HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990 - 1991
ro
r,5
GQ
_t
'Y
!
F~S1~T1~TS 'n~
f
410 r
19
f
'i
Flt f
! ! 57 as ' :t ` ` f
! r ! er
t ~ i LV it ~ Sr ' / t t ~ t 1 i ft it -
t i 'rt f , 112 1 t51 ~'r tt ~ 1 ~ rtV t } t
t ~ Y I rl~ ~t(+ rs~ I~fFj~q. 4E 1-, 0. t, L A v 1 sci a ti sd
rt i,1 1Y r tie , t,d Y # t4 ei.',f ?,L1i t+>}i Si`+S 1 ,~S ct'~ ~Y r ~f sd
~~ay~ th
P~` . i{.c s.~. ~>~s~ih,~t ~•~+5 t 1 ,r° Ss~~S SSti'~XF~4s t, t ~
LAI
WrY o(DBNroNr TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TBLEPNONE (817) 566.8200
July 17, 1991
Dear r
Get me take this opportunity to thank you for the leadership you
provide in the community, it is citizens like you that help make
Denton a great place to live,
Becaune of your interest and involvement in Denton, T would liko
c:o share with you some information recently provided to the City
Council which compares Denton with six other Texas cities, r
believe thisr information will be of interest to you ae_ well as
being timely since the City Council has begun its annual budget
discussions,
The City of Denton is frequently compared with other Texas
cities, Sonia of these comparisons only consider tax rate and
total number of employees, This simplistic comparison does not
provide a clear picture since the City of Denton provided all
utility servioas plus a wide spectrum of additional services
which are not provided by most municipalities, Also, those
comparisons do not consider the large amount of tax exempt
property which is located within our community,
To obtain a more accurate picture, the study brings the
comparison down to services that each City provides such as
police and fire protection, street maintenance, and park
servicos, As you will sea by the results of this report,
• Denton'a efficiency in providing City services compares very
favorably with the six other cities surveyed.
• • •
Jill,
ty
14,
t
.
w
Leadership
" July 17, 1991
gaga 2
T hope that this report provides you with useful information
about our operations, If you have any questions, please feel
free to contact me. Again, thank you for your active service and
leadership in our community,
Lloyd V. Harrell
City Manager
wp
Enclosure
3543k/3544k
- I ♦ w r Y.~M u:ILJiL' A'w ,Y-r,,. I { ` i,r
j'i
i
I
J
clr r of offwoN, ru' XAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DWON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
DATE, May 310 1991
TO, Lloyd Y, Harrell, City Manager
PRO141 Catherine Tuck, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT; CITY COMPARISON PROJECT
Denton is frequently compared to other cities such as Carrollton, Richardson,
and Lewisville, Therefore, the objective of this study is to look at staffing
levels, services, and cost of services provided by cities comparable in size
to Denton, Tho cities included in the study are Bryan, College Station,
Carrollton, Denton, Lewisville, Richardson, and T ter.
cities were chosen. Tyler was chosen as -a similar, stand alone community
Bryan and College Station are similar university communities,
the study is to present the findings and offer some reasonable coThe Iten
nclusions to
show why ihero are, if any, 'significant differences in the staffing levels and
the cast associated in providing these services,
In order to obtain the information presented, current buagets were reviewed
and conversations were held with city finance, ersonnel, utili
public safety, parks and recreation managers, p of street,
city managers' offices, It is very difficult to comparemciitieson a the
range and level of services vary greatly, citiesare organized differently,
and information is recorded differon ly. Every effort was made to analyze
comparable services and numbers, however, score discrepencfes may still exist,
The study is structured by first presenting general information concerning
population, area, assessed value and tax rates, The study also ranks each of
the cities in several areas of service,
As shown in Table 1, Denton, with a population of 66,270 ranks fourth; in
Table 2, Denton, with an area of approximately 64 square smiles ranks first,
B
t 1 ~ ~
I, t i 74 , 1i Ar M1
.1
I ,
Lloyd V, Harrell
May 31, 1991
Page 2
TABLE 1
POPULATION
1990 CENSUS
Cities Compared Polpulation
Carrollton 82,159
Tyy1 er 75, 46o
Richardson 740840
Denton 66,270
orgyan 56,002
College Station 62,456
Lewisville 46,521
TABLE 2
SQUARE MILES
No, of Citizens
Square miles Per Square Mile
Den ton 6411 11226
Tyler 40,6 1`867
Carrollton 600 2;348
Bryan 1,724
Lewisville 31.2 1,113
College Station 27,7 1,894
Richardson 2712 21761
When looking at total assessed value, Denton's property is assessed at
approximately two billion dollars, As indicated in fable 3, Denton ranks
fourth in taxable value although it is by far the largest in land area,
Lewisville has approximately the same assessed value as Denton, but its land
area is over twenty square miles less than Denton, When comparing Denton to
Carrollton, we find that Carrollton's assessed value is over twice that of
Denton, but Denton has approximately 19 more square miles, Denton also has a
large amount of tax-exempt properties with County offices, two universities,
and other federal and state tax-exempt property,
I r
I
sf '
7
i
I
'Lloyd V, Harrell 31 Page 30 1991
TABLE 3
TOTAL ASSESSED VALUE
1990-91
Assessed Value
Richardson $ 6,014,032,428
Carrel l ton 4,691;4600671
Tyler 2,628,262,266
Denton 2,036,603,286
Lewisville 1,998,806,600
Bryan 1,287,268,629
College Station 1,101,479,6'22
Table 4 shows Denton having the highest tax rate as compared to the other
cities. However, when considerin the amount of tax-exempt
g
property in
Denton as compared to the amount of taxable property in Richardson and
Carrollton, these two cities have over twice the amount of taxable property
than Denton. Denton 's tax rate has to be a higher rate than these cities to
generate the same amount of revenue,
TABLE 4
TAX HATES
7990-97 I
Tax Rate E
Denton .6661 l
Dryan .6681
Carroll ton
Lewisville ;5311
Tyl erg 4833
College Station ,QUO
Richardson ,3928
To illustrate this, Table 5 shows the amount of revenue generated by Denton's
s tax rate based es the other cities' assessed values,
...«....«1. «.«..e.,w'...,....:..:.~.. u. ..w.. -_7a w`c Po;:,a { fr r(y
~ 1 1 1 I ~ +
I
t
0
to
a
x
C
Lloyd V. Harrell k
May 31, 1991
Page 4
TABLE 5
Oenton's Revenue
Assessed Value Tax Rate Generated
Richardson $ 6,014,032,428 0,61161 $ 31,861,619
Carrollton 4,691,460,671 0,6661 29,611,746
Tyler 21520,2621266 0,6661 16,014,931
Denton 21036,603,285 0,6661 12,941,634
Lewisville 1,998,806,6DO 0,6651 721701,367
Bryyan 1,287,268,629 0,6661 811790846
Cc logo Station 101011479,622 0,6561 60999,314
Another revenue source, sales tax, shows Denton to be behind all but one city
for Mis year,
TABLE 6
SALES TAX
JANUARY 1 - MAY 10, 1991
YEAR-TO-DATE. ACTUALS
Richardson $ 6,33y 692
Tyler 4,237,001
Carrel l ton 3, 7l l , 496
College station 21785,771
Lewisville 2,316,605
Denton 2,296,002
Bryan 21116,688
As Indicated in Table 7, Denton has the highest number of full-time emplo ees
with 903, Havovor, when looking at Vie number of employees in General runs
only, Denton's number of full-time employyees dropps significantly by
approximately 363 to brim? Denton, total to 5404 As indicatod in Table 61
Denton now ranks fourth in the numbur of full-time employees. Phis is an
important distinction because, frequently, when Denton is being compared to
other cities, the total number of full-time employees is used, This is a
misleading figure, Denton owns its own electric, water, and wastewater
facilities, and provides sanitation and landfill services, No other city
p
cum pared performs all of these services in-house, The maJority of the 363
employees are located in utilities. Nowever, even using general fund numbers
is somewhat misleading since Denton tends to perform a more comprehensive
range of services than other cities.
Another important factor that affects general fund staffing is the large 0 n
amount of general fund support necessary 'because Denton owns its own
utilities, This increase in personnel occurs in several administrative areas
associated with utility Services. Examples of this increased staffing are in
areas such as Customor Service, Data Processing and Accounting,
w`
A
o ,
1
Lloyd V, Harrell
May
310 Page 6
TABLE 7
TOTAL FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES
Total Full-Time Employee Ratio
Em to oes Per 1,00U
Denton 903 13.6
Tyler 870 11.6
Carrollton 855 10,4
Richardson 860
11.4
Uryyan 726 13,2
College Station 642 1013
Lewisville 424 941
TABLE 8
GENERAL FUND FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES
Total Full-Time Emp'ioyee Ratio
Em loyees Per
General Fund Ong 11000 Citizens
Carrollton 705 8,6
Richardson 676 9.0
Tyler 578 7,7
Denton 640 812
Bryan 397 7,2
College Station 368 6,8
Lewisville 331 7,1
Table 9 shows the amount of general fund money spent per capita. Nowover, If
the sanitation and electric support costs are taken out, than the total
general fund amounts to $261404,313 and 383,35 per capita. This is in line
with these other cities and does not account for water and wastewater support
costs in the general fund,
TABLE 9
GENERAL FUND
General Fund Per Ca. pi to
Richardson $ 41,787,970 S 668,36
® Carrollton 38,169,638 453;49
Denton 27, 412, 408 413,66
Tyler 25,705,720 340,70
Lewisville 16,486,769 353,79
College Station 15,747,663 300421
Bryan 14,625,091 266,90
I~
' r I - M NY.raVw~.,i::iil l: u ✓fe 1 1
F
'Lloyd V. Harrell
May 31, 1991
Paye G
To take a closer look at general fund operations, several departmen, have
been compared, In the area of Police, Denton ranks fourth in the total number
of sworn police officers and 'sixth in the number of sworn officers per square
mile. Also shown in the table, Denton ranks fourth in total departmental
budget and fifth in dollars spent per capita, In considering Do number of
square miles the officers serve, Denton ranks low in the area of public
safety, Only Lewisville ranks tower than Denton in the number of sworn
officers per square mile,
TABLE 10
POLICE PERSONNEL
Sworn Total Budget
Officers 1990-91
Richardson 139 $ 10,376 401
Tyler 131 7,106,293
Carrollton 128 8,434,569
Denton 109 6,768,612
Bryan 84 4,460,376
Lewisville 74 4,683,308
College Station 67 317690643
Monoy Spent
Perri is
Richardson $138,66
Carrollton 102,66
Lewisville 98,52
Tyler 94.17
Denton 87,02
Br an 80,91
College Slatien 71,88
No, of Officers
Per square Mile
0 Richardson 6111
Carrollton 3466
Tyler 3,23
Bryan 2,63
College Station 2,42
Denton 2,01
Lewisville 1,77 •
+
r
C~
a
,
Blom
Ehm
'Lloyd V. Harrell
May 31, 1991
Page 7
In fire service, Denton ranks sixth in the number of firefighters and EMS
personnel and last in the number of firefighters and EMS personnel per square
mile,' Also indicated in the table, Denton ranks fourth in total deppartmental
budget and dollars spent per capita. Again, Denton appears to rank low in the
area of public safety,
With the second lowest number of personnel per square mile, Denton is serving
the largest Area, It is also Important to note that Denton services two
universities with a combined' enrollment of approximately 37,000 and receives
the highest number of EMS calls, Denton also serves a large portion of the
county which brings the 'total service area to over 300 square miles and a
daytime service population of between 100-1250000,
TABLE 11
FIRE PERSONNEL
Sworn Fire EMS Budget Per
Officers Calls EMS Calls 1990-91 Capita
Tyler 116 2,299 No 0 S 4,960,636 S 66,76
Richardson 90 421 36 3,086 6,872,026 90.62
Carrollton 86 11631 28 30210 614OU1493 77,89
College Station 86 11300 31 1,706 2,96x,404 66,67
Bryon 72 2,080 24 3,768 302940154 59,89
Denton 69 16108 1s 3,682 4,943,626 74,60
Lewisville 61 867 * 2,360 3,x53,980 74,26
*EMT's included in sworn officers.
No, of FF/EM5
Per Square Miie
Richardson x.63
College Station 4.19
Carrollton 3,31
Bryan 3,01
Ty1 er 2183
• Lewisville 1,96
Denton 1.66
m-werae~n~rnwnsw~~.,e.u, ~ MAY /Y MMLK 1fYNW1.'r l':'✓"W`I 1
1 1 1
• .J• 1 .i i~,~ ,f. F `t~,t 1HV~: Y~~' {,l;•i ith1443•
r ,
a
i
Lloyd V. Harrell
May 31, 1991
Page 8
In the area of park maintenance, Denton ranks fourth in the number of
developed acros'of park acreage and ranks fifth in the number of full-time
employees dedicated to maintaining those acres as estimated by the park
managors, Employees are utilized where needed and do not necessarily work
exclusively on maintenance of those acres,
TABLE 12
PARKS
No. of Employees
Dev. Acres employees Per 10000
Tyler 900 26 133
Richardson 100 64 ,86
Carrollton 60U 67 ,82
Denton 642 23 ,36
Dr an 362 19 ,36
College Station 308 16 .30
Lewisville 168 4 ,09
Utilities appears to have Die greatest effect on how the cities compare. As
indicated in fable 13 Denton and Bryan are the only cities compared that own
and operate their electric, water, and wastewater services, Denton also
operates a landfill which Bryan does not,
TABLE 13
UTILITIES
City-Owned City-Owned City-Owned
Electric Water Was tewa tort
Bryan Yes Yes Yes
Carrollton No No No
College Station Yes* Yes Yes
Denton Yes Yes Yes
• Lewisville No Yes Yes
Richardson No No No
Tyler No Yes Yes
* Electric Distribution Only
When comparing tho number of full-time employees for street repair, we had to
take into considoration that the number of employees indicated for maintenance
does not reflect an exact number of eft oyM that work strictly on street
repair and maintenance, Employees are allso utilized in those areas where they
are needed most, Denton ranks fourth in the numbe of lanes miles of streets
r? r .
I' t,. t ! I I I
V 't I 1~ ae+~i t, 4t7~~1 „S+;7i
r:
to
'Lloyd V, Harrell
May 31, 1991
page 9
maintained, and fifth in the number of employees dedicated to existing street
repair and maintenance. The dollars dedicated to number of lane miles
maintained is significant. For example, Denton maintains over IUO more lane
miles than College Station with much loss money and less employees,
i
TABLE 14
STREET MAINTENAIXE # of of
N of N of $ for Traffic N of Street i
Lane Full Time Mainrials & Control street Sweeper
Miles Employees Maintenance Employees Sweepers Employee
Tylor 498 38 12 4 G
Carrollton 346 40 8241337* 16 2 1
Richardson 334 4j 3870306 6 6
Denton 330 21 360,000 6 1 1
Bryan 270 20 2 2
College Station 200 22 6y1,662 7 1 1
Lewisville 16U 11 240,000 3 1 1
* Includes le of tax rate dedicated to street maintenance,
Information not available,
In the area of Animal Control, Denton's staffing level ranks lowest in cities
that provide both enforcement and shelter sorvicet, Several cities contract
with the county office and do not provide that service, The table below also
illustrates the large number of calls Denton responds to monthly, second only
to Carrollton, with one of the 'smallest slaffs and budgeted monies,
TABLE 16
ANIMAL CONTROL
# of Monthly
Officers Hu_ dget Calls
Richardson lU $ 410,000 6OU
Carrollton 8 4OU1000 11OOU
Lewisville 7 260,000 610
Denton 6,6 244,063 731
* Tyler 6 102,544 480
* Oryyan 4 276,OUO Wo
• * College Station 2 220000u 220 • •
* No shelter
..r
,
`J
a h~`{ ..tip < iii y'J
p
41. 4
J,
r .
t
♦4 !
L 11
Lloyd V. Harrell
May 31 1991
Page 16
i
Although it is difficult to compare cities accurately, this study has
attempted to make fair compparisons, Several canctusions Can be made from the
results of this study, First, that Denton is greatly affected by the large
amount of tax-exempt property in the city, 7w0 motor universities as wail as
county and federal offices greatly reduce properly tax revenues, Yho two
universities add a greatamount to Denton in cultural activities and
educational opportunities, and are a strong employment base, However, it is
important to realize that the drawback is that the city loses property tax
revenue, Denton is by far the greatest in square miles, yet ranks fifth in
total ?assessed Value, 'this forces the City to raise its tax rate to got the
same amount of revenue, Cities that have a`larger assessed value can generate
an equal amount of revenue wi th a lower tax rate,
Secondly, because Denton owns and oporates all its utilities, this 'skews the
number of employees when making comparisons, When the number of general fund
employees is oonparea in all seven cities, Denton ranks in the middle, When
looking at sped fic departments, Denton ranks low in staffing levels, `This is
particularly true of police and fire where Denton ranks below the middle in
several categories,
Denton provides as many or more services than any city studied in this
comparis'on. Denton is the only city compared that owns and operates all its
utilities including residential and commercial solid waste and a municipal
landfill. Denton provides residents with. a municipal airport, throe
recrea¢tion centers, a senior center, literacy and enea1o rograms, aft?r
school programs for children,, and historic p ~ -d v reserva ion engyeapors,
Denton s
unique programs include Community Wonted Policingg, Main Street, keep Denton
Beautiful, recycling efforts, and works closely with netghborhood groups. the
City also helps fund handicapped and elderly transportation and a public
trolley systen, and many social service agencies, Denton also administers
ON funds,
Given the shrinking property tax base and largo amount of tax-exempt property,
it will be an increasingly difficult challenge to maintain the same high level
of services and keep the tax rate low,
Ma er nA uc
M wp
2D15e
.».+.M:«...-..W... r q: , e i rat }
v" A
1=t 7, y, ,t r J m L-
• 0
'~i , ''J `FI ,y j"1<< ~irr } f F~ RlY9~rY I(I J?.ti~~ > 11i: j:
.
i
i
Lloyd Y, Herren`
May 31, 1991
Page it
TABLE 11
SLWARY '
College ?
8. ryan Carrollton Station Ik0 t4n Lewtavllle Rtcherdson T_ yllr
Population 660002 62,411 611477 660270
0,621 74,840 740279
Area . Square Miles 31.9 3610 2717 01.96 41.81 2).2
40.62
Current tax Rate ,6681 16640 4000 ,6183 16321
.3098 ,4833
Total Assessed Value 1,287,26&,629 4,661,9060613 1001,479,522
1,981,132,926 1,996,806,600 b,Ui4,032,428 2,620,169,379
Full-time tmployeos 726 886 642 098
424 870. 896
Ponce J
A. No, of Sworn officers 84 128 67 16y
No, of Calls Received 601638 61033D 74 139 131
C. total Budgat 4 400 316 8,434969 301362 30,000 3,7691643 34,484 46,733 60,806
8,766,612 ,376,401 9 105
D. Per Capita 80.91 102,36 .72,62 87,02 4,683,308 10
E, Does Service Area Extend No NO No 98.62 138,66 96.66293
Fire Yea Yes Yes Ye6
~
A, No, of Fire righters 72 31 62 64
8. No. of EMS 24 15 63 126
C, No, of Cells Received 01641 4,472 3,292 4163Q 30+ x118 1
1. Fire 2,219 11631 1 6,687 36769 2,299
,414 10200 31227 3
2. EMS . Other 31266 21113 10878 30430 2,360 3084 472
668 , 160 2
• 0, Total 5udgat 31294,194 61400,493 2,967,404 6,016,013 3 224 272 11647
E, Per Capita 69.89 77.66 67,09 16,69 ' 4,8610381 4,960,636
F, Does ServlCe Area Extend Yes Yes Yes 69,31 64.96 66.78
Yes Yes Yes Yes
201be
•
~:t. .u •,s ,r... ni..v.a.-.. i+3+F t!,~4fu.i ly'Vy#z''~.
Lloyd V. Narroll e
Nay 31. 1991 :i
Pago 12;
h ,
TABLE 12 >
S6Mg1ARY
Icontinuea)
c
College
Arm Carrollton Station Denton Lewisville Richardson Tyler
streets
A, No, of Lane Miles 2691% 768 200 300 160 334 498
a. No.. of Employees 20 40 22 21 11 46 38
C, Budget
(materials/Maintenance) + 317,986 6420000 240,000 387,306
0, Not of Traffic Control
Employees + 7
E, No, of Street Sweepers a 2 1 1 1' 6 19
6
Parks d Recreation
A, Roo of Dovelopou Acres 362 600 308 642 166 700 960
B No. of Employees 19 67 b3 23 4 64 26
otilitios
A, City Owned
1, Electric Yes No No Yes No No No
4>i 21 Water vv> No Vol Yes Yes No Yes
3, NesWetor Yes NO Vol Yes Yes No Yes
+ Figures unavailable,
O
2016e
ra
,
I
v ..i. rir.eJ naf"Y•{. J♦ ..l Y.t li.ilrM YA.:. f1 fv. l.YR.Vfe. 1 ~g 1lTrA R~~r
iK1.fNlvB.• ♦YL. 'fn9:+/; tYl r N}~M:fft-zt `SI`,4"hI%'4! 'In i\~f~R I`
Lloyd V. Ilarrell
Ny 31,1091
Page 13 i,
f,
SUMMARY Of MISCELLANEOUS
h~
1College 't9
Bryan Carrollton Station Denton Lewisville ktchardson Tyter 1`.
Universities/Colleges Yes No Yes yes No Yes `
Yes
City Maintained Airport Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes
Lake F'ac111ttes Yes No No No Yes Yes
Yes
City MalntelAed CeMetery Yes No Vol Yes No NO Yes t,
Downtown Oevelopwt yes yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes
City Maintained Golf Course Yes Yes No No k
No Yes No
Citizen Newsletter No Yea Yes No No Yes yet
t
F
M
20160
c.~
i
r
y
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
_ , V O 110Y.99010 IIUI TtiXA5 AVt.NW!
C01 HAW STAiturt, rr:xAS 194?0010)
(409) 764 AW0
March 8, 1991
Ms, I.orl F'ridel, intern
City of Denton
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Ms. E'ridel;
This is the report I mentioned to you In our discussion on the phone This report was
a part of a larger report and was written to address Issues concerning the growth of
municipal property maintained by the Parks Operations Division of the Collego Station
Parks and Recrcatlon Department, It compares the Increase of parks and other
municipal property with the. Increase of Parks Operations personnel that maintains the
properly,
rror the past four or five years, we have not been ahie to Increase our staff or the
budget to accommodate Iho rIncrease In parks, additions to present parks, and Inherited
municipal properties, Th1s eport was written in 1989 and stands true even more so
today, I am sure there arc many cities facing this same situation,
As you can (ell by (he report, Forestry is its own division, I do nott know if the work
you are doing concerns forestry or horticulture work but 1 wl11 give you some
information on our Forestry Division f usl in case, The poreslry Division also consists
of a three man cemetery crew, but I will exclude the cemetery porllon of the division
The forestry part of the division consists of a crew of five Including the Forestry
Superintendent, that Is responsible for both forestry and horticulture work 'T'hey arc
responsible for tree and shrub care on all municipal proper[ ; Including pruning,
removal, planting, fertilizing, landscaping care, and watering. The Forestry ivislon
also hunt] a the Arboretum matutenance and mosquito control/ 'rheymaintain 67,271
square feel of (lower beds and 23 Irrigation systems,
Actual forestry type work consists of the following;
-Mow and trim the Arboretum every two wccks from Spring Io Fall,
Clean and Inspect the Arboretum trails weekly,
Remove all dond and diseased Irces,
Perform till street Irec work as rsted b the city (raffle engineer,
-Respond to citizen questions Al nd complaints concerning the cure and condition of
trti.es, and breeding sit for mosquitos.
0 -Plant and care for Irecs and shrubs on all municipal properties.
Plant flowers in annual beds twice a year,
-irrigation repair,
Although there is very little: work overlap between the Park Operations and Forestry
Divislons, we do help each other on sppecial projects or when the need arlses, I hope
Ihis Information is helpful to you and it you wish for further. information plcaan call me
at (4099) 764.34111
Sincerely, 0
r
Curtis Ilinghnnt
Parks 0 eralions Superintendent
College Mallon Parks and Recreation
berme of 'icxas A 6 ht Onlvcrsity
N
i
COLLEGE STATION PARKS AND RECREATION
ISSUL Its FACILITY GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
The purpose of this report is to show the increase of
maintenance needs and the lack of staff to properly meet
thOso needs, It also presents possible solutions to the
problem,
Five employees were added to the Division 83 staff in
1983 and six more in 1985. Between 1983 and 1984, 8 parks,
City Hall and Fire station #1 wore added to the areas which
are maintained by Division 83.
These inalude the followings
120.03 Acres 72t increase
6 Ballfields 75% increase
13 soccorfields 1621 increase
6 Basketball courts 2001 increase
1 Jogging Track 33.3$ inarease
1 2xoraise court 100% increase
8 Playgrounds 80% increase
1 pavilion 33.3% increase
6 Buildings loot increase
14 Pionic units 56% increase
4 Tennis Courts 44.43 increase
2 Ponds 66.73 Increase
4 Nature Trails 2003 increase
11 Baseball Backstops 220% increase
5 Picnic Shelters 2603 inarease
703 Irrigation Heads 231% Increase
In 1986, two budgeted positions of Division 83 were
i transferred to the Forestry Division, This action was taken
to provide two horticultural peraonnel for- the City,
Between 1985 and the end of 1989, 7 parks (Emerald Forest,
Sandstone, and Westchester Park will be completed before the
end of 1989)/ The Train Station, Fire Station rye, Water
Tower, Landfill Entrance, lot of Mayor Anderson's home, a
i rental house lot, and the Community Development were added, r i
Those include the followings
5
i ~ ,
s'
P
560.84 Acres
4 Soceorrields
4 Basketball courts
4 '7099ing Tracks
2 Exorcise Stations
7 Playgrounds
1 Building i
7 Picnic Units
1 Nature Trail
6 Baseball Backstops
6 Picnic Shelters
455 rrrigation Sprinklers
The following shows the total percent increase since
1982,
IM g 9 .~.~1.C-
* AcY~ie
Baseball Fields 167,75 387.37 130,9t
Soccer Fields 8 14 78,0$
Basketball Courts 6 2` 283.3$
logging Tracks 3 13 333.3$
Exercise courts 3 8 16647%
Playgrounds 1 4 300,0$
Pavilions 10 25 150.0$
Buildings 3 4 33.3$
Picnic Units 6 13 116,7$
Tennis Courts 25 46 84.0%
Ponds 9 13 3 44.4$
Nature Trails 5 66,7$
Baseball Backstops 2 25010$
P Picnic shelters 5 22 340.0$
Irrigation Sprinklers 304 13 550,0&
bivislon 83 Staff 24 380.98•
14 23 3 64.3$
* Only about 55
therefore, the figure for the 1909 Creek
age SasireducedalnHdl
P Thu figures for the irrigation sprinklers onl •
the sprinklers maintained by Division 83, y involve
The figures for Division 83 Staff
Superintendent and 3 park Operations supervisors,inolude 1
6
t
:
The following Shows man-ho=-a spant on particular
projects, The biggest time consumers are traO/litter
cleanup, trim mowing (which lasts 10 months), and athletic
i
fields (softbnll leagues play for 9 months at Central Park).
La4JECT * *b~ oU s
Trash/Litter Cleanup
06144
Trim Mowing 50330.44
Tractor Mowing
Maintenance/Inspections 1675,85
Lightin Pla 1637,33
g/ Yground Inspections & Repairs 637,54
Irrigation
Building Maintenance 1104,00
Athletic Fields 15G7,57
Ground Works 4130,58
Paperwork/Training/Meetings 1517.58
*Special projects 1214,23
2498.35
* special Projects required a large amount of time, but
thin was due to the 1988 Pepsi Games of Texas.
The Man-hours shown does not show total man-hours for
FY87-8e1 but the differenoe in man-hours between projects is
accuratri,
Regular special projects and Events which Division 83
provides maintenance or supports are am followa:
Armed Foxcea bay
park Dedications
Chriatmae in the Park
Concerts in the Park
Aggie Womenis Tournament
0 TAAF Tournaments
ASA Tournaments
Star Festival
Brazos Folk pest
Weekly and Weekend Pavilion Rentals
• M180ellaneous Goodwill Events
D
a`
w
PARKS AND NAINIAIPCO AREAS UP 10 19d3
DIVISION AT CONSISI[0 DI 14 LNKL0KLE5
U i
- 47,2 1 3 10 2
tCH 2 HAfNfIY MITER [ASICAfE PARK I -
CASIOAYC MEDIANS EAIR9ICV PARK__ .
OAK PF0.K 7,5 4 - 1 - - -J1 6 1 PARWAY PARK 119 NAYNL 011H PARK 2 - -
UHCLH CCNIEA -
_ 8
-_f4L ICE OLPA IWENf A
_ iN0'_U PAAKI!.~. 16 BEE Ch EK 6ARK 4 rK - 2 _ _ 1 - --j~. 4 UWONTACC PARK'- 15.4 1 4B11SONPARK 9,2
7f2
SUBIOIAL -5-_ PAAKS, JGFN1AIHtO AREAS, ANO ADDITIONS FROM 1985 YO 1965
OIYISION 85 A06E0 11, EMPLOYEES FOR A TOTAL Of 25 EWPLOYEES
~ y
:j
N
ANDER 509 PARK w»
ROCNfit PE)!D PR
`I
8A88 11A0 PARK
GEONDE K. FITCN PA K
ZY W
ICBM l AAK-- } 2
WEARY OAKS PARK
~ 1 2
Ahft FAE[ PARK O 2 I 1
SwIWN000 AI PIEf IC 44,7 6 -5 ! 2 - 4 «j- 418
CITY WALL -jz-
uFIRE SIA110N N om- ,GS -
SEE CRECK PARK 1 + 1 1~ 28
420 6 1 6 14 4 2 1 5_. .)OY
PAW, 9AINIAINtO AREAS, AND A60111045 TAM 196S-190
_ OI YI SISIN 87 CAUL INU POS1110N5 TO (ORCSfAY LEANI NO 25 (NPIDYEFS
12,
yNL I
~ANOERSO(IAAK _
O54
ct CACCK PARR - j -
CY NILICR PARK » Yd I -
POLICE
NFNSuI PEAK
R-I jD CA0.1ER PAAK r(_-1{ _ _ _
• yl 1 I 1
_ 91
UhYN[ SNIIN Ph 0.1
WIND W(d PARR I ~ S w., _ -
r s
FRCRA[OIOAfSI PARK`S j_.- 2` 2
_SAPM I PARK _ y ISlf 2 - - -
NESItNC51GR PARK 10 I -I 2- 2 -
._..._....~._.~5...
LICK [RF CK PARK
-iRAlH SlAlldl p,5
_ iIAE 61AI~0N A2 2
[AN0 7711E ENIRARCL
ANDCRCOpf NONE O.S - `
PurAl.
40NoMUN l IY DCYELUI'MLPI 0, 5, v
-75 -MAL 0 L A 1 2 7 0 I 7 0 0 1 ( O E4S "
r,RANO 101 Al IV9 It 71- Tj A 7S 4 11 A6 - IS 5 7 77 jf 1 <h7
o
w
o
The information provided in this report only shows the
major areas maintained. Not included are the several miles
of sidewalks, ourblines, fencing, parking lots, water
fountains, benches, bleachers, etc.
Division 83 manpower has not increased proportionately
with the increase of parks and maintained areas. For the
past few year.e, Division 83 has been Allowed to hire 3-20
hour seasonals and 6-40 hour aeasonals. This has helped to
some extent, but the 40 hour seasonals only work 5 months of
the year and the 20 hour seaaonals usually work 20 hours or
leas per week. All seasonal workers are utilized during the
mowing season. It is common to mow 10 months of the year.l
so the seasonal workers are mainly used for trim mowing
The problem from lack of manpower is grounds work,
structures, and facilities cannot be properly maintained.
Many of. the parks which were constructed five years ago,
have started to deteriorate and need more attention than was
required in the past. In order to provide the time needed
to keep the parka safe for the public, leas time will be
available to mow.
Division 83's present standard procedure requires the
parks to be trim mowed once each week, Due to the increase
in highly maintained areas (City Hall, Fire station $11
Polioe Department, Cy Miller park, community Center, and
Richard Carter park) and the increase in parka, this
standard procedure has become difficult if not impossible.
In order to properly maintain the safety aspects of the
parks and continue the proper upkeep of the highly
maintained areas, the standard procedure for mowing the
parks has dropped to every 1-1/2 to 2 weeks
On average, all of the parks, maintained areas, and
park additions have increased 206,6$ since 1982, The
increase of the division 83 staff has only increased 64,3t,
In order for the maintenance otaff to inorease along with
o the maintained property increase, Division 83 would need 29 r
additional employees for a total 43 instead of the present
23.
p
0
0
CA
•
4
The following shows tho increase and decrease in
Division 83 employees since 1982,
k~'e~d1 Year ~nr_ease/4eoraade Total
Before 1983
FY 82-83 14
FY 83-84 +5 19
FY 84-85 0 19
FY 85-86 +6 25
FY 86-87 0 25
FY 87-88 "2 23
PY 88-89 0 23
0 23
With the improvement in work procedures over the years
and the
neces use of more advanced equipment, it would not be
sary to increase the Division 83 staff by 29 employees,
in order to maintain all parks, maintained areas, park
additions, and many other Stems and still meet the original
maintenance standards, Division 83 will need an estimatao A,i,
more full-time permanent grounds workers, if the ParkeLa,;d
Recreation Department receivod 'a full-time Irrigation
Technician this would re0ijoe the needed ground workers to
10, Crew leader personnel is sufficient to supervise the
increase in grounds workers,
The following shows how the increase in staff would be
utilized,
Uallfield crew - 1 OW
*Trim Crew - 3 GWs
Souti_• h_hiatr
Hallfield Crew 1 GW r
Trim Crew - 2 Own
10
O f Njl t ~ : < S X1,1
f 5
1
•
1
r .
j
YZe.~~ QiBtriat
Hallfield craw 1 aw
Trim craw - 2 GWe
* More ground workers would be needed in the East
District than other districts because of the higher number
of maintained areas. Some of these parks take more time to
maintain (oaks, Richard carter) and the ballfield draw
spends about 9 months' of the year maintaining central
Ballfields.
,
The South and West Districts could ho3iso three more
employees each. The Bast District would have trouble
housing the four requirod additional omployeos unless room
was made through shop renovation(
The West District has transportation for three more
employees, The South District would need some type of
utility vehicle (Cushman, eto.), but could possibly survive
with present transportation. The Last District would need
additional transportation, possibility with some type of
utility vehicle.
In past years, improvements in work procedures and the
use of more advanced equipment has helped in the maintenance
of the parks and maintained facilities, Now what is needed
is simply Moro manpower.
-
•
1 1 ~
1
iA
•
•
.fir. a .n .a ti.. .f. `P.r ! Y4r.t e .~fy!/sa t! r.! }S lt: .:1{II fvlra;.~a
t §I{{~ ds+
( Ff
m J
SY
. J
1
1
~nfJ ~ R ~yll S>t Y Itt,
QQQQ Yo cierv {ray.', e Area r
4 ,
:orpuFl tyhrltlll ~ r. _ - - _
ArilEiplan I `
Mon (4111 to
D1AIlau „I t
Irvirlff '
Nlttlls~fd~arr 1 :l '
Au ailii nM1 E ,
Addle oil
Carroll lot)
.
~ i~iltarr
r
l7oauw
1: rliusl3 's eJ : ~ ~ ~ t
I
>t liar mer$ Ear atrtall
I
Orutid hruirle
I•Itlf>gl ,1 ~ I ~ E ~ + t
Trim . i
,I + E
Lewisville 4 n ~ ~
t
4 10 12 14 1S 18
~I~quuiie Mllcri/t3iutlaq
• o ;
_I
~a
♦
'it'e :tr"'r . :t CoSit Per Capita
`f
a
~Mf~Zrqultl~ ,``~~~1`~i•.`~`~•w•,`1,."`~,4y ' ;
~U rs r hub C iv r l ii l l =
t
Ills,
t
Formers St urtnlt
rl $20 $40 $00 $80 $100 $120 $140 $180 ~
Cost Per Capita
* I*irtr 8itplifousloll I prat Ofily
k,
• 4
m
1
Population Density
Houston _ -
ltiii,
Da Ilaa
Austin
Arlington
Rlohardson
Mosquito - _-J
Irving - - WN '
_ -
Corpus Chrlstl
Addison WJWm
Carrollton -
Mm - -
D
enton -~1~1]
Desoto -
Dunoonvlllo - - -
Euless
Farmers 6ranoh
Grand Prairie '
Hurst _
b Plana
Lowlsvllle l
I
a ~aoa ~aaa 3000
4000
4
y~
r„c4.
0
a
0
. S•^,
Emergency Incidents s
J:'Ier 1,000 POPU1< tion
Atlington
Corpus Christi
Mothi
mesquite
f2lohards1511 ti~tij ;
Carrollton ,~~~~~~SJ l €
Denton
Desoto
A Ounoonvills
Eule4ja
Farrnmre granoh
Grand Pralrle
Hurst
Piano
LowlsvIlle,
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
L ~
.t
1
l t f~ 1
r
C
_ .Y ~.-•[Sf3San_r~_.:1: }a..]_..... __._t ~.Y ~~..~~x'..~~_:~~~.t. _-c____...~._~..~._~_~.'u_-_.z _.f: _a_ u~.~^. ~..'.^i_~lx.•?~:~¢.c-
TYLER POLICE DEPARTMENT w 2 71991
,M~w CIIY ~1A~ AO~~ i1FffCF.
MONTHLY STATISTICAL REPORT
,
i~
DECEMBER 1990
YEAR END 1990 €I
it
PREPARED BY:
SAMMY L, CARROLL ~i
CRIME ANALYSIS UNIT
OL •
r
i
.
r
TABLE OP CONTENTS
PKUI)UCIlUNUOAIS ~NUTAVAl1.Al3Lr~ PAOC1
PART 1 &2 CRIME'
- - - AOEJ2_
INCIDENT REPORTSTA'I'S
MONETARY VALUE STAYS PAOI's d 1
PART I MUI 1'I YEAR COMPARISON PAUL"s 5
ARREST SIA'15
INVCST10AT10NS DIVISION MONfH_LY STA'[ 5-~~__-- PAUE? 7
OPERATIONS DIVISION MONTI-ILYSTA'IS PAGE 8
OPERATIONS DIVISION MONTI ILY STATS PAUL 9
T -CEINICALSERVICESMON114LYSTATS PAOEl0
COMMUNITY RI?I.A'IIONS MONTHLY 51'A'IS NU1 AVAII AAL} PAUE 11
TRAININO MONTIIl Y YlATS NOTAVAILr1E1LF PAOP 12
CALLSPOItSERVICE MONTTILYSTATS_ w PAUL; 13
MILPAOE SPAT PAGE ld
111FI)VONE REPORT UNIT STAT S PAUti 15
yr.~. irNti_+rW J k a MirY.A6 vYYC.JWliA Y 91'%•• i r-.... .
1
e
PAN 2
at t' ISE-~ ll1iCf 14111 R 1990 DECEMBER 1984 1990 YI~AIt };NI)~~ s TR
39 Y7?A~ Nll INC'I2AI 1 'l
l'Yl'C k1 I', ACt, CLEARM REP, AM'. CLEARLD RIT, AC[', CLEARED P,y AEI, CLIiARED DITMASE
~N s-_..._.__. # # - %_c I~
p ~~1oM1C1DL 1 1 d o 0 v o%~ 12 12 3 67% 10 ]a 10 100ry ,E 2 200
- {
i,A SEXUAL ASSAULT 0 0 _2 200% 4 4 4 178 70 64_91V~69 65 59 - 91ST _ 5 7.7°,cf, '
f2 y~2U1311hRY13 13 42 ]S%~-il4 13 -l 8%f 165 164 -~75 --46%rJ 186 184 ` 86 47% 2G .10,9Vl
i t ASSAULT 21 _23 9 39/r 14 14 12 3G4U4 d03 260 6S% 0 938 29G W le 6S
192 cd
,BURGLARY 163 163 37 -233'X 150 147 39 27% 1869 1853 SO 31% 2334 2308 739 32% .455 •19.7%
t
111f,1?1 S 1 520 _ 127 24 ~ 447 451112 25% 5551 3516 1554-- 29%J SS00 5461 1419 20 55 _ 10;cJ,
c~
ALI 1'0'1'IIkTF 36 35 6 17541 37 34 8 24%, 484 453 151 33441 408 155 385E 45 11.0iiF 1
'TOTAL PART 1 1 757 755 9,44 Mj 666 656 176 27% 8563 8471 2710 32Ve), 8830 8174 2764 32% •303 11.5Sc~1
P ~fON•AOGASSAUL`t 80 80 800 1004f1 69 63 55 87%I 1189 1187 963 81%v 1031 1027 779 70 160 1565';;
A l'OROLRY 17 17 7 4154 24 24 8 13%u 181 181 _ 68 38%I 317 117 8.0 255_1 136 _•42,9170+
FRAUD - 2 2 1 SOtiff ~I
2 2 2 100 9j 4 34 11 50ro 47 46 17 37% 12 2G1/r~
T 1111N7GLLA4LNt 0 _0_ 0 o_ 0 Q 0 0!0 0 0 O,r 0 0 0 0% 0 OA%'
,CRIMINAL MISCHIEF ~ 110 140 9 6%J 110 ' 110 4 4%' 1378 1378 127 9%1297 1296 173 M3 f 82 6,A!ll
2 SEXUA10171 LFNSF8 3 3 0 01"(1' 2 2 0 0%) 45 45 15 33%u~ 28 28 8 29% 17 60 7°/,~
Y Ohi ENSI 5 0 0 0 O o 2 2 0 0 25 S 7 28"T 16 16 5 31; c I 56 3o,;
DISORDERLY CONDUC 3 3 3 100%; 8 8 5 635'0 101 101 74 73ch I89 187 117 63~ 8G 46 OS'0
--I____._~__ 86 {i
RUNAWAYS 8 8 S 63%r, 16 16 14 $3% 208 208 186 89 228 228 189 83% 20 48%1i; ~
'I'O'FXLPAKr2 253 253 103 _ 42/ 227 227 - 9_39N 3161 3159 1457 46%d 3]53 3145 1368 "43% l4 U,4S~i
IWAL PART 1,F 2 1010 1008 289 29%I 893 883 264 30, 11724 11630 4167 36% 1203 11919 132 SSf - •289 49i F
CRIMB ANAM IS UNI
, . , N.Iwf« w41!L, r'.- Win,.,.,.
M 4
• 1
•
h•-.. r,. .r.-,,.. .4P6.vs Nt. •+xn€4Utis «na.yww:. .Y
r
4 -
PAOE 3
NC'IDEN7 DITI MSI?R 1990 DITEMBP.R 1989 1990 YLAR CND h939 YEAR CND INCREASEMEG CASE
il'YPII R1,11. AM'. REP, ACI RIP ACT RCP AM # %
HARM AC'CIUI N'IS 1 0 0 1 1 ' 12 12! 13 13 •1 _ 17%,
iNL1iiIL BHl S 4 4 8 8 51 51 8 -----7 «7 34 65'r I~
0 10. 12 12 -2
5UI(IDI _ _4 4 _1_ f- 39 39 -32 W 32 ? ~2i9%
11 12 so so 108 108 --13 _..__..13 _..137 144144 ...___'249t,~`~'._--i'
~ I SINUp ]RSO,~gll)I 1 -19 19
L S'! PROPCR'I'Y 3 S 8 8 79 79 95 95 16 •168% ~
YOUND PROPERTY _ 26 uu26 30 ~ 30 335 ~ 335 476 - 376 41 10 gey. 11
69 69 76 76 743 749 858 858 r •lls 13.4%
CA I NIP, ANAI,YS I S UN tf
• FOUND BOD1139 =DCA'l11 l3Y NA'IRUAL CAUSES
V 1A .1q t.
t
1
S I OI I_iN/RKO_VENY VALUIS PAG E' 4
INCIDENT UIC1M131sR 19911 1)L'sC.'IshII3I:R 1939 1990 )'II'-AR INU 1939 Y1?AR END INCItI;ASI,/ UI:CRL A51.
311~~ f
_ S1OLI N SIO[ EN E S1'OI I7N STOLEN ASIOUN TPERCf NI' J~
ROBBERY
IUROLARY . _ _ f - $6,630 - - $3,021 $45,512 $60.520. --f- {$14,703)..__.__24.x_"°,..
i
5141,643 _ X
S1,637,431 _ $1,901907 $~6147G 11 gc
S91_129 ! 2-._-
I
~'1IIL I'1' S136,666 S135912___! $1,759,598 - _ _S1,S8G,d19 $173179 d
10.9114
M I
U7'U 71IL 1'C 5203883 5163,339 , $2,136,664 S2165.176 $21438 1.0%
I'O M'SI'O1,L'N 3 2 391.1 S5,629,505
t 5714022 (34,517 1,S,c
'!'OTAL RI?COVIiR q 151,984 S1321104 I $1,780193 $2034,396 5254703
11ACENTRECOV i. 31,176 33,65 31.6no 35,6% I
OWL' ANAUSN UNIT
s o
r t
O
a~
O
1
PART ONE OFFENSES MULTI YL+AR COMPARISON) PAOF, S
-
~F~~S~ " TSA - w"'~" AFA '~TSY-~JUA v~ --~"~l4 _---"aUd "-3EF' `~Zfi HOSE ~BL'0 fibfiA~'~
19A1 0 I 0 0 I 12 d 0 3. 1 ~ 9 i~
1959 1 J 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 S 1 0 14
1989 n I I 1 I 0 I I ) I 9 0 10 ~
` 1941 I 1 0 I I, 12 0 0 1 3 I It
5:, A 9. 6 11 1 ~I•I
>1SSAl1L7 19A' 3 I fi 3 I Q 10 8 h } ) 3 67 it
198A S 6 h S 12 8 9 d 8 3 S 81 i,
1459 5 9 3 11 4 3 3 3 4 6 6 4 65
19911 ? II S 9 9 3 12 1 I 4 6 0 10 ~j
t0 ERY 19M 8 1 1 Is 2 2 13 ji 1 16 18
1981 16 12 6 14 9 17 21 10 8 9 10 9 149
19Y3 18 12 11 6 9 I2 II it I1 21 It 11 148
1929 16 18 11 1$ 16 14 16 19 11 13 1) 13 i61 I
Am 9 10 22 10 1 I) 72 11 11 14 16 13 164
A00. M6 .I
ASSAULT 1987 24 20 15 21 n 30 2A 46 )1 21 18 29 40
198A M 25 ?0 IP )5 44 M JJ 27 - 'I 19 313 ri
1989 1,19 16 :14 7 :9 31 45 39. 14 tl : 1i . !4 )33
1970 21 20 31 3) t1 43 ~S )1 42 3A 11 7J 403
RO A I d Itl Iw in J I 16
1 1987 212 111 112 132 113 251 199 33h i o w 1 V
197 fBl 1 PO 151 W 1 I Id9 )S9,
E9P8 141 199 04 193 163 111 201
f 196 b) t.A9 ,
1959 169 Ise 113 10) 218 113 2v )J? 2!8 211 SN 141
Zy)9 Ji
r „ 19W 114 131 IJ2 12A 174 133 lot 161 111) 16) 179 163 I83J ij
11111,1 2964.1 469 ! - 35J
1487 512 49 $.la 491 468 SI1 613 390 337 51S !q6 ..545 ~6J.1J.'I
1959 J9) dl) J 6 419 Sy! $17 3)I 453 4A) 58 7!6 416 PM
1454 456 .M6 J!J 395 $461
419 114 50l 46f 4J1 441 0? 444
1990 159 J16 493 1?3 It M 443 449, 1.8 114 +21 $M 5316 `
. A To 1 , 16 L' 9 4. 4 1• .l 114 TNEhf 1937 41 19 'M 6S )1 :0 11 J) +6 JS 160
194 M 23 35 41 M' 19 J,l !1 SJ .0 41 413
II M ?A 19 24 LS Jl 1S 38 M 4 40
.
1990 .4 21 v) 4) M J) $9 4! 40 M JS 45!
V A IV;' 614 h L• 659. W3 2 903 6) ; 9 ;yv y
1961 R20 116 7)9 643 1IS sm I4J) 1019 N0
P19. 1h1 dl6 9)+1
19S 8.~1 112 671 111 810 796 A13 A40 621
AS) 143 163 9198
1499 119 611 04 602 111 81! P16 P22 7.113 m 6$1 6!6 Atll ,
l97t) dS1 616 611 610 761 I10 1+4 IN - 721 713 793 N3 6171
CRIME; AKAI 1'SIS UNIT
tf OM 1CIDL NbIE A MINU.t f 270Uk t? 2 NI)ICATFS UNFtlUNDIiU FR01i A ARfiV7tliIS MONII I
0
1
, ' rl
A
..,r,r f r.s...::: r<.- r k.a>yr.s -w.E>,-W.,I f4w+ta.on~)vffrH,.a.•.».w'NccasnffVSN.~ 4u f*.i veuHt~,Wry(.WMtK4`t'tap)i; (2 4
S
RREiSI STA'IISIICSFUR 1990 Y
7UNSI ' 13I:R Ur;CI yfIilt'.~.e. k0 E,6 ['YPN CE, - _ ~ ..]990 1990 :.198. INCkI A5r?/1)r'sC12E;h5L? .
1939 YEAR ND
I
YEj
Y ~tfO1q[CII)G
vS f . G AFtE3Yt) - Nt11113I -Ji 1),R NT
-i 7 1 , a
A SGXUA ASSAUG! - - - 0
It 1tOI1I3riRY - - 12
0.
I 7 _
l' A(JCIRAVAfEI)ASSAUII 2
- -3G 1G,G7~ot
' IIURCIGAI2Y~ - -
129
I ;'ITI[ I' _ . _ _T 41 -
84 y 1002~~- j _ 531a 3 - 2 21"
0 1,1
UfU'I'I1Gl r _
1 122 13.S6STO II
I'OTAGS PARTUNls" 105 i 106 28 ' •aS,3~~r.,
NON,AGO ASSAULT 1319 1196 1 123 10.28%
r OROr I2Y - - ~l6 339 257 _ 1 g7 31.91 ° [
78 2 44 G2°c
0 2 12 + - -
fill I
!
- -2
R I QUOKIASVS 95 121 26
2149M~
6 - 24 - ! 454 431
,j
1)15URI)fatl YLUNUUCI; i 7 - r
115
3'RO511111lIUN~SUJ fCIL~ 4 C9 122
44% 1
~.a 27 --~--.,27 loo.
URIJCILAW--
2 I) EI 1T 17- 13 1 27G hO _ 00
_ •154
35 51
~,4 23 08
l-
'UE3LICiN7UXICA"I'IUN - - 5
_ 322_ _133 ~7,OI( I'Ul'AI S 1'AR1"11VU 146 1
.56 982 -
55 I 2743 875 !07 - ~1223~0
' 3072 O IMAM) IUI'A1.5 I 329
12 l
2Sl ' I 2Gl I VOL
4263 20G 4,83
QhftOAMlS UNIT
0
'
"r t
t
PAOE7 1
INVESTIGATIONS S' ATS 1990 DECRM11NR DE E3Ml1LR~ 19% 1989 1 ELI OfRr '
_ 1990 1989 YEAR B14D YEAR END
f
CASYSASSIONE-D 474 404 5,567 6,7021
16.9"4%
CASB SUSPENDED 137 2371 2,'100 4,291 .44,1%
CASISCLEARrDlCLOSED 257 2401 3,274 3,512 6011
DISPOSMON RKIE 54,0% 81,03i~ 55,0% 71,4%
CASES I7LPD 1* 64 45 E 652 562 16,01/01;
TOTAL ARREST 50 27 441 247 7851/)`!
FI NCINOOPERATIONS 0 ~ 0 ~ 2 •75,M
1'OU l'll
l G
CASrSASSIONED 29 42 ! 530 581 CASES SUSPENDED 8 4I 72 2401 •701.*1
CASES C'LRAItrD/CLOSPD 44 44 507 4501 12,7%
DISPOSITION RMV 1511 07cc 10210°' 122,5% 92,7Ve 32,1%
CASES FILED 49 + 14 233 83 18011%11
L
TOTALARREST 71 2 64 55 16,4
S.LU, I
Dr?LIVCRYARREST 0 2 65 20 225.0%,
POSSESSION ARREST R 2 621 80 ?2,SMr'
TOIA[ CASES 4 151 198 891
12251/
DRUOSSI1/ED(DOLLAR AMT',) $4,055 $6,465 $79,538 5190,0961 •58,251,
SE.ARCIIWARRAN'ISSEiRVEM 1 339 _ 44 11,4~rj
- - - - -mow ~
"Wk-SNOT0flEt9'1000MNgill.EU COW ANALYSIS VIM
i
~ 0
•
a
•
i
;l
~n to
.J ,...-,..•t -s ,v..,u•,r~ys•!en>--+aXJ=}:.ro.~t.7,d'ff'rS+Y•.uuYvlig4?!~~Fyar{~, „dKns4 }d~,~
ql'f [tAl ION4 DIVISION SIA I DLC 1 1990 r i)1T 1989 END ~ ~ 1989Y A r
19M)YR1i~f) 1IRCL\"1
Sl111 [ ON14 11 .219 109611,08 11 30
!S 7S
,1VL,tUNI•fSITRDAY SHICI11AVO f 13,29 13114 13,85 1295 6,9SM,~
SI1111' 1'141ILL 10,00 J086 10,70 1 10.90 i ,l.R3rln. 4
f 0'87 1124 0.91 36,26%,":
[7TOT
-TIC A1S; \11 17Ilo 88 5'r
36.Z3 98,87 16.061 7, ,v'
'x' + _
51I111'ONf 16,638 ~ 16635 ~ 202.2!5 k Z07.222 1 2,42~/r
illl.fi5 SHI[ 1'f>1O f 15.319 246,493 ' i
UGa,rv~
DRIVEN 20.184 2 ,18.070
SHl1'1"l I1RGEs 15.031 15,75S i1 191,248 197,242
TRAFFIC UNIT 1,010 i 980 1 14,522 18619 22,(y)hr~
•LOIA1 S 51038 ! 53,554 654478 671.153
r ! 1
2,48VU 3
SI111 l Ui1'ls 1 - t ; -8 3 166,6 7
Sf'
11-1.1,1 ITODEN"iS Slfll"l•1AVO 0I l f 3 S c".
SN1II-P llJUEi 0 ! o l 10 3 ' 233 ,337c
TRAPPIC UNff' 0 j 01 O l
2 : 104.00;v
_ 1blAIS, li 21 211 11 _ 61;$4;'cl
~ ll IIZ(rLfll)I i SIII["1' OiVli 3 0 . 300,00S'n
.1,1.1 ACC'IDEN"I'5 Si1111'lWO 0 1 2 2 O.OOS'' G~
SHIP], 0 1' 800.0VIP
1RA! 1 IC iiNl I 1 14 1 50 0
TOTALS O 4 I 4 100,00 c;
I ~ II
II 11110--( INfS SIIfI~I'UNI~, 1116635 1116,635 8120',2151 31207,222 V'Irl ,
"I:R 1111.1: DRIVEN S111!'1'11M 0,11.4,359: 1120,184 3!246.493 ; 5,248,070 NIA
51111 I"I1J12[,f.? 0,115.01 ' 01 S.755 101191,248 ! 31197,242 MA `
'112,1111C UNI I 011010 ~ 01850 0{14,522 ~ 418,619 ; N/A
_ 1151,03S i 2/53,554 211654418 131471153
,Y.-__.._ ! 11122 • I 779 774 8.736 - 27...__-~
CIT I IONS ISSUED' HIVARDOU5 27,31
\f,LSlllf'I'S NON•IIA7,ARbOUS 890; 329 141521 10,923 ! 32.04%:
1 r
WARN1tOSISSUF'D HAZARDOUS - 816 1,049 9,114 4.161 1120J~r
NON-HAZARDOUS 9651. 286x1~~ 9,33331 2,779 23554~/c.
CRIAIF ANALYSIS UNIT
-~_.~,~.~w:r..r,ww+_.~.-.:.r..,., ubcaW PtiAY:W111('SA~I::~gYY.._ • y. r
, t
;
t
-.r.. .-_~..,.u . a x•r ria+sy, .d.r H.n.r+bMtary,;SY't4:M+L 4jl~l~.i{i:~
PAC1, 9
OPI.RATTONSS'(ATS1990( ONI'INUED) - - DEC
DE.C 1990 ~ 1989 Phk C [;N I' +
_ ~ - - _ 1990 v 1959 _ 4 YEAREND ! YEAREND
ACCIDI,AIS: TOIAE. 263 247 2604( D44 11,09~0~' `
PROPERT'YDAMAOE 134 161 ` 15381
f489 3.29,161
p, ?
rATAL.ITY 2 i_ 0 ! 6 14
I LRSONAL INJURY 112 86' 1045 517 + 2, 1. 2.9 ,13
I'N[
IAC['ICALUNI'1; ~OTALARRESI' _ - v f0; 5i 66 `_-48 37.5Vt.,
PROPERTY RECOVERED ~ S2,270 52826 I $31.756 $18.162 74,8$ 9('a
R1 PEf1T'OI IH DER ARREST 0 0 12 I 9 3313nr~~
U1SI;S FILED WITII D.A. 5 d 71 76
G,53~c,
WARRANISISSUTA) $ ! 2' 59 I1 ; 436,30
- -'WARRAN IS SERVED _ 7 ; 2 56 7 lOD [)0n.'
\l 15C YAlT10LUN1['UAYS
'i 1,154 1_•_ _ 1072 13,120 j 10,757 I 2L91f"v,
1'A IR01, STA 1 S. TOTAL PATROL CALLS E 0521 3.309 ! 43,288 1 40,862 ! $,9470
MAN DAYS 1,420 1,420 164 41 1 13,021 ' 24,4dM:f
CESAIATROI UN[rDAYS 551 i 304 i
fOVINO _
\i 3.80
11tA1TIC'VI01.,; SHII'CUNE; C'1'1'A'110;IS ~ 783I SS1;~
9696 6688 44.98;'f
WARNINOS ! 773 188' 7,106 ! n i
i SEI11'I"IlVU; ' 25261
CEI,/\-[IONS 1b9,_3,c
71 S 7I5 12038 6714
WARNINGS 851 '
340 I 11286 2206 411,6Vf
SIfill' 11 TEIREE; CITATIONS + 171 I 19.1 2810 2021 i d2,f117i
WAItININOS 157 47 r 1968 921 113
TRAFFIC UNIT: CITATIONS ` 360 ~ 281 i III
5510461)11 17,46%'
h WARNINOS i 111 I 411 1839 _ 675 172;447~i s
SCAT f3E1; I'; CI W11ONS 202 317 ! 35751 4225
WARNINOS 84 62 C 1536 I 15 34~"c
DOISIEP; C'ITA'TIONS 0 0 d 9i 2[d,ll$ci
0
WARNINOS 517 ` 1U0,00M.'
GRAND TOTALS; 0 0 i 0 i d94 e 100.OOHy'
CITATIONS ' j
2,231 21138 33,689 24
c~
.{iS ! «.8.S6 35
WARNIN-<
1,476 677 ~
~ ' it
9351 7.3161 221'S~,~
,ttic~c~: -0 `A'
, i
its
S
O
{
r~-- PA
Il ctlNICr11 SCRVICI' sr/us 1990 DI CEMBER bI C[;111[3£.R 1 r 199{} 1989 T _ Pl RC I N r I~
199.0 1489 YI?AR F~Yb WAR END I INCA)LG
PRISONTRS PINGCRPRIN JED `
161 246 2431 2320 4,8 vc:f
I
f
r
CMI.RNS PROCf W 24 42 569 519 9,6nrj
i
i I ?
11,\Gi Rl'R1Y1'C0111'ARISONS i 71 ! 12f 1 461 471 •2,15'c+
s
C1tf11L SC'I:\1:S PROCESSED
76 I0~ i 950, 1243 -230i'
~ 1 I Irj ~i
PINGERITISIS IDEN"I'1CILD
17 20 134E 57 I35 I~~F t
C'ASI?S11ADE,BYPI\GtiRIRINTC0,1'IPARISON 4f 4
37 2] 76,2
CR IMP ANALYSIS UNrT
r
~ v I~ i r rtn',x~ t
p',t t., i i iS t
,
t fl
11 1 ~
i1. i ~ 111 , Y
t i 1. t i. ♦ ; Ili
~ i
r 1Y tJ{{_,a1. V!pryyf S.?SQ~~.'1i~+,Y~I xS+12M~r.YSwr,+
G]!•• f.•Y Y)$^t;IYP ni M1t(tYMIy': ♦tlYJrv'~v..ap ~,.I.NV, w s +.1 .,.^x W . Y
TYLER POLICE DEPARTMENT ;
CALLS FOR SERVICI
PERIOD: CALENDAR YEAR 1990 VS. 1989.1W & 1987 PAGE 13
'-I-
YEAR JAW ~FE[; MA APR ~ } A
MAS' JUN j Jlll AUO SEP f UCP NOV DEC
] 487 , z o , 1 ~.s=f
lO7AL'•I
3,G21 31w S0 3,783 3,143 X13 27 f 3,9741 81191 4,069 ~
3,415, 3,722 45,233
j
0C'ALENDAR YEAR ~ 3,6211 6,877 101G6S 1 14,4081 18,335 22,3091 26,500 30,569 r 34,3771 38,096 ~ 41,511 ! 45,233 ~ f
1988 3,467 f 3,133 3,396 3406 j~ 3,666 $8 4 319661 3,687 3,737 44,152 i
S$ 'i11.ENDAR PEAR 3,467 ,199 ' 3,9121 3 595
5,000 9961 - 13,4021 17,068 20,7S6 j 24,955 28,867! 32,762 i 9b9 2,762 36,7281 40,4151 44,152
3,7351 3,233 3,913 3,843 4162 4153 4 lS 41Z90' 4015 89 CALENDAR YEAR j l 1 ~I,251 3,961 C 3,802 f 47,484
19 {
3,735 6,968101881 14,74 18,826 22,979{ 27,165 311155 351470 39721E 43,682' 41,484 17 90 3,920 3,653 4,033 3,915 4,266 4,3921
4,534 4,409 4,275 4,317 4,218 4,107 1 $0,095 E.
0 C VS, 89ALENDAR YEAR 920 7,573 1160b 1S 521 19,787 24119 28,713 1 33122 37,3971
9U 41774 I 45,988 50,095
Ij
1'LRCEN7' i 1
INODEC SA% $9% 61% S 4% f
5121 513,
90 VS 88 - - 5`4' 5,2~/cJ S13Sf'~ SIS%
Pl,RCENI'
INCIUEC 13.1, 14,1% 16,1% 15,8% f
> a _ 1519% 16,5% 15,1% 14,7%r 141% 13,7% 13.8% 13,5%
C:4 f AIL ANALYSIS UNft
y
-.w.-...:..w. -......I.w:..e.l,.,: . Maur WY.l.a+~wYT➢Ii.Y':..?la'ry,an rM~...._.,.
11, 0-
} r
i ~,1 }i1,y 2 tS w'lt a
I
t
1
1
0
I
. . ~ r..., +rrsmnn>•.xx~tra ✓fw.v ly~ar4caYt+'...r 1,413.11 h',
p
E
1111 EA0E RITOR'I PAOr 14 ,
1'111101)CA11 NUAR YF AR 1990 VS 1989/198811987
DIVISION JrIN [113IvtAR APR MAY JUN JUI. AUG
5FY 0('f NOV --C Y '101AIS U
IYATROL OIT RATIONS F
1987 67.45.1 62,341 68.166 71,717 59,912 12,329 76,341 55.046 64,167 68.611 51,491 60,009 777,585
1988 57,571 67,538 77,870 55.511 65,493 72,439 66,731 68,638 83,168 69,814 675639 82,287 834,705
1989 71,335 71,690 61,897 70,277 69,050 56,403 73,826 54,101 78,831 56,440 72,474 73,650 809,974
1990 58,953 14,349 64,380 71658 62229 70260 `80656 016053 66,124 72,038 68,351 ,66,502` 816,553
I\V!_STI0ATIONS
1937 10.055 13,550 14,577 11,478 9,706 15,754 15,352 14,452 15,507 15,234 8,093 13,862 158,620
1988 8,163 14,154 11,584, 944 9,687 12,683 9,953 9,S9 151945 12,931 14,706 9,047 137,783
1989 13,857 12,84,4 10,954 10,742 12,058 8,744 11,064 9,257 18,193 9,299 91910 8,453 135,379
1990 8,298 16,299 13,334 13,001 ' 9.119 16,655 14;102 14,305 14.477 12,693 ' 11.108 12,531 150,522
TE,ClINICAL SERVICIS
- 1987 758 1.153 953 1,421 1.299 1,170 1,166 1,227 1,035 1.075 579 1,018 12,854 R
1988 887 1.212 1,401 856 689 1,400 1;284 1,497 1,200 876 1,177 830 13,309 j1
1989 685 1,364 779 1,081 1.015 885 1.247 790 1,670 706 2,077 968 13,273 ~a
1990 1,027 1,209 827 901 770 11243 1.512 1,037 1,228 1,203 1,442 924 13,326
0
C011,IfUNITY RFLAT70,1'S ?
1987 709 1,406 469 769 352 375 1,207 1,350 5,18 1,054 1,162 137 9,598
1988 3,561 6337 914 1,084 560 650 659 1,012 1.475 811 551 238 12.102
1989 315 93 621 281 916 388 468 392 621 798 984 890 7,267
1990 493 1,689 621 857 294 762 997 724 830 ` 1,230 680 835 ` 10,012
A
TOTAL MILES DR MR:
1987 79,037 79,450 84,165 85,385 71,269 89,628 94,066 72,075 81,251 85,974 61,325 75,026 958,657
1988 70,188 83,541 91.769 66,795 76,429 87,172 78,627 80,733 101.788 84,442 84,073 92,402 997,954
1989 86,692 85,995 74,251 82,381 83,039 66,420 86,605 64.46 99315 67,243 85,445 83,561 9(,5,893
1990 68,771 93,546 79,162 VAX 73,012 82,920 97,267 82.119 82,659 87164 81,581 74,792 990413
cALItHH ANAl,Ys'IS UNIT
e'
1
1 '1
e
W
i
1
1
I
r
. r-v •(r r.. nN.. iS'r..4ve ,b .r.5', rtss .n~.ntii1. Isnc ...,.~n,.y.~nfitxt:'M+;5rltlAl~s'ita{t-I. WT1i7.74ifr,Y:t`L~k~!'. ~'"'3.' 17t9bk~:n~SI.IYYlt67h~b'E~"~i~`~,i~t~r~~~~
TPUTIIONEREPOR'PUNPPSTAT5 PAGE is
i
PER101 CALENDAR YEAR 1990 D;
lr{ JAN F111 MAR APR MAY JUN 1UL AUG 51't UCL F'IOV 1>I'G I'U'fAIS,
1988
c;
TOTAL CALLS 3,467 3,133 3,396 3,406 3,666 3.68$ 4,199 3,912 3,895 3,966 3,687 3,737 44,15211
%TRU 16A% 16,0% 165% ISM 16.5% 14.2% 129% 111% 14.9% 13.7% 12.6% 14T r I4,60~f
TRUORIG. 555 Sol 562 512 606 523 540 534 579 542 464 528 6,446'1 k
TRU SUPP, 75 76 81 51 92 53 68 76 71 71 60 76 85011
1989
TOTAL CALLS 3,735 3,233 3,913 3,843 4,102 4,153 4,186 4,290 4,015 4,251 3,961 3,802 47,484 f ,
no RU 16,20,f 14,4% 14.4% 12,3% 14.8% 15.1% 11,7% 15.0% 13.1% 13.8% 13.9% 116 13,90i
IRU0110. 604 464 562 473 609 628 491 642 524 585 549 49.1 6,6241
TRUSUPP. 68 68 SO 59 74 48 31 38 54 60 55 36 641 h
!990
TOTAL CALLS 1,920 3,653 4,033 3,915 4,266 4,392 4,534 , 4,409 4,275 AM 4,214 4107 30,095
%rIRU 14,5% 12.3% 126% 12,61510 12,2% 11,7% 98Vo` 1.6% 12.0% 14.4% 13.676 13,5% I2,5hd
1
_ . i~
TRU ORIG. .168 441 510 492 520 514 444 $10 513 631 512 555 6,278 .
TR 81JI111, 43 4s 32 26 40 45 16 26 31 28 33 25 413
E 'DfVIDUAL BREAKDOWN:
GAVELLIAMS:
r
ORIGINAL: 233 180 193 179 180 179 116 172 181 222 195 179 2,209 j~
SUPPL E''NII NIS: 25 23 15 15 18 25 15 14 14 15 15 13 207 'i
11.11A VES:
ORIGINAL: 218 143 183 141 162 164 150 174 136 163 182 187 21003
S
UPPLEMENTS: 18 25 17 11 22 20 21 12 17 12 18 12 205 {
GIVERS
ORIGINAL: 3 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 0 17 _ 65
SUPPLEM MIS: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 ,j
ORIGINAL: 114 116 134 172 178 171 178 164 196 211 195 172 2,001 fl
SUPPLEMENTS! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~
CRINW. ANALYSIS O fT
77 z
•
„
•
i
1
h,
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES IN TEXAS CITIES k-
1990
TOTAL k F,T," EMPLOYEES PER N OF UTILITY UTIL EMP EMPLOYEES PER
CITY POPULATION EMPLOYEES 1000 POP. EMPLOYEES PER 1000 1000 POP, W/UTIL
HOUSTON 1,720,720 18,769 10.9 0 010:
DALLAS 082,760 13,194 i3,4 ? 0 0.0 , 13.4
SAN ANTONIO 962,000 9,664. ` 9,7: 0 0.0 9,7
EL PASO 6010080 31871 7,3 0 b.0
AUSTIN 489,000 6,773 1054 2.2
FT WORTH 450,100 6,493 , 12.2 0 0,0 12.2
CORPUS CHRISTI 274,470 31000 10,9 0 0,0 ' 1019
ARLINGTON 266,000 1,910 0,0 716
LUBBOCK 104,148 1,714 216 1,1 9.9
GARLAND 182,020 1,531 8,4 69 0.4
AMARILLO 10 8,8
0,772 1,394 0 0,0 817
IRVINR 166,800 1,324: 0 0.0 8,4
PASADENA 120,000 716 0 00. 6.0
PLANO 119,460 1,164 9,7 0 0.0 : 0,7
BEAUMONT 117,718 11162 9.8 0 0.0. 9.6
ABILENE 107,800 1,122 10.4 0 0,0 104
S
WACO 1051220 11101. 1L0`: tl 0.0 11,0`
BROWNSVILLE 102,110 729 7.1 0 0.0 7,1
• ODESSA 100,229 826 8 2 0 0.0 8.2
MIDLAND 99,246 906 9.10 0.0 9;1
AVERAGE H1.482 3,804 ~96 -O.8 f
• ' DOES NOT INCLUDE MUNICIPAL ELECTRIC EMPLOYES •
,
r
l I1i.,i
f t
r
s I
M
i
F
TEXAS WNICIPAL TAXATION AND 0991
1990
RANKED ACCOADINO TO POPULATION
TAN TOTAL ASSESSED COLLECTION REVENUE G.O. 0000 0.6, DEAT REVENUE BOND. REV, DEBT TOTAL BOND TOTAL 0181
CITY POPULATION RATE VALUATION PER 5101 PER CAPITA INDEATEONESS PER CAPITA 1116EATEDNESS PER CAPITA INDEBIEDNESS PER CAPITA
Houston f,7?9,720 0;630 62,032,905,000 6,201,291 225,94 1,005,560,000 627,46 1,0841304,000 626.87 2,169,668,000 1254,35
Dallas 982,750 0.588 49,299,1040823 4,9290910 295.12 648,566,000 700;65 773,011,000 786,59 1,461,563,000 1481.24
San Antonio 982,000 0,477 23,984,135,671 2,396,414 116.50 5970713,732 608.61 444,400,000 452.55 1,042,113,732 1061.22
Austin 489,000 0,575 17,699,90,321 1,7u9,999 208,13 46,520,060 95,13
Eorl Nortb 450,100 0,699 14,900,000,000 1,4900000 ?.97160 430,285,065 955.98 27,423,014 60193 457,708,879 1016.90
Corpus Chriall 274,476 01580 7,221,835,369 722,104 152,61 W,536,791 $37.52 37,60,000 131.31 18$,224;797 6114,83
Arlington 255,000 0.555 9,230,509,498 923,051 200190 216,357,000 648.46 106,215,060 416,53 522,572,600 1264.99
tubbock 194,148 01640 4,459,409,767 495,941 163,48 42,021,516 216.44 70,428,188 362,76 112,449,764 579,20
OarlAnd 182,020 0.526 6,350,775,270 635,018 183.52 99,130,526 $44.61 114,905,000 631.28 214,035,528 1175,89
AwtI110 160,772 0,404 5,061,532,992 506,153 121.19 ?,090,-o 44,10 5,960,000 37.12 13,056,160 81.22
Irv Irg 160,40D 0.439 ;.,074,725,818 807,473 221.00 ' 76,185,400 474,97 27,641,000 173,61 1041012400 648.58
Piano 131,863 01488 7,603,419,439 760,342 .281.56 172,357,327 1307,09 . 41,010,006 311.46. - 213,427,327. 1618,55
Abilene 108,03D 0550 2,534,094,184 253,4B9 129.10 25,295,316 234.15 7,746,699 71,71 33,042,017 305.86
Naco 106,450 0452 2,601,901,401 260,190 134.92 26,909,261 252,79 33,380,534 313.58 60,289,801 566.37
Brownsville 102,110 01150 1,184,941,600 11A,495 87,03 26,404,453 250.59 129,530,000 1266.53 155,934,453 1521.12
MesgA t0 102,110 0.510 3,131,804,131 313,180 156.42 41,939,141 410.73 12,555,000 122,96 54,494,141 533,69
Crard Prairie $00,344 0.580 3,872,281,133 381,228 223.82 51,094,461 568199 26,190,000 261.00 03,204,461 829,99
Nv.sSn 100,231 01487 1,728,651,802 172,865 83.90 14,761,000 147.27 41,300,000 412.04 56,061,000 559.31
Mldlard 100,118 015E0 2,W,529,23D 264,153. 152 19/4 41,7860060 417,12 29, 115,00D 296.62 71,501,060 113,74
a e+earrae_e: cre aeanenee,eavaav+eaeeea+aavaaaaeaeav ee+e naaa akaeeraaaceansne aenvn+e+eYaeaaert++eebn+aaRaru+uenne vn esanetlpaan+eraaaaaeaeaeaae aznnanrerwareerpanr+eraOaRea
-
Avera9c 353,24B 0,569 12,321407,918 1,232,161 101,14 202,279,626. 486,88 150,619,118 354.92 358,446,322 836.79 K
~ _......_-_...«._.........~_...+,........,...rrr+rarcr.araavar. l..-a. rs.... , tr
,
J l j U
! 5
i
r tr
'-t
t"
1 MAR 9 1991
C ITX OF COLLEf)E 8TATIO.`t
U T T L I T I E 8 ,
1 9 9 0
W A T E R
CURRENT WELL CAPACITY 17.0 MGD
(4 Major Wells & 1 Minor Well)
COOLING TOWER CAPACITY 17.0 MOD
PUMPING CAPACITY PROM,WELL FIELD 20 MOD
(3 Pumps)
TRANSMTSSION LINE CAPACITY 20 MOD
(Without Intermediate
Pump Station)
PUMPING CAPACITY TO DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 29 MGD
(4 Pumps)
GROUND STORAGE CAPACITY 10 MG
ELEVATED STORAGE CAPACITY 3 MG
PEAR DAY DEMAND - 1990 8/26/90 11.8 MG fl
ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY DEMAND - 1990 6.4 MGD
W A S T E W A T E R
PERMITTED TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY
Discharge Permit No, 10024 9.4 MOD
Outfall No, 001 4.9 MOD
Out£all No. 002 MOD
Outfall No. 003 MGD
i
I
® PEAK DAY FLOW - 1990 p
Outfall No. 001 4/25/90 4.7 MOD J
Outiall No. 002 12/10/90 11.5 14GD
Outfall No. 003 8/16/90 -`;045 MOD
• ANNUAL DAILY AVERAGE FLOW - 1990 ! •
Outfall No. 601 2.7 MGD I!
outfall No. 002 2.9 MOD
Outfall No, 003 MOD
i
• Y. r YVM--.~WY...iri. iY'. i Y Y!P . .i a.n ~ ~ '
1 1 ' 1 ' 1
W
•
Ndith Central Texas Council of Governments _
P 0. orawor Coo Arlington, Texns 76005.5888
- • JAN 3 01991
J4S 1
FROM: Bob O'Neal DATE, January 29, 1991
Dlreotof, Regional Date Center -i
TO, City and County Officials In North Central Taxes
SUBJECT; Final 1990 Census Population
Enclosed for your information Is a city and county level summary of the final 1990 Census
of Population, As a loon1 affiliate of the U. S, Census Bureau, NCTCOG's Aeglonal Data
Center Is your clearinghouse for census products end other Information about the region.
We know that many of you are anxiously awalting the arrival of the datalled Information
which is used In federal, state and local rediatrloting efforts; The Census Bureau reported
that this Infofmation will be made available sometime In February. As a member of
N , CTCOG, you will automatically receive regional and county level summaries of this
information for the North Central Texas region, In addition, we will send you this detailed
Information by census tract for your jurisdiction, We will also have avellable, upon
request, census block level Information for your areal
The Regional Data Center is offering as a fee-for•eervlce, custom tabulations of this
Information as a service to our members and others, We can also provids oustoml:ed
maps detailing census characteristics of your community, These ere,of tremendous
benefit when plannlnp service delivery areas of for redlstrioting purposes.
We have also enclosed for your Information `a 1990 Census Product schedule which gives
a general Indication of release dates and deaorlptlons for upcoming census products.
We are pleased to he of service to our member governsrlents, if you would like additional
Information on census Information or other services available, please call us at 817/840•
3300,
/dls Bob O'Neal
e enclosures
Conlerpoinl Tura 616 Six PIagS Drive DeCael" 1NkOh M61ro 817:940.3300 PAX 640.7606
_.r._...... . w rr+..wnt.,iYiSfM.i r^e. n:. r i i i i 1 ,
4.
1. a ,1• !I r / ,17• ~ t"9
1, .C
.ti
v
PHOTOCOPY
t990 CENSUS POPULATION
NCTCOO Rsplorir>si Data center
JarNaey 1091
~ FWW ~ 1~ 1Y6Qf1990 Pate"
OME8/000NTIEB 1060 o+lf renoe Ina4Aer r
COLLIN COUNTY s,
146,266
Allen 2191*i 118,T8f: A1,8
8,314 ;fiY,900' 120,
Anna. 0~90E
49 6.T
Cel(na 1,630 t,T,1y' 217 14.3
Fakv*w
2,360 66 1 y4•
FarrnenvMle 30 1
' ?A0 11.0
Mao* LUC" 3140p, 6,l,+ir~, 21642 79,6
1,374 0,2 836 80.
McKinney 16,266 2f 61027 30,0
Murphy
1 X64 397 34, 6
Parker
4
z ' .c 1,2,}81 19y 12.6
Plano 721931 1>:q/~5? 1SA1382 77,
hrkloeton 3,408
pr (1.007) -31.
~ 1 ~ 390 49.
Wyk CAWIBCOUNiY 3,162 6,664 114.6
1,666,386 "i 296,426 10.0
AdrNwn 6166.! 3,2W 68,2
13,746 'ry f1~. , .r 3,f1lO 26.8
40,880 41167/. 102;4
Cod HMI a ;
Cookroh HIM 6,640 10 13,127 101.
464 14.8
Copp" 8
13106¢ 341,
DsBoto 904,070` 1021700 11.4
16,631
otmc vmo 16,006 06,6
27,761 '
Fantkra 0ftr ch K ~M 7,967 96,
03
aaliand 131,17 1#~ ~ cots) .2,a
„,.Y,,'s!►'p° 411703
QkinnHelglrts 30,1
f1093 s;,f 31631 341,8
Grand PnkN ~o r 71,462 99,010 28,164 3014
Highland Park r. 81000 f,T (170) ~10
Hutchins 2,837 711 ;1
Irving 109 043 =Y~ f., (118) -4.2
46,004 41.0
Lanouter 14,807 ~
7,310 40.4
Me"uke 67,063 . $4,431 61,
nkhrdw 720416 3' $ 21144
1,
ROM" `
e f160731 201, • a
3,701 226.
Sach" - Mom
e
I
e
i
Final .t'1r11N 1980y1094 19$OV1990 1
rDEWON 0NTtES Cen$u$ !M1 .1 NutMrk61 Perc nlt 1
1910 f/Y0? Difhrerlroa Inorsa$e
Seagoville 7,304 22 8
le 11404 22x; 814 8$.7' "Irnor y Park 22,264 x,264; 6 0,0
2,367 112 4,7
OUNTY f 43660 129,966 90.6 Aubrey
464 41,8
to ak 896 1,964 828 09,0
Flower Mound 4,402. .16,6x1, 11,126 262,r
Hickory Creek
Highland Volt" 3,216 7;027' 3,781 146
Judo 920 1434 314 341
Krum 917 11644 026 89,2
Lake Dallas 3,177 9,664 479 1611
.Wwl/YNk 241273 22,248 4fi
Wile Elm 928 12!(8' 329 38,6
Pilot Point 21211. 2,836', 327 14,
40anoko 910 1,816: 708 77,
SsrWr 2,764 9, s 764 27.
Shady Shores 813: 1,046 232 28.8
The Colony
Trophy Club 1214^t1 22,17A 41713 76,3
Nil
ELUS COUNTY 4y 3,422
64,74) 66,i6~?' 26,124 42,6
Ennis 12,110 5 13,1 1,773 14,6
Fords 2,221 . (16)
ttely
1,306 iy
Midlothian 34$ 30.1
3,219 16,1~~ 1,922 69,7
Cwllla 1,017 960 4o
Palmer 1,187 1, 02 39.8
Rod Oak 1,662 3,1 1,242 66,0
Waxahachie 14,874 1x,1tb1 3,844 24;
ERAT'HCOUNTY 22,680 $,431 24,1
Dublin 2,723 6,106, 467 171
Stephenville 11,9$1 13,t10~a 1,621 1318
HOOD COUNTY 17,714 2x,461 111287 8316
e Grambury 3,332 4160x' 713 2114
HUNT COUN'TY 68,248 64,34 ' 9109$ 16.6
Caddo Mills 1,060 1,04x; 8 018
Commeroe 8,i36 'x,'w? (1,311) -16.1
Greenville 22,161 910 4.1
Quinlan
1,002 ^t~,,, 366
35,
e We$t Tawakonr 940 a t 92 11.
North CwW&l Tex" CouncM of G&4#rnrrenb
F46CWW Dam, Center ,
+ • w .yir..n.r.rdi4~,Y. :v 4YF•rl.. I ;
6+
ca ,
•
1
r
YHOTOCOP''
.
v -
con"
'MnefM X*OW ,
CE&c fN0 ,
~
Wads C 11594
JOHNSON
67,641
i
h b e 29,61 43,4%
Almad0 2,701
217 B.
Burleson 11,73/ 116,113 4,979 37.3
Cleburne 19,218 207 1616
Ofandvlew
1,208 (1 40 313
Joshua 11470 3. 2,346 160,4
K6eee 3,413 3,444 931 30.
KAUFMAN COUNTY 39,727 12,493 31;4
Combine 896 1 631 90,1
Cradle" 831 1,61C•> 821 00.8
Forney 2,493 4,0rQ 107 $3,
Kauhnan 4,60
wo 1216
KwV MaWnk 149 14,4
1.443 it7 296 20.6
TmsA 13,240 12 4iF f Tf91 -a.
NAVARRO COUNTY 35,323 ~II,idE4t 4,603 13.
Co(WAft 21,712 1,191 a.a
Kennd i,aa2 1,70' 120 71
Rloa 461 d 113 25.
PALO PINTO COUNTY 24,062 2644~ti 993 4,
Mineral Wells 14,466 ~ ,v 31 ' 482
PARKER COUNTY 11,601 ~r~ 20,176 46,
Alodo 1,027 Wy"4i 142 13,6
Reno 1,174 1,14$ 07.
Spwoown f,686 "F(A .'1 62 4,
S
WMbw Parkd iZ,dl' y~ st 2,7'66 22,
rh 1,216 104.
ROCKWAL! COUNTY 14,621 r 11,079 76,
Heat
1,4N 44 44
Rodmd 6,911 4,647..:,,: , 7&
Roy" City 1,561 Mb 4p,
$OMalrRV U COUNTY 4,164 1,201 21,
Glen Rose 2,075 . (1 -61
TARRAW w NI'm : WAS
.
• A 160,113 " 101,16 W,tl
Azle rd LOIN. 62
20,621 2~.Mf: it0,
13471 6,Ni4. 44,1
Shia Mdxb 2,iN •1.
Co" • Crowley 6,662 ,1~ ? i0
ilalwatldnpton Ordna 11100 «y,. , •
Nohh Carltrai T6ftu
r
i
Y r
1
1
.NN.M1.K!JlY1M9.~r41,. tr-.... L.r. , W.yY W'Y.W/R'YC.W'fM 1 M NrV I 1
A ,
•
Final 19645090 l owlow
Cen" ,r Numerical Peroent
CMESICOUNTIES
1990 1 Diffsronos lnasaae
Euless 24,002 .3!,149 14,147 58.9
Everman 5,317 x;672` 285 613
Forest Hill 11,6& 11,4 2 (202) -1.7
Fort Worth 385,164 447,810 62,465 18,2
Grapevine 11,601 26,202' 17,401 147,6
Haltom City 29,014 32849' 3,842 1312
Hurst 31.420 3318741 2,164 619
Keller 4,166 19,983 9,527 229,2
Kennedale 2,694 4,009. 11602 silo
Lakeside 967 .818: (141) -14,7
Lake Worth 4,394 4,691, 107 4,6
Mansfield 8,102 16,40')'' 71305 926
N. Richland Hills $0,692 li4,ay91f: 13,303 50,0
Pantego 2,491. 7,97,1 ` (60) -2,6
Pelican Say NN, i,271 1,271
Richland Hills 7,977 74"'. 1 0,0
River Oaks 61890 (310) -4.6
Saginaw 6,736 81661 2,816 4911
Sansom Park 3,921 3,929' 7 o.g
Southlake 2,608 -7,0964,257 161.
Watauga 10,294 20,068: 9,725 94,f
Westworth Village 3,661 2,390! (1,301) -35,
White Settlement 13,608. 16,77' 1,964 14,6
WISE COUNTY 27,452 81!974` 7,227 28,3
Alvord 877 8d(l' (12) X1,4
Boyd 889 Imil" ' 162 17,1
Bridgeport 3,737 9,685 (156) -4,
Chloo 890 IOfi (00) -10,1
Decatur 4,104 4AO 149 3,6
METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS
r
DALLAS-FORT WORTH r`FASA 2,9331299 9,/l111,i4 962,127 32113
(00 Counties in both PMSks) 4
DALLAS PMSA 1,959,199 ' 2, 48 604,164 3013%
(001M, Dallas, Denton, EIlls
Ksuf man and ftekwO Counties)
FOAM WORTH-AALWOTON PMSA 974,096 f'A'$ '0fS' 357,968 36.7%
(Johnson, Pariah MW Tarrant
Counties)
DALLAS-FORT WORTH SMSA L,970,616 (OMSA counties, plus Hood and
Wla Counties) NCTCOG RHGION 19 19,909 !!11,944 , s
31,
North Central Tam Couitdl of Govatnaw b "A11 r AIO kkoorpmtod
Reglonai Data Cantor 9or+tic+e: U.& Owlow okwu
ftkAdoo d0w Mod At AACTCMvovp~
1
H I M 0 R A N D U H
TOt Charles R. Owens, City Manager
noMI Alan Guard, Administrative Assistant a4
DATEt December 31, 1990
StmZ9CTt PARKS AND ROW MAINTENANCE
9ACKOROUND
The Parke and ROW Division is responsible for preparing and maintaining park
facilities, medians and ROW, and City facilities. Autivities include mowing,
trimming, facility repair and maintenance, trash pick up and litter control,
plant bed management, and repair and maintenance of City playgrounds and
pools. This analysis will focus on the mowing and maintenance of medians,
ROW, parks, and City facility grounds. The three crews primarily responsible
for these areas of activity are the Mowing crew, Beautification crew, and
Civic Circle Crew.
( This analysis provides productivity Information and the level of service
provided by these crews. Thin report will fooue on four issueat
1) What do these crews provide and what percentage of available time is used
to perform each activity?
2) in regards to mowing, how much time is required to properly maintain each
type of area (i.e. median and ROW vs, Parks) vs. the amount of time
actually spent?
3) flow du the productivity rates of these crows compare with standards as
established by the National Recreation and Parka Association (NAPA)?
d) How.do other issues such as the seasonality of work and additional
workload, e.g. acres, impact the service levol of these craws?
DATABASE
Data for this study was accumulated over the previous eleven months (Sanuary
November 1990) Worker hours used are stated as found In the database. Since
data for quantity of work (e,g, acres) are not recorded on the work order
sheets, astimates have been derived using measurements of specific locations
and time trials conducted by staff,
Historical analysis covers the period between fiscal year 1986»87 and the
current fiscal year, the acreage added during this tima, And staffing
sahodulen as provided in the actual operating budgets,
,
f p < ,
r
,
•
.
j r.
r?bat do these crews do?
1
Mowing Crew - The Mowing Crew is responsible for mowing over 95% of all City
pekks, mediana and R.O.W.S. They also now lift stations, well sites, water
towers, and the treatment plants, private property is also mowed for the
Health Deptktment, This crew must also assist with the trash pick up and
trimming of these areas.
Available hours: 2,080 per worker
- Vacation time: 80 per worker
- Holiday time: 56 per worker
- Sick time: 62 per worker
1,882 x 4 crew members n 71528
( Mowing parks (919%) u 745.27
Mowing Medians/ROW (23,80 a 1641.10
Mowing Facilities (8.04) - 602,24
Trash Pick up (10,2%) v 767,86
Trimming (14.2%) r 1069100
Pruning (3.1s) = 233.34
Daily Equipment Prop (8,6%)w 647.41
" Miscellaneous (24.2%) 2841178
7528.00
r. Total Time Mowing 2988,61 Moore
r
*Miscellaneous Activities Includes - Meetings aria training, dirt work,
facility repair, equipment repair, plumbing repair, and turf spraying)
(
.w-.~..,..« ..w.a._..r..._ • ....r:~ ~Iw.~.4+,~fit~1 W iJ bu. , i . r I f`r , rr ~r I ~ r
, ~ si tati ~ : ~x f, itY r. ~7~ f sr 1r ~ ~)rr
I 0 u - 1 rid+r nlr I? ~r1 11( (t
,;-chi
•
I
I
J~
I,.
II
e
I
l per.
lfaRK w(+auuuq ~
PARRS AND Ralf MMNQ CREW
Honda 1
Pick up trash at parks and all medians (2 people)
Mow'- deck mower i 2 flail
Tuesday
Now deck mower Q 2 flail
Trim/spray (2 people)
lied er
Mow'- dock mower G 2 flail
?rim/spray (2 people)
urede
Now - deck mower C 2 flail
Trim/spray (2 people)
( F~ ,
j
Pick up trash at parka, Main Street, and FM 407
Mau
SPECIAL NOTESi
Edgo monthly - after a rain when possible
Record areas mowed daily
Record the amount of trash picked up
Record all herbicide applications
,
t I:
.•he+~rl~..wnM.rnM~.... , , 1~I' ` 4 1 I G lltrrl 11.
• w .r+,w war. t'a 'Y( 5rr I i5 I 1 ' S ,
I 1 , rt~p titit I,~ t~ y ~I ' ~~f F~ {fi Y
~ I iii S ~ I1 a I t r,1 S 'l ~ k 1 + ~ \ G ,
0 i,r.; ~lll i}I' v+ rD +}i~ 1`}~111,~~`4~~1 ~4i ~ ~1 yf ~iiai hFr~~ S~5rf~1, 1;
- - !~r t A•. `}~':Pi, #r}:i.'Fi+"ilf r+al.t,,'(.CFI-F,r~},i~.~~,~rll(+?bl`'SA.li~,1 s~'~?~'.
1
•
Beautification Craw The Beautification Crew maintains and/or auporviaes the
maintenance and installation of all irrigation systema, They also maintain
the grounds and £lowerbedL at the following locationat Public Norka, Animal
Control, Parks Maintenance Office, P.A,L:B. Administration Offics, Fire
Station 02, the old library, the old Health Dept., old town, Central Park
Pavilion areas, the Hedrick House, and all areas with plantbeds (except civic
Circle). They started and are maintaining our now tree farm, which has 300
trace with a drip irrigation system,
Available Hours; 2,090 per worker
- Vacation timer 90 per worker
- Holiday timer 56 per worker
- sick times 62 per worker
1,602x 3 crew members -54646
Mowing parks (4,84) a 271.00
Mowing Medians and HON (1,14) b 62,10
Mowing facilities (8.11) „ 457,33
Trash Pick up_ (10,24) a 575.79
Trimming (6.94) 389.50
Irrigation Maintenance (16.8h)a 948.53
Plant Bed Management (13.0%) a 734.05
Pruning (544) a 282;30
Daily Equipment Prep, (1.73) 96.00
Reatroom Clenning (7.24) u 406.51
9
*Miacellaneous (25,24) 1422,7
5646.00
•
Total time mowing n 730,43 hours
*Miscellaneous activities inoludet Facility cleaning and repair, pool
maintenance, training and meetings, plumbing repair, equipment repair, dirt
work, and manual watering,
1
i
.,.y,e..,.,.~. ~+wn.Wa...,A. ....y ~ u wMN wwYrl wiIWOWG.v `4 mn.^.• y. '\I r
1 1 • ' ,f 1 fit iylyt iZ ,li~7 i(ii i~l 1 : , i'} i~i`d t4 :i
i'.IV'i
0
f WORK SCHKDUL8
BBAUTIFICATIQM CREW
Monda
Now, trim and pick up trash at the following areast
PALS Administration Building(s)
Fire station 12
Old Town Main Strait
Lake Park entrance
Central Park clean restrooms, pick up trash
Water beautification areas
Tollgate (flowsrbeda)
'itieeday
Now, trim and pick up trash at the following arsesi
PALS Service Depot
Valley Parkway median (flowsrbeds only)
College Street Pool (mow)
Central Park - clean restrooms, pick up trash
Campgrounds and Showers (flowerbeds)
Porost Ridge median
Wednesday
Mow, trim and pick up trash at the following areaas
Ridgeway Circle
( Hill Street median (mow)
Bellaire & 121 medians (flowerbeds)
Maadowglen median (mow)
Central Park - clean restrooms, pick up trash
Lake Park 'free Farm (cultivate fields as needed and water)
ursda
Mow, trlm, and pick up trash at the following areas:
Central Park - mow, trim, work bode
Central Park - clean reatroome, pick up trash
Hedrick House - mow, trim, pick up trenh
Sun Valley Pool - mow, trim, pick up trash
Water all beautification arena
r Senior Center - set up for dance night
rids
Mow, trim, and pick up trash at the following aresas
PALS Service Depot: - mow, trim
PALS Administration - mow, trim
® Central Park - clean restrooms, pick up trash
Animal Control - mow, trim •
Public Services - now, trim
Senior Center - set up for AARP on 2nd Friday each month
Motaes Check irrigation timers monthly.
Check irrigation sections in areas every two weeks.
Fertilize areas once every two months during growing season,
Prune shrubs in areas every other woek during growing season,
A{.
p
+l
1
1
i
1
l
Civic Circle Crew - The Civic Circle Crow Is responsible for all of the
grounds maintenance at the following facilities: Municipal Center, Central
Fire station, police Station, and the Recreation Cantor.
Available hours: 2,080 per worker
- Vacation time: 80 per worker
- Holiday timer 56 per worker
- flick time: 62 per worker
1,882 x 2 crew members 31764
Mowing facilities (6.9%) m 259.72
Trash Pick up _(23.5%) a 88444
Trimming (e.5%) n 319.94
( Irrigation Maintenance (11,74) - 440.39
*Manual Watering (4.14) 154.31
Pruning (1.14) . 41.40
Daily Equipment Prep (,74) a 26,36
Plant Red Management (14.4%) n 542.02
**Miscellaneous (29.14) C 1095,32
3764.00
Total time mowing 259,72 hours
*Thic activity should decrease in 1990-91 due to the installation of
irrigation systems around the Municipal Center,
**Miacellaneous activities include: Facility repair, plumbing repair, special
events assistance, training and meetings, dirt work', and equipment repair,
r
,r:.....+.......~+...a.......r. , , v waw r.w.. wl,Li~14:9 if W+.y:•, .1. V I r4J ,.1 1 .
V ~ LI r f J~ t ! I 'G ~i~~ll ~~t ,4 R
, f ~
4 t
' i
•.1 r i t
1 f t tt tti t
t 'S I
CIVIC CIRCLX CM
naa
Pick up trash at civic Circle
Now City hall
Edge City Hall
Slow off parking lots
7u e
Pick up trash at Civic Circle
How Police station
Now Central Fire station
edge Police Station and Fire Station
sot up Community Roan
ed e+~de
Pick up trash at Civic Circle
Mow Recreation Center
Edge Recreation Center t
Mork lode at City Hall
urrda
Pick up trash at civic Circle
Now City' Hall
Edgo City Hall
slow off parking lots
!'rider
Pick up trash at Civic circle
mow Police station
HOW Control Fire Station
Edge police station and Fire station
Mork beda of Police Station and Fire Station
O
.O 0 O
r
1
-,.-.w.......-..-......r,:•.'.b.- _ ♦ ..~,,...a... r.4((t ~ 4t rfl' if) ~~'~:Fss~c Y~"tK~~t. RiC 'q~r 1/4ti1~EL;~a(`Y~.+~~t/{~Kr~'~~tYP~iH~9 ~tYf
~kt/~~itt1~~:
/ 1 n ~ f~a
t ti•{t' /i °Y'i t 41C1f`~ tf~ t ~i ]l /~tA\~ Mt r11},i`fLLl1 i fir- l
rf ~ '1 ~ ~1 y LA' C ~1 >S h
7 7.
•
u
i
i
In roger" to mowing, how much time is reauire~ to properly maintain each type
of area (i.e. median and Row, vs. Perks) vs, the amount of time actually spent?
Each area of City maintained property has been given a designated maintenance
level (ML), as previously presented to Council, These maintenance levels, I
through V2, and the service provided are listed in Appendix A.
Chart A shows the amount of acreage per type vs, the percentage of time spent
on each area during the previous eleven months,
CHART A
ACRES VS TIME
( FACILITIES
28%
18% PS
;{f, FACILITIES
38%
RAMS ,
.:r . 60%
MEDIANS
32%
M901ANS
cox
TOTAL ACRES TIM9 SRIENT
WNW
Although facilities constitute only 185 of total acreage, workers spend 36% of
their time maintaining them, This is due to the greater detail required, the
type of equipment used, and the higher maintenance level required. Parke
constitute 50% of the total aoreage, yet only 25% of the workers time is spent
maintaining them,
r
Chart ra COfBpeKeO the amount of time that is required to properly maintain each
type of area according to the designated maintenance level with the amount of
time actually sprint on each area,
i i
r
a.e~r`1 -rn....:y♦ .,1 ~ w IW Y,nwW 4i61CiYLYC IIh^-•' , 1 { { 4
„r' r ,
•
a~
•
i
CHART B
MOWING TIME
I TOTAL WORKER HOURS
r
Coco
3000
21100
20gtl
tIS00
1000
500,
0-
PARKS MEDIANS d ROW FAC16TIEB
M TIME REQUIRED ® TIME SPENT
1006 re4ulrrd by M.L. vs iolwi Ilmo.
A breakdown of each type, by location is provided on Tables 1, I2, and YYS
attached.
Chart 3 and the supporting tables ref loot that hours actually spent mowing are
not meeting the requirements as established by the maintenance levels. This
leads to the question of productivity rates. Are the crown mowing at a rate
within standard guidelines?
How do productivity rates (worker hours per acre) compare with standards as
established by the NRPA7
WORKER HOURS PER ACRE
MOWIN13 STANDARD CITY CREW RATE
72" Deck Mower .35 .498
19" Flail Hower .13 .210
• Snead on the available data, it appears that City crews are not 'mowing at a
rate within standards established by the NRPA, However, several factors are
responsible for this variance. First, travel time has been CClnputed into the
City rate. Any designated mowing activity inclu8oa the Amount of time it has
taken for the crew to travel to and unload and prepare equipment at the
location, Time trials conducted between designated mowing areas resulted in
explaining 57% of the variance for deck mower rates and 40% of the Variance
for flail mower rates. This would then equate to rates of ,414 worker hours
® per acre for deck mowers and .1785 worker hours per acre for flail mowers, A
second major factor is that when City crows come upon an obsteale, such as a
large rock or trash, Lima is spent in removing it from the path. The time for
this activity varies and it is not possible to quantify its impact. Whom
these two factors are taken into account, it would appear that the City crow's
rates are within the standards established by the NRPA.
• 0
,
r,
TABLE 1
. ~;,EtEfAiOWINd±~. PAfiKS.;`IEiI,E`L;'.
1'4 To t , il. i;'. tt t ` .r t Er: y AI p.•~j t . I~e~ d
'i(i i ti E i~ t : i t iE!If It I ifI11'~~ >Al14`J~Q~~ ~ ~"f .;'f y~til~i ~t I I O~AL t TiJr ieIJ!~~ !E,I{i r
ii{tl Ii! tf!It! 1r: ! IrEii I ~ ~{l3~lit
i d r t { i.Ell rift iti i{`! I'.RdA }I i~l.l ~'I i r ,ELI t $ ~E ' S'~PENT ` iff~E~C
Eil~rl,!it!fa: IYttl~I
k;q!CAT1ON~fCttE:.?'iFrllE~, ff:~4! {.li:! f{nl. EE;. u( {1!~ili,!,} ECEJI{i it: ~JA~I0 ~SiQ't MPL~u'
i
CENTRAL PARK - AREA I 1 65 11,13 612,15 244.75 30.33
CENTRAL PARK - AREA II 2 46 4.75 218 130.26 63,98
COLLE E $T, PARK 3.14 28 216 70 53,75 76.79%
ELLIS'PARK 2 48 4,63 212.09 98.5 46,2159'
HIGHLANDS PARK 3&4 20 3 80 64 00.009'
IRIS LN', PARK 3 34 1,82 65,26 39 70,59
L,L, WOODS PARK 3&4 28 8 224 229,75 102,17
RALDON PARK 3&4 28 9 84 74.33 98.494
SUN VALLEY PARK 3 34 2,5 as 55,5 85,29
SYCAMORE 3 34 2 68 65.88 81.6801
CREEK VIEW PARK 2 46 3,37 155 65 41,94
VALLEY RIDGE GREEN BEL 3 34 1.37 46.58 58 124.52
MEADOWLAKE 2 46 2,37 100.02 7E 69.70
{ { 707AL ! .'s; :Ei. r I E!i; 1999,98 1237.51 `f i:I€I1 ;81s98
t
rs ~ z
`1 • ,w r.ww rwra. /1.~ •'M~. ~ r f , ~T~ s ~ ~ Y S ~I ,f~l ri i\ ~ o t } e jti i , ,~y : .
1! r 7 , its t~ ~ .~A\ F~
n I 4 r~ k t~ li ae t? 1 r i 7 I I e. t
a
AL.
TABLE 2
~1v1(~WIN(~ ;FACILITI~Sntt~!:i~.
AS51f3NEb TOTA4 ' AVEt~AGt# a1'~TAL TOTAL gbTUA y
MAINT;' ; I~f;'ij'1 MOWINd iQUR6 N91~(jSSPEN ,.'p[RCEN1'.
LOCATION LEVEL ? , OWINGS 'iTIMe 4QUIRBD'JAtV d.NOV"'901COMPLETLD
ANIMAL CONTROL 3 34 6,8 187 76.91 40,69%
CENTRAL FIRE ST. 1 66 2112 118.6 118.6 99.91°/
CITY HALL _ 1 55 9,25 608,76 469 _ 90,22
FIRING RANGE 4 10 2,5 25 36,5 146.004
HE'DRICK HOUSE 3 34 ~ 2.5 85 71 $3.53%
PALS OFFICE _ 2 46 4,118 19228 137,08 71.2
PARK MAINT, OFFICE 2 49 1 48 _ 807 192.989
{ POLICE; STATION 1 65 116 8_2,6 87.26 106,78
PUBLIC WORKS 3 34 4,87 165,68 98,25 g8~13W
RECREATION CENTER _ 1 68 2 110 38,8 35: 00a
0. H. 81 ~ 3 34 2 68 28.8 41.01W
O~ H. #2 3 34 1 _ 34 9 28,479'
0. H, 93 _ 3 34 2 68 22.6 33,099'
WASTE WATER PLANT 3 34 11.33 3$6;22 Mw254 66,944'
TREATMENTP?LANT 3 _ 34 8,6 221 1i3,2g 51.24N
WHIPOORWILL HILL PUN 3 34 1 34 18,29 '17,79°/
VALLEY RIDGE PUMP 3 34 1 34 11,76 ,!4,65
d 4 WELL SITE 3 34 216 _ J88 _ 18.6 f a6 WELL SITE 3 34 1,6 91 ~ ~i0 6 ~ 20,699'
H7 A H8 WELL SITE 3 34 0.76 26 12.6 150,00%
PALISADES PUMP ST 3~ 34 0,6 17 r~ 7,78 48,69/
COLLEGh ST, POOL i w 86 4 X220 64,33 29,249
SUN VALLEY POOL 1 55 3 1-~ 168 29,6 17.274'
TOTAL .
W✓~u~.i......tir~..n.L... , a .a MYYn WwY wl.wt': ~.w Ai:L.. .
O
•
a
•
f
TABLE 3
:i ,;~yi' I NM9 IA'N
JATOTAL ! AVOW y7gTbLr 707AL' ;
MgINT, J(~ i MYJJNG ~1~4Ut35 CUT~L HOU~i PERCENT
tab TION €:1 r,, d kI. !~f ~',L` `VE;Ev1,I jl ltJtl". lil, l tt~+ E'dlll S { I'tJ~S ;II i0M1' 4E`I'!
PM 407 3 27 297 72.09 w~ ~ T 27 37.450/
BELLAIREr SLVD, 3y ~ 27 1115 310 247A 79.84%
BRAZOS 8LVD. w ~r 3 34 1.97 68:98 27.7_5 41.439
COLLEGE PKWY, 3 34 x7.41 251.94 149 69.1401
CORPORATE DR/THRUS 3 34 3 102 36,5 3+817894
E DMONDS LN. _ 3 34 8.83 300.22 197.75 65.879'0
POX AVE. 3 34 215 85 54 63.539/a
GARDEN RIDGE BLVD 2 & 3 38 1016 399 340.5 85.344'0
MAIN ST. 3 34 _ 3 102 68.75 87.401/o
VALLEY PKWY. 2&3 38 9182 365,58 3605 98.62%
OLD ORCHARD 3 34 2,5 86 84.25 75.69%
SUMMIT ~2 46 0,5 20 19,75 85,97%
MEADOW GLEN 3 34 0.6 17 15 8812494
VALLEY RIDGE 2 48 5.26 24115 151;75 82.8A9'e
FOREST PARK 3 34 0.75 2516 6.75 25,47%
RIDG6'WAY CIRCLE µ 3 34 0,75 26.6: 9 35.2994
SAVAGE 3 34 1.5 51 14.75 2S.4210M
7RE ATWN'T PLANT RD. 4 i0 1.5 15 11 7g 78,33W~
M}LL 5*5*. 3 34 4 138 128,48 84,8544
'TOTAL 2874 291931 24 p„ 72;220/
•
t ,
1j
..+••..«la...JU....4.-J , : r.. rr w. l..1wM .~Yifi lv{. ..i. M]..' r i
A
c~
Q
i
How have other factors impacted service levels of City crowe7
ha davelopment and population have increased in Lewisville over the past five
years, so have the service demands on parka, municipal facilities and medAsn
and ROW maintenance, chart C shows how total acres have increased for waoh
type of area over that time. CHART C
PALS MOWING
ACRES
380 Ii
280 i
200 1r i Film
t 60 r ,1. .I
100 I'
80 I» L r,
0 1988.6711987.881988.64~1984.90~1990°A1~1901.42 .
fACIWTl49 5018412 68,tl0 69188 I1 69188 68.88
PARKS & ROW 8838 96,10 (101,12 tOL12 1Q4109 104,90
11816 . t4016 144.3 184,3 16411 18711
M
BUDGET YEAR
M PAM M110IANB L ROW C'PACIll114B
Chart b reflects how these increases in acreage have impacted the workload of
this division by providing a breakdown of the amount of acres maintained per
worker, CHART D
ACRES VS WORKERS
AQAA3
50 -
40 1..11, 11 11 ....,..1. u1i 1,11V.1 r, t lp 1, i1, ..1.N
, 20 1V/1 .1111111 1/11 11 V» VI11 .11 •IIV 1
t~ 111 IH f
0 as loss •6911s89.9olt990•o1l1991.02~
1986.8711981•
No. MAK9AS 8 s s 9 Lad"Id ACA9$/WORKER 21122 a117x 38.8 7 34,14 8B,9s
BU3ET YEAR
N0. WOAKkA9 ACREVINOW-n
0 0
•
r
Chart E is provided to show A month by month breakdown of, hours of mowing.
Although this activity is considered seasonal, this chart clearly ahowa that
activity Is maintained throughout the year, Weather patterns have a direct
impact on this activity, A warm winter or wetter than normal spring and
summer directly effect the activity of these crews.
CHART E
HOURS
400-,
300-~,.1 y. Y,1 V,.,a. Y., ..,\.1 \ I,J al. IVy. l
1. 1 Y 1..1 1 11 V.. Y.~,11
200-
TOO 1.. ~Y
JAN, FIS, MAACHAPAU. MAY JUNK JU4Y AUG. $NPY Oct NOM.
MONTH
/ PACItITINS W MMANS l AOW d PAAKS
•
,
t
• Q 1 ( f + 1 i, 1 1v`slj 1f r.
dl
_f
W
a
{ one usion8 and Rsc9Mwndations {
Since 1986/87 the Parka Maintenance, Division has had an increase in workload
of 113,22 Acres of parka, medians and Pacilitles, an increase of 52%. During
this same period the crews primarily responsible for mowing have added one i
worker, or an increase of 12,5%. Clearly this would suggest that these crows ,
would tend to fall behind. The data acouxulate(l over the previous eleven
months indicates that these crews are approximately 20600 hours short to
maintain these areas at the prescribed maintenance levels,
Three options are available to address this gaps
1) Reduce the maintenanco level requirements for parka, medians and
facilities, and add no now positions, By reducing the maintenance level by
one notch for each location, e ,g. an ML I becomes en ML II, approximately
1,800 hours of mowing time con be savod, Specific locationa could be furthor
reduced to make the remainder of the gap, 'Phis option requires no additional
expense, but requires the understanding that the maintenance quality now
provided will not change,
2) Assuming that crown are mowing at an adequate rate, that 1986/87
maintenance standards wore nde(piate, and that the poroontago of available time
for mowing is constant, a minimum of an additional three-men crow would be
needed to make up for the additional workload since 1986/87. (See Chart D)
1906/87 217,72 acrea 27,22 aoroa/workar
f 8 workers
1990/91 330,;, 4 ar s A 27,22 acres/wot-ker
]2,16 workers
This does not take into account for tiny futaro median development which might
include foetiliantion and herbicide programs and/or irrigation, Any
development program would increase the mnihtonance level attid therefore the
number of hours required for maintonanoa. The annual coat for a three-man crew
with equipment is approximately #69,600.
3) option 3 would be, to havo certain areas mowed on a contrast basis,
Information obtained from the contracLora at the Water's Ridge development and
at vista Ridga Mall indicate that the coot for contract mowing rar,lir, from $20
to $26 par acre for tractor mowing and $50 to $60 par aura for push mowers,
Assuming again that 1906/87 maintenance standard are adequate, a contractor
would need to maintain 86 mores of tnediati, ROW, and/or park land with city
crows maintaining the remainder, Assuming an average of 25 mowinga during the
growing season (once every ten days) the estimated coat iat
b 86 acres X 7.5 mowinga X $25 n $53,750,
A primary difference between OpLions 2 And 3 is that, with Option 3 the only
service that the
City recsivee is mowing, trash and ed
pickup Bing while under
option 2 the City has acoesa to the crow for the same wide variety of services
that the other workers are currently providing.
0
0.
r
i
` A
i
,
APPMIX A
•
R
4e
R
i
MA'XMT9 WCR G3YL+h
1. owln Schedule mowing at least once every five working days but may be
as often as once every three working days. All areas should be trimmed
and edged once a week
2. Weird contA Wood control should be practiced with 11145MA" in the Sumner
and "round up" in the Winter.
31 Fertilizer Turf should be fertilized three times per year. Trees,
shrubs end flowers should be fertilized according to their individual
requirements.
4, r do High traffic areas will be aerated six time per year,
S. rrl do Sprinkler irrigated with electric or manual valves. All
repairs will bo made as noon as possible. Check timers monthly.
6. Litter control Minimum of twice par week, _ Extremely high visitation and
aponiol activities may increase the frequency,
7. Pruning Frequency dictated primarily by species and variety of trees and
shrubs. This will usually be scheduled to coincide with low domand
periods.
a. hightiny Maintenance should preserve the original design. D&maged
systems will be repaired as soon as possible, Check timers munthly,
9. Surfaces Swooping, cloaning and washing of surfao%,s needs to be done so
that at no time does an accumulation of sand, dirt, lsavas, and grass
clippings distract Prom thu looks or safety of the area Repainting or
restaining of structures should occur when weather or wear requito.
Graffiti should be removed or painted over as soon as possible.
10, a ra Minor repairs should be done immediately upon !iiecovexy. MAjot
~f repairs ohall be reported to the supervisor for scheduling,
11. E1ogg1 an in Uultiplo plantings may be scheduled lot blooming
cycles, Maximum care of watering, fertilizing, disease control,'
disbudding and woodinq is necessary. Weeding flowaro and shrubs is don-1
a minimum of once per week, The dosiirod atandard is essentially woad
free.
12. ReeLrgrme Rost roomA will normally he cleaned at ).east once per day.
Additional service Ainy be necessary during times of high use.
13. In octiM An over all inspection of this Area should be done at .loast
weekly.
14, Special Features Fenturou such as drinking fountains, flog poles,
parking control devices, pork signs, and fences should be maintAlla d in
the highest possible order.,
MAIWU]EVLL.i_ AM$
Parks office
clity Hall
health Ugpnrtment
Fire Station 02 %
Central Firn Station
R Police atation
R
Reoreation Center
Central Park - Arts 1
looks Park Pavilion and Group Picnic Area
Ssautification Areas
Athletic Fields
r
11 owin Schedule Mowed once every 5 to 8 working days. Herbicide or soil
storilant will be used to eliminate as much tximninq as possible..
Edging will be done as regviired.
2. Waod Control Should be praoticed, budget permitting.
3. Pe tit r should be fertilized a minimum of twice per year, budget
permitting.
4, Aeration he required.
I_r i t o sprinkler irrigated with electric or manual volvae, All
repairs will be made as soon as possible. Timers will be chocked
monthly,
61 C,i tar Cont Minimum of twice per week. Extremely high visitation and
special aativities mny increase the frequency,
7. Pruning reoquency dictated primarily by species and variety of trees and
shrubs. This will usually be schedulos to coincide with low demand
porloda.
8. Lighting Maintenance should preeervo the original design. Damaged
systems will be repaired an aoon ,le possible, Timers will be checked
monthly.
9. 6 r ao o Should bn cleaned, rppaleed, repainted, or replaced as soon as
possible.
10. a air Minor repairs ahculd be done immediately upon discovery, Major
repairs shall be reported to the supervisor for scheduling
11. P_1Qke1„Uarntinaa.none.
12, eat R mg When prtoent should be sorviceo once per day,
( 1J. ne ockiQn An over all inapoction of the area should be done weekly.
Spacial keg pt Lgla Should be maintained for safety, function and high
quality appearance as per eetablishad design,
ARLA9
MAIM'i'P.N g- Mg L-11
I,aka Park Campground
Ellis Park
Crook View Park
Volley Ridge arson Halt
Irrigated Medians
College St. Pool
Sun Valley Pool
Central Park - Arad II
take Park - Govt. Rest Rooms
Tennls Courts
Play Courts
Play Grounds
Hodrivk House
MAINTENANCE LEVEL III
1. Ncwina schedule Mowed once every 6 to 10 working days. Herbicide or
soil sterilant will be used to eliminate as much trimming as possible,
Edging will be done every d to A weeks.
2. Weed Control should be praoticed, budget permitting.
3. t tilizer Areas should be fertilized once per year, budget permitting,
4, Aeratj} As required,
5. Irrigation None.
6. L 4ksr Contras Once por week on medians and twine per week in park
areas,
7. pru=ning Frogmoncy dictated primarily by apociaa and variety of trees and
shrubs, This will usually he scheduled to coinoide with low demand
periods.
91 Lighting Maintenance should preserve the original design. Damaged
systems will be repaired as soon as possible, Timers will be checked
monthly,
9, Surfaaes cleaned on a complaint basis, Repaired or replaced as budget
allows,
10. Bea ,krg Minor repairs should be done immediately upon discovery,
11, Floral Plantings None.
12. eat Rooma When present should be serviced once per day.
13. InspgatAon,An over all inspection of this area should be done weekly.
f 14. peoial Features Should be maintained for safety, function and high
quality appearance as per established design,
MIAZ_HTL+NANCR LE L III ARPJIs
Non-irrigated Medians
Non-irrigated high use park areas
North End - souLh End of Raldon Park
West End Highlands Park
Front Half of Collage street Park
Iris Ln. Park
Picnic Areas at L.L. Woods Park
Sycamore Park
Lake Park - Hobie Point
Gall Board Point
Picnic Areas
s
WNTMWCe LEM rv
1. 421i1 7 Odule Low frequency, Height not to exceed a mexiwum of Nix
Inches
2, Heed_contkol"None,
3. art lie None,
4, WA Lim None,
5, Irrigation None,
6. Litter Control Once per week or lees, Complaints may increase level
above one servicing,
7. kruninc No regular trimming, Safety or damage from weather may dictate
actual work schedule,
S. L7. tin Replacement on ocmplaint or employee discovery,
0. urf ass Replaced or repaired when safety is a concern and when budget
permits,
10. Weirs should be done when safety or function to in question,
11, floral Plantings None,
12. Rest Rooms None,
13. Inspection A minimum of once per month,
ld, eoial features Minimum maintenance to allow safe use.
MAXNTKNANCB I&M-
Open Park areas at L,L, Woods Park
Far North end of paldan
Ear south and of Naldon
Middle Section of Raldon
East sido of Highlands
Book Side of College St.
tlreen Belt at crook view
Numerous Areas at links Park
M
..-.a.....w. , .•.wonw...u,. wur.rrlwi~irit:Ya'. Y.. u m •
,
%
ti s tt i rss*II
l..
W
r
n `r;% idl Ott
M/1INrENANCE I VI
owi Sphedule Not hiowed. A fire break may be mowed on a complaint
basis.
2, ?e@43 -ontrol None,
3r Ferti iz r None.
4, erat on None,
5• rri atio None,
6. S War co ro On demand or complaint basis,
P_runi( None unless safety In involved.
84 i tin Normally none. keplaosmant on control basis,
9. Bur aaos services when safety is consideration.
10, Be pairs Should be done when safs* or funation is in question.
11, FE.oral plantings Nona.
12, Wet room None.
13. Tneoeotions Quartarly,
14, Spacial Features None,
t
i A ~ f • ,
1,~-rte n...Y.. ~ • .r. rw..M-wrw alGSq:l1.1 .1 Nkv r : \i ~
n.
min
,p
r
,1 r
I.
k1l
1,11Y (IF D TON
!I
rhf•".h11~iiAr`Jf11Jh1
C1; I.I rlytl V. riFarr 01 .1 , laity hin nclrlr'
filr:14 Nvt4)11o, Dol)lll:y City MantlU(ar
1
1=Iti7FC CatImrinr, r;. 'ft,eci4, Adn)inl~t:r'akive Azi trai:wlk
1) rVIV, OWJLL~lt 2, 1gg(:)
;9rJB,7k'l;'1'[ L'i ti tsi {'rryl^ r.pm~ari csr~rl
i
fhl f011,~7p1in1~ la a tiB1: L1'I Gii~it~IS CO rumpewo sey-',rtcrn1~arid t-c3r,
10i tl) atllter c 1 f i t1 _ . f''1 r ca: h 0104 4L1fe ninny rty YOU 01-Ant mo S.c ~nmr~er~
f,u I)cn1un Or Add ly Ilthl ttr 4..
Not ,I
.Itr 1 I f.._.
aCf Ir rl?l 1. lion I
001 /ot,.lje~
nil V~(51-~1
40yooo
f erlnrvr° rs Cq .v u: l1
000
LEI7rU~l'I 4
Gr alnrl F r';ll r't l" 100 34.1
lur !~;f l t
Ir of
{/VA 15c 554l,l(y
4 { I rvJi r;;v'i 11 rz rF s~ h`(i
c t~ rlclirihray 1;'.450f)
f • r~fi`Ei SlUtl: f!. 162a ;sic .1
Not, th {.1 r,ll ] <Ilx'1 rdi 1 1 ss 4n1 500
l") Ar,cl ~f.l. 01W cl 1 s.Fly ,C)c
fh
rri'iG~x gun 7ti,707 (ckgta_ ✓ }
•!`1~ FA
bbl IF rle
S 107, ooo
D lyI- t11Vr1 !)1rFIi36
E'Ir.;.uiinrirrt. 1 l 7p 'J,h'➢
X Eli Ya)Ir & yC)).)o
G.? Unl vtl0Urm [,11 `7u" it r
cJJ`}.''7- , T' !.1.11'1111 t.1 all
11 +000
Ih
iy~(~~~%,1 fI1.1+l t. nVl, llt, 0
it:...
SSrrft~-
* a t ti n r. 1~ t ~ { f'
1.
r
I
1.
r
L ar(l10 144r C1Q0
t_tan47mgnt 7 , f 0o
I_ubbnet: 191 .
P}cral l en , 4l) "
Mf dl rand aL3r on
Cdr 100 o 244
r;a .1.1)Co 20o
C'li!ii~tlrn4~ 110 (ipo
POLUtci ROO< ;i?p(rp(r
Sarl (1ncjgj o Sif3, qo0
San Marrrtm l4, 490
Temp 1 EG, c,pu
X Ty I Fir Waco r i SH 100
Wir.hi`ra Fa 1.1r 106 A 00
99,040
•
: 0 1 ,i. f _ r♦f Y c t 11 iy tereYl it ard)1j 1~}~ly
•
w
0
v.
X NF'0(~I'1AI T 1?N.,!_1Nn,_s~A7U 3_Ftfrt'Q[t1:
June 1940
Denton experienred substantial grawth in the OW's. Dontim is
atiuut to break into the tip fir must populated citrec, in the
motroplex. In 19r3fr, the city had 4000063 raeldmnt omi 1gg0
proJum-tions indicatri 70,250 rosident6. The land arc ,,a inc.rr~,zsud
from 32.Z, sgr.carv miles to 61 sguaro miles. At the s fw-~ t1,mr° that
the Cit•y'$ population has arrplucled by 46% and land area grew 68%0
ei ty sr3rvi cres have i ncrcaasod to ar.eamodato thong new ro6i dente
with (-113clr.1city, water, sower-nr r.tr4 hots, parks. and uthr)r rity
e,ervIcee;.
Nuw facilitIus for Don Lon cltixons indludu tho Martin Luthor King
Rocreatiori Cc?nt.sr, Animal Control Canter expansion, and Beninr'
Comer expansion. Athloti,c fitolds havc4 alna boon welded cot Denim
far k. Now racarvire$3 1 n1-1ude Envi ronmont A 1 1Aealth, cade
fnforromollt, TreaZury, and ilperatIuns Anatysi p, Community
Drtvolopment Nlor.k grant, and Urban Main Strout Program.
T1lr0ughs,ut th.tK period of rapid growth, the (.ity'm Workforce has
rumainur) at about the 61111r level. In 1901, than Clty had 12.0
employmca prnr 1000 citia!wis and in 1990 thorn ar•n 13 ompluyess
per 1000 citizens. Those empIoyc4ot ore providing mura servi.cea
to mire peaoplo. Thrp calf for L-'inorgeilcy Mgdical Sol-vice (EMS)
i1luStrAt0% glair, point. In 19131 thoro were 031 FMQ calks for
survico, and in 1901? there wero ,3167 calls.
• Also during the past ten yearsr thra City Itasa had to ari%LIMe
aisnignment6 which worst vi thtrr former1V pme,4ormnd by thage
agranrIon or have boon mandnEnd to vo. Theda new servi,cao have
twom rva3signed to c:itios'lvithottt any additional funding. Tho
inr-ra<ised emphasis un protecting the environment h-m bu*n passood
from the fudoral and stag 1ev*1 down to the local ln!vel. ("I base
aro paying For- thnso environmontai concorns. Some of theso
• include: •
1. Mow Farm to Mar-k;at: rittht of waym in t.ho City;
2. AM6ume patrol and Ir1yo st:igatIon fur
intrdrtitaty highwayu in thn. Cityt
3, l of i d Wautm Management 1) 1 all 13 requl rod,
inclucling as>;strrance that evroryone rtsroives
sanitatinn nerviest
4. IJr-w restrictionai on how landfills are built
• b
J
`r
•
•
and operatsd;
5. Landfill C1106LIrD regarirr?mtants witty a minimum
of N yriar•s arid ruly moon go up to th Aofara;
6. E:f A r.eUL-II A : i nnu on quality ttf rlnrm or
rrrnr~ff4 may r?vent:uFllly hAVO to cApturra and
treat storm wateri
7. Detention panda r'equir'tad an dr,tain vrrays
H. fPA and ToNaz Water Commitswiart reyuiroments
On 1-117clergrnund tYtoragm tanktsl monitor for
Ieakage thin yua)r and rfilmed iati on i f ler.kageI
roplam? tankia within nest 5-•0 yearrd;
9. 5afo Dr. inking Water Ar_t of 1906 has had
cai.rntIt*4% r?ffect.s nn water treatment Arid
dit5t:ribUtion;
10. Clean Water Act of 1907 Mats had hugre inl)ACt
nn wastowator treAtmoot;
11. f'NA rOgt.rl at I ohs requi ri ng that eri l
capacltators And tranoformers with PCIr's
(pnlyr.hiorcAfOd biphenyl, a carcinoilgri) be
I- nMLIVPdI spend AFJPrMJmAt:ely t100,000 all
transformhrs thim yLuAr;
12. AdditionAl ropdrting on fuels and local growth
in the elartric dvpartirrrtntl
1;% Rotnavgl of asbastns casts approrrim atraly
`G10c rJO0 per yaAr l
14. Arid rain logis;laation ilnpaCtB nor e:aal•-.fired
electric p1Ant.1` ,
1y tfazartJoras waste disrpossali
16. 0trit:t. enforcomrant of indiistrital 1) r-fit, _
tr-e41tmulIt
01: th" 17amu time ritIvin ware for, cod t.o aestunr7 t11ears new
ragp0nrylt10fs, r_1iea 611 wci lout fodor aI revvmi,m sharing in
19-76-t37. 'fhra loss of 4oderal rovome rorjr
subtILAntial dr-.crsacap to city funrla. In=ta 1ari9L1ng 6P tsants! A
r t?r. eived ViH7,f)oo. Rovuritiv sharing came rthout tiipmclflc
roquir'emont,s sand comId bit used nn almnet Any opr.,ratinU anti
• cap.itAl u:optatlsW. This; trans I at:eci into all offf two or three cents
of the ta>r ratoo in tarms of reveal-lo 10iiL. Te:ias rbariku behind
only FlnridA Jn graanLm recelved for' gtAte sand 1nCtll gavernrnents.
And foderal dnllAr's avaf IAble for local governmonts t;nnkinura t;n
dwindlQ.
During all the evontts of the 1980'!r, the City's ta)I rlato hag
• rrmAlhpd it a r-Watively stablc? rnty. Phis is espt;+I.Aally, taut: •
whert comparing thra City of Donton to Denton County and Drantcan
Irttiepondont School Uisstrdrt. Ira than Inst two y0arel, psnElah
Cut~rtty'ts tA) rate increased anti 6.7/.; the Uranton Indopendent
13r.huol Uf otrlct tact rata incru,imod 7.~~'Y , and 2q%1 and th" , City 01
Dontola did not roi$30 its tan rata 1n 1989 slid had only a 4/
increase.. in 1990, Theo City ham hold 1:11 (Y lints durtng this
rJlfficulL oconornir., poriod of the late 001%.
1 r
l
S
9
Poop le froquizintly compare the cities of Denton arld Carrollton.
Thera i r. a torso ko Lhi is quec;tf nri that csi.rygasta that ,ithaugh our
ratio!; art.-4 about the unmd size, Carrollton provi dilt3 HILW O uorvi cdca
with fewer, empinyoes. I asked the %tiff to rr.soarc:h thki.
Ovorall, Denton comparws vary favoratbly to CarrolILon. Her•gss
What wci fuund;
r'upulat iUri 70,256 00100.
Square Milos 61 .0 3`3 -
Street.miless 'WO 3x17.5 ,
,i Electric 27,147 cust:ompre, private utility rompany
k Water 3.7t! pill. gal/yr no wator treatment: plant
294 milez of piper 356 miI" of pier
wastowaterr 3,14 bill.. gal/yr no treatment plans:
321 miles of lines ~t46 mikes of lints;
Parku 16 t5
321 mcres 900 acrrar3 "
Roc rvAtIon roc CSnters 2 poolkr
BotO or Center ttol f course
4 at:hlotic ccnmploueu
r3. Library 8,O04 tUy circulation 321266 Pt}zy r.irc:ulation''
PLA i re 132 164
fire 119 114 ,
4 utations h utatirnntt
1 undor construction
a 'Total E;m1s l uyev"3 t 1377 0,0
r` , ~ 11
With Only Alt mcrr'N empinyeeg AcintOn provideq these? serviccas Chet
CarrulIfnn dor-sn"tt
Municiptilly ownrud elgCtr•ir.: utility
Mufsl6pall,y owned and opor•ateel landfill
hfunicipally unod and oprr,ated water tr•etitment plank
t'Iimilcip, lly owned and operated waatewatt9r tro."itrnrant pi ant
Cclrnmiinity DNVelapmcnt talrirk Sr•ttnt programs for low end modorpto
Y S . rl I` 17 111 i' t :R..
a z.. r I
~F
I
Income ci.tl2ena
MkiriicipEil Airport i
Ur bon Main Street pradr,arn Pane of only 7 in country) i
It is al%u critical to ramemboe, that Denton's tam baare ix
sr.ibstantially ]teas than rurrc~lltgn'n bocau%L, of the largo e.mount
of tLk s; w>ermpt prnporty In Denton. Pralimimzlrry fluurim from -thu
two appralual districts valLIG CewralItcm tamable proprirty at
elucsra to *5 billton compa?,od to penton's% tiiErublo propwrt:y value
about $2 billlnn. Carrollton has mark than Lwice the tax l,),qse of
Denton.
Thia Is how your tai dollar% aro being zpont. 'T'his includoB Only
the general fund pnrtinn r.,f the City's >:rpehding. At ii% impori•.nrrt
tct rcirnnmh)3r 'that athrtr siE+rvicer s~ich As Lltilitive;r ganitdt.tgh,
mend recraa,tian jar*grarnm are funded by.usur feeN.
I
r
t
o
n,.r...--'~wn.~eA, i„ ♦ w... w.hgeAi.. ~ i - i,` fl , , ~ iE ~
1
~ti4 itit ~+f~ „rr~ty~ i, t7 ~ rs~' I ~9P'k ~4~~14 r
t S1 t1
1 4'
yy l Ji
Fc_cblfc 6afr31;Y 80"/, 1L1S.49
C4rrnecx~tl Otiver nma+nt 15% 93,92
Public Works 14% 06.36
Pae'k a '.u f4errti,iti ncl 8% 49. Afc
L,1 hr io(ry 3% 17. „
Building Op}~r•ationq 7,'/. 17.7.u
FinanC0 ~2% .17.21i
CLAStoMer,
13~r vi re % 1 t4
IF. no
far~r s nnncxl 1," % 9.11IF3
hkinit #p~l ! ntcwt 1%
7b
Loyal 1% 5.713
he})t, iJarviela 19B 9
Gapi Lail OJIL•1'•ty V. 12,37
$610.3o
M
NDtrat t% ruLmrling urror ($6. AM
HOUSE? vr#lLigcl at s.10c),(i4(c with no exemptiun+
• 7ci t r ~tl~ a-F .'Fil£l t 0
F'Y 19136 &Ir,tur+l
• j. x. 4N 11 :~rd4 ~J,Y([Lai' i I l Ya.tl
.p I
1 1: ~
11 t
I
S
pnntun ,
to s3hl~t; surorithvc~r•y rmci Ung AnrJ
1 i l:t?
wi YOU s1jme n4 i nncrvatia
har r+ iftrr
daing, progrrtnrss. % would
prngr•rsysi ve ihi nrJrs khnt are
Q~__!"if3~lm+4.r11.t,Y..-{~C:3~ra._kH~_Fa~~.J~~ p!J
I• lZION"tivtr
r e, .
, pgllcra flrr)gr'ami under Police t,,hipf hiic:hl
Cpmmrutity L7r'i6+htftd f' nal
hIUd41 t gJicJn
4, hr•r trghntit "0 rMintl- Program
Clitizv inpl.tL and
tslghbaj rhrrnd to
n p rticipafanrt sct.lve
cgnttt
Esk,131 f srh final a ranrJ'n%
nNi1hbnrlhr•+gd prforfties for their
b. Artign plan fur• JtArticultrr
ne# ~hbgr
Tn '11crUCl t, of f i r ql s i s dc~vel UpgrJ f rtr tltc
CC1F Y thee rri,lzetn~ cthd thr~'J7ciliclr
EJ, q pr'nACtiVR9 prlav6rrrtrs
E3ntlth, t~azt Dcrltrnr crime
r' 'u?RP+idIng I:u all ,MrIrat3 of r.ity sagn
Pn21rr; I)Upartrnarrt 'dJcrn i ,W1 arnurld
GrrittntAtiUr UU, c(ygrnn,lnity
estr`19ot1s gt~tn hffice+rts'aut of
f0, IhtUnssJvtr kr•raihJhq to ~r~E, uffir:ta and onto
to bargm~~ inMnvativt~ f pare pRd lenrattrACJL, thiam
"eve" of 0101 prablrams ?ivOra at
l 1. A11 r)rgtini ak f nn all
the rrlpt;atlnn OX17,o t nrtnr 11avu been
tither 1:1110 FsI tlirrrt.lgh
1•fJa l Ineli tuts puma 'a d s
k~gctloostern
t
MSnAgc ll"
hUts 80LlLIIairn pt)Iirt0 lnssiftuto, f0inl
La eutr~na+tte, r nl~
,ow hp
Ftunquil L13wfs,Ye gu119 through th,isa tr"Aihing,
04f'jCr3r•s i~ f'r'a0sticlrant of the Fol"OrlSica
I'.;. E argahirt~Liuh,
mrargrrnl:Y 9I1
nn lfhra in City bogirming August ip
I' Eire, Chief Jghn Lr~ak mnHt~rnizr~d elc~
l)*cislnit making and
J dveI s pArtment
ciccuunkefbiiit:y At U etAtian
Inwslrr'vicU innp~ctiana gf bus3lnassta0H
}ir's0t inspcrrtirah frr+r fRrt~rfnrmr.. (for 2
Year) H 4SOO I amt.
4. )
tl If have vl (tl at l nna rA-Ji napsrt and charge Asst
dl)graded firm tg( ui sUMMt and vrr
5, r1re provent.icrrt hirlp~
b• Fciblfc ihfU+'matic,rl nnrJ eaciutM.itntal prggr~~hr 10
ut i 1 i z i rtg a vail that Wets dohati~d
7, E'margtrnry Moclic;all to 5arvir:rod rgr:tin~rathe r.ity
Dontun 1
a to pr'nvldr,
srtrving J)rntur'rtrnu~ltstariding mirgr•Vzl:
g• FfrN Station 11,5 Cic:t,Yl yflldnrt+ts. 418 wa'il cars
I)nrtr,i e Eiroo at Wf ndssctr
i
1 141
r
i
''11 1
1
, r
I
t
i
0
Dont.un has some very miciLing and innovato programs;. I would
lilce to sahar?a with YOU tiame of the prncJY•psgiVa thingss t:hAt Wt.- are
tlgins~, ~
1, innovative pn11ca vr•agr'arns undror Policy? Chief Michael
17ez
2. Camrhunity Oritantpd Policing program
S. Model throughout thte Country
4. Citizern input and participation to aolve
npighborhood conrvrma
`.i Est:ablissh goale and prior•itios for the,r pirticularr,
neighborhood
6. Action plan for uffirors is developed for the
nr'ighbor•haod by HE? r.itizeris and the palfara
7. Otll"% prwnrtive, pr"vantn Crime
51. Xn E3outhoamt• Denton, oxpanding to all arvAn of city saor7
d. Policy Dwpartmunt rrorgani ed around community
arlwit tion3 got% officurra out of office and onto
stramtq
16. IntcntOw., trairlintf to prspare and eincourayr them
try bocomo ionovativEe problems psulvoru iA all
level% of tho oroanl-at16n
ii. All t•ho c,aptaine imcept arty= have boon throi.rgli
elt:her tha VDI prngr om,' the Snuthwcasterm
Legal Institute CommAnd Management Ochoolr ur
thra E30Ltthern Pril i tiei lrrsttI Wtta. Now the
Lir,utersants oro goinry thm.ryh this trainincf.
f2t.rtsull Lewis its r'rmsident of the Forensics
Officcr•s arganiiraiions
11. Lmergonry 911 on line in City btaginhing Ar.lgasat icy
• 1s ~._>W l L fi.. Qs'1' M h (M
1. Firu Chief John Cook modwroized dppert.rneri
2. tter_ision rnat;ing and arcountability aL the ratat',icn
I oval K
3. In--vurvic:u ineperttnnu of bkmirluisveg (for 7. ydaru)
a. First in,sprr:tinn frtm (nrerfar plod 4504 lamt
year-) ` 0 .
b. If htave violatione ro-snapeput mid charge
n/ 4. Upgraded firo equipenivn't .arid vohiclea
5. fire prevention
b. PLiblic information tanrl Pducetionml programs
utilizing i van that was donkod to the city
7. Eimergency Modicul 5mrvicwei continue tD provide
Dontr.,n citizenu oi.rttstanding ssrvir;-* me well as
sser'vtrrrl Denton County ra%idemts.
B. Fire Mati on tt5 Oct. 1990 - PrIlInt o Vrae at 6Ji nds c+r
I
I
I
I
I
i
9• H re station #b Li lllstn M!liar mrtd Teasley late 1991
ts__t~fa~?t~t~:~.f~N~tfgp 'J
1. ICe015 Nm(3rtr.8 PUALItift.tl akvard
Esc?rutificptir~n Gmmaligj3tC)n two Cif
'PvOntm with over 1000 par•ticipantzs y w1rJe claan ~.tp
Cmphpssia on beautifying enf:rancewayu
a. 8AR)n ordinanCe
b. Landscape ordfnancre, includeu trop
prtmervation
r.. Moths) landssr.aping - University, Dallas
Drive katatu and city money)
d. St-trying, utility 11 nus
1. Regan program for Immspapera 1991)
2. F tpetltd rJ to glass afid xluminLtm
3. Over 691 tons recycled In tom laot year
4. EduCational programs with D151)
u. 9rnnt money froth DTF for gr.gdes k-b to f6tudy;
onvirmnmanfal irss3ms
6. Form,tlating pilot progra+n for c_trbs4ld* recycltng
newtspapnrss, g1.1as, aluminuMp platetiCZ;, and tin.
1. Ono of only two citaet, in nation wl1:h ail officially
rtacognizod Urbin Mein Kroot progr•aim
2. Racognizad by the Tt-maia Histor•ic;c?l CnmmiEssitio
3. 9i lWa lartctary 19900 VM 2, OOO of rei nvErr#trhwnt
4. Two pasftinrino ona City fundssl one private funds
3. Public-•privata part:nelrtzh.fp bennfftts ertfre COMMUnity
O
1. MHJgr Thoroughfares
kadrtm Spencer 1'ia in
Lillian Miller
TeAmley I_rtne •
/Y 0011
bormi sy Arne
Addition,ql Turn lanes
2. r~nrk and Rvrr+e Linn cs4ntore
Martian Luther king Rwt-,raation renter
complotod Fob. 1989
b. Sgniur Canter e4pahsaion completed -
(jadiCaterj May 151?6
C. Donis Park Almost Complete csoft•ball
•
e
Ftel.ds)
d. F'vor•is PArif wor•i; will b[sgin lator thisf
summer
Drainage (aver $V millinr7)
a. Racent: rain9 avid minimum flaoding
4. Tr'a'ffic Si gnalr;
a. lncraase,in traffic signs from 330(i
in 19136 to 7000 in 1990
u, Upr,)rrading traffic signals - ;73 mince 1907
c. Elynr.hrhnlr.Atihn, closed loop fsystrsfhB
'n 11 nrzar feet
d, Cnrroll and 'University completes fiowntawn
EquAre3 snap
c~~.<8~s~!3R~l.x ~jt~.S?tl~~r~~.gct.~
Loop 2f3(3/3130
Bhurman/Wisidsor
Mined Loop
Carroll/MUIberry
b. Animal Control Facility L4pansiarr-
6. 131ghway prmjurt - Mauvch Hrenr:h bridge complote
CY
The City has Implemented a mission:statomunt and department Al
ac tIum plane to implailion: the philosophy. The City saw the nowd
for an arganizLit ionaI visian to crents a Ulstamer` morvica
appr•nnch And pramnte flurailty servlcrg. A City image commltl,ne
worked with depar•tmein (:u 1:o devalop the mlogsn "Dedicated to
(JUality ServIco.11 Each department took the mlogan and dovalaped
work plans to imploment goAtlity mservica In each work Lunn.
Therafor°es mirssiaru mtatement is department specifir.. and Each
an0luyen khowy what "DPdirAtNd to Duality bar-Vire" m0ana in
hi-;hgr daily work.
•
1. Tars raui:e hAs remained stable
2. 1906 .5900
19137 .[5900
1900 , 5219
• 199r.: .6183
1 E:1 E~Ctr1C
a. OVer 200800 CLl£'tnmhlrs
b. rr?kau Municipal Power Pool
c. Avorage r•asponme time 11 minuNs
d. Rest dents Al r*atom ()*mu down every year since 19136
.M.lnn.rAr .mow»Ir..rs M. r . r ~ , i • "
.u W.iN ~1 tYY'i 3 . w \I I.
I
Now
r r
((*xcept 1913CI wher) ther-ca was no change)
fur an avurage dei_reaw? of 4% tamc:h year;
commurr.IAl rat raa have dot.reasied an
avorage of 8% each year
e. Charging cost of eervire based on dmiancl
1, Wator
a. Water uaurcras I.ako Lowisvillus Lake Flay RobwrtEr
b. Now water treatment p1.Ynt necir L.Akcs Ray Roberto.
Wastewater
a. Empandod treatment plant in 191390 4000 million
gallons antsal1y
b. Plant meets EPA And Tcpxau Wester Commission reges
c. Trs?Ated wasatowator rleamer when it Ieavera
ths; plant then rnw water frcxn Lake Ray
Roberts.
I. More circulation than 'rWLJ cir• LINT
71.. Twentieth year of the annui,kI book reviow serias
Childran'sa progrmnm7, Jsuppet sllowKr A h0114140rlt
progr.mr A ganraology r.laiis, and a llterncy program
that trI,1ins volunt:uoru by Lanch adultu how to r*ad,
PuppLit nhows also aid In t:rr7ching i;hi l dren.
4. butrench program al5so provitirm bookm for rhockout
at the Martin Luther hang rYwcrantinn rvntor.
Wu can ses how well our "DRdir.ated to 0.1-10lity Sarvice" program is
doing by lpoking of the awmrds our City programs, h1vv rr?c.saivcpd.
Flew are A sample of %omo of thoue mArd-winning progrnrne And
sect vi r.ost
i A. Finanr.e; Di,~4_ingF}i,~~igfl:.~~61r~411~1'...~'CLtg~Ll1;~~1C1{I_.Q~SIC.(i
every yaar f(3r tho IAist ; budget years
(beginning in F'Y 06-07). In orOur tr3 rurni'vp
L171s award from Flaver.ymcint Fihrahiir~ flffir.nrs
Ammoriatiun Denton"s budget mat Ulm criteria
c)f bEring m poliry dnc:umcrnt, an opt;rations
guider A finanr.ial Pismo and A ce)mrhErnitwAkinn
e devicu. ---f.;
pt i •
E~5.E'~1€rn~~_L)..Cttf3U5~p,~..._Ci~Cfitlg every Viper
for last 3 years (beginning in. FY 86-07).
This; award also from (3FOA signifiou Achioving
tho higheot A+,mndw.dar in - govsarnmomt
aecourit.ing and financial reporting.
D. Keep Amorica faeauti4ul: 1224!
5k!il'Yt'L0~'q$...HY1?1 gI This etwmrd rurnghlm; a
r.ommunity tbA{: hail done An nutotandincj Job in
i d . .
r
. I
•
i
Clviring up And becaut:ifying the rity, With
this award came a X1007000 grant from the
State Dupt. of Highway and pub Iic
Tr•ansportaation.
C. Parks & Rocromtion: QQkq-.. Rtp.i_..AYi6CIj T!ria:
nat ionA.l award iuu givon for comprrnhenrnive
prograammi'ng and irinov.ative manaag"mont,
13E&IGSL_fiESC!~S 19t2 6l4?C11 - 'rhiw award is fGr
programming oxt-ollence for disablod Citizens,
Tha r:ity hos threo recrrratian centers, four
athletic r.amploves, 20 pants with 542 acrue
ref developed part; land.
lf. l~ClldD..Aftl rl'CE!?k---Erc~grdpF Ddnton wnn the fir9t
Urban Main Street Program in tho nation. it
isa officially rotngni~,ed by th* uxA0
Fii alor ical Commission.
r. nei `tg!_..a gar t_ i.ml_._Arad_A8LUteo-ALI U
E.kLuk~..a~±?r~!rf.~~, »4lci+~a~~._iuix This
uiyni -fiea that Dent on °s want'eviat.aar treatment
plant. vias boot in thug mtato for ii:m WzD.
The award in givon by tho Texan Water '
Cammi ssi nfa.
r. poAtCu>e
Lt1ClQv4tf e C'CRUCE7?a~flU Thus award was givon
to tho dopartmotit for tho Community Driantod
Policing proUram,
VII.r. fr'.IIAI_hE.hIC3lii...F{~~i..T~.{~_FtaT~hG
• With thu downturn in thH North Texan economy, the City hos many
chailenges in tfap future.
1. Preliminary figurou from DCAD property values down
• arubstantially from last year • •
2. Loms of revenue from property taxea of. more thane
$9007 000
a. Dthvr rovoriue sburcos remain flni:
h. CUt programs or* incretuto taxi~q to provide saama
%orvicos
5. Looking to the r.itfv.ons a{ Denton to provide
r:ritii_al input during thirb planning wand bUdgetirry
prnc:est~
• e .1 4 ,
, rl
•
a ,
S. 1966 bond issue baadd all [WoJe(Aud 0% growth
2. Has not maintained theft level of growth
3. In Order to save money tha city may delay
consutrGiction of major buildings Uhrsry,
recreation centers, Law Enforcement Center
4. ProJectsa to be built ooxt year:
a. Fire Station tM
b. Dik/ftickory
c. Nottingham (300 to Mingo)
State Highway projor.ts
~a. Loop AM almost camhlwLe-
b. Fort Worth Drive to bra let in 1992
C. Tc asl oy Lana January 1941
C. __._.ILf1L~..v_~t ivt?...~34116S.S y4_s,
1. City will continue to provide quality sorvices but,
must lit, more innovative in creating same rPRUlt's
2. F'xample: Fire Departmont
Nved very axponmive equipinsnt to fight fires
in some of Dent onIs taller struct:are?s.
Solution: Mere stringent sprinkler
regulat Ian s to prevent firosf different
egmi prnent, Mare comt Qf f ectS vo With same f
not better results
P..._ rY'f?~Lm~Uta..~?f _Di;yf~m~dt~r
1. UTA rorlulmtionm
2. Drainage utility
. ~ G'.__8i;r-uLrt..C1D3f2~€;I1Hf7tt?
t. bne of the City Council', h.ighpat priorities
2. City IF-, committod to ep pond the of.reet maintenanc~-
i programs ag .3oon as funding will allow
i a.._.Cpr1tiguk to k?.e_.ti_pr'=?1~..1nr 4?JAxrt[?fl1APH
1. Continua to work with Food Lion soil problems
2. CompoUng With F'urt Worth far MaLsushital Denton
haH bor_ome a big leaiguO 1318YOr iri the Jame ofi
• rconomic dpvelopmenl. •
3. Location means we havo growth (what kind?)
4. C.tt:yl% primary Job is to provide quality C?',
set-virus and help create n pluAaing environment so
the typo of rompAnleg which want to be in I quality
placo will Coma to Denton
,.n.a.«~.... .:-....W.... +M.. ~ ..n W..i. u...a Jk61uSa' . ~ .iZYY'
{ t i
~ r it c
l it 'ki ~ t a I r
r
r ~ rs i
„ r
,
' I
1z r r
9.
A. Community pragreus in the past
5. With everyone working toriethur Denton has b vor/ bright
4ALtrt~i
t
i
f,
r Y:
.i f
irI I r i .
f
r
.
QUIP !AND !NQ_L,FePget'3, Ie
A. F1oY_f_UmCLe ls. city..NpCc~yt C
Texas City flatagsatoerst Arsor.JatIor, FthiCs
Comma ttuo; Past V1 rp- Pr•assi dent of
IIntornational City Management Assorlation
Texan Public Pnwer AssaoC.latian 1909 Industry
Achievement Awards On 13card or Directors of: ,
Texas MunIt:IpaI Leayue, Tax aI Municipal
!Jtilitleg Assbr.iatloni American Public Fovrar•
Assssoci ation, Lipper Trinity Regional Water
Agency, as well as affires an r:!ther' state
hnerdr,, Snon to bo President of Amer iran
I'lubl i c Power' Asmoc i at i on
c. - Phn..4 entr, _ i.re~5t (Rf.
rare Academy Advipary Committee for- the North
Central TF'XAm Co?,rnrIl of Ciovernmeni:tn; Texas3
MUnit-iPrai League L_rauislative Task Irorca,
Pr r!s11dent of J:he bontan County sire Chiefs
Ayr. cLlation, TcniAB Piro Chiefs Assoc Iat Ion
chair of Legi sl aat i ve Committee fra(ll,kChbiQE#s.._.F>!_cL!tiv_e_birg141w_b!_.. 4'X?C!L?~Uf1 ~11L
d~'vgl gpmp[}~
Trmas3uret, of City PlArmer•s AssociatJon of
I'Lux as
E.!ella_prCe WP.iraec~r _c3f.,I,i~C;BL.Y
Toxas5 MunJCip.al LPAguo boarll of biructore
carol W*11er and Erin Luca, Duality Search
Awardmi MFrrtha ErJmilndson, Chair of Chi)dron's
ROUnd TO":11e far Taxets Libratry Aesncimtioni
!y Linda Touraini ntamud Cortiftod Vol!untoor of
America by Epsilon Sigma! Alpha InternationAl
p• -7LrL~.,Sfl~?iti:._f_'lsrcflycii4lt]~Aill?Clt
rredJdent of tho National Purchauiny
InsHtutoo Vi Co Pr•osiclont of bistric:t 12 of
the National Amoccidltion of Purchasing
Managers
N O
r r,
1•r ~ r" J r r 1 . ..Y
d
1
r
, •.~)l~l r~. ~ JJ_'f/ f--~ f I: `QIrI JI^%~L _ 'I fl Y.rt:Jir :'•t~L~S. P'F~~e°' i~) 1
~ ~ r U rr t
VIII ) ` l
;t
E
l_
. r
1 ,
r- ~ E
19
7e _ i
20
'
11-c 1
~
25
20
21
lie
r, 1
12
12
11 1 r
a~ - _ - - - 4 _ - - J_ f - i {
35 .
I _ +
_ 1 l
. , 96
- - - - - -
90
1
nu Nk¢l fAMNNV eflet ¢~uN 4_ , r . !
A w,~c
vAOt p, u s
a..s....,.~a. ...lw.....,~... , ~ .w..N «W,11,iJY41::m wi rur .
,
\I
-1 1
° 1 etI I H i" I : t S.
2
, I•
•
I s
:
1 , 7 f. IL_ r 4
rL f Ir t r+rr t
lJ~ iYLtChb)/( ~A /e~~°n~
I _G e tf'1 J,1 ~ ~ 1
4 if~t~ r'~/!~![,,rffr)f4T'~. A/)
8 l..kJ~~7~~11)(j~.. !r /'r)"z'.. of1 ~ ~.r ~ `F ~ - i-~ -1 i-. ` ~_I•._.~5
II f>t/~L4~~QIr7)rrl ~~gfflr,f! ,rrf~,` ~i ry~~t ~~..f_ ~ {t__ ~-_..II ( _t_~ i.~_~ !f 1
Ik I I IO
~Jj_
III ' 1 ~ E 1.. _
; I fJ+
I
12 . I. 'f
I11 hh
14
i
.41
{ 1 I 1
+ I r
21' f 1 ao
t1 f 11 1
I - li
21
24
32
99
L I
I~ r
30
S9
: I I
1 ,(f Art ~lL C~ J A:~li,l l~li!r J.
f._!/?ci~(„f~I _~._✓~[r(ry;.~C Jf•~~'eSL `./_~l)i.(//,~/L5//F/r' ~7C n
i•_--_ ,l._... __.f~_ r~ 1~/Ir~C`/~j lh..._ t i !u//,a/~ tlC•isTrD.`dt~- /,f F.- ,
r_
tv
4-1
14
I-
1s
I ~r .I
to
2J f,... I_ _ 4t
_
tLa4111
ff
JO i
1~ f t
1JJ
f
i
ji 31
1s~~
40
~ ~ _ ~ ~ it ~ " •~-i__ f °o
II I I
MAOlt p 6 A
r. u.-_..._. r-I~4...W ~ r ~ r• .w ~~.wNl •uis%31~.• n •w l✓•. ~
® y
t i
r.
3 _
`11•' 1_ _ •~!~If'~ in I III~~glll[ A~ q 7 -
90 -
1 1
• fff I
.1.I ~ r 1
_ _i
eo?
I
17 1 - 3
14
i a
IA
,11• _41- - ! t F is
If'
I
f ~ a fl }0
M
L _7
y
~r
h }6
1
19 - 1
oil
1a {I -
29
I IJ,
}i
I
E
e
11r _ , 79
--71
{A
Q
WK I ON IOn[ 9<1 VFA W -_07801 o 0 a k N ~_•-,.`n. ....~wna-...M , , A r ww...•.~w A4.ti:L"'i ~.n:. , V A 0 t
IN Il S l .
4
~t1.
J / .ir r~Gc { - rr
i
.
E
r f f T I T1.4-
14 t 10 L.
is
16
20
as
a9
as f I
24 - - - I • a1
21,
It
a
- u
30
- - - ,i
34
ss {
14
If -
-s ~.~I J9
I I
k
Uwl~ena ,onu caueeror:.:.
MAD[ IM V 8.,,
_.._-y....._++,--•rr..-,.... , _ r.r w.r.~.iL`.i.ir' 1 1
.
a
0
n F r
01
II ,I
J
i
u,
1 I
f0
12
! + y._
u I
B{ y i-_ -I"rv Is
ft,
19 F C-~ " I IB
I
20
I -
it T, 21
rs E._. E....a~
tt _
26 25
rt
2.1
19
• - _ _ y_.
19
JB - _ _ il- I`__" - . - , ' 3~• III
f~ -rt-• JI
2
35 14
I
~ r
~~19
30
k ;
31
40
I .
A wiucv ravn toq r/,d, e760e 4111ty '
a a
1 r
• 1 t,.
ll
I I i .
r
le
. -/(J
~I1 fir. J
L~ I
it - ~7 )f .ir/l~l ✓ i~tr LSCAI r
i
9 r r7 Yl 1~ ' ' 1 ~ ~ ~ ~
t_. rld J/ J
7 fr _
A_
1
bin
4j - - - -
~I 1
,a
A ~f 11
I
_fj -t
t - 1
1
----'1 t--__._ _ -rv--~- - . -i+-- Vii- - - ` • ' :.-t._I_ 1 .,19
J,
1 _ f
'L _77
- Jf E a
1 _
4J
f 70 r- - - ~f i, _
II 1
a
tit 111 - .
r
- -
-41
71
7S _
f 76
71^ i--
37
39
I r
~ I
WILSON IUNII COMPANY 01106011[111 ' '
VAOI III U14 ,
-+.J~_t.h..p ~.•u~Aa.wM .I • r .Iwry NiMrL y'/iKZrii r r'.V.....
o ,
,
/ J
V6 -
r
1ln v..hJ rjri ~~~k L'. fn J i 1 + I~ f p t
/ I
'•r~ n ~ y I t 1 s
I f
( t.. _ .I i I
9 ~ n r ~,`,U C~.'jt i -'A.J'~'~ ; ~ I ' ~2~~: ~ ~ . l `1~• ~ ~ I.. ~ I i-I ~ ~ 1
f-
Lr nr~ mod/ i~~ ~ I I~ 1
i/ e~//n ,f f ..t ~1 i UISi +I ~~X i'. r~r~_..r'~'3 ~ - ~ -,I_ {a 10
I
if -
I-
-
as _ _ f f s
1 as
--1~- - - ~ - as
T4 -
1
a6 i - - rs
al i :
31
t
3r i
-1--- 3r
! I
~~Illl
rs' I r •
31 I ~ I ~ ~ ~ _
6.__ 3f
jr,
40
}f
hl
®WLLfAN JaNtB co Nl 1hY 0116!0!41N '
L _ - IJ~jl r! 10
NA01 IIf U t♦1•. ~
~.~~.-.•.....~_w.r.r_.+~,.. ~ t ~r .raw vwa, rsWC.u-n '.-•c i3iV-.... ~ A.. .
y
L r:
• a,1` % n
' ~Il , rl
i
i
't
J
v
fir:{
N
t `ff ! ~ r
r L 1.
~ iii
5~ -II
r ~
a.
r-
!S
11
20
73 t I-~- - - - u_ - I fir' .'t
f ;
41
22
3.
as y - 14
J
,
30 N It - - _
a3 r ~ - r 3a
14
11-
f
-
®WheON IWrMB COMrJe._. onoe aecea _ I - y_1.1. ! ~ - .
-A0( 14 u It 4 r
1 1 1': 1
J;
{ , I 1 I .I f.
11, f
I
as '
"',lN If
~f
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1 I~ 2 3 4 - -
~ e
I
{
I
i
r
u - ~ I i I I I f u- t-. i o
Il _ 11I 1A _
f~
to _ ~ to
N
20
21
2 PI
1 v ! I I 1 24
23
24
1 11
i
26 - N- _ _I 26
26
22 ( ~r - , - - Y I.I
27
I }
:a
29
30
34
f 1
- 1-
3 4
2e
a.... rI
R-1111-
l7 WM1IEM Id111 t0 MP1 ;Y t
,01601 0X11X
' Md01 IM
.ywr~--T~ -+-rAw--.rws w YVL. r. Y.~yY+ - ...a Y`h••,... : r t
L'`'t .C..~'111t a ti d2 ]i
r
r
•t
(1
-
r
/ 1 •'t'-, er r I t: .1 n~F;. `ai y/a
1A I -.f,
)n 4 --Ik
1 I
I ! ~ / r.~ r I ~ I } T
ITT k
10
r 1 +
u r , --,n
4
f I I
12
f 13
Id I t 1t 1 1- I r !I _
~ I I1
1
t i;J 11 f - - f.
193- E - y ~C i ~ f ~ - y'i 1~ u
r ,
I
21
20
22
j r - r 1 III .
211__.. ..111 - - -
23
i - - _ 2S
22
29 f a 20
_ r
32
_ ~ ~~~lal
•
t
s2 1 I 1
31
O as 1 _ T l
! - - - -i - - _ sl • •
30
1~ u is
aS t - - a2
40
.r
W1L10R leNt![OMrtny 0Y60~dR[IN
0[
IN U 1
.w+rawr~.~_.rw~wM1u~.M0. Y. rr4W ,~yp441L1/1 ~ .a'!Y-:: , r • • ~ 1
~ ' tr 1
3 1 I rt 1 1 ,,1 ~ ,
e
~ I
r
.r
~1 _ yr Ca/// / 1 Care'/,( ~ 2:CJt r / ~
Cu
06
1 _ W, fr)ldL~ C
r - ) fl
r 1
J -1
/7 4
+ _ .
~t I ;1L
:Yr/f,lkr
yi:k/ns'i~N 't~
r4 s
,r~ 0.~2' ~i i ~ •c r S firi~r.[, / t I + - t'- - ~ : I I
' ~ 12
J a Jr
_ II
I+
I
Js~1
f - t` J
I
21
21
23
q-t- 25
21
2d
22
29
20
f
JJ _ _
O+ - al r it j
s ! t - t_ - f f , 09
J4 i I I
f_
Own bHrwln caMaHr araoe uettH . L , . r } J4
f
MA bf J4
1 r ~ ) •
- f t 1
✓ I ~ It ~1 f l.Il
Ia d 1. L I
w f~~, t , i t ~ e !
, rl t , r3 t..~~
I I
t
r 1 . '
,
it
- ~ r
f a r
V
I ,
_ - 2dA 91
PT
E ~ !
-f- -jr
13 r _ _f._ 1.-- II
I~ I L_T ;L4 f
Ii f._I.._ li
I
r
10 u
11
24
26
4" 1-1
24 22
i ! f
11 ! 31 l
_ al
1-
32 { f 30
b J5 il-
_
ijL it
I
40
t L~ i
(1wawN+gNESOaureNr afeo~o>.ccri
f
UI !N U 6 A
+~+o.ne+~., rryWr+~ln. rv...a Y M. ww.rWl..„~~ry~.. , MA
♦ YrV 1
O r
1 I U r t t 1
t
i 1i ~ ¢r~ + r -•4i , ~ ItF it iil 111 1 -
1;~i 4}, S~ ~ Ill ~ ~ ~ ~ ~lU I 41 1 - /lr ~ ~ 1 • r v rr 44~ S?..
•
1.
•1
i
~ I i.~k.~t r~ A:l / rX ! r. / 1 • 4. a. "r'{< i.~.Ft'M: Y< r9 ~S4¢Mi1 ('.3 x ,
- F_ 1 C~r /(1,C
F '
1
/Zo
(~7IJ 16 4A
PPP _
!=r-'
2 1,/e+3 y~_ f f
i AL,
10
r i I II f
1
f ~ ~ It
a
20 ! `
19
'
r
22
It,
21,
- - - - - -
24
rL.. 1J 1 1 .
20
24
31
29
M
10
12
34
74
36
~ - M
r
I
,
Owxsow ,cvu cnnrevr
s~ -a.,_a a.a«_.r•, r,nOt 14 U 4 A
• r iaY W - • -1.M[~eel ail 1"Y YOFI"`' • . ~ , r } )e
e
11, ~~T
li ~ 'l~ ~ 1 I I f I
Z r 1 ' 1' 1
I • r'r 1
Qa/,,D/,f'CA
t a 4_ h ::n e
1 tJtJ,}r i i~ t r'r~ft OSdtl /t/f~,.C.
{ r~0 i 1, r
/ 1 r
- N r
. /;n/ C~• t1 Stl~?- t Dom" j-r r _ , ;
I
L
• IIV
r I ~ f
101 1
{ ffl
I2
ff ( - --i I7
if r
f
;
19rI f ~ ~ {I fIr 11
I. 4
I 1- f I j ~_F . 27
2S I -
f 1 2B
f
f III
21
30 u -
29
31 f
32
34
3 B I , B
I II 3
;
JI ~32
I
~a
- r
40
WIL/ JOMtf COMPANY 07ld1 dR(tr! 1-_-~ IA
4A0( I4 y~A
,wu ~r`w..,,.ww .wywM+.nWw. ~ ~ y u ,rM4YV1~ W44{]~l (t5:.1 Alil..:r..
1 ~ J.`, illl Ju.'~M1 I 1 1 La ( ! I -41 1 r :1,
1
1 1
pp ~t
t
l C JS~~'1/ ~_i j.I /{9 ! I , nor :a•,:r :vr-.wr 1 a~-;!3Tr ail^.vh`;^ I j
F
POO,
~b - 3l
t JiJ)' 7>/r/~?27?`/ 1~ 1. `~'C • i E! 2 I
.~4 I~ r ! -
1 1, ~ 1 J~ I( -E t 3 r
Iz
Oil
14
t u
I
i
-t- - IS
E!
rl
14 F - It
24
re - r h--~- i i
-if
21 I~
} r.
41L -
21 ,1-I ~ - _ - - - - _ _ - ~ _ I I I -1 ,
n' f E-' - )
,J
. {J II
e i
J{
JB •
44
rr
- _ I
30
40
O Wa/ON IOh[f COMPANY 01!01 tllll[N - LL,' -
J- L
.h~l-r~~r...~+.V+..-dw.. r u w.r lrrl✓:.J4ip1{kM I:a 'v I~"a - NAO$ IN II[ \ 1 1,. -
L i.
i`
1
J
.l r~f ~~7 /f SY.-- f n,/ < rr- - _ _..__c:•_ /O__. ~.f i. ' ,i+
u
I
Ir,F
n ~i I
7 a
- - 1
t
1 , 4
1 f { ! - fl .~1~ 1
f
}1
1
to ~ 1,--{ ( _ to
f'~ {
r - J -i..{ j. 19
21
ae
Jc # - - _
Jt _ _
31
- - -
-
rr ,
r
Owu.unJO!.AScoMOA4Y
u L. - i t
..---••-.~-,.•.~.,...r. ` . ,........•rtC,r.: r- Yxee IN
i
I 1 }
-
• . - 1:11 ~ .a 1 ,t, sVy it -
R
t.. 1 fC2iF.fO//Y(kl' c Cf ' ~1u 4~~~ Jr i~ r _ ~~X__
14
+ f JJ
2llr 7•:i , ++/r, ~r.rt/Cl~~
~r)p,-; :rid _ , r r 't -'1 -J - + - .r•_1_ _ I 2
a _
1I
~ ! I.,. ' a 1
9
10
I
12
13
11
14
is
20
,
1 E
24
.-L 24
t
f rr
:
31
t9i' j _ } is
la
1 ~ 'I
~WIabN ION91 cAMMNY 0 7 10 6 0111IN " ~
.
MAO( IN U i A
V ••l j _ ril
'1. r.
1
1~ l
v -
I
2- i
1~'~(',._ /~;irlf.t r4 /!.4~JXr•)`l7t"it~
-
2 _
u I /
:Jf T
1 C"1.LC
I
L?,}DlCr _-./s''K Ui 44) I~
1. f - - - - ''I elf I 1
. _ _ ~ f . _ _ ~ _ - Its' - " - I l
r ~I--
I]I-
IS F----I1
14
- - u
Of { - i h - - - - y t E It
1
22, tI_L' r 121
I 1 H f
at
10
31 -t
12
j - 1 IO
W
12
14
f _
I
31 IT -
31
*WILS0.N IUNIS CON,rANx 01901 Cllroll MAOt IN V / x
~h~1:rr...Y~-wsx.V...,•~w. ,.._r • VrN N. 4wVn\IM'lif/l,l+l,~.~1tl rf , r`~
V I '
'1 5 5
1
Jll( ,n
91
7..i, isAA✓/.fir ~1/'2.:h~ lj c`~~' 1 ~ . _ { ~ _ tl- _ _ : ~j~i~i I ~
i
14
I I
L .
Is It I
- - II
i
Al-
191 _
~ t
71
22
f- ! - - '-121
23
ti; i .
----j • r ~ - it . _ _ _ _ _ . _ ',7S
16 -
f
7t I 1
71
21
111111 - i
- - - - - - 79
Y
34 i-
4 1
-4 1
I
- - -f
-1
pp
0WILAd4 0411 IA IA NY 01101011erN -r~t`
NAOr IN .
S]
)JV
C) iti-
12-
1 / ~IXNyi,' r r r
1 ~n 1 ~l - , a
~i1A : r r-!'liilf' ' I}/Urf I I i l
9 ~ 1 k ~"-j- I- f R ~ _7 - •t t l.. f r; B ` 1,
12
14
}
~r „
I
20
1+ I L 20
F - f h- _ tit" ~21
2 2:' 1 -
I
aa . I
is 24
- - 1 l r l i 2s
j
t.
29
• j I ! l ; ; 6
al ~ I _
L to
J3
31
as
a6 - {
34
as
to 1-
j al
to
tlwn.wq,owueoMrepr 61904 eAetu
wAOt IM V f A '
• is
.W r
~(.tt r ~~%f JC`r`ia/Q i0tf /yf L!r.
tJn it}. `~1 II 7G i! ~~~__1/ l~O1ai~r,reG rG 9/
-1-i
K
I
r ! E- } - - _-k I 6
9 ; S'5-~ I,/!T•_fp.~! (16 ~i1nli i'/~f~'!,_- I /~(~i~'4 rj~ _ ~rih 7 h /e~,i_j i I
10 E d { - 7 4-~ - 'H !
f y _
t J t-
12
13
- f
14
to I a
14
t
is I I
is
16,
L
20
- - - - - - - - - - - -
I . }
21
u
24
21
r-
26 1 - - it t _ - - - f 2}
21
, IF
d
28
I4 ~ - {
29
D
f ~ I
134
4 4-
40
C WIL"N IJHf1 [OM/ANY d1101 Mtn _ E ,
MAOA IN U 4 l
r..~...-....... ....w.~w.. . r.a~.uawrr~r:wN~i~;l .X'vAt•• I. ~1rt\~ Il ~~\t, + ,
I
l
I,
,
:
{
it
t U _
_ ~'h✓ ~i /frrx l c 7<~. x tIt ~'r ~rf d r.!
V ~ L la,
VA,
i r 1 1~.
,
:
s j f ~i a
1
I ,
r
i ff
11fi
-
14
}
r i' 1 } _ J
I
_ ~ I
22
J r i I I- • r t
I II i - _ j 21
13 F- _-i. ~ ~ ~ if--}
-
{ I!(
24
~
I 2J
22' t
41 f
10 ~ ! '
-
I
ift
OWIL4GN reNee CO4 MAY
_
a ~ _...:.-,..w. .I ~w.r...rr.-a.. e.,, Y. .•dtrK«~ ~ ;I r'' ant lH Ul ='`•I`r itl ti)~,y~ /r ei ,4rn,l' *-0}~ i},±i iE 11 rNlrs_`~l
S~~l 11
.~f S,
z7Y
u F Q ru,sc,'~
- r it r ~ I ~2 44 /ell
I 7 ~k._t - r fF / /
-
4
er -1
' ,1 I
4 14 i
1_ I -JA
to
I ~
13 . -41 _ 12
14
} M
III -
21
-r 41 20
22
23
21 - - I -
16 L - ~I ! ---4L- 25
,t 26 26
30 - 78
71 fi : _ BO
IF _ t
111
f
Y _
34
- I -
0w,iaoN ror.n MWPA:veteel nAtrN
. .-M«-~...~....Yi....+~. _:.s ~ +.n w.:uu= " .YNiY' A u.v^• vA01 IN U 1 • f • ` ~r f p i f
l , r) J i e JI¢
7t J 11yy f ~ 1~ tit
• e 4 i ~ ~ ' f ~ x ~P4 , ~f jR7 vti, ri Sr - ,i tytf{ ~ l~kFn✓wl 1 ,i~~,
P
;f .l
--n m
S - j ' - ~ 2 T ~ _ e_ e = e
y ~
r - j.f...~. f
I ~
r r r I
r _ J- - - - I r
_ I
111 q E` i I
10,1
t~-~I r-
1t
44.
f
~ I1
I_ I _ 1
i
11 ~ ,
i I
19, F ~ 1
1
2r '
22
27
_ 4t-. _ rs
_ I
E 6...L•
43
I'Jd
1r. ~ N._ ~ •r -~j' - it - f --~_rs
sl 27
r
10 I - - - 2
O Wn.wN /OM00 COMMNY 01106011 IN - -
r;
` 4161 IV V 0 A
1
5~ ` Ili' I 1 ' ~ JI Sc 41 tt
i '
s
a~
ti
nF
i
i
1
1
r~ I
i
F:7
r..
r
171 L IE
ti .
t