Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-22-1991 Mill- ..,,`teti,7"F'.£ar,+S".w~.rd..'•;',rZ b4 wttk,Ure'~riaA&.,.,,,Ru~"a"a4:~rwxxSMYV r"~t":~a5katl'~"a:nc,`Ryf..wrr k~w 7774 1 Cld.+i r.Y~ ~ #'m., ~'J'~. '?yr~,14si~l~C~".4~lli1N~d~,t tiC2YtG'IP~1~lAtiubYa~"•x`ikJ..°.d,y7~. A'.~u~Q~NaU+t^"~w"".r /~~n gg~,, t11 r 1 y~~,~y ~ ~ysi. S7• _j1~,~t i. i ~Iggy)'ry~~l1~dJry~✓~~t~'~y, ~ r`ri ~ p.R a iy,} / Ief " 1 ry,r wlir"uN~`t~~'}11 . ~ X3A YwiP541D .ifi + Nil(' a ~ •ilib'4AiiwT ~ff:'f'.~ d '.91. I~ Yi W4'Y . ~'t ' PLANT SCHEDULE - LOT 6 G LOTG Minimum K4x.,_. 00101 Quint III Lize I r a R rk Opt% Quercus shuaardii Red Oak 18 2 1!2' u1, , 10' x 6' Straight trunk continuous or RIB. Uterus crassifolia Cedar Elm zG 3" Cal. 10' x 6' Straight trunk continuous or R,B. Ilex Oecidua Possomhow 14 61•8' Hgt, 31•4' Multi trunk, 86B §HBUMA C ADelia Grandifora Abel ia S6o 6 Gal, 18' x 24" Full plant, container grown, plant ' i 24" 0,c, Leucophyllum Frutesuens Texas $age 560 6 Gal, 18" x 24" Full plant, container grown, plant y 241 o.c. Hespelalos Parviflora Red Yucca .SjsCp S Gal, l8' x 24" F ull plant, container grown, plant '4✓ 24" o r c r YI,.INE8 Y` Parthenoccissus ' Ouiquefolia Virginia Creeper "50 1 Gal, Stakedr full elants, ~T + Min, thre~ 3a runners, + Gelsemium Sempervirens Carolina Jasamine 60 1 Gal. Staked full plants, 1 Min. five runners QROUf~~ COVER 4' length, (lire to well. ( Liriope Spicata Creeping liriope 15".5 4" pot Full plant, foliage to cover top of container= plant 12 o.c, Juniperlis conferta Blue Pacific Juniper 3426 1 Gal, ` Full plant, foliage to cover top of container; plant I2" o,c, i~Q' Buchloe Dactyloides Buffalo Grass X8000 0.0 Seed 3I rVrVr :r,1hi'N tM"::art: M'at-gPr !-101 r 14. 1M.0) , /ks~rl 19 ,~'n, ~v. tf t,cw~v Mlt1~lz PAMWAY e 17P-ee 'r) r i PD 16 Z O N I N C1~(Jq~ ~111is~ /Al~QJMldr iAJ ir4ANrX+ RO W' f IEffi - l , PLhWT SCHEDULE - LOT l OUAU ; `'ECIES SIZE COMM8NZ5 % f 4 10 Q 3 A,ghan Pine : Prnu4 Elaoru:o Cu. 646 ! t o 5 ti i I Shumard Dal; ; Qutreus a"' Cot, 8tb !xti>/~619' -r- ~rl '.rte Petan:Cogo 111inoisensls i?""Cal bob ear ~ m 2z Redbud,Mexaoc,nt Ctrtis 5'-6' Nursery 1, ~IH s C9r,gdtnSl6 (MLYi~Onq) Tall Grown 1 Alf J 0 14 Burfcraiiolly: Ilex burfordi ►55g1, ( ' 310 Carrsso N0113; Ilex CarnUka $ Goa. VOt S (carts) t4500 t;• 13u4falq Gras:, Su6ADz Nydromulcl, of F Doc y4otdts (Prairic~ Y?, 0416,Pcr SAS ON 5 N t , 10(50 s,f. I f000;'s 'P~aritVOrit~y ' I r kJ F 1tl A ' 10 ~al~i ~ftf S I •y` 4~ ~ a MRY , 1 I ~ oo sQ•pr, I r 11 v " Puxcal ~ , ~wi>~ 1 PHASe A'~ (It,°oo'~~Pr~ I (IB,OOo Ar. I'  ii 6 WIgR, r V '1 ~ ' Street cor real ~ ~ ~ I treet configuration illustrates proposed SDHPT i >r s t I € improvemer %I% i wNelei nprovements.: f,~9f,GVd 17' ) s' B L 00, vr/K«sN, LINE ti I..._ - - Current st OZZ irrent streets are 2-Lane undivided asphalt, s' b' ILI7YSM' e A11 signs w 'PAV •w~s~Re r regulation 1 signs shall be in conformance vith'AYrticle 17, "sign' gulations", B-Zoning Ordinance, a. ndscaping shall conform to that shown on the plan and W ¢ YIy..~fIW I~.Yn'N'~e worm"Landscapin c ~,Q"JTfPAF"AX plant sche ant schedul#, LILLIAN MILLER PARKWAY Ir 1. F.M. 2181 (.,.Y_EASLEY LANE r f SI~Y ,E~rsr/~ p r W)15 JE Dr~A{luf W/ cfQAP- EdJ~ Oki .-~OJCfYL Z-7 I.M 5 s, Detail Plan I Preliminary Plat 1 R. N. W. ADDITION n 3 r Block One, Lots, A, B, and C 5 Being 11,20 Acres { <p f' C, Poullaller Survey A-1006 City and County of Denton, Texas ,v a. [ 'i a .a _ t , a ~ i \ e .p~ Pn h f} n+~ s , i i SCALE 1" 60'-0' t4_ :o Go_ lb fec City of Denton F and NCNB Texas National Bank, 'Trustee 1 j - r i r; Y 7 A' Fwd ri~'i'~ 4 I' , a e I ! ' $ 4 `'Il~. r. r. 'fir " F,d. ~.l,:'t',~. F •ar,' k~d;y LLai,i. r~x+~a h s~.k_.at, :r.~is '.sr Y;14cn e~IN,~sua~:, dikra~`.:~ Y~,uY~,~:k Rits'lAt~dlli2tw$I~tY ''i~,yy,,JJ}.~~1~ ,r ~~11R1YFAYPM~~~~iHKSY O➢rci~ i r• 4 a 4ii fR%K.NRN'~S~` 1 I, jH EoNSIAU~~iDN co I.. FND SO TU FND SO TUBE N 87031'50" W 185.62' 81 C.E. IN DCDICAT10 o BLOCK 8 P112PERTY DBIC,d,ItTION LOT 41A I 4,876 ACRES STATE of TEXAS I + COUNTY OF DENTON I r I I N WHEREAS, 3-K Construction, Inc„ D/B/A Kraft Construction Company r 3 owner of that certain tract of land situated in the Nathan Wade S' c lOT 1 LOr 2 LQ Abstract Number 14070 Denton County, Texasl Being all that certain 1,222 acre tract or parcel of land ` 4 , I Q conveyed to First State Bank of Denton by trustees deed _ I 8' CIE, recorded in Volume 2496, Page 449 Real Property Records, N I C Denton County, Texas and including Lot 41, Block B of M Bellaire Heights Addition, Phase Five, an addition to the I City of Donton according to the plat recorded in Cabinet D, N I p slide 284, Plat Records, Denton County, Texas, said 1,222 ILL IM rn Tll~r nar~Inl1~r1V AAl-nr -I h--QA AA /n1~AWf~ = "--qua I^ ~d >ro c v ~ cn J J Ito I z - _ FND SO TUBE I BLOCK B t- LOT 418 a' D,E, n' -r.ae " 0,346 ACRES S 02 1050900W PAMW 1 L•E6~91'I FIP SIP FIP j i i D FAIR I CARL v Ls 106,99' R~ 50100' j w SIP An122'36' 0'! 1 S 7405903'26" 87 I u LOT 42 Ch■N 76' 18 8772'~ s►  Given under my hand and seal of office this tho clay o . 19911 Public for the State o Notary LOT 43 Commission expires LOT 45 LOT 46 LOT 47 LOT 48 F LOT , I LOT 44 T I 1 C. JI_T E G~ I I KNOW ALI, MEN By THESE PAESENTSi That I, Stanford Nauptmann, Registered Public Surveyor, do certify that this plat and description was prepared from an acts L. t -y^ 4 f. ~.,f. G E -N Q FIP - Found 1/2" Rebar MON - Monument ROW Right-of-Way SIP - Set 1/2" Rebar -X- - Fence Line -E- - Electric L',c ~T- Telephone Line MH Manhole PP Power Pole MOW SCALE 1 ~e ,oo LP - Light Pole 0 FH Fire Hydrant Center Line 0 6 10 20 30 BaL~ Building Line GRAPHIC SCALE IN UaEa-- Utility Easmts OaEo- Drainage Easmts =j C+Eo- Communications Easmt. R t 1 4 •I{ w 1 E 1 I I f rr it! 1 i i i - rt f1 AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL January 22, 1991 i Work session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, January 22, 1991, at 5:15 p.m. In the Civil Defense Room of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: may Note: aAny lso item listed on the tthe he Work sfor n the be considered asAgpart of for Reguldr Meeting. 5:15 p.m. > i f 1. Executive Session: i A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Consider action In Dyson v. City of Denton. 2. Consider action in County vs City. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art, 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Hoard Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Consider appointments to the Building Code Hoard, community "velopment Block Grant Committee, the E1•ctrical Code Board, the Historic Landmark Commission, the Hunan Services Committee, the Animal Shelter Advisory Committee, the Blue Ribbon Committee for Storm Water Utility and the Sign Board of hppe.Is. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the 2. potential sale of the City's commercial solid waste system and consider possible alternatives. i 3. Receive a report and hold a discussion amending Article 11, Planned Developments, of the Zoning ordinance. 4. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding proposed amendments to the concept map of the Denton Development Plan to provide for the expansion of the Special Purpose Activity Center and amending the boundaries of Intensity Areas NI, 9, 10, 45, 1051 107, 109, 110 and Ill of Appendix A. 1 i i i i 1 City of Denton City Council Agenda January 22, 1991 Page 2 Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday. il Ch January 22, 1991, at 7-ODen.ton, in this Texas Catn whi h athec following Hall, 215 5 E Mc . McKlne~ed: ll items will be considered: 7-00 p.m. 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2, Receive a citizen report from CCarlDenYoung ton a regarding has Blacks feel about the City Practices. policie towards Blacks especially employment P 3. Public Hearings and consider approval of A. Hold a public hearing preliminary and final replate from Lot 41 and additional unplatted land to Lots 41A and 41D Phase V Block B. Bellaire Heights Subdivision, located at the Mockingbird Lane end (The Howard east commission recommends approval). f an B, Hold a public hearing and onedder ado otnoPlanned t~ ordinance approving s Detail Pln portion of Planned Development 16 and a tore of a mixed use Development 19 for the pup dove?opment cousist4ig of a public alibrary# acre station, and shopping center on n 11.20 truot of land located at the southwest ut Teasley =nLanef Lillian Miller Parkway and zoning Commission 2-90-016 (The planning a p recommends approval). C. !told a public hearing and Dcons der adoption of tan ordinance approving purpose of constructing a fast food restaurant on a 0.6941 acre tract of land located north of Colorado Boulevard and west of LZ 90299 and in o commission recommends front of andE Planning Target approval). D. Hold a public hearing and consider do tionaof3an ordinance designating the ptopetty loca Mounts Street a historic landmark under Article and (H 90 28A of the Comprehensive Zoning ordinance 001). H-90-001 Commission recommends approvall) Wing ' I Y i City of Denton City Council Agenda January 22, 1991 Page 2 Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesdays January 22, 1991, at 7:00 p.m. In the Council Chambers of City Halls 215 f:. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: 7:00 p.m. 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Receive a citizen report from CarlDeoun regarding ow Blacks feel about the City of nton and policies cE: towards Blacks especially employment practices. 3. Public Hearings ; As Hold a public hearing and consider approval of preliminary and final replate from Lot 41 and additional unplattei land to Lots 41A and 418, 1 Block B, Bellaire, Heights Subdivisions Phase V located at the and C of Howard Court and east Of Mockingbird Lane. Commission recommends approval). B. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance approving a seta pled Plan ofn Planned Development 16 and Development 19 fot the purpose of a mixed Eiuse re development consisting of a public anibr 20 acre stations and shopp 9 center on tract of land located at then lout Teasley cornet Of v Lillian Miller Parkway and Zoning Commission Lane. z-90-016 (The ecommends approval).ning r C. Hold a public covintg a ndDetailedconsider Plantiforo the ` ordinance app i purpose of construceing a fast food restaurant on ; a 0.6941 acre tract of land located north of Colorado Boulevard and west of Loop 299 and in J front of and zoning store. Z-90-012 recomm®nds Planning approval). ; D. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance designating the property located at 305 Mounts Street a historic landmark under Article 90 - 29A of the comprehensive Zoning Ordinance Cloning 001). H-90-001 (The Planning Commission recommends approval). 1 4 t City of Denton City Council Agenda ' January 22, 1991 Page 3 4. Consent Agenda Each of those items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations, Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the city Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. r Listed below are bids and urcha order t be approved for payment under the Ordinance 8e sections ofo the agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda Items S,A, 5-B). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any Item prior to approval of the ordinance, A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Did #1191 - Plest vehicle ; 2. Did 01193 - Truck and Dump Bodies 3. Bid 01194 - Digger Derrick and Truck 4, Bid #1195 - High Pressure Hose Assvmoliss 5. Bid 01204 - 69 KV Circuit Breakers 6. P.C. 011704 - Advance Control Systems 7. P.C. 011705 - Motorola B. Plats and Replete 1. Consider the preliminary replat of Lot 1 and additional unplatted land to Lot 1R, Block As Denton Bible Church Addition located on the south side o: University Drive near Its f andeZoningoCommi sion recommends (approval). 2. Consider the preliminary plat of the R.N.N. Addition, Lots A, B, and C, Block 1 located at the southwest corner of Lillian Miller and Teasley Lana, (The Planning and zoning Commission recommends approval). 7 I 1 City of Denton City Council Agenda January 22, 1991 Page 4 5. Ordinances A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. (3.B.1. - Bid #1191. 3.B.2. - Bid 01193, 3.8.3. - Bid #1194, 3.13.4. - Bid 01199, 3.8.5. - Did 01204) B. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for purchases o: materials or equipment which are available from one source in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. (3.B.6. - PC 011704, 3.B.7. - PC 011705) C. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing publication of Notice of Intention to issue Certificates of Obligation of the City of Denton, Texas. D. Consider adoption an ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas, approving a Planned Development btstrict Detailed Plan for 1.727 acres of land located on the 1-35 service road, adjacent to Wolfe Nursery. E. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an interlocal agreement between the City of Denton and the Texas Municipal Power Agency. i 6. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. JJ 7. Official Action on Executive Session Itemas A i A. Legal Matters e. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments City of Denton City Council Agenda January 22, 1991 Page 5 8. New business: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. t 9. Executive Session: ~ a i A. Legal Matters Under See. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under See. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 3 1 NOTES THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT 16 LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE. ~ I C E R T I P I C A T S 1 certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1991 at o1olock (a.m.) I CITY SECRETARY J 3339C s i U ► Ilk : i r ~ r dpeNR~~ I , CI rV ofDENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 6668308 Office of the COY Secrefery M E M O R A N D U M To: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jennifer Walters, City Secretary DATE: December 10. 1990 SUBJECT: Board/Commission Vacancies The following boards/ commissions currently have vacancies which the Council will need to fill: Community Development Block Grant Committee Sonja Wesley resigned due to her employment with the City of Denton. Her term suns from 1989-1991. Electrical Code Board Leonard Starnes resigned as he has moved out of the city, His term runs 1989-1991. Jim Robbins resigned as he also has moved out of the City. (See attached letter) His term runs 1989-1991. As best as can be determined, neither of these individuals were directly recommended by any of the businesses in the community as a result of the article released earlier regarding positions on the City's boards/commissions. JJi ! 1 Historic Landmark Commission Gerald Stone resigned due to a potential conflict of interest, (Bee attached letter) His term runs 1990-1992. Hu" A servigos Committee Don Hayes resigned as he has moved out of state. His teas runs 1989-1991. Gloria Contreras resigned as she has moved out of the City. See 4 attached letter from Barbara Ross, Her term runs 1990-1992. r' 1 ~ E a i Board/Commission vacancies Page 2 In a relatsd matter, the Animal Shelter Advisory Committee has two members whose terms have now expired. The Committee was f ormed in September of 1999 and members were appointed by Cou twon mel in December to be appointed for terms to xpirer on ordinance, 1 30, 1990 and three members were to be appointed for terms to expire on June 30, 1991. Members of the Committee are Nonie 4ri Kull, Jesus Nava, Betty Johnson, Steve Meyerdirk, and Mike Widmer. Nava's and Widmer's term have expired. According to the ordinance, their membership qualifications are a city R' official and a person who is not involved by occupation or membership with a veterinarian, city official, animal shelter, or animal welfare organization. I would be happy to research any further information you may need to fill these vacancies. E i i Je er tars Cit sore ry 3324C j ~ ! i I i y A i M, Q 4 E `p CITY of DEN TON f Community Dewlopment Office 110 Weal Oak sulte a Denton, Texas 78201 (617) 363.7728 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and Members of City Council ' Frtm: Barbara Ross, Community Development Coordinator Date: January t6, 199I M Subject: Human Services Committee Appointment Gloria Contreras has recently moved to Fort Worth and Informed the Community Development Of/ice that she Is resigning from the Human Serillcos Committee (HSC). HSC will begin service agency funding hearings In March and would appreclate the appointment of a new member as soon as possible. Thank you. garb reR oss - 1 1 I t 1 3003E r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION CREATING THE BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE FOR STORM WATER UTILITY TO FORMULATE AND PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE PUBLIC UTILITY BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL RELATIVE TO THE NEED OF A STORM WATER UTILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. } SECTION 1. There is hereby, created and established the Blue Ribbon Commit *e for Storm Water Utility, which shall be composed I of nineteen persons selected from the following groups and organi- sational 2 Members of the Public Utilities Board 1 Member of the Planning i Zonin Commission g t 's Plannin Department i Member Member of of the the CiCity's Community Services Administration Department 1 Member of the City's Utility Administration Department 1 Member of the City's Parks i Recreation Department 1 Member from the Chamber of Cow rce 2 Members selected from Local Businesses 4 Members selected from residential areas i Member selected from the League of Women Voters i 1 Member selected from the University of North Texas j I Member selected from the Texas Woman's University I Member selected from the Denton Independent School District 1 Member representative of Denton Industry SECTION II. It shall be the charge of the Storm Water Utility Advisory Coast! to tot I a. Review and evaluate the necessity of establishing a Storm Water Management Utility for the City of Denton and to submit an evaluation to the Publio Utilities board which shall include a recommendation of whether the City should pursue the establishment of such a Utility. bs Should the Committee recommend the establishment of said Utility, the Committee shall provide recommenda- tions to the Public Utilities Board regarding the most feasible method for astablishing said Ut.lityo SECTION 111, That this resolution shall be effective ia- media e y upon to passage and approval. 'S fi r ti i r f r i I PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 19900 CAS JENNIFER VALTERSm CITY SECRETARY i j ;D19PAR AS 0 LWAL TORMI A A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATCORNZY { BY1 i j I JJ~ 1 1 a PAGE 2 gg, i ..J r --r f ` - r - f` 1 . s CITYoI DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING I DENTON, TEXAS 762011 TELEPHONE (817) 66&8308 , 1 Office of the City Secrefdry r M E M O R A N D U M T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council i_ FROM: Jennifer Walters, City Secretary t DATES January 17, 1901 y SUBJECT: Agenda Sack-up materials Back-up materials for Agenda Item 5:15 02 will be provided 1> under separate cover. r= i Jann er tore g; t City~ecre ty e ~4 ri F i` 's t- . ~r is-' i t I ,s. A 1 CITY of DENTON, TisXAif MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 1 MLMORANDUM DATE: January 16, 1991 TO: 14ayor and City Council i FROM: Frank H. Robbins, Executive Director Planning and Development SUBJECT: ARTICLE 11 AMENDMENT WORK SESSION REQUESTED ACTION: Consensus to prepare an ordinance for consideration on February S, 1991. BACKGROUND: I At the Planning and Zoning meeting of May 23, 1990, during a discussion about large tract development, amending Article 11, Planned Developments (PD), such that detailed building footprints would not be required in the first step of the PD process was discussed. There was a consensus then, that the y provision of that very detailed information years in advance of t actual construction was very problematic; that many PD's are often amended several times because of minor site plan amendments; and that in many cases, requiring building g footprint and like data of such fine detail was not necessary during the first steps of the PD process. i The newly appointed Zoning Ordinance Task Force considered I amending Article 11 in November. They took testimony from some 1 J of our largest landowners, and from local developers familiar with PD's. Staff briefed the Planning and Zoning Commission I about the Task Force's discussions on November 28, 1990. There was a Planning and Zoning Commission consensus to proceed at ' that time. On December 6, 1990, the Task Force recommended adoption of an ordinance allowing three stepps' not requiring "footprints" in the first two steps, and eliminating the development schedule. The task force also recommended that there be no minimum development size that could be reviewed with the three step process. 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 431.2529 "I 1 l Y January 16, 1991 Page 2 During these November and December discussions, it was thought that the existing PD system would be left in place and the three step process would be added; that there would be two separate types of PD's. After further staff consultation, it j was felt that leaving the existing system In place would leave unnecessary procedures and regulatory language in place, but instead, simply have one type of PD system, but allow the j developer, P&Z, or Council to have the Detailed Plan (with footprints) approved by ordinance where very fine details were necessary to insure appropriate compatibility and impact mitigation, SU."AFY OF ARTICLE 11 AMENDMENT: 1. A three step process with three district plans. a. General Concept. Includes showing broad land use categories on a map, a table of less broadly defined uses, a and development standards for each use. A site analysis of existing land use and environmental characteristics would be required. The General Concept Plan would be ! adopted by ordinance. i i b. Development Plan. A more detailed list of uses would be shown on a plan or map. Able to be combined with General Concept Plan, approved by ordinance. c, Detailed Plan. No change from existing informational requirements. Approvable by P&Z. Appeal by developer to Council of denial. If 20 percent of land within 200 feet is protested, Council must approve by majority vote. 200 foot notice given and public hearing before consideration, 2. Steps 1, 2, or 3 would be combined. 3. Additional information at any stop may bF required. 1 4. Conditions may be added at any step. 5. Broad criteria for approval by PAZ of the detailed plan are listed. 6. There would be no development schedule. The detailed plan's approval would be valid for 24 months, with Pf,Z extension up to one year. i f a j 7 s f ~ January 16, 1991 Page 3 7. This amendment would replace the existing Article 11. The application of the amendment would still apply to PD's approved before May 20, 1986, 9. Fee Schedule Request approval of detailed plan: 1,000.00 plus 50.00 per acre, or part thereof, to a maximum of r $6,000.00. Request approval of a general r, concept or development plan: S00.00, plus 125.00 per acre, or part thereof, to a maximum of $6,000.00. Minor amendment of a detailed plan or extension of time: $175.00 e all ik H. o s AICP dx ATTACHMENTS: P6Z Minutes, November 28, 1990 P4Z Minutes, January 9, 1991 4 2sl2x 1 Q I i I 1 ATTACHMENT 1 P&2 Minutes November 28, 1990 Page 17 The Commission examined the old boundaries and the proposed new boundaries of the planning area. plan by Denton DeveloPm e l PurposetActivity B. Discus an expanding the bo undaries of the the Special expand g ~ Center. + Mr. Seess explained that the Denton Development Plan (DDP), adopted in September 19880 designated the Municipal Airport Area as a Special Purpose Activity Center. The center encompasses a gross area of approximately 4,533 acres of which 10077 acres or 23,76% is floodplain. Staff is proposing to add approximately 2 1 784 acres to eboSpecial undaries ofeethe Activity delineating Activity Center, std!f reviewed the criteria established by the Appendix A Task Force, with regards to physical and environmental featuress location and shape of tract,, and land use compatibility. Ms. Brock said that even though there were no limits on ' intensity in the Activity Centers she still wants a clear picture of proposed developments. The commission examined the proposed boundaries. C. Discuss amending Article 11 "Planned Development District" of Appendix B-Zoning ordinance. Ms. Fesharl stated that under the current planned development (PD) ordinances an applicant goes through a ~ two step process involving a concept plan and a detailed conceptual phase plan. The current requirements for the of a PD are extremely detailed in character. Staff is discussing with the Zoning Task Force adding a new type of PD which may have up to three steps. Building footprints would not be required during the rezoning { processt however, they would be required in the Detailed Plan. This is being proposed in order to better achieve the theory of a Concept Plan to be conceptual by nature. There is a provision in the current ordinance in which all sites s plan, t The (l concet acres-in plan siwould submit a detailed be completely bypassed* in addition, the detailed plan would substitute for the preliminary plats This xust be heard by both the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. All proposed developments larger than ten (10) acres may initially submit a concept plan before submitting a detailed plan. The concept plan must be ; heard by both the planning and Zoning Commission and City + 1-1 I I P&Z Minutes , November 28, 1990 Page 18 council. If the detailed plan does not substitute for a preliminary plat, then the detailed plan need only be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The three step process would be an option for the applicant. It would give the applicant more flexibility because they often do not know the exact business that will develop on r their property at the time of zoning. Development schedules would be submitted at the detailed plan stage. Ms. Feshari reviewed with the Commission the exact steps 4 of both the old and proposed now processes. Ms. Brock asked if there is currently any pressure on the City to use a speedier process. ::r. Robbins said yes. The three step process will be•a I useful tool for any large acre developer. Rewriting Article 11 can be done faster than the rewrite of the entire zoning ordinance. r Mr. Engelbrecht noted that the subject was discussed at the last Zoning Task Force meeting. Some developers will t be coming to most and discuss the proposal at the next meeting. Ms. Feshari said that the three stop process will allow I M more flexibility. it dons not tie developers into exact I building footprints which they may not know at the concept plan stage. Mr. Engelbrecht said that he thought it would be helpful to look at a PD case and see what was done and what could have been done using the three step process. The Zoning Task Force was also concerned about the 10 acre cut-off. There re a lot of requirements for small property owners. vIT. Director's Report Mr. Robbins gave a summary of what the Platting Committee has been working on. He reported that the Zoning Task !arse has been focusing on the proposed amendment to Article Ile He ' said that they are a good group of people that will tell you what they think. He also noted that the Commission may went to consider appointing one of their mambers to the Drainage Task Force. Meeting adjourned at 10:15 psms 1-2 r VWPW ti s F ATTACHMENT 2 P&z Minutes DRA ary 9, 1991 X144 Janu Page 11 Motion carried (6-0). IX. Hold a public hearing and consider amending Article 11, Planned Development (PD), of Appendix B, Zoning of the Code of Ordinances. Staff Report: Mr. Robbins reviewed the proposed ordinance with the Commission. Mr. Robbins said that the original recommendation was to have two procedures for planned developments. Since then, it has been decided that two procedures will be too confusing. Those procedures have been streamlined into one. The Commission discussed amending Article 11, Planned Developments at its meeting of May 23, 1990, during a discussion about large tract development. The idea was such that detailed building footprints would not be required in the first step of the PD process. In many cases, requiring building footprint and like data of such fine detail was not necessary during the first step of the PD process. The Loning Task Force took testimony from some of our largest landowners, and from local developers familiar with PD's. staff briefed the commission about the Task Force's discussion on November 281 1990. During these discussion, it was thought that the existing PD system would be left in place and the three step process would be added; that there would be two separate types of PD's. After further staff consultation, it was felt that leaving the existing system in place would leave unnecessary procedures and regulatory language in place, but instead, simply have one type of PD system, but allow the developer, P&Z, or Council to have the Detailed Plan (with footprints) approved by ordinance where very fine details were necessary to insure appropriate compatibility and impact mitigation. Mr. Robbins summarized the amendment of Article 11 as follows: 1. A three step process with three district plans. a. General Concept. Includes showing broad land use categories on a map, a table of less broadly defined uses, and development standards for each use. A site analysis would be required. The General Concept Plan would be adopted by ordinance. b. Development Plan. A more detailed list of uses would be shown on a plan or map. Last step in zoning, able to be combined with General concept plan, approved by ordinance. 2-1 1 Pb2 Minutes LORM January 91 1991 Page 12 istin informational c. Detailed Plan. No change from ex by developer to requirements. Approvable by PbZ. and Council in case of denial. 200 foot notice given The public hearing before consideration. STAFF NOTE: commission may wish to consider adding a neighborhood appeal to Council, if landowners of tot of the land adjacent to the detailed plan protest. 2. The district could not be finally created without a C. development plan's approval. 3. Steps 1 and 2 would be combined by submitting a development plan. 4. Additional information at any step may be required. 5. Conditions may be added at any step. 6. Broad criteria for approval by P&Z of the detailed plan are listed. 1 led 7. Thane woul be no develoment would be valid fore 24 months, withiP&Z plan's app app extension up to one year. 8. Again, this amendment would replace the existing Article 11. The application of the amendment would still apply to PD's approved before May 20, 1986. 9. Fee Schedule Request approval of detailed plan: $50.00 0. 0 0 acre 1 or part thereof, to a 1 maximum of $6,ooo.00 s Request approval of a general concept or development plans $500.00, plus $25.00 per acre, or part thereof, to a m a x i m u m O f $6,000.00. Minor amendment of a detailed plan $1e tension of time: 2-2 a E P&2 Minutes DRAFT January 9, 1991 Page 13 Ms. Brock asked if the amendment will apply to PDs done prior to 1986. Mr. Robbins said that it will apply to some of them. Ms. Brock clarified that all four conditions must be true, not some of the them.. Mr. Robbins said that there needs to be an appeal process. The commission will not know many details when they see the general land use plan. Mr. Appleton noted that the ordinance says the Commission may approve the detail plan. He asked if that means they don't have to or if it should read that the commission "shall" approve the detailed plan. j Itr. Morris said that the commission will have final i~uthority to approve detailed plans. They will have to follow the criteria. The Commission can choose to delete the criteria and let the council have the final authority, or the wording could be reversed to say that the Commission R may disapprove the detailed plan if it finds . . . The .itent is to project what the Commission will be looking for. Mr. Engelbrecht asked about substantial compliance. Mr. Morris replied that it does leave some discretion. For example if a street should be 30 feet wide and it is 29, would that be substantial compliance? ; Mr. Robbins said that the term 'tsubstantial compliance" makes the difference between the old PD ordinance and the proposed new one very minimal, r Jesse Coffey, 3513 Grenada Trail, asked if the new process will apply to PDs zoned before May 20, 1986, and in fact to all PDs. Mr. Robbins said yes. Mr. Coffey asked if approved PDs will have to come back to the city to gat the same zoning. Mr. Robbins said that if their site plans do not have all the information required in the new ordinance they would have to come back. 2-3 s ~n yXLaA 7 P&Z Minutes NAFT January 9, 1991 Page 14 Mr. Coffey said that he just wants to make sure that anyone that has a PD or is proposing a new PD will have to meet the same requirements. Mr. Robbins said that everybody can use the new process. Each PD is different and some of the old PDs have more detail than others. Mr. Coffey tried to clarify that the new ordinance would not benefit one group. He asked if old PDs will have to start o^sr. Mr. Robbins replied that they might have to submit and pay fees if they do not have enough detail. Some of them will have it others won't. If they don't have all the information, then they would at least have to get a detailed plan approved. Staff would have to look at the existing PD and see what stage of the three step process the old PD is at. Less information will be required to get approval at the City Council level. Mr. Coffey said that to be fair, the City should let all the old PDs come up to new requirements for free within a given 1 period of time. Mr. Robbins explained that the new ordinance is less restrictive than the one that was approved in 1986. Mr. Appleton said that it seems wrong to charge everyone ; $1000 regardless of what they are doing. Mr. Robbins said that the city cannot have a sliding scale fee. The line has to be drawn somewhere. ; Mr. Appleton said that he thinks Mr. Coffe 's suggestion a good idea. Y is JJI Mr. Robbins said that it would be a problem to contact all 1 the PD owners. Mr. Morris commented that the City is not changing what was required in 1986 and the 1986 ordinance applied to all prior PD8. Mr. Coffey noted that he has had a difficult and lengthy time getting zoning. Everyone should be treated and charged the same. I 2-4 t • CT41A'L j 1 1 i P&Z Minutes Jan January 9, 1991 Page 11; DRAFT Ron White of the Perot Group, 12377 Merit Drive, Dallas, utated that conceptually the amendment appears to be a good idea that benefits all parties and landowners of all sizes. It takes a length of time to develop land and the proposal gives flexibility. It is hard to have footprints of buildings up front. He favors the amendment. i Ms. Brock closed the public hearing. She moved to add an amendment to the ordinance that if 20/4 of the landowners G within 200 feet of a zoning protest the zoning, then City Council approval should be required. Mr. Engelbrecht asked her to define protest. Ms. Brock defined it as a written petition. Mr. Kamman seconded the motion. Mr. Appleton asked if the approval would automatically go to the Council. Mr. Robbins said that the Commission would make a recommendation to the Council which would approve by majority vote. Motion carried (6-0). Ms;. Brock clarified that the petitioner can choose to use one, two, or three steps to do a PD. The first two steps could be merged in the third and Council action would be required. If the Council approves stage 2, then the P&2 could approve stage 3. Letting the developer choose the process is a virtue. She is concerned about doing away with the development schedule, but the schedules have not really worked anyway. It may work better to have development begin within 24 months once the detailed plan is approved. It the detail plan expires, then the other two steps would still be in place. She said that the new process should be available to everyone and is a good improvement. She moved to recommend approval of the proposed ordinance with the amendment made by the Commission. Seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht are. unanirously carried (6-0). 2-5 III it 'c f i i i DATE: 01/~2j2/91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 041 TO, Mayo[ and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager y1J SUBJECT: DISCUSS PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE CONCEPT MAP OF THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO PROVIDE FOR THE EXPANSION OF THSS SPECIAL PURPOSE ACTIVITY CENTER AND AMENDING THE BOUNDARIES OF INTENSITY AREAS It 91 4 10, 95, 105, 107, 109, 110 and 111 of APPENDIX A RECOMMENDATION: ~ J The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval (5-01. SUMMARY: The 1-35W corridor Is attracting greater prominence. A large site on the west side of 1-35W was considered for the Matsushita project last year, The Texas Enterprise zone also includes large tracts of land along the I-35W corridor. It is proposed to extend the Special Purpose Activity Center to include a site south of Hickory Creek between Highway 377 and 1-35W. The area west of the I-35W Is characterized by large flood plains and large tracts under one f ownership. The Inclusion of these tracts into designated Intensity areas is essential to implement the policit% of the Denton Development Plan, It is proposed to delineate intensity area #110 and amend the boundaries of Intensity areas I1, 90 10, 107, 109 and 111. (See attached staff report and maps.) i BACKGROUND: i Since the Denton Development Plan was formulattl and adopted in 1988, the Alliance Airport Development has accelerated the s development potential of lands along the 2-35W corridor, The proposed expansion of the Special Purpose Activity Center will facilitate the zoning and marketing of the Site. The proposed f amendments to the intensity area boundaries will promot4I the planning and development of lands in that area in accordance with the policies in the Denton Development Plan. V PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: N/A l; I City Council Report January 22r 1991 ; Page 2 ' I t r FISCAL ~ PACT: f. N/A 4.Respec ully sutmitted: Har ell Prepared by. City Manager u N~ Harry P Gaud, AICP Senior Planner Appr ved. E r n H. Ro ns, AicP Executive D ector Planning and Development 3216s I E E i I i , i 4 i r i CwgY M~ arn~ i CITY of oiNTONJ 7WS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM i J DATE: January 160 1941 Denton City Council T0: FROM, Harry N. Persaud, AICpr Senior planner { DE SUHJEGTi AMENDING THE CONCEPT NAP OF THE DENTON DEVELOPMEN10PLAN TO pROVI 101, F THE SPECIAL pURpOSE ACTIVITY CENTER AND 1 FOR THE EXPANSI. THE ND BOUNDARIES Op APPENDIX INTENSITY AREAS lr 90' 95' 105# III Op { log, MEND 110 A 1996 deaigSpeo~e Special purpose 1 The Denton Development plan adopt¢~cCivitytCenter The ehhe Municipal Airport Area as a Special purpimaro ily to encourage and prom Activity Center is intended p the in the future. The cur rent boundaries of a of establishment of an industrial econcrnic base to serve as asaesua gross are ivity employment and economic Attachment 11. The center encomp lain. center are allow' on maP077 acres or 23.764 is in the flood P 4,533 acres of which 1, i Since the Denton Development plan was pform' the rominence a dto nattract a, Corridor corporat 1 } y Airport developments has likely rasit attract theta35Miand south east of southwest Denton or mixed use project. The a Japanese relocation or a major Mataushitar j Li I of pM 2449 had been considered early last year by electronic company. Department of Commerce approved two enterprise zones In June 1990, the Texas The boundaries of Zone I for Denton under the Texas Enterprise Zone Act. 2 The OWn ownere of these the 1-3 14 to include a large site between I extend south along f FM 2449 (See Attachment Iroximately 1,397 acres at tion of app on the tracts tgrawcts 377 in have Pethtitioned vicinity o the City for annexa coning this location with the objective of e8ni the netrat¢91c location of this site With Enterprise Zone designation and give and the land owners be attracted to locate here. In in the i-35W Corridor, !t is the expectation of the City development project may PTOprtate coning classification and aggressively that a major economic ..;der to establish the SP 1 1 611/566.8200 D/fW METRO 434.2529 A i Y? Denton City Council January 16, 1991 Page 2 market the site, staff is now proposing to add approximately 21744 acres to the Special Purpose Activity Center. Approximately 709 acres or 25.461 of this area is in the flood plain. In delineating the boundaries of the Special Purpose Activity Center, staff reviewed the criteria established by the Appendix A Task Force# with regards to physical features, location and shape of tract and land use compatibility. The proposed boundaries shown on map Attachment #3 are as follows: C North - Hickory Creeks East - The Railroad and Hwy. 377; South - Crawford Roads West - I-35W. The proposed expansion of the Special Purpose Activity Center will absorb low intensity areas 0101# 0102, 1103, and part of moderate activity center 195 and z 1105. i t The Western portion of the Denton Planning Area is characterized by large flood plains and large tracts under one ownership. Some of the large land owners have approached the Planning staff to discuss the future planning and development of their tracts. The Perot Group (TPG) and the Henry S. Miller Trust have submitted general concept plans and are currently pursuing annexation and zoning of l#367 acres east of I-35W. The New Market Group Southwest Inc. has met with staff about a large tract west of the TPG property north of Crawford Road. RMS Realty has been pursuing a General Development Plan for a 912 acre tract located in the southeast corner of Highway 156 and US Highway 380. The inclusion of these tracts into designated intensity areas is essential in order to implement the policies of the Denton Development Flan. Staff is now proposing to extend the western boundaries of the Denton Planning Area as shown on map Attachment #4. The expanded planning area will make it possible to delineate low intensity area 1110 to include the area north of Crawford Road and east of Florence Roads and to amend the boundaries for low intensity areas 01# 19, 010# 1107, #109, and 1111. Intensity calculations for these areas have been set up in LUMIS files !Attachment #5) as part of Appendix A, i The Planning and Zoning Commission considered these amendments to f.he Denton j Development Plan and voted 5-0 to recommend approval. ? t Henry NTPerseud wp Attachments: 1. Current boundaries of the Special Purpose A:tivity Center 2. Enterprise Zone 11 3. Proposed expansion of the Special Purpose Activity Center 4. Proposed Western Boundaries: Denton Planning Area 5. LUMIS files 39359 CURRENT BOUNDARIES ATTACHMENT 1 NORTH i ' '404- ~o~e `'rte l ~ , f I I ' 1 SPECIAL PURPOSE ACTIVITY CENTJR~ F ra cat ~o~0 1 s JS ' ~t tq~10M L F. W 1449 G nib 4 or,w M Sn ~J 1 li t, ATTACHMENT 2 Gaf I Ctf~~1F7E f MlT RSTATK 36 9.11 • ' •L I ~ ` Rµ fe4 I M 1 ~ II env ume 1 J r~ r L, III tL r ~ `VI . Vj fNTftfgT~Tfi I t*40 aampm W 0 •ei MENEM ATTACHMENT #3 I 1 LEGEND ftummWestern Boundary Special pur of Study Area ose Activity 1 I~ ` Enterprise Zone Center 1 1 0'14OProposed Loop 288 y j - I 1 ♦ II DENTON 1 • ~ it ~ I .1 \ ~ 1 p ~*'1~ r X01/11.' _j _t ..46= f -_I i v1 ~A i. 3 44 , j Y t, t . wif I t. I, t f ATTACHMENT 4 EXIST. STUDY AREA BOUNDARY r ~j r r r r gip OF OTUDY REA Y i • • I ~ i Y 1173 I 1.. KAU~! a♦ • • EXIST. STUDY BOUNDARY 10 • 1 • • • V+;. 9 ' Nw 300 18 • • ~ PROPOSED BOUNDARY • • • • 1 OF STUDY AREA 15 : 112 • • • z ; :r 113 I ! 1tao. ~ _ PROPOSED BOUNDARY • iii.pi~ i OF STUDY AREA • -......v ~.r,~1 i 107 • 108 • ~ 109 ~ . ~ --~-i www FM 244 • • h~ • • ' 105 ~~1 • i I 110 b j • 'S AREA ~,eOUNDARY • • PROPOSED BOUNDARY 95 OF STUDY AREA 000RTrt9E 0 • off I A\ 1 -srT I \ C q eS e ~ T.T. } ATTACHMENT 5 ,I LAND USE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION 3YSTEM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMEN'T' DEPARTMENT CITY OF DENTON r----------------------------------- i Intensity area 4: 1 Types Low Intensity trips/Ac 60 { Traffic survey zones: 6693 ! Boundary Description: North: AT i SF Rail Road South: Ganzer Road Date: 11/15/90 East: I 35 u West: AT A Sr Rail Road .....................r......--» -----rl----------------------------...! S LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS CATEGORY UNITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY ACRES UNITS INTENSIT j 1 r--....... SF-16 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SF-10>16 9 3.25 90 0 0 0 0 0 1 SF-7>10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i LESS SF-7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MOB.NOMES 5 0.75 50 0 0 0 0 0 DUPLEX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MF-R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MF-142 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COM/RET 0 2.5 1625 0 0 0 0 0 OFFICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INDUSTRY 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSTIINAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PARKS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 j R/0/SPACE 0 0 0 97.36 0 0 0 0 TRANSPORT 0 175.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 } AGRIC. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VACANT(*) 0 2094.7 0 1997.34 ---+0_ - 0....----0- 0 TOTAL 14 2260.6 1765 2094.7 0 0 0 0 .........---rrr............. ti.r......... INTENSITY CALCULATIONS (1) Intensity area total trips 2280.8 times 60 136848 (2) Trips allocated to existing land uses (built) 1765 i + (3) Trips allocated to current zoning incl. P Ds (not built) 0 (4) Trips allocated to vacant lands not toned plus AQric. zoning 119840 (5) Estimated unallocated intensity trips (1)m1nus(2)+(3)+(4 15243 (6) Percentage of intensity trips allocated 89 -rr .................r..........--------.................r....................... Note: Vacant land under current zoning represent areas outside the city limits with no toning , z j a ( j LAND USE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM I PLANNING AND DEVELOPlLW DEPARTMENT i CITY OF DENTON Intensity area 0: 9 Type, Traffic survey zones: 6696A . Low Intensity trips/Ac 60 Boundary Description: North: ETJ line for the City of Krum Date: it South: US HWY 380 /15/90 East; Egan Road and Radecks Road West: FM 156 rJ EXISTING LAND USE - - LAND CATEGORY USE UNITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY ACRES PLANNED UNITS LINTENSIT SF-16 < SF-10>16 13 13 130 0 0 0 SF-7>10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l 0 0 0 0 0 Q LESS SF-7 p 0 0 0 0 0 0. MOB-HOMES O 0 0 0 - 0 DUPLEX 0 0 0 0 Q 0 MF-R 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 MP-162 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COM/RET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OFFICE 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 INDUSTRY 0 0 0 0 0 ~ INSTIONAL 0 2.5 212.5 0 0 0 0 PARKS 0 0 R/0/SPACE 0 293.45 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRANSPORT 0 0 0 0 0 AGRIC. O 61.18 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.45 0 0 0 0 p i VACANT(fl 0 654 0 0 0 0 0 654 0 0 0 0 f rr_.r__r-_r_r-,-rrrrrrr__rrr-_rrrr r---------u.......... 3 TOTAL 13 1046.58 343 654 t 0 0 0 f INTENSITY CALCULATIONS (1) Intensity area total trips 1046.56 times (2) Trips allocated to existing land uses (built) 60 62795 (3) Trips allocated to current zoning inol. P Ds (act bilt)oning 340 (4) Trips allocated to vacant lands not zoned plus Agric. z 39240 (5) Estimated unallocated intensity trips (i)minus(2)+(3)+(4 23212 (6) Percentage of intensity trips allocated r----63 Note: Vacant land under current zoning rr,present areas outside the city limits with no zoning 5-2 r ti 9 i r. r, LAND USE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF DENTON i 60 Intensity area to Type: LOW intensity trips/ac Traffic survey zones: 6696 6697E Boundary Description: North: FM 1173 G:. South: Jackson Road Date: 09/20/89 East: Lovers Lane West: Dry Fork LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING PLANNED DEVEIAPHENTS j CATEGORY UNITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY ACRES UNITS INTENSIT -rrrr----..rwr....--------------------------------r....----.r..w r SF-16 < 68 59.54 830 0 0 0 0 0 SF-10>16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SF-7>10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LESS SF-7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MOB.NOMES 21 4.5 210 0 0 0 0 0 DUPLEX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MF-R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MF-102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COM/RET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OFFICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INDUSTRY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSTIINAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PARKS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R/o/SPACE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRANSPORT 0 31.64 0 17.21 0 0 0 0 AGRIC. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E VACANT 0 1074.09 0 834.76 0 0 0 0' ..........wr.rr...---.r ..................r..rrrrr..rr..r.r.rrr................w. ,TOTAL 104 1182.91 1040 1074.09 0 0 0 0 .......................rr..------------r.------......--.---- INTENSITY CALCULATIONS i (1) Intensity area total trips 1182.91 times 60 70975 j it (2) Trips allocated to existing land use 10,40 (3) Trips allocated to current zoning incl. P Ds (not built) 0 (4) Trips allocated to vacant lands not zoned plus Agric. zoning 63413 (5) Estimated unallocated intensity trips 1)minus(2)+(3)+(4) 6522 (6) Percentage of intensity trips allocated 91 ..r...........rrrrr...r..rwr.....r..rr..........r 5-3 i r I r r 11 , LAND USE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF DENTON intensity area 95, Type: Moderate intensity trips/Ac 350 Traffic survey zones: 6727 Boundary Description: North: Refer to guidelines in Appendix A South: Date: 12/04/90 East: West: Cc LAND USZ EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS CATEGORY UNITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY ACRES UNITS INTENSIT SF-16 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SF-10>16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SF-7>10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LESS SF-7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MOB.HOMES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DUPLEX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MF-R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MF-1&2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COM/RET 0 0 0 0 0 17.28 0 11232 OFFICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INDUSTRY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSTI'NAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PARKS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R/0/SPACE 0 0 0 7.8 0 0 0 0 1 TRANSPORT 0 0 0 11.46 0 0 0 0 AGRIC. 0 7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 VACANT 0 44.04 0 7.5 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 51.54 0 26.76 0 17.28 0 11232 INTENSITY CALCULATIONS f (1) Intensity area total trips 51.54 times 350 18039 (2) Trips allocated to existing land uses (built) 0 (3) Trips allocated to current zoning incl. P Ds (not built) 11232 (4) Trips allocated to vacant lands not zoned plus Aqric. zoning 2625 j (5) Estimated unallocated intensity trips (1)minus(2)+(3)+(4 4182 (6) Percentage of intensity trips allocated 77 ------------------------------------------•r................. ONE THIRD RULE CALCULATIONS Acres Trips (1) Allocations for com\ retail development 17.18 11167 (2) Existing com\retail land uses (built) 0.00 0 (3) Current zoning for com\retail land uses 17.28 11232 (4) Total allocated (2) + (3) 17.28 11232 (5) Unallocated trips/acres -0.10 -65 5-4 r `y\\ r 1 1 i' , k LAND USE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF DENTON Intensity area 105 Type: Moderate Intensity tripe/Ac 350 Traffic survey zones: 6715 Boundary Description: North: Refer to guidelines in Appendix A South: Date: 12/04/90 East: West: i LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS 4 CATEGORY UNITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY ACRES UNITS INTENSIT r" SF-16 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SF-10>16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SF-7>10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LESS SF-7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MOB.HOMES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DUPLEX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 I MF-R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MP-162 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COM/RET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OFFICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INDUSTRY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSTItNAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PARKS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R/0/SPACE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRANSPORT 0 0 0 11.47 0 0 0 0 AGRIC. 0 0 0 8.25 0 0 0 0 VACANT 0 31.47 0 11.75 0 0 0 0 M---M TOTAL 0 31.47 0 31.47 0 0 0 0 INTENSITY CALCULATIONS (1) Intensity area total trips 31.47 times 350 11015 (2) Trips allocated to existing land uses (built) 0 (3) Trips allocated to current zoning incl. P Ds (not built) 0 (4) Trips allocated to vaunt lands not zoned plus Agric. zoning 7000 (5) Estimated unallocated intensity trips (1)minus(2)+(3)+(4 4015 (6) Percentage of intensity trips allocated 64 ti ONE THIRD RULE CALCULATIONS Acres Trips (1) Allocations for com\ retail development 10.49 6819 (2) Existing com\retail land uses (b%:ilt) 0.00 0 (3) Current zoning for com\retail land uses 0.00 0 (4) Total allocated (2) + (3) 0.00 0 (5) Unallocated trips/acres 10.49 6819 } E 5-5 r r 6 LAND USE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF DENTON Intensity area is 107 Types LOW Intensity trips/Ac 60 Traffic survey zones: 6702 Boundary Descriptions North: Jim Christal Road Souths FM 2499 and boundaries for Mod. area 1108 Date: 11/15/90 East: Hickory Creek West* C. Wolfe Rd. LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS CATEGORY UNITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY ACRES UNITS INTENSIT SF-16 < 13 13 130 0 0 0 0 0 SF-10>16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SF-7>10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LESS SF-7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 MOB.HOMES 5 2.5 50 0 0 0 0 0 DUPLEX 0 f, 0 0 0 0 0 0 MF-R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t4F-1&2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COM/RET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OFFICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INDUSTRY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSTIONAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PARKS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i R/0/SPACE 0 670.42 0 0 0 0 0 0 { TRANSPORT 0 44.75 0 68.72 0 0 0 0 AGRIC. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VACANT(*) 0 1454.34 0 1385.62 0 0 0 0 ` • .........................................--------•..----------r....---------...... i j.. TOTAL 18 2185.01 180 1454.34 0 0 0 0 P INTENSITY CALCULATIONS l i - k (1) Intensity area total trips 2185.01 times 60 131101 (2) Trips allocated to existing land uses (built) 180 (3) Trips allocated to current zoning Incl. P Ds (not built) 0 (4) Tripe allocated to vacant lands not zoned plus Ayyric. zoning 83137 (5) Estimated unallocated intensity trips (1)minus(2)+(3)+(4 47783 (6) Percentage of intensity trips allocated 64 ...........-r.r..... ..............................................r.............. (*)Note: Vacant land under Current Zoning represents vacant land outside city limits 5-6 1 i I 1 A E i " f i r' ' 1 i 1 1 Uli ff 4 .~yy 1.,~ ,~.i n 1 t t ye i. 1 f f . !r i f, f r ,t17 ~jt S •I~, Ir r'u.'1. ~Jy tiff ,1,; ~l M fl A • f' (t " ' I I~ 5~ ri 1,i ; y 1"4 A 1 Y T f ! e { 1 l 1 Olt t rl f Ir 1 a 'i - v p a d l~;4h°I f'r;ll .j~ r X1»1 I r.4 Z 1 I, f , f'y ~ I~i ~A !'f,V yy ~y Irk Y~s . I I' ~ 'y r • ~ 1 , I` , 1 } ~ 3 ~ ~ f 4.4 _ II c 1~`14L. Y4 1# 1 r~~ _ I +11 1 t f1.J' ~I Or z ~ ~'1 N ~ 1. Yv. f f: n • L . 1i 1 I! 1 r I t ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ r I y 'rc~ II , Y " t } Y { 4 ~ ~ ~I~ jLi v S T' ^ I 1 ' ( A ~ ~ 1 / ~ f i 15 A I I f {~e T 1 r F. rl I r Yf . r , n a 1. 'At 4 , Y f u r n I ~I ASNOON ~0~OLE' Chi ACH Ty, 1910, E,O:WNIVERSII , ~ s el a Fi DENT Nt TEXAS 762011, II ~ , , • 44, k d" Y raC t+7 / r T i i l~ f 'E, .t t. t. .5:~.. n r h I A 1 eA,f 3 It . did r~ ~ { I t,; rf ~~inf .I y om;wm j a It, t P Ft>- G- 1 r T fem. {.r ~I L ` ~4F 11 't i 17 t r 40 y Z . A f ` ~ k~, ' A • ~ ''r ~l r ~ ~ / My,3 ,rte. r ^ ..T , J'.w Or z i -for 4~ t ~ 1 ~'~"`rw INf}If 1~ f, ylr~. it I ^^I! 1 } 1 h T. a. Ot nu~r~.~rrr~r'•• V .n J7411 ~k { ' r P ~ ~ 10 1 ~Ir11 /IIII~ MInM 4. Gh + f ^ , r• ~ r m al"r Now W~ pow f 1 M 1b )w' ' rv~T a 1 I ~ Irk ~ h, f• i 1 ' Yy A ~ Iti~l t o y e i~ i y 1Y~ A^ y II/ EXTEW10H We I t 1~I SEOWIA PAW. yif ' CAds As SIIDE 40 rlgl 'V i _ _ w r. _Ir ' Zt ar , ~1~1 f + t: Is 4 _ 1 } •y Vii. t I'' I .d .w I -  NOTESi NEVADA, ' •h , I' III EASTERNMOST EXISTING DRIVEWAY ON UNIVERSITY OR'. IaSITY DAIV ~Ott r r..a►0 ~ b~ ill y ~ ~ j I } ~m41 110~EM~l~ut SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER THE NOTTINGHAM DRIVE EX' IS,OPlNEOf ,o. (E) ALL SITE DRAINAGE FROM LOT 1R MUST STAY ON THE BE DISCHARGED INTO THE PROPOSED PUBLIC SYSTEM INYTALLEO ON NOTTINGHAM ABOUT 50 TO 100 FEET S LOT I R, 131 NO MAJOR CHANGES IN EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY ARE PR ,r - _ { 4 a- D, - Found 1/2" Reber F12ODPLAIN MRNA Monument. NO PART OF THIB TRACT A0EAN$ Ti ROW Ai0ht~df"Wey -r SIp W Set ACC tK fO THE NATIONAL FLOOC z Pantie1/2" Reber AN APIA DESIGNATED AS -A FLOOD N M M ~ i NSURANCe AATI 4 B AN FLODD . X Y OR DENTON,' OENtOII ~ M - 2l eDtl~i o.Lin Line . ~gMMt1t1ITYa0ANEL KWEA 4$019 ~Ir... Telephone Linn MH Manhole DATED Aukrt 4, 19671 Pp Power, Pole TMtfl A pOtN1 Net.IMNLY 61 ~r - - ~ LP M Light p018 ro tw..aow 1 . _ r FN Fire Nydr~smt eot ,r Center- Line ` DaLom BUil0ho Line Nil '~w eaui~ utilitysetpt, communi0etions Bpsmt, i IDIOM" 1 w r. 1 a: r l a l , i~ U f t. S i. y • l 145 ' P - d ws lit, u+„y,x.ty Ji„ar~,MiM.,V'~.eN'..,~.1tRXIN.K'ir{Z 'yGt ,an r !~c ins, t d nTr , v.,t„P.83'Aavt,k+'Y tll^P,R~~r:.`e4`'le~e~~5~3~.YriF~d~'~~d,A+'! 'm~4~~ k r..,». ti 3 +ri~ ~ . ~,za.,.vav~AdP+Ytdrlxe,.3:5+~' GLNB~sY.;~:rr~~~.v;xPtir'fl6w>a~W~~v~11 i ~s..vnx._.o Y3 iy a.f IxsAeSBJ[...ri~ " - `~r ~ y~ r 1' 'tu.N,~. u2Ye..Isi.aB~uYu.'a' S1~&a4ii.18.iGrUaAbaV5a7~{JV~S>.~1aC~'~ti~'d!a YC~`Gi~.NU`YY1.:, Wv.~.kL ,k,.~:a,. k'~. ;R 1 ti ' POP lore "Lot" ~A 10ILDINO 1Ox~1~ 6~o.g5~ ad ` WALL W HOPWiS UALL DIY %.oNT WIN _ ~ nil i rrr~~ m i~~rwr~~~rr~ar.. ~ • ` .I Mf 10 r 180TZON AT VOLTS Mu NAT 1 ►II1 MY1 IDILDINO DO1'~~ LOORINO NORTH I I s J~- 12'9 , Of view "CORAIRI'm p~,y RI/ID/MlW, `QI 7•. ~)9] nt Mrs 19I I" i !fir, r 106 i rk m r~ INOTIOM aT NOtfN /RO„RTY Lq u _ **n nor 1I D1 102 101 WOLFE NURSERY , i I I NIft DROpNBTM ' NLLL f l r,~ M~ bTs OiLDIiNi f ra RNIA 1NlIRL Igor av, ' b \Ta- r i I 1 ' u u.c r 61012011 At NOR" MPSMTV L 103 NORly no 1104 LI  ~%W 1w con d , Was. Tsxa 70410 414/433-32$5 ' I mm It lolt-\A f 7. r- we w1111*111z&sa PA wA n k, > S DA, ~J PO-30 ~L_._., i ~ rr P i T ~rrrrrrr rrrrrrrr ~,1 ITEM rr. N ~0 O ~ s~ Pa•s 04 % o Q r , 1✓trrrr 04, rY~/l ~I 0111 OF UNION, 1ItAt U.1,1, VICINITY MAP 103 6- IIANNRI IlNtltr .ttttttttttttttt~ IKTA o u+AwiiiNAUtro 1- ~ k ' ! RAW AAfAI M I N lktactt LANDSC, tPING LEGEND loot AID A~ ! MIA, All OtAlllAR AO M: AL: y`,II„ ^ - r p~+ ICAVICt AREA: M-1 BERMUDA SOS 1 IARCt: TREE p . AlllUllVI40IINNlUEO I 1001140 ARIAS A-RE 90AEEN1N0 d SMALL SHRUB oultolmal~ 1,11 A r , TREE RRAIl1 ( ItAVIII ANtAt a totAL OUII01N0 AAUP 1 " PARKING Aloulkuthii FLAN` LIS`T - _ ~ fAAOINt RIQVIRl01 RETAIL loo ,f y JlAflt IOTAMICAL NAML 001111tlM1 NAM ' 1 IAAIREAS I.P. JIN1 W uYUyJi ' YIRAVA {r0I SpA tillai 6.0. RfAMr1 i111M11Y HOME TATS ONOUND, OYNODON BERMUDA SOD 1 VdClllttl 6.f, 12 X 14 OONL OR 12 0.0. REF1 IOIA1 AAAAINt NIp11RIO; m C SWARES 00441 YO OSC, 101 rain rAAUNa florloto; IARCE QUERCUS BUR OAK t' CAI, M-20 AT R" WiltfFlNO RIOOIAANINtI tfr,A f.Af TO RrAtr VAAe ipgtlAllNil tRtt MACROCAW WATURlTY DETAIL 101 6141tt VAAO AAIA LAN0ICA01Nt IIQUINto AT IoM LA44CAPINO INOVmto 1i . ➢I i L 1 SCK((NNO QUERCU! s"AR6 4 OAL 30-0 AT RM TO fatty ItQUltlo rt ~ c ~ TRtt 9HUMARDII OAK MATURITY DETAIL 101 1 ft o I'10I 1.01 Of 110111 MAD rl DWARF 1 OAL Y.0" T ° Rip TO tAfARtlw Nd t AJletINO AI WlRlCSIID r lIIMN! EVfORD MOLLY MATURI DE"fAIL 101 luau INI f ovl lot 10,014 IOtAI LWItAAIM Of WOW OIAI LANDIC40I G PRIMED: Si PLANT LIST AND LANDSCAPING L 'GEND 1102 ARE-A, L~ J fi ti~r~t $r~~.~~bE .t~ i yx ~i41 a e W4 r, xr un, r ,9: ntiA 'y r. _n8'{ f5t fi rx.ia a .f ~L I i u~ J I 1~ ~ Fy_ a' r g y i AI I I LAND USE MANAGEMENT INFOPXATION SYSTEM PLANNING AND DEO DEMENT DEPARTMENT CITY r_intansity trips/ac 60 .wra.r...r..r .LOW Intensity area 109 6 14A 6703A North Jim Christal Traffic sDescription' zones: Boundary Southt Lively Road Date! 11/15/90 East% C. Wolfe Road Wasti PH 156 and the ETJ line of the City of Ponds r.. .......r.r..r.....r....r..a..r....r . .r .....a . . .....r..a....... LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS CATEGORY UNITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY ACRES Vt1IT8 IlfTENSIT e.. .r... r.r.....r.r....rr. r. r.rrr..r..... Ow.r. 0 0 0 ..r.r..r.rr.ar..r....r.. 1 A SF-16 < 16 L0 160 0 p O 0 p 0 0 SF-10>16 0 0 O p p 0 0 SF-7>10 0 0 0 0 0 0 LESS 87-7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M08.HOMES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DUPLEX 0 MF-R O 0 0 0 0 0 4'' O 0 MF-1i9 0 0 0 0 0 0 p COM/RET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OYFICE 0 1 105 0 0 0 0 WDUSTRY 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSTI'NAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PARKS 0 0 639.43 0 0 0 0 R/0/SPACE 68 0 0 0 TRANSPORT 0 4754 0 0 0 0 AGRIC. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VACANT(*) 0 369341 0 3695.91 .r~.rr..r .............rr.r.r....... 7 rr........rr.O.rr.r...o--------Orr...rrrO 1. TOTAL 16 4590.16 265 693.91 .rrrrr.r..rr...rr..rr..rrrrrr.r..r.rrw.r...rrrrrr..rrr.rr.r..rr..r.rrrr...r...r. INTENSITY CALCULATIONS .r.rarr.r.r.r...rrrrr.r (i) Intsnsity area total tripps 4590.18 times 6o 975460 _ Trips allocated to existing land use 917513 3 Trips 81104atad to current toning incl. P Ds (not built) 4 Tri s allocated to vacant lands not coned piui)minus(9)+(3)+(4) 57619 (5) to lated unallocated intensity trips i (6) Percentage Of intensity trips allocated Notafrvacant rlandsrunder current toning represents Vacant areas ....r....r. outside the city limits. 5-7 } f r LAND USE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM PLANNING A.D DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF DENTON Intensity area is 110 Types Low Intensity trips/Ac 60 Traffic survey zones: 6715 Boundary Description: North: FM 2449 and Lively Road South: Crawford Road Dates 11/15/90 East: I 35 W r West: Florence Road } ..........r ..............r................................................ LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS CATEGORY UNITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY ACRES UNITS INTENSIT ..r........._.......r_........................ SF-16 < 19 19 190 0 0 0 0 0 SF-10>16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SF-7>10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f LESS SF-7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MOB.NOMES 47 32.5 470 0 0 0 0 0 DUPLEX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MF-R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MF-162 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COM/RET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OFFICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I INDUSTRY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSTI►NAL 0 1 85 0 0 0 0 0 PARRS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R/0/SPACE 0 903.85 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRANSPORT 0 104.96 0 0 0 0 0 0 AGRIC. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 VACANT(*) 0 5875.66 0 5673.56 0 0 0 r r.r... ........rrr_..... •--.........r_._...r-r._....... _ r TOTAL 66_.6936_87 r- .745 ....6876_500 6........0......r.0.....r_r~rr---__rO INTENSITY CALCULATIONS (1) Intensity area total trips 6936.87 times 60 416212 1 (2~ Trips allocated to existing land uses (built) 745 , (3 Trips allocated to current toning incl. P Ds (not built) 0 ; (4) Trips allocated to vacant lands not Boned plus Aggric, toning 352634 (5) Estimated unallocated intensity trips (l)m1nUs(2)+(3)+(4r 62934 (6) Percentage of intensity trips allocated 96 0.00 (0) :Vacant aland n under current toning represent areas outside the city limits 5-8 LAND USE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM PLANNING AND DEVEIAPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF DENTON Intensity area 1s 111 Typos Low Intensity trips/Ac 60 Traffic survey tonesa 6701 i Boundary Descriptions Northa US HWY 380 Southa Jim Christal Road Uates 11/15/90 Easta Egan Road West$ FM 156 S .r..r......+.r....rr-rrrr-rrrrrrrrrr r...... r..... .q LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING PLANNED DEVEL40PHENTS CATEGORY UNITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY ACRES UNITS INTENSIT ...................rrrrrr......................rrrrr SF-16 < 2 2 20 0 0 0 0 0 SF-10>16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SF-7>10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. LESS SF-7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MOB.HOMES 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 DUPLEX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MM-R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HF-1i2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COM/RET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OFFICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INDUSTRY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSTIINAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PARKS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 } R/0/SPACE 0 148.52 0 0 0 0 0 0 r TRANSPORT 0 61.18 0 0 0 0 0 0 f AGRIC. 0 0 0 637.75 0 0 0 0 VACANT(*) 0 737.06 0 99.31 0 0 0 0 rrrrr-------------------rrrrrr--r---r-----------------------------r--rrrr rrrr......... TOTAL 2 949.76 20 737.06 0 O I' rrrrrr.............. r......rrrr-r...r..........................r..~r O 0 INTENSITY CALCULAVIONS r--r (1) Intensity area total trips 948.76 times 60 669266 0 (2) Trips allocated to existing land uses {built) 20 (3) Trips allocated to currant toning inola P Ds (not built) (4) Trips allocated to vacant lands not toned plus Agric. toning 44224 (6 Estimated unallocated intensity trips (i)m nus(2)+(3)+(4 12682 (6 Percentage of intensity trips allocated rrr.........rrrr..-................rrrr-......r....... the Notes Vacant wland nunder current zoning represent areas outside 5-9 i t{ra, Vaa x:< t i ATTACHMEI3T 6 p&Z Minutes 1990 December 12, page 3 r Recommendations Ms. Feshari stated that staff recommends approval with the condition that signs be in conformance with Article 170 B-Zoning. Ms. Brock asked about the 301 logo sign. Ms. Feshari said asdrainageoeasementifr ntingion ordinance. Loop 288 where 301 signs are allowed. Mr. mmn stated pr o bl lem being off of Colorado. created by are enteringr r:Ms. Feshari said that staff has worked on the design with the developer. moving s28 low Mr. Clark said that the ingress 8 is is Sol generallyfrom Traffic coming from mop 289. They should not have to because n the rise on Loop ir drive slow down much more to enter Arbyts. access, They are trying to intended to be a high speed avoid signalizing the Target entrance on Colorado. is an n elb internal t asked traffic hat t problem. will have to do if there t Mr. Clark said that there roblems and solutionsd with done. potential discussed noting ing that there is stacking room to keep the delays on the Arby's site. Chair closed tho public hearing. Deoisiont Mr. Glasscock noted that there are good points to the design that have been brought ut, olHe ho 012they will work. He moved to recommend approval Z-90-, was seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht and unanimously carried X6'01' the city kamendingc the recommendation Hold a public hearing withc regard to Development plan by expanding the boundaries of the epeolal 1 purpose Activity Center. 6-1 r s AI6veq 1~ 1 J! P&Z Minutes ' 9'- LS AFT December 12, 1990 Page 4 Staff Report: Mr. Persaud reported that in June 1990, the Texas Department of commerce approved of two Enterprise Zones for the City of Denton under the Texas Enterprise Zone Act. The purpose of the Enterprise Zone is to induce private investment in distressed areas by removing unnecessary governmental regulatory barriers. Mr. Persaud reviewed the boundaries of the enterprise zone with the Commission. The Matsushita project site considered earlier in the year is a proposed expansion of the enterprise zone. Because of the location, land owners feel that they could get a large corporation to locate there. They want to aggressively market the area. The proposed expansion of the Special Purpose Activity Center will absorb low intensity areas #1010 #102, and 1103, and part of Moderate Activity Center 095 and #105 as contained in Appendix A of the Denton Development Plan. Staff feels that the locations warrant the expansion and that the Fort Worth corridor will attract an economic base for future growth. Staff considered the factors looked at by the Appendix A Task Force such as physical boundaries, and Crawford Road which is the Denton/Argyle ETJ line. The recommended expansion looks like a large area but contains a lot of flooJ plain. He reviewed the boundaries of the proposed expansion with the Commission. Mr. Holt asked about the unnecessary government regulations. Why have them if they arc unnecessary? fl Mr. Persaud explained that it means for example, that tax rebateo could not be granted !f there was no enterprise zone. It removes barriers. Tht wording was taken from the Texas Department of Commerce. An enterprise zone is to encourage development in an arFa. Mr. Holt said that wording souids like developers might not need to abide by regulations. Mr. Robbins replied that the City is looking at removing barriers to zoning by amending the planned development (PD) process and adding planning areas. It is a continuing effort. Me. Brock asked how much control the City is giving up. ' Mr. Persaud answered that the City will continue to do zoning using the PDa which give site control. The sign ordinance and landscaping ordinance are also in effect. 'i 6-2 r.l w A 1 P&Z Minutes December 12, 1990 `IS FT Page 5 Mr. Holt asked what would happen if someone wanted to build homes in the area. Mr. Robbins said that the economic base would have to be protected from the residents. The onus would be on the residents to do buffering. The City is not considering a zoning case at this time. This discussion is about long j range planning for the future. This is a good site to develop as an economic base. The infra-structure number crunching was done when the site was considered for Matsushita. Mr. Engelbrecht clarified that intensity does not apply in the enterprise zone. Mr. Robbins said yes and waen people will be able to tell more easily what types of uses will be allowed. Mr. Holt asked if the City has made a lot of tax money from Texas Instruments. Mr. Robbins said yes. Industry is the main part of the tax I base. Mr. Engelbrecht asked if the expansion would create a desire } to expand along the other side of I-35 as well. i Mr. Robbins said that they will probably be looking at the west side of I-35. He is not sure a special purpose 1 activity center is needed up and down both sides of 135. 1 That issue lies in the future and is not being considered tonight. Ms. Brock said that industry can be more attractive than high density housing. Mr. Engelbrecht said that the special purpose activity center does not preclude that situation. Mikel Reynolds of Henry S. Miller Co. (HSM), 2001 Bryan Tower, Dallas, stated that they have owned the property for 18 yearsi They have had several light industry prospects J look at t. when they see it classified as low intensity they lose interest. The Donnley Company looked at it and then located in Midlothian. its stressed that they want good employers but the companies don't want to fool with intensity. In a few weeks, HSM will submit zoning 1 applications for a business park that will show industries i 6-3 I 1 1 fl SSyH~M1i P&Z Minutes ° !5 December 12, 1990 Page 6 the City's intentions. It will be used as a marketing tool. They do not anticipate high rise uses. 301 is flood plain. Recommendation: Mr. Persaud stated that staff recommends approval of the expansion. Chair closed the public hearing. Mr. Holt moved to recommend approval of the expansion of the ! Special Purpose Activity Center. Motion was seconded by Mr. Appleton and unanimously carried (6-0). IV. Hold a public hearing and consider making a recommendation s to the city Council with regards to amending the Denton Development Plan (DDP) by expanding the western boundaries of the Denton Planning Area and delineating intensity areas j j1, 9, 101 950 1051 107, 1091 1101 and 111 as part of Appendix A. i Staff Reports Mr. Persaud reported that the DDP considered a study area of approximately 144 square miles. Long range planning efforts will be looking toward the west. A framework time to wefor future stern boundaryiof the study area. Is the e western r ` portion of the Denton planning area is characterised by large floodplains and large tracts of land under one ownership. Some of the large landowners have approached the Planning staff to discuss the future planning and development of their tracts. The Perot (croup (TPG has prepared general. concept plans for areas west of I-35W and i s currently pursuing the annexation of 920.42 acres east of I-35W. The New Market Group Southwest, Ino, has met with { staff about a large tract west of the TPG property north of Crawford Road. RMB Realty has been pursuing a general southeastncorner of Highway 156 and U.S. Highway 3b0.~ Tthe he inclusion of these tracts into designated intensity areas is essential in order to implement the policies of the DDP. Staff is now proposing to extend the western boundary of the Denton planning area to include a larger area in Dentonts extra-territorial jurisdiction. The western boundary description is as followst i 6-4 t , 5~ ? 'V ~A~ II~~ f~i'n~ P&Z Minutes Dec IIR /ul F - fl December 12, 1990 J ~ 211y Page 7 "Beginning in the north at the intersection of Highway 156 and 1-35 and following Highway 156 south to Hopkins Road; then following Hopkins Road to the Denton/Krum ETJ line to Highway 156; then following Highway 156 south to the Ponder/Denton ETJ line to Florance Road; then following Florance Road south to Crawford Road and then following Crawford Road to Denton/Argyle ETJ Agreement ` line." The expanded Denton planning area will make it possible to delineate low intensity area number 110 to include the area north of Crawford Road and east. of Florance Road; and to redefine boundaries for low intensity areas number 1. 9, 10, 107, 109, and 11. The proposed expansion of the Spacial P areas urposed Activity center will absorb all of Low Intensity + #101, iand intensity area rboundaries. d He said that fr staff is recommending approval of the areas as delineated. No one was present to speak to issue. Chair closed the public hearing. It was moved by Mr, -uht and seconded by Mr. Appleton to delineate the planning area and intensity areas as recommended by staff and to amend the concept map to reflect the changes. Mr. Appleton said that he thinks it would be a good idea to communicate these changes with the property owners, Ms. Brock said that the expansion of the special purpose activity center should be a story in the newspaper. f Motion carried unanimously (6-0). J 6-5 F ti M DATE: 02/22/91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT ~ A TO: Maynr and Members of the City Council FROM. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY AND FINAL REPLATS FROM LOT 41, AND ADDITIONAL UNPLATT£D LAND: TO LOTS 41A AND 418, BLOCK no BELLAIRE HEIGHTS, PHASE FIVE RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval at its January 9, 1991 meeting (6-0). SUMMARY: ( C This is a 1.222 acre tract located on the cul-de-sac of Howard Court in the Bellaire Heights subdivision. BACXGROUND: The property was recently rezoned to single family (8F-,7) from agricultural and planned development toning, and single family residential development is anticipated. No structures exist on the site currently, and the applicant intends to preserve protected y trees whenever possible, during construction. Formerly, Lot 41 was approved for single family development In Planned Development 176, This acreage was added to approximately one acre of unplatted land to the north, yielding a proposal for home Bites of 6346 acres and .676 acres- The applicant proposes to construct his own home on the latter lot. City services and facilities, including water, gas, sanitary sewer, j telephone, electrical, and solid waste, are available. The I developer rill have to excavate the Howard Court paving in order to provide water service to the lots, The replat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations, I PROORAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: I ' None at this time. ' FISCAL IMPACT: Upon construction, there will be an Increase in the city's tax base, s I 1 r ,.I f f t Bellaire Heights, Phase Five January 22, 1991 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT= (Continued) Public improvements include approximately 107 linear feet of sidewalk and 165 ft, of communication easement. Re Pee ully submittede Prepared Dyi L loyd V, Harrell City Manager i d, Owen Yost, Urban Planner I Apr F . A b , AICP Executive Dir or Planning and 06volopment 2941g II~ i f i i j r e ATTACHMENT 1 y1 i how r AdYN? ' jI i r 1 ' [Bellaire Heightel preliminary i Final rnplate 1 s, ATTACHMENT 2 NIKO °f/ I ~ s AO 0 / r- + Lot i all cot 3 1 X83. a f Y 46- f + Jer Lot so X46 ' BLOCK 6 >a / <4A ANYSA All LANE F O • Y N w ~ j Lot Lot 0 JONI ;/344 4W IW . / 8 a la ~ I a~ a• 0 .a PA. I ut a s ter 30 gar so 101 • • KA .r own M / r~ r . • j let 11 • . i i i Pp Ior /a cot to i Lot o per la AID CONING ier 1 , r . j i rr_•~rrr_a.,r•rr~.rrryr~ w`w_r i i I ~ 1I D, r wa"~ t t ATTACHMENT 3 1 1 1 nMUtw trtr*Alw cf tpr , tof for , 4-r C.11. no in Tim N e7.31'504 y u n. j 103.62' ~ Z I~•--'-~~... tot 1! Lot Jo LOT 41A I \ c i 0.676 ACRES 1 lot 1 t ANYSA Lor „ LANE W ~ • i a5 t 1 • g 8 i l g u • ' LOf IS !3 l., tat u SLOCK 2 . LOT 410 I - ! 02,10,390 If .316 ACRES ma ,..qtr ' + , 0. rMr : I PO® i0 C.^• LAVO J ~L 10e.Do iof 00 lot JW for R• eo.oo• a 7rse'2e• E I~ A•122']e'17• 103.07• tot U Ch-N 76.16'34• E i 07.72• HOWARD t COURT er OLS.r. ; j a kl~ Lot a ; 1 I tot N LOr N LOf 11 : tOr N Lot !O I Ma i k ATTACHMENT 4 DRAFT Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission January 9, 1991 I The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas was held on Wednesday, January 9, 1991, at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 215 East McKinney, Denton, Texas. Present: Roy Appleton III, Euline Brock, Jim Engelbrecht, Ivan Glasscock, William Kamman, and Fran Morgan Absent: Judd Holt r Present from Staff: Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning and Development; Joe Morris, Assistant City C,; Attorney; Owen Yost, Urban Planner; Harry Persaud, Senior Planner; David Salmon, Engineering; Rick Svehla, Ac~sistant City Manager: Roger Wilkenson, Engineering; Karen Feshari, Urban Planner: and Olivia Carson, Secretary Chairwoman Brock called the meeting to order. I. Minutes It was moved by Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Ms. Morgan, and unanimously carried (5-0) to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of November 28, 1990. r VII. Consider the preliminary and final replats of Lot 41, Block B, Bellaire Heights, Phase 5, and unplatted land into Lots 41A and 41B, totalling 1.222 acres. { Staff Report. Mr. Yost stated that the applicant is proposing to divide the existing Lot 41 in PD-761 and one acre to the north, into two lots. Lot 41 was zoned for single family development as part of PD-76. This acreage was added to approximately one acre of unplatted land to the north, yielding a proposal for home sites of .346 acres and .876 acres. City services and facilities, including water, are,avsanitary sewer, ai able. The developer will rhave ~ to dex solid excavate sthe Howard Court paving in order to provide water service to the lots. Howard Court is a dead end and should only be closed for one day. Mr. Engelbrecht arrived at the meeting. i Recommendation: Mr. Yost said that the Development Review Committee recommends approval. 4-1 i i 1 1 _i r~ 4 4 P&Z Minutes January 9, 1991 Page 2 DR Ank 1 Motion was made by Mr. Kamman and seconded by Ms Moran to j recommend approval of the preliminary and f nal.replats of Bellaire Heights, Phase V. III. Consider a final plat of Lot It Block 1 of the Greenwich Village Townhome Addition. Staff Report: Mr. Yost reported that the tract is .45 acres located on Mingo Road approxiwately 300 feet northeast of Ruddell Street. The applicant will not utilize the 8" sewer line which partially fronts his proposes to serve the new structure via ant existingt4'a l~inee to be Department eenThe dged D veI pm nt adequate approval. cothe mmittee /recommends Mr. Appleton moved to a 1 of the Greenwich VillagevTownhmie Addition. Motionlwas i seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht and unanimously carried (6-0). 1 IV. Consider a general development plan of 18.468 %cres of land r on University Drive, east of its intersection with Shawnee and north of Mohican, owned by the Denton Bible Church. Staff Report: Mr. Yost reported that the tract is 16.468 acres located along University Drive. City services and facilities, including water, gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and solid waste, are available or planned for, to the proposed structures. The Development Review Committee recommends approval. Ms. Brock asked the status of the proposed extension of Nottingham. Mr. Yost answered that construction will begin this year but will not be complete until 1992. The layout is definite. 1 It was moved by Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Mr. Engelbr9o-ht and unanimously carried (6-0 to approve the general development plan for 18.468 acres owned by the Denton Bible ` Church. V. Consider the preliminary replat of the current Denton Bible Church Addition, plus additional unplatted land, totalling 9.578 acres located on University Drive north of Mohican. 4-2 1 } DATE: 01/22/91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Z-90-016 - A DETAILED PLAN ON 11.20 ACRES OF LAND RECOMMENDATION; The Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of Z-90-016 (6-0). SUMMARY: PD 16 has an approved Concept Plan for retail type uses. This is the first submission of a detailed plan on this site. PD-19 has an approved Concept Plan depicting the triangle tract as a 'service type' use. The city is working on a land swap of the triangle portion of PD-19 (including now abandoned right-of-way) for a 2.00+ acre tract on the western side of PD-16. - BACKGROUND: See History section of PAZ Report, PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Planning and Development= Aire Department, Library and citizens of Denton. FISCAL IMPACT: There are already funds available for the construction of the Fire Station. There are no funds available at this time to construct the library. This would have to be determined and established as part of the C,I.P, planning. ully subm t d eaI pared bys d Pre Llo d V. Harrell City Manager ;ar n K. P Shari Urban Planner Appr Robbi , AtCP Executive Director Planning and Development 2525x ti t , r `LYdX11Y1~ k Y PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Case No.: Z-90-016 Meeting Date: January 22, 1991 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: NCNB Texas National Bank P.O. Box 831500 Dallas, Tx 75283 City of Denton 215 E. McKinney Denton, TX 76201 Current Owner: Same Requested Action: Detailed Plan for portions of PD-16 and PD-19 for the purpose of a shopping center, public library, and firestation. Location and Size: 11.20 acres located at the southwest corner of Lillian Miller and Teasley Lane. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - PD-16 (Elementary School) South - PD-19 (Agricultural Use) East SF-10 (Bent Oaks Addition) West - PD-19 (Vacant) i Denton Development Plan: Low Intensity Area i SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: 1. 50 feet of Right of Way from centerline will be required on Teasley Lane and Lillian Miller. 2. A sidewalk will be required along the frontages of both Teasley Lane and Lillian Miller. t i I R4^N'Ny I Il f.,..,, nix sr~ (Case Z-90-016) Cg 2 it SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued) ! Utilities: Water is adequate for this site. An 8 inch sanitary sewer line will need to be extended from Bent Oaks across the frontage, past the property line and first drive entrance on Block 1, Lot B. Three to four additional fire hydrants will be required to meet 300 foot spacing requirements. This will be addressed during platting. The existing underground telephone lines as shown on the plat will be relocated by GTE sometime during September or r October, 1991, The exact relocation will be addressed I during the final platting of lots B and C. Drainage: i Two (2) drainage easements will be needed across the library and firestation site; one at the front of the property and one towards the rear tiering onto the existing drainage easement in Bent Oaks. The need for these storm sewers is created by the proposed retail site. The firestation and library site can surface drain into the existing easement in Bent Oaks. HISTORY On December 13, 1988 the City Council passed and approved Ordinance No. 88-205, an ordinance that corrected Ordinance No. 73-25 and 73-27, by amending those ordinances to provide for the correct designation of the 9.2 acre tract as a Planned Development Zoning District (PD-16) for General Retail Use. On August 19; 1986, the City Council passed Ordinance 86-164 which approved a revised concept plan for Planned Development 19 established by Ordinance No. 84-109. The Planned Development District reflects a mixed use development. The triangularly shaped tract is shown as part of the right-of-way at the intersection of Teasley Lane and Lillian Miller Parkway and contains approximately two acres of land. Recently, the City has been working with NCNB Texas National Bank to exchange the triangularly shaped tract for a tract located on the western side of PD-16 for the purpose of establishing a firestation as well as a public library, NCNB Texas National Bank is proposing a pad site on the 2,0 acre triangularly shaped tract. i „ r 4 (Case Z-90-016) Page 3 On January 9, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing on Z-90-016 and voted unanimously to recommend approval of this case (6-0). At the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on January 9, 1991, Mr. Jerry Cott spoke to the commission about an issue pertaining to PD-19 concerning an 8 foot tall wall along the southern boundary of PD-19, which abuts Mr. Cott's ' property. The commission discussed this issue with Mr. Cott, as did Mr. Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney. (Please refer to the minutes of the P&Z meeting.) Mr. Morris stated that a landowner is only required to meet the requirements of the ordinance, there are no requirements in the ordinance to build a wall. The commission decided this issue was not related to the detailed plan that was before them for a recommendation. In researching the verbatim minutes of the City Council on March 10, 1987, the Council determined that the wall would be an issue at the time the detailed plan for that particular area of PD-19 was submitted and that it was not appropriate to address the wall issue at the time of the concept plan stage. However, the Council requested a note in the minutes to address the wall issue at the time of the detailed plan stage. (Attachment 5 is a copy of these minutes for your convenience.) The area of PD-19 which abuts Mr. Cott's property is not related MM~ to, nor a part of, the detailed plan before the City Council. 1 FM 2181 separates the RNW Addition from Mr. Cott's tract. ANALYSIS The property is located in a Low Intensity Area. The majority of this site has already been zoned for general retail type uses; therefore, the intensity calculations for this tract have already been established for commercial/retail usage. The proposed detailed plan conforms to the Denton Development Plan. I RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-90-016. 1 J ti w' P 6~01 11 r (Case Z-90-016) Page 4 y~ r ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition with list of permitted uses. 2. Approve petition with additional conditions. 3. Deny petition. ATTACHMENTS C,- 1. Location Map/Reduced Copy of Detailed Plan 2. Table of Permitted Uses 3. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of January 9, 1991. 4. City Council Minutes of March 10, 1987 S. Ordinance 2SO3x { 1 i I 1 1 I 44 1 r ► 't t E 0'1 r• ~sI' rw ■ IMM •rI twYtiirti.•Il I 0 l~lw rwMa yrM1 ~r rM •rr Y.Y rN.n•~•1• ' rr. 14 rrw r. Yo..•... OrgrrA. M eb Iw y M •~M '.wr4 rr, IM r ~ awr•ry Y.rrrn• yr lw er I Yr • Yn wa..ar •n. rn ~ .wr awalrw r r.l f•n 1 w. • r R rm M.r. ~.Y~.. w.. wa • +aam Yrwra wyy rn, r r w .erl awr,rrwT• .r..r f...Y.. rxr rr. r 1w. w' :a ♦rr. f1r[ LJ IYy.y IwrwrYr~ 1•N• •.r 1[J~~M.rlweMr w►la a.r. F. rIrY►Y ry rYr i«u w~4Yrr YI JJ AAAAA [l[1■MTA11Y ACHM TRACT ra. rYwr MM law fr.nr y e n•r~...'..i •~w•r..••rY.wr..w..•«w I ro1410■M0 i!/ a I V1GfTYMAA, [r.• rr w r 1 lI~ 0 J 1Mn14rl ti. K'+ 11 N I 1 r ..r 1~ 1 ` ~n flwlea r~vrs ru M fOr1I ..F,,;,~..r`; r r, 1 .1 I 1 Irln [wp R«wr rr •N l ~~M • rl ,MAIM ±``a:H rMr I P", r'rFwl \Ir wlyer~ln~An~r sw.r 1 • r1 rrrl yY 14 Fwr r 1y. f1 ~J~.1.1 M r ~ / 1 I 1 Vn a ti.~lr Lar w f W + ' 1 M', ~ I 1 ~ ` :I I' r 1 ~K~ ti~ 1 S n r.•"~:w wow: wl • e. aM N •N I f • ~ {(Clio j3] f:7 ' r (~a w,Y~..1 1 M rN Iwl ~^~Z ~fl rr fMP~r ~~11Y 114 Ye1rrN '~11+' , I ~W•I AIM . - r. / Hoyt zo■ma IS IYw l,__JJ rwNlllr. 7,. 1 _ r.U MJ. wwM /wbo.oI awe y~y yL I~~ /rte. + My arN~ ~a! Y ~~_y~,wYr f ~"1 •y.,Iwrr~r~r m«r«.. r....• Wool ifA GLIr M_ONI~MI •ly •rrwa Y'I'.L~ir.r.... f. M•Jj!.~~rw~l Mr.lr r': rlw M.rY .I /~n~~~N'{I,~~IJJt~~v~/Y~[~rr~1.~•--' A ~~w Tell{ rnrr•Y ~n~~.•,1 ~ ~ ~Ij.r.41 A 1 V~Iw~~~ ~r ~ aa`M M Krr~r•Iila~l+l rflW .rr1N .Mrarw aw rf ~ FrYM IM r.F/ S~~rl ~ rr ~Ir r~ a w ti 1'^' r "~i"l~ Y r.Y..lr.wr+r. r` wrov. w wnl'~'7a1 ~1M~11.1MRlAy •.w.~r ~iwr.r ' t 'I 1i I J1I I ATTACHMENT 2 Z-90-016 1 TABLE OF PERMITTED USES RETAIL SALES ESTABLISHMENT: Any establishment wherein the primary occupation is the sale or rental of merchandise or goods in small quantities, in broken lots or parcels, not in bulk, for use or i consumption by the immediate purchaser. For the purpose of this Ordinance, however, retail sales establishments shall not be deemed to include mortuary or funeral parlor, off-premise sale of beer and ,,:ine, pawn shop, second-hand stores, used furniture or rummage sale, animal clinic or hospital with outside runs or pens. PERSONAL SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT: Any building wherein the primary occupation i, the repair, ;;are of, maintenance or customizing of personal prop sties that are worn or carried about the person or are a physical component of the person. For the purpose of this ordinance, personal service establishments shall include but need not be limited to barber shops, beauty parlors, pet grooming establishments, ailorsidresscleaning and other making shops shoe eleani g or repair shops, and other similar places of business. 1 OTHER PERMITTED USES ! Eating Establishments Day Nursery or Kindergarten School safe Deposit Boxes Public Library Business Schools Theater less than 500 seats ' Medical offices Financial Institutions Health Studios Travel Agency Auto Laundry Professional offices Fire Station or small Appliance Repair Shops Similar Public Auto Repair, inside only: A facility Safety Building for the repair and maintenance of Gasoline Service Station motor vehicles, but does not include rebuilding of engines or transmissions, or the restoring, painting or refinishing of auto bodies. j t i I~ 5. Y1 I ATTACHMENT 3 Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission January 9, 1991 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas was held on Wednesday, January 9, 1991, at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 215 East McKinney, Denton, Texas. , Present: Roy Appleton III, Euline Brock, Jim Engelbrecht, Ivan 11 Glasscock, William Kamman, and Fran Morgan Absent: Judd Holt Present from Staff: Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning and Development; Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney= Owen Yost, Urban Planner; Harry Persaud, Senior Planner; David Salmon, Engineering; Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager; Roger Wilkenson, Engineering; Karen Feshari, Urban Planner; and Olivia Carson, Secretary Chairwoman Brock called the meeting to order. I. Minutes It was moved by Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Ms. Morgan, and unanimously carried (5-0) to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of November 28, 1990. VI. Hold a public hearing and consider a planned development detailed plan and preliminary plat of an 11.19 acre tract in PD-16 and PD-19 for a shopping center, fire station, and public library on property located at the sou.hwest corner of Teasley Lane and Lillian Miller. Staff Report: Ms. Feshari stated that the detailed plan is for all of PD-16 and part of PD-19. Fifty feet of right-of- way from centerline and sidewalks will be required on Teasley Lane and Lillian Miller. Water is adequate for the site and an all sanitary sewer line will need to be extended across the frontage. On December 13, 1988 the City Council passed and approved an ordinance designating a 9.2 acre tract in PD-16 for general retail land use. This ordiran+:e corrected two 1973 ordinances that were done for PD-16. On August 19, 19861 the City Council passed Ordinance 86-164 which approved a revised concept plan for PD-19. The FD reflects a mixed use development. The triangularly shaped tract is shown as part of the right-of-way at tha intersection of Teasley and Lillian Miller Parkway arui contains approximately two acres of land. Recently, the City has been working with NCNB Texas National Bank to exchange the triangularly shaped tract of right-of-way, 3-1 M, r p 14 PSZ Minutes I~ January 9, 1991 , Page 2 the State, for a tract located which has been abandoned by ose of establishing on the western side of PD a fire station as well as - a 16 pufor the blic library. The property is of this site located in a low intensity oragenerala retail type uses$ has already been nn ty calculations for this tract have therefore, the intensity already been established for commercial/retail usage. Ms. Feshari showed the Commission slides of the site. She said that the GTE telephone lines will be relocated unokenround with by GTE sometime in the fall withldefiniti ns of the type of the developer and come up up land uses that would be permitted to develop and a listing of some of the permitted uses. Also, the developer would like the development schedule to reflect that construction completed by would 2013t begin until the year the general be retail 2003 ' Ms. Brock asked why the list of uses is necessary. Ms, Feshari said that they were trying to think of the ' future. They cannot foresee every type of possible use. of is better to come up with general definitions of types uses that would be permitted. The applicant has also decide that thioff-premise s development1e of alcohol should be f prohibited in Petitioner: Robert Reeves stated that he is a consultant zoning reqaBest NB Hand has been working e introduced Howard i Compton, i the vice- zoning rag an oppoortunityCfor aHwinawintsituation. Anshoppingrcenter an opp will be developed on 9.2 acres and a library and iTimre station on the remainder of this 11.2 acre tract# development originally had frontage on theo netof Teasley in 1973 and was approved for 86,200 square of retail uses. The shopping center was part of 71 acres of mixed uses that included residential uses. NCNB is not askingjfor any more square footage for the shopping center. They ust shopping want to retain the 86,200 feet for a one-story center. Several months ago they begat, looking at doing a een land swap with nthe Cit. The Teasle o longer had fr ntage on the tcornerion bThe I moved and they Norm swap will provide them with lothat cation cfor.a fires station intersection is not a g because of traffic back-up. The city also wanted to put a library in this area. The small tract at the intersection too. A was not largo enough for the shoppingre ent r back noon tithe achieved that will p footage intersection. They have not increased any square 3-2 1 1 1 r i f P&Z minutes January 9, 1991 Page 3 but the city will have be able to require landscaping and other new requirements. The 1973 ordinance showed residences abutting the shopping center. Now there is a school on one side and the library and fire station will be j on the other as buffers to the single-family uses. Ms. Brock asked if they had a specific use for the pad in the triangular area in mind. Mr. Reeves said no and they would like flexibility in the time schedule of development. Mr. Engelbrecht asked why the pad was placed on the outside corner of the triangle as opposed to the inside. Mr. Reeves said that they originally submitted the plan with the building on the opposite corner, but the public works E department did not approve of the curb cuts so close to the n intersection. So they reversed the design. Co-Applicant: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that the City has indeed been working on this development and 1 land trade for two years. The Engineering and Fire y Departments see it as a benefit for the City. To develop f the city's property as it is presently situated would not be i ideal. The site plan requires that they use the old right- of-way as acceas. Curb c,ita would be too close to the intersection. The fire trucks would have to make wide turns { on Teasley or take up a large portion of the site so there are lots of access problems with the present confiquration. The proposed new site plan provides much more space and maneuverability. Because the fire station would be further from the intersection, the opticon system could be used. The system would allow the trucks going north on Teasley to turn signal lights green so response to an emergency would be easier. This could not be done if the station were in a corner. The existing site plan would allow development of only a fire station. The new proposal gives such more space. The City Council has suggested a library in the southern part of the City. The proposal provides for that and will mitigate the development cost if each project were built separately. Ms. Brock asked why the fire station will be at the back of j the lot going around the library. p 3-3 ...I t I P&Z Minutes January 9, 1991 Page 4 Mr. Svehla replied that there will be a signal at the egress. It will only be used when emergency vehicles are departing. The library staff wanted the new library to have visibility. The distance from the station to the street is about 100 feet and should not effect response time. t Ms. Brock stated that she is concerned about the safety of j children coming from the school to the library and about them getting in the way of emergency vehicles. i Mr. Svehla said that there will be a sidewalk adjacent to the fire station which the children will use to approach the library. They will have to cross the drive which will be used by emergency vehicles only to enter the station but they will not have to cross the drive by which vehicles leave the station. There is a sidewalk running the full length of the parking lot on the site. He pointed the route out on the site plan. Ms. Brock asked about the shopping center sharing parking with the library. Mr. Svehla said that there will be adequate parking on the city's property for phase I of the library. Ms. Brock asked the size of Emily Fowler Library. Mr. Svehla replied that it is probably 20,000-250000 feet. The proposed library would have more parking than Emily Fowler. Mr. Engelbrecht asked the size of North Lakes Recreation Center. Mr. Svehla was unsure. Mr. Appleton asked if the plan could be amended to reflect 1 a different city use or options. Mr. Svehla said that an amendment would have to be brought back through the City process. He is not sure there would be enough acreage at the site for a recreation center. Mr. Engelbrecht noted that the fire station is further along in planning than the library. The other building could be listed as an option for a library or community center. That would give the City flexibility. 3-4 1 I n ` d f~ p&Z Minutes January 9, 1991 page 5 Mr. Svehla said that as soon as this site plan is approved, construction of the fire station will be moved up. Mr. Engelbrecht asked about the angle of the off-set curb at the station egress. k said that is ned to prevent ft in to t eipath ofsexiting vehicles. cars from turning r. svehle M Ms. Morgan asked if sirens are turned on immediately when vehicles leave. r Mr. Svehla said that they do but at this station the i procedure will be changad. They will run the lights but not scAll hool sirens s point the siren until the truck hits Teasley. When the from the forward and would be moving away there will be a building slopping center is developed, between Teasley and the school to help buffer the sound. In favors no one was present. opposed: Jerry Cott stated that Sundown Ranch is located right across the street from According to City Councilpminutes petition is incomplete. n 80 stone wall across of March 10, 1987, he isentitled h isaapproximately one mile the frontage of his property the long. Any part of this development should trigger building of his wall. He requested that the Council minutes be read. Mr. Robbins said that he has not red thieminlutes but ated to dohs not believe that the current request reason for construction a wall. The wall was not current part of Hr. does not Morris stated address he the wall satisfied an ordinance. Minutes are not legally binding. The wall was not meant to screen the property involved in this case. Jesse Coffey, 3513 Grenada Trail asked who owns the property. it is owned in fee by NCNB as trustee . Compton for the Alexander family. Mr. Coffey asked when the land swap will occur. 3-5 R. 3 i p&Z Minutes January 9, 1991 Page 6 and Mr. svehla said that the Council He wouldelikeitocmove as will land swap atwing meeting. quickly as possible. Mr. Coffey asked if off-promise beer sales would be permitted. Ms. Brock said no. Recommendation: Ms. Feshari said that staff recommends approval with the the ,ottedofhaanngeeiindhushgvelopment schedule and attaching support the staff C Rebuttal: Mr. Reeves said that they recommendation. This issue is a is news win-win to him situation and he urges ll approval. The Chair closed the public hearing. this Mr. Appleton asked if there will be housing abutting proposal on the south side if Bent Oaks develops. He is concerned about noise. Ms. reshari said that the original site plan had houses abutting the site. Mr. svehla said that there has been an amendment which the south have offices and duplexes immediately abutting ha six foot fence between the sites. the bumpers which are about 2 and one-half feet off the ground. This helps to prevent hearing loss by fire unt l vehicles the turned fighters. The sirens will is built asioriginally are out in the road. duplexes proposed, there would going tobbe in sfront ofethearea, office buildings are g g and may help buffer them. Ms. Brock said that she would like to propose an amendment to a community facility. to change the library Mr. Morris said that definition of community facility might be in order. He has some question about the Commission ' changing the actual petition. Mr. Engelbrecht suggested a community facility incluading but not limited to library, recreation center, etc* would allow flexibility. 3-6 J~ 1 1 ~a s e 4 ti t - 1 PSZ Minutes January 9, 1991 Page 7 Ms. Brock moved to label the building a publicly owned community facility with perhaps some definitions added. Ur. Robbins said that other uses were not advertised. -Mr. Morris said that the important question is whether people had opportunity to know whether the building might be a recreation center or other use besides a library. Mr. Engelbrecht asked if a recreation center could be defined as a personal service as listed in the permitted uses for the zoning. Mr. Morris replied that the definitions are to define uses and not expand them. Adding uses is questionable if they were not included in the public notice. It does not appear that a recreation center was advertised. ff Mr. Robbins said that from reading the notice, he does not believe that people would have known other than a library was proposed. There is the same problem if the building is labeled "X". The issue is not the owner. He suggested approving the site plan with the library and then amending at a later date. Ms. Brock withdrew her motion. Mr. Appleton asked who interprets the definitions of permitted uses. Me. reshari said that City staff normally does so. If there are questions, the matter would be brought to the Commission for classification of the use. Mr. Appleton moved to recommend approval of Z-90-016 as recommended by staff. Seconded by Mr. Glasscock and unanimously carried (6-0). Staff report for plat of sites Mr. Yost stated that the ) plat is for the same piece of land as the zoning case. The Development Review Committee recommends approval. It was moved by Ms. Morgan, seconded by Mr. Appleton, and unanimously carried (6-0) to recommend approval of the preliminary plat of the R.N.W. Addition, Block 1, Lots A, B, and C. 3-7 1 14 - --~-g;--...-.~ --fir s-- ~ - r, g f R ATTACHMENT 4 O " City of Denton City Council Minutes q March 101 1987 Page 8 Council concurrence was that Mr. Berry would file a claim with the Attorney's Office. 4. The Council received and considered a request from Mr. i Jerry Cott to amend the approved City Council minutes of August, 19, 1986. ' NOTE: THE PORTION OF THESE MINUTES DEALING WITH THIS REQUEST ARE VERBATIM. Jerry Cott: Mr. Mayon Thank you. Council. Sundown Ranch on Teasley Lane, Dimension Development is on the north part of my property. Their zoning case was z-1818 and one of the issues of that zoning case was a wall that was to be built between their property and mine. In reading the original minutes that you ap- proved and there was not time with the prior City Secretary to get those minutes changed. They did not specifically state that the wall was to be built as you folks had agreed to, so I asked Mrs, Walters if 'she would literally translate, whatever she did, and she did that and submitted it to me and to you. There is a significant difference in her February 17, 1987 literal translation. I would like 2-1818 February 17 literal translation, transmission included 3 in the minutes versus the original ones because in this one, there r is no doubt that the wall has to be built as it was so stated. In ; the original ones that you approved, there is some doubt because the minutes were paraphrased, not literally translated. Thank you. Mayor Stephens: Okay, thank you, Sir. This of course you have in your packet, the taped account from the City Secretary's office. Mr. City Manager, what sort of, if this is a one time case, there is r no problem. But if thiq is a recurring thing, what sort of time constraints are we going to be looking at on the City Secretary's office? Lloyd Harrell, City Manager: Mr. Mayor, I guess that would be the administration's concern about this particular request. When Mr. Cott asked that a transcription be done, we did comply and try to provide that for him as kind of, I guess, backup to support the minutes that were done in summary form, I think that administra- tion's concern would be the same as the one you voiced. That in this specific case, certainly the work has been done and we tried to comply and make the transcript from Mrs. Walters to give that to Mr. Cott, I think we have some concern if, as a regular practice, we would find ourselves asking for requests that transcriptions be made of Council proceedings and having to transcribe those and attach those to the minutes. I think as Mrs, Drayovitch points out in the backup, the minutes that we now do are far more extensive than what law requires as far as the summary minutes of action taken by the Council. So, we we ld just make that comment, Mr, Mayor, that I think the Council, as they consider this specific request, I guess J City of Denton city council Min March 10, 1981 O C Page 9 from the staff's standpoint, if we had some assurance that it would be a very isolated case and would not reoccur, it probably does not do any harm. But we would be very concerned and probably raise that red flag to the Council, if we set a precedent and this starts reoccurring and it does take a lot of staff time. So we would comment and I think also point out as Mrs. Drayovitch does, a two-thirds vote from the Council if you want to add the transcrip- tion as part of the official minutes. Mayor Stephens: Okay, is there a response from members of the Council? Are you ready to take action? simplylado to thelminutes# by attaching the verbatim transcriptis to G: Mayor Stephens: Yes, the type written transcription of the tape. Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney: Technically, legally, that portion would be erased from the existing approved minutes and -the portion, the exact wording, be typed in over it. Mayor Stephens: I thought it was just appended to the minutes. The minutes would remain as is and this would be appended to the minutes. I thought that was what we were asking for. Jerry Cott: Either is acceptable as long as these literal translations get into your minutes. Mayor Stephens: I don't think I would be in favor of expunging the previously approved minutes. Council Member Hopkins: Can we not just insert this after this paragraph and show that this is the literal transaction of this. Because I can understand Mr. Cott's position, in that night, we made a great point to go to extreme circumstances to be sure that that was included and could in no way be overlooked and when we finally had it all worked out, we had very specifically were trying to do this very thing, and I can understand that he would like it to be a part of this record. Debra Drayovitch: Well, I am not sure from, I see these brackets in the existing minutes on Page 247, is I assume what he wants cor- rected and if that is going to be substituted by the exact language, then this language that is in there now needs to be taken out and the exact language put in because you are changing what you have approved. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager: I think, Mrs. Halters, that the brackets were not provided by Mr. Cott, If I understand. The brackets were provided by you to indicate to the Council where his request that he is making, was done in the official minutes, So, that did not come Mr. Cott. /-2 t WIPM r i r 1 0 City of Denton city council minutes March 10, 1987 Page 10 Council Member McAdams: Then the question for me then, is exactly what part of this transcript would we be putting in to subsGitut.e. 1 don't mind appending the whole thing, but it looks to me like if j we're going the change something, perhaps the bracketed portion is what we need to put in. Mayor Stephens: Well, if I might respond to that. As I understand it, now Mr. Cott, you correct me if I am in error here. It is m~r understanding that all this is completely unnecessary. That that 8 fence, if that's sort of thing you are considering, that is to be addressed, when the staff says it will be addressedr at a more appropriate time. G; Mr. Cott: No sir, that was not the issue. Mayor Stephens: I know that you want to try and nail that down, as I understand it now. Jerry Cott: Page 6, "Council Member Alford: but how do we assure that it is there then" and that's what I really am concerned about" from there on. And what I am saying is that is not to be an issue. That was agreed by you, not to be an issue on a goin forward That's automatic, that fence is to be there. This literal f translation states that. This transliteration does not state that. 1 Council Member McAdams: Mr. Cottr,tben the motion in the literal translation which doesn't start until the bottom of page 7 and 8 is where the literal part of that is, are you saying that's not suf- ficient that have substituted. I think part of our question is just how mugh substituting do we need. Mr. Cott: Well, I wasn't prepared to go through this paragraph by paragraph because the literal translation of these minutes is very clear that that fence is to be built. It is not to be addressed in any 1aGer sessions of anything. It is to be built. And that's what you agreea with. Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney: I was just going to try and further explain my reasoning why an addendum would not be appropriate, is just as Mr. Cott explained, if the actual minutes do not reflect what happened, then just merely adding on would not resolve the conflict. The record needs to speak of what truly occurred. Mr. Cott: How would you do that, Ma'am? Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney: Tell us where it is wrong and the Council will consiaer making thac amendment. 4-3 I 1 ~J s 1 7 t City of Denton City Council Minutes March 10, 1987 Page 11 Mr. Cott: I am saying that your entire as approved minutes are wrong, and I Would like this is correct as is. This new, February 17 in it's entirety. Because it was the literal conversation that you had and I tend to be a fairly thorough person and that is some- thing that I would be comfortable with ten years from now when nobody is here and something like that has to be taken care of. Cecile Carson, Urban Planner: Mr. Mayor and Members of the Council: I would assume that the question r?gards the fence condi- tion as being when it would be imposed. During the discussions and if you noticed in the minutes, the conversations between Mr. Morris and the legal staff and our department during the processing of u Z-1818, was that the fence could not be added as a condition to Z-1818 because it was only a portion of the planned development and the entire southern boundary was not being affected. Our conversa- tions with Mr. Cott was that if he was concerned about the fence, that he might want to go on record as stating that the fence would be considered during a zoning action when it could be placed as a condition during the detailed site plan stage. But it could not be imposed as a condition to Z-1818 because it was, in our opinion, not a valid condition for the amendment and should be considered at the time that the detailed plan for the entire development was done. So it was a reference that you were telling him that you would make to the minutes and it is in the Planning and Zoning Commission minutes as well, that at the same time that the detailed plan was considered, we would look at the fence issue to determine where it would be located and at that point, if it was necessary, if the need was still there for the fence and his concerns were still, that the fence should be located on that boundary line. Mayor Stephens: Okay, any questions that you might have of Ms. Carson? Council Member Hopkins: No, but I think we were all clear on what Ms. Carson had stated that night and I didn't feel like that was what Mr. Cott, that's still not the issue. Because we can see in here what we actually approved. j Mr. Cott; That is correct, Mrs. Hopkins. She is correct in what we said and that did not satisfy me that evening. This whole discus- sion is why I want this pinned down. And that is, thatLthiw.was.a proposal"thab..therw is no question that the-wall is to be built. Not when and wh'6FV $hJ"hdw, bugq t it wa111 a? to nbokitti bel4re they start a ° development i:t btmanai¢n „6~'vaToA to hat was what you agreed to unanimously. Council Member Alexanderr Could I ask a question to the City Attorney that might help resolve this matter? Could some action be taken tonight to reaffirm what the Council did back on thAt earlier date and make that a part of our minutes tonight and would that be satisfactory to Mr. Cott? would that possibly resolve it? 4-4 r 1 2 City of Denton City Council Minutes } March 10, 1987 Page 12 Mr. Cott: Yes Sir, DA ra Drayovitch: That is possible but if the Council intends y tonight to agree that no matter how that final site plan comes back, 1 there will be a fence a part of that, I do not think legally the Council can agree that no matter what the conditions are of the future proposal, there will be a fence included. Mr. Cott: That's what was agreed to, Mrs. Drayovitch. Right there, what you said, was agreed to. Council Member Chew: I think that's where our problem is coming - Gd miscommunication. Because the agreement was made that night that we would require that fence to be built. Mr, Cott: And that's why I am here tonight because it is not clear in your minutes. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager: I think as was point out, I don't anybody had any difficulty either Mr. Cott, if I recall, that a fence would be there. The people that were proposing the develop- ment :zad agreed, you had agreed and that was reflected in the discussion. There really was no disagreement. It was simply when was the appropriate time to show that -particular improvement. And....... Mr. Cott: No,.,Sir, what happened is that. yyo,,t4Mi,peior~ =plannrd°deve9opa~bdiI'waa aonsE'ructeA,`` puiltJ' that E2~x j~¢ ,t*4?k4 That's what you agreed to, And that's what I want td`the minutes. As you can see, the the City Planning Office and the City Attorney, themselves, don't understand what was done at the last meeting, Council Member Riddlesperger: Mr. Mayor. Mayor Stephens: Yea, Mr. Riddlesperger. Council Member Riddlesperger: If I move that this transcript be inco,:porated in the minutes of this evening as evidence of the meanit,g of the minutes of such and such, as a satisfaction to Mr. Cott and everyone else, could I get a second? Council Member Chew: Yes. Mayor Stephens: We have a motion and a second to incorporate the taped transcription from the August 190 1986 Council meeting onto the minutes of tonight's meeting. It is the tape dated 8-19.86. Mr. Cott: And transcribed by Jennifer Walters on. 9-5 1 Y r• i j City of Denton City March 10, 1987 Council Minutes I Page 13 1 Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney: I'm trying i t the record but ranscrib ed verbatimw d91dwe11e to include thatotoclarify ' misunderstandings for Mr. Cott+s So that there won't a minutes re protection as well as ours.~Y Future Mayor Stephens. All right, does everyone understand. further discussion? Yes, Madame city Secretary, Okayr any Jennifer Walters, Acting City Secretary: I would clarification on the verbatim transcription, Portion of the minutes or the whole thing? of this like a particular I Council Member McAdams: This portion, I would think, Mayor Stephens: Just this portion, please. Any further Okay, those in favor, say "aye", those opposed, say 'no'. carries unanimously, question. Motion NOTE: THE NEXT PORTION OF MINUTES Is A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES TAPS OF 8-19-86, TRANSCRIBED 2-17-87. PRblf, TAP TAPr.O Mayor Stephens: The next item is 38. Z-1818-petition of Dimension Development amendment to a planned development PO-19 and pp-pant requesting an concept plan for the single family (SF-10)0 singled famil cluster housing and approval of a Parkwa park areas located east y 114'ej 161.7 acres wastzoned intersection of Teasley Lane, FME 2181Lillian . T Mille: the development Panned development famil The permits Y Ordinance 84104 and permits Of clusterp multi- Y 10,000 famil square feet, single famtl Y, genorai retail, single park and a community facilit y 7,000 square feet areas as mentioned in the backup material. amThe would oZoning site. The ni and Commission recommends approval. Is there anyoie inthenaodiencewho would like to speak in favor of 2-1818. Ploase come forward and like the others state your name and your anchor and proceed, Rick Neff : Mr. Mayor and members of the ou : Neff, I'm with Dimension Development Com any. m You this evening asking a P ~ Fe bringnthisibefoout roperty. The propertwasp zjlned PD in 1984. We are coming before You to change some of the uses. We are also asking a concept plan which was not required in 1984 which gives better idea of what exactl approval of h to answer any questic•,s, y it is we plan to do, 2 Wouldobeahappy 4-6 I I r r V 1 V J I 1 4 City of Denton city council minutes y March 10, 1987 page 14 i Mayor Stephens; Okay, what did you say your name was please sir? Rick Neff: ,Ky name is Rick Neff, N-E-F-F. i Mayor Stephens: AS in Pat, Governor Pat Neff? Rick Neff: Yes sic. % Mayor Stephens: Okay. You related? Rick Neff: Yes sic. k Mayor Stephens: Are YOU? All right, that was a long time ago, that won't help you or hurt you. Rick Neff: I'm glad to hear that. Mayor Stephens: Okay. Anyone else like to ask Mr. Rick Neff any 1 questions) Council Member Riddlesperger: I noticed that it's on Lillian Miller. Rick Neff: Yes sir. Council Member Riddlesperger: Are you going to pave the other two lanes of that street? i didn't see this in your material, I just wondered? Rick Neff: There must have been a reason for that sir. No sir, we don't have that in our plans at this moment. Council Member Riddlesperger: it seems to me that there is a part, a part of the problem your going to have there and in terms of access and I just wondered why that wasn't in that plan? Rick Neff: That's a good question sic. I'm not sure I have a real good answer for that, except that's not in our plans at this point. Council Member. McAdams: Ire there going to be rig'.t-of-way for that left. Rick Neff, We've dedicated the right-of-way already. 1 Council Member McAdams: Okay. Mayor Stephens: Okay, other questions Mr. Neff? Thank you air, Rick Neff: Thank you, Mayor Stephens: Is there anyone else in the audience who would like to speak in favor of this petition? 4-7 *I I d t sr . ,.v . t . r •y', r +t P } r a w '1r '.~.'g ~ ¢""r~. a~.i! ~p.'.~"r ~ r..* ~ s. ~ x,M°, vi a~qJ •i a'.. bnq rif~~Yi:M'~S.iS~~d'a41[~i~s~hk'6~5.'i rni3Sti'~idtiidr.C~L~i'_tr Ii :i•~~41H1`~°~kl~~~~"~"'RSlG1~fiY~~4~r r ,~~Pl+''~Li.~wYl. 'J;~ ISO p RNI ~V 5 1` pl, - - _ ~i_ t ~ M, "A 04 MENUBQARD SIGN. h3 Goa rr r' 1 r 1 ~ ' PA K(NG LO.T , ~20 051 r ` 41 I ~J~ MA4 FivT' vN r 4"1 .rY. _ ap o 1 44 pit L C ,R ,c IU' t i } AA, Poo ' i Tr.i i ~ g AIL ....~..f T M~ YpICA41 ~ . ; , . , ~ Fyn, c 4 ,4 4I Vpy.~ IV4 , 03 DRIVE-THIS! SIGN i Y' \ 1 ,N 1 t Aks y i' W A:$ l 1 IW _ ~ 4" GA$ it w a ` M • ; v  i so's ' 7 j ~ . ,'nJ } Sys 1 . F ~{r 4 r r s 24 1tia 7 4 (~ji ~r p U ~ ~v i. t f Prix ~ ~ i4 A~ ` ~ ~`'~~fix,, ~ II ~ ~ ~ 104 CH tCOP . , Lam' S 40 d: ' lpe TRUE ^ ~NbtlB: iN°,yo,o,o $qm LON OZ LOGO SIGN "NORTH ~'M ~~YY r ir+baYiYrBY irYl~riri~r.r+.uNprra~Y~i.+~/YI~r~ YY+ ~ .h°k ka rstt"~ ^~4 'r t~ yy~~rt~v rt+ry ;x'1.F'F4 by a'V+~F'r''""nkli".`,i1-01 r. ?1. nt, A'.'1 .~nr rtir„ r. r n ..r ra , ' ! r, v: J ~ i. Y." ~1, r. .Y~r•4~tJ~r r Wr' + +~k44&~Y47A9Si K+r,ly WIMdaS?..,w•~lw.d_iFa:ld:Rvl `i".~~,c'.{oY.~.':U, fil4'v~Jtl,t avtna!.`v.dY.~9,aeCa(~:3~I~u.t 'd9 .;{R.'rf. ~'iTl,1 r1.pA a1 r.'..: .~1 1}'!,'Yr. ,J !r r .y...ir.l) r ,F.1 j r r Ely ;S F 4: j•...i S .R'pr 'z'irp:~yltgJa~l `fY i vi ;ryl ~1~A r'ld,f , yr! ; r-. ~t ! a ,~3 i i J i r r y i . h tk ( P ~.i( h° 6 r Y l l r~ a Ir Ir r, r`r~'ryrw 7., JpA, ^ ~ U N.T .1 ` NOTE, 'I two'" IP I '1~~'. ' i lei t I to ~t t~1M'FU~°,fNI~~UL I : J :~;-t ~r 46 r 90 f►x IXi1Sx )4F,'III~''1A4 1'IIIIN IT00k M~ItMUDA I , r ; h ,►;S'i1lRI vw'' A$~ JOk~A) Um h6S SJ , i~q WITH W000 r AIM 99025 S,!'. FmMr YARD 140 31WOOD S,l'1 1A~ fROwR~pSD 3,569,00 846 i TREES# w ! i' . 1~pQUIRS FM ft'ItSE►'YAM OOIRAIN'~lRS Ot A YAP.. OF EAgI ft" Tw Man (S IN pzIWEw MkASIIRP AT g10UND I a 4 0 (AS M AR aY, 2.A . G ' ` I~lf01t ~'I YAp1b ~'Ifl~l1 II0 000 ShF,, ONE 7Rl~ ~ a~ M Z I00''SeFs OR ON JtHOSWO OF MEXT YARIl,. (AS AMUI 30~A,~ ~ srR~t'YARo ~9,9w,tssrr, rAm I TRW2,500 st"i i 7494 MICA plain AS M =c'1) it~D C' (y)~ 0DAR OL M1) ' KA' to, L t0to15mi~ ~rr 1 r P1NK0 iAVE WNITELu 'rt Mrcttrr) vm O04Q I •RSD AND YEI N w J '4 r~.~ s L~"~ r C- {trF xrr r - RzUU t VAX r ~ t ~A '.-Iwmlm,A lY I rpm r~ ~ ,~Sl1,NOS,,•~INS~W~ (1Cf~lf1N'>I~ . ~ ~Q AREAS 1 i Ift1 1l ~1pI' .u~RF/l, #004'r R t . rl '1 (Sx) Ol! '~GIAtr PAPA ~4/II Of IM w r; ` 1 ~M1♦ V11 ON iflGliAl~ I/"1711f~~ If1{0`P 1{1 17{~fiii - 4. J F ' c .r •1AMSM AItG~~10IRM) ■ 100 S,FO MID YAW IV$ am" IV 10 "F'• Ig 11 Y p° l~ii is S1F ! s ~2 17r as FOR A rD'IA>r OF 1 190 SOFSI, fit ! 01 ~ rla 4 SCREENING, &MMINO OF 1P "IK IAr,S(; AM ~)b A IN= tR r ZIIE mi PdAKI IDt03I10IN0 DN YS VAII Ys ADJ~ C ~ 'DI" A''.NIN . N~tIdIC' d!` • ~ , 9 MI~1~OIt~ED' 'C411E ~ ~ :r'~ FACL~ OF" w PARKING lAT PAR S S SHnUSSN" AX 3Qi~S~3'MINO MAI~1! w. } i `WHICH umb IE. b PPMDE A SCAM OF ' i 'lll kl UZRED L YCIfI 1iIMIN' Yt~11IS,QF,I'~A!almost TV9 XAt, BE',UOCA A FNO' {IIIW IN . ~Vq! Y~l #YSO);t, PtI'0!" Ih10M1AC ttillft (4) Iw ed!l~pi Mo" lL~I!'IR~ , AND'I1AIF CASES We ~~DM$'tUlllll tW1A'O+D~N DiNJtF YAUPOH ~I'd~,IJYG ' SIM, MR $M tGDxNq'1'1P~,44 `I+0 I ~r i 0IGkC`i' 141Hoots PAOVIDr~ OMI: tYEMY 30 INC 0 Qu x60 i  f ~ qIT Il ftv4f SrI11Wr YARD IAE"CAM,001T ♦1 y .Et00't QF PI MItNt'LYIMA HfA1NPaj PEl`WLE ~AllM ~Z1'~N'Ij~I,l D~I/Il?' LIN lMt*~'-i a, L, O(nM, M 1, S ' ~ 1 k !fix 6"J1'I'R~C ~1Si D~ ,Mtf'at) ~AM (r"k 3Q)ARE) SIP4 PER MR y t 1, 1 1 1 ' ~ A R~ IR I ! AL ;Psw st ~1 ~~I+ 1 rl ' %YNOT9 p hi TABUL YIaNSM i r . s' YOZ 7AMAV0t1St 0' 1,04. AREA TAM AM 1 I I I 1 s,r 3 3 AA S6F4 v s, sort I{+ ~ I i~ I x ~.Itr , ' S 127 Si!$ 6 16 Sort ~I 7 16 Sara ICIt 0OdM~y~`~illt'T'Yti~ i• , . It %fop..r~:..~..l . 'sewYANOlWA' 4' I (LAw-js hfplNa) r' y , F LFsri NORTH V r I in " MAL Soya MCVftol ~I a' (}01 sort J •1 I f'r ''r{ 1 i'yM'r'J~~~~~ m' Lf 01' 4ANDSCAr)g, PL r y 1r } irl ~i~67 S() its ! li 11 I 1 , \ E 1 ONA HI SdAL1 t r~ f FL ~ I Ix rr . Ir r~ ~ ~ a +C^!, i I/ o r 1 I P ~ 4 I f I i- '7. I 1. li} < P7.~ 1 '1 ,F/' , ~ r k. r ~ • 1 - 1 • s I .r. ~ _ _d r r. k r '.~.I 1 i,, I k r 14 .1 J • t+'ci," t l fl dt~~r r a, .i,'" •I`+li+y < p•+' rv J { t I' 'l+' a. t .l.. gf. ~i~. r .,r .V r IY! yfk rrl lrf-.'11 ,k r 15 k' a+1..! t., f'•, v' 1~, ' e f; 5 rA! tl ,1 k 1 +."t" e. £ Ii.! + e Iv•4 1 1. f' v. 1JJ'.1'Ali 1 re.t, v 1 Ir r. i', +,f: p I' rl'!• t i,j ~t r. .1,: s :0 k y(f l 'r,.'a s 'r,kl fi rY t 1 M r a Y 1 ,1 x 4+~ }.1dp r j.~r r " r1 c•11 r I c. M + r'.~1 y}. (y~~}~ 17 r~t r y^yyL 7ryY~ 6p ~Lr? ~p t +1, ~ t 1.'V': '~(J r 1 f+ +t 't 1 1.+;•', F'.fl ~,~'i ~''L{~ t y il9'' ~"5 ~ ~1~ , r f ! i ^ •3 '•4, .riY n, ~~y P.•.~ M'r{" S A!!, a f, .Y 1' dp,. .`R"1 r." i .1 ~ Y) r '~#~f ~ ,H r.''; I r' '•3 ,1 pP.,s la ~ .r`;. lj I , ry F'"~!', (r 1~i li ✓,a J ti\ (+l II I.." 1• .x .J;. , "I 'A }T I } ,i } ' d . cifRJI-~r r ±,^t,, i r{ ...if. i, q,,;! t r~J ,.t'^',r,. I .r, fJ ,i'f, .~A rJ..:i.. r ~2 e tea Yg, "971'M1,h"'~Z"wM f,A ~]p o§x"~ "•'1'~`''Y =I 4 C. L• kp '1 i',.1 u,( h. '4 i9"' S " .ray I;, Il., 1.~ ~1 v I ! !FI' 1 ;r v' r. ~:4 $:if'~i'{~,' " t r,,i tir~r:+l ~y'r'# 17 ileitr ~ '4~':#[e -:•k~ l ' 17:}:Rr.~;.{~k„"~1 K1.1 I ;'k 4 rE :7~ i oa aJd 11l~~tl 9 { 7 M' 11 • 1 e L4~•^ R, ,.,.v^:v r. ,u., k, .sti%.. Y s+-,e W fl.q; 't. ~::Y'k 1 . 1... - 9 14 k t.. a. , . r a,. . ,r.I ,#yi .R,Pw llus r 1 v.i ,r„ 11l. n. 4k5 1 ...y 4? .d. }..M 4 k .r: ir.. 16 Y.. y... v 5 r+"'' ~ k',T 1 1,01 l .+"I i.. 1~ ~:r! U>,^ do }d ::M ,'r r~, • 'IC . " Pv a a . r ..I .J. >,x J k "5!" R ~r~~~p +~,~.lar xi J.g a~~y ~ R1`t~~r"~9 k,<~ t"7 .~i 9'' t y J, %y . = 4 I r~ + a i Page of Denton City Council Minutes t March lo, 1997 k 15 Jerry Cott: Mayor Stephens and Coimt Cott, undow in e S oft: .Rancho just to the stthyof this. Basicall ?W 'm Jerry favor of this with two comments. ment number one is th are'in original agreement where that e Dimension Development's Prooertysee a black line on thesouth tof he started and many times sincehasr' Wachter, many years or stone eight-foot wall between that greed to ago when put a permanent brick Just wanted to make sure that that wasp in ythe a property and i two. Please don't accept this as a lecture Peil Number properties are now zoned on a first-come, first-served basis and r know that this City Council and the zoning ~J community are wrestling with that and the zoned agricultural that people of this f issue. There is no people ► which would not I could have at this point in time except Planning Guide, and I go over the city Guide according to the first-served first-and strongly urge that you take the issue of this community's operating p and seriously eliminate that as 9 procedure. Thank you, part of Mayor Stephens] Okay, an Is there anyone else who likeetoispeakoinrfavor of 2- else who would like to speak in favor of this Cott? Thank you air. ~ in favor? Hearin petition?18Anyonenehe audience who like to speak in opposition to 2-1818?is anyone in the Claudia Brown; My name is Ridgecrest in Southridg a and Ilaudia Brown and I live at 315 approved, i+hat is he going to do jdst want to know it this is that these people can ' or what a the City going to do au out, and that's my onl got in and out, because we can't Y pposition to it, get in and Council' Member Riddlespergeri you're asking, the same asked, Who's going to pave the other two lanes of Ridgeway?ueation I Claudia grown: Well, I've only there tour knowledge, I can either get out b years and to my Lillian Miller, which is you know fairly neW a or I can the access road, Well you caneleave by the traffic backs u you cant leave by the access road because you can't get b p off the interstate and so 't got Y to go back to town which is where I awork, And cif you go out Lillian Miller, gthhe i n tree morning I have to wait three or four traffic lights to anymore on Teasley, so F just, how am y going dto get to work? got out Mayor Stephens: Okay, I see what you mean Me. Brown, An of Ma Brown? Okay, thank y questions time comes, the traffic Y aituation, will address, I who would like to speak in Y+ is there pes the anyone when opposition? Anyone in to 2-18187 Anyone in minute we have a Let me declare this, well wait a particular rebuttal. Would the petitioner like to address the question raised and limit yourself only to the raised? Okay, thank you, We declare the public hearin closed and question Presentation,cail upon the City Manager to direct g to be his staff 4-8 ' 1 6 City of Denton City Council Minutes March 10, 1987 Page 16 City Manager Harrell: Yes, let me at least start by asking the Planning Staff to make the primary presentation please. Cecile Carson, Urban Planner: Mr. Mayor and Members of the Council, as already, has been mentioned this is a planned development that is approved and in place under Ordinance 84109. This is an amendment to that proposal and a request for approval of a concept plan on the residential areas. The three areas of concern are basically, F would like to point out to you for clarification is, a change from 15 acres of cluster housing that would have abutted Mr. Cott's acreesingle family area on the inorth famil b undary -line s that twas SF-10 that would be changed to single family on 7,000 square foot lots I area alsol thand at a abuts addition to iuntil in ndustrial he 28.53 acre cluster housing the light the planned boundary line. This roert development on the Parkway and Teasley at the intersectiondoin thetoriginaln planned development when it was approved right-of-way, to answer one of the .questions, was provided by these developers and paving was done of those two lanes. Additional right-of-way has been provided by the developers to construct the additional two lanes for Lillian Miller's expansion and it's my understanding that the money situation for that will be involved through the bonding process or the bond approval to actually do the paving of those additional r lanes on Lillian Miller north of 35, To clarify the issue brought up by Mr. Cott concerning the fence, In the original ordinancelix there was not a condition imposed to build or construct that fence,'J In discussions with the Legal Department, since this is an amendment, it was stated that that item is something that should be addressed technically during the detailed plan stage when these developers would be required to bring back their specific details and screening for the project and it is not an item that should be addressed at this point, However, we did mention to Mr, Cott that it would be for his best benefit to have it on the record of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council that he is still concerned and still interested at that detailed plan stage to have the fence constructed, The overall amendment does not significantly change the intensity or the density in this area. It remains at the consistent amount of approximately six percent over the standard. The proposal does seem to add a number of benefits including diversity in the area and the Planning and Zoning Commission did recommend approval by a vote of 5-1. There were nine reply forms mailed to property owners within 200 feet and one was returned in favor, And if you have any questions I will be pleased to respond, Mayor Stephens: Any questions of the Council to Ms. Carson, Ms. Carson would elaborate just a little bit more. You said that it would not change the density all that much. To change from SP-10 to 5P-7 and to increase the number of cluster housing, whatever cluster housing is, and that comes under different definitions I think, looks like that would increase the density a bit. 4-9 Y T - -w , _ws Yy. A`F:.;aP 1 n 1 City of Denton City Council Minutes March 10, 1987 page 17 A Carson: In certain areas it will change the density as an increase, but by eliminating the cluster housing which had a density of approximately 120 units and reducing it to single family SF-70 which is approximately 4.7 units per acre, you have a significant reduction in that one area. The single family 10 andhatg a family 7 is about a .7 difference between the density t has been proposed by the developers, so there's not a whole unit difference on the percentages and in the cluster area, they are increasing it by approximately 25 units. But there's still an overall decrease in their total units for the project and that really has a great deal to do with the fact that their figures or their density figures for the SF-7 is slightly lower than what we use as a standard in most straight zoning requests for single family with 7,000 foot lots. this property south G: Maor Stehens: How will then, in the transition from tagricultural to the . 1 Carson: What has been recommended in the Development Guide basically is when one of these intensity areas is over the standard that we look at it from an entire planning area and what the surrounding land uses are. This will provide some additional flexibility for Mr. Cott or whoever may at some point zone the property to the south. That we would look at what the surrounding zoning is in order to consider a proposal for his property though it than van intensitydissue at thatdpointmo ince the intensityihasibeen used. 't Mayor Stephens: Then on the other side, has the transition to the north side been changed. The Village$ or what ever that was. Carson: The property to the north that abuts the single family, or that abuts this family is single family with 100000 square foot lots, Mayor Stephensi On that the Village? The wall on it? Carson: That property abuts Teasley and comes back towards this corners and you might point it out# the property is split on the going eto the boundar d es that significantly altertie~sition, the sevens c Would you address Mayor Stephens: Then one last thing. nob intensBwn's ity$ as inquiry you explai ed concerning traffic, intensity is dnott chat much. Carson: he far as our traffic generation, correct. Mayor Stephene: so that was i believe was the extent of her it any its already been affect d# will then owh t is adversely affect place. moret then which 4-10 / ` 1 ~ 1 t ~ 1 8 City of Denton city council minutes March 10, 1987 Page 18 ' Carson: Right, the zoning that is in place today would be the same traffic generator as the amendment that's being proposed. Mayor Stephens: I see. i Carson., So they will not generate any more traffic ana then the road itself would be as part of that bond proposal to actually do the other lanes for construction which would improve the area but the intensity would not change because of this amendment, Mayor Stephens: Mr. Riddlesperger's question, do you want to address that in a moment? ' I ayor Stephens: well let me see, any more questions for Ms. Carson M though. Carson: Mr. Ellison was just pointing out as something that the citizens of the area might be interested in is that there is a proposed collector that's shown through th;s operty Lillian Miller, At this point it would dead rend i that connects area, The developers in this request have been workin atw1t t the State School and with the adjoining q h the collector street to State Schol Roapwpro hichtwould eultimatelyebe Loop 288, That would add an additional access out of that Southridge, d southeast Denton area to the south and to the east which would provide some additional assistance in traffic, Mayor Stephens: Across state property? Carson: The property that is l own Where the park, Brier Cliff Parkrisepresentlydlo by the. aclease collector streeth al City for at ththis park to be located there, The property and connect into State School pRoad~ would go through that Mayor Stephens: who would pay for the road across state property? Carson: I believe that the developers would pay the majority of it that went through their actual development, Mayor Stephens: Yeah, I know, but, on State School Road, who would ' pay for that? The developer? Carson: I believe that it would be have to be worked out, where the developersw end proba l g that would would have participation of some kind of agreement to build that road, The specifics have not determined that I know of, mayor Stephens: Okay, thank you, Mr. City Manager. 4-11 I i I i ~i lk Y City of Denton City Council Minutes ` March 10, 1967 Page 19 Lloyd Harrell: Yes, Mr. Mayor, I just wanted to elaborate just a bid on Council Riddlesperger's question regarding Lillian Miller and clarify to the Council, that as part of the Capital Improvement ~I Program that has been filed with the Council by the Planning and 'toning Commission. 'It does call for funding to complete that section to a four-lane section on Lillian Miller. And as Council is aware that now will be funnelea back to the Citizen Capital Improvement Committee that the Council has recently proposed and that will be back to you probably within the next couple of months for final decision, and then possibly a bond issue. Council Member Riddlesperger: we can get some votes that way. How far is it from this proposed street over to State School Road? How { far is it across there? Mayor Stephens: How far is it to cross the way? Caraon: About a mile. Mr. Neff: First of all, we also are owners of the adjoining tract. There are two thoroughfares or collectors planned. One would go directly across this, we are showing right now, to 35. the other would wind around the lake and go down to the southeast portion of the adjoining property, across this northern tab of the green here, which is State School property. I have been working with the State Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation now for many months. They are in agreement with us that we need a collector i across there and they agree to give us access# or right-of-way. Mayor Stephens. And you would pay for the whole thing. Mr. Neff: Sir# as Cecile was kind enough to point out, the details on that haven't been worked out. But it is certainly an essential part of oir development in this whole area o! development as far as access to the entire aree. Mayor Stephens: Does any member of the Council have enything further to add? Council Member Alford: I was curious as to perhaps, Mr. Mayor, in regard to the buffer wail that Mr. Cott was referring to. Mayor Stephens: Eight font. Council Member Altordt is this included in it, or did the City Attorney have some comment on that. Did I misunderstand that? Mayor Stephens: I believe the question was, is the Planning Staff have that written into the agreement. 4-12 i 1 1 T 'Y ~ i ~r I r 20 City of Denton city council minutes March 30, 1987 Page 10 ► Council Member MCAdamsi And they said no, that it was not, Mayor Stephens: You know, I did not catch that. Okay. Council Member Alford: Okay, that is what I ►hought I heard. Mayor Stephens; Ms. Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney ' i Debra Drayovitch: From the notes indicated at the Minutes of the Planning Commission and Ms. Carson's communications with Mr. Morris who is our zoning representative, I believe it is indicated that the appropriate time to insert that requirements for the screening wall is at the detailed site plan approval stage. C4 Council Member Alford: But how do we assure that it's there then. Mayor Stephens= By putting it in now, really. Council Member McAdams: But, we've got it, unless we are going to amend our ordinance, see we have got an ordinance, it does not include it, an amendment. Carson: If I might address this more specifically, the main reason for this is because the amendment does not affect the entire southern boundary of that project. It only affects one small property, which, since it is an amendment we would technically only r have control over requesting that that masonry wall be located along, that one section of SF-7. Which could potentially create more of a problem then waiting until the detail plan when it could be placed all the way across the southern boundary, And what has been dbne, is there are letters and statements from Mr. Cott and it is in the Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission and now in the Minutes of the City Council, that this is an item that should be addressed, So that it will be on file and in the planning staff's records so that when the detailed plan is submitted, that item can be inserted as a condition to that detailed plan. Mayor Stephernss Well, why couldn't it be inserted now so you can remove that uncertainty and have it as a matter of record? ' Carsonr It is my understanding that Mr. Morris had a problem with it because it was only an amendment to a portion of the planned development and you could only require the fence along that portion of the planned development that was being amended. So it might actually divide the neighborhood and have part of it with a fence and part of it not depending on how their detail plan was submitted, Lloyd Harrell: Mr. Mayor, if I may, My understanding is that all the parties are in agreement. That fence, if I understand correctly, from the developer, everyone is in agreement that that 4-13 J w r..,. otr r,.x 1 i ~ n City of Denton City Council Minutes 2 March 10, 1987 Page 21 Will be provided during the development process, and what we're talking about is just the technique for insuring that it -is accomplished. And I think that is why the staff suggested that we put that request in the Minutes and what I would suggest is )ust a statement similar to the one that I made. That everyone is in agreement that that fence will be provided at the appropriate time when the final development plan is produced, so that everybody understands that. I think from a legal standpoint it's best to do it later although the intensions should be expressed at this point. Debra Drayovitch; I think if you go ahead and have a portion, I C, mean you could go ahead and include that as a condition of the ordinance before you, and I'm not sure of the affect it would have later on. But I think you still have the opportunity to come back at a later point in time and will have the authority to withhold development approval until that condition is met. Council Member McAdams: Is the motion in order? Mayor Stephens: Yes the motion is in order. Council Member McAdams: Then I want to move the approval of 2-1818, the ordinance, as provided in the agenda packet. And add an a note in the Minutes that Council desires at the time of the review of the detailed site plan, that a fence along that northern, do we consider that.., the southern wall, southern, I mean southern boundary, that the :solid fence along the southern boundary be incorporated in that detailed site plan. Council Member Alford: Second that, r Mayor Stephens: Okay, motion second to approve the ordinance before us with the condition of the eight-foot masonry fence be added at the appropriate time. Any further discussion► Madam Secretary. Un roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander mays," Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye," Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Stephens: All voted Aye. 1517] ' NOTE: THIS COMPLETES THE vEA3ATIM PORTION Of THE MINUTES 5. Public Hearings A. The Council held a public hearing on the request of Teasley Road Associates for annexation of approximately 80.82 acres being part of the James Coltart Survey, Abstract 288, and located northwest of new Loop 288, north of Kings Row, and west of Farris Road, (A-42) 4-14 i t ~ Pd160 ATTACHMENT 5 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING THE DETAILED PLAN FOR 11.20 ACRES OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LILLIAN MILLER PARKWAY AND TEASLEY LANE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, NCNB Texas National Bank and the City of Denton have petitioned for the approval of a new detailed plan for 11.20 acres of a planned development districts and WHEREAS, on January 90 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the new plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS; G SECTION I. That for the property described in Exhibit A, attached to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference, the new detailed plan shown as Exhibit B, also attached to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference, is approved for the district in accordance with article 11 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances. SECTION-.U.L That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding separate provision and distinct h offense~.ance is violated $2#000. Each day shall copstitute a that a shall IiI. That thi' ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of r 1991. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST; j J JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY 1 1 BYs I APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA A. DRCAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNFtiY J l BY 5-1 J 1 Y 1 ' EXHIBIT A FIELD NOTES ALL that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land situated in Denton 1 County, Texas in the C. Poulallier Survey A-1006 and being all of k a tract shown by deed to FIRST NATIONAL BANK, TRUSTEE recorded in i4 Volume 718F Page 57 Deed Records of Denton County Texas and part of a tract deeded to the State of Texas recorded in Volume 400, Page 334 Deed Records and also part of a tract shown by deed to the City of Denton, Texas recorded in Volume 2423, Page 154 Real Property Records and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northwest corner of said Pirst National Bank tract and in the existing southerly right-of-way lii,a of P.M. G•' 2181 and in a curve to the right whose radius is 671.21, and central angle is 40 55' 27*t THENCE easterly along said curve and right-of-way an arc distance of 57.68' to a points THENCE north 700 14' 160 east and crossing the State of Texas tract 62.74' to a points THENCE south 890 43' 041 east a distance of 422,60' to a point for a cornea , THENCE south 10 04' 170 east a distance of 290,74' to a point in the northerly right-of-way line of ,?,M, 21811 THENCE south 10 46' 454 east and crossing F.M, 2181 a distance of 366.43' to a point for a cornett THENCE south 30 101 05* east a distance of 293.21' to the southeast corner of said First National Bank tract! THENCE south 880 49' 530 west with the south line of said first j National Bank tract 493,17' to its southwest cornett THENCE north 10 10' 050 west a distance of 504,7) to a point for a cornett j THENCE north 240 23' 0011 west a distance of 123,63' to a point i for a cornett THENCE north 10 101 0511 west a distance of 33460' to the point of Beginning and containing 11,20 acres of land, 0707E/58 . 1 5-2 4 i r~ I I 3 ~ 1 d EXHIBIT B Detailed Plan Consisting oft 1. Development standards (4 pages) 2. Site Plan (i page) C'' I 3, Permitted Uses (2 pages) I i i j I { 1 5-3 f a . x_ ,+y 'Mew. A 1 h.B:,~(i W I~ DEVELGPMENT STANDARDS ` CONCEPT PLAN DETAILED PLAN i 1. Statement Of Intent of Owners Redesign existing PD 16 which is for retail uar■ to include the aonthwisac rarnar of Lillian Miller Parkway and Teasley Lane and include a tract to be used for a new library and fire station There is no increase in seuare footage for retail uses and the size of the retail tract has decreased by almost an acre, l i 2, Statement Indicating Relation to Denton Development Guide$ Development standards era stated on the site plan and conditions. It not ocher- visa stated, than the apDtouriatlt stand rds in the Denton DlyalaRmw<Ot Gulch praviil, 36 Total Number of Acres in Proposed Districts j 11.2056 acres ~ t 4, Land Uses and Total Number of Acres in Each Parcel of TEaatl Total Proposed Acreage a, single family Detached j b, sinala family Attached Itownhouses, cluster, eta,) a, Attached Patio/Garden/taro Lot Line I d. Duplex t as Multi-family I f, Gftice - g, Neighborhood service h, General retail 8,3792 Commerolal is Light Industrial k, Heavy Industrial 7.ain1 r L Other (specify) Institutional 5-4 ' I j t WWI Davalopmgnt Standards page 2 y, Of(-Site ln(orlnatlon - adjacent or succounding land uses, zoning, $treat$# drainage facilities, and other existing or proposed Improvements. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) *Transportation - indicate existing and proposed streets, parking lots, 61 Traffic and loading areas, access points. IShown on concept or detailed plan-) 11 Projected Traffic Generation- (Based on traffic study, if required.) 6,461 trips Notet The onl increase is t 295 tri s attributed to the in itutio a ' use since LkIW tees ex et n PD b. G•i. 71 Buildingas at )Approximate location- (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) b. Maximum heights one stor s 24 feet co Minimum eetbacksi (Shown on concept or detailed plan.( Per Code d. Maximum gross floor area Jaguars fast) lot nontesidentials ii Libra, - 30 00011 . it ft - 86,200 sq. it. i to Residential Subdivisions a. Number of units par We (danalty)s NIA b. Humor and location of loess (Shown on concept of detailed plan.( j i o, Minimum e12sr width and depth of lour (Shown on concept of detailed plan4) 1# j d, minimum + side and tut yard letbackss (Ahown on concept of detailed plan.( front I 1 5-5 h ~ h rwx2..~ 1 7 Development Standard3 Plge 3 9, Water and Drainage - approximate location of all existing or proposed creeks, ponds, lakes, floodplains, other water retention or major drainage facilities and improvements. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) 104 Utilities --location of all major sewer, water or electrical lines and facilities. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) 11. Location of trees J' in diameter - six (6) feet from ground level. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) G, 12. Open Space - location and size of greenbelts, parks, common and recreational areas. (Shown on concept or detailed plan,) Par Plan i ' I 13, Screening - location, type and size of all fences, berms or screening features. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) Per Plan t++1 14, Development Schedule Iconcept plan) - showing specific date detailed plan will be submitted, date to start construction and complete construction, and rate of development. All dates should indicate month and year, Detail Plan submitted i ADDITIONAL REpUIREKENTS FOR A DETAILED PLAN I IS, Landscaping Plan - major features and types of landscaping to be used, See Plan i 5-6 r e ! : Development standards page 4 lb. Signs - show location, type and size on detailed plan; otherwise, signs must conform to Article 17 of the toning Ordinance. Will conform to Article 17 17. Sidewalks. (Shuwn on detailed plan.) ' 18. All information required for preliminary plat in accordance with Appendix A (Denton Development Code) of the Code of Ordinances. (A separate plat is required.) i 19. Development Schedule (detailed plan) - indicating start and completion of construction and the rate of development. All dates should indicate month s and year. Firestation: Start ct 1991 FiniQh n~f t999 Library-, To lie PatahliQhpA izy_[rTD 1 Shopping Centpr- cram 2.nn3 P4n4a, 20iJ f 1 ab 3/81 5-7 i r I tly f 1 II i , 1 w wru ...1 _ Ir1yyl.a~e~ r ~ r Iw•• n `r rI' ~Irw YM • INYI \'~1 \n~/w~rr.ll ur ww.tliY rl\ 11 rr T.1 hFY~+ .u • M Y~\ IM 11.1. R.Yr.Ywti w.Yr logo" 1~.1y~Y.r~ r M IN 1\~. IP 41 ,1.1../YV w. Y~ r..1. 11nMr YL.I YO 1\~ ~I~.I,..Y~w.fN , f ka" \~.r\ rn.~+ rr~ rYY M 1 w iY P.\. fiumm W M+~\ W[ N Yr1Y wtl h ~~Ik Y~V Yi1 ~~1 ~1.►w ~V. V [lFM[MIART /CNOOI IRACt 6"U VICNiC mAp, „Y.,.~rYlr.rr.nlYr✓ ! I rourONRla r/ „ I \c wr rwu Ir I ~ - - r ~ ~ , r.~. IM Y1 r Ii~MI . Nw1.11 ILrY.. I'U Y\ Y.7 _ ~ ~ Dr.wl \IYI NI\.. 4..n lc~ h I. 1 1it1 I o o c~ I e ~ rh ~ _ IIWI MHI IM.' - N.jH Iii i 1 ~1 i 77 I i F;M-7- ~ ti ~w A.I;NRFj I«! Ithi~l ttl~IfwY 7~ Y~.asi! \r III.. sI w \yl k`l, h.'iSP'!"I •e 4„r ,.i✓ l+..n ~'r\/,y,w R.Nw 11wf*# n•• /lid Oni cm . MOOR I.tl~1 /III IIH Ami w 1~•^'• i~~ ='iiliw•~ , C./wulUfR Slnlr lbOa 4i~TTV.In M11,.J ~'L.:• rr »rR I"~`~. a.arl,arRA•a,nl., 1• IMM1I S 1rMr~r f1f11.1I I'^ «\1\Mr"1"~Y~/\M1.\M~1y w. w t ;,mx.+arFSSSae~l,aeelf_ +.n I V .elA.wr rtlww,Yrw\r r1~««~. rVI\« i 1 i Z-40-016 TABLE OF PERMITTED USES RETAIL SALES ESTABLISHMENT: Any establishment wherein the primary occupation is the sale or rental of merchandise or goods in small quantities, in broken lots or parcels, not in bulk, for use or consumption by the immediate purchaser. For the purpose of this ordinance, to of beer and include mortuary ortfuneraleparlor~,toff-premiseasaleo wine, pawn shop, second-hand stores, used furniture or rummage sale, animal clinic or hospital with outside runs or pens. v Ci. } PERSONAL SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT: Any building wherein the primary f occupation is the repair, care of, maintenance or customizing of personal properties that are worn or carried about thers this are a physical component of the person. For the purpose t need ordinance, personal service establishments shall include booming not be limited to barber shops, beauty parlors, p g establishments, laundering, cleaning and other garment servicing establishmentn, tailors, dressmaking shops, shoe cleaning or repair shops, and other similar places of business. 1 , OTHER PERMITTED USES Eating Establishments Day Nursery or Kindergarten School Safe Deposit Boxes Public Library Business Schools Theater less than 500 seats Medical Offices Financial institutions ; Health Studios Travel Agency Professional Offices A Laundry Small Appliance Repair Shops Fire re station or Auto Repair, inside only: A facility Similar Public for the repair and maintenance of Safety Building motor vehicles, but does not Gasoline Service Station include rebuilding of engines or trapsmissions, or the restoring, painting or refinishing of auto bodies. 5-9 w ~ i M 4. n4FMM'~ I ~ DATE: 01/22/91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 3~( v TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council i PROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Z-90-012 - A DETAILED PLAN ON 0.6941 ACRES OF LAND. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of Z-90-012 (6-0). SUMMARY: This site has an approved concept plan for retail type uses. This is the first time a detailed plan has been submitted on this site. The applicant is requesting approval of this detailed plan in order to begin construction of a fast food restaurant. This site is immediately in front of the existing Target store. BACKGROUND: ♦P See History in the report. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: 5 Users of and adjacent land owners to the site. 1 1° 4 FISCAL IMPACT: None Reape lly su teds r' Prepared by: Llo d . Harrell A City manager Kar K. P Shari ' Urban Planner i Appr s t 1 Fr n its Robbi s, AICP y, Executive Director A, ! Planning and Development ?`p 2524x a. n Y\\ r f ; PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Case No.: Z-90-012 Meeting Date: January 22, 1991 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Sybra, Inc, 701 E. Plano Parkway, Suite 505 Plano, TX 75074 Current Owner: Golden Triangle Joint Venture, Inc. Requested Action: Detailed Plan for the purpose of a fast food restaurant. Location and Size: .6914 acres located at the northwest corner of Colorado Boulevard aad Loop 288, directly on front of the Target store. Surrounding Land Use: North - Commercial/Retail South - Commercial/Retail East - Commercial/Retail West - Commercial/Retail Denton Development Plan: Urban Center SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: Access by right turn only and at the median crossing from Colorado Boulevard, a secondary arterial, as shown. Utilities: Water, sewer and fire protection are adequate for this site. Drainage: There are no major drainage issues pertaining to this site. w (Case Z-90-012) Page Two HISTORY Council approved a "pad" site plan for this tract with the Target Store in September 1980. On December 13, 1990, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of Z-90-012. ANALYSIS The proposed development is located in a Major Activity r Center. According to the Denton Development Plan, these are the largest centers strategically located to encourage the concentration of commercial retail, office, light Industrial and multi-family housing. The submitted Detailed Plan reflects a fast food restaurant in an area that has been approved for retail/commercial type of uses. According to the Denton Development Plan, major activity centers have no limits on the number of trips generated by land use developments. Accordingly, an analysis of intensity for a development of a major activity center Is not done. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-90-012. ALTERNATIVES j Z. Approve petition with conditions 3. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Reduced copy of detailed plan 3. Minutes of Planninp and Zoning Commission Meeting on December 12, 1990 4. Ordinance 2487x _ n o- ~ a R1>T~ yvr r I lf[ S C/[}y I t~ t ATTACHMENT 1 M ~ / I ® {RANT 1 YAT{A TII{ATKhT I i Ahm TO t cQ~ t ~p POP* s 0 Q~ JJ ~ v •CAl1 NON "L OATt I1 ~4 ~!O r ~ ' Iw t a { [[1 09 MENUSOARO SIGN +...rr Iwr nRi•IL h Y01f YlC 1.•.i•t 1.KY\,C CI ,.IY III•IC•ll ~ I C•/ 1 p1 P[Y 11.•p.l YOGIiO• p •I.IC IIYI . --_._+_A tracer /.etula aar u•1 fllf lpY b•'j I .}_~C ~ ~1. •N•gylul 111 . ~ ~.1 IIII I.IN(.ll• 01 C .'.i YVy • 1 1 / ~ ,.t 101 C 110(f 1 r1(1 \ 'flellf J Atby*s 5199 1.111 K. 1/7 , I I.YI ~ / ttI/ II.YI IIIM NI ~ , II 07 DRIV£-TNRU SIGN II • F Ir r~11 YI. I 1 f \ Y pool, Yn Y YIY , I} •4 1 • If r 1.1m, poll ,~o 1 r! ~Vl~ t~~w tiiur f w11 IY-f.III II II. r04 \ N \ r+ r J ,rO T4\~ NUlrurrel rtlf rte Sr + fullrllq irro Ilrll r/Ip• r.rr •••t• /t Nn•.•nl Iw11r, ` `r y~ppr R [ OT LOGO SIGN - « w.r,•+r.rswr ~ 01 SITE PLAN ~ 1r1 i~T~~~,-~`\NIINNrlt lflfrMN1 ICI j pNIFM It4.K.111 ~ ~ rlrr /1►11 C>1 r wr 1 i _ i srmurg LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: NOTE: - L+Q.1 pF V14 NrF~ .11 [n•[I. Y.li 10 [I IO[. \Ill lex VlF 10.14[ F1111..V•4l1 ` W P•R IVI MI V•y x ~•1• •IOiI [Ileull [111 [[Ixi IVxi.. FV1111 .x0111.11F li.• 1•I[ [ WI YLI XY.I IRI (W M:' FI•I• ramrlY. atlol ral mt Frt. \e ee [ul[wu lau ILe n1i[.m oa u, u r mrwN u.Xy lair. mY♦uta M w~+iii Iwl+l .ilu. IIFI 1.! • ~ j yiYUI YXFr pwa LG I ' TREES: YIYIFVX11eI1M IM 1 f Ina. W +rw~.•1 wN.!♦W it w . yi 1l Yl~v~l.l 1 ~1 VLMI Iw. ll•~YI~~~. e. m^'i, r. v°w•.'•°rw lw. rw ..YI.LF•.wuro..~•4uw n.P1 ysi el ~I N aeI1r W1. MYIIIT XY i PARKING iOTS:~~ur~ ~,wN mT yywy r„ Il1LGt NFFIFG tOt W I\ ~MVWYIU•Yia'•F•NYwiV N W /Y r~m.a l... w.W, dw•w.r Cr M~wlww tllir i+i r,~ r aQ1yX Ya.IWMwOI•nl.ell rl O+ ~ .ru If r. aril O F•'F ~ Y 1 SCREENING: Allay's I dlF •wl^AIFy NFI e~♦ a•tll IO..u11. \ ' ~ , _ ,I Ill WF~ Y lewn.4a M N'(.Iw+F ~ 1I eM r.Fwa~~~vl Yl r; 1„XI, MI a!n i[il•~'.rl~Nw ~wYe PwK \ ~Y~NEIITYT,iY£•La vls•~ i'r• 4~.1 e7 i WUDS: r j .YI11 . ]II (w•la i dYF hll .lwalYI'I•• Y LIl1[1 a ~,r, S •1 • I 1 CREOIT v t • fj IwIFs! \ ~FIn r ullwalNYlr f i lG.i ~l~i 'ji F•i1 YY MF j I ! Ir ~slwl~rr '~"rtT11 d" !~I CS : l1 EI ~ t ~ Waale+ I : ~ ~ F Merl 1 w~l 1 \ •L,ti • ~ fl rr.l tog: KEYNOTE AREA TABULATIONS: } ' e `z''R'L ~~IO a• R4Ilmunnllorx ,.t y F : , $YOM, Inc. ' LrY,1 A i. , . 1, , L61xa TtRL S190 E p(: e.r [Ff-d1r) toot Y4YO Lit ,16111 ' w 31FC,}611i71Ehi5 o 1 • II MIF II r•M ~ FwY•!V•\MhWw~ ly reu.aaall I 7i~t ~1t OI DSCAPE PLAN r/rrr. LAN IaF1.e.Y11F111 fly. i~fi 1 • LAMCKNI lL A11 C7 ii► Y Iwe.r I,yatryylw ~:1 1 i fl 4 +LNTHKJ I FT ATTACHMENT 3 , Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission December 12, 1990 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas was held on Wednesday, December 12, 1990, at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 215 East McKinney, Denton, Texas. Present: Roy Appleton III, Euline Brock, Jim Engelbrecht, Ivan Glasscock, Judd Holt, and William Kamman Absent: Fran Morgan Present from Staff: Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning and Development; Jce Morris, Assistant City i.ttorney; Owen Yost, Urban Planner; Harry Persaud, Senior Planner; Jerry Clark, City Engineer; Karen Feshari, Urban Planner; and Olivia Carson, Secretary Chairwoman Brock called the meeting to order. 1. Minutes It was moved by Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht, r and unanimously carried (6-0) to approve the minutes of the requ'ar meeting of November 14, 1990. II. Z-90-012 Hold a public hearing and consider a detailed plan on part of Planned Development No. 6 for the purpose of building a fast food restaurant on Lot 2, Block 1, Target Addition, located at the Northwest corner of Colorado Boulevard and Loop 288. Five notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the site; one was returned in favor of the request. Staff Report: Ms. Feshari stated that the petitioner, Sybra, Inc., is petitioning for approval of a detailed plan of .6914 acres located within Planned Development (PD) 6. The surrounding land uses are commercial and retail. Access to the site would be by right turn only and at the median crossing from Colorado Boulevard which is a secondary arterial. Water, sewer and fire protection are adequate for the site. There are no major drainage issues pertaining to the site. Ms. Feshari showed the Commission slides of the site. She said that development of an Arby's restaurant is proposed. it will be located directly in front of Target. The Target site plan was approved for retail use in 1980. The proposed development is located in a major activity 1{ center, more specifically in the northern urban center. According to the Denton Development Plan (DDP), these are the largest centers strategically located to encourage the 3-1 i , DRAFT P&2 Minutes December 12, 1990 Page 2 concentration of commercial, retail, office, light industrial, and multi-f4mily housing. The submitted detailed plan reflects a fast food restaurant In an area that has been approved for retail and commercial types of uses. According to the DAP, major activity centers have no limits on the number of trips generated by land use developments. Accordingly, an analysis of intensity for a development of a major activity center has not been done. Petitioner: Jim Coker stated that he is the designer and representative for the development. He is available to answer any questions. The proposed layout is to maximize i parking and vehicle stacking for the drive-through. The single lane entrance will make it easier for customers to get to the building. Mr. Engelbrecht asked the reasoning behind the location of y the ingress/egress. Mr. Coker replied that they were trying to minimize conflict of traffic leaving the drive-through and trying to get into the parking area. Mr. Engelbrecht said that traffic coming out of Target and Michaels stacks up and he thinks there will be a problem with people trying to get out of Arby's and turn left into the stacked traffic. He wants the developer to be aware that this might also cause internal traffic problems at the Arby's site. He suggested moving the ingress/egress northward. Mr. Coker stated that he would discuss the suggestion with the owner. Mr. Kamman stated that he is concerned about another curb cut on Colorado Boulevard. He asked if there will be a turn lane. i Mr. Clark stated that the design is such that cars entering Arby's off Colorado Boulevard will take a free flowing movement at a traffic capable speed. This is done to keep traffic moving freely internally so that it will not stack on Colorado. Mr. Engelbrecht repeated that he believes there may be traffic problems associated with the development and that the developer should be aware of these up front. 3-? S 9rh'RW~ 1 DRAFT P&I Minutes December 12, 1940 Page 3 recommends conformance approvald with the condit on th at stated the staff with Article 17, B-Zoning. Ms. Brock asked about the 30' logo sign. Ms. Feshari said that it is in conformance with the sign easement fronting on ara drainage e allowed. Loopn 288 where 30' site signs has Mr. Kamman stated that he is also concerned about a traffic problem being created by cars entering off of Colorado. Ms. Feshari said that staff has worked on the design vith the developer. Mr. Clark said that the i288esis igee rallyo moving slow 288. Traffic coming from Loop because of the rise on Loop 288. They should not have to .uch more to enter Arby's. Their drive is } slow down v intended to be a high speed access. They are trying to J avoid signalizing the Target entrance on Colorado. Mr. Eninternal t trasked affic hat the problem. will have to do if there is an Mr. Clark said that there is not much that could be done. He discussed potential problems and solutions with Mr. Engelbrecht noting that there is stacking room to keep the delays on the Arby's Chair closed the public hearing. Decision: Mr. Gli,sscock noted that there are good points to the design that have been brought ut.ofHe o es they will work. He moved to recommend approval was seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht and unanimously carried 3-3 i I J r-. qi 4 uDyo ATTACHMENT 4 ORDINANCE N0. DEVE DETAILED PLAN F R DE ORDINANCE OF CITY 01' DENTONs TEXASi LOPMENTZONINGE DISTRICT DESIGNATION ANDA o.6941 ACRES OF LAND ER OF BOULEVARD AND LOOP 288;APRTED AT OVIDING EFORRA E ALTY~IN THEC14AXIMUUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. c') f WHEREAS, in 1980, in conjunction with the approval of the Target atone, the City Council approved a site plan for general and a proLoop per 288tcandd at the northwest corner of the retail uses for Colorado WHEREAS, 6ybra, Inc. has applied for a approval of new detailed plan for the property for use as an Arby's Restaurant; and WHEREAS, on December 120 1990, the Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval of the detailed plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the planned development district and detailed p be in Development Plan; NOW,THEREFORE comp THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS; criON I. That the 1 of the Target Addition is classified designation o as a planned f Lot develop,ment (PD) zoning district under the comprehen- sive zoning ordinance of the city of Denton, Texas. eFCTiON ii. That Exhibit A, attached to and roved as the incorporated into Dot& iled an for this ordinance by reference, is app endix B-Zoning o.' the district in accordance with article 11 of App the Code of Ordinances. SECTION L. That the City's official zoning map shall show the approved zoning district classification and use designation. That any person violating any provision of this cF~i,~ ON IV. ordinance shall, tuon hat a o $2 , 000. Each day provision of this dordinanceoiseviolated inviction, be shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. cF~ N V. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, an tin ofd tie City Secret r be hereby directed to cause the cap published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, tho official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) Ys of the date of its passage. 4-1 IVW S\ 1 Ia PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1991. i BOB CASTLEBEFIRYO MAYOR ATTEST: Gs JEN91FER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: y APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCHj CITY ATTORNEY BY., a . I i i 1 ,1 4-2 PAGE 2 , a ~I WWI t liPT I f rv:I[i 1*esj i J f i EXHIBIT A Detailed Plan for Fast Food Service Restaurant:, 1. Development Standards (4 pages) 2. Landscape Plan (1 page) ~ 3. Site Plan (i page) t i 4-3 PACE 3 I t TEL No.214-340-7`703 Nau.30.90 22:54 r.01 HALL.GRHPHICS 10V-JO-'90 SRI el t45 :ps ITY Cr DQrtOS IA TEL ? sbifkG-&M e3S0 POZ/O AiP eDIVILOPWIM STAMeAeO/ t:aee pw l DMIL PLASH ~1~•-5'~~g~3~ 1. eeatebabe et'tatebt et Wtesrs j T II 1. etatattsae tealestlee eelaeloe is 0oatotl 6oesloeeeet atUNt Ina MOM S BAN le total Prank of Actes le respeaef fletfl t 041 At, 40 We Do" Slid Total Ituteae of Aeree IS 1 sb fateel. of tt& tt :alai ftepaN Aetedee a. Nne1s fa11y fetNted _ 0. libels really Attached lteraANeest setab steel to Attec11ed fade/061eee/1e1e Let Lies 0o Ouplee a Nultl-pally _ to attlos go tfeleteorkasa /aisle he Centel Well l e Coaatol$4 30 011111 904gattlal t0 het) iA NNOW&l 1. *that 1040 frl R~f/t1M4Mff 4+E1 4-4 i 1 ~ I'. 4 i l Development Standards Page 2 5. off-Site information - adjacent or surrounding land uses, zoning, streets, drainage facilities, and other existing or proposed improvements. Shown on detailed plan. 6. Traffic and Transportation - indicate existing and proposed streets, parking lotsi loading areas, access points. Shown on 4etailed plan. i Projected Traffic Generation. (Based on traffic study, if required.) my *r i U1 W ff 7. Buildings 1l a. Approximate location. Shown on detailed plans E be Maximum heights j !R j . c. Minimum setbacks Shown on detailed plan. i i E I d. Maximum gross floor area (square feet) for nonresidentisls 8. Residential Subdivisions a. Number of units per acts (dansity)i/ be Numbet and location of lots: (Shown on coS opt or detailed plan.) c. Minimum sirs, width and depth of lout /((Shh"ITown on concept or detailed plan.) d. Minimum front, side and teat yard sei +ickss (Shown on concept or detailed plans) r 4-5 w ` X--- + - .l FALL_GRAPHICS TEL No,214-340-7703 Nov.30.90 22:55 P.02 PA 1 0 3 i o7 IDs I f Y OF DWCN UR . • ....8370 Pda 0S ~ 'TEL M7~OiiiF66-B7x ~ ; «1,p~ane aunlude i e6 water bad ormitaco -'VProalgab leaetlan or all eefettn ponds, latest fucadp 14441, otEOt rater retentlaa or Major dtelMeM facilities and lmprwts"ta. (shwa on concept or detailed plan.) If, Utilities - locnim of all major lower Wolof K electrical llne$ and !acuities. C (s"otg a 00"9011! Of detailed plea.) lie Location of tree. 30 fit dlwtet . Sig 4) het from Iff"d Iwel, (shwa ea teecapt Of dscelled pldg,) f Il, t►ea dpom . aoaalt" tad also of gems W100 puts, damages ace reolMrlonel etees, ishare om SNOOPS, at detalled pass.) Ars 31, kceea/np - loestlta, troll and else of 1 lease. OerMa er aero"I&O eastsrea, (shorn om oesoep or detailed plan.) 16 OerslePDMI kOedale leomoept flag) - of 1 peelfla pie detailed pea will he artmltted, date to start coetreetl aM teaplm aeaetreettea, set tees of dwelopwat, Alt dace Shetld teltoatf th and sins, AIIOM MAL *@gift to A OMPA3LPO PLAN to. LoAdsaft" Plan - Malec Net"so Sd t e of ladraptal to be odd. I .............................Y.. . 1 4-6 I 'r ~a a r Development Standards gage 4 16, Signs - show location, type and also on detailed plans other vise, signs must conform to Article 17 of the zoning Ordinance. - i S 17. Sidewalks. {ShoWn on detailed plan.) 16, All information required for preliminary plat in accordance Witt Appeadil A (Denton Development Code) of the Code of Ordinances. (A separate plat is required,) Slj$ 05 NA t' 19. Development Schedule (detailed plan) - Indicating start and completion of { truction and the rate of development. All dates should indicate month { 1 cons and year. Start dater March 1991 r i c' ab 3/67 4-7 1 r~ w M LANDSCAPE REOUIREMENTS: NOTE: a ra"'^~""r`~" A yy~.uu lwa. J.®M, NINdY till. 1. lY lI 1. NN IIII. I Y Y II. N I I N Y YI NY, 1 .N[.JIYwb Nll.IMJ IMI I. .WI I I.Y I.W..,NII I N i ~NrYEN N' "1 .HI YN1 NY~a.Y11.N IN I..Ia.. i YN, 1.1 101604 ..1. 1... 60w/1 Y.Iw aw.. 1J1 TREES: Mill w0'oot wMu.orwLuwuW EA NO LO{S: loan ►a 11 ie° LOT IrY.lY1 . w r. MM. Y-- .i~iiYirs T13 Q. 1wIw IlI. YYewrr.wl•.11. I.Y w mooto f) A SCREENiNO: aeL,'r L O ....w.=~1.w. \ rl ..1..I+ 1 Li,ysr~l,:.':YI~: ~i .st±l~ Z. r t t .Y MWIW .YO,1!FMT I ~ 1 ' CREDtT• `1 ~ e r 1 1' . wlNwlili r„+s+rn I J f KEYNOTE AREA TABULAMNS: { - m 13 W Y.Yw.Jwi O,JJ w,,.Y.a ! I N I ~j I 'RiS:'Y OOIS lj ~0 ~ BYBRA, Me. 1 d:Ji{• Fw1Y K~1M. K.1..Y.I+w~n1._, ,OyL ~.Y,° ~ Y TR3Aj1E71M1I5 w Zi•1'IT.7 ; J',~}yq}{1 W LC W. ~ F A.'.'Y.wY.I NFYww. woo, JlY I.I.I w ' 111 K}SSS ;•y ~rYM Oi LANDSCAPE PLAN w.11 IR..1 rNN«. eu~1r •1.1 , wl~w~,'-I:_.-• 1~~>♦i ray j~~i'-'~"'C. LW°ttA/l °IAM G~ . yr rv.,.wn.rvuw\Ywry } t i ti i t ~ N I I I 1 f ! v a 04 MENUBOARD WA FLINT •IIC14l. • ~µlil r•11'. ALL 1.•IM• Intl• H 11 •IN lrlw•ll • - 1II I IIK• I I W II .OMINII 11•w M•I r 11K ~1 t1RCRt r1/RIMI lot ••IIr nIe,IN r••1 1 11i 1 Inlw.I lw ' ~ nn r+• Ilnl .It• 11 wN• • . •'••{r•N•{ ' U' C- 1 •r1YH MKI I •.r' n •w111.1 M • w: 1 I . , .I .r ~ My}'s 8111, ' 4. r IN. Mr nrwlrl i `D Ir. 13 DMVE-THtU SaN \ .,~~•r u.. ~Ir ILw •t• r f \ _ t•• ' r MI, u1r ~ LN4 Lord IN. 14% q 1 ?i, f : LLI Mf 11111 i I ~ 1 J r or so. to. Now /I0/ Mnlwrlnllan ~i~l°nle trw Ins lrtl°/ 'RMK N..r IKII IrK11M•NLI IIw IN\\ f ON LOGO SIGN 01 One CLIU1 0*4 to Moo" j to 11 f • II \ III - 1111 KIM C1 'uuw oral of III l r~ DATE: 01/22/91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT J,0- TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager ' SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 305 MOUNTS STREET A HISTORIC LANDMARK UNDER ARTICLE 28A OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE (H90-0011 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval (5-0). SUMMARY: The property located at 305 Mounts Street is of historical, architectural, and cultural value to the City and it is worthy of historic designation. BACKGROUND: The current owners of the property, Brian and Vicki Morrison, have filed a petition for Historic Landmark Designation (H). The Historic Landmark Commission considered the petition and recommended approval to the Planning and Zoning Commission. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Not Applicable. FISCAL IMPACT: r If approved, the property will be eligible for 501 reduction in City { taxes for a 30 year period. I Reapec ully su led: Prepared bys Llo d V. Harrell City Manager Harry Persaud, AICP Senior Planner r AppARObt,-ffe4T1j111CP Pr Executive Director Planning and Development 17180 1 ~jr\ r f ~ i t ' 1 I ~ I I STAFF REPORT To: Dento.i City Council Case Ho.: H90-001 Meeting Date: January 22, 1991 GENERAL INFORMATION,' Applicant: Vicki and Brian Morrison I 305 Mounts Street t Denton, Texas 76201 Current Owner: Vicki and Arian Morrison j Requested Action: Historic Landmark (H) zoning designation i Location and Size: The property is located on 0,314 acres at 305 Mounts Street, Denton Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single Family South - Multifamily and Single Family (MF-1) EAsL - Denton High School (2F} West - Single Family (2F) r Denton Development Plan: r Low Intensity Area #116 SPECIAL INFORMATION Article 28 A-1 Of the City of Denton zoning Ordinance defines a historic landmark as any building, structure, site, district, area of land of architectural, historical, archeological or cultural importance or value which the City Council determines i shall be protected, enhanced and f preserved in the the culture, prosperity, education, and interest he j people, ► general welfare of the Section 28 A-2 of the above referenced ordinance sets out the policy and purposes of historic pceservacion. E (a) To protect, enhance, and perpetuate historic landmarks which represent or reflect distinctive and important elements of the City's or State's architectural, archaeological, cultural, social, economic, ethnic, and political history, and to develop appropriate settings for such places. I i i (Case H90-001) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued) (b) To safeguard the City's historic and cultural heritage, appropriate embodied and reflected in such historic landmarks by regulations. (c) To stabilize and improve property values in such locations. (d) To foster civic pride in the beauty and accomplishments i of the past. (e) To protect and enhance the City's attractions to tourists and visitors, and provide incidental support and stimulus to business and industry. (f) To strengthen the economy of the city. (g) To promote the use of historic landmarks for the culture, prosperity, education, and general welfare of ) the people of the City and visitors to the City. ` ANALYSIS i The building located at 305 Mounts Street is of historical, architectural, and cultural value to the City of De..ton and it is worthy of historic designation. 1, The house was built in 1898-1899 and represents a late victorlan architectural style with East Lake details, distinctive Its features n clapboardsidingwithfishscale details# tallbwindowsf, with stained glass, East. Lake entry door with an adjacent diamond window, formal entry hall, staircase with two landings, turned ballisters, wood floors, high ceilings, wide mouldings with bull eyes and base Locket three fireplaces with oak mantels, wrap around porch and second floor sitting porch. 2. The original owner of this house was Robert Noble Mounts, son William H. Mounts one of the original settlers to Denton in 1857. Many streets in the City were named after members of the Mounts familyt Mounts, arbriefHhistorySofa305nMountst. (See attachment #3 for 3. The house which abuts tho oak-Hickory Street Historic District served as a Manse (parsonage) for the Central Presbyterian Church, now St, Andrews Presbyterian i WWI (Case H90-Opl) Page Three ANALYSIS (continued) Church, between 1919 and 1943, in 'Manners of the Manse" a biogr305 aphyooftCharlesaEstes, Pastor of the Central Presbyterian Church Snow St, Andrews) and resident of this house 1930-1935, 4, The house is believed to be built by J. Wilson, a { contractor and lumber yard owner, RECOMMENDATION ~ i The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of r H90-001 by a vote of 5-•0. The Commission felt that the building at 305 Mounts Street met the following criteria for historical landmark (H) designation: (1) Character, interest, or value as part of the ;f development heritage, or cultural characteristics of the City of Denton, (2) Embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type of specimen, (3) Relationship to other distinctive buildings, sites or areas which are eligible for preservation according to j a plan based on architectural, historical, or cultural motif, (4) Identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the City, State, or United States, ALTERNATIVES 1, Approve petition 2. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1. Locatiin Map 2. Map of uaw-Hicory Historic District i 3, Historical summary 4, Letter from Susan Nail, great granddaughter of William H. Mounts i i i r ` N rye (case H90-001) ! y Page Four r 1 ATTACHMENTS (continued) 1 5. ~ Minutes of the Historic Landmark Commission meeting of November 12, 1990 b. Minutes of the Plan 1990 ning and Zoning Commission, Novembor 28, 7* Ordinance i I I f 1 I f I 1 j r ttY i 3422] i 1 ~ 1 i ATTACHMENT 1 1 H-90-0 N t s I_ I Y a n o s • , f , s I `i f f, ~ I I e }nfi•!f Y';il;.};~5:.'r:~d:'r'r:•I+': $'~i:1' ~ M I • I°Ajar:f~~l~:;`ir;:~::y;i.,,~:,,,?;;•'r,; r + ✓Y + f f f! r f i ~ F• H n N 10 N 13 Its m AT"" 14 I ~ 11 1 • •.I I rrtf P'3>a.r; ~ ,r" ~WrW~ •.1 oil t = 47{ M f 1 ~ I t l i 1 t 1 M Mf' M Md on U t 1 1 t 1 I i I t 1 • t 1 1 M • M 11 It 11 b • • f M 11 16 f 1 7 • UL _r rW rr.w r-tom rr , 1-1 I SCALE CATS b A8,-HICKORY HISTORIC DISTRICT DENTON , TEXAS NORTH ~ Y ~ i r, r I 1s I 'A'• T d I~w, C7 Y Y tl i1 f~,. h1A rill r r ~ r a ~ r 77 1Mtl~ OAK 11 s,~r~ ~ ~ # ~ ! 1 • T ~ k`'. wa 329 ' ' "Ir MICKOR E r 11 f W ii rL, Y : ~ k ~ i " ~ i hl ,4 r 7 I R . 1 ATTACHMENT 3 r A Brief History of 305 Mounts The Robert Mounts home at 305 Mounts In Denton has a rich history, with close family ties to the very roots of Denton's beglning. The contributions of the families related to the heritage of this house havo.gons largely 'unnoticed In the existing histories although each has played a significant role In the shaping of Denton. The Robert Mounts house, and Its legacy are equally worthy of preservation. Following Is a condensed accoupting of the history of this home. J. W. Gober moved his family to Clear Creek In 1857 r, where he built a private schoolhouse for his children. He engaged Miss Mattis E. Haynes as teacher In hjs school, She had recently come to Texas from Mississippi with her family headed by Reverend John Haynes. He became the third pastor of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church. Soon after her arrival Miss Mattle Haynes met and married W. H. Mounts, a 4 merchant who had Just moved to Denton with the founding of the new county seat. In August of 180 their first son, Robert Noble Mounts, was born. Two years later, a daughter, Emma Belle Mounts, was born. The Mounts family had acquired a tract of land west of the town of Denton out of the William Neill original 100.6 acre survey. William Woodruff had acquired much of the Neill survey, and upon his death the land was divided Into blocks of land and sold to pay hie outstanding debts. One block containing about eighteen acres was sold to Joseph Bledsoe. He built a house on this land between 1869 and M 1861 which he sold In that year to Emily Mounts, This house faced south and appears on the 1883 'Birds Eye View of Denton' map drawn by Augustus Koch. The road leading to this house later became Mounts Avenue. W. H. Mounts bought this house from Emily Mounts In 1867. This was to become their homestead for the next several decades. The Mounts family was very Important to the development of early Denton. In adddltlon to her fathers minlstry► Mattis Mounts formed the first Sunday School 'in Denton In 1868. W. H,,Mounts sold general merchandise on the west side of the square with his partner W. C. Baines. His daughter Emma married W. B, Gregg who owned the vast Gregg Ranch. Mattis Mounts also opened the first kindergarten In the southern part of Denton In 1892, and her younger daughter Sena was one of Denton's first publIO school teachers. Sena married W. W. Wright, son of Cow Wright. 3-1 1 W. H, Mounts died In 18849 and In 1887 Erma Mounts Gregg bought a strip of land off the southern end of his estate. 1 She set aside a forty foot wide strip which later became Mounts Street and Is now known as Gregg Street. Her husband died In 1889 and she asked her older brother, Robert, to manage Gregg Ranch. In 1,890 she remarried, to Dr. Cuvler Lipscomb, a Denton physician. They built a beautiful Victorian home on the present site of the McClurkan home on West Oak Street, and they later sold the land she purchased from her father's estate to their son Cuvler'Jr. In 1891 Robert Mounts married Nannis Lee Chrlsta) whose family had had roots in Denton for many years. In 1892 or 1893 Mattis Mounts home burned and she rebuilt In 1898 the house that now stands at 403 Mounts. Robert Mounts bought the land from Cuvler Lipscomb, Jr. and built the house at ' 308 Mounts. Since Its erection, this house at 306 Mounts has had many owners, and few held the property for any duration. One exception is the Central Presbyterian Church which grew out of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church mentioned earlier. They purchased the house In 1919 as the mansq for their ministers. They held the property until 19431 and the house was occupied by the 0. H, Brammer family from the mld-194009 to the mid-19600s. The rich histories of the families involved In this house as well as Its distinctive architectural character have earned It a place In the historic presetvation of Denton. i, 3-2 i i ti r ATTACHMENT 4 Tr►a„spf~; ~ no+ts ac+cr~ {r; far Ctari~y] ,luly qo ~ f)F.gr Mr, Morrison, I shall refer ~0 Main+' homes (as Rob" 4 Flita6ci~5. Robe*4$ ; +%as f+t 014165#' child of RIiza6e4h k Bill Movn4. My 6radMo~er F4 dell MouA+s (Gr9j. Lip`'an~b) was 'fie next child } closer in age +a m, j Ceti: closer in 9se fo wiuiarti CIM99 -kkan to Cuvite l.ibstom6j She askej him Ced., Ro~ MN'%+S] to Manage Dregs p4w.~ of t{+e deal{, of wM. 8. CzrelO (ker husband 4 my grandfa4her) There is a marker a+ Cvw RAK41 a6A }eh Miles west of DM+04 4 ntar kru,n, Rob} buifl your hose, E4lL's hen+a. hungrd, It was right- In Middle of Moun}s ave, In Momis Ave. was +he road leading +n their, koft*,. It faced 6&.41, Ttie _ back ya+d- (.leach artkard a+c. was near f4+e. old oen+cw% N;gh School. 5 `-t F-lis Moun}y W 1 ~Ift=. N home +ha} burned . We always ref"i& b Grow-4mAer Moun4s a5 ba'ng on +ke hill # 41AP back doped down so quickly. 9rAwt8Mo+Er married Or. upscomb af4er +fte. deA+k of 4)0"- Scow , ~mq3. she was only +wenfy et914 4 a very we +ky wpow young woman, My MAer, Susan bftid ~reyq, w45 one, o~'4R1ree. ckildrtn. She, Emma, bui 1+ a beauMI vic6rica4 home, on Oak Shree.+, CAevr'o%, house( bAm scrwA4s "rfers, e4w. e:ILY on +ht 31gh+ of +4 Me Gurkan home on Oak 5}, 1} 6A*TW, GnandrKO~h~rS home The. donna. ton w, P4, your home } %e Gre.M Ranrh being Root. MOUA+y m4Y1O4td 6n°99 Ra»e~ far many years, Ne 4 Mr. Frank Tempk,'ns (Ioke his 6ft4W-1n-law} sever O+her- y°U43 rnen rode ikon h down 4n Max~w ~ Caught wild horsey 4 dry +he►n ail +~,e way b 6ack }a Greg, RqAd~. They brake 4w^ in a veed -K+ a}- +6L rand,, Wild rY 66iss, I am sure. }hail- Rohm. Movn4S wab in ills earl he. 6u'(+ 41kis horns Led: horn Augus} Z4, 18633 * Y' +h e;, kyses1 bw*44* by ^+e+hf he only gave if• up wAfA My PAftn}s 4-Z zfo~ I 1 I rnar+ned. ~a#- was M03. I ca>Id be v-fq wrong (here, I am sure yovr da4es are eomck, AF {4'a4- 4+mt- Gaegg %nek con+4i'Aed abo~ -Rirr}eev% }ir+pA4mp Ctcre9. ! Yes {4.+e 64e+ emert,45 aboo4 +i+e ©wsley kaft%e are covec.+ Cxcept +he 4erm " hundreds of acres " skoutd have been +kovsgnds of acres, of +ke on'gcnal 41w+1 etgkf 46usorJ acres +hene, tins a6ov4 Fqew 4ov54nJ le4 a+ 4k4 -time, My mo4+erj ker- 6,-o4~ f sis4r inheC♦•ed • is wken +>1ey becan.e of age. I have. nevtr heard o f+e {ern GM" lease.". If was always +4,t Be 4 e* Ced: noWk a~ 4ke i bo44an p~ 4{~e Qa~e: 'k 8uPklo 64yoa 4 Colorado R%;Iroadl survey. INS I survey was done by D►aAks Gregg in 1853. D. Gregg wits a Surveyor f,r, +1een in Kou$4on. They warmed 4o p ktrnvv,(amd. NY- sel"d Dentin Co. Hi-5 Survey, 4tA(A rode all +ke Way ,en, Hous4on Yt'a wagon 4 korseback. l have at Ways kea~ 46ukide bob [eds R*6&+3 Mou4s 641-ym- horse„ Perkaps Bob's grvkndson could help y". Mr. WiC. Moun4s 2'9S RAeArd St. A44,ems, GA 3OWS D;ll I~as his 6oc:6rA4e k is a Pre +e-rtoan minioher, A grea+ person . Gb&4 Mov^ s married Nannie 4+ysW. one 04= +he, dd C6rys61 hoMts is on 4ke corner (eash We.) of KvaMs Ave, 4 Oaf. *rct+. Yes - " ah S rooen kouse 6vi 14 ov% (and I mme&a4 it nor4 % was Elir"S kome. (Moun}s-Wrq'5 4'). *V den'+ Yftr +ry for a k4ar•icol mmt4,er for your han+e., You 3us4- 49h4 be ale +o get i~ far- Ro6t, Mov441 in4rcduung ike Rrs~ Wild (ALJO v+gs Wb DeAv% Co, I Wald be. Your My Source as i~- is nok on recoe4. l have a lawg 6r6`-Y wl iak includes Uncle. Solo 4 04(e. Frank TompWrls playing poker wj'PA Prank ~ Jew& Ja^vs. I k4ve. "`Y 9rAV+d~r+4l,crrs poker {able 4k4- 4+*j used. eke JAmes boys were in +rov0e. i n miswr:( so ~s,ey k•d out +n tt^40n 4`v~ awk, k, 4-2 s r.. 1 Mi;.5W1~ A~ MY home was a+ 407 Peal 5+ree+. I lived +bere from *vve Years +o above' Am, Corta+ fvn, my GVVAdMof~err Fmilyy mavr►+s We MovhFs ~''I° 40 was Ljeoy generous wife, her money +a he,- Ttmil mainly , Alt 4Ae deeds c{c, WtM mainly offer my grAoxd4Aev-s wt+en mY mo er• married - (q03. 5ke Was AA of cage. "en ske. Married . Her- cAv gmey +o ld her, +v 44 ct fn"& y trwwi+ +o ge+- her i4cri+tthc;?, l am Sirr`y l wasn't aKy more kelp fa you. (arY, so glad S~,mesne ir\ beh~rt +s In+eresf~ed in m ~amil~ , l ar► rtlways { rerd~ f*, kelp Gov af- any fie y , Do nar4- hesi+►u +a colt ort me, ' Si ncer,e ly , Suso% S;,nn,ar~s Naf! Core99 # was eQencd Nkcn ,„y grwrdn+Aev, 6v;(}- her l ome en oak Sknee+, !%e gave 4he. alley -fo 4101a a#/, Ced,. WD Vol. 33 Pg. 3z, Apry l 12, 18871 Eke ked +o have. an exit 4r, her carriages, e+r., I+- Nay called Gft3g Alley Poo-yeas. remem6or• walking fa my grAKd mO41 " home Ae back way. A+ your house 'Ke- sand 4 5fi'44 burvrs were so 441ick I could kaojly make i+. EN z. Movoti+s gave farad +o *t c►fy Jos+- wes4 of +he c4c( Der~~n .Sr. Nigh far a "s~ar,dp;pe'~. Wafter ,y}ar+age. 'Ihe c~(y /was Sel gno,ft~f"ut fhaf 4ey d4ni f cAarge tier far, ov4er use dvrir►9 i~ef li'rL-kme, t 'rtk i~ very Uni jve n'4r iAovn+s Ave. was naMed ~r My 9rea+ 6ftAjQAer-1 Gre99 6+- Lror my 9~►~d~a~,er- ' l~laynes 4, Pbe My area -drea+ jeAAA.4her Ced: Jol1n H and s ~a+E,er of Mitabe.4, Mounfs~, Mt WAS Nrt, MOVA-k -4kAer, 4-3 1 You should leave 4ke book "5 40A 43ass" Okla. Press, If MeAo-ts Dro t4PSCom6- 14wue.546ries above` ~irn cL~so. 1 Tank c~ov far- ,c pticfu~-es. They ctr 14N ink 6rca, I8so ib abou~ +4e. fi'me •Fke wild Mvs s wcre 6r^ovg~ kf, Ana b"n Co, by tab r4.vrtFs nk Torhpkc'~so oo S. Ro I i 1 4-4 1 } A ATTACHMENT 5 MINUTES Historic Landmark Comaission DOM A FT, November 12, 1990 The regular meeting of the Historic Landmark Commission of the City of Denton, Texas was held at S:00 p.m. in the Planning j Conference Room of the Municipal Building, 21S E. McKinney, on Monday, November 12, 1990. Present: Mike Cochran, Joe Bailey, W.A. Barker, Gaylen Fickey, f and John Kimmey Absent: Judith Abbott, Rita Holcomb, Janet Shelton, and Gerald Stone Present from Staff: Harry Persaud, Senior Planner; Joe Morris, f Assistant City Attorney; and Donna Baker, Planning Technician Chairman Cochran called the meeting to order. 1. Consider approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of October 8, 1990. It was moved by Mr. Barker, seconded by Mr. Kimmey and unanimously carried (5.0) to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of October 8, 1990. II. H-90-001 - Hold a public hearing and consider a petition by Brian and Vicki Morrison for historic landmark designation at 305 Mounts Street. Chairman Cochran opened the public hearing. PETITIONER: Brian Morrison stated that he felt thb a`pp-TicaEion was very thorough and that he would like to see the Commission approve their application for. historic designation. He added that he would answer any questions that the Commission may have. Mr. Cochran stated that this was the first submittal of the new historic designation applications. He added that he hoped this specific application would be used as a model. r. Cochran added thhat he was glad to see the enthusiasm that went into the application. Mr. Cochran asked the applicants to transcribe the letter from Mrs. Hall so that it could be used in the backup for the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council meetings. This request was due to the fact that the woman wrote in green ink and was very difficult to copy. Hr. Cochran asked what the screening material on the house is. Mr. Morrison replied that there were aluminum storm windows and an aluminum screen door. He added that a wooden screen door would be more appropriate for the house. 5-1 t HLC Minutes November 12, 1994 Page 2 DRAFT l~ i Mr. Cochran stated that since the door would be an architectural feature of the building, it would be i necessary for the applicants to come back for a certificate of appropriateness. Mr. Morrison agreed. i Mr, Kimmey asked why in Exhibit C the applicant talked about the mechanic's lein at 403 Mounts and stated "it is believed to exist in the mechanic's loin" He asked if it was found in the index but not in the loin records. Mr. Morrison stated that it was in the loin record but he stated "believed" in the application because he was under the assumption that the loin belonged to the Mounts-Wright house upon the legal description in the mechanics loin Itself. Mr. Kimmay stated that the word "believed" belonged to the house then and not the loin record. Bill Morrison agreed. Mr. Kimmay asked if there was a water well on the i property. Mr. Morrison stated that he understood, from a discussion with Jay Jagoe, that the well stood at the southwest corner, where the Calhoun Mounts Street gym is and that it was donated by Mattie Mounts, the matriarch of this family. She donated about forty square feet of I land for its erection. Mr. Kimmay asked if Mr. Jagoe gave any indication that there may be an abstract for the house, Mrs. Morrison replied that Mrs. Brammer, the owner of the home in the 1940'x, had the abstract but has since thrown it away. Mr. Kimmay asked if they could get an abstract foam 1 Stewart Title. Mrs. Morrison stated that Stewart Title 1 said it was ppossible but that it would be very difficult. Mr. Morrison tried about two years ago and was unsuccessful, Mr. Cochran stated that since a change in personnel, the applicant's chances may be more successful. Mr. Cochran asked if the applicants came across any information on Christian College that used to be across the street from 305 Mounts. Mr. Morrison said very little. He did research at the library and found a few clippings but nothing substantial. Mr. Cochran stated that he believed the college eventually became Abilene Christian College. Mr, Morrison agreed. 5-2 ( ik HLC Minutes November 12, 1990 Page 3 D Mr. Persaud asked if there was any significance in J.B. Wilson's work as a builder in Denton. Mr. Morrison stated that in the vertical files he found a clipping showing that Mr. Wilson owned a lumber yard where the old post office now stands at McKinney and Locust. Mr. Bailey asked if the applicants checked with St. Andrews for any records. Mr. Morrison said that he ' had been to the library but did not find anything very significant. f IN FAVOR: None. j OPPOSED: None. Public hearing closed. RECOMMENDATION: Mr. Persaud stated that in light of the criteria required in Article 18A of the Zoning Ordinance, staff recommended approval. DISCUSSION: Mr. Cochran asked that the Commission look at Exhibit F. The Commission went down the list which showed the criteria used in Historical Landmark Designations. Mr. Kimmey stated that he had a problem with item four showing that J.B. Wilson was an architect or master builder whose individual work has influenced the development of the city, He stated that he did not recall much work being done by J.B. Wilson. Mr. Morrison replied that he was able to find some records regarding J.B. Wilson but not much. Mr. Cochran stated that he did not feel that item four should be stricken but that further research on J.B. Wilson be done. The Commission agreed. DECISIONS It was moved by Mr. Fickey and seconded by r. ar er to recommend approval of a historic landmark designation at 30S Mounts Street. The vote was called by roll call as follows: Gaylen Fickey - aye W.A. Barker - aye Joe Bailey - aye John Ktmmey - aye Mike Cochran - aye Motion carried unanimously (5-0). 5-3 r s t it ATTACHMENT 6 P&Z Minutes November 28, 1990 Page 2 II. A_59 Consider making a recommendation to the City Council concerning the annexation petition of Millwood Development Corporation and the Henry S. Miller Trust for 1367.12 acres located at the intersection of Allred Road and I-35WI and abutting I-35W. Staff Report: Mr. Sees* reported that the Planning and Development Department has received petitions from Millwood , Development Corporation and Henry S. Miller for the annexation of contiguous tracts of land totalling 113367.12 acres. Annexation of these tracts into the Denton city limits will facilitate zoning for mixed use developments. The City j Council adopted an annexation schedule on Cctobor 16, 19906 setting the date, time and place for public hearings with regard to the proposed annexation and they directed staff at that time to prepare a service plan for the area. The first public hearing on the proposed annexation was held before the city Council on November 6, 1990. At this hearing no one spoke against the proposed annexation. The second public hearing before the City Council was held on November 20 1990, and again, only th• applicants spoke, noting to Council that' they would be seeking zoning. The site was proposed early this year for the Matsushita project, and it is located in Enterprise Zor,e 01 approved by the Texas Department of Commerce. Ms. Brock asked how the area meets the criteria for an enterprise zone. Mr. Besse replied that the criteria for an economically depressed area does not mean that the whole area has to be depressed. The area known as "Cement City" is included within the enterprise zone. That area has low incomes and a high unemployment rate. Areas that are able to be developed are included along with the area that is difficult develop. He added that staff recommends approval of the annexation. No one was present to speak on the annexation. Chair closed the public hearing. Decisions Mr. Kamman moved to recommend approval of A-59. i Seconded by Ms. Morgan and unanimously carried (5-0). III. H-90-001 Hold a public hearing and consider making a recommendation to the City Council concerning a petition by Vicki and Brian Morrison for Historic Landmark designation at 305 Mounts Street. 6-1 i i I• P&2 Minutes November 28, 1990 Page 3 Staff Reports Mr. Seems reported that the surrounding land uses are of a residential nature on three sides and Denton High School is located on the east side of the tract. He reviewed the definition and criteria of a historic landmark with the Commission. He showed the Commission slides of the house, noting that it abuts the historic district and has a tax value of $67,001. The house is associated with an { established family of Denton County. If the historic designation is approved, the house will be eligible for a 50% city tax exemption. Ci Petitioners Brian Morrison presented the Commission with a brief history of the house and its owners. Ms. Brock asked about the columns on the house. Mr. Morrison explained that the current concrete porch replaced the original wooden one. The concrete is beginning to crack and some of the columns have shifted. He hopes to replace the porch with wood in the future. In favors Mike Cochran, chair of the Historic Landmark Commission, urged the Commission to look favorably on the Morrison's petition. He said that the house is worthy of historic designation and that the Morrison's have done a great job preparing the application. Besides the tax benefits to the owners, they will also achieve a sense of dedication to the community. On question, he explained that a historic designation and the historic district are very similar but are separate items. The regulations for historically designated structures are similar to the regulations for the historic district. There are restrictions on alterations to the facade. Any architectural change requires that a Certificate of Appropriateness be issued by the Historic Landmark Commission. The designation goes with the house and will still apply if ownership changes hands. Ms. Brock asked if the house could be tnoluded in the historic district. Mr. Cochran said that the Morrison's have expressed interest as well as some of the other neighbors. The neighborhood is becoming more owner occupied. There were none present to speak against the petition. Recommendations Mr. Seems stated that staff recommends approval of the designation. 6-2 1 ~ i S 1 t 1 P62 Minutes November 28, 1990 Page 4 I Decision= It was moved by Mr. Appleton, seconded by Mr. Kamman, and unanimously carried (5-0) to recommend approval of H-90-001. a IV. 2-90-010 Hold a public hearing to consider rezoning 14.198 acres from Agricultural District to Planned Development i District on property located at the southwest corner of US Highway 77 at its intersection with Riney Road for the purpose E of a mixed use development of multi-family, office, and general retail. j Twelve letters were mailed to property owners within 200 feet, one was received in favor, and one was undecided about the request. Staff Report: Ms. Feshari presented the staff report (attached) and showed the Commission slides of the site. Mr. Kamman asked the purpose of the road realignment. Mr. salmon explained that according to the subdivision Regulations, a development must access off of a looser road if possible. The current alignment of Riney Road at Highway 77 causes a sight and distance problem. The new alignment will be at the Texas instruments (TI) signal light. Riney will be a collector street, 411 back-to-back. The abandoned section will be divided down the center and revert back to the property owners on either side. Ms. Brock asked it the light will operate to allow pedestrian access. Mr. Salmon said that it has not been addressed. Ms. Brock asked about the surface of the hike and bike trails. Mr. Salmon said that the trails will be in an easement and will have a durable surface, possibly asphalt or sealed gravel. This system is an alternative too sidewalks and will be finalized at the detailed plan stage. ; 4 Mr. Applston asked if any expansion of Riney Road west to Bonnie Brae is planned. Mr. Salmon said not at this time. 6-3 1 ~ yy i 3t.I M'TY R H . ' S R.vi i..Iy i hiito ATTACHMENT 7 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, DESIGNATING THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 705 MOUNTS STREET AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK UNDER ARTICLE 28A OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. t- WHEREAS, the Historic Landmark Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton have recommended that the property herein described be designated as a historic landmark in the City of Denton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I, That the building and land located at 305 Mounts r Street, the land being more particularly described in Exhibit A p' attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby designated as a historic landmark under Article 28A of the comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION Ir. That said property herein described shall be indicated upon the zoning map of the City of Denton as a historic landmark by the letter "H", and the property herein described shall be subject to all of the terms, provisions and requirements of Article 28A of the Comprehensive Zoning ordinance of the city of Denton, Texas, and such designation shall be in addition to any other such designation established in the City's zoning ordinance applicable to such property, SECTION III. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each such parson shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be punished within the limits above. SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from tho date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within Ten (10) days of the date of its passage. 7-1 . , . Mal r I A 11 y~ PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1991. j i f BOB CASTLEBERRY, ~yOR cl, ATTESTI JENNIFER WALTERSO CITY SECRETARY BYt APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMI DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCHO CITY ATTORNEY BYI D. i f t 1 7-2 PAGE 2 Y' LEGAL DESCRIPTION ,YO144~,~pfGE4~'7 • ~ Uhibit "A" j LEGAL 0ESCR1PTt0H Ail that certain trace, lot, of percet of lend situated [a the V1111144 Nall iculaeSurvey.ly dumbed >I, as follows, and Countli d! Denton, Texas, and beieE more patt4 ISONN1NO at a steel pia at the,bicU of a•concrsts walk at the ietersetetoa of the North line of Cron street with thii West .line of mounts Atacusl THENCE S 68.14' W with the North, tide of sald,'Crep Street 160,04 Net to a steel pin at the Southeast cornas.o!'a'lot described to a deed leas Central Ptesbyteria, Church, U.S.A. to J.6.,.f4tris on July 200 19266 sad recorded is Volute 203, Page Sfls Dud Records of said Cotjatyl THENCE North 99.3 feet to a fence corner at the back of a concrete curb at the Northeast corner of said Partly LOCI THENCE East with a fence an the South line of a lot described le a deed free 9490 Edwards to Alvln Hill to Nay of 1915 and recotdsd in Volute 141, tap 213, Dud Ricardo of said County, 140.0 felt to a steel pin at the Sack of a Concrete walk oa the Vest line of Nouace Avon-it; THENCE South with the. Wait line of :!aunts and of said concrete -jalk 96.0 test to the plate of belinnlnE. i i i s f 2131k/3 7-3 1 F p.. li( R' f DATES 01/Z2/91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 7 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell$ City Manager SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY REPLAT OF LOT li BLOCK Ai AND ADDITIONAL UNPLATTED LAND# INTO LOT 1Ri BLOCK A OF THE DENTON BIBLE CHURCH ADDITION j PECOMMENDATION: r 1 The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval at its meeting of January 9, 1991 (6-0). l SUMMARY This is an 9.578 acre tract located on the south side of University Drive at its intersection with the proposed Nottingham Road. E4 BACKGROUND: The property is zoned single family (SF-7)0 and development is anticipated of a place of worship (and related functions) along with associated parking. An existing 18 foot easement will be abandoned per this plate r City services and facilities, including water, gaei sanitary sewer) telephone, electrical, and solid waste, are available or planned for, The adjacent portion of Nottingham Drive is scheduled to start construction in 1991. The replat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED! None at this time. FISCAL IMPACTS j The church, via the platting process, will fund sidewalks along the proposed Nottingham Drive. Public improvements includes approximately 1330 linear foot of concrete sidewalks approximately 200 feet of 201 utility easements 200 feet of 161 utility easements proposed 8' water line and three fire hydrants. 1 1 u Denton Bible Church Addition January 22, 1991 Page 2 Reepe fully au t dt 1 Llo d Harrell Prepare s t City Manager Owen YOe Urban planner, ASLA 4 i t a Appro p k ob in$# ICP E ecutive Director I Planning and Development 1 1'1220 I If C ~ ~t j i t I i i I j 1 r V /I ■ ATTACHMENT 1 i Up ' R E Denton Bible Churchi Preliminary replat r' 1 ' INS ~ r n -sue r r ' ~ / I , •f► i / ~ , r + NOW q ADM h ~MOC Al 1IlI I i I Ill 'em '0,!' 1 Iii / 1 G~ ..ate . ILaKr =U=~- ~~"s1 III l ~ l : f ~ ~ ~ ' ~ e : • w n r : t ~ ~ 71 Belle to IL K 4 b r r.., adRjl~n711 r • • r • ~f'f •I.1 I ; • vn~ f.nn m6f r~ 1 ~ ' T I!I e• I I g 1 I J M .yam . 11 w ^d / f rI~M 1~(n now 9 w }4 ' { f I I f ~ t A, 1[r iAIW=.~ (I f 1 P&Z minutes ATTACHMENT 3 January 9, 1991 ~r111;11~ it Page 2 I Motion was made by Mr. Kamman and seconded by Ms. Morgan to recommend approval of the preliminary and final replats of Bellaire Heights, Phase V. in. consider a final plat of Lot 1, Block 1 of the Greenwich Village Townhome Addition. Staff Reports Mr. Yost reported that the tract is .45 acres located on Mingo Road approximately 300 feet northeast of Ruddell Street. The applicant will not utilize the 8" sewer line which partially fronts his property. Instead, he proposes to serve the new structure via an existing 4" line, which has been judged to be adequate by the Water/Wastewater Department. The Development Review Committee recommends approval. Mr. Appleton moved to approve the final plat of Lot I. Block 1 of the Greenwich Village Townhome Addition. Motion was seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht and unanimously carried (6-0). IV. Consider a general development plan of 18.468 acres of land on University Drive, east of its intersection with Shawnee and north of Mohican, owned by the Denton Bible Church. Staff Reporti Mr. Yost reported that the tract is 16.468 acres located along University Drive. city services and facilities, including water, gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and solid waste, are available or, planned for, to the proposed structures. The Development Review Committee recommends approval. Ms. Broc% asked the status of thr proposed extension of Nottingham. Mr. Yost answered that construction will begin this year but will not be complete until 1992, The layout is definite. It was moved by Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Mr. Engslbrecht, and unanimously carried (6-A) to approve the general development plan for 18.469 acres owned by tLe Denton Bible Church. V. Conalder the preliminary replat of the current. Denton Bible Church Addition, plus additional unplatted lend, totalling 94578 acres located on University Drive north of Mohican. 3-1 i M 1 L~ P&Z Minutes January 9, 1991 Page 3 ' Staff Report: Mr. Yost stated that the tract is 9.578 acres located on the south side of University Drive at its intersection with the proposed 1i~ttingham Road. It is a long lot. Two/thirds of it was previously unplatted. An 811 water line is proposed along with 3 fire hydrants. The Development Review Committee recommends approval. Ms. Brock asked about sidewalks. l C.; Mr. Yost replied that a portion of Lot 1 was not required in the replat. A sidewalk will be along the edge of Nottingham and part of University. Motion was made by Ms. Morgan, seconk'ad by Mr. Glasscock, and unanimously carried (6-0) to recoiunend approval of the L preliminary replat of the Denton Bible Church Addition, VI. Hold a public hearing and consider a planned development detailed plan and preliminary plat of an 11,19 acre tract in PD-16 and PD-19 for a shopping center, fire station, and ' public library on property located at the southwest corner of Teasley Lane and Lillian Miller. Staff Reports Ms. Feshari stated that the detailed plan is for all of PD-16 and part of PA-19. Fifty feet of right-cf- way from centerline and aidewalks will be required on f Teasley Lane and Lillian Miller. Water is adequate for the site and an 811 sanitary sewer line will need to be extended across the frontage, On December 13, 1988 the city Council passed and approved an ordinance designating a 9,2 acre tract in PD-16 for general retail land use. This ordinance corrected two 1973 ordinances that were done for PD-16. On August 190 19860 the City Council passed Ordinance 86-164 which approved a revised concept plan for PD-19. The PO reflects a mixed use development, The triangularly shaped tract is shown as part of the right-of-way at the intersection of Teasley and Lillian Miller Parkway and contains approximately two acres of land. Recently, the City has been working with NCNB Texas National Bank to exchange the triangularly shaped tract of right-of-way, which has been abandoned by the State, for a tract located on the western side of PD-16 for the purpose of establishing a fire station as well as a public library, The property is located in a low intensity area, The majority of this site has already been zoned for general retail type usesl therefore, the intensity calculations for this tract have already been established for commercial/retail usage, Ms, Feshari showed the commission slides of the site, She said that the GTE telephona lines will be relocated underground 3-2 t DATE: 01/22/91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council PROM: Lloyd V. Marrelle City Manager SUBJECT: PRELIMINRRY PLAT OF THE R,N,w, ADDITION, LOTS A, Be AND Cr BLOCK 1 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval at its 1 January 9, 1991 meeting (6-01, SUMMARY:: This is an 11.19 acre tract located at the southwest corner of Teasley Lane and Lillian Miller Parkway. BACKGROUND: The property is coned planned development (PD 16 and PD 19)e and retail development (s Anticipated, along with A City of Denton fire station and community facility. As detailed in the coning request previously reviewed, land in Lot C is being transferred to the private developer (NCNB Texas bank) in exchange for Lot A being transferred to the City of Denton, The private developer will preserve as much of the existing vegetation As possible, supplementing street trees as nooded, City services and facilitiue including water, game sanitary sever, telephone, electrical, and solid wasto, are available, Somo will have to be relocated to accommodate the site design. The plat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Dent,,n subdivision and Land Development Requlations, FROORAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUVS AFFECTED: In the persuant land exchange, the City of Denton will receive 2@05 acres of land, in exchange for a 1,0 acro lot, fISCA~L IMpACTt ! Lot A to the site for a proposed fire station and community facility, which the city will have to construct and maintain, City Council Report January 22, 1991 Page 2 FISCAL 114PACT: (Continued) Public improvements include: approximately 11160 feet of sidewalks approximately 1,100 feet of 20 fte utility easement and an 60 sanitary sewer linej two 250 feet drainage easements plus the associated curb inlets and pipese Respectfully submitted: Prepared byi Lloyd Ve Harrell i City Manager L- r Owen Yost p Urban Plan A&N f ' obbins, A1CP Direct r Planning and bevelopment ]215a I" { I 1 f I i I ' J I 1 I , i 1 J t M rr ATTACHMENT 1 f 1 i 9 1 1 1 I I ~l l1 J111 SITE 1 s I~ 1 u~r I ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TRACT i _S PO 16 ZONING 1"P41 A*4 004, I Tom 4 ♦ 1 ~ I `L+•r.. ' - Poly h i ii- Merl R.Isil W Ulkr hr,rNJ uu, hr ~ 1 aaar I Arr•.n1 0 0 ~y F f I1 F [I~~ ~ ~ 0 1 I - ic~ 0-4 ~ t f~J' f ~+I I 1 I f ( ~i¢RA11Y lefrµtur4 rua" N a lr r. ■u 1 n„ lwNt LN, ■ - Np In,~~wl Ile+f N) 1 1❑ Tl1101 NINY t'0 1 R♦ 1 ,r ~N I tl Mrs r 61 likes Vill vaurmm- I ~`J 11111AN MIl1# RAIItIMAY ei pv w,a, 1 V PC 19 ZONING I i r}~r+ - ~rvT- I1) 1 /1 N J1nI 1 ATTACHMENT 3 P&Z Minutes January 9, 1991 ~ Page 7 Ms. Brock moved to label the building a publicly owned community facility with perhaps some definitions added. Mr. Robbins said that other uses were not advertised. -Mr. Morris said that the important question is whether r people had opportunity to know whether the building might be a recreation center or other use besides a library. Mr. Engelbrecht asked if a recreation center could be c'. defined as a personal service as listed in the permitted uses for the zoning. i ; M r. Morris replied that the definitions are to define uses and werenhot incl a a in theAdding publicuses notice,iu It does not iappeathey that a recreation center was advertised. Mr. Robbins said that from reading the notice, he does not believe that people would have known other than a library was proposed, There is the same problem if the building is labeled "W'. The issue is not the owner. He suggested approvatorthe site plan with the library and then amending Ms. Brock withdrew her motion. Mr. Appleton asked who interprets the definitions of permitted uses. Ms. Feshari said that City staff normally does so. If there are questions, the matter would be brought to the Commission for classification of the use. Mr. Appleton moved to recommend approval of 2-90-016 as recommended by staff. seconded by Mr. Olasscook and unanimously carried (6-0). Staff report for plat of site] Mr, Yost stated that the plat is for the same piece of land as the toning case. The Development Review Committde recommends approval. It was moved by Ma. Morgan, seconded by Mr. Appleton, and unanimously carried (6-0) to recommend approval - of the preliminary plat of the R.N,W, Addition, Block 1, Lots A, B# and C. i 3-7 t r 1}s. arowxx } • 2651L-1/3689 NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPE14DITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DA'rE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equip- ment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures ul state law and City ordinances; and WHFAF.AS,' the City Manager or a designated employee has C reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and i WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted herein; NOW, THEREFORE, ' THE COUNCIL OF 711E CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the numbered items in the following numbered bids or materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid Proposals" on file in the Office 'of the City' a'Purchaxiirb Agent filed according to the bid number assigned thereto$ nru hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids for such items: j BID ITEM MOUNT I NCMBER N0. VENDOR i 1141 _ 1.5 - BILL UTTF.n FORD, INC, 179,101.15 1191 314 XM IU.EMENT rOND 1391778.50 ~ 1193 _ 1,2 SUMMIT 1I8ITE GMC TRUCKS INC. X571932017 _ t193 - TTj WRTH TRUCK SUPPLY $~.7RA.6o Ilae , I BILL UTIE FOM IRC, ,$3!1967.00 ~JIBr 2 ALTEC, IND. _ $39073,00 1198 - LL _ g~rrnn arrvvt.r _ 314,608.00 ji 11" _ w..nrentl rin Ln T nrnDKEY 160.800.00 1 I i ~ y ■ SECTION II. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbers tems of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, bid Proposals, and related documents. i SECTION Ill. That should the City and persons submitting, approve an accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a formal written agreement as, a result of 010 acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bids the City Managor or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein approved and accepted. SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbred-Itatis of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the a proved bids or pursuant to a writton contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective imme ate y upon its passage and approval, PASSED AND APPRUVED this day of r ,f991. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST- i JENNIFER WALTER9, FURUM APPROVED AS TO LEGAL PORMt I~ DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY 1 BY- PAGE TWO w 4 ~ ranw~ ` t DATEsJanuary 22,1991 IIiTY_IIgliHli3L_flEPQHT ~ TOi Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMI Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTS BID 11191-FLEET VEHICLES fl&IIIIk1a&HQdTiQN~ Council approve award of bid to the low bidders meeting specifications as followas ~i Bill Utter Ford, Inc, amount of 879,707.75 for ; (it) 1 each Mini-Van at 8121622.75 each, " (05) 5 each 1 Ton Cab/Chassis at 813,417,00 each 1 Karl Klement Ford in the amount of 839,778.50 for (13) 3 each 1/2 Ton Pickup at 89,460.23 each (88099,41 base + 8660,82 for A/C) (14) 1 each 3/4 Ton Cab/Chassis at 811,397.81 each and reject bid received on Item 11, I ,gUNHABYs Only one bid was received on item 01 and it was greater than the budgeted amount, Vendor quoted a stock vehicle which included many optional items not required in the specification, The following vehicles are scheduled Motorpool replacements, The items they are replacing are no longer economical to maintain, _ITSM fl6P6dsi~~ 12 Municipal Lob 082 Plymouth 13 Electric Metering (1) each 083 Dodge Residential Solid Waste (1) each 183 Dodge 14 Electric Distribution 184 Dodge 15 Electric Distribution (1) each 184 Dodge Water & Sever Field Svo, (4) each (2)084 8 MISS Dodges ' One 1/2 ton pickup (Item 13) is a fleet addition for Electric Metering as approved during the budget process, fldIINIIflIIkxti Tabulation sheet. PSQIIBdaS~__IIBPAHTISBNT__QE__IIB1a3tEfl__dFFSf~TEII~ Motorpool and Departments referenced in summary, Page 2of2 City Council Report 3anuary 22, 1991 etcr~CTf motorpool and 1991 Budgeted Funds. i ly 04Dmitteds r Harrell 1 Vidoze ity manager tl C I Prepared byt Melanie Hardsn 11t1+11 Buyer Approved NareI Tom B. Shaw, C.P.M. Titles Purchasing Agent MH/jh 100,000 I I, { ; 1 k i i s } HID i 1191 1 I j 1 HID NAME FLEET VEHICLES 1 BILL UTTER 1 KARL KLEMENT I I FORD I FORD OPEN DATE JANUARY 8, 1991 I I 1 1 ACCOUNT / I I I 1---------------I---------------I 6 1 T I QTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I - I-----1---------------------------- ----------------I---------------1 1 1 1 1 q DOOR SEDAN I N/B I 115,410.75 I 2 I 1 I MINI VAN I $120622.75 1 $12j799,96 I 1 I I I , 3 1 2 1/2 TON PICKUP 1 19,242.75 I 18,799.41 1 AIR CONDITIONING ADD I 1665.00 1 1660.82 I Gfw 4 1 1 1 3/4 TON CAB CHASSIS I 1111414.00 j 111,397.81 I 1 I I 1 R ~ 5 I 5( 1 TON CAB CHASSIS 1 113,417.00 ; 113,430.97 1 AIR CONDITIONER ADD ; 1685.00 ' 1660.82 1 1 I DELIVERY i 45 DAYS i 45.90 DAYS I I I NO RESPONSESi I I #ALT /4 , I I I DAVE KRAUSE DODOS I I 1110696.46 I I I DENTON COUNTY MOTORS I I a I I NORTH TEXAS AUTOPLEX ~ I I I I 1 I I I ~ '1. 1! .N,nER, 1 4 DATE:January 22019r1 raTZ_Y0aNgIL-ER.011 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council i FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTS BID •1193-TRUCKS 6 DUMP BODIES flE44Mt4EflFATIQflt Council approve award of bid to the low bidderst Summit White GHC Trucks Inc; Total of $57,932.17 for: 01 (1 each) 20,200 OVW Cab/Chassis at $180087.45 each. #2 (2 each) 28,000 GVW Cab/Chassis at $19,922.36 each. Ft. Worth Truck Supply; Total of $8,780.00 for: ;3 (2 each) 6-7 cy Dump Body $4,390.00 each. AMIARX: This bid is for the purchase of two cab/chassis ! trucks with dump bodies for Water 6 Sewer Field Services and one 1 1/2 ton cab/chassis for Water Reclamation. These are motor pool replacement items for two (2) 1984 Ford dump trucks and one (1) 1984 1 ton Dodge. gAYAg$4Ygp: Tabulation sheet. Pfl44flAlSfl~_pSPAflTNEtIT__48-Sa94YP,~__APFE~TEp~ Water and Sewer Field Services, Water Reclamation, Motor pool. Motor pool funds and 1991 Budgeted Funds fo WWaterrYandPSewerFieldServicesandWater Reclamation. for 1 Reapeo fully sub itted: _ L yd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: Namet Melanie Harden Title: Buyer Aprtiroved = Name: Tod D. Shaw, C.P.H. Title: Purchasing Agent , MH/jh 101.DOC t tl It F I BID r 1193 I I ! ! I I 1 E I ' ' BID we 7711089 R mw Bmim I ou ma I R. NoRt11 ! Lwm nm 1 1M11At417 IF0N1ADi TiU]I I MM FM I M MW I KUL REW I S1r1u71rM t 1 mo I ]HICK SM I B7JMW I alr'L. I B"W. 00. 1 7MM mm I a t I= ! oc I I I I I I ! I ! I I MEN DAIS imam 8, 1991 I I I I I I E I I I E 1 I I I I I I I I Aooctw r i I I I I I I I t I 1 t 1 I I I I I I I, ; C-1 r 1014 I 7~1 t®alasicr I TEN= I YQrooB I YEN" I voooa ! vF7rooB I vooon I v®ooB I Ysanart 1 t+aooH r.l__I I 11L._t t L- IL_...-1. I 1 I 1 1 1 1 20,200 m I $19,295.50 1 N/9 I H/8 I 4$20,998.00 1 K/B I $19,345.00 1 $18,597.00 1 il/b I $18,087.45 I 1 I I 1+600 I 1 1 ant, 4600 I I MOO I 006tW I 1 CEFD4' I 2 1 2 1 28,000 cW t 121,112.70 1 N/B I N/B I '$x,765.00 I Ka I $20,985.00 1 $19,975.00 1 N/B I $19,922.361 I I t r 700 1 I I I I F 600 I wrH042 I I ocr M 1 E I 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 6-7 YD Vff Bart I $40494.00 1 $4,390.00 1 16,075.00 1 w8 I 64"*.Oo I $6,000.00 1 45,075.00 1 we ! wo t I I F o11[Aat I FWAa1 1 HM 1 I Frnt;~m I Ili. I I 1 1 UF1.Im i In tx7s 1 i 60 WS i 90-120 WS i 45 DAYS i 45-0 DATE i I I 906,20 D"S : I I I 1 I 1 DDM i 1 2a3 1 j 1 I I I 1 i ML OR mad 1 I 1 I j 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 ! 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1 E I I I 1 1 I 1 ! ~ 1' j 1 1 I I I I I ! I I I II 1 4 V!FjjF s DATEsJanuary 22,1991 43IY_~4flH~YL_flFPQflT 1~ TOs Mayor and Members of the City Council 1 FROMI Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTS BID 01194-DIGGER DERRICK & TRUCK jZ, Qhg$flpbjjQgs Council approve award of bid to the low bidders meeting specifications: : Item 01 Truck Cab/Chassis to Bill Utter Ford inc. for a { total $35,987.00. Item I2 Derrick to Altec Ind. for a total of $399873.00. 'I 22MBinji This bid is for the replacement of a 1981 ` International linebody digger derrick and truck for Electric Distribution. It is a scheduled motor pool replacement item. fl~PgQgQggp; Tabulation sheet. , r P$QQfl,~tlBi___pEPeflT2lflflT___Q9---QBQflP&___AEF ULD1 Electric Distribution and Motor Pool. gjQQjL__I~PdgxI Electric Distribution and Motor Pool Replacement Budgeted Funds. Respectfullyssuubbmitteds to d V. Harrell City Manager i Prepared bys pame.t Me ante H~ and n` E Titles Buyer Approved: amen TOM D. Shaw, C.P.M. Titles Purchasing Agent MH/jh 1 102.DOC { r C.w f z I BID i 1194 r r I I I I I f I r I 1 E 1 I I 1 E BID WE Dja(M DMCK a TEIx7C j 30MM I Ee17io FOIO ! olc Wlp. I SUL MW I 80JOOM I liN18W ]NIL 1 ONEM u. I ALTIE DD. I RWH ILL aovaam IRM mm ' 00. i Fm i DIM MCx9 ! i BmT 0081. MN WE JdH m 8, t99t I I I I I E I I I i XMIM i I I I f f I I I I I I t E l I I 1 i I arx I nim tr~cn>PTtON I vmm I va" I v"m I vmm I vwm I Ymm I vaoas I VINOR I MOM 1 1 r i ^'-i i i r I r ! i I I( Tm cmUv I 0,623.00 1 0,789.00 I $38,855.00 1 $35,987.00 1 $39,819.00 E $39,979.00 1 137,855.00 1 $39,813.00 1 06,605.00 I I I CW ! Fm I am I I Da. I am.. 1 rolo I ow I Em I 1 0cr" I if 900 1 cc7t064 I FT 900 1 4900 6x4 I 4900 6x4 I ET 900 I M7HA I FT 900 I I I I I I I I I I 1 2I 1 1 tEMUCE I I $76,811.00 1 $71,648.00 1 1 I 1 $76,811.001 168,847.OOI $71,829.00 I I I I 7u-wf I TMM I I ! I Tom I ALTI C I STAR. I I I I 4700 1 V 300 1 I I I 4700 I 01000 r I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I Iu.T. $37493.00 1 I I I I I I r I I I ac + ~ I I r r I I I I ! r I c71o6a I I r f I I I I I I I I 1 Dal= I IV WS I 150 OATS 1150.,60 WS I 75 airs 16x,20 WS 190-120 rATS I 150 M r 160 00x9 I 00 DM I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I j I I I I I ! f I I I I I I I I I I I I E 1 I I I I f 1 I I I 1 I I I I I f f I I ! I f I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I i r t I I I I I I I I ! f I t f I I r I I I I I t t I I I I I I I f l 11 I ` '1 } WWNI+W DATE:January 22,1991 43T Y_ 4411 ~14I L_P PEQ PT E ` 1 1 i TOs Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTS BID 11198 HIGH PRESSURE HOSE AND PEEL ASSEMBLY PAMMAHATAQNI We recommend this bid be awarded to the only CI bidder bidding all items, Naylor Supply in the amount of $14,608.00 not including the optional tool box. i 3.QMHAPY1 This bid is for the purchase of a portable high pressure hose and reel assembly. The unit 15 designed to allow the water and Sewer Field Service department access to areas otherwise unacceptable with existing sewer flushing trucks. The unit is small, can be maneuvered in confined spaces and will fit through gates eto. The bid includes the reel assembly, 20 hp gasoline engine, 2000 pal pump, 600 of 1 hose and transportation trailer. AA4%22QYli4: Tabulation sheet. PPQQPAbP~_BEPAPTt~EHT_Q~_QPQltPP_A££EQTEp: Water/Sewer Field Services. I LUftAL-jtlEA.4Ts This is a 1990-91 budget expenditure. Funds I~ are available in account 0620-080-0471-9104 machinery and i equipment. i 4e3 ully submitted Y. Harrell City Manager Approved bys Names Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Titles Purchasing Agent TS/jh 104.DOC i r i 44 wwwal J 'r BID f 1198 ! I I I ! I I I 1 1 BID NAME HIGH PRESSURE HOSE ! NAYLOR SUPPLY I INDUSTRIAL I UNDERGROUND I ASSEMBLY I CO. (DISPOSAL SUPPLYI INC. I I I I I { ~ OPEN DATE JANUARY 8o 1991 1 I I 1 ACCOUNT f I ( I I 1 I I I ! f 1 QTY I ITEM DESCR'PTION I VENDOR ! VENDOR I VENDOR ! J `I ! I I I ! 1 I I ! I 1 1 I HP HOSE REEL ASSEMBLY I $119530-000 1 NIB I NIB I I I 1 1 ! c I I TRAILER I 11,218.000 1 $1,208.000 I NIB ! 1 I I ! I I 1 I HOSE 1 $1,080.000 1 $1,344.000 1 NIB I I I I I 1 I I 1 TOOL BOX (OPT.) I =508.000 I $275.000 1 NIB I I I I I 1 1 I I FREIGHT I $780.000 ( I I I I I I ADD 1 I p I I I $50.000 1 I 1 I I 1 STEEL TREAD I I 1 I 1 I I ON TAAILEP ( I I I I I 1 I r~ I I I I 1 I j J i 1 DATE:January 22,1991 1 S~ITI_S~lt23S IL_HTPQBT i TOs Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager j SUBJECT; BID 01204-69 KY CIRCUIT BREAKERS I $E~4tltlEHpATIQHs Council approve award of bid to the low bidder meeting specifications, Siemens c/o Len T. Deloney Co., in the amount of $600800.00. 2gjjtlA$y: This bid is for the purchase of two (2) 69 Kv Circuit Breakers at a unit price of $30,400.00. These will be for the upgrade of Kings Row Substation. @A~~gBQL$ps Tabulation sheet. PB44BAM~._pPPAflTr.E1(T_Qg_9BQ1tP~_AFEE~TEps Electric Metering. 1 Fj2SAL_itlPAgj s BUDGETED funds are available in account 0612-080-AB90-F000-9217. Respeo ully submitted; JI C- L1 yd Y. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: -N- -6.P i Nama: M Janie Harden Titles Buyer Approved; Names Tom D. Shaw, C'.P.M. Titles Purchasing Agent TS/jh 106.DOC I 1 i1 1{} l r.r BID # 1204 I ( I I} i I I 1 BID NAME 69 KV CIRCUIT BREAKERS 1PRIESTER SUPPLYIC/O LEN DELONEYI ASEA BROWN t I I SEIMENS I BOVERI 1 I I 1 OPEN DATE JANUARY 10, 1991 ABB I I I 1 ACCOUNT ! I t I 1 .I ! I 1 1 I QTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 ~I I I I I. I t I I I 1 I 2 1 69 KV CIRCUIT BREAKER 1 $309764.000 1 $309400.00 I !30,680.00 I I I I I I f 2 1 I MANUFACTURER I COOPER I SIEMENS t ABB POWER I f I I 1 I I I DELIVERY i 20 WEEKS t 20 WEEKS 1 175 DAYS I I I I I I t f I t I I I I TOTAL 1 =61,528.000 1 $60,800.00 I $61,360.00 I f f f I I t i I I NO BID f I 1 t I I CUMMINS SUPPLY I 1 I I I I NELSON ELECTRIC I I 1 I I I ODOR a CO. I t I f 1 I TEMPLE I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I { ' I I t I 1 R 1 i o r m 2651L-5/3689 i NO. j AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR PURCHASES OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WHICH ARE AVAILABLE FROM ONLY ONE SOURCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 252.022 of the Local Government Code provides i G6 that procurement of items that are only available from one source, including,: items that are only available from one source because j of patents, copyrights, secret processes or natural monopolies; films, manuscripts or books; electricity, gas, water and other utility purchases; captive replacement parts or components for equipment; and library materials for a public library that are available only frorn the persons holding exclusive distribution rights to the materials; need not be submitted to competitive bids; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to procure one or more of the items mentioned in the above paragraph, NOW, THEREFORE, r THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the following purchases of materials, uyrr' went or supplies, as described in the "Purchase Orders" atL;i-o. hereto, are hereby approved: PURCHASE ORrwR NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT 11708 ADVANCen .ANT M, ar STEHc _$11078A_nn U 7D5 wnrnQ01A -413"m 00 SECTION I1. That the acceptance and approval of the above items shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the quotation for such items until such person shall comply with all requirements specified by the Purchasing Department. SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any contracts relating to the items specified in Section I and the expenditure of funds pursuant to said contracts is hereby authorized. SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective imme ati eIy `upon its passage and approval. 4 PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1'991 i BOB CASTLEBERRY* MAYOR ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY, II i I ltlnYM~ 1 1 DATE:January 22,1991 i QITY_QQlib~IL_FLPQST T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council 1 FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCUSE ORDER #11704 ADVANCED CONTROL SYSTEMS 1' HPSc4!!!lEllp6TI42i: We recommend this single source purchase order number 11704 to Advanced Control System in the amount of $11,784.00 be approved and the requested material be ordered. $Q!))SA$Y: This single source purchase order is for the purchase of a communication package consisting of two (RTU13) remote terminal units for installation at the Lewisville'Ray Roberts Hydroelectric projects, The RTU's will allcs monitoring and controlling of the two hydroelectric units from the Municipal Power Plant on Spencer Road. The SCADA system currently owned and operated by the City of Denton is manufactured by Advanced Control System and the protocol (software) is protected by patent and copyright. It's not available from any other source., This acquisition r la exempt from the bidding process. Public utility board recommends approval. @AS fLZQDXPi Purchase order 011704, Advanced Controls System Quote, minutes from Public Utility Board meeting 12-19-90. P3QfiHdtl,S~_QBPdHTtl&NT~B-4B43iPS_dFE84T&Q: Electric Production and Communications Divisions in the installation and operation of the SCADA system. UML_MAU : This item is a revenue bond expenditure from account numbers Ray Roberts 612-080-RB90-JR06-9235-1X11 Lewisville 612-080-RB90-JR04-9235-1X07 Rekdi.- City 1 Manager Approved by: Lhy%Q _ Names Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Titles Purchasing Agent TS/Sh 108.DOC Il F >`t CONFIRMING ORDER I I (IF MARKED) U PURCHASE OROER NO: DO NOT DUPLICATE This number must appear on a1 PC 11704 Invdoee, dtltvery eapl, pcases, s an aM Ctns, hoes, packing ety bins. Req No: E d No: Date: 01 11 91 Page No 01 NDOR PUACNASiNG 01VIS/ON 1901.0 TEXAS StAEf r / DEN rON, rf)(AS 7620r ME/ ACV.11%C2D CCNTSCL SYSTE;d arFr~eTFroo o1FwME?'AOarF1267.0012 FAXatF1382-4692 ; DRESS P.C. ECX 47424 g ATLAh? A► GA ,90:62 DELIVERY C_NTRAL RECEIVING S13 ADDRESS UTILITY DEPARTMENT 90) U TEXAS ST OENTONi TX 76201 VENDOR NO. DELIVERY OUOTED AilV49000 01 31 91 FOB DESTINATION TERMS Ol .5GG EA ENDGR CAT. ' CITY a 2052d N / A MFG NAME 19784.000 REPOTS TERMINAL UNIT MPR-7150 (50x CF TOTAL PRICE) 6189..0 OA RAY RCOERTS hYDROELECTRIC PADJECT TO TIE TO DENTCNaS SC DA Y3TE4. EQUIPPED AS FOLLOWS! 32-STATUS IhPUT51 16 ANALOG NPUTS (c?-1MA) G 16 ANALOG INPUTS (4-20MA). 4 CGNTACL PCINTS. 4 MC .NTAR LATCHING. 10 AMP-120 VAC. EN 125VOC PutfER SUPPLY. NEMA 4 VAL MGUNT CLOSUiE 40tiH X 34 M X 12" 03 •300 EA VEN,7CR CAT. i N / A MFG NAME CITY a 20929 117840030 518S:.') AEAOTE ONLY ORDERING OPRICE) (1) ITEM. COST TO BE SPLIT b0/60 Et2jwEEN 790 (2) ACCGUNTS. 01 PAGE TOTAL ! 11 781.0 612 080 Re90 SS99 5225 GRANO TOTAL I ili7a110 02 612 080 F890 SS99 S235 S*8S2a00 VENDOR INSTRUCT1)N5: 3. Terms - Net 30 N wu a - I Send orb4W kh+ s w.th dut*ate Copy. 6 Shop V kmtn bons F alb - ActounU Payable 5 No h:eral ar state a ks 1 " r am wh. u~ near 110 E WKinney St. In er to C•-l- TX 75*0, a baled. ~ C.rt aGinQ Div'sOn I r~ A 1 TRANSMITTAL SHEET ADVANCED CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC, P.O. BOX 47824 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30362 TELEPHONE: (404) 451-4586 FAX: (404) 448-0957 f OATS: TO: .COMPANY: Cal FAX N:g~~. FROM 3,J f --..K. ° TOTAL NUMBER OF PACES: (INCLUDING COVER SHEET) I f ul~ w C S cf fit~ ~u Q 0 C) cur) I s I I 1 Y r ~ 1 ADVANCED CONTROL SYSTEMS' PO BOX 478@4 ATLANTA. GA 30362 TEL 404.431.4666 QUOTATION TO Mr. InA harry Please include priority ratings, DENTON H1UNICIPA Tx TTTLG`_ contract numbers, and desired 9oi-A Texas street delivery on your order. Prices quoted herein apply to specified Denton Texas 76 0l quantities only and are not in excess of legal maximums. This quotation is subject to accep- tance within 60 days from date f, YOUR shown unless otherwise indicated. REFERENCE_ REQUEST POR UOTATION U N 1 a n- 0) ITE N 1 1 MPR-7050 Remote Terminal Unit $ 50892 equipped as follows: $ 5,892 32 - Status Inputs 16 - Analog Inputs, 0-1ma 16 - Analog inputs, 4-20ma 4 - Control Points, 4 Momentary, 2 Latching, 10 AMP-120VAC 125VDC Power Supply ' NEMA 4 Wallmount Enclosure 4011H x 3211W x 12111D 0 ~19N; ' 4er for 4.-Control P Hts, _ _ 3` Momentary, 2- Latch ng„ 16 AMP- 1.25VDC j 1 I L ~ 60 - 90 DAYS ARO ADVANCED CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC. P.O. BOX 47824 By 1 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30362 (404) 451-4586 TITLE AccountaManaaer . 'r EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES December 19, 1990 ; 11. CONSIDER PURCHASE OF TWO SUPERVISORY CONTROL AND DATA ACQUISITION (SCADA) REMOTE TERMINAL UNITS (RTU'S) FOR LAKE LEWISVILLE AND LAKE RAY ROBERTS HYDRO UNITS. I Tullos explained this complements the equipment in Item 10 and will allow communications bark to the Spencer Road power plant. Cost is $ 5,892/ea. Laney made a motion to purchase. Second by Ridens. All ayes, no nays, motion carried. I I L ! I II ~ ~ s ! r ,f { 14 j f k DATEiJanuary 22,1991 4TTY_~4~LN~TL_flEP4HT ' TOs Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTS PURCHASE ORDER 111705 MOTOROLA HEt4dtlE846TIQ~l~ We recommend the purchase order 111705 to Motorola in the amount of =13,275.00 be approved and the requested material be ordered. i fl.QMMAHYs This purchase order is for the single source purchase of Motorola Darcom radios to be used In conjunction with the SCADA Communication System between the Lewisville/Ray Roberts Hydroelectric projects and the Municipal Power Plant. These radios must be compatible with existing communication equipment. They are only available from Motorola and are protected by patents and software copyrights. As single source high tech material they are exempt from he bid process. Public Utility Board recommend approval. 1"1211,QUfiDs Purchase Order.111703, Motorola Quotes. , PB9IlflAMS~__LSPdBTME~IT__4B__9H9YES__dFFEIlTHpI Communication Division of Electric Utility Department. i LIUAL-IMBA91i This item is a revenue bond expenditure account numbers Ray Roberts 612-080-8890-JR06-9235-10 1 Lewisville 612-080-RD90-JL04-9235-1kO7 Respeo ally submitteds L1o d Harrell City Manager Approved by: Namei Tom D. Sha , C.P.M. Titles Purchasing Agent TS/jh 105.DOC j F i 1 i !r i a r CONFIRMING ORDER (IF MARKED) U PURCHASE ORDER NO: r DO NOT DUPLICATE This number muss appear ass FC I 1 703 ~ krvokes, delivery s<bs, cases, Rim No: Bid No: ctns, boxes, packlrq albs and ails, Date: 01 is 51 Pape No, ' 01 1DOR PURCHAPNGD/V/S10N/901 a rEXASSTREEr/DENrON, rEXAS16200 dE! MCTOFOLA 8111383.7100 0,FWAfErR08l7/267.ON7 fAXB!>'1782.1592 CRESS 1201 3l1 SCH1UMRG00ILL.,i60196 DEWERY CENTRAL REC21VING •S 13 / ADDRESS UTILITY DEPARTMENT z ± 901 0 TEXAS ST 1 DNTONi TX 762201 1 VENDOR NO, DEWERY OUOTED MU 56003 01 31 $1 FOB TERMS DSTINATION O1 6v 00 cA VENDCR CAT. M N / A , CITY O 20313 MFG NAME 30275.OOJ ~ OAAC014 RADIO EQUIPMENT TO Be USzD IN CCNJUNCTIGN WITH 606,:76. „ °WISVILLE HYDiiGELECTr%IC PROJeCT. REMOTE TERMINAL UNIT TO COMMUNICATE WITH DENTON IS SCADA S TEM AT THE POWER PLANT. 02 .500 EA VENDCR CAT• 0 N / A CITY 0 29513 MFG NAME 3e275.0GQ e GOES WITH LINE I SZCCND ACCOUNT NUMBER 711AT NEEDS TO BE SO 60637., FOR THIS PAUJE:CT. r C1 612 08G RBDQ y' PAG3 TO??AL : 30273.6, 62 OEO 39C 9999 1225 60637650 GRAAD TOTAL ! 13627500 I _ 9995 5235 60637.50 °\71OOR INSTRUCTIONS: 3. Terms Net 30 u,, Send GrV4kty k@ with dupkcal0 copy, I n' ' ..0 wwr0a r 9 Q to - Accounts Payable 8.9hpp g In#Inrc7ions, F., 3. Destlnalkn Amaid ."41 GNrwod 804CA10 ,40 215 E. McKinney St. 6 In r dcts ba slala Si as :s f shall D~f D,,.,•n Tx 7p x1 I In crkes billed. Ve' Purchas+nQ Dwision i ` 1 a 9 M Addr"s Ropy to: V 0. 9011919049 MO'f10i~LA ouiu, tX re,711 caul 999i~oo QWWWrk*bN find ftchsonk s ho, 1.5-91 CITY of DENTON 901 Tom&% Street Denton, Taxes 76201 Referancei Darcom 9000 Ouoto Tx 920.76675 Rx 902.76973 Attached is the quotation for a Point To Multipoint Master Duplex I Station which is mountabla in a 19 ° rack. The basic unit includes j G:; the trailscelver, operator interface module, motoring nodule, 117Y or. power supply, and a 2.5 AH back-up battery. ITRM OTY 0119CRIPTION UNIT EXTENDED 1 1 F2643 FDMS. 0692.'50.00 s6,250a00 Sa I V344 Ext/CH/MON. 0600 0400 lb 1 V347 1;.5 kht 0400 0000 le 1 FRN7924 Hdset 30000 30800 id 1 Mk1075 7' Rack 370.00 375.00 2 100, TDN"02 LDF Coax 900.00 900400 2a 1 RRX40344 A/C SURGE 65.00 65.00 2b 1 R1tX4043A ANT ORS 63000 6!l.00 2c 1 TDF6553 909 AMT. 010075.00 !1,075.00 2d 1 D9D62040NMNM N-MALE CON -35.00 f TOTAL COST 499043.00 Sincerely M O T O R O L A ;Coulg nicati a s INC. ay Rp! Yx uttve Governments Markets Division 1301 E. ftonquln Ad., Schaumburg, IL 60146 r 6 1 M January 9, 1991 Mr. Don Byra City of Denton 901 Texas Street Denton, Texas 76201 ' Reference. Oarcom 9000 Quote/Addltlon of Remotes The F2684 Full Duplex Remote Station previously quoted to you 6/21/89 by Jim Mantos has been replaced by a new model; F2707 Full Duplex Remote Station 52,1 15.00 ea./$4,230,00 for 2 V344 External Channel Monitor $ 0100 V347 12,5 KN= Operatlon ~0.60 Total Cost for 2 Remote Stations 54,230.00 This quote 1s furnished in addition to the one Jim Mantos gave you dated 1/a/91. If I can be of any further assistance, please let me know-, Sincerely, I Pat Ballinger Account Executive 11 214-888-6932 i , I ~ J J 1 1 EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES December 19, 1990 v 10. CONSIDER PURCHASE OF MOTOROLA DARCOM (TM) EQUIPMENT FOR LAKE LEWIS- VILLE AND LAKE RAY ROBERTS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECTS. Tullos briefed the members on the communication link between , the two hydroelectric plants. This system will be compatible with our existing Motorola equipment and the cost is $16,028. Ridens made a motion to purchase. Second by 11 Laney. All ayes, no nays, motion carried. j 1 I 1 r ; } I 1 1 I 13 Of d7;'P,TPr-!# FC2-,'4Ci MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E.MeKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM DATIs: January 170 1992 '1'o: Lloyd V. Iinrrcll, city Manager FPCi1- John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance , SUOJECT: :05901000 CITY OF DENTON CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION The sale of ;590,000 in Certificates of Obligation will provide for the fa110~rin9: 0 8200,000 for new roofs on City Nall and the Central Fire Station. { 0 3k~0,000 for the purchase of two (2) residential refuse truche. 1`! 0 ;162,400 for twolve (12) police sedans. 0 840,ODO for a tractor/mower o .39,500 for a tire cutter. 'the City council has been briefed in earlier meetings about the roofing j prohlemn with City owned buildings, The City Hall roof was discussed in the b!:rlgct process and it was recommended to finance the new roof through the I, ir;uanco of Certificates of Obligation. TI',e police sed.a.nr, tractor/mower, tire cutter and a residential refuse truck have alrso hccn discussed in the budget, Funding for the debt repayment of the CerW icatcs of Obligation is provided in the budget. The City utilizes the sale and proceeds from Certificates of Obligation rather tt~r,n a private lease/purchase program because the interest rate the City receiver 0 generally lower than the private lease/purchase. If you rinrA m y additional information or have any further questioner please a~l'rirc. i i I rj fi107 Y °17 ~'~•01,11 WFW Mf:TR6 X34.2529 ( ik i ORDINANCE NO. 91 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION OF THE. CITY OF DENTON TEXAS THE STATE OF TEXAS ; COUNTY OF DENTON s CITY OF DENTON t WHEREAS, it is deemed necessary and advisable that Notice of Intention to Issue Certificates of obligation be given as hereinafter provided. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. That attached hereto is a form of "NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS", the form and substance of which are hereby adopted and approved. Section 2. That the City Secretary shall cause said NOTICE, in substantially the form attached hereto, to be published once a week for two consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, with the date of the first publication to be at least fifteen (15) days before the date r tentatively set for the passage of the Ordinance authorizing the issuance of such Certificates of Obligation. t i i f '4 t } S r 1 CERTIFICATE FOR ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE SEBTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION OF T1,FSIT1 OF DENTON. T~.m THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON CITY OF DENTON = We, the undersigned Officers of said City, hereby certify as follower 1. The City Council of said City convened in REGULAR MEETING ON THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 1991, at the Municipal Building (City Hall), and the roll was called of the duly constituted officers and members of said City council, to-wits Jennifer K. Walters, City Secretary Bob Castleberry, Mayor Bob Gorton John Trent Jane Hopkins Jim Alexander Randall Boyd Hugh Ayer and all of said persons were present, except the following absenteess ~ f , thus ing a quorum. Whereupon, among other bus nasal the following was transacted at said Meetings a written ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION OF THE CITY OF DENTON# TEXAS was duly introduced for the consideration of said City Council and duly read. It was then duly moved and seconded that Said Ordinance be passedi and, after due discussion, said motion, carrying with it the passage of said Ordinance, prevailed and carried by the following vote: AYES9 NOESt ABSTENTIONS: ful and correct OrdinanceTpassedtat the Meeti g de cribd pinotheh above aforesaid foregoing paragraph is attached to and follows this Certifi- cate; that said Ordinance has been duly recorded in said City i r f t W IJ,)ry Councilis minutes of Paragraph is said Meetings that Councils minutes true, full, and correct the above and said Ordinance of said excerpt from said eCitng 1 that the Meeting pertaining the y Ing P rsa end h are the persons named in passage of duly chosen, the above and foreg_ and that eachmof the °f said cit qualified, and acting o was dui officers y Counoil as indicated therein? In advancend sufficient) and members of said City of the time y notified officially and y Council Meeting, and that , Place, and Personally, ~ considered for said Ordinance Purpose °f the G•; Introduced aforesaid was open tot Passage at said Meeti~uld be and and purpose ote aid ublic, meeting public gi and that said Meeting Vernon"s Ann. ing was notice of the time as ' Place, Tex. Civ. St. Article1 6252-17? y required b 3. That e aforesaid orOf Bald dinanc approves, ththe Mayor Secretary of said city , and hereby Ci th has approved at the that the Mayor and have duly sign ed saidayOr and the City declare that their slip City secrete Ordinances and the signing of the att ched an his Certificate ehallyconst;Cute Hance for all purposes. and following copy of said Ordi- S2GNED AND SEALED as of the 22nd day Of January, 1991. C ty Secretary (SEAL) Mayor We' the undersigned, bean and t - - - - - - - he Bond Attorne 9 respective) certify that we ys of the City of v6lY the City Attorney attached and prepared and approved Denton, Texas, hereby aforesaid, following Ordinance as to legalit prior to its passage the C ty Attorney Bon Attorneys 4 low i ~ THE STATE OF' TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON CITY OF DENTON . NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION OF TH. PITY OF DENTON T Yaa THE CITY OF DENTON, in Denton County, Texas, hereby gives notice of its intention to issue CITY OF DENTON CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION, in accordance with the certificate of Obligation Act of 1971, .:s amended and codified, and other applicable laws, in the maximum principal amount of $590,000 for the / purpose of paying all or a portion of the City's contractual obligations to be incurred (1) pursuant to contracts for replacing the roofs on the Municipal Building (City Hall) and the Central Fire Station, and (2) pursuant to contracts for the purchase of the following equipment for municipal use; twelve police cars, two garbage trucks, one tractor mower, and one tire cutter (shredder); and also for the purpose of paying all or a portion of the City's contractual obligations for profes- sional services of engineering, attorneys, and financial advisors in connection with such replacements, purchases, and Certificates of Obligation. Tha City proposes to provide for the payment of such Certificates of Obligation from the levy and collection of ad valorem taxes in the City as law, and from certain revenues derived by the City rfromethey ownership and operation of the City's Utility System (consist- ing of the City's combined waterworks system, sanitary sewer system, and electric light and power system). The City Council of the City tentatively proposes to authorize the issuance of such Certificates of Obligation at a meeting commencing at 7;00 P.M. on the day of , 1991, in the City Council room at the Mun oipal Building (City Hall), Denton, Texas, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS By Jennifer K. Walters, City Secretary III 1 i 1 Y DATE: 01/22/91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Q TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: ZONING CASE 2-90-009 RECOMMENDATION: Council directed that an ordinance as summarized below be prepared for Council consideration. j SUMMARY: C+;' The ordinance 1) Adopts a detailed site plan showing building, parking lot layout, landscaping with 325 square feet more landscaping, walls, sidewalks, signs, parking lot lighting, and service locations. 2) Allows automobile parts and service, other retail, and office uses, 3) Establishea restrictions and standards for auto service uses. as Noise shall not exceed 68 decibels on residential property adjacent to the site, to be measured from the residential side of sound mitigating/screening wall, b. Out of building auto repair is prohibited, c, Engine and transmission removal is prohibited. d. Assembly or disassembly of auto body parts is prohibited. e, Auto body painting is prohibited. f. Muffler and seat cover repair or replacement is prohibited. +i+ 4. The screening wall must be built before the building permit for II the building may be issued. 5. Requires parking for various land uses to be according to Article 15 (Parking) of the Zoning Ordinance, e b, Provides for illuminated sign standards, I, BACKGROUND: : January 8, 1991: Council approved a city initiated detailed plan, added other restrictions, and directed staff to prepare an ordinance, accordingly. f 14 Ir + Z-90-009 Page 2 January 22, 1991 PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Realtors, future developers and users of the subject tract and its neighbors. This zoning case had acquired a symbolic significance which will probably have attitudinal impacts in addition to physical impacts within the limited environs of the site. r FISCAL IMPACTS j $500 to purchase a sound measuring device. Reapectfu11 ubmitted *epe Y4bbina to d HarrCit y Manager oP DPlanning and De velopment i 2522x }fI t j i r I I I i i i I ti 1 t ` aaaa~ Ipotf0 I ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CI1Y OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DETAILED PLAN FOR 1.727 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE I-35 SERVICE ROAD, ADJACENT TO WOLFE NURSERY; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Golden Triangle Joint Venture requested approval of a planned development district detailed plan for 1.727 acres located G: I on the I-35 service road, adjacent to Wolfe Nursery, for use as an automobile service center and auto parts sales] and WHEREAS, City of Denton filed its own petition, requesting that the automotive service center be approved with conditions and that other retail uses be granted for the property; and WHEREAS on November 26, 1991, after a public hearing, the Planning and zoning commission recommended to the City Council that the city's petition be approved; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That for the property shown as Lot 4a, Block A, Township II, Phase II, as recorded in cabinet H, page 204 of the plat records of Denton County, Texas, there is approved a planned development district detailed plan, attached to and incorporated into this ordinance as Exhibit A. The land described shall be constructed, used, and maintained in accordance with the approved plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. Permitted Uses. The following uses shall be the permitted uses for the property under the approved plan: Auto service center (accessory automobile repair) and auto parts sales (new) Professional and administrative offices Financial Institution Health/Exercise Club Retail Stores an,l shops, as follows: Appliance store Video sales and rental store Bakery or confectionery shop (retail) Beauty shop Book store Camera shop Candy/ice cream/yogurt shop Carpet store Card or stationary shop Clothing/shoe store Computer/software sales store + '1 1 l/l1 I~ 1 y aw ■ I I Convenience store Drug store Electronics store Fabric shop Florist/garden shop/plant nursery ie/home furnishings store Gift shop Hardware store Health food store Hobby, handicraft, and art supply store Jewelry store ' Laundry/dry cleaners Music store Office supply Optical store Pet store Printing/photocopy store Sporting goods store Tanning salon Travel agency 2. Auto Service Center and Parts Sales. For the auto service center and parts sales, the following conditions shall apply: (a) There shall be a maximum of nine automobile service bays. (b) The peak noise level from activities occurring on the property shall not exceed sixty-eight decibels on any of the residential property abutting the site. (c) No automobile repair work shall occur outside of the building. (d) No automobile engine or transmission removal, auto body assembly, disassembly, or painting, muffler installa- tion, or seat reupholstering shall be permitted. (e) No used merchandise shall be displayed or sold. i 3. Parking Requirements and Building Size. The approved detailed plan shows seventy-four parking spaces for the proposed automotive service and parts sales, if the property is used for something other than the proposed automotive service and parts sales use, the maximum square footage of the any building or buildings shall be limited to the maximum size permitte-1 for the seventy-four parking spaces shown on the detailed plan as determined by Article ~ 18 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code Ordinances. 4. Screening. The concrete wall to be constructed along the 1 residential properties to Piney Creek, as shown in the 1 PACE 2 , 14 i I; a ` r f I detailed plan, shall be completed before the issuance of any building permit for any building on the property. 5. Building F:rtmetrrs. All buildings shall be constructed within the periraet.er of the building outline shown in tha detailed plan. f I I SECTION 11. That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $2,000. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. SECTION III. If any section,, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this tgreement, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of compe- tent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this agreement, and the parties hereby declare they would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and this City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of thin ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within "an (10) days of the date of its passage. I I BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR J ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY , BYs APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMs DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCN, CITY ATTORNEY BY s ' W.N+ 1 w PAGE 3 c y~. : rpcriwa EXHIBIT A ' DETAILED PLAN CONSISTING OF: 1. Site Plan (1 foldout page) 2. Development standards (4 pages) 3. Sign Lighting standards (3 pages) 4. Location of Screening Wall.(1 pegs) l f 1 i i i t i i PAGE 4 1! , i w 1 1 1 k d K#w:sroy DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DETAILED PLAN 1. Statement of Intent of Owner: N/A i i 2. Statement Indicating Relation to Denton Plan: Low intensity area dis ro ortionate share allocation made by Ordinance 169-3S an¢ h~ e~rein requested. Detailed Plan complies with i Entranceway Policies of the Denton Development Plan i 3. Total Number of Acres in-Proposed District: 1.727 acres 4. Land Uses and Total Nvsber of Acres in Each Parcel or Tsact: ' Total Proposed Acreage a. Single Family Detached N/A _J b. Single Family Attached (townhomes, etc.) N/A c. Attached Patio/Garden/Zero Lot Line N/A d. Duplex N/A t e. Multi-Family N/A { E. Office 'See Attachment 1 S. Neighborhood Service N/A h. General Retail ~See Attachment 1 1. Comsercial N/A J. Light Industrial N/A k. Heavy Industrial N/A 1. Other (specify) 24$Sx/13 i 5 r Development Standards Page 2 S. Off-site information - adjacent or surrounding land uses, :on.ing, streets, drainage facilities and other existing or proposed improvements. Shown on the Retailed plan. 6. Traffic and Transporiation - indicate existing and proposed streets, parking lots, loading areas, access points. Shown on the detailed plan. Parking spaces shall he determined according to Article 1S, Appendix B, Code of Ordinances. i Projected Traffic Generation. Based on traffic study, i 1,232 trips 7. Buildings: a. Approximate location. Shown on detailed plan. b. Maximum height: 23' - 0" c. Minimum setbacks: Shown on detailed plan. d. Maximum gross floor area (square feet) for non-residential: Retail uses: 14,800. If used with auto service: 14,030. Administrative and Professional office usesr 20,S73. I Auto Service area: 3,968. 8. Residential Subdivision: a. Number of units per acre (density): N/A b. Number and location of lots: (shown on concept or detailed plan.) _ N/A 1 r c. Minimum site, width and depth of lots: (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) N/A 1 d. Minimum front, side and rear year setbacks: (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) N/A 1 248Sx/14 ~ i Development Standards Page 3 9. Water and Drainage - approximate location of all existing or proposed creeks, ponds, lakes, floodplains, other water retention or major drainage facilities and improvements. Shown on detailed plan. 10. Utilities - location of all major sewer, water or electrical lines and facilities. Shown on detailed plan_ Location of existing trees 3" in diameter - six (6) feet from ground 11. level: None. 12. Open Space - location and size of greenbelts, parks, common and i recreational areas: Shown on detailed plans 13. Screening - location, type and size of all fences, berms or screening features: Shown on detailed plan. 8' - 0" high -oncrete fence and Shumard Oak tree line along north property line, and an 8' high precast concrete fence from site property line to Piney Creek, behind Mervyn 's as shown on detailed plan. 14. Development Schedule Detailed.-Plan - showing date to start construction and cooplete construction, and rate of development. All dates should indicate month and year: All approvals March 20, 1991; Start construction - April, 1992 Complete construction - September, 1993 1S. Landscaping Plan - major features and types of landscaping to be used: Shown on the detailed plan. 16, signs must o conform to location, ArUclen17 sofe the toning detailed glan; otherwise, 1S' Nigh ISO square feet in effective area. See Stan Lighting _ Standards addendum. AMA, MIAMI r Development Standards Page 4 17. Sidewalks: Shown on detailed plan. 18. All information required for preliminary plat in accordance with Appendix A (Denton Development Code) of the Code of Ordinances: The property is platted, j 19. Development Schedule (detailed plan) - indicating start and I completion of construction and the rate of development. Add dates should include month and year. D.P. January 8, 1991 e All Approval April 1, 1991 f Start Construction - April 9, 1991 Complete Construction - September 11, 1991 20. Muffler and seat cover repair will not take place on the sites Work on autora;,lles outside the building will not oc.ur. ' I Engine o: transmission removal, assembly or disassem',ly of auto body parts will not be permitted on the site. No auto br.ly work J t including painting will be permitted on the premise. Display or sale of used or second-hand merchandise will not occur. 21. Building Elevation and Color. See Addendum 2. Sli~aae shown on this addendum is not applicable. i I y E I 1 2485x/16 1 'h ANZW= TO O><t'1L01xm 814a ?,Z= V amum Owneres/pep "I intent is to provide the typical commercial signage as followe on principal exterior elevations as Mpireds sly UJMTZOws Composed of three signs c,:_ Each sign Reads internally illuminated aluminum boxed letters it" 8 x 140-40 L x 4-1/3" x i 3. ~L internally illuminated alusinum boxed letters 3' 9 x 191-40 i. x i•1/3" q ~ 57 aq* fto internally illuainated alumiu m boxed letters lt" M x i3'-9" L x 4.1/30 M 40 zoom see attached sievation spy t cones" of three signs sack Biqa lleadst i. ~ internally illuminated +slusinva boxed letters is" 1 2 140-40 L x 4-1/3" M 3. nLm= `nt"TAllyoilluminat d alusim box" latterm 3 internally illuminated alusim s boxed letters lt" K x 13 •to L x 4-1/34 V i ..Iy ` 4. nom 1 I - r- WF -"w P'PHS /l~Ihs • •2'!H ~x4M F 15' High Pylon sign - 160 sq. Lt, internally iiluninated plastic sign with alumnae Lam. i f r fff i I i i i t I i E i } t w is _ 1 ADDINI M TO 0M.LUPMENT STANDARDS { SIGN LIGHlING STANDARDS i MONU ! 81981 1S' NIGH x 10' LONG DULL AM LIGHT Gi D D 31 SIGN AT EAST SLIVATION 11 NIGH AT NOUTN MMATION { • ~ 111f111 I I 1 11 1 1 m ' A^ + .p^K~' .....sCr ♦ ry.'r w„a 7v i 4• ,.i 11tf t ~,i.a~ r .ia,r 5tY5 Y ~94Yd r oa f p', r ,w,t~ •°,diV'99~ k„?;.1~k'f ~~y1 rte ~ t low A{IT+D NANTt j ~tRVK~ [ IBM, I EASY ELEVA11ON PEP BOYS NEW AUTOMOBILE RETAIL CENTER DENTON ; TEXAS i ®no ~ 'rte ~ ~ ~ AvTO rARt~-----.an rr ' eaavr.,a., ua,T w,c elms T -r 6 mg~r (m • IAMT emmm" (M.) O • • SOUTH 'ELEVA110 r•. r Y ~ s r If , v ~a Z q M w ~ Z Q -p Y r. oo r o µ 0 eon ~ml i► r po m i vI , e qtr Lie t ~ , lit pp~ a. t E EXTENT Of OECORATIVE V-0'. HICH t~~'o R,~;;;, CONCRETE WAIL 9V YHE JOINT VENTURE . 'i 4000' MGM WALL RV Pit BOYS PI E C EK ~ s ORti `1 ~+r SAN I. PLAZA € . ~u 4 E OWN pho 11" a Y yyf owiawusiu` ; r d~T~),~/ . .155; 1...~ ! , Lms . 41 II r . Owl DATEtianuary 22,1991 ~ITY_4DY,YS~IL_HBPQST TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY, j a 1 SE~4ML~ENDdTTb23s We recommend this ordinance be approved as 1 written and that the Mayor be authorized to execute the ordinar.oe. SjNHAJjys This ordinance is to allow the City of Denton to I purchase one Siewena-Allis Circuit Breaker from Texas Municipal Power Agency bid and exempting the purchase from the City of Denton bid process. The price is $60,850.00 and the circuit breaker is intended for use in the Arco Substation switching assembly. BAU92 ND: Ordinance document, Interlocal Agreement, Purohaee Request 140593 and memo date 11/18/89 from Ray Wells to Robert Nelson. PBQg~idt3B,.DEPeBTlIEt~T_48_9fl4liYB_d£E&4TEPt Electric Substation Division, T.M.P.A., Arco Substation. FIBDAL.I~iP.dS~Ts Funds for the purchase of this circuit breaker will be taken fror, Electric Bond Funds account # i 612-080-F001-9217-1801. { } Respect ully submitteds L1 V. Harrell City Manager A proved byt Nimbi Tom D. Shaw, C.Y.M, Titlet Purohasing Agent TS/Jh i 103.DOC E V s { ~a ,PREP t a KWIW~ n .FWM r tmpao ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY FOR THE PURCHASE 138 KV CIRCUIT BREAKERS FOR THE ARCO SUBSTATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSs G: JECTION I. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute an interlocal agreement between the City of Denton and the Texas Municipal Power Agency for the purchase of 138 kv circuit breakers for the Arco substation, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. SECTION II. That the expenditure of funds in an amount not to exceed $60,850 is hereby authorized. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR i ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERS, CITi SECRETARY I j i BY$ APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: f DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCHt CITY ATTORNEY BY I ~ 1 / 1VW ~ k6 . L ~I.. r .r FtM1:i.ie j.. • RYr4. 1 r 3004L INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY This agreement is made this day of 19 between the City of Denton,-~e as and the Texas Municipal Power Agency, a political subdivision of the State of Texas. Pursuant to the authority granted by the Texas Interlocal Cooperation Act (Article 4413(32c) V.A.T.S.) providing for the cooperation between local governmental bodies, the parties hereto, in consideration of the premises and mutual promises contained r herein, agree as follows: 1. The City of Denton, Texas (CITY) makes, constitutes and appoints the TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY, (AGENCY) its true and lawful breakers p for the purchasing subtitation the purchase athe AGENCY'S kPurchasing Program. CITY agrees that the AGENCY shall be the purchasing agent for said items, and AGENCY agrees to conduct the bidding of such purchases in accordance with the applicable statutes and laws in effect during the term of this Agreement. M II. i The CITY agrees that all specifications for said items shall be as determined by the AGENCY. III. The CITY shall be responsible for payment directly to the vendor under each contract entered into pursuant to the i ll be vendor BSicompliancei gg withp q1 1 ram Condit oneaof delive y ons e dlquality tof the purchased items. IV. Lloyd V. Harrell is hereby designated as the official representative to act for the CITY in all matters relating to the program, including the designation of specific contracts in which the CITY desires to participate. V. This agreement shall take effect upon execution by the for he specified execution acshall be in ceptance and effect payent from the date of l until signatories delivery and has been completed. r 1 A IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their authorized officers the day and year first above written, d CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS j ELOYD s V. , ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: a i APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY j BY: G TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY -EUTM ATTEST: SECRETARY i E 1 i 1 a ~ i P.O. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE CITY OF DENTON r k" °Y acnw ft." Coe. P gmNd DATE: D 6- CIO REQUEST # 1 0 93 x A WE~s to Il>a No ~'9°f¢Y 'mrbn Asti tor C~hied b6 Nm b y~Wndar Addron f • M• f f f-~ .3--7100 ah KID gy stty TO,. Ma °"scfou! I ~ ~ OSO (f 0 j .2 ~ ~ Culal~AnOw.~T £ 42 YL S C- t 'i roa s 4 673 - 24 - 1 s COMMENTS: ` CONRRMATION YES Cl Blr, x BUDGET TOTAL L TMY l?dl Can odltr Cod. W.da Cotoloq N. u a Coo 1 Y~ W 0, Total CN? D►bipi'on + 1 £ AcA. r 6 Bso°- £a. rvo. M ti i; Q. i C f mutt dartM~iq Copy YELLOW *h h mg Iwi bo 4Wood wltf, POI PAGE TOTAL ji,- -P*quhowwo Cary n 5D.-" "AT ACRE! WriN {UOOET TOTAL PNK r ADDOMIACK OF ONAL"ORMATION R AND OCOM A COMMENTS , PURCi1ASlN0 DATE III y r i 1 t owl r OED i8 I i ~ i DCITYoIDENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES 1901 -A Texas Street/ DentorJX76201 M E M O R A N D U M 11 TO. Robert Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities lA' FROM: Ray Wells, Supt, of Electric Metering/Substations/Comm. ~R DAM October 18, 1990 LL ~ SUBJECTt ARCO SUBSTATION PROJECT The Arco Distribution substation lour C I-P Project No 91-0255-01) necessitates our purchase andinstallation.of a 138 f KV breaker to complete the ring bus at the Arco, T.M.P.A. switching station. Since T.M.P.A. already has an active bid working, we can save about 15% by purchasing directly from T.M.P.A. I suggest we take advantage of these savings by placing our required order now and utilizing their specifications and bid. I have attached purchase request form no. 140593 for your signature. s RDWtth 10180096 f ~ I { 1 I I r~ 1 F F • d ~ < t ° #t" t. 4,~ Jd' ~KJ+~'.dc1M"a"!.'~3' a~M ~fi„ro9~,:,ti.- + Z a . P. q VlI1'~ 1 CY:F . , are. r w W t ~ ~~H. M r Ygy.A.te.aw aa.e"at w-f-,a ''o4R° 1{~~VICR AM tA1lT= Fl 14 . i EAST ELEVATION PEP BOYS NEW AUTOMOBILE RETAIL CENTER DENTON ; TEXAS 'r h r - r ~rno Tir, r1r ti AUTO PARTi----raa ay ' oaz ra wrt m r . I ►M/F CQ111dS {TI►a Q ` 46 41 i SOUTH "ELEVATION f ' r [ ! Si ri e ~ ~r 1 z 0 ~ . x m ~ i eo 0 0 zm`~ 03 ® X m N INININI d . a 0 D i I yy ION i+t Reference Materials Solid Waste Alternatives City Council Meeting January 22, 1991 r, y i a i ,I r r 2 Yl `a Source: Utility Administration-City Hall•R.E, Nelson 1991 r r i----- _ - I I I I j TABLE OF CONTENTS I I I f Pg. # MEMO TO COUNCIL I + OUTLINE OF BASIC SCENARIOS,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 10 I f COMPARISON RESIDENTIAL RATES,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,14 I f CUMULATIVE REVENUE GAIN 15 I ANALYSIS ASSUMPTIONS 16 j CODE DEFINITIONS........., I SCENARIO SUMMARIES........ 19 I I GENERALIZED PROS AND CONS.. 28 IMPACT ON CURRENT EMPLOYEES BENEFITS COMPARISON......,,,,, 30 f f ASSUMPTION FOR FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 38 + PROCEEDS FROM SALE OF COMMERCIAL 41 I r ' LANDFILL DEPRECIATION 41 1 DECISION TREES 43 { i SCENARIO It NARRATIVE, PROFORMA, TABLE 46 SCENAR70 20 to It it E + SCENARIO 3, to of „ 60 SCENARIO 41 it old* 67 I SCENARIO 51 " H SCENARIO 6, to of u 81 s f SCENARIO 7, " N to + SCENARIO 8, n to f 95 Y C { ~ r I f I w~ ~ r f ~ Ti I I V v f ~ Q I 1 CIrY of awrom, rJ=S MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. AieKINND' / D.NTON, TEXAS 76201 Jaruary 17, 1991 TO: Mayor and Menbers of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager RE: SALE Of THE COMMERCIAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SYSTEM RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utilities Board has discussed this item at two of its meetings and Is stilt In the prcoess of formulating a specific recommendation. This report Is provid&d for Informational purposes and no Council action Is expected at this time. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: Based upon directions received by the City Cantu, bids were let for the sale of the Commerclal Solid Waste Collection System on November 9., 1990. Four bids were received and opened on 'he sate of the system on December 11, 1990, A brief sumrory of th.• b.,i recalve is as follows' { SOLID SOLID WASTE WASTE ACCOUNT TOTAL OOE VEHICLES EQUIftV LIST Texas Waste $251,000 $2490000 $10400,000 $109000000 Management, Inc. Browning- $2210000 $437,105 21 add on $644,105 Ferris franchise J Industries for 3 years 1 Laldlaw $2110500 $980800 $890000 $5990300 ? Waste Systems Chambers No Bid No, Bid No Bid No Bid Waste Systems 1 1A2/1A1/0109910289V/S66'8200 DIFIV METRO 434•2329 "1 r ~ 10.1. e4 AL nt 1 ~t cr 91M~ t SALE - COMMERCIAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SYSTEM Jarxjary 17, 1991 Page 2 It Is apparent that the bid offered by Texas Waste Management Is, by far and avay, the best bid received for the system. The offer by BFI to increase the license fee by two percent (28) for three years would only generate $88,200 in additional funds over the throe-year period bringing the total value of their bid to an estimated $732,309. Given the great disparity In the two highest bids, staff has elected to focus Its attention on the bid offered by Texas Waste Management. Based upon the Texas Waste Management bid, staff has conducted a detailed analysis of the impact of selling the system at the prlca of c?: $1.9 million. In our analysis, we have fo:used our attention on several factors, which Include: the pros and cons of selling the Comnerclal system; the impact on the current employees In the Co morclat Division/ the financial Impact on the City of Denton; the effect on camnerclal, iandflll, and residential rates; and the Impact on the life expectancy of the City's landfill, Data utilized In this analysts has originated from the Waste Management bid package, a negotiation session with Waste Management representatives, City of Denton personnel policies, and the current and projected financial performance of the Solid Waste Division and a survey of rates charged in other cornmmiltles. ~ Over the last three weeks, staff has conducted a detailed analysis of this extremely complex Issue. When one considers the two major options r of to sell or not to sell, adds in the various landfill options and then introduces all of the variables which might came Into play, the possibilities appear Infinite. Staff has developed In excess of twenty different scenarios which might occur as a result of the sale. Out of these twenty-plus scenarios, via have pared the mirber of practical scenarios to seven. This report Is detailed Into several parts for clarity purposes, The first portion of the report Involves a brief srrnary of major Issues related to the sale and a brief discussion of each of the seven scenarios. The remainder of the report includes a more detailed treatment of these issues, a listing of assumptions and related notes used In the analysis, and the profonres, tables end graphs for each of the seven scenarlos. TERMS A14D CONDITIONS OF THE SALE During our moettng with TWM representatives, we discussed some key issues relating to the possible sale of the system and the transition of accounts, .2- lA2/lA1/010991028/2 \n 1 VVV 1 SALE - COFrERCIAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SYSTEM January 17, 1991 Page 3 Of particular Interest was the TWd request that the City agree to stay out of the commercial collection business for a period of five (5) years. Although such an agreement was not part of the bid and, therefore, nonbinding, the request appears somewhat reasonable given the Investment TYM Is willing to make. Staff is uncertain as to the appropriateness of the five year time frame as opposed to a shorter time period, c Another key Issue Involves the transition of service. TYM has requested that the City assign its service agreements with its customers to TWa and they will b% In Immediate service to the City customers at a given point in time. The City's tervlce agreements are assignable and can be cancelled with thirty days notice by either party. If the assignments were made, the City customers would receive uninterrupted service and would have thirty days to contract with TM or some other service provider. Such an approach would arlear to offer the L-pother transition possible. TWN has alco agreed to allow the City to direct the waste stream in or out of the City's landfill at a firm price. In reallty, the City's authority to direct the waste stream originates In the ilcense agreement which pertains to all private haulers operating in Denton. Should the City opt to direct the TWM waste stream to the Clty's landflli, we would probably need to do so with the waste stream collected by the other { private haulers operating in Denton. Addltlonally, this option would carry the requirement that the City's landfill tlpping fees remain cenpetltlvo with the tipping fees charged at other area landfills. IMPACT ON CORAERCIAL EMPLOYEES The bid specifications on the sale of the system require that the successful bidder hire and maintain the employment of the City's existing can. rclal employees for a minimum of six (6) months. TWd has Indicated they Intend to rataln each of these Individuals i through retirement depending upon their performance and TWd bull- li ness conditions. A comparlson of benefits for both organizations Indleates that TWM and COD baneflt packages eoe comparable with TWA t being superlor in some instances and deN clent in others. Further discussion and speclilc beneflt comparlsons are included in Section II of supporting documentation for this report. f I i W/1A1/010991028/3 -3- I I ~ f r { pVA W . r Mliio.r lw~ SALE - COMMERCIAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SYSTEM January 11, 1991 Page 4 FINANCIAL IMPACT ON THE CITY OF DENTON Obviously, the $119 million offered by TWM would allow for the resolution of the Sanitation Fund's financial ills. These funds could be used to pay off the Fund's noncash deficit of $500,000 caused by depreciation expense and could also be used to pay off the current landfill debt over the life of that department. Other liabilities these funds would cover include the debt owed for the payoff of cammercial C equipment and the accrued vacation time due the cammerclal employees. Most of these expenses would be paid over a period of years as we want to Invest as much of the funds as possible at interest rates higher than our Interest payments. Any of the unrestricted funds and the Interest earnings could be used over the next few years to offset Incroases in residential rates. Further discussion of this issue Is included in Sections III and IV of the supporting documentation for this report. IMPACT ON COMMERCIAL RATES As we are uneware of the financial needs of TMM and the other private haulers, It Is Impossible to predict the ca... rcial rates which would be t r charged should the City remove Itself frun the business. We fool that the current pricing practices of the City sets a benchmark which the private haulers currently follow and the sale of the system would eliminate the City's participation in benchmark pricing. We can only assume that the remaining competition for cam. rclal business will dictate favorable rates for core. rclal and Induutrlal customers, IMPACT ON RESIDENTIAL RATES The sale of the com. rclal system may have a positive effect on residen- tlal rates under certain circumstances. The actual impact varies from scenario to scenario. The graph following this summary attempts to depict the specific impxt that the different scenarios will have on residential rates and each possibility is discussed in detail In Sec- tlon IV of the supporting documentation for this report, J i 1A2/IAI/010991028/4 a1 y 1, i i bSMtlp~ J j V 1 j SALE - CCWERCIAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SYSTEM January 17, 1991 fpq Page 5 IMPACT ON LANDFILL RATES in most of the scenarlos, the necessary Incresses In landfill disposal rates were held relatively low. ObvlouslY, there was sorts fluctuation In rates from scenario to scenarlo, but rates were held relatively constant In all scenarios except those involving landfill expansion. A more detailed discussion of the Impact on landfill rates Is Included In Section IV of the supporting documents for this report. IMPACT ON LANDFILL LIFE EXPECTANCY In the scenarlos reviewed In this report, the estimated landfill I closure data closure dates fluctuates are u discussed Sfor ~eachlscenarioh in eSection~IVS of Specific supporting documents for this report. NET GAIN LOSS a. E Once aQeln, the financial parfortmance of the system expressed through net gain/(loss) varied from scenario to scenario. The graph entltled, s "Cumulative Revenue Geln)" following this summary depicts the effect of i' each scenario. Further discussion of this Issue is Included In Section IV of the supporting documentation for this report. Rsspectf y submitted, 4 9 lrv / p° L1 arret CItY Manager { Pr,+pared by: Io 1 611 I Angelo Director of Community Services Approved byl R. E. Nelson Executive Director of Utilities r, 1 IW IAI/010991046/5 .S. I , , T 1 t} fo: December 18, 1990 Mr. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager. City of Denton r 215 E. McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Dear sire The Board of Directors and Government Relations Committee of the Denton Chamber of Commerce would like to inform the ` city of our position regarding the bid process for local I commercial and industrial solid waste collection and disposal. we feel that the City Council and staff are to be commended for taking this step of bidding to relieve the taxpayers from the burden of having to subsidise the commercial and industrial collection systems. Having been involved in this process since September of 1989, it is our belief that the best alternative for De.lton businesses and individuals is the Request for ; Proioaal whereby the Citwould mail their trucks t and allow a free market •qutpment, and customer ire systam to continue to operate in the City of Denton. The reasons for our support of this particular R.P.P. #1181 are as followsi 1. The business community would continue to have a Aamocratic choice when selecting their service provider. Z. The competitive situation would cause the private contractors to provide responsive, innovative service techniques to give the customers the most effective system for their needs. 3. Pricing would be controlled by the market. Businesses would have the option to "shop" for the most cost effective system. Competition would drive prices and service toward maximum efficiency. ha 4. Through the licensing process, the business community would look to the City to ensure reasonable standards of safety and aesthetics. DENTON CHAMBER OF .COMMERCE MACM6011. 114 PARKWAY P. 0. MAMA P DENTON, TEXAS 1620'2.111! TELErPHONE 1114UNO w i 1 j Mr. Lloyd Harrell Decombsr 18, 1990 Page 2 we also see advantages that would immediate impact the City's financial pictur* and indirectly benefit the businesses. 1. At current volume levels the license fee of 8% of revenue would annually generate better than $100,000 in net income to the City. 2. The projected 1991 loss of $100,000 for the City's operation would be eliminated. 3. In addition, proceeds generated from the sale of the customer list could be used to greatly reduce, if not eliminate, debt service related to the solid waste service and disposal. This would ultimately benefit all of the taxpayers. We have also had the op rtunity to obtain infomtion on landfill options. The c~ammittea feels that it might be in the best interest of the oitisens and the City to explore these options before spending large auma of money that { could be batter used elsewhere. To vita 1. Private landfills are willing to grant long term, guaranteed disposal space at , fixed price with minimal escalators based on the C.P.I. and government regulations and requirements. This would not only eliminate development and operating costs, but it would also do away with the long term liabilities associated with the now federal regulations. 2. @its availaabble lit miQghthebe bwisel 1 consider oitisen convenience centers or the more elaborate and sophisticated transfer station concept. In 1 either case, private induct would probably be willing to assume the f7nancial burden of developing the site and would probably consider paying ti;a.City a fee for allowing them to do so. I It is our recommendation that the City contact some private companies to sea what they have to offer before we commit to a program that may again get us into an unfavorable situation such as we are now experiencing. I .7. 1 1 i + 1 Mr. Lloyd Harrell December 18, 1990 Page 7 s ~►gain we would like to reiterate our support of the retsn~ion of a oosz+etitive situation in the commercial and the Cndustof 1 Desolid nton wands would s sincerely appreciate n your City consideration of our position. sincerely, Jer cott$ Chairman dov rrsent Relations Committee { cos Mayor council Members a, ^r a 1 f ~a, mKrqua~. r ,aa r~ DEC % 7 W AA 1421 Noah Elm 1101 C psu.- OFFi~r CNnlon, Tsxu 76201 December 180 1990 City of Denton Utilities t-~ 214 E, He Kinney Denton, TX 76201 ATTNi Lloyd Harrell Dear Mr. HaCrelll I understand that a vote will be forthcoming regarding the vaste removal system currently in place with the City of Denton. I &a- Chairperson of the Denton Apartment Association and representing the 2%jority of the property owners in this city would like to take this opportunity to voice our position that we,prefer the buy out option versus the exclusive contract alternative. Our association which manages the majority,of multi family units in this town and therefore have a ettong interest in the direction the City plans to pursue in this matter, please feel free to contact me should you have any questions or comments, 8lncerely, y sa h J, Mikelonis 00 Chairpersons Denton Apartment Association c,c, City Council Wabsts Waynard IIYM Texas 1laste 14anagement Hob Castleberry g Randall Boyd it .q. IA-31 Mp%r4h Ciro MIMI rlanlnn Towa• 7AOA1 10471 0401.0404 401 Al 0147 A1%M et. e Y~ y. tl Y Ytlw}, J k CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION January 22, 1991 Solid Waste Alternatives Basic Scenarios There are three basic scenarios which generally fall into the categories of; 1) SCENARIO 1 (CS-LA-DH) i Sell the Commercial System, accelerate filling of the landfill and close the landfill and direct haul residential waste or have Texas Waste Management install a transfer station. -1 2. SCENARIO 6 (CR-LC-LE) Continue on our present course and retain the commercial system and s continue present volume in the landfill, expand the landfill when necessary, probably 1996. 3. SCENARIO 8 (CRE-LI-LE) f Retain the commercial system as exclusive, alightly increase landfill volumes with additional commercial and expand the landfill when necessary, probably in 1996. SCENARIO 1 is where Denton sells the system, gets out of the landfill operations as soon as possible, but still provides a local transfer station via contract or provides a local convenience dump station, and retains the residential collection system. The result is as followss (Year) 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Rates 9.95 9.95 9.95 10.15 10.80 11.35 12.00 12.95 13.85 14.65 Ana.Rev. 622 1087 1284 (529) (260) (280) (260) (212) (112) 12 Lic.Fee 0 0 0 0 48 102 159 219 227 235 Net present value of annual revenue funds is: ;1,573,000 Note: Net present value is the amount of money you would need today, which if you invested at 7.5% interest, would provide cash revenues equal to the Annual Revenue amounts. -10- i 41 r r The main advantayes of Scenario 1 aret a) The City of Denton would receive approximately 511500,000 by 1993; b) Denton can relieve itself of the very uncertain liabilities of being in the landfill business; c) the commercial customers would have the full freedom to choose any private hauler; d) The city would receive license fees equal to 8% of gross commercial revenues after 1997 which. In 2000 equals $235,000 per year. e) Denton's residential rates would hold steady at $9.95 yearl then would at $14.85/year }with estimated 3.5 to 41 CPI increases thereafter. The elimination of the liability of the landfill Is perhaps the major advantage In that If, in the future, It is determined by oustartelaorndfilfelduendralerregula"tors ourtlasomethig ndfill" option,lo the itaxpayers nof~ Denton would be liable for the cleanup of such hazardous waste. If a private firm takes the solid waste, they are required to establish a bond and reserves for such eventualities andr of r course, they always have the option of bankruptcy wherein the state or federal government would step in with the environmental super fund and provide the cleanup. The disadvantaves are. a) Dentoi; would no longer serve as the competitive benchmark pries. for commercial collection system or as a standard of service. The private free enterprise market would set the prices. b) Denton would no longer serve as a benchmark for competitive landfill prices In the area. The private free enterprise market and the city of Farmers Branch j landfill would set the prices. However, if landfill 1 prices get too far out of what Is determined a fair price, the Upper Trinity Regional Water District could In,tall a landfill and provide that competitive benchmark ' price. c) D thI3 scenario than enton's residential fees are estimated to be more with with the landfill However, substantialuncertaintyexistssion scenarios costs an liabilities of future landfill expansions. i J -11• I 1 t k SCENARIO 6 is where Denton continues in our present mode, competing n with private haulers in the commercial collection system, continuing to provide residential collection service, continuing to operate the landfill and, via competitive rates, continuing to bring in 10,000 cubic yards of volume (;320,000 to $350,OJ0 of contract hauler volumes to the landfill) and then plan to expand the landfill in 1996. Effects are as follower (Year) 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Retes 9.95 10.25 10.25 10.25 10.25 10.45 11.75 11.95 11.95 12.35 Ann.Rev. 12 (8) 34 76 (3) 1 (8) 9 (15) 10 Lic.Fee 0 0 0 0 13 25 41 54 56 58 Net present value of annual revenue funds is $91,000. The advantages are that: c?- a) Denton keeps on status quo; b) Denton provides a competitive factor in the setting of landfill rates and commercial rates in the area; f c) Residential rates remain lower in later years, $12.25/mo. vs $14.85/mo. for Scenario 1. The disadvantages are: a) Residential rates could increase to $15.50/mo. if competition continues to erode Denton's commercial customer base. b) The city will continue to be liable for the landfill. c) The city will not receive the $10500,000 from 1991 through 1993 as a result of the sale of the commercial system. d) Denton would have to develop another landfill/disposal option by 2003. e) The city would only receive $58,000 per year in license fees in 2000 vs $235,000 if the commercial system is sold. f) The city would be exposed to substantial criticism if residential or commercial rates must increase more than projected due to factors of which we are presently not aware. g) Residential rates must increase slightly next year, from $9.95 to $10.25. The major disadvantage may be the liability involved with the landfill. As noted in Scenario i, the city will continue to , Increase its liability for landfill regulations and hazardous wastes so long as it continues to operate a landfill. There is also substantial uncertainty as to whether Denton's share of the commercial customers will remain constant or will continue to decline. A basic premise of the SWAC Committee report was that Denton may continua to lose customers, and this would drive the coat up to the remaining commercial and residential customers. Denton has the least control over whether additional commercial customers are lost unless the city would choose to subsidize commercial rates with general tax revenues. -12- , COMMONNESS ~ yf t... r.~s+aa' i { r SCENARIO 8 is essentially the SWAC recommendation, wherein Denton would become the exclusive collection in Denton, Dentonovwould °f commercial residential solid waste and continue to cosolid llectwaW approximatel Denton would expand the landfill in y 1996 and would need to look for landfill/disposal option by 2003. The results are as . an additional (Year) 1991 1942 1993 follows. 1494 1.;.35 1996 1947 1998 1999 2000 Rates 9.95 10.15 10.15 10.25 10.60 11.35 12.00 12.70 13.10 aa.Rev. 12 23 7 ' Alc.ee 0 0 154 370 465 266 418 13.45 0 0 0' 0 0 0 320 617 Total 12 23 ~0 0 7 '154 320 465 266 418 Cumulative 12 36 520 617 (w/o l1c.fee 46 203 388 1097 1446 1972 2640 x11X lat.) 3455 Net Present Value: $1,802,000 The main adva_ stages are: a) The residential rates scenario 1 (sell commercials a little lower than for the same level as Scenario 6 If the city ddesired tlessnnot return. b) with the rate levels chosen r ` residential and commercial feesanbunl not revenues f al $617,000. These funds could be used by the city dfor any ' purpose desired, equal 1 annual license fee Inn2000sIsnestimated eto be $235000 per year. If residential and commercial rates were reduced by 66, the annual net revenue of Scenari equal the license fee of Scenario 1. o 8 would c) Denton may serve as a benchmark price for landfill rates to the area. 1i The dieadvantaaes area { e) The city continues to have a liability with the landfill. Denton will be one of the very few municipally owned landfills in the area. b) Denton would have I, option by 2003. LO develop another landfill/disposal c) Commercial customers would not have the option to choose + any other hauler than the city. d) Denton would forego the ;1,500,000 of funds dvailcble from the sale of the system. -13- 1 r ~i a 04 4 i f COMPARISON RESIDENTIAL RATES COMMERCIAL ME/RETAIN OPTIONS 16 15 14 4 13 12 o[ 11 f a 10 9 6 7 4 6 5 O 4 o 3 t 2 1 i 0 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 I~ o CS-LA-DH + CR-LC-LE o CRE-U-LE I ~ j I -1 i E owk CUMULATIVE REVENUE GAIN COMMERCIAL SALE/RETAIN OPV GAIN 4 3.5 3 2.5 I. Z r 3 2 j 1.5 1 0.5 0 1891 1992 19w 1m 1996 i998 1997 1998 i899 2000 i ■ CS-LA-DH + CR-LC-LE o CRE-LI-LE l . VFF t ANALYSIS ASSUMPTIONS o COMPETITION KEEPS COMMERCIAL RATES LOW J1 0 MAIN CONCERNS I -Keeping Residential Rates Reasonably Low cui -Availability of a Local Disposal Site -Landfill Liability o ;11900,000 PAYMENT -;5001000 to Restricted Assets ((;et back when landfill closes) -5180,000 to cover 1991 contingencica (may be too high) r, -$40,000 to cover accrued vacation -$1,180,000 invested at 81 interest -Interest + $118,000/year credited to b residential ratepayers o IN ALL SCENARIOS, RESIDENTIAL RATES ARE INCREASED SO THAT THE RESIDENTIAL COLLECTION SYSTEM IS A BREAK EVEN OPERATION. IN SOME CASES, HOWEVER, ACC1fMULATED REVENUE IS USED SO THAT RATES DON'T FLUCTUATE DRAMATICALLY UP A' AND DOWN, LUT INSTEAD, MAINTAIN A STEADY 3 TO 6% PER YEAR INCREASE. Y 1 I I I I l 1 -16- J w 1 I ~ 1 r \ ' ANALYSIS ASSUMPTIONS (page 2) 0 ALL LANDFILL 6 COMMERCIAL COLLECTION SYSTEM PROFITS AND DEFICITS ARE TRANSFERRED TO RESIDENTIAL TO BE USED FOR RATE STABILIZATION OR REVENUE GENERATION. 0 D/FW LANDFILL RATES -$2.50/CU. YD. IN 1991 -Escalates at 5% per year 0 TRANSFER STATION COSTS WERE QUOTED TO BE $6.00/CU.YD IN 1991, WITH ESCALATION ESTIMATED AT 5% PER YEAR. 0 DIRECT HAUL INCREMENTAL COST IS CONSERVATIVELY ESTIMATED AT $3.50 TO $3.70 PER CU.YD. IN 1991. WHEN ADDED TO THE $2.50 PER CU.YD. TIPPING FEE AT D/FW LANDFILL, THIS COMPARES WITH THE $6.00/CU. YD. TRANSFER STATION; THEREFORE ANALYSES WERE DONE USING THE DIRECT HAUL COST, WHICH IN 1994 IS $4.29/CU.YD., PLUS THE ESTIMATED $2.89/CU.YD. TIPPING FEE (i.e. ($2.50/cu.yd 1991 escalated @ 5t/year), FOR A COMBINED DISPOSAL COST OF $7.18/CU.YD. I 0 DENTON LANDFILL RATE INCREASES AS FOLLOWSs I -From $3 to $3.45/CU. YD. IN 1992 and holds there until 1997 -Increases to $4.75/CU. YD. for contract haulers 1 0 KEEP RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL LANDFILL RATE KEPT AT: -$3.05/CU. YD. until 1997 -Increase to $4.75/CU. YO BY 2000 -Expanded Landfill is break even at $4.75/CU. YD. in 2000 o EXPANDED LANDFILL -Will have 3,500,000 cubic yards of space -$3,500,000 cost to open -Bonds Used to Finance -Debt Service Based on 7.51 6 7 year payback -17- , r I t t Code Definitions CR Commercial Retain CS Commercial Sold CRD Comm,Retaln Decreased i CRE Comm.Retain Exclusive LD Landfill-Dec.Fill Rate f LC Landfill-Current Fill Rate LA Landfill Accelerate LE Landfill Expansion t, LI Landfill Increase DH Direct Haul s Solid Waste Options January 1991 -18- .,u. ! P. f CODE CR - COMM AETAN4 Lp _ UND C8 - COMM BOLD LC _ RL.L L DECFEAW FILL LE - LANDU EXAAHW 1 n CFD - C FETAIN DECFFASE tA _ LANDFILL AocELERfy u - l ANDFIN,L MOREASE CF E - C RETAMi EXCLUSM DH - DIRECT HAUL COMMERCIAL OPTIONS ISM 1902 1905 1004 1906 1000 1007 1111 1100 2000 1 SCE AW t RES RATE 9.06 0.16 9.06 10.16 10.00 11.39 1200 1296 15.!!6 14.M1 COMM RATE 115.96 0 0 Q 0 p p o 0 ° C84A-DH ANN W04 R on 1,007 1,21m MR MOM mp IMTEA w o 47 150 t9) 12 251 214 213 208 ~ ga 296 20 ~ 210 i1,tT3 cum Al" R 102 1.763 3,171 9.900 G; 2633 2,7M 9,716 2704 2,716 Slots UCFEE 0 0 0 o b for 160 ADTT4ANS C 35 p Zf9227 236 AD TRANS L 29 30 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f ° 0 0 o p p 9CE RAFS0 2 RES RATE 0.96 9.06 9.06 006 0.06 10.75 11.75 1206 13.06 14.66 ` 0011M RATE 115.55 0 0 0 p C3-LC-DH ANN QAL) R 149 356 200 311 206 237 0 4 0 0 0 (132 1120 119 7 1 401 0 IN"MEW 0 11 39 67 ey 1 106 00 132 CUM 0/(L) R 149 516 120 119 117 7% 1,123 1.412 11755 1 t L1C FEE ,722 1,537 1,500 1,063 0 0 0 0 40 102 1" 210 227 236 AD TRANS C 33 0 0 I AD TRANS L 20 30 32 34 3! 38 ` a o 0 0 SCENARIO 3 RES RATE 9.95 0.06 0.06 996 096 016 1015 11 76 1f fl6 1116 COMM RATE 115 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'CS-Lo-LE-~ ANN W(L) R 140 360 251 417 37o 310 04 IMERE9f 0 1f of 40 (4 t$ L___ 11,616 cUMAf(L) R to 316 we 1,205 1.1`90 2.1111317 $415 0 1SS 110 1!16 63 Z,IIO 2,s-- 5,101 L1C FEE 0 0 0 0 45 102 113 AD TRANS C 33 0 0 0 Z10 1 0 0 ° o 0 0 0 i' ADTRANS L 29 30 32 54 x 3t 40 4$ 4s p BCENAM4 MRATE 9.95 10.06 ti./6 11.06 11.95 1236 1296 1160 14.00 14.00 COMM RATE 115.66 0 0 0 0 0 ° 9 0 1 CB-LD-D1111E ANNOpL.F R (lq _I141 27 ts6 is Ez 1NIERESf ~ ~ 7t i s 541 0 0 0 0 11 17 21 CV6: W(L) R 27 so 41 32 1141 1301 Ist 162 221 204 503 Iss ~ ~ UC FEE 0 0 0 0 46 toe 113 AD TRANS C 33 0 0 0 210 227 236 j AD TRANS L zo So 32 54 ° ° ° ° i 34 ° 38 0 40 43 46 49 rn 1 I JPF Y { ' tr. Yb:'In".J CODE: OR - COMM RETAIN LD - LAN FILL DECADE FILL LE - LANDFILL EXPAN81 C8 - COMM 80LD LC - LANVILL CURRENT FILL U - LANDIML VdCR1W CRID - C RETAIN DECK EABE LA - UMM)FILL ACCELERATE FILL DH - 0ffWW HAUL + CIE - C RETAIN EXC LUSW COMMERCIAL OPTIONS y l901 1902 1990 1964 }990 to" 1907 1940 1940 2000 j SCENIAW S AN RATE 9.96 10.26 10.75 11.00 11.50 1 Z50 19.0 13.715 14.26 16.60 COMM RATE 115.56 119.40 123.70 126.11 132.59 137.23 142.04 149.14 190.0 164.42 CRD-LC-LE ANN AI(L) R 12 42q 44 a 41 122 (76) (40) (13% 3 NPV INTEREST 0 1 0 s 9 13 23 19 14 0 643 CUM 4W R 12 (7) 37 126 176 311 234 140 75 a 00 FEE 0 0 0 0 13 26 41 54 56 S0 AD TRANS C 67 70 73 77 02 a 94 100 100 Its AD TRANS L 29 30 32 34 36 30 40 43 46 40 SCENARIO 8 RES RATE 9.96 10.75 10.0 10.28 10.0 10.0 11.75 11.0 I t.1 12 a COMM MTE 115.66 119.50 129.70 125.11 132.50 137.29 142.04 149.14 166.90 102.90 CR-LC-LE ANN W R 12 (A 34 74 (3) 1 (0) 9 (15) 10 NF'V WTEREST 0 1 0 3 9 9 t0 10 12 i S0} CUM W(w R 12 5 3S Its 124 194 136 Is$ 152 174 1 UC FEE 0 0 0 0 13 26 41 51 60 60 AD TRANS C 67 70 713 77 02 40 94 100 100 113 1 AD TRANS L 29 s0 32 34 s6 33 40 43 44 40 1 8CENARI0 7 RES RATE 9.95 10.25 10.60 11.00 11.50 12.00 1260 13.95 14.00 15.00 COMM RATE 115.55 119.40 123.76 17!.11 132 O 137.28 14104 t4i.t4 IWO 164.42 CR-L0-0H A1NOp1.) R 12 (0) as 210 235 340 02111 0250) (140) 29 NPV 1NTE1If.6T 0 1 0 7 909 44 40 27 H 1 $21 CUM OI(L) R 12 5 96 $13 S72 010 340 151 Is 40 uo FEE 0 0 0 6 1s 26 41 64 84 66 AD TRANS C 47 70 73 77 a a 101 190 115 122 AD TRANS L 20 30 32 34 M 30 0 0 0 0 BCENARIIO 5 RES RATE 9.96 WAS 10.15 10.25 10.00 11.35 1200 12.70 13.10 13.46 ~ COMM RATE 115.65 97.05 100.45 106.90 107.40 111.37 115.27 121.04 127.06 Is0.44 CRE-U-LE ANN WW R 12 23 154 579 646 290 410 an 617 NPV NTEREST 0 1 3 is 44 a 106 140 $1,602 CUMOM) R 12 36 46 205 600 1.00 1,46 1,972 2,900 456 LIC FEE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AD TRAN6 C 07 90 10l 190 Its 120 120 137 140 165 AD TRAM L 29 30 32 54 36 30 40 44 46 0 i 1 i I _I 1 R • r K9X~ f QOMPARISON RESIDENTIAL RATES z COMMERCIAL SALE OPTIONS O 20 w O.. 15 W 10 lillis Q 5 Z W O 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 CS-LA-DH CS-LC-DH CS-LC-LE CS-LD-DH/LE I t I` t r k 1 COMPARISON RESIDENTIAL DATES 2 COMMERCIAL RETAIN OPTIONS zo cc: W 1s a -I n 7 I- , Q w- X + CRD-LC-LE_._. CR-LC-LE -4,- CR-LC-DH CRE-LI-LE i CUMULATIVE REVENUE CAIN COMMERCIAL SALE OPTIONS 3.5 3 2.5 r I~ y v. 2 J .5 0 I •5 CS-LA-DH CS-LC-DH CS-LC-LE CS-LD-DH/LE I . r ,y i 1 CUMULATIVE REVENUE GAIN COMMERCIAL RETAIN OPTIONS 4 3 C4 2 f Z J 1 1 ~7 16 we a 0 i { 1 CRD-LC-LE-*- CR-LC-LE CR-LC-DH CRE-LI-LE Y k x.. r SALE ✓a: OF F } COMMERCIAL SYSTEM SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION t 1 a y Ly K k f t; • fAtroinootn~Rn -25- i n' wrr~ r ~ fill, SALE OF W41ERCIAL SYSTEM i SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION i f I° SECTION I - Generalized Pros and Cons SECTION II - Impact on Current Employees Benefits Comparison t SECTION III - Assurpttons for Financial Analysis Proceeds from Sale of Coi, rclal a' Landfill Depreciation Scenarios Decision Trees by SECTION IV - Scenario 11 - Narrative, Proforma, Table Scenario A? - Narratlve, Profonna, Table Scenario 13 - Narrative, Proformso Table Scenario 04 - Narrative, Proforme, Table Scenario 05 - Narrative, Profonne, Table Scenario N6 - Narrative, Profonne, Table Scenario 07 - Narrative, Profonne, Table Scenario 08 - Narrative, Profonma, Table 1 p, { I ~c i ~ Y f f SALE OF CMIERCIAL SYSTEM 1 v ~ SECTION I - Generaitzcd Pros art! Cons ~ i } i s r c 1lNr c b i IA2/lAl/010991029/9 -27- 1 1 , SALE OF COWERCIAL SYSTEM PROS 1. Proceeds from :ale would retire Landfill Debt and Solid Waste Fund deficit. 2, Allows Solid Waste Management Staff to focus on other Issues. 3. Roduces City's liability exposure. 4. Eliminates the necessity of maintaining or replacing expensive equipment. 5. Private company may be able to adapt bore quickly to technological Innovations as Industry changes. 6. Future residential rate Increases may be delayed and/or decreased under certain conditions. 7. Potential for extending life of landfill. 1 i 8. Appears to meet the needs of the busirx3ss com "n1ty as expressed by the Chamber of Commerce. i 9. Increases the proceeds the City receives from prlvote hauler license fees. i 10. Reduces potential risks for City In to" of landfill V abllftles ` and reduction In commercial customer base. 6 N i N r 1 i i -28- I IA2/IAl/010991028/10 i w WF' i SALE OF COf+IERC1AL SYSTEM CONS 1. Potential for eliminating any real benchmark pricing for Cmn-erclal rates. 2. Potential for eliminating any real competition In the norkett may create an unregulated monopoly. 3. Potential for higher Com. rclai rates. 4. Potential for higher Residential rates.' 5. Potential for a decrease In quality of services given to customers. 6. Potential for dissatisfaction by some City customers. 1. Decrease In responsiveness to customers. a. Cost of gettrng tack Into business If necessary. I 9. impact on existing employees. 10. Reduction In transfer to the General fund. 11. Cost of Drop Box Recycling Program must be assumed by Residential. 12. Less support in terms of manpower and equipment for Residential, Disposal, and other City divisions. 13. Potential for Increasing Code Enforcement complaints and Officer workload. i ~r -29- lA2/lAl/010991028/11 - 1 I i i 1 SALE OF COPMERCIAL SYSTEM } 1 h SECTION II - impact on Current Employees ' Benefits Comparison l ~ I 3s C> l V Y pk{y{ r 3 lavntnaain~n~,~ -30-' r t M i If III r "a cc` ` h 1FtPACT ON COFMERCIAL EMPLOYEES One of our primary concerns rela system has been the ! Live to the potential sale of the Commercial such the City's CommercialRCollection Division VeWeocurrentlyuha etaefe empl s in with approximately 20 years service to the City and the majority with atlleast yees four years service. In almost every case, these extremely loyal and dedicated Individuals who cons stently have m beynand to be consistently Perform concerned the normal expectations of their positions. Obviouslyp we are r these Individuals be taken care of in the event of the sale of the systterm that j In this regard, the bid specification prepared by the City required the bidders to hire and maintain the employment of the Camorcial Dlvislon's 1; for a minimum of six month to to retain two of the s from the sale of the system. We intend, Vers I cri maintain our o cli positions through our Residential Division In order to recyng programs currently conducted by the Commercial Divislol. While Texas Waste Management Is only obligated to r,3tain our employees for six months, they have Indicated that they intend to retain these rettrement If the employees' performances are satisfacto employees until very attractive salary plan which is somewhat better than thelCltY serfor Ct's. In some si filar positionstnst +a ben f i TMpacka isg which is at least comparable to the few cases, such as sick leave and vecatlon leave, eitheir benefitstare,les than I ` one City provides. In our meeting with TM representatives, they have also 1 agreed to honor our employees' dates of hire with the City relative to TWM vacation benefits and allow our the TM savl employees to ro!l their TMRS contributions into an. organizationsngIs irk udedAIn fo lyourcreviewson of benefit packages for both i r' ti J -31- 1 J ~I 1 n. BENEFIT COMPARISON BEIfEf I T TWI CITY NOTES i e, VACATION 5 days - 1 year 15 days/year 320 hours maximun 4 10 days - 2 years 15 days - 7 years carry over. 20 days - 15 years I~ w BONUS VACATION N/A 4 hours for each , N year worked past the 5th year. IM SICK LEAVE 601 of base earn- 12 days/year :-faxfmun accrual Ings up to maximum of 720 hours, ' of $300/week for 20 weeks, begins on 8th day of sick- f ness. I 1 i I#UL IDAYS I 1 days/year 9 days/Year ; t 1 IAI/0109910R/9 a 1 I 1 1 II pENEF 1 T TW'I CITY NOTES ~ LONGEVITY PAY N/A $4 rmth for each year of service. 4 3 c , DEATH IN FAMILY 3 days 3 days j CC, i HEALTH INSi1RA1CE TSvti pays for Sanus HMO employee Sanus Plus $30.00/month for i dependent coverage. $100 deductlble/per- son. $1000 maxl" I out-of-pocket ex- pense/person/Year. 90% hospital out- patient, lab. DENTAL $1000 annual Savings of 30 - SOL maximum per person. E { IA1/0109910B/10 +i I 1 1 I ~r f 0*4 BENEFIT TW1 CITY NOTES LIFE INSURANCE $250000 Annual salary LONG TERM 60% of average 60% of regular DISABILITY wage - maxlmum pay after 90 days of S300/week - of total disability maximum of 20 until dge 65. weeks. ACCIDENTAL $25,000 benefit N/A DEATH AND equal to term DISMEMBERMENT life Insurance amount In effect at death. y i t i DEPENDENT LIFE $2000 spouse. N/A $1000 dependent child. I i IA1/01099108/11 i i 1 CITY MOTES BElF I T TWA 75A tuition, books 100% tuition TUITION and fees. and fees. i ASSISTANCE s J it of fixed average 10 years of service RET[REMFNT earnings x total at age 60. rxnber of years 25 years of service at aga 50. of service. Vested a28 t years of service - after 5 years. 28 age loft. 65 years of age or An annuity derived later. from funds accunu- 55 i la Years of age or lated from annual later with 10 years of vested service at deposits of 15% of reduced rate. employees salary over Early retirement at the duration of ` age 55 or later with employment with accu- 30 years service, mulated Interest TWM pays full cost. earnings added. j. I „ 1 , IAl/01099108/12 i, I "1 1 BENEFIT TM CITY NOTES . PROFIT SHARING Based upon company N/A All) SAVINGS profits, employees 4 a PLAN can receive annual contribution tip to 21 of their eligible pay. 100% vested after 3 years of service. Through payroll ICMA Deferred deductions, pre- Compensation tax savings of Retirement Plan. between 11 and 101 of their ellglble pay up to $1000/Year. Matching contribution from company up to 14 $500/Year. , I: I EMPLOYEE STOCK Company makes N/A r OWNERSHIP PLAN annual allocation of stock to each participant's account. 100% vested after 5 years after 12 months of ` service. I i I r IA1/01099108/13 1 I II f BENEFIT TM CITY NOTES SERVICE SNARES Employee given N/A P~'K OPTION Opportunity to j Purchase specific number of shares of stock at a specific price for a specific f length of time. t Based upon 101 of prior year's I; pensionable ' I earnings. Coverage begins after ; years N of service, DIVIDEND Voluntary stock I~ N/A REINVESTMENT purchase plan. i ~ I AID STOCK Company pays all PURCHASE PLAN brokerage fees. c Coverage begins Immediately. i IA1/01099108/14 j i SALE OF COMMERCIAL SYSTEM i r, e y ~C SECTION I I I - Assurptlons for Financial Analysis i Proceeds from Sale of Commerclal r, Landfill Deproclatlon c Scenarios F Decision Trees I 1 f~vr 9 I ` % ■ A KAI l ASSLMPTIONS COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS o Assume they will have free market competition to provide them the best price for their solid waste service, MAIN CONCERNS o Residential rates, and o Local site for solid waste disposal for local Denton citizens and non-residential Denton citizens, such as contractors, etc. FRANCHISE FEE AT 8% o Retain 89 to help pay for landfill costs for Resldentlal's benefit until 1995 - reduce to 6!j 1996 - 41) 1997 - Al and by 1998, credit all of the franchise fee to General Govern - AML Mont. NEW LAMPILL o Assume can expand east, south and north around existing landfill and get an additional 3,5000000 cubic yards of volume I ? at an opening cost not to exceed $3,500,000. Amortize, this I $3,5000000 debt over a seven year life of the landfill at 71 Interest bonds. i MISTING LANDFILL CLOSURE COSTS j i o Set up a $500,000 landfill closure account for the existing i landfill. Do not assume any savings for closure prior to finalization of the latest Subtitle D regulations which and expected to go Into effect in the sum~er of 1992. L"-TERM SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL OPTION Y o Texas Waste Management has assured Denton that they will I provide a 15-year guaranteed Solid Waste Disposal contract, (i subject only to CIA escalation and escalation that may result r r E i from any future additional regulations. Texas Waste Manage- i ment would Include with that proposal the Installation of a . centralized dump site and transfer station. For analysis purposes, the assured guaranteed rate is $3,45 per yard In 1993 and escalates at five percent (5!) per year thereafter. RESIOENTIAL RATES ANO ACCLKILATE0 FUNDS o If under any scensrto the residential rats can drop below $9.95 per cubic yard due to other landfill revenues, etc., the I residential rate was assured to remain constant at $9,95 and any surplus revenues are accumulated, and when other costs escalate to where rates should be increased beyond $9,95, the accumulated surplus funds begin to be depleted, the reslden- ttal rates are gradually Increased so that rate revenue wtll exactly much expenses when the accumulated funds are totetly depleted. I i i 1 7 I ti 14 I J I i ~Rr ! M a i1Mlw~ , } i J PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF COWER.CIAL The $1,900,000 proceeds from the sale of the Commercial system were allocated as follows; j' 1. 5500,000 Is placed into a restricted asset fund to satisfy an accumulated non cash depreciation deficit. It Is assumed that this restricted asset can earn interest at the rate of 8% per year and this amount Is credited back to the landfill as Interest income. 2. $1800000 Is set aside to satisfy any losses in the residential 5 and/or camerclal systems accumulated to date. 3. $40,000 Is set aside to satisfy accrued employee vacation time. 4. The remaining $1,1800000 Is assumed to be invested at 8% per I y~ r year and annually in April, the previous year's Interest plus $1180000 Is credited to the landfill. t' 1 LANDFILL DEPRECIATION The original asset value of the landfill was $1,688,056.83 and was originally set up on a 20 year depreciation schedule. In 1989 the depreciation rate was increased to $208,796.47/year. As of September 30, 1990, the non-depreclated book value of the landfill was $8350185.88 which indicates that by September 30, 19940 the landfill book assets will be totally depreciated. However, depending upon the options selected, this rate of depreciation may be overstated or perhaps ' understated. ~ J t 1 4 F 4 i ~ffI 11 r 1 1 i SCENARIOS r A. Two basic scenarios are: 1. Commercial is sold (CS), and 2. Commarclal Is retained (CR) a. Cortmerclal System loses 2% of its Customer Bass Per Year (CRD). b. The City becomes the exclusive provider of Commercial Service (CRE). I rte' B. Options on basic scenarlos are: 1. Landfill volumes Accelerated (LA) I.e., Denton continues to receive present volumes plus addl- tional Texas Waste Management and other haulers. Volumes are allowed In Denton's landfill up to a maximum of 4400000 cubic yards per year. I 2. Landfill volumes held Constant (LC) } I.e., assure all existing volumes now going into landflll would continue to go to Denton's landfill except volumes would increase in proportion to increases In population. i 3. Landfall volumes Decreased (LO) I I.e., Denton directs Texas Waste Management to take Denton's a. commercial volumes which were 180,000 In 1990, to other disposal sites and Denton's landfill volumes continue to Include Denton's residential volumes (800000 cubic yards In 1990) and contract haulers and cash customers (30,000 cubic yards and 100000 cable yards In 1990). I 4, Landfill volumes Increase (LI) R I.e., Denton becomes the exclusive provider of commercial yards. waste solid deposl d at the landf ll by an estimated 4,126 volume I I t 1, C. Options after present landfill Is full are: 1. Expand existing Landfill (LE) 2. The City would direct haul (OH) the solid waste collected to the DfW Landfill in Lewisville. i k 5 I I t SALE OF COMMERCIAL DECISION TREE EXPAND INCREASE SOLID LANDFILL WASTE VOLUME TO LANDFILL DON'T EXPAND • CS-LA-DH HAUL TO LEWISVILLE I ' EXPAND CS-LC-LE SELL MAINTAIN CURRENT LANDFILL COMMERCIAL SOLID WASTE ' VOLUME AT LANDFILL DON'T EXPAND - CS-LC-DH HAUL TO LEWISVILLE EXPANb CS-LO-TS/LE LANDFILL WASTEAVOLUMEITO LANDFILL DON'T EXPAND - CS-LO-TS/LE HAUL TO LEWISVILLE i4 Qh{~ Y1 iL! *010 NOT APPEAR TO BE A VIABLE OPTION. **THE TWO SCENARIOS INVOLVING THE SALE OF THE COMMERCIAL SYSTEM AND DECREASING THE SOLID WASTE VOLUME AT THE LANDFILL PRODUCE SIMILAR RESULTS AND HAVE BEEN j COMBINED INTO ONE PROFORMA, ; A ~ 1k t r rw- 4 v.~ ( V I P ' SALE OF COMMERCIAL 1 DECISION TREE CITY BECOMES EXCLUSIVE PROVIDER EXPAND LANDFILL CRE-LI-LE EXPAND LANDFILL INCREASE SOLID WASTE VOLUME TO DON'T EXPAND - ' LANDFILL HAUL TO LEWISVILLE RETAIN I COMMERCIAL EXPAND LANDFILL CR-LC-LE MAINTAIN CURRENT ;,)LID WASTE VOLUME AT LANDFILL DON' TTOXLEWDISYILLE CR-LC-OH r 04 UL EXPAND LANDFILL DECREASE SOLID WASTE VOLUME TO DON'T EXPAND - LANDFILL HAUL TO LEWISVILLE x, DECREASE CUSTOMER EXPAND LANDFILL CRD-LC-LE BASE BY 2% PER YEAR **THE SCEI'3AR1OS INVOLVING THE RETENTION OF THE COMMERCIAL SYSTEM AND iNCREAS- ING THE VOLUME TO THE LANDFILL ARE NOT REALLY VIABLE ALTERNATIVES IN THAT WE COULD NOT INSURE INCREASED LANDFILL VOLUMES WITHOUT LOWERING LANDFILL TIP- PING FEES WELL BELOW THE C, THEREFORE, THESE SCENARIOS HAVE ***THE BEEN ELIMINATED FROM SERIOUS CONSIDERATION SCENARIOS INVOLVING THE RETENTION OF THE COMMERCIAL SYSTEM AND DECREAS- ING THE VOLUME OF WASTE AT THE LANDFILL DO NOT APPEAR TO BE VIABLE ALTERNATIVES AS THEY ARE EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE AND REQUIRE SIGNIFICANT RATE 2 AND 199 FOR BOTH COMME THESEINCREASCENARIOSSES IN BEEN3ELIMINATED FROMRSERIOUSOCONSIDERATION, THEREFORE, _44- IAtimnaa m I y ~r i SALE OF COH4Ek^.IAL SYSTEM I Cal SECTION IV - Scenario Al - CS-LA-DH - Narrative, Profonna, Table Scenario 12 - CS-LC-DH - Narrative, Profonna, Table Scenarlo 03 - CS-LC-LE - Narrative, Proforma, Table. Scenario A4 - CSLO-DH LE -Narrative, Profomo, Table 1 Scenario A5 - CRD-LC-LE - Narrative, Profomna, Table h 04 r' Scenario 06 - CR-LC-LE - Narrative, Profonna, Table Scenario NT - CR-LC-DH - Narrative, Profonra, Table Scenario !8 - CRE-LT-LE - Narrative, Profonna, Table r I F y 4 i i a `T^ lpm-~IIQPWPIW+ r ! , j,A Y r h N7 t }}rri _ !3 y, ti SCENARIO f I { . a 1 a A. ~f 1 I 1 r f SCE 01 01rect al Sold, Landfill Volume Accelerated. CS_LA-OH.... Direct Nau1 In this scenario, we assume that the commercial system is sold, the deposition rate at the landfill is accelerated in excess of twice the current volume, and future disposal of residential solid waste 1s hauled to the DFW Landfill In Lewisville. In this scenario, excess revenues are retained to stabilize residential rates in future years to help cover Increased disposal costs. This scenario also assumes that the Texas Dopartment of Health will allow the City of Denton to significantly increase the deposition rates beyond permit limits. " This scenario assumes 24 hour per day, seven day per week operations of the landfill to accommodate a waste stream over twice as high as Is currently received. It Is further assured that a private contract hauler Is capable of bringing these kinds of volumes to the Denton landfill. Payroll has been increased to account for addltional person- nel and overtime. Services has been Increased to reflect additional equipment needs, Increased surcharge, contracting for excavatlon/lining and anticipated Subtitle D requirements, Maintenance and supply costs have been escalated to account for the Increased activity. i. Residential expenses Increase to account for contirwetlon of recycling functions currently performed by Con, rclal Solid Waste. ti COfKRCIAL RATES In this scenario, commercial rates will be dictated by open market competltlon among private collection firms. RESIDENTIAL PATES In this scenario, residential rates are held at current levels ($9.95 to $14.85 Ina thby an e year 2000.e of year beginning 3In Residential rates 5..99 per month) 5 i } T i i 9 IA2/IA1ro10991028/26 V y~. i r+cw. r a LANDFILL RATES In this scenarlo, landfill rates for the City's resldential system are held constant at $3.00 per cubic yard for 1991 and 1992. In 1993, landfill rates Increase to $3.05 (1.6%) per cubic yard. For contract customers, landfill rates increase from $3.00 per cubic yard in 1991 to $3.45 per cubic yard (15%) in 1992. Contract customer rates will remain constant In 1993. TIPPING FEES After the City's landfill closes In 1993, tipping fees for the use of the DFW Landfill are estimated at $2.89 per cubic yard and are assured to escalate at 56 per year for each year thereafter. r: LANDFILL LIFE EXPECTANCY In this scenario, the accelerated deposition rate at the landfill will t^ result in the closure of the City's landfill in September, 1993, rather than the current estimate of July, 1996. k ~ r NET GAIN/(LOSS) In this scenarlo, significant gains occur until the landfill Is full. r Losses occur when direct hauling begins and continue through 2000 and { therefore draw down the accumulated net gains of earlier years. INCOME FOR GENERAL F" In this scenarlo, administrative transfers to the general fund from the con, rclal system (estimated at $67,000) will cease In 1991. Also, administrative transfers to the general fund fram the landfill (estlmaL- ed at $29,000) will cease In 1993. The general fund would also recelve revenues from private hauler license fees totaling $990,000 from fiscal year 1995 through fiscal year 2000. l Y 1 1 i r i x w i CODE: CM - CONK RETAIN 03 - LRIDFUl. DECREASE FILL MIE LE - LANDFILL [MAAN110N DI - C" 30L0 LC - LANDFILL CM011MI Fill RAIL LI - LANOFILI IMCAEAM CRO - 001M111[I4I" DECREAS O LA - LANDFILL ACCELERATE FILL RATE CA[ - COM AEIAIN [CLUSIYE ON - D2RECI HAUL COMIEACIAL OFFION3 1191 1992 1993 1991 1995 1"A 1111 1994 1999 2000 _ X(NAAIO 1 RES RATE 9.93 6►5 0.95 10.11 10.30 11.73 11.00 JIM MIS ILLS CONM RAI[ 211.5! 0 0 0~ C9-LA-DN ANN 21M A 02 Lv11 1.111 15291 11601 12101 (364) lilt) Elul 12 _ 1N1fNg1 0 4r 151 230 Ila 113 tot I CUN Ollll A alt "IS' 3,111 1,110 2.034 1,11 2.FI1 1.1003 gas Ila 1 t,T93 1.016 LIC FEE 0 0 0 0 41 101 ISO 219 271 235 AD INAM9 C ~ 33 0 AO IRAN$ L 29 30 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . r, 1 i I I E ~ I Vr 'I ri m7w t j r RES RATES & CUM NET GAIN = SELL COMM - LANDFILL ACC - DIRECT HAUL 18 3 y I 1 3 15 2.5 W O- U cll] I_ b 13 2 Q w z co) ~Q- f [L 12 1.5 J 14 ~ r~ 'Q l ~ 1 Lu 10 co S .5 1 W 1991 1992 1993 1954 1995 1998 1997 1998 1898 M CS-LA-Do 1 1 3 11:~u:393 Rr S 1146 Nlllt II ~lI WA4I4, 1,INWMNA LLWNENLIAI L"I A-UN ACILAL At(UAL F9 F7 ti F1 ff /t FY Ff EF FF t Scenario 1 lilt 1990 1991 1997 1993 119/ 1195 1996 1997 1991 1999 2000 1 IOI AI ANNUAL CUS IONEAS 174,512 11!.911 176,200 171,702 171,666 101,311 101,11! 190,313 193,117 200,271 205,191 210,162 2 [Ib le rirde Collected 07,03i 19,111 79,414 79,955 10,310 11,771 93,750 15,155 61,015 10,SL3 17,670 97,019 3 Avg Cubic Tds / CU9L 0.50 0.15 0.45 0.13 0.41 0.13 0.45 0.43 0.45 0.15 D.4$ 0.15 6 Avg Nth 1111 I Curt 1.Oe 9.31 9.95 9.97 9.05 10.1! 10.1D 11.35, 17100 12.93 13.9s 11.63 REVENUES 9 Residential Fears 11,501 11,631 1,151 1,164 1,111 1,841 11006 2,160 2,312 2.516 2,116 3.131 6 Reg Soic Sal Pickup 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t 3UBI01AL - CUSI REV 11.561 $1.131 {1,751 $1.164 $1 151 41.041 42,006 17,160 12.3$3 67,591 17.116 93.131 , W Sala or Refuse 0909 41 43 as 16 !0 5/ $1 42 66 72 17 A3 IL License Fees O $4 92 101 115 161 113 LO2 $3 0 0 0 12 Ccaaerclal ANY 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Landfill Rev 0 0 4SO 90S 1,112 11111 0 0 0 0 O 0 ' 11 Sala Awrt 0 0 167 191 119 100 171 162 153 1/5 136 171 IN Uther Int 1169 0 a 20 AO 10 510 0 0 0 0 0 a !6 IOIAL REVS $1,639 11,717 12,560 $3,130 51,714 $1,90B $2,379 $7,106 $2,615 17,110 13.059 Sl.Sll L XVLNOIIIIRES 17 Pavroll 4611 $706 site 4835 SOl) 11,111 11,167 11,225 $1,286 $1.350 11.117 $1.111 1r+:' 11 Suop l in 231 117 232 236 243 961 200 291 303 313 320 341 if Maintenance 157 119 L46 160 161 201 211 221 233 20 257 IN 20 Services 129 19 176 22S 209 145 is$ 265, 1$3 766 t79 293 -00 21 Insurance 76 26 26 27 21 so 40 47 16 46 40 s0 22 fundrv 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 ' 21 bad Debt 7 1 F 7 F 7 1 t 1 1 1 / 24 Ada3n Iruaferb 00 111 213 213 253 263 331 350 364 319 316 610 626 2S Adain lra slaps CC 0 0 41 ID SO $7 S/ 56 SI 6a 62 66 26 Landfill ["Me 196 245. 211 240 936 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 21 lipping Hs 0 a 0 0 0 237 2S1 271 295 311 362 361 6r 21 WIAL EXPENSES $1,606 SIMS 11.122 6 t.0161 12,013 1 Wei ; 11,116 17,193 13,002 13,131 13,309 21 "Et GF OVERAIlON! $21 is ;;5 4631 11.101 11,291 (ISO;) (1210) 1$2601 (1211) 111121 11911 1Jt COW AND SIGN WEN EXPENSES JO Fixed Assets 10 $11 116 120 $7 s2u $10 120 $20 !A $70 410 31 Uabt Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 , 32 Other Expense 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a $3 Net UY Inv It" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F 34 Irlrr in eaklrg Cap a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IF u 0 SS n 0 U D 0 ....U 0 U 4 II II [ 36 101 " WEN kXP 10 112 616 120 tl 421. 120 SID 120 $20 620 170 SI fGl W[R/16.91 OFER UP 11 606 (1,607 61,936 $2.051 12,100 $7,517 $2.639 $1,146 $2.619 0,022 $1.171 $3.01 'I t[l 1.a 1$3111 1191!9 ,la a[ ilq al 219[1. 2s a as 212199 91!!121 eta Ct ull/t 211.91 30 NEI GAIN/ILOS31 st6 1$811 $617 11.061 11.2Me Iss791 (ttbD1 112601 1176/1 117121 111121 ill 39 INIEAESI Al a 1.501 0 67 132 231 716 211 208 203 703 21d 40 CUM ANN NEI GAIN/ILD431 0 0 $122 $1.156 1311% 12,190 $2.636 12.147 112,111 $2.701 $7.715 $3.016 lists, Italia Ask... iraass [[sat 2121.2 n[[1. nerii ull al runt 39119 Pastas 11 PERLENI CHO IN NIN kill 2.57k 6.016 0. ON 0.001 1.011 6.401 5.090 S.F31 F. 927 6.1511 1.121 17 tIPRINII FEE AAIE 2.300 71625 1.156 7.091 3.039 3.111 3.SSO $518 3.06 3.171 NPV a 11.161 f f ' 15:7a:3N `M ~Ml hl lei WLIJ en,r, \1NI LrlbN - 91U 1 OtA.LM1 14A IOW1 C;-LA UN KIUeI a.l UAI TV TV rl. Scenar to l FY IT 9y IV t9 FY IF FY 1111 1990 1991 1997 19q 1191 199! 1116 1197 1191 199f TU1p I TUTA1 ANNUAL CUSIOMERS 11,621 MOOR 6,360 d 0 7 C1LU Yards collected 101.295 379,952 19,626 p 0 G ° -0 p s t AVp Cuble Vde 7 CUSt 13.01 12.99 11.09 0.00 0.00 b. DU O.OU 0,00 O.UO 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 Ara pith Bill I Cu6l RC YE NUE 69,11 100.66 IIS.f! 0.00 O.Do O.ob 0.00 O.Do 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 Cpaaerolal Fe" I1413 11, ]d10 17 SS t0 t0 t0 10 f0 0 Ccae Special Pkw a t0 10 f0 t0 0 0 p 0 0 0 4 0 0 D 0 0 0 a 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 O 0 p 0 G \ ' Il SUBIOIAL - CU97 FEY 11.313 I1,]dL 1133 10 0 to to Ip {0 t0 1C 40 13 0 0 0 13 0 a 0 0 0 0 ° 0 O 0 p 0 16 0 0 O a 0 O 0 0 0 0 Q 0 ' 15 TOTAL REVEMUk9 11,513 41.166 177! "";u "•-10 I t N14 NnI tUIQ f 10 40 30 so to Ip l0 16 Payroll 1121 y 11 Imo!! A'e /1 13!! 47I? 10 !0 f0 40 10 s0 s0 to t0 14 Nalntenams !1S 111 71 0 ° ° 0 0 0 0 0 11 de rvkM 129 69 66 0 0 0 0 a p 0 ° 0 20 lnemaixe p p 70 11 f 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 D PI $UndrV O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p ' 17 Bad /Ad Debt 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 D a 23 Admin Tramfore. 00 17 71 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 CIE' 24 Alain Tr6nefers lc 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 tS tand911! bperw 170 353 261 0 0 0 0 a p 0 0 0 - 0 .ip 91 101AL [%DEN9E3 11,261 {1.551 1611 s0 to $O s0 t0 10 $0 SO to 17 Nil AND OPIR DINER ISO 117 $54 $O 10 t0 to to $O la So so CAPST ANO KIN WEN E%VENSE{i lEn 21 FiAed MSdts to Sll 111 so to t° to 29 Debt Sarrtce D 0 0 0 0 a 0 100 10 100 100 Soo . 1 SO Oti+er [AI>.n►1 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 31 Met On Inv IrAns 0 0 0 p O 32 Inlr in 11or%Io0 Cap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 ' 0 36 101 NON OPLR . 10 111 521 t0 {0 SO 10 {0 10 SO SO t0 ' 3! 101 WER/MLW WFA [AP 11,7!3 11 ]40 1611 {0 1 to !0 10 SO 10 la LO 10 !kept [11.11 2Iii0[ I:fitf Itai! [l:pq tii:It [11.11 11].19 311111 1.11.1 ~ilt[1 I $6 NET 04101,0501 130 36 isi s0 to 10 40 to !0 110 to so *e1 ROORE MAMMA 092492 92[.01 211222 229282 992292 822.43 1132X2 e82e92 2292n atoms 119122 992292 37 PERCENT. CHO IN NIN TILL 11.901 15.02'1 -100.001 0.001 0.001 0.004 0.00% 0.006 O. DOS 0.001 O.D01 ' i f 4 1 r r.. 1 ,f1 1 4 1 r SMNUI ILL P'N MnN wlu Clkln6 le. I Al r IS i looUl ' r~1 l7 ao:7e CS-lA-994 AC IUPI M;I UAI FY FY rf 17 TI 1Y FY FY FY FY Scan4rlo 1 1919 1990 1991 1911 1913 1141 1995 1996 7997 1991 1941 1000 ; i I l CY keg. 41.071 79.111 11.19E 19,735 80,370 0 0 0 0 D D 0 3 C1 Cook. 111,795 179,751 19,616 0 O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 cl Coati $0.151 21.10 71,917 29.11D J1.S34 0 D a 0 0 0 0 1 CY Cwt. 5S,19S 61,648 355,941 671,978 111.003 0 0 U 0 9 0 0 S C1 Oliver 7.191 1. lea 1.196 2.001 2.013 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 6 tot Ann CV $65,071 758,001 556.00U 750.000 794.000 a 0 0 0 0 0 O 1 Cum. CY 1,134.915 I.S00,000 3,056,000 3,106.000 4,600.000 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 Al YENUES 0 Coatra0l tw 171 213 1061 7106 1557 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 Cask Fees 61 19 at 100 lot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l0 Other foot S 6 6 1 1 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Il Ws Teas 196 745 ass 710 246 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 61 Casa roes 170 3!S 269 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l3 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 O 0 0 _ 0 II IN Nlv ••1121 61.109 61.660 I7SS7 87.107 so 10 f0 !n 10 90 1o 15 O 0 a 0 O 0 .....a 0 0 0 O 0 16 107 REV 1171 $1.109 11,666 17,551 17.707 10 to s0 s0 10 so t0 y IAPIND1IURES U RaY roll SJ27 $111 $306 $351 076 to f0 60 $0 s0 10 100 I j 1$ supplies !3 SI 54 S7 54 0 a 0 0 P 0 0 11 wine 135 232 152 169 111 0 Q 0 j 10 services 154 300 636 543 116 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 ' 21 Imurance 1 10 to 10 it 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 turdrY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 is Dad Dept 7 l 1 1 l 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 JI Main iraMHra 00 it 34 79 30 32 0 0 0 0 Q 0 D as Admin 7ramferl, CC D 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 motor Pool Dept 0 0 21 64 $7 0 D 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 15 . w0 cantina ltoenditu ..."o ......0 t0 . 1° 71 Y7t OVER REYENU61 1755 1111 $451 11,313 11.SSa su so 10 t0 s0 to s0 CAP AND WA OP[A ItPENSES ~ 20 Fined A$Nte $0 10 t0 $0 16 t0 t0 LO W 10 LO to 1 19 Dept Service 267 all 202 193 115 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 oMt Service Fund o 0 0 225 175 0 0 0 a 0 0 n I{) JI ML On Inv Tram 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 9 D 0 D 32 !nc In York Cm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 U a 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 TOT WOO OPER t1P 1763 $211 1702 1416 $416 1814 f0 t0 t0 0 t0 10 ` iS TOTAL OPER/NOM CPER _•••111 1.671 •1.211 1,617 1,56% 111 0 D 0 0 0 0 + 1111 of [12228 2-2112 riles frlue 12211, tafa• Hn[f tone ttr tfa afnn muf 36 NET GAIN(LM) ,191 0121 IISO 1905 11.141 IL6141 s0 10 10 t0 10 t0 pull 122[( Zinn 98[122 298111 113,1 if iff 2fl 1p H1 121214 ruin Rent/ tf /121 • 31 IANOM L M1t 2.73 $,011 J.ODO 5.000 3.050 3.050 0.000 0.000 0. no 0.000 0.000 MOM , 4 tall 1 C(AA) Q.000 0.000 D.000 0.000 0.000 39 LANDMI. PAN 1.25 3.100 3.000 1.650 3.450 3.00 0, ON t I ICON.CASN.OtNIAt + I 1~ I I 1 >q r~ i W~l r i - is 4! ~ i.; y N; SCENARIO 2 1 i m i i I I I I I I J i ~11 1 I I J~ '1 ' t r SCENARIO $2 CS-LC-DH.... Cormiercial Sold, Landfill Volume Constant, Direct Haul in this scenarlo, we assume that the commercial system Is sold, the deposition rate at the landfill remains constant and future disposal of solid waste is handled by hauling to the DFW Landfill in Lewisville. In this scenario, we assurre that the purchaser of the City system continues to bring the same volume of waste to the landfill that previously was deposited by the City's cammerciai system. Additional aj landfill expenses would be incurred to accommodate the private haulers' 24 hour, seven day per week operation. Residential expenses Increase to account for the continuation of re- cycling functions currently performed by Commercial Solid Waste. t COMMERCIAL RATES In this scenario, comrercial rates will be dictated by open market competition among private collection firms. i RESIDENTIAL RATES a In this scenario, residential rates are held constant at $9.95 per month through 1995. In 1996, residential rates begin to Increase by an P, average of 8% per year and reach $14.85 by 2000. K LANDFILL RATES } In this scenario, landfill rates for the City's residential system can be held constant at $3.00 per cublc yard in 1991 and 1992. In 1993, landfill rates increase to $3.05 (1.61) per cubic yard and remain constant through 1996. For contract customers, landfill rates will increase from $3.00 per cubic yard In 1991 to $3.45 per cubic yard (151) In 1992. Contract customer rates remain constant through 1996. 1A2/lAl/010991028/28 -53- r+ 3 ~ f T TIPPING FEES 1 After the Clty's landfill closes, tipping fees for the use of the DFW Landfill are estimated at $3.35 per cubic yard and are assumed to escalate at 5% per year each year thereafter. LANDFILL LIFE EXPECTANCy i In this scenario, the constant landfill depositton rate will result in the closure of the City landfill in July, 1996, as originally estimated. NET GAIN/(LOSS) In thls scenario, we would anticipate significant accunulatton of c.. revenues ($1.7 million) through the year 1996. In 1997 through 2000, the system experiences losses which reduce the earlier gains to $1,683,000 by 4000. I INCOME FOR GENERAL F" 1 In this scenario, adnlnistratlve transfers to the general fund from the cam,erclal system (estimated at $670000) will cease in 1991. Also, a, adnlnistrative transfers to the general fund from the landfill (estimat- ed at $490000) will cease in 1997. The general fund would also receive revenues from private hauler license fees totaling $990,000 from fiscal year 1995 through fiscal year 4000. C ww ~ ~ F I 1 q I t w i` ' f 1 1 CODEI M - COINI MIAIX Co CAIN lOl0 l0 - UMFIII OECMAS[ F)tl MIf LIF LAWFUL, IXPANSION to - LAWML CURMwr FILL RATE LI • LAMOFILL INCREASE CRD • CONI MAIN DECREASED LA - LANDFILL ACCELEM1l FILL MIE CM • COM RETAIN EXCLUSIVE ON -DIRECT NAlll COMENCAL OPllc"S 1991 1112 loot 1991 "So 1996 .'11117 1191 1919 1000 Sll MAR 10 1 REI RATE 1.95 1.95 9.95 9.95 7.93 10,75 CUMM HAT[ 9.39 11 D D 11.15 IF,BS MIS 14.15 r 7 CS WUH ANN 0/111 N I/Y i56 200 SSI 705 ! 0 0 UU INI6HI 1 1 0 0 0 1 CUM OWLI R 199 ll it 57 11 106 1611 17611 1116) S S16 ISS 1.177 1.617 177 lTt 119 117 55 LIC Fit 0 0 0 I, 102 L 777 I.SH L.560 1.613 AD TRANS C 0 /1 AD :MANS 1. is D 0 0 0 107 1S9 719 171 713 ' 79 30 ST 31 76 so 0 p 0 0 :t { I f 4 I r ~ SI i. 1i I I, L 1C1. ~L I j 6 olk RES RATES & CUM NET GAIN = SELL COMM - LANDFILL CURRENT - DIRECT HAUL 18 0 ~ 15 1.5 cc W (L 14 c . ~ 13 1 ~ I 0 ' 12 z 10 E C 1991 1992 1993 1894 1995 1998 1897 1998 1999 WW CS-LC-DH . I I 11 I i 1 I I 1~ f 1 ~ 111 13:5/:!1 14711+LhI1ML wArU ewa 11 VryllilmN VII l.LlMIU 1wL r f CS-LC-ON II A bowl (C~~p~•7 R ".censrl0 7 AC I UAL AJIUAL f7 F7 fY FT FM 1v49 1990 1991 1997 togs 1191 1993 19996 v 197991 1190 71 or 7000 1. 1 Cubic 1911 1 ANNUAL CUSiQhEA7 7 Cubic TarA 174,157 173,9{1 176,24a 111,707 11/•668 161,311 315,711 110,313 115,111 700,711 205.198 710,117 ' Collected 17,031 79,114 11,111 19 , 955 60,370 41,119 Is,ISO 1511 ! Ar0 Cubic Mde /Cult 0.13 O.IS 0, 0150 0.15 0.45 45 0.15 15 //,OIS 90,311 91,670 9s. 069 4 b0 hill /111 7 Cent 9.00 9.31 9.98 fns 1,95 9115 0,45 0.13 O.IS 0.18 0,11 REYENUII 1.91 10.13 11.75 17.45 17.11 3 Assidentlal 1614, 11,S11 01.434 1,154 1,164 11.13 1,)78 e0v 6 Res SWciAI Pickup 0 0 a L-800* "41 7.0110 1.713 1,513 1.116 3.151 0 t ° ° 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 ° ° 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 p ° 0 0 p 0 ° 0 SUe IVIAt - CUSI NfY 11. 01 (1,630 6f .1St (1,111 11,170 Il .ec/ 11 ,e/1 17,U16 9 17,193 17,SIJ 11.816 13.1!1 sale of Aefuee o',, 43 45 /e so S4 10 license Flip 0 34 9E el 11 11 77 77 17 i iii lie lee lS 301 a 11 Landfill Rev 0 0 1131 11 Coeaercial Nov 0 0 3? 771 710 19} 13611 U p 0 13 9414 avert 0 p 0 0 O 0 0 I/ Other ant sev 0 0 170 110 110 110 Lit 111 154 143 134 171 10 40 40 540 0 D 0 101AL REVS EXPENDITURES 11,177 11,711 -7,017 37.101 0,300 11,190 17,119 17,109 -2,11S 17,769 13,05. 61,341 + 15 Pa Pavrol rpll 1611 /lee tit/ 1175 11 JICOl in 3171 1971 $167 11.015 11.711 u,3 53 $1,1}1 11,117 17 Naimtersnce 734 141 751 771 715 751 761 771 719 Et! 716 319 Isli 14 Services 171 /19 136 760 164 116 US 194 134 246 Ise 11 Insurance 89 116 175 701 HS 205 715 713 791 !1! 7oil 71 21 700 20 2p 761 710 !00 !1 42 41 46 a$ 13 sundry bt 1 I I 2 I I 71 Ada to 7nn►lus 00 lit 713 743 153 763 171 ]16 13 Adeln transfers CC 0 0 41 713 796 711 394 110 11 21 Landfill Cmerne N6 245 778 340 114 211 75 54 3 14! St 60 62 64 1 21 11DOIn0 FN 0 a 0 0 0 0 76 I 0 0 0 0 19! Sig 812 $69 UTAL EXPENSES Il_606 11.793. 11,917 37,031 17,093 II.tSI 17.154 $2,751 13,011 1!,033 13,103 61,313 1 7) MEt Of OPlMIION! 371 (17U CAP AND WA OPEN EXPLN591 (165 1316 1701 0331 121! /751 -1-1111 .111111 111161 171 we riled Assets 20 112 $11 120 99 Lett service 0 0 0 0 '31 170 120 120 $20 170 1!0 S7p If I~ 30 Other laDense 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° ° O 0 0 ' 11 1l Pat On Inv Crane 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p f 71 Incr to Y°rkl Al Cap 0 ° 0 C 0 is 0 D 1 0 0 0 p 0 a a 0 0 0 0 0 D .y a 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 i 31 101 NUN OPEN 61P 8U 117 111 _ 120 • 11 170 620 170 170 .'-!t9 170 In {f+ JS 107 MAN* OPIR Ile ' + J 34 Fill OA1N/ILOSfI }Ly4i ~649i 1.111.14 121111 131 876 I (356 1200 1511 111 iiiIn Siiin ' 73!11 -119 11D! 1711 wee, 137 661 (11{/1 Is 31 A601 At 7.S 111111 [1191[ Alit![ "all 1 1 a i',all [[1114 611[1611 6111111 [Slat[ 113914 [!lost 1 UM / 0 I 74 CUM ANN NE1 aRi N/I loa) 19 6149 Sub IM $1.123 11,1,7 11,71! 11.722 N DlI1ClMi C110 IN N7M Irlt 2,9N 11- 3 6,11- 0,006 0.0001 0.00- 0,001 1.011 1.103 f. 161 1$lit tl, iii 31,360 81,694 40 LANDFILL RAtt kip 2. no 1.p,000 3,000 3..0 1,050 3.030 1.030 64 7,121 11 IIPPIxo ff[ AA1I 230 2.63 2,16 2J• 8,01 1.11 {+I L SI 1.11 1.69 s.t6 I I f I I I I I I I r1 r I t6 y PAM 04 15:310 Is 1 lUUO7 G-LC-ON 3cenar b. 1 ACTUAL A:IUAL 9v ff ~r FY FY FY FY FY FY FY 190 igloo 1991 1797 1993 1991 1995 1996 1997 6998 1199 1000 1 IUTAL AH"L CUSTOMERS 14,629 15.101 1,360 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 P I Cutlc Yards Collected 191,295 119,251 29.626 0 O a O 0 0 0 0 0 E Ava Cubic Yd6 / Cwt 13.00 11.19 16.09 0.00 0. DO 0.00 0.00 0100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E Ava With 1111 / cuet 19.71 100.46 115.13 0.00 D.oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RIVE RUEI 3 CoeAercl t fee6 11,315 $143!6 1733 s0 t0 10 s0 s0 10 ID $0 10 6 Coe% 30ec111 PAW 0 0 a 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 D 0 a a 0 0 0 a 0 0 s a 0 a 0 0 a D 0 0 a a 0 9 S0110IAL - CUSI REV $1.311 $1,386 173s 10 t0 10 1o $0 so 10 t0 $0 10 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 yl D 0 0 O 0 0 a 0 0 D a 0 I2 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ 11 M AL MAIM $ 111,313 $1.306 Ills 1.0 s0 to 10 ID SU s0 to $U EAPENOIIUREI i 11 Pavroll $421 $376 Iffi9 $0 so s0 10 t0 $0 so to fu is Swil II es /1 SI 11 D 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 16 wlnt6Mrxe 113 liB 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 D 11 services 129 67 66 0 0 0 0 O 0 a 0 u It Insurance 20 l9 9 0 O 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 19 31j"Urv 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 20 bad Debt 6 6 6 0 0 a 0 0 0 a a 0 11 Adam Irenafers 00 at 71 is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a ,f 12 Adeln Iransfeu CC 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 D 0 0 j 23 Landfill [.Dome 630 553 261 a a 0 0 0 0 a 0 D 26 TOM EXPENSES $1.213 11.339 1617 10 to s0 $0 t6 s0 to $0 s0 7S NEW OPEA AEYI $30 161 351 t0 t0 s0 1o $0 t0 10 s0 II CAPII AND OTHER NUN LfEA EXPENSES 26 lived assets so Ill 171 10 s0 t0 $0 so to $0 1D la EI Debt ServWd 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 19 Other EvOenle a 0 0 0 P 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 1 19 Met On Inv tram a 0 0 0 a O 0 0 0 0 0 0 l 30 imer In 11ork3rq Cs0 D 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 P a 0 0 32 101 mm OPEN {0 $1L 121 10 s0 t0 to 10 t0 t0 10 $0 v': 13 IUI IYER/NON UPEN IMP 11,113 $14350 •1690 so ----10 ••__10 SO 10 10 to t0 '••-t0 I' 2.911. ,"so 912.11 81.911 4.111. nanf Iefetx .*list .1.111 !11.11 assn. 211111t 34 WEI 0A1MlILOISI $s0 $36 111 s0 10 1.0 10 IU 10 60 t0 W SEFt7RE IMNSFIR Rki2.1 2..e's u11.t 2ki2A4 122212 221181 1.1218 222.28 skill 111112 222219 2x2218 it PENCENI CHa IN N1H BILL 11.90% 131022 -100.001. O.aDt 0.001 0. on 0.001 0.uot 0.001 0.005 O.Un { 1 i i li i I 1 i I 1 3 ' ~ LANUI III VNVh6kNN N/U IUMNl N.:INI r 17 3 lUW) 1l: S/:51 CS-LO-UN AC IUPL AC IUPI Fr II fr I1 FY fY FY Ft FY fM Scenario 2 1989.. --1190 1991 1992 1995 1994 19,05 1996 L111 1990 1199 2000 j. 1 CV Res. W.031 79.114 19.494 79,955 80.510 11.771 8S,/50 IL IJS Q 0 0 0 2 Ct Cwm. 191,795 171,152 19,626 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 3 CY Cash 50,751 20,804 28,142 79,110 29,354 79,111 30.192 31,751 0 0 0 0 / CY Cont. 53,795 68,641 163,401 251.661 760.653 261,563 77U,931 277,615 0 0 0 0 S CY Idher 2,203 1,916 1,994 1,007 2.023 1,051 2.102 2,551 O 0 0 a 6 lot AM CY 365.07S 550.001 363.165 567,133 372.$40 311.167 301,703 $96,926 0 a 0 0 1 Cum. CY 2,1S4,925 7,500.000 7.963,165 S. 733,198 1.605,119 3,915.941 4,311,230 /.161,156 0 0 0 0 11 YE NUE t 8 Cartnct lees 111 113 490 197 199 111 135 151 O 0 0 0 1 Lash fees it 69 U 100 101 103 105 101 0 a 0 0 10 t1thmr Feu 5 6 6 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 11 Ras $AS$ 196 243 Is$ 210 246 249 75$ 262 0 0 0 0 11 Cwt, Fees 430 $55 261 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 D 0 0 0 0 a 0 b 0 0 0 1 IS 5U6-Kv tall 41,109 11.0 Ya 01.240 $11155 61,717 11, SOS $1,535 $V $0 00 t0 16 0 0 0 a 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 17 701 REV 1173 !7,709 11,090 11,240 $1,753 11.212 $1,303 01,335 t0 $0 SO $0 LAI'LNCI IUN31 11 Payroll $223 1711 $306 ISS9 tl 24 $396 $470 4446 t0 10 10 10 19 tipolles 13 54 41 37 11 30 4a 43 a 0 0 0 20 Nalnt 135 252 143 146 159 Ill all 114 0 0 0 0 31 services 3S4 308 $41 175 Flo 1$0 lot 113 0 0 0 0 22 Insurance 9 10 10 10 11 32 12 1$ 0 0 0 0 1J Sundry 0 0 0 0 b 0 b a 0 0 0 0 74 /6d Debt 1 l 3 1 t 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 25 Admin Iramefsrs 21, 34 71 30 37 14 36 58 0 0 0 0 I.A 26 Aden Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 Motor Pool Debt 0 0 20 64 52 5 0 O 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LCeratim Elmend $$As $910 feel $423 $954 $804 $051 1908 10 10 $0 10 1 29 MEf CPLA REVENUE Vs$ site 6129 C4P AND W" CPER EXPENSES 1117 1299 $161 1452 1121 $0 t0 /0 $0 'r 50 Fled assets 60 10 $0 6a $6 $!s $20 $20 t0 10 $0 s0 31 Debt service 963 711 202 113 115 129 164 140 311 0 0 0 , 31 Debt service Pun 0 0 0 10 30 30 50 SO 50 0 0 0 1 31 NI On 3nv Trans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 hK In Aurk led a a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 C ......0 0 0 0 0 36 101 0011 OVER 191A 1713 $211 $702 $243 1241 $144 1234 $230 9711 !0 90 $0 JI TOTAL CPEA/WM 0 /2e 1.171 1,11J 1,064 I,i9S 3.Q/1 1,019 1.131 741 0 0 0 RAISIN 831212 tutu 3.1122 ellltl 211129 alkali sarue rates utdrt ttuet arlatl 31 NET 0AIR/IL0111 (89) MIT (U3) 1174 131 1224 6211 1111 (t)ill $o to 60 .31,13 nt..r 1212.1 11sts$ male 114222 INal2a alnal 3IRA12 uRAal )ewe 222212 f It tVVILL RATE 2.75 3.098 3.000 J.000 3.050 1.050 7.030 3.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 b.oW UEf 6 C'"I 4U LANDFILL RAZE 1.76 JADO 1.000 3.450 3,4S0 1.450 3.450 1.650 0.000 0.0W 0,000 0.000 i. (CAM.CCN I RAC I,OIIIER I ttI e h-,- ~mrer ~a I a r y SCENARIO 3 ! R I IppII 7 i I i P 1 1 i / ;y SCENARIO N3 CS-LC-LE.... Com+ercial Sold. Landfill Volume Constant. Landfill Expansion In this scenario, we assume that the co,m~ercial system Is sold, the deposition rate at the landfill remains constant and future disposal of solid waste Is handled through landfill expansion. In this scenario, excess revenues are accumulated In 1992 through 1997 and are retained to stabilize residential rates In future years to help cover Increased disposal costs. In this scenario, we assume that the purchase of the City system contin- ues to bring the same volume of waste to the landfill that previously was deposited by the City's commerclal system. Additional landfill expenses would be Incurred to accormodate the private haulers' 24 hour, seven day per weak operation. Residential expenses increase to account for the continuation of re- cycling functions currently performed by Commercial Solid Waate. C014WRCIAL RATES In this scenario, camTercial rates will be dictated by open market competition among private collection firms. RESIDENTIAL RATES x In this scenario, residential rates can be held constant at $9.95 through 1996. In 19970 residential rates will Increase to $10.75 or month (8.09) and will remain constant through the year 2000. LANDFILL RATES In this scenario, landfill rates for the City's residential system can be held constant at $3.00 par cubic yard In 1991 and 19921 In 1993, It will be necessary to raise these rates to $3.45 per cubic yard (159) and hold them constant through the year 20001 For contract customers, landfill rates will Increase from $3.00 per cubic yard to $3.45 per cubic yard (15%) In 1992, In the period 1993 through 2000, these rates will escalate at an average of 41329 per year. x, F t -60- 1AMA1 /ninOQlMWIM I ~ rf E ; TIPPIEES Not applicable. i LANDFILL LIFE EXPECTANCY I In this scenario, the constant landfill deposition rate will result In the existing portion of the landfill being full In July, 1996) however, the landfill expansion will closure beyond the year 2000. result In additional space which delays NET GAOSS) In this ,;cenarlo, we would anticipate significant accumulation of revenues ($3.1 million) through the year 2000. iNCCME FOR GENERAL FUND In this scenario, administrative transfers to the general fund from th J CO"Wrclal system will cease in 1991. Adnlnlrattva e i general fund from the landfill will nuesth oug transfers Co the I expanded landfill. The general fund Oh tha ven of the I ues private hauler license fees totaling $990,000 also from fiscal year from through fiscal year 2000, year 19gs b ((be~y ypy1. f i. 1 -bl- lA?/!AI/010991028/31 1 ~I t I CODE CR - COMM RETAIN LO - LANDFILL DECREASE FILL RATE LE - LANOF11l EXPANSION CS - COMM Solo LC - LANDFILL CURRENT FILL RATE 1.1 - LANDFILL INCREASE, CRD - COMM, RETAIN DECREASED LA - LANDFILL ACCELERATE FILL RATE ON - DIRECT MAUI CRE - CONK RETAIN EXCLUSIVE COMMERCIAL OPTION! I 1991 1992 1993 1994 1,795 1996 1997 1996 1999 2000 G_ SCENARIO 3 RE! RATE 9.95 9.95 9.95 9.93 9.95 9.9S 10.15 11.75 11.95 11.95 COM RATE 11S.SS 0 0 0 0 0 0 CS-LC-LE ANN 0/1L) R 149 356 251 417 370 316 94 (2) 29 22 INTEREST O 11 39 60 96 131 165 114 195 ail . CUN 0/(L) R 149 $16 $06 1,253 1,750 2397 2.456 2436 2.165 3.101 i. SIC FEE 0 0 D 0 41 102 IS9 219 222 235 AD TRANS C 31 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AD TRANS L 29 30 32 34 36 31 40 43 44 49 , I 3 , r rJ ~ r RES RATES & CUM NET GAIN = SELL COMM - LANDFILL CURRENT - LANDFILL EXPAND 3 12.5 12 2.5 1 f W ! d 11.5 2 c i ~ 11 1.S E 10.5 Z ca j, 10 f ` 3 •5 a W 9.5 cl I 0 i 91 a a 1991 1992 1993 1984 1995 1996 1997 1998 1899 2000 . CS-LC-LE A 4 z 1 I t REStDENIIAL SOLID WASTE PROFORMA - 11/O COMMERCIAL 11t21t11 1/ K 1000) CS-LC-LE Scenario 3 ACTUAL ACTUAL FY FV FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY 1909 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 lf95 1996 1991 1998 1999 2000 1 IUTAL ANNUAL CUSTOMERS 114,552 175,914 116.210 111,301 1181661 1/3,316 !15,11/ 190.343 195,117 200.271 205.496 110,862 2 Cubic Yards Collected 81,031 79,114 19,494 19,955 80,SIO 81,119 63.750 65.835 88,015 90,313 :2,610 95,089 S Avg cubic Vds / Oust 0.50 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.4% 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.41 0.45 4 Avq Mth bill I Cust 9.08 9.31 9.95 9.95 9.95 9.95 9.95 9.95 lolls 11-IS 11.95 11.95 REVENUES $ Residential fees 11,584 11,631 1,154 1.164 1,111 1,x104 1,118 1.191 2.098 2,353 2,45b 2,520 6 Pea SOaclei Plckur. 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 i B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 SUB101AL - CUSI REV 11,584 11.638 $1.754 11,161 11,178 $1,804 $1,818 111891 12,098 St.S53 12.456 12.520 to sale of Refuel legs 48 43 45 48 50 54 57 62 66 72 77 83 1 It license lee 0 36 92 184 18S 111 145 102 S3 0 0 0 j 12 tudfill Itarsier 0 0 (23) 114 141 362 416 463 (305) 50 97 147 13 Coaserelal kev 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C, 14 Sale Asort 0 0 142 198 189 180 111 162 1$3 145 136 127 15 (.'lhel lilt. P!v. 0 0 20 40 40 40 40 40 $40 0 0 0 IOIAL REVS 11.632 81,111 12,081 82,401 12,583 12,621 12,611 12,123 12,606 82.619 12,145 12,816 WIND) 101% k 16 P6Yroll 1688 1188 1196 /83S 1111 1921 1961 11.015 11.066 11,119 11.115 61,234 i 11 Su0pll9s 134 161 232 236 215. 235 265 276 217 298 310 322 1 11 MaSnte, me 155 161 136 160 168 116 115 191 204 214 225 236 19 Services 129 It 116 215 209 193 205 213 126 231 249 261 20 Insurux:e 26 26 26 27 21 29 30 31 32 33 34 311 21 Sundry 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Bad Debt 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 8 8 6 1 93 Ads1n transfers 00 111 283 243 233 263 214 213 296 301 320 333 346 24 Adatn Transfers CC 0 0 41 41 SO $2 54 56 36 60 62 64 /S LArdfIII FXPelse 196 24S 238 240 aft 282 'x19 294 304 312 320 321 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 26 IUTAL EXPENSES 11,604 11.193 11,922 12.031 12,125 12,191 12,281 $2.381 11,492 12,601 92016 $2.134 NEI OF OPERATIONS 124 lilt) 1145 1316 1251 11431 1390 1336 W4 W 149 142 CAP AND "CON OPER EXPENSES 21 fixed Asset$ 10 112 316 620 It $20 110 120 120 120 120 620 11 Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 29 Other Experts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 30 let (1n Inv Irene 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 Inca Ill Moti,intl Cap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 32 33 IUI NON UPEk EXP 10 112 116 120 61 120 120 120 120 120 620 110 34 101 UPER/MOO OPEA EXP 11,604 11,105 11,938 11.051 62,132 St all 12,301 62,401 12,512 02,621 12,136 12.154 ! Sete;; au;e■ afeeee tn;te i;;eee leett■ ;eena I'Me all toe tote;; tea tie site;; SS NEI GAIN/IL09!) 126 1118) 1149 i154 !t!1 (112 1310 1316 194 (12) 1]9 $2t asaau uute tome *$as;$ aeesas emu issue touu assets saatot eaten Into 36 1"ItFiEII AT X 1.509 0 11 39 60 96 131 165 111 196 115 16 CUM ANN NEI GAIN/IIDSSI 4149 IS14 6806 111181 11,150 12,191 12,456 12,631 12,165 13,101 31 PERCINI ('110 111 MIN TAIL ?.Silk 6.871 U.uOlk 0. on 0.00% 0.00% D.OUlk /,O/t 9. in 2.101 0. on IV ---VFW F % r. " aras'sw~ 1 i COMMERCIAL SOLID WASTE PROFORMA - 010 COMMERCIAL 11:21:11 (s X 10001 CS-LC-t9 Scenario 3 ACTUAL ACTUAL FV FY FY FE FY FY FY FY FY FY 1989 1990 1991 1997 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1199 2000 . • S TOTAL ANNUAL CUSTOMERS 14.629 13 107 6,360 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 Cubic Yards Collected 191,295 119,252 09.426 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Avq Cubic Yd: I Cwt 13.01 11.99 14.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 Avq Nth 0111 / Cust $9.18 100.44 115.55 D.OU O.Ou 0.00 0.00 O.OU O.UD 0.00 O.UO 0.01 10 VENUES 1 Commercial fees $1,313 11.316 $135 SO 10 SO so $0 s0 to t0 t0 1 Loam Special PNup 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 SUBIOIAL - C031 REV 11,313 $1.316 sf35 SO SO s0 50 s0 t0 s0 SO t0 is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ; 19 TOTAL REVENUES $1,313 111316 $135 10 $0 t0 s0 to t0 t0 s0 $0 EXPENDITURES 20 PAvro11 $421 1316 $209 SO t0 10 50 t0 f0 30 10 $0 21 Suoolles 48 51 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 Maintenance ITS 111 i1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 Services 129 69 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 Insurance 70 19 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Sung rV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 24 Bad Debt 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Admin transfers DD 41 11 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 Admin lrans9srs CC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 29 Landfill Expense 430 $55 269 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 30 IOIAL EXPENSES 111213 51.331 $611 SO s0 $0 10 10 SO $0 s0 $0 31 Nil OPER REPS .$30 141 $51 s0 $0 $0 $0 t0 s0 SO 10 to CAPI1 AND DINER NO4 OPEN EXPENSES 32 fixed Assets $0 S11 $21 t0 $0 s0 $0 $0 SO SO $0 s0 33 Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 Other Emonss 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3S Rat Fun InV trans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 Incr in 11orNinq Coo a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 . . j - 38 ID1 NUN MR 10 111 sit s0 10 $0 $0 t0 t0 10 t0 t0 k .49 IVI Ill-1111141H MI R EXP 11.213 111350 1691 s0 $0 10 •SO $0 $0 to s0 s0 street alsars A1141 112212 14akal laolas alkali alttat Angola asassa *stags 213231 411 MI 4AIN/I1o/11 $30 136 SO t0 t0 SO s0 50 10 $0 10 $0 ` OEFOME IRANSFER 211211:1 142182 Ragtag Rostov stoats assala lasaRa • Ragtag sargag tatass ttlala 13111tt 41 PERCENT LNG IN M1H BILL 11.991 15.02% •100.0Dt 0.001 0.001 0.00% 0.00% O.LW% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% I h LANDFILL PROf01UlA - M!0 CONNEACIAI llttlsll it X 1000) rV CS-IC-L[ ACTUAL ACTUAL FY FY FY FY FY Try FY FY FY FV Scenario 1119 1990 1911 1992 1993 1994 1115 1996 1997 1996 1999 2000 1 Cy keg. 81,031 19,116 79,4--4 79,955 80,510 11,179 63,150 65,1335 81.015 90,513 92.670 95.0890 2 CY Cosa. 1911295 119,252 19,626 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 3 Cf Cash 30,151, 28,804 21,942 29,110 29,334 29,114 30,492 31,251 32,045 32,161 331139 34,620 4 CY Coin. SI MS 61,811 163,401 251,661 260,653 264,563 210,939 211,685 211,731 292,110 299,196 $07,620 S CO (N.her 2,203 1,966 1,996 2.00) 2,023 2,053 2,102 2,1s$ 2.109 2,261 2,326 2,311 6 lot Ann CV 365,075 351,004 363,465 369,133 3126560 371,169 391,213 396,926 407,008 111,631 428,531 431,116 1 Cue. CY 2,134,9ri 2,500,00 2,163.465 3,233,193 3,605,119 3,903,941 4,311,230 4,768,156 5,115,164 6,S92,19S 6,011,32! 6,461,042 Al VENVF S U CcntracL lees 121 213 410 892 944 1006 1002 1164 1254 list 3455 1568 9 Cash Fees 69 119 17 100 106 It$ 122 131 141 1S1 164 116 ' 10 Olher Fees 5 6 4 7 1 1 1 9 10 l0 11 12 It Res Fees 196 24S is$ 240 271 202 289 296 304 312 320 326 12 Come Fees 430 555 269 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 )3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 .....p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i ~ 11113 Pro 1021 81,109 11,090 $1,240 $1,336 $1,110 $1,501 $1,601 $1.108 61,025 11,950 12,085 , 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 1 H 101 ExPfN IIUREV 1821 $1.109 11109G $1,240 $1,336 11,110 11,501 11,601 $1,701 11.015 $1,950 62.05 17 payroll 1223 $271 $306 $359 $376 096 1420 $446 1400 M11, IS55 091 It Sumiles 23 51 41 $1 41 38 40 43 46 49 S2 56 It plaint 135 232 143 144, ISI 149 ill 194 209 22S 212 260 } 20 Services 154 308 341 115 210 ISO 1H 113 166 200 its 232 21 Insurance 9 10 l0 10 11 12 it 13 14 1s 16 11 22 Sundry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 fled Debt 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1[ 24 Adain Transfers 21 34 29 30 31 34 36 30 40 43 44 41 2S Adeln Transfers 0 0 0 o C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'; t 26 NotOr Pool Debt 0 - 0 21 64 51 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • ..$123 6954 $Boa Iasi • $116 11,049 • Cotlattr+o Eapeu 6546 $910 $911 81,121 11,712 M t 21 NEI CPER REVENU NSS $199 $111 $41) 6382 $606 $650 $691 5132 1176 1823 $613 P C01I4 AND NON C1PER EXPENSES 1 III Fi)wf Assets to 60 $0 so 66 $15 $20 120 $20 $20 $20 120 29 Debt Service 263 211 202 193 Is$ 179 164 160 161 656 636 6$6 30 Otbl Service fu 0 0 0 SO SO SO s0 SO SO SO s0 SO ' ~11 1Mt On Inv Iran U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r i; 11v it, Yn1h I'm, U 0 D 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 1171 IMF C1'LI1 EX 1263 6211 6702 $243 $341 1244 6234 $230 61,037 $724 1176 6724 S9 M AL WIR1104 119 11121 1,113 1,066 1,193 1,041 1,015 1,131 1,013 I'm 1.653 1,931 seanr a2121s assist sut21 211328 stalls Raises Bettis assets Islas* suite Mass 36 Ntl VAIN/(1031) (Ill ($52) (123) 1111 1141 1362 1416 1463 (1305) ISO 1ST 1141 Nestle allies 121221 211109 12e131 estate arises t11tft lassos 092Je3 Dana totals 41 IANUFIII RA II 2.25 3.098 3,0"0 3.000 3,450 3./50 3.150 3.150 1.450 3.44SO 3.450 1.150 IPf4 A hrMl 1 t SCENARIO 4 t. ~ i f 9f 9 i I ~ ~L SCENARIO 04 CS-LD-DH/LE.... Commercial Sold, Landfill Volume Decreased, Direct Haul/Landfill Expansion In this scenario, com, rcial Is sold and the landfill volumes decrease. City commercial volume is taken elsewhere and we lose 908 of contract volume and 508 of cash volume. For future disposal, the scenario applies to either direct haul or landfill expansion because the life of the existing landfill Is extended beyond 2000. MftRCIAL RATES In this scenario, commercial rates will be determined by competltlon am&V private haulers. RESIDENTIAL RATES In this scenario, residential rates Increase to $10.95 (108) in 1992, increase to $11.95 (9.18) In 1993, remain constant in 1994 and 1995, Increase to $12.35 (3.38) In 1996, Increase to $12.95 (4.88) in 1997, increase to $13.50 (4.28) In 1998, Increase to $14.00 (3.78) in 1999, and remain at $14.00 through 2000. LANDFILL RATES All landfill rates for residential, comiercial and contract customers will Increase to $3.45 per cubic yard (158) In 1992. These rates will escalate at 58 per year for each year through the year 2000. F TIPPING FEES Not applicable. t . LANDFILL LIFE EXPECTANCY The landfill lasts until January 2001. E t 1 r 11 l lAlk 9 • ~Y ` NET GAIN/(LOSS) In this scenario, the system experiences slight losses in 1991 ($14,000) and 1992 ($160000) but begins to produce net income In 1993 through the year 2000. By the end of year 2000, the system will have generated a cumulative net galn of $932,000. INCOME FOR GENERAL FUND In this scenario, administrative transfers to the general fund from t;;e comnerclal system (estimated at $70;000) will cease In 1991. Adnlnls- tratlve transfers to the general fund from the landfill will continue through the life of the landfill. The general fund would also receive revenues from private haulers' license fees totaling $990,000 from 1999 through 2000. i i i j G 0 r IA2/IA1/010991028/40 -68- 1V J ~~~yyyyyy~~~~ 01*4 1 j j CODE: CA - COMM RETAIN LD - LANDFILL DECREASE FILL RATE LE - LANDFILL EXPANSION CB _ COMM BOLD LC - LANDFILL CURRENT FILL RATE LI - LANDFILL INCREASE CID COMM RETAIN DECREASED LA - LANDFILL ACCELERATE Fitt RATE ON - DIRECT MAUI 0 CAE - COMM RETAIN EXCLUSIVE COMMERCIAL OPTIONS 1 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1991 199B 1999 2D(j0 ii 0% i. _T SCEHAHl0 4 RES RATE 9.95 10.95 11.95 11.95 11,95 12.35 11.95 13.50 14.00 14.00 COMM RA IE 115.55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CS-LO-DH/LE ANN O/(L) R 1141 (16) 21 15S 6S 38 58 79 46 341 INTEREST 0 0 0 0 11 11 21 27 35 41 CUM OJ11.) R (141 (30) (31 152 228 204 363 469 $50 932 LIC FEE 0 0 0 0 48 102 159 219 221 235 AD TRANS C 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AD IRAHS L 29 30 32 34 36 38 40 43 46 49 1 i k 1 a ~1.4 W MMAJS-.4- aw. . 1 Y E i RES RATES & CUM NET GAIN = SELL COMM - LANDFILL DECREASE - HAUL OR EXP D.9 15 2 8 ' 14 .7 CL .6 ?y 13 5 W 12 co) J 11 2 _ r 10 , 1 W $ -.1 w 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1988 1999 2000 CS-LD-DH/LE l AV galw , 7 RESIDENILXSM)MASIE PROFO""A ' wit) COIBIERCIAt 1fr~9QrPB C}-LO-ONlIE ACTUAL ACTUAL FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY Scensrlo / 1495 1991 1995 1996 1997 1991 1999 2000 1989 1990 1991 1992 L lU1pl ANNUAL CU910NER9 111,557 115.944 116,260 117.307 116.668 161.346 165,110 590.313 195.111 200.211 205.490 710.067 ,179 63,150 65.635 tl8.015 90.313 92,610 95.019 Yards Collected 87,031 19,114 19,496 19,955 60,510 61 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 J M AL ! Ctb 5 0..45 0.4S 0.45 0.15 0.4S 0.45 y_ 9.31 9.95 10.95 11.95 11.9$ 11.95 12.35 12.95 I3.SO 14.00 14.00 Cubie Yds I Cvst 0.50 0 45 0 4 AvQ Nth tlill 1 Cust REVENUES 11.SS4 11.636 1.154 1,941 2.153 2.1611 2.1190 2.5501 2.5280 7,100 2.671 0 2.9 0 S pasidentiai Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 6 Res 90ec1al Pickup 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 { Y 12 SU8t01Rt - CU31 REV 11.514 11.636 11.754 11,941 S2.15S 12.167 12.219 $2,351 .566 !7.102 12.62, .2.985 16 SO S4 SI 62 S3 0 0 0 10 Self of Reftse Bags 48 43 4S 0 0 0 0 36 92 104 160 160 ll0 100 0 I1 ttcame Fee 0 0 37 0 127 12 Coat Rev 0 0 (160) (3131 13991 41111 (162) (1531 11451 1136) (Skit I3 tandlill Rev 0 0 162 198 109 110 40 40 40 49 40 40 510 14 Sale Atort 0 0 90 40 40 _ IS Other lnt Rev I fT.441 .2.511 !7.661 (1.040 (2.949 !3.591 OTaI REVS 13.637 l1, 111 11.950 !7.090 $2.201 12.421 736 $245 1 755 1265 11 276 $1.099 (1.154 51,212 310 15,275 ISO EXPENUIIURES 211 296 225 322 1. 16 Payroll 1601 6760 1624 $862 231 161 232 116 IDS 194 204 214 236 17 Supo)tes 211 I6 Nainlenanca 119 589 156 160 225 166 209 its 20S 21S 237 233 2 34 35 L9 Services 21 21 26, ti 10 29 30 31 0 0 0 D 20 insurance 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 1 6 25 sundry 1 0 J 7 7 1 7 0 SS3 316 7 512 3 61 22 fled n Debt trans 1 7 11 283 243 251 710 252 2 S4 2 56 558 360 23 Adam fers DO 0 0 41 Ill 450 48S 24 Adsin Irarofers CC 196 2/S 238 216 292 sit 334 .360 560 - 1 2S tandtill Eaoense $2.2.49 12,365 - _ IUIRL EXPENSES $1.406 $1.113 11.946 12_091 .2_167 -1.2.363 12.463 1t--- $599 -2 566 ...361 26 REI (I CxERAIIONS 126 4416) _ _-$2 14 034 1115 $SS $50 CAP AND R)N OPER EXPENSES 60 112 116 120 61 170 $20 170 $200 6200 1700 1200 21 fixed fsseb 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 1 28 lrbt Serriu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 Other EW4fte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 Pet tin Inv Irons 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $2 Inrr in tlorH.lrq Cep 37 ~ SO 112 116 $20 .7 $20 420 $20 $20 $20 Sto 120 1V1 NUN um ESP 964 52.114 $2.114 $2,269 $2 , 393 I2,SOS $2.629 12,741 ( $1 , 61:1!6 tiiata tr itas azsaas ■aatat ttataa etaale aaaue taaaaa afaaia tia aft $4 tOF CPER/44044 UPER ESP $1.606 $I.MS 605 2,903 $S,0 179 446 $341 $]6 150 1 $26 (sell ($141 (516) !17 fISS $65 ::zs bS NET OAFN/116991 zz:a21 sz:t3S z/l z:=zzs :ezasz s::z:e a1:2:2 :zzazz a::-tz 2-318 eszzi7 21 0 11 1363 $169 3510 $932 0 0 0 (5141 (630) 113) 6152 1226 $214 4 36 um ANSI At 6 7.501 0 31 t IERCEMI CHO INIMINLBILL 0 2.S7t 6.87% 10.05$ 9.131 0.00% 0.00% 3.35% 4.161 .25$ 5.101 0.00$ i NDY t $436 . w+ 1 I Ii 1 ~J 1 r( r~ 1 VIE s ' i i Ii-Jan-90 COMMERCIAL 90(.10 YAStE ~ @ *a ltr11118 B 10001 PROfOR11A - Y/000f8IEACIAL i' CS-LO-0M/LE Scenario 4 ACTUAL ACTUAL FT FT FY Fy FY FY 1989 1990 1991 1992 1995 199 991 FY FT FT FT 1999 95 1999 96 1197 1990 1999 2°pa 1 M AL ANNUAL CUSTOMERS 11,629 13,007 6.360 0 . 2 Cubic Yards Collected 191,793 119.751 89.626 0 0 ° ° ° ! Avp Cubic Yde ! Cuet 13.08 17.99 I4.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 ° 0 0 0 O.DO 0.00 4 Ava Mth Bill / cult 19.18 100.46 115.55 0,00 0 0 IOVENVES 0.00 O.OU 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 S Ceeeercial Fees $1,313 $1.386 $175 tU 10 6 Ccw Soeelal Pkup 0 0 0 0 110 110 (o $0 110 $0 110 9 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 9 SUBTOTAL - CUST REV 11,313 $1.386 $735 l0 f0 $0 s0 f0 $0 f0 to f0 f0 0 0 a 0 0 it 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a ° 0 JS IOIAL REVENUE! ' 11,31! $1 S86 ____.O .___.O 5135 t0 $O t0 Ut'fNDIiUAE$ so so to to so so l/ Payroll 1429 $316 $209 to 15 Sucolies 18 $8 f0 i0 $0 110 110 16 Maintenance 175 11a 78 a 0 0 0 0 ° $0 110 (0 p 11 8 Ierviceee 119 69 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 tsur 0 a 19 Sundry 70 109 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° i 20 Bad Debt 6 6 It 0 0 p a ° 0 0 21 Adsin Transfer* GG 41 78 33 0 a 0 0 0 ° 0 0 22 Adsin frarrolers cc 0 0 0 ° ° 0 0 0 0 23 Landfill E>,pense a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 130 769 0 0 0 0 0 r1 IUTAL EXPENSE! -$0 $1.783 $1,339 $611 $0 110 - 30 $0 so to so to r 25 NEI OPER kEV4 $30 1111 $58 $0 $0 so ----$0 CAPI I A140 DINER HM OKA EXPENSES 110 f0 f0 f0 to $0 26 Fi XOJ Assets 21 Debt service ttl $!1 $71 110 110 tU $0 10 30 0 0 0 0 a a 0 so so to 71 Other fapense tl 0 0 O 0 a ° 0 0 0 0 29 Ast On Inv hero 0 0 O 0 0 ° ° 0 0 0 0 SO Jncn in Wonklrw n.ep a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 31 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 S2 lui NUN Lipik so alt s21 stl to to to so so to to to UPI 16110,-11111 4.1111 EXI' $1.783 $1,350 $690 su to so - -to xe::a: sass .::xs: z::::z 110 0 $0 $U $0 to NEI GAIN/ILOS9) ::a-_ sx::a .:aa 1-1.113 22-28 ::aa: a:::2x zz RIFORE fRANSIEN :acres .981111:1 :azta■ x:z:ztl zs::aa z:zsta u z:ax:x rss:,° f0 to $0 3S I,EkCENI CITO IN off" BILL 11.9011 15.024 -100.001 0.004 0.001 :a zz s: 0.00$ 0.0" 0.00% O.D011 O.00 .OOt o. m s LA140FILL PROFOAMA - N/0 Ct MEACIAL 1t•Jan-90 19 X 10007 11:14:te CS-LO-OH/tt ACIUAL ACIUAL FV FY FV FV FV FY FY FY FY FY Scensrlo 4 1919 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 7000 1 CV Res. 11,031 19,114 19,494 I 79,955 80,510 91.179 83,150 65,635 88.015 90.313 92.670 95.089 2 CY Cori. 191,795 119,152 19,476 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Cf Cash 50,151 29,804 21,942 79,110 79,334 29,114 30,492 311251 32.043 32.661 33,139 $4,420 5I 4 Ct Cmt. S3,79S 68,641 69.119 69,560 10.115 11,161 12,662 14,691 76,594 78,594 60,645 62,150 1 S CY Other 21203 1,986 1,996 2,001 2,023 2.055 2.107 2.155 2.209 2.261 2.624 2,317 4 lot Ann CY 365,075 356.004 269,236 180,652 182,043 184,173 189,274 193,938 196364 204,055 209,360 214,843 1 Cue. CY 2.134.925 2.S00.000 2.169,136 2.949.886 3,131.9S1 3.316.704 3,505,930 3.699.869 5.898.133 4.102,761 4,512.161 4,527,013 AIVENUES 1 Contract Fees 121 213 209 740 254 771 791 313 331 US 391 422 9 Cash Fees 69 89 87 100 106 113 122 131 tat 1S2 164 116 I 10 Other Fees S 6 6 1 7 1 1 9 10 10 11 12 11 Ref Fees 196 245 238 276 292 311 334 $60 388 419 450 485 12 Cuss Fees 430 SSS 269 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 . 15 SUB-REv $821 11,109 $608 $623 1659 1703 1756 1813 $876 9943 $1.016 !1.095 j, I If. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 101 REY $821 !1.109 $808 1623 $659 $103 $756 $813 $876 $943 $1,016 $1,695 ~.v 1XV10110RE! 18 Payroll $223 $271 1119 1231 1215 $260 1180 1301 1323 1516 1311 $403 I t9 Supplies 73 54 41 35 46 38 41 43 46 49 53 56 20 "Mint 135 237 13a 146 154 164 177 190 204 270 236 234 21 Services 154 308 294 115, 210 150 161 113 lab 200 215 232 72 Insurance 9 10 10 10 11 12 12 13 114 15 14 17 23 Sundry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 24 Bed Debt I 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 25 Adaln Iransfers 00 21 34 29 30 32 34 36 36 40 43 46 49 26 Adsln lramfers CC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 21 Motor Pool Debt 0 0 28 -__-.64 51 -.-_--3 0 0 0 0 0 0 weratlna Exoendlt S$66 $910 $166 $693 $817 1664 11107 list lets face $942 Mali 28 NEI OPER REVENUES 1255 $199 $42 Il101 (1158) $39 149 $54 161 167 $14 $03 CAP AND mm OPER EXPENSES 29 Fixed Assets $0 $0 so s0 $6 $Is $20 $20 $20 $20 $20 120 30 Debt service 263 211 202 193 113 119 164 1110 144 111 115 524 31 Debt Service Furl a O 0 30 SO 50 $0 SO 50 SO s0 s0 32 Pat On Inv trans 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 33 Inc In WorX Cap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - a 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 b U 0 0 D 0 O 15 701 HOH oPtR EXP 1243 $211 1202 1243 1241 $244 6234 1230 $214 $181 ..-$2SS..1394 $6 101AL OPER/NUN opt 129 1.121 966 936 11051 901 o41 919 1.029 1.065 1.197 1.406 rata :::tat T 113 :33228 -38310 2:9133 2t2a31 sassti ::af to :ttz is :31133 1St Y.t 37 NEI OAIH/IL(SS) 1$ai 1!121 1$1607 ($313) (1399) 162051 (11151 16116) 111531 (61201 111111 113111 tttt21 1-Litt attics lassos 2:3291 301033 tticst za3223 Glatt ttttat tolls atat91 is IM01,111. RAIE 2.2S 5.098 3.000 3.450 3.623 3.604 3.994 4,193 4.403 4.623 4.854 5.091 j IRIS 9 COW .19 IANOFIII PAIE 7.25 3.100 1.000 3.430 3.623 31901 3.974 4.193 4.403 1.62S 1.654 5.091 1 1 1I~ I 1 w1 9 r 5 d r SCENARIO 5 n F 1 ~ P i ■ SCENARIO M5 CRD-LC-LE...Camnrcl_a_1oi_ Retained. 2% Decrease Irt Customer Basu Landfill Vume Constant Landflil Expanded In this scenario, the co rerclal system is not sold, the landfill volume remains constant and the landfill Is expanded In the future. This P scenario also assumes that the comnerclal system loses 2% of Its customer base per year. Due to this loss, the commercial system will begin to lose money in 1996 and will need to be subsidized by the Residential system. i CCMMERCIAL RATES In this scenario, commercial rates escalates at 3.5% per year through 1997. Rates increases of 58 will be required in 1998, 1999, and 2000. RESIDENTIAL RATES In this scenario residential rates will Increase to $10.25 (3.02!) in 1992; $10.75 (4.880 In 1993; $11.00 (2.330 in 1994; $11.50 (4.55$) In 1995; $12.50 (8.7%) In 19961 $13.25 (6.008) In 1997; $13.75 (3.77!) In 19981 $14.25 (3.648) In 19991 and, $15.50 (8.770 in 2000. t LANDFILL RATES In this scenario landfiil rates for the City's Residential and Cormerclai system are held constant at $3.00 per cubic yard in 1992; Increased slightly to $3.05 per cubic yard in 1993 through 1996; and then escalate to $3.75 (238) per cubic yard In 1997, and $4.50 (20$) per cubic yard in 1998. These rates then remain constant through the year 2000. For contract and cash customers the landfill rates will Increase to $3.25 (8.3%) per cubic yard In 1992 and to $3.45 (6.2!) par cubic yard in 1993. These rates will remain constant through :996. In 1997 these rates will increase by 37.7% to $4.75 per cubl;; yard t,nd will remain constant through the year 2000. TIPPING FEES Not applicable. -74- mp, r r 1 LMbFILL 70LIFEE XPEC7ANCy 1 The Current landfill will be full In Jul beyond theayea ndf 2000. l l l expansion hhlch y 1996, however will provide ' this scenario MLGAfN/_5) disposal capacity After exPerlencl begins to generate a smell loss In 1992 in this exile goner In modest amount of net scenario 1491-1999 however are the InC01rn through 19961,e system operat1C FOion R In the year 1992 through 2000 ?000 wi th a Cumulative system net pa Losses befn of a break even 583, 000 from G ENE. _ RA~Fft IR this f aconario, all exist! wl11 continue as Is Tharnlstrative transfers aPproxrmately $248,0Q0 from Che general to period 1995 through Private hautersf~ will also receive the the year ?000, license fees durrnge r 1 1 1 lie 1 lYlk'~Y~ la's R~ fI] 1 1 1 M1 CODE: CA - CORN REt11IN LO - LANDFILL DECREASE FILL RATE LE - LANDFILL EXPANSION C3 - COHN SOLD LC - LANDFILL CUM HT FILL RATE LI - LANDFILL INCREASE CAD - COHN RETAIN DECREASED LA - LANDFILL ACCELERAIE FILL RAIE OH - OIAECT HAUL CRE - CO781 RETAIN EXCLUSIVE COMMERCIAL op IIONS 1 1991 1992 1993 1991 1995 1996 1997 1991 1999 2000 SCENARIO 5 RE9 RAZE 5 • 10.25 10.75 11.00 11.50 12.50 13.25 13.15 11.25 15.50 -9 COMM RASE W,.55 119.59 123.1E 126.11 132.59 137.23 U 2.01 119.11 156.59 164.42 CRO-LC-LE ANN O11L) R 120 1211 l0 ES 49 113 1231 1191 tl14 6 I INIEAEST CUM 0/1L1 R 12 111 370 1160 lly 326 2L! 156 56 $E LIC FEE 0 0 AD TRANS C 67 70 73 71 82 Be 94 100 106 l13 ! AD IRANS L 29 30 32 34 36 36 40 13 L6 l9 j ttj t l k. ~ i- i i r c h (jr , ayw+w A r i.w:ga~ i RES RATES & CUM NET GAIN = COMM RETAIN DECREASE - LANDFILL CURRENT - LANDFILL EXP 17 0 .3 I 18 W 15 .25 CL 14 •2 ~W 13 .15 r` E . O f 12 .1 co) a 11 0 .U5 j W 10 9 j 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1998 1997 1998 1999 2000_. . CRD-LC-LE h l . 1 1 I6 A kL4-IUW II ML 4VLIU I.H. Ii. I IA it QN1H 4111 VU4 uW 10` 11:43: X 1000) j ! 1tD-LC-LE r1 ScL arlo 1 5 ACTUAL ACTUAL iY FY FY FY FY IT FY FY fY FY 3989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1991 1998 1999 2000 1101AL ANNUAL CUSIOMER3 174,552 175.911 116.280 671.302 1?6,666 I11,l16 185,116 190.343 195,111 200.211 205,196 110.661 2 Cubic Yards Collected 67,031 79.114 79.494 19,953 19,514 61.119 83.150 65,/35 64.015, 90.313 92,670 95,019 3 Ava Cubic Vds / CUSt 2.50 0.45 0,65 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45, 0.43 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 4 Ava Mth Bill / Cust 9.06 9.31 9195 30.25 10.75 II.OD 11.50 12.50 IS.25 11.15 14.75 15.50 REVENUES 5 Residential Fees 11.584 11.636 ti, 54 61,817 $1,921 81.995 $2.136 62.579 $2,S16 $2.?54 .2.978 f1,266 6 net Special pickup 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1. 9 SUB101AL - CU31 REY 11.564 31.633 $1,154 11.617 SI,921 11,995 12.136 $2.379 $2,596 62,751 $1,923 $3,268 10 Sale of Refuse Bern 48 43 45 48 So 54 57 62 66 72 77 13 It Coca. Rev, 0 0 14 is 139 el 9 1111 (111) (322) (3:3) (4201 12 landfill I1ev 0 0 24 as (21) 73 53 1 (02) 49 MI 116) 14 101AL REVS 11.632 $11681 11.89? $1,978 $2,089 12,208 12,2$5 $2.431 $2,397 $2,552 12,610 $2.907 ~ IXPEHUIIURE- 15 payroll 1600 $766 $761 6799 $139 $258 025 $911 $1.020 290 $1'3071 02 $1, 3125 31 $1 321 11 Nainlnlenlnce ISS 119 152 IS9 161 ITS 184 193 203 213 221 235, i 16 Maintenance 18 Services lit 89 167 207 190 lit 115 194 204 214 225 236 19 Insurance 26 26 26 21 26 29 $0 16 32 33 34 35 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 20 Sundry ; Cr 21 Bad Debt 2 7 I 1 1 7 1 6 1 8 8 / 22 Adsin transfers GO 111 233 243 253 263 214 285 296 308 320 $33 346 23 Adein Irsrolers CC 0 0 47 46 50 $1 S4 56 56 40 62 64 24 Landlill tsperae 196 245 230 240 246 249 255 2.2 _--330 406 411 452 25, IU1nl EXPENSES 11,606 11,793 11.069 11,971 $7,031 12,102 .7.291 17.289 $2,153 12.621 $2 12.142 12.684 j 26 NE1 OF OPERATIONS $26 01127 $21 s0 161 6106 $61 $142 (156) (S?5) ($107) $23 } CAP ANU NON C"K EXpk NSE 71 Filed Assets ' $0 $12 Its 620 1? 120 Ito t20 $to $20 $20 120 26 Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 29 Other Expense 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 Met Cr. 1rn tram 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E 31 Incrlin " kina CAD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 32 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 tol 101 CPER EKP so $12 $16 $20 $1 $20 $20 $20 Ito $20 920 $20 34 101 UP 6 Hurt UP EXP 11.606 61,105 $1.835 $1,991 $2.045 $2.122 62,214 12,309 12.173 $2,64? $2,162 $2.904 2it91s ssrxax :1-922 11t12s s21i2■ 121222 s2122s 121221 221122 t12t12 902219 312221 35 NET GAIN/(LOSS) _.,124 AIM 4 ~ ~ ~ }n ee 7411 122 41147 (1951 (11221 13 l .1 c:l2 'AM) 1.1W e1: 4 cs ::-191 cc::22 :::sxa 11x.[2 12:2ts 36 INIEAESI At X 7.50% 0 l 0 3 1 13 23 19 11 6 3? CUM ANN NEI GAIN/MOSS) $12 117) 131 $176 1176 $311 $259 $163 Us $33 So PF14CENI CHU IN MIH Bill 21516 6.016 3.026 4.68% 2.331 4155% 8.101 6.00% 3.11% 3.6x1 1.7?% I E _ r:cc, Lyiina A.,nl ~.LI w..lR U. v,JW "HOW .,..K eV 11:11:53 r""k x 1000) LC lE acersrfo 1 5 ACTUAL AC,URI fT FY FY FY 1Y fY FY fT FY FY 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1991 1998 1999 2000 1 IOIAL ANNUAL CUSTOMERS 14,629 15.802 12,770 12,466 12.216 11,912 11.733 11,498 11,266 11,043 10.122 10,605 2 Cubic Yards Collected 191,295 179,252 112,030 118,390 114,822 111.326 161,899 164,541 161,150 IS8,015 154.86S 1$1.161 3 AvH Cubic Yds / Gust 13.08 1239 14.31 14.31 14.31 14.31 16.31 14.31 14.31 14.31 14.31 14.31 4 Nth Bill / Cult 19.71 100.46 11S.SS 119159 123.71 126.11 132.59 131.23 142.04 149.14 15639 161.12 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 U 0 REVENUES 1 Commercial fees $1,313 $1.386 $1,110 $1.491 11.512 S1.S34 SI,SS6 $1.518 $1.600 11,641 11.695 $1.144 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 11 SUBIOIAL - COST REV $1.313 11.386 11.410 11.491 61,512 31.S34 $1.556 11.578 11.600 11,647 11.695 $1,744 36 18 48 411 49 13 3 1 0 O 0 12 license foe 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 111 14 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 LL; I 15 IOIAL REYFNUES 11.313 61.422 SI.tl1 $1,539 81,560 $1.583 $1.568 !1,581 $1,601 !1.647 01,695 $1,114 i 69 EXVENDIIURE1 yll 16 Payroll $428 1376 1410 1441 1467 $417 $534 $514 $6111 $66t 1781 793 I7 Supplies 41 18 luintenance k7S 178 156 165 171 185 199 244 230 241 267 211 19 Service0 129 69 136 130 11 11 84 91 91 105 its 121 20 Insurance 20 19 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 28 30 32 3 21 Sundry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 22 Bad Debt 6 At 6 6 6 6 6 1 1 1 1 1 23 Adein Ira sters 00 41 78 67 70 73 If 82 as 94 100 106 113 24 Main Iransters CC 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 25 tendtill Expense 430 SSS 546 $35 $33 523 _--$12 --.S02 605 ..-711 697 721 + 26 IOIAL EXPENSES 11-263 $1.339 $1_403 11.424 11.406 $1.462 81.509 11.ST2 $1-733 $1.915 $2022 12.144 21 NEI OPER REV$ $30 163 $3t$ 1115 1154 $121 $59 19 (9152) (12981 (1327) 16400) CAP AND NON OPEA EXPENSE 26 fixed Assets f0 !li 141 $90 114 $34 $50 120 122 $24 $26 128 29 Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 Other Expense O 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 Rat On Inv Trans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 i 32 Incr in Vo4Ninn Cap a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O j 33 O 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 $20 .__!22 ..-$24 $26 __.12b , 1 34 101 NON OPER EKP -'•-$0 ---611 -$41 ---$90 -615 ---134 35 101 OPER/NOH OPER EXP 11,283 11.350 11.444 11,$14 $1,421 111.196 $1.559 $1,592 $1.175 11,969 12,046 $2,172 t-2222 1112 228112 41:222 211121 222222 233122 2-2381 199221 222122 222222 r81ti~ 36 IOLI ORIH/110951 430 !11 111 125 1139 187 19 (611) ($114) ($$22) (13531 (1428) 9::131 1-:tat -2tt 4:3:22 :81itl 239132 2:2222 --2221 s9ttta 299112 twits 1:2291 1 31 KACEN7 CHU IN M H BILL 11.901 .15.021 3.50! 3.30% 3.50% 3.50% S.Sa% 3.50% 5.008 5.001 S.00% . i f 1 -1 - - 14F LANUFILL 110AUMA - SIAIUS 2aR1 OA4 IS % 1000) 11:41:53 CRO-LC-LE ACTUAL ACTUAL FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY Scenario S 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1991 1991 1999 2000 - 1 CY Res. 87,031 19,114 19.494 19.955 10,510 81,719 63,150 65.835 88.015 90.313 91.670 95,069 2 CY Cosa. 191,295 179,151 182.030 118,390 114,822 111,316 161.899 164,541 161.250 156,025 154,865 151,767 3 CY Cash 30,751 26.604 16.942 29.110 29,334 29,111 30.492 31.2S4 32,045 31,841 33,739 34,620 yl 4 CV Cont. 53.795 66,848 69.17a 69.560 M i(5 711167 72.112 14,691 16,594 18.994 80,645 82.150 S CY Other 21203 1.966 1.996 2.007 2,023 1,053 2,102 2,155 2,109 2,267 2,326 2,301 ' 6 lot CY 365,015 SSa.004 361.640 SS1.041 356,665 356.099 351,125 3$6,419 360,114 362,060 364,245 366,613 7 Cum. CY 213492S 1500000 2661640 3220682 3517547 3933646 4190771 4449250 $009365 $371445 5735690 6102303 RFVLMUES 1 Contract Fees 121 213 208 226 242 246 251 258 364 313 383 393 9 Cash Fees 69 69 87 95 lot 103 105 loll 152 156 160 164 10 Other Fees 5 6 6 7 1 1 7 1 10 11 11 61 II Aes fees 196 249 234 240 246 249 25S 262 $30 406 411 4S2 It coma teas 430 $53 S44 636 $33 523 $it 502 605 711 691 121 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 - - - - SU6101AL-NEYS 1811 $1,109 $1.085 S1.1P2 $1,129 $1.12F !1,131 11.13f $1,467 $1.656 $1,668 $1,741 14 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i5 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 107 AEV $621 111.109 11.085 11,102 $1.129 111,127 81,131 $1,131 $1.461 $1.658 81,668 11,141 E WEN01 F URES 11 Payroll 1223 1211 1267 1281 $298 $311 1341 $366 6394 1424 1456 9491 16 SANVIies 23 $4 47 31 48 31 41 44 47 50 55 56 19 plaint 135 232 131 141 154 164 111 190 203 220 231 2SS 20 Services 154 308 $22 Its 270 ISO 141 113 IN 200 215 232 21 Ins 9 10 10 10 11 12 12 13 14 1S L6 17 1 It Sundry 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Bad Debt 1 1 l 1 2 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 24 Main transfers 00 21 34 29 30 37 34 36 38 40 43 46 49 25 Admtn Iransfers CC 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 26 Estnl tF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 . 27 TOTAL EIIP -..1566 0910 $814 $676 1114 $715 $161 1625 fool 1953 11.014 61,101 26 NEI OPEA REVENUES 1755 $199 $271 1426 1315 1412 6562 1312 11571 1705 1644 6640 CAP AND NOR OPER 0KN5E 29 fixed Assets 60 $0 80 60 $6 $15 $0 16 60 $0 t0 so 30 Debt Serv 26S ?It 202 193 115 119 164 160 656 656 656 656 31 Debt 1. Fd 0 0 0 300 100 1DO 100 100 0 0 0 0 32 Pat On Inv Irons 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 Inc 3n Work Can 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 34 Uebt Atm 0 0 4S 4S 45 4S 4S 4S 0 0 0 a 35 101 MON OPER EIP $263 1211 $247 Me 1336 11339 11309 $sit 6656 1656 11656 6656 36 101 ONERINUN OPER (XP 120 1,121 1.061 11014 1,150 1.054 1.078 1,136 I,S43 1,609 1,610 I,7S1 .:ex es assa2 20:01111 2x-002 Ite22t .aW a states -1x:91 stale* 121202 1-3192 992110 31 NEI 4AlMMOS3) (11) 4111) 124 $68 ($211 673 1SS 11 (612) $49 {112) (116) a2. 22I x21■ :fizz. -99222 229912 2292:6 392211 222192 :testa glass* 222222 911922 36 1ANDFILt RI 1.250 •3.096 3.000 3.000 3,050 3.050 3.050 $.050 3.150 4,500 4.500 4.750 39 (ANOFILL RI) 2.250 3.100 3.000 3.250 3.450 3.450 3.450 3.450 41750 4.750 4.150 4 J 50 { ICONI,CASM,UI) i r' rioFw~ i 1' k rt ~ ' A T l4 t ask SCENARIO 6 ~ Y ~r A SCENARIO 46 CR-LC-LE.... Comnercial Retained, Landfill Volans Constant, Landfill Expanded In this scenario, we assure that the commercial system is reta.'ned, landfill volume remains constant and the landfill Is expanded in the future. COMMERCIAL RATES In this scenario, comnerclal rates escalate at 3.51 per year until 1998 When they increase by 56 for 1998 and 1994 and back dawn to 3.51 in the year 2000. Excess camiercial and landfill revenues subsidize residen- tial rates. RESIDENTIAL RATES In this scenario, residential rates increase to $10.25 (31) in 1992, and remains constant through 1995. In 1996, the rate goes to $10.45 (1.91 Increase), to $11.75 (6.81 Increase) in 1997, and to $11.95 (1.71 Increase) In 1998. The rate remains constant in 1999 and increases to $12.35 (3.31 Increase) In 2000. 1 1 LANDFILL RATES 1F a F, Landfill rates are constant through 1992 at $3.00 per cubic yard. In 1993, they increase to $3.05 (1.61 increase) for residential and ca... r- ' cial, and remain constant through 1996. In 1997, rates Increase to $3.55 (16.41 Increase), and increase to $4.50 (26.71 Increase) in 1948 s and remain constant through 2000. In 19930 the rate for cash and p contract customers goes to $3.45 (151) and remains constant through 1996. In 19970 cash and contract rates Increase to $4.75 (37.61) and renaln constant through 2000. TIPPING FEES Not applicable. j ~ lA2/IAl/010991028/35 J 1 '1 i LANDFILL LIFE EXPECT~y The landfill is full In July, 1996, and Is expanded to acccmnodate waste beyond the year 2000. r NET GAIN/(L055) _ P In this scenario, we would anticipate slight accunulatlons of revenues totaling $174,000 through the year 2000. INCOME FOR GENERAL FUND i In this scenarlo, all exists general fund will continue as is. The geneiraltfund wlllaaiso reto thee ceive mately $248,000 from the private haulers' license fees during the period 1995 through the year 2000, pproxi- i •k , (tF s 3 i I IA2/IAI/010991028/36 t 1. 1 Y CODE: CR - COMM RETAIN LO - LANDFILL DECREASE FILL RATE LE - LANDFILL EXPAHSION C8 - OOMM SOLD 1.C - LANDFILL CURRENT FILL RATE LI - LANDFILL INCREASE CAD - COW RETAIN DECREASED LA - LANDFILL ACCELERATE FILL WE ON - DIRECT HAUL CRE - COIW RETAIN EKLUSIVE CO191ERCI4L OPT10N9 ' 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 KLNAAIO 6 RES RATE 9.95 10.25 10.25 10.25 10.2$ 10.45 21.75 11.95 11.95 12.35 r CCIW RATE 115.5S 119.59 123.78 126.11 132.39 137.23 142.04 149.14 156.59 162.08 CR-LC-LE ANN 0/11. 1 R It (81 34 16 (3) 1 181 9 1151 10 INTEREST 0 1 0 3 9 9 10 10 12 11 CUM 0/(LI R It 5 39 lib 124 134 136 156 152 176 tic FEE 0 0 0 0 13 26 41 54 56 S8 AD TRANS C 61 70 73 17 82 88 94 100 106 113 AO TRANS L 29 30 32 34 36 38 40 43 44 49 1 r q` i : I I 1 i -a- 71 1 i■6¢ r 044 RES RATES & CUM NET GAIN y = COMM RETAIN - LANDFILL CURRENT - LANDFILL EXPAND Z 13 0 .15 12.5 W 12 r (L 193 14.5 .4 r ~W 11 z cf) 7 w ~ 10.5 05 - Q 40 W 9.5 cl) 9 0 w 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 19.99 2000 CR-LC-LE . i i i i i a t IItSIDLNII" Xu1 lu W"'IL 1'110*11A - iolui %W 14:It:31 Ck II tY tY FY FY FY FY fY EY Ocendllo 6 ACIUAL ACIUAL FM tY 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1991 1998 1999 2000 I;.302 10.668 61.340 .118 90,343 95.111 ,2;i .498 10.962 2 CaElc YrrdslEOllectedS 114 179,114 11t.494 119,755 150,510 181,719 183,750 163.655 168,015 290.313 292.670 295,089 3 Ava Cubic Yds / Cust 9O.So 0.45 0.41S 0.45 .00 9.31 9.411 10.25 10.75 10.25 10.25 10.45 11.15 11.95 11.95 12.55 1 Avu Nlfi 6111 / Cusl kivENUE! 5 RoSidentl at FM $1,564 (1,638 (1,151 fl,eto 11,650 (1.6710 f1 ,9 U{0 11.4180 (2,7903 112,390! (1,6506 12.6 0 6 PCs Special Plato 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 111 9 sudl0lRl - CUSI PLY 1I.3I4 $1,638 $1,154 $1.611 $1.831 ,aS9 11.901 (1,969 11,793 $2.593 12.156 (2.60{ ! 62 66 72 77 0S 10 Sale of Refuse Baas 46 43 45 4a SO S{ 3T 11 Co". Rev, 0 0 14 48 190 120 135 103 90 1581 (121 4 22 Landfill ker, 0 0 24 77 7 Ilb 11 0 5 B0 1 1 0 31 24 0 .._22 0 6 _._190 13 O 0 0 0 0 ° 14 IOIAL REY! 111,632 (1,681 $1.191 $1.990 $2,079 $2.190 12,211 $2.310 12.441 12.656 $2.767 $2.890 E6PENDITUREI 1080 1760 $761 (1419 {1141 fBBI $91S $911 S1.020 11.071 $1,125 11.101 15 Pavr011 238 266 2S8 268 279 290 302 $14 sit 16 Supplies 234 161 229 167 IFS 184 193 203 213 224 23S li Nalntenanca 156 189 122 159 129 89 167 201 190 176 181 194 204 211 223 236 10 Services 77 26 29 30 31 32 $3 34 35 01 19 Insurance 26 26 26 p 0 0 0 y~ 20 Sundry 1 0 0 0 ° f 0 a e a e 1 21 bad Debt 1 1 I 7 T 22 Ada En Iranaterl 00 1710 280 1~1 24a 230 252 2S4 254 3$6 560 562 364 23 Adoin Iranstere Dc 24 LaindfIII Expense 194 24S 238 240 - 246 -`-249 7SS ---262 ___312 106 417 120 2f lO1AL EXPEklE! 11.606 Slogs $1,849 $1.976 $7.018 $2_102 $2_191 $2-219 12_455 $2'621 $2:112 $2_060 _ j 26 NEI OF OPERATIONS $26 (113127 S7B 1112 141 $96 $17 121 $l2 179 f5 130 II CAP AND NON OPER EXPENSE ti Fixed M6ets f0 $l2 116 $200 101 f2a 1200 $200 $200 11290 $100 120 !0 Debt Service 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 29 OtMr Fwperoe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p O 0 0, 30 Rat On Inv IraM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o 0 0 0 ° a a o It Inc1 in tbrkina Cap 52 33 IUI SAAR (PLR EKP to $12 $16 $20 17 $20 L_ $20 120 $20 -•.120 -.-120 ..-120 34, 101 OP 6 NON OP EXV 11,606 61.805 It.60S $1.991 $2.045 $2,122 12,214 $2.309 12.41,S 62.641 12.162 $2.880 9129:: t::aaa _::faa aa:f:: aal::a a:S..i eta iza 2932:2 aa:::i a:lafa 9.29.1 8::923 37 Nit GRIN/ILOB81 $26 (11241 112 till $34 116 1131 __c-n -Ea(111 aaa to r_61%) :r$to 221 :::a:a ::aasa a::sai 38 INIEREII Al a 7.50% 0 1 0 S 9 9 10 10 12 1S It cue ANN NEI GAIN/11037) 112 $5 $39 Ill! $124 SIN $06 1156 $152 1114 M 40 PERCENT M IN fit" Bill 2.171 6.4x1% 11 5.021 0...00% 0.00% 0.0011. 1.951 12.44% 1.70% 0.00% 3356 J 14:11:35 Ass* is X I u001 CR .-1E ACTUAL ACIUAL Iy TV fy t. FI IV Fy Iy F9 I1 Scenario 6 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1991 1998 1999 2000 1 TOTAL ANNUAL CUSTOMERS 14.629 15,802 12,120 12.761 12.855 12.954 13,118 13.465 11,801 L4.ISl 14,521 14,900 JJ~ 2 Cubic Words Collected 191.293 119,252 162,030 182,904 163,965 185,382 188.162 191.691 191.495 202.511 201,197 213,221 7 3 Avg Cubic yds / Cust 13.08 12.99 14.31 14.31 14.31 14.31 14.31 14.31 11.31 14.31 14.31 14.31 4 Nth jo111 / Cust 19.78 100.46 115.55 119.59 123.18 120.11 132.59 L31.23 141.04 149.14 156.59 162.06 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R1vENUEs I Coeserclel Fees 11,111 $1,386 51.410 51,S28 $1,591 $1.660 S1,14S $1,848 11,91.0 9:.110 $2,214 11.415 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 O ----0 -----D -----o ---°a ----a ----O -----0 -----0 ----O ---'o ll bU0102AL - CUSI My $1.313 11.166 $1.410 $1,526 $1,591 61,660 $1.143 $1,848 $1,960 $2,110 $2,214 12,415 1 It License Fee a 36 46 48 48 49 11 3 1 r) 0 0 1S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 TOTAL NE9ENUES 11,313 11.422 $1,511 61,576 61339 51009 61,1$6 $1,851 11.961 $2.'11 $2.214 12.415 EXPENOI7URE$ 16 Payroll 6426 $316 $416 9441 3461 $497 1534 1574 1611 1664 1115 $769 11 Supplies 48 56 SS $1 60 63 61 12 11 82 al 93 16 Maintenance ITS 176 156 165 114 leS 199 214 230 246 162 261 19 Services 129 69 136 130 11 86 64 91 91 LOS 113 lit 20 insurance 20 i9 19 2C 21 22 23 25 26 28 30 32 21 Sundry 0 0 0 If 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 22 Bad Debt 4 4 6 a 6 6 6 1 1 1 7 7 23 Adjoin transfers 00 41 11 61 10 13 71 82 as 94 100 106 Lis 24 Adjoin Ira:sfers CC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 25 Landfill C "nse 430 $55 $46 $49 $61 565 514 see 701 fit 935 959 26 TOTAL EXPENSES $1,263 $1,339 $1,103 51,436 $1,134 S1,S05 U.S7l $1.658 11,849 62,145 12,260 $2,3/3 21 NEI OPER MY$ 130 683 6113 s136 1205 $204 $165 6193 1112 (134) s14 652 i CAP AM NOM OPER EXPENSE 1 26 Fixed Assets $0 slt $41 $90 $1S $34 950 $20 $22 924 926 $28 29 Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 Other f w onse 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 31 Rot On Inv Trans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 Incr in Yorkinq Cap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 j ` fr 34 101 NON 0611% EXP $0 $11 641 190 615 $34 $50 620 122 $24 $26 $21 35 101 OPER/N0N OPER EXP $1,263 11,350 61.44, $1,526 $1,449 81,S39 $1,621 $1.641 11.611 $2.149 12,216 $2,411 assess axzazz asst: t::za asst zx etz: as uza:a ~asa:a matt:: a:a :tats ezz:a 36 NLI GAIN/MOSS) $30 tit $>4 149 6190 $170 $is$ 1113 190 ($S6) (612) $4 21211: cease aaua attar atzax t: rzx testa :tsars z:zut z:aaa ::.as 32 PENCENI C1q IN III" Illl 11.90% Won 3.501 3.501 5.50% 3.50% 3.501 3. Sort $.00% $.00% 3301 ~ i 1 r MAI i LAMk 14L rrty Un Mel - 4I NIUS I6As (6 K 10001 11:11:35 CR-LC-11; ACTUAL AL IUAL FY FY FY FY Fr IV FV FY FV fY Scenario 6 1969 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1991 1996 1999 2000 1 CY Res. 67,011 191114 79,494 79,955 60,570 611119 63,150 65,635 ee,o{s 90,313 921610 95,069 2 CV Coax. {91,295 1111252 162,040 162,904 165,965 165,382 186,162 192,697 197,495 202,511 201,797 213,221 3 CV Cash 30,751 28,604 26,942 29,110 29,334 29,174 30,492 S1,2S1 32,045 32,681 33,739 34,610 4 CV Cant, $3,195 66,648 691176 MUD 70,145 71,161 72,662 14,691 15,694 78,594 80,645 62,150 5 CY Other 21203 1.986 1,996 2,007 2,023 2,053 2,102 21155 2.209 2,761 2,326 2,381 6 Tot CV 345.015 $58,004 361,640 363,551 366,008 310,155 317,389 366,635 396,359 406,566 411,111 428,066 1 Cum. CV 2.134.92S 2,500,000 2,861,640 3,225.196 3,511,204 3,961.359 4,338.746 4,125,383 3,121,742 5,576,308 5,945,466 6,373,5S1 RI VENUES 4 Contract Fees 121 213 208 209 242 246 251 258 364 $13 303 393 9 Cash Fe" 6! 69 87 61 101 103 Jos 106 157 156 I60 164 ' 10 Other fees 5 6 6 6 1 1 1 7 10 11 11 11 It As$ Fm 196 24S 238 240 246 249 2SS 262 312 406 417 428 12 Comm Fees 430 555 S46 549 561 565 $14 see 101 921 935 $59 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ; 14 SU6T01AL-REVS 1821 $1.109 1{,083 11,091 $1,151 $1,110 $1,193 61,277 $1,540 51,856 $1,906 61.956 IS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Jul RIV $021 $1,109 81,065 $8,091 $1.151 $1,110 $1.193 81,222 61,540 $1,058 61.906 61,956 69PENOITURES I 18 Pevroll 1223 $711 $261 $201 $298 $317 $344 SS66 $394 6424 $454 1491 19 SuDoIies 23 54 41 31 48 31 41 44 41 50 53 56 20 maint 135 232 138 141 164 164 1l1 190 205 220 2!7 755 I 2L Services 154 308 312 111, 210 150 161 173 186 200 it$ 212 22 3AS 9 10 10 10 11 12 12 13 14 15 16 17 I 23 Sundry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 Bad Debt I l 1 1 1 1 1 I l 1 1 I :5 Admin transfers OO 21 34 29 30 32 34 36 36 40 43 44 49 26 Akin Transfers CC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Eutni IF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 28 IOIAL EKP $566 $910 $814 $676 1614 $713 8161 1625 $Sol 1953 $1.024 81,101 29 NEI OPEN REVENUES SASS 8199 6271 1415 8343 6455 8424 $391 $653 6905 $082 8655 CAP AN Nfal OPEN EKPENSE I 30 Find Assets 60 80 10 $0 $6 $lS $0 $6 SO 60 t0 $0 31 Oebt Serv 263 211 202 113 lei 1,79 164 160 6S6 $56 6s6 656 J2 Land Closure Fund 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 O 0 0 0 33 Not On Inv Irons O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 Inc in Mors Cap 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3S Oabt Retirement 0 0 ____.4S - _ 4S __-^.45 _,___0 __...45 45 0 0 0 0 36 101 IION OPEN IKP $263 $211 3241 1338 $334 $539 $309 $311 1656 $656 6654 6656 + .__i... 31 101 EPkk/N0H OPER (61 829 1,121 1,061 1,014 1.150 1.054 1,010 1,116 1,543 1.609 6.680 1.751 i :::rs a aa: _s:9:t :zsz:s ::::t2 L•:9as 28:319 zss:22 is:kes zs:s9s 2129:: :a 41 NET GAIN/ 166) fill) 124 617 67 1616 $]IS $66 4831 1241 $226 $119 k ILOSS) :::9:2 :zusz :seek s:9se saes 8:93:2 assess _:-zss .::191 L•9:29 ttzscs saes: 3,0 LANOfILL AT 2.250 3.090 3.000 3.000 3.050 3,OS0 I.OSO 3.050 3.550 4.5011 ICUM 6 NESI 4.500 4.500 1 40 AWFUL Pit 2.250 3.100 3.000 3.000 3.410 3.450 5.450 3.450 4.150 4 J SU 4.750 4.;S0 (Ct I.05H,U12 i i ' J n .r j . 1 _yr ~ 14 SCENARIO 7 I 1 it I 1 s ~+1 SCENARIO 07 CR-LC-DH.... Reta Mad Landfill Volume Constant, Direct Haul In this scenarlo, we assume retaining the commercial system, the deposi- tto landfill the DFW remains Landfill in Lewisville. disposal is tion handled through hauling CC~TIFRCIAL RATES In this scenario, commercial rates escalate at 3.5% per year until 1998 subsid9 and In the Year residential rates. Excess landfill 5% for 1999, 199 coommercial and Increase RESIDENTIAL RATES In this scenario, residential rates Increase by an average of 4.6% per year and rise to $15.00 at the year 2000. f LANDFILL RATES Landfill rates for users are held constant at $3.00 per cubic yard for 1991 and 1992. In 1993, commercial and residential landfill rates increase to $3.05 per cubic yard (1.6% Increase) and remain constant Increase to $3.45 through ) 1996. Rates for yard In 1993sandnremainrcontstant to 1996. (15 I 1 TIPPING FEES After the City's landfill closes In 1996, rates at the DFW Landfill are ! assumed to be $3.35 per cubic yard and escalate at 5% per year. i e L,eh1DFILL LIFE EXPECTANCY The landfill closes In July, 1996 in this scenarlo. 1 m 1A211A1/010991028/32 I - - - v~ IPF- 1 r NET GAIN/GLOSS) In this scenario, net gains generally escalate through 1996. When the direct hauling to DFW Landfill begins, losses are experienced and then the system Is near breakeven In 2000. i INCOME FOR GENERAL I" r 4 In this scenario, all existing administrative transfers to the general 1 fund will continue as is. The general fund will also receive approxl- i mately $248,000 fran the private hauiersO license fees during the period 1995 through the year 2000. yl ¢y ~ r Y r ~Hj 1I1~ r I alt r 1 IA2/IAI/010991028/33 -89- t 00 i ,I i r i - LANDFILL MANSION CODE; CR - CONK RETAIN LD - LANDFILL DECREASE Flll RATE LE 11 - LANDFILL INCREASE CS _ COMM SOLO LC - LANDFILL CURPENI Flll RAZE ON -DIRECT HAUL CAD - CONK RETAIN DECREASED LA - LANDFILL ACCELERATE FILL RAIE CRE - CORN RETAIN EKLUSIYE CO ERCIAL OfIIONS 1 I 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1996 1999 2000 SCENARIO 7 RES RATE 9.95 10.25 10.50 11.00 LIM 12.00 12.50 15.25 14.00 15.00 -23 WIN RAIE 1I5. Y 119.(5) 723.578 3 1252111 5 132216 137303 1416251 14(23S) 15(149) 164 2% CR-LC-DH ANN GAL) R 0 1 0 7 23 43 69 21 It I INTEREST 58 313 572 415 359 151 IS 39 CUM O/lll R. 12 5 p I3 26 /1 54 56 35 L1C FEE 0 0 0 SS 101 105 115 122 AD TRANS C 61 70 73 11 52 0 0 D 0 AO TRANS L 29 30 32 $4 36 34 E 1 ~ I i I Ash-~AGIAI.AY✓:.JY ,4.6tlYl.AY.. rum ,•.•.r••~...•.•••••.... I R a }4 i RES RATES & CUM NET GAIN = COMM RETAIN - LANDFILL CVRRENT - DIRECT HAUL 9 16 l .8 1 15 .7 W O.. 14 ER 6 r 13 .5 0 z i CA i 12 ,4 .3 11 2 10 Lu .1 cr) 9 LU 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 0 i CR-LC-QH I {{I --1 t _ _ I a S 1 4'Mgff~ f. nt■■J I t NlSIUFHII~~ IYUUOIASik u :34 1 i0uloknA - SINIUS UW J E : ~ LC-DH scene rto 1 ACTUAL AtIUAL IV IV FV FV FY FY FY FY FY FV 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 3991 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 I IOIAL ANNUAL MIUMER9 374,552 liS,944 116.280 717,302 118,666 161,348 185.711 190.563 195,171 200,211 205,691 210.662 2 Uuulc Voids Collected 11,031 19,114 19,494 19,95! 80,510 11,129 13,750 15,135 80,015 90,313 92,670 9S,069 3 Avg Cublc Me 1 Lust, 0.50 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 4 kvq MIN bill I LUSt 9.08 9.31 9.95 10.25 10.50 1t.00 11.50 12.00 12.50 13.25 14.00 15.00 , kF9LNUF3 5 Residential Fees 11.584 $1,638 $1.154 11,811 $1,916 11.995 $2.136 $2.284 62.440 $2.454 $2,677 13,163 6 pes Saeclal 41ckw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 SUSIOIAL - CUSI NEV 11,584 1L 636 11.754 $1.111 13,616 $1.995 $2.136 $2.284 12,440 12.654 $2.117 $3,163 1 30 Sale of Aafuse Da" 48 43 45 48 SO 54 51 62 66 12 11 63 fE` It Cate. Rev. 0 0 14 48 190 170 135 173 11 22 21 34 12 MOM Rev. 0 0 24 11 12 122 122 93 1311) 0 0 0 113 !VIAL AE YS $1,632 11,681 $1.691 $1,990 $2,126 $2.640 12.0D 0.612 12.213 12.141 $2.981 13.28!1 EKPENUITUNES 14 Pavroil 6686 $168 1161 1199 $839 $861 $925 $971 $1,241 11,303 $1.366 $1.436 j IS Swaltes 234 161 229 230 248 258 266 219 304 316 329 342 I 16 Nafntenance I65 119 i52 159 147 US 104 193 233 245 251 270 11 sprvlcrs 129 19 l61 207 190 116 LOS 196 261 276 206 212 to Insulance 26 26 26 27 28 29 30 31 42 44 46 As 19 sundry I 0 0 D 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 N 2C Bad Debt 7 1 1 7 7 1 1 1 1 1 6 8 1 21 Adsln transfers 00 171 283 243 253 265 214 265 296 319 394 410 426 22 Adain Irensfers CC 0 0 47 40 SO 52 54 56 56 60 62 64 23 Landfill Ewenne 196 245 236 240 246 249 255 262 0 0 0 0 24 riming roe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 295 316 342 369 15 SnfN EXPEHSk3 11,606 61,193 Mete 11,918 12,038 $2.102 12,191 12.289 12-821 12,962 $3.110 13.235 26 NEI uF OPERAIloN3 126 (6112) 124 $12 190 $238 6256 1323 (1608) (1215) 111291 145 CAP AHO NUN UNEA EXPENSE 27 Fixed Assets s0 112 116 120 11 $20 120 $20 $20 120 120 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 Otbt Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 o! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 Pet et on Inv nv tram 0 0 0 0 0 O 11 0 0 E. 31 Ilya in Ilonkiw can 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O D $1 101 NUN COLA EKN 10 612 $16 120 if 120 120 $to $20 $20 $20 • ,110 3/ 101 UP 6 null W EKP 11.606 11,603 II.BaS 11,998 $2.045 $2,122 82.214 12.301 12,641 62,981 $1,134 15.255 ~110-2:11 121x131 t„-122 s2scls assist 2:112211 tslas$ $21122 19111[1 21112211 !tell! 22:1112 SS Hit VAIN/MUSS) 11111it& 2 11112x1 r.2.2 -11=1 22 fat -steam 11f2aa :foss assassl a=12351 ti1Lle) -et12t 36 11OLK S1 AI t 1.501 0 1 O 1 23 43 69 21 11 1 1 31 CUM AIIN Nkl GAIN/IL0581 $12 65 tae $313 1512 194 $359 $151 813 lit I S8 KgCEHI CHI) IN MIH BILL 2.51% t.671 3.02% 2.141 4.16% 4.$$% 4.35$ 4.111 6.001 5.66% 7.141 t ANUIILI. RAI$ NEStDEIU TAI 2.250 5.091 1. II'lNl NAIE 500 2.625 2.156 2.494 3.039 3.191 3.350 3.518 3.694 3.118 4 COMMLW14 SOLIU YA31E PNUFUNMA - SIAhjgkkW 0:64t SOW) (1 X 1000) CR-LC-ON ACTUAL ACTUAL FV FV FY FY FY FY FY FV FY FY Scarwrlo 1 1949 1990 1991 1992 It93 1994 1995 1996 1991 1991 1999 2000 ` I lUlnt ANNUAL CUSTOMERS 14.629 13,802 12.729 12,761 12.455 12,954 13,148 11.465 13,601 14,151 14,521 !4,900 2 Cubic Yards Collected 191.195 09,252 162,050 112,904 183,965 165,312 1811,162 142,691 191,495 202,511 201,292 213,221 3 Avg Cubic We / Cust 13.08 12.99 14.31 14.31 14.31 14.31 14.31 14,31 14.31 14.31 14.51 14.11 4 Nth Bill / Cust 89.78 100,44 115:55 11939 125.11 121.11 132.59 111.23 142.04 149.14 156.59 164.42 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 D 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RFVENUEI I CoeAarc ul Fees 61,313 11,386 91.410 $1,528 61,591 11,660 11,743 $1.840 41.960 92.110 $2,274 52,450 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 11 SUeIOIAL - CUS1 AEV 11,313 11.386 11.410 11.526 11,591 11.660 81.745 41.445 11.960 12.110 82,274 82.450 12 License Fee 0 36 48 46 48 49 13 3 1 0 0 0 i3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t.iL 1S I01AI PEVENUES 61,313 11,422 11,518 11,516 61,619 11,709 11,156 11,151 11.961 92.111 12,214' 12.450 (XPtNOIIURES 16 Fsvroll 1428 1316 5416 Sm. 5461 1491 1534 $514 1660 1710 1164 1121 , 11 Suoolles 46 51 55 52 60 63 66 72 be 94 100 101 14 Malutenance 176 111 156 165 114 145 199 M 245 264 284 30S It Services 129 69 136 130 it 68 84 91 129 1S9 149 161 20 Insuranc.3 20 19 19 20 21 22 23 25 30 32 34 36 21 Sundry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 Bed Debt 4 6 6 6 1 6 6 7 1 7 1 1 2S Adein Itanslars 00 41 71 67 10 )3 71 82 88 101 108 115 122 24 Adain transfers OC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Landfill Erwense 430 555 $46 549 $61 565 $74 581 0 0 0 0 26 liogtno Fee 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 662 712 146 127 1 21 1014 EXPENSES 61.21S 11,339 61,403 11,436 111434 01,SOS 11.571 81,658 11,921 12,065 12.221 12.388 28 NE1 OKA REV3 130 181 1115 1131 1205 1204 Ills SL93 640 646 IS3 162 CAN AND N014 OPER EXPENSE 29 Fixed Assets to 111 141 190 115 134 11SO 120 122 024 126 526 50 Oebt Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 Other Evperae 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 Aft W Inv Trans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 Incr in Uorkfnq Cap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3S 101 NUN (MEN EXP to 11t 541 190 115 634 650 120 122 524 126 124 11 36 107 OPER/IqN OPER EXP 412141 14.194 141444 41,114 HIM 112111 412114 Iloilo 112141 11441 112141 43:144 31 NE1 OAIN/ILU531 670 N2 414 148 1190 1110 1135 9111 616 922 627 134 2:223: :51181 -:2133 -sees 2:e:2s 2:2226 22222: 212[22 222312 2!2222 -:else resist Se PEIA:ENI cM IN M1M BILL 21.901 15.021 3.50% S.Sn 3.Sn 3.50% Mot 3.50% 5.001 5.004 S.ULM IANOFILL RATE C(ARIEKIPL 2.250 3.094 3.000 5.000 3.050 3.030 3.050 3.050 IIPPINO RATE 2.500 2.625 2.156 2.694 3.039 3.191 3.350 MIN 3.694 3.118 , few... 1 I J 1 "1 t r ! LANDFILL PAOFORNA ' Sthtu3 QUO : (Sit loon) 97 9t 20 92 93 94 9S 14 FY FY PY 09:34231 09 !0 9 L I FY FY FY Fy CR-LC.oN ACTUAL ACTUAL 1995 1994 19 Scenario 1 list N!0 1991 19921 19.6 1990 1.fo NltO 2 a 1 CY Res. &1.031 79,114 19,494 79,955 111310 ,510 11.771 •3,150 IS.ISS G 2 CY Case 191.295 119,252 1&2,030 117,904 ,965 1&9.312 111.162 O 3]) 29,111 30.197 31,251 0 3 CY Cssh So.iSl t&&04 21. 912 29.110 29, 74 2,15S 0 0 O 4 Cy Cont. 53.795 61.141 61.11& 69.510 10.115 11,167 72.st2 . 611 O 0 0 2,203 1,916 1,996 2,001 210113 7.053 T, 102 0 0 S CY Other ,640 563,656 566,00& 370,156 377,319 314,635 0 0 0 p 4 Tot CY US, On 351.00/ 361 2N 1610 3225196 3591201 3961559 13]&711 17255/3 7 Cue. CY 213492S 2500000 0 0 0 0 REVENUES 126 213 201 209 242 246 151 256 0 0 0 0 1 Contract Fees /1 1111 101 Los to$ 110' 0 0 a 0 6! It 1 1 1 O 0 0 0 ! Cash Fees 5 6 6 4 0 0 0 231 240 216 249 $71 4 262 D to other Fees 196 245 S! 0 D it Ms Fees 430 553 544 S49 $61 0 510 560 0 0 12 Coss Fees 0 0 D -----o 0 l 1S 61,22 .109 $1,0/5 11.091 f1 J67 /1.110 w 1!D 0 20 0 la 10 0 0 11 SU&101AL REV1 .1121 11 0 0 0 y -_..0 D 0 0 0 0 9 0 It 0 0 0 0 16 $821 11.109 11,06S 11.091 21,157 11.170 (1,193 {1.229 110 f0 t0 11 lot AEY 1511 6344 p 0 + EXPENOIIURE3 1775 fill 1261 $2111 $2" $311 10 $0 110 D 0 11 Fsvroll /1 41 D 0 41 0 19 $uooties 23 lit 1141 119 15311 Its 9 170 0 0 0 0 115 210 1150 11111 113 0 0 TO Naint iSS 54 154 232 301 322 12 13 0 D D 21 Services to 10 111 12 0 0 0 0 22 Ins 9 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 a p 0 0 I l l 23 Sundry 0 1 1 1 Se 0 0 0 0 24 Bad Debt 1 1 30 32 34 36 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 D 211 Adstn translate 21 34 29 0 0 p 0 74 Adetn 1»sr7e» p 0 0 p 0 - 0 0 - t0 t0 21 Estnl LF S0 10 . 28 iOiAl EXD I566 1910 t611 1614 1109 1109 1142 11 1415 $341 $461 1431 1104 SO f0 so /o 10 1 t0 29 NEI OPER REYEN" $255 .°$199 - 5271 10 311 00 t0 0 CAP ANO NON MR EXPENSE t0 tp $6 $1S 164 1o $6 30 Flaed Mats f0 U3 115 lit 160 0 0 0 311 Debt lerv 163 2110 209 100 1100 100 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 32 Osbt 1. Fd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 O 33 Rat On Inv Irene 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 15 45 4f 45 0 31 Inc in lbrk tap 0 0 D 411 0 4S to to 35 psbt Rte 0 309 4311 1Stt t0 - 36 101 NOW OPER EXP '--1263 1211 1247 $331 $336 $339 1 0 _ 3111 p a !1 IOI UPER/NOrI OPE -.129 - 1.121 .1.061 --1.011 1--I,IIS 1,011 1,01111 1.12! r. t0 f0 :zsu a ssetss '2.921 22 211 .3291! m 1122 *octal samosa smuts sa:aes s azs szsz: 93 223111 to 0000 31 NE1 GAIN/ ($1) ($12) 212222 ILOSS) %stst■ uttn a au 3.000 23 OSO active 3.050 3.OSD 23-050 0.000 20 2000 $ 0 0000.000 0.0 $9 LANDFILL Of 2.250 1.091 3.000 (CONK 6 REFS) 2.250 3.100 5.000 3.000 3.450 3.450 3.150 ' 3.450 0.000 0.000 JD IANO►Ill , +rl is Ayye 1It I 7• ~I SCENARIO 8 i {I 1 I N 7 . SCENARIO 48 CRE-LI-LE ...Ccmmerclal Retained, City becomes the Exclusive Provider, Landfill Volume Increases, Landfill Is Expanded. In this scenario the City Implements the SWAC recommendation and becomes the exclusive provider of Comnerclal Solid Waste service. The City's volume of commercial waste deposited in the landfill Increases slightly. The landfill would be expanded In 1996. COMMERCIAL RATES In this scenario commercial rates would remain constant through 1992. In 1993 through 1997 commercial rates would increase 3.54 each year. In 1998 through the year 2000 rates would increase by 5% to year. RESIDENTIAL RATES In this scenario residential rates would Increase by 2.014 to $10.15 in 1992 and remain at that level In 1993. In 1994 residential rates would Increase to $10.25 (.94). In 1995 through the year residential rates I would increase an average of 4.644 per year with a rate of $13.45 in the year 2000. p LANDFILL RATES j In this scenario landfill rates would remain constant at $3.00 per cubic yard In 1992. In 1993 rates would Increase slightly by 1.64 to $3.05 per cubic yard and remain at that level through 1996. In 1997 landfill rates would Increase by 14.759 to $3.55 per cubic yard. In 1998 rates would increase by 279 to 54.50 per cubic yard and remain at that level f through 2000. Relative to contract and cash customers landfill rates will remain constant at $3.00 per cubic yard In 1992. In 1993 rates will increase to $3.45 (154) per cubic yard and remain at that level through 1996. In 1997 rates will increase to $4.75 (37.74) per cubic yard and remain y constant through the year 2000. F TIPPING FEES Not applicable. i -95- i 1 . r 1 LANDFILL LIFE EXPECTANCY In this scenario the existing landfill will be full in March, 19961 however; this scenario includes the expansion of the landfill which will last beyond the year 2000. NET GAIN (LOSS) In this scenario the system will produce slight amounts of net Income In 1992 and 1993, In 1994 through 2000 the system will produce significant amounts of net income. 8y the end of year 2000 the system wlII have accuTulative net gain of $3.45 million. INCOME FOR GENERAL FUND In this scenario administrative transfer from the system will remeln as is with some annual escalation due to growth. Tha funds the City currently receives from private hauler license fees will be eliminated. i 1 Pi ~r 1 ; E t i s -96- 4 p a CR _ COW RE1A1N LO LANDFILL DECREASE FILL RATE L£ - IpNDFllt EXPANSION CODE: CS - COW SOLD LC - LANDFILL cUWHI FILL RAZE ll - LANDFILL INCREASE CRO - COW RETAIN DECREASED LA - LANDFILL ACCELERATE FILL RATE DH - DIRECT HAUL C CRE - COMM RETAIN EKCLUSIV£ COMMERCIAL OPIIONS 1991 1997 1993 1994 1995 1996 199? 1995 1999 20u0 a ~ SCENARIO 0 RES RATE 9.95 10.15 1035 10.25 10.80 11.35 12.00 17.10 13.10 13.15 t COMM RAZE II3.S5 97.05 100.15 103.91 101.60 111.37 115.21 121.03 127.05 133.44 I CRE-LI-LE ANN O/W R 12 23 T 154 370 465 266 115 $20 111 INTEREST 0 1 3 3 1S 44 82 105 145 198 CUM O/Il7 R 12 S6 466 203 SSO 1,090 1.441 1.970 21640 3.4S3 ; L1C FEE 0 0 AD TRANS C 67 96 101 106 113 120 120 137 146 155 ; AD IAANy L 29 30 32 34 36 SS 40 43 46 49 1 ` k ~ kS i _ w RES RATES & CUM NET GAIN = COMM EXCLU - LANDFILL INCREASE - LANDFILL EXPAND 15 O f tY 14 W LL, 13 12 cl) i1 1 10 i W d W 9 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2x40 cr. CRE-LI-LE 1 { 1 1 1 r$ 1 ~M1r. ~ IM.^ay. rs 4 1 q RESIOENTIAL SOLID MATTE PRMM4 STATUS OW L ' - / ` If R 10001 M1 L2:13:32 CRE-LI-LE FV fY rV rY FY FY FY FY FY 1969 1990 1991 1992 1993 1,1114 1995 1996 1991 1948 1999 200 Scenario 9 ACTUAL ACTUAL FY 1 I - r Sol .660 .346 ,ILI -343 1 105AL ANNUM CUlTONERS 171,031 179 111 179 191 179,955 170 111,719 1SS,no 1$5.935 lee,O1S 90.313 292 170 295 OH ` Z Cubic Yards Collected .30 0.45 O.IS 0.13 0.13 0.41 0.4S 0.45 O.IS 0.45 0.45 0.13 3 Avg Cubic Yds / Cu9t 09.01 9.31 9.95 10.15 10.0 10.25 10..0 11. 33 12 .00 17. 10 13.10 13.15 ' 4 Avq Nth fill I Cwt REYENUTS t1.3S4 11.639 11.731 $t.too $1.113 11.154 $2. 0 004 12.1690 12.310 /2.51 0 tt.N0 12.5 0 M1 5 T1es(dentla1 Foes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ` 6 Res Special Pickup 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 1S9 $2 9 SU.l01AL - CURT REY 11.584 11.6!1 11.154 11.000 11.113 II,.006 12.167 12,56= tZ..'= f2.47 !2.163 43 4. 17 S0 54 !7 t 10 Sale of Refuse Be(* 16 16 53 162 230 519 I4 346 LS7 231 321 0 11 121 26 134 132 103 1341 299 210 2301 I1 Cosa. Rev. 0 12 Landfill 1bv. 0 0 0 - 0 • 13 1! R 61.632 11.611 11..91 1 $2,021 12.052 12.216 12,594 12.714 S7 J2L 13.063 ./91 70 /1.011 $1,314 l1, 191 14 TOTAL REVS 321 ERVENOIIURE9 17.1 $761 $199 1839 Sell 1921 $911 $1.0 311 IS favroll 168229 231 241 259 266 279 290 302 224 231 16 supplies t76 0 i34 141 114 132 IS4 161 its 114 193 203 213 115 194 204 21.4 224 236 11 NainteMnee 129 It 161 101 190 116 30 31 32 33 ZN 30 IS Services 26 26 20 27 0 26 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 Insurance 3 0 0 1 6 t 6 ` 20 fundrY 1 1 1 1 1 320 331 346 1 263 IN ZIS 296 306 40 62 44 Debt 2SJ 36 21 bad 1;0 263 0 2 41 41 10 $2 54 56 2! Adain innsfm 00 311 404 411 421 211 255 261 23 AdalA 1nMhn CC 194 243 246 210 246 - 24 Landfill END"" (1.106 11.194 61.64 11,911 12.031 {2,102 $2_194 $2~ZH 12./SS {2.627 12,111 12.1.. _ $26 -1$111) . $21 $41 . -~$14 t174 1390 N6S 1266 1436 /5} 23 1014t EXPENSES - 120 120 120 120 •420 40 6437 ' 26 NET OF OPERATIONS 120 120 , CAN AND NON OPEA ERPENIE $0 $12 fit $10 ti 0 0 0 0 27 Fi>tad Assets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 , 21 Debt Service Q 0 0 0 0 19 Other [*Or** 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 lot on Inv Trans 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 Incr in Yorking Cap Q 0 9 0 0 0 SIT - $20 120 !10 620 $20 S3 101 NON OF ER EXP to - 612 ...$16 I ..520 _ t1 $10 20 $ZO 20 - 214 $2.309 12,455 $2.641 $1.142 12,160 S6 101 (k 4 NUN C4' ERP 11.606 (1,605 $1.115 ! 11 .994 12.043 12, et ei assets 17, _ _ 112 saril4 (6121) esasl2 a t123 sa s67 `:5154 as13T0 s/46S 1266 $411 f320 1411 . RSI 31 Nk1 flA1N/IlOSS1 ::s ass sass asaa■ s races assets ssssao esas,s :aadds ssssis aas106 s :141 213112 as* 1 44 0 1,144 11,971 !2 , 410 q./14 . 1 S6 INTEREST AT t 1.50$ 112 136 046 6206 1516 {1,097 J 2 It CUM ANN NET GAIN/(LOSS) 2.51$ i.211~ 2.011 0.001 0.991 6.37% S.0" S.1St S.63t .ISt .611 39 PERCENT CHI IN NTH BILL •J r t COMMERCIAL rXID WAVE PROFORMA - STATUS 9110 f *t 4 12s13:37 (1 X 1000) ' CRE-l1-1.E ACTUAL ACTUAL FV FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY Scenario 0 1119 1990 1991 1992 1997 1991 1,195 119t 1991 1991 1919 2000 ` . 1 TOTAL ANNUAL CUSTOMERS l4,429 13,102 12 J20 22,291 72.426 22,599 22,931 23,191 21,016 11,411 23,372 25,993 2 Ctbic Yards Collected 191,295 119,252 162,030 160.250 261,159 263,115 267,732 214,114 211,011 211,149 295,670 $07,346 3 Avg Ctbic Vds / Cust 13.01 12.99 1{.31 11.67 1167 11.61 11.47 11.61 11.41 11.61 11.41 11.61 1 4 Mth Bill / Cust 11.78 100.46 115.55 97.05 100.15 103,96 107.60 111.57 115.21 121.03 121.06 135.11 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 REVENUEI , 7 Canercial Fees $1.313 $1.386 $1.470 $2,164 $2,253 $2.349 $2,461 62.414 $2,715 92,986 13,219 $3,461 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ; 11 SUBIOIAL - CUI1 REV $1,713 $1,386 $1,170 12,164 12,253 12,349 $2,666 $2,616 $2,775 $2,998 3.219 $3,169 12 License Fee 0 36 49 46 48 49 13 3 1 0 0 0 11 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 a 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 15 MAI REVENUES $1.317 91,422 $1,519 $21212 $7,301 $2,39' $2,161 $2,619 121116 $2,980 '2_1 'I EVEN011URES ' 16 Payroll 1428 6376 $418 $508 1531 5512 1615 1661 $110 SW 1623 1865 IF IwVIEN 41 51 SS TO 73 71 82 11 93 100 104 113 11 Maintenance 175 111 154 170 310 191 206 221 230 256 275 294 ' 19 Services 129 69 136 401 403 350 175 is$ 202 216 234 252 20 lnsursnce 20 19 19 22 27 24 26 21 21 31 33 36 21 Sundry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 Oad Debt 4 6 4 1 1 1 9 9 9 9 10 10 1 23 Adain Transfers 00 47 78 61 94 101 106 113 120 121 137 144 ISS t 24 "in transfers CC 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 4! 25 Landfill Ever" 430 555 $46 111 790 905 917 836 998 1,291 1,331 1,365 ' 26 10IAL EXPENSE! $1,283 $1,331 11,403 $2,064 q,124 92,134 12,042 $2,150 12,406 $2,812 12,911 $3,113 i 21 NET OPER REVS $30 187 $llt $141 $l7T /2d1 1431 $169 1368 1114 1262 6355 CAP AND NON OPER EXPENSE 21 Fitted Assets $0 $11 111 $95 W S34 150 $20 $22 124 $26 126 29 Debt Service 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 30 OtMr Eupanse 0 a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 1 Met On Inv Trans 0 0 O a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 32 Incr in Mortina Cap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 ; 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / lOt XM UPER EXP .$0 $1t 141 195 615 614 00 620 $22 424 $21 128 5 IOt OPE7t/NON OPEN EXp 6,233 $1.$50 0.441 f2,iS9 12,139 $2.168 $7.092 $2,110 62,130 92.636 $7,913 $7114t s2ata2 Saw a 2stslr 222 rte 181818 222222 am$$ ex2122 221183 32222■ 222222 22218; 6 MEi VAIN/IIOSSI 130 11! 111 153 1162 1230 $319 $449 $346 $1112 $234 1121 , 21222 1822s2 212212 a2e2u a18e3 2suse 222218 2x112 22sw 22211 n2218 11821 1 PENCENI CHO IN MIN 1111 11.101 11.02$ I-t4.Ol$ S.S01 3.49$ 3.501 3.501 1.501 5.00$ 5.001 on J i 1 - T-- - -r ,~y -r -mss I,! r .iP tANUFIIL PROFORMA - Sirm QUO r F (t X 10001 12:13: l1 l CRE-Ii-LE ACTUAL ACTUAL FV FY FT FV TV FY FY FY FY FY Scenario a 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 I Cif Res. 61,031 19,111 79,494 191955 80.SID 11.219 83,150 85.835 $0.015 90,311 92,410 93,019 2 CY Coss. 191,295 119,252 112,030 2601250 241,759 263,115 261,132 214,184 281,011 281,149 295,610 303.384 S CY Cash 301151 28,804 21,912 29,110 29,334 29,114 30,492 31,251 32,045 12,681 33.739 34,420 4 CI Cont, 53,195 68,148 69,111 6,960 1,011 2,119 7,290 1,412 1,662 1,862 1,061 8,211 S CY tither 2,203 1,986 1,996 21007 2,023 1,053 2,102 216SS 2,209 2,261 2,326 2,511 6 Tot CY 365.015 3S8,004 341,640 318,282 310,100 381,500 391,366 400,891 410,943 421,472 432,472 443,759 1 Cum. CY 2,131,925 2,500,000 2.06!.t0 3,239,922 3,620,623 4,005,123 1,396,489 4,197,386 5,208,128 5,679,800 6,062,272 6,506,031 REVENUES 0 Contract Fees 111 113 208 21 24 25 25 26 36 37 38 39 9 Cash Fees 69 89 81 87 101 103 SOS 108 152 156 160 144 10 Other Fees S 4 6 6 7 1 1 1 10 11 11 11 11 Res fees 196 245 238 240 246 249 235 262 312 406 411 420 12 Comm Fees 430 555 S44 781 798 805 811 836 991 1,297 1,331 1,365 Cr 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I/ SUBTOTAL-REVS 9921 51,109 SIMS 81.135 SIX 11,188 11,210 11,239 81,509 Sir90i 81,957 92,008 IS D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 11 101 REV $021 11,109 11,085 $1,135 $1,116 11.111 111,210 $1,239 11,509 11,907 11,931 $2,008 r I EXPENDITURES N 18 Payroll 1223 $271 1261 1281 1290 1317 $341 5366 1394 1124 1136 1491 19 Swolie9 25 $4, 47 31 48 so 41 44 41 50 53 56 i 20 Koinl 135 232 131 141 154 164 171 190 205 220 231 25S 71 Services 154 308 322 ITS 210 ISO 141 113 116 200 215 232 22 Ins 9 10 10 10 11 12 11 13 14 Is 16 11 23 Sundry 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 led Debt 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 25 Admin Transfers 0 21 34 29 30 32 34 36 31 40 43 46 49 t 26 Admin Transfers C 0 21 Extnl lF 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 1OIAL EXP 1566 1910 $814 1616 1814 1715 1769 1125 1111 4953 11,024 11,101 29 NEI Met REVENUES 1255 1199 1211 1459 5362 1413 6441 $414 1622 8954 1933 ..1907 CAP AND WIN OKA EXPENSE 30 Fixed Assets /0 10 s0 to 16 III 10 It 60 10 t0 10 31 Debt $ery 263 211 202 193 183 179 164 160 656 656 656 636 31 tandfill closure 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 IS Ret On Imv Irani 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 34 Inn in Fork Cep 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O SS Debt Retirement - - -0 0 ' 45 4S 411 43 4% 45 0 0 0 O i 16 IOI NON OPEN EIIP 5263 1211 611) 6738 1336 1339 1109 1311 5656 1656 1656 1636 31 ivl (fERYw* OPER 829 1,112 I.061 1.;u LIS0 1,054 1,018 I,136 1,513 1,609 1,610 /,257 9t-trt -09828 122tft t12ttt turfs ■ut93 9212#2 1:2111 tuts$ mortal 181212 attest 38 NEI GAIN/ ISO) 11121 124 1111 126 1134 1132 $103 46341 1291 1211 Iasi (LOSS I 919 a t1 999292 9211!1 -21212 9f stan fir12l 922122 91f221 822932 292811 tangos $$atss 19 IANDFILL RI 2.250 3.098 3.000 3.000 3.050 3.050 3.050 3.050 3.550 4.500 4.500 4,500 4C(MK 6 RES) 40 IANDFIII R1 2,250 3.100 3.000 3.000 5.450 3.450 3.450 3.450 4.1$0 1.750 4.15Q 1,150 ~ IfYlN1,CA9N.61) i I III I 1 ~4 I _ _ - - 1819993