitation/Equipment Services Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, ; therst llowing August 215 E 90, at 0 Dep.m. in the nton, TexasC at ncwhiilchChambe Nall. items will be considered: 8:00 p.m. i ' 4 4 ~ l Yl'M~ `I . t City of Denton City Council Agenda August 7, 1990 Page 2 19the 90 and regular 19, of 1. cr:onsider essions ofppJune l 5,of 1990 Band minutes special call session of June 26, 1990. 2, Receive an update from Pc. Roland Vela regarding the Texas Municipal Power Agency. 0. 3, Receive a citizen report from Donald Cox regarding the Outreach Library program at the Martin Luther King, Jr. Recreation Center. 4, Receive a citizen report from Reginald Jackson regarding the Outreach Library program at the Martin Luther King, Jr. Recreation Center. 5, Consent Agenda Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in I~ accordance with the Staff recommendations. Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for payment under the ordinance section of the j agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the f ordinances (Agenda items 6.A, 6.B, 6.C). This listing is Members to 1 discuss provided on the Consent Agenda t allow any item prior to pprovalof the ordinance. A. Bids and Purchase orders: 1. Bid 01125 - Hydraulic Torque Machine 2, P.O. 098902 - J & S Equipment 3, P.O. #98905 - Rone Engineers 4. Bid #1014 - White Glove B. Tax Refunds 1 1. Consider approval of a tax refund for Harold R. Gore. 2. Consider approval of a tax refund for Penders Music Store. i ll F ~Y t" K1 F v f. City of Denton Clty Council Agenda August 7, 1990 Page 3 6, Ordinances A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing purchase forofthemat raward of contracts for the equipment, supplies or services. (4.A.1. - Bid 01125) vsaf B. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. (4.A.2 - e.0. 098902, 4.A.3. - P.O. #98905) I C. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the execution of a change order to a contract between )or aity of increase tin the contract priced p(4 Aa4n9 f Bid 01014) h ' D. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending ~ Section 11 of the franchise granted to Lone Star Gas Company by Ordinance No 82-56 to provide for an amended franchise fee to be paid by Lone Star f Gas Company for the use of the public attests. (Third Reading) E. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending Article 1 of Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas (thee tri a Code") 1990 National { to provide for adoption Electrical Code and adoption of anend ents to fthe or National Electrical Code; tt provide f additions thereto; repealing all ordinances in conflict herewith; and providing for a penalty in the amount of $2,000.00 for violations therefor. I (The Electrical Code board recommends approval.) I 1 F. Consider adoption of an ordinance' prohibiting the parking of vehicles on both sides of Ponder Street from its intersection with Panhandle Street to a point 200 feet north o i intersection; providing a severability clause, providing a penalty not to exceed two hundred y dollars. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends approval.) G, Consider adoption of an ordinance amending the i' fees for sign permits to provide for an annual I too for signs required by the State to be permitted. 1 .:a I RfWY~ it 1 4 ~p { a 4 City of Denton City Council Agenda August 7, 1990 Page 4 It. Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas, approving the 1990 tax rolls. 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a compromise settlement release and dismissal of all pending and future claims for pending litigation between the City of Denton and Lary Morris, of al. J. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a compromise settlement release and dismissal with prejudice of all pending and future claims for pending litigation between the City of Denton and Laura Richardson et al. K. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for { the purchase of real property from Lillian Irene Quesenberry. L. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement between the City of Denton and Alan Plumver and Associates, Inc. for professional engineering services, and approving the expenditure of funds therefor. (The PUblic Utilities Board recommends approval.) 7. Resolutions A. Consider approval of a resolution temporarily closing the 100 block of North Elm Street, the 100 block of West Oak Street, the 100 block of North Locust Street and the 100 block of West Hickory Street on September 15, 1990. B. Consider approval of a resolution appointing Tom Harpooi to the Board of Directors of the Texas Municipal Power Agency. C. Consider approval of a resolution assigning a portion of its authority to issue single family housing bonds to Denton County, Texas and 1 resolving other matters in connection therewith. D. Consider approval of a resolution of the City of Denton, Texas, expressing its intent to contract to pv-!hase from the Upper Trinity Regional Water Distt.jt a portion of the raw water obtained from the Sulphur River Basin by the District by contract with the City of Commerce. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) I I , r i i f E r City of Denton city Council Agenda August 7, 1990 Page 5 E. Consider epproval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement between the soOE Denton lid waste and disposal University se vice, of (The Texas for City Utilities Board recommends approval.) 8. Submission of the effective tax rate and rollback tax rate. 1 E 9. Submission of the certified collection rata. i 10. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. 3 i 11. Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate i ~ i C. Personnel ' D. Board Appointments 12. New Business: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 13. Executive Session: 1 l A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 f V.A.T.S. low 1. Consider action in In Re: F I B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 ! V.A.T.S. j I C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. i NOTE: THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO j EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT 16 LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE. C E R T I F I C A T E 1 certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the Cia~y of Denton, o clock on the day of 1990 I (a.m.) (p.m.) i I CITY SECRETARY I 32820 i ~lpri I it II! CITY COUNCIL r~y 111111 -H- Fl 11 161 L 1 I 44 ~aoooo mo ~ I 0 of o~ QT ar a E QOCduGO~ 1 1 I f rM ry CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES / JUNE 5, 1990 I The Council convened into the Work Session at 5:15 p.m, in the Civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry: Mayor Pro Tem Boyd: Council Members Alexander, Ayer, Gorton, Hopkins and Trent. ~ ABSENT: None 1. The council convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters (considered action in In Re: Flow, considered action on claim of John Hawley, considereS acL on in Conover vs. City, considered action in Kelsoe et, al, cons ere action in Champ ion ve~City), real estate, and personnel/board appointments e13 a discussion and considered appointments to all City of Denton Boards and Commissions). Council Member Hopkins left the meeting during the discussion of In Re; Flow. 1 2. The Council received and discussed a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission concerning the formation of a Zoning Ordinance 'cask Force. ; t . Jq Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that this was the recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commtssion. The Commission was srlgesting a task force of not more than 20 members, with a broad geographic and area of interest representation, I Council Member Hopkins stated that she would not have a problem if the Commission could find a way to be representative and yet have a smaller group. I Council Member Ayer asked Robbins how long this project might i take, Robbins replied a year or two. Parts of the ordinance could be done one at a time such as the Planned Development section. Council Member Alexander was not in favor of doing the 10 ordinance in parts but rather would do it as a whole. After discussion regarding the suggestion of names from the Planning and Zoning Commission, consensus of Council was that the Planning and Zoning Commission would make suggestions for individuals to serve on the task force and the Council would add individuals if desired. The ultimate decision for membnre on the task force would be by the City Council. , k ; ICI yNwr.tlMt..~ 1 R6[` ~ t City of Denton City Council Minutes June 5, 1990 Page 2 3. The Council received and discussed it submittal to the Department of Housing and Urban Development regarding a final statement of objectives and projected use of funds with appropriate certifications. Curtis Ramsey, Chair-Human Services Committee, stated that suggestions for the projected use of funds had been included in the Council backup. (Exhibit A). As the material had been discussed at an earlier meeting, Ramsey asked if there were any questions from the Council Members. Council Member Alexander asked for an update on the proposed MLX after school ;action site. Ramsey stated that some of the suggestions such as decentralization of the scholarships to other sites were not feasible due to several reasons, two of which were: (1) some of the action sites were already at maximum in terms of registration and waiting list and this would displace youngsters already signed up to pay the full tuition and (2) transportation problems. Council Member Trent asked if block grant funds were HUD funds and that no City of Denton dollars were inv,)lved. Ramsey replied yes. Council Member Alexander stated that he felt the consensus of the Council from the previous meeting was to attempt to expand the after school action site program scholarship availability. Council wanted to see more money put into scholarships to make certain that low/moderate income children in all of the school sites had an increased access to the program. He felt that perhaps the expansion of the scholarships might be a budget issue for the next fiscal year. 4. The Council was to receive and discuss the revised I'I pity Council budget priorities questionnaire. This item was not considered during the Work Session but was held for the regular session under the City Manager's items. The Council then convened into the Regular Session at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberryi Mayor Pro Tem Boyd; Council Members Alexander, Ayer, Gorton, Hopkins and Trent. ASSENT: None a i ' I A y City of Denton city council minutes ! r..,... June 5, 1990 r Page 3 I Item #2 was considered, 2. Presentation of the Texas Water Commission Operation and Maintenance Excellence Award. Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, presented the award to the members of the Utilities Department from the Wastewater Treatment Plant, He stated that the award was for quality operation and maintenance of the Pecan Creek rz;* hQclamation Plant. The City had been in competition with all the plants in Texas and was selected as the best operated and maintained plant for plants over 10 million gallons a day of capacity. 3. Presentation of Yard of the Month Awards. Mayor Castleberry presented the following Yard of the month awards for June: Leon Bingman James McReynolds Donald and Carmen Howard Gene and Rebecca Meyer 1 Andrea and Neal Slater I 4. The Council received a citizen report from Becky Kroll regarding the Parkway Children's Memorial Greenspace. Ms. Kroll stated that the greenspace project was a memorial for five children of the England family who were killed in a car accident. The children lived on Parkway in a house on the proposed site. She stated that there were four objectives they were working for: (1) to raise money to purchase the property of the house where the children lived, donate the property to the City and create a memorial greenspace, (2) improve public ` safety on a corner where many accidents occurred, (3) / beautification of the City, and (4) create a permanent fund in the name of the children to help battered and abused children. She asked for a resolution of support from the Council regarding their project. 51 The Council was to receive a citizen report from 4 Barbara Tolleson regarding high weeds and grass in the Emerson r Street area and the mowing of lots. Me. Tolleson withdrew her request to speak before Council. The Council returned to the regular agenda order. I i i "RIM I City of Denton city council Minutes. June 5, 1990 Page 4 1. The Council considered approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of April 17 and May 1, 1990; the special call meeting of May 8, 1990; the regular meeting of may 15, 19901 and the special call meeting of May 22, 1990. Hopkins motioned, Gorton seconded to approve the minutes as presented. Motion carried unanimously, 6. The Council received a citizen report from Warren Hoffpauir regarding high weeds and grass in the Emerson Street area. + Mr. Hoffpauir stated that there was a problem in the area with 1 high weeds and getting the weeds mowed. The neighbors understood the procedure but the problem was with the property f owner. The property owner was out-of-state and the procedure 1 took several wee%s from beginning to end. At the end of the procedure, the weeds could be several feet high. He was requesting a consideration of a change of the code regarding out-of-state property owners or those who lived out of the City so that the lots would be mowed regularly. They were not asking for a manicured lot but to have it mowed on a regular j basis. The area had many rats, mice, snakes and mosquitoes due to the high grass. There were twelve lots in question. Council Member Alexander questioned if the ordinance could not I be structured so that repeated violations would be dealt with quicker. Mayor Pro Tem. Boyd suggested f.nea for repeated violations. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that most cases received and never due reach would be reported would follo%p with a 10 day notice to abate the nuisance prior to the time the City was authorized to mow. The problem was the 10 day waiting period in which the weeds continue to grow and by the time the grass was mowed, it could be three feet high. Council Member Ayer suggested tightening the code enforcement ordinance. After a certain number of violations, something should be able to be done to discourage repetition of the same violation. 7. The council received a citizen report from Evelyn Cosby regarding high weeds and grass in the Foxcroft Street area. I Il9 W 4 t ° City of Denton City Council Minutes June 5, 1990 Page 5 Ms, Cosby stated that there was a constant battle with the y weeds in the area. There was a large delay at times due to the process involved. She suggested that the code be changed so that citizens would not have to call all the time. The vacant lots should be cut on a monthly basis durirg the spring/summer months. She also stated that mowing easements in the area was also a problem. The residents should be required to keep the ° easements mowed. 8. The Council received a citizen report from Roland Vela regarding an update on TMPA. 1 Dr. Vela stated that the operation budget for TMPA would be lower again this year. The decrease was due to the refinancing of bonds and the stringent cost controls throughout the Agency. The Agency was still in the process of selling its participation in the Texas Utilities nuclear plant at Comanche Peak. To date, the Agency had received $267 million and still had $268 million to receive. Council Member Gorton asked of Lhe funds still outstanding, were any of those funds earmarked for early retirement of debt service. Vela replied that all of the funds were earmarked for early debt retirement. 9. The Council received a citizen report from Carl Young j concerning a flag pole in Fred Moore Park, the C.O.P.S. a Program, redistricting District 11 and the general attitude of Black people to the City. Mr. Young stated that to increase voter participation, to generate more citizen participation in government, and to increase minority participation in City government, he wad i( requesting the City Council appoint a citizen commission. The y 1 commission would consider adopting a six-one city council I i election plan. The plan would decrease the expense of running 1 for city council and would increase the probability of minority j representation. He asked for a citizen police review board with subpoena power. Hb would like a change in the alcohol i rule in Fred Moore Park. He felt that C.O.P,S. program was a duplication of Parks and Recreation programs. A jobs program was needed. He had evidence of police brutality where he and his son were beaten by the police which he took to court and j won acquittal of the case. He was speaking for the majority of tEe people and was speaking as an elected official. He also wanted a flag pole in Fred Moore Park. He wanted an answer to his statements by June 19, 19901 j B ~ i 1 1 ~JR.lr= MYV~ A RCYt~ 1 1 F'. i City of Denton City council minutes June 5, 1990 Page 6 The Council received citizen report from Ruby Cole 10. regarding the N.I.C.E, program and the C.O.P,S. program. Ms. Cole, Chair - N.I.C.E. and C.O.P.S., stated that reports were not of the two that the C.O.P.S. program was not wanted She presented a petition with 484 names in support programs. The Chief of Police did not select east Denton to experiment with. The citizens were tired of the things that were going on in southeast Denton and especially in Fred Moore Park. Her understanding was that a park was for the enjoyment of children and their families which was not the case in Fred Moore Park. Some of the residents wanted to so something about the situation and went directly to the City Manager's office. The program began in April of 1988 with the help of Chief Jez and was implemented in DecQmber of 1988. Theta were goals and objectives with the program. The committee had met every second Monday since 1988. The :rain purpose of the group was to not make sure that activities happening in red Mt re Park did She happen at the Martin Luther King, Jr felt that today the neighborhood was a much nicer neighborrhood and was much cleaner. Besides h C.0 V.S. hoodprogram, residents was implemented to clean up the did not want drinking in the park under cray circumstances. 11. Public Hearings A. The Council held a public hearing adoption of an ordinance amending Appendix p new use, Correctional Facilities, to the s ddin and considered a Code of Ordinances hedule of uses. (The Planning and Zoning 4 c f Commission recommended approval.) The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor. ' No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Frank Robbins, stated that the ordinance defined correctional facilities and added it to the table of permitted uses in the authorize by 'i zoning ordinance. The proposed ordinance would in the specific use permit, correctional nduetrialedistcict and i agricultural, light industrial, heavy i in planned development districts. Because they were authorized by specific use permits in three districts and also by an planned development, every correctional facility would have expansion of an existing facilityl afterereviewlofythe detailed to be approved by the City y Counc i sits plan. I i Owl I 1 M~ City of Denton City Council Minutes June 5, 1990 Page 7 Council Member Gorton asked if a private enterprise would have a different course of action to follow. Rob'rjins replied that any type of facility, private or public, would have to follow the same conditions. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 90-078 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING APPENDIX B - ZONING OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ADDING A W USuE TTO THE PROVIDING PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOFt AN PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander y" Hopkins "Gorton aye, Ayer aye, Boyd aye, and Mayor Motion carried unanimously. 12. Consent Agenda Council Member Trent requested Item 12.A.I. be pulled for special consideration. Hopkins motioned, Ayer seconded to approve the Consent Agenda with the exception of Item 12.A.1. Motion carried unanimously. A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 2. Bid 11106 - Water Meters 3. Bid 11103 - Westview Trail 4. Bid 11104 - 1969 CIP Replacement of Miscellaneous Water and Sewer Lines Item 12.A.1. was considered. f Council Member Trent asked about the procedure for issuing uniforms so that they were not given out incorrectly and an officer receive more than he was entitled to receive. Mike Jez, Chief of Police, stated that new employees received five summer shirts, five winter shirts, five pairs of pants and additional equipment needed such as rain coats, etc. From that point, every time they had a replacement item, a form was required requesting that the uniform item be replaced. The form 4 itembhadhto be exchanged forwthe new aitemxchange j basis was thepoldv 6. I i ~.pM+ OOwtf ~i { City of Denton City Council minutes June 5, 1990 Page 8 ove spent carried be council was not asked used, t was amount the amount estimated unMember iforms Tient on th to the next budget year. i Jez replied that there was no carry over from one year to the next, The budget figures for the current year were low and would be higher next year. New employees still were not outfitted with uniforms and the Department was notthablewe to rocess re purchase uniforms because of the bidding p * currently involved with. times on the unit price of bid wa period the City is Manager and g would Harrell be l for e year that bas Council Member Trent stated that he was looking for some scrutiny. something that was confidence in some sort of this was distributed without Alexander motioned, Hopkins seconded to approve Consent Agenda Item 12.A.1. Motion carried unanimously. A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid 01111 - Police Uniforms 13. Ordinances I A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance 1 accepting competitive bids and providing for t the award or i contracts for the purchase of materials, equipmen, f services. (9.A•l. - Bid #1111, 9.A.2. - Bid 11106) The following ordinance was considered: 140. 90-079 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A I CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES r PROVIDING EXPENDITURE OF AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 1 Boyd motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins 'ayeGorton 'aye,' Ayer 'aye,Boyd "aye,' and Mayor Castleberry aye. Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contract tsA.4or- Bid public works or improvements. (9.A.3. - Bid o I 1 f R City of Denton City Council Minutes June 5, 1990 Page 9 No. 90-060 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTSI PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORI AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ~a. Gorton motioned, Ayer seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent 'aye,' Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,' Gorton "aye,' Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye,' Motion carried unanimously. Item 14.A. was considered. 14. Resolutions A. The Council considered approval of a resolution by the City of Denton, Texas, authorizing the City Manager to sign and submit to the Department of Housing and Urban Development a final statement of objectives and projected us4 of funds with appropriate certifications, as authorized and ` required by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. (The Community Development Block Grant Committee recommended approval.) Council Member Alexander stated that he was getting clarification that the recommendation from the CDBG Committee was that the Martin Luther King, Jr. Recreation Center program be funded at the level recommended and that a decision relating to additional scholarships for the other action sites be delayed until a later point in the budget process. Lloyd Harrell, City Mana er, stated that the Block Grant r Committee and the Parks and Recreation Board had considered three different alternatives in response to the Council's request. The alternatives were continue with the original recommendation, (2) offer a number of scholarships to some of the outlying school sites and then reduce the number of children who could be accommodated rat the MLK Center, and (3) not open the MLK site and distribute scholarships. The third alternative was rejected simply because it would not qualify 0 for Block Grant funding since it did not offer any new city services. Both groups recommended that 34 slots at MLK be authorized primarily because that was the desire of the neighborhood. Council Member Alexander Ltated that this type of program was a wonderful program for children in low/moderate income levels where there might not be adequate supervision after school. e r" City of Denton City Council Minutes June 5, 1990 Page 10 Council Member Gorton stated that he was concerned that this type of program might generate 'equal but separate" programming, Ramsey replied that that was not the intent of the program. It was a reflection of the reality of the demographics of the area. The need was overwhelming at the location. In regards to having scholarships for such youngsters at other school sites, the transportation problem came into play. Council Member Gorton also questioned the liability of the child walking from the bus stop to the Center and who had responsibility for liability between the bus stop and the Center. Ramsey replied that if the School District had responsibility to return the children to their residential stop-off point and those children were identified as part of the action site program, then instead of the children being left off at an intermediate point, they would be delivered to the action 1 site. The School District was reluctant to make those exceptions for fear of multiplying requests for alternate stops. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd asked if the Fred Moore Day Care Center were to close, could some of the CDBG money be spent to improve the Center so it would not close. Barbara Ross replied that an amendment would have to be done to the ordinance to substitute that project for an approved project. The following resolution was considered: R90-025 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AND SUBMIT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT A FINAL STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS WITH APPROPRIATE CERTIFICATIONS, AS AUTHORIZED AND REQUIRED BY THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974, AS AMENDEDi AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motioned, Alexander seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Trent 'aye,' Alexander "aye,' Hopkins "aye,' Gorton 'aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye,' and Mayor Castleberry 'aye.' Motion carried unanimously. The Council returned to the regular agenda order. i I :y w ~ 1 all r v City of Denton City Council Minutes June 5, 1990 Page 11 r r 13. Ordinances C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance establishing classified positions in the Fire Department of the City of Denton, Texas; providing for the number of persons authorized for each classified position) and repealing all ordinances and resolutions in conflict herewith, Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that this item fulfilled civil service requirements and eliminated one authorized battalion chief position from the list of positions within the Fire Department. This followed the Chief's philosophy of trying to reduce the number of top management people within the department and push the decision making process down within the department, Council Member Gorton stated that a position was not being eliminated nor an individual. John Cook, Fire Chief, stated that there had been a retirement and a promotion in the department which resulted in the vacancy. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 90-081 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CLASSIFIED POSITIONS IN THE FIRE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF DENTON# TEXAS; j PROVIDING FOR THE NUMBER OF PERSONS AUTHORIZED FOR EACH CLASSIFIED POSITION: REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH= AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. j Alexander motioned, Boyd seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent 'aye,' Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins 'aye," Gorton i, 'aye,' Ayer 'aye,' Boyd 'aye,' and Mayor Castleberry "aye,' i + Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing assignment pay for Fire Department employees who are also assigned to perform the duties of d*ta entry clerk, shift training officer, and who are all assigned to perform the duties necessary to maintain the arson task force. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 90-082 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING ASSIGNMENT PAY FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES WHO ARE ALSO ASSIGNED TO PERFORM THE DUTIES OF DATA ENTRY CLERK, SHIFT TRAINING JI OFFICER, AND WHO ARE ALL ASSIGNED TO PERFORM THE DUTIES NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN THE ARSON TASK FORCE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. s I Fi y City of Denton City Council Minutes June 5, ]990 Page 12 9 Boyd motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander 'aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye,' Ayer "aye," Boyd 'aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye.' Motion carried unanimously. E E, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance 'r amending Chapter 9 1/2 ('Fair Housin Ordinances b 9") of the Code of y providing that discriminatory housing practices { based on handicap or familial status, as defined herein, were unlawful; and providing for a maximum fine of $500.00 for violations thereof. Barbara Ross, Community Development Coordinator, stated that this ordinance amended Chapter 9 1/2 of the Code of Ordinances j and would include families and the handicapped in the protected classes in the fair housing ordinance. It would also provide guidelines for developers and builders on how to provide handicapped accessibility for the covered multifamily dwelling units, Council Member Gorton asked who did the inspections and where were the specifications written. Ross replied that there were federal guidelines detailing the specifications. Council Member Gorton asked if the fines were for denying an applicant or for not following the specifications. Ross replied for not following the construction guidelines, Council Member Gorton asked if the fine was per violation. Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, replied that a fine could be assessed per violation, Coun:il Member Trent asked if the fine would be for a willful violation or for someone who unknowingly made a violation due to the fault of a subcontractor or who did not know of the regulations. Ross replied that the ordinance would apply to all new construction which would be ready for occupancy on or after March 13, 1991, It would be up to the City's Building Code Department to make sure that individuals who applied for that type of permit would know the regulations. City Manager Harrell stated that the standards were already adopted as part of the building code of the City, When the inspector went out to inspect the properties, he would treat it as any other inspection. The fines would apply only if the contractor refused to comply with the building code after a red i tag. . t ` E f i.•+• City of Denton City Council Minutes June 5, 1990 I Page 13 Council Member Ayer stated that during the inspection, the Iv builder could correct any error before the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. If the builder did not make the ` correction, then he would be in willful violation and a fine could be assessed. k The following ordinance was considered. I No. 90-083 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 9 1/2 ("FAIR HOUSING') OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY PROVIDING THAT DISCRIMINATORY HOUSING PRACTICES BASED ON HANDICAP OR FAMILIAL STATUS, AS DEFINED HEREIN, ARE UNLAWFUL; PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM FINE OF $500.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF► AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. FOR Boyd motioned, Ayer seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent 'aye,' Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins 'aye,' Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye,' Boyd 'aye,' and mayor Castleberry 'aye." Motion carried unanimously. F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance amending Section II of the franchiae granted to Lone Star Gas company by ordinance No. 82-56 to provide for an amended franchise fee to be paid by Lone Star Gas Company for the use ` of the public streets. John McGrane, Executive Director for Finance, stated that the proposal had been put in the 1989-90 budget. The City had been negotiating with Lone Star Gas Company. Because the franchise agreement ran through the year 2002, any amendment had to be mutually agreed upon. There were two points the City was 1 trying to negotiate with Lone Star - (1) changing the franchise I fee from 2% to 39 and (2) changing from an annual payment to a quarterly payment. After months of negotiations, it was agreed that the payment would remain an annual payment and the fee would be increased to 3%. This was the first of three readings in order for the ordinance to become effective. ` j The following ordinance was considered: 11 NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION II OF THE FRANCHISE GRANTED TO LONE STAR GAS COMPANY BY ORDINANCE NO. 82-56 TO PROVIDE FOR AN AMENDED FRANCHISE FEE TO BE PAID BY LONE STAR GAS COMPANY FOR THE USE OF THE i II PUBLIC STREETS. f I~ City Of Denton City Council Minutes June 5, 1990 ' Page 14 Hopkins mo(.ioned,Ayer seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent 'aye, Alexander 'aye," Hopkins 'aye,' Gorton Motion arriedaunani ously,aye," and Mayor Castleberry •aye " G. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance altering speed zones on Bonnie Brae Street from Scripture Street to U. S. Highway 77 for a distance of 2,5 miles; providing for a penalty of a fine not exceeding two hundred dollars ($200.00); and providing a severability clause. (The ( Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommended approval.) Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that the Citizens J Traffic Safety Support Commission had reviewed the item at their February meeting. It was before the Council in early April. At that time, Council instructed the Commission to review the item again after notification of the residents in the area of the proposed change, The Commission held a public hearing on April 30, 1990 with the appearance of one property owner. The Commission confirmed their original recommendation. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 90-084 AN ORDINANCE ALTERING SPEED ZONES ON BONNIE BRAE STREET FROM SCRIPTURE STREET TO U.S. HIGHWAY 77 FOR A DISTANCE OF 2.5 MILES; PROVIDING FOR A PENALY NOT EXCEEDING TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($2T0 00OF A PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARINGAN EFFECTIVE DATE. Alexander motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinjr,ce. On roll vote, Trent 'aye, Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins 'aye," Gorton I Motion arriedaunani oBod usly,aye# and Mayor Castleberry "aye,' H. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute a supplemental agreement between the City of Denton and Alan Mummer and Associates for consulting services. (The Public Utilities Board recommended approval.) Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that this was the third supplemental agreement with Plummer and Associates in order to obtain a wastewater treatment permit ` approved through the Texas Water Commission. When the latest copy of the permit was submitted to the Water Commission, the Commission changed the time frame from 180 days to 60 days for the submission of a complete plan for the sludge management program, This shortened time frame was too much for staff to complete alone. !a r City of Denton city council Minutes June 5, 1990 Page 15 Boyd motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. Council Member Ayer asked if the time frame had remained at 180 days, could the City staff had completed the work. U-jr) Nelson replied yes. Council Member Trent asked what the original $9800 was spent for. Nelson replied the permit had expired in July of 1988 at which ti+ae the City was in the process of looking at the possibility of making sales of effluent wastewater from the treatment plant to the two universities for use on their golf courses and to the City for its park system. The Texas Water Commission had held the City's renewal of the permit and were working with the City during that period of time. Alan Plummer was initially hired to assist staff in developing and researching alternatives to the proposed permit renewal draft. Council Member Trent asked what the $6100 would do for the City. i Nelson replied that after reviewing the plant expansion schedule, the decision was made to terminate the 12 MGD permit application and to permit for a 15 MGD plant. During that time, the Water Commission had stated that the City had 180 days to complete a sludge disposal plan. However on May 7, I 1990, the Commission changed the time frame and the plan must be submitted in 60 days to accommodate the permit review process. While City staff could complete the process in 180 days, it was not able to complete the process in only 60 days. The proposed agreement would complete the process for the City. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 90-085 i AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF k DENTONO CONSUTEXAS LTING AND SERVICES; PLUMMER AND AUTHORIZING ATHECI XT ENeDITINC. URE OF FUNDS THEREFORi AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Boyd motioned, Gurton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll w vote, Trent 'aye,' Alexander *aye,' Hopkins 'aye,' Gorton 'aye," Ayer 'aye," Boyd 'aye,' and mayor Castleberry "aye.' Motion carried unanimously. 14, Resolutions I A. Item A. was considered earlier in the meeting. t i City of Denton City Council Minutes June 5, 1990 Page 16 B. The Council considered approval of a resolution authorizing the execution of a right-of-way easement for electrical power transmission facilities and a license agreement for a temporary construction area for these facilities. (The Public Utilities Board recommended approval.) Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that the easement was for a 24' wide strip from the entrance gate below the Lake Lewisville Dam down to the outlet works where the hydroelectric turbin would be placed. Along that easement, a 1400 volt transmission line would be built, The easement would be for 50 years which would be the life of the project. The following resolution was considered; NO. R50-026 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION FACILITIES AND A LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR A TEMPORARY { CONSTRUCTION AREA FOR THESE FACILITIES$ AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Alexander motioned, Ayer seconded to adopt the ordinance. On ' roll vote, Trent 'aye,' Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins 'aye,' Gorton 'aye,' Ayer 'aye,' Boyd 'aye,' and Mayor Castleberry 'aye.' Motion carried unarimously. I 15. The Council received a resolution from the Public Utilities Board requesting the City Council to initiate proceedings to affect a change in the Charter of the City of Denton to allow for Executive Sessions for purposes allowed by the Open Meetings Act of the State of Texas. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that the Public Utilities Board requested that resolution be transmitted to the Council, Council Member Ayer stated the present charter did not have a provision for the Public Utilities Board to have executive sessions. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd stated that it was stronger than that and j that the Public Utilities Board shall not have executive sessions, He also stated that three-four months ago he had suggested that a commission be appointed to begin studying charter revisions. 16. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. i Lloyd Harrell, Cit Mana ec ' items: y 9 r presented the following 1 Y IA 1 S S City of Denton City Council Minutes June 5, 1990 r Page 17 A. As the next Council meeting would be scheduled for July 3, did the Council wish to postpone until July 10. Consensus of the Council was to postpone until July 100 1990. B. The Work Session item dealing with the revised City Council budget priorities questionnaire which was not considered during the Work Session included the buojet rankings of the new Council Members and deleted the rankings of the former Council Members. 17. There was no official action taken on items considered during the Work Session Executive Session. 18. New Business The following items were suggested by Council Members for future agendas: A. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd presented the Mayor and Council Member Trent with Council pins. B. Council Member Gorton stated that he was disappointed that registration occurred for the next school year prior to the consideration of the CDBG funding and the proposed MLK funding for the after school action site. He would like the report presented a year ago updated regarding the action sites. He would like Council to consider what would be proposed for the current after school action site programs and the funding of scholarships at those facilities. C. Council Member Trent proposed a change in the manner of appointing members to the Boards/Commissions, He suggested inviting the applicants to appear before the Council as a whole where the Council could ask questions of the applicants. 19. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters (considered action in In Re: "I owl considered action on claim of John Hawley, considere act on in Conover vs, Cit , considered action in Kelsot et. all considered act on in Champion vs, city), rea estate, and personnel/board appointments (held a lscuasion and considered appointments to all City of Denton Boards and Commissions), Council Member Hopkins left the meeting during the discussion of In Re: Flow. t 1 f r City of Denton City Council Minutes June 5, 1990 Page 18 No official action was taken. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned. I f BOB CAS EBERRY, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS J i 1 NN ER W ALTERS CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON 3271C I l j ~ i I MM~ i EXHIBIT A FINAL STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 0lJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE or FUNDS The objective of the City of Denton's Community Development Block Grant Program is to support ac tivitiu which are dtreeted toward the specific objective of development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanlinq economic opportunity, principally for persons of low and moderate incowas The City anticipates receiving approximately $553,134 for its 1990 program year, Proposed -nw activities and objectives are as followst It ifousinq Mshabilitatior, 4144,443.00 Continuation of the existing program to rehebtlitatc substandard houses inhabited by low or moderate income E pars-.u living in ti~q City, Objectives TO bring existing houslnq into compliance with housing code and arrest deteriorating r,aightorhoods in the target atea, 7. The Urban Someoteading Pi:ogram 41001000.00 Acquisition of VA and FHA foreclosures, CDEO funds will be used to supplement Section 830 Urban Homesteading funds. Acquired properties will be conveyed to eligible homesteaders. They will be required to pay all f rehabilitation and maintenance coats. , Objectives ft provide affordable housing for low and moderate income ' families. To arrest deterioration and promote stabilisation of neighborhoods. 3. MLR After School Program 414,434,00 Subsidies will be provided to low and moderate income families in order to place children at the Martin Luther Xing, Jr. After School Program, Additional program costs will be paid as needed, I Objectives Improvement or public services provided to low and moderate income residento, 44 Denton Police Athletic League 4140S47,Q0 Payment of sports participation fees and purchase of equipment for low and moderate income children, Objectivei Improvement of public services provided to low and moderate income residents, , v 1 I i awl I final Statement Page 2 Fop at. 9. Denton County Prenatal Clinic f:/,9so.ao Provislon of prenatal care for low income women from Denton County. funds will be used to pay a portion of the salary for an additional coca-midwife. Objectives improvement of public services provided to low and moderate income residents. Is Administration ¢110,500.00 Program management, coordination# monitoring, and evaluation associated with carrying out eligible grant activities. Includings staff salariess office equipment and supplies office rent, maintenance, and utilitiesi administration of rental rehabilitations emergency shelter grant and human services programs# administration of City's Foir Sousing Ordinance and Programs costs associated with development of an affordable housing programs j ~ i I i 0911! ~ 1 ~.x;„Mid i~ g CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 19, 1990 i The Council convened into the Work Session at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry: Mayor Pro Tem Boydi Council Members Ayer, Gorton, and Trent. ABSENT: Council Members Alexander and Hopkins ICI 1. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters (considered action in In Re: Flow and Kelsoe et, real estate, and personnel/boar appo n ments e a scussion and considered appointments to all City of Denton Boarda and Commissions). t 2. The Council received a presentation and considered the Fire Department's swimming pool safety program 'Just A Few seconds". Glenn Vaughn, Denton Fire Department, stated that they were using Fire Department manpower and any available outside manpuwer to deliver safety flyers regarding pool safety. The goal of the program was to deliver a flyer to every residence in the city of Denton. The program would teach adults how to prevent their children from drowning or their neighbors children. CPR was again being taught at the fire stations. Vaughn showed a video tape which focused on ways to raise public awareness regarding pool safety. 3. The Council discussed and considered an engagement of auditors to perform an audit for the year ending September 300 1990. John McGrane, Executive Director for Finance, stated that there was a vacancy on the Audit Committee and requested Council consider a replacement. In the pact, the auditors were engaged for the three year contract with an annual review each year. Preliminary work would begin in July. He was asking Council if they had any problems with the current auditors and if not, did they want to continue with their contract. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd stated that in addition to the general audit, the City usually had the auditors look at one additional iter for the same fee. He stated that the City had beiii able to negotiate a somewhat lower fee in the second/third year of the audit than in the first year. ` Con ensue of the Council was to add Mayor Castleberry to the Audit Committee and to try to include an extra item in the audit. I F iw i~ t City of Denton City Council Minutes June 190 1990 Page 2 The Council convened into the Regular Session at 7;00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. j PRESENTr Mayor Castleberryt Mayor Pro Tem Boyd; Council Members Ayer, Gorton, and Trent. ABSENT; Council Member Alexander and Hopkins 1. The Council received a citizen report from Joel Dearrington regarding appointments to the City of Denton Boards and Commissions. Mr. Dearrington read a statement to Council regarding appointments to the boards/commissions. He stated that he had submitted an application to the Airport Board with no response to date. He felt with his background, he would be a good asset to the Airport Board. He stated that there was no review of potential member qualifications and questioned a recent appointment who had no experience with airports, airplanes, etc. He asked the Council to look into the appointments on the Airport Board closely. (See Exhibit A) The Mayor presented a proclamation for Fred Douglas/Fred Moore Day. 2. Consent Agenda Gorton motioned, Trent seconded to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Motion carried unanimously. A. Bids and Purchase Orderss 1. Bid #1112 - Traffic Signal Closed Loop System 2. Bid 01115 - Truck Cab Chassis/Derrick Line Body 3. Bid #1114 - Cement, Concrete, Lime and Aggregate 4, P.O. #96781 - Pitney Bowes - Lease of Postage Equipment f B, Tax Refunde 1. Considered approval of a tax refund to { Waterfield Mortgage Co. - $726.09. i C. Plats I i . 1. Considered approval of a preliminary plat of Western Hills Business Parki Lot 1, Block i A. (The Planning and zoning commission recommended approval.) s r l G ~ IVt ~ `I S eM r city of Denton City Council Minutes June 19, 1990 Page 3 3. Ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance ard of accepting competitive bids and providing for the aw e purchase of materials, 2A.equipment, #11151 2.A.3. - services. (2.A.1. - Bid 41112, Bid 41114) The following ordinance was considered: NO. 90-086 ORDINANCE THE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AN AWARDING MATERIALSD EQUIPMENT, CONTRACT FOR , SUPPLIES Ij PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE7 AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Boyd motioned, Ayer seconded to "ad Ayer the ordinance. on' rand vote, Trent aye, Gorton aye, Ye+ Mayor Castleberry 'aye." Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for purchases of materials or equipment which are available from one source in - ! accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. (2.A.4. P.O. 496781) The following ordinance was considered: N0. 90-087 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR PURCHASES OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WHICH ARE AVAILABLE FROM ONLY ONE SOURCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS LAW NG PROVIDINGFRAN REQUIREMENTSF OF ACOMPETITIVE EXEMPTIBIDS1SUCHANDPURCHASES EFFECTIVE DATE. j oll Boyd motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt she o~d era d e"aYe ;rand vote, Trent "aye,' Gorton 'aye," Ayer aye, Y Mayor Castleberry "aye.' Motion carried unanimously. ` C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance Gas amending Section II of the 8ran6hise provide tfoLone S amended Company by Ordinance No. 2-5 to r an for the use franchise fee to be paid by Lone Star Gas Company of the public streets. (Second Reading) t City of Denton City Council Minutes ' June 19, 1900 Page 9 The following ordinance was considered: NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION II OF THE FRANCHISE GRANTED TO LONE STAR GAS COMPANY BY ORDINANCE NO. 82-56 TO PROVIDE FOR AN AMENDED FRANCHISE FBE TO BE PAID BY LONE STAR GAS COMPANY FOR THE USE OF THE PUBLIC STREETS. Ayer notioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. f Council Member Trent stated that during the first reading, it h was his understanding that they were attempting to recover a 15,000 loss. If that was correct, why were they doing a 50,000 0 recovery. i City Manager Harrell stated that the reason for looking at the franchise fee came about when the University of North Texas changed their methodology for acquiring gas supply. That change eliminated approximately $15,000 worth of City revenue. During the review of the gas franchise, it was discovered that the City's 2% fee was substantially lower than that charged by most of the cities in the north Texas area. Last year during the budget discussion, a3 the Council struggled to balance the budget, the decision was made to include within the budgeted City budget for this year, sufficient revenue for a li increase which totalled $50,000. That money was used to balance the budget. The Council voted on the motion. On roll vote, Trent "aye,' Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye,' Boyd "aye,' and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance 4 abandoning and vacating that portion of Avenue E located l between Eagle Drive and the north bound Service Road of Interstate Highway 35E as a public streets and reserving a utility easement therein. (The Planning and Zoning Commissicn recommended approval.) The following ordinance was considered: NO. 90-088 i AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ABANDONINO AND VACATING THAT PORTION OF AVENUE E LOCATED BETWEEN EAGLE DRIVE AND THE NORTH BOUND SERVICE ROAD OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35E AS A PUBLIC STREETS RESERVING A UTILITY EASEMENT THEREIN) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, i. l lVt~ ~ n J 00 City of Denton City Council Minutes June 19, 1990 Page 5 Rick Svehia, Deputy City Manager, stated that this was a quit claim to the University of North Texas for a portion of the 4 right-of way. The University gave the City the new right-of-way for the new curb section of Avenue E. This was being done so that the City would noL have to maintain the property, Boyd motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll i vote, Trent "aye,' Gorton "aye,' Ayer 'aye,' Boyd 'aye,' and Mayor Castleberry 'aye.' Motion carried unanimously. E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with Coleman and Associates surveying for field survey data collection services relating to the construction of pump station and a forty-two inch (42') water transmission line. (The Public 1 Utilities Board recommended approval. Dave Ham► Director of Water/Wastewater, stated that this was part of the design of the treatment plant at Ray Roberts. Utility easements and boundary surveys were needed for the raw water line at a distance of approximately one mile. The following ordinance was considered: NO, 90-069 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH COLEMAN AND ASSOCIATES SURVEYING FOR FIELD SURVEY AND DATA COLLECTION SERVICES RELATING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF PUMP STATION AND A FORTY-TWO INCH (420) WATER TRANSMISSION LINE; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE= AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Gorton motioned, Ayer seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent 'aye,' Gorton 'aye,' Ayer 'aye,' Boyd "aye,' and mayor Castleberry 'aye.' Motion carried unanimously. F, The Co•incil considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City manager to execute a contract with Coleman and Associates surveying for field survey and data collection services relating to the construction of pump station and a thirty-six (361) water transmission line. (The Public Utilities Board recommended approval.) Dave Ham, Director of Water/Wastewater, stated that this was for easement and boundary surveys from the new water plant to the booster station which was approximately 6 miles. r f E ~s 2 {.x.',.• wn i1 City of Denton city council minutes June 19, 1990 I Page 6 Council Member Ayer stated that he thought the line was to be larger than 360. Nam replied that several size lines had been considered. A 36" f` sit) line would be build at this time and when the line was maxed out in the future, a parallel line would be built using the same easement, The following ordinance was considered: NO. 90-790 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH COLEMAN AND ASSOCIATES SURVEYING FOR FIELD SURVEY AND DATA COLLECTION SERVICES RELATING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF PUMP STATION AND A THIRTY-SIX (360) WATER TRANSMISSION LIN EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE1 AND AUTHORIZING PROVIDING TAN EFFECTIVE DATE, i Ayer motioned, Trent seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll , vote, Trent layer' Gorton "aye,' Ayer layer" Boyd a e Mayor Castleberry aye. Motion carried unanimously. y and G. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance { authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 2 to the I agreeme t Febr aryl l6r 1968 netween the City of Denton and services for the design of the Lake RaypRobertsoWaternlreatment Plant. (The Public Utilities Board recommended approval.) Bob Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities, stated that in February of 1988, the City entered into a contract with Freese and Nichols for engineering services for two major projects. One was the water plant on Ray Roberts, The other was for the tanks and the booster Pump station to be placed at the Hartlee ' Field Road site. At the time of the agreement, the intention and scope of the project had been changed due to negotiations with the neighbors. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 90-091 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE AGREEMENT OF FEBRUARY 16, 1988 BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. RELATING TO PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN OF THE LAKE RAY ROBERTS WATER TREATMENT PLANTI AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THRREFORE1 AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, 1 imil :i rr r City of Denton City Council Minutes June 19, 1990 Page 7 Boyd motioned, Ayer seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent 'aye,' Gorton "aye," Ayer 'aye,' Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry 'aye," Motion carried unanimously. H. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance ` of the City of Denton, Texas, approving a settlement and i ? release of all claims, for pending litigation between the City of Denton and Ken D. Conover. The following ordinance was considered: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING A COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS FOR PENDING LITIGATION BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND KEN D. CONOV£Rt AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Boyd motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance, On roll vote, Trent "aye,' Gorton "aye,' Ayer 'aye,' Boyd "aye,' and Mayor Castleberry 'aye,' Motion carried unanimously. The Council considered the supplemental agenda item. 1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance ~ authorizing a change order to the contract with Jagoe Public Company and providing for an increase in the contract price. (Bid 01069) i Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that two pieces of water line on Oak Street had been found to have a problem. Parts of the line were 3-4' deep and other parts were 1' deep. There was a potential problem in the areas where the line was 1' deep with heavy traffic damaging the line. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 90-093 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE OF A CHANGE ORDER TO A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND JAGOE PUBLIC CONSTRUCTIONI PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE CONTRACT PRICES AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Ayer motioned, Trent secorr9d to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent 'aye," GOrto:, 'aye," Ayer 'aye,' Boyd 'aye,' and Mayor Castleberry 'aye.' Motion carried unanimously. j ~ I i _ t i r City of Denton City Council Minutes June 19, 1990 Page 8 F 4, Resolutions A. The Council considered approval of a resolution temporarily closing Interstate 35E frontage road, from its j intersection with Avenue E to its intersection with Bonnie Brae f on July 4, 1990, i The following resolution was considered; E NO. R90-027 A RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY CLOSING INTERSTATE 35-E FRONTAGE ROAD, FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH AVENUE E TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH BONNIE BRAE ON JULY 4, 1990: AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DALE. Ayer motioned, Boyd seconded to approve the resolution, On roll vote, Trent "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd 'aye,' and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered approval of a resolution temporarily closing Wye Street from its intersection with Cross Timber to its intersection with Mill Street July 13, 1990. The following resolution was considered: NO, R90-028 A RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY CLOSING WYE STREET FRO ITS INTERSECTION WITH CROSS TIMBER STREET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH MILL STREET ON JULY 13, 19901 AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Boyd motioned, Gorton seconded to approve the resolution, On roll vote, Trent 'aye,' Gorton 'aye,' Ayer 'aye,' Boyd 'aye,' and Mayor Castleberry 'aye.' Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered approval of a resolution approving an animal control contract between the City of Dentol and the County of Denton. Nonie Kull, Environmental Health Services Manager, stated that this was a continuation of a program began in 1986, under the agreement, the City shelter made final disposition for animals brought to the shelter from the unincorporaced areas of the County. Currently, the shelter was processing approximately 850 animals annually for the County which constituted 15% of the animals sheltered by the City of Denton. The 151 constituted 40% of the revenue realized by the Animal Control Division annually. --N 71M i y 1 NryiV { 4 City of Denton City Council Minutes June 19, 1990 Page 9 The following resolution was considered: NO. R90-029 f A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXFCUTE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE COUNTY OF DENTON FOR THE IMPOUNDMENT AND DISPOSITION OF DOGS AND CATSf AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Ayer motioned, Boyd seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer 'aye," Boyd 'aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council considered approval of a resolution postponing the July 3, 1990 Council meeting to July 10, 1990. The following resolution was considered: NO. R90-030 A RESOLUTION POSTPONING THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 3, 1990 TO JULY 10, 1990: AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Trent motioned, Ayer seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry 'aye." Motion carried unanimously. E. The Council considered approval of a resolution approving the funding of water and sewer lines to serve property to be developed by Camping World, in accordance with the approved guidelines for funding and selecting development plan water and sewer lines. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval.) Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that this was a request for a contribution for infrastructure assistance i of up to $92,000 for extension of water/sewer lines to the proposed Camping World retail facility. This was part of a oevelopment in the Western Hills area. The request met preapproved guidelines. Council member Gorton asked if as the line was extended to the site, did the City have the capability to recoup portions of the funds through individuals tying into the line. Nelson replied no that the property owner of the Western Hills facility planned to extend Worthington Street all the way through his property to the Camping World proposed site. The owner of Western Hills would extend the road and the water/sewer line from that location. At that point, the extension across the facility would be all the City would be involved in. rorw_ W_ Y 1 City of Denton City Council Minutes June 19, 1990 Page 10 City Manger Harrell stated that as the Public Utility Board talked about the development plan line as had the Council, it was envisioned to use the $500,000 to primarily benefit industrial type prospects that would come to the City. Camping world was not really an 'industry' but there were two circumstances that encouraged this recommendation. One wss that the old policy was still in effect which did free up some of the $500,000 after six months into the fiscal year, The waao~ other thing was that this type of retail store was much different than a normal retail store in that it would be primarily servicing people who were not Denton residents. The policy encouraged non-Denton people to come to Denton. i Council Member Trent questioned the wording 'if approved, will j start construction'. i Nelson replied that the developer had made the statement at the Public Utility Board mer':ing, that if the City granted the request, they would be -orating in Denton. 1 Council Member Ayer stated that doing the work would be contingent on Camping world's final decision to locate on that property. If for some reason Camping world decided not to come to Denton, the funds would not be extended. Nelson replied that was correct. 1 111 ` i The following resolution was considered: j NO. R90-031 j A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FUNDING OF WATER AND SEWER E LINES TO SF.RVE PROPERTY TO BE DEVELOPED BY CAMPING ' i WORLD, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED GUIDELINES FOR FUNDING AND SELECTING DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER AND SEWER LINES' AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. k 3 ~ ! Trent motioned, Gorton seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Trent 'aye,' Gorton 'aye," Ayer 'aye," Boyd 'aye," 4 i' and Mayor Castleberry 'aye.' Motion carried unanimously. 5. The Council received and discussed a report on 9-1-1. I Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that good progress had been made on numbering residences and the naming of streets. The next big project would be to deal with streets with similar names and residences with no numbers. The software and hardware had been installed with an August 18-19 cut-over date. 'Hot testing' would be done soon where a practice call t ` would be made to verify that computer working properly. I , i t N ry~ S tJ. I 1, i City of Denton City Council Minutes r June 19, 1990 Page 11 I 'l Council Member Gorton asked if the system were on-line and on budget without raising the rate. Svehla replied yes. City Manager Harrell stated that when the 'hot testing' was done a number was called but not the 9-1-1 number. He stated ' that there may be a few streets where there may be duplicate names and to make the system work properly, those problems would have to be dealt with. He stated that those changes would be kept to a minimum and that the property owners would be contacted. 6. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager h Lloyd Harrell, City Manager presented the following items: A. There would be a special call meeting on June 26 with a 5:15 p.m. start time. Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, would present several items until 7:00 p,m, tkt that time there would be one formal item to consider followed by Executive Session. B. Bub E:,tes, President-Greater Denton Arts Council, and several representatives had visited with him regarding preliminary plans on an option on the old Campus Theater that the local theater group had secured. They made a request for dialog wiLh the Council either as a whole or with the two previous representatives from the Council. The Greater Denton Arts Council, at a recent meeting, had voted to proceed with an attempt to acquire the theater and incorporate it into the arts ! '4 complex. 1 Council Member Gorton stated that he would be w:.lling to help with the Arts Council and thought that Council Member Alexander would also be willing. Consensus of the Council was to proceed with Council Members Gorton and Alexander to work with the Greater Denton Arts council on this issue. 7. There was no official action taken on Executive Session items during the Work Session. 8, New Business The following items of New Business were suggested by Council Members for future agendas: r' i ` City of Denton City Council Minutes f t June 19, 1990 Page 12 A. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd presented an additional x petition for support of the C.O.p,S. Program and for keeping Fred Moore Park a neighborhood park. There were now 531 signatures on those petitions. B. Council Member Gorton thanked mayor Pro Tem Boyd for his Letter to the Editor regarding a recent newstory. { 9, The Council did not meat in Executive Session during the Regular Session. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR CITY CF DF.NTON, TEXAS ENN ER WALTERS j CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 32750 IIf 3 i j i 3 1 a 1 #.F W,e IYiR i r EXHIBIT A t THRNN, YOU MR. MAYOR, COUNCIL MEMBERS; MY NAME IS JOEL DEARRINGTON. I LIVE AT 3708 LYNCHPURG, i DENTON TEXAS. IN 1987 I RETIRED FROM A 23 YEAR MANAGEMENT CAREER WITH BUICK MOTOR DIVISION OF GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION. I NOW HAVE THE TIME TO PURSUE ALt. THE TI T I NGS RETIREMENT PROVIDES. IN MY CASE, ONE ENJOYMENT 19 AVIATION. RS A COMMERCIAL PILOT, FLIGHT' INSTRUCTOR, rIRCRAFT OWNER ftND ENTHUSIAST WITH SOME IS YEARS FXPERIENCE, I WAS DRAWN TO OUR MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. WE HAVE OUR FAMILY AIRPLANE BASED THERE, AND CONTRARY TO i I POPULAR BELIEF, LINE DOES NOT HAVE TO BE WELL OFF' UR RICH 10 OWN AN AIRPLANE. OUR AIRPLANE IS YOUR GULF GAME, DINNER OUT, j AND NEW CARS. i i IN THE COURSE OF RENTING SPACE, HANGERS, BUYING FUEL, • t OBTAINING THE. REOUIRED MAINTENANCE, INSPECTIONS, AND TAXES, l { ALL THAT COMES WITH OWNING AN AIRCRAFT, MY WIFE AND I HAVE BECOME AWARE OF THE RATHER NEGATIVE -IMAGE AND REPUTATION TIUR AIRPORT HAS EARNED. WITHIN TOE- NORTH TEXAS AVIATION COMMUNITY. I OVER TWO YEARS ACb,'WI.TH SOME` OF OUR NEW FREEDOMS, I BEGAN f ! ATTENDING THE AIRPORT' BOARD MEETINGS, AT LEAST THOSE MEETINGS ,y THAT THE PUBLIC 18 NOT EXCLUDED FROM. IN IALHINO WITH THE AIRPORT MANAGER, A CITY EMPLOYEE. I BECAME AWARE AND CONVINCED THAT THE NEGATIVE PERCEPTIONS APPARENT IN THE MINDS ~1 . r 1 a. t ~ I t q e~ I OF MANY WERE, IN FACT, JUSTIFIED. } I ALSO BECAME CONVINCED THAT MY MANAGEMENT BACK GROUND, COMMON SENSE APPROACH AND AVIATION EXPERIENCE JUST MIGHT i ALLOW ME TO MAKE A CONTRIBUTION TO OUR AIRPORT AND HELP i CORRECT SOME OF THE DISTRESS THAT IS SO OBVIOUS. TO THIS END AND THROUGH MY MANY DISCUSSIONS WITI{ YOUR AIRPORT MANAGER, I COMPLETED AN APPLICATION OFFERING MY TALENTS AND MY MANY FREE HOURS AS A VOLUNTEER ON YOUR AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD. DURING THE PAST TWO YEARS I HAVE KEPT MY APPLICATION ACTIVE WITH SEVERAL CALLS TO YOUR CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE, AND EACH TIME I RENEWED MY OFFER AND EFFCRT4. WHEN I LAST CHECKED, ONE WEEK AFTER THE MOST RECENT i OPENING BECAME AVAILABLE NO OTHER APPLICATIONS WERE ON FILE EXCEPT MINE. ONE COULD PRESUME FROM THIS THAT NO ONE ELSE WAS INTERESTED IN THIS NO PAY POSITION. TIME HAS PASSED, AND THE COMMUNITY HAS SEEN A GREAT DEAL OF NEGATIVE COMMENTS APPEAR IN OUR NEWSPAPER REGARDING THE ATMOSPHERE ON THE AIRPORT. MILLIONS OF DOLLARS HAVE BEEN i SPENT PREPARING FOR THE SOUTH END DEVELOPMENT "BOOM" WHICH HAS NEVER MATERIALIZED. CURRENT AIRPORT OCCUPANTS ARE ALMOST UNANIMOUS IN THEIR DISTRESS WITH THE AIRPORT ATMOSPHERE AND AT LEAST ONE INTERESTED, ENTHUSIASTIC , EXPERIENCED, "NO COST" VOLUNTEER REMAINS UNCHALLENGED IN HIS DESIRE TO CONTRIBUTE. CALLS TO THE CITY SECRETARY+S OFFICE REVEAL MY APPLICATION r' 4 r AWAITS AN OPENING ON THE BOARD. A LETTER FROM MAYOR STEPHEN9 DATED APRIL 9, 1994 STATES THAT MY APPLICATION HAS SEEN PULLED FOR RECON91DERPTION INDICATING TO ME THAT THE POSITION HAD NOT BEEN FILLED. THIS CERTAINLY APPEARS REASONABLE. BUT, I NOW FIND THAT AN APPOINTMENT WAS MADE PRIOR TO APRIL 9, AND THAT THE OPENING HAD SEEN FILLED! STRANGE THAT ALL THIS HAPPENED WITHOUT REPLY FROM YOUR VARIOUS OFFICES, NO INTERVIEW, NO DUESTIONS REGARDING 14Y CONTINUED INTERE9Y, NO REVIEW OF DUALIFICATIONS OR DESIRE, NO POLITE DECLINATION OF MY VOLUNTEER SERVICES, A WEEK AFTER THE AWA1lE0 VACANCY NO OTHER APPLICANTS OR VOLUNTEERS WERE INTERESTED ENOUGH TO COMPLETE AN APPLICATION, "NONE RECEIVED" SAYS YOUR CITY I SECRETARY. AT MY AGE, REJECTION 19 NEITHER NEW 14OR DEVASTATING. BUT I DID LOOK A BIT DEEPER. I DISCOVERED THE GENTLEMAN RECENTLY I I APPOINTED TO THE BOARD DID NOT HAVE AN APPLICATION ON FILE i AND, THROUGH HIS OWN PUBLIC ADMISSION, STATES THAT HE KNOWS ' ! I° ~ I NOTHING ABOUT THE OPERATION OF AN AIRPORT, AIRPLANES, OR E I AVIATION. AN EVEN CLOSER LOOK SEEMED AN INTERESTING EXERCISE. JUST ; I THE OTHER DAY I DROVE TO OUR AIRPORT ON OAK STREET. THAT IS AN EXPERIENCE IN ITSELF! I DROVE UP AIRPORT ROAD TO THE NEW 1 CONSTRUCTION TAKING PLACE AT THE NORTH END OF THE FIELD. THIS 1 CONSTRUCTION, NEW ROAD, BRIDGES, AND WHAT ALL WILL LINK HIGHWAY 360 WITH AIRPORT ROAD. A BRIEF CHAT WITH THE SUPERVISOR, OR FOREMAN REVEALED HIS PERCEPTION THAT "THIS 1 y° 1 1 I 0. R t 1 ROAD HAS THE VERY HIGHEST PRIORITY"! I'M SURE THAT NEWS WILL - COMFORT OAK STREET BUSINESSES AND RESIDEmrs. THE EXERCISE BECOMES MORE INTERESTING. A MAN IS APPOINTED TO OUR AIRPORT BOARD THAT STATES DURING A RECENT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MEETING HE WAS UNAWARE OF HIS SELECTION. A MAN IS APPOINTED TO OUR AIRPORT BOARD WHO DOTS NOT HAVE AN APPLICATION REQUESTING SUCH AN APPOINTMENT. A MAN IS APPOINTED TO OUR AIRPORT BOARD WHO STATES HE KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT AVIATION, AIRPLANES, AIRPORTS OR EVEN OF HIS CONSIDERATION FOR APPOINTMENT! WHY THEN THE APPOINTMENT? WELL, HE DOES OWN A VAST AMOUNT OF REAL ESTATE NORTH OF THc AIRPORT. HE DOES, IN FACT, OWN A VAST AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TO SOON BE SERVED BY THE NEW ROAD BEING CONSTRUCTED, A ROAD LINKING NOWHERE TO NOTHING! NOW ISN'T THIS BECOMING MORE INTERESTING? j NEGATIVE PERCEPTIONSt YES WE HAVE NEGATIVE PERCEPTIONS. WE Ili HAVE THIS FOOLISHNESS BEING DISCUSSED IN THE NORTH TEXAS AVIATION COMMUNITY. WE HAVE BUSINESSES STIFLED, OBSTRUCTED, INHIBITED AND HARASSED. WE HAVE NEGATIVE PRESS IN OUR NEWSPAPER. WHY, IIOW, WHAT FOR? PERHAPS THOSE QUESTIONS ARE DISCUSSED AND ANSWERED DURING YOUR "SECRET" AIRPORT BOARD MEETINGS. IT SHOULD BE OBVIOUS THAT THIS PARTICULAR APPOINTMENT NEEDS INVESTIGATION. IT SHOULD BE OBVIOUS THAT THE ENTIRE QUESTION OF OUR-MUNICIPAL. AIRPORT, IT'S REPUTATION AND ATMOSPHERE NEEDS LOOKINt3 INTO. IT SHOULD BE OBVIOUS THAT ell- k P SOMEWHERE, SOMEONE IS RESPUNSIPLE. IF YOU MR. MAYOR, COUNCIL MEMBERS, ARE NOT WELL INFORMED, WHY? WHAT IS GOING ON? HOW i LONG WILL YOU ALLOW THE SITUATION TO REMAIN AS IT APPEARS TODAY? HOW LONG WILL YOU ALLOW THIS PUDLIC FACILITY 10 GENERATE NEGATIVE PERCEPTIONS AMONG IT'S TENANTS, IT'S CUSTOMERS AND ITS POTENTIAL CLIENTS? HOW LONG WILL WF_ READ AND HEAR OF THE BIn3F.D BOARD APPOINTMENTS THROUGH OUT OUR CITY GOVERNMENTS? i ALSO FEEL STRONGLY THAT THIS APPOINTMENT NEEDS SERIOUS SCRUTINY BY THE MAYOR [,ND ENTIRE COUNCIL AS WELL AS THE CITY ATTORNEY. JUST EXACTLY WHY AND HOW WAS THIS APPOINTMENT MADE? _ I IT APPEARS TO ME THAT IT IS HARDER TO BECOME AN ACTIVE BOARD MEMBER THAN IT IS TO GET ELECTED TO YOUR OFFICES! I KNOW ALL OF YOU KNOW HOW VIVFICULT AND EXPENSIVE THAT IS! I WOULD BE GLAD TO MEET WITH ANY OF YOU TO DISCUSS THE AIRPORT FURTHER IF YOU ARE INTERESTED. THIS IS ONLY ONE BOARD AND ONLY ONE SEPT ON A BOARD 1 AM REFERRING TO, PERHAPS YOU SHOULD BE LOOKING AT ALL OF YOUR ADVISORY BOARDS FOR ANY POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. i 1 KNOW THAT ALL OF YOU HAVE MANY MORE IMPORTANT ISSUES THAN THIS TO DEAL WITH, BUT IF ALL YOU GET FOR BOARD MEMBERS IS PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN PICKED SY THE HIRED HELP RATHER THAN THE ELECTED OFFICIALS THEN GOOD GOVERNMENT WILL NEVER RISE ABOVE ANYTHING BUT AVERAGE WHEN IT SHOULD BE THE EXAMPLE OF ' I ' I i EXCELLENCE. PLEASE LET ME CLARIFY WHAT I FEEL CONSTITUTES THE HIRED HELP, THAT IS ANYONE IN THE EMPLOYEE OF THIS CITY 'THAT IS NOT ELECTED TO OFFICE. THANK YOU LADIES AND GENTLEMEN FOR YOUR TIME AND PAl'IENCE, I AM STILL INTERESTED IN ATTEMPTING TO SERVE THE NEEDS OF THIS AIRPORT AND CITY. i i ee CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUISS June 26, 1990 The Council convened into the work Session at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Boyd; Council Members Ayer, Gorton, Hopkins and Trent. ABSENT: Council Member Alexander 1. The Council received reports and discussed issues relating to the Uppat Trinity Regional Water District. Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that the purpose of hip presentation would be to review the history and purpose of the Upper Trinity Regional Water District, to alert Council to pending action relating to the Upper Trinity Regional Water District which included membership in the Upper Trinity Regional Water District, the Sulpher River Water Resolution and the interim tiastewater contract with the Upper Trinity Regional Water District for service to Argyle, the Ray Roberts Water plant joint ownership agreement and Denton's participation in selected pipelines with the Upper Trinity Regional Water District. He asked that Council provide direction to either confirm previously established positions or receive additional direction regarding membership to the Upper Trinity Regional Water District, joint ownership, pipeline participation, long-range water supplies, and a review of the schedule for the Ray Roberts water plant. Nelson reviewed the history of the Ray Roberts water system. As the Ray Roberts plant was started in the early 1980'x, many of the area communities asked Dallas and Denton for water, j Denton had established a position that it wanted to retain its own water. It did not want to get into the business of selling water rights. All of the cities were in need of water as they were all on ground water and needed to get on surface water. Dallas had taken the approach in the early 1980's that they would provide the raw water or treated water to the river basin which included all of Denton County except for a small portion. As the years went along, Dallas began wanting to back off of the commitment. Denton's concerns regarding being a regional water supplier included (1) water rights - possible loss of water rights to customer cities, (2) the high cost of a new plant, (3) rate disputes, and (4) the risks involved with customer cities. Denton's options included being a regional water supplier, being a customer of a regional water supplier or encouraging the development of a regional water system to be a partner with Denton in a new plant. In the winter of 1986-87, a county-wide steering committee was developed with 25 members which obtained funding from the committee. In the Spring of 1987 a consulting engineering firm was hired to assess the regional needs and in the Spring of 1987 Denton applied to the Texas water Development Board to fund half of the study. At that time, Denton was asked to be the contracting entity to do the study. 7rJ City of Denton City Council Minutes June 26, 1990 r > Page 2 i By the spring of 1988 the report was received and in the Summer of 1988 a citizens task force was formed to present the concept to the region. Denton and Lewisville created the Upper Trinity Municipal Water Authority and the steering committee continued to serve a guiding role. Legislation was developed in the Fall of 1988, approved by area cities and adopted in the Spring of 1989. In June of 1989 the Upper Trinity Regional Water District was formed and the Upper Trinity Municipal Water Authority was dissolved. The purposes of the Upper Trinity Regional Water District were: county-wide regional water planning, development of long-range raw water supplies, assistance in securing return flow water rights for Denton County entities, provided water treatment and pipeline systems, provided waatewater treatment and pipeline systems, regional sold waste facility, regional hazardous/liquid waste f astorm vailable ter only facilities, control and monitoring, services wasTrinity ownedi the rWater requested, and participation major Upper District as voluntary. to the return water flow. JJi return within flow 1 legislative if the would or a Hopkins the Council courts Member rights. 1 Nelson replied that the Legislature would probably force the I decision on the Texas Water Commission. I , i He continued that there were two types of memberships in the Upper Trinity Regional Water District. A contract membership li provided a r.wo year eligibility, membership on the Board and provided ar, option to become a participating member. The participating membership was for entities participating in projects, provided for membership on the Board and was also for entities participating in special facility bonds. Board members consisted of eight members carried Board m from the Upper Trinity Municipal Water Authority, one for each contract member and one board member for each participating member. The term of office was four years and were appointed by the City Council. The County had one at-large member with an option for one additional member if the Board requested. Voting control consisted of one vote per member on general issues and a weighted vote on projects. Cities with population over 500000 had one additional vote. Upi.er Trinity Regional Water District major activities included (1) Little Elm Wastewater Treatment Plant, (2) Dnt n Water Plant project, (3) Sulphur River Water, (4) Argyle contract, and (5) Ground Wate: Study Committee. I , .r.. I City of Denton City Council Minutes June 26, 1990 Page 3 Nelson stated that the Upper Trinity Regional Water District's service plans consisted of serving 10 entities, participating in Denton's 10 MGD Ray Roberts Plant, building/participating with Lewisville in a south plant, participating in Denton's water line to Denton and in Denton's booster station, and building pipelines. Denton's future raw water requirements and supplies, ` requirements for drought conditions ink! water supply for growth were review by Nelson. Alternatives presented included (1) buying from Dallas which might mean too t,i h for terp piping pumping costs to increase and a supply only untilw2030, i (2) Sulphur River Basin with a relatively low cost of Commerce water, the need to participate with others, future legal battles, and future develop~ents/participation, (3) Texoma which had poor quality water, Dallas would resist or prohibit and the water cost was very low, and (4) re-use water which would cost very little, involve legal battles and the public might not accept the concept. { Nelson then reviewed the Cooper Reservoir water. The water was owned by North Texas Municipal Water District, Irving, Sulphur River Municipal Water District, Commerce, Sulphur Springs, and Cooper. Commerce and the Upper Trinity Regional Water District had signed an agreement for Commerce to sell 11.7 MGD for 50 years. Nelson presented the estimated 1991 budget for the Upper Trinity Regional water District and the anticipated source of funds. Advantages and disadvantages of the Cooper Reservoir Water included (1) the water's relatively low cost, (2) it would provide water for 10,000 people, (3) it would give Denton an opportunity to develop a presence in other regional water i; sources, (4) there would be legal battles, (5) if Denton did not participate other Denton County cities would assume Denton 's share, (6) if successful, the Upper Trinity Regional Water District would reimburse the City $42,000 and (7) if unsuccessful, Denton would not recoup $83,325. Nelson stated that in his opinion, it was the worth the risk to try and get the Cooper Reservoir water. Council Member Hopkins felt that it was necessary to talk about the Cooper Reservoir pros and cons and perhaps needed superior legal advisement in Austin. Was what Denton would get worth the cost. s Mayor Castleberry asked when an answer was needed. Nelson replied approximately one month. I ~ I I i Ile- t City of Denton City Council Minutes June 26, 1990 Page 4 The Council then convened into the Special Call Session at 7:00 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room. I PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Nayor Pro Tem Boyd; Council Members Ayer, Gorton, Hopkins and Trent. ABSENT: Council Member Alexander 1. The Council discussed and considered approval of a recommendation from the Park and Recreation Board concerning a request from the St. Emmanuel Baptist Church to hold a bazaar in Fred Moore Park. (The Park and Recreation Board considered the request at its meeting of June 25, 1990.) Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that the Parks Board considered the request on June 25 and recommended to Council that permission be granted and that the fee be waived. Hopkins motioned, Gorton seconded to grant the request. On roll vote, Trent 'aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye,' Boyd layer' and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 2. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters (considered agreement in Golden Trian le Joint Venture 6 Pe o s Mann Moe & Jack vs.~CCty r tea { estate, an personae Boar appo ntments se a discussion and considered appointments to all City of Denton Boards and Commissions). No official action was taken. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned. j f 1 BOB CASTLF EE?R , MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS JENNIFER W ALTERS CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 3281c I l 00 h f t CITY C0UNCIL I IT L t- ~I r 1 I. i T +F I 1 ~ 11 1 i I i li .r' .I I 499 4 $o~~O o r c , OCb . a r,P Q PC N t OQO~ °0oaco~cco~' I . r 1 I F ~~J I Y ' Nr S r E f CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council I j FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager t SUBJECT: Approval of a tax refund to Harold R. Gore a RECOMMENDATION: The Tax Department has mailed an Overpayment Letter and an Application for Refund to the taxpayer. All completed forms and necessary documents.- 1 tion have been returned, requesting this refund, which the Tax Technician i recommends. SUMMARY: yap er 31,11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $ 500.00. Mrs. Harold R. Gore has requ,~6ted a refund in the amount of $ 10287,78, because she made duplicate payments en City Account # 4040-00900. BACKGROUND: n e ruary 27, 1990, Mrs. Harold R. Gore made two payments on her account, each in the amount of $ 1,287.78. Tax records indicate payments of $ 2,575.56 against a tax base of $ 1,287.78. A tax refund is due. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: 1 ' The Tax Department and the tax account of Harold R. Gore + FISCAL IMPACT: R $ 10287.78 RESPE ULLY SUB TED- I ` oy arre f City Manager Prepared by: Name c Schneider r Title Tax Technician I Approved: Vale Harla erson Title Tre e 2633C/3 I I - i ~ I Y` r{ tais Prop" Too Boars IbWnd Apf atloe 71.11(019) APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND Collecting Office Namr. 1 f ~t7 n- T e 7' Collecting Tax For, 1 ax ng o2/S 1 e aD Address City, State, Zip Code •wr - wry Yr_..r rwr In order to apply for a tax refund, the following Information must be provided by the taxpayer. IOENTIFICATIO OF PRO PITY OW!ER: Name; a.0 ~7 /P. 09W! RR: Address' - ) V- X. H'1 r-7 J art e r, 7 0i Telephone Number Of additional Information Is needed IDENTIFICATION PROPERTY: f Sy>''e~ 2 • Q eel f0 r► 481oak a 4D Description of Property, T Address or Locen„m of a.r,'..e~ Account Number of Properly ~1 /~-GbS'CCS or Tax Receipt Numbec - i, INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXEI: Name of Taxing Unit Year for Amount of From Which Refund Which Refund Oats of the Amount of Tax Refund Is Requated N Requested Tax Payment Taxes Paid Requested 1 1.A 19~ Or~/1990 = 7LIV 1 .492 21 19 119 ~ ~ ! (~7f1 1. 19~ /19_ I ` Taxpayer's reason for refund (attach supporting documentallonY. I ~h ea^rOr an o;-a7 -f0, lQ rl~iDrer Ceoroel ! orC-// e- Lem eft-11 hereby apply for the refund of the abov"*4rib4 taxes and c"fy that the Information I have given on this form Is true anpd Correct", Signature r- Date of Application for Tax Refund • 1 r r wart r -w r r r OITIHMINATION FOR TAX REFUND: Approval Disapproval t Signature of Authorl:ed Officer Dale Signature of Presiding Other(s) of Taxing Date Unit(s) for refund applications over 1601) Any Person Wo mahse a Nee entry utaen Me is aOatng Hater ebel be subject lease oftiw 1,10wN+0 oensfOss; 1. Mn1•IM41" w of net mere Men 10 yore ear lea Men 1 years and/or a be of eel men MM 10,000 or beth eueb One end ImpeNemnMk 1• eeMlossim In Joist a term uF W 1 year was" nst le Sneed 11,000 er ►eM rash One and bn/deennwrd a M forth In Ieatien I7:10, Penal Cede. MFUNe 7111 1 I 1 7T-- 7Z- I t i BETROLD ENTERPRISES. INC. 5845 DAA 1ENDER'E music CO. au S. ELM ST. 617-66-0221 . DENTONo TEXAS 76201 PAV Youlmost OF let ;a*j iqtq ~s _ ~~:b tv$2 5 0-00 00 i , 1900584Sao *I:11&902&491: 190000067 206' 6000001 2$776OP I I I 'I l I r I i j V ~RMre I~ r l r v, t S f i I • I ~ f CS6C100004},,k410 -$+Z -eta 1110 314 Los N mooo i ` j i ~ I r i I 1 ~ r r KnOLD OMMISES. INC. 5 8 2 5 DDA FENDER'S MUSIC CO. 214 9. ELM ST. W-952.0921 rr DENTON. TEXAS 7!201 L eL~q_1990 PAY -e e) ROOF $ 00 AAS ti~t•~t•Ilw~r•iMIM..lYM A1Pw~MY1► fj (f 0vile - a Qnclo ► i x +'OG15B25Mos:i~L902L491. x'00000 ?53 w 100000244555,•' 1 t F (e. s♦ r eG6ETooooo fo } . 1110005114 L ~low 1 r y I y~ ~~~W i., 1 i I l I i ~ I , 3 I t t C t r 4 • • • xx ♦ • L •♦a 5h b / 1~1 Ic1y`11 7t • V! r 2 Z~ -519 pa y • > • > w r NI! # i r r V N rr L~A • • • r • • • • • • • • • , . • • • . • • • • • • . • • • • As • • i i r Jr r r ~ r EMI r r •i N I~~ ♦ • fli 4 E • r r . . . • • • • . • . • •~~•pp • . . • rq4 r• . . . • • • • • • • . . . i 1 1 1 1 7- II 1 1 1 off 1 t 11 N 1 Moog r 4 ~ •.•rr . •r . r. Rwg r 6.444 $sold *4 r i i i 1 -W YR Id - I Ole e F r ITY COUNCIL I t+ll a off: n + a k tt4Tp04 440n~ ^L60~d { i r«cv~ t CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council { FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT. Approval of a tax refund to Penders Music Store i RECOMMENDATION: The 'fax Department has mailed an Overpayment Letter and an Application for Refund to the taxpayer. All completed forms and necessary documenta- tion have been returned, requesting this refund, which the Tax Technician recommends. SUMMARY: Chapter 31,11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $ 500.00. Penders Music Store has requested a refund in the amount of $ 1,157.77, because they made duplicate payments on City Account # 9160-01100. BACKGROUND; n e- raary 27, 1990, Penders Music Store made two payments on their account, each in the amount of $ 1,157.77. Tax records indicate payments. of $ 2,315.54 against a tax base of $ 1,157.77. A tax refund is due. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: 3 The Tax Department and the tax account of Penders Music Store. FISCAL IMPACT: $ 1,157.77 t RESP ULLYUB TED oy Harrell City Manager Prepared by: Name Vic Schneider Title Tax Technician Approved: j Name ar a rson 4 Title Tre } 2633C/3 a t s ti r. r yEM. NH"I.i~ r 4 I Slat* Property rag eo..e APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND ndund Applkafinlbn 3`1.111(442) i 1I Collecting Office Namr, C 71 Ta Collecting Tax For. S G a~ ng n a , Address !n k4 E City, State, Zip Code i w Ar In order to apply for a tax refund, the following Informstion must be provided by the taxpayer, - IDENTIFICATION PROPERTY OWNER: Name: Address: Telephone Number (if additional Informatlon Is needed): - IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: Description of Property:n.~ Address or location of Property 1 Account Number of ~rao.rtr T~Ly//p~, I or Tax Receipt Number; INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES: Name of Taxing Unit Year for From Which Refund Which Refund Date of the Amount Amount of n N Requesled Is Requested Tax Pay Taxes Payment tax" Tex Refund Paid Requested t. y CLA2/ to ZlZ 2. 1] ~j 9 ' ZS_ 3. Mfg ! 1Q $ S I Taxpayer's reason for refund (attech supporting documentallony: TBed-ps-_ µeo-g- joi7iff/ e r In error, S ~e ~ie is rG4.e~;t Y'QYan y~ f_1 e__ OP1 ~e / "I hereby apply for the refund al ti+e sbove4escribed taxes and Canty that" Information I have given on this form Is true and correct 712 Signature ication for Tax Refund 4 t ts~' Zlr~. / Dale of Appit L1i'.rsQO l f+ I DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND: Approval Disapproval I Signature of Authorized Offkor t. I Date Signature of Presiding Offlcer(s) of Taxing Data ` Unlgy for refund applications over $500 Any Preen whe *Mee a IWN entry tippr 1M hregeleN reear eksA b suiyeel ro see ef 1M nilso, ol mnre 14M 10 ycan mw lies then 9 w o t. Irn~Meenment en sod/of a Ana at not mare P" 0,000 000 ooo or bew am* Ana and d fmprlsenn,ent A, conAmon" In )sA kY a lens up Is t roarer a Ana nol to *wood $&NO or doM woh Ans and IrnprlPw~ at sM I forth In fifths" 31.10, Penal Cede, t Y BETROU ENTERPRISES. INC. 5843 DBA PENDER'S MUSIC CO. 314 8. ELM S7. 417-307-0271 DENTON, TEXAS T0201 PAY 2 6 IS OR.. Or n7- a,r.~w• e. i..e...m,,,.» OLLARS , t t O I a00564~M®I;~LL902~~,g1. w000006 7 5 2 w o'OOOOLi57771' i f i lop i i J i } roe x 111000314 • VA ON a l N-, > I ' ~ j I ~ ~~'+~+a:x~:~ • ,c'w't! +d . . . ,1 ~ j • ~ ~ t 'k I I l N I f 1 - 1 I r id hlr1 ~ 1 i I t IMOID ENMPRIOES, INC. 5825 , ODA MOER1 MUSIC CO. su S. ELM /T. NT-i/I.Oitt DIWON, rom Isul MY o%oilo~ J $ ~C~LtA11• . y • w.MwYaw.~1a1~ ' I K I OB ~ ~ I ~ .a • r V k'00582s'0m,:LLL902L44ii x00000 75 le 040000244555 milmommumomm ` l F ~ J I { wnmi f k I , 111000614 ob $ -ZO .1 _ I Mfr I _ ! ~ ~,irti ('f C(C tt ,y r Q h16? I,i FTiy f ~ ~ ~ ~ I F ~ f I I T I I ~ I ~ ' i Irv<,. I h Ye ♦ ti~ I I f0. wow Y, rr MM bi 4' m is .k m b w ii bb a r 06 b A A P% i -Fl, 7-7 1 I ~ ♦HR-.r 1r1►1Y i~I' rl i CITY COUNCIL .sr u 7:711= FIT I I 'IF I IT I. I 'IT F. I IT 4 O1 C l0 E4~CJ ~~~OCOGLGG~~~ t i II V L 1 I~ i l a 6 2651L-1/3689 ' NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR TILE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE. OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equip- ment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated emplnyee has reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and WHEREAS, the'City Council has provided in the City Budget for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted herein; NOW, THEREFORE, ' 7"A E COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the numbered items in the following numbered bids Torma eriels, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the I "Bid Proposals" on file in the Office of the City's Purchasing Agent filed According to tho bid nu:ober assigned thereto, are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids for such items: BID ITFM NLMBER NO. VENDOR AMOUNT l III 1125 _ ALL Hytorc-Texas _ $15,195.00 >1 I 1 k n✓'v w t s ~Y r SECTION If. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numberaT~te,ne of the submitted bide, the City accepts the offer of the persons subm!ttinli the bids for such items and agrees to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations Bid tt~ Proposals, and relate.! i ocuments. SECTION 111. That should the City and persona submitting approved `anT accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into n formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bide the City Manager or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that ►he written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums containeA in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein approved and accepted. SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered-'- mF of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the a pproved bids or pursuant to a written contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTIO,' V. That this ordinance shall become effective C immeaiately-t, n its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1.1990. BOB CASTLEBERRY? MAYOR ATTEST: J€MWER I)MI RF , -CIT'Y` c T tY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY t. BY: PAGE TWO i i' p1 1 1 DATES August 7, 1990 r CITY COUNCIL REPORT TOs Mayor and Members of the City Council 1 FRO21s Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTS BID #«1125 HYDRAULIC TORQUE MACHINE RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest mid-der me©tTng specifications, Hytorc-Texas, in the amount of $15,195.00. SUMMARY: This bid is for two square drive hydraulic torque machines and an Electrical Hydraulic Pumping Unit, for use by the Electric i'u,Qr.ction Department in disassembly of steam turbines. HACKGROUNDs Tabulation Sheet, and Memorandum from Jim Thune. PROGRAKS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Production FISCAL 1MPACTs Budgeted Account #610-080-0251-9211 i Respectfully submitted: i I Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by, Names Den se Mann ng Titles Senior Buyer , 4 rJ~: M.t • ~ W N ~ I . y 01 M oy J td L?l +-3 H t+ y r CC ~ w ~ 0 M H b q o H z ~ ~ 1 I - ~r Ul W N 'C; n" {I~ F-A l0 , 8 I 0 ~ ' y x o p p o_.- o. p o ,r W C7 O O O O O O O O O d W y en H N 0 W" o w o ~ n o o p b p p p b O O O i j i i mil roe- ~wM S y CON FL44-10JUL z ~ 1990 oftAt, C1TY of DEWON, TEXAS 215 E. MCKINNEY/ DENTON, TEXAS 78201 / TELEPHONE (817) W8200 TO: Denise Manning, Senior Purchasing Agent FROM: Jim Thune, Electric Production Superintendent DATE: July 26, 1990 RE: BIO 011261 HYDRAULIC TORQUE MACHINE Denise, regarding Bid 01126, Hydraulic Torque Machine, Please accept the low indicated bid of $16,196.00 from Bob McFadden of Hytorq in Spring, Texas. Thank you R JT/ks 07260009 y' i i I~ r CITY COUNCIL a f- q If p0C 1 0 r ° N S IL pp0~ oOQ~~'Ql1 I j rd!, • KrM 4 2516L-7/1589 Cf/F.1. NU. A14 ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR TIIE EXPENDITJRE OF FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, F,QUIPMENT, SUPPLIES Oft SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIO14S OF STATE LAW EMAPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, i WIIF.REAS, state law and ordinance require that certain I contracts requirin an expenditure or payment by the City in an amount exceeding 10,000 be b competitive bide, except in the case of public calamity wliere it becomos necessary to act at once to appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to preserve the property of the city, or it is necessary to protect the public health of the citizensi of the city, or in case of unforeseen damage to public property, machinery or equipment; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1, That the City Council hereby determines that there is a pu5T;c`calnmit', that makes it necessary to act at once to appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to preserve the property of the city, or to protect the public health of the citizens of the city, or to provide for unforaeen damage to public property, machinery or equipment, and by reason thereof, the following emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services, as described in the "Purchase Order" attached hereto, are hereby approved: PURCHASE ORDER NLIIBER VENDOR AMOUNT a 98902 _ J 8 S Egui meat _ 12 000.00 98963 ~Itonc Engineers 22,089.75 SECTION II. That because of such emergency, the City Manager or e~gnated` employee is hereby authorized to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services :s described in the attached Purchase Orders and to make payment therefore in the amounts therein stated, such emergency purchases being in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases by the City fro,a the requirements of competitive bids. h 7~ -7 t r 4 SECTIO14 Ill. That this ordinance shall become effective immea ate y upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ___p1990. BOB CASTLEBERRYt MAYOR V, ATTEST: f` F 7EFt~I lt'AAL'f" OR MAY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAM DRAYOVITCNt CITY ATTORNEY r - 4 BY: - IIF - { ` 11 p PAGE TWO i MR.M VI` F1 w f I DATE$ August 7,1990 i CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO= Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT; PURCHASE ORDER #90905 - RONE ENGINEERS h RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend this Purchas Eng veers n the amount of $22,089.75 be approved e Order to Rone , SUM14ARY1 This Purchase Order is to pay (3) three invoices for Geotechnical work, to prepare soil and liner evaluation reports for submittal to the Texas Department of Health, This is a requirement to assure certification of the liner at the Landfill. BACKGROUNDS Memorandum from Charles Watkins, PROGRAMS DEPARTMENT OR CROUPS AFFECTEDs Solid Waste/Sanitation D epaal epartment, FISCAL IMPACTI Budgeted Account #630-024-0803-8502 Rtspectfully submittedo Lloy V. Harrell Prepared bye City Manager Names Dan se Mann ng Titles Senior Buyer ~w - f t i Ole f ~rrM. q ,Wy ~ f s t f wry Of DENTON / 215 E. McKinney / Denton, Texas 76201 i M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: Tan Shaw, Purchasing Agent FROM: Charles Watkins, Superintendent, Solid Waste Division "i DATE: July 12, 1990 i SUBJECT: ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE LANDFILL 1 Two purchase requisitions have been forwarded to you for engineering services from Rone Engineers. The services are for the Geotechnical work which mist be accomplished to prepare Soil N3 Liner Evaluation Reports (SLER) for submittal to the Texas Department of Health (TOH) to I obtain certification of the bottom and sldewall liners at the landfill prior to the placement of garbage upon the liners In accordance with TDI regulations. One requisition is in th9 amount of $4,911.75 and the other Is for I $170178,00. It Is estimated that the total charges for engineering i services will be approximately $35,000.00 In conjunction with develop- meet of the latest area for fill operations. This is the largest area which has been excavated and lined to date, consisting of approximately 3.2 acres. Excavation and lining of this large area was a requirement oft TDH compliance schedule, J ~ 1 Charles S. Watkins CSw/sc i xc: R. E. Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities Bill Angelo, Director of Comim ity Services I I 1 Awvr f~ DATEI August 7, 1990 TOE CITY COUNCIL REPORT i i FRO" 41 Mayor Y and Members of the City Council = Lloyd v, Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTS PURCHASE ORDF,R 098902 - J S Equipment Service Ord -U 6OS Equipment,Mein themestim be approved, Ynt of this emergency Purchase ated amount of $12SU"' Ryt pl,{© purchase finder steer ng and transmission for Iq for the e of Denton Landfill, n 973 track loader e u repair the the work in '~t++o track loaders aneeded to complete Memoal~gfiorchasr) Order John Lobaughg8902, Request for Purchase #129871. _PROORA;10 DEPARTMEI~fI Department, O-RGROUP3 AF_ Fg~Epz Equipment Services r ' 1?I • FISCACT= Working Capital Account 0710-025-0580-8720 Respectfully submlttedr Frepaxed bYr Ci Yla d v' Harrell Y Manager Names ben se Mann ng Titles Sanior Buyer r f w a n,.•~.. w t ~ c,a4 r y r O yN N fill 10, 1 Q1 " 0 C r l4 ° o k UN k7r t[ Ln N 7 o Al JV1 j H 4 O VN < O N N y rx~ 0 Ri o ° z x ~ A A prw a ~ n " O M-4 z` H7 n n a (11on i o O m z t3,1 g n anw r" rt Y, b ro s+ n ° t~ n [l ~ sr o n o o a y B~ H ' + • ~ ~ it H Z N P ~ O u IJ MM 00 NN o c O 00 co O 1 OO O ]I ~1 I i ~ ~ 60 c r, 11 11 v.~.r I-*- law n ~C ~ ~ ran•c 1 or 't 91 T T 1 0 M ONISVN)ilnd YO! SVS11V OSN93T1)S A1N 'r CITY Of DENTON / 215 E. McKinney / Denton, Texas 76201 M E M O R A N D U M TO: 8111 Angelo, Director of Camtjntty Services Charles S. Watkins, Superintendent/Solid Waste Division FROM: John Lobsugh, Supervisor/Laidflll DATE: July 240 1990 SUBJECT: 973 Track Loader On 7/16/90, the loader wns not steering properly, and after examination by JSESI mechanics, it was detennlned a m for problem. The problem is in the steering punp, and without going Into the transmission, further problems are not known. Ozzie Tate told me without authorization, the machine cannot be fixed. Due to the fact that " are going to have to move some existing garbage on the north side of the just completed pit, It will have to be done with a track machine. If the garbage has to be moved to the west as suggested, then we will need two track machines to complete this in any sort of minimal time frame. ; The estimated time to fix the 973 Is seven to ten days from time the machine Is transported, If we receiver certlflration from the Health Department, we will need to start rm the slcping as soon as possible and will need the machine at that time. Any delay will delay the completion of that particular job. John L augh Supervisor/Landfill JL/capl 7sw07749JJ1 4r 1 a p CITY ME- - CC►'tTNCIL 44- J+ i Eli i C'j r ~ ~ 1 OOOQC ' G 0~ I I I' F~: G ~ 2517L/1589 / A peeve. 7 NO. AN ORDINA11CE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CHANGE ORDER TO A r CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND White Glove PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE CONTRACT-gAIC EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on N•,jvember 11 89 , the City awarded a contract for the construction o~ certa n mpr'ovements to White G;. vQ Bid f1014 in the amount oF-Ke l ; an WHEREAS, the City Manager having recommended to the Council that a change order be authorized to amend such contract with o the compliance with sthee reand price quirements not said Chapter change 252of order the being ocal Government Code; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: SECTION 1. That the change order to the contract between the City an hate clove , a copy of which is attached eerre[-o; -5 - e amoun o Seven Tho Doll 00 a ere y approve ana t~ expen tuce of funds c or • ereby authorized. 1 SECTION 11. That this ordinance shall become effective immeaIR-a Ty upon its passage and approval. + PASSED AND APFROVED this the day of { 1990. BOB CASTLEDERRY, MAYOR ArrEST: JJ1 I APPR.OVF,D AS TO LEGAL FORM 3 DEBRA !►DAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY i BYs I j i 41 it r DATE: August 7,1990 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TOS Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager I SUBJECTS PURCHASE ORDER #9384) - CHANGE ORDER r RECOMMENDATIONt We recommend this change order for Purchase Order 793819 to White Glove in the amount of $7,000.00 be approved. SUMMARYt This change order is for janitorial services, which have increased, due to expansion and renovation of the Senior Center. This increase was discussed in the Bid #1014 and budgeted for by Building operators. White Glove has agreed to hold the price for cleaning the Senior Center so that it is comparable with other city buildings. M BACKGROUNDS Memorandum from Bruce Hennington. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTEDS Building Operations Department, I FIS%AL IMPACTS Budgeted Account #100-032-0002-8502 Respect ll/y/submitted: v Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared byt Names Denise Man Title: Senior Buyer f s w Ile- i I ti y s 7 Y membcion CITY of DENTON, TEXAS Civic Center/ 32t E. McKinney/ Denton, TX 76201 MEMORANDUM TO: Tcm Shaw, Purchasing Agent FROM: Bruce nenington, Superintendent of Building Operations SU&Twrl Change order, *ite Glove Cleaning Contract DATM July 20, 1990 This memo is to request a change order in the Mite Glove, 1989-90 contract for cleaning the Senior Center Annex. The change will take effect from the time of construction completicn to the end of September, 1990. The change is $7#000.00 and is in the 1989-90 budget (PC #93849, line 8), Thank you. Hen t qfi Donton Parks and Recreation / Denton, Texas / f8f 7) tidll•,l7O ; a ~ j111111 Icy.. n CITY r COUNCIL a s 0 a I 0N 1~ L40~ ~~aQCM, I rne.. a► i fJ', .r♦ Y' HIV . D CITY of omrom, TsxAs 215E. McKINNEYI DENTON, TEXAS 762011 TELEPHONE (817) 5648200 MEMORANDUM DATE: play 31, 1990 TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: Joan F. McGrane, Executive Director of Financ r SUBJECT: LONE STAR GAS FRANCIIISE AGREEMENI' Tae current franchise agreement with Lone S ar Gas is in effect until the year 2002. However, the agreement can be amended by mutual consent between the City and the Lone Star Gas Company. As part of the 1989-90 budget, an increase in the gas franchise tax from two (21) percent to three (31) percent was proposed. It is anticipated that the one (11) percent will generate an annual increase of approximately $50,000. As you may recall this amount will help to recoup the $15,000 lost by the University of North 'texas utilizing state gas rather tnan Lone Star Gas, We have met on several occasions with representatives frost Lone Star Gas and have worked out an agreement whereby the tax would increase from two (21) percent to three (31) percent of gross receipts. I snould note that the parties were not able to reach an agreement on quarterly payments; therefore, the annual payment schedule as called for in f the original agreement will remain, f In addition, I have enclosed a copy of the North Central Texas Council of Governments 1990 Municipal Fee Survey regarding franchise taxes/fees. As you can see from the chart, a number of cities in the metroplex are at four (41) percent, a few at three (31) percent 1 and soma still at two (21) percent. Denton, raising their fee on gross receipts from two (21) to tnree (31) percent, will still be lower titan a number of cities in the area. I would also like to point out that Denton does not charge industrial clients the franchise tax. If ju need any additional information, or have any further questions, please advise. JFMcG:af Enclosure I 526SF I f ~ I F II f~ i 1 I~88 Ii it un~mm11ununIuunnnnmu 3 HIM !99499 9 ' 9!9!! III III HIM 1111 9i!!99 9!9 0 Pffq T11TI I I TnL-FTT-1 I I oil ~9 ~ R t ~ g e T~ r ~AN />1161~ f If i i t S . 5 Clry Of DNNTON 1215 E. YcKfnney i [knton, Taxes MXI MEMORANDUM I~ DATE: August 14990 E TO: Lloyi V. Harrell, City Manager` f FROM: John P. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance SUBJECT: LONE STAR GAS FRANCHISE ORDINANCE I have reviewed the wording changes of the ordinance to change the Lone Star Gas Franchise with Councilman Boyd. I believe that we have satisfied his concerns. If you have any questions, please advise. E+ JFMCG:af 5333F I i !:a ,r w A" r , , S 1\ fYM.: N1Vtl~~ ! t tvrtrsx Y vyA Y k . I f1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON# TEXAS, AMENDING SECTION I.L' OF THE FRANCHISE GRANTED TO LANE STAR GAS COMPANY BY ORDINANCE NO. 82- 56 TO PROVIDE FOR AN AMENDED FRANCHISE FEE TO BE PAID BY LANE STAR GAS COMPANY FOR THE USE OF THE PUBLIC STREETS) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSs As of the effective date of this amendatory SECTION I. ordinance, and upon acceptance by Lone Star Gas Company of the provisions hereof, Section II of the aforesaid captioned franchise j ordinance enacted on July 20, 1982, shall be changed to substitute t a three percent (3%) gross receipts fee for the use of streets and alleys instead of two percent (2t'), as now provided in said section. The other provisions of Section it shall remain un- changed. SEr~ JON_~U. The terms and provisions or this amendatory ordinance shall be deemed to be severable, and if the validity of any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this amendatory ordinance should be declared to be invalid, the same shall not ; affect the validity of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this amendatory ordinance. ~ N III,. Except as heretofore and hereinabov® changed and apended, the teens, provisions, conditions and requirements of the aforesaid franchise ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTI4TL U. This amendatory ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its final passage and approval) pending such time the full text of this ordinance shall be published one each week for three consecutive weeks in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas. s I 1 Only gas sold by the company after the effective date of this ordinance shall be assessed at three percent (3t). The payment made for gas sales prior to the effective date of this ordinance shall remain at two percent (2t). Lone Star Gas Company shall file its written acceptance of this amendment to the franchise ordinance with the office of the city secretary of the City of Denton within thirty (30) days after v., its effective date and this ordinance shall be of no force and effect if not accepted within said period. 7 WAr-Ml I: Al PASSED AND APPROVED on first reading this the day of -r 1990. PASSED AND APPROVED on second reading this the day of 1990. PASSED AND APPROVED on third reading this the _ day of R 1990. a' 808 CASTLEBERRYO MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY i BY:, k ~ ff APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCK, CITY ATTORNEY i i BY: 0my--4 i ACCEPTtD: LANE SPAR GAS COMPANYO GRANTEE E BY 1.__ TImLE:---_ ATTEST: lonestar.2/7/19/90 PAGE 2 ; t+nw~ AI if V ; IRtYq ~ y CITY COUNCIL . UTT k ~x I . i t lot ` ~ o h t a. mom f u ol, (/0 1 ;t i CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT T0. Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Adoption of 1990 Edition of the National Electrical Code. t RECOMMENDATION; Approval I I SUMMARYS An ordinance amending Article I of Chapter 9 (Electrical Code) Of the Code of Ordinances ofthe City of Denton to provide for -I j adoption ofthe 1990 National Electrical Code; to provid additions thereto; provide fora penalt In the mount o for $2,000.00 for violations thereof; and providing for an effect- ive de:te AACKGftOUND i Electrical Code Board has reviewed the 1990 Edition ofthe National Electrical Code and current and recommends adoption. electrical ordinances J PAOGkAMI D e s -~_E~AkTMF, ,N_ T_~ Og GROUPS AFFEC'PEDt ~ Property owners, builders and electrical contractors i FISCl1L IMPACT: Little or no change from current ordinance i .i i f 1 0773E i 1(Y t s Minutes Electrical Code Board February 21, 1990 Present: Lance Spencer, Jim McClanahan, Jim Fobbing, Leonard Starnes Staff Present: Jackie Doyle, Building Official, Willie Williams, Electrical Inspector Absent: Clyde McWilliams 1. McClanahan moved and Starnes seconded a motion to approve the minutes of December 6, 1990 as written, with the exception that Jim Robbins' name be added to those indicated as being present. Motion carried unanimously, 2. The Board continued its review of the 1990 edition of the National Electrical Code as well as local ordinance requirements. Robbins asked if aluminum grounding conductors were permitted in Denton. Willie Williams stated that it was City policy not to permit aluminum grounding conductors although the N.E.C. does permit them. McClanahan moved and Robbins seconded a motion to amend Article 250 by deleting 1 reference to aluminum and copper-clad aluminuma grounding conductors. Motion carried unanimously. Willie Williams reviewed various code changes with Board members and Doyle reviewed the current ordinance with members. McClanahan moved and Starnes seconded a motion to recommend adopting of the 1990 edition of the National Electrical Code with all current amendments plus the deletion in Article 250 of any reference to aluminum or • copper-clad aluminum grounding conductors. Motion carried unanimously. III 3. No new business. Meeting adjourned at 10:07 a.m. 2309k f MK lily 6■ 1 1 9 t 1, i r y ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 9 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS PROVIDE FOR ADOPTION OF THE 1990 NATIONAL" ELECTRICAL CODE " TO CODE) AND OF AMENDMENTS TO THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE; TO PROVIDE rOR ADDITIONS THERETO; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITHt PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $20000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. , THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS= SECTSON j. That Section 9-1 of Article 1 of Chapter Nine of the, Code of Ordinances of the city of Denton, Texas is hereby amended to read as followst Bea, t-l. Adopting National Xleotrical code, logo rditiont deletions and amendments. I I The National Electrical Code, 1990 Edition, as recommended by the National Fire Protection Association, a copy of which shall be filed with the office of the City Secretary end available for' public inspection, is hereby adopted and designated as the oloctrical code of the City of Denton, Texas, the same as though said edition of such Code were copied at length herein, subject to thi deletions and amendments enumerated hereaftsrt ! I. Section 250-91. EhL~l~Qde r:ondw~t.. HatuLALp paragraph (a), to reed as to]lowst' the first sentence is hereby axe d The grounding electrode conductor shall be co , I Pper. 1. Section 250-92. Installs ;Q- hcreby amended to read as f---- os ' paragraph {a), is (slundina ~•~*rode Cond,n*,,,., A grounding J electrode conductor or its enolowure shall be securely fastened to the surface on which it is carried. A No. 4 (to for ur) copper or larger ccnduc- shall he protected if exposed to severe physi- cal damage. A No. 6 (six) grounding conductor that is free from exposure to physical damage shall be permitted to be run along the surface of crap otection where rittisnsecwithout Metal urely fastened torthe constructiont otherwise, it shall be in rigid metal conduit, intermediate metal conduit, rigid n)nmetallie conduit, electrical metallic tubing, 7 or cable armor. Grounding conductors smaller than No. 6 (six) shall be in rigid metal conduit, intermediate metal conduit, rigid nonmetallic conduit, %~lectrical metallic tubing, or cable armor. 3. Section 250-93. Size of Oirec*-Cu YYeTt system Grounding Conduc+or, paragraph (c), is hereby amended to a's read as follower (o) Not ee Smaller mhan No 8 (eight►, In no case the sh(eight) coopering conductor be smaller than No. 4. Section 250-94. Size of Alter nat~++g-(`urr•..4 ~ri.Lndinn Electrode Condo gr. Exception No. It Grounded ys ems, paragraph (a) and Exception No. 2: Unaroundsd systey~, paragraph (a) are hereby amended to read as follower J Exception No. It Grounded Svstems, II (a) Where connected to made electrodes as in Section 250-83 (o) or (d), that portion of the grounding electrode conductor which is the sole connection to the grounding electrode shall not be required to be larger than No. 6 (six) copper wire. Exception No. 2t Ungroun_ded Svstems, (a) Where connected to made electrodes an in Section 250-83(c) or (d), that portion of the grounding electrode conductor which is the sole I connection to the groundi.>q electrode shall not be Ii required to be larger han No. 6 (six) copper wire. 5. Table No. 250-94, Groundina F •^tw^Ae Conductor tor Ac systems is hereby amended by deleting the second and fourth columns which relate to aluminum or copper-olad aluminum conductors. 6. Section 250-95. Size et Eauinment rounding ends tore, the first sentence is hereby amended to read as follower The size of copper equipment grounding conductors shall not be less than given in Table 250-95, t. PAGE 2 _VMT ;J l • ~rY 5 J r i• hereby 0 7. Table No. 250-95. 41i nri,iors for GrOUnair►a and E~i11ZID,4 deleting the third column and footnote amended by copper-clad aluminum. relating to aluminum and 8. Section 250-07 is hereby amended to read as follows: 250-97. QUtj l LightjnS[• Isolated noncurrent- carrying metal parts of outline lighting systems ether by a No. shall permitted conductor protected from 14 hysical (fourteen) damage, where a conductor complying with p p Section 250-95 is used to ground the group. 'n Duct■ Plenum- a-_ d:~ athsr 9. Section 300-22. aragraph (o), n*h~er Sn'a^e ~T~- se-- ~O _v,.n~tl{na Snaceir p ~.{rnnmental_&it, Exception No. 5 is hereby amended to read aL followss Excetion No. 5t This the joist or stud paces section in dwelling uniteinclude i 10. Section 105-6. nd Fay+lt Protection Lor Person- nil, paragraph (a) is hereby amended to read as followss All 125- (a) Q:aingl hose, 15- and 20-ampere receptacle volt, art of the permanent wiring s of which the are not building a or structure ind which ate in use by employees shall have grounSfault circuit-interrupter protection for p Providing ground-fault circuit-interrupter y of the I protection shall he the outlet pandibhist employer employes using t arsons are ~ without regard to whether such p perforaing electrical work or are engaged in soma othor trade on the promises. cF~,,~,N iI, ';'hat Section 9-6(c) of Article 1 of Chapter Nine of the Code o! Ordinances of the City of Denton is hereby amended to read as follows copper-clad aluminum wire smaller (c) Aluminum wire than No. 2 AWa shall and be cop pinhibited. Aluminum wars and O and copper. clad aluminum wire re No. connectors 2 AWand t lrmin is may be used only with app PAGE 3 i f ~T w,~ ICI L I A I~ SEC2_.3. All ordinances or arts of ordinance in when the provisions of this ordinance become eff ctive swhichoare iinnconsithisstent ordor in ance aref hereby i repealed terms the extent provisions of contained conflict. any suchI SECTION U. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the require- ments thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion I thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be punished within the limits above. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. I PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1990. ~ j BOB CASTLEBERkV MAYOR A17TEST t JRNNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY3 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCB, CITY ATTORNEY BY I 1 PAGE 4 a ` f I q, P k,, .:.r~ CITY P fill: COUNCIL .11, 1 If .11. 1 11 Fill : IF I I 1 ~ I ~ ' oorp0 ~r o # ~O f 0 CC4T a ~O~OCOF. .44 Till I.F... t J Y1 1 a4 L I I IV I 1 e N i1 F1 t I` CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: No parking on Ponder Street RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval SUMMARY: Staff is requesting an ordinance for 'No Parking' on both sides of Ponder Street from its intersection with Panhandle Street to a point approximately 200 feet north of Panhandle Street. BACKGROUND: This section of Ponder Street is very narrow and when cars are parked on one or both sides, traffic maneuverability is severely impaired. Ponder is a school bus route as well as a SPAN trolley route. i PROGRAMSt DEPARTMENTS, OF. GROUPS AFFECTED: Engineering and Traffic Division, Police Department i f FISCAL IMPACT: Signs and markings of about $200.00 1 I 0713E 1 JI ~ l I 1 F,~ i Y . MINUTES k Citizens Traffic Safety Support April 30, 1990 PRESENT: Carl Guess, Alice Gore, Doug Chadwick, Mike Amador, Marilyn ttt Smith and Chairman, Gene Gohike ABSENT: Betty sure:, John Erwin, and Prances 6aforte STAFF PRESENT: Paul Iwuchukwu, Traffic Engineer ITEM I1 APPROVE MINUTES OF MARCH S 1990• Doug "hadwick made a motion to approve the minutes as written. harLin Smith seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. ITEM 12 NO PARKING ON PONDER STREET: Paul Iwuchukwu presented the request. He said this request was brought to staff by the resident on 1122 Panhandle at the northeast corner of Panhandle and Ponder - Mr. Jim Curry. His request was only for the section between Panhandle and the creek. j Staff tried to handle the situation from a system approach I which is to include other areas that may warrant no parking in the future. As you are going north, Ponder narrows from Eagan to the creek between Panhandle and Broadway. Staff attempted _ to make that long section 'no packing' on the east side from Eagan to the crea;: and 'no packing' on the weer side from I Panhandle to the crook. i Staff was unsuccessful in winning the .uooorts of the residents of 720 and 716 Ponder, and 1122 Egan Drive. On the southwest Cotner of Panhandle and Ponder, there is an apartment building - 715 Ponder. The owner of the building said he has no off-street parking for some of his tenants so they have to park on the street. Therefore, staff decided to remove the section from Egan to Panhandle from the request. The cesidual request is for 'no parking' on Ponder Street between Panhandle and the north and of the bridge half way between Panhandle and Broadway. The two residents affected at 1204 and 1122 Panhandle are both in favor of 'no parking'. The reason for stopping at the creek is that es you cross the creek going north, the street widens again providing enough room for 2-way lurking. STAFF RECOMMENDED: Staff recommendod 'NO Packing' on both aides of Ponder Street from its intersection with Panhandle to a point just after the bridge over creek midway between Panhandle and Broadway. COMMISSIONERS: Doug Chadwick made a motion to accept staff recommendation. Alice Gore seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. t $jF L r f 1 t MEKORANDFJM DATE: April 25, 1990 TO: Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission FROM: Paul Iwuchukwu, CTSSC Liaison SUBJECT: Traffic Safety Agenda for April 301 1990 ITEM 12 NO PARKING ON PONDER STREET= Going north on Ponder Street, the street narrows somewhat from Egan Drive up to a point just past the bridge over the creek midway between Panhandle Street and Broadway Street. Currentlyo parking 1A allowed on either side of this section of Ponder. When this happens it creates a problem for two-way traffic. Ponder is a (school) bus route and also a SPAN trolley route and this section presents a 1 problem when there are parked vehicles even on one sides Mre Jim Curry who lives on the northeast corner lot at the intersection of Ponder and Panhandle has requested no parking on Ponder from Panhandle to the creek from 6:00 a.ma to 4:00 p.m. Staff has sought to include the entire narrow section in this request but not all the owners have been cooperativee The owner of the apartment building on 715 Ponder said he has no off-street parking for some of his tenants so they have to park on he street. The owners of the three properties on the east aide (700 Block) of Ponder are not all in favor of no parking. Two have been contacted and one is in favor and the other is opposed. Staff is recommending No Parking on both sides of Ponder Street from its intersection with Panhandle to a point just after the bridge over creek midway betvsen Panhandle and eroadwaye Staff recommends approvals i t ~r d Yr 29521; , r ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF VEHICLES ON BOTH SIDES OF PONDER STREET FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH PANHANDLE STREET TO A POINT 200 FEET NORTH OF SAID INTER- SECTION; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT rrkti.' TO EXCEED TWO HUNDYED DOLLARS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CIIY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I, When siqns are erected giving notice thereof, no person shall park a vehicle from 8:00 a.m, to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday upon the following street or portion thereof, in the City of Denton, to-wit: Both sides of Ponder Street from its intersection with Panhandle Street to a point 200 feet north of said intersection. SECTION 11. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or applica- tion thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by 'A ny court of competent jurisdic~ton, such holding shall not affecL• the validity of the remainir,a portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the City cif Denton, Texas, hereby de- clares it would have enacted such regaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION 211. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance`, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued E thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a r fine not exceeding Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00). Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be punished within the limits above. SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordi- nance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. s s i i :F l ; 1 PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1990. i s BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR + 1 ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCHj CITY ATTORNEY R BY: a 1 `,l 3 ffff 1 1 i , F ~ 1 ISM kM,k' ~ i1~ t" ~ Ik 1 o- ~ I J ~RGM►PWAy z N 1202 ~ ui.i Panhandle oil, I d Panhandle n t j P~•r-IF4AND~~ 720 Ponder k 71& Ponder 1132 Egan EGA" A, ` I ~ ! i t4O PARK.ING oN PoNDER STat%T ~ 1 fW~ y `I r I IF' I. I CITY LILL COUNCIL .2 ,f i ~~pOfl00 o t 0~ ~ a ar o + o i DATEr 08/07/90 f'Nr r, CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 6//~ Y • V TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council PROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: SIGN PERMIT FEES RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the sign fee ordinance. SUMMARY: The ordinance add: a fee for permitting off-premise signs on IH35, 1 and Highways 377 and 380. Signs here are now permttted by the State Department Of Highways and Public Transportation (SDHPT), Certification of the City of Denton to permit these signs by SDHPT it: expected shortly. With that certification, all signs in Denton will be permitted by Denton and fall under the enforcement authority of Denton. Tha fee to based on the estimated cost to permit these signs. The methodology used to calculate that cost is Att,.ehment 1. Others' { fees are Attachment 2. The attached ordinance repeals the previous sign fee ordinance (section III), adds a section for off-premise signs on IH 35, 380, and 377 (section I(a)), and leaves the existing sign fees unchanged i (section I(b) and ii). BACKGROUND- + 1 f 1 %.,ril 3, 1990: Ordinance 90-051 passed. Enabled Denton to become a SDHPT certified city for sign permitting, PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: k?r Sign administration program: Planning and Development and Code Enforcement: Sign owners and contractors on IH 35 and Highways 377 and 380, FISCAL IMPACT: An additional $14,000 in revenue In the first year and $5,000 , thereafter, annually to offset the administrative cost, i Res ully_ ~ubm eds Prep b : Llo V, Harrell City Manager Frank H, Ro b ne, AICP Executive Director Planning and Development 2325x ! 1 1 I I i s - r. ; } SIGN FEE PROPOSAL ATTACHMENT 1 r Off-Premise Siiglis on 380, 377, and I-35: Initial Year- Working Hours (in dollars) * z $112.61 Material Cost (average) for file making - $ 5.00 Sign Application Costs = $ 1.23 3 City Vehicle Costs for inspections (average) = $ 9,54 Identification Stencils for sign structures - $ 10.00 TOTAL = $138.38 *3ased on five city employee hours of work for one permit. Estimated permits for the initial year = 45 Estimated revenue for 100 permits at $140.OU each - $14,OU0 i Off-Prernise Signs on 380, 371, and 1-35: After Initial Year- Working Hours (in dollars) * $27.52 I1atc-ial Cost for file making - O,UO a Sign Application Costs = 1,23 i 3 City Vehicle Costs for sign inspections (average) _ $ 9,54 t~ Identification Stencils for sign structures • $10,00 TOTAL • $48,29 *8ased on five city employee hours of work for one permit. Estimated permits after the initial year a 100 Estimated revenue for 100 permits at $50 each $5,000 Transfer of State issued permits - $25.00 (NOTE: $25,UO is equal to the State's current fee.) i 1 r ~r r+ i CITY REQUIREMENTS FOR ATTACHMENT 2 T5E bIG1iT i The following is a list of certified cities, within District 18, and their requirements for off-premise signs along the primary federally-funded thoroughfares: i Corinth - ( There is no fee because there is currently only two signs i inside the city limits and no further signs are allowed. Dallas - Fee is based on square footage of sign. Maximum amount is $350.00. This is a one time fee. Annual renewals are not 1 required. DeSoto - Fee is $1.00 per square foot plus $50.UD. This is a one time fee. Annual renewals are not required. Duncanville - Fee is based on new construction of billboards only. The city allows new signs to be 50 feet tall with 200 square feet. The fee for a permit is ;25.00. Annual renewals are not required. Existing signs are not required to repermit. Farmers Branch - t No off-premise billboards allowed inside city limits. I Grand Prairie - $50.00 for signs 50 square feet or less. 550.00 plus 100 for each square foot over 50 square feet. 115.C0 for illumination $60.00 for annual renewal Hig`~land Park - The city does not have billboards and does not allow off-premise billboards inside the city limits. 2212x-------------------------------------------------------------- I h 2-1 f . f r Ole- 1 t ~ Certified City Listings rApril 11, 1990 Page 2 of 4 Irving - $200.00 for initial installation of billboards. 100.00 for every refacing done to the billboard. 5100.00 for subdivision signs along major thoroughfares, for a maximum of one per premise. m Mesquite The city currently has ten off-premise billboards inside the 1 city limits. When the City Council passed an ordinance prohibiting further billboards, it also required a one time permit fee of $100.00. Annual renewals are not required. Plano - I $60.00 for a permit. This is o one time fee. The city is currently researching and gathering data to change their fee schedule to an annual charge. Richardson - $50.00 one time permit fee. University Park - Fee is based on the cost of the construction of the sign. This is a one time fee. Annual renewals are not required. Value Permit fee $ 0 - $500 20.00 1 501 11 000 - 2,500 140.00 1 2,501 - $5,000 $50.00 { 5,f00 or more 1% o value itestlake ~ i The city currently does not have any billboards and are ~ prohibited, by ordinance, to allow new signs into the city Mits. 2212x/'l 2-2 i ,I cy■L bt9cai:~ ( ~a I V Certified City Listings April 17, 1990 Page 3 of 4 No cities in Ellis, Kaufman, Navarro, and Rockwall counties, in District 18, are certified. Balch Springs, Fairview, and Hickory Creek will not issue advertising sign permits within the city limits. Arlington There is a-$550.00 fee for the initial installation with no further renewal rates annually. Houston - No new billuoards are allowed inside the city limits. To maintain existing sign., sign owners must obtain a 00perating Permit" every three years. The cost for the operating permit is based on the square footage of each sign face that the individual will control. The fee is $90.00 for the first 200 square feet and 40[ for each square foot over the 200. In repair, reconstruction, or renovation of an existing sign, the fees are as follows: F $25.00 - plan inspection $59.00 - site inspection $25.00 - electrical permit I $ 5.00 - preparation fee $45.00 - reconstruction fee for the first 50 square feet 1 and 33t for each additional square foot. if any C reconstruction, repair, or renovation is done without a i permit, the construction cost will be doubled. If the cost of the reconstruction, repair, or renovation } 1 of a non-conforming sign exceeds 60% of the cost of a new sign, the sign must be removed. j StaPublicaTransportationways and 1 The State DeFartment requires all signs owners to obtain an Outdoor Advertising License. To obtain the license, the Ir applicant must submit an Outdoor Advertising License Application, an Uutdoor Advertisers Bond alongg with a Power of Attorney, non,-efundable fee of 125.00. The amount and a of the bond required is $2,500 for each county in which signs are to be erected or maintained up to a maximum of. $10,000.00 for four or core counties. 2212x/8 2-3 l Certified City Listings April 17 , 1990 ~I Page 4 of 4 ` ine nonrefundable permit fee is oared on the size of the sign as follows; (1) $100.00 for a sign no larger than 100 square feet; (2) $175.00 for a sign larger than 100 square feet, but not larger than 300 square feet; or (3) $250.00 for a sign larger than 300 square feet. A permit is valid for one year for the location indicated on the on inal permit provided that if the sign is not legally maintained, ` or if the State acquires the sign for which the permit vas f issued, or if the sign removed for any reason, or if the Outdoor Advertising License held by the permittee is revoked, the permit automatically terminates. A sign permit may be renewed before the existing permit terminates by the permit holder filing a Permit Renewal Application for Outdoor Advertising Sign to renew the permit with the Department and submitting a nonrefundable fee, for each year the permit is being renewed.-The renewal fee will be one-half the amount of the original sign permit fee for the size of the sign. A permit may not be renewed for more than five years in advance. If in the event a sig9n is sold and the permit is transferred, there wi11 be a $25.00 nonrefundable transfer fee. The transfer fee must accompany the Outdoor Advertising Application except that no transfer application will require a fee of more than $2,500.OD per State j Department District. i { i ~ s i I i i 2-4 2212x/9 i +I ~LWr r` f i 7 k t q ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING THE FEES FOR SIGN PERMITS TO PROVIDE FOR AN ANNUAL FEE FOR SIGNS REQUIRED BY THE STATE TO BE PERMITTED; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: voj SECTION I. That the permit fees for signs provided for in article 17 of Appendix B - Zoning of the Code of Ordinances shall be as follows: (a) Off-Premise signs fronting upon highways 380 and 377 and Interstate Highway 35, 35E, and 35W shall be as follows: $140.00 for the first city permit. $ 50.00 for each subsequent permit. (b) All other sign permits shall be as follows: Effective Area (in square feet) fgg 0-60 $20.00 } over 60 to 120 25.00 over 120 to 250 55.00 i SECTION Ii. That there shall be a $10.00 fee for a license for persons erecting signs for compensation as required by article 17 of Appendix B - Zoning of the Code of Ordinances. SECTION III, That Ordinance No. 89-033 is repealed. SEWON IV. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1990. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR _ i i t 11 I I ~aw I RY"N'~ V ' I ATT ST JUNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY I` { BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCHr CITY ATTORNEY I r 1 BY, i Signii fee E a { I ` i ;i . iF. I i i i ~l i d 4 CITY COUNCIL i j r 4 i e pi t°N t~4ooo`, ~ ~~OQGCGG~O~ ILJJITJ i i' mom! / { r _ J i r i P ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING THE 1990 TAX ROLLS AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSt SECTION i. That the City Council hereby approves the 1990 Tax Rolls of the City of Denton, Texas in the amount of $1097009351351 assessed valuation, based on the Cortified Appraisal Roll as approved by the Appraisal Review Board of the Denton Central Appraisal District. SECTION, That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the ` day of 1990. ~ BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST! k h , JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECFETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY 1 f BY., I V I r ~ ~ 74 owl I IT CITY COUNCIL Fill Ill Illsall I IF 11 11 Fill FFIIIIIIFI III r , I j i i o ~ 4 a r c x t• p0~ i oooac' ~oo~ T.T .1 1 111 j i i MILT V 1 T -imam I t~ 9 ~ r ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING A COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT ?EL£ASE AND DISMISSAL OF ALL PENDING AND FUTURE CLAIMS FOR PENDING LITIGATION BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND LARY MORRIS, ET AL; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. i THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: E SECTION I. That the attached Compromise Settlement Release and Dismissal •4ith Prejudice of all Pending and Future Claims between the City of Denton and Lary Morris, Brenda Morris, Individually and as Next Friend of Michael Morris, providing for the settlement and compromise of the litigation now pending between the parties before the 158th Judicial District Court of Denton County, Texas in Cause No. 90-20209-158, is approved in accordance with its terms. The City Manager is authorized to execute the agreement and all other documents and make the payments and take such action as is necessary to comply with the terms of said agreement. i SECTION II. Thar this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of August, 1990. f 1 BOB CASTLEBERRY$ MAYOR i ATTEST: I JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY I C f BY. I APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: i ! DEBRA ADANI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY 1 BY: 1 P17~ i ~oi 1111111 1 NC'M 1 d Y 1 P NO. 90-20209-158 LARY MORRIS, et al, Plaintiffs § IN THE DISTRICT COURT I V § 158TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT I CITY OF DENTON, Defendant § D£NTON COUNTY, TEXAS I I S u~ ..+..vtcc RF.TTT.F.M£NT ~T.a,QR AND DISMISSAL AIIIRVl11VV ~~a~.i~ PREkJD3CE_gF ALL PENDING AND Fi;TUREII'Lg WITH r THIS AGREEMENT is by and between Plaintiffs, Lary Morris and Brenda Morris, individually and Brenda Morris as Next Friend for I Plaintiff Michael Morris, collectively referred to as "Plaintiffs", j and the City of Denton, Texas, hereinafter referred to as "City": WHEREAS, on July 4, 1989 Plaintiffs were involved in an 1 accident while traveling northbound in their truck on Foxcroft Street in Denton, Texas when the road surface collapsed beneath them; and WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have filed the above-captioned lawsuit seeking unliquidated damages for personal injuries arising therefrom; and WHEREAS, Plaintiffs claimed as cause of action in the above captioned lawsuit the negligence of the City of Denton; and WHEREAS, bona fide disputes and controversies exist between the parties both as to liability and the amount thexeof, if any, and by reason of such disputes and controversies the parties hereto desire to compromise and settle all claims and causes of actions of any kind whatsoever which Plaintiffs have or may have in the future arising out of such occurrence and intend that the full terms and conditions of the compromise and settlement be set forth in this compromise settlement agreement; } NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the recitals set forth above and the sum of Twenty-one Thousand Dollars y ($21,000.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby sLE acknowledged, Plaintiffs have this day released and by these presents do release, acquit, and forever discharge the City of i Denton, Texas, its officers, elected officials, attorneys, agents, servants, and employees, and all persons, natural or corporate, in privity with them or any of them, from any and all claims, suits, actions, demands or causes of action of any kind whatsoever, at common law, statutory or otherwise, which Plaintiffs have or might have, known or unknown, now existing or that might arise hereafter, i directly or indirectly attributable to the above described i occurrence, it being intended to releaso all claims of any kind { which Plaintiffs might have against those hereby released whether 1 ~ asserted in the above-captioned suit or not. l It is expressly underrstood and agreed that the terms hereof # are contractual and not merely recitals and that the agreements herein contained and the consideration transferred is to compromise doubtful and disputed claims, avoid litigation, ant bitiy peace, and that no payments made nor releases or consideration given shall be construed as an admission of liability, all liability being { expressly denied. In further release of the receipt of funds as above described, ` the undersigned do hereby -igree to indemnify and hold harmless the PAGE 2 i i I i~ r' City of Denton, Texas and any otbc-r person, firm, or corporation bound to defend or pay judgments against it, from and against any ° r and all claims, demands, or causes of action, including claims for contribution or indemnity, medical expenses, and the reasonable necessary coats, including attorneys' Pees, incurred in defense of ! any such claim, which any other claimant has or may have arising out of or resulting from the accident on July 4, 1989, as above i described. k It is further understood and agreed that the Plaintiffs will present to the Court above designated an Agreed order in the form attached hereto, dismissing such cause in all respects and with 1 prejudice to the rights of Plaintiffs to refile same or any part thereof, and that all costs o; suit are to be taxed against the parties incurring same. Plaintiffs Lary Morris and Brenda Morris, individually and III Brenda Morris as Next Friend of Plaintiff Michael Morris, warrant that they have each read this Agreement and fully understand it to be a compromise and settlement and release of claims, known or unknown, present or future, that they have or may have against the party or parties released, arising out of the matters described. Plaintiffs Lary Morris and Brenda Morris, individually and Brenda Morris as Next Friend of Plaintiff Michael Morris, warrant that they are of legal age and legally competent to execute this Agreement, and they do so of their own free will and accord after consulting with and acting upon the advice of their attorney, and without reliance on any representation of any kind or character PAGE 3 r 1 not expressly set forth herein. Brenda Morris further warrants that she is the natural mother of Michael vorrl.s, and is acting on behalf of and as Next Friend for Michael Morris, and further represents and is of the opinion that the proposed settlement is to the advantage of Michael Morris and is in his best interest. Brenda Morris, Next Friend of Michael Morris, a minor, promises to obtain court approval of this Compromise and Settlement Agreement. [sry Morris, Plaintiff Brenda Morris, Individually and as Next Friend of Michael Morris i APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY: BY: i CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS a i ' k r, d PAGE 4 11 n... .,rl.w In •JJJJtw..,MSj.~~ t t F r~:,. r• THE STATE OF TEXAS § f COUNTY OF DENTON ; r BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, on this clay personally appeared Lary Morris, known to me to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed; that he executed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed after having it fully explained to him, and after having read it fully, and after realizing the effect thereof to be a full and final release and discharge of the City of Denton, Texas for any matter or thing dealt with in the foregoing instrument; and that the same was executed by him without any threat, force, fraud, duress, or representation of any kind by any person whomsoever; 'and that the said Lary Morris at the time of execution of the relaase was completely sober, sane, and capable of understanding the character of his acts and deeds and was in complete charge of all of his faculties and capable of executing I this inatrument and of understanding the significance of his acts, 1 GIVEN under my hand and seal of office this day of August, 1990. r j Notary Public, State of Texas 1 r PAGE 5 4 f t THE STATE OF TEXAS S COUNTY OF DENTON S BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, on this day personally appeared Brenda Morris, known to me to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed; that she executed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed after having it fully explained to her, and after having read it fully, and after realizing the effect thereof to be a full and final release and discharge of the City of Denton, Texas for any matter or thing dealt with in the foregoing instruments and that the same was exerated by her without any threat, force, fraud, duress, or representation of any kind by any person whomsoever; and that the said Brerla Morris at the tilde of execution of the release was completely saber, sane, and capable of understanding the character of her acts and deeds and was in complete charge of all of her faculties and capable of executing this instrument and of understanding the significance of her acts. GIVEN under my hand and seal of office this day of August, 1990. i i i Notary PuLtic, State of Texas j I I E i PAGE 6 I ~ NMI S THE STATE OF TEXAS § S COUNTY OF DENTON § BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, on this day personally appeared Brenda Morris as Next Friend for Michael Morris, known to me to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressedt that she executed the same on behalf of her natural chilu Michael Morris as her free and voluntary act and deed after having it fully explained to her, and after having read it fully, and after realizing the effect thereof to be a full and final release and discharge of the City of Denton, Texas for any matter or thing dealt with in the foregoing instruments and that the same was executed by her without any threat, force, fraud, duress, or representation of any kind by any person whomsoevert and that the said Brenda Morris as Next Friend for Michael Morris at the time of execution of the release was completely sober, sane, and capable of understanding the character of her acts and deeds and was in complete charge of all of her faculties and capable of executing I~ this instrument and of understanding the significance of her acts. GIVEN under my hand and seal of office this - day of August, 1990. Notary Public, State of Texas 1 i PAGE 7 1 1 NO. 90-20209-158 i LARY MORRIS, at al, Plaintiffs S IN THE DISTRICT COURT V. 9 158TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CITY OF DENTON, Defendant § DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS I r AGREED ORDER OF DISMrgsir On this day came to be heard the Motion of Lary Morrie, at all Plaintiffs in the above-entitled and numbered cause, seeking dismissal of said cause with prejudice. The Court is of the s opinion and finds that all matters and dispute between the parties have been fully and finally compromised and settled. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that the above-entitled and numbered cause be and the same is dismissed with a prejudice to the right of Plaintiffs to refile same or any part thereof. All costs of court are taxed against the party incurring ~ same. SIGNED this day of August, 1990. i Honorable Philip Vick ~I Judge, 158th District Court 1 Denton County, Texas APPROVED: r Gregory J. Sawko Attorney for Plaintiffs State Bar No. 17692700 _ J Jerry E. Drake, Jr. Attorney for Defendant State Bar No. 06107500 i 1 j ; i (.aa • r, 1 f NO, 90-20209-158 LARY MORRIS, BRENDA MORRIS § IN THE DISTRICT COURT INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT § FRIEND OF MICHAEL MORRIS, § VS. § § 158TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT S CITY OF DENTON TRXAS § § DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS Q$DEgAPPROVINQ NEXT FRIrun DESIGN TTQN On this ,_day of August 1990, this Court having heard the application of Brenda Morris to act as Next Friend for minor son Michael Morris, the Court having the opinion that The Court having heard the evidence in support of Plaintiff, Brenda Morris' application to be appointed Next Friend of minor Michael Morris approves the Plaintiff Brenda Morris' application pursuant to Texas i Rule of Procedure 440 and waives the bond for costs set forth therein. IT I3, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Brenda Morris J act as Next Friend of minor, Michael Morris. I IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Brenda Morris serve with no requirement of a bond for costs. SIGNED this day of August 1990. r i 1 JUDGE PRESIDING APPROVED AS TO FO ONLY: -AL Gr or"J, 0 Attorney for Plaintiffs Jerry Drake Attorney for Defendant .1 l ~YM.'P /Ida~~ j I Y Oro N0. 90-20109-158 LARY MCdRIE, BRENDA MORRIS § IN THE DISTRICT COURT INDIV7.f JAW ! A140 AS NEXT § FRIEND OF' MICHAEL MORRIS, § VS. § 158TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT § § CITY OF DF,NTON TEXAS § DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS ORDER APPROVING NEXT FRIEND D£SICU= On this ,day of August 1990, this Court having heard the application of arenda Morris to act as Next Friend for minor son Michael Morrie, the Court having the opinion tl-.at: { The Court having heard the evidence in s+.j;+por.t of Plaintiff, Brenda Morrie' application to be appointed Next Friend of mirror Michael Morris i approves the Plaintiff Brenda Morrie' application pursuant to Texas Rule of Procedure 44, and waives the bond for costs set forth therein, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Brenda Morris act as Next Friend of minor, Michael Morria. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Brenda Morris serve with no requirement of a bond for costs. SIGNED this day of August 1990. j i JUDGE PRESIDING j APPROVED AS TO FO M ONLY Gr ory J, awko Attorney for Plaintiffs Jerry Drake Attorney for Defendant j If I y t 9 J l NO. 90-20209-158 LARY MORRIS, BRENDA MORRIS § IN THE DISTRICT COURT INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT 5 FRIEND OF MICHAEL MORRIS, § VS. § 158TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT S CITY OF DENTON TEXAS § S DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS ORDER 11PPR0~'IN(` t~r4 - -Rt .NDyIGNATION sa - On this _day of August 1990, this Court having heard the application of Brenda Morris to act as Next Friend for minor son Michael Morrie, the Court havi;Ig ,:he opinion that: The Court having heard the evidance in support of Plaintiff, Brenda Morrie, application to be appointed Next Friend of minor Michael Morris approves the Plaintiff ?rends Morris' application puruuant to Texas Rule of Procedure 441 and waives the bond for costs set forth therein. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Brenda Morris act as Next Friend of minor, Michael Morrie. IT IS FUAT.'E:i ORDERED that Brenda Morris serve with no requirement of a bond for costa. I SIGNED this day of August 1990. t i j DODGE PRESIDING APPROVED AS TO FO ONLY: Gr cry J. awko Attorney for Plaintiffs t Jerry Drake Attorney for Defendant i V W N0. 90-20209-158 LARY MORRIS, BRENDA MORRIS § IN THE DISTRICT COURT INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT § FRIEND OF MICHAEL MORRIS, § VS. 158TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT § § § § CITY OF D1:NTON TEXAS DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS S ORDER APPROVING NEXT FRIEND _p TGNATION On this day of August 1990, this Court having heard the application of Brenda Morris to act as Next Friend for minor son Michael Morris, the Court having the opinion thats The Court having heard the evidence in support of Plaintiff, Brenda Morris, application to be appointed Next Friend of minor Michael Morris approves the Plaintiff Brenda Morris, application pursuant to Texas i Rule of Procedure 44, and waives the bond for costs set forth therein. I IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Brenda Morris ` act as Next Friend of minor, Michael Morris. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Brenda Morris serve with no requirement f of a bond for costs. SIGNED this day of August 1990. I JUDGE PRESIDING 1 J APPROVED AS TO FO M ONLY: I Gr ory J. awko Attorney for Plaintiffs Jerry Drake Attorney for Defendant IWO wlk~ I I I lv p}a p T.N.. INN r CITY COUNCIL i t I y I~r r ~ i 00 c • V a ~ O~~ 1 o N t ~ oo~~ ~v~pLOuLC~~' . -7 TT t Y r ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING A COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT RELEASE AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ALL PENDING AND FUTURE CLAIMS FOR PENDING LITIGATION BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND L4URA RICHARDSON, ET ALl W DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ` TKE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION S. That the attached Compromise Settlement Release and Dismissal with Prejudice of all Pending and Future Claims between tho City of Denton and Laura Mae Richardson (Estate of Larry Champion), providing for the settlement and compromise of the litigation now pending between the parties before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division in Civil Action No. C-90-78-CA, is approved in accordance with its terms. The City Manager is authorized to execute the agreement and all other documents and make the payments and take such action as is necessary to comply with the terms of said agreement. $,=ION 11. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of August, 1990. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY f BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY I ~ A'11 A BY., i 4 i I ~Y P' ■ 1 R■■ a/ r ~ N 1 , 1 { 1 UYTTED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION LAURA MAE RICHARDSON, a INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS i REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF* LARRY D. CHAMPION and CYNTHIA n LUSTER AS NEXT FRIEND OF WILLIAM LUSTER, A MINOR CHILD * CIVIL ACTION NO. S-90-76-CA VS. i THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS and + CRAIG FITZGEARLD • STIPULATION FOR JUDGM M r KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: E That it is agreed by and between Plaintiffs, LAURA MM I RICHARDSON, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF i LARRY D. CHAMPION and CYNTHIA LUSTER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT i FRIEND OF WILLIAM LUSTER and WILLIAM WSTER, ACTING HEREIN BY ' AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEN, duly appointed by the Court ~ 11 + 1 and Defendants, THE CITY OF DENTON# TEXAS, and CRAIG FITZGEARLD, individually and in his official' capacity as a member of the Police Department of the City of Denton, as follows: } 1. Defendants will pay to Plaintiffs the total aggretate E I ~ sur: of Eighty-two Thousand Five Hundred and NO1100 Dollars I (41 2,500.00), said sum of Eighty-two Thousand Five Hundred and J N01100 Dollars ($62,500.00) to be apportioned to the respective parties as the Court deems just and fair. 2. For and in consideration of said payment, LAURA MAE e j .'rCHARDSON, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF a f STIPULATION FOR 3UDGMENT...PAGE 1 I i • I~ I Warm 7 f 1 LNRRY D. CHAMPION and CYNTHIA LUSTER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT r f FRIEND OF WILLIAM LUSTER and WILLIAM LUSTER, ACTING HEr.EIN BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, have agreed and do agree to and with the Defendants, that the sum so paid shall be in full and final satisfaction and compromise of all actions, causes of action, claims (including subrogation claims), and demands, on account of or in any way growing out of any and all personal injuries, death, intentional misconduct, violation of j constitutional and statutory rights, breach of any duty of good faith and fair dealing, damage to reputation, pain and suffering, grief, bereavement, lose of consortium and companionship, mental anguish, loss of earning capacity, loss of wages, profits and money, damage to and taking of property, and 1 all other damages whether known or unknown and whether heretofore asserted or not, owned or possessed by any of said Plaintiffs against Craig Fitzgearld, his family, relatives, insurers, and attorneys, or against the City of Denton, its officers, elected officials, employees, agents, insurers, and attorneys, growing out of or in any way connected with the death + of Larry D. Champion or the inveatigation of said death which 1 occurred on or about November 4, 19890 all as more fully described in PlaintiffsO pleadings on file heroin, to which reference is made for more complete description. Plaintiffs do hereby agree to indemnify and save harmless the said Craig Fitzgearld and the City of Denton of and from all further claims, demands, costs, or ex0enses arising out of the injuries j STIPULATION FOR JUDGHENT...PAGE 2 i 1 1 per. and damages sustained by them as a result of said death of Larry D. Champion and the investigation of said death, whether included in a claim for damages under the wrongful Death or Survival Statutes (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Cede 01.001 etc.) or under some other statute or common law. 3. The undersigned Plaintiffs understand and agree that the amount paid under this Stipulation for Judgment is in full y satisfaction for all damages arising on account of the above described incident and that they will receive no further sums of money therefrom. The undersigned Plaintiffs agree not to assert or prosecute any further claims or lawsuits therefore against anyone whomsoever, whether or not herein or otherwise named, described or identified. Any and all claims against parties not specifically released herein, if any, are hereby assigned in full to the parties hereby released. t ~ t 4. It is expressly understood and agreed that Laura Mae R!,chardson has already paid, or will pay out of the aforementioned sum, all medical, doctors', and hospital charges t received in the past or to be incurred in the future by Larry D. champion and will defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the said Defendants and their insurers of and from any claims for such c f charges, especially with reference to any liens under the Texas Hospital Lian Law. 5. The undersigned Plaintiffs, for the consideration A hereinabove expressed, represent and agree that this Stipulation for Judgment is in compromise of and is a full accord and i I t STIPULATION FOR Jl1DGFENT...PAGE 3 j ~ I ti r , i i c ~ 1 4 ~ i t satisfaction of, a disputed claim. Plaintiffs represent and warrant that William Luster is the only child of Larry D. Champion and that William Luster is the only heir of the deceased, Larry D. Champion. 6. This Stipulation for Judgment is hereby respectfully +ar submitted to the Court by all parties including said Guardian ad litem who is of the opinion, and represents to the Court, that the proposed settlement is to the advantage of said minor and is for his best interest and said parties do further request approval of the Stipulation for Judgment by this Court. 7. Plaintiffs hereby represent to Defendants and to the Court that no promises, representations or agreements not set out herein have been made to theme that this Stipulation for i Judgr,r"t is executed without reliance upon any stato.ent or representation of any person or parties released or theLft representatives, concerning the nature and extent of th1 injuries, damages and/or legal liability therefore, but that k this Stipulation for Judgment is made of their own free will and f r accord after consulting with and acting upon the advice of their Ey attorneys. ?f ' THE PROVISIONS OF THIS STIPULATION FOR JUDGMENT ARE CONTRACTUAL AND NOT MERE RECITALS. i a STIPULATION FOR JUDGMENT... PAGE 4 i i i C WITNESS our hands this day of 1990. i s a Laura Mae Richardson Cynthia Luster t i i Guardian Ad Litem APPROVED AND AGREED TO: 1 I 1 rom A. Boardman, Ronald H. Clark, Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorney for Defendant, City of Denton E E ' Ron Johnson, { Attorney for Defendant, I Craig Fitzqearld 1 THE STATE OF TEXAS } } COUNTY OF DENTON This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 1990, by Laura Mae Richardson. Notary Public-State of Texas THE STATE OF TEXAS ) ) COUNTY OF DENTON ) II' I This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day i of 1990, by Cynthia Luster. I a Notary Public-State of Texas i i STIPULATION FOR JUDGMENT... PAGE 5 Owl THE STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF DENTON ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on the of 19900 by day Litem on behalf of William Luster. as Guardian Ad Notary Public-State of Texas i _ I { I k i r ! 1 I I STIPULATION FOR JUDGMENT... PAGE 6 r (41 r P UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION E LAURA MAE RICHARDSON, i INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF* LARRY D. CHAMPION and CYNTHIA LUSTER AS'NEXT FRIEND OF WILLIAM LUSTER, A MINOR CHILD * CIVIL ACTION NO. S-90-75-CA VS. a * THE CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS and CRAIG FITZGEARLD BEL= i KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: III v 1 That I, the undersigned, LAURA MAE RICHARDSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF LARRY D. CHAMPION, for and in consideration of the sum of fS ) I i cas.1,to me in hand paid, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged I I I and confessed, do hereby for myself, my hairs, representatives and assigns, forever release, discharge, and acquit TEE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, its officers, elected officials, employees, agents, insurers, ant attorneys, and CRAIG FITZGEARLD, his i family, relatives, insurers, and attorneys, of and from any and all claims, suits, actions, causes of action, demands, damages, costs, expapses, and compensation growing out of, or arising from, the death of Larry D. Champion or the investigation of C.~ said death which occurred on or about November 4, 1999, or from any other event which occurred prior to the date of this REL ME.,,PAGE 1 Y' release, and I do further in consideration of such payment f release, discharge, and acquit the city of Denton, Texas, its e officers, elected officials, employees, agents, insurers, and f f attorneys, and Craig Fitzgearld, his family, relatives, f insurers, and attorneys, of and from any and all claims under the Judgment heretofore rendered in this cause; and I do here and now declare such Judgment, as to the recovery awarded to me, to have been fully paid, discharged, and satisfied. WITNESS MY HAND this day of r 1990. t Laura Mae Richardson, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Larry D. Champion APPROVED; Tom A. Boardman ! Attorney for Plaintiffs t a THE STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF DENTON ) ! This instrument was acknowledged before me on the of day 1990, by Laura Mae Richardson, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Larry D. champion. Notary Public - State of Texas RELEA~,SE, . , PA E 2 i 3 s . Y , v UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION LAURA MAE RICHARDSON, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF* LARRY D. CHAMPION and CYNTHIA LUSTER AS NEXT FRIEND OF WILLIAM LUSTER, A MINOR CHILD * CIVIL ACTION NO. S-90-76-CA + 4 VS. * THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS and CRAIG FITZGEARLD BEI+~&E 1 i KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: i That I, the undersigned, CYNTHIA LUSTER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR WILLIAM LUSTER, for and in consideration of i the sum of cash to me in hand paid, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged and confessed, do hereby for myself, my heirs, representatives and assigns, forever release, discharge, { and acquit THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, its officers, elected { officials, employees, agents, insurers, and attorneys, and CRAIG FITZGEARLD, his family relatives, insurers, and attorneys, of and from any and all Maims, suits, actions, causes of action, I demands, damages, costs, expenses, and compensation growing out f of, or ari4ing from, the death of Larry D. Champion or the investigation of said death which occurred on or about November 4, 1989, or from any other event which occurred prior to the date of this releasst.and I do further in consideration i I RELEASE PACE j r 1 of such payment release, discharge, and acquit the City of E Denton, Texas, its officers, elected officials, employees, agents, insurers, and attorneys, and Craig Fitzgearld, his family, relatives, insurers, and attorneys, of and from any and all claims under the Judgment heretofore rendered in this cause; and I do here and now declare such .judgment, as to the recovery awarded to sae, to have been fully paid, discharged, and satisfied. WITNESS MY HAND this _ day of , 1990. Cynthia Luster, Individually and as Next Friend of William Luster APPROVED: i I Tom A. Boardman Attorney for Plaintiffs E THE STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF DENTON ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day +I of , 19901 by Cynthia Luster, Individually and 1 as Next Friend of William Luster. Notary Public - State of Texas ~I l RELEASE... PAGE 2 1 i CITY COUNCIL a 4 f ~or o~ lv0 ~ 1 I • I ~oC CS~+O~ 11 ~Tl Ile- -NNW i f Y August 07, 1990 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM T0: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF TH% CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager a Rd: CONSIDER ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT PROVIDING FOR THE PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY FROM LILLIAN IRENE QUESENBERRY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of July 23, 1990, recommended to the City Council approval of subject Ordinance/Contract to purchase a 1.75 acre tract with house from Ms. Irene Quesenberry in the amount of $35,000 and recommended the source of funds be the 1990 CIP, 2lectrlc Department Project ►90-EMIS-04. SUMMARY: Ms. Quesenberry initially contacted the City to see if there was any desire to acquire her tract. After review, it was determined that this tract could be combined with the City's current property to create a moro efficient layout of the Service Center complex. BACKGROUND: As illustrated on the attached map, the Quesenberry tract is I located at the northeast corner of the City's Service center 111 i tract. Ruddell Street separates the two tracts at this time. In the future, Ruddell Street could be extended due north to link up with the Ruddell Street north of Mingo Road) the parking and storage areas are to be reconfigured which will allow for a better overall layout of the Service Center facilities. The Electric Department will property to warehouse transformers andother aelectric materials. Also attached is a copy of the evaluation sheet from the Denton Central Appraisal District for the Quesenberry tract. The current value has been set at $46,327 by this entity. i~ peas r 4 Page 2 Quensenberry Property 1 ~ r i The Electric Department's Capital Improvements Plan for 1990 included item 490-EMIS-04, $488,000 for Service Center/ Dispatch Facility Building. The Staff is recommending that this CIP item be used as source of funds and, if use of .mss property is by departments other than the Electric Department, a rental fee will be recommended in a manner similar to the arrangement on the Service Center. i PROGRAMS, GROUPS OR DEPARTMENTi AFFECTED: Denton Municipal Utilities, Legal Department, City Council, Public Utilities Board, property owner. FISCAL IMPACT: $35,000 to be paid from Utility Department Funds, CIP prrject 90-EMIS-04. Respec ly subm t ed, { i ~ i Lloyd Harrell, Cit"y Manager P ared by: N Ro er lkfqan, Right-or-Way Agent ~ Ap ove y A. E. Nelson, xecutive Director Department of Utilities Exhibit I Ordinance II Contract for. Purchase of Real Property III Property Evaluation Sheet IV 1990 Electric Department CIP Sheet V Project Location VI PUB Minutes of July 23, 1990 CCAGEN.807 i yg1 e i w T 3 1 r j I f E 1 j ORDINANCE NO. j AN REAL N ORDINANCE PROPERTY FROM L APPROVING A CONTRACT PROVIDING OVIDING FOR AN FORANDP TRHE PURCHASE OF LLIAN IRENE QUESENBERRYf EFFECTIVE DATE, III THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: ACTION 2. That the City Counci Texas 1 of the City of Denton, ~ J approves the contract providing for the purchase of the real property described in the contract attached hereto, between the t City of Denton and Lillian Irene Quesenberry. SECTION II. That the City Council authorizes the Mayor and 3 city Manager to execute any and all documents necessary to consummate the purchase of real property in accordance with the contract. i SECTION 3r:. That the City Council authorizes the expenditure of funds in the amount of Thirty-Five Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($35,000.00) for the purchase price of said property and any I additional closing costs which may be incurred in the purchase. C1'I0N IV. That this ordinance shall become effective imTadiately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of - , 1990. J BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY I{ f I BYt APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY is C P k BY: 490il C MJ~ A . ♦ 1 t s THE STATE OF TEXAS 5 CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY COUNTY OF DENTON 4 _ day ' This agreement is made on to Denton, Texas, a m 1 1990, by and between the City and Lillian corporation, hereinafter hereinafter sreferred to as Irene Quesenberry, '%A 010) seller. It is agreed as follows! Seller agrees to sell to , 1. Agreement To Sell and ch Purchas from Sellers upon the terms and City and City agrees to par for the conaideinafter called he "property t)/asituatad is the ais real property (here Denton, State of Texas and described as } City of Dentont County of fol lo,•Is i Being all that cartain tract or parcel f land s Subdivisituated Oion in Denton County, Texas, and being a part No. 22 of the S.H.H. 6 C.R.R. Co. Survey, Scrip No. 111, Abet. 1183, and n the south l of the Texas and BEGINNING at a point wh ere the Eestibtoundary line of Lot 23 and c B.B.B. right-&ofC-.R.waysR. Co. curveY intersects said right- f E 23 and , o!-ways THENCE South with the east boundary line of Lots 23 and it 220 390.5 faett oflway with roadtuth THENCE i liner of the T. & P. directions 408 oot to the boundary THENCE in a North direction 502w feat ht Stheh p acne aof line of said right-of-way, beginning, containing 1.75 acres of land, more or less. isry, W. Hko 2. Escrow Agent. Lawyer's American Title1 512 Suits ILI$ Denton, Texas, is hereby designated as escrow and the Purchaser, on execution of this agreement, shall pay the escrow fee. 3. Purchase Price. The total purchasehpriie ro of shall Thirty-Five be the Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($35,000.00),nd all alahas of any solo compensation due Seller tfof they aPurchaser's acqui description proper r afori public purposes, is to be payable use of the property to Lawyer's American Title, as escrow agent as follows! 1 1 ~,LA iIwYR~ 1 Hv."tia~ i a141 1 ` k t . (a) One Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($10000.00) on the execution of this agreement, payable to Lawyer's American Title as earnest money. (b) The balance, in cash at closing on delivery to the escrow agent of a general warranty deed with full covenants, duly executed in proper form for recording so as to convey to the Purchaser a good and marketable record and title to the land free and clear of all recorded and unrecorded liens, assessments, leases, taxes, and encumbrances, restrictions and conditions, except public easements and rights-of-way of record. Purchaser shall take possession on the date of closing. 4. Title Insurance Policy. The Seller agrees, prior to the closing, to procure at the Purchaser's coat, from Lawyer's American Title, or another title company of Seller's choice acceptable to the Purchaser, a preliminary title report agreeing to ensure marketable title to the Purchaser in the full amount of tho purchase price and to ottain such policy to be issued by Lawyer's American Title, or such other approved title company. 5. Effect of Defective Title. Should the title prove defective in the opinion of the Purchaser's attorney, then such defect shall be pointed out in writing by letter delivered to the Seller after the delivery of such preliminary title report, and the Seller shall have thirty (30) days thereafter in which to cure such defects or, if agreed to by Purchaser in writing, prior to closing. 6. Fees, Charges and Costs. The Purchaser shall pay all recording fees, title searches, reconveyance fees, trustees' fees, forwarding feu for any full reconveyance of any deed of trust, and the premium charged for any policy of title insurance arising out of this transaction. Seller shall be responsible for the payment of all delinquent ad valorem property taxes, along with penalty and interest thereon, and the payment of ad valorem taxes for the current tax year, prorated to the date of closing. 7. Inability to Convey Title. In the event Seller is unable to convey good and marketable record and title to the land as provided for herein in the opinion of the Purchaser, then this agreement shall terminate and any amount tendered by Purchaser shall be returned to Purchaser. 8. Closing Date. The transactions shall be closed on or before one hundred eighty (180) calendar days from the date of acceptance of this agreement by the Seller and Purchaser, or at such other time as the parties may mutually arses, at the office of CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY/Page 2 u l ..111 S the escrow agent or at such other location as is mutually agreeable to the parties herein. 9. Integration. rhis agreement constitutes the entire agreement between ths. l'-a:t~_as and neither party relies upon any warrants or represat:ca_ion not contained herein. i Fn witness whereof, the parties have executed this agreement on t'.e date first above written. i i CITY OF DENTON, PURCHASER BY: BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY , s BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY i ~ s BY:~ lb ~ 1. LILLIAN IRENE QUESENBERRY, SELLER r; I pL1ls[ CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY/Page 3 THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DENTON § Thir instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of j , 1990 by Bob Castleberry, Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, a Municipal corporation, on behalf of said Municipal Corporation. NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF TEXAS i THE STATE OF TEXAS § j COUNTY OF DENTON § I his instrument was acknowledged before me on day of 1990 by Lillian Irene Quesenberry. l L • 4 NOT PU L C, STAT8 OF TEXAS quesenb.k f I CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY/Page 4 1Y N A =yam S Z ND 70 Gl A m D A n -i d N t' a m , G ti < r- p J' 3A 3 C r, ?'f A DM Fl v ul I Z " ' A AW M o ~ rD m w Dm c e mn rp ~r La D m o * < n r Ln a 1 v d (o D i L ~ a 1 D R (t' 9 Z S~ fV . '1 5 n i . T X.. "so is u is ~h w N I Z m Z 1 v SO x ' o is ot u it u to n u; u u u u is u u ot II I f I r4i m 3 D N AA fp r',~ ~ i ie! z u7~0 ~ LJ As is S., 8, u u is N of t ~I = W ► - _ {f1 v I N4 -404 Ile l' k ~~r re^. re ' i8-Yet-19 ;390 • 1991 ,^APITAL IYPIO'rppR PUN ` 0d;00 AN 96ItTIlC OSPAA110llA' t 1 IOD01 pI0.lICT 10MD CURIIIR AID-Ill can PIO11C1 OBSCIIPIIGN 1GtAL iVlm IBYIIAII CCY8811CTI0Y l FISCAL TIAS 10 90•n-Ol NsietYorYshaq A Naee6owo 100 ISO 0 0 0 90-U-01 Stick Naltokat, All CsiU too ISO 0 0 0 90.0-01 Meg Tall I koipnst 10 0 40 0 0 90.12.01 lisp Offite k0ipolat 11 0 11 0 0 WINS Spouer glut Socwitq 31 0 SS 0 0 l0•lP-Ol tin Protoctias 54 0 14 0 0 90-IP-01 Plut PsrYim 1 0 I 0 0 10.0.01 Lorialilit 1 Iloctric 11410 11110 0 D 0 30-U-DI ap lo6orts 97iro Ilutrie 11131 11411 0 0 0 90-0-10 Ay lowu 11160corp Pialtocl 311 111 0 0 0 sal-VAL IL MIC pI0D0C110N 1,161 11109 111 0 0 j 90.111.Ol Stroot LiSYtiog • Iuldoetinl 13 0 13 40 0 If-M-03 Stmt Lipbtisi - ArtorW 11 13 0 0 0 90.6111-03 Street Liiltlel • Saaitp Llphtl 11 0 11 0 0 10.OL-04 Notar Pal Ieplacent 40 0 31 0 1 SUI-VAL =C s1lM LI2TOO 113 13 104 40 1 10.10.01 0111 Istowiou ud Iapro m"t ISO ISO 0 0 0 10.10.01 Pow tutor Iap"Mosta I9 9S 0 0 0 t 90 ID 01 Uw1t(rae i bt I lApto"G ate S61 141 0 01 0 9o-"4 Info on I. ksipmt Sit 011 0 0 0 iO-ID-01 Notar Pal Wplu%"t 101 0 61 0 ill i6.10.01 NiseolIuooat tools i kaipeat 10 0 10 0 0 10.10.01 hot-o1•Ny Wan4 11 0 46 0 0 90.10.01 Icamie Ndoe Collector 1. Ili 0 b SlS 0 0 91-ID-01 01110 Unit ewd Carmiam 100 0 100 1 0 90-1D•10 Mettle Invite Cutar 000 600 0 0 0 10.10.11 Pw" of lloctrie tuilitie 000 S00 0 0 0 101.101111 LILT11C XMIMION 41114 11363 ill IS 111 10•IIhII N1tm i Auutstad Igeiptat 16 10 u 0 0 10.111 OI UPIM Unit 11111 l1 0 I 0 t IO•iN-11 Nisalluars fooli I keipat 10 0 10 0 0 IO.111.04 Lad Noayoeoet Prone Ise 110 0 1 0 0.11.01 auntie N1ta klipwt so 0 so o p S01.10tAL tLILi1t3C rum 311 110 93 0 1 cyHIBIT ~f 1 ~ 3O•EC•01 Redto C+puitot Control 10 0 70 7 U 90 8C Oi Cntr11 Din4tch Center 100 100 0 0 J 211 D 0 NO 1 }0•iC•07 sus-TOTAL as OTAL am, a r f ILIC11to ZS 0 IC COIAAINICATIOMI SIS 700 IS J 9 90•Is-u Mileelllanae 10011 S Iquiirnt ti 0 is D D 90.63.01 BuutiFT lbrtl Lin 801e. 10 10 0 9 0 }0.113.07 8eplace Ueit I101 0 0 1 Q 0 90.93.01 Bettetp Iepltauet is SS 0 90.18.01 auildig She11 30 70 0 0 0 }0•II.H atun We SO 0 SO 0 0 10114 01 Future 611, DntOa Mnt SO 10 0 0 0 . SUS-ITAL 1L3M73fIC SiR3TAIN 113 106 61 0 1 10.1118.01 It1C. Off. Tquip1puraitun 61 0 is 0 0 10.61[1.01 War pool • 13 bhut 16104 it D 1 0 ! i 90.31119.03 Iffid IvAtin pr HO 0 330 0 0 - , aM - 1 Mer it lal f16 0 h a • j SO-11111-05 all Sap Into 3O0 100 0 SUI.MI, LICTIIC W. Ilse. 1,11E 613 Is! 0 s TOTALS ?a TIAI. 1910 CV SD,731 I,S31 ISIS 611 IN ~ { i i 1 I i4 1 fill + 4 r ^K t 1 7 7 rWu GOLF COURSE A c t 1104 i 03 4 M 1 trl 4,00Ae ; t. , ~ rye CJ7Y ' l t lJVr tRJ~C &AA' rexAS sr. - I`= 100 14 J ~y j C tit w ~ Il,f Ae 4 J ~j1 owl Ate„ EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES July 23, 1994 8. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONTRACT TO PURCHASE 1.75 ACRE TRACT WITH HOUSE FROM MS. IRENE OUESENBERRY IN THE AMOUNT OF 3¢ 5x000. Nelson gave an overview of this item advising that this area would be used for storage of electric materials such as transformers, etc. Frady made a motion to recommend to the Planning and zoning commission and the City Council that the Utility Department purchase this lot for the use of the Department and, if other departments should use the property, rental monies I would be assessed from such using departments by the Utility { similar to the manner in which rental money is assessed on the Service Center Buildirg. Second by LaForte. All ayes, I no nays, motion carried. ! i r I . 1 I i 1 CITY COUNCIL s f { M I 0 4r0 Y' t`*oO if s~ t August 07, 1990 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager RE: CONSIDER ORDINANCE GIVING APPROVAL OF AN ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ALAN PLUMMER AND ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED FOR PERMIT COMPLIANCE AT A 12 MGD FLOW RATE. RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of July 23, 1990, recommended to the City Council approval of the Engineering Services Agreement with Alan Plummer and Associates. BACKGROUND: At the June 27, 1990, meeting of the Public Utilities Board, the Board selected Alan Plummer and Associates to provide the engineering services required to upgrade the existing wastewater treatment plant and instructed Staff to begin contract negotiations. Included as Exhibit. I is the engineering services agreement for the Pecan Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. SUMMARY: I The major activities outlined in the proposed engineering services contract are as follows: 1. The Wastewater Treatment Plant performance will be 1+ evaluated to determine the actual treatment capacities of the existing facility at the proposed permit compliance levels. 2. A preliminary design report will be developed that will outline the required improvement to meet a 15 MOD flow rate. In addition, the report will outlino the ultimate site development plan that will include the consideration of adding phosphorous removal facilities. 3. Once the plant uprating and preliminary design report are completed, a detailed Scope of Work for the professional services required for the Detailed Design Phase are initiated by written authorization from Denton. I F J' + w ;1 U I+ Page 2 Alan Plummer 6 Associates i 4. Prior to the completion and approval of the detailed design phase, a detailed Scope of Work for the construction phase services will be provided by the engineer. These services will be initiated upon written authorization by Denton. Included as Exhibit II is the anticipated schedule for the project activities. FISCAL IMPACT: Phase I Plant Uprating Analysis $ 81,802 Preliminary Design Report $105,897 Phase II (To be determined upon completion of Phase I activities) Phase III (To be determined upon completion of Phase II activities) PROGRAMS, GROUPS OR DEPARTMENTS AFFECTEDs Citizens of Denton, Denton Municipal Utilities, Legal j Department, Alan Plummer and Associates, J Respe ully,sub ted, Lloy v. Harrell, C y Manager Prepared by! 1 Howard Martin, Director of - 1 Environmental Operations/ 1 Financial Administration AEPrxy~py, .ER Nelson, Executive Director Department of Utilities Exhibit I ordinance II Proposed Engineering Services Agreement III Project 3chedule IV PUS Minutes of July 23, 1990 CCAGEN.807 I I 1 , Fr r 4 ~ 1• Y E i rlP,u r~ r TIME SCHEDULE ENGINEERING SERVICES for WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS Completion Cost Date _ Phase 08/90 o Approval of Engineering Services Contract PHASE I Plant Performance Analysis/Preliminary_Qesign Phase o Plant Uprating Analysis (b 81,802) 02/0391 /91 o Preliminary Design Report ($105,897) PHASE II Detailed Design Phase for 12 MGD Permit Compliance o Authorize Engineering Services 08/91 o Prepare Detailed Plans/Specification o Submit Plans/Specifications to State for Approval o Revised Construction Cost 10/91 o Furnish 10 Sets of Final Plans PHASE III Construction Phase for 112 MGD 04/91 o Authorize Engineering Services o Value Engineering Contract (est $50,000) o Issue Specifications 10/91 11/92 o Award Construction Contract 03/93 o Complete Construction PHASE IV- Detailed Design for Upgrade to 15 MGD o Award Engineering Contract 01/92 01/93 o Complete Engineering 04/93 o issue specifications 02/93 p Award Construction Contract 09/94 o Complete Construction 1 EXHIBIT 1 6814U:1 I i From) am I t EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES July 23, 1990 i 12. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ALAN PLUMMER AND ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED FOR PERMIT COMPLIANCE AT A 12 MGD FLOW RATE. After discussion, Chew made a motion to recommend to the City Council approval of the Engineering Agreement with Alan Plummer and Associates, Inc. Second by La Forte. All ayes, no nays, motion carried. i ; i r!F f CCMIN s ; { f ~ ~I ( {C P F 2963L i ORDINANCE NO. I AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND ALAN PLUMMER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR PRO- FESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES; APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. i THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the City Council hereby approves and autho- rizes the Mayor and City Secretary to execute and attest, re- spectively, the agreement between the City of Denton and Alan Plummer and Associates, Inc. for the design of wastewater treat- ment facilities at the Pecan Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant, under the terms and conditions contained in said agreement which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION ii. That the City Council authorizes the expenditure of fun3s5-7F a manner as specified in the agreement, not to exceed ` One Hundred Eighty-Nine Thousand Six Hundred Ninety-Nine and No/100 ($189,699) Dollars. ` SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective II immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1990. i BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR f ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY. t. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADA11I DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: l ,f F u r: •r• 2962L c t } ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE DESIGN OF PECAN CREEK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the day of , 1990, by and between the City of Denton, with its pr ncipa o ice at 215 East McKinney Street, Denton, Denton Countyr Texas 76201, ('OWNER') and Alan Plummer and Associates, Inc.r with its principal office at 841 West Mitchell Street, Arlington, Tarrant Countyr Texas 76013, b0h3, hereinafter ecal td the ("ENGINEER') acting herein, by an duly authorized so to act for and in behalf of said ENGINEER. - WITNESSETH, that in consideration herethedcovenant mutually and agree agree as ments herein contained, the parties follows: ARTICLE I EMPLOYMENT OF ENGINEER The OWNER agrees to employ the ENGINEER, and the ENGINEER agrees to perform professional engineering services in connection with the Project as stated in the sections to follow, and for having s service3l sttd in t the OWNER section agrees to follow ay to the ENGINEER rendered such compensation a The Project shall include design of wastewater treatment facilities at the Pecan Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). The ENGINEER agrees to exercise the same degree of care, skill and diligence in the performance of these services as is ordinarily provided by a professional consultant under similar circumstances r and ENGINEER shall# at no cost which fit to satisfy the foregoing t standard of r performance8ervices ARTICLE II PERIOD OF SERVICE This Agreement shall become effective upon execution by the of period OWNER and the ENGINEER and shall remain in force for the which may reasonably be required for the di clupaw Add coni tract, and construction of the Project, Services and any required extensions approved by the OWNER. i I R ~ ti Y ARTICLE III t BASIC ENGINEERING SERVICES The ENGINEERS shall render the following professional services for development of the PROJECT: PHASE I - EVALUATION AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE +xas+ Upon execution of this Agreement the ENGINEER shall: A. Consult with OWNER: (1) to review the scope of work, (2) to verify the OWNER's requirements for the Project, and (3) to review available data. B. Advise OWNER as to the necessity of OWNER's providing or obtaining data or services from others, and assist the OWNER in connection with any such services. C. Prepare a flow chart showing key project milestones in- cluding Phase I through III. The flow chart will be updated monthly and sent to the OWNER. The ENGINEER understands that the OWNER desires the final construction phase of the project (facilities required to meet the ne•: wastewater discharge permit requirements at a flow rate of 12 MGD) to be in operation within 30 months of issuance of the new wastewater discharge permie; however, the OWNER acknowledges that the ENGINEER is only one of the many parties involved in the project and that the ENGINEER cannot assure completion of the project by a specific date. D. All for,nal workshops and quality control reviews will be held in the ENGINEER's Office. E. Perform an Uprating Evaluation of the Pecan Creek Waste- ; water Treatment Plant. The Uprating Evaluation would { consist of the following tasks: Plant Uprating Evaluation 1. collect three to five years of daily plant operating records including (if available): a) influent flow, BOD, TSS, NH3-N b) effluent (discharge) flow, BOD, TSS, NH3-N C) BOD, TSS, NH3-N into aeration basins d) MLSS in basins, sludge return rate, waste sludge flow, DO, total air flow 2, Review treatment plant historical operational data in- PAGE 2 the rimar + HOD and suspended solids raeration nbasin Psolids einoval eluding ystems, and secondary treatment information relevant to levels, and other Peminent s last. operation of the treatment p 3. Determine the capacity of the various treatment units based on Texas Water Commission design criteria• am t ether to g 4. Design a detailed sampling and testing progr u rt an additional plant perfinent. plant acapacity* tThede ailed rating of the treatcot will be performed by the upsampling and testing P gram laboratory employed by OWNER or an independent testing the OWNER. 5. Evaluate operation procedures and identify O6M concerns, rkshop with the OWNER toureview the rther testinga 6. Conduct a wo Pro- termine the requirements for any f de i grams. based on 7, perform aeration system efficiency testing (OUR) Steady state analysis- oxygen uptake Rate rates for each treatmet S, unitulbased lon a operating ngdata and actual operating conditions. s Of i influent data. loadings based on 9, Determine appropriate statistical analY ent unite and hydraulic capacity of treatm 10. Determine e by blower system. _ capacity of existing air eatment unit to for each tr 11. Determine maxime1mi~ oading meet required p lent lye Determine sizing for equalization basin based on plant peak flow records. based on the 13. Determine actual plant capacity rating revised permit limits. 14. Prepare Technical Memorandum presenting the results of review by the OWNER and the the Up[ating evaluation for technical review committee. of plant uprating 15. Perform quality control review evaluation. . Present ten copies of final evaluation results to OWNER. 16 PAGE 3 1 I -T I f i ` 17. Attend one (1) meeting with Texas Water commission (TWO staff in Austin to review the results of the ` plant evaluation study and discuss the proposed uprating of the wastewater treatment plant. I F. Prepare a Preliminary Design Rnport containing schematic layouts and sketches as follows: Preliminary Design Report 1. Develop schematic layout of new aeration equipment in h the north aeration basins and dechlorination facil- ities. 2. Develop sizing, piping, and preliminary layout of sludge belt press facility included in the 1990 Wastewater Treatment Plant Master Plan. (Consideration will be given to the impact of the Enviro sludge disposal method { on the building layout.) I` 3. Determine location, sizing, and piping required for t equalization basin. 4. Determine hydraulic improvements necessary to treat plant flows. 5. From plant uprating evaluation, recommend improvements required to meet discharge permit parameters at existing flow, ! 6. Prepare itemized list and schematic layouts of treatment unit improvements necessary for increased capacity to 15 I{ MGD and the additional capacity and an opinion of pro- bable cost associated with each improvement. These improvements are to be based on codisposal of Taste activated sludge in the municipal landfill. 7. Review the support facilities and buildings recommended in the 1990 Wastewater Treatment Plant Master Plan with the OWNER. Based on the need for improved support facil- ities and buildings, as determined by the OWNER, include the cost shown in the Master plan for these facilities in the opinion of cost for the project. 8. Based on projected flows shown in the 1990 Wastewater Treatment Plant Master Plan or updated by the OWNER, develop an implementation schedule of further improve- ments to meet projected demands. 9. Develop a conceptual layout drawing of the ultimate site development based on the city receiving a more stringent PAGE 4 1 F r.., f i o- discharge requirement for phosphorous removal. The 1990 Wastewater Treatment Plant Master Plan layout for 20 MGD will be used as the basis for developing the overall ultimate site development plan. The plan will address on-site liquid and solids treatment) however, sludge disposal by landfilling or other means will not be addressed in this study. 10. Develop recommended initial construction project with opinions of probable cost and submit Draft copy of Preliminary Design Report for review by the OWNER and technical review committee. 11. Perform Quality Control rF:view for Preliminary Design Report, 12. Preparv twenty-five (25) copies of the final Preliminary Design Report for submittal to the OWNER. A presenta- tion of the Uprating Evaluation and the Preliminary Design report will be made to the Denton Public Utility Board and Denton City Council, a total of two formal presentations, in Denton. 13. Attend two (2) meetings with TWC staff in Austin: one to present the initial approach to the project and one to present the final proposal for uprating plant capacity and preliminary design of proposed improvements. G. Phase II - Detailed Design Phase The scope of work for this phase is a general outlit.e of services to be provided and is based on the understanding of h the project at this time. Upon completion of Phase I, Evaluation and Preliminary Design Phase, a detailed scope of work for Phase II, Detailed Design Phase, will be furnished to the OWNER. authorization After written shall provide professionalservices in this OWNER, phase h as follows: 1. Prepare detailed plans, specifications, contract docu- constructed. Surveys, laifut furnishedproareenAdditional services. 2. Provide the OWNER with advice, when requested, with res- pect to the making of all subsurface investigations, ~ and lother subsurface e explorationsi however,ithe®making of such investigations and the interpretations of data and reports by special consultants are not a part of PAGE 5 I R ~ s t I I the services to be rendered by the ENGINEER, and the cost therefore shall be paid by the OWNER. The ENGINEER shall monitor and review the work of ; testing laboratories and inspection bureaus required I for the testing or inspectionfof theerialsot witnessed Proje, but the tests, factory testing, c., or i W cost of such laboratory tests or inspection shall be paid by the OWNER. i 3. Furnish the OWNER, when requested, the engineering data I lications for routine permits reuired necessary for app uired by local, state and federal auth s.documents for of detailed applications and supporting government grants planning advances, or discharge permit renewals will be provided as Additional Services, if required. 4. Submit plans, sfederalaanddstate agencyls)tforcapproval, { the applicable where required. ' 5. Furnish such information necessary to utility companies whose facilities may be affected or services may be required for the Project. fo ms (project quantities)dofothe 6, andpbidder'lsspropo al opinion ` improvements to be constructed. 7. Conduct Quality Control (QC) workshops utilizing senior staff members with experience acceptable e to the OWNER. QC workshops are to be held at approximatly 30, 0 and i 95 percent complete milestones of Phase iI Detailed ` Design. sets of copies of plans, 8. Furnish the OWNER three (3) I specifications, and bid proposals marked OPrel maths for approval by the OWNER. Upon final approval by OWNER, the ENGINEER will provides dthe OWNER irected by nth10)sets O'WNERp ` of copies of 'Final' plans. additional sets of plans, specifications and bid docu- ments as are necessary in the receipt of bids for con- struction and as are required in the th eNexecutiando the project, shall be furnished by be paid for by the OWNER at actual cost of reproduction. f~ J I ~-1 H. Phase Iii - Construction Phase Services ` Prior to completion of the detailed phase and approval. of 'Final' plans and specifications by the OWNER, a detailed I PAGE 6 i I FF, . x s scope of work for Phase III, Construction Phase Services, will be furnished to the OWNER. After written authorization from the OWNER, the ENGINEER will proceed with the performance of services in this phase as follows: 1. Assist the OWNER in securing bids, issuing notice to bidders and notifying construction news publications. The notice to bidders will be furnished to the OWNER for publication in the local news media. The cost for publications shall be paid by the OWNER. 2. Assist the OWNER in the opening, tabulation, and analysis of the bids received and furnish recommenda- tions on the award of contracts or the appropriate actions to be taken by the OWNER. 3. Assist in the preparation of formal contract documents for construction contracts. 4. Assist in conducting pre-construction conference(s) with the Contractor(s), review construction schedules prepared by the Contractor(s), and prepare a proposed estimate of monthly cost requirements of the project. 5. Make two visits each month of the site (as distinguished from the continuous services of a Resident Project Rep- resentative) to observe the progress and the quality of i work and to attempt to determine in general if the work is proceeding in accordance with the contract documents. , In performing these services, the ENGINEER will endeavor i to protect the OWNER P.gainst defects and deficiencies f in the work of Contractors. The ENGINEER will report i any observed defects or deficiencies immediately to the 1 OWNER. However, it is understood that the ENGINEER Y does not guarantee the Contractor's performance nor is f he responsible for supervision of the Contractor's Ik operation and employees. ENGINEER shall not be respon- sible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction selected by Contractor or the safety precautions and programs incident to the work of the Contractor. 6. Consult and advise with the OWNER during construction, , + make recommendations to the OWNER regarding materials and workmanship, and prepare change orders with OWNER'S approval. r 7. Review samples, catalog data, schedules, shop drawings, laboratory, shop and mill tests of material and equip- PAGE 7 ) I ~II FF ~ e 1 r i ment and other data pursuant to the General Conditions of the Construction Contract. 8. Assist the OWNER in arranging for testing of materials and laboratory control during construction to be con- ducted at the OWNER's expense. 9. Interpret the intent of the plans and specifications for the OWNER and Contractor(s). Investigations, analyses, and studies requested by the Contractor(s) and approved by the OWNER, for substitutions of equipment and/or materials or deviations from the plans and specifica- tions will be considered an additional servic^. NOTE: Such studies conducted by the ENGINEER, if -etermined to be inadequate, due to incompleteness of ENGINEER pre- pared plans and specifications, will be redone without additional compensation. Any defective des?gns, plans or specifications furnished by the ENGINEER shall be promptly corrected by the ENGINEER at no cost to the 0. „BR. 10. Rc-►ew and comment on monthly and final estimates for pa)nent to Contractor(s), pursuant to the Gene,:al Condi- tions of the Construction Contract. 11. Conduct, in company with the OWNER's representative, a { final inspection of the Project for conformance with a f the design concept of the Project and general compliance with the contract documents, and review and comment on the certificate of completion and the recommendation i for final payment to the Contractor(s). { + 12. Revise the construction drawings in accordance with the information furnished by construction Contractor(s) j ` reflecting changes in the Project made during construc- tion. One set of reproducible prints of 'Record Draw- ings" shall be provided by the ENGINEER to the OWNER. 13. The ENGINEER will contact the OWNER's operating staff ten (10) months after the date of final acceptance to determine warranty items to be addressed by the Contractor. j ARTICLE IV ADDITIONAL SERVICES Additional services to be performed by the ENGINEER, if auth- orized by the OWNER, which are not included in the above described basic services, are described as follows: PAGE B ~ 1 i rte, I #~4T 1 WTI 11 i S 1 S{ f o- A, Field Surveying required for the preparation of designs, drawings and plans including topographic survey of the plant site. B. Field layouts or the furnishing of construction line and grade surveys. C. Investigations involving detailed consideration of opera- tion, maintenance and overhead expenses, and the prepara- tion of rate schedules, earnings and expense statements, feasibility studies, appraisals, evaluations, assessment schedules, and material audits or inventories required for certification of force account construction performed by the OWNER. D. Making necessary property, boundary and right-of-way sur- veys, preparation of easement and deed descriptions, in- cluding title search and examination of deed records. Providing a land agent or public relations specialist to assist the OWNER in obtaining easements. E. Preparing applications and supporting documents for govern- ment grants, loans, or planning advances and providing data for detailed applications. F. Providing shop, mill, field or laboratory inspection of materials and equipment. i i+. Preparing any required operation and Maintenance Manuals or { conducting operator training and preparing Environmental Impact Assessments or Statements. H. Appearing before regulatory agencies or courts as an expert witness in any litigation with third parties or condemnation proceedings arising from the development or J construction of the Project, including the preparation of engineering data and reports for assistance to the OWNER. 1. Furnishing the services of a Resident Project Representa- tive to act as the OWNER's on-site representative during the construction phase, if requested by the OWNER. If the j ENGINEER is requested to visit the site more frequently than two (2) visits each month as set forth in Section III, Paragraph 11,5, the requested visits shall be con- sidered as an Additional Service and the ENGINEER shall be entitled to additional compensation. If OWNER desires the service of a resident project engineer, a separate agreement shall be executed by the parties. J. Assisting the OWNER in claims disputes with Contractor(s). K. Performing investigations, studies and analyses of substf.- PAGE 9 I i lJ t tutions of equipment and/or materials or deviations from the plans and °pecifications. L. prosecu- connection defense or i addition to tion Assisting liOtig tin in contractor those services contemplated by this Agreement. Such ser- vices, if any, shall be furnished by ENGINEER on a fee basis negotiated by the respective parties outside of and in addition to this Agreement. M. Sampling, testing or analysis beyond that specifically included in Basic Services. N. elec- data copies of Computr drawings, or Aided for the OWNER's fuse tronic Preparing in a future CAD system. O. Providing video camera with video tapes of conFcruction phase to be used as a historical record and for operator training. P. Attendance at additional meetings beyond those specif- ically noted in Basic Services required by TWC, other regulatory agencies or the OWNER. Q, Preliminary Design of support facilities and buildings, additional sludge digestion facilities, and ultimate sludge disposal facilities (sludge only landfill or addi- Master t plan. commended in tional the 1990 sludge Wastewater Treatment Plant equipment) R. Any additional services required by the OWNER not included in Basic Services. ARTICLE V RESPONSIBILITIES OF OWNER the followi The OWNER shall e of the ENGIN ERin a timely manner so as not to Y the A. Designate in writing a person to act as the OWNER's repre- sentative with respect to the services to be rendered under this Agreement, Such person shall have contract authority to transmit instructions, receive information, and withrrespect todthefeinENGINEERe the Projections B, Provide all criteria and full information as to the OWNER's requirements for the Project, including design objectives and constraints, space, capacity and performance require- PAGE 10 r ~ Y Y ments, flexibility and expandability, and any budgetary limitations) and furnish copies of all design and construc- tion standards which the OWNER will require to be included in the Drawings and Specifications, C. Assist the ENGINEER by placing at the ENGINEER's disposal all available information pertinent to the Project includ- ing previous reports and any other data relative to design a or construction of the Project. D. Arrange for access to and make all provisions for the ENGINEER to, enter upon public and private property as J required for the ENGINEER to perform services under this 1 Agreement, E. Examine all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifi- cations, proposals and other documents presented by the ENGINEER, obtain advice of an attorney, insurance coun- selor and other consultants as the OWNER deems appropriate for such examination and render in writing decisions per- taining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of the ENGINEER. F. Furnish approvals and permits from all governmental auth- orities having jurisdiction over the Project and such i approvals and consents from others as may be necessary for completion of the Project. G, The OWNER shall make or arrange to have made all subaurface investigations, including but not limited to borings, test pits, soil resistivity surveys, and other subsurface explo- rations. The OWNER shall also make or arrange to have made the interpretations of data and reports resulting from such investigations. All costs associated with such investigations shall be paid by the OWNER. H. The OWNER shall make or arrange to have made all testing and sampling required at the wastewater treatment plant or in the collection system including flows, SOD and suspended solids, concentrations, aeration basin solids levels, and other pertinent information relevant to operation of the treatment plan, All costs associated with such testing and sampling shall be paid by the OWNER. I. Provide such accounting, independent cost estimating and insurance counseling services as may be required for the Project, such legal services as the OWNER may require or the ENGINEER may reasonably request with regard to legal issues pertaining to the Project, including any that may be raised by the CONTRACTOR(s). PAGE 11 I I ~aPer:, WVP~ i t ,a;w I I i i J. The OWNER shall determine, prior to receipt of construc- tion bid, if the ENGINEER is to furnish Resident Project Representative service so the Bidders can be informed. A K. If OWNER designates a person to represent the OWNER at the site who is not the ENGINEER or ENGINEER's agent or employee, the duties, responsibilities and limitations of authority of such other person and the effect thereof on the duties and responsibilities of the ENGINEER will be set forth in an agreement that is to be identified, attached to this Agreement, and a copy of which shall be furnished ENGINEER before such services begin. L. Attend the pre-bid conference, bid opening, pre-construc- tion conferences, construction progress and other job re- lated meetings and substantial completion inspections and final payment inspections, M. Give prompt written notice to the ENGINEER whenever the OWNER observes or otherwise becomes aware of any develop- ment that affects the scope or timing of the ENGINEER's services, or any defect or nonconformance of the work of any contractor. i N. Furnish, or direct the ENGINEER to provide, Additional services as stipulated in Article IV of this Agreement or other services as required. 0. Provided transportation such as airline fare, automobile rental or subsistence required for the OWNER's personnel to attend project meetings or inspection trips. P. Bear all costs incident to compliance with the requirements of this Article V. ARTICLE VI COMPENSATION A, COMPENSATION TERNS: 1. "Salary Cost" is defined as the cost of salary (pay- roll) for engineers, draftsmen, stenographers, sur- veyors, clerks, laborers, etc., for time directly chargeable to the Project, plus Social Security contributions, unemployment compensation, insurance retirement benefits, medical and insurance benefits, disability payments, sick leave, vacation and holiday pay applicable thereto. (Salary cost is equal to 1.35 times salary.) PAGE 12 W A■■ I° r' i. r 2. "Subcontract Expense' is defined as the expense that is incurred by the ENGINEER in employment of others in out- sef foundation side firms for services in thenature borings, testing, surveying, a similar 3 'Direct for expense any Non-Labor defined ENGINEER that sup- plies, transportation and equipment, rfromf home uni- cations, subsistence and lodging away n and similar incidentals in connection with that assign- ment. B. BASIC SERVICES: For and in consideration of Phase I - Evaluation and Pre- liminary Design Phase of the Basic Services to be rendered by the ENGINEER, the OWNER agrees to with base dtotalhe Sche- dule of Charges shown in Exhibit At t fee not to exceed One Hundred Eighty-Seven Thousand Six Hundred and Ninety-Nine Dollars ($189)699). The total not to exceed amount is based on an estimated amount of $81,802 for the Plant Uprating Evaluation and an estimated amount of $105,897 for the PrEliminary Design made on pore. basistial payments to the ENGINEER will be by the OWNERI monthly statements rendered to and approved however, under no circumstances shall any monthly state - renthe value of work dered. The OWNER mayf withhold statementexceed thettifor me a services the final 5% of the contract amount until completion of the project. - Detailed Prior to ENGINEER shall eubmit bay maximum Phase for Phase Analysis Design Phase and Phase III - Construction Phase Services for ova attached tolanof the d made OaNpart ofethiseAgreement m for e Engineer- ing Services. Nothing contained in this article shall require city to pay for any work which is unsatisfactory as reasonably deter- mined by the Executive Director of Utilities or which is not submitted in compliance with the terms of this Con- tract. City shall not be required to make any payments to the ENGINEER when the ENGINEER is in default under this Contract. it is specifically understood and agreed that the ENGINEER shall not be authorized to undertake any work sNERAgreement cha gea expense adiitional any which the OW the xi authorization from the CANER. E GINEER first shall obtained written not PAGE 13 I i i MN.. M!F> Mproceed to perform the services listed in Phase II, Detailed Design, or Phase III, Construction Phase, without obtaining prior written authorization from OWNER. C. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 1. For Resident Representation During Construction and construction Layout. For the resident representation duri,lg construction and construction layout (Article IV.I), the ENGINEER shall be paid based on the Schedule of Charges in Exhibit A. Payments for resident project representation and construction layout shall be due and payable upon submission of statements by the ENGINEER. Statements shall not be submitted more frequently than monthly. For additional services in Article IV, the ENGINEER shall be paid based on the Schedule of Charges shown is Exhibit A. Payments for additional services shall be due and payable upon submission by the ENGINEER. State- ments shall not be submitted more frequently than monthly. D. PAYMENT If the OWNER fails to make payments due the ENGINEER for services and expenses within sixty (60) days after receipt of the ENGINEER'S statement therefore, the amounts due the { ENGINEER will ~e icucreased at the rate of 1 percent (1') per month from said sixtieth (60th) day. In addition, the ENGINEER may, after giving sever, (7) days' written notice f to the OWNER, suspend services under this Agreement until the ENGINEER has been paid in full all amounts due for services, expenses and charges. Any applicable new taxes imposed upon services, expenses, and charges by any govern- mental body after the execution of this contract will be 1 added as necessary to the ENGINEER's compensation. ARTICLE VII TIME OF COMPLETION ` . The ENGINEER will commence work on the Project immediately upon execution of this contract. The ENGINEER shall complete the work in accordance with the following schedule: ITEM SUBMIT DRAFT REPORT FOR REVIEW BY OWNER Technical Memorandum - 150 days after receipt of authorization Wastewater Treatment to proceed (February 1, 1991)' i PAGE 14 j 1 i `I r I I plant Uprating evaluation preliminary Design 180pdays after receipt of authorization Report +BBaasea on receipt of authorization to proceed by September 18 1990. SECTION VIII OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST noan opinion Of t guarantee thebaccuracystof ceuch The ENGINEER 'Will but furnish cost of the work$ , estimates. Opinions of probable construction coat, financial evaluations, feasibility studies, economic analyses of alternate solutions and utilitarian the iderations m demonntheabasisoof prepared by the ENGINEER'S experience and qualifications and represent the ENGINEER's best judgment as an experienced and qualified design professional. It is recognized, however, that the ENGINEER does not have control over the cost of labor, material, equipment or services furnished by others or over market conditions or tractoca' methods of determining their prices, and that any util- itarian evaluation of any facility to be constructed or work to be performed on the basis of the Report must be necessity be Accordingly, speculative until completion of its detailed design coats will not from opinionah,aevaluations, or i studieacsub1 the ENGINEER o s vary no gua mitted by the ENGINEER to the OWNER here.:nder. ARTICLE I8 REVISION TO PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The OWNER reserves the right to direct u stantt a Oevi ion ; of the Plans and Specifications after approval by as OWNER may deem necessary, but in such event the OWNER shall pay to the ENGINE Just rand evisions, equitable compensation for services rendered making such { ARTICLE x i OBSERVATION AND REVIEW 09 THE WORK The ENGINEER will in the work ofocontracto rep by observation facts and ~ PAGE 15 t ~,~illfMtI 1 1 P 1 ' I~ of the work as it progresses, by interpretation of the plans, specifications and ndisapprovaltofcdefectivemwo k as may be observed tractors, by from the OWNER with respect to i~ and the issuance of stop-orders nship where they are observed, and defective material and workma the ENGINE thatilth eXworks be udone 1 in naccordancei with eplansRand - specifications; tractor with thebOWNERe andTtheTENGINEER rdoes nnotdguaranteecthe performance of such construction contra ENGINEER set forth in Article III.H.S and Article IV.I, iques, sequences, or responsible for the means, methods, tthechne CONTRACTOR, s the procedures of construction selected by safety precautions and programs incident to the work of the CONTRACTOR. ARTICLE XI OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS All documents prepared or furnished by the ENGINEER (and ENGINEER's independent associates and consultants) pursuant to shal re- I this Agreement are and instrumentsof herein, The OWNER may main an ownership such documents areonotsl tfor endedformreprese t drtoeben suitablevfor make and retain reuse by the OWNER or others. Any reuse by the OWNE3 without written verification or adaptation by the ENGINEER will be at. the abi OWNER's lit ENGINEER, solos tos the ENGINEER'sl i d pendent associates re consul-tants, and the OWNER shall indemnify and hold harmless the ENGI- NEER and ENGINEER's da, independent eandae peneese iand ncludingltattorneys'~ all claims# , damagage es, losses such verifica- tion arising out of at resulting therefrom. AnY sada fur ther sationrat ratestto beiagreediupon by thevOWNER and the ENGINEER. sati ARTICLE XII INDEMNITY AGREEMENT The ENGINEER shall indemnify and save harmless the OWNER and ~ its officers, agents, and employees from the liability of t OWNER on account of any injuries or damages received or sustained y, including court costs and by any person attorneys persona or propert the OWNER, proximately caused by tneglig fees incurred by operation, is caused by ant acts or omissions of the ENGINEER or its officers, ag of employees in the of this Agreementution, performance, s or In the event of liability from egligencec of nboth theiENGINEER 1 ing out of or occasioned by t PAGE 16 I i I Y fG ! L i and the OWNER, their agents or employees, in the this Agreement, each pa e toward PchQOSatiafacf tion of the liabilit party shall contribut be equal to the percentage its proportionate share, which share party, tage of negligence attributable to hall the ARTICLE XIII ARBITRATION No arbitration arising out of, or relating tor this involving one party to this Agreement may include the othere party ty to this Agreement without the other's approval, ARTICLE XIV TERMINATION OF CONTRACT This agreement may be terminated b days written notice. In the event y either party upon thirty ENGINEER will be paid for all servicesf any termination addition Properly rendered and reimbursable expenses incurred to the date of termination and the + all reimbursable expenses directly attributable+ to termination. Should city subsequent) Consultant for continuation of services onctherProfect r ENGINEER th a new shall cooperate in providing information. ARTICLE XV SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNMENTS The OWNER and the ENGINEER each are he partners, successo reb ra Y un + executors, bo a d and i entatives of the administrators and legal repree other part OWNER and the ENGINEER are hereby bound to the J executors y to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, e assigns) + administrators and legal representatives of such other land said agreements and obli party' in respect of a tions a 9 of covenants, t his Agreement, Neither the OWNER nor the ENGINEER shall assign, sublet or transfer any rights under of interest in (including, but without limitation, moneys that may become a that this Agreement without the written codue or nsent ofn h the rare due) to the extent that any assignment, subletting or traor is mant dated by law, Unless specifically Stated nsfethe to the contrary except written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty Y in any Agreement. Nothing contained n thlsor responsibility under this argraph shal pent the ENGINEER from employing such independents associat el and vconsul- tants as the ENGINEER may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of services hereunder, I PAGE 17 TRH ~ j V i IN j Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any 3 rights or benefits in this Agreement to anyone other than the OWNER and the ENGINEER, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and the OWNER and the ENGINEER and not for the exclusive benefit of r benefit of any other party. This Agreement, consisting of pages 1 to 19 with Exhibits as listed in Article XVI constitutes the ? entire Agreement between the OWNER and the ENGINEER and super- sedes all prior written or oral understandings. This Agreement may only be amended, supplemented, modified or cancelled by a E duly executed written instrument. ARTICLE XVI RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES j i Approval by CITY shall not constitute nor be deemed a release i of the responsibility and liability of the ENGINEER, its em- ployees, associates, agents, and consultants for the accuracy and competency of their designs or other w,irk1 nor shall such approval 1 be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by CITY for any defect in the design or other work prepared by the ENGINEER, its employees, subcontractors, agents, and consultants. ARTICLE XVII J NOTICES All notices, communications, and reports required or permit- i j ted under this Contract shall be personally delivered or mailed to the respective parties by depositing same in the United States mail at the addresses shown below, certified mail, return receipt requested unless and until either party is otherwise notified in writing by the other party at the following addresses. Mailed notices shall be deemed communicated as of three 4.-.ye mailing. if intended for CITY, to., if intended for ENGINEER, tot City of Denton Alan Plummer 6 Associates, Attn: Robert E. Nelson inc. Executive Director for Utilities 841 West Mitchell Street 215 East McKinney Street Arlington, Texas 76013 Denton, Texas 76201 Attn: MISCELLANEOUS ARTICLE XVIII A. The following exhibits ar3 attached to and made a part of this Agreement: EXHIBIT A - Schedule of Charges PAGE 18 1 i r r I F ! S. A waiver by either ENGINEER or CITY of any breach o a j provision of this contract shall not be binding upon the waiving party unless such waiver is in writing in the event of a written waiver, such a waiver shall not affect the waiving party's rights with respect to any other or future breach. This contract is executed in two counterparts. I~ CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i Bob Caat eberry, Mayor j ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY. I BY., ALAN PLUMMER AND ASSOCIATES, j INC., Engineer t i Alan H. Plummer, Jr., President r ~ i ATTEST: esident Jo n H. Cook, V ce Pr- k. PAGE 19 s.. c.. - _ -lump 777559 ~ 1 A n' t I d r T 1 i i EXHIBIT A I SCHEDULE OF CHARGES i Staff members (Salary x 1,35) + (Salary x 1.155) + Res ent Representation (Salary x 1,35) + (Salary x 1.355) Salary is defined as the cost of payroll of engineers, drafters, J stenographers, surveyors, clerks, laborers, etc., for time di- 7 rectly chargeable to the project. (Salary cost is equal to 1.35 times salary). I Subconsultants Charges Actual Cost Times Multiplier of 1.15 All Other Direct Expenses Actual Cost Times Multiplier of 1.00 Other direct expenses shall include printing and reproduction expense, communication expense, travel, transportation and sub- sistence away from the Eagineer's office and other miscellaneous expenses directly related to the work, including costs of labora- tory analysis, tests, and other work required to be done by inde- pendent persons or agents other than staff members or subconsul- tants. i I f ~ l I PAGE 20 I t I a i Y owl r KCW I t CITY COUNCIL, a 1% A ♦ 0 s 0 J COG G ~ L IY l I AMa i City ofD&NYON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING ' DENTON, TEX4S76201 / TELEPHONE( Bf71566.8200 } G' ~r MEMORANDUM f ~I I 7'0: Lloyd Y. Harrell , City Manager FROM: Catherine F. Tucl<, Administrative Assistant )ATE: AUgusi: 7. I99C; SIJBJFCT: "TREET CLOSUfi'~ --FOR "-COUNTY SEAT SATURDA T Y" The Central Business hCent a re District and the Main Street - SUb Guest to temporarily close the 111 Program have Elmo Hickory, and Locust from 6 a,m. to 6 blocky of Oak, September 15, 1991, for "Coi.inty Seat Satu P.M. on Saturday, Main Street Manager, will be Y•" Jane miles presenting this item in details the The petition was submitted by the Central Business the Main Steet Program. Approximate) 91% District and tile Sears are owner occupied. y of the businesses on buildings on the Square have The owned of the vacant following businesses do not signed the petition, rot appear to be represented on thTie signed petition but have been contacted; z 1l6 McBride Music & Pawn T & Sons General Merchandise It is ~ mY 1-indnrstanding throe Manager that there is not gh conversations with the Main Street those who disagreed did notlwishagreament to this event but that petition, to state their obJections on the Please let me know if I can provide additional information. Cathsrine~ETucj""~~i✓ Administrative Assistant F I \ 1 1 t ~/µr IWM~~ ~ / f ' y~~. DATES 08/07/90 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council I FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTS :ITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION REGARDING CLOSING THE 100 BLOCKS OF OAK, ELM, HICKORY, AND LOCUST FROM 6 A.M. - 6 P.M. ON SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 1990 FOR 'COUNTY SEAT SATURDAY' CELEBRATION 1 MiY~ I i Il RECOMMENDATION: j Recommend approval. BACKGROUND: I For five consecutive years, the Denton Central Bua!ness District Association has sponsored County Seat Saturday, a celebration on the Courthouse Square provided for the community by the do,rntown j businesses. This celebration has grown into one of the meet popusrr f f in Denton and last year attracted over 5,000 visitors to the t Square. To provide for the safety of the community and provide space for special events, it is necessary that the streets on :h: Square be closed from 6 a.:,:. - 6 p.m6 on the day of the event only, lie Denton County Commissioners Court has shown its support for this community ovent by granting permission to use the Courthouse and grounds without charge. PROGRAMS, DEPAF.TMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: ' None ! FISCAL IMPACTS None Reepe lly s bml t S C ed; ys Lloy a Harrell City Manager an Bil e, Manager n Street App v S r-o Ad He Robbins, AICP 3 Executive Director Planning and Development 2329x r j . i \ 1 ire. •,M b':•y.Y I ~r e S F j i t RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY CLOSING THE 100 BLOCK OF NORTH ELM STREET, THE 100 BLACK OF WEST OAK STREET, THE 100 BLACK OF NORTH LOCUST STREET AND THE lOn BLOCK OF WEST HICKORY STREET ON SEPTEMBER 15, 1990; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Central Business District was once the social and r't commercial center of Denton County; and WHEREAS, the merchants and professionals who continue to serve the people of Denton from within this historic district wish to commemorate the spirit and tradition of its past; and WHEREAS, since 1896, the "Court Square" area was transformed each Saturday from the seat of county government into the social gathering place for its citizens; and WHEREAS, that structure which remains the historical and € sentimental center of our county has undergone a restoration which will insure its continuing presence as a familiar landmark on the Denton horizon; and i WHEREAS, the Denton County Courthouse on the Square has reopened its doors to a proud public; and 11 WHEREAS, all abutting merchants and professionals surrounding the area have given their permission to the temporary closing of said streets; and WHEREAS, County Seat Saturday is open to the general public of + the City and County of Dentonj and WHEREAS, The temporary closing of certain streets is necessary in order to provide adequate space for County Seat Sacurday, and to protect the safety of citizens who attend; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: r SECTION I. That the 100 Block of North Elu Street, the 100 i Block of West Oak Street, the 100 Block of North locust Street and the 100 Block of West Hickory Street, comprising the "Courthouse Square", shall be temporarily closed as public streets on September 151 1990 from 6:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. for the purtose of holding "County Seat Saturday". SECTION Ii. That the City Manager shall direct the appropriate city Department to erect barricades at the 100 Block of North Elm street, 100 Block of West Oak Street, 100 Block of North Locust . Street and 100 Block of West Hickory Street, at 6100 a.m. and to have the same removed at 6s00 p.m. on September 15, 1990. SECTION III. That the portion of the above described streets shall revert back to the City for normal traffic activity immedi- ately from and after 6100 p.m. on September 15, 1990. SECTION IV. That this resolution shall take effect and be in full Lorce and effect from and after the date of its passage and 1 approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ day of August, 1990. f I ~I 3 BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTESTt JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY S APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM* j DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY i O , ~A V St: e { PAGE 2 j I f 1 4 U a ~~'~ET CfASURE ~ y f Organization requesting street cloaucr TLC- Contact Feceon: Addcaes; lay ;/~7 rF-~ -2-j=el--~" to Be Closed: ~GG{fGl{' G~ak~ f'?'~-~ _ street Date and Time To Be closed: Intersecting streets: Reason For Closure: rtion of this tors. residents y please complete the bottom 90 the street closure H be and/or businesses attected by contacted and sign below with an indication of being in tavor or in opposition to the street closure. NAM AUTHORIZED ; r t 17 Jp 2 Fain. '-T ~ r ~1t2•ftuc~, ' u' liu ~a'• C•t~ g•~ ' 2 A0. v 296ac/9 J REQUEST FOR STREET Cfr0_ ICU organization 1leglj x tingr\ treat closure•_L!L- 1 } fY/4- ( I~ i _ 1' ` ~ C t 1►~,.L ' ~ f 'r' ~ti 1~, t Y ~ j I jv~ 1 ~ ~f Contact Pecsonc .,fit /nY'1 ~1Yf Address: /G ( /1~c ifT l'~ ~Phone :Number:- qq'1 J~ 1 Street To Be Closed: L4Cty~t~ f7(Lt, GrN~ ~fCQYI,T rl(~,(! x Date art Time To Be Closed:. tS Intstsectinq Streets: C X1v~ Reason For Closure: r 'I i j Please complete the bottom portion of this tors. residents and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST be contacted and sign below with as indication of being in favor i or in opposition to the street closure. NAME AUTHORIZED j L/OPPOSE f 3. !.(/&"k/E,h,1 a a. S ills - ' . 't 9. a ~J 10. (LCL✓ \ 29a3C/S I Z REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSUt(j, Organization requesting st at closure/1 Contact Person: s'lc'Y~ P S Address: /04 Phone Number: ~J~~•~"- ~ ~ _ Stteet To Be Closed 6 t NiM, ^ ? 4 ` cr1 Date and Time To Be Closod: - 6,2M &all ! /6 intersecting Streets: % :SQ IZLI 1 Reason For Closure: j Please complete the bottom portion of this form. Melt residents s and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST be 3 contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure. NAME AUTHORIZED I OF BUSINESS SIGNATURE YAVOE/OPPOSE 4 1. yo 7/101M AS A v i 3. A J"2 It le.-At441( AY 66 Irl ./7.~~~•LLLiii~~~rrr i ~ 6. CN G (on U 9 e- 10. n 29SIC/S ~ I i j 1 f r f i REQUEST~QR STREET CLOSURE r / 'Organization cequastinq street closure Gam:- YrcfISi e ~y r Contact Person. (7Y Address: ~G~9 pp ` Phone Number: 4 Street To Be Closed: LusT~a,~~, s~~GK©'1//`ili~~tld~e j Date and Time To Be closed; ~GXr~7. G Q 7,~~ intersecting Streets: ~g 4e- tY~ ✓Q k Reason Tor Closuce:~~1~~»'L l Pleas* complete the button portion of this foca. residents and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST be contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor I~ or in opposition to the street closure. M NAM AUTHORIZED OF BUSINESS SIORTURE FAVOR/OPPOSE ~ r so 6. 7. 10._ ~E s9eac/s i I II t , (fP`( IlIfI r i CITY COUNCIL r., f i 4 ' I h 1 I I ~1 ' ~ 2958E 4 4 i RESOLUTION NO- DIRECTORS A RES04UTIO0 APPOINTING T08 8ARPOOL TO TH DECLARINGE OF CT VE DATE,OP THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY AND EFF REAS, term of office of Roland Vela for place 1 on the of the Texas Municipal Power Agency has WHE Board RE Directors s expiredi NOW, THEREFORE, BE ?T RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON provisions Eof S t Ordinance SECTION I. Pursuant to the ol No is hereby i terms and Denton, Texas, Tom Harpo ~ -~O~ the City of office to place 1 on the Board k appointed the two year term o Powe of Directors of the Texa1990uandiendi g JulyA30,~c the term of 1992. office beginning July 31, eCEC IONat1. is .,esoluti n isal becoed,effective from and i aft passage, and it so order~ ~ PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of August, 1990, l BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ' ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS► CITY SECRETARY J AP'?ROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: OVITCN► CITY ATTORNEY DEBRA ADAMI DRAY BY: 1 I 1 I q t &V~ i i i i t 7C. or P. j s r TELEPHONE {817} 566.8290 t NroN TNXAs MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76241 / I 1 CITY OfmE f MEMORANDUM s Mayor anj Members of the City Council TD: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: 3 August 7, 1990 DATE. Corporation pond Issue Denton County Housing Finance Corpor--------------------- SU9J£CT: 1 - Tanning another y Finance Corporation is P These 1 The Denton County Housing first time homFOwners• i the incomeg However , the Program requires bond issue to as sist lower resolution to 4 bonds are not is: d by that cities with a population over 2()0L)00 agree by ate in the prograM. particle letter sent to us last information I have enclosed athat expla year your more abcut For from om the First Southwest Company this program. r {r v I L oY V, Harrell City Manager 1 I~ I r { p FIRST,60& aW,4t COMPANY INVESTMENT BANKERS j 600 FIRST CITY CENTER i 1700 PACIFIC AY[NV[ DALLAS, TEXAS 75201 13 I, 19SD-4000 February 2, 1989 t I f f f ~ Mr. Lloyd Harrell i City Manager City of Denton F ~3 2l3 E. McKinney Street .J Denton, Texas 76201 cl MAN4c.Ft{' ' Dear Lloyd: - - As you may be aware, the Denton County Housing Finance Corporation plans to have a single-family housing bond Issue in 1989. The Corporation has been advised they have received a state allocation that will permit an Issue of approximately $16,000,000. There has been demonstrated a high Interest In the program by lenders and builders In the Denton County and the allocation has been oversubscribed. The program Is designed to assist potential homeowners In the lower Income brackets and is limited to first time homeowners. We expect the mortgage rate to be in the 8.3% to 9.73% range which we feel would be very beneficial to the citizens of your City. One of the requirements of the program is that cities with a population In f excess of 20,000 must agree by council action to participate in the program. In this 1 regard, we are enclosing resolutions for your Council's action If you wish to I actlelpate. Since we must close the bond sale within 60 days of the allocation (February 1) we request that consideration be given the resolution at the earliest ' convenience of the Council. If you have any questions regarding the program or the resolution, please call I me. If the Council does approve the resolution, please return the executed documents to me as soon as possible. i Yer my yo rs, Frank J. Medanlchr . FJMscm f Enclosure { f 1 l i t A RESOLUTION r BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY G', DENTON, TEXAS, A:ISIGNING A PORTION OF ITS AUTHORITY TO ISSUE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING BONDS TO T_ DENCON COUNTY, TEXAS }iAREWITHSOLVING OTHER MATTERS I CT WHEREAS, Texas Revised Civil Statutes article 5190.9x, as amended, and the rules promulgated thereunder as 10 Texas Administrative code sections 165.1 to 167.1 (collectively, the "Act"), provide the method for the Denton County Housing Finance Corporation (the "Corporation"), a housing finance corporation created under the Housing Finance Corporations Act, as amended, Texas Local Government Code chapter 394, to seek an allocation from the Texas Department of commerce to issue private activity bonds; WHEREAS, the Corporation operates on behalf of Denton County, Texas (the "County"); WHEREAS, on July 12, 1990, the Board of Directors of ' the Corporation authorized submission of a Qualified + Application to the Texas Department of Commerce seeking the allocation for 1990 in accordance with the provisions Act; I WHEREAS, the Act provides that if two overlapping I 4 , local governmental units have each created housing finance corporations wi.h authority to issue Qualified Mortgage Bonds, 1 then unless the smaller local governmental unit assigns its authority to issue Qualified Mortgage Bonds, based upon its population, to the larger local governmental unit, t he farger local governmental unit must exclude the pop any smaller governmental unit if such smaller unit has a population as determined in the most recent federal census of 20,000 or more in determining the larger unit's allocation; WHEREAS, each of the City of Denton (the "City") and j the County have previously created a housing finance , corporation authorized to issue Qualified Mortgage Bonds; WHEREAS, the Application for Reservation for Private I 1990 (the "Application") Activity Bonds Calendar Year promulgated by the Texas Department of Commerce requires that of this resolution with its r the Corporation forward a copy Application; and I I -1- F i i I Rars mew f , Z / E h WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determines that an assignment to the County of the City's authority to j issue Qualified Mortgage Bonds for 1990, based upon the City's population located within the County, is in the best interest r of the citizens of the City; j NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON THAT: SECTION 1: The City, pursuant to the provisions of section 1(8) of the Act, hereby assigns its authority to issue i` Qualified Mortgage Bonds, based on its population within the County, to thi County. SECTION 2: The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are M i hereby made a part of this resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. SECTION 3: It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at f such meeting, including this resolution, was given, all as required by Texas Revised Civil Statutes article 6252-17, as amended. 1 SECTION 4: Capitalized terms used, but not defined, } in this Resolution shall have the meanings assigned them in the { Act. SECTION 5: This resolution shall be effective from and after the date of its passage. i PASSED AND ADOPTED by an affirmative vote of 1 members of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, this j i Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk (CITY SEAL) -2- lr Jt ~ 6 ~ fl' 2 ~R+?e ' f, { -1 JA -L-L 7 S i l 1 i i { i i a : kE i 1 0 M ~f i / August 070 1990 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM i TO. MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL i' FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager I RE: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, EXPRESSING ITS INTENT TO CONTRACT TO PURCHASE FROM THE UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT A PORTION OF THE RAW WATER OBTAINED FROM THE SULPHUR RIVER BASIN BY THE DISTRICT BY CONTRACT WITH THE CITY OF COMMERCE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. I RECOMMENDATION: i ~ The Staff recommends approval of a resolution regarding Upper Trinity Regional Water District (UTRWD) purchase of Sulphur River Basin water from the City of Commerce. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: 1 i On April 24, 1990, the Public Utilities Board reviewed the M subject resolution and recommended its approoil to the City Council. Recent information from the UTRWD indicated that the cost to Denton during the 1991 budget year will most likely be greater than the 33`i of the ;63,241 Corps of k Engineers debt service fee that the Staff had been aware of at the April 24th meeting. Because of this fact, the Staff would like to again review this resolution with the Board. Recent information from the UTRWD Indicates that the estimated UTRWD budget for Cooper Reservoir Water Project will be $250,000 having the following cost components: o Payment to the City of Commerce for their Legal Fees j etc., for the past several years $ 500000 0 Legal and regulatory fees to get water transferred from Commerce to UTRWD i 50,000 0 Payment to the Corps of Engineers for debt service on reservoir (see page 2, paragraph 7 of attached contract) $ 63,241 0 Engineering study to determine most feasible method of transporting water from Sulphur River Basin to Trinity River Basin ¢ 86,759 Total 1991 Estimate Budget $250,000 1 u i, 1 3! 1 i .n Page 2 Sulphur River Basin Denton's Share $ 83,500 33% of Estimated 1991 Budget of $250,000 With this proposed UTRWD budget, and if Denton commits to 33% of this amount, Denton's share will be $83,500 for 1991. Our 1991 operating budget had included $401000 for this project. We would have to re-allocate some bond fund water plant engineering funds to provide the remaining $43,500 if, indeed, the costs become $83,500. There are uncertainties about the political and regulatory feasibility of securing this water for Denton and the Denton County area. However, similar uncertainties and difficult political and regulatory issues will be encountered with any future water supply that Denton and Denton County attempt to secure since any future water will have to come from reuse of our wastewater or be transferred from some other river basin into the Upper Trinity River Basin. Because of the timeliness of this potential water supply and apparent regional and statewide support with the Cooper Reservoir water, the Staff continues to recommend approval of this resolution. PROGRAMS, GROUPS OR DEPARTMENTS AFFECTED: Denton Municipal Utilities, City of Denton, Water Customers, Upper Trinity Regional Water District, Legal Department, City Council, end the City of Commerce. FISCAL IMPACT: Estimated 1991 Budget $ 83,500 project (33% of $250,000 UTRWD Budget) Respect ly submitted, 4 re onager L 0 Prepared/Ap ro d by: R. ENelson, Executive Director Department of Utilities Exhibit I Resolution II PUB Minutes of April 24, 1990 CCAGEN.807 r 0 00 f r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, EXPRESSING ITS INTENT TO CONTRACT TO PURCHASE FROM THE UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT A PORTION OF THE. RAW WATER OBTAINED FROM THE SULPHUR RIVER BASIN BY THE DISTRICT BY CONTRACT WITH THE CITY OF COMMERCE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Commerce has rights to approximately 11.72 wate SulphuriRiver,gwhichsiseexcess to itsrcurrentpneedsSe ndir on the WHEREAS, the City of Commerce approached the Upper Trinity Regional Water District regarding County; and rest in purchasing the Denton excess water for use in WHEREAS, the Water Master Plan for Denton County identifies the Sulphur River Basin as a probable future source of water for Denton County; and WHEREAS, the District has determined that the cost of water in Cooper Reservoir is very favorable, compared to alternate sources; and { ity wawith ter the Cthe WHEREAS, the District is negotiating a contract purchase of by of Commerce which provides for the District for up to one hundred years; and WHEREAS, the terms of the Contract require the District cost to reimburse the City of Commerce for its cost and to pay the of obtaining regulatory approval to authorize the interbaein transfer ' of the eater to Denton County; and WHEREAS, the only source of funds to the District to fulfill its financial obligations under the contract is from contracts wit with member entities to purchase the water and guarantee payment; WHEREAS, the District proposes to apportion some of the water THEREFORE ovide interim to certain iplementnthe the contract; o NOW, that financing to ~ BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTONt That the City of Denton hereby expresses its , sFCTI02i I• attempting support to the Upper Trinity Regional Water District ofthe to assure an adequate and reliable water supply P 8 SECTION II. That the City Council of Denton indicates its intention to enter into a contract with the District to purchase and guarantee payment for at least two (2) million gallons per day of the raw water to be obtained under the proposed contract between the District and the city of commerce. n, SECTION III. That under the contract with the District, the city of Denton, along with other entities and in return for the senior right to obtain a portion of the raw water the District purchases from the City of Commerce, intends to provide to the District a pro rata share of the interim financing necessary for the District to implement the contract with the City of Commerce. Interim financing is intended to be provided for about three years, which is the estimated time necessary for obtaining regulatory authority of the interbasin transfer and to prepare an engineering report regarding alternatives for transporting the water. It is expected that the interim financing provided by the City of Denton will be assumed and repaid by all the entities who participate in the District, on a pro rata basis. ,SECTION IV. That this Resolution shall become effective j immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1990. i BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY s i ► y'1N`1 Comm ores PAGE 2 ~ r. EXHIBIT.~ EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES April 24, 1990 11. CONSIDER RESOLUTION REGARDING RAW WATER SUPPLY FROM COOPER RESERVOIR AND ASSOCIATED CONTRACT. Nelson reviewed this item explaining that the Upper Trinity Regional Water District (UTRWD) is not yet in a position to assume the upfront costs of this project. The city would take one-third, Lewisville takes one-third and Highland I'h Village and Denton County Fresh water District N1 takes one-third of this water supply. With this contract, Denton guarantees that cost plus legal costs until UTRWD can take over the funding. J Chairman LaPorte asked why the City of Commerce is selling ~I their water. Nelson explained that Commerce signed a 100 year lease on rights to Lake Tawakoni and built a pipeline and intake structure. This water is less expensive for them than what is offered here. North Texas Municipal Water District turned down "interim" waters the City of Commerce 1 1 then came to the UTRWD. r Motion 1 Frady made a motion to recommend to the City Council subject resolution and associated contract. Second by Chew. Discussion Laney stated he had reviewed the map showin alternative routes. He asked if the Board has not already discussed some kind of an agreement with Irving. Nelson stated that there are several alternatives to be considered. Laney asked if Denton could tranport water by oversising the j pipeline in Irving. Nelson stated that we would like to do this, but we don't have firm agreements from Irving. Nelson also explained that interbasin transfers must have a permit J from the Texas Water Commission. Signing this contract will give Denton 2 MO of the 11.7 MO. Denton is front ending 33% of the total cost for the one or two years of this joint project. Thompson expressed that he is pleased the utility is lookin g to the future water supply requirements for the City of Denton. 10 Vote V ~ Chairman LaPorte called for the vote. All ayes, no nays, motion carried. ~I y a d r s - i i i rrry I i i E I j :r R DATE: August 7, 1990 s CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT t TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council S i FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Consider approval of a resolution approving a contract to 1 provide solid waste collection services to the University of North Texas. i i RECC14EMDATICN: The Public Utility Board unanimously recommended approval at their meeting on August 2, 1990. SLK"Y: The Initial term of this agreement is from September 1, 1990, through August 31, 1991. Thereafter, LINT shall have the option to extend the contract for three (3) additional one-year terms. The bid specifications and the agreement i specify that in the event the City of Denton declares a { ( proprietary commerclal solid waste disposal contractor for the } h city and that LINT Is required to comply, the contract derived from this bid may be cancelled at the earliest possible time f without penalty. BACKGROUND: The University of North Texas decided to rebid the contract for solid waste service. The city serviced this account up until 2 years ago when a private hauler was awarded the bid. The Solid Waste Division will serve the account with an u existing vehicle. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Solid Waste Division and the University of North Texas FISCAL IMPACT: The City of Denton Solid Waste Division base bid was i I $11,614.72 per month. The basis for the bid was what the charges would be for a similar customer with the same amount of refuse with the comerclal rate adjustment for FY 1990-91. It is estimated that the account will generate approximately 15,000 cubic yards per year. I J la T }yr Ja'.I• P } City Council Report Format Page 2 tl Acquisition of the account will require the addition of one employee who will act as a spotter and flagman for the driver and to collect any spillage when a dtmvster is serviced. AnnuaI revenue from the contract Is $139,376.67. The estimated cost of providlnq the service Is as follows: Personnel Servl es $ 22,972 Overtime 40000 Operating 6 Maintenance 180000 Disposal TOTAL S 89,972 i ' I ; Respectfully submitted, j ; i Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: i i E rles S. Wa kins Superintendent + Solid Waste Division Approved by. j ~ Bi e o Director of Communlty Servic.s II J i ~r r7l ) r., August 07, 1990 r T CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager RE: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRAC'T' TO PROVIDE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES To THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS (UNT). ,a,,0 RECOMMENDATION! The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of August 2, 199f, recommended to the City Council approval of subject rerolution, SUIYARY/BACKGROUND: The initial term of this agreement is from September 1, 1990, through August 31, 1991. Thereafter, UNT shall have the option to extend the contract for three (3) additional one-year terms. The bid specifications and the agreement specify that in the event the City of Denton declares a proprietary commercial solid waste disposal contractor for the City, and that UNT is required to comply, the contract derived from this bid may be cancelled at the earliest possible time without penalty. The City of Denton Solid Waste Division base bid was $11,614.72 per month. The basis for the bid was what the charges would be for a similar customer with the same amount of refuse with the commerclal rate adjustment for FY 1990-91. It is estimated that the account will generate approximately 15,000 cubic yards per year. ,S Acquisition of the account will requiro the addition of one employee who will act as a spotter and flagman for the I driver and to collect any spillage when a dumpster is serviced. I 1 1 6 fr1si{c I Page 2 Solid Waste Collection Annual revenue from the contract is $139,376.67. The estimated cost of providing the service is as follows: Personnel Services $22,972 Overtime 41000 I Operating 6 Maintenance 18,000 Disposal 45,OOD TOTAL ;89,972 .octfully bmittod, ,I R ep j E. Nelson, Executive Executive ' Director of Utilities Prepared by, j +I Bill Angelo, Director of Community Services Approved by, R. E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities j Exhibit 1 Resolution II Proposed Agreement bbtween City of Denton and UNT III Bid Specifications IV City of Denton Exceptions and References V Municipal Solid Waste Storage - Subchapter B VI PUB Minutes of August 21 1990 CCAGEN.807 i 1 i i 17 1 ffi 1 EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES August 21 1990 1. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRACT TO PROVIDE SOLID WASTE COLLECTIUN_SERVICES TO TH£ UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS. Nelson asked the approval of the Board to address the emergency agenda regarding the approval of the solid waste d collection services provided to the University of North Texas by the City prior to addressing the regular agenda items. LaForte moved; Frady seconded; approved unanimously. Chairman Thompson asked Bill Angelo to present the item. Bill informed the Board that for the past 2-3 weeks, the City has been collecting the major portion of NT's solid waste. Two years ago, the City had bid for the service, however, BFI Industries was the low bidder and the contract was awarded accordingly. The City bid again this year, and BFI Industries was the low bidder again; however, UNT wishes to award the contract to the City due to the better service ; provided. The costs involved to the City would be to hire one additional person; we already have the vehicle for collection purposes; there would be fuel charges and some overtime. Approximate cost to the City is ;85,000, and our bid was $139,000. Thompson asked if our liability insurance will go up being E on the campus. Angelo answered no. Laney asked if there would be any capital outlay. Angelo answered no. Thompson queried as to what effect this additional waste would have on our landfill shortage. Angelo estimated this would be an additional 15,000 cubic yards, and would shorten our landfill life by approximately two weeks. Thompson asked for any further discussion. Motion called, all ayes, no nays, motion carried. PUBMINS.802 P Vol y x a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS FOR SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREASF the City of Denton owns a solid waste disposal services and WHEREAS, the University of North Texas and the City of Denton are desirous of entering into an agreement for solid waste dis- posal service; NOW, THEREFORE, I THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: ~ SECTION I. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to { i execute an agreement on behalf of the City for solid waste disposal service between the City of Denton and the University of North Texas, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated j herein by reference. ' i SECTION Ii. That this Resolution shall be effective immedi- ately upo~ts passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1990. f BOB CA LE8 RRY, MAYOR ATTEST: r JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY i BY: r APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: hm A, 11~, I1 j I P 1 1082L Y AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS WHEREAS, the University of North Texas (hereinafter referred to as 'UNT') has advertised for bids for solid waste disposal service and the City of Denton (hereinafter referred to as 'City') having submitted a bid for such servicesi and WHEREAS, UNT having accepted such bid and the parties are desirous of entering into an agreement for solid waste disposal services NOW, THEREFORE, WITNESSETH: 1. SCOPE City shall provide UNT with solid waste disposal services in accordance with the conditions and provisions outlined in Exhibit I "A', attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if the same were set forth in its entirety herein, except that UNT agrees that City need not provide the insurance coverage as specified on page two of the bid specifications contained in Exhibit 'A'. II. PAYMENT UNT agrees to pay City in accordance with the rates as set forth in said Exhibit 'A'. 1 III. CANCELLATION j This contract may be cancelled by either party by giving i written notice to the other party not less than sixty (60) days I prior to the date of termination. IV. SERVICES A. Both parties agree that this agreement is subject to the j provisions of Chapter 325, Subchapter B of the Regulations promulgated by the Texas Department of Health, as the same exist now and as may be amended from time to time here- after. B. Both parties agree that the section addressing 'Required Service' is hereby qualified by the following paragraphs: 1. Authorized waste stored in conformance with applicable state and local regulations within a ten-foot radius of a regularly serviced container, will be removed by the City, provided the number . i r • of times such overage is placed for disposal r within said radius does not exceed twenty percent (201) of the total number of services provided to that collection point during any calendar month. If such placement exceeds twenty percent (201), the City will notify UNT of the need for increased container capacity or service frequency at said collection point, and the parties agree that the City shall amend the collection schedule and { monthly fees accordingly. UNT may refuse such adjustment when initially notified by City, but shall not thereafter require city to collect waste not d_positca in dumpsters at the collection point in question. 2. Should dumpsters be overloaded so as to make them unserviceable, additional charges may be made to UNT for costs incurred by the City in its efforts I to restore the serviceability of the containers in i question. For example, the removal and disposal of large quantities of construction material (e.g., rock, iron, concrete, soil) or wetted garbage may require the application of additional equipment and personnel, the cost of which shall be billed i to UNT. ! 3 C. This agreement does not encompass the collection or disposal of special wastes or hazardous wastes and U11T agrees not to I place such i IV. TERM The initial term of this agreement shall commence September 1, 1990 and continue through August 31, 1991. Thereafter, UNT shall have the option to extend the contract for three (3) additional one-year terms. Executed this the day of , 1990. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS BY: BYt trffU . HARRELL CITY MANAGER 1 PACE 2 1 i Y I t I i I ATTEST: ATTEST., s JENNIFER WALTERSt CITY SECRETARY BY: SECRETARY I i APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM! DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCfI CITY ATTORNEY ATTORNEY FOR UNT ~ I t BY: ~ j j 1 f I I j I 1 PAGE 3 i 1 ell- P 0 I R Y ~M1 Exhibit "A" INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS: The back side of the "Invitation to Bid" (Form 303-02-REV) Damon. Tame cites rules and regulations governing bids issued by the 76203 University of North Texas. These rules are applicable Fhve;oal for all goads and or services procured by sealed bid Flom process and paid for by State funding. Though all of the regulations are pertinent please make special note of sections: 1.1, 1.20 1.60 1.70 2.1 a ! 4.1. Should a problem occur with a bid it will usually be covered by one or more of these sections. Regarding Section 1.6 ("Texas Vendor Identification Number"), the Comptroller of Public Accounts requires this number on all invoices to be paid with state funds. No payment from state funding can be made to a vendor with out a vendorI.D. number. In contractual situations this number must " existing prior to the beginning of any work to be apid by state funds. i t Assistance in securing the Vendor I.D. Number may be { obtained by phone at the Comptroller of Public Accounts ' office area code 512-475-2707 or toll free from anywhere in Texas at 1-800-252-5555. I The Texas Application form for Vendor identification number may be obtained through: Bob Bullock Comptroller of Public Accounts Revenue Processing Division 111 East 17th Austin, Texas 78711 Attns Vendor File Section Thank You, James Keifer Physical Plant Purchasing Supervisor 7101 M Irma• Iea lll]f,v.f. Atfiee"ACM.41401 1 u ra(! f!I• W .VfM~ ,1 I II 1 MKI INWTArtoh fo ero AaTYRN 3W.iD * ~v.. a' ewe TO 1 hiwmity of + o u1 1C;.O.S +e, 1.06 ee.InvMT. SAN" 11001M MWT34M agLOw ~iIVERSTY *a wvo es Dow% Tams Erma OUOTI P.O.& 0L#MMATION I OF NORTH TE.YAS Controllers Office IDOOPSM43loK July 26, 1990 P10. Box 13767 N.T. Station aro MsourvnOM wwsi As0We11"Pa - Denton, Texas 76203 IN Loom uvf KANO SIG • DCORMS IVE-OR or soot as of.. a.a. ~a[rKS yeDVws +oar µ0 lnOri'•Oi' ry 1~I 11wL1l1 YL ~ CR 1S r p MIOW Ww" 6w"M OR Mr S>;~ IM rrs w QO5 J Ou w Man y0y~ f •VOfrOwt r ~ Ow 40" bA vlw00A o Pdu~ UNIVE.'tSITY OF NORTH MUS ~oosAwASSSfe iCe yS%6AVd7 Central Receiving Warehouse ~af;ai WLow ~I City of Denton 2310 North 135 E WM81 in 215 E. McKinney SIG. Denton, Texas 76201 Denton, Texas 76201 P11 • wo. s... o.,• rrwwr UW WW You are invited to furnish the University of North Texas, Dentcn,Texas with a bid for the job shown below, according to the attached documents. Sealed bids will be received until 3000 P.M. o'clock on the bid opening date shown above. Bids may be mailed to Physical Plant Director, P.O. Box 13527 N.T. Station, Oenton, Texas 76203, or brought to the Physical plant office at 2204 West Prairie Street. Mark job titl on outside of bid envelope. All bid ' envelopes will be opened and read aloud 4t the above time and date. Bids received after bid opening will not be considered. The University of North Texas reserves the right to reject any itiesl InspictiontOfwsite may be made b r calling -person shown below at 2751. For Site inspection, contact0 Budd Pair ob Titlei solid waste Service me b"W 'Y ~11111"1 "411,11,04111 N' ON MFIr UY~A~ ft Am1~/ N YrIV qI Al 0Mll ""We"d 110114,110 1111 on" swim M tiM 1w. MMN N Sawa it OR • of ~&wsms aru aftwosimiI WCow "Womm W M" pe.+ Mrrr `f ~MII O OA„ r"r••+wMl rrN v w.rrwr M w r ,A► ~rrr n., •.r Rr~ wrr w ur ~w •I rr r W4 G1ak OMCUhT OAVs 1 r 1! I 9 S P p SCOPE: The University of North Texas desires to enter into the contract with the company offering the moat advantageous proposition to the University. This contract will be effective from September 1, 1990 through August 31, 1991 with an option to extend for 3 (three) additional years, subject to one year intervals. Prices are maximum and the University shall be protected against any increase in price during the term of the contract except as noted elsewhere. If there is a reduction in the price during the term of the contract the price to the University shall be reduced in the amount and manner as the greatest reduction in price granted to any political subdivision or segment of the trade. OPTION: It is agreed that the University of North Texas shall have the option to extend the contract 3 (three) additional years subject to one year intervals. Notice shall be served at least 60 days prior to termination at which time the successful contractor shall agree or disagree to the extension within 30 days. ESCALATION CLAUSE: 61,ould market conditions prevail which dictate an increase the successful contractor may submit documentation reques{ing permission to increase pricing 30 days before such extension becomes effective. Escalation may only occur at the time of renewal and ONLY upon supplying documented manufacturer's invoicing or other relevant data which reflects the increase and securing the approval of the purchasing department in writing. The term of the contract or the continuation of the contract, if continued, is contingent upon the availability of funds. Should funds be unavailable or not appropriated by the legislature of the State of Texas, the contract is subject to cancellation. The option is maintained to reinstate and continue the contract should funds become available within a reasonable length of time. Should funds not be appropriated, neither the University nor any of it's agents shall be liable for discharging such obligations, CANCELLATION: This contract may be canceled by the University of North Texas for any reason after giving 60 days written notice to the contractor. ` NONASSIONABLE CONTRACT! This contract is between the University r[ of North Texas and selected contractor. The service provided in this agreement shall not be further assigned to another agency except by expressed permission by the University of North Texas. SAFETY: In performance of the service the contractor shall protect the work, adJacent property, and persons in a manner satisfactory to the University. Special attention shall be given to the observation of all safety precautions so that the work will not damage or endanger students, employees, II ! property, or the gen.!,sl public. 4 : The contractor shall be responsible for any damage or injury due f to any act of neglect attributable to persons working under his P direction. The contractor shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and orders of any public authority having jurisdiction for the safety of persona or property to protect r them from damage, injury or loss. In any emergency affecting the safety of rersoz,a or property, the Contractor shall act, at, his discretion, to prevent threatened 1 damage, injury or loss. As a safety precaution, the vehicle(s) used by the contractor shall have two operators at all times, with one persor. acting as flagman at the rear of the vehicles(s) to warn pedestrians of its movement. This person shall wear appropriate safety clothing and carry a warning flag during the time the vehicles(s) are making pickups. There will be no movement of vehicles in the intercampus area during class changes. CONDITIONS AT SITE OR BUILDING: The Contractor is responsible for having visited the site and having ascertained pertinent local conditions such as location, accessibility, and general character of the site or building, the character and extent of existing work within and adjacent to the site, and other work being performed thereon at the time of the submission of his proposal. Any failure to do so will not relieve him from responsibility for successfully performing the work without additional expense to the owner. J REFERENCES: Contractor should provide with the bid not less than three references of similar service locations. INSURANCE: The Contractor shall not commence work under this contract until he has obtained all the insurance required here under and certificates of such insurance have been filed with and approved by the Owner. Approval of the insurance by the Owner shall not relieve or decrease the liability of the Contractor. The Contractor shall provide and maintain, until the Work covered in this Contract is completed and accepted by the Owner, the minimum insurance coverages as follow: Type of Coverage Limits of Liability 1. Worker's Compensation Statutory 2. Employer's Liability 9100,000 9300,000 each occurrence aggregate 1 2 t FF ~ s 3. Comprehensive General Liability a, Bodily Injury $500,000 each occurrence b. Property Damage $100,000 $300,000 each occurrence aggregate 4. Comprehensive Automobile Liability a. Bodily Injury $300,000 $500,000 each person each occurrence b. Property Damage $300,000 each occurrence 5. Umbrella Liability (Excess) $1,000,000 each occurrence BONDING: Contractors other than municipalities, upon written J~J notification of intent to award. shall provide the University I with a performance Bond equal to the amount of the Annual contractual period. Said bonding document shall be provided to the University within 10 calendar days of receipt of 3 written notification of intent to award or the bid may be declared void. No purchase order for the service to begin will be issued until the bonding document is furnished to UNT. PAYMENT: The University will furnish the successful biader with ` the appropriate billing inform4tion. Payment will be made monthly through standard University procedures. Payment for completed work will be approved upon presentation of an invoice outlining all services performed during the previous billing period. Invoices must be presented and must reference the UNT purchase order number. REQUIRED SERVICE: All refuse shall be removed from the containers in the schedule provided herein. No refuse shall be allowed to remain in the containers after each emptying. Containers shall be left in bn orderly manner at the designated locations. Pickup is to include all boxes, carpet, crates, eta., unerated debris, including all wet and dry garbage, within a 10 foot j radius of the container. If the refuse truck leaks hydraulic, transmission, oil or coolant fluids on our drives the vendor shall clean up the drives as the leaks occur. t. Driver of trash pickup vehioles(s) shall be responsible to pickup trash that falls out of container during unloading operation. If the refuse truck leaks hydraulic, transmission, oil or coolant fluids on our drives the vendor shall clean up the drives as the leaks occur. 3 I II ti pW.; x v { EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS: All collection vehicles shall be of such a design as to eliminate the possibility of having trash blown from the bed, while traveling from one location to the next, and trips made to the landfill. Contractor shall demonstrate adequate backup capability to maintain the required schedule !or the life of this contract. The University dumpster locations are currently set up for a front loading trash truck. Some areas may not accommodate a side loading truck because of space limitations and or practicality. It shall be the contractors responsibility to make the pickups where the dumpsters are currently. qYa UNIVERSITY-FURNISHED PROPERTY: Dumpsters will be furnished under this contract. The dumpsters are designed for a front loading fork. PERSONNEL AND WORKMANSHIP: The Contractor will be required to furnish all qualified personnel and adequately supervise their activities while performing this contract. The contractor shall provide a full service representative to resolve any and all problems which may appear during the course of this contract. MOBILE CONTAINERS: One or more cans at the following locations are on casters and require manual relocation to empty then be returned to their original positions; McConnell Hall, Kerr Hail, Health Center, Coliseum and Administration Building. CHECK-IN: The operator of the refuse truck shall check in with the UNT Grounds department each weekday morning before leaving campus in the event call-ins on missed or overloaded containers have already been reported. i SIZE OF WORKFORCE: Vendor shall be able to demonstrate the ability to service an account of our magnitude and have adequate backup trucks. ROUTE SUPERVISOR: The vendor receiving the award of this contract shall assign a route supervisor to manage the route. This supervisor is to run the route at startup with the normally assigned driver long enough to "KNOW" the route and then periodically as a refresher. This supervisor is to then accompany any new or substitute driver until the new driver knows the route or the regular driver returns. (The objective here is to not have a new or substitute driver sent here that doesn't know where the refuse cans are or what the route is.) SPECIAL PICKUPS: At least 4 times per year dormitory residents are required to empty out their dwellings. These times occur at Christmas, Thanksgiving, the week before Spring Break and the end of the Spring Semester which occurs about the second week of each May, 4 j During these times the University will probably sat extra cans at the dormitories and also request additional pickup frequencies. The amount of refuse generated during these time frames is enormous and the solid waste contractor is to be flexible enough to accommodate our needs. The objective is to keep trash from being piled around the refuse containers because the container is full. Prior to Thanksgiving, Christmas, Spring Break and the end of the Spring Semester the duration is normally five days each. Should the contractor need to provide a second trash pickup vehicle during these periods to keep trash from being stacked by the cans, it shall be the contractors responsibility to do so at no additional charge. The extra refuse picked up is billable at the add-on deletion rate. (During the 3 long shut down periods the last 2 days are the worst and would probably require one additional truck to keep up, however, if one truck can keep up then only one truck is required.) During the last 3 days of the major shut downs the contractor shall have the route supervisor on campus. During the shut down periods the University will request a specific number of extra pickups at the dormitories as scheduling guide for the contractor but will expect as many pickups as required to control the situation so that trash will not be stacked beside a f full can. UNFORSEEABLE INCREASES: U.S., State, County and City taxes or I surcharges, to which state agencies are subject may be passed I through by the contractor upon approval of the University of North Texas and the State Purchasing and General Services f Commission. I (Current known and approved charges in this category are an 8% franchise fee imposed by the City of Denton on private J contractors and the Texas Department of Health fees of 50 cents per ton or 17 cents per compacted cubic yard or 10 cents per uncompacted cubic yard as per State of Texas Senate Bill 1519. Governmental fees applicable to this agency will be identified and shown on each invoice as a separate line item as indicated under the "Billing Format" paragraph.) (Normal landfill increases are not included in this category).(Normal landfill charges other than Texas Department of Health fees are to be included in the base bid) EXTERNALLY FORCED CANCELLATION: Should the City of Denton declare a proprietary commercial solid waste disposal contractor for the City and this agency is required to comply the contract derived from this bid may be canceled at the earliest possible time without penalty, 5 _ WT NIN, t ~ .~a..i~=i .l:'c3 : ,3..'YY~Z ~V:.: .S:l~~ .V .Vr•TYV,! Yrf~, .3.=e } Sd[-~. } ~~g7'f~Z.i ~:1~,1.~ \C: s:: ► ~`f.,!?aTl?: ~'„1~Z ~.R ~ _~zj:z.a.,r :a.~k.:.z`::a i *ati :~`y :etc Zl,a ~•,e,iCs;za~ _t:-_.~ ~`E_i:lL° :2.a: ~~IIQ tom. :2:'t.'.?1i .~csf•!. S:lrY• ~c.}.3. ~ a~ ems~?s eat :'M~zwa~~r~ 1Y~ 1 a =aai z rV:a:--1z :fie ~as:.,i try s~i3 :~i►1~f.`Jt Y1.•~~ a4 {I fe== =a zl eb2 Yil :viz* -,*7 `ar lrliz3K*v tl 4~` A`mia; tz~i :fit .:'a.r pi.lt~r v~!!»ld.~t ll:4c iRll a-fte-SL>1Z, Yl:~t ~S~w~IZ' r_r_a:.ra fry :Nis ~'+et`_;e is all;~c?~;! t.~~~st aLsrix3 ~`tv♦ dv`ttq zerizs rat.7a ri:3a era rti irY.t, !~tiare t.~ .~~ieplr. w~1h =Lis ~'=i:e_ le Vi:. ':e :a---se 2.` :a~~l t4 ~~1ttCa~t ax~t CtJ~\at4, t..a: !-!•-Szse zf tie ~:LVte System %NN~a:i,--Nallr iz the t"etes. "s are i l~xtl t to !x.•.h side t.~ 32Sc~~:+je t.~13ae coat t'~: i.`AS a23 th! .`4`lrat\`r shall Att\.4to V =":3t^?z:iC2s at ea' Pickup s':- 01-At tAt V3':'k\LVk is cperatcr s.'.all a::if;r the de!tk `lerk .`f air htih to react sr that it cal t-e .•a inside the tv\ildint i,r %Li•rer<_ity explcyt`es prier to the noit rickefr. It the pick+:p does rat eaptr each side t'ho :+hall \41~V1.t anA dip the cans as reauire3 t,:~ ciaanzut the tvsta,a and war k%bargs for the reload per the add-on schedule, UNT APARTMENM AND EAGLE ARM, Those Z crass ai`e basi\`ally apartoents will full time residents that will neel ptehur sore Ws per the schedule 52 weeks rer year, BILLING FORMAT: Invoicing is to be monthly, Each invoice shall show as separate line itous, in Pixy ortlert (1) Use contract (2)extra pickups by location and at&$% (1) E City, State, Federal taxes, surcharges, levies, 0o, (4) fredkka from elosinas(S) total aaount due. Eaoh invoice shall rstaronvo the University Purchase order number on lt, a} , i Sample Invoice format: 1. Base Contract September, 1990 fKKKKK,KK 2. Extra pickups 9/7/90 Physical Plnnt 1 X 6 yd, Q 1,30 yd, YIN 2 X 4 yd. 0 1.30 yd. 10,40 F 9/8/90 Physical Plant 2 X 6 yd, • 1.30 yd, 15,00 , I 3. Governmental charges a. City of Denton franchise fees(8% X $???,00) KKXK,Kx b. Texas Dept. of Health landfill fees KKKK,YK 4. Credits -KNKK,xK 5. Total Due XXXX,XX E a , © 1 i lr /1~ 1 I } MTiJ~ I`r 9 1F■■ 1 l } r r CALLBACKS: If one or more refuse containers is missed the contractor shall pickup the missed location within 2 hours of verbal notification at no additional cost to the University. RADIO CONTACT: The contractors refuse trucks shall have 2-way radios in them that will receive calls from the contractors base ` station and permit acknowledgment of the call while on campus. I AVAILABILITY OF EXTRA SERVICE: Should overloading of a refuse container occur after it has been picked up on its normal route the University may call in a request for additional pickup. This extra pickup shall be performed within 2 hours after verbal notification and will be billable as shown in the add-on/deletion portion of the bid.(ie: An extra pickup on a 6 yard can bid at $1.22 per yard would be billable at $7.32) DIFFERENT SERVICES: The University reserves the right to purchase related but different services elsewhere.(i.e.Temporary 30 yard roll off service, compactors, etc.) WORK HOURS: Hours of pickup shall be approved by the University of North Texas. DUMPING AREAS: The Contractor shall be solely responsible for depositing the waste material in an approved city, county or private sanitary landfill. All landfill fees or costs are the responsibility of the Contractor. HOLIDAYS: The University observes unusual holidays. These holidays include a couple of days at Thanksgiving, 7-14 days at Christmas, and approximately 5 days in March for Spring Break. These holidays float and are approved on an annual basis and therefore cannot be specified in this bid. The University frequently does not observe national holidays such as Memorial Day, Fourth of July, etc. but would expect the successful bidder to make pickups on each day that the University is open. For holiday periods that the University does observe for which no pickups are required billing shall be reduced on a per day basis based on the per cubic yard add-on/deletion rate average. PARTIAL CLOSING: During summer months some of our dormitories and cafeterias are closed. The quantity of each is dependent upon summer enrollment. For periods when these areas are i closed the billing shall be reduced in accordance with I pricing on the bid page in regard to add one and deletions. { NOTIFICATION OF CLOSINGS: Whether the closing is total (i.e:Holidays) or partial, the Contractor will be given a minimum of 1 week prior notice of such closings. 7 i r 1 f t t ADDITIONAL WORK OR DELETIONS: The University reserves the right to add or delete pickups by giving the Contractor 2 weeks written notification(Formal change notice). Said modification will be based on the prices bid on the bid page in regard to add ons and e deletions in relation to the cubic yard difference.(This clause is in reference to when the University acquires a new building or i buildin gandndenotesiadlong termamodification)~ervice at a NOTES TO BIDDERS: 1• The percentage you show on the bid page is a maximum annual escalation without forcing a rebid and it will be a factor in determining the award of the bid. For example if you bid $1000.00 a year with 10% escalation factor and the bid states the option to extend the contract as being for 3 years then your bid evaluation would be $4541.00 over a 4 year period for an average of $1150.25($1000.00 + $1100.00 + $1210.00 + $1331.00). Please forecast this percentage as accurately as possible. If you anticipate no increase you may note 0% escalation factor. A negative escalation entered will be considered as 0% escalation. 2. Since Holidays and closings are unpred'_etable they will not be considered in the evaluation of bids. 3. Bids must be on the forms provided and be manually signed. 4. If as a bidder taking you are E specification said exception must ebeiin writingpand submitted with the bid. If the exception you list t I the University your bid may be considered void. Questions regarding acceptable exceptions should be directed to James Ke£fer. t ' 5. The successful bidder will be required to obtain a vendor Identification number from the State Comptroller of Public Accounts if the bidders firm does not already have the J number. I 8. Current and past performance on other contracts may be considered in determining a Contractors ability to successfully execute the terms and conditions of this bid. 8 1 s 9 1 ! BID PAGE:(Base bid and option Number One) a 1. Monthly solid waste pickup service based on attached route list $-ILAL Mo.. 2. Estimated City of Denton franchise fee $---r4=- month(to be included in tabulation of bids), 3. Estimated Texas Department of Health landfill fee $-MA,month(will noE be I.noluded in tabulation of bids). Misc. A. The add-on/deletion rate irregardless of container size is $-1.27 cubic yard. B. The anticipated percent of annual escalation at the time of each renewal,(should options to extend a contract derived from this bid be exercised), is 6 X for each additional year. Option Numbor One: The additional cost for the second pickup at Kerr East and West to occur between 3:00 and 5:00 P.M. is $§9A- .58month. The undersigned by submitting a bid hereby certifies that he has visited the site and taken full account of existing conditions, )aaa carefully read the document and understands and agrees that acceptance by the University of North Texas of the bidder's proposal by issuance of a purchase order will create a binding contract. COMPANY: UL, OF DENTON SOt r❑ H cT nrorcrn~ ADDRESS: 21-s E AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: (Print Name Here:) cbsrjam c Va ina a DATE SIGNED: 7/29/90 CITY, STATE, do ZI?:_Danten. T rv■ 7izni PHONE NUMBRR: rav) s66-8 • n I The contract is in all things performable and enforcable in Denton County, Texas. In the event of any breach of this agreement by the Contractor the University shall be entitled to recover from the contractor all damages together with reasonable attorney's fee and court costs. Facsimile or telegraphic responses to this bid are not acceptable and will not be considered. i f I 9 r 1 el, MIT s~ 0er l l ROUTE LIST (*Daily means once per day, 6 days a week, Monday- Saturday) 1. Physical Plant One eight yd. dumped twice per week r 2. Physical Plant One six yd. and one four yd. dumped twice per week 3. Physical Plant One eight yd, dumped twice Per Physical Education One six yd. dumped fourtimeseweekly 5. Chilton Hail One six yd. dumped daily 6. Music Building One eight yd. dumped daily 7. Administration Building One four yd. dumped daily 8. Library One eight yd. dumped daily 10. Bruce Hall One eight yd. dumped idaily 11. Bruce Cafeteria One eight yd. dumped daily 12. Masters Hall One eight yd. dumped daily 13. Marquis Hall One six yd. dumped daily 14. Science Research Bldg. One eight yd. dumped daily 15. Industrial Technology One eight yd. dumped three times weekly 16. Power Plant Four eight yd. dumped daily 17. Art Building One eight yd. dumped daily 18. Kendall Hall one eight yd. dumped daily 19. Highland Hall One four yd. dumped daily 20. Wooten Building One six yd. dumped daily 21. Print Shop Two four yd. dumped daily 22. Service Building Two six yd. dumped daily { 23. Speech & Drama One six yd. dumped daily 3 24. Smith Hall one four yd. dumped twice per week 25. Eagle Arms Apts. One eight yd. dumped twice weekly 26. Kerr East Three two yd. dumped twice daily iJ 27. Kerr West Three two yd, dumped twice daily i 28. Kerr Cafeteria Two eight yd. dumped daily 29. Maple Hall Two six yd. dumped daily 30. Maple Cafeteria One eight yd. dumped daily { 31. Clark Hall One six yd, dumped daily 32. Clark Cafeteria One eight yd, dumped daily 33. Crumley Hall One six yd. dumped daily 34. Quads One eight yd. dumped four times per f 35. West Hall Two six yd. & one eight yd. dumpededaily 36. Advancement Center One four yd. dumped three times 37. Sullivant Center One four yd. dumped twice per week 38. Oak St. Hs11 One four yd. dumped three times p per week 39. UNT Apartments Two six yd. dumped three timespe week 40. Coliseum Two six yd. dumped twice weekl per week 41. College Inn Four four yd. & one eight yd. dumped daily 42• Mens Gym One four yd. dumped three times per week 43. Missile Base Two four yd, dumped once 44. Sycamore Hall One four per week yard McConnell Hall One four yd. andponeteightwydkldumped daily 10 j 1 Ile ~ t ` r I~ KERR HALL EAST & WEST & CAFETERIA i As an option and an alternate separate i & West and Cafeteria is requested. Thipricing for Kerr Hall East (option Number One) or stand alone(AlternateeNumber One)aservice l to this building based on the standard specifications. F Because of the fire hazard in the chute systems of Kerr East & West the most desirable pickup times are before 8:00 in the morning and between 3:00 AND 5:00 in the afternoons. The cafeteria cans are to be picked up only once per day before 8:00 ` AM as in the first daily pickup for Kerr East and West. ' 4i By submitting a bid on the option or the alternate the bidder agrees to the afternoon pickup between 3:00 ane 5:00 P.M. at Kerr East and West. Because of the potential for pricing differential de end whether or n p e upon n of th e option is awarded to the contractor being awarded the base bid or the alternate to a second contractor 2 sets of pricing is requested. 1 Should the alternate Number one be awarded a separate purchase I order will be issued and administered by the UNT Housing department and the base bid award will be reduced based on 12480 f yards(240 yda X'52 weeks) times the add-on/deletion rate listed ; In the base bid. Should Alternate Number One be awarded and the annual cost is less than $25000.01 then the bonding requirement will not apply to the award of the alternate. I BASE BID AND ALTERNATE NUMBER ONE AWARD CLARIFICATION: f ~ f Thn University's desire is to have the base bid and the option performed by one contractor. Should the lowest and beat quote on the base bid not be accompanied by a quotation for Option Number One the University reserves the right to reject the lowest and beat base bids until the lowest and best bid on the base bid and Option Number One is reached. If the base bid and Option Number One are awarded together then Option Number One will be included in the tabulation of base bids to determine the lowest and beat bid. If the bids received on Alternate Number One are deemed more advantageous by the University than the inclusion of Option Number One with the base the University may award Alternate Number one even though the lowest and beat bid on the base also submitted a bid on Option Number One. ii r~ t ~ 1 BID PAGE: For Alternate Number One(Kerr Hall) 1. Stand alone award with second daily pickup at Kerr East and West between 3:00 and 8!00 P.M.. a. Kerr East b. Kerr West - -No. e. Kerr Cafeteria $-------Mo. d. Add on/Deletion Rate Mo. cu.yd. 2. Estimated City of Denton Franchise efeedlesa of can size. $ month(To be included in tabulation of bids) 3. Estimated Texas Department of Health landfill fee bide- 9) 'month will not be included in tabulation of Thfoe antioipated percent of annual escalation for alternate Number 1 e r each renewal, (should options to extend a contract derived from this bid be exercised.), is for each additional year. --x The undersigned by submitting a bid hereby certifies that he has visited the site and taken full account of existing conditions, has carefully read the document and understands and agrees that acceptance by the University of North Texas of the bidders proposal by issuance of a purchase order will create a f ' binding contract. COMPANY:-- ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, & ZIP: PHONE NUMBER: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: j (Print Name Here:) j DATE SIGNED: j The contract is in all things performable and enforceable in Denton Coun ty, Texas. In the event of any breach of this by the Contractor the Unive shall be ed to f recovernfrom the Contractor all damagesitogether withnreasonable attorney's fee and court costa. , Facsimile or telegraphic responses to this bid are not acceptable and will not be considered. 1 12 Page 1 of 4 Pages I, CITY OF DENTON EXCEPTIONS 8 REFERENCES i EXCEPTIONS; lil THROUGH 13 c i EXCEPTION 41 (Reference page 50 section entitled "Required Service") ' Texas Department of Health Regulation Chapter 325, Subchapter B dictates procedures that may constrain activities described by the bid document, (A COPY is appended for your convenience,) Neither the City nor another vendor may agree to participate in collection activities which violate Federal, State, or local waste-handling regulations, i ~ 4 EXCEPT? Authorized waste stored In confo f removed by the City within a tenrmance radjussofhaaregularly regulations wail be ~ I provided the number of times such over aced for sposal y serviced container, exceed twenty-percent (20%) of the total nurber placed collection point during any calendar that notify the. University of the month. In which case, the city will frequ.r,cy at said collection need for increased container ca the collectlai schedule point, and the City wilf accordingly or service and the monthly fee charged the University. The University may refuse such adjustment when Initially notified by the Clty, but may colllong~~ require the City to collect waste not deposited in d the Point in question, unpsters at Should durpsters be overloaded so as to make them unserviceable, additional charges may bs made to the University for efforts Y or costs to restore lncurr ed the _erviceeb by the City in its ex le tY of the For m+P , the containers In removal and disposal of large quantities of construgctiamir~raterial (e.g., rock, iron, concrete, s011) and/or wetted garbage may require time application of additional equipment and personnel, the cost of which would be billed to the University, 1 I A separate agreement will be required for the collection and disposal of special wastes, (See Texas Department of Health Regulation 325.136.) The City cannot collect or dispose of hazardous waste, (See Texas Der of Health Regulation 325,291 - 325,316.) Aa tenant i ~ AIAOAA,w I C Page ? of 4 Pages C EXCEPTION 03 i j 8y law, this proposal Is subject to Denton City Council's review and approval of a contract between the City of Denton and the University that would restate the terms and conditions of this proposal as submitted. t w i 'I I , ' I I~ 4 1 ~ 1 1 I I I r... ! .i Page 3 of 4 Pages i t REFERENCES i 1. The University of North Texas Denton, Texas 76203 2. Denton Independent School District Post Office Box 2387 Denton, Texas 76201 j 3. Denton State School State School Road Denton, Texas 76201 4. Tetra Pak i 3330 Airport Road Denton, Texas 76201 1 S. Andrew Corporation 2701 Mayhill Road Denton, Texas 76201 6. Winn-Dixte i , 1802 Alice 6 University Denton, Texas 76201 7. Wyatt's Cafeteria 1008 W. University Denton, Texas 76201 s 8. GTE 310 W. Hickory 1 Denton, Texas 76201 4. Skaggs Alpha-Beta 2321 University Denton, Texas 76201 to. Golden Trlangle Ma11 I 2201 I-35 Denton, Texas 76201 I j 1Ji 11. Peterblit 5 Airport Road Denton, Texas 76201 ii i i ....,W 4sw07018812 7- Ole- j Page 4 of 4 Pages I l I 12, Pillsbury j 1725 Cooper Creek E f Denton, Texas 76201 i 13. Victor Equipment Campany 2800 Airport Road Denton, Texas 76201 i 14. Russo 1f-Nevaw 320 E. Hickory I Denton, Texas 76201 { i Additional references available upon request. E i i ,r i 4 I } I ~I 4*47018812 - =,1 rll~ I , rReel ' 335.11 P SUBCHAPTER B. Municipal Solid-Waste Stora`e. p3S.21 ArrliakCi I- IU sobdnapta shay be applicable talmn shelf be of suitable strength to minimise animal to all public and private stomp systems. Additional re• saveagal or rupture daring collection operations. quirstneats for storage of buardous wean are contains. (2) Reusable Coauhmn. Rentable containers ad is §1325.211.325.350 of this tick (relating to Huard• shall be malmainod Is a dam condition so that they do oa Waste Management). M coaatitau a aukana and to retard the harborage, 132$.23 Stoop RNalrsaeele. A11 solid waste shalt be feedrag, a propagation containers of tvactors. o be emptkd ataausuy moral in such a manna tsar it doss not constitute a fire, shall be capableof heal serviced wahout the eolkaor safety. or heahk hazard or provide food or harbomp i for animals and vectors, and shah be contained or bun. cooling into wick the slid we" died so as not to rook in litter. It shall be the respoa. (S) Containers to be meekankally bandied sibility of the occupant of a rpidena or the owner or shall W dodpsed to prove spillage or leakage during manaM of an atablkhmem to utilise stomp c nts"m storage, handling, or transport. of an adequate size and streagth, and in sufficient Ouse. f 3!!.!i allows' Cobedan Sodom ' collactios other unnu ben. to oomeln all solid wane that the residence be between stations should be provided with the type and quantity eol generates in the period of time between weea of containers compsu'ble with the areas to be served. cdlooi leaiotss. Rules should be posted lloverdag the use of the fatdlky 133S.23 Approved Contalum Age solid waste contain. to indode who may use it. what may or may not be i r ing food wastes shell be mored in covered or closed con. deposited, etc. The responsibk county or municipal a tainen which are leakproof, durable, and designed for gaveranwat shell provide for the collection of deposited F safe handling and easy cleaning. waste an a schodufed bads and supervise the faeNty in (1) Nonreusabk Containers. Nonreuabie coa- order to maintain it in a sanitary condition. i i I I i i l j I I - ~ i 10 ~7w lQp~.,. itrlP~ r ~ ie" T ~~1t 7 f i L i i ~ E i r j I ~ 1 I i 1 ~ 4 I 1 1 j i 1 ~IrJ ;E i 1 i { I I 0110 s T I NOTICE OF EFFECTIVE TAX RATE 1990 Property Tax Rates in City of Denton S j This notice concerns 1990 property tax rates for City of Denton. It presents information about three tax rates. Last year's tax rate is the actual rate the taxing unit used to determine property taxes last year. This year's effective tax rate would impose the same total taxes as last year if you compare properties taxed In both years. This year's rollback tax rate is the highest tax rate the taxing unit can set before taxpayers can start tax rollback procedures. In each case these rates are found by dividing the total amount of taxes by the tax base (the total value of taxable property) with adjustments as required by state law. The rates are given per $100 of property value. Last year's tax rate: Last year's operating taxes } 8,810,254 + Last year's debt taxes $ 4,414,258 j I • Last year's total taxes $ 13,224,522 Last year's tax base $2,138,852,061 • Last year's total tax rate $ .6183/$100 f i k This year's effective tax rate: Last year's adjusted taxes (after subtracting taxes on lost property $ 13,224,582 and taxes to correct appraisal roll errors) This year's adjusted tax base (after subtracting taxes on new property) $2,018,050,520 This year's effective tax rate $ '6553/$100 { x 1.03 • Maximum rate unless unit publishes notices and holds hearings $ .6750/}100 This year's rollback tax rate: Last year's adjusted operating taxes (after subtracting taxes on lost property j and taxes to correct appraisal roll errors and adding taxes lost in court suits) $ 8,162,916 This year's adjusted tax base (after subtracting taxes on new property) $2,018,060,620 • This year's effective operating rate $ .4342/$100 ` x 1.08 • This year's m:axfmum operating rate } .4689/5100 + This year's debt rate } .2105/4100 $ .6794/$100 • This year's rollback rate 4753F 08/08/90 I Y1 . ..lit !,'Y.i.. l... , ,.i.,i:. .y v ~ PF' i 1 SCHEDULE A: Unencumbered Fund Balances f r The following balances will probably be left in the unit's property tax accounts at the end of the fiscal year. These balances are not encumbered by a corresponding debt obligation. Protected Type of Property Tax Fund Balance General Fund $3,138,744 General Debt Service Fund $ 562,110 SCHEDULE B: 1990 Debt Service The unit plans to pay the following amounts for long-term debts that are secured by property taxes, These amounts will be paid from property tax revenues (or additional sales tax revenues, if applicable). Principal A Interest Requirements for 1990-91 ~ Description of Debt P- F- pa interest Total 1985 General Obligation Refunding $1,755,000 $1,134,524 $2,889,528 1987 General Obligation 1750000 2420550 4170550 1987 Certificates of Obligation 25,000 29,850 549850 1987A Certificates of Obligation 1200000 53,710 1739710 1988 General Obligation 175,000 251,263 426,263 1989 General Obligation 175,000 2830424 458,424 1989 Certificates of Obligation 25,000 270450 52,450 1989A Certificates of Obligation 1500000 1120025 262,025 $29600,000 $2,134,800 $4,734,800 1'aying Agent Fees 121000 Total required for 1990 debt service $4,746,800 Amount (if any) paid from funds listed in Schedule A 460,000 - Excess collections last year 0 Total to be paid from taxes in 1990 $4,2869800 + Amount added in anticipation that the unit will collect 100% of its taxes in 1989 $ 0 Total Debt Service Levy $40286,800 This notice contains a summary of actual effective and rollback tax rate I calculations. You can inspect a copy of the full calculations at the Office J of the City Secretary, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas. Name of person preparing this notice: Monte Mercer Title: Controller Date Prepared: July 30, 1990 4754F Ile • I 9 ~ I I I~ I I ~ ~ pct 1 I I' 1 11 III I n a i CITY of DENTON 1215 E. McKinney / Denton, Texas 76201 ~ q MEMORANDUM DATE: July 31, 1990 TO: John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance FROM: Monte Mercer, Controller SUBJECT: Collection Rates for 1989-90 and 1990-91 R This is to certify that the anticipated collection rate used for tax rate calculations is 1001 for the 1990-91 budget year. The actual collection rate for budget year 1988-89 was ninety-seven (971) percent, The actual collection rate for the 1989-90 budg.; yeei through July 31st is ninety-four (941) percent. MMcD:af 476SF 1 ~ i i S e / I r Y r~ir~Ct3•: tilt' 1 t~+ a s nl~r gj M1 i Y ~ ~ •r~ p. r -fit ,i_ I r r I i+: w c `7 a r j r r z~ t' 'o 1 A i r y t alt{i' I r i I ~~G ri ~p r '.I ~ 9 L L~ Y r ~,r p'G~ r, 1 A+ ~"/kt y1+ rr rt dy'. r f Y t?~ ~~'thitA~ rrt~. l 4'[~,}~ i,i ~ t f tl[ Y ^ Pt ~r t4}, t r [I rT. )4 P~' e~ Y t~ ~i a t r~ + ti .f t [ wH y r I ~ M~ ,fr r~~'k~.3" t ~ a It t1 r b .4 7 u~ t ? :ham 4.'1~ £ ley e y{. J ~r 1 1 t rj C. ^~4 !t,.r ~i t J~r'QfJ ~ t J I ~ el [ 1'~r , r t 4 ~ y~ ~ ~ r i .f ~ D ~ f ~ Y rl May ! p. v, {~D} ie I ~'S f ,e ~ I rt 1r'V~ 1 r 41f rib, l r a r<,'#j 4 9 {I' r~ ' M IN' a rA H n Y r tiit4 b Fq pk 7 r r ;°i.#.~`- . i~ .4x ° ' rT s tr 1 t e + ~ J F . < i~~+ IW y 4 ° .i d 1~ 4t t P qr SY I ~ l~.kl ~~r~~'nr~+~'~^~y°'~,~~" ~'tt ~ ''S F~~,~~+,~fy ~•Y~4s ,,~~F t~?r5'~+~ .r 7 4rc P y 0.~tiil ♦,r ~k ~k~ 1 ~#{sr it 'er~t ~~~i6^ ~r~t , ~ t 4he4 x3fi ~ ~ iLa I .fill l xt~ ~ ~1~'[~.ds. ~ ~ tfe~~'P a.r +5ka t ~ }+d 1^J~'k 7 ~ z f3~qP4,.? t• W, n ~ V 5 f r 3F S N W f4 y$y pp A ,,tt ~ { T~{p F lJ1~ C [ ~~I r ~~`Y~St'{~ '~n Ix~~~ '~^~5~~ ik' }ttt+~ ^1~~'a'~~~ p •Y'~ ! pq e,fsrn tt4 [ t ~f~x~yr t e~ J fA~ IJ ~ 1 ~ tyt~i S~a v~' `^~°r 1~t i w 13it L to [ ,rc) l~4t .qfi~ ~'I~~ f rq I e Z n 'Ht r~6i, r lk' ~i' rJ e- ~ t I ~ 1+a+~'+ r. tt yr 3' p r ~ w . n t 1 L Ia x f ~X" a i i r'. { r I r t f ,y n r1 i t ~ i b fit. t1 + g1 L dh 'C 4t { re t~,'M1~ 17 +Y'Cti r f H ^k~ he L 1rtF ya- Yr' e"~ rr F J f t a Y jt~a,ortA[~j~~+~9 iy''' ? ML if x S~Y+{e ~r `j}~ird ra r tM rw i4 ^'d~i~'( IS M[it~u.~✓}N MiY.;Aey''~! tJilr t9N 1i1 t1f i K r~ L. 91ti r ~ 4 .f } I r , i I +r l a r r AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL } August 21, 1990 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday. August 21, 1990, at 5:15 p.m. In the Civil Defense Room of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: Note: Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may also be considered as part of the Agenda for the Regular meeting. 5:15 P.M. 1. Staff Budget Presentations E t 5:15 - 5:45 A. Financial/Information Services Finance Administration/Risk Management Accounting/Customer Service/Purchasing/Warehouse Treasury/Municipal Court/Tax E Information Services/Word Processing I 5:45 - 6:15 B. Electric utilities 6:15 - 6:35 C. Water Utilities 6:35 - 6:55 D. Wastewater Utilities Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, August 21, 1990, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following { items will be considered: i 7:00 p.m. ~ i. Consider approval of the minutes of regular session of July 17, 1990. ! Yard of the Month Presentations for August. 3. Consider approval of a resolution supporting the expansion of Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. r r E '~41 NIEMEN ~r ' t t { 7 City of Denton City Council Agenda r August 21. 1990 Page 2 4. Consent Agenda Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be k approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the 1 agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 5.A, S.B. S.C. S.D., S.E.). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance. A. Bids and Purchase orders: 1. Bid 01116 - Street Sweeper I 2. Bid 01130 - CRT's Controller, Printer System 7 3. Bid #1131 - Maintenance of PC and Related li Equipment 4. Bid 01133 - Padmounted Capacitor Banks 5. Bid 01128 - Alexander Drainage 6. Bid #1132 - West Oak Paving and Drainage I P.O. #98817 - American Management System 6. P.O. 098818 - IBM 1 9. P.O. 098813 - Eastern Electric 10. Bid #1069 - Change Order for Oak Hickory 6 Fry Paving and Drainage 5. Ordinances f A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. (4.A.1. - Bid 01116, 4.A.2. - Bid #1130, 4.A.3 - Bid #1131, 4.A.4. - Bid 01133) B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. Bid 01128, 4.A.6. - Bid #1132) ! j 1 FF City of Denton City Council Agenda August 21, 1990 Page 3 C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of 1t rompetitive bids. (4.A.9. - P.O. #98613) j D. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the execution of a change order to a contract between the City of Denton and Jagoe Public Construction; and providing for an increase in the contract 1 price. (4.A.10. - Bid #1069) 1 a E. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for purchases of materials or equipment which are available from j one source in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. (4.h.7. - P.O. #98817, 4.A.6. - P.O. #98818) F. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending Sec. 3-14 of Chapter 3 (Airports and Aircraft) of the Code of ordinances, by prohibiting the operation of ultra-light aircraft on the City of Denton Municipal Airport and within the established 4 traffic patterns of the City of Denton Municipal j Airport; containing findings of facts; providing that any person violating the terms of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor I and upon conviction shall be fined in any sum not mote than two hundred dollars ($200.00); and providing for an effective date hereof. (The Airport Advisory Board recommends approval.) E t 0. Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton approving the 1990 Appraisal Roll as certified by the Appraisal Review Board and submitted by the Denton Central Appraisal District. 6. Resolutions A. Consider approval of a resolution adopting the 1991-1995 Capital Improvement Plan. (The i Planning and zoning Commission recommends ]t approval.) N-1 I i i! I i t r City of Denton City Council Agenda Augcst 21, 1990 Page 4 B. Consider approval of d resolution authorizing condemnation of real property necessary for the construction of drainage improvements near Willow Springs Drive. t C. Consider approval of a resolution adopting a ■ revised investment policy for the City of Denton \n to replace the existing investment policy. (The Investment Committee recommends approval.) 7. Consider approval of a revised policy regarding candidate water and sewer lines. (The Public i Utilities Board and the Planning and zoning Commission recommend approval.) j 8. Consider approval of a request by Forest Hill k2 Wdt(A Supply Corporation to receive a Certificate of j Convenience and Necessity for water service. (The E Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) i 9. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. A. Monthly Budget Update l 10. Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments li 11. New Business: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 12. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 1 V.A.T.S. } B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 i V. A. T. S. C. Personnel/roacd Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), I Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. ' I ~r 'h i 4 l City of Denton City Council Agenda August 21, 1990 6 Page 5 NOTE: THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO r EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT 1S LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE. s ; r C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton. Texas, on the _ lay of 1990 at o'clock ; t ~ y I CITY SECRETARY j 3287C 1 EIf I 1 ~t i t i iv J r;y J{ i , l i 4 ~rvr.n• F ~ r ~ CITY COUNCIL; r TIM: F I~ ~ as kr k DoN. ~p0 ~Q OLO~ 1 4 ~JP II P ja/sy(Y 1 { 17 ~ i q~0 c~..Quz, P~ CITX COUNCIL. I~ i 'j w r i Mf 4 O a 6L II i I t • j f Y}t{ I P Y North Texas Commisslon - DFW International Airport _ Expansion Task Force August 90 1990 suss" MeW BalmrCa70= nf A CFO ism The Hon. Bob Castleberry Cnd gn nMki ~ Mayor of Denton 215 Fast WS prey Denton, TX 76201 Dear Mayor Castleberryn 7te Dallas/Fort Worth Interrationnl Airport is currently proposing expansion of existing facilities in order to accommodate the anticipated growth in air travel in the Month Taxes area and beyond far into the year 2000. As Mayon of the Town of Addison and Co-Chairman of the MC/DFW Expansion peek Form Morth Texas Cities and Chambers of Commerce Coordinating Camatttse, I man acutely, aware of the significarre an efficient airport has on cmating and maintaining a sound eoonamic structure for a gmdM camaunity. DEW Airport is the soonomio cgine that drives the Metropiex and m need your help to maintain its orampatitivsrwss. 1 Ws, as a region, must join together to support respasible growth at DEW Airport. It is essential that each city goven sent in the Borth Texas am act now to adopt resolution in support of the Dallas/Fort Worth InterAational Airport. The impact of those resolution cannot be underestimated. E Plsass maidw this a fornal rwpmt to place the oo siderstion of a resolution in support of the DEW expersion on your agerds. Its attached mterials should wwwormost of your ;cations regarding me/DEW Exparsfm Task For activities. Via are eager to have you and your community inwlved in thsss activities. If you beliem that a pmasantatirn by the task farce would be appsropriata please contact es at (214) 450-7026, or Sherry Durdin of the WC staff at (714) 621-0400. thus offoct of AU communities is crucial to the succours of this effort. Please act now. S , \ . Spruill i . i Wide attachlvm" Aditsc P.O. Bow 610246 DFW Mpo+1, fereF 752E 1 44phonr Mono (214) 6214OW r„ I l4' us td 9a is:ty 4y~11 M u91ts hI~ 60 uu2 ' • e stions AIRPORT EXPANSION INFORMATION propcty owaes star DFW slog u me alrpaa (tvavtY% M114 nixed for 11=t".1d sod many Bo w xa 1976-~, lout tratllc Iaremadooal Abpon tad otter wa5avmo4 em). The rwof more roam and Airmft utalaw at DFW grvW by 123 patau. ""dears thimthozt the North the !Dada wa:dd come Pd' once fealidm. oomp=M tyb t 14 perow ht. Taw region have tdred =Y eau Ic: am= by tbo did! 1" The migioal mute plan &W caeca in dv tame paw bi vlded for in an tide Mule. And in 1989, DEW aor• I"yoeactquetdoct dvr4 the No l xnl tax dollaa voaId be. ➢ro iecetti ' I ~vtoameatal Impact Sir rt u needed. kywwa Malay tad two vat puYd Adana in mpaamtd of b"CAi ddsStortTatro-0NsodLaadu8 ehct4apaImpr amenmmts rttd t (EIS)rvawabomtheprovs,•d Rmtway16lb4E,proposed 9VLbnntlmpt otyaadonofthelirport. mb4operodosel101992.voaid ('M')rucaays(nnypMA- tm DFW Atport it e0mM!Md a be 1100 log f tab blue Sea air Malay the same landau as the W thou DFW may, become u W4.'l ftctud and thoroulb cemdt xa wuty. The leany proles Cew rtdwa~toet aled N Wnpet 04 lir in Ch"6% . DA wrvr s e tri CrMdotts L• s$1 be MW mealy fbr sir molar povno and YAduft od rk. Wshlel added tapt• Waved bee us servers 00 MMY t~th u we u c3vals and is the orltwI anuses plan we et me mar 5K%ndy Wmd depattmu by oummullf-O a Water Gooded u adent4y said tirl, DPW =a to Was its We- qundaoe. faPormtdoa to d!v(ded n ktaam Ytabohs nvr+lt vlil re ovt baaase aritdoa damaads peddw adveoapa ovs WW btto the foIIoabalt eow"t thin nmvty as a Mus" r for the haw maspd bam+da07 ilaae x per d Pens BtckgMond. Nerd foe P.sptedee. cuts not WMth runways oa all rho fat etwr Flu ire adogu& stud* by 1119 Pedal ArL. Safuxy, Nola, MW&I dm Alan u-needed bads The trmtvay Is Of 64 gbPM a bald eq dtu tin Admltdeesdoa (FAN, the lva and Ceoeal LPotmaooa not expeeW to be used by any the *dlM mam plan ailed DPW tuff and hilbly quelltfed ou r dn"A dorsal N use 210 for. de. eoet etdy woald teomd outilde ==I=* btve We- n y ai of ate imptovemeab coemlpendently ooeduded mar DFW Awcordrtmway,l6(l4W,h 7*pofdfrDFWJ Meet be"aded "Wbat eauelr Is b~8 Pro' pepo{pd fa de was side of t(u The od81m1 manes plan was posed in the alrpod up""em akpWt, WOMI,B o9asde°d fa a good belinnial. But it was Preinm 1997. It vAdd be 9910' W ap➢rovedbefwe the sidles lodmo As pct of a aompreberulw Aar- I=%* sad W us it expected to try was dagpkwd is 1978. To- FortDevelopmea nee, DPW t, be dm0ee to 1 M4& day, b is emadel gins DPW be poPednl m odd tore sew amt- The ens Me%" cat . t• doWopdd erd 40#01" ~ scum n 1 the s A Oct oc the gut mated to vat more A" A '0 (od ~iy iw~ ~ , of rvawtys~ Brasraya 1 dde of iupoR me ate tm MO O& the cat aids. Other dements of Americas Atli-,valet is by dwepdtdw. 1W, d me ADPlaelade heWgsuweeduDFW. sod FWA-6,011y,911mseter I&MWbetwd2" • tudsvs Ddm Alt Wes, me D&W mdoe plan ft ddn. shp" std ad,a no air7e0. t(Wl-tad me FM *0 joamajeW 0garA&S &W tab twee ar DFW, eta an Po- m $or pablle a dda ev ab}ea am" 2068 eA* Wixtr emeets c to rtfap. Far example the rdi &-!p4d Povlde rtes me i tededpt of the dryat's dpj&aody eppede tbrh pww hW system Was am hWuntarplufalboTaxas seeds: a DPW Wbas -~8 I ~ ~ G~ Bet i od in as IML Cbodde hoar Dowd opssdog puma, the MW Wend du ADP asp for zm wrodd be ff dw m 1iapLe ntntstyaw111 be sad prhmedlr $3 S bOtloe teat of twos- s far dr eaMeralrsla ad Dom 66 i ame j fmdt beat the Ahpon ~ yei mnooommodus fbttwrt ~ fuivah tad depw CM WhIlatmeembs MW hA W.1no toads beck. TG edtdod DPW Attyw pfaar m grramda nfe SiatOatf y. trtea ehroayeet rho eS by the ddLW add lovweaatt Plea wereenact sway Poor mffM~ mace s presets and ft= demaodae t~l ew B nvyv 1N349aY sod dandy 5om the abi(aathem- Wostladyane+e titL eY la eelvws. Abort li J b®oawadd font m Mee WP Thu Mrs MOW PLO proj*lod clay as 2.21k be epeeoetrmmobaeebdL' maspoetebndaTM➢Laafro W"Mdtbat bar 20fT6e WAY AY 20 auad aspaa1an it ueamem m duo atnIImt pkll- eizi I ptecoM DEW s two- 09MI wYhti MW b "M et stryallod. I Ulklm tope to lee Zlv%vw "Does DFW rally peed two nmhf pmpett lteeooat2" eeaetstinlITWAdeala The FM'spdWymWMIe ebpcat hatndLe man a wd olo provide t cab tad emalam Ana DFW cod *I& h%W VW66 syseeca vbM ooustbame emottya" to eadoal Wonky sod to pro- Adoset s Watrfi rommad al soft ottl.S. avia&&" 130 AhpatbtededY FMaaootaP➢teveanyPel'*e 778 000 a11noflh sad hmdlnP bt datdoa as rases the bi8eeee \ A 1198. Wempued WU VS.000 u nb4 stmduh madw6 by DFW. Be. the Adima drpokt law. DFW has mot at by tsa at!llar Lvm a blab P=MP of aided an fedsal Len sad team' delays, sod d mM cfl dab is Ldoat Is dddpdog ms Pv➢esed Atum mpenobtM baW etmwga. Too 0 Poem (tsdf ~ Mother rtmiray m ndleva wave duW vwlvdMly wkh aviroe• d the worms cwter-oe- moral haam 1 J a f, . US- Id 90 IS; 10 44211 929 0916 ~'7C' @ 061 f ~ keyadtoi wletY, fit FM TN tdtport w is ptnoain[ auocedmat ahRtll mv lmgmt, v ho oegtdnd tha the mw ma- m Fntchw wdkktmd Pa"'I tmdothar hags wept bo oepaemd Laos odtdot $to= to DFW. u m*ed 1w "Why am babe ptajedlc a'. for The pmpem dam amm an rmweys by at bag 1,000 reef Or dea um and midptdm pmt the htWw rmrrey1 Dm1 ob den we44W lolortoadao VD ai- afeg tnsom u VM3 as m Blow Poau We Resod phut of =his the dlaacce from VAM on for U eimubaae0t36 advals_ nowr gap a Wmnat Ww the pyortd "I tight pupa fa Tbh umma adon wpom m "may are tor' ciar sobu far happue F Sup H SIman uw wch d r A apan" The to thm 4.toacitics #crd wad tbo Saw «aowge ®aSa thu bet phuW "M colts I= each aftmft opuatton oat cmu pets with or try dm- dte ededmg dur snot for The ahpm tahlgatim pLois is Socmcolmd u each polar on gemmlr aloe to aaome &P- otter rmawmyet" hued m the bee bifamadaa the pmd mdag L& m whafot- P WSedtr. cm b In- Tbyn tta. Vwmt a adm . available show me type o ah• ogy. Podmr m the 9C~ Wkt clm~ opsd lad a DFW thmW as be arAtm wM be opembS u coffee Ldm `'Sloe in do a=- Aoposed hapm mwa u act had whh lderr roast" w DFW oft or un20 yum The nwmd wSda a dae, coming the DFW W&M uhq lhom a 2=- dgat'rooe It a denaed nr m Pm1ww wfw ooeeamt Seaga Como= fct met sapmae lave bgrOfinero oomd raft wM M 4*ed by tbo FAA. A oleos tone the ahport'a dedm m pW ft thr ~ thb dS. ~ rm is ow blib tm mama mvbotmr on-a- ' = 200 d Imm wows ender ~Sht m o d tttmw Ic 4 a" In tad yS faa atraM& the matt ttkadomaimsp+~Sadair IMPL An osm randb mfaimam ls aommomlyneedaomaut!aSoo- ooiw ' ttaflio roonailma. Akhwsh nee DPWW clemw rnwip tk dr e ~ by dte Tb4 The tm* wh h D f 9p~ 1 dk Wj pic d die",, 2.900•fwclwrams requited by to a sfmwl, Avwrku ad t-oaaw"w aS rhea burled m a i ttojea, fe FM hu oommtrted 'the FAA. Dell; an ammg the ka&n % but mop Wbkb oomWat the do- 'q modwaitdaf DFFW's soft &Ir ll the wiadot W=tty h poroyt• Pang botmdilm, taaaailed nefao omaal ryw m over dx bat gdiwSmp M ehmth mtr► ud Douadedae of anroan4 am hw ymi, begets Fhb Thew antign pmjm fat A" Los cownri" Y"t wm be 90 paom Smp M by NWw tartiir ate dome llot New ranter WEI Sam 1991. Old& Soya IT odtaah we now sod mamb tame ymn d i ` DFW n beep dumb opsndau tstwttwr err Drug phased am w u fadaaaT apwadoo. Tbey m04 t otaicg meetly sad w* q sot ea nr~- ! wtda ba" fe bot, Sass Q vavs0ahts the dabs- ere teem tar aitpoe a dpdEnat rtray 4 +t aatt in mo haw bob f b>dh P~ dahaSttopsraboa l4dm t wbty c"Aderdm is Leda • Lew r trmw As ehihau paw to sommaodaw odw panpeedvR m tadshbadag Sdm b whmnd wbm atatdt yaw r gu.t.t~ s t, t tweeagar defame, fey wM deioye an allaehmeedae rcpt p a t+av \ '.:S oeaeMm7ybe opdabg b+4 DPpp W freer awt aEdoom- a abwtme mbdmam. dwm by pmvhednf mew 3tAp M waif O doom m miw eadw, t trd bwnm montbab 20 oom- 'TheWrpattrm&Vwyftag petw*WWaamdwmfr a lkar Ndphbor, Ply w mfslmbe a" la taw a rmweyt wM be ued. pm an nddow gnu week= Addicmdy. iodeft wu dot dhave ban asked ebaa the pc leg frith the PM bed set mmd m dette®be w4a a aotw ba Mtay wM bt me [)ut! Bid wM am mw. *pm t N expannrmm projem it DFW bra madmg Abya L out du+ Oommbaim to meta gram you bn aam" taawtm to lstdmde SQ tb Stcbrldut de !B Qu akm T't4 maamrVI OoCta{bt mww Lm $sa the AmaW~Y UMPtm At d"N.Gai fIN W taraYn~ mat oommaky aw drt hm tlaemm N u rho tSaiSltugstmwge i the ukew by the is" &M* the aftpon% t~~ bmul~t w a mm Wepad. I* pica It, 4004W 0 ,may tease aoiu empaclb/rg een &0Laaaow"a- twedios mdm5eaiaa aotse~ Rad tda no e Oren du rut two tb Bard aad dr ~ haw cooridwtd tmmaraaf a Slrtaadret The atnff- 11mw4 Vw Flu wdlbe tm tdm b w"W by t ol" the able kIOU tads Lu 0anttnaed na dW dtabat obow vkwed em ay et is ceded. mmumad hamodu Ape true to to allow DPW by a~db+~ Mu IWW tuawayR and wm bosndwd ar tba uw cy mdthi Depmoom of Oa► 1 Thin wID g➢bw tba t P*d rhtway bra do" b4t +w trmmgrl apw.dmal ins aed vem Drmkpm d u ky Wbb wft ably 1 giadrdy IMU anowt of "t♦ow gab rte tttmtaarM *4 mudwd for mwmdag a" WPeat Lem Mm an sew Wlthtbae nn► nmwiyb DF~V wW ammlma to ~~irr ive dai a D7t9P1^ mmo daft t 244ar PWA waa m~ier wtpomw nloadane and btimw dbta to oar area, ae~! llmflb Boman S of jab far DPW hu doae maiv..ew tlme raw evg..ra is an=tged Om! me& aver CA OW 20 ye" mode l o batcA Ae depot ud Mway wd*md as ds *mr #f etdla mm or tan men Iowa rhea M wish Sop' m'dw vasry~oRadiea peolsa, tomb mddom TDB mmthabt w date a closydie °0ba and bubm aware hs oommtmltSei twr DFW amt- damnbe dw adobs cooAdw agow mu aab wood ub ud bWiy wt71 b ollpta0ad Or The Hood and u the dTw aid in INGUM attar apwb pedd fat by dMI i arof me altpos taobplu thta f A and we in ram. wammida 7b dm wM be esrpon be ohpetlnl" taitbd to baott tamdlba to omrncighbata Wi belitw need b t bade for aampadeg The FM N*u dr dq m to 4. mtdpdoapro gm~ dis ftm&y nadh" v i~ i Mad r adedog doltrldavedaholltfhy ld New ttoeiut atsP a. Pw' duel teeS+aa 7lseeyaa east if pat have addidws? gwadoor, pkm 00 the Action da FA poem bbm ktdapeodeu aeaeebaa to Crmrt at lvletm (214) 37434'10, and wa web be s6d to wu ado abs the FM that aaa db ' , a £db weep Sod mg moom etMm kr tha& 1 adrt Y~ ado I"& aft an &I" $ type b ore w". Tw olea Tbm tsdepeadmttewnWetom kxiad-,red&♦efmmedoa mtmteafetaaaogfd obomt rat *pm amb u arches, ttetpeetai tSme b drtfmhed maaumpmmee,mmgyoo& grew theynto~amP ~ Fd+ aa" ku da drm ltRatiy g! o my. D!W Orao~aa dr r I%W 0:11011111M Gomm DFW Abyott Hood adg game III" op~iwbi aeYtW a 61 npudba of ub-1d aU W11 0214 929 Vale 5IC mUUl s 4 the w>a review each region w most powlaa dcMcod. • • - - • • - e • ale mdivipu~:Ey mad wm ao- and it bdpini oo f0d t way of am cempemcdq POP" avea0 Ivisdoo reeds la Naem r nwnem who am pff4de door- Temu bwo am Nash Comm, OeAeamtSK vmteeshave ftOmmom&bm25% lrawever;mWaoihDF9lnc* con= meotahb pmpof dot d>eh peopmty Teat Omt of Ctavaamma 'Whwd 1 doe to da pwpmed cmpudom am tit to va mi twpiaatl tv orlon rymem emedm m bnat• mad roe beet= of odor Amtaem Pan" the Ahpmt 8oad bPfl7 j °u I sic m M olon wemwt is aepomb's only for vwdq ` w *ft the depart, don't I eve up DFW t$aed~mmldepot uda al my dpoot" WRat bappw u uuhodndoe from dr Tau c me calm eomloest (aawe7" Lo><elmwae• I` The psoperp ownadoes act cob and TW lqa olscbt dpw~mWwam du & to ~ u A p C B dq nnibm veW mate hupaa emd mepmdm V aoewimfa me tM The m sectem mm sped6ratiil do stem die aooduiami Dadra wMah a &=I may opsmae im do POP aja cot mlhe . • styY tigpege. 1ltbese coral- } pan" Oa DPN Ape ciao nohomaed,thepmpeep' con~•°woddmoumiwsp Owner SPINnbdmanoispl bDM am= tgdma mphmtrhe thpaet. Ins to psma° 411aa fW avow tom the da 15• eteameat awud ei acbI&W In Prague dmmap madat direct Grego m m amomtr fpm sfic; opamdaa mt wbh• in me drape of dm eemmut mgr aAMWIA-tlttdaa dutahltam ebm• DeoompmmEla Theamiemwt bad plom of udvhyy *mm at 0 eemmtae u4h the ptapaey tt the i~t thattaWmen ataayt a time of ale and Is gsc% d on r" tremtn p taeiwn the ham they tan hmch q teuw,e m, mead mere N~ o...rp..a f.e+.•+rw uru.. n.... rt..d..t a o...a ve•s ota .rma.w.e..rt WWrN m' 11:19. .smlanu fmlc rntap dS* If nR-WvUL,SAWmumm.w me..aW" 4u~es•smt Vadettbaptopaendmldp cmetrtnawtdaew'eolQrvice y Yea! at ee.lw 1r 11W 4 Rwm ~ W. ante meet and to dog pp~, body ~ wiA- L b o w~serpeeent• m.ymgeeee.e~.a.a~ It dm 65- 70 idn ae6 wEJea to mne.r. UWak dteamaeoma were eoedYer WWA" Itdwarmament Mintywmle'ttimsmeistu 6NdeM.UwelamatLwwMwaM•mae+ ~0° aicAm buim ms. tWt flm by ADdafmi um- The rxpdm ppaetm is bud Aadd* m4i ptopaty la d+t 767s be't Mm Bever, drys oat pld on P*C and mtm hepaete• Moe tdo WT" Men world bs par- to WW attet b went; m beer, house m "I wtll be hapwrl d"4- emd al r'9'4 A98mi tbak jab is tai pdme u moth dons in Emlees mad t}npevi. far Cb" tans world 6►pao- dam m pomilL with whieh me emvaml"mate. f1, Rcnwmy DPN hes Pmpattd Pm+' fAA cu maim dmeldou tbcm %ull woomeome m dat to rem ache moahaflaP tf bft ptoJmos mc6 a dm DeN Ahpat 19n wbo u 1484 N won i odvtt pembdm n o0waa due 1)eeelapmmmpyd rgt opervNIAdeanf Lm. be ewooewnowto TWaefrm Ilylq Is end out of DPW m dr of robe moaltodns and oche eta eidn llw yea or emombe• papa$ Wm ;pow dr eiep d m "I(y bowls scram the ehmd r fam f WNW ark naway Umm al" tnd hem lM mebe Mfptlt tmtdp be opersdauaL soda odds pmmeaes dens use. Rby W t as 11e h /yaomimme~ po su G aablloedhy eye lvavhpm canal wppyf no't A~trror Loa daaea Is Oa prabewm!" ebo, f pvm be adog d t deft em lmpwt statamemt It will- I) alp ywhumie Ae ndadmd Tba nwmt wbtwmidpdoa b Igp7, wbmRanwy fa t eyptwnmw mvbotaS$" dom" WAW O(Dm ' propol erta eammedhbw 1481Wwpaldbein early 2)foQdtsmowaYSwarin• ;tans the papematae of ID dace nememe oomplleooK a n yort Naffh AObomAhpathf e award u the bumcbmadt fes mbv:mb b tm•momd q be aoboaa• "pare apwAge of mt mldp- f xhb and bdeoW eb pm L It tmidpdom poOaa Vaiora>ba dtawe ddb WOW. don pcoam b eotdteyema m beside area- aamly, dm Bmmma Adatdaam0y, berme PAW mead puew/ee r e endDa patows. nadvartirli wmy14848wMnotbeuln Lave fWaetmghmeMan ' bes aaempt m mtdatet acoi oeiah- oeneadq etmwmy. them mw fewee ,vppby b =Ft DPW comfdard heoml qgb. MA" badmd>!m wbetevefotdble opaedaedooomaffia w to me awned "to be proms atd+d4 bard X00 2° hie mbowdamode ohs dmAftatLow Ndda mn,im'iapm•lmuf•,bduS 5,6 104N. cm«►ym4 peadeemffdmiernmmly. beet ed or aama prvpfed4" DPW hu oomMmd mtm m mm AddimaeaDy, tow"br D~ b oammJmd n tonoM -How m im of bar tmoru anmtdwm m boa to ssm. and otpteityoammimt ad lot as e" Are an aelpdm roam;; west ON of the Haan. AS pmP eeeloes eh spent cabled W oowdr omw q*uuw ameoee "a be considered aipadel • goad- the dew tow" Wm toeea DFW ud LnwPW& local bWWU codes and lmedsl DPW hat emdbd oma mldpdm elbw DfW es rb'mmb doebla bm ttew6aom Emm@ Gees llmtalt eeaaedamt 8mwmees. teat of peopmtete Bad in pfopattd 2aA A" gwxb a wh11t 104°b' tb01q Hinter dpi/omnd! ~ drepetemrsVcotImpesmd afpdmrtammArhommb bad y ;moor;mf Wad ow AbbADewand Amow tress akeadylrw htma nand the ds L4m b pat atwhmb 6a• urjamedvmdfineored fens cot do emf6tkON*d m q lbredgbethedenspwrow an aaa domma. Ram u ~ to dm bdt•gaf dew tbpaa m beadb paws b omroeola m mdm uddpdoa plat s a aetmmd eiha of dm sells or 60 t@ mtme ogee mm aetdttyttma "Wty Is Ww arpeft a by a mow U.S. thpoR Oder eamer of vend" m SAO oo mmd he pmawq mus b man bomm he baby tW In p o mt nor fmm 10-IM dmeapboa dm dy bamemm~ ta~R+wD 14rl4N Passes add OtapteleN Ain't mhdamm* bee *mm dm 21li aYDa9 60 dnetap srfII bt ended a maaderrd Ins bob$ Las and Onpeeboer P° t: DfiV. moot deddldomai tbpmco hm ms tpR f;area ices 1 ~JJ aS-ld pu l9:lU *214 020 Upld Mc Zoos "Why halt a traypoel the Aword I to the FM GAUL • • • e010d07" vadoae teda+aa Is the awdoa Plan wMeamiq' abo have radled ft A "nyport it pmetatb pat• waypon oacc"t and •tsrv w tcayed u astvootdy located ► r. in ft ft&vwmdw mod, parAW an by dd ms, wr Male/"the well, Myles to dmt h a>!~t &M saadao and 1 tstmdwIlo ad ato taws ltam maseptomit ap ~ arym Aa FM penal reaatiy mcvw Mad &Up= develagawa ~ tavb+w'rdddacmceptaadooo- ~a" t , ~ elndadduttwr•fermdevdop meat of sae as IYOW Of wegM1 bard t 0 n to he aaaldoaai ' g tp LmOEt th jn ¢port and "Cm!1 B trot that tM west ten- dvw ry"M" tray study Is udar cautiv. In Neu die FM poet wd. daar CIOW Aat"be.ar an IbmW be U&M C. mt i mwq, Is be. i medo of rays tadubg *pat eye IMb2t an tar wee tlde of 6a t i i ' : J rid m Wsvlao pmbteaae oteoo Raper Ttdt aodtvq Wu ONDW ! ~ ~ ~ ' 11 SMIN tad dairy. The i+M foe 5t be ' r`,OWA pe0vide ippwprlm W p11n led wM cmafcc edme--A pact&t"upaedoaofetlsiat wmmadaldwelopmatofthe tdtpaa ad dmtopmeot of nest1476 ctLPW, v , MI* oew attpofn lamed u °c cY r / f soe watrfi',> Mwe moat tt 0 to 16 yam m Sc Slro ral4 being ei lard brily { ~ ►ur~tm~wt ' U Dada" ford ON or service by tbb 1,q tea The FM Grad sW OW project?" 69 Ms* ww &kp";qxftd h3 amour me h-us rradd have w TbO OV otCatpeviw hu w- ' behaar0yabdd ydA pmedcaemmowcthebel. fsdaA Poraamean Maur dm ante sehwd wbh ftaPea m l / .tadbr bobs mb m ww wave, dw uwtmmq, the bfldyedaa 6CI*w tp todw FAA, %MO Fla f*%a is Wool m appevai =*fed=40 bate air. by IM AbpodBOW sad the ~101~'f rOrrr.~ryreaan►wtearewr,w OveMe.ata 1 pain to met go &MO & atW of Dd" and Fan Wash) 'M' pn'r'.G°r taeq "e v "dN •fwt Td" N t aM, i 1 To do eo - RIN4tr106rayr ombraa■•tlnet.ew nw.VL 102.0 pmmieaseottstoatk pyspao4 meadfetaas yarO~t.wW■aiserr~rtwrrenr..t.rvmerr+rawp,.r.wataa,trrrt 1 ttevelopalaCtbOeysooddoawe tloaolrbsmiddleeebedroawt +rwu/atllratawdaaarey altaar.Meat ab.bbbaabammatdaxarf►. 6teecoaoauabonocisond .ety+aa.~arrra.MV.r.at3w^preatalr6 , kow b paoponow at6arfo w M4'• dapodmt a Me aaya; is pact "ft bwvtaire bom aay slur, watch i lose! Oaybymat 11 dw midpdwpbm hi ttld• of the oysm0 aeawop, Tory b" 611111 taw oldur ! Widtemensepdea,fhamt}or =*I;pm UQMPevlase bWwowbowoolmd taadklwbe to odadd~rkS Cb0Oyw4e>obod beard will sears ad 6w Mahe fm6 DEiVemmlli baremetttb6 1 egaedos m rerbneeaeed > b S ptadrwe 1hr elatldy fled and elate a~dalA mcpofildoa demad.• w6edat is sell dr eahaol or 12 the once aeoatddm dilk .Ala. II POP A MAW Adrowre ci wrypar sty Iosdytottl'la Is A do drpat teasels for •a aid baavld id reet• pa dda auapt iso"oveN a un *11 Sd bmim atroe4 to tltam lha the eaviaiedebtea ' frdaupmtiegi0aiwdysaed WWI. beDr'R, a ecasoelcts9eotbtaareatma dmoslomdr8{aFlow ' byaayen►iotatnaatu.lbw• pt :aforIlse bweOfaf ahlea AbpaflodsdatlwGlomdsae i ~wt.t6aPMpetrlwadbet AmolemAbdoser mmylwgbklainpeewmadrei wWP°a a➢peal m 7ltetttfbYatb Tam nSion "may drodd fbe RkW be m thee, eolodioa m Implm i Mere eedaw saws dot nosed u ~ ~r AION al{enad to 4fear.y'Gnpnde s valdeS Asa &I apretima pt.vat b a m I *&S ebpan w DOi aaa n A other M~>ttreM!" pt*M a WWAbpae "p~j ~ UN is 6" aatdr t mvw ww. Tie tlr Mda S.setit Or~.vlaell l 100 DPW NonndflM 1 t patbdabedtmpowsodm h*w=,e4w&4udamlle uYa.aa ! ~~aw~xem~dywonad aoedmeleht(atrmdleadele tnta[t6saragaedptoposed rrv~at.rw~rli+rrybtarW WPm~ evtrlaa-saanledreiy6eaoy Raaa+y1641W. btathStteu Itthaloe.sr~rseer m taro baa a eft dw,• b vML.wti~ •..,aa. FMtepmeord.•IaEamalaa Aos•a4atada,tatlhradahv trmaotbetiunoyeA,adidse ate iaO9tr4wto p~ d }I do P" !edit M Imae bat aetve DM. bapema asaa atPehrd b M f~ve/ararM site ote+ ! LOaawlett der bwitemes tbu 98 'A 4 dbt6tat 6om terse To 6b at s t drlme dad deride m sere ft roam ad 020 be der omaaq sock 1 d"~"u" `se't 0 ow hob at a testae I= Wm void chose read m beaefb Aem to tilde erne adds and dafdadea brew`, 6wolopa+aa ad fit- ~cew aCm ~trelt mtf6m, It woam be at a oaeptd• ea Cll~ivmt tl1l Unit dve r91adrat krobol a0 boa ode djou m ftscx~r wwaaylpt¢ 'tm A I= mt~ ■ dftm bat Irve laaodys area amtad u be abyss rod *w#b emitwtw0aaaiew MUMLO TL FM study ptmpd o ourdyflashTeamr*ubyw d4•TM *oyPm wow pm- dv!q a DM vldelbdeQaoaratambaelb WWII It maysom.on is do mdmd ab vta.paadoa cmadv u pod" pu~q aw e bove rob t ttopm I PAN boys ea ywwted b u m a very- art thexidaq sale ha U aC eat Pam ar dmilwooampm low hodwIty At tbe liqw is' to ft sucks DWkwT bdow ~b whoa erased. lowoft nIudv*6ram$& maea• aommad4' rest level, P06W Is dr)w Bad Fat" wbo wotbi u d a 2010 a tryaed,• dhyoe; or In I Joe oaaty Aat Is f 1 1 i y 4 1 1 2969L RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, SUPPORTING THE EXPANSION OF DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. WHEREAS, the Dallas/Fort Worth international Airport has had substantially positive impact of the total economy of the North Texas region from its opening in 1974 to the present time= and WHEREASr that very positive economic impact has been created in North Texas because of the outstanding service to the air trav- sling public of the airlines which serve the airport and the effi- cient operation of the airport and its support facilities managed by the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport staffs and i WHEREAS, the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board has j determined that adjustments to the original Dallas/Fort Worth Airport Master Plan in the form of the construction of additional runways, runway extensions, additional air carrier terminal facil- ities and roadway improvements will be necessary to maintain the current level of operating efficiency and, au the same time, permit additional expansions of air carrier service; and WHEREAS, the planned improvements to the Dallas/Fort Worth j International Airport will create an immediate economic impact resulting from 1.5 billion dollars in construction activity, in- creased direct aviation-related employment on the airport and, J most importantly, the support system absolutely essential for the 11 Dallao/Fort Worth International Airport to continue to function as j the most important economic growth accelerator in North Texas for { the foreseeable future; and WHEREAS, the Dallas/Fort Worth Airport is a critical factor in the development of economic opportunities for all oitizens of the Dallas/tort Worth Metroplex and for future generations NOW, THEREFORE, l t THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION I. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, 1 here y Wholeheartedly endorses the necessary and practical changes to the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Master Plan as ap- proved by the Dallas/Fort Worth international Airport Board. SECTION 11. That the City Council of the City of Denton, \..i Texaip i of the membership d improv planno ments corporations speak out in f at the earliest data possible. , E Mal ~f .M o ' E SECTION III. That the City Council hereby supports rapid completion o the required Environmental impact Studies and be- ginning of construction of the planned improvements at the ear- liest date possible, SECTION IV, That the City Secretary is hereby directed to €orwar o c al copies of this resolution to each member of the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Hoard, the executive staff 'of the airport, the regional office of the Federal Aviation Admin- istration and the office of each air carrier serving Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. i SECTION V, That this ordinance shall become effective immedi- ately upon its passage and approval, PASSED ANJ APPROVED this the day of 1990. B 5B C ST EBERR a MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERSi CITY SECRETARY 1 BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM! DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY t BYs LLa i ~ i PAGE 2 I ' F rr, CITY COUNCIL i 111:71:11: .4- i f f 1 f I f E l! 7! .1 f t 1 I' i i 4 9 Ilk i d ' O 3 4r ,4~0~ I t. i i I f 7,y -&51L-1/36B4 r.r n,e NO. fITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT AN OMA NANCE ACCEPTING COMPS FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; 'fHE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING PROVIDING FOR I FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS tile City has solicited, received and tabulated oompetitiv I meat, supplies or services in accordai.e with the procedures o state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee ties ppliestor rev mme bid lowestedesponsible bidsdforhathe materiels,dequipment, sus sees as shown in the "Bid Proposals submitted therafot; and servicrvic P for WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City udgot the the appropriation of funds l+es or services approved and accepted materials, equipment, eupp herein; NOW, THEREFORE, 111E COUNCIL OF THE Ci1'Y OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the numbered items or the f eaowig numbered in the ng 3 bidb~marerials, equipment, eupp i "Bid Proposals" on file in the Office of the City's Purchasiare hereby acceptedcs~ diapprovedhas bbeinguther lowest nresponsible ~ bide 1 for such items: BID AMiOUNT ITEM VENDOR - tiUMBE BER, NO. , 86. 00 1116 ALL EACLE SPECLAL'1'7< BBU9k1 -O2 LU6A COURIER (}88,200.00 3O ALL 1L - 1131 ALL ~1BM _f}21,200.00 f X26,054.00 1133- ALL _ PRI6STBR SUPFLi { i v 1 i SlC1'lUN 11. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numb eoe-7c-items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Rid Proposals, and related documents. SECTION ICI. That should the City and persons submitting apprnved nnl`"accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to i enter into a formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance., approval, and awarding of tie bids the City Manager or his designnted representative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that j the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained in the Rid Proposal and related bid documents herein approved and accepted. SECTION 1V. That by the acceptance and ap roval of the above numb ered-3remo of the subm11:ted bids the Cfty Council hereby Authorizes the expenditure oc funds thereior in the amount and in accordance with the a proved bids or pursuant to a written contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective imme a e y upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of $1990. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR a ATTEST: )M; V Ekt GMEH-O M YMUTR~ 11 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORA: DEBRA ADAMI URAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: . PAGE TWO 1 r..n..taa~aa.y~ I 26j 1 DATE: August 21,1990 f+ CITY COUNCIL REPORT c T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT. BID 01116 - STREET SWEEPER RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specification, Eagle Specialty Brush, in the amount of $92,586.00. SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of a vacuum type street sweeper. The unit recommended is a Johnson Sweeper mounted on a Ford Chassis. It will replace a Ravo Sweeper that is no longer economical to repair. The old unit has major mechanical problems and is badly worn. As of today $75,039.00, has been spent on maintenance for the 1986 Model Ravo Sweeper. It is currently out of service and will require an estimated $120000.00 in engine and transmission work to become operable. It is our intent to list it for sale at the next Surplus Auction schedule for September 18, 1990. The bid offered by STM Equipment is for an Elgin Whirlwind { Sweeper. It fails to meet the requirement of an in-dash factory installed air conditioner. The unit they offered is a roof mounted unit making the entire sweeper too tali and exposing the air conditioner to tree limbs and other obstacles. By design and intent, a sweeper operates along curbside. Denton has many attractive treelined streets that would not be accessible with the roof mounted air conditioner. Due to heat, noise, and dusty conditions, an air conditioner cab is essential to the efficient operation of any street sweeper and greatly contributes to the health and safety of the operator. ti Due to the few dollars difference in the two units meeting i specification a very complete evaluation was preformed. The Johnson Sweeper offers a superior warranty, increase fuel efficiency, on site repairs, engine compartment sealed from i swoeping area, stainless steel water systems and several other ite:,s listed as options on other machines are standard equipment it on the Johnson Sweepter. BACKGROUND:Tabulation Sheet (See tab sheet for list of adders and I deducts I sled on bids to make machines basically equal for evaluation process). I I I ~ • e., v,.v -a.~,JaWnRiS.4[J ..++.V~Ra2,W'0~ 1 I I r I Z a4• Fri CITY COUNCIL REPORT fr:..r. August 21, 1990 Page 2 of 2 PR0GRAKS DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTEDi Fleet Operation Department, Drainage Section of Community Service Department of Utility Division. FISCAL IMPACTt Funds for the purchase of this unit will come from. Certificates of obligation previously approved by Council for the purpose of purchasing Motorpool Equipment. Respectfully submitted L1 V. Harrell City Manager Prepared bya ++I Names Tom'D. S Haw, Titles Purchasing Agent { TS/jh J 032.DOC . ~ PJ ~ ~ 1 1 i 1 11 1 rl 1 . i I , . ..._.vn- r rr r .a ♦.a. w4.u.ArbWM WwJ1Y 1 i S Fri r n to " - - ~ - n o a td - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - u u ----z--1------- ycr H a (~I+~ ,~Hd £ > zU H [tl H M O b0 y H N s y tb to H tr3 z - o~ ~ O z z z x z•°~~ n 1~1 0 n nLn co 0 00 ' o 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I N w r o~ o. w + + + 0 C 00 0 H z N z % 1% Ch N K A Ch O i 90 a n a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r EN 0 * e y t~n ty co r1 A 0 n o 0% y~+ o ° ° o ~rHG t,1 ` f Vl O O o O O O O O - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - m to io • z x x x z HN ` av o n n n n n c ~ roz vi op o I~ O O j 1 r I DATES August 21,1990 I CITY COUNCIL REPORT TOs Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM= Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: RFP ##1130 - CRT'S, CONTROLLER, PRINTER SYSTEM RECOMMF.NDATIONs we recommend this RFP be awarded to the lowest and most responsible bidder IDEA COURIER for the CRT'S and Controllers in the amount of $61,575.00 purchase price funded over a 60 month payout period for total cost of $88,200.00. We are also recommending the outright purchase oft (3) Slave printers ate $385.50 (1) 18 part remote controller ats $6,030.75 (1) 9345 400 LPM Printer att $7,020.00 TOTAL 14,207.25 lull The Data Processing Advisory Board recommends approval. SUMMARY: This request was for proposals to replace the obsolete CRT S, controllers and printers connected to the IBM 4381 consisted of prices and suggested mainErame The proposal replacements for 56 terminals 4 controllers, 7 printers, and E conversion of 2 other controllers. BACKGROUND: Comparison of the two responses IDEA Courier and IBM Exert yrom Data Processing Advisory Board Agenda Packet (Item j j PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT' OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Information Services, all other dlepartments of the City of Dents-i. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this purchase will come from budget 1 funds or purchase of Data Processing Equipment: 1. (3) Slave printers 100-040-0022-9103 $10156.50 2. 18 part remote controller 100-036-0017-9103 $6,030.75 3. 9345 400 LPM Printer 710-043-0582-9103 $7,020.00 4. CRT's, controller and printer system Lease/Purchase Account 100-036-0017-8509 $88,200.00 , I i f l r CITY COUNCIL REPORT i AUGUST 21, 1990 PAGE 2 of 2 Respectfully submittedt 4 i 4yMVa Cit nager Prepared Lys Names Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Titles Purchasing Agent i Ts/jh f 048.DOC + 1 j . _j . 1 a i } I6PLACESENT EQUIPMENT ONfi TOTAL CURB EQUIP CURB EQUIP IDEA COURIER SIO UNIT TOTAL MONTHLY NONTBLI 1ST TR III It 11R 6 TR ITEM OT PRICE PUICHASI RAINT LEASE TOT COST MAIN? TOT COST RAINT COT NOlIOCNR0M8 TERNINALS 1 10 19630 14,815.00 1.00 706.00 It460.00 1,365.10 50000.00 51,010.31 11 PORT IENOIB CONTROLLER 11 1 3,111.00 3,331.00 15.50 68.11 111.64 940.80 1,111-10 S'liml 3S PORT RENOIR CONTROLLER it 1 10,110.16 10,110.15 11.10 109.19 1,111.41 1,501,10 11,151.16 1,11!,30 36 PORT LOCAL CONTROLLER It 1 111151.15 11,150.15 11.10 141.38 1,9fiB-1! 11619.10 16,141.10 16,501.17 11001-P HAVE PRINTER It 3 385.50 1,156.50 1150 11.91 111.11 ' ' 911.11 ' 11511.10 "1.105.11. TOTALS 56 16,611.50 61$15.00 66.30 11,054.11 14,1`5,11 81,100.00 12,011.11 t ! YEAR WARRANT` It 1 TSAR WARRANTY ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT OUT IBRI PURCHASR UNIT TOTAL IDEA COUIIRN BID ITEM QTI PACE PURCNASI 13001.1 SLAVE PRINTER u } 185.50 1,156.50 It PORT ABNOTE CONTROLLER H 1 61011.15 6,030.15 1315 100 LPN PRINTER It1 1 7,010.00 1,010.00 6 11,43615 11,101.15 tt l T811 NAIRANTP 111 1 NONIP 4AIRANTT rse:e::asaaasaa:r.:a::e:asasa:::asar.:::::eass::aaaass:assn:::asssmsaaaa:as::a:aaasssarsxElio assa:nesa REPLACIMBNT EQUIPMENT UNIT TOTAL CURB EQUIP CURB IQUIP IBM BID UNIT TOTAL NONTILY 10NTNL1 IS? It 117 71 111 1 11 11111 ill PRICE PURCIASI NAINI LOASR 101 COSt SAINT TOT CORt SAINT CIT i NONOCIROMI TERMINALS $411 61 HIM 60,511.00 1110 1,p+1.81 11,18!,11 10365.10 11,11619 11,010.16 PORT 189011 CONIROL68t ill 1 S,I11,00 11111.00 11111 1611 115.49 110.10 41611.41 5,111.11 E 31 PORT LOCATE CONTROLLER 111 1 {1,111.00 If.46 111.55 1,634,10 1,501.11 11,11631 1,111.10 17100 11. • = 71 PORT LOCAL COITR44LB1 11L 1 11,501,10 13,501.00 11.14 116.66 1,401.15 I,SSl.10 110160.41 11,601.11 1114 TERMINAL POINTER 6 3,115.60 16,135.00 30,00 31t.i1 41153.11 111.11 11,115,11 51106.11 I 11 11,195,00 14,515.00 80.351,0!1.11 14,15614 14,165.11 115,111.01 111013.15 ALL MIS NAVE A 1 IRAN WARRANTY 100TILI DIIPBIINCE 1$1.11 111114 I ADDII100AL 4001PHIT DUt 11091 PURCIAS6 Ill Ill UI11 TOTAL ITEM QTY PRICE PUICNAII DISPLAT VIA" RD PRI1T11 1 111.00 1,111.00 1114 (10 LPN 1111TEl { 1,111.00 1,111.00 if PORT IRIOII Commit 1 1,121,00 61119,00 y 11,453.00. 11.311.00. , . ..,:..o s,wI•nw a4Ya!.Y,Yielwd➢~ 1 jj r DACKGROUND INFORMATION for Item 6 Most of the CRTs, Printers and Controllers are from 6 to 9 years old. Especially in the case of the printers the failure rate is becoming more frequent and our maintenance costs have been escalating at approximately 10 percent per year. Due to new technology and reliability some of the manufactures are now offering 3 year warranties on the CRTs. With these factors in mind we sent out an RFP to the vendors for new CRTs, Printers and Controllers. The attached analysis shows the cost breakdown between the twc vendors that responded and the overall cost allocation over a 6 year period with the assumption that the replacement equipment would be placed on a 6 year lease purchase agreement. The lowest bid on this equipment was from Idea Courier. With their proposal we could replace all of the listed equipment for increased cost of $18.44 per month over what we would pay for maintenance on the current equipment over the next 6 years. This additional monthly cost of $18.44 seems to be a very small price to pay when we can replace old equipment with new equipment with better technology. Additionally there exists a need for additional equipment that has been budgeted in various departments budgets. Again the low bidder on the new equipment was Idea Courier. The attached cost analysis shows the difference between the two vendors responding to the RFP, i J: ~ I I 0 I r~ DATEt August 21,1990 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: RFP #1131 - MAINTENANCE OF PC'S AND RELATED EQUIPMENT I RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this proposal be awarded to IBM in the amount of $21,200.00 The Data Processing Advisory Board recommends approval. SUMMARYs This proposals for the annual contract for the on site maintenance of all PC's, monitors, and related equipment in the i City of Denton. Currently 62 personal computers with monitors 4 3! will be covered under this contract. The price offered by IBM is I based on their MRSA Maintenance Pricing. This gives us a 5 year maintenance and is only available for PC's to those customers with a mainframe MRSA agreement in place. This agreement extends discounts of 20 to 308 off of the normal maintenance cost quoted by I.A.M. BACKGROUND: Exert from Data Processing Advisory Board Agenda Packet (item 441, Proposal Cover Letter, Equipment List, MRSA Maintenance Pricing. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: All departments in the C ty of Denton. j FISCAL IMPACTt Funds for this service will come from budget funds ret a"e` y- the various departments for maintenance of office equipment. Each department paying for the machines assigned to that department. Resp ctfully submittedt t U j Dy V. Harrel City Manager Prepared bye Names Va D. Shaw, C,p,M, Titles Purchasing Agent TS/jh 049.DOC ,r r. r.. I:.;u n rvn 4op ti M M!':tidMAY'MU`~.y MAI . I Fri BACKGROUND INFORMATION for Item 4 C r Over the past 6 years the City of Denton has acquired approximately 62 personal computers of various models. At the last DP Advisory Board meeting the motion to recommend a maintenance contract for e second. At the time board these PCs died due to a lack of discuss the possibility of having the information Services Department assumed the responsibility for maintaining and repairing these PCs or- going on a time and material basis for repair. At that time I explained to the board that I had requested a PC Analyst position in the current year budget and that position was denied. Therefore I did not have the staff, expertise, or parts inventory to adequately provide this service to the other departments. Again this year I requested a PC Analyst position and again this year it has been denied. Since the last board meeting the City has placed 4 FCs on maintenance contract due to the critical nature of the work performed on these machines or due to the PC becoming in operable and the time and material basis was much more expensive than the maintenance contract. In analysing our situation, I feel that the maintenance contract has the least impact on the various departments' budgets since it is a fixed cost once a year and the departments can plan for this expense. Due to the tight budget conditions that the City has been experiencing in the last few years it has become very difficult for managers to find funds for unexpected expenses. I feel that maintenance contracts on this equipment are very similar to insurance policies and g;ve the City a protection from unexpected costs and/or the nonuse of piece of equipment that has become an essential part of our operations. ; J I . r I 1 F nr. 'l PROPOSAL COVER LETTER The offerer proposes to provide on-site maintenance for the PCs Identified in Attachment A belonging to the City of Denton. Equipment will be covered between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. five days per week Monday through Friday in accordance with the specifications provided In the REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL date 7/24/90 , and E further agrees to bind himself/herself on acceptance of his/her propose by the ty to execute a Contract for service specified thareln. Total lump sum price for this Contract (as shown on the Proposal Price Summary) shall be written In words and numbers In the place provided belowt TOTAL LUMP SUM CONTRACT PRICE: Twenty-one thousand one hundred and twenty DOLLARS AND NO CENTS 0_21 L1_20, QQ* I COMPANY NAME OF UFFERERt IBM Corporation SIGNED BYt Linda M. Sanders ~s'✓~""~" TITLEt Marketing Manager ADDRESS: 15(x3 LBJ Freeway CITY, STATE, ZIP: Dallas, TX 75234 j TELEPHONE NUMBER: 214-888-4000 UATEi 7/24/90 I a Price is stated including warranted items. Price without warranted items would be $16,599.00 k I 2129k J - F1 fYC7 1 _ I O C fJ W W V W li V W~ V fJ fJ A~ f.~ fJ r r O V Y y g N+ W N fI O Y p Mp •N. OI N O W p N ,N. eOv~ lQQO O. y q N J• W N O W C. J q N i• W N► 1 j)} rf~J q r r .7 c} y g ~ r ~ ~ M M ~ N ~ .y ~ m ~ ° ~ '1.1 ~~i s c1 $ bra ~r°e i p N ~ ~ es~~~~~f~•wo'o~rn`'r rrrr rn ~ It°t it t n t'1i ~ `i b ~ ie i -3 H ~ I~_,~•,1 r~~ •~q~y /~~1 1~~•p1 It S N N}f~q ~~ypp ~ 11111 • R ~ A r-H!J ~ ~ M P! p^0 ~ r yyyy.i~f ~~p! O M y~ yy ~ H Q f'~ ~If 1 ~Gy 9 l~,ryy[ Gy fA yt ffplr.~J p~ y I~qy ~1p ,Yy~ IN ~ h•1 ~ H yM yH yI-i ^^+1 y~ 19 I••1 ~ ~ N ~ /11 ~ ~ ~ Yj ~ Y i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° Y ~ N ! ~ Y •V ~ H !ef N M V .J Y ~ 11FF^~ M „I~~iii N r ee YN 1 ° tCC' own .~oa '`j 1O s~"s oLia f~w^i e~~Fs:`~rn` 8~wf fyCo .~i = s i+ F P p, ' ~ ` ~r ' Fr n fa ea r r r n b i_ C. I ° I 1 ~~a••~~~~a~xsa~~s~~xat~a~~~~a~xxxarasx~xxx~x~~~xx~ N N N N N N fJ N N N N N N N N f•f fK ► W W W f.[ W li W li u W W W u u W W li N . 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 y `i N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N fJ fJ N 1 17 W W V W W W V W W W V V ffJJ y J J V J V J V V J V J J V J V V V ~ I O~ 0 0 0 0 0 e s 0 0 0 s lw p O p O s O O O O O e O O O o e Q i• O ; ' N fJ N fJ N N N N N N H IM , ° r1 Y fl. Y s Y s Ow 4 , P1 g q q q q q q fIl q ~ I 1. Y Y Y O. Y M Y M M Y Y O y y V, U U N M N U N M N N N N U N N N M V lw U Yw U Iw 1 Y1 N M N N N N N U N N N N N ~ N N N N N N N N N N i N N N N N N N N N P+ 1 W V N g q q V V V ~ ~ ,Vi ,Vw V J ~ V J~ V y ~ y i 'Vu ~ N In N 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e O p O O N P 0 01 W W W 1+ V H H O Q e l 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1pp 1 1 1 • 1 uar~r~wrstsr~ar~NNNOOOP%m101IO1I01 H r H H r♦ q q q N N j~ I N J N y y y V •J N V J N N N U y y fi N O O O O P ~ O O O O O O O O O O O 0 1 {J O L/ .•n LI !I f. Y W ~ N O O ~ O O y O O~ O O O e O O 4 M ~P N I 1 I i+ 1 0 0 0 e O 1 1 1 1 , q q q y y .i l0 q H M q g Y V N N M W I G M• O V J M M q O ,fI H O O ` 0 0~ W ✓r N O O y N O O fl. W w W W J• M Y N q W r-, N O~ Ir M Y i fJ V O M i• W W U V N W H, q W q J N V J IO y N ~ N i• W H 1 O N ~I q~ i q fy O N q W 1+ W Jr J'• ` q O ~ l1 P N N V O W •I N V M ± J O J fJ I = H Y io O J O N W l1 Y= O q N O q V fI U ~i W N U Y, L• ftl N u O W W H I 11. ~ ~~~III O .ul J q q N q O N N U N V1 N N N M N N N N 4l l/1 l.•1 y I/I O O w V W g V r• M O N N N N N fJ N N N N N N N N N N Al ~ I S Y N J N V lI N S V, 1. q~ V y y •-f ,V+ ~ ,J•, •-l y= V M _Y. u y 'V' \w In ll, 1 O 1 ~ Fl V V° O° H u H i~~ V r i V p r N Jq. a H aqi r aq. N N U ~ }q. a l w 1 Y ~ 11~y ~f11If ~`I Y y~ $j! N ~ ~ N .°Ni M M Y, ~ •N., YN+ V ~ M M M M yNy (.yNf yN V yN Ny yN IJ J y r N N yN Ny yN N V V l1 ~ in 1 W W Y N W W W Wf•f W {N~ {N~ N N ~ W Af N N fNf lN~ tNf N N N N (N~ ~Ny {N'~ ryN ~Ny N ~N~1 fN~ if~ll 1f~~ f•1 1~~y , .Q~pi ,{pe}w S8 0 S S S ~ ~QX ~ O !O~ O ~ (~O~i {pQi .V+ P tO+ 6 eO+ Mg fc~ 11~ f!a!~ 11. IY ft f~. w A S ^ A 00. w w 11. Moo RENEE A F A .0,1 p ff 1 p 1 o p:le=O V 011 oO0 $ r~-I H.d-I r°-.r OOJJ eY y eNf0 o W OIw11 o11r 1••, 1w H 1••1 M H 99=W99 M 1•w n•1M H !a p 1•H N N N N N ! W N N q~[ V nt ♦ N y y J y J V N y N J y y r~ N y y N N V y V y V ; yy yy ~ fyyJ J• N q yN Ny Yy'1 ,N. M yN .MJ Uy yN N N• N N M N N U N .yw 11 N~ A. ~ y 1,~, ~ Y~~ u~ Y ~ N N fJ 1,/ N N N N N M N N N~ N N N N N q~ q 1 I M V y f V V ! V V N M1! O ~ 4~ a ~ r=~ y W ~A{r~f g 1 q f 1 1 ~1.f fIy f1J 1y1 1yI f1J ~I.I fJ1 ff.f f1J f1J f1,f J f1 fIJ (1 J 11J W 6 f11 M W a J w V• J q u fY. y Y iS r 101 r`i N VI W W lJ W 41 ~i W lIi N LI W lJ u 1J lJ 100 i+ 0 Y Ir+W f 1 l1 lNI V V O N S W O O N S Y 0 S V 10i + J O p V w 1j a1 l N V N ff11.f Y W N V g t Y Y ,p q Y i M { ^ I O N W l•f J q~ 6 N Y J N Y W V W r i W(i a a q O Y 11,, 0,,1I U W J N qW(~ 0 0 W O O M W 0kc OIbbW wO W00 w~~~ f w 0' ~ If i S ! S ! ! ! ! ! 7 CA Ql P to VI b b N b Kl ! ! ! ! N b S ! 7 ! 7 ! N O+ 00 V g gS$gS$$$g gg o~c~cQi 7 i , I J11 q yl yl M N N N N N N N N t i i i i i i t 1 ~O pN O Yi pYp y I~~y;y1 INQS iCQ qW yN 1qq~ O 4p1 QY H reQl N i QWQ N ~ 1 (L'~•A1J] Ir 1:' r s ♦ Ny ~H1 py r~~J py pp~ • IV r-1 M M 1-1 r-1 M Y-1 M r I-• I-I ~ M 11 •-I M IJC M N I d f~ I r• ~ H ry YnY /r'1 H .~-1 H •r•-I W •"1 M M N M O C I •1 a 4 N u 1 1 1 I I 1 cs~~p~i ~C^ ..~i►~~ ~ro~O • o gill I i I 's a IC IIL' N N r N i V N N tl f1 ieN V g. s, 0 r Arv~ PAM i FI n fY A►'I fSSP1R 1 n L7' M< tl 00 1Rp : Iryy 1~~ ~pp7a, W a Nam Yi IP ~ N N N fJ "am" N N N N N N N N N N N fJ N N N N Qr 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 11 I~ I HI b w b r r Y r r b w r P fJl IM N N V• N W W W 1 A Q O O O O S O O O O O O O S O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 00 Y. ~ OI W 1"I ~ N N N N L~ S ; j o ~ }fir laj C w a /1 K K 9 F+ F R r w w I Y r Y r r r r r Y r r r r r w m r r np C1 9 M YI Y• N N N N N N N WI N N N N YI IA U• YI JA VI 1 f yyy1111YYYYYYp~~~ ~ w r m w m r Y Y Y Y Y w Y II N N N Ya Y• V W W 1 1 •+Ic n r+, ~~~~~.~~~~~"~.~blibovodee=dd` ~ 1 M A J.I^°.'~. 1Jl9t7 I S3 ~ jy■, 1y~. N Irr. V Y(~~1 VJ V . .J y y ~ . . ~✓y V INy 1y I.I I.~ ~ 1y S1 Y 4 N M N N O 1111 N 1 N N N N 1W ~ LJ N W L lJ l~ N a U l~ I ~4y~ vi 01 w M {Ylh VU11 w 11 Y f11 II ~ VN1 Il 10 y ,I .J y Y y ti I N K d 0 M N ~J M S sit Y S` i} O d O d IAi1 r}~y 1y~~ ~1 11 y e ~ NJ d 1J y II W l/I S m Y W 01 N N ~ I N 0 4. V• N M 22 N ii b Y N N i i W ~ /yr ~~If1 I~+a Y~ r ~ N O S O l~ N 11~~ j III • n n N i W N N M N N N W l~ ~ N i N o N i i N N y u 11. V r A i i i i i t i i i N N V 1911 Iflol Ron go Hsi I ' Yf~ Y r Y r ~~YY Y w YY r r w Y r Iu r r r m M M N N N M d N 1h N N M N N N N N N N N <A lM r 4 Y M W I.J Y Y I• ~ Y 4 t V l~.I Y V 1J V N Y Y j./ • ~ 9888 $ $g'$8»$~' $g88$ Z w i ~ ~~ssss~s~sssssss~sssss~~ ~ w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w n I`-1 r d Ia,7~mi I~~r$ 1Yi rrI'-1 r' ,r~7rnl ..~7rj. rdn '.~dr Jr-1 d m :.~VS]I d .~yd-S~. H d 1dr i i yW NM~~1Y w 1yy► w~ U l.A r i WW1 V N W U 1 ± N V y F. M1 M H fJ L 2W 10• i N IA N •.I N m N N 1 •M tt r ` f ` A L 8 8 8 8 8 8~~ rr~ ao.~ ar r N .,,b, 000 00 0 00 0 i; 888 888 88 8 8 1 i ~M'n.{Yd .r•Fi.. r. xi. iv r.1 r ii r _r ..a... .....1'#1L...I df p.p• r ~ I l~ l I i r `I 5F I CITY OF DENTON MRSA MAINTENANCE PRICING Annual Maintenance Prices (5-Year MRSA) IBM ONLY OFFERS 24 HOUR, 365 DAY/YEAR MAINTENANCE Dept/or Machine Display Item Maint. Discount Price 1 5150 1 168.00 308 117.60 5151 1 50.00 221 39.00- Item 12 same as Item 11. 5150 3 168.00 301 117.60 5153 3 62.00 221 48.36 5271-002 12 430.00 271 315.90 5272 12 94.00 221 73.32 Items 18-19 same as Item 112. 5271-006 4 629.00 27% 459.14 5272 4 94.00 221 73.32 Items 5-11, 13-170 & 20 same as Item 14. 5273-061 23 546.00 221 425.88 5151 23 50.00 221 39.00 5273-062 21 546.00 221 425.88 5272 21 94.00 221 73.32 Item 22 same as Item 121. 5160-086 25 475.00 271 346.75 5151 25 50.00 221 39.00 i Item 126 same as Item 125. 5160-086 24 475.00 27% 346.75 5153 24 62.00 221 48.36 1 8525-004 - 27 110.00 221 85.80 j 8530-021 28 190.00 221 146.20 I 8512 28 25.00 201 20.00 Items 29-30 same as Item 128. 8530-E21 32 190.00 221 148.20 8413 32 25.00 201 20.00 Items 33-38, E 42-43 same as Item 132. . I i ~ I ~ 1~ FF 1I S Dept/or Machine D18P1al Item Maint. Discount Price 8530-E21 31 190.00 22% 148.20 8512 31 25.00 20% 20.00 Item 1141 same as Item 131. 8530-E31 39 190.00 22% 148.20 8513 39 25.00 20% 20.00 Item 140 same as Item 139. 8550-061 44 220.00 22% 171.20 %wade 8512 44 25.00 20% 20.00 8550-61 45 220.00 22% 171.60 8513 45 25.00 20% 20.00 Items 46-47 same as Item 145. 48 260.00 22% 202.80 1 8555-061 8513 48 25.00 20% 20.00 8560-071 49 345.00 22% 269.00 8513 50 25.00 20% 20.00 8580-111 50 500.00 220 390.00 8513 50 25.00 20% 20.00 Items 52-531 & 56-62 same as Item 150. 1 8580-111 51 500.00 22% 390.00 8514 51 48.00 203 38.40 Items 54-55, are priced same as item 151. .f ii E E f 1 1 E 1 Ff 7 1 s DATE: August 21, 1990 CITY COUNCIL REPORT f T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager k SUBJECT2 BID #1133 - PADMOUNTED CAPACITOR BANKS RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid he awarded to the low bidder, Prieater Supply, in the total am, nt of $26,054,00. SUMMARY: This bid is for padmounted capacitor banks to be used n t ree locations in the Electrical Distribution Systems, Oak Street, San Jacinto Blvd., and in Southridge. Once installed these capacitor banks will improve the power factor of those circuits, BACKGROUVD: Tabulation Sheet, Memorandum from Don McLaughlin. 4 PROGRAbIS DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Distribution Div son. FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted Funds Account #612-008-0252-9217. Z.Respe ully submitteds Harrel s City Manager y; Prepared by: Names Denise Mann n Title: Senior Buyer Approved Name: Tom D. 9 aw Title: Purchasing Agent „ 4 DM/jh 039.DOC I r' 00 F FF BID 1 1133 1 1 1 ! 1 1 I I I I I ' I ! I I i BID NAME PM CAPACITOR BANK lRELSON ELECIRICI CUMMINS ! DDDM I CO. I TEMPLE IPRIESTER SUPPLY! I I I I I 1 I I 1 4 OPEN DATE JULY 31, 1991 1 1 ! I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I ACCOUNT I I I I I I I I............... I............... I............... I- I............... I 1 I DTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR l ..I.....I 1..__...........I............... 1 1 I 1 i I 1 1 I I I 1 I' % { I I I I I I 1 . j 1 1 2 1 611 KVAR I NO BID I NO BID 1 $81321.ll EA 1 $1,051.11 EA I $61133.11 EA 1 - I I I I I I I I f 2 1 1 1 1221 KVAR I NO BID 1 NO BID 1 811,378.11 EA I 111,451.11 EA 115,9/8.11 EA I I I I I I I t 3 1 1 MPS I NO BID I NO BID I MALION I K I M ELECT. I SMALLIETTER I I l I I I I 1 1 4 1 ! DELIVERY I NO BID i NO BID 1 84-N DAYS 1 10 DAYS ! 91 DAYS I 1 I I I I ! I ! I i I I ! I I I ! I I 1 1 I I I I ! I I I ! I I I I I I ! I I I E I I I I I' 1 1 1 I I I i I i ;i I i r 1` X ~ y 3 k1' 6 CITY ofDENTONMUNICIPAL UTILITIES / 801•ATexesStreet I Denton, 7X76201 M E M O R A N D U M TOs Denise Manning, Senior Buyer, Purchasing FROM: Donald L. McLaughlin, Electric Engineer Administrator DATEt August 3, 1990 SUBJECT% BID 01133 ___=====p==c=x-_o=nrrxrrr==rr=errrren=or_=a=s.=zxmaeczmxxxzsmsaxxx I, Award bid for the padmounted capacitor to the low bidder, Priester Supply. The prices were $8,053/ea for two 500 KVAR padmounted capacitor banks capable of being expanded to 1200 KVAR. and $9,948 for a 1200 KVAR padmounted capacitor bank for a total of $26,054. One 600 KVAR capacitor bank is to be part of the Oak Street overhead-to-underground conversion to replace existing overhead capacitor bank. The other .;00 KVAR capacitor bank will be located next to the Trammell Crow building on San Jacinto Boulevard to improve power factor on S-215. The 1200 KVAR i capacitor bank will be centrally located in Southridge to improve " power factor of the circuit serving Southridge. DLMtg 08030083 E i cot R. E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities E. B. Tullos, Director of Electric UtilitiesII E 1 i t ..w.,v _ .<rc...v..o n.. a^aia •xs eh a'LhJ4"L^ihl h. , I 3 MM' ` ~ t ~ CITY i COUNCIL i of o~ f to h 0 T{~ I j 2651L-3/3689 I i NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PRUVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City tins solicited received and tabulated 'ej competitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has received and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works or improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and plans and specifications therefore; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON tIEREBY ORDAINS: i SECTION I. That the following competitive bide for the construction oI public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid invitations", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City's Purchasing Agent filed according to the bid number assigned hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids: LID NuIHFR CONTRACTOR AMOUNT 81INHO:T COPH, $90,654.50 ; 11z~ tArnR P:tgir.c' rn~aTALCT1i1NCO, $3.90.x44.35 r - SECTION 11, That the acceptance and approval of the above competiliv'e Binh shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the bid for construction of such public works or person shall improvements n with 1eallnreqaccepted uirementsnspecified din the until i I i i 1, Y 11~ ~ r u4r to Bidders including the timely execution of P. written contract and furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notifi- cation of the award of the bid. k SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to j execute a1I necessary written contracts for the performance of the construction of the public works or improvements in accordance with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such contracts nre made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and Bid Proposals, and documents relating thereto specifying the { terms, conditions, plans and specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained therein. SECTION IV. That upon acceptance and approval of the above cotoffUive bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and improvements as authorized herein, the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized contracts executad pursuant thereto. ; f SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective immeiRaHly upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1990. ~ r • i i ~ BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ~ { ~r ATTEST: I JENNIFER WAUTER3 ; `MY 9ECRFMY i APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAM DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY ~ BY., i PAGE 2 y a♦hnAYMgwYC4J ~.NnR ti'Tilp 'v n..: ....q ' I II I DATE: August 2101990 aa. CITY COUNCIL REPORT r TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID#1128 - ALEXANDER DRAINAGE I I j RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the only bidder, Surmount Corp., in the amount of $90,654.50. SUMMARY: This bid is for construction of a drainage line for Alexander Street. Although Surmount Corp, was the only bidder the Engineering Division is comfortable that the price of their bid is in line with other projects. BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet, Memorandum from Jerry Clark. PROGRAMS, DEPARTY-,NT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Community Development Block Or ant an Dra Wage Interest Money. t FISCAL IMPACT: Grant Funds Account #219-052-CD48-8502 #219-005-CO23-8502 0219-052-CD30-8502 i 0219-052-CD42-8502 , Respectfully submitted: U L y V. Harreff7 Prepared byt City Manager I I i E Names Den ee Mann ng Title: Senior Buyer Approved: 1 Name: To D. Shaw, C.P.M. Titled Purchasing Agent DM/jh 042.DOC f 7 BID # 1128 I BID NAME ALEXANDER DRAINAGE i SUNMONT CORP. OPEN DATE JULY 31, .990 1 I ACCOUNT # { I QTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR _I I I I I 41 I I ""I I BASE SID $106,069.50 i ALTERNATE $90,654.50 ? I BOND f I ~ Yes j I I I I I I I , I j j I 1 ~ I I ! ' f I I ' i `I t -T _ owl n~ctni~u CITY Ur On f UN , 1990 SEP -8 P11 11; 01 C CITY of DENTON / 215 E. McKinney / Denton, Texas 76201 7 MEMORANDUM DATE: August 8, 1990 TO: Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent FROM., Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering & Transportation SUBJECT: Alexander Drainage - Bid #1128 The Engineering Division has reviewed the bid submitted by l Sunmount Corporation. The prices are rea3onable although not excellent. We recommend that the alternate, with a total of $90,654.50, be awarded. The funds for the project will come from the Community Development Block Grant ($78,000), and the remainder from drainage interest money 012,600). Sunmount is an excellent contractor and will complete the work quickly. We recommend award so this crucial project can get + underway at the earliest possible date, 'r er ar f i 0904E I , 1 r 1 k Fe 11li Fri, ~ Yt.".• DATES August 21,1990 CITY COUNCIL REPORT i TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID 41132 - WEST OAK STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder, Jagoe Public Construction Co. in the amount of $359,544.35. SUMMARY: This bid is for the construction of 8" asphalt paving, drainage and sidewalk on West Oak Street. The project runs from the intersection of West Oak and Borinie Brae to the intersection with 135. The sidewalk is located on the north side of this i portion of West Oak Street, BACKGROUIIU: Tabulation sheet, Memorandum date August 8, 1990 from Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering and Transportation PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Engineering and Transportation Department and citizens utilizing West Oak Street area. s ~ FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this project will come from 1985 Street Bond Account Number 434-002-SB85-8518-9105. ? + Resp fulllly s tted: L'lo d V. Harrell Pre aced bye City Manager 1 Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. 1 'title: Purchasing Agent TS/jh 041.DOC 1 I r ~ 1 I BID 1 1132 1 1 { 1 i 1 i t I I 3 1 BID NAME NEST OAK PAVING AND 12ABOE PUBLIC 1SUNMOUNT CORP. 1 APAC TEKAS 1 1 R V PAVING fALL-TE2 PAVING I DRAINAGE i I I I t I t i I 1 { OPEN DATE AUGUST T, 1994 I t { i I I ' ~ I I I t I { ACCOUNT 1 { 1 i t { { ° I---------------I-..__----- I- °-I- - I i DTY I ITEM°DESCAIPi1DN i VENDOR I VEN110b i VENDOR i VENDOR I VENDOR I I-----------i ii I -i I I i I I I { i 1 1 i SIDENALK i !17,541.41 i 121,535.41 i $16,694.11 1 $199245.11 1 $19,154.41 { i i 2 i 1 8' ASPHALT PAVING 1 $342,444.35 1 $354,536.53 t $372,625.71 i 1377,841.65 1 $392,168.5! 1 3 I I I 1 I t I I { TOTAL 1 $359,544.35 1 $3761171.53 t $389,315. C 1 $397,166.65 t 1411,211.54 1 IAt I SIDENALK i I i - I 1 $19,458.14 I 1 I i I 1 i i I j 2A1 i 6' CONCRETE PAVING I i i - i - i $412,866.51 1 I 1 i I I i i { I i TOTAL { I 1 - i i $421,915.31 1 t I I i I i t 1 i I i t 1 I i I i I { i I I - i i i i I I I t t t i I i I 1 i i i I i i I I I ~ ~ ~ I I I i i I { 1 . r t i RECEI'rF0 III CITY v UE11IC11 ~ PURCf Ir',51tt 1990 SEP -8 Pit 11• Q 1 I CITY of DENTON 1215 E. McKinney I Denton, Texas 76201 MEMORANDUM .4 1 I i DATE: August 81 1990 TO: Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent FROM: Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering & Transportation SUBJECT: West Oak Street Paving - Bid 1132 i (Bonnie Brae to 135) The Engineering Division has reviewed the bid from Jagoe Public and feel the prices are acceptable. The total bid is also below our estimate. Jagoe Public has done several City projects successfully. We recommend that they be awarded the bid with a total price of $359,544.35. This includes the street construction and a sidewalk along the north side. i o ~d r _ % 0904E c 'i i j i i 1 1 r I1 w 1 ;n MIT r i CITY COUNCIL i 1:11: am m 4+ Iy+ G I , t t p i i O I C r p t t O~ , coGGO~ 1 I~ i . . r ~ r .2516L-7/1589 i i NO. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES Olt SERVICES IN THE PURCHASESEFRONTIREQUIREMENTS IOF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING FOR LJ i ! AN EFFECTIVE. DATE. i W1iEREAS, state law and ordinance require that certain contracts requiring an expenditure or payment by the City in an amount exceeding $10,000 be by competitive bids, except in the case of public calamity where it becomes necessary to act at once to appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to preserve the property of the city, or it is necessary to protect the public health of the citizens of the city, or in case of unforeseen damage to public property, machinery or equipment; NOW, TIAF;REFORF., i THE COUNCIL OF THE. CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the City Council hereby determines that there is apu5rlc ccalamity that makes it necessary to act at once to appropriate money to relieve: the necessity of the citizens, health preserve the property of the city, or to protect t public of the citizens of the city, or to provide anfor d bni f rreaso see ndamageof, public property, machinery or equipment, materials, equipment ~ the following emergency purchases of supplies or services, as described in the "Purchase Orders attached hereto, are iereby approved: PURCHASE A}tOIRJT Er NUMBER VENDOR ORDR FASTF:gN E1 ACTRIC ~~9 a - 7 40.00 SECTION 11. That because of such emergency, the City Manager the or es gna~' red-. employee is hereby authorized to purchase materials, equipment, supplies or services as described in the payment therefore in the attached Purchase Orders and to make urchases being in amounts therein stated, such emergency p p accordance with provisions requirements osuch thefl competitivenbids. Purchases by the City f ~ I i i J ripf V l be F SECTION 111. That this ordinance ahall become effective immealate y upon its passage and approval. PASSEL) AND APPROVED this the day of ► 1990. BOB CASTLEB'•:RRY, MAYOR G f ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: j DEBRA ADAH DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY , BY: i V i E t S i~ i %,A { / t PAGE TWO E c f FF I I DATE: August 21,1990 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TOr Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #98813 - EASTERN ELECTRIC APPARATUS REPAIR CO. INC. - $98,740.00 RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this purchase order in the amount of 9~ 8,740.00, to Eastern Electric be approved. i f SUMMARYr Purchase Order 498813, is for the emergency repair of an Allia-Chalmers oil filled Transformer. This unit is a 69000 Delta to 13200 wye unit in the Hickory Street substation. The price inr.ludes unloading repairing testing and reloading of the 25 year old transformer. (See Eastern quote attached). Delivery is expected to be 16-18 weeks. i A new unit this size would cost approximately $425,000 dollars and delivery is in excess of one year. BACKGROUND: Purchase Order 98813, Eastern Quote #NFWR9668, Memorandum date August 9,1990, from Ernie Tullos. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENP OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Dietributionr Electric Utility Customers. i FISCAL IMPAC'T': Funds for this emergency repair will be from the Electric Meter & Substation Maintenance. Account # 610-080-0255-8332. Respectfully submitted: L1 d V. Harrell City Manager Prey&red by: \ i Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent TS/ih 043,DOC 1 1 s N r a ~ z ,~ro~m 40 g gill > p xZMa M m < QQD t F51 - w 0 0 a o Z ~ N PAW 5' 14 W b ~ C -1 ru> + rz M ~ M d ' p e 04 o w co co 1R w c yr 6m 0 N o pp B N ~ y p Co P O r co hco v 0 00 O 1 At,O. 8 '90 14108 0000 EASTERN ELECTRIC 1-817-584-1403 P. 2 7 Y Mys so WW f 1001 MM WAI MWM f C EM AVM at 111!101401 August 8, 1850 j i j City of Denton 1701 A Spencer Road Denton, Texas 76206 Attentions Ray Wells Subject: Request for quotation on repairing Allio-Chalmere oil filled transformer - 69000 Delta to 13200 WYE, 12-16-20 MVA Referenco: My NoPotatlon No.ONFWR 9666 Gentlemen: We are pleased to offer our proposal for the repair of subject transformer. WORK SCOPE 1. Unload unit from cuetomere transportation, perform + preliminary teats and inspoctione. 2. Unload suparately shipped bushing and inspect. 3. Disconnect 011y side buohinao, remove cover and untank. r; 4. Joint inspection of traneforoa r domegu. 6. Photomrapho of unit so found aftor unbankinll. J 6. Remove head Frew and auperotructurel unstuck top core irons remove coils for complete inepsotlcn, Rovlew and advise of dawaae and take photographs. 7. Clean and momser core, revtow and evaluato core damage, if any is found, Repairs would be priced no additional for custumer's approval. A. Perform computor analYSio of existirna design and eompnro to prueent standurdo required for improvlnR whort circuit wlthotand capabilities. Denixii chanpse will bo submitted for custue,er review. IWARAM Aug. B '90 141 09 0000 EASTERN ELECTRIC 1-817-1589-14015 P. 3 City of Denton Page Two ~ ^ 111 J S. All tranoformer designs will also be computer anulyzed for implueb voltage distribution to verify that the original design will moot present day atandards. This (analysis gives the customer the opportunity to indontif y original docian deficiencies with our recommendations s for upgradeina. j 10. All appropriato material associated with redesigned cells and redeslgned braving will be new. II 11. We will prnvide loss reduction options after performing - our redesign engineering unalysia. These options will be priced as additional and submitted for your approval prior to prooe&ding. 12. Complete minor inspection of load tap changing equipment to inoluda: a. Draining. opening and flushing with the oil tap changer oompartmont. b. Visual examination of moving and fixed mechical parts, suoh am shaft seals. bevel gears, stationary and moving contacts, oto. c. Tightness check on bolts, locking keys. pins. eLu. d. Mechanical operation with the use of tha hand orank 1 through all postions to check for binding. e. Furnish and install now tap changer door mabkets as neodod, 13. insnecL all gauges and accesaorles for proper operation, Inspect and clean bushings and all C.T. In within the tank and all other auxiliary windinne within the tank will be throus:hly flushed, oleanod, dried and tasted. For LTC 1 a trahafermero, this will include the &Yrivo trensforwer and the Provonblve auto transforwer. 34. iiowind all low voltage, regulating voltage 8 high voltage coils. 14 1 1 s ~ 1 , eai nv .w"s~...N a .4: LalnVt.Y' 1 11 Aug. a '90 14809 0000 EASTERN ELECTRIC 1-Bt7-•SB9-1806 P. 4 CitY of Denton Paso Three I i r 1J f~( v IS. Hydraulic leveling and dry leveling of all coils to equal height of radial spacer columns. 16. Process all coils through drying oven while maintainlnll axial pressure on the coils. This process removes moisture { and further sizes the 001113 to designed dimensions. 17. Final sizing pressure applied and hold until tolls are loaded on the core. 18. Reproeeoe core and cull assembly with hot, all spray under veouum in It's own tank. 18. Furnish c,ud install new geskets as needed for mein tank. 3 24). The follou-Ing test13 will be porformod in accordance with the lanteal revision of ANSI standard tests code CS?.12.800 a. Rssiotence measurements of all winding. b. Ratio tests on rated voltage connoctlon and on all tap connections. e. Polarity and phase-relation teat on the rated voltage connections. d. No load loss at rated voltage on the rated voltc*e connection. e. Exciting current at rated volaage on the rated voltage connection. f. Applied potential taste at 100% rated teat voltage. J g. Induced potontlul tests for 7200 cycles at I 11 1009 rated test volatus. h. Insulation power factor taste. 1. Insulation resistance tents (nwllssr) on each t windlns and oor.. 21. One coat of ANSI No. 70 gray paint will be applied J 22. rreparation and loading of the subject unit from our facility. I 23. Transformer will be shipped pressurized in dry ulr. 24. Transportation & new oil is not included In our basis price. I Aup. 6 '9O 141 10 0000 E/.STERN ELECTRIC 1-817-8199-1405 P. 3 'City of Denton pose Four In line with currant sovernmlment resulations resardins oil, filled transformers and possible PCB contamination "A11 mineral oil filled transformers are presumed to be PCB contaminated unless tests or other informatlon prove otherwise". All units beans sent for repair must have the i oiul tested to determine possible PCB contamination lavele. Both the main tank a'.11 auxiliary compartmments, such as LTC compartments, must be ci.yoked ooparately. Test rel'ulta must precede tho arrival of the transformer. Our proposal is based on a Non-PCB transformer. Our price for the rewind/redvalsn per our above work scope 1 thru 24 .............................098,740.00 i Delivery ..........................10 - 18 weeks 1 This offer ie subJeet to the terms and conditions above and included herein. Notice of objection to any other terms and conditions Is hereby alven. Thank you for this opportunity to be of service. Very truly yours, 4 1 +ajL r Christman S r ice Center hanaser _F rWC/ lop ~ I r i I Ile- m Terms and Conditlons of Safe. Price Reference-All Prices Its Negotiated, yvarronty or a'•'"v Etitwn Eletule Anne Plot Repe'•r CiAturr,y, IN. Ithe 'Yun'panv"1 nu+ylky the Company wrong that the work pvrforttad le,rumder shed be food r liven notore at Its objection to Any d;Ifneni Or rilki'vaowl Inmo+rrd cnrd;tlanf of detrau In wwlrrOruhip and material, Should any failure W mnfaim to this j except Imo am +urh lmml and wmdiUa+ is "-'Y in exprwe1y accepted Irv WYf Mty oppowt within a pwtod of one III Yer after lhoment if the rrpnred I .l'nara~rq of hvamped equlpm"I by the company IV, In the sow of equipment Uriafs dilfprnt W Wi l;w'at rrrmt rml fvinfi11nn1 re s7Uel or trfmanrd repaired or revarn"I On Mmhnr'I pramittl, after the Company net to ul the prnudeel, in whim tvrni Iueh dillan,m or orldidowAl arms end notlfled porcltror tarot the some a ready for nonfinancial geRlnl0r11. the eorvlainm than be ►xclaivr at w the taarllcum Iubjad eovared, the totnro Compory +Ihofl, upon orompi wflnalt nolbfwetlon theraul rid 7uhsunbai,on I and comltdmr Slated below auph, and 111th Irms and Cnrdnlon wrenpije that the v4wpmem fiat been ttarrrl, immoral, uuarred vol molMainrd in If vy laior up vntRmWranevur opmenwuu or rarrowtindence heltwrrn the anordlnn with Iny Company imbun'lom and Nw Wed indnpy QrdeVro, par lrtA correct tuth norxsmdol mltY by rapoiring, 0,m at its option, repladnF wily deftahvo wufk, F,0 R. Ott INCtry W ratlAir facihry, o 1i5T Ouotstlone k ho event 0 0 the Contpemor n1 issw"We lot pfOridinp wrk,ny arGtn fad, durnAbO,l it rage 40, Tat ddyt hone Ott data vnltrm o111m;s0 tented to the iltrocl, lrcludirq the removal, dlsorrmbly. implwnnamt at nJfnltllanon In the y,lotolom of any MrUpmtnr, maloriall or CtruClWn in the $%lent hKmvv to of orm:1 Price Policy the Carv4,,V to prhym in waroviv obliolo a, tit Ilenlpvrtar,on toil to ►dan ouonml try Crrn la referfy days from 0-f date of order, if Shipment a'If {ran the Cfvnprty lottery or repair lacility. The ruudidWn of volt Mot thrl IPA mutually ograed upon and ON Compute shall at nullFlad 01 and a" of lopli4d rtolurtnt or mo,440;ron of ourvin roYnde LuiV h,J 90 days 1611 Ip prvofnt at All tests fMt may be made, the date of order, Ihv pr." will be NdlutPA so th,'to in offrt of Ike time of Art wor'rity work dIAR be nefformrd on 1 dngte shift Snsighl I IAe;a 'rby,RA such thiprnenl of ramplollan: nawaae" Lrueatfv will not facenl IT, of the Monody tfvaupll fr'day. in the WMI that VON Qrlxk'fi [I'Iylfn talKlion of urpwnl hRlaru.+Pe{ mnnt4 h rem y,e daU of the order. wenarey Ile" nn an oval flna rttMule, the p'ortuum Qriwn el Ruth ovrt+ne Oil 'hAII le kv the puffhA t"s ANwnt. i Rruharg or reconditioning of bnuld:•np all h rem In:h,dq with any te'vicv THE WARRANTICS SET FORTH IN TH19 PROVISION ARE E%CI USIVC par}rmM,Ott haMlinparduuringlithen•trontfd!dvat lhepuicutet. AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES WHETHER STATUTORY, Tu" FA,PRESS OA IMPLIED fiNCIL,0110 ALL WARANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PUROBE AND Taw tyro doe not oncluda any frdral, Plato, nr local proberly, Irnmr, ALL WARRANT;FS ARISINU FROM COUhSE OF DEALING OR USAGE OF prtvlloge, Join, we, relate, 'pnu freilln. rotor knots, I0, alllar like UAn TRADEI. Ise remmdles proillded above an the aylthales are jariledon which met, may, w hrNNRr be pivil rble to, nwnura W. all Imfolod ulion, fw airy, fegu'A of If,0 Company to enmplif Willi ile oWipnieno. Cefracaan of W WHn towetf 10 ON tramsetion, the tvogyrly' ill isle, 14 value, a' Its 0,N, v,y nWl Conlon rally it ee minter and for the podod at tome WEYldwal shave to env slevfret oelformr'o in r!mlecavn lhvona in. 64th Stn u0, for the Hatt tPin holm complete 10fnimwlf of all Me liabilities of dM Company SOP at the purtfelrr Soo: Va pulu,toor AV Res to pay or rrmbursa the whither tae ctsimt of the Portraitist Ire bond in Sari in tore linclud;ng CompalN tat arty 140h Ides o biak the Cmnoanv 4t ill t!MpertOrl or, rofrpllt's nagllprnnl OF Inhere he with rn{nsaf Ill or rising out of the wale Fortrrmod are reoubW to holy. hrreululea Terms of Peymea+l In nu polls shell ohs Comili he eslpnnaibhl for removing, hanJl;ng, Pay mars N dce uoon rr;r,ol of i-woin stfitwing, veat,ng of fwplotins inwiaring oar. Delayed Payments Llabliity II parmentl re not mode In wCordrn+n will, Thomas let". a lrylnt thr On TN Campdrry, rat 1nnverart and avpPllon of any Iii, alkali not to IINIIo will, withoyt Melwhn to the right of Use Csmlerw trl ilmford alc payment. In Canbut, in to I priteudUq t"Ifforatol or blrerYrln far damage at Inn of bit srtrhd to the trenunt of Lhv purchnor in or omaunl 0,0,01 to oils lavar odrm prvrtlty at opWpmrtt, lore of Nolilt all tswrwt, sal of IM tit all 11th pot month of lte.mon t'erenf n0, the M1lghnt IAgel rNR en IhA unpaid W rn1m1►m nr puwot tyllom, awe of vi toot of ordluwl so rryt404fmhl Iglarkn. coat at tomnmuroey erwil+mvtrt I;nelttllnt edditiolRO smifnrll inclrtfad In USAII tell line 10611!lrl. SWIM of eustomfon of the FrfwtiltMr, r lot spy ►ayrnentl tpeceel, :ad it e0, f. Inc 411 H,A, or CO'wa0wnpal demaget wMUefrer. The Oomiatly Shall herd eke right to Itgnife hull our prliaf nryuv+nl in the rrmedws of Ifs porchner sot forth main an evdtrelve old the imr ly sm"Me at may flme, it. in Ill 6plriun, flw f keen iAi f.Orrd'n11M of film purdsoltr at the Conrpmny wall I'Moset to any aatoon, a anything daM in e:rfrteeaod don n61 joincly tie tom Ot paymrl Nuo;ntd. 1bPMlel uzh as Out pert W ramty or bfreen thereof, at from ON me'lufoclues. Shoved IhA ptAChkr 1.1 Wtoltgad btntrupt or ;'fohxnr. in Aay IPg,ll lilt, r'tilttry ratAlA, Uwronation of vchor ul direction of irefalladon, p'Vaefp,+0. firm eonlov Out Ram the rlgfd, It I" olwoon and unwWmu: irl"lon0ncm at redonnl 11481 n of mainlemnty, repair nor uta fd are Ire rpltr4 atbwod In such fmonodmq f0, filing tlmme IASlinl that purentI of nt C led by orc1urnhhod plklal tow "Onusel, waellrol in tW'luc1, i ertOll, 10 rollout 14 order Ivy) fo (09001 In In OVwf nrKIIIlAIfOn tarrget oot iv't wal Ines' qo' l r eehrw'W. dap nor PAtimad the pre" act forth tM MAehs/1!'I Mlne. hdt:n free the wear f II work is ddovMl by also purfirar, Iho Company may r"Irr voynunt IndMnnifiiletitM for all ma tai atwWmfdated! end WWE prrlamed under the Mdof. hrehtan shall IndAmMly and fM the Crnplrry Mrnsnt to 0,Y elarral, ONfyery--Rlell of lets 1 IMlitin 1'0 drnppot irlcionarg, Iwf pal lindted to, the tot of Mnv*ow nn rata den M hm shy recount of if+e 5n,rrfufer 1-0 she e with prnera mahtol widen and injunadane anal elaima of ihdd petiole far &I iretes Ail vamrfrlati t ' be Ail trf fo the 11461M dvufyp in proper lY and Feistiest injury. inatudlrp denhr arwrrhre daro+f Out pntormonoit of ere work Mlwfulr arts In eonlNCtMn wdh the dReesll Risk If for, lI damage ailing Irwatr to aw fruit. the Companv'r fievyy tn'Imnria Unit mill handllrl4 01 tnntr;ai omilpr compoaeMa nMnod to or or Pal for.'M shell n-emin with the pwichi enr0uh to rmnthnnr 1"CINms"h Ike"" So in Clairol rewhMg dbtcdy PAW I'maraser dreg also have rhk of toys of dome" if) tiny ttwwJ fratirist toddy horn fie nentaonce of the Company, lub{eel to tee I•avifierl abev" and r4mporvro which fail during Iny left mode by the Cpmpr'y. A,^y in i!,rd L;klllrv. addrtwnal re fill', Milling from /rmh Iort nr damage dull m fa the 60coun! The Comminy than, with rfW to It Ah wale, 40"IV wild the 10,41ho l, ! orb Iho nurcllrfr, Unlno ulherwht IgreA4 im wfltb'g batvlarr the parlwn, all *I c eApptkabls Wo knlen'l eWakimill mQMtaliOnAn, toil IAural ohrli be delrmmttd by the CorrienY. Termination sttipplnE (oefyA Any order 0,y contract may lie terminated by the Putcblw Ofdt, en rwotlen Shiuftnp of,al' ovnlpltbnn debt Le 1PPraaln,ele 0,,d era blued pre nefin to who Cnmpeny em upon peyn,rd At MlmenoMo rho prafmrf prnmPg ,eniol of sit rMrntery ,imormr,6vt erd aporoyolS boor the pt Iohnk. a,rn»m@IInncbanoA, Unsts %N4 ourefwaef VnIlulatel VI In 11WOMPA 0144, mat ■n tvI1ri:hlommo,t MInIR+Um ajlling in ~,at pldmnotblr, the CIMaOrry rele'vts lilt rillhl fa Ship pdbt to dm COMPACT alppmon date, The minimum hllbnq lot any Itelf;n QCdr.rmrd a't a droll ardor Willi ho SS4 Force Mapwre Soap Mel r;all Ali the Cnmpory than art by fubrY lot orb a to Inorforni ix for deaf in ASK, ell malnhalt become b.0, to-rafty or 'he Can oak;, pydnrmyltaA duo to Ike. 114,61!, HrRd or alhr Imhar alfflCUity, l,'1 el II all Cor il'Rr{ td wiry Eo etwentAl autharty of dole 0j,611v, flat fmbrov, our; u0, entropy the Cer,Jv, toot fhrlAgl, la'llly co ingl wit tolei wrKM to MAY 'r. An MIA &art* *0 Ix mxh IM entu'mon;o CollUm n Pine wom:pat dripping dnrrrpphltun, ;n1lboli y to nbaln "ACnlarv bees. netlAAlA, Of nrr/luAerw 0,,q ditnt, Lul refund win 1a medn d rewtned In Word c"Mion 'n Pot feclAaY pre b~pq lI fly Lhv Cnmp1,H within BO drytlnm d.ta of nrlPnal 1001ttIM Irtim wud MNpn, V Ihla la ems Ceuta bryano 119 ImoAeele ut Ot r rejonk Cori In tilt R►IM, of delay win pnlrv "No due to a^.Y lush twllm, the title Of evivery or C" Iw conrplfllor 041 by rrl0odnl Ay a prirvd of limn r0rlonably hternsrY is nvwreoma Ilia effect to rush *r Ay. I 5 . f G ~ MEMORANDUM TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager THRU: R. E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities FROMe Ernie Tullos, Director of Electric Utilities DATEt August 9, 1990 SUBJECT: HICKORY SUBSTATION TRANSFORMER FAILURE On Monday, August 6, at 2:05 experienced a p.m., the Substati an interns to 12 transformer 1 f differential relaying from uthea69KVas urce°andc13.2bKV main feeders. There was no interruption of service to our customers since we were operating with both transformers in parallel. The load on the Station was portio reduced b t ns of the 13.2 KV feeders eo adjacentsubstations. or Measurements were made of the internal windings of the failed f transformer, and it was determined that it would require rewinding. J The failed transformer was manufactured in 1965 and is a 12/16/20 MVA unit with load tap Chan in It weighed 90,000 9 for automatic voltage regulation. approximately 4;000 pounds with oil, and 60,000 pounds after gallons of oil was removed for shipment. Quotations were obtained from three bidders to rewind the unit as f follows: 1• Low Bide Eastern Electric r Ft. Worth, Tx 48,740.00 2' Southwest Electric } Oklahoma City, Ok X103,041.00 3' Magnetek Ohio Transform Bradenton, Fla. E108,000.00 1 u 11 a li ,t Page 2 Hickory Sub h i We accepted the low quote of the Ft. Worth, Texas company, and V shipped the transformer Wednesday afternoon. They now have the unit to begin repair. I~ we did consider junking the unit due to its age (25 years), but a new transformer would cost approximately $300,000 and would require one year lead time. We decided that we could not operate reliably since our only spare would be in service. When the unit is disassembled, the shop may find that additional work/parts may need to be replaced especially in the automatic tap changing section. We expect to have the unit returned for reinstallation in about 18 weeks. We have processed a budget transfer in the amount of $130,000 to cover all the expected cost, and have notified our insurance carrier of the loss. 1 j We have installed a spare unit that was purchased some five (5) years ago expressly for this eventuality. It is a 28 MVA unit compared to the 20 MVA faulted unit, and should be carrying load with everything back to normal by Monday, August 13, 1990. EHTstn 08090116 I1 , i V 1 j j 1 I 1 I~S 1 I 1 { I 111 i i 1 i f i CITY COUNCIL 1.4 i Q O f i ♦ p ~QLGGG6Cf~ FIFTH i ~raJJ~~r Ile- ov r enw~ r 2517L/1589 9 N0. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CHANGE ORDER TO A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND J yblj_c PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE CONTRACT -F~ EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on 2, jqqn , the City awarded a contract for the construction o certa n mprovements to - Cn~ in the amount of 2-i71~66_SO ; and WHEREAS, the City Manager having recommended to the Council that a change order be authorized to amend such contract with respect to the scope and price and said change order being in compliance with the requirements of Chapter 252 of the Local Government Code; NOW, TIVEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: I II , SECTION I, That the change order to the contract between the City an Jaco -P ;c_OO. , a copy of which is attached hereto, fn a amoun off- I ' yagh fip o ars k;p Zn-~ erg by approve an t e expen ture of funds there or sereby authorized. SECTION II. That this ordinance shall become effective immediate yI upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ,1990. 3 BOB CASTLRBERRY, MAYOR I -"U ATTEST: 3ERNiFER'Q I APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY, I t M1 +E. r. DATES August 21,1990 t CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd v. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1069 - OAK HICKORY & FRY PAVING AND (C~iANGF ORDER 93) i DRAINAGE I the00111END TION!3Werecommend s Change Order 43, to Bid 41069, in $ 2 0, 1 pproved, j SUtQINARY: This Change Order , s1de-wa along y Street SU14MAR required Order Is for additional curb/gutter and required for water and sewerrservices. due t additional work is for the addition of handicap ram A portion of this expens e original contract price was $1,173,266pSO. along a Street. previously approved by Council Order 1 andTh2 $1,209,379.92. , increased the proj ect to $1,229,249,90, Change Order #3 increases the total to BACKNps City of Denton, Change Order dated August 9, 1990, and Memorandum dated August 8 Engineering, , 1990 from David i Salom, Civic I PROGARAMS, DEPARTMENT ' PROar" Jago b j O strGROUPS andFCECTEDI Engineering Fry Street area. zees utilizing the FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this Change Order will come from improvement Bond Funds, ' Account #434-002-0010-8503-910 Street 5. b Respectfully submitted: Ll V. Harrell Prepared by: City Manager I 3F Name I To D. Shaw, C.P.M. ' Titles Purchasing Agent TS/jh 044.u0c j 1 ~4xrn aerr~ ' F J' i CITY OF UENION CHANGE ORDER i T: Di sion (Department) urc ase Ur der o. range r er o. r.... Engineerin 96854 3 f 4.n ie o ro ec b. Project cc No. Date repare Oak,Hic&ory A Fry Paving /Oraina,e 434-UU2-0010-8503-9105 August 9, 1990 Name an ress o Z on rac or Jagoe-Public Lo P.D. Box 25U - Denton, Tx. 16201 8. escrip on o or included in on rac See Memo Attached . c anges or ere an reason ordered (List individual changes as: A, 81 Cs , etc-. See Memo Attached TO. Bid Original Contract ev se ego a e r g na Revised Contract Item Estimated Unit Estimated C.O. Unit Estimated Estimated Changes No, quantity Price Quantity Price Cost Cost 1 14, B. C. O. Iota] Total it. Original Contract Price $1,173,266.5U- ncrease in on rac rice , New Contract Price *bl 7'c4Vl.M Decrease in Contract Price *with Change order R lzs contract time ncrease -crease y days. ew con rac time ays THE AFOREMENTIONLD CHANGE, AND WUkK AFFECTED THEREBY, IS SUBJECT TO ALL CONTRACT STIPULATIONS AND COVENANTS. r 13. 155UEU FOR REASONS INUICAIEU ABOVE: IA-g-Yd ec on uperv sor Date- p 14. ACCEPTED BY CITY ENGINEER: - 9a 51 ` n ure - Title a e 15. ACCEPTED BY CONTRACTOk: Signature NtTe ate N - I ~ <ro -L16. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER v.:.: 519nature Title Date ~'u a DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES: _ Ld gna ure --Title Date n CONDIT1014S OF APPROVAL: 17. PURCHASING/FINANCE gna ure -"Tf1TTe `fie COUNCIL APPROVAL (If needed) Date I' 0637! I, I i y 1G+~ y~ 1.4'as• Fry StrntOverleq t s r;,- • CITY 0I OENTOM - 810 SHEET 8s 7!566.9200,0/FWP*i 434-2520 !.Vnwi q Nvision 817/566-8358 Jtili~; yepertment 617!56F-'•sSt - ~6+'!0CSCaI W". ale 10 : Pfrtod 7 -1- 0 o To 10 Caatrxtor:.~goe• P ,311c a Addrm: PO. Bolt 1650, Cfnton"i" j Graiect: FnFV.verity EstlnsetWCo ntractCat: 111,;C6.30 Sid 40.. 1,6.) PO.Pte.:96854-Arat.0434002300585009105 Cantrxt'NOrktnq Deis: 3 Dove Us" Urdl Quenttty QwrMtg Yetoe MCRIPTIONOPYORK Of Original ComPletel UM ofC4myteteltl, 'em 0 Mewure Est6meh to Me Price Work 1 SP-S I M, 11 ,3 2' HW Worley SY 1,379.-' 1373 18.35 11 8056& SP-15A adjwtietw EA 1 1 $150.00 $150.00 3P-1 S.S Cj~M Megrrole EA 1 =250.00 $0.00 j TOTAL 111,658.30 i Chomp Orders: 3-B Remove Conc. C 3 G 11 530 $1.00 3954.00 i 3-C Remo" Cott. Orly* SY - 10.67 14.00 142.60 !dMM11et31 $404 135.00 11,091.40 3.2-A Cont. 5" 18.00 13,406.00 ~ 5.0-A-1 6" Cttn 23 113.50 1540.50 8.3•A 4'Cone.$/11/ it MI? $20.00 111,163.40 1 8.3.6 6' C4,ne. 0/W SY SS $23.50 $1,363.00 SP-2 Concrete Sw l1 424 11.00 142400 hpI s, . 1 a fry Street Mriay t Quantity Quantity Ye1w GESCWM 4f MOW Comptstw unit ofCompietw Item + tleeee Estimate to Date Price Work `ange Orders Cont. 8raakin4OutCOAC. it 30S 11.00 OWN Chen" Order'atal 520,111.48 i Portia] Estimate Toil 131,768.28 Lm Previous Esti rrnta I Amount Due This Estimate i M I r ` Pop 2 Ef i I I I i a ,r F E 3 AY a The urdersignadContractor cartifies that all vork, fncfuding m@1sr1els and equipment on hand, covered by this Wriodieai Payment has been oomplatad or daltwrad In aoeordanca vith the Contract Documents, that all amounts lave been paid by him for work, materials, erd equipment for which Previous Payments very issrrod and r fved from the Owner, Oral that currant payment shown herein is dos. CONTRACTOR JACOE-PUBLIC CO. B y Data t1fisti"onn rdod for Payment by: Total Yalue of Origlnal Contract Performed 0 rupcct Fxtra Work Pslrtormed - Shown ADove or a9( Data Attached Statement `Q` p' `rials on Ned - Shown Apom or Dept. Data Attached Statement i Total Valve of Work to Date / ZJ I ! 1 Less: Amt. Rotained LO,_ ;C 4 .P3 Not Amount Earned on Contract z~'r Approved for Payment By: LOSSAr.0untof Previol a Payments o/ S BALANCE Utility Dept. or City Ergr. Dote BALANCE DUE THIS ESTIMATE i I i y i 1 1 1 y FM~W t a. I } r r I CITY CUTNCIL FTIII Lll' I ~I i r 4 ht ~ p s ~e t 4t e 0 0 S H 0 ~~G7L~ OG~~O i 11. r ` t ~ i 2651L-5/3689 Na. k AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR PURWASE: OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WHICII ARE. AVAILABLE FROM ONLY ONE SOURCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REgUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DAI•E. I WHEREAS, Section 252.022 of the Local Government Code provides that procurement of items that are only available from one source, r including: items that are only available from one source becasse of patents, copyrights, secret processes or natural monopoli%s; films, manuscripts or books; electricity, gas, water and other utility purchases; captive replacement parts or components for j equipment; and library materials for a public library that are available only from the persons holding exclusive distribution 1J rights to the materials; need not be submitted to competitive bids; and i WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to procure one or more of the items mentioned in the above paragraph; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COWCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the following purchases of materials, equip- ment or suFV11es, as described in the "Purchase Orders" attached hereto, are hereby approved: P URCIl AS F, ORhER NWOER VENDOR AMOUNT 98817 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEM $70,987.50 t --MIS IBM S29.442,QQ SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above items sFi~all not constitute a contract between the City and the ' person submitting the quotation for such items until such person shall comply with all requirements specified by the Purchasing i Department. SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any contracts relating to the items specified in ,.",action I and the expenditure of funds pursuant tp said contracts is hereby authorized. ' I i t y t s r SECTION 1V, That this ordinance shall become effective immealaUily uupon its passage and approval. PASSF,D AND APPROVED this the day of , 1990. BOB CASUEBBRRYt MAYOR ~r ATTEST; { 7ENFlI UI IFALR Y p APPROVED AS TU LEGAL FORM: a DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY 6 1 BY: f 1 4 , ,i u s. { J. ' 4 i +i { DATEi August 21,1990 CITY COUNCIL REPORT T03 Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMs Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTS PURCHASE ORDER 098817 - AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. REC04t4ENDATIONs we recommend this purchase order in the amount 1 of 70,967.50 to A.M.S. be approved and processed for payment. The Data Processing Advisory Board recommends approva . i SUMMARYs This purchase order is for the renewal of software 1-13-e maintenance agreement to A,M.S. for the local governmental financial software (LGFS) , This is a single source purchase for proprietary software maintenance and is oxempt from bidding requirements. Included in this software program are the following subsystems, LGFS, Fixed Assets, Performance Report Painter, MeasuremenL Job Purchasing,,Inventory sControl~# PC nInterface, Allocation, This purchase order covers the time period from May 1, 1990 through July 31, 1991. a BACKGROUND: Purchase Order 098817, exert from Data nvaiceocessing A v eery Board Agenda Packet (Item 3) letter, sheet from A.M.S., and Data Processing Advisory minutes. AccountFECgTEW Information nnd Services# PROGRAMS DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS Purc as ng, Ware ous ng, Departments. FISCAL IMPACTS Funds for this purchase will come from budget Wu- s account number 0437-036-0174-9303. Respec ully submitteds Lloy V. Harrell City Manage Pr pared bye , Names Tom 9 aw, C.P.M. Titles Purchasing i T9/Sh 046,DOC , i 4 ~ II0 3 ° Ok d V WGA I m ~ > "o( +p ~o d K O pip 64 a ip M N 0 t V r go V + I WA 1 °n .w.s Y *h, BACKGROUND INFORMATION i for Item 3 Y i During the past ten years the philosophy of the city of Denton has been to purchase software systems versus developing them in house. The LOFB system from American Management Systems is an integrated financial system that was first installed in October of 1982 with the bnso system. In January of 1987 a number of subsystems were purchased and at that time the maintenance for the next 3 years was negotiated in the purchased price. The software maintenance eon wi be provided wth Cy of D areemet ensures that II ongoing )?technical support, e new releasestof the )software. fixesito I known problems and the hotline support.. This cost is quite a bit higher than last year, the increase is due to the subsystems coming under maintenance this year for the first time. It should be noted that while this cost is significantly more than we pay our programmers, this agreement ensures that our software keeps abreast of changes In the financial area of local government both from a ` legal and procedural stand point. 4 i i l 1 I E L` i 41 1 - pti, O• n r LO11 American Management S~stems, Inc. May 11, 1990 Mr. Gary Collins Project No: P2649 Data frocessing City of Denton 324-B East McKinney Street Denton, TX 76201 Dear Mr. Collins: Effective Augu^t 1, 1990 the IGFS maintenance support for the City of Denton expires. Under the License Agreement, the City of Oerienton is entitled to purchase maintenance support from M1S for additional pods. Some of the benefits LGFS clients derive from purchasing on-going support from AMS are: Delivery of annual enhancements to LGFS along with complete installation instructions, Updates to LGFS documentation. 1 • Continued active Involvement in the Users Group (one of the main sources for developing enhancements lists), Support with the development of new report requests using AMS provided report writers. Hotline support of IGFS processing questions. We would like to continue to provide the City of Denton with enhanced versions of LGFS as they are released. Per your contract the maintenance fee for LGFS is 15% of the prevailing price list (attached). I Remittance of the attached invoice will provide the City of Denton with LGFS maintenance support for the 12-month period of August 1, 1990 through July 31, 1991. If you have any questions, please call me at (703) 841.6731. 1 1 Sin ly, Lee Ross Manager, Product Support 1 t 1777 Nrob km! Strtd 1 Arlinglan, VirginIA 22209. (70)) 811-60001Telek 6" •Answtrbkk AMSINC Regional l+ffues In! Chkegu . Denver . Houslon - New Yak . Ssn FrWheo •e. ~xJ ~wv M1.. rhf•wn pl...♦.... I . -V -77 - 77 TWO s v F i American Management Systems, Inc, Mr, Gary Collins May 11, 1990 Data Processing City of Denton Project Not P2649 324.8 East McKinney Street Denton, TX 76201 LGFS Maintenance Fees for August 1, 1S90 through July 31, 1991. t LGFS $ 29,925.0 Fixed Assets 4,500.00 Performance Measurement 21250.00 Job Cost Accounting 4,500.00 Cost Allocation 4,500.00 Extended Purchasing 94000.00 Inventory Control 80250.00 Personal Computer Interface 750.00 Report Painter 750.00 SUBTOTAL: S 641425.00 LGFS. Maintenance fees for May 1, 1990 through July 31, 1990. 1,125.00 Job Cost Accounting $ Cost Allocation 1,125.00 Extended Purchasing 20250.00 Inventory Control ---4 SUBTOTAL: S 60562.50 TOTAL INVOICE: S 70,981.50 E { Lee Ross Manager, Product Support • PLEASE NOTE: QBlY idyl l 51 ~l E4.91 J-UYngoon. no pY t 9 25._1994 TO RE~.IY~Sp~41A1 TR.AIHSHB 0 i, Please make remittance payable to, c/oorlele Ross' 10thtfloorems, Inc. 1711 North Kent Street i 1777 Noah atgbnal offices Arling!on, Virinia 22Denver I 209 # (703) $41-M 41 lex 6" - Fe ne back AMSINC ~+:•d is Ic:CaaiD a•NYJ a•811~ 1 I 1 R, I 1 w fn~•,• Local Government Flnancial System (LGFS) LGF0 - IBMIGROUP 30 PRICE SCHEDULE 1, SOFTWARE tICENSE FEES R91~JZ LGFS (Bade CIC&VBAM ..,,,,,,,,.,.,...,,,..,1109,600 System) Include: • 8udget)ng • Expend)turs Amount)og for Purchases • Planuinif • Accounts Payable • Oeoeral Ledger • Cash Dlabur"monls • Reveoue Accounting • Expenditure Accounting for Payroll n'~ • Accounts Rocelvablo • Cool Accounting • External Financial Reporting • Grants Management end Reporting • Responsibility Reporting • Project Raportity • Eacumbrancs Control • Cash Management Opllona) Fixed Aseote 10.000 Subsystems Job Cost Amounting .,...,,.,,.,.,.,,_.,..,,,50,000 Coat Aliocatlon ,....,......,.,...._,..,.50,000 Extended Purchasing ..........,.........,..,60,000 faveatery Ceolral (must have Exteoded Purchasing) ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,66,000 Performs ce Measurement 16,000 Investment Inventory 30,000 Advanced 0 Work Order (mum MPva Job a , .........................30,000 Cost Accounting) .....................30,000 Fleet Manegemsot (must have Work Order) ..................................00,000 Debt Masssemeot .............,,,.........36,000 DoeumenlalWnt Two copies of all user andtechnlcal iocumentation are lacluded. Addllloaa) eopks of any manuals are available at standard list prim. 3. TERaM OF LICENSE AND RENEWAL The inltiai term or the Lictom is thirty (30) yea". At the and of this lnitlal term, Wawa may resew the Woease annuslly, for a fa eve) to two (3) percent *rise latlal liana foe. i 3, MAINTENANCE AND WARRANTY The system Is warranted roe eon (1)yeer from the data of delivery of the seflworr. As optional aenusi malateaana servke provides mollmuel wsRaaty, telephone analtetloa, and oonual sahasamwt relasss.111e eurremt annum) Mal nteoOnce fns am AA"o 1161 peresOlaf prevalung linens fa hr LGFS, i INSTALLATION As part of the license fa AM$ will Install LGFS sod the llaassd eptkos ea goer sempuser and eamplele the slatdard lnstaliuioo took. 1. IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT -Make 1 AM$ professional staff will provide support for tralaing, product oooeuhiob, aovereia, said other looks amseary W fmpp}omen! the system. These tasks will be eoadudod primaeJy at the event's site. Support will be provided st ttaadard AMS rates for profosalonal sorvfaa, sa stitched. Travel limo to end from the eueol's site Vol bt ehsrnd at 0% of the standard rate, Reasoosble trawl, livfog, and other eutcf-pocket expenses to provide the support wiube billed to dieste at AMS costa, lacludiag a tea (l0) percent foo for astoclated adralalstrat)ve now. To peevide for laftW implemeotetlea aaistance, a eueat may elai to purchase 160,000 of proNsdocal services at a 1091 dimuot (616,000). 6. TERMS OF PAYMENT OF SOFTWARE UCENSE FEE ` A A. $5% of uasse fa upeo aecution of Ucesee Agreement and delivery of docum omatlea, 1. 11% of hews No open delivery of the software, 0. Contractual flee, apoose relmbarsomeat, and cli"s for ediManal support due apse reaipt of atenthly btu. D, A llow# fa aft** (3) pereest per toouth will be due foe any amsuat not paid wHh)n thlxy, (30) days of due data. I EFFECTNE JULY 1, 1110111 PRrCE1SUB W TO CHANGE MnM f NOTICE i Capws% Flliod"Asrs 1771 North Karl SPW ArOnOlon, WON& (703) 111!000 I 1 I 1 v' i Declslon Support Tools and Data Base Options ISM Versions - All Processor (croups PRICE SCHEDULE 1. SOFTWARE LICENSE ! k !'3 Decision Personal Computer lnledece(M),lndudinBPC Report PsWO.e M000 support Report Distribution u'ow Tools; 1MAC04E (UmalfkWVon10h) 50,000 Included Rl:poxrER Alternate D112/00 $50,000 Technical ADABAS/CICS verslone; DATACOM p M(S 10 wo IMSBDC The wrchergo torahemsIt tedutlal v0r010M Ippliee 101he boot product (CUPS. $IS, I IRS),"to Ihe opt lonal subsystems. I Discounts on The hcensoI"Usledabove provide%ten (l0)copke;sddltlorolcoplesore available at I)*following license PC-Based lm~ Tools: $5,000 Second ten corks y Thlld ten copies F Add it k,"I sets o l ten copies ,250 Documentation: etpin~i lluserandectel aledo Crl enletbnforwlnlr trvaso wsreminclude.Addilbruleopksolany Z T ERM OF LICENSE ANTS provides a license to use the software at a atngie compuler facility for a term of INrly (30) yes to. For personal computer pi oduc Is, each copy permits use of the software on a atngle machlne. III! 1. MAIN IENANCE, ENKANOEMFXT, AND WARRANTY I The system is warronled for one (1) yeas from the date of delivery of the soflwee. An optional annual m01ntemnet service provides conllnuedwarrranly, owphonelcconsultation, endenhamoment releases. TTwcurrent annual matMe- lulxe Fees ace liftmen l15) per ooFr P tl 4. TERMS or PAYMENT A. 7096 of Ilcerse fee upon a%ecudon of License Agreement. 15. 3091 of (kerm fee upon deliver of the software end dorument lion. C. Expense reimbursemenband fees for support provided on atit la and malardals basis aredueupon radptof monthly bill. D. A nrisnee fee of Iwo U) percent per month will be due for any at mount tots paid within thirty (301 days of due date. i • ~ 1 r i' (ft(C1Ni afPT(MAEA I,1k1 PARMIN IN."Cl to CM K4 "nMt NOTrA l Islas Corporate Headqueriers 11?I North Kant Slrest _Ar(rgion,Virplnla (103) 041-OM I 1 1+~ r'. xa z i r MINUTES OF DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD MEETING OF AUGUST 9, 1990 MEMBERS PRESENT: Jim Kuykendall, Bob Minnia, Brian Scott, Charles Ridens MEMBLRS ABSENT: Cengis Capan OTHERS PRESENT: Gary Collins and Dave Dickey i Jim Kuykendall made the motion and Charles Ridens seconded the motion that the minutes of the January 9. 1990 meeting be accepted as presented. The motion was passed unanimously, I Charles Ridena nominated Jim Kuykendall for Chairman of the Data Processing Advisory Hoard Brian Scott seconded the motion, it passed unanimously and Gary Collins turned the meeting over to Jim Kuykendall. Gary Collins briefly described the department's background and operational philosophy. Under this philosophy the City of Denton has maintained a very minimum staff. Gary Collins explained that the 'LGFS' system is a totally Integrated rinrnoial System and the increase in the annual fee was due to the number of subsystems coming under maintenance for the first time. In negotiating for the subsystems in 1957 we negotiated that purchase price would include 3 years of maintenance rather than the traditional 1 year of maintenance. Gary Collins explained that while $70,000 was more t_~an we would pay for a Programmer that we receive more than just Programming services from this agreement. lie explained that in ad,•ition to the annual release of the system, with this agreement we also receive technical assistance via phone "hot line" for not only Data Processing staff but Accounting staff. The AMS staff stays up-to-date with changes in the Financial Industry, Government regulations, and auditing procedures and incorporates these changes into their system, Gary Collins explained that in order to have in house staff perform all of these activities it would require more than the coat of this agreement. Jim Kuykendall explained the reason that the D.P. Advisory Board looks at items like this maintenance agreement. Gary Collins explained that 86,562,50 of this coat was for the 3 months of maintenance on the subsystems that were purchased in 1957 in an off cycle time frame and the 964,125 was for the 12 months of maintenance on the entire system. Charles Ridena made a motion that the Board recommend the City Continue this maintenance agreement and Jim Kuykendall seconded the motion. The motion was passed unanimously. Jim Kuykendall explained that back in January when this issue was first brought to the board he had put a motion on the floor and it died for a lack of a second and how critical he felt this issue was to properly serve the various departments throughout the city. ! Gary Collins discussed the criticality of some of the PCs and the 1 i age of the PCs and how some PCs have experienced failure. Jim Kuykendall stated that in most cases these PCs are not only PCs but also double as terminals for Departments to access the mainframe. Charles Ridens asked if IBM could not refuse to service the PCs that are broken and then placed under maintenance. Gary Collins explained that IBM could ask to inspect the PCs before accepting them for maintenance and require us to have them operational before acceptance on a maintenance contract. Bob Minnie asked if the staff could not maintain these PCs. Gary Collins explained that currently we do not have the staff to support this function for all the various departments' PCs. Gary Collins also stated that he would consider supplying this support if the Personal Computer Analyst's position that has been requested in the last 2 Budget Processes had been approved but cautioned that we would also have to have a parts inventory, training for staff, and diagnos+.io equipment. Charles Ridens ask if we could not piecemeal these maintenance contracts since they were for various departments. Gary Collins explained that under the now state law similar i contracts needed to be grouped and sent out for bid and that the Purchasing agent was emphatic that we follow this procese. Charles Ridens stated that the cost of having someone perform this service on a time and material basis is prohibitive due to the per hour cost of service people. Jim Kuykendall made a motion the board recommend that the city enter into a maintenance agreement with IBM for all of the IBM PCs in various departments and Charles Ridens seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Gary Collins stated that when the City of Denton first looked at the GIS system we were going to need 5 workstations. We initially acquired 4 IBM RT model 125 workstations with the intent of acquiring the 5th wnrketation at a later date. Gary Collins explained how the D.P. staff could use the 5th workstation during the implementation of the GIS software and database. Gary Collins also explained that shortly after acquiring the GIB system IBM announced a replacement machine for the RTs which was the RISC/6000 and it was 4 to 5 times as powerful. as the RT. For a limited time IBM is offering a 801 rebate of the RT purchase price if a customer purchases a RISC/6000. Gary Collins explained that we had budgeted $33,681 for the acquisition of the 5th 0I8 workstation and with the 801 rebate and the lower costs of the RISC/6000 we can upgrade the 4 existing workstations and acquire the 5th workstation for $1,351 lose than originally budgeted for the 5th RT. Charles Ridens asked why IBM sold us the RTs if they knew the RISC/6000 were coming out. Gary Collins responded that IBM had not announced the RISC/6000 at the time we got GI8 and therefore could not bid them. Bob Minnie asked why they would offer this rebate and how we could get them so cheap. Gary Collins responded that IBM was aggressively going after the workstation market and the RISC/6000 was a new generation of technology that made the cost less than the RTs. Brian Scott made a motion that the board recommend the City acquire the 5th 018 workstation and upgrade the existing 4 workstations to IBM RISC/6000 and Charles Ridena seconded tote motion. r - a.w1 A 1 Gary Collins explained we have had Courier equipment for quite a while and our problem in the past has been that not all of our equipment could be attached to the Courier controllers, Gary Collins further stated that with the new Courier equipment being bid at this time that problem no longer exists. Gary Collins explained that most of the equipment being replaced was form 6 to 9 years old and some of the equipment was failing on a weekly if not more frequent basis. Gary Collins went on to state that some a of the new equipment has a 3 year warranty and due to the age of our current equipment the maintenance .oats keep escalating. Cary j Collins explained that the city could replace this equipment and place the new equipment on a 5 year lease/purchase agreement and the additional costs would be $18.44 per month greater then the maintenance costs on the current equipment. Gary Collins indicated that maintenance costs used in his analysis had a 30% per year inflation factor and this was probably conservative since some of the older equipment was experiencing a 15% per year inorease. Brain Scott asked if all the equipment was IBM compatible and Gary Collins responded it was totally compatible. Bob Minnis asked if we currently leased this equipment and Gary Collins replied that we currently own all of this equipment and just pay maintenance on it. Gary Collins indicated that the cost of the lease purchase reflected the trade-in allowance be applied to reduce the amount being financed. Brian Scott asked why there was a difference between the number of units of Courier and IBM. Gary Collins responded that if we went with Courier we could use some of the newer Courier equipment and would not have to replace them but if we went with IBM we would have to replace 6 more terminals and 2 more printers. Brian Scott made a motion that the city replace the current terminals, controllers and printers with new terminalso controllers and printers from Idea Courier and Bob Minnie Seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. There being no other business the meeting was adjourned. 1 i 1 ~ 1 1 i \ r. 1 I ~ yr r ' r DATER August 21,1990 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TOR Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMi Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER 098818 - IBM RECOPIhfENDATIOtJ: we recommend this purchase order 098818PtocIBM be aE,prove n the amount of 434,330.00. he Da Advisory Board recommends approval. SUMMARY: This Purchase Order is for the purchase of one IBM, RT workstation model RISC/6000 and for the upgrade of 4 IBti RT workstations to the RISC 6000 models. These work stations are part of the O.I.S. System and will complete the requirements fur five workstations. These RT workstations are proprietary items and exempted from the old process as a high tech acquisition in compliance with state law. r Processltlg dPisorysBoa order 198818 BPacket to (Etem ~ 5), PricefQuotation from IBM. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Information Services Department an G.I.S, mplementat on. k FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this purchase will come from O.I.S. Cert Cate of obligation. Fund Account 0437-03(-0176-9303. Respec fully submitted: J A' u 1'7 , L Ll d V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.Mr Title: Purchasing Agent , ` TS/jh 045.DOC I j I I 1 I; I j r ' 1 I I 1.! I y --i a Z 10 g - 1 D Y s D fln OI a tin .40% V ro N o w ar 1Y VA Na yO -i WMN mN N cN a Z r0. O~ (rRI A0, ll ~U R F1 -4 c fn > } R C P ~N 0 00 w p I H x < W Z Gm C, O 30H 01 a 0 4rws ~do CI . 1 I VA a Ia rl i P oz z z s o~ UP 4 \ \ \ M M> Y > > W 2 ~ N ` G Is14 n 21+NT o yy 1~ r o ~ F~CA ~~~,>1 N 1. d ii 47'1 111+1 p ~I Ou i7 O 1 f rf O O O O O M 111 ro i W ♦ flv N 1+ dl W W I r I • ~ ►M. ~ O 00 no Ill N M O ~6 pt7 A o O O 1 O Ov .,rO O 1 ~ 1 1 0 O p A 0 11 C BACKGROUND INFORMATION " for Item 6 When the City of Denton decided to implement a OIS system with council approval, we determined the need for 6 workstations. At Lite start of the project only 4 workstations were acquired with the intention of acquiring the 6th workstation at a later date once the GIS Data Base was built. At that time $330681 was budgeted for the fifth workstation. Since that time a number of circumstances have occurred that would make it advisable to acquire the fifth workstation. The original workstation selected were IBM RTs and since that time IBM lifts introduced the RISC/6000. For a limited time IBM is offering a 809 rebate of the coat of the RTs if a customer purchases a RISC/6000. The RISC/6000 is approximately 6 times more powerful than the RTs. Additionally it has become apparent that the Information Services Department could utilise the fifth workstation in the .implementation of the OIS system and the creation of Lite OIS Data Base. The attached cost analysis shows that the City of Denton can upgrade the existing 4 RTs to RISC/6000 and acquire a 6th RISC/6000 for =1,361 less than originally budgeted for the 6th AT. GIS WORKSTATION COST COMPARISON UNIT TOTAL ITEM QTY COST COST raanemrraara~sreYrmsrma a esraemaaaaraaerameemna ' WORKSTATION COSTS k 6TH ION AT 1 33,681 33,681 4 TOTAL BUDGETED 1 33,681 33,881 IBM RISC/6000 NEW WORKSTATION 1 26,490 26,480 UPGRADE EXISTING RTS 4 11710 6,840 ` TOTAL UPGRADE COST 6 279200 32,330 j SAVINGS 11361 i ' I 1 i *~,{.F. n. a,. ._y. ::f ....iia ♦ be1 fn,q Vd tu.'. i`J:'YN MniMM 1 1 _ Y IN~ i { ri riura 7 'so I129 FR011 1811 DALLAS G/PS-026 _ PAGE.002 pic~.a InUrnaiionei avsim a Machlnaa CaporaUon MS L9J Noway Date i 8/7180 Was. Tasas 75224 21411 44000 Memo to. Gary Collins Director of IIS City Of Denton Sub)ectt RISC replacement Dear Gary, I have reviewed the pricin for the RT Migration Assistance Program end compiled the following information. i I HT Invoice amount 271072.00 .8167 tape invoice amount ~ ~Q3.00 28,76.0 i c~~cQQ I 1 Total to apply to RISC/600 22a78T.M Hardware for RISC18000 system ' tape Cp ROM 210810.00 . t The entdre cost of the RISC16000 will be absorbed by the AT credit. Software for each replacement w RISC/6000 11710.00 Dave's RISC16000, no CD RUM 23,610.00 software 1.980.00 Total for Dave'a RISC/6000 950490.00 Total cost of replacing~ 4 RT's with 4 RISC/6000a and ordering and sddidonal RSIC16000 F83 31.330 00 Note that the RISC/6000 configured has only 2 serial ports and 1 parallel port for device attachment, No other slots are available. ' Please give me a ring if there are any other questions. 1 Sincoroly, , . , r t• t jam, ~ , . . Dean A. Belvis ' Marketing Representative 1 i i ~ I CITY COUNCIL i m 1: i r• j ~ I ' 0 O 1 D ~ it Ol M.M M, 7-1 1 1 ~o CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council k FROM% Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager } SUBJECT: ordinance Prohibiting the Operation of Ultralight Aircraft os Denton Municipal Airport. RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Airport Advisory Board and the Airport Manager, to approve the Ordinance prohibiting the operation of Ultralight Aircraft os' Denton Municipal Airport. SUMMARYf There will be no cost to the City of Denton. BACKGROUNDt aircraft Due to the slow, low altitudes and unstable flight of Ultralight Airport ~ i 'i they do not commingle safely with the aircraft on Denton Municipal toes attachment A). ' PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:, This agreement will not affect any other department or group. FISCAL IMPACT: 'Ij None. I Re,p fully sub itteds a Prepared bys Ci V Manager Joe T ompeon Airport Manager APproveds Rick Sve a Deputy City Manager i t i j I mil 77- i~ l R r TO: The Mayor and Members of the City Council ! FROM= Joe Thompson, Airport Manager DATE: July 300 1990 SUBJECT: Ordinance Prohibiting the Operation of Ultralight Aircraft on Denton Municipal Airport. i It is t„e recommendation of the Airport Board and Air after reviewinu the safety needs of Denton Municipa rAirport and in-depth discussion with the Federal Aviation Administration, that the City Council adopt an Ordinance Prohibiting the operation of Ultralight aircraft on the Denton Municipal Airport. I •a F I 33 i i i t E ! i I M11 4 ATTACHMENT A CC~ •t I CONCVAA CII Ara rrwoL INlr~IAl•M,OoA~/ I C 1 ' AUO 1 d _ Aro.l,woL 1 iG j Ma. Debra As Crayor:ern :NITIAL"M f City Attorney oA Municipal Building Denton) Tx 76201 A7o. IYMWL Derr Mal `rayoviethl INI 11A,0. Tour letter of July 271 19891 requested our assistance with regard to OATS banning hot air balloons end ultralights from Denton Municipal Airport. As you are no doubt awarep an airport owner is ob A,a11L Ol maintain the airport Basted to operate end ma sport for the use sad benefit of the flying public. However, while the airport owner suat allow its use by all typesp loads, sad clssaa of aeronautical activIty u wall as the geoeral public CAN (passengers, vieitorsp otc/)p the obligating agraements do provide for exeeptloose to the iatereeta of flight astatyp the airport owner may ATC NIAICL impose reasonable rules or raaulatioas which restrict use. The owner may establish such tsirp equal, and tot unjustly discrimioatavy aeaditlems to wI,LUAIa. be met by all users of the airport u may be seaeseery for the sale sad efficient eperatioa of the sirpottS The owasr may also prohibit or )Fait A any given type, kisdp or cis" of serosautle" use of the airport-4f such action is ase"ury for the safe operation of the airport or nesessary to A,p,,YwoL oar" the civil aviation ands of the yAbiicA The decision to limit or bas hot a!r halloos and ultsalight tra!!in as the INI}IAl1AIE. f airport rust be made by this city es apses of the airperto such decision OA, must be made on the bests of )stet . It is southwest Lgisa policy to allow airport owmave to exerelu Mir own judgment to the extent possible. We will not go behiad their deoiaioa usless there is evidemse that a denial '"IOL was arbitrary or clearly unjustly disarialeatory without say operational or safety conaideratiom u the basis/ N Tia1AlE. We are not in a peaitioo to advice an the type of document or wording of OATS same to be used in takias such action. We willp however) be happy to review any proposal you wish to submit to this office And provide commeste. 10''"'NO1 Metwitketasdlaa the abovep be adviesd that should the city take action to IN„IALSmO N4,04 bra esy type, klodp or class of esromautieal activity sad should a formal complaint result tberafrom, it will be iscumbeat on this office to eomduet 1AT1 an Imatigation to saM the detatrniaatien cited sbove, I I I FAA form 10414 IM11 OFFICIAL FILE CONY v u l o F,O.: IMI «dl110 1 I J 1 [y ' 5r : I ! T if you-Aavs questions on tba above nattarP please e611 Mr. Garq Ma8 at (817) bt4-56384 Sincerely, V ~►ii t yOwMo ' im J.:Yo«ra Ma Ser. airports ho8rasds8 Dann ' i I ASw-63li=wioetMarilycRo E 714-.%38108/30/89t(tiip116491) i i I i i I~ , 3 I • i i t i' I it !j j 1 r 7T --7 nn 1 1 S d ti0 MINUTES AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD MAY 9, 1990 CHAIRMAN - DAVID ARNO THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DENTON AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD MET WEDNESDAYr MAY 9, 1990, AT 5:30 P.M.r AT THE DENTON MUNICIPAL Sao) AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING, DENTON# TEXAS. MEMBERS PRESENT: George Gilkeson, Nancy Hundley, Allie 1 Miller, Rick Woolfolk and Gene Wright. MEMBERS ABSENT: David Arno and Don Smith. OTHERS PRESENT: Penny Britton, Fox-51; Pat Cannonr North Texas Ballooning Association; Jerry Drake, Assistant City Attorney= Gary Ewing, F.A.A.; Jim Huff, Air Denton, Inc.; Joyce Poole$ Fox-511 Tony Riley, Air Dentonr Inc.; Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager; and Joe Thompson, Airport Manager. Acting Chairman Gene Wright, called the meeting to order. I. Considered the minutes 'of the regular meeting of April k 18, 1990. Minutes approved as written. I II. Public Session. Pat Cannon, North Texas Ballooning Association, discussed the exclusion of the use and operation of Hot Air Balloons at Denton Municipal Airport in reference to Draft B1 of the Airport Rules and Regulations. Mr. Cannon informed the Board the Hot Air Balloon pilots normally depart the Airport at least. 30 minutes prior to sunrise and are usually clear of aircraft traffic within five minutes of departure. Mr. Cannon added that NTBA pilots are required to attend certification programs in addition to several safety seminars. Mr. Cannon requested permission to use Denton Airport from 500 a.m. to 7:00 i a.m. in order to prevent interference with aircraft traffic. Gene Wright suggested that Joe Thompson, Airport Manager, and Jerry Drake, Assistant City' Attorney, schedule a meeting with Mr. Cannon to review the general k guidelines and safety standards. y I y {br ~rtj ~ 1 I > Airport Board Minutes May 9, 1990 Page 2 A general discussion concerning the operation of Ultralights at Denton Airport followed. Joe Thompson, Airport Manager, recommended that the use and operation of Ultralights at Denton Municipal Airport be prohibited, due to safety considerations, and suggested that ! Ultralight pilots use Lone Star Air Park, a considered Ultralight Airport. Gene Wright suggested that only in an emergency situation should an Ultralight Pilot land at Denton Airport (i.e. engine failure). Gary Ewing, FAA, stated that the FAA does not object to this ordinance, but pointed out that should an Ultralight pilot object to the ordinance, the FAA will be obligated to conduct an investigation. Gene Wright made a motion that this ordinance be reviewed by the City Council after Jerry Drake, Assistant City Attorney, has rewritten the ' ordinance to include Ultralight landings in emergency ` situations. Allis Miller seconded the motion. Motion was carried unanimously. Rick Woolfolk made a motion to table Draft #5 of the Airport Rules and Regulations, and requested that Joe Thompson, Airport Manager, and Jerry Drake, Assistant City Attorney, review the document for further alterations or additions. Nancy Hundley seconded the motion. Motion was carried unanimously. Ft, Joe Thompson gave a brief update on the Aerial Farm se Service, Inc. request. Mr. Thompson stated that Roger Krause President, Aerial Farm Service, Inc., requested permission to operate off Denton Airport on an "es needed" i basis to apply fungicides and insecticides in the event { that inclement weather prevents equipment from operating from a grass strip. Gary Ewing, FAA, offered to furnish Mr. Thompson with a sample Agricultural Lease to review. Mr. Ewing also advised that a short-term lease for Aerial Farm Service Inc. should be written. Gene Wright requested that Mr. Thompson supply the Board a short-term lease requirements concerning this issue for Board members to review. ! i I, i 1 ~ q t r~.yr. 1 T A 9 l Airport Board Minutes may 9, 1990 C Page 3 Joe f EscThompson Agreement discussed eNo.1d19015)tofuthe Airport Leas rnished by Jerry ! Drake, Assistant City Attorney, Mr, Thompson requested that Mr. Drake furnish an Escrow Agreement that would prevent potential lessees from non-payment of their lease agreements if the lessee backed out of a signed agreement. Mr. Drake stated that the same goals could be achieved motion without an Escrow Agreement. recommend this issue to the City Council, with E the slight modification being that if the City fails to comply within a reasonable time limit, that the money i be refunded. Rick Woolfolk seconded the motion. Motion € was carried unanimousl,•. II1, Airport Manager's Report. a. Revenue Detail - Joe Thompson distributed the 199D- Ai91 Members to review. Mr. Thompson stated that there was a delay on the Monthly Expenditures/Revenue report, and he will be mailing the report to Board Members as soon as the Accounting Department sends the statement to him. b, Texas Department of Aviation - An overview of the Texas Department of Aviation Seminar, April 19-201 19901 was given by Joe Thompson. Mr. Thompson informed the Board that because Denton Airport is classified as a reliever airport, future developments of the airport will be dealt with directly by the FAA, and added that the TDA does not deal with reliever airports. c, N,T.C,O.G. - Joe Thompson gave a brief update on the status of the Satellite Airport Development Project by the North Texas Council of Governments, Mr. Thompson stated that the NTCOG has been granted funds by the FAA to try and locate a satellite airport site that can be ' developed to relieve Love Field and D/FW Airports. Mr. Thompson distributed literature surrounding this Issue for Board members to review and stated that Denton could be considered a suitable aitb for this project. I r 1 Airport Board Minutes c May 9, 1990 Cj Page 4 General information included a discussion of the City i Council Budget Priorities Questionnaire. Joe Thompson pointed out that the Airport was ranked low on the priorities listing. Gene Wright suggested that the City Council be made aware of the importance of the Airport and asked that the Chairman, Dave Arno, schedule a meeting between the Airport Advisory Board and the City Council. Mr. Wright also suggested that the City Council be invited to the Chamber of Co,rmerce Mixer scheduled for August 9, 1990, at Fox--51. Mr. Wright stated that this function would give Chamber of Commerce Members a chance to become familiar with the Airport operations. A list of the items permitted to discuss in Executive Session, requested by George Gilkeson, was distributed for the Board members approval. The list was prepared by Jerry Drake, Assistant City Attorney, who stated that Advisory Boards, by law, are permitted to discuss any { topic they so choose. `j With no further business, the Airport Board meeting was adjourned at 7:20 p.m. { The next meeting is scheduled for June 20, 1990, at 5:30 i' p.m. in the Airport Terminal Building, Denton, Texas. j i f f i i ~ON t 1 y 1 r 2904L i ORDINANCE N04 i AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SEC. 3-14 OF CHAPTER 3 (AIRPORTS AND AIRCRAFT) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCESi BY PROHIBITING THE OPERATION OF ULTRA- LIGHT AIRCRAFT ON THE CITY OF DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AND WITHIN THE ESTABLISHED TRAFFIC PATTERNS OF THE CITY OF DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORTt CONTAINING FINDINGS OF FLCTSt PROVIDING THAT ANY PERSON VIOLATING THE TERMS OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE DEEMED GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR AND UPON CONVICTION SHALL BE FINED IN ANY SUM NOT MORE THAN TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00)) AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. WHEREAS, the City Manager and his staff have provided the City council i ultralight aircraft atereliv safety r ahazards irportel created by the operation of WHEREAS, after careful study, the Airport Advisory Board has j recommended that the City Council approve the 'regulation of ultra- light aircraft in the interest of flight safety and the protection of lives and propertyl and BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTONt j i Section i. The City Council of the City of Denton makes the following n ngs of facts A, The City of Denton owns and operates the City of Denton Municipal Airport. B. The City of Denton Municipal Airport has been des- ignated a reliever airport by the Federal Aviation Administration. C. The City of Denton Municipal Airport has in excess activity hofdtransie t) aircraft, and fa#highd activity of aviation instruction programs. D, Federal Aviation Regulations Part 103.17 prohibit ultralight operations within an airport traffic area without prior approval, E, The City Council of the City of Denton may estab- lish such fair, equal and not unjustly discrimi- natory to be limit! anysgiven (typthe e f f y wK I Jf, Y~YiA,Y, _ kind, or class of aeronautical use of the airport if such action is necessarys ! 1, gor same and efficient use of the airport] 2. To keep operation activities within ac- ceptable noise levelas or 3. To serve the civil aviation needs of the public. g, The City council of the City of Denton finds, de- clares, and determines that an unsafe condition may be created by ultralight aviation activity on the of Denton Municipal Airport, and within its City traffic patterns, due to the speed, maneuverability, ~ and operational characteristics of the ultralight aircraft, in relation to the poedominant aeronauti- cal activity at the City cipal Airport. i the City of Denton finds, de- City o~ ter The mineand Council declares that the unsafe on o! ultra- light aircraft would create an unsafe condition, k and is not in the best interest of the sage and + { efficient use of the airport, nor will aucublippc~a tint serve the civil aviation needs pp of the p section 11. ThatSection nded to read of hater 3 of the Code of , ordinances~ersby amended Sec. 3-14o Oltralight Aircraft. (a) An ultralight aircraft is defined as an aircraft 14 C which eats the requirements may tfroforth m t mento time, 103.1, as the mare may be amended shall o(t)the City o! Denton operuniatecipaal Airportight aircraft subsections (b)haif,the (c) shall an eoffense affirmative elutio ion of ultralight operator was experiencing engine failure section 111. Any person, as defined in Section 1.07(27)1 Texa3" e7f1 who shall violate any provision of the ordi- nancep shall be ede b d 4 u fine not tosdexce d r'Iwod Hundred nDollars shell ll be punish by ($200,00).. PA6B 2 Section IV. Thls ordinance shell be effective fourteen (14) days a er is passage and approval, The city secretary shall give notice of the passage of this ordinance by causing the cap- tion hereof to be published in the official newspaper in the City of Denton at least twice within ten (10) days after the passage of this ordinance. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1990, Q 6 R, A R i ATTEM JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY i i BYt i j APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORNt i DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY By t 'L j j A I 'r 1 f PAGE 3 j j 1 a k i i CITY COUNCIL t k I I f "tc N t pp 1 4 t f i' F t ORDINANCE N0. - APPROVINQ THE 1990 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DtNTON, TE3(1►Sr APPRAISAL ROLL AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF TH% CITY OF DENTON HERESY ORDAINSi That the City Council hereby approves the 1990 I AppraisaTllQRo~li~ for the City of Denton, Texas in the amount of $1,970,935,351 assessed valuation, based on the Cerdtioie A praisa Roll as approved by the Appraisal Review Boar central Appraisal District. 9ECLON S.Z. That this ordinance shall become effeotive immediately upon its psseage and approval. i PASSED AND APPROVED this the .r._ day of --r 1990s 805 CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTESTi I~ JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY EECRLTARY APPROVED As TO LEGAL FORM iATTORNEY DEBRA A. DMYOVITCH, CITY I By l f fII i S CITY COUNCIL I . i tee, e, ♦ 0 1 d I ~ i i 3 t Ii VII' h DATEI 08/Z1/90 ' CIn COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMI Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager f SUBJECTI 1991-1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) i RECOMMENDATIONI 1 The Planning and toning Commission and the Public Utility Board recommend approval, E 0 SUMMARYt The 1991-1995 CIP contains capital improvements to be undertaken by t the City of Den'on for the next five years, The Utility and Central Government CIP'e are provided separately and each has an executive summary which summarizes the CIP. Detail forms for each prnjact are available in the City secretary's office, BACKOROUNDI The CIP development process followed a three step process of (1) input from staff and the public, (2) consolidation and review by the administrative staff and (3) consideration by PUB, Pia, and the Council, See the attached Calendar of Events, PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTIDt I { Evoryone using Denton'a capital infrastructure. FISCAL IMPACTI Executive Summartea, pages 1.8 and I1-43, rc- 4tym lubm t di / Pr aced Hart* 1 cian a gar r ra n , Robbins, ICP Execntive Director Planning and Development Attachments) 14 Resolution with CIP 2, OUB and P&% Minutes 2216x I i ,t 1 ~.n r r 4r I .L 2856L f RESOLUTION NO. j A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROPOSED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION1 AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE j DATE. WHEREAS, on the 18th day of July, 1990 the Planning and Zoning commission recommended the capital improvements to be con- structed during the forthcoming five year period] and WHEREAS, the City Manager furnished a copy of the recommen- dations to the City Council )n the 21st day of August, 19901 and f WHEREAS, all of the above actions were taken in compliance ! with the requirements of Section 10.03(a){6) of the City Charterl j and Ii WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to formally adopt the rec- ommendations of the Ccmmissionl NOW, THEREFORE, II THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVESi 1 SECTION i. That the Council approves the attached list of capita mprovements proposed to be constructed during the ` forthcoming five year period, i hr SECTION II That this resolution shall become effective f immad a e y upon its passage and approval. 3 i PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of August, 1990, { MXYOR~ BOB CAST EqERRY# r 4 ATTESTI JENNIFER WALTBRS# CITY SECRETARY E ~ k l I APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM] DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BYE 4th Revision t t July 23, 1990 ! CALENDAR OF EVENTS CITY OF DENTON FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND FIVE YEAR GENERAL GOVERNMENT SCHEDULE STEP I - INPUT Planning 4 Zoning Commission *February 149 1990 (Wednesday} holds joint meeting to hear b requests and receive input from ! (Council Chamber!;) public, staff and other community k interests, (Friday) Staff back-up duo manager's office j February 23, 1990 {Frid (staff analysis of requests, cost estimates for proposed and existing projects, location maps and ranking I sheet for new requested projects, ! financial targets). - j j STEP 2 - CONS OLIDATI_ON _AND MANAGEMENT REVIEW June 4, 1990 Monday) Executive Committee reviews General {3,00 P.m.} Government requests and begins to i ( j (Civil Defense Room) formulate recommendation to be for- warded to Planning and toning j Commission. STEP 3 - CONSIDERATION/ADOPTION PUB Final Recommendation } April 11, 1490 {(($°OOep~mY) RIVI I Dofonse Room) { June 27 and Wednesday) Planning and Zoning Commission ;I dicusses the CIP in Work Sessions 1 July 11, 1990 Council Chambors) Planning 4 Zoning Commission July 18, 1940 (Wednesday) holds a public hearing in a special ! ( , I (Co~nJIM, ambers) meeting and considers a recaamenda- tion. Recommended five year CIP prosenvid !of J August 21, 1990 (CivilaDefense Room) City Council for consideration ` t . s 3499,/4 II f. ! i r fMr/ 1 & I Owl ~ f i coo UTILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I The 1991-93 Utility Department Capital Improvements Plan Is based on the 3991-93 Utility Department Planning Forecasts which projects a population increase from 69,626 In 1991 to 77,044 in 1993. This represents an average annual population growth rate of 2.1% per year. The majority of capital expenolturas will be required to serve the new customers being added to the systaml however, some expenaltures are required to upgrade the Wastewater Treatment Plant to meet the latest water quality regulations. , This years tM capital Improvement projects of the Community Services r Divisions are also included. These dlvlsl" are Solid Waste, which Inefudes residential collection, commercial collection and dlsposall Equipment Services, which Includes Fleet Maintenance, Motor Pool and Machine Shop{ and Drainage, which includes Street Sweeping. Since Ufainage will conilnw to be furled from General Government funding sources, this CIP budget will " be reviewed as part of the City's General Government capital Improvement i l planning process. This document Is intended to serve as Al guide as It relates to the capital requirements of the Utlllty and Community Services Departments In their efforts to maintaln the high reliability and service quality of the glectrie, Water and Wastewater systems, and Community Service Divislonss However, due to tM nature of the utility buslnese/ a certain flexibWty is assumed within the document In order to accommodate changes as they occurs The first year of the C1P, Lo., 19!11 Is fairly certain, but thereafter, adjustments may be necossary In futu-e CIP programs to reflect the changing needs of the city. . 1 Page 1 I l , i 1 4 r I . General- UtUltles and Community Services The 1991.93 Five Year Utility System Capital improvement plan projects expenditures of $129,623,000 for capital improvements. This total includes $461828,000 for the Electric Department Improvemenisl $40,431,000 for the Water Department, $42,344,000 for the Wastewater Department. in addition, $8,234,000 for Solid Waste and Community Services Administration! $129,000 for Equipment Services and $7,333,000 for Drainage. For the Utility System, the majority of the funds for capital Improvements will be from the futute We of Utility Revenue Bonds, $92,300,000 and the use of existing revenue bond sales, 312,112,0000 wl'h some funds being Internally generated $13,347,000 from rates with the remainder from "Aid In Construction" $1,109,000 and other Miscellaneous Services $8,177,000 which are primarily from prepaid fees to the City's Motor Pool. The following Is an overview of each Department CIA. I J~ A Electric Department ~ 1 1 The Electric System will require $46.6 million in capital. funds during the 1991-93 period. In accordance with the 1991.93 Forecast (hereafter referred to es "the Forecast"), the Electric. System expects 3,121 new customers to be ~ added. Capital expenditures required for these customers and Improvements to maintain reliable service to existing customers make up the majority of the CIP projects. LJ One new substation wILi be completed in 1991 at a total coat of $1,000,000 of i which $860,000 will be expended In 19900 and will be doubled in site In 1193 at a cost of $600,000. N70,000 will be used for load management programs during the 1991.1993 period. A portion of the overhead Lines miles per j ' year) will be converted . Pogo 2 • / + ilp{r N / I~ 111~iN ~ I x I to underground as part of the City beautification program at a cat of r•. 3300,000 per year. A special overhead to underground electrical conversion project (33.1 mlUIW Is also included for the ueo on University, between 14) I and bell Avenue In 1992. f Two hydroelectric units (one each at Lake Ray Roberts and Lake Lewisville) will be completed In 1991 at an estimated total coat of 35,064,000 lot Lewisvllle and OtI36,000 for Ray Roberts. Additional building space for A Control Dispatch facility and Electric Dputment WowwW will be constructed in 1992 at an estimated cost of $1,300,D00. A combined cycle generating unit Is Projected lt+r 1995 at an estimated cat of $1fy0001000. A f detailed Hating is found at the end of this sectkxn. Aleetrk Department-FwA1 g 3 !funding for the electric projects will be provided from lour main sourcou i i i 1. bald funds, $37.645 million 2. Current revenues, $7.326 million 7. Ald►in-Cawtructlonf 30.340 million i 4. Other sources, $1.506 million Ekecuk band salso are estimated to be $32.5 milion. 'n~ Uedtrk Department-salts Ytawtee t kk E bud on a lorecaated energy Growth rate of 141% to Us aAd an inflation t 'I rate d approximately Sib, the Electric Department aneklpatea the tollowlna rate lnereafa u i itnerease 0 2x O% 5l1 7% These ktoreaaM are primarily duo to inufaees In the OW of Fuel (le., 9.3611 W" iAO$440 In natural {era) and Furchaed Power WMch meke up j awaximawly A% of tM Electric Department budiet. The 6V%W dabs service payments represent 6.1% of the Electric Pop 3 j j s ron Department budget In 1991 and ~ increase to 7.S'R In 1993 with the Increase primarily due io'the proposed 516,000,000 Investment in 1993 of a 30 MW repoweriryl of the City's Spencer Generating Plant. The funds for capital R Improvements derived from current revenue range from l.6% of budget In 1993 to 2.s % In 1997. Water Department The water Utility will add an estimated 1,947 customers during the planning period (from 18,142 in 1991 to 20,039 in 1993) and will have an average annual customer growth rate of approximately 2.4'6. To provide adequate water service, It is anticipated that $40.43 million capita funds will be required over the next five years. The major projects will be the addition of a ten million gallon per day (MGD) water plant and water transmisslon line, at an estimated cost of $189133 million of which it is assumed that the Upper TrWty Regional Water District will fund 49%, one 2 MGD elevated stores* Unk at a cat of $2,403 millWon, and the replacement of miscallareous water lira for a cat of $29419 mWbxu The new water t treatment ~ plant will increase the maximum capacity to 40 MGD. A detailed I listing Is located at On and of this section. j ~ 4 n 'Hater Department-FundlM Funding for the water projects has four major sourceso 1. Bonds, $28.237 mUllon 2. Current revenue, $4.390 million 3. Aid-InConstruction, $0.624 million 4. Other, $6497 million Wateie bond sales are estimated to be $139000,000. it I Page 4 III y i a r rt ~M 4 r, i Water Department-Rate Increases 't It IS anticipated that the Water Deputment will require rate Increases of r 91 92 93 94 93 Increase 12% 12% 12% 3% 1% [irk Thew Increases are primarily due to Increased costs associated with the r payments for the Ray Roberts project, debt service for the new water plant and associated transmission line, the 2 M4 elevated storage tank and the Hartlee Field Rd. Booster Pump Station with ground storage tanks. The $333,000 per year repayment of an outstanding $4.0 million water/wastewater debt to the Electric Department will be pa+tponed during 1991 and 1992. Wastewater Department i The Wastewater Department will add an estimated 1,603 customers during the planning period. The customer count wW increase from 13,042 in 1991 to C 16,643 in M. 11 Improvements and replacements to the Wastewater System are projected to i C cost $42.344 mialm Major capital Items Include expansion of the Wastewater t f Plant from 12 to 13 MGD at an estimated cast of $24.M mWion, owslte sew.x Una at a cat of 51,000 mWlan, replace obsolete sewer lines at a cost "I of $2.076 mlLUon, Implement an Wiltration/inflow correction program ($1.23 m1111on), upgrade several Uft stations ($0.496 mUL WO, tM funding of + development plan waatewater lines ($1.23 million) and purehase miscellaneous equipment ($0.103 million). A detailed listing Is located at tM end of this sealer. i i i i Page S i l f Wastewater Department-Funding r Funding for the wastewater projects will be provided from tour main sourcest 1. Bonds, $33.194 million 2. Current revenue, $3.631 million 3. Ald-In-Construction, $0.143 million 4. Other, $0.374 million Wastewater bond sales are estimated to be $37,000,000. Wastewater Department Rate lncteaed it is anticipated that the Watt( Department will require rate Increases of 92 94 U Increase 9A i2Ab 129< 12% 12>r These rate inCteases are prlmarlly the result of the required Wastewater Treatment Plant expansion. j 1 ~ SaHO Waste Div Won The Solis Waste Division is estimated to have 1=648114 service requirements equal to the rate of population growth, I.e., approttlmately 2A to Z.I%• Although the long range plans tot the Solid Waste division are not finailsed at the present time, for purposes of this piano it was assumed that the city would remain in the buslness of collecting all residential solid waste, the same i Page 6 i i i i ~ i phase of the commercial solid waste as in 1990 and that' the city would r continue to provide solid waste disposal for its own collection services, plus 30% which pretenriy represents the contract haulers' volumes. This scenario necaaitates this development of another landfill site by 199, since Denton's present site on!y has 1,2009000 cubic yards of volume avallable, and total annual fill :ate is presently 300,000 cubic yards, i.e., residential 909000 cubic t yara;, commercial 100,000 cubic yards, contract haulers, 100,000 cubic yards and miscellaneous 10 to 209000 cubic yards. U a different long range scenario is implemented, the proposed CIP will need to be modified. l The improvements and replacements required by the Solid Waste Division and Community Service Administration Is $8,263,000 during the Five You CIP j period. The major expenditures are for mobile equipment, $1936190000 new landfiU,5690W,000 (1993), front load equipment for commercial collection, $193,0000 and curbside recycling, $95,000. i Solid waste Div Wan-Funding Funding for the Solid waste projects wiU be provided from three main murcom i 1. Bonds, $6 million j i 2. Current revenue, $588,000 3. OtMr, SIA" million 1 i 1. Solid Waste Div Wort-Rate Ltcreaan I Present reaidentki rata w $9.39 per 30 day period. Since a high degree of wrArtainty exists about tre tong range plans of the Solid Waste Division, no projectiona were developed for future rates. I i Page 7 f I v FQuloment Services Division j s The Equipment Services Division, which includes Fleet Maintenance, Motor, pool and Machine Shop, Is estimated to have capital requirements of S114,OW over the 1991 to 1993 time period. These expenditures are primarily for Rest replacement and machine shop tooling and are expected to be primarily funded from current revenue derived from the rates charged to the various divisions and departments for garage and machine shop services. i t 672701-g Page 8 1 1 i w. PIT 20-Apt•90 1991 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OSibl AM ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT x 10001 ' BOND CURRENT AID-IN PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER j FISCAL YEAR 91 91-0251.01 IMPROVEMENTS TO REDUCE CYCLING I $1S$ 70 $155 $00 $0 91-0251-02 POwU PLANT EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS 15 0 15 1 'a 91.02Si•03 0lTICEIFACILITY EQUIPMENT, FIYTU 105 0 105 0 0 i 91-0251-04 POWER PLANT IMPROVEMENTS 91-0251-05 OVERHAUL UNIT 3 TURBINE/GENLRATO 265 0 0 o zes 0 0 91-0251-06 LIWISVILLE HYDROELtCTRIC PROJECT 1750 3175 0 70 0 91.0251-01 RAY ROREAT9 HYDROLLCTRIC SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTION '$1,121• $545 $291 $0 $265 91-0258-01 RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING $11 $32 $0 $470 $0 91-0258.02 STREET LIGHTS - ARTERIAL 173 113 35 0 3S 0 0 91.0258.03 STREET LIGITINO - SECURITY 0 0 91-0258-04 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND 9QUIPMIN 5 0 ......5 SVI-TOTAL ELECT STREET LIGHTS 292 205 40 47 0 V 91-0252-01 Old IITIN6ION$ L IMPROVEMENTS $452 $452 $0 $0 $0 1 0 91.0252-02 POWER !ACTOR IMPROVLMMI $100 too 0 91.0252.03 UMDEROROUMD UTBNSION6 L INTROVII $617 $17 0 0 0 0 I 91.0252.04 TRANBTORKM L got" ENT $611 621 0 0 0 41-0252.05 MOTOR POOL RIPLACtMINT $178 0 56 0 122 91.0252.04 MISCILLANE08M$ TOOLS AND EQUIPMIN $60 o so 0 0 M 91.0252.07 RIOT-Of-WAY LAIEMtNTI } 91-0252.06 "'IN M]C PIIDLR COMM RtPLAC $170 0 3170 00 0 0 91.0252-09 O/M TO UNDEROROm CONYtRSIONI $;00 0 26 0 0 91-0252.10 NC41LA DATA TERMINALS/ACILITIII $$26 500 6 0 ' Of LLICIR 0 91025 I 2-11 PURC6Wt 0 91-0252.12 M]SCILLANtOU$ OFFICE LQOIP/fURNI $S 0 5 0 . 1 SUI•TOTAL WCTRIC DISTRIBUTION 1,099 21290 687 0 122 91-0253.01 METIRS A" ASSOCIATED tQUITMENT $90 $54 $31 $0 $6 91-0253.02 MOBILE LQUIPNENT REPLACEMENT 153 1S 0 91-0253-03 NISCtLLANt0U6 TOOLS 6 EQUIPMENT 15is 0 0 150 i0 0 0 91-0253.04 LOAD MANACINENT PROGRAM 27 O 27 0 0 91.0251.03 MILE DATA tLRMINALS 909•TOTAL UtCTRIC M1111100 300 204 B8 0 8 Page 9 i I Fill J k,. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1991 C r P~- - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVIMM PLAN OSs41 AM ELECTRIC DEPARTMLWT 0 x 1000) t PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN ff NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REYBNUE CONSTR OTHER FISCAL YEAR 91 i 91-0254-01 NOBILE DATA REPEATER $30 $30 $0 $0 $0 j 91-0254-02 NISCLLLAN90US TOOLS i EQUIPNENT $20 0 20 0 0 91-0254-03 TLLEPRONE INTERCONNECT SYSTLN. $36 0 36 0 0 91-0254.04 SHOP CEILINO INSTALLATION $B 0 E 0 0 91-0254-05 PURCHASE VEHICLE $401 $13 0 13 0 0 91-0254.06 B0OMHZ SECURENET $37 l8 19 0 0 91-0254-07 RADIO EQUIPNEN? CAPACITOR CONTRO $40 0 40 0 0 SUE-TOTAL ELECT CO*WICASIONS 184 48 1J6 0 0 91-0255-01 AUDRA SUBSTATION CONSTRUCTION $140 $140 $0 $0 $0 i 91.0255.02 RLPLACL 69 KV BRLAKLRI $12 E2 0 0 0 91-0255.0) SCADA LQUI►NLNT $50 0 SO O 0 91-0255-04 SUBSTATION SCREENING (AIRPORT) $75 15 0 0 0 II 91-0255-05 PURCHASE COIMERCIAL RIDING LASAIN $14 0 14 0 0 91-025$-06 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS i LQUIPMLNT $2S 0 25 0- ~'-.-0 SUB-TOTAL LLLCT SUBSTATIONS 386 297 69 0 0 I1 i 1 91-0250-01 NISCLLWI1001 OFFICL LQUIPNLMT/F $11 $0 $79 $0 $0 91.0250-02 MOLILL vNih LNI $15 0 B 0 7 91.0250-03 013 $40 0 40 0 0 j II c SUR-TOTAL LLLCT ADMINISTRATION 133 0 126 0 1 ,REVISLD TOTAL$ FOR TLAR - 1991 CIP 5,515 3,569 1,457 47 422 s f ~ I i Page 10 i _ w i N . ~ ( CAPITAL IN~OVEMENT P_RO~lECT ~ C + F20;-Apr-90 1491 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN i41 AM ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT (0 E 1000) k BOND CURRENT AID-IN e PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTRUC OTHER 1 FISCAL YEAR 92 N 92.0251-01 POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS $30 $0 $30 $0 SO 92-0251-02 OFFICE/FACILITY EQUIPMENT, FIETU $17 0 17 0 0 ! 92.0251-03 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $46 0 35 0 11 92-0251-04 POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT $270 0 270 0 0 92-0251-05 OVERHAUL UNIT No. 4 TURBINE GENE $195 0 0 0 195 92-0251-06 CHEMICAL CLEANING BOILERS No.19 0120 0 0 O 120 i SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 678 0 352 0 326 92-0258.01 RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING $92 $0 $37 $55 $0 j 92-02S8-02 STREET LIGHTS - ARTERIAL $159 159 0 0 0 92-0258-03 STREET LIGHTING • SECURITY -...$40- 0 40 0 .--0 f SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC STREET LIGH7I 291 IS9 77 SS 0 ,I 92.0251-01 O/K EETENSIONS 6 IMQROVEMENTS $444 $444 $0 $0 SO { j 92-0252-02 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS $105 $IOS 00 $0 $0 91-0252-03 UNDERGROUND EETENSIONS At IMPROVE 1716 $716 $0 $0 $0 92.0252-04 TRANBPORMERS i EQOIPMLNT $638 $638 10 $0 $0 ` 92.0252-05 NO; POOL WLACEMENT $226 $0 $41 $0 $137 92-0252.06 MIECELLANBOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEII $100 00 $100 $0 $0 1 91-0252.07 1I081VOF-VAT EABEWENI $55 $55 00 $0 $0 92.0152.06 ECONOMIC PEEDLR CONDUCTOR WLAC $205 $20S 10 00 $0 92.0252-09 ON TO U110EROROU110 CONVERltONb 42*400 $0 $0 10 SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 4,191 4,563 191 0 137 j { L ~ 92.0253.01 MSTELS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT $106 167 039 $0 $0 92-0253-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 34 0 9 0 30 91.0253.03 MEBCELLANLOUS TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 20 0 20 0 0 92.0253.04 LOAD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 165 0 165 0 0 SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC METERING 330 b1 233 0 30 ; i 1 s Page It i I j ~:••'•r• ypp ,eue•ut Don.tECT r CAPITA IR_ O~L~z~ • i 20-Apt-90 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAM ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT OS M AM (3 11000) i, 80ND CUIRENT AID-to PROJECT TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER s NIMRER PROJECT DESCRIPTION. K FISCAL YEAR 92 $20 $O $20 10 30 k ' 92-0254-01 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS i EQUIPMENT $30 $0 $30 $0 $0 1 92.0254-02 RADIO INTECONNECT T1QA, DRAZ03, $30 $0 $30 30 $0 ` 92-0254-03 AUTOMATIC VEHICLE LOCATION $20 $0 $20 30 92-0254.04 REPLACE S.C.A.D.A. CRT'S $40 30 $40 92.0254-OS RADIO IQUIPMINT CAPACITOR CONTRO ._...54. so • SUb-TOTAL ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION ••140 140 0 0 $86 $86 $0 $0 30 V 92-0255-01 REPLACE 69 IY BREAKERS 0 1S 0 0 0 92.O1SS-02 REPLACE SUISTA. tMIRO. INTERPHON 1Q0 100 0 0 92.0255-03 TRANSFORMER RODILIZATION 0 7 0 7 92-0255-04 MOBILE IQUIPMEIIT RIPLACEMENT #55 14 0 0 30 0 30 92.0255.05 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS i IQUIPMIN? SUR-TOTAL ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS 245 116 52 0 92-0250-01 MISCILLANE0U8 OFFICE IQUIPMINTIF $180 $0 $180 $0 SO IS 0 1S 0 0. 92.0250-02 MOTOR POOL 0 45 0 4S 0 0 . a i 0 92.0250.03 OI8 1,S00 1,500 ' 92-0250-04 NEW SERVICE !AGILITY SUD-TOTAL ILLCTRIC ADM. MISC. 1,740 11500 240 0 0 ` F, 1 TOTALS FOR YEAR ' 1992 CIP 80315 6,475 16265 SS 500 Page 12 I i Fir, CAPITet iuoan~~uFRIT Iasle.lECT x 20-Apr-90 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OSi41 AM ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT is E 1000) I i PlOlECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN l NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUR CONSTRUC OTHER E i i FISCAL YEAI 93 j j 93-0251-01 GAS PIPELINE $1,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 93-0251-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 11 0 3 0 8 93-02S1-03 POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS SO O 50 0 0 93-0251-04 OFFICtIFACILITY EQUIPMENT, FIETU is 0 is 0 0 93-0251-05 POWER PLANT IMPROVEMENTS ISO 0 ISO 0 0 93-0251-06 OVERHAUL UNIT No. S TUR3102 GENE 210 0 0 0 210 SUS-TOTAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 1,439 1,000 221 0 216 93-0256-01 RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING $124 $0 $50 $74 $0 ` 93-0256.02 STREET LIGHTS - ARTERIAL 56 56 0 0 0 93-0256.03 STREET LIGHTING - SECURITY 45 0 ° ....................s ° SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC STREET LIGHTI 227 $6 95 14 0 j { i f 93-0251-01 0/9 LETtNSION$ 6 IMPROVENIATS $445 $445 $0 $0 so i J 93-0252.02 POWER FACTOR IMPROV9NINTS 1110 $110 10 $0 $0 I 93.0252-03 UNDERORO MD EETEN$tOws 6 IMPRovb $$57 $657 $0 $0 40 93-0252-04 & 9QUIFWW 90 00 $0 93-0252.05 MO FOR FPOOOLL R91PLACIMM $$41 $710 $$31 40 $56 93-0251.06 NISCSLLANSOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEM $125 $0 $115 00 $0 93-0252-07 RION?-OF-WAY EASEMENTS $60 $0 $60 $0 $0 93.0252-06 ECONOMIC FEEDER CONDUCTOR REPLAC $210 $210 so $0 10 93-0252-09 011 TO UNDERGROUND CONVERSIONS $300 $300 60 s0 0 1 1 SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC DI$TRI6UTIOK 3,146 2,610 401 0 SS I 93-0253-01 METERS AIM ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT $130 $76 $52 so 50 93-0253.02 MOBILE tQUtPMUT REPLACEMENT 27 0 9 0 l6 ' 93-0253-03 MISCILLAN1001 TOOLS 4 EQUIPMENT 23 0 23 0 0 93.0253-04 LOAD MANAG&MBMT PROGRAM 115 175 0 0 0 SUB-TOTAL tLECTRIC MITERING 355 253 14 0 is a Page 13 i ^ ^ CAPRAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT _ t t . * 20-Apr-90 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 05141 AM ELECTRIC DElARS?IEliT (6 Y 1000) PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER PRO-IECT DESCRIPTION. TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTRUC OTHER i FISCAL YEAR 93 II 93-0254-01 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS 6 EQUIPMENT $2S $0 $25 $0 $0 1 93-0254-02 RADIO EQUIPMENT CAPACITOR CONTRO 40 0 40 0 0 93.0254-03 REPLACE VEHICLE 5420 15 0 0 0 15 93-0254-04 UTILITY DISPATCH RADIO 6 TELEPHO 7 0 7 0 0 SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION 81 0 72 0 IS j ttt' 93-0255.01 HICKORY SUBSTATION AC1 RETROFIT $166 Olaf $0 $0 SO I! 93-0255.02 REPLACE 69 KV BREAKERS 90 90 0 0 0 i 93-0155-03 EXTEND VTR/SVR FACILITIES TO AIR 20 20 0 0 0 3 93-02SS-04 PURCHASE TRACTOR FOR SUBSTATIONS 40 0 40 0 0 93-0255-05 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS 6 EQUIPMENT 30 0 30 0 0 93-02SS-06 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT #55 16 0 6 0 a SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS 364 296 7E 0 6 93-0250-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/F $65 $0 $45 $0 $0 i 93-0250.02 CIS 50 0 SO 0 0 , SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC ADM. MISC. 135 0 13S 0 0 TOTAL$ FOR YEAR - 19,03 CIP %773 40269 1,093 74 317 rr. I ~ E ' 1 Page 14 i I i r ! - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRO.IECT 20-Agr-90 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 05:41 AM ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT (S x 1000) PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION_ TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTRVC OTHER FISCAL YEAR 94 ~ I 94-0151-01 POWER PLAN? EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS $SO $O $50 $O SO 94-0251-02 OFFICE/FACILITY EQUIPMENT, FIITU 19 0 19 0 0 94-0251-03 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 16 0 4 0 12 96.0251-04 POWER PLANT IMPROVEMENTS 900 0 900 0 0 SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 965 0 973 0 12 94.0258-01 RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING $132 $0 $53 779 90 94-0258-02 ST191T LIGHTS - ARTERIAL 19 29 0 0 0 94-0258-03 STREET LIGHTING - SECURITY SO 0 SO 0 0 SUE-TOTA1. ELECTRIC STREET LIGHTI 211 29 103 79 0 i 94-0252-01 0/8 UTRNSIONS 6 IMPROVEMENTS $556 $S56 $0 $0 So t 94-0232-02 POWIR FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS 120 120 0 0 0 i 94-0252-03 UNDERGROUND EITUIIONS 6 IMPROVE 945 945 0 0 0 94-0252-04 TRAMfFORMIRS i EQUIPMENT 960 960 0 0 0 94-0252-05 NOBILI EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 69 0 13 0 56 i 94-0252-06 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND RQUIPMRN 130 0 130 0 0 r 94-0252-07 1101IT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS 65 65 0 0 0 f 94.0252.08 ECONOMIC FEEDER CONDUCTOR REPLAC 215 215 0 0 0 j 94-0252-09 0/1 TO UNDUCIOUND CONVERSIONS 300 300 0 0 0 I SUE-TOTAL ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 31360 3,161 143 0 56 I 94.0253.01 MITERS AIM ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT $132 879 $53 $0 $0 94.0253.02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 30 0 16 0 14 94.0253-03 REPLACE METER TISTSOARD SO SO 0 0 0 94.0253-04 LOAD MANAOIMENT PROGRAM 165 185 0 0 0 94.0253.OS TOOLS AIM EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 20 0 20 0 0 SUE-TOTAL ELECTRIC MITERING 417 314 59 0 14 f ~ I • Page 1S I r / t ~ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJIECT P ~y Y 20-Apr-90 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 05x41 AN ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT __--(1,-x 1000) PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN I l NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION. TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTRUC OTHER ` ' FISCAL YEAR 94 94-0254-01 NISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEN $35 10 125 10 10 94.0254.02 RADIO EQUIPMENT CAPACITOR CONTRO 40 0 40 0 0 94.0234.03 REPLACE VEHICLE 5404 IS 0 0 0 15 94.0254.04 REPLACE VINTAGE RADIO REPEATERS 60 60 0 0 0 00 SUS-TOTAL ELECTRIC COWMtCATION 140 60 65 0 1S 94.0235.01 RETROFIT 81EAKERS (LOCUST 4 WORT 1260 1260 10 10 10 j 94-0255.02 REPLACE 69 KV 311A US 95 95 0 0 0 A 94.0255.03 INSTALL MTR/SNR AT NORTHLAKES 19 10 10 0 0 0 94.0255.04 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS L EQUIPMENT 30 0 30 0 0 94-0255.05 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT HS 20 0 10 0 10 ' 101-TOTAL ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS 415 365 40 0 10 1 94.0250.01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EOUIPPMT/F 190 10 190 10 $0 94-0250.02 MOTOR POOL 16 0 8 0 S { 94.0250.03 011 60 O 60 0 0 SUS-TOTAL ELECTRIC ADM. MISC. 164 0 158 0 6 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIF S,&94 3,929 1,571 79 115 I{ ' r Page 16 A ~w4..r WpW~ I { 1 • J envaSiFIJT ~SSd1ECT _ C ±~LIMP Y 20•Apr•90 1991 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN I 09A41 AN ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT { (S 11000) f f BAND CURRENT AID•IN PROJECT TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTRUC OTHER S NUMIER PROJECT DESCRIPTION y FISCAL YEAR 95 i 95-0251.01 OAS TVRRINR COMEINED CYCLE 016,000 $161000 $0 $O 00 ff 95.0251.02 POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS 75 0 75 0 0 1 ' 75 95.0251.07 OffICElFACSLITY EQi11tMINT, fIxTU 1720 5 0 175 0 0 95.0151.04 POWER PLANT IIQROYEMINTS SUS-TOTAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 16,270 16,000 210 0 0 l i ~ 95.0251.01 RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING $142 2$0 $570 $655 $0 261 95.0256.02 STREET LIMM • ARTERIAL S 95.0251.07 STREET LIONl1N0 - SECURITY 53 0 53 0 SVg.TOTAL ELECTRIC STREET LIGHTI 460 235 I10 6$ 0 ` j j I 95.0252.01 O/M IITENSIONS 6 IMPROVEKENTS $496 $496 $0 $0 $0 125 Us 95.0252-02 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS 9S•0252.03 UNDRRGROUND UMSIONS i iMPROVL 959 0 959 O 95.0252.04 TRANSFORMERS 6 EQUIPMENT 1, 1,0000 65 0 107 95-0282.0$ MOTOR POOL REPLACEMENT 172 95.0252.06 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEN 115 00 135 0 0 0 93.02$2.01 11081-61•WAY &"&NMI 75 95.0252.06 ECONOMIC FERDER CONDUCTOR RgPLAC 22S 229 0 0 0 95.0152.09 0!1 TO UNDERGROUND CONVUSIONS ....300 ...300 { SVE•TOILL ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 11487 2,146 10274 0 101 j ~ f I f 9S-02S3.01 METERS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT $144 $670 $54 $0 0 13 95.0257.02 MOTOR POOL REPLACEMENT 95.0253.63 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS ANn EQUIPKEN 20 0 20 0 0 195 0 95.0257.04 LOAD MANAORMENT PROGRAM 195 $US•TOTAL ELECTRIC METERING 376 262 at 0 13 i t :I Page 17 RAI y *,I fueonwsuFR~T t~110.fECT ~p--- f 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL 1141IOYEMENT PLAN 20-APT-90 ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT OSM AM X 1000) PROJECT IOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMEER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTROC OTNER FISCAL YEAR 95 9S-0254-01 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS 4 EQUIPMENT $30 10 $30 $0 40 95-0254-02 RADIO EQUIPMENT CAPACITOR CONTRO 40 40 0 0 0 95.0254.03 MAIN OATS RADIO CONTROLLED CAMER 4 0 4 0 0 E 95-0254-04 ENLARGE RADIO SHOP AREA 6. 0 6 0 0 { SUS-TOTAL ELECTRIC CONMNICATION EO 40 40 0 0 1 I 9S-0255-01 DUPLEX AUDRA SUESTATION $600 $600 $0 $0 i0 95-0255.02 EATTERY REPLACEMENT - NORTMLAEES 10 10 0 0 0 9S-0255.03 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS k EQUIPMENT 30 0 30 0 0 f SUs-TOTAL ELECTRIC SUSSTATIONS 640 610 30 0 0 i t 95.0250-O1 NIICELLANIOUS OFFICE EQUIPMEN11F 38 $O $95 $O 0 6 32 95.0250.02 NOTOR POOL 65 0 65 0 0 95.0250-03 OS{ SUE-TOTAL ELECTRIC ADM- MISC. 191 0 166 0 32 E TOTAL{ FOR YEAR - MS CI! 216531 190363 16931 ES 352 p GRAND TOTAL{ 1991 - 1995 Cif 46,821 371645 70337 340 1,506 + 4 ~ I I l Y 1 j ~ i Page 1g i 1 m ~.6if!br q It TF3T l 4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT i' 20-Apr-90 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROYEMENT ?LAN { 10113 AM WATER DEPARTMENT 1000) PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTNIRI i I'l CAL YEAR 9i 91.0450-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE IQUIPMINT/M $3 $0 $3 $0 $01 f 1 ......I } SOS-TOTAL HATER ADMINISTRATION 7 0 3 0 Oi I i f 91.0460.01 RAY ROBERTS WTP 6 RAH WTR FACILITI $6,834 $4,505 $0 $0 $4,329 91.0440-02 TINISN HATER TRANSMISSION LINE 839 629 0 0 210 91.0460-03 SOOSTER STATION it SYSTIM TII-IN 5,326 5,326 0 0 0 91.0460-04 OFFICE FURNITURI 4 0 4 0 0 91.0460.05 NEW CONTINUOUS TURBIDITY 110NITORIN 13 0 13 0 0 91.0460.06 SAFETY CLIMIINO DEVICES TO ELEVATE 5 0 5 0 0 91.0460.07 NEW PORTASLI RADIO$ (2) i PORTABLE 7 0 7 0 0 91.0460.04 MOS M IQUIPNIMT 25 0 17 O a SUB-TOTAL HATER PRODUCTIOM 156053 10,460 46 0 40547 j 91.0460.01 LABORATORY CAIEWM NAtNTINANCI $3 $0 $3 $O $0 91-0460-02 OtV111011 INFORMATION MAKAOIMENT BY 1 0 1 0 0~ 91.0460-03 RIPLACI ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROP 22 22 0 0 0l 91.0440-04 PORTABLE FIELD OINEIATOR 1 0 l 0 01 91.0480-05 MOBILE KQUIPMSNT (1) 16 0 ......6 0. .....6I SUB-MAL WATER LABORATORY .....47. 22 13 0 41 I s 91.0463.01 OIB $10 $0 $10 $0 r $0 91-0463-02 FIELD EQUIPMENT 1 0 1 0 O 91.0463.03 OFFICE totPMINT AND FURNITURE 2 0 2 0 0 ' ..1..1- SOB-TOTAL WATER EN02NEE11NO 13 0 13 0 0 f j I k i Page 19 1r Fl r ps F r CAPITA, ieeeeAVEMENTE OJECT fJr'.., I r 20-Apr-90 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1013 AN WATER DEPARTMENT j (4 a 1000) } k BOND CURRENT AIDOW PROJECT NV .R PlOJtCT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUt CONSTR OTHER FISCAL•YtAR 91 91-0461.01 OVE1$129 WATER LIME! $150 1150 10 $0 10 91-0461-02 NOBILL 9QUIP"W 80 0 33 0 47 91-0461.03 WATER TAPE, LOOPS ISO 0 0 160 0~ 91-0481.04 REPLACE PIKE HYDRANT! 6 VALVtf 52 0 S2 0 D i 91.0461-05 RLPLACL WATER LIME STREET ?ROORAM 200 0 200 0 0~ 91-0461-06 REPLACE MISC. WATER LIMBS 46 0 48 0 0 91.0461.07 MISC. tWIPKW 25 0 2 1 91.0461.06 DIST'RIBU'TION SYSTIM UPGRADE WATER 1S3 15S 0 0 0 91.0461-09 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTUI WILL ISO 0 ISO 0 0 f 91.0461-10 DEVUOPNXNT PLAN WATQ LINES 13S 250 0 35 0 0 0 91.0461.11 MOBILE DATA TERMINAL! 3S 0 0 91.0461.12 PLOW MITIRS (bee Of flOV) 25 0 25 0 0 90.0481-XX REPLACE MISC. WATER LWH 279 279 0 O 4 SUB-TOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION 10629 834 $69 Igo 47 91-0482-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $17 10 117 10 10 91.0462.02 WATER MITERS 114 O 11 0 0 91.0462-03 NISCILLANt0111 Wl""? S 0 5 S 4 0 91-0462.04 MOSILI DATA TWIINALI 20 0 20 0 0 SUS-TOTAL WATER MITERING 156 0 156 0 0 i TOTAL 1991 CIP 16,697 111316 799 1B0 41602 j j• i kk 1 Page 20 7T %7 1 I s'- 2 ADITAI ILOQA1~e•u rr esw , ~ h ~ rnvdi:~. i t0~13 AM WATER DtFARTMIN7 : 1000) PROJECT NUMS BOND QUINT AID-IN PROJECT TOTAL FUND RIVINUI CONSTR OTHERI ►IlCAL YIA1 91 f I 92-0450-01 NISCILLANIOUS OFFICt EQUIPM&STlFUR 14 $0 $4 $0 801 1 • . !Ua•TOTAL WATER ADMINiSTiUTION 0 4 0 0 j 91.0460-02 FINISH WATER TRANSMISSION LIN! E 92-0460-01 DISINFLCTION SYSTEM MODIFICATION $4400 3,729 00 $O $1,241 92.0460.02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 400 0 0 01 ` 92.0460-03 OFFICE FURNITURI 24 0 !4 0 30~ 92-0460.04 PIGGING RAW WATER LINT! 5 0 92.0460.03 2 NO ELEVATIO STORAOR TANK 300 300 0 0f 2,400 21400 0 0 0 ........53 i !DB-foTAt WATER PNODUCTtoN a'101 6,829 19 0 1,2 9200480-01 LABORATORY CAatWORK NAINTINANCE $2 $O 12 $O SO 92-0460-02 DIVISION INFORMATION MANA DiM Sy 2 0 2 0 92.0410.03 GAS CMRONAT00RAPM/MASS SP9CTROPNOT 21 21 0 0 0 f 92-0480.04 1ESERVOIR MOMtToRINO EQUIPNUT' 14 0 14 0 0 92.04$0-05 WATER DISTILLATION UNIT 3 0 3 0 0 1 92-0490.06 LABORATORY SINK FUME 8000 r 2 0 2 0 0 ! i !US-TOTAL WATER LABORATORY 44 21 23 0 0 9:•0861.01 all $s $o $s $o 90 92.0463.02 111M 9QUIPNENT 1 0 1 0 0 92.0463-03 OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND PURNITURE 1 0 1 0 0+ 801-TOTAL WATER AMOINISRINO l 0 7 0 0 I 92.0461.01 OVUSI29 WATER LIN98 92.0461.02 MOBILE $1S0 =130 10 $O $O EQ0IPM9NT 109 0 51 S1 0 5q 92.0461.03 WATER TAPI, LOOPS 94 0 0 94 92.0461.04 REPLACE 1I11 MYDRANTS 6 VALVIS S9 0 S8 0 P 92.0461.05 REPLACE WATER LINE STREET PROORAM 200 0 200 0 0 92.0461.06 REPLACE MISC. WATER LINES 54 27 27 0 0 92-0461.07 MISC. EQUIPMINT IS 0 1S 0 0 92.0461-08 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER LINTS 250 2SO 0 0 0 92-0461.09 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE WATER 250 250 0 0 0 I 92.0461.10 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTIM INFILL 130 0 ISO 0 0 91.0461.06 11PLAC9 MISC. WATER LINES 274 137 137 0 0 91-0461.08 DISTRIBUTION SYlItH UPORAOE WATER 900 900 0 0 0 SUB-TOTAL WATER DISTRISUTION 2,504 1,714 61$ 94 •••-9a J i Page 21 1 1 t CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT pAOJKT 25-Apr-90 CAPITAL 10113 AN 114Th DIPAITMINT (0 x 1000) PROJECT BOND CVRIINT AID-IN j NUNSII PROJECT DOCRIPTION TOTAL PVND RIYINVS CONSTR OTH&A 4 PIRAL Y1AR 92 I 92-0462.01 NOSILI IQIIIPNIIIT 017 $0 09 00 $6 I 92-0462-02 11ATU NITUS 120 0 120 0 0 i I 92-0462-03 11ISCILIMNOUS IQUIPNINT 4 0 4 0 0 j SUPTOTAL 11ATII NITIIINO 141 0 133 0 6 i i TOTAL 1992 CIP 10,601 I6S64 124 94 11319 a f I Page 22 'r r t ~ . M CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTPBOJECT T7 ,r 4 r~ - Pr• - 10113 AM WATER DLPARTMANT 0 a 1000) i PROJECT BOND CURAENT AID-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER FISCAL YEAR 93 i i 93-0450.01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FUR $5 $O $5 $0 SO; 93-0450.02 M COMPUTER $A 60 66 $0 W SUB-TOTAL WATER ADMINISTRATION 13 0 13 0 O + 93-0460-01 NEW AOOSTU PUMP UPPER PRISSURA PL 65 565 $O $O $01 93-0460-02 MOBILE IQOIPMLR 35 0 4 0 311 93-0460.03 OPIICS ►URNITURI 20 0 20 0 0 93.0460.04 TOOLS 6 EQUIPMENT 2S 0 25 0 01 93.0460.05 OEONATION DISINFECTION SYSTLI 450 340 0 0 ..110` 1 SUB-TOTAL WATER PRODUCTION 595 40S 49 0 1411 93-04S0.O1 LABORATORY CASIWORX MAINTENANCE 3 60 $3 $O 60 93-0460.02 DIVISION IMfORl4 TIOV MANAOtMNT SY 1 0 1 0 0111111 93-0460.03 REPLACIMNT Of LABORATORY 9QUIPKU 1 6 1 0 01 93.0410-04 WATERSIED MONITORINO STATION S 0 S 0 0 93.0460.05 ADMINISTRATION SUILDINO RNIOVATION 21 21 0 0 0 ` i SUS-TOTAL WATER LABORATORY 31 21 10 0 0 93.0463.01 FIELD EQUIPMENT $1 $0 $1 $0 S01 93-0463.02 Off ICS 9QUIPMINT AND FURNITURA 1 0 1 0 0 SDI-TOTAL WATER U41MKUIWO 2 0 2 0 01 i f 93-0461-01 OVIRSIEE WATER LINES $150 $150 $O 10 60 i 93.0461.02 MOBILE tQUIPNEMT 116 0 SO 0 66 93-0461.63 WATER TAPS, LOOPS 93.0461.04 RM ACS FIRE HYDRAMT6 6 VALVtS S1 0 51 50 0 f 93.0461.05 IMUCS WATER LINT STREET PROGRAM 200 0 200 0 0 i 93-0461.06 REPLACE MISC. WATER LIMES 52 0 52 0 0, 93.0461.01 MISCELLANEOUS IQUIPMENT 1S 0 IS O 0) j 93.0461.06 DEVtLOPMINT PLAN WATER LINES 250 250 0 0 01 93.0461.09 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPORADt WATER 162 162 0 0 0 93.0461.10 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM IN►ILL ISO 0 ISO 0 0 92-0461.06 REPLACE MISC. WATER LINKS 312 156 156 0 0 92.0461-09 DISTRIBUTION SYSTIM UPORAD9 WATER 11000 10000 0 0 0 41.0461.06 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPORADA VATU S00 SOO 0 0 0 Y ...1.... SUS-TOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION 3,036 2,23E 660 SO 66 t Page 23 i 1 1 rsvw li Fll~ 77CAP IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 19193 ZAPITAL irmnrliOVgNZN-r PLAN 10113 AM WATER DEPARTMENT (1 r 1000) PROJECT AND CURALNT AID-IN NVMILR PROJICT DESCRIPTION TOTAL POND LEVENOL COMSTR OTHERf FISCAL YEAR 93 93-0462-01 Mollu LQUIPMLNT 117 10 63 60 114 93.0462.02 WATER MITERS 126 0 126 0 OI 93-0462.03 MISCELLANEOUS LQVIPMENT S 0 S 0 OI 401-TOTAL WATER MtTLRINO 141 0 134 0 14` III TOTAL 1993 CIP 30131 20670 616 SO 123 I i i I ~ I y a Y ,1, I A) f k I i Page 24 i t~ L i k CAPITAL 1MPROVEMW PR0jECT 20•Apr-40 1991 • 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 10°13 AM WATER DEPARTMENT (0 s 1000) PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER PROJECT D93CRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER! M 5 k t FISCAL YEAR 94 V ~ low# 94-0450-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FUR 16 $0 $6 $0 $0 SUB-TOTAL WATER ADMINISTRATION 6 0 6 0 0 94-0460.01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $16 $0 $4 $0 $12; 94-0460-02 OFFICZ FURNITURE 6 0 6 0 0. 93-0460.05 OEONATION DISINFECTION SYSTEM 2,675 2,020 0 0 655° ......I SUS-TOTAL WATER PRODUCTION 20697 2,020 10 0 6671 ,i 94.0480.01 INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA SPECTRO $20 $20 $0 $0 $01 94-0480.02 DIVISION INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SY 1 0 1 0 0 94-0490-03 LABORATORY EQUIPMENT 3 0 3 0 0 94-0460-04 WA?USHBD MONITORING PROORAN. 6 0 6 0 0 SUB-TOTAL WATER LABORATORY 30 10 10 0 01 I ; 94.0463.01 FIELD tQUIPMENT $1 $0 $1 $0 so j 94.0463.02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1 0 1 0 d ......I SUS-TOTAL WATER L14011199RINO 2 0 2 0 0 1 94.0461.01 OVUS1E9 WATER LINES $150 1150 $0 $0 =b 94.0461-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 29 0 5 0 24 94.0461-03 WAME TANS, LOOPS s0 0 0 s0 0 94.0461.04 REPLACE ttRt BYDRANTS B VALVES 61 0 61 0 0 94.0461.05 RRPLACR WATER LINt.STEItT PROGRAM 200 0 200 0 0 94.0461.06 RRPLACI MISC. WATER LINES s0 0 s0 0 94.0461.07 MISC. WIFNIXT 1S 0 is 0.- 94-0461-06 0011LONG" PLAM WATER LINES 250 250 0 0 ! 94.0461.01 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPORADt WATER 176 111 0 0 94.0461.10 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM WILL ISO 0 ISO 0 93-0461-06 REPLACS MISC. WATER LINES 293 0 293 0 93.0461.09 DISTRINTION SYSTEM UPGRADE WATER ISO 750 0 0 } 92.0461-09 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE WATER $71 $71 0 0 0 O SUB-TOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION 30047 2,199 774 S 24 94.0462.01 WATER MSTERS i 133 40 1131 10 94.046202 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 1S 0 is 0 SUS-TOTAL WATER MITERING 146 0 141 0 TOTAL 1994 CIF 5,930 4,239 450 SO 69 ! Page 25 ° 1 I r I Y CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRO.I rT J s r;:,,., 20-Apr•90 1991 • L99 COITAL IMPROVEMENT ( 10113 AN WATER DEPARTMENT ($2100) PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER FISCAL YEAR 95 I 95.0450-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FUR $7 10 $7 $O 10 SUS-TOTAL WATER ADMINISTRATION 7 0 1 0 0; i 95.0460-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 116 10 13 10 3131 1 95-0460-02 OFFICE FURNITURE 6 0 6 0 0l SUB-TOTAL WATER PRODUCTION 22 0 9 0 13 95.0410-01 LIQUID CNROMATOORAPNYlINFRARED SPE 111 016 10 10 $O 9S-0460-02 DIVISION INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SY 2 0 2 0 0 9S-0410-03 OZONE MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION 4 0 4 0 0 . . f 95.0410.04 1 VEXICLE (ADDITIONAL) 4. ....0 4 G 0 SUI-TOTAL WATER LABORATORY 26 is 10 0 0 I I ~ 95-0463-01 FIELD EQUIPMENT $1 10 $1 10 10 95-0463.02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1 0 1 O O } SUB-TOTAL WATER lNOINEERINO 2 0 2 0 0 { r i 95-0461.01 OVEIBIU WATER LINER $150 10 1150 10 10 i 9S-0461-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 62 0 13 0 49 9S-0461.03 WATER TAPS, LOOPS SO 0 0 SO 0 , 95.0461.04 REPLACE FIRE HYDRANTS A WALV96 64 0 64 0 0 95.0461-05 REPLACE WATER LINE STREET PROGRAM 200 0 0 200 0 95.0461.06 REPLACE MISC. WATER LINES 53 0 53 0 0 9S-0461-07 MISC. SQUIPH"t 1S 0 IS 0 0 95.0461.01 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER LINE/ 250 250 0 0 9S-0461-09 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM U►ORADE WATER 94 94 0 0 93.0461-10 WATER DISTRIBDTION IYITEM WILL ISO 0 ISO 0 r 94.0461.06 REPLACE N1IC. WATER LINES 213 0 243 0 94.0461.09 DISTRIWTION STITIM UPGRADE WATER 100 100 0 0 93.0461.09 DIItRIBOTION IVITEN UPGRADE WATER 566 566 0 0 PU.. 199-TOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION 20737 11730 726 250 4 95.0462.01 MOBILE EQUIPMEIPP 116 10 111 10 95-0462.02 WATER MITERS 140 0 140 0 95-0462.03 MIICILLAMEOUI EQUIPMENT 1S 0 IS 0 ddd • 10-TOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION 173 0 173 0 TOTAL 1995 CIP 2,969 1,741 929 250 6 Page 26 i i' R. f" CAPITAL IMPRayEAlr-NT oon daddad I.. 06x26 PN (991 1995 CAPITAL IWIOVWSNT PLAN VASTIVATSR DgAeumn I1 s 1000) realicr 60ND CVUSNT Aso-IN NONSSR FR0.I9CT DiSCeIMION TOTAL FUND eSVSNUI CONITR MIS FISCAL YSAR 91 91.0451.01 RISCOAAN9006 OFFICS LQUIP/►ORNITU 13 10 13 10 10 91.0651.02 NSW COIQOTSR 97 10 67 10 40 i /0S-TOTAL VASTIVATSR AWINIITRATION l0 0 10 0 0 ; Ii f 91-0670.01 NOeILI 2 01MI NT 55 0 36 0 19 ' 9100670-02 LIFT STATION eRNOVATION s0 s0 0 0 0 91.0670.03 LIFT STATION SCAM (4 IA) 12 0 12 0 0 91.0670-04 LAND MIRCSWI 6 DSVILOPMSNT s0 s0 0 0 9100476005 INN09'ATIrt 6 LLTUXATIVI TICKPOIM 30 30 0 0 0 { 91.0470.06 VASTSVATSR TeSATmW PLANT g"ANI1 760 760 0 0 0 SU1-TOTAL VASTSVATU TRSATNSNT 957 690 46 0 t! 91.0411-01 LASOUTaY CA/SV " NAINTUMCI 17 10 17 10 10 f E 91.0411.02 DIVISION 2Nrom?ION NANAOiIIIN, IT 2 0 2 0 0 91-0461.03 ATONIC A110RPTION SIRCTROPNOTOkM 16 N 0 0 0 i 91.0411.04 LABOU"RY Flaw NONITORINO SQtm 3 0 3 0 0 ii 91.0441.05 PRSTtSATNWT r oum WIPIISNT (N) 11 0 13 0 0 91-0481 -06 NAEAM NONITORINO Wind= 21 0 21 0 0 SOB-TOTAL WA519WAI U LABORATORY lit 66 46 0 0 ' 91.0472.01 all $13 $0 113 10 10 91.0472-02 FIILD IQO1rml 3 0 3 0 0 !1.0472-03 OfrICS IQOIPI , 6 nulT0ii 1. 0 1 0 0 , 101-10TAL VASTSVATSR RAINSUINO 17 0 17 0 0 i 91.0471.01 OVIRSIii SWIR LINTS 1200 1200 10 10 10 J j 91.0471.02 Nostu SQOIPN w 112 0 7s 0 37 1 91.0471-03 M= Tut 36 0 0 36 0 91.0471.04 AWLA41 SIMSS LINT S27SST Peomm 100 0 104 0 o 91-0471.05 INFILTRATION INFLOM COeu"loo 250 250 0 0 0 91.0471.06 SSPLACS WISCILLANS00S SIWIA LINTS 36 6 34 0 0 91.0471.07 DIVSLOPNWT PLAN ISM LINTS 250 250 0 0 0 ~ 91.0471.06 NIICILLms"s 6Q01PNSNT 29 0 29 (1 91.0471.01 COU90:00 6YSI N UPGUDI IIVU LI 350 350 0 0 0 9100471.10 $&MITI Fuel INMVSNSNT (SIRVIC 16 0 16 0 0 91.0471.11 NOIIU DATA TSININALS 30 0 30 0 o 91.0471.12 VASTSMAM COLLECTION SYMN INFIL 150 0 ISO 0 0 SUS-T:%*AL VASTIVATIR COLLECTION 115s9 1,050 636 36 37 TOTAL 1991 CIP 21655 20006 $51 36 56 Page 27 ell- rJ\ ~,iR,,a . Ma4q , 1 i■■y■1 ryr9i4. N •ti CAPITA iuaanvNT PST r ob ~ 26 all } 1911 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FLAX WASTEWATER DSPARTKW i (0 s 1000) i PROJECT IOMD CORREMT AID-IN ..t PROJECT TOTAL MD UVWl CONSTRaC OTI<SR ' FISCAL ME 92 92.0451.01 MISCILLANl00S OFFICE WlpMOMMT/rn 14 M)o µ 10 10 ; Sul-TOTAL WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 4 0 4 0 0 91.0470-06 WASTEWATER TRLTMENT PLANT IYFAMII 6815 6,&1S 0 0 0 92.0470.01 MOSILS WIN=? 35 0 19 0 16 , 92-0470.02 LIFT STATION RIMOVATION SO SO 0 0 0 , 92-0470.03 Lin STATION ICADA 92-0470-04 LAND MCRASI & DEVELOPMENT 12 o 12 0 O f 92-0470-05 IMMOMATIVI k ALTIRMATIVI TICIVOLOG 30 50 so a 30 0 0 0 SOS-tOTAL WASTIVATU TIEAIXW 60992 60945 31 0 16 i ~ 1 92.0411.01 LAIORATORY CAIIMORK NAIMMMANCE 67 0 / '0 10 92.0461.03 GA1~ /Mas PLCS WWj 64 64 0 92-0441-04 LAMORAMY SINK FOIE ROOD o 0 0 92.0441.05 MI.L. PREVENTION/DIIPOSAL EQOIPMRM 2 0 2 0 0 } 92.0411.06 PRRTRIArAM& PROGRAM WIPMWT 10 0 to 0 0 j ..........N I aDE•rorAL warlwAra LuaATOaY g; 31 C 0 92.0472.01 611 15 $0 /5 60 to r 92.0472-02 FIELD wipwm 11 0 11 0 0 92.0472.03 OFFICE WIPMEMT 6 YWITMfEE r ; 1 0 1 M p I i SVB-TOTAL WASTRMATIN EMGINEIRING 17 0 17 0 0 92.0471.01 0VWI:E SEMER LINKS 4 12.0471.02 Motu wir4 N7 '157 1200 10 W 10 92.0471603 SiMiR tAPI 1S7 0 SO 0 107 92.0471.04 REPLACE 11M Link STREET PROGRAM 20160 0 2000 10 0 92.0471.09 t"11,110109 INFLOW CORRECTION 256 250 0 0 0 92-0471.06 REPLACE NISCILLAM US SMU LINE! 24 0 28 0 0 92-0471.07 MIICILIAMEOGS WIPWAT is 0 1S 0 0 gVSLOPWW 92.0471.09 COD Lt.ESYSTEM OPORADt SIYER LI Soo 300 0 0 0 1 92.0471.10 WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM INFIL 130 0 ISO 0 0 91.0471-06 REPLACE NISCELLANIOOS IRM LIMES 306 0 306 0 O 91-0471-09 COLLECTION S"MM DPGRADI SEWER LI 1440 1,440 0 0 0 i SOS-TOTAL wLSTEWATER COLLECTION 3,514 2,H0 749 it 107 i ' TOTAL 1992 CIP 10,622 9,649 132 is 123 Page 28 1 ~r Z r t .__._._.-SA~IIAI~IMP.H~V~~I~.EI~T PROJECT 04 ~ 24 rM 1141 - 1995 CAPITAL IXPROVDUONT PLAN WASTtWATIR DWATMiNT (S s 1000) PROJICT SOMA CORRRNS AID-IN t Nuwan PROJtCT DLSCRInION TOTAL FOND RSVW9 CONSTROC OTRU FISCAL YIDA 93 93-0451.01 MISCILLAII&WS OPTIC= tQOIPMRNT/FOR IS $O $5 40 40 1 SOS-TOTAL WASTtWATU ADMINISTRATION S 0 S 0 0 i 93.0470.91 MOSILI 1QOIPWaT 444 $O 423 $O $25 93-0470-02 Lin STATION IiMOVATION 93-0470.03 LIP? STATION SCADA (4 U) 12 50 12 0 0 93-0470-04 LAUD PURCWR, 4 OIVRLOP"1:XT SO 50 0 0 0 93-0470-05 INNOWATIVS 4 ALTLUATIV11 TICWOL00 30 30 0 0 0 93.0470.06 ADDITIONAL PUSONAL COWVTIR l0 0 10 SUI-TOTAL WASTIWATSR TRIATMRMT 200 130 43 0 25 i 93.0441.01 LASMATORT CASIWORU NAINTINANCS 43 40 $3 10 40 ;I 91.0441.02 RULACOMT LABORATORY tQUIPMANZ 22 19 3 0 0 93.0441.03 DIVISION INFORMATION MAN101 ma SY 2 0 2 0 0 93-0441-04 PR&TRSATmW PROGRAM 93-0411-05 ADMINISTRATION WILDING RINOVATION 44 .64 10 0 0 301-TOTAL WASTIVATU LAMATORY 105 93 22 0 0 { i 93.0472.01 FItL WIPM, 412 40 412 40 40 93.0472.02 OYFICI iQOIrAW 4 MUITOU 1 0 1 0 0 SUI-TOTAL WASTIVATIR tPOIN1131I100 13 0 13 0 0 f 93-0471.01 OVtRfiZ1 Stwu LINT! 4200 4200 40 $0 40 ~ 93.0471.02 NOBILA IQ l"UT 229 0 l01 0 121 93.0471.03 ItWB TAPS 93.0471.04 RVI ACS S8141 LIMA STRUT PROORAW ISO 0 154 10 0 93.0471.05 INFILTRATION IVnOW CORUCTION 230 250 0 0 0 93-0471-04 RIPLACI MIICLI.LAMIOQS 19VU LIMtt 36 0 36 0 0 93-0471-07 OrflWoPMIN? PLAN 80M LIMIT 230 250 0 0 0 93.0471.06 NISC&UAPtO01 RQOIPWW It 0 15 0 0 93.0471.09 COLLICTION STO M 0►0102 S9VU LI 420 420 0 0 0 93.0471.10 WASTEWATU COMMON 1YSTIN INPIL ISO 0 ISO 0 0 92.0471.06 JVLACI MISCILLAPS06 StWU LIMIT 247 0 247 0 0 92-0471.09 COLLICTION IYITSK OPOW9 111dU LI 1000 1,000 0 0 0 91.0471.09 COLLBCTION 1Y1Tt1I OPOR"I. SIM LI I" NO 0 0 0 0.00 SUB-TOTAL WAST11WAT131 COLLMION 30155 $0010 499 16 121 - i TOTAL 1993 elf 4,171 30223 714 1/ 153 Page 29 i A ~ f look WASTIMATIA OLPAmina" 0 s 1000) PROJICT NUM IR PROJICT DASCRIFTION SM CUR"" AID-19 f TOTAL MD Rams CONITROC onu FISCAL YIAA 94 I t 94.0491.01 MISC ZLLAtit003 OPIICR LQOIPIOiNT/FUR =6 $p '6 $0 'p „xsrJ ! SUA•TOTAL WASTIWATAA ADMINISTRATION 6 0 6 0 i i 94.0470.01 MOSSES IQUIPMANT $52 10 116 136 $0 f 9400470.02 LIFT STATION RANOVATION so so 0 0 0 94.0470.03 LIFT STATION SCADA 12 0 12 0 O i 94-0470.04 LAND PIRCNASL 4 DSVRLOnOWT 90 s0 0 0 0 94.0470-05 INNOVATIVI A ALTIRNATIVI TLCRNO1.00 30 30 0 0 0 94-0470-06 RAACTIVATL M WORTS DRIVI LIFT ST 106 106 0 0 0 94.0470.07 RNCTIVATI SMY 710 LITT STATION 10 /0 0 94.0470-01 WMTP 9XPANSIOW - OLTIJOATA IL0D09 D 440 440 0 p O 9160470-06 WASTAWATAR TRIATMINT FLAN? LLFANAI 10265 109269 0 0 0 i IUA•TOTAL WASTR'WATAR TARA?MINT 119013 111021 26 36 --p f 94.0441-01 II(DUCTIVILY MPL90 PLASMA IPACTRO 160 160 10 10 1o E 94-0411.02 LAAORAToRY WIpmW I 0 1 94.04S1.O3 DIVISION INVORMAIION MANAoLMINT Sy 2 0 2 0 0 94-0411.04 FRATRAA?NIN? PSOOIAM 14 0 14 1 i i { 0 . S01-TOTAL vA1tSWATAR t.AAORATORY 60 24 D p 94-0472.01 IIILo AQOlPNSN? 94.0472-02 OFPICI Ap►UmM 4 mxlTvU 13 /3 10 10 94.0472.03 Won& AQ inm 1 0 0 t 0 0 1 .....ts......0 1 . 10 595-TOTAL MAITAIIA?IS INOINtum 22 0 12 0 to 94.0471.01 oym IAI IAWIR LINAI 1200 1200 10 10 94.0471-02 was= Ap►ItHm 17 0 3 0 14 i 94 .0471.03 SSIM TAPS 14 94.0471.04 IOLA" IAWIR LINT InIM ►AOORAN 130 0 ISO t0 00 94.0471.05 INTILTSA?ION INFLOW CtMASC?ION 250 230 0 0 0 94.0471.06 RULACI NISCUJ ANA00S 19MIR LINAI 36 0 36 0 0 , 94.0471.07 MISCILLANI001 WIPNAIIT Is 0 94-0471.01 DIV=PNANI FLAN IOU LINK! 2SO 230 10 0 0 94 0471.10 M~TSWATU COLLICTIIT ~ IL Ll log ISO 110 130 0 0 93.047146 SULACS NISCILLANSOOL SWU LIM 335 0 335 0 0 ~ 93.0471.09 COLUCTION SYITSM OPORAON IIVU LI 1304 19300 0 0 0 92.0471.09 COLLACTION IYIIIN Down IBM L3 900 900 0 0 0 SUS-TOTAL WASTAWATAR COLLIC?ION 3 101 3.00 649 11 14 TOTAL 19% CIF 141991 14,161 739 54 24 Page 30 c rwkzo~ I u.w. I I l~ Caplra uAOOr►u~.,~.~•, mss,. l 1991 1993 CAPITAL INPROVIMRNT PLAN WASTIWATSR DSPARTWW .......t$ : 1000) . PROJSCT 1 NUMNSR PROJECT DESCRIPTIoN TOTAL NOND CU AW AID-IN MV RIVSNUS CONSTRUC OTRSR FISCAL YSAR 95 15.0451.01 NISCLLLAN90U6 OP►ICS SQUIPMSNT/FUR $7 t0 $7 40 $0 ntvk IUR-TOTAL WASTSWATSR ADMINISTRATION 7 p 7 0 0 95-0470.01 MOSILI SQUIPMINT 416 10 $13 10 it A 95.0470-02 LIFT STATION AMOVATION 50 $0 0 93-0470.03 LIFT STATION SCADA 93.0470-04 LAND PURCHASE 6 DRVSLOPNSNT !0 50 10 0 0 93-0470-05 A 0 p 95-0470.06 YASTSYA TSR TRSATMSNT PLANTS ~jo l 7230 30 0 0 720 p 94.0470-06 WWTP EYPANSION - ULTINATS SLUDOS D $630 50630 0 0 0 0 p SUN-TOTAL WASTSWATIR TRSATMSIIT 60506 6,440 27 p 1 95.0441.01 LIQUID CNR0I0ATOGRAPISY/INFRARSD SPI IS$ $SS $0 $0 $0 95.0461.02 NIClolaorS VIOSO SYSTSM 5 0 95.0461.03 OSONN MONITORING INSTRUMINTATtON It 0 1! 0 0 1 95-0461.04 ADDITIONAL VSUICL7S (WAILS SQUIPNS 12 0 12 0 0 0 SUS-TOTAL WASTRWATSR LASORATORY """--p 44 SS 2! 0 95.0472.01 FIELD /QUIPMENT 95.0472-02 OFFICS IoJh S1IT 6 PURNITURS $1 io $1 i0 40 0 1 p p , SUR-TOTAL MASTSWATIR SNOINSSRINO 2 0 2 0 p i 95.0471.01 OVSR4IE2 ISVZR LtMIS $200 0200 `0 $0 ' $0 9l-0471.02 N063U going" 95-0471-03 ISM TAPS 29 0 17 ~ i 95.0471.04 RIVLAOS Ills t LINT STRSIT PROGRAM 100 0 100 10 0 1 95.0471.05 MVILTRATION INFLOW COARICTION 250 250 0 95-0471.06 RSPLACS NISCSLLANIOUS MU LINSS 27 0 27 0 0 ~ 9S-0471.07 DRV=PNSNT PLAN SSWIR LINKS 230 250 p i 95.0471-04 MISCulut004 IQUIPMSNT IS 0 Is 0 j 9 94-0471-09 S-0471.09 WASTSWATIR COLLECTION 4YITEM INPIL ISO 0 ISO 0 p 94.0471.06 RNPLASCRIMISCVJ ANIODUSSAM LINKS_ 3620 30 62 0 330 0 0 93.0471.09 COLLECTION SYSTSM UPGRADS SAM LI 1300 1,300 0 p 0 SUN-TOTAL WASTEWATER COLLECTION 3,290 21620 634 19 17 GRAND TOTAL 1990 - 1995 CIP 42,344 31,194 3,631 145 374 r Page 31 I r~ ~ ~ 1114 ~~.,r.r 1N+ O ~0 m J 0~ V1 ~ W N Q 10 m v 0~ N a W N F+ I N O 00 r N S O O W O O N O O N V N O O 4 co $ {I 61 d O lNll O O O N 1+ FO+ N 0~ O 0k twA O N V I I f N y ~ ~ O D O Q O W S O O W O N O O V YI O O O W j ~O v W O O O V N O O 10i~ P O VOi fJ 1~1~ tilt e~ O O O ►N+ yQ1 tVJ + b NN + 8 a~ ~p ►W v Ni t~A O O O Vi O O N J O t~i~ ♦ O Cr O O tJ1 i P W ~ ppoo y~ N 1.14 Lo" COD 1 Page 32 'I i r r w r r A W N r 4 j O ~e • V O~ M A W N r 1. , . . . . . . . . . M b M O Q z w9wwm 91 ~ ►1 ~ N C N w ~ N H A M ~ i r M r r + 1 Nfy G r f yy y1 yy1f J~ 6q 46 O ` !II N H J ~'S I 1 yr~ N yN~ N N r r A W 1 , •p' 1 O O O v O O M A O a V 1I rN f O N W / 1 1 11 1 ' W I V 0, y r r N yr{/1~ w pn 1 ' r' r VI A O W O O A. y~ W A l 1 O O N p y N f W f a r A r {/N~ /y"1 yl JV yr1 ~ ~ I W O W N O O O W J O O r p IVjI j 1 1 1 V r r ~ N ry~ yyyl ~ Vr~ ; 0w ; r O A A O O OO O O p p; N P4 4F6 it I W p y i O O O N P • V1 W 1 i Page 33 q i w/ fro i tr A W N r O V A V a N A W N u ! . . " ~ ~ ~ ~ gggQQQ ~ ~ s ~ rr ~ L t,~ F ~ i~N71 N ~ ~ ~ ~ y g i r r w ~ ~ ►1 ~ E ~ yy~ !u1~ wi < 1 e N 1 + N O N u V i • O • ~ ♦ N O W N I A - O 1 u + N o r u 1N~ N yN r •X P y 1 1 N' VI N N r N W O + N w % • N I N 1 1 r I 1 1 N 1 • 1 ~ r 1 a n a v Yi W IS O O H. 1 W N 1 W r 1 1 A i N r 1 ~p Y1 ~1 v1 • . f « i u~ V V VA ci O O O O 0 O Ian O i I 1 So Pi I~ y1 1~1 Iy o y~ w i r I N M V N N V • N O N 8 W N 1 1 1 1 N r r N 01 r 1 ,a • • rah 61 .1 r 1 twA 1 i Page 34 i 1, r Nr eo /I woooooo~woo CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN COMMUNITY SERVICES x 1000) 1 1 PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR 011JU i y i 91-0030-01 Nev Personal Computer 4 0 4 0 0 91-0030-02 Replace Worn Carpet -.-..3 0 3 0 0 1 - f TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1951 CIP 7 0 7 0 0 f I f 92.0030-01 Upgrade to 800 Megahertz 4 0 4 0 0 92-0030-02 OIS Terminal 4 0 4 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEM - 1992 CIP 8 0 a 0 0 I i i 93-0030-01 Nile. Office Equipment 2 0 2 0 0 93-0030-02 Nev Personal computer 5 0 S 0 0 E TOTAL FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP 7 0 7 0 0 4 I j 94-0030-01 Misc. Office Equipant 3 0 3 0 0 - TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP 3 0 3 0 0 95-0030.01 Misc. Office Eq+jlpment 4 0 4 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP 4 0 4 0 0 i TOTALS FOR CI? PERIOD 1991 - 199S 29 0 29 0 0 k i Page 33 ri 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN € EQUIPMENT SERVICES i 20-Apr-90 r i 7 I PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION BOND CURRENT AID-IN TOTAL FUND REVENUE .CONSTR OTHER 91-0580-01 Upgrade Pull Tank system .•_-~~3 ~~~~..0 91-0580.02 New IBM P82-30 Computer 3 0 3 0 0 i 1 91-0560-03 Replace IBM Typewriter 5 0 0 1 91.0580-04 UP6rade Office Furniture 1 0 1 0 0 2 . 2 0 0 SUB-TOTAL EQUIPMENT SERVICES . 11 0 - 11 0 0 91-0581-01 Replace Wife Welder 2 0 2 0 0 SUB-TOTAL MACHINE SHOP 2 0 2 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1991 CIP i 13 0 13 0 0 92-0580-01 Mobile E ui 0 92-0560-02 Replace Tire CChengo Machineck 15 0 3 11 6 0 92-OS80-03 UP6rede to 600 Me6ah4rt: 10 0 6 0 0 1 92.OS60-04 Misce11e0e0us Toole 10 0 0 SUB-TOTAL EQUIPMENT SERVICES - 2 0 2 0 0 33 0 21 0 12 I ; 92-0561.01 UP6rade to 800 Me6eherts f ' 2 0 2 0 0 i SU6-TOTAL MACHINE SHOP 2 0 2 0 0 TOTALS FOR rEAR . 1992 CIP 35 0 23 0 12 i 93-0580-01 Replace Tire Balance Machine f 93.0580-02 rmiesion Control Analyser 10 0 10 0 0 F 93.0560-03 Replace Air Compressor 0 3 0 0 i 93.0560-04 Overfill Buckets oa Fuel Tank 6 0 6 0 0 93-0560.05 Miscellaneous Tools 4 0 4 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 SUB-TOTAL EQUIPMENT SERVICES 26 0 26 0 0 I 93-0581-01 Miscellaneous Tools i 2 0 2 0 0 I r SUB-TOTAL MACHINE SHOP J 1 0 2 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR . 1993 CIP 28 O 18 0 0 Page 36 Ole- p! f CAPITAL 181Aat]1lFUStWpnojfCT 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN { EQUIPMENT SERVIC9EAYICES (S x 1000) I 94-0580-01 Mobile Equipment--Service Truck 16 0 16 0 0 94-0580-02 Miscellaneous Toole 3 0 3 0 SUB-TOTAL EQUIPMENT SERVICES 19 0 19 0 0 94-0581-01 Replace Wire Helder 3 0 3 0 0 ' ......0 SUB-TOTAL MACHINE SHOP 3 O 0 i TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP 22 0 22 0 0 95-0580-01 Two Transmission Jacks b 0 6 0 0 I 95-0580-02 Miscellaneous Tools 3 i 0 3 0 0 ~ ? I SUB-TOTAL LPMLN? S EQU EAVICES 9 0 9 0 i I 0 95.0581.01 Mobile Equipment--fiat Bad 22 0 22 .0 0 SUB-TOTAL MACHINE SHOP 22 0 22 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP 31 0 31 0 0 TOTALS FOR CIP PERIOD 1991 - 1995 129 0 111 0 12 I i I I } 1 f ~ I I j Page 37 i M n> 2 Tl! t 1 E C PROVEM NT PROJECT. 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVE'? l!T PLAN SOLID WASTE ° (0 X 1000) 20-Apr-90 t I ' F D f PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER i 1 9t-0801-01 Mobile Equip•-Rear Load Truck (R) 83 0 0 0-..... 63 . 91-0801-02 Mobile Equip--Rear Load Truck (R) 83 0 0 0 83 91-0601.03 Mobile Equip--Replacement Car (A) 12 0 12 0 0 91.0801-04 Mobile Equip--1/2 Ton Pickup (R) 12 0 5 0 7 91-0801.05 Curbsids Recycling Pilot Program 95 0 33 0 62 91.0801.06 Miscellaneous Office Equipment 1 0 1 0 0 91-0801-07 Reward for Adopt a Street 19 0 19 0 0 91.0801-08 Habits Equipment--Chipper (N) 41 0 7 0 34 SUB-TOTAL RESIDENTIAL 346 0 77 0 269 91-0802-01 Mobile Equip--Front Load Truck (R) 117 0 0 0 117 91-0602-02 Equipment (Frontload Dumpaters) 41 0 41 0 0 91-0602-03 Upgrade Equipment (Roll Oft) 20 0 0 0 20 91-0802.04 Recycling Containers 18 0 16 0 0 91-0802.05 New Dumpster Screening 20 0 20 0 0 91-0802-06 New TV Cameras 6 Monitors 6 0 6 0 0 I SUB-TOTAL COMMERCIAL 222 0 85 0 137 I j 91.0603-01 Mobile Equip--623 Scraper Rental 4S 0 45 0 0 91.0803-02 Compactor Overhaul 15 0 1S 0 0 91-0603-03 Miscellaneous Tools 5 0 5 0 0 91.0803.04 Now T-Rubber lost 1 0 1 0 0 91.0603-05 Tire Cutter is 0 0 0 IS I f SUB-TOTAL DISPOSAL 81 0 66 0 15 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1991 CIP 649 0 228 0 421 f 92.0601.01 Mobile Equip--tsar Load Truck (R) 88 0 0 0 86 k 92.0801.02 Mobile Equip--Rear Load Truck (R) as 0 0 0 88 I'I 92.0801.03 Mobile Equip--12 yd Rear Load (R) 58 0 0 0 $8 92-0801.04 Upgrade to 800 Megahertz 20 0 20 0 0 SUB-TOTAL RESIDENTIAL 2S4 0 20 0 234 f j 1 Page 38 a _ -CAT t ~ y4.tw Ca+} I3i~na~ CAPITAL IMppOVEMENT PAO~ECT ~,r, 199_- 1 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ► SOLID WASTE Il (S X 1000) 92-0802-01 Mobile Equip 92-0801-02 •-Anil J!t Truck (R) 94 0 0 0 94 11 Equipment (Frontload Cum stern) 43 0 41 0 0 r 92-0602.03 Equipment (Roll Off) 32 0 0 f 91-0802.04 Dumpater tcreeaing 25 0 32 f } 92-0802-05 Upgrade to 800 Megahertm 0 25 0 0 22 22 . SUB-TOTAL C oNmCut. 116 0 40 0 126 fE 92-0803-01 Mobile Equ! paeac--Hater Truck (R) 9 0 9 0 0 92-0803.02 Mobile lugipwat--Compactor (N) l60 0 0 1 92-0803.03 Flexible Membrane Liner 45 0 180 92-0803-04 Leachate Collection System 45 0 4S 0 0 jl 92-0807-05 Upgrade to 800 Megahertz 45 0 0 T 0 . SUB-TOTAL DISPOSAL 286 0 106 0 l80 i TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CIP 156 0 216 0 540 f 93-080.1-01 Mobile Equip--Rear Load Truck (R) 92 0 0 0 93-0601-01 Mobile Equip--Clew Brush Truck (R) SS 0 92 93-080;-03 Mobile Equip-•1/2 Ton Pickup (A) is 0 0 0 SS 1 0 8 SUI•TOTAL RESIDENTIAL " " " 162 0 7 O 1SS j 93-0602-01 Mobile Equip--poll Off Truck (R) 46 93.0802-02 Equipment (Roll Oft) 30 0 0 0 96 I 93-0602.03 Equipment (Frontload Dumpaters) is 0 0 30 0 15 0 0 SUB-TOTAL COMMARCIAL 141 0 is 0 126 k - 93.0803-01 Mobile Equipment--Pickup (1) 16 0 ' 93-0803.01 Develop New Landfill 6000 0 6004 0 10 j SUB-TOTAL DISPOSAL 6016 0 6006 0 10 1 I TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP 6319 0 6028 0 291 f I f~ I1 I ' I Page 39 i 7777&APITALIM R0VEMENT PF10JECT _ r.~.,. 1991 - 1993 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 7 s SOLID WASTE i (8 Y 1000) 94-0801-01 Mobile Equip--Rear Load Truck (R) 97 0 0 0 97 94-0801-02 Mobile Equip--Flat Bed Truck (R) 52 0 0 0 .'-.-52- 'i li SUB-TOTAL RESIDENTIAL 149 0 0 149 3 94-0802-01 Equipment (Frontload Dumpsters) 34 0 34 0 0 ! € 94-0802-02 Equipment (Roll Off) 14 0 0 0 14 I SUB-TOTAL COMMERCIAL 48 0 34 0 14 94-0803-01 Building Maintenance 15 0 13 0 0 94-0803-02 Landscape for Landfill 15 0 15 0 SUBTOTAL DISPOSAL 30 0 30 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP 227 0 64 0 163 { 95-0801-01 Mobile Equip--Rear Load Truck (R) 101 0 0 0 101 1 N ' SUB-TOTAL RESIDENTIAL 101 0 0 0 101 95-0802-01 Nobile Equip--Front Load Truck (R) 130 0 O 0 130 95-0802-02 Equipment (Frontload Dumpatere) 30 0 50 0 0 ! SUB-TOTAL COMMERCIAL 180 0 50 0 130 95.0803.01 Mist office furniture b Equipment 2 0 2 0 0 i SUB-TOTAL DISPOSAL 2 0 2 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP 283 0 52 0 231 TOTALS FOR CIP PERIOD 1991 1995 8234 0 6568 0 1646 i i I 1 1 rI f 1 ( Page 40 f~ i i 4 J~ 1990-1995 GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ,1( ( BACKGROUND 23 July 90 For the first time since Denton has been developing a multi-year CIP and to an unprecedented degree, property values will decline from previous years. The impact of that value decline may result in substantial revenue decline which will impact operating and maintenance budgets and debt I service potential, which is funded by tax revenuo. The drop in appraised value coupled with only small sales tax revenue increases has led to a more austere CIP than the CIP adopted last year. i Following policy guidance established during the 1966 Bond Election I process, the CIP should not require tax increases, Previous CIP's have IJ assumed from 44 to 8% revenue growth without the tax increases. That assumption is no longer valid. CIP APPROACHES Accordingly, the General Government CiP follows these eppronchesr 1. Complete projects equal to the 1986 Bond Election before adding new f debt, 2. Limit selling new debt. 3. Delay construction of four buildings which not only terry with them new debt services, but substantial O&M costs as follows e a. NE Recreation Center b. South Side Recreation Center Al co New library d. Constructiin of a Law Enforcement/Court complex f 4. Use sold bonds and bond savings to fund (1) health and safety CIP C items related to streets and drainage and (2) the Parke Board's highest priority, athletic field development. 5. Since revenue has become problematic and long-range forecasting of revenue is also problematic, financial targets of future debt issues are not presented, end the Five-Year Schedule of CIP I projects for fiscal 1996 thru 2000 is withdrawn, 64 New bond elections followed by new debt issues required for funding ` the proposed five year plan would be for streets and drainage, only. Page 41 i i Y 1990-1995 General Government CIP Executive Summary Page 2 SUMMARIES Following is a new debt comparison of the previously adopted CIP and this year's CIP for General Government projects. YEAR RECOMMENDED ADOPTED IN 1989 I 1 1 1990-91 1 $ 132,952 1 510140,000 1 'I I I I 1991-92 I $1,422,737 1 $3,907,690 I 1 I I f ' 1992-93 I 52,497,785 I $4,368,121 I E I I i 1993-94 1 $2,047,000 1 $4,332,000 1 I 1994-95 1 521785,000 1 53,7509590 1 B. Total expenditures by year (excludes grants, match, and constructon by I others). 1990-91 $ 21321,952 1991-92 2.0000337 1992-93 21497,785 1993-94 2,047,000 1994-95 3,660,000 I !12,527,974 C. Total expenditures by category by year (excludes grants, match, and construction by others). Streets 1990-91 5 1590000 1991-92 1,1651337 1992-93 1,143,785 1993-94 10047,000 I f 1994-95 109100000 Total 550425,122 3 Drainage 1 00 1990-91 $ 53010 1991-92 835,000 j 1992-93 1,354,000 1993-94 100000000 L-~ 1994-95 10750, Total 5504690000 i Page 42 t l it 1990-1995 General Government CIP Executive Summary Page 3 Parka and Recreation 1990091 $800,000 1991-92 0 1992-93 0 1993-94 0 1994-95 0 Total $8000000 Public Buildings 1990-91 $132,952 j Public Safety 1 1990-91 $700,000 TOTAL 5120527,047 i i k i V i! i i 2533k Page 43 I e Fi C GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1990.91 i PROJECT FUNDING sO1MCE July 11, 1990 I SOLO I$owo$ of CO's I sm$ NOT .D OTHER TOTAL I I I ItfAml I 1 ! ! 1 Lillian Miller $idsoalk • j I I I f Engrrweriro J $6,0001 I I $6,0001 } I ! I i +J oriole Street Mr.mstructlon 1 and sidewalks aria«rins su,ooo j I I su,DOO ! 1 •1 Ft. Worth Drive Ingfrwering, ! right-of-way and lwwmc" I I I I 1 ! design 1 M9,0008I I 1 $89, ON j I ! ! J J I •I Mottinghra esterwion engineering 1 $50,000 I I 1 $50,700 j r ..............1 I - CATEGORY TOTAL ' $159,000 j I I I I I $ls9,0oo I I I ! ! 1 [DRAINAGE I I I J I I I I I f ►1 Stuart/sumrdate i $3sD,00D i I I J I i us0,ooo I e1 Lase Dal R Er+trwer I _ ay $ ino I I 660 ,000 I I 1 $eo, 000 1 I ! I I ! { 'J Moti)hlll/longridge Engineering 1 $30,000 1 I I +I I I 1 i $30,0e91 . f 1 It. Borth Drive/Je.es Street I "0,000 I I I l $90,000 ..............I I 1 I CATEGORY TOTAL i $530,000 i I I .........I 1 i $530,D00 E ]PARKS I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 •I North Lakes Athletic 1 Field Developmer. ! :$00,000 1 "00,000EJ $1,700,009 ! J I I I city gall am( I 1 s152,9atEl 0172.9S2 J 1 GTB$ORY TOTAL I sm.wo I $152,962 1 ssoo.ODo I $1,432,952 + 19U Bard Election Approved. istate grant tea's 11627,000 R.O.Y. for stretch 6615th of IX45. $53 ,00 f 1 m$trweri ",00 t or 11•35 to Collins n/. endseea design pass k i i I ~ ~S 4 F I GENERAL DOVERMFIENT r CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1990.91 PRaIECT FUNDING SOURCE MY 11, 1990 } I SOLD ISOND$ OR CO'S I I I M I SONDE I NOT SOLD I OTHER I TOTAL I 1PUSLIC SAFETY I I I I I I I I I I I Construct Fire Station rah 1 Ss00,000 I I I $500,000 1 1 I i • I Low Enf orc~tlCowt I E I ( i 1 Complex Deettn6 I 52001000 1 I 1 5200,000 I 1 ..............i I 1..............1 CATEGORY TOTAL 1 n9D,DD0 ! I 1 sno.ow I ~ I 1 ..............1..............1..............1..............1 TOTAL $2,119,000 $132,952 $500,000 $2,121,952 l TOTAL NEW CIP Dill ISSUANCE 5112,952 1966 Send Election Approved. 6A Speee Study for all city offices. My begin in 09.90. i I . !1 r Pees /5 t I M II1 mew" Fr 14 q ~ ~,ti:...+• i GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1991.92 PMECT FUNDING SOURCE July 11, 1990 SOLO Imil ON Cott I I I I 1 BONDS { NOT SOLD I OTNER I TOTAL I I I I I I ISTREETS I I I I I - ! I I I I I ' I E.tw4 Nottlrghm, .Ipwt I I I j I { and sidewalk { 1 sen,4Do I { "n,4oO I Teasley Ludscspln5 I f $107,337 1 $207,64131 $314,97S, 1 l I I I ~ ~ { Orlol. Street Recorrtruttfon I I I I I Ii{ 1 and sidewalks I I $1n,000 I I $125.000 { f I I Loop 2$$r us 3E0 to Colorado, k I ! I I Widen to 4 IV". R1Sht•of•Nsy! 512,600 1 { $9,141,596 1 $9,154,196 1 ' E . 1 { I 1 I I I s 1 Ft. Worth Dr. (U.S. 377); 1.35 I I I 1 I 1 to Collins Ohm 1 1 1 $450,000 1 1 "50,000 I ~ { I L...........L...........L...........L...........! 1 I CATEGORY rout 1 512,600 1 $1,152,737 1 $9,349,277 1 $10,514,574 f I I I I I E i I I k 1DRAINAGE I I I I I ~ ~ I I I I I ! 1 Loss Dal Noy 1 5365,000 I I I "low I I , I I ~ a. 1 NoLLy%fIVLorgrldw I I s2n,o00 I k ~70.~ I I CATEGORY TOTAL { $S65,DOO 1 5270,000 1 1 Sd35,000 { "1 I I I I I I JI 1 ! I ..............L............1..............1.............. TOTAL $577,600 $1,122,737 59,349,237 511,349,571 J TOTAL NEW CIP O5$t l"Umn $1,422,737 i r i ~bxrT J} I All projects art 10$6 Ton.' Electron approved, f 11 j i Fe" 46 I 1, ! yyI GERRAL GOVERMNEMT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN z 1992.97 ! I PROJECT FUNDING SOURCE July 11, 1990 i I SOLD ISMS (a Co 's l I I I . ' SONGS I NOT SOLD I OTHER I TOTAL I ; 7 I TB I I I I 1 Lillian Miller Srdwelk I I S s'm I I us. m I wit. Sit«ayl I I I ! I ~ ] $1dmLke I I $100,0001 I $100,0001 I I I I I I It. Worth Or. (U.S. 777)1 1.75 ! I I I I to Cows. -Phase 11 I I $500,000 I I ss00,o00 j Int.raaetron Cmerol lIgmtR I I I I i ? I I I $22$,000 I I sm,ooo I I I I I Turn Lam for Arterrale I I $90,000 I I $90,000 I , t I ! I I 'I landeape Loop Zee • I I i I ! IN75 to Matirrny I I $1SO,wo I $150,000 I I=.ODD I I i 1 Padeetrlw 51$nata I I SWIM I I I 1 ..............1 1..............1 I CATIO0011 TOTAL I I 11,143,7e5 I I $1,297,716 I „ ! I I I I I I f IoRAINAaE e I i I j Paean Croak kWtarn I I I I I I 1 i I I ""ter Plan I I ri1,000 I I $$1,000 I I I t ! ` I Cooper Creak Chwwl, Pheee I I I $750,000 I I $750,000 I Peen Creek, Ira&" to I I I I I Rud&Ll I I $290.0001 I $2$0,0001 I I I I I I tirefIow I I 575,0001 I $75,0001 ! 1 r • 1916 load Elattlon Approved. 7Leplly, eteetion not rewired by 19e6 Iord toveranta, IIloetion requlred. Pqe 4? 1 I i i II! 1J I' r i GENERAL GOWAIMENT V CAPITAL MOVEMENT PLAN ! 1992.9] i "WICT FUNDING SOUCE July 11, 1990 i .........................................~......low$ OR i r two I NOT SOLD I OTHER { TOTAL I i I I I I I I `i JORAINAGIL tcantlnwdll I I I l I { I I I I I AY&-%A a I I 1100,000 I I 1100,D00 { I I I 1 I W than, WSW, AloaNrdar ! I I I I i Arts I { 1123,000 I I 1123,000 I ft I I I ..............I I..............I I CATEOOAI TOTAL I I St,154,000 I so I 61,754,000 { I I I I I I i I I I I I I I ..............L .............I.............. TOTAL 12,497,7E5 SO 12,647,73! TOTAL MEN CIO DEBT ISSUANCE 12,197,735 I IElKttan r*Wlyd. i~ i j FNMA A$ y , ii r I 1 .r GENERAL GMRNMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN T r k { PROJECT FUNDING $OLNICE July 11, 1990 1 SOLD (BONNE OR COfE I. i I I WND$ I NOT SOLD I ..OTHER TOTAL I I I I I 1$11$$111 I I I I I ~ i Arterial turn Lana I 1 $100,000 I 1 $100,000 1 1 $1rwe CarntructlonY I I I I I Reconstruction I I $500,1100 1 1 1500,000 1 i j $1dawllo/llkew o I I $100,000 j j $100,000 j COW !treat Pw1M I I $112,000 I I 1112,000 1 I I I I 1 $1pnle I I 1235,000 I I $235,000 1 ! I CATEGORY TOTAL I I $1,011,000 I 1 11,947,000 1 1 E I I ! I I k 1DRAINAOEI I I I I ! 1 CAW Creak Dralnsge • I ( I I I ! ►no" 11 I I $590,000 f I 1500,000 I I I i I I ! 1 Paean Creek Drainage n:er ! I I I ! I RoWteon 1 k 00o,o0a 1 I 000.000 1 ! k l ..............I 1..............1 1 CATEOOIY TOTAL 1 I 11,000,000 I I 11,900,000 ! f ! I I I k 1 1............1............1............1............1 TOTAL 10 $2,047,000 10 $2,047,000 TOTAL CIP DEII 1111'AMCE $2,011,000 1Lgally, election not required by 106 land Cove unto. !Election required. i1 1 ►aN 49 i I 01 u n I ~'Ll4s• GENERAL OGWONIMEN1 CAPITAL INPAOYEMENT PLAN 1994.95 i PMECT FUNDING SOURCS Jul 11 1990 I SOLD Isow s OA coot I I II ! I I I BONDS i NOT SOLD 1 OTNEA I TOTAL 1 ' I I I I I I 1sT~lEE» ! ! I I I I I I 1 •I University Drlvo, IN-35 to I I i 1 I 377, Wldsn to 6 tress. I E.O.Y., 911MIS, L lydiuPlro I M75,000 1 "00.0001 541,203,37611 545,378,376 I n ! ! I I 1 I '1 Arterial Turn levee 1 1 $100,000 I I $100,000 I I I I I I 1 L&x%c Po kKlmsy a loop tee ! I $150,0001 $150,000 1 5300,000 I I I E ! I i ii street eorrtruetlon/ I I i I seoanstructlon I I Sao, ON I $40,0001 ! Yeetmey Psvlry ! I I I I I I 5235,000 ! I u3s,000 I i ..............i..............I.............. CATS001tT TOTAL i 'E 1 1 I 5875 000 li.035 000 S6A 353,376 S46 263,376 I I I I I IDMINABE I I I I 3 I I I I I I j Ioan Crsekr Kerley to Woodrow, I I I ! I ! i Mee! I i i $1,000,000 i f 51,000,000 I I Poan Crook Blom University I ! 5250,000 I I $250,000 I %r I I I Coops crook, phi" I11 j j "00,000 j 5500,000 ~ t I ..............I I..............I 1 CATEDOIIT TOTAL I ! 51,7so,o00 I 1 s1,m,om I I 1 ..............1.............. I..............I..............I TOTAL p77,000 $2,783,0 0 !41,353,376 $48,013,376 TOTAL CIP Dpi ISSAM $2,785 000 • 1946 " Alvevvel. 11DNP1 Isteetlon not rWrrl. i PW 50 II I ~ MINUTES Planning and Zoning Commission July 18, 1990 UNAF A special called meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas, was held at 5:00 p.m. in the City Coiinctl Chambers of the Municipal Building. Present: Euline Brock, Jim Engelbrecht, Ivan Glasscock, Etha Kiker, and Fran Morgan Absent; Judd Holt and William Kamman Present from Staff: Frank Robbbins, Executive Director for Planning and Development; Jerry Clark, City Engineer; Steve { Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation; and Olivia 11 Carson, Clerk-Typist Chairperson Brock called the meeting to order. k Hold a public hearing and consider the 1990-199S Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Chair opened the public hearing. There was no one present to speak to the issue. Chair closed the public hearing. Mr. Glasscock stated that the Commission has gone through the plan f pretty thoroughly. He has nothing special to add to the plan. Ms. Kiker stated that since the Commission has spent time going over the issues, she moves to recommend approval of the CIP as written. Seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht and unanimously carried ► (4-0). { Ms. Morgan arrived at the meeting. f Meeting adjourned at 5:15 p.m. i 2338x { i 1 J: MINUTES Planning and Zoning Commission July it, 1990 Y The re r lar meeting of the Planning andyy Zoning Commission of the ityCa Dentofi,T:xasofwtheheld,onpallBullalny90 at 5:00 p.m. In the Presents JllEnga nd reFran cht, Morgan Glasscock, William Kamman, Etha Kilter, V Absent £uline Brock and Judd Halt 1 Present from Staffs Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Bob Planningand Develo`mant; Owen Yost, Urban Planner; , Executive Director for Utllltl Nelson es; Glenn Gary, Nelson, al Engineering; David Ilan, Director of Electric aaA , Director of Hater/Wastewater Utilltlesl Steve Brinkman Park Services; Cecile Carson, Administrative Analyst; I Joe Morris Assistant City Attorneys Jerry Clark, City i Engineers Floyd Harrell, Clty Manager; iioward Martin, Water Lab; Lee Allison, Water/;tastewster; and Olivia ; Carson, Clerk•typtst Mr. Kansan was appointed temporary chair by acclamation and called the meeting to order. Ils. Xiker arrived at the meeting. 1. Hold a public hearing and consider the application by Mayhill Joint Venture, represented by Vernon Coe and Ben J clay or for itthe avelFtractlon i44 II and n sall - torage for of sand, caliehe, stone (SUP) STAFF REPORT: Mr. Yost reported that the site Is approximately 19.615 acres located south of Treatment Plant Road, north of Fo:'er Road and east of Mayhill Road. Is adjacent to the sews pa treatment plant and there are single-family homes in the area. The site is toned for light industrial use and a specific use permit is required i to operate the existing business. Discussions with the representatives of Mayhill Joint Venture culminated in the application for a specific use permit. A public hearing was set for October 2S, 1999. At the apylicant's request, this I hearing was cancelled, and notifl a lion appeared in the newspaper, with a statement that the public hearing would be rescheduled. fThe orespitaffnIahbringingcthistmatterhtouthe hearing; theor resolutlon. Commission f the PETITIONER: Courtney Cos, 7159 La Salina, Dallas, stated i that he is the son of Vernon Coe and when they purchased the land, they received a letter from the City informing them that no permit is necessary to level land awi~imadeor future development. Nine months ate, application a specific use permit. Through miscommunication, information was not submitted to staff. Mr. Coe asked that thatpchiicwillrhavebtime'toaget thatlinformation' to4theso staff, They did n a t know about the scheduling of the public hearing until two days ago. IN FAV011 none present. OPPOSED: none present. RECOMMENDATION: Mr. Yost stated that because staff has not received more detailed information, they are not taking a position on the matter at this point. ~ Mr. Kamm an said that they are currently operstinthe I business illegally. Ile asked If the operation will continue if the hearing it postponed until the requested date. II F 2-7 ~ff! ! j i p Paz Minutes r July it, 1990 Page 2 Mr. Robbins stated that the applicant has indicated that they have stopped operation. Mr. Engelbrecht said that denying the case at the present ■eetin! would have not Smpaet the petitioner since th(6 operation has ceased. Mr. Yost said that it would not $free& the way the property looks but would entail another fee for a new submittal. Mr. Engelbrecht asked if there has been any communication with the petitioner since the original hearing was postporsd. Mr. Robbins said that there were some informal discussions In the late spring. Mr. Coe explained that the reason they stopped operation is A that their contractor disappeared. They want to get a new , contractor and finish the job. Their intent is to level the site to it will be developable. They do not intend to do more work on the site until this matter is resolved. They are moving material and doing backfill. There are two holes on the site to eliminate run-off. They intend to develop ■ini•warehousss but have no plans to build in the immediate future. It the case Is postponed. they will not.de,ony. furth9[.alning at the site tmtll em. SUP 11 mppr."!J-- DECISIONi Mr. Glasscock moved to continue the public hearing on August 22 1990, Seconded by Fran Morgan and unanimously carried t5l It. Consider the final plat of Western Hills Parki Lot 1, block A Mr. Yost reported that the 6.187 acre tract is located immediately west of Interstate SS, and partially abutting 4 the city limits line. Frontage is aloe the southbound Interstate SS access road. On May 25, 1990, the Public Utilities Board (PUB) recommended approval of economic development funds contingent on Camping World locating at the site. costs ~n excess of the approved $02,000 will be the responsibility of the developer. The property is coned I light industrial and development of a Camping Mar d store to i serve the recreational vehicle oftermerket is anticipated. i It was moved by Mr. G1u }}cock, seconded b!!~~ Ms. Biker, and unanimously carried (S•0) to approve the Einal plat of Western Hills Business Parki Lot 10 Block A. III. Work Session to discuss the 1990.1995 Capital Improvement Plan. Mr. Nelson explained that the PUB to charged with putting i together the utility CIP that works with the general i uvernment Cit. He set forth the major elements of i determining the needs for the utility CIP and presented graphs to the Commission. He reviewed specific recommendations major projects, costs totals Information about bonds, one probable rate changes as will. There is a possible need for a new generator at the power plant, They are looking at the cost. They could put a a Its turbine to heat water and make steam, The ste a crewtts power and they could have michlles running oil the time. It would be more efficient. there are plant to take down the utility poles slon Anotternelevated utter storage°tankoiswneeded~ widening. i 1 n Ph2 Alnutps July 11, 109u Page S More landfill will be needed in 1993, If the current rte..,"• landfill is limited to residential Lisa only, it will extend its life to about 10 years, fnere is stilt dept and operating cost for the landfill. Options for commerci u solid waste will have to be examined. A task force will have to look at drainage utilities. there are now EPA t reauaatlons requlriug tasting of storm water, and possibly j detention and treatment. As. Llker awed about the underground conversion along University. k Mr. nelson replied teat tae concept is that when the nigaway Liepartment widens the street, the City will nave tee power poles either benlnd businesses or will install the lines undergrouna. at will be In the 1902 budget depending on the 11gh4ay uepart,oeat. Ms. Morgan asked moout the life span of large City venicles. At. Belson answered that the policy is seven years or 70,000 alias with the exception of the very big truces. Tney can get more years on them. Mobile equipment is included in i their price. the bucket part of some trucks may last IS years walle the truck Itself may not last tnat long and have to be replaced. Un question, no said that major projects cannot be rescneduled easily. Others are eas or to slide back a year if anticipated growtn levels are not reacded. At, Robbins stated that the major issues of the C1P were j discussed at the last meeting. Toe Commission wanted more information about development of recreation facilities. Staff is recoemendl,q segregatiou of bonds for library and recreatio center development. ins reasley la ndscapia n project has been moved back anotner year. One change Is the construction of dottln ham. Staft felt that the projects approved In the bond @fiction should be built before 1 beginning on others. At engelbrecut askea if critical maintenance for streets is being covered. Ar. Clark replied that taere is a standard operating budget for patching and one for construction, they will be mole to keep up and there are no major problems. Tne Cli assumes a poor revenue increase so if more revenue Is received, more projects can be added. Tney would Liao to be able to do major repaving with new equl~dont in the future. 111, Director's deport Mr, itobblas reported that staff Is putting together a r cks e .for the sign fee ordinance, It has to do with its r off promise signs that tat City will be certified to r issue. the Government Affairs Committee has been looking it the sf in ordinance. they may be visiting wltn the j beautification Commission and Planning and toning very soon. Tne doards and Commission's banquet Is on July 26, 1990, de has talked with people about the plat process rewrite, they ray be meeting In the evenings. Meeting adjourned at WS p.m. 2521x f ~ i -7 VLDM-" MINUTES A4, Planning and sonlnq commission June 77, 1990 Frr,t~.r The regular muting of the Planning and zoning Commission of the city of Denton, T e u, was held on June 27, 1990 at 51 DD P.M. in the Council Chambers at the Municipal Willing. Pr a entr Jim tngelbcecht, Ivan Glasscock, Judd Molt, William Karmen, ■nd Iran Morgan Absinti tuline Brock and Itha Kiker i Present from Staff, crank Robbins, ssscutive Director tot Planning and zonings Owen Soot, urban Planners Jerry Clack, City Ingineerc Joe Morrie, Assistant City Attornsyt and Olivia Careen, Clerk-typist Vice-chairman halt called the meeting to order. 1. Consider the minutes of the regular meeting of June 11, 1990. It was moved by Mr. gnomon, seconded by Mr. Glasscock, and unanimously carried 14-01 to approve the minutss of the regular meeting of June 11, 1990. I fI. Kesolutlon of Commendation tot Pllsabeth evens. j Item was postponed. III. Consider the varLance of Article %It, 1,01, section 9.1 and ' Article 1.15, Sections A and 1.0 of the 1911 subdivision j ' Regulations tot Green Valley Ranch estate Item was withdrawn. 1 j IV. Mork Session A. Discuss the 1990-1095 Capital Improvement Plan ICIP1, I! t At. Aabbins stated that the CIP is substantially more austere than last year's as a consequence of lower j revenue from property tax. Property values all down in Denton County end the proposed CiP is what staff thinks the city can afford to do. h At. Ingalbrocht arrived at the meeting. I! At. Robbins said that staff is trying to tallow the f direction from 1916 to have CiPs that do not raise taKee. The CIP Is therefore based on increased 111 revenue, A ter ince a ae was net part of the 1000 bond I issue or the voter guide. me. Robbins explained how the CIP funded and how bonds a sold and used, Banda have been sold to fund a new rocteation center, but because the City cannot afford to operate the building, staff is suggestinq that the bond money be used fog Street/, When bonds are sold for atrelta, that money 1 can be used to replace the bond money for the teessation center. At. Morris csutloned that he was unsure bond Roney could be used for something other than what the bond was approved for, to said it seams peculiar that the money could be used tot seething else. It the pet, lands could not be transteered from one project to aAothet, Money could only be used tog slackly what it was approved tot, Mr, RObbins stated that John MCGgene Of the Finance 1 Department and the City's bond counselor have been consulted, it is legal to transfer funds, the bonds that woes sold can be wood for any Project that Was approved in 1010, 1 . i i 1 I' PAZ Minute I June 11, 1990 Page 1 Mr. Molt said that when the City gets people intetested involved d0 h that,1e it s bothers trying biso do and then to in and decidN n f Mr. ingelbreebt uid that the project is only being delayed. it was not approved for a specific year. Mt. Molt stated that it is being suggested that bond money collected fog the tectcation ceases be spins on fff attests. I Mr. Robbins said that the City will then sell bonds for } attests and use it on the facto Lion center. Lest ytar ther was A five Year Cly plan :no livetyear schedulo, This Year Staff is not proposing the additional flue Yost schedule because they do not j know what rho financial tatgets will be. staff big simply listed projects that have already been •PPeor• . No. Morgan asked if the city will have to Make a f stateasnt to citizens. ; i Mr. Robbins sold that orSglnallY the city thought it j would have the sloe financial targets a last Year. { Then it received financial data that indicated tavenua say not be as much AS had been expected. The City is not legally required to Make s public pronouncement I about this. The City manager has been visiting with the , city council concttning this issue. When the City's level of tOgtthot, effort was I"crassalntaln the budget aIlating was Mt. Clark stated that the reason attests and drainage wtr• put on she p1+n ahead of the rteremtion eentee is because the Ptolscts are basically on schedule. The thinking was not to Panelist those areas becemet of problems with other pgoitetm. Mg. Robbins presented saps showing white the Salo[ CIP projects would be taking place. Mt. Ingelbreeht Asked if the bonds that have not been sold need to be apptoVed. 1 Mt. Robbins said that Some Of them do not N quits voter approval. Ms. Morgan clarified that bonds watt sold for what was 11 approved by voteto but not epteificallY for the ; recreation Center. it Could be built with a tax Increms@ Mr. Robbins said that the other option Is to decrease recreationecantor.etotem because of the9Other QxPtnS4: involved 111 with it. Mr. Halt said that ht does not want the City to have to cringe during an Audit. There are not enough basketball and Palk facilities. Itrests way need to be out to fund tht recreation center. bttterstybodY (11818COCk a but that they attests its getting Whak complaint a Ms. Morgan said that work in taking Place on streets all .I.!. OVSC town. It is very Visible but Be its athletic fields$ the has beard a lot of complaints about the look of facilities. 1 . . I~ Pat Minutes June 27, 1990 Page 1 Mr. penman raid that sports involve organised groups. There are not organized groups lobbying for each street to be repaired but it is somsthtnq that people want done. the City needs to continue street and dtainaq• improvements. Otganlsed Sports Should not be more dominant than other projects. Me. tngelbrecht asked what the cost of operation t maintenance of an athletic field is versus S. recreation I center. nr. Robbins said that it is a lot lees. , ; Mr. Cngelbtacht said that he would Ilk* to know the cost S, of operation and mSiLtenante for the two field at Dania Pack. He also asked for Information about the Oriole f street prwyact. Mr. Clock replied that it is uscclated with the Loma Bel lay drainage project. That area if a meas. The slope of the outfall is one foot in 7600 teat. The drainage will have to cross two state Coeds and a bridge must be built. The possibility of going down '.Mockingbirds and dumping the water in pecan Crook is being investigated. 1 B. Discuss the platting Pfaceal re-weite. Mr. Robbins stated that another committee is needed. state could put together developers of interest groups and developers, but does not want to have a bias. They 1 would like one of the Commissioners to chair the 3 committee. No conclusions have been reached on absolute language which a committee needs to loft through. staff recommends that the Commission appoint the committee, 1 Mr. tngalbtecht asked what *that committees are working 1 with the development community. There may be too math going on at once. ' Mt. Robbins said the system could get overloaded. Theta is the toning Task faces, the sign Committee, the landscape interest has no coal committee yet, and a transportation planning committee will be appointed. some Islas$ have been disci es ed with the teeutitiestion Committee. The 101 front yard landscaping fsgairemant is harmful to people with big setbacks, it may be j requiring too many trees. Landoesping is a 10% pflerity tight now but there may be developers tossing a group ; d and pushing the issue. Mr. Motrlt @Sid that that* were developers on the I landscape committee, It seems like the City kespe I I looking at ordinances over and over. Me. 6n9elbrscht said that the !tone yard requirement may f encocttge a minimal setback. Is a larger of Mettles setback desirable} Parking in the back might be goad. It to an interesting question but all the Committees may i I be putting too much pressure on the City. 1 Mt. Robbins gave a lilt of possible developers and engineers that could aecve on the plot process committee. Of laid that he has not checked with any of them except Hill Coleman to Its if they Ate interested. C. Dlscusl the toning Task force membership. Tha Coemislidn provided Mr. aobbint with suggestions tot i membership of the toning Task forces i -14- _ owl Pie minutes Juna 1?, 199U Pnga c fny„ « r t V. Director@$ Report. i ~ Nt. Robbins said that he is waiting !ot lnpu! fide the he OcPernmant Affairs Committee on k at gn ordinance, when they make a recommendation he will take it to the j Beautification Commission and than to the Planning and gating Cemnia:(on. Staff has done an analysis of how such it costa to 1 permit signs. That will also be brought to the J Commission. Transportation planning to dependent on appointment of a task fotce. A consultant If working with a modal and number crunching. They are doing forecasting. Robert M. Baas owns 900 acres at rM SSf and awy. 140, go wants to gat it fn an enterprise cone. That would require plan amendment. The Area is low intensity but they get so acres of moderate intensity. A detail have to be defined since this is outside* oluthe studyiarea o brought to f the Denton Development Plan. This Subject will be f the Commission study gttj If 6110 ready toCOMA back toftheaCommission swith thesgleenbelt, ~ Mr. Role said that he if interased !n the greenbelt but it is hard to think about when they have just been discussing t not being able to do things for years, i Me. Robbins replied that the greenbelt plan is a consolidation of existing policy a and a strategic plan to act on them. One thing that need: to be done is to put the j grwenbelt on the concept map, 4a a people racially wanted I to dedicate lloodplala land and there is no fdopted policy ! in plate as to whether the City should accept it of not. The greenbelt could tie together with edest wa D clan and bike not They YS. its usually in greenbelts. The City may n not be able to spend money on the greenbelt the public would be awits that you were trying to do something. They say want i to donate of do something to all@vlate the Costs. the on-prasiso consumption issue Nor downtown to still being t discussed. The aoning ordinance will probably be amended In E August, A church has moved into the old theater on the If square. Some snopownags are upset because they will not be able to gat bar and ulna permits within three buadred feet 0 - of a church. The caneeen is focusing around the Square, Staff has visited with the ehueohas in the Central Susin as District. They indicated that saa ptinq the Square would be okay but not the whole Central SUMIS Dtattiet, i Mt. Solt asked about the Campus Tnotter, Mee Robbins said that staff will look at it, i Notting Adjourned, If ' I 3101[ I f i f t 1. i M. ' EXCERPT err... PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES April 24, 1990 14. MAKE~L RECCMMENDATION ON UTILITY DEPARTMENT FIVE YEAR 1991-1995 LAMAL 1 THE CITY COUNCIL j Nelson reviewed costs, revenues, rates, future requirements, and I other items of the proposed CIP. Motion Chew made a recommendation to the City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission to incorporate this CIP in with the City's annual j CIP. Second by Frady. Vote I All ayes, no nays, motion carried. j t l ii 6819U:1U i I it r7 7] F1 C EXCERPT r PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES April 10, 1990 6, WORK SESSION ON UTILITY DEPARTMENT PROPOSED 1991-1995 CIP. Nelson reviewed the Utility Department CIF's. Electric will have a small increase in 1995 due to $16 million repowering of the Power Plant. Water will have a 15% increase in 1991-92 due to the Lake Ray Roberts Reservoir. In 199u, bonds will need to be sold for the Lake Ray Roberts Water Treatment Plant. In 1992, $8,5 million bonds will need to be sold for the Water Treatment Plant. The Upper Trinity Regional Water District is to pay 49% of the costs. The rate increase reflects their participation, Laney asked Nelson his feeling about the UTkWO. Nelson preferred to hold the rate increase to 12%, and to do this, some projects may need to be cut. The possible cuts would be miscellaneous water lines 1$48 million), water distribution system infill ($150 million), and development plan water lines 3250 million). Thompson felt it not wise to cut the enterprise lines, Nelson said the oversizing of water lines could possibly be cut, but only if development did not occur in 1991. Nelson explained there was another area in which water could cut back; and that is if the $333,000 repayment to the Electric uepartment could be delayed for 1991-92. Thompson asked if this would adversely affect Electric Utilities. Tullos said no. It was the consensus of the board to hold off two { years on repayment to the Electric Department instead of cutting projects from the CIP. Thompson wanted it understood that the debt was only delayed, not rescinded. Wastewater Utilities would experience a lower rate increase than originally projected with the extension of construction of "A Wastewater Treatment Plant from two to four years. In 1991, a 9% increase would be necessary; in 1992-93, a 12% increase in both years. Solid Waste Bill Angelo discussed the debt retirement of the Solid Waste Division and apprised the Board that a change in structure of the landfill to a residential facility would not only save our landfill by lu years, but would also eliminate the need for a $6 million landfill investment. Chew asked about increased fleet expense, Angelo said that transfer routes would cost more money and direct routes would requiro additional truck purchases to handle trunardund time. Nelson Informed the Board that Solid Waste's major CIP expense was in Mobile Equipment for the purchase of a truck/trailer rig ($95,000) for curbside disposal, An alternate proposal would be the expansion of the drop box program for paper and glass recycling, cerV Minutes Page Thompson asked if we could use the railroads instead of our vehicles. Angelo said the railroads do not go relatively close enough to the landfill centers. Equipment Services Strictly operational expenses. Drainage Services Street sweeper needs to be replaced. In 1994, General Government will assist with monies needed, out after the initial year, Utilities should have a Drainage Utility established, Nelson explained we would get a consultant to come to the PUB/PSZ/CC i regarding ,he Drainage Utility. The major problem facing the Drainspe Utility is that the Environmental Protection Agency will be { requiring the monitoring of the runoff. Mr. Laney asked about the upgrading of the fuel tank. TNC requires renovation of underground storage fuel tanks when they are so old, i 3 e 68190:8-9 r j C ~ I r 1 fift.N r• MINUIE5 Planning and Zoning Commission March 28, 1v90 The re ular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas, was held on March 28, 1990, at 5:00 p.m, In the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, fff' Present: Euline Brock, Jim kngelbrecht, Ivan Glasscock, and Fran 1 I Morgan Absent: Judd Holt, William xamman, end Etna K1ker 1 Present from Staff: Frank Robbins, Executive Director for P Administrator; Jerry lanning and Development= Elisabeth Evans, Planning Water/Wastewater; Joe Clark ClAisistxnt Engineer aAttorneyl, and Olivia Carson, clerk-Typist Chairperson Brock called the meeting to order, I. Consider approval of minutes of the special called meeting of March 7, 1990. It was moved by Ms. Brock, seconded by Mr, Engelbrecht, and unanimously carried (4•0) to approve the minutes of the March 7, 1990, meeting, It. Hold a public hearing and consider approval of the i preliminary and final plat of the Fry Additton, Lot LOR, Block S1 being a replat of Lots 7 and 10, Block S, and the I south 3j feet of Lot G, Block S. Ms. Evans presented the staff report. The tract is 0,111 located acres at the southeast intersection of University Drive andAnnaStreet,. The property is toned commercial and development of a fast-food restaurant with a drlve•through window is anticipated, The current building and carwash on the site will be removed. Petitlonerr Bud Hau tmsnn, Metro lex En inearln pp p 1 d ll o t• that he represents the owners. the old 1hareoal holler er f Restaurant and carwash currently on the site will be removed I and a new Kentucky Fried Chicken Restaurant will be !I constructed, Ms. Brock asked it the old Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant f will be closed. } Mr, Hau toann sold yes. It will be leased or sold. The new standardshof KentuckyiFriedaChicken,meet th• current In favors none present. R Opposed: none present. Mr. Glasscock moved to approve the preliminary and final plats of the Fry Addition, Lot 10R, Block Si being a replat of Lots 7 and l0, Block S, and the south 31 fast of Lot 0, Block S. Seconded by Mr, Engelbrecht and unanimously carried (4•0). I11. Consider extending the Capital Improvement Plan Schedule. Mr, Robbins reported that the Finance Department his received potentially bad news about ad valorem tax revenues, They x111 be lowered enough to change the City's thatncanlbe sllordedFininow generaltbonds.doThefigures are preliminary. More will be received in May and August. ~I I PU Minutes March 28, 1990 Page 2 Staff suggests waiting until May to sate a decision on the 1 CIE so that staff can recommend a more realistic CIP. A 1 public hearing could be held on June 20, 1990, and final + action could be taken June 27, 1990. That would still meet the 90 day time frame required to transmit the Information to the City Manager. 1 Ms. Brock asked how close the new schedule would to to the if absolute deadline. Mr. Robbins replied that the CIP recommendation must be r transmitted to the City Council by the end of July. The E Council can receive it at any time in July. It Is f transmitted to the City Manager and he provides it to the City Council. This does nave to actually be yut on a meeting agenda, It just has to be given to them. It was moved by Mr. Glasscock to extend the CIE schedule as discussed, seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht, and unanimously carried (a 0). ,I IV. Director's Report. Mr. Robbins reported that work on the toning ordinance rewrite will be delayed, Ms, Brady is going to work for the f City of Dallas. She has over an hour drive to Denton each day and It has been difficult for her. It is a great talent that the City of Denton Is losing, Hopefully, this will not delay revisions to the sign ordinance. It usually takes three mon"S to get a new person and staff will be looking { E for ways to pick up the slack. The tonlnS ordinance will have to wait on the new planner, Y. Discussion of future agenda items. ~ Mr, Robbins statei that the Greenbelt Plan will be on the i next agenda. WORK SESSION Discuss Greenbelt Plan. Mr. Robbins stated that the formal documents for the Greenbelt { Plan will be on the next meeting, so outside discussion has been planned. During earth month, the City Council will pass a resolution to be effective on earth day regarding the greenbelt. E The greenbelt Is environmentally sensitive. The resolution will call for it to be shown on the City's approved concept map. The ( greenbelt consists of the 100 year floodplain according to PEMA. The concept sap will graphically depict the policy found in the parks section of the entah Development Plan (DDP) that says the 100 year floodplain should be a greenbelt. A special section will be added to the DDP regarding Sreenbelts and 100 year floodplain i policy. This section will be more specific than what is stated to the parks section. The documents for the next setting will have the existing policy statements and ordinances dealing with the reenbelt and floodplain, It is a voluminous amount of material. lot of it relatas to drainaSe. The idea Is to leave the ' floodplain in Its natural state to accommodate flood water. Mr, Robbins continued to tnuserate the purpose of the retabolt and the development of policies to protect it. Am said that tonin regulations need to provide in ontive to encoutage implementation of the raenbelt plan. Today the floodplain can be developed, it is dift~cult to develop in the floodway. The developer must prove that the development will not raise the flood heights an where else. Between the floodweh and the (rings of the floodplairk development is allowed. That is why theta needs to be incentives to leave the floodway natural, The park dedication polity is a request. It is not required, Staff Is proposing a stratatic goal committee mnde up mostly of staff to report on the goals that are 1l 7 , . t i f. ,r. r EXCERPT j~ PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES March 21, 1990 6. RECEIVE FIRST DRAFT OF UTILITY DEPARTMENT 1991-1995 CAPITAL r E PLAN. Extensive review and discussion took place on this item. Each { Director presented his portion of the draft capital improvements plan to the Board. No action was taken by the Board at this time. They r did request a special meeting to study the CIP more thoroughly. Thompson also asked for a copy of the solid waste report. LaForte i suggested that the Board will need to review several reports from Solid Waste, and he further requested staff to arrange an orientation 1 session between the new departments and the Board. I` j ,A } 5.1.E _ 11 I 68i9U:7 k j ; 6 /I ,f E, f l: Mo] 7 1 Minutes,,. j PLANNING WD ZONING COMMISSION Psbcdary la. 1990 Y The regular neetlag Of the Planning and Zoning Cosdtiasion of the City of Denton, Taus, wee held on Wednesday, yebeuacy le, 1990, at 5:00 p.m. at the Municipal Building, 215 E. McKinney. Present: Euline stock, its Eagelbracht, Ivan Glasscock, Judd Holt, William Kamman. Etha Kiker, and roan Mocgaa Present from Staff: Lloyd Kartell. City Manages; Icank Bobbins, Executive Dicectot for Planning and Development; Elizabeth Evats, Planning Adainistestor; Owen Yost. Urban Plannec: Joao Beady. Urban Plannec; David Salmon. Engineering; Lee Allison, Watec/Mastewatet: Renee Baker. Mater/Wastewatar: Joe Mortis, Assistant City Attorney; Cache Caesoa, Administrative Analyst: Joe Thompson, Alepoct Manager; Jostle Orr, Director of Library: ■nd e' Olivia Carson, Clack-Typist W08K SESL= Discuss capital tmproveaent Program (CIP) Mt. Robbins stated that one of the CIP Issues discussed by the Public Utilities Board (PUB) is the way that 1500,000 allotted tot plan lines should be spent. The PUB considered limiting the money to hot industrial ptospecto only. It would not be spent toe conaceial or residential land uses or for vacant land. Me. Brock asked how this would affect the City's ability to help a residential developer in as area where development is desired. Mc. Bobbins said it would not have ■n effect. The ptevious sltuatllines to be evaluated on an ad hoc policy would concernin cover the ciadidate Ms. Stock asked if commercial or residential developer would have some utility line assistance. ; Mr. Harrell stated that the PUB discussed it and conclur,W that it could be dealt with during the nocmel CtP process. Me. Stock clarified that such development would be assisted by i , the regular CIP process instead of through plan Liao. 1 f He. Allison sstd yes. The intent was not to extend lines tuether out but to served unfilled avast within the City. Ms. Morgan asked it that* age residential ateas within the rata pact of tbo City that ace not on the sewer system. Me. Bobbing said no. Thera ace separate CIP issues toe service to people within the City. Another category is residential and coaaetclal development and another one it Waste The ppIan to to attract industry. Aid wit be balanced against talill. The City does not want to extend lines too tat out but doss vast to attract tadustty to taprove the tax bass. He continued that the PUS will make a recouandation at the April 11, 1990 meeting attar a public beating. The Planning and Zoning Coraissioh will have a special resting on April 1s, 1990 tot a CIP public hearing. This will be instead of the previously scheduled April 1, 1990 meeting. Me. Bobbins added that a third issued is uataq impact tams as a source of CIP funding. This is not a good time to start that practice. The City must comply with Senate Sill 336 regarding pro rate water lines. i _ I yy f Flo 31 A ~ 1 e, P&Z Minutes $ •p February 14, 1990 Page 2 f Me. Allison explained that charging pro cats for lines extended a by the City is an impact tea. It the line is extended by a developer. the pro rata is not an impact tee. To comply with the SB 116, the over sire ordinance will be classed up and pro cats will be eliminated. It is okay to continuo collecting pro cats until June 20. 1990. our peo tats is a propet peecahtage. Agree June 20, the legislative amendment must be met. Staff will provide options and find out what othet cities sea doing. A committae could be formed to examine these. If developers are on the review board they may be biased but they will be watchdogs to make sure that teas work. Cost is cast and they cannot dispute the percentage required to covet it. Mr. Allison continued that the booster station is under design and is part of this year's CIP. The neighbors appeared before PUB East night and PUB autbocizad a butted tank design. only 2 feet of the tanks will be above ground. TM vote was spilt y. (3-2). A building will cover the pumps like a small house or shed. The exterior will be brick and there will be a hatch or skylight to allow removal of the pumps every 10 cc 15 years. Ms. Brock asked about the landscaping and screening. Mr. Allison replied that there will three landscaping strips to serve as buffets and green space. The neighbors wanted the tanks burisd. Tha design will proceed for underground cooks. The Commission and City Council will have an opportunity for final review. REGULAR SESSION i Chairperson Brock called the meeting to order. 1. Hold a public hearing on the Capital Improvement Plan. David Atno, Chairman of the Denton Airport Board, I reviewed the Soard's CIP requests with the Commission. He said that they must took at the airport's future and role in North Texas. The State Aeronautics Association did a study which indicated that the Denton airport will have a mayor place in North Texas aviation. The North j I Texas Council of Govocassats had statist findings. f Several ujot area airports ate reaching saturation and E 1 are looking tot additional resources. Two airports ideally suited fat expansion are Denton and McKinney. The City must look at what role it wants and expperts in E the expansion of Notch Tesas air travel. Tven it a large `f airport to built to South Dallas Denton could be a tsedst airport or could become a mayor airport on its own. It cannot it there is no effort exerted. Denton must show interest in its airport and encourage the FAA. He continued that the ustee plan tot the airport indicates a need for a second runway. Light aircraft can use the current runway but a major runway is needed. The Airport Board recommends that a new master plan for the airport be developed. Denton suet be a leader and sephasire its I tole in aviation. It has to work with the FAA and pay its :hats. Mt. Holt asked what type of aircraft would case to Denton It the Boatel had the type of airport it wants. Mt. Arno replied that DPM and Love will be saturated by the year 2000. They must be fed by mullet airports or have their traffic diverted elsawbete. Traffic around those airports is alteady bad. Denton has access to a major highway and can use halicoptet and commutot planes to feed DFN and Love. It ewild become a regional cartist tot Texas airlines dapeadinq on the amount of expansioA at other sirporte. Meachus is alroadf full. Due to its geographic location tot surface and air traffic, Denton can have a major airport vbich would benefit the city. 6 i a EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES r.,,.,•. February 13, 199u 11. DISCUSS UTILITY DEPARTMENT FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN. Introduction Nelson stated that this item was placed on the agenda to receive direction from the Board and indicated staff is prepared to review some items on planned CIP issues, Discussion LaForte addressed the Board stating tnat the public hearing was held and everyone was given a very fair hearing. The public hearing was closed and tonight the Board will deliberate among themselves. J LaForte asked staff the timetable on the four water storage tanks. Allison gave the following inforreation: Tank #1 will be installed in 1990. Tank r2 will be installed in 1996. Tank 03 will be installed in 2007. Tank #4 will be installed in 2015. LaForte asked if it was correct that in 5U years there would ,e little difference in costs between the two types of installation, below vs above ground. j Allison advised that, assuming city growth takes place as i anticipated, the life cycle cost analysis is: -Above ground -nd ^;a a tanks below Ground Storage Tanks lil 0al 2 OW4 352,T7T,Uuu or, ' S 3609000 difference With proper operation and maintenance, the underground tanks can last f indefinitely. Nelson stated that, in addition to the debt service cost of $32,000 per year, there is also another $18,000 to $50,000 annual cost to maintain underground tanks. Thompson asked if costs concerning sound abatement were included in the costs as mentioned. Nelson stated no. However, the issue of sound level could be addressed by putting an enclosure around the area. LaForte asked about any anticipated problems with soil in the area. Previous reviews regarding underground tanks stated a concern with soil structure in the area. f { ii I 1 T - 00i FW ~~...r~ Excerppt Minutes r Page 2 I } Allison stated this is a concern. The utility will have to watch back fill conditions and be sure of a stable foundation. LaForte stated that, obviously, the City can't move from the site, but could probably go with the underground tank because of the impact it will have over the whole city. What might be gained in taxes will offset the extra cost over a 50 year period. Motion Thompson made a motion that the Board return to its original decision of underground storage for this facility. Second by LaForte. Vote: Chew No Laney No Thompson Yes LaForte Yes Frady Yes i Motion carried, 3-2 i Discussion Nelson stated that with that directive, staff will instruct the I engineer to do the design for underground tanks and forward to the I Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. LaForte stressed staff roust make known to the City Council what has a transpired over this whole issue. k i i f i I t. E f ~ , i Owl } EYCF.RPT PUBLIC UTIL11LES BOARD MINUTES February 7, 1990 2. WORK SESSION ON UTILITY DEPARTMENT 1991-95 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Introduction Nelson opened the discussion by reviewing with the Board and PdZ members present the schedule of activities devel,sped for the Utility Department Five Year Capital Improvements Plan and Budgeting process. Nelson explained that, at this time, the Department is primarily looking at projects for 1995, the previous four year's being fairly set. He explained the flexibility of the utility Department CIP vs General Government CIA. Re-organization Mr. Nelson introduced Charles Watkins of the Solid Waste Department and Jack Jarvis, Manager of the Garage/Vehicle Maintenance. He explained that there has been a reorganization in the City and Nelson will assume responsibility for all enterprise departments, i.e., Solid Waste, Landfill, Garage, Storm Drainage Utility and the Machine Shop. Storm Water Utility Nelson reviewed the issues rega;•ding stormwater drainage advising I that staff is looking at establishing a storm water utility in which every piece of property in the community is looked at, that property's contribution to the storm water determined, and it is then accessed a monthly fee. This fee will help the City to maintain and construct the water ways that will be required. Nelson added the storm drainage will continue to straddle between j General Government and Utilities UI.tiI a five year Capital Improvements Plan is set up. Solid Waste projects have generally been programmed in when the projects were needed. The Staff would like to look at anticipated costs and equipment needed from year to year, to analyze revenue streams needed. Board/P&Z/CC will be working together to identify our role in this review process. Discussion: LaForte asked how the storm drainage utility would be financed. Through taxes or a user's fee. Nelson stated that revenues tend to come in as a user fee. City of Bedford has already set up a utility. We must begin with a survey, then determine overall flows (quality/quantity), and establish a rate. For instance, an asphalt plant require a much higher fee than a residential area. LaForte added that another point to be addressed here is that this is not something the city is being asked to do, the City has to do this, and we have to protect the health of the people in the community. ?r Excerppt Minutes Page 2 Nelson reviewed the revised regulations and advised that the 1912 Clean Water Act listed stormwater as one of the items that needed cleaning up. Ray Roberts Water Plant and Off-Site Facilities I LaForte requested tnat Nelson explain the issue that will be coming up in the public hearing regarding the water tank at liartlee Field Road the costs, etc., since this issue will come to them when the Utility Department goes to the PAZ for platting. Nelson advised that about two years ago a site selection study was conducted for the water plant at Lake Ray Roberts, the pump to ' Denton, and a place for a storage tank and pump. A storage facility , was needed on the north end of town. The Utility already has a plant on the south end of town and the city can get economies of scale by using the north side for installation of the water storage tank. The site selected is on a direct route from the Lake to the east, on a hill where you can save the water pressure, and the site has an Arco gas line, pump line, transmission lines and is not a site suitable for building homes. Nelson advised that the site selection was reviewed and approved by the Board, presented to the PAZ, approved by the PAZ and submitted to the City Council, who also approved the purchase of the property. 1 The artist rendition of the site and installations were shown to those present. :I Chairman of the PAZ requested staff to indicate on a map the site + location in relation to any houses in the area. This was done. Considerable discussion continued regarding the location of the facilities in relation to the neighborhood. Nelson advised that the underground tanks originally proposed by the Board would be cast in place, built into the hill, and a considerable amount of landscaping is planned. Development Plan Water A Sewer Lines The Board discussed with the PAZ the issue concerning the current Development Plan Water and Sewer Lines policy. The Board stated that after a one year use of this policy, it has been determined that the policy does not work. Although the Utility is willing to set aside the $500,000 per year for industrial development, such industrial development must be a committed prospect, the term "hot prospect" must be re-defined, that the policy as it is now will be recinded and a new, more effective policy recommended to the City Council and that the Utility will abandon the position of "leading growths and move to one of "responding" to growth. This will be a more cost effective policy. 6819U:1-2 j. EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES Februiry 7, 1990 2. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING UTILITY DEPARTMENT 1991-95 CAPITAL PLAN, MKOLMNO _ I LaForte opened the hearing by explaining to those in attendance that they could come forward to address the Board, give their name and address, and make their statements. he advised they would be given unlimited time to present their views and concerns. After each person gave their presentation, the Chairman asked for further comments or questions from those present. After receiving an outline of the CIP process by Nelson, the citizens were heard in the following order: Mr. Lloyd Ballard presented general concerns to the Board regarding e a owe group water tank for Hartlee Field Road. Mr. Fritz Poppy stated he was concerned because his house was right next to where the above ground tank would be placed. He felt the Board ought to consider accessing to Sherman Drive, Mr. Ray McFarland spoke in favor of underground concrete tanks and ± rev ewe the possible life cycle costs of the project, he also I stated that the soil formations were appropriate for such underground installations. Mrs. Mitchell advised she was most concerned about the visual effect o t Fe tan s, the property value impact of the proposed above ground home tanks and also, the futuro of the small tract of ground between her and the treatment plant. Mr. Walt Parker was in attendance to lend support to the presen ons o he residents of the area. Mrs. Nancy Beck stated the noise of the pumps was of great concern To er. ! Mr. Jim Roberts indicated that property devaluations were inevitable. The w ole spirit of the community would be changed. Mrs. Betsy Lou Dobson spoke of concerns regarding aesthetics and the Toss o her ome as she envisioned it. She lives 323' from the site. Mr. Paul Reece mentioned litigation. Mr. Earl Shaffer stated he is an adjacent owner and is very concerned I about the e g of above ground tanks and the fact that people will have to come across his property through the right-of-way, and no one has spoken with him about that. T T~ .d~ lr Except Minutes , Page 2 1 Mrs. Barbara Russell stated she is concerned about beautification an an values. r i j r1r. bud Cole, County Commissioner, was there to support the c zens ar iee Field area as their official representative. He stated the property owners had asked him to state their concerns regarding property values, chemical storage, sound of the pumping units and aesthetics. He commented he was pleased to hear the Board's statements that they will look into some of these areas. Mr, Wayne _Dockery stated he was spokesman for the group and reviewed areas o concern, i.e., environment, property values, aesthetics, noise and beautification. Ms, Norma Gamble came forward to state for the record that they now understand a contract to install water on Bonnie Brae Street was due soon, but wanted to request sewer service for their neighborhood. There being no further public comment, it was the consensus of the Board to re-study the above ground storage tank issue taking into j consideration the expressed concerns of those present, Chairman laforte closed the Public Hearing and W ourned the meeting at I approximately 9:00 PM. r E f ' P I 6819U:3.4 I } I A ~f I v i F i i CITY i COUNCIL a 1 i ,a ,~Y✓I I ~ I t ~ S4 M!1 1 { 1 ~ .f ~Ow yi o0O E OGGOa I I ml Fir 1 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 3 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Condemnation - Willowsprings Drainage Project I RECOMMENDATION: Approve resolution authorizing condemnation of the easements in the Geo Prock Estate Tract SUMMARY: Stanley Lattman, attorney for the above mentioned estate has not responded to several letters and numerous telephone calls to settle this matter BACKGROUND: To facilitate the planned improvements to the existing drainage channel, additional easements must be secured. These easements are necessary to accommodate the relocation of a sanitary sewer I line and adequate construction maneuverability during construction of the drainage and utilities, i PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Capital improvements Project, Transportation and Engineering 111 Department and Utility Department/Drainage Division ' FISCAL IMPACT: The drainage improvements will reduce maintenance cost by , concreting portions of the channel and making a typical section R (sloping sides to 3 to I grade). 4773E =Agar r . i i I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CGNDEMNATION OF REAL PROPERTY NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS NEAR WILLOW SPRINGS DRIVE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton has determined that it is necessary to acquire the easements described herein in order to make certain drainage and utility improvements; and ; WHEREAS, the City of Denton has been unable to agree with the owners of the real property upon the value of the easements to be acquired; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION I. That the City Attorney of the City of Denton ill authorized and directed to bring condemnation proceedings to obtain the following easements: A. Permanent utility and drainage easements in Tracts I and 11 as described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, for the purpose of I constructing, reconstructing, installing, repairing, and maintaining storawatkr drainage improvements and utilities in, upon, and across the land, with the right ! of having ingress and egress in and across the land for ll those purposes. i~ F. A temporary easement in the land described in Exhibit i "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, for the purpose of permitting the agents and contractors of the City to enter upon the property with vehicles, tools, and equipment to make temporary dumps of excavated soil and construction material, and to do whatever is necessary to make the proposed drainage and utility improvements within the permanent easements described above. I SECTION ii. That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. } E i I I i I w C l I t P PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1990. !1 { BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR I ~ ; ~ I S E ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY a BY. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: Q 11 n h/l { 1 prockre f I i r ~ 'i f 1 1 1 I ti`[ ~ F EXHIBIT OAO TRACT I ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the S.C. Hirams Survey, Abst. No. 616 and being part of Lot No. 1, Block A of the Shady Oaks Industrial Park Subdivision, an addition to the City and county of Denton, and also of being part of a tract of land as conveyed from Gabriel Milton Daspit, Jr. to George Frock, et al by deed dated February 28, 1980 and recorded in Volume 1003, Page 103 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the wasterly northwest corner of said Lot 1, said point also lying in the south boundary line of an existing 60' drainage and public utility easement and the east right-of-way line of a north/south public road known as Duncan Street, said point also bring the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 69,351, a central angle of 530 53' 13.90, and a chord bearing and length of north 660 35' 31.5' east, 62.861: THENCE northeasterly along said curve to the left, same being the northwest boundary line of said Lot 1 and the southeast boundary line of said 60' drainage and publin utility easement an arc j distance of 65.23' to a point for = nerl THENCE south 500 21' 104 east a distance of 10.0' to a i for corners point I THENCE south 390 38' 50,0' west a distance of 40.0' to the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 10011 a j central angle of 250 50' 31.00, and a chord bearing and length of south 520 34' 05,5' west, 44.1211 THENCE southwesterly along said curve to the right an arc distance of 45.10' to a point for corners THENCE south 390 38' 50,0' west a distance of 11.49' to a point lying in the west boundary line of said Lot 1 and the east right- of-way line of said Duncan Street for cotnerl THENCE north 030 32' 20" east along the west boundary line of said Lot 1 and the eaat right-of-way line of said Duncan Street a distance of 48.33' to the Place of Beginning and containing 1728,57 square feet of land. I I 3 t ,F i EXHIBIT 'A' (Con't) TRACT II ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the S.C. Hirams Survey, Abet. No. 616 and being part of Lot No. 2, Block A of the Shady Oaks Industrial Park Subdivision, an addition to the City and County of Denton, and also of being part of a tract o! land as conveyed from Gabriel Milton Daspit, Jr. to George Prock, et al by deed dated February 28, 1980 and recorded in Volume 1003, Page 703 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northearit corner of said Lot 21 said point also lying in the south boundary line of an existing 60' drainage and public utility easement. and the west right-of-way line of a north/south public road known as Willow Springs Drivel i r THENCE south 30 32' 20' west along the east boundary line of said Lot 2 and the west right-of-way line said Willow Springs Drivo a distance of 10.0' to a point for corner! THENCE north 850 49' 00' west 10.0' south of and parallel to the north boundary line of said Lot 1 a distance of 20.45' to the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 37.61, a central angle of 540 32' 24.68, and a chord bearing and length of south 660 54' 54' west, 34.4611 THENCE southwesterly along said curve to the left 10.0' southeast J of and parallel to the northwest boundary line of said Lot 2 an i1 are distance of 35.79' to a point lying 10.0' southeast of and perpendicular to the northwest boundary line of said Lot 2 for cornerl } THENCE north 500 21' 10' west a distance of 10.0' to a point { lying in the northwett boundary line of said Lot 2 and southeast j boundary line of said 60' drainage and public utility easement, ! 1{ said point also being the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 47.6', a central angle of 540 32' 21.61, and 1 a chord bearing and length of north 660 54' 54.2' east, 43.621 THENCE northeasterly along said curve to the right an arc distance of 45.31' to a point for cornerl THENCE south 850 49' 00" east along the north boundary line of said Lot 2 and the south boundary line of said 60' drainags and public utility easement a distance of 20.34' to the Place of Beginning and containing 609.47 square feet of land. f r, EXHIBIT 'B' i i ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the City and County of Denton, state of Texas, and being part of the S.C. Hirams Survey, Abst. No. 616 and being part of Lots No. 1 and 21 Block A of the Shady Oaks industrial I Park Subdivision, an addition to the City and County of Denton, and also of being part of a tract of land as conveyed from Gabriel Milton Daspit, Jr. to George Prock, et al by deed dated February 28, 1960 and recorded in Volume 1003, page 703 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and more particularly described as follows: i COMMENCING at the northeast corner of said Lot 2, said oint lying in the south boundary line of an existing 60' drainage nand public utility easement and the west right-of-way line of a north/ south public road known as Willow Springs Drive) THENCE south 30 32' 20' west along the east boundary line of said Lot 2 and the west right-of-way line said Willow S rin s I Drive a distance of 10.0' to the POINT OF BEGINNING) p g THENCE south 30 32' 20" west along the east boundary line of I said Lot 2 and the west right-of-way line of said Willow Spring. Drive a distance of 40.0' to a point for cornea THENCE north 850 49' 000 west 50.0' south of and parallel to the north boundary line of said Lot 2 a distance of 19.67' to a { point for corners THENCE south 390 38' 50' west 50.0' southeast of and parallel to the northwest boundary line of said Lot 2j boundary line of Lot 2 and the north boundary linas the esofg said Lot south1 and continuing for a total distance of 679.28' to a point lying in the west boundary line of said Lot 1 and the east right-ofway line of a north south public road known as Duncan Street for cornea THENCE north 30 32' 2011 east along the west boundary line of said Lot 1 and the east right-of-way line of said Duncan Street a distance of 84.84' to a point for corners THENCE north 390 38' 50' east a distance of 11.49' to the , beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 100.011 a F central angle of 250 50' 318, and a chord bearing and length of north $20 34' 05.50 east, 44.721) THENCE northeasterly along said curve to the left an are distance I~ of 45.10' to a point for corners ~ j f/I FF E' EXHIBIT *Be (Con't) r THENCE north 390 361 50' east a distance of 40.0' to a point lying 10.0' southeast of and perpendicular to the northwest boundary line of said Lot 1 for corner; i THENCE north 500 21' 10' west a distance of 10.0' to a point lying in the northwest boundary line of said Lot 1 and the southeast boundary line of said 60' drainage and public utility easement; ` I THENCE north 390 38' $0' east along the northwest boundary line j of said Lot 1 and the southeast boundary line of said 601 drainage and public utility easement, passing the northerly northwest corner of maid Lot 1 and the southwest corner of said Lot 2 and continuing along the northwest boundary line of said Lot 2 and southeast boundary line of said 60' drainage and public utility easement for a total distance of 516.89' to a point for THENCE south 500 21' 10' east a distance of 10.0' to the 1 beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 37,6' x central angle of 540 32' 250, and a chord bearing and length ~of north 660 54' 54' east, 34.461 ; THENCE northeasterly along said curve to the right 10.0' southeast of and parallel to the northwest boundary line of said Lot 2 an arc distance of 35.79' to a point for corner; ! THENCE south 850 49' 00' east 10.0' south of and parallel to { the north boundary line of said Lot 2 a distance of 20,45' to the ' Place of Beginning and containing 33115.49 square feet of land, t: 1 v i i 1a ExAbif A 71r4d r e s !i o' r :J. r *A,46 ~0 0,Q• P op T,RACT1 ; 13 DA4NA* t i 1 i i I f 71 rwus Ii IM: m CITY iffl:COUNCIL': Ml- 11.212711.1 I 1 IXTTF 5 XMI i O i o~ I MM X i t J. i i 1 city Of DENTON / 215 E, McKinney / Denton, Texas 78201 a MEMORANDUM j DATE: June 20, 1990 TO: John P. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance 1 PROM: Harlan L. Jefferson, Treasurer SUBJECT: REVISED INVESTMENT POLICY Per your request, I have reviewed the City's current investment policy to identify needed changes to bring it in compliance with the auditor's request. Addittonally, our policy was also reviewed by representatives of the Government Treasurer's Organization of Texas (GTOT). The GTOT recommendations are based upon a standard set of essentials/deeirable elements for an investment policy. The recommendations from both organizations have been placed in thirteon (13) general categories which are listed below. ~i _ As noted in the auditor's 1990 management letter, all of their recommendations, and the majority of the total recommendations, have been I ' implemented. However, the investment policy has not been updated to reflect these changes. The phrase 'current practice' under the status column represents the recommendations with which we have already complied. It is our intent to address all of the recommendations in the revised investment policy, unless otherwise notified h r y you, the Investment Committee or City Council. RECOMMENDATION/CATEGORY RECOMMENDATION SOURCE STATUS I. Legal Authorizations. The GTOT Implemented in legal authorizations for in the new policy vestments in state law and city ordinance or charter r are not referenced in the policy. These should be referenced and, if possible, a copy attached as an appendix for informational purposes. t i ;F I 1 John P. McGrane June 20, 1990 r Page 2 r j RECOMMENDATION/CATEGORY RECOMMENDATION SOURCE STATUS II. Cash Management. The Invest- GTOT Implemented in ment guidelines were not the new policy described in the larger context of cash management. Since investment function is actually only part of the overall cash management program which includes controlling and coordinating cash k inflows and outflows, banking j relationships, debt management and other functions, it is helpful to describe it in this context. III. Limited Liability. It is GTOT Implemented in recommended that a section the new policy be added that states the j k limits of personal liability II for investment staff acting in full conformance with this 4 policy. This could be presented along with the prudent man law as general guidelines for staff actions. Iv. Collateraltzation. The policy GTOT implemented in should state that collateral the new policy r is to be safekept by an 'independent third party.' This third party can be made a party of the governing contract with the bank (for purchase of CDs). Collateral should not be GTOT Implemented in / safekept within the same bank the new policy holding company as that from which the CDs are being purchaPed. Collateral should be valued GTOT and Auditors Current at al'.ghtly more than the book practice 0 value (Principal plus accrued interest) of the investment. I A reasonable and recognized ratio for collateral is an amount not less than 1021. { t 14 1 FJohn P. McGrane June 201 1990 'J Page 3 'If f RECOMMENDATION/CATEGORY RECOMMENDATION SOURCE STATUS 1 'Original' safe keeping GTOT and Auditors Current w receipts (with the wording practice j 'pledged to the City of Denton') (except for i must be receive] by the City to banks) evidence collateral. Sign-off for substitution and release then are functions of the safekeeping receipt. ~ r V, Competitive Bidding. The GTOT Current Investment policy does not practice specifically require competitive bidding of all investments. This is strongly recommended by ` the GTOT panel, All securities- Jf CDs and other money market 1 securities-can fluctuate for pure market reasons and all should receive three bids. VI, Swaps. The Investment polity GTOT Current does not reference swapa or practice swapping criteria. If the City j f engages in swapping, or plania to in the future, it may wish I to define criteria, obiectivea, j loss limitations, etc. f VIZ. Contractual Agreements, The GTOT Current j policy did not reference or practice JI describe guidelines for any contractual arrangements - except one reference to the depository agreement. Since 1 contracts are an essential element of the internal controls ayatem, it is recommended that the city require certain J arrangements be formalized 1 in contractual form. The fo7lowlrg contracts should be considered: o Nile Transfer Autborizations E o Collateral Safekeeping and Substitution Agreements o Master Repurchase Agreements (PSA) 3 o Depository Agreements for CDs purchase only j I -Comm ~J 1 i { a John F. McGrane June 20, 1990 Page 4 { RECOMMENDATION/CATEGORY RECOMMENDATION SOURCE STATUS VIII. Repurchase Agreements. To GTOT and Auditors Current strengthen the policies regarding practice repurchase agreements, the City 1 should consider amending the investment policy to: o Require no less than 1021 collateralization of repurchase agreements. o include a time limit for re- purchase agreements of no more than 30-days. o include a listing of approved ; } securities for use as } collateral. i Repurchase agreements under state GTOT Current law are restricted to banks practice domiciled in Texas and primary broker/dealers. The limit of authorized investments should so state to avoid any problems or misinterpretation. i Ix. Responsibility. The policy GTOT Current did not explicitly state practice i that records of investment transaction should be kept or by whom. The City of Denton should consider adding a section on this matter since record keeping is so critical a function. Banks where cash is held and Auditors Current which allow transfers between practice accounts by phone should be provided with a list of authorized accounts. In rdditton, there should be a maximum amount allowed by phone. Also, the person at the City Auditors Current !i who made the transfer by phone practice I should complete a transfer I notice and give it to the proper Pinance Department personnel. f j w / 7-7 iOFCI.~ ` ~ s John F. McGrane June 20, 1990 r+:• Page 5 f r RECOMMENDATION /CATEGORY RECOMMENDATION SOURCE STATUS The transfer confirmation received from the bank should be agreed with this notice and the appropriate journal J entry made. y X. Pooling. The policy seems to GTOT Current 1 imply that separate investments practice 4 are made for each fund in the { City. If this is the case, the 1 City should consider pooling its investments to simplify record- keeping, make liquidity easier to manager and increase yield without any additional risks. I XI. Market Lose. The policy GTOT implemented in addresses market loss and states the new policy that 'funds should not be exposed to market price risk.' However, every security - even f overnight - faces some market price risk. It should be an objective to recognize and avoid market risk at all times but the use of 'shall not'in the objectives unfairly places liability on the investing staff. i XII. RW-n. It is strongly GTO'P implemented in f recommended that the 'quarterly' the new policy j reporting guidelines called for in the policy be changed to a monthly reporting requirement. GTOT Current XiII. Investment Securities. investment section of the policy practice lists CDs at commercial banks f as acceptable investments. To fully satisfy state law and clarify the issue, it is recommended that this be expanded to say of banks domiciled in k Texas. i j , I t ~r ` r i Jahn F. McGrane June 20, 1940 Page 2 f RECOMMENDATION/CATEGORY RECOMMENDATION SOURCE STATUS E Althouqh not prohibited by law, Auditors No longer currently cities in the skate of applicable { Texas are discouraged by current state guidelines from depositing finds in savings and loans institutions. The City should s consider amending its investment policies to reflect the current environment. The revised investment policy also contains two changes initiated by staff. II I The first change will allow us to purchase U.S. Treasury securities that mature within live (5) years as opposed to only three (3) years. This will provide an opportunity to increase our yield when funds are earmarked for projects that will not occur for sometime. The second change will permit us to utilize regional brokers/dealerse This will increase the conoetitiveness of our bidding process. If you have any questions or comments, Fleass do not hesitate to contact me. f; arlan L. Jeffe _ I 'P I I 2521k •q, o: :r i I w~ r I i f 1 ~ 1 I ~I I /NMI f RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A REVISED INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE CITY OF DENTON TO REPIACE THE EXISTING INVESTMENT POLICY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. %awe WHEREAS, the Director of the Department of Finance for the City of Denton has presented a proposed policy regarding the investment of certain City funds to replace the existing investment policy and the purpose of the policy revision is to maintain a minimum of cash available to meet daily neods of the City and to provide protection for the City's principal while receiving the highest yield possible for investing temporary excess cash: and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt such revisions to the official policy regarding investment of certain funds of the City; Now, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES! t SECTION 1. The following policy revision, attached and made a part hereof, is hereby adopted as an official policy of the City of Denton, Texas: j Investment Policy (Reference No. 401.06) SECTIONS. This policy replaces Investment Policy Reference No. 408.04. i SECTION III. A copy of Investment Policy Reference No. 403.06 ' shall be filed in the official records of the City of Denton with the City Secretary. SECTIOa Iy. That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ day of 1990. BOB CASTLEBERRY$ MAYOR Pr 1 4 roll 6N ~c Fri F ~M.I1 f I ATTEST: E JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: _ I APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOV.ITCUl CITY ATTORNEY BY., C. I investm.res I J 3 1 I 1 I I r, I •r...KM rAr'Fi'n.♦..r.y♦y.9 V!.`K-1 .n♦..rr..rr w'r ♦ 1 1f1 ,a 1 1 ( M~ 1 i r~;,a r f 4 i r, CITY i 11COUNCIL. IT: IM- i f i i i r i E i of i s~ F ~ a ~ i r0 t~+0 QDOOG d ~ I I l IT: I E M I I( ~ I )i 11 f warn 1 f / August 21, 1990 CITY COUNCIL AGbNDA ITEM v~ TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL I FROM; Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager i RES REVIEW AND CONSIDER INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING POLICY RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utilities Board and the Planning and Zoning commission recommend approval of the attached Infrastructure Financing Policy. I SUMMARY/BACKGROUND i in August, 198b, the Denton Development Plan recommended an ' economic growth incentive policy that promoted balanced growth throughout the city. In response to this } recommendation, the Public Utilities Board and the Planning I and Zoning Commission, in a joint meeting in February 1989 approved the Guidelines for Fundina and Selectinq Development Plan Candidate Water and Sewer Lines. These Guidelines prescribed a process by which the Utility Department's Capital improvements Plan would set aside up to $500,000 annually for water and sewer line construction to j encourage economic growth in selected areas of the City. E The Guidelines also prescribed rating and ranking criteria by which such lines would be selected for construction. In March 1989, the Guidelines were approved by City Council and in May 1989, the Board considered funding of lines along ' Marsch branch Road. The Bo.trd also expressed its concern that several of the , Guidelines' top-ranked lines were in the southern part of the City where economic growth was already sufficient. Therefore,the Board proposed a revised Guidelines policy that abandoned the rating and ranking criteria and provided construction funds only for lines serving industrial prospects. i 1 b ( Ile- F1 ~Ii,N Yl z ~ i• Page 2 Infrastructure Financing Policy M Durina its April 3, 1990, meeting, the city council reviewed the revised Guidelines and expressed its concern with the I Board's fundamental revision of policy. Therefore, the Council directed the Board and the Commission to form a joint committee to re-examine revised policy. Pursuant to the, ita first Council's on July instructions, 10~ 1committee 990. The wCommittee reviewed the new Infrastructure Financing Policy, recommended some changes, but otherwise gave the Policy its tentative I " approval. The Committee agreed to meet again for final Policy review on July 20, 1990. At this meeting, the final approval was given. The Public Utilities Board approved the dccument on July 23, 1990, and the Planning and Zoning Commission gave their final approval on August -8p 1990. FISCAL IMPACT Both she current guidelines and the proposed Infrastructure Financing Guidelines call for up to $500,000 of annual Utility Department Capital Improvements Plan funding. No other fiscal impacts are anticipated. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED City of Denton Utilities, Developere, Citizens of the i Community, new prospects. 4 1 Respe fully gs b itted, o V. Harrell, Ci y Menager Pre ar d/1,p oved byi E. Nelson, Executive Director Department of Utilities Exhibit11 I Candidate Line History Proposed Infrastructure Financing Guidelines III Infrastructure Financing /Economic Analysis Model IV Proposed Application for Infrastructure Assistance V Minutes PUS Meeting of ]/23/90 VI Minutes CC Meeting of April 3, 1990 VII Minutes of P&Z Meeting of August-B4 1990 Ir S i 1 n ~r r,c CANDIDATE LINE HISTORY Prior to 1988, the Utility Department expended thousands of dollars constructing water and sewer lines in selected areas of the City in order to encourage growth in those areas. Unfortunately, growth in those areas failed to materialize. in August, 1988, the City Council approved and published the Denton Development Plan prepared by the City's Land Use Development Committee, one of the Committee's findings was that the City's infrastructure financing policy tended to :ollow growth instead of responding to growth and that this policy contrihuted to growth toward the southeast. The Committee felt that this policy should be changed to one that promoted balanced growth throughout the City. In response to the Development Plan, the Public Utilities Hoard in November, 1988 proposed a Utility Department infrastructure financing policy that would promote balanced economic: growth throughout the city. Pursuant to this policy, a list of over 100 possible routes for residential and commoercial lines was solicited from the public and staff. In February, 1989, the Public Utilities Board and the Planning and Zoning Commission jointly approves the Gu o tnd Se ec ing DDeveloweat P190 canifia"Hawlattr on some-1 to p ement the new n rastructure .nanc nq poi y. The Quidelings prescribed a procedure by which the Utility Department cap tal f Improvement Plan annually allocated up to $500,000 for water and sewer Candidate Line construction. The Guidelines also established a criteria by which the list of proposed Candidate Lines would to rated and ranked, and selected for i construction. In March, 1989, the Guidelines were approved ¢ by the City Council. In May, 1989, the Utility Department staff completed the rating and ranking of the Candidate Lines and presented them to the Board for approval. The Board expressed its concern that several of the top-ranked Lines were in the southern part of the City where economic growth was already sufficient and did not need the stimulus of special funding. Finally, the Board approved funding for a combination of i, Lines near and along Masch Branch Rd. in the far western ` area of the City. However, due to a lack; of support from many landowners along Match Branch Rd. a,r well as Utility Department budget constraints during the 1989 fiscal year, the Board declined to recommend funding of these Lines to the City Council. E)(WBIT 1 r U 4 J ' ~ I I WWI CANDIDATE LINE HISTORY PAGE 2 d The Board continued to express its concerns about the Gu Jelin s' selection process. Consequently, the Candidate Line fund ng and selection process was put in abeyance until January, 1990. At that time, the Board proposed a revised Guidelines policy that would follow rather than lead economic growth. The new policy would also do away with the rating and ranking of proposed Lines and would make funds available only to construct Lines that would serve industrial prospects which had committed to building facilities in Denton. i E At its April 3, 1990 meeting, the city council expressed its concerns regarding the Board's fundamental revision of Guidelines' policy. Therefore, it directed the Board and the Planning and Zoning Commission to further examine the proposed policy change. Consequently, these two bodies appointed two members each to jointly examine the revised policy, its implementation, and its integration with the City's overall economic development policy. ~ E I r ~ F ` I I I i a ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY / PROCEDURE SUBJECT: d ~ G INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING T ®je"~ `ice T I T M w~6~twATdt -y` INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING GUIDELINES UTILITIES ~I~ FFIFnVt DAM UK At L Funding Policy The City of Denton Utilities Department policy is to facilitate local economic growth through a program of infrastructure financing. During its annual review of the Utiiity Department's Capital Improvements Plan ICIP1, the Public Utilities Board shall consider the allocation of up to $500,000 annually to finLAce the construction of infrastructure water and/or sewer lines. This allocation shall consist of $250,000 from the Water CIP and $250,000 from the Wastewater CIP. I That portion of each annual allocation that remains unobligated at close of the fiscal year shall carry forward into the following fiscal year. However, the cumulative total of said k unobligated annual allocations shall not exceed $2 million at any time. Selection Policy . Infrastructure financing shall be provided only tos 11 industrial prospects which have committed to building facilities in Denton 21 commercial/retail prospects which have committed to building facilities in Denton and which: i a1 sell a majority of their goods or services to individuals j or businesses outside of Denton, and/or b1 manufacture goods for consumption in Denton which were previously manufactured outside of Denton d 31 Corporate headquarters prospects which have committed to building facilities in Denton All requests for Infrastructure financing shall be subject to the economic analysis detailed in this Policy. This analysis shall determine project costs and benefits over a five year. Infrastructure financing shall be available only if project benefits are equal to or exceed project costs. EXHIBIT ' r, - - fCpF nuec~r~ i ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY / PROCEDURE Y r - Page_ 2 For purposes of the economic analysis Project costs shall consist of 100% oft . debt service associated with the subject line's ~r construction, and return on investment associated with the completed subject line Project benefits shall consist of 25% of: II . revenue from ad valorum tax on prospect's local property, plant and equipment . revenue from sales tax on prospect's products and services sold by the Denton facility . revenue from sales tax on local purchases by the Denton-resident labor force generated by prospect's locating in Denton and 100% of: r revenue from sales tax on prospect's local purchase of its facility's construction materials 1 revenue from that portion of the prospect's local consumption of Denton utilities that is contributed toward the return on investment Funding of prospects shall be based on their dates of applications i.e., first come, first served j . Lines under consideration shall begin at an existing City k { main line and end at closest technically feasible edge of the prospect's property j The funding recoiamandation shall state funding limits for i the total project and its construction components as well as a time limit on the funding committment . Funds shall be disbursed to the prospect or the prospect's f designee only as follows: 1) upon presentation of a Certificate of occupancy for the prospect's Denton facility, or 2) in intermittment payments as construction of the subject utility line progresses unexpended project funds shall be returned to the infrastructure I financing account i Ile- W- 7L t i} ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY / PROCEDURE r Apslicati_on Process Page- 3 r Step 1 Infrastructure Financing applications shall be available from the City's Economic Development office. This Office AP4^ shallt rr provide prospect with economic assistance information { provide prospect with an application form and assist with its completion notify affected Departments of prospect's application . coordinate the prospect's access to City Departments c, prepare an economic assistance package for the prospect Step 2 i y Completed applications shall be returned to the Economic Development office which shall foirward a copy of the prospect's completed application toi I Planning Department - prepares land use analysis Utilities Department - prepares five year economic analysis, 1 and technical and cost; assessment of providing utility service 1 to the prospect Step 3 i The Public Utilities Board shall review the prospect's application, the technical issues of providing utility service to the prospect, and th4 ompleted economic analysis and forward a recommendation for funding consideration to the Planning and i Zoning Commission. Such recommendation may support the prospect's request for a variance of those provisions of the Sub-Division ordinance regarding the extension of utility lines. Stop 4 . The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the prospect's applicat!en, a completed land use analysis, and the economic analysis recommendation from the Public Utilities Board and forward both recommendations to the City Council. CLPOLICY-DOC 1 f ! r r 6 r _ a} ass !H - 77 r t E N 1 r ' ~ r met) i A 1 k _ .C ! ! I r7 ItI \ I M M M 1 r • V i V N N ~ • s:~_...r i 7 x E y A ~ r 1 C6 s w w w X .n ~ i wr•~ii ~$Y . r Y ! nix Z, a 1 w 'rr i! i ' r ; . Ij a i iz x Fri e Sfe V. s r^ i= ti V M F : x ai►►~. i £ r = * ~ ~ r r ? SxY' • • 1 A ` Y H • i g = i K i . • A 'Sees g 1 Q V Y V I R Ji 4 A I ~ d "r l t_ 4 w ~ q I 6 - » ri s ~ M L I ri. `e w L rt i'.- ~ • 11 M w S p r f V ` N R w M 1 1 I , i J a~ i awwI 1 ha 1 lnfrutrotWrs MsIIUItoIltaau oalrsts oosll slrrtti~e , i lla 4 NOW 1 I IN nsr Plinio $ioo a IUOOrs anM fiMOcal } iruutotic". A lacer tore 111M fools Iffect Iolvas rcliltility. v I costrectia cat is ottatn by ailitl karum suit. j 't 'KIM" naer Costs Iles JA for Ieoortalt Iolilistruta. i Il Dolt orna is onsiatos If a 11 Ioml oriecial avow so I I.St howl lturesl "goat. li tstfro as lonsuot to tit Of ford fow if Irnicom a to Plol. arrlrrin a of caotroctia cat. 11 CUM Cat foul is coloaN of kit llmn Ila tours a Irtresto . ti kodiu loul is awe" of: Sala lot know fro: . Indsou Ps WOW . notPmiea auritls' porcMa .Itility Revenue I Pont Iafrlltrocuro MIUUInfkaatC WINsis 9*1 Isrntin i We I f proot"I in Ioooe U Iffsialm o $0.11 Nr SIN of a lkot's aim, ormrtp, IM Nomw gala. it it omww Pat 114 of We (I m sill Os tirmlf Ittril"I'l to III Nillif kwUm's im4al. ile Nllar !!!1 "In of this "Marline If noun" of tin on alwel III San, i If sales fit It"m im to asolkot's local ale of Itoshnis W Nrgkes it prwlatw aI ".It W Il of twu ales. 11 is upetw toot fit of tits ferias fill J to sifectlf Itt d"Is to the Nilltl frurtmt'a iolotwt. IM Nllaf 1 0 ie 1Jt No of this Ioftes 11 rwosww by IM Ifs HsnI lot to". -Ht*- Sala Ise k"Oot fro folnwt It omtAtw o e suafoile 3 ioan factor of aN. It Is eoktes UNI at toast Im of tin Ioliaw's fsplMO f111 sits is kwa aw list aei w of tiese NgWMWM folnfo Ills. it lots- oforsU to assiUMi 6111-Mrs of folaall for faer kotoarosift" taelonee. I k 1 i d 1~ ~YI J I' . plot J Inf NItr UCSlrI al111l/ktlftpeDolt aAa1la11 +adtl Nprlile! LOW ' Nelblf I Ills tat 14"m fro$ corotroctioe ii oruialed a Sit of to orolect's tat Nino emo" a cmtrretim "terlals asd Ill of that uurials NJM hresaPol IN MIN, ► CaicdatiDo of lathlf electric r1e."I 31 Pruiuted a the electric l ! conwtloo of to nillip aoeliaet '"tiny of sUilar site. IAa a loci facility With. co"mtiol Is braid as the sosliciat's naatu or tilt IuiliU's stn, iatIAM "t, ehleho". Its electrical Ines chip. 14144ribPiim to Mure a Isvtot"1t 11011 Perm" rprontlo the s rtiho of tM a"lla"ys aaticiated Itility "flow that pill lecea to the ADJ. Is 1lectrtt I1"M till W1114ey N oronik to as uoliast older to otseul Went loll rate sc Mhle. Y/pr tAtl INSa.If. IN first 2311 In 'I are PAIN at Mid tats ar in; III aeditioui Ira's era billed it the row oI .013 coil a► in. Is utitla. all to a In billed at tM Ihor/y Cat edlwtalt IfChI r1 tf Of .Ilf c"u ar in, Ahot11y 1#IS11 h caul to tM hiM"111 "la hri ~ is twiltrol a I tauhor's pay hour W h billed it the flu of vm Per in. to facility turn is 121 ar M pry of sorviPo, 21 CAlulstia of Ioouly Pour rotesu is build a the Dour ca"mel" at IN evletis$ WIRM Imility of Ilailor ein, vue j a nee fuilttt etiau, chosmtim is mm a the mlic"I's Haas" or the ficllity'I /"loll, 1rum" M. sy aPi1"Pi. i fates unite pill acridly N Irpided to IN mlicolt saw IN come it/ly"trill IICI flu W*le NMI, fa nnuu M this 401, 11' Pour Pour, NW this scAlMll. lie 11tef pllaa art killed It tM flu If 11.11 W NO 1,111$1110, TIP Faility came* for 11' hour it III up Ji pn of service. to Cutribtim to Mtee a lepestlhot 11011 pgf"4 rnf"ats the urilis of the olicat'1 ulitbnN slility form" tut sill atrw to W 101. 21 Calulatim of Iauli sever wm is Dohol a to mlimi's Polar c~Joe. $me sepia Pill "rally M IrM/ol to u "Mi"st Older W j t*mUlllloutrul 11111 "to ""I", lot to Ill "Mpla, hoenhly DoPIoDo1N NIIO off altslatMis Iq of aurw Wolf Dour 01110, Ill IUIM f "110 In Wiled n IM rate of 11.11 Per Pull i.iN pll0. Ike facility (14"1 is 11.1: Poe 11 prs If service, to Catradim to Mona 11nsum tip, I me on roommu to Ponta of tM mlicM's 1ltieiated Piility forma that Pill Dotrw U IN 101, I 1 ~ 1 APPLICATION FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ASSISTANCE Company Names Addressi Telephone:( Contact Person: Title: Telephones Nature of Business Years in suxinesso ~r of Facilities Nationallys N of Facilities in TeXaaJ Type of Facilityi Nearest Similar. Facility, Are You Considering Other Locations sesides Denten7l Yes No If Yes, where Major Factors that will Influence your Decision: {I f PROPOSED FACILITY Location of Denton Site, I Site Acreages If no, at what stage s a Have You Acquired Site?: Yes No equisition7s r Square Footage of Facility, -Number of suildingss 1 Type of Construction, Estimated Value of construction, Anticipated Constrw:tion Starts Completions Anticipated opening Dates EXHIBIT. Z.._ ~ l I EMPLOYMENT 1 r x Initial Size of Labor Force: Anticipated Payrolls s (All employees) y Eventual Size of Labor Forces Anticipated Payrolls S (All employees) Typen of Employees: (production, etc.} Number of Employees to be Recruited from Denton: Payroll of Denton Recruits: s i i I' UTILITIES a i FacilitY's Hours of Operation (M - FIs ~ (Sat Electric: (sun + Anticipated Kilowatt Hours (KWR): (If available, submit actual con Ounspt on rom a ar facility) { Anticipated Demands (If not available, what will your • ectric system's design?) What Type of Pawer Equipment Will Your Facility Utilizes (Include 11Vl.C size, etc.) Water/Wastewater: Anticipated Water Consumption: gallons per (If available, submit actual consumpt on from similar ao ty) Peak avatar Consumption: gallons per hour i What porti,,.~n of your water consumption will be discharged as runoff (lawn spritAler system, etc.)?: gallons per Anticipates Fire Flow Requiresments?: Gallons Per Minute I 1 ; i {I Il 2 City of Denton city council minutes r April 3, 1990. 1 Page 3 A checklist had been provided of materials and information needed by staff. Staff would be reviewing the list for any changes that might be necessary such as eliminating some requirements. Mayor pro :em Ayer asked if the new 015 equipment might help with some of the needed information. Robbins replied yes after all the information were imputed. Council Member Gorton asked if a conflict came up between a ouilder and an inspector regarding a set of plans, was there one individual who would render a decision regarding the plans. i Robbins stated that the plans would have to be inspected according to the approved plans. Council Member Hopkins stated that she had a list of requirements that the City required thet no one else required. She asked that as the process was refined, could staff go to a meeting of the Builder's Association to explain the process. Mayor Stephens asked if a check had been made of other cities to see if they were streamlining their process, particularly Lewisville as they had just updated their system. Council Member McAdams stated that it would be better if the proreas took two weeks if it were right than for it to take four days and be wrong. Council Member Boyd stated that the rules needed to be understood by all and that they be applied uniformly and consistently. 1 5. The Council held a discussion regarding proposed changes in policy for candidate water/sewer lines. Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilitiea, reviewed the background information on the policy. The Land Use Planning Committee developed a concept of balanced growth - not only geographically but also between residential and industrial growth. The Public Utility Board devised a $500,000 a year I concept in which different areas would be looked at and that money would be available to help industrial customers or some type of development. Out of that process, a whole list of criteria and schedules were developed. It was felt that the guidelines became quite complicated and unworkable. The Public Utilities Board was suggesting the following policiess (1) during its annual review of the Utilityy Department's Capital Improvements Plan, the Board would consider the allocation of 500,000 for the construcL•ion of candidate water and/or sewer ines to serve only industrial prospects which had committed to OWN i 11 I I V I M l 4' 'r L V City of Denton city council Minutes d April 3, 1990 Page 4 building facilities in Dentin, (2) the City of Denton would : adopt a policy of responding' to growth rather than attempting to $lead' growth,. (3) all candidate water and sewer lines would be submitted to the Public Utilities Board to be considered on a case-by-case basis, (4) only those candidate water and sewer lines which would serve an industrial prospect which had committed to building facilities within the CIty of Denton, Texas, would be considered, (5) the Public Utilities Board would prescribe and obtain from each industrial prospect appropriate evidence of the prospect') commitment to building facilities within the CIty of Denton, texas, (6) upon review of such evidence of commitment, the Public Utilities Board might recommend to the Planning and Zoning Commission that funds be made availatle to provide water and/or sewer service to the prospect's facilities, (7) annual funding, through the Capital Improvements Plan, in the amount of $500,000 for the construction of candidate water and sewer lines would be h continued, but the cumulative total of such funding would not exceed $2 million at any time. These proposals had not yet blen to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Council Member Gorton asked about keeping some money for non-industrial purposes. Nelson replied that $150,000 would be placed in the Capital Improvements Plan for non-industrial purposes. 1 Council Member McAdams suggested that the wording t 'lead'/'follow' might not be.appeopriate. She felt that the intent was to be able to respond to a proposed development. It I was not proposed that sewer/water lines would be developed in advance, in anticipation of future development. The funding , ability was needed to be available so that when a prospect came along, negotiations could be done, i{ Mayor Pro Tom Ayer stated that he had reservations about the proposal as it proposed very substantial changes in policy. He was concerned about the change as he felt the concept of balanced/compact growth was a valuable one and should be j preserved, at was also concerned that this was a key part of I j the report of the Land Use Planning Task force which he did not want to see abandoned. f Nelson replied that the concept was still there. It was saying that the money was available but instead of trying to put it in 1 the ground where nothing existed and no commitments existed, it was making the money available. The Council then convened into the Regular Session at 7300 p.m. in the Council Chambers. 1 r ' a MINUTES - PLAN LINE - MAY 3I 1990 7=00 in Attendances Robert E. Nelson, p. E., Executive Director of Utilities C. David Ham, P.E., Director of Water/Wastewater Utilities Frank Robbins, Executive Director of Planning/Community Develop, Robert Thompson, Member, Public Utilities Board Mark Chew, Member, Public Utilities Board Jim Engel.brecht, Member, Planning and Zoning Commission Ivan Glasscock, ,Kember, Planning and Zoning Commission Frank Robbins opened the meeting by passing out handouts (1) of the City Development Guide pertaining to Utilities and (2) the Water and Sewer Lines Guidelines used for determining priorities of eligible candidates. Frank Robbins and Robert Nelson recapped the history line concept and how the guidelines had failed to ttracthnewabusiness into Denton. Several ideas were introduced by the Public Utilities Board memberst 3 a) The $500#000 (!230,000 for water/=250 000 for sewer) would be set aside each year for committed nd t caad a es only* b) Unencumbered funds would be allowed to grow to not more than a total of $2,000,000. c) These monies would be used to follow growth, not to lead E growth. f Robert Nelson also introduced an economic model to be used to evaluate the benefits of a committed industrial prospect. Payback of benefits to the City of Denton must exceed projected capital costs of construction over five years. The investment would be calculated as paybackof benefits accruing to this a) 25% of ad valorum tax on prospects' property b) 25% of sales tax an prospects' Denton sales G services c) 100% of construction sales tax d) Prospects' electric consumption payments contribution to return on investment - 3% " r s) Prospects' water consumption payments i contribution to return on investment - 8% EXHIBIT.._._... I , y f) Prospects' wastewater payments contribution to return on investment - 12% 9) Each of prospects' employees can be expected to generate two additional Denton employees ! h) 50% of prospects' employees and SOt of additional employees can be expected to reside in Denton 1) 25% sales tax of employees disposable income 1 j) disposable income equals 40% of total income k) candidates would be handled on a first come, first served basis. 1~I A general discussion followed in which there was no consensus of opinion. A follow up meeting was proposed when a firm agenda could be ' established and the staff could return with a proposed plan which could be written into an ordinance. Meeting adJourned at 8130 A.M. i , 2DH098-DOC F ~ s i E , k i, 1 r ~ M1..UIe3 r .nlrastrrcture Fi. aacict i:smittre +reesir.e Ttesaac. ,pair ;~i. tyYd W A.M. .ossittee ?leavers in Attendance: Ioan Tbcspson - Public Ltttities &L,atV 1 Mirk Cher - Publie ltilities &,am Jim Englebrecht - Plannint ind Zoning Commissiim Icon Glasscock - Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Members in Attendance: Bob Selson - Executh'e Director of L-tilities Frank Robbins - Executivob Director or Planning Dare Ham - Director, Wateri1astekster Ltilities Joseph lalentl - Administrative .Assistant, Waterr►astewster ~ Utilities 's r the meeting began with a review of the Economic Analysis model. At Bob Nelson's request, Joe Islentt walked the Committee members through the model, Jim Englebrecht asked about the origin of the vsrious i percentages that were used in the model to calcuiate tax revenue benefits. He also wanted to know how staff determined that SU% of any new pro.pect's espiovees would reside in Denton. He stated his concern that the public might also ask such questions and staff should be prepared to back up any percentages used in the model, t'rank Robuins , responded that staff might be able to document these percentapest however, whatever percentages were used, the same percentages would be applied each time an analvile ; i was done, John Thompson was concerned that a large industrial utility consumer much as Matsushita sight require expenditures for ! ! Denton's construction of additional utility capacity such as an expanded water plant. Bob Nelson admitted that was a possibility, but stated that it was not accounted for in the I j model. Such an expenditure would need special handling and ! approval. The Committee accepted the Funding polfoy, but suggesated changes to the Selection policy and the application process, Jim Englebrecht questioned thu definition of value-added goods as used in the Selection policy. Since no definition could be agreed upon, that term was replaced with one referring to goods previously manufactured elmewhore, but consumed in Denton. 1 F I . a r i Minutes Infrastructure Financing Committee Meeting Page 2 John Thompson wanted to know if service industries would be eligible for funding. The Committee agreed to include specific policy language permitting funding for corporate headquarters. Mr. Thompson also thought that the Infrastructure policy should be available not only to new local industries, but also to existing local industries that were expanding in Denton. M The Committee recommenced tnat the intermittment disbursement of Infrastructure funds be permitted as construction work on the subject utility lines progressed. i+ There was much discussion concerning the chronology of Boars I and Commission reviews and recommendations. Frank bobbins presented an alternative chronology in which the PUB f forwarded its recommendation to P 6 Z which, in turn, forwarded its recommendation and the Board's recommendation to the City Council. The Committee accepted this chronology. The Committee next considered the policy's suggested waiver of that provision of the Sub-Division ordinance requiring the construction of utility lines across the frontage of a prospect's property, John Thompson thought that the model should include the cost of this frontage infrastructure even if the requirement were waived. Dave Ham explained that the the financing of infrastructure to the edge of the prospect's property was an incentive for the prospect. To then require that the prospect spend its ol.n money to extend E utility lines across its frontage from their property edge would effectively remove that incentive, Mark Chew requested that the Committee meet again on July 20, 1990 at ?IOU A.M to review the poiley after the suggested changes had been made. f ~ i ! I III 1 ~MM /Al 1i i ~a t I EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD Y~~ i MINUTES July 23, 1990 7. REVIEW AND CONSIDER INF'P.%STRUCTURE FINANCING POLICY. i Nelson introduced this item and advised that John Thompson and Mark Chew were members of the task force that reviewed the policy and are trying to develop a new Infrastructure financing policy. Essentially the new policy providis that the Utility still return $500,000 each year to the program however, instead of doing an analysis, staff waits for a 1 potential customer to apply and then looks at various criteria. Three types of customers will be considered: 1) Industrial committed prospects, 2) industrial/retail ` I building in the city but selling outside the city, and 3) ' commercial retail operations manufacturing items sold in Denton. The staff will determine the feasibility of extending lines, the cost of the line, a five year payout on the line, cost va benefits, (25% of ad valorum tax base, 25% sales tax, etc.), revenues normally attributable to return j on Investment portion of our electric, water and wastewater, etc. If there is a positive net cash flow, then the project will be recommended. The applicant will do the work and the city pays after a f certificate of acceptance is Issued. The customer Is then directed to the Economic Development office and they present the positive issues about the city. Staff then begins to { work with the rest of the city organizations, i.e., Public Utilities Board, the Planning and Zoning Commission and after that, these two recommendations will be forwarded to the laity Council. Frad1f asked if any changes were made to the proposal by the ' Planning and Zoning Commission, would the Board be notified before the item was sent to the City Council. Nelson replied that any changes relating to the dollar amounts world require that the Board again review the item. Laney expressed a desire for the PAZ to look at traffic patterns, etc., before final approval of these projects. After general discussion, LaForte made a motion to recommend to the City Council acceptance of the policy as presented, Second by Chew. All ayes, no nays, motion carried. i 1 EXHIBIT.., I 1 t i i I CITY HT: COUNCIL E i i ' J E o c s 4d i i i s I t August 21, 1990 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM i TOi MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM; Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager REi CONSIDER APPROVAL OF REQUEST BY FOREST HILL NO. 2 WATER SUPPLY CORP., TO RECEIVE CERTIFICATE OF CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY (CCN) FOR WATER SERVICE TO 34 CUSTOMERS LOCATED ON 50 1 JURISDICTION (ETJ) ACRES NORTHEAST OF N THE , CITYXTitATERRITORIAL J RECOMMENDATION The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of July ^.3, 1990, recommended to the City Council that the City not oppose dual certification provided certain construction standards are followed on all future construction and that dual certification is limited to the prescribed area. SUMMARY Forest Hill No. 2 Water Supply Corp presently serves water to 34 residential water customers located on 50 acres of property in Denton's ETJ northeast of the City and south of Hartlee Field Road and Airport. Forest Hill has served this area since its beginnings several years ago but had not previously secured a CCN as required by State law. They are now seeking a CCN due to requirements of lending _ institutions, f j The Denton Utility system is not presently serving in the area, but is located approximately one mile south at McNair Elementary School. The City agreed to a dual certification ago w end development several Ysera with the Oak B Is located between the McNair School and Forest Hill area. Ile- W- i g Forest Hill No. 2 Water Supply Corp. Page 2 1 The Staff recommends that the City not oppose the dual certification provided Forest Hill No. 2 Water Supply Corp., constructs all future additions to their system to the same standards as the City. This will assure a good system that in the area other into t the City. will tuture a anncostly exation burden of d this to event of f i 1 FISCAL SUMMARY Not applicable Respect lly submitted, 1 Lloyd V. Harrell, C y Manager Pr Eared/Ap roved byi R. Nelson, Executive Director Department of Utilities Exhibit I Notice of Application II Location Map III Minutes of PUB Meeting of 7/23/90 i it { { i F ~ i 1 1 j NOTICE OF AN APPLICATION FILED WITH THE TEXAS WATER COMMISSION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY TO PROVIDE WATER UTILITY SERVICE 18 July 90 Mr.. Robert E. Nelson Executive Director of Utilities CITY OF DENTON 215 East McKinney Denton, TX 76201 I FOREST HILL NO. TWO WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION has filed an application for m Certificate of Convenience and Necessity with the Texas Water Commission to provide water utility service in Denton County. The proposed service area is approximately 3 1./2 miles northeast of downtown Denton, Texas, and generally bounded on the north by rlartlee Field Road, on the south by Oak Bend Subdivision and on the east and west sides by certain tracts of land; the subdivision is generally divided down the middle by Oolden Circle street. The total area being requested includes approximately 50 acres and 34 customers. Persons who wish to intervene or comment should write the: RateR Section, Water Utilities Division, TEXAS WATER COMMISSION, P.O. Box 13087, Capitol Station, Austin, Texas 78711-3087 within thirty (30) days from the date of this publication or notice. No I public hearing will be held unless a request for hearing is F received. Only those individuals who submit a written request to be notified of a hearing schedule will receive notice if a hearing is scheduled. s r EXHIBIT_____ j ti 1 j Mr. Robert E. Nelson Executive Director of Utilities CITY OF DENTON 216 East McKinney Denton, TX 76201 Date: Rates Section i Plater Utility Division TFXAS WATER COMMISSION P.O. Box 13067, Capitol station Austin, TX 76711-3067 THE TEXAS WATER R8: APPLBygiDRBSTIHILLWNo. TWO WATER SUPPLYCCOMMISSION ORPORATION R A CCN 1 This is to inform the Texas Water Commission that atthee meeting on the _ day of _ 1990 agreed to dually certify certain areas within its current water utility j service area. i k The service area affectod is the entire Forest Hill No. Two djs ubdivisi n and tiaioe eDentonrCounty~, Texaaly adjacent to and south of the Thank you very such. Date For City of Denton G cc: Texas Water Company Route 6, Box 139-A Denton, TX 76201 i k E F r l R~ QI k r I r" I s t 4 J 1~ ~ ~ cm uwn ~ 00 <1r0omEST I~ 3NM b 71N iy! ~i iI V... 47f ~v`y •le wIR1 1.7 f ".w II Rot RR tll M M0IIOw1 Ip1lO Y ~~I f ~ 1 cloy ~ ~ m K ` er[ 7` F 'fQ ■~~aM y 1 4 I ,r-Mn" MMnF1 pp a4r~1 , YIM2^.w A e a l~dl!!4 i r n1►1 '..■alalr r ~ ~ ~ Q ..~In 1 1 i MI"R, it, ON "10 . _ ,may 'Jim y 1Q,;A0wr f`I T as ~ ~ M ~ ff7 IN e..rlls ~ • ! a ff l 310 '~■'4R Iw • IrLJL.- ww,w nIR1 37? AM 9 ~a~ 1 rr r • I lag 1w 0 J ■ ~ { a 190 t v I So~ 1 EXHIBfT 1 L ICI 1 r FUBLLC UTILITIES BOARD r { OTHER ACTION BY THE BOARD 7/23/90 #9 CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A REQUEST BY FOREST RILL NO. 2 WATER SUPPLY CORP., TO RECEIVE CERTIFICATE OF CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY FOR WATER SERVICE TO 34 CUSTOMERS LOCATED ON 50 ACRES IN DENTON'S EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION NORTHEAST OF THE CITY. Nelson introduced this item advising that Forest Hill No. 2 Water Supply Corporation cannot obtain lending unless dual certification is received in their water service area. Thompson asked how close Denton's water system is to this area. Martin advised that we have a line at Hodge Elementary School, but there is considerable distance from that location to this one. After general discussion, Laney made a motion to recommend + approval of subject request providing all building construction is done to comply with City of Denton building codes. Second by LaForts. All ayes, no nays, motion carried. ti i 1 I r`p4 i' r DRAFT Pi8 Minutes F August so 1990 Page 4 Iv. Consider policy relating to the city extension of city water and wastewater lines to economic development candidates. Mr, Robbins narrated the history of the policy saying that when the Denton Development Plan (DDP) was adopted there was an economic growth incentive policy that provided for utility extension at city cost. The ranking criteria for these "candidate" lines was found to be problematic, indicating lines in parts of the City where economic growth was already sufficient. Also, the policy set aside money to help 'hot prospects" for six months of the year. If the money was not t spent in six months, it was to be used for a candidate line. P candidate lines are for areas where the City might want to have lines in the future. Therefore, if a hot prospect appeared after the six month period, the City would be unable to provide economic incentive. Also, extending lines to vacant land where there is no interest would create a rate increase, The Public Utilities Board (PUB) -her. recommended only extending lines to hot prospects. A new rat of criteria : / is included with the new policy. Mr. Glasscock and Mr. g Ij Bngalbrecht have been on the committee working on this new s policy. The policy is that during its annual review of the Utility [apartment's Capital Improvements Plan (CIP), the PUP shall consider the allocation of up to $500,000 annually to j finance the construction of infrastructure water and/or savor lines. This allocation shall consist of $950,000 from the Water CIP and $750,000 from the wastewater CIP. Infrastructure financing shall be provided only toi 1) industrial pprospects which have covaittod to building facilities in Denton 7) commercial/istall prospects which have committed to building facilities in Denton and whieht I a) sell a majority of their goods or services to ~ individuals or businesses outside of Denton,■ a74/or b) manufacture goods for consumption in Denton which were previously manufactured outside of Denton I) Corrppoorate headquarters prospects which have committed to buildinq foOlitiss in Denton. For purposes of the economic analysisi Project costs shall consist of 1001 ots ' L J • debt service associated with the subject utility line's construction, and A return on investment associated with the completed subject utility line. 1 Project benefits shall consist of 751 oti • revenue from ad valorem tax on prospect's local property, plant, and equipment • revenue from sales tax on prospect's products and serviose sold byy the Denton feoility • revenue from sake tax on local purchases by the Denton- resident labor force Sanerated by prospect's locating in Denton and 1001 oti i 1 I 7r 10M Pig minutes ' August a, 1990 DRAFT Page 5 + revenue from sales tax on prospect's local purchase of its facility's construction materials e. + revenue from that portion of the prospect's local consumption of Denton utilities that is contributed toward the return on investment. No. Brock asked what will be the return on the City's investment. Mr, Robbins replied that the Utility Department pays into the general fund an amount equal to 6% of the capital cost of the investment. When a line is built, 6b of the cost goes to the general fund. This is dons in lieu of tees or taxes. No. Brock asked how the 151 figt:re was determined. Mr. Robbins answered that it is an average that relates to kinds of services. the cost is actually a little loss than l what they are paying. 151 is a general nuaber that will keep ` things simple, Mr. Engelbrecht noted that the committee working on the policy i asked the PUB to monitor the numbers and try to enhance them over time. 1 Mr, Robbins continued that funds shall be disbursed to the prospect or the prospect's designee only as tollowsf 1) upon presentation of a Certificate of Occupancy for the prospect's Denton facility, or 1) in intermittent payments as construction of the subject utility line progrosses. The Commission revievol the proposed policy and related formulas. No. Brock commented that one Council member was concerned about balanced growth, if a request for a line was made in an area that would distort growth patterns, would the Commission be able to recommend that no City-funded extensions be made? Mr. Robbins sold yam, The request could be denied on a policy basis or in conjunction with a toning case. Me, Brock asked what it the sits was zoned properly and the City just did not want to um* City funds? Mr, Bngelbtecht explained that the proposed policy addresses the eoonomic aspects of extension, not land use. The process for approving extensions will be that Pus will make a tt reooawndation to the Planning and Zoning Commission which i will in turn make a recommendation to the City Counci;. The f J Commission would look at the policy and then apply it in terms of the DDP. The PUB recommendation will be based on economic viability. Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of the policy relating to the city extension of city water and wastewater lines to economic development candidates, 6eoonded by Nr. Bngelbrecht and unanimously carried (6-0). { i I +~r rr I I k At c° CITY COUNCIL 1 r or o, 44 hA Q L s a I j J 1 1 F r how CITY of DENTON / 215 E. McKinney l Denton, Texas 76201 MEMORANDUM 3 DATE: August 17, 1990 is A TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance SUBJECT: JULY BUDGET RECAP ' 1 ~k It seems as though lately all the attention Is focused on the 1990-91 budget, However, the current year budget ;s now over 10 months old and there is not much change from that which was reported in our comprehensive 9 months report. There is still concern over sales tax receipts. 4he wgnth of July showed receipts of $585,913.00 which did not increase over last years amount of $587,345.00 but decreased by $1,428,00. 1 } Although other areas of the budget have offset some of this r, loss, there is still concern in the same type of areas as i reported in the past, especially in the building areas. Total S revenues through July were $24,101,387.00 which is 901 of the budget. This compares to $22,234,233.00 for the same period ; last year. The expenditure side of the general fund is under budget at 791 with expenses and encumbrances incurred through the end of July. If this pace keeps up, the general fund as was reported in the 9 month report should come well under budget, which should help offset some of the decrease in revenues. If you have any questions or need any further information, please advise. 4 y , ~ t 5 J hn F. McGrane r FMc,G/ljh . } S3S4F k ~ h1•iL~ x yyIJ1: Tf Y i ( 1 s~ '.;4 r FILE 4% 11