HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-18-1990
y .
na
a
AGENDA
i CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
September 18, 1990
i
Nock Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
September 18, 1950, at 5:15 pin. In the Civil Defense Reom of
City hall, 215 H. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the
following items will be considered:
I t
Note: Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may
also be considnred as part of the Agenda for the
Regular Meeti-«.
5:15 p.m.
1. Executive Session:
j A. Legal Matters Under Sec, 2(e), Act. 5252-17
V.A.T.S.
1
1. Consider action in bounty ve, City.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
C. Patsonnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Act 6252-17 V.A.T.S. E
1. Consider appointments to the Zoning Task
Force.
` 1. Consider appointments to the Public
/ utilities Board and the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
I (
2, Hold a discussion concecning the bridge over the
cailroad tracks on Loop 281. and the future widening of
i` the Loop.
I 3. Hold a discussion regar-ling the Denton Central
Appraisal District (DCAD) 1990-91 Budget as submitted
to the City for consideration.
4. Dl.scuss and give staff direction concerning the
opening of City Council meetings.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,,
r September 18, 1990, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of
City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the
I following items will he considered:
j 7:00 P.M.
`I
Consider approval of the minutes of the regular
meeting of July 10, 1990.
1
1
vp~
y
1 k.
9~S
AGENDA
{ CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
r September 19, 1990
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
September 18, 1990, at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of
City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the
following items will be considered:
Note: Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may
also be considered as part of the Agenda for the
Regular Meeting.
5:15 P.M.
1. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 i
V.A.T.S.
Ih 1. Consider action in county-im CLty.
8. Real Estate Under Sec, 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
1. Consider appointments to the Zoning Talk
Force. 1
2. Consider appointments to the Public
Utilities Board and the Planning and Zoning
commission.
2. Hold a discussion concerning the bridge over the
railroad tracks on Loop 288 and the future widening of
the Loop.
3. Hold a discussion regarding the Denton Central
Appraisal District (DCAD) 1990-91 Budget as submitted
to the City for consideration. x
4. Discuss and give staff direction concerning the
opening of City Council meetings.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
September 18, 1990, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of ;K
City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the
following items will be considered:
y
7:OO p.m.
1. Consider approval of the minutes of the regular
I meeting of. July 10, 1990.
.
i
lop"
t City of Denton City Council Agenda
September 16, 1990
Page 2
M Receive a citizen report from Katt Soltis regarding
2
the Loop 298 railroad overpass.
}
3• Receiv88a racitizen repor ilroad ove Qass from Bob Z41zell regarding the
288
Loop
y{I
presentation of Yard of the 14onth Awards.
4.
S, Consent Agenda
A. Bide and purchases
1, Bid 01139 - Pape[ (Office & xorographio)
2• Bid 01141 - Printout paper
3, Bid 01142 - Portable Cellular TelemetrY
Equipment
4, Bid 01144 - Janitorial Services ,
5, Bid 01145 - install insulation and Lagging
6, Bid 01146 - Asbestos Removal
I ~
6, ordinances
an onance A, Consider bidso and fprovidingdtot the awardiof competitive
contracts for the purchase of mateti&10.
- Bid
equipment, supplies or services. (5.A.1.
011390 5.A2• - Bid 01141, 5-A.3. - Bid 01142,
aid 01144, 5.A-5. Bid 01145, S.A•6. -
Bid 01146)
Of an ordinance amending
B. Consider adoption
Article V (Building M
Section 5-175 of Chapter 5,
code) of the Code of Ordinance Of the City Of
Denton [elating to fencing iding fogate requirements
r a penalty in
tot swimming pools; providing tot
maximum amount of verab tclanesciand
thereof: Pro(Orclause. (The Building Code
providing repealing
Board recommends approval.) t'.
the
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance adopting the
budget for the City otDeOncLO4srTeiae,1990; and
fiscal year beginning on
ending on September 30, 1991.
I
S7■■7_ b
City of Denton City Council Agenda
September 18, 1990
Page 3
h
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance levying the ad
j valorem tax of the City of Denton, Texas, for the
1990, on all taxable property within the
corporate limits of the City on January 1, 1990,
C not exempt by law; providing revenues for payment
of current municipal expenses, and for interest
and sinking fund on outstanding City of Denton
! bonds; providing for limited exemptions of
certain homesteads; providing for enforcement of
collections; and providing for a soverability
clause.
9. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending the j
schedule of rates for water service. (Public
Utilities Board recommends approval.)
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending the
schedule of rates for sewer service. (Put,Iic
Utilities Board recommends approval.)
0. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing
rates for residential and commercial sanitation 1
collection services as authorized by Chapter 12 i
of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton. j
(Public Utilities Board recommends approval.)
H. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing
rates tot the use of the City's Sanitary Landfill
site as authorised by Chapter 12 of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton, (Public
Utilities Board recommends approval,)
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of
Denton, Texas, prohibiting the parking of
vehicles on the south side of West Oak Street, $
from its intersection with Penton Street to a
point 77 feet east of the east right-of-way line
of Denton Street, for a distance of 77 feet. l
(Citizen Traffic Safety Support commission 1
recommends approval.)
J. Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of
Denton, Texas, prohibiting the parking of
vehicles on both sides of U.S. Highway 380 East,
from Riverside Drive to Rock 11111 road. (Citizon
Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends
approval.) 111
r I
1
I
a
F
City of Denton City Council Agenda
r September 18, 1990
Page 4
7. Resolutions
A. Consider approval of a resolution approving
year-end budget adjustments for FY 1989-90.
B. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
City Manager to execute an agreement between the
City of Denton, Texas, and the Department of the
Army, Corps of Engineers establishing procedures
f, for hydropower operations at LewlFVille Dam.
Fare 3940 (Public Utilities Board recommends
j 1 approval.)
I 1
C. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
city manager to execute an agreement between the
i City of Denton, Texas, and the Department of the
Army, Corps of Engineers, establishing procedures
for hydropower oparattin at Lake Ray Roberts
Dam. Fero #3939 (FUblic Utilities Board
recommends approval.)
D. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing to
City Manager to execute documents for the
Management Grant Application and Agreement.
E, Consider approval of a resolution to disapprove
the Denton Central Appraisal District (DCAD)
1990-91 Budget as provided for by see. 6.06 Of k
the Texas Property Tax Code.
a discussion and give staff appropriate direction
8. Hold
concerning the future widening of Loop 288 and the
railroad overpass
9. Consider a notion to approve in principle an agreement
with the Greater Denton Arts Council regarding the old
Campus Theater and direct the City Attorney to draft a
formal contract.
10, miscellaneous natters from the city Manager.
it. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel j
D. Board Appointments
12. New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to a
suggest items for future agendas.
i `
I
war
10ltj 0C N ht0h City Council Agenda
! September 18. 1990
{ i Page 5
}
13, Executive Session;
t
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
4
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2{fAtt. 6252-17
V. A. T. S.
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Act 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
i
1
{
NOTE: TI[E CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THI; RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO
EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT
IS LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE.
I
' C E R T I F 1 C A T E
I
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the {
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of 1990 At _ o'clock i
(a.m.) (p.m..) s
~ r
' CITY SECR"ARY
3294C
1
i ~
Ir r
f
Id 4i
i
OW~
i
s
IMP+
T x:
IMI
t 1
1
CITY
COUNCI
a
r
44
for a~
4 h
0
~ s
i i
e `
GG
J
,i
E
"i
CNY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL F, , DINO / DENTON, TEXAS 78201 /TELEPHONE (817) 600.0907 1
Office of fho City Mantoof
A
M E M O R A N D U M
i I
TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
FROM: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager F
Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering/Transportation
a
DATE: September 13, 1990
SUBJECT: Railroad Overpass on Loop 298
i
3
1
Since we last met with the Council on this subject, we have had
a number of meetings and discussions. Those included a joint
meeting between DART, Union Pacific Railroad and City staff
members concerning Union Pacific eight-of-way options, staff
also attended a presentation by the private railroad
(Tarantula) which coveted methods tot short haul frai ht
operations, excursion train operations, and thoughts on using
the Union Pacific line. Staff has participated in forums
coveting all facets of the issue with the Economic Development
Committs" of the Chamber of Commerce. Mote detailed
discussions occurred with representatives from the Chamber
Transportation Committee and railroad enthusiasts at the
Chamber. We have also had discussions and phone conversations i
with several members of the Highway Department, DAFT officials
and other interested parties. One major point has been
clarified through the meetings. The method and vertical
alignment of the crossing ace the real issue versus abandonment ?
of railroad right-of-way.
Through these discussions, presentations ant written '
correspondence, we have found the following information:
1. CucrontlV, the Union Pacific does not use the track
in question for any kind of freight operations, and
the sta:f, as well as the railroad, do not see any
future coecations tot the track in the near future. r
Our best available information shows that this t
section has not been used for more than ten years. a
i
2. Because of these facts, the Union Pacific has
indicated that they will, in all likelihood, attempt 1
to abandon the track in the near future using proper !
NO procedures. This process takes about one year.
I
gum
~YI M` LIIi.Va 1
Rs■[■ 1
I
Fi
Y
a
Hallcoad Overpass on Loop 288
September 13, 1990
Page 2
3. If the raklroad decides to abandon the track, they
have agreed to advise the City in advance so that we
can pursue preserving the right-of-way through the
Rails-to-lcails program or other progcans it the r~
City desires.
4. DART doeu not have any plans to extend DART rail
service to the city of Denton toe at least the next
20 years.
5. COO's plan does not forecast a need for tail ;i
transportation to the City of Denton for the next 20
years, Indeed their cocommendatione are for HOV
(High Occupancy Vehicle) lanes to be implemented on
the freeway.
b. The Chamber of Commerce Economic Development
Committee recommended that the Highway Department's
request be granted. Other groups, including the I
Central Business Distcict Committee and the ad hoc +
study group, are willing to support at-grade
crossing as long as some provision can be made to
allow the tracks to facilitate some future rail
activity if it occurs in the future.
7. The Highway Department would like to abandon the
overpass it there ace no rail operations and has
elected to pursue the final answer with the Union
Pacific (see attached letter). Therefore, theca is
not the same sense of urgency as there was six weeks
ago. j
{ S. An at-grade crossing for this same union Pacific
track is being built in Lewisville on Highway 121.
c3lven all of the above facts, the staff would propose to delete
the overpass and pursue an at-grade ccossing. As mentioned
f before, this would solve several safety pcoblems in the mall
sees. Given the fact that there is no activity now and none In
the foreseeable future, we do 'not think an at-grade crossing j
would prohibit or change any traffic movements In the area. t J
This solution would allow us to maintain options for the futuce 1i
should some sort of private entity want to use the tracks. Our i
meetings and discussions with Union Pacific indicate they are
willing to advise us before proceeding with abandonment of the
tracks. If that occurs, we would be able to look at obtaining
the railroad right-of-way for future use under a
Rails-to-Trails concept or to reserve it for some kind of
private activity. We would suggest recommending to the Highway
Department Lhat +hey proceed with a design without the
overpass. The City may need to fund the aLtomatic signals tot
the at-grade crossing in the ..tute it some sort of operation
began.
a
-MAM
w,ra,~ I
n
J'f
vallcoad Overpass on Loop 188 ,
September 13, 1990
Page 3
t
We think the at-grade option gives the Highway Depactment the
best solution including an indication for eight-of-way
considerations. This method still reserves options tot some
kind of future tail transportation it activityy ever occurs.
FIn+:lly, pedestrian access is still available if that were a 1
future need of the City since the crossing could be
economically built over or under Loop ?88,
Therefore, staff recommends the City advise the state Highway
Department that It has no objections to the removal of the Loop
w 286 overpass provided the following conditions are met:
1. The current railroad tracks be left in place and an
at-grade crossing be Included;
2. Should the City require a separated pedestrian/bike
crossing at this location, such will be permitted by f
the State; and It
3. Should some type of tail and/or mass transit system
desire to construct a separated crossing at some {
time in the future, such would be permitted by the
Highway Department.
It you or the Council have any further questions, please feel
fees to call as at your convenience.
j ~
H ck vehla r y Clat +
Deputy city manager i clot o Engineering
and Tt nspoctation
Mcb JJ
5089 I
Attachment
1
1
.i
' ~ I
WARM
AA A9lWY
t wrtiy
a ?2-
i SEP i i 1990
COMMISSION STATE DEPARTMENT Of HIGHWAYS ENGINEER DIRECTOR
ROBERT M, DIDMAN, CHAIRMAN AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ARNOLO w, OLIVE R, rt. r
MY STOKER. JR. 00. sox "A}
WAYNE S DUOOLtt TEN 04LLAS. TLKAS/EAI.3%! ,
(114111610 V1
Controls 2250-01-012 September 10, 1990
Loop 288: :From U.S. 360 South
To Near S.H. 35E CONTACT:
vsat Denton County
Mr. Rick Svehla
Deputy City Manager
City of Denton
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear RickE
1
Reference is made to your letter of Septmeber 61 1990 concerning the
Loop 268 crossing of Union Pacific tracks.
Attached are copies of letters generated by oar Department requesting
advice from the Union Pacific Railroad Company about their plans for
j this se..tion of their railroad facility. To data we have not received a I
i responae.
Our Department is in the process of rialuating our current 10-Year
Project. Development Plan based on an average $1.4 billion dollar
contract letting volume statewide for the next five years. This letting
volume is much lower than had been anticipated, and each District has
been requested to evaluate their Project Development Plan Projects
authorized for Level III development (plans, specifications and estimate
and right of way acquisition) on the basis of annLA1 construction
contract )etting volume allocations for the next five years. We are in
the process of performing this evaluation, and all consultant contract
procedures that have not progressed to the negotiation stage are being
held in abeyance pending the outcone of this evaluation process which
will of course determine the projects that could be placed under
construction contract within the next five years based on funds that
could be allocated to each District.
In summary, District! 16 will mx need to make a decision about the need
for a h ighway-ra I 4oad grade separation on Loop 288 until this
evaluation is completed and State Headquarters has reviewed and approved
;he proposed project letting plan for implementation. We anticipate
this process will require at least 30 to 60 days. Authority to proceed
with negotiations with a consulting engineering firm could be granted at
that time if the Loop 288 project is selected for inclusion in the
II~ 5-Year Letting Plan, and scoping of the work with the consultant should
of course be based on a grade separation if requited or without one if
not required.
,i ..-.7
~y.
Pl..a. v.
r Mr. Rick Svehla
SeptemtAr 10, 2990
Page 2
We would of course at that time need to know the position of the
Railroad Company and the City of Denton if they anticipate usage of the
trackage for other railway oriented purposes, in the event we are
authorized to proce)d further with consultant contract negotiations.
Please advise if we may be of further assistance.
Sincerely#
P~f►N~ U~ ~D~iGRANV
ohn Y. Blain, Jr., P.E.v i
District Design Engineer
Attachment
I
i
a
1
I
1
I
I
f
MMORANDUM
i
TO: File D-5 Date: July 2, 1990
FAOMI Mr. John V. Blain, Jr., P.E. Originetia4 Office
SUBJECT: Control: 2250-01-012 District 20
Wdo Loop 288: From: U.S. 380 southward
To: I.H. 35E r
Denton District
Listed in the PDP is a project proposal to widen existing $
Loop 288 to a 4-Lane divided urban facility.
As previously discussed in a telephone conversation between
Mr. Allen Steve$ and Mr. John Blain: a hi4hway grade
separation paration structure is in place on the existinq two-lane
highway, (see attached map) and the railroad tracks which pass
un erneath the structure are appparently not being used at this
t time. We would like to know planning purposes if these
rail lines wi:l become operative in the future and If a grade
separation should be provided for in the proposed reconstruc-
tion of the highway.
r'
It you have anyy
Debner at (214)320 questions or comments, please contact John
4, .
S
r n Blain r., .
strict Design Engineer
Attachment
R JVB:jd ,
copy toe Sturdivent, Debner, C-BE
6
f
J
=EV COMMISSION STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYSTOR
ROBERT HOEDMAN, CHAIRMAN AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION [II, ►f as. 71AY D[M1TT C. CALEII STATt FDGHN'A1 BERG, AAYNE e. DUDOti1STEN 111"A SUM
AVftn• rtxm 1BN1-wu
0111 M1AfU
a
July 9, 1990
CONTACT:
D-5RR
Denton County
CSJ 2250-01.012
Project CRP ( )M
Loop 288t At MKT RR Overpass
DOT No. 414684V
Mr, Larry Lums {
Mgr. Industry L Public Projects
Union Pacific Railroad Company
506 W. Chestnut
Denison, Texas 75020
Dear Sim
As planning proceeds for proposed reconstruction of Loop 268 at the subject
location (see attached skstc% it his been observed that the tracks are
apparently not in in,
Please advise if these rail lines will becm operative in the future and if e
grade separation structure should be provided.
j Your continued cooperation is greatly appreciated,
I Sincerely$
Orlo,nal.. i.In~e
Luis Ybane=1 P.E.
Bridge Engineer
FFtgb
Attach,
ect Mr, C. Showaker if Vbt, Eoir, Action {
beet Dellis District (04st. 16) L Dist. Ensr.~....- Advise t '
Highway Dail in 0lwisi0n (0-8) Ccmment i
Wesley 0, Pa r, P.E. Const, Engr•
an. Ertar. Prep Ans. t
Adm. Enar. .r._ P,o'e•rtn. i
Melnt. Engr. - - See 0. E. I
R.O.W. Enar. -
Tramp. En r.
FILE
i
ICU
I1r k
I
'IT= LT
CITY
COUNCIL;
r
I
0
G
i
I
1
,
/5,*4
~ I
WTY 01 WNTON, TRUE 215E. MCKINNEYI DENTON, TEXAS 7e2O1 I TELEPHONE (817) 50"M
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 14, 1990
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
FROM: John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance
SUBJECT: DISAPPROVAL OF DCkD BUDGET
i
Pursuant to Council's request to discuss and consider
disapproval of the Denton Central Appraisal District (DCAD) 1991
Budget, attached is said budget for Council's further review.
Also attached is a resolution recently passed by the
Commissioners Court that formally expresses the County's
disc proval. If Council desires to take similar action, a
' resolution has been prepared for the September 18th regular '
meeting. Any action to disapprove must be taken by October S,
w 1990 (pursuant to Sec. 6,06 of the State Property Tax Code
gY also attached for your review).
In order for the DCAD 1991 Budget not to take effect a simple
E` majority of taxing units entitled to vote on appointment of
i board members must adopt resolutions to disapprove. In our case, ?
this means that at least 19 of the 37 entitled taxing units must
take action to disapprove and file such by October S, 1990,
Staff hAs cen3ucted a telephone survey of some entitled
jurisdictions. Results of this survey are attached for your
revIOd.
Ploase advise if I can provide further Information.
JFMCG:af
Attachments
S41SF
s
1
1
l
or
SURVEY OF SELECTED DENTON COUNTY TAXING UNITS
POSITION REGARDING 1991 DCAD BUDGET
13-Se -90 UedxidedJ
Non" Acdoo Taken Not vv(
7bxio unit to Dian vo ro ►ro Diotmaed',
Denton County XX
City of Argyle XX
City of Aubrey XX
j
City of Corinth XX
City of Flower Mound XX
i
City of Krum XX
City of Lewisville Xx
city or Pilot Point XX f
city of Roanoke
2
City of Sanger
Argyle ISD XX
Denton 1SD XX
Lewisville ISD XX
Northwest ISD xx
I
r
r
:
i
BUODY
COPYLERWALKIER
i (Ot r) 50245M
PRECINCT3
SANDYJACOOS e114464-1110
PRECINCTa 1~t+~'I S trrlel'
(214) 136-3721 DON HILL
F% 'I
PRECINCT 4
DENTON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT
IAC 111IRGESS, JUDGE
(&1 296
COU111"ON0E ON THE OWME 110W.HICKORY OWTON,1tG0111251
PtT)70M1Naelg7►1t1N {
S
i
i
September 10, 1990
Denton Centred Appraitwl Mario
Board of Dlrecton
Richard SrNth, Secretary
3911 Mono Street
Y.O. Box 2816
Benton, Tuxus 76702.2816
Dear Mr. Smith,
On Monday, September 10,1990 the Denton County Commisalonen Court adopted the endosod
raolutkm regarding the 1991 Denton Central Appraised Dleltrict Budget
'ITeunda he Denton County Curnmi udonen Coun voted to dUapprove the 1991 budget adopted on
y, September 6, 1W by the Denton COMM Appralaal Dibtrict, pursuant to Artlrle 6,06 of the
71ex Code,
If you have any 9u" , PIWO call my OMCe at 817.3W0298. Tltardt you.
Slncml
I ,ds'
Vic Burgess
County judge
CC-Isb
co CommWIonen Court
James Wells, Auditor
Donna Stewart, Budget Otticer
RWRIV80 BY:
' COPY TrJ ~aMM1.SSra AS
DATE: - '
DATA
TTIIS:
s
1 I
F 1
I,
I
i
cti. w.
ti` +
r
f
RESOLUTION IN RE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE
DENTON CENTRAL THE DENTON COUNTY
APPRAISAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS COURT
1991 DUOGET DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS
September 10, 1990
The Commissioners Court .o97:.0enton County, .Texas meeting in
~aa requLar session the 10th day.'a Septesber, 1990, arann other
procaadinrs considered 4-ta following' rasoLution:
WHEREAS, the .1991• budget ado,ited 'by tha Denton Central
appraisal District on,'Thursdaye.'Beptambsr 6r 1990,providas for a
9.a j increuua over the prsvioua,,y,epr!-s'-bud,getI,and
WHEREAS, the Denton C6unty'60Aan3r9ioners Court; believes that
in theso difficult economic times- such,an''incroase would put an
undue burden upon the taxpayersj,,
NOW THEREFORE, .BE IT. RESOLVED, 'BY:'„TH DENTON COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS COURT$ thus pursuant, to Article .2-of , the 'fax Code,
the 1991 budget adopted on Thureday,:Sapton"r 60' 1990 by the
Denton Central Appraisal District,is disapproved.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERE6, that the Aida to the Court file a
certified copy of this resolution with the,Secretury of the Board
of Directors for the Donton Central Appraisal Oletriot immodistsly,
DONE IN OPEN COURT, this 10th day of September, 19900 upon
motion by Commissioner nuddy Col , seconded by
Coimsissioner Sandy nTLb , and 4 mambers of the
f Court being present and vo ng 'ayu".
` V C BWiGESS, COUNT JUDGE.
f1,~~111
BUDDY COLE, 99KMISSIONER SANDY JACOBS COMMISSIONER
Precinct 1 Preoin t 2
i
LEE WALKEH, COMMVSIONER DON If Le COMMISSIONER
Precinct
racino
ATTESTi
MARILYN ROSINSON, County Clerk
and Rx-Officio Clerk of the
Compesioners Court of 4,. '
~rf exas
D Kt count
I
1p
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
r
7911 MORSE STREET
P.O. sox x111
DENTON, TEXAS 76202•2119
111.519.0901
JOE D. R00ERS, CTAiAPk%TA EOARD OF DIRECTORS:
JON GEM Chairmen
Chief ApprWW JOHN 0 S OWN R/A CLARENCE MYNAS, Vale-ChIk"M
Deputy Chief APP4W RICHARD SMITH, Se Mvq
TROY YAM
JOE A. FORSYTHE 1 ;1 14
0RAC IE ROCK
Deputy Chid ApprNeer•AdmlNetnmon
r ~
TOs All Taxing Jurisdictions
{
FROHs Joe Rogers, Chief Appraiser
I
DATEr August 27, 1990 ;
SUBJECTS 1991 DCAD Budget
Budget reductions initiated by Board of Director's budget workshop at
the August 23, 1990 board meeting,
~I }
1, Salary increases have been reduced to a 3% maximum based on
merit.
2, Budget !tens related to salaries were correspondingly reduced,
3, Several other budget !tells were also reduced to minimum service.
Denton C,A.D, must %maintain 100% of market value, equalisation on all
property according to its value, and the research necessary to know
the market plats. This to required by state law and according to she
state reports we have performed at the 1002 level for the put two
years, and at Sgt the year before,
The budget is now at the bare minimum to continue this lavsl of
service, We hope that you realtae that the appraisal Jistriet must
compete with the Dallas and Fort worth areas just as your
jurisdiction must compete with the Dallas and Fort Worth areas, we
become a employee training ground just as you do for the Dallas and
Fort worth areas.
Even the 32 eaximus, salary increase based on aarit will not cover
for some of our employees the lnereaaa in dependent insurance
coverage,
i
j
i
I Il
I
i
all I
OA
Wa
1
r
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
3011 MORSE STRECT
RO BOX 2616
DENTON, TEXAS 76202.2616
117-366-0001
JOE D. ROGERS. CTAIRPA+RTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS:
Chlel A raiser
DD JON BECK, Chairmen
JOHN D. BROWN, RPA CURENCE MYERS, Vloo-Chalrmgn
Deputy Chief AppWw MK tery
JOE A. FORSYTHE TRROOYARWHI E 8acn
Deputy CW Apprel.er-Admin!alsson HORACE BROCK
i
M F. M 0
E
TOt Presiding Officer Of The Governing Body
Chief Administrative Official
FRONT Joe D. Rogers, Chief Administrator
i
DAM June 11, 1990
SUBJCCTf Approval Of 1991 Budget
Enclosed is the District's Proposed 1991 Budget. As with previous
budgets, this budget reflects the cost of providing the taxing 1
jurisdictions with quality appraisal rolls. In return for producing i
quality rolls I am asking each jurisdiction to support our proposed
budget,
As you review the proposed budget, you will notice an increase over
1990, The Increase is 6 g,9. p learily to the openieg of a southern
regional office. Af x(jote ) 442 of the real property accounts In
Denton County are located in the southernmost cities we serve. The
new office will enable the District to batter serve both property
owners and taxing jurisdictions in the area, The property owners in
the remainder of the county will be better served because the demand
on the Denton facility will be reduced, I trust that tech jurisdic-
tion will spree that this additional office is a move towards better 1
serving all our customers, The District can continue to make major !
Improvements to operations like this so long as the taxing jurisdic-
tions support our budgeted programs, j
Loekln close r. et Q d N qy, ill, re p~ #se that we era
proposing to'Imp'i!S 1 ofifl~e`lrifiFi1r.`1!siployet i
turnover at the District due to low salaries is having substantial
negative effect on the District's operations. Over half the current
employees have been with the District for less then four years,
i
F
i
s
° HEMO, APPROVAL OF 1991 BUDGET, JUKE 111 1990 Page 2
Every employee at the District has to have substantial knowledge of
their dally work assignment. The only way to acquire this job
knowledge is experience. Additionally, 60% of the employees attend
mandated classroom training. The classroom training culminates in s
mandated State exam. With the creation of the appraisal districts
came an edict from the Legislature to the effect that employees
I involved in collecting taxes, assessing, or appraisal of property for
taxation purposes will have verified knowledge of their job
functions. The problem we are facing is that many employees are
deciding that the combination of required job knowledge and formal
training warrant substantially higher compensation th4n they are
receiving,
As we move forward with the preparation of the 1990 appraisal roll,
all jurisdictions will experience some appraised values being lowered
in several categories for the first time. The values are being
reduced because the State Property Tax Board's most recent ratio
study indicates that our appraised values in these categories were in
excess of 1002 of market value, in recent years the District hoe had
discussions with several of ta.e taxing jurisdictions concerning level
of appraisal. We have been asked by some not to lower appraised
values, and for good reasons. Others have suggested that our
appraised values should be lowered. Granted, our sales studies have
indicated that in the last year or so values were dropping. However,
the previous State Property Tax Aoard's ratio studies did not
indicate that the District's appraised values were above 100% of
market at the time. Since the ratio studies represent a report card
on the District, and the actual ratios impact state aid to school
districts, we have had no choice but to avoid lowering appraised
values in previous years. To lover appraised values in the past
would have caused the school districts to lose substantial state aid.
Our goal is to help the school districts maximize state aid, not to
cause it to be reduced. I believe that each of you will concur that
we have done a reasonably good job of maintaining appraisal rolls
that reflect 1002 of market value arl for very good reasons. I must {
ask for your continued understanding and support as we perform in
accordance with our assignment.
As we lowered many appraised values for 1990, we fully understood i 1
that It would have an effect on the taxing jurisdictions. We under- 1
stand that your effective tax rate will probably be greater than your
currant tax rate. Even though the increased tax rate (effectiva tax
rate) will not actually bring in additional tax revenue, be assured
that the newspapers will do a sufficiant job of making the public
aware of the "tax increase", He that ae it may, values had to be
lowered. The lowering of values in the current market is just as I
appropriate as increasing values during the inflationary periods. i
assume that as each of you look over the proposed budget, you will
remember that it takes as much resources and time to generate
appraisal rolls with towered appraised values as it does to generate
one with increased values.
If
1
c1
P
r
MEMO, APPROVAL OF 1991 BUDGET, JUNE 11, 1990 Page 3
We have recently hod discussions with several jurisdictions about
value changes after the appraisal rolls were certified. Since 1985
I~ virtually all jurisdictions have ended their fiscal years with a
larger tax roll than was anticipated when the tax rates were set. i
The associated "extra" tax revenue helped substantially in each
jurisdiction's general operating funds (M60) and helped support bond '
rating confidence due to the positive Impact on debt service funds 1
(16S). DCAD caused the unanticipated revenue by holding firm on
disputed values. We have protected this revenue for the juriadlc-
tions by going to court when necessary. Of course, court action
becomes expensive and our proposed budget reflects a relatively large
legal expense account. However, the legal expense budget is necessary j
and pales in comparison to the potential tax revenue loss if we do i
not defend the appraised values on which the jurisdictions depend,
We a,. protecting your. right to tax property at 1002 of market value.
ke o b;.. your support in the endeavor,
In closing, I must emphasise that any steistance and support that a {
jurisdiction provides the District, is iii effect support by a jurts- !
diction for Itealf. A jurisdiction needs to receive a supportable
certified appraisal roll that represents 1002 of market value. The
Denton Central Appraisal District can supply the taxing jurisdictions
with such rolls. Since DCAD is in effect an extension of the taxing
jurisdictions we serve, we need your support to that we can continue
to provide your jurisdiction with these rolls,
i would ask that if you have any questions about the contents of this
memo, or simply needs clarification of any item, please give me a
call at (817) 566-0904, I appreciate an oppoi!tunity to {
clarify any matter concerning the District, I sincerely thank you.
F Joe b. f/ gar
i
I
~t
f b
r
i
i
I
I
I ~
I
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
1991 PROPOSED BUDGET
• i
I
h
, I
II L
.,~..aiyagy .
f
C
r
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
1991 BUDGET
TABLE Of CONTENTS
PAGE 1 BUDOET LETTER
~ I
PAGO 3 SICTION I - 3! SALARY SICTION
PAOL 4 SUMMARY Of 1991 BUDOETED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
AND COMPARISON TO THI 1990 BUD091 i(
PA01 S 1991 600017 ALLOCATION/ AND COMPARISON TO ?NI ( {
1990 990019 ALIMAVTO?JS
PAGN 1 1991 FXPENDITUREB BUDGET AND COMPARISON TO
1990 CXPNNDITUREB BUDGET 1
J
PAOE S SIC?ION 23 - St 9ALAR? SNCTION
PAO$ 9 SUMMARY or 1991 BUDOETED REVENUES AND IXPXNDX6URNS
4 AND COMPARISON TO TMI 1990 9UD,)CT
PAGO 10 1991 B'JDGIT ALLOCATIONS AND COMPARISON TO INN
1990 BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
1
PA01 12 1991 lXPENOITURES BUDOE? AND COMPARISON TO !
1994 IXPINDITURES BUDGET
TASLI Or CONTENTS CONTINUED ON NIX? PAGO
f
i
4
i
' 1
f
1
1 41
I
+6~ 1
Y
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
1991 BUDGET
TABLE Of CONTENTS (cont'd)
PAGE 13 lEC4IOM III - 91 SALARY SECTION
i
PAGE 14 SUMMARY Of 1991 BUDGETED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
AND COMPARISON TO THE 1990 BUDGET
PAGE 18 1991 BUDGET ALLOCATIONS AND COMPARISON TO THE
1990 BUDGET ALLOCATIONS 6
PAGE 11 1991 EXPENDITURES BUDGET AND COMPARISON 70
1990 EXPENDITURES BUDGET
SUPPORTING DETAIL SECTION
PA99 18 1991 BUDGET ALLOCATIONS WORKSHEET
PAGE 20 EXPLANATION Of EXPENDITURES, INCREASES & DECREASES I{
PAGE 41 1991 SALARY SCHEDULE
PAOE 42 SECTION 1V - TAX COLLECTION BUDGET SECTION
PAGE 43 BUMHARY or ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPINS18
,v. PAGE 44 ESTIMATED REVENUES TROM PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS
PAGE 4'S ESTIMATED EXPENSES
i
PAOE 47 EXPLANATION 0! EXPENSES i
Ilu
PAGE 83 SALARY ALLOCATION
1 +
I ,
I
j;
i
I
j
s
f
Novi
r ~
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
3011 MORSE ME E T
P.O. BOX 2116
4DINTON. TEXAS 74202-2114
11 T•54l-000!
JOE D. ROOERS, CTAIMPAMTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS:
Chi„ f Apoto1w JON BECK, Cheirnun
JOHN D. BROWN, APA CLARENCE MYERS, Mm Chairmen
Deputy CNot ApWsIw RICHARD BMITK Secretary
JOE A, FOASYtHe TROY WHIT!
DOWN Chef Appretaa-AA,Mm0syon HORACE BROCK
t
f
June 13, 1990
Chairmen Of The Rosrd
Members Of The Board Of Directors 1
Denton Control Appraisal District
Gontlem4nl
r
1
The Denton Central Appraisal District's Proposed 1991 Budget for
the fiscal year ending! December 31, 1991 is hereby submitted to
the Board, In accordance with Sec. 6.06 of the Texas Property Tax
Code, the Budget to alto being submitted to the 43 jurisdictions
that ftnancially support the operationt, of the Appraisal District.
The member jurisdictions served are located in Denton, Dallas,
Wise, Tarrant, Cooke, and Grayson Counties.
The Texas Property Tax Code requires that the Chief Appraiser
ensure that the appraised value of property for tax purposes be
1002 of market, The 1991 Budget was prepared considering that
mandate.
Beginning in the fall of 19900 the District will operate an office
In the southern portion of the county. The office is Intended to
provide better service to the property owners and the taxing
jurtedlctions in the southern portion of the county. The office
will serve as both an appraisal office and a tax collection
office, The coat of operating the office is shared between I
appraisal operations and tax collections,
The 1991 Proposed Budget to structured Into sections, The first
three sections reflect the impact on revenues and expenses of 11
granting 32, 32 and 82 salary Increases, Each section contains
summary sehodules, The third section also provides detail about ii
each expense. We have tried to provide sufficient information 1 1 -
in that each jurisdiction can fully understand the impact of the
various salary proposal$ on their allocated portion of the budget. I
~m.Ar
l wu
r ~ ~ 1
I
I
F
mpoSEn 1991 BUDGET, BIIDGFT LETTER Pogo 2
The fourth section of the budget is comprised of information
about the District's tax collection aparstion. The District to
propostug to collect property taxes for tvtlvejurisdictions
i
during the 1991 fiscal year. The tax collection
is funded by those taxing jurisdictions for whom the Diotrtct
collects taxes. 1
j
Sincere y~ ~
V V
Joe no Rogers
Chief Appraiaer
i
1
I
f
i
t
is
I
` FF
Page 3
i
I
y
i
SECTION I
THIS SECTION CONTAINS SCHEDULES THAT
t
REFLECT THE EffECT Of A 31 SALARY
INCAMASS AS Of JANUARY 1, 1991
1
,j
i ~
st,
f ;.r
' I
r ~I
I
I
I
1
J
1
i~
f
r
MOTOR CENTRAL APPRAISAI. DISTRICT Ps" q
SUHHARY OF 1991 BUDGETED REVENUER AND EXPENDIM MS
AND COWARISON TO THE 1996 BUDGET {
19% 1991
CLASSIFICATION BUDGET BUDGET
REVriNUE81
FUNDING FMOH JURISDICTIONS $1,737,863.00 $2o%6,972.13
INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 26.000.00 20,006.06
EXCESS 1999 REVENUES 661267.36 6.66
AVAILABLE IN FUND BALANCE 58,704.61 0.90
TOTAL REVENUES 51077054.99 82,686,972.43
o■u■o■■r■r ■■w■r■or■■r
EXPENDITURDSI
TOTAL 9t10GETBD EX WITURE8 Slj$77054.999 t2j$86■r9972,43
I
$4
1
4
Fi
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
s
IM ' 1991 BUDGET ALLOCATIONS Page 5
f AID CONPARISON TO TNS 1990 BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
I 1990 1991
BUDGET BUDGET
JURISDICTIONS ALLOCATIONS ALLOCATIONS
school Districto
ARGYLE ISO $28,373.03 $24,391.04 i
AUBREY ISO 9,680.93 11,390.23
DEKroN 13D 2821934.71 338,735.62
KRUH ISO 90124.66 110637:",J
LMM DALLAS ISD 34,105.86 400832.28
LEMISVILLB ISO 5150169.60 616,772.32
LITTLE ELL ISD 13,935.30 16,683.65 j
NORTHWEST ISO 123,635.26 1410797.58
PILOT POINT 18D 23,660.59 26,960.90
PONDER ISO 6,218.66 7,445.12
SANGSR 180 200001.67 24,904.21 I)
School Districts Totals $1,0601240.27 $1,261,770.24
DENTON COUNTY $260'183.62 __$311,497.53
~I
Citi4ai I
CITY OT ARGYIA $2,049.50 $2,453.70
CITY Of AUBRLY 863.41 1,033.59 I
TOWN Of BANTONVIL.LE 542.61 649.63
CITY Of Tile COLONY 40,799.93 48,846.51
TOWN Of CORIm 80649.45 16,355.31 s
ITY Of DSNC011 136t331 'a' 163 219.01
CI of txN>e 0 10567 1#017,91
CITY Of fiOWSR Now 38,165.32 45,692.36
TOWN OY NAC MMY 135.10 161.75
TOWN CT HICKORY CAM 31163.87 3,787.85
CITY OT HIGHLAND VIA 18,268.49 21,671,43
CITY Of JUSTIN 727,34 $70.79
CITY Of KRUOtRVIUA 301.83 361.36
I I CITY OE KRLM 736.76 884.46
CITY Of LYM DALLAS 4,088.27 4,884.99
CITY Of LAL®M VIL 261.22 312.73
CITY Of LQWLBVmu 107,973.96 129,20.36
CITY Of LITTIA SW 1,296.f1 1,552.35
CITY Of HUMIL CRK 71.55 55,70
CITY Of OAK POINT 754,64 903.60
{ CITY Of PILOT POINT 2,41'!.54 2,891.93
E CITY Of PONDER 134.48 161.00
CITY Of 110ANOKS 10186.45 10307016
CITY Of SAKCSL! 3,649.83 4,393.60
CITY Of TAMMY CLUP 5,859.99 7,028.38 t
o r.•r. r..........
Cities Totals $380,011.60 $444,926.62 I
.....•.rrrr .....r.rr.r
ALLOCATIONS CONTINUND ON NeXT PADS
i
}
8
ALLOCATIONS (CONVD) Page 6
1990 1991
BUDGET BUDOCT
JURISDICTIONS ALLOCATIONS ALLOCATIONS
s
Spacial DSattlcta0
Ct CARCREEK WATER
SM AUTHORITY $193.40 $231.54
CORINTH HUD 2,635,35 3,155.10 )
DENTON COUR'll JJRE {
DISTRICT 105.17 485.06
DENTON COUNTY LEVY tt
INPROV. DIST IS 20528.85 3,027,60
DOM COUNTY HUD 12 2,176.25 20605.45
DPW4 COUNTY HUD 03 3,903.06 40672.83
DBNTriN COUNTY ROAD &
liTMITY DIST. I1 70167.09 80700.32
DMA CO RICLAHATION:
ROAD & UT DIST 30860.72 40622.14
LAKE CITIES NUA 927.71 10110.67
TROPHY CM HUD 80509.63 10,167,31
SFDC"l DIET, TOTALS ,$320107.43 $360776.05
TOTA1.8
S1,7320613.00 $200610971.{3
1
i
i
46.
j
rile f
1
r•
r DMTON CCNTML APPRAISAL DISTRICT Page 7
1991 WE'NDITURES BUDGET
AND COMPARISON TO 1990 EXPENDITURES BUDGET
Ate' ------I------ 1990 BUDGET 1991 BUDGE!
5117 SALARICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5119 MAL SMITY 1PICA1. . . . . . . . . , , $951,162,16 $1,037,044.27 j
5120 GROUP WALTH INSURANCC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63,409.90 70,980.90
w 5121 R"IREMM (TCDRS) . . . . . . . . . . . . 60,564.00 94,324.95
5123 LONGEVITY PAY . . . . . . . . . . . 47,990.52 54,618.78
5124 AUTO CXCNBE RBI}6UR88TQ'N1' 80648.00 9,484.00 t
5125 NORXE1i8' COMP INSURANCE 87,784.80 103,026.00
130988.39 170631.96
5126 GENEfU11, INSURANC» 14,105.00 11,992.00 i
5127 AUDIT. , , a o i l , , , . . . . . .
5128 LEGAL SERVICES. , , a I' I , , , , . /,176.00 4,276.00
5129 OIL, GM, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL, 65,000.00 iN,ON."
AND UTILITY VALUATION . . . . . . . . . 120000.00 22,650.00
5130 DEEDS, SALE8, AND VALUE IN!W ATION . . . . . . . .
5132 PRINTING MRVICI. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51,130.00 56,190.51
. . . . . 36,836.40 33,168.20
5133 Off ICE SUPPLIER . . . a . . . , a a . a , 54,810.044 0 84.5134 NIMM & MQUIPMN, . a , . . a . , a . , , , . 00
H 41,211.32 4,470.00
5135 OFT ICE IUPENT HAINTONANCE, , , a , , a , , . . 5136 DATA PROC888IM KAINTDNANCE . , . . , , , , , , . a 7'460•" 7,400.00
5137 REGISTRATION, SUNCRIPTIONB & DUE=. . . . . . , . , 86,484.40 88,496.44
5138 SCHOOLS, CONf'IMNCES, AND TRAVEL. . . . . . . , , 164,.15 5,413.00
5139 POSTAGE 6 PMIGM . , a . . a . a , . . . . . . . . , "9080.00 13,400.00
3141 LEGAL NO1'ICL'8 4 ADVCRTIBING . . , , , , , a . , . , 36,908." 65, 2, 544 ON "
6143 ELCCTRIOMY WATER 6 BM . so 3,000.00 +
5145 TELEPHONE a a . . a , , , . , , , a , . , . . , 20,111.00 23,211.00 i
SL46 BUILDING WINTMAMF JANITORIAL SERVICES & 20,111,?6 27,718.38
GROUND HAIN1'INANCi, . , . . . . . 24,966.00 27,010,40
5146 APPRAISAL REVIMW IOARD, . , . a . . 190300." 11,9"."
5152 MINOSKY . . , . . a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 ON." 24,0","
9163 IUILDINO & LAND PAYHWT . . . , , a . , , . . , , . 69808." 69008."
9154 BUILDING & LAND DWROWIQINTB, . , a a . , . , . 3,ON." 30ON."
5155 NISCCIJ,ANM .
5156 (YL'NER A881T8. a 6,160.00 6, 760.0
760." 700.00
TOTAL
!1,877,734,99 $2,4186,972.43
ifffffMfffff if ffffffM~ff 1f
f
i
i
{
J
i
1
rr,
Page 8
i
t
SECTION II
THIS BCCTION CONTAINS SCHEDULES THAT
RIFLECT THE ErrICT Of AN 81 SALARY
INCREASE AS 0! JANUARY It 1991
i
i
f,
~ Ir
1
i
i
t
i
i
I
y _
riN
a
Page 9
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
SUMMARY OT 1991 BUDGVlVD REVENUES AND CXPENDITURM
AND COMPARISON TO THE 1990 BUDGET
s
1990 1991 I
CLASSIPICATION ---BUDGET-.-- BUDGET
ENUESo
rUNDINO !'ROM JURISDICTIONS S1,732,843.00 $2,1210208,61
i
INTEREST ON INVFATMENTB 20,000.00 20x000.00
EXCESS 1989 REVENUER 660207.38 0.00
AVAILABLE W lUND BALANCE 58,704.61 0100
TOTAL REV "lo s1,877,754.99 $2,141,208.61
EXPENDITURMr
TOTAL BUD06TED BVWDITUREB $1,877,754.99 $2,114,20!!.61
j~
i` Ay
a
r
a '
I
1
' f
y
r
r 4i raR
r
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
r 1991 BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
AND COMPARISON To THE 1990 BUDGET ALLOCATIONS Page 10
1990 1991
BUDGET aUDGET
JURISDICTIONS ALLOCATIONS ALLOCATIONS
•
Scholl Districtsi
ARGYLE ISD $20,373.03 $25,081.67
AUBREY ISD 9,680.93 1],918.40
DENTON ISD 282,934.71 348,326.98
KRUH 180 9x724.66 11,965.70
LAKE DALLAS ISD 340109.86 410988.45
LE+JISVILLE ISO 5150169.60 6340236.34
LITTLE ELM ISD 13,935.30 17,156.05
NORTHWEST ISD 123,631.26 144,761.97
PILOT POINT ISD 23,660.59 210517.91
PONDER ISD 6,218.66 71655.93
SANGEA ISD ____20.801.61 25,609.38
School Districts Totals $]-060,240.27 $1,296,218.78
DENTON COUNTY $260,183.62 $4174t311.64
Citim
CITY Or ARGYLE $2,049.50 $2,523.18
CITY Or AUBREY 863.41 16062.96
TOWN Or BARTONVILLS 542.61 666.02
CITY or THo comm 40,199.93 50,229.67
TOWN Or CORI NTH 80649.45 10,648.52
CITY Or DENTON 136.33 1.46 16I,9& 6s
CITY or DOUBLE OAK 10567.80 11930.16 f
CITY Or PLANER MOUND 380165.32 46,966.15
TOWN or NACKBERRY 135.10 166.33
TORN Or HICKORY CREEK 31163.87 308W I L
CITY Or WARLORD VIA 16,268.49 22,490x73
CITY or JUSTIN 777.34 471.19
CITY OT KRUGfAVILLE 301.8)
CITY or KRUM 738.76 909' 5!
CITY Or 1Jn DAUM 4,!80.27 50023.31
CITY or LA1g3m VIL 261.22 321.59
CITY Or L WISVILLU 1070973.96 132,SIS.13
CITY Or LITTLI ILM 10296.63 10596.31
CITY Or MARSHALL CRK 11.56 $6.12
CITY Or OAK POINT 754.66 929.06 J
CITY or PILOT POINT 2,415.14 2,913.82 11
CITY Or PONDER 134.48 165.56
CITY Or ROAM 10158.65 1,426.44
CITY Of SANGSR 30669.83 4,518.01 I
CITY or TROPHY CLUB 50889.99 7,222.70 w
Cities Totals $3800011.68 $4610801.01
AVOCATIONS CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE
0/' W
.
r
ALLOCATIONS (CONT'D) Page 11
1990 1991
BUDGET BUDGET
JURISDICTIONS ALLOCATIONS ALLOCATIONS
special Districts
CLEARCRC6K MATER-
SHED AUTHORITY $193.40 $238.10
CORINTH MUD 2,635.35 3,244.43
DENTON COUNTY FIRE 498.82
DISTRICT 495.17
DENTON COUNTY 1EV1f
IHPROV. DI3T 01 2,528.85 3,113.32 DENTON COUNTY MUD t2 2,176.25 2,679.43
DEHTON COUNTY )W t3 3,903.06 4,805.14
DENi'ON COUNTY ROAD &
UTILITY DIET. 11 . 7,267.09 8,946.67
DENTON CO RECLAMATION;
ROAD & UT DIST 3,860.72 4,75J.02
LAKE CITIES MBA 927.71 10142.12
81509.83 10,450.33
TROPHY CLUB NO
-
SPECIAL DIST. TOTALS --.532+407_43 --$39`871_
S2 18
TOTALS 51,732,843.00 , 124, 208,61
wwu+wwwow~~ ow.~ww~wowww
1 1 • p
iV
1
i
I
4
J
FF row, ~ l
i
P,
S
t DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
1991 ERPENDITURES BUDGET
AND COl4?ARi50N TO i990 L+DtPENDITURE3 BUDGET Page 12
ACCT CLASITICATION 1990 BUDGET 1991 BUDGET
5117 SALARIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $951,162.46 $1,0879386.23
5119 SOCIAL SECURITY (1 cm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63,409.90 74,391.35
; y 5120 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60,564.00 94,324.95
5121 RETIREMENT (TCDRS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47,990.52 57,256.63
5123 LONGEVITY PAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81648.00 9,484.00
5124 AUTO EXPENSE REIMUR8EMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87,784.80 103,026.00
$125 WORKERS CORP INSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,988.39 18,487.88
5126 GENERAL INSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,105.00 14,992.00
5127 AUDIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,275.00 4,275.00
5128 LEGAL SERVICES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65,000.00 100,000.00
5129 OIL, GAS, NAVY INDUSnMai,
AND UTILITY VALUATION . . . . . . . . . . 22,000.00 22,650.00
5130 Dam# SALES, AND VALUE INTORHATION . . . . . . . . 52,130.00 56,190.54
5132 PRINTING SERVICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,836.40 33,268.20
5133 OFFICE SUPPLIER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54,810.00 44,680.00
5131 FURNITURE & EQUIpMM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,221.32 40,470.00
5135 0rrICE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANM. . . . . . . . . . . . 7,400.00 7,400.00
5136 DATA PROCSSSING MAINTENANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . 86,480.00 58,496.00
5137 REGISTRATION, SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUCE. . . . . . . . . 4,851.45 5,623.45
5138 SCHOOLS, COWMWNC"# AND TRAVEL. . . 16,900.00 23,400.01
5139 POSTAGE & MIGHT' . . . . . . . . 38,938.00 65,938.00 E
5141 LEGAL NOTICES & ADVERTISING . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,500.00 31001.01
5143 ELECTRICMv WATER & SENBR . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,212.00 23x212.40
5145 TELBPMO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,111.75 27,715.36
5146 BUILULUG NAI11T6NACiN, JANI9bRM 61 MICES &
GROUND NAZitT61FC1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,968.00 270014.00
5140 APPRAISAL R1RV171N BOARD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,500.00 21,960.01
5152 CONTINGEIIC'T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200040.01 20,000.00
I 5153 BUILDING & LAND PAYMENT . . . . . 59,088.01 59,086.00
5154 WILDZW & LAND IMPROVTIl M. . . . . . . . . . . . 3,001.00 3,004.00
5155 NISCEI.UINDOUS 60100.00 60780.00
3156 OTHER ASSOTS. . . . . . . 700.06 700.00
TOTAL . $1,877,754.99 $2,144,208.61
i
i
E(
1
E
r
Page 13
3
t
t
§l
F
i
I
SECTION III j
i
THIS SECTION CONTAINS SCHEDULES THAT
REFLECT THE EFFECT OF A 5% SALARY
INCREASE AS OF JANUARY 1o 1991
1
i
i
S
1
t
1
J
{
i
J
r
Page 14
D6lM CBNTRIIL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
OW. ;64Y Of 1991 BUDGETED REVENM AND EXPENDITURES
AND CWARISON TO THE 1990 BUDGET
1990 1991
BUDGE
CLASSMCATION BUD=
14
FUNDING r" JURISDICTIONS 51,7?21843.00 $2,089,866.90
INTEREST ON INVESSf4M 20,000.00 20,000.00
EXCESS 1989 REVENUES 66,207.38 0.00
AVAILAPLE 111 TUND BALANCE 58,704.61 0.00
TOTAL REVENUES $1,877,754,9!i 521109066.90
W~mw~ one
i
I ~
1 I t
t
NIP 1-1
TOTAL SUMTED 11RFWD2TURE8 510877,754.99 52,14h,Si6.90
ff
i I
I
i
I
f
~1 I
t
I
i
k
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
1991 BUDGET ALLOCATIONS Page 15
AND COMPARISON TO THE 1996 BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
1996 1991
BUDGET BUDGET
JURISDICTIONS ALLOCATIONS ALLOCATIONS
School Districtes
ARGYLE ISO =26,373.63 $24,667.29
AUBREY ISO 9,686.93 11,121.56
DENTON ISO 282,934.71 342,572.16
KRUM ISO 9,724.66 11,768.66
LAKE DALLAS ISO 34,166.86 41,294.76
LEWISVILLE ISO 6161169.66 623,761.92
LITTLE ELM ISD 13,936.36 16,872.61
NORTHWEST ISO 123,636.26 142,963.33
PILOT POINT ISO, 23,666.69 27,196.71
PONDER ISD 61218.66 1,629.44
SANGER ISO 26,861.67 26,186.28
School Districts Totals $1,668,246.27 $1,276,649.66
DENTON COUNTY $266,18362 =316,026.67 f
Citissl j
CITY Of ARGYLE $2,049.50 $2,481.49 I
CITY OF AUBREY 863.41 1,046.46
TOWN OF bARTONVILLE 542.61 656.98 t
CITY OF THE COLONY 46,799.93 49,399.81
TOWN OF CORINTH 80649.46 160472.66
CITY OF DENTON 136 331.46 146,101.64
CITY 0 RUBE OAK 1,567.6s 1,698,21
CITY OF FLOWER MOUND 380166.32 460249.88 }
" TOWN Of HACKBERRY 135.10 163.68 !
TOWN OF HICKORY CREEK 3,163.87 30631.76
CITY OF NIOHLAND VLO 19,268.49 22,119.16
CITY OF JUSTIN 121.34 986.66
CITY OF KRUGERVILLE 341.63 366.45
CITY OF KRUM 738.76 894.48
CITY OF LAKE DALLAS 4,604.27 4,944.32
CITY OF LAKEWOOD VIL 261.22 316.28
CITY OF LEWISVILLE 1470913.96 134,723.41
CITY Of LITTLE ELM 1,296.63 11569.94
CITY OF MARSHALL CRK 71.69 86.61
CITY OF OAK POINT 164.66 913.73
CITY OF PILOT POINT 2,416.64 2,924.69
city OF PONDER 134.46 162.82
CITY OF ROANOKE 10168.66 1,402.87
CITY OF SANGER 30669.63 4,443.36
CITY OF TROPHY CLUB 6,889.99 70106.11
Cities Totals $384,01166 =464476-37
ALLOCATIONS CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE
F
Ile- V-
I
i
Page .16
199{ 1991
BUDGET BUDGET
JURISDICTIONS ALLOCATIONS ALLOCATIONS j
Special Dlatrlctes
CLEARCREEK WATER
SHED AUTHOPITY $193.46 $234.17
CORINTH HUD 2,636.36 3,196.83
DENTON COUNTY FIRE
DISTRICT 485.17 498.68
DENTON COUNTY LEVY
IMPROV. GIST 01 2,528.85 3,861.69
DENTON COUNTY MUD 82 2,176.25 2,634.96 3
DENTON COUNTY MUD 83 3,983.86 4,126.76
DENTON COUNTY POAD 6
UTILITY GIST. It 7,267.89 8,798.86
DENTON CO RECLAMATION
ROAD 6 UT DIET 3,866.72 4,674.68
LAKE CITIES NUA 927.71 1,123.25
TROPHY CLUB MUD 8,549.63 _W18_284.62
SPECIAL DIST. TOTALS :32,487.43 $39,215.38 I
TOTALS $1,732,843.88 ;2,889,866.98
,I
c
y<
0,1
~ I
I
1
i
i
r . vim
.
y
47,
r DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
o-
1991 E10PENDITURES BUDGET Page 17
AND COMPARISON TO 1990 EXPENDITURES BUDGET
ACCT CLUIFICATION 1990 BUDGET 1991 BUDGET
5117 SALARIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $951,162.46 $1,057,181.05
5119 SOCIAL SECURITY (FICA). • • . • • . • . • • • • • • 63,409.90 72,345.08
5120 GROUP HMTH INSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60,564.00 94,324.95
5121 RETIREMENT {TCDRB} . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 471990.52 55,679.92
5123 LONGWITY PAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80648.00 90484.00
5124 AM 1 / r . . . . . . . . 87r704.00,;, 1030026.00
5125 NORXXRS' COW INSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,985.39 17,974.33
5126 GENERAL INSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,105.00 14,992.00
5127 AUDIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.275.00 4o275.00
5128 LEGAL SERVICES. . . . . . . 650000.00 100,000.00
5129 OIL, GAS, IDAVY INDUSTRIAL,
AND UTILITY VALUATION . . . . . . . . . 22,000.00 22,650.00
5130 DEEDS, SALES, AND VALUE INFORMATION . . . . . . . 52.130.00 56,190.54
5132 PRINTING SERVICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361836.40 33,268.20
5133 OFFICE SUPPLIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54,810.00 440680.00
5134 FURNITURE & NQUIPHE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,221.32 400470.00
5135 OFFICE B=PMENT MAINTENANCE. . . . . . . . . . . . 7,480.00 7,400.00
5136 DATA PROCESSING MAINTENANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . 86,480.00 88,496.00
5131 REGISTRATION, SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES. . . . . . . . . 41851.45 5,623.45
5138 8C7100S.l1, COW r AN 161A416, 0 . . . . . . . . 16, 900.00 23, 4410.00
5139 POSTAGE & MIGHT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380938.00 65,938.00
5141 LEGAL NOTICES & ADY ISING . . . . 2,500.00 3,000.00
5143 ELICTRICI?Y. NATBR & SEVER . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,212.00 23,212.00
5145 T67.1PHONR . . . . . . . . . . 20,111.75 27,718.38
&
5146 BUILDDIG MAINTEN JANITORIAL 81MVICE9
GROUND 11AINTENAIIC9. 24,968.00 27,010.00
5148 A"WBAL WIEN BOARD. . . . . 190'100.00 211960.!!
51,32 c011RN0m! r°f''w"?►7"i• i'. 2►rOM.M ]/rON.M
5153 BUILDING & LAID PAYM811P . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54,888.00 59,080.00
SIS4 EUIIDM & LAID D41AOVlsm. . . . . . . 3,000.00 3,000.00
5155 HISCNU ANEOUB 6,180.08 6,780.00
4156 OTHBR AMM. 700.00 700.00
TOTAL . $1,877,754.99 $2,1@9,866.90
r {
t
i
,
s
l
I
1
i
s
pa
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
1991 BUDGET ALLOCATIONS WORKSHEET Page 18
i (ESTIMATED ALLOCATIONS)
1989 % OF DENTON OUT OF 1991
ORIGINAL TOTAL COUNTY COUNTY BUDGET
` JURISOICTIONS TAX LEVY LEVIES CHARGES CHARGES ALLOCATIONS
Schoolai
ARGYLE ISO $1,935,631.76 1.267% $24,667.29 $24,667.29
AUBREY ISO 919,186.81 1.573% $11,121.56 11,721.66
DENTON ISO 26,881,489.55 16.768% $342,672.16 342,572.16
v KRUM ISO 921,463.71 1.574% $11,729.48 $39.21 11,268.6
LAKE DALLAS ISO 3,241,381.21 2.120% $41,294.75 623,767.76
48,946,014.43 36.512% $623,761.92
IEWISVIIIE LSD 6
f
LITTLE ELM ISO 1,323,986.29 4.825% $16,872.61 16,872.61
NORTHWEST ISO 8,368,227.18 6.179% 5165,818.33 37,185.60 142,983.33
71
PILOT POINT ISO 1,565,154.55 1.938% $19,181.11 8,115.61 27,195.71
PONDER ISO 690,831.83 1.368% $7,629.44 7,629'44
SANGER ISO 1,916,356.61 1.232! _ $26166.28 26.186-20
- -
School Diet Totals $96,548,159.80 60.187% $1,236089.86 $46,169_80 $1,276,549.66
-
DENTON COUNTY $24,719-,920.38 15.416% - $316,025.67 $0.01 - $315-025.57
C1t1tsl
CITY OF ARGYLE $194,721.67 0.121% $2,481.49 $2,481.49
CITY OF AUBREY 82,631.83 1.161% $1,045.40 1,045.40
TOWN OF BARTONVILLE 616653.26 0.032% $656.96 656.98
q9,399.0
CITY OF THE COLONY 3,816,381.72 2.416% $19,399.81 10,472.66
TOWN OF CORINTH 821,780.12 1.012! $10,172.66 166,667.64
CITY OF DENTON 12,962,705.96 8.016% $165,067.64 1,090.27
CITY OF DOUBLE OAK 1480966.38 0.093% $1,898.27 46,219.88
CITY OF FLOWER MOUNO 30626,069.01 2.261% =46,269.88 163.50
TOWN Of HACKBERRY 12,836.12 6.168% $163.68 3,030.16
TOWN Of HICKORY CREEK 360,697.76 0.181% $3,830.16 22,119.15
CITY of 111ONLANO VLO 1,736,680.13 1.002% $22,119.15 801.66
CITY OF JUSTIN 69,104.31 6.043% $886.66 365,46 1
CITY of KRUGERVILLE 28,675.61 6.010% $365.46 894.48
CITY OF KRUN 710189.87 0.641% $894.18 40944.32 i
CITY OF LAKE DALLAS 307.664.52 6.242% ;4,946.32 316.28
CITY OF LAKEW000 VIL 24,810.66 1.015% $316.20 138*723.47
CITY OF LEWISVILLE 16,261,613.40 6.391% $136,644.32 $79.16 131,569.94
CITY OF LITTLE ELM 123,192.26 6.617! $1,664.94 86.67
CITY OF MARSHALL CRK 6,806.14 0.114% $96.67 913.73 j
CITY OF OAK POINT 110899.98 1.446% $913.73 2,924.69 €
CITY OF PILOT POINT 229,498.92 6.143! $2,.69 162.82
CITY OF PONDER 12,776.43 0.108% $116282.82 1,412.87 k
CITY OF ROANOKE 11'.602.56 1.669t $1,402.67 4,M 3.38
CITY OF SANGER 3400668.68 1.2111 $1,443.36
CITY OF TROPHY CLUB 544,601.46 4.339% $69946.29 `16b-.e2 r 7,116.11
244
Cities Total/ $36,082,171.26 22.493% 1469,631.40 $,91 $461,17637
k
i
M
w.
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
1991 BUDGET ALLOCATIONS WORKSHEET pegs 19
(ESTIMATED ALLOCATIONS)
1989 ! OF DENTON OUT OF 1991
ORIGINAL TOTAL COUNTY COUNTY BUDGET
JURISDICTIONS TAX LEW LEVIES CHARGES CHARGES ALLOCATIONS
Spacial Districts:
CLEARCREEX WATER 3
S14EO AUTHORITY $18.374.87 0.811! $234.17 ;234.17
CORINTH MUD 260,383.08 9.156! $3,190.83 3,190.83
DENTON COUNTY FIRE $4.00 s
DISTRICT 38,495.46 6.024! ;490.68 490.58
DENTON COUNTY LEVY ;0.00
IMPROV. DIST 01 240,264.90 0.159! $3,261.69 3,061.89
DENTON COUNTY MUD 02 246,764.34 0.129! ;2,634.96 2,634.96
DENTON COUNTY MUD 03 376,821.69 0.231! ;4.725.16 4,726.76
DENTON COUNTY ROAD A $4.00
UTILITY DIST. 01 6901'442.63 0.430! ;8,198.86 80798.86
DENTON CO RECLAMATION $0.00
ROAD 4 UT GIST 366,805.61 2.229! $4,674.66 4,674.56
LAKE CITIES MUA 88,141.26 4.455! $1,123.25 1,123.25
TROPHY CLUB MUD 793,200.85 0.494! $10,108.39 $172.13 16,280.62
Spacial Olst Total* ;3,063,440.64 1.910! r _ _ ? 1
Y
$39,443.17 ;112.13 ;39,216.34 I 1
TOTALS $164,414,552.13 100.099! $2,444,290.60 ;46,676.90 ;2,089,866.90 j
NtlNf~~~N~~~ N~L~N~ MMMwMNM ~M~N~N~ tlMW~~M~t ~ '
NOTEi 1) LEVIES ARE BASED ON JULY 25, 1989 CERTIFIED TOTALS PLUS VALUE CHANGES 1 1
FROM SUPPLEMENT 01 E J
2) NORTI&M ST SCHOOL DISTRICT HAS 8,864 ACCOUNTS IN DENTON COUNTY, { 1
1 1,803 ACCOUNTS IN TARRANT COUNTY AND 3,367 ACCOUNTS IN WISE COUNTY
3) PILOT POINT SCHOOL OISTICT HAS 3,549 ACCOUNTS IN DENTON COUNTY,
111 ACCOUNTS IN GRAYSON COUNTY AND 1,934 ACCOUNTS IN COOKE COUNTY
I
y
r
i
i
J ~
1991 BUDGET
EMANATION Or IXPENDITURES, DECREASES AND DECREASES Page 20
s
INCREASED
ACCOUNT OR
ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL IDCRREASED)
5117 SALARIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1991 BUDGET ■ $1,057,181.05 $106,018.59
1990 BUDGET - $951,162.46
THERE ARE 45 FULL-TIM EHPIAYEEB BUDGETED TOR 1991,
AN INCREASE OF THREE (3) OVER 1990. THE PERSONNEL
INCREASE IS DUE TO THE OPENING OF A REGIONAL OFFICE
IN THR SOUTHERN PART Or THE COUNTY. THS SALARIES
BUDGES INCREASE IS CAUSED BY AN INCREASE IN PERSONNEL,
THE REPLACING Or ONE POS17ION UITH A HIGHER PAYING ;
POSITION, AND A 5.01 SALARY ADJUSTMENT. THE 1991 SALARY
BUDGET REFLECTS A HET INCREASE Or 11.11 OVER 1990.
TOTAL SALARIES - ACCT t 5117 . . . . . . . $1,057,181.05 J
1
5119 SOCIAL SECURITY (FICA) . . . . . . . . . . . 1991 BUDGET • $72,345.08 $8,935.18
1990 BUDGET • $63,409.90
THE INCREASE 18 DUE TO ADDITIONAL PERSONMt SALARY {
INCREASNS, AND TM INCREASE IN LONGEVITY. THE 1991
FICA BUDGET mom 18 COMPRISED Or THE POLLOMINGo
L
(A) FICA ON SALMIRSi
I
BALMIER I{ FICA RATS FICA AMOUNT 1
I
$1,037,181.05 0.0765 $800874.35
I ~
(8) FICA ON LON MTY PAYt f
LONOEYITY X FICA RATS • FICA MOUNT I
I
$9,484.00 010765 725.53
(C) LB88i FICA ON SALARIES OF FOUR DGIAYEEB
NOT PARTICIPATING IN SOCIAL BRRIC MMi !
SAIANINS X rICA MTN • FICA AMOUNT
-
0.0763 $90254.80
TOTAL FICA - ACCT 1 5119 $72x345.08
itt
i
a
i
v ~
7 ~ I
1991 BUDGET
EMLARATION OF E(PENDIYURES/ I)ICRSAS9S AND DECREASES Page 21
INCREASED
( ACCOUNT OR
ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED)
5120 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . 1991 BUDGET ■ $941324.93 $33,760.95
1990 BUDGET ■ $60/564.00
THE GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE BUDGET 18 FOR *1PLOYEES ONLY.
THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT DOES NOT PAY FOR DEPENDE1t
INSURANCE. THE CURRENT ANNUAL BILLINGS TOTAL $191193.52.
WE HAVE BEEN ADVISED THAT THERE WILL PROBABLY 8E A 154+
INCREASE AT THE END OY 1990. BASED ON THE EXPECTED
AVERAGE ANNUAL COST PER•EMO'UOYEB, THE GROUP HEALTH
INSURANCE BUDGET ITEM IS CALCULATED AS rOLLOWSe
ESTIMATED
NUIEER OF ANNUAL COST
EHPLfrm x PER EMPLOYEE - TOTAL
E
45 $2,168.39 $971577.55
[BSS AMOUNT CHARGEABLE TO TAX COLLECTIONS $3,252.60
TOTAL HEALTH INSURANCE - ACCT # 5120 $960324.95
5121 RETIREMENT (TCORS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1991 BUDGET ■ $55,679.92 $70689.60
f
1990 BUDGET ■ $470990.52 I~
THE RL71PJM T EXPENSE 13 5.224 Of GROSS PAY FOR ALL
FULL.-TM PI WIIM. THE BUDGET CALCULATIONS AM AS ~
FOLLOWEe
A) TC OF WARM
! TCDRB TCDRB
--SALW x RATE -AMOOUNT
-
$1,057,18 L.95 0.0522 $55,184.65
10) TCDRB ON LOMMITY PAY1
TCDRS TCDRS
L01MG6VYTY x RATE - AMUUMR
$9,484.00 0.0522 $495.06
TOTAL RLTIRIMM - ACCT 0 5121. $59,679.92
< i
»I r ie"
1991 BUDGET, .
EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES Page 22
f INCREASED
' ACCOUNT OR
ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED)
5123 LONGEVITY PAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1991 BUDGET . $90484.00 $836.00
1990 BUDGET ■ $80648.90
EACH EMPLOYEE'S LONGEVITY PAY IS $4 PER MONTH FOR
EACH YEAR OF SERVICE. THE BUDGET INCREASE IS DUE
TO THE ACCRUAL OF THIS BENEFIT TO EMPLOYEES HIRED
BEFORE THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINS. AN EMPLOYEE HIRED
DURING THE FISCAL YEAR WILL NOT BE ELIGIBLE FOR
THIS BENEFIT DURING THE FISCAL YEAR.
TOTAL LONGEVITY PAY TO ALL EMPLOYEES . . . . $9,508.00
LESS LONGEVITY PAY CHARGEABLE TO COLLECTIONS $24.00
TOTAL LONGEVITY PAY - ACCT # 5123. . . . . . $9,484.00
5124 AUTO EXPENSE REIMBUAS MM . . . . . . . . . 1991 BUDGET • $103,026.00 $15,241.20
1990 BUDGET ■ $81,784.80
THE BUDGET INCREASE 18 CAUSED BY THE ADDITION OF
ONE APPRAISER AND ONE ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEE TO
LIST (A) BELOW. FURTHER, THE MONTHLY REIMBURSE-
HENT IS WERE imp BY $50 TO COMPENSATE THE
EMPLOYEES FOR INCREASED VEHICLE EXPENSES. IN
THE PAST, THE EMPLOYEES WERE PAID FOR HILEM
IN EXCESS OF 1,000 HMI. PER mom. THIS WILL. NO
LONGER BE THE CASE.
i
(A) EMPLOYEES THAT RECEIVE A STANDARD AMOUNT FOR
AUTO MIN N REIHBURSOMTs i
NUMBER OF RATE PER NUMBER OF
EMPLOYEES X MONTH x MONTHS TOTAL
24 $350.99 12 $100,500.00 {
(B) AUTO REIMMUR.410M TO FMPI.OYESIS THAT LO NOT
RECEIVE A STANDARD MONTHLY AM REIM BUREIDENT. j
THE PAYMENT IS FOR HARING MALL RUNe, PICKING
UP O1'FICE SUPPLIES, AND OTHER MISC. TRIPE.
MILES MUTE PER NUMBER OF
DRIVEN x mix X MONTHS TOTAL ~
530 $0.35 12 $20226.00
TOTAL AUTO REIMBURSO MT' - ACCT / 5124 . . . $103,926.00
NMI The 1989 Audit reflects an experae in
this wommt of $68,793.0.
E
1991 BUDGET
EXPLANATION OT EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES Page 23
INCREASED
ACCOUNT OR
ACCT CL&MIrICATION TOTAL (DECREASED)
5125 WORKERS' COMP INSURAWN. . . . . . 1991 BUDGET w $17,974.33 $3,985.94
1990 BUDGET - $13,988.39
THE INCREASE IS DUE TO THE INCREASE IN THE SALARIES
BUDGET AND A RATE INCREASE. THE RATES ARE STATE
nm CONTR UM. THIS BUDGET ITEM 18 CALCULATED AS
FOLLOIR9 i
(A) APPRAISERS 1 $2.61 PIV $100 $ALARYs f
SALAAM X RATE TOTAL
$168o952.77 2.61001 $14,849.67
j
(B) OR ICE CLERICAL t $.64 PE11 $100 SALARY t
SAim X RATE TOTAL
$488,278.29 0.64004 $3,124.66
TOTAvi NOMRS' COMP - ACCT 0 5125. . . . . . $17,974.33
5126 GENERAL INSURANCN . .141, . . . o f f . . 1991 BUDGET ■ $14,992.00 $887.00
1990• BUDGET $14,105.00
TO GENERAL INSURAM BUOONTF r M 10 COMPRISED Of
' THE lO12AMI11Ri
(A) WIWIMp CO1gTENTB, LTC. . . . . . . . . $40500.00
(B) BOND INSURMM $10516.00
(C) COMMM EQUIPMENT $2,603.00 i
(D) PUBLIC O"ICAL LIABILITY $4,540.00
(3) VAWABLE PAPERS. 51,700.00
(F) EHPLOYEES ormoo m" BONDS . . . . . . . $600.00
No" Ita" I
(G) NOTART REGISTRATI011. . $71.00 q
TOTAL 3ENERAL INSURANCE - ACCT 1 5126. . . . $14,992.00
I
1991 BUDGET
EXPLANATION OT EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AM DECREASM Page 24
4 INCRZAStD
AC DCCRT.ABED
CLASSITICATION O_
AccT
1991 BUDGET ■ 51,275.00 $0.00
5127 AUDIT. .
1990 BUDGM ■ $1,275.00
i
THIS BUDGET ITEM AMOUNT WILL REMAIN THE SAME.
$1,275.00
TOTAL AUDIT - ACCT A 5127.
Nrurrrr
5128 LEGAL SERVICES . . . . • . . . 1991 BUDGM ■ 51000000.00 8351000.00
1
1990 BUDGET ■ 865,000.00
k
THE BUDGET ITEM TOR LEGAL 8L1McM to BEING INCREAM
BASED ON ACTUAL UPERISM TOR THE PREVIOUS YEAR.
RECBNT G1iA1M IN 111E TAX cODE MAKE IT BUESTAN'tIALLY
BABIER TOR PROPSRTY OWNERS TO CWILLi1NGS VALUES ATTER
THS APPRAISAL ROLL IS CER7111ED. THE DISTRICT NAS BCCN I
PUT IN A POSITION OP HAVING TO SPEND ADDITIONAL FUNDS
TH~TRICT DOER NOT DEFEND To APPRAISAL ROM M APPRAISAL ROM WMR IN COURT, THS TAXING JURISDICTIONS COULD LO9B SUBSTAN-
TIAL TAP.lJS.
TOTAL LEGAL BLSRYICES - ACCT 0 5129. 8100,000.00
rrrrrrrrrrr j
rf4
NMI The 1969 Audit r4ilectr M MOMM in this Account
o! 877,759.15. { fI
I
5129 OIL, GAS, NERVY IMKIBTRIAL, 1991 BUDGET + 822,650.00 3650.00
AND UTILITY VALUATION. . . . . .
1990 BUDM r 822,000.00
E
THE BUDGET MOINT TOR 'PHIS LINE ITQ1 IE I1Rx1EA8171G BY `
A VERY 8WtlJI AMOUNT. THIS ITEM 18 CONTRACTED TOR A
TWO (2) YEAR PERIOD AND 1991 WALL CC THS WOOD YEAR
OT THI TIXSD RATS COIITRAM
922,65O.ee
TOTAL VALUATION SERVICES - ACCy' t 5129 I NrrNNN
I
lwwt¢~ i
~Naa4,
t
1991 BUDGET
a
EMANATION Of EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES Page 25
INCREASED
ACCOUNT OR
CLASSITICATION TOTAL (DECREASED)
ACCT -
5130 DEEDS, SALES, AND VALUE IATORMATION . . • . 1991 BUDGET " $56,190.54 $4,060.54
1990 BUDGET ■ $52,130 0
ITEM (T) a" iNCRT.ASED SUBSTANTIALLY TOR ONE YEAR ONLY-
TOR 1992 ITCH (T) WILL BE REDUCED TO APMIHATELY $50.
THIS BUDGET ITCH IS COMPRISED Of THE TOL.L(MIN01
(A) BUSINESS RECORDS HICROTILN
DECD INTO 1$3,780/MD. . . . . . . . . . $45,360.0
(B1 M082L.E MM N.A.D.)1 . . . . . . . . . . $75.00
(C) DATA QUEST - GUIDE FOR OLDER EQVIPMEM- $340.0
(D) DATA QUEST - VOLUMES 1 & 2. . . . . . . $630.0
IC) COLE (CRIBS/CROSS) DIR . . . . . . . $530.0
(T) PRICE INDEX TOR HUNNICUTT - - . - . . $90.0
(G) GENERAL EST MANUAL UPDATE - - $65.0
(M) AIRCRAIT DIRECTORY $65.0
II) AVIATION STATISTICS . . . . . . . . . . $70.0
(J) NATIONAL MAR1mR' BLUE BOOK . . . . . $85.0
(;0 AUTO AND TRUCK N.A.D.A. . . . . . . $70.0 {
(L) SRELI KMW DATA 4$49/HD. . . . . . $90.00
(H) MARSMALL+ AND SWAT UPDATE $216.85
(N) H.L.S. DENTOII BOOKS . $10.0
(p) 9.L.S. IDMISVILLS ON-LINE/ $1,140.0
CONPLTTER SEMI 1$95/110. . . . $220.0
IP) M/E TARRAAT co BOARD OT REA1R'ORS. . . .
(Q) MISC. OTHER SOURCRS - - - $490.00
(R) AERIAL MOM . . . 82,000.06 it
(8) APT.SURVEYIBRILCY Mum) . . . . - 8206.0
(T) CAR COST GUIDE. . . . $140.0
(U) AVIATIoK TRADE IN BOOK. $6210 {
(V) TRADE-A PIJINII $72.0
New ILM l 560.0
IN) VENICLi MISTRATM LIST .
804.0 1
I%► 1?OLlt CITY DIRBL"PORY . . . . . . . . . .
(Y) am cow BOOKS . - . . - . - 51,130.0
(2) MARSHAL SORIRCEB - 3 SETS - . $362.69
(A1) HeCL10 OMM WT RPRR-TRUE!( BLUS BOOK $164.0 ~I
IBl) POLICY HANAGIL!m SYSTEM VEHICLE mom { 1
PROCESSING. - $478.84
TOTAL SALES & VALUE INTO - ACC! 1 5130 . . . $96,196-54
MNNNN
I li
I
e
i
I
a;6 164
I
J
I
:a
d
1 ~
1 G •~la.» `
.
I
I
1991 BUDGET
EMANATION OF ERPBNDITUREBr INCREASES AND DECREASES Page 26
~J
INCREASED
ACCOUNT OR
ACCT CLASWICATION TOTAL (DECRLABED)
5132 PRINTING SERVICE . . 1991 BUDGET • $33r268.20 {$39568.20}
1990 BUDGET • $36,836.40
THIS ACCOUNT I8 CHARGED TOR ALL ITEM THAT ARE PRINTED.
DUE TO CHANGS8 IN STATE LAN CONCERNING NOTIFICATIONS TO
PRO[ERT"1 OWNERS' AGENTS, ADDITONAL REAPPRAISAL NOTIC98
NIO..L HAVE TO BE PRINTED AND HAILED. 1(28 BUDGET ITLN j
IS CALCULATED AS FOLLOWSi
(A) REAPPRAISAL NOTICES,
ownT`r X UNIT PRICE 'T'OTAL
1S0r005 ,55 $90000.00
(B) MICCWFFIICHE COPIM OT RLAPPRA26AL $7rr .00
NOTICESI • . . . . . . . . . j
II (C) CSRTIFILD TAX R012d1
•
PAG&S X UNIT PRIES -TOTAL
".0793 $30868.20
j
(D) CONTINUOUS TOP}! CHECR80 $3,050.00
(R) STATIONERY, LNVILOM, BUSINESS
CARDS, EXEMPTION Fol"0 INVOICES,
LABLIar AND VARIOU8 STANDARD TORMS, $9,555.05 if
(F) PRINT $fX=T - TB COPISSe $380.08
PRINT RBNDTTIONSO $85@•00 i
G i
f i
New Iteal 1111;
(H) APPBRTURS CARDS OF ORIGINAL ABSTRACT
MA M i PLATS . . . . . 04 . . . . . . . $10205.00
TOTAL PRINTING - ACCT A 9132. $33,266.25
NafN~M•r
j I
1
NOTG, Itsa jr) is a listing of office supply itW that have
to be printed, thus the inclusion in 'PRINTING 89WICES".
e
RkiVlt
W
f 1991 BUDGET
EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES Page 27
i
INCREASED
ACCOUNT OR
ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED)
5133 OFFICE SUPPLIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1991 BUDGET ■ MfM.00 ($10,130.00)
1990 BUDGET • $34,810.00
THE PUACHABE OF MICROFILN EMPHENT THAT USES PLAIN
PAPER FUS REDUCED THIS SUPW ITEH SIGNIFICANTLY.
FURTHER* THI UTILIZATION Of HIGHER DENSITY CONFUTER
TAPES W.9 REDUCED THI SUPPLIES COST. THS 1991 BUDGET
18 CONPRISEO OF THE rILLONINGs
(A) DATA PROCESSING SOPLIESs '
1. APPRAISED VALUE CORRECTION FORHS
QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE • TOTAL
30,000 --.$0.05 $1,500.00
2. GREEN BAR STGGT! FORMS - 1 PART
CASES X UK? PRICE • TOTAL
100 848.00 84,800.00
3. GLEN BAR STOCK FORD - x PART
CASES X UNIT PRICE TOTAL
•
0-•--
20 $6.00
j1,Zee.00
4. APPRAISAL CAM Foas~
QUANTITY X UNI? PRICE • TOTAL
GIs
84,300.00
5. MMC COMPM TAPES i
QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE TOTAL
30 $30.00 840A.00
i
$133 OFFICE SUPPLIES CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE
s~
1991 BUDGET
r.,•-. EXPLANATION 07 EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DSCRCASSS Page 28
Y INCREASED
ACCOUNT OR
ACCT CLASSITICATION TOTAL (DECAEABW)
5133 OTT ICE SUPPLIES (mtId)
M
(B) MAPPING SUPPLIESi
1. HIrROTILH READER/PRINTER PAPER
(PLAIN PAM)
REAMS X UNIT PRICE TOTAL
i00 $3.50 $350.00
2. HICROTIIH READERIPAINTER PAFTR
(WIND PAPER)
ROLLS x um PRICE TOTAL
10 $63.00 $630.00
I
j 3. BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION PAPER WHICH IS
USED IN WUEINO COPIES OF NAPS TOR THE
JURISDICTIONS.
i
SHEETS x UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1
-
S,AOA ~~55 ~.40
f 4. VELUM NAPPING PAPER
CARTON x UNIT PRICUI TOTAL j
---s-~----
$2150,00 i
S. ABOTRAC'T i NAP JAC OM TOR PLAT CABINETS
OUAN4M UNIT PRICE TOTAL i
■ E
kk~ 100 - $11,20 r -$2~24i.00
I f
(C) GENERAL OTTICE SUPPLMo
1. HAMM (DALLAS CO. A TARRANT 00.)
SETS., x UNIT PRICE TOTAL
$35.40 $700.00
i
5133 OTTICB SUPPLIES (XITIVUZD ON NEXT PAGE ~ ~
h f
t ~
I
r r"
1991 LUOGET
{ f EILPLAHATION Of WENDITURL+S, INCREASES AND DECREASES Page 29
! INCREASED
ACCOUNT OR
i ACCT CLASSITICATION TOTAL (DEC'REASED)
5133 OITICE SUPPLIES (cont'd)
2. ENVELOPES E
i
QUANTITY x UNIT PRICE TOTAL
139,000 $0.03 540050.00
3. RETURN WILL STATIONERY
1
QUANTITY x UNIT PRICE TOTAL
-
25,000 80.222 $5,550.60
4. COPIER PAPER (180,000 SHEETS ■ 360 ROM) {
REAMS x UNIT PRICE ■ TOTAL
360 $3.50 $1,200.00
S. HISCEL.LAXKM . PENS, PWILS, TYPEMAITER
R10101 Of fILE rOLDERS, TAPE, ERASERS,
ETC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $6,506.00
6. HICAMICHE SUPPLIES AND DUPLICATING
HICRMCNS . . . . .1 to . . . . . . $6,000.00
7. DOM ON P.C., SM ADMENTS, ETC. . . $200.00
TOTAL OffICE SUPPLIES - ACCT 6 5133. . . $44,680.00
5134 fURNI711NE i 1pIRP14Rn. .1991 BUDGET ■ $400470.06 ($200751.31)
I
1
1990 our= ■ $61,221.32 ~
(A) ADNWISWATION DEPARTHW ASSETS o
1. PAYMENTS ON COPM
QUANTITY x UNIT PRICH -
TOTAL
1 -s3,eob.ev $3,066.06
I
5134 FURNITURE ` EQUIPMENT CONTIL U OR NEXT PAGE
J
I
1991 BUDGET
F8 AND DECREASES Page 34
EXPLANATION Of EXPENDITURES, INCRSA9
(r .
f INCREASED
ACCOUlT!
ACCT CLASSIlICATION TOTAL (DECREASED)
5134 TURNITURR & EQUIVANT (cont'd)
2. PERSONAL COlWVM AND PRINTER TO 1%
USED BY Ama)IIBTRATIW PERSONNEL.
QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE ■ TOTAL
----r----_ 1
%WOOF
i _.r 84,900.00 $4/90000 €
i
3. TOUR DRAMER LEGAL TILE CABINET MOCK
s
QUANTITY x UNIT PRICE TOTAL
$209.00 $209.00
4. COIRPI ToR MORKSTATION & PURNITURB
QUANTITY I UNIT PRICE - -roThi,
___i 91,000.00 $1,990.00
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION DEPART101T ASSETS $13:109.00 }
(B) CLERICAL DEPARTNIZN'1' ASSETS i
1. TCLEPf " MR USB BY PUBLIC DURING f
AN SESSIONS
QUANTITY I UNIT PRICE TOTAL
f
---1---- $292.00 $292.00
2. COMBtTIR BINDER STORAGE RACKS
QUANTITY x UNIT PRIG, TOTAL
---2 .r_ -$304.00- $b10.00 f
3. TOUR DRAM P213z CABINET N/LOCK
QviursssY x tna? PP.ICE - TOTAL
1 $209.00 $209.00
4. ELECTRONIC HOSSAN BOARD rOR USE DURING ARS
TOTAL ;
V)AN1'ITY x WIT PRIM ■
$3,000.00 93,900.00 f
9134 nMITURE & NUIPNEMT CONTINUED ON NV PAOE j
i
S
i
i
t;. e.
s
1991 BUDGET
t
EXPLANATION OT EXPENDIWWo INCREA8E8 AND DECREASES Page 31
IIJCREASED
ACCOUNT OR
ACCT CLASSITICATION TOTAL (DECREASED)
5134 TURNITURE & EQUIPHOT (cont'd)
5. TYPEWRITER TOR SOUTHERN REGIONAL OTTICE
i
s
QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1
c i
1 $399.00 $399.0
TOTAL CLERICAL DEPARTMENT ASSETS . . . . . . $4x610.0 1
(C) DATA PROCC88ING DEPARTMENT ASBETSt
1. CONFUTER TERMINALS (REPLAC MIT)
QUANTITY x UNIT PRICE TOTAL
$40050.00
7. TAPE HANGING RACK
QUANTITY x UNIT PRICE ■ TOTAL
1 $386.00 $386.00
3. DOT NATRII PRINTER rOR PAINARY CO WSR.
REPLACEMENT Or PRIfIPER PUROMW IN 1983.
li WAN'IITY I UNIT PRICE TOTAL
..-1 -01,619.0 -$1,619.00
i
TOTAL DATA PROCOSSM AUST8 . . . . . . . $60055.0
i
(D) RC8PJIRCN i TRAIISM AMM i
1. CHAIR
QUANTITY I UNIT PRICE TOTAL
i---- - ezle.ee -$z1e.e0 `
1
5134 MWITUR6 & EQUIPMENT CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE
I
i
r,~
MEN
1991 BUDGET
1 '
I ~
EXPLANATION Of EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AA'j CECRWES Page 32
r» , INCREASED
ACCOU11T OR
ti ACCT CLASSITICATION TOTAL (DECREASED)
I
5134 FURNITURE & EQUI14M (cont'd)
2. PLAT CABINET
QUANTITY x UNIT PRICE TOTAL
r$21b".00 $2,809.00
3. APERTURE CARD READER/PAINTER - 3 YEAR LEAKS PUK A S
MONTHLY i
PAYNENTB x PAYNENTB TOTAL
12 $520.00 $6,240.00
4. PLAT & HAP CAMERA - 5 YEAR LEASE PURCHASE
PAYHENiB I UNIT PRICE TOTAL
12 $6,96@.00
.$580.00
TOTAL RE LA" & TRANBTER ASSITS . . . . . $16,219.00
(E) CDH1 MIAL & LAND DEPARTWINT A88L'T8 s
1. TASLE TOP DOT MATRIX PRIlMll
!
QUANTITY I UNIT PRICS TOTAL
! 1 $973.00 $973.0!
2. nW DRAW LISTER BILE tits CARDW M/LOCK
x UNIT PRIG • . TOTAL...
1 $242.00 $24200
TOTAL C019WIAL & LAND A"M . . . . . $1,215.08
(F) REBIDlNTIAL PAOPERST A88ST8i
1. HUUPItUNmoN CALCUI 7m (R6PlJ4Com") Ji
QUANTITY x WO PRICE • TOTAL I
6 $227.00 $10362.00
TOTAL RSBIDENTIAL ANSTS . $1,362.00
TOTAL tURNITURE & am" - ACCT 0 5134. $40,470.00
NN•M■N
t
J
I
r.
C
1991 BUDGET i
EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES rage 33
r.
INCREASED
ACCOUNT
ACCT CLASSItICATION TOTAL (DECREASED)
! - - - -
5135 OTTICE EpUIPHENT RUNTENANCE . . . . • . . . 1991 BUDGET ■ $70400.00 $0.00
1990 BUDGET ■ $7,400.00
ALL MAINTENANCE OF OTTICE WPHENT EXCEPT TOR THE
COHPITTER AND COlgUTER PERIPHERALS IS CHARGED TO THIS
ACCOUNT. THE EoUIPNENT INCLUDES ALL TYPEMRITERSr
ADOING HACH M* TORHB BURSTER, BLUEPRINT Not=*
AND COPIBRB. THE INCREASE TOR TH6 1990 BUDGET Ie
BASED ON MAINTENANCE COST HISTORY.
TOTAL OTTICS EQUIPT HAINT - ACCT s 5135. . . $70400.00
5136 DATA PROCESSING MINTE1111NCE. . . . . . . . . 1991 BUDGET ' $880496.00 52,016.410
1990 BUDGET ■ $660480.00
THIS ACCOUN'T' 18 C wRIM Of BOTH DATA PROCEe M t
HARDWARE AND W MARE NAIWMANCE. BORN ITEMS ARA
CHARGED TO THIS ACCOUNT e0 THAT THi TOTAL COST OT
DATA PROCESSING WILL BE SHOWN IN ONE ACCOUNT.
F
(A) HARDWARE MAINTEIUWCEO 1
1. HAINT7UMS 6 ACCESSORIBB $22.415.00
2. 1200 LPN BAND PRINTER . $3,315.00 s
3. 600 LPN BANK PRINTER. $20715.00
$20115.00
j 4. 600 LM SAND PAINIBR. - .
4. 3 BA. 515 1S rim DISK DRIP` WITH $30360.00
CASINST . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. 9-TRACKO 1600 91,I175 IPS Tull E
DRIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $10761.00
6. 9-TRACK 620011600 BPI TAPS DAM - . $10900.00
7. VARIOUS MARDWARS CONNEG'l'IOM O CABLE
AND N~ViN177 BQUIPII W - $10500.00
S. PC ~ • • , $l, 800.00
9. UPS MAIIrTB mm 520200.00
(B) SOTTWARH HAINTENANC31 j
1. CONTRAC? MAINTQNfX", . $120415.08 1
2. AmmeITION Of VARIOUS SOTTWARS }
3. DMIGNATBD PROGRAMMIN BZPEIIM 560000.00
4. VARIOUS PROGRAHS171b CHANGES - . $60360.00
5. TRAINING ON PC AND WORD PROCMING. s10640.00
CcMt►rER PROGRM4HIN0. $40500.00
6. MICRO
TOTAL D.P. MAIM - ACCT A 5136. $66,496.00
s
i
~r
~ a I
1991 BUDGET
EXPLANATION Or EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES Page 34
i
INCREASED
ACCOUNT OR
ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED)
5137 REGISTRATION, SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES . . . . . 1991 BUDGET ■ $5,623.45 $772.00
1990 BUDGET ■ $40851.45
THIS ACCOUNT IS CHARGED FOR ALL H"rRSHIP AEGISTRA-
TIONS, SUBMIPTIONS TO EDUCATIONAL MEDIA, AND
MEMBERSHIP DUES.
(A) TE*M ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICMS
181FBERS 1 $40 PER YEAR EA. . . . . $1,0J0.00
(B) INTERNATIONAL ASSOC; OF ASSESSING OfftCERS
2 MEMBERS 1 $95 PER YEAR th . $190.00
(C) TEXAS ASSOCIATION Or APPRAIBAL DIETS . . $800.00
(D) DENTON AND U&SWILLB BD. Or REALTORS. - $175.00
(E) BOARD OF TAX PACFE88IONAL UAHINERB
25 HEEBERS 1 $35 PER YEAR EA- . . . . a $875.00
(r) NORTH DALLAS TARO. - . a . - . a . a a a $100.00
(6:) N/E TARRANT CO. BOARD Or REALTORS. - a - $500.00
(H) VARIOUS rINANCIAL OAfNUAiIATIONS. . . . . $440.00
(I) "840.,O m . . . a . - . . a a - a . - $94.00 1
(J) WALL STWI: JOURNAL. - $119.00
(K) NATIONAL AUTONO EA D ALM . $35.00
(L) TEXAS PAPA & RECREATIONS HMAZINC . $10.00 y
(H) TEaM WMICIPAL LEMW a a a a . . . 8250.00
(N) COBRA MTV ON SmmCE $828.00
(0) ZIP CODB DIR)MVI 04 a 000.1 . - . $33.45
Now Itest
(P) EXDGIITIVE STRATNGIES 75.00
i
(Q) TIM PERRYNAN REPORT. - 99.00 E
i ~
TOTAL REGIS., 8UBOC & DUES - ACCT 1'5137 $50623.45
N~~NN~ I I
For property owners to road as they wait to see an appraiser. I
ell
T
i'
h 1991 BUDCFT
MIsMATION Or EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES Page 35
INCRMED
ACCT CLASSIFICATION ACCOUNT OR
TOTAL (DECREASED)
5138 SCHOOLS, C011[ER wmp AND TRAVEL . . . . . . 1991 BUDGET r $23,400.00
56,500.00
1990 BUDGET r $16,900.00
THIS BUDGET ITEH IS USED TO ACCOUNT rOR ALL EDUCATIONAL
RELAT9D TRAINING AND TRAVEL. THS TRIPS TO AUSTIN TO
PROTEST THE STATE PROPERTY TAX BOARD VALUE rINDDM
ARE ALSO CHARGED TO THIS ACCOUNT. TKd SCHOOLS THAT
ARE REFERENCED IN (A) ARE HANDAWRY.
(A) REQUIRED APPRAISERS' SCHOOLS
REGISTRATION + LODGING + HEALS • COST PER COURSE
$50.00 $160.00 $100.00 $310.00
no. or COST PER COURSES COURSES x COURSE x TOTAL
60 $310.00 $180600.00 1
(B) TRIPS TO AUSTIN 1% SPT8 PAOTEM . . . . $10600.00
(C) DATA PROC. & SECRETARIAL TRAINING# . . .
sl,eae.ea
(DI rI!'ANCE RELATED SCHOOL& . . . . . . . 61,000.00
New Item
(r) TIM ASSOCIATION Or APPRAISAL
I DISTRICTS ANNUAL !lATTNG . . . .
i $s,200.ev ~
TOTAL SCH001B & TRAVEL - ACCT 4 5136 . . . . $23.400.00
rrrrrrrrrr
NMI E
xpMpS in
this AecourtL for 1989 were $25,656.12.
f }
5139 POSTAGi & I'MIGNT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1991 SUDGET •
865,938.04 $271000.00 I
1990 BUDGET r $38,935.00
THIS BUDGET I'174H IS SIM INCREASED BECAUSE Or A 20t
INCREA8E IN POSTAGE. ALSO, THE DISTRICT IS NOW }
REQUIRED TO SEND INFINaT20N TO TAX AGENTS IN ADDITION
TO PROPERTY OWNERS. `
(A) REAPPRAISAL NOTICES, WHICH AR! NAILED in ALL
I
PROPERTY OWNERS AND AGENTS ON NAY 15THe
180,000 NOTICES t 5.30 EA. . . . . . $540000.00
5139 POSTAGN & FREIGHT CONTINUED ON NEXT PACE r
1
s
Ir ~ j
( t
1991 BUDGET
EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES Page 36
INCREASED
ACOoUlr" OR
ACCT CLA88IFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED)
3139 POSTAGE & FREIGHT (oont'8)
(B) GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE, WHICH INCLUDES
LETTERS & PACKAGESo. $2,000.0@
(C) SUPPLOMMAL VALUE NOTICES, WHICH ARE SENT
y~. APPROXIMATELY 5 TIM i
2,000 NOTICES f $.30 EA. X 5 MAILINGS. $3,000.00
(D) CERTIFIED MAIL FOR ARB ACTIVITYi . . . . $2,000.00
(E) LETTERS SOLICITING SALES INFORMATIONi. $3,750.00
(F) SENDING CHECKS TO PAY BILLSi . . . . . . $600.00
k
(G) POSTAGE MACHINE RENTALS. . . . . . . . . $588.00
TOTAL POSTAGE & FREIGHT - ACCT N 5139. . . . $65,938.00
I
5141 LEGAL NOTICES & ADVERTISING . . . . . . . . . 1991 BUDGET r $30000.08 $500.00 ~
k
1990 BUDGET - $2,500.80
THIS ACCOUNT 18 CHARGED FOR ADVERTISIOM IN NEMBPAPERS
CONCERNING EXEMPTION NAT IRS SUCN AS MOFOSS' TSADSr OVER-63,
DISABLED VETERANS, AM PRODUCTIVITY VALUATION MATTERS.
OTHRR ADVERTIBEN; " MAVI TO DO WITH APPRAISAL RSA N f
NOTICES, NLSCYAAMOUS CLA88I1'ISD ADVERTISING, AND f
INVITATIONS TO BID.
` TOTAL LEGAL NOTICES & ADM - ACCT / 5141. 93,000.00
5143 ELECTRICITY, MATER & SEMER . . . . . . . . .1991 BUDGET ■ $23,212.00 $0.00 E
1990 BUDGET - $230212.00
r
rent HAS BEEN NO INDICMION THAT THE CHARGES FOR
THE ITI?ffi BUDGETED IN THIS ACCOUNT WILL B8 INCREASING.
ACCORDINGLY, THIS BUDGET ITM IS NOT BEING INCRUMD.
TOTAL C1.ECTRIC, MATER & SEMBR'- ACCT' ! 5143. $23,212.00
k
4
1991 BUDGET
EXPLANATION OT EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES Page 37
i
r
INCREASW
ACC 1 ACCOUNT OR
----------------------~B--I----------------- (DECREASED)-
5145 TELEPHONE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1991 BUDGET ■ $21,718.38 $7,606.63
1990 BUDGET r $200111.75
THIS ITEM I8 INCREASING TOR 1991 PRIMARILY TO ACCOMMODATE
r,, , ITEMS (r), (0) AND (H) BELOW.
(A) LOCAL AND METRO LIM
$1,541 PER MONTH X 12 MONTHS . . . . . . $18,492.00
(B) CHARGE TOR COMPUPER MODEM 1'O THE
SOMARE GROUPi. $288.00 ;
(C) MJTIPLI LISTING SMMcs TELEPHONE COMPUTER i
LINEr. . . . $480.00
(D) QUARTERLY MATNT6Al ; $1,925.00
(E) PURCHASE OF DIRECTORIES, f
AUBRUY $6.80 LX DALLAS $18.20
CARROLLTON $5.25 LWISVILL $16.25
D/rw $200.00 HCXINNEY $6.80 $253.30 3
New IteMr
' (F) MULTI BUTTON PMMONES P (Rulmi m) • . . S 1,200.00 l
(0) PAYHRM ON P10NE SYSM IN SOUTHERN
REGIONAL OTMCEf
12 MONTHS f $173.34 PER MONTH. . . . . .
(H) LINES TO BOUTHERIL REGIONAL OrrICEr $,080.08
933,000,00 ~
TOTAL TELEPHONE - ACCT 0 5145. . . . . $27,718.38 i
■urrrowr
r
5146 BUILDING MAINTENANCE, JAliiT Lal SERVICES,
AND GROUND MAIM'ENANCE 1991 BUDGET ■ $270010.00 $2,042.00 }
1990 BUDGET ■ $24,968.00
THIS BUDGET ITEM COMPRISES ALL MNJIIL'IW AND GROUNDS
MAINTE mm. AT we POINT IN THE
rums?
NEAR
TM6AE
i
WILL NAVO TO BE 8U8STAIrI'IAL TUNDB BPEMT' ON RLPI.ACINO '
PART, OR ALL O4', THE AIR CONDITIONING UNITS. ~
(A) JANITORIAL SERVICEr ,
PER MONTH X MONTHS TOTAL
51,150.00 12 S1.l,800.00
i
i
5146 BUILDING MAINTENANCE, JANITORIAL BMMCEB,
AIM MOM MAINTENANCI: CONTINUED ON 11W PACE i
r
1991 BUDGET
EXPLAXATION uT EXPENDITURES, INCREASES JU?D DECREASES Page 38
INCREASED
~ccom
AC ----CLASSIlICATION---------------------. -AL (DCCREASED)-
I
5146 BUILDING !U►IN9`LNANCE, JANITORIAL SERVICES,
AND GROUND MAINTENANCE (aont'd)
(8) GROUNDS MAINTENANCE SERVICES
PER 1400TH x MONTHS TOTAL
$425.e6 10 $4x250.00
i
(C) "BACK" YARD MOVING
PER MONi'H x MDNTHS TOTAL
$75.00 6 $450.00
I,
ID) JANITORIAL 3UPPLIES1
PLR MONTH x NONTHS - TOTAL
I
--$13.00 1s $900.00
f
(E) RNMI PICK UP (TRASH)i
PER MONTH x MONTHS TOTAL r
$25.00 12 $300.08
(r) AIR CONDITIONING NAIN'1'ENAN l
PLR QUARTER x pUAAT/RS TOTAL
I $10.00 4 $569.00
(0) 9XT01HINATI110 WI DINGi
PER MOWN I MONTHS TOTAL
$908.$ I
-$73.06 --12 r
(H) WILDING, LLdfTRICAL, AND PLUMBING f
MAINTINANCDi . , . . , , , s e e , , $2000.00 i
11) FIRE ALARM MAINTENANC6i , . . , , , , $488.80
(J) DLMZ IR AND FIRS ALARM HMTORIN o . . . $720.08 i
i
(K) DZRGENCT AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRSi . . . $21500.60
IL) PURCHASE Of tLAGSi , . . . , . , . , , , $150.00
i
TOTAL SLW i GROUND HAM - ACCT 6 5146. , , $21,616.08 EI
brrrrrr■r 1
1I
1\ 1
r
i."
l
C
1991 BUDGET
9VLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES Page 39
f • INCREASED
ACCOUNT OR
TOTAL {DECREASED
ACCT I,'iJIS8TTICATION
1991 BUDGET ■ $21,960.00 $2,460.00
5149 APPRAISAL REVIEN BOARD .
1990 BUDGET ■ 519,500.00 "
THIS BUDGET ITEM 19 CHARM FOR PAYMENTS TO ARS MEMBERS
~n FOR WORK DURINO THE MANDATED VAIAIE EQUALIZATION PROCESS.
(A) MAY, JUNG AND JULY MEETINGS,
NUMBER OF PAY PER NUMBER OF TOTAL
PAY
MEMBERS X DAY EA. X DAYS `
$18,000.00
9 $80.00 2S
(B) 4 SUPYLCHWAL ALL DAY MEETINGS,
NUMBER OF PAY PER NUMBER OF TOTAL
MEMBERS X DAY EA. X DAYS PAY i
j
g $80.00 4 $2,880.00
j
(C) 3 SUPPLEMENTAL HALF DAY HUT NGB,
NUMBER OF PAY PER MMNR OF TOTAL
r }Com X DAY EA. X DAYS
..PAY_--_
____.9
$40.00 3
$1:~.~
imi, APPRAISAL REVIEIf BOARD - ACCT $ 5148 . $21,960.00
{ 5152 CONTINtMMY. . . .1991 BUDGET - $20,000.00 $0.~
1990 BUDGET - 120,000.00
FUINDA ARE BUDGO'1'ED IN TMU ACWW FOR ALL ~
UNANTICIPATED &VOMIT" $20,000.00 ~
$59,088.00 $0.0A
~
~ 9153 BUILDING & LAND PAYlUENT. 1991 BUDGET ■
1990 BUDGET - $59,088.00
fM THI PAYMENTS ON
THIS CCOUNT IS
APPRAISAL D STRICTC 'S RRUUIIDING AM LAW NOT10THS
MONTHLY NUMBER OF TOTAL
f
i PAYMENTS X MONTHS X ACC'! 5153
$4,924.00 .12 $590088.00
1
)
r Lt
G
1991 BUDGET
CxPIANATIOA 07 MaWDITURSBr INCRfAMES AND DscmwEs Page 40
INCREASED
ACCOUNT
i
CLASSIfICAMON TOTAL (DECREASED)
5154
I
BUILDING & LAND INPROVDVM . . . . . . . . 1991 BUDGET - $3,000.00 $0.00
1990 BUDGET - $3,000.00
ACQUISITIONS OR IHPROVQEM ANNUALLY. CERTAIN "SET
I
osd SHRUBS, TREES AND 1,AIDSCAPING. . . . . $30000.00
i'
1991 BUDGET - $60180.00 $600.00
5155 MISCELLANEOUS 1990 BUDGET - $6,180.00
THIS BUDGET ITCH YS CHARGED fOR EXPENSES THAT WILL
NOT RBAStWBLY -fiT- IN ANOTM CATEGORY. I
i
(A) am SERVICE CHARGE $150.00
(B) !Ilia & TIL K PROCESSIAG i .
11 $1,000.00 '
f (C) KSCMANCOUSs . . . . . $180.00
k (D) COERCE CUM I . . . . . . • • • . . I (E) Pjcrw ASYNG Uw*WLOYHwl • • • • • . . $5,$000"..00
06 ,
.00
in am DEPOSIT sue. . . . . .
TOTAL MSCELLANDOUB - ACCT 6 5155. . . . . . $6,780.00
rrrrrro.r
5156 OTHER ASSETS . . . . . . . .1991 BUDGET • 8700.4N1 $0
i
1990 BUDGET • 8700.00
I
THIS ACCOUIR IS USED TO PUACHABS NINOA ASSETS.
(A) MMBURING 10=81
TOTAL
QUANTITY x UNIT PRICE
$500.00
(B) 100 TOOT WMURINO TAMES
QUANTITY I UNIT PRICE TOTAL '
I
$20.
I TOTAL. OrM ASSETS - ACCT 1 5151. . . $70B.e0
7
~ i
I I
M
+IIfM`i ' it
ilt■ ~V~
1
l
r
1991 SALARY SCHEDULE Page 41
1991
TITLE SALARY
CHIEF APPRAISER ---$56,939.41
t DEPUTY CHIEF APPRAISER $46,346.21
DEPUTY CHIEF APPRAISER-ADMINISTRATION $44,972.01
APPRAISAL SUPERVISOR-COMMERCIAL & LAND $39x657.86
APPRAISAL SUPERVISOR-PERSONAL PROPERTY $35,793.17
APPRAISAL SUPERVISOR-RESIDENTIAL PROP $36,487.27
DATA PROCESSING MANAGER $38,502.79
APPRAISAL SUPPORT HANAGER $37,800.00
APPRAISAL SUPPORT SUPERVISOR - II $27,501.86
APPRAISAL SUPPORT SUPV II - SOUTH off IC $15,624.00
RESEARCH & TRANSFER SUPERVISOR $28,233.54
ASSISTANT DATA PROCESSING MANAGER $21,207.30 j
APPRAISAL SUPPORT SUPERVISOR - I $24,251.92
HICROCOHPUTER t3P ciALIOT $22,001.49 ,
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT S22r001.49
ASSISTANT RESEARCH & TRANSFER SUFV $190816.66
ASST APPRAISAL SUPV-COMMERCIAL & LAND $29,467.56
ASST APPRAISAL SUPV-PERSONAL PROPERTY $27,737.46
ASST APPRAISAL SUPV-RESIDENTIAL PROP $26,528.25
COMMERCIAL & LAND APPRAISER $26,401.79
COMMERCIAL & LAND APPRAISER $19,889.52
COMMERCIAL & LAND APPRAISER $18,764.01
COMMERCIAL & LAND APPRAISER $20,021.54
PERSONAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $18,448.25
PERSONAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $230095.28
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $24,508.52
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $22,6417.59
RE82DCNTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $22,179.89
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $18,764.01 I
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $20,002.79 +
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $18,151.23
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $170161.16
APPRAISAL SUPPORT CLERK $13,937.50
APPRAISAL ASSISTANT I
APPRAISAL ASSISTANT I $13,439.03
APPRAISAL ASSISTANT I $13,766.33
APPRAISAL ASSISTANT II- SOUTF M OFFICE $9x975.00
APPRAISAL ASSISTANT I- OWTHERN OFFICE $81400.00
INTOAMATIO'N 8PECIALI89' SU,989.61
INFORMATION SPECIALIST $16,501.12
INFORMATION SPECIALIST $140969.61
I RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECHNICIAN $160789.95
RESEARCH & TRANSFER TKMCIAN $16,789.95
RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECHNICIAN $15r500.23
RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECHNICIAN $14,361.31
RECEPTIONIST $14x230.57
R CORDS HARAGCR & LIAISON OFFICER $2,625.00
i
t
i4
i
F
I~ Page 42
I ~
k~ 1
SECTION IV
THIS SECTION CONTAINS SCHEDULES THAT
PERTAIN THE TAX COLLECTIOM OPERATION
i
III
1
~A
!J
J
1
~r
Ij
9 1
~ f.
3 ~
i?
rirw ~Page 43
DM" CORM APPRAISAL DISTRICT
1
1991 TAE COLLECTION BUDGET
SLMWY OF ESTIMTED REVENUES AND EXPENSES
i
CWSIFICATION BUDGET
REV6NIIC$i-------------------------- 1990 1991
-B-----
ESTIMTED TAE COLLECTION FEES
33,880.00 S182,e88,90
ff fffNrfr
■rNrfrrrff
EXPENSES,
ESTINATCD EXPENSES
$34,880.00 5182,888.08
foorNfrr .
I
y. X h
1
i
f
ra-a~ it
i
C
R
Page 44
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
1991 TAX COLLECTION BUDGET
ESTIMATED REVENUES PROH PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS
1991
1990 ESTIHATED CHARGE
.JURISDICTION BUDGET PARCELS PER PARCEL, BUDGET
Lewiir~ills ISD -/A 401000 $2.00 $43,800.00
Lake Dallas ISD $110100.00 50550 $2.00 $110100.00
{
Kruse I8D N/A 21800 $2.00 $5,600.00
I
Ponder YSD $30000.00 10500 $2.00 $3,000.00 j
Town Of Flower Hound N/A 9,300 $2.00 $18,600.00
Town Of Corinth $5,000.90 28500 $2.00 $51000.00
City Of Lake Dallas $4,660.00 2,230 $2.00 $4,460.00
City Of Hickory Creek $2,320.00 1,160 $2.00 $2,320.00
Town Of Bartonville $1,000.00 590 $2.00 $1,008.00
Town Of Double Oak $10000.00 500 $2.00 $10000.00
Town Of Ponder $10900.00 350 N/A $1,900.00
Lake Cities HUA $60000.00 31000 $2.00 $60000.00
TOTALS $34,880.00 690390 $1020880.00
~ r+rwrrrrr rwar •rrrrrrrarr
f
The jurisdictions are charged $2.06 per parcel based upon the
parcel count on July 25th when the appraisal roll is certified.
There is a minion annual charge of $1,000.00. The charge to
Lewisville 180 is reduced because LIED provides office space and l
utilities to the District. The District did not budget to
collect for Lewisville 28D, Krum ISO or The Town of !lower Hound
during 1990.
IM
I.
i
h
r
r Page 45
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
1991 TAX COLLECTION BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENSES
i
1990 1991
ACCT CLASSIFICATION BUDGET BUDGET
5117 -SALARIES $14 111.36 #
r $46,491.36
5119 SOcIAL SECURITY (RICA) $1,059.76 $3,558.43
5120 GROUP NEALTF{, DENTAL & LIFE INS. $0.00 $3,252.60
5121 RETIREMENT (TCDRS) $705.57 $2x428.10 I
5123 LONGEVITY PAY $0.00 $24.00
5124 AUTO EXPENSE REI?BURSEMEMT $4,300,00
$6,100.00
5125 11tl xml CONP $81.85 $297.54 i~
5126 GENERAL INSURANCE $0.00 $500.00
5127 INDEPENDENT AUDIT $300.00 510000.00
5126 LEGAL EXPENBE $0.00 $500.00
5132 PRINTING 541996.81 $13,184.10
5133 Offics SUPPLIER $1,230.00 $1x387.00
5135 OITICI 6QUIP11W 11AINT8NANCE $608.00 $1x145.00 I
f
5136 DATA PAOCMIM MAINTRNAIICI: $428.00 $1,186.47
5137 A'IOGIS?RATION & DUES $0.00 $120.00
5138 SCHOOLS, CONFBRENCES & TRAVEL,
$0.00 $930.00 I
i
5139 POSTACC & MIGHT $2x809.62 $12,975.93
5141 LEGAL NOTICES & ADVERTISTNG $21248.92 $2,998.56
CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE j
r
1
.
i
A
Page 46
i
DMMN CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT I
1991 TAX COLLECTION BUDGET
ESTIMATED EXPENSES
1990 1991
ACCT CLASSI=ICATION BUDGET BUDGET
-
5145 TELEPHONE ----$0.00 $3,000.00 }
i
5152 CONTINGENCY $1,500.00 $11000.00
5155 HISCUTANE0119 --$500.11 $500_11
-
TOTAL $34,SS0.00 5102,580.00
w..rwrwr urrrrrrrrw i
1
I
r
I ~ 1
f +
i
I i
I
I.
I
e
1
f•:w r.
P
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT Page 47
1991 TAX COLLECTICY BUDGET
MPLUATION OF EXPENSES
t
ESTIMATED
1991
ACCT CLASSIFICATION EXPENSES
%lwu
$46,491.36
5117 SALARIES ~
FOR SUPPORTING DETAIL SEE SCHEDULE 'SALARY ALIMTION"
ON PAGE 53.
$3x558.43
5119 SOCIAL SECURITY (rICA)
(A) FICA ON SALARIESA
V.CA
SALARIES X PATE TOTAL
(1,0765 $3,556.59
$46o491.36 ~
(B) rICA ON E.NGEVITY PAY '
FICA
TOTAL A
LONGEVITY X RATE
-
$24.00 0.0765 $1.84
TOTAL FICA + $3,558.43
5120 GROUP HEALTH, DENTAL & LIFE INSURANCE. . . . . . . . . $3x252.60
TAB{ GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE rOR 1991 IS ESTIMATED TO BB
$2,168.39 PER NW14YEE. THE TAX COLLECTION FUND WILL BE
CHARGED WITH HALF or THREE EMPLOYEES' HEALTH INSURANCE
EXPEIISE WHICH IS $1,084.2f PER DMBIAYDE (.5 X $2,168.39),
TMs OTHER HAtd WILL BE PAID BY THE APPRAISAL OPERATIONS. 1
t
ESTIMATED
ANNUAL
NUMBER Or COST PER TOTAL
ovLo Ef8 X DWLOYEi GROUP INS
3 $1,081.20 $3,252.60
I
1
1.- -7-
r
Ann,]
t
i
P
DENTON CWRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT Page 48
1991 TAI COLLECTION BUDGET
EXPLANATION OF EXPENSES f
ESTIHATED '
ACCT CLASMICATION EXPENSES
----~Nr (TCDRB) ~
5121 RET 1
Ir+ . . . . . . . . . . . $2,428.10
RETI-WORT EXPENSE I8 5.221 OF GROW PAY.
(A) TCORS ON SALARIESi ii
SALARIES x TCDR9 PATE TOTAL I
_ i
$46,491.36 0.3522 $2,426.85
(8) TCDRS ON LONGEVITYe
i{
LONGEVITY I TCDRB RATE TOTAL I
$24.W 0.0522
$1.25
1
TOTAL TCDRB $2,428.10
i
i
5123 LONGEVITY PAY. . .
$24.00 j
THCAS WILL BE THREE 1HKOYSE8 RECEIVING POUR NONTHB OF
LONGEVITY PAY AT 54 PER W M EACH. XW Ot Tic
LONGEVITY WILL 03 CHARGED TO TAX COLIICTIONS AND THE 1
Mn HALF TO APPRAISAL OPERATIONS. I
NUHBEER or
RATS PER LONGEVITY s !
ENPLOYBE3 X HONTH EACH PER NON"
3 $4.00 (A) $12.00
WNBIR OF LONGEVITY TOTAL i
HOMm X PER MONTH LONGEVITY
4 (A x $6.00 $24.00
NOTE, 501 of the longevity Pay per wrath (A) Is
charged to the tax collection fund.
I
F
DENTON CENTRAL. APPRAISAL DISTRICT Page 49
1991 TAX COLLECTION BUDGET
EXPLANATION Of EXPENSES
ESTIMATED
1991
ACCT ION
CL-I-----------
5124 AUTO EXPENSE RED}BURSDENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S6,100.00 1
THREE DiPLOYEES WILL RECEIVE $150 PER MOM EACH. AN
ENPIWEE'S HIUW6 IN EXCESS Of 300 MILES PER MONTH
WILL BE REIlBLWW AT THE RATE OT $.35 PER HILI.
TIRED
NUHB= Of RATE PER AMOUNT
DOLOYEES X MOM EACH PER NOR"
3 $150.00 (A) $450.00
-
TIRED rim
KWER AMOUNT ANNUAL
of Norm X PER MONTH AMOUNT
12 (A) $450.00 (B) $5,400.00 i
' VARIABLE EXPENSE VARIABIA
1QILWE X PER MILE • AMOUNT i
20000 $0.35 (C) $700.00
TOTAL AUTO REIMBURSEHWT ((B)+IC)) $60100.00
I` 1
5125 WORIM COW . . . . . . . . . t o o . . . . . . . . . 5297.50
WON=' COMP EXPENSE MR OrrICB PERBONNiL IS 5.64 PER
5100 OP AALW I
I` WORXERB' TOTAL i
MARIO Z CONP RATE r WORK= OONP ~
$460491.36 0.0064 $297.54 i
rrrrrr+ !
y
J
~r
t
k I
.R
r
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT Page 52
1991 TAX COLLECTION BUDGES'
EXPLANATION OF EXPENSES
i
MMATED
Ate. 1991 !
CLASSIS'ICATION EXPENES
I
5139 POSTAGE & TAEIGRT. $12,975.93
THIS ACCOUNT IJ! CHARGED FOR ALL MAILING & SHIPPING COST.
NUMBER OF AVERAGE COST TOTAL
ACCOUNTS X PER ACCOUNT POSTAGE
69,390 $0.1870 $12,975.93
5141 LEGAL NO7ICZS & ADVER'1'ISINO . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$Z,998.56
17M CODE MANDATED A88E88ING FUNCTION, WHICH COVERS Tm
TAX RAM BETTING PAOC'E88r REQU]3= CERTAIN ADVERTISING.
Lrl"CR OF COST PER TOTAL
JURI`dDICTION X 3URISDICTION ■ ADVERTISING
- - - - - - - -
12
$249.88 r
$2,995.56
f
5145
PELEPIMONE. $30000.00
THERE 18 TO BE TWO LOCAL AND ONE METRO LINE Ili THE
SOUTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE. THE BUDGETED AMOUNT CONSIDEM
ONE-HALF THE TOTAL EXPENSE.
5152 CONTINGENCY. . . , , , , . , , , , , , , r , $1,000.00
5155 MISCKJ AMM. $500.11
TOTAL 1991. TAX COLLOC TION EXPENSES $1028600.00
i
r DIRMN CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT Page 53
1991 TAX COLLECTION UUDGET
SALARY ALLOCATION
A114CATION
IRON 1991 OP 1991 TAX
APPRAISAL COLLECTION
OPERATIONS REVENUE PROPOSED
EXPENSE CATEGORY BUDGET TO SALARIES TOTAL
APPRAISAL SUPPORT SUPERVISOR - II $27,501.86 $3,312.12 $30,813.98
APPRAISAL SUPPORT SUPERVISOR.- II $15,624.00 5141880.00 $30,504.00 j
SOUTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE
APPRAISAL SUPPORT SUPERVISOR - I $24,251.92 $3,312.12 $27,564.04
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT $22,001.49 $2,662.80 $24,664.29
APPRAISAL ASSISTANT - I $13,439.03 $2,412.16 $15,851.19
APPRAISAL ASSISTANT - I $13,766.33 $2,412.16 $16,178.49
APPRAISAL ASSISTANT - It $9,975.00 $9,580.00 $19,475.00
SOUTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE
! APPRAISAL ASSISTANT - I $8,400.00 $8,000.00 $16,400.00
' . SOUTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE
-
°--------TOTALS $134,959.63 $46,491.36 $181,150.99
M~M~NeM ~,.NY~NN ~M~N MNM
I
14
s
4
i
I
I 1
Ile W
►Mr.r
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT Page 50
1991 TAX COLLECTION BUDGET
EXPLANATION OF EXPENSES
ESTIMATED
ACCT 1991
CLASSIFICATION EXPENSES
5126 GENERAL INSURANCE. . . . . . . . . $500.00
i
THIS IS AN ALLOCATED PORTION OF THE GENERAL INSURANCE
i
5127 INDEPENDENT AUDIT. $1,000.00
THIS 18 AN ALLOCATED PORTION OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDIT f
1 EXPENSE. 3
5128 LEGAL EXPENSE.
S500.00 '
FOR INDEPENDENT MAL ASSISTANCE.
5132 PRINTING $1311".10
THIS ACCOUNT 18 ENLARGED FOR Aid, PRINTING Of TAX SILLS i
AND DELINQUENT NOTICES.
NUM Of AVERAGE COST TOTAL
ACCO MRB X PEA ACCOUNT PRINTING
$9,390 $0.19 $3311".10
' NNN•gN
5133 OfriCE SUPPLIOS . . . . . . $I . . . . . . . . . .
$11381.80
RVCfIPTS/ CNLECMj GREEN BAR STOCKI DM OPEB A MSC.
NUM Or AVERAGE COST TOTAL
ACCOUNTS x PER ACCOUNT • PRINTING
0 4903"
+ 0.02 $11387.00
•N.••N I
I;
rav:..
r
FlliDENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT Page 51
1991 TAR COLLECTION BUDGET
EXPLANATION Of XXPEWSES
ESTINATED
1991
ACCT CLABffiPICATION EXPENSES
5135 0ffICE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,145.00
MAINTENANCE ON NORMAL OCPICE EQUIPMENT I8 CHARGED TO
THIS ACCOUNT.
2 EA. PRINTERS ! $206 EA. $824.00
2 EA. NAND READERS + $96 EA. r $196.00
1 EA. TYPEWRITER ! $50 EA. $50.00
3 CALCULATORS 1 $25 EA. $7500
TOTAL OPTICE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ■ $1,145.00
!
wrrrrur
3136 DATA PROCESSING HAI11TEMiCE. . $1,486.47
THIS IS AN ALLOCATED PORTION Or THE DATA PROCESSING
EXPENSE.
5137 REGISTRATION & DUBS. . . . . . . . . . . . $120.00
TIM (3) TARO RMISTRATI0NS ! $40 EACH r $120.00,
wowr I
5138 SCHOOLS, C0IRERMN & TRAVEL. $930.00
THIS BUDGE! "M 26 CHARGED MR Aid, TRAINIM COST.
F
NO. or COST PER TOTAL
COURSES X COUASS TRAINING
.__3 .$310.00 $930.00
wowr
I ,
3
i
}
c
CITY
COUNCIL
nor ae
p~~" t °~ppp
~OOG4
31.
I
f+• `r
i ~
r ~
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES/
July 10, 1990
The Council convened into the work session at 5:15 p.m. in the
Civil Defense Room.
Present: Mayor Castleberry: Mayor Pro Tem Boyd, Council
Members Alexander, Ayer, Gorton, Hopkins, and
Trent
Absent: None
1, The council convened into Executive Session to discuss
legal matters (considered action in Kelsoe vs. City, Richardson
Vs. City, and Morris Vs. City), real estate, and
personnel/board appointments.
2. The Council held a discussion and considered the Mayor
Budget Issues Report.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, outlined the format for the mayor
budget issues. The report outlined the policy issues which
staff perceived the Council would have to deal with in the
budget process in making community issue decisions with long
range effect, giving alternatives for dealing with the issues,
outlining the implications of the decisions, and making a staff
recommendation on the issues.
Harrell provided an explanation of the exhibits included in the
report. Budget priorities were outlined in Exhibit A. The
print out of revenues primarily from the General Fund was
provided in Exhibit B outlining previous year's actuals,
current budget, and an estimate for the next fiscal year. Each
individual department's expenditures out of the General Fund
were summarized in Exhibit C. supplemental packages were
listed and ranked in Exhibit D.
Harrell stated that the budget presented was a cut back budget 4
with no new positions. The cause of the budgetary problems
were twofold. The economic downturn in Texas had finally
caught up with property rate appraisals with an estimated lose
of approximately $1 million in property tax revenue as a result
of re-evaluations. The recond cause was the decrease in
i
projected sales tax revenue. {
The current budget showed a total revenue of approximately $125 f
million. The proposed budget attempted to keep the city's
financial integrity valid, concentrated on reductions without }
service cutback and attempted to track Council priorities.
Harrell stated that the first major issue concerned itself with
the level of the General Fund Reserve which was money set aside
for unexpected emergencies. Traditionally, the Council had a
asked for a fund reserve level of 8-10% of the total
expenditures of the General Fund. At the end of the current
h
h
I`
kk~
A i ra,-vo,~ l 1
T" City of Denton City Council Minutes
July 10. 1990
Page 2
budget year, it was projected that the city would have a
General Fund Reserve level of approximately 12%. The proposed
budget recommended reducing the fund balance to a 9.7% level
which would make approximately $575,000 available to assist in
balancing the proposed budget. Decreasing the reserve fund
level could have an adverse effect on the bond rating. Council
would need to decide if it were appropriate to use the funds
and decrease the fund reserve level or acquire funds by
" increasing the tax level.
i
Council Member Ayer questioned the impact that decreasing the
reserve level would have on the bond rating.
John McGrane, Executive Director for Finance, stated that bond
rating companies would look at long term trends and would
examine repeated use of fund reserves.
The second mayor budget issue dealt with revenues. Harrell
stated that property tax assessments from the preliminary tax
roll provided by the Denton Central Appraisal District had
decreased approximately $100 million. Because the city
experienced a substantial drop in assessed values from the
preliminary roll to the final tax roll during last year's
budgeting process, staff had attempted to take a conservative 4
approach for the proposed budget and anticipated another $50
million drop from the preliminary roll to the final tax roll
which was an additional 2 1/2i decrease in expected property
tax revenue. Assuming that the projections were correct, the
city would be operating with approximately $1 million decrease
in property tdx revenue which would need to be accommodated in
the proposed budget. The staff recommended increasin,, the
actual tax rate 30 making the tax rate 1.6483 per 1100
valuation which would actually be an effective tax decrease.
In order to bring revenues to an even level with the current
year, Council would be required to levy a 5 1/20 tax increase
which would be a 0% effective tax increase.
Staff proposed four alternatives. The first alternative 4 i
maintained a tax rate of (.6183 per $100 valuation and required
Council to find $578,00L, in additional revenues or reduce k
expenditures by that amount. With a 3t tax rate increase to
$.6483 per $100 valuation, the proposed budget balances. If
the tax rate were increased by 5 1/20 per $100 valuation to
1.6783 per $100 valuation, the Council would have an additional
$461,000 worth of revenue to be budgeted. The final proposed
alternative would raise the rate to the 8% rollback rate of
$.6969 per $100 valuation and generate $936,000 of new revenue. k
3
1
~r
r
Citv of Denton City Council Minutes
July 10, 1990
Page 3
Harrell stated that sales tox revenue had been projected at a
2% increase in the proposed budget. Each percentage of j
increase in the estimate would add an additional $51,000 worth y++
of revenue. If the projected sales tax revenue were cut back
to the current year's level of .6 of 1%, the proposed budget
would need to be cut an additional $71,000.
Other revenue sources for the city primarily were fines and
fees. The city had not had a comprehensive increase in fines
and fees since 1982. The staff proposed to supply Council with
a report on inflationary increases anda survey of other
Metroplex city charges for various fines and fees with a
proposal which would increase the revenue by $100,000.
Harrell stated that the next mayor issue dealt with service
issues. Although bond money had been authori2ed to build a new
fire station, the approximately $480,000 needed ftr operation
and maintenance costs of the facility when it opened was not
available. Council had made a policy three years ago to set
aside a certain amount of money each year to build up a reserve
fund so the fire station could be put on line without making a
major impact on the budget. Tough budgets have not allowed the =
fund to grow as rapidly as it had been hoped. The proposed r
bue4et recommended keeping the funding level at $150,000 for f
ar.ather year. The funding would increase the reserve totrl to e
$015,000.
Another major issue dealt with positions that were proposed to
be eliminated in the new budget. Harrell stated that the
positions proposed to be eliminated would be the Animal Control
Supervisor, Plumbing Inspector, Maintenance Worker at the
Airport, and an Intern for the Quest program. Staff would try
zo find an open position witb.in the organization to place
anyone currently holding a position proposed to be eliminated.
Il Council Member Gunton asked staff to research the effect on
city staff and resources of the county's proposal to make a
stricter leash law,
Council Member Trent questioned whether elimination meant leave
the position open or actually eliminate.
Harrell stated that effective OctoLer 1 the positions would be
totally eliminated.
In addition to elimination of some positions, the proposed 2
budget recommended that several vacant positions be held open
foe pact of the year in order to help balanct tho r'adget. The
positions which were recommended to be held open were Park
Planner, Recreation Specialist, and Civic Center Slrpetvisor.
The positions would remain in the budget but not be filled.
ji
F4
A
City of Denton City Council Minutes
July 10, 1990
e Page 4
,
Harrell stated that in order to not eliminate or hold open the
positions, an additional $137,700 worth of revenues would have
to be found.
Harrell stated that another major issue was salary adjustments
for city employees. Staff recommended that no across tho board
increases be granted and all merit increases frozen effective
October 1. With an estimated increase in health insurance
rates of approximately 174, no increase would in fact be a
decrease. Another alternative would be to reinstate the merit
increases which would require an additional $267,000 worth of
revenue. The second alternative would eliminate merit
increases and provide for across the board increases which
would require an additional $163,000 worth of revenue. The
third alternative would bring various job classes to minimum
market as determined by the market survey conducted by the
Personnel Department and allow normal merit increases which
would require additional revenue of $1,635,000.
Benefits adjustments was another major issue to be addressed.
The only benefit adjustment recommended by staff was an
increase in the fire pension program to the 9% level. The
benefit adjustment for the fire pension program was required by
State Law.
Harrell stated that another issue of concern was the human
services area. The committee recommended an increase of
approximately $21,900 over the current year level of funding.
Staff recommended a decrease of 10% from the current year. One J
alternativo would maintain the current level and would require 11
additional revenue of $11,280. If Council chose the Human Y
Services' recommendation, an additional $33,180 of revenue
would be needed. 1
Harrell reported that the next major issue was tax exemptions
for persons over 65. Council's goal had been to get the
exemption to $25,000 by adding $1,000 a year to the figure.
The proposed budget recommended increasing the exemption $1,000 j
bringing it to $19,000. If Council decided to skip a year and
remain at the $16,000 level, $14,627 would be available for
other purposes. If Council chose the alternative to increase J
the exemption to $25,000, $87,762 worth of new revenue would 11
need to be found.
The next major issue facing council would be the capital
improvements program. In 1986, voter's approved a $21 million
bond issue based on the fact that there would not be a tax
increase to finance projects based on a conservative growth
rate of about 8% in assessed value per year. Last year's
growth rate was about. .3 of 1%, and Council responded by 1
extending the program from five years to seven. The current 1
E;
y
j /
3
City of Denton City Council Minutes
d
July 10, 1990
Page 5
year's growth rate shows a 7% decrease in the amount of
property taxes. Staff recommended that no bonds be sold in the
next year and all building related projects (two recreation
centers, a library facility and a law enforcement center) and
indefinitely postpone the projects until there was an increase
In the growth rate. To keep all projects on schedule would
require an approximate 50 increase in the tax rate for debt
retirement purposes.
i
Street improvements were the number one priority for the
i Council. Martell stated that staff addressed the issue in the
proposed budget. A 20 tax increase would raise approximately
1370,900 in revenue. The current budget funded approximately
25 miles of street improvements over and above what was spent
on the capital improvement program. Staff recommended that an
increase in street improvements could most effectvely be used
in the paver/relay program. The additional tax rate revenues
would allow the staff to do seven additional miles of streets.
Harrell stated that there were several other budget items about
which Council needed to be aware. The proposed budget
recommended eliminatio,& of funding of half of the fees for
youth athletic officials and elimination of 1200,000 for
potential court judgments for Flow Hospital. The auto accident
liability program proposed in the new budget recommended that
any employee having an accident in a city vehicle, which was
clearly the employee's fault, would be responsible for 101 of
the cost up to 1250 per accident. It was anticipated that a t
150,000 savings would be realized for the i1k8urance fund.
Harrell stated that the roof of City Hall was in critical need `
of repair which would cost approximately 1133,000, staff
recommended in the proposed budget that when certificates of
obligation were issued for the lease/purchase of vehicles
' enough funds be included to finance the roof repair.
As mandated by charter, the utility budget was presented to
Council unchanged from the Public Utilities Board's
recommendation. No net new positions had been requested in any
of the utility funds. The electric utility recommended no rate t
increase, water utilities recommended an overall rate increase
of 12%, wastewater utilities recommended a 9% rate increase and
4 the sanitation fund a 6♦ rate increase. 4
Harrell statr-d that economic development was a very important
Issue for the city. The proposed budget would not help move
C the city towards the goal of economic development because of
the cut back In services, the hold on employee salaries, and
the cut back in capital improvements in an effort to be
responsible to the citizens and hold the tax rate down.
j
rr
City of Denton City Council Minutes
July 10, 1990
Page 6
2. The Council considered indicating to the Human
Resources Committee the amount of funds which would be
allocated to the Committee during the 1990-91 fiscal year.
LLoyd Harrell requested the Council to recommend that the Human
Resources Committee submit two additional budgets, one which
kept the allocation exactly the same as the current year which
was $112,500 and the second budget reflecting the 10% reduction
*,nj in services. The would give the Council additional
budgets
options when the issue was debated.
Council Member Hopkins recommended that the committee follow F
the recommendation of the City Manager.
Council Member Gorton recommended that the figure for the
recommendation be presented to show a figure including and
excluding the Community Food Room.
4. The Council was to hold a discussion and consider a
contract with College Station for the sale and purchase of
power and energy.
The item was to be considered during the regular Council
session.
The Council then convened into the regular meeting at 7:00 p.m.
In the Council Chambers.
Present: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Boyd, Council
Members Alexander, Ayer, Gorton, Hopkins, and
Trent
Absent: alone
k 7500 p.m,
1. The Council considered a resolution of appreciation
1
for Jim Darter.
The following resolution was considered:
L
I
/ .
-emir
1
City of Denton City Council Minutes
July 10, 1990
Page 7
RESOLUTION NO. U90-031h
Jim E. Darter
Lrm WHEREAS. JLo E. Darter, Captain. in the Fire Department,
is retiring after 20 years of dedicated service
to the City of Denton since his employment on
February 1, 1970; and
WHEREAS, during his career with the City, Jim E. Darter
has consistently maintained an attitude of
cooperation with and dedication to the stated
goals of the Fire Department of the City of
Denton; and 3
WHEREAS, Jim E. Darter has exhibited outstanding
expertise, dedicating much time and effort in
assisting with the work of the Fire Department
and has shown great spirit in encouraging
community involvement in the best interests oll
the citizens of Denton; and
WHEREAS, Jim E. Daxtec has always served above and beyond
the were efficient discharge of his duties and
has responded to his duties in a loyal,
trustworthy and extremely faithful manner, in a
spirit of cooperation with his fellow employees,
and in the best interests of the citizens of the
community= NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
That the sincere and warm appreciation of the
City Council be formally conveyed to Jim E.
Darter in a permanent manner by spreading this i
i Resolution upon the official minutes of the City
1 Council and forwarding to him a true copy hereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 10th day of July, 1990.
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
Attest:
Jennifer Walters, City Secretary
r
Approved as to legal form:
Debra Adami Drayovitch, City Attorney
By•
1
-low" ~1
i
~4 1 I
x
City of Denton city Council Minutes
July 10, 1990
Page 8
Gorton motioned, Boyd seconded to approve the resolution. On
roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye." Hopkins "aye," Gorton
"aye." Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye." and Mayor Castleberry "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Castleberry presented a copy of the resolution and a
a plaque of appreciation to Jim L. Darter.
2. Presentation of Yard of the Month Awards.
Mayor Castleberry presented July Yard of the Month Awards to
Shirley Goldfield, Paul and Paula Carpenter, Andre J. "Ftenchy"
Rheault, Mr. and Mrs. Charles Harbeson and McDonald'e.
3• Presentation of Governor's Community Achievement Award.
Cecile Carson, Administrative Analyst, reported that Denton was 4
the 1990 recipient of the Governors Community Achievement
Award. Ms. Carson and Jeannie Morrison of the Beautification
Commission were present in El Paso to accept the award on
behalf of the city from Mrs. Rita Clements. Bonnie Tyler and
Mary Ann Murkey of the Beautification Commission joined Ms.
Carson in presenting the plaque to the Mayor and council. ;j
4• Public Hearings onsider approval Aof ahe resolutione1of a the 1 City hearofingDentonand
Texas,l
designating certain officials to act on behalf of the City in
dealing with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department to
participate in the grant programs certifying the City as
f eligible to receive assistance under the programs, (Parks and
Recreation Advisory Board recommends approval.)
Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation, stated that
the request to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department asked
y for matching funds foi the development of the North Lakes Park
project. The prcject was part of the 1986 bond issue.
Approximately $800,000 had all ready been set aside for
development of North Lakes. The grant would match up to 1
1500,000 making a total of $1.3 million available for
improvements if the grant were awarded. The funds would be
used toward construction of four softball fields and five
soccer fields plus all the infrastructure and the trail system
which would go through the park area. a
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
No one spoke In favor.
No one spoke in opposition.
I
M
r
'r
S ~ I
r 1
City of Denton city council minutes
July 10, 1990
Page 9
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
The following resolution was considered:
RESOLUTION NO. R90-032 f
4" ' I
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, DESIGNATING
CERTAIN OFFICIALS TO ACT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY IN
DEALING WITH THE TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT
TO PARTICIPATE IN THE GRANT PROGRAMS CERTIFYING THE
CITY AS ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE ASSISTANCE UNDER THE
PROGRAMS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. {
Ayer motioned, Gorton seconded to approve the resolution. On
roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton l
"aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." {
Motion carried unanimously.
5• Consent Agenda
Council Member Ayer requested information about the ambulance
being replaced because it had exceeded the normal life
expectancy of 60 months and had in excess of 42,000 which
ueemed like relatively few miles.
i
John Cook, Fire Chief, responded that ambulances were kept for
five years, the first two in front line service and the latter
three on a standby basis. The unit to be replaced was the last
gasoline unit and would be replaced by a diesel unit. The
mileage was low compared to a passen,Ier car but for an
ambulance which runs very hard and very quickly, stopping and
i starting a great deal, the strain and stress on the chassis was
more than would be seen on an average unit. The ambulances
also had a tremendous amount of strain on the electrical system
because of all the equipment. 1
Alexander motioned, Ayer seconded to approve the Consent Agenda
as presented. Motion carried unanimously.
Consent Agenda .k
A. Bids and Purchase orders: j
1. Bid 01110 - Type I Ambulance
2. Bid 01118 - Truck Bede and Bodies
3. Bid 01122 - Air Switches
y
i
y
y
1
r
~W J
AI
1r
City of Denton City Council Minutes
r July 10, 1990
Page 10
6. Ordinances
A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or
services. (5.A.1. - Bid #1110, S.A.2. - Bid #1118, 5.A.3. -
Bid #1122)
The following ncdinance was considered:
NO. 90-094
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A
CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT,
SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF
FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
rG
Hopkins motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On `
roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton
"aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye,"
Motion carried unanimously.
B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance f
abandoning and vacating a portion of Mary Lee Street, a public
right-of-way located within the City of Denton, as more '
particularly described herein.
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 90-095
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS, ABANDONING
AND VACATING A PORTION OF MARY LEE STREET, A PUBLIC '
RIGHT-OF-NAY LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF DENTON, AS r
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN., AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
A ~
Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, reported Mary Lee Street was
located off Cooper Creek Road adjacent to the Safety Kleen
operations. Several months ago, Safety Kleen replatted the
entire subdivision which was reviewed by th9 Planning and
Zoning Commission and Council. The approved plat determined 1
that the city no longer needed the Mary Lee i1trest because
Safety Kleen was expanding into the areas that the street was4
originally built to provide access. The approval of the replat x
eliminated the need for the street. Official abandonment of a
street must be done by ordinance. „i
Council Member Boyd questioned if it had been a practise to
sell property in the past.
I ? I
I
I
Ile-
r, M1"14~ ~
1
fy
f
City of Denton City Council Minutes
July 10, 1990
Page 11
Svehla stated that normally there would be remuneration for the
city because there would be some value to the piece of ground.
When Safety Kleen replatted the piece of ground, they provided
the right-of-way which was required in the replat and also
provided additional right-of-way on Cooper Creek. Staff
determined that since the footage and valve were the same there
would be no need for remuneration. The rbandonment would also
allow Safety Kleen to proceed with an expansion project,
Hopkins motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On
roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton
"aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
C. The Council nonsidered adoption of an ordinance
of the City of Denton, Texas, approving a compromise settlement
and release of all claims for pending litigation between the
City of Denton and Dorothy Perry.
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 90-096 i~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS, APPROVING A 1
COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS FOR
PENDING LITIGATION BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND
DOROTHY PERRY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Alexander motioned, Ayer seconded to adopt the ordinance. On Q
roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton
"aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." r
Motion carried unanimously.
r
D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a contract between the City of Denton and Minor and
Minor Database Design for the GIS System.
i
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 90-097
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AND
MINER AND MINER, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. FOR THE
DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF DATABASE AND USER
INTERFACE SOFTWARE: AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF
FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. i
1
4
i
,r
t a,,
r
City of Denton City Council Minutes
a July 10, 1990
Page 12
Robert E. Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that
within the Geographic information System proposal was a
proposal to have Miner and Miner provide the Utility Department
with a database consulting service. The purpose of the
contract was for Miner and Miner to design the database
interface and entry system for GIS for electric, water,
wastewater and some land use items.
Gorton motioned, Ayer seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll
vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton
"aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
authorizing the Mayor to enter into an agreement between the
City of Denton and Deloitte 5 Touche as auditors for the fiscal
year ending September 30, 1990. '
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 90-098
i
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN i
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DFNTON AND DELOITTE 5
TOUCHE AS AUDITORS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING
SEPTEMBER 30, 1990, AND PROVIDING AR EFFECTIVE DATE.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that the issue had been
discussed at a work session. Council had made an informal
decision to proceed with the relationship with Deloitte 6
Touche for the current year's audit, al.d the ordinance
formalized the decision.
i
Council Member Ayer questioned if the general auditing r
standards were summarized in a form that would 1,e available for
council review.
John McGrane, Executive Dl.rector for Finance, stated that the
standards were set by varie;us boards, such as the Governmental
Accounting Standards Board, which made regulations on how
certain transactions or accoui.ting procedures should or should
not be done, and the document was g:lite lengthy.
Boyd motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll
vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton
"aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "Aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
r
F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
amending Section 11 of the franchise granted to Lone Star Gas
Company by Ordinance No. 82-56 to provide for an amended
franchise fee to be
paid by Lone Star Gas Company for the use
of the public streets, (Final Reading)
X3;,4
Abu]
1
City of Denton City Council Minutes
July 10. 1990
Page 13
NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DE'NTON, TEXAS, AMENDING
SECTION II OF THE FRANCHISE GRANTED TO LONE STAR GAS
COMPANY BY ORDINANCE NO. 82-56 TO PROVIDE FOR AN
AMENDED FRANCHISE FEE TO BE PAID BY LONE STAR OAS
COMPANY FOR THE US? OF THE PUBLIC STREETS; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Mayor Pro Tea Boyd questioned that a phrase in Section I
stating "tax, fee or charge of three percent (3t)" was actually
referring to a fee and not a tax or charge and may be more
accurate to amend the section to state a fee.
Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, stated that the "tax, fee or
c•oirge" language was in the current agreement and that phrase
was used in another section of the agreement which stated 1%
tax, fee or charge would be in lieu of any and all other i
charges that the city could collect.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that the agreement was
included as a major budget issue in last year's budget
discussions and Council had given approval to increase the {
franchise fee to 3%. John MCGrane, Executive Director for
Finance, had been negotiating with Lone Star in an effort to
make improvements in the franchise agreement including changing
the annual payment to a monthly or quarterly payment, Gone
Star's bottom line would be that they would agree to change the
franchise fee to 3♦ but make no other changes in the franchise
agreement which would still be in effect for another 12 years.
Mayor Pro Tom Boyd stated that there was a difference between
and tax and a fee, and the ordinance was discussing franchise
fees. By stating In the ordinance that it was a tax, the
Council would limit themselves. Boyd also questioned on what
basis the 3% charge was based.
City Attorney Drayovitch stated that the 3% was based on gross
receipts excluding industrial customers.
Mayor Pro Tom Boyd stated that most gas companies would argue
that the only thing subject to the franchise agreement would be i
the product. Auditors have argued that not only the product
should be Included but all services related to supplying the
servicei Boyd wanted clarification in Section IV concerning
the bass for the 3% fee using the original language.
It
,
1
yF 1.~
C
r.,
City of Denton City Council Minutes
July 10, 1990 1
Page 14 Jl
John McGrane, Executive Director for Finance, stated that he
was in agreement with Mayor Pro Tem Boyd. However, Lone Star
Gas was adamant in negotiations that the franchise agreement
went into effect in 1983 and the only means by which the
agreement could be changed was by mutual agreemo::t. Initially,
Lone Star had agreed to two changes. Through negotiations
staff had been unable to get agreement to two changes, Lone
Star would agree to change only the percentage.
Council Member Gorton left the meeting.
Council Member Trent stated that he was not comfortable with
the agreement.
Mayor Castleberry questioned that if any wording were changed
would the city have to re-negotiate the agreement.
0
McGrane stated that the existing franchise ran through the year
2002 and Any change would have to be mutually agreed upon y
between the city and Lone Star Gas,
Council Member Gorton returned to the meeting.
Council Member Trent made a motion to table the ordinance for {
further review and to be brought back for Council consideration
at the August 7th meeting. Boyd seconded the motion. On roll
vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton
"aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
7. Resolutions t
H
A. The Council considered approval of a resolution
authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement between the City
of Denton and the cities of College Station, Bryan, Denton,
Garland and Greenville, Texas for the sale and purchase of
3 wholesale electric service. (Public Utility Board recommends
approval.)
j
The following resolution was considered; i
RESOLUTION NO. R90-033
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE CITIES OF
COLLEGE STATION, BRYAN, DENTON, GARLAND AND r
GREENVILLE, TEXAS FOR THE SALE AND PURCHASE OF
WHOLESALE ELECTRIC SERVICE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
a
1
I
ARID
i
n cv~
FJ
g city of Denton City Council Minutes
July 10, 1990
Page 15
Robert Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that
negotiations had been ongoing with College Station since 1989
for the sale of capacity and energy to the City of College
Station. College Station had previously been a full
requirement purchaser of Gulf States Utilities. The contract
with Gulf States and College Station would expire at the end of
1991. As a result of the negotiations. TMPA had been
successful. Capacity sales for the project were estimated to
be between $10 and $11 million per year for a contract from
1992 through 1995 at which time College Station would be
incorporated into the next TMPA project. Nelson stated that
there were two components to the rate. One would be a capacity
charge of $11.78 per KW peak each month and the energy would be
sold at actual cost of energy generation plus .2 of a cent per
KWH. i
Nelson stated that the City of Denton's receipts from the sale
would be a net of approximately $973,000 in 1992. Tho Utility
Board had reviewed the agreement and recommended approval. The
other three cities had all ready approved the contract.
y
Council Member Ayer questioned why the other three members had
approved the agreement so quickly and the City of Denton had
taken so long.
j Nelson stated that revenues would be distributed based on
excess capacity. The City of Denton had the least amount of
excess capacity of the member cities. Staff's concern with the
agreement was based on the fact that accelerated growth in
Denton would deplete tho majority of the city's excess capacity
I thus eliminating capacity revenues.
11
Council Member Ayer questioned if there were a written ;
agreement with the other three cities agreeing to the
methodology of distribution of capacity revenues.
Nelson stated that the methodology was not in the contract. It
was an agreement between the four cities at Planning and
Operating Committee of TMPA plus the City Managers. l
g
Harrell stated that an agreement had been reached with the
electric directors of the four cities on the methodology of
allocating revenues which would be formally ratified at the
next TMPP meeting which the members were authorized to do under
the TMPP agreement.
I` Council Member Hopkins stated that she had some concern about
authorizing the approval of the resolution without a written
` agreement on the methodology.
II
.7 rte.
a
f.._ City of Denton City Council Minutes
s July 10, 1990
Page 16 i
Mayor Castleberry asked if the other three cities who had all 11
ready signed the agreement could proceed and leave Denton out
of the loop.
Nelson stated that the other three member cities could proceed
and Denton would lose approximately $1 million in revenue.
p Boyd motioned, Alexander seconded to approve the resolution.
On roll vote. Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,"
Gorton "aye," Ayer 0aye,11 Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry
"aye." Motion carried unanimously.
B. The Council considered approval of a resolution 1
authorizing the city Manager to execute a contract between the
City of Denton, Texas and the United States Army Corps of
Engineers to administer project lands and water areas for
recreation purposes and to operate, maintain and replace
recreation facilities. (Public Utility Board recommends
approval.)
The following resolution was considered: r
RESOLUTION NO. R90-034
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AND THE I
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS TO ADMINISTER
PROJECT LANDS AND WATER AREAS FOR RECREATION PURPOSES
AND TO OPERATE, MAINTAIN AND REPLACE RECREATION j
FACILITIES: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Robert E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities, stated that
within Denton's contract agreements with the Federal government
for the Ray Roberts reservoir, the city was required to pay for
one half of the recreational facilities on Ray Roberts and all
of the maintenance of the recreational facilities for a 50 1'eaL
I period of time. All properties bought in conjunction with the J
f Ray Roberts project were bought in the name of the Federal
government. The approximately 4600 acres involved in the
recreational part of the project must be leased to the cities
of Denton and Dallas so that they would have the legal rights
to operate the park facilities. In turn, the city pianned to
have a lease to the Texas Parka and Wildlife Department to
mana4a the operation. The document had been approved by the
Corps of Engineers, Texas Parks and Wildlife, the City of
Dallas, and the Public Utilities Board.
Gorton motioned, Ayer seconded to approve the resolution, On
roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton r
"aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry ".eye."
Motion carried unanimously.
it
4
r City of Denton City Council Minutes
July 10, 1990
Page 17
8. The Council was to receive a citizen report from Carl
Young requesting a waiver of fees and extension of park hours
for a girl's slow pitch tournament to be held in Fred Moore
Park.
The citizen withdrew his request.
9. The Council considered appointments to City of Denton I
Boards and Commissions. l
Boyd motioned, Ayer seconded to appoint the following
individuals:
1990 Reappointments and New Appointments
CITY OF DENTON BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS !
LIIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Jay Anderson Marcia Staff
Nancy Jane Hundley Ralph Morrison
Allie Miller E. Ray Griffin
John Dulemba
BUILDLHG_~LQE BOARD CABLE T.V. ADVISORY !OM
!r Isabel Miller Joe Holland
Greg Muirhead C. C. Sexton
Wayne A1len
f Ernest F. Simpson !
CITIZEN TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK !
{ SUPPORT COMMISSION GRANT COMMITTEE
t John Erwin Rey Trejo
Carl Guess Fred 11111
Mike Amador
1 Katie Flemming
f Jonathan Cott Rosemary Rodriquez
George Kay Curtis Ramsey
i
l i P
j
r
~I
M
City of Denton City Council Minutes
r July 10. 1990
Page 18
DATA PROCESSING ELECTF.ICAL CODE BOARD
ADVISORY BOARD
Robert W. Minnis Victor Sandoval
Bryan Scott Trenton Williams
Cengiz Capan John W. Hardinger
Nksa~
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE
John Kimsey Gloria Contreras
Joe Bailey Katy Dawson
Gerald Stone Sandy Ktistofersen
Jim Bezdck
Terry Garrett
LIBRARY BOARD ?ARKS AND RECREATION
Ed Coomes Roy Appleton III
Jean Schaake Catherine Bell
Margret Chrisman
PLANNING ANA ZONING PLUMBING AND MECHAN,iCAL CODE
COMMISSION
Jim Engelbcecht Richard Cooper
Fran Morgan Jeff Peploe
William Kamman Pete Work
PUBLIC UTILITIES TMP~
Roland Laney Tom Harpool
Gorton made a potion for a five minute recess. Alexander
seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
The Council recessed for five minutes. j
Mayor Pro Tem Boyd amended his motion to drop the Citizens t
Traffic Safety Support Commission from the list of
appointments. Hopkins seconded the amendment. On roll vote,
Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer f
"aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried
unanimously.
6
a
City of Denton City Council Minutes
July 10, 1990
Page 19
The Mayor made two appointments to the Denton Housing
Authority. lie appointed George F. Spuller and Charles Glasgow.
10. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager, re-appointed Frank Davila to a +
full three year term on the Civil Service Commission. I
Harrell stated that two dates had been set aside for the l
groundbreaking ceremony at Lake Lewisville for the installation
of the hydro electric projects signifying start of construction
at both Lake Lewisville and Lake Ray Roberts. The two dates
suggested and agreeable to the Corps of Engineers were 10 a.m.
on the morning of July 23rd or 10 a.m. on the morning of July
30th. Council expressed a preference for July 23rd.
11. There was no official action taken on Executive
Session items of legal matters, real estate, personnel or board
appointments.
12. New Business
s t
Mayor Castleberry announced that the tentative date for the '
I groundbreaking for Camping World was July 19th at 9 a.m.
13. The Council convened into the Executive session to
G ` discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel and board I
appointments.
I The Council reconvened into open session and took the following
,r
action:
r
A. Randall Boyd motioned, Hugh Ayer seconded to
appoint the following individuals to the Citizen Traffic Safety
Support Commission: 4
John Erwin, Carl Guess, Mike Amador, Jonathan Cott,
George Kay, and Dawn Baldwin
Motion carried unanimously.
f
The Council reconvened into Executive Session.
a
i
~ 1r
J
.x
City of Denton City Council Minutes
July 10, 1990
Page 19
With no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:45 p.m.
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
1
X
6
BETTY WILLIAMS
DEPUTY CITY SECRETARY a
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
5076M
i
;t
i
I
10
I
C
n
1
XMI:
CITY
4
COUNCIL
}
f
y
i
1
E '
1
jj
J
1111 A.
I o
a ~
°0acaaao~
r
r6F
z
r
( 1 VERIFICATION INC
\ AN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE COMPANY
August 29, 1990 ?j
5
Members of the City Council
City of Denton
Denton, Texas
Dear Sirs:
With regard to my request of the City Council on July
31, 1990 for time to research and develop information on the
impact of the rail abandonment to future economic opportun-
E sties, an interim report was drafted and attached for your
i review. I
Our study, conducted by an ad hoc group of concerned
citizens, was segmented into four areas of opportunity and
concern: possible use of the railroad as a shortline
freight hauler, tourist excursion, rapid transit passenger
service, and the impact on the Highway Department's project.
The study group counseled with the Chamber of Commerce, ;
City staff and other informed ',dvisors. At this time, we
feel we have sufficient information suggesting opportunities
in all three areas, and recommend the City urge the Highway
Department to seek an at-grade crossing of Loop 288, leaving
the existing track intact, preserving the rail corridor
right-of-way and M'
,Y ? protecting the CityIs options for future
4 public or private use of the line. With the exception of
questions concerning legal implications already presented to
the City staff, we believe this recommendation deserves your
generous attention and concludes our study of the matter.
,
Respectfully submi ed,
1
Matthew G. tis
MGS/sw
j i
i
r
REPORT
IMPACT OF CITY'S RECOMMENDATION FOR RAIL ABANDONMENT
ON POSSIBLE OPPORTUNITIES FOR FUTURE USE OF THE RAILROAD 1
EXECUTIVE SUNKARY:
In July of this year it became increasingly clear to us that
two distinct opportunities for economic development were seen to
be coming together in a conflict with the Loop 288 project
requesting abandonment of a portion of the railroad. That rail
line and the possible future opportunities for development
through its use became the subject of this study.
Our study focused on the options that may be available to j
the City Council and all possibilities for any economic iS
justification that could be identified to preserve the rail line.
As a result of our study, significant positive information about
possible future opportunities began to emerge and led us to our
recormiendation.
In recent weeks, we began dialogue with City Engineer Jerry
Clark, duing which we asked for his technical consideration and
evaluation of the feasibility of our recommendation. We submit
< for your review a summary of our findings.
RXCONNM2DATION:
We recommead the City Council consider a plan that would
legally and technically preserve the entire rail right-of-way,
including rails, while allowing for the highway crossing. Since
Loop 288 will not be identified as a high speed, limited access
highway at this point near Colorado Boulevard, we recommend that r
a design be created to allow for the crossing of the highway at
I the railroad at grade level. We believe this crossing could be
legally identified as exempt until rail use is re-established.
This would eliminate any requirement for vehicles to stop at the
railroad crossing and would also not require maintenance of "
flashers by the railroad or Highway Department.
1 ~ ~
i ,
R
rer.
d
C
SUN RARY OF FINDINGS:
. The KATY is a Critical, Direct Rail Link Between Denton and
Dallas.
Denton is currently served by two major trunk line rail-
roads, Union Pacific and Santa Fe. The Union Pacific main line
between Kansas City and Fort Worth passes through Denton. A
branch line known as "Denton Branch" begins in Denton at the foot
of Hickory street and runs to downtown Dallas for 36.6 miles,
paralleling I-35E. Currently, the first 9.2 miles from Denton to
Lake Dallas is not being used and is considered imbargoed for the
reason that no shippers or receivers of goods exist along this
section of the line.
The Santa Fe has a branch line passing through southwest
Denton from its main line in Krum. This line runs to Dallas for
53 miles by way of Lewisville, Plano and Garland. It has no
interchange points or connections with the KATY. In Denton it
presently serves Tetra Pak, Inc., Ben E. Keith, Union Cemp, and
the Miller Beer Distributor. The current operation of the KATY
provides service to several customers from Dallas to Lewisville
and as far north as Lake Dallas, which includes the Coors Beer
Distributor and Payless Cashways' warehouse.
shortline Freight Operations Could operate on This Section !
of Line. 1
Future possibilities exist on this line for shortline
haulers as the urban sprawl continues and we see more companies
and people moving to Denton. Vacant property exists all along
the railroad right-of-way and most is zoned industrial. Andrew
Incorporated and Boeing Electronics have plants along this route.
Currently, neither manufactures a product requiring rail, but as I
products change, or as rail service becomes available again, it
may make a difference whether these plants: decide to expand. 3
Several shortline operators have expressed an interest in
bidding on being DART's freight handler. obviously this leads to i
an interesting point, that when commuter service is started, rail
congestion on the southern end of the line in Dallas County may
require customers north of Carrollton be served from the north
end, by way of Denton. In order to perform that function, the
entire north end of the line would have to be intact and connect
with the main line.
I
j
2
awl
1
9
r
Casmuter Rail or Rapid Transit Service to Dallas is an
Opportunity for Future Use of This Line.
The most likely future use of this rail line would probably
be as a commuter rail service to the Dallas area. DART has
expressed an interest in acquiring an option on the line through J
to Denton, although at the present time it appears that the 1
owners of the rail line, Union Pacific, are not interested in
letting a ten-year option to DART without fair compensation. in
either case of freight or passenger service, the rail line would
have to be repaired and maintained as a high speed and safe
route. We have a number of unofficial estimates regarding repair
and conditioning costs and we have also found recommended
opportunities in funding those costs. They would range from
private investment by rail operators to grants and possibly
multi-community participation in bond issues.
Tourist Excursion Use of the Rail is a Real Possibility.
~ j
The possibility of a tourist or excursion operation from the j
metroplex cities to Denton could develop in the near future, 4
especially if the line is sold or leased to a Shortline operator.
Some of these types of excursion trains exist across the country. i
In Texas, the state Parks and Wildlife Department operates the
Texas State Railroad between Rusk and Palestine. Others operate
between Houston and Galveston and another one is a dinner train
from downtown San Antonio each evening.
The Tarantula Corporation of Fort Worth now operates a
freight shortline. They are planning to provide passenger
service between the stockyards area to the Will Rogers Coliseum !
and the Trinity Park Zoo. Steam engines and passenger cars have I
recently been acquired for these operation. A second project is 1
to provide excursion trains between Dallas and Fort Worth
starting next spring and on south to Granbury in the near future.
Preliminary discussions were held with this operator and it ? I
appears that the service could be expanded to other points
including, Denton if all conditions relative to the railroad and
the right-of-way could be met.
3
Railtex Incorporated, a San Antonio based short line
operator, is acquiring the Union Pacific line between Whitesboro
and Texarkana and ha£ begun discussions with the Southern Pacific
about their line from Denison to Plano. A dinner train operation r
has been discussed for this line as well. 3
' I
3 i
i
r
01
F
CONCLUSION:
Many things are changing in the railroad industry today, the
major railroads are going through a process eliminating branch
lines, selling or leasing them to new shortline operators who
operate at lower costs much like the airline industry has
commuter airlines feeding traffic to them. other railroad
rights-of-way are being abandoned across the country. These
rights-of-way are quickly encroached upon by adjacent property
owners, making recovery very difficult and expensive and too
often these corridors are permanently lost.
There are clearly four options for the City Council's
consideration of this matter:
1. Proceed on the original request from the Highway
Department requesting that the railroad abandon the portion of
the track necessary, leaving any future rail restoration, by way
of a rail bridge, underpass, etc., to railroad operators.
2. Take no action in this matter, leaving the decision to be
worked between the state Highway Department and Union Pacific.
3. Request the state Highway Department to proceed with the
i Loop 288 project by constructing an addition to the bridge over
the railroad as now exists.
4. Request that the Highway Department design the highway to
cross the railroad at grade level while legally preserving the
rail line intact for any possible future use.
As it appears, Loop 288 will eventually be rerouted around
this area, therefore significantly reducing traffic at this
location. our recommendation appears to be a good compromise and i
is the most cost-effective for all parties concerned. We urge
your thoughtfulness and diligence in this matter of interest and
importance to the future of Denton. i~
i
I 4
I,~
vp~
.r
f if
i 1
i
1
100
ui West Oak
0 S
~ Suite 204
MAIN STREET Denton, TX 76201
D E N T O N (817) 666-8529
August 30, 1990
Bob Castleberry
627 Grove
Denton, TX 76201
Dear Mayor Castleberry:
After careful consideration of the study information provided us
by Mr. Matthew Soitis regarding the possible economic impact of
the preservation of the former KATY Railroad right-of-way, it is
the opinion of - the Executive Committee of the Main Street Task
Force that the study group's recommendation to the City Council
is most appropriate and necessary to provide for the
preservation of the rail line.
We ask the members of the City Council to give careful
consideration to the recommendation.
Sincerely,
Cynthia Bell, Chairman
Main Street Task Force
wp
3013a
e
i4
Yyr {
i
{
CITY
N
COUNCIL l
3
4
s
z
t
v
q
I
i
lS ~O
cSi ~ s
o ~
S
O ~
ttGGO~
IMM
I
t .
1
0
r
i
2651L-1/3689
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT
FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES;
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE HATE.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equip-
ment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of a
state law and City ordinances; and
i
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has
reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or
services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for
the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the
materials equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted
herein; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. That the numbered items in the following numbered
bide or ma erials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the
"Bid Proposals" on file in the Office of the City's 'Purchasing
Agent filed according to the bid number assigned thereto, are
hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids
for such items:
BID ITEM
NUMBER NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
E 1139 All Leslie Pans romoanv $ 190000.00
1141 All Moore,Business Forme $ 63,000.00
1142 _ All Unitek, Inc. X10.000.00
1144 1-3 White Glove Janitorial 57.261.00
1144 4-8- Redlea Inc # 28.957.OQ
1145 All A&F Insulation X26,000.00 'i
1146 All Total Abatement systemA } 21.450.00
x i
r
y
I'
I 1
l
14'.]4!}~
FRr
1
D ~
SECTION II. That by the acceptance and approval of the above
numbers tlems of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer
of the persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to
purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance wi.Lin the terms, specifications, standards quantities
and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid
Proposals, sad related documents.
SECTION 7.11. That should the City and persons submitting
approve3- an3 accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to
enter into a formal written agreement as a result of the
acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager
or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute
the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that
the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions ti
specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained
in the Aid Proposal and related bid documents herein approved and
accepted.
SECTION IV. Thrt by thre acceptance and approval of the above
numbered of the submitted bids the City Council hereby
authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in
accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written 1
contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein.
SECTION V. Thgt this ordinance shall become effective {
immediately u`po`n its passage and approval. J
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of ,
. 1940. {
1
BOB CASTLSBMRY, MAYOR
~i ATTEST:
JENNIFER , UITY SECREI Y I
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCB, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
PAGE TWO
1
I1
1. J
Ole
DATE: 09/18/90
i
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
I
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
k SUBJECT: Bid #1139--Paper (Office/Xerographic)
RECOMMENDATION: Council approve award of bid to the lowest
bidder submitting pricing on all items, h
Leslie Paper Company, for an estimated
annual amount of $18,000. The contract
term is Oct. 1, 1990 thru Sept. 30, 1991 ?
with an option to renew for one year based
upon the agreement between both parties, j
SUMMARY: This bid is for the annual purchase requirements
of paper for office and xerographic uses.
Leslie Paper has bid items #14-17 as a 50% or
better recycled paper. Staff has also obtained
samples of item 41 in a recycled stock. These
samples are currently being used in test runs on
various copiers. One sheet is attached as part of
the background for this report, when recycled
stock is a suitable pro6uct for the job at hand,
it can be purchased from the paper vendor for 12%
above the cost of non-recycled stock. This low
percentage is available when the 40 carton minimum
order (any combination of stock) is met.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
Recycled Stock Sample
j
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: All Departments
FISCAL IMPACT: 1990-91 Budgeted office Supply(8101) Accounts
Resp fu;ls tte :
"Y V. Harrell
City Manager
Prepared by:
Name: Melanie A. Harden
Title: Buyer
. Approved:
Names Denise Harpoot
Titles Senior Buyer
a
.
F4
E
r
_ - _ ~ -JT~y,_WN~'~.~07J0~ ~ Ft O ~ m
t • • . . • . • W N H 0 ro
00 :A L7 m _
(D ry H d? O 'p '0 G~ W o w n CO 00 W- 3C
k4t ciga.M~ O aigmC~... - ro
N 00 n rt M 421 H 7C L< 9 m* a- k vi k x .n x
1-+
O, W. 0 r~ P f+ E,+ r., I ~J Cl)
d . ~ SU J „'7 '7 'C I .A F+ u W
F-1 F.E a a a . H
O C o w O C
~p a
0 N x ~n w p m C M
00 :st
n~ ro ~ ~ ~ in p N• N n
O ~3i tD ' a A R m \ b
E7 N k :m .J K N H
H PE W J b G
C+7 R
0 O
K n w
10
N N N01 p1 01 J F+ N oN_ 9
NNiA iA Ja ipA V1
R
n nnnn nnnnnnnn
O <n o
np
yq fAgO1gNl0qqE nnn rt
6]-t w
\ 4 G~ L !V 4 4 L V 1V V ro
m mmmm mmmmmmmmmm mmm
q A N
ON
li 6 M' A.
- a
~ n C to
a Ft w rT y O O
~ t7 tom"
f9 N N{n tANO NtANVSNtA Vf Vf 4f
q M b q b tp tp iO b\ W W W W W W W W W W (A t* 46 ry H
. . • , N w4EW Wl.JW WWW W to a* j
OooO JJJJJJ JJJJ W lJ1p
- ° VIVMNVtoinintow inoo
- ~ -
m A 1< o0 0
N~j7 ED d r o
n °O to z O
c ~
k !D a O N C ro
q K rt v O Vf NtA tAO w(4 mtR to V/Nto [A S/} i?VfN a Mz
H O F.• Ot1.0 WWWWWWW O
0 0 A
. N n Ja .A. i► iP A Ot O b H V] UI-f ,
N OL* ~n OO O.q.;o00 0000000 bW O
111N 00000 ofv OLnp
R rt
O O _ -
E I I ~ ~~~z `y'z~zzzxxzz ~N~
fD u. b\m m\h\C \m VIGiv, Q y
m mmmm mmm ~ W N
0 C)
n H
W Wtq I"~y
O O O n
t/
I
k
J
I
f a
f'
/
k
1
II 1
f I
1
THIS SHEET IS A SAMPLE OF THE RECYCLED STOCK
a
I
i
/
1
-
Ole-
E
I
rs 0N1P^G
t l
~ r
I` DATE: 09/18/90
fi CITY COUNCIL REPOT'.'
h TOE Mayor and Members of the City auncil i
FROM: Lloyd V, Harrell, City Managt_
i
SUBJECT: Bid #1141--Printout Paper i
RECOMMENDATION: Council approve award of bid to Moore Business
Forms for an estimated annual amount of
$63,000. The contract term is October 1, 1990
through September 30, 1991 with a renewal
option for an additional year based upon the t
agreement between both parties.
I SUM_*:ARY: Bids wore opened August 30, 1990. Twelve (12)
1 invitations were delivered and Pight (8) responses
were received.
Moore Business Forms submitted the only bid providing
for availability of all forms through one location AND
which complied with all bid requirements (i.e. sample
stock submitted for evaluation, prices quoted FOB
destination, and pricing firm for one year).
BACKGROUNDS Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: All Departments
FISCAL INIPACTs 1990-91 Budgeted Computer Paper (8130), Computer
Forms (8113), and office Supply (8101) Accounts
Respectfull submitted:
f
Lloy V, arrell
City Manager
Prepared bys
Name: M lanle A. Harden
Titles Buyer
Approved:
Names Den se Har of
Titles Senior Buyer
f
"All
3
V } H
r* ro Y H
J a, N W N H I FJ LT7 d
s z
M rn m 00 %D ~c A H~
b
Lzl O n n n n J n J n J d ro
bJ h1 ro. O N O N O N O N 0\ 0\ 0\ (D C F
r M M 0 X m x rA X m x to co 0 W rA 00 y y 0
N d "M w rr J rr J rr H rr H rr X rr X rr X n rr K
M \ a \ a \Y \H \m \00 \H K 0 H
ffJ/~~ W N rr rr rT a rr a IT rr n H N. w C Y
H SV H C' H 9 N `J F-• •.l .7 ,7 N v F+ y' s h7 O rr 0
',t7 N C t1 O 1 O 1 O N O H 0\ O\ 0 R
3 > 2 G •C C d C 1 C 1 C N C N C F-' P. S3
Y y I!1 rH~ 01 R O rr m a N 10 y a y a w 1 0 1-• a
0 M 0 0 b 0 7 N 0 H `J oD (D
O Xf H b 0
3 l7 O , PO
N
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
O . P • N ~i • W • U • O t r? ct
i . O • O • p . p r O • p • O rt
y • y • y • y • y • y • 01
- - ° ° ° - ~ - •
C
F. VIN O V1 co V) N N iP VF fD O
W . N • A . N • W C ~
O M O Z Qa wa 00w 00u( O y
70 N O U kD N N 9 (h K V7
C) a~ kD a,
I td
Y C C
w H H J h+ 00
F. d+. N N VI v ?A • N LD N • N O N (D 'T7 U1
to • W N w" r W U N • N O O H
K O M M OH Ur P00 030 kN•VI ON JJ 0. ~7JO
70 rn V] o. O• A. 8 J g U H %0 H N (n L-3
y C-- C
%Co
F.r 440. • Vf 00 VF • N Y N • N • VF fD to •Tj
• N JN • W pp . W Obw %DN Ha 1
M
[s7 O O N U w o m w O J to b Y Y O% U R+ ~1
~1 0
g. ~D. g. w :no. g.0 m V) rZ_•
V V Y 1 y f 1
,
N O~ N N ~D V} •O V! Q N (D ro '3'
• N O H • W Y N • N Y ro
w 2' k
O N 0 z w J U J 0w o p O -j ro H
\W t0 iD ~a% J co
3 N M RS t~+1
-C------ I
FA Q1 r .7 ~D
A Y Z z I N LD FN• N .1 H 01 N `J H H
w to 0% ?d N g P J of V5 N M Uf i
----------------N--------------- -C-yC---
J N • N • N • VF • Vf fD K N
z k z z z • N r H N N w N 00 N n H
O O M O \ \ rU wU NU Ow VIA. a IAA"
N Ul w bf J• g• 8• S• 3• 0
• tj J W N N J •1 9 rn Sd
U W O U l0 CA VI
z x z z z z z m omy
i m \W w c~ W o n c"
n ~
-
\ z z z z z m ro~
I
1
k~
,
V
e
P
Y
f DATEt 09/18/90
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
4 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
%COMO SUBJECT: Bid 01142--Portable Cellular Telemetry Equipment
RECOMMENDATION: Council approve award of bid to the low bidder,
Unitek, Inc., in the total amount of $10,000.
i
SUMMARY: This bid is for patient monitoring equipment to be
used by the emergency medical service personnel.
This equipment will enable the hospital personnel
to receive and monitor a patient's vital signs
while in the ambulance.
These units are mounted in the Mobil Intensive Care i
Units (Ambulances) and powered by the vehicle
electrical system. These units combine and allow
for the simultaneous transmission of voice and
(ECO) data to a base hospital from the ambulance
location. Access to the hospital is a single
cellular telephone call. Channel congestion and
radio interference associated with conventional j
telemetry are kept to a minimum.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
Memorandum--James Thomason
J
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Fire Department Emergency Medical Services
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for the purchase of this equipment will
come from Certificates of obligation previously
approved by Council for the acquisition of vehicles
and associated equipment. Accounts
710-004-0020-8707.
.
I
f
Fw,
~AIN ~wr■■■`
A ~I I Y Ib"WL
I
l
CITY COUNCILOREPORT
SEPTEMBER 18, 1990
I PAGE 2 of 2
1
Respectfu y submitteds
1
b1 07d r arrelI
` City M nager
Prepared bys
i
i
Names Denise Narpo 1
Titles Senior Buyer
I I
{
F ~ I
r I ~
1 a`
1 M
1 t
rr ro
z
0
t9 H
C Oi .y
tr' b f`3C H ~
m fD N Y C
~N y
IY ff m Y.+
i a b ~ ~n N
y ~ o ry
i "C K
~
,la p
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
rf H rD
R+ d M
O Aj y o "
H ~ O
O
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
N W
WOC
ILr A',' ~ NN ry ~~H
R 90 a
ID 0 " ~ Ga
c~n (
y
1 V. O
-
E
r
t
t
l
t
Fr)
r"
u
,r
t r
MEMORANDUM
,
t
TO: Denise Manning, Assistant Purchasing Agent a
FROM: James Thomason, Assistant Fire Chief 8#
DATE: September 10, 1990
SUBJECT: CELLULAR TELEPHONE BID
After reviewing the cellular telephone/telemetry bids, I recommend
awarding the bid o Unitek Incorporated.
awes R.
Thomason
JRT/bf
i
i
-
I
i
D
i f
~ r'''"• caw
CATF: 09/18/90
CITY COWICIL RrPORT
TOr Mayor And Xembers of the City Council
FROXt Lloyd V. Harrell, City ;Manager
SUBJECTr Bid #1144--Janitorial Service
R£COt42 I0NI Council approve award of bid to the lowest
bidders on the following groups of buildings:
1. City Hall $26,135.00 4, Animal Control S 2,090,00
2. Police Center $20,250.00
' 3• MLR Rec. Ctr. S11 376,00 S. Service Center $20,113.00
` S. Fleet t
WHITE GLOVE 57,7 1,00/yr 7. Traffic Control $ 1,084.00
` B, City Annex $ 4 553,00
I REDLEE, INC. 28,98. 0/yr I
The agreement will commence on October 1, 1990 and run through s
September 30, 1991 with a one (1) year extension if both parties
are in agreement,
SL'MARY S
Y
One lower bid was submit~ed on the
however, the bidder has chosen to declineLtheRawardtofnonlyntone
building as their bid was based on the assumption of providing servi bid onetheoServicelCenterrohowever, ilthey lhave wstated that should
the Service Center not be awarded to them along with buildings
4, 6, 7, and 8 it would become economically impossible to
service these four smaller buildings.
atgroupnandethbest erebynbenefitofrometnet$6613, savings lasngcompared
to the next low bid on the same grouping,
The Superintendent of Building operations is in agreement with this recommendation, andvnotesedthat
both have worked for the City and received good reports from the
references checked,
BACXOROUZiD: Tabulation Sheet
FROGAAK3 DEPARTt4E17T OR GROVPS AFFECTED: Building Operations,
Oepartmenta House n 8u idings Listed, and
i Citizens i Visitors to Buildings Listed
FISCAL IMPACTS 1990-91 Budgeted Funds fcc4P.espec r Building Maintenance
ly submi S
a e
Prepared byS er
-Aa . J-J:t,ld4--
Namer Mel n1e A. Harden
TitIeS Buyer
V APprovedS
den
Nnmer Denise Hatpo {
Tit1eS Senior Buyer
s
a
1
}
w
1
• W Y co J T tit A. W N
V V
- r .u - y _W
r ^r~^ rr 3k
- pv
C Vi y l M- ^i nj^
I > GI 7 H m ~i H C t+ y
9 C ~S M C ; H .C
r°a 0 0 H 2? x 2 ro (n C4
C) m n M
C
t7 5< O n C=J y 0
pp~~ n b~' H
j O C O\~+77 m O nMr~ ~V 0 H
C Z ~ N. N Ip :U
V1
Fa FJ ~ Y Y ~ ~
to to
n
l7 .A " z o
y
I I
O w py 1
4 <
h H H K H M M H
. . . . . . . . . . .
_.----N^. yam.-- r- ----m-
N N N N `~y
! 01 W O N N co iP O In J H H
M iP W " N N N VI t0 H
VI 42 O N O Ot J O N N to A
to N o w 7o W u1 0 0 O 0
. . M~
d N N Vt N " t1'I " H.
I
N H
N "Z N N N N <O N
m
z
fn to co g~y vii o 00 ~ r". e \ \ w M
, W W N M
J C W ~ J W ~
_ o
4. W ul N N N N CI r'A
k Ln 4 N N d l N O 01
• 9 Sys} ~ y ~
1Kfi • • • • • • • • XI H tq
l*1 M Q1 Lm 4 Ja O N W N N
V7 Iq O Oi O O In O tJl J to W
O N d O O O O m a 0
ry M ~
0 o d o O a o 0 0 O H 0
0 d o o O o 0 0 o t"
--V) <4 A N N p N N W W- w-
' O W O N N t0 V} N N h+ < "MA N
C~TJ O N N .r. zm J O , *00
to V7 N N w J O w w 0 V m (H] W ~../1
" W N J 0 w w N 4. O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o y
0 0 0 0 0 d d 0 0 0 ,
,I.
r
I
a
DATE1 09/18/90
r
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROMs Lloyd V. Harrill, City Manager
SUBJECT: Bid #1145--Tnstall Insulation and Lagging
i
RECOMMENDATION: Council approve award of bid to the lowest
bidder, A&F Insulation, in the amount of
$26,004.00.
SUMMARYs This bid is for services to re-insulate the turbine
units and install lagging. This vendor has performed
well on other jobs for Electric Production.
C
II~
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
Memorandum--Jim Thune
h
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMEN! OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Production
FISCAL IMPACT: 1989-90 Electric Production Budgeted Funds '
Account #610-080-0251-8339
I
I
Respectfull Submitted:
i
Lloy V.fparrell
City Man gar
Prepared by:
k
Names Den se Mar of
Titles Senior Buyer
i w
~wen~
it
+I i
o m FrFe~t
N F+ 3L [o d v '
z
N rrr rrr ,yH r
ry Y Y n
h r +
d H H 1-4 (D (p N ~
j q b
O C C d 1
tH r~r ra* ~ ~ N N
0 0 n n P
H R+ I ' I.A
3 'tea o `o
tiro" H 0 No z to
SC 40
~ q~ to P.
7, N to tq
II
II
II I
11 (h I co J%
C) f o ^D0 po 8,v
z u. I. W. z
Ilolo ~ o •
n ' _ n---
- it i
II t R+ O
i W II N t N N C
~ ii o l n o
----'I
jl
4
I
pE If
I
1
s
n
49149041
Y
[
TO: Tom Shaw
City of Denton Purchasing Agent
FROM: Jim Thune
Superintendent, Electric Production
a
SUBJECT: Bid Proposal 1145: Install Insulation and Lagging
DATE: September 10, 1990
i
Recommendation:
Regarding the above referenced bid No. 1145, the Electric
Production Department recommends accepting low evaluated
bid for this work. A d F Insulation provided a low bid of 3
$26,000.00. They most the requirement of j
Specification No. 90-13-08149402, and they have provided
t satisfactory service under previous contracts.
i 1
j Summary:
The contract is for services to reinsulate the turbines and
associated piping for Denton units one and two. This work is a k
result of overhaul inspections on the units which required 11
previous removal of asbestos containing insulation. Piping will
be reinsulated in non-asbestos insulation, and appropriate tagging
installed. The high pressure turbines will be insulated with
removable blanket insulation.
Funding for this work has been budgeted under 8339, General
Repairs.
~
Jim hone
e
JT:flc
CC: Ernie Tullos, Director, Electric Utilities
Bob Nelson, Executive Director, Utilities
i
i
i
4
~~rW ~ ~ 11I•
owl
a
DATE: 09/18/90
I
i I
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROMs Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
i
SUBJECTS Bid #1146--Asbestos Removal
RECOMMENDATION: Council approve award of bid to the lowest
bidder, Total Abatement Systems, in the amount j
of $21,450.00
14 1
l
SUMMARY: This bid is for removal of asbestos insulation from
the turbine units located at the Electric Production
Plant. This vendor has performed well in the past for
the City of Denton.
BACKGROUNDS Tabulation Sheet
Memorandum--Jim Thune
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Production
FISCAL IMPACTS 1989-90 Electric Production Budgeted Funds
Account #610-080-0251-8339
Respectf ly submitted:
Lloyd . Harrell
City Manager
Prepared by:
Names Denise Harp of
Titles Senior Buyer #
I
i
S
I
J
~f
o w w
N N st t7 O ~
f I'~.,Y I Ii , Y
r* rr
i N N +~~-qq3 b ZY
3 rr N
ty'r rr
i
9 of m
H Q1
M yy O ko s~
~3 H rD rD x eo N
z
I' I
I I r
N iii io NHyy
tl 11` 1t"
o io 00 rn
N u I~
11 O I Q O
II I
fi I
8 I
N II N I N o t H
I O II I N N trJ O r
w
'ydi H OD I b 1D
k II Vl I N N 'A
U1 II O I v1 v1 7.
II O I Q O c'
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
N 11 N 1 0 N
i+ 11 v1 I N N 9 H b a
z r
1 w co
K 11 oNi f ONO co ~
tl a, { W w
II 6 I O O
II
i
i
,a
09109003
TO: Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent
FROM: Jim Thuns,
Superintendent, Electric Prwiuction
SUBJECT: Bid Proposal 1148: Asbestol Removal
DATE: September 10, 1990
Recommendation:
Regarding the above referenced bid, the Electric Production I
Department recommends accepting low bid for this work. Total a
Abatement Systems provided a low bid of $21,460.00. They meet
requirements of the specification No. 90-12-08129001, and they have
provided satisfactory service under previous contracts. 9
Swanary:
k This contract is necessary to remove asbestos insulation from high
pressure turbine shells and associated piping on units one and two.
This type of work 1s regulated, and must comply with state and
federal guidelines. Contract abatement firms provide qualified
technicians, required mechanical equipment, supplies and disposal
to safely and effectively abate asbestos, Satisfactory results g
have been achieved through contracting for these services, and
contracting separately for abatement compliance and air monitoring.
Funding for this work has been budgeted under 6139, General
Repairs.
J
JT:flc
CC: Ernie Tullos, Director, Electric Utilities
I Bob Nelson, Executive Director, Utilities
r
,
f
'WIFE
til"~1Y~
7-M I
CI■ r
x
CITY
COUNCIL,
y
p
,cA~o i o
1 ~ 0
I y~ ~
O ~
1 I
10 i, t ~ oOC
OQ~QI: GG00~ ~
1
'I
ary of DENTON, TEXAS 215E. MCKINNEY/ DENTON, TEXAS 762011 TELEPHONE (817)56"200
MEMORANDUM
f
a
DATE: September 12, 1990
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
I,
SUBJECT: "Pool Ordinance" Re: Enclosure Gaps 4 j
r
Staff requests consideration of this ordinance be delayed until
October 2, 1990.
Since the Council meeting of August 29th, an issue has been
raised concerning the ordinance's requirement for existing pool
enclosures to "retrofit" the enclosures to have opening no
wider than four (4) Inches. We have determined that some 111
existing pool enclosures will not meet that standard. The
question is, is this a standard which may carry significant
costs for which very marginal gains in safety protection Is
accrued? Or, should existing pool enclosure gaps be
grandfathered?
The gap standard comes from the Uniform Bulldin Code Standards
g
about stair, porch, and balcony railing separation standards.
The Idea behind the pool enclosure and railing separation
standards is to preclude a small child from going through them. J
Our adopted UBC (1985 version) railing separation is six
inches. The 1988 UBC separation standard is also six inches.
We have been informed by UBC officials that the 1991 UBC
standard will be four inches. Metroplex cities have been using
or recently adopted the four inch standard. Some communities,
but not all, have ordinances which make the four inch
separation rule retroactive.
{
i
i ~
I+
1 I
Y Mayor and Members of the City Council
Page 2
With Council approval, staff will seek a recommendation from
the Building Code Board concerning the retrofitting of pool
enclosures with more than four inch but less than six inch
separation and return to Council on October 2nd for your
consideration.
Res tfully su matted:
7ra aced Cl y onsi P
Executive Director
Planning and Development
239lx ,
i
. I~
i
o~
C
L~
►
►
a
t
1
rt \
l Y ~
•:e r
ji
9 i
i
ORDINANCE NO.
I
AN ORDINANCE ARMING SECTION 5-176 of
(
A
BUILDING CODE) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF PT THEM CITY OF DENTON
RELATING
PROVIDING TOOR FENCING
PENALTY IN THE QUIIR~T9 FOR SWIMMING POOLS;
VIOLATIONS THMMoF1 PROVIDING FOR A S IIR LAMOUNT Or -00
ITY hU $500 PROVOV FOR
A REPEALING CLAUSEI AND PROVIDING FORIFEECTm DATE. IDING
THE COUNCIL Or THN CITY OF DENTON Unay ORDAINSI
3Z• That sac. 305 of section :.•-176 of Article V, 5 of the Chapteramended to dread asrtollows~ of the City of Denton, Texas is
I
section 1-174. Deletions and Amendments.
A new section 305 is added to said coda which shall hereafter
read as followst
t'
nee. 301. Emelosure.
I (a) Eacloaure. Every owner, lessee, tenant or other
person in possession of land upon which is situated a
I swimming pool, spa or hot tub shall at all times
maintain upon the tract, lot or premises on which the
swimming pool, spa or hot tub is located a fence,
wall, barrier or other enclosure that completely
I surrounds the swimming pool, spa, or hot tub. The
height of the enclosure shall be not less than sixty
(60) inches in height measured from the adjacent
exterior grade level with no openings, holes or gaps
large enough for a sphere four (4) inches in diameter
to pass through.
f (b) 4atos. Any gets opening 1
iii pool. spa or hot tub enclosure shall be not less~thiaann
f"-e ght (0) inches in height when measured from
the adjacent exterior grade level and shall be
equipped with self-closing and self-latching devices
designee to keep, and capable of hasping such gate
securely closed at all timer. when not In actual use.
hot tub~side odevicop f the when
shall located
bed attache eddinotplose
than forty (40) inches above grade when measured from
the adjacent exterior grade Level. It provided on the
device Mall be A miniiside of mu1 of tfiftya ofur (54)a inchq
above adjacent exterior grade.
M
6
f '
t
(o) Doers. A door in an exterior wall of a dwelling unit
which allows direct access to a swimming pool, spa or
hot tub shall have a latching device Installed on the
interior side of the door which does not require the
use of a key in order to exit the dwelling unit. when
more than one (1) latching device is provided, at
least one (1) such device shall be attached forty (40)
to forty-eight (48) inches above floor level, when a
single latching device is provided, it shall be
attached not less than forty (40) nor more than
forty-eight (46) inches above floor level.
An accessory building which fors part of the swimming
pool, spa or hot tub enclosure may have doors opening
on either the swimming pool, spa or hot tub aide or
the non-pool, spa or hot tub side, but not on both
sides.
(d) private or ssomipublic swimingopool,sepa or hot tub is
built after the effective date of this ordinance shall
coapiy with the provisions of this section before the
swimming' pool, spa or hot tub bacon" an attractive
nuisance and in all cases before filling the swimming j
pool, spa or hot tub with water.
(a) existing ewimsing Pool, spa or not sub anolosaress
(1) Each owner of an existing private or semi-
public swimming pool, spa or hot tub having a
depth twenty-four (24) inches or bore at any
point shall comply with section (a) hereof on
or before the 30th day of April, 1991.
i
(2) Each owner of a private or semipublic
swimming pool, spa or hot tub anolcosure shall
comply with the provisions of subsection (b)
L hereof on or before the 70th day of April,
1991 or whenever an addition, remodeling or
repair Bade to any structure on the mace
tract, lot or promises exceeds a valuation of
ten thousand dollars (110,000), whichever
occurs first*
arc~rr, a. That any person violating any P'ovision of this
ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a ens not exceeding
and distinct effo as is violated
shall 0 constitute a that
SACS
I
,
owl 1,
LLL
r
1 ~ S t.
S
t
Y
S_ECITION L, That if any section, subsection, paragraph,
sentence, clause phase or word in this ordinance, or application
thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by akny court
of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaininq portions of this ordinance, and the City
Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have
enacted such,resaining portions despite any such invalidity.
SE~oN iv. That the repeal of any ordinance or any portion
thereof by the preceding sections shall not affect or impair any
act done or right vested or accrued or any proceeding, suit or
prosecution had or commenced in any cause before such repeal shall
take effect; but every such act done, or right vested or accrued,
or proceedings, suit or prosecution had or commenced shall remain
in full force and effect to all intents or purposes as if such
ordinance or part thereof so repealed had remained in force.
sarrZoN y, That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen
(14) days from the date of its passage, and the-City secretary is E
hereby directed to cause the caption of thii ordinance to b*
published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the officia4
newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of thq
date of its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 4ay of , 1990.
1
SOS CASTLSMMY, NAYOR
j ATTEST:
4 JENNIFER iIALTERa, CITY WICAETARY
s
BY:
r
APPROVED As TO LNOAL NMI
DEBRA A, DRAYOVITCRR, CITY ATTORNEY
A tit h"
By:
swim. ord
S
{
pus 3
u
r ~ ~ l
f ~
I
Y
l
1
1
CITY
i
COUNCIL
i
,c
'A of Dt
s o% o
0 O
po tI}00~
0
j
i
0
CITY of AtNTON. TtXA* 215E. WK1NNEY I DENTON, TEXAS 762011 TELEPHONE f617) 5W4M
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 14, 1990
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
~i
FROM: John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance i
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF THE ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES FOR 1990-91
Pursuant to the discussion and consensus reached by Council i
during budget worksessions, the City Manager's proposed 1990-91
budget will be amended as illustrated in Exhibit "A" If adopted 1
by Council.
Exhibit "A" reflects General Fund technical adjustments i~
J: submitted for consideration on September 11th, as well as
Council initiated amendments to provide for a salary adjustment
in the amount of $462,430 and restoration of transportation and
social services to current levels in the amount of $18,600 as
recommended by the Human Services Committee
If adopted, these
expenditure adjustments and amendments would be balanced by a
$501,480 increase to current year ad valorem tax revenue, which
amounts to a tax rate of $,6551 per $100 of assessed value (,031
' under the effective rate).
Any additional changes Councll chooses to make prior to adoption
on September 18th will also be incorporated into the final
approved Annual Program of Services (budget). The attached
ordinance will serve to ratify approval,
ti
{ JFMcG:af~
Attachment
5396F
P/2 y
r..
" i
i
Mai
I
.w s.~
R
r
r
' ORDINANCE NO. _
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING TiiE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF D£NTON, TEXAS, FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR BEG%NNING ON OCTOBER 1, 1990, AND ENDING ON
SEPTEMBER 30, 1991; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, notice of a pttalic hearing on the budget for the City w
of Denton, Texas, .'or the fiscal year 1990-91 was heretofore
published at least fifteen (15) days in advance of said public
hearing; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing on the said budget was duly held on
the 4th day of September, 1990, and all interested persons were
given an opportunity to be heard for or against any item thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: s
SECTION I. The budget for the City of Denton, Texas for the
fiscal year beginning on October 1, 1990 and ending on September
30, 1991 prepared by the City Manager and filed with the City
Secretary, as amended by the City Council, is hereby approved and
adopted, a copy of which budget is attached hereto and incorporated
by reference herein.
SECTION II. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to
transfer the amounts of money for employee benefit and salary
adjustments as contained in the 1990-91 budget to the various
dRpartments.
SECTION III. That the City Manager shall cause copies of the
budget to be filed with the City Secretary and the County Clerk of
Denton County.
sEgTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval. ktk
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of September, 1990. f
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY 1
BY., APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
.
BY: Wes}---- y
EXHIBIT A
TECHNICAL ADJUSTMENTS AND AMENDMENTS
1990-91 PROPOSED BUDGET
r
NET
MTAM (WCREASE7
GENERAL FUND REVENUJi AMSTMENT DECASASE
Clurent Yew Ad Valorem Tex Revenue (581,460)
Current You Ad Valorem Tax Revenue (314,627)
Reserve for Appraisal District 300,000
Reserve for Elderly Tax Exemption 14,627
NET ADJUUMENT 0
xrx'd' Increases, in MisaUaneous FinestFees 100,000
Cemetery Fees 0,01
' Ambulance Service Fees (61,000)
Parking Fines (25,000)
Animal Pound Fees (1,775)
Anima! Gram Pick-Up Fees (4,600)
Restaurant Inspection Fees (1,010) 1
Orocery Store Inspection Fees (580) 4
Swimming Pont Inspection Fees (870)
Dayton Inspection Fes
Auto Pound Few (11500)
Solicitors permit, (248)
Mi,cellaneo n Permits (665)
Building Permila (290)
NET ADJUSTMENT (2,750)+
NET j
MAX 1NCRAWS `
O.~.L.FV".~ EXPENDITURES AJNUSTAMNT (DECRSAcl6I
DCAD Assessment 23,200
Fire Opu.tioas Fixed Asset, (28,000)
Fin Administration Services 20,000
NBT ADJUSTMENT 0
Airport Services (11,500)
Park Moinmew" Personal SerADW _ 11,500 M
NET ADJUSTMENT 0
Salary Adjwtmsat 462,430
Restoration of Social Suvias/Tnnrportatiaa k 5,800 ii
SPAN (Decrees) (600)
Friend, of the Family (Decreass) (1,300)
RSVP (Daman) (600)
Community Food Room (Add) 2,600
Parent's Aocnymotr (Add) 2,700
NET ADJUSTMENT 16,600
i
TOTAL NET GENERAL FUND ADJUSTMENT
Ole-
r`r I r
■
r
F iq
h
I'
CITY
~ ~ CI~UNCIL fi
r
i
i
j
C. 4t
a4t
I.MM A,
%
o
c {
teA+
MMM.
~ '~~GL'GCG d
i
t
f
--~--ter
ZAN!
i
f
l
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS 215 E. MCKJNNEY J DENTON, TEXAS 76201 ! TELEPHONE (617) 6688200
ei ~ k
MEMORANDUM j
1
DATE: September 14, 1990
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF THE AD VALOREM TAX RATS FOR 1990
The attached Ordinance will serve to adopt the ad valorem tax
rate for the year 1990. Also ?ncluded within the Ordinance Is
the recommendation submitted to Council in the Major Bud et
f Issues Report to increase the exemption of persons s xty- ve
years o~ageor older for the third year by $1,000 bringing the
! total elderly tai. exemption to $19,000.
Pursuant to preliminary consensus by Council on September 11,
1990, a tax rate of $.6551 per $100 of assessed value would be
required to support the amended General Fund portion of the
s 1990-91 Proposed Budget. If adopted, $.2170 of this rate could
be used to fulfill General Debt Service Fund requirements, and P'
$.4381 to provide for General Fund operation and maintenance.
The $.6SS1 tax rate is .031 under the effective rite of $.6553.
For your information, a tax rate worksheet is also attached
which Illustrates the tax rate calculation. t
JFMcG:af
S39SF
pZ ~ I
ff
I
i
7j
I
I
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE LEVYING THE AD VALOREM TAX OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, FOR THE YEAR 1990, ON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE
CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY 0?; JANUARY 1, 1990, NOT EXEMPT BY LAW;
PROVIDING REVENUES FOR PAYMENT OF CURRENT MUNICIPAL EXPENSES, AND
FOR INTEREST AND SINKING FUND ON OUTSTANDING CITY OF DENTON BONDS; r
PROVIDING FOR LIMITED EXEMPTIONS OF CERTAIN HOMESTEADS; PROVIDING
FOR ENFORCEMENT OF COLLECTIONS; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY
Ir~• CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
Denton, TexasIs and That by the Laws uofothey State h of Texas, Charter of the City of
levied for the year 1990, on all taxable property situated within
I the corporate limits of the City of Denton on the first day of
January, 1990, and not exempt by the Constitution and Laws of the 3
State of Texas or by Section II of this Ordinance, a zax of $.6551
on each $100 assessed value of all taxable property. ii
SECTION I~. 1hat of the total tax, $.4381 on each $100 of
assessed value shall he distributed to the General Fund of the City
I to fund maintenance and operation expenditures of the City.
I SECTIOjS III. That of the total tax, $.2170 on each $100 of
IIII~ assessed value shall be distributed to pay the City's debt service
aB provided by Section 26.04(e) (3) of the Texas Property Tax Code.
SECTION IV. That pursuant to Article VIII, Section 1-b of the
Texas Constitution, $5,000 of the assessed value of resident k
homesteads shall be exempt from city ad valorem taxes.
SECTION V. That pursuant to Article VIII, Section 1-b of the
# Texas Constitution, $19,000 of the assessed value of resident
homesteads of persons sixty-five (65) years of age or older shall
be exempt from City ad valorem taxes. O
SECTI*Ln. That for enforcement of the collection of taxes
j hereby levied, the City of Denton shall have available all rights J
and remedies provided by law. 1
BFSTQN VII. That if any section, subsection, paragraph,
sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application
thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court
or competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the City ' •
council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have f
enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity.
,
i
3
i
flr:a.r♦
I
SECTION VIII. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1990.
s
r
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST: t
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY k
BY: _
n
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMe
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
i
BY:
i
i
Page 2
i
t i
.E
i
Ile --7
Y
CITY OF DENTON 1990-91 BUDGET
TAX RATE CALCULATION WORKSHEET
I
PROPOSED BUDGET EFFECTIVE RATE (Given)
' S27,208,178 $0.6553
ADOPTED BUDOBT CURRENT RATE (Given)
27,709,658 $0.6!83
NEEDED REV (Variable) NEEDED RATE (Answer)
501.480 $0.6551
TAXABLE BASE (Given)
2,036,603,285
NEEDED RATE (Answer) PERCENT UNDER EFFECTIVE RATS
0.655100 -0.0305%1
TAX REVENUE DIS"PRIBU'TIONIRATE CALMILA ION
GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND REV (Ohm) 4,286,800
GENERAL FUND REV (Variable) 8,154,932 - 1,678+ NEEDED REV I
DEBT SERV REV + OEN FUND REV n ((ASSESSED VALUE 1100) 0 TAX RATE) 97% I
4,286,500 + (8,154,932. 1,678 + NEEDED REV) u ((2,036,603,155 1100) 1 TAX RATE) 97% 1
12,440.054 + NEEDED REV . (20,366,033 $ TAX RATE) • 97%
12,440,054 + NEEDED REV - 19,735,052 4 TAX RATE I
i
12,941,534 a 19,755,052 • TAX RATE
TAX RATE a 0.6551
Ii INTEREST AND SINKING RATE r 02170
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE RATE 0.4381
~II
PRd JFr 6.6551 I
((TAX4KS VALUE / 100) • TAX RATS) • 9718 r TOTAL REVENUE
((2,036,603,285/AV) •.Qil1) •97X 11,941,534
I,
~ i
i
i
I
a
CITY
COUNCIL
t~
% ar
A.
o
o
O
~aooeaaano
11
a
~t 1
affM
x
September 18, 1990
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR AND NIEMBEkS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
i
FROM: R.E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities
RE: CONSIDER ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING NEW WATER GATES
AND SLTTINU AN EFFECTIVE DATE:
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utilities Board, at th.ir meeting of August 19901
recommended to the City Council approval of the proposed Water Rate
Ordinance.
r ~
SUMMARY: F
+
The City Councli revie+ved this Item at their work session of September 4, a
1990. The analysis of the existing water rates Indicates 1991 revenues of
$11,473,882, and expenses of 12,3u2,736, for u loss of $8889854. With +
rates as proposed In the attached document, water revenues would be # +
Increased by 9.97%% resulting in a net gain In the Water Department of
$163,262, or an approximate margin of 1.3%. The proposed new water
rate would increase the bill of an average 10,000 gallon per month
customer from $25.25 to $27.400 for an Increase of $2.15 per month.
f After developing total water system rate requirements, Individual ±
customer rates were developed by distributing Identifiable costs to each
customer class. The outcome of the cost of service analysis and the
corresponding customer class rates are detailed In Exhibit 11.
Based on the proposed customer class rates, a comparison between the j
current rate and the proposed rate is provided In Exhibit Ill. Examples of
how the proposed rates will effect the customer's bill have been provided
In Exhibit 1V, Provided in Exhibit V Is the comparison of Denton's I
proposed rates with other cities. r
E!
FISCAL SUMMARY:
Based on the proposed 9.97% Increase in water, the projected revenue
would cover the total expenditures and produce a net gain of $165,262 In
water. r
I
P
yP r:
A
Page 2
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT'S UR Gl>WUPS AFFECTED:
Citizens of Denton, Denton Municipal Utilities, General Government
Departments, Customer Service, Legal Department, Public Utilities
Board, and City Council.
Kespec Sly s'Jbm1?t9d,
*dV. ar rell/7-
City Manager
Wae for
Financial Administration
jE;rN=or tment of Utitities
Lxhiblts I Budget/Rate Study Financial Analysis
11 Customer Class Rates
Ili Current vs Proposed Rates
IV Effect of Rates on Customers Sills
V !fate Comparisons with other Cities
Vl Ordinance
VII Minutes PUB Meetlnig of 8/2/90
1
a
b8HUr1-2 3
1
y
OWN] !A
4
4
4-
EXHIBIT I-WATER
eIDaIT/tntt aTUOt VIXMIAL AIALYSIS
!IDOL'!
r M MIT LATI em t
1. BIYINV!!1 1
APOATINO SLY 110,400,421 610,3121011
NON-0p RKV 6691000 901,000 e
TOTAL UVIMI6 $10,9090421 6111473,012
r 11. QPMITVII6
4 4 OPOATINO LIP 170906,701 /1,111,791
NON-0P !I1 41038,000 4,669,90
ptpRICIATION LIP
(M80LISAL!) 0 91,044
TOTAL LIP $11,9440701 112,36!,136
PIT OAINALOM) (19161!90) (I6M,N4)
W/O LATL IMAN
NIT 0A1N/(1.OLL} 1166,!6!
M 9.97% LA" I NCIIML
I
i
u
I
1¢{F r+
l
r,
~+C1e r .
i
t
61UII/IT It
Cityy of Denton Yates Utility
Development 09 Revenue Target$
DNCr p~ t~~ ee •nt a COeNrc a • vernNAt Aaea Is
0ta
Ras FlnlshedSystem
y
FT 1901 Revenues 4,975,911 4+303+190 41430 379,471 170,190 %0,543+011
Proposed 1 Increase 9.371 17.001 10,00% 1.71% 3.001 9.97%
tilt Rev 1 Proposed Rates 5+441#164 5,044+357 S,117 249s M 153,034 11,593,147
• Par the purpose of this summary the Coemercial Rate class X11
includes the rate Class Metered rater from Fire Hydrants
1121,
rr
I
MET it
city of Denton Yestewter Utility
Dewlorant of Revenw Terifete
DINFIFFION •rerrerra•rarrar•rrsrreaeeeeereaeeea•• /Tom
R90 COW PRIMAT WIN WNttp, YllOt=OA 00V'P
ry MI, RevenuN 7#!01#141 30514#170 17S,436 11/#Oll 70#!11 !43#731 S7#Sf7 i#411,143
1 ,reposed % [*area 0 13.00% 5,751 75,000 71,50% 71,406 7401 4.001 9,44%
7171 Revenge i 7#11!#5{! 3#7!0#7!1 71!#7!5 11{#1!7 H#771 700#711 50#!01 1#004#314
Proposed Retee
1
owl
;j nirv r~ V
R I'
r
F
EXHIBIT III 30-J,il-90
City of Denton Water Utility
Current vs. Proposed Rates
Rate Schedule Proposed Current
Rates Rates a
aa~' Residential Rate WR
3/4" Meter $7.40 $6.75
1" Meter 8.75 8.00
1 1/2" Meter 12.50 11.30
2" Meter 14.00 12.75
First 15,000 gal 2.00
15,000 - 30,000 1.85
gai Summer 3.00 2,7g
All over 30.000 gal Summer 3.75 3,30 p
15,000 - 30,000 gal Winter 2.00 1,85
All over 30,000 gal Winter 2.00 1.85
Commercial/Induatria% Rate WC 1
3/4" Meter $13.75 514.26
1" Meter 17.26 15.50
1 1/2" Meter 20.00 18;00
2" Meter 22,25 20.00
3" Meter 63.00 58.00
Meter L05.00 95.00
Meter 135.00 120.00
8" Meter 153.00 137.00
Commodity Charge/1000 gal
Commodity Charge/1000 gal 2.20 2.00
Sales for Resale Rate WWI/WV2
Minimum Charge WWI $155.00 1165,00
Minimum Charge WW2 $170.00 170.00
WWI Demand Charge per 1,040gal 20.00 20.00
WW2 Demand Charge per 11000gal 27.40 27.40
Commodity Charge 0.90 0.85
Over 3,0009000#al NA NA
Intra-Govt Finished Water Rate WO
3/4" Meter $11.25 $11.25
1" Meter 12.50 12.50
1 1/2" Meter 16.50 16.50
2" Meter 17.60 17.50
3" Meter 53.60 53.30
4" Meter 85.00 85.00 '
6" Meter 107.00 107.00
8" Meter 125.00 126.00
Commodity Charge/1000 gal
Commodity Charge/1000 gal 2.00 1.90
1
I~
I
I
I
I 4s.
f
EXHIBIT III 30-Jul-90
City of Denton Water Utility
II Current vs. Proposed Rates
Rate Schedule Proposed Current
Rates Rates rr~
Intra-Govt Raw Water Rate WCU
Minimum Charge $130.00 $113.00
Commodity Charge/1000 gal 1.20 1.10
Standby Fire Service Rate WF
d" Line $30.00 $23.00
Line 40.00 33.25
Metered Hydrants Rate WFH
Customer Charge Minimum 623.00 $22600
Commodity Charge/1000ga1 2.20 2.00
r:
1
r
1
H
I
11 ti
I
\ I
4ti
I
I
IhhII
I r ~
EXHIBIT IV
Y RESIDENTIAL WATER TABLE 1
IMPACT OF RATE IMCRRASR ON RESIDENTIAL
CUSTOMERS USINU 3/4" METBRS
k
SMALL CUSTOMER CURROPT PROPOSED
---RATES
-..TEE.
A) 79600 GALS/MONTH t
1. FACILITY CHARGE
$6.75 $7.40
2. VOLUME CHARGE 813.88 116.00
3. TOTAL 140.83 -$22.40
4. CHANGE
a) In Dollars 11.78
a) In Poroent seals
AVERAGE CUSTOMER
E) 100000 GALS/MONTH
1. FACILITY CHARGE 14.76 17.40
1e VOLUME CHARGE 114.60 110000
Se TOTAL $R6.26 $27.40
4. CHANGE
)
a) In Dollars 11.16
a) In Perasnt 8.61% J'
;i
1
I
1
dooe
Nx1~ 3
a 4
EXHIBIT IV
RESIDENTIAL MATER AND WASTEWATER TABLE 2
-----ter-------------------------
CURRENT PROPOSED
SMALL CUSTOMER RATES RATES
~r x7 WATER I
A) 71500 GALS/MOM WATZR
1. FACILITY CH1,102 $6.15 $7.40 3
2. VOLUME CHARGE $13.66 $15.00 j
WASTEWATZRI
69000 GALS/MOM DISCHARGE
1. FACILITY CHANGE $3.00 $4.00
2. VOLUME CHARGE $6.00 $9.00
3. TOTAL MATER & WASTEWATER $31.63 $35.40 M
s
4. CHANGE
a) In Dollars $1.71
a) in Percent 6.49%
{
1
I1~I AVERAGE CUSTOMER
I
MATERI
A) 10,000 GALS/MONTH vi%TER i
t 1. FACILITY CHANGE $6.75 $7.40
j 21 VOLUME CHANGE 316660 $20.00
WASTEMATERt
6,500 GALS/10M DISCHARGE
1. FACILITY CHARGE 33.00 $4.00
2. VOLUME CHANGE $6.75 16.75
3. TOTAL MATER A WASTEWATER 136.00 141.18
4. CHANGE
a) in Dollars 13'15 j
a) In Percent 6.94x.
a
EXHIBIT IV
RESIDENTIAL-MATER_AND MASTIVATIO TASLE 6
-
I' it----- `
i
CUR"" P&OPOSIM
LARD! CUSTOMER yiATlB `RATRs
,rr
k
MATERI
A) 40,000 GALS/NONTB MATEk
1. FACILITY CBARGE ;6.76 6-1.40
674.00 160.00
2. VOLUME CSARGE f
" I
MAaTEMATER3 l
10,000 GALS/WM DISCSARGS 1
1. FACILITY CUAROE $ R . 00 00
1. VOLUMN CHARGE 61 ! . 00 I116 a, Oa
3. TOTAL MATER 4 MASTEMATE! 6!6.76 IlOd.4O
4. CHANGE
a) In Dollars i7.16
7
In percent .76E
a)
I 1
I
1
I
EXHIBIT IV
COMMERCIAL WATER TABLE 4
MONTHIY IMPACT OF RATE INCREASE ON COMMERCIAL CUSTOMER
CURRENT PROPOSED
RATES RATES
-
1. FACILITY CHARGE $15.50 $17.15
a
1. VOLUME CHARGE $80.00 $88.00
-
3. TOTAL $95.50 $105.15
4. CHANGE
a) In Dollars $9.75
a) In Percent 10.111
USAGE DATA t
A. Faciiity charge based on 1" mater.
B. Volume charge based upon 40,000 gallon consumption
i
y
.r
r
' ...a.. ans;47
r.
7
71
EXHIBIT V
r WATER RATE COMPARISON WITH OTHER CITIES TABLE 5
RESIDENTIAL
AT 35,000 GALLONS
rarrrrrrarttrarrt
AT 10,000 AT 150000 SUMMER WINTER
CITY GALLONS GALLONS MAY-OCT NOV-APR
I. ARLINGTON $22.80 $32.30 $70.30 $70.30
v 2. CARROLLTON $?,8.28 $41.63 $95.03 $95.03 E
3. DENTON
a) Currant rates $25.25 $34.50 $92.25 $71.50
b) w/rats inc. $27.40 $37.40 $101.15 $77.40
4. LEWISVILLE $27.95 $38.20 $79.20 $79.20
COMMERCIAL TABLE 6
AT 400000 AT 100,000
CITY GALLONS GALLONO
P.I - - - -
1. ARLINGTON $79.80 $193.80
}
2, CARROLLTON $114.48 $207.66
3. DENTON
a) Current rates $94425 $214.25
b) With rate incr $103.75 $235.75
4. LEWISVILLX $69.45 $212.43
I0
~ r,
i
vl Nt O 1
i..
r
6
PUB Minutes EXCERPT FROM PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
Page 4
MINUTES 8/2j90
I
1. REVIEW PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE 1991 WATER AND WASTEWATER
RATE STUDIES.
Nelson presented overviews to the Board showing a deficit of
over $888,000 in water, and over $506,000 in wastewater for
1991 at the present rate structure. The Board had given
instruction to allow a 1-1/2% margin between revenues and
expenses in rate increases. Careful review and calculation
of all proposed revenues and expenses resulted in the
recommendation of a 9.97% increase in water rates and a
"s4 9.46% increase in wastewater rates for 1991.
LaForte felt this was better than the expected 12% increase
previously anticipated due to the EPA requirements for the
building of a new wastewater treatment plant.
Nelson Informed the Board that the UTRWD anticipated payment
of ;704400 will help our debt service considerably. Nelson
4 noted that revenue from pro rata had been eliminated from
the budget.
Thompson asked about pro rata. Nelson informed him that the
question was addressed to City Council. Our City Attorney,
as well as TML's, agreed that the 1987 legislative action
regarding pro rata established that we can not charge for
pro rata. The City Coun preferred not to go to the
expense of asking the Attrrn^p General for his opinion.
Harrell questioned about funds going back into General
Government from Utilities relative to the Utility basis
rates being charged to Corinth and LCMUA. Nelson explained
that the Utility will continue to pay General Government a
6% return on investment for all rate base. However, the
utility cannot pass this -lost directly onto the wholesale
customers because of Texas Water Commission regulations
regarding fair rate of return. However, the Utilities will
charge the wholesale customers 1.5% over imbedded interest
rate on rate base assets, plus .64%, which is what a private ;
utility would pass on as the cities ad valorem tax rate,
plus an at.nount equal to 4% of gross revenues as a street
rental fee.
i.
He noted that this may not totally capture the 6% return on
investment the Utility must pay, but when revemies for
depreciation are taken into account, wherein depreciation s
rates are over 20 years but asset may last 35 years, the
utility is probably about breaking even. He noted that the 3
Texas Water Commission probably would not allow any greater I
rate of return if our rates were challenged.
i
C
PUB Minutes
Page 5
Nelson reviewed the current vs the proposed rates
residential and commercial, and the impact of the rate
increase on the small, average, and large customers.
Thompson asked if action was requested. Nelson said no, the
Utility needed guidance from the Board with regard to any
changes in the proposed rate Increases.
Member Frady left the meeting at this time for another
appointment.
LaFurte moved and Laney seconded the proposed rate increase
for 1991 and going onto City Council for their approval.
All ayes, no nays, motion carried.
i
li
Meeting adjourned at 1:45 p.m. Next regular scheduled meeting
was set for Auquat 15, 19901 at 5:30 p.m.
I
F`
0
t- PUBMIN.807 !i!
.
I
101
E
C
t
P
N0. _
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SCHEDULE OF RATES FOR WATER SERVICE;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the Rate Schedules for water service as
prov a or n Chapter 25 of the Code of Ordinances, are amended
to read as follows:
WATER RATE SCHEDULES PAGE
4
WR Residential Water Service 2
WRN Residential Water Service Not Connected to Sewer 6
WRW Religious Worship Water Rate
8
WC Commercial/Industrial Water Service Rate
WCN Commercial/Industrial Water Service Not 10
Connected to Sewer
12
WGI Government Sprinkler Irrigation Rate
WW1 Water Sale for Resale to Municipal Corporations,
Water Districts e 1,m 19B6 1 Entities
E
By Agreements Prior to J 14
WW2 Water Sales for Resale to Municipal Corporations,
Water Districts & Other Governmental Entities 15
By Agreements After June 1, 1966
lr
WG Intre-Governmental Sales of Finished Water
WGN Intra-Governmental Water Services Not Connected 19
I to Sewer
j WGU Intra-Governmental Sales of Untreated Water 21
22
WF Standby Fire Service Water Line
23
WFH Metered Water from Fire Hydrant
24 ~
WRE Extra-Jurisdictional Residential Water Service
,
WCE Extra-Jurisdictional Commercial & Industrial 26
Water Service
27
Special Facilities Eider
4
r
1
rout)
v
SCHEDULE WR
RESIDENTIAL WATER SERVICE
LEffective
APPLICATION
Applicable for single family residential service, and
individually metered apartments or mobile homes or multi-family
facilities with leas than 4 units.
Not applicable to resale, temporary, standby, or
supplementary service except in conjunction with applicable rider.
NET MONTHLY RATE
(1) Facility Charge Billing Per 30 Days
3/4" meter 7.40
1" Meter 8.75
1-1/2" Meter 12.50
2" Meter 114.00
(2) Volume Charge Rate Per 1,000 Gallons
s
WINTER SUMMER
Billing months of Billing months of
NOV through APRIL MAY through OCT
0-15,000 gals 2.00 2.00
15,000-30,000 gals 2.00 3.00
Over 30,000 gals 2.00 3.75
MINIMUM BILLING
Facility Charge
PAYMENT
J Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
P
1
PAGE 2 j
i
1 '
3
1
I
Pu'PN; ,
P
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
bill ased on 12
(a) billings afor nnually, Facility charge shall be b
Formula:
Actual da s in read in eriod x customer charge
-says
(b) Billing for the xate; used shall be based on 30 days per t
month to determine the million gallon consumption to be
charged to each rate block.
Formula: r
Actual days i~n reading eriod x GAT is n000tgallone in rate "
---3u ays lock
1
t
i
i
t
1
t
w I
J
a
,II
PAGE 3
I
I
II
I y
i
t
SCHEDULE WRN
RESIDENTIAL WATER SERVICE NOT
CONNECTED TO SEWER
ective C7T0T-
k
APPLICATION
Applicable for single family residential service, and
individually metered apartments or iaobile homes or multi-family
facilities with less than 4 units, where the metered water is not
returned to the wastewater system for collection and treatment;
i.e., lawn sprinkler or septic system.
Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to
temporaryy atandby, or supplementary service except in conjunction
with applicable rider. ?
I NET MONTHLY RATE
(1) Facility Charge Billing Per 30 Days
3/4" Meter 7.40
1" Meter 8.75
1-1/2" Meter 12.50
2" Meter 114.00
(2) Volume Charge Rate Per 11000 Gallons
WINTER SUMMER
Billing months of Billing months of
NOV through APRIL MAY through OCT
E
0-15,000 gals 2.00 2.00
15,000.30,000 gals 2.00 3.00
Over 30,000 gals 12.00 13.75
MINIMUM BILLING
Facility Charge
PAYMENT
r
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
I
{ PAGE 4 fi
{
~e
Ole-
l
I
t
tc.
gr~.wr~
4
SPECIAL FACILIl'IES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service raquirements shall be provided subject to the
f
special facilities ricer.
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 E
billings annually.
Formula:
Actual da s in reading,_ period x customer charge
J days
(b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per
month to determine the million gallon consumption to be
charged to each rate blocV.
Formula
f Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE
30 days per 1,000 gallons in rate
block
~ Y
I
3
i
i
PAGE 5
F
l
r eiSN11~
i
1p
X y
r
SCHEDULE WRW
RELIGIOUS WORSHIP WATER RATE
LEttective
APPLICATION 1
Applicable to all facilities used primarily for religious
worship, served by a single water service line through one meter.
i
Not applicable for resale service in any event, nor to tempo- }
nary, standby, or supplementary service except in conjunction with }
applicable rider.
4
NET MONTHLY RATE
(1) Facility Charge Billing Per 30 Days
3/4" Meter 7.40
1" Meter 8.75
1-1/2" Meter 12.50
2r' Meter 114.00
(2) Volume Charge Rate Per 1,000 Gallons
WINTER SUMMER
Billing months of Billing months of
NOV through APRIL MAY through OCT
0-15,000 gals $2.00 2.00
I 15,000-30,000 gals $2.00 3.00
Over 30,000 gale $2.00 13.75
MINIMUM BILLING
Facility Charge
PAYMENT
j Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the ,
special facilities rider.
PAGE b
i
3
I
r
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12
billings annually.
i
Formula: i
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
ays
(b) Hilling for the water used shall be based on 30 days per
month to determine the million gallon consumption to be
charged to each rate block.
Formula
Actual days in reading period x pGe i1,000 gs rate
nnate block inRATE
ays block }
E
x
3 1
T
~ ! 1
~ f
ll F J 1
k1
~J
I
PAGE 7
i i
J
11RA•. SIR
t
SCHEDULE WC
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL WATER SERVICE RATE
[Effective 10/1/901
APPLICATION
Applicable to all commercial and industrial users, or other
provided otherwise at one pint classified under this ordinance. For
and measured through
all water users
one meter.
Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to
temporary, standby, or supplementary service except in conjunction ;
with applicable rider.
NET MONTHLY RATE
4
(1) Facility Charge Billing Per 30 Days
'r
344" Meter 15.75
1' Meter 17.25
1-1/2" Meter 20.00
2" Meter 22.25
3" Meter 63.00
4" Meter 105.00
6" Meter 135.00
8" Meter 1153.00 i
(2) Volume Charge $2.20 per 1000 gallons
MINIMUM BILLING:
Facility Charge
¢ PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
4 SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider. i
PAGE 8
r ~ l
f
i
r
r
I
j PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
` (a) Billing for the Facility charge shell be based on 12
billings annually.
Formula:
Actual da s in reading period x customer charge
aye
(b; Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days pet c
month to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to
I~ each rate block.
Formula:
Actual da a in reading eriod x GAL in rato blocK x RATE
30 days per 1,000 gallons in rate b
block
t
t
I f
5
L
1.
.i'
PAGE 9
II
i'
li
i
r
SCHEDULE WCN
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL WATER SERVICE
NOT CONNECTED TO SEWER
`-i f-fective
APPLICATION
Applicable to all commercial and industrial users, or other s
water users not otherwise classified under this ordinance. For
all water provided at one point of delivery and measured through
one meter where the metered water is not returned to the waste-
water system for collection and treatment; i.e., water used in
production or irrigation or where wastewater flow is measured
separately.
Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to tempo-
rary, standby, or supplementary service except in conjunction with
applicable rider.
NET MONTHLY RATE
Facility Charge Billing Per 30 Days
3/4" Meter 15.75
1" Meter 17.25
1-1/2" Meter 20.00
2" Meter 22.25
3" Meter 63.00
4" Meter 105.00
6" Meter 135.00
8" Meter 1153.00
(2) Volume Charge $2.20 per 1,000 gallons
MINIMUM BILLING:
Facility Charge
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. i 1
SPECIAL FACILITIES i
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special faacilities rider.
PACE 10
i 1
1
I:Yt.
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill-
ings annually.
Formula:
1
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
ays
(b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per s
month to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to
each rate block.
Formula:
Actual days in days in reading eriod x GAL in rate block x RATE
UCays per 1,000 gallons in rate
block
1
3
z
nd
1
ft
PACE 11 !
E
I
4
1j
i
i
t
Roff~
F}1
d
I, M y r • .r, rrw
4I
SCHEDULE WGI
GOVERNMENT SPRINKLER IRRIGATION ".ATE
ect ve , - s
APPLICATION
Applicable to sales of finished water for median irrigation
purposes to all City cC Denton Departments and accounts supplied
at one point of delivery and measured through one meter. `
y
Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to tempo-
rary, standby, or supplementary service except in conjunction with
applicable rider.
i
NET MONTHLY RATE
t
(1) Facilit Char a Billin Per 30 Days
(A) Meter Charge
3/4" Meter 16.75
1 Meter 18.60
1-1/2" Meter 24.50 s"
2" Meter 128.25
(B) ~rinkler Charge
Per 100 square feet $ .90
(2) Volume Charge $2.00 per 1,000 gallons
MINIMUM BILLING
Facility Charge
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not aid
within 1 c
5 etend p
er
days from date of issuance, j
SPECIAL FAC?LITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
yy i
1
i
{
r I
PAGE 12
0
i
i
1
1
PRORATIOII.OF UTILITY- BILLS
(a) Billings for the Facility Charge shall be based on 12
billings annually. '
Formulae r
Actual des in reading period x Facility Charge
(b) Billing fox the water used shall be based on 30 days per
month to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to
each rate block.
Formula:
Actual days in readin eriod perA in rate blocinxrRATE 1,000 gallons a
block.
a
PANE 13
F Y
1
•
I
1
( I
I
SCHEDULE WWI
(Effective 1-1-911
i
WATER SALE FOR RESALE TO MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS,
WATER DISTRICTS, AND OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES
BY AGREEMENT EFFECTIVE PRIOR TO JUNE 1 1986
~ Yy t
APPLICATION
i Applicable to all water sales contracts with municipal corpora-
tions water districts, or governmental entities made prior to i
June 1, 1986, for the purpose of providing water for resale to the
public.
Not applicable for temporary, standby, or supplementary
service except in conjunction with applicable rider. f
MONTHLY CHARGES j
(1) Facility Charge $155.00 q
f ~
(2) Volume Rate $ 0.90 per 1,000 gallons
(3) Demand Rate $240.00 per 1 *000 gallons
*ANNUAL CHARGE
Y
(4) Readiness to Serve Rate $ 0.4838 per 10000 gallons
*As determineQ' in the last month of each Contiactual Water
Year. The annual charge, if any, shall be included on the
monthly billing for the next July following the end of the
Water Year for which it is charged, and shall be billed and be
1 payable in accordance with the monthly billing provided for
below.
PAYMENT
Denton shall render bills on the tenth (10th) day of each
month. Bills shall be due and payable when rendered. Bills are
considered delinquent if not aid by t 1
p he twenty-fifth (25th) day
of the month. There shall be a five percent (51) or five hundred
dollar ($500.00) charge whichever is less, added to the bill if g
not paid by the twenty- A fth (25th) of the month.
t
EFFECTIVE DATE y
The charges stated herein shall be applied to all water
services supplied after January 1, 1991. Until January 1, 1991,
applicable charges will be determined by Schedule WWI of Ordinance
No. 89-123.
PAGE V:
Ole
~u..•' WNL4'1~ .
F
7
SCHEDULE WW2
[Effective 1-1-913
WATER SALES FOR RESALE TO MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS,
N 1986 NTITIES
WATER DISBTYR ANDEMENT OTHER AFTER GOVERNM1
APPLICATION
Applicable to all water sales contracts with municipal corpora-
tions water districts, or governmental entities made on or after
June 1, 1986, for the purpose of providing water for resale to the
public. 1
Not applicable for temporary, standby, or supplementary service }
except in conjunction with applicable rider. €
MONTHLY CHARGES
1
(1) Facility Charge $170.00
(2) Volume Rate $ 0.90 per 1,000 gallons f
i
(3) Demand Rate $328.80 per 1r Ulons
*ANNUAL CHARGE
(4) Readiness to Serve Rate $ 0.4838 per 1,000 gallons
*As determined in the last month of each Contractual Water
Year. The annual charge, if any, shall be included on the
monthly billing for the next July following the end of the
Water Year for which it is charged, and shall be billed and be
ayable in accordance with the monthly billing provided for
below.
PAYMENT
Denton shall render bills on the tenth (10th) day of each
month. Bills shall be due and payable when rendered. Bills are
considered delinquent if not paid by the twenty fifth (25th) day
of the ciontb. There shall be a five percent (5z) or five hundred
dollar ($500.00) charge, whichever is leas, added to the bill if
not paid by the twenty-fifth (25th) of the month. If not paid by
the last day of the month, there shall be an additional interest
charged on the unpaid balance, equal to the auction average rate
quoted on a bank discount basis far a twenty-six (26) week trea-
sury bill issued by the United States government, as published by
the Federal Reserve, for the week prior to the date such bill or
bills are delinquent, or ten percent (10x), whichever is less.
PAGE 15
s
F R
r4` n
f f
I ~
s"
f
f EFFECTIVE DATE
The charges stated herein shall be applied to all water
services supplied after January 1, 1991, Until January 1. 19911
applicable charges will be determined by Schedule WW2 of Ordinance 4
No. 89-123. E
1
z
1
PAGE 16
i
u
f rrX:oQ
t
h 4 t SCHEDULE WG
M INTRA-GOVERNMENTAL SALES OF FINISHED WATER
ec ve
APPLICATION
Applicable to sales of finished hater to all City of Denton `
Departments and accounts supplied at one point of delivery and
measured through one meter.
tee' Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to tempo-
rary, standby, or supplementary service except in conjunction with i
applicable rider. 1
NET MONTHLY RATE
- a
(1) Facility Charge Billing Per 30 Daye
3/4" Meter 11.25
V Meter 12.50
1-1/2" Meter 15.50
2" Meter 17.50
3" Meter 53.50
4" Meter 85.00
6" Meter 107.00
8" Meter 1125.00
(2) Volume Charge $2.00 per 1,000 gallons
MINIMUM BILLING:
Facility Charge
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill-
ings annually.
PAGE 17
t
Ile-
a.
r
i
Formula; I
Actual days in reading period x facility charge
3 ays
(b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per
month to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to
each rate block. 3
• j
Formula:
j Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block x ELATE
ays per 1,000 gallons in rate
block
f
i
I
i
i
PAGE 18
r
}
Y
r
SCHEDULE WGN
i
INTRA-GOVERNMENTAL WATER SERVICES NOT CONNECTED TO SEWER
kEffective
APPLICATION
Applicable to sales of finished water to all City of Denton
Departments and governmental agencies supplied at one point of
delivery and measured through one meter where the metered water is
not returned to the wastewater system for collection and treatment.
Not applicable to resala service in any event, nor to tempo- j
rary, standby, or supplementary service except in conjunction with #
applicable rider.
NET MONTHLY RATE
(1) Facility Charge Billing Per 30 Dare
3/4" Meter 11.25 '
1" Meter 12.50
1-1/2" Meter 15.50
2" Meter 17.50
3" Meter 53.50
4" Meter 85.00
6" Meter 107.00
8" Meter 1125.00
(2) Volume Charge $2.00 per 1,000 gallons
i MINIMUM BILLING:
f
Facility Charge
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to most
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
i
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
f
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill-
ings annually.
i
I
f PAGE 19
kk,
I
I'll- W
~r
t
r
r
Formula:
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
30 ays
f
e
(b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per E
month to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to
each rate block.
Formula:
Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE
3 -ays per 11000 gallons in rate
block
I
1
1
I
h
rry
I
I
I I
PAGE 20
N
1
f
1.
P
i a
R
i'
t `
SCHEDULE WGU
I NTRA- GOVERNMENTAL SALES OF UNTREATED WATER
ect ve
APPLICATION
Applicable to all City of Denton Departments and accounts for
untreated water supplied at one point of delivery and measured
through one meter,
Not applicable for resale except in conjunction with applicable
rider.
NET MONTHLY RATE
(1) Facility Charge $130.00 per 30 days j
(2) Volume Charge $ 1.20 per 1,000 gallons
MINIMUM BILLING Facility Charge
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the s
special facilities rider, ,
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12
billings annually.
Formula: V
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
30 ays
(b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per
month to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to
each rate block.
Formula; z
Actual days-in reading period, x GAL in rate block x RATE
aY® per 1,000 gallons in rate
block
PAGE 21 ,
j
1
yp.., MIA"" i
rEra.. '
7
F
y,
T
SCHEDULE WF
~STANDBY FIRE SERVICE WATER LINE
"LEffect ve
i
1
APPLICATION
Applicable to commercial and industrial users for unmetered
fire service water line to serve only sprinklers or other private
fire fighting equipment.
Not applicable for resale in any event.
NET MONTHLY RATE
Facility Charge Billing Per 30 Days
i
6" Line 30.00
8" Line 40.00
MINIMUM BILLING Facility Charge
PitYMENT
Bills ire due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 13 caiendar dLys from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILiTTES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
j j special facilities rider.
J Ij PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12
billings annually.
Formula:
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
-III mays
PAGE 22
V
7j
S
E~
}l
9
P
I
SCHEDULE WFH
METERED WATER FRON FIRE HYDRANT
ec ve
APPLICATION
Applicable for all water taken through a fire hydrant or other ?
direct distribution line source at one location for private or
commercial use not associated with fire fighting.
t
DEPOSIT $650.00
User shall lace a deposit for each use of each of the City's
hydrant meter(s) needed. Deposit to be returned when meter is
returned and final bill is paid. y
NET RATE
Volume Charge: $ 2.20 per 1,000 gallons
Volume use shall be computed by subtracting the meter reading
at time of customer paying deposit and receiving meter from meter
reading upon return of meter times any applicable multiplier.
FACILITY CHARGE $ 25.00 per 30 days j
INSTALLATION CHARGE $ 41,30 per meter per installation i
PAYMENT ~
Sills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
i
1
PAGE 23
i
r
3
r
r ,
I
SCHEDULE WRE
RESIDENTIAL WATER SERVICE OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS
JEffective
APPLICATION
sae Applicable for single family residential service, and
individually metered apartments or mobile homes or multi-family
facilities with lase than 4 units outside the corporate limits of
the City of Denton.
i
NET MONTHLY RATE
i
(1) Facility Charge Billing Per 30 Days
3/4" Meter 10.00
1" Meter 11.00 C ~
1-1/2" Meter 15.00
2" Meter 118.00
(2) Volume Charge Rate Per 1,000 Gallons I
WINTER SUMMER
Billing months of Billing months of
NOV through APRIL MAY through OCT
0-15,000 gals 2.65 2.65
15,000-30,000 gals 2.65 3.60 i
Over 300000 gals 12.65 14.50
MINIMUM BILLING: Facility Charge
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and becoms past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in ordEr to must
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
I
PAGE 24
I 1 r.
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill-
ings annually.
Formula:
Actual days in readin period x customer charge
ays
(b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per
month to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to
each rate block.
Formula: [
i
Actual days in reatiing period x GAL in rate block x RATE
IT days per 1,000 gallons in rate
block
i ,
j 1
j '
r,
1
PA6E 25
1
yM• ..YfM 1
J
T
f
SCHEDULE WCE
I'F EXfRA-JURISDICTIONAL COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL
WATER SERVICE
ect ve 10/1/901
I
I APPLICATION
Applicable for all commercial and industrial users or other
I `F users not otherwise classified under this ordinance outside of the
corporate limits of the City of Denton for all water service pro-
( vided at one point of delivery and measured through one meter.
Not applicable to temporary, standby or supplementary service,
except in conjunction with applicable rider.
NET MONTHLY RATE
(1) Facility Charge Billing Per 30 Days
3/4" Meter 17.00
1" Meter 18.75
1-1/2" Meter 23.75
2" Meter 27.00
3" Meter 80.50
4" Meter 135.00 1
6" Meter 173.00
8" deter 1196.00
(2) Volume Charge $2.75 per 1,000 gallons
MINIMUM BILLING: Facility Charge
M
E PAYMENT r
` Bills are due when rendered, and become part sue if not paid
within 15 calenuar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES '
` All services which require special facilities in order to meet
` customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
~r special facilities rider.
I PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill-
ings annually.
PAGE 26
~ r
i
~ ~II
r4 /
i ww'w
M
r
P
Formula:
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
ays
(b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per
month to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to
each rate block.
Formula: 1
Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE
JV ays per 11000 gallons in rate
block
SPECIAL FACILITIES RIDER
(1) All service shall be offered from available facilities.
If a customer service characteristic requires facilities
and devices which are not normally and readily available
at the location at which the customer requests service,
' then the Utility shall provide the service subject to ,
paragraph 2 of this schedule. ,
(2) The total cost of all facilities required to meet the
customer's load characteristics which are incurred by the
Utility shall be subject to a special contract entered
( into between the Utility and the customer. This contract ~
shall be signed by both parties prior to the Utility
providing service to the customer.
i
1
r
U
I
PAGE 27 ,
f 9
f
r.r-,
1
r
SECTION 11. That if any section, subsection, paragraph,
sentence; Fra e, phraee or word in this ordinance, or application
thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid by any
court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City
Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would
have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. i
SECTION III. That the Schedule of Rates herein adopted shall i
be a ec vs, charged and applied to the first regular billing
cycle on or after October 1, 1990, except for Schedule W41 and
WW2, which shall be effec*ive for all water services supplied ,
after January 10 1991.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1990.
,
R
ATTEST.
JENNIFER WALTERS$ CITY SECRETARY
BY:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH9 CITY ATTORNEY
2972L 3
PAGE 28
i
s Ole
i~
I'
r
C ITY'
COUNCILS
;I
I
oo~~ O
[S 6 4
[~4
i!
i`
r 'a
'I N' Ye ` 1
September 18, 1990
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
To: MAYOR AND MEmI36KJ uF Thr, CITY COUNCIL
FROM: R.E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities
Rr.: CONSIDER ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING NEW WASTEWATER
RATFS AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
RECOMMENDATIONt 1
The Public Utilities board, at their meeting of August 2, 1990,
recommended to the City Council approval of the proposed Wastewater
Rate Ordinance.
SUMMARYt
The City Council reviewed this Itern at their work session of September 4,
1990. The analysis of the existing wastewater rates Indicates 1991 ?
revenues of $6,597,432, and expenses of $7,103,691, for a loss of
$506,209. With rates as proposed in the attached document, wastewater
revenue would be Increased by 9.V6%, resulting in a net gain of $106,907,
or an approximate margin of 1.5%. The proposed new wastewater rate
would Increase the bill of an average 7,300 gallon per month customer
from $14.25 per month to $13.23 per month for an Increase of $1.00 per
month.
f After developing total wastewater system rate requirements, Individual
customer rates were developed by distributing ldentifable costs to each
customer class. The outcome of the cost of service analysis and the
corresponding customer class rates are detailed In Exhibit 11.
based on the proposed customer class rates, a comparison between the
current rate and the proposed rate is provided in Exhibit 11. Examples of
how the proposed rates will effect the customer's bill have been provided
In Exhibit Ill. Provides! In Exhibit IV Is the comparlso,i of Denton's j
proposed rates with other cities. f
FISCAL SUMMARYt i
Based on the proposed 9.46% increase In wastewater, the projected
revenues would cover the total expenditures and produce a net gain of
$106,907 In wastewater.
{
I
I
1
ww.
;i rur~r~ i)
i
r
Page 2
Wastewater Rate Ordinance J
1
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEDt
Citizens of Denton, Denton Municipal Utilities, General Government
Departments, Customer Service, Legal Department, Public Utilities
Board, and City Council.
4 izespe fully submitted,
v
Llo d V. Harrell, City M nager
Prepared by3
Howard Martin, U'rctor
Financial Administration 4
APPROVtU HYt
R. E. Nelson, xeeutlye (rector
Department of Utilities
Exhibits 1 Budget/Rate Study Financial Analysis
t.1 Current vs Proposed Rates
III Effect of Hates on Customers Bills
IV Rate Comparisons with Other Cities
V Ordinance
V1 Minutes of PUB Meeting of 912190
1
d
I
I
6917UHI-12
i
3
j
k 4
EXHIBIT I-WASTEWATER
Rm"T/MTI 8111oT /IM WTAL AMALY31$
MACMATQ 314$44$1'
M
't HATS STUDY
I . RVIM =
ORMATING w $4,606,643 $4,401,143 3
303,000 116,339
TOTAL $$Ydq!® $69607,$43 $4,697,483
11, $=P$II l rjm
OP6MATIMO UP $400"tooo $4,11!,16$
No-op UP 3,o19,00o 11940,770
. DUMIATIOM IMP
(VWLNALB) 0 43, 9$4
TOTAL 6IP• $7011$1000 $$,!03,911
N
OT OAINALO$9) ($310,167) ($ba,1a)
W/o U" tNcwm
i
M 9044x BAn loan=
MCI
Exhibit II
City of Denton Wastewater Utility
Current vs. Proposed Rates
Rate Schedule Proposed
Current
Raise
Rates
RESIDENTIAL SEWER
Facility Char;a 84.00
Commodity Chavio/1000 gal 1.50 13.00
1.50
REGULAR COMMERCIAL SEWER
Facility Charge
Commodity Charge/1000 gal 810.00 $7.25
1.85 1.78
PRETREATMENT SEWER
Facility Charge $30.00
Volume Charge/1000 gal 2.50 $7.25 j
Surcharge - (See Below) 1.90 i
EATING PLACES
Facility Charge 610.00
Volume Charge/1000 gal 87.24
2.46 ~I
Surcharge - (See Below) 1.95
EQUIPMENT SERVICES
Facility Charge 610.00 17.26
Volume Charge/1000 gal 2.46 1.96
Surcharge - (See Below)
WHOLESALE SEWER
Facility Charge 4126.00 $126.00
Commodity Charge/1000 gal 2.10 1.95
Surcharge - (See Below)
INTRA-GOVERNMENTAL SEWER
Facility Charge $10.00 $7.50
Commodity Charge/1000 gal 1.60 1.60
f RESIDENTIAL SEWER SSRVICE TO USERS
WITHOUT DENTON WATER SERVICE
Pao Char Corporate Lmts 14.00 $2.26
Pao Char 0 Corporate Late 6.75 3.35 p
Commodity Charge/1000 gal CL 1.50 1.50 f
Commodity Charge/1000 gal OCL 2.25 2.25 }
Surcharge - BOD 1/ppa > 250 0.001716
- TSS $/ppm > 250 0.001312 0.000743
0.000761
P
)
,i
L7 '7-10~
OWL.
EXHIBIT III i
COMMERCIAL WASTEWATER
TABLE
MONTHLY-IMPACT OF RATE INCREASE
ON A RESTAURANT y
CURRENT PROPOSED
-RATES RATES
1. FACILITY CHARGE
s7.25
$1o.oa
2. VOLUME CHARGE
$156.00
3. TOTAL $196.00 4. CHANGE ;
$163.23 $206.00
a) In Dollars $42.75
a) In Paresnt 26.191 i
USAGE DATA s
A. Commercial dischargs based on average monthly i
I
consumption of 1001000 0110ns Of water.
I,
x
c I
J
I
i
ly1
EXHIBIT III
COMMERCIAL WASTEWATER TABLE 6
MO1FrHLY IMPACT OF RATE INCREASE ON A CAR WASH
CURRENT . PROPOSED
RATES RATES 1
u
1. FACILITY CHARGE $7.25 $10.00
2. VOLUME CHARGE ;390.00 ;490.00
3. TOTAL $397.23 $500.00
4. CHA(IGF.
a) In Dollars $102.75
a) In Percent 25.87%
USAGE DATA s
1
A. Commercial discharge based on a%-tr!ge monthly consumption
of 250,000 gallons.
B. Equipment Services Rate
j
l
1
7t
1
Y
r
EXHIBIT III
PRETREATMENT -WASTEWATER TABLE 7 1
MONTHLY IMPACT OF RATE INCREASE ON A PRETREATMENT CUSTOMER
CURRENT i
PROPOSED
RATES RATES-
1. FACILITY CHARGE
$7.25 ;30.00
2. VOLUME CHARGE $190.00
$2so.oo
3. TOTAL $197,25 1180,00 )
4. CHANGE
a) In Dollars $82.75
a) In Percent 41.951
1
USAGE DATA t
A. Pretreatment discharge based on average monthly
consumptlon of 1000000 gallons of water.
f
+
i
t
~
~vv
r
EXHIBIT IV
WASTEWATER RATE COMPARISON 'FABLE 8
WITH OTHER CITIES
#
1
RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL
1. ARLINGTGN $11.03 $58.15
2. CARROLLTON $14.19 $65.23
3. DENTON $15.03 $69.20
4. LEWISVILLE $16.05 $77.80
USAGE DATA
A. f
A. Residential discharge based on 7,500 gallons of water
consumption.
B. Commercial discharge based on 40,000 gallons of water
consumption.
'I
_ i
f
1
k
Fri
f
PUB Minutes EXCERPT FROM PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
Page 4 MINUTES 8/2/40
EXHIBIT VI
1. REVIEW PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE 1991 WATER AND WASTEWATER
RATE STUDIES.
i
Nelson presented overviews to the Board showing a deficit of
over $888,000 in water, and over $506,000 in wastewater for
1991 at the present rate structure. The Board had given
instruction to allow a 1-1/21 margin between revenues and
expenses in rate increases. Careful review and calculation
of all proposed revenues and expenses resulted in the
rs recommendation of a 9.911 increase in water rates and a
9.461 increase in wastewater rates for 1991.
LaForte felt this was better than the expected 12% increase
previously anticipated due to the EPA requirements for the
building of a new wastewater treatment plant.
Nelson informed the Board that the UTRWD anticipated payment
of $704,000 will help our debt service considerably. Nelson
noted that revenue from pro rata had been eliminated from
the budget.
Thompson asked about pro rata. Nelson informed him that the
question was addressed to City Council. Our City Attorney,
as well as TML's, agreed that the 1987 legislative action
regarding pro rata established that we can not charge for
f pro rata. The City Council preferred not to go to the j
expense of asking the Attorney General for his opinion.
i
Harrell questioned about funds going back into General
Government from Utilities relative to the Utility basis
rates being charged to Corinth and LCMUA. Nelson explained
that the Utility will continue to pay General Government a y
61 return on investment for all rate base. However, the
utility cannot pass this cost directly onto the wholesale l
customers because of Texas Water Commission regulations
1 regarding fair rate of return. However, the Utilities will
charge the wholesale customers 1.51 over imbedded interest
rate on rate base assets, plus .641, which is what a private
utility would pass on as the cities ad valorem tax rate, j
plus an amount equal to 41 of gross revenues as a street
rental fee. l
{
He noted that this may not totally capture the 61 return on
investment the Utility must pay, but when revenues for
depreciation are taken into account, wherein depreciation
rates are over 20 years but asset may last 35 years, the
utility is probably about breaking even. He noted that the
Texas Water Commission probably would not allow any greater
rate of return if our rates were challenged.
1
}
r
PUB Minutes
fIC'.!Y Page 5
t
Nelson reviewed the current vs the proposed rates -
residential and commercial, and the impact of the rate
increase on the small, average, and large customers. 4
Thompson asked if action was requested. Nelson said no, the
{ Utility needed guidance from the Board with regard to any
changes in the proposed rate increases.
f Member Frady left the meeting at this time for another
Y
appointment. ;
LaForte moved and Lanny seconded the proposed rate increase
` for 1991 and going onto City Counoll for their approval.
i All ayes, no nays, motion carried.
k i g
Meeting adjourned at 1:45 p.m. Next regular scheduled meeting
was set for August 15, 1990, at S OO p.m.
II
f~
!J
r
A
PUBMIN.002
i
i
i
k. . v. ...'..ni.a r . aJA..n 4L9iM'+MIrnH'unn+~•,•••
::i 1
YN~r ~P
M1iv
T
for." '
S
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SCHEDULE OF RATES FOR SEWER SERVICE; PRO-
VIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
i
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the Rate Schedules for sewer service as pro-
vided- for in Chapter 25 of the Code of Ordinances, are amended to
read as follows: €
SEWER RATE SCHEDULES
PAGE
SR Residential Sewer Service 2 1
i
SRW Religious Worship Sewer Service 4 5
Sc Regular Commercial Industrial Sewer Service 6
SEP Restaurants & Food Service Sewer Service 8
SES Equipment Services Sewer Service 10
SPT Commercial/Industrial Pretreatment Sewer Services 12
SCD Commercial/Industrial Sewer Service with 14
Dedicated Water Meters
SSC Wholesale Sewer Treatment Service for a
Governmental Agency, Division or Subdivision 16
SG Intra-governmental Sewer Service 18
SGE Sale of Treated Sewer Effluent to Municipal 20
Utility Customers
SM Metered Sewer Inside/Outside Corporate Limits 21
SRO ReedDenton Corporate Limits Users Outside
of 23
SRN Residential Sewer Service to Users without City 25
l of Denton Water Service
SCO Cothe city/ofdDentonlCoSewer rporaterLimitsutside 27
3
s
I
I ! SCHEDULE SR
M RESIDENTIAL SEWER SERVICE
E ect ve 10/1/901
APPLICATION
Applicable for single family residential service, and indivi-
dually metered apartments or mobile homes or multi-family facil-
ities with less than 4 units. a~
Not a licable for sub-billing or other utility billing by 1
sere ce user n any event.
NET MONTHLY RATE i
i
(1) Facility Charge $4.00/30 days
(2) Volume Charge $1.50/1,000 gallon effluent
Billing shall be based on ninety-eight (98X) percent of water fi
consumption but shall not exceed a maximum of twenty-five thousand
(25,000) gallons. Monthly billings for the period March through
November shall be based on the average monthly rate of water con-
sumption during the immediately prior months of December through
February. Billings for the months of December through February
shall be based on actual consumption. New residential customers
who do not rave a full prior non-irrigational history (December
through February) will have a maximum bill based on ninety-eight
(98x) percent of water consumption or ten thousand (10,000) gallons
of water consumption, whichever is less until a non-irrigational
water consumption history is established.
,
MINIMUM BILLING
Facility Charge $4.00/30 days
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES l
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be providt4 subject to the
special facilities rider.
~.J
PAGE 2
i
FF
a..
i
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billing Eor the Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill-
ings annually.
k
Formula:
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
ays
(b) Billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days
pper month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged
to each rate block.
Formula:
Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE
ays per 1,000 gallons in rate
block
r~
i
i
~1 '
I
I
Y ~ !
I
i
PAGE 3
f1
1
r
SCHEDULE SRW
RELIGIOUS WORSHIP SEWER SERVICE
- [Effective 10/1/901
APPLICATION
Applicable to all facilities used primarily for religious
worship and/or religious education and not for residence or
commercial or industrial enterprise.
Not a licable for aub-billing or other utility billing by
serv ce user in any event.
NET MONTHLY RATE }
(1) Facility Charge $4.00/30 days {
(2) Volume Charge $1.50/1,000 gallon effluent g
a
Billing shall be based on ninety-eight (98X) percent of water
consumption but shall not exceed a maximum of twenty-five thousand
(251000) gallons. Monthly billings for the period March through
November shall be based on the average monthly rate of water con- 1
sumption during the immediately prior months of December through 4
February. Billings for the months of December through February
shall be based on actual consumption. New customers who do not
have a full prior non-irrigational history (December through
February) will have a maximum bill based on ninety-eight (98X)
II percent of water consumption or ten thousand (10,000) gallons of
water consumption, whichever is lose until a non-irrigational
water consumption history is established.
MINIMUM BILLING
r,
$4.00/30 days
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES 1
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
PAGE 4
I'
O~
SA
r
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill-
ings annually. i.
I
Formula:
Actual da a in reading period x customer charge
30 das
i
(b) Billing for the sever effluent shall be based on 30 days
per month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged
to each rate block.
Formula:
Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate black x RATE
30 ays per 1,000 gallons in rate
block
I
i
i
I
1
i
t
PAGE 5
i
~w
SCHEDULE SC
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL SEWER SERVICE
Effective 1011
APPLICATION A
Applicable to all commercial and industrial sewer service users
and to all newer service users not otherwise classified under Sche-
dules SEP, SES, SPT, or. SCD.
NET MONTHLY RATE j
(1) Facility Charge $10.00/30 days I
(2) Volume Charge $1.85/1,000 gallon effluent
i
Billing based on eighty
consumption. (80%) percent of monthly water
.
MINIMUM BILLING
$10.00/30 days
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
i
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All a rvices which require special facilities in order to meet
a customers service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
PRORATION OP UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billings :or the Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill-
ings annually.
PAGE 6
1
. I'
~ra
I~er,t•
F
r
Formula:
Actual days in reading period x customer charge }
ays
(b) Billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days i~
per month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged 1
to each rate block.
Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE
ays per 1,000 gallons in rate
block
I
i
1
'I
II
r.
1
i
i
PAGE 7
I
I
FY
~ M.
s SCHEDULE SEP
r
RESTAURANTS & FOOD SERVICE SEWER SERVICE
-['E ect ve
APPLICATION
Applicable to all restaurants and food service operations
which prepare and serve food directly to customers and are
categorized by Standard Industrial Code Numbers 5812 or 5813.
NET MONTHLY RATE
x%to (1) Facility Charge $10.00/30 days
(2) Volume Charge $2.45/1,000 gallon effluent
Billing based on eighty (80%) percent of monthly water con-
sumption.
SEP EXEMPTIONS
t
(1) Customers under the SEP rate shall be charged the SC rate R
if only pre-wrapped and pre-processed foods are served
from their premises and no food processing is performed on
the premises so that only minimal organic material is
discharged to the sanitary sewer. The exemption for the i
SEP class shall be determined by the City of Denton
Environmental Health Services' Food Inspection Division.
(2) Customers under the SEP rates shall be charged the SC rate
plus an industrial surcharge if the customer:
(a) Installs a wastewater sampling manhole on their
sanitary sewer discharge line;
(b) Agrees to pay for the City to aample and analyze,
quarterly, the wastewater discharge for the following
parameters; Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Total
Suspended Solids (TSS), and Fate, Oils and Grease
(FOG), based on the actual coats plus administrative
charges; and
(c) Agrees to pay, based on the industrial surcharge
formula, a surcharge on all wastewater discharged that
is in excess of 250 mg/l of BOD and TSS as determined 4
by the monitoring performed in Section 2(b).
INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE
The industrial surcharge calculation that applies to restau-
rants and food service claiming the SEP Exemption (2) shall be
based on the following formula:
PAGE 8
t
Ile
! Cu-Vu ([Bu-2501 B + [Su-250} S))
Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X.
Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X.
Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 250 mg/10
whichever is greater.
B is the unit coat factor ($0.001386) for treating
one unit of BOD per 1,000 gallons.
Su is the tested SS level for user X or 250 mg/l,
whichever is greater.
S is the unit coat factor .($0.001715) for treating
one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons.
F
MINIMUM BILLING
$10.00/30 days
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
1 PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billings for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill-
ings annually.
Formula:
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
days
(b) Billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days
j per month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged
to each rate block.
Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate _:k x RATE
days per 1,000 gallons in rate
block
PAGE 9
I
SCHEDULE SES
EQUIPMENT SERVICES SEWER SERVICE
IttrecElve
APPLICATION
Applicable to establishments which perform washing, clean~nj
or servicing of automobiles, trucks, busses or similar equipment
and are categorized by Standard Industrial Code Numbers 5541, 7549 ;
or 7542.
NET MONTHLY RATE
(1) Facility Chmjp $10.00/30 days
(2) Volume Charge $2.45/1,000 gallon effluent
Billing based on eighty (80x) percent of monthly water consump-
tion.
SES EXEMPTIONS
Customers under the SES rates shall be charged the SC rata
plus an industrial surcharge if the customer:
(a) Installs a wastewater sampling manhole on their sani-
tary sewer discharge line; J
(b) Agrees to pay for the City to sample and analyze, Ii
quarterly, the wastewater discharge for the following
parameters; Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Total
Suspended Solids (TSS), and Fats, Oils and Grease 1
(F00), based on the actual costs plus administrative
charges; and
(c) Agrees to pay, based on the industrial surcharge
formula, a surcharge on all wastewater discharged that
is in excess of 250 mg/1 of BOD and TSS as determined
by the monitoring performed in Section 2(b).
INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE
The industrial surcharga calculation that applies to equipment
services claiming the SES exemption shall be based on the
following formula
PAGE 10
1
ii
t 7
4}
i
Cu-Vu ((Bu-250) B + (Su-250) S))
Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X.
Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X.
Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 250 mg/1,
whichever is greater.
B is the unit cost factor ($0.001386) for treating
one unit of BOD per .1,000 gallons.
Su is the tested SS level for user X or 250 mg/1,
whichever is greater. t
S is the unit cost factor ($0.001715) for treating
one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons.
MINIMUM BILLING
$10.00/30 days
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) billings annually, Facility charge shall be based on 12
Formula:
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
N days
(b) Billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days
per month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged
to each rate block.
Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block x LUTE
days per 1,000 gallons in rate
block
1
PAGE 11
's
I
x
SCHEDULE SPT
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT SEWER SERVICES
ect ve
' APPLICATION
Applicable to all major commercial/industrial customers subject
to EPA Pretreatment criteria or such other commercial/industrial
customers that have the probability of discharging extra strength
wastewater or which may have substances in their wastewater which
are listed on EPA's categorical pollutant list.
NET MONTHLY CHARGE
(1) Facility Charge $30.00/30 days
(2) Volume Charge $2.50/1,000 gallon effluent
(3) Surcharge 10.001386/mg/l of BOD
0.001715/mg/l of SS
Billing shall be based on 80% of water consumption or actual
metered sewer. {
INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE ,
I In addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial,
I there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge
based on the following iormula:
Cu=Vu ((Bu-2501 B + [Su-250)
Whore: Cu is the surcharge for user X.
Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X.
Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 250 mg/10
whichever is greater.
B is the unit cost factor ($0.001386) for treating
one unit of BOD per 10000 gallons.
Su is the tested SS level for user X or 250 mg/l,
whichever is greater.
I S is the unit cost factor ($0.001715) for treating
one unit of SS per 1 000 gallons.
I MINIMUM BILLING
$30.00/30 days
PAGE 12
If
I
,I 1
*Awl
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS J
(a) billings annually. Facility charge shall be based on 12
bill
Formula: A
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
` 0 days
(b) Billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days
per month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged
to each rate block.
Actual da s in reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE
JO days er 1,000 gallons in rate
block
iPAGE 13
G:
I
i
j
7_7 OMBAP
.o.
k
SCHEDULE SCD
COMMERCIAL/IN STRIAL SEWER SERVICE WITH
DEDICATED WA ER METERS
ect ve
APPLICATION
userspp ndatoe alto all l sewerc smervicel useand rs not industrial
otherwise sewer
classified
under this ordinance whose wastewater is determined by a meter
dedicated to measuring water flow prior to the return of
wastewater to the collection and treatment system.
Not a licable for sub-billing or other utility billing by
serv ce user n an
event.
Y
NET MONTHLY RATE 1
(1) Facility Charge Billing Per 30 Days
31,4" Meter 15.75
1 ' Meter 17.25
f 1-1/2" Meter 20.00
2 Meter 22.25
3" Meter 63.00
41Moter 105.00 611 I
Meter 135.00
8" Meter 153.00
{
(2) Volume Charge $1.85/19000 gallon effluent
(3) Surcharge 10.001386/mg/1 of BOD
` 0.001715/mg/l of SS
Billing based on ninety-eight (98X) percent of the actual
gallons measured by the meter.
INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE
I` In addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial
there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial
surcharge based on the following formulas
h Cu•Vu ((Bu-250] B + (Su-2301 S))
II
Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X.
Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X.
PAGE 14 '
i
r
s
I
Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 250 mg/1,
whichever is greater.
B is the unit cost factor ($0.001386) for treating
one unit of BOD per 1,000 gallons.
I
Su is the tested SS level for user X or 250 mg/1, i
whichever is greater. !
S is the unit coat factor ($0.001715) for treating
one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons.
t
h MINIMUM BILLING
I
Facility Charge
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billing for the Facility chargi shall be based on 12 bill- t
inge annually.
Formula:
Actual da s in reading period x customer charge
ays
(b) Billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days
r r month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged
each rate block.
Formula:
Actual days in reading periodx GAL in rata block x RATE
3 ays per 1,040 gallons in rate
block
I
i
PAGE 15
~ i
j
a (Effective -1-911
WHOLESALE SEWER TREATMENT SERVICE FOR A GOVERNMENTAL
AGENCY, DIVISION OR SUBDIVISION
APPLICATION
Applicable to any municipal corporation, or other governmental
agency or subdivision which operates a sewer collection system for i
its own customers and contracts with the City of Denton for sewer
treatment service.
NET MONTHLY RATE
(1) Facility Charge $125.00/30 days 1
(2) Volume Charge $2.10/1,000 gallon of effluent
(3) Surcharge 0.001386/mg/l of BOD
0.001715/mg/l of SS
i
Billing shall be based on one-hundred (100x) percent of actual
gallons measured by mater at one point.
MINIMUM BILLING
$125.00/30 days
INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE
In addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial.
there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge
based on the following formula: j
Cu■Vu ((Bu-2501 B + (Su-250) S1)
Wheret Cu is the surcharge for user X,
Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X.
Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 250 mg/10
whichever is greater.
B is the unit cost factor ($0.001386) for treating
one unit of BOD per 10000 gallons.
Su is the tested SS level for user X or 250 mg/l,
whichever is greater.
S is the unit coot factor ($0,001715) for treating
one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons.
PAGE 16
+.ar ter..
o
rom.
i
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customers service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill-
ings annually.
Formula:
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
30 days
(b) Billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days
per month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged
to each rate block.
i
Formula: +
Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE
B~aYs per 1,000 ga110uj in rate
block
iJ
EFFECTIVE DATE
The charges stated herein shall be applied to all sewer ser-
vices provided after January 1 1991. Until January 1, 1991
applicable charges will be Determined by Schedule S3 of
Ordinance 89-136.
PAGE 17
I
t
r
INTRA-GOVERNMENTAL SEWER SERVICE
act ve `
APPLI ATION Af
R 1
Applicable to all City of Denton Departments and agencies for
all sewer service.
NET MONTHLY RATE
(1) Facility Charge $10.00/30 days 1
(2) Volume Charge $1.60/1,000 gallon effluent
(3) Surcharge 10.001386/mg/l of BOD
0.001715/mg/1 of SS
i
Billing shall be based on eighty (80%) percent of water
consumption.
INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE
In addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial,
there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge
based on the following formula:
Cu-Vu ([Bu-250] B + (Su-250) SD
Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X.
Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X.
Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 230 m8/1,
whichever is greater.
B is the unit cost factor
one unit of BOD per 1,000 gallons386) for treating
Su is the tested SS level for user X or 250 mg/l,
whichever is greater.
S is the unit coat factor j
one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons 1715) for treating
MINIMUM BILLING ~
$10.00/30 days
PACE 18
t
PAYMENT
Bills are due when renderedi and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from dete of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet 9
Lai .
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the ) 1
special facilities rider.
t
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based o
ings annually. n 12 bill-
Formula:
Actual days in readin eriod x customer charge
ays
(b) Billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days 1
per month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged
to each rate block.
Formula:
Actual days in readin eriod x CAL in rate block x RATE
aye blr1,000 gallons in rate
Y
JI
i
1
r
I
PACE 19
Ole- __77
~gfler .rnn
I
!F!
J
V 4:
r
r
SCHEDULE SGE
SALE OF TREATED SEWER EFFLUENT TO
MUNICIPAL UTILITY CUSTOMERS
ect ve
APPLICATION
Applicable on sales of treated sewer effluent to any municipal
utility.
Not available for resale in any event.
NET MONTHLY RATE
(1) Facility Charge $97.00/30 days
(2) Volume Charge $ .90/1,000 gallon effluent
i
MINIMUM BILLING
$97.00/30 days
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered and become
past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill-
ings annually.
Formula:
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
Ju days
(b) Billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days
or month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged
to each rate block.
Formulas
Actual da n in reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE
ays par 1,000 gallons in rate
block
PAGE 20
1
SCHEDULE SM
METERED SEWER INSIDE/OUTSIDE CORPORATE LIMITS
act ve r
APPLICATION
Applicable to any sewer service customer desiring to meter all
sewage discharge from a single customer location and not otherwise
classified under this ordinance.
NET MONTHLY RATE (Inside (Outside f
corporate Limits) Cor orate Limits
° I
(1) Facility Charge $130.00/30 days $195.00/30 days
(2) Volume Charge $1.90/1,000 gals $2.50/1000 gals
discharge discharge
(3) Surcharge 10.001386/mg/l of SOD
0.001715/mg/1 of SS
INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE
In addition to the above charge, there will be added to the
net monthly rate for commercial and industrial, an industrial
surcharge based on the following formula:
Cu-Vu ((Bu-250) B + (Su-250) S)) 1
Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X.
Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X.
Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 250 m8/10
whichever is greater.
I U B is the unit cost factor ($0.001386) for treating
I one unit of BOD per 1,000 gallons.
Su is the tested SS level for user X or 250 mg/1,
whichever is greater.
S ($0.001715) is the unit cost factor for treating
one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons, i
i
MINIMUM BILLING (Within (Outside ;
Corporate Limits) Corporate Limits)
$130.00/30 days $195,00/30 days
PAGE 21
i MI
FF
g~
Y p
I
t
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
4 SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
If customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
h PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billing, for the Facility charge shall be based on 12
billings annually.
Formula:
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
days
(b) Billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days E
per month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged
to each rate block.
Formula:
Actual days in rc.ading period x GAL in rate block x RAPE
daa-ys per 1,000 gallons in rate
block
i
fl
1
t,
i,
F.`
4
PAGE 22
~I
I `r e
I
SCHEDULE SRO
E RESIDENTIAL SEWER SERVICE TO USERS
OUTSIDE CITY OF DENTON CORPORATE LIMITS
LEttective
i " APPLICATION
Applicable for single family residential sewer customers
individually metered apartments or mobile homes or multi-family
facilities with less than 4 units outside of the corporate limits
r of the City of Denton and also receiving water from the City of
Denton.
i
NET MONTHLY RATE
(1) Facility Charge $5.75/30 days ++I
(2) Volume Charge $2.25/1,000 gallon effluent
Billing shall be based on ninety-eight (93x) percent of water
consumption but shall not exceed a maximum of twenty-five thousand
(25,000) gallons. Monthly billings for the period March through
November shall I)e based on the average monthly rate of water ,
consumption during the immediately prior months of December ;
through February. Billings for the months of December through
February shall be based on actual consumption. New residential
customers who do not have a full prior non-irrigational history
(December through February) will have a maximum bill based on
ninety-eight (98x) percent of water consumption or ten thousand
(10,000) gallons of water consumption, whichever is less until a
non-irrigational water consumption history is established.
MINIMUM BILLING
$5.75/30 days 1
3
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered and become
past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
+ I
PACE 23
l
1
FM
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill-
ings annually.
1
Formula:
i
Actual da a in reading period x customer charge
ays 1
(b) Billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days
per month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged
to each rate block.
t
Formula:
Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE
30 ays per 1,000 gallons in rate
block l
i
i
i
{
y
i
PAGE 24
i
M
N
SCHEDULE SRN
RESIDENTIAL SEWER SERVICE TO USERS WITHOUT
CITY OF DENTON WATER SERVICE
LEffective s
APPLICATION
Applicable to all residential facilities not also receiving
metered water service from the City of Denton, including subdivi-
sions, for apartments, mobile home parks, or other residential
service users. The monthly charge will be based on the maximum
number of occupied residential units served during the month,
times the volume and facility charge.
NET MONTHLY RATE
z
(Inside (Outside
Corporate Limits) Corporate Limits)
(1) Facility Charge $ 4.00/30 days $5.75/30 days
(2) Volume Charge $ 1.50/1,000 gals $2.25/1,000 gals
Minimum volume charge will be for five thousand (5,000) gallons s
per month.
MINIMUM BILLING
$11.50 per 30 days $17.00 per 30 days
per resident unit per resident unit
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
N within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12
bil'Ings annually.
PAGE 25
1
FA~
OA
~ I
Formula:
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
-3 ay
(b) Billing for the sewer effluent shall by based on 30 days
per month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged
to each rate block.
I
Formula: }
GAL in rate block x RATE
Actual days in reading period x pock
3 days bl'000 gallons in rate
I
Y
` I
I
i
II
j S
I
i
r
PAGE 26 1
j
I
r
SCHEDULE SCO
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL SEWER SERVICE
OUTSIDE CITY OF DENTON CORPORATE LIMITS
ect ve ,f
APPLICATION 1
Applicable to all commercial, industrial or any other facility
not otherwise covered under this ordinance outside the corporate
limits of the City of Denton and receiving sewer service from the
City of Denton.
NET MONTHLY RATE
(1) Facility Charge $12.75/3Q days
(2) Volume Charge $2.50/1,000 gallon effluent
s
(3) Surcharge 0.001386/mg/l of BOD
0.001715/mg/l of SS
Billin based on eighty
g (80X) percent of monthly water coneump-
tion.
R
INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE
In addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial,
there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge
based on the following formula:
Cu■Vu ((Bu-250] B + [Su-2503 S])
Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X.
" Y Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X.
Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 250 mg/1,
{ whichever is greater.
B is the unit cost factor ($0.001386) for treating
one unit BOD per 1,000 gallons.
Su is the tested SS level for user X or 250 mg/1,
whichever is greater.
S is the unit cost factor ($0.001715) for treating
one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons.
I
PAGE 27
1
yp~rr
MIM
iCi* ilr
I-WTI
J
3
P
MINIMUM BILLING
$12.75/30 days
PAYMENT
Bills arrn due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. i
SPECIAL FACILITIES
p
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be praiided subject to the
special facilities rider.
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12
billings annually.
Formula:
Actual. days in reading ertid x customer charge
aye
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
n (a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill-
ings annually.
Formula:
i Actual days in read in period x customer charge
30 ays
(b) Billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days
per month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged
to each rate block.
Formula:
Actual days in reading period x pGAL in rate block x RATE
days block'000 gallons in rate
PAGE 28
,
7-T-, 77 7
1 i
z
r
SECTION II.
That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause,
phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any
erson or circumstances is held invalid by any court of competent
jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the
City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such
remaining portions despite any such invalidity.
SECTION III.
i
That the Schedule of Rates herein adopted shall be effective,
charged and applied to the first regular billing cycle accruing on
or after October 1, 1990, except for Schedule SSC, which shall be
effective for sewer serti,ices provided after January 1, 1991.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1990.
I
i
ATTEST:
i
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY., i
2973L
i
PACE 29
i
I
I
<rw.r
r i
6
CITY
COUNCIL
a
~ 00 I
4 6 s
~ d
E
P
f
QQ N' S t ~~OO
Qaa acoo~
1
1
j•
N
t
September 18, 1990
a
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR d MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: LLOYD V. HARRELL, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING RATES FOR
RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL SANITATION COLLECTION SERVICES.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of August 20 1990,
recormnded to the City Council, approval of subject 68 increase.
1
j ~
i
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND:
The City Council reviewed the Item during the work session of
9-4-90. As presented to the Public Utilities Board on May 9, 199D..
and again m August 20 1990, the Solid Waste budget for the 1990-91
fiscal year includes a 68 rate Increase for residential, commercial
and the majority of landfill fees. The rate Increase Is necessary
E in order for the Department to maintain current levels of service
L . and to provide for the minor expansion of some programs to meet new
demands placed on the Department. In effect, the proposed increase
will generate approximately $20D,432 in additional funds for the
Department.
A 6% increase In residential rates will result in an increase of
560 per month for each residential customer. Current rates would
increase from $9.39 to $9.95 per month and would cost each customer
$6.11 per year. Wlth a rate of $9.95, the Department w11i be able
to continue to maintain the dependabl I Ity and effectiveness of our
current levels of service. The Department will be able to continue
providing twice weekly collection at each residential unit, special
collection of brush and bulky items each Wednesday, and the dls-
trlbutlon of two rolls of garbage to each customer per year, they
operation of the City's mosqu'tn spraying program.
The proposed increase will result in an across-the-board Increase
of 6% of all levels of canmarcial services. The attached Exhibit
2pub091090csw/1
i
Ile-
"r 1S I
k
Ile
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
September 18, 1990
r.,'. Page 2
t
provides the specific dollar increases for each class of customer
which would result from a 68 increase.
For our durpster customers, the average dollar increase would be
$6.02 with a low of $1.02 and a high of $17.76. For our roll-off
customers, the average dollar increase will be $8.06 with a low of
$3.72 and a high of $13.02. The proposed Increase will generate an
estimated $830892 In additional commercial revenues.
The $200,432 generated by this and the accaWnYIng landfill
Increase would als,) allow for the funding of all supplemental
packages Included in the proposed budget as presented to the Public
Utilities Board on May 9, 1990, and August 2, 1990.
These packages include:
1. Scraper Rental (Disposal) S 45,000
2. Tire Cutter (Disposal) 21784
3. Replace Pickup (Residential) 50835
4. T-Rubber Seal (Disposal) 500
5. Front Load Durpsters (Commercial) 410000
6. Front Load Truck (Commercial) 160250
7. Drop-off Recycling (Residential) 71990
8. Curbside Recycling (Residential) 170272
9. Christmas Tree Recycling (Residential) 10865
10. Adopt a Street Mile Program (Residential) 11 260
Total $1-49,756
In addition to covering the cost of these packages, the increase..
Wien coupled with baseline revenues and expenditures, will generate
$84,080 in net Intone for the Sanitation Fund. At the and of the
1990-91 fiscal year, the net Income will be applied to the deficit
which currently exists in the Sanitation Fund. Such action is
absolutely essential to the retlrement of the fund deficit within a
reasonable time frame.
It would be possible to avoid this Increase in rates by not funding
the supplemental packages and reducing the amount of net income to
be applied to the fund deficit in a reasonable time frame. y1
The items included in supplemental packages one through six which 1
Include scraper rental, tire cutter, replacement plckup, T-rubber
seal, front load dumpsters and front load truck, are essentlal to
the maintenance of current service levels. Failure to fund these 1
packages would adversely affect the Department's ability to provide
service to its customers and would, in all probability, result in
2pub091090csw/2
i
r
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
September 18, 1990
Page 3
some reduction in service level. The scraper rental and tire 1
cutter packages are essential to the proper operation of the
landfill within state and federal guidelines. Failure to fund
these item could result In non-corrpliance ratings from the Texas
Department of Health and eventually, lead to legal actions and
monetary penalties assessed against the City. Likewise, Items such
as the front load durpsters and front load truck are essential to
melntaln current levels and provide for expansion of the commercial
services. Failure to fund these Items could result in the City's j
Inability to service new customers and reductions In current revenue.
Items seven, eight and nine, which include a drop-off recycling ;
center, curbside recycling pilot program and Christmas tree re-
cycling, were developed in an attempt to reduce the amount of waste
going Into the landfill. These programs hava been proposed due to
our own environmental concerns and the recent support such programs
have received from various segments of the comrunity. This support
was recently evidenced by two petitions which were submitted to the
City CounclI demanding that the City implement curbside recycling.
I
The last item which involves an adopt a street mile program was
developed to enhance the appearance of the community be increasing
litter collection along City streets. This approach also has a
side benefit by a;lowing various civic groups a nominal Income for
their involvement. White being extremely cost effective, this
endeavor has significant support from the Beautification Ccemisslon
and the City Council.
One alternative which the Council may have, other than eliminating
some of these programs, Involves the landfill debt retirement fund.
The proposed budget Includes $200,000 which will be placed In the
landfill debt retirement fund. Such a fund was necessitated due to
V the premature closure of the landfill several years before the
landfill development bonds will be paid off. Two years ago, the
' f staff Implemented a plan as endorsed by the City Council whereby
J' funds would be set aside each year to pay off the landfill debt
upon the ci)sure of the landfill. It would be possible to use 1
theso funds to cover the cost of the packagesf however, funds to
cover the landfill debt would need to be recovered at some point in
the f,~ture.
4
1
J
i
i
2pub09lO90csw/3
i
y
i
i
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
14,,
September 180 1990
Pnge 4
3
r
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Solid Waste Customers, Solid Waste Division, Legal Department,
Public Utilities Board, C:ty Council, Denton Munlclpal Utilities.
Respec fu11Y0
G~ v
Lloyd V. Harrell
City Manager
APPROVED BY: 1
R. E, Nelson, Executive Director
Department of Utilities
1
Prepared by:
Bill Angelo, Dlrec r of CommWltY Services i
i
EXHIBIT 1, Exhibit
11. Minutes PUB Meeting of 8/4/90 I
III. Proposed Ordinance
2pub091090csw/4
1
1
1 J
I
41
r r
t
'r
DUWSTERS
CUBIC YARDS
COILECM PER WEIK' PER C1Je1CAYARO PER kEd(
EXISTING
1-3 $8.47 $8.93
4-6
6.53 6.94
1-10 6.48 6.66
11-45 6.15 6.54
46-50 6.10 6.41
51-100 5.93 6.49
101-145 5.68 6.04 [
146-150 5.59 5.93
1 5.33 5.65
8716 6 or or rtdra 5.16 3.41
M
OPEN TOP CONTAINERS AND M*ACTORS
TYPE QP~Cdli INM PER-..-30 (An myleg--osm m CURIC YARD
EXISTIMP
40 cublc yard open too ! 39.33 $5.09 $5.40
3o cable Yard Goan top 34.30 5.09 5.40
40 able yard Gpm top 51.15 3.09 3140
If c bic Yrrrd d earrowtoror 19.45 5.09 5.40
5
40 cubic yard oonmwor 113050 5.04 .40
5.40
c 45 cubic yard capactor 113.50 3.09 5.40
30 cable yard ca detor 137.50 5.09 3.40
44 cable yard Garlfaetor 116.40 5.09 3140
i
r
~ff
E ~
RESIDWtAL RATE: EXISTIN 6 Map=
$9.39 per 30 days $9.93 per 30 days
~ 1
8)1S1/OS09900t0 IRI8tT A-1
s
r MMPSTER RATES
{
2 CUBIC YARD CONTAINERS
SERVICE W WEEK RATE PER 30 DAY Pal(p
EXISTING PROPOSED
RATES
I 1 S 16.84 S 17.86
2 76.12 27.66
! 3 39.18 41.52
4 50.24 53.28
S 62.80 66.60
6 73.80 18.24
F
3 CUBIC YARD CONTAINERS
1 S 25.26 S 26.79
2 39.18 41.52
3
56.52 59.94
4 73.80. 78.24
5 92.25 97.80
6 110.70 117.36 f
44 CHIC YMD COMMIMM
1 s 26.12 5 27.68
? 50.24 $3.28
3 73.80 18.24 J
4 98.40 104.32
1
5 123.00 130.40
6 147.61 156.44
6 CUBIC YARD CONTAINERS
1 f 39.18 41.51
? 73.80 78.14,
3 110.70 117,36
4 147.60 156.48
S 163.00 194.10
6 219.60 231.92
8 CUBIC YARD CONTAINERS
$0.24 ! $3.18
2 98.40 104.32
3 141.60 156.46
4 195.20 201.04
5 244.00 259.80
6 292.80 310.56 j
151/050990071 Intl" A
ROW"d 5/9/90
I
' 1 J
00e -
`1 Illt
MF["Nk~ 1
1~ S #x; MK
I
i
}
r
r CCMERC IAL "ROLL.-OFF" RATES
I
I •
A $50.00 del Ivory fee Is to be charged to a1I rgrr custanars, j
s
EXISTING pROMM
oPOV TOP
RENT
CC~T~ PER ~ 30 DA! COST COST PER PULL m M6
?0 cu. yd.
$ 39.51 $101.10 $101.00
30 cu. yd. 52.50 I32.70
16?.00
40 cu. yd. 57.75 ?03.60 ?16.00
RENT EXISTING pR0'p~p
P~ ]CST COST
It cu. yd.
$ 07.15 $ 61.Oi $ aa.i0
15 Cu. yd. 19.25 76.15
13.00
?0 cu. yd. 115.50 101.10 108.00
?5 Cup Yd. 115.50 1?7.?5 135.00
! 30 cu. yd. 157.50 15?.70 16?.00
rd 42 cu. yd. 176.40
213.78 ??6.10
I
(Coat par pulls $5.09 x c/y slte)
~ I
rrrepoeed (Coat per pull a $5.40 x c/y •Ise) ( J
i i
i
lsuoso99oo7a (Rev. s/9/9a) '
EMBIT A•?
E ~ 1
f
uAt,:uy, JtidtoK+,t t4'.'u N'.alErti,:ti..r b1. 'r, a::.a. .+e.k: a..!n.ua :.•:re.k,Ldl+<r'.~'lvs'u1'Ji11 .
f
,1
Ile-
i
n:.lvr 11
j
EXCERPT PUS MINUTES 8/2/90
d
J
1
2. Rtyl W PRELIMINARY 1991 90LIQ WASTE RATED.
Nelson explained this was almost the same data as presented
at budget review, this being the official review.
Angelo informed the Board of the proposed 61 residential
solid waste increase. This would maintain the current level
of service. Thompson asked how much of an Increase was
there last year? 1-1/2 1 increase to residential customers
1
at the Landfill.
Charlie Watkins addressed the various cost scenarios
regarding solid waste disposal.
z
Laney asked how our rates compared with the private
collectors. Angelo answered our residential rates were
higher, but the Landfill rates were lower. Thompson asked 6
about the rates to the private commercial collectors who
empty into our Landfill. Angelo said those rates would
increase to $3.00 per cubic yard from $2.85 per cubic yard. y
Nelson explained that we make less than it costs us to
replace the space at our Landfill. He noted that in our s
long range planning for the Landfill, we may need to
establish rated that would encourage the public to use 3
other landfills instead of using our Landfill. Angelo
informed the Board that they are working on this scenario
and should have it ready for presentation to the Board In
the next few months.
ff
LaPorte moved the recommended 6% increase be approved. {
Angelo apprised the Board that the garbage bags that the
City sells are not profitable due to the sales tax increase.
The price needs to be increased to $6.00 per roll. Nelson
informed the Board that this increase was not part of the
proposed solid waste rate Increase, but rather an
administrative operational action necessary to recover
actual cost of providing extra bags.
v
I
77-
r f
r+ wwwe
it
PUB Minutes
Page 3
Frady seconded the motion of LaForte. All ayes, no nays,
uyrc motion carried.
I` 3. REVIEW CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM AND FUTURE OPTIONS.
f Nelson informed the Board that this was a pilot program
dependent upon feasibility, costs, etc. It was proposed to
use the area between Sherman Drive and Stuart Road as the
pilot arse in the City. It is assumed that the program will
Nava a 301 participation rate by the citizens.
Charlie Watkins reviewed the various plans for
implementation of a full scale City-wide curbside collection
program if this pilot program is successful.
t
Plan A included hiring of twc employees, collection of brush }
five days per weeks pick up of racyclables by regular crews
every Wednesday, purchasing six 1 ton trucks with gondolas.
Cost is estimated at $157,000. Advantage, hire only 2 }
employees disadvantages equipment purchase.
Plan B included collecting garbage on Monday and Tuesday
with Thursday and Friday collection of recyclable materials.
This would require three crews on Honday and Tuesday, Cost
estimated at $347,000. Angelo and Watkins showed the board {
the pamphlet on the curbside containers. These would be
used for collection of newspaper, certain plastic
containers, glass, and tin. The containers cost $20/set.
Plan Cl would require the hiring of four employees and have
recyclable collection every day, 5 days per week.
Advantage, purchase less equipment. Cost is $158,000.
Plan C2, would provide recyclable pick up once per week. it
is the most productive plan. It would require the hiring of 3
two people to man the recycling truck. Disadvantage, }
equipment is more expensive, Cost is $162,000.
Thompson asked what we would save in landfill space per
year, Angelo stated approximately 9-131 volume reduction in
residential waste by recycling. Thompson asked if Angelo
was making a recommendation to the Board for approval.
Angelo said no, this was just showing them the caste of the
proposed pilot programs available. As the pilot program
proceeds, the Siff will bring progress reports back eo the
Board and begin formulating more permanent recycling plans.
NMI
1F ~r
f
E
2234L
it
ORDINANCE N0.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON ESTABLISHING RATES FOR RESI-
DENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL SANITATION COLLECTION SERVICES AS AUTHO-
RIZED BY CHAPTER 12 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
DENTONt AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS;
P
SECTION I. That the charger for residential garbage collection 3
ssrv cep as authorized by Section 12-19(b) of Article It of
Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances is hereby established in the
amount of Nine Dollars and 95/100 ($9.95) for each individual
family unit for a thirty (30) day period.
u
SECTION II. That the charges for commercial and institutional g
garbage co ection services, established in accordance with
Section 12-20 of Article III of Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordi-
nances, shall hereafter bet
A. DUMPSTERS
Cubic Yards Rate Per
Collected Per Week Cubic Yard Per Week
1-3 $8.93
4-6 6.92
7-10 6.66
11-25 6.52
26-50 6.47
T 51-100 6.29
101-125 6.02
126-150 5.93
151-175 5.65
176 or more 5.47
B. OPEN TOP CONTAINERS AND COMPACTORS
Type of Rent
Container Per 30 Days Service Charge
20 cubic yard open top $ 39.53 $5.40 per cubic yard
30 cubic yard open top 52.50 5.40 per cubic yard
40 cubic yard open tap 57.75 5.40 per cubic yard
12 cubic yard compactor 87.15 5.40 per cubic yard
15 cubic yard compactor 69.25 5.40 per cubic yard
20 cubic yard compactor 115.50 5.40 per cubic yard
25 cubic yard compactor 115,50 5,40 per cubic yard
30 cubic yard compactor 157.50 5,40 per cubic yard
42 cubic yard compactor 176.40 5.40 per cubic yard
I
I
,
1
}
t
I V
{ 1
A delivery fee of $50.00 per container will be charged to all
new customers for open top containers and compactors.
SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective im-
mediately upon is passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
1490.
y
BOB CA8 LEBERfio MAVOR
I
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTER$, CITY SECRETARY
BY:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA APANI DRAYOVITC81 CITY ATTORNEY
i
f
I
' i
I
I
PAGE 2
I ~ I
ti~ y
f * i
FFFFF
r
I
CITY
` COUNCIL
k
I.. F
F1 1. 1
F. I
I
M.M
T1 I T1.
I T1.
p
I
a
°
f ~ d
i
}
IF,
1
1
1
n, ns~
Y
i
j
September 18, 1990
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 4
TO: MAYOR & MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: LLOYD V. HARRELL, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: CGNSIDER ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING
RATES FOR THE USE OF THE CITY'S SANITARY LANDFILL
SITE.
RECOMMENDATION:
The iublic Utilities Board, at their meeting of August
2, 1990, recomme.,ded to the City Council, approval of
subject 6% increase.
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND:
The City Council reviewed the item during the work
session of 9-4-90. As presented to the Public Utilities
Board on May 9, 1990, and again on August 2, 19901 the
Solid Waste budget for the 1990-91 fiscal year includes
a 6% rate increase for residential, commercial and the
majority of landfill fee. The rate increase is
necessary in order for the Department to maintain
current levels of service and to provide for the minor
expansion of some programs to meet new demands placed
an the Department. In effect, the proposed increases
will generate approximately $200,432 in a4ditional r
funds for the Department.
Relative to cur landfill usage rates, the 6% increase
would be applied to all customers except those
involving automobile or standard truck usage. The F
price per cubic yard for materials disposed at the
landfill would increase from $2.81 per cubic yard to
$3.00 per cubic yard.
9
a
p
~ PIi 11E~
p~
! M
Y
t
r
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
LJ I
Solid Waste Customers, Solid Waste Division, Legal
Department, Public Utilities Hoard, City Council, ,
Denton Municipal Utilities.
Respectfully,
lokV rrell
City Manager
APPROVED BY:
F
R. E. NELSON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES
PREPARED BY:
EFL DI TOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES
EXHIBIT I. Minutes PUB Meeting 8/2/90
II. Proposed ordinance
~r
t
a ~ r
{
{
EXCERPT PUB MINUTES 8/2/90
r~
~ i
7. RcVIEW PRELIMINARY 1991 SOLID WASTE A TE .
N
Nelson explained this was almost the same data as presented
at budget review, this being the official review,
Angelo informed the Board of the proposad 6% residential
solid waste increase. This would maintain the current level
of service. Thompson asked how much of an increase was
there last year? 1-1/2 1 Increase to residential customers
at the Landfill.
ti
Charlie Watkins addressed the various cost. scenarios
regarding solid waste disposal.
Laney asked how our rates compared with the private
collectors. Angelo answered our residential rates were
higher, but the Landfill rates were lower. Thompson asked j
about the rates to the private commercial collectors who
empty into our Landfill. Angelo said those rates would
increase to $3.00 per cubic yard from $2,85 per cubic yard. y
Nelson explained that we make less than it costs us to j
replace the space at our Landfill. He noted that in our
long range planning for the Landfill, we may need to
establish rates that would encourage the public to us•
other landfills Instead of using our Landfill. Angelo
j informed the Board that they are working on this scenario 1
and should have it ready for preRentation to the Board in
the next few nonths.
LaForte moved the recommended 61 increase be approved.
;i
Angelo apprised the Board that the garbage bags that the
City sells are not profitable due to the sales tax increase.
The price needs to be increased to $6,00 per roll. Nelson s~
informed the Board that this increase was not part of the
proposed solid waste rata increase, but rather an 1
administrative operational action necessary to recover
actual cost of providing extra bags.
i
I
il
r i
1
I
,
f
r
5 _
i
PUB Minutes
Page 3
Frady seconded the motion of LaForte- All ayes, no nays,
motion carried.
3• REVIEW CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM AND FUTURE OPTIONS.
Nelson informed the Board that this was A pilot program
Usienthe arean befoasibilityo Sherman costs
It was proposed to
Drive etc.
and Stuart Road as the
Pilot area in the City. It is assumed that the program will
haw a 301 participation rate by the citizens.
Charlie Watkins reviewed the various plans for
Implementation of a full scale Clty-wide curbelde collection
program if this pilot program is successful. {
Plan A included hiring of two employees, collection of brush
five days per week, pick up of recyclable$ by regular crews
every Wedneeday, purchasing six 1 ton trucks with gondolas, j
C04t is estimated at :1570000. Advantage, hire only 2
employees; disadvantage, squipment ;
purchase,
Plan 0 Included collectiog garbage on Monday and Tuesday ti
with Th4raday and Friday collection of recyclable materials, t
This would require three crews on Monday and Tuesda , Cost
estimated at =317,000. Angelo and Watkins showed tFyta
the pamphlet on the curbride containers, These wou dabs {
containers, glass, andntIn, of aer,
used for $20/set,
Theeeontslnirs contain plastic
Plan Cl would require the hiring of four employees and have `
recyclable collection every day, 5 days
Advantage, purchase less equipment. Cost to per week'
!
~ $158,000.
Plan C2, would provide recyclable pick up once per week. It
is the most productive plan. It would require the hiring of
two people to man the recycling truck. Disadvantage,
squlpment is more expensive. Cost is ;161,000.
Thompson asked what we would save In landfill space per
year. Angelo stated approximately 9.131 volume reduction in
residential waste by recycling, Thompson asked if Angelo
was making a recommendation to the Board for a
Angelo said no, this was just showing them the costs pofvthe `
proposed pilot programs available. As the pilot program
Bating begithensformultaff will reports
recycling ans, ~ ~I
plans.
s
1 IVY^IMJ~ v ~J•
1992L
r
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON ESTABLISHING RATES FOR THE USE
OF THE CITY'S SANITARY LANDFILL SITE AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 12
OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the charges for the use of the City's land-
fill s authorized by section 12-5 of article 1 of chapter
12 of the Code of Ordinances shall hereafter be as follows:
A. INDIVIDUAL USERS t
1
Charge Per
Type of Vehicle Vehicle Per Load
i
1. Automobiles and station wagons, pickup $ 3.00 e
trucks less than one-half ton, (such as
Bronco II's and similar size vehicles).
2. Motor vehicles with a carrying $ 10.00
load capacity of 2 cubic yards
less than 5 cubic yards (such as
one-half ton pickups, single axle
Blazers and Suburbans).
3. Pickup trucks with side boards $ 30.00
and all other vehicles with a
carrying capacity in excess of 5
cubic yards but lase than 10 cubic
yards
4. Vehicles with carrying capacity $ 45.00
in excess of 10 cubic yards
but less than 15 cubic yards
5. Vehicles with carrying capacity $ 60.00
in excess of 15 cubic yards
but lees than 20 cubic yards
6. Vehicles with carrying capacity 90.00
in excess of 20 cubic yards i
but less than 30 cubic yards
7. Vehicles with carrying capacity $120.00
in excess of 30 cubic yards but
less than 40 cubic yards }
8. Vehicles with carrying capacity of $150.00
40 cubic yards or more.
1
P
i
.
r
B. REGULAR COMMERCIAL USERS
The City Manager may enter into contracts with private
commercial collection service companies for regular use of the
sanitary landfill site at the following rates:
Residential & commercial
garbage $3.00 cubic yard or $12.00/ton 3
c
Rubbish (trash) $3.00 cubic yard or $12.00/ton
Uncompacted residential &
commercial garbage $3.00 cubic yard or $12.00/ton
I
All such contracts may contain such conditions of operation, dis- i
posal and delivery as necessary for the efficient operation of the
landfill site and the nothod of billing and collecting for such
use.
SECTION It. That landfill permits issued by the City prior
f to t eh~fecti've date of this ordinance may be redeemed for their 1
face value. The customer must pay the difference between the rl
current rate and the face value of the permit. The customer is
` not entitled to a refund if the face value of the permit exceeds
the current rate.
SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval. t
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1990. t
BOB CASTLEDERRYO MAYOR
I~ ATTEST: F
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
I
BY:
f ~
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAYt DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY: . I
PAGE 2 S
e
1
rf
II
a
YA
r i.:' f f
i
CITY
CQUNCIL
'Lp
~or0a~
4. ` tiro
O ` t
0
c~o
I
a
-
I
a
F~M
k A
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
70: Mayor and Members of the City Council r
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: No Parking on the south side of West Oak Street
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval
SUMMARY:
This ordinance prohibits parking on the south side of West Oak
Street, from its intersection with Denton Street to a point 77
feet east of the east right-of-way line of Denton Street, r
BACKGROUND:
r
When vehicles are parked on the said section of West Oak 7
Street, it impairs the line of sight of the driver on the
northbound approach of Denton Street at its intersection with :r
West Oak Street,
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTSI OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Engineering 6 Transportation Division
FISCAL IMPACT:
j The cost of one mounted "No Parking" sign - approximately $65,00
I
0773s
i
i
j
{
1
1
r= CTSSC MINUTES
I
' July 9, 1990
page 2
II' ITEM 13 REQUEST FOR NO PARKING ON W. OAK STREET:
` Iwuchukwu presented the request. He said that the request was
discussed in the June 18th meeting. Mr. Mike Cochran who Is not in
favor of No Parking was not present at the meeting. He said he was
not notified when the meeting was rescheduled. Wiien cars are parked
on the south aide of Oak Street east of the Denton Street
intersection, traffic on the northbound approach of Denton Street
cannot see on-coming westbound traffic on Oak Street. The parked
cars create a blind corner forcing northbound traffic on Denton
street to advance well into the intersection to be able to evaluate
traffic conditlone. This type situation could lead to very serious
accidents. In 1989, five accidents were reported at this
interoection and all of them were right angle collisions. Observed
speed on oak within the intersection area is tremendously high and
could worsen an already bad situation. The potential for a very
serious accident cannot be overemphasized.
Staff feels a good way to solve this problem is by prohibiting
parking on the south aide of oak Street a good distor.ce east of
Denton Street. The owners of the southeast corner lot at the
intersection (619 W. oak), Mr. and Mrs. Pat Carey, are in favor of
'no parking' on the south side of the street in front of their
property. The east property line of this lot is 77 feet from the 3
east right-of-way line of Denton Street. If this section of the
south side of west Oak is made 'no parking', it would help eliminate
the eight distance problem that currently exists at the Denton
Street intersection.
a
Mike Cochran at 609 W. Oak Street came forward %nd addressed the
commission, He said he did not perceive it to be a tad corner. The
Police Department told his, there had been only five accidents at
this location since 1988. The problems at the corner are one of
enforcement rather than safety issues, There is a speeding problem ,
as care come off Carroll onto Oak. Also the curb level is almost
level to the street making it invisible to see the 20' limit where
the parking zone existed. This seems to have compounded the problem
of people parking closer to the intersection. ~i
( 1
Cochran asked that the commission postpone the decision of no 'parking because of a couple changes occurring. The street is under
construction and the corner will be changed, it in his J
,nderstanding that the radius will be changed to 20'. The curb will
also be raised. This will make no parking at the intersection
radius more visible. There is a distinct possibility that this
would affect the situation.
He said the question of the sight triangle mentioned earlier is a
fine engineering theory but why would any corner in the city that
has a 20' setback be any different. If this corner is dangerola
because it only has a 20' setback for parking, corners wick zieilar
situations should be handled the same.
There is a multi-famtly complex at this location and there is not
enough room to park so they park on the street. After the street is
redone, the problem may have been solved. 1
1 ~ ;1
3
i
5 r~,
CTSSC MINUTES Rr
July 9, 1990
page 3
r
r
Sarah Carey at 619 W, oak came forward to speak in favor of no
parking. She said there is a certain amount of visibility
irritation at this location. If an individual were in a larger
vehicle such as the Surburban Mr. Cochran drives, there would be no
visibility problem. if onsite parking was provided by all
apartments/complexes as they had done, the problem would be
alleviahed,
iwuchukwu acid a lot of accidents probably happen at the
"TM` intersection that go unreported. Engineering construction
improvements will not help the eight clearance problem at all.
Minor operational improvements such as proposed by staff are the
most cost effective means of eliminating such potential liabilities.
Cochran said he had spoken with the City Attorney about the
liability. One of the individuals in an accident at the
intersection had threatened suit to the city, but the City Attorney
said it was not a valid s,ait,
Coronado said a lot of complaints are received during school time by I
individuals who drop off their children at Calhoun Junior High.
Smith reviewed the accident reports presented by staff and stated
that only one appeared to be a direct result of view obstruction at p I
the intersection. Cochran agreed, jJ
Smith said she believed the request should br tabled until after the r'
1
street construction is complete and then revitw the situation,
STAMP RECOMMENDED: Approval of no parking
COMMISSiONERSS Amador made a motion to accept staff recommendation,
Motion passed with Guess, Gore, and Amador voting In
favor, Gohlke abstained and Smith voted against the
recommendation.
ITEM 04. GENERAL BUSINESS!
Iwuchukwu said that the study on loading zones was almost complete, f
Staff would be meeting with the committee and the results will be
presented at the next CTSSC meeting on August 6,
i
Meeting adjourned at 600 p,m. 4
{
i
S
~.a
r
i
i
GBB6E
J
1
r
M! ' A.YM1,. ~ 1
COW
n
0 vow
ONO
06014 B. jofn*0 • ''1:
ASO
v
Cf
94
171
e ,
I
qQ' aI
GIo w1
' y
10
~ V, I L
1
IVA
r i
. II
~I
1
i
~vs. rw' wr
1f[ ~
e .
~r
i
273'2L
z
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROHIBITING THE PARK-
ING OF VEHICLES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WEST OAK STREET, FROM YTS
INTERSECTION ',ITH DENTON STREET TO A POINT 77 FEET EAST OF THE
asy EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF DENTON STREET, FOR A DISTANCE OF 77
FEETI PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE= PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO
EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS: AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. When signs are erected giving notice thereof, no
person eiaTI park a vehicle at anytime upon the following street
or portion thereof, in the City of Denton, to-wit:
The south side of Wkast Oak Street, from its intersec-
tion with Denton Street-to a point 77 feet east of the
East right-of-way line of Denton Street, for a distance
of 77 feet, i
I (
E
SECTION II. That if any section, subsection, paragraph,
sentence, cause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or applica-
tion thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by
any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance,
and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby de-
clares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any
such invalidity.
SECTION iii. Any person who shall violate a provision of k
this or-`dinance# or fails to comply therewith or with any of the
requirements thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued
{ thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a r
fine not exceeding Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00). Each such A
person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and r
every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this
ordinance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any
such violations such person shall be punished within the limits
above.
SECTION IV, That this ordinance shall become effective
fourteen days from the date of its passage, and the City
Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordi-
nance to be published twice in the Denton Record -Chronicle, the
official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10)
days of the date of its passage,
t
v
PASSED AND APPROVED this .he day of 1990,
BOB CASTLEBERRYr NUOR t
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERSt CITY SECRETARY
BY:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH# CITY ATTORNEY II
1
8Y WIN.,
J 1
PAGE 2 i r
1
9 N I
f
CITY
COUNCIL
IiR
t! A I
4
i
j I
1
~ h rtl
C 1
0
04(JC GGOC~
I
1
i ~ 4 a
J R{1"W1~ '1 1
0
Y
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Ordinance for "No Parking" on U.S. Highway 380 East
RECOMMENDATION:
,vd Staff recommends approval
SUMMARY:
This ordinance prohibits parking on both sides of U.S. Highway
380 East, from its intersection with Riverside Drive to its
intersection with Rock Hill Road.
II
BACKGROUND: 1
The subject area is the long chain of bridges just west of the a
easy City limits. It is a two-lane roadway and people park
their vehicles on the bridge shoulders while fishing. This
creates obstruction and a potential for serious accidents.
t
NOTE: The provision for towing at owner's expense as
I~ recommended by the Citizens Traffic Safety Commission was
removed by the City Attorney's office. They say that provision
is covered by State Law under Texas Revised Civil Status
1 Annotated art. 67014, section 94.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
l Engineering & Traffic Division
FISCAL IMPACT:
Zero. The State has posted signs and will place additional
signs if needed.
i
33€
~ t
i
0773E '
i
A
a
MINUTES
roll 41, i Cltirens Traffic Safety Support Commission
July 9, 1990
PRESENT: Carl Guess, Alice Core, Mike Amador, Marilyn Smith, and Gene Gohlke,
4 Chairman
ABSENT: Doug Chadwick and John Erwin
I STAFF: Paul Iwuchukwu, Traffic Engineer and CTSSC Liaison
Manual Coronado, Traffic Foreman
Capt. Dotson, Police Department
ITEM E1 APPROVE MINUTES OF JUNE 18s 1990:
Alice Gore made a motion to approve the minutes as written. Carl
Guess seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously.
ITEM f] REQUEST FOR NO PARKING ON U.S. 380 EAST:
Paul Iwuchukwu presented the request. He said that Ma. Amy
Plumadore of 105 1/2 Avenue A requested 'no parking' on the long
series of bridges on U.S. 380 East toward the east city limits. She
said people park their vehicles along that section of U.S6 380 while
fishing in area waters. This creates obstruction and potential for
serious accidents, that section of U.S. 380 being a high speed akea
(55 mph).
t
Me. Plumadore has already presented this request to the City
Council, but the council referred the case to this Commission.
Already, the State Highway Department has posted some temporary
signs prohibiting parking except for emergency situations.
Permanent 'no parking' signs will be posted as soon as an ordinance
is in place.
Marilyn Smith asked where the fishermen would park. Iwuchukwu said
anywhere on the shoulders of U.Sa 380 west of Riverside Drive until
the flood recedes from parking area near the west bridge heads
L I j Capt. Dotson asked that the ordinance include that vehicles will be
JI towed at owners expenses Iwuchukwu said staff would include that in
their recommendation as wells
STAFF RECOMMENDED: Smith m'sde a motion to approve the request with the r
I
addition of 'vehicles will be towed at owners expense's }
This would also need to be on the nignage at the
locations Gohlke seconded the motion. Motion passed
unanimously.
S ~
d ~
i I
1
I
i
I
I
r ,
♦jr I ~L
t
an as
pit
trr
{ ` r!•• h •'►k' rte` •sa
~r 1
1
vu,
~ s
r
Ali .r~ • ~ '
T " f1•. r~ ~ , • • ~ 1 ~ •
•
C•II
4ft
STN ; • ~ i
' 1 ~ T!I•H ' ~ r
1-6
41 Im
r
Aft
~ y Ir V
4 `
Lae. lie Cal'
' ul,,ot`
X' •
i
1
~r
,
"s
2732L
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROHIBITING THE PARK-
ING OF VEHICLES ON BOTH SIDES OF U.S. HIGHWAY 380 EAST{ FROM
RIVERSIDE DRIVE TO ROCK HILL ROAD; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS)
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. When signs are erected giving notice thereof, no
person a =Park a vehicle at anytime upon the following street
or portion thereof, in the City of Denton, to-wit:
i
Both sides of U.S. Highway 380 Bast, from Riverside
Drive to Rock Hill Road. r
1
SECTION II. That if any section, subsection, paragraph,
sentence, cause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or applica-
tion thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by
any court of competent juriadiction, such holding shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance,
and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby de-
clares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any
such invalidity.
SECTION III. Any person who shall violate a provision of
this ordinance, or foils to comply therewith or with any of the
requirements thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued
1i shall b
be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable a
thereunder,
fine not exceeding Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00). Each such
person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and
every day or portion thereof during which any violation of thin
ordinance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any
such violations such person shall be punished within the limits i
above.
y
N IV. That this ordinance shall become effective
fOar eenSECTIO ays from the date of its passage, and the city
aecretr.ry is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordi-
nance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the
official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10)
days Of the date of its passage.
F
f
i
,
PASSED AND APPROVED this tl:e day of 1990.
BOB CASTLEBERRY* MAYOR
3
ATTEST: i
JENNIFER WALTERSi CITY SECRETARY
t~
BY'
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM'
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCHi CITY ATTORNEY
BY
C
t
i
1
PAGE 2
i
1
-Ammar
ca
ME.
1 f
1 17.
CITY
o I H'.
COUNCIL
h
=MT
I T:
I it: :m: X
71.
~I
11 I
k
Y
hf
V f
71
{
p
O ,
b
0 of
rr I
X: '1ZEN
AAM~
F
Q
5 ~
CITY of DENTON, TWUS 215E. MCKINNEYI DENTON, TEXAS 762011 TELEPHONE (817) 5B84M
.
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 14, 1990
3
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
I
FROM: John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance
SUBJECT: YEAR-END BUDGET ADJUSTMENT.
Flease find attached a Resolution providing for 1989-90 year-end
budget adjustments. This Resolution has been prepared pursuant
to the nine (9) month budget analysis report submitted to City
Council in mid-July. Modifications have been made based upon
expenditures through the end of August, and the need for
numerous adjustments has decreased due to expenditure
I curtailments. ;i
With regard to the General Fund, it is estimated that the Fund j
will remain in a positive position at year end. As noted in the
earlier nine Of month report to Council, adjustments are
necessary primarily due to salary over expenditures for overtime 4
and salary savings due to position vacancies.
Please advise if i can answer any questions regarding these
adjustments.
y'I
JFMcG:af
Attachment
5416F
k
_I
. j .f
f ff
1
r ~
T ~ 1
M
r
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989-907
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
SECTION 1. The budget adjustments, as indicated on Exhibit
"A", attached hereto and included by reference herein, for the
fiscal year 1989-90 are hereby, in all things, approved and
ratified.
$SCTIOH-- . That this resolution shall become effective 3
immediately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1990.
BOB CASTLESERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BYs
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY: E C C"1_t/l.lt
budget.ord
i
r
i
f
u
ro
7
w~
EX1QBrr A
FISCAL YEAR 1989-W
YEAR-END BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
GENERAL FUND
CURmw INCR (DECk) MODMD
DENEItAL FUND EXPENDI'LUREB BUDOET AWUSTMENT BIID(i1;1
i4 OENERAL GOVERNMENT DEPT. $464,971 ($4,000) $460971
CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPT. 113,523 4,000 117,523
M FINANCE DEPT. 2,259381 (47,%0) 2,211,661
' INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT. 1,033.828 (10,000) 1,023.821 J
AIRPORT DEPT. 96,511 2,500 99,081
FIRE DEPT. 4,809,593 115,000 4,924,59)
POLICE DEPT. 3,457,612 (60,000) 5,397,612
SO
NV OEM" FUND AWUSfMBNT ;
I~
I ,
Ii 1
l
i 77
I. M.
CITY
COUNCIL }
{
i
1
' bf
4 °
6 t~
00 of
I: °~nQCO Ga~'~~~
r
I I
J
i i
yj,y.Mr
r■■■ 1 f
C 11
Wt^N~ Ill
N ti•
r~
'~ra
September 18, 1590
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Consider resolution on the Memorandum of Agreement
(MOA) with the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for
establishing operation procedures for Lewisville
Hydroelectric Project, FERC Number 3940.
RECONNENDATION '
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of August 15, 6
1990, recommended to the City Council approval of the minor
changes of the subject agreement.
SUMMARY
on December 5, 1989, Denton's City Council approved this
MOA. On February 9, 19901 the Corps recommended minor
changes to the operation plan and the attached regulating
plan of the executed MOA. Under Article III (Cooperation),
subsections 2 and 3, of the operation plan, Denton agrees to
provide the Corps' Reservoir Control Section with daily
project data by 8:30 a.m. each day. This data shall consist
of the 8:00 a.m. release rate in cubic feet per second, mean
daily turbine and bypass release for the period midnight to `
midnight. Denton agrees to notify the Corps' Reservoir
Control Section within one hour of a unit shutdown. The
Corps shall provide Denton with home phone numbers for use
during non-duty hours. Under the regulating plan, the Corps
is requesting that Denton shall regulate water flow through y
the low flow valves under the instructions of the Corps.
J`
PROGRAMS, DEPARTKUM OR GROUPS AFFSCTBD
Electric costs for Water and Sewer rate payers, Electric
Utility Department for maintenance and operation.
08160075
;a
Ile W -'.7
67,
S
M
Corps MOA
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT 4
The total estimated cost of the project is $50064,000. The
hydro unit will generate approximately 13,000,000 kwh
annually. }
Res,a fully submitted,
L1 y V. Harrell
City Manager
Prepared by,
' i
Ch rr , P. E.
lectric Engineerin
Approved by,
R. E. Ne eon, Execut vie ~ '
Director of Utilities
;I
Attachments: I. Operating Agreement
II. Resolution
III. PUS Minutes
ti
'I
08090071
I
08160075 r
I
t
1
2839L
t
r
RESOLUTIvN NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,
CORPS OF ENGINEERS ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR HYDROPOWER OPERA-
TION AT LEWISVILLE DAM; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES:
SECTION I. The City Manager is authorized to execute an +
agreementween the City of Denton and the Department of the
Army, Corps of Engineers establishing procedures for hydropower
operation by the City of Denton under the terms and conditions
contained in the agreement attached hereto.
SECTION II. That Resolution No. R89-015 is repealed.
y
SECTION 111. That this resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval. J
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
! 1990.
50B CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
i
i
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
1
.
APPROV£0 AS TO LEGAL FOAM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
~YVL~n/w
BY $
i
r,
1
EXHIBIT Lmm"
V
1
rMr M. ~ l
41 f
K ; tir'r= II
3
` r
n
f
u
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR HYDROPOWER
OPERATION BY THE CITY OF DENTON
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL ENERSY REGULATORY
COMMISSION LICENSE-
EXISTING DAN FERC PROJECT NO. 3940
This Agreement, entered into this day of ,
19_ by and between the DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Corpse
Enneers {hereinafter referred to as the "Corps", acting by and
through the Southwestern Division Cosmander, and the City of
Denton, Texas (hereinafter referred to as the "COD'), acting by
and through its City Manager, w
WITNESSETH, THAT:
WHEREAS, the United States is the owncr and operator of o
Lewisville Lake, the associated lands and appurtenant works
located on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River, a navigable
waterway of the United States in Denton County, Texas; and,
W I3tZAS, COD Has issued a license on March 27, 1984 by the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FEttC) to construct,
operate and Waintsin hydroelectric facility, project number
3940, at Lewisville Dan located on the Elm Fork above
Lewisville, Texas; and
WEEREABe the Fort Worth District Corps of Engineers is
responsible for thn daily operation and integrity of Lewisville
Dam; and
WHEREAS, Article 39 of the PFAC t,icense requires COD to
= enter into Memorandum of Agreement with the Corps, describing
the mode of hydropower operation, design, and construction as
acceptable to the Corps; and
j
EXH IBITA,....
s
Mew
r
t
LEC'SVILLE OPERATING PLAN
PAGE 2
WHEREAS, COD has entered into Supplemental Agreement No. 1
an December 14, 1988, with the City of Dallas to amend the
Untreated Water Contract which is dated August 7, 1985.
According to the supplemental agreement, Dallas will not
exercise its right to transport water in a pipeline from
Lewisville Lake to Elm Fork Water Treatment Plant, until the
year 2005. Dallas will not object to Denton's installaticn of a
hydroelectric turbine generator on the Lewisville Lake low flow
conduits which are utilised by the City of Dallas for water
supply releaseni and
WHEREAS, COD agrees to provide at no cost to Dallas a blind
flange connection upstream from the hydroelectric unit for
Dallas to connect a pipeline for Dallas' future use; and
i
NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree na followsi
ARTICLE 1 - RIGHT TO REVIEW AND REVISE
The Corps and COD recognize that this Operating Agreement
is subject to review from time-to-time upon request of
either party as operating experience is gained and
conditions warrant.
This Operating Agreement shall remain in effect until
revised by mutual consent.
y~
ARTICLE II - PHYSICAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The 8ydropower Project, described In the FERC licensee
Includes one 2,128 kw horizontal-axis hydroelectric
generating unit. An outdoor-type substation is located
adjacent to the powerhouse to step up the generator
voltage to 24.9 kv.
The powerhouse is to be located approximately 55 feet v
east of the existing discharge channel to the Elm Fork
River. The outsLde dimensions of the main powerhouse are
approximately 4:1. feet wide by 42 feet long. The penstock
w 11 consist of two 60-inch diameter pipes running from
N
R
n
r
k
LEWISVILLE OPERATING PLAN
PAGE 3
I
the existing outlet works valve pit. The two 60-inch
diameter penstock will converge to a single 84-inch
i diameter penstock running to the turbine inlet. A tailrace
will be required to direct turbine discharges through the
niw channel to Elm Ferk River.
ARTICLE TT_r ^ COOPERATION
1. COD agrees to Operate the Hydropower Project according
to the Corps operating requirements. The Hydropower Project
will be operated to protect Federal interests, including,
but not limited to, the flood control impoundment and
flood release capability of Lewisville Dam. The Corps I
agrees to cooperate in the operation of the Hydropower 1
Project, provided such operation is consistent with
Federal interests and with the Corps' responsibilities for x
maintaining the flood control function of the project.
The Corps shall inform COD of all release rates through the
hydroelectric project.
2. COD agrees to provide the Corps Reservoir Control
Section with daily project data by 0830 hours each day.
This data shall consist of the 0800 hours release rate in
cubic feet per second (CFS), the mean daily turbine and f
bypass release for the period midnight to midnight in day
second feet (Dsr), and the number of hours of gennration
and megawatt hours of generation from midnight to midnight. {
3. COD agrees to notify the Corps Reservoir Control
within Section provide homephone numbers for unit sduringnnon-duty rhours.
ARTICLES IV - OPERATIONAL REQUIREKENTS
SECTION A. GENERAL
COD agrees that Lewisville Lake is presently being operated
for flood control, water conservation, and recreation
purposes. The City of Dallas is perc;itted to request normal
water supply releases from the conservation pool. That
requested releases are affected through the operation of
the control valves on the two 60 - Inch flow discharge
}
I
a
1
~a R~• lRM IE 'I
l F7
i
f
Z
,y
JJJaij f a;'.,; .
{
LEWISVILLE OPERATING PLAN
PAGE 4
pipes. At Lake stages above the top of the conservation
pool (elevation 522.0 N.G.V.D.), the Corps takes over all
control of lake releases. The proposed hydroelectric
installation would generate energy from flows released for
` the lake multipurpose operation. The proposed operation of
`t,#VrF hydroelectric powerhouse shall not modify the existing
release rates for the Lewisville Lake.
In order to meet the Contractual obligations under Contract
No. DA41-443-ENG-2453 for downstream water supply
requirements o t e pity of Dallas, the Corps retains
control over the releases from the Project. Should the
required releases not be effected through the turbine, the
Corps retains the right to make said releases through the
i
Corps' low flow outlet works.
SECTION B. SPECIFIC OPERATIONAL DETAILS
1. The Corps is responsible for the operation of i
Lewisville Dam and Lake. Under this operating Agreement,
the Texas Water Commission, and the supplemew,il agreement
No. 1 with Dallas, the Hydro l,roject shall be operated as a j
run-of-river project. The Corps shall control the existing
Corps' valves remotely from the Lewisville project tower
house
Hydroelectric Plant operation shall be fully automatic
using a Supervisory control system for the wicket gates,
turbine/generator, and bypass valve. The remote control
system will allow COD to monitor releases through the
powerhouse.
2. After a through review of the application for a
license under part 1 of the Federal Power Act, the design
of the Hydropower Project is consistent with the
engineering standards governing dam safety. An environment
assessment was issued with a finding cf no significant
impact on the environment , and FERC also concluded that
the Hydropower Project is properly designed to
compprehensively develop the hydropower potential of
Lewisvills Dtm and Lake, and the Elm Fork River.
3. Attachment 1 "Regulating Plan" summarizes the
r
i
J
I
1
r
1
k
LLt4~
f~
b
LEWISVILLE OPERATING PLAN
PAGE 5
operation modes during normal, high, and flood releases.
The method of release will depend upon the elevation of the
lake; whether the release is for conservation or flood
control; and whether the flow rate is usable for
generation.
4. COD agrees to notify the Corps as soon as possible
whenever the generating unit has a forced outage.
5. COD agrees to permit the Corps to take whatever
emergency action is needed to prevent or reduce a hazard to
human life, and to prevent significant fluctuation of ?
Lewisville Reservoir.
6. The Corps has the authority to direct COD to stop
Hydropower Project operation so that maintenAncs or
repairs may be affected to any part of the outlet works and
outlet works channel, should such be deemed necessary. The
Corps will provide as much prior notice as possible for any 3
such outage.
?i
'i
ARTICLE V - INSPECTION a
COD shall permit the Corps to inspect the Hydropower
Project as a part of the Corps' Periodic Inspection and
Continuing Evaluation of Completed Civil Works Structure
program. Any operational defloleneies or difficulties
I detected by the Corps will be immediately reppoorted to COD
and YERC. when operational practices or defioleneiea may
result in a situation causing imminent danger to the Corps
operation, thn Corps has the authority to direct COD to
stop Hydropower Project operation and/or take appropriate
action to resolve the problem.
ARTICLE VI - COMMUNICATION NVMRX, INFORMATION EXCHANGE,
j
AND REPORTING ~
COD agrees to maintain communications between the Corps
operating personnel by moans of a direct circuit or other
direct meant of communications, as directed by the
District, to coordinate the operation of Hydropower Project.
k
• ja
. i
~y
3
LEWISVILLE OPERATING PLAN
PACE 6
ARTICLE VII - MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES
1. Responsibilities for maintenance of various facilities
associated with the Sydropower Project will be divided
between COD and the Corps as follows.
A. COD will maintain at its sole coat the followings
1. Powerhouse and substation, including the
fenced area of the sites a
2. New penstock at all times, and the Corps'
parking lot when damaged or disrupted by
activities of COD; yy
3
3. The powerhouse discharge channels
4. Any signs or public information facilities
constructed by COD for its purposes.
5. All maintenance to the existing Corps Outlet
Works Structure and Conduit, Stilling Basin,
and Discharge Channel resulting from
operation of the hydropower facilities.
B. The Corps will maintain at its sole cost the
followings
1. Recreation and public access facilities,
including signs, trails, stairs,
observation/fishing platforms, restrooms and
parking lots, whether original or
constructed by COD as part of the Bydropower
Project;
2. Any signs or public information facilities
constructed for the Corps' benefit;
3. The normal maintenance of the existing Outlet 1
Works Structure and Condult, Stilling Basin
and Discharge Channels
2. Nothing in this agreement will preclude COD or the I
i
LEWISVILLE OPERATING PLAN
PAGE 7
Corps from contracting with each other to perform specific
maintenance activities, regardless of which agency is
ultimately responsible for the cost.
ARTICLE VIII - OTHER PROVISION
Nothing in this operating Agreement shall be deemed as a waiver W
of any requirement or obligation set forth in the Order Issuing y
License Issued March 27, 1984 by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Cossmissiori, or any amendments to the license.
.p~
UNITED STATES CITY OF DENTON
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
BY1 BYr
Robert C. Lee Lloyd Harrell
Brigadier General, U.S.A. City Manager
Division Engineer City of Denton, Texas
Attachments Regulating Plan
11/9/89
LLOPAGR 1
t
r_1 ~ 11
F M41
r 4
A
P
a
ATTACHMENT I
REGULATING PLAN
FOR
LEWISVILLE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
"s
5
p
This Regulating Plan has been prepared as part of the plans and
specifications for the Lewisville Hydroelectric Project, in
accordance with Article 39 of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission ("FERC") license for the Lewisville Hydroelectric
Project No. 3940 Issued March 27, 1984, and extonded until March
27, 1988. To meet the Corps of Engineers requirement, the City
of Denton had entered into Supplemental Agreement No. 1 on
Dece"er 14, 1988, with the City of Dallas to amend the Untreated
Water Contract which is dated August 71 1985. The plan is
divided into two sectionst section i describes design modes
f during operation of the Lewisville Hydroelectric Project, and
Section II describes reservoir flow diversion and regulation
requirements for operations of Lewisville Lake during
construction of the Hydroelectric Project.
~I
I
1
r _
Owl
r
r LEWISVILLE REGULATING P1AN
Page 2
I
I. REGULATING PLAN DURING OPERATION
A. General
The Lewisville hydroelectric project will have ten
release modes: low, operating, operating and spill,
flood, low-to-operating, operating-to-low, operating-to
operating and spill, operating and spill-to-operating,
h operating and spill-to-flood, and flood-to-operating
and spill. These modes are discussed below.
B. Low Flow Mode
°t
During low flow mode, less than 150 cfs, releases will t
be passed through the Corps outlet works. In this
mode, the various parts of the facility identified
below will be in the status indicated:
Part of Facility Status/Party Responsible
1. Outlet work intake structure open/Corps
slide gates.
2. 16-foot flood control conduit
Closed/Corps +
3. Two 4B-inch Corps valves Open/Corps
4. Two 60 inch COD valves Closed*/Denton
5. Turbine/generator off/Denton
6. 36-inch bypass valve closed/Denton i
* Optional-May be left open
i
C, Operating Mode
During the normal operating made, 150 to 623 cfs,
i releases will be passed through the turbine. In this
mode, the various parts of the facility identified
below will be in the status indicated: I
Part of
Facility Status/Party Responsible
1. Outlet works intake Open/Corps
structure slide gates
2. 16-foot flood control conduit Closed/Corps
3. Two 48-inch Corps valves Closed/Corps
4, Two 60-inch COD valves open/Denton
5. Turbine/Generator On Denton
6. 36-inch bypass valve Closed/Denton
I
f~f
Ile-
LEWISVILLE REGULATING PLAN
Page 3
D. Operating And Spill Model
During high releases greater than 623 cfa and less than
3.,000 cfs, releases will be passed through the Corps
outlet works and turbine. In this mode, the various
parts of the facility identified below will be in the
status indicatedi
A
Part of Facility Status/Party Responsible
1. Outlet works intake nn-Corps
structure slide gates
2. 16-foot flood control conduit Closed/Corps p
3. Two 48-inch Corps valves Open/Corps
4. Two 60-inch COD valves
Open/Denton
5. Turbine/Generator On/Denton;
6. 36-inch bypass valve Closed/Denton
E. Flood Mode {
During flood mode greater than 1,000 cfs, releases will
be controlled by the Corps. In this mode, the various
parts of the facility identified below will be in the
status indicatedo
Part of Facility Status/Party Responsible !
'
1. Outlet works intake As required by Corps
structure slide gates
2. 16-foot flood control conduit Open by Corps
3. Two 48-inch Corps valves As required by Corps
4. Two 60-Inch COD valves Closed*/Denton
5. Turbine/Generator off/Denton
6. 36-inch bypass valve Closed/Denton
optional-May be left open
r. ~
r
cat
MA:
r
LEWISVILLE REGULATING PLAN
Page 4
F. Transition From Low to Operating Mode
During transition from less than 150 cfs to (150-623)
cfe, the various parts of the facility identified below
will be in the status indicated:
Part of Facility Status/Party Responsible
1. Outlet works intake Remain Open/Corps
structure slide gates
2. 16-foot flood control conduit Remain Closed/Corps
3. Two 48-inch Corps valves Close/Corps
4. Two 60-inch COD valves Open/Denton
5. Turbine/Generator Start/Denton
6. 36-inch bypass valve Remain Closed/Denton ?
k
0. Transition From Operating 0 Low Mode
During transition from (156-623) cfs to below 150 cfs,
the various parts of the facility :dentified below will
be in the status indicatebs
i
Part of Facility Status/Party Responsible
1. Outlet works intake Remain Open/Corps
structure slide gates
2. 16-toot flood control conduit Remain Closed/Corps
3. Two 48-inch Corps valves open/Corps
4. Two 60-inch COD valves Closo*/Denton
5. Turbine/Generator Stop/Denton
6. 36-Inch bypass valve open automatically-
Closed manually/Denton
*Optional - May be left open
r, t
i
as
Ole-
LEWISVILLE REGULATING PLAN
Page 5
H. Transition-from-Operating-to-Operating-and-Spill-Mode
During transition from 623 cfs to 1,000 cfs, the
various parts of the facility identified below will be
in the status indicated:
Part of Facility Statue/Party Responsible
1. Outlet works intake Open /Corps
structure slide gates
2. 16-foot flood control conduit Remain Closed/Corps '
3. Two 48-inch Corps valves Open/Corps
4. Two 60-inch COD valves Remain
5. Turbine Generator Open/Denton
/ On/Denton '
6. 36-inch bypass valve Remain Closed/Denton j
1
1. Transition from operating and Spill to Operating Mode
During transition from 1,1000 cfs to operating mode
(150-623 cfs), the various parts of the facility
identified below will be in the statun indicated:
' pent of Facility Status/Party Responsible
1. Outlet works intake Open/Corps
' r'cructure slide gates
2. 16-foot flood control conduit Remain Closed/Corps
3. Two Winch Carps valves Close/Corps
4. Two 60-inch COD valves Remain open/Denton
5. Turbine/Generator On Denton
6. 36-inch bypass valve Remain closed/Denton
3 1
~ I
y
W v
II a
LEWISVILLE REGULATING PLAN
Page 6
L. Transition from Operating and Spill to Flood Mode
For releases from (623-1,000 cfa) to above 1,000 cfs,
the various parts of the facility identified below will
be in the status indicated:
Part of Facility Status/Party Responsible
1. Outlet works intake As required by Corps
structure slide gates
2. 16-foot flood control conduit Open/Corps
3. Zao 48-inch Corps valves As required by Corps
4. Two 60-inch COD valves Closed*/Uenton
5. Turbine/Generator Stop/Denton
6. 36-inch bypass valve (Open Automatically-
Closed Manua'.ly) /Denton
* Optional-May be left open
M. Transition from Flood to operating and Spill +,I
j For releases from above 1,000 cfs to (623-1000) cfs,
i! the various parts of the facility identified below will
be in the status indicated:
Part of -Facility Status/Party-Responsible
1. Outlet works intake
structure elide gates open/Corps 2. 16-foot flood control conduit Closed/Cors
3. Two 48-inch Corps valves As required by Corps
4. Two 60-Inch COD valves open/Denton
5. Turbine/Generator Start/Denton
6. 36-inch bypass valve Remain Closed/Denton
c
I y
R4
t i
I1 f
l
iY,~,r GS'
l
I
f
f ~
LEWISVILLE REGULATING PLAN
Page 7
II. REGULATING PLAN DURING CONSTRUCTION
A. General
Construction of the Lewisville hydroelectric project is
proposed to begin in July or August of 1990, and shall
take approximately 12 months to complete. During the
first 10 months of construction, lake releases will be
made through the existing discharge structure.
Thereafter, each of the existing outlet conduits will
be out alternatively for two weeks, thus at least one
of the existing conduits will be available for making
releases until the tap to the existing low discharge
5-foot conduit is completed. If necessary, release
requirements greater than the capacity of one conduit
can be made through the 16-foot diameter flood conduit.
B. Construction Release Program
The construction release program -#ill be comprised of
three phases.
Phase I.
No connection to the Corps outlet conduits. During the
construction of the hydra project, the release from the
conservation pool will contnue through the existing
discharge structure.
Phase 11.
Each of the two new 5-foot pipes will be tied to one of
the two existing 5-foot outlet work pipes. Work shall
be scheduled to work on one at a time. During this
period the release shall pass through the other
existing 5-foot outlet pipe.
Phase III`
At time of high water demand during phase 2, the
releases say simultaneously be passed through the flood
conduit and the existing low flow outlet.
t
LLRE021290 f `
1 I
w ~,II
EXCERPT
MINUTES OF PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
August 15, 1990
2. RECEIVE UPDATE ON THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITH THE ARMY
CORPS O£ ENGINEL'R3 -FOR ESTABLISHING OPERATION PROCEDURES FOR
LEWISVILLE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT, FERC NUMBER 3940.
Nelson introduced Joe Cherri, Project Manager, who reviewed
this item and Item i3 concurrently for the Board. Cherri
stated that on February 9, 1990, the City Council approved
both MOA's (Ray Roberts and Lake Lewisville); however, the
Corps advised the city to hold the agreements since they
wished to add comments to it. These comments have been added
and include:
a) Denton agrees to provide the Corps Reservoir
Control Section with daily project data by B-30
i A. M. each day consisting of the 8:90 AM release
rate in cubic feet per second, mean daily turbine,
and bypass release for the period midnight to
midnight. {
b) Denton agrees to notify the Corps Reservoir
Control section within one hour of a unit
R shutdown.
4 c) The Corps shall provide Denton with home phone Y
numbers for use during non-duty hours. IIII
i d) Denton shall regulate water flow through the low 1
flow valves under the instructions of the Corps.
id
After minimal discussion, La Forte made a motion to recommend
to the City Council approval of the minor changes in
Memoranda of Agreement #3939 and 39400 item f2 and item #3
of the Agenda. Second by Frady. All ayes, no nays, motion
r carried.
h ! ~
3. RECEIVE UPDATE ON THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITH THE ARMY
CORPS OF_ ENG_INEERS_FOR ESTABLISHING OPERATION PROCEDURES_ FOR
RAY ROBERTS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT, FERC NUMBER 3439.
See item /2 above.
i
xI7
EXH I 1 .
f
h
6001
t
y
I CITY
COUNCIL 4
t
j(
i
1
v
^i
ti t
O ~ 0 I
b
e
rib t~(~~0
~~GQQ GG6~ U!
I
y
1
E
i
i
Septemb6r 18, 1990
f
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO., MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Consider resolution on the Memorandum of Agreement
(MOA) with the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for
establishing Operation Procedures for Ray Roberts
Hydroelectric Project, FERC Number 3939.
RECOFSKIDATION:
The Public Uti?+..ies Board, at their meeting of August 15,
1990, recommended to the City Council approval of the minor
changes of the subject agreement.
SUP44ARY
On December 5, 1989, Denton's City Council approved this
MOA. On February 9, 1990, the Corps recommended minor
changes to the operation plan and the attached regulating
plan of the executed MOA. Under Article III (Cooperation), s
j subsections 2 and 3, of the operation plan, Denton agrees to
provide the Corps' Reservoir Control Section with daily `
project data by 8:30 a.m. each day. This data shall consist
of the 8:00 a.m. release rate in cubic feet per second, mean
daily turbine and bypass release for the period midnight to
midnight. Denton agrees to notify the Corps' Reservoir
Control Section within one hour of a unit shutdown. The
Corps shall provide Denton with home phone numbers for use
during non-duty hours. Under the regulating plan, the Corps
is requesting that Denton shall regulate water flow through
the low flow valves under the instructions of the Corps.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED ;G
Electric costs for Water and Sewer rate payers, Electric
Utility Department for maintenance and operation.
08160076
P
I
I
i
w /
l
Corps MOA
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT
The total estimated cost of the project is $3,834,000. The
hydro unit will generate approximately 8,400,000 kwh
annually.
r +
Respec ally submitted,
L16 1d . Harrell
City Manager
Prepared by,
r
Cherri, P. E.
'Electric Engineeri '
F
Approved by
r
R. E. Nelson, Executive
Director of Utilities
1 Attachments: 1. Operating Agreement
II. Resolution
III. PUB Minutes
E
.
p
1
08160076
y 1
$55 1
]6 y r
^:idAl
I
Fir
2899r.
r
Y
RESOLUTION NO.
I
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTONo TEXAS, AND THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR HYDROPOWER OPERA-
TION AT LAKE RAY ROBERTS DAM; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES:
SECTION I. The City Manager is authorized to execute an
agreemen-e~Fween the City of Denton and tNe Department of the
Army, Corps of Engineers establishing procedures for hydropower
operation by the City of Denton under the terms and conditions
contained in the agreement attached hereto. !
SECTION II. That Resolution No. 889.076 is repealed.
e
a
SECTION III. That this resolution shall become effective
imme ate y upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ,
1990. j
1
9 I
1
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY,
I
.5
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
E DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY I
f' I
BY: ,
EXHIBIT Now a'
r
~ r
>
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR HYDROPOWER
OPERATION BY THE CITY OF DENTON
~y
PURSUANT TO FEDEYAL ENERGY REGULATORY
COMMISSION LICENSE-
EXISTING DAN FERC PROJECT No. 3939
This Agreement, entered into this day of ,
19 , by and between the DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,-Corps of
Eng veers (hereinafter referred to as the "Corps"), acting by
and through the Southwesten Division Commander, and the City of
Denton, Texas (hereinafter referred to as the "COD"), acting by
and through its City Manager,
WITNESSETH, THAT: j
WHEREAS, the United States is the owner and operator of
Ray Roberts Lake, the associated lands and appurtenant works
located on the M Fork of the Trinity River, a navigable
waterway of the United States in Denton County, Teams) and,
- MmEREAB, COD was issued a license on March 20, 1905 by the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (PERC) to construct,
operate and maintain hydroelectric facility, project number
3939, at Ray Roberts Dan located on the Elm Fork abcve
Denton, Texast and
WHEREAS, The Fort Worth District Corps of Engineers is
responsible for the daily operation and integrity of Ray Roberts
EE Dan; and
WHEREAS, Article 34 of the FERC License requires COD to
enter into Memorandum of Agreement with the Corp2, describing
the mode of hydropower operation acceptable to the Corps; and
EXHIBIT
IJ
N
r
r
RAY ROBERTS OPERATING PLAN
PAGE 2
NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as followsi
ARTICLE -I - RIGHT TO REVIEW AND REVISE
The Corps and COD recognize that this Operating Agreement
is subject to review from time-to-time upon request of
either party as operating experience is gained and
conditions warrant.
I
This Operating Agreement shall remain in effect until
revised by mutual consent.
ARTICLE II - PHYSICAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
-The Hydropower Project, described in the FERC license,
includes one 1,000 kw horizontal-axis hydroelectric
generating unit. An outdoor-type substation is located
near to the powerhouse to step up the generator voltage to
13.2 kv.
The powerhouse is to be located approximately 30 feet west
of the existing stilling basin. A tailrace would extend
about 60 feet downstream from the turbine draft tube to the
discharge channel of the outlet works stilling basin. The
single-unit configuration would entail the connection of a a
60 - inch diameter pipe to the blind flanged bifurcation on
the low-flow outlet conduit constructed by the Corps. A
195 - foot section of the 60 - inch diameter would connect
to the Francis turbine.
ARTICLE-III - COOPERATION
1
1. COD agrees to Operate the Hydropower Project according 1
to the Corps operating requirements. The Hydropower Project
will be operated to protect Federal intereste, including,
but not limited to, the flood control impoundment and
flood release capability of Ray Roberts Dam. The Corps
agrees to cooperate in the operation of the Hydropower
Project, provided such operation is consistent with
Federal interests and with tht Corps' responsibilities for
maintaining the flood control function of the project.
v
d
t
5
1 1
1
RAY ROBERTS OPERATING PLAN
PAGE 3
2. COD agrees to provide the Corps Reservoir Control
Section with daily project data by 0830 hours each day.
This data shall consist of the 0800 hours release rate in
cubic feet per second (CFS), the mean daily turbine and
bypass release for the period midnight to midnight in day
second feet (DSF), and the number of hours of generation
and megawatt hours of generation from midnight to midnight.
3. COD agrees to notify the Corps Reservoir Control
Section within one hour of a unit shutdown. The Corps shall
provide home phone numbers for use during non-duty hours.
ARTICLE IV OPERATIONAL, REQUIREMENTS
SECTION A. GENERAL
COD agrees that Ray Roberts Lake will be operated for
flood control, water conservation, and recreation purposes.
The City of Dallas is permitted to request normal water
supply releases from the conservation pool. That requested
releases are effected through the operation of the control
valve on the 60 - inch flow discharge pipe. At Lake stages
above the top of the conservation pool (elevation 632.50
N.G.V.D.), the Corps takes over all control of Lake
releases. The proposed hydroelectric installation would
generate energy from flows released for the lake
multipurpose operation.
In order to meet the contractual obligations under contract
No. DACK63-80-C-0103 for downstream water supply
requirements of the City of Dallas, the Corps retains
control over the releases from the project. Should the
required releases not be effected through the turbine, the
Corps retains the right to make said releases through the
Corps' low flow outlet works.
a~
SECTION B_ SPECIFIC OPERATIONAL DETAILa
-
1. The Corps is responsible for the operation of
Ray Roberts Dan and Lake. Under this Operating Agreement
and the Texas Water Commission, the Sydro Project shall be
)
y
Mow'
r ~f
i
RAY ROBERTS OPERATING PLAN
PAGE 4
operated as a run-of-river project. The COD shall control
the Corps' low flow regulating valve which is being
supplied by COD. The regulating valve shall be capable of
being operated manually or remotely and the Corps will be
provided with a key to access the valve for emergency
operation should the need arise. Hydroelectric Plant
rv operation shall be fully automatic using a Supervisory
control system for the wicket gates, and turbine/generator.
The remote control system will allow COD to monitor
releases through the powerhouse.
2. After a through review of the application for a
license under part 1 of the Federal Power Act, the design
of the Hydropower Project is consistent with the
engineering standards governing dam safety. An
environmental assessment was issued with a finding of no
significant impact on the environment , and FERC also
concluded `hat the Hydropower Project is properly designed
to compreh-isively develop the hydropower potential of Ray
Roberts D., and Lake, and the Elm Fork River.
3. Attachment 1 " Regulating Plan" summarizes the
operation modes during normal, high, and flood releases.
The method of release will depend upon the elevation of the
Lake; whether the release is for conservation or flood
control; and whether the flow rate is usable for
generation.
4. COD agrees to notify the Corps as sootf as possible
whenever the generating unit to subject to a forced
outage.
5. COD agrees to permit the Corps to take whatever
eaergency action is needed to prevent or reduce a hazard to
huaan life, and to prevent significant fluctuation of
Ray Roberts Reservoir.
6. The Corps has the authority to direct COD to stop
Hyro power Project operation so that maintenance or
repairs may be effected to any part of tht outlet works and
outlet works channel, should such be deemed necessary. The
Corps will provide as much prior notice a3 possible for any {
such outage.
F
f
h
Lt
1
1
r.....
r
RAY ROBERTS OPERATING PLAN
PAGE 5
ARTICLE V - INSPECTION
COD shall permit the Corps to inspect the Hydropower
Project as a part of the Corps' Periodic Inspection and
Continuing Evaluation of Completed Civil Works Structure
Program. Any operational deficiencies or difficulties
detected by the Corps will be immediately reported to COD
and FERC. When operational practices or deficiencies may
result in a situation causing imminent danger to the Corps'
operation, the Corps has the authority to direct COD to
stop Hydropower Project operation and/or take appropriate
action to resolve the problem.
I
ARTICLE VI - COMMONICATION NETWORK
INFORMATION EXCHANGE,
AND REPORTING
COD agrees to maintain communications between the Corps ±
operating personnel by means of a direct circuit or other
direct means of communications, as directed by the
District, to coordinate the operation of Hydropower Project.
ARTICLE VII - MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILTIES
c
1. Responsibilties for maintenance of various facilities
associated with the Hydropower Project will be divided
between COD and the Corps as follows.
"I t
A. COD will aaintain at its sole cost the followings
1. Powerhouse and substation, including the
I fenced area of the site;
it
2. New penstock at all times,
3. The powerhouse discharge channel; J
4. Any signs or public information facilities ll~
constructed by COD for its purposes.
5. All maintenance to the existing Corps Outlet
Works Structure and Conduit, Stilling Basin,
"j
F ~a
W
71
I ~
I
i
S Y
RAY ROHERTS OPERATING PLAN
PAGE 6
and Discharge Channel resulting from
operation of the hydropower facilities.
0. The Corps will maintain at its sole cost the
followings
1. Recreation and public access facilities,
including signs, trails, stairs,
observation/fishing platforms, restrooms and
parking lots, whether original or
constructed by COD as part of the Hydropower
Project; f
2. Any signs or public information facilities
constructed for the Corps' benefit;
3. The normal maintenance of the existing 6eitlet
Works Structure and Conduit, Stilling Basin fi
and Discharge Channel;
2. Nothing in this agreement will preclude COD or the
Corps from contracting with each other to perform specific
maintenance activities, regardless of which agency is
ultimately responsible for the cost.
ARTICLE VIII - OTMM PROVISION
Nothing in this Operating Agreement shall be deemed as a waiver
of any requirement or obligation set forth in the Order Issuing
License issued !larch 208 1985 by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, or any amendments to the license.
UNITED STATES CITY OF DENTON
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
BY: 8Y: ~
Robert C. Lee Lloyd Harrell
Brigadier General, U.S.A. City Manager
Division Engineer City of Denton, Texas
Attachments Regulating Plan
MOAREV
f
y." M
f
REGULATING PLAN
r
FOR
RAY ROBERTS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
This Regulating Plan has been prepared as part of the plans and
specifications for the Ray Roberts Hydroelectric Project in
accordance with Article 34 of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) license for the Ray Roberts Hydroelectric
Project No. 3939 issued March 20, 1985, and extended on April
24, 1986. The plan is divided into two sections:Section I
describes design modes during operation of the Ray Roberts
Hydroelectric Project, and Section II describes reservoir flow
diversion and regulation requirements for operation of Ray
Roberts Lake during construction of the Hydroelectric Project.
1. REGULATING PLAN DURING OPERATIONS
A. GENERAL
c
The Ray Roberts Hydroelectric Project operated and
maintained by COD must be responsive to five
scenarios: releases below minimum turbine flow,
i normal releases, flood releases below 1,000 cfs, flood
releases above 1,000 cfs, and emergency shutdown. The
five scenarios are discussed below. Flow releases
stated are the combined releases through the turbine
and the Corps low flow release pipe and flood release
j conduit as are required.y
i H. Releases Below Minimum Turbine Flow (0-38 cfs)
1. Releases in the 0-38 cfs range.
COMPONENT POSITION RESPONSIBILITY
---p
Low Flow Gates Open Corps
Flood Gates Closed Corps
60" COD Valve Closed COD
T-G Wicket Gates Closed COD
48" Low Flow Opened to COD
Regulating Valve Req'd Floti,
2. Transition from normal releases to releases below
minimum turbine flow.
COD will inform the Corps that COD will be
shutting down the turbine imminently. The COD
will, at that time, open the 48 inch valve to the ,
desired flowrate as instructed by the Corps. COD
will shut the turbine down using normal shutdown
procedures. Once the turbine wicket gates are
closed, the 60 inch COD valve will be closed by
COD. COD will notify the Corps that the shutdown
is complete.
j
T.
r4`" r
t
f
1
7
RAY ROBERTS REGULATING PLAN
PAGE 2
r
3. Transition from releases below minimum turbine
flow to normal releases.
i
i
Turbine wicket gates have remained in the closed
position. COD will open fill valve and fill
penstock if needed. COD will open 60 inch COD
4 valve full open.
COD will proceed to normal turbine-generator
start-up procedures, opening wicket gates to
desired release flow-rate. COD will inform the
Corps that the turbine is passing the desired
flowrate. The COD will regulate the 48 inch low
flow valve as instructed by the Corps.
C. Normal Releases (39-525 cfs)
S
1. Operation in the 39-160 cfs range.
COMPONENT POSITION RESPONSIBILITY
Low Flow Gates Open Corps
-
Flood Gates Closed Corps
60" COD Valve Fully Open COD
T-G Ticket Gates Open to Req'd COD
Flow
48" Low Flow Closed COD
Regulating Valve
2. Operation in the 161-525 cfs range. 1
COMPONENT POSITION RESPONSIBILITY
Low Flow Gates Open Corps
I Flood Gates Closed Corps
60" COD Valve Fully Open COD
T-G Wicket Gates Open to Req'd COD
Flow
48" Low Flow Open to Req'd COD
Regulating Valve Flow
3. The transitions to and from normal releases from
the low flow extremes are discussed in Section B.
4. The transitions to and from normal releases from
flood releases below 1,000 cfs are discussed in
Section D.
J
awl 22 :
t
RAY ROBERTS REGULATING PLAN
PAGE 3
E
D. Flood Releases (525-1,000 cfs)
E
I 1. Operation in the 525-1000 cfs range.
COMPONENT POSITION RESPONSIBILITY
II
Low Flow Gates Open Corps
Flood Gates Open Corps
60" COD Valve Open COD
T-G Wicket Gates Open COD
48" Low Flow Open to Req'd COD s
Regulating Valve Flow
2. Transition from normal releases to flood x
releases, 1000 cfs and below.
The Corps will open their flood gates to release
the desired flow. The 48 inch Carps valve will
remain open. The 60 inch COD valve will remain
open and the turbine will continue to operate.
3. Transition from flood releases, 1,000 cfs and
below, to normal releases.
The Corps will close their flood gates and COD
will regulate the 48 inch flow valve as
instructed by the Corps. The 60 inch COD valve
will remain open.
E. Flood Releases Above 1,000 cfs
1. Operation during flood stage.
COMPONENT POSITION RESPONSIBILITY
Low Flow Gates Open Corps
Flood Gates open 60" COD Valve Closed CODps
T-G Wicket Gates Closed COD
48" Low Flow Open Full Corps
Regulating Valve i
2. Transition from flood releases below 1,000 cfs to
flood releases above 1,000 cfs.
The Corps will inform COD of their intention to
go to flood stage releases above 1,000 cfs, COD
will shut the turbine down using normal shutdown
procedures. Once the turbine wicket gates are
closed, the 60 inch COD valve will be closed by
COD. COD will inform the Corps of their action.
Corps will regulate their flood gates to release
the desired flow.
i
I
11
1 1
f
P.t Yit
F.
7 ~
RAY ROBERTS REGULATING PLAN
PAGE 4
3. Transition from flood releases above 1,000 cfa to
flood releases below 1,000 cfe.
The Corps will inform COD that they are releasing
below 1,000 cfe. COD will crack their 60 inch
valve to fill the penstock. COD will proceed to
normal turbine-generator start-up procedures,
opening the COD 60 inch valve.
" F. Emergency Shutdown
1. Emergency shutdown procedure.
COD will notify the Corps that COD have
experienced an emergency shutdown. COD will
close the 60 inch COD valve. The COD will open t
the 48 inch low flaw regulating valve as
instructed by the Corps.
i
2. The transition from the emergency shutdown to
normal operations will be as detailed in e. 3
above.
II. REGULATING PLAN DURING CONSTRUCTION
A. GENERAL
Construction of the Ray Roberts Hydroelectric Project
is proposed to begin in July or August of 1990, and
take approximately 10 months to complete. The new
valves will be installed in the valve vaults and the
new 60 inch penstock tie-in will be made during the
ninth month.
f
I B. Construction Release Program
5.
Before Penstock Tie-in
- - - -
During about the first 8 months of construction, lake
releases will continue to be made through the existing
outlet works. i
During Penstock Tie-in
The COD will inform the Corps of their intent to
install the new valves and make the penstock tie-in.
The Corps will close their low flow outlet gates.
b P
I~ • ~ I r
1 W rl
a
3
k
1 v
r
. RAY ROBERTS REGUI ATING PLAN
PAGE 5
Valve installation and penstock tie-in will take
approximately two weeks. Required releases will be
made through the 13 foot diameter flood conduit
regulated by the flood gates.
A
fter the Penstock Tie-in and Before Start-up
y~y The COD will inform the Corps that the new valves are
installed. The Corps will take appropriate action to
make flow releases through the existing outlet works.
Turbine Start-up
The actions that will be taken during the transition
from construction releases to turbine start-up will be
the same as detailed in Article B.3 of Section I.
PMDRO
091389
M
i
f
:s
t
1
' r
r
t:
s EXCERPT
.o.
MINUTES OF PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
August 15, 1990
2. RECEIVE UPDATE ON THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITH THE ARMY
CORPS OF ENGINEERS FOR ESTABLISHING OPERATION PROCEDURES FOR
LEWISVILLE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT, FERC NUMBER 3940.
Nelson introduced Joe Cherri, Project Manager, who reviewed
this item and Item #3 concurrently for the Board. Cherri
stated that on February 91 1990, the City Council approved
both MOA's (Ray Roberts and Lake Lewisville) however, the
Corps advised the City to hold the agreements since they
wished to add comments to it. These comments have been added
and include:
a) Denton agrees to provide the Corps Reservoir
Control Section with daily project data by 8:30
A.M. each day consisting of the 8:00 AM release
rate in cubic feet per second, mean daily turbine,
and bypass release for the period midnight to
midnight.
b) Denton agrees to notify the Corps Reservoir
Control Section within one hour of a unit
shutdown.
1 c) The Corps shall provide Denton with home phone
numbers for use during non-duty hours.
j
d) Denton shall regulate water flow through the low
flow valves under the instructions of the Corps.
After minimal discussion, LaForte made a motion to recommend
to the City Council approval of the minor changes in
Memoranda of Agreement #3939 and 3940, item #2 and item #3
of the Agenda. Second by Frady. All ayes, no nays, motion
carried.
3. RECEIVE UPDATE ON THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITH THE ARMY
CORPS 07 ENGINEERS FOR ESTABLISHING OPERATION PROCEDURES FOR
RAY ROBERTS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT, FERC NUMBER 3939.
See item #2 above.
EXHIBIT
Y
I j
I
TM:
d
I
I CITY
COUNCIL
I TTT
C~' a
12
0
° A
~~4D0~7GGDD~
1
Mml
I
FS!
l
t
IVi" t4
4
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
d
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM, Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution for the Traffic Management Grant
j Application and Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
i
SUMMARY:
This resolution authorizes the City Manager to submit
application to the State Department of Highways and Public
Transportation for the Traffic Management Grant Program, and to
execute an agreement for the Faid grant if application is
approved.
BACKGROUND:
t The Traffic Management Program is a State grant program funded
under the Oil Overcharge Restitutionary Act administered by the
State Department of Highways and Public Transportation. Under
this program, medium-sized cities such as Denton may apply for
up to $240,000.00 for traffic management projects. There is a
25 percent local participation that can be met in part or in
full by cash and/ot in-kind services.
I,
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
I Engineering & Transportation Department
Electric Department ;j
FISCAL IMPACT:
Net fiscal impact to the City will be zero in cash if in-kind
services equivalent is sufficient to offset the 25 percent
local participation. i
0773E/31
i
_ .
is
r
q:A),
r
i Cl"OfGENTON,TEX" MUNICIPAL BUILDINO / DENTON, TEXAS 78201 / TELEPHONE(817) 688-8307
j
Office of the Clty Manapei
MEMORANDUM ;
1
t
i
I,
DATE: September 13, 1990
TO. Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harcell, City Manager
SUBJECT: The Traffic Management (TM) Grant Request
j
3 r
The Traffic Management Program Is a State grant program funded under the Oil
~
overcharge Restituttonary Act administered by the State Department of Highways
and Public Transportation tSDHPT). Under this program, medium-sized cities
such as Denton may apply for up to $240,000.00 for individual traffic
management projects. There is a 25 percent local participation that can be
met in part or in full by cash and/or in-kind services. In-kind services
include salary and benefits of City employees working on the project.
The Engineering/Traffic Division 1s applying for a grant under this program
for the following projects:
1) the Eagle Drive arterial signal project;
4w 2) the Oak-Hickory grid signal projectr
r; 3) the Bell Avenue communication line;
' 41 I.H. 359 at Fort Worth Drive turn lanes;
5) Carroll Boulevard 8 U.S. 380 turn lane;
6) Loop 268 ! I-358 traffic operations improvement project, and;
7) emergency vehicle pre-emptors.
I THE EAGLE DRIVE ARTERIAL PROJECTa
i This project will swap tour controllers on Eagle Drive. New state-of-the-art
controllers will replace existing controllers at Avenue C, Avenue A, Welch
Street and Elm Street. Eagle Drive will be synchronized from the Bell
Avenue/Dallas Drive intersection to Avenue C using both time-base coordinators
j and hardwire interconnect to enable hook-up to our closed-looped system.
j
r
' l
11. !
5
Traffic Management Grant Request
pa9" 2
r
pi
§ r THE OAR-HICKORY GRID PROJECT:
j This r oject will change out three controllers on Hickory (at Avenue A, Avenum
B, a.d Welch) and two controllers on Oak (at Jagoe and at Fry).
State-of-the-art equipment will replace existing ones. T1.e project will t
provide for synchronization along Oak, Hickory, and Fry streets. Intersection
modification will be implemented wherever possible.
BELL AVENUE COMMUNICATION LINE: +
This project will install communication wire on Bell Avenue from University,
Drive to Eagle Drive interconnecting all the signals on Bell. This will add
two major benefits to the Bell Avenue signals subsystem, namely:
k
1) enable hook-up to closed-loop system for quick response during down
time, ands f
2) provide hard wire interconnect that would enable traffic respc,nslve
operation.
I-35 @ FORT WORTH DRIVE TURN LANES:
This project will build two turn lanes, one each for the north frontage road
and the so th frontage road. These turn lanes will enable quicker and
smoother transition into the Texas turn-arounds and eliminate long queue a an
the frontage roads that often result from a shared lane situation. The
intersection would be able to operate on reasonably smaller cycle lengths.
CARROLL BOULEVARD I U.S. 380 TURN LANE:
This project builds a right turn lane on the southbound approach of Carroll
Boulevard at its intersection with U.S. 380, There is significant right-turn
volume all day on this leg of the intersection. The existing condition has
right-turning vehicles share a lane with through traffic. This results in the
signal cycle length being extended to its limits especially during peak times,
thereby Increasing total delay and the number of vehicle stops at the
intersection. This project will eliminate this problem.
LOOP 288 @ I.H. 35 E TRAFFIC OPERATIONS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT:
This project will improve the turning radius for the left turning vehicles
from southbound Loop 288 onto I,H. 35E south frontage road. The existing
condition has both two Loop 288 southbound lanes turning left onto the service
road in a narrow throat situation. This results in a very slow turning speed
that diminishes the capacity of the intersection, iccreasing delay and
creating traffic backups that sometimes extend beyond the mall's rain entrance
on Loop 288.
The project will also install additional post mounted and mast-arm mounted
lane control signs on the north and south frontage roads approaches for better
lane control and utilization. Separate signal indications will be installed,
for the right turn lanes on both frontage roads.
C
,
1
{
w
3
Traffic Management Grant Request
page 3 i
I
I t
EMERGENCY VEHICLE PRE-EMPTORS: e
This project will install emergency vehicle pre-emptors that would enable the
city's ambulances and fire trucks to go through some signalized intersections
with no delay and greater degree of safety, Critical intersections will be
selected for this purpose. Intersections that stand out include Carroll 1
Eagle, Avenue C @ Eagle, Malone @ University, Locust and Elm 0 University,
Hickory @ Carroll, and other signals deemed necessary by the Fire Department.
Maps are attached that briefly describe these
i projects. The program does no:
set any limits on the number of projects a city can apply for, but the dolls!
ceiling for individual projects is $260,000, Award notices will be issued by
the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation by December 30,
f 1990, R.~
Respectfully submitteds
L -
loyd V. Harrell
r City Manager
j Prepared bps
Paul Iwuchukwu
Traffic Engineer Associate
Jer y lar , P 5. 7
Dir K-e or o E ineering a Transportation
0885E
r
d ' Ir
^2
I y
i
Ile-
'c
M
h b
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION) AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT APPLICATIONS TO
THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FOR A
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT GRANTS AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Denton recognizes that i.t is in the
interest of the national economy to promote the conservation of
energy resources and to reduce our nation's dependence on costly
foreign oils and
VHEREAS, the tra•tfic management project proposed by the City
of Denton will provide benefits to the local community in the form
of improved traffic flow, reduced fuel consumption, reduced vehicle
operating costa, reduced air pollutant emissions, and improved
safety due to smoother traffic flow; and
WHEREAS, funds have been established and are available through
the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation for
grants to local grvsrnments for traffic management projectst NOW,
THEREFORE, q
f,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES:
,S.EC110N .1• That the Council authorizes the submission of
applications to the State Department of Highways and Public Trans-
portation for a traffic management grant and, if the application is
selected for funding, the City Manager of the City of Denton is
hereby authorized and empowered to ex.cute in the name of the City
of Denton all necessary applications, contracts, and agreements to
implement and carry out the purposes specified in this resolution,
SECTION II. That this resolution shall become effective im-
mediately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1990.
I
BOB CASTLEBERRY$ MAYOR r
ATTESTt
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRET'ARY
i
BY:
,
i~
E
- k
j
r+ APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS
r DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, cITY ATTORNEY
BY.,
traff c res i
c
s
E
a
fJ
3
{
:jl
f
I
1
i
3
Dm
l OOE N
D
r
N
' M At
0 w
E YAN A!
I AVE. i '
ffy
x AVE. A
PONDER
(I~~ C •
WELC FULTON
A
lERNA MOUNT!
m~
OENTON
N IL
lOUTM CARROLL IAM!
m 4
Fi I m n
w
m
1 '
i
i
i
Job]
r I
AV[. C
COLLIL v
n ~ • r
r AVL. ! rCm-~f
Oz
I $ S
4 AVL.
G[MTRAL C J
ic in
N
m wELCN a C
4r r
![ATT S w
r
m
N e[RNA L4
Eloo►I
IC
1111 o
41111111111111111
CLLVLLA
CARROLL BLVD.
I
CL
NVRTLL
[LM
~r
i
F S. LOCUlT
i j
WAINMRI•NT
l ~
~BILL {
M". no
I
090. X ING
TSV.
1
I
• o-XiNO
rev KI~Mi1 K0~
i r J
i
w •
1ARAIRP
' LEGEND
• '~',~af tic. tN9nals i
Co minurtl GOt Ion
P a od
J r 1M s
Line
THO BELL. pwE, PFLOO-OLC.T
i I E
114, W-
~MIAM /
i f
I' 1
1 F~
F 00g.
r
M
US 380
K
r
N
7DD { ~ I
r a
1A,
1`fII N ~ ~ ~
I r ~ ~
n
i
i
h r l
y
t H
I
1V
H
I rl+
1
i
i
r
1
}
-17 7-
~1 Alit^li~ 11
I R*
p~p
i
l
j 1 ~~o-dd $8'Z doo-~ 'ate ca rc ' H -I
1
}
i
N u
opyr -o
P A0 1 f
T s O
`II>
0p0 11a(~'
Na 1 r Q
Q ~ D
i
1
r
i :
I
1!:>v,cazie 8ez J00-1 a 9 S99'H .x
f f
dwr~ 4y0 a I
~t
r a N 1
i
• 4i
fir.., .
i
j i 1'7~,LO'bd @9 Z doo"l ~ 9 5'rc 'H ' I
f ~ O a
gy
I
I 330. S
M
f.46
I
4 ~ fed
- -may
mom
to
.L--p M .CCT1d" QQ z doo-' 3 9Q 'Fi 'I
I
i
a`"e`d 3~0
st-z as
N
J
~ I
o
3
o
L rr
' ulYfi'h: RAJ C~.. : .w.,.,.,
1i
of
r
1
CITY
F
COUNCIL
r
,
,
~a
~orD04p
. 1
i
r
Owl I
~r
1~{
f
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE C1rY OF DENTON, TEXAS DISAPPROVING THE 1991
BUDGET OF THE DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT; AND DECLARING AN
,i EFFECTIVE DATE
~t WHEREAS, the 1991 budget approved by the Denton Central
Appraisal District provides for a significant increase over the
f previous year's budget; and
WHEREAS, this increase, if approved, necessitates a
significant additional contribution from the 1990-91 proposed q
budget of the City of Denton, Texas; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas stands !
committed to adopting a tax rate for the fiscal year 1990-91 lower
F than the 1990 effective tax xate; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY RESOLVES:
SECTION Z. That pursuant to Article 6,06 of the Texas Tax
Code, the 1991 budget adopted by the Denton Central Appraisal
District on September 6, 1990 is disapproved.
3
' SECTION II, That this resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval. t J
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
1990.
t I
t:
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
J
a i J
ATTEST.
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY.
t
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCN, CITY ATTORNEY
i BYt
I
OFF, 7T
,
k
T
CITY
f COUNCIL
9
i
i
MMM 5
i
er o~ {
I.
Cdr
C
000
M, 4
r r e N 1 QQQ
O~QC GY ITf
iff
I
i
C
t CITY of DEHTGN, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING/ DENTON, TEXAS 702011 TELEPHONE (911) 606.9301
Office of to CI Yte Menapar
t
i
t~IEKORAN DUM
TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
' FROM: Rick svehla. Deputy City Manager 3
Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering/Transportation
DATE: September 13, 1990
!I
SUBJECT: Railroad Overpass on Loop 268
1
Since we last met ihesions.thThose subject, we have had
a number of meetingsanddiscus
between DART, Union Pacific Railroad and CI.y staff
staff
Heating Union Pacific right-of-way options 1
1 members concerning resontation by the private railroad
f
pr
j also attended a
1 (Tarantula) which covered methods for short haul freight sing and thou o U
f operations. excursion train staff t ons.pacticipatadtsinnforums
ic Development
the Union Pacific Commerce. More
covering all facets of the issue with the Econom detailed
Committee of the Chamber of
I discussions occurred with representatives from the Chamber
Transportation Committee and railroad enthusiasts at the
` Chamber. We have also had discussio DepaactRentho,ne coDARTnversations
officials
with several members of the Highway One major point has been
R and other tthe pmeetings. The method and vertical
clarified through ough
alignment of the coc ~sa~4 are the teal issue versus abandonment
3 of railroad right f and written
{ Through these discussions. presentations a
ocmation:
correspondence. we have found the following
1. Currently, the Union acific does not use the track
freight OVecatiOfts, and
1 in question for any
~ the staff. as well as the railroad, do not sae any
future operations for the track in the near future.
more than tantyearsthis
Our best available
been used for Information
section has
these facts. the Union pacific aattempt
2. Because
of indicated that they will, in all likelihood,
the r in co er
to abandon ack he r 100 procodures. t This processntakesuaboutuonegyeacp
A
,
. MCI
1
Rallcoad Overpass on Loop 288
September 13, 1990
Page 2
3. If the railroad decides to abandon the track, they
have agreed to advise the City in advance so that we
he
can pursue Pze ails-to TrailsBeprogram horn otherf programsouit tthe
fl R
I'I City desires.
have a plans to eend rail
II not
4 sAR eOeto the City ofyDenton for ttleastDtha next
ervi
20 years.
5. COO's plan does not forecast a need for rail
transportation to the city of Denton for the next 20
years. indeed their recommendations are for HOV
(High Occupancy Vehicle) lanes to be implemented on
the freeway.
i
6. The Chamber of Commerce Economic Development
Committee recommended that the Highway Department's
request be granted. Other groups, including the
Central Business District Committee and the ad hoc
study group, are willing to support at-grade s {
facilitate made to
rail IJ
trlong acks as some
allow crossing the as
activity if it occurs in the future. '
7. The Highway Department would like to abandon the
overpass if there are no rail operations and has
elected to pursue the final answer with the Union
Pacific save sense attached of urgncy ~ as tTherefore, here was sixe
not the weeks I
ago. 1
4 e. An at-grade crossing fcr this same Union Pacific
track is being built in Lewisville on Highway 121.
Given all of the above facts, the staff would propose to delete
the overpass and pursue an at-grade crossing. he mentioned
before, this would solve several safety problems in the mall
area. Given the fact that there is no activity now and none in
I the foreseeable future, we do not think an at-grade crossing
I would prohibit or change any traffic movements in the area.
This solution would allow us to maintain options for the future
should some sort of private entity want to use, the tracks. Our
meetings and discussions with Union Pacific indicate they are
willing to advise us before proceeding with abandonment of the
tracks. It that occucn, we would be abfuture le t louse at ubAarning
the railroad right-of-way
Rails-to-Trails concept or to reserve it for some kind of
private activity. We would suggest recommending to the Highway
Department that they proceed with a design without tho
overpass. The City may need to fund the automatic signals for
the at-grade crossing in the future if some sort of operation
began.
y
a
S
'7 -74
i
v
i
Railroad Overpass on Loop 288
September 13, 1990
Page 3
We think the at-grade option gives the Highway Department the
best solut}.on including an indication for right-of-way
considerations. This method still reserves options for some
kind of future rail transportation if activity ever occurs.
Finally, pedestrian access is still available if that were a
future need of the City since the crossing could be
E ; economically built over or under Loop 288.
Therefore, staff recommends the City advise the State Highway
Department that it has no objections to the removal of the Loop
288 overpass provided the following conditions are met:
1. The current railroad tracks be left in place and an
at-grade crossing be included,
st
2. Should the City require a separated pedestrian/bike
crossing at this location, such will be permitted by {
the State; and
3. Should some type of rail and/or mass transit system
desire to construct a separated crossing at some
time in the future, such would be permitted by the
Highway Department.
If you or the Council have any further questions, please feel
free to call me at your convenience.
R ck vehla r y Cia2sportation
` Deputy City Manager t ctor Engineering
and Tr RBacb
5089
Attachment
i
1 k
I
7
L ~ Y
i
~ F
8 IE~ 1
! I'EV11` L_
SEPlIW
COMMISSION STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ENGINEER DIAECTOR
AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AANOLD W OLIVEA, RE.
ROBERT H. DEDMAN. CHAIRMAN
RAY STOKER, JR, P.O. 30% 1017
WAYNE B. OUDDLESTEN DALLAS, TEXAS 71111400
1 7 14) T180
September 10, 1990
Control: 2250-01-012
Loop 288: 'From U.S. 380 South
EY1' To Near I.H. 35E CONTACT; I
Denton County
I
Mr. Rick Svehla
Deputy City Manager
City of Denton
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Rick:
Reference is made to your latter of Septmeber 6, 1990 concerning the 1
Loop 288 crossing of Union Pacific tracks.
Attached are copies of letters generated by our Department requesting
advice from the Union Pacific Railroad Company about their plans for
this section of their railroad facility. To date we have not received a
response.
I 4
Our Department is in the process of evaluating our current 10-Year
Project Development Plan based on an average $1.4 billion dollar
contract letting volume statewide for the next five years. This letting
volume., is much lower than had been anticipate!, and each District has
been requested to evaluate their Project Development Plan Projects E
authorized for Level III development (planer specifications and estimate t
and right of way acquisition) on the basis of aunuel construction
contract letting volume allocations for the next five years. We are in j
the process of performing this evaluation, and all consultant contract
procedures that have not progressed to the negotiation stage are being i
held in abeyance pending the outcome of this evaluation process which
will of course determine the projects that could be placed under
construction contract within the next five years based on funds that
could be allocated to each District.
I
in summary, District}18 will not need to make a decision about the need
for a highway-raittoad grade separation on Loop 288 until this
evaluation is completed and State Headquarters has reviewed and approved
the proposed project letting plan for implementation. We anticipate
this process will require at least 30 to 60 days. Authority to proceed
with negotiations with a consulting engineering firm could be granted at
that time if the Loop 288 project is selected for inclusion in the
5-Year Letting Plan, and scoping of the work with the consultant should
of course be based on a grade separation if required or without one if
not required.
YYY~~~sss 111AA~~~~ ~E
Ml~ V
1 ~
1
ry{{
1
t
Mr. Rick Svehla
September 10, 1990
Page 2
d
w
i
We would of course at that time need to know the position of the
Railroad Company and the City of Denton if they anticipate usage of the {
trackage for other railway oriented purposes, in the event we are
authorized to proceed further with consultant contract negotiations.
Please advise if we may be of further assistance. ff
Y
Sincerely,
'
doatri a Design Engineer
Attachment
i
i
ti
i ME
I
1 f
r
r MEMORANDUM
TO: File D-5 Date: July 2, 1990
FROM: Mr. John V. Blain, Jr., P.E. Originating Office
District 18
SUBJ?CT: Ccntrolt 2250-01-012 i
Loop 288: From: U.S. 380 south..ard
To: F.B. 35E
Denton District
Lop 288ntoha 4DLans dividedcurbanpfacilitywidan existing
i
As previously discussed in a telephone conversation between
Mr. Allen Stoves and Mr. John Blain; a highway grade f
separation structure is in place on the existing two-lane i
ass
highway, (see attached map) and the railroad tracks which this
underneath the structure are apparently not being used at
time. We would like to know for planning purposes if these
rail lines will become operative in the future and If a grade
separation should be provided for in the proposed reconstruc-
tion of the highway.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact John
Debnar at (214)320-6282.
strict DesignrEnginaer
i
Attachment
{ JVB:jd
copy to: Sturdi_vant, Debner, C-5E
I
:66f,swe gn.
n 1S
commissIoN STATE DEPARTMENT OFHIGHWAYS GN1QcR1RICTOR
AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATIOI OLD W OLIVER. ►r
ROBERT HDEDAN, CHAIRMAN mm RAY STOKER, 1R. DE%ITT C. GREUI STATE IAG"AlSLDG, ro
WA INL S. OUDDLUTf N I ITH A SRATAS
AU Mn%A1 TM1.14)
ISM 4 lmsu
July 9, 1990
COW ACT:
D-5RR
Denton County
CSJ 2250-01-012
Project CRP ( )M
Loop 288: At FXT RR Overpass
DOT No. 414684V
.
i
1
Mr. Larry Lumm I
Mgr, Industry 6 Public Projects
Union Pacific Railroad Company
506 H. Chestnut
Denison, Texas 75020
Dear Sirs
f As planning proceeds for proposed reconstt•uCtian of Loop 288 at the subject
location (see attached sketch), it has been observed that the tracks are
apparently not in use.
Please advise it these rail lines will become operative in the future and if a
i. grade separation structure should be provided.
Your c mtlnuid cooperation is greatly appreciated.
e Sincerely,
Orle'nalSia„+o 6• .u';'i.+lnee
Luis Ybanete P.E.
Bridge Engineer
FFtgb
i Attach.
r ccs Mr. C. Shoemaker j Vat. Cog. Action
beet Dallas District (Dist. 1$)) st. Dist. Engr. Advise
Highway Design Division (b-8) comment t i
Wesley B. Petro P.E. Coast. Engr.
~->asgn. Engr..._ Prep Ans.
Adm. Engr. - Note•rtn. t ;
Maint. Engr.._..._----- See D. E. I ;
R.O.W. Engr.
Transp. Engr. .
I FILE
96IIIIIII~ 7 ~
1
I
e
CITY
IEI=
COUNCIL
{
ffj
tlt
t
k
i
XT:
{
IM:
a ~
TM,
ro H t ~+O~J
~~~QO 6L0
4
.
71 1
i
j
Y
CITY COMCIL REPORT FORMAT
T0, Mayor and Members of the C3.ty Council
` FROM. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT, Agreement with Greater Denton Arts Council for
the Campus Theater I
RECOMMENDATION:
3
` The City Council sub-committee recommends approval.
I{ r ~
SUMMARY,
i
This agreement reflects the result of negotiations between
representatives of the City and the Greater Lenton Arts Council
regarding the old Campus Theater. It outlines the method by which I
the City will pay utility expenses and a portion of maintenance t
expenses. It also states that of the Hotel/Motel T
payment ax for
the GDAC Building Find will terminate March 1 1992. The G C
, DA will
allow the Campus Theater to be used for public use to be specified
in the contract and the City will also receive appropriate
recognition in GDAC publicity.
f
E~CICGROUND s
{ The City Council sub-committee of Jim Alexander and Bob Gorton had
a series of meetings with representatives of the GDAC in August I
1990, and negotiated this agreement. The representatives from both
groups pledged their support of this agreement. None of tits
provisions in the attached Memorandum of Understanding will become
effective until both the City and the GDAC ratify the agreement.
PROGRAMS - DEPARTMENTS OR GR UP3 AFFECTED, I
The Greater Denton Arts Council and its member agencies and the f
citizens of Denton. II
FISCAL IMPACT,
II i
Utility Expenses
An average usage will be determined for each utility and then will
become a maximum amount paid. This usage figure will be determined !
by past and projected future use and will be mutually agreed upon, 16.
This paymrnt would begin October 1, 1991, and a corresponding
amount of maintenance expenses wr*'.d be postponed.
t
a
5
ff1
I
e
CDAC agreement !
page 2
Maintenance Expenses
$5,000/year based on proposed renovation investment
$7,500/year based on $75,000 renovation investment
1% Building Fund
Approximately $50,000 was budgeted for fiscal year 1990-91. This
Hotel/Hotel Tax obligation would end March 1, 1992.
*ESP ULLY SU ITTED,
a
ager
Prepared by:
e.j(..kCJI,
Catherine E. Tuck
Administrative Assistant
roved b s
V
City Manager j
i i
•
.1'
t 1
lS
F
i
1
1 1
• r
'1.. ~ i .iii . •i., w. s.x w•. .J nMl,
y' F
r.
.
J
. F
r
CITY of DENTON / 215 E. McKinney / Denton, Texas 76201
TO: City Council Sub-Committee
Greater Denton Arts Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell
DATE: August 24, 1990 s
SUBJECT: Memorandum of Understanding between the City
of Denton and the Greater Denton Arts Council
This Memorandum of Understanding summarizes the salient points of,
an agreement reached between a City Council sub-committee and the
Greater Denton Arts Council (GDAC) during discussions held from
August 2 to August 23, 1990, to consider the possible acquisition
of the Campus Theater.
This memorandum has been prepared so that similar information can
be shared with the Denton City Council and the GDAC Board of
Directors. it is contemplated that if both parent bodies find the
provisions contained in this memorandum acceptable such will be
refined and incorporated into a formal agreement and will be
considered by both the City Council and the GDAC. None of the
provisions stated below will become effective until the contract
has been ratified but all committee members have agreed to
recommend these provisions to their parent organizations.
1. A separate contract will be prepared governing the Campus
r
Theater with the following provisions for City financial
suppcrt:
14 City payment for electric utilities
will be based on average KW per hour
use based on past use and expected
uset this usage concept would also
apply to gas, water, and wastewater
j}
~F.
ESA
9
utilities Herbert Holl, GDAC
Director, and Lloyd Harrell, City
Manager will work out details of
this arrangement to be inserted in
the formal contract.
2. This methodology establishes a
guaranteed maximum to be paid for
utilities but provides an incentive 1
for energy conservation since any
money saved will revert back to the R
GDAC.
3. These payments will begin October 1,
1991.
B. Maintenance Fxnensas
1. An annual maximum of $5000 will be
paid by the city for legitimate
{
maintenance expenses.
2. city checkoff prior to performance
i
of asintenance items is required
before the City can approve payment.
i
3. If GDAC invests a minimum of $75,000
of life cycle energy efficient
improvements (eq. new roof, now
HVAC), the city will raise the
annual maintenance maximum to $7500.
41 GDAC has three years to raise the
i
I
~W.r,PC 4 hn1- LY:-i.r.., r 1I n::..l 1 .
i ~ Yf9HS~ ;
II`
~ a
additional $75,000 and
perform the
additional improvements. The
maintenance level would be increased
only after the improvements have
been completed.
5. Maintenance expenses, as outlined
I
above, will be assumed by the City
t
as of March 1, 1992, however,
payment for these expenses will be
modified as follower
' t
Any utility payments made for the
Campus Theater by the City between
October 1, 1991, and March 1, 19928
will be credited against the yearly
maintenance payments. For example,
if $10,000 worth of utility payments
are made during this periodr the
'
City would not start making
maintenance payments until March 10
1994 (assuming a $5,000 per year
maintenance limit). I
6. Janitorial expenses will not be paid
by the City of Denton.
G
r II. GDAC will retain title to the Campus Theater.
III. One percent of the Hotel/Motel Tax for the GDAC Building
I i
i
I
I
I
"U,1
'g
Fund will terminate.
A. This payment to GDAC will cease on March 1,
3.992, in accordance with the current agreement
i governing the allocation of Hotel/Motel funds.
The proceeds from this one percent charge will
assist the city in covering the r-?enses
associated with the Campus Theater.
IV, GDAC will give the City a !
ppropriate recognition on GDAC
publicity.
V. The contract will provide for appropriate public use of
the Campus Theater in order to justify public financial .r
' support. Examples of such use could be free use of the
theater for so many Main Street Events, several free
Children's Theater workshops, etc. The exact nature of
~ j d I
these commitments will be negotiated and inserted in the
formal contract,
` VI. The agreement will be for , twenty-live year period, but
must contain a yearly appropriation clause as is required ~I
in all multi-year City contracts.
VII. Other standard contractual obligations previously found
In the existing contract between GDAC and the City will
be incorporated in the now agreement.
r
% I
1 ~
FFJ 'i
f
RCITT
COUNCIL
I
j
~aM a~
4 b~
0
4
E
M 4
t~OpO
0 0 At.
G V"
I
I
I
1
I
i
1
i
Ia
1
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
~I
x DATES September 14, 1990
T0: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
FROMt Jesus Nava, Jr., Assistant to the City Manager
SUBJECTt Status of Boards and Commissions Orientation Tcess
I just wanted to let you how Debra and I are doing in regards to the
orientation of City Board and Commission members. The following Boards
and Commissions have received their orientation:
i
Airport Bo,erd
Parke and Recreation Board ,
Planning and Zoning Commission
The following have been scheduled (as per the dates givens
a
Building Code Board, Sept. 20, 1990, 4100 pm, Planning Conference Rm.
Citizens Traffic Safety, Oct. 1, 19901 5:30 pm, Council Chambers
Civil Service Commission, Sept. 19, 1990, 2s30 pm, Council Chambers
Historic Landmark Commission, Sept. 24, 1990, 5:00 pm, Civil Defense
Library Board Sept. 27, 19900 7s30 pm, Library Conference Rm. i
Public Utilities Board, Sept. 20, 1990, 6:30 pm, Service Ctr. Training
In regards to the remaining boards and commission, I am working with I
the staff liaisons to schedule special meetings specifically for the
orientation. Instead of calling individual meetings for each group, we
are trying to coordinate one session with all the remaining members.
Board of Adjustment r
Cable TV Advisory Board
Community Development Block Grant Committee
Data Processing Advisory J
Electrical Code Board
Human Service Committee
Plumbing and Mechanical Code Board !
Note that the majority of the board and commission members have been ~
sworn-in and have completed their "Affirmation of Qualifications and
Statement of Financial and Personal Interest". Only ten of the
j appointees remain to be sworn-in and complete their statements.
Please let me know if you would like additional information regarding
this process.
cot Debra A. Drayovitch, City Attorney
Jennifer Walter, City Secretary
{I
« I
i'
fJ:i N P~
r
I r:
i
I
i
i
E
I
1
a, .
Fl LE
!
I
I