Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
02-05-1991
t t ~u AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL February S. 1991 i I Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, February 5, 1991, at 4:00 p.m. In the Civil Defense Room of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: 4:00 p.m. 1. Continue a discussion regarding the potential sale of the City's commercial solid waste system, consider possible alternatives, and give staff direction. 5:15 P.M. 2. Executive Session: i A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Consider action in County vs. City, B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Petsonnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), t~ Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. "l 1. Consider appointments to the Building Code Board, Community Development Block Grant Committee, the Electrical Code Board, the Historic Landmark Commission, the Human Services Committee, the Animal Shelter Advisory Committee, the Blue Ribbon Committee for Storm Water Utility and the Sign Board of Appeals. 3. Presentation of the Comprehensive Annual Finance Report for the year ended September 30, 1990. 4. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding a proposed five year strategic plan. 5. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the placement of a historical site marker on the Quakertown Site (Civic Center Park). ~ a 5 YY i r 0 ~ R F 4Y a na 1 i a I City of Denton City Council Agenda Fobrudry 5, 1991 Page 2 Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, February S. 1991, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 215 B. McKinney, Denton. Texas at which the following items will be considered: 7:00 p.m. `r 1. Pledge of Alle;iance 2. Consider approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of January 8 and January 22, 1991. 3. Consider approval of a resolution of appreciation for Walter Keen. 4. Public Hearings a A. Hold a public hearing and consider rezoning a 5.165 acre tract from Agricultural District to Neighborhood Service District on property located approximately 600 feet south of University Drive on the west side of Bonnie Brae. (The Planning and Zoning Commission made no recommendation). B. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance amending Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances to allow one-family dwelling within specified non-residential districts. ( The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval). 9 C. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance amending Appendix B, Zoning, Code of Ordinances concerning planned develtpments. (The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval). i D. Hold a public hearing and consider approval of a resolution amending the concept map of the Denton i Development Plan to provide for the expansion of the Special Purpose Activity Center and amending E the boundaries of intensity Areas N1, 9, 10, 951 105, 107, 109, 110 and 111 of Appendix A. (The ; Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval.) J 1 1 r•p I `l\ r' L ' City of Denton City Council Agenda February 5, 1991 Page 3 i 5. Consent Agenda Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be { approved for payment under the ordinance section of the } agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the ! i ordinances (Agenda items 6.A, 6.B, 6.C). This listing to j provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance. A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid #1187 - Synthetic Floor North Lakes F (Repair) 2. Bid #1206 - Propane Conversion (For Trial Use) s 3. Bid #1205 - Street light Beads 4. Bid #1212 - Fiberglass Tanks 5. Bid #1214 - 02 Diesel Electric Production 6. Bid #1143 - Airport Infield Drainage 7, Bid #1185 - Willowspring Drainage f s S. Bid #1201 - McKinney At Bell Intersection Improvements 9. P.O. #11956 - Traffic Eng 6 Controls 10. P.O. 011970 - DACO, Inc. i) 1 ' 9 B. Tax Refunds 1. Consider approval of a tax refund for Commodore Financial for $575.72, 1 2. Consider approval of a tax refund for Banc One Mortgage for $2,286.15. 3. Consider approval of a tax refund for New Start P/S for $754.68. M 1 1 , A. 1 E 1 City of Denton City Council Agenda February 5, 1991 Page 4 6. Ordinances A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. (S.A.1. - Bid #1187, 5.A.2. - Bid #1206, 5.A.3. - Bid #11205, 5.A.4. - Bid #1212, 5.A.5. - Bid #1214) B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting. competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. i (5.A.6. - Bid 01143, 5.A.7. - Bid #1155, 5.A.8. - Bid 01201) C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for purchases of materials or equipment which are available from i one source in accordance with the provisions of E state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. (5.A.9. - P.O. ; #11956, S.A.10 - P.O. 0011970) f D. Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas, prohibiting the parking of vehicles on the east side of South Bonnie Brae Street, fns m its intersection with FNIS15 to its intersection with Willowwood Street. (Citizen's Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends approval.) E. Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City 4 Council of the City of Denton amending Chapter 2 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton by adding Article V1; providing for the creation of a Downtown Development Advisory Board; and providinf; for the adoption of powers and duties of the Advisory Board. 1 F. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing an exchange of land between the City of Denton and Rayzor Investments, Ltd. (The Park and Recreation Board and Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval.) 0. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a contract providing for the exchange of certain real property owned by NCNB and the City of Denton and authorizing the acceptance of an access easement from NCNB. (The Library Board and 191 Committee recommend approval.) x r( City of Denton City Council Agenda February S. 1991 Page 5 7. Resolutions A. Consider approval of a resolution adopting an infrastructure financing policy for economic development. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval). 8. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. A. Recnive the Upper Trinity Regional Water District Application for Texas Water Development Board funds for Denton Water Plant Project and associated water transmission pipelines. 9. Official Action on Executive Session Items: b i A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments lo. New Business: This item provides a section for Council Mombers to suggest items for future agendas. 11. Executive Session- i A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(q), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. : NOTE: THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT IS LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE. j C E R T I F I C A T E a I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City H,ll of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of _ 1991 at - o'clock i CITY SECRETARY 3344C w 1 6 ~~r r a f f I CITY of 0801M. TMS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM DATE: February 11 1991 TO: Lloyd V. Harrell► City Manager 1 i FROM: John McGrane, Executive Director of Finance SUBJECT: Management Letter Responses Attached are the responses by staff to the Deloitte and Touche y management letter observations and recommendations.' If you have any questions, please advise. Cpl i J f A 1 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 431.2529 i t, UTILITY FUND ' Sanitation Operations Observations A review of the operating results for sanitation operations for the 1990 fiscal year reveals a net lose for the year of $194r900. This lose increased the deficit in retained earnings by 931 to $404,500 for the Sanitation Fund from September 300 1989. it appears that the current sanitation rates do not adequately reflect the City's costs in delivery of sanitation services. i i Recommendation: Conduct a study to determine the rates necessary to cover operating and nonoperating expenses and transfers associated with sanitation operations. The study might also include consideration of contracting with private entities as a means to deliver economical sanitation services. cl, Responses The Utility Department is currently conducting a study to determine the sale of any or all portions of the solid waste operations. This study is currently being presented to City Council with various recommendations. ACCOUNTINO PROCEDURES AND ISSUES Documentation of Internal Accounting Control Procedures observations The City does not maintain documentation of internal accounting ' control procedures. While it appears that control procedures are adequate, documentation of these procedures, with timely updates, would provide additional assurance that all procedures are being followed. Documentat.on would also assist in delegating accounting responsibilities and detailing the necessary procedures for meeting those responsibilities. Recommendations Consider preparing an accounting policies and procedures manual, The manual would document internal accounting control procedures and assign responsibilities within the Accounting Department. Personnel in the Department should be given responsibility for maintaining the manual and providing for periodic update. Response: Staff agrees with this recommendation. d Notification of Employee Termination observations The current policy related to employee resignations (Policy No. 112.01) requires employees to submit a termination form to their supervisors whop in turn, submit the form to the Personnel Department. No procedures exist to insure that the supervisors actually submit the termination form. Such situation could allow an employee to remain on the City's payroll or receive benefits for an extended period of time after the effective date of their resignations Recommendations In addition to informing their supervisors of their resignation, employees should submit the required termination form directly to the Personnel Department. , ( Responses Staff agrees with this recommendation. s s r . J, 'I YFi~ 1 1 ~ t Responses to Management Letter Year Ended 1990 Page 2 i ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES AND ISSUES (continued) f Federal and state Grants i Observation: During the year a federal grant awarded to a City department was not reported to the Accounting Department in a timely manner. The grant allowed the City to match fund with in-kind services and donations. However, Incomplete documentation was maintained to support the in-kind services provided to match the grant funds received. ~ r Recommendation: :)evelop procedures for monitoring the preparation and i submission of grant applications as well as documentation requirement necessary to comply with grant conditions, The review process would ensure consideration of any cost-benefit evaluation and timely notification of the Accounting Department to maintain adequate accounting records. Responses There are procedures for submission of all grant applications and review process of financial reports to comply with grant applications. In the specific case that was observed by the auditors, the procedures were not followed, we have since notified that department and they are currently complying with the procedures. i Pixel Assets In,,fentory Observation: The City has performed periodic physical inventories of fixed assets purchased with federal fund:. However, a complete physical inventory 11 has not been performed in several years for all City fixed assets. Recommendations Perform a complete city-wide fixed asset physical inventory to ensure that fixed assets continue to be accurately reflected in the ) financial statements. Periodic physical inventories establish additional control over the City's fixed assets and assist In evaluating the City's insurance needs. Responses Staff agrees with this recommendation. Although the cost for such an inventory has not been budgeted# each budget year a package is submitted but# due to economic condltionso has not been able to be funded. Staff continually tries to update its inventory with periodic checks, We will review the audit committee's recommendation of looking at the bar coding of assets and will evaluate the coat of such a program in the next budget process. INTERNAL AUDIT Observations Currently, the City relies on its system of internal accounting control and the annual independent audit to provide assurance that the financial statements are fairly presented, While this reliance is adequate, an internal audit function would provide an additional control level and establish a system which would better monitor operations and the accounting system of the City. a , I' Responses to management Letter i Year Ended 1990 ' Page 3 i INTERNAL AUDIT i (continued) EE I Recommendation: Consider establishing an internal audit function, Internal auditors' duties and responsibilities vary widely among cities. Frequently, internal auditors are involved with operational reviews and special projects as contrasted with the traditional role of financial auditing. The internal auditor should have no authority over nor responsibility for the activities examined. In order for objectivity to be maintained, we suggest I that the individual performing this function report directly to the City manager and report semiannually to the Audit committee of the city Council. This type of arrangement should provide a level of internal control through segregation of responsibility and give the internal auditor the authority i required to operate across departmental lines to best perform the job. Responses staff agrees with this recommendation, and has continually submitted in the budget process, a package to fund an internal auditor, Once again, because of economic conditions, the funding of such a position has not been available. a i t i JFMcCtaf 5629? 02/01/91 t e i 1 I ii f 1 I CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: February 50 1990 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: RESULTS OF IBM EXECUTIVE PLANNING SEMINAR I As you may recall, the City's Executive Staff, along with the Personnel and Information services Director, participated in a Strategic Planning Seminar provided by IBM on July 24th, 25th and 26th. IBM provided the complementary training to give staff strategic planning skills to further strengthen the council- management team and jointly implement initiatives that will guarantee future organizational success. It would have been ideal to have had Council participate and provide immediate feedback, but it would have been difficult for everyone to devote the time required to complete the session. However, I hope that our strong sense of teamwork has allowed us to accurately reflect Council's desires and viewpoint. This is the intention of the strategic plan. The session had several objectives. The first was to develop planning skills and terms that allow us to incorporate strategic planning into our daily organizational life. The second was to develop visions of a successful city organization at the planning horizon 1995 based on Council direction and staff's work. Third was to develop or refine a mission statement that would guide us to success. Fourth was to identify strategic opportunities to achieving success by evaluating our governmental competitors, R service markets and service menu. The fifth and final objective was to introduce high impact planning to activate these changes. The objectives were met in three days of intensive work (averaging 10 hours per day) involving an assessment of the current organization, identification of strengths and weaknesses, seeking opportunities to do new and better work and formulating strategies I to pursue those future opportunities. E The session provided management staff numerous benefits. We were able to build consensus on where the organization currently is, on where the organization wants to be and on the opportunities that we will need to capitalize on in order to ensure future success. The next step is to make sure that staff perceptions and the resulting strategic plan are on target with Council's direction. t nawrM~ 1 r Memo to Mayor and Council IBM Executive Planning seminar Page 2. Attached are several documents that will assist- you in reviewing the current City Council Goals and Priorities and the Proposed strategic Plan. Attachment I is the updated status report on City Council Goals and Priorities. The report covers the 16 Council established priority ` areas and contains changes that may have occurred since January 1990, the report's last revision. A summary of those changes are G included for your convenience. Attachment II is the proposed 1991-1995 Strategic Plan. It contains a Mission Statement that staff believes best articulates where City Council and staff would like to be in five years. This is followed by a list of five success elements that can be pursued to make the mission statement a reality. The success elements outline strategies that will allow us to take advantage of opportunities that promote our goals. Attachment III is a match-up of the proposed success elements and strategies and the current City Council goals and priorities. The match-up shows that there is a strong association between what staff is currently working on and what is proposed. Finally, Attachment IV provides a listing of items that did fit neatly into the proposed strategic plan success elements and strategies. Please review them for inclusion or exclusion in the proposed plan. The Executive staff has met ith the Department Directors to discuss the results of the .session. They concur with our assessments and are prepared r.o begin work on action plans. We request your review and appr;,val in order to ensure that we are properly articulating the & Ares of the Council. We are prepared to visit any of these subjects and make any revisions that you deem necessary- Sincere yi Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Attachments s ATTACHMENT 1 9 City Council Goals Update February 5, 1991 Public Safety Transportation Cir Analyze Development Process Downtown Development Energy Issues City Beautification Financing operations j improve City Image l User Fees Improve Relations with Minorities Neighborhood Identity I Interlocal Relations/Intergovernmental Relations Housing Goals Municipal Court of Record Space Plan Economic Development t i i ~I 1 ~N J t i Goal: public Safety r Team Leader: John Cook Charge: To identify areas both within the organization and the community where the provision of public safety services can be improved. f 1 ~ a i { j 1 10180 E -w. 4 Mal I` V Date: 01/29/91 Page 1 of 3 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN 4 GOAL/PRIORITY: PUBLIC SAFETY 'I IMPLEMENTATION TEAM: Johns Cook, Team Leader-Fire Rick Svehia-CMO ` Paulette Owens-Holmes-Personnel Michael Jez-Police Harry Persaud-Planning OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO [NEEDED BY ACCOMP- I RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ 1 I I LISHED I ! OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES I - f A. Lighting 1. Identify and target Michael Jez Yes COPS Program Established Targeted southeast high crime areas of Denton and Concrete the City. City. 2. Review street light Bob Nelson Ongoing Yes In Place Crime prevention officer c . patterns in those areas Michael Jez will do a block-by-block to provide maximum survey, protection. i i B. Response Times Seek ways to reduce time it takes to respond to emergencies. i. Make sure all Michael Jez Ongoing Yes Completed 800 MHz trunking system departmental person- and combined Police/Fire net understand dispatch system r. priorities given to operation. emergency calls. 2, Analysis of distri- Michael Jez Ongoing 12/89 Analysis being done bution of patrol ! officers, i 3, Pursue additions to Michael Jez on going Yes In Place the budget including John Cook R , dispatchers, Jailers and patrol officers to improve patrol coverage and to free up uniformed officers. 1138e/80 i 1 rya rr 1 i Date; 01/29/91 Page 2 of 3 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC ALAN GOAL/PRIORITY: PUBLIC SAFETY OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO INEEDED BYI ACCOMP- I RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I I I LISHEO I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES j C. Community Relations 1, Ascertain neighborhood Michael Jez, ongoing 12/89 In place COPS is operational needs through et al in southeast Denton, neighborhood meetings, 2. Second group being Michael Jez, ongoing 12/89 Second COPS teams Initial meeting held, formed. et al included in FY 89-90 association being budget. formed. 3, Train personnel in Michael Jez Ongoing 12/89 In place. COP members Public Relations. trained, i 4. Fire prevention John Cook Ongoing 12/89 Being reviewed. Forming No current impact. I training. 2 non-profit public education foundations, i D. Policing Elections in } Southeast Denton. j I o Providing officers in Michael Jez Ongoing 05/90 Southeast Denton COPS team j close proximity of will assist in this area polling places in south- during future elections. { east Denton RAmerican Legion Hall), E, Public Safety Component 0 Minority Relations Committee. 1. Provides Civil Service Michael Jez 12/89 Ongoing. Met with LULAC No current impact. Component to the John Cook and target area residents Minority Relations to discuss recruitment. Committee, 2a Civil Service Reform John Cook ongoing 07191 Reform efforts failed in No current impact. 71st legislature will try again in 199. k 1138e/81 EE. AIyrJ.J.wA✓iww w.OWtIrt.MMt.~.r.YN,Mr~JN~,'hY.YwMMA.W .Rana.. r: r. ra r ~l Page 3 of 3 Date: 01/29/91 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: PUBLIC SAFETY BYI ACCOMP- 1 RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO fNEEDEO i l LISHED 1 I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES ~ I F. Community Watch yes In place 1. To continue the Michael Jez Ongoing Neighborhood Gillis Hammett Watch Program. Yes In place on Your Own - Latch Key 2. Refocus and re-evaluate Michael HJez Ongoing in place, Dare program prevention program. Gillis being taught to grades 5 and 6. I Yes Implemented COPS in-place: 16 hours 3. Police visibility at Michael Jez Ongoing at MLK and 16 hours MLK. a week at Phoenix Apartments. G. Minority Recruitment Michael Jez Ongoing Being 1. Continue existing Implemented efforts for minority John Cook recruitment. implemented Affirmative action 2. Expand recruitment Police Ongoing onlimited advertising will w efforts by advertising Personnel basis target minority at and visiting more community, minority institutions. 3. Consider revalidation Police/ Ongoing 12/89 Budget supplements Key is Ch, 143 Reforms E included in the before le islature, of civil Service Exams Personnel budget to allow workin with LULAC and and procedures in order on for this re- OMEN on bilingual i to enhance hiring of validation, dispatchers. minority. 1138e/82 i if Goal: Transportation Team Leader: Rick Svehla ! Charge: To coordinate and improve the transportation planning and delivery systems in Denton, ° GE e r r ° I i I ! 10180 I w t~ r Dater 01/18/91 Page 1 of 4 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITYt TRANSPORTATION IMPLEMENTATION TEAMS Rick Svehla - Team Leader Jerry Clark Frank Robbins Catherine Tuck Harry Persaud OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY ACCOMp- RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ LISHED OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES E A. Coordination of y transportation planning and development 1s continue monitoring and Jerry Clark Ongoing i ' participating in re- Harry Persaud gional transportation planning 2s Seek representation on Rick Svehla Ongoing Jim Alexander NCTCOO Regional Trans- Rick Svehla, Liaison portation Committee 3. Seek representation on Jerry Clark Yes Supplied data but not Greater Dallas Mobility able to fund. Plan C Seek representation on Harry Persaud July Finished Pis, CTSSC briefed. Also Stemmons Freeway 1989 coalition on t-35 is being Sub-Area Study formed to stay on 10 year Development Plan. S, Coordinate the Planning Rick Svehla Ongoing Deahazo, Starek and Tang and DevelopV.ent of Jerry Clark will present 3/26/910 Also YM2499 will ask that the connec- tion from 2181 to 1-35 begin to be studied if funded by cities. Joint funding between cities and land owners$ i 1138e .._..,..,..»~..,~n.w..d..MXCdw:v.+.;u. ..ard:,u.+•.a ...._,~«.......-....,..ia.~....oew:+n,:...8 ~ri.wrc.4.n:»w......~. ......,..„-.,,.~a~ 1 J1I 1 ~J 1 q r~ Date: 01/18/91 Page 2 of PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: TRANSPORTATION OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO FNELDACCOKP- RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND LISBED OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES 1 S. Review, update# and Jerry Clark Ongoing Implement Denton County Harry Persaud Thoroughfare Plan NEW 7. Coordinate road Jerry Clark ongoing development efforts i with County Director of Public Works I . B. Coordinate and monitor public transportation services in the City 1. Participate in the Catherine Tuck Ongoing Two routes established, coordination of local Two being planned. Should { transportation services be implemented by 01/01/91. (SPAN) 21 Provide technical Natty Persaud ongoing i information to local Jerry Clark organisations to en- Catherine Tuck hance the quality of transportation services j 3. Participate in design Harty persaud ongoing and touting of local Jerry Clark services Catherine Tuck J J Co Improve the level of planning and maintenance of transportation systems I 11380 f, 1 I I 1 ~J r\ r.i Dater 01/18/91 PROGRESS REPORT Page 3 of 1 CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITYt TRANSPORTATION ' i OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY A000Mp- RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ LISHED OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES 1. Develop and Update Jerry Clark August Finished Collector street map Thoroughfare Plan and Harry Pereaud 1988 Collector Street Plan finished. 2. Acquire tools for Frank Robbins June modeling analysis Rick 6vehla 1484 Transplan Completed, consistent with NCTCOG Jerry Clack Council briefed Feb. S. s study area Final meeting being scheduled with COG. 3- Continue to improve Jerry Clark City streets through Rick Svehla Ongoing Asater planing and paving the maintenance coitinue to be used I program exc.ensively. 5.8 mi. done in 089, 6.6 mi- done in 40. Identify new funding Rick Svehle sources for infra- Jerry Clark Ongoing Two 9rrnts received struCture and 06M totaling 4110,000. expenditures 5. Upgrade and expand Rick Svehla traffic control Jerry Clark Ongoing Secured 20,000 in budget Capability by adding for bott eneck studios personnel and equip- and improvements# ment. 6. Continue updating and Jerry Clark July Complete Completed streets section refining the subdivi- Frank Robbins 1989 sion regulations and in June, 19881 drainage construction specifica- regulations reviewed and tions to optimize city approved by Council, street construction Sept., 1989, dollars i I ~ 1138e j 1 1 1 1 I Y r Page 4 of 4 Date: 01/18/81 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: TRANSPORTATION OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY IACCOMP- RESULTS ORPCURRENT ACTIVITIES LISHED D. Planning for alternative Was of transportation ~ 1. Prepare a master plan Frank Robbins September for pedestrian and Steve Brinkman 1991 I~ bikeways Jerry Clark = 2. Monitor the development Harry Persaud ongoing G; of mass Transportation Catherine Tuck systems in the region ti { I r ~ ~ 4th i 11)Es 1 r. ~ .~......ro:....carat..i..:wJ.e1NNyYw•.M1AL>auvilFJY•.r-v.s N 1 r S Y r Goal: Analyze Development Process Team Leader: Frank Bobbins Charge: i To evaluate and improve Denton's development process. i I py' { II 4 i 10180 i i Ike i Date: January, 1991 Page 1 of 6 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: DEVELOPMENT PROCESS r t IMPLEMENTATION TEAM: Frank Robbins, Chair Robbie Baughman David Selman ~ Bob Hagemann Owen Yost Glenn Fisher Glen Gary Olivia Corson Bob Tickner Karen Feshari Goal Statement: All development cases processed within 60 days. The development process is preceived to be easier, less expensive, faster, and effectively implements the Denton Development Plan. 1 OBJECTIVE/TASK ' ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY I ACCOMP- I RESULTS 1 IM ACT ONTBUDGET AND/ CURRE LISHED I f A. Educate public, real estate business, mortgage companies, title companies, developers, utility companies about development procedures and P standards, 1. Develop a comprehensive Owen Yost March, No Not completed 31,ODO printing costs development packet to be 1990 denied in budget. available in all develop- Xerox budget too tor. ment related departments. 2, Conduct "how-to' semi- DRC Next Yes Ongoing { r nars for staff and April, ; developers, 1991 i{ 3. Publish a Quarterly Owen Yost Yes Ongoing $l D0/year copying and newsletter for postage costs. development interests. NEW: Add nefphborhood presidents January, 1991 to mailing list. 1136e/26 r 1. ~~MdA%1NMi1itY9~YlLLafu4,td 1e4+luvLv. _ .uY,..aW+*+wX+.r..rs-.,....._....• . I . r-• 4 ~ 1 Page 2 of 6 Date: January, 1991 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO I NEEDED BY ACCOMP- I RESULTS I IM CURREMTBUDGET AND/ I r IISHED l 4. Seek publication of Owen Yost ongoing Yes None dde elopeent related Hobble Baughman in oreation in the paper. Seek input from paper on format. NEW: NU class to assist frank Robbins July '91 to development of G ad campaign. 5. Insure an open DAL Ongoing Yes Insure that develop- WON f dialogue with develop- city Staff eent is reviewed Bent Interests. Improve expeditiously but consistency, timeliness stets local ds development and detail of review. standards. . Help define mutual problem arses. I ongoing Yes Improve City image and gone 6. Institute a DRC case DRC shorten processing time. follow-up program. A DAC rep w111 call developers back after k s'` DRC meeting. j None 1. Anticipate potential DRC Ongoing Yes o^ appllcInform- Issues and problems earlier. associated with sub- sequent steps In the { process and commuei- I' Cate that to applicants. 1138e/27 f I i I _,........w+wasa..w.ww+i+x'r~~.4«,~« w.-a ,w+- r ~ 1► ~ r Page 3 of 5 Date: January, 1991 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PAIOAITY: DEVELOPMENT PA_OCE55 IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSiGNEO TO I NEEDED RESULTS BY ~1SN 0' I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES 1 9. Streamlining Ongoing Ease the process for 1. Continue regulatory pgC Frank Robbins a proving development streamlining program. Jackie Doyle which is in accord with the Denton Development Plan and City code. Shorten review of plats. Staff time saving. 2. Consider eliminating Front Robbins Fell 1989 S90 annual copying council from plat review briefings cost savings. process during review of completed. committee subdivision rewrite formed. . f s process. August, 1990. Consideration: Adopts Spring, 1991. xpwe 1 Prellactabl ,1ttyr. I 3. Consider a streamlined site Frank Robbins Winter 1991 Shorten costa, area review None plan review process in the 1 toning rewrite as in alter- native to the existing PO R Process. New: Adopt new type planned development and conditioned toning district. 1138e/28 1 j i i w ~ a 6 ~ Page 4 of 6 Date: January, 1991 PROGRESS REPORT CITY CPUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: DEVELOPMENT PROCESS I I OBJECTIVE/TASK ; ASSIGNED TO I NEEDEO BY I ACCOMP- LISHEO I RESULTS I CURRENT 11CSlYIT1EJ I 4. Analyze the impacts of DRC Ongoing Better lend None required procedures City Staff use regulations. standards, and exactions.` This analysis should insure a reasonable relationship between { the requirement and the development created need on its impact. This analysis will be rede when conducting re uletory stna+mlirtIng and regulatory ordi"nee development. 6. Provide maximum oppor- Staff ongoing yet Consensus None tunity for input by ` interested individuals and those that would be regulated when develop- ment regulatory amendments are being written. 6. Analyze DRC's submission ORC Yes No change needed deadlines, meeting dates, and scheJules. , I { ~ 1 i : 113Be/29 'r i I r a wm~ rs qs Date: January, 1991 Page 6 of 6 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OBJECTIVE/TASK 1 ASSIGNED TO i NEEDED BY 1 ACSONFEiPO- I RESULTS I O CURRENTBUDG YIT1E( I j I I I 7. Consider a re-DAC staff DRC Ongoing Urban Better applications None meeting on dead line" Planner time and effort saving. day to scrutinize and applications for secretary completeness. improve Make review. New S. Allow staff to approve Frank Robbins Spring 1991 Shorten review time. $60 annual copying minor plats and preliminary cost savings, plats. New 9, Eliminate requirement for Frank Robbins Spring 1991 Shorten, less expensive $34000-170600 less platting for many single development review, platting rewMK, tract developments extra- annually. territorial jurisdiction subdivision where infra- f structure is in place, I and minor building on unplatted property. New 10, bouble notice` zoning Karen Feshari February, 1991 Shorten zoning process None cases, Prepare zoning by 2.3 weeks. ordinance for Planning and Zoning meeting. i 113&/30 i t ~ i~ I~ i Date: January, 1991 Page 6 of 6 PROGRESS REPORT C17Y COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: DEVELOPMENT PROCESS [ OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO k NEEDED BY I! ACCOMP- RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND( k I I I LISHED I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES 4 C. Process Management } 1. Directors must continue Directors ongoing Yes Elfeinate confusion None to support delegated inconsistencies, and DRC members, poor image.` 2. Conduct semiannual DRC Chair Nov. 9, 1989 Yes Policy consistency. lane meetings between DRC, Completed Reinforced authority Directors, and the City Neat March, of DRC members. Manager to discuss the 1991 ` development process and development issues. 7. Conduct cross training DRC Chair Ongoing Yes Nora timely, comprehensive $26 copying costs and technical training and detailed staff assist- sessions with DRC ante to applicants. I members about special- fE i:ed standards. ` 1138e/31 n,,,.....,..__... _.........,..♦~•wrcWV,;Sk..,uFl9"tRy:~IH'cLM,s'.+i.w r•a. - . II r W Ir r I Goal: Downtown Development Team Leader: Jane Finley Charqe: To coordinate and promote activities in the central business district, `1. J I 1 ' A 1 i i i~ I f 10'90 4 r Date. January 18, 1991 Page 1 of 6 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION TEAM: Jane Biles, Team Leader Frank Robbins Nona Garner Bill Angelo Owen Yost Jackie Doyle Ralph Klinke John McGrane Paul Iwuchukwu OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO INEEDED BY ACCOMP- I RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I ' I ( I LISHED I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES 1. Apply for Urban Main Street Jane Biles 11/89 Accepted into program, Approximately 522,000 I designation from Texas increased services, in private funds raised C` Historical Commission. ability to hire to supplement existing additional staff, budget. 2. Establish Main Street Main Street 05/89 Resolution passed Advisory Board to advise Committee revitalization effortsding 2a. Establish Main Street Jane Biles 08/89 executive committee and additional comittees to address these specific issues= promotions, economic development, design, parking and consumer traffic, NEW 2b. Restructure Main Street Jane Biles 02191 Ensure long-term Task Force as Downtown management for Development Advisory downtown establish Board. closer liaison with Central Business 1 District Association, i 1138e ~ll 1 r I r F Date: January 18, 1991 Page 2 of 6 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT I OBJECTIVE/TASK J ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BYJ ACCOMP- RESULTS IMPACT ON 8UDGET AND/ J 1 I I 1 LISHED I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES 3. Solidify linkages with Jane Biles Ongoing 1. Retail business other organizations (such committee (C of C), as Greater Denton Arts 2. Assistance with Council, Chamber of research on funding Commerce, Central Business sources for GOAC District Association) that Performing Arts Center. i have a vested interest in 3. Increased membership the downtown area. in CBDA, facilitated that organizations aulicbtion for 5 (0 4. Coop efforts with Denton CVB to produce 5. Assistedsinrtrolley efforts - coordinated fund raising for j trolleys. I 4. Promote a positive Image Jane Giles Ongoing Coop ads in Record- for downtown Denton through Gayle Cates Chronicle, Denton Dollars, { marketing, media, and Promotions positive media relations, development of traffic Committee TV appearances, over building events, $3,500 in column inches l in newspaper coverage, raised 55,000 for newly formed Denton Arts festival, concerts on Square, County Seat Saturday, Holiday lighting, Victorian Christmas, Christmas parade, Dad's Downtown, Halloween on-the- Square, State School Welk-a-thou. 11380 -....,....;.-..«...wa.wt~a.W,14W.Y~fitJt;6tMFf~NS'hJJ'MW.N.Vro'wwrew.a::.. m,u Date: January 18, 1991 Page 3 of 6 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STPATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT i OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO INEEDED BYI ACCOMP- I RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ II I I 1 LISHED I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES 5. Assist on the promotion Jane 81les Ongoing Linkage established with of existing downtown Gayle Cates Denton Arts Festival, i events. County Seat Saturday 90, GTE Concerts on Square, ! Holiday Lighting, and other downtown events. u 6. Provide business assistance Jane Biles Ongoing 1. General Main Street to merchants in downtown Carolyn Birkhead Seminar area through seminars and 2. Visual Merchandising individual consultation. Seminar and consulta- tion I 3. Urban Main Street architect consulta- tions Cooperative efforts f with SmAll Business I Development Center j 7. Research alternative Frank Robbins 10/89 Pending additional financing options for Don Hill research of Economic development Representative Development Committee (56,;t enterprise zones from Finance business improvement districts tax increment financings j NEW 7e. Using research, develop Jane Bites 06/91 A public improvement tong-term institutionalized Don Hill district would ensure funding plan for district. Representative long-term management from Finance and funding for downtown development. f !1138e ~J 1 { r~ S s , s, Date: January 16, 1991 Page 4 of 6 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO (NEEDED BYI ACCOMP- I RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I 1 I I LISHED I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES k 8. Develop and promote a Jane Giles 06/90 Low interest loans for Promotion of such a financial incentive Ongoing facade rehab in the Main package could stimulate 3 resource package, promo- Street area now available, development. tion tax abatements, federal effort income tax credit architectural assistance i available through State Main Street Office. 8a. Research possibility of Jane Bites 06/90 Ongoing Possible if current establishing low interest program proves incentivest or interior successful. rehabilitation. 9. Study off-street and on- Jane Biles 05/91 Study currently being $600 raised from street parking and make and Main Street coordinated, Survey private sector to recommendations, Parking Comm. drafted with time line cover cost of for implementation set. survey, 10. Market second story conner- Barbara Ross Ongoing Present CDBG program does sions to housing, Jane Was not allow for use of funds. Four new residences have i been established, currently promoting market to property owners. 11, Develop master landscaping/ Owen Yost 08/90 Streetscape corner plans F streetscape plan for Urban Nona Garner coordinated with Main Street area including Matt Soltis Engineering. lighting, paving, street furniture, plantings, J and signaled 1138e 1 r' S ~ f III Date: January 18, 1991 Page 5 of 6 PROGRESS REPORT 1 CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOALIPR10RITY: DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT 1 I OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO (NEEDED BYI ACCOMP- J RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND J I I I LISHED I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES I NEW Ila. Market and coordinate Jane Biles 06/91 Downtown Cornerstones John McGrane 1 Program including setting David Ayers up acounts in finance, Streetscape biddicng project and Committee promoting paver sales. cf, 12. Complete a land use study Owen Yost 05/90 Completed marketing addressing existing and Nona Garner land use study showing potential land uses in the Matt Soltis commercial potential at + Urban Main Street area. Jane Bites ground level with a residential market at second story level. Retail recruitment brochure in progress. ! NEW 13. Develop retell Jane Biles 04/91 Promote positive, recruitment package. Matt Soltis professional commercial Wes Davis image for downtown. John Mayer Stephany Compton r Sharon Jeffries 14. Continue to bury utilities Ralph Klinke ongoing Utilities on Square buried $300,000 in CIP for lines in downtown area, (Ernie Tullos) work completed on Hickory entire community. Street, work begun on Oak Street. 15. Sustain the Central Jane Biles 10/89 Ongoing $3,000 pledged for 1991 Business District Asso- ciation's tangible support of the Main Street program. 1138e qrn....~_. ~.+rm..nre~ a.• ..c:u.:.an'+ii:.b'r~Ie fa un..wu.~ NMivYJA~MnIk IULMd4MMY'Y S b.r r .n. ~t s 4 ~ I l Date: Janaury 18, 1991 Page 6 of 6 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT `4 I I OBJECTIVE/TASK { ASSIGNED TO (NEEDED BYI ACCOMP- I RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I { LISHED I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES I s 16. Continue to4raise 5 private Jane Bites 10/90 Ongoing calendar wised for current second staff pos itTOn t David Bites year. 11. Educate merchants and Jackie Doyle 12/90 Survey Better communication between City Hall and ~ proper owners on fire Bob Hagemann completed downtown developers. prottect on and building j inspection issues. education ongoing NEW 18. Submitted six nominations Jane Bites 10/90 10/90 Won four statewide awards: for Texas Downtown 1. Best Promotional Event- Association Annual County Seat Saturday Awards Program. 2. Best Public/Private Venture Center for the Visual Arts 3. Lott Apirtment Ron Uthe Square 4. Downtown Business Person of the Year Geneva Berg 1 1138e 1 i 1 1 i Goal: Energy Issues Team Leader: Bob Nelson i Charge: To examine the Denton Municipal Electric Utility's rates and titivities with an emphasis placed on improving the delivery of 1 services. t~ 1 l: • I t ~ J f% 4 I: X 1 C i i 10180 i Y wry 1 Paye 1 of 11 Dates 01-30-91 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: ENERGY ISSUES IMPLEMENTATION TEAM: Bob Nelson. Team Leader Richard Foster Jim Thune Bruce Hennington Ernie Tulios ` IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ RESULTS k OBJECTIVE /TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY ACCOMP- OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES LISHED CITY FACILITIES/ISSUES Ongoing After payback, energy cost May receive 4% loans A. Efficient L.ghting Systems g.Hennington reduction for city facil- from state. Support ities of approx. 20♦ retrofits w/payback Reduced service center's of 3 yrs or less. 2nd Ploo[ lamps 504. 1. Low watt bulbs R.Foate[ 2, Remove some lights 3. Control lights to times when facility is ' occupied, 4. Use fluorescent/LED's for exit signs 5, Install skylights 6. Support high payout re- j placement programs r I B. Utilization of Offices Reduce energy costa. Could reduce htg/a/c 1. Develop higher occupancy lle on 10-1-91 Space study will costs in unused or min- A uses and concentrate ll s staff taff help dictate imally used rme/bldgs, Initial cap, needed but building uses R,FOater 1 2. Install automatic sight- B.Mennington 4"1'92 Dependin5 on budget I resources, payback 2-5 yrs, ing and heating/air conditioning controls 3. Education i awareness R,Foster Ongoing program for energy efficiency. 63420:14 I ~ . i 1 J 11 / I. ` YTM~ Page 2 of 11 Date: 1-30-91 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: ENERGY ISSUES i Team Leader Richard Foster Jim Thune Bruce Bennington IMPLEMENTATION TEAM: EBob rnie TullOs RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ NIEDED BY ACCOMP- OR C ASSIGNED TO CUP-RENT ACTIVITIES 4 OBJECTIVE/TASK LISHED CITY FACILITIES/ISSUES (cont'd) After payback, lower payback of 3 yra or C. Weatherization/Insulation B,Hennington 1-92 Ongoing less. energy costa for city: 1. Install double doors on All Depts facilities. City facilities Responsible for Solar screens bldg Solar screen installed 2. specifying at service center 3. Double windows conat 6 imprvmt 2nd Floor. Ceiling/wall insulation , 5. Install new high eff roof I on City Hall Provides monthly data Provided costs aware- ' D. Monitoring Energy Use R,Foatec Ongoing er, and other ness to used of I 1, Monitor electric 6 gad to Bldg. Op a suggestions on energy usage monthly# users on use, cost, and energy reduce energy 2. Feedback information to weather information. usage department users. 3. Review audit and report each building's use two As Requested. l j times a year. 4. Make recommendations ~44 for enhancements. I E. Heating/Air Conditioning Will reduce bldg, engy System operation B. Bennington ongoing use. k 1, Establish energy conser- vation temperature set Wil provide utility points. Completed in summer of bill rebates i save cycling air conditioning R. Foster 1999, 2. Instal ng devices on City substantial on TMPA Dmd. ~ sir conditioning units. 1 6342UIIS i r.,.a..w.a:e..bM :,caWw~:+w x.w Y..•<+„ i f S Page 3 of 11 Date: 1-30-91 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: ENERGY ISSUES IMPLEMENTATION TEAM: Bob Nelson, Team Leader RichRimard and Foster Bruce Hennington Thune Ernie Tullos RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ owwriVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY ACCCOMP- OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES f LISHED CITY FACILITIES/ISSUES (cont'd) Costs. R. Foster 6-1-90 Completed 3. Mandate air conditioning B. Bennington ~ compressor shut down on rotation during maximum electric system will provide long term peak. rt Sufficient main- Directors 6-1-90 Completed Budget constraints budget red. on red'd 4. suppuppo EXeC. Staff escalating engy costs. tenance budget for pro- per efficient operation City Council , and maintenance Budget constraints 5. Expand use of Energy B. Hennington 4-1-90 Meted Mgmt. System to Service 6-1-90 Center, MLK, Denia, t North Lakes, Powce P]t.r Fire stations, Power Plt, wwTP, Lift Stations, etc. ongoing Now participating in study funded by state F. Upgrade Heating/Air Con- to determine energy ditioning Facilities efficiency improvement that could qualify for 4% loan. 10-1-90 ongoing Completed on downtown will provide long term out all resis- B.Hennington complex. reduction in engY.oosts. 1. Change tance heating. g,Hernington 10-1-90 Ongoing 4 2. Replace/enhance existing inefficient heating air conditioning system w/maximum efficiency i as heating and 9 to 10 EER air conditioning units. I 63420 :16 _...v: I i I n n:, hw."~ 1 Date: 1-30-91 Page 4 of 11 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: ENERGY ISSUES IMPLEMENTATION TEAM: Bob Nelson, Team Leader Richard Foster Ernie Tullos Jim Thune Bruce Hennington OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY ACCOMP- RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ LISHED OR CURRENT_ ACTIVITIES CITY FACILITIES/ISSUES (cont'd) ~ G. Thermal Storage ongoing Need to increase Can help reduce summer incentives to obtain peak loads i dmd costs. participation. 1. Investigate value to E. Tullos City, including Elect- ric Department effect. H. Fleet Use i 1. Analyze use of natural J.Jarvie 8-1-91 Pilot Program scheduled gas or propane engines. for 19914 2. Encourage diesel All Depts. Ongoing Indications that this Engines on larger could lower fleet open. Vehicles coat. Nee feasibility f study firsts 1 3. Discourage Idling Individual j engines and other in- Department Ongoing Can reduce vehicle fuel efficient driver habits. use. 4. Develop educational Personnel material for City drivers. ii 1. City Policy/Procedures 1 Energy Effects on Citizens E S A. 1. Consider substations for E.Tullos 1-1-92 ongoing conduct study Improve customer E utility customer service A. Bingman service. 2. Analyze energy cost of ? City distribution of gar- C.Watkina 1-1-92 ongoing Conduct study Improve customer i bage bags vs present service. centralized distribution. 6342U:17 . / d Date: 1-30-91 PROGRESS REPORT Page 5 of 11 CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY; ENERGY ISSUES IMPLEMENTATION TEAM: Bob Nelson, Team Leader Ernie Tullos Richard Foster Jim Thune Bruce Hennington I ~ f OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BYJ A000MP- RESULTS LISHED OR IMP UTILITY DEPARTMENT ACT ON BUDGET AND/ CURRENT ACTIVITIES i A. General Z. Analyze all of Denton's Bob Nelson electrical department E.Tullos 10-1-91 ongoing PUB working w/Utility Opttmi2e O&M Costs 1 capital 6 O&M costs. Div.Mgrs. Staff to develop perfor- formance measuring system. 8. Future Power Supply 1. Explore future power Bob Nelson 4th Qtr f supply strategies 6 1992 A PUB Mgmt. study will focus opportunities, on long range strategies for achieving low cost elec. elec. energy for Din. Reduced electric rates 10/1/89. 2. Explore all alternatives B. Nelson ~ fors 1'42 E, Tulloa Long range elec. cost to Total Production cost. as future pwr supply J. Thune customer. b. Wholesale pwr. i c. Participation w/TMPA III d. Participation w/others e. Self generation. I C. TMPA 1. Encourage TMPA to take Bob Nelson all steps posaib?e to Ongoing TMPA has continued to lower fixed costa, increase production With Comanche Peak settlement funds avall- operated below budget i trt able and Operating aur- mmed Eixed budget Plus funds, TMPA has re- costs for 189 and 19o. duced dmd, charges from 31.53/KW/mo.to $27.85 6342Ut18 on 5-1-89 and to $24 effective 1-1-1990 1 J r y . Page 6 of 11 Date! 1'30-91 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: ENERGY ISSUES IMPLEMENTATION TEAR: Bob Nelsons Team Leader Richard Foster Jim Thune Bruce Hennington Ern le Tulles ' CTIVITIES K ASSIGNED TO TjEDED BY ACCOMP- RESULTS IMPACU RRS CT ONTBUDGET AND/ l OBJECTIVE/TAS LISHED OR ACTIVITIES (UTILITY ISSUES (cont'd) C17' Bob Nelson 10-1-91 Ongoing All member cities to pay $800i0D0/yr in rates a. Investigate TMPA's Ray Stephens same unit cost (0/kwh) inequitable rate setting practices. Tom Harpool Reduce Denton's unit b. Investigate why 19-1-91 ongoing Reduce operating cost cost from TMPA by TMPA's Gibbons Creek Ray Stephens 300,000-400,900/yc. Plant requires 100 Tom Harpool more people for operations than an equivalent plant owned by Brazos Elec. Cooperative D. Council/Utility Board interaction 1. Establish quarterly Brd i Council Ongoing Better understanding of meetings goals 6 projects. utility Adm. Ongoing Better understanding of 2. Provide Council with goals 6 projects. all PUB Minutes Ongoing Frequent memos on Utility 3. Provide Council with Bob Nelson Issues included in 'The copies of 'Utility Week That Was' substituted Lines' for 'Utility Lines' communication. E. Power Production Division ~ Decrease Gen.Cap.6 cost/KWH EfE. Can only install after 1. Conduct feasibility atdy J.Thune 1993 Improve rejection of TMPA to investigate te merits of E.TUllos expansion proposal. ' installing gas turbine stag unit using existing boilers for heat recovery. 6342U:19 1 Page 7 of 11 Date: 1-30-91 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: ENERGY ISSUES IMPLEMENTATION TEAM: Bob Nelson, Team Leader Richard Foster Jim Thune Bruce Hennington Ernie Tullos t RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ HED OR CU~ENT A_CTIVITTES I_ OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY LIS COM UTILITY ISSUES (cont'd) Improve efficiency Reduce operating costs. 1-92 . Survey power plant for J. Thune 2 reductions in station C' service energy. 3. Install steam coils in J.Thune 7-91 Maintain hot standby sta- Reduce O&M costa mud drums of 2-600#000 tus for gen. while reduc'g energy 6 equip. main. costs. lb/hr boilers in order to elim, need for supplemtli firing during hot stdby periods. P. Solar Hot water ' 1. Reanalyze feasibility of E.TUllos 1-1-90 ongoing Conduct feasibility stdy Reduce customer energy developing a solar hot in light of elimination coats$ of solar tax credits/new Crater service. technology. G. Rates Need to keep rates t 1. Continue to perform Bob Nelson 10-1-91 equitable. cost of service studies. 2. Equity-Industrial vs Bob Nelson 10-1-91 Yes Decrease industrial rates Residential 3. Standby rate Legal 10-1-91 Change in rates for Cogene- ration 4. Economic Development Rate PUB 10-1-90 Yes 50i, 40%, 304, 201, 10% Encourage economic Reduction of demand charge development and for new Industries for customers on Denton's years 1, 2, 30 4 E 5 syeem. i b342U:20 M , owl A'r 1 Date: 1-30-91 Page 8 of 11 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: ENERGY ISSUES I IMPLEMENTATION TEAMS Bob Nelson# Team Leader Richard Foster Ernie Tulloa Jim Thune Bruce Hennington i I' OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY ACCOMP- RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ LISHED OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES UTILITY ISSUES icont'di 5. Develop more aggressive Howard Martin 1-90 10/90 Reduce peak demand Decrease TMPA pwr coats time-of-use rate E. Tullos 6. Develop and promote a full 1-92 Reduce peak deamdn Decrease TMPA pwr costs scale interruptible rate C and/or special/specific rates for customers with a zero peak hour use. H. Cogeneration 1. Work with TWU on their Bob Nelson Ongoing UNT temporarily on hold w/ congeneration proposal their cogeneration program, TWU initiating cogeneration, coat to Denton ratepayers is $500,000 per year. Standby rate required. 2. Promote cogeneration and/ E. Tullos 1-1-92 Ongoing Customers for such steam Improve production or steam heat for indus- use are limited facility utilization trial parks next to the Power Plant I, Energy Management Is Continue strong support Bob Nelson Ongoing Several programs adopteds of the City's ongoing E, Tullos 1. High efficiency A/C i Reduce peak load and ESP* effort and encourage Heat pump rebates TMPA fixed costs Re- specific projects to be 2. Peak dmd red program duce customer coat undertaken in each of the 3. A/C cycling program City's departments 4. Time-of-use rates *Energy Services Planning 6342US21 f t I 1 1 1 1 ' e Page 9 of 11 Date: 1-30-91 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: ENERGY ISSUES IMPLEMENTATION TEAM: Bob Nelsono Team Leader Richard Foster Jim Thune Bruce Hennington Ernie Tullos RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ 4 OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY ACCOMP- OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES ll LISHED UTILITY ISSUES (cont'd) Ongoing Regular newspaper and Reduce customer cost 2. Promote awareness of the Elect Dept advertising programs ESP concept within the Bob Nelson community R. Foster 3. Investigate and catalog R. Foster Ongoing Concentrate effort on proven programs ESP projects that have ` been successful in other communities and that are working for customers w/ In the City of Denton at the present time Ms have legal restrlc- 4. set up a revolving fund R. Foster 10-1-91 ongoing Qes{ee customer energy tion-cash flow and to loan money to Resider- administration costs tial customers for insula- tion, weatherization and 1 energy efficient home im- provements Improve energy awareness 5, Establish a speaker's Bob Nelson 10-1-91 ongoing Energy Mgt. staff have bureau Win the City that would be available to give been speaking to groups efficiency. upon request, Plai to 1 talks on energy established speakers, Need to include several people w/in the City, not just Energy Management 6. Energy Management Service A. Foster 4-1-91 ongoing eBetter nergy management efforts Bob Nelson with utility A new intern has recently a. Add person to be Energy been added to staff and is Management for our major still in training as of ' industrial customers 1/23/91. 6342W22 5 I J "1 fir.--- ~ - -r ~-w~ t 1 naw~ r.s S, Date: 1-30-91 Page 10 of 11 PROGRESS REPORT v CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: ENERGY ISSUES IMPLEMENTATION TEAM: Bob Nelson, Team Leader Richard Foster Ernie Tullos Jim Thune Bruce Hennington OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO i+EEDED BY ACCOMP- RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ LISHED OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES UTILITY ISSUES (cont'd) i 7. Encourage a high school R. Foster 9-1-91 Ongoing Increase citizen awareness j level conservation seminar and awareness program.: This could also be extended to the elementary school level 8. Continue to monitor the Elect Dept Ongoing Increase effectiveness Investigate feasibility technological development of new programs in the area of load mgmt and time-of-use metering possibilities via cable TV or other communication mediums and be placed to i initiate programs when such i become economically feasible r 9. Continue development of Bob Nelson Ongoing 2500 units in service, Reduce peak load by possible air conditioning anticipate additional 500 1500 RW in 1990, load mgmt control program in 1991 i' j ) f i 1 ~ 6342U:23 r I 1 ,r w~ hug Date: 1-30-91 Page 11 of 11 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAID i GOAL/PRIORITY: ENERGY ISSUES IMPLEMENTATION TEAM: Bob Nel..on, Team Leader Richard Foster Ernie Tullos Jim Thune Bruce Hennington OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY ACCOMP- RESULTS IMPACT 09 BUDGET AND/ LISHED OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES rr i f COMMUNITY ISSUES A. Building Codes Can save citizens of Denton substantial long 1. Strongly press for high- Bldg Code Increase energy efficiency term energy costs for C, er efficiency standards Board of new buildings. Lower minimal upfront capacity in codes utility costs for customers costs. Often the in- crease in mortgage pmts a. Resistance heating are more than off set b. Energy/square feet use by reduced energy costs standard c. Insulation values d. Bldg envelope energy 1 use 1 e. Bldg orientation f. Double pane wiodows ' I g• Fireplace design I h. Landscaping r i B. Traffic Pattern/Street Designs/Zoning Issues 16 Include energy use cal- Public Works ongoing Much work has already been Can save citizen vehicle ► culation in setting Eng/Planning been done to computerize i fuel cost ` traffic signals timing improve flow of traffic. } j 2. Include energy use cal- Also results in cleaner air `E culation in designing street systems EE 3. Include energy use in f zoning considerations i 6312U:2/ 1 i j M `i.\ r I 4 1 Goal: City Beautification Team Leader: Cecile Carson R Charge: To evaluate and recommend programs that will improve the ` appearance of Denton. I r i i i 1 i 1 + Y } 1 10160 h, f' wq M' r y Date: 01/18/91 Page 1 of S / PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: CITY BEAUTIFICATION I7 IMPLEMENTATION TEAM: Cecile Carson# Team Leader Bill Angelo Owen Yost David Salmon Nona Garner Dave Ham Joe Morris Bob Tickner Ernie Tullos OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY ACCOMP- RESULTS IMPACT CN BUDGET AND/ j LISHED OA CUARF;NT ACTIVITIES I 1. Continue to monitor and Cecile Carson Ongoing Improve service delivery. Additional personnel I analyze Code Enforcement may be justified* activities. 2. Make tie-in to Denton Code Enforce- May 1991 To access property Undetermined at Appraisal District and ment and owner information. this time obtain access to their Planning The lack of maps data* corresponding to new tax system is making property research difficult. < 3. Monitor effectiveness of Steve Brinkman Ongoing Evaluation of policy va. No land or money park dedication policy, an ordinance. has been received since the policy was implemented. 4. Proceed with programs for a citizen clean-upi a. Expand the litter Cecile Carson Ongoing Oct.'89 Three cleanups have been Cost benefit ' round-up program to April 190 held. Glad Bags will for Oct. 90 E include local busi- Oct. 190 be a major sponsor of showed that for each f nesses and citizens, for spri1g2clean scheduled 41 spent 417 6 i 11I 1138e/42 i l r i y 0'r" do w~ 4. J Date: 01118191 page 2 of S PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: CITY BEAUTIFICATION i I OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY ACCOMP- RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I LISHED OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES i b. Continue monthly Cecile Carson Ongoing Council presents awards Certificates beautification Nona Garner, March to November. 3 to rlnted at awards program. Owen Yost, 5 awards presented each 2 per certificate month to businesses and residences. C. Establish an annual Cecile Carson Yearly May 1991 Encourage and recognize Individuals and award program. Beautification individual and corporate businesses will be Commission beautification projects, asked to sponsor r' tables. ! • d. Adopt-A-Spot Cecile Carson Ongoing First Encourage groups and Increased awareness NEW Goals Committee phase city divisions and depts. and feeling of ownership BeaulElcatlon epril 191 to clean areas 4 times of public property will I Commission each year. Program might ultimately reduce replace Employee Litter litter crew workload and Round-up, improve lnage of the city. S. Expand and promote Bill Angelo Ongoing Curbside Reduce volume of waste Additional equipment f recycling activities. Cecile Carson evaluated going Into landfill, and supplies will be Charlie Watkins Spring Dropoff- News 1,616 tons, requested to continue f 091 glass 62 tons, office paper to expand program. +J 37 tons through NOV, and A 20,000 grant was J Christmas trees 11093 received last year to expand dropoff sites, • Refers to new programs 1138e/43 I I I s _ .i_ r4 Y.T.:v N.K. .J 4Yw'n~ 5.... s.fdr..y . 1 1 Dates 01/18/91 Page 3 of 5 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: CITY BEAUTIFICATION OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY ACCOMP- RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ LISHED OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES 6. Implement 'Waste in Nona Garner Ongoing April 191 Twenty-four visits were Donations will be Place' (WIP)and 'Waste a Beautification made by Mother Nature and requested to place ; Hidden Resources' (WAHR) Commission Pour visits were made on 'WAHR' in 7-12 grades, in schools. recycling. Donations from businesses were used to 1 provide 'WIP' to all f DISD K-6 teachers. !!1 ~ ♦ ltiJ Analyze and update Cecile Carson Second Brat Provide the maximum Unknown at this time. 7' Litter Ordinances Joe Morris phase phase ability to prevent An administer fee of 484 Sept. 191 Fall 190 littering4 to cover removal trash j was added in '90. i F Be Consider 'dump free' Bill Angelo This item has been diecusa- Unknown at this time# day at the landfill ed for some time and no or alternatives per action has been taken. request by the Goals committee recommends t Beautification increased publicity of Task Force. special pick-up program and placement of dumpeters in in residential areas at various times throughout the year. j 9. Beautification of City f}k facilitiees a. Landfills Subatations, Dave Ham, Ongoing Landscaping of EHS building Additional funding Water Plants Sewer Bill Angelo, has been completed. Trees will be needed to Planto Wells, Fire Bruce have been planted at Fire landscape other Stationa, etc... Hennington, Station on Sherman and at facilities. Bob Tickner, Traffic Control Building. Tom Shaw Trees were donated to Ernie Tullos plant at landfill, 1138e/61 i i I . I~. i Date: 01/18/91 Page 4 of 5 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: CITY BEAUTIFICATION I OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY ACCOMP- RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I + LISHED OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES a. Service Center Bob Nelson Ongoing Landscaping of building Funding may be Goals Committee and impro~!ng overall necessarya, appearance. 10. Continue underground Ernie Tullos Ongoing More attractive CiP budgeted items installation of electric streetscapes i service. { C17. 11. Trash receptacle program. Cecile Carson, Ongoing Cleaner streets, Receptacles are sold Beautification sidewalks, and public to sponsors for 4150 Commission properties. each. 12. 'Certified City' status Cecile Carson May 1990 Detailed information, 4300 per year in Keep America Beautiful Beautification resource materials, and Commission trainers have been provided. F ' { 13. Apply for 'Governor's Cecile Carson April 191 April 093 $100,000 award received Staff time to Community Achievement Award' Beautification in 19900 and Communication prepare appli- and other awards Commission award cations. 14. Complete Entranceway Plans. Caen Yost, 1991 Coordinate design for 410000 for visualar Beautification major entranceways to printing. Commission city. Improve city's image. { 1138e/45 i ' i I w Y Dates 01/18/91 Page 5 of 5 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY; CITY BEAUTIFICATION OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY ACCOMp- RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ LISHED OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES i 15. Prepare landscape or Dave Salmon Ongoing University Drive plans Funding from CIP will improvement plans for Goals Committee have been completed and run out this year. entranceways and other Highway Department will Right-of-Way areas. begin work in 191-192. Dallas Drive from Rio Grande to Wolfe'a Nursery construc- tion to start in 191. Teasley from I35E to Lillian Miller plans have been submitted to the Highway Department. I~I At Avenue A and Fry, the triangle will be landscaped. i~ . j *16, Explore expanded use of Nona Garners Ongoing Clean up specific Staff time to coordinate V NEW probationers and other use Bob Tickner, areas and public project. I i groups to do special Cecile Carson Properties, Olean-ups. r 1 *17. Tree City USA Owen Yost, April 191 Promote planting of trees No new expenditures NEW Releaf Denton Cecile Carson in the city, increased recognition for the city, f and assist in KTB awards. *16. Consider development of Nona Garner, Spring 192 Beautification and Staff time to coordinate NEW Denton Blooms Festival Bob Tickner, publicity for the city project. Fundraisers Cecile Carson will be used to purchase { bulbs. i ~ i *19, Increase street sweeping Bill Angelo Ongoing Cleaner streets increased coat for NEW providing service. 1136*/41 I .-.v....,~ueu H.v F4HpI.WW1i.iwWt..+.anw.~.-ii i.. ,I NM:ex i~5afu 1i I 1 Ni 4 f Goal: Financing operations i Team Leader: John McGrane Charge: j To develop and implement a schedule for the annual budget l review that is both realistic in its timetable, and straightforward in its presentation. i k I i i loleo N r r I CITY COUNCIL Sffective Date! 01/15/91 Relative Laws: FY 1991-92 BUDGET CALENDAR Revision A is 01/22/91 Texas Property Tax Code (See. 26) PSBRUARY 1991 City Charter (Seo. 8) MONDAY TUESDAY ~ WSMSDAY TNURSDAY {jj FRIDAY 218A-- TUESAY I'___LUND 1 I I I I I II I 1 I I I 146j 111 B` i3l I L c+ 1 l ! I 4 { I I I 1 1 11 ILI 1141 Iul OP62 Commission{ I 1 I I I public hearingl I I I to receive l I 1 on oomun tyy I I 1 I in1 CI 22~ I?~1 y ~1TI I A I *City Council I I I I I briefing on I i I CIP process ` t I I I j1staff capital ICI I I I I I I budget kick- I I 1 j I I I off (General I I I ; I Government) I 1 ....mw~N.t. xx•+K~Yiob• Y 9~ 1 a I CITY COUNCIL FY 1991-92 BUDGET CALENDAR MARCH 1991 1 SUNDAY I MONDAY I TUESDAY I WEDNESDAY I THURSDAY I I FRIDAY 12~SATURDAY Ili I ~ II `I ~ 3 ~ i i i I I , Al 81 61 `sl 181 181 I i FT- Iii 1111 121 Iii i3Sl ICI i OInitisl distribution of budioti priorities city counoil for Polley input I I ~ j I l luS I~~ 1~1 1201 61 , ?dl 1~3.i IICI I;~I i3Ql , j I i ; I l i i l 1 i j _ ! , 'IkW ` s i L 1 CITY COUNCIL FY 1991-92 BUDGET CALENDAR APRIL 1991 I SUNDAY I` MONDAY I I TUESDAY I I WEDNESDAY I THURSDAY I I FRIDAY I `SATURDAY l I I I?I I.~I ICI ~ 6I I ~ 1 'Staff oper- ] *Council re- 1 ! I ! ating budget J turns completed) ! I 1 ktck-oft 1 budget prior- I I I I I (General I ties question- I I I ! I y I Government) I naire J I I S E! I I I I I I I I I I l l I ~ c ICI ICI ICI 1141 113.1 I12! 1331 ! NPUS final con-I I I I I I I I sideration of I I I I I I I I Utility CIP ! I I ] II I I I I I Ili) 1351 ~~I 11Ti 132I 1241 I I 'Executive I'Budget Priori- I *PUB final consideration and Comittee CIP I ties question- recommendation of Utility CIP 1 ] presentations 1 naire results 1 (tentative) I I I 1 I distributed to 1 'Executive Cosmittee General I I I r Council ; Government CIP discussions I I: I'City Council I I I I I I I 211 121 I operating bud- 1231 1251 126 12Y I I I get discussional I E I I J with City I I, I ! s Attorney and I I I I ! E Municipal Judge] I I I 1 j2!! ;24i l34i 4 ~ ' ! E j i i I _I s CITY COUNCIL FY 1991-92 BUDGET CALENDAR ` MAY 1991 i_ SUNDAY I MONDAY I TUESDAY I WEDNESDAY I THURSDAY I MNDAY I SATURDAY i 111 I?I 1-11 131 I I I I I I I I I E 1 I I 1 1 I I I I ~ i I l I j~I 141 I ZI 141 141 1141 IuI IIj 1 I I *Presentation of revenue ! ! I projection I I I I E I to city I I I I I I I I Manager I I I j I I I I I 111 )131 Isl 11~ I I161 11TI I>41 I I *All operatingi I "Preliminary I I I I I I budget re- I I roll due from 1 I I I I I quests due I I DCAD I I I I r Office I I I I I I i l I i I I ! I I i I i I I I ~ 1141 Nil 111 I_2I 1331 1111 133! 1 I I I "City council I *P&z Commission) *Staff I i I I I I budget discus- I final consider-I Executive I I I I sions regarding) ation of CIO I Committee I { w I I human services I (tentative) i operating E i I I I and transpor- I I budget I I 1 I tation I I Dresontatione I I I { I I I I I I I I I i t i ~3~1 ~7~1 X341 ~~1 1341 1311 $Executive I I I I Memorial I I Committee I II !I I( Holiday operating Hol : I I t budget 1 ! ` 1 discussions I I I ' I I ~ , 41 CITY COUNCIL FY 1991-92 BUDGET CALENDAR JUNG 1991 SUNDAY MONDAY TUB$DAY SI6DN68DAY THU D Y RIDAY 1319AT AY l ~ I I 131 ICI 16I 111 IAI 131 ICI I I I I I I I I I I I s 141 1141 1111 111 IDI I1AI IJUI s 1 { I 1 I ~ I I I I ` I 'i > 01 111 1111 11$I 141 1 1~1{ i31 I CIP Presenta- tion to City Council for ! ( , I I I consideration I (tentative) ` ~ I 1 I IZ11 IZi1 ICI I• I 1291 1331 I I 1261 IsZI I #Submit "Major I Budget Issues I 1 I Report" to II I I I City Council { I 1 { I I I i L ) I I , 1 w `i\ r 1 • S CITY COUNCIL PY 1991-92 BUDGET CALENDAR JULY 1991 I SUNDAY MONDAY I TUESDAY I WEDNESDAY ! THURSDAY I FRIDAY I SATURDAY 1 ICI 1 21 I.~I IAI ICI IA1 I I I I 'Review "Ka)or l ! 1 Budget Issues Report" with Council ! I 1 I j j I I I I I I! I I I! I I I ' -21 1LOI Illl ~L21 1331 ! 1 I 1 I I 1 l 62, I I 1 I I i I 1 ~ I I I I 1 ~I ICI ICI Ile1 1141 ICI 1 l 'Discussion of "6ajor Budget I 1 I Issues" Report I I } I I i 'NotelMotel Tax recipient I I l 1 budget presentations I I f I ICI 1331 I9AI ICI I.26I ICI I I I I I I ~ ~ i I ~ ~ ! I I iI ~ f r I I I f I I I I 1 ~ i ~ ~ 131 1241 130_1 1311 I j 1 "submit pro- I l 1 1 1 posed budget tol 1 II I I City Council$ I 1 I I budget discus- l 1 1 sions begin l I I ! I I I I i •7 r r CITY COUNCIL 1 rY 1991-92 BUDGET CALENDAR AUGUST 1991 SUNDAY I MONDAY I TUESDAY I WEDM9SDAY THURSDAY I FRIDAY I SATURDAY I ill I i I I 'DCAD submits certified rolli I by this date ' I j I I I I I 'Submission of effective and I I I roll-back tax rates to Council I I I I I I 'Staff budget presentations I I I to council I I I I i t I I I I I I I I I 1 ~ lul I1;<I 131 I~il ,141 111 I1Zi ~ I! I I I I I I I I I - I I Il$I 1141 ICI ICI 1221 I;'3.1 f;<41 { I 'Staff budget I presentations I I I to Council ~ I- I I I I I I ( ICI ICI ICI We ICI InI ICI I 'Approval of I Hotel/Motel I I Tax recipient i budgets. i 'Council budget) f study I I I M CITY COUNCIL FY 1991-92 BUDOIT CALINDAR SIPIDGER 1991 l_ SUNDAY I MONDAY I TUBgDAY I uIDN63DAY I THURSDAY I FRIDAY f SATURDAY LAI I ~I 111 j I Publio hearingl Ibl i I 1 l regarding tax ! iJ 1 i rate and pro- I I l posed budget i i 1 1 l I 1 1 l l 1 l 1 1 l l 1 , !~I l141 ~~I Ll 1 ~ ~ 1 I II 'Final Council 1 l budget study l 1 1 (tentative) ; j 1 pug 1 11 141 f3~1 ~ I l 'City Council final budget consideration I I 'Adoption of tax rats, oper- 1 ! E ating and capital budgets !I 1' i3 61 Z$ I 1 II 1f ~ 1 l j ~ ~ ~ i 1 % s6oar ~ 1 I i 1 I 1 Goal: Improve city Image Team Leader: Jesus Nava, Jr. Charge: To develop programs and activities that will create a more positive image for the City of Denton. G; :l i , 1 ~ y I i f MOO f i S Dates 01/18/91 Page 1 of 5 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITYt IMPROVE CITY IMAGE IMPLEMENTATION TEAMI Jesus NaVa, Jre, Team Leader Mark McDaniel Catherine Tuck Ralph Klinke Jeanette Scott Bob Tickner Charlie Watkins Betty Wilkins Mary Ann Stout Jane Finley F OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY ACCOMP- RESULTS - IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I P( LISNED OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES A. Develop motto or mission Executive staff Yes Slogan and mission No impact statement statement have been incorporated in all ; departments. i Be Publicize the slogan and mission statement 1. Develop action plan All Departments Yes Action plena received No impact from all departments reviewed by the implemen- tation team, and returned. 2e implement action plan All Departments Ongoing Action plane being Activities are being y~ implemented. A sixth carried out at the month status report has department levels j been submitted, minimal budget impact € 3s Awards program for Implementation 5/91 Ongoing Team award to most minimal impact dept./divo that Team successful dept./div* f successfully ample- has been delayed. € mented action plan i t C. Develop employee Personnel Yes New Employee Ori•3ntation Minimal impact i orientation program program developed. f Includes presentation by II City Manager, discussion r about quality service and a slide presentations I s♦ 1138. y I I r~ 1 1 Date1 01/18/91 Page 2 of 5 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY1 IMPROVE CITY IMAGE OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY ACCOMP- RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ i LISHED OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES P I {I{ 1. Establish guidelines city manager's Yea Request for Action process Minimal impact I for dealing with Office developed and implementeds citizens 2. Continue Customer Personnel Yes Annual in-house sessions Service and citizen scheduled for June 13-14 relations training and August 15-16. r, 3. Toward excellence Personnel Yea Available to managers and costs charged to training program supervisors FY 90-91 participating budget. Progrsm scheduled departmentso for July and August. Inclusion of accounts- Personnel/ Yes presently being monitored Minimal impact bility on employees' Departments/ by Personnels performance evaluation Divisions D. Establish more convenient Mark McDaniel Yes Hours extended during No impact. Flax time hours for Customer Service student hook-up periods, utilized to prevent workday hours expanded additional costs to 6 p.m, and Saturdays associated with t 11 a0m.-1 p.m, overtime. I i E. Ensure that citizen complaints are addressed promptly and effectively. i 1. Revise the telephone Gary Collins Yes Revised annually. No impact book listings Tom Shaw i I 1138e F y N W EEE I,r I 1 Date= 01/18/91 Page 3 of 5 I PROGRESS REPORT I CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITYS IMPROVE CITY IMAGE OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY ACCOMP- RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ LISHED_ OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES i 2. External and internal Bob Tickner 7/90 Yea Directional signs placed minor impact j facility signage Charlie Watkins at all City facilities. I Bruce Henington City Hall signs painted Mark McDaniel in Januarys 1991. David Ham Bill Angelo G" ~ i 36 Job line Tom Klinck Yea Job Line telephone minimal impact employment inquiry service now available. Receive feedback on performance a. 'Let's hear about Catherine Tuck Yea Routinely sent out as a Minimal Impact 4 it' follOV-Up to RPAso f I ~ f b, feedback tool for Mark McDaniel Yea Forme developed and sent divisions - City Charlie Watkins to divisions as exampleso wide c. Bi-annual citizen Catherine Tuck "Zm Cut from PY 90-91 budget, survey will be proposed in rY 91-92 budget. 5. Implement division Tom Klir:ck No Deferred) will incorporate tour programs partici- with other training pative orientation, and activities. re-orientation Ps Ensure that cmployees { are sensitive to citizen's perception. I I 1138e ' ' j I i I 1 i Deter 01/18/91 Page / of S PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: IMPROVE CITY IMAGE OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY ACCOMP- RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ LISHED OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES 11 Pecognize employees who Catherine Tuck Ongoing Increased employee morale Minimal impact exhibit excellent through recognition of job s customer service, well done. C,': 2. Counseling/professional Personnel Ongoing Sensitivity training I development sessions scheduled for Executives in February, 19911 Affirmative Action plan has been updated# Toward Excellence training { continues. 0. Educate citizens about the way services are provided. 1. Produce a citizen Jesus Nava No Newsletter cut from newsletter or FY 90-91 Proposed Budget* magazines 2s Produce weekly Jesus Nava Ongoing 42 articles have been No impact newspaper column prepared and published $City Views.' in the 1990 Sunday editions. 3. Incorporating City City-wide Yea motto appears in all City No impact motto in newspaper ads, ads. /s Investigate the insti- Operations Yes Report filed. Program Anticipate a positive tution of a volunteer Analysis/CMO being implemented on a impact on both the program departmental basis, budget and activities 1 1138e 1 i w { ry v. r~ 1 Dater 01/18/91 Page 5 of 5 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORiTYt IMPROVE CITY IMAGE OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY ACCOMP- RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ LISHED OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES 5. Annual performance Finance Yea Preparedp but not published report because of a lack of funds, will be reconsidered during 1991-92. 6. Toura and exhibits of Appropriate Yea This will occur upon Budgetary impact is City Hall and other departments opening of new City dependent upon the city facilities facilities$ event 7. Institute Yoith in Catherine Tuck Yea Held in January, 1991) Minor impact Government Program will be conducted annually. 8. Develop elide show Administration Yes continually being used in Minor impact about basic City council New Employee Orientation operations sessions. NEW 9. Chamber of Commerce Jesus Nava Yea Questions posed by Chamber minor impact Breakfast forum membership are answered :)y city staff. NEW 10. City of Denton Town Jesus Nava Yea staff presents City Minor impact Hall Meetings issues to general public i in a discussion forum. ! One meeting to date. i i j 11380 It _.._..................~aef,....J;i44kw;who.~r...u...; _ . _ 1 14 { c f Doal: User Fees Team Leader: 1 David Ham Charge: To evaluate the City of Denton's user fees to insure that they are both adequate for the cost to provide the service and be competitive with other cities in the region. CZI i 10180 j ~ i 1 II t 1 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN NALMjQRI7Y: USER FEES IMPLRHENT1TiON TEAM: C. David Ilam, Team Leader Harry Persaud Gary Malhesou Jerry Clark Paul Leslie Carol Weller i Bill Angelo Joe Islenti Bob Hngemann Cecile Carson Rodney Patterson 48LEDTIYEILA~K i AM4YE AQ ItiEEDED BYIACCOMPL1SMEr i BLVITS I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/OR C'UBRi'147 ACTIVMCI I A. Survey i Record Glenn Jaspers 2/87 Yea Glenn surveyed &I] None All city User Fees City department for their user fees 11/88 - 2/81 C B. Staff Review of C. David Ham 3/2/89 Yes staff will await None Survey Results ! Glenn Jaspers results of NTCOG Development of Joe Islenti Denton Fee Survey Survey Update nvailable 3/9 and use as basis for Procedure fee report C. Team Meeting to Fee Users Team 3/10189 Yes Individual members Possibly ies will review all User Feel appear Deserts N current user fees not to have been E Report 6 Other User Fee Info/ and submit changes/ revised is 2 yrw additions hack to for inflation or Formulate Procedure Committee on 1/21/89. other reasons. NTCOO survey will be 'r revised after refine- ment of new users fee data. D. Team Meeting Fee Users Teem 4/21/89 Yes Committee met 4/21/89 Scheduled to and reviewed progress Review all Current to data. Some depart- and New Fees. ments hs%e not turned in their fee revisions. Revisions mast be lurned in by nest meeting. { 6. Tram Meeting Fee Users Team 11/28189 Yes Committee met 11/28/89 IEIEIE Scheduled to and reviewed fees. Some Review all Departments are still Current and revisingq reel, but will N.rw Feex. submit finals by i1/70/89. i 1 1 3 rr , i Q6IECTIkELIASlI I esslallEQ~4 :SEEDEp_IfYI.ACDliPLIsM I BESSiLlS I F. Team Netting IMPACT ON fiuoaFr Fee User Teem 1/3/91 Yee Committee Met 1/3/91 None Schedules to to review tees. Review i Dept's will submit Update Fees revised lees by l/l6, i E C. 2D11062. WC ' i 1 i l i i Goal: Improve Relations with Minorities Team Leader: Paulette Owens-Holmes i 1 r ~ 1 Charge: To analyze and formulate a work plan which will facilitate open { communications between the City and Denton's minority committee. i 11W R, . 11 t , p; 1 10180 ! s Date: 01/16/91 Page I of 6 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: IMPROVE RELATIONS WITH MINORITIES { IMPLEMENTATION TEAM: Paulette Owens-Holmes, Team Leader Bill Brown j John Cook Michael Jez 1 Tom Klinck John McGrane I 1 I I i I I i I OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO (NEEDED BYI ACCOMP- I RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I I I LISHBD I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES I c A. Participation of City in celebration of some special days 1. Develop a proposal that Bill Brown Yes Policy developed to obefve Direct impact 0-1 General G would look at the Personnel Martin Luther King's fund feasibility of estab- birthdays Council passed lishing a 'Heritage and approved additional Day' which would allow holiday for all City for an annual event for employees various ethnic groups Be Move directly on Recce- The construction of Martin Direct impact on Patks ation Center Luther King Recreation and Recreation budget k center completed: grand I S opening was held Feb. 26 1. Meeting on Center Architect/staff Yes I 2. Begin schematic design Architect/staff Yee I ~ ~I 3. Public hearing to CDBG/Park Board Yes review concept ! 4e Approve design concept CDBO/Park Board Yee { 5e Public hearing for Architect/staff Yes approval design development package i I 1136e I M ~f Mal page 2 of 6 Date$ 01/18/91 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL PRIORITY: IMPROVE RELATIONS WITH MINORITIES ^I I I I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I I RESULTS I OR CURRENT ACTIVITJ IE pgJgCSIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED :'0 INEED£D BYi LhccOL ISHED- I I i } I B, Move directly on ReCre- ation Center (Continued) i j Staff/CDBG/ Yee 6, Final review and park Board approval Architect/staff yea E. q, 95% construction documentation yes r g, Bidding complete purchasing Yea ' I uction completion g. Constr en up com- C, Find ways to op appropriate No impact munication with minorities yes Research for i Paulette Holmes surveys completed, The goal 1. Research feasible aur- has been revised to target E veys for organisation- and interview minorities in } wide survey of our organization regarding Ih employees ways to improve relations I within the community- Direct Direct impact on Yes some employee, sp personnel/Employee l personnel cally managers are gelations budget to 26 Target new employees targeted$ We want to with in-house training expend the goal to include tccOmw aseeslonsional ii on procedures and other employees4 professional develop- development of this obiec- went seminars tive is on hold due to reorganization of the Personnel Department, I A r ~ s 1 h,~ t~Y i ii Y Date: 01/18/91 Page 3 of 6 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: IMPROVE RELATIONS WITH MINORITIES I I I I 1 I OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO INEEDED BYI ACCOMI- I RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I 1 ( I I I LISHED I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES) j C. Find ways to open up com- munication with minorities (continued) i 3. Research a 'buddy- Paulette Holmes yea Research and recommenda-' system' for new tions completed. The employees committee is undecided,. regarding the target j group (minorities of J all new employees). 11 Create a speaker Paulette Holmes Yea We worked directly with Printing/dtetribution I bureau's list to be the Image Committee in coat could impact distributed to the schools compiling a speaker's General Fund. bureau list. f 5. Compile s list of John McGrane 12/89 Newly added in fall, 1988. No impact minority Venders that We are working with the car. be used by the Chamber of commerce to City. compile this list. D. Examine law enforcement patterns as they [elate to issues impacting the minority community. I 1. Identify issues and Police Yes Issues affecting cast Direct impact on police I pract: is with special Denton are being discussed Department budget f of unig"a impact in neighborhood meetings through both in-house and alternate plans for and citizen input community relations/ E 1138e 1 I i , I 11 1 1 \1 1 w I, Dates 01/18/91 PROGRESS REPORT page 4 of 6 CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: IMPROVE RELATIONS WITH MINORITIES i I ) I I I I { I OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO INEEDED BY) ACCOMP- ( RESULTS ) ( I LISMED I I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I ( OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES f D. Examine law enforcement patterns as they relate to I ' issues impacting the minority community. (Continued) r neighborhood involvement programs, i.e., (Cops) have been devised. Recommend referring this issue to Public Safety Goals Task Force E. Aggressive recruitment of ~ employees PY 88-89 budgat proposal Direct Impact on Includes more resources Personnel/Employee for recruitment and Relations budget Affirmative Action Train- j ing sessions. 1. Brief Executive Group Personnel Yea Affirmative Action Com- f on AA status and mittee briefed the execo- objectives tives in August, 1988. Executives agreed to incor- porate Affirmative Action Goals into performance reviews of managers. 1. Brief managers/super- Personnel Yes Training and briefings visors on AA statue were held for all managers in spring, 1988, on the f Affirmative Action status of their respective departments. 1 1138e i i i 1 1 r p ~Y Y r t Date: 01118191 Page 5 of 6 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITYi IMPROVE RELATIONS WITH MINORITIES I I I I I I I I OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO (NEEDED BYI ACCOMP- I RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I k ( I I LISEED I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES I E E. Aggressive recruitment of employees (continued) 3. Train all managers/ Personnel Yea Training on selection supervisors in selec- interviewing is conducted Lion interviewing on a quarterly basis for l techniques managers. Affirmative Action and EEOC issues are emphasized. New managers and managers that have not completed the courses are targeted. 4. Explore feasibility of Personnel Ongoing Yes Tracking system was devised } Implementing applicant by Data Processing and tracking system to implemented in falls 1988, j I track number of quali- in the Personnel Departments fied minorities being referred to departments against those selected. k I k ' 5. Increase recruitment Personnel Ongoing Yes Each department has been activity In targeted briefed regarding their { minority areas protected class statue. During recruitment for vacancies, efforts are made to target deficiencies. t f 11380 1 ~ 4 Date, 01/18/91 PROGRESS REPORT Pa9) 6 of 6 CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY, IMPROVE RELATIONS WITH MIMES I I ~ J OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO I I J INEEDED BYI ACCOMP- I RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGET J I LISHED I AND/ J OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES J E, Aggressive recruitment of employees icontinued) 6, Encourage use of Personnel Ongoing Yea developmental tracki Developmental tracking has + tracking of minority applicants been implemented where + f feasible. There is still a need to raise the ocgani- i zation's awareness regarding this option during the recruitment process, 7. Evaluate use of tuition reimbursement by Personnel Ongoing Yes The use of tuition reim- minority employees and bursement increased for determine ways to 1967-88 fiscal year. This increase individual includes a slight increase I Participation of usage by women and minorities. personnel continues to explore efforts to increase use by all employees, 8. Develop a proposal David Ellison I€ outlining the guide- Yes Completed in conjunction No impact 3 lines and procedures with Compa and Umant to establish an employee exchange program I 11180 C r.f , t coal: Neighborhood Identity Team Leader: Jesus Nava, Jr. i Charge: To coordinate the City's involvement in improving the quality u of life in targeted neighborhoods. , I , f `I 1 10180 i IP@,~ Dates January 18, 1991 Page 1 of 3 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITYI NEIGHBORHOOD IDENTITY IMPLEMENTATION TEAMS Barbara Ross, Team Leader Cecile Carson, Code Enf. Michael Jess - Police Jackie Doyle - Insp, Jesus Nava, Team Leader Bill Angelo - Comm. Svcs, Bob Hagemann - Fire Jewel Austin - Library Harry Pereaud - Planning Steve Brinkman - Packs H. Jefferson - Finance Jerry Clark - Eng. I OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO INEEDED BY) ACCOMP- I RESULTS ( IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I I I I LISHED I ( OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES _I I Is Gather materiel outlining I Jesus Nava I I Yes I ICMA's Management Advisoryl No impact, ! I approaches to neighborhoodl Harry Pereaud I I 3 Service and American I I 1 improvements planning, andl I I I Planning Association's I 1 Identify programs used in I I I I Planning Advisory Service I I I other communities, I I I I provided numerous studies I I I I I and sample approaches. I I . I I I I I 1 ) z I 1 I I 1 I I E` 12, Assemble staff team and ( Jesus Nava I I Yes I City Manager's Office, I Minimal Impacts I a 1 inform them of goal of I I I I Plannings Finance, Parks I I program and desired I ) I I & Recreation, Library# I I results. I I t I Police, Fires Engineeringsl I ~ I I I I I Building Inspections, ( ! I I I I I Community Services are I I I I I among operations involved,l j I I I I 3, Continue outreach to I Entire Team 1 00/88 1 Ongoing I East Denton monthly neigh-1 Impact varies accord- I I priority neighborhood(s)- I I I I borhood meetings continue.I ing to departments ) ! Explain goal and establishl I I I West Denton Residents and I I trust and communication I I I f Business Association has I I between staff and 1 I ! I been organized, COPS now I I reaidentes Stress need I I I I in place, I I for cooperation, I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ i I I I I I I I i I I ! I ! I I , I I 2312 1 i ++I 1 1 M1 Date: January 18, 1991 1 PROGRESS REPORT Page 2 of 3 JJX~~ CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: NEIGHBORHOOD IDENTITY I I ( 1 I I OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO INEEDED BYI ACCOMP- I 1 RESULTS I I I I LISHED I I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I I I 1 1 I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES I 1 4. Listen to and document I i I I Entire Team I I Ongoing I Problems and priorities I Impact varies accord- I I problems and priorities asl I I ( are Provided to staff 1 ing to department. I defined by neighborhood I I I I at the monthly meetings. ! { I and respond to them in I I I I Staff responds and I best possible manner. I 1 ( I resolves problems I I I I I I appropriately. I I I 1 I 1 I I I ~ I j ~ I i I I I ! f I I 1 1 i S. Involve neighborhood In Isubcommlttee I 07/90 I I i analysis of different I Ongoing I East Denton Neighborhood I impact varies accord- I lof Staff Team I I I Group participated in I ing to departinent. I I programs used elsewhere. Ii Neighborhood I # I City-wide clean-up, night I I I j I Select alternative(s) to IRepreaentativesl I t out against crlme# and I I recommend to City Council I I 1 I was instrumental In I I that staff and neighbor- I I I I continuing Library I I hood feel might work in I I I I outreach program, ! I Denton, I 1 I I I I 1 f ( ! I ) 6. Select a preliminary I City Council I ( Yes I East Denton model has been( 1 ~ approach using East Dentonj i I ( duplicated in West Denton I I ! I as a model. I I neighborhood. I I k ~ I ! I I _ f I { I I I I I i 7, Evaluate and Inform City I Jesus Nava I 12/90 I Ongoing ( I Council of effectiveneas# I I I I j 1 I problems, and Issues that I I ) I develop In East Denton. I I I I I I 1 I If successful# project I I I I I costs and present plan fort I I I 1 I I I implementing in other I I I I I neighborhoods, i I I 1 i I I I I ~ i I J 2312] i 1 I M I [yr IE r •r i h Dates January 18, 1991 Page 3 of 3 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: NEIGHBORHOOD IDENTITY s I I I I I I OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO IN£EDED BYI ACCOMP- I RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I I I I I LISHED I i OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES I f I I 1 I I 18. Determine whether to I City Council I 12/90 I Yes I West Denton Residence and I Selecting process or I 1 implement program in others I I I Business Association has I structure that maxims- I I neighborhoods and select 1 I I I been organized: COPS pro- I zes chances of success I structure based on East I ! I I gram has been started: I but minimizes Impact onl Denton results and I I I I I code enforcement acts- I budget will be diF[!- I f I potential budgetary I i I i vities have been priori- I cult based on model 1 k I impact. I I I I tized and beautification I systems Identified to I I I 1 I projects have been I date. 1 I 1 I I I identifieds I I f t L i I I I C I. f 2312) i Goal: Interlocal Relations/Intergovernmental Relations Team Leader: Howard Martin Charge: To evaluate and recommend ways in which the City of Denton and other governmental entities can work together to improve the delivery of services in Denton and the region. E E 1 , i I ~ 1 1 i i 10180 r n N 1 Date: 01/18/91} PROGRESS REPORT page i of 19 d CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: INTERLOCAL RBLATIONS INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS IMPLSF19NTATION TSAR: Howard Martin, Team Leader Debra Drayovitch Richard Poster Coolle Carson / Tom Shaw Joella Orr Ray Wells Tom Klinck Nonce Kull Gary Matheson Lloyd Harrell Frank Robbins' OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO INEBDKD BYI ACCOMP- I RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ LISHSD OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES A. What are we presently doing about lnterlocal/inter- governmental relations? C 1. The County " rr a. City manager meets Lloyd Harrell Ongoing In place regularly with As needed heals - last. County Judge meeting 01/14/91 b. Coordinate with Frank Robbins Ongo! County on plate Process in place County Engineer in STJ attends DRC committee as requested to review I ETJ plats c. Joint funding--SMS, Various Staff Ongoing Funding in place, Library, Civil will continue Defense, Health Department d. County Transpor- Rick Svehla On of c lotion Plan g ng Study completed Transportation Plan will ~ be submitted to Council February S, 1991 and then will coordinate with County. I 11389 1 e I i i I i N r 9 1 Ya. owl Dater 01/18/91 Page 2 of 19 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITYI INTERLOCAL RELATIONS/INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS I I I I I I I OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO INEEDED BYI ACCOMP- I RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I I LISHED I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES a. Upper Trinity Bob Nelson Ongoing 01/01/91 Steering Committee Regional Water phased out. County District participating on Board of Directors and providing funding.. Currently studying Solid waste needs of the county, f, share Denton's Mike Jet Ongoing On hold, liability Liability concerns facilities for Gary Matheson issues unresolved require a liability firearms training release plus proof of insurance to continue use of the facility. i g, Work on 911 system Rick Svehla Ongoing System implemented 911 to operational. Jim Alexander John Cook John MCGrane h. 2499 Task Votes Rick Svehla Ongoing 12/01/89 Task Force in place New memberst Corinth and cooper Canyon, Draft 8nv1r0nmente1 impact Statemont for section bstvean IN 407 and IN 2181. will be presented to Highway j Commission on Match 26s We will also ask to fund and begin study of final portion from E IN 2181 to 1-392 at I } 2138e that Commission sting. ~ i 1 j ~ 4 t Date: 01/18/91 Page 3 of 19 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN COAL/PRIORITY; INTERLOCAL RELATIONS/INTERGOVSRNMENTAL RELATIONS ! I I I I ! I OBJBCTIVS/TASK I ASSIGNED TO INEEDSD BYI ACCOMP- I RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I I I ( Linn OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES 1. Sharing access of John McGrane Ongoing In place 3-5 transactions per supplies through month. Popular items: warehouse plumbing supplies, refuse bags, conduit, and sign blanks. J. Joint Surplus John McGrane Ongoing 09/29/89 Sold impound vehicles Auction and Sheriff'e Department automobiles on 09/29/89. No change or update. i 2. Denton Independent School District J! e. Joint el ations Jennifer Ongoing 05/05/90 1990 Election Completed Next election 05/91 1 1 with sot "o1 Walters district i fff j b. Semi-annual staff Lloyd Harrell Ongoing 11/07/89 In place Meetings as needed. meetings with E school district ! + o. Parks & Recreation Steve Brinkman Ongoing On hold. 5 sera neighborhood I 1 Zoning approved (see park on University. i Joint planning for park sitet item e. below) Lease through Neighborhood park at t 1993 Teasley and Lontrldge. } 5 year lease. No funds I for development. I r1 1138e i 1 AF 7w .w page 4 of 19 Date: 01/18/91 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN ~OS1,LPp~gRIT INTM nc>, RELATIONTBRGOvaRlMgNTAL RRLATION9 y RESULTS E IMPAC2 ON BUDGET AND/ OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO iNBEDED BY ACCOKPLISH D- I I OR CURRENT ACTIYITIgB ~ As needed planning/coordination d. Parke 6 Recreation Steve Brinkman Ongoing efforts for in-door pool share facilities facility at Billy Ryan with school district High School Site ca i G hold because of funding. In place Master planning for { Northlake complete. Includes possible j school site. { City staff prepared e. Planning 6 Zoning crank Robbins Ongoing Approved As needed planned Development. { consultations with concept plan for 0180 schools on coning property on University , Drive. Meetings in Plate Last luncheon 09/19/90 f. Joint School Board/ City Council Ongoing Next luncheon 04/91 ` City council 4 luncheon meeting Drug Abuse Resistance } g. Police 6 vice Cary Matheson Ongoing 12/01/89 Programs in place 8ducation, 15 week - I' program for schools John Cook curriculum, Currently j (crime d fire taught at all prevention programs) elementary campuses6 Expanded to include K-6. i 1990 voluntary load f Programs in place { ( h. Knergy Conservation/ Bob Nelson Ongoing reduction craditl dater Utility pro- $10,872. Also E grams with Schools participating in "Summer Sene$" program. Provide DIED i with monthly energy use report for echcols and administration building. i 1139e ri r w Date: 01/18/91 Page 5 of 19 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: INTERLOCAL LATIONS/INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS OBJECTIVE/TASK ( ASSIGNED TO IN99DED BYJ ACCOMP- J RESULTS J IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ J I - LISHED _ I aft-CURRENT ACTIVITIES I I. Sharing access of John McGrane Ongoing In place 10-12 transactions supplies through per month, Items warehouse include plumbing supplies, and refuse bags. Summer Reading Joella Orr Ongoing 01/01/91 Programs in place Continue meeting with Clubs school librarians to promote club acti- vities. k. Literacy Program Joella Orr Ongoing 1989-90 programs funded. 53 students enrolled 1990-91 programs not 02189. Last 12 months { funded 2,068 hours of tutoring provided. 1990-91 programs are Volunteer programs, 1. Joint Surplus John McGrane Ongoing 09/26/90 Auction complete Auction office supplies Auction and equipment, buses, traotor, eta. 3. State r a. City Council annual City Council Ongoing dinner with state legislators b. Denton County Day City Council Ongoing in Austin February 18-19, 1991 1138e t.:. er#mc-~ 1 Date: 01118/91 Page b of 19 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORIT : INTERLOCAL RELATIONS tN R GOVE NgNTAU RELATIONS `r OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO IN809D BYI ACCOMP- I _ RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ L___ _ 1 LISHED 1__~~_ I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES 1 c. Share Denton's Mike Jex Ongoing On hold, liability Liability concerns facilities for Gary Matheson issues unresolved require a liability firearms training release plus proof a insurance to continuo use of the facility. d. Update on pending Lloyd Harrell ongoing In place THL legislation Debra Drayovitch Catherine Tuck e. Board of Directors Joella Orr Ongoing Active members 1Last TKL 0/25/ p meeting of TML f. Radio bunking Rick Svehla Ongoing Negotiation continuing Discussed system System (for DPS Ray Wells operation and patrol care) associated cost 05/89. No action to date. E Federal I a. City Council to City council ongoing 12/01/89 In place Next conference Washington to 03/91. meet with legislators (NLC) j b. Share Denton's Nike Jex Ongoing On hold, liability Liability concerns tl facilities for Gary Matheson issues unresolved release a plus proof liabilityof firearms training inst moe to continue use of the facility. " a i I 1138e r Date: 01/18/91 Page 7 of 19 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN CiQAL/PRIORITYj_INTERLOCAL RELATIONS/INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO (NEEDED BYJ ACCOMP- RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ f ` L-I LISHED OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES I o. Participation in Frank Robbins Ongoing Training and travel al Planning funding cut in Planning National and Development budget. l Plan organizations Barbara Rose is official In Regional Community Development Association. d. Membership - US Bob Castleberry Ongoing 01/01/91 Active member Conference of Mayors e. Participate in Frank Robbins Ongoing in progress 1990 Census Count Task Bureau of Census Force encouraging participation in census activities. f. Joint Surplus Tom Shaw Ongoing 09/26/89 Auction complete U.S. Marshal and DRA use contracte now, no Auction lotjer use area cities. g, Participation in Bob Nelson Ongoing In place 1990 Load Reduction Program Credits 0j81;. } voluntary Load Richard Footer Reduction Program by PIMA 5. Other Cities a, Meet once each Lloyd Harrell Ongoing In place quarter with TMPA Bob Nelson cities i 1138e k i 1 i Dater 01/18/91 Page 8 of 19 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY1 INTERLOCAL RELATIONS/INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS i i ) I i I 1 I OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO (NEEDED BYI ACCOMP- I RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I I I I LISHED I ) OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES I b. City Managers/Mayors Lloyd Harrell Ongoing In place Meetings as needed from TMPA Cities Bob Castleberry c. Train animal control Nonte Kull Ongoing Training available Training as requested officers of other small cities d. Mutual aid afire, Rick &vchla ongoing 12/01/89 In place Mutual aid agreements police, and civil in place for police defense) and fire where legally allowed. e. Meeting of Library Joella Orr ongoing 01/01/91 In place Meets monthly with , Directors in Metro other cities in Plex area North Texas f. Upper Trinity Bob Nelson ongoing 01/01/91 interim wastewater Regional Water contract with Denton District complete. first UTRWD 3 wastewater customer 4 will be the City of Argyle. Presently a negotiating a joint ownership dgreement for wata! cceatment j , sv% icas with Denton. i The District has entered into Water supply contract with i Corinth, Highland 1 Village, Northlake, Pilot Point, Banger, Lake Cities, Argyle, Bartonville and Mustangs 1138e ..........-..n...-.n l.~V av. 'wAn Y.e ..q UmM1Y~a✓. r 1 Date: 01/18/91 PROGRESS REPORT Page 9 of 19 CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: INTRRLOCAL RELATIONS/INTER00VERNMENTA4 RELATIONS f OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO =NEEDED BY LISH ACCOMP- f RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGBT AND/ I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES g. Animate housed Nonie Kull Ongoing Currently not con- from other cities traci=ng with s=ites. within county Available upon request. h. Regular meetings of Mike Jez Ongoing In place Regular monthly meetings Police Chiefs, Cary Matheson of the Denton Personnel Fire e Chiefs, Joelle Orr Association= serve on F, John Cook Board of Directors, Finance Directors, John McGrane North Texas Chapter, Personnel Directors Tom Klinck IPMA (International Economic Development Linda Ratliff Personnel Management Professionals Association). Attend regular meetings of Economic Development { Professionals ! Roundtable at NTCOG I. Sharing acocss of John McGrane Ongoing In place Smaller pities using supplies through programs Krum Sanger, warehouse Pilot Point, Highland I Village, Lewisville. f ! 20-25 transactions per month. !i Share Denton's Mike Jez Ongoing On hold, liability Liability concerns facilities for Gary Matheson issues unresolved require a liability { firearms training release plus proof of { insurance to continue use of the facility, fI k. TML - regional City Council ongoing 12/01/89 Quarterly sleeting TML annual conference meetings and Staff , f 11380 f r i!Flwo~ 1 A~ ± Datei 01/18/91 PROGRESS REPORT Page 10 of 19 CITY COUNCIL STFATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITYs INTERLOCAL RELATIONS/INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS I I I I I I I I OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO INEEDED BYI ACCOMP- I RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I - I I I LISHED I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITI9S I It County and regional Lloyd Harrell Ongoing 12/01/69 In place Session held is Parmers quarterly meeting - Branch# Grand Prairie, City Managers and Euless- Denton County City manager's 11/30/90. no Meeting of Metro- Lloyd Harrell Ongoing 12/01/89 In place Monthly meetings plat Mayors Bob Castleberry he Work on 911 system Rick Svehla ongoing 12/01/69 System implemented 911 is operational. Jim Alexander John Cook John McGrane o- Participation in Various staff Ongoing 12/01/89 In place COG activities Council Members 1) Water Resources Council-Bob Nelson i 2) Finance Directors Round table-John j : . McGrans 3) Public Personnel- Attend personnel Tom Klinck roundtable meetings when scheduled, sponsored and facilitated meeting on military reservists (joint sheeting IPMA and COO) October 1990, 1138• 1 ' Y ya . t . Dater 01/18/91 PROGRESS REPORT Page lk of 19 CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GUl1L/PRIORITYY INTERLOCAL RELATIONS/ I NTERGOVBRNMENTAL RELATIONS OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO INEEDBD BYE ACCOMP- I RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ 1 _ I LISHRD E OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES 4) Reservoir Watershed Management Steering Committee-Howard Martin r 5) Air Quality Advisory r Council-Howard Martin 6) City Managers Advisory Committee-Lloyd Harrell 7) Purchasing Seminars- Tom Shaw Serve on Cooperative 8) Urban Stormwater Task Purchasing Committee Force-Howard Martin, Jerry Clark 9) Regional Planners Roundtable-Prank Robbins, Harry Persaud 10) Regional Data Center- Harry Pereaud 11) EconY DevY Professionals Roundtable-Linda Ratliff Attend regular meetings of NTC00 !loon, Dev. I Prof. Roundtable. J i p. Participate in Bob Nelson Ongoing Dallas Water 1490 meeting complete Last meeting Management Ad- January 31, 1990 vlsory Committee q. Participate in the Howard Martin ongoing Annual study complete Last meeting 02/90 C Customer Cities Cost of Service Study r. Participate in Bob Nelson Ongoing In lace Reservoir Joint p Monthly meetings Operating Committee I 11380 ~~1~'NJA.~,1M.Li~~.(i►.WifYM it w>rve..., I y Date: 01/18/91 Page 12 of 19 , PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: INTERLOCAL RELATIONS/INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS I OBJ8CTI%'E/'.e'SK I ASSIGNED TO ~NEEDZD SYJ ACCOMP- I RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ 1 I I LISHED I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES e. 2499 Task Force Rick Svehla Ongoing 12/01/89 Task Force in place Member cities: Denton, Denton County, Highland Village. Traffic projections complete. Route still undetermined. Narrowed routing from 11 to approximately 6. 4r, Currently focusing on envirormental issues. t. "ETJ" Agreements Frank Robbins Summer In progress Meetings with Copper establishing 1991 Canyon. jurisdictional boundaries 1) Strategic Policy being formulated in Annexation plan. 2) Researching what the boundaries are and coordtnat- ing with other jurisdictions. I u. Joint Surplus Tom Shaw Ongoing 09/26/90 In place Last auction with Auction Lewisville, Forrest E Hills$ Addison, Tarrant County. i 6. UNT 3 TWU a. Meet with UNT/TWU Bob Nelson Ongoing In place UNT 1990 Voluntary Load i on utilities, rate, Reduction Creditt cogeneration$ 1281674. TM $12,636 energy management Rate reduction to load management UNT/TWU 10/01/89. Recycling. 11388 i r 1 Date: 01/18/91 PROGRESS REPORT Page 13 of 19 CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORI : INTERLOCAL RgLATI0N9/INTERCOYBRNMENTAL RELATIONS OBJECTIVE/TASK 1 ASSIGNED TO 1N88DRD BYE ACCOMP- RESULTS f LISHBD 1 IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ OR CURRENT ACTIVITIg9 b. Joint City/ Betty McKean Ongoing In Place University Regular meetings. teem economic Participated in Denton development County Day for gconomic Development (09/26/89) and Denton Clean-Up Day (10/17/90). ? Coordinated Town/Gown meetings, E e. Regular coordination Miku Jez Ongoing of law enforcement Program moving forward Preliminary plans with activities with Chief Jackson from UNT UNT/TWU for university irvolve- I ment COPS program expansion. f Current plans for a ' community office at UNT site has been selected,. d. Library~Unlversity Joella Orr Ongoing 01/01/91 In place programs Cooperate with Center for Texas Studies on book review, e. Intern program CMO/others ongoing 12/01/89 In place gmploying Industrial Tech, students, City Manager's intern starting 01/15/91. Customer Service, Personnel, Quest, Planning and Utilities are participating in program, 11386 ) t p i .4 1 a Page 14 of 19 Date. 01/18/91 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY INTERLOCAL RELATIONS/INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS I I I I I ) I OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO (NEEDED $YI ACCOMP- I RESULTS I IMPACT ON I ' I I I LISMED I In place As requested. Alsoo f. Teaching classes Various Staff Ongoing provide information/ at schools, guest resources for various lecturers student activities Si.e., Earth Day). Liability Issues Liability concerns g, Share Denton's Mike Jez Ongoing being evaluated require a liability facilities for Gary Matheson release plus proof of G firearms training insurance to continue use of the facility. What can we do to help improve interlocal/ intergovernmental relations? 1. The County loving forward in the first effort, a. Continue to ex- Mike Jez Ongoing there wero problems f ploce the establish- Gary Matheson with jurisdictional i ment of a Denton and supervisory county Metro Squad responsibilitieso for cooperation in Effort failed. Second I law enforcement? effort is backed by federal grant through ! the County and is moving forward, Meetings in place Quarterly meetings last b, Association of Bob Castleberry Ongoing meeting 01/24/91. Denton County cities 11380 1 r " Page 15 of 19 Date: 01/18/91 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: iNTERLOCAt RELAT[ON9/INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS IMPACT ON D/ OBJECTIVE/TASK i ASSIGNED TO `WORDED BYi LACCO ISHMEPD RESULTS J I OR CURRENTBACTIVITIES E ~ - i c. Develop a formal Debra Ongoing In progress plan for service Drayovitch contracts d. Orientation with Lloyd Harrell Ongoing staffs CMO e. Joint purchasing John McGrano ongoing in place sharing specification of supplies and library. County no longer participating in equipment tires and battery bids. C. Meet informally on Ongoing Attend monthly meetings of Denton Personnel quarterly basis Association; periodic 1) personnel Tom Klinck contact with County 2) public works Rick Svehla Personnel Director. 3) law enforcement Gary Matheson 4) purchasing Tom Shaw g. Receive report John McGrane Ongoing Annual review Coat prohibitive will appraisal continue to review from i i1 asa possibilities on an district ongoing basi committee on single s. E unit tax billing and collection h. Council and County Bob Castleberry Ongoing E Commissioners i Annual Dinner i i. Joint Economic Betty McKean Ongoing 12/01/90 In Place Member of Tex Abatement Development Committee. Tax Abste } meant policy completed Activities and adopted. I 1138e i 1 I WPM! r r ac za~ F r Date: 01/18/91 PROGRESS REPORT Page 16 of 19 lcQAL/PAIGRITY INTER YCAL CLAr TRATEGIC PLAN NS/INTERGOVERNM WAL RELATIONS OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO WEEDED BY ACCOMP- J RESULTS I LISHED I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ 2. Denton Independent ----____L OR CURRENT ACTIV_ ITIE` g f School District a. Joint purchas- John McGrane Ongoing Ing Of supplies On hold and d equipment School district not interested at this b• Receive report time G from appraisal John McGrane j Complete district t sub- - Sab.ditted proposal. committee on single Proposal rejected. ~ `unit tax billing and collection c. Joint services Lloyd Harrell Ongoing 12101/89 directory and CMO investigate blue pages with GTE d. Literacy Program Joella Orr On oin f Outreach 8 8 01/01/91 Not funded for 1990-91 Expanding program to include Multi-genera- tional tutoring. e. "Waste in Place" Cecile Carson ongoing Volunteer program. Program 12/01/89 Being Implemented Setting up educational committee under Beauti- fication Task Force. Implementation for f. Combine "Health school year 89-90. r Care" services Tom Klinek Ongoing Complete city was unable to coordinate with DIED 1138e for Health Care service, 1 J i r I 7~ Y y Date: 01/18/91 Page 1T of 19 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY:__INTERLOCAL RELATIONS/INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO ]NEEDED BYJ ACCOMP- I RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET 4YD/ ] I I II I I LISHED 1 I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES ] g. "Dare" Program Mike Jea Ongoing 12/01/89 Planning stage Expand program from nine j Gary Matheson elementary campuses to eleven campuses. 0 3. State i a. Continue to explore Mike Jea Ongoing No direct involvement the establish- Gary Matheson with the 'Cask Force,' meet of a Denton indirect Involvement County Metro Squad with program. for cooperation in law enforcement b. Joint services CMO Ongoing directory and investigate blue pages with GTE o. Participation in Cecile Carson Ongoing 12/01/89 Joint Program Involves interaction 1 "Keep Texas between City and Texas rl Beautiful" Program State Highway Depart- ; j ment in federal program. 1 NEW 4. Established working Betty McKean Ongoing 12/01/90 In place Worked closely, with relationship with Linda Ratliff staff of TDOC In TDOC staff. application process for Enterprise Zones. Received two zone designations. Chuck Carpenter 10/10/90 Planned, coordinated, Betty McKean and hosted TDOC Economic Development i Board Meeting. I Coordinated workshops, 1 meetings, and TDOC { travel arr 1138e engemeate. 1 e r r- r n y` r t I Date: 01/18/91 Page 18 of 19 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: INTERLOCAL RBLATIONS/INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO INSEDED BYJ ACCOMP- I RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I I 1 LISHED I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES Federal j I a. Joint services CMO OLgoing directory and investigate blue pages with GTE I' 5. Other Cities 1 I a. Continue to ex- Mike Jez Ongoing On hold Problems with juris- plore the establish- Gary Matheson dictional and super- meat of a Denton visory responsiL::ities. County Metro Squad for cooperation in law enforcement b. Maintain quarterly Bob Castleberry Ongoing In progress Quarterly meeting meeting of the established. Next Association of meeting 01/24/91. ~ Denton County Cities. c. Joint purchasing John McGrane Ongoing In progress Common space developed I of supplies and for Denton, Lewisville i equipment w d Carrollton. i ~ I d. Joint auction of John McGrane Ongoing Recruiting participants Piro arm sale with surplus property Mesquite very successful net over $8,200.00. Currently, participating with Richardson on sale of impound automobiles. 113ge f I ~ i 1 1 v , Date: 01/18/91 Page 19 of 19 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: INTERLOCAL RELATIONS/INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO ]NEEDED BY] ACCOMP- ] RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ i I I LISHED i I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES e. Developing strategic Frank Robbins Summer In progress None policies for estab- 1991 lishing ETJ agree- ments in Annexation Plan. G` i 6. UNT A TYU a. City Manager-regular Lloyd Harrell Ongoing 12/01/89 In place Resume To,.-in 6 Gown meetings with repre- meetings quarterly. sentatives of universities for cooperation b. Explore idea of Joella Orr Ongoing Still working on Proposal will be re- connecting three this proposal. submitted with public libraries with library taking the lead automation role. I c. Regular coordination Mike Jea Ongoing Under study Preliminary plans with I I of law enforcement Chief Jackson from UNT 3 activities with for university involve- C UNT/TWU ment COPS program expansion. d. Joint services CMO Ongoing directory and investigate blue pages with GTI ~ i I 11388 J Ji 1 1 ^+I G H r$~ Goal: Housing Goals Committee Team Leader: Barbara Ross Charge: To assess housing needs in Denton and formulate a plan to address those needs. a I i i f 10180 i 1 M i ~ t Datet January 16, 1991 WORK PLAN/ IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES Page 1 of / GOAL/POLICY: ASSESS HOUSING NEEDS IN DENTON AND FORMULATE PLAN TO ADDRESS THOSE NEEDS IMPLEMENTATION TEAMt Robbie Baughman, Building Inspections Marian Hamilton, Denton Housing Authority Cecile Carson, Public Works Harlan Jefferson, Finance Deborah Darley, First State Bank Jesus Nava, City Manager's Office Richard Foster, Energy Management Barbara Ross, Chair, Community Development Cheryl Fox, Heritage Oaks Owen Yost, Planning Department OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY A000MP- RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ 4 LISHED OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES Recommendation has been made B. Ross 02/01/91 12/90 will allow Denton to set May require hiring of by the National Development up housing non-profit and additional staff for Council to HOD that Denton be other housing programs development at community accepted into the 'public- little or no cost. (paid with federal private partnerships to create funds). affordable housing program.' NEW Research zoning ordinance for J. Brady 02/90 Ms. Brady specifically None Impediments to development of mentioned two areas of affordable housing. concern: Minimum lot sizes and multifamily parking requirements. However, she stated that the zoning ordinance generally does not have regulations that would disallow affordable housing. j Research building codes for R. Baughman 05/91 impediments to development of B. Rose May require changes to exi odstinq building affordable housing, c I Codes. Research subdivision regula- C, Carson 05/91 tions for impediments to R, Baughman May require changes to development of affordable B. Ross existing subdivision housing. NEW regulations, I - 2312) i i I~ 1 1 _a Mal Dater January 16, 1991 f WORK PLAN/IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES Page 2 of 4 GOAL/POLICYt ASSESS HOUSING NEEDS IN DENTON AND FORMULATE PLAN TO ADDRESS THOSE NEEDS I I OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO (NEEDED BY) ACCOyp- I I I 7 I I I ( LiSHED I RESULTS 1 IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I ' I I I I I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES -1 I Determine current development 1 0. Yost I 1 costs, Suggest methods I 05/91 I I Possible loss of income) / I A. Baughman depa alternatives in order to I C. Carson ) 1 I I to various mente.I i I I lower costs, I Possible changes to I I subdivision ) I I I I I regulations. I I I , 1 I f I I I Expand 'Adopt A' program to I Co Carson I 1 Continu-1 Program is active in east I New component to I ! include neighborhood help/ I I I ing I and west Denton, Adopt-A-1 existing neighborhood I ± J I cleanup organizations. = f I effort I Spot will be promoted in I organizations. G. I I 1 I I conjunction with April'91 I I I I I f f clean-up program. ) - I I 1 I f I I Make application to Urban i Be Ross f 1 08/90 1 Application approval I Homesteading Program in order I I I I CDBC Funds have been I I to utilize properties avail- I I pending. HUD has stated I allocated to augment 1 1 I I response may come in I Section 108. I I able under Resolution Trust I ( I I January'gl, I I Corporation programs, f I I ) I 1 I 1 I f 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I f I Develop inventor y of availablel H. Jefferson I 04/91 I I Tax attorneys are I There would be some I I Iup for tax foreclosure) I Be Ross I I I currently checking status 1 maintenance cost to thel I properties with potential for ) C. Carson I I I of properties. I City until lots were f I low-mod housing development. I I I I r I I I I I 1 developed. I i I I 1 I I I (j I Research Utilization of Denton) e, Ross I I 1 I I Ongoing I DCHFC Is open to proposelsl City rsonnel I County Housing Finance I I 1 t would I regarding low/mod develop-1 need d to o admi admini nister Corporation to finance low/ I I 1 I ment. They have agreed tot programs, DCHFC has 1 mod. developments. I I I I participate In the Urban I no available staff. I I 1 I Homesteading Program. I I I _1 - f I I 2912) J 1 . Dater January 16, 1991 WORK PLAN/IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES Page 3 of / GOAL/POLICY: ASSESS HOUSING NEEDS IN DENTON AND FORMULATE PUN TO ADDRESS THOSE NEEDS I I I I I OBJECCIVE/TASK { ASSIGNED TO INEEDED 8Y1 ACCOMP- I I I RESULTS I I LISHED I I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ { I + { I I I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES I I Research and report on I M. Hamilton 1 1 12/90 1 DHA re 1 + I opportunities to acquire I C. Fox Ports some developer Not certain at this + I funding for additional public I I + I interest but no projects I time. I + I as of this date. I ~ I housing for families and the I { I I Seventy-six additional I I I elderly. I { I + + ~ NEW I I section eight rental I I + f subsidies were received I JJ ' I I { I I by DHA during the 1990 I i E i I program year. I I I I I I I I Develop a I 1 1 I c.., paint recycling/ I C. Carson f 08/91 I I I house paintin I g program. I 1 1 I Additional program for I I Paint companies provide I I I Code Enforcement/ 1 I materials to paint homes in I I I { I Beautification 1 exchange for recycled paint. 1 { I { I Division. 1 1 { I Volunteer organizations I I { I I + provide labor to paint homes I I + f for those need) I I I I I ng assistance. I I I NEW I + I 1 I I 1 1 I Discuss the following with I B. Ross I 1 I I I 08/91 I 1 local lending institutions: 1 D, Darley I 1 The National 1 I 1 { { Development Council I I R, Foster i I I i will assist in setting ; 11. Utilization of current I I Federal mortgage programs I I up programs with local 1 I I - FHA, GNMA, FNMA, etc. I { banks, 1 { I 1 1 1 2. Including energy f I I efficiency as pact of I I I I I underwriting and includingl + I + I I I cost of installation of I I } I I 3 i energy saving equipment inl ( I I + I ! mortgage loans. 1 1 + I l I I I + I I 1 3. Set aside for low-mod I 1 I I + home buyers. 1 I I { { I ~ I { I 2312] ~-^°M 1 a 1 1 Yl I . J MIMI r IM / r Dates Januacy 16, 1991 WORK PLAN/IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES Page 4 Of 4 GOAL/POLICY/ ASSESS HOUSING NEEDS IN DENTON AND FORMULATE PLAN TO ADDRESS THOSE NEEDS i ( I I I I 1 I 1 r ~i I OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO (NEEDED BYI ACCOMP- I RESULTS I I I LISHED I I IMPACT ON I'~UDGET AND/ I NEW I I ( I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES Research participation in new I B. Ross 1 02/92 I I I { I HOME Program approved by I I 1 NOME participation will 1 Congress for 1992 Fiscal I I I I require some matching I I year.l I I I I Funds from that City,. I r I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I ~ i I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I f 1 I I I I __I ~ I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 t I I I I I I ~ I I I ~ I I ~ 1 1 I I I I ~ i 1 I 1 I 1 1 ~ I I 1 I I I I 1 I i , I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 i I 1 J I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I i I f - I 23121 f 1 1 1 I i t b i Goal: Municipal Court of Record Team Leader: Debra Drayovitch Charge: To analyze the need for, and implications of, making Denton-S Municipal Court a court of record. { f { 1 3 ii i i 10180 04 1 ` i - ft-1 t ` Page 1 of 2 Dates January 9, 1991 PROGRESS REPORT ~i CITY COUNCIL STRATMIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY:MUNICIPAL COURT OF RECORD IMPLEMENTATION TEAM: Debra Drayovitch Sandra White Tanya Cooper John McGrane Gary Collins Tom Josey Lloyd Harrell I OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO INEEDED BYI ACCOMP-I RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ LISHED I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES j ` A. Prepare reports evaluating S. White Program 12/13/88 Continue to monitor None effectiveness of new T. Josey Report appeal system. I d~: B. Keep statistics on the S. White 03189 Continue to monitor None number of appeals T. Josey 10/89 12/14/89 + processed through County 06/90 07/31/90 Court and fines remanded to the City. C. Update council on progress D. Drayovitch 03/28/89 03/28/89 Will update again None iI in meeting goal, Present council with S. White 06/01/89 07/31/90 City Council discussed analysis of generic T. Josey feasibility of seeking Municipal Court of Record special legislation bill and recommendations. D. Submit to Council a coat T. Josey 04/03/90 07/31/90 None benefit analysis on imple- S. White mentation of Court of G. Collins ? Record, under generic bill, including an operational and computer impact analysis. Survey of experience with T. Josey courts in other cities. 39388 e t, . ti ~ I Page 2of2 Dates January 9, 1991 PROGFESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATW IC PLAN i GOAL/PRIORITYa MUNICIPAL COURT OF RECORD OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO INEEDED BYI ACCOMP-I RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ LISHED OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES E. Appointment of City City Council 04/03/90 07/31/90 Mayor Pro-tem Boyd None Council Committee to and Councilmember work with staff in Hopkins appointed to dra!tiag bill. work with Committee. P, Compile other cities' S. White 06/90 11190 2 bills drafted None legislation and draft T. Cooper (1 special d 1 amending bill D. Drayovitch generic bill) Council 1 Committee Municipal Court Advisory Committee 0. Brief legislators on Councilmembers 01/91 None proposed legislation and Boyd and obtain their support Alexander L. Harrell S. White H. Present statistics and L. Harrell Within None analysis to council and S. White 60 days press on present appeal Council of approval system to support concept= Committee by Council meet with county judges of program regarding proposed bill 1. Approval of legislation City Council, 01/91 None by Couacilf meet with Horn, and legislatore{ submit Glasgow " draft of legislation NEW J. Develop plan to acquire S. White 9-1-91 Significant Start-up space for court and files J. McGrane costa for implementing court. 3938g a r i f Goal: Space Plan Team Leader: Steve BrilikMan Charge: To assess the facility needs of the City of Denton and formulate an action plan that will allow the City to use its facilities in the most effective manner possible. 1, E I i 1 i 10180 i r a Date: January 1B, 1991 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN ' COALIPRIORITY: SPACE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION TEAM: Steve Brinkman Bruce Henington Tae Shaw Roger Wilkinson Betty McKean Harlan Jefferson Michael Jez Ernie Tullos Jerry Clark Bob Nelson Debra Droyovitch Frank Robbins Sandra White Gary Collins Rick Svehla OBJECTIVE/TASK A5516NEO TO KEEOED BY ACCOmP- RESULTS IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ r LISHEO OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES 1. Get estimates for Space/ Tom Shaw 8/l/90 Yes Estixoates were Facilities Master Plan Bruce Henin ton 9 secured from Ernie Tullos numerous archi. Steve erinkm+n tectural/Planning firms 2. Develop an RFP to hire a Tom Shaw 1/1/91 Yes RFP's were sent from to undertake a Bruce Henington out In January, Space/Fac111tles Master Steve Brinkman 1991 Plan Ernie Tullos Franc Robbins Bob Nelson i t 3. Hire firm to complete the Ernie Tullos 3/15/91 No plan (eat, 12 months Frank Robbins completion) Toe Show Bruce Heniogton I Executive Co". i 4. As soon as the Space/ Tom Show 10/1/91 No Facilities Molter Plan Brun Henington determines the location Roger Wilkinson for the lend Michael Jez should be acquired as Frank Robbins $oon as Possible 1 I y Dote: January 18, 1991 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: SPACE PLAN 1 OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY ACCOMP- RESULTS OIMPACT ON R CURRENT BUDGET AND/ LISHED ACTIVITIES 5. Develop RFP for LECC Tow Shaw 1 year before No will00,be000 In available CIP funds able at architect and hire Bruce Henington sale of bonds this tin for archl- ` architect. Project Michael Jas for LECC ral services f■ will also include Sandra White textu teat the renovation of Debra Drayovitch the minus the the oust cost for fo Comprehensive of the old City Hall Harlan Jefferson Space Study Jerry Clark I 6. Begin construction of Bruce Henington mined deter- No fu,nds200,will000 in CIP be avail- able (est. 12 eanths) able by this tiro for the construction of LECC and renovation of the existing Police Station (Old City Hall) 7. Begin renovations at Tom Sher To be deter. No will00,be000 in available funds ble at the existing Police Bruce Herrington mined this time for ble a I Station fold City Michael JOE ration o the Old who will Department Dits. City Ha11 and for who x111 be additional improve- moving into the aNnts to the new tw4ldlnp Police facility i i } ~r ~.....r .,r l._ ...µ.•.:,d1.,61Y/F'w'IiirV:lr~rMY'11~.M.Mw++dM.fiwv:W-+''"~••"r'••~•" I it t 4 r i r , Dote: January 18, 1991 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY. SPACE PLAN f OBJECTIVE/TASK ASSIGNED TO NEEDED BY ACC OW- RESULTS OIMPACT ON R CURRENT BUDGET AND/ LISHED ACTIVITIES 8. Complete construction of Bruce Henington To be deter- No LECC and save staff to Michael Jez mined ` foci 11ty 9. Start construction at old Bruce Henington To be deter- No City Hell (3 months) mint G I 10, Mire a space planner to Tom Shaw To be deter- No This will need to W develop and coordinate Bruce Henington mined budgeted In a future a move plan when the Depts. involved FY if the scope of I'I existing Police Station this move affects 1 H near completion more than just two or three departments i I CEP Funds Becoae Available: ! February ; 2006000 ` To be determined $2,400,000 f I i f E ADPM91 1 N Coal: Economic Development Team Leader: Betty McKean Charge: To assiet in the coordination of the city's and Chamber of Commerce's efforts to attract new industries to Denton and retain those industries already in place. I E G• i i 1 ,I } l k f i i 10180 i I ~J~ s re+amy . i r ~ Date: 01/18/91 PROGRESS REPORT Page 1 of 5 CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION TEAMt Betty McKean, Team Leader Jack Miller (Ex Officio) Bob Nelson Frank Robbins Ken Burdick {Ex Officio) Rick Svehla John McGrane Linda Ratliff ) I I ; I OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO ) I I (NEEDED BYI ACCOMP- I RESULTS I G I I LISBED I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I 1. Examine policies/ordinances L. Ratliff on-going I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES I that could hamper economic K, Burdick Recommendations to City Revisions to policies/ development and suggest Manager, City Council ordinances revisions 2. Serve as Advisory Board B. McKean member for the small on-going Meetings attended J% L Business Devele.nent L. Burdick Center K• Burdick 3. Analyze what other cities K. Burdick are doing to attract and L, Burdick On-going Recommendations to City Incentives to industry Ratliff retain industry through Manager and city council Incentives Analyze and prepare B• Bolt r information for tree rt Dec. 90 Yes ordinance adopted in Po D, Pitstick Inventory tax exemption, exemption J, McGrane April, 1990. Kent Into Estimated loss of effect January 1, 1991. Personal property tax revenue amounting ) 5120,000. 1 5. Boat Breakfast with the B. McKean ! Mayor to promote economic L, Ratliff On-going Attendance/participation MS/ED budget J, development Quarterly of community leaders i { I 1 i 101/k i r, s M1:1. v'e S Date: 01/18/91 Page 2 of 5 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION TEAM. Betty McKeano Team Leader Bob Nelson Frank Robbins Jack Miller (Ex Officio) Rick Svehla John McGrane Ken Burdick (Ex Officio) Linda Ratliff j I I I I 1 I I j OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO (NEEDED BYI ACCOMP- I RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I I I I LISHED I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES I 6. Develop/Coordinate K. Burdick On-going Proposals to Industrial Materials for Proposals to major indus- Be McKean Prospects Proposals, trial prospects including: Re Svehla -negotiations with to Ratliff property owners -development of funding alternatives for road- way improvements with State Highway Dept -contacts with local and state officials to de- velop incentives 7. Provide support to chamber to Ratliff On-going Recommended industrial in updating industrial sitee/buildings E! sites/buildings information Be Contact local industry and Ae Burdick On-going Number of contacts I try to attract suppliers L. Ratliff l to our area 9. Support the Chamber, County Be McKean On-going Contacte/meetings attended and Universities for Region- L. Ratliff Data collection al economic development Research/reports efforts I LJ i 1 181ik I I 11 --1 1 44,. Date: 01/18/91 Page 3 of 5 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITY: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION TEAM: Betty McKean, Team Leader Bob Nelson r Jack Miller (Ex Officio Frank Robbins Rick Svehla John McGrane Ken Burdick (Ex Officio) Linda Ratliff I I 1 OBJECTIVE/TASK I ASSIGNED TO INEEDED BYI ACCOMP- I RESULTS I I I I I LISHED I I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES 10. Maintain a continuing K, Burdick On-going Revisions to plan reportingo monitoring# and updating process of Denton's economic development plan 11. Monitor economic development Be McKean On-going Development of new f literature for new Ideas and L, Ratliff programs programs which fit into our overall plan 12. Serve as liaison with NTC, Be McKean On-going Number of contacts/ fJ NTCOG and other agencies and L. Ratliff Memberships/dues participate In economic Ke Burdick meetings development networks 13e Contribute to development Be McKean On-going Development of NEW of marketing plan for K. Burdick Participate in Irce I-35W corridor marketing plan corridor task force meetings 14, Develop bi-monthly Fact Le Ratliff 81-monthly Bi-monthly economic Sheet and distribute to fact sheet departments 154 Review internal procedures F. Robbins On-going Recommendations to Revisions to for Development Review streamline development development review process process 16, Take steps to continue Re Svehla On-going Recommendations to implementing Airport Le Ratliff Costs of Improvements Master Plan improve image/facilities 1014k I 4 r I; 4 Dates 01/18/91 PROGRESS REPORT Page 4 of 5 CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRYS ECONOMIC EVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION TEAM, Betty McKean. Team Leader Jack Miller (Ex Officio) Bob Nelson Frank Robbins Ken Burdick (Ex Officlo) LiRindcka Ratliff SlaJohn McGrane j I OBJECTIVE/TASK ( ASSIGNED TO 1 I 1 Ir_ ) (NEEDED BYI ACCOMp- I RESULTS ~ I I LISHED I I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND/ 1 17. Develop Airport Marketing L. Ratliff Apr, 191 1 OR CURRENT ACTIVITIES ) Material K. Burdick Airport marketing Subject to funding brochure/plan 18a Update utility service area L. Ratliff C7, transportationo planning On-going j maps Map inventory Cost of maps 19. Identify available financ- ing and financial resources g, McKeane On-going Financial incentives for incentives including, L. R Ktliff for economic develo Revenue through - Tax Increment financing No Burdick ment prospects coat Participation ! - Public/Private Partnerships agreements and - Industrial Loan Pund grant funds - Export Financing 7 - Enterprise Zones - Industrial Bonds - Economic Development Grants 10. Complete update of fact L, Ratliff Mar. 191 NEVI book and enter on Fact book cost of reproduction in-house computer (Xerox) I 21. Preparation of data base L. Ratliff June 191 f of community information Inventory of local and local industries industries 27. Provide Support/information B. McKean On-going to citizens and consultants K. Burdick Contacts with public Mailing and phone costa L. Ratliff 1814k 1 r 04 t ~ I 1 I ..I r t 1 wRI r 1 Dates 01/18/91 Page 5 of 5 PROGRESS REPORT CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL/PRIORITYt ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IMPLRMENTATION TEAMt Betty McKean, Team Leader Bob Nelson Frank Robbins Jack Miller (Ex Officlo) Rick Svehla John McGrane Ken Burdick (Ex officio) Linda Ratliff j I t I ! I I I I ~I ~ OBJECTIVE/TASK ( ASSIGNED TO INEEDED BYI ACCOMP- I RESULTS I IMPACT ON BUDGET AND,! ) 1 1 I I LISHED I I OR CURRENT ACTIVITI I -1 t l i t# 23, Assist employee relocation Be McKean On-going Relocation programs/ Activities X, Burdick orientation sessions Materials k L, Ratliff 24, Prepare Develop Application D, Pitstick April 190 N/A Grant Application City did not for Federal Economic meet Federal Development Grant requirements 25. Develop site maps and L. Ratliff Maps and reports on industrial site profiles 5-industrial area and related sites 26e Implement Business Retention Be McKean On-going Assistance programs for assistance to local L, Ratliff for industries business and industry 2?. Develop marketing material K, Burdick Apr, 091 Enterprise Zone Budgeted at NEW for Enterprise Zone L, Ratliff marketing brochure the Chamber P 3 } I 181/k i i 1 li REVIEW OF CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES l CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION, FEBRUARY 5, 1991 1 BUMARY OT CHANGER OCCURRING SINCF JANUARY 1990 Qysl/nrior;~yt public Safety Deletions% None Additionst None Goal/prioritvt Transportation Deletionst o Seek representation on DFW Transportation Study. No staff appointed to committee, efforts with Additions ° Coordinate dWorks. county Director of Public goal/n iorityt Analyze _Dove IQpment process Deletions: None Additions ° planning publications maizatiolingnlist presidents to o aAssistance dvertisingfcampa gn for development services:. i ° at~dev developments, plattin for ETJ subdivisions single tract where infrastructure is in place, and minor building on unplatted property. o "Double notice" zoning cases. Prepare zoning ordinance for Planning and zoning meeting. Goal/prier ty Matotm pavelobment Deletions: o Study potential methods of financing a {downtown] land use study. Completed. Additionst o Restructure Main treet Advisory Board k Force as Downtown i r 1 y ~ 6 r Y~ o Using research, develop long-term institutionalized funding plan for public improvement district. o Market and coordinate Denton Cornerstones Pro ram including accou Aver :Finance, bidding pr3ect and promoting p o Develop retail package professional commercial image promote a for downtown). o submit six nominations for Texas Downtown Association Annual Awards Program. Si9~/priority: Eaergy iuues Deletions: 0 Consider installing an energy mgmt computer control system to be used by 15-20 major customers. Currently infeasible. 0 Consider leasing energy mgmt system and person to these 15-20 major customers. currently infeasible. 0 Form an energy mgmt group for information sharing between energy mgmt professionals in the City. Little interest generated. o Investigate the possibility of a solar hot water division within the Utilities Department. Lack of federal incentives for solar energy$ Additions: None j s Ocallpriorityl city eeautilicaticg Deletions: None Additions: 0 Adopt-A-Spot Program (encourage groups and city dive/depte to clean areas 4 times annually). i o Fxplore expanded use of probationers and other ; use groups to do special clean-ups. o (Promote) Tree City, USA and Releaf Denton. i 11 JI 1 i . 't. ~ M 1 F i o Consider development of Denton Blooms Festival. o increase street sweeping. Goa /Priorityt Financing Op,eratioal Deletions None Additions None I goal/Prioritys improve City image Ci Deletionst o Speakers Bureau. Request for city presentations handled by City manager and mayor. o Coffee with Mayor, Council members, and City Manager. Program phased out, replaced by "Good Job memosl' and ''Dedicated to Quality service pins". Additions: 0 Chamber of Commerce Breakfast Forum. (Questions posed by chamber membership are answered by City staff members.] o City of Denton Town Hall Meetings. Goal/Priorityt User Fees Deletionst None Additions: None f i Goal/Priority: improve aelations vith minorities Deletionst None Additionst None Goal/Priorityt Neighborhood identity Deletions: None Additions: None s 1 i M r40Ver~+~,~t!_1 Relations Beal/~ tNv~ local Deletionss o County - An housed from county areas. to hOuss animals Areement has unincorporatedbareasain city facility. from o County - Radio Trunking System. Negotiations tailed, County installed ovn system. p DIED Student Disciplinary Committee. project completed and in pleas. 0 other Cities - County Transportation Plan. ; Study bas been completed. o TWU & UNT - Working with UHT administration on t project Management" software did not complete mtasks. failed o State - Establish working relationship with Additionst Texas Department Of Commerce staff. 1 Si4~ -ss~ss and a6dress gousinc Needs o Continue efforts to acquire assistance from Deletions the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation to develop non-profit housing corporation. i National Development council program is being substituted as cheaper, more probable alternative. Additionst o National Development Council recommendation to HUD that Denton be accepted into the "public- private partnerships to create affordable housing programs. o Research subdivision regulations for ' impediments to development of affordable housing. o Research and report on opportunities to uire funding for elderly. public housing families and the for o Develop a paint recycling/house painting program. Paint companies provide materials to paint homes in exchange for recycled paint to paint tose organizations needing assistance. homes for t iv , S !a q~ .r o Research participation in new HOME program approved by Congress for 1992 fiscal year. Goal/Priority! Xunicipal CourtQf Record Deletions None Additions o Develop plan to acquire space for court and files. ,r Goal/Priorityt space plan Deletionst None Additionst None GcallPr,iority,t Economic pevelopmant Deletionst o Organize and coordinate presentation on Alliance Airport. Presentation completed. Additionst o Contribute to development of marketing plan for 1-35 West corridor. o Complete update of fact book and enter into computer. o Develop marketing materials for Enterprise Zones. i I 1 v ~f ti { .,J 1 t r ATTACHMENT II. PROPOSED CITY OF DENTON MISSION STATEMENT OUR MISSI R I TO BE A LEADER AMONG CITIES IN DELIVERING OUTSTANDING QUALITY SERVICES AND PRODUCTS THROUGH CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT, INNOVATION AND EFFICIENT USE OF RESOURCES. c~ r i i I 1 ' I ~ r ...yea,=e., .i:~a. M r r wr i, r ern a~trrFS4 ELEMEhT4 AND &TnATE IES FOR 1995 pROP~Z To be successful and achieve these ends we are committed tos o ~~yo~~e aitizens and businesses to halo delive~eeryices - create neighborhood and business owner organizations - Implement a volunteer program ~ I - Implement an "Adopt-A- Program" - Implement a work release program implement training programs for citizens that will reduce City costs and/or improve service delivery 1~ involve zens in mutual aoai aettina orocg ti o of the select on and dal~verv of services and nr uc s Conduct citizen surveys - Initiate a comprehensive neighborhood planning program Establish a 2000 Committee Conduct periodic town meetings Perform the function of a public information officer ~+~plement new r~ven++a sources Jdanti 4 and 0 Implement a demand side energy and water program implement a drainage utility Implement special and public improvement districts ' - Establish payments in lieu-of-taxes and other state aid 2 1 M/ I ~ PROPOSED SUCCESS~LEL ~F11 kwn STRAm"M FOR I To be successful and achieve these ends we are committed tot i o ~yol~° ait{zena and businesses to halo deliver services Create neighborhood and business owner organizations implement a volunteer program - Implement an "Adopt-A-_. programn implement a work release program Implement training programs or citizens that will reduce City costs and/or improve o Aauryg i 1 1 lve citizens it ~+++f+'al anal se*~ina orocasa Q - de i er o! services and nroduats ~ - Conduct citizen surveys initiate a comprehensive neighborhood planning program Establish a 2000 Committee Conduct periodic town meetings Perform the function of a public information officer I o • -:,e + F~ s*+.+ imnlgt^~^~ new reven++e sources Implement a demand side energy and water program Implement a drainage utility Implement special and public improvement districts Establish payments in lieu-of-taxes and other state aid 1 2 i r r' I 1 ti. f I .aMtawl 1 I } o o Become a unique and special city in the metroolox Promote unique architecture Aggressively market University activities and i opportunities Emphasize cultural attractions Promote entryway regulations and beautification programs implement greenbelt including water feature in Civic Center Park ~a Make Jazz Feat and Festival of Lights regional events 0 11 ann dig silt/ loca~esonomv by attr oa tins and exnandina u Stable e4mmercial. industrial and education enta~rises Develop partnerships with large developors = Locate a research center in the city limits Establish an aggressive marketing program including the I-35 corridor - Complete utility expansion program Implement an aggressive business retention program Complete Hwy 2499 and Loop 288 I I i 1 3 1 J w. e L , ATTACHMENT III. SUCC~$S EL•EMFNTS AND STR_ATfGIES FOR 199' , AND CURRENT CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES (AS OF JAN 19911 The following information is a match-up of the proposed 1995 Strategic Plan, success elements and strategies to the current City Council goals and objectives. Underlined items represent the proposed items and the asterisked items represent objectives and tasks that are currently part of the City Council Goals and Priorities. C". A. INVOLVE OITI12NB AND BUSINE88E8 TO HELD DELIVER esRVICEN Create neighborhood and business owner organizations ions * Public Safety - Identify and target high crime areas and establish COPS programs. I * Downtown Development - Establish Hain Street Advisory Board to advise City council regarding revitalization efforts, * Downtown Development - Restructure Hain Street Task Force as Downtown Development Advisory Board. * Neighborhood Identity - Gather material outlining approaches to neighborhood improvement, planning and identify programs used in other communities. * Neighborhood Identity - Continue outreach to priority neighborhoods) explain goals and establish trust and communication between staff and residentsr stress need for cooperation. * Neighborhood Identity - Evaluate and inform City Council of effectiveness, problems and issues that develop in East Denton. Present plan and project costs for implementing program in other neighborhoods. Implement a volunteer program * Downtown Development - Sustain the Central Business District Association's tangible support for the Main Street program. * City Beautification - Explore expanded use of probationers and other use groups to do clean-ups. 1 I ~a. UdC..e M~ 'ti r 6FH M' ~ * Interlocal/Intergovernmental Relations - Literacy Program. * Assess and Address Housing Needs - Develop a paint recycling/housing painting program with paint companies providing materials to paint homes in exchange for recycled paint. Volunteer organizations provide labor to paint homes for those needing assistance. ImRlement an „Adopt-A- Progralp" * City Beautification - Establish an Adopt-A-Spot program. Imp),em2nt a work relegss Rrooram * City Beautification - Explore expanded use of probationers and other use groups to do special clean-ups. City costs and/or meduce improve service delivery * Public Safety - Fire prevention training. * Public Safety - Continue Neighborhood Watch program. * Public Safety - Refocus and evaluate crime prevention programs, imam DARE. a * Development Process - Educate public, real estate, business, mortga a companies, title companies, developers, utility companies about development procedures and standards. * Downtown Development - Develop retail recruitment package to promote positive professional commercial image for downtown. * Downtown Development - Educate merchants and property owners on fire protection and building inspection issues. * Interlocal/intergovernmental Relations - Police and fire (crime and fire prevention) programs for schools. I 2 1 1 r T 7- i , rtc r a^o I B• bQQREBBIVELY INVOLVE QITI9EN8 IN NOTUAL G071L BETTIha DROCl88 01 THE BELEQTION1~oBY OF SERVICES AND pRCDt7CT$ - Conduct ei ~ mss- ~ ~ * Improve City Image - Conduct bi-annual citizen surveys. i ' Initiate a comprehensive neighborhood tilannine * Public Safety - Ascertain neighborhood needs through neighborhood meetings. * Neighborhood Identity - Listen to and document problems and priorities as defined by neighborhood and respond to them in best possible manner. * Neighborhood Identity - Involve neighborhood in analysis of different programs used elsewhere] select staff and alternatives neighborhood felt mighty work pin Denton, I * Neighborhood Identity - Select a preliminary approsch using East Denton as a model, * Neighborhood Identity - Determine whether to implement program in other neighborhoods and select structure based on East Denton results and potential budgetary impacts. * Assess and Address Housing Needs - Development of 4 public-private partnerships to create affordable r housing programs. * Assess and Address Housing Needs - Research zoning ordinance for impediments to development of affordable housing. i * Assess and Address Housing Needs - Research building codes for impediments to development of affordable housing. * Assess and Address Housing Needs - Research subdivision regulations for impediments to development of affordable housing, * Assess and Address Housing Needs - Make application to Urban Homesteading Program in order to utilize properties available under the Resolution Trust corporation programs. 3 I f b I~ * Assess and Address Housing Needs - Develop inventory of available properties (tax foreclosures) with potential for low-mod housing developments. * Assess and Address Housing Needs - Research participation in new HOME program approved by Congress for 1992 fiscal year. Establish a 2000 Committee Conduct periodic town meatinas * Improve City Image - Chamber of Commerce Breakfast Forums. * Improve City Image - City of Denton Town Hall Meetings. Perform the function of a public information officer * Public safety - Train safety personnel in public relations. * Improve City Image - Produce a citizen newsletter or magazine. * Improve City Imago - Produce weekly newspaper columns "City views„. * Improve City image - Produce annual performance j report. ; * Improve City Image - Tours and exhibits of City Hall and other City facilities. * Improve City Image - Develop slide show about basio City operations. * improve City Image - Chamber of Commerce Breakfast Forum. 1 * Improve City Image - City of Denton Town Hall Meetings, 1 a _i 1 { i C. IDENTIFY AND IKPLSKCXT MEN MENUS SOURCES Implement a demand side energy and water program * Interlocal/Intergovernmental Relations - Energy Conservation/water Utility programs with schools. * Interlocal/Intergovernmental Relations -FEMA participation in voluntary load reduction program. * Interlocal/Intergovernmental Relations - Most with UNT/TWU on utilities, rates, cogeneration, energy management and load management. * Assess and Address Housing Needs - Discuss the inolusion of energy effioienoy as part of underwriting and including cost of installation of energy saving equipment in mortgage loans. * Energy Issues - Monitor energy use, provide feedback and review energy audit report for city buildings. * Energy Issues - Establish energy conservation temperature set points for heating and air conditioning of city buildings. * Energy Issues - Mandate air conditioning compressor shut down on rotation for city buildings during maximum electric system peaks. * Energy Issues - support sufficient maintenance budget for oity buildings HVAC systems. * Energy Issues - Analyze use of natural gas or { propane engines. } * Energy Issues - Reanalyze feasibility of developing !E a solar hot water service. I * Energy issues - Develop more aggressive time-of-use rate. * Energy Issues - Develop and promote a full scale interruption rate and/or special/specific rates for customers with a zero peak hour use. * Energy Issues - Promote Energy services Planning efforts and tasks. * Energy Issues - Encourage a high school level conservation seminar and awareness program. 5 r S ! * Energy Issues - Continue to monitor technological developments in the area of load mgmt and time-of- use metering capabilities via cable TV. * Energy Issues - Continue development of possible air conditioning load mgmt control program. Energy Issues - strongly press for higher energy efficiency standards in codes. Inlement a dr&1naae_tti= Tmnlamant apeaial and publio improvement districts Downtown Development - Research alternative financing options for downtown development (i.e. enterprise zones, business improvement district, tax increment financing). * Downtown Davelopment - Develop long-term institutionalized funding plan for downtown district. + Downtown Development - Continue to raise private sector funds to support second staff position. • Interl,)cal/Intergovernmental Relations - Upper Trinity Regional Water District. Establish in-lieu-of-taxes and other state aid D. NE t NE ~~:QUE 1L~9 SPEQIIIL CITY TN S KETROP= _ pY;~+~+a unicua architecture 4 Downtown Development - Apply for Urban Hain Street designation from Texas Historical Commission. e Downtown Development - Market second story conversions to housing. 6 t - 1 14 !(r~~ 1 ~ ~aaressively ma*se* Un ve, +ty a flvir~oa and 11. - onpor unities - * Interlocal/Intergovernmental Relations - Regular coordination of law enforcement activities with UNT and TWU. * Interlocal/intergovernmental Relations - Library programs to cooperate with Center for Texas Studies on book review. * Interlocal/Intergovernmental Relations - Intern programs. - Emphasize cultural attractions * Downtown Development - solidify linkages with other organizations that have a vested interest in the downtown area. * Downtown Development - Promote a positive image for downtown Denton through marketing, development of traffic building media and events i.e C County seat Saturday, Holida y lighting. * Downtown Development - Assist in the promotion of existing downtown events. * City Beautification - Consider development of Denton Blooms Festival. Promote entryway regulations ana t,d„„~~•~ yroarpms * Downtown Development - Develop master landscaping/streetecaping plan for Urban Main Street area including lighting, paving, street furniture, plantings, and signs. + Downtown Development - Continue to bury utilities lines in downtown area. * City Beautification - continue to monitor and analyze Code Enforcement activities. * City Beautification - Proceed with programs for citizen clean-ups. a a, Expand litter rocnd-up program, b. Continue monthly beautification awards, 7 1 +'1 -VFW r f' C. Establish an annual beautification award program. * City Beautification - Expand and promote recycling activities. * City Beautification - Implement "Waste in Place" and "Waste a Hidden Resource" programs in schools. * City Beautification - Establish an annual award program. * City Beautification - Analyze and update litter ordinances. * City Beautification - consider "dump free" day at the landfill. * City Beautification - Continue beautification of city facilities. * City Beautification - Continue underground installation of electric lines. * City Beautification - Trash receptacle program. * City Beautification - Maintain "Certified City" status in Keep America Beautiful. * City Beautification - Reapply for Governor Achievement Award and other awards. * City Beautification - Complete Entranceways plans. City Beautification - Prepare landscape or improvement plans for entranceways and other right- of-way areas. * City Beautification - Promote Tree City USA and Releaf Denton programs. * City Beautification - Increase street sweeping. ale ant araenbeit including water feature In Civic tenter park * Development Process - Prepare a master plan for pedestrian and bikeways. * City Beautification - Monitor effectiveness of park dedication policy. 8 t v - make jazz Feet and Festival of Lights regional events E. ~Yn "*DgIpY LOCAL ECONOMY BY l1TTRACTINQ AND_ERpANDINQ G~'gI1lSLE-COMHERGIAL,i 3NDUgTRIAL_lIND EDUCATION ENTERPRISE86 - Devel n oartnershins w th large dev loge s * Economic Development - Develop/Coordinate proposals to major industrial prospects including: negotiations with property owners development of funding alternatives for roadway, improvements with State Highway Dept contacts with local and state officials to develop incentives. Locate a research center in the Gity ]imits_ * Interlocal/Intergovernmental Relations - Develop joint City/Universities economic development team, III - p{!taban aggressive marketing uroaram including the I-~5 corridor Economic Development - Contact local industries and try to attract suppliers to Denton. Economic Development - Contribute to development of j marketing plan for I-95W corridor. f t Economic Development - Develop Airport marketing materials. n Economic Development - Develop site maps and industrial site profiles. e Economic Development - Develop marketing material for Enterprise Zone. Comnleta utility exoans on nroaram Economic Development - Update utility service area transportation, planning maps. m2le en an aggressive business retention_nrog= Economic Development - Serve as Advisory Board Member for the Small Business Development Center. 9 a ,:s 3 a * Economic Development - Implement Business Retention for assistance to local business and industry. Complete Hwy 2499 and Loop as * Transportation - Continue monitoring and participating in regional transportation planning. * Transportation - Coordinate the planning and development of FM 2499. * Interlocal/intergovernmental Relations - 2499 Task Force. ,.y f t i M I 10 wr e ~ kU , ATTACHMENT IV CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION, FEBRUARY 51 1991 LIST OF MISCELLANEOUS GOALS AND PRIORITIES THAT DO NOT MATCH UP WITH THE PROPOSED STRATEGIC PLAN r*aaaaaaaaaaa,taaaaaaa*araa*aaaaaaaaaaa*a*aaaa*aaaaaa*aaaaaaaaa*aaa ~ The following information is provided to allow Council the opportunity to discuss items that did not fit neatly under any of G, the proposed strategic plan success elements and strategies. As you review the status report, you will note that many of the objectives and tasks that were developed to fulfill the Councills goals and priorities have been completed. Those items are not included in this listing. Other items are general administrative tasks that staff has included in the goals report as promoting City council priorities. These items will not go away and will be pursued during the normal operations of the organization. They are listed below. Please review the items and assess the importance of f maintaining them as goals and priorities. S PUBLIQ 87VBTY1 r o Response times - Seek ways to reduce time it takes to respond to emergencies. 0 Policing elections in Southeast Denton. o Public safety Component to Minority Relations - civil service reforms to aid in recruitment and promotion of minority officers. o Minority Recruitment - continue and expand recruitment efforts. TRRNSPORTATI0N1 o Coordination of regional transportation planning and development. o Coordinate and monitor public transportation services within the city. o Improve the level of planning and maintenance of city transportation systems. o Plan for alternative modes of transportation. 1 , r' 1 k DEVELOPMENT PROCLSSI o Streamline the development process. o Maintain and enhance management of the development process. DOIPNTONN DEVEGOP~T1 0 Develop and promote a financial incentive resource package for rehabilitation of the Main Street area. 0 Study off-street and on-street parking. o Market second story conversions to housing. o Sustain Central Business District financial support for Main Street Program. INSRaY Issuers o Promote efficient lighting systems in city facilities. 1 o Promote better utilization of city offices to reduce energy costs. 0 Promote weatherization and insulation of city facilities. ` o Encourage TMPA to lower fixed costs. o Work with TWU on cogeneration proposal. FINANCING CITY QPSRRTIONSI Note: No particular areas of emphasis are provided. overall operations are viewed as a priority. INPAOVf QITY IXAGI s o Recognize employees who exhibit excellent customer service. o Continue staff counseling and professional development sessions. usaR s~se~ o Survey, record, review and update all city user fees. 2 _~1 r I 1 _ _ROVE °ELRTIONS WITH NINORITIE81 o compile list of minority vendors that can be used by the City. 0 Increase recruitment activity in targeted minority areas. NEIGHBORHOOD IDENTITYI. Note) objectives and tasks included in match-up to Strategic Plan. INTIRLOC t RELRTIONB / LMR M HUHMR I TIOM o Continue and improve interlocal/intergovernmental relations with County. o Continue and school s Distictwernmental relations with Denton Ind o Continue and improve interlocal/intergovernmental relations with state. 1 o Continue and improve interlocal/intergovernmental relations with Federal Government. o Continue and improve interlocal/intergovernmental relations with other cities. North intergovernmental Texasov and e Texas relations 0 continue a University interlocal/ with the s University. ABASMA AND f►tfDAlAS HOO IIIG N6EDB IN DEWTONI o Determine current housing development costs and suggest methods and/or alternatives to lower them. o Research and report on opportunities to acquire funding for additional public housing for familios and the elderly. o Discuss the following with local lending institutions) utilization of current federal mortgage programs) FHA, , GNMA, FNMA, etc, set asides for low and moderate home buyers. 3 y x{t f MUNICIPAL COURT O) ROO n, o Establish a municipal court of record. (Includes all objectives and tasks.) SPACE PLANS .o Assess the facility needs of the organization and develop alternatives that will allow for the most efficient and effective use of buildings and facilities. j ECONOMIC DEVNLOPMENT o Examine policies and ordinances that could hamper economic development and suggest revisions. o Analyze what other cities are doing to attract and retain industry through incentives. o. Continue freeport exemption. o Host breakfast with the Mayor to promote economic development. o Provide support to Chamber in updating industrial sites/buildings information. o Support the' Chamber, County and universities in regional economic development efforts. o Continue reporting, monitoring and updating Denton's economic I development plan. o Develop monthly fact sheets and distribute to city departments, o Continue implementing Airport Master Plan, o identify available financing and financial resources to use as incentives, o Prepare data base of community information and local industry, o Assist employee relocation activities, 4 i t 1 yM r v ■ rl 1.[ .A f ,t C1rV6f DENTON,TEXA$ MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 78201 / TELEPHONE (9 171588.830? OfNce of the City Menapef M H M O R. A N D U M j J1 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council f FROM: Jennifer Walters, City Secretary DATE: February 1, 1991 I- SUBJECT: Agenda Work Session Items Back up materials for Work Session Items 03 and M4 will be provided under separate cover, J f„: Je for ltsrs City Sec slaty 5226M/bw Y! a ~ I a 1 14 1 Y r- a 1 1~ 1 DATE: 02/05/92 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT e3,~ o p. m i T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V, Hartell, City Manager SUBJECT: RECEIVE A REPORT AND HOLD A DICUSSION REGARDING THE PLACEMENT OF A HISTORICAL SITE MARKER ON THE QUAKERTOWN SITE (CIVIC CENTER PARK) RECOMMENDATION! F' The Historic Landmark Commission recommends approval. r SUMMARYI The Historic Landmark Commission (HLC) has approved a local historic site marker to be placed on the Quakertown site in order to commemorate the history of the Quakertown community as part of the development heritage of the City, The HLC is proposing a ceremony be held On February 2e, 1991, to unveil the site marker in honor of Black History Month. The proposed wording for the marker and draft Council resolution are attached. BACKGROUND: In the late 19th Century, and until 1921, Quakertown was a thriving African-America,: community located on the site now used as the Civic Center Park, According to reports, Quakertown contained 56 families, stores, a restaurant, a doctor's office, a mortuary and a barber shop, A city bond election proposal in April 1921 to create a City Park on the site was passed 367 to 240. By 19230 the residents of Quakertown were required to relocate, Many of the residents moved to East Denton where they and their descendants live today, PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFF4~CTED: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: i $600 Respect y u tt Prepared by: Lloyd V Harrell i City Manager Harty N. Psrsaud AICP Senior Planner Approved: Ank FRobb s, AICP Executive Directcr Planning and Development 2539x I 1 w 1 Z 1 i t UH~j QUAMRTOWN ON THIS SITE FROM THE LATE 19TH CENTURY UNTIL 1921 STOOD THE THRIVING COMMUNITY OF QUAKERTOWN. THIS AFRICAN-AMERICAN COM- MUNITY WAS FOUNDED IN THE YEARS FOL- LOWING RECONSTRUCTION AND WAS NAMED, ACCORDING TO ONE AC(,:OUNT, TO HONOR THE ABOLITIONIST PENNSYLVANIA QUAKERS, IN ITS HEYDAY, QUAKERTOWN CONTAINED FIFTY-o EIGHT FAMILIES, STORES, A RESTAURANT, A DOC• TOR'S OFFICE, A MORTUARY AND A BARBER SHOP, IN APRIL OF 1921, A BOND ELECTION WAS HELD I TO RAISE $75,000, TO CREATE A CITY PARK ON THE 27 ACRE QUAKERTOWN SITE. IN SPITE OF OPPOSP TION FROM THE RESIDENTS, THIS PROPOSAL PASSED 367 TO 240, BY 1923, THE RESIDENTS OF QUAKERTOWN WERE REQUIRED TO MOVE. MANY OF THESE FAMILIES MOVED TO THE SOLOMON HILL AND HIRAM ADDITIONS IN EAST DENTON, THE FORMER QUAKERTOWN RESIDENTS AND THEIR DESCENDANTS CONTINUE TO CONTRIBUTE { TO THE COMMUNITY LIFE OF DENTON, FEBRUARY 28, 1991 _i 1 ~ q r R+b^aa. S HLC Minutes December 17, 1990 I~ Page 3 of 4 In regards to the O'Neil Ford brochure, Ms. Abbott ? stated on the first page of the application the first j sentence should be changed to show that a citizen committee of the City of Denton worked on the rochure. Mr. Cochran stated that the O'Neil Ford brochures could be placed at the Chamber of Commerce and well as other surrounding locations. i Ms. Abbott suggested advertising in the Texas Monthly to allow individuals to send the City a fee for postage to have copies of the brochure sent to them. Mr. Cochran volunteered to write the brochure for the O'Neil Ford Buildings. Mr. Persaud asked if anyone would be interested in going to the CLG Conference next November, 1991. Mr. Barker and Ms. Holcomb stated that they may be interested. Mr. Persaud stated that he would budget for three Commissioners and one staff member if anyone else should decide to attend. Mr. Cochran stated that before the Commission goes on to the next item on the agenda fie wanted to discuss the University of North Texas building. He stated that approximately one month ago he had written a letter to Fred Pole, the Vice President of Administrative Affairs, at the University North Texas concerning the old historical building on campus. In the letter, he stated that he, Mr. Cochran, would volunteer the Historic Landmark Commission to entertain the possibility of applying for a CLG grant, at some point in the future, to help the University in receiving National Register status for the historital building. This building the University currently has plans of demolitioning. Mr. Cochran received a phone call from Mr. Pole in which Mr. Pole stated that he felt it was a great idea. He added that the two of them would most sometime in tho i future. I t fll, Discuss historical site markers. 9 Mr. Cochran stated that the Commission would join items 111, and IV, together. IV, Discuss site marker for Quakertown, Mr. Cochran stated that the Commission has boon discussing for some time placing a historical marker at Quakertown, R INOW r- ---f- --r ~ .rr Y roixnn~~ 14LC Minutes December 17, 1990 l Page 4 of 4 1 Mr, Cochran stated that he has drafted language for the marker for the Quakertown. The draft read "Quakertown, on this site from the late nineteenth century until 1921, stood the thriving community of Quakertown. This African-American community was called Quakertown according to one local legend for the Pennsylvania Quakers that settled here in the years following reconstruction. In its hay day Quakertown contained fifty-eight families, stores, a restaurant, a doctor's office, a mortuary, and a barber shop. In April of 1911 a bond election was held to raise $75,000 to create a city park on the twenty-seven acre Quakertown site. This proposal passed 367 to 240 and by 1913 the residents of Quakertown were required to move, Many of these residents moved to the Solomon Hill Additicn in Bast Denton where they and their decendants live today," II Ms, Shelton asked who would pay for the cost if the marker. Mr, Cochran replied the landowner, but in this case the Parks Department may be able to pay for the cost. If not, he felt the Planning Department may help, Ms. Shelton asked how much the marker would cost, i Mr. Cochran said it would cost about $S00 or a little bit more, He added that an ex-commissioner, 'tom Miller, has agreed to design a marker. Tom Miller designed the original historic marker. The Commission discussed the effect the relocation had on the community, Ms. Abbott moved to proceed forward to set tip an official presenta►lon of the site marker at some point during February c. 1991, to be attended by the City Council members and the Mayor, that there be an agenda item on next month's agenda of a final draft of the proposed wordingg that continues to simultaneously balance the neod• of portraying the neggative elements of the history with the need to be oconomically feasible, and also a final report concerning the format of marker as to whether It will be a pedestal style plaque or not, and how much the wording on the plaque will cost, This j motion was seconded by Ms, Shelton and unanimously approved (5.0). V. Future agenda items. There were no future agenda items discussed, It was moved by Ms, Abbott, seconded by Ms. Holcomb, and unanimously carrled (5-0) to adjourn the meeting at 6140 p.m. 2519x 1 hmgtr i RESOLUTION NO- A RESOLUTION APPROVING -THE PLACEMENT OF A LOCAL HISTORIC SITE HARKER IN THE CIVIC CENTER PARK TO COMMEMORATE THE HISTORY OF QUAKERTOWN. WHEREAS, Quakertown was a thriving African-American community located on the site of the Civic Center Park in the late 19th century and until 19211 and WHEREAS, the residents of Quakertown relocated in 1923 to create the site for the Civic Center Park/ and WHEREAS, the Denton Historic Landmark Commission recommends the placement of a local historic site marker to commemorate the history of Quakertown) NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF .'caTON HEREBY RESOLVESs SECTION i. That a historic site marker be placed in the Civic Center Park to commemorate the history of Quakertown, aRCTION Ti. That the placement of the said site marker be done in conjunotion with Black History Month. SECTION iii. That this resolution shall become effective + immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of r 1991. d BOB CASTLEBERRY; MAYOR ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY Y 1 Bye APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY 1 1 I y ~ k 7 00 p, m. -z CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 8, 1991 The City council convened into the Work Session at 5115 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry, Mayor Pro Tem Boyd; Council Members Alexander, Ayer, Dorton, Hopkins and Trent, ABSENT: None 1. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters (considered action in County vs, City), real estate, and personnel/board appointments. 2. The Council held a discudsion regarding the Denton Youth Sports Association's request to sell advertising signs to be mounted on outfield fences at various ballfielde and gave staff direction. Wayne Allen, representing the Denton Youth Sports Associattlns, q stated that the Associations which consisted of soccer, 1 baseball, girl's softball, and football, were in dire need of funds. With the budget cuts experienced, an idea was necessary to help offset that reduction. This was a way to allow the City to help the Youth Sports Associations make ends meet. Their proposal was to put advertising signs on the outfield fences at the City parks, The Association would have control over the scoreboards in the parks. Council Member Gorton stated that this issue had been addressed several years ago and issues had emerged on how the signs would be mounted, on-going maintenance, etc. Those issues were still of concern to him. Gorton asked if the Association was all inclusive - was there any one not in the Association, Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation, stated that everyone who was co-sponsored by the city was in the Association. That excluded the YMCA who was an ex-officio member of the Association, Allan state that he had designed a way to fasten the signs to the fences that would be better than not having signs, The Youth Sports Association would be responsible for the signs in ; i the area of vandalism and maintenance. Each pparticular sport would be assigned a certain fence for advertising and would be responsible to maintain the signs. j Council Member Trent asked how much income would be realized from the signs. City of Denton City Council Minutes January 8, 1991 Page 2 Allen stated that the Association felt the amount for the signs would be between $150-$200 per sign. It the amount were set at $200 per sign, the Association would realize $90 the first year in profit after deducting the amount for the materials for the sign and the second year would realize $200 per sign. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd asked if there was a conflict with the current sign ordinance. LLoyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that the interpretation was that the proposal would not violate the current provisions of the sign ordinance. There was somewhat of a "gray" area and during the revisions of the sign ordinance, it would be spelled out in detail. Council Member Alexander asked what was different with this proposal as opposed to the proposal of several years ago which was denied by the Park Board. Dalton Gregory, Park and Recreation S:erd, stated that the previous proposal had only been from one organization and the question was how to deal with the other organizations, Now, all of the organizations were working together. 3. The Council was to hold a briefing and discussion i regarding the status of various highway projects. This item was held for discussion at the regular session. The Council then convened into the Regular Session at 700 p.m. E in the Council Chambers. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tom Boyd; Council Members Alexander, Ayer, Gorton, Hopkins and Trent, ABSENTS None i 1. Pledge of Allegiance The Council and members of the audience recited the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. The Council considered approval of minutes of the Work Session of November 27, 1990, and the Regular Sessions of December 11, 1990, and December Is, 1990. Council Member Ayer noted two corrections to the minutes of December 11, 1990 and December 18, 1990, , I M r r ~ r ax•.u: tm: 1 City of Denton City Council Minutes January s, 1941 Page 3 Alexander motioned, Trent seconded to approve the minutes with noted corcection3. Motion carried unanimously. 3. The council was to have received a citizen report from Rey Tcejo regarding a sewer backup problem, Mr. Tre)o withdrew his request to address the Council at this time, 4. The Council held a public hearing to consider a petition by Golden Triangle Joint Venture to approve a detailed 1 plan and development standards and a petition recommended by the Planning and Zoning commission mending PD6, approval of a detailed Providing for plan, development standards, and conditions for 1,727 acres of land located on the I-35 service road and adjacent to Wolfe`s Nursery. Z-90-009 1, Considered approval of a petition by Golden Triangle Joint Venture to approve a detailed and development plan Planning and Zoning Commission standards. denial of the Golden Triangle Joint Venture petition.) 2. Considered approval of a petition amending PD6, providing for approval of a detailed plan, development standards, and conditions for 1.727 acres of land located on the I-35 service road and adjacent to Wolfe's Nursery (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the City's petition,) Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, presented the history of the project, From September 1988 to January 1989 a number of detailed plane were submitted, None were acted on by council duo to spostponements and amendments by the Commission reviewed a new detailed plan which was substantially ` different from the first denied plan. The mayor difference was that the bays were rotated to face the Interstate, That plan was scheduled for a July 1989 Council meeting but was postponed due to a lack of majority present on the Council, Before the Council's public hearing in July, protests from landowners who owned more than 201 of the land within 2001 of the site had protected so as to require a "Super" majority vote of the Council to approve the proposal, Council did review the July plan in September and subsequently denied the plan. The applicant requested that the Council reconsider the plan which the Council did not reconsider. In September 1989, the applicant made a building permit application which was denied partly because the detailed plan for the site had never boon approved, The applicant then 1 . f Y 1.. City of Denton City Council Minutes January 9, 1991 Page 4 filed suit against the City of Denton. The same site plan reviewed in Septembor 1999 was brought back to the Planning and Zoning Commission in November 1990 at which time the applicants made amendments to the plan. Again there were 20% of the landowners within 200, which protested the zoning application. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered both a Joint Venture petition and a City petition at that meeting. The major difference between the two petitions was that the City petition included a number of other retail/office uses. Tonight, staff had received a withdrawal of opposition from a c'. landowner whose land totalled over 45,000 square feet of area. The 20% rule thus was not in effect. At this point in time, there was no opposition from 20% of the landowners within 200' of the site. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial of the Joint Venture petition as it was amended. State law required six affirmative votes to pass that petition. The City petition did not requite six affirmative votes to pass that petition. Robbins presented a comparison of the two petitions for Council review. (Exhibit A) Robbins continued with alternatives to consider. (Exhibit B) The Mayor opened the public hearing. r George Weatherall, Cencor Realty Seryices, spoke on behalf of the holden Triangle Joint Venture. He felt that there were two issues being dealt with. One was the merit of the site plan and the other was the message coming from the community. He stated that the site plan did meet the requirements of the development standards and even exceeded it in several cases. The property was zoned under PD-6 which allowed retail/commetctal use which the proposed use met. The site plan changes included turning the bays, building an a, wall behind the property, planting along the wall. Three noise studies had been done in association with the property which concluded that noise was not going to be a roblem and could remain within the 68dB level. As a result of the noise studies, the petitioner was asking that the restrictions regarding the closing of the bay doors and use of power equipment be removed, He stated that Pep Boys wanted to be a good neighbor. The continuation of the wall to back behind Mervyn's was something they were prepared to do in addition to the wall behind the site. Since the State changed the intersection on Dallas Drive near the site, accidents were down 500, Pep Boys had done just what had been asked of them. Other users might not do as much as Pep Boys had agreed to, The message coming from the community needed to be positive. The economy in Denton was hurting, Pei Boys would bring 30 jobs to Denton and would bring dollars to Denton, I I r i ~wp r YKi~Wem L: • Y . :1'I'i~ fQ 1 ,r City of Denton City Council Minutes January 8, 1991 Page 5 Mayor Pro Tem Boyd asked if Weatherall was in favor of the City proposal with the changes regarding the bay doors and use of power equipment. Weatherall replied he was speaking in favor of both petitions with the City proposal changed regarding the bay doors and use of power equipment. Council Member Alexander asked if Weatherall was stating that the fence would continue past Mervyn's no matter which petition was approved. Weatherall replied yea.' City Attorney Drayovitch asked Weatherall if he owned the property. Weatherall replied that they no longer owned the property and would have to either get permission from the homeowners to build the wall on their property or get approval from the shopping center owner. Council Member Trent asked about the facade. Weatherall replied that the facade would be considered at the meeting. be h benged from one itetobuilding whih would be to blend in more with the neighborhood. Trent asked if there was anything in the city's petition referencing the hours of operation that Pep Boys disagreed with. Weatherall replied that those were the two conditions that be removed from the motion. Council Member Trent stated that the two conditions were the bay door closing and the power equipment operation, Weatherall replied that the hours of operation were fine, Mayor Pro Tom Boyd asked if they had asked either the homeowners or Mervyn's it they could build on their property. Weatherall replied that Mervyn's did not own the property but he was in the process of seeking permission from the shopping center owner. He stated that he would be surprised it they would not let them build the fence. Ji J ^~I i ..I _ -_--,---T-..- OFF 4 1 City of Denton City Council Minutes January 8, 1991 Page 6 Mayor Pro TOM Boyd stated that he was asking these questions as it had been his experience that unless items were tied down, they very often did not happen. He stated that what Weatherall was saying was that he really did not know if he could build the wall but thought he could. Weatherall replied that they were willing to do the approval subject to their building plan. It was a question of building either on the homeowners property or on the shopping center's property, They were willing to make the deal subject to getting the wall built. An unidentified woman in the qqudience stated that the homeowner's property stopped before Hecvyn's. City Attorney Drayovitch stated that Weatherall stated he was sfeaking in favor of both petitions. Was there any intent to withdraw the Joint Venture petition and join in with the City's petition. Weatherall replied that as he understood, there were two , motions before the Council and he would like to have both addressed. He asked it the first petition, the Joint Venture petition, was the one which required a six vote approval and the second petition would require a four vote approval. City Attorney Drayovitch replied yes. Weatherall stated that it that was the case, they would like to withdraw the first petition, the Joint Venture petition, city Attorney Drayovitch stated that the Council had the option to determine if they want to accept the withdrawal. Fred Pole, Chair-Denton Chamber of Commerce, presented the Council with a letter of support for the Pep Boys proposal with a petition of support attached, (Exhibit C) Mayor Pro Tom Boyd asked which of the two petitions the Chamber was supporting. Pole replied as the first petition had been withdrawn, the ' Chamber would be supporting the second petition, Roy Appleton, it., Chair-Economic Development Advisory Board, stated that the Chamber was working with lots of developers looking for development sites. He was in favor of the second petition and asked the Council to delete the restrictions on the bay doors and power equipment. He felt any legitimate business which wanted to locate in Denton which had the reputation of being honest and good business people, should be encouraged to come to Denton, The proposed site was not usable , a J City of Denton City Council Minutes January 8, 1991 Page 7 for single family or multifamily homes or industrial purposes. The uses left would be retail/office which the proposal met the qualifications for retail. As a businessman, he did not believe that the government, the City, the State or the Nation, should not be able to tell what hours to open/close and operate as long as it was legitimate within the building. The proposal should be approved with the deletion of the requirement for hours of operation and tool restrictions. Bob Powell speaking as a homeowner and taxpayer, stated that the last time this issue was before Council, the Council voted it down and at the same time, raised taxes. Pep Boys was offering to come to Denton to pay taxes and the Council denied them the opportunity. Since that 'time, the taxes had been raised again and also the school taxes had been increased. There was a limit to what the taxpayer could pay without help. He stated that once a property was zoned, it was zoned. It was not zoned and then when less than one-half of one percent of the people in the City did not like it, the zoning was changed. If the property was zoned commercial, then the City should listen to the other 99.5% of the people who were not saying "don't let them come,. Council Member Ayer asked Powell the source of his figures 4 regarding the 99.5% Powell replied that he took the number of people who had been in the newspaper against the proposal and took the number of people who were suppose to be in the City and did simple math. David Dunning, Golden Triangle Joint Venture, stated that this j was not a single lot development. There were many businesses in Denton that they were involved with. He felt that they had worked with the homeowners in trying to solve their objections such as the change in the rear entry for service. In these ; tough economic times, with taxes up and the economy downs a new business would be good for the City. Mayor Pro Tom Boyd asked where truck deliveries would be made, Dunning replied the deliveries would be made on the side of the building. 'Chore was no service drive in the rear of the ` building, Al Meloro, National Director tot Site Development for Pep Boys, reviewed the history of site development. He felt that Pep Boys had tried to work with the people in the neighborhood. It would be difficult to operate with the limitation of hours when other businesses did not have such restrictions, There were not many retailers who would do what Pep Boys had done for this project. w u City of Denton city council Minutes January 8, 1991 Page 8 Jim John, 'on conducted the third noise study for Cencor Realty. Cencor had asked him to determine if there would be a noise problem putting a Pep Boys on the proposed site and if so, what steps would be necessary to take care of the problem. Johnson reviewed the standards used to conduct the study and determined that the 68dB standard was very easily accessible for Pep Boys. His tests determined that an individual would not be able to detect shop noise from the proposed Pep Boys. Mayor Pro stated Tem Boyd there that was a certain amount noise at the intersection now due totheInterstate. Would the building block some of the road noise and what would be the effect of the trees and wall on noise reduction. Johnson replied that the trees would be strictly cosmetic. The wall would help with traffic noise near the wall but not much with the Interstate noise. Slick Smith stated that he had owned a Gulf Station which was next to a motel. With all the noise associated with the station, he never had a complaint from the motel regarding the wall to heat on he be able anysnoiseefrofelt m the homeowners t Sid Rogers stated that he was concerned about the number o commercial business in Denton. He was appalled at what the Pep anlocate other Dentoneen representatives was had been concerned u that there nmighttrying be to In Boys national chain considering locating in 'lenton and might not after hearing all that Pep Boys had to go through. Dean Cochran stated that he was in favor of the second petition. t'.e was in favor of the company coming to Denton and the same or to encourage proposal would capital a sales investment. nfrom others who not did e t related business. Hal Williamson, President of the Hopkins Hills/Township II Homeowner's Association, stated that Pep Boys had been working with the homeowner's for two years. He felt that there must be auit took two thors ed" years for a business something t wrong locate with the he an proptsal spot. The problem was that it was not that clear cut. The previous Council had voted the proposal down on the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, The proposal had been resubmitted and the petitioners had worked with the homeowners. They had been informed shortly before the , had that the owner of four of the homes h adjoined withdrawn his objection one hour site before the meeting. It seemed funny to him that after two years, there was no people had located in Denton super for the quality of life. iIn e that majority needed. He order ry~~(W.:SLrY~ i City of Denton City Council Minutes January B, 1991 Page 9 to keep that quality of life, the Council was going to have to choose between allowing a questionable service garage to locate next to an adjoining neighborhood. The Association was not antibusiness but was for protecting the quality of life in their neighborhood and the rest of the City's neighborhood. Mayor Pro Tom Boyd stated that the property was zoned for Planned Development. It was likely that some retail development would occur on the property. If not Pep Boys, a McDonald's, a miniature golf course or any number of businesses could locate on the site. Was the Associations opposition to any type of development or just to the Pep Boys proposal.` Williamson stated that there had been no other offer other than Pep Boys for two years and he did not understand why. The Association had had numerous meetings regarding possible development of the area and had a list of businesses as office/retail which included florist shops, physician offices. etc. Council Member Trent asked what made Williamson feel that Pep Boys would not be a good neighbor. Williamson replied that he knew the.-kind of noise generated r from an automobile repair shop and the fact that the store operated late at night and seven days a week. They were not saying that a fast food establishment would be any better. They were concerned what was going to be developed in the area. Joe Dodd felt that there would be no new jobs generated by the addition of a Pep Boys. It simply would move it from one business to another. Property values would not go up, it would further erode the inner City. He felt that the message being i sent was that Denton favored national chains located along 135 t no matter what the homeowners said about it. He felt that lip service was paid to the downtown area and the inner city. He felt that the sane kind of service was not offered to the small business already trying to survive in Denton. Gerald Riggs stated that his objection was not to Pep Boys but to the traffic situation. He felt that there would be an increase in accidents in the area due to an increase in traffic. He suggested not allowing development in that area until the service road was fixed or the traffic flow adjusted somehow. 1 I T e~..ws fR City of Denton City Council Minutes January S. 1991 Page 10 Don Leander stated that he was pro-business but had a concern regarding traffic in the area. Pep Boys would not be a miracle cure for Denton. He presented a letter mSubeln Nursery detailing a concern regarding the parking area Wolf's Nursery. (Exhibit D) The proposed development would not affect his home but he was concerned with the traffic in the area. The letter indicated that Sunbelt Nursery felt it controlled access to the parking area. If they decided toO restrict drive 1 Boyd through, it would possible damage the Pep Having to rely on that access for the mall, was extremely dangerous. Trucks off-loading in the area would create an ~J additional problem, Frank stated that he was cd with the traffic in the area. He felt the Council would make the right decision if it knew the traffic study for what was going on now and what th felt wouhaippen in ld the uitLethenf thee Councill shhad ould proceed twiand the development. Billie Harkins stated that there was a vacant lot in the area and wondered how the fence would be built on that property. As unthe load on the curve a accommodate trucks loading see there how was could in traffic. proposedi development. home was within the 2001thzoane to be Mark affected e by stated his neighbors were in favor of economic growth for Denton and did not feel that the main issue was one of economic growth. The main issue was the threat when the 4purchased his epr and the party, devaluation of the property. he knew the property would be developed and thought it would be to think of and favor cprotecting nthe neighborhood fromdatnegat City e impact l of retail. He alternative M4 which would reject the Pep Boys proposal and come up with a solution. He would like to see the issue of the property was on city eeas~ement. the wall in wall have writing. to be built on of his his did not see how the noise would not be a problem. Mayor Pro Tom Boyd stated that he understood that the wall would be built on one side or the other of the easement depending on whether the homeowners allowed the wall to be built on their property or the shopping center allowed them to built the wall on their property. Pledge stated that if it were built on the shopping center side it would not do any good because the street was the only two swimming way notth-south his property, ita would the Fright Yon the corner wall wore pool. ' 9S City of Denton City Council Minutes January 8. 1991 Page 11 Brian Scott stated that the major problem was the traffic. There were many accidents on that corner. He felt the traffic problem should be fixed first. Dana Kingdom stated that she live directly behind the proposed site. They were currently renting the house and the outcome of the hearing would determine if they bought the house. She felt that there would be noise to those who lived close. She did not know for sure but felt that the landowner who withdrew his objection owned her house. He was not involved in the CJ neighborhood and lived in Dallas. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that zoning was designed to protect the health, safety and general welfare of the public. The planned development situation would enable the City to both protect the neighborhood and still { allow the development. Robbins reviewed the various conditions that could be placed on the petitioner and the various alternatives available to Council regarding S approval/disapproval of the proposal. 'f Mayor Pro Tem Boyd stated that there was another undeveloped r tract between the proposed site and the shopping center. It had been stated that the proposed development would not affect ; traffic in the area so much that it had to be turned down for that reason. Would a future proposal be significantly limited as a result of action at this meeting. Robbins replied that Its did not think so because much of what had already been done had eliminated most of the problems. in his opinion, continued development of the area would not create a safety problem for which further development needed to be denied. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd felt that the 68dB limit and the closing of the bay doors and limited use of power equipment wad redundant. He felt that a reasonable dB level could be 1 established and then allow the petitioners to decide how to keep under that level. Council Member Ayer asked how an individual would get to the Pep Boys store if he did not take the Loop 289 exit and proceed on the service road. Robbins replied he would have to turn right at Wolfe's Nursery. He also stated that it was staff's understanding that Wolfe's did not have the authority to close the entrance/exit off the service road. -4 vmisrw Z 1w: i'.., NLF V i city of Denton city council minutes January 8, 1991 Page 12 Council Member Alexander and sparticularlye tPep he the asked e ghborhood wall and Boys property extension of the wall past Mecvyn's was not included In the list of requirements. which was out ide d the dzoningltdistrictfocunder Robbins standard replied consideration. Council Member Alexander asked the Attorney to comment on that issue. and City include Attorney suh o ait p c stated provision that an I council ordinance, she two try recommend Council to direct staff to research the issue as to whether it could be enforced. s who Council Member Alexaone whichstated Mervyn's twas property built, were ra few owned the property years ago, the same property JehatlnwthattprocessQrthere which the Pep Boys was being proposed. to try to 3work needed to be between deCthendneighborhood there responsibility peacefully and comfortably with that property owner in that area and a responsibility on the part of the property owners of t could about and that residentialvneighborhood ea. from the could, e how to talk utcome, what imwas in portantathata Cofather uncil,co egardlessarof thee ofelt it make absolutely sure that Council did everything possible to make sure the wall was built before Council approved of even considered approving either of the plans. Relating to the hours of operation, he felt it was important to set a reasonable maximum noise level. He was concerned that there be a way to enforce that. He also felt it was important that the Council did not set up a business and make it operate at a disadvantage relative to other businesses. He was interested in looking at building into t ordinance armaxiium noise on level but not necessarily making unreasonable hours of operation of of ththat ose business. issues s before felt voting was favor to or OL against the proposal as amended. Council Member Trent felt that the Council was very much aware and very much sensitive to the fact that there was a certain segment of the City which was feeling threatened Das a epartment thof ; the proposal. He stated that withe th Pep Boys, the intersection wine on record stating, amount of will still raffic". Hen asked at aP p level hwasc aware n of the tproblem at t that intersection. J ti I I \ at,aaevm 1~. 1 City of Denton City Council Minutes January 8, 1991 f Page 13 Robbins stated that he felt they understood the nature of the intersection. Council Member Trent asked if there was a time frame for finding a solution for that intersection. City Manager Harrell replied that it was not on any long range, letting schedule. The City had only conversed with the state about how to make the intersection work properly. Mayor Castleberry stated that he had observed various auto parts store and had seen traffic at those businesses but the traffic was not a mass movement. There were not huge crowds going and coming or at an auto pacts store. It was more of an in and out movement. Boyd motioned, Alexander seconded to accept the withdrawal of the Joint Venture Petition. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "nay," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried with a 6-1 vote. Trent motioned to approve the City petition deleting the bay door closing requirement and to delete the power equipment operation limitation with no limitations on the operating hours. City Attorney Drayovitch asked for a point of clarification. Was the motion to adopt the City petition with the conditions listed on pages 8 and 9 of the staff report with the exception of 4.b.5. and 4.b.6. (Exhibit D) Mayor Pro Tom Boyd noted the lack of a second to the motion. Mayor Castleberry asked for a second. Hearing none, Mayor Castleberry seconded Trent's motion. 3 i Mayor Pro Tom Boyd stated that he had a problem with the motion. It did not have any requirement that the wall be built off of the subject property. He felt that was important to the neighborhood and was essential to the program. The Planning and Zoning Commission and Pep Boys had agreed to certain hours of operation and had stated that those requirements were no problem, He felt deleting that was unnecessary and a breach of faith with the citizens. Mayor Castleberry asked if Mayor Pro Tom Boyd would like to amend the motion. Mayor Pro Tom Boyd replied no. 1 1 x City of Denton city council minutes January S. 1991 Page 14 Council Member Ayer stated he appreciated the flexibility of Pep Boys. He felt it was not an economic issue but rather a j land use issue. He did not accept the argument that the City's image would be ruined by what was done on this matter. The primary consideration was the use of the land and what was best for the City of Denton. His major concerns centered on (1) traffic; (2) esthetics - the City was concerned about the entrances to the City and this was a mayor entrance. The architecture of the building had changed, in an attempt to meet some of the objections of the neighborhood, so that the bay doors were in full view of northerly bound traffic on 135 and Dallas Drive. The garbage collection had also been moved from the rear to the front along with the loading bays; (3) restrictions on operating procedures - it was not appropriate to include those types of restrictions in this kind of an ordinance. He felt it was unfair to Pep Boys to ask them to operate the store in a manner which was different from any of their other stores. It was not good to try and "tape up" the + proposal up so that it would be acceptable to both parties. He 1 felt if the proposal was to be approved, it should be done without the restrictions on it. If the business was not appropriate for that location and operate at its normal manner, then the proposal should not be approved. t Alexander motioned, Hopkins seconded to amend the main motion to include a requirement that the wall be extended down past Mervyn's to Piney Creek. City Attorney Drayovitch clarified the amendment stating a masonry wall was to be constructed extending past the property, past Mervyn's to Piney and that that wall would be constructed prior to issuance of a building permit or a certificate of occupancy or something of that nature. The wall was to be of the same construction as was proposed on the site plan behind the proposed Pep Boys site. City Attorney Drayovitch asked Council Member Trent if his motion included the items listed on page 10 B. 1-5 of the staff report. Council Member Trent stated that his motion did not include those items. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd pointed out that the other differences between the City proposal and the Joint Venture proposal were (1) no display or sale of used merchandise, (2) engine, transmission, and auto body work restrictions, (3) building fascadb and colors agreed on, and (4) landscaping 325' more of the property. He felt all of those Items were important and had been presented as being in the proposal. Yet the motion before the Council, did not require those items. He felt the proponents were actually expecting to do those items. He felt it was best to get all requirements listed in order to be able to enforce those requirements if necessary. He felt it was important to include those four requirements along with the wall requirement. j{f vw,grr~ i' ~ M+hMKaya a. ~ 6y City of Denton City Council Minutes January 8, 1991 Pago 15 Mayor Castleberry asked Council Member Alexander if it would be acceptable to include those items in his amended motion. Council Member Alexander agreed to include those items in his amended motion if Council Member Hopkins agreed to modify her second. Council Member Hopkins agreed to the modification to her second. A point of clarification was to include the items listed on page 10, 2.b. 1-5 to the amended motion. {Exhibit E} C Council Member Ayer asked if Pep Boys did engine, transmission and auto boyd work in their other stores. Meloro replied yes they did that type of work in their other stores. Council Member Ayer stated that he had a problem with the amendment. He did not have a problem with the extension of the wall but was opposed to putting in the ordinance their plan to do an additional 325' of landscaping. It would be great if they did that, but he was reluctant to put something in an ordinance that was more demanding than the landscape ordinance which applied to everyone. He was also opposed to including the restrictions on engine, transmission and auto body work. If there was going to be a Pep Boys in Denton, then it should be the same kind that was everywhere else. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd stated that rather than take the map the City had prepared of the landscaping, the Council take the map that Joint Venture had prepared for the landscaping and put in the 325, of additional landscaping. Council Member Gorton called the question on the amendment to the main motion. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "nay," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry J "aye." Motion carried with a 6-1 vote. 1 Council Member Gorton felt that this was not an economic ` development issue. He felt it was a land use/zoning issue. He appreciated the input from the neighbors. He felt it was confusing to have two petitions and appreciated Joint Venture withdrawing their petition to simplify the process. Council Member Ayer stated that it had been suggested that the opposition from the neighbors was a new item. The neighborhood opposition was not a new item and went back to 1969 against the original planned development. 1 1 r i City of Denton City Council Minutes January S. 1991 Page 16 Council Member Hopkins stated that this was a zoning issue only. The proposal met the zoning conditions. She could not vote against a proposal when it would not stand up legally. Council Member Ayer stated that the motion as amended did not have the 20% rule attached to it. It took only a simple majority of the Council to approve the petition as amended. Mayor Castleberry replied yea. , Council Member Gorton stated that this was not the final ordinance. City Attorney Drayovitch stated ttLat this was approval of the petition and clarified Council Member Trent's original motion that he desired staff to prepare an ordinance in conjunction with the petition. Council Member Trent stated that was correct. The Council voted or. the main motion as amended. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "nay," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye." Ayer "nay," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried r with a 5-2 vote. B. The Council held a public hearing and considered an ordinance approving the rezoning and concept plan of a 14.196 acre tract of land from Agricultural District to Planned Development District for the purpose of a mixed use development on property located at the southwest corner of U. S. Highway 77 and Riney Road. 2-90-010 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval.) Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that y this property was located in a low intensity area. The Denton Development Plan, in it's policy with respect to low density areas, suggested that small scattered sites of apartments and nonresidentail uses were encouraged subject to limitations. Those limitations included (1) strict site plan control - a planned development was proposed which offered strict site plan control; (2) traffic - the Development Plan stated that traffic needed to be designed to ensure that multifamily and nonresidentail uses had access to collector or larger streets. In this proposal, access was to the realigned Riney Road; (3) Overall density/intensity - there was not a problem with the density of the proposal. The proposal did request more intensity than what was allocated to the property. A disproportionate share analysis needed to be made which needed four criteria met in order to prove that disproportionate share of intensity. The criteria included (1) the location and use relative to existing and planned development - the location was WWWJ f elf] f City of Denton City Council Minutes III January 8, 1991 Page 17 h convenient for the extension of water and sewer lines in the future. Significant drainage work needed to be done but that would have to be done before the property was developed; (2) topography and the environment - there was no unusual topography or major environmental features in the area that would contrast in the development of the site; (3) the surrounding ty lad t uses existing included n some future scattered single-family dwellings with most of the surrounding area being vacant; other policies - the requirements of the Sign and Landscaping ordinance would apply. The development also conformed to the D strict enton Development Plan Policy for entranceways as it had r. landscaped compliance frontage with cuts attractive a and the required i minimal provided with emphasis on the internal circulation of traffic on site. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd understood the property had more intensity than what was allocated to a low intensity area. That would include property off of Highway. 77. The intensity area looked at was not a narrow band along Highway 77. Robbins replied that was correct. The Mayor opened the public hearing. T. Kirk May, owner/petitioner, felt that the proposal was the best alternative for the area which met all of the Development Guide outlines. The closest homeowner in the area, Sam Marino, was in favor of the plan but was not able to stay for the meeting. Joyce Poole expressed concern with the proposed cut-off of the road and the alignment with Highway 77. She was concerned about how much traffic would be pulled off Bonnie Brae and how the people in the apartments would be able to interface with the flow of traffic. Curt Stogsdill was concerned with the traffic in the area. i There were poor road conditions ar:d the areas of the development would create more traffic proposed commercial Charles Scott also expressed a concern regarding the traffic in the area. The proposal had been before Planning and Zoning and had been told that the commission would prefer single family housing in the area. T. Kirk May was allowed a five minute rebuttal. He stated that this proposal was a new proposal and had not been denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission. He stated the City was very intent on having the alignment with Texas Instruments. One of the most dangerous intersections now was where Riney Road intersected with Highway 77. The new alignment was one of the conditions to development. I. p I City of Denton city Council Minutes January a, 1991 Page 17 convenient for the extension of water and sewer lines in the future. Significant drainage work needed to be done but that would have to be done before the property was developed, (Z) topography and the environment topography or major environmental f- there eatures inathen areanuthat would contrast in the development of the site, (3) compatibility with existing and future land uses the surrounding land uses ' included some scattered single-family 1 dwellings with most of the surrounding other policies - the requirements of therSign eand Landsc p(q) Ordinance would apply. The development also conformed to the D strict enton Development Plan Policy for entranceways as it had landscaped compliance and the frontage with provided attractive rsign equired ordnance, curb cuts with emphasis on the internal circulation of traffic on site. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd understood the property had more intensity than what was allocated to a low intensity area. That would include property off of Highway. 77. The intensit area at was not a narrow b y looked and along Highway 77. Robbins replied that was correct. I The Mayor opened the public hearing. r T. Kirk May, owner/petitioner, felt that the proposal was the best alternative for ti4a ar:a which met all of the Development Guide outlines. The closest homeowner in the area, Sam Marino, was in favor of the plan but was not able to stay for the meeting. Joyce Poole expressed concern with the proposed cut-off of the road and the alignment with Highway 77. She was concerned about how much traffic would be pulled off Bonnie Brae and how the people in the apartments would be able to interface with the flow of traffic. Curt Stogsdill was concerned with the traffic in the area. There were poor road conditions and the proposed commercial areas of the development would create more traffic. Charles Scott also expressed a concern regardin the traff in the area. The proposal had been before Planning and Zoningcand had been told that the Commission would housing in the area, prefer single family T. Kirk May was allowed a five minute rebuttal. He stated that this proposal was a new proposal and had not been denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission. He stated the City was very n having theenmost dangerouse intersections alignment th nowxa wasn where n Riney One intersected with Highway 77. The new alignment was one of the conditions to development. 1 1, fi City of Denton Cicy Council Minutes January 8, 1991 Page 18 The following ordinance was considered: NO. 91-001 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURAL (A) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 14.198 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF U.S. HIGHWAY 77 AND RINEY ROAD; PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF A CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. G Gorton motioned, Hopkins seconded to adopt the ordinance with the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendations. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 5. Consent Agenda Hopkins motioned, Trent seconded to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye,,, and mayor Castleberry '-aye.'Motion carried unanimously. r A. Bids and Purchase orders: 1. Bid #1161 - Transformer Repair 2. Bid #1182 - 500 KVA Transformer 3. Bid #1184 - Capacitor Banks 4. Bid #1192 - Loader/Backhoe & Tractor { 5. Bid #1195 - Tires 4 6. Bid #1196 Batteries 7. P.C. #10949 - Prector Turbine Service S. P.C. #11550 - J & S Equipment 9. P.C. 011569 - A & P Water & Sewer Supply j r- { City of Denton City Council Minutes January 8, 1991 Page 19 6. Ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. (5.A.1. - Bid #1161, 5.A.2. - Bid 01182, 5.A.3. - Bid 01184, S.A.4. - Bid 011920 S.A.5. - Bid 01195, S.A.6. - Bid #1196) The following ordinance was considered: 140. 91-002 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES: PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Gorton motioned, Hopkins seconded to adopt the ordinance. On coil vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. (5.A.7. - PC 0109490 S.A.B. - PC 011550, 5.A.9. - PC #11569) i The following ordinance was considered: NO. 91-003 f AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS I FOR EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Gorton motioned, Hopkins seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. i I H I ` S I City of Denton City Council Minutes January 8, 1991 Page 20 C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the execution of Change Order No. 2 to a contract between the City of Denton and Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc., and providing for an increase in the contract price. (The Public Utilities Board recommended approval.) The following ordinance was considered: NO. 91-004 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND MARTIN. K. EBY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.; PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE CONTRACT PRICE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Trent motioned, Alexander seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment 02 to the agreement of February 16, 1988 between the City of Denton and Freese and Nichols Inc. relating to professional engineering services for 7 design of the Lake Ray Roberts Water Treatment Plant. (The Public Utilities Board recommended approval.) Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that this amendment included work which would make the water treatment 1 plant operate more efficiently. The following ordinance was considered: { NO. 91-005 ' 3 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE { AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE AGREEMENT OF FEBRUARY 16, 1988 } BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. RELATING TO PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR 3 THE DESIGN OF THE LAKE RAY ROBERTS WATER TREATMENT PLANT; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE, 1 AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Alexander motioned, Trent seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd Faye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. M r , r !t City of Denton city council January 8, 1991 Page 21 E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance establishing fees to be charged by the Denton Municipal Laboratory for coliform bacteriological analyses. (The Public Utilities Board recommended approval.) The following ordinance was considered: NO. 91-006 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING FEES TO BE CHARGED BY THE DENTON MUNICIPAL LABORATORY FOR COLIFORM r= BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSES; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Boyd motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. Council Member Trent asked why the proposed fee was $12 when the State Department of Health charged only $8.00 Howard Martin, Director of Environmental operations, replied that the $12 was for the cost of labor and materials for the operation. The state received supplemental funds to do the tests and thus could charge less. r On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 7. Resolutions i A. The Council considered approval of a resolution recommending a location for the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation Landscape Grant Award. E Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that the previous evening's Denton Record-Chronicle had done a story concerning this item with the implication that this matter came before Council with no consideration on recommendations made by the Beautification commission and was being pushed forward despite views they might have had. Unfortunately that story was never asked to be clarified on the part of City staff members so that an explanation could be provided before the story was written, Harrell presented the background on the recommendation. In a recent study session, the Beautification commission presented Council with a report regarding mayor beautification which had gone on over the last year ending in the receipt of the Governor Award, The Award was to be used for landscaping along a state highway. During that the Beautification Commission, there were presentation three to the Council by sites suggested City of Denton City Council Minutes January 8, 1991 Page 22 for inclusion in a report to be given to the State. Those three sites were the intersection where the two 13518 merged, the intersection of Lillian Miller and Loop 288, and an extension of the Dallas Drive project which would pick up the northity Awapreferredy refunding and commendationcafrom that City further or to that to l the oState, that time, of sites to Beautification 288 submitted Commission, site. After that report had been submitted to the Council, several things transpired. The first was that information was received that three sites were not necessary to specify to the C!: State but it was sufficient to specify only one site for been ~encouSecondly, ntbring, they were fnoflonger problems consideration the nState the able to guarantee that they would be able to maintain the landscaping projects along interstate highways foe a three year that That Beautification guarantee Commission offered for prime d reasons time. item selection the the Lillian ithat Miller/Loop of he Council indicated ato third him that for an impact to the City for people entering the Dallas Drive locatiocommunity, Afthat be making maximized impression ter impact community would and receiving that new information and that kind of feedback, he r went back to staff involved with the Beautification Commission and asked them to get in touch with the Commission to sae if the members wanted to alter their recommendation to Council based on the new information. That was done and was only done because of the fine effort the Beautification Commission had done. The worse insult on the part of the Council or on the pact of others would be to reject the recommendation and go with another recommendation. The Chairman of the Beautification Commission was contacted and was not inclined to 1 call item. a But did lindmeeting of icate that the hadCommission no s problem with the Dallas Drive location and would not be opposed to that. She also suggested staff poll all of the Commission members to see if a majority of the commission members would go along with that recommendation. That was done and the majority of the Commissionors expressed to the staff concurrence that Dallas Drive was acceptable to them for recommendation to the City Council. On that basis the resolution was prepared for the Council which specifically sited the Beautification Commission as the recommending body. Harrell apologized to any of the their views were not considered and that their efforts Were not appreciated. r . c 5 City of Denton City Council Minutes January 8, 1991 Page 23 Jesus Nava, Assistant to the City Manager, stated that the Beautification Commission expressed an interest to work with 1 the Council to see whether Dallas Drive could be completed down to Teasley Lane in th3 near future. The following resolution was considered: NO. R91-001 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING A LOCATION FOR THE STATE C DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION LANDSCAPE GRANT AWARD; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motioned, Alexander seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. + 8. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. A. Item 03 from the Work session was considered. i The Council held a briefing and discussion regarding the status r7 of various highway projects. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, updated the Council on the existing projects in the City's bond projects and that were on the Highway Department's letting schedule. There was a ten year letting schedule with only enough money projected in that ten years to build half of the schedule. Teasley Lane - had the best priority and chance of being funded and built anywhere near the State's projections. The plans for the project would be done in June of 1991. Utility and easement documents would be done in February or March of 1991. It was hopeful that it would be let sometime in late summer or fall. U.S. 77 - the public hearing for the environmental impact statement would be held this spring. After that hearing, the environmental impact statement would be done. Clearance was expected for the fall. Six months from then, the right-of-way drawings would be given to the City which would allow the City to acquire the cight-of-way sometime in the late spring or early summer of 1992. The project would be let in 1993, assuming money was available. U.S. 380 - the environmental impact statement and schematics were being developed. The state was getting ready to advertise for a public hearing in February or March. Clearance would take four to eight months and six months for right-of-way maps. This meant it would be sometime in 1993 before the City was given the right-of-way maps and about a year later before the project was let, dependent on money. ti i E M:w;nw 1 1 1 1 ` City of Denton City Council Minutes January 8, 1991 ~ Page 24 U.S. 377 - was being done by a consultant and the schematic was now in Austin. The public hearing would probably be in spring for the environmental impact statement. Six months later would be the right-of-way drawings which would allow the City to acquire the right-of-way and move the utilities. Approximately a year after receiving the right-of-way drawings, the project would be let. There were to be three public hearings this year. About a year r year he from h that city cwould eipt, receive the projects right would of-way be ready drawings to a a be r let, assuming there was money for the projects. Loop 288 - work had not started on this project and probably would not be built until 1995. Improvements to 135 - some of the improvements are on Statels cndidates projects o were expansion. on s some letting schedules to make sure the City edules and planning documents. Highway 2499 - a draft of the environmental impact study had been received from the consultant. The final product would be taken to the Highway Department sometime in March for approval. That would be level one funding and the Task Force would be asking for level two funding and start to acquire the right-of-way. This was out of sequence but as Highland Village had a large majority of the right-of-way already donated, it was felt that this would help move the project along from Highway 407 to Highway 2181. At that same meeting with the Highway Department, it was suggested that the City of Denton and the City of Cornith jointly ask the Highway Commission to allow them to do the level one feasibility study for the last section of Highway 2499 which would come up from Teasley Lane to Loop 288 and proceed on to 135E. 9. There was no official action on Executive Session j items during the Work Session. 10. There were no items of New Business suggested by J Council Members for future agendas. I I 1 r- - -r ~ - -r .rat e City of Denton City Council Minutes January S, 1991 Page 25 11. The Council did not r^.eet in Eyacutive session during the Regular; Session. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:50 p.m. i BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS G- ~I JENNIFER WALTERS CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 3335C I f T I~ 03 p f 1 , IL, EXHIBIT A / Attachment 10 ` PLANNING AND ZONING AND JOINT VENTURE COMPARISON i I Item Planning and Zoning Joint Venture Building footprint I Same. Same. walls, parking, site I layout. I f Uses i a. Many retail/service uses, Auto parts store and auto I including auto parts and service, only. No I service and offices. muffler or seat cover I b. No or seat cover work. work. I c. Engine, transmission and I auto body work G: I restriction. I d. No used merchandise sales. 1 Number of auto I Nine (9). Nine (9). service bays. I Noise mitigation. I a. 81 concrete wall. a. 81 concrete wall, I b. Row of shumard oaks. b. Row of shumard oaks. 1 c. Says face t-35o c. Says face 1-35. I d. No power wheel/tire I equipment operation on Notes Objects to I weekends and before d. and e. Does not 1 9 am and after 7 pm. object to f. but f. I e. Service bay door closing is not part of their 1 7 pm and 9 am, daily. petition. 1 f. Peak noise not,to exceed 1 68 decibels. Building facade. I No recommendations. Addendum 2 to the Joint I Venture's Development I standards shows a build- ing elevation and its 1 colors. Other conditions. I a. No out of building as No out of building I auto service work. work, I b. Construct wall before b. Does not object to } building permit for building the wail j I building. first, but not part 1 of petition. 1 c. Proposes to extend } the wall to behind } Mervyn's, i Signage. 1 151 tall, 1S0 square foot More detail as shown in I pole sign. Sign Lighting Addendum. 1 151 tall, 150 square I foot pole sign. 1 I r ~ i A .r w msx.; S 1 Attachment 10 Planning and Zoning and Joint venture Comparison Page 2 Item Planning and Zoning Joint Venture I Landscaping. I Same as P 6 It except additional landscaping has been added along the east side of the build- ing for an additional 325 square feet more I landscaping. I G. Sidewalks. 1 5 feet wide next to All sidewalks are 5 feet I retaining wall which wide. I is taller than 2 feet. i i I } I Summary of Differences . p, 1. Planning and zoning's has more retail uses and adds offices. 2. Planning and toning has two conditions which the Joint Venture objects tot the bay closing times and the power equipment restrictions. 34 The Joint Venture detailed plan shows mote landscaping. 1. The Joint Venture proposes adoption of a building elevation and sign illumination standards. S. The Joint Venture proposes to build an extension of the wall on the residential side to the creek behind Mervyn's. 6. The Joint Venture has restrictions on engine, transmissions auto body work and prohibits sales of used merchandise. i 16920 1 y t ER■y■■ A 1 0,ase -',u-uug) EXHIBIT B Page Ten ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve the Joint Venture's petition. Staff Notes: a) If Council would approve this, staff strongly recommends that the list of other retail and office uses and parking for them be added to the ordinance adopting this petition, b) The Joint Venture indicated duringg the PU public hearing and since then that they do not disagree to the following conditions which are not part of their petition; 1) A peak noise standard of 68 decibels. 2) Building the wall behind the building on the 1.727 acre tract before a building permit is issued. These conditions could be added to the ordinance adopting r. the Joint Venture's petition. 2. Approve the City (P&Z) petition: Staff Notes: a) If this Is approved, two conditions which the Joint Venture objects to would be adopted. Those conditions are: 1) Bay door closing requirement. 2) Power equipment operation limitation, b) The Joint Venture's petition is more detailed as follows: 1) The Joint Venture's Detailed Plan includes a note to extend the wall to behind Meryvn's. 2) The Joint Venture's Detailed Plan has 325 square feet more landscaping. ; 3) The Joint Venture's Development Standards Includes a building fascade or elevation (not yet received) at this writing) and sign lighting standards. 4) Engine, transmission, and auto body work restrictions. S) No display or sale of used merchandise. 1 Page 10 ~ s { (Case Z-y0-009) Page Eleven ALTERNATIVES 3. Direct staff to prepare an ordinance adopting the joint Venture's pet€tion and including the following: a) Other uses as listed by P&z. b) Add a condition about peak noise levels not to exceed 68 decibels. r' c) Add a condition about building the wall behind the building (but not behind Mervyn's) before the build[ng permit would be issued, Staff notes: This would delete the conditions the Joint Venture objectives to about bay doors and power equipment and adds their more restrictive proposals about wall extension, landscaping, £ascae or building elevations, and sign lighting, 4. Direct staff to prepare an ordinance which would adopt a detailed plan and development standards, but not permit auto services uses, and would permit all other retail and office uses listed by the city (P&Z), 5. Den both petitions and give no direction to preparing any ordinance on this site. Staff note: Staff respectfully suggests that this is not an particularly good alternative, 6. Direct P&Z to hold further public hearings and make another report, 7. Postpone or table consideration or giving direction. i ' i Page 1I EXHIBIT C ! I 0 it C e January 8, 1991 Dear Mayor Castleberry and Members of the City Council: By design, the Denton Chamber of Commerce rarely becomes directly involved in, or takes a formal position on spii zoning issues. Because of the diversity of our mecembferc ship, we cannot appear to favor one business over another. Based on the circumstances and events leading up to the petition that has been requested by PPp Boys; however, our Board of Directors has subsequently determined that in this particular case an exception is clearly justified. In reviewing this issue, we understand and appreciate the efforts of the Planning & Zoning Commission, city staff and especially the applicants themselves, to identify and consider possible compromises which would be acceptable to the various local interests. We submit, however, that the American Free Enterprise System is a basic principle of democracy, originally founded on the belief that there are limits as to what extent government, at any level, can and should impose rules and regulations on one's right to do business. While we respect and fully support your authority to interpret these limitations, we ask that you please consider these key points: * The applicant is a highly reputable and legitimate business, which can provide a critically needed boost to the local tax base and labor force; * The applicant has already demonstrated a willingness to compromise its normally accepted operating standards in order to help satisfy local interests; * The intended use of the applicant legally meets the zoning classification of the site in question. The market and surrounding development hamper the ti optimum economical utilization of this site. DENTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ACC RID1110 414 PARKWAY P. 0. DRAWER P DENTON, TEXAS 78202.1719 TELEPHONE 817.382903 I Wrikt~, t Mayor Castleberry and Members of the City Countil January 8, 1991 ` Page 2 1111 In our opinion, any one of these points is sufficient to approve the applicant's petition. The issue goes beyond this, however, thus we offer the following: , Because this applicant is a nation-wide firm, its location in Denton can send a positive message to other businesses - of all types - across the United G= States. We feel that our city's reputation in the highly competitive, overall marketplace is at stake. + We feol that the proposed compromises, which include substantial and expensive architectural and landscape adjustments on the part of the applicant, border on excessive, and we are especially concerned when any business is limited to hours of operation that are obviously below what is commonly acknowledged as reasonable and practical. On behalf of the Board of Directors of the Denton Chamber of Commerce, we encourage you to give favorable consideration to any legitimate and legal business that is considering a site that is already appropriately zoned. Although our Board is duly authorized to act and speak on behalf of all 800-plus merwers of the chamber, we have also made petitions available to any individual who personally supports our position on this issue. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, 5F Pole Charles W. Carpenter r Chairman of the Board President 14 r 1^• l aas~ . 1~ " rears i i 1 T0: The Honorable Mayor and Denton city Council We, the undersigned, endorse and support the formal position taken by the Hoard of Directors of the Denton Chamber of Commerce during its Regular December 17, 1990 Meeting, which respectfully urges the Denton City Council to approve any zoning petition - with a minimum of restrictions - of any legitimate business, engaged in a legal business, if the s e cannot be reasonably used for any other purpose. 1. lD C r-.` 1 r 2. 3• 4. / , • 16. Cl~ 5. f e 17. c 66 GG l 1 18. 7. 3(9 a. 20.'?, ~inG 9. ~ 21. ~ i 104 22. o 23 r ✓ 12.`'i~~~~v 24. 'iZ I r , a1 k ~ RYJny~ S ` I T0: The Honorable Mayor and Denton City Council wet the undersigned, endorse and support the formal position taken by the Board of Directors of the Denton Chamber of Commerce during its Regular December 17, 1990 Meeting, which respectfully urges the Denton Cit, Council to approve any zoning petition - with a minimum of restrictions - of any legitimate business, engaged in a legal business, if the site cannot be reasonably used for''any other pu ose. 1 \ 13. 2. 14: 3 15. 4. 1 UJCCLC~ W 16 . 11 I'.. J fcr ~rss~~ 5 . &4ZI~ AL&2A 17. 18. 7. +.~[~lri n 19 . , 'IUD k'~'~t' f S. 20. W f 9. 21. 10. I'✓=. 2. 12. 24. a D ~ a+rae } r 7 T0: The Honorable Mayor and Denton City Council We, the undersigned, endorse and support the formal position taken by the Board of Directors if the Denton chamber of Commerce during its Regular December 17, 1990 Meeting, which respectfully ' urges the Denton City Council to approve any zoning petition - with a minimum of restrictions - of any legitimate business, engaged in a legal business, if the site cannot be reasonably used C for any other purpose. 1. 13. 2. 14: ld~ O 4. 5. .c 17. 6. ~~•^t'~ FCC , is. c 7. 19. e. 20. ,Dori 9. qR~l 21. d 2f r 10. 22 ~,nwin r 1 11nn I1. G/G u 23.`' " ""TCC1~, 12. 24. In: I V r 7 t ~ i • Rt V T0: The Honorable Mayor and Denton city council We, the undersigned, endorse and support the formal position taken by thq Board of Directors of the Denton Chamber of commerce during its Regular December 17, 1990 Meeting, which respectfully urges the Denton City Council to approve any zoning petition - with a minimum of restrictions - of any legitimate business, engaged in a legal business, if the site cannot be reasonably used for lothsr purpose. 1. • l /Y 13. yJ2 ' 2. ~,Gt~Jt.~LV~J WALN ' ✓ 16. 3. 15. I 4 . 114,4 c:n 40 5. 17. 7. . r 19. S. 20. 10. 1• ~f 9. 21. l~fUXJQA 22. 11. 23. 12. 24. IT 1 RGGwt~ T T0: The Honorable Mayor and Denton City Council We, the undersigned, endorse and support the formal position taken by the Board of Directors of the Denton Chamber of Commerce during its Regular December 17, 1990 Meeting, which respectfully urges the Denton City Council to approve any zoning petition - with a minimum of restrictions - of any legitimate business, engaged in a legal business, if the site cannot be reasonably used for any other p1. 13. L 2. 14. -.L tv 3. Qi _~11 15. / 4 • G CXCo~+~-r/ 14S. A (V 5. 17. 18. 9. V4" n t~~ p i 10.n„ 22. 11. t_ 23. 12. w►2 ~ 24. T0: The Honorable Mayor and Denton City Council Woo the undersigned, endorse and su j taken by the Board of Directors which ch re of the Denton Chamber e P spectfully during its Regular December 17, 1990 Meeting, Commerce urges the Denton City Council to approve any zoning petition - with a .minimum of restrictions - of any legitimate business, engaged in a legal business, if the site cannot be reasonably used for an ) other pur • `1iJ 2. 14. 12 3. 4 L4 5. 17. 7. drCAl, t~ l~ 19. 20. ~ nL e 9./ 21. J , 10. 22. , 11. /110Q 23. 12 24. r i t bfyY~ y 7 T0: The Honorable Mayor and 1 Denton City Council i We, the undersigned, endorse and support the formal position takin by the Hoard of Directors of the Denton Chamber of commerce durng its Regular December 17, 1990 Meeting, which respectfully urges the Denton City Council to approve any zoning petition - with a minimum of restrictions - of any legitimate business, engaged in a legal bus ess, if the site cannot be reasonably used for taothoir purp0 _ c a .l . 13. 2. 1 14. 3. 4. 14 ~'Ttl`_ taLL.16AlL~LL.~~._. 5. 17. 6. 7. 8. 20. 21. I 10. f 22. 11. _ z3. 12 24. T' 1v T0: The Honorable Mayor and Denton City Council V 1 We, the undersigned, endorse and support the formal position y taken by the Board of Directors of the Denton Chamber of Commerce 1 during its Regular December 17, 1990 Meeting, which respectfully urges the Denton City Council to approve any zoning petition - with a minimum pl,, restrictions - of any legitimate business, engaged in a leg business, if the site cannot be reasonably used for ny of /r ~i rpose / 13. 4r' 2.; i 14. 3. YLX/ ~lN 15. 4. 16. 5. 17. b. 18. 7 19. 8. 20 9. -21.,/ ~j C31t~ 10. ,r , r.• 22. Gt! 11. 1 23. 1. 12. ~.L G'~ 24. I f M. e +r wr k f EXHIBIT D (Case Z-90-009) Page Eight RECOMMENDATION (continued) i 4. Add the following conditions: j a. Onsite parking shall not exceed 74 spaces, Building and land use square footage shall not exceed an area whereby more than 74 parking spaces shall be required. The number of parking spaces and building and land use area shall be determined by using Article 15, Appendix B, Code of Ordinances, b. For auto parts sales and auto repair uses, add the following conditions: 1) the building shall not exceed 20,573 square feet in size; 2) shall have no more than nine auto repair bays; 3) shali not install, repair or replace mufflers or' seat covers; 4) peak noise levels created Dy activity within this development shall not exceed 68 decibels as measured from any property line which abut a residential use; 5) all automobile service bay doors shall be closed between 7 p.m. and 9 a.m., except for those periods of time which are necessary to convey motor vehicles to and from the enclosed service area; 6) No use of power driven tire or wheel repair, replacement, or removal equipment shall be allowed except Monday through Friday between 9 a,m. and 7 p.m,; and 7) No out of building automobile repair testing, analyzing, or parts placement shall be allowed, c. Tne precast concrete screening wall shall be constructed and determined by staff to be in compliance with the approved Detailed Plan and the City Code prior to Issuance of a building permit for construction of a building on the subject site. d, The Development Standards shall be consistent with the approved Detailed Plan, e. The retaining wall height detail shall be added to the Detailed Plan. f. If automotive repair bays are not used for a permitted use, they shall not be required to be constructed. Pabt, 8 s 1 (Case Z-90-009) Page Nine RECOMMENDATION (continued) S. A building may be constructed within, but not outside, the building area shown on the approved Detailed Plan, K. The number of parking spaces may be decreased below 14, if parking is provided in accordance with Article 15, Appendix B, Code of Ordinances. I. Sidewalks next to a retaining wall that is taller than two feet shall be five feet wide, 1 i ~r I r i 1 Page 9 r A, y kCa se vu -uuVJ EXHIBIT E 1 Page Ten xl ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve the Joint Venture's petition. i Staff Notes: a) If Council would approve this, staff Strongly reccmmends that the list of other retail and off!ce uses and parking for them be added to the ordinance adopting this petition. b) The Joint Venture indicated during the P8Z public hearing± and since then that they do not disagree to the following conditions which are not part of their petition: 1) A peak noise standard of 68 decibels. 2) Building the wall behind the building on the 1.727 acre tract before a building permit is issued, These conditions could be added to the ordinance adopting the Joint Venture's petition. 2. Approve the City (P W petition: Staff Notes: a) If this is approved, two conditions which the Joint Venture objects to would be adopted. Those conditions are: i) Bay door closing requirement. 2) Power equipment operation limitation, i b) The Joint Venture's petition is more detailed as follows: 1) The Joint Venture's Detailed Plan includes a note to extend the wall to behind Meryvn's. 2) The Joint Venture's Detailed Plan has 325 square feet more landscaping, 3) The Joint Venture's Development Standards includes a building fascade or elevation (not yet received) at this writing) and sign lighting standards, 4) Engine, transmission, and auto body work restrictions. 5) No display or sate of used werchandise. Page 10 i t CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES w January 22, 1991 a The Council convened into the Work Session at 5:15 p.m. In the Civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry: Mayor Pro Tem Boyd: Council Members Alexander, Ayer, Gorton, Hopkins and Trent. ABSENT: None , 1. The Council convened into Executive Session to discuss legal matters (considered action in Qyson v. City of Denton and considered action in County vs. City), real estate and personnel/board appointments (considered appointments to the Building Code Board, Community Development Block Grant Committee, the Electrical Code Board, the Hist.ric Landmark Commission, the Human Services Committee, the Animal Shelter Advisory Committee, the Blue Ribbon Committee for Storm Water Utility and the Sign Board of Appeals). 2, The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding the potential sale of the City,s commercial solid waste system and consider possible alternatives. Lloyd Harrell, i Manage ago, the Council received arecommendation from mae SolidmWaste Advisory committee that the Council had appointed to look into I all aspects of the City's solid waste system. That committee reviewed the alternatives and recommended to Council three recommendations (1) residential collection service had competitive rates and was well received by the general solid waste fcolthe City lection, recommended no was change filling residential up at a rapid rate and the council should move to acquire additional pro)erty and expand the landfill, and (3) the commercial service iihould be a system where the City provided exclusive service. Following that recommendation from the Committee and after a public hearing and Council discussion, the Council tabled the issue until staff could prepare specifications and go out for bid to see how much the commercial solid waste system would be worth to the City If the City sold the system, Council Member Gorton asked for the recommendation from tLe Solid Waste Alternatives Committee. Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that the recommendation was that the City be the exclusive provider. Council Member Trent felt that the recommendation from the Committee had since changed. 1 Y r A 1 ~ F City of Denton city council minutes January 22, 1991 Page 2 City Manager Harrell replied that the Committee had not changed 1 its recommendation. What had changed was that the Council took the recommendation, uad public hearings and then decided to take bids on the system before making any decision regarding 11 the system. The Committee never changed its recommendation. Council Member Trent replied that he had heard comments from i members of the Committee that they did not have all of the information when they arrived at their recommendation. Council Member Hopkins stated that a member of the Committee had stated that he concurred with the report as it came then but because they knew nothing was going to be undertaken immediately that that was the position for that time. Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, reviewed details u concerning the current operation of the City's solid waste system. There was the residential system, the commercial system and the landfill operation. Nelson detailed the number of employees, number of routes, annual revenue, annual volume and customers of each system. He stated that if the commercial system were sold and some of the funds not directed back to the residential system, the rates for residential service would be greatly increased. Council Member Gorton asked about EPA guidelines and long-term 1 commitment/liability. If the landfill wete closed in 2005, was the City's commitment/liability until the year 2035, Nelson replied yes that the City would have responsibility until 2035 and was one of the major considerations in the J overall look at the situation. j 1 Council Member Gorton asked it there were environmental issues imposed today that would be retroactive to the day the landfill was opened. Nelson replied that the new regulations were to have been out in January. It was understood that there would be an eighteen ; month grace period. If a landfill were closed in that eighteen month time irate, the thirty year liability did not apply. e There was a five year post-closure responsibility, Council Member Gorton expressed concern that a decision could be made which would be good for Denton today but may not be good in the future. Nelson continued that if the landfill were filled at the existing rate, a new landfill would be needed or additional permitted area by 1996. With just the city's commercial volume and Texas Waste Management's volume, escalating at the rate of 1 the City's population growth, the year would be 2001 or 2002. I 0 ` i ~ T City of Denton City Council Minutes January 22, 1991 Page 3 1 There was approximately 3.5 million cubic yards of space ' available around the landfill for additional space. Nelson reviewed the bids received regarding the sale of the system. i The best bid was from Texas Waste Management, Inc. at $1.9 million. Various options included either selling or r-..tning the system, increasing the volume at the landfill, maintaining the volume at the landfill or decreasing the volume at the landfill. Some of the assumptions included effect on the employees and their transfer and the fact that competition would keep the commercial rates tow. Main concerns were to keep the residential rates reasonably low, the availability of a local disposal site and the landfill liability. The Gi distribution of the $1.9 million for the system would include setting aside $500,000 to cover' a present negative in Restricted Assets which would be recovered when the landfill closed; $180,000 to cover 1991 contingencies, $40,000 to cover accrued vacations; $1,180,000 would be invested at 8% interest and $118,000 plus interest on the balance would be credited to residential customers. r The first basic scenario included: sell the system, get out of 1 the landfill operation as soon as possible, but still provide a local transfer station via contract or - provide a local convenience dump station, and retain the residential collection system. This would limit the landfill liability as the City r would no longer be in the landfill business. It did not solve the thirty year Yost-closure responsibility. With this scenario, it would take about two and a half years to totally fill the landfill. The rates would stay level for the next i two-three yeara and then would increase by about 5% per year. Option IA included that if the landfill were closed prior to the eighteen months and Texas Waste Management were allowed to set up a transfer station in Denton, Texas Waste management would be willing to pay the city another $1.2 million. This scenario wag the same as Option 1 except the landfill would be closed prier to the thirty year post-closure responsibility. The $1.2 million would be received in 1993 and Texas Waste Management would install a transfer station and sign a fifteen year tipping fee contract with a starting figure around 16.00. In scenario 6, the City coald continue in the present mode, competing with private haulers in the commercial collection ' system, continue to provide residential collection servico, continue to operate the landfill and, via competitive rates, continue to bring in 70,000 cubic yards of volume and then plan to expand the landfill in 1996. Advantages would be that Denton would keep on status quo, would provide a competitive factor in the setting of landfill rates aid commercial rates in the area and residential rates would remain lower in later years. Disadvantages included the City would continue to be liable for the landfill and a new landfill would be needed by the year 2003. 1 1 ~ _i 1 c F , City of Denton City council minutes January 22, 1991 Page 4 Scenario S was essentially the SWAG recommendation, where the q City would become the exclusive provider of commercial solid waste collection. The City would continuo to collect residential solid waste and would expand the landfill in approximately 1996 with additional landfill/disposal options needed by 2003. Council Member Gorton asked if the Public Utilities Board had made a final recommendation to Council. Nelson replied that the Public Utilities Board had not made a recommendation to Council. Council Member Gorton asked if, bylaw, there was a necessity to report back to a State agency. Nelson replied no that there was a requirement on other utility functions but not on this function. Council Member Gorton stated that he wanted to be sure that all legal notices required were taken cara of so that there were no last minute hitches. y Council Member Alexander asked if with Scenario IA which 1 involved the sale of the landfill, would that mean that Waste Management would close the landfill at that date and would y assume the responsibility of it and operate it until it was 11 full. Nelson replied that the City would continue with the responsibility but they would assure the City that the City would have enough volume to close the current pit, Council Member Hopkins asked if Texas Waste Management was ! willing to use the landfill and help close the landfill. } Nelson replied yes that they were willing to put enough waste into the landfill at $3.00-$3.50 per yard for the next 18 months to fill the pit. Council Member Trent asked about the location of the transfer station. Nelson seated that the City would like a site near the current J landfill. They had indicated that they may want a site north of the city closer to 135. 3. The Council was to receive a report and hold a ! discussion amending Article 11, Planned Developkxents, of the zoning ordinance. 1 S E ta'uc ,va 11 ~ City of Denton City Council Minutes , January 22, 1991 Page 5 This item was held for the Regular Session. 4• The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding proposed amendments to the concept map of the Denton Development Plan to provide for the expansion of the Special Purpose Activity Center and amending the boundaries of Intensity Areas Ml, 9, 10, 95, 105, 107, 109, 110 and 111 of Appendix A. j i Harry Pecsuad, Senior Planner, stated that in September 1988, council adopted the Denton Development Plan, That Plan showed it3 as0 intend dpecial that Purpose Center area would Activity attract by Inthe dustry airport. create an economic base to and and employment in the City provide In1990-1991,r thencircumstances had changed with relation to the Special Purpose Activity Center. In June 1990, the Texas Department of Commerce ZoneovId extended terprise zones for south along 135WD to Denton. a boundaries e site between 135W and Hwy 77. The owners of these tracts had petitioned the City for annexation of approximately 1,397 acres at this location with the objective of establishing zoning on the tracts. With Enterprise Zone designation and given the strategic location of this site in the 15W corridor, it was the expectation of the City and the land owners that a major economic development project may be attracted to locate here. In order to establish the appropriate r aggressively market the sie, staff zoning was classification and approximately 2,744 acres to the special pPurposeg Activity Center. In a related matter, Persuad stated that the western portion of the Denton Planning Area was characterized by large flood plains and large tracts under one ownership. Some of the large land owners had approached the Planning staff to discuss the future planning and development of their tracts. The Perot Group and the Henry S. Miller Trust had submitted general concept plans and were currently pursuing annexation and zoning of 1,367 acres east of 135W. The New Market Group Southwest Inc. had met with staff about a large tract west of the TPG property north of Crawford Road. RMB Realty had been pursuing a General Development Plan for a 912 acre tract located in the southeast corner of Highway 156 and US Highway 380. The inclusion of these tracts into designated intensity areas was essential in order to implement the policies of the Denton ' Development Plan. Staff was proposing to extend the western b oundaries of the Denton Planing Area. The proposed amendments to the development intensity laarea nds boundaries in that area would in promote the policies in the Denton Development Plan. Consensus of the Council was to proceed with staff recommendations. I City of Denton city council minutes January 22, 1991 Page 6 The Council then convened into the Regular Session at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. PRESENT: Castleberry; mayor Mayor Pro Tem Boyd. Council Members Alexander, Ayer, Gorton, Hopkins and Trent. ,i ABSENT: None 1 1. Pledge of Allegiance The Council and members of the audience recited the Pledge of i Allegiance. Council Member Trent left the meeting. regardingT howCBlacks feltiabout theiCity of Denton a da policies towards Blacks especially employment practices. Mr. Young stated that there were no Blacks on the Council for out the City of City were twelve designed to stated the f election tdistime tr districts in government. He felt that Blacks had only a 25% chance of being elected to the City Council. To further divide the Black political strength, the City split the Black community by using the Denton Housing Authority. This was done by building low rent apartments west of the University of North Texas - the north apartment$ Concrete of mDentonrov Village Housing s Authority in Blacks the East. At the same time, it was impossible for a Black to rent an apartment at the Phoenix Apartments. He felt that if the City of Denton's intentions were honorable, then the Housing Authority would have made low rent housing available instead of creating little ghettos all over Denton. Next, the Housing Authority put up signs saying anyone not living e in t ethatenix would be arrested for criminal trespassing. felt was keep stated tthatetheeCiattested ty told for athatiit been Blacks He All had reality, destroying r City destroyed s ten had a outheast program fixing in houses s houses and repaired two. Zoning in this area of town prohibited the building of a new home, He favored a 6-1 redistricting plan. Tais would allow a Black a fair chance of being elected. The City was receiving grants and federal ti money. All that could be stopped as the City government did not meet federal guidelines regarding the hiring of on were no the Police Blacks wo minorities. Blacks There Department with none only over the rank of Sergeant. There were no Blacks at the Electrical Plant or a Black in a supervisory position higher than crew chief on a truck. The City net up hand picked groups to meet in southeast Denton for the COPS K a i~ City of Denton city council Minutes January 22. 1991 Page 7 programs. Some of these meeting had been secret meetings attended by police officers wearing guna which intimidated i people to attend. These meetings were controlled by people who worked for the City and who did not live in southeast Denton. These meetings started at 6:00 p.m, for an hour which did not allow the working people who live in southeast Denton to attend. A police review board was needed with subpoena power as there were many cases of police brutality. He felt that the minorities in Denton needed to feel that the City of Denton was giving real consideration to minority hiring. Council Member Hopkins stated that the City had been trying to redistrict and could not proceed as the County was waiting until the census figures were available. A committee had been formed to look at the boundaries and now that the census information was available could proceed with that task. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd stated that Young's objection to Black representation seemed to be that integration had been succeeding. He did not feel that seeking a segregated community was appropriate. Young replied that he felt the City had diluted the black political strength with the district lines and with the Housing AuthoLity. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd asked Young who he felt drew the district lines. E Young replied he felt Boyd did as it ended at,Boyd's house and that the lines were drawn the year before he was elected. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd replied chat it was the plantiffIa in a law euit and that the lines were drawn the year before Mark Chow was elected. 3. Public Hearings 4 A. The Council held a public hearing and considered J approval of preliminary and final replats from Lot 41 and additional unplatted land to Lots 41A and 416, Block B, Bellaire Heights Subdivision, Phase V located at the end of Howard Court, east of Mockingbird Lane. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval). The Mayor opened the public hearing. j r. yy I•, iaf M1Y!~ . {l\ JF S City of Denton City Council Minutes January 22, 1991 Page a Bud Hauptman, Metroplex Engineering, spoke for the petitioners. He stated that behind Howard Court there was a lot which as platted was an odd shape for development. Additional property was purchased next to this lot which was unplatted. In order to create a buildable lot, the owner decided to replat and divide the property into two lots. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed tho public hearing. Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission had unanimously approved the request. Gorton motioned, Hopkins seconded to approve the preliminary and final replat of the property. On roll vote, Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and it Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance approving a Detailed Plan on Planned Development 16 and a portion of Planned Development 19 for the purpose of a mixed use development consisting of a public library, fire station, and shopping center on an 11.20 acre r tract of land located at the southwest corner of Lillian Miller Parkway and Teasley Lane. Z-90-016 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval). The Mayor opened the public hearing. William Kau£er, NCNB Bank, stated that a number of years ago, P016 included a retail development with Teasley Lane curving through the development. Since that time, Teasley Lane had been straightened out with an intersection with Lillian Miller Parkway. This had left the City of Denton with a email rectangular piece of property. The proposal would take the same development right, originally approved for PD 16, and put it in a somewhat different configuration. The triangular piece that was owned by the City of Denton was pact of PD19. The plan before the Council would move to the north, taking in the abandoned street in the triangle as part of PD16, the shopping center development approved a number of years ago. There was no request for an increase in the number of square foot of space allowed. However, it would be on a slightly differently configured piece of property. The southern end of the tract would be swapped to the City of Denton where a new fire station and a new library would be built. This appeared to be a win-win situation for everyone. It utilized a piece of property, the triangular piece and abandoned roadway, as part of his development which gave him a square piece of property which made it work better. It took a piece of property which a {ji 11 y J. . bO0'[Y.IG~ I City of Denton city council Minutes January 22, 1991 Page 9 would be very difficult fo: the City of Denton to work with particularly with a fire station on that corner. How to get in and out of there with the access and no median cuts. It also provided a buffer between the retail center and the residences to the south. Ile pointed out that what they were asking for was to reconfigure the shape of the property, no increase In development rights, the request was still the same as a number of years ago, and was as compatible now as it ever was with the surrounding land and in fact was buffered now than it was then. It also provided a piece of property that was in a size and shape that the City of Denton could use much better. Thn swap of the land was about eight tenths of an acre in favor of the City of Denton. It had been recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Rick Svehla, Deputy city manager, stated that a considerable amount of time had been spent working on 'his project. The City had about an acre of land to begin with. There was about nine-tenths acres of land which was in the old right-of-way. The Highway Department agreed to deed that property back to the City after the Hank and Trust fund relinquished the access to it. Under this scenario, the City would trade the 1.9 acres of 1 property for 2.8 acres of property. The good points of the proposal were that it moved the facility away from the corner, it provided more flexibility and enough room to get in and out of the station, and cleaned up the intersection so that the driveways were away from the intersection and large configured driveways were not neeAed to accommodate turning fire trucks. It also eliminated some median cuts and provided a site not only for the fire station but also for a new library. Mayor Pro Tom Boyd stated that the Council was considering a concept plan only. The funds for the library had not been appropriated and there had been no decision to build a library there. Svehla replied that was correct, Basically, it allowed the City enough room that if the Council chose to build a library )n the site, it could be built there. If the Council chose to Duild some other facility, it would have to come back and change or amend the PD. I Mayor Pro Tom Boy3 stated that there had been no bond funds or ti any other funds appropriated for the library construction. Svehla replied that initially there were part of the library and habouta $4008000 authorization otheabonds from had bonds voters for $1 been been sold. The only money spent out of the $400,000 was the authorization made by Council to hire a consultant to determine future needs and/or locations. J 9 t{yam a S w Y`vY JJJ. a h City of Denton city council Minutos January 22, 1991 Page 10 Mayor Pro Tem Boyd stated that today the Council was not voting to build a library. Svehla replied correct. i Lloyd Harrell. City Manager, stated that the Library Board had looked at various sites and it was their recommendation that this site be utilized to build the library which was identified for the southern part of the community in the consultantes study. The Library Board further recommended that a small portion of the $400,000 be utilized to do some of the public improvements on the site that would be needed to do at a later date. Technically, no firm decision had been made. But on the j other hand, some recommendations had been made and recommendations would he coming to the Council very shortly to ; commit some funds which would indicate that in all likelihood that would be the site of the library. Svehla stated that the 191 Committee had also reviewed the site and would be making a recommendation to the Council as the land swap came before Council. Council Member Gorton stated that the issue before Council was the detailed plan allowing for a portion of the plan to be designated to the City of Denton for its own use and determination at a later date. Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, replied that this vas a detailed plan which would allow the library and fire station to be constructed should Council so determine. Nothing else could be builL on the site without being changed. Council Member Gorton stated that a change in the PD would be on the city's request or the developer's request. Svehla replied that if the City chose to do the zoning and the land trade were made, then the City would be the land owner. Normally, the owner was the one who would request a change. City Attorney Drayovitch stated that staff would recommend to the Council that the City initiate a zoning robabl change even though the City was not legally bound to that regulation. Mayor Castleberry stated that the City was at the point and had the funds to build the fire station, it was not the same criteria as the library. Svehla replied yes that the funds were available for the fire station. t alrl~,r~ ~ s S F: iWr~ a City of Denton City Council Minutes January 22, 1991 Page 11 Bill Claiborne, representing homeowner's of Indian Ridge Subdivision, questioned that there were no numbers in the backup material regarding intensity. He trusted that they were within the guidelines of the Denton Development Plan. He asked about additional retail acreages in an area which already had the Golden Triangle Mall and the Southridge Shopping Center. In PD19 there was sufficient acreage !or retail development on the east side of Lillian Miller Parkway. He questioned retail establishments next to a school He favored office-type uses. He stated that City staff recommended not having a funeral parlor at the location but he felt that such a business would not be a bad land use for the intersection. He favored office use or medical facility use at the location. As a neighborhood, they were opposed to any auto repair business of any kind in the area. He asked that any references to auto repair be stricken from the PD. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd stated that the current PD was not office, Claiborne stated that that was posoible, it could be general retail. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd asked which alternative Claiborne would be in favor of choosing between the current or proposed uses. Claiborne stated that he could accept general retail but not I auto repair shops of any nature. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd restated that the major objection was the automobile service authorization in the PD. ' Claiborne stated that in the neighborhood meeting, there was some concern that the retail sale of gasoline would be I appropriate even at the intersection. However, realizing that this type of development usually attracts a quick-shop type of development with retail gas sales, that would be accaptable but not to their liking. Automobile repair stores at this location would be completely out of character as less than a mile away there was a complex for auto repair service. Jerry Cott, Sundown Ranch, stated that the concept of cumulative zoning and the concept of too much density and too many traffic counts did not stop before four sides around Sundown Ranch were zoned so intensely that there was no possibility for him to consider living in the area with all the cars and all of the homes and multifamily homes. In 1986 the Council allowed that when PD19 started, a wall eight feet tall of stone or brick would be built down the entire southern part of PD19 and that would, he felt, screen his property to the north. He was concerned about the language in the PD so he spent quite a bit of time getting a specific verbatim translation of the City Council minutes of that evening and of the Planning and Zoning City of Denton City council minutes January 22, 1991 Page 12 minsites of that evening. There was clearly no doubt from those, that as soon as PD19 was built in any shape, manner or form, sundown Ranch would have its screen. Lillian Miller was not there at the time and PD19 at that time, went across what j was then Teasley Lane. In 1986, the zoning was changed and he was never notified. He had no idea until about tw,,,j weeks ago that the zoning had been changed to create this current kind of situation. The City Attorney and Assistant City Attorney had told him that if it was not in the PD and his attorney concurred, that there was a different kind of situation. Now, that Bluebonnet owned the property rather than Dimension Development, it was not in their PD. He believed he had a r strong case on the issuo that because of the trouble he went to to see that City Council approve the verbatim translation of the minutes and approve the PD as soon as it would be built, it was Council's responsibility, not his, to see to it that it got into the PD. Council Member Gorton questioned what it was Mr. Cott was asking for. Cott replied that he wanted the Council to :wild the wall. Council Member Gorton replied that Cott wanted the Council to request the petitioner to build the wail. Cott replied whoever was PD19 he wanted them to build the wall. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd stated that PD16 was the shopping center and PD19 was the City of Denton. The rest of PD19 was across Lillian Miller and not owned by the City, What Cott was asking was that the wall be built on both sides of Lillian Miller. Cott replied no, that the only way he could determine how to get someone to do this was to either get Bluebonnet to put it in their PD or get the City to put in their PD. Council Member Gorton stated that a portion of Sundown Ranch was issued a specific use permit for circuit race Cott replied a race track. Council Member Gorton continued for a race track not for betting but for training. He asked the rest of the Council if they recalled the restrictions as far as fencing, set back, etc. He felt that it all dove-tailed. To whom were they asking to build the wall between which portions, Mayor Pro Tem Boyd stated that he failed to understand a° I City of Denton City council minutes January 22, 1991 Page 13 Cott stated that it was at one time one PD with no road through between it. i Mayor Pro Tem Boyd continued that he understood that. Was Cott asking the City of Denton, on its triangle, to build a wall. Cott replied no that what he was saying was the City's PD19 was considered part of the whole PD. And he was asking for one oC two things. Either Include in the City's PD the construction of the wall or cause Bluebonnet who should have when they purchased the property known that they had to build the wall as it was in the Council's minutes and notes. That should be something that they were required to do. J Council Member Hopkins asked if that was still not PD19 and PD 1 19 on the east side of the Highway would still have the requirements that were in the minutes. Mayor Pro Tom Boyd replied that what he felt Cott was saying was that it was not in ordinance form and was just in the minutes. City Manager Harrell stated that if the minutes were read, there was reference to a detailed development plan that would be filed. when that detailed development plan was filed, at that point, the wall would be shown on that detailed development plan. The property had since changed hands and was not developed, and a detailed development had not been filed. That wad the purpose of the verbatim minutes to make sure a record was made so as not to loose track of that at any point. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd asked if this was something that had to be dealt with at this time or should it be dealt with when the rest of PD19 was developed. City Manager Harrell replied that he felt it was really Councils option. He understood that one of the options was the Possibility of proceeding with this rezoning and putting it particular PD. But then, institute some kind of rezoning application for the remaining portion of the PD19 and putting that in the document at this time rather than waiting for the detailed development plan. City Attorney Drayovitch stated that there was a part in the minutes of 1981 Council meeting that stated, which was McAdams' motion, that at the time the detailed site plan for PD19 was brought before Council, that the matter would be addrdssed. She felt that the problem was that everyone thought it would come in one plan. This portion was across the right-of-way and it would be vary difficult to address and impose this requirement on property that was not here to be discussed before the Council today. She would recommend against it being imposed at this meeting. 1 1 l i a ,F gn. Rt.tryQ r1 I *8r■yJ City of Denton City Council Minutes January 22, 1991 Page 14 Council Member Alexander stated he understood Cott's position was that based on Council minutes and based on the previous process, that Cott had a legal property right to have the wall built as PD19 was completed. Cott corrected "was started". Council Member Alexander continued that his question for Cott was would Cott be satisfied, at this point, if Cott was i confident that if the rest of PD19 was started that the wall would be constructed even if the wall were not constructed at this point in time while the rest of PD19 was constructed. Cott stated if the wall were constructed all at once. Not portions at a time. Mayor Pro Tom Boyd felt that it needed to be done at a later date when the rest of the development was considered. He felt it might be a bit unfair to whoever was the owner of the rest of PD19 to impose this restriction without at least giving them the opportunity to comment. Cott asked Mayor Pro Tom Boyd if he had to wait until the second and third phases of the development. Mayor Pro Tom Boyd replied that he understood the City Attorney to say that the City could initiate a zoning matter right a way to resolve the issue. He felt it needed to be handled prior to development of the property but after notice to the interested parties. Cott felt that it needed to be in some ordinance within the next thirty to sixty days. Council Member Hopkins asked if the Council could instruct staff or make a motion to place on the agenda a City initiated consideration of the land adjoining Cott which would show what was done in the minutes and make it a part of the zoning. city Attorney Drayovitch replied that Council could direct staff to placo such a matter on an agenda for Council consideration and at that time or before t`tat time, she could provide Council with a legal updr,te regarding th/i legal issues 1 surrounding the matter. The petitioner was allowed a five minutes rebuttal. k N City of Denton City Council Minutes 1 January 22, 1991 Page lU Kaufer stated that the intensity and uses were the same as 1 before. There was no change in the nature of the PD other than a slight shifting around of the legal description of the i boundaries of the PD. He felt that by doing the shifting, it provided a better buffering of the retail from where the single family homes were than it did before. The issue of the wall was not involved in the current PD16 except for by the land swap which was needed more for the benefit of the City thsn for them, it brought them in to the fringes of the issue. Thev had never had such a requirement in the PD. He felt the proper procedure would be to reconfigure the PD and make the land ~I swap. The City had a legal right then to initiate a public ptopergzoninny piece of property in to City to determine the g• He felt the wa to approve the request as y everyone could leave happy was City facilities to be built ands thee shoppingncentert toabeobuilt with the same intensity and same uses it always had. As a follow-up action, instruct staff to an item which allow a public hearing onlce on a fu aPD19 for theure agenda, S discussing the condition dealing with the wall, purpose of 1 Mayor Pro Tem Floyd asked if the petitioner would have an 1 objection to the deletion of the specific use for auto repair. s Kaufer replied that it was not the number one use that they wanted to have but that it was an allowed use which was included in the PD. He felt that in order to make the land swap work and for them to get no additional development rights, the in. t had been in time nand nwould rather akeep in but also wanted e toD refor a solve lthe matter tonight. The Mayor closed the public hearing, Karen Feahari, Urban Planner, stated that in 1988 the city Council passed and approved an ordinance which corrected Ordinance 73-25 and 73-27 by amending those ordinances to Provide for the Development correct designation tPD16 for aaeneralcRetail use, In 1986, the Covncii passed an ordinance which approved a I revised concept plan for Planned Development 14 which reflected a mixed use development. PD16 as it was approved sshopping center could at this point in time, re a veea building permit f tl general retail type uses. The applicant had actually narrowed down the types of uses that would be permitted on the property. The intensity area. The majority of the tsites had aalreadyabeen zoned for general retail type uses. The Planning and zoning ion Comm nsi 1991iand vo co ted udnanim uslypto Opal at its meeting of January the o see a reasonable connection etweenthesgtwot developments concerning the wall issue and did not feet that it needed to be addresses at that time. Ji 1 i jr1- r W:i r'. I.M . i~ xr.tk.i ~i City of Denton city Council Minutes January 22, 1991 Page 16 Council Member Ayer stated that it was his understanding that the plan was for the ingress to the fire station to be on the north side of the library. Did the owners of lot B of the shopping area have any objections to the City sharing their driveway. Would that same driveway be used for entrance and exit of the shopping area. Svehla replied that when the trucks were leaving, they would use the driveway on the south. There would be ingress to the library and/or the fire station to the back side. 1taff had already spoken to the owners. When the land swap was made, there would he a provision that would allow the City to jointly use the driveway for the access. It would also detail a cost sharing arrangement. Council Member Trent returned to the meeting. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 01-007 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING THE DETAILED PLAN FOR 11.20 ACRES OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER O F LILLIAN MILLER PARKWAY AND TEASLEY LAND; PROVIDING FOR A IN MAXI2,000 FOR VIIOLATIONSATHEREOF;THAND PRO IDINGOUFOROAN$ EFFECTIVE DATE. Alexander motioned Hopkins seconded to adopt the ordinance excluding auto repair as one of the permittp-1 uses. On roll vote# Trent "nay,i Alexander "aye," Hopkinw "aye, Gorton nay 11 Ayer aye, Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry 'aye." l Motion carried with a 5-2 vote. Hopkins motioned, Alexander seconded to direct staff to prepare the necessary documents for Council to redefine the zoning on PD19. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye." 0orton "aye, 11 Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "ays.1' Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance approving a Detailed Plan for the purpose of constructing a fast food restaurant on a 0.6941 acre tract of land located north of Colorado Boulevard and west of Loop 288 and in front of the Target store. Z-90-012 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval). i 1 1 l~ `V\\\ WI l y ,s.~. City of Denton City Council Minutes January 22, 1991 ' Page 17 f 1 The Mayor opened the public hearing. Jim Coker, architect for the project, stated that the plan excoeded zoning requirements with respect to land use. Council Member Gorton asked the distance from the interchange of Loop 288 curbside to ingress curbside. Earl Mardeno assured that the Arby's to be built on the site would be well maintained and landscaping to exceed all of the requirements by the City. It will be well maintained and well ` run as the existing Arby's already located in Denton. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Karen Feshari, Urban Planner, stated that the proposal requested approval of a detailed plan for the purpose of constructing a fast food restaurant located at the northwest corner of Colorado Blvd. and Loop 288. The proposed h development was located in a Major Activity Center, According to the Denton Development Plan, these were the largest center strategically located to encourage the concentration of commercial retail, office, light industrial and multi-family housing. The submitted Detailed Plan reflected a fast food restaurant in an area that had been approved for retail/commercial type uses. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd felt that the ingress oaf of Colorado Blvd. r might be too close to Loop 288 in terms of safety and agreed that the distances Council Member Gorton asked for were important, Council Member Trent asked Gorton to restate his question. Council Member Gorton asked what was the distance from Loop 288 off of Colorado to the ingress into the proposed site, Council Member Trent stated that the backup materials stated the distance was e01, Council Member Gorton asked what was that equivalent to in car lengths. Council Member Trent replied about five car lengths. I Council discussion continued regarding the ingress into the site and concern regarding safety of movement at the site. Council was also concerned with the sharing of the main entrance to Target with the proposed Arby's and care cutting across traffic to exit/enter Arby's. ~ r City of Denton city council minutes January 22, 1991 Page 16 Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, state" ,hat the oraff iwi low wall designed so that the stacking of car would ccur thin the Arby's parking lot and not in the street. The entrance on Coloro was betterdfacilitate movement of the traffic Ott of the street. to y The following ordinance was considered: 1 NO. 91-008 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT DESIGNATION AND DETAILED PLAN FOR 0.6941 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF COLORADO BOULEVARD AND LOOP 298; j PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motioned, Trent seconded to adopt the ordinance. a padtesitehain athe mmal.l oarea nfor ago, the council Council had denied Gorton traffic reasons as well as external compounding of the traffic n to around the m Cln thane whatt wase present d.be He rcould not support traffic parts I anything which world compound the current traffic problem around the mall. He was not concerned with the use but was concerned with the traffic pattern. On roll voto, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye." Litton "nay," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye," Motion carried with a 6-1 vats. D. The Council held a public hearing and considered 1 f adoption of an ordinance designating the property located at 305 Mounts Street a historic landmark under Article (The Planning and 1 ZoninghCommissionicecommend d eappc val) D01), The Mayor opened the public hearing. Brian Morrison, property ot+ner, stated that the home wasHwwort01e J of the preservation due to its age, style an ngistory. y to the it would be a benefit to the City by proviliolidi neighborhood and appeal to potential newcomers. He and some of sesking to extend his the neihbors wore neighborhood. No one spoke in opposition. W Mayor closed the public hearing. ~ I r. •BJ ~I Y'~ . City of Denton city Council minutes Januacy 22. 1991 Page 19 Harry Persuad, Senior Planner, stated that the Planning and 1 Zoning Commission and the Historic Landmark Comaission had reviewed the request and both felt it deserved to bE designated a historic site. Persuad reviewed the history cf the home. After receiving historic designation, the owner of the property would be entitled to a 50% reduction in city taxes. The following ordinance was considered: NO, 91=009 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, DESIGNATING THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 305 MOUNTS STREET AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK UNDER, ARTICLE 28A OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ~ Gorton motioned, Boyd seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. Consent Agenda I f) 4' ` Hopkins motioned, Ayer seconded to approve the Consent Agenda I as presented. Motion carried unanimously. A. Bide and Purchase orders: 1. Bid 01191 - Pleat Vehicle t 2. Bid #1193 - Truck and Dump Bodies 3. Bid 01194 - Digger Derrick and Truck 1 4. Bid 01198 - High Pressure Hose Assemblies 5. Bid 01204 - 69 KV Circuit Breakers 1 6. P.C. 011704 - Advance Control Systems 1 ' 7. P.C. #11705 - Motorola + B, Plate and Replate i 1. Considered the praliminary replat of Lot 1 and additional unplatted land to Lot iR, Block A, Denton Bible Church Addition located on the south side of University Drive near its intersection with Nottingham. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval). 1 1 w r f B Mrr.:ry~ {y6i'' Y , I) } City of Denton city Council Minutes January' 22, 1991 Page 20 2. Consider the preliminar;, plat of the R.N.W. Addition, Lots A, B, an9 C, Block 1 located at the southwest corner of Lillian Miller and Teasley Lane. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval). 5. Ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts fo3,tthi Purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. #1191, 3.B.2. - Bid 111193, 3.B.3. Bid 01194, 3.B.4. - Bid #1198, 3.B.5, - Bid 01204) The following ordi:,ance was considered: NO. 91-010 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS. OR SERVICES; PROVIDING EQUIPMENT, III FUNDS THRREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Ayer motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent aye, Alexander "aye,+ Hopkins "a Gorton "aye, 11 Ayer "aye." Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry aye. Motion carried unanimously, Y "ye~ t If B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for uges of materials or equipment which are available from oneresource in G accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. ` 011704, 3.B.7. - PC 0611705) (3 ,8, 6, _ PC /r # The following ordinance waR considered: NO. 91-oll AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR PURCHASES OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WHICH ARE i ti AVAILABLE FROM ONLY ONR SOURCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE I PROVISIONS OP STATE LAW EXEMPTING MUCH PURCHASES FROM ' REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS= AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Ayer motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance, On roll R voye, rent „aaAe;," Alexander "aye." Napkins "a „ Motion carried unanimously aye," and Mayor Castleberry „ayeton M S e ~.n WtiytiTj' t City of Denton City Council Minutes January 22, 1991 Page 21 i 7 C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing publication of %otice of Intention to issue Certificates of Obligation of the City of Denton, Texas. John McCrane, Executive Director for Finance, stated that the ordinance authorized publication of notice of the City's intent to sell $590,000 worth of certificates of obligation. $200,000 of those certificates would be for roof repair at City Hall and Central Fire Station. The remaining portion would be the City's annual vehicle purchase which was similar to a lease purchase where the city issued the Certificates and the departments paid back on a three period to the motor pool those funds. The notice of intention was for Match 5, 1991. for The following ordinance was considered: NO. 91-012 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO I3SUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS. Hopkins motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On toll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton 'laye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye," Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council considered adoption an ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas, approving a Planned Development District Detailed Plan for 1.727 acres of land located on the I-3S service road, adfacent to Wolfe Nursery, The following ordinance was considered: i i N0. 91-013 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRIc,r DETAILED PLAN FOR 1,727 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE I-35 SERVICE ROAD, ADJACENT TO WOLFE NURSERY; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motioned, Trent seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "nay," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye.M Motion carried with a 6-1 vote. E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving an interloc'al agreement between the City of Denton and the Texas Municipal Power Agency, y to N.ti 1'.;Q F •I4Y .b.n 1 City of Denton City Council Minutes January 22, 1991 Page 22 Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent, stated that this was an interlocal agreement between the City of Denton and the Texas Municipal ' Power Agency for the purchase of a large circuit breaker. The breaker would be installed at the Arco Substation, TMPA had drawn up the specifications and bid for a larger number of the j' breakers. There would be a 15% savings by purchasing the breaker from TMPA. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 91-014 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN G INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY FOR THE PURCHASE 138 KV CIRCUIT BREAKERS FOR THE ARCO SUBSTATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Ayer motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. Or. roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 6 Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that the only item he had was the Work Session item M3 not discussed earlier. The Council considered Work Session item 03 - received a report and held a discussion amending pr► le 11, Planned Developments, ~f the Zoning Ordinance. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that the Planning Department had been working with the Planning and Zoning f Commission in an attempt to streamline the planned development process and make it mote applicable and easier to use. Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that in May of 1990, staff discussed with the Planning and Zoning commission, an amendment to Article 11 which would not require detailed building footprints in the first step of the PO process. There was a consensus then, that the provision of that very detailed information years in advance of actual construction was very problematic; that many PD's were often amended several times because of r1inot site plan amendments; and that in many cases, requiring building footprint and like data of such fine detail was not necessary during the first steps of the PD process, The Zoning Ordinance Task Force considered the amendment in November. They took testimony from some large landowners and from local developers familiar with PD's. 1 . F a City of Denton City council Minutes January 22, 1991 Page 23 A With the existing system for tracts of 10 acres or more, there was a two step process involving a concept plan and a detailed plan. The current requirements for the conceptual phase of a PO were extremely detailed in naturo. Sites of less than 10 acres were currently required to submit a detailed plan. If the project were approved at the concept stage, then the detailed plan had to be approved later by the Planning and zoning commission. The proposed system had a three step process. The major difference between the proposed process and the current process was that very detailed building footprints, landscape layouts would not be shown in the first two steps. The first step would be a general concept stage. It would include a showing of broad land use categories on a map, a table of lose broadly defined uses, and development standards for each use. A site analysis of existing land use and environmental characteristics would be required, The General Concept Plan would be adopted by ordinance after first seen by the Planning and Zoning Commission. There would be public hearings at both the Planning and Zoning commission and at the city Council. The second step was the development plan and would include all of the information required in the General Concept Plan but would have further details about the specific land uses on the ground and would have a more detailed table of permitted uses. Again, the Planning and' Zoning Commission would see the Development Plan first and make a recommendation to the Council with public hearings at both meetings. Additional conditions could be added at both steps. Notice to landowners within 200' of the proposed development would be give at both of these steps. The developer had the option to propose any one of the three steps. ` Council Member Ayer stated that in the proposed system, the 10 Il acre rule would not apply. Robbins replied correct. There would be no linit or. the size of the property that would like to take advantage of the zoning system. There would not be a development schedule either. The detailed plans approval would be valid for 24 months, with Planning and Zoning granting an extension up to one year, The third step was the detailed plan. There was no change from the existing informational requirements as the current system. it was approvable by the Planning and Zoning commission with appeal by the developer to the Council if denied. It 201 of land within 200' was protested, Council must approve by a majority vote. 200' notice would be given and public hearing before consideration. The Zoning Task Force recommended adoption of an ordinance allowing three steps, not requiring °footprinte" in the first two steps, and eliminated the development schedule. The task ~ force also recommended that there be no minimum development size that could be reviewed with the three step process. a~ City of Denton city council Minutes January 22, 1991 Page 24 Robbins continued that there was a concern regarding the number of public hearings required during the process. There was a potential of five or six public hearings. There were three 200' notice provisions in the process if started with the General Concept Plan. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd stated that if the developer wanted to short cut that he could go to the detailed stage. G:. Robbins replied he could go either skip step one and have the development plan approved or he could skip to step three. Many of the larger tracts could not directly skip to step three as I they wouldntt know what would be on the tract a number of years from now. The process was generally. what was wanted to do with the land, then the development plan with more specific ideas and then the detailed plan. Ron White and Don Dillard addressed the Council concerning the proposed plan. White reviewed the proposed requirements and approval requirements at each stage. He and Dillard felt that public hearings at stage three would be restricting development. Step three was an administration stage - a compliance matter because all the other details would have been worked out in steps one and two. White felt that the existing PD system was too restrictive and cimbersome to get through. Council Member Alexander suggested time lines for the public hearings. For example, if ten years passed, without development, then another public hearing might be required. Consensus of the Council was to proceed with staff recommendations of the proposal. 7• There was no official action taken on Executive Session items discussed during the Work Session. 8. New Business The following items of new business were suggested by Council Members for future agendas: A. Council Member Alexander suggested returning to a former practice of taking a break at 9;00 p,m, during the Council meeting regardless cf what the agenda indicated. B. Council Member Gorton requested a staff report regarding the issues raised by Carl Young. He would like staff to look at the issues Young addressed and provide individuals with those facts. ja s ~ ~h• 1 a - Fi 1 11 I City of Denton City Council Minutes January 22, 1991 ' Page 25 9. The Council then convened into Executive Session to discuss legal matters (considered action in Dyson v. City of Denton and considered action in County Vs. City), real estate and personnel/board appointments (considered appointments to the Building Code Board, Community Development Block Grant Committee, the Eiectrical Code Board, the Historic Landmark Commission, the Human Services Committee, the Animal Shelter Advisory Committee, the Blue Ribbon Committee for Storm Water Utility and the Sign Board of Appeals). No official action was taken.. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned. i , BOB CASTLEBERRY. MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS h r JENNIFER WALTERS CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i C 3343C { ff { J 1 { + ,y l4• r ~ 1 r r.sre,Y~ O Walter Keen WHEREAS, the City of Denton is saddened to learn of the impending retirement of Walter Keen after 28 years of loyal and dedicated service to the City; and WHEREAS, during his tenures ■ police officer for the City of Denton, Walter Keen has demonstrated a consistently helpful, considerate, cooperative, and understanding de- meanor towards the citizens of our community, which epitomizes the City's "Dedication to Quality Service"; and WHEREAS, Walter Keen has steadfastly devoted himself to mein- Cca taining the highest ethical and professional standards, as reflected not only in his own work but in the work of those colleagues who were influenced by the outstand- ing example he set for them on a daily basis; and WHEREAS, Walter Keen has consistent) demonstrated the kind of dynamic leadership and unselfish service to this com- munity which has helped firmly establish the City of Denton as the upper vertex of the "Golden Triangle"; and WHEREAS, those of us who were influenced by his leadership, will continue to ziss him greatly, and will endeavor to live by his fine example; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HUMBY RESOLVES: That the sincere and warm appreciation of the City Council be for- C mally conveyed to 'Halter Keen in a permanent manner by spreading this Resolution upon the official minutes of the CLty Council and forwarding to him a true copy hereof. PASSED AND APPROVED this _ day of 1991. I VCASTLEa i ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS. CITY SECRETARY By. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY! r ,a Iowa oy 1 DATES 02/05/91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Y1 4A TO. Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Z-90-015 REQUEST TO REZONE 5.165 ACRES FROM AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE DISTRICT RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning and Zoning Commisson made no recommendation on this requested rezoning. A motion to approve failed 2-3. A motion to deny was not seconded. I Since the Planning end Zoning Commission public hearing, landowners of more than 203 of the land within 200 feet of the proposed district have protested this rezoning. Accordingly, six votes of the Council will be required to approve this rezoning. SUMMARY: 4 The proposed rezoning is from the Agricultural to Neighborhood Service Districts. Applicants state the purpose of the rezoning is to construct a medical office park with ancillary uses such as a pharmacy and optician's shop. BACKGROUNDS t See Planning and Zoning Commisson Report PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Applicant and neighbors i r FISCAL IMPACT: N/A 1 ' j Reapec ly//submit edS G ~v Prepared by: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Ka en K. F s Sar Urban Planner App oved: 11, 4, 111il,, i Frank H. Ro ns, AI Executive Director Planning and Development , 2511x/7 W owl Wv PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT To; Mayor and Members of City Council Case No.; Z-90-015 Meeting Date: February 5, 1991 i GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Robert H. LeMond, FAIA LeMond Associates Architects ~ P. 0. Box 100366 Fort Worth, TX 76185 Current Owner: Newton Payzor Requested Action: Rezone a 5.165 acre tract of land from Agricultural District to Neighborhood Service (NS) District. Location and Size: 5.165 acres located approximately 600 feet south of University Drive on the west side of Bonnie Brae. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - General Retail (Shopping Center) South - Agricultural (Mostly Vacant) East - SF-10 (Residential) West - Agricultural (Mostly Vacant) I Denton Development Plan: C Low Intensity Acea SPECIAL INFORMATION i Transportation: z Approximately 20 feet of additional right-of-way will be required along Bonnie Brae. Only one (1) curb cut will be I allowed. Sidewalks will be required along Bonnie Brae, Utilities: There is an existing 16" waterline in Bonnie Brae. Sanitary sewer will need to be extended across Bonnie Brae frontage to Emery and tie into the existing manhole in Emery, approximately 130 feet east of Bonnie Brae. Adequate fire flow is available for up to commercial use. Ai b i i ~ I /.0+11Cb~ 1 (Case Z-90-015) Page '.'wo A SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued) Drainage: The drainage system under Bonnie Brae was designed assuming residential development in this area which is consistent with the Denton Development Plant therefore, an office or neighborhood service development of this size will require r detention. The water inlets were sized and placed based on existing conditions; therefore, at least two-thirds of the site generated runoff needs to be collected on site before It reaches the street. C- i HISTORY The requested rezoning is the first development activity on this site. :'herefore, there is no history to report. ANALYSIS The property is located in a low intensity area. The proposed rezoning is for the purpuse of constructing professional medical offices and poasibly a pharmacy. Bonnie Brae is considered an entranceway into the City of Denton. According to the Denton Development Plan, development r along major entranceways present the first impressions of the city to the public eye. The policy of this plan therefore is Lo encourage and promote good urban design to enhance the aesthetic quality and visual amenities along entranceways. y There are specific guidelines in the DDP that are required for developments on entranceways. 1. Development proposals should be reviewed to ensure adequate compliance with standards and requirements including but not limited to the following. For each item, the neighborhood services district standard or other code standard for it is stated. a. Front Yard Setbacks: Minimum front yard setback in an Neighborhood Service District is 25 feet. b. Building Coverage: In Neighborhood Service District there is no maximum bluild+ng coverage. i y w 1 Rik, SZ-90-015) Page Three ANALYSIS (continued) c. Landscaping: 20 percent of the street yard will be required to be landscaped as well as 5 percent of any parking lot on a street, and 4 percent of any internal parking. d. Signage: One (1) ground sign will be permitted on the frontage of Bonnie Brae not to exceed 6 feet in height and 60 square feet of effective area. e. Curb Cuts: According to City engineers, only one (1) drive approach will be allowed off of Bonnie Brae. f. Off-Street Parking: For medical offices parking requirements are one (1) space for each two hundred fifty (250) square feet of floor area with a minimum of five (5) spaces. For a pharmacy, the required parking would be one (1) space for each two hundred (200) square feet of floor area with a minimum of five (5) spaces. g. Design and Construction Facade: This is an issue that generally is handled in a Planned Development District. In a conventional (straight) zoning district, it is difficult to address this issue. h. Pedestrian Access: When the property is platted, sidewalks will need to be designated. 2. 'Promote integrated site design and layout which consider adjacent tracts of land with emphasis given to internal circulation as opposed to continuous strip development.' The City Council, by way of an unwritten policy, has said that all rezonings on an entranceway come to them in the form of a Planned Development. The DDP policy for entranceways places a lot of emphasis on design issues. If this case is approved without being a PD, staff will presume that not all zoning on entranceways are necessarily required to be PD's. A low intensity area is allocated 6G trips per acre. This particular tract is located in Study Area 114 which consist of approximately 300 acres. All of this study area is under one ownership and has been used for agricultural purposes as well as the homestead for the owner. The proposed neighborh,;od service development would be allocated 31357 intensity trips (5.165 x 650 31357). As per the Denton Development Plan, the total number of allocated trips for this site is 310 (5.165 x 60 a 310). Therefore, this site 1 1{`r JIRlM T' q A~ (Case Z-90-015) Page Four ~t ANALYSIS (continued) is over allocated by 3,047 intensity trips. There are 1,498 unallocated trips in the study area. Because the proposed rezoning exceeds the allocated intensity trips, a disproportionate share analysis is required. In considering the disproportionate share allocation of intensity, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council should consider the following items but are not limited to these items- a. Adequate Infrastructure The infrastructure in this area was dasigned to accommodate residential uses as well as low intensity type uses. There would need to be improvements to the I existing infrastructure in order to accommodate this type of development. (See Special Information section of Staff Report). Generally, the infrastructurj is in place to support the development, or would be requireu during platting of the property to be adequarely constructed b, Unusual Topography There is no noticeable unusual topographic features to this site or within the study area which would provide intensity trips for allocation elsewhere. c. Compatibility One way to determine compatibility is through good design. The surrounding properties are mostly agriculturally used land however, the site abuts an existing strip shopping center which is located in a moderate activity center. I d. Other Policies Strict compliance with the sign ordinance, landscape and j screening ordinances will be required on this site, if approved. 3 i The proposal violates the trip allocation policy of the DAP and would cause the study area to be in an over-allocated status. i i II 1 1 t ti , 1 (Case 2-90-015) Page Five This proposal also violates both the concentration and separation policies of the DDP. The plan states that 1 Neighborhood service Centers shall be located at least a half mile from other non-residential retail centers. The size of the non-residential centers vary from 2 to 5 acres depending on their access to a specific category of thoroughfare. Bonnie Brae is considered a primary arterial with a DDP policy standard of three (3) acres of non-residential use. Because the requested rezoning is for a Neighborhood Service District, many types of retail type uses are allowed by right. The DDP addresses strip commercial C. uses as follows: I "g. Strip Commercial - It is the intent of the plan to encourage centers of activities and to discourage strip commercial development. This :.gill be accomplished by: 1) Limiting curb cuts. ` f 2) Requiring site plan review (i.e., parking, I setbacks, etc.) 3) Encouraging diversity on major arterials ` (commercial nodes broken up by high density housing, 4) Discouraging = ) unsightly and hazardous stria} commercial by requiring sign restrictions, buffering by greenbelts and/or landscaping. 5) Limiting amounts of commercial/retail land use in moderate and low intensity areas." The proposed development adjoins and existing strip shopping center. If there could be a guarantee that f medivai offices and ancillary type uses were the only uses of this site, then there would be no violation of this policy of the DDP however, with straight zoning there is no guarantee of the specific use. If the applicant chooses to reapply for a Planned F Development District, there would be greater opportunity to reevaluate the proposed development especially relating to all of the f policies of the DDP. For instance, office use intensity trip allocation may not use more than the available unallocated trips of the study area. The applicant has indicated to us that there 1 is not enough information available to prepare a PD detailed plan. f IF r Y (Case Z-90-015) 1 Page Six 11~ RECOMMENDATION l On January 9, 1991 at the me Commission a eting of the Planning and Zoning , motion was made and seconded to recommend a this proposed rezoning; fa , failed, however, by a vote of 2-3 the motionl Another motion was then made to recommend denial. The motion was not seconded; therefore, the Planning and Zoning Commission did not make a recommendation on Z-90-015. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition and request staff prepare the zoning ordinance, 2. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS I, Location Map 2. LUMIS IntensEty Area No. 114 and Map 2sllx i i fi 1 i i i J 6 ~N ATTACHMENT 1 e PEARLY/CHNISiOk IDOIilONISkOPPING CENTER) E WVVER7P7Y APIY£ VJJlO ' ITE 0 oo Wo L OCA TION MAP 1~-lsoo~ I I 1 j J i i I , i rLs MR_9} i ~ avi xe~ ATTACHMENT 2 , INTIKBITT AYISA + 114 1125 29953 Acall • SOUNDART DINORITTION 1 Easts Bonnie Bras and a boundary line following the existing. GA zoning Neett 1-35 North: University Drive (Hwy 380) Souths Scripture r I' k Ell `I I HIGHVAI i18 i , f r n ~ y As OWA w eCA1ITO~t r i at sar ! ~ ~aALs 0 1000 2000 1 ~ 2-1 1 . ~ E + ~I } E" nrµ w. v II 1 LAho USE MANAGEMENT INPORMATION SYSTEM + PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARIXM CITY OF DENTON _---a------------------------------a--_a-------r-----------a-_-------_-__---__-- Intensity area 1s 114 Type: [ov Intensity trips/Ac 6o Traffic survey zoness 6675 Boundary Descriptions Northe University Dr. seethe SeriFtore Dates 11/29/89 Eac~ts Bonnie Bras and boundary of GR zoning waste I-35 LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING, PLANNFD DEVELOPMENTS CATEGORY I-NITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITI ACRES UNITS INTENSIT a-_____-_.._a.-------- SF-16 < 1 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 SP-10>16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SP-7>10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Liss sr-7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MOB.MOMES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DUPLEX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Mr-R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MF-162 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 COM/RET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OFFICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INDUSTRY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSTI'NAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C PARKS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R/0/SPACE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRANSPORT 0 24.12 0 0 0 0 0 0 AGRIC. 0 0 0 274.4 0 0 0 0 VACANT _-0- 274.4 a-------------------------------0 0 0 I 274.4 0 0 ---_----0--_--•-_0 TOTAL 1 299.53 10 -a-_a_----•------------------•-__-__----_-_---•--_--------------------.__........ INTENSITY CALCULATIONS ` (1 Intensity area total trips 299.53 times 60 17972 (2 Trips allocated to existing land uses (built) 10 3 Trips allocated to current zoning incl. P Ds (not built) 0 I 1 ((4 Tripps allocated to vacant lands not zoned plus A11gqrric. zoning 16464 ` 5 Estiaated unallocated intensity trips (1)slime (2)+(3)+(4 1498 (((6 Percentaga of intensity trips allocated 92 rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.rrr_..•ra.•..-.r ...............................r.._. f t z-2 w- ; s . 6 n} lfi~ D P&Z Minutes R A !S January 9, 1991 Page 9 Mr. Morris replied that the definitions are to define uses and not expand them. Adding uses is questio-able if they were not included in the public notice. It does not appear that a recreation center was advertised. Mr. Robbins said that from reading the notice, he does not believe that people would have known other than a library was proposed. There is the same problem if the building is labeled "X". The issue is not the owner. He suggested approving the site plan with the 17br_ry and then amending at a later date. Ms. Brock withdrew her motion. Mr. Appleton asked who interprets the definitions of permitted uses. Ms. Feshari said that City staff normally does so. If there are questions, the matter would be brought to the commission for classification of the use. r Mr. Appleton moved to recommend approval of Z-90-016 as recormended by staff. Seconded by Mr. Glasscock and unanimously carried (6-0). Staff report for plat of site: Mr. Yost stated that the plat is for the same piece of land as the zoning case. The Development Review Committee recommends approval. It was moved by Ms. Morgan, seconded by Mr. Appleton, and unanimously carried (6-0) to recommend approval of the preliminary plat of the R.N.W. Addition, Block 1, Lots A, B, and C. [-VIZ. VIZ. Hold a public hearing and consider rezoning a 5.165 acre j tract of land from Agriculture District to Neighborhood Service District on property located approximately 600 feet south of University Drive on the west side of Bonnie Bras. Ms. Brock had a conflict of interest and excused herself from the discussion. The Staff Report (attached) and slides were presented by Ms. Feshari. r y. ti P&Z Minutes T January 9, 1991 D RAF Page 10 Petitioner: Robert LeMond, Box 100366, Fort Worth, 76185, stated that he is hear to urge the Cotmmission's approval of Z-90-015. He represents both J. Newon Rayzor, tithe seller of this property, and a group of Denton physicians that intend to purchase the property for their use in building medical offices for their own practices. He has been a licensed architect and urban planner for 30 years. His architecture degree is from Texas Tech University and he has a Masters in Urban Planner from the University of Heidelberg. He is honored to be a former member of the Board of Directors and a fellow in the American Institute of Architects. He is honored to represent both the buyer and the seller in this deal. The purchasers have selected him to accomplish the rezoning from Agriculture to Neighborhood Services District. He represents Mr. Rayzor also in the sale. It is a usage that both parties are earnestly j seeking. Representing the seller, he asked the Commission to refer to the general development plan he handed out. He clarified the location of the site on the plan. The drawing circumscribes Hillview Ranch, the Rayzor home property and the showplace of the Longhorn Cattle Breeders Association. Hillview Ranch contains approximately 300 acres gross at the j present time. The site under consideration is in the northeast corner of the existing ranch, and it contains 5.165 acres or 225,000 square feet of land. It is to be used as a garden medical center, doctors offices for a support the pproximately 12-20 practicing physicians and a pharmacy to physicians and aepharmacist hinvolved at currently ttime. 2 Dr. DeHolt is in the audience and can answer questions. Kent Fergueson, the developer, was here earlier but had to leave to catch a flight to Austin. There are two significant items that need to be pointed out on the Development Plan. They are HCA and Westgate hospitals and are the reason for the selection of this particular site. Several sites have been considered but the buyers have chosen this one which is almost exactly between the two hospitals. It gives them the best opportunity to go both directions. Mr. LeMond said that he would like to rebut the staff report prepared by Ms. Feshari. The analysis refers to Bonnie Bare as an entranceway to the city. He showed slides of the west side entranceways to Denton. The site is at the rear of the Skaggs commercial center. Ho said that he does not divagree with the Denton Development Plan (DDP) but at some point Bonnie Brae should not be considered an entranceway if you are going to have the restrictions for planned development. r I ` 1 r, Piz Minutes D RR January 9, 1991 A F T Page 11 He would consider Oak Street and University Drive entranceways to the city. Once past Oak and Scripture and then heading further north Bonnie Brae ought not be considered an entranceway. The actual development will be about 30,000 square feet in doctors offices and the pharmacy will only be 1500 square feet of the development. It will mostly sell prescriptions from the center. Mr. Le Mond described the parking spaces and driveway dimensions. He 6: said that the staff intensity calculations are based on the worst case scenario of the whole center developing as retail so this development will not have that big of an impact on i not nfrastructure and would not use as much intensity. They do that al PD should ha dle the design of the project instead suggests merely a rezoning to Neighborhood Service. Doctors offices are not ugly, dirty, dark, or difficult to get to. They do not exist because patients would not go there. Things that are in the practical world will end up governing the type of facility that will be built. These are things that you can bank on and trust in your own mind. There will be about 5-7 3,000 square foot buildings in the garden center. 'They will be about 3 and one-half stories high and will be additions to the Denton tax rolls. This will not seem so high because of the surrounding hill. It will be a marvelous transition scaled, well-designed buildings to the back of the shopping center and any other development that might come to the south and more particularly, that development and the neighborhoods to the east. It will be a nice buffer of 5-7 residential scale buildings. construction and scale will be of a residential nature. There will be landscaping and easy access. It is a quite day time use. This development will be a nice cover of the back of the strip center vith its dumpeter, doors, and down spouts. Each building will have well-detailed brick masonry facades with composition shingle paitched roofs, access. He lovely hopes landscaping, he has abundant answered parkingr and design questions to satisfaction. He added that these doctors have for many years been outstanding citizens of Denton and are not going to permit anything that they are not proud to own to be constructed in their name. Secondly, they are not purchasing this very expensive land to flip it for resale and quick profit. What he has detailed is what the city is get, planned allocation takes the worst ecase pscenario because the staff is forced to do this kind of stuff. The entire site is covered with retail buildings in the scenario. P&Z Minutes January 9, 1991 Page 12 The infrastructure is generally in place for the development or would be required to during platting. There is not a: better place in Denton to deal with new streets and roads than along Bonnie Brae which will ultimately be four lane to Scripture, The compatibility code and policies are handled during the existing DRC process and the requirements for a building permit, so having the proper signage, landscaping, setbacks, etc. will be handled in permits which come along after the zoning is approved. Concentration, separation, th(. size of the development, and the reference to strip commercial are all brought about by the 1500 square foot pharmacy. Less than 5% of the net area of the buildable project will be used for the pharmacy. Yet it is the reason for the excessive trip count, the concentration and separation issues, and their even having to deal with commercial/retail uses. He pointed out that doctors offices and an ancillary use of one pharmacy at this time. Perhaps in the future there might be an optical shop to go along with the opthomologist office. A frame shop takes about 900 square feet. It is a very close knit, small thing where you pick out your frames, the doctor sends off the prescription, and the patient returns to pick them up. It is not a big lab in-house like Pearl vision center or one of those that are advertised on television. All these things are really for the convenience of the patients using the medical center, not a commercial/retail use like the staff is forced to present in their worst case scenario. Staff is often in a position that they are not allowed to weigh facts and interpret the information, they have to follow certain guidelines for their presentations. The guarantee that this site will develop as stated is in the proud owners, 12 outstanding professional men at this time, probably more to join them, they would probably all affirm that pledge to the city. They are not interested in buying this land to put up a cleaner's or mortuary, or anything also than what has been presented. They want to provide for their own medical offi,:es halfway between the two hospitals. Mr. Appleton asked about the buffering along the southern edge of the project. Mr. LeMond replied that a substantial berm and fence are in the sale contract so that there will not be cattle getting in to the development. Mr. Engelbrecht asked why PD zoning was not pursued since the many details required in a site plan seem to have been worked out. A P&2 Minutes DRAFT January 9, 1991 Page 13 Mr. LeMond answered that there are 10-20 physicians involved. The developer is from Austin and the architect is from Dallas. A PD takes too much design time and money up front and is contingent on the zoning. They have not worked out yet where the sidewalks and other things will be. Mr. Engelbrecht stated that an attempt is being made to develop doctors offices but the layout is still undetermined. There is no guarantee that the professionals involved will still be in Denton in a year. This zoning will allow uses that he is concerned about. He asked if the petitioner would be willing to prohib some uses. f i Mr. LeMond replied that he is not sure it would be legal. 1 They would not mind excluding some use as long as they are permitted to have ancillary uses. Mr. Morris stated that the petition is for neighborhood services and the uses that are permitted in that district as a right. Restrictions cannot be placed on those uses without changing the zoning ordinance. Mr. Appleton noted that all zoning is open ended. Mr. LeMond noted that a PD is also. It can be amended time and again. Dr. Don Holt, stated that the physicians involved in this project are mainly the doctors associated with Flow Hospital. When it closed they were left out of the traffic pattern. They want this development to be a show place. Mr. Glasscock asked if the financing has been arranged. Dr. Holt said yes. 1 Mr. Engelbrecht said that he knows it is not the intent, but if the zoning change is permitted, undesirable land uses would be legally allowed in future. Dr. Holt said that the future cannot be predicted. They do not want undesirable uses either. He does not want a mortuary next to his office. The doctors will have restrictions among themselves, A lawyer will work out the details is someone wants to sell their office unit. They are individual practitioners, not a corporation or partnership. The arrangement will be like a condominium. Mr. Xamman asked if a PD would bi unbearable. 1 I r ti P&Z Mies Januaryu9, 1991 DRAFT Page 14 Dr. Holt replied that he is not familiar with the terms. Mr. LeMond and the developer forsaw problems with the PD zoning. Mr. Engelbrecht asked if he would be satisfied to get the office. Dr. Holt said yes. s In favor: Jesse Coffey stated that he does not know Mr. i LeMond. He knows Mr. Rayzor but does not like him. He said that the Commission is not talking to fancy people from Dallas. They are talking to Dr. Holt, whose family has been in Denton for years. He has more credations than the whole Planning Department. He said that the commission should not give him a hard time they should just zone it. Recommendation: Ms. Feshari stated that staff is recommending denial. j Mr. Appleton stated that the vast majority of trips are allocated to undeveloped land. Mr. Persaud explained that vacant land in low intensity areas are allocated 60 trips per acre. That does not prevent other uses and saves some intensity for when the vacant land does develop. Mr. Appleton said that he has a problem penalizing an applicant the trips for the undeveloped land. Mr. Persaud said that it is not a penalty. It is a right given to the owner of the undeveloped land. That land may not always be vacant. The negative figure in the calculations for this tract is because the petitioner is asking for 650 trips per acre which is way beyond what is allocated. Mr. Engelbrecht said that the intensity is not to penalize the first tract to develop. It is to protect the last tract so it will have some intensity left. The DDP calls this area low intensity and this case cuts into the low intensity. Mr. Appleton noted that if this case were moved one-half mile down the road it would not be in violation of the separation policy, yet it would look more attractive next to the strip center. 1 ri PS2 Minutes )DRAFT January 9, 1991 Page 15 somewhere rwhen i a that moderate rea ahas to be a ctivity center tabuts g a point low intensity area. otherwise it will keep encroaching into the low intensity area and changing it. Ms. Morgan stated that she is concerned about rezoning the property neighborhood service if for some reason the deal does not materialize or someone backed out. Then someone could come in and develop other land uses. Rebuttal: Mr. LeMond stated that he has provided a guarantee as best he can. It is based on faith in citizens by other citizens. The policy concerns all come from the pharmacy which will only be 1500 square feet out of 30,000. It is the tail wagging the dog. He said that he believes in the zoning process and recommended it to his clients. dynasic is not citizens. and a changing n do Things caring always Plans guidelines. follow e I Discussion and Decision: Mr. Glasscock asked what would be the next step if the Commission recommended denial. Mr. Kamman said that the applicant could come back with PD. a Mr. Robbins said that the applicant could request a hearing by the City council or could come back with a PD or could choose to withdraw the case. He said ti:zt the pharmacy is a retail use and that is why office zoning would be inappropriate. Neighborhood service is the least intense zoning that would allow retail and office uses. He agrees with Mr. LeMond about the tail wagging the dog. There is not a real impact on the infra-structure from this particular proposal but where does it end? The one-half mile policy is there but he agrees with Mr. LeMond that the are Soonersor later,btheeapplicants i mustghaveta dthe etailedpplan prepared. Lie building ~ the details and how long lits tacall kes is theainconvenienceeof doing the details up front for PD zoning. Ms. Morgan said that she is unsure that any of the uses allowed in neighborhood service would really be out of place at this location. +I 1 I 1 1 i I f l l P62 Minutes January 9, 1991 ~~~SSS Page 16 Mr. Glasscock said that he is not really worried about the other uses because the tract still belongs to the owner and will continue to until it is developed. Rayzor will not allow a development that he doesntt want. Mr. Morris reminded the commission that they are zoning lrud based on what would be the best use of the land, not based on who owns the land. Mr. Appleton said that the plans are fine except for the violation of a couple of policies. Common sense is needed. Mr. Robbins said that the policies exist as guides or criteria. n Mr Engelbrecht said that this development would put neighborhood service right behind general retail. That is a major violation of zoning policy. Neighborhood service was not designed to be used that way. He asked if there arm any other zoning classifications that would apply to this case. Mr. Robbins said no. t Mr. Appleton noted that this all hangs on 1500 square feet of pharmacy and that no one knows what could happen in a year. He moved to recommend approval of Z-90-015. Motion was seconded by Mr. Glasscock but failed (2-3). Mr. Engelbrecht, Ms. Morgan, and Mr. Kamman voted no. Mr. Kamman moved to recommend denial of Z-90-015. Motion L failed due to lack of second. VIII. Hold a public hearing and consider an ordinance amending Appendix e-Zoning of the Code of ordinances to allow one- family dwellings within specified non-residential districts. Staff Report: Mr. Persaud reported that the commission had discussed this issue in a previous work session. Prior to 1985 residential uses were allowed in non-residential zoning districts. In 1985 the ordinance was changed to prohibit resid.-.itial uses in non-residential districts other than Planned Developments and the central Business District. Since then there have been people desiring to live in the s prepared an ame building which is used for their business. Staff has dwellings in certain ordinance non-residential districts.y A one famil detached building will be required in light industrial districts. t 4 u } ATTACHMENT TO THE MINUTES STAFF REPORT To: Denton Planning and Zoning Commission Case No.: Z••+0-015 Meeting Date: January 9, 1991 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Robert H. LeMond, FAIR LeMond Associates Architects P. 0. Box 100366 Fort Worth, TX 76185 Current Owner: Newton Razor Requested Action: Rezone a 5.165 acre tract of land from Agricultural District to Neighborhood Service District. Location and Size: 5.165 acres located approximately 600 foot south of University Drive on the west side of Bonnie Brae. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - General Retail (Shopping Center) South - Agricultural (Mostly Vacant) East - SF-10 (Residential) West - Agricultural (Mostly Vacant) Denton Development Plan: Low Intensity Area SPECIAL INFORMATIO4 Transportation: Approximately 20 feet of additional right-of-way will be required along Bonnie Brae. Only one 1.1) curb cut will to allowed. Sidewalks will be required along Bonnie Brae. Utilities: There is an existing 16" waterline in Bonnie Brae. Sanitary sewer will need to be extended across Bonnie Brae frontage to Emery and tie into the existing manhole in Emory, approximately 130 feet east of Bonnie Brae. Adequate fire flow is available for up to commercial use. Ar- i f 4 4 (Case Z-90-015) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued) Drainage: The drainage system under Bonnie Brae was designed assuming residential development in this area which is consistent with the Denton Development Plan; therefore, an office or neighborhood service development of this size will require detention. The water inlets were sized and placed based on existing conditions; therefore, at least two-thirds of the site generated runoff needs to be collected on site before it reaches the street. HISTORY The requested rezoning is the first development activity'on this site. Therefore, there is no history to report. ANALYSIS i The property is located in a low intensity area. The proposed rezoning is for the purpose of constructing professional medical offices and possibly a pharmacy. Bonnie Brae is considered an entranceway into the City of Denton, According to the Denton Development Plan, development along major entranceways present the first impressions of the city to the public eye. The policy of this plan therefore is to encourage and promote good urban design to enhance the aesthetic quality and visual amenities along entranceways. There are specific guidelines in the DDP that are required for developments on entranceways. 1. Development proposals should be reviewed to ensure adequate compliance with standards and requirements including but not limited to the following. For each item, the neighborhood services district standard or other code standard for it is stated. a. Front Yard Setbacks: Minimum front yard setback in an Neighborhood Service District is 25 feet. b. Building Coverage: In Neighborhood Service District there is no maximum building coverage. r i (E-90-015) ` Page Three ANALYSIS (continued) c. Landscaping: 20 percent of the street yard will be required to be landscaped as well as 5 percent of any parking lot on a street, and 4 percent of any internal parking. d. Signage: One (1) ground sign will be permitted on the frontage of Bonnie Brae not to exceed 6 feet in height and 60 square feet of effective area. e, Curb Cuts: According to City engineers, only one (1) drive approach will be allotted off of Bonnie Brae. E. Off-Street Parking: For medical offices parking requirements are one (1) space for each two hundred fifty (250) square feet of floor area with a minimum of five (5) spaces. For a pharmacy, the required parking would be one (1) space for each two hundred (100) square feet of floor area with a minimum of five (5) spaces. . g, Design and Construction Facade: Tnts is an issue that generally is handled in a Planned Development District. In a conventional (straight) zoning district, it is difficult to address this issue. h. Pedestrian Access: When the property is platted, sidewalks will need to be designated. 1. Promote Integrated site design and layout which consider adjacent tracts of land with emphasis,given to internal circulation as opposed to continuous strip development, The City Council, by way of an unwritten policy, has requested that all rezonings on an entranceway come to them In the form of a Planned Development. The DIP policy for entranceways places a lot of emphasis on design issues, By rezoning this tract to a conventional (straight) zoning district, the governing bodies nor the public will have the opportunity to play a role in the design. A low intensity area is allocated 60 trips per acre. This particular tract is located in Study Area 114 which consist of approximately 300 acres. All of this study area is under one ownership and has been used for agricultural purposes as well as the homestead for the owner, the proposed neighborhood service developpment would be allocated 3,357 intensity trips (S.16S x 6S0 • 3,357). As per the Denton Development Plan, the total number of allocated trips for this site is 310 (5.165 x 60 ■ 310). Therefore, this site l 9 i , (Case Z-90-01s) Page Four ANALYSIS (continued) is ov°r allocated by 3,047 intensity trips. There are 1,498 unallocated trips in the study area. Because the proposed rezoning exceeds the allocated intensity trips, a disproportionate share analysis is required. In considering the disproportionate share allocation of intensity, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council should consider the following Items but are not limited to these Items: r- a. Adequate Infrastructure The Infrastructure in this area was designed to accommodate residential uses as well as low intensity type uses. There would need to be improvements to the existing infrastructure in order to accommodate this type of development. (See Special Information section of Staff Report). Generally, the infrastructure Is in place to support the development, or would be required during platting of the property to be adequately constructed . b. Unusual Topography There is no noticeable unusual topographic features to this site or within the study area which would provide intensity trips for allocation elsewhere. c. Compatibility One way to determine compatibility is through good design. The surrounding properties are mostly agriculturally used land however, the site abuts an existing strip shopping center which is located in a moderate activity center. d. Other Policies Strict compliance with the sign ordinance, landscape and screening ordinances will be required on this site, if approved. The proposal violates the trip allocation policy of the DDP and would cause the study area to be in an over-allocated status. 1 i u (Case Z-90-015) Page Five This proposal also violates both the concentration and separation policies of the DDP. The plan states that Neighborhood Service Centers shall be located at least a half mile from other non-residential retail centers. The size of the non-residential centers vary from 2 to 5 acres depending on their access to a specific category of thoroughfare. Bonnie Brae is considered a primary arterial with a ADP policy standard of three (3) acres of non-residential use. Because the requested rezoning is for a Neighborhood Service District, many types of retail type uses are allowed by right. The DDP addresses strip commercial uses as follows: I'g, Strip Commercial - It is the Intent of the plan to encourage centers of activities and to discourage strip commercial development. This will be accomplished by: 1) Limiting curb cuts. 2) Requiring site plan review (i.e., parking, setbacks, etc.) 3) Encouraging diversity on major arterials (commercial nodes broken up oy high density housing, offices, etc.) 4) Discouraging unsightly and hazardous strip commercial by requiring sign restrictions, buffering by greenbelts and/or landscaping. S) Limiting amounts of commercial/retail land use in moderate and low intensity areas." The proposed development adjoins and existing strip shopping center. If there could be a guarantee that medical offices and ancillary type uses were the only uses of this site, then there would be no violation of this policy of the DDP; however, with straight zoning there is no guarantee of the specific use. If the applicant chooses to reapply for a Planned Development District, there would be greater opportunity to reevaluate the proposed development especially relating to all of the policies of the DDP. For Instance, office use intensity trip allocation may not use more than the available unallocated trips of the that there to e prepare ahpD enough T Information t avhis ailable Indicated ' is study not area detailed plan. I ` 'e Owl 4 r (Case Z-90-01S) Page Six RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends dental of Z-90-01S. ALTERNATIVES f" 1. Approve petition 2. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. LUMIS Intensity Area No. 114 and Map it i 2Sllx 3 R DATE: 02/05/91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX B - ZONING OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO ALLOW ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS WITHIN SPECIFIED NON-RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval 16-0). SUMMARY: G: The current zoning ordinance prohibits residential uses in the non-resldential districts except for the Central Business District (CB) and the Planned Development District (PD). Planning staff have E` had requests over the past few years from citizens desirous of living in the same buildings where their businesses were located. A survey of cities in the metroplex revealed that it is general practice to allow the owner or an employee of a business to be able to live on or near the premises. The proposed ordinance (Attachment #11 will allow a one family dwelling to be located in a non-residential zone intended for use by the owner or an employee. The dwelling shall be attached to the non-residential building except that a detached dwelling is-permitted in a light industrial district. The ordinance, however, prohibits residential use in the { following specific cases: Electric substation, microwave towers, j water treatment plants, painting shops, service stations, tire 11 retreading shops, animal poun)s, livestock feed plants, poultry hatcheries and petroleum storage as collection facilities. I BACKGROUND: ordinance 85-156 adopted by City Council August 6, 1985, prohibited any residential use in the non-residential districts except for the Central Business District (CB) and the Planned Development District. That Ordinance provided a grandfather clause which essentially allowed existing non-resldential zones to be used for residential purposes until December 31, 1988. E PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFdECTED: N/A I r Amendment to Appendix B February 5, 1991 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable. Reapectf submitte : ~S Prepared by: Lloyd V Harrell City Manager Cil Harty N, ereaudo AICP Senior Planner ` Appr F H. Robbie , AICP Executive Direc or j Planning and Development Attachment: Draft ordinance 3939g I • I i f 1 I II Ji 1 1 rte' ,d ATTACHMENT 1 j ORDINANCE N0. - Ci . ONING ORDINANCE THE CODE S OF CITY or ORDINANCES TO ALLOW ONZ-FAMILY DWELLINGS WITHIN SPECIFIED NON-RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTSI PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF 52,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That article 12 of Appendix B-Zoning is amended by adding the following definitions (67) one-Family Dwelling, Restricted: A one family dwelling located on nonresidential property designed to be used by the owner or by an employee to be near the W nonresidential use. The dwelling shall be attached to the nonresidential building, except that a detached dwelling is permitted in a Light industrial district. This use is not permitted on property used for electric substations, microwave towers, water treatment plants, painting shops, service stations, tire retreading shops, or icolleaion poultry facilitiescher- animal pounds# o or petroleum storage feeding ieseFCTIOM ii. That paragraph 8 ("Primary Residential Uses") of of the Code the Schedule of Uses of amended by article adding the follo ing uses of ordinances is • a w a ej u a 1• TYP1 Y• S ~IIIrA~~ N~~1f~MT1A~ V866 e•t - tsictlastly D"11117,11 4FCTION iii. That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sun not exceeding a separate and provision distinct offense nonce is violated shall $2,000,00. Each constitute day that a 1 i ~.I ♦1. r NNNY~~~+R~ I 1 a~cTioN IY. That this ordinance shall becoand the City fourteen (14) days from the date Of its passa9s, secretary is hereby i directed to cause the Caption of this ordinance to published th twice of D nton TsxasC within t nc(10)tdays of the newspaper date of its passage. 1991. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of CC'.. BOB CASTLED Yo OR ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERSO CITY SECRETARY E BYt 1 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BYs J PAGE 2 1 . 1 ` [`r w... [HFRtt ATTACHMENT 2 PAZ Minutes January 9, 1991 DRAFT Page 9 Mr. Morris replied that the definitions are to define uses and not expand them. Adding uses is questionable if they were not included in the public notice. It does not appear that a recreation center was advertised, Mr. Robbins said that from reading the notice, he does not believe that people would have known other than a library was proposed. There is the same problem if the building is labeled "x". The issue is not the owner. He suggested approving the site plan with the library and then amending at a later date. { Ms. Brock withdrew her motion. Mr. Appleton asked who interprets the definitions of permitted uses. i Ms. Feshari said h does so. if there are questions, the matter would be brought to the Commission ' for classification of the use. Mr. Appleton moved to recommend approval of Z-90-016 as recommended by staff, Seconded by Mr. Glasscock and unanimously carried (6-0). Staff report for plat of site: Mr. Yost stated that the plat is for the same piece of land as the zoning case. The Development Review Committee recommends approval. It was moved by Ms. Morgan, seconded by Mr. Appleton, and unanimously carried (6-0) to recommend approval of the preliminary plat of the R.N.W. Addition, Block 1, hots A, B, and C. VIII. Hold a public hearing and consider an ordinance amending Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances to allow one- family dwellings within specified non-residential districts. Staff Reports Mr. Persaud reported that the Commission had discussed this issue in a provious work session. Prior to 1985 residential uses were allowed in non-residential zoning districts. in 1985 the ordinance was changed to prohibit residential uses in non-residential districts other than Planned Developments and the Central Business District. Since then there have been people desiring to live in the same building which is used for their business. Staff has pwerepared an in certain ordinance non-residential districtss.~ A one famil detached building will be required in light industrial districts. J 2-1 r r II 1 PH Minutes LJ "'RAFT January 9, 1991 1LJJ Page 10 i I Ms. Brock asked if the ordinance is clear that only one family would be allowed. Mr. Persaud said yes. Only one family will be permitted, allowing either the owner or an employee to live at the place of business. Mr. Appleton asked how the ordinance will be monitored. Mr. Persaud said that the usual code enforcement methods would be used. Staff is recommending approval of the ! ordinance. G.` Mr. Glasscock asked if the detached houses would be I permitted. ) i Mr. Persaud said no unless the zoning is light industry. Otherwise, the family would have to live in the same s building as the business. Ms. Brock pointed out that the ordinance says the owner may live in the same building. It does not say there is a requirement to do so. Mr. Robbins said she was correct, there is an option. There could be detached dwellings. Ms. Morgan said that there have been problems with people living in railroad cars. She asked if this ordinance would affect them. Mr. Persaud replied that those people would have to have an arrangement with the railroad. This ordinance only permits an owner or employee to live at the place of business. Mr. Robbins noted that in April 1989 there was a suggestion at the city Council level that the cumulative zoning ordinance did away with people living in businesses along Elm street or in funeral homes. Other communities allow that. The Council directed that staff prepare the type of ordinance being presented tonight. The Zoning Task Force has recommended it as well. Decisions Ms. Brock moved to recommend approval of the ordinance. Motion was seconded by Mr. Appleton. Mr. Glasscock said that he is in favor of the ordinance if it will help out overall. 2-2 i I y _ r.. t i t t ~ 1 P&Z Minutes f~ [l January 9, 1991 page 11 Motion carried (6-0). IX. Sold a public hearing and consider amending Article the Code Planned Development (PD), of pp of ordinances. Staff Report: Mr. Robbins reviewed the proposed ordinance with the s n recommendat n was~to Mr. Robbins s prsaid that the ocedures for original two procedures will be too confusing. b Those procedures that have been streamlined into one. The Commission discussed d11, uring Planned discussionDevelopments aboutitlargetitract May amending 23, Article development. The idea was such that detailed building footprints would not be required in the first step of the PD process. In many cases, requiring building footprint and like data of such fine detail was not necessary during the first step of the PD process. The Zoning Task Force took testimony from some of our largest landowners, and from local developers familiar with PD's. Staff briefed the commission about the Task Force's discussion on November 26, 1990. During these discussion, it was thought that the existing PD system would be left in place and the three step process would be added; that there would be two separate types of PD's. After further staff consultation, it was felt that leaving the existing system 'in place would leave unnecessary procedures and regulatory language in place, but instead, simply have one type of PD system, but allow the developer, P&Z, or Council to have the Detailed Plan (with footprints) approved by ordinance where very fine details were necessary to insure appropriate compatibility and impact mitigation. Mr. Robbins summarized the amendment of Article 11 as follows: 1. A three step process with three district plans. a. General Concept. Includes showing broad land use categories on a map, a table of less broadly defined uses, and development standards for each use. A site analysis would be required. The General Concept Plan would be idopted by ordinance. b. Development Plan. A more detailed list of uses would be shown on a plan or map. Last step in zoning, able to be combined with General concept plan, approved by ordinance. 2-3 - r DATES 01/25/91 L~~ C, I CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TOs Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMI Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT RECOMMENDATIONS i Planning and Zoning Commission and the Zoning Ordinance Task Force recommend approval, f SUMMARYs 1. A three step process with three district plans. as General Concept. Includes showing broad land use categories t on a map$ a table of less broadly defined uses$ and development standards for each use. A site analysis of existing land use and environmental characteristics would be required. The General Concept Plan would be adopted by ordinance, after recommendation from Planning and Zoning. j b. Development Plan. A more detailed list of uses would be shown on a plan or map. Able to be combined with General Concept Plan. Approved by ordinance. f c. Detailed Plan. No change from existing informational requirements, detailed site plan required. Approvable by Planning and Zoning. Appeal by developer to Council if denied. No public hearings or notice, unless Council approves when Step 1 and 2 are shipped, i 2. steps 1, 2P or 3 could be combined. 3. Additional information at any step may be required or provided. I 1. Conditions may be added at any step. 5. Broad criteria for approval by Planning and Zoning of the detailed plan are listed. I 6. There would be no development schedule. The detailed plan's approval would be valid for twenty-four months, with Planning and Zoning extension up to one year. 74 Fee Schedule ' c Request approval of detailed plans $1,000,00 plus $50.00 per acre or part thereof, to a maximum of $6,000.00. -f 4 t 0 tmcd..~ 3 Mayor and Members of the City Council January 25, 1991 Page 2 Request approval of a general concept or development plan: 5500.000 plus $25,00 per acre, or part thereof, to a maximum of $3,000.00, minor amendment of a detailed plan or extension of timer $175.00 8. See Attachment 10 Planned Development comparison of the existing PD system and the (=o) Summery for a proposed system, f BACKGROUND: The Council's development process goals committee established an J~ action item to streamline the PD process in their 199D work plan, At j the Planning and Zoning meeting of May 23, 1990, during a discussion about large tract development, amending Article 11, PDs, such that detailed building footprints would not be required in the first step of the PO process was discussed, There was a consensus then, the provision of that very detailed information yea that rs to advance of actual construction was very problematicr that many PD's are often amended several times because of minor site plan amendments and that in many cases, requiring building footprint and like data of such fine detail was not necessary during the first steps of the PD process. The newly appointed Zoning Ordinance Task Force considered amending Article 11 in November, 1990. They took testimony from some of our largest landowners, and from local developers familiar with PD's, Staff briefed the Planning and Zoning Commission about the Task Force's discussions on November 280 1990. There was a Planning and Zoning Commission consensus to proceed at that time. On Decemuer 61 19900 the Task Force recommended adoption of an ordinance allowing three steps not requiring "footprints" in the first two steps, and eliminating the development schedule. The task force also recommended that there be no minimum development size that could be reviewed with the three step process, I During these November and December discussions, it was thought that the existing 4 left In : rocess would be system P j that would bea twos se arate h! a step ? PD's. After further staff consultation, it was felt that lea i,gsthe existing system in place would leave regulatory language in place# but instead,simpcl shay pne ty[e6 and system, but allow the developer, Planning and Zoning, or Councilf to have the Detailed Plan (with footprints) approved by ordinance where very fine details were necessary to inaure appropriate compatibility and impact mitigation. I i r, 'PW t ` Mayor and Members of the City Council January 25, 1991 page 3 on January 9, 19910 the Planning and zoning commission reviewed a draft ordinance and recommended it to you. The City Council held a work session and discussed the new zoning system on January 22, 1991. There was a consensus to proceed and to eliminate the public hearing and notice provisions from the last step, The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing and again considered the system on January 23, 1991. They too voted to eliminate the public hearing and notice provisions from the step that allows the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve the detailed plan. i PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED. a Development review staff and developers, t i r FISCAL IMPACTt None. Respectfully su ed: Appr ved: Lloyd V Harrell City Manager err/ tl, ank H. Ro bins AICp Executive Director Planning and Development ti wp I e { Attachments, 1. Summary Comparison j 2. Planning and zoning Minutes, November 28, 1990 3. Planning and Zoning Minutes January 9, 1991 1 , 4, Planning and Zoning Minutes January 23, 1991 2979k I I' I i ; !1 r y / 4Z ] i ' 1415 iltFJ. i " ATTACHMENT 1 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY EXISTING SYSTEM I PROPOSED SYSTEM 1. Concert Plan 1. General Concept Plan (for tracts greater than 10 acres in size) a. Existing conditions of site a. Statement of Intent ( b. Proposed land uses b. Relation to Comprehensive J c. Development Standards Plan J (i.e. Night, setback, c. Acreage i FAR ) d. Land uses I *Considered by Planning and s e. Off site information Zoning Commission and City f. Traffic and Transportation I Council. g. Buildings (location, I Two Public hearings, one height, setback) i 200 foot notice. h. Residential Subdivision I C:, (location of lots, minimum 2. Develo ment Plan size, width and depth, yard ay a Combined with a requirement) General Concept Plan. t. Water and Drainage jj. Utilities a. Specific land use k. Trees locations on a map, 1. Open Space b. Detailed table of m. Screening permitted uses. n. Development Schedule *Considered by Planning and 7 *Heard by Planning and Zoning Zoning Commission and City Commission and City Council. Council. Public Hearings, 200 foot Two public hearings, one notice. 200 foot notice. 2, Detailed Plan I 3, Detailed Plan a, All information required a. Some as current regula- 1 for Concept Plan except tions, except that pre- exacts, not approximations.` liminary plat would be b. Detailed Landscaped Plan I processed separately. c. Signs - location, type, b. Criteria for approval. and size visible from any c. Approval expires in 24 public street. months. d. Sidewalks or other pedestrian paths *May be approved by Planning e, All information required and Zoning Commission only for preliminary plats. if development plan is f. Development Schedule approved. No public hearing or 200 foot notice. Appeal May be heard by Planning and by applicant of P42 denial. and Zoning Commission only if concept plan is approved. Notes: There would be no ( detailed site plan with "foot- Tracts less than 10 acres ( prints" approved in steps 1 and must submit detailed plan. 2. No development schedule. No limit on size. Any steps may be combined. 2S42x i a t P&Z Minutes November 280 1990 Page 17 The commission examined the old boundaries and the proposed new boundaries of the planning area. B. Discuss an amendment to the Denton Development Plan by expanding the boundaries of the Special Purpose Activity Center. Mr. Seese explained that the Denton Development Plan (DDP) adopted in September 1988, designated the Municipal Airport Area as a Special Purpose Activity Center. The center encompasses a gross area of approximately 4,533 acres of which 1,077 acres or 23.76% is floodplain. Staff is proposing to add approximately 2,784 acres to the Special Purpose Activity Center. In, delineating the boundaries of the Special Purpose Activity Center, staff reviewed the criteria established by the Appendix A Task Force, with regards to physical and environmental features, location and shape of tract, and land use compatibility. Ms. Brock said that even though there were no limits on intensity in the Activity Center, she still wants a clear picture of proposed developments. The commission examined the proposed boundaries. r C. Discuss amending Article II "Planned Development District" of Appendix B-Zoning Ordinance. Ms. Feshari stated that under the current planned development (PD) ordinance, an applicant goes through a two step process involving a concept plan and a detailed plan. The current requirements for the conceptual phase of a PD are extremely detailed in character. Staff is discussing with the Zoning Task Force adding a new type of PD which may have up to three steps. Building footprints would not be required during the rezoning processi how6ver, they would be required in the Detailed Plan. This is being proposed in order to better achieve the theory of a Concept Plan to be conceptual by nature. There is a provision in the current ordinance in which all sites less than ten (10) acres in size shall submit a detailed plan. The concept plan would be y completely bypassed. In addition, the detailed plan would substitute for the preliminary plat. This must be heard by both the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. All proposed developments larger than ten (10) acres may initially submit a concept plan before submitting a detailed plan. The concept plan must be heard by both the Planning and Zoning Commission and City 'r IZ P&z Minutes November 28, 1990 Page 18 Council. If the detailed plan does not substitute for a preliminary plat, then the detailed plan need only be approved by the Planning anc zoning Commission. The three step process would be an option for the applicant. It would give the applicant more flexibility because they often do not know the exact business that will develop on their property at the time of zoning. Development schedules would be submitted at the detailed plan stage. Ms. Feshari reviewed with the commission the exact steps of both the old and proposed new processes. Me. Brock asked if there is currently any pressure on the city to use a speedier process. Mr. Robbins said yes. The three step process will be a useful tool for any large acre developer. Rewriting Article 11 can be done faster than the rewrite of the entire zoning ordinance. Mr. Engelbrecht noted that the subject was discussed at the last zoning Task Farce meeting. Some developers will be coming to meet and discuss the proposal at the next meeting. Ms. Feshari said that the three step process will allow more flexibility. It does not tie developers into exact I building footprints which they may not know at the j concept plan stage. Mr. Engelbrecht said that he thought it would be helpful to look at a PD case and see what was done nd what could have been done using the three step process. sk Force was also concerned about the 10 acre cut-off. { re a lot of requirements for small property owners. VII. Directorts Report Mr. Robbins gave a summary of what the Platting Committee has been working on. He reported that the zoning Task Force has been focusing on the proposed amendment to Article 11. He said that they are a good group of people that will tell you what they think. He also noted that the of their members~tosthe Drainage to consider appointing one Task Force. Meeting adjourned at 10:15 p.m. i t ~ avurr~ urv:. xr • pb2 Minutes D ❑ F T January 91 1941 Page 18 Motion carried (6-0). - 1 Articl e 110 ! 'g, Sold a public hearing and consider of App ndix Be Zoning of the Code 4 planned Development (PD), of ordinances. Staff Reportt Mr. Robbins reviewed the proposed ordinance with the Commission. Mr. Robbins said that the original recommendation was to have it two procedures has been decidedr that ntwo developments. Since then, Those procedures have C. procedures will be too confusing. The Commission discussed meeting o been streamlined into one. amending Article 11, Planned De about velopments at litsarge tract May 230 1990, during a discussion development. The idea was iredcin thetfirtastop ofu the PD footprints would not be requ building footprint and process. in many cases, recNfiring the like data ofofs~hg fine rocesis. w Theo Zonings Task Force gtook first step and from testimony from some of our largest landowners, familiar wit PD's. Staff briefed th Task Force's discussion on November 28g local developers ommission about the c 10. During these discussion, it was thought that the exi49sting PD system would be left in place and the three step process would be addedf that there would be two separate staff would leave consult types P Athe rexisting sy stem in placetion, felt that leaving unnecessary procedures and regulatory language in place, but but allow the instead, simply have one type of pD system, with developer, P&Z, or Council to have the Detailed plan (wit footprints) approved by ordinance where very fine deta and were necessary to insure appropriate compatibility impact mitigation. Mr. Robbins summarized the amendment of Article 11 as follows: 1. A three step process with three district plans. use a • General Concept. a table sof hlessg broadlybroad defined categories on a map, uses, and development ir analysis would be ror ed. The General Concept Plan required. would be adopted by b. Development Plan. A more detailed lin zoning, ist of uses would to be on lan or be scombineda with General cjAst oncept p p ane approved by ordinance. 1 ~I ~4 r r .KMwe. I ` I P&Z Minutes DRAFT January 9, 1991 Page 19 c. Detailed Plan. No change from existing informational requirements. Approvable by P&2. Appeal by developer to Council in case of denial. 200 foot notice given and public hearing before consideration. STAFF NOTES The commission may wish to consider adding a neighborhood appeal to council, if landowners of 20% of the land adjacent to the detailed plan protest. 2. The district could not be finally created without a development plan's approval. 3. Steps 1 and 2 would be combined by submitting a development plan. 4. Additional information at any step may be required. I 5. Conditions may be added at any step. i 6. Broad criteria for approval by PH of the detailed plan are listed. 7. pThere lan's wappro al would be valid fore 24 months, withiP&Z extension up to one year. S. Again, this amendment would replace the existing Article 11. The application of the amendment would still apply to PD's approved before May 20, 1906. 9. Fee Schedule Request approval of detailed plans $1t 00 Ope 0 sore 1 or part thereof, to a maximum of $6,000.00 Request approval of a general concept or development plans $500.00, plus $25.00 per acre, or part i thereof, to a maximum of $6,000.00. Minor amendment of a detailed plan or extension of times 1 J t t Y P62 Minutes DORAFT January 9, 1991 Page 20 Ms. Brock asked if the amendment will apply to PDs done prior to 1986. Mr. Robbins said that it will apply to some of them. Ms. Brock clarified that all four conditions must be true, not some of the them. Mr. Robbins said that there needs to be an appeal process. The Commission will not know many details when they see the general land use plan. Mr. Appleton noted that the ordinance says the commission may approve the detail plan. He asked if that means they don't have to or if it should read that the Commission "shall" approve the detailed plan. Mr. Morris said that the Commission will have final authority to approve detailed plans. They will have to follow the criteria. The commission can choose to delete the criteria and let the Council have the final authority, or the wording could be reversed to say that the Commission f may disapprove the detailed plan if it finds . . . The intent is to project what the Commission will be looking for. Mr. Engelbrecht asked about substantial compliance. Mr. Morris replied that it does leave some discretion. For example if a street should be 30 feet wide and it is 290 would that be substantial compliance? Mr. Robbins said that the term "substantial compliance" makes the difference between the old PD ordinance and the proposed new one very minimal. Jesse Coffey, 3513 Grenada Trail, asked if the new process will apply to PDs zoned before May 20, 19860 and in fact to all PDs. Mr. Robbins said yes. Mr. Coffey asked if approved PDs will have to come back to the City to get the same zoning. Mr. Robbins said that if their site plans do not have all 1 the information required in the new ordinance they would have to come back. P&Z Januaryu9, 1991 DRAFT Page 21 Mr. Coffey said that he just wants to make sure that anyone that has a PD or is proposing a new PD will have to meet the same requirements. Mr. Robbins said that everybody can use the new process. Each PD is different and some of the old PDs have more detail than others. Mr. Coffey tried to clarify that the new ordinance would not benefit one group. He asked if old PDs will have to start over. Mr. Robbins replied that they might have to submit and pay fees if they do not have enough detail. Some of them will have it others won't. if they don't have all the information, then they would at least have to get a detailed plan approved. Staff would have to look at the existing PD and see what stage of the three step process the old PD is at. Less information will be required to get approval at the City Council level. Mr. Coffey said that to be fair, the City should let all the old PDs come up to new requirements for free within a given period of time. Mr. Robbins explained that the new ordinance is less restrictive than the one that was approved in 1986. Mr. Appleton said that it seems wrong to charge everyone $1000 regardless of what they are doing. Mr. Robbins said that the city cannot have a sliding scale J fee. The line has to be drawn somewhere. Mr. Appleton said that he thinks Mr. Coffey's suggestion is a good idea. Mr. Robbins said that it would be a problem to contact all the PD owners. Mr. Morris commented that the city is not changing what was required in 1986 and the 1986 ordinance applied to all prior PDs. Mr. Coffey noted that he has had a difficult and lengthy time getting zoning. Everyone should be treated and charged the same. j VF- AV r e ~ rf ~ DRAFT r P&Z Minutes January 9, 1991 Page 22 Ron White of the Perot Group, 12377 Merit Drive be algood stated that conceptually the amendment appears to idea that benefits all parties and landowners laand thelprsizes, it takes a length of time to develop gives flexibility. It is hard to have footprints of r buildings up front. He favors the amendment. Ms. Brock closed the public hearing. She moved to add an amendment to the ordinance that if0/ the % fthe,landowners then City within 200 feet of a zoning protest Council approval should be required. Mr. Engelbrecht asked her to define protest. Ms. Brock defined it as a written petition. Mr. xamman seconded the motion. Mr. Appleton asked if the approval would automatically go to the council. h Mr. Robbins said that the commission would acv a by recommendation to the council which would app majority vote. Motion carried (6-0). Ms. Brock clarified that the petitioner can choose to use ! one, two, or three steps to do a PD. The first two steps could be merged in the third and Council action would be required. if the Council approves stage 2, then the P&Z choose the could approve stage S3. Letting the he is concerned about doing away with process is a virtue. have not reall the development scheduoYk b work-ad anyway. it may better to have®devslopmant begin within thin 24 months once the detailed plan is approved. If the detail in plaC8la shepsaidthat the new process should be available place.. to everyone ood improvement. She moved to is a g the nn missiono osed ordinance wit . Seconded by , J recommend approval the the commission. proposed amendment made and i by with th Engelbrecht and unanimously carried (6-0). Mr X, Work Session - Discuss federal storm water run off rules and regulations. The commission postponed the discussion. y MINUTES DRAFT Planning and Zoning Commission January 13, 1991 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas, was held on Wednesday, January 23, 1991, at ' 5:00 p.m. In the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 215 East McKinney. Present: Roy Appleton, Eultne Brock, Ivan Glasscock, Judd Holt, William Kamman, and Fran Morgan Absent: Jim Engelbrecht Present from Staff: Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning and Development; Karen Feshari, Urban Planner; Owen Yost, Urban Planner; Cecile Carson, Administrative Analyst; Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney; and Olivia Carson, Secretary Chair called the meeting to order. I. Minutes It was moved by Mr. Holt, seconded by Mr. Glasscock, and unanimously carried (5-0) to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of December 12, 1990. 1-V- Hold a public hearing and consider amending Article 11, Planned Development, Appendix B of the Code of Ordinances. 1 Mr. Robbins stated that since the last discu-7sion of r f amending Article 11, a discussion has ensued concerning the requirement for public hearing, notice to property owners, and the 1120% appeal" for PL's which have already been through review of general concept and development plan ; review. Such review entailing up to two 200' notices and our public hearings. There is the potential of 6 public earing and 3 notices, The question is if we need all that. The existing system is that a project over 10 acres can have a conce t plan, under 10 acres begins with the detailed plan. If a concept plan is approved, then PbZ can i approve a detailed plan. There Is not a lot of difference between what is required on the concept and detailed plan. The proposed amendment concerns the amount of detail on the concept plan. The 1 new process will have 3 steps. The general concept plan will have broad categories. 'Ihe next step is the development plan and then the detailed plan. The steps can be combined. He explained what would be required at each step. Additional conditions could be added at each step The proposal would eliminate detailed footprints from the first two steps. There would be no development schedule. Staff is suggesting that even if there is a 201 protest at the detailed plan stage after City Council approval of a development plan, then P$Z approval It c 4 IA , t P&Z JanuaMirynut1e3, s 1991 DRAFT Ja Page 2 only should be required for the detailed plan. He reviewed ' criteria for approval that the Commission could use in its decisions. If there is no construction within 24 months after would ezpireal He reviewed tthenproposedhfeeeschedulelwithnly the Commission. Mr. Robbins continued that Council seems to fill easy with the three step process. They also felt comfortable with no public hearings or notice at the last step. That needs more legal research. ` Mr. Morris said that he would be looking closer at the r idea. The way he looks at PDs is that it is a process. The adjacent landowner is not aware of building footprints until the final stage, The State enabling act talks about zoning, not PDs. The public hearings give people a chance to communicate about the effect of a development. The Supreme CA- Court says the site plan is the essence of the PD. That is when people know where things are going to be. That is the reason for PD zoning. The difference in a PD vs. straight zoning is that you can see exactly what the development will look like. At the detailed plan stage, the developer presents evidence that the plan should be approved. The criteria. IleusaidathatpheoistnotpsureethatethenCity cant allow the petitioner to speak but not landowners. If you j don't have a public hearing then you will not get public, comment, That may be what is desired. Ron White, 12377 Merit Drive, Dallas, 75251, said that he is r ` not an attorney. He does not intend to discuss legal issues. He will be presenting concerns about the last stumbling block in the process. When this amendment process was initiated, they were after 1) flexibility to create zoning and enhance marketing ability because they didn't know who they might sell to, 2) recognition of the city's C concern for land use control and, 3) creation of an ordinance that does not put Denton in a competitive disadvantage with other cities. There concern is with step 3 and having a public hearing at that stage. When they are selling sites, the buyers want to know all the rules up front. If steps 1 and 2 are done separately, there will be 4 public hearings. There is sufficient and adequate time for interested persons to express their concern at those hearings. At step 3, the contracts are signed, financing is ' aligned, and the buyers have gone to a lot of trouble. To have negative input would be unfair after all that expense l+, and the other opportunities that were given for input. These important things should be addressed at step 2. Once j step 2 is accomplished and decided, step 3 is an administrative compliance with thejre inguproceps.wheret is not unlike the straight zoning p compliance is ensured for set codes, It is unrealistic Ji j 1 E ya. r r rnr~ • 4 ' PAZ Minutes January 23, 1991 DRAFT Page 3 to have a public hearing at step 3. It is unrealistic to think that Denton could be competitiv . Even without the public hearing, the staff and Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) would still get to review the detailed plan. Mr. Holt asked if intensity would be determined at the concept plan stage in the same manner as straight zoning. Mr. Robbins said yes. Mr. Holt asked if a petitioner would go ahead with a detailed plan if a disproportionate share is needed. Mr. Robbins said yes. A site plan can be required at any step. Mr. White reviewed a chart of the process with the Commission. He showed them examples of how the new process would work. Mr. Robbins said that the detailed plan information requirements will be the same as today. People are going to come in earlier to get zoning now because the will not have to give so much detail up front at the concept plan stage. People will know what their neighboring zoning will be earlier. All large landowners are in favor of this process. This will make zoning more predictable and and issues can be addressed at earlier stages. Ms. Brock clarified that the issue at hand is whether the Commission should retract its recommendation for public hearings at the third stage. I Mr. Robbins said yes. It the Commission and Council are j comfortable with that idea, then this might could be called f4 something besides a PD to get around the legal requirements. Mr. Morris said that there is often tension between the developers and the city. Most litigation comes down to the detailed plan stage. That is when adjacent landowners know where the parking tot, lighting, and building will be. Pep Boys argued that their detailed plan should be approved j because it was a permitted use. In straight zoning uses are E permitted by right. In a PD, you can say that use is a function of the design. A particular use may be acceptable on one corner of a retail tract but not on another. If a development has the vested right to go in, then there is t nothing for the City to decide. The use is permitted in essence in a PD until the final plan stage. That is when questions are answered. 4 ~ k P&Z Minutes January 23, 1991 Page 4 DRAFT Don Dillard said that the developers want quality too. In most cities of the Metroplex there is a similar PD process as described by Mr. White. Users are sophisticated in what they rant. They want the rules on the tale so they know what they will have to do. J Ms. Morgan asked if there is a final public hearing in other 1111 cities. Mr. Dillard stated that in Richardson they went through a series of hearings on land use. They got the uses but had , to agree to buffers and setbacks. There was still t no use. Heisaidtthat asdatdeveloperohe wouldnlike totgete concerns of quality worked out in stage 2. Mr. Holt said that he is concerned about tying the hands of the city in the future. Mr. Dillard said that the city has the opportunity to building in safeguards. They are not asking for blank checks. Mr. Appleton asked if they were more concerned with the 2001 1 notice or just public comment. Mr. White said that the concern is that once a development is so far down the road the funnel needs to start closing I down. It is difficult to get people to take a risk. They are not concerned about comment, they ire concerned about public hearings where groups can organize over the years and suddenly at the fourth public hearing provide influence over l what has already been determined as an allowable use. r' a Mr. Appleton said that it is fair to get three shots at a PD l S ; because it changes three times. There are three different plans. Mr. Morris said that the developers are wanting assurance at i stage 2. If the Commission can turn down a plan at stage 3, E then there is no assurance at stage 2. There is no assurance until the detailed plan is approved. If there is j rf no notice at stage 3, then the adjacent property owner will f not even know about discussions of traffic circulation, layout, etc. Mr. Robbins stated that other metroplex cities do not have i public hearings at the point in question. They have a two step process but do not have public hearings at the detailed plan step. The Commission can still look at the detailed plan and appprove it or not. The applicant could appeal denial to tAe Council. 1 1 WF p&Z Minutes January 23, 1991 DRAFT Page 5 the neighbors could appeals Mr. Appleton asked if Mt.. Robbins said nos -Ity has set Mr. White stated that In strat ht zonings the c it has determined will,work for that zoning rules that d general retail lot category. If,you take a site zone ~d by complying examples a bu Idi ng permit could be obtaine rd with the applicable rules for general retail. The thl ocess is the same. There is a stage In the proposed PD pr d ups. system of checks and balances but no hot Mr. Holt commented that with Pep Boys the original design e eighborhood. if the Commission saw a had bays facing th n reject itT design like that with the proposals could they Mr. White said that lie thought so. The project planner needs to work with staff to catch those types of lglkborhood caseldthe ne incoa atablitties. In the Pep BOYS I have recognized was tKere first, and their designer shou that. the Commission can Mr. Holt said that the point is t that re is a public heating. disapprove a Ian whether or no the p that he does not see any horror in Mr Appleton stated op;ning up for neighborhood comment. Sometimes the Commissi be swayed by a zealous petitioners on can Mike Reynolds stated that Denton is SO tough from a competitive view that businesses stay aWHY- lie has had great idifficulty attractinj buyers for his property because of the excessively strict and use regulations He did a of property that has traded hands to investors and survey There has not banks between January 1989 and December 1990 been only one investor and he 1:,pre Sen t at the ;eeting. Denton has a bad reputation. U rs look at several sites a City that I!; working With them, they and when they see at city, The City has an will lean towards the site in ti inate some development obstacles with the opportunity to elim proposed amendment. MS, Brock acknowledged Mr. Reynolds expertise in the area, but stated that she has observed tar e corporations joing to restrictive places like Plano which ~as lots of regulation, Mr. Reynolds said that he does not think they have a third stage in those places, Think how much Penny's spent on their -site layout. They did not hove to have additional public hearings at tilo final Stages ~ b ~ nabyu215 1991 Pa DRAFT ge Ms. Brock pointed out that the new PD process is at the suggestion of large land owners. Mr. Reynolds stated that they did not suggest three sets of public hearings. Three years ago he zoned a tract at Mayhill and I-35, lie did not set up any development standards and in retrospect, wishes that he had. When he brings in a user, there will have to be more public hearings. The user views this as having no zoning at all and looks at the site negatively. They would not be able to just go in and develop single family homes without having a public hearing. Mr. Holt clarified that the concern is zoning restrictions, not landscaping or sign regulations. Mr. Reynolds said yes. Mr. White stated that he is democracy oriented but there comes a time when someone has to make a decision. In the ` real world that is a problem. If you leave the process with three sets of public hearings, the marketing ability will drop on their pproperty and getting a user becomes an uphill battle. That is not what happened with Penny's or Exxon. The Commission needs to look at that closely. Mr. Holt said that the only difference would be a public hearing format, The Commission could still turn down a plan. OnlYAP ublic input would be eliminated. He asked what ! is done in ustin. Mr. White said that his company zoned 300 acres there. They had to set aside green space in step I and were limited to percentages of land use. They will have to to back to the city for road layout, infrastructure, etc,, but will not need another public hearing. He suggested that places that require additional public hearings do not have dynamic development, They sold a multiple use zoning tract in Atlanta to a Japanese company and no public hearing was { required at the last step. They had to get approval as to where the hospital would be but after that the hospital worked with regulatory authorities to develop the final fans. There need to be a good reason for re ection at step Vans. working through the process, rejections should be very seldom at that stage. if the process is not worked through, then there is a risk but step 3 should not be a major deal killer. Only minor details should be worked out at that point, Mr. Kawman asked if landscaping and sign regulations were a bother. 1 i _I 1 t, y Januaryu23, 1991 Page7 DRAFT Mr. White said no as long as they know them up front. Tne zoning process is the area of most concern. Mr. Holt said that the problem is twat people say businesses run away from the sign and landscaping regulations. Where do they go? Other cities are more ,restrictive than Denton. You are saying the problem is with the zoning process. Mr. White said that this amendment sets them up to have to deal with the city. If the other requirements are too restrictive, they will ask for a variance at step 1. Mr. Holt said that it has been stated that the city is at a disadvantage because of restriction and he just wanted to clarify that only zoning restrictions were being referred to. C Mr. White said that they will look at the other restrictions later. Their concern now is with the zoning process. Ms. Brock moved to recommend that there be no public hearing or notices sent out at the detailed plan stage. Motion was seconded by Ms. Morgan. j Mr. Appleton stated that he does not want to make Denton less competitive but he has a problem not with not letting the public speak, It sends out a bad message and precedent. It says that the city cannot be persuaded and it removed what is already being done, Mr. Glasscock said that there are still some hearings. This would just one less. The Commission is appointed to represent the community and members get input every day. Motion carried (5-1). Mr. Appleton voted no. 2S441x 6 f E r 1 9 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM T0: Honorable Mayor and Members of the city council FROM, Joe D. Morris, Assistant City Attorney SUBJECT: Revised Planned Development Ordinance ~i DATE: February 1, 1991 Tho revised Planned Development ordinance delegates to the Planning and Zoning Commission final authority to approve detailed plans where the Council has approved a general concept and development plan. In those cases, the ordinance deletes the requirement that the Commission give notice to property owners and hold a public ! hearii.q on the detailed plan. Although other cities also apparent- I ly follow this procedure, there is a question whether this procedure conflicts with state law. Chapter 211 of the Local Government, the state zoning enabling law, sets forth procedures to be followed in creating and amending zon- ing districts and regulations. The law provides for the creation of a planning and zoning commission to make recommendations to the city council on zoning matters. (6 211.007 (a)). The commission is required to notify adjacent property owners and hold public hear- ings on requests for district "changes in classification", (5211. 007 (c)), After receiving the report of the commission, the City council may change a zoning district or adopt amended regulations after giving notice by publication and holding a public hearing. (6211.006 (a)). state law contemplates the adoption of Euclidian zoning districts, where each type of district has uniform regulations governing the height of buildings, setbacks from streets, etc,, as established in the comprehensive zoning ordinance. All properties placed within a retail district, for example, have the same regulations, i Planned development districts are not mentioned in the state law authorizing zoning by cities, although they are widely used in Texas. Most cities' comprehensive zoning ordinances authorize the creation of PD districts in one form or another, Planned develop- ment (PD) districts are intended to provide relief from the rigid- ity of Euclidian zoning districts. They usually allow for a variety of land uses and sometimes contain restrictions on their use, such an size. The general idea behind PD districts is that by dispensing with fixed regulations, the developer has greater flexi- 1 ~ t. t= Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council February 1, 1991 Page 2 bility in the design of the buildings, streets and open spaces, and other development featuresrthat lot., s will produce a development superior to what could be done in otpar zoning districts. Unlike other zoning districts, PD districtshave her no set "regulations" The "regulations" are ewhich auto ' tablished in-thelpp apply process o and the usually district. are ct, different for each PD district, Under our current PD ordinance, the Commission is delegated the authority to give final approval to a detailed plan with the concept plan previously approved by t City it Council complies The concept plan in the current ordinance is a he general " shows the approximate location of buildings# sttsaite~~ is and other development features, as they will a plan that The second Ste r parking lots, The same step, the dotalled iplan, shows thepexa t location not atures Sion need only determine that°thegdetailedailan plan, the Commis- concept plan, it cannot a plan complies with the r ings, parking lots or other de el pmentefeaturer ocation of build- The new ordinance considerably alters that procedure, two steps of the proposed ordinance "general The first development" plan) do not regu ro (the concept" and schematic general drawings or site plans showing the location or layout of buildings, minor streets, open spaces, etc, instead, general district re p what applies in other zoning districts, wills beo est blishodls to the final step, the detailed site plan showing the layout ollthe development foeture~ri~ing to be or submitted and reviewed and approved or disapproved b Sion, Y the Commis. in reviewing the detailed plan, the Commission will obviously be performing to ooze degree a function previousl city Council. Questions of traffic circulation performed b arrangement of buildinggs the location , the location end spaces, and the other issuesthatnormally walls, in the site plan disapprovedeby the Commission based onethe criteriaaas tab the ordinance, approved or 1lahed in It could be argued that approval of the detailed plan is part of a three stage "zoning" process for the PD districts because it estab- lishes the final "regulationso, for back, height and other regulations tare destablished~AinhPreceding set- steps, the location of buildings, parking lots, open space, etc, Preceding 1 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City council February l, 2991 Fags 7 are fixed bt he ~ comply with the detailed plan and the developer approved plan.) is required to In the one Y case considered b the validity of grounds) PD districts the Texas supreme Court , t he court stated that (later withdrawn addressing IF rezoning+'ara inseparable functioin a ns b causi the ordirOi nC site Plan ing for the pD an and site plans sut) mittedand der functions directl Self. 11 is therefore from speolfic buildinovid- Teer meaning, g and 12 664 S,W,2d 702 ess in and of it. N App' 2d 222, holdin (1984) (see r qualities as delineated on he location of structures + 26 rise and indispensable attributeeral site °turea and Other site of the dplan "constitutes mate- tender this argument the detailed lstrtct itself,++), for the district plan is ~ detailed and therefore the city part of the regulations because theaestabllfollow the shmant annotice and hearing council should review functions and hearing proceduressOf State ~ this is the better which cannot be Of zoning regulations are in litigation, position to take itdthisAted, b~camlieve that BOYS' case. It was basically the City+s argument I. the The other the pep aids the argument is that the commis Plan a quasi-judicial n Y plan for the district, nro sion is merely ad by the Council and the Commis lunatisionlon m~r when el !t ppvas the detailed blood on the have already been APprov-*lines so Plan complies with those re t forth in they ordinance, Whether th $e assumes that the otlbuildinand guidelines h hsrgu th on the site plan are not location are g and other features argument I ing of State law, even though themselves within the shown approved site plan in develop the developer is bound Although to mean- ping the district, follow the procedures we have not performed en as 1 fferent PD ordinances Y comprehensive surve A planner with Plano told m• that most of the prs the y+ there are is already diready zoned pp and the end as there are cities, loge to approve a detailed p an 0 not sines quire noticoe and public hea - there Is r ing, Richardson also doss not require notice and hearin detailed plan stn a change„ in zoh- dstricts and had „ although they did say g at the McClendon, Director none on the ground++ y they ptime. few e said Worth requires notice and pea ing for Fort Worth is time' Bruce Fort Was of the opinion that most metroplxh cif es disite d lik Alwen isest stage and , pp~ Wk1 4 1p r Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council February IF 1991 Page 4 This is one of those issues where there is room to argue whether and cil approval of the detailed plan State law always requires Coun + held, Of course, the an more notices be oach, given legally hearing would be to have council that no ®gally speaking, notice and conservative appr the regular approve the detailed plan and following it the Council decides hearing procedures for rezoning. However, en to 6: to do adopt the ordinance as Prop foresee and someone does happen the procedure, the only major cons reQtsiring the City to conthatt a court may invalidate the procedure, reprocess some Zoning cases. ?"."Orris JDMslah x01 Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager Planning _a..uki&p, Executive Director of and Community Development APPROVEDs Debra A. Drayovitah P01.69 w W"" rjq~ t 1 13 r r erlloiebrwry t, 1991 f ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING ARTICLE 11 OF APPENDIX B-ZONING OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES RELATING TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS; AMENDING THE TYPE OF PLANS REQUIRED AND THE INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR EACH} AMENDING THE APPROVAL PROCESS; AMENDING THE PROVISIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULES; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN TOE HAXIMUM AMOUNT OF 52,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. SECTION I. That article 11 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of ordinances is amended to read as follows: Article 11. Planned development districts. A. General Provisions: 1. Purcose. The purpose of this article is to provide for the creation of Planned Development zoning districts, These districts are intended to rovide for the deve- lopment of land as an integral unit for single or mixed use in accordance with a plan that may vary from the established regulations of other zoning districts. They are also meant to encourage flexible and creative planning to ensure the compatibility of-land uses, to allow for the adjustment of changing demands to most the current needs of the community, and to provide for a development that is superior to what could be accom- plished in other zoning districts by meeting one or more of the following purposes: (a) Provides for a design of lots or building; in- creased recreation, common or open space for private or public use; berms, greenbelts, trees, shrubs or other landscaping features; parking areas, street design or access; or other develop- ment plans, amenities or features that would be of special benefit to the property users or communi- ty; I (b) Protects or preserves topographical features, such as trees, creeks, ponds, floodplains, slopes or hills; or j (c) Protects or preserves existing historical build- ings, structures, features or places. J 1 y r r )S 1 FV,yiia i `l E 2. Definitions. commission shall mean the Planning and Zoning Com- mission. Department shall mean the Department of Planning and Community Development. PD or District shall mean a planned development zoning district. plan shall mean a general concept plan, development plan or detailed plan. 1. Wnlig xsion to Existing Undeveloped Districts. The provisions of this article requiring the submission and approval of a detailed plan prior to development of the District shall apply to any District for which devel- opment has not begun and for which no detailed plan has been approved which substantially complies with the requirements of this article. 4. Notice, Hearing and Wri&ten Protests._ The provisions of Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code relating to notices, public hearings, and written protests for changes in zoning districts or regulations shall apply to requests for approval or amendment of general concept plans, development plans and detailed plans, except detailed plans over which the commission has final approval authority. B. Approval of Districts and Plans. is Dist ict Plans. There are three types of plans that may be used in the planned development process. The general purpose and use of each plan is described as followss !a) ~enaral Concept Plan. This plan is intsndea to be used as the first step in the planned development process for larger or long term developments. It establishes the most general guidelines for the District by identifying the land use types, ap- proximate thoroughfare locations and project boundaries and illustrates the integration of these elements into a master plan for the whole District. (b) pevelopmsnt__Rla This plan is intended to be used most often as the second step of the PD process. The development plan contains all the information of a general concept plan, but in- PAGE 2 J w r Wr .,pow t. E i cludes more detailed information uses and their boundaries as to the specif- ic netailed Plan. The detailed plan is the final (c) of the planned development process. it con- tains the details of development for the property. For smaller tracts or where final development plans are otherwise known nosed prior to rez nthe,diae to establish detailed plan may b step in the planned trict and be the only required development process. 2. snnra~°~ of District. The City Council may, after C'. receiving the report of the Commission, approve by ordinance the cr de eion of a lo went, districe based detailed plan upon The general concept, P approved plan shall be made pact of the ordinance ame establishing the developmentnpl an nmust dmentbes in harmony concept plan with the plan for the entire district and must be approved by the City council by ordinance. If a District is appro- 3. n jtg! o[ D ve ooment_31e11• nplanmby ve upon a genera ol nce a development ordina approve by ordinance ordinance for all or part of the District, a copy of ~ which shall attached to erequestsc approvals of ha District. it t the applicant for which no development detailed plan for property plan has been approved, the detailed plan must be approved by the City Council. 4. of Detailod__pJAM. The commission o Aooro al a detailed plan is delegated the authoritytoapprove for or the amendment of a detailed plan for pro d bper the City which a development planproveshall be attached Council. The The a appprov the ordinance rove establishing detailed District, plan i! ite Con mission find; mission shall app thatt (a) The plan complies with the general concept plan or development plan approved for that propertyi (b) The plan provides for a compatible arrangement of i propertiesrout- s and land uses and affectnadjoini 9 neighborhoods would side the plant (o) The plan provides for the adequate and sale circu- lation of vehicular traffics and PAGE 3 I c (d) The plan is in substantial subdivision and other regulations landscape, sign, of the City, or, if not, the plan offers corre- sponding benefits that merit deviation from those regulations. 5. Conditions Imposed. The Department may recommend and rr the Commission or City council may impose conditions concerning the location, use, arrangement, construction or development of the District in order to ensure the appropriate use of the District and to protect sur- rounding properties.. 6. Expiration of Detailed Pian. Any detailed plan approv- ed after February 50 1991, shall be valid for twenty- four (24) months from the date of its approval. If no construction begins pursuant to a building permit issued for the property within the 24 months, the detailed plan shall automatically x r dnolonger be valid. The Commission may, prior expiration the detailed plan, for good cause shown, extend for up to 360 days the time for which the detailed plan is valid. ' 9. Anneals o Commission Action. If the Commission disapproves a detailed plan over which it has final approval authority, or imposes conditions, or refuses to grant an extension of time for which a detailed plan is valid, the applicant may appeal the decision to the City Council by filing a written request with the Department within ten (10) days of the decision. C. apF1~~Ations and Submi@@i9n@i lp ica*ion Fee and Plan Reauirssi. Any person requssting rezoning to a planned development district, or the amendment of a District plan, shall submit an application, the fee and the required plan and informa- tion m which the plans, petitioner studies, wishes maps, o a other informa be J considered by the Commission or Council must be submit- ted to the Department at least two weeks prior to the public hearing on the request. Should the petitioner submit additional information after that time, the Com- to allow the council mission Department time t may defer additional consideration information. 2, Form nd Manner. To properly process applications and administer this article, the Department is authorized to specify the form and manner in which all required information and plans are to be submitted. Requests for amendments to part of a District must take into account the approved plan for the whole District. The i PAGE 4 I r , i may, rtc.e~ I applicant may be required to show the remainder of a District not included in the petition in order to determine whether the amendment would be in harmony with the plan for the entire District. 3. Additional information Required or Waived. The Depart- ment, Commission, or Council may require the submission of additional plans, statements, or other information not specified in this article if necessary to properly evaluate the petition. The Department may also waive any required information it finds it unnecessary for proper consideration of the petition. 4. General ConceRt plan information. A general concept plan shall contain the following informational (a) Relation to the Master Plan. A general statement setting forth how the proposed District will relate to the Cityts comprehensive plan and the degree to which it is or is not consistent with that plan. (b) Acreage. The total acreage within the proposed District. (c) Survey. An accurate survey of the boundaries of the District. (d) Land Uses. Proposed general land uses and the acreage for each use, including open space. For residential development, the total number of units and the number of units per acre. (e) Deneral Thoroughlare l.ayg . Proposed streets, as a minimum to arterial street level. (Showing col- lector and local streets is optional.) (f) Develo2ent Standards. Development standard for each proposed land use, as followst 1 (1) Minimum lot area. (2) Minimum lot width and depth. (3) Minimum front, side, and rear yard areas. (4) Maximum height of buildings. (5) Maximum building coverage. (6) Maximum floor to area ratios for nonresi- dential uses. (7) Minimum parking standards for each general land use. (g) Existing Conditions. On a scaled map as specified by the Department, the following shall be shown PACE 5 a Mr 1 ILn pN ■ for the area within and adjacent to the proposed District: (1) Topographic contours of ten (10) feet or less. (2) Existing streets. (3) Existing 100 year floodplain, floodway and major drainage ways. (4) City limits and E.T.J. boundaries.: (5) Zoning districts. (6) Land use. (7) Utilities, including water, wastewater, and electric lines. j 5. Development Plan Information. The development plan shall contain all the information required for a general concept plan, plus the following: (a) Permitted Uses. A table listing the specific permitted uses proposed for the property to the detail specified by the Department. (b) Boundaries. A map showing the boundaries of the different land uses and the boundary dimensions. 6. Detailed Plan Information. The detailed plan shall contain the following informations (a) Acreage. The acreage in the plan as shown by a survey, certified by a registered surveyor. (b) Land Uses. Permitted uses, specified in detail as determined by the Department, and the acreage for each use. (c) off-Site Information. Adjacent or surrounding land uses, zoning, streets, drainage facilities and other existing or proposed off-site improve- ments, as specified by the Department, sufficient to demonstrate the relationship and compatibility { of the District to the surrounding properties, uses, and facilities. 1 (d) Traffic and Transportation. The location and size of all streets, alleys, parking lots and parking spaces, loading areas or other areas to be used for vehicular traffic; the proposed access and connection to existing or proposed streets adjacent to the Districts and the traffic generated by the proposed uses. PAGE 6 1 W - : +t; r. e i (e) Buildings. The location, maximum height, and minimum setbacks for all buildings, and if nonresidential, the maximum total floor area. (f) Residential Development. The number, location, and dimensions of the lots, the minimum setbacks, the number of dwelling units, and number of units per acre. (density). (g) water and Drainage. The location of all creeks, ponds, lakes, floodplains or other water retention or major dreinage facilities and improvements. (h) Utilities. The location and route of all major sewer, water, or electrical lines and facilities necessary to serve the District. (i) Trees and Landscaping. The location of all pro- tected trees and a landscape plan as required by the City's landscape ordinance. (j) open Space. The approximate location and size of r greenbelt, open, common, or recreation areas, the proposed use of such areas, and whether they are to be used for public or private use. (k) Screening. The location, type, and size of all fences, berms, or screening features proposed be- tween different land uses or adjacent properties. (1) Signs. Location, type, and size of all signs regulated by the City's sign ordinance. (m) Sidewalks and bike oaths. Sidewalks or other improved ways for pedestrian or bicycle use. o the PD District: D. Development 1. Compliance with Approved Plan. No development shall begin and no building permit shall be issued for any land within a District until a detailed plan has been approved for that land. All Districts shall be deve- loped, used and maintained in compliance with the approved detailed plan for the District. All other plans, maps, drawings, pictures, written statements or other representations on which the city council or com- mission relies in approving a detailed plan shall be considered part of the approved detailed plan and shall be incorporated in the ordinance and be binding upon the property. 2. LgrmilIted Uses. The permitted uses for a District shall be specified in the approved detailed plan. No person PAGE 7 r; .uraara~ ya. r ~ lM M iy I' shall have the right to make use of any property within a District for any permitted use except upon approval of the detailed plan showing the location and layout of the permitted use. 3. Corrections of Errorg Omissions on Detailed Plan, Upon the request of an applicant, the chairperson of the Development Review Committee may authorize minor tech- nical changes or adjustments in the approved detailed plan to correct errors or omissions, so long as such changes do not substantially change the use, character, or design of the development. 4. Regulations Applied, Omissions, All conditions, regula- tions, and development standards for the district shall be contained in the ordinance or approved detailed plan for the district. If any regulation or restriction applied in other zoning districts by Appendix B-Zoning is omitted in the approved ordinance or detailed plan, r the regulation applicable in the most comparable zoning district, as determined by the Department, shall apply to the property. Any person aggrieved by the Depart- ment's decision may appeal the determination to the City Council after recommendation by the Commission. SECTION 11. That the fees applicable to planned developments are amended as follows: Request for approval of detailed plan: $1,000.00 plus $ 50.00 per acre, or part thereof, to a maximum of $6,000.00 Request for approval of a general concept or development Plan: $ 500.00, plus $ 25.00 per acre, or part thereof, to a maximum of $30000.00 Request for minor amendment of a detailed plan or extension of time: $ 175.00 SECTION M. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby declares it would have enactP! such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. PAGE 8 v R SECTION IV. That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $2,000.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen days (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official news- paper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ day of , 1991. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY r/lny~ BY., I J PAGE 9 , J r } 1 „ ral n• i DATE. 02/05/91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Or TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CONCEPT MAP OP THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO PROVIDE FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE SPECIAL PURPOSE ACTIVITY CENTER AND AMENDING THE BOUNDARIES OF INTENSITY AREAS 1, 9, 10, 95, 105, 107, 109, 110 and 111 of APPENDIX A RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and zoning Commission recommends approval (6-0). SUMMARY: The 1-35W corridor is attracting greater prominence. A large site on the west aide of I-35W was considered for the Matsushita project last year. The Texas Enterprise zone also includes large tracts of land along the I-35W corridor. It is proposed to extend the Special Purpose Activity Center to include a site south of Hickory creek between Highway 377 and I-35W. The area west of the 1-35W is t characterized by large flood plains and large tracts under one ownership. The inclusion of these tracts into designated intensity areas is essential to Implement the policies of the Denton Development Plan. It is proposed to delineate intensity area 1110 i and amend the boundaries of intensity areas all, 9, 10, 107, 109 and 111. (See attached staff report and maps.) BACKGROUND: Since the Denton Development Plan was formulated and adopted In 19880 the Alliance Airport Development has accelerated the development potential of lands along the I-35W corridor. The I i proposed expansion of the Special Purpose Activity Center will facilitate the zoning and marketing of the site. e proposed J amendments to the intensity area boundaries will Thpromote the j pla"iing and development of lands in that area In accordance with the policies in the Denton Development Plan, PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS Ok GROUPS APFECTED: N/A 1 I 1 1 City Council Report January 22, 1991 Page 2 L FISCAL IMPACT: i N/A Respectful submitted: u 1~ Prepared by: Lloyd Harrell City Manager Harry Per ud, AICP Senior Planner ~ APpr V --I rank H. Robbi , AICP Executive Director Planning and Development 32169 r I r ' i i f a I 1 CITY of DENTONs T1XAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM i DATE: January 16, 1991 TO: Denton City Council FROM: Harry N. Persaud, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: AMENDING THE CONCEPT MAP OF THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO PROVIDE FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE SPECIAL PURPOSE ACTIVITY CENTER AND (I AMENDING THE BOUNDARIES OF INTENSITY AREAS 1, 9, 10, 95, 105, 107, 1 109, 110 AND Ill OF APPENDIX A. The Denton Development Plan adopted in September 1988 designated the Municipal Airport Area as a Special Purpose Activity Center. The Special Purpose Activity Center is intended primarily to encourage and promote the establishment of an industrial economic base to serve as the hub for employment and economic activity in the future. The current boundaries of the center are shown on map Attachment il. The center encompasses a gross area of 4,533 acres of which 1,077 acres or 23.761 is in the flood plain. Since the Denton Development Plan was formulated and adopted, the Alliance Airport development has come into prominence and the I-35W Corridor in southwest Denton has become a prime site likely to attract a large corporate i { relocation or a major mixed use project. The site east of the I-35W and mouth j of FM 2449 had been considered early last year by Matsushita, a Japanese electronic company. j j In June 1990, the Texas Department of Commerce approved two vaterprise zones for Denton under the Texas Enterprise Zone Act. The boundaries of Zone I extend south along the I-35W to include a large site between 1-35W and 2449 See Attachment /2I. The owners of these Hwy. 977 in the vicinity of FM tracts have petitioned the City for annexation of approximately 11397 acres at this location with the objective of establishing zoning on the tracts. With Enterprise Zone designation and given the strategic location of this site in the I-35W Corridor, it is the expectation of the City and the land owners that a major economic development project may be attracted to locate here. In order to establish the appropriate zoning classification and aggressively 8111566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 1 h # . 1 Denton City Council January 16, 1991 Page 2 market the site, staff is now proposing to add approximately 2,744 acres to the Special Purpose Activity Center. Approximately 709 acres or 25.46% of this area is in the flood plain. In delineating the boundaries of the Special Purpose Activity Center, staff reviewed the criteria established by the Appendix A Task Force, with regards to physical features, location and shape of tract and land use compatibility. The proposed boundaries shown on map Attachment 13 are as follows: North - Hickory Creeks East - The Railroad and Hwy. 3771 South - Crawford Roads West - I-35W. C, The proposed expansion of the Special Purpose Activity Center will absorb low intensity areas #101, #102, #103, and part of moderate activity center #95 and #105. The Western portion of the Denton Planning Area is characterized by large flood plains and large tracts under one ownership. Some of the large land owners have approached the Planning staff to discuss the future planning and development of their tracts. The Perot Group (TPG) and the Henry S, Miller Trust have submitted a general concept plans and are currently pursuing annexation and zoi,ing of 1,367 acres east of I-35W. The New Market Group Southwest Inc. has met with staff about a large tract west of the TPG property north of Crawford Road. EMS Realty has been pursuing a General Development Plan for a 912 acre tract located in the southeast corner of Highway 156 and US Highway 380. The inclusion of these tracts into designated intensity areas is essential in order to implement the policies of the Denton Development Plan. R Staff is now proposing to extend the western boundaries of the Denton Planning Area as shown on map Attachment #4. The expanded planning area will make it possible to delineate low intensity area #110 to include the area north of Crawford Road and east of Florence Roadj and to amend the boundaries for low intensity areas 11, #91 #10, #1070 11091 and #111. intensity calculations for these areas have been set up in LUMIS files (Attachment 151 as part of Appendix A. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered these amendments to the Denton Development Plan and voted 6-0 to recommend approval. Harry N. rsaud 1 wp Attachments: 1. Current boundaries of the Special Purpose Activity Center 2, Amended Special Purpose Activity Center 3. Map showing current intensity area boundaries 4, Map showing amended intensity area boundaries 5. LUMIS files 6. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission meeting 12/12/90, 7. Resolution 39359 S r ATTACHMENT 5 LAND USE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF DENTON Intensity area is 1 Types Loy Intensity trips/Ac - - 60 Traffic survey zones 6693 Boundary Descriptions Norths AT i SF Rail Road Dates 11/15/90 Eastse 1 35er Road Neste AT G SF Rail Road LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS CATEGORY UNITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY ACRES UNITS INTENSIT SF-16 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SF-30>16 9 3.25 90 0 0 0 0 0 SF-7>10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LESS SF-7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MOB.HOMES 5 0.75 50 0 0 0 0 0 DUPLEX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q MF-R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MP-192 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON/RET 0 2.5 1625 0 0 0 0 0 OFFICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q INDUSTRY 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSTI NAL 0 0 0 0 0 PARKS .0 0 0 0 0 R/O/SPACE 0 0 0 97.36 0 0 0 0 TRANSPORT 0 175.6 0 0 0 0 0 AGRIC. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VACANT(*) 0 2094.7 0 1997.34 Q 0 0 0 TOTAL 14 2280.6 1765 2094.7 0 0 0 0 ............................................r............... .......p INTENSITY CALCULATIONS (2) Intensity existing land uses (built) tiles 60 131765 (3) Trips allocated to current zoning incl. P On (not built) 0 (4) Trips allocated to vacant lands not zoned plus Agric. zoning 119840 (5) Estimated unallocated intensity trips (1)■ nus(2)+(3)+(4 15243 (6) Percentage of intensity trips allocated 89 Notes Vacant land under current zoning represent areas outside the city limits with no zoning 5-1 ~I 1K 't LAND USE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF DENTON • •..a....--aaa.. Intensity area #s 9 Type: - LOW Intensity trips/Ac 60 Traffic survey z0nes: 6696A Boundary Descriptions SNorthi outh: Tj line for the City of Krum HWY 360 Dater 11/15/90 East: Egan Road and Radecke Road West: FM 156 -------------------•----a--•--a-•------------------- LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS . CATEGORY UNITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY ACRES UNITS INTENSIT --O-------o--------- 0 0 0 0 SF-16 < 13 13 130 0 0 0 0 0 0 SF-10>16 0 0 0 0 0 0 SF-7>10 0 0 0 0 0 0 LESS SF-7 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 MOB.80MES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DUPLEX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MF-R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MF-162 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r COM/RET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OFFICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSTITNAL 0 2.5 212.5 0 0 0 0 0 PARKS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R/0/SPACE 0 293.45 0 0 0 0 TRANSPORT 0 61.16 0 0 0 0 0 0 AGRIC. 0 22.45 0 654 0 0 0 0 VACANT(*) 0 654 ......................................................0 . ....TOTAL 13 1046.59 343 654 0 .....a.r ............................a...r.r..r INTENSITY CALCULATIONS (1) intensity area total trips 1046.58 times 60 62795 (2) Trips allocated to existing zoland ninquinoi~bPiDs)(not built) 0 (3) Trips allocated to current 1 A ics z+(3)+(4 29212 (4) Trips allocated to vacant lands not toned plus A io zoning 39240 (5) Estimated unallocated intensity trips ( ) (6) Percentage of intensity trips allocated ---------------•---------a-•-•-•-.-.r ..r_ a•--• resent areas outside Notas Vacant land under current zoning rep the city limits with no zoning 5-2 . M~. s A j.. V. ts,.vi t i. ~ LAND USE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF DENTON ° --r. Intensity trips/ac 60 intensity area #1 10 Typal i'Ov Traffic survey z0ne61 6696 66979 Boundary Description: Souuth$ Jackson Road Dates 09/20/89 Easts Lovers Lane C1.4 West: Dry Fork .................r.........................r...r..._r-----..___.r._--•---------• •.r LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS CATEGORY UNITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY ACRES UNITS INTENSIT _._.r-•-----... 0 0 0 SF-16 < 68 59.54 830 0 0 0 0 SF-10>16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SF-7>10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LESS 3F-7 0 0 p 0 0 MOB.HOMES 21 4.5 2100 0 0 0 0 0 y DUPLEX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 MP-R 0 0 HT-1&2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COM/R OFFICBET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FFIC INDUST:iI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSTIINAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I R/O%9PAC8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRANSPORT 0 31.64 0 17.20 0 0 0 0 AGRIC. 0 0 0 0 VACANT 0 1074.09 O 834.76 r.r__._.r.rrr_r___.r...r_r.r O O O TOTAL 104 1182.91 1040 1074.09 A ..r..r..........r ' INTENSITY CALCULATIONS r_r..r ................r 1 (1) Intensity area total trips 1182.91 tiles 60 71040 (2) Trips allocated to existing land use 0 (3) Trips allocated to current toning incl. P Ds (not built) 63413 (4) Tripps allocated to vacant lands not zoned plus Agrici.z+(3j+(4) 3413 6521 (5) Estisated unallocated intensity trips ii 91 (6) Percentage of intensity trips allocated ..............rr.............. 5-3 w E LAND USE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF DENTON s_ Moderate intensity-area 01 95 Typo Intensity trips/Ac 350 Traffic survey zones: 6727 Appendix A Boundary Description: Noor h: Rater to guidelines in sth: Date: 12/04/90 East: Nest: - LAND - USE EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING pLANNED DEVELOPMENTS CATEGORY UNITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY ACRES UNITS INTENSIT SF-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SF-10>16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SF-7>10 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LESS SF-7 0 0 0 0' 0 MOB.HOt1ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 DUPLEX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HF-R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MF-162 0 0 0 17.28 0 11232 COM/RET 0 0 0 0 0 OFFICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INDUSTRY 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 INSTIINAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 PARRS 0 00 0 7.8 0 0 0 0 R/0/SPACE 0 0 0 0 TRANSPORT 0 0 0 11.46 0 0 0 0 AGRIC. 0 7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 44.04 0 7.5 0 0 VACANT ------------°---------------°-----------------------------------`-----0 ►°_11232 TOTAL 0 51.54 0 26.76 0 17.28 INTENSITY CALCULATIONS (1) Intensity area total trips 51.54 times 350 180390 (2) Trips allocated to existing land uses (built} 11232 (3) Trips allocated to currant zoning inal. P Dr (not built) 2625 (4) Trips allocated to vacant lands not zoned plus AAqgria. zoning z (5) Estimated unallocated into trips (1)minus(2)+(3)+(4 4182 (6) percentage of intensity trips allocated ONE THIRD RULE CALCULATIONS Aorta Trips 0 11167 (1) Allocations for com\ retail development 170,19 (2) Existing com\retail land was (built) 11232 (3) Current zoning for com\retail land uses 17,28 11232 (4) Total allocated (2) + (3) -0.10 -65 (5) Unallocated trips/acres 1 f 1 LAND USE MANAGEMENT pMT DEPART SYENT PLAN.4ING AND Dr"LOMENN CITY OF DENTO ....r...--... 350 -Intensity trips/AO Types Moderate Inten area #s 105 sity zones' 6115 ReLer to guidelines in Appendix A Tra!!l0 survey zones' Norths Boundary Souths 12/04/90 East= Dates Wests . - . p D DEVELOPMENTS CURRENT ZONING UNITS INTENSIT r.........._rrr_.r_r USE ACRES LAND USE EXISTING INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY CATEGORY tTtilT9r-M_rr- b 0 0 0 b 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 SF-16 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 SF-10>16 0 0 0 0 sr 7>10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I LESS SF-7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MOS.HOMES 0 0 0 0 0 0 DUPLEX 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 MF-R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MF-li2 0 0 COX/RET 0 0 0 p 0 0 4 0 OFFICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INDUSTRY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSTI'NAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R/O/SPACE 0 0 0 11.47 0 0 0 0 TRANSPORT 0 b 8.25 0 0 0 0 11.75 0 AGRIC. VACANT 0 . . 0 0 0 0 31-47 31.47 0 31.47 TOTAL --'....-W-... - INTENSITY CALCULATIONS 11015 31.47 . uses 350 b (1) Intensity area total trips land uses (built) 0 land P Ds (not built) 7000 (2) Trips alloca ted to existing in to current zoning Aqrio. zoning (3) Trips allocated 4015 to vacant lands not toned Plus ( (i) nus(2)+(3)+(4 64 4} Tripa allocated in Estimated unallocated trip* ta trips llocated ((55) ) Percentage of intensity ..a CALCULATIONS ONE THIRD R Trips _._r------............ Acres 6819 10.49 0 (1) Allocations for com\ retail development 0.00 0 • (2) Existing cos\retaii land ail landluies 00..00 0 00 r cas\ 10.49 6819 (3) Currant zoning !o ( 3} ...r........••..._ (4) Total allocated (2 r_r_ (5} Uneilocsted trips/acraM ...._._..rr_.r r.....r..r._.rrr...r.wr. LAND USE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM PLANNING.AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY Or DENTON .........................►►._..._........rr_...............-►--............. Intensity area t: 107 Type: Low Intensity trips/Ac 60 Traffic survey zones: 6702 Boundary Description: Sort: Christal and lbouRoad ndaries for Mod. area 0108 Date: 11/15/90 East: Hickory Creek West: C. Wolfe Rd. LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS CATEGORY UNITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY ACRES UNITS INTENSIT ► ........................r........-................................r...........-- SF-16 < 13 13 130 0 0 0 0 0 SF-10>16 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 Sr-7>10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'r 0' LESS SF-7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 MOB,HOMES 5 2.5 50 0 0 0 0 0 DUPLEX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MF-R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MF-112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + COM/RET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 OFFICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i INDUSTRY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 INSTI'NAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PARKS 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R/0/SPACE 0 670.42 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRANSPORT 0 44o75 0 68.72 0 0 O 0 AGRIC. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 VACANT(*) 0 1454.34 0 1385,62 0 0 0 0 .................►..............r......► TOTAL 18 2185.01 180 1454,34 0 0 0 0 a INTENSITY CALCULATIONS ..r...wr 1 101 (i) Intensity area total trips 2185.01 times 60 131180 (2) Trips allocated to axist nq land usos (built) (3) Trips allocated to currant zoning incl. P Ds (not built) 0 (4) Trips allocated to vacant lands not zoned plus AA qvrie. toning 83137 (5) Estimated unallocated intensity trips (i)minus(2)+(3)+(4 47783 (6) Percentage of intensity trips allocated 64 ..--r.-......rr .............r........r...-.r.r..r..rrrrr...rr....r..rw..-....... (;)Nets: Vacant land under Currant toning represents vacant land outside city limits 5-6 i s w LAND USE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF DENTON Intensity area 1: 109 Type: Lov Intensity trips/ac 60 Traffic survey zones: 6714A 6703A Boundary Descriptions North: Jim Christal South: Lively Road Dates 11/15/90 East: C. Molts Road Weett FM 156 and the ETJ line of the City of Ponds ....r..w-......rr ......................r....................r...........r..-r.r.. LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS CATEGORY UNITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY ACRES UNITS INTENSIT .....................................................................:......w SF-16 < 16 16 160 0 O 0 0 0 SF-10>16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SF-7510 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LESS SF-7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MOB.HOMES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DUPLEX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MF-R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MY-162 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COM/RET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OFFICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INDUSTRY 0 1 103 0 0 0 0 0 INSTIONAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PARKS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R/0/SPACE 0 831.43 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRANSPORT 0 47.54 0 68 0 0 0 0 AGRIC. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VACANT(*) 0 3693.71 0 3695.21 0 0 0 0 w............w ..................r...................-......................w TOTAL ..........16- 4590-1...... 265..3693-21 O O 0 0 ...r....r........r....wewr.....w .....r INTENSITY CALCULATIONS .....................r. (1) Intensity area total trips 4590018 times 60 2754161 (2) Trips allocated to existing land use (3) Trips allocated to current zoning incl. P Ds (not built) 0 (1 Trips allocated to vacant lands not sorted plus Agric. zoning 217513 (3) Estimated unallocated intensity trips 1)m nus(2)+(3)+(4) 57633 (6) Percentage of intensity trips allocated 79 . ........r.....r ..............r...............wr.....r....r.......... ity lands under current zoning represents vacant areas (*)Hotel Vacant limits. outside the 5-7 1 h r' 1 J )s 1 k LAND USE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF DENTON . .............................................r.....•-----........... Intensity area 1: 110 Types Low Intensity trips/Ac 60 Traffic survey zones: 6715 Boundary Description: Northt FM 2449 and Lively Road Southt Crawford Road Date: 11/15/90 Eastt 1135 W West: Florence Road ----r LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS CATEGORY UNITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY ACRES UNITS INTENSIT ..............r............................................r.... SF-16 < 19 19 190 0 0 0 0 0 SF-10>16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SF-7>10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LESS SF-7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MOS.ROMES 47 32.5 470 0 0 0 0 0 DUPLEX 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 MF-R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MF-1i2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON/RET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OFFICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INDUSTRY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSTI'NAL 0 1 85 0 0 0 0 0 PAW 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 9/0/SPACE 0 903.85 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRANSPORT 0 104.96 0 0 0 0 O 0 AGRIC. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VACANT(f) 0 5875.56 0 5875.56 0 0 0 0 ...................................................................r TOTAL 66 6936.87 745 5875.56 O 0 0 0 -r.......................... ................w. ...r....... INTENSITY CALCULATIONS (1) Intensity area total trips 6936.67 times 60 416212 (2) Trips allocated to existing land uses (built) 743 (3) Trips allocated to current zoning incl. P Ds (not built) 0 (4) Trips allocated to vacant lands not zoned plus Agric. zoning 352634 (5) Estimated unallocated intensity trips •(.1)minus (2)+(3)+(4; 62934 (6) Percentage of intensity trips allocated 85 r.r..r.....r►r.........r.rr..... .................r............rr..r............. Note: Vacant land under current zoning represent areas outside the city limits with no zoning 5-8 1 r r LAND USE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF DENTON Intensity area 9: 111 : Low Intensity trips/Ac 60 Traffic survey zoness 6701 _ Boundary Description: Souuth: Jim Chri380 stal Road Datet 11/15/99 East: Egan Road Waste FM 154 LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS CATEGORY UNITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY ACRES UNITS IHTENSIT SF-16 < 2 2 20 0 0 0 0 0 SF-10>16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SF-7>10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LESS 97-7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- - 0 MOB.HOMES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DUPLEX 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 MF-R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MF-162 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COM/RET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OFFICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INDUSTRY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSTI'NAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PARKS 0 R/0/SPACE .0 148.52 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRANSPORT 0 61.18 0 0 0 0 0 0 I O 0 AGRIC. 0 0 0 637.75 0 0 VACANTO 0 737.06 0 99.31 0 0 0 O -•.--.-•..r......••• . 20 737.06 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 2 948...76 INTENSITY CALCULATIONS (1) Intensity area total trips • •948.76 time 60 56926 e (2) Trips allocated to existing land uses (built) 200 (3) Trips allocated to current zoning incl. P Ds (not built) (4) Trips allocated to vacant lands not zoned plus Agrio. zoning 44224 (5) Estimated unallocated intensity trips (1)2nus(2)+(3)+(4 12682 (6) Percentage of intensity trips allocated 78 Note: Vacant land under current zoning represent areas outside the city limits with no zoning 5-9 I a 3 i ATTACHMENT 6 "'AFT P62 Minutes, December 12, 1990 Page 3 Recommendationt Ms. Feshari stated that staff recommends approval with the condition that signs be in conformance with Article 17, B-zoning. Ms. Brock asked about the 301 logo sign. Ms. Feshari said that it is in conformance with the sign ordinance. The site has a drainage easement fronting on Loop 288 where 300 signs are allowed. Mr. Kamman stated that he is also concerned about a traffic problem being created by cars entering off of Colorado. Ms. Feshari said that staff has worked on the design with the developer. Mr. Clark said that the ingress is 8o' from Loop 288.. Traffic coming from Loop 288 is generally moving slow because of the rise on Loop 288. They should not have to slow down much more to enter Arby's. Their drive is intended to be a high speed access. They are trying to avoid signalizing the Target entrance on Colorado. Mr. Engelbrecht asked what the city will have to do if there is an internal traffic problem. Mr. Clark said that there is not much that could be done. He discussed potential problems and solutions with Mr. Engelbracht noting that there is stacking room to keep the delays on the Arbyls site. Chair closed the public hearinq. Decisions Mr. Glasscock noted that there are good points to the design that have been brought out. He hopes they will work. He moved to recommend approval of 2-90-0126 Motion was seconded by Mr. Engelbracht and unanimously carried (6-0). Iii. Hold a public hearing and consider making a recommendation to the City Council with regard to amending the Denton 1 Development Plan by expanding the boundaries of the special 1 Purpose Activity Center. 6-1 1 i y 14 t iy a P32 Minutes FrP December 12, 1990 Page 4 Staff Report: Mr. Persaud reported that in June 1990, the Texas Department' of Commerce approved of two Enterprise Zones for the City of Denton under the Texas Enterprise Zone Act. The purpose of the Enterprise Zone is to induce private investment in distressed areas by removinq unnecessary governmental regulatory barriers. Mr. Persaud; reviewed the boundaries of the enterprise zone with the Commission. The Matsushita project site considered earlier in the year is a proposed expansion of the enterprise zone. Because of the location, land owners feel that they could gat a large corporation to locate there. They want to aggressively market the area. The proposed expansion of the Il Special Purpose Activity Center will absorb low intensity i areas #101, #102, and /103, and part of Moderate Activity i Center #95 and #105 as contained in Appendix A of the Denton Development Plan. Staff feels that the locations warrant the expansion and that the Fort Worth corridor will attract an economic base for future growth. Staff considered the factors looked at by the Appendix A Task Force such as physical boundaries, and Crawford Road which is the Denton/Argyle ETJ line. The recommended expansion looks like a large area but contains a lot of flood plain. He reviewed the boundaries of the proposed expansion with the commission. Mr. Holt asked about the unnecessary government regulations. Why have them if they are unnecessary? Mr. Persaud explained that it means for example, that tax robates could not be granted if there was no enterprise zone. It removes barriers. The wording was taken from the Texas Department of Commerce. An enterprise zone is to encourage development in an area. Mr. Holt said that wording sounds like developers might not need to abide by regulations. Mr. Robbins replied that the City is looking at removing barriers to zoning by amending the planned development (PD) process and adding planning areas, it is a continuing effort. Ms. Brock asked how such control the City is giving up. Mr. Persaud answered that the City will continue to do zoning using the PDs which give site control. The sign ordinance and landscaping ordinance are also in effect. 6-2 PAZ Minutes j % D ecember 120 1990 !AA FT Page 5 Mr. Holt ar.ked what would happen if someone wanted to build homes in the area. Mr. Robbins said that the economic base would have to be protected from the residents. The onus would be on the residents to do buffering. The City is not considering a zoning case at this time. This discussion is about long range planning for the future. This is a good site to develop as an economic base. The infra-structure number crunching was done when the site was considered for Matsushita. Mr. Engelbrecht clarified that intensity does not apply in the enterprise zone. j Mr. Robbins said yes and when more easily what people will be able to tell y types of uses will be allowed. Mr. Holt asked if the City has made a lot of tax money from Texas Instruments. f Mr. Robbins said yes. Industry is the main part of the tax base. Mr. Engelbrecht asked if the expansion would create a desire to expand along the other side of I-35 as well. Mr. Robbins said that they will probably be looking at the west side of 1-35. He is not sure a special purpose activity center is needed up and down both aides of I-35. 1 That issue lies in the future and is not being considered tonight. Ms. Brock said that industry can be more attractive than high density housing. Mr. Engelbrecht said that the special purpose ictivity center does not preclude that situation. Mikel Reynolds of Henry S. Miller Co. (H8M), 2001 Bryan Tower, Dallas, stated that they have owned the yroperty for years. They industroscts low pintensity they lose interest. The Donley Company looked at it and then located in Midlothian. He stressed that they want good employers but the companies don't want to fool with intensity. In a few weeks, HSM will submit zoning applications for a business park that will show industries 6-3 1 t ~ w I1 DRAFT p&Z Minutes December 12, 1990 Page 6 the City's intentions. it will be used do not anticipate high rise uses. a 30% is marketing plain. Recommendations Mr. Pereaud stated that staff recommends approval of the expansion. Chair closed the public hearing. Mr. Holt moved to recommend approval of the expansion of the 4C,. Special Purpose Activity Center. Motion was seconded by Mr. Appleton and unanimously carried (6-0). IV. Hold a public hearing and consider making a recommendation I to the City council with regards to amending the Denton Development Plan (DDP) by expanding the western boundaries of the Denton Planning Area 10d9dello delineating 11 intensity part areas 110 91 100 950 1050 1070 r Appendix A. Staff Reports Mr. Persaud reported that the DDP considered r the Long vast, range efforts approximately looki :square miles. a study planning area of framework for future planning is needed. Now is the time to move the western boundary of the study area. The western portion of the Denton planning area is characterised by large floodplains and large tracts of land under one discuss landowners Planning ownership. staSome ff o to the large the futures planning and development of their tracts. The Perot Group (TPG) has propered general concept plane for areas west of 1-35N and is currently pursuing the annexation of 920.42 acres east of 1-35M. The New Market Group Southwest, Inoo has met with staff about a large tract west of the TPG property north of Crawford Road. RMB Realty has been pursuing a general development plan for a 912 acre tract located in the southeast corner of Highway 156 and U.B. Highway 360. The inclusion of these tracts into designated intensity areas is essential in order to implement the policies of the DDP. Staff is now proposing to extend the western boundary of the Denton planning area to include a larger area in Denton's J extra-territorial jurisdiction. The western boundary description: is as followss 6-4 I r p„ ,rrz S P&2 Minutes ~L~ A F December 12, 1990 Page 7 "Beginning in the north at the intersection of Highway 156 and I-35 and following Highway 156 south to Hopkins Roads then following Hopkins Road to the Denton/Krus8TJ line to Highway 1561 then following Highway 156 south to the Ponder/Denton ETJ line to Florence Road1 then following Florence Road south to Crawford Road and then following Crawford Road to Denton/Argyle 1V.V Agreement C, line." The expanded Denton planning area will make it possible to delineate low intensity area number 110 to include the area north of Crawford Road and east of Florence Road) and to redefine boundaries for low intensity areas number 1, 9, 10, 107, 109, and 11. The proposed expansion of the Special Purposed Activity Center will absorb all of Low Intensity areas #101, 102, and 103. Mr. Persaud discussed the planning area and intensity area boundaries. He said that staff is recommending approval of the areas as delineated'. No one was present to speak to issue. Chair closed the public hearing. It was moved by Mr. Engelbrecht and seconded by Mr. Appleton to delineate the planning area and intensity areas as recommended by staff and to amend the concept map to reflect the changes. Mr. Appleton said that he thinks it would be a good idea to communicate these changes with the property owners. Ms. Brock said that the expansion of the special purpose activity center should be a story in the newspaper. Motion carried unanimously (6-0). 6-5 / devpr ATTACHMENT 7 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CONCEPT HAP OF THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO PROVIDE FOR THE EXPANSION 01' THE SPECIAL PURPOSE MAJOR 1 ACTIVITY CENTER; AMENDING THE BOUNDARIES OF INTENSITY AREAS It 91 10, 95, 1051 107, 109, 110 AND 111 OF APPENDIX A OF THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. I WHEREAS, the City has established enterprise zones that would merit the expansion of tho special purpose major activity center shown in the Denton Development Plan; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended that the special !purpose major activity center be expanded; NOW, ~ THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION_;1 That the Concept Map shown in Exhibit A, attached to and incorporated into this resolution by reference, is approved as the amended Concept Plan for the Denton Development Plan. USTI N II. That Intensity Areas 1, 90 10, 950 1050 1071 109, ` 110, and 111 of Appendix A of the Denton Development Plan are I amended as shown on Exhibit B, attached to and incorporated into this resolution by reference. SECTION III._ That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1991. BOB CASTLEB£RRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: 7-1 WF W, 1.~ S Exhibit "A" ti CONCEPT MAP r - ` _ J' LEGEND: NORTH - ~ - l- . Urban Centers Aectivity Canttoor Major ~ ~ I1 Moderate Activity Conler I -j 1 YY ~ _,r L_ ~ Lev MltepMy AIeM 1 `.'r i +r our u 11 T 1 •f~ ~j ~~~lLe1 ~I i •wrr ~ aaarlae sew Y, ~ ` ~ aws~rtlaae oepartmM e.er 'C42tV 0I end wwwym.m ' r r l _ ,may f 1IN/1!t ARIA • AltfOt. ROf QQ= ate- A0f3f 1XV SO11NDAIT D1140NIPTION Baat1 t-35 Weal FM 156 Notthl FM 156 Southi Gan:at Road i •1 i1 I 3 1 i y 1 Z I ~Q t 'p I 1 • I I~ • i1 I I I !!i~ l i I aNZFA ROAD ~OAW orrn.r~trruw raw 7~3 I 1 S 1011911tt ASIA 8 APFt0f/11g1 1658 AOt11 101911DART 01110117T10M tuts Egan Road pests FM 156 Norths Jackson Road and Krum/Denton ETJ Souths U.S. Rigtwap 380 C 1 1 ~+raH..a• , ROAD V r err r i W HWY. 3916 i ~ 1 ~ e ® aw.rmom taw 7-4 s E r I11:rx~IST ARIA • 10 APPILOZ- INS 182.91 A102" i 10UNDARY 018021PTION Eases Mauch Branch WOW Dry Fork Crook Northi FM 1173 South: Jackson Road= I I • r V I r -FM 1173 1 1 ~ I I s JA~CK801~1 PAM 1 ~ wAw 0:11 at KWM ~aWeAf 44 I r 7119113NI:-IT SIA 98 1S■ 51.54 ACIt1 iOUNDUIDILININ Consider incorporating 7.80 acres of open space and 17.28 acres of general retail (as shown on YD-118 concept plan) in the southeast corner. The northeast corner should contain 15 acres of developable land. C17~ r r / A4LRtQ ROAD . r / r f ~ PROM / is AC~r LOON t fta • i 17,20 1 11 61 a 900 INS f / f 7-6 `S awdamoft loos { r MO~ r I L 1 INTiM1[TT ARIA • lof Iqf I' 31.47 ACfp i ~ IOOM6AlT.0lflfhL[>K1f i Encourage the historic preservation of Pilot Knob on the southwest corner of this intersection. The developer should have the flexibility to design and layout the site. The moderate activity center west of I-35W should not exceed 20 acres of developable land. i i I MOPgffO / 4L ' f L0bq !fh 104 PILOT KNOO ALLAO ACAO , i i i i , i i ' / i i i i / ®.n,►.r..r nor" 1 7-7 f ~ S r 4 l INTIK@t'IT AIBA • 107 AtPROS-ia■ 2185,01 A03" IOOKDANT DSIONIP?I N Easts Hickory Creek Westr C. Wolfe Road North: Tom Cole Road (Match Line) Souths FM 2449 MATCH LWE TOM COLE ROAD -`-"i AF PORT k i FM 2440 j I i 0 2000 7-8 O"didek it tow A ^ MI INTRN8ITT ABRA ♦ 107 APfROisB[Rli 2186.01 AORss WMENNOMM"Onwo BOUNDARY DUOR[8T[ON Last: Hickory Crank Nutt C. Noila Road North: Jim Chriatal Road South: Tom Cola Road (Match Lima) i i ' JNA CF~A4TAL ROAD f ! v i DSWON AFPM W TOM MATCH LMT 7-9 Omer 8Mr110i1t "x" 1 t h I t A 1 IXTBXIITT A22A • 109 Alr~os, ona 4500.18 Acau i •OOXDAZT 018021tt1ON East: C. Wolfe Road Waat$ Ponder/Denton ETJ and Crawford Road North: Match Line South: Crawford Road i MATCH LINE ` • OWN PONDER/ • • DENTON ETJ 1; , *a, sad% t _ 1{ Z a•• NEW a i V` 7-10 r1.T`ad IT~µ i I 1 J I ' NO SCALE ~ II ®O1Hi M 1M/OK f11tq J I I 1 ~I 1 w t Igor vrrt S 1 INTBXSITT ASIA • 109 Aliptozoste { 4590.19 Acilu BOUNDA19T DIOOLI►TI01I Easti C. Wolfe Road blast: FM 156 and Ponder/Denton ETJ North: Jim Christal Road South: Match Line - FIORD 1 PONMt DENMN E%J MATCH INME ~I FIFNO SUE I~ 7-11 ® arty M omwm FIX" i I FSS ASIA 110 "?Role $us A02U Match Line Floronce Road i Lively Road t Crawford Road I `I r US HWY. 2149 f ~ i 4 7-12 l (A NO S ® OW at BOOM nWAS I t 1 r MdXFrF F ~ L e 1 INISNIIII ASIA • 110 APPROX. 602 8930.87 AORM SOVNDASY DLOCR!!?sox Eastt I-35W W4sti Hatch Line Norths US Highway 380 Southt Crawford Road lell US HWY. 2448 ' e~l CRAWFORD ROAD / ra scAV= ®arrr ask p Wd fox" 7-13 I r f 1 A.R~iY!q(i~ INTSNMITT ARIA 0 AIPPSOle 8=3 948,78 ACIW f .ter...- r NOUNDA=T D88021lTION East: Egan Road West: FM 156 ' North: U.S. Highway 380 South, 312 Chrlstal Road r~ f t f MNY. 30 j _ II 1 ~ J f Z~ 1 7-14 ®ear a/ MM1im 1fNA~ j ~ e 1 DATES 01/31/91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TOs Mayor and Members of the city council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A TAX REFUND TO COMMODORE FINANCIAL RECOMMENDATIONS The Tax Department has mailed an Overpayment Letter and an Application for Refund to the taxpayer. All completed forms and necessary documentation have been returned, requesting this refund, which the Tax Technician recommends. E i SUMMARY: Chapter 31.11 of the Texas Property Tax code requires the approval of the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $500.00. Commodore Financial has requested a refund in the amount of $575,72 due to duplicate payments on account number 6703-00500. 1 BACXGROUNDS , Commodore Financial paid the taxes on November 28, 19891 and the title company paid the taxes on December 29, 1989. Tax records Indicate payments of $1,151.44 against a tax base of $575.72. A tax refund is due. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEDS The Tax Department and the tax account of Bluebonnet Savings Sank. FISCAL IMPACTS $575.72 Respectf aub tte r j { Lloyd V Harrell Prepared byt City manager Vic Schneider Tax Technician i Approved: i Harlan L. Jef s Treasurer 2996k/I i 1 / M01 TAX REFUND a t.n.r«+yraae.re APPLICATION, FOR ~ Ildwd AMae.t!M lt.tttNp} 'f Wien - -Pef Collecting Office Nama p Pn o►~ / fax niri Collecting Tax For. , /f~~- frt n e e Y1 0 Address City, State, Zip Code r-rwrrrrr r. wwrrr in order to apply for a tax refund, the following information must be provided by the wpaI IDENTIFICATION F PROP! TV OOWNO- Name: Address. l Telephone Number Sit additional Information s msededr IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: Description of Property. I Address or Location 0 1 Propertyi zi n ~o or Tax Receipt Numixsr Account Number of Property I INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES: Amount of Name of Taxing Unit Year for Date of the Amount of Tax Refund From Which Refund Which Rend Is Reques Tax Payment Taxes Paid Requested Is Requested led 7 3 ~ i 12L to I a l it s 1. /~11g fZ = 2. 19 3. Tares were a` fwre / taxpayer's reason for refund {attach supporting documemtstionr fib ~ Cl0 de e~vKa~ o-F Aerr t'. P ~n a S "I hereby pDly for the r nd of the above4esenbed taxes and ceroty that the tnformati n 1 w given rm this form Is trw a d correct I S/ p d ! ie on for Tax Refund DaU of PD c~c S'f Signature A Sll~~~r r~~l wwrrrrrrr- rrrr- - rwr_rwrrrrrwwrr_r - Disapproval DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND: - Approval Date Signature of Authorized Officer Date Signature of Presiding Officer(e) o1 Taxlln el Umigs) for refund applications over pow+rO9016,werdshalbeeubWloom dWA klemlms POISON i. McFAsaanaM Any t»v wwo "Will" lake entry MW net mac than if years per IMa ~~the to srA uo~~~a/ea^e~t0~ esdll,000abeMUwoAhf~eMlTOr ~~NSeI ImFrbon"WI; t. coname"M N forth In beetion 31.10, Panel Cede. wpb s, I 1 ~ ` r 1I1489633775OISS OF TAXES' •ts11eI98. i ~ I 1 OlsbureemenUCleaflnp 0'55335 btu CuefoClel Account OID AFT sn'Ay§ CORIOAATI HEANUARTIRa CR NUMUR 0141 ,,~o1a jM MIQjM; COMMOiX4 i 1114ANCIAL SERVICES 033775 Comm RR SAVINGS IfSbf AT711S70 P.O. Sod :d4 • DAl LA%, IE%AS W21-2" _ CNECa DAN PAT iRKRY f 11-14-89 033775 PAY filel' I 05? •OOtARS ANC CENTS f RE11e198.52 , foaDER TAX' OFFICE" DY DENTON CITY COMMODORE FINANCIAL /ERM 215 Ca NCKINNEY'STa IcoR►. MUNICIPAL BUILDING UENTON9 TX 76201 ice?"•!~~' !sdlirr,~.~: - k1033945a1 43113431382: no59oo63B603M, r c 1 4. ~ I r ~I I Ii , • 'lTS~LbE;tZ~~~ Y.` r7N r ' $y77bTQ-871 j Q,St4:'t'.~ •'ti 5.3 ~1•t1~Sxr ~•.+.:T. 7 4. i a S ~ C " s COMMQDOM FINANCIAL SERVICES PATE 11/14/,Vl ?N Z - 32---_----___-MACH IN EE-"UISSUxSEMENf-CHLCK-VOUCHEF--------------------------------- _-_------r_bc------i-rJ i -4 x.,r, TRAM BANK O35A 4MOWi* ' c +x ILE'#101 `•INIT NAME; CODE NUN NUM INV DESCRIPTION DATE DUEV ' ski; e. 77 15630}~ EHNISENFR '72DCDI09 777 1003 0730'-01400 11-A9 2f 5.1E I&N67! KD'11OWWAY 720 :1010: 7717 ICC3 179C-00600 11-89 2:0.37 ' j 16290' CE KENIFF 720 0010.' 777 IO"3 2350-COPCC it-8o 428.34 ''7000 RJ GLENJ 720 00100 777 0503 39CI-70206 11-89 562.44 J 1a0A'. '`".`AJ'B'Afir 6L'L''72D 00100 777 N503 3902-01200 11-89 539411 11 .9i9 TL HARRIS 72: C51C, 777 1:5,.3 1034 T DAVIDS.QN 720 0010D 777 H503 3505-01300 11-89 ' 727.44 1744 rA yYA,gBAOUO 7207 OO,103 777 1003 3932-00300 11-89 322.54 * ;I 16dZ IN 1Otj 720 0010D'777I003'3932-01000 11-89 346.52 I6Q,,,w ~.I 7 7107:;777: 10034790.-00200 11-89 238699 15 ICN 720`'OOIOS 777 1003''546-0 G ~ y ' -01600 ii-89 181.97 11-89 loo52 7 {~4 8'6;703 00507 ;511 8,9 575ajt ~ 7 P s' k f t ~ 1: r 60100" y77I0 1 6867-00270 t " t":ar~4'pl i' 2 S ° :11=89 573.5 ! s.r''.; 'a ,'r ; iy +.'150 y N NIEY 120rCOIOD 777 1001 6870-01800 11-E9 423607 ? a ;+A7~ + •,~.r !ref •'•C;P{+ D EBERSOLE 720 00100 777 ?464 604?-011^0 11-89 a r. A+: t.j tiE 5710+ GM J1! 72: GG1vJ 777 1142 73c „lrr, 11-^0 9~a-A' r5>.: Y USi ILt 726 C. 1L: 77' 4.52 C. RF 1. • 7i. t "1C•+ ?77 1. j G ,.SUSS:C 7L^ .s S[q: rG CNF.ISTEN 720 ! 1C: 777 1.03 o5 :4-CC4=5 lI-C? i °E7: J+ Y R 71; 777 C3CC ~iC -:C7416 11 '.3F•.S ''EIS I4':6L! 72C :C1777 OCC 99x5-;'f 772 11-Fri 411•Sc, 31t I IrNUL 72: uCItL 777 C3Cc t9C5--,-L773 11-e° 42d.11 EE 74 T61ALS 27 ITEMS 11155.52 1: . 'toN MY b j . YRwNrr....u•n...ul+W.T •u_Yann•N.++v.•. . w. 'n 1 1 'ttt K',; TA>< TRIAL I~E .TRIi,R x f/-1AfE fAk OAIO 61Iklis TAROUEIV FI TjVE YTOTEflr_~IO~fT,d C01[ ACAOM ia rue y 414 4541 f All ~ 1'llC 1 ~ ~ xr~~i 11~ 1 ~i i j i. , fj~~ ~ ~ . . `5 .t ~I•v la! 1,15, 1~ 1 , ! ,1 r 1 / 4 ` 9PJ000YQiU•w'►..L♦L.~..- LL•K.-tom. k1 ~ `j lH 1 ,~.r yt ~ ~Il1 i 1T ~ ` 11 ~ :.t t'..' ~ 1 /R4VIIAT~~• IITt 1 , 12/24 7♦~b[. • 1 MNLW MMLI. . .1♦TMf~ LIM..\ .a Ili 1 fey 1 , 1 • 1 • 1 • j',, i • ,IiT • 1.' li_ 1 1. i • •S9• •1 '159 S' ern.. v,~ „ i 1. 11 1 rx r 1 YRRM~YYi • 1 • . . e i «K.L1l ♦w.11~ .w...«h r ww.~aa .ru.iatll. i[il~L 0 ' y , ~ ~I;il~.a., , 1y 1 1 J / 1 ~rY.~ y:.• r .1 ,,ry } } 1 .1 i • r • is • • in- ...N r,+ a ....1 r 1 ...lzw 511, 511. ~ , , N T 11110 629. 0e4005ee X919 TORUS 671000600 1919 _16 lu S 61 i l H DATEt 01/31/91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 5 2 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A TAX REFUND TO BANC ONE MORTGAGE t RECOMMENDATION: Banc One Mortgage has shown proof of payment and the Tax Technician recommends a refund. G.: SUMMARY: Chapter 31.11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $500.00. Banc One Mortgage has requested a fund in the amount of $2,286.15 due to an erroneous payment on account number 31505, ' BACKGROUNDt II! Banc One Mortgage erroneously paid the taxes on this account which their client no longer owns. They made a payment of $2,286.15 on November it 1990, t PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: The Tax Department and the 0x account of J. S. Coffey. FISCAL IMPACT: $2,286,15 4 Res ect IJ ? y sub itt d !I Prepared bys Lloyd Harrell i /mow City Manager Vic Schneider Tax Technician APprovedt I Harlan L. Je s Treasurer 2996k/3 1 i 1 S i rob rp"Wor TM oars APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND r3.wne NMM st ttluesf Collecting Office Name t✓/T C ~P n ion - a,L~ ~p Collecting Tax for (Taxing nits u ,C'z-P 0A A n et/ S741 &A7140k . /~c 762U~ Address City, State, Zip Code - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - In order to apply for a tax refund, the following Information must be provided by the taxpayer. IDENTIFICATIO OF P OPE TY 11ER: Name: ' n e-V y Address- Telephone Number (if additional Information Is needsdk IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: 6C~j ,~C re ~e3, SI.Z Description of Property. dl34 ~ ~e Address or Location of Property. g ' Account Number of Property or Tax Recefpt Number. INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES: Name of Taxing Unit Year for Amount of From Which Refund Welch Refund Data of the Amount of Tax Refund Is Requested Is Requested Tax Payment Tax" Paid Requeeled 1. e&Of &A 19 I'L~ Nnoz 1110 0 f12- 2. 19 S 3. 19 / 19 S 8a,rn Doe /~orT ,yai~~~t Taxpayer's mason for refund (attach supporting doeu ones ' lerrivv~ 00 tonaer Owlit z2 &dc Ae j r Crlf~ Q a I'&r4VKrl o f -Iq e. &-dcy- /ivt IlLyt-/e ^I hereby apply for the re nd of the abov♦deseribed taxes and certify that the information I have given on this form Is true end correct" X /Z * k Signature J07 Date of Applicetlor3 for Tax Refund Qsf s~ 7X_/'3_Z DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND: Approval 01"pprovsl Signature of Authorl:ed Officer Oats Signature of Presiding Officer(s) of Taxing QaN Unit(s) for refund applications over a Any per"n who mean a taste entry open Me kneeing rewd 6W be eub(est is am of Mefosesin pauldw 1. NrPAeen, ant of net more than 10 yon nor Ian th" 3 years Anew a Ana, of not more than M,000 of bent wah Ana VA ImpMeamenq 3. eanAmotnem In IsA Iw a term up N 1 yew or a fine not is exceed KON of bath such Ana and w4riseentsnt nut , Iwo In section 31. 10, Panel Cede, POW* 3111 ~ w f , 1 r- NO. 0271 L4XKONE, TEXAS,N.A:, SWC50NE' ~T11 WN itMt ; o.aa. Tlwn Taaot MORTOAOE COMPANY TEXAS.` 9 ° e if i + k rIan MMKETCENT[nn aLVO, ~ t . } ~f~ OALt,A1.Ti 7E7b7,:' t> fl~i 21 14 OOLLMtS ANO 91 CENTS r 1Q j ~f}., ***31~81~•96 ,!**f 5~e t PAY r ToOp0E11'' }4 EaC>f0 diaaUJ+}" NT ACCOUNT NTON air stam STREET , 1 ' 90 -4aK as 110'! lQ 60~ auco~•hts I a'0t712IM 10 1 1 1000 6w: 060 1000 4 2 1 7 P400030149V J r S t, " 1 r' r ~w ,I t I i I .!i6.,Q 110~:1:',lt.A~i ].e CARNW. 4W 0 0 - S- + - 11, I r ~I YY ~,t ~ I ~ I Y if Cr tt 1,. a 't r'.' V1 dill • I ~ i I i I I LJ I I 1 I i i i I 1 r' t , DATE 10/23/90 EStAOW/SUSPENS E DISBURSEMENT CHECK REGISTER IRV734 PALE 32 4V LOAN NUMBEK NAME VENDOR REFERENCE to PROPERTY ADDRESS OUST MAT•OATE Oise AMT 0 ___0210162400_.BROWN DAVID_____.217/1___BELLAIAE-OR1YE_ 12/01/90_. 290.12 . 0210171176 8AA11N 0 29566 $IS CAMPBELL AVENUE 12/0t/90 369011 ' OZIOL60493 ORITTAIN K 23143 609 CORDELL STREET 12101190 263067 01 02 L0400950__MEAOOR OVEN _29666__` , 213.1*1GUNA__DRIYE _ 12/01/90__._ 257432_._..-. +II f, ' 0210402491 JOHNSON M 32617 1001 COLT STREET 12/01/90 133461 ~,i 0210402525 WELLS D 23103 48 604 CRE E STREET 12/01/90 171468 _ 0210402533-ROGSTAD.__F_ 31097 4206_SELfNE_OR1VE 12/01/9015)•41 0210406696 GOODY ARTHUR 26950 224 BELLAIRE DRIVE 12/Ol/90 261.10 P ' 0210407763 ROBERTS RORY 31354 3$01 SAGEBRUSH DRIVE 12/03/90 305• 1 ' 0210412300_, JOHNSONJAY 236121120 _CONGKESS_AYE6 -_-12/01/40 396.79 0210413498 COLLIER W 24337 1222 COLT STREET 12/01/90 290049 0210414312 MENNEN J 104944 3324 BROOKE STREET 12/01/90 474.12 0210414619, - SKOWKONSKL __6 _._105262_ 1624 MAY-STREET- _ 12/O1/9O 433.44 0210415301 NAOERI HASSAN 30467 2505 LIBERTY LN 12/01/90 411.44 0210415410 VILLANUEVA R 0210 4162 51-STARNES-_JEWELL___ 9424! 1004 BULL RUN 12/01/90 360627 103455--__._.___ _ __.2906 BEVERLY I2/01/90 - - 414406 01104!7499 ROHANDANI S 32316 ll3 6LUE&IRC +'IACLE 12/01/90 337.14 1 c 02104163/0 RARTINKUS 0 29266 305 CAMPBELL LANE 12/01/90 32).41 __0210900419___AELIN6 TIMOTHY. 1. 105061 612 ROYAL MEADOWS.-________._12/02/90 344691 " 0210909602 MASSENGALE MARTHA M 120961 1027 BRITTANY DRIVE it/01/90 362.25 02LO910428 MOOGES CARL W 153654 2604 BAUER OAtVE 12/01/90 490.96 1 0210910642-MCNAMUS_- 6RAD_._ __M _121009___ 12/01190 -_60~6{.3L V ' ` 000910 09 .,6AsON 900 Y C 22101 .15 BRIT b17 tP949 BRYAN A 2617 BAU[K DRIVE., 11/O1/90.' J itl$I 424 615 CORDELL.STREET_._._ _ 12/01199 261.§7 1 0210912515 SMITH RUSSELL J 153651 2332 SAUER DRIVE 12/01/90 495•)1 n 020210912606 10912611_..MAMI NESTERS LTON__ WILLUM MICHAEL 6 E._26659--_ 22610 1)29.514 VICTORIA ORI DRIVE.VE 12/01/90 12/01/90 664111.63 646.,. 1 i„ DILOI12079 FORD JOHN S 30326 2309 WINDSOR DRIVE 12/01/90 50601) 0 02LO912887 HALL 210919121 + STESSINS___--ROBERT A 23T2T 2414 SAL9DOQQ0 PLACE____.....__.__!/01/9C 5]1646 - APPLE t 0210914642 YOUNG WILLIAM E 127410 3005 HOWARD COURT 12/01/90 423011 i' 011091SIS►__NANCE -__.._GRAdAM 1._01041 ___..110 MAGIC OR1YE_. 12/01/90 l60.41 0210915371 WILLIAMS JOSEPH R 6 L53647 2616 BAUER DRIVE 12/01/90 446.52 0210915476 btLES DAVID W 12455 2414 SHERWOOD LANE 12/01/90 522.63 0210916156_6AKKER__ __TNO9AS.____. S._31614._ .3600 0009EA..BRANCH WEST-_-__L2/01190 !21614 ~ 02109L7365 NEAL DAVID K 39121 ISOL KENOOLPN DRIVE 12/01/90 336.40 ^ i 09109LB900 LEWIS DAVID W 25644 2102 MERCEDES ROAD 12101190 1T0644 ' 0710402405__SWISHER__._SAMUEL___.__,.____10411S_._,..__._ L432.KINGLROM__ 11/Al/40 40.0 0110412366 SMITH MAAION 26645 1919 WESTWOOD DRIVE L2/01/90 396442 0710419516 NESS MICHAEL 21331 900 MAYNES STREET 12/01/90 $31•l$ 0910L10641___MANiKI-__-S23161 3601 GRANADA TRAIL__ l2/pl/9J 14430613 0910401114 BROWN E 32625 517 PARKWAY STREET 12/01/90 292461 1 0910401452 SMITH J 104111 3309 NORTH BONNIE OR41 12/01/90 1061.17 ~ 0910402742 MORYAN A 21156_ 2117 S10NEGA1l (2/01/90 916.15 1 I 1 I _ 1_I + 1 a~ ESCROW/SUSPENSE OSS6URSEMENT CHECK REGISTER SRVI34 PAGE 33 J GATE 10/23/90 LOAN NUMBER NAME VENDOR REFERENCE 10 PROPERTY ADDRESS COST MAT•0ATE D[f6 AMT 20S-SOLAR-WAY +2/OL/90 S7t•9 _.0410402666-_6RANOT_-- ERIGR 122703 2712 CORDOVA CIRCLE 12/01/90 290.13 09LO402246 LAWSON FRED 29411 12 H14HYIEM CIRCLE 12/02190 l9OS3.16 15519 091040130E PRICE D 10426 2016 PARKSIOE.ORIVE__ 12/Ot/9D 434.11-- 0410408327_ .EASSA___ __....LARROLAS. 204261 12/01/90 261689 0910409101 GAINEYAN LARRY 22636 1420 NSOR DRIVE DR. 02/01/90 4T2•L9 0910409265 GAINER VAN 1OS312 6pS WINDSOR _ 2312 WlNOSOR.ORIVE____ --633069 j _ 0910411630 HEMBEROER-- ___--30364 109 20ROLLING HILLS C!R[lE 12/01/90 0910412634 ANDERSON C TIM 020E ISHERLTO STREET 12/01/90 446.60 2229+ 0910413419 LEWIS STEVEN 12/01/90 0910415470 COOPER 4 26645 12/01/90 349041 3!6.TO •I 0910419110 EWELL LANA 21164 1104 WESTCHESTER DRIVE 3412 ORIOLE LANE 12/00/90 0910406164 FAULKNER HONER L 32169 - ----t32 A!INERSLDAlY.E 12/01/.90 _ _492.65. V 0910906940,__ BROWN------ __LINOA._2__26032_ 3013 GRANADA TRAIL 12/01/90 11e41.06 04109109TS SEIT2 WILLIAM D 130643 108 ALLISE CIRCLE It/O1/00 41f.lS 81104145411 NOROMAN J 103316 CHECK AMOUNT 3LI864.96 ~a CHECK / 027121 ESCROW TYPE 32 PAYEE DENTON CITY USER_. WANOA_- -_.VENDOR/AGENT_00216 _ - TAX toPACKINNEY STREET 6ATCH NK10230S DENTON TR 71201 j ITEMS 61 fi 4. , V _ y~ y y .n' Y y _ i y 44 e 1 ~A~ r V.SMMyy■c■r■ 4YI1tij K{'~ IOR040~ Oi/09/9 AT 6729 ---0 Y E A P A V M E N T S PAGE 2 ACCOUNT NO* RECEIPT NO• NAME ADDRESS AMOUNT STATUS OF PAYMENT 6 3 -3 OUSE. RONALD E - ~SVkNTDALE 130.04 OVERPAY 9990!000000 90/03/21-0576 GOLDEN GATE MONT 17072 OVERPAY 36691000000 90ro3/L27-1010 sGsREAT WESTERN BANK 0 321-323 FRY 634.96 OVERPAY Y-bLAK Y ENGf1E REP - 1HUNDLEBl 9 A7/!T- •0 HART N L!K! ETAL SNBOhNICf IBRAE OVERPAY f AJ/27- 6/ IDEIIAtyNON! LOAN 414 CORP GARDEMYIEYt• ] OVERPAY 5 90/0 /2 GOLOtN GATE MLGNTN'~~ORR cue llllllEM ssii 9 EYENAY 34391000000 90/03/27-1106 FULL GOSPEL ASSEMBLY CHURCH 0 52.94 OVERPAY , 16957100000 90/03/27-1290 $1 K9 ANN C•. ET AL MOCKINGBIRD 22 1 6.72 OVERPAY 4 VERPAY yppD 1 py-r[[!`~ 0 .6 O t-u3lj -O-0 ~90 O faO gy~p COUNT TROPHIES 0 729 LOCUST ST IN Y a 61636000000 9043/25-039 YEATTS9 DALE E LARIAT 15101.64 OVERPAY t' 310010000000 990 /A~3//~2p-0j06~}6 YKAN4A5GEGyE.• ~MICHAEL F MISTYWOOO 465.33 OVERPAY i 0 9pQ76 13~ i7i YATT NOyApD LIILIAM 0 CA!l-p HE l H 0 9 0 3/3 ++v•`` 4~ELL • KENNETH We p `~V"' UK- -pt*PA 0 0 90/ J/7 - N3 ;Q CORDON KING% ROW 33 ~ VlRPAY 0 0 90/04 02.0403 GOOOGAME. GERALD D ASPEN 72974 OVERPAY 4JOTl000000 9044/02-1 41 FOUTS• T J SR 0 0.01 OVERPAY !96100000 90/04/02-1114 FOVTS• T J JR O SHADY OAKS DRI VE 0401 OVERPAY QQ Y LAW A K C 0/ 1 r 0 Nj DAL Be d b!A"iLl ~*i~Rifa► ; y AY p 9 A4/ 2-iiqy FIRST STATE BANK OF DENTON OAK FORREST CA 199615 OVEPPAY 66610 000 90/04/ 3-04L/ NLATH MILLARD COUNTAT CLUB R 0.01 OVERPAY 672000000 90ro4/03-0456 WAIGH~9 EDWIN E JR 0 9.00 OVERPAY 88~$B35S,~ affi WILLOW 0 9 44/'0 p{f4a • ARK JOHN ! jot NsNE 2•T A 0 90//004/6S•CM~EE.Ei A CHARLES REID N 0 NOT T NGH AM BRA DYWI J!♦ A D00_.4Dt0{/di- LTA_Sif011AS OR • V A t 36600 000 90 932 PEARSON@ OPAL LEE ALICE 157•LL OVERPAY 4 I • 0151• 000 90/ 4/04-0040 WEAVER. CHARLES B CRAIG 0.40 OVERPAY p 61460 000 90/04/01.0041 MIOOLETON@ NARK G STRATFORD 32.15 OVERPAY a ON ?A 9 / / b0 -4/0 + 1 R 0 ~X9lN~[ L tREr A EMU _ !6 00 90/04/ T-925 CNNEt►ICVttENATL BANK EYERS PARKWAY 2.pppp py[RpAy E 000 0 9 14/OT-025b CONNECT CVf NATL BANK RAMEy 70 •/3 OVERPAY .lDDD0.0_90/94LOL--0256 totilECTe.Ut NAT' RAMC R~MEV 27 •36 OVERPAY I - ~NlY :A6.ae evcMn6y r c t A 1 w 3 n,.^ V.IIAYa~ r DATES 01/31/91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A TAX REFUND TO NEW START PIS RECOMMENDATION: The Tax Department has mailed an Overpayment Letter and an Application for Refund to the taxpayer, All completed forms and necessary documentation have been returned, requesting this refund, which the Tax Technician recommends. SUMMARY: Chapter 31.11 of the Texas Property Tax code requires the approval of the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of ! $500,00. New start PIS has requested a refund in the amount of € $754.68 due to duplicate payments on account number 117377. SACtf_ 0_ ROUND: I New Start PIS made duplicate tax payments 20, 1990 and August 31, $754.68 on their account on records Indicate payments or 51,509.36 against aactaxi base Tof $648971. A tax refund is due. i' PROORAM3 DEPARTMENTS OA GROUPS AFFECTEDS I The Tax Department and the account of New Start P/S, i FISCAL IMPACTS $754,68 it 41tespect y submitted Prepa red bye rrell r f Vic Schnoider ; Tax Technician Allppl od Treasurer 2996k/2 www CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REQUEST FORM* DATE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 5, 1991 ITEM TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA: C:. 1. Word item exactly as it is to be placed on agenda. Include any Advisory Board recommendations. 2. List backup materials (to be submitted no later than 5:00 p.m. Wednesday$ prior to the Council meeting.) 3. State the order in which the item needs to appear on the agenda. A. Tax Refund 1. Consider approval of a Tax Refund for Commodore. Financial for $575.72 2. Consider approval of a Tax Refund for Banc One Mortgage for $2,286.15. 3. Consider approval of a Tax Refund for New Start P/S for $754.68 t B. Backup materials consist of the Application for Refund, copies of the front and back of the {I cancelled checks, original receipts, and copies of City records attached to the proper forme, C. Order on the agenda is at your discretion, THIS FORM IS TO BE SUBMITTED BY NOON OF THE MONDAY OF THE WEEK PRIOR TO THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING. Note: Please use a separate request form for each item that is submitted. 3956g 14 f K" i r' APPLICATION FOR TAX tarr,ee,p.xean zt.ttlaren REFUND t Collecting Collecting Tutce Name: C+ yV 07 erx7 okj T Qt AllI ~-~in n e sr sf ax ng n Address ,e^ I LA T 76 2U) City, Stale, Zip Coda Y ^^A In order to apply for a tax refund, the following information must be provided by the taxpayer IDENTIFICATIA,N OF PRQP RTY qYN Name: S Address: i Y Y Telephone Number (if additional Information is nseded~ IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: Description of Propertyda Address or Location of Property Account Number of Props rty of r A of i.,, .,.,,.,pl Number, INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXIES: Name of Taxing Unit Year for From Which Refund Whleh Refund Date of th• Amount in Amount of Is Requested Is Requested Tax Payment Tax" Paid Tax Refund Rpwa1W ~ 1. = AL V 2. n 9= i to LL 6 $ Taxpayer's reason for refund (attach supporting documentesI r-`I AI re /h er rvl~; ~e w 57 ~r T~ rte, y raj;, . a reG~ r,o~ Joe zLlP a t~er,oe vsn rn I hereby apply for 1.4 refund of the abovsdeecrlWed taxed and csrofy that the information I have given on thle form Is true and correct" Signature Dan f isppliuWoon for Tax Refund .1. r................... . r... r....... w r r... V DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND: Approval Oiaappeoval Signature of Authorized Offlesr Dale Signsture of Presiding OfNoer(a) of taxing Unlgs) for refund applications over 1500 Gs1e Any Neon *he mebss a hies entry utin site lersplns taeerd ehall bo otw set M sMef the net mere 1144" 10 years nor lees than ! years "dim a 111I ef tow ttmra ow 111S.01 arbo* 11. Inoloo-so VA im/rieenntenb S. eeneAsmaM In (all for a term up to 1 year are Sna net to eeeeed IIA440 or bent such fMe and Inyrilsaaa lnt 1011@11 font In Session 3?.10, ►enaf cede. l~ ~.1 A T'XDR C I T Y O F D E N T O N - T A X S Y S T E M ACf.T. NO: NAME: 890600487 NEW START PIS WESTGATE WEIGH'T'S PH 1, BLOCK 1 . 117377 LOT 6 YR TAX F''/I TOT 89 551.46 104.78 656.24 TOTAL TAXES: TOTAL P / I: TOTAL, TAX + P/I; '351.46 104.78 656.24 COLLECTION FEESGRAND TOTAL ° TAX, r'/I, AND FEES: 98.44 754.68 ,flP D81yr, , IL 2 ~r7clTY j t 90600482 1990 THAU: 890600496 1989 6 10 90 Mth~r TAX rAtAl ~1t A "n tit 1121 wAll tuxpwn rn mm CA ! ~ 8:~ TR,Mr1/f tn1 532:- m: CO,rllTBTXL $m7lt 1 iI , 12111• ut:- ~1""lfttllAR 1 adif 1 ; f R: Tuurnl lass ~2: `4caMr Te ~t:19 i l../ 11,T 12.x- AQ/! YMrgIN aJi : : !31.11 .Ob , 331511 r: "Amm 14 12111 312A ;88 "'kw A 31! . ti t1,ACT A 312 F M to 1, ~~l1 IRA 12111 1T1:1- :N N1:kaarir TOTAL 1H1:i1 ~ Big I '"AL. A **A iibl 1 10 MAO 111: . 8 N Nat to I M:8m TMMMN 11101 *"S S - :88 '2'~ccaikr t 3s~~ U8: T11r11MN ,2x11 110: :88 •`7kcewlT T 110 jY . , ~101001f~ r! N~NIYf / two u8:1 12111 110 :1 "Ol / 41Ql 'S r i4 l:It KI rnr.Nn 121:, ss3: 188 s"A cawr > : I flu; 1 RI 12111 311:1- :88 '"Xtcarlr T 'mm I ~ ! 090600497 1990 THAU: 890600512 1989 N 10 9C tn~~ ~r AltrOMT-r t4[ TAX TRIAL rrr T8K ~ c A PO-rAn TAX 1121 ~1r tw PIP' 1 1 I 1 i 2651L-1/3689 NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulatod competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equip- ment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor, and WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted herein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the numbered items in the following numbered bide o~-r maEeriale, equipment, supplies, or services, shown i:► the "Bid Proposals" on file in the Office of the City's 'Purchasing f Agent filed according to the bid number assigned thereto, aru i hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bide for such items: BID ITEM NUMBER NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 1117 ALL BK QUTIOXAL SUVACEg 914.299.00 1205 AL,__ Wksco $35,099470 long ALI, -gpbQ1111111AN P20PAn MIJIT A 1919 AM tiQ 1110P ..asrrn Twc- - LI3.9Ab.e0 - 1214 ALL l1ARTIN LrAOLE OIL EMIDIT E w ~ M SECTIOtJ II. That by the acceptance and approval of the above i of m the persons submitting m the bids for such bids, the Cit accepts the offer purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in 1 accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid Proposals, and related documents. SECTION III. That should the City and persons submitting approve an accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the hereto; that s, conditions which the written contract the written contract is in saccordan e attached specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums containeA in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein approved and accepted. SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbere terns of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the to amount a and in accordance with the approved bids or pursuant contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become ettective imme ate y upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 11991. JJi BOB CASTLBBERRY, MAYOR 1 I ATTEST: i MUM , CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: ! DEBRA.ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY i 1 BY: - PACE TWO 1 r ~ v, DATE:FEBRUARY 5, 1991 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #118T-SYNTHETIC FLOOR REPAIR NORTH LAKES RECREATION CENTER 1 fl~4QMME2i~ATI43i we recommend this bid be awarded to the only bidder responding; Recreational Surfaces Inc. in the amount of $14,299.00. .a~MMARji This bid is for the repairs to the synthetic floor in the North Lakes Recreation Center Gym. The floor was damaged by flood water in April and May 1990. The damage has been reviewed 'by a representative from the Federal Emergency Management Agency and repairs have been authorized. Federal Emergency Management Agency has committed to reimburse for 75% the cost of repairs. The balance will come from 1990-91 budget funds. ~d~SflHS~Hp: Tabulation sheet. P>34SsB8Mfl~_2&PSHTMEHT__QB~SrSQSEP~_l1FPE~TE~ Park and Recre ',ion Department and Building Operations Division. I 1 Agency ElFunds "AL-IMIAM 107 5% from reimbursed budget Federal Emergency Management Respectfully submitteds U ~ _r Lloyd .-Harrell City Manager 1 I Approved` bey ii i Neme: .'om D. Shaw, C.P.M. Tttle: Purchasing Agent i TS/jh 115.DOC 1 ' I i 1 1 I T- WF ( E BID i 1187 I RECREATIONAL I I BID NAME SYNTHETIC FLOORMORTH LAKES I SURFACES I = I INC. OPEN DATE December 18, 1990 I I I yI I 1 J i I QTY I• ITEM DESCRIPTION I -VENDOR I VENDOR I .1 I I I I I I 1 I Lot IReaurface Synthetic Floor 1 $14,299.00 1 1 l I I 2 E INumber of Days to Complete I 7 Days i I 1 1 J r' 1 1 1 r r^ DATE:FEBRUARY 591991 QTTg_~4L.gL;L_fl.flE48T T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTt BID #1205-STREETLIGHT HEADS SE44h(1~EHQITIQHs We recommend this bid be awarded to the lox bidder meeting speoification, Wesco, in the total amount of ¢35x899.70. AJIMIJAll: This bid is for Streetlight heads and lamps to replace warehouse stock. These heads are used by the Electric Distribution Service Department in replacement of damage or faulty streetlights. ~gggQygQ: Tabulation sheet, Memorandum from Don McLaughlin dated January 22, 1991. Warehouse, Working EBQS~BATl~~_~PAflTd&bT_gfl_S~fl4liP~._flPFEQTEQ = Capital 8 Electric Distribution-Service Department. PI$ScAL_ITSpAS~T: Budgeted warehouse aoot #710-043-0582-8708. Respeotfu y submitted: Lloyd Harrell City Manager Prepared by: Name: Denise Harpoo1 Title: Senior Buyer Approved: Name: Tom D. Shaw Titles Purchasing Agent DH/fh 109.DOC F B E0D 1205 1 I BID SrRE LI(iE1r FFUU I MCM ~ 00. latMa MTLY I TIME ]M. IMUM EIB=Cl PRTEM I ! I I I Dc. CPEN DATE 1-1541 I 1 I ! I j I 0 1 IM DESQiTMCN f vE7+mOR I mmm I vmm f VE= I ypIDCR 1 ! I I ! 1 I 2857&M SrRE MlCi I N/B I 0,10 1 $46.oo I $48.75 ! !68.95 I 1 I i ! f J 2 I 28576.600 SrFEEMMtr I I $59.74 1 $57.20 1 $60.75 1 $60.55 1 J ! I f I I I 3 1 28576500 SrREE=(W I f $51.93 1 $46.00 I $48.75 J $62.65 I 4 I 28576-750 ST I I $109.15 f $90.50 1 $96.15 1 $108.25 ! J I J I I I I: ! ALTMIE I f $87.92 1 $82.65 ( $87.65 1 $87.15 1 I I f I 1 1 i 5! 28576-700 i i $117.43 f $92.65 1 $98.20 1 $116.35 1 ALTEFMTE i ! $100.001 1 1 $99.951 6 1 28576-725 Sr1n=cliT 1 I $117.43 f $93.80 1 $99.45 1 $116.35 1 i I I I I I I ALTERNATE i i $99.901 1 I $99.001 7 1 28550-560 Lff I I $12.35 1 $16.08 ! $17.05 1 $23.75 I I I 1 1 ALTEMIE I I $12.601 I j r I I I I 1 ! f I J I F>l:m INAT SM aa=c I I &MY I I 1 1 I rm4 DIi9oA>PT m I vgm I YE~rooR I I 1 1 1= 28576-550 SrFEE'II.T c i $45.10 1 $48.90 1 2 1 28576-600 S1T1F>r7iM 1 466.20 I $60.90 I I I I 3 1 28576-500 SrfdEll. w 1 $45.10 J $48.90 I 4 ( 28576-750 MIiPEII. Gw ! $89.00 1 $96.43 1 ALTERNATE i $81.12 1 j 1 5 i 28576-700 $90.92 i $98,48 1 I' I ALTEfddATE I 1 ! 1 6 J 28576-725 SPRfET1. Gn I $9'e.10 1 $99.74 ! 1 I I I ALT'MaTE f I I 7 i 2%50XA LAPP i $14.50 ' $17.13 1 ! ALTERNATE I 1 J I I I 1 i F CITY&DENTONMUNICIPAL UTILITIES / 901•ATexasStreet / DentomTX78201 M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: Denise Harpool, Purchasing Buyer FROM: Donald L. McLaughlin, Electric Engineer Administrator DATE: January 22, 1991 SUBJ: BID 1205 Award bid 1205 to low bidder, WESCO. On item 28576-750 Streetlight purchase the alternative bid American Electric catalogue number 113-06733. Shortly, I will send you an update of the specifications. DLM:th 01221164: j y i UI 1 1 14 1. / DATEsFEBAUAAY 5, 1991 CITY COUNCIL REPORT 1 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FAOMi Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1206 - PROPANE CONVERSION PILOT PROGRAM RZOMMUDAIIQg: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder Suburban Propane in the estimated amount of $13,576.00 for labor to install Ialong with a one (1) year lease of conversion equipment, and approximately 17,000 gallons of propane fuel. HHHARD This bid is for a one (1) year lease and the labor to install propane conversion kits on ten (10) vehicles. The vehicles being converted for the pilot program are for four (4) door police sedans, one (1) 1/2 ton pickup truck, three (3) 3/4 ton pickup trucks, one (1) 1 ton flat bed truck and one (1) 1 ton service truck, These units were chosen as random samples of our fleet that have comparable units that will continue to operate on gasoline. Logs will be kept on both types of fuel for comparison on cost and operation. The test program will run for one year or until it is determined to be adversely affecting the designated vehicles. The quantity of fuel on the bid 17,000 gallons, is an estimate and the per gallon prices will also vary according to AMOCD posting as listed in Butane/Propane News. Transportation and profit are bid firm at .1350 per gallon. Included in the bid is the use of a fuel storage tank, a refueling facility and training in the handling of propane and the mechanical operation of the conversion equipment. It is our intent and desire I.o have preliminary figures on the conversion program in time fir consideration during the budget process. DA4d484Sj)jDs Tabulation sheet. pB9anha,__pSPABINKE1---42__IIfl.QUTA-_-AFIMUS Fleet Operation Division, Motorpool and divisions participating in the pilot program. will be funded from working capital lbudget funds. The program m will be funded from 1990191 budget funds for fuel purchases. Preliminary cost figures indicate a savings in fuel cost significant enough to offset the labor and lease payments. 1 FEBRUARY 5, 1991 Page 2 of 2 CITY COUNCIL REPORT Respeotfully submitteds Lloyd Harrell Prepared bys City Manager Names Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Titles Purchasing Agent Approved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P~.M Titles Purchasing Agent TS/jh 118.DOC i i I i 4 4 r BID # BID NAME 1206 I ) I r PROPANE CONVERSION r ( r r SUBURBAN i f f ( OPEN DATE PROPANE ) ENDERBY ( NORTNNE,T r ) ) 1-15"91 j ( BUTANE r I I ' ACCOUNT # r I f r f r r r QTY ( ) ( j ) _ f ITEM DESCRIPTION f r ~_f ) r j - 1 VENDOR --VENDORE ~ 1 1 f ( ANNUAL LEASE PRICE FOA ( ) VEOR`-r r f STORAGE TANK 6 DI r f`---'~-r f SPENSER } ) ) 2 r 1 4 ( LABOR 1" t INJECTED V4RDRON ) f E1•00 r 4 r 11.00 1 2 IB.FUEL INJECTED SE AtIC DAN r 1320.00 ( I r jC' CARBURETED PUPA TRUCKS I 1240.00 ( 1420.00 ) 3 f r 1 1200,00) 1420.00 ( 1 .00 j r ANNUAL LEASE PRICE PER ) 1420.00) 1150.00 j 1 4 IA ( CONVERSION KIT + r I 1150.00 ! 1 4 .FUEL INJECTED 4-DR SEDAN r ) r I 2 IB.FUEL INJECTED 1 pU 3 r j IC, CAABURETED PU A TRUCKS t•00 j 132.50 11.00) $155 ) 4 ri7oooj 11.00 r 132.50 . 00 I ~ I EST.( FUEL COST ADDER OVER r $32.50 I 1155,00 1 11100 POSTING r ) r 1100,00 j r r (TRANSPORTATION/PROFIT) ( r r ) ( j ( r i DELIVERY 10.135 ( 10.185 r 5 DAYS 10,12 J j r ) IJ I t fr 30 DAYS Ir 7 DAYS 1( I j f t ) I r , r f ( r r( Ja 1 1 t R t EXHIBIT A { BID f 1206 I r cil 1 r BID NAME PROPANE CONVERSION r I ! SUBURBAN ( I PROPANE I OPEN DATE 1-15-91 1 1 I I ACCOUNT f I I f # ( GTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR 1 1 f l ANNUAL LEASE PRICE FOR I I I I STORAGE TANK 3 DISPENSER 1 X1.00 I . I I I I 2 1 J IA.FUEL INJECTED 4-DA SEDAN LABOR CONVERSION r I $320 4 IB-FUEL INJECTED PU 6 TRDCKSI .00 1 I 2 IC. CARBURETED PU & TRUCKS $ 1 240.00 1 ( I 5206.00 ! 3 1 ! ANNUAL LEASE PRICE PER 1 I r CONVERSION KIT r 1 4 IA-FUEL INJECTED 4-DA SEDAN 1 I 4 IB.FUEL INJECTED PU & TRUCKSI $11.00 1 ! 2 IC. CARBURETED FU d TRUCKS r 5.00 $1,00 1 4 1170001 FUEL COST ADDER OVER I EST.[ FMOCD POSTING I r 1 I (TRANSPORTATION/PROFIT) I I I I I $0.135 1 DELIVERY 1 5 DAYS j r I ( i i 6 i h' DATE:FEBRUARY 5,1991 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1212-FIBERGLASS TANKS y I BEf~MdE~IpATIQbs We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder meeting specification, Metroplasties Inc., in the total amount of =13,986.00. AMMIJABI: This bid is for purohase of two fiberglass tanks for storage of demineralized water at the Electric Production Plant. Bd&BflB9!lS~II: Tabulation aheet, memorandum from Jim Thune. Pg4Si8611~~_~EELHTlIEHT_Qfl_4B4liPS_AFF6~TE~: Electric Production. PINAL_111ZAM Budgeted funds account #610-080-0251-9205. Respectful y submitteds Lloyd Harrell Prepared by: City Manager Name: Denise HarpooI - _ Titles Senior Buyer Approved: Names Tom D.'-She Title: Purohasing Agent DH/jh 114.DOC S BID # 1212 I ! I I I METROPLASTICS I I BID NAME Fiberglass Tanks f ASSOCIATED I f INC. I FIBERGLASS I j f ENGINEERS I OPEN DATE January 24, 1991 I I I I 1 f i # I QTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION ' VENDOR I_ I .l 1 I VENDOR I r r I f r 1 1 2 1 121 DIAMETER X 20' FILAMENT $6493.00 1 f I WOUND FIBERGLASS DFMINERALIZEDI E100981.00 I I WATER STORAGE TAN" PER SPECS 1 I E I 1 I Delivery: 1 55 DAYS I 42 DAYS G 1 1 Addendum Acknowledged? r YES r I I xes I . r I I r I f fAlternate B1d: f i I I ;6,456.00 I 102 Ft Dia. x 18 Ft)f I ! + f 4 1 a ~ J i i 1 1 JI "J i 1 0 r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ELECTRIC PRODUCTION OfVI510N 1101 $PINCER ROAD DENTON, TEXAS 16205 I T0: Denise Nanning, Purchasing Agent f FROM: Jim Thune, superintendent of Electric Production jj DATE: January 28, 1991 SUBJ: BID NO. 1212 - FIBERGLASS TANKS Regarding the above referenced bid, please recommend to Council acceptance of low bid from Metroplastics. These tanks will provide additional demineralized water storage capacity In efforts to improve make up water reliability and elaytthe1needCfor aldandneralizbuduetsade. Funding for this item approved Thank you, Jim Thune, Superintendent of Electric Productlon JT/ks Utilities cc: Bob iNelson, ixecutiverDirectortof c s File: Requisition #126467 XXYI s ~ i 1 e : r.- k F y DAT£:FEBRUARY 5,1991 CITY COUNCIL REPORT T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1214- #2 DIESEL FOR ELECTRIC PRODUCTION glQQMMUMA1I411s We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bOipolrS. Martin E910 averageapriceiperagallon01 OnrJanuaryr 13 1991 then cost was $ .7325 per gallon. Estimate of expenditure is $7420500.00. A0111A : This bid is for the possible purchase of large quantities of #2 Diesel fuel, which maybe used for Electric generation in peak usage periods, brought on by extreme cold. r weather. This bid selected a vendor and set a mark up or delivery price in case this fuel is needed. The DPW O.P.I.S. average (Oil Pricing Information Service) price may fluctuate but the mark up will remain the same. The bid states fuel will be purchased as needed or possibly none at all. ge~gQ$Qy~ps Tabulation sheet, Memorandum from Jim Thune. EflQflaAMS~_pEEAETM&2iLQH_QPQ.UEj_AEFEQTEIli Electric Production. FISCAL-WAr1l : Budgeted funds scot #610-060-0251-6202. Respectfully submittedi Lloyd Harrell City Manager Prepared by: C--- 1- Names Deniae-Harpool Titles Senior Buyer Approvedi C Names Tom 0. Shaw, Titlei Purchasing Agent DH/jh 116.DOC BID / 1214 I I I I I I K4M IN EAGLE I NATIONAL On. I DOUGIASS I REELER DI.ST. BID NAME #2 Diesel I OIL I & SpRY CO. I DISrRIBTF M I I for Electric Production I i I I i 1 OM DAZE Janmryr 24, 1991 I I I I I I I I ! f I CTK ! IZFN MICR37TICN i VF?DOR I VEVR I vow I YENDOR f i _I I I 3 ! I I lestimated I 1 I 1 I I t 1 t ,000,000 f 02 Dim. RM OIL FOA I I I I I ge~]].cra ; f7.F1"cFQC1T1f {;~7fI1TiON i I I I I [ I MT PR= ! >Fw crs Avo. f f NIB I I*v Opls ANQ+ I i 11 1 ! I +I +I _ G ZZAmNc%F RuAoTiON/P80F1R 1 $0.0100 1 10.0429 1 I Q0.0150 I I ! I I I I I j j l I I ! I f 1 1 j j Demme 1 1 DAY 1 t DAY ! I 1 DAY 1 i f I I I I I (a) NOT DFN OPTS AvERAGB NR' PRICL I i i i r q'rM.. ti i SID 4 1214 I I I I I MANM EA= 4 NAaTCNRL OM I DOlX7 M 114F~I811 oast. I BID WE i2 Diesel i OIL I a SUPPL7t 00. I DL4PAIH fl= I I for Klectrio Prodwtion I I INC. I I I I I I I I MEN DATE Jarwary 24, 1991 I l I I I I S e I CAY I ra~1 t 1'ICN I M MR 1 vrr R i VERM 1 vr3 m lestim~ared I I I I I I I I I I 1 110000,000 1 ill DIEM. 6Z1tL OM MR I I I I I I + I mmmm Gt3r UTICN l I I I S I I [ I I NET PMM 1 >xW crPls Avo I * 1 N/e 1 DF11 oPls W. + 1 E I I I I I I' TRLVP F4MaVPKM ( $0.0100 I !0.0429 I I $0.0150 I I I l I f ! I I I I I I I I ; 1 I I I Ddiverys I 1 DAY I t TiIY I I 1 DAY 1 I NOl DPW GPIs AM" ' NET M= 1 i f i i 1 J r h , rrr:. xr:~ 1 , CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ELECTRIC PRODUCTION DIVISION 17011 SPENCER ROAD DENTON, TEXAS 76205 TO: Denise Manning, Purchasing Agent c: FROM: Jim Thune, Superintendent of Electric Production DATE: January 28, 1991 SUBJ: BID NO. 1214 - 02 DIESEL FUEL ' Regarding the above referenced bid, please recommend to Council acceptance of low bid from Martin Eagle. This order is for the fuel oil to be burn in the steam boilers should it be necessary due to curtailment of fuel gas. Thank you, Jim Thune, Superintendent of Electric Production JT/ks cc. Ernie Tullos, Director of Electric Utilities Bob Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities File: Requisition 0126498 XXVI : f AV- 1 r C L ^a 1 I~ I i EXHIBIT B 1 BID # 1214 1 MARTIN EAGLE I BID NAME #2 Diesel I OIL I for Eleetrio Produotion 4 4 OPEN DATE January 24, 1991 i - # I QTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION i VENDOR f ~ -I I I I ~ [estimated I I I 1 119000,000 I #2 DIESEL FUEL OIL FOR I 4 I gallons I ELECTRICITY GENERATION I ( NET PRICE I DF1r OPTS AVG. E f I I I I I +1 1 1 TRANSPORTATION/PROFIT I $0.0100 I I I I I I [ I I Deliverys I 1 DAY I I I ~ I 1 I I 2651L-3/3689 NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PROVIDING PROVIDING OF PUBLIC FUNDS THEREFOR; IMPROVEMENTS AN AWARD OF FOR THE EXPENDITURE FOR ' EFFECTIVE DATE. i WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the construction of public works or , improvements in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has received and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works or improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and plans and specifications therefore; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the following competitive bids for the construc~ t~l public works or improvements, as described in the Bid Invitations', "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City's Purchasing Agent filed according to the bid number assigned hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids: AMOUNT BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR BS ..oiw.ctCAL, ~p0 r, $275,143.50 ' 1141 CBS t t ai CNSMMCTi0N ass t,42b.11 ..es...ranrTVr _ TwC _ 74 336.00 ~~nt J - J~ - - 1 SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above competitive bfa's shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the bid for construction of such public } s 1 works or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such person shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice i 1 I 3,Y• • i Pr.Yy t"v~ 1 r to Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notifi- cation of the award of the bid. SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all necessary written contracts for the performance of the construction of the public works or improvements in accordance with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and Bid Proposals, and documents relating thereto specifying the terms, conditions, plans and specifications, standards, quantities and Specified sums contained therein. SECTION IV. That upon acceptance and approval of the above compet tills and the execution of contracts for the public works and improvements as authorized herein, the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized contracts executed pursuant thereto. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective imme atdi-eTy upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1991. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERSi CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADA4I DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: PAGE 2 r r ya. ~;,t rr. 1 DATE:FEBRUARY 5, 1991 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO. Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager 1 SUBJECT: BID 11143-AIRPORT INFIELD DRAINAGE HE&Qtltl8~1BdTI4~ls We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder, CBS Mechanical, in the amount of $275,143.50. "bbddys This bid is for the labor and materials to improve the drainage in the infield area of the Municipal Airport. The project consist mainly of removing old metal pipe drain lines and installation of larger concrete work. The costs for this project are higher than normal drain lines due to the requirements to bore under runways where open cuts are not permissible. The project was designed and engineered by Freese and Nichols Engineering at the request of the F.A.A.. Ninety percent (90$) of the cost will be funded from F.A.A. Airport Improvement 1 Grants. The remaining 10% will come from 1990-91.budget funds y intended to compliment this grant. 1 @dScbQB41~2+ Tabulation sheet, Memorandum from Freese and Nicola date 1-15-91. fLQSlBdtlS._4EEd~TtlB)1T_QB_IlBQiIPfl_dEP~S~TFps Airport. FI~IldkIMPd~T: 90$ F.A.A. Grant Funds, 10$ City of Denton 1990-91 i Budget Fund. Aoct 1402-002-AG03-0001-9108. j Respectfully submitted: Lloyd- Harrell City Manager Prepared bys { Name: Denise Harpool Title: Senior Buyer Approved: Name: Tam D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent DH/jh i 117.DOC h t i I 1 I I 1 HID i 1143 ADDF2dJlM fIrI ! I 1 I I I 11 HID Nff AUKK nFmn I LDU7,SIAFfl. I AM G M. I CME ^C^ ! S1uMW I (8S I lanua I Oa6rR .SON I 1 OCtSrR moN = OORP. 1 1IDf MCAL I 1 MW DATE JANUAR)c 8, 1991 1 f I I I I 1 ; I I I I AmUMT f = 1 I I ! 1 MY I IT94 MOUFTrON 1 vow ~ VEW 1 VOW 1 VEM I VEM" 1 _1_1~ f I I ! ; I 1 1 ! 1 1 ' 1 ! ! AREA 1 l 1162,968.00 I $162,451.00 1 1141,580.04 1 4163,865.00 1 $151,041.04 1 1 ! ( 000.00 1 $134,985.00 1 $131,560.00 1 $145,3'^-.00 1 $115,530.00 1 j 2 1 I ALT I FOR ANA t 1 $99, 1 I 1 1 1 f 3 1 I ALT 2 FOR AREA 1 1 $2,575.00 1 15,391.00 1 46,375.00 1 $4,975.00 1 $20834.00 1 4 I 1 AREA 2 f $76,009.00 1 $71,196.00 1 $63,817.00 1 $75,453.00 1 $64,939.00 1 1 I ! 1 5 1 1 AREA 3 I $91,982.00 1 $76,380.00 1 0,664.50 1 0,758.00 1 466,333.50 1 1 I 1 I 1 TOTA1wrm ALT. 1 1 $419,959.00 1 $445,012.00 1 1409,621.50 1 $454,386.00 1 1387,843.50 1 I I TOTAL WM ALT. 2 1 $32'3,534.00 1 $315,418.00 1 $283,436.50 1 $314,051.00 I $¢75,143.50 I BID HOFO 1 YES 1 YES 1 Y 1 YM 1 YM 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 ! I 1 I 1 ' 1 1 , I 1 ! I ' 'j j I I i a SAN.. ~.M[E W %If11-10 Pt VLO ROLaT l Hikr HE "l Freese .t i Hit PE LE R FREFA PE RFOYERT . 5 uxkH. PL AND RXP.Lt`)%fs.PIE I ANf NK gI R) PE. PF . I;ARI RF Es N i/'~ V~ ~VCsNC, GAR) \ IN P III PE aHO RI E. Y[%LOOP E CONSULTING ENGINEERS nulMar a PE. BONNIE 41 IU, Pk. MICNAFI LNICI-K%S 5 NIChKXS, P.E. \ January 15, 1991 CARRY" CRECO" PE 1 W. EXNE)TCLEMERT, PE. IERRY L. KEMNG. PL M1RCNAEL G. MEMRISON, P.t. Mr. Tole Shaw gHNL,mES, Pi. R. NEIL PRL'Rt, A.LA. co . E. F.E. CO~MNLVN P[. City of Denton Purchasing Agent MUNn R R 901-8 Texas Street Denton, T% 76201 Re: Letter of Recommendation Airport Infield Drainage A.I.P. No. 3-48-0067-04 Bid Number 1143 OTH90076 Dear Mr. Shaw; Pursuant to the bid opening on January 8, 1991, attached please find our Bid Tabulation which shows CBS Mechanical as the apparent low bidder. CBS's bid had a minor mistake in multiplication on Bid Item number 40. This is corrected in our Bid Tabulation and had no bearing on the determination of the low bidder. In order to g.t all three areas constructed the most economically, it is recommended to award the contract based upon the sum of the base bid for Area I. additive alternate no. 2, and the total bids for Areas iI and III. Additive alternate no. 1 is therefore recommended to be removed from the contract. Looking at the Bid Tabulation, the low bidder for this basis is CBS ! Mechanical with a total bid of $275,143.50. It is therefore recommended that the contract be awarded as indicated to CBS Mechanical for $215,143.50. Very truly yours, 1 ' FREESE AND NICMOLS, INC. j Jerry L. Fleming, P.E. Project Manager r WDW.04 i Enclosure xc: Joe Thompson Willie Viilalobos, FAA II 1 HILIPHO!NE 117 3767165 III LAMAR STREET FORT WWII. TEXAS 76102.7687 RECTCLID PAPER FAR 117 177.4267 MEIS0617 4241100 I M Awl DATE:FEBRUARY 5, 1991 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1185-WILLOW SPRINGS DRAINAGE BbidF~dQMe!ffi1i2ATIQ1Ir We recommend this bid be awarded to the low r, J-N Construction in the amount of $463,426.11. +S.NNABIr This bid is for the labor, materials and supplies to . Install the specified drainage and other related items in the Willow Springs area. ~e~aQaQ2: Tabulation sheet. Memorandum from Jerry Clark dated 1-25-9 t, f Eg~4 --Q2Q.UA AUE4IF2r Engineering Department and citizens utilizing the affected areas. EI~QAL_IL~PAQTr C.I.P. Bond Funds aoct 1432-002-SB85-8516-9105. 1 R/Wf ly submitted: U Llarrell I Prep ared by: City Manager -4G.Y t j Name: Denise Harpool Titles Senior Buyer E i APprovedr V Names Tom D. Shaw i Titles Purchasing Agent i DH/jh 111.DOC 'f pa 1 ~1r CV a f BID 0 1185 1 1 1 I , I I I I 1 I 1 BID NAME NILLONSPRINGS DRAINAGE I DICKERSON I THOMCO CONST. I J-N CONST. I I CONST. I I I I I I I OPEN DATE DECEMBER 139 1990 1 I I I I I. 1 1 ACCOUNT 0 I I f ' t I QTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR i VENDOR _ ~I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I BASE BID 1 $644,333.50 1 $460,362.33 1 $443,771.11 I I I I ( f I 2 I I ALTERNATE 1 NIB 1 N/B N/B I I I I : °b 3 1 ; UTILITY RELOCATE I $21,175.00 I $110450.00 1 $19,655.00 1; I I I+ 3 1 $665,508.50 I '461,812.33 1 !463,426.11 1 4 I I I BOND I YES I YES I YES I I I I I I 1 , 1 1 I r 1 1 I i 1 ~ ~ j I 1 ~ a r I I 1 I I I I s I I 1 I 1 I ~ I I I 1 I I 3'. I ; I I ~ r - f s { t CITY ofDENT0N,TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING DENTON, TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE (8170664M MEMORANDUM DATE: January 25, 1991 TO: Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent FROM: Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering 6 Transportation SUBJECT: Bid 1185 - Willow Springs Drainage 1 The low bidder on the project is J-N Construction from Richardson, Texas. They previously did some good work for us building the bridge for McKinney street crossing Pecan Creek between Frame and Bradshaw streets. The bids received were I above our original estimates done in 1985 by about $145,000. Considering the original planned start date was 1981, inflation has had some major effects on costs. Also in 1987, there were a lot more contractors available to do work so a low bid leaving a significant amount on the table was a regular occurrence. This project has been delayed since 1987 by litigation with Ali j Khafagi. We had recently signed an agreement to complete the work but now have received word that the lawsuit has been dismissed, we feel that 3 good companies bid the project. Bid prices are above past projects but that has been the trend on all work let for contract lately. The bid and the additional funds requested were considered by the 091' Committee for approval on January 18, 1991. A recommendation of approval was forwarded to City Council for final consideration. Please place this project on the agenda for February 51 1991 for consideration of approval. l ~ y C r 0941E 41 DATErFEBRUARY 5,1991 CITY COUNCIL REPORT t TOi Mayor and Members of the City Council f FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager j SUBJECT: BELL 01201-BELL MCKINNEY INTERSECTION I ! Gic U92H SPATIQl4: We recommend this bid be awarded to the only bidder Larry Manning, Inc. In the amount of $74,336.00. I JMHKAPYs This bid is for labor, and materials to widen and repair the intersection of Bell and McKinney streets. Larry Manning, _j Ina. was the only bidder but his bid price was under the engineers estimate of $80,000.00. gAQEQgQQgQs Tabulation sheet. Memorandum from Jerry Clark dated 1-25-91. PBQQEAM~~_QFiEASTMEliT-0--9R9MIA-AEIEQTEQr Engineering Department :.nd citizens utilizing the intersection. EISQAL-IMIAQTr Budgeted CIP Bond funds acct 0 436-020-0087-9105. Respectfully submittedi Lloyd- . Harrell - - City Manager ' Prepared bys !lames Denise Her Titles Senior Buyer j i Approved: Names Tom D. Shaw Titles Purchasing Agent DH/jh 110.110C 4 BID # 1201 i I l LARRY tM@MM I 1 1 I I I BID WE w1<inm @ sell S n c. intersection IMrovementsl I I I I I I CM DATE aueery 240 1991 I I I I f I ~I ram EESM 1TCN S vow 1 VF?>DOR I' VEUR I BASE BID I !741336.00 (Asphalt 6 Cmxmte) I I I , ( X75,858.75 I I I c' ALTEBSVATE SID (All Ca o*te) I I I I I Bid Bad? (Yes/tio) I YES I I I I I I 1 i i~ I I I l 1 1 CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE(817)566.8200 i MEMORANDUM s, DATE: January 25, 1991 TO: Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent FROM: Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering & Transportation SUBJECT: Bid 1201 - Bell-McKinney Intersection f The project was placed out for bids again after only one 1 response was received for $90,000 and this was $10,000 over our construction estimate of $80,000. We felt the response was not adequate to guarantee reasonable pricing. The recent opening again had only one bidder but the prices have come down to $74,336. The savings from the rebidding are $15,000. Our new ]ow bidder is a local contractor in good standing. We feel the project should be awarded to Larry manning, incorporated. They are completing the last stages of the sidewalk project now and will be available to complete the I work on schedule, i JEJy CV 0941E i RNA, f + F 2651L-5/3689 NO. i AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FCR PURCHASES OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WHICH ARE AVAILABLE FROM ONLY ONE SOURCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 252.022 of the Local Government Code provides that procurement of items that are only available from one source, including: items that are only available from one source because of patents, copyrights, secret processes or natural monopolies; films, manuscripts or books; electricity, gas, water and other utility purchases; captive replacement parts or components for equipment; and library materials for a public library that are available only from the persons holding exclusive distribution rights to the materials, need not be submitted to competitive bids; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to procure one or more of the items mentioned in the above paragraph; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: 1 SECTION I. That the following purchases of materials, equip- ment or supp es, as described in the "Purchase Orders attached hereto, are hereby approved: C PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT -11995. TRAYyTr ENrjryEELtW A jcaxmnic -$74.886.00 119E uco. INC. - ~iz.nen.nn SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above items a a not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the quotation for such items until such person shall comply with all requirements specified by the Purchasing Department. SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any contracts relating to the items specified in Section I and the expenditure of funds pursuant to said contracts is hereby authorized. I 1 e i I SECTION IV, That this ordinance shall become effective imme e 67y upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1991 I BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR J ATTEST: p JENNIFER WALTM-0 CITY SECRETARY i APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: 4 ; S rr DATE,FEBRUAAY 5,1991 CITY COUNCIL REPORT 1 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM, Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTi PURCHASE ORDER #11956-TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND CONTROLS i IN THE AMOUNT OF $74,886,00. 86~4MMEti~AT141~= We recommend purchase order to T.E.C. in the amount of $74,886.00 be approved and the material placed on order. 21I11MAflYs This purchase order is for the single source purchase of { fourteen (15) multiple phase traffic signal controllers for the following projects. 1. 8 controllers for Bell Avenue in the amount of $40,098,00 II. 2 controllers for MoKinney/Audra and 111ndsor/Sherman in the amount of $11,596.00. III. 4 controllers for Eagle Drive in the amount of $23,192.00. ProJeot 1 8 3 will be 75% reimbursed by the state as part of the TLS Grant and TH Grant respectively. The controllers are sole source and available only from Transyt Corp. through their authorized distributors. Due to compatibility requirements with f the City of Denton closed loop system no other controller will preform satisfactorily. Transyt controllers are protected by patents and software copy rights and therefore exempt from bidding procedures. 8A4dQB~1iti12, Purchase order 11956, quotation from TEC, Memorandum for Jerry Clark dated, 1-25-91. j PA44BAM;~~__PE~ABTML2iT___QB__IlE43~E;S___AFFES~2812+ Traffic Control Department, citizens of Denton. Z122AL_111MIt Funds for the purchase of these controllers will come from state grants for 75% of item 1,2,3 and 5. The balance will come from budget funds as well as the full price for item 4. (See memo from Jerry Clark date 1-25-91 TLS and TM Grants). 17~ -W 1 r„ aw FEBRUARY 51 1991 I Page 2 of 2 1 CITY COUNCIL REPORT I Respeotfully submitted: Lloyd arrell' ; City onager Approved bys - Names Tom'D. Shaw, C.P.M. I Titles Purchasing Agent TS/jh 112.DOC I i i 1 r owl CONFIRMING ORDER (IF MARKED) I-ff PURCHASE ORDER NO: DO NOT DUPLICATE H d~eevas appear s an PC 11956 tins., boxes, Pack Inng d(psseand bills. leq No: eIe No: D ~ Date: 01 29 91 Page No, Ol DOR PURCHASING DIVISION /90 f 8 TEXAS S rREET I DEN rO N, TEXAS 76201 IE/ TRAFFIC ENO* L CCNTAOLS INC8f7/38371000lFWMErRO817i761.00f2 FAX8f7/3824682 RESS P 0 80X 73 93-2 1 0 00 HYV DELIVERY 75 N CENTRAL RECEIVING S25 HUNTSVILLE TX 77342-7393 ADDRESS ENGINEERING i 1 409-291-3110 90DENTB TEXAS ST 0 TX 76201 31 VENDOR NO. DEUVERY QUOTED FOB TRA47750 ul 31 91 DESTINATION TERMS 11 2000 EA VENDOR CA7vI N / A CITY 196882 MFG MANE 4e400.000 2 PHASE TRANSYT CONTROLLER 9 CABINET 808tl0.00 12 80000 EA VENDOR CAT 8 N / A MFG NAME CITY 19882 30f00.000 250800.0c 4 PHASE TRANSYT CONTROLLER 6 CABINET 33 1e000 EA VENDOR CAT•'# N / A MFG NAME CITY i 96882 3079846000 30748.OC e PHASE TRANSYT CONTROLLER 6 CABINET 04 90000 EA VEND_0 AT• N / A MFG NAME 1 S PHASE9TRAN t/ SYT CONTROLLER t CABINET ds798.000 110896.Ot~ OS 49000 EA VENDOR CAT* N N / A MFG NAME BIPHASE 9TRANSYT CONTROLLER i CABINET 6,i98.Onp 23s192.Ot +I I 2J0 020 OI2S 0001 8336 PAGE 70 AL 740854.Ox~ 02 40: 09494 GRAND TOTAL 74*886.Ott 03 100 020 0012 8326 110696000 I 231 020 012H 0001 8336 230192.00 NOOK INSTRt1CIMS: 0 Terms - Net 30 (Lk e" Oth"We IPxdeaa I Sell ortq I Ir"ief adth dwllcate copy. 1. Shipq np kulruc! ona F OS OeStinalton all to -Accounts Payable b. No federal or State sales tax shah be Mkl~d lM ku arww w sncdeei 215 E. McKinney St. In orOs billed, Mnln• TX 7E?~l V E N Dt1 R Porch asi np Oivls bn A rlmg, TPAF/IC EHCINEE7tlNQ NNTMX& IQ- City of Denton i Traffic Operations Municipal Bldg, *QUOTATION Dentor (CORR~ BOi TED COPT) Atn: Jerry y Clark, , P.E j , Director of Engineering Transportation Ref: Transyt System Quotatin Dated: 01/23/91 Traffic Engineering and Controls, Inc. is pleased to provide the follow- ing quotation on Transyt System Controllere: The Transyt system presently in place in the City of Denton, by means of designs, technology, software and copyrights is a sole source item. As a point of reference this quotation reflects prices originally quoted 06/22789. The following reflects breakdown: Transyt 1880EL Controller Assembly (per City of Denton Speo.) 2 Phase - $4400.00ea. 4 Phase - $5100,00ea. 8 Phase - $3798.00sa.' Y..-Yr These above prices apply as follows in 3 delivery shipment schedule (1) Delivered 30-45 ARO : FOB DESTINATION : Reference:(TL8 GRAD Qty: Two - 2 Phase Controllers - $4400.00ea. Five - 4 Phase Controllers - $5100.00ea. TOTAL:$40,098.00 ---r-One---=-8 Phase Controllers - $5798.00ea. .Y----- (2) Delivered per City of Denton release date to be specified: Qtys Two - 8 Phase - $5798.00#&. $11,596.00 TOTAL FOB DESTINATION M -----w-- 0 ) Delivered per City of Denton release date to be specified: Qty: Four - 8 Phase Controllers - $5798.00#&. TOTAL: $23,192,00 Reference: (TMP GRANT) FOB DESTINATION Y All above release must occur within year of 1991 and Transyt Corp. notifies that all future orders must be in quanities of (10)minimu2. Transyt Corp. also to hold prioing,no longer offer 2 or 4 Phase. Traffic Engineering & Controls, Tna. & Transyt Corp will present City of Denton with a contract price guarantee for (o") year from date of this quotation renewable by agreement of both parties with provisi0 Coat of Living Increase). 1~j~j Kevin B W- 4 r-' r f I e CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DEN TON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 MEMORANDUM DATE: January 25, 1991 TO: Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent FROM., Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering & Transportation Gi. SUBJECT: Transyt Controller Purchase i have enclosed the final pricing data from Traffic Engineering and Controls, Incorporated for the Transyt Controllers to be purchased in 1991. The projects that these will be used on include the following: Phase I: TLS Grant - Bell Avenue a) 8 Controllers Phase II: Controller Upgrades - McKinney At kudra and Windsor/Sherman a) 2 Controllers Phase III: TM Grant - Eagle Drive a) 4 Controllers C The controllers will be purchased in phases as described above. Phases 1 and 3 will be reimbursed by the State .75% of unit cost. Budget impact will be negligible since we will also be reimbursed for labor and m'nor equipment. These should cover most of the cost of r it 258 participation in the controllers. i Transyt equipment is necessa. to insure compatibility with our 'Transyt Closed Loop System'. This also minimizes the part storage and repair technique expertise necessary in repair work, j I We have also completed recent contact with other cities, our costs are lower in comparison to others in that most controllers range from $6,000 - $7,000 except the one or two bargain brands with limited features. Please process the 1991 controller order to Council for consideration on February 5, 1991. C' r 09 6 t4` 1 r \1 1 CiTYof DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 MEMORANDUM cr. DATE: January 25, 1991 TO., Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent FROM: Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering & Transportation SUBJECT: TLS and TM Grants .I The City of Denton has recently received 2 grants from the State of Texas for traffic control equipment upgrades. the exact dollar values the State is rovid I will including city participation. Our TLS Providing not to be spent to upgrade the equipment on aBell sAv nue. The~3M ,11 build asturn l~ane3for Car oll at University ,t on Eagle Drive and Each grant has provisions for 75% reimbursement with 25% city participation. The grants are placed on a tight 6 month time line at which the monies are forfeited if not spent. Therefore, all transactions will occur in the 1990-91 Budget. Please encumber each phase of the order at the time of the order. We are working with accounting to set up accounts tied to each grant (as referenced in attached purchase request), This accounting method will keep us from being locked out of our budget appropriation for traffic signals, signs, and markings. Please keep in mind these are grant accounts and will be reimbursed after the purchase. e r y k ~-r¢1,,~-~^ 0991E i i ~JI t s 1 DATEtFEBRUARY y,1g91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT 1 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM; Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTi PURCHASE OPDER /11970 TO DACO INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $13,000.00. flE44tlME?tpATIQS~ We recommend purchase order 111970 to DACO Inc. In the amount of 413,000.00 be approved. 21MMAH: This purchase order is for the single source purchase of two remote terminal units (RTU) to supply telemetry communication from the Lewisville/Ray Roberts Hydro projects to the City of Dallas. The remote units used by the City of Denton are not compatible with Dallas remote. These new remotes will allow for teiemetered information concerning the rate of water flow to be relayed from the hydro plants to the Dallas pumping division at White Rock Control Center. The City of Denton will own these units and the City of Dallas will pay for telephone lines and maintenance of the units. Due to striot requirements for compatibility with the Dallas system this product is a single source item. j These sole source high tech RTU+s are protected by design patents 1 and software copyrights exempting them from the bid process. Public Utility Board recommends approval. JASY,91.Q112i Purchase order #11970, DACO Inc. Quotation DAL-3626, Efl44EAM,4~_p&EABTtlEMT_QH_9flQSiPS_AEEflSTE~~ City of Denton, City of Dallas, Lewisville/Ray Roberts Hydro projects. FIS4AL_IMEAFT~ These units will be i Roberts revenue bonds. Aoot 1612-090-RB90eJR07-9235ewiaville/Ray 0612-080-8890-JL05-9235 Respectfully aubmitteds t /i4 z L arrell - City Manager Approved byt % Names=-TomTom D. Shaw,-C.P.M. Titlei Purchasing Agent T9/jh 113,DOC .y 4 t 11 I1J IJ I 1 CONFIRMING ORDER XX PURCHASE ORDER N0: PC 11470 (IF MARKED This mmlber must appear an an DO NOT DUPLICATE fnwkes, del"ry sks, cases. tire., Ifoxisss, packIris lrq 0Ap0 and bills. Date: 011 28 91 Page No. 01 Rea No: Bb No: 1 D 1DOR PURCHASINO Of VISION 190t-8 TEXAS STAEEr/DENTON. TEXAS 76201 e 817/383.7700 O1FW META0 817r26P00a2 FAX W13821692 I .C. BOX 154349 DELIVERY CCNFIRMATION ONLY CIS I )RE SS PDACC IFkVINGo TEXAS2 75015 ADDRESS UTILITY DEPARTMENT 901 8 TEXAS ST OENTONiTX 76201 JIM CRAt37FEE i VENDOR NO, DAC49000 DELNERYOtIOTED 01 31 91 FOB TERMS DESTINATION 01 6500eDD'J EA VENDOR CA20529 If / A MFG NAME 16000 6a50060r', REMOTE UNIT FOR CITY OFDALLAS RAY ROBERTS HYDROPROJECT C.• 02 6500.000 EA VENDOR CAT. # N / A MFG NAME 10000 60600801 CITY fl 20529 I REMOTE UNIT FOR CITY OF DALLAS LEWISVILLE HYDROPROJECT i i i ! 1 ~ I ~ I ~ i l ' PAGE TOTAL 1 13000060( GRAND TOTAL 1 13000060t C1 612 080 8890 999S 5233 60500400 02 612 080 RB40 9599 9235 60500600 I =NOOK WSTRLK TIONS: a Terms - Net 30 JVrAM a vAils 0o#&W I Send orlglnal liN l o with Urcale copy. e. Shipping Msirudlpns F08 Destlnanan prepold tunl0u oevr**# swewd) Oil to - Aeeounls Coysble 6, No federal or slate sales tax shall be Inckided 215 E, McKinney SL In prices Lilted, Purchasing Division ~,nl'I Tx 'IA~nI VP~mna , 1 I I i . 1 CAVE ALLEATCO, of RALLASaIMC; ►00. ewi.ll/ap kfft Tun leo% AM 180e VAX Z• eu wAnMW $AtwN . . 10, 1991 Quotation DAL-3626 Revision 1 City of DontoO 901 A Tdxaa street Denton, TX 76201 Attentions :Sr. Jao C1,orri 3ubjoott Q91 RTU for City of On11c3 f Reforonaei Our tol6004 of 1/10/91 Door Ne. Cherris 1 114 ere p1064ed to prOpnao tha foliowirntl for your consideration. € 14 2 oa 081 4090 RTUIs aaah 004siaLing or the followinele 16 - status j { 0 - Analog (4-20 iaA) 4 - Control (diijital) f j 1- Qa60 oabinitt - 240 11 x 200 W x 100 0 1 1 - Heater and t4ornorteet i - Dattary backup f - Set doaueaantation a aourco codes f 661700.00/RTU ~ Hotol Abovo wrUto to 09MILLuniontu with Dallar, QUICS IV at 4hile nook, ll' DBLIVLHYs 16 weeks ARID rose Denton, T'( THP11..1 flat 60 days - A eerviue ohart;o of 1-112$ pop t: ' oesargsd to 611 invoiuas waluh are 30day& PIestadue.Mill bs- J 'Ju apyrooiate thin opportunity to Uu of oorvioo to '6+111 LOU L wits your approval. Pricae you and baps tho above days froN '°uL'' toil I,;,is Quotation. An orderdraiLbova ar good tar thirty uulLin jefrom thin Quotation Id oulef 'I• d11-0tul1 toe DACO P. 0. Uox 194349, 11vin+,;, w'A't.v 77015. 1: you ohoula have any quoationa ur if wu eLtl bt of f.Jrthsr n.r•o3ur to any way, 111oue,a do not 110e1teets to call on ua. 4 Hsat ro;aruo, f DACO/D 'vm L1 T C . OF DALLAS1.1R0. e 1 ' r ya. itQ w:we:~ I s s-mrrc~ s 2 14 cre 4630 DLS WTI OTL 62 s I (,NV NMI . dllw ToM n6T • (9 O»3:46 January 30, 1491 R. 8. Nelson Executive Direct F. Department of Uti it as city Of Denton ~ 415 Esat Mctinne atat Denton, Texas 711 101t Dear Bob: Thank you to roviding your letter of agreement regarding the installation, er 19 and maintenance of the remote telenatry wilts 11TU18) to be na allad at Denton's Lewisville Like and'ltay Roberts Like hydtoalsetrie oar pplants. The tartar appears to be an intarlocal sgreaeent betwa D as and Denton which will require that it be approved t by Dallas City Co ail. The time required to take this action is approaisately t nthe, not including attorney review and approval time. it is approach is necessary, we may went to consider restructuring t tter as an exhibit to the existing agreements for'tho hydroelectric r lants. Dallas Water U iii ias does not object to the City of Denton retaining ownership of t U's which Denton will provide at the two hydroelectric power plants. A De ton's and Dallas' personnel have discussed: •Daoton will ur hasa, own, and install the "U's and the associgted -wiring runs it ut asking connections at the BTU's. •061166 will k the wiring connections it the RTU's and do the work neesse Y start operation of the RTU's. -Denton will ro ide installation of telaphona service to the RTU'a and Dallas % 11 pay monthly service charges. -Dallas will pe to and naintain the RTU's. -Should reps t of the RTU's be necessary at some time in the future, Dallas ill replace them and return the original RTU's purchased b Dorton to Denton. i ~ A dN LOIN nM 11 11e'LMdlh WAIN dx&AInn And AiOFMOn WORN water tAIIA 1iM ftM k+AlrM d i 1 { k r F 1 = 211 6T0~4036 DLS WTR UTL 63 ~ I 1 V i specific detail r garding the RTV epecifieationo and telephone service have been raaoly twin Dallas and Denton peraonnal. If you want t pu cue the interioeal agreement, please let Me know ao w can detaraine t at way to proceed, Please call no or Phil Boyd if yoo hav# any Qusatio . Sincerely,: v Matelyn Harp Aeeietant Direct r c: W. David Ry rn I f a i 1 J r~ 1 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: No parking on the east side of South Bonnie Brae RECOMMENDATION: Approval SUMMARY: The complaint is that this section of street experiences enormous congestion during football games and other festivities in and around Fouts Field. I BACKGROUND: The request was originated by the neighborhood south of Willowwood. The street is narrow and barely wide enough for two-car passage. when vehicles are parked, two-way travel is difficult to maintain. Should an emergency situation occur in the area, this will pose a great problem'for emergency vehicles. The University of North Texas is the sole owner of the property adjacent to the subject area. Mr. Ray McFarlane, Director of Physical Plant at UNT has been contacted and has given approval on October 23, 1990. i PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED: The neighborhood south of Willowwood, emergency vehicles, and general public. FISCAL IMPACT: Engineering and Transportation Division will install a minimum s of four signs - total cost about $200.00, Denton Police i Department will enforce ordinance. ' J 0773E/35 ~I i t 7, CTSSC MINUTES November 5, 1990 page 2 1 ITEM 03 REQUEST FOR NO PARKING ON SOUTH BONNIE BRAE STREETi Iwuchukwu presented the request. He said the request was originated by the neighborhood south of Willowwood. The complaint is that this section of street experiences enormous congestion during football games and other festivities in and around Fouts Field. The street is narrow and barely wide enough for two-car passage. When vehicles are parked, two-way travel is difficult to maintain. Should an emergency situation occur is the area, this will pose a great problem for emergency vehicles. The University of North Texas is the sole owner of the property adjacent to the subject area. Mrs Ray McFarlane, Director of Physical Plant at UK has been contacted and has given approval on October 239 1990. Cott asked what would happen with displaced parking. Iwuchukwu said Liberty Christian School has plenty of parking space within their premises. Parking is not prohibited on majority of the streets around Fouts Field. Chadwick asked if staff had heard from Liberty Christian Schools about this proposal. Iwuchukwu said the City Code of Ordinances +J only requires that adjacent property owners be contacted. Chadwick reiterated that staff was only talking about the east side. iwuchukwu said that was correct. Liberty Christian is on the west side. i Chadwick asked Captain Dotson how it would be enforced. He said the j problem only exists during the 4th of July when people park there to watch the fireworks. The beet enforcement would be a "tow away" k zones j Amador said the University of North Texas has no problem with the no parking proposal. STAFF RECOMMENDEDP Staff recommended approval for "no parking" on the east side of S. Bonnie Brae Street from FM 1515 to Willowwood. COMMISSIONERSI Erwin made a motion to accept staff recommendation with the addition of "tow away" zone at owner's expenses Amador seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. 0924E R' I I ~ t y gl ~ r.~/ ! r FM 1515 DD Q ~ oaD~ I Boa o00 r t m WrYof DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE{817) 680.8307 Olllce of fho Ofy Manayar e M E M O R A N D U M TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager t' DATE: February 1, 1991 SUBJECT: Parking on South Bonnie Brae There was some question whether Liberty Christian had been notified of the removal of parking. As mentioned, we normally t. do not notify anyone except adjacent property owners. However, it is my understanding that there was some concerns raised by the school and we've had at least two contacts made with E Liberty Christian about the parking on the east side of South Bonnie Brae or across the street from the school. It is my understanding that Liberty Christian does not have any problem + with the removal of parking. Also, it is my understanding that I Jane Marshall has been contacted and they concur with the removal also. If there are any other questions, please contact no at your convenience. Rick Svehla l Deputy City Manager RS:cb 5229H 1 ~ ~i• IMV..~ • ~I %bbso ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF VEHICLES ON THE EAST SIDE OF SOUTH BONNIE BRAE STREET, FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH FM 1515 TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH WILLOWWOOD ' STREET! PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. C_. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS; SECTION I. When signs are erected giving notice thereof, no person shall park a vehicle at anytime upon the following street or portion thereof, in the City of Denton, to-wits The east side of South Bonnie Brae Street, from its inter- section with FM 1515 to its intersection with Willowwood Street. SECTION I;. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sen- tence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION III. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the require- ments thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00). Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be punished within the limits above. SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective four- teen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official news- paper for the city of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. i PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1991. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR i ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY C' BYs APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY eye e, i ~ E i <t ~ } w 1 ' DATE: 02/05/91 1 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT # E TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell/ City Manager SUBJECT: ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 BY ADDING ARTICLE VI FOR CREATION OF DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDON: The Main Street Task Force and Central Business Dictrlct Association recommend approval, SUMMARY: Due to the growth of the Main street program, the task force feels this organizatonal change needs to be made in order to facilitate the downtown management process and strengthen the relationship with the private sector. sa. BAC-__ KGROUND: j The Main street Task Forcer appointed by Council in May, 19898 feels that Structural changes in the organization are necessary to meet } the needs of this changing and growing program, It is felt a smaller, more manageable grout' can more effectively direct the j program. Also, more representation in an ex-officio capacity from } the Denton Central Business District Association would strengthen f the public/private partnership. To ensure continued management of downtown area, the task force would like to be structured as to a standing advisory board of the city. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: N/A E FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Respectt y su itt City Manager 1IN4n d by: Lloyd Harrell s Bilea, Me ger Street Program App oved: i ank H, Robb not AICP Executive Director Planning and Development I 2S40x j r j II - ~I diem ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTONi AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY t'F DENTON BY ADDING ARTICLE VI: PROVIDING FOR THE CREATION OF A DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD: PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF POWERS AND DUTIES OF c-. TH': ADVISORY BOARD: PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE! AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION t. That Chapter 2 of the Code of ordinances of the City of Denton is hereby amended by adding a new article thereto, which article shall be and read as follows Article VI. Downtown Development Soo* 2-75. Downtown Development Advisory Board. The Denton Downtown Development Advisory Board is hereby established. The Board shall consist of eleven (11) members, eleven of whom shall be appointed by the City Council and two (2) ex- officio members to be nominated by the Central Business District Association and appointed by the City Council. Members shall be appointed to serve two (2) year terms, commencing'July 1 of the year appointed, provided that six (6) members shall be appointed to serve each odd-numbered year and five (6) members each even- numbered year. of the initial members appoiinted, six members shall I be appointed to serve a term to expire June 30, 1993 and five members shall be appointed to serve a term to expire June 30, 1992. Members shall serve until their successors are appointed and qualified. The Board shall elect a chair from among its members who shall serve for one (1) year or until his successor is elected. The Board shall serve without pay and shall adopt such rules as may be necessary for the rt7ulation of its business and affairs. Sea. 2-7is Duties and runctions. The Downtown Development Advisory Board shall serve in an advisory capacity to the City Council and shall make recommenda- tions to the amity Counoil and other appointed boards or commissions regarding i►sues and ordinances affecting the organization, promotion, appearance, revitalization and economic development of the downtown area and the central business district. The Board may establish such committees as necessary to carry out the purpose of the Advisory Board. Seas 2-77 through 2-79s Reserved. i i r N pts~ J SRCTION II. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in force when the provisions of this ordinance become effective which are inconsistent or in conflict with the terms or provisions contained in this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of any such conflict. SEMION 111. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1991. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR i ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: I r APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMI DEBRA A♦ DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY ~Y BY I L All PAGE 2 i S t L,o 100 West Oak i Q D Suite 204 MAIN STREET Denton, TX 76201 D E N T O N (817) 566-8529 MAIN STREET TASK FORCE I Active Members ~ 3 Kathleen Gigl j Fred Patterson Bob Woodin Herbert Holl Don Davis k Don Hill 3 ?tike Bates Bill Thomas Rahna Raney Jeanne Ford Floyd Hensley j A , r R d MAI CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 1 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Ordinance authorizing an exchange of land between the City of Denton and Rayzor Investments RECOMMENDATION. Approval C5; SUMMARY: As stated in the attached memo from Bob Tickner, this property exchange will enable better use of the parka land for expansion of the recreation facilities. BACKGROUNDS When the original boundary line was established, a gore was created along the west line of the City tract. This property is now used as part of the North Lakes Park. This boundary realignment will allow for additional park facilities to adjacent constructed with further development of the park. The I property owner (Rayzor Investments) is agreeable to exchange # the land as proposed. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED: The Parks and Recreation Department FISCAL IMPAM None 1 1 0773E V ' I y Ay • ClNIV~ 1 CITY of DENTON / 215 E. McKinney ! Denton, Texas 76201 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Planning and Zoning Commission PROM: Bob Ticknor, Superintendent of Parks DATES September 17, 1990 SUBJECT: North Lakes Park Property Line Adjustments and Land Exchanges As part of the 1986 Athletic Bond Iasue Project, the Parks and Recreation Department has developed a Master Plan for North Lakes Perks During this planning project, we have determined the beat locations for the many different recreational facilities to be constructed in the park. The most immediate 1 facilities to be built include a lour-field softball complex and a five-field ! 1 soccer area. Our analysis determined the best location for the softball fields was adjacent to the existing two fields. Pot soma unknown reason, when the property was acquired for a flood control f project and park, a very irregular boundary line was left on the watt side. A triangular shaped line projects toward the east near the existing two ballfieldes This restricts the best placement of the now proposed softball complex. Through moms assessment of all the property lines with adjacent owners# it was {f noted that the Raysor family was the primary owner in most locations. With the Raysor family, we agreed to consider some line changes that could benefit both the City and the Roycor family for future development. The following land exchanges and property line adjustments are proposed! 1) on the southeast corner of the park near the intermection of Windsor and Hinklet a .26 acre strip aligning to the Windsor Street right-of-way will be transferred to the Raysors• 2) on the west side of the park, the property line will be 1 straightened to a north-south alignment. This will provide a .99 acre narrow strip and a 127 acre triangle to be transferred to the 1 Raysors. i i w r-- wr .Mlltl~ 7? On the west side of the park, the City will receive a 2.58 acre ^ triangle with the establishment of new north-south property line. i~ This overall land exchange equals to a .06 acre net gain for the City. Also in the agreement is the provision of an access easement for a future street to the park from Bonnie Brae. AS the park is developed, this will relieve traffic from Windsor. y Your recommendation to requested so we may proceed with approvals from the 1 Texas Parka and Wildlife Department who administer federal park grants. Since we have used federal funds to develop this park, the city has agreed to use the land as outdoor recreation in perpetuity. Any changes or land conversions must be approved to maintain an equal amount of land and the federal investment. The next Step will require City Council approval. This exchange does not involve any financial considerations, The Parks and Recreation Board has reviewed and approved this proposal and the Master Plan for the park. G: it is our pleasure to present this request to you as well as show you the North Lakes Park Master Plan. We thank you for your time and consideration. j i Robert X. ickner PARXBI03 j j k i j i tr , P$2 Minutes September 26. 1990 Page 8 Mr, Glasscock noted that the proposed standards are minimums a.d a builder always has the option to do more, Staff has examined the proposed standards. Mr. Holt agreed that a minimum standard is needed but the ultimate decision should be left to the owner. He is in favor of the proposed changes, Mr. Engelbrecht moved to recommend approval of the amendment for parking lot surface standards. Seconded by Mr. Kammen and unanimously carried (5.0). VI, Consider North Lakes Park property line adjustment and land exchanges. Mr. Tickner spoke to the Commission about :nopportunity to solve a problem for the citizens of Denton and to help out a private concern as well. The City was appoached by representatives of the Rayzor family at one time to see if the City would have any real use or interest in a portion of property in the southeast corner of North Lakes Park, at the corner of Hinkle and Windsor. It is a strip that the City r will not be able to use recreationally. We are mowing it. It would probably be better to work something out with the Rayzor family to align it closer to the normal right-of-way line. At the same time, the Park's Master Plan was being prepared. The western boundary is very jagged. The Rayzor family also owns the land around the western boundary. So we approached them with a land exchange proposal to solve all of our problems. The result is a proposal to straighten the western property line and balance things out. The triangular piece of property jutting into the park was causing planning problems. They did not think they would have a use for the property either. The exchange will be almost even. The Parks Board has approved the exchange, Approval of Texas Parks and Wildlife is currently being sought. This exchange will benefit the park and the Rayzor family. The family also seems willing to grant an easement on the west side that will eventually be an access to that part of the park, Mr. Engelbrecht asked if there are any proposed Improvements on the property to be exchanged, Mr. Ticknor said no. Mr. Engelbrecht asked if the property is of similar value. Mr. Ticknor said yes. 1 I~ ~ + r+ p6E Minutes J September 26, 1990 Page 9 Ms. Morgan asked how many acres are in the park. A Mr, Tickner said 350. Mr, Glasscock moved to recommend approval of the proposed property line adjustment and land exchange. Seconded by Mr, Holt and unanimously carried (S-0). Mr. Tickner showed the HeCommiexssion for North Lakes Park. of one-half million dollars ave been filed with Texas Parks and Wildlife. The rsame amount is oved, construction will beginninmthey. If the grant is app summer. VII. Director's Report Mr. Robbins reported that the North Carroll Boulevard neighborhood had a meeting with the Planning staff. He explained that agendas for the Commission used to be posted outside of Customer Service. Now they are pposted in front of the Planning Department between doors. Che legal requirement for posting is 72 hours unless thelf ss an emergency. Emergencies are hard to justify enda will be ' sends a stamped, self-addressed envelope, an ag mailed to them. The staff contact for neighborhood groups varies according to the interest. In the Planning Department, it would be himself or Harry Perseud. if someone wants the City to build a sidewalk, the first step is to contact Jerry Clark, City Engineer. The next step would be to contact the City Manager's Office. e where h sidewalks if shtheta is a ould be built. committee that decides Mr. Robbins said no. Mr. Yost is putting together a sidewalk and pedestrian plan. Meeting adjourned at 7t2S p.m. 2406x J e 1 1 1 i Y~ 3 s n.rr' ~ 0 AnlAt p © 0 rr111. Pork Q04Rdgfi NtA. f i ~ " 1• ~ 1 F A 11 I. W Royylr I E ;'O II,7riA• Roy~or ~ . ~ ~ YYpck !Z I• ~I I~ YrnoF ~NaSS~ I f.N1A° (fNl~ 4.101 le I . I 0 „ I p is I. e I Worth Lakes Pack I. Ra~~or o.x y of . ~n1t4 J ~,,fla~/r %1~ ~ 3 -ISO j!LA:- At 18' Of *I cos°s I ~~i , I I 4 •rnde :1Jb1At ~1w I © 1 welt I W- 16 (fb flea r s c ~'ry vo RA`(ZA I i 1 i } s, 9 xr na ~1 t ray n r~ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AN EXCHANGE OF LAND BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND RAYZOR INVESTMENTS, LTD. AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN) AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Denton and Raynor Investments, Ltd. have agreed to exchange property along the boundaries of North Lakes Park; and WHEREAS, the three tracts owned by the City of Denton are of such shape and size that they cannot be used independently under the City's current zoning and subdivision ordinances) and WHEREAS, the fair market value of the tracts to be conveyed by the City are equal to or less than the fair market value of the tract to be received by the city, as shown by an appraisal obtained by the city; and WHEREAS, the exchange is in compliance with the provisions of Section 272.001 of the Local Government Code and Article V of Chapter 2 of the Code of Ordinances) NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS) SECTION I. That upon execution of delivery by Rayzor invest- ments, Ltd. of a general warranty deed conveying to the City of Denton the tract of land containing approximately 21581 acres, the Mayor is authorized to execute and deliver a quitclaim deed convey- j ing to Rayzor Investments, Inc, the three tracts of land containing approximately 26268 acres of land. SECTION III That this ordinance shell become effective immedi- ately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1991. BOB CASTLEBERRY* MAYOR ATTEST) I JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY) ' APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM; i DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY Ww- BY; I ~J 1 w r r 1. V f5 p#.yry \J~ \J r QUITCLAIM DEED Date: Granton THE CITY OF DENTON Grantor's Mailing Address: 215 Fast McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Denton County Grantee: RA17OR INVESTMENTS, LTD. • Grantee's mailing address: 1204 W. University Dr, 4th Floor Denton, Texas 76201.1771 Denton County Consideration: Ten and No/100 ($10.00) Dollars and Other Good and Valuable Consideration Property (Including any Improvements)t Tract I• ALL that certain lot, lact, or parcel of land lying and being situated In the N. If. Meisenheimer Survey A•811 and being part of a tract shown by deed to the City of Denton recorded In Volume 697, Page 207 Deed Records of Denton County, Texas and being more i particularly described as followst i COMMENCING at the northeast corner of said City of Denton tract; 3 THENCE south Mo 39' W east a distance of L039.1 ft.t THENCE north 890 00' $44 west a distance of 70.0 ft.$ THENCE south 00 48' M" west a distance tf 90,0 ft.1 THENCE south 710 26' 04' west a distance of 19.37 & to the Point of beginning; THENCE north 00 48' 04" east a distance o(14.43 R. to it point In the southerly right-of-way i of Windsor Drive In a curve to left, whose radius is 464.92 ft. and central angle 270 25' 19"1 I ) THENCE with said curve to the Lek In a southwesterly direction a distance of 231.98' to the k P.T. of sold curve; THENCE south 600 2S 46" teat a distance of 177.67 fa to a point where the southerly righl-of-way, line of Windsor Drive Intersects the southeasterly line of told City of Denton tract; THENCE north 710 26' 04" east with the southeasterly line of the City of Denton tract 395.82 h. to the Point of Beginning and containing 0.265 acres of land, I ~J 1 9 i ~,rnNea 1 ~ . Trycl ~ 1 ALL that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land lying and being situated In the N. 11. Meisenheimer Survey A410 and being part of a tract shown by deed to the City of nton, Texas recorded In Volume 697, Page 217 or the, Deed Records of Denton County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northwest corner of said City of Denton Iractl THENCE south 4a 03' 04' west a distance of 1269.0 R. to a point for a corner; THENCE south 590 56' S6' east a distance of 75.89 f1. to a point for a cornerl THENCE north to 03' IV east a distance of 1304.05 ft. to the Point of Beginning and containing 0.994 acres of land. r Tract III ALL that certain loq tract, or parcel of land lying and being situated In the N. If. i Meisenheimer Survey A•810 and being part of a tract shown by deed to the City of Denton, Texas recorded In Volume 697, Page 20 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas and also a part of Lot 1, Block One of the North tykes Fire Station Addition as recorded In Cabinet G, Page 330 of the Plat Records of Denton County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows; ! COMMENCING at the northwest corner of sold City of Denton tract; THENCE south to 03' 10" west a distance of 1846.39 R. to the Point of Beginningl f THENCE south 540 03' 04' west a distance of 475,77 It. to the most southerly northeast corner of said North Lakes Fire Station Addition; THENCE south No OY W east with the easterly extension of the north Ilna of North Lakes I Fire Station Addition a distance of 380.0 R. to a point for corner; THENCE north to 031 10" cast a distance of 292.18 ft. to the Point of Beginning and contalning 1,274 acres of land. Reservations from and Exceptions to Conveyance and Warranty: All easements and rights-of•way filed of record to the deed records of Denton County. I For the consideration Grantor qulictalms to Grantee all of Grentor's right, telly and Interest In and to the properly, to have and to hold It to Grantee, Grantee's Wes, execulors, administralon, uxrea.!ors, or assigns forever, Neither Grantor nor Gronlor's heirs, executors, adminlatrsloi% successors, or assigns shall have, claim, or demand any right or title to the property or any part of It. Wben the context requlrt% singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. PAGE 2 1 I 1 r~ 1 r i i THE CITY OF DENTON i By: BOB CASTLEVRRY, MAYOR STATE. OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON This Instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of _ 19_ by Bob Castleberry, Mayor or the City of Denton, Texas, a municipal corporation of the State of Texas, on behalf of said corporation. r~ 1 i Notary Public, State of Texas ~ I f i { ~ I AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO-. Raw Investments, Ltd. 1204 W. University Dr, 4th Floor Denton, Texas 76:91.1771 i i i PAGE 3 1 i r t r + WARRANTY DF.F.I) I)ete: ~~I Grantor: RAVZOR INVFSI'NIENTS, UTD. 1 Grantor's Dialling Address: DeOn on, Texast 7 201.177Alth 1 Moor y Denton County Grantee: TIIF Clly OF DEWON Grantee's malting address; 215 Fast McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 G Denton County Consideration: Ten and N(1100 ($10.oo) 1)ollars and other Good and Valuable Consideration property (including any lmprostments)a AI.I, that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land lying and being slinnied In the N. It. Tleisenheimer Suney A•811 Deitnn Comity, Texas and being part of a tract shmrn by deed to Jesse Neeion Raymr recorded In Volume 434, page 6$9 I)ted Records of Denton County, , Texas and being more pnrllcularly described as folloWs- CONINIFNCiNG at the northwest comer recorded in Volume 697, page 217 I)eedRecord' of Denton County Texas, lily of I)enlon TIIENCF, south to 03' to, west a distance of 1304.05 ft. to the point of Beginning) TOFNCF south $90 56,46o east a distance of 474.11 IL to a point for corner) TIIFNCF, south $40 03' 04" west it distance of 519.23 fl. to a point for corner{ IIF,NCF north to 03' 110" east a distance of 542.34' to the point of Beginning and T containing 2.31111 acres of land. nce and Warronlyt All easements and righh-of•way filed of Reservations from and Exceptions to Conveyance record in the deed records of Denton County. and Grantor, for the consideration and subject to the resetinsIran with all exceptions oar the rightt and warranty, grants, sells, and conveys to Grantee the properly, together odministrators, soccecsiort,nor w oss llna fore trio t hose ranlor d binhold d ( Grantor and + Grnnllor's heirs, executors, appurtenances thereto ay adminlsitators, and successors to warrant and forever defend all and singular the property to Granite and T~ i r Grantee's help, executors, administrators, successors, Bud assigns against every person whomsoever lnwrotly claiming oe to claim the some or any part Ihereof, except as to the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance and warranty. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns Include the plural RAYLOR R*MW IN1'F,STMF.NT,% LTD. RV f Titlez _ President The Rayzor Company, ( r' General Partner j 1 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON This Instrument was acknowledged before me on the)tItay of JAn Uaxy 194 by J. Newton Rayzor--af President of The Ravzor COmpanV. a Texas Corporation, Managing General Partner of sx.Rayzor InvestmentsLtdrotpo xdm,on behalf of said corporation. P° v't Gladys S. 1.ea;hernced ~j / Commisstn ExtMas L/ t~q • s yazC f January 18, 1991 No ary 1 biie, State of Texas i AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO- City of Denton t Office of the City Attorney j 215 E. McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 PAGE 2 f CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE(817) 688.8307 j office of the City Mensper f M E M O R A N D U M TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager GS FROM: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager DATE: January 24, 1991 SUBJECT: Trading of Land for Fire Station #6 and Proposed Site for the Library At their last meeting, the Council approved the zoning amendments for PD 16. You will recall the action amended the Plan Development #16 to allow for a fire station and library to i be built on the south end. It also allowed for a pad site for y t a retail type use at the corner of Teasley and Lillian Miller. With that zoning in place, we have negotiated with NCNB to trade our existing land at the corner of Teasley and Lillian Miller (approximately 1 acre) as well as the old curve i right-of-way of Farm to Market 2181, or Teasley Lane, approximately .9 acre, for 2.8 acres of land at the southern j end of PD 16. This will allow us to build the long awaited Station 06 as well as provide enough space to accommodate a site for the library and its future expansion on the 2.8 acres of ground. 3 The new site allows for better access for our emergency vehicles. It will eliminate some of the large turning movements that the fire equipment would have to make near the intersection. It will allow the intersection at Teasley and Lillian Miller to function with greater ease. Finally, it will provide enough space to build two facilities instead of one. Since the site fronts FM 2181, or Teasley Lane, we will also be able to eliminate street paving costs. (Teasley will be built through a State Highway project.) Also, because it is a joint facility, the infrastructure cost will be able to be shared and used for both facilities. This will enable the cost to be I lower to each separate bond account, and it will obviously reduce redundancy required. I I i VF ,.w T r'^ Fun~ Lloyd V. Harrell January 24, 1991 A Page 2 I have attached a drawing that shows the developments at the site. The drawing shows the construction costs for the library's part of the funding. Those include approximately 200 feet of water line, 250 feet of 8" sewer line, and 250 feet of sidewalk. These costs for improvements would be matched by the Fire Department. Those bonds will fund the screening fence. the drainage improvements, and the other half of the water line. Engineering has estimated the costs to be approximately the same. In addition, we are recommending the Council consider spending additional library funds to provide parking for the library when it is built. The staff feels that we can maximize our dollars by building this parking lot now rather C. than waiting two or three years and incurring additional inflationary costs. We have reviewed these items with the Library Board and with the 191 Committee. Both bodies recommend the above improvements to the site. Staff concurs with the recommendation of the 191 Committee and the Library Board to make this land trade. Incidentally, the Planning and Zoning commission reviewed this same idea approximately a year and a half ago and also concurred with the recommendation. As mentioned above, we would also concur with the Library Board and the 191 Committee in their recommendation to fund the infrastructure improvements mentioned. If the Council approves the trade and concurs with the Library Board and 191 Committee recommendation on infrastructure, we would take the recommendation for expenditure of the funds for the infrastructure back to Planning and Zoning at the final platting stages since these are CIP funds. Both recommending bodies and the staff are very excited about the trade and the construction of the two facilities. If Council approves, this would bring to a close approximately two years of negotiation and effort by the staff and NCNB to provide for our city's needs as well as the bank'e. If you or the Council has any further questions, I would be happy to try and answer them at your convenience. J RiQSve De puty City Manager RS:bw 5221M Attachments v 1 1 i i t ~ ~ 1 dY""'7AiA~ • 7 • W ~i~~M'w fv~drs library a Perkin'/Drive Acsw kV4j6 re e.ot aaf w d ` ~ i«rx ss, Fr.~TU R E sit arm SiOnf EX snt r L ~brorx Consh-x on CQ ri Fite SMfion ConsfrucfrnrJ cod Public Sidewo/k ir 3,000 Scrcenrngfence '¢ooo 8"3ewer Gins . r 7JSOO Oro;ls" focil;hes 10,600 6"Wolor Circe #5500 G"Wolsr Una 2,000 sub 7oto/ ,000 IG, eooo • Orrves $ Porkt~q Lof "G S o0 0 Tofe/ 081000 s ` a i DRAFT MINUTES SPECIAL CALLED MEETING DENTON LIBRARY BOARD JANUARY 17, 1991 Present: Ed Coomes, Jean Glasgow, Mary Jo Pickens, Ted Maines, Dorothy Adkins, Jean Schaake, Hugh Ayer, Betty McKean, Rick Svehla and and Joella Orr. Absenti Margret Chrisman. Betty McKean presented a map of the proposed development of the library site at Lillian Miller Parkway and Teasley Lane. Along with the map, a memorandum reminding the Board of the site selection criteria recommended by HBW, Inc., Library Consultants was included. Rick Svehla reviewed the background of the land acquisition from NCNB (formerly Republic National Bank) and suggested a division of the responsibility for development between the Library and City Fire Department. Betty McKean asked the Board to approve the site and t, authorize staff to obtain an architectural drawing in order to better solicit additional funds for the construction of the building. The map included preliminary estimated Phase I library construction costs for drives and parking lot, public sidewalk, 8' sewer line, and b" water line totalling $61,000. The motion was made by Ted Maines that the Library recommend to the City Council that these plans be accepted and the Library pay from available bond money its share of the costs as presented. The motion was seconded by Mary Jo Pickens, The motion passed unanimously. The map, selection criteria, and site preparation costs are attached. Joella Orr presented a memorandum of suggested library expenditures in the areas of new site development and improvements on the present Library, Discussion was held with Betty McKean regarding the legal implications of delaying expenditure of the bond money beyond two years of the date of sale. The Board was assured that an expanded expenditure schedule was acceptable to the City Finance Director and the City Attorney, Betty McKean explained the procedure for formal recommendation of these expenditures upon final review and approval of the Board, The motion was made by Jean Schaake to table the item recommending commissioning a conceptual drawing/model of the future building until more cost information was available. The motion was seconded by Ted Haines, The motion passed unanimously. l' 1 Minutes Special Called Meeting January 17, 1991 Page -2- The Board discussed the following library expenditures , (see attached), Ted Maines moved that we recommend approval to the City Council on$ Item 4 - Moving the Ramp, not to exceed $7,000 Item S - Redesign of entryway, not to exceed $4,950. Jean Schaake seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. On item 6, new carpet, Ted Maines moved and Mary Jo Pickens seconded that we recommend to the City Council the expenditure of no more than $82,200 for new carpet. The motion passed unanimously. Ted Maines moved that item 7, furniture for present library, be rejected. The motion died for lack of second. Jean Schaake moved that item 7 be accepted. Dorothy Adkins seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously, The minutes of the November 6, 1990 Regular Meeting were approved with editorial changes, I Ed Coomes reported that Linnie McAdams was elected as a Delegate from Texas Library Association and Texas State Library to the White House Conference on Library and Information. Arrangements were discussed for members, Mary Jo Pickens and Jean Glasgow, to attend Texas Legislative Day in Austin on February 13, 1991, With no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9100 p.m, Attachment H18NNjs r ~ HBW1 INC. A Site 9lbelife Rows T.3 $e_eotion Criteria. /J,;_W$[tg.Cpp$oity The site should be large enough to provide a sufficient square or rectangular library "footprint," the required parking, future expansion and necessary allowances for setback, zoning requirements and suitable landscaping. $elecgtion Criteria.#2,Z__.Aocessibi.iJty The site should be easily accessible by automobile and within walking distance of some users/potential users. cl However, pedestrian access will always be secondary, especially in the southwest. Parking is a key element of automobile accessibility. fthpPAIQn -Criteria The quality of the existing neighborhood surrounding the library needs to complement rather than detract from the library. The library site should be located In an area with a strong positive Identity and image. Placing the library, at the site should also be compatible with surrounding land uses, both existing and proposed. Ce1eu.4ion.Critarla.44 __.Yt ibil ty A prominent location Is required to attract a large number of people to the library. A highly visible site along a major street with easy accessibility Is ideal. If the site for surrounding sites) involves other buildings, the library should be able to be oriented in the Portion of the site with highest visibility. Sel~otJ_un..~rlSar.ie_.~.5;__Ce~Q[r~Ph.1.o. Ea~tpirne A library should be located where people can easily reach It and conduct other aotivitiea during the same trip. This means a place where people naturally converge. The site should be where the largest percentage of all people to be served will have access to the library frequently In the normal pursuit of their activities. $Aleatloq Crite,ri4./61,,,,,,,Neighborlfood_Cq*DatJbjljty Will the library be a good neighbor? Is the nelihbnrhoud fully developed? If so, how will the library "fit?" If there is development in the future, will it l3e compatible with Lhp mission and goals of the library? i I ~•-T --rte- ~ j--..~+ e 1 R:YI✓W~ yS + HBWr INC. A Site hinun keow 1.4 $elVgtlort Criteria., t7, 4egaA.."4LtLte1rp The exlHtence of easements or other restrictions can serve to minimize the buildable area of a site. A site owned by seier.al hrrsons/entlties can be difficult to acquire. Zanir,a restrictions can hamper development, including harking and/or entrance/egress to/from the site..; 9elect.Ion, Crl,terla,.#H:,,__Ut[ltieq._A.vr,}leb4 lty To avoid extra costs, the presence of electrical, water, gas, Hewer and other services should be in place--now or by the timF volistruction is scheduled to start. Seleo.t,ion l7rtt,eria t9; . .Phyuiugraphy The suitability of the soil, the topography of the site and orientation are considerations, Orientation considerations include the avoidance of west sun on the booker, or north rnt.rances which offer little winter sunlight r' and exposure to the cold northern winds. Tlo-Hrenkor,.Crii,erin:, _9i,te_-Nc~LnfPd_Qyta If gevernl sites are ranked equally, or nearly so, in all of the criteria, then site-related costs should serve as a "tie-breaker" to finalize Lhe selection of a library site. Site-related costs should be compared on the basis of all of the following factors: 1. Any acquisition costa. 2. Demolition costs of any existing facilities on the Hite. a. Relocation costs of any existing business or residents currently or. the site. 4. Any unusual site development ocaLs that May' occur, such as from a site with underground utilities arid/or writer. 5. Any nNLra construction costs that will occur due to such things as poor soli conditions, limitations of the site such as underground versus above grade parking, or site configuration resulting in a more expensive building solution. 6. The cost. of providing sufficient utility service to the site. i 41 1. HBW, INC, A site Selection Process 7.5 Ranking sites once the site selection factors have been determined, the next step in the process is to assign a point value to each of the nine 1 major factors. The sum total of the nine factors should be 10D. Within each major factor, points can be assigned to the sub-factors. The sub-factor points should equal the sum of the major factor point total. For Denton, the consultant recommends that Site Capacity, followed by Accessibility and Image/visual Quality are the three moat important factors, worth 20, 15 and 15 points respectively. Within Site Capacity, the most important sub-factor is Usable Site area--it is worth seven points. Therefore, if the usable site potential of Site A was considered to be ideal--neat perfect--it G would receive a ranking of six or seven (points). Conversely, if Site S was considered poor is usable site area potential, the points (rank) might be zero, one or two. Each factor and sub-factoc should have a point value. The site that receives the most points will be determined to be the beat site. If two or more sites are within eight to ten points of each other, then factor tlo, Cost Effectiveness, would be utilized. We cannot over-emphasize the importance of the site selection process, There is nothing, aside from the informational content within a library building, that will have a greater impact upon the overall success of a library than where It is located. Success of a i library building is measured by usage. The more a building is used, the .more cost effective it is. A good site will go a long way toward ensuring the operational success of any new library building that Denton will plan. i As indicated, these criteria apply to leased facilities, as well as those that would be designed and constructed as a library. I First Site for Denton We have previously recommended two large branch libraries for Dentone The first library should be placed in the southeast area of the city--see page 6.14 A ~ i i f MEMORANDUM TO: BETTY MCKEAN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL SERVICES 6 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FROM: JOELLA ORR, LIBRARY DIRECTOR SUBJ: LIBRARY EXPENDITURES DATEi January 17, 1991 R i ORIGINAL VOTER BOND ISSUE - $1,000,000 BOND SALE TO-DATE $ 400,000 1. To-Date Expenditures $38,724 + 2, Site Development not to exceed 81,000 3• Drawing, future building not to exceed 501000 4, Move ramp not to exceed 7,000 5, Entryway not to exceed 4050 d, Carpet not to exceed 82,200 7• Furnituree(see attached Equipment not to exceed 19,199 Total $283,073 J LLA ORR JO:}e 1977H r.* FURNITURE EXPENDITURES GAYLORD i 1) QLTDF Tambour Data File 82 Oak laminate $ 108.00 { b 1) QLTSM Storage Module 82.00 i 3) 100 Drawer Card Catalogue 83,131 9,993.00 e i 1) W.X 10L Lateral Wood Microform cabinet 2,316.00 Y r ~ 11 IBM-PC with Printer 14500.00 l l ~ ~ ;1 1) vertical File 2,200.00 r 1 1 919,199.00 n a' ! J 1966H I VF Rr I C.. 6 4 1 tlI w'~ 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT PROVIDING FOR THE EXCHANGE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY NCNB AND THE CITY; AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT FROM NCNB; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City, in accordance with the requirements of TEX. LOC. GOVIT CODE ANN. 5272.001 (Vernon 2988), has advertised that for the exchange of a certain tract of real property for another tract of real property located at the intersection of Lillian Miller Road and Teasley Lane; and WHEREAS, the City Manager having recommended to the City Council that the said exchange of land be approved) NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSs ~E~TION i, That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, approves the contract between the City and NCNB providing for the exchange of the real property described in the contract, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "All and incorporated by reference herein. $ECT 2 ii. That the City Council authorizes the Mayor and City manager to execute any and all documents necessary to consumma~e the purchase of real property in accordance with the contract. sECrI4N Iii, That the City Manager is authorized to accept an access eassment from NCNB, a copy of which is attached hereto. -13.Yiy. That this ordinance shall become effective immedi- ately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ~ 1991. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST! JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY, I X APPROVED AS Tp LEGAL FOR DEBRA A, DRAT LEGAL Ht v X11A , CITY ATTORNEY BY: i I j j f t r i I' i PAGE 2 1 I ` 1 t l y r I 1 CONTRACT FOR EXCHANGE OF REAL PROPERTY i This agreement in made on the day of by and between the City of Denton, Texas, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", and NCNB Texas National Bank, Trustee, (formerly First National Bank of Dallas), hereinafter re- ferred to as "Bank". It is agreed as followai i 1. NCNB agrees to convey to city, by general warranty deed, upon the terms and for the consideration set forth herein, all that certain real property, situated in the City of Denton, County of Denton, State of Texas and described as follows: All that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land situated in Denton County, Texas in the C. Poulallier survey, A-1006 and being part of a tract shown by deed to First National Bank, Trustee, recorded in Volume 7180 page 57 Deed Records of Denton County, Texas and being more particularly de- scribed as foilowst I ~ BEGINNING at the southeast corner of said First National Bank tracts THENCE south 88' 490 55" west with the south line of said First State bank tract 493.171 to its southwest cornert THENCE north 10 30' 05" west a distance of 250.0 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE 88' 491 55" eastta distance of 493.171 to a point in the westerly right-of-way line of F.M. 21811 THENCE south 11 101 05" east a distance of 250.09 to the Point of Beginning and containing 2.8304 acres of land. 2. city agrees to convey to NCNB0 by special warranty deed, upon the terms and for the consideration not forth herein, all that certain real property situated in the City of Denton, county of ; Denton, State of Texas and more particularly described as follows: All that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land lying and being situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the C. Poulallier Survey, Abstract 1 No. 1006 and being part of tract conveyed to the City of Denton by deed recorded in volume 2423, page 154 Real Property Records and also being part of two tracts conveyed to the State of Texas by deeds recorded in Volume 400, page 341 and Volume 400, Page 3340 Deed Records, Denton County, 1 ~.1 i' I Texas and being more particularly described as follows, BEGINNING at the northeast corner of the herein described i tract, said point lying in the south line Of P.M. 2181 (Teasley Lane), a public roadway with a right-of-way or 90.0 lest and the west line of Lillian Miller Parkway, a public roadway with a right-of-way of 90.0 !sett THENCE south 19 044-17" east-along the east boundary line of the herein described tract;-some being the west line of F.M. 2181 (Teasley Lane), passing at 285.79 feet the rl northeast line of the- old' curve portion of, F.M. 2181 (Teasley Lane) right-of-way and continuing a total distance of 575.43 feet to a point for corner, said point lying in the southwest right-of-way line of the old curve portion of FM. 2181 (Teasley Lane), same being the northeast boundary l recorded In ine of a tract conveyed to First National Bank by deed County, Texasol said 7point Page 7being d the c beginning sof oa curve to the left having a radius of 671.20 feet, a central angle of 660 331 $4" and a chord bearing and dlststnce of north 410 000 11" west, 736.66 feet! THENCE northeasterly along said curve and lines an arc f length of 779.78 feet to a point for a cornert THENCE north 700 12' 43" east along the south line of P.M. 2181 (Teasley Lane) a distance of 62.74 feet to a point for 1 cornert T HENCE south 890 44' 37" east continuing along the south line of north n t Mlinee of the oldncurve per o 126.36 feet the (Teasley Lane) right-of-way and continu ngoa total instance of 413.34 lost to the place of beginning and containing 1.962 acres of land, more or loss. 3. City shall deliver said deed to NCNB upon receipt oft (a) a general warranty deed from NCNB to City conveying the property described in paragraph 1) and (b) a sun of money equal to the estimated 1991 taxes on said property, prorated from January 1, 1991 through the date of delivery of the deed, at. a rate of $3.86 per day. this4agreements hion of all roert# real or all be delivered by each party rton the other upon exchange of deeds. CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY/ PAGE 2 i e" 1 5. Closing Date. The transactions shall be closed on or be. fora one hundred eighty (180) calendar days from the date of execu. i tion of this agreement by the city and NCNB, or at such other time as the parties may mutually agree, at the office of the escrow' agent or at such gther location as is mutually agreeable to the parties herein. 6, Integration:' This agreeaent constitutes the entire agree- ment betwoeft the parties and neither party relies upon any warrants or representation not contained herein. In winless whereof, the parties have executed this agreement on the date first above written. CITY I,Or DEMN " BY! 1 BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTESTI JENNIFER HALTERS, CITY, SECRETARY j BYs APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORK! DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCN, CITE' ATTORNEY i I I, I I BY! NCNB BYt TITLE CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY/ PAGE 3 THE STATE OF TEXAS I COUNTY OF DENTON I This instrument was acknowledged before me on the. day of 1991 by "t CaettNberry, Nayor-ot thet'City or Denton, Texas, a-Nunicipal•Corporation, on behalf, of said Municipal Corporation. . C: . NOTARY PVHLIC-I sTm, or TEXAS THE STATE OF TEXAS f COUNTY OF DENTON S This instrument was acknowledge,before as on the day of 1991 by NOTARY PUSLICO STATE OF TEXAS 1 nenbk I CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY/ PACE 4 1 J I r~ Y SPECIAL WARRANTY DEBD Date' Grantor: City of Denton, Texas Grantor's Mailing Address (including county)' Municipal Buifdinq 215 East McKinney 76201 Denton, Denton County, Texas C Grantee: NCNB Texas National Bank, Trustee Grantee's Mailing Address (including county): 901 Main Street, 20th Floor P. 0. Box 831500 Dallas, Dallas County, Texas 75293-1500 Consideration' Ten Dollars and No Cents ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration. i Property (including any improvements): All that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land lying and being situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the C. Poulallier Survey, Abstract No. 1006 and being part of tract conveyed to the City of Denton by dead recorded in Volume 2423, Page 154 Real Property Records and also being p two tracts conveyed to the State of Texas by deeds recorded in Volume and Volume 341 3341 County,4Texasa and being more particularly describ deasrfollows'on BEGINNING at the northeast corner of the herein described tract, said point lying in the south line of F.M. 2181 (Teasley Lane), a public roadway with a rig, a of-way roadway with a right ofswayiof of Lillian Miller Parkway, public 90.0 feet$ THENCE south 1' 04' 17" east along the east boundary line of the 181 tract, being the west line of POM. herein described the northeast line of2the (Teasley Lane)},, passing old curve portion of F.N. 2181 (Teasley Lane) right-of-way an continuing a total distance of 575.43 feet to a point for corner, PAGE 1 w. r G said point lying in the southwest right-of-way line of the old curve portion of F.M. 2181 (Teasley Lane), same being the northeast boundary line of a tract conveyed to First National Bank by deed recorded in Volume 7181 Page 57, Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, said point also being the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 671.20 _feet, a central angle of 664 33' 54" and a chord bearing and distance of north 41' 00' 11" west, 736.66 feet; THENCE northeasterly along said curve and lines an-are length of 179.78 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 70' 12' 43" east along the south line of F.N. 2181 Gc~ (Teasley Lane) a distance of 62.74 feet to a point for corner; THENCE south 890 44' 371' east continuing along the south line of F.H. 2181 (Teasley Lane) passing at 126.36 feet the northeast line of the old curve portion of F.M. 2181 (Teasley Lane) right-of-way and continuing a total distance of 413.54 feet to the place of beginning and containing 1.962 acres o' land, more or less. Reservations from and Exceptions to Conveyance and Warranty: Grantor, for the consideration and subject to the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance and warranty, grants, sells, and conveys to Grantee the property, together with all and singular the rights and appurtenances thereto in any wise belonging, to have and hold it to Grantee, Grantee's heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns forever. Grantor binds Grantor and Grantor's heirs, executors, administrators, and successors to warrant and forever defend all and singular the property to Grantee and Grantee's heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same or any part thereof, except as to the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance and warranty, when the claim is by, through, or under Grantor but not otherwise. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. CITY OF DENTON$ TEXAS BYa 808 CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR PAGE 2 r yi. , . r 6H~Y 1 THE STATE OF TEXAS $ G'+s? COUNTY OF DALLAS } This instrument was acknowledged before'no on this the day of , 1991 by Bob Castleberry, Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, a municipal corporation, on b.qkhalf of,said ' corporation. 1 Notary Publio, State of Texas I i 1 I~ I city PAGE 3 - a i THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON GRANT OF ACCESS EASEMENT } This Agreement, made the day of 19910 , is between NCNB Texas National Bank, Trustee, {formerly First National Bank in Dallas), "NCNB", and the City of Denton, Texas, a municipal corporation of the State of Texas, "City". cs. RECITALS 1. NCNB is the owner of a certain parcel of land situated in Denton County, Texas, being all of a tract shown by deed to First National Bank, Trustee, recorded in Volume 718, Page 57 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas. 2. NCNB and the City have executed a contract for the exchange of real property by which NCNB has agreed to convey to the City e certain parcel of land, consisting of 2.8304 acres of the tract described in the above paragraph, in exchange for the City's conveyance to NCNB of a certain parcel of land adjacent thereto and being part of a tract conveyed to the City by dead recorded in Volume 2423, Page 134, Real Property Records and also being part of two tracts conveyed to the State of Texas by deeds recorded in Volume 400, Page 341 and Page 334, Deed Records, Denton County Texas. so that the southerlyslineeofitheal t of NCNB'sdpr2 are opertyo is iideous n- tical and cc-extensive with the northerly line of the property that NCNB has agreed, for valuable consideration, to convey to the City. NCNB has agreed to grant a perpetual easement over a portion of its real property to provide for joint driveway access so that the City has adequate vehicular access to any improvements it may construct upon the property. GRANT In consideration of the payment of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknow- ledged, NCNB hereby grants the City of Denton a perpetual easement for vehicular access use on, over, and across that portion of the tract and parcel of real property owned by NCNB, as described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. This grant of easement shall run with the land and shall be binding on and shall inure to the benefit of the parties, their heirs, successors, or assiqns. R 1 NCNB TEXAS NATIONAL BANK, TRUSTEE 1 BYt TITLES THE STATE OF TEXAS f G~ COUNTY OF DALLAS ! This instrument was acknowledged before me on this the day of , 1991 by of NCNB Texas National Bank, a Texan corporation, on behalf cf said corporation. i Notary Public, State of Texas i f oche PACE 2 SX91BIT W All that cescertain lot, tract, Or parcel of land situated in Denton Yg, Texas in the C. psjulallier Survey A-1006 and being all of a tract shown by decJ to FIRST NATIONAL BANX, TRUSTEE recorded in Volume 718, page 57 Deed Records of Denton County Texas and part of a tract deeded to the State of Texas recorded in Volume 400, Page 334 Deed Records and also part of a tract shown by deed to the City of Denton, Texas recorded in Volume 2423, Page 154 Raal Property Records and being more particularly described as followsl COMMENCING at the northwest corner o. said First National Bank ecact and in the existing southerly right-of-May line of F,M, 21011 THENCE south 10 10' 05' east a distance of 334.0' to a point for a corner= THENCE south 240 23' 00' east a distance of 123.63' to 's point for a corners THENCE south 10 10' 030 east a distance of 224,271 to ne Point of Beginnings TUkNCE north 860 49' 55' east a. distance of 220,0' to a point for a corners THENCE north 10 10' 05' west a distance of 10.0' to a point for a corners THENC2 north 880 49' 35' east a distance of, 273.17' to a point on the west right-of-way of Lillian Millet Parkways 1 THENCE south 10 30' 05' east with the west right-of-way of Lillian Miller Parkway a distance of 40,0' to a point for a cornerl THENCE south 880 49' 559 west a distance of 493.17' to a point for a corner in the most easterly west line of said 'First National Bank' tract to a poiint for a cornets THENCE north 10 10' 059 west a distance of 304' to the Point of Beginnings anQ containing 0.402 acres of land. / 07072/70 I~ 1 J r' .iY.~ e~ } i Mwni aW 1 WARRANTY DRID Dates. Grantors NCNB Taxes National Bank, Trustee (formerly First .10 National Dank in Dallas) Grantor's Mailing Address (including county)s 901 Main Street, 20th Floor P. 0. Box 631300 Dallas, Dallas County, Texas 75283-1500 Grantees City of Denton, Texas Grantee's Mailing Address (including county)s municipal Building 215 East NoXinney Denton, Denton County, Texas 76201 Considerations Ten Dollars and No Cents ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration. Property (including any improvements)s All that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land situated in Denton County, Texas in the Co Poulallior Survey, A-1006 and being part of a tract shown by dead to First National Dank, Trustse, recorded in Volume 718, Page 57 Dead Records of Denton County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows BEGINNING at the southeast corner of said First National Bank tractr THENCE south 88' 49' 55" west with the south line of said First state Bank tract 493.17' to its southwest cornart THENCt north 1' 10' 05" west a distance of 260.0 feat to a point for a cornerr THENCE north 88' 49' SS" east a distance of 493.17' to a point in the westerly right-of-way line of F.N. 21811 PAGE 1 a 1 R JYay?~ j aFf{ l c 1 THENCE south 1' 10' 05" east a distance of 250.0' to the Point of Beginning and containing 2,8304 acres of land. i Reservations from and Exceptions to Conveyance and Warranty: Grantor, for the consideration and subject to the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance and warranty, grants, sells, and conveys to Grantee the property, together with all and singular the C' rights and appurtenances thereto in any wise belonging, to have and hold it to Grantees Grantee's heirs, executors, administrators, succeseore, or assigns forever. Grantor binds Grantor and Grantor's heirs, executors, administrators, and successors to warrant and forever defend all and singular the property to Grantee and Grantee's heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same or any part thereof. J When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural, NCNB TEXAS NATIONAL BANK, TRUSTEE j J I BYs Title: THE STATE OF TEX dl ! COUNTY OE OALLAB I This instrument was acknowledged before me on this the day of , 1991 by + of NCNB Texas National Bank, Trustee, a Texas corporation, on behalf of said corporation, Notary Public, State of Texas PAGE 2 I y r na ~ February 5, 19y1 7A. CITY COUNCIL ' AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager RE: CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING REVISED INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING POLICY f RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utilities Board and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended to the City Council on August 8, 1990 and January 16, 1991, respectively, approval of the attached Infrastructure Financing Policy. f SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: i In August, 1988, the Denton Development Plan recommended an economic growth incentive policy that promoted balanced 1 growth throughout the City. In response to this 1 recommendation, the Public Utilities Board and the Planning and Zoning Commission, in a joint meeting in February, 1989 approved the Guidelines for Fundin and Selecting r Development Plan Can a e water an Sewer L nes. ese GdiaeTi-ni prescribed --a prose- ss~y w c e Utility Department's Capital Improvements Plan would set aside up to $500,000 annually for water and sewer line construction to encourage economic growth in selected areas of the City. The Guidelines also prescribed rating and ranking criteria by``wBecF-such linen would be selected for J construction. In March, 19890 the Guidelines were approved by the City Council and in may, 1999, the Board considered funding of lines along Marsch Branch Road. The Board also expressed its concern that several of the Guidelines' top-ranked lines were in the southern part of FFiF-ICTty where economic growth was already sufficient, Therefore, the Board proposed a revised Guidelines policy that abandoned the rating and ranking criteria and provided construction funds only for lines serving industrial prospects. h i r i ~ . ,vpaKU.~ i The Board continued to express its concerns about the Guidelines' selection process. Consequently, the Candidate L nee Funding and selection process was put in abeyance until January, 1990. At that time, the Board proposed a revised Guidelines policy that would follow, rather than lead, economigrowth. The new policy would also do away with the rating and ranking of proposed lines and would make funds available only to construct lines that would serve industrial prospects which had committed to building facilities in Denton, At its April 3, 1990 meeting, the City Council expressed its concerns regarding the Board's fundamental revision of the Guidelines' policy. Therefore, it directed the Board and the Planning and Zoning Commission to further examine the proposed policy change. Consequently, these two bodies appointed two members each to jointly examine the revised policy, its implementation, and its integration with the City's overall economic development policy, Pursuant to the Council's instructions, a Committee was formed and met on May 31, 1990, and July 10 and 20, 1990, Following the Policy's revision per the Committee's request, the Committee recommended approval of the Policy ~r to the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Public Utility Board, Consequently, on July 23, 1990, the Policy was recommended by the Public Utility Board to the City j Council for approval and on August 8, 1990, the policy was recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission to the City Council for approval. Subsequent to the Board's and the Commission's recommendation, the policy was reviewed by the Legal Department which requested t;-at the policy be revised to incorporate language that would satisfy the requirements of the Texas Local Government Code, section 360,001, regarding the granting of public money to a private concern for the purpose of stimulating business and commercial activity. The policy was so revised to the satisfaction of the Legal I Department. At its January 160 1991 meeting, the Public Utilities Board recommended approval of the Policy to the City Council. 69590:2 1 FISCAL IMPACT: Both the current Guidelines and the Proposed Infrastructure F OlicY wou'17 annually make available up to wn Water Department CIP revenue funding and up to 250,000 in Wastewater Department CIP revenue funding. Funding from current revenue rather than from bonds would allow the department to use prior year allocations to fund future year projects and would increase total water system rates by 2.18% and total wastewater system rates by 3.42%. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED: City of Denton Utilities, Developers, Citizens of the Community, and new prospects. G: Respectfully submitted, U oy acre , anager city of Denton I 1 Pre, :.ed/A 1 pproved by: `!f i R.E. Vsop Executive D rector + Department of Utilities r A: Minutes PUB meeting of 1/16/91 Exhibits is Proposed Infrastructure Financing Policy after Legal Review II: Proposed Application for Infrastructure Assistance III: Proposed Infrastructure Financing/Economic Analysis Model IV: Minutes CC Meeting of April 3, 1990 i V: Minutes of the joint PUB and Planning and zoning of May 31, 1990, July 10, 1990, and agenda item for July 20, 1990. 6959U:3 1 I i t t VI: Minutes of PUB Meeting of July 23, 1990 VI10 Infrastructure policy as approved by Task Force, PUB, and Planning and zoning before Legal Review dated November 91 1990. VIII: Memorandum from City Attorney concerning review policy dated September 260 1990 and December 41 1990, IX: N/A c., X: Resolution XI: Candidate Line History f f 7 1 I i 1 6959Ua4 M r' 1 0 Excerpt MINUTES PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD January 16, 1991 5. CONSIDER INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING POLICY FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Ham pointed out changes iecommended by the Legal Department. Chew made a motion to adopt the policy as restructured. Second by Laney. All ayes, no nays,` motion carried. i Nelson advised that the Utility needs to re-consider the policy every year but is not required to put money in to the fund every year. For instance, to maintain this program in the 1991-92 budget will cause a 2.18% Increase in water rates and a 3.42% increase in wastewater rates if funded out of current revenues. i EXHIBITA2. . y_ t / ADMINISTRATIVE POtyr PROCEDURE 1 sue1ECT+ INFRASTRUCTI;,' TITLE INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING POLICY TIL TIE l ' EFFECTIVE GATE: 4C111 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICY I As expressed by the Denton Development Plan which was adopted by the Denton city Council on September .5, 1989, the major goals of the City's economic development policy are as follows: 1 to strengthen and diversify the urban economic base to create a wide range of employment opportunities - to expand the City's tax base ~y These goals will be accomplished principally through f~!! municipal efforts tot - attract basic industries to Denton - encourage basic industries already in Denton to expand locally. Phe•City of Denton Utilities Department policy is to suppart the City council's economic development goals and efforts by offering basic industries economic incentives, principle among which is the infrastructure Financing Program, This Program will lower a basic industry's total cost of locating to or expanding in Denton by allowing the V.ty to absorb part of the cost to construct the following types of water , and sewer mainst 10 - those water and sewer mains which are necessary C ' to serve the new or expanded basic industry ' I - those water and sewer mains which are required by the City's subdivision ordinance. Funding Policv During its annual review of the Utility Department's Capital Improvements Plan (CIP), the Public Utilities Hoard shall consider the allocation of up to $500,000 annually to fund the Infrastructure Financing Program. This allocation shall 1 consist of 5250,000 from the water Department's CIP and 5250,000 from the wastewater Department's CIP. 1 14 1 I s wF~ ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY / PROCEDURE Page z After such consideration, the Public Utilities Hoard shall make an Infrastructure Financing Program funding recommendation to the City council and the City Council shall determine the Program's conditions and funding level., That portion of each annual infrastructure Financing Program allocation which remains unobligated at the close of the fiscal year shall carry forward into the following fiscal \ year. However, the cumulative total of said unobligated a, annual allocations shall not exceed $2 million at any time. During its consideration of annual Infrastructure Financing Program funding, the Public Utilities Hoard shall evaluate s the Program's results and report that evaluation to the city G. Council. Selection Palicy ' (A) Infrastructure Financing shall be provided only to: 1) industrial prospects which have committed to building facilities in Denton 2) commercial/retail prospects which have committed to building facilities in Denton and which: ~ I a) sell a majority of their goods or services to f individuals or businesses outside of Denton, and/or b) manufacture goods for consumption in Denton which were previously manufactured outside of Denton ~ 3) corporate headquarters to building facilities noDenton which have committed i (B) All requests for Infrastructure Financing shall be y subject to the economic analysis detailed in this Policy. This analysis shall determine the subject utility line's construction benefits and cost over a five year period. 1 Infrastructure Financing may be available only if the benefits of the line's construction are equal to or exceed the cost of the line's consr.ruction. J 4 A ' { ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY / PROCEDURE Pa 3 (C) For purposes of the economic analysis: 1) Construction costs shall consist of lOC% of: i a) debt service associated with the subject utility i line's construction, and b) return on investment associated with the completed subject utility line. 2) Construction benefits shall consist of 25% of: a) revenue from ad valorum tax on prospect's local property, plant and equipment, b) revenue from sales tax on prospect's products and Ij services sold by the Denton facility, c) revenue from sales tax on local purchases by the Denton-resident labor force generated by f prospect's locating in Denton. J and 100% of: j d) revenue from sales tax on prospect's local purchase of its facility's construction materials, and e) revenue from that portion of the prospect's local consumption of Denton utilities that is contributed ! toward the return on investment. I ID) Funding of prospects shall be based on their dates of application] i.e., first come, first served. (E) Lines under consideration shall begin at an existing city main line and end at the closest technically feasible edge of the prospect's property. (F) The funding recommendation shall state funding limits I for the total project and its construction components as well as a time limit on the funding committment. R J r r~ r ~ It t ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY / PROCEDURE (G) Funds shall be disbursed to the prospect's designee only as follows: spect 1) upon presentation of a certificate of the prospect's Denton facility, or 2) in intermittmant payments as constructsubject utility line progresses. r 7the?/-! (H) Unobligated project funds shall be returned to the Infrastructure Financing Program account, ( p~.( Application Process J Step 1 Infrastructure Financing applications shall be available from the City's Economic Development Office. This office shall: provide prospect with economic assistance information f provide prospect with an application form and assist with its completion notify affected Departments of prospect's application coordinate the prospect's access to City Departments prepare an economic assistance package for the prospect Step 2 Completed applications shall be returned to the Economic , Development office which shall forward a copy of the prospect's completed application tos Planning Department - prepares land use analysis Utilities Department - prepares five year economic analysis, and technical and cost assessment of providing utility service to the prospect Step 3 The Public Utilities Board shall review the prospect's application, the technical issues of providing utility service to the prospect, a completed economic analysis and forward a recommendation for funding consideration to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Such recommendation may support the prospect's request for an exemption from those provisions of the sub-Division ordinance regarding the extension of utility lines. I --WW , 9 ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY / PROCEDURE Step a Page 5 i The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the prospect's application, a completed land use analysis, the economic analysis, and the Public Utilities Board's recommendation and forward both the Board's and its own recommendation to the City Council. n CLPOLICY.DOC ^ r I E a i 4 Y r • s APPLICATION FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ASSISTANCE Company Names Addrass: Tslephones(~) Contact Persons Titles Telephones Nature of Business: Years in Business! N of Facilities Nationally: N Of Facilities in Texas= Type of Facility: i Nearest Similar Facility: Are You Considering other Locations Besides Denton?: Yes No If Yes# whores MAJOC Factors that will influence your Recision! E PROPOSER FACILITY Location of Denton Sites i i Site Acreages Have You Ac If no, at what stage s acquiaition?s quired Site?! Yes No Square Footage of Facility; Number of Buildingss Type of Construction! Estimated Value of Constructions Anticipated Construction Starts Calopletion! Anticipated Opening Dates EXH I BIT r1) I w { f i Application for Infrastructure Assistance Page 2 EMPLOYMENT Initial Size of Labor Forces (All employees! Anticipated Payrolls s Eventual Size of Labor Force, (All employees ) Anticipated Payrolls S G Types Of Em►ployaes s (production, etc.) Number of Employees to be Recruited from Denton, payroll of Denton Recruits, s i UTILITIEs Facility's Hours Of Operation (M - F)s (sat fs Electric, (sun Anticipated Kilowatt Hours (O M), (If available, submit actual consumption from AMU"- facility) Anticipated Demand, (If not available, what Will a Your electric systems asign?) What Type Of Power Equipment will your (Inclw l HVAC size, etc.) Facility Utilize?s JJ 1 i water/wastewater, Anticipated water Constitmptions gallons per (If available, submit actual consumption from similar facility) Peak Water consumption, gallons per hour What portion Of your water consumption will be discharged as runo!£ (lawn sprinkler system, etc,)?s gallons per Anticipated Fire now Requirements?s Oalions Per Minute , 1 t. 1~ . G INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING/ECONOMIC ANALYSIS MODEL ( Page 1 1 XYZ, INC. , 2 February 5, 1991 3 4 Analysis Window: 5 years 5 6 Construction Cost: 592,000 t-- as estimated by Utility, 8 - 0 C": 9 Capital cost: Department Staff 10 11 Debt Service: $42,320 t--------------- see (1) Bond Amortisation 12 (principle plus 7.5% 13 annual interest) Schedule below 14 15 Return on Investment: 24,840 t-------_ ' 16 (6% annually) " - see 12) Return on Investment I7 Schedule below 18 Capital Cost Total: f 19 (Debt Service + Rol) $67,160 add lines 11 and 12 20 21 Benefits Total: 22 92443 from page 3 i 23 Net Benefit: $25,383 subtract line 18 from line 21 oexes:easess Financing to approved if net benefit equals or exceeds cost. 1-5 and 8% on Schedule IPrlnefpal onnt 2%ortizati eeara 6-201 (2) Return on Investment Schedule (Assumes 20 year life and 6% ROI) Begin Prinep Intrat Total Ending Year Balance Payant Payant Payant Balance Begin Annual Ending Year Balance Depreo. Balance RO1 $'a 1 $92,000 $1,810 $60900 $80740 $900160 -.i- 2 900160 1,840 6,762 8,602 88,320 $92'000 $4,600 $87,400 $51244 3 88,320 1,840 6,624 8,464 86,480 3 87,400 4,600 82,800 5,244 4 86,480 1,840 6,486 8,326 84,840 4 82,800 4,600 78,200 4,688 5 84,840 -1,840 61348 8,188 820800 5 78,200 4,600 73,600 4,892 73,600 4 ,600 69,000 4,416 $9,200 633,120 $42,320 Totals $23,000 $391,000 $24,840 ~x~r r e ~T ~ I ra I, s r< k 1118I9iSOCf081 1AIBCIICl1COIONIC 111tP91s 11016 Page I 1 Inefito 3 Ipplic11S't Cily'I gee let I Properly, City 'I City's Wool lote W111 let to 6 Plut 6 Ialutlol ht fu 11 Tax Levy lilt 6 Iatipett Otit lalgatin late Levy Ie101 Le►y I Tom r 1 I I I I I I 1 CJ I f I 1 1 4 1 I 1 ► ► f I ► 1 I 1 9 Property N Seveue: 13,190,0001 100 111,600 1 10,11 + 113,121 1 291: 11,111 1 1 years + 111,116 10 11 City's set let 12 lppliult'I City's 111101 lott Will let tax 13 litigated Sales ht 11 fu Levy o►er i 16 Iteaal still fat Levy 11101 Levy i tears 19 1 . i i i 1 16 Sales to Ieveaar I ► ► I I I 11 frog Prodecte/31111ces • 11,000400 1 11.01 = 140,000 1 161 + CO,000 t 1 years + 110,100 1s ' 19 10 hreett of Inber of Ill. Intel I1 Ipplicall's Wor Porte Labor force total Putot Salary D11t 22 Isttgated Ittlit it L1111 11 see late Ltbar force I Iradltreet 13 Labor Force Ieatol Deatoa 13 Was Iffected 1911, est. I1 I I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I6 ► ► ► I ► ► 16 frog hployteat 211 101 a 13,1 1 1 + IN 1 116,103 1 If 16 1! Total total heal 30 Ittoal Repoeabil City`s let let 31 11con of i1cote of City's It10al tote 1+1111 let tat 31 Lffected Digoltble Iffeeted hiel fu 11 ht tell over 33 Labor force hcele Labor force fu Leff 11101 Levy I Tow 1 31 f f r 39 1 ► I ► r 1 I ► IS 110,163 t 10t + 1311,611 t 10,01 a 11,111 1 HI = 1191 16 years + 11,161 lott 11: fits pereettale tepreseab lilt portiot of 111111 tit matte eapected to be geaerated by We lpplicut tit cu 11 teklogafly 1tSfibtted to ]sfruttlctue fiuocilg lots 1I: lilt wbet relreseaU 111 Putot•reaideat uployets Inteated by tie applicttt'I locltilg it pistol. e i A o r~ lIPItS1I0CtOl1 PIIhICIICI1C0101IC if16i11S IODtt psCt 1 tttiaeted ~ Canttactioa lalae o! ( Colt of laleriall aI Corrtrictica City's City's tee let tpplitut's percent of laterials pales lrroal lots laical let ht facility Cotatrutlot Pirciued fax iu II 111 tell ever Costa Is Denton late feel lleloe tall ! Teat 1 still Ia1leveau: v r v v v e ! fru Corrtrictioa 193-0,400 s 541 = 1111,040 1 10.41 = 11,150 s 100i z (1,354 1 1 feat = 11,150 3 4 1 Coatribntios 1 Coatrlbition 5 lcitill laaoal to to 1 leverte lefefoe I01 IOI 8 Itillty Went: I fros IIectric (481 11,85! t i! = 191,111 s OS :11,130 1 6 falls : 114,152 IQ 11 li Calcalatioa of loitill ilectric levesaa 13 14 11,500 1 0.08SSM08,111-1,5001 1 0.4351 ► 01,410 t 0.019W031.0-20117} a 20 : 11,88! 15 . . 16 1 I I I 11 first rate rrcold rate lrrrly deuad drraad facility I 11 rite rate Cast late clash t 11 block block ldjuheit j !0 (ICI) 11 : 21 11 Calcaluios of loftily later/luteaater teveote 21 (bud on 10,000 fillou par ioitk corruption) i i5 fron later (1C, I iltil• 1111 r 11 = BI,B11 s d.1s = iltl s 6 ?earl = 1620 21 frof lever (ICDI 1111 t 1! = 11,61! s 11.11 = 1119 1 I fears = 1111 2B lulades . facility Ciar(e f0ilt IlMIPIi (1!,611 lots 11; Pill perctitals refrelelts tilt partial of Haul to re►enae elpetted to be Merited by till appllcut tiat cu It reuoully fttribated to lafrutracttre fifuciit t II I 1 a 1,~ r Page 1 Infrastructure Financing/Economic Analysis Model Narrative Line 1 A five year analysis window is standard among financial institutions. A longer term analysis window would affect reliability. 7 Construction cost is estimated by Utility Department staff. It includes vendor costs plus 358 for administration. 11 Debt service is predicated on a 28 annual principal payment and a 7.58 annual interest payment. 15 Return on Investment to the General Fund is predicated on an annual, non-varying 68 of construction cost. 18 Capital Cost Total is composed of Debt Service plus Return on Investment. 21 Benefits Total is composed of: Property Tax Revenue Sales Tax Revenue from: products and services employees' disposable income construction materials' cost Utility Service Revenue ; Pege 2 Infrastructure Financing/Economic Analysis Model Narrative Line 9 Property Tax Revenue is predicated on $0.61 per $100 of applicant's plant, property, and equipment value. It is expected that 258 of this revenue will be directly attributable to the Utility Department's financing. The dollar value of this percentage is represented by Net Annual Tax Levy. 17 Sales Tax Revenue from applicant's local sale of products and services is predicated on $0.01 per $1.00 of those sales. it is expected that 258 of this revenue will be directly attributable to the Utility Department's financing. The dollar value of this percentage is represented by Net Annual Tax Levy. 26 6 36 Sales Tax Revenue from Employment is predicated on a disposable income factor of 408. It is expected that it least 508 of the applicant's employees will live in Denton and that each one of these Denton-resident employees will, in turn, generate two additional man-years of employment for other Denton-resident employees. "1 1 . Page 3 Infrastructure Financing/Economic Analysis Model Narrative Line 1 Sales Tax Revenue from Construction is predicated on 50% of the project's cost being expended on construction materials and all of those materials being purchased in Denton, 9 Calculation of monthly electric revenue is predicated on I the electric consumption of an existing applicant facility of similar size. When no such facility exists, consumption is based on the applicant's estimates or the facility's size, intended use, equipment, and electrical system design. ' c The Contribution to Return on Investment (Rol) percentage represents the portion of the applicant's anticipated i utility payments that will accrue to the Rol. 15 Electric service will normally be provided to an applicant under the General Service (GS) rate schedule. Under this schedule, the first 2500 KWH's are billed at 0656 cents per KWH= all additional KWH's are billed at the rate of . 035 cents per KWH. In addition, all K"ni's are billed at the KWH-EnMoergy 019 cents per thee highest KW usage during as registered on a customer's demand meter and is billed at the rate of $7.00 per KWH. The Facility charge is $20 per 30 days of service. 26 Calculation of monthly water revenue is based on water consumption at an existing applicant facility of similar site. When no such facility exists, consumption is based on the applicant's estimates or the facility's design, intended use, and equipment:. Watar service will normally be provided to an zpplicant under the Commercial/rndustrifil (WC) rate schedule using, for purposes of this model, a 2" water meter. Under this E schedule, all water gallons are billed at the rate of $2.20 per each 1,000 gallons. The Facility charge for a 2" meter i is $22 25 per 30 days of service, The Contribution to Return on Investment (Rol) percentage represents the portion of the applicant's anticipated utility payments that will accrue to the Rol. i .r i a t pw , 1 Page 3 (cont.) 27 Calculation of monthly sewer revenue is based on the applicant's water consumption. Sewer service will normally be provided to an applicant under the Commercial/Industrial (SCD) rate schedules. Under the SCD schedule, monthly wastewater gallons are calculated as 98% of metered monthly water gallons. All wastewater gallons are tilled at the rate of $1.85 per each 1,000 gallons. The Facility charge is $22.25 days of service. J The Contribution to Return on Investment (ROI) percentage cJ represents the portion of the applicant's anticipated utility payments that will accrue to the ROI. I i i J w r i City of Denton city council yinutes 4 2 . April 3, 1990 ?age 3 checklist had cean provided of materials and informs dad by staff. Staff would be reviewing the list fo as that might be necessary such as eliminatin ome re Monts. Mayor rem Ayer asked if the new GIS equipmon with som the needed information, ght hasp Robbins repl as after all the information r": imputed. Council Member asked if a confli amt up between a builder and an in or regarding a s plans, was there one individual who w ender a dects regarding the plans. Robbins stated that th ns w according to the approved p have to be inspected Council Member dopkins st\ ha requirements that the City shat she had a list of She asked that as the t no one else required. meeting of the Builder'pro rwas d+ could staff go to a arcistion Z \ sin the process. Mayor Stephens asks /a check had beert~ r to see if they treamlinin their of ocher cities Lewisville as t d just updated their yak.. particularly Crace$$ tom cAdama stated it the If t it were eight would than forr o take our da be wrong, \ Co Member Boyd stated that the rules needed toad by all and that they be applied s uniformly 5. The Council held a discussion regarding proposed changes in policy for candidate water/sewer lines. Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, reviewed the background information on the policy. The Land Use Planning Committee developed a concept of balanced growth - not only geographically but also between residential and industrial concept Board be lookedOat00and that money would be available to help industrial customers or some type of development. Out of that process, a whole list of guidelinesa bocam* quite complicated developed, unworkable '1 The Public Utilities Board was suggesting the following policioso (1) during its annual review of the Utility Department's Capital improvements Plan, the Board would consider the allocation of !500,000 for the construction of candidate water and/or sewer ines to serve only industrial prospects which had committed to EXHIBIT e i F ~ G U City of Denton city council Minutes April 3, 1990 Page 1 building facilities in Denton, (2) the City of Denton would adopt a policy of 'responding' to growth rather than attemp,.inq to 'lead' growth, (3) all candidate water and sewer lines would be submitted to the Public Utilities Board to be considered on a case-by-case basise 111 only those candidate water and sewer lines which would serve an industrial prospect which had committed to building facilities within the city of Denton, Texas, would be considered, (5) the Public Utilities Board would prescribe and obtain from each industrial prospect appropriate evidence of the prospect's commitment to building facilities within the City of Denton, Texas, (6) upon review of such evidence of commitment, the Public Utilities Board might recommend to the Planning and Zoning Commission that funds be made available to provide water and/or sewer service to the prospect's facilities, (7) annual funding, through the Capital improvements Plan, in the amount of $500,000 for the construction of candidate water and sewer lines would be continued, but the cumulative total of such funding would not exceed $2 million at any time. These proposals had not yet been to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Council Member 3orton asked about keeping some money for non-industrial purposes. Nelson replied that $150,000 would be placed in the Capital improvements Plan for non-industrial purposes, council Member McAdams suggested that the wording j lead / follow might not be appropriate. She felt, that the 1 intent was to be able to respond to a proposed development. It i was not proposed that sewer/water lines would be developed in advance# anticipatin available so development. that when a p ospect ncame along, negotiations could be done. Mayor Pro Tom Ayer stated that he had reservations about the proposal as it proposed very substantial changes in policy. Ke was concerned about the change as he felt the concept of balanced/compact growth was a valuable ne and should be thesreport ofH*thwas L nd Us once PlanningtTasktforceawhich he did not want to see abandoned, Nelson replied that the concept was still there. It was saying that the money was available but instead of trying to put it in the ground where nothing existed and no commitments existed, it was making the money available. The Council then convened into the Regular Session at 7100 p.m. in the Council Chambers, w~ ~ J c t a , I MI S LAN LINE - MAY 31 1990 7;pQ pM In Attendancei Robert E. Nelson, P,E „ Executive Director of Utilities C. David Ham, P.E,, Director of water/wastewater Utilities Frank Robbins, Executive Director of Planninq/Community Develop. Robert Thompson, Member, Public Utilities Hoard Mark Chew, Member, Public Utilities Board Jim Engelbrecht, Member, Planning and Zoning Commission Ivan Glasscock, Member, Planning and Zoning Commission Frank Robbins opened the meeting b city Development Guide pertaining to pUtilitiesta (2) the Watertand Sewer Lines Guidelines used for determining priorities of eligible candidates. Frank Robbins and Robert Nelson recapped the history of the candidate line concept and how the guidelines had failed to attract new business into Denton. Several ideas were introduced by the Public Utilities Board mambersi a) The $300,000 (=230,000 for water/$250,00ewer) would beset aside each year for a2mulad ""a" c b) Unencumbered funds would be allowed to grow to not more E than a total of $20000,000. c) These monies would be used to follow growth, not to lead growth. i Robert Nelson also introduced an economic model to be used to evaluate the benefits of a committed industrial prospect. Payback of benefits to the City of Denton must exceed projected capital costs of construction over five years, The payback of benefits accruing to this investment would be calculated as followst a) 254 of ad valcrum tax on prospects, property b) 294 of sales tax on prospects, Denton sales i services c) 1004 of construction sales tax d) Prospects' electric gumption payments contribution to retux., an investment - 34 a) Prospects, water consumption payment contribution to ratuxn on investmentlEXH I g I T.I. NI~Rµ E1 Prospects, wastewater payments contribution to return on investment - 12% 91 Each of prospects' employees can be expected to generate two additional Denton employees h) 504 of prospects' employees and 50% of additional employees can be expected to reside in Denton , 1) 23% sales tax of employees disposable income j) disposable income equals 40% of total income G: k) Candidates would be handled on a first come, first served basis. A general discussion followed in which there was no consensus of opinion. A follow up meeting was proposed when a firm agenda could be established and the staff could return with a proposed plan which f could be written into an ordinance. 1 Meeting adjourned at S OO A.M. rot, 2DHOW DOC j i i + ti ► 614 kw y EXHIBIT I Minutes Infrastructure Financing Committee Meeting Tuesday. Juiv 1U. kv9u 7:UU A.M. Committee Memoers In Attendance: John Thompson - Public Utilities Board Mark Chew - Public Utilities Board C- Jio Englebrecht - Planning and Zoning Commission [van Glasscock - Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Members in Attendance: Bob Nelson - Executive Director of Utilities Frank Robbins - Executive Director of Planoin; Dave Has - Director, Water/Wastewater Utilities Joseph lalentl - Administrative Assistant, Water/Wastewater Utilities F The meeting began with a review of the Economic Analysis model, At Bob Nelson's request. Joe [alsnti walked the Committee members through the model, Jim Englebrecht asked about the origin of the various percentages that were used in the model to calculate tax revenue benefits, He also wanted to know how scaft determined that 3U% of any new prospect's eapiovees would reside in Denton, He stated his concern that the Dublic might also ask sucn questions and staff should ue preuared to Dick up any percentages used in the sodsi, Vrank RobDlna responded that staff light be able to document thew percentages! however, whatever percentages were used, the same percentages would be applied each time an analysis was done, John Thompson was concerned that a large industrial utility consumer such as Matsushita might require expenditures for Denton's construction of additional utility capacity such am an expanded water plant- Bob Nelson admitted that was a possibility, but stated that it was not accounted for in the modei, Such an expenditure would need special handling and approval, The Committee accepted the Funding policy, out suggessted changes to the Selection policy and the application process. Jim Englebrecht questioned the definition of value-added goods to used in the Selection policy, Since no definition could be agreed upon, that term was replaced with one referring to goods previously manufactured elsewhere, but consumed in Denton, ~4 1 AB ' T I w W 1 NIPe`r ~F v l I1 = WN~SIAIC pN\?M~ T 'M r, Minutes Infrastructure Financing Committee Meeting Page 8 John Thompson wanted to know if service industries would be eligible for funding, The Committee agreed to include specific POLICY language permitting funding for corporate headquarters. Mr. Thompson also thought that the Infrastructure policy should be available not only to new local industries, but also to existing local industries that were expanding in Denton, The Committee recommended tnat the Intermlttment disbursement of Infrastructure funds be oersltted as construction work on the sub.lect utility lines progressed. There was much discussion concerning the chronology of Board and Commission reviews and recommendations. Frank Robbins presented an alternative chronology in which the PUS forwarded Its recommendation to P & Z which, In turn, forwarded its recommendation and the Board's recommendation to the City Council, The Cossittee accepted this chronology. The Comaittss next considered the policy's suggested waiver of that provision of the Sub-Division ordinance requiring the construction of utility lines across the frontage of a prospect's property. John Thompson thought that the model should include the cost of this frontage infrastructure even if the requirement were waived, Dave Has explained that the the financing of infrastructure to the edge of the prospect's property was an Incentive for the prospect. To 111 then require that the prospect spend Its own monty to extend utility lines across its frontage from their property edfe would effeotively remove that incentive. Mark Chew requested that the Committee most again on July 204 1990 at TIUU A,M to review the policy after the suggested changes had boon made. h 1 V t DATE: July 200 1990 SELECT CpMMIUEE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD AND PLANTING 6 ZONING COMMISSION TOi MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD AND PLANNING 6 ZONING COMMISSION FROM: R.E. NELSON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES SUBJ: INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING POLICY RECOMMENDATION: That the Infrastructure Financing Committee consider recommending to the Public Utilities Board and the Planning and Zoning Commission approval of the attached Infrastructure Financing policy. BACKGROUNDi In August, 1988, the Denton Development Plan recommended an economic growth incentive policy that promoted balanced growth throughout the City. In response to this recommendation, the Public Utilities Board and the Planning and Zoning commission, in a joint meeting in February, 1989, approved the Guidelines for Fundin and Selectin Develo ent Plan Candidate Water and Sewer Lines. These Gu de nos pre a or bed a process by wh c the Ut 1 ty department's Cap to Improvements Plan would set aside up to $500,000 annually for water and sewer line construction to encourage economic growth in selected areas of the city. The Guidelines also prescribed a rating and ranking criteria by which such lines would be selected for . In Councilcandnin May,, 1989,1the,Bothe ardGconsideredwfundingapproved lines Calong Masch Branch Road. The Board also expressed its concern that several of the Guidelines' top-ranked lines were in the southern part of the City where economic growth was already sufficient. Therefore, the Board proposed a revised Guidelines policy that abandoned the rating and ranking criteria-ARa prov ded construction funds only for lines serving industrial prospects. A During its April 3, 1990 meeting, the City Council reviewed the revised Guidelines and expressed its concern with the Board's fundamental revision of policy. Therefore, the Council directed the Board and the Commission to form a joint committee to reexamine the revised policy. Pursuant to the Council's instructions, a committee was formed and held its first meeting on July 10, 1990. The Committee reviewed this new infrastructure Financing policy, recommended some changes, bul: otherwise gave the Policy its tentative approval. The Committee avreed to meet again for final Policy review on July 20 EXHIBIT. w.a F Y i' FISCAL IMPACT: Both the current Guidelines and the proposed Infrastructure Financing Guidelines call for up to $500,000 of annual Utility Department Capital Improvements Plan funding. No other fiscal impacts are anticipated. ' PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: City of Denton Utilities, Developers, Citizens and New Prospects Respectfully Submitted: el~ E. NELSON Executive Director of Utilities P epared By: r SE H I dministrative Assistant t Approved Sys Ft DA I H , D1R9TCT ater/Wastewater Utilities i i INFRA.DOC 1 . N ~r rn.me:ry I EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES July 23, 1990 7. REVIEW AND CONSIDER INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING POLICY. f Nelson introduced this item and advised that John Thompson ahd Mark Chew were members of the task force that reviewed the* policy and are trying to develop a new Infrastructure financing policy. Essentially the new policy the Utility still return $500,000 each year toptheiprogrami however, instead of doing an analysis, staff waits for a potential customer to apply and then looks at various criteria. Three types of customers will be consideredt 1) Industrial committed prospects, 2) industrial/retail building in the city but selling outaido the city, and 3) commercial retail operations manufacturing items sold in Denton. The staff will determine the feasibility of extending lines, the cost of the line, a five year payout on the line, cost vs benefits, (251 of ad valorem tax base, 251 sales tax, etc.), revenues normally attributable to return on Investment portion of our electric, water and wastewater, etc. If there is a positive net cash flow, then the project i will be recommended. The applicant will do the work and the city pays after a e certificate of acceptance is issued, The customer is then directed to the Economic Development office and they present the positive issues about the city, Staff then begins to work with tho rest of the city organizations, i.e,, Public Utilities Board, the Planning and zoning commission and after that, these two recommendations will be forwarded to the City Council. Frady asked if any changes were made to the proposal by the ' Planning and Zoning Commission, would the Board be notified before the item was sent to the City Council, Nelson replied that any changes relating to the dollar amounts would require that the Board again review the item. Laney expressed a desire for the PiZ to look at traffic patterns, etas, before final approval of these projects, , After general discussion, LaPorte made a motion to recommend to the City Council acceptance of the policy as presented. Second by Chew, All ayes, no nays, motion carried. EXHIBITAL 11 r , ~ .4 11 1 C UM Revised 11/9/90 Utility Adm. Dept. DRAFT INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING POLICY Funding Policy The City of Denton Utilities bepartment policy is to facilitate G local economic growth through a program of Infrastructure Financing. During its annual review of the Utility Department's Capital Improvements Plan (CIP), the Public Utilities Board shall consider the allocation of up to $500,000 annually to finance the construction of infrastructure water or sewer lines. This allocation shall consist of $250,000 from the Hater CIP and $250,000 from the Wastewater CIP. That portion of each annual allocation that remains unobligated at the close of the fiscal year shall be transferred to the fund Balance and may be reallocated for Infrastructure Financing in k the following year's budget. However, the cumulative total of said unobligated annual allocations shall not exceed $2 million any time. Selection Policy Infrastructure financing shall be provided only tot 1) Industrial prospects which have committed to building facilities in Denton. 2) Commercial/retail prospects which have committed to j building facilities in Denton and whichi # ! J a) Sell a majority of their goods or services to 1 individuals or businesses outside of Benton, or b) Manufacture goods for consumption in Denton which ! were previously manufactured outside of Denton, i 3) Prospects which have committed to building corporate headquarters facilities In Denton. All requests for Infrastructure Financing shall be subject to the economic analysis detailed in this Policy, This analysis shall determine project costs and benefits over P. five year period, Infrastructure Financing may be allocated only if project benefits are equal to or exceed project costs. For purposes of the economic analysist J o Project costs shall consist of 1001 oft 1 - Debt service associated with the subject utility line's construction, and 1/11/91 w ' AN Return on investment subject utility line associated with the completed o Project benefits shall consist of 251 oft Revenue from ad valorem tax on prospect's local ' - property, plant and equipment Revenue from sales tax on prospect's products and services sold by the Denton facility Revenue from sales tax on local purchases by the Denton-resident labor force generated by prospect's locating in Denton and 100% of: Revenue from sales tax on prospect's local purchase of i its facility's construction materials Revenue from that portion of the prospect's local consumption of Denton utilities that is contributed toward the return on investment. o Funding of projects shall be granted based on the date of submission of application; i.e., first come, first served. o Lines under consideration shall begin at an existing City t main line and end at the edge of the prospect's property which is closest to the existing mtln and which is technically feasible. o The funding recommendation shall state funding limits for the total project and its construction components as well as a time limit on the funding commitment, o Funds shall be dlsoucaed to the prospect or the prospect's designee onlyt 1 1} upon presentation of a Certificate of occupancy for the prospect's Denton facility, or 1 2) in intermittent a as construction of the subject utility line p progresses. progresses. 1 I t/toot r Application Process STEP ONE Infrastructure Financing applications shall be available from the City's ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICE. This office shall: - Provide prospect with economic assistance information - Provide prospect with an application form and assist with its completion Notify affected Departments of prospect's application - Coordinate the prospect's access to City Departments Prepare an economic assistance package for the prospect STEP TWO Completed applications shall be returned to the Economic Development office which shall forward a copy of the prospect's completed application tot r PLANNING DEPARTMENT for preparation of a land use analysis and the r UTILITIES DEPARTMENT for preparation of a five year economic analysis, and technical and cost assessment of providing utility service to the prospect. STEP THREE The PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD shall review the prospect's f application, the technical issues of providing utility service to the prospect, the completed economic analysis and forward a recommendation for funding consideration to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Such recommendation may support the prospect's request for an exemption from those provisions of the Sub-Division Ordinance regarding the extension of utility lines. ' 9TEP FOUR The PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION shall review the prospect's application, a completed land use analysis, the economic analysis and the Public Utilities Board's recommendation and forward BOTH the Public Utility Board's and Its own recommendation to the City Council. I _~ittiot I I r ra r ~ , i , Pi2i Minutes August m, 1990 Page 66 Motes i-o walot - tngelbrech would bring the area into t • Land Use Plan and give the fairgrounds ty. _-He also wants to continue to v i a more flexi for them and other t cilvic functions. IV. Consider policy relating to the city extension of city water and wastewater lines to economic development candidates. Mr. Robbins narrated the history of the policy saying that when the Denton Development plan (DDP) was adopted there was exten ions atrC ty icost. The policy that pcriteriaf for tthe* "candidate" lines was found to be problematic, indicating r lines in parts of the City where economic growth was already sufficient. Also, the policy set amid* money to help "hot prospects" for six months of the year. It the money was not spent in six months, it was to be used for a candidate line. Candidate lines are for areas where the City might want to have lines in the future. Therefore, if a hot prospect appeared after the six month period, the City would be unable to provide economic incentive. Also, extandinq lines to vacant land where there is no interest would create a rate increase. The Public Utilities Board (PUB) has recommended only extending lines to hot prospects. A new set of criteria is included with the new policy. Mr. Glasscock and Mr. tngelbrecht have been on the coaittae working on this new policy. The policy is that during its annual review of the , Utility Department's Capital Improvements Plan (Cip), the PUB j shall consider the allocation of up to $00,000 annually to fnance the line. This construction shall onristuof $350,000/fror e om the t Water CtP and 50, Infrastructure f nancing shall be provided onlyetose C P. ` 1) industrial pprospects which have committed to building i facilities In Denton 7) buuildiing facilities prospects n arch vhi h' commitcedd to ? a) sell a majority of their goods or services to individuals or businesses outside of Denton,m and/or b) manufacture goods for consumption in Denton which were previously manufactured outside of Denton 3) Corporats headquarters prospects which have committed to building facilities in Denton. For purposes of the economic analysiss Project costs shall consist of 1004 ofs s debt service associated with the subject utility line's construction, and a return on investment associated with the completed subject utility line. HIBIT i . .r K.*M Crof f PiZ Minutes August a, 1990 Page 7 Project benefits shall consist of 251 of: • revenue from ad valorem tax on prospect's local property, plant, and equipment • revenue from sales tax on prospect's products and services sold by the Denton facility • revenue from sales tax on local purchases by the Denton- resident labor force generated by prospect's locating in Denton and 1001 ofi • revenue from sales tax on rosct' its facility's construction materials local purchase of • revenue from that portion of the prospect's local consumption of Denton utilities that is contributed toward the return on investment. Ms. Brock asked vhat will be the return on the City's investment. Mr. Robbins replied that the Utility Department pays Into the general fund an amount equal to 61 of the capital cost of the investment. when a line is built, 61 of the cost goes to the general fund. This is done In lieu of fees or taxes. Ms. Brock asked how the 251 figure vas determined. Mr. Robbins answered that it is an average that relates to kinds of services. the coat is actually a little less than what they are paying. 251 is a general number that will keep things simple. Inqel Mr.ked thebPUS to oni or the ncummbbeerstand try to enhance then , over time. Mr. Robbins continued that funds shall be disbursed to the I prospect or the prospect's designee only as followsr 3r 1) upon presentation of a certificate of occupancy for the prospect's Denton facility, or 2) in intermittant payma,ts as construction of the subject utility line progresses. fi The Commission reviewed the proposed policy and related i formulas, Me, Brock commented that one Council member was concerned about balanced grouch, It a request for a line was made in an area that would distort growth ppattems, would the Conission be able to recommend that no Clty-funded extensions be uds? Mr. Robbins said yes, The request could be denied on a policy basis or in conjunction with a toning case. Ms. Brock asked what if the site was toned properly and the My just did not want to use city funds? Mr. Lngelbreeht explained that the proposed policy addresses the eoonemlo aspects of extension, not land use. The process rsooiMndstien extensions hplaningland toning cliasionmawhich will in turn make a recommendation to the City Council. The Csesiselon would look at the policy and then apply it in terms r M srx e~ 1 J PiZ Minutes August a, 1990 Page e of the DOP. The PUB recommendation will be based on economic viability. Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of the policy relating to the city extension of city water and wastewater lino@ to economic dtvelopment candidates. Seconded by Mr. Engelbracht and unanimously carried (6-01 - Work Session i Discuss the platting process rewrite and con G appointment of a Pia committee, r. Robbins reported that he has visited W ooae tential members for the committee. Most of, only e time at night. Staff can work with the c tee or Commission can appoint a member to be/t air. Mr. t asked how long the committee will a to meet. i Mr. R said it should take three the. There would b meetings a month for tw three hours. There is dy a draft ordinance red that would allow star prove minor subdIV a. Mr. Holt volunt to be on t//hf itted. 8. Discuss Attorney C to 0P J8-1100. Mr, Robbins stated that on says that two things have to occur before pla can be required. There must be a division of prop layout of struts. If the site is on an a street and there 'is subdivision but no la o roots or parks then platting is not requ P nq can be required j Inside the city lim when P y is divided for J development but wh a pro,~ert in the CTJ there must be a layout roots as wel Two Weeks ago a j predesign as r which had a h on an existing k street. We told they would not he plat. Staff will cons erue requirement to exte tilitles as public which d require platting. VI, Director's Repo Chapter E95, 1 Oovernment Code, "Impact fses", Mr. Aobbi sported that the City Council has roe a brlelinq spent fees. The City is not charging impae s on nit structed lines. There was a time when thl allow t that changed as of June 1990. There may stil pro on lines constructed by developers. bbins introduced Steve Seep, a new Urban Planner. Mr, e has boon working with the privets sector and has done k planning, He will be working mostly in long range ann ng. Meeting adjourned SiS1 p.m, Y . r y ~ i r ~ i e.sue:T~ I OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM TO: Robert E. Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities FROM: Debra A. Drayovitch, City Attorney SUBJECT: Proposed Infrastructure Financing Policy DATE: September 26, 1990 - Pursuant to your request of September 4, 1990, r have prepared a resolution adopting the above-referenced policy and have made minor revisions to the document you forwarded. Most of the changes I have made to the policy are very minor and I do not think any change the intent of the policy provisions. I would note that the final paragraph of the Funding Policy, which provides for the carrying forward any portion of the allocation which has not been spent into the next fiscal year. Sec. 8.06 of the City charter provides that all appropriations that have not been expended or lawfully encumbered shall lapse at the end of the budget year. Thus, this paragraph of your policy violates. this particular Charter provision. I have discussed this with John McGrans and would recommend that l you revise this paragraph to read as follows: That portion of each annual allocation that remains unobl gate a the c ose o e sca year shall be rans errs an may a reallocated- for infrastructure Financing In the o ow nq year's Should 'you have any questions in this regard, please do not hesitate to call. Debra A , . Drayovitc DAD:lah Attachment va-M I ENTIff xot Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager 1 { T--- j: r- - s -w L s a OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM TO: Robert E. Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities FROM., Debra A. Drayovitch, City Attorney SUBJECT: Infrastructure Financing Policy t-. DATE: December 4, 1990 Pursuant to your request of November 1, 1990, I have reviewed the statutes applicable to cities making grants of public funds to private entities for purposes of "economic development." For most developments, a participation agreement between the city and a developer is governed by state bidding laws, TEX. LOCAL GOVT. CODE ANN., Chapter 252 (Vernon 1988) and the city may not finance more than 30% of the improvements without bidding and letting the construction of the project. TEX. LOCAL GOVT. CODE ANN. ¢212.071 et. seq. However, recently the state legislature enacted a law which allows the governing body of a municipality to: . establish and provide for the administration of programs for making loans and grants of public money and providing personnel and services of the municipality, to promote state or local economic development and to stimulate business and commercial activity in the municipality. TEX LOCAL GOVT. CODE ANN. §360.001 (Vernon Supp. 1990). These statutory provisions authorize the city council to establish a program granting public money to a private concern if the council finds that it will stimulate business and commercial activity in the city. The policy you have provided may serve as the "program" envisioned by the legislation if the city council determines and establishes how to fund the program and to what extent it is funded. To meet t e statutory intent, I believe the infrastructure financing oc must identify an state -tie count dais for economic development 'asaswZlas o-h effeatua on o e policy will a to accom 1 sh those oa s, s ou also delineate e circumstances y wh c t he city will make payment, the procedures that are to be followed and ow resin ~ program -will-be achieved and measure 2l. 1 r _I i ! Robert E. Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities December 4, 1990 Page 2 Given these requirements, it appears that the policy you have forwarded will need some revisions to reflect the items mentioned above. You may wish to work with Betty and Frank in formulating these revisions. If I may be of further assistance plea;In advise. Debra A. Drayovitq'hDAD:lah M xc: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager Betty McKean, Executive Director for Municipal Services and Economic Development Frank Robbins, Executive Director of Planning and Community Development E 1 w ' e in. wMLx ~ v ~Mf11NC~ RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING POLICY; REPEALING R89-019= AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Denton Development Plan adopted by the city of Denton contains policies providing for the expenditure of public funds to encourage balanced growth an economic development; and WHEREAS, in furtherance of those policies, the 1991-1995 Capital Improvement Plan a allocate $500,000 each year Ve obyfuthe nd CWaterouandl Seker6eLine Infrastructure Financing to carry out the balanced growth and economic policies of the Denton Development Plant and 'WHEREAS, the Public Utilities Board and Planning and Zoning commission have considered and recommended adoption of amendments to the existing Infrastructure Financing Policy; NOW, THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: SECTION I, That the Infrastructure Financing Policy, attached hereto as Exhibit I, is approved. SECT_ I_ ON U. That Resolution No. R89-019, adopted on March 7, 1989, approving the Guidelines for Funding and selecting Development Plan Candidate Water and Sewer-Lines? is repealed. SECTI_ OIL That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. E i PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1990. BOB CASTLE BERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: 6[ APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: 111 B I Tj-,~ DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: 1 a L ' i CANDIDATE LINE HISTORY Prior to 1988, the Utility Department expended thousands of dollars constructing water and sewer lines in selected areas of the City in order to encourage growth in those areas. Unfortunately, growth in those areas failed to materialize. In August, 1988, the City Council approved and published the Denton Development Plan prepared by the City's Land Use Development Committee. One of Committee's findings was that the City's infrastructure financing policy tended to follow c growth instead of responding to growth and that this policy contributed to growth toward the southeast. The Committee felt that this policy should be changed to one that promoted balanced growth throughout the City. In response to the Development Plan, the Public Utilities Board in November, 1988, proposed a Utility Department infrastructure financing policy that would promote balanced economic growth throughout the City. Pursuant to this policy, a list of over 100 possible routes for residential and commercial lines was solicited from the public and staff. In February, 1989, the Public Utilities Board and the Planning t and zoning Commission jointly approved the Guidelines for Funding and Selecting Development Plan Candidate Water an sewer Lines o implement a new n ras rue ure financing poi y. TTie Guidelines prescribed a improvement Plan annually allocated up to , D0 for water and sewer Candidate Line construction. The Guidelines also established a criteria by which the list of proposed Candidate Lines would be rated, ranked, and selected for construction. In March, 1989, the Guidelines were approved by the City Council. In May, 1989, the Utility Department Staff completed the rating and ranking of the Candidate Lines and presented them to the Board for approval. The Board expressed its concern that several of the top-ranked Lines were in the southern part of the City where economic growth was already sufficient and did not need the stimulus of special funding. I Finally, the Board approved funding for a combination of Lines near and along Marsch Branch Road in the far western area of the City. However, due to a lack of support from many landowners along Marsch Branch Road as well as utility Department budget constraints during the 1989 fiscal year, the Board declined to recommend funding of these Lines to the City Council. 6960u XH 1 B 1T_ 1 J r ~ 1 CANDIDATE LINE HISTORY PAGE 2 r The Board continued to express its concerns about the Guidelines' selection process. Consequently, the Candidat Lin-T-e- gun$ing and selection process was put in abeyance until January, 1990. At that time, the Board proposed a revised Guidelines policy that would follow, rather than lead, econom c growth. The new policy would also do away ' with the rating and ranking of proposed lines and would make funds available only to construct lines that would serve industrial prospects which had committed to building facilities in Denton. the city Council expressed C' At its April 3, 1990 meetingr its concerns regarding the Board's f n adental revision of the Guidelines' policy. Therefore, it rected the Board Commission to further examine and t e Planning an the proposed policy change. Consequently, these two bodies appointed two members each to jointly examine the revised policy, its implementation, and its integration with the City's overall economic development policy. Pursuant to the Council's instructions, a Committee was formed and the on May r199, evisiond pert' t10 hean C mmittee's ' Following roval of the Policy t request, the Committee Zoning recommended Comm ssi on and the Public to the Board. Consequently, on July 23, 1990, the Policy Utility was recommended by the Public Utility Board to the City Council for approval and on August 8, 194Commissionlito the recommended by the Planning and Zoning City Council for approval. as reviewede by commission's Subsequent to the Board's recommendation, the policy , be revised t Department which requested that the policy incorporate language that would satisfy the requirements of ae private sconcern r refor regarding the Texas Local Government Codep public money to the granting purpose of stimulating business and commercial activity. The policy was so revised to the satisfaction of the Legal Department. At its January 16, 1991 meeting, the Public Utilitiel,Board recommended approval of the Policy to the City r _.l 1 ~ ~ g. A. February 05, 1991 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager RE: REVIEW UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT (UTRWD) APPLICATION FOR TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD FUNDS FOR DENTON WATER PLANT PROJECT AND ASSOCIATED WATER TRANSMISSION PIPELINES. RECOMMENDATION: For review and discussion only. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: At Its Board meeting of January 10, 1991, the UTRWD approved sending an application to the Texas Water Development Board for bond funds for the Denton Water Plant project and associated water transmission pipelines. There are three different series of bonds: Series 1991: Y $6,735,000 for the various participating cities and the Lake Cities Municipal Water District. I Series 19918: $2,800,000 for part of the water pipelines in which III Denton will be a "participant" with the UTRWD. Series 1991A: $2,250,000 for the non-municipal participating members. There is also a request for $10,650,000 of state funds that will be used for the benefit of the participating cities, LCMUA and the non-municipal entities which will not have to be paid back for 12 years. This application will go before the Texas Water i Development Board for approval at their February board meeting. No obligations will be incurred by the District, and thus, by the participating cities, etc., until the District requests funds from the TWDB for payment of project costs. Upon approval of this application, Denton could be reimbursed by UTRWD for i 1 1 i ~4rr a tlP~R~ f~ approximately 463 of costs incurred to date on the water plant project. 1 Regarding the $2,800,000 request for Denton related costs, these relate to the following project elements: 1. Raw water pump station 6 pipelines $460,000 2. 36" pipeline from Plant to Denton 1,380,000 3. 30" pipeline from Denton to Old Alton 3101000 4. Surveying, testing, ROW, eng., etc. 650,000 Total: $ 2,800,000 (see Page 9, Exhibit If The major project is the 36" pipeline from the plant to Denton. Denton will own 513 of this line and finance that share through its own bond issuances. The UTRWD will own 493 of this line and is financing their share via Water Development Board bond funds. The UTRWD needs approximately 63 of this line for their other members and Denton will need the remaining 433 of the 1 UTRWD's share for its requirements. From an interest rate standpoint, Denton could finance 1 this at nearly the sane rate as the UTRWD. Since this will be owned by the UTRWD, Denton water customer6 will not be paying the 63 ROI transfer which will save $82,800 the first year and decrease by 3.33 per year r thereafter. Denton will need to enter into a participation agreement with UTRWD and will establish a proportionate share of that line in that agreement. FISCAL SUMMARY: Some savings to water customers due to not paying return on investment. Respect lly submitted, Ltoy Z elXtC i M anager Pre ared/ARpLroved by: R. E. Nelson, Executive Director Department Utilities/Community Services Exhibit I- TWDB Application UTRWDTW.APP 013 1 I r . 1 t TLf \ppcai.xp al :tie '.poor Tnn,ty Re{,oral batty D~svwt itne "Ddtnct^~, a gannTen:a, tae".C, A 5a37e a carted n Denton Counter, Teas, mgether will, attachments, a pranded as an appi,oton tar f,na-C. ai \ss.ftarce !rp^ •.-e Teas dater De+elooTent boar! racer me Loan Attiftantt Program and the Pater Supply Account and ere State per-, :it..- Account of the later Revenue Fund to finance esMs opacity, as det,ned ,n \rt,c',e Ill, Secapns •1c an< -yes ;I t•e Const,t.it,on of end state al reea. In the opinmdn of Bond Counsel,,nterelt pm the Series 1991 and Series 199115 bonds will be esv%idable :ram L rose income for purposes of ftaeral income cation under stst,ng loot and interest on the Ser,et , 11 H 11411 will be ,natu0141014 in the grpss income for purpaael of federal income UW,on under esut,ng aw, APPLICATION TO THE TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD Retailing to $1,133,000 (2,230,000 Upper Trinity Regional Wafer District Upper Trinity Regional Water District Water Revenue Bonds, Sail, 1111 Taxable Water Revenue Bonds. Series MIA $2,600,00o Upper Trinity Regiahal Water District Water Revenue bonds (City of Dorton Projedel, Series 11116 • Oatedi April 1, 1111 Oum February 1, As drown below interest on the $6,733,000 Upper Trinity Regional taster District, Water Revemwe bands, Series 1991 (tna "Series 1991 bonds"); 52,230,000 Upper Trinity Rational WSW District, T&Water District, Warr Series iWA (the "Series 1991A bands"), and $2,800,000 Upper Trinity Regional G: Revenue Bonds (City of Denton Protecil, Series 111111 (the "Series 19915 bonds") (collecti'etj, tae "Sands") will accrue from tae date pf defier and w(It be payable februuy t and August 1 of each jest, Commenting ebruary I, 1992, and until be Calculated on the basis of a 360-day year of twtlve 10-day months. The delin,uve Bords will be issued only u fully registered bonds in the denorninatiaas of $3,000 or any integral multiple thereof. The bands ithe "Bonds' or "band", which theft include for purposes of definition, the "Initial 5004 1 are - "clal obligations of the Upper Trinity Reponsl Water District ithe "District"). The District h6 entered into a rei,oral treated water supply service participating member Contract with the Cites of Corinth, Donlon, Highland Village, Northtake, Pilot Point, Sang.r, and the Lake Cities MuniC,pal Utility Authoritys and a regional treated water supply service participating utility contract with the Artyle. Butonvills and Mustang eater Supply Corporations (collectively the "Participating SAemben and Utifitias") to construct facilities to enable it to supply treated water to said Cities, Authority and Corporations. Additionally, the District has entered into a joint ownership, operation and maintenance agreement for water treatment and transmas,on facilities. the City of Denton will own )I% of the capacity in the water treatment plant and be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the facility. The District will own 19ea of the capacity of the water treatment plant. The Bonds, and interest thereon, are secured and payable from certain contract payments which constitute an operation and maintenance expense of the respect va $ water systems and water and laser systems of the participating members and the City of Denton. (See "Security for the Series 1991 Bonds", "Security for the Series 1191A bdndt", and "Security for the Series 19915 bonds"). The initial Paying AgentlRegistru mall be the Amerivust Texas N.A., Dallas, Texas (see "Paying Agent! lle gistrae Priscatils from the salso o plant. transmission lines, and store facil ties, and to land the Costs costs at issuance (ciao the Project"! l. MATURfTY SCHEDULE Principal Principal Princiw Principal Principal principal Amount Ameunt Anoint Amount Amount Amount A -Serial 1118 N turn Seer` "IM M I ,11 3N 1•l a , 110,000 30,000 10,000 7.4.1113 )!0,000 123.000 160,000 2.1.2004 203,00o 33,000 83,000 2-L.0% 420,000 1/o,00o 273,000 2•!•2005 120,000 63,000 10,000 2.1.1117 433,000 133,000 110,000 1.1.2006 240,000 70,000 ID0,000 1.1.1911 493,000 110,000 203,000 2.1.3001 260,000 10,000 110,000 2•I-1111 313,000 110,000 220,000 2.1-2008 210,000 63,000 113 ,000 2.11.2000 380,000 213,000 240,000 2.1•:009 303,000 13,000 123,000 2.1.1001 620,000 233, no 143,000 2.1.1010 710,000 103,000 133'000 2.1.2001 613,000 260,0110 283,000 2.1.2011 The District reserves the right, at its option, to redeem bands having stated maturities an and after fsbruary l' 20010 in whole or in Part and in inverse ceder of rnatitity and by 141 within a maturity, if 14111$ than all of tie Bonds of shat matrity us Wled for redemption, an ro nvary I, 1000, at any data thereafter, at the pis value thereof plus accrued interest to the data fixed for redemption (sere "Redemption of Banda"). The Bonds us offered for delivery when, u and If issued and received by the pwCuaaer and subject to tM appravin A PProfessioal l Coroporrittion,t bond y CoGenital of the unsel, Dallas, Texas. of The legal opinion$ wwil be Printed on the Bonds. 17.1h.eryt Aorta 1, 1 1EXHISI"I'll J~ TASLS Of CONTENTS i G~ i i i j ~ r~ UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT Baud of Director! Name Term Area wtm Position Et cation Represented dams resided in une !6, 19l Inter i m tKLarge R.F. Nelson Vice President June ld, 1991 Interim At-Large Natalie Kelly Secretary/Treasurer June 16, 1991 tnterim At-Larie Steden L. Bacchus Member June 16, 1991 interim At-Large Vacant Member June 16, 1991 Interim At-Large John Hamilton Member June 16, 1991 Interim At-Large A.L. UtetCh Member June 16, 1991 Interim At-Large Ann Pomykal Member may 31, 1993 Denton County J. Pat Boyd Member May 31, 1993 Celina Vacant Member C": Corinth Chris Curry Member May 31, 1991 Highland Village Jim Karlovich Member May )1, 199) 3ustin Conrad Shiff tell Member May 31, 199) Krum Johnny Harris Member May 31, 1991 Lake Cities MUA Jesse Thurmond Member Nay )l, 1991 Little Elm Vacant Member Nad+lake Tom W. Porter Member may 31, 1991 Pilot Point Veeeny . Member F.K. Mullendore Member Ponder Nay 31, 1991 Prosper Vacant Member Sanger Management Of flew I Name Position Thomas E. aylor ever I. I ,Mag Jeanette Wehkamp Assistant Secretary John F. Boyle, Jr. General Counsel Coneultante and Adviaon Bond Counsel 1 Hutchison Boyle Brooks ik FEsher A Professional Corporation Dallas, Texas Certified Public Accountants Hovt, Fryman dt Company 1 Denton, Texas Environmental Civil Engineers Alan Plummer and Assioclates, on xa Financial Adviastr Arlington, Teal? First Southwest Company Daflu, Texas For additional Information rejardinj tM District, please contacts S Thomas E. Taylor General Manager or FFirst rank S3. thwetich Upper Trinity Regional Water District llN Hat Cllst Company P.O. Drawer X3 S00 First City Center Lewisville, Texas 73061 1700 Patine Avenue (ill) 21f•itie Dallas, Texu 71201 (711) 9f1-1000 41 lp~ r i NN:x Y 4 , INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT This Application of the Upper Trinity Regional 'l'ater District, a governmental agency of the State of Texas, located in Denton County, Texaa, is provided to furnish information in connection with tee sale of the District's S6,2113,000 Water Revenue Bands, Series 1991, 52,230,000 Taxable Water Revenue Bonds, Series MIA. 52300,000 Water Revenue Bonds (City of Denton Prefect), Series 19918, and the acquisition of $17,6)0,000 of excess capacity in the project pursuant to the Texas water Development Board's State Participation program as described herein. The Application was prepared to present for the purchaser of the Sands informaG00 concerning the Bondi, the revenues pledged to the Bonds, the description of the revenue base, factors that may effect pledged revenues, Ind other data, all as more tully described herein. Security for the Series I"i and Sarin 1"M Bonds The Bonds are special obligations of the District payable, both as to ?rincipal and interest, solely from and secured by a first lien on and pledge of the "Pledged Revenues" as defined in the Bond Resolution which include the "Net Revenues of the District's Water System" and certain other revenues derived from the ownership and operation of the Oistrict's Water System, including the fees and charges received under water supply contracts with the Cities of Corinth, Highland Village, Northlake, Pilot Point, Saeger, and the Latta Cities Municipal Water Authority, the participating members, and Argyle, Bartonville, and Mustang Water Supply Corporations, the Gi3 participating utilities. All payments made by the members and utilities will constitute reasonable and necessary Operating expenses of the members and utilities system., with the exception of the City of Northlake who will have a combined tax and revenue pledge. The District has not covenanted or obligated itself to pay the Bonds from monies raised or to be raised by taxation. Security for the Series I"IB Bards The Bonds are special obligations of the District payable, both as to principal and interest, solely from and secured by a first lien on and pledge of the "Pledged Revenues" as defined in the Bond Resolution, including the fees and charges received under the City of Denton l Participating Member Contract. All payments to be made by the City of Denton pursuant to the Contract will constitute reasonable and necessary operating expenses of the City's Utility System. I Debt service and all operation and maintenance expenses of the District, as defined in the Resolution authoriang and "Curing a:! Bonds and Additional Bonds, is supported by minimum annual payments under a tak"(-pay contract with the seven participating members, and three participating utilities. Optional Redemption The Bonds maturing on and after February 1, 2001, are subject to redemption prior to maturity, at the option of the Dislrlct, on February 1, 20a,, or any date thereafter, at the par value thereof plus accrued interest to the date fixed for redemption.' Tax Exemption In the opinion of Bond Counsel, the interest on the Series 1991 and Seriu 19918 Bondi will be excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes under existing law, wbject to the matters described under "Tax Exemption" herein, including the alternative minimum tag an corporations. Taxable Bonds In the opinion of Bond Counsel, the interest on the Series 1991A Bonds will be taxable to the owners thereof under the Internal Revenue Code of 1956, as amended. Purpose The District will use the proceeds from the sale of the Bonds to fund their portion of a joint 10,000,000 gallons per day water treatment plant, to fund construction of water transmission lines, to fund engineering, design, rights-of-way and other Construction related coats and to fund Costs of Issuance. Payment Record... The District has no prior debt history, the City of Denton hu never defaulted, and the Participating Members either have no prior debt history or have never defaulted. 1 y f z BOND INFORMATION 1 Purpose of the Series 1991 Bonds and the Series 1991A Bonds The L'pper Trinity Regional 'aster District will ,uue $6,7Mr.00 4'ater Revenue Bonds, Series 1991. dated _ April 1, 1991, and $2,250,70o Taxable Water Rerenue Bonds, Series MIA, dated April 1, 1991, to the Texas 'dater Development Board for the purpose of providing funds to pay tee costs and expenses incurred at to " incurred by the District incident to the engineering, design, acquisition of right-of-way, and construction of a portion of a joint water treatment plant, water transmission lines and other related facilities. The Series 1991 Bonds will fund the portion of the Project relating to the Participating Members, the Cities of Corinth, Highland Village, Northlake, Pilot Point, Sanger and Lake Cities Municipal Utility .Authority. The Series MIA Taxable Bonds will fund the portion of the Project relating to the panic paring Utilities, Argyle Water Supply Corporation, Bartonville Water Supply Corporation and Mistang'sister Supply Corporation. The District has entered into regional treated water supply contracts with the Participating Members and Utilities (see Appe dix D and e). The Bonds are being issued to fund the costs of construction. initiated in a report by the District's independent Consulting Engineers (see "The Project"). A portion of the proceeds from the Bonds will be used to capitalize interest for eighteen (IS) months, to fund legal and fiscal costs and other bond issuance costs. The construction of the Project is estimated to be completed in July, 199). Purpose of the Series 19918 bonds The District is issuing $2,500,000 Water Revenue Bonds (City of Denton Project). Series 19916, dated April it 1991, to fund the City of Demon's portion of constructing transmission pipelines and other related facilities (sea "The Project"). The City of Denton and the District will enter into a "Participating r Member" Contract for the portion of the regional transmission system being funded by the 19918 Bonds. The City of Denten and the District wilt also enter into a joint ownership, operation and maintenance agreement for water treatment and transmission facilities (see Appendix C). Additionally, a portion o: the Bonds will be used to capitalise interest for eighteen GO months, to fund legal and fiscal costs and other bond issuance costs. State participation in addition to the $6,7115,000 Series 1991 Bonds, the $2,230,000 Series 1991A Bonds, and the $2,500,000 Series 19918 Bonds, the Upper Trinity Regional Water District is making application for funds to finance 100% of the excess capacity in the proposed water system from the State Participation Account of the Water Revenue fund, to be purchased from the Texas Water Development Board within the period not to exceed 12 years from the date of delivery of the Bonds. The District The District is a government agency of the State of Tetras and a body politic and corporate, created as a conservation and reclamation district under Article XVf, Section 59 of the Constitution pursuant to Acts of the Legislature of Texas, Regular Sessian, 1949. Under the Constitution and the Statutes, the District has broad powers to effectuate flood control and the conservation and use, for all beneficial purposes, of storm and flood waters and unappropriated flow waters, and as a necessary aid to thew purposes, the District has specific authority to construct, own and operate wear supply, traatmani and distribution facilities and sewage gathering, transmission and disposal facilities, to charge for such services, and to make contracts in reference thereto with muNcipalities and others. The Upper Trinity Regional 'pater District serves sit of Denton County, except the southwest corner, plus limited portions of Collin County. The District is governod by in interim Board of Ditwofs, which were designated in she legislation creating the District. The permanent Board of Directors an appointed by the governing bodies of the participants and the contract members (public agencies not yet contracting foe utility services of the District). Each puticipant or contract member and the County shell appoint one director. A Director may not be an elected official of any governmental entity that has the authority to appoint a member of the Booed. The initial Directors were appointed for staggered terms, and directors thereafter will have four-year teems. Autlseriaatlen of BersM The bonds are beinssued pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 656, Acts of eha 64th legislature of Texas, Regular Mote, , 195), Chapter Se, Texas Water Code, Article 717M, VATCS, and other applicable taws. Under the Constitution and the Statutes, the District has broad powers to effectuate flood control and the conservation and caw for all beneficial purposes of storm and flood waters. The District hit specific authority to construct, own and operate wastewater treatment and collection systems, and to I~ ~-1 r L tfo: t 1 r x i rake contracrs m relererc* theretctfww Ith 'municipalities and others. The Oistr~ct h U re;,onAJ treated water supply Point, Sanger, the la"e Cities Munici tn the Cities of Corinth, Highland ti as entdred into Bartonville 'Later Su Da i 1 Water tuthont and Village, Vorthlake, pilot + joint water treatmpply Corporation and the Mustang Water Su ptht ly irgyie Water Supply Corporation of Denton for emt plant, transmnfion and distnbution IineilT Corporation to cons .the joint ownership of + water treatment plant of w District will Contract with the pat City city tto De ng member in the regional transmission facilities to 'ell said the City C of f Denton will have the sole responsibility for the operation and maintenance of contracting td be a plant with she District and the City sharing if, the .Opera ion Corporations, The Water distribution system. The Bonds, and interest thereon, aryu to be rereevCe ev or the the District under Me terms of inefe contracts; and District his payable pioJsoleely ly the om revenues revenues to the or the the Bonds as described in the Ordinance. Security for Series 1991 and t991A bonds payment of The District has emlered into Treated Water Supply Contracts with the Cities of Corinth, Highland Corpora Northl+ke, Pilot Pons and Sanger, Lake Cities Municipal Utility Authority, Argyle Water Supply ParCotirporacipating tion, Bartonrille Water Supply Corporation DD y Corporation, herein referred to as the "Participating Members" and the'Participating Members and Utilities have agreed tomd Siwiang Water Su J maintenance and debt service on the Series 1991 and 1991A Bonds. the District d it' s cast ot cast 0 any Additional wa PAY so the Districct t i! operation and or Bonds that are e ons will be tsimib the Parto the t c patQn~iHemben and Utilities and by Other Members which the future enter into similar treated ter supple contracts t the Drolhe of any future addition s ma water supply protect, The Participating Members and Utilities will District. with ref yin of moneys received from the operation of their respective water sewer systems, rapid ooligatlon`io an operation and maintenance es PAY their oDllgation to this District out respective Water and Sower Revenue at eT+u~ecBcn0~ u~ Members and s GeUtilities awhich is senior 10 their and pledge of the Net Revenues of the 0.is rlCt 'tTh under s the Treated Water a Above. secured by first lion on PPIY Contracts s as Qxrilsed the expense will be as toll o ofwf; operating the regional treated water supply project, including administrative awrhesd, j Annual Minlmum Water Supply Perantage• %mon Galloni of Total City of Corinth Per City ct Highland Village 1,9 17.g gi - City of Noethlake 1.00 11.11 City of Pilot Point 0.30 4.11 j City of Sanger 0.20 2,91 Cake Cities Municipal Utility Authority 00 ll,yl j Argyle Water Supply 0 Corporation 11.23 Bartonrille Water Supply Coe 0'10 3.19 W SUPPl car potation 1.00 Water poratlon N.yl y !?t~i!S~it K a The Participating Members and Utilities will DroPArlated uNticted us4ge for the widvideoenced Capacity bCapacity on De responsible for the above percentage basis, or on a similarrebesia~ relabel of to the st State future than ~ t or ges and updates concerning rater purchaees tram the Oiseriet. .g. ' G k s Tne amount necessary to pay debt service on these outstanding bonds, the amount required to est"IM r maintain any special funds required by the provisions of the Bond Ordinances, and the amount necessary ;o restore any deficiency n such special funds will be as followst Series 1991 Bonds Annual Minimum Percentage 'c'ater of Annual Su 1 SIGD Supp~__ City at Corinth )3 ISSe City of Highland Village 1.90 A.17 City of Northlake 0.30 3.66 City of Pilot Point 0.20 3.77 City of Sanger 1.00 it'll Lake Cities Municipai Utility Authority 9.90 16.96 333 13b;R% Series 1991A Bonds Annual Minimum Percentage Water of Annual I Su 1 MGO -Supply _ Argyle Water Supply Corporation YO 6.6 69r Bartonville Water Supply Corporation 1.00 66.67 Mustang Water Supply Corporation 0.1 6666 1.30 100..00% Security for Series 19918 banels The District will enter into it Partidpating Member Contract and a joint ownership, operation and maintenance agreement for water treatment and transmission facilities with the City of Denton (see I Appendix C). Under the terms of tM agreement the District and the City slue in the construction costs of a 10,000,000 gallon per day treatment plant and facilities looted at Lake Ray Roberts and two transmission tines. The portion of the construction of the transmission system which benefits the City of Denton is 100th funded by the Series 19916 Bonds. The City has agreed to pay to the District debt service on the Series 19918 Bonds. The City of Denton will pay their obligation to the District out of moneys received from the operation of their utility system, said obligation to be an operation and maintenance expense of the City which is senior to their utility system revenue debt. The Series 19916 Bonds are payable from and secured by a first lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues of the District. Reserve Fund Ro"Itetttenb I The Series 1991, Series 1991A and Series 19916 Bond Ordinances provide that, at the time of Issuance of the Bonds, there shall be created a Reserve Fund to be used to finally retire or to pay, when due, debt service on these Bonds and any additional bonds to the extent the amounts in the interest and Sinking fund are insufficient. The Participating Members and Utilities have agreed to accumulate and maintain a reserve fund equal to not less than the average annual principal and Interest requirements on tM1r respective bonds. The required reserve amount U accumulated over a sissy month period with equal monthly deposits. Redemptlun of The bens The District reserves the right, at iu option, to redeem the Bonds having stated maturities on and after February 1, 2001, In whole or in pert In principal amounts of $3,000 or any integral multiple thereof, on February 1, 2000, or any date thereafter, at the par value thereof plus accrued Interest to the date find for redemption. If fife than all of the Bonds are to be redeemed and it feu than all of a maturity is to be redeemed, the Paying Agent/Reglstrar shall determine by lot the bonds, or portions thereof, within such maturity to be redeemed. Not lest than 30 days prior to a redemption date for the bonds, the District shall cause a notice of redemption to be sent by United States mail, fiat clam, postage peepaid, to each registered owner of it bond to be redeemed, in whole or Lt part, at the addreu of the registered owner appearln an the registration books of the paying Agent/Registru at the elate of business art the business day most preceding that date of mailing such notice. Any notice of redemption te malted shall be conclusively presumed to have been duly given Irrespective of whether received by Ow registered owner. i i t r 3 s h Ir Paying AgentlRegistrar The initial Paying Anent/Registrar is Amentrust Texas N.A., Dallas, Texts. In the Ordinances iris District retains the right to replace the Paying Agent/Registrar, The District covenants to maintain and I provide a Paying Agent/ Registrar it all times while the Bondi are outstanding and any successor Paying ` AgentlRegistrar shall be a commercial bank, a trust company organized under the taws of the State of Texas or other entity duly qualified and legally authorized to serve as and perform the duties and services of paying Agent/Rsglstrar for the Bonds. Upon any change in the Paying Agent/Registrar for the Bonds, the District agrees to promptly cause a written notice thereof to be sent to etch registered owner of the Bonds by United States mail, first class, postage prepaid, which notice shall also give the address of the new Paying Agentlkegistrar. Principal of the Bonds will be payable to the registered owner at maturity or prior redemption upon presentation at the principal office of the Paying Agent/Registrar. Interest on the Bonds will be payable by check, dated as of the interest payment date, and mailed by the Paying AgentlRegistrar to registered owners as shown on the records of the Paying AgentlRegistrar on the Record Date (see "Record Date for Interest Payment" herein), or by such other method, acceptable to the Paying Agent/Registrar, requested by, and at the risk and expense of, the registered owner. If the date for the payment of the principal of or interest on the Bands shall be a Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday, or day on which banking institutions see authorized to closet and payment on such date shall have the same force and effect as if made on the original date payment was due. G: Transfer, Eechurge and Registration The Bonds may be transferred and exchanged on the registration books of the Paying Agent/Registrar only upon presentation and surrender thereof to the Paying Agent/Registrar and such transfer or exchange shall be without expense or service charge to the registered owner, except for any tut or other governmental charges required to be paid with respect to such registration, exchange and transfer. A bond may be assigned by the execution of an assignment form On the Bond of by other instrument of transfer and assignment acceptable to the Paying Agent/Registrar, A new Bond or Bonds will be delivered by the Paying AgentlRegistrar, or sent by United States mail, first cease, postage prepaid, to the new registered owner or his designs. To she extent possible, new Bonds Issued In an exchange or transfer of Bonds will be delivered to the registered owner or assignee of the registered owner in not more than three business days after the receipt of the Bonds to be cancelled, and the written instrument of transfer or request for exchange duty executed by the registered owner or his duly authoriud agent, in form satisfactory to the Paying Agent/Registrar. New Bonds registered and delivered in an exchange or transfer shall be in any integral multiple of $%000 for any one maturity and for a like aggregate principal amount as the Bond or Bonds surrendered for exchange or transfer. f Limitations an Truster of Bade CalMd fair Iteshimptian Neither the District nor the Paying AgentlRegistrar shalt be required to transfer or exchange to an 1 assignee of the owner of the Bonds any Bond called tot redemption, In whole or in part, within aS days of I the date fixed for redemptiont provided, however, such limitation of transfer shall not be applicable to AM exchange by the tegistared owner of the uncallod balan• of a bond. ! 1 f Racord Date for Interest Paytirnt The record date ("Record Date") for the Interest payable on any interest payment date means the close of business on the Ifth day of the preceding month. Uaa of Bad Pr m . I The Project [n November, i!H a water Implementation P u was developed for tAe Denton County sea by Alan Plummer and Aseociatas, wic. for the Upper Trinity Regional Water blsxict. One objective of the plan was to develop a workable implementation plan that would most the immediate wear needs of twelve entities wheels had expressed u interest in initially participating in a regional want system. The District's service area indoeas all of Denton County (except the southwest caner) and limped portions of Collin County. The plan recommends a regional water system with a developmental plan which allows for the interregional transfer of water. After evaluating several alternative developmental plane, the interregional transfer plan was determined to be the most cost-effective and provides the most overall system flexibility. In additlon, the Interregional plan will meet the short-term water mods of the South Region until a proposed water treatment plant Is constructed to serve the region. .g. 1 j fit The ,mierrlg,onal plan (the "Project") UII[ for she District to participate with tie City of Denton in constructing a 17,.07,000 gallon per day ("MGD1 water treatment plant at Lake Ray Roberts with related facilities for the delivery of water to Corinth, Highland Village, Northlake, Plot Point, Sanger, Lake Cities Slunidipal Utility Authority, Argyle 'dater Supply Corporation, Birtonville `dater Supply Corporation and Mustang Water Supply Corporation. a Additionally, the Project has been designed for excess capacity of immediate water demands of the Participating Members to allow for growth and additional participants. The District is requesting State Participation to fund 100% of costs associated with the excess capacity of the system (see "State Participation"), The City of Denton will own 51% of the water treatment plant and the District will own 49% of the water treatment plant. The City of Denton will be responsible for the operation and maintenanee of the facility pursuant to the terms of the contract with the District. Foflowjng is a delineation of construction costsi Project Costs for Cities k Water Utility Supply City of Combined Authority Corporations Denton Costs 4.9 S1GD Lake Ray Roberts Water Treatment Plant (of INGD) S 2,637,016 S $02,934 S 3,640,000 Raw Water Pump Station and Pipeline 330,730 99,270 $ 460,000 910,000 20-inch Pipeline to Sanger 1,286,010 363,990 1,650,700 36-inch Pipeline to Denton 202,644 57,376 1,350,000 1,640,000 20-inch Pipeline to Pilot Point 1,792,620 307,560 2,300,000 30-Inch Pipeline to Denton to Old Alton 736,015 213,912 310,000 1,250,000 27-inch Pipeline to Old Alton to Highland Village 1,450,560 419,140 1,900,000 20•uich Pipeline to Argyle Water Supply Corporation 109,116 )0,154 140,000 13-inch Pipeline to Bartonville Water Supply Corporation 330,730 99,270 430,000 1 20-inch Pipeline to Lake Cities Municipal k Utility Authority 779,400 220,600 1,000,000 ! 1.0 SIC Elevated Storage $41,731 2)5,245 11060,000 Booster Pump Station, Denton 241,614 65,336 310,000 Surveying, Testing and Inspection 10356,136 393,944 260,000 2,000,000 3 Engineeringlestimated) 549,546 240,454 110,000 1,260,000 iii Land and Easement Allowance 453,191 241,559 193,950 900,000 l Fiscal and Legal Cost 51,900 24,950 24,030 1)0,000 Contingency 449 3) 4 17 9 00 4 2 1 i 3 ► 5~TOQy~O I 4 0 Lear State Participation J 0 000) 0) um I I 1 0 Plus Capitalized Interest for 15 Months 3l 341 1 Total Bond issue pa[ion 30.650,000 Adds State Participation s22 Total Project t Cost water Supply The District, pursuant to a draft contract (see Appendix F), with Dallas Water Utilities, w111 hi the right to purchase at least 10 MGD from Dallas Water Utilities to provide fa the needs of the current Participating Members. The contract will extend to the year 2023, the term of the bonds and the State I Participation. The portions of Denton County and Collin County within the service area of the regional water supply system are within the planning area for Dallas Water Utilities and the water supply needs thereof are reflected In the master plans proposed by Dallas and approved by the Texas Water Development Board. Accordingly, water supply for the Project is available from Dallas Water Utilities out of existing local lakes. •9• M I , 1 i r.. S + of P seen of ' Summary resent )uool Sources... Water supply is now available to Dallas Water Utilities from reservoirs, two of which are not yet connected by transmission facilities to the water treatment and distribution system. One reservoir (Lake Ray Roberts) ss recently completed and as at act January 1999 was approximately 14s LIIed. Alt o! the reservoir are located in north central and east Texas. The following table contains data as to annual diversion rights permted to City and yield of each reservoir to the City, expressed in million gallons perdaytNCO). t"Dependable yield" is an estimate of average daily supply reliably available during a period of extreme drought corresponding to the most severe drought of record in each reservoir's drainage area. Diversion Dependable Yield Reservoir _ Rights to Dallas of Dallas vailab a Connected Lake Grapevine 76 .NGD 11 MG I! .NGD Lake Lewisville 491 MGD 16 MOD Lake Ray Roberts 521 MGD 36 MGD 336 MOD 6 MGD Lake Ray Hubbard so MOO 37 MOD Like Tawakoni 170 MGD 170 MOD 1757 MOD 0 MOD Lake Palestine 107 MGD 102 MOD Lake Fork 1 g NGD llg .y_Gxx o u~~ Total 1.561 6 G7Eb j ~j- Presently connected supply from these reservoirs Is adequate li-nt needs. Plans are proceeding on schedule to build pipelines to the two reservoir not currently connected, when the water needs of the system warrant. Usage of water supply is ordinarily limited onl b plants and the water distribution system. y 7 the capacity of water treatment i The City also purchased in 1919 approximately 6.) MOD of treated water (about 2% of fiscal 1969 avenge day requirements) from the North Texas Municipal Water District under a contract providing for treated water purchaes up to an annual average of 10 MOD. ) i r i i a •10• ~ w w ~ -op- VF , i 1 STATE PARTICIPATION In conjunction with this Application, the District is simultaneously requesting financial assistance in the amount of $10,650,000 from the State Participation Account of the `Later Development Fund. The State Participation will fund 100% of the excess capacity built in the regional water system. Of the $10,650,000 participation amount, $3,)G0,000 will apply to the portion of the Project applicable to the Cities of Corinth, Highland Village, Sorthlake, Pilot Point, Sanger and Lake Cities Municipal Utility Authority, and the remaining $2,)50,000 applies to the Bartonville %SC, the Mustang %SC, and the Argyle 'ASC. The District is requesting the $10,630,000 State Participation at the time the Series 1991, Series 1991A and Series IMB Bonds are delivered to fund the construction of the Project. The District will repay the State Participation amount through two series of bonds in the estimated amounts of $0,123,000 to refund the public entities and $4,110,000 to refund the %SC. The District will purchase the State's participation In the project on or before the year 2003. Interest on the $0,125,000 Bonds and the $4,i10,000 Bonds will accrue from the date the $10,650,000 State Participation is delivered to the District to the date of repayment (approximately 12 years). Cities and Water utility Supply Authorit CCoorrations Repayment of State Participation 0,000 S 2,33Q0 Accrued Interest 7,9101000 2,320,000 Estimated Purchase Price for 514,110,000 5,110,020 state Participation in 200) S Gc j , i I I i j I J i i 1 Simi e r ~ DEBT INFORMATION i ~e JIl, j i i 1 i I! ~ I 1 { 1 1 , f6,T3S,000 UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT WATER SYSTEM REVENUE 60NDS, SERIES 1991 (PARTICIPATING MEMBERS CONTRACT) GATED: 4/ 1/91 FIRST CPN DUE: 2/ 1/92 PRINCIPAL DUE: 21 1 INTEREST DUE: 2/ 1 B/ I YEAR END THIS S 6 13S 000 ISSUE 1992 S S $38,800 S $38,8000 0 1997 1994 175,000 $31,600 706,800 1995 190,000 517,200 707,200 1996 205,000 501,400 706,400 1997 220,000 484,400 104,400 1948 240,000 466,000 106,000 ; G 1999 260,000 446,000 706,000 2000 280,000 424,400 704,400 2001 705,000 401,000 706,000 2002 330,000 37S,600 105,600 2003 360,000 348,000 706,000 2004 390,000 316,000 708,000 i 2003 420,000 285,600 105,600 I 2006 4661000 250,600 706,600 2007 495,000 212,600 707,600 2001 535,000 111,400 706,400 2009 580,000 126,800 706,800 2010 620,000 18,800 6!6,800 2011 675,000 27,000 702,000 $ 6,73S,000 S 1,223,800 f 13,951,600 INTEREST CAICUUTEO AT 810001. -13• 1 1 f 16.27x, aao UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT MATER SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS. SERIES 2003 (PARTICIPATING MEMBERS CONTRACT) DATED: 4/ 1/ 3 FIRST CPN DUE. 2/ 1/ 4 PRINCIPAL DUE: 2/ 1 INTEREST DUE: 2/ I 8/ 1 YEAR END PRESENT TMIS f 15,270,000 ISSUE GRAND TOTAL 9/30 REQUIREMENTS PRINCIPAL _INTEREST TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 1992 S 718,400 5 S f S 118,400 1993 $38,600 538,800 1994 706,800 106,800 1995 701,200 707,200 19% 706,400 106,400 1997 704,400 704,400 1998 706,000 106,000 i999 706,000 706,000 2000 704,400 704,400 2001 706.000 706,000 2002 705,600 705.600 2003 706.000 7061000 2004 706,000 345,000 W21,661 20066,667 2,774,661 2005 705,600 370,000 1,259,200 11629,200 2,334,600 2006 705,600 400,000 1,221,400 1,628,400 21334,000 2007 707,600 435,000 1,195,000 1,630,000 203311600 j 2006 706,400 470,000 L 158,600 11628,600 21135,290 2009 706,800 $10,000 1,119,500 11629,600 21336,400 2010 698,800 556,000 1,077,000 1,632,000 2,330,800 2011 702,000 600,000 1,030,800 1,630,600 21332,800 2012 650,000 9601100 11630,600 116301600 2013 705,000 926,600 1,6]1,600 1,631,640 2014 765,000 811,100 1,632,800 11632,100 2015 823,000 604,200 1,629,200 11629,200 2016 6951000 735,400 1,630,400 11630,400 2017 910,000 660,x00 1,630,600 1,630.600 2018 1,050,000 580,000 1,630,000 1,530,000 2019 1,140,000 492,400 I, 632, 400 1,632,440 2020 1,235,000 397,400 1,632,400 11632,400 2021 1,335,000 294,600 1,629,600 11629,600 2022 1,445,000 163,400 1,626,400 11626,400 2023 1,510,000 62,800 1,612,800 11632,800 1 S 13,958,600 f 16,270,000 f 16,776,667 S 33,046,667 f 47,OOS+461 E INTEREST CALCULATED AT 8.000% FOR PURPOSES OF ILLUSTRATION. •14 • u, r1a, 00/ ' uA[A nlrlrr oliforl VAM 2111X! MrE1 i1STE111[rfW[ am$. SERIES 1Nl (►MriC104TA, u7T[111E1 CONTRACT) CATIO: 1/ 1/11 flAfl COW out: t/ 1/11 P411KIPAL Out: 2/ 1 I4T11I17 OHO: I/ 1 0/ 1 MAN IID r> if i t 7 ISIN[ 145! 1 I 1N.0N 1 700.001 r im Ill, ON in. ON I~ INI 45.000 t22.7M 20117!1 r ION !0.045 211, ON IN. I" 3145 II. ON 211.745 gI1,7N 11!7 WHO 2N,rN 271.110 h 1145 70,00 ' 2N.0N 170 INI 71.045 mg 211.[45 tw N,ON loos 145.111 tool It. me I7f.7N 171,/45 1 1060101 t003 Ii1,0N 114.1" M.rrw N1N to" 140,045 I2f.IN H t 17 00 0 1M IN no IN. » a" 217.00 M," l,Nis 171.451 71,iN 2f1,1N 2011 NINO 17.00 ! (1.111 f 6245,045 f 1,S71,ON ( 1245,045 IFMM CIIIQNIM Al 11.0m. i i i f j l 1 •1f• 1 r ~V b I' iMY~ $5,170,000 UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL YIATER DISTRICT 487E(PAATICIIPATINGUUTI~~-COSERIES NTRACT) 01 FIRST CPN DUE: 1/ 1/ 4 DATED: 4/ 1/ 3 INTEREST OUE: 2/ 1 8/ 1 PRINCIPAL DUE: 2/ 1 GRAND TOTAL THIS S 5,170,000 ISSUE iEAA TOTAL REOUI` RED TS END PRESENT PRINCIPAL INTEREST y3D FEN $ 300.000 $ $ 225.000 1992 S 300,000 f 261,750 1993 215,000 268,000 j 1994 267,750 267,150 258,000 1995 267,750 2711750 1996 71,750 170,000 1997 2 000 161,750 1998 210, 750 169,150 1999 251, 750 270,750 2000 269 270,150 170,750 2001 270,750 269,750 I 2002 269,150 685.083 770,083 1,031,6)3 , 2003 267,740 85.000 598.750 868 150 503750 866,500 2005 t64,75~0 IOS.000 482,.750 598597,.756 750 8661250 2001 170,500 125.000 59711S.000 470.7SO 457,500 545,750 872 750 '500 870,500 000 2004 272,280 165.000 /26.600 597.750 s,S0~0 2011 2010 273,000 596.500 170.000 408.500 598,500 190.000 500 $9,500 598,500 2011 210.000 383 500 5966.500 596,200 2013 366. 230,000 342.150 597,150 500.250 2014 255,000 315,150 600.250 2015 285.000 $95,500 295,500 285,500 547,730 2016 310,000 2521730 597,750 296,500 2016 000 216,500 $96,500 596,500 2019 420, ON, 116,500 391250 597,150 2020 465,000 5)2.150 , 596, $98.150 250 2421 S1S,000 ~12SO 603,750 603,750 1 2022 573,000 2023 $ 5,306,000 f 5,170,000 S 61959.333 S 12,119,333 ff 1T`IS~))~ 3NTER£ST CALCULATED AT 10.000><f0R PURPOSES OF SILUSTRA11014. j 9 i 7 . Ib i f I 1 I M I s2,9oo,aoo ~ UPPER TRINITY REOIONAL MATER DISTRICT WATER REVENUE 60ND5 !CITY OF DENTON PROJECT) SERIES 19915 DATED: 4/ 1/91 FIRST CPN CUE% 21 1/92 PRINCIPAL DUE: 21 1 INTEREST DUE: 21 1 9/ 1 y"A 943 TNES f 2 0 S _L.4 PAMINE 1992 S f 295,667 f 295,661 1993 224,000 224,000 1994 70,000 221,200 291,200 1996 601000 215,200 295,200 19% 65,000 206,600 293,600 1997 90.000 201,600 291,600 1996 100,000 194,000 294,000 1999 1101000 165,600 995,800 2000 1151000 176,600 291,800 c"2001 126,000 167,000 292,000 2002 1351000 156,600 291,600 2003 150,000 145,200 295,200 t004 160,000 132,600 292,600 2006 176,000 119,400 294,400 I 2006 190,000 104,600 294,900 f 2007 205,000 69,000 294,000 2006 220,000 72,000 292,000 2009 240,000 53,600 293,600 E 2010 266,000 33,400 296,400 2011 266,000 11,400 2961400 f 21600,000 f 1,010,667 f 6,910,667 j I INTEREST CALCULATED AT 9.000%. f 711 1 X11 ~YIV ' I I, { 1 1 F ' 1 PA PENDIS A i PARTICIPATING MEMBERS AND UTILITIES f I i ~y 1 f I a TOWN OF CORINTH Us of September 30, 1990) General Obligation Bond Data 1997-91 Taxable Assessed Valuation $205,761, 6)Y Total Funded Debt Payable From Ad Valorem Taxes f 169,000 Interest and Sinking Fund S 16,662 Ratio Total Funded Debt to Taxable Assessed Valuation 0.33% 1990 Estimated Population • 3,700 Per Capita Taxable Assessed Valuation •$33,61! Per Capita Total Funded Debt • $213 Revenue Bond Data Waterworks and Sewer System Revenue Bonds Outstanding f 630,000 Average Annual Primeipal and Interest Requirements, 1991.1991 S 71,636 Coverage of Average Annual Requirements by Stptember 30, 1190 Net Income • (1) merest and Sinking fund S 6,271 Reserve Fund $ 74,400 (1) The Town has met debt service with funds on hand and has raised water and sewer rates to meet debt service in i991, 7aterworks and Sewer System Operating Statement n e j I "law Revenues f 111,}21 S__JI4.1s30 $398.039 1702.371 47 E x pemx st Water and Sewer Contract $ 623,193 S !19 2!6 $►2__6,171 $33_0,6 !280,011 1 Total Expenses a.i)i S 9 727 24 Other 192-M 1 1416.193293 2 Syy72s117917i S_661 .0612i1 Net Available for Debt Service Lug") 12) S (a) (2) I16? uudm 523 Water Customers 1,321 11296 U) 1,266 1s200 U) low Sewer Customers 1120 10231 U) 1,194 1,2!0(3) 11139 (1) Uneuditedl cash basis figures prepared by City Officials. (2) The Town her drawn on fund balance to meet deficit and debt service. the Town raised water and Sower rates September 20, 1990 to Increase revenues. I (3) Estimated. Q ...On May 14, 1936, she Town of Corinth entered Into a 20-you water purchase contract wit S e ity of Denton, whereby Corinth agrees to purchase during any one year, the Insist of (1) the volume of water requested for that current yearl (21 the volume of water requested In any prior yearl or U) the volume of water actually used in any prior year. If Corinth does not require or receive all volume requested for a current year, where Denton was willinl and able to deliver such requested volume, Corinth shell pay Denton for such volume of water requested at the "readiness to serve" rate. Currant rates aret r Facility Charge $1!3,00 Volume Charge 0.10/m gallons Demand Char``s 20.00/M allons per day demand Readiness IQ Seeve Chula 0,4634/4 Iallons In accordance with tr,e contract entered Into with Upper Trinity Regional Water District, the City will cease taking water from Denton when sufficlent water is available from the District adequate (or the City's needs. IW' I r On Mar 21 nth entered Con trac e enton, W ereby the City of,Denton agrees to a «ept and treat allltofathe 10ewa14 and It wait$ fac 6Clons. Addlt on.lly,t Nee istthe fochar llowing sarchar0 4i BOO rater than 250harge of f 2.iD per 1,000 greater them 230 ppm S0.001)1). 6 6 pPm 50.001116, TSS Monthly Water Rates (effective September 20, 1990) esi entit C MUILIAi First 1,000 gallons Minimum charge varies Minimum charge varies from $11.93 to $)76.60 from $11.83 to $)1660 depending on the site depending on the ilia Next 29,000 gallons 0f meter o! meter Over 30,000 allons S 2.40IM gallons $ 2.401M gallons g ).12 /M gallons 2.40 /M gallons „ Monthly Sewer Rates (Effective September 20, 1990) ant mar a First 1,000 gallant $12.6) (Minimum) .6)(Minimum) CE` Over 1,000 gallons ).23/M allons 5121.2 Maximum 341 11 g None S/M gallons 110 1- l ti I t ) a ,a gMMr~ ' i +e+rw~ (At OftSepe mberl30, 1990) v General Obligation Dond Data 199041 Taxable Assessed Valuation Total Funded Debt Payable From Ad Valorem Taxes 52436,601,213 Low Self•Supporting Debt S )2 111,7)0 Net Funded Debt Payable From Ad Valorem Taxes 1 ) Interest and Sinking Fund I, ' Ratio Total Funded Debt to Taxable Assessed Valuation S 702,176 Ratio Net Funded Debt to Taxable Assessed Valuation 1.316 1.36% 1990 Estimated Population . 10,230 Per Capita Taxable Assessed Valuation - $21,991 Per Capita Total Funded Debt• $437 Per Capita Net Funded Debt - $431 Review flood pats ' Utility System Revenue Bonds Outstanding Average Annual Principal and Interest Requirements, 1991.2010 1330,610"J000 Coverage of Average Annual Requirements by September 30, 1990 Net Ineo. 2'!30'300 Interest and Sinking Fund 6.10 Times Reserve Fund S S,lif,661 Emergency Fund S 1,370,761 Extension and Improvement Fund 210,000 7,4140313 Condensed Statement of UtMty System Operations F ea En d t m e )0 Gross Revenues 1 673 7 4 513.3 1 7t 31)•1_ ~l,132 Expenuss Fueland Purchased Power $42,343,166 $46,447,913 SN ,016,018 $41,113,163 $4101)0,91) Water Purchased 134,02? Other Operating and 792,039 424,gH 701,31 Administrative 5 Expenses Total al Revenues ea „ , ~ou.te~La+lv]24 11 Net Revenue Awilable for R4 MUL-M { Debt Service and Other I Lawful Purposes Sll,f 1,36! Si9,337. 1) Sll'3~)2,063e 10,1J9,161 514,141ifits l i ~ Electric Customer 2+i246 7,117 27 00 24,731 100113 Water Customers 11'111 r924 11, ,107 16 311 16,138 Sewer Customers 16 303 , s 16,247 16,207 13,933 111,121 (11 Unaudited) cash bent figures prepared by City Officials. Utility Rates General II is the City's policy to review electric, water and wsttewater rates on an annual bails to atsure adequacy and equity. Independent consultants and City Staff ganerally perform tilt review on an alternating year basis. Pat* recommendations are submitted by the staff to the Public Utilities board for review and approval, which then makes recommendation to the City Council for final approval. To date, the City Council has approved all rate recommendations of the Publl< Utilities Board. I 1 M .r (Effective Octobere1, 1919) si n a Facility Charge } 7.50 Single phase 3 15,00 Three phase Enanv Charu umme { ~ ,Months of ti!_ a~ y~ux~ p~tober Up to 5,000 kWh $0034! par kWh plus an energy cost Over 51000 kWh +djustment $0, 0600 per kWh plus an energy cost adjustment Winter in h of .1loylm er through Aoril UP to 1,000 kWh $0,0493 Pee kWh plus an energy cost Over 1,000 kWh adjustment $0.0443 per kWh plus an energy cost r Note: When usages are less than 700 kWh adjuument charge Is $6,30 per month and the energy charge 11 SO 042)ing May through October, the monthly fae111ty per kWh, plus an energy cost adjustmcn4 Em Cos d u tmen , The variable Cost of fuel and purchased power fixed at $0,0190 per kWh for filling month over er through April, and $0,0190 pee kWh for billing month May through October, f SommerClal an_ dlr~ ~ I Facility charge s 10,00 pee month (eingle phase) i S 20.00 per month (three phase) Demand Charge $ 7.00 Per kW of demand (tint 20 kW not billed) (Mlnlmum demand is 10% of maxlmum monthly demand for May through October plus $15.00 per month for single phase or $20.00 pet month for three phase.) C-mad UP to 2000 kWh $0,0656 per kWh plus an energy cost Over 2000 kWh adJustment $0.0130 per kWh plus an energy Cost Adjustment Yatar Rata Mfoctive October I, 1990) Res1r Facility Charge 3/4" meter S 7,40 per month Volume Chars. Whttef (May ehroug tober) (November-0irough April) First 11,000 gallons 2,00/M gallons t Next 13,000 gallons 3100/14 gallons Over )0,000 gallons 1,00/M gallons 200/M gallons 1,21/M galtans 12:00/m gallons ~ 2-- r 4 d s. , . Commercial nd [MlYstrial Facility Charge 2" meter $22.25 per month Yolume Charge 32.201kI gallons Customers outside city limits pay 150% of the above rate. Wutewater Rates (Effective October 1, 19!0) Residential CommeKlalllndustrial Facility Charge $s.00 plus Facility Charge SI0.00 plus Volume Charge 1.50/M gallons Yolume Charge 1.25 /M gailoas Bllling based on 10% of monthly water consumption. Notes Customers outside city limits pay 150%0! above rates. Rate Retulatlon... Within Its boundaries, the City has eacluske jurisdiction over the electric, veal<r and sewer system rates. C I r E I 1 F i CITY OF HIGHLAND VILLAGE (As of September 30, 1990) General Obligation bond Data ~ 1990.91 Taxable Assessed Valuation 53l2,901,a76 Total Funded Debt Payable From Ad Valorem Taxes Least Sell-Supporting Debt S 7,310,000 Net Funded Debt Payable From Ad Valorem Taxes Interest and Sinking Fund $ 191,611 Ratio Total Funded Debt to Taxable Assessed Valuation Ratio Net Funded Debt to Taxable Assessed Valuation " " " " " " " " 2126% 1.2114 1990 Estimated Populatlon • 7,030 Per Capita Taxable Assessed Valuation • 507,220 Per Capita Total Funded Debt. 51,063 Per Capita ,Vet Funded Debt • 5372 Revenue Bond Data Waterworks and Sewer System Revenue Bonds Average Annual Principal a pal Interest ReQulrements,199!•2007~~~~~~~ 990,000 Coverage of Average Annual Requirements by September 30, 1990 Not Income 1Times Interest and Sinking Fund Tlmea Reserve Fund S '434,751 131,210 Waterworks and Sewr System Operating Statement I I F • E Revenues 51,311•~Jl -i.2Q{~ lxpenaat 3 1 Sl,l17,03! 1 7 t Sewer Contract $ $ MIPS S MOM Other S 276 i)7 l 7 1 $ 133,70) Total Expenses 51,93Ls!!~ 4 1 Net Available for Debt Service =ata~ Water Customers 2,291 21016 1,433 1720 Sewer Customers 20276 2,041 , + 1,433 1,610 l Year Rates + (Eltectlre 11erch 11 I990) I eRtlal and Sorinl,ler Aa. e... n .t a t to , $11,67 (Minimum) 2,001 to 11,000 0.60114 gallons 2,001 to 12000 S17,2f (Minimum) f 12,001 to 23,000 2./0/M albns ' 131. /M gallons 23,001 to )5,000 1 17,001 to 25,000 1 51 lM gallons N,OOi to 60 000 3.60/M gallons 23,001 to 33,000 1.HIM allons 3.60/M gallons 35,001 to 10,000 10,000 to 10,000 3./01M gallons 10,001 to 40 000 1.31/M gallons Over 10, 000 4.60/M gallons Over 10' 1.31 /M gallons ,000 1,31 IM gallons l w t r 1 Sever System The City owns and operates the sewn collection system. The total collection system is composed of approxlmatNy 60 miles of sanitary sewer lines. [here are 11 sewer lift stations now In the City and approximately 1 more will be required in the future. In 1956, the City entered into a 20 at contract with Lewisville to treat Highland Villap sewage. Under this contract, Lewisville treats all City sewage. The present cost of treatment charged by Lewisville 11 $1.92 per 1,004 gallons. Sewer Rata (Effectlve March 11 19") Residential ommer la u n t ntitr to d22.33 (Minimum) to y2, 000 S (Minimum) { 2,001 to 120000 2.23 /M gallons 20001 to 12,000 1M gallons Over 12,000 /M gallons Over 12,000 /M gallons i I ) 1 i CITY OF NORTHLAKA Ns of September )0, 1990) I general Obllgatlon bond Data (1) 1990.91 Taxable Assessed Valuation S=l,atl,ge! j 1990 PerCapita TaeableaAssetsedl YalWti n 00 $46,441 Per Gpita Total Funded Debt • S.p. (1) The City has no general obligation bonds outstanding. Revenue bond Data (I) Z1) The City has never Issued revenue bonds, rev k The City Is currently served water by recNve treats water from the Upper Trinity Regional The city oatlon Use System, lnltla ly, only a y Privately owned water well. Corp ply Water District through she Argyle user Sup City Plans to construct a weter distribution & system next pore' over ththe e C't (ewlyberServed with District water, Thi w t r rut o 3 e , . • Currently the City Is served by septic tanks, The City's lan . r nits averity's Denton Creek Reglonai Wastewater Treatment System, g term plan is to join jt fI I 1 d~ 1 _ r t CITY OF PICOT POINT General Obllgatlon Rand Data +of September 30, 1990) ~ 1940.91 Taxable Assessed Valuation Total Funded Debt Payable From Ad Valorem Taxes Cesst Selt•Supporting Debt S6f,061,661 'Net Funded Debt Payable From Ad Valorem Taxes Interest and Sinking F S 860,000 send 2 I Ratio Total Funded Debt to Taxable Assessed Valuation 66, Ratio Vet Funded Debt to S 169 a 3, Taxable Assessed Valuation 1.72ei 1990 Estimated Population Per C+ .2 0.98% pits Taxable Assessed Valuationf0 Per l Total Funded Debt , $Jlj 3,461 Rail Bond Data Per Capita Net Funded Debt • 5271 Waterworks and Sewer 3 Average Annual Principal sand Str1lor RolRevenue Bo ds Outstanding Interest ge of Average Annual Requirements by Septembe 199) 'I Reserve Fundln Fund .1990 Net 174,000 r 30 Income me 22,911 . 7.96 Times . Waterworks and Interest and Sewer System ?senior Llen Revenue.•••.•••• Reserve FundlnMin$ F .nd .......goods Outstanding SII,3j~00 Waterw arks and Sewer System OpersUn 919 g S. tatensertt Revenues 1 ea ad Expenses 5136,999 W4,00 1 Available for Debt Servlco g !1 1 W2,444 0111007 1--JW42 $343,032 II Water Customersi -ja'~ I Sewer Customers f DUI +w~aiT4i i S + 991 1,111 1,191 ared b f7f 9!7 I, 117 1,071 flJ Unaudiredt cash basis figuresprep 971 Y City Of!!t . 911 pumWatejn vstem " Capacity ' of The City all Pilot Point water supply P S the major watheter five wells Is 1,100 , 000 8ailo, pop welds AS the five Clty.dwned water wells. The combined 1 1 Water District. The Cle source as snort as water beco per day, The City plans to discontinue win ,OOO,b00 gUlons. Y has 2 elevated and 1 mes al llable from the U g their ground storage tanks for a combined storage tcapacity o! i went- Capacity ;1 of ?30 i T'll ,000 city owns and operates their own gallons per day. sewer treatment plant. The plant has a a 4 Monthly Yates Rates (Eilective September 00, 1099) esidentia Inside City Outside City Limas Limits First 2,000 gallons $ 5.00 (Minimum) $Il.00 (Minimum) e Next 2,000 to 4,000 gallons 1.401,41 gallons 1.401M gallons Next 4,000 to 6,000 gallons 1.80/M gallons I.101M gallons Over 1,000 gallons 2: 0/M gallons 2.00lM gallons Monthly Sever Rates (Cltectivo September 1100 1919) Reddentlal omme i}j_ . first 2,000 gallons S ' • $ 9.90 (Minimum) First 4,000 gallons 9.90 (.Minimum) For 30% Usage Over Minimum 1.001M gallons 1.001M gallons Maximum 14.00 i . i t i . 1 t . J I 6 1T( i3Y A4. YJMV~ r CITY OF SANGER (AS of September 30, 1990) lll~~~e General Obligation Bond Da4 1 1997-91 Taxable Assessed Valuation 577,293,331 Total Funded Debt Payable From Ad Valorem Taxes t S 320,7C0 Interest and Sinking Fund S x5,113 i Ratio Total Funded Debt to Taxable Assessed Valuation 7Ji% 1990 Estimated Population - 4,100 Per Capita Taxable Assessed Valuation - $17,617 Per Capita Total Funded Debt - $127 Revenue Bond Data Utility System Reven«a bands Outstanding S 1,360,000 p Average Annual Princl al and Interest Requirements, 1991.2001 S 222,76! Coverage of Average Annual Requirements by September 30, 1990 Net Income 2,14 Times Interest and Sinking Fund 95,14! Reserve Fund 242,000 Utility System Operating Statement al V a En ed 4.50.9011) ' 0. 9 9.30•Eg ~1- 1 2 6.53.61 Revenues 2 3 )2,262,663 49 2 1 2 7 Expenseu Electric Department $1,469,233 $1,361,IS7 51,)73,912 $1,319,656 $1,431,101 Water Department 149,663 !91,533 2310933 1051636 173,520 Sewer p a 39),132 1250263 90,466 40,293 46,342 Other Expenses nses 0 Total Expenses Sl.li6,916 51.666.213 53.06.33) 0 31,4940M $1.65).166 Net Available for Debt Servlee S 17~i 7fi S ! $ 5= 4 4 S 1 Water Customers 1,431 l,431 11412 1049 Sewer customers 1,404 03) 1,360 10342 11449 Electric Customers 10796 1102 1,626 1046 1,434 (1) Unauditedl cash basis figures prepared by City Officials. j (2) Fiscal year changed from August 31 to September 30, Utility System The City owns and operates its own electric distribution system. On September 1, 1964, the Clty entered I Into a 10-year contract with the Brazos Electric Power Cooperstivs, 1". whereby the City purchaws electric power and energy at the rates shown below, subject to a full adjustment charge and a power adjustment on demand and energy charges, Facilities Charge s}130,001dellvery point per month Demand Charge i 6,75 1KW of billing demand Energy Charge 9.425) ml(Is1KWM Also, the City generates electric power only on a standby basis far emergencies. M d ~ E i Monthly Electric Rates + (Effective October 1, 1990 esi ntia Service Availability $900 /month 1 June through October $$0.034234 JKW'H November through tray $0.041769lKWH , Small Commercial Summa Rates Winter Rotes (lure throu¢R October) ~NovlmDer throuaR \ravl , Facilities Charge $11.30/month 111: 30/month Energ0.03 99 7 1411 KWH a 044241 /all KWH Minlm1.30/month 30/month Large Commercial Demand Charge, First 6 KWH $30.00 (Minimum) Over 6 KW'H(June-October) 1.19/KWH Over 6 KWH(November-May) 6.29/KWH Energy Charge 0.0211KWH Water lUDD1Y The City's acity of 493 source of water Is four City-owned water wells. The four wells have a i comDineo cap gallons per minute. Thane water wells will be used as the City's emergency water supply, once the FroJect is In place. a6anHtl refer Rates (Effectlw 9tember 1, 1990) R 1 Residential and C,tmmer ia1 f+ First 2,000 gallons $10.00 (Minimum) Next 11'000 gallons I.ON µllons Over 11 000 1.10/M gallons we SY JIM . , . The City owns and operates their own sewer treatment facilities. The sewer treatment i plant as a maximum capacity of 4&0,000 gallons per 44y. I Monthly low" Rates (Eflective October is 1990) (Based on water -onlymot n ReslGnttal Commercial First 1,000 gallons $10.00 (Minimum) $ 16.30 (Minimum) Over 1,000 gallons 0.&3/M gallons OAS 14A gallons Maximum $21,00 5123.00 i I ,T 1 LAKE CITIES MUNICIPAL UTILITY AUTHORITY DAs of August 31, 19%1 1 General Obligation bond Data 1990.91 Taxable Assessed Valuation SSt7,a)6,714 1 Total Funded Debt Payable From Ad Valorem Taxes S 380,000 Interest and Sinking Fund S 91,463 i Ratio Total Funded Debt to Taxable Assessed Valuation 0.3244 1990 Estimated Population • 7,776 Per Capita Taxable Assessed Valuation • $13,134 Per Capita Total Funded Debt • $ag i Revenue bond Data I Waterworks and Sewer System Revenue Bonds Outstandin{ 736,000 I Average Annual Principal and Interest Requirements, 1991.2004 S 91,267 I C Coverage of Average Annual Requirements by August 31, 1990 Net lncoma 3.86 Times Interest and Sinking Fund 49,416 . 137,378 Reuwe fund . Waterworks and Serer System Oparating Statement , al • En ed Revenues St,240190 f SI 1~ 6 - 49 S1.01,34 SI.0161011 Expenses Water Purchased S 274,347~ S 116,856 S 176,314 S k63,931 S Awl) e9'47 t`,836 Total E W R' No 721 Expense )-4i1LlJt 4 4 4 Net Available for Debt Service S 3= S 3~96jlk •'LJALM 1.:30,41) Water/Sewer Customers 21723 21700 20930 2,518 2,434 Atte u 1 ...On February it, 1986, the Authority contracted with the City of Denton to purchase W treated water, Currently the City pays the following to Denton monthly for waters facilitlesCharge $170.00 Volume Charge 0.901M gallons Demand Char{a 27.40 /M iallons per day demand Readiness to Serve Charge 0.48381fd gallons in accordance with the contract entered Into with the Upper Trinity Regional Water District, the Authority will cease taking water from Denton when wtficlent Water is available from the District adequate for the Authority's needs. j Additionally, the Authority his four water **lit with a combined pumpage capacity of 810 gallons per minute. Wastewster System The Authority owns and operates a 1,038,000 gallons per day treatment plant. J~ r 4 d' w Monthly Water Rates (Effective August )1, 1969) Inside Authority Outside Authority(11 First 1,000 gallons $6.30 (Minimum) $10.30 (Minimum) Next 6, 300 gallons 1.90 /M gallons 1.90 At gallons Next 3,300 gallons 2.10 /M gallons 2.10 All galons Over 1),000 gallons 2.301M gallons 2.30/N% gallons (1) Minimum for customers where no sewer service is provided Is $10.30. Monthly Sewer Rates (Effective August 31, 1989) (Based on Water Consumption) Residential Commercial j G. First 12,000 gallons $ 1.30 (Minimum) $6.10 (Minimum) j Over 12,000 gallons t,20/M gallons I.10/M gallons Maximum Charge $71.90 None . I1I % 1 1111 y j r ~tW 6 V t waw~ ARGYLE WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION W of September 30, 1990) Revenue !Bond Data Water System Operating Statement I l0 Months Ended Fiscal Year En ed~._..~ Revenues 5371,310 5761,11!1 111),739 5311,620 $353,790 Expenses )]6.363 321.031 331.326 29_ 3.901 31_ 3.119 Net Available for Debt Service 3f 19 /0 79 7 23 6 7 19 Water Customers 1,007 979 903 906 179 (1) Unaudited; cash basis figures prepared by Corporation Officials. R venue Debt Outstndin The Corporation has several long term notes payable to Farmers Nome dministration. The combined principal amounts of the notes is 9332,339. The notes mature nnuaily with the final maturities ranging from 2003 to 2020. The Corporation maintains a reserve fund In the amount of 133,230, and makes debt service payments directly from the water fund. W r 1 ...The Argyle Water Supply Corporation supplies water through six wells which have a combine pumping capacity of 1,700,000 gallons per day. The Corporation has six ground storage tanks " an well water d one elevated storage tank with combined capacity of 310,000 gallons. The Corporatlon will use their supplement to process ofeupswater itingandvadd~ i Upper Trinity Water District. The the Corporation Is constructing a 250,000 gallon capacity elevated storage tank. Water Rates (E!lecUve July 1, 1990) Sin Ie Family Residential Servlcei lVrvice Availability $12.50 (Minimum) First 23,000 gallons 1,301M gallons Neat 23,000 gallons 2.001M gallons Over 30,000 gallons 3.00/M gallons Commercial Rates Service Availability S12.30 (Minimum) All usage s 3.00 per 1,000 gallons Fiscal Water Water { ~~1L Consumption We ter Was .7 e i 1916 Customers 179 91,2 (2) 293,~1ifi i 1911 906 119,016,100 )210119 1 1911 913 113,231,500 (2) 331,181 919 1 1919 120153),210 323,151 1990 0) 10007 1080442,300 1991 ;,113 110519936 310030) 1991 1,119 131,137,131 341,11) 199) 1,269 1163,910,102 0210383 1990 10371 1110021630 109,131 1993 1,113 191,211,036 019,910 1996 1,311 206,372,710 J120121 1991 1,613 213,091,360 306,111 j 1991 1,733 200,916,013 313,03) E 1999 10113 260,222,160 622,11 2000 10991 2610039093) 663,199 ! (1) Fiscal years 1963AM actual, fiscal years 199112000 projected. (2) Tower water usage due to more rainfall than normal (J) Part year onlyl through October J10 1990. s i~ 1 e... BARTOWMLE WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION Ufa of September 30, 1990) Revenue Bond Data Waterworks System Revenue Bonds Outstanding S 012,321 Total Annual Debt Service Requirement S 30,316 Coverage of Total Annual Debt Service Requirement by December )I, 1919 Net income 7.39 Times Coverage of Total Annual Debt Service Requirement by September 30, 1930 Net Income 6.76 Times Interest and Sinking and Reserve Fund $ 30,940 Waterworks System Operating Statement j 9 Months Ended Fiscal Year Ended 9-30-50(l) I -)1.19 I •31 4 t• 1 F 1 1 1_ Revenues $ 622,397 $607,210 $60!,010 $336,316 $47),399 $420,197 Expenses 416.11$9 311,741 361.719 330.9)6 141,593 )46.970 Net Available for Debt Service S 2 U=1 22 6 2l 0 0 L", ( a Water customers 1,43) 1,398 1,339 1,307 10241 1,176 (1) Unaudited) cash basis figures prepared by Corporation Officials. F t u I The Corporation supplies water from 10 wells which have a combined capacity of gallons per day, Storage lacilitia consist of 11 tanks with a combined storage capacity of 1,676,000 gallons. The Corporation will use their well water as a supplement to water received from Upper Trinity Regional Water District. !later Rata (1) affective Au/wt 14, 1917) i 0 to 2,000 gallons $17.00 (Minimum) 2,001 to 23,000 gallons 1.1) per 1,000 gallons 23,001 to 30,000 gallons 2.10 per 1,000 gallons )0,001 to 73,000 6811006 3.10 per 1,000 gallons 73,001 to 100,000 gallons 4.10 per 1,000 gallons Over 100,001 gallons ).10 per 1,000 gallons (1) The Corporation to currently undergoing a water rate study. WSW Sala Water Fiscal 141 We far SSaal T les_ 1966 180,4 04 1917 270,321,000 31109)4 1988 218,6100200 303,632 1989 2130491200 3391369 1990 (1) 196,432,100 349,01) (1) For nine months only, through October I3, 1990. t aj r 1 % l MUSTANG WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION (As of September )0, 1990) s Revenue BwW Dau 9 Months Ended Fiscal Year Ended 9.30-90(l) 12.31-39 12.31.16 12-31.37 12.3i-66 RevenuesWater Sales $ 66,702 Si21,60) $206,043 $193,3110 $164,203 Water availability Fee 77,934 67,933 -0- -0- -0- instanation Fee 6,300 13,200 16,304 20,900 16,23) Tap Fee 4,500 3,260 1,300 6,)40 4,730 Other 01047 7;y73 11.969 9.120 6.122 Total Revenues 4 3 5242,034 5230,240 5213+)26 Expenses 143 194 $161,910 S177.8% 12 17 763 I Net Available for Debt Service 3 309 La", 64 44 S 61 $ 3 Water Customers 63) 671 660 632 63) (1) Unaudited; cash basis figures prepared by Corporation Olllclals. Wate Su i The Corporation owns and operates tour water wells with a combined pumping capacity of 591 gallons per minute. The Corporation will use their well water as a supplement to water received from the Upper Trinity Regional Water District. The Corporation has four ground storage tanks, Water Rates (Effective April 11 1961) 1 Service Availability $14.00 First 3,000 gallons 2 31 N gallons Nest 22,000 gallons 2.10 /M gallons Neat 23,000 gallons ).13 /M gallons Nat 23,000 gallons 4.30/M gallons Over 230000 gallons 3.30151 gallons Membership Enrollment Cost Membership Fee 130.00 Tap Pee 130.00 System foe !!!1,100.00 Watee Capeumptlon Water Water Fiscal Water Consumption Sells 1963 -Trr- 4, , I 1966 633 31,306,900 194,20) 1967 632 56,399,200 193,160 1916 660 63,420,600 2060043 11119 671 31,467,410 111,3)3 1990 (1) 683 42000),300 1661636 (1) Estimated. (2) Water consumption for eight months only, throu6h August 3i, 1990. r f , i / i I } I I APPENDIX s AFFIDAVIT AS TO ACCURACY OF INFORMATION r I • f j I Qw ~ 1 ~Y LT i STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the TAYLOR State GeneofrTealxas, on Manager of the personally appeared Water District, who, being by me here and now duly sworn, upon oath says: (i) the facts and informatin contained in the Application to the Texas Water Development Board for financial assistance are true and correct to my beat knowledge and belief, and (it) the Upper Trinity Regional Water District will comply with all representations in the Application to the Texas Water Development Board for financial assistance, all laws of the state of Texas and all rules and published policies of the Texas Water Development Board. THOMAS E. TAYLOR, General Manager Upper Trinity Regional Water District SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE Kilt TAYLOR, General Manager of the Upper Trinity Rsaid egional W Water District , this the day of r f~ , 1991. Notary public, State of Texae My Commission Expires: (NOTARY SEAL) 1 I 0532X/1 now, 1 PE D RESOLUTION REQUESTING FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE J I . 'tea it j i I j 1 F t r I UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION by the Board of Directors of the Upper Trinity Regional Water District, Denton County, Texas, requesting financial assistance from the Texas Water Development Board; authorizing the filing of an application for assistancei and making certain findings in connection therewith. WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Upper Trinity Regional Water District hereby finds and determines that there is an urgent need for the District to construct improvements and extensions to its waterworks system and such capital assistance tis obtained from the Texas Water Development financial NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT: CIL SECTION 1. That an application is hereby approved and authorized to be filed with the Texas water Development Board seeking financial assistance in the amount of $22,435,000 to provide for the costs of certain improvements and extensions to the District's waterworks system. SECTION 2. That the Board authorize the filing of e request for financial participation by the Te:as water Development Board in funding the project up to 50% of the total cost of the project, including deferral of debt service for up to 12 years. t SECTION 3. That the Board authorises the filing of such request for financial assistance to include the funding of the cost of engineering recommended by the District financial Advisor, way services if i SECTION 44 That the President be and is hereby designated the authorised representative of the District for purposes of furnishing such information and executing such assistance preparation documents asuch application in foconnection r financial with the and and filing of the rules of the Texas water Development Board. SECTION 5. That the following firms and individuals are hereby authorized and directed to aid and assist in the preparation and submission of such application and appear on behalf r Developments Boardrontsuch application, to witsby the Texas Water ~Y JST'M • I Financial Advisors First Southwest Company Dallas, Texas 75201 Bond Counse": Hutchison Boyle Bro4s & Fisher Dallas, Texas 75201 DULY PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1991. 1 President, Board of Directors Upper Trinity Regional Water District ATTEST: C Secretary, Board of Directors Upper Trinity Regional Water District 6i II s ~E. r2r t GB2GX Cfl • T ~ ➢a V i CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON Is the undersigned, Srar For the Ur Trinity Regional Water Districts Teas®CDOtHEREBY CERTIFY aspfollows: 1. That on the day of 1991, the District's Board of Director convened in regular session at its regular meeting place; the duly constituted members of the Board being as follows; Austin D. Adams, President R.E, Nelson, Vice President Natalie Kelly, Secretary/Treasurer Steven L. Bacchus John Hamilton Mike Eastland A.L, Utesch Ann Pomykal Dean Xshnsy Tom Hsrpool J. Pat Boyd Chris Curtp Jim Karlovitch Conrad Shifflett Johnny Harris I James Thurmond Torn W. Porter F. K. Mullendore Frank Kirk and all of said persone were present at said meeting, except the followings Among other business considered at said meeting, the ittached resolution entitled; "A RZSOLUTION by the Upper Trinity Regional Water authorising assistance the from lling he Texas WatericDevelopmentngBoardl financial an application for assistance1 and making certain findings in connection therewith.* was introduced and submitted to the District's Board for passage and adoption, After presentation and due consideration of the resolution, a motion was made by that the resolution be finally passed and adopted, The motion was seconded by and carried by the following vote= voted 'FOR' voted 'AGAINST' ABSTAINZD 0532X/2 t i F r all as shown in the official Minutes of the Board for the meeting held on the aforesaid date. 2. That the attached resolution is a true and correct copy of the original on file in the official records of District; the duly qualified and acting the members of the District Board of Directors on the data of the aforesaid meeting are those persons shown above and, according to the records of my office, each member of the District's Board was given actual notice of the time, ;lac,a and purpose of the meeting and had actual notice that the matter would be considered; and that said meeting, and deliberation of the aforesaid public business, was open to the public and written notice of said meeting, including the subject of the entitled resolution, was posted and given in advance thereof in compliance with the provisions of Article 6292-17, Section 3A, V.A.T.C.S. i officiallywlandSSaffiExed y,the I have goal of said Districty tname his the day of , 1991, ' Diattic! Socrotsry Upprr Trinity Regional Water District (SEAL] s '2- 0932X/3 r. i APPENDLX 0 PR03ECTEO CASH FLOWS f 1 1. 1 1+ I 1 '77 VF e 1 UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT PROJECTED CASH FLOWS 7 CITY OF CORINTH 1 i FISCAL YEAR REVENUES EXPENDITURES NET REVENUE DEBT SERVICE ENDING AVAILABLE 1912- _-m46 "Tb 46 1993 $702,370 $460,920 $241,450 $193,1660 1994 $804,969 $488,234 $316,735 $253,388 1995 $921,734 $510,820 $316,914 $253,531 1996 $851,013 034,457 $316,556 $253,244 ' 1997 $875,329 $669,670 $3159659 $252,527 1998 $965,322 $5850671 $379,652 $253,101 1999 $1417,684 $612,722 $404,962 $253,101 2000 51483,272 $6419349 $441,923 $252,527 2001 $1,177,754 $671,552 $506,202 $253,101 2002 51423,698 5754,544 $5690155 $252,958 2003 51068,341 5733,796 $634,545 $253,818 2004 521010,810 5167,413 51,243,398 599/,118 i 2005 51,848462 3802,080 51,046,282 5837,026 2006 511884,772 $838,849 51,0451924 $836,739 2007 $19924405 $816,668 $1,041,537 5838,030 2008 $1,9630312 $916,851 $1,046,462 $837,169 2009 $2,005,871 $958,872 31,0/6,999 5837,699 2010 $2,041,221 51,002,131 $1,041,490 5835,592 2011 52,094041 5110481955 $1,045,386 $836,309 2012 $1,821,819 $1,097,017 $730,802 $584,642 2013 $14781865 $1,147,N ' $131,161 $584,929 2014 51,931,050 $101990351 $131,690 $585,359 2015 $1,983,401 51,253,322 $130,085 $564,068 2016 52,040,345 $1,309,122 5130,623 6544,498 2017 $2,099,461 51,368,659 $730,802 1384,642 2016 $2,160,693 51,430,249 f7J0,444 $584,355 2019 $2,226,129 51,494,610 $131,519 $3850215 3 2020 $2,293,381 $1,561,867 $131,519 5586,215 2021 $2,362,416 $1,632,152 $730,265 $584,212 2022 $2,435,325 $141050398 $729,721 $583,181 2023 (2,614,049 $1,182,350 $131,699 $585,359 FISCAL YEAR ENDED, 9.30.92, PAID FROM CAPITALIZED INTEREST First eft Company General Manater Upper Trinity ReBlonal Mater District an ummer an ates r 7 fr',• RMT~ UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT PROJECTED CASH FLOWS CITY OF DENTON i FISCAL YEAR REVENUES EXPENDITURES NET REVENUE DEBT SERVICE i ENDING AVAILABLE 1993 $385,321 $105,321 $280,000 $224,000 1994 $475,562 $111,562 $364,000 $2919200 1995 $485,723 $1169723 $369,000 $295, 0 1996 $489,124 $122,124 $367,000 $293,600 1997 $4929386 $121486 $364,500 $291,600 1996 $5149827 $133,877 $441,000 $294,000 1999 $612,968 f1 M P"- $472,960 $295,600 2000 $656,849 $146,540 $510,300 $291400 2001 $737,451 $153,451 $584400 (292400 2002 $628,514 $172,414 $656,100 $291400 2003 $905,674 $167,674 $738,000 $295,200 2004 $541,355 $175,355 $366,000 $292,800 2005 $551,271 $183,277 $368400 $294,400 2006 $560,178 $191,678 $368,500 $294,800 2007 $567,820 $200,320 $367,500 $294,000 2008 $574,502 $209,502 $365,000 $292,000 2009 $586,104 $2199104 $367,000 $293,600 2010 $6029126 $229,126 $373,000 ;?98,400 2011 $610,188 (2390688 $370,500 $296,400 2012 $250,670 $250,670 $0 2013 $262,252 $262,252 $0 2014 $274,054 $214,054 f0 2015 $2860386 $286,386 $0 2016 $299,274 $299,214 $0 2011 $312,141 $312,741 $0 2018 $326,814 $326,814 to 2019 $341,521 $341,521 f0 2020 $356,889 $356,889 $0 2021 $372,949 $372,949 $0 k 2022 $389,132 $389,732 $0 2023 $401,210 $401,270 $0 rst t weer ompany Upper Trinity Rational Water District an Plummer an Associates S w, r 1 ~ t /Y ♦M1~ , 1 UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT PROJECTED CASH FLOWS CITY OF HIGHLAND YILLAGE i FISCAL YEAR REVENUES EXPENDITURES NET REVENUE DEBT SERVICE ENDING AVAILABLE 1992 $135,562 $0 $1350562 $135,562 1993 $369,757 $2420668 $127,089 $101,672 1994 $423,765 $257,048 $166,716 $133,373 1995 $435,750 $268,939 $166r811 $133,449 1996 $448,006 $281,384 $166,622 $1330298 1997 $460,808 $2941658 $1660150 $132,920 1998 $5080180 $308,347 $199,833 $133,222 1999 $535,745 $322,589 $213,156 $133,222 2000 $570,271 $337,661 $232,610 $132,920 2001 $620x007 $3530562 $266,444 $133,222 2002 $696,836 $3971256 $299,580 $133,147 2003 $720,332 $386,333 $3330999 $133,600 2004 $10058,506 $404,031 $654,475 $523x580 2005 $973,004 $422,283 $550,721 $440x577 2006 $992,174 $441,642 $550,532 $440,426 } 2007 $10012,934 $461,553 $5510381 $4410105 2008 $1,033,524 $482,706 $5500815 $440,652 2009 $1,055,930 $504,832 $551,091 $4400879 2010 0:077,701 $527,929 $549,777 $439,822 2011 $101020509 $552,259 $550,249 $4400199 2012 $962,228 $577,563 $3840665 $3070732 2013 $984:103 $604,250 $364,154 $307,183 2014 $1,016,571 $631:441 5315,137 $308:109 2015 $1:044:143 $654,856 $314,286 $307,430 2016 $1:074,120 $689,549 $384,571 $330707*656 2017 $1,1051244 $720,579 $384,665 4 2018 51,137,481 $753,005 $314,476 53070511 2019 $1,171,933 786,690 314315,:04041 1 $ $308301,034 ,034 2010 $1,2071343 $62 58121,300 2021 1r4, M $1590304 $314,311 307:306 347:179 2021 1:211:071 $197,971 314,099 308:109 2013 $1,3131511 $938,381 315:137 FISCAL YEAR ENDED, 9-30-92, PAID FROM CAPITALIZED INTEREST I Gene, Manapr Iret vest Company Upper TrWty flesiot►sl Water D let i -AW e , Plummer an Woc atee I I , 1 wbu.a.r BYyy UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT PROJECTED CASH FLOWS CITY OF MORTHLAKE FISCAL YEAR REVENUES ENDING EXPENDITURES NET REVENUE DEBT SERVICE 199 2 AVAILABLE 1993 $400661 1994 $1100871 $72,731 $40,661 $40,661 1995 $127,068 $77 062 $380120 $300496 1995 $130,661 $800627 $500006 $400003 1997 $1340336 $84,358 $50034 $40,028 1998 $138,174 $88 337 549,976 $39,982 1999 $152,381 $92,441 $49,836 $390869 ,I1 2000 $160,646 $960711 $390939 $39,960 2001 $1710000 $1010229 $630935 $390960 2002 $1850916 $1050997 $690771 $390869 2003 $2088954 $1190096 $790919 $39,960 2004 $2160003 $115 821 $89,858 $390937 I 2005 $317,435 5121,127 $1001182 $40,073 2006 $291,786 $126,599 $196,308 $1570046 2007 $197,733 $132,402 $165,187 $132,150 2008 $3;„1757 $138,372 $1650131 $132,104 2009 $309,929 $144,714 $1650385 $132,308 2010 +4316,647 $151,347 $1670300 $1320172 2011 $3330173 $158 269 $1650300 $132 240 t 2012 $3300611 $165 565 $1640904 $131 923 2013 $2880530 $1730171 $165,046 $132 036 2014 $296,387 $181152 $115,379 $92 307 2015 $3040824 $1890303 $1150436 $92 349 2016 $3130088 $1970822 117,621 $92 416 2017 $322,078 $206024 118,266 $92 213 2018 $331,406 $316 027 117,331 $92 281 2019 $3410070 2250748 115,379 992 303 2020 $3510399 2350907 1180323 $920256 2021 $3620015 2460722 111,492 9 2 394 2022 3840418 $257,616 1150291 #394 2023 396,844 $269,209 $1130209 19922#235 $281#323 $1150721 $92,167 l'ISCAL YEAR ENDED' 9.30-920 $920416 ► 30-920 PAID MON CAPITALIZED INTEREST 1 Company r uPPor frWty q$jpaI LI D , Wei a~`n ummer an t~oe~ t""'1` ai L~, , r e UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL MATER DISTRICT PROJECTED CASH FLOWS LAKE CITIES MUNICIPAL MATER AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR REVENUES EXPENDITURES NET REVENUE DEBT SERVICE ENDING AVAILABLE 1992 $121j964 $121,904 $121,984 1993 $332,118 $218,417 $114,360 591,488 1994 $381,379 $231,361 $150,018 $1209015 1995 $392,167 $242,064 $150,103 $120,083 1996 $403098 $253,265 $149,933 $119,947 1997 $414,121 $265,212 $149,509 $1190607 1998 $4579352 $211,533 $179,818 $119,879 , 1999 $482,158 5290052 5191406 $119,879 2000 $513,230 $303,918 $209,312 $119,607 2001 $557,988 $318,230 $239,158 $119,879 2002 $627,132 $357,358 $269,514 $119,811 2003 $648,272 $347,126 $300,546 $120,218 2004 $952,579 $363,636 $588423 $471,138 2005 $075,645 $380,084 $495,561 $396,449 2006 $892,899 $397,501 $495,392 $396,313 2007 $911,584 $415,429 $496,156 $3969924 2008 $930,117 $434,470 $495,646 $396,517 2009 $950,284 $454,383 $495,901 $396,721 2010 $9690879 $475,161 5494,112 $395,770 2011 $992,208 $497,071 $495,137 $3969109 2012 $865,983 $519,846 $346,131 $2160910 2013 $8900173 $543,866 $346,307 $211,046 2014 $914,902 $568,340 $346,662 $277,249 2015 $939,713 $593,915 $345,798 216,638 2016 $966,694 $620,641 $346,052 216,842 2017 $994,707 648,570 $346,131 $2760910 2018 $11021,723 1671,766 }346,968 $216,714 2019 $1,0541132 $708,265 3346,417 $271,182 2020 $10086,603 $140,126 $346,477 $211,182 2021 $1,119,314 $113,432 $145,883 $276,106 2022 $1,153,864 $808,236 $3459626 $216,502 2023 $1,1910169 $844,601 $346,662 $211,249 FISCAL YEAR ENDED, 9.30.929 PAID FROM CAPITALIZED INTEREST t rat Company t let Upper Trlnlty Rolloml Water District ~AlanOJMM*t Xiw-clatal r , P ir.. .t + 1 O' UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT PROJECTED CASH FLOWS CITY OF PILOT POINT FISCAL YEAR REVENUES EXPENDITURES NET REVENUE DEBT SERVICE ENDING AVAILABLE 1992 ---TV $2 1993 $73,892 $48,501 $25,391 (20,313 1994 $84,683 $51,375 $33,308 $26,646 1995 $87,078 $53,71$ 533,327 $260661 1995 589,528 $66,239 $33,289 $26431 1997 $92,086 $58,892 $33,195 $26,556 1998 $101,552 $61,627 $39,924 $26,616 1999 $1016060 $64,474 $429586 $26,616 2000 $113,959 $67,486 $46,413 $26,556 2001 $123,897 $70,664 $53,232 $260616 2002 $139,250 579097 $59,853 $26,601 2003 3143443 $77,214 $66,729 $26,692 2004 $211,508 5800151 $1309756 $104,605 2005 $194,421 $84,399 $110,027 $88,021 2006 $198458 $88,268 $109,990 $87,992 2007 $2029407 $92,248 $110,159 $88,128 2008 $206,522 $96,416 $110,046 $88,037 2009 $211,041 5100,898 $110,103 588,082 2010 $215,312 $105,513 5109,839 $816811 2011 $2200310 5110,377 $109,933 $87,947 2012 $1920286 3115,434 $16,851 $61,481 r 2013 5191457 $120,768 $16,889 361,511 2014 $203,148 $126,202 $16,916 361,SS1 2013 $208,657 5131,881 $76,116 $61,421 2016 $214,649 5131,816 $16,833 $61,466 2017 $220,869 $114,018 $76,851 $61,481 2018 $221,312 $150,499 $76,814 $619451 P 2020 $241,275 $164,348 $76,99 7 $7 $61,541 2021 $2481639 5111,144 $76,195 $61,436 2023 $264,494 ${81,549 $14,944 $61,667 FISCAL YEAR ENDED, 9.30.92, PAID FROM CAPITALIZED INTEREST 'eoossal et it omwy r Upper Trwty milwal water District m Plummer wi atel , t r AM.: v n. ' 1 UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT PROJECTED CASH FLOWS + CITY OF SANGER FISCAL YEAR REVENUES EXPENDITURES NET REVENUE DEBT SERVICE ENDING AVAILABLE Sa $135,56 1993 $369,757 $242,66 8 $127,089 $101,672 1994 $423,765 $251,048 $166,716 5133,313 1996 $448,006 5281,384 $166,622 $133,298 1997 $460,808 $294,658 $166,150 $132,920 1996 $508,180 $308,347 $199,833 $133,222 1999 $535,745 $322,589 $213,156 $133,222 2000 $510,271 $337,661 $2320610 $132,920 2001 $620,007 $353,562 $266,444 $133,222 2002 $720,332 $386,333 $333,999 $133,600 2004 $1,0581506 $404,031 $654,475 $5231580 2005 $973,004 $422,283 $550,721 $440,577 2006 $992,174 $4419642 5550,532 $440,426 2001 51,012434 $461,553 $551,381 $441,105 i + 2008 $1,033,524 $482,708 $5500815 $440,652 r 2009 $1,053,930 $504,632 $551,098 $140,879 2010 $1,077,101 $527,923 $5499771 $439,822 2011 $1 1020509 55521259 $550,249 $440,399 2012 1962,228 $577,363 $384,665 $307032 2013 $989,103 $604,250 $364,854 $307,883 2014 51416,578 $631,4/1 f385,331 $307,530 2015 $1,044,143 $659,866 $384 ~ , 2016 $1,074,120 $689,549 $384,571 $307,666 2017 51005,244 $720,$19 384 5 ,666 $307,13 2 2018 11,3379481 $163,005 (384,176 $301,681 2019 $10171,933 $7869890 $386,042 $308,034 2020 $1,201,343 $822,300 $381,042 $308,034 I 2021 1,243,686 $859,304 $384,362 $307,506 2022 $1,282,071 $6970972 $3840099 $307,279 2023 111,323,518 $938,361 $386,137 $308,109 FISCAL YEAR ENDED, 9.30.92, PAID FROM CAPITALIZED INTEREST lrst eet Company Cleneral e Upper TrWty R4wAl 'water D trlct "-`7iIM Plummer an ata 7~ A74'tA UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT PROJECTED CASH FLOWS ARGYLE WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION _ A FISCAL YEAR REVENUES EXPENDITURES NET REVENUE DEBT SERVICE ' ENDING AVAILABLE 1992 $80,010 $0 $800010 1993 $172,010 $97,001 $750009 $0,010 1994 $1920010 $1020749 $89,261 $660,008 1995 $196,847 $107,503 $71,409 1996 $89,345 $71,476 $201,738 $112,477 $89,261 $71,409 1997 $208,378 $1170783 $900595 $720476 1998 $231,268 $1230255 $108,014 $72,009 1999 $243,202 $1280948 $114,254 $71,409 2000 $260,872 $134,973 $125,899 $71,942- 2001 $285,747 $141,329 $144,418 $72,209 2002 $321,265 $158,794 $162,470 $72,209 2003 $334,284 $154,428 $1790856 $71,942 2004 $507,490 $1610503 $345,988 $2760790 2005 $458,251 $168,799 $289,453 $231,562 2006 $466,073 $176,537 $289036 $231,629 2007 $473,282 $184,496 9288,786 231,029 2008 $481,738 $1920952 $288,786 1231,029 2009 $492,749 $201,795 $290,953 $232,762 2010 $501,229 $211,026 $290,203 $232,162 2011 $510,623 $220,754 289,870 $231,896 2012 $430,393 $230,868 1199,525 $159,620 2013 $4410060 $241,536 $199,525 $159,620 t 2014 $451,263 $252,405 $1980858 $159,087 2015 $4620871 $263,763 ,$199,108 $159,287 2016 $475,741 $275,632 $200,108 $160,0$7 2017 $486,560 9268,036 $196,525 $158,$20 2018 000,272 9300,997 1990275 $169 420 2019 $513,400 314,542 198+868 159,067 2020 527,655 328,697 198,$$$ 159,087 2021 542,696 $343,488 1990108 9159 287 2022 $556,366 $356,945 199o442 $159,553 f 2023 $576,372 $375,097 1201,275 $161,020 FISCAL YEAR ENDED, 9-30-92, PAID FROM CAPITALIZED INTEREST i First west company Oonera Manager Upper Trinity Regional water District Alan P amer an ANSOC etas f l `7 1 UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT PROJECTED CASH PLOWS BARTONVILLE WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION A FISCAL YEAR REVENUES EXPENDITURES NET REVENUE DEBT SERVICE ENDING AVAILABLE 1992 $200,010 $0 $200,101 $2000010 1993 $430,177 $242,668 $187,509 $1500008 1994 $4'0,184 $257,048 $223,136 $1780509 1995 $492,284 $2680939 $223,345 $178,676 1996 $504,520 $281,384 $223,136 $178,509 1997 $521,128 $2940658 $226,470 $181,176 1998 $578,361 $308,347 $270,014 $1800009 1999 $608,203 $322,589 $285,614 $178,509 2000 $652,385 $337,661 $314,724 $179,842 2001 $714,580 $353,562 $3610018 $180,509 2002 $803,401 $397,256 $406,145 $1800509 2003 $835,938 $386,333 $449,606 $179,842 2004 $1x266,936 $404,031 $8640904 $691,923 2005 $1,145,861 $4220283 $723,578 $578,862 2006 $1,165,428 $441,642 $723,786 4579,029 j 2007 $10183,464 $461,'553 $721,911 $577,529 2008 $1,204,619 $462,708 $721,911 $577,529 2009 $1,232,160 $504,832 $727,328 $581462 2010 $1,253,376 $527,923 $725,453 $580,362 2011 $1,276,879 $552,259 $724,620 $579,696 2012 $1,076,336 $577,563 $498075 $399,020 2013 $1,1031025 $604,250 498,775 $399,020 2014 $1,128,549 $631,441 497,106 3397,687 2015 $11157,589 $6590836 9497,733 1398,187 2016 $1,189,783 $669,544 $600,233 400,187 2017 $1,216,854 $720,579 $496,275 397,020 2016 $1,251,156 $7530005 $4980150 396,520 ! i 2011 $1,263,998 $786,690 $4970306 397,687 j 2020 $1,319,408 $622,300 $497,108 397,667 2021 $103570037 $659,304 $497,733 $398,167 2022 1103960539 $897,972 $498,567 $396,853 2023 $1,441,531 $936061 $5030150 $4020520 !FISCAL YEAR ENDED, 9-30-92, PAID FROM CAPITALIZED INTEREST 'I f r } - rr out eri company nera sager Upper Trinity Regional i Water District ft an urieer an Associates u 11 0~1 II r UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT PROJECTED CASH FLOWS A ` MUSTANG WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION FISCAL YEAR REVENUES EXPENDITURES NET REVENUE DEBT SERVICE ENDING AVAILABLE 1993 1994 $42,982 $24,250 $18,731 $14,985 1995 $47,978 $25,681 $22,290 $11,832 1995 $49,181 $26,816 $22,311 $17,849 1997 $50,409 $28,119 $22,290 $17,832 1998 $52,069 $29,446 $22,623 $18,099 $57,787 $30,814 $26,973 1999 $60,768 $32,237 $28 $117,982 2000 $65,182 $33,743 ,531 ,832 2001 $71,396 $35,332 $3136,439 $ $171,965 2002 $80,210 $39,699 $,064 $18,032 2003 $83,520 $38,607 $40,572 $18,032 2004 S1M M S $44,913 $11,120 2005 $114,481 $42,200 $72,282 $69,120 2006 $116,437 $44,134 $729303 $57,825 11 2001 $118,239 546,124 $12,115 $5,842 1 2006 $120,353 $48,238 $729115 $577,692 2009 $123,105 $50,449 $72,656 $57,692 2010 $125226 $58,125 2011 $127,574 5519756 $12,469 $57,975 ~ 2012 $107,542 $57$55,,1788 $721386 $510909 2013 $110,209 $60,384 $49,825 $39,860 825 s 2014 $112,760 $63,101 $49,659 $39,721 2015 $115,662 $65,941 $490721 $399177 I 2016 $118,879 $68,908 $49,911 $39,977 2017 5121,584 $720009 $49,515 $399660 2018 $125,012 $75,249 $49,763 $39,810 2019 $1289294 $18436 $49,659 $390727 2020 $131,833 $829174 $49,659 $39,727 2021 $135,593 $851612 $49,721 $39,717 2022 $139,$41 $89,736 549,804 $39,843 2023 $144,037 $93,774 $50,262 $40,210 FISCAL YEAR ENDED, 9.30.92, PAID FROM CAPITALIZEO INTEREST F rat out west Cosipany Genera Manager Upper Trinity Regional Water District 1 Alan P GWe-r an Assoc ates N 9 APPENDIX E JOINT OWNERSHIP AND OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACREEMENT WATER TREATMENT A,NDTRANSMISSION FACILITIES BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT i r £ i i i t s~y A LeMond Architects RoberH leMonC FAIA PbS.dZr1 February s, 1991 Jim Alexander City Council City of Denton Municipal Building 215 McKinney 4 Denton, Texas 76201 Rei Agenda Item 4.A CJ Zoning Case 8-90-015 Dear Mayor Castleberry and Members of the City Council, Representing the buyer and seller in the referenced zoning matter before you tonight, we respectfully request post- poning and continuing the public hearing on this case until the next regularly scheduled City Council Meeting for such purposes. It is our understanding that date is February 19. We appreciate your consideration of our request. Thank you, Yours truly, t Robert H. Le)Mond, FAIA /hs s cci J. Newton Rayzor jS Don F. Holt, M.D. 7 Roger D Nunn, M.D. Mike Griffin Rent Ferguson t Lloyd V, Harrell Rick Svehla Frank H. Robbins Karen K, Fesharl t I kchitecwro Penovat" Urtan Planning t3raphga L~Mond AuWiatea McARaota P.0 Bog 10688 ~ WoFlh, Teaaa 76185 E1 jry~,~ REFERENCE MATERIALS SOLID WASTE ALTERNATIVES CITY COUNCIL MEETING E FEBRUARY 1991 d SOURCE! COMMUNITY SERVICES • SERVICE CENTER . 1991 t Ni TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Page A 1 M340 TO COUNCIL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 12 APPENDIX A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Commercial Options Summary Table . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 - 15 Residential Rate Graphs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Cumulative Revenue Gain Graph - Sale Options. . . . . . . 17 c'. Cumulative Revenue Gain Graph - Retain Options. . . . . . 18 Net Present Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 APPENDIX B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Code Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Analysis Asstenptions. 22 - 23 Scenario I Proforma (CS-LA-DH) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 - 29 Scenario 1A Proforma (CS-LC-TS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 35 Scenario 2 Proforma (CS-LC-DH) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 - 41 Scenario 3 Proforma (CS-LC-LE). . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . 42 - 47 Scenario S Proforma (CRD-LC-LE) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 - 53 Scenario 6 Proforma (CR-LC-LE). . . . . . . . . . . . 54 - S9 Scenario 8 Proforma (CRE-LI-LE) 60 - 65 1 i IA2/010991028A i ' i k c.K 4 ~ TO: THE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FRCM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager DATE: January 31, 1991 SUB,IECI: BID #1181 - SALE OF THE CCNERCIAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SYSTEM RECOtE TION: Should the decision be made to sell the c which the City maintains constant landfilly o rumeslthsstem, then rough closure cina19962and then hauls its waste to the DFW landfill appears to be the most appropriate course of action. Should the decision be made to retain the commercial system then it is recommended that Scenario 80 which will franchise of the commercial and residential serviced in Denton,t bees r~ongly considered since it results in either the highest cumulative revenues and net present value or in the lowest residential rates. SUMh41RY/BACKGROUND After the presentation to Council on January J refine the numbers contained in the various sc narIos9included incSolid Waste 1o staff nued to Alternatives Reference Materials Report. The refinements are basically limited to the selection of one residential rate for all scenarios (except Scenario 5) so that the financial comparisons could be made on the basis of Net Present Value (NM or cumulative revenues. Also, the analysis time frame was extended from the year 2000 to 2005 so that the effect of developing a new landfill in r 2003 could be shown, Once the refinements were completed, staff conducted an analysis of the alternatives on a comparative basis, Based our analysis we were able to eliminate Scenario upon #q' from serious consideration as neithrrCo f th seE)oppations proidU ed desirable results. Staff also developed a Scenario 014 which is derived from hCe-origii.. nal Scenario 2 (CS-LC-TS) and incorporates additional provisions offered by Texas Waste Management ( j In essence, Scenario 1A (CS-LC-TS) involves the sale of the commercial system, accelerating the filling of the landfill and disposing of waste through a TwM stati trvaa ee pits ato the l diti rally, he City would fill only the currently ex-action would allow for the premature closingtof theilandfillaIn October, 1992. TW has offered the City $1.2 million in exchange for the premature closure of the landfill and the execution of a fifteen year contract with TwM for use of the TWM transfer station at a fee not to exceed $6,00 per yard with the standard CIP escalation clause. A comparative analysis of this alternative and the other scenarios is included in the following tables and graphs. IA2/IAl/020991028/43 1 1 The basic scenarios are as follows: 1 1. SCENARIO 1 (CS-LA-DII) Sell the Commercial System, accelerate filling of the landfill and close the landfill and rent ul residential waste. 2. SCENARIO IA (CS-LC-TS) Sell the Commercial System, continue present volume in the landfill until the end of FY 1992 and t en aul to transfer station. 3. SCENARIO 2 (CS-LC-DH) Sell the Commercial System, continue present volume in the landfill until closure in 1996 and then erect haul to the DFW Ian3Fi 1n Lewisville. t 4. SCENARIO 3 (CS-LC-LE) Sell the Commercial System, continue present volume in the landfill until closure in 1996 and t esTn a and the landfill. 5. SCENARIO 5 (CRD-LC-LE) 0 Retain the Commercial System. Decrease Customer Base by 21 per year. ! nt ue present volume in the landfill until closure in 1996 and t eMi n expand the landfill. I 6. SCENARIO 6 (CR-LC-LE) Continue on our present course and Main t e commercial system and confffue present vo ume in the landfill, expan, t e landfill when necessary, pro ably 1996. 7. SCENARIOS CRE-LI-LE Retain the comercial system as exclusive, slightly increase indfill volumes w t additional commercial and expand the ja-Y dF ;ITTien `necessary, probably in 1996. 1A2/IAl/010991028/44 2 . VIM] i SCENARIO I is where Denton sells the system operatic as soon as possible, hauls residential o waste toe he dfDFW landfill, and retains the residential collection system. The result is as follows: (YEAR) 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 RATES 9.95 9.95 9.95 10.15 10.80 11.35 12.00 12.95 13.85 14,85 ' ANN. REV. 622 1087 1284 (529) (160) (260) (260) (212) (112) 12 LIC. FEE 0 0 0 0 48 102 159 219 227 235 (YEAR) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 RATES 15.85 16,25 16.75 17,25 17,65 1 ANN. REV. 21 32 63 93 99 LIC. FEE 243 252 261 270 279 i? r Net present value of annual revenue funds is: $105460000 NOTE: Net present value is the amount of money you would need today, which, if you invested at 733 interest, would provide cash revenues equal to the Annual Revenue amounts. y~ The main a_ _ antaAes of Scenario 1 are: 1) a. The City of Denton would receive $1.9 million for the Commercial system, y b. Denton can relieve itself of the very uncertain liabilities of d being in the landfill business. c. The commercial customers would have the option to choose among the various private haulers operating in Denton, d. The City would receive license fees equal to 81 of gross commercial revenues after 1997 which in 2005 equals $279,000, e. D enton's residential rates would hold steady at $9.95 until 1994 and then would in an e 4.r ear. and stabilize there atc$17.65 perayeaSwith9estimated 3.5yto041 Cp increases thereafter. IA2/lAl/010991028/45 3 I M WWI, The disadvantages are: a. The rate to be charged to landfill contract customers was set at 53.45 per cubic yard. Texas Waste Management has expressed reluc- tance to pay this rate for use of the City landfill. The staff does not feel that enough waste can ba directed to the City land- fill to fill it up by 1993 because of the reluctance of Waste Management. The City Council could exercise its option to require all private haulers licensed in Denton to take all waste collected ' in Denton to the City landfill, this would only generate approxi- mately 448,000 cubic yards of waste per year and would not be adequate to fill up the City landfill by the end of 1993. i b. Denton would no longer serve as the competitive benchmark price for commercial collection systens or as a standard of service. The private free enterprise market would ,,at the prices. C. Denton would no longer serve as a benchmark for competitive land- fill prices in the area. The private free enterprise market and the City of Farmers Branch landfill would set the prices. However, if landfill prices get too far out of what is determined a fair price, the Upper Trinity Regional Water District could install a landfill and provide that competitive benchmark price, d. Denton's residential fees are estimated to be more with this scenario than with the landfill expansion scenarios. However, substantial uncertainty exists on costs and liabilities of future landfill expansions. Because of the City's inability to generate enough waste to fill up the landfill by 19930 this is not a viable scenario. SCENARIO 1A is where commercial is sold, the landfill is closed at the end of TV- 11M, Teaving approximately four acres unexcavated and unused to allow ' closure prior to implementation of Subtitle D. Waste Management pays the City $1,2 million to enter into a 1S-year agreement for the City to bring its residential waste to a transfer station to be constructed in or near Denton. The result is as follows: IA2/IAl/010991028/46 4 t 4 tSyw. , . ' y sw.<n~ "r (YM) 1991 1992 1993 1994. 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 RATES 9.95 9.95 9.95 10.15 10.55 11.35 12.00 12.95 13.85 14.85 ANN- REV. 129 420 1017 871 658 446 204 28 (72) (60) ~ LIC. FEE 0 0 0 0 68 102 159 219 227 23S (YEAR) Z001 2002 2003 2004 2005 RATES 15.85 16.25 16.75 17.25 17.65 ANAL. REV. (S1) (46) (26) 5 21 LIC. FEE 243 252 261 270 279 Net present value of annual revenue funds is: ($1000.00) The advantages are: a. Denton gets out of the landfill business prior to the implementa- a tion of Subtitle D. b. The City receives $1.2 million in addition to funds for the sale of Commercial. C. The commercial customers would have the option to choose among any of the private haulers operating in Denton. d. The City would receive license fees equal to 81 of gross commercial revenues which equals $279,000 in 2005. i The disadvanta es are: a. The $1.2 million which would be paid to the City would be re- captured by haste Management in the tipping fee to be charged to the City which begins at $6.00 per cubic yard. The City would also have to agree to a 15-year contract with Waste Management for use of the transfer station, b. Waste Management is reluctant to pay $3.4S per cubic yard for disposal at the City landfill. c. Initial accumulated net gains are depleted as the residential system loses money from 1996 through 1999. IA2/IAI/010991028/47 5 1 0 4 " SCENARIO 2 is where Denton sells the commercial system, continues to fill the TaH-UT1 at present rates, and begins hauling residential waste to the DFW lan een escalate to dfill equipment Residential staff is full. needed for hauling to, landfills reflect when the Effects are as follows: (YEAR) 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 RATES 9.95 9.95 9.95 10.15 10.55 11.35 12.00 12.95 13.85 14.65 ANN . F FE 149 0 0 356 209 340 317 351 102 (159) (219) (227) 235 LIC. (YEAR) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 RATES 15.85 16.25 16.75 17.25 17.65 J~ ANN. FEE 243 252 261 270 289 Net present value of annual revenues is: $101350000 The adva•ita es are: a. The City of Denton would receive $1.9 million for the Commercial system. b. The accumulative revenue reaches $3.36 million by 2005, $1,135,000 present value. c. License fees for general government total $2790000 per year by ? 2005. d. The uprivate customers haulers opewould have the rating in Dentration to choose among the various e. The City goes out of the landfill business in 1996. The disadvantages are: a. Denton would no longer serve as the competitive benchmark price for commercial ree t on systems market would set the priceof service. The private f enterprise b. Denton cliability for several more ~ years1996, thus extend- ing its landfill I 1A2/lAl/010991028/48 6 l s! ■ 4kk +I SCkMIO 3 is where the commercial system is sold, the volumes received at the an i remain at status quo levels and future disposal of waste is handled by expanding the landfill. The expanded landfill fills up in 2003 and is replaced by a new landfill. Effects are as follows: (YEAR) 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 RATES 9.95 9.95 9.95 10.15 10.55 11.35 12.00 12.95 13.85 14.85 ANN. REV. 149 356 200 348 317 350 449 280 385 S14 LIC. FEE 0 0 0 0 48 102 159 219 227 235 (YEAR) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 RATES 15.85 16.25 16.75 17.25 17.65 ANN. REV. 524 534 561 461 756 LIC. FEE 243 252 261 270 279 Net present value of annual revenue funds is: $3,296,000 The advantages are: a. The City of Denton would receive $1.9 million for the Commercial system. a b. The accumulative net gain reaches $9.7 million by 2005 with a # present value of $3.2 million. c. General government receives license fees of $279,000 per year by 2005. The disadvantages are: a. The City continues in the landfill business until approximately 2033, with all of the attendant liabilities. b. The City would be exposed to criticism if residential rates must increase more than projected due to factors we are presently not aware. lA2/lAl/010991028/49 7 S V l p Q , J/ r SCENARIO 5 is where Denton continues in the commercial business with a 24 per year ecrease, in the customer base. The landfill continues as-is and is expanded in 1996. In 2003, a replacement landfill is developed. Effects are as follows: (YEAR) 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 RES. RATE 9.9S 9.95 9.95 10.15 10.55 11.35 12.00 1 COM. RATE 115.55 11939 123.78 132.59 137.23 142.04 149.14 I ANN. REV. 12 (73) (99) (68) (135) (97) (320) Cc: (YEAR) 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 RES. RATE 12.95 13.85 14.85 15.85 16.25 16.75 17.25 17.6S COM. RATE 149.14 15639 164.42 172.65 181.28 190.34 199.86 209.85 ANN. REV. (255) (204) (133) (68) (134) (191) (142) (523) Net present value of annual revenue funds is: ($1,236,000) , The advantages are: a. Denton continues with commercial operations. b. Denton provides a competitive factor in setting of landfill rates. The disadvantages are: a. Substantial losses occur which would result in the need to signifi- cantly increase rates. The probatie net effect of which would be that residential customers subsidize the commercial operation. b. Denton continues in the landfill business until 2035 with all the attendant liabilities. c. There would be no funds from selling commercial, d. As the commercial customer base erodes, the les! the system is worth in terms of selling it in the future. I lA2/SAl/010991028/50 8 M • Y! 1 1 SCE 'WIG 6 is where Denton continues in our present mode, competing with Tr Vlll1 Maulers in the commercial collection system, continuing to provide residential collection service, and continuing to operate the landfill. She landfill is expanded in 1996 and a new landfill is developed in 2003. Effects are as follows: (YEAR) 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 RES. RATE 9.95 9.95 9.98 1210 8.11 132.59 137.23 142.0 CCM. RATE 115.55 55 119.59 123. ANN. REV. 12 (60l) (20) 58 53 172 41 0 13 26 41 L1C. FEE 0 i (YE) 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 j RES. RATE 12.95 13.85 14.85 15.85 16.25 1916.75 17.2$ 17.65 0.34 199.86 209.85 COI. RATE 149.14 156.59 164.42 172.65 181.28 ANN. REV. 2594 375 S72 777 862 9673 4 8642 7 1023 ~ I LIC, FEE Net present value of annual revenue funds is: $2,4959000 She advents es are: a. Denton keeps on status quo. b. Denton provides a competitive factor in the setting of landfill rates and commercial rates in the area. c. Cumulative gains reach 7.4 million by 2005 which could be used to reduce residential The disad~ t are: a. Residential Yates could increase if competition continues to erode Denton's commercial customer base. b. She City will continue to be liable for the landfill. I c. The City will not receive the funds from the sale of the commercial a system. LA2/IAl/010991028/S1 9 f r• , CT ear in license fees in d, The City would only receive $58+11D0 seem is sold. 2000 vs $235,000 if the confinersubstantial criticism if residential would be exposed to ncrease than projected due to e, The City or commercial rates musi sentl}'rot aware. factors of which we are p approximately 2033 f, The City remains in the landfill business until with all the attendant liabilities' whether Denton's share of the i There is also substantial uncertainty as to e to decline. A basic continu constant or that Denton my continue to lose commercial customers will remain po to the remaining commercial and was premise ofd thisC wouldi drive rthe ncost up over whether customers, Denton has the least wculdrehooseto subsidize ctommerl residential customers. less neral are taxsrevenues,the City commercial customers cial rates with g i 1- wherein Denton would become the SWAG recommendation, Denton k SCENARIO 8 is essentially ercial solid waste collection in Denton. t e exc usive provider of comet and Den a new landfill site with s f lloweson1d expand tel y e 1996dand would .lid develop would continue to collect ill in approxima results ar the le expectancy in 2003. The 30+ years rs life exp 2004 1993 1994 1995 199G 1___- 97 ] 113.8 r ~ g5 13.85 14.8 1991 99 (YEAR) 0 55 ]1,35 12. 9 04 12468 bT40 912 1 15 10 465 266 0 0 RATES 9.95 9.95 10. 0 ~ ANN. REV, 12 (12) 0 (20 130 324 0 -66 tic. FEE TOTAL. y I CU UTATIVE (W/O L1C1 FEE ]2 1 (28) 108 440 938 1274 1838 2650 3761 W/7% 1NI') 003 - (YEAR) -21 2' 002 2-- 2004 ' 2005 LiATES 15.85 16.25 16.75 17.25 17.65 14464 64 1240 1509 1164 1300 0 0 . ~ MBS 0 M -T_MW -M LTOTA ~ -n" -M CUAULAT1VF (W/O LIC. FEE 5207 6897 8878 10841 13163 W/7t 1NI) of annual revenue funds is: $49447 Net present value 10 1A2/LA1/010991028/S2 advanta es .tre: in Cumulative revenue through The main 13.16 million chosen from Scenario lA. system generates $ City for any purpose desired. The with the residentia l rates a. 2005 the year utilized by the lower than for any tly These funds could be lfican55 can be kept sign return. S if the City desired less net land- b of The the other ther res scenario h a City-owne ' Th d needs are provided throng City's disposal ears. rates in c. the fill for the next 30 yea rice forand landfill rates in benchmark P com¢nercial d, Denton mam serve maintains as a control of residential and area the City. es are: with the landfill The disadvanta City prolongs its liability dfill option by 2003. 3The another fan option develop to choose any other b. Denton would have to rs ,,,ould not have the co Commercial custosme iron, the i hauler than the City. funds av would ailable forego the 51.9 million of d. Denton stem. collection i sale of the system, ,Popular with private would be teTY and some local businesses, This app Chroachamber of Commerce, the private I e' firms, the the City from potential for litigation against There is outlined 1n this report, collection firms. r. on of the most viable scenarios { the cO of control of does the Based upon concluded the following and our lack wor See' k, staff staff has _at Given the uncertainty this scenario CS-~'~ the landfill to make ~ ario ne ed waste vo u ° that this option is viable the additional $1.2osts due million to th ~ by not feel 45 . Although in dispo csal own landfill raft si~fifi- TS Mos CSt~ , the increase view this 1 Scenario 1A ,00 peT cubic yard r appears very attr-act ve, funds and result doeshenott fee of $6 fete those staff station tipp ing will rapidly deplete Therefore, t increases in residential rates. can alternative as viable. t 1A211A1/010991028153 Scenario 2 CS-LC-DH) - This scenario appears to be the most advantageous when cons eying residential rates, net gain, and the reduction of landfill liabil- ity. It also leaves open the option to expand the landfill in 1995-96 if competitive tipping fees appear excessive. j Scenario 3 (CS-LC-LE) - While this scenario appears to be advantageous relative to residential rates and net gain, it still includes potential for extending the City's liability in terms of the landfill. Since this Scenario 3 is the same as Scenario 2 except for the 1995-96 landfill expansion, the decision to expand can be delayed for three or four more years. Scenario 5 (CRD-LC-LE) - This scenario assumes that the City will lose 21 of its cconerc a customers per year and, therefore, reflects the worst possible circumstances the City could suffer under the retain commercial scenarios and is included for reference purposes only. Scenario 6 (CR-LC-LE) - This scenario appears to be the most advantageous among tTia reta n commercia scenarios in terms of residential rates, net gain, and providing a long term disposal option. However, this scenario carries with it I the risks reflected in scenario 5 and the prolonging of landfill liabilities. Scenario B CRE-LI-LE) - This scenario gives the total solid waste franchise to t~ ty an, wFile this scenario is by far and away the most advantageous of all the scenarios in terms of financial performance and long term disposal options it has numerous negative political ramifications which may eliminate the viability of this option. Should you have any comments or questions on this matter, please let us know, Respectful submitted, v t.o~ Lloyd e 3 City Manager s Prepared by: i f gffF` ige'lo C,- Y Director of Community Services Approved by: e son Executive Director of Utilities Attachments: Appendix A - Summary, Tables Appendix B - Graphs, Proformas lA2/IA£/010991028/54 12 I 1 p ya. it - r / I r r APPENDIX A ~ . 1 - ~j 1. Summary Table - Commercial Options 2, Residential Rate Graph 3. Cumulative Revenue Gain Graph - Sale Options 4. Cumulative Revenue Gain Graph - Retain Options S. Net Present Value - Year 2000, Year 2005 11~ 1 13 1 y r, t I Jy 1I P I ■I A CODE, CR - COMM RETAIN LID - LANDFILL DECREASE FILL LE - LANDFILL EXPANSION CS - COMM SOLO LC -LANDFILL CURRENT FILL LI - LANDFILL INCREASE CAD-C WAN DECREASE LA- LANDFILL ACCEL ERATE FtL L DH - DIRECT HAUL C RE - C RETAIN EXCLUW4 COMMERCIAL OPTIONS 1191 1004 Im 1001 ISIS ISIS 1007 1101 19W RON 4001 1002 too$ :094 loos SCENARIOI RESRATE 006 096 SOS 1019 1066 11.76 1200 1206 Isis 1416 Isis 1121 +e 7/ 1726 I7.eI COANARAIE 11466 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CS-IA-0H ANN Dryt.) R 612 1,011 1,281 1529) (300) (210) 12647 12121 II12) I! at 32 e! as of i NPV INTEREST 0 41 132 338 Pie top 204 109 119 tab III 239 teo 114 sit J000 $1,422 CUM GAL) R 622 1,76[ 3,171 1.160 2.710 Via 2.650 2.141 VS3 1.$" 3,163 3,164 3,717 4,144 2001 $1,14e Lk FEE 0 3 0 0 /8 4,611 112 ISO 111 127 236 243 262 NI 210 !7! AD TRANS C 33 3 a o 0 0 0 o a o o a 0 0 9 AD TRANS L to A, 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCENARIO IA RE$RATE 906 eO1 005 10.18 1015 1136 1200 It 06 111 is 1416 18.18 16.16 1e16 At6 1>.e6 COMM RATE 11668 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A CS-LC-TS ANN GAL) R 120 111 m (2221 (270) (tel) (270) (191) (101► 1t ! 1 20 31 Is NPV INTEREST a to 31 74 IS 40 33 16 P j 12000 ($32) CUMaw R Its 420 1,017 111 S61 446 104 PI 0 0 0 0 0 0 2) ea 61 !t 2000 o) (i1) VC FEE 0 0 0 0 11 102 160 !t0 427 226 !q 167 ter I P/0 !70 I AD TRANS C 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a p AD TRANS L 20 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCENARIO2 RES RATE 996 906 0.18 10.18 10.66 1736 12.0 12.04 0386 11.16 16.16 1.16 We 1711 17.06 $ COMM RATE 11616 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CS-1.10-01.1 ANN 0!4 R 140 364 too 311 317 361 !IS) (243) (146) a 14 t6 /8 N 11 NPV INTEREST 0 11 so 67 N 117 161 Too 141 140 160 173 145 101 t3J 4000 1-37 CUM Dgl) R Ala 61e 744 1,169 1,601 t,031 1,064 1,010 1,11! t,13f 1,311 11110 2,163 2,943 SAN Ims~ 11196 LICFEE 0 0 0 0 15 of 164 tip t27 164 949 !87 !01 !70 in AD TRANS C 33 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a AD TRANS L 29 30 32 34 30 3e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCENARIO3 FIE$PATE 666 Los 0.0$ 10.16 10.48 1131 12.0 it 06 Ills 14 to Iete lots 1911 11.26 11.61 COMM PATE Ila.IS a 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CS-IC-LE ANN Go" R 146 361 400 341 317 $50 UO 200 s/I 14 S24 81 641 /s1 741 NPV INTEREST 0 11 K 67 N 111 142 it? 133 too 730 404 474 164 1 1000 1,191 CUMOKL) R 149 Sig 766 1,180 1,603 RIO" 1,01 3,100 3.726 4,611 6,394 I In AA! 7,317 8,170 1,104 2006 e,ua lI0 FEE 0 0 0 0 N IOt 100 !16 427 138 313 !O! !e1 !70 AD TRANS C 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 a AD TRANS L H 30 39 34 >e 38 40 43 46 N 6t so SO o3 64 y t i CODE'. CR -COMM RETAIN LD - LANDFILL DECREASE FILL LE - LANDFILL EXPANSION CS-COMA} SOLD LC - LANDFILL CURRENT FILL V - LANDFILL INCREASE CFO-C RETAINDACREASE LA- LANDFILL ACCELERATE FILL ON-DIRMTHAL& CRE - C RETAIN EXCLU9NE COMMERCIAL OPTIONS ,K1 1109 ,903 1$44 1608 1/06 ,967 ,199 low 1000 2001 "m 1003 1001 1006 W"AF105 REeRATE 900 0o5 9o$' 10.16 1014 JIM 11o0 Itos 13.08 }4./e less lets 1676 1708 1Ja COMM RATE 116,56 110.64 123.71 120,11 122.14 131.!3 142.04 140.14 I14.a 181.42 172.06 111,!/ 19041 146.84 200.16 f CFO--LC-LE ANN GAL) R 1! (73) (00) (a) (1061 (97) (320) (256) (304) (13M {a) (13p 4101) (142) (623) j NPV INTEREST 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 (/MI cum &W R 1! (00) (160) (227) OR (770) (1.0341 41,134 13711 1, 1.67 119.411111 9006 1,136) LIC FEE 0 0 0 0 13 08 11 64 14 a a a 44 07 a j AD TRANS C h 70 73 n I2 01 44 100 100 113 41 106 137 IN I&I AD TRANS L a 30 32 34 so a 40 43 46 49 32 14 If 57 01 1~ , tjI 8GENAR108 We RATE 0.96 9,96 1,05 10.13 10,66 11.30 1!100 12.95 13.15 14,15 16/6 laid 1676 1J15 IJa 1 COMM RATE 116.66 119.60 123.78 121.11 132.69 137.23 112.04 14914 114.14 164.42 172.06 111.26 110.44 108,80 lOO,86 CR-LC-LE ANN D!(L) R 11 (01) (20) 14 63 172 41 200 37d 372 777 086 973 049 1022 NPV INTEREST 0 1 0 0 0 3 10 91 36 a 117 114 103 265 N5 I1000 746CUM w" R 11 (H) (60) 10 43 111 17d 505 011 1,0a 91467 1,102 1,727 6,414 7,403 1 1006 2,406 LIO FEE 0 0 0 0 13 25 41 44 14 a a a 44 17 K AD TRANS C 01 70 73 7T ft a 04 100 la 111 121 129 137 144 IN AD TRANS L 90 30 32 34 a a 40 43 44 49 62 b5 IS a a SCENARIOS RES RATE 1.06 0.9e 004 10.16 1065 11.38 1200 Iles 13116 14.08 16.16 1426 10.76 1J,85 1708 OOMMIRATE 116,14 $7.06 100.46 }0.T.a }07.00 111,87 116.17 11113 117.04 133.44 140,11 147.11 108.4 7 208.!1 176.40 CRE-L}-LE ANN $Jp.) R_ 12 (12) (29) 136 324 408 206 408 074 012 1,144 1,300 1,444 IAW 1,040 NPV INTEREST 0 1 0 0 1 33 To as la IN al no 517 408 Me t 1000 1,083 cum a*) R If 1 24 104 410 931 1.974 1.839 9.080 Vill 107 4,1$7 5,473 16.141 13,140 20011, 4,447 LID Fula _0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 AD TRANS C - 87 a 101 toe 113 120 123 127 144 lab 108 144 114 101 114 AD TRANS I. to 30 32 34 30 u 40 43 46 40 a 14 AS 03 a fi ~ I I i a{ R , RESIDENTIAL RATE RETAIN OR SALE 20 0 Js j a a H 10 { M / a 0 A I I _ Im low Im Im INS Is" low ls" Im m m mmm 2008 i 14 t `I CUMULATIVE REVENUE GAIN COMMERCIAL SALE OPTIONS 15 i 10 to cl) r Z V Q b I { I .b 1001 16A2 1003 1064 ,965 ,AYE 1A67 ,006 1060 2000 2004 2002 2003 2001 2006 _ CS-LC-TS CS-LC-DH CS-LC-LE SCENARIO IA SCENARIO 2 SCENARIO 3 . CUMULATIVE REVENUE GAIN COMMERCIAL RETAIN OPTIONS ' 15 f 10 /A / r~ cl) z . O o .I -16 -5 1091 ,992 1993 1994 1986 ,BBB ,807 1998 1989 2000 400, 2= 1003 1001 2M CRD-LC-LE CR-LC-LE CRE-LI-LE SCENARIO S SCENARIO B SCENARIO B rri 1 . i~ 1 NPV COMPARISONS YEAR 2000 & YEAR 2005 5 1 4 i 3 { 2 G ~A 1 a O 0 .2 SCENAR101A 9CENAA102 SCENAR03 SCENARI05 SCENARIO! 9CENAR106 .3 CS-LC-TS CS-LC-DH CS-LC-LE CRD-LC-LE CRT LE CRE-U-1..E ~ yr .4 .5 ® YEAR 20x1 ® YEAR 2005 .,e..... ,n a. w.i,.fa i. HrTr~u:: q•iafilWli~• 1 1 ~ r r i +w i 1 r i t q 't I t r~ i , 1 ~ APPENDIX B 9 r 1. Cede Definitions 2. Anolysis Assmptions 3. Scenario 10 CS-LA-DH Proforma 4. Scenario LA, CS-LC-TS Proforma 5. Scenario 2, CS-LC-DH Proforma 6. Scenario 31 CS-LC-LE Proforma 7. Scenario 5, CRD-LC-LE Proforma 8. Scenario 6, CR-LC-LE Proforma 9. Scenario 8, CRE-LI-LE Proforma i 20 ! w t 1 t r I Code Definitions CR Commercial Retain CS Commercial Sold ! i CRD Comm.Retaln Decreased CRE Comm.Retain Exclusive LD Landfill-Dec. Fill Rate LC Landfill-Current Fill Rate LA Landfill Accelerate" f LE Landfill Expansion LI Landfill Increase DH Direct Haul Solid Waste Options January 1991 21 M~4y{.d 4 ANALYSIS ASSUMPTIONS o COMPETITION KEEPS COMMERCIAL RATES LOW o MAIN CONCERNS C -Keeping Residential Rates Reasonably Low -Availability of a Local Disposal Site -Landfill Liability 1 o ;1000,000 PAYMENT ' I -;3000000 to Restricted Assets (Get back when landfill closes) -;180,000 to cover 1991 contingencies (may be too high) -;40,000 to cover accrued vacation -;1,180,000 invested at 81 interest -Interest + =3184001year Credited to residential ratepayers 0 IN ALL SCENARIOS, RESIDENTIAL RATES ARE INCREASED 80 THAT THE RESIDENTIAL COLLECTION SYSTEM IS A BREAK EVEN OPERATION. 1 IN SOME CASES, HOWEVER, ACCUMULATED REVENUE IS USED SO THAT RATES DON'T FLUCTUATE DRAMATICALLY Up ' AND DOWN, BUT INSTEAD, MAINTAIN A STEADY 3 TO 61 PER YEAR INCREASE. x~ i3 A 22 M2 M t 1*YiFti. p +y■ J\ r ANALYSIS ASSUMPTIONS 0 ALL LANDFILL b COMMERCIAL COLLECTION SYSTEM PROFITS AND DEFICITS ARE TRANSFERRED TO RESIDENTIAL TO BE USED FOR RATE STABILIZATION OR REVENUE GENERATION. o D/FW LANDFILL RATES -$2.50/CU. YD. IN 1991 -Escalates at 5% per year 0 TRANSFER STATION COSTS WERE QUOTED TO BE $6.00/CU,YD IN J 1991, WITH ESCALATION ESTIMATED AT 5% PER YEAR. 0 DIRECT HAUL INCREMENTAL COST IS CONSERVATIVELY ESTIMATED AT $3.50 TO $3.70 PER CU.YD. IN 1991. WHEN ADDED TO THE $2.50 PER CU.YD. TIPPING FEE AT D/FW LANDFILL, THIS COMPARES WITH j THE $6.00/CU. YD. TRANSFER STATION) THEREFORE ANALYSES WERE DONE USING THE DIRECT HAUL COST, WHICH IN 1994 IS $4.29/CU.YD., PLUS THE ESTIMATED $2.89/CU,YD. TIPPING FEE (i.e. ($2.50/cu.yd 1991 escalated @ 53/year), FOR A COMBINED DISPOSAL COST OF $7.18/CU,YD. o DENTON LANDFILL RATE INCREASES AS FOLL0WSo -From $3 to $3.45/CU. YD, IN 1992 and holds there ' until 1997 k -Increases to $4.75/CU. YD. for contract haulers o KEEP RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL LANDFILL RATE KEPT ATI -$3.05/0. YD. until 1997 -Increase to $4.75/CU. YD BY 2000 -Expanded Landfill is break even at $4.75/CU. YD. J In 2000 0 EXPANDED LANDFILL -Will have 31500,000 cubic yards of space -$3,500,000 cost to open -Bonds Used to Finance I i -Debt Service Based on 7.54 i 7 year payback I I r~ r 1 G. V + r I SCENAR2<~ 1 E ~ j E f i f 1 ~f a f 1 2 r~ 1 1 i i s CODE, CR - COMM RETAIN LD -LANDFILL DECREASE FILL LE - LANDFILL EXPANBION CS- COMM MSOLD LID - LANDFILL CURRENT FILL LI - LANDFILL INCREASE CPO - C RETAIN DECREASE LA - LANDFILL ACCELERATE FILL CH - DIRECT HAUL C RE - C RETAI N EXCLUSIVE COMMERCIAL OPTIONS 1811 1656 1663 1004 1106 1008 1607 1181 Ind 2000 2001 2009 2007 2004 9406 ` 806NAR101 RE$ RATE 606 016 096 10,16 ` 10,66 11,36 1200 12 06 13 66 14 96 16 66 14 26 10.76 17 t6 17,66 COMM RATE 116.66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CS-0-014 ANN 04L) R_ 022 1.017 1,164 IDtD I306) 1210) f26H 19t21 jilt) It 11 72 93 Is M NPY INTEREST 0 47 172 231 JIM 100 "4 1191 181 1106 t!1 !76 960 194 612 ' ~1000 1,47! CUM 040 R 6t! 1,781 3,171 9,110 2,700 l 710 9,990 9,641 9,733 11,600 3,113 3.414 VIII 4.164 4,671 i`.w..._.. 6tea LIC FEE 0 0 0 0 41 102 166 216 127 !36 943 981 MI !70 !76 AD TRANS C 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AD TRANS L 29 30 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t 1 i ) i 1 ..~u~' NUW 1MNnnw..e.r~»~., r.... . ♦ . a . - '...y.......... ~ f r i~ A i RES RATE & CURIA REVENUE G/L ~COMM SELL - L.F ACCEL- DIP HAUL ~ 20 15 i r■ u°~1 r/ ~i l u RES RAT!■ m vi 10 -t ■ _ . l 5 ' ■ j c CUM GAINILOSS 5 o r I p -5 1991 1992 1993 1991 f966 1911 1997 1868 1899 2000 2001 2002 2M 2004 2006 1 CS`LA-DH i SCENARIO 1 i 3 i r 0 I i r + II u.u wikuln ~ay~~Aln leawrl • ul tOe:tltla ~ all N Kiwi KI1k 1 It It it 11 If if n n 11 it n n n 11 n kelarlll lilt It"~ .111 Hill NN 1111 INS Hill "!1 SIN IIN IIN INS INt an$ !NI HIS 1141101 aNwl Ml"ttl 111,1!1 141,111 111,011 111,011 IN.aN 131,101 IM,NI IN,N) 141,1}! 101.411 011,141 !Il,k! lu.M! 111,011 "1,111 Ia•111 101,101 t (dig 11111 buN1e1 ILM{ 11.114 n.IN N,a1 11:510 11,115 11,191 11,114 M.II! %.Ill M,1111 01,011 11AN 10,111 141.130 101.411 164,141 j I M IAII lb f CHI I.N 1.11 La LM 1141 L" L" "a 1.1! 1.11 I" La La 1.1{ I.u I.a La IN IQ IVII I cost I.M 1.11 P.11 1.11 1.11 11.11 14.11 1LM it.N N." 11.13 11." 11," ILa 11,1{ Itz 11.11 lt"NII I InIMtId 1x1 11,114 ILIA 414 8.141 1,1)1 1*1 1, IN 6301 1,141 3,1N I'm 1,111 1.101 1. IN 1,111 1,111 1,141 ~ I 711 Weld lido 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S 1 1 1 f f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 f 1 0111111:1 • 11111110 11,911 11,13 WIN 111114 16111 111111 11,111 11.161 9,141 11,114 11,111 61101 11.al 11,141 ",111 14.411 14,111 11141 If Orlin It" N 41 IS 41 N u 11 It it 11 11 11 M M 141 Ill IN ill limit lots 1 11 11 IN II{ III III IN If 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 It IlNethi In I 1 II 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111x4111 he 1 1 IN HJ IdN 11111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIId14111 1 1 IN IN IN III Ill Id Ill IN IN 171 1 1 1 1 1 ' 11 Piker IM Rio I 1 N N II !N 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 / I 1 . It "?N an If,{M 11,111 11,111 II,IM 11.M4 ",NI 0,171 11.Nt ".II! 01.141 11,111 ".141 11.111 IJ.NI 11,111 N,Iq 11,151 1114x11 HN 1HI 701 III! Nil It,ltl 11,1" MAN 13.1" JIM 11,111 91,91 JIM II,NI JIM SLIM 11,111 It NNIIn IN III IN IN to IN IN "1 011 In 111 Nl MI in MI IM IN 1) 11 Aides! MISS ll! 1111 IM IN 141 Ml III Mt 111 la 01I IN W MI III JN N! N Iraqi Its IN M 111 IN 101 !a no N{ 111 NI In Ml IN all, W IN in 711Nnmc1 it 30 71 11 11 M N a 41 N Al M N N N 64 11 k It (wg l I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 11 lot trial 1 1 1 I 1 f 1 1 I 1 1 1 S I 1 1 I ; H Okla 41011414 M III NI 141 N) no MI IN 44 IN 714 111 in 441 NI 4" IN IN M h 011114N0911 a 1 1 N N M M N M M al 11 N 11 N 11 M if 1 H llrtlall twine IN IN IN 101 IN 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111101101 IN 1 I 1 1 I Ill 101 ON IN NI IN NI no IN 111 All SN 11 talk 11111911 0,611 M.117 14411 111111 11.011 11,011 ",ail N,1N 11,011 11 ,Nf 11,111 0.101 ",al ".191 11,"1 14911 N,IN ....N » N rat M 00411IN 171 Ilrll lag 11.141 %ill "0141 final Wool 111441 II1911 I1111 Ott NI IM Ia Jill 1111 too W IM oar un111u It Ilot little N to 111 171 11 IN 111 HI IN {N 111 IN NI of IN IN IN 11 101 trivial 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 M like (rINN 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 I 1 1 1 1 I " Ht N IN law I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H let Ir Will to 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 / J 1 1 1 I 1 j 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f / / 1 1 f 1 1 1 N 111 am Ba lu 11 Ilt nl Its I1 Its IN IN IM IN IN IM IN in IM In In «.N. N, N..N »N» N.N » • ...N. .«.N .N... N«N M 011 N1411M 1111 Id 11,1N 11,041 14191 11.9111 II,IN ".10 11,441 91.111 "An 11.1" 11.111 11.311 11,111 11,111 11,111 0. 111 V, ON Were etase$ 111111 little etles Allies Strait 111111 assets little Same trials islets fame raises 111111 Searle N nr 11111x01!1 111 tlMl 1411 II,011 WIN 1111011 li3ml IIMN Into (11111 Ik"I NI NI IM NI MI M N 11111MI1 61 1 1.111 111 1 a 191 IM IN M IN In IN 101 NI In NI NI Ml a lug NO Ill milli Liu) 1 I in I1.1N ",Ill I1,IM 11,191 11,111 ".a1 11,041 ".IN ".NI IMM 11.164 161" 11,111 Jill" I'll's pb11 r ,141 SaLflI Miss 1,1111 latest assist titles Settle 111101 little easier lees states emlas utrH N Ntttll M 11 111 Till 1.111 (.111 ott 1.111 1.111 1.141 $.In I.IN 1.In 1.011 1.101 CIA 1.111 1.011 I.In I.Jn it 11NIN NI Nil Am 1,121 1.1% 1.014 1.101 IIN 6101 1.111 1.194 1.111 4.111 LAN LIN 1.44 Call 41 oil #N$t4i "IN III NO 11,131 44 MI milli Nil! TO No 11,I4 114 JJ t I r a v' t 1 f ~ n:a::2 Il r 1oer1 ' tl tl N Krlil 9101 to 11 11 If 11 if 11 11 if 11 II It 11 ►1 11 ; laurli I UN It" ltil IIII lilt IMI !o" 1111 fill IIN loll 1110 Nil let NIJ 7111 loll 1 E 1111 MetAl 11"11@114 11,121 II,NI i,tl! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 114611 lots auwlN 19111" III'm N,iN 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 in 9!111 tb I lost 11.0 It." I4.11 I.1@ I.1@ I.1@ I.1@ LN 1.01 !.N I.1@ LN I.1@ 1,11 O.N 0.01 I.1@ 1 dl NO III] ! tell I9JI loll" Id I LN I.1@ I.1@ 1.11 I.1@ 1.01 LN I.1@ I.1@ !.N I.1@ 0.1@ 1,11 LN tlrlllll t reewrchl lee 111713 61.31A IM of It 11 to 11 It to 11 tl 11 11 11 11 to I tee Wit NW 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l0 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 I 0 II M11rAl • rNl Ill II.IN 11.1m lilt of if I JI N I If N If If Is to to If 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t ' 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 ' 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1~ II 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 » 1 1 1 1 » " is 11tH Nrt11p of o~0 11NM ot (hilt 91,11@ 11Jf µ !1 11 ~ if 11 it if N of IfOpull till Jill I2t1 II " 11 µ II 11 J 11 11 µ 11 If 11 N !11111111! 11 If U 1 1 1 1 1 1 It loleb4es III III N I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 1ar11/0 I in it N 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II Isere!!! N It 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1' 1 1 1 I 111k1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 It r 1e11, toll i I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 I t It OIsU Irelebrl N 41 11 tl 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 E 11 Orb IroOel"I a- 1 I II I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 tt Iwlflll lynu Ik ISO !H 1 I 1 ~I 1 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 1 j It 111A1 tRI1N1 ~~.11t „,p, to to A! M 0 ....0 µ ,..so .1, 11 N ..I. 10 ; it 111 INI. Nil i• ' (JI let Ill it JI 11 II it II 111 11 tl 11 II tl to 11 1 WII AN 11lµ IN on 91141@11 1 II flew Niels 10 III III It. 11 11 11 11 I of N N 11 of N 11 to hit toeleo 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N NNr IeM1e1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 tl lot k Iw Ir1r I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 It I%cr to 1@11114 rM 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; ...ii... a.. JI 111 111 1111 I• . 'ill ll~ It II • 10 Its is if of N N 11 If M wiling loll to • • Is (I,IU 111!1@ 11" Il µ tl N 11 µ Uo tl 11 µ N N µ µ uu.e stile 181132 13lo11 u18oi race utn2 rune 131111 renal rJill 313111 Iloilo Aluu Iloilo urns Some N 111 11111111@11 IN in µl It If 14 NOON imma r311e1 Iloilo turn MM Stills 311113 ute't 31ifee 0 of If Allies 113 es I131eI owe fossil MW lines rig-ti Iloilo i Il Aucnl too "Oil lilt Jim) 11.121 •IN.NI 1.10) 0.NO..-M r !•1@J' 11.Iq 11q , (MN 0.01 1•14l t•NO 0.0I Lost 1.1@1 j , I ~ I Rost Ill POOfNAA • 1 tNN11tIA4. 154111 it I INq 511tH KINI Klwl It of if IF 11 It of fl w Ir IF It of 11 p I hwr{t 1 410 1110 1111 Ills 1111 1101 Iwo 1t lot) 1511 1"I 2101 lNI his 1111 1011 IN! to all. 11,111 4,111 Ill It 11.10! 11,5!1 1 1 ~I 1 1 t1 tw. di'lll 11011!1 N, is 1 I 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8ifCast 11,131 11,101 11,111 ,111 20.111 f I 1 I 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 it toll. SL4! "1111 1!!,111 1P1,111 111.111 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I tf IINr 11111 11114 Ill I,NI LOU 0 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 110 AN t1 161.110 41,101 IN,IN )$I'M lll,wl 1 1 1 1 1 2 I I I 1 I 1 1 tn. Cl 1,111,12! 14"'m 1,010,110 8.10.1011,IN,IN 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 I[rEtNl 1 tooltlcl 1115 111 Ill INI 1111 1111 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I toll fill 11 11 of 111 lit t I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 Ithr fill I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 t 1 It Ill Fill NI 111 111 log 41 1 t 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 It tow Fees IN 151 t" 1 1 1 t I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 N 1 I 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 .N ....if ....1 p 1 1.... 11 to 11 f ....o 11 ....i 10 s ....t fl o ....0 IN-It! m I1.IN 111111 N,lSI 11.41 M N 01 !1 tl IS 1 1 1 1 ! I 1 1 I 1 I 1 0 1 1 I 1 € e it lit lit 421 111101 II,I" 11.111 11.111 ....0 10 ....it ....10 10 111.. N 11 N 11 1 1 of (0 1s N Iornll 1121 1111 IE11 1151 lilt N 11 11 II It 11 10 11 10 II 01 N It htetl11 11 so it It IT I I 4 hill Its tit Ill 1" R 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 i, to hrdat 111 NI IN !!I NI 0 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 21111011tH I N II 11 II 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 11 hill 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 11 IN Nil I I 1 I i I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 f 1 1 to 1611 IHtltotf a If tl to if It 1 I I I I I 1 1 I 1 t 1 N 1611 Irmlftl 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 N Notes hot toll I 1 s0 fl It 1 I I OF 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 hrrill N t4oNlts ...,04 {1,111 11..14 11 IN ............N 11-116 11111*4 ","*a 6111*14 -110 1 hr 10 M N N N it Its pit "watt 0251 $1" H •...........~I If list 11 ,11.1 ,112 11 N 11 11 11 N 11 11 N II N !f t1] Io Not 110l lot"" ? N Illtf hills N N N If it N N N N N of 11 14 111 m 10 TO j N Nil brolel I" 111 sw I1$ !N 110 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 11 Not hnlct 11011 I 1 / 4! fN 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 It 161 h Iw Irm I I 11 IAI it hrl tN I I I 1 I I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i u III IN 1111 11) ...'2U ....ill 541 III ....fill Nil .....11 11 11 11 ~0 00 ....of If 111111 MAN !IN NOT 1 111 1,111 ~0 N to NI . 1,112 1,165 114 0 1111111 Iltul .11111 null tprll eulll 111134 mllff1, Isla) 111tH 111511 I still tat l 111trl brill still$ 111111 N lit 1411111110) euIllt 11111 f 1110 fill N,ht (1111 r ! C k, N 111 N • N N pp ~~{1 ty. 111111+ pr11r 111111 Itua n 111 the t 1111 t illnl 1151so 1111$1 111101 111111 tutu entu 11111 nleu flu I to) I•Jl j.1a 1.111 I,t 2.111 1,I4 I Iw 101 'i IN LwI #1 IN }.$II,I.IN 4.60 : Lwl 1.4" I,IN II ti*llt 111111 I.!! 0.10 8.10 1.110 1,10 1.110 1.11 1.110 1.11 1.11 tom IJN wl I'm 1.00 1.151 1,100 It01,tAw,IH[II t . ~i . Kt' v `a1 1 . J ' 1 ~I 1 SC~NAR10 :~.A f , i I , 1 1A, -T- ~T c E } CODE. CA -COMM RETAIN lD -LANDFILL DECREASE FILL LE - LANDFILL EXPANSION CS-COMMWILD LO- LANDFILL CURRENT FILL LI-LANDFILL INCPEASE CAD - C RETAIN OCCREAN LA - LANDFAL ACCELERATE FILL OH - DIRECT HAUL k CAE- 0 RETAIN E>oCLUSIVE COMMERCIAL OPTIONS foot 1010 1065 1601 1606 1006 1007 1161 1606 2060 2001 JIM 6003 6001 2006 SCENARIO IA RES RATE 066 lae 66S 1016 1966 1166 1200 1200 15.10 1166 1616 16.26 1616 11.26 t7.06 COMM RATE 113,66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I CS-LC-TS ANN 01(L) R 120 211 666 (202) 12M 5261( g7!r16t1 (101) 1111 0 6 20 51 16 j NPV INTEAF.61 0 10 I1 76 66 W IS is J! 0 0 0 0 4 0, 36000 J$Wj CUM OW R 120 120 1.017 171 663 144 201 _66 (71) (60) (61)~_ 20); 6 It loos I 110 FEE 0 0 0 Or 10 !02 166 610 221 970 911 2/! NI 170 1770, AD TRANS C 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AD TRANS L 26 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 I~ 1 s 1 r 44 1 RES RATE & CUM REVENUE G/L COMM SELL - LF CONSTANT - TIP STATION i 20 15 i - p 15 10 ` PIES RATE 10 .---t--.--- s = CUM GAINILOSS I If 1695 1002 1093 1664 1666 1666 1097 1006 1906 2900 2001 2002 2003 1004 1006 1 CS-LC-TS SCENARIO 1A 1 1 r t i " NIIN111m 6111 rl 16NNY • VI tOfV4mtm 11:11:12 17 i IN1j I' Ui4i1 st"Vis A 11- . mifal mlWl 11 11 II If h it 11 IT If 11 11 fl If II 11 to 0 (111 ILM If 1110 1111 III. 111. 1111 lost INS 5116 1111 1111 INI 1111 INI INI 2111 1111 !NI I film Nllm "110tH 111.111 1M,111 Iflc1N II1,N1 IN,IM 111,14 10,111 1",111 {",111 111,111 74,111 111,11! 111.15 321,113 114111 111,211 111,111 E 1 Mk torn GIIIet/1 11dSI 10,111 2.411 11.411 0 in 11,1" 11.111 11,111 0,111 Ndll II6I" ",111 II.IM 116,111 1",111 111.111 IN,111 i ill talle 111 IMI I O 1.0 0.0 1.4 1.0 1.11 in I.IS 1.6 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.0 1.13 1.11 LM IAS O IM "l till I Coll I.N 1.11 1!! 1 N 1.11 11J! 11.0 11.0 11.6 IL" U.I! 11,0 Il.lt Il.if ILn &I of ItU N""I S} 11"IM.1111 It" 11,111 PAN 1.11 1,161 1,111 1.111 4"I t.its 1,142 I.IU 1141 1,111 5.411 1.14 1.111 LIn I.tlJ ' 1 140 lwIII Iselin 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 { 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 Mlllm • till all 1441 ILIN 1,114 II.tN 11,111 1614t 11,"1 p.111 p,311 11.111 11,60 0.111 11.41 11,616 Iblll 14.111 11,211 I fell if NNu U" 4 If 0 11 N N Il N N it 11 N If N M In III 11 IMMN IN 1 N " III IN IN I" lit 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 If 11 Lill III 1 of IUI 11 16 lM1 141 141 INI I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 It to "113 W 1 I N I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I If 1 I 11 tole Amt 1 1 t6 IN IN IN In III 151 Id IA 111 1 1 1 I 1 If orbit pal Ill 1 1 11 0 S6 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 • 1 1 »1 1111111'4 16011 14111 ,6! $1.1 fl p,W p,pl p,Hl p.I6I pol! Will !1.111 11,111 p,lll p,1N Q.•dll 11,111 11:"1 . « » . 111lt111411 ' i payroll NN I N IIN N 611 fill INI WAS i 111.046 I111.119 01.13 111111 11, IINI p.071 11,111 N,I IS ll 1 W If NNlln In IN 211 In N to 141 fM M 1ri 111 IM No I ILL In 10 W W 110 IN ! It Alrlwa M IN lu IN W I" M M NI 111 111 IN IM 111 111 NI NI l II NreleN IN N IN 121 1" I" M Ili IN III III NI IN IN W lit I11 11 Im"OU 0 If fl 11 N 10 N 11 11 N II of 16 p 0 11 If a hot t 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I / 1 1 If I I If 14111 Nit 1 f 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 It M111r1eful 0 in 101 111 tit Ut 116 M I" !M in 10 a ill 146 341 it ill 11 441 111 t11A1110O11"1O 1 1 O N N p 14 0 N 2161111111 to" IN 24 in 14 1 1 0 1 1 1 1' 1 1 1 1 If 1 N IWas fO 1 1 k If 1 N) 111 111 1" I4 6" 14 W W 111 1.144 1.601 1.161 01 11,111 14.4 9.41 pd" pd" 6410" 14. It N firm 1119M 11,01 11."1 ~IM 11.111 I2,S4 pill p.O1 9.60 9.141 i -1... _ « 0 NI If Nlmtlim IN 1110 ; 1111 lilt 08 (pall (1150) 111411 !IINI 111111 flat 112 IN IN IM NI IN Cool off w Wo N IIN 11011 IfaWll N 111 j Nf IN N IN I" IN IN IN IN IN M 111 IN I" "I N 1M 6011N I 1 I 1 1 1 I 0 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 NNt loom I 1 1 If 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 11 ill lo 10 Noll I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 p Im1 If 1101111 tM 1 If I I I I 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 { I 1 1 is If 1 1 I I I 1 I 14 lit to WI 101 ....N lit ..•114 In ....11 ...u~ us ..In . in . In . IN III N in HI . V.... _ N 111 011110 fall Ito 1460 11'.141 11.116 0.111 11 ltl ;,111 win 9,111 a Ili 11.N! 11.161 I7,UI palm 11.1" 11,aN µ.111 14.111 1e1ss1 14W 111110 MM 311113 111111 "loll fossil Uuu MM 191111 little allele !lull lltfll 11/1'1 /"Ill i 16 111011110111 IN (1Nl IIN 11) INI 111111 (01" 111111 11110) HIM 111111 111 N N IN 111 111 .11111 nail :"ill I:Illf 111111 W111 111111 llll" 111111 tittle 111ilt 111111 111111 114111 little Well will 11 U11O11 11 1 I.M 1 If 11 M 11 M 11 11 1 1 I I I It 1 14 to M My IaIUI.Mf 1111 IM IIAU lilt 110 1111 Mt 111 1181 (IMI 1"11 1I4I (INI It I" E N 11NUI tit U 1111111 Ian 1"111 I.M 0.10 I.NI t ill 1.111 1.114 I."5 1.10 till Mss I.M 1.111 1 Off 1.211 41MIIIU lot 111 2.111 LNI I.M 1.01 1.111 1.M I,IN 3. VA 1111410116 loll LN LN 1.11 LN 601 6" 1.10 1.11 1.11 1.11 1a I.n 1.11 ILN i1.4 MH"IOilllmll"114 IINI 1 4101 NI411 lmll N toil lIII 1 `4. + ~ r 1 WAlKiM 11111 4119111NM41 • oil comol 1w~ I 16:411 1 It 1 total rlat:11 fr H rr If It t iattt111e K1I11 IKIVM rr It Ir rt F1 Ir ; 11 r 1r !rta IMI tlli NIt too 111) am !Mi M) ,4~ lll+ •1+N IN 1Ni tN1 !NI 141! 4..: 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 ! I Ilk ta11It WIN IIdB U,Ni 6.Ita + + 1 I Mae 14141 G, low n1.1ts 111,191 q,p1 + + 1 1~ 1 1 + 1 1 1 1 I 1 M tall Ids 0 CHI to ll tN.ll 1!.!S 1 N I.N 1. 1 N 4.N N ~,N 1. 1 N I,N 1 N LN Ittlllw I 1 1 1 1 1 rtwftal rrta 11,1s 11,11, Its 1' I I' 1~ 1; I+ 1 I; ; 1~ J 6 Ia Weal 1211 1 1 + 1 1 + 1 + + 1 1 1 + . + 1 ...1~ 1 INIII1t • tell ar II,Iis ~1,Im, • Ill$ 11 10 q N N N b a } + ll ► i II 1 + 1 1 1 + + + 1 + ~ + + 1 + 1 1 1 1 1 + II i i r I I I F j Il I N w u a 1! wilt Ilrt4YE) II,III 11.01 1121 11 I1 t +I H 11 N ~1 N folaitlnl Nil It14 Ito 11 N I 11 11 to Il q II I Ii 1 1 II (troll „ : N Ir + 1 I 1 + + 1 + , 1 1 + 1! /M/lla In 111 q + j 1 1 1 1 + + 1 + + E 111taUnree 1 + 1 U Nnlrta la o ~ + 1 + 1 1 1 ! 1 lllttafltae i+ 0 1 + + 1 1 1 + a Mlr, I 1 1 1 + 1 1 1 1 1 + 1~ , 1 1 a 1+I ReH I ( 6 + 1 , , f it +4111 Isma41e M 11 ll II F ` ~ l 1 1 1 1 + 1 1 + , 11 MtU htaellt/ ti IN It! !ta + + w t"0111 low . . . ....F II 1 II N q p . a 1 1 1o a q . ..i. it 11111 tdwul 11 d.i 0".111 N1, N N r r w N N i! tt N14 qty IN 1r 1!1 11 11 1 14 a r II 11 11 Il 64111'191 wN4,in in, totem, 111 11 11 11 1, ; is I` ~ 11 1 + 1 + !4 IItN Nt1U ' , , + 1 1 1 1 + t14111I41tta j , 1 t l + 1 1 1 + 1 , , + l N Nltr L1oeU , , l 1 1 1 + + + l 1 1 gMIMInItw ' F , , l 1 1 1 1 t , + 1 1 N Uer 1//111101 tM I 1 , , , + 1 1 1 1 +l N a Il 111 1!i II 14 II a N N II N .11 X10 ti ill IN We „ 11 II 11 It of H 111 NIS,'1N 1111 ter II,Ni I1.iN 1116 11 N 11 a 11 11 N q a N 11 112141 111921 Wall mM Muss ttt. uuu ratty trri11 utt uuN Wrrµ rut' 414111 414111 141210 414111 71 HI Nl4t(lNll IN IU N1 tl It N NS11N 1+111rw u:tat eu n 411911 uuu cult 4111 1:4121 uttss uuu uuu 2141/1 411411 a 1 tuts 2191, uttn 411411 +.NI Lill LNl LIN 1! HnIII 4111 ht Itit SL1N ILn1 IN.IN LNI 1. LIN LNI LNI ~.N1 1'41 4'IN 1i . rn,. Yr. 0.W '•....Y.. .n' -qFW 1 t h a r • In/11t1 IAIPoAAA 04 tp/IIq AL fl t 11N) 11:!1:12 cl•tt•11 It1Ylt MILK II II rr 11 If 31 II Ir If I1 11 11 11 to rr knarle IN III. ' 11 !too 1111 MI 1911 1111 1911 IMI 1M1 It" !111 III !al Tell ml III 3111 1 63 111. It,+1! 11,! . N.IfI ~H,411 1 1 1 f f 1 I ,.1 '.1 ••1 ••.1 I Cl Cm. 191,111 al.IJt N,124 ' 1 1 1+ 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 i i J If tell WIN 11.111 11.141 es,111 I 1 II! 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11f Col. 9.111 N,le0 163,111 lu.H1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 + 1 1 ! 1 t1 floor l.4l 1,116 1,111 1,111 I 1 L 1►t oo1 91 119.111 3a,41 311,411 kt.631 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 Co. tl 1, 111.1211,501.104 LOOMIS I,Nt,l11 1 1 1 1 I 1 f 1 t I 1 1 f 119w[t I tostlott lees ❑I III 111 It? 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 ! 1 f 1 I took lilt It It 11 IN 1 1 1 I I 1 1 If like fest 1 I 1 3 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 11 Its rift IN 111 f11 JII 1 1 1 1 1 / ! ! I I s 1 11 tiH lees IN M all 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 IJ Cam Ills lee 1 I 1 I I.Ia 1 1 1 1 1 11 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 rl 1 1 1 I 1 U IN 110 Ill 11.111 II,NI 11,111 11.81 II 11 ~t . f . II ' II ' N N N f N 17 U 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 .....1 . 11 111 Us 1 . . 111,1111111411 (63 11,11! II,fN 11.141 U, NI N N '1 „ ....of ....If N 1 11 Is N to " 11 Nrtill 1111 fill 1111 NN N 11 N 11 N It to to It N N If IIIMIIIn ft 11 Il 31 1 1 1 1 1 I ` 114111 131 IN IIJ 146 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 { 1 1 tl krrlcof lit M 163 IN I f f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 i It 1mtsH/ 1 11 to N 1 1 1 1 1 { 1 1 1 I 1 1 11 MITI 1 1 f 1 f 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 { 111&1 kit I I J I 1 1 f I 1 1 1 1 II 6611 trnoltn 11 N 7f N 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 f 1 I I f N Able Lftefns I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 11 klor PHI felt 1 1 11 tl I 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 { ! 11 I 1 , I 1 1 1 f t 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 Ir+eA1 •..~ill ...'1il ...'IA .....'i .....a ...N . 411311A1 . M N N I 11 of r...u. ..41.41 .....u .....M ..y... o.. W YI litt NII MU 1'351 III list 371! 9,111 11 11 II II N it N f N N N N N 11.1 Mats of 11 N N If Is 16 N N 11 N it N N N N tl "1 tulles 11t 111 11f IN 111 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f N kit ITIda Fit 1 1 1 1 11 11 11 11 41 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 SO kJ w IH hYS 1 1 I 1 t 1 1 f 1 I! 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 IM Is lerA too 1 1 t 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1+ Ili ON w0 tie . 1.711 fill 1112 nu 9,111 111 111 111 111 ~f ....If "I°I 'i '••••N N 31 !s Al wu11a 1 In 1.111 I.I9 1.111 1.111 li ii N 11 1 1 f 1 ......i 1 ~ 1 1 11 I 1 I little islets 211111 feelu N eel 111811 little ecru ' rani ~1• 1f 11~ IAI1111a11 tell 11111 1113) too III III) 11111 )IN)1 11I61 ~t1! t u}j. 4141p!9 tl u 111111, 4141!o nett turn 11 l (Ll IA1E'. 111111 i N N ' . N fp {{11A~~pN qq~{l1 ! 9111!! !lam HTtff it 111 111111 little 191111 1 !8111 Irll ! f 1 th 1 111111 Itllfl stl11$ 11 1 113110 1f lwk~ll M~ ! I! ~.IN j~I~.IN t.N1 Ei I IN ~'H~ . ~.lN ! IN r,,IN IN i-l~im NI IA I!S IN 1.11/ 1f .141 1,111 IIIt1.N1 II ItA.M,IwtNtl,IIMN)' S I I.GN' 1.111 IJII I , I 4 r t i C SClmN'AR t0 2 I .i I 1 E .i 0c r -1 MEOW r r i C'• J f j f i r t s r 1 i CODE. OR - COMM RETAIN LD -LANDFILL DECREASE FILL : CB-COMMSOLD LC- LANDFILLCIRRRENIF2.i Lf-LAND ILL INCREASE v CAD-C RETAIN DECREASE LA- LANDFILL ACCELERATE FILL DH - DIRECT HAUL A6E I F ORE- C RETAIN EXCLU/NE DIRECT HAUL COMMERCIAL. OPTIONS i 1901 1902 103 1"1 INS 1990 11"? 190e 190f 2000 2001 no 2003 we two (I SCENARIO 2 REBRATE r0S 995 905 tO,Se 1060 11,25 1200 1205 tT06 i ttSd6 'p ' Q 0 0 COMM RATE 11,04 race 1818 1476 1T es C9-LC-ON ANN tlr{U R 1_ li , 26a 200 717 217 0 0 0 NPV INTEREST - 251 111SI ~2p r11p 0 t1 0 0 0 f1 70 !7- e7 ' 21 Is 14 of 0000 1,077 cua0al(1.) a 110 ote 7dS 1.160 117 Ib2 I.e 41149 100 - 172 11t-' 00 A 2001 1,692 2871 2,Oee flue Cut 2,127 2.211 2.810 2,767 W2 t2t 1 111:11 1 1.126 LbfEE 60 0 0 0 0 u 102 AD / TRANS wiNi 33 ° ° o ° ° 1 210 :p7 22d eu :sT M1 I!70 pt 20 70 72 34 7e 30 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 ~r f I , I i1 I I f 1 1 E RES RATE & CUM REVENUE G/L COMM SELL - LF CONSTANT - DIR HAUL i 20 - i5 ~c 1 0 15 - - 10 u~3 RES RATE owo ' r~ ~ I 55 5 a p r CUM (WNILOSS t, 0 L_~_ •5 tool 1962 1096 1*4 1996 7998 1007 leis 1960 WW 2001 2002 aC09 2001 2006 CS-LC•DH t SCENARIO 2 t r - 4 al l r a t + 1 W K1011.1. 71100141t yaYll 1. - LO I.ItlnlllM 11 21; 71 111 1 10001 l!'l4GN kemnl t all G.NII It II 12 P fI OY II 11 11 11 11 17 It 71 Is lift life 1191 1193 AM 1494 1117 1101 11111 1111 1410 1000 1001 1107 INS IODI 4101 1 10111, MAN94 (071040! 00s11 111,111 111, oil 111,101 111,171 111,141 115,111 I", 10 411,111 20.111 705, Ill 2111,80 111141 171.111 111,101 113,171 131,IS4 7 tuht !all talllcia0 11,031 11,110 11,411 11,1!5 Ills I1 11,111 11.1!1 11,1!3 11,13 11,311 17,111 is 'fit 11,111 100,111 161,710 107,01 101,111 , 1 so I I$ 1 11 8,41 6.41 0 45 1 is I Art its MI I JISt 1.01 1,11 4,1s 11! 1,$ 10 .11 10.75 ~J5 110 12.13 13 Is 11.0 45.11 11,0 101 11,PS 17,15 II YSNY6 7 111411t1111ips Il.w iI,430 1,714 1.164 I,nl 1,10 IMI 1,161 IS42 7.311 1,111 1,171 L01 1,101 1,111 I,ISf A.24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 I Its Sotnll Pick a I 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 f I 1 1 1 1 1 f I I 1 1 0 / 1 0 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 f ..w,l 51114Ial 1V51 Alf 1!.111 11.01 11,751 14,171 81,711 11,111 11.151 it M 43.It2 17,511 12,146 13,131 W129 11,01 6,114 0,137 11,217 4 sell at 41151 110+ 0 43 45 41 s0 54 $1 43 11 11 11 11 s0 4 101 lit t11 110 ItnaO hl 1 9 17 114 tls 111 10 112 51 1 1 1 1 1 { 1 1 If 10001 in J 1 1131 13 $1 171 711 111 11411 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 Loottltla7 It, 1 1 12 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 { ! 1 1 i, I! sale wort 1 1 112 111 110 lie 111 tit Its IIS 136 111 1 1 1 1 1 IN ltlp Ins lay 4 1 70 10 10 ID 10 10 SID 8 f 1 1 4 ! 1 ! . C,:. f Will llNs 11.731 11,113 12.011 !2,107 12.101 02.541 12:01 1T171 (Lill !tall If,19 mw II 371 Ulm 13.111 (tali II,I53 1 10[101(oh 1 IS payroll Iles un 1111 SO tilt 1171 fell 11.111 11.711 ILJSJ 11.421 11.411 11.541 11.145 11,123 11,111 (1.10( 112 313 111 i e Is INCIII61 211 !d 717 7!/ 11! :is h5 2111 301 Its 321 311 As Sol U Nal t4emK1 Iss 111 IS6 110 IN $11 IM 111 711 241 251 111 Ns 411 LA 131 146 If SUrttnl lot If 111 225 411 Its 70 70 211 117 III 741 111 !et 341 111 Ile N tNUlfoxf 24 71 A 71 21 29 if $1 111 11 II 11 11 11 $I SI S) 1 ri his Ot I 1 1 7 1 1 f 1 ! f 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 71 la1 Oe01 14 111 141 117 121 115 411 412 I 1 11 Aeau hlnahlt is Ill 261 711 413 ,II 731 Hs 411 771 7 JS Ohl11nmfitl it 1 1 41 11 sl 12 14 16 56 11 6 11 11 11 11 11 19 IIm4lI (101411 1'41 243 214 711 246 IA 21S 172 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 n Iltalnf All 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 795 112 Sat 111 121 ..461 112 . $11 101.1 11#90571 11 ,40 11.101 11.121 42.111 12.111 12.131 ILA4 11 .111 17.110 0 Os 1J 11S III'm 13.414 13 .19 13 ,144 11,114 111119 1 , 11 Nil or 00tliflDef 111 11101 fill We Vol 007 1131 lilt 11151 1171!1 (War 121 61 111 171 1101 it it CAA 610 ION WP 1111+57! 21 21,11 A it t 14 117 116 121 11 671 IN ill 611 171 IM 121 121 171 171 IN IN 11 011: surlco 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 11 OtMf bllnsa 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 f If tit 06 too Itiml 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 4 1 8 1 1 1 73 t0cr to enrltnt ue 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 i, 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 I I 1 C 11 101 a dill 190 00 Ill fit 121 12 $N IN 121 too 120 141 ill 110 ill „a # 4, 101 NI16r00t Note I:1 (LbI Sims Will 0.151 6.00 $1.111 11,214 11,1f1 12.01 ILOJ smos 11,311 15,50 11.01 6101 11 tso 14.161 tclti !1111 111111 1:4111 Ita,t Ilm, 211,11 ItIll, 221!21 13111: WM 111:11 111!!1 J1111 ImAl all:$ 111111 1 All il1l111Y.51 326 3111 1241 Ilse 120 617 1311 list 31151 11201 WAM 14 116 1!5 111 114 0t VMt a1f ,"!I ',flill 1:1111 1;1111 111111 111:11 Milt 11:111 111th bait 11:!11 11,111 IYI11 111121 21111 1 it 1111111tl AI 1 1.10% 1 It 11 51 111 Ill 1st 611 141 141 111 Ill 6 IN 141 .11111 nit oil 61111,10111 Il4t 1511 Sit$ 11.111 11,541 12,14t 17,061 11.41 11,02 12.171 $,.llt 17,111 11,113 11,013 91.04 l!I(l1t let IN oil IM ISit 6,$71 1.001 1105 1.11% 1.14% LSO $.111 1121 6.151 1.121 I. in 1.111 1.0% 1.11) 3.111 4: LLI16llb. IAII lit 2750 1,046 3,00 1,1,01 Less Lose 11010 1,154 4t iMIC its $43 2.10 1.41 1.11 1,11 1.14 3.19 J.6 SS2 1.6 1,41 IN 1.41 4.41 111 4.1% 14 Nil 00(5111 154101 I$ Me $1,011 is Nil NiStl! 1#901 If 2101 14,121 . .w~Jti.h,:I, Ik, J. w;...,+.. n '322:12':} fJ xe,u.n'i .nw w 1 ~ I 1 ~ w~Vr 1 S 6 . IJyI 1 i 1 { 1 { COAeENCIAt IOLio RASH PROtoom • 111 tM OCIAl j 1112t.14 111 1411 0-tt-ON Stvartl I RIUAI ACIUAI It It 11 It IS It 11 11 ri 11 11 11 t1 it it loll 1110 loll 1197 1113 life 1115 Mh 1111 1111 1591 2100 toll 1002 7003 1001 205 j I IDEAL AAfUAt 0110AIAS 11,120 11.101 6.161 1 1 I / 1 1 1 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 LE tulle 11HI tellrctd 05,795 I25.2St 19.621 1 1 0 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ore Coic III I Cost MALE 11.11 11.01 f.0 I,DI 1.01 1.01 1.01 1of 1.01 too 1.01 1 00 LAo 9.01 1.61 1.01 1 o1l Pik It11 1 cult 11.71 10/.40 115.55 1.01 0.00 1.11 1Do 1.0 1.00 1.10 I'll 1.0 1.00 1.10 A.of 1,01 1.60 RtINUI3 5 tolA.iMll Iris M.3li 11.311 1715 10 to 50 to 50 10 e0 is 11 90 10 10 $0 t1 A 1111 101061 IAUI 6 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 I 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 j 6 1 0 9 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 6 A 1 1 1 1 1 i. 1 SUIM1At • CUS1 Ili 11.113 11,311 $35, 10 10 I0 10 10 10 17 10 10 10 to 5o 0 10 / 1 I 1 0 1 ! 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f r If 11 1 1 / 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 6 1 EN / I I I I I I 1 6 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1.., O a..... .•..a• 0 IOIA1 PIrlNUtt It,315 11.116 1115 t0 10 10 10 11 14 11 10 10 10 10 10 M it l.fPEND110AEN If brfoll 6121 NEU 1209 10 10 II to of 10 II 10 tl 11 so so 10 It is 111/1111 11 51 It 1 I I 1 1 I I I 0 1 1 1 0 I - 16 Ri1n11n1AU 115 III 11 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 II terrRos 131 p if 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 ! ! I I It In/rune 30 If 9 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 0 1 1 1 ! Sf iuolts 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 70 111 Debt 1 / 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 6 1 It 1 1 I 21 Rollo InnS1116 to 47 7t l1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 PAIN 11inf}111 CI 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 . I I I 1 6 1 1 1 9 I 2: il" 1111 toolnlf 111 LESS 219 1 1 6 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 21 101A1 MetNSFS $1411 11,131 1071 it If t0 to 10 10 $I to of 10 11 11 11 10 it x11 Doti Ig9S 130 oil AN If to No 11 10 to 10 11 10 l0 10 11 10 10 CAM MO MEN Not OPEN WENS10 h full Anvil 11 111 121 to 10 10 10 If 11 10 10 It 11 11 11 tl of t1bill 1irdes 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 I 219toel 1.0061 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 to kit OA Its BIAS 1 I I 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 0 I 1 I 1 I 1 30 letr 11 h(wo CAN 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 p .....I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 0 6 1 1 1 1 11 Ai it IPI AON Doti 10 111 ...171 .....11 14 . ....II ....11 ....II .....If 11 . ....II ....11 ....`p ....It M 101 Ootliou Doti U! WAS 11.311 1111 I0 10 II IC Is t0 11 ' of 10 10 I N to ....0 10 tl tl:! t1tA 111119 12121' , /Mall letter 1Mit1 Itlt11 SIMI little tittle Mill little 14t11 little tfult told, u 30011 MWIt1331 IA 116 is? It 10 10 11 11 10 If 10 0 LEI If le 11 It 111011 11ANS11A little 1111M tlatl little sews 111.14 111191 112111 little 311112 t21911 tilell stills Stills mill Mutt hill/ SS IMCINI C00 10 Ito lilt 11.101 H A I •101.01 1.001 1.101 IM I. Y.1 1101 1.106 1.001 1.101 91001 1.01 1. bit 1.111 1.101 ....-.c:....,~.r. h'mla 6c .n.n,..t.'..F:. r. u. aow?ANaV:ra S I - M1 , i '::rryi 111 .Yq Wn,i Yl91YM:QIM . i II 1 10011 11:11:71 is Who k1Wt itsf4 N 11 it II if II rr fl tl R II 11 It It II Ilu4 hp II4 IRI 1111 Htt 1114 INI IN1 INt 2911 lift i1N INI 141 fl tll{ feel loll I Cl Ali Ir.lll 4.141 11.111 N,t111 10611 11MI 1010 I5.I1S •.•1 / 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 tl fail 191,111 111.351 11.171 f I 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 lhCash 1 11 tint 1"157 71 NI H,NI Will 1IJJ4 10,114 31.411 11,111 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 . p.111 %I III I4j.40 751.141 211.131 211,161 1f1.1J1 111.4! of 1 1 toi iai 01A,: a 3,701 IIN 1114 IhNr I'M 1.111 1.711 1.H3 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I Il 1 1 1 34"ll 351,011 143.465 ho,131 J11,111 111.19 114113 14,111 1 1 1 I 3 tut, al 114 MS I,m #III t, 141.1651.111,1111,41.879 7,NJd1i i.111.1114,41,116 1 1 1 1 1 IRIIItli 1 1 f 1 0 1 1 4 1 Irodrarl ron Ill ;17 IN 81 tot fit Its III 1 1 1 f 1 (all ha N 14 It 101 III !01 M 1 1 1 1 1 IM 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 to IIMI fen S 1 ( 7 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 It 45 roof 301 115 In fU 14 III !!I ht 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 11 !IN lots IJI SSS t8 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' . N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / it 91v all 31;1 11.101 Il,ta 11.141 II.riJ ILUI Is.Jq 11,136 N II. » t1 10 N IO lY •••11 1• . I f 1 1 1 J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! , It 10111r 8171 ILIN 11,410 ILhI 11,75! 11,141 II.JOI 11.1Jf . . III lk9trl : 11 10 to 10 11 11 10 11 to I 10 f small 1711 1711 list list IJ II 1119 8171 1449 II 11 $1 11 If Ir !1 11 !1 F F 71 In I'w it 11 9 Ir 11 p 10 IJ 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 e y Y•+ Its ill IN Ili IN lit IN NI / 1 1 1 1 f f I i It Nrn rn tSl 101 141 1 lit 81 He 141 Its 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1.111 lots 1 11 It II II t1 11 It I 1 1 1 1 i~ 1 S fl Wtbe 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 . 11 Id lets 0 1 1 1 } 15 MITI 11401rort 11 11 11 71 JI 11 JI 34 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 f h 6611 110111111 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / j 31 Ibr tnN Ikl 1 1 11 N it 5 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 4 t1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 . 111 1 It 1 1 i Inl:sts" P6IA 1511 lilt BIl 1111 INI pll qsl 114 If II II N If of •'..11 •".""10 If 70 All lots $I like fill IIIt (179 IIII pis 119 1113 1411 oil III 101 b11 trllostl tl le If q p (l if 11 11 N IJai, 21684 II it of to 14 M III He II II II II II is Is 11 SI lilt $41 vice h1 211 81 M lit Ill III IN ill 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 1 J $1 lot l1411IrnlttrAs 1 1 f 4 N N II p Is 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $4 lot IN Pill 14n I / 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 It I 1 1 1 0 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L 101 IN 014 11 IhJ 1711 SNi p9 171! 111. qSl IM 1161 II II of to N If N II It if 14 111 Flags IN I'M 1.111 1.166 I'm 1.111 it Imbl N I,N{ I,IN 169 1 0 1 orIIII rnml lnl:! loot burl uful nun "I'll nl If l+ro 1 11r II urrll Pima 1 All 111., it 111 rlr It AJ1l llh 1111 I011 lilt 851 1211 1211 Iltt locals q 11 ~1 N JI II N II II lilt 411 i. rTI1 ❑rlrl :mf12 ulfll Iulll Miss little muss 121111 111111 milt 11❑ t mill will rllmlll '41111 mill I i It 1.41 118 I U.MI LNI 1.101 LIST 1.151 1,151 I,IN /,IN ON /.IN 1m I IN I.IIf 1.14 LNt 1.41 k N 101114 111 nIk l 75 J 14 J. ql 1.111 104 I.14 1.411 3.450 LNI 1.101 I'm "111 1. no / IN f.Nl I.IN 1.111 I•I AIMgW 1.114111 I v I I, I 1 f+II r r i ryv F i k SCENARSO 3 Y { 42 a R F E ff CODE. CPi-COMMm m LD -LANDFILLDECREASEFILL f: CS - Comm SOLD LC - LANDFILL CURMff FILL LE - LANDFILL LANDFILL EXPANSION I CAD-C RETAINOECREME LA- LANDFILL ACCELERAtEFILL M - DIRECT FlCTHNCREASE CRE-0RETAINEXCLUSIVE DiA11l F COMMERCIAL OPTIONS W 1101 to" im 1104 low lm 1107 l01/ low 1000 1001 t00! 1001 1001 100/ SCENARIO3 AESRATE /G6 006 II06 1018 10.86 11.36 1100 12.0! 1310 1406 Isis letb 1676 1>.!6 Jibs] COMM RATE 116,06 0 0 0 0 0 CS-LO-LE ANNQTL) R 146 356 200 346 011 360 M/ !Ip 0 ° ° 0 0 0 NPV INTEREST 0 11 _ >te 614 btl Sao 661 N1 1M 474 us m o l,IM CUM I1 117 11: ili !3i 210 04 ~ttl A Iq 611 765 1.160 t, 3 tell 1,q! 3.100 1.121 4,111 1.314 1,111 7.3N SAM 6114 L 3,20/ LID FEE '0 0 0 ~0 N 10l 18/ HO tt1 !3a AD TRANS C u 0 0 0 / IF 0 0 ° ° t41 !1l Hl 27/ S1o ADTAM11 L to 30 32 34 30 O° 40 43 Io ° ° u a: as of o a ~ VPF w, 1 RES RATE & CUM REVENUE G/L COMM SELL - LF CONSTANT - LF EXPAND 20 15 ~ f= a 0 15 10 IL ff 10 6 s 'f I fry CUM GAIN/LOSS 0 5 - -f _ - - 0 -5 Q tool ,oil Im Im Im INS Im Im tooo 2000 2001 2002 20x1 2001 2000 CS-LC-LE SCENARIO 3 I I 1 e ^I\ 1 • r 11 'i Y } It :'Drl let VtlU MIL 000UMM - 4.U tUenau„L ,107', II I1 A 10001 'i C,-10'LL xlrUll S 4(1uAL AIrUq I1 If IY 11 fY fl II fr ff fl Ili If ff t1 2V d 1911 1910 1491 1112 I1/J 1191 119$ 1196 1112 tole 1999 1090 loll 1162 2001 2001 200 1 IDEAL ANNJAL 0510MINS 04,02 IMM 111.310 112,101 121,161 111,111 113,111 110,113 111.19) 190,111 205,IH 211,162 126.141 It2,lll IM101 113.fit 119,14 7 Coen will Catltnto 11,131 21.111 21,111 I9,oss 10,511 11,262 13,110 11.115 11,015 10,!(3 13,611 95.011 11,520 100,111 111,111 105.411 101,162 ' 1 ere WNIC 1111 took I $6 his 1.41 0.4% 1.11 4.45 1.41 I IS 1,11 14S 1.41 I.4S 1.41 1.41 A45 Cis I.0 A OV4 Olt IIII 1 cull 0.01 Lit ►.91 1. 11 $.Is 10.111 loss 1135 11.00 11M 11.13 PAS ls. is 16 is 11.11 LIS 1161 IIYINUIS !II 5 161161611tH Ir1 11.584 11,111 1,151 1,164 I'M 1.141 1.151 2,140 1,141 2314 1,141 3.231 1.420 3,101 1,116 4,041 1,113 A en SoMhl f4rkus a e I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 A 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 e 0 0 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 Su1101AL • Pull PEW 01.514 11,131 11.151 11,111 11,111 11,111 11.151 12.160 12.142 12,514 12,10 13,131 13,121 15,101 13,116 11,421 14.233 it Sill of 04100 $Sol 41 41 45 41 Sa $4 11 62 66 71 71 I1 11 16 101 ILI lit It License In 0 36 12 114 MIS 111 141 HE SS 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 I 11 L1Mlill framer 0 1 6211 174 I0 »t HI 3JJ 11941 11 62 21 fill Ist2 11011 12111 1 1 11 Conrchl Ili 1 0 21 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 IA11 A1r1 1 1 162 191 III III' 111 IA 111 [is Ise 131 0 0 1 / 15 oler III, ter. 1 I 20 40 40 to le 40 510 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 .....I [DIAL ItYS 11,451 01,111 12,061 11,101 12,112 121151 11.624 12,257 MAIL 12,901 13,131 11,341 13,501 (3,146 13,110 13,421 14,161 . INPLNDIILMLI v 16 hYrofl lilt Iris V91 tell till 1121 1961 11,015 11,111 11,110 11J11 12,214 11,111 11,141 11.121 11,106 11,515 I1 W0111a 114 161 111 HI 143 755 211 226 212 191 110 313 Hs 513 lit 311 II NMmimm1 lit 110 Its 160 ht 116 In 196 194 114 Its 134 141 Ida 111 III lot 101/1firl Ili 11 116 its 201 IH 105 115 221 232 241 261 tk th 302 111 131 101mIarlnc1 26 24 16 21 21 11 it $I 11 33 14 is JI 11 31 40 42 21 Moro I 1 I I 1 1 1 0 0 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 It 044 Olt( I I 1 f I f 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 23 A/ell 1410allrl 01 111 211 241 351 113 224 »5 196 101 l» SH 314 161 111 Se/ 405 111 14 Adele 111AS1111 SC 1 0 If 41 10 Sl 11 11 11 11 12 66 it 11 is 16 It 3s LIe01111 trDlnll M 245 No 144 111 HI 312 296 104 Sit M 121 111 345 Ila 112 651 1 .....1 1 1 ► 26 IOIAL 1014911 11,101 111111 11,971 12.031 12,121 12 3911 12,112 will 11,492 12,111 11.116 12.131 12,»l 11,111 13,21t 11,111 13,44 if r Nor Of OILAA130N1 126 11161 1161 1370 1202 IJ60 13V 1111 6269 ties list list 1544 ISS4 1511 1411 lilt PAI AND NON toil I010111 1111040 Well 10 Ill 12t 110 17 124' 121 121 121 120 121 120 121 lit I» 171 121 It 0101 SGYta 1 1 I 1 I 61 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 to Other trDlml 1 4 6 1 1 I{ 1 1 1 I 1 4 1 1 I 1 I SO 041 On Ent Tram I 1 1 I 1 6, 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I it Iran It Mottles Cal 1 1 4 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 $1 101 NON DIE1 CPA 10 Ill 116 111 N 120 7 I» 121 Ito IH 131 126 1» 1» Ili IN its - 121 14 14t OMNINON Dpll to 61,106 11,141 1011 Wait Will 12,111 11,101 12,101 12.111 11,125 11,136 12,614 11,01 11,111 13.149 11.411 11,604 111113 11 1111 III lit Itkill 111111 Ilan Mn II win 601:0 I I II to Illllt Iurt 111111 till II Ili l II IIt ill nllit . N NEI 6001.0511 126 HIII IIH file 1201 1341 40 MHO 1449 1110 1315 file IS24 1514 1541 141 $?to atilt 1131:1 null uuM •11111 Muss Mall 111111 wits 111111 little err 111111 111111 u11rl 1111 111111 14 Lott ill At 1 1.101 0 li 11 11 11 111 152 112 Ili III M 411 414 112 621 is tun NON Nit 6Mr1112N 1.'011 site 125$ 11.160 11,561 121111 02.611 111100 13,121 11,111 11,111 16112 11 10 11,116 11,151 19 1101111 LNO h 010 11R 1,11 1,121 I,OO% 1601 I lit 1.111 1,511 i.M 1,921 6.151 1,» I111 1.121 1,11 1.141 1.111 H oil 1,01411 x10) Is Me $1,144 A. 411 Ir1LNl 141111 1e 1005 65.191 I. , :....V yin. yl ..1..W•w /rt'W'. : •'♦'-.A rJ.,aMa{A11M 1'Ne.W t 1 f J > fONAIIrlik SOLID 1AS11 mr01AA • MID COAAf! IAL~ 11:09:11 ~ a3~l6l1 II 1 10001 ~ K Sce^trea } ACTUAL ACTUAL II rT of (I It It 11 11 11 of t1 By It rf It 1910 1390 1911 Itf2 1191 1091 1117 1991 1111 1191 1111 1000 m1 2003 1001 1001 2905 I ?DIAL ANNWI CISIDALII 11.121 11.111 1,160 •'.0 ...0 .••0 . •,•1 1 Cu01c ttr01 Celbt40 191,t17 111,251 11,111 0 1 0 11 1 e 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ] Ir0 tu94e 101 I Cult 13.01 ILN 11.01 1.00 0.00 I Do Ii101 I DI 0.0 1.00 1.01 1.00 1,00 1.01 1.00 co 0.44 1 Ara All 1111 I lint 11;1 100.0 115.55 1.00 0,00 0.00 COWLS 1.10 1.00 {,00 1.00 1.00 LOP 1 0 LOP 1.00 1.0 1.10 I eowiciai lees 11,311 11.116 1135 IO 10 t0 l0 10 10 10 II it 10 10 10 Be ID Liss SAIcI11 P1ue 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 + 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 0 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 0 l9 D I 1 0 0 ! ...,i 0 { 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f II SUI'0Al • CU51 Ili 11,1!1 llJil 1715 1P 10 t0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 IP IP 10 10 I! 1 1 t 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 it I 1 1 0 P 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IS 0 I 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 D 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 19 ?DIAL 11VINVIS 17,312 11,106 035 l0 10 10 10 SO $0 10 10 So 10 10 it to 10 L101NOMRtn P SP Atnsll Iql (J1i 1301 1o 10 10 to IQ 10 ID 10 10 10 II 10 10 Is 21 JuOtlin 11 SI 21 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 21 AAinl6n6na6 US 121 11 I e 0 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 f It Willis 121 61 61 1 1 { 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 IS 1 t 1 11 691roRl t0 It / { 1 D 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' f luAllr 1 1 I 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 21 160 Drill. 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 0 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Il Bills Irallltri t1 11 01 33 1 1 1 0 1 { 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 ' 21 Alaln Irtofhrl OC 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 it tIt0111 Geuaf 611 775 111 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 I 0 1 Jo 101AL I(FiNSIS 0,311 CAP 1011 ....'o ....to ....if ....to ....to ....to .,..If ....ie ....'i b of II 10 if CAPIT A ....4' ....'o .....o ID 31 1111 0111 IlrJ ISO (ID, 151 ....10 ....oo .,..lo ...oo I II ID la fe ID to r1 01011 NON Doti 9PP01111 It hilt Assets 10 tll 121 10 10 ID 10 10 10 10 IP $0 10 10 11 to N j J5 OIAI Strikes 1 I 0 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 JI 17 Ask sk to tIN IN., : fl 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 runs 1 1 I 1 1 I ! I 1 1 I 1 1 1 ' JI Ines in IDrllns tat 1 0 t I 0 1 1 0 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 ( 1 71 1 I e 0 P { 1 0 ..1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 ....oo of 10 le if 101 NDN WII 'o 111 131 11 ID IS 11 10 it 11 ID ....'a ....'4 I. 101.PLR..m Opts fAl IL21J it,; 1; ..+5'1 ....'O ,..1;0 ....'O ...`o ....'O ...•10 it ...,`e ....'a if 111111 it 9 111 Itllll Iii 111 1:1111 11:111 I I II I I IIta1 112:11 stills Its III Irrllt 111: to 111111 Ili 111 t91111 211ts1 to Nil t1s1N/1LOSS I ISO IS6 oil I2 t0 10 10 ID 10 ID 19 10 10 10 11 10 10 VICKI IONS114 61111 ra911 aaa t:lm 2ll01 Will 111219 111111 111111 Milt 111111 211111 uml na11 mI11 111w 11611 11 AIACLA1 Cos 11 MIN JILL 111101 IS. US •100.001 1,001 1.00 1.001 $.lit 1,101 0,001 1.101 1.001 0,004 0 so% 1.001 blot 1.101 ' lr j 1 1 1 1 ~J 1 1 t LANOt I I I IAM Hill • 110 rOMtiC lit I II 110001 11;11:11 ( J 1 Q•1C'tt PC IX IC7Nl II re to II it II II it II h rl 17 n p p ulnnl/ 1111. ..1111 991 lilt 1117 1114 ills 1911 INI 011 1111 1023 InJ INt "Oil 1231 to Is ! tl In. 111,131 10,114 1.411 Mss lo,511 11.110 I1, 131 11135 11.115 90.111 12,411 IS,AiS v. til 101.111 IP1111 Nllll IN'Nt it] 111 1 J tr tell !1,111 11 al 21,111 29.111 21,114 11,111 .412 11,211 11,011 1,111 J1.111 !hill JI 361 36111 ,311 1[( tool 11113 11.111 111101 1!1.111 )lI 'U 164 Sol 11,114 221,W tBl,tl1 $7.412 31.111 71 736,121 211,111 311,111 311141 113,01 131341 141.111 361,110 I h om, I.nl I, III IJII 3,01) .,As 1151 3,111 1,111 1,100 2,111 1111 1,117 I,ul 1, SIJ 3,119 1,146 1,111 11231 to a S/f,17! 111.101 313, oil 311.11) 311501 171,141 If 1. Ill 111.121 411.001 4111!1 171,131 IJI,i31 451 193 all %1 411,13} 111,4Jl W, 111 I 011. L+ 3, IlI,RS 1.110,170 1161,113 3,111.191 1.105,141 1,911,117 1,111,134 1, 111, 1311, 171, 1111 192119! 4.111,3}1 0,161,013 1,11 1, 1111, 111, 111 I, IN, 111 I.1 ma 1,137,171 Us. 1 1 tentrrtI 41tl Ill Ill 110 093 171 111 031 111 1113 HAS 1131 IIU 1411 t tai l Fpl sit IS R 101 III 111 101 I!N 1171 1711 all 10 011111 I 101 lit !56 IN 111 111 M III II 11 271 111 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 I II II 13 If It 11 11 11 Its feel 111 241 i!1 110 371 7R 311 two 111 11) 171 111 of 211 311 311 411 14 Sal Fill IN Il! lit 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ t 1 1 11 l f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1141 Irv 1171 11.101 11.011 11,140 11,711 11,13 1•Ill 11,161 11.011 II,NI 11,115 II,I/S 17,'10 $1,161 MRS R,394 MISS. I7 1/ 101 lit 1171 11,109 11,090 Il,tlL 11,715 01,30! $1.171 11.14 I1,111 11 .Ili 11,011 It, 111 MIS SIM1 12,133 U,100 q,tis I r arcrttluip It r/lrorl 1211 1114 1711 !110 1170 lilt 1421 1111 1411 1111 11;5 Jill 1111 lilt RNs 1107 $llt IS Soto Ilet ti 54 41 Jr N N 11 41 It N k JI s! 11 It it II 11 Pilot Ill 131 111 lit UI 711 ISO 111 US n! 111 to III NI 324 141 all n it I 6rlvat RI 211 341 111 Ill IN lit III 111 no Il! 112 lit NI m $11 IN it Irnof anet ; II I' to I I I`; 1I If 14 11 l; 11 11 19 8 it it ! t! 111 o+Te I 1 I 1 I 1 J k 1 1 I I J 1 1 1 t tl AMU 181160! !I ll 21 70 3 tl 31 So IS 11 Is 1 11 $I 4 10 11 11 It If Akio ots 1 1 1 1 1 !t 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 OF 4 1 1 1 fl NOW plot 0114 Oell 1 1 fl U 1 1 I I 1 1 1 IS I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 It o111N1 1111 ills .1.1.11 .11.21 Itll IUJ IISI ILIA UJt 1901 Uri II,Nt 11117 I1,11t II,NS I1,N3 Ns/l Ii,lil 11,141 11 NR ►Itl Atr1N1 I1c3 ,•.1171 1•.1111 -;J3; . ",;;$I • ' CAI NL 1011 INN 101trSt1 pOl 1105 111! III! NII 1701 1}U •INI NIf ••1aJllt 0,111 I to 11110 kloll 11 10 10 11 II Ill Ill oil 121 M at 111 In IN IN 03 111 IJj It 1MI 123611! 143 211 tot 191 II' 111 I to la 051 CN IN NN AN IN 111 kl hl 1 it DOI 19I11n 11 1 1 1 N !1 N f 50 N 11 N N N N N N N N 11 lit on In Irle I 1 1 1 IS I r 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 it 1 1 lee to 11rl too 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 ( 1 OF 1 1 ' l/ 107 MON Doll it 1713 174 111) 1711 1111 1,. !111 1}11 ...1 . • • ..1. ` 1 1,1• Ills 111,1!1 RJs VIA 1111 1 11;1 PH Ills 11.1m II,IN 10111 01a1MN 1 11.111. ,11 11.1.. ......1 171 1.121 1,111 t,ON 1.111 1,111 11,01! 11a 1111 IM$ , L14 ' 1.031 Lilt 11,171 lilt I'm Smog 11ue 111111 :11ur run 11:111 nmr 111131 111111 112311 little nml 111111 111911 11111 11111 little. 123w It 1471 1Ailr1I0111 ml tial Mt$ II14 190 tiff 1111 OR 111111 lit 111 Ill 11111 IISII 111111 IINII of 1,1111 Will [,,111 As I'll [,till null 111111 Irbil 111113 sells unit Itlllt 141111 11!111 111n 1ir111 nitre 1 Ji tANS1ILL 4911 1,TS 3.011 1,001 100 1.151 J.IN LIST 1.414 LIN 91 IN I,Ali I.IN 1411 I.IN I.IN 1.011 1.123 UIf 1 t,al 1t!1014111 loll 375 3.101 1.o7O 1,110 1450 LIST 1.111 3,40 I,t4 4.730 0.150 1.131 4,151 4,10 IJN 1.111 0.110 i _ ,wa. „V ..i 1`<n w:'1'A ,d,!, IJ.I, ry ♦ i'1 F Y. .e,. e.. a . 4 i 1 i CJ SCF+~~NAR=O 5 I f i } 1 f E 1 i 48 i 1 ~n. ' iRFi1W S a.•iata~ 1 A i I i CODE, CR • COMM RETAIN LD - LANDFILL UECRFASE FILL LE - LANDFILL EXPANSION CS-COMM90LD LC - LANOFILLCURRENTFILL LI-LANDFILL INCREA60 CAD - C RETAIN OECRE"I LA -LANDFILL ACCELERATE FILL ON - DIRECT HAUL v CRE - O RETAIN EXCLUSIVE COMMERCIAL OPTIONS 100E 1003 1003 1001 1006 1606 1007 1906 1605 6000 1001 7097 M3 7001 3006 SCENARIO5 RESAATE 6915 909 606 10.16 1066 11315 1600 17015 171611.16 Itte 1613 U.76 Was 17.46 COMM RATE 111% 11110 113.76 176.11 133 61 13713 14104 1163 / 166,0 U<.4i77,N ICI t1 160 71 101615 706.66 1 CRD-LC-LE AN%"L) R I7 1771 (01 (5 13611Pn (770) -,LO=S) "20,J4 (III 0711 (1011 (1 ~ 6 i NPY INTimir 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 1 00 ` 0 0 E E 6000 SI/6) Cumw R if - {eo) {169) II7T ! 16 7 1,0311 1,731 foil =mum=1' ,67 1,7 1,; 1 LI fEE 0 - 0 0 0 16 I/ 41 64 60 61 60 66 a _jJj p ADIRANS 0 67 79 73 7f 11 I6 N t00 100 117 III 111 I 141 AO TRANS I. 0 33 31 31 76 31 10 43 40 40 a SO N e! M jI i i E J 1 •-iY~FMrYI, r. L ~.a-.•--...-.......a. . n-r. rr. rw"• ~Y. Y\o'4i°VSW hi :`a vN9e%4W N+2HY 01, $ra'W .+{h il`,$iY'~A ~I , 1 ~ - Moll RES RAPE & CUM REVENUE G/L COMM RETAIN DECREASE - LF CONSTANT - LF EXPAND 20 - 15 Z _ - - 0 15 10 RES RATE vi U 1 10 i i Y c ' CUM QAW/LOSS - _ `i-" f 0 ~5 t W 1602 1990 Zia ,966 1699 Oki 1900 19W 2000 2061 2002 2000 M 2006 1 CRDwLC-LE SCENARIO 5 i ..,.,.,..v:...w.,c:a.......+.wuw:.c w+...+~sti;nx,a ♦*r.vavw+.. 1 J 1 1 O b 1 ~ 1 1 1I1IDINIIK Salo Msit rlalpl" • ir11w Iw ILL iJ 11111001 IAO•It•l[ kwau 1 S lllaK 1rIIAl fl II 11 it fl ff II 11 11 If It fl fl h h IIH 1110 1011 1102 IfIS 411 Sit$ ,III 1112 loll 1950 1000 1101 7002 7011 tell 1001 ..L. 1 IvIAI "61411 tU111411l 111,132 INa61 111,111 111.511 111,161 111,111 II{,111 Iw,14 limi 80.111 f01,111 111,061 111,115 011,111 011,11! 311!1 t fullo tudl 611111/1 11,131 11,111 10,114 11,13{ Seem },111 IJ,JS1 15.1is N, 111 µ.1J3 11,111 11.110 13,124 100,111 101,161 IIf,,1f1 611 !11301,,11{J I Art MIC ill ) CNII 1.11 1.01 Lts 1.1! 0.15 4 1.1{ 1.11 1.4 Lib OAS I If 1.15 1.11 1.15 6.41 1.1 Pit Alt ItIl hull 0.01 1.31 1.11 911 1.11 is 11.11 WAS 51.11 11,13 13.11 11.15 1{.11 16.11 161! 11.11 11,57 1111"41! 6 to$ 01N11e till 113111 '611 IIJS fl t 11.174 11.111 11.150 1i,10I li,Sq 01,!11 11,116 11,I11 11,41 11,101 11,111 j4,131 11.11 In Sotcul helot 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 9 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 / I 1 I i1110IA1 • cusl Ill 11506 11,031 11.131 11,101 11 M 11,111 11,111 11.160 17,112 (2,111 11.14 11,111 11,131 afal will 14.111 11.133 10 sets of lftull Idol if is Ai 4 31 11 51 it If It 11 IJ 11 96 IN III 111 ' 11 lose. Its. I 1 11 3s 111 11 1 1111 11141 till) 17111 11101 14111 11111 11111 1411 11111 It IIn0Il11 hr 1 1 11 if fill 13 0 l Ill) to 1171 131) 11111 11711 13011 11611 11591 1 IJ 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 I 0 1 1 1 1 I 1 11,•,.. If IOIK lie$ P.Iit II,III QH1 021 (1,111 IM9 (?,Ili 50.!11 I2.Hj 31,!91 01.fµ 12,111 12,0!1 WON IJ.µI (1,121 lixt ItrI"I IIVA II It2nt111 1611 1711 lilt We 1131 till 1175 till 11.020 11,111 11,126 11.111 11,140 11.011 11.10 IL41, 11,111 If A"Sill I11 161 iN NI VI 14 he No IN 141 119 Ott 111 154 361 NJ 111 1) 011011mam 111 M ISI 19 HI 170 111 Ill NJ Ill 120 M fit ISO lit m 101 Illuulerl Ito 11 Ili M III IN 150 HI 211 151 its 011 Ili ill 211 tlf NI j If loslllnct N 11 if 11 N H N 31 12 33 it if if J) w If r1 ! H Wien 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 lot 1,111 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 limit 11204111 it mil 183 111 I!3 III M NI tµ SII Ill ill 611 161 311 µl µs ill 50 PAIN Irinfarl tt 1 1 II 11 01 It It if $11 4 fl 61 11 11 i3 it 11 lin011111uou11 ill 111 761 111 14 iH i{1 161 lie 101 tit ill 161 111 41 111 101 11 IOIK WIWI 2 !1,101 II,NJ 1l,f r 11,1)1 11.131 tLll} 11,110, 11101 11.111 01,611 Ua02 (1,011 11,fµ 10,111 13,1!1 µ,I11 (1,011, it oil UI 110AI1111 1!6' 111111 171 • IIS51 11911 11111 1111!) 1113) (4101 I;;JSI (11111 Ji1111 IIIOI (IWI 41,414 ,111111, •I04S1 (Or All NON loll 110LNS1 11 11"0 Pistil N Ili 111 IN 11 IH IN IN IN 121 111 IN IN IN IN IN 161 it MII Seems I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 i 1 2111"? Im"111 0 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 N ill in I" 111" 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 11 Imcr in hell" to 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1J Hl 101 VIA ter 10 ...Ui I 1 1 1 .....f .....I .....1 . . 111 mil 11 IN 111 IN 121 31 1 Ill IN Ill 171 Itl (11 We 1 31 lm ar f Aal m in U.1µ W. H; 1;.,;;; U,111 1114 11.111 µ,3t1 1!,111 It,l11 11,611 1,111 Il,IM ,NI Il,UI I3,ttl 13,I61 Ifdq 111112 little little 111111 ulttt 111111 111111 little rtl'.1 Iloilo Itill$ 111111 loll 111111 111111 Iloilo 1111+1 i 11 Aft CAINlIICII IH 111121 IN 0111 Ills) (fill (pill 101) (11111 111!11 IIt"1 111111 11611 111!1 Mill (11411 Will !Hill HIM 11114 10111 111112 111111 1111t1 11111t lltllf t11111 111111 111111 111lit tllllf I11tlI I1e111 11!111 to 111111111 11 1 2,511 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I Jt Iw MI 111 (4111111111 lit 1111 (11501 111111 111611 111111 111111 111,1341101aµ1111,1111 111.1111111,1111 111,141111.9011 111.1211 111111111111101111111 1.611 1.41 1.µl 0,"1 1.41 1.011 ?.set Lill 1,021 1.031 1,111 0,111 Litt 1.011 1, ill I.Im 114t folflol taw If 1110 !alit 10 Nil MUNI 14101 if 7511 111,1101 I I II 1 3 r } t f l ! COnnIACIAI SOHO asses AROCORNA - Cold OVO 11:0215 JI t 10001 LAO-Lli lunarie I S Actual ACIUAI It (I It F. It 11 fl 11 It it 11 If It If 11 , 1911 1111 1111 till IM 1014 095 1116 101; life 1011 2010 0004 2007 1011 1004 Has 1 1 IOIII ANKAI USIOMIRS if.iI 11.101 12,81 12,100 0,114 JIM? 11,111 11,111 11,101 11641 11,121 Wells 10.113 10,115 1,111 1,111 f,SU I title tied{ lellecbl 111,115 lit,2111 111,030 111.1" 111.121 111,126 161,110 114.541 161.151 151,023 154,10 ISI,2U 141,132 14S,151 142,143 15/,115 10,116 1 , I Avg topic II{ t Cult 1104 11.91 11.11 14.11 11631 1.11 slit 11.11 14.11 11.11 114.11 11.11 If.11 14.11 14.11 34.11 11.11 4 NIA 1111 ! Lott 11.11 106.41 II M 119.51 11111 1 1.11 1059 111.11 142.11 119.14 Iscis IU.43 In as Ill 21 510.31 114.14 201.1{ 4 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 0 R1V(NKS 1 (043110111 Iles 11,311 11,300 11,410 11,411 11,112 11,134 11,156 11,511 11,400 11.641 4,.415 11.111 11,541 11,116 (1,100 II.ISS 12,011 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 I0 I I 1 1 I I 1 I 0 I I 1 1 1 1 0 1 II S0101Al - LOSt HO 11.115 11,116 11,110 11.411 11,112 11114 61,1111 1I.S11 11,600 11,411 11.41$ 11.111 11,114 11,646 11,900 64./11 12,112 ~ Il 1111118 fit 0 11 11 N 41 of is 2 I I 1 I 1 6 1 1 1 IS 1 1 I 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 tl f 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 . 1 IS IOlrl IplNnll 11,111 it.422 11,511 11,511 11,560 11,51! 11,561 11,111 11.101 11,611 11,615 11.144 11,01 15,641 11,10 111151 12,011 { N GICIRINIIS J C 141+11811 1431 1376 1411 (ill 1143 1111 ISH 1139 1611 loll I11S 1119 3121 IHi 110 11,012 11,110 1111iolits 0 11 S 61 41 11 it 11 11 11 H 11 11 101 Ile M IN j II N1lnttoinc4 III Ill IA 165 110 115 511 214 tie 141 fit 261 01 Sal He Us 411 It IRtficis M 01 111 Ill II 11 14 11 1; Its Ill Ill 131 111 Ill 161 111 I 21loseli at 21 11 11 21 11 22 11 is it 31 0 3s It It to 41 44 11 WNdtt a I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 6 1 1 1 11 he IM I I I t I 1 A I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 11 AMIA Ironllorl SI 41 11 61 11 17 11 It Be 11 101 lot 111 121 OH 121 141 ISt i 14 IAIA 114111!111 It I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 2S 114111t topsoil 410 SSS $46 Us 511 S21 sit Sat its Ill All 60 1 660 ISI 143 NJ "1 25 tolAt 10INSIt• 11,211 11,10 41,401 11.424 11,406 11,112 11,501 11343 11,151 61,115 11,611 11,106 11.011 11.101 12,407 11,511 11.156 1; Nti WIN Moe IJO IIJ III! I31S 1154 101 151 ,14 111511 J1111 IIJ211 111421 111041 11OS21 IHHI (14111 11140 - J (0 AA0 00 Me 4101NU 11 Few Attila 36 111 141 I/O III 134 ISO sN 121 114 Ili 111 121 121 121 121 121 39 gilt leflu 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 36 Met taNeld 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 lit on Ill ;fin{ 1 1 1 1 A 1 I f 1 1 1 0 1 I 1 0 I If Intl to 1011161 toe 1 1 1 1 1 I f 1 0 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 E 14 fall lit Dill ltd $0 1 113 all „,11 lit Us 111 120 121 1114 126 121 Ill lit 111 "lit ' 121 JI 101 11,1114300 fill lit 11,111 111151 64,143 ILS11 Il,;ll 11,111 II,SH (1,{11 111115 I1.k1 1;,011 I1, 04 11,221 Il,J24 11,;71 11.416 1;,;11 I $fall Wale least$ 13.111 little Mall $11111 filial 111lll little little stills I111tt little allies 111211 [Sass Jo oil 14161110551 Ill 111 114 111 1111 HI H till) 01111 (15121 115511 113911 (14111 114141 111311 111411 Itill I 111111 irate filial titles 2711:1 little ISL S 111111 little 111111 little "Me tittle 111111 allies sml$ walls It Alitill 4640 14 all lilt 11.101 11.121 1.501 1301 1 lot J Sot 1.511 1301 IMI 5.001 1101 S.M. 5401 S. 00S 1.011 1.431' olLWW ) 191 y/-a~ r r 1 lIMO1 111 tAU]Wn6 ilFl~rS 0'm { 1 11 1 lo001 it it 11 rO0•t( it 6613'11 At I9$ I1 I II II if II fl It It 71 fl 11 II 11 h It } SeAdill S lilt 1191 lilt III) loll 1114 1113 lilt lilt 1111 1911 1100 Joel 7101 1003 Nol Joel i . I 111 111. 11,111 to V4 N1.N.I 11 ...9. 5 10,511 II,IH I1, ISI IL111 N.IIS 11.!11 11,171 11,01 0.426 109.111 IoL81 105,111 10cm 2 ll look . 111~2vJ 111,251 Ili.l]I 121,1 171.01 11118 Ili,lvl 111,511 RIAll 111,171 111,115 131,141 141, to 141.1sl 142,117 431,10 Buse IC One N, Ill 11.101 31.112 19.11 11.134 MIN 11,117 11.351 31,113 52111 1S,1J1 31,421 11,)24 J6,151 J1.401 11,311 30,111 1 tl 6/nt. 53.111 611'11 61111 613F ]I, 111 11,161 12,111 11,411 Full; 71,111 Win 12, IS/ 11,901 !1171 19,40 11.131 14,121 ' S II Plrp 1.103 !dot 1.196 1.10 1,071 IIli 1,102 1151 I'M 2.111 1.121 1,101 1,111 1111 1,511 1111 1.111 1 rot If 111,113 151.101 31 311,142 1S1 Id 155,111 151,111 19,110 341.110 Same 3N,I4S, !6,111 141,11$ 311,16f 111.152 171,136 111,',11 I We, it MINIMS 2.100,009 1. hr. 140 LIil.60A 4,80.1111NI,150 5,111,$131,111145 S.715 611'4.112,10J 1,111,111 1,143.451 I, 19.111 L 5%. 1511,/11,131 Illleuli 0 6Pnl,u1 Iles 771 711 201 771 211 116 351 351 SN Sol 111 ill 101 NI 111 514 IN 1 till Fell 61 11 11 it 141 101 105 lot 151 ISI SAO 211 I0 113 Ito 711 211 10 0161F list I { 6 1 1 1 J 1 II II II IS 11 li It IS 11 1141 Im 111 IN ISO 119 lot 341 351 h1 330 lot NI 421 131 ASI 111 Sol 141 11 lte116o$ 131 531 111 141 133 123 Ill Sol to% lit Ott All NI 651 All 611 iN IS 1 1 1 1 f 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 o A -111 "I'll "I'll i 2139111-0111 1021 11,10'1 11.013 11,101 11.1!1 (1,111 11,111 11.131 1141 11,111 11,661 11,00 11,601 ISMS 11.124 4141 0,111 N 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / l 1 1 1 IS 1 1 1 1 G 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 I II 101 Ito 1111 11,104 11,011 11,rol OLIN 11,127 11,111 (7.111 11,4tl 11,151 JI,IeI 11,111 11 Nil 31,10 11,111 h,WS 12,1P V[ 141/1011 omit id 111111{11 113 AM 1742 1711 01 Ult 1141 $JAI 1314 1171 1+51 INI 1524 1541 11It 119 Vol i i 1110t1hn JJ $A 11 11 0 11 41 II 41 It 11 $4 No N Aunt ti it q 11 1 Ill 111 Ill III ISI lit 171 111 291 hl 111 01 01 1% ill 511 he I I 10 5trv0cst 254 Joe 121 171 279 14 lit Ill III 701 III I11 111 241 t11 111 134 211111 1 51 II II II It 11 11 II Is II II II It 21 21 Jf 11 Witte 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11Ipl W1 I 1 I I I I I I I J 1 3 I l 1 l 1 11 61111 hl0dn6li tl 11 A ll 11 II 31 11 U IJ 11 61 It N 9 61 tl 1l Mike Innlut It 1 1 1 1 / O 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 )if 21IdnlIl 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 Jr 10146 or „ 1%& 1119 011 (I7A 1421 ohs 1311 1171 lilt list 01421 11,142 11.146 11,111 h,kl 11,471 11.!10 11 II1 Dr1111111911 1351 (111 5,11 IIN III! 1113 Ihl 1113 IS11 p0 !NI ISIS ISO; Olt 051 INS 1551 CAI Ally Fill 9111 Wiest it Flit] Hills le 10 0 11 11 III 11 r10 10 10 It 11 h II 10 II 15 0111 W o h3 111 NJ Ili 115 I0 tit ISI ASA 656 111 ISI ISI NI 151 10 11Odl1.II f I I loo lop 101 10 101 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N it Ito 00 too Not 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 { t 33 lot 16 lark In f 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 it 0111 Ali 1 1 is 43 Is AS 41 41 f 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 11 101 Dal CPO hl ISO •"IN 1 •'.1131 1121 1321 1101 ,,,011 ,..list lilt 1451 1151 •'.IISA 11156 „'lest •,,{W 1,111 . . U , . , IYI 01110110111 Ito ill I'm Loll ell el! i'llill 1,190 105+ 1071 1,136 1,511 1.611 ,..5,, ..0. 0 ..I.'., llf 1,110 1,921 1,021 MIA 1,111 Will urn{ marl ItInol 1471111 Will uuu little 11111+ 111111 null wet malt WWW urul cvWl 11e11 17 111 0010,161351 III1 11111 IN 111 11111 011 111 11 11111 Ill 1112) 11111 111111 111231 111011 1!1621 (11111 111411 stun [I'M 11tt11 :tort efltt Ollie Will title nllft [till, 111111 111111 little Illllt Mile IM0 !1 tW 111111 1.151 101 1 NI J DOI 1.051 1151 3.01 1.0S1 1.79 1.101 !.Set 1,501 1.lW 1.101 LS01 LISO 1.130 MAP A 10 I.IP11r111 I.ho I IN 1.001 1.759 1.630 LOS! 1.131 1.01 line 1.19 1,19 4.14 LISP !.ISI 4.111 LIST 6,21/ I uALU30,uW I I , f f 1 1 i 1 StCENARSO 6 ~ 1 _f / 34 CODE, CR - COMMRETAIN LD -LANDFILL DE PXMFILL LE- LANDFILL EXPANWN CB - COMM 601.0 LO -LANDFILL CURRENT FILL LI - LANDFILL INCREASE CAD - C RETAIN DECAEASE LA - LANDFII L ACCELERATE FILL DH - DIRECT HAUL CAE - C RETAIN E%CIUMVE COMMERCIAL OPTIONS W 110! 1603 1661 1166 1100 1011 1166 low 6000 1"t not 2003 100< 0006 j SCENARIOS FIE6RATF 166! 116 /6. 1016 loss 11.06 1200 lots 1/111 11,16 16,16 lots 16.76 11,64 47.01 COLMRATE 11!60 111.H 113.78 12111 10.1i 137.22 141.0 140.14 166" 164.42 17166 11181 10021 1N, If 416 CR-IC-LE ANN 041.) R_is (61) 1201 61 62 111 If 201 276 612 177 111 173 /42 1023 NPV INTIMIT 0 f 0 0 0 / 11 11 21 11 111 fN 163 sea 44 64 6,131 1102 m cm CID FEE R to (61) 110 11 /11 21/ 60~ oil 1.601 1,103 6,601 4.711 I 1 --1006 1,116 lW FEE 0 a 0 0 0 13 11 /t we 0i 00 Q W 11 [ ADTRAN3 C I1 70 73 71 It i1 64 100 101 113 121 110 121 t44 116 k AD TRANS L is /0 32 34 36 ri 40 43 40 41 61 M N 62 N 14, ,r II i e F 4 I 1 r~ r 4 1i RES RATE & CUM REVENUE G/L COMM RETAIN - LF CONSTANT - LF EXPAND i 20 - 15 f-- - - 10 c:. 15 RES RATE r 10 5 CUM GAIN/LOSS w 5 cc 0 .5 1967 ,989 1998 2000 2001 2002 2006 20" 2005 1061 1962 ,990 1861 1996 968 i I CR-LC-LE SCENARIO 6 1 1 aacv r+a 7 i RESIDENTIAL FOLIO 411511 FAOFOAM • STATUE M Se:2) II 110001 Ch-LC-Li ken4na f ACTUAL ACTUAL FI III Fl It Fl F1 F1 Fr 11 11 F1 IN I1 11 rr # 5019 it" 1111 5912 1941 1191 1195 1191 117 1191 1191 2100 2001 }002 2001 }001 2905 201,111 110.162 0 1 1014t 3 Cubit IMArosLCollecteaS 1N1lI 171,111 111111 111111 110,520 1 1,7111113,19 110.343 116,015 011113 12,611 0$,011 91,510 100 111 102,730 105 111 ID1 IN { 1 Awl cubit Its I test 1.10 1.41 1.13 IS LIS 1.111 LIS LIS 1.45 $.Is 1.45 1.15 LIS LIS LIS 0.15 1.45 4 Av1001111 I Cust 1.CI 1.31 1.15 1 05 1.15 10.111 1145 II-S5 MOO 12.15 ISIS 14.13 ISIS 16.25 16.11 11.25 IMS AEVIOUIS I S 111110ential Fees 01 sit 11,430 $1,154 11,764 Will 11.141 Simi 12,160 12,142 12,591 12,116 13,111 ISIO HAS 11,114 1,012 PAS 6 its Special 159699 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I a 1 I I 1 4 1 1 / a 1 / 1 1 i 1 1 1 t 1 0 0 I t 1 1 / 1 1 f 1 / 1 1 I svelar4l • CUS1 All I1.S61 Il.0 11,151 1,70 11.111 vl,fll 0.151 12460 12,:12 0,514 12.116 15731 110 4301 1J.616 14,12 14,233 19 LIB a1 WON 1441 11 IJ 45 43 SO 54 57 All of it 11 is 11 91 303 III III It Lail. Rev. 1 1 74 11 190 110 Its Ili 10 01) Illi $1 91 164 t7{ 01 221 12 Lrnahll New. 1 a 24 11 1 116 ILS 10 131 240 220 IOO 111 112 19 1411 t1 1! 0 a 0 0 0 1I 0 1 1 14 [DIAL AILS SIMI 1.601 11,197 SIM 17. 025 11,110 I 0,267 1.181 52,491 12,156 Il,lJt ISIS! (1,71! 14,00D 11,211 11.305 1, a61 LA tIFIMC1191L3 15 F4wr§0 1151 $208 1161 1799 toll 081 1975 1971 11,029 (1,011 51325 11,111 11.240 61,102 11.711 11.115 1].501 16 510o077 234 167 221 211 241 251 260 tit 290 Sol 314 321 141 151 361 311 Sol I} r o4Me 1155 29 711 1152 Ise 167 Ill 114 193 " 1 213 224 111 241 259 111 M 61 707 190 116 115 194 04 214 22S 234 241 260 210 111 301 11 si 51rvi w5:n 19 lnrminrs 14 76 tl 21 71 21 !0 71 52 73 34 J1 16 11 JI OO It 20 Wars 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 It 144 Debt 1 1 7 F 1 i I 1 I 1 ll AaAIA [IlMtlr{ CC 121 213 243 lit 263 214 M 1191 190 320 133 311 k0 311 511 405 all 1 IS AQtin 114061!111 cc 1 1 41 41 S0 $2 $4 54 9 to 62 44 11 It 73 If 11 24 (INMIL t6eAtl Ill 145 211 241 216 20 155 212 311 106 411 421 131 All Olt $22 S61 25 10101 MENSES 11'606 Will 11.10 11.911 $2,031 12.102 12.114 11.111 12,415 1:.422 12,712 St,161 12,916 11,115 03.231 11.441 13,41% 2s oil OF CKRAIIOAS IL 111127 121 !1111 11111 171 111 (112 161 121 IJIS IS4 (712 sees 1113 1162 1,043 CAP Ago PON Me Exples1 21 fixed estate it 117 111 126 11 120 120 120 121 120 121 021 10 IM 121 121 124 21 111 service 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 21 other expense I 1 1 0 1 1, 1 1 1 0 1 P 1 1 1 0 1 30 Not 01 Inv Irani 1 4 1 0 1 11 1 1 0 1 a 1 1 1 1 1 31 IftCr In Oorein0 CU 1 1 1 / 1 0 1 I 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 I 1 3} 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 t 1 1 . F 13 10 too OIL$ I0P 10 11 611 25 11 120 470 120 10 120 10 ins 120 021 10 121 to 36 101 OP I NOR OP 1F 11,601 0,105 11,11 11,991 1IMS Wilt, 12.114 12,319 Mail S2.f41 12,42 12.110 11.04 13.115 15,111 11.163 13,640 0202 12:41 1211:1 l:an 1::1:1 u:=:e 0,... :list lilexe taas arul: 0160 ntlti 642:6 :nua e,uu 0426 Jt Alt cA2M71t0S51 124 111141 Ill 11611 11201 150 655 1172 141 Me ISM 172 1171 Iles 113 1142 11,025 1::111 ::vet 11 :s; use:: :::::1 ;::..1 ::u:t ::L':1 19:2:s 331111 Miss :sells 8::121 tilers liter: 111111 :::18 1111111111 AT 1 1.501 1 1 a 0 1 1 11 11 JI 49 111 114 263 311 US 31 CUM AAM 111 tolAr11K1 112 11411 11611 11201 13 1211 1115 1505 Me 011550 1,453 13,500 14,111 IS,o35 1}.101 40 pOhlll 1116 to AIM BILL 1371 1 V% 6.004 1.001 0.111 1.111 1415 5.111 1.121 6.15t 7.021 031 1.15 3.111 1.191 1.12% as tit 11151.111 value 11 2000 1149 42 All 40IStll VALUE TO 2005 521443 t l1~ ~A. trlny r' raaeAAq i I+ I COMMERCIAL 101 ID NAVE PAOFOAIIA S7A1Us IUD 1 14. 56 2S A I Local CA-LC-ti AC1U41. ACIUAL 11 11 F I II II 11 No IT It Of II If P1 F1 Of 41MAr10 6 lost 1119 1111 1112 1993 19111 1995 1110 Illy 1191 1911 m 2001 100! not 2004 2005 I TOTAL ANAWL CUSIONER3 11,621 11.102 12,320 12 ,tll 11,IfS Il.1S1 IJ,I11 I3,I6S 13,101 11,151 14,521. 31,100 11,211 15,617 11,017 16,511 14,141 I Cubic woo Collec110 111,21S 174,257 112,034 112,101 113,115 115,312 111,102 19!,091 117,415 207.511 211,111 21J.221 211.111 221,114 23x,351 234,361 242,512 1 Avl cubic its I Cost 13.01 11.11 It 31 IA.11 14.31 14.31 14.31 Wit 14.31 LO.51 14.12 14.31 14.11 11.31 E1.11 10.11 II.JI 4 Nth Pill I list 11,71 100.11 115.55 III.SI 12111 121.11 132.51 111.21 142.04 111.51 156.41 164.12 112.65 111.71 110.34 111.11 201.15 S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 a 1 1 1 If 1 1 1 ' 1 6 4 1 4 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 U VENUts i lone CSel Flies 11,311 31.1111 11.170 11,571 11.51I 11.660 11,113 11,141 11.960 12.111 12.274 17,150 12,131 PIMA 13,161 it. N! IJ,SSI 1 1 0 If 1 It a 1 4 1 1 / 1 I I 1 1 , 0 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 0 1 1 1 a 1 1 1 1 1 Iu 0 a 1 1 0 1 1 It 0 1 I I a 1 6 It 1 { It SUII014L • CU51 PEI 11.313 11,516 11.410 11.571 II,S71 11.660 11.743 WHO 11,160 32.114 12.114 12.410 92,119 12,114 11.064 1!,501 13,551 / U LSChSI Fit 1 16 11 41 11 49 13 I 1 0 0 1 4 1 1 / 1 j IJ a 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a I I / { 14 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 4 1 I a ONo 15 ICIAI OWNUES 31,111 11,422 11,511 31,576 11,631 11,101 11,756 11,151 11,161 12,111 17,271 11,154 12,411 12,111 13,011 11,301 IS,S57 y1 UPENDIPURES VI Ili IClrdll 1421 1176 1411 1111 1117 1497 ISIA 1574 1617 1664 1715 1161 RUN 1191 1951 (1,032 11,114 11 suool5es 41 $1 15 51 14 01 61 It 17 It 111, OS 99 lei 111 121 121 1114ilLen/An LIS 171 154 IRS la its 111 211 230 241 261 217 Jot Ill 3511 IIS 414 II Jmicls 121 49 136 110 11 II 14 11 91 lei Ill Ill 131 141 151 211 175 20 2Asunnce 20 19 11 20 21 12 23 2S 26 211 it it 71 16 39 41 44 it SwAdrf 0 4 1 0 1 1 0 4 1 I 0 1 a a 1 1 I 22 110 Debt 6 1 { 6 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 1. ggg` 23 AOdA IrlNSln6114 at 11 11 y0 71 77 12 IN 94 IW 106 IU 172 In 131 111 lsI 71 Ad11n limfW1 CC 6 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 AN a 1 I 21 Landfill INDIM 430 SCS . 546 519 561 565 574 511 741 Ill 11! ISO 111 1.010 1.111 6,111 1.211 io 10TAL UPENSES 11,211 11331 17.406 IL111 11,134 ELMS 1 1.571 11.151 (1,041 11IMS 17.261 MU3 ill'su 11,4!7 mim 13,06! Wilt t j` 17 NE1 OVER AtIJ Ile IIJ 3115 Ilia 1205 1704 Ill! 1193 1112 11311 114 167 (121 1111 1201 I1J0 Ih4 1 CAP ANI lei DOER IAPCNS( 71 Intd Wall to 111 141 190 Ili 114 ISO 120 122 124 126 121 UP 121 UP 121 521 21 Debt $Ionicl 4 1 1 0 a If 1 a 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 !a OLlef 2111111 1 I I 1 1 1' 1 a 1 a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 J JI 141 OA 114 Inns 1 1 1 1 If 0{ 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 H Inca to ROthril too 0 1 a 6 a 1 1 1 1 a 1 a 1 1 1 a 1 1 JJ 1 1 6 1 6 1 4 1 a 1 4 1 1 1 4 / I i 34 lot 101 Will top 10 Ill 141 Ill 115 131 ISO 170 112 124 111 171 Ill 121 127 121 121 J5 t07 1PWN0111 OPEN IPP 13,213 1! 350 11.11{ 11,531 11,141 11,1!1 Il,4tl 11.171 111.171 17,111 12,111 12.111 11,!11 12,111 17,171 11,111 13.111 j u::n t:m.t I:at1 W:aW Will x:1::1 1:1:11 1:1111 :Inn Wass :eats Will MW: 11r111 lints taus 03r311 36 NET CA3AMOSS) 130 212 IM 141 1191 1110 IM 1113 110 IISII IIJI Ili 191 $fit 1231 1201 Pill? 3I ::1i x:xa Ixl:tl S:SL•1 1: 11 :11111 1:1:11 1:1::1 fir:il 1W:11 1::111 suite 1:W:) 1:1:11 la:13 1'.1xll SI MUNI 114 11 11111 Pitt 11.101 11.121 1511 3.101 LS01 1.701 1.541 ISol 3.101 5.001 5.WI 1441 1.0% 1,001 $.1101 1.601. ~ 1 1 N l 11 IANDFIIt PWOOMA - Wits 0W I+ ~ ? !1', S{r2S II 1 !0001 I CI•lt•ll ACTUAL 1[10.1 (1 f7~ f1 If f1 it 10 f1 I1 1} Il it Il fl ft j SceNrfO 0 1919 1970 1991 1992 9991 1114 ,995 3916 3991 1191 1999 2000 7001 2002 2003 2004 7905 1 CI An, I1,OJ1 71,111 71,191 29 its 1],570 11,•79 13, ISO IS,it$ 11,013 10,$11 92,110 95.49 91,511 100,117 102.10 1Is.411 34,119 2 CI Cau, ti .295 111,252 112,130 112.104 111,1{3 115, 17, 111,161 191.11 111,495 242.511 201,11 70,721 711,116 211,!91 70 1S 211.319 212,377 ' 1 to EMA 0,151 21.104 20,142 71,110 H,J11 21, 14 31,412 31,751 12,041 32,11t 11,)JO J4.621 1.501 34,151 31,102 11,;11 21,30 4 el (ant. 51,795 41,111 61,171 11,510 10,115 11. 61 11.132 11,61) 11,394 11.514 to its 12,751 (1,901 17,111 19,404 11,11 11,111 Cr DIRn I.IIS 1.916 1 .led 1,01 1,921 2,053 2,10 7,153 1,209 1,167 1,323 2,311 1.140 2,511 1,511 1,846 1,135 I lot 1 Cm. CC1 1,131,123 ?500,00 2,161.i40 3112S1114, 1'591,204 1.01.150 4,110,7411,721,!11 5,1114,330 4 W. 544 411.111 421. k 1 439.130 430.102 461.00 414.S16 491.922 21.142 1.51, 01 5,113,111 6,1 1,51 1,211,190 1,161,114A 1,12S,151 0,200.414 1. w.itI IC9[IWts Contract file 121 711 201 204 112 246 251 751 364 111 313 393 103 414 425 $11 311 1 IISa, Feet 69 10 11 31 101 101 105 101 157 351 111 164 161 171 lit 211 246 10 cmr fill 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 I) 11 It 12 12 11 IS 11 19 all loll 196 245 231 240 246 211 is$ 062 311 06 417 421 439 151 462 31 MI 11 Cell fell 430 SS$ 541 $44 Sol S63 574 Sol 101 lit 111 151 0S 1.1 LOJI 1,01 1,271 13 0 0 / . -•••,1 1 1 0 1 1 I 0 t 1 1 1 1 11 511110tAt air$ 1121 11,109 I1,DI5 11.11 11,111 11,110 Q,191 1022 11,510 $1,151 11,01 81 054 17,007 (1.060 12,111 02,112 12,01 is 1 1 1 1 0 ~0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 to I 1 I 1 0 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 y 11 101 A(1 $821 111,14 11,083 11,011 11,151 11,110 41,193 11,222 111510 11,151 1006 11,956 12.091 SIMI 12,113 $2.112 11.611 1 EIPINDIIUFII r If hrloll 1221 1221 1267 1201 1291 fill 1341 1361 1394 1424 1431 1191 $521 1511 $611 $651 1201 19 Seb011es 2J 51 41 11 Is JI 11 11 41 SO $1 54 la 64 61 11 11 20 Mint IJS 732 111 111 154 Ito 171 191 IS 21 237 253 773 710 11 342 Its 071 21 Sir r1 n5 ❑1 34 322 11 210 IH 161 111 116 200 215 12 219 M 211 $II 114 . 22111 1 11 It 10 II 12 12 1 14 1 11 11 If It 20 It 21 1 21, I6mbrr 1 1 1 0 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 j 24110 WE 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 Movie IreMl14 10 21 10 29 30 32 34 31 31 40 41 46 41 52 11 $9 63 H 1 26 able Iren51er6 CC It 1 a 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 7l lwinl IF 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 20101 141 i5e4 1911 $111 fell $214 1213 Ile! IIlS 1111 115! (I,d21 11,101 !1,311 Il,ti} 11.161 IS,gI I1 ,S10 21 NET OPEN RE9INUH 1255 (199 1211 1415 (313 1465 (121 131} 165] 2901 1102 1153 1121 1111 1145 111 11,111 CAI Poo 104 OPEI 1t1CRM 30 11194 AM4 so $P so 80 It 125 10 16 to 19 to to if of H 10 to 31 rill tend 243 212 702 391 IIS l11 164 160 6s1 654 I0 Its 10 151 ass 141 to I 12 land tletat6 f6nf 1 1 1 190 100 100 14 100 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 0 SI 11 Not an too trims 1 1 1 0 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 S4 lit Is sort 210 1 1 IS WE Retirement 1 0 IS 41 0 41 4S IS 4 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 / 1 1 It 101 NDN OPEN UP 1261 1211 $241 Site file 1119 9109 (121 0454 lost 1651 list 1454 1{16 fast 11,011 11.111 .....f. 37 101 00111001 loll top d71 31121 1,061 1,114 (,150 1,114 1,171 1.11 1.543 -I'll$ •1,610 .057 1,110 1.121 - 1,114 11111 1,SH :1:111 1M111 MMa !:list a:M1 Cme 111112 troll I M11 MW 1:611 x1341 :11:11 99311t Mast Mtue 1::131 11 PEI 41AIMr fill (1121 124 111 61 11111 1111 He (111 1240 1126 1191 111) 1112 W 11461 115 I lot11 Mats 634:2 MM:t MM ::::a :Morn 111.6 M IU 213411 m:t:t MM walls Mai 34-1111 11:9:2 :12119 34t6:: 1 L MW111 At 1.130 1.91 3.000 3.000 1.050 3.00 J.Iso 1.00 J.350 1.50 4.50 4. In I,Sol 400 4.300 4.150 1214, I forms 1611 ' 401AM01111 or 2,250 1,[DO 1.000 1,000 1,450 1,430 3.450 3.40 050 0.750 050 4.750 4,750 4.1s0 $.1s$ S, ISO 81250 f9N1,f.A5R,Orl r +e , Mal R A 11 i SCENAk220 $ i i i 60 I 9 lrtrdt-sc~ k r s' 1 1 f i i 4 1 CODE: CR -COMMRETAIN LD - LANDFILLDECREASEFILL L E -LANDFILLEBPANSION CS -C0MM SOLD LC - LANDFILL CURRENT FILL LI - LANDFILL INCREASE CAD- C RETAIN DECASAGE LA- LANDFILL ACCELERATE FILL DH - DIRECT HAUL CAE-C RETAIN EXCLUSIVE COMMERCIAL OPTIONS Irk- 1901 1902 19&7 1904 1906 1000 t997 1000 1094 2000 2001 2002 2007 2004 2005 SCENARIO8 RES RATE 105 905 105 1015 $055 1196 1200 1295 1785 14.95 1545 1825 1175 17.18 1705, COMM RATE 115 55 97.05 100.45 109 06 10700 111.27 115.27 121.02 121.01 197.44 14.11 147.11 154 47 102.19 174 k CRE-LI-LE mm "1 R_ 12 112) (291 t98 824 405 218 4u__874 912 1,114 1,000 1,464 1,207,_ ~,600- NPV INTEREST 0 1 0 0 e m 70 9819S 700 212 200 017 181 113 1.822 CUM Q*) R 12 1 (21) 108 441 991 1,274 1.151 2,850 2.701 6,207 0.107 0,178 10,141 10,102 5 I 2008 4,447 LIC FEE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 AD TRANS C 07 06 101 100 112 120 111 197 146 t68 108 t70 111 201 214 N AD 1RAN8 L 29 30 32 u 36 38 40 43 46 40 u 66 49 83 r r A RES RATE & CUM REVENUE COMM RETAIN EXCLU - G/L LF INCREASE - LF EXPAND 20 ~ 15 j 0 15 Cj a~ 10 RES RATE 5 ,a o ■f'f -f CUM GAINA-OSS ' r - - 0 0 - ,991 1992 ,98'.1 1904 ,895 1868 1697 ,668 1998 2000 2001 2002 2003 taw 20M -5 CRE-LRE SCENARIO 8 1 I 1 f 1 Nt51DIA11N fdL11 Wit YNNIOkAA - 514111: NNU 15'11;01 - II 1 1000) • LA f •l I.1.! 1 IV IV klnerie 1 AciuPt ACIVAI It It 11 f fY f Y 11 0 If P9 fl 14 fi i 1141 MO 3111 1197 1197 1199. 1191 95 lilt 1i11 1i95 1191 10000 7001 2051 NOS 311 2007 110141 409U4l tV7I0NtA! 01,557 115.144 176,711 117,107 111,061 111,711 165,116 111,111 193,111 70,111 205,171 lll,kt 1.16,115 117,111 117,101 215,771 1.11,151 I Cubic voids collected 11,031 71,114 79,411 MISS 14,S14 61,711 11,1St ISMS 11,015 10.43 12311 151011 11,571 1",111 I/1,731 107,111 1",142 I All Cubic Ids I Cest 1.51 67 $.AS 1.45 1.45 1.1 1.45 1,45 1.4S I.IS 1.4% 1.41 1.45 1.43 6,45 4.41 6.45 4 Ave M Bill I Cost 1.01 1.JI 1.15 1.IS 1.15 10.1 E1135 11,35 11,40 12.15 WIS 3145 15.15 16,25 16.75 11.15 MIS IEY(NOEI S Residential feu 11,514 11,431 11.154 $1,114 11.171 11,14 11,15' 121160 12.342 17,711 (1,111 IS,1J1 13.421 Wool 11,111 (1,151 14,231 f he Special Pickup 1 1 1 a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 f a 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 0 1 1 1 1 1 a 1 I 1 1 f 1 1 I lulrorAt • USE REV 11.514 51.631 11.151 61.164 11.711 11111 111951 (2110 17,711 02s14 12.141 65,31 13,121 11,601 17.114 14,172 64,111 II 21 NU 0E pill 0ties 41 43 IS 11 1 Si 51 0 46 71 12 I3 19 IS 101 III ail ` 11 (pee. Nev. 1 1 14 SI 117 ill 311 441 346 152 t1 477 431 Sit 410 ISS t1) 12 lendllll Rev. 1 1 24 121 26 134 132 In 1341 299 271 251 221 10 Ili Ili] 104 r 11 1 a 1 o a 14 W1AL REVS 11,632 11,611 11,191 11,186 (2,011 It,t51 17,511 12,111 17,721 1$,115 3.134 11,192 so. IN 14.135 16135 11,760 15,154 (tPE1DIIVAIS 15 hlroll 1611 Ml (741 1171 1111 t12 192S 1971 11.0111 111073 11,175 11,111 11,210 11,12 $1.361 11,115 111561 P It Rachel 234 1t} 121 111 241 25 261 111 790 17 114 321 140 134 166 313 197 w 1) 8llnlrntnts ISS 119 IS2 HI, II) ❑ 114 ail MS 213 224 36 111 151 212 "6 300 II f rvicet 131 If 167 101 lit 114 IRS 194 244 214 715 276 215 too 213 7l) Sol 191nsortre 1f 71 26 17 71 21 70 31 32 33 34 35 36 77 ;B 40 N y 20 hillre 1 1 0 1 of 1 1 0 a I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 71 Bad DeOt 1 7 1 / 7 7 1 I I I 1 I 0 1 1 I 1 22 Adeie Inns11r164 ail ill II! 253 263 271 INS 216 301 720 713 146 340 171 set 405 421 iJ Adele 7ramhrs CC 1 1 41 41 So 52 11 N 51 60 It 11 41 11 11 if 70 I 24 lmdlill license 196 145 231 210 Ili 249 Ill 261 )12 406 411 411 411 451 462 $22 141 s.... 25 10141 EAPENS11 11606 11,795 11141 51,111 17,034 17,102 12,114 12719 12,43S $2,427 11,111 12.01 12,!11 11,11S 11,151 11,441 11.625 3 It NEI Of OPIRAHONS '•1621 (11121 IN IS 2!221 Mo 1314 1IS 186 k" 1331 1952 (3,111 $1,120 11,411 11,111 O N CAP 44) 21 i R11 DII OPEN 11 ia` IN !N 121 170 1'A IN 111 121 111 121 171 Assets ts I71G31 (0 !11 114 121 12 12 f heed 21 0111. service 0 0 1 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 I 29 life 601011 1 1 1 1 0 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 B 1 1 Net OR ENV teat! 6 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 lice is WWI (O 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 6 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 32 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .1 120 ti 12, 120 . 120 .••fit •..120 1.N 121 •120 ...IN $20 IN ' 120 g 33 101 ICN OPEN Let .••.10 ,..112 No I 1 1 101 04 1 I@' :P E111 11,441 11104 11,115 11.111 12,045 12,12 13,214 11,100 12.455 12.441 12,162 11,1110 IJ.006 15.115 111177 11,461 11,641 f 1::911 1-:ell Sittig ta9:A $-list Men fillet saws :teMl Siegel lis:n :slits firth Israel tLfu little 11111.1 if ILI CA3MlILOSSi 126 111241 W 11121 11211 1114 1324 1447 1746 1461 1674 1111 11,164 111500 11,164 61,111 11,101 na:$ MM: lilies I:sa:l leet:c 11MIs 111111 settle x:113 Mali :Man alas Inlet M:ot nMa oven HMIs 11N1E4111 At 1 1.501 1 1 1 t is 11 16 lit 111 172 311 lit 16 113 31 (VM ANN Nil 0111110151 lit 11 11111 lit! 1441 1431 11,1114 101 12,1 S1 11,161 IS,NI I4,N1 0.121 111,141 11!,111 11 OERICl1 CNI 10 RtI BILL 1.511 6.171 1.001 6.101 m 1.11{ 1.510 $M% 1.121 6.151 1.1111 6,711 MA Lill 1.911 2.11% e 40 113 IR131At VALUI 11 NO 11111 41 NEI PREstei VALUI f1 INS $6401 I 9 1 f' j tV~Y6 ~A,~ t r ~ CpM[ICIAL lat$8 Usti IPOIOA11 - IIA7U1 n ' 15:12:91 I I 1 logo) ' P CA[•Ll l! ACIWI AGFVAI IV It IV rY + IS r9 IV 11 It it 11 IV It it 11 I 9clMrlp I ties 1190 1991 Ifl2 199S 11941 1975 3111 1991 1191 1119 2000 2001 2002 2003 and 2005 I ICIAL ANAUAI COSIOMEAS 11.4}1 12,103 12.121 t2,291 21,124 22,[71 22.931 23.411 21,016 21,611 25,112 25,193 21.111 27•311 2t,Ol} 21.115 t1,5t7 7 cubic tilde (ellectel 191.11$ 111,251 112.030 UO.250 241,159 261,11S 20,112 171,114 261,011 211,111 295,111 307,!16 111,205 211,410 2~1,It1 256,121 lIS,IM I All Cubic I01 I test 11.11 12,11 11.31 11.41 11,61 lLD 11.41 11.12 11.67 11.11 11.11 11.61 11.61 11.11 11.17 11.67 11.67 t Nth ISII I Cult 19.11 100.66 11535 91.45 10.45 101.11 101.60 111.31 It$,?$ 121,0! 121.W IIJ.44 [to 11 117.11 154.42 161.19 I71.$8 I 0 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 I 1 a 0 I e 1 1 1 0 0 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 e2Y[NV[! I tommerciel fen I1,S1] 11,386 $1.110 12.1811 12,253 12.169 12.161 (2.111 12.173 12,101 11,219 13,161 13,73) 14,026 16,3$8 11.01 15,135 I 1 a 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 P 1 1 1 1 1 • + 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 e 1 1 1 J 1 1 1 19 0 0 0 1 0 0 I 1 0 1 1 a 1 1 1 1 1 IS 3141101AL - [1151 REV It. $15 (1.311 11,610 t1,I64 12,751 (2.119 {},161 12,614 81,175 12.181 11,211 11,461 I3,IJI (6,126 11,351 S4,04 (5,035 12 license fee 0 II 41 60 do 49 13 7 1 4 1 0 1 1 1 / 1 11 0 0 1 1 0 I 1 1 a 1 1 1 1 1 1 t4 0 9 0 0 0 1 0 / 0 1 6 1 [ ; 1 1 I CS Is TotAl NIVENUrS Will 11.422 11,111 12.}12 $2,301 (2,371 ENP14011UAE5 11,411 12,119 12,171 12,941 13,219 13.461 13.131 14.026 11,!!1 14,0;4 15,035 16 hY1p11 $121 1176 1416 $501 ISSI 1572 1615 1661 1110 1763 Iola Isis 1953 11,025 11,103 11,217 11,271 1 11 Supplies 41 SI SS 70 13 21 12 11 97 In IGO 113 121 129 177 111 156 11 Melnlminte 115 171 Hi 111 too 111 201 221 211 256 175 296 319 343 361 391 621 11 services 129 61 136 609 603 )SO its 111 202 211 IS( 29 271 202 SIC 571 161 20lnsulinte 20 19 11 21 ?1 24 26 21 21 31 is 31 it 10 43 64 4, f 21 SuAdre 1 0 4 1 0 1 1 e 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 U Bit Lett 1 1 4 1 9 3, 9 9 9 0 If 10 14 If I/ 11 11 ' 21 Admit 1141111111 ee 41 11' O 91 lot 206; 111 121 tie 151 146 W 165 176 111 tot 211 { al Adein innthie CC 1 1 1 9 0 I~ 4 1 1 1 1 f I I 1 1 1 1 25 1+001111 E•PIAll 130 $$1 561 791 191 105 ill 111 191 1,211 1,111 2,165 1.601 1,471 1,171 1,665 1.112 li 26 WAS. EXPENSES 91.217 N.S39 $'1.102 G,O61 52,121 12.131 (2,06} 02,150 (},101 11.11! 12,151 U.III 11,271 II,IS3 (},641 13.991 11,311 I - 21 NEI OPEN 109 $so 115 1123 1141 1121 1264 1129 1469 JAI 1176 1262 1355 list 1571 1611 fill 172S tip $0 h01 Dole (121151 21 riled &"Its $0 Ill 141 195 Its $34 f 150 120 122 124 126 121 121 121 121 129 121 29 Debt Service 0 I 1 1 1 J 0 6 1 1 I 1 1 0 1 1 1 30 other Expense I I 1 1 1 a IN 0 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 It Not 00 [AV WAS I I 1 1 I 1~ 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a 1 32 hot is krAlnl Cq 0 1 I 1 1 1F 1 1 1 I + 1 1 1 1 0 1 it .....1 1 P 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 34 101 101 OPEN [IF 10 111 141 115 115 134j ISO 120 122 126 124 121 121 121 121 t21 121 IS 101 OPItIN90 OPEN UP (2,IIS (I,JSO it,641 ILIS9 V.1IS $1.161 12,093 12.1)0 it,ISO 12,116 17M Met 013.01 UAL 11,41) 11.010 11,$81 1::118 :::x31 1311:1 31:::1 :r l: Mess, ::11:1 1801:8 atilt If:-:T !:tilt 821[1 81:123 ISIS little 1$1311 111111 36 oil tAINiROSS1 I$8 I2] 114 153 1162 1240 01 1449 1346 sill 12]6 ISII 1411 ISIS 06)0 its$ 101 u a:: 211t$ ::8111 Sur2) 1:8:11 2$131 3:1!23 1:2:11 231:1 21211 1:1111 1:1911 11:111 -Mls 1'-0111 e:lelt -:I$t 31 PEICENI COG IN MIN Iltl 11.901 25.121 •It.021 3109 1.411 3.504 1.101 1.5611 1.001 5.004 5.001 5.001 1.001 1.009 5.001 SAN 1 C r.. 1 ' 1313100211 9R019AA4 • SIAIV! IJO I ; 1 it t Joal ' 11:17:01 t CAFIPU ACIVAI ACIVAI 1$ PI if PC It IT It II If If P1 II JI II If kinetic It 141 1991 1991 1992 f 1115 INI 1913 1911 1911 1911 1911 left loll 2011 loft 1004 7005 1 I C, IRS. 117 111 MM 71,494 J1,9JJ 91,f1f I1,109 17,81 15,IIS q, 113 91,111 92,611 91,111 1!,110 111111 107,731 103,111 101,10 349 ton. 111,295 111,152 101,110 211,251 211.131 711,113 711,112 111,111 01.111 will 211.111 413. I4 511,245 111,111 171,767 311,321 345.100 1 If toil 30.1SI 21,100 20,112 21,111 !9,131 i1,}tl 19,492 SIMI 37,111 11,111 31,139 11,911 13.514 J4.IIf 31,101 J1,111 11,10 4 it tool. 11.195 11,141 it. 171 3,961 1,111 1,119 1,291 1,472 1,462 1,111 1,061 0,217 1,195 1,111 1,143 1,101 1,415 S CI OtAll 2. lei 2,11{ 1114 1,911 1,113 1,111 1,102 2,11! 1.201 JAI 1.111 1,161 1,440 1,511 2,519 1.143 1,115 ! 11#1 41 30L115 151,004 161,111 311,702 311,106 511,50 HIM 104,117 414,14J 421,472 471,112 145,159 453,142 467,220 171,121 411,913 44,11) I too. Cl 2.1 ums 1,100,000 1,111,640 1,139,121 1.410 4,34.409 1,111,316 5,241,321 5,{29,1011,06':.1721,106,011 A. It I.313 7,171,591 1,901,1111,319,9551.901,176 01113111 I t41trlct fen 121 713 204 11 II 7S If N JI It 59 39 10 41 41 41 59 ! 1 C31A Fell 69 to 11 11 101 IDS III lei ISI 136 311 lit 109 111 01 241 241 to Mat feet 1 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 11 11 11 11 It if 12 16 17 ~ If W flat lot 241 131 141 141 119 213 262 SI! 4" Ill 421 IN 151 112 522 Set / li Cabo fell 130 313 14 ill 194 203 III ISO 191 1,151 1,111 1,165 1,101 1,111 1.411 3,615 1,012 ~ I! 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 O 1 II ;3TOrAt Ab9 1571 11,109 :1.095 01,133 S1.14 11.101 11.710 11,239 SIMS 11,105 11.951 12,101 17,06! 17,314 11,116 02,156 17,102 ❑ 0 1 0 0 f 0 1 0 4 4 1 1 1 f 1 4 4 it I I 1 1 1 1 0 1 4 1 1 1 A 1 1 1 I 1 0% 11101 RE? 1121 11.09 11.05 11,135 11,171 Will 11,110 N,U1 11,509 11,901 01.957 11,001 1!,061 62,111 17,111 17,431 12,102 It "OltJit'J _ IS 94em11 INS 1211 1241 0211 1291 1311 1341 1366 ISSC 1424 144 1191 1511 ISI! 1611 1651 1101 311YDOltn If $4 41 Sl 11 JI 11 N 11 !1 !I S{ {I 44 11 If 71 20 MIA! IIS 212 131 ill I54 164 171 110 20! IN oil 235 M ' 194 VI 117 111 1 11 hrrttet ISI Jel 122 175 M ISO III 171 SA6 NO Ili 131 241 211 Al 231 ISO 22 IRS 9 If 10 II Il 12 j 1 7 11 II IS if II 51 11 21 71 21 IS Irldt1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I !1140 Debt 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I t t I f 1 I 25 Ads(* Irlootoll 1 26 SP JI if if 34 it 31 41 r4 46 It 12 S6 S9 61 H 24 Odell IrIAdIr6 t 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 4 l I 1 1 f I 1 1 1 11 feint if It 1 I 1 1 4 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 j 210141 ISO 0561 191 1111 (676 Ill; 1111 UN 1125 0102 1955 11,021 11,111 41171 11170 III ,he 11,111 11,46 flip A o Nil polls PA1W1 2RE 1[313102FOS ...11'0 t le ...10 ...'=11 ...14411 11 15 I 1/11 ...till ...1620 ..194 ...1910 ...toll ...1111 ...1141 ...loll ...1111 .1.. { I ! 1,111 3 1 t 31 Doll !us lit ill 712 193 lit IN 161 160 654 611 As$ 14 1!1 to of it It if 14 654 961 102 12 t14d1111 uosorA 1 I 1 401 IN 104 lei 10 1 I 4 1 1 1 / 4 4 31 fit IS Inv (qd4 1 It I A A 1 1 4 1 1 If 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 34 one Is 11011 140 1 1 A 1 4 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 Debt 8411141401 1 1 43 43 4$ 15 45 45 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S6 101 IOA OPF4 (A INS Itll 1117 USA 1131 W; 1301 IS I! 1{34 1611 1110 114 IIS{ 114 36lt !bill 111111 if tot 6lIAM pit 179 3,121 I'm 1,114 1,150 1.031 1,171 1,611 1,147 1,60 3,600 11151 11110 0.021 1d24 bill 11541 949103 tilal 911311 223111 Will limn Little 099:81 hells 111111 111103 111ttt 3199!1 atilt Mill 711131 Mitt 31 Off bill loll 11021 124 $121 126 1134 (312 (107 IMP 1291 1717 1711 1721 114 1116 (1113 1161 ' awl Iittle :;ate 1::9:1 ::1112 Mill SIMI Mill estate tittle 1:11:1 ttt]tt Iat31 fast little e111ts !tills ?Still 39 LAW ILI AI I2" 5.411 3441 1.000 1w I.f4 - LISO 1.04 7.550 4. Sol 4.40 4.101 4,500 4, Sol 1.191 AMD 1.150 ICOM 4 8pl , 10 IAANIIt 01 1.750 1.100 1. Col 1 , 000 1 .450 1.430 1 oil 2.150 1.130 4,750 1.150 4,150 4,150 4,74 1.80 LISO 1.750 1 1 I wry of mrom, TS21 # MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76701 MEMORANDUM DATE: February 1, 1991 TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: Sohn McGrane, Executive Dieector of Finance r~ SUBJECT: Management Letter Responses i Attached are the responses by staff to the Deloitto and Touche management letter observations and recommendations. If you have any questions, please advise. ' r /pl I I 817/566.8200 D/FW METRO 431.2529 , UTILITY FUND Sanitation operations observation: A review of the operating results for sanitation operations for the 1990 fiscal year reveals a net loss for the year of $194,900. This loss increased the deficit in retained earnings by 93• to $404,500 for the Sanitation Fund from September 30, 1989. It appears that the current sanitation rates do not adequately reflect the City's costs in delivery of sanitation services. Recommendation: Conduct a atudy to determine the rates necessary to cover operating and nonoperating expenses and transfers associated with sanitation operations. The study might also include consideration of contracting with private entities as a means to deliver economical sanitation services. Response: The Utility Department is 'currently conducting a study to determine the sale of any or all portions of the solid waste operations. This study is currently being presented to City Council with various recommendations. ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES AND ISSUES Documentation of Internal Accounting Control Procedures Observation: The City does not maintain documentation of internal accounting control procedures. While it appears that control procedures are adequate, documentation of these procedures, with timely updates, would provide additional assurance that all procedures are being followed. Documentation would also assist in delegating accounting responsibilities and detailing the necessary procedures for meeting those responsibilities. Recommendation: Consider preparing an accounting policies and procedures manual. The manual would document internal accounting control procedures and assign responsibilities within the Accounting Department. Personnel in the Department should be given responsibility for maintaining the manual and providing for periodic update. Responses Staff agrees with this recommendation. Notification of Employee Termination observations The current policy related to employee resignations (Policy No. 112.01) requires employees to submit a termination form to their supervisors who, in turn, submit the form to the Personnel Department. No procedures exist to insure that the supervisors actually submit the termination form. Such situation could allow an employee to remain on the City's payroll or receive benefits for an extended period of time after the effective date of their resignation. Recommendation: In addition to informing their supervisors of their resignation, employees should suGnit the required termination form directly to the Personnel Department. Response: Staff agrees with this recommendation. r- J 1 ' xf I R' Responses to Management Letter Year Ended 1990 Page 2 ACCOUNTING PROCEDLRES AND ISSUES (continual) Federal and state Grants Observation: During the year a federal grant awarded to a City department was not reported to the Accounting Department in a timely manner. The grant allowed the City to match fund with in-kind services and donations. However, incomplete documentation was maintained to support the in-kind services provided to match the grant funle received. Recommendation: Develop procedures for monitoring the preparation and submission of grant applications as well as documentation requirement necessary to comply with grant uonditicna. The review process would ensure consideration of any cost-benefit evaluation and timely notification of the Accounting Department to maintain adequate accounting records. Response: There are procedures for submission of all grant applications 1 and review process of financial reports to comply with grant applications. In the specific case that was observed by the auditors, the procedures were not followed, we have since notified that department and they are currently complying with the procedures. 1 Fixed Assets Inventory } 1 Observation: The City has performed periodic physical inventories of fixed assets purchased with federal funds. However, a complete physical inventory has not been performed in several years for all City fixed assets. Recommendation: Perform a complete City-wide fixed asset physical inventory { to ensure that fixed assets continue to be accurately reflected In the } financial statements. Periodic physical inventories establish additional control over the City's fixed assets and assist in evaluating the City's insurance needs. Response: Staff agrees with this recommendation. Although the cost for I such an inventory has not been budgeted, each budget year a package is submitted but, due to economic conditions, has not been able to be Funded. Staff continually tries to update its Inventory with periodic checks, We will review the audit committee's recommendation of looking at the bar coding of assets and will evaluate the cost of such a program in the next budget process. INTERNAL AUDIT observation: Currently, the City relies on its system of in ernal accounting control and the annual independent audit to provide assurance that the financial statements are fairly presented. While this reliance is adequate, an internal audit function would provide an additional control level and establish a system which woali better monitor operations and the accounting system of the City. I lI VF- s Responses to Management Letter Year Ended 1990 Page 3 INTERNAL AUDIT (continued) Recommendation: Consider establishing an Internal audit function. Internal auditors' duties and responsibilities vary widely among cities. Frequently, internal auditors are involved with operational reviews and special projects as contrasted with the traditional role of financial auditing. The internal auditor should have no authority oear nor responsibility for the activities examined. In order for objectivity to be maintained, we suggest that the individual performing this function report directly to the City manager and report semiannually to the Audit Committee of the City Council. This type of arrangement should provide a level of I.ternal control through segregation of responsibility and give the internal auditor the authority ~I required to operate across departmental lines to beat perform the job. Response. Staff agrees with this recommendation, and has continually j submitted in the budget process, a package to fund an Internal auditor. E once again, because of economic conditions, the funding of such a position { has not been available. it f r P i E r i JFMcG:af 5629? 02/01/91 1 CITY Of DENTON COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For the fiscal year ended September 301 1990 Prepared by the CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS FINANCE DEPARTMENT CITY MANAGER Lloyd V. Harrell EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE John F. McGrane I ` d { h TABLE OF CONTENTS r Page 1 INTRODUCTORY SECTION: j Transmittal Letter i Certificate of Achievement............ Organization Chart List of Officials xii FINANCIAL SECTION: Auditors' Report. 1I General Purpose Financial Statements- t.. F Combined Balance Sheet - All Fund Types and Account Groups......... Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund 2 r~ j Balances - All Governmental Fund Types and Expendable Trust Funds........ 8 Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual - General, Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds. 10 Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes In Retained Earnings - All Proprietary Fund Types.... 12 Combined Statement of Changes in Financial Position - All Proprietary Fund Types. 74 Notes to Financial Statements 17 t. Combining and Individual Fund Financial Statements-and Schedules- Combining Balance Sheet - All Special Revenue Funds 46 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - All Special Revenue Funds 48 Combining Balance Sheet - All Capital Projects Funds 52 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in fund Balances - All Capital Projects Funds..... 54 Combining Balance Sheet - All Enterprise Funds 58 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings - All Enterprise Funds 62 Combining Statement of Changes in Financial Position - All Enterprise Funds 64 Schedule of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earning; -Budget and Actual - All Enterprise Funds 66 Combining Balance Sheet - Utility System,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,68 L Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings - Utility System 72 99 Combining Balance Sheet - All Internal Service Funds 76 1 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in t Retained Earnings - All Internal Service Funds 78 ~f Y f IJI No, 13' i l Page Combining Statement of Changes in Financial Position - All Internal Service Funds 80 1 Schedule of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings - Budget and Actual - Working Capital fund 82 Combining Balance Sheet - All Trust and Agency funds.. 84 Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities - All Agency Funds..,.,..... 86 Supplemental Financial Information- General Fund - Schedule of Expenditures - Budget and Actual 90 i STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED): Table 1 General Government Expenditures by Function Last Ten Fiscal Years..... 102 2 General Revenues by Source Last Ten Fiscal Years 104 j 3 Property Tax Levies and Collections Last Ten Fiscal Years 106 4 Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property 1 Last Ten Fiscal Years.. 108 5 Property Tax Rates and Tax Levies - All Overlapping Governments Last Ten Fiscal Years 110 6 Special Assessment Collections Last Ten Fiscal Years,.... 111 7 Ratio of Net General Bonded Debt to Assessed Value and Net Bonded Debt Per Capita Last Ten Fiscal Years 112 0 Computation of Legal Debt Margin 114 9 Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt . 115 10 Ratio of Annual Debt Service Expenditures for General Bonded Debt to Total General Expenditures Last Ten Fiscal Years..... 116 11 Revenue Bond Debt Service Coverage - Last Ten Fiscal Years 118 r 12 Property Value, Construction and Bank Deposits - Last Ten Fiscal Years... 120 I 13 Principal Taxpayers.. . 123 14 Schedule of Insurance in force 124 15 Demographic Statistics - Last Ten Fiscal Years 126 16 Miscellaneous Statistical Data 128 . I ~i. r 'I ~Rit'AAf~ ♦ td C, 4 A r- D ~ ~ r ~ ~ i L_ f, ~ L_ j i ~ i i i E k i t CITY of DENTON 12f5 E. McKinney l Denton, Texas 76201 ; January 22, 1991 10: The Honorable Mayor, Members of City Council and Citizens of the City of Denton Submitted herewith is a copy of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the City of Denton for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1990. The responsibility for both the accuracy of the presented information and the completeness and fairness of the presentation of the data, including all disclosures, rests with the City. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the enclosed data are accurate in all material respects and are reported in a manner designed to present fairly the end results of operations of the various funds and account groups of the City. All disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain an understanding of the City's financial activities have been included. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report is presented in three ; j _ sections: introductory, financial and statistical. The introductory section includes this transmittal letter, the City's organizational chart, and a list t of principal officials. The financial section includes the general purpose financial statements, the combining and individual fund and account group financial statements and schedules, as well as the Auditor's Report on the financial statements and schedules. The statistical section inciuder selected financial and demographic information, generally represented on a mclti-year basis. This report includes all funds and account groups of the City. The City provides a full range of services, which include police and fire ppot~.rtion; sanitation services; the construction and maintenance of highways, s ~qot; and infra-structure; and water, wastewater and electric utilities. Economic Condition and Outlook The economic condition and outlook for the City of Denton is proidsing, but the local economy has experienced a period of slow down. The opering of the new Texas Instruments plant in Northwest Denton and the expansion of the peterbilt Motors (Paccar) plant have both played a large part in maintaining the Denton economy. Over the last two years the City's tax base has grp,wn by only 4%, whereas tax base growth was as much as 26% and 13% in fiscal years 1987 and 1988 respectively. In July of 1990, Denton began the construction for the home of a Camping World facility, which is anticipated to contribute $4 million in annual sales to the local economy. Major economic development efforts during fiscal year -i- I L 4 r R~ 19 Transmittal Letter (continued) A Economic Condition and Outlook, continued 1989-90 also included final and serious consideration as a site for a new $700 million Matsushita electronics plant and a $46 million Food Lion distribution center. i The economic effect -of the new Alliance Airport in Denton and Tarrant Counties should provide future economic expansion opportunities. Alliance is located only 15 miles south of Denton on the Interstate Highway System on 35 West. M. Ray Perryman Consultants, Inc., projects that the Alliance _ Airport economic impact should include 9,164 permanent jobs in the Fort Worth PMSA, $702.8 million a year additional local spending and $234.4 million in employee earnings. MaJor Initiatives Although the future looks promising because of the economic development activities that are occurring within the City, the preparation of the budget for fiscal year 1989-90 was a difficult process. The City, encountering tremendous growth in the early 1980s, began experiencing only limited growth in 1989. The loss of property tax values in multi-unit resid,,:,,tial and small commercial units was offset by industrial growth gains. In preparing the budget, the City knew that fiscal year 1989-90 would be one of continuing y challenge. Past growth had placed enormous strains on manpower, equipment and - infra-structure. The flow of revenues that had accompanied growth trends was r~ stagnating by the slowing economic conditions throughout the area. Revenue bases that would typically be expanding by annual increases of 10% to 15% had slowed to 1% to 5%, and in some cases were actually declining, especially in the building activity areas. It was anticipated that this situation would only be a short term condition due to a more diversified economy and, as hoped, the metroplex economy is once again on the upswing. Commitments by manufacturing firms and other developments mentioned earlier will add significantly to the employment and revenue bases. Long term projections for Denton still indicate continued growth and expansion well beyond the year 2000. The 1989-90 budget challenge was to stay poised and ready to handle the future expansion without drastically reducing current service levels. In all funds, personnel additions included those positions that were determined a priority by the City Council, were absolutely essential, or would pay for ' themselves through increased revenue collections. In addition to the uncertainty of federal, state and local economies, a conservative approach was taken in budgeting both revenues and expenditures. Despite a generally conservative stance, the budget maintained the level of service which the citizens of Dentoh had come to expect, as well as included some maiar initiatives as determined by City Council. Overall the budget was viewed as a positive plan in light of the local economy. A total of 5.4 positions were eliminated to help fund a net of 23.1 new positions in the General Fund, 17 of which were for public safety. This new public safety funding initiative included 5 new dispatchers for the new E911 system, 6 Pew patrol officers to continue new community or'ented policing programs, a 3-member narcotics unit, and 2 grant-funded positions for drug awareness and child abuse efforts. f 3 ` ± 1 Transmittal Letter (continued) Major Initiatives, continued Other 1989-90 major initiatives included park service enhancements with regard to boulevard/median and athletic fi0 d maintenance, as well as a Geographic information System (GIS) with support in the form of a new GIS data base administrator. City salary adjustments were 4% for all job families except for office/support, professional, management/supervision and executive levels. these job families received a 2 112% adjustment. For the Future - As indicated earlier, the City has embarked upon an economic development program with the philosophy of attracting industrial prospects and expanding existing companies. The establishment in 1987-88 of the Economic Development Office and the development of a utility rate incentive program should help facilitate future growth and attract industrial prospects like those mentioned previously. The Utilities Department has also established within its Capital Improvements Program (CIP), a $500,000 assistance program to aid in the construction of water and sewer lines for industrial and residential development. In addition, the Planning Department has developed the Main Street Program, which began in the 1988-&9 budget year. The Coordinator works in conjunction with the State's main street program in order to revitalize the downtown area. The Capital Improvements Program (CIP) has been developed to maintain and expand the City's Infra-structure. The CIP plan calls for expansion of the library, two additional fire stations, expanded parks and recreational facilities and the building of a new law enforcement center. The CIP also ; plans for maintenance and improvements on existing streets and the development i of future streets within the City of Denton. In addition, the CIP addresses a master drainage plan and will assist in the development of traffic signalization throughout the City. The Utilities Capital Improvement Plan includes the building of a new water treatment plant. This improvement, along with the opening of Ray Roberts Water Reservoir in 1988-89, will provide adequate water supply to the City well beyond the year 2400. Financial Information ! The management team of the City is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure designed to ensure that the assets of the City are protected from loss, theft or misuse and to ensure that LJ adequate accounting data are compiled to allow for the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The internal control structure is designed to provide reasonable but not absolute assurance that these objectives aro met. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that (1) the cost of the controls should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived, and, (2) the valuation of cost and benefits requires estimates and judgments by management. Sinale Audit As a recipient of federal and state assistance, the City also is responsible for insuring that an adequate internal control structure is in -iii- I i r 1 M Transmittal Letter (continued) Single Audit, continued place to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations related both ? to the state and federal programs. This internal control structure is subject to periodic evaluation by management and the outside auditors of the City's financial statements. As a part of the City's single audit, tests are made to determine the adequacy of the internal control structure including that portion related to the federal financial assistance programs, as well as to determine that the City has complied with applicable laws and regulations. The result of the City's single audit of the fiscal year ended September 30, 1990 provided no instances of material weaknesses in the + Internal control structure or significant violations of applicable laws and r regulations. Budaetilo Controls The City maintains budgetary controls to ensure compliance of legal provisions embodied in the annual appropriated budget approved by the City Council. Activities of the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Debt Service j Fund, and the Enterprise Funds are included in the annual operating budget. Projected financial plans are adopted for the Capital Improvement Funds. The , level of budgetary control (that is, the level at which expenditures cannot legally exceed the appropriated amount) i, established by function activity within an individual fund. The City also maintains an encumbrance accounting system as one technique of accomplishing budgetary controls, and a technique of budgetary 'lock out' which will prevent a transaction from exceeding legally appropriated budgetary amounts. As demonstrated by the statements and schedules included in the financial section of this rzport, the City continues to meet its responsibility for sound financial management. _ i General Governmental Functions The following schedule represents a summary of General Fund, Special Revenue Funds and Debt Service Funds for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1990 and the amount and percentages of increase/(decrease) in relation to prior year's revenues. The amounts in this schedule are expressed in j thousands of dollars. i Increase % of Percent (Decrease) Increase Revenues Amount o Total from 1989 (Recrease) Taxes $188997 72.77% S 423 2.27% Licenses 6 Permits 261 1.00 38 17.04 - Franchise Fees 577 2.21 (18) (.30) Fines 4 Forfeitures 1,258 4.82 25 2.03 Fees for Services 10298 4.97 0 .00 Interest 749 2.87 (60) (7.43) inter-Governmental 1,481 5.67 (201) (11.95) Miscellaneous 1.48¢ 5 U i (26.32) TOTAL (1,43)% -iv- k FSM1` 5 Transmittal Letter (continued) 1 General Governmental Functions, continued 1 The most significant increase in General fund revenues from a continual - source was again in the tax category. This increase is attributable to a small increase in property tax valuation and the tax rate. The property tax value increased marginally by approximately $641 thousand as compared to the 1988 tax year, and the tax rats was increased from $.5928 to S.6183 per $100 of assessed valuation. The second largest tax source is sales tax which increased $40,000 from the prior year. The City receives 1% of the 7 1/4% sales tax collected on sales occurring within the City. The category of revenues that is associated with building activities, (i.e., inspections, permits, licenses, etc.) was down by $24,000 because of the continuing decrease in building trade activity. The miscellaneous category of revenues rose primarily due to healthy investment earnings and an increase in charges for street cuts. The following schedule presents a summary of General Fund, Special E Revenue Funds, and Debt Service Funds expenditures for the fiscal year ended y September 30, 1990, and the percentage of increase/(decrease) in relation to prior year amounts. Once again, the amounts stated in this schedule are expressed in thousands. Increase % of Percent (Decrease) Increase e r. enditures mount of Total from 1989 (Decrease) Current: General Government $10,470 32.03% $ (372) (3.43)% tt` Public Safety 10,185 31.16 1,035 11.31 4 Public Works 41,228 12.93 (139) (3.18) Parks 6 Recreation 2,646 8.09 248 10.34 Capital Outlay 575 1.76 171 42.33 Debt Services: Principal 2,263 6.92 (10051) (31.71) Interest 6 Fiscal Charges -13 7.11 128 5.83 0.06% As in the prior year, the primary reasons for the increase in operating expenditures were salary and wage pay for performance increases and increased health insurance costs. Additional public safety and beautification programs also accounted for expenditure increases. The significant increase in debt service expenditures was due to debt issuance in 1987, 1988 and 1989. In December, 1986, voters approved a $21.6 million Capital Improvement Program that was to be phased over a five-year - period. The first of the five ennual bond issues of $3,500,000 for General -v- T V V~ I Letter of Transmittal (continued) A General Governmental Functions, continued Obligation Bonds was sold in April of 1987. An additional $1,600,000 of Certificates of Obligation were issued during the year. Of this amount, i $500,000 was for airport improvements and $1,100,000 for a city-wide radio communication system. The second of five annual bond issues of $3,600,000 for General Obligation Bonds was sold in March of 1988. An additional $775,000 of Certificates of Obligation were issued during the year for Motor Pool vehicles. Also, as part of the acceptable 1986 bond election, $3,615,000 for General Obligation Bonds was sold in 1989. These 1989 bonds were sold for the purpose of street and traffic control improvements, drainage improvements, park and C"A library system improvements, fire station :onstruction and equipping, and law enforcement/court building construction. Additional $1,155,000 and $1,550,000 in Certificates of Obligation were also issued in 1989 for improvements to the ' City's Municipal Building and Civic Center, equipment and machinery purchases, GIS computer napping, telephone improvements and garage improvements. i General Fund Balance The fund balance of the General Fund increased by 13.8% in 1990. The fund balance provides the City with an average of 46 working days of expenditures. However, $337,302 of the balance is reserved for encumbrances. In addition, within the unreserved portion of the fund balance, $518,649 of the balance is designated for subsequent year expenditures. t Pro rte arv Oo, er_ a Enterprise Operations The City's Enterprise operations consist of a utility system which provides for electric, water and wastewater services. The Enterprise Operations also include sanitation services for residential, commercial and landfill operations. In the Water Fund there was an 8.5% rate increase which raised the average monthly eater bill, based on 10,000 gallons of water, by $1,70 per month. Wastewater/sewer rates increased 8.5%. This new rate will cause the average monthly residential sewer bill to increase from $13.34 to $11.75, resulting in a $.41 per month increase. A water rate study is presently underway to determine the cost allocation and rate designs for specific customer classes. Electric rates experienced no increases for the year. I 1 The Sanitation Fund had a rate increase of $.25 per month for residential customers. There was an $,08 per cubic yard increase in rates for commercial 1 roll off customers, a $.02 increase in rates per cubic yard to permit r customers, and a $.09 increase per cubic yard for contract customers using 4 compaction equipment or bringing in building material to the landfill. The rate increase was necessary to compensate for the surcharge of $.50 per ton mandated by State legislation. This surcharge will help fund the State Health Oepartment's landfill permitting system. -vi- 6 i ~ v: tw~ Letter of Transmittal (continued) Proprietary Operations, continued Internal Service Operations The Internal Service Operations consist of the Working Capital and Motor Pool Funds. The Working Capital Fund accounts for the finanri,n, vi ycods and - services provided by the Municipal Garage, Warehouse and Macnine Shop to other City departments. The Motor Pool Fund is responsible for the purchase of City vehicles not budgeted in other funds. Fiduciary Operations Expendable Trust Fund The Employee Insurance Fund accounts for the accumulation of resources for the payment of insurance policies and employee insurance claims still outstanding. Agency Funds The Agency Funds consist of Payroll and Deferred Compensation. The Payroll Fund is responsible for the collection and payment of the City's payroll and associated liabilities. The Deferred Compensation Fund accounts for City employees' investments in a deferred compensation plan. Debt Administration At September 30, 1990, the City had $26,846,730 in General Obligation Bonds outstanding, $53,659,188 in a Note Payable to the Corps of Engineers, $270,000 in Contractual Obligations, $4,995,000 in Certificates of Obligation and $58,610,000 of Utility System Revenue Bonds. Thu Contractual Obligations are used to finance the purchase of equipment on an annual basis with a three-year pay-back period. The city has maintained an 'Aa' rating from Standard and Poor 's Corporation and an 'A-1' rating from Moody's Investors Service, Inc. on its General Obligation Bonds. Utility Revenue System Bonds have maintained an 'A' rating from Moody's Investors Service, Inc., and an 'AF' rating from Standard and Poor's Corporation. As was mentioned earlier, the City has developed a plan for issuing annual General Obligation Bonds that were approved by the voters in a five-year capital improvements plan. The Certificates of Obligation are used for short-term construction projects and financing motor pool vehicles. The City also anticipates issuing utility system revenue bonds for the construction of a new water plant at the Ray Roberts Water Reservoir. Cash Management J The City follows an active program of cash management, keeping all temporarily idle funds in interest-bearing accounts. These accounts are in the form of NOW accounts, certificates of deposits, U.S. Treasury issues and J Federal government agency instrumentalities. On August 311 1990 the annualized yield on investments was 8.229, compared to 8.729 and 7.14% for the same period in 1989 and 1988 respectively. investable funds as of -vii- ti a Letter of Transmittal (continued) Cash Management, continued September 30, 1990 were $79.2 million, which is an increase from $56.2 million in 1989 and $48,5 million in 1988. Investment maturities have been lengthened from 58 days in 1987 to 868 days in 1990. As of September 30, 1990, the City's average yield on investments was 8.26% compared to 8.58% for the same period in 1989. The City's investment policy is to maximize yield with a minimal amount of risk while maintaining an actively competitive yield on its portfolio. Accordingly, all of the City's deposits are either insured by the I Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance j Corporation, or are collateralized by governmental securities. All collateral on the deposits is held by a third party financial institution's trust department in the City of Denton's name. The investments of the Deferred Compensation Fund in which the City participates are held separately from s those of other City funds by an outside trustee appointed by the City. State 1. statutes authorize the City to invest in obligations of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. agencies, obligations of the State of Texas and related agencies, - f repurchase agreements and municipal securities of any state rated "A" or above by Standard and Poor's Corporation or Moody's Investors Service, Inc. Risk Management During 1990, the City continued its risk management program for the City 4v of Denton. In 1987, the City contracted to have an actuarial study to project the City's property, workers' compensation, and liability casts over a five- ; year period. The following schedule represents the projected costs as done by the actuarial study compared to the actual costs that the City experienced as of September 30, 1990. This schedule, as presented, is expressed in thousands. Workers' Program Property Comoensatigg Liability Cost Transfer FY 190 Projected $50 $229 $303 $582 $30 FY 190 Actual 51 218 172 441 35 As part of the comprehensive plan, the City does participate in a self 1 insurance fund for its property and casualty liability, along with workers' compensation benefits. Reserves are being accumulated in the fund to meet r potential future losses. In addition, the City's risk manager has initiated various programs to control risk and to train employees in safety standards for the prevention of future losses by the City. Independent Audit The City Charter requires an independent audit of the accounts of the City by an independent auditor. The accounting firm of Oeloitte 6 Touch, CPA's, was selected by the City Council to perform the annual audit. In 1 addition to meeting the requirements set forth in the City Charter, the audit was also designed to meet the requirements of the Federal Single Audit Act of 1984 and related OMB Circular A-128. s k i i -viii- r 7 4 Letter of Transmittal (continued) Awards The Government Finance officers Association (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year ended September 300 1989. In order to be awarded the Certificate of Achievement in Financial Reporting, the City published an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report. This report satisfies both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements, The Certificate of Achievement is held for a period of one year only. We believe that our current Comprehensive Annual Financial Report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement requirements and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate. The City has also received the GFOA's award for Distinguished Budget G: Presentation for its 1990 annual appropriation budget, receiving its highest rating to date. In order to qualify for the Oistingulshed Budget presentation }i Award, the City's budget document was judged to be proficient in several { categories organization. in The including has lsubmitteduitst1991nbudgetntocthe GFOAatoidetermine its eligibility for another certificate. We believe that it continues to meet the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award criteria. Acknowledaments I would like to thank the Finance Department staff, the department directors and division heads for their diligent efforts in the preparation of the annual financial report. A tremendous amount of time and effort went into the development of this report, especially by the Finance Administration _ staff. I would also like to thank the City Council. It is their strong leadership and faithful support of the City that helped make the presentation of this report possible, incerely, i ohn F. McGrane Executive Director of Finance ; -ix- J 1 Certificate of Achievement for Excellence r in Financial Reporting r Presented to City of Denton, E Texas For Its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report r for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 1989 A Comfkaw of Adgrm wt far Exca wwo b FrwcW { Ram thwo is prasand by dw Goy mmmt Fkwo Mon I Assoele of dw Umed Satan and Canada to 9owmnx A mb and pubic wr@&4re -e*- i t 1ySw M whM CMVr# w w anrwd hw%W L np" (CAMs) whww dw h*mt Itardaan in VMMVwfl MancW drgceauntlnp L N ~ lam, L aradar ~ . E Eva"DNft 9 i II } I t CITY OF DENTON ORGANIZATIONAL CHART nn:EN! 0f DCN1cN CITY COUNCIL Cn1 ~1~OANCY YuN iPAL AWA CITY MANAGER ~ OCHEM OOVEMRNi an MOVA". trtevnnc ocrcra atcume arcroa tucu++~t nNrcrw arcurnt aOF vmfiiu m PLMW YO W 09ml tar li N fl or r"Mcc of WN I n we roust awNCt AM* w N wrv ~owi pow OVIT ou zr aer ,gro~renc .K.. Acme e+ama wontcnaa ~N~rUVS[ KNS~WC1 tNC1<t nWd Mldl 0"o COrtNrMrM W4, Ii IMI vmw S1ME15 'W 1 A1VOM~ [uSMYtR S[xNCt ~ y~... E17rMMMR' S0111ctr yu trAxtwKNdf SCM iR I i i 1 i r~ 3 nr F CITY OF DENTON - List of Principal Officials September 30, 1990 Elected Officials I Title Name Mayor Bob Castleberry 4 Mayor Pro-Tam Randall Boyd Councilmember Jim Alexander 1. Councilmember Hugh Ayer, Councilmember Bob Gorton .n Councilmember Jane Hopkins r Councilmember John Trent 1 City Officials j 1 Title Name city manager Lloyd Y. Harrell 4i ' Deputy City Manager Rick Svehla r ' Executive Director for finance John F. McGrane 3 Executive Director for Utilities R. E. Nelson Executive Director of Planning and Frank Robbins Community Development Executive Director for Municipal Services and Economic Development Betty McKean City Attorney Debra Drayovitch L. Police Chief Michael Je: L Fire Chief John L. Cook City Secretary Jennifer Walters i i I j -xii- Ii M' r Rv KJ P Deloitte & buche 601 Cherry Street. Swte 2340 Metro 1817) 6542777 Fort Worth, Teas 76102-66Y ! 7e!ephore 18171347.3300 f INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Denton, Texast r We have audited the accompanying general purpose financial statements of the City of Denton, Texas ("City"), as of September 30, 1990 and for the year then j ended, listed in the table of contents. These general purpose financial j statements are the responsibility of the City's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these general purpose financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial r statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes axaslaing, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the general purpose financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by saaagament, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the general purpose financial statements present fairly, in all material respects the financial position of the City at September 30, 1990 and the results of its operations and the changas in financial position of its proprietary fund types for the year than ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. s Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole. The combining and individual fund and account group financial statements and schedules listed in the foregoing table of contents, which are also the responsibility of the management of the City, are presented for purposes of additional•analysia and are not a required part of the general purpose financial statements of the City. Such additional information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in our audit of the general purpose financial statements end, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects when considered in relation to the general purpose financial statements taken am a whole, ~ December S, 1990 Memp r DRS Intemational -1- ~ a i~ CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINED BALANCE SHEET - All FUNO TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS i SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 i i Goverwental Fund Tunes • i 3 Special Debt Capital SETS AND OTHER DEBITS Genera) Revenue Service Pr c s E-- Cash and deposits (Note 2) 3 8,066 fti 524,657 { 76,753 3 616,094 ` Investments (Nate 2) 4,324,004 - 164,050 10,102,001 ! Receivables (net of allowances for uncollectibles)- Tazes 668,975 - - - G"s9 Accounts - - - - I Unbilled utility service - - - - Special assessnrnts - - 89,111 - Accrued interest 71,354 9,113 225,153 j Other 402,264 11,601 - - Out from other funds (Note 11) 474,254 335,000 - 5650000 Out Fran other governments - 184,648 - 28,342 i Merchandise Inventory - - - - f- Deferred bond Issuance costs - - - Restricted assets Note 4) Cash and deposits (Note 2) - Investments (Note 2) - - - - • Accrued interest - - - - Due from other funds (Note 11) - - - - II Advance to Sanitation Fund (Note 11) - - - - FIKed assets (net, where applicable, of accumulated j depreciation) (Note 3) - - - - r Anount available in Debt t Service Fund - - - - J Mount to be provided for !t retirement of long-tore liabilities - Total Assets }~1 and Other Debits =S.9ae~417 tjaQ illd~tr~ +-r i The accompanying notes to financial statements are An integral part of this statneent. p f 1 u~ -2- u ~ L J t r i ' Fiduciary Totals proprietary Fund Types u T e Account Groups- r, Trust central central Internal and Fixed Long-Term September 30, Septemb~r 30, Enterprise Service Agency. Assets jL&bl Ilies 1990 19 1 164,887 = 12,064 3 848,019 S - { - f 2,312,540 = 13,149,821 39,490,720 4,422,505 2,968,237 - - 62,071,511 35,763,374 666,975 609,774 4,955,141 50,722 - - - 5,006,463 4,403,341 4,983,232 - - - - 4,983,232 5,514,295 G 89,111 186,153 943,156 - 50,511 - - 1,300,541 888,625 6,1,983 - 46,334 - - 1,148,182 128,615 ^r 8,934,111 - 664,500 - - 10,972,865 1,543,813 212,990 167,715 1,554,934 1,560,648 - - - 3,115,582 1,891,560 930,642 - - - - 930,642 890,641 567,308 - - - - 561,308 51610,311 14,010,244 - - - - 14,010,244 6,130,112 734,193 - - - - 134,193 84,308 - 323,322 - - - - 323,322 - 500,000 F 500,000 - " 143,268,823 2,920,995 - 16,123,207 - 222,333,025 215,001,526 122,476 722,476 101320060 30.234.920 _NIH •530 16,760 :~uaas.~ ssoza~ s'-s~ ~~.~23.201 smsua3~ s3u.~ea.~n sim.ilG.L'~ (Continued) ,i r i 1 CITY Of OEN71`~s COMBINED BALANCE SHEET - EPTfrBER 30. 1990 AlL KIND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS (CONTINUED) i Ooverrrnental Fu T s LIABILITIES, EQUITY _AND OTNER REO[TL General Special Debt Capital Aevenue Strvlc Liabilities; Pro s Accounts payabf♦ and accrued expenses : 629,8S3 = 45,111 RetainaQt payable _ f 96T ~ 102,195 Accrued vacation and - - 150,495 r sick leave (Note 4) I Deposits Payable from restricted assets 65,000 _ r (Note 4)- , Accrued Interest Aevenue bonds Payable, i Current - f f I Out to other funds (Note 11) 342,200 Advanet from Utility 88,120 $6J,A40 Fund (Note 11) Werrtd revenues LIASet Payable (Notes 4 and S) 161,819 11,361 218 190 Gtntral obligation bonds - 42,351 Payable (Note 4) _ Certificates Of obligation - - (Note 4) RtvtnUO bonds payable (nit - - Of bW discount) (Note 4) Claim payable - Not1 Payable (Note 4) Total Liabilities = The accotpanying notes to financial stattmtnts ere an integral part of this statw"t, 5 r -4- i ,04 rya I 3 C r r d Fiduciary Totals Proprietary Fund Tvoea &A.19261 Acco Lt Groups - (Memorandum Only Trust General General Internal and Fixed Long-Term September 30, September 30, ii Cnterorise Service Aping Assets tl llab sties 1990 1989 w i 4 2,714,923 S 268,354 $1,303,800 1j - f - $ 5,385,503 $ 8,528,013 117,641 - - - - 268,618 341,119 CJ 445,573 21,469 - - 2,393,124 26860,166 2,674,008 1,137,794 - - - - 1,2020794 1,070,226 1,570,449 1,163,379 1,510,449 - - " 3,022,850 - - - - 3,022,850 2,553,200 8,931,364 1,360,663 - - - 11,296,187 1,543,813 $00,000 - - - $00,000 - 433,721 641,052 35,218 - - 60,163 95,981 100,266 - I,OSS,371 - - - 25.668,509 26,723,880 26,833,530 + 20430,000 - - 2,835,000 5,265,000 3,115,000 1 $5,1100000 - - - - 55,110,000 38,610,000 923,459 - - 923,459 53.659•lM 1 (Continued) J i r / 1 r.,r w w,~ E ti CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS COMBINED BALANCE SHEET - All FUND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS (CONTINUED) w R 10 199 $EPTEMBE ~verrmental Fund Tvoes - ; Special Debt capital LIARM IE5, EQUITY Service Proe ' General Renenu ANO OTHER CRfDlTS i Fund Equity: Contributed capital- CIL From other munfcipallties 9 9 or govermrntat units In aid of construction Investment in general fixed assets - Retained earnings- _ Reserved for bond retirownt (Note 1) Unreserved - Fund balances- 122,116 - Reserved for debt service - 1,831,956 Reserved for encumbrances 337,301 1510761 - 8,5/1,511 _ , Reserved for capital projects - - Unreserved- Oeslgnated for subsequent " Yeats' expenditures 3 $10,649 753,SS3 Undesignated Total Equity and 1 ] 04 - 11 1 7 17 10 7 r r Other credits k4~ Total liabilities, Equity and Other Credits >}~9s 11 $JAL%" 1" SIl R M' The Accoxonying notes to fioanoial statenents are an integral part of this statement. L 1 i 1 7 1 Rv ",owl i r r- Fiduciary Totals Proprietailr Fund Types Fund T s Account G u s J"randunt On1yl Trust General General Internal and Fixed Long-Tom Septa*or 30, Sapt1 er 30, Entorprlsa Service en Assets gglitles 1990 l k = 14,903,082 $4,167,171 3 - f - f f 19,070,259 18,787,418 21,432,263 210091,310 V 21,432,263 - " 76,123,201 - 760123,207 70,339,128 10,441,768 - - - 10,441,768 8,653,741 45,821,627 124,053 - - - 46,64S,660 41,311,442 I` - - - - - _ 2,321,019 2,906,332 ~ i - _ 8,54!,574 11,567,832 1,272,202 1,262,144 2,350, j.244, 5,371.60 50.402 76,12M ~ 142,4N. r 92.598.1/0 / 1 2,3 Sula,+~.~ t9a~ifi.931ti =lss3.641 =]~1i3.2~i fiCa~i27iffi +~41.53iailQ ~~o.LOr.1~i i f ~ 1 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES £XPENDITUR£S AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES MHO EXPENDABLE TRUST FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30 1990 3oyerm+ental fund Types Special Debt capital General Revenue Service Prois REVE,UES: Taaxxes 615,223,831 6 - 63,1]2,998 6 - r LFCens s and penelts 261,080 - - - French se fees 517,186 - - - L,. - fines and forfeitures 1,257,651 - - Fees for services 896,275 48/,731 Interest revenue 566,677 9,755 164,169 759,206 Intergpovermantal 4510936 1,025,733 - 11,176 Contributions Miscellaneous 145.847 431.612 225 / Ft.631 Total Revenues 19.98S.406 1,951.96 44 16j •808 _10,0_13 L, EXPENDITURES: Current- 8,982,092 1,488,290 - - Public safety 10,078,851 105,965 - General Over"" Public works 4,228,457 - k Parks and recreation 2,159,550 186,142 - Other - w - Caapth tiny 120,923 153,798 50503,091 ~Pri ncmrit I pppaaleret i rennt 20263,092 i Interest and fiscal charges - 2.323.350 Total Expenditures 25,069,873 2 34.195 4.SA6.44 EXE£XPENDITURES REVENUES OVER (UNDER) (5.884.387) (282.334) (118.634) (4,113,004) OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES): L_ j Proceeds of long-teen ebt 1+150+000 Operating transfers in 7001,400 108,194 9,050 - operatling transfers out 111 F" Total Other Financing - - sources (Uses) 6.160.299 400,494 9,050 1,150,000 EXCESS OFF REVS PEMD 07HER SOURCES OYER OTHER USES $75,412 126,160 (1090584) (3,563,084) p- FUND BALANCES - October 1 4,114,133 1B 1 1,133.060 13,936,614 FUNO BALANCES - Sept«dAr 30 Wsa.M 6 91W 6.,ZZialia r.. TM Accoepanying notes to financial stateiaeents are an Integral part of this statenrnt. i -8.- 1 ;k Totals Nemorandun On1 fiduclary Year Ended Fund Tvx Expendable SeoteaDe ~ S.~t~er 30. 1989 : _ L' 16,496,832 $10,514,210 261,080 222,146 577,186 594,142 1,257,651 1,232,166 1,381,006 1,298,20 222,754 1,730,161 2,150,24 198,645 1,715,110 j 1,9,552 5,251,111 9,552 2 251 6 CIE. ~ 4 050 T 1 5 589 y-~ 1 82 3,037 31 178.205 33 1 10,4700382 10,8424100 10,184,816 9,150,314 4,228,457 4,361,287 2,645,692 2,397,948 4,151,602 2,998,660 1,451,602 6,017,818 6,124,529 2,263,092 3,314,161 _ _ 2 323 SO i 4.1S1.602 12 345.209 41.169 maim) 11 1117 ) I 1,150,000 4,015,000 ' 7 418,944 6 543,421 .T 511 011 }R) 9.979.620 1 _ jam 131,435 (3,139,161) 1,881,960 a?~yyg WPM ~Rn. z f l4 1~ 127r246.926 i t~ _1 ! r ~,1J ` WWI CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL - GENERAL, SPECIAL REVENUE AND DEBT FO RETHECFISCALSY(EAARRTENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 General Fund Varlanca- Budt -Actual Unfayjrable) I REVENUES: Tt~xes 115,189,890 $15,223,834 lt33 944 censes and permits 224,700 261,080 = 36 300 Franchise fees 594,000 577,186 (16,814) Fines and forfeitures 1,256,619 1,257,651 1,032 fees for services 1,061,985 0% 275 (185,710) Interest revenue 425,000 568,677 143,67) Totergovermrental 484,953 454,936 (30,017) J, Contributions - Miscellaneous 50! 611 14i.047 244.233 Total Revenues 19,758,761 19,985 06 226,725 EXPENDITURES: Current- E General government 9,822,264 8,842,222 980,042 81 Public safety 10,100,382 10,057,268 43,114 Public works 4,228,823 4,134,093 91,130 Pares and recreation 2,235,629 2,161,405 116224 r Capital outlay 396,326 342,157 53,869 i_ Debt service- Principal retirement - Interest and fiscal charges _ r Total Expenditures 26,703,421 25.$40.445 1,242,979 t EXCESS Of REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 17.024.663) (S.554.454) 1,469.104 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES): Proceeds of 10 -tenor debt 0peratin transfers in 1,014,663 1,QQ),400) ~ Operat nP transfers out I [541.101 1 Total Other Financing Sources (uses) _7.014,W .6.460.299 (S51.364) EXCESS OF REVENUES AND OTHER SOURCES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES 110,000) 905,340 915,340 FUND BALANCES, October 1 3 4_ . 73,955 -4,114,133 700,178 ' FUND BALANCES, September 30 1.iJ63a99i 1.S_.U 1LA15,31A The acc onpanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement, L J l -IO- k is y 1 1' r Special Revenue Recreation Funds Debt Service r Variance- variance- Favorable Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Budget Actual (unfavorable) 3 - 3 - _ - $4,414,2S8 $3,1720998 =(641,260) 610,35( 417,752 (1521549) - $04 $04 95,000 169,169 14,769 - 6.126 6.426 225,041 221.041 j 16 0.351 424.682 1245,669) 4_.509.258 4,167,908 1341.4 50) 621,486 474,270 147,216 - - 14,090 26,815 (12,125) - - - - 11760,000 21263,092 496,908 2,416,135 16,135 2,323,350 153.385 635,576 $01,085 134,491 5,236,135 4,586.412 660,293 _34,715 (16 103) (111,118) 1127,477) (418.634) 30,1141 9,050 9,050 9.650 9,050 r 34,715 (16,403) (1110116) (127,411) (409,584) 317,893 1 76.267 16,267 - 1.163.586 1.132.060 (S1.526► =1L1.Qli :_L1341 =WLli9) 4,56.103 s.,~22.12b s.36Qa~i i 111111111M i ~t ~sl J owl CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS COMBINED STATEMENT Of REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANCES IN RETAINED EARNINGS - ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Proprietary Fund Trues i Enterprise 5irvlcil j OPERATING REVENUES: Electric service $62,680,319 1i - Water service 9,134,904 Sever service 5,263,661 Charges for services 3,695,917 5,036,151 Sundry 162,749 27,394 Total Operating Revenues 01,531.550 5.064-,151 OPERATING EXPENSES: Purchased power 42,345,467 - r ` Fuel 1,402,344 - Purchase of water i Salaries and wages 9,32S,765 $84,311 Materlals and supplies 1,198,132 2,795,411 Maintenance and repairs 3,078,466 24,412 Depreciation 6,525,810 1,386,259 Miscellaneous 2.066.895 218,034 Total Operating Expenses 65.942.869 51060,551 _ Operating Incas (toss) 15.594.681 (4,402) NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES). Interest revenue 3,641,119) 245,302 Othirest expense and fiscal charges (S 2~26~0;5511 (!141:163) Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) (1,899,407) 34,645 r Income Before operating Transfers 13,695,194 30,243 r i... OPERATING TRANSFERS (OUT) (6.703.172) - Net Inew 6,9920022 30,243 RETAINED EARNINGS - October 1 49 ,271.373 693,810 RETAINED EARNINGS - September 30 $9JU i S }2.~ r The accompanying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement, L1 . I l.. -12- L Ii I 7 z r Totals i (Memorandum only) Year Ended $00tember 30. 1990 5Sept"er 30, 1989 562,680,319 f63,9%,395 i 9,734,904 8,572,433 5,263,661 4,567,069 8 190:613 8~612.100 ~3 6 01,101 85.A13.S99 - 42,345,461 44,312,841 1,402,344 2,535,134 ; 91910,136 9,6189;963 3,993,609 1,141,095 3,102,878 2,186,892 1,912,069 1,168,427 2,344,919 .2.911.124 11 0 1 / 73.101.003 15,590,219 12.05615% 3,893,081 2,464,736 (S 1304 453 ,1 (S 009, T3) (1,864,842) (2,051,423)n ( 13,125,137 9,199,113 6 71 . 03.112) ISAM.620) I 1,022,265 3,231,553 19.965.18] 46,130,630 f j J i i .13. r i - PF -w-- _W F. I` t CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS COMBINED STATEMENT Of CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION - ALL PROPRIETARY FUNO TYPES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30 1990 Proprietary Fund Types Internal - Enterprise 5arvlte SOURCES OF WORKING CAPITAL: Operations- Net locome : 6,992,022 1 30,243 Items not r qulring working capital- Deprec at~on 6,525,810 1,386,259 =rtitatlon of bond discount and expense 39.995 - Working Capltal Provided (Used) ? by Operations 13,551,921 1,416,502 Proceeds from Issuance of long-terra debt 21,049,315 - G Contributions- 340,953 In aid of construction Proceeds from the sale of contractual obligation Total Sources of Working Capital 34,940,095 3,0.56.502 I USES OF WORKING CAPIpTAAL: pp Reductlonoof long-lane debtant AM equipment 2359:4200 1,070,705 Net change in tonq-term assets 500.000 Net change in restricted assets and liabilities - ` payable from restricted assets 2,511,407 Total Uses of Working Capital 13,737.1 I .S83,766 Net Increase In Working Capital 1 . 53+.ia~ ELEMENTS OF NET INCREASE IN WORKING CAPITAL: Increase (decrease) in current assets- f Cash $j4 ,1105,221) 1 (132,1154) Investments 3,018,010 229162 Accounts repairable 101,410 19,210) G Inventory 9611,111 5,311 -ilL4441 Other current assets 4,924.15 Increase in Current Assets 24,113"W 1,562, (Increase) decrease In current 11abi1ities- (20,145) Accounts pa able and other liabilities 1106, 4 Meter deposits 132,5611 Due to other funds (2,113:315 (19,241) Oeferred revenue Increase in Current Liabilities (3,602.106> (99.692) 3 Net Increase It. Working Capital IZLaZ,lpagSS ILliZa3J] I!I 1 The accompanying notes to financial statements are +n Integral part of this statement. r I w N a t 1f r E I A I 1 Total$ (Memorandum jj Year Ended Seotember 30, 1990 September 30. 19A9 i 3 1,022,265 Z 3,234,553 1,912.069 1~1 GI 14,974,329 10,401012S 21,049,315 53,664,813 1, 50.040 226,724 50 38,014,597 64,496,122 9,251,238 60,546,172 3,058,200 2,660,550 500,000 - 2,S11,407 1,300.599 15,3 20,925 450731 Qu s--~as~► I {15,S3A,018) =(8,481,340) 225,530,112 90218,05 1,224,022 1 ~4,491,154 1 26,395,410 .-].OM2 126,5696 (332;00' ' 1132,66 (1,254,067 (3.101.7961 (172.591) f~~ f.~.lLS931 t -15- I ~ ~ ~ , , k_ r► r ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ Q i E- r, , C F'. W ~11 FBI t"+~ 6- u i t s III. t Ir ~ CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS f' NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS r+ FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBL'R 30. 1990 (1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The City of Denton ("the City') was incorporated September 26, 1866. The City operates as a Home Rule City, under a Council-Manager form of government and provides the following services as authorized by G its Charter: public safety (police and fire), public works, parks and recreation, electric, water and sewer utilities, sanitation, and general ! administrative services, The financial statements of the City include all activities for which the City exercises oversight responsibility. The criteria considered in determining governmental activities to be reported within + the City's general purpose financial statements include the degree of 1 oversight responsibility exercised by the City Council over the activity or function; the City's accountability for the entity's fiscal matters; the scope of public service of the entity and the nature of any special financing relationships which may exist between the City and a given governmental entity, t The accounting policies of the City conform to generals accepted accounting principles as applicable to governments. The following is a summary of the more significant policies: A. fund Accounting The accounts of the City are maintained on the basis of funds or account groups, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity. The operations of oath fund are summarized by providing a separate set of self-balanting accounts which comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues, expenses and expenditures. The following funds and account groups are used by the City: Governmental Fund Types General Fund- 1 The General Fund is the principal fund of the City. All general tax revenues and other receipts that are not allocated by law or contractual agreement to some other fund are accounted for in this fund. T ,.J ~i -17- N i I 7 1 i P Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1990 From the fund are paid the general operating costs, the fixed charges and the capital improvement costs that are not paid through other funds. Special Revenue Funds- The Special Revenue Funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources (other than special assessments, expendable trusts, or major capital projects) that are legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes. These funds include the grants from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (Community Development r Block Grant) and from the Texas Criminal Justice Division, Department of F Education, the recreation fund and miscellaneous other revenues. Debt Service Fund- The Debt Service Fund accounts for the payment of principal and ! interest on general long-term liabilities, paid primarily by taxes levied I by the City, and for the payment of principal and interest on capital ` r J leases in the governmental fund types. + Capital Projects Funds- The Capital Projects Funds account for the acquisition of capital facilities being financed from bond r proceeds, contributed capital, or transfers from other funds, other than those recorded in the Enterprise Funds, the Internal Service Funds and the Trust Funds. Proprietary Fund Types Enterprise Funds- The Enterprise Funds are used to account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises where the intent of the governing body is that the costs C (expenses, including depreciation) of providing goods or services to the 1. general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. These funds include the Electric, Water and Sewer Utility Systems (Utility System) and the Sanitation operations, internal Service Funds- The Internal Service Funds account for the financing of 1 materials and services provided by one department of the City to other departments of the City on a cost-reimbursement basis. These funds include the Working Capital Fund (vehicle maintenance, warehouse and L machine shop) and the Motor Pool operation. I 1 i h I, I^ Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1990 Fiduciary fund Types Trust and Agency Funds- Trust and Agency Funds are used to account for assets held by the City in a trustee capacity or as an agent for individuals, private organizations, other governments, and/or other funds. These include Expendable Trust Fund (Employee Insurance) and Agency Funds. The Expendable Trust Fund is accounted for in essentially the same manner as Governmental Fund Types. Agency Funds are custodial in nature (assets equal liabilities) and do not involve measurement of results of operations. General Fixed Assets Account Group, The General Fixed Assets Account Group represents a summary of the fixed assets of the City, other than assets of the Proprietary Funds. Capital outlays in funds other than Proprietary Fund Type are recorded as expenditures of those funds at the time of purchase and I subsequently recorded for control purposes in the General fixed Assets Account Group. General Long-Term Liabilities Account GrouD The General Long-Term Liabilities Account Group represents a summary of the long-term liabilities of the City paid principally by taxes levied by the City. This account group does not include long-term debt accounted for in the Proprietary Fund Types. 8. Basis of Accounting T accrual- --The Proprietary Fund types are accounted for on a flow o economic resources measurement focus. Accordingly, the accrual basis, whereby revenues and expenses are identified in the accounting period in which they are earned and incurred and net income is determined, is utilized for these funds. Modified accrual basis--The Governmental Fund Types, Expendable Trust and Agency Funds are accounted for on a flow of financial resources measurement focus. Accordingly, the modified accrual basis is used for these funds. Modifications in the accrual basis for these funds include the following: 1. Revenues are recognized when they become both measurable and available for use during the year. Those revenues treated as being susceptible to accrual include taxes, interest and intergovernmental revenues. Revenue sources i -19- w , r rM eWS~ i Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1990 from licenses, fines and forfeitures, service charges and other miscellaneous revenues are recognized as the cash is received. 2. Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred, except for interest and principal on general long-term debt, which are recorded when due, and vacation and sick leave, which are recorded when payable from current available resources. 3. Encumbrance accounting, under which purchase orders, ~ contracts, and other commitments for the expenditure of ' monies are recorded in order to reserve that portion of the applicable appropriation, is employed as an extension of r formal budgetary integration. Encumbrances outstanding at ; G year-end are reported as reservations of fund balances since they do not constitute expenditures or liabilities, w C. Budgets and Budgetary Accounting The City Council follows these procedures as prescribed by City Charter, in establishing the budgets reflected in the financial statements: i 1. At least sixty days prior to the beginning of each fiscal year, the City Manager submits to the City Council a proposed budget for the fiscal year beginning on the following October 1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing them, 2. Public hearings are conducted prior to the adoption of the budget in order to obtain taxpayer comments. 3. The annual budget adopted by the City Council covers the , f General Fund, the Special Revenue Fund (Recreation Fund only), the Debt Service Fund, the Enterprise Funds, and the Internal Service Fund (Working Capital Fund only), The budget is legally enacted by the City Council through passage of an ordinance prior to the beginning of the fiscal year. The general purpose financial statements reflect appropriation control at fund level as approved by City Council. L 4. The City Charter provides that the City Manager has the E J j' authority to transfer any unencumbered appropriation balances from one expenditure account to another within a single office, department or agency. The Charter also provides that within the last three months of the year the City Manager must request the City Council to approve any transfer of unencumbered appropriation balances or portions thereof from one function to another as well as any increases in fund appropriations. Individual amendments were not material in relation to the original appropriations which were amended. -20- 1 M r I~ Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1990 n All budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles except that for the Governmental Fund 1 Types roprietarry Fund Types encumbrances are treated as budgeted expenditures in the year of commitment to purchase and for the Proprietary Fund Types depreciation expense is not budgeted. All unexpended appropriations at fiscal year end lapse to the appropriate fund balance except for those of the multi-year grants and/or projects. A reconciliation of revenues and expenditures on the budgetary basis to revenues and expenditures on the modified accrual basis for Governmental Fund Types is as follows: SPECIAL GENERAL REVENUE FUND FUNDS Revenues: Budgetary basis $19,985,486 Special Revenue Funds f 424,662 Unbudgeted: Community Development Block Grant - 4990542 Criminal Justice - 93,829 Emily Fowler Library 1280214 Other 805.594 Revenues on modified j accrual basis 19.985.486 11951.861 f! Expenditure;: Budgetary basis 25,540,445 5011085 Encumbrances (net) 329,428 116872 Special Revenue Funds Unbudgeted: Community Development Block Grant - 497,999 Criminal Justice - 105,965 Emily Fowler library - 1240092 Other 993,182 Expenditures on modified accrual basis 25.869.873 2.234.195 Revenues over (under) expenditures on modified accrual basis f;s"aaw) ><.O J , f 1111111111111111f i JPF w 1 ~ Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1990 0. Investments Investments are carried at cost which approximates market value except for investments in the deferred compensation plan which are carried at market value. Interest earned on investments is recorded in the funds in which the investments are recorded. E. Unbilled Receivables The City accrues amounts for utility services provided in September, but not billed at September 30. F. Inventoried Inventories are valued at cost or the lower of cost or market. j Cost is determined using a moving average method. G. Fixed Assets i Enterprise and Internal Service Funds- 3 + Fixed assets are recorded at cost, including net interest during the construction period, Contributed property is recorded at fair E market value at the date of contribution. Depreciation is recorded on each class of depreciable property utilizing the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, l i Estimated useful lives are as follows: Fixed Asset Useful Life (Years) ENTERPRISE FUNDS- Electric System General assets - Structures SO Equipment s - 20 i Distribution assets - Structures SO - Equipment 20 - 33 Transmission assets - Equipment 20 - 33 Internal combustion assets - Structures s0 - Equipment 13 - 20 Steam power assets - Structures s0 - Equipment 20 - 35 kater and Sewer System Structures s0 Water and sewer mains 20 - 33 Equipment 10 - 20 Furniture and fixtures 10 Water Storage Rights +0 - 100 SnItAtion Vehicles and equipment 10 L Landfill 9 + I INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS- Vehicles and equipment 1 - 10 L u ~ "1 e 1 ~ r g i Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1990 Renewals and betterments of property and equipment are r- capitalized, whereas normal repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. General Fixed Assets- General, peciall Revenue orsCapitale ProjectsdFunds whenndacquired ~n Stch assets are capitalized at cost in the General Fixed Assets Account Group. Significant gifts or contributions of assets are recorded in the General Fixed Assets Account Group at the fair market value at the date of acquisition. Public domain (infrastructure) general fixed assets consisting of streets, curbs, sidewalks, gutters and drainage systems, are capitalized along with other general fixed assets. No depreciation is provided on general fixed assets. H, Property Tax Revenue ' January attach as an on October enfceable are duena and payable at as time. A11 unpaid taxes levied October 1 become delinquent February 1 of the following year. The City records revenue from current property taxes in the year in which bills are measurable and available. An allowance is provided for delinquent taxes not expected to be collected in the future. At September 30, 19900 the City had a tax margin of $1,88 per $100 valuation based upon a maximum ad valorem tax of $2,50 per $100 valuation imposed by Texas Constitutional law, Additional revenues up to $40,036,776 could be raised per year based on the current year's assessed value of $2,139,001,561 before the limit is reached. 1. Compensated Absences The City allows employees to accumulate unused vacation up to forty days. Upon termination, any accumulated vacation time will be paid to the employees. Generally, sick leave is not paid upon termination except for fire and policemen. Fire and policemen accumulate unused sick P leave up to a maximum of 90 days. All other employees are paid only upon I illness while in the employ of the City. leave and As of September 30, 1990, the liability for accrued vacation applicable accrued sick the EnterpriseeFundsa ($445,513)1 and2 Internal Service Funds ($21,469) have been recorded in those funds, and. the amount applicable to other funds ($2,393,124) has been recorded in the General Long-Term Liabilities Account Group. The amount expected to be paid from current available financial resources is not significant. a i i ..J i -23- 1 A N Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1990 J. "Memorandum Only" Total Columns Total columns on the combined statements are captioned as "memorandum only" to indicate that they are presented only to facilitate analysis. Data in these columns do not present financial position, results of operations or changes in financial position in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. This presentation does not represent a consolidation. Interfund eliminations have not been made in the aggregation of this data. (2) CASH AND INVESTMENTS t In order to facilitate effective cash management practices, the operating cash and certificates of deposits of all funds, except for the deferred compensation fund are pooled into common accounts for the purpose of increasing income through combined investment activities. The C City's bank deposits (cash and certificates of deposit) at year-end were j entirely covered by federal depository insurance or by collateral held by the City's agent in the City's name. The investments of the deferred compensation fund are held 7 separately from those of other City funds by an outside trustee appointed f by the City. Statutes authorize the City to invest in obligations of the U.S. Treasury, U.S. agencies, repurchase agreements, and certificates of deposit. At September 30, 1990, the City's investments are insured or registered or the securities are held by the City or its agent in the City's name. As of September 30, 19909 the City's investments are as J_ i follows: Market P.ist 5.9~ ya l ue _ U.S. Treasury Securities $55,765,000 $55"519,231 355"8141681 U.S. Agency Securities 191350,000 19,3090205 198438,877 Money Market 1,253,325 -)-.253.32 -1+325 f 2S W69 =26,50a L i -24- C' i J 1 ~ Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1990 (3) FIXED ASSETS General Fixed Assets- summaritedst~eleW,transactions for the year ended September General fixed 1990, assets Balance Balance Transfers/ September 30, October 1, 1990 , e~ g Additions Deductions- 19 4 126,786 x - x $ 4 726,786 8,438,732 Land , Buildings 8,438,732 _ 41,345,044 I C, Streets 39,296056 8,048,288 Machinery and equipment 463,185 - 1,175,732 4 ) 4 91 and other improvements 60712,547 Construction in progress _11,.l 49 1 5 320.?94 ~ ~ $71Total S'"Z8 s33'9~1'`~'~I f~9+449+~) +l j Investment in General , Fixed Assets- 7 945. l3 from bond issues 14965340219 $13,363,582 x(8,048,288) 1,54,854,5 From current revenue 7 4 1,893 - 46 ,185 ,799,541 570016,112 13,831,767 (8,048,288) 62 62 323 16 ` • From contributions 1.~,~2~4]~. x~~~ xf6 1 gl Total $70,319, sla.RAI l ,.1 i -25- J r rr~ 1 1 I ` Notes, Cityy of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1990 General Fixed Assets by function and actlelty as of September 30, 1990 are summarized as follows: MatAnd Otherf Total Land 19y ldlnos S r e iMULa efts fS 551 63 707AL PRIOR TO OCTOBER 1, 1986 553 104 $4,594,452 $8,390,132 $34,702,204 GENERAL GOVERNMENT: 161,199 11,119 21,883 - 1N,S91 ; Parks 59,834 42,026 - - 17,80092 60, Parks Grant 60,092 - 1,351 Personnel legal 7,357 _ 9,869 Personnel Court - - - 19,325 19;325 - INIdino 7,895 _ 2,ISO - 5,145 452,1031 P1Liranniary Maintenance 455,365 - 68:924 Library 144,071 73,201 2,034 - , - Operations Analysis 4 B2 _ - 711, 16 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 9 B 126 94 31.125 _ PUBLIC WORKS: 34,248 Traffic Enptneerlnq 34,248 11,150 ; Emergencyy Management 14,150 24,259 14p10 Enforcement 24;811 - 20,133 i Publi Coat Enforcement - - l Streee t$ Works Administration 12,132:94S 20 133 4,335 11,590 12,642,760 24,091 Str - 1 Street SBetnfnq/Drainage 23,796 - 32,19 ,415 Airpppooort bond 2,615 _ E1nrylron+rntal Health Services - i,415 Animal Control --3+~ 107AL PUBLIC WORKS 4 B 4,335 11,590 212.091 I- FINANCE: 21,596 21,596 finance Administration 25,581 - - - 21,591 A - - 305 Custonrr Service 3,10 10 Puraschier{hasjnnp pp - - - courant n 10'~ 20;142 w, I Court Clerks ~ " f~ Tax 6,1 Z34 - 1,122 107,211120 Data Word Pcrocesslnng0 106,043 - 20903 TOTAL FINANCE - 4,025 4 PUBLIC SAFETY: 120122 - 12,122 F re Opar&n oi tratlon 1651g~ 1,053 1,260 103,8x1 F F~ re re Prevent on - /,11r O _ , Emergency Medial 1904 - 1 _ 110 Firf (2511 1911 0 - 431,121 " Po{{1C4e Adilinistratlon 31,129 - - ~t S ~;nefa0plo~eln+tee}} lonatlon,STI 86,029 Patlrol Olvjslon 020 - --13+¢+ Police Grant$ r rx kk TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 419,011 416.1 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS .8,434+111 Si TOTAL $Ali" 4 a~ slel3La~2 1 =LS1iel~ti a- _6_ I 6+ 1 J , i ~ v Notes, Cityy of Denton (Continued) September 30, ,990 - Changes in genera) fixed assets by function and activity for the fiscal year ended ` September 30, 1990 are summarized as follows: General General Fixed Assets Transfers/ Fixed Assets 10/01/89 Additions Deductions 09/30/90 TOTAL PRIOR TO OCTOBER I, 1986 353.211.504 = f $53,241,50 GENERAL GOVERNMENT: Parks 119,213 41,986 - 161,199 Parks Grant 48,001 11,833 59,834 Legal 41,768 18,324 60,092 Municipal court 6,962 395 1,357 Personnel 9,S99 270 - 9,869 CMO/RSEO 13,400 5,925 - 19,325 Building Maintenance 7,895 - 1,895 Library 313,568 141,791 - 455,365 Planning/CD 134,721 9,350 - 144,071 Operations Analysis 220 4.604 4.824 T TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 695,347 234.484 929.831 i PUBLIC WORKS: Traffic Engineering 33,663 585 - 34,248 Emergencyy Management 14,150 - - 14,150 r Engineerin9 25,259 - 25,259 1 Code Enforcement 1,659 3,212 - 4,811 1 Public Works Administration 11,027 3,706 - 20,733 Streets 4,611,664 8,061,281 - 12,132,945 Street Sweeping/Oralna9e 20,091 - 20,091 Airport Bond 3,796 - 3,796 Airport 1,251 1,362 - 2,613 ntUMot Health - J.~I _ 3.601 415 Anf!ni Co ont to rol TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 4,760,469 8.102.313 12.870.102 flNA Fininca Administratlon 12,902 8,691 - 21,596 Customs Serrics 221567 3,011 - 2S Purchas n9 10319 20210 - 3,589 Cashiering T01 - Jo? Accounting 6,$71 12,418 - 1809% Court Clerks 19,132 1,410 - 20,542 97 20S word Process n9 2, /,191 - 26,1 rtnnoo o9a 10,945 - 106, DefensiveDriving 931 152, 1 TOTAL FINANCE 181.874 43.213 22S. i54 PUBLIire SAFET~3 Fre AiNltttration S,/S2 6,610 - 12,122 Fre Opsratioons 107,181 51,911 - 165,1 1 F Prsventloonn 4,979 Abp S 8~9 Emer9sn Msdleai 17,~p 1,666 19;+13 Firrss (25) 1,321 6,213 7,596 1 f" PCI AdminIsteatIon 11,681 5,029 _ 19,110 t Cr ~A W Investigation 10,501 21,221 - 31,721 Palace 0or ations 57;578 57 Patrtool on 6A; 122 P011es Granst Orants 18 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 217.621 131.391 Ii9,011 CONSTRUCTION IN PROWESS 114164.407 5.320.241 Jl py,~l •u! 6.911 TOTAL slOeiisaM ;J3eMAW =L1e01~eifL) ~36elZlair~ .27- J 1 } s Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1990 Construction in progress Is carrposed of the following; Project Expended to ApLroprlatl0A September 30, 1990 Committed Airport Improvements f 3331000 j 18,765 s 314,235 Northeast Recreation Center 1,300,000 4,000 1,296,000 Radio BMeg 1,100,000 1,096,312 3,688 E` Athletic fields 850 000 136,332 113,660 Libra 42S,000 39,009 385,991 I Equipment 200,000 193,461 6,539 Fire Station 500,000 _ $00,000 + Law Enforcement 200,000 4,860 195,140 i GIS Computer System 1,150,000 354,743 79S,257 i Fire Station e5 533,000 543,702 (10782) k G: i Street and Arldgg - j Carroll Blvd. Project 240,000 235,45t 4,549 t Highway 380 Projects 109,000 43,689 65,311 Miller Projects 585,000 463,841 )21,)Sq r Repave Projects 1,340,466 1,338,107 2,359 Teasley Projects 1,165,381 1,061,399 103,988 Evers Park I Fry 10,000 360526 3,171 Hrcules 129,199 68,923 60,276 f Hickory 15,000 S1390 9,610 r645,021 614,430 30,591 Locust 11155,313 551,466 597,841 Stuart I)I,SS3 145,290 32,255 West oak 10131,611 741,601 Wlndsor 390,010 ' 50,000 42$45 10/SS Eta 314,516 10439 301 071 Scripture 347,907 20,724 321,103 Boil Avenue 450,000 88,657 3614343 Mingo Road 250,000 13,211 236,109 Signal Synchronization 18'299 10172 Willow Spring 3370000 321366 301,634 Drain study 425,000 2170155 131,145 Traffic SystemVSgwre 125,000 124,436 564 Sidewalks 125,000 12,400 112,520 Janes Street 900000 94 gq,906 r Longrldge Street 3000000 1,563 291,431 Stuart/Sunny 350,000 91 349,906 Lou Del Rey 625,000 160102 6011291 Nottingham 500,000 1 342 495,651 Fort Worth Drive 1,065.000 /.593 1,060.401 _I 2e Cdr . . , . u r t ~ Motes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1990 Enterprise and Internal Service Funds- Fixed assets of these funds are as follows; Se Comber 30 1990 I_ 984 _ Utlllty System- Land and land rights f 1,199,531 f 1,796,531 Water storage rights 55,340,064 53,359,931 Electric plant and equlprnt 11,100,170 69,146,203 water plant and equipnxnt 38,581,503 31,333,659 Sewer plant and equlpment 38_ ,492.581 73 ,512.916 i Less- A1lowanca for depreciation 20S,3 13,658 199,119,31; Ma-73,193) MA UM? 1 138,938,465 139,093,236 COnstructlon in progress -aMM 1.016.153 Total fixed assets - utility system $A 8 = Sanitation- Land and land rights f 1,981,112 f 109840112 Vehicles and squipwnt 10!,599 394,132 Less- Allowance for depreciation _Il.032.t16) 1196,12311 Total fixed assets - Sanitation = t-+ _ Internal service- yehicln and other assets 1 12,611,633 Loss- Allowance for depreciation f 11,961,619 9,1#8.1451 _14.016.OS1) f 2,894,110 1 2,945,628 Construction In progress Total fixed assets - Internal Service f 1 .2g. 1 w~ 1 _ Y Notes, City of Oenton (Continued) September 30, 1990 (4) LONG-TERM LIABILITIES Long-term liabilities transactions for the year ended September 30, 1990, are summarized as follows: BALANCE AT BALANCE AT OCTOBER 1, SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 ISSUED E R 1990 General Lona-Term Liabilities r General Obligation bonds 1, 21,655,309 3 7;1,986,800 Certificates of Obligation 1,830,000 10501000 145,000 $ 22,835,000 Obligations under capital r leases 7,279 610575 8,091 Compensated absences 2_ 21y 6 ?32 176.892 _ 60,763 2.393.124 Total general long-term liabilities 3 708 1 g _.3 8.467 4 B 3 9 39 Proorietarv Fune T~~~ j Utility System rc bonds 41,040,000 200000,000 2,430,000 General Obligation bonds 58,610,000 (pledged by sanitation revenues) 1,301,421 123,200 1,178,221 Contractual Obligation 530 000 260,000 Certificates of Obligation 755,000 10650,000 245,000 160,000 Obligations under capital 201260,0000 leases 92087 35,818 93,641 !5,218 Compensated absences Note payable 457,776 99266 C 467,042 -1+9$3.]?1 1.43_ 3.812 53.6 58 Total proprietary fund types 97--- 2$ 23.678.271 4.58_5.659_ 116.979.664 C Total long-term liabilities =1 9-G9 .97) 32A =6.7o =~s a s -30- L_ rr 14. Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1990 i General Bonded Debt- General bonded debt at September 30, 1990, is comprised of the AMOUNT following. ORIGINAL OUTSTANDING AT ISSUE FINAL AMOUNT SEPTEMBER 301 INTEREST BONDED RATE DATE MATURITY OF_ ISSUE 1 -99 'O~- DEBT 831,730 fr General obligation 5.10 to 8.30 1985 2004 523,126,730 $16, 3,500,000 2,975,000 1 3,425,000 II Refunding 1987 2001 2008 3,600,000 General obligation 6.40 to 9.40 3 6_ i__5 ~ 3.61S.000 C4 General Obligation 6.50 to 9.50 1988 General obligation 6.50 to 9.50 1989 2009 34 441.130 2626 88 6 130 Total General Obligation Bonds 500,000 425,000 2007 B60,000 Cert. of Obligation 6.00 to 9.00 1987 1997 1,100,000 270,000 Cert. of Obligation 6.00 to 8.15 1988 1991 115,000 910,000 Cont. Obligation 5.38 to 6.30 1999 1,155,000 550,000 11 Cert . of Obligation 6.60 to 9.60 1989 1499 1,550,000 1, r 1989 1993 QO 1 O-DDO rt. of Obligation 6.00 to 9.00 1990 l Ce 6.70 ion 6.30 to Cert. of 4bli9at 6~ 33 0 _5_L2 65.0Q0 y Total Other General Bonded Debt 340.7 S~ 111. 3O 111 Total General Bonded Debt proceeds of general bonded debt are restricted The City Charter expressly which they were approved in the bond elections. i obl of The general prohibits the use of bond pi proceeds theufullpfaitfi and Dcredit igationsare colletea and, Drimarily, payable from Property taxes. In 19851 the city defeased all general obligation rovide for trust to , placing the proceeds of new donithenold rbondsblepccordinglY, the trust all future debt service payments 1990, 317,745,000 of s and nanclaliastatements. One ,Sedefeased ptember 30 ds are not included In account assefi the City ,s bonds considered defeased are still outstanding. ' -31- r a Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1940 Revenue Bonds- Revenue bond debt at September 30, 1990, is comprised of the following issues: AMOUNT ORIGINAL OUTSTANDING AT REVENUE INTEREST ISSUE • FINAL AMOUNT SEPTEMBER 30, 1J BONDS RATE DATE MATURITY OF ISSUE 1940 Utility System 4.75 to 9.625 1983 2007 $25,280,000 $13,050,000 Utility System 9.00 to 12.00 1984 2009 20,000.000 4,500,000 Utility System 8.00 to 11.00 1984 2004 1000,000 250,000 ; Utility System 5.00 to 7.00 1987 2004 17,485,000 17,485,000 Refunding Utility System 6.75 to 9.75 1988 2007 3,500,000 3,325,000 ; Utility System 6.00 to 4.00 1989 2009 20,000,000 20,000,000 ! I $B7~, ; 6 $58,.610.000 f The City has the option to retire at par all or a portion of the bonds, except for the Utility System Revenue Bonds issued October 25, 1984, prior to maturity on or after December 1, 1993. The bonds issued October 25, 1484, give the City the same option on or after December 1, C 1994. 1 The revenue bonds are collateralized by the revenue of the Utility System and the various special funds established by the bond ordinance. The ordinance provides that the revenue of the System is to be r used first to pay operating and maintenance expenses of the System and second to establish and maintain the revenue bond funds. Any remaining revenues may then be used for any lawful purpose. The ordinance also contains provisions which, among other items, restrict the issuance of additional revenue bonds unless the special funds noted above contain the required amounts and certain financial ratios are met. The City is in compliance with all significant requirements. Below is a summary of the L various restricted asset accounts required by the bond ordinance as of September 30, 1990: f" Interest and Sinkin Fund L i Reserve Fund 9 $ 7,003,202 Emergency Fund 4,945,000 250,000 Extension and Improvement Fund 2,584,469 Assets in these accounts consists of cash and U.S. government M securities. Related liabilities and retained earnings are as follows: Payable from restricted assets- - Accrued interest $ 105540977 Revenue bonds payable, current 209000000 Retained earnings reserved for bond retirement 10,322,643 - -32- w , . F1KlY~ i r;~ r r Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1990 In prior years, the City defeased revenue bonds by placing the proceeds of new bonds in an irrevocable trust to provide for all future - debt service payments on the old bonds. Accordingly, the trust account assets and liabilities for the defeased bonds are not included in the City's financial statements. On September 30, 1990, $36,405,000 of bonds considered defeased are still outstanding. estab General Obligatfonibondstpledged bysSanit tlioneevenueseofe$1f19 075 pay for Note payable- I Corp of n 1980 the City and the City of Dallas contracted with the Reservoir EiniDentonfCounty construction and withd the development n of of Ray City will pay for twenty-six (26%) per cent of the estimated water ' storage rights of the reservoir. Water obtained from the Reservoir will be pro rata on the basis of each city's proportional share of total construction cost. The closing of the dam was completed in 1987 with water being available from the Reservoir in 1989. The City's estimated total cost of water storage rights $55,3400000. Of this amount the City's estimated cost for p,resentOdemand is $28,646,800. The amount allocated to the storage for present demand shall be paid in fifty (50) consecutive annual installments, the first of which was due and payable within thirty (30) days after the City was notified by the contracting officer that the project was completed and operational for water supply purposes. Annual installments are due and payable in October. t The project investment cost allocated for the remaining portion ' of the storage space provided in Ray Roberts Reservoir for future use is j currently estimated at $26,443,200 on the basis of cost presented, and the basis of cost at September 30, 1990. No principal or interest payment with respect to this storage for future water supply is required to be made during the first ten (10) years following the date the project i is operational for water supply purposes unless all or a portion of such If storage is used for purposes of withdrawal of water from or transfer of water into Ray Roberts Reservoir during this period. When any portion of the storage for future water supply is used, the amount of the project investment cost allocated thereto, plus interest applicable to such 3 of such portiondtdTheisaideamdue ountndueashalli be t paid date within the life use the project and not to exceed fifty (50) consecutive annual payments. The City is also responsible for twenty-six (26%) per cent of the cost of any major capital replacement facilities required. The City will also be required to pay the government twenty-six (26%) per cent of the annual experienced operation and maintenance costs for specific water supply facilities at the Reservoir. -33- sws~ ~ •r r Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1990 Aggregate maturities of the long-term debt (principal and interest) for the years subsequent to September 30, 1990, are as follows: 1 _ BONDS FISCAL GENERAL NOTES CAPITAL YEAR OBLIGATIONS REVENUE PAYABLE LEASES TOTAL 1991 S 6,256,675 $ 7,445,856 = 2,034,235 $ 24,584 $ 15,761,350 1992 6,016,305 7,155,138 20034,235 24,584 15,830,262 1993 5,807,975 7,459,087 2,034,235 240584 15,325,881 1994 5,332,136 7,100,213 2,034,235 24,584 14,4910168 1995 5,334,065 6,747,819 2,034,235 20,972 14,137,091 1996-2000 20,215,603 28,328,532 12,005,991 - 60,5500126 2001-2005 7,645,148 19,823,708 19,345,210 - 460814,066 2006-2010 3,000,000 14,200,858 19,345,210 - 36,546,068 2017-2015 - - 19,345,210 - 19,34S,210 2016-2046 109.170.868 - 109.170.868 Total principal and interest 59,607,907 98,861,211 189,383,664 119,308 347,972,090 Less applicable _ interest 127.496,177) (40,251.211) (135.724.476) 23 327) (203.495.191) Total principal = 32.111.730 $ 58.6® 1® $.Za5gA18e8 $JIM f 144 47~ W t' Bonds Authorized and Unissued- General obligations bonds authorized but unissued as of September 30, 1990, amuunted to $100922,000. When issued, the proceeds will be allocated to the applicable Capital Projects Funds., (5) LEASES Leases payable represent the remaining principal amounts payable under lease purchase agreements for the acquisition of vehicles, copier equipment, computer hardware and other equipment. These leases are recorded as capital leases. The vehicles, copier equipment and the landfill vehicles are recorded in the Proprietary Fund Types, and the computer hardware and other equipment are recorded in the General Fixed Assets and General Long-Term Liabilities Account Groups. Remaining requirements, including interest, under these leases are as follows: J i' i -34- i J 1 y I ~ , ~ crxsn~ Notes, city of Denton (Continued) September 30. 1990 General Proprietary Long-Term ies Fungi eS Liabilities year $ 15,295 s 9,289 15,295 1991 9,289 15,295 1992 9,289 15,295 1993 9,289 12,746 1994 8.226 1995 13,926 45,382 1jj 63) 1(0) Less- Interest portion s ,a• is Net Present value (6) PENSION PLANS Texas Nunici al Retirement P1an: Plan Description- The city provides pension benefhts a for all joint except firefighters) throug employees (except contribution plan in the state-wide TexaS,Naniagent contributory, one of over 550 administered by 1 Retirement System (TNRS), defined multiple-employer public employee retirement system. st is the deft opinion voluntary ubs addit to provide arerovide s ional of the TNRS management that they the have plans in disclosure to help oFntsome of the contribution P foster a better understanding + nontraditional characteristics of the plan. the employee's y re btst edits Benefits depend upon the sum of with financed monetary credits, the plan, with interest, and the citythe city granted monetary interest. At the date the plan began, the employee, with byfetical cmodits equal for service ren~hatd uouldrehave been abutedtheo to two times tan. konetary percent of the employee's interest, prior to establishment of the plan. service since the plan began are a (20an grant as often as accumulated contributions. in addition, the city annually another type of monetary credit referred whe ns added updated e service credit which is a theoretical amount which, employee's accumulated wcontr ouldi beions tand otalhmon tarYycreditssandrempyesince the plan began the ' contributions accumulated with interest if the current employee had always been in existence his salary in contribution rate and city matching percent if the and if the employee's salary had always been the averag Iculated as reme the benefit s ca the last tr emoytee's Aaccumuilated tcontributions iwith interest and the sum of the P employer-financed monetary credits with interest were used to purchase an annuity. -35- J J - 1 p a+,el i Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1990 a of servlceMorbat agcan reire at es 50-59 witha25sor0moand above re years oft service orrwith 2 years disabilitysbenefits, A lmembeess is9e vesed aftlan also er ten provides death and leave his accumulated contributions in the plan. If a amemberu withdraws yrs, he must his own money, he is not entitled to the employer-financed monetary credits, even if he was vested. The plan provisions are adopted by the governing body of the city, within the options available in the state statutes governing TMRS and within the actuarial constraints also in the _ statutes. Contributions- F The contribution rate for the employees is 5%, and the city matching percent is currently 200%, both as adopted by the governing body of the city. Under the state law governing TMRS, the city contribution rate is annually determined by the actuary. Part of the contribution rate (the normal cost) is to fund the currently accruing ` monetary credits, with the other part (the prior service contribution rate) calculated as the level percent of payroll needed to amortize the unfunded actuarial liability over the remainder of the plan's 25-year amortization period. When the city periodically adopts updated service credits and increases in annuities in effect, the increased unfunded actuarial liability is to be amortized over a new 25-year period. Currently, the unfunded actuarial liability is being amortized over the 25-year period which began January, 1990. The unit credit actuarial cost method is used for determining the city contribution rate. Contributions are made monthly by both the employees and the city. Since the city needs to know its contribution rate in advance to budget for it, there is r a one-year lag between the actuarial valuation that is the basis for the rate and the calendar year when the rate goes into effect. The and the city'sicontributions weroll In based sonl a year pa 1940 was $23,150,602 Both the city and the covered employees made the required contributions amounting to $1,020,272 (5,469 of covered calendar year 1989 and 5.24% for the months payroll calendar the months in the city and $9460850 (5%) for the employees. The city adopted changes in the plan since the previous actuarial valuation! which hadrthegeffect of increasing the city's contribution rate for 1990 by 0.3% of payroll. There were no related-party transactions. Funding Status and Progress- Even though the substance of the city's plan is not to provide [t a defined benefit in some form, some additional voluntary disclosure is appropriate due to the nontraditional nature of the defined contribution plan which had an initial unfunded pension benefit obligation due to the monetary credits granted by the city for services rendered before the plan began and which can have additions to the unfunded pension benefit obligation through the periodic adoption of increases in benefit credits and benefits. Statement No, 5 of the Governmental Accounting Standards -36- 1 i 1 1~ r Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1990 1 I S) Boar ( disclosures measuref ofeStheeactuarial nepresent l value nofapension standardized ` adjusted for the effects of projected salary increases, estimated to be payable in the future as a result of employee service to date. The measure is intended to help users assess the funding status of public employee pension plans, assess progress made in accumulating sufficient assets to pay benefits when due, and make comparisons among public employee pension plans. The pension benefit obligation shown below is similar in nature to the standardized disclosure measure required by GAS8 5 for defined benefit plans except that there is no need to project salary increases since the benefit credits earned for service to date are not dependent upon future salaries. The calculations were made as part of the annual actuarial valuation as of December 31, 1989. Because of the money- purchase nature of the plan, the interest rate assumption, currently 8.5% per year, does not have as much impact on the results as it does for a defined benefit plan. Market value of assets is not determined for each ; city's plan, but the market value of assets for TMRS as a whole was 108.7% of book value as of December 31, 1989. Pension Benefit Obligation Annuitants currently receiving benefits S 11688,095 121,602 ? Terminated employees Current employees Accumulated employee contributions including 7,347,382 allocated invested earnings 7,466,936 Employer-financed vested r' D29-5. 303 Employer-financed nonvested TOTAL 619,3190318 ~ I ~ Net Assets Available for Benefits at Book Value 16,633,114 Unfunded Pension Benefit Obligate 6 6 The book value of assets is amortized cost for bonds and original cost for short-term securities and stocks. The actuarial assumptions used to compute the actuarially determined city contribution rate are the same as those used to compute the pension benefit obligation. The numbers above reflect the adoption of changes in the by 6141137 had the effect of pension previous benefit obligation valuation, plan sinc,e increasing the the _ I I I -37- 1 e Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1990 ' Trend information - i Three Year Historical Trend Information December 31, December 31, December 31, Year Ended 1987 1988 _ 1989 Net Assets Available for Benefits $11,6430689 $14,146,080 $16,633,114 j Pension Benefit Obligation $13,665,302 $16,639,047 $19,319,318 Percentage Funded 85.2% 85.0% 86.1% Unfunded Pension Benefit Obligation $ 2,021,613 $ 2,4920967 $ 2,686,204 r Annual Covered Payroll $16,535,036 $18,148,919 $18,947,816 Gi Pension Benefit Obligation as a i Percentage of Covered Payroll 12.2% 13.7% 14.2% Trend information prior to 1987 is not available. Ten year trend information will not be shown separately until five years of data have been accumulated. Fireman's Relief and Retirement Plan: The City provides pension benefits for all Civil Service employees of the Fire Department through a defined contribution plan. The Board of Trustees of the Denton Fireman's Relief and Retirement Fund r is the administrator for the pension plan. The Pension plan is not considered a part of the city of Denton entity. In a defined contribution plan, benefits depend solely on amounts contributed to the plan plus investment earnings. Fire employees are required to become a member as a condition of employment. An employee becomes fully vested after 20 years of credited service. City contributions for, and interest L. ` forfeited by, employees who leave employment before vesting are redistributed to plan participants. The City's total Fire Department portion of payroll in fiscal year 1990 was $3,333,849. Both the City and the covered employees made the required contribution (8.0% for 1989 and 8.5% for 1990), amounting to $261,022 from each source or $522,044 in total. i ~ i' I -38- s a e I! Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1990 (7) DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN The City offers its employees a deferred compensation plan created in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 457. The plan, available to all permanent City employees, permits them to defer, until future years, up to 25% of annual gross earnings not to exceed $7,500. The deferred compensation is not available to employees until termination, retirement, death, or unforeseeable emergency. All amounts of compensation deferred under the plan, all property and rights purchased with those amounts, and all income attributable to those amounts, property, or rights are (until paid or G made available to the employee or other beneficiary) solely the property and rights of the city (without being restricted to the provisions of benefits under the plan), subject only to the claims of the City's general creditors. Participants' rights under the plan are equal to those of general creditors of the City in an amount equal to the fair market value of the deferred account for each participant. Investments (primarily cash and cash equivalents) in the deferred compensation plan are recorded at market value. It is the opinion of the City's legal counsel that the City has no liability for losses under the plan but does have the duty of due care that would be required of an ordinary prudent investor. The management of the City believes that it is unlikely that it will use the assets to r satisfy the claims of general creditors at this time. (8) SELF-INSURANCE PLAN The City has established a self-insurance plan for workers' 1 compensation benefits and general liability. Claims exceeding a limit for any one accident or occurrence are covered through an insurance carrier. Accrued claims payable include provisions for claims reported and claims incurred but not reported. The provisions for reported claims is determined by estimating the amount which will ultimately be paid each claimant. The provision for claims incurred but not yet reported is estimated based on the City's experience. The costs associated with the self-insurance plan are reported as interfund transactions. Accordingly, they are treated as operating revenues of the Expendable Trust Fund and operating expenditures (expenses) of the other funds. 3 ~a -39- r ~ Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1990 (9) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES 'p Agreement with TMPA- . In 1976, the City, along with the cities of Bryan, Gllde and Garland, Texas (the Cities) entered into a Power Sales • TMPA wasreencreavite through concurrent Contract with heuordinan:esoofrtheeCities(and)is governed by a Board i of Directors consisting of eight members, two appointed by the _ or city. agreed to bconstructeach acquire Under electrlc terms of the agreement, TMPA generating plants to supply energy and power to the Cities for a period of not less than 35 years. { The Cities in turn agreed to purchase all future requirements in excess of the amounts generated by theirrsystemsnfrom TMPA at prices intended to cover operating costs and retirement of debt. In the event that revenues are insufficient to cover all costs , C.,J and retire the outstanding debt, each of the Cities has guaranteed a t~ portion of the unpaid debt based, generally, upon its pro rata share of the energy delivered to consumers in the prior operating year. As of September 30, 1989, total TMPA debt outstanding was approximately 11 470,000,000, and the City's approximately 22x. In the opinion of man gementuarantes , theepossibility9ofia material payment under this guarantee is remote in that TMPA is generating operating profits and assets exceed liabilities. TMPA te- plant should TMPA abes dissolved, meacha Cityliwould bee entitlede to Ian undivided interest in the property, r Selected financial statement information of TMPA is as follows: _ September 30 (Unaudited) 1990 -ice (000's) (O00's) OPERATING REVENUES S 169,597 ~ OPERATING EXPENSES f 176,359 109,114 104,111 OPERATING INCOME 60,483 OTHER NONOPERATING SOURCES (USES) 72,242 (62,349) (53,195; I CURRENT ASSETS 68,404 85,098 1 TOTAL ASSETS 1,541,426 1,615,112 LONG-TERM DEBT 1,457,679 1,491,102 TOTAL LIABILITIES 1,512,638 1,583,539 TOTAL EQUITY !j 28,788 31,573 t -40- i r `~!t r Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1990 ` flow Memorial Hospital- The City of Denton transferred its right, title and interest, if any, in and to Flow Memorial Hospital to the Flow Regional Medical Center, Inc., non-profit corporation, in 1988. The Medical Center filed bankruptcy In 1988 and has been discharged. The County of Denton has filed a declaratory judgment action against the City requesting the Court to hold the City responsible for indigent health care costs incurred by the County pursuant to the Indigent Health Care Act, which became law in October, 1986. The Legislature repealed the law in September, 1989. Although, the City may be liable for a portion of these costs, the effect would not be material on the City's financial position at September 30, 1990. Agreement with City of Dallas- During 1985, the City entered into an agreement with the City of Dallas which provides for the purchase of a minimum of 500,000 j gallons/day of untreated water from the City of Dallas from lake Lewisville. This contract will be effective for 30 years. I Litigation- various claims and lawsuits are pending against the City. In s the opinion of City management and legal counsel, the potential losses, after insurance coverage, on all claims will not have a material effect x on the City's financial position as of September 30, 1990. x I I 1 i I J 1 -41- _ 1 t r 2,,-r rrarro~ R F Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1990 (10) SEGMENT INFORMATION FOR ENTERPRISE FUNDS Segment information for the year ended September 30, 1990, was follows: as Utility Sanitation Svstem Fund Tatal_ f 78,124,599 53,412,951 $ 81,537,550 OPERATING REVENUES r DEPRECTA.TlON 6,2890117 236,693 6,525,810 i y OPERATING INCOME 15,2660322 328,359 15,594,681, OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 6,3080435 394,731 60103,172 7,186,931 (194,909) 61992,022 NET INCOME CURRENT CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS: 340,953 - 340,953 In aid of construction ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE: _ 10,2370164 Accounts receivable, gross 10,2370164 _ 5,281,423 Allowance for uncollectibles 5,281,423 _ 4,955,741 Accounts receivable, net 4,955,741 PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT 8,164,986 7,467 8,112,453 ADDITIONS TOTAL ASSETS 219,310,705 2,159,191 221,469,896 NET WORKING CAPITAL (DEFICIT) 48,683,843 (321,777) 48,362,066 BONDS PAYABLE 58,610,000 1,178,221 59,798,221 53,659086 - 53,659,188 3 NOTES PAYABLE p TOTAL EQUITY (DEFICIT) 93,003,258 (404,518) 92,598,740 F ~1 r -42- 1 r T -----qv - -VFW ses. . Motes. City of Denton (continued) `September 30, 1990 (11) INDIVIDUAL FUND DISCLOSURES P' Individual fund disclosures as of and for the year ended i September 30, 1990, are as follows: F0 Interfund Receivables and Payables: Deficit Fund Balances/ Retained Interfund Interfund Earnings Fund Receivables Payables if an General Fund $ 474,254 $ 342,200 S - Special Revenue Funds: Community Development 55,200 Block Grant Re 870 (12,008) Recreation - Criminal Justice 24,500 (3,642) - s Emily Fowler Library - 70550 - Other 335,000 - " Debt Service - Capital Project Funds: Airport Improvement $65,000 _ Street improvements - General Projects - - _ Bond Program 565,000 2,840 Other Capital Projects - Enterprise Funds: Utility System 8,757,433 8,161,861 - Sanitation 500,000 715,497 (404,518) internal Service Funds: 1,360,b63 - Working Capital - _ k Motor Pool - Trust and Agency Funds: Expendable Trust _ Agency - Payroll 664,500 - Total f11 9fi_1A1 '(I Interfund Advances: ` bl For fiscal year 1989-90, the Sanitation operations experienced a loss of $194,909, increasing the accumulated deficit to $4040518 at September 30, 1990. The incurred losses caused a working capital shortage within the k, Sanitation Fund. To eliminate the need for commercial borrowing, a in the Sanitatio FundUtility Fund to be reppaaid 000 as interest funds bec bearing available advance f -43- r- i ti r4 i x i I i r^ r 1 i i r , r~ r. C C -44- --1 s i CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS FOR THE FISCAL YEA ENDED S PTEMBER 30. 1990 SUMMARY OF SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS ons of Communit Develo ment Block Gr n o9 - to account for the Operations revenues projects uti z ng Commun ty Development Block Grant Funds. are restricted to expenditures for specified projects by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Recreation - to account for the revenues and expenditures for the be creation d programs which are self-supporting. All eexpenditures will 100%. Various business operations, such as concessions, fall into this , ra account. Criminal Justice - to account for revenue received from the State of Texas Criminal Justice Division. t gmiiv_ Fowler ibrarV - to account for fines, donations, memorials and gifts to the Library that are restricted to the Public Library. lA l - to account for miscellaneous special revenue sources which j are required to finance specific activities. I f , I r, K 1 { r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET - ALL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS FOR THE FISO - YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Camunlty Development Criminal i ASSETS Block Grant Recreation Justic - f - Cash and deposits S 93 = 3,007 `r Receivables (net of allowance for uncollettibles): / Accrued Interest - " 11,163 J Other Due from other funds - i Due from other goverfinents 64 T2 21.310 L.; Total Assets ULM LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE r- i Liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued expenses 4 331 { 14,145 { 3,512 Due to other f..nds S5,200 810 24,500 Deferred revenues 11,33S Total liabilities b6.866 15.015 2 O1 i.. Fund Balance (Deficits): Reserved for encumbrances 105,433 20,081 I{ ! Unreserved (96.319) MM) i Total Fund Balance (Oefieits) 9.111 12, ON) Total Liabilities and Fund Balance f~~m 4~y0pt S~ C i I j ~e 1 P I r h - Fmity Totals Fowler All Library Other Seotefter 30. 1990 Seotefter 30, 1989 - 8 $521,549 $ 524,651 = 812,037 i 643 438 11,601 31,286 335,000 335,000 17,077 32.803 62L 184,648 140.120 I 632.811 sut" $61.007.763 s 6,255 $ 20,868 $ 45,111 $ 121,342 7,S50 68,120 85,998 26 11,361 15,269 j 13.831 20,068 144,592 222.60 ~ 12,612 19,635 157,761 41,659 a 6,368 079,MS 753.55 7__.4J.495 IB 9 890,070 911.31 785,154 su" 6939.,N s1rG'um SLWLJU E 1 ~i ..f -47- F I 1 P 4 ~,r r aS 1 CITY OF DENTON TEXAS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - ALL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS FOR TkE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 39 1990 cpmwnity j Development criminal 1 Recreation Justice Block Crant Revenues: 5 93,829 tntergoverimental =480,541 5411,152 - Fees for services _ S04 Interest revenue 18.995 G Miscellaneous 199,512 424 8 93 829 Total Revenues r Expenditures: Current- 141,999 i General g0vernnent 1050965 Public safety _ gB6,142 ' Parks and recreation -&-6 1 - capital outlay 491,999 g12.95T 105 ' Total Expenditures 3 Excess of Revenues Over 1,543 8 2 ) 112.136! (Under) Expenditures other financing Sources (Uses): 8,494 _ - t operating Transfers to operating Transfers Out f Total other financing e•4~ Sources (Uses) Excess of Revenues and other Sources over (Under) 1,543 (88,215) (3,642) Expenditures and Other Uses 16.26} - - Ij~ 1,511 Fund Balances - October 1 S.~.ll1 SLIie~OL) S.Lieili) Fund Balances (Deficits) - September 30 r- -48- t t 1 ~ l Total S Emlly Year Ended Fowler Libra 411 Other Se "fr 30. 1990 Witter 30. 1989 3 70,595 f 3801162 $1,025,133 $1,209,613 66,979 484,131 477,167 4,771 4,180 9,?SS 18,593 52.848 353.313 431.642 617.140 ' 126.214 805,594 1.951.861 2,392,513 64,811 925,414 1,468,290 1,769,236 _ _ 105,965 11,239 486,142 414,062 ~,9 215 67,708 153,796 61 7 2 124 993 19 2.234.195 2.2%. 1 12 141 ! 2A 3 4) 126.217 400,W0 408,494 38S, ! 400.000 -40#'-9 346,115 1 4,122 212,412 126,160 473.022 I , 14 606.4 15 312,132 f 9h f"lag-lu -49- ,i L G;~ i + I y f r n• i M e . 1 ~ r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENOED SEPTEMBER 30. 1990 SUMMARY OF CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Airport Improvement Grant Fund - to account for FAA Grant in aid for runway extension and airport development. General Protects Fund - to account for investing nonrecurring funds in capital G' plant expanse n or improvements, extraordinary maintenance projects, facility construction or other large nonrecurring projects, funded by operating revenues. Street Improvement Fund - to account for repairs and rehabilitation of city streets funded by grants and bond proceeds. Williams Square Fun - to account for paving downtown parking lot to provide - parking of in central business district funded by bond proceeds. Construction Protects Fund - to account for major rehabilitation and construc- tion of facilities funded by bond funds. Other - to account for miscellaneous capital revenues and expenditures. .J ✓9 M 1 i .d -51- r 5 1 ~ ~ liTMti~ 4 r r ~ CITY OF DENTON, TE"S COMBINING BALANCE SHEET - ALL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30 1990 Airport - 1 Improvement General Street 11illiams ASSEfS Grant Pro a is 1 rov nt Square 1153,995 $165,210 { 3,709 $12,623 cash and Ceposits - 766,005 4,703,541 - Investments Receivables 'net of allowance for uncoM!ctiblesf: _ 9,975 121,595 - Accrued interest _ _ - 111 Due from o'.her funds 21 305 Due from other goverreents $ + Total Assets } 11~ LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Liabilities: $ 22,780 $ 115,495 $ - Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ : Rainage payable 79,125 _ 565,000 i Oue to other funds 33 _ 9 3S I Deferred revenues Total Liabilities 113 000 22.1A0 7 96 i Fund Balances: 12,910 484,379 1,227,000 - Reserved for encumarances 414 ~1 9 12 6 Reserved for capital proSects ~i790 90 898,410 ~Q2A 9 X3.43 Total Fund Balances Total Liabilities and $ $e?..::9~ $ $AaiZ1 rFund Balances t l s a j { . l 1 , f a 1 1 i Construction Lta11 Projects Other Seotender 30. 1990 Seotwber 30. 1989 = 361,146 1 3,658 3 600,341 f 2,670,061 4,668,158 - 10,111,154 11,809,171 94,183 - 225,153 302,211 565,000 - 565,000 - - 7.031 28.342 21.055 :5.4 AJU Um X11.531.190 $ai i 1 f 229,033 s 4,197 $ 402,495 S 516,695 11,845 - 150,974 301,160 2,840 561,840 5,750 t 42.351 42.351 300.818 1.031 1.163.660 871,956 108,061 1,831,956 20368,182 5,219,S4 ^ _3.658 8.541.514 1.11561.832 '7 L307,604 3.658 10.313.530 13.936.614 - ss.b9alu s~u.a~s sus 1 I -53- r I r ~ CITY OF OENTON~ TEXAS COMBINING STATEMENI OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - ALL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL TEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30 1990 Airport W4114ams ,f Improvement General Street f Grant Pro -0 is Imorov_ement square. i. i Revenues: =16,889 S - S _ S - IntergovernmentAl 79,964 433,705 1D6 1 Interest revenue _ 4.192 miscellaneous - r 106 437.891 _ Total Revenues 16.889 79 Expenditures: 364.416 2.123.760 40•~ capital outlay 18.765 Total Expenditures 1.8.765 364.416 2.723.160 40.000 r Excess of Revenues Over (Under) (1.816) 281 45) jLZ8S,@,63) 39 41 Expenditures Other Financing Sources (uses): - 1,150,000 Proceeds of long-term debt operating transfers in operating transfers out ! Total Other financing 1,150 000 1 Sources (Uses) - I EXCOSS Of Revenues and Other Sources Over (Under) 865,50 (20265,963) (39,294) Expenditures and Other Uses (1,876) 3 6 l4 T S1 Fund Balances -October 1 44•116 Fund Balances - SepterrEer 30 Sam f~ s~'~ r J! Li 1 I f 's I! 1 e ~ i 61 i ~i I1 r Totals Year Ended - Construction Protects other $eotmber 30, 1990 SentenDer 30, 1989 ~k f - 1i 1,267 = 16,116 f 33,665 244,e31 - 759,206 1,191,487 6,370 2,069 12,631 104,211 251,201 3,356 190,013 1,409,363 32, 40.596 15,660 5,503,097 5112019% I 6 2.340396 1S1560 5,503,091 5,720.99 {2.089.395) 11 2.204) (4, 113.08•) (4,311,633) , 164500000 4,015,000 " ~ ~ _ _ _ 12,300 ~ (75,951} I 1,150,000 3.9e1.34~ I C (2,089,395) 112,20/) (3,563,081) (330,297) 1,417.00 4 MOO 13,936,614 14 si.39ibQ3 s.~i6 1]0.3I3.idG +~,g36.614 ~ , f ~ I -Si- 1 ' I S .h V f cri I i IFw ~ ~ 1; 1^ E D ~ M l III! I 1 ~ 1Yw 1 I l w l li r Ii n CITY OF OENTON. TEXAS j FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30. 1990 SUMMARY OF ENTERPRISE FUNDS Utility System - To account for the provision of utility services to the residents of the City. All activities necessary to provide such services are accounted for in this Fund, including, but not limited to, adminis- tration, operations, maintenance, financing and related debt service. S ni tin - To account for the provision of sanitation services to the res dents of the City. All activities necessary to provide such services are accounted for in this Fund, including, but not limited to, adminis- tration, operations, maintenance, financing and related debt service. i I I .y rJ -91- M t CITY OF OENTON. TEXAS f COMBINING BALANCE SNEET - ALL ENTERPRISE FUNDS SEPTEMBER 30 1990 i ASSETS Utility Cash and deposits Investments f 161,605 Receivables (net Of allOwances for uncollectibles)- 39,190,120 z Accounts Unbilled utility service 4,95S,141 Accrued Interest 1,816,034 Other 443,156 666,691 . 6, Out from other funds Merchandise inventory 0,567,133 Deferred bond Issuance costs !,551,431 ' Restricted assets- 930,612 Cash end deposits Investments 118,233 Accrued Interest 14,010,244 Out from other funds 134,193 Advance to Sanitation 190,000 500,000 Fixed assets (net of accumulated depreciation) 11 !•935.268 - ' ~;1 Total Assets f2 r, L~ r, ~Y 1 v i I I Totals 10,1190 r' -S-02t ber 30. 1990 septmt i ~ Sanitation l.--- 164,881 3 4,910,11; f 82 f 39P4",120 16,412,110 4,955,141 4,533,415 963,232 S,S14,295 167,193 4, 4660046 l 943,756 349,546 19,286 667,983 ~W 8,934,111 4,004,951 366,616 1,55d,934 566,223 930,642 890,641 119,015 561,308 3,370,311 14,010,244 8,630,112 84,300 434,193 133,322 323,322 141 J2 11 i 3 5 143 500,000 $ (tonttoued) i I 1 R CITY Of OENTON TEXAS I COMBINING BALANCE SHEET - ALL ENTERPRISE FUNDS (continued) r SEPTEMBER 30 1990 ~ r l[ABILITIES AND FUNQ OU1TY Utility S 3 am LIABILITIES: Accounts Payable and accrued expenses Retainage Payable i 2,699,415 Accrued vacation leave 111,644 Meter deposits 361,501 t' i ♦IiJ Deferred Revenue 1,131,194 Payable from restricted assets- - Accrued Interest Revenue and general obligation 1,559,911 bonds payable, currant - + Due to other funds 2,900,000 Advance From Electric 8,161,861 Revenue bonds payable - General obligation bonds payable $5,110,000 I 1 Rote Payable 3 9 188 Total Liabilities i " 126 L fi1N0 EQUITY: i Contrlbuted capital. From other municipalities or governmental units In aid of construction 14,903,082 Retained earnings (deficit)- 21,432,263 Reservod for bond retirement r i Uoroserved 10,322,693 Total fund faulty (Deflclt) 93- L Total Liabilities and Fund Equity f~Wlf~ Er,~ . a i i j 0 1 r I Totals r' 1 Saltation September 30. 1990 September 30. 1901 3 = 15,448 { 2,114,923 3 2,090,113 1 - 117,644 39,989 84,011 445,573 441,094 - 1,137,794 1,005,226 13,121 10,412 1,570,449 1,132,260 122,850 3,022,850 2,553,200 115,497 8,937,364 6,161,049 500,000 500,000 - 55,110,000 38,610,000 1,055,311 1,055,311 1,176,221 5 3 6~~.59,188 53,109,073 2663,709 128 811 1 106,334,746 - 14,903,082 14,903,082 - 21,432,263 21,091,310 119,075 10,441,168 8,653,141 1 (523,593) 45,021,621 40,617,632 1404,5101 92,590,140 85,265.165 9L,159.191 tjiLl63.194 =1a1,~4,SLL ~ t 1 ,J k . ~ i E -b1- .,,Fh. A„. ax rnuy. 1 S CITY OF DENTON 1EXA~ COMBINING STATEMENT Of REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANCES All ENTERPRISE FUNDS IN RETAINED EARNINGS _ FOR THE fISCAt YEAR ENOEO SEPTEMBER 30 19 0 Utility 1 Svstem Sanit lion OPERATING REVENUES: Electric service Water service $62,680,319 f _ Sewer service 9,234,901 _ Charges for services 5,366,271 _ Sundry 366,221 3,329,646 1 144 _ 83.305 1 G• Total Operating Revenues LULL S /1 { OPERATING EXPENSES: r Purchased power Fuel 12,345,161 _ Purchase of water 1,102,344 _ Salaries and wages 2189, 236 - Materials and supplies 1,435,529 i Malntenanco and repairs 419,281 226,848 Depreciation 2,42e,99S 5".471 Miscellaneous 6,234,112 236,693 -1,532,03 Total Operating Expanses 6as J ~.U 3•,34.592 1 Operating Incase ILMAU NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES): Interest revenue Interest expense and fiscal charges 3,642,129 - Other, (5,1510184) (129,531) - 4AiLl) Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) (1.210.956) _{128.531) Incase Before Operating Transfers 13,495,366 199,aze OPERATING TRANSFERS (OUT) (6.30A.gS) (391.172) ' Net lncone ' 791860931 (191,909) RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICIT) - October 1 _4.180.482 a 1 _1204.609) RETAINED EARNINGS (OEFICIT) - Septmbar 30 IS I ' I'ryi 1 fit.' 1 -62- 1 ~ Totals year Ended September 30 1990 September 301 1989 =62,680,319 $63,996,395 ' 9,134,904 8,512,433 5,263,661 4,561,069 3,695,911 3,411,115 G:. 162.119 3,840 81 S 1 559 80,551,512 ; 42,315,461 44,312,841 1,402,344 2,535,134 184,921 9,325,165 9,160,021 1,198,132 1,213,114 3,018,466 20135,288 6,525,610 509820163 2.066.005 2.105.381 MUM 8d 68,029M 11 1 11 { (t 1$394,601 3,6/1,ii9 2,239,029 (5,2860115) (418981820) 1260.551) 1330.36 1 (1,899.4911 ) 13,695,194 8,138,921 ! (6.103,112) (5,964.620) 1 6,992,022 201140301 ~w~ 19.211. 13 46 4 1 , -43. J { r~ r e ~Y J CITY OF DENTON TEKAS } COMBINING STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION - ALL ENTERPRISE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30. 1990 utility i System Sanitation j SOURCES OF WORKING CAPITAL: operations- ^ Net Intone (toss) before extraordinary item 5 7,186,931 {(1940909) Items not requiring working capital- Depreciation 6,289,117 236,693 Amortization of bond discount and expense 39,095 - Working Capital Provided by Operations 13,516,043 41,184 1 .I Proceeds from Tong-term debt 20,549,315 500,000 # Contribullons-3 In aid of construction 340, Total Sources of Working Capital 34,406,311 541,784 USES OF WORKING CAPITAL: ; Ac uisition of pr arty, ?ant and equipment 8,164,986 7,467 ii Reduction of long-term degt 2,430,000 123,200 Net change in restricted assets and liabilities payable from restricted assets 2,258,027 253,460 Increase In long-term asset 500.000 ? Total Uses of Working Capital 13,363,011 384,127 Net Increase (Decrease) In Working Capital ILLM O S.L= ELEMENTS OF NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN WORKING CAPITAL: _ f Increase (decrease) in current assets- (/,805,231) S 7 nevstments 523,018,010 Accounts receivable 768,641 (61,231) inventory 9680711 Other current assets 4,557,633 366.321 ff Increase in Current Assets 24,507,964 345.097 1 (Increase) decrease in current liabilities- i Accounts payable and other liabilities 1131,249 240905 Meter degas is No to otter funds (2,590;819 (11 ,466) i Deferred Revenue - { (Increase) In Current Liabilities (1,454.60 ) 1440) Net Increase (Decrease) in Working Capital lualia 5+ 5 _ k w ~ M 4f t Totals 1 Year Ended September 30, 1990 September 30, 1989 j I f 6,992,022 f 2,174,301 6,525,810 5,962,163 39,995 _ 4.145 r 13,SS1,827 8,760,609 7 21,049,315 53,109,873 340,953 226.724 34,940,095 62,097.206 8,172,453 59,481,163 y 2,SS3,200 2,415,550 1 2,511,487 10300,599 1 500.000 13,737,140 63,193.312 ff4,B05,224) $(7,454,953) 223,018,010 7,301,210 707,410 1 271,046 / 968,711 649.295 ,924,154 / 1 140,302 (132,568 (3362,802 (20776,3151 (1,36351` 13,121 5, 1/ 1 (3.602,104) (1,246,408) f~1.?~9.9iS fLL~Ai.~Q> ~ 1 i i ~ ( CITT Of OENfON. TEXAS 4 SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES ALL ENTERPRISEDFUNDSINGS BUDGET AND ACTUAL - (BUDGET BASIS) - FOR~FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30 1990 Ut111t S stem variance- Favorable Bud amt _ Actual Unfavorable ; OPERATING REVENUES: =65,538,000 (62,680,9 siy 315,'096) 9,734, 904 Electric service 11,050,000 995 later service 6,254,000 5,263,661 ,339 259 000 366,271 117,211 . Sewer service 25.444 Charges for services -19,4-44 4 Sundry 83 150.000 18 124 59 S O( , 25.401) Total Operating Revenues 1,965,190 OPERATING EXPENSES: 43,815,305 41,829,425 1571988 ,I Purchased power 3,490,173 1,918,059 843,115 Fuel 1)o4O,774 8,191, 123,476 1 ~I Salarles and wages 1,02(,888 903,412 1,193,447 Materlals and supplies 3,544,700 k,3,253 4,420,404 r Maintenance and repairs 6,025, All 962,113 1 106,992 Miscellaneous 2 06 , L Capital outlay 69 0'3 42 7 761 5 11 245 Total Operating Expenses -L-- I 6 2 l- 1 Operating Income 14.156.518 20 357 105,000 3,647,)19 2,942,114 NONOPERATINO REVENUES (EXPENSES): IS I S8,1841 (5 1,584) interest revenue - 1 ) Interest expense and fiscal charges Other J Total Nonoperating Revenues 105 1 TT 956) 2 1S 4 ) (Expenses) lncome Before 14,841,Sie 16,5860121 3,iM,S4S Operating Transfers b 308 4 5) 6 3 ) OPERATING TRANSFERS IN (001) 1P, 277,600 3,744,545 u. 8,511,143 i Net Incom 1 12 4 2 4A" 44 33 RETAINED EARNINGS - October 1 8,1;9,101 RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICIT) - Septo*or 30 53,109,289 61,750,610 18udget Basis) ENCUMBRANCES AND CAPITAL OUTLAYS NET Of LUMP 7 ) (x 090,1 T) i DEPRECIATION Si r ' RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICIT) - S+p(emb+r 30 $M6 "l-111 mi" (GAAP Basis) t i r i Sanitatfon Total Variance- Variance- favorable Favorable Budget Actual unfavorable) Budoet Actual (Unfavorable) f - _ - _ - $65,538,000 $62,680,319 352,857,681 11,050,000 9,734,901 1 315,0% 6,259,000 5,263,661 1995,3391 3,455,122 3,329,646 174,524 3,401,122 3,695,917 2916795 200.000 83,305 116 695) 254.000 162.749 (91.251) 3 351 5,122 3.112,951 $7.829 86,505,12Z 01,537.55 0 4 9J . 67,572) ) 43,815,305 41,829,425 1,985,880 3,490,373 1,918,365 1,571,988 1,415,551 1,43$,529 (19,918) 10,456,325 9,632,588 823,137 297,195 278,836 18,959 1,321, 83 10182,246 142,435 372,176 599,471 (226,695 3,917,416 209500724 966,152 505,834 532,551 (26,717 6,531,511 2,137,824 4,393,681 28.300 10.842 11.458 .2,098.OOS 973.555 1,124.450 2.620.2% 2,957,229 236 913) 71,633,610 60,621.749 11,008.929 734,866 S55 12 17( 9,144) 14,071,444 20.912.$01 6,04t.351 705,000 3,647,779) 2,942,779 (128,531) (128,531) - 15 2f~;SS51 15 296,715 7 8 1) (128.531) 105,000 1 M 401 (22,604,407) 734,666 4270191 (307,675) 15,576,444 19,013,311 3,436,870 (394,137) 3,94.737) (6,703,112) 16.703.112) 3400129 32,454 (307,67S) 8,873,272 12,3100112 30436,870 -1501.409) -(209.609) 297,11100 41.368.737 49.211.313 4.902.636 (167,280) (177,155) (9,875) 530242,009 61,S81,SIS 8,339,506 (227.363) (227,363) - jS18.120) 51 ,318,1201 $ jam) s.L"W) s_LLM) SUJ&Uu siQa2iia39i $JAI83a506 -dl- 3 S • 1 , F Y 1 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET - UTILITY SYSTEM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Electric ASSETS System t € Cash and deposits = 102,151 I i j Investments 29,073,155 i Receivables (net of allowances for uncollectibTes)- Accounts 4,95S,141 unbilled utility service 3,673,945 n Accrued Interest 699,083 Other 196,105 , Due from other funds 9,514,866 r Merchandise inventory 11554,931 Deferred bond Issuance costs $00,101 Restricted assets- Cash and deposits 213,911 1 Investments 7,959,592 Accrued Interest 72,607 Due from other funds 61,913 Advance to Sanitation 500,000 Fixed assets (net of accumulated depreciation) 33,142,279 Total Assets U = ry r , 1 I 1 'Mill I 4 r _ Totals for Utility Svste~n water and Sever System September 30. 1990 SSe teyber 30. 1989 f 62,348 f 164,805 = 4,970,036 i 10,416,965 39,490,120 16,472,110 - 4,955,141 4,533,415 1,142,094 4,916,039 5,362,264 244,873 9431156 466,046 s, 112,292 668,691 2$3,867 52,561 8,567,433 41009,600 f 1,5540934 $06,223 430,541 930,642 890,647 174,316 449,233 5,810,311 6,050,652 14,010,244 6,130,712 610586 134,193 84,308 i !28,121 190,000 500,000 100,192.9 89 141,93S.26 g t40.139.389 s3T 1 SINJUAN _s 1 -b9- i 41 i i t CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET - UTILITY SYSTEM SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Electric LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY System L.: LIABILITIES: Accounts payable and accrued expenses 3 21225,411 rl Retalnage payable 11,460 1. ' Accrued vacatloo leave 243,468 I Deposits 1,131,794 Payable from restricted assets- Accrued Interest 807,553 j Revenue bonds payable, current 1,581,250 A Due to other funds 500,000 C Revenue bonds payable 28,546,880 Notes Payable Total 1.14114103 =35.089 FUND EQUITY: ` Contributed capital- From other municipalities or governmental units 13,060 ; R In aid of coostructlon 1,223,616 Retained earnings- j. Reserved for bond retirement 5,919,196 Unreserved 49.275,551 F Total Fund Equity 56,491.473 I Total Liabilities and Fund Equity 41 r G f r u L i -ro- I 4 it w ~e Totals for utility system- _ Water and Sewer System September 30, 1990 September 30, 1989 3 473,996 f 2,699,415 1 2,041,696 70,184 111,644 39,989 118,031 361,502 365,687 1,137,194 1,005,226 1 7S2,424 1,559,977 1,120,125 { 1,310,150 2,900,000 2,430,000 II 7,661,867 9,161,861 5,511,018 21,163,120 55,710,000 38,610,000 53 ¢5 18 53,659.19 53,109,673 91 217 126,307,441 104,294,214 14,890,022 14,903,082 14,903,082 20,208,581 21,432,263 21,091,310 4,343,507 10,322,693 8,534,666 (2,930,331) 16.341,220 40,946,316 36,511,18S 931M.2S8 85,475,374 i I .ii_ 4 ; T a CITY OF OENTON. TEXAS COMBINING SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS - UTILITY SYSTEM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30 1990 i.. Electric Water and System Sower System j y. OPERATING REVENUES: $62,680,319 3 G Electric service _ 9,731,904 Water service _ 5,263,661 Sever service 366,271 charges for services 14 / Sundry 15.0]A.004 0 Total Operating Revenues 63.O16.S90 J OPERATING EXPENSES: 41,226,351 1,117,110 Purchased power 1,392,204 10,143 1- Fuel - Purchase of water 3,546,031 Salaries and wages 4,344,245 384,560 5290121 Materials and supplies 10111,754 1,361,211 Maintenance and repairs 21866,590 3,422,S27 - Depreciation 1 Mlscellaneous 10 ' Total Operating Expenses 52,339.193 .~aSSl,9Z5 Operating Inane 10,707.39 NONOPERATiNG REVENUES (EXPENSES): 2,348,125 1,259,054 (2,825,4851 Interest revenue r r L. ! Interest expense and fiscal charges (2,332,699) (130-S50) ) Other 7 ) !x.43 Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) ! (1.524 10,632,813 2,662,493 lncanr Before Operating Transfers OPERAIING TRANSFERS (OUT) x,612.024)) 7,020,644 168,081 Net Income 94233.Q93. 1,247 RETAINED EARNINGS -October I RR~ =waeyrar~ RETAINED EARNINGS - September 30 ' j I -T2- a P i I t V 1 l ! ~ Totals for Witty System Year Ended Se~tenber 30, 199030. 1990 Sep 9Tk 30. 1989 i 162,680,319 $63,9%,355 9,734,904 8,512,433 5,263,661 4,567,069 ` j 366,271 229,240 19,444 - r 1A 124 99 17,365,131 42,345,467 44,312,611 1,402,344 2,535,134 161,927 7,890,236 1,610,118 919,284 909,612 2,478,995 2,272,034 6,289,117 5,746,164 1,532,834 .222 2.021 62,858,27 6 993 1 1 6 2 11 i t ! 3 647 119 2,239,829 (5,26,181(1•( 32.E ) ~ (260,551) (1,110,9541 tj."2341 13,495,366 8,4181134 E 1 (6,300.43 5} 45,12S.102) 1,186,93! 20153,632 ; u 49,400,982 46,121.350 -,3 s sa9lseoe~ i I i I I i I i ti t ~M 1 .1 1 a 111 Y i .1 M i C' r i i i I -74- L I r~ CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDEO SEPTEMBER 30. 1990 1 SUMMARY OF INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS i Working Capital Fund. - to account for the financing of goods and services R - provided by the Warehouse, Municipal Garage, and Machine Shop to other City IJ departments. Such costs provided by the Warehouse are billed to the other departments at standard labor charges and cost of parts plus 12%. G Municipal Garage and Machine Shop billings include labor charges and cost of parts plus 25%. Actual costs include depreciation on the building, improvements, machinery and equipment used to provide the service. Motor Pool Fund - to account for the purchase of City vehicles not budgeted in other funds. These vehicles are then leased to other City departments. Monthly charges are equal to the vehicle cost less salvage value divided by expected life of vehicle. F 11 i I y j -75- I~ M! 3 -lip } n o CITY OF OENTON; TEXAS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET - ALL INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 ASSETS Working ? CO LP tat for Pool ~Cash aid deposits = 901 f 11,263 E Investments - 4,422,505 l Receivables 559 50,163 t. Due from other funds _ Merchandise inventory 1,560,649 r Fixed assets (net of accumulated depreciation) 293.951 6 7 I III Total Assets fI,ASSjS2 fl's7 p till LIABILITIES AND FM EQUITY LIABILITIES: Accounts payable and accrued expenses = 125,633 = 162,721 Leases payable 35,218 _ Accrued vacation and sick leave 21,469 I I Due to other funds 1,360,663 Contractual obligation 2.130.000 Total Liabilities 1,542,983 2.592.121 FUND EQUITY: r Contributed Capital- From other municipalities or goverwonlal units 231,391 3, 2NS, 6 Retained earnings Total Fund Equity 312.976 4.318.251 , Total Liabilities and Fund Equity swum i x. I -76. 1 r. ts', i~'~Fit6:~;Pa rvW°,+Ye•%ls i l i r A TouIs September 30. 1990 Septa*er 30, 1989 f 12,064 f 804,918 4,422,505 1,910,343 50,122 69,932 c. - 433,000 1,560,648 1,305,331 2.920.995 2,945,621 - f3.p26.9~ fd.lia.]50 ~ . f 268,354 f 214,921 35,218 92,981 21,469 16.682 1,360,663 10281,416 2,130.000 1,295, 000 4.135.104 2.891.012 4,161,111 3,884,336 f 124.053 693,810 4,01,230 4.518.146 ~J ±1 41- J S 1 ' CITY OF OENTON TExAS ~ e~ COMBINING SIATEMENT Of REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS - ALL INTERNAL SERVILE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30 1990 W Working Ital LP r- OPERATING REVENUES: $3,171,957 am 4 charges for goods and services 13.064 Miscellaneous 3 1 01 i 1,y2 9,110 Total Operating Revenues OPERATING EXPENSES: S00371 Salaries and wages 201956471 l Materials and suPPlles 24,412 _ 1,359,103 airs 21,156 Maintenance and re P Depreciation 212 OS 6.023 Miscellaneous i' 0 4 1 1 5 1 ~ y, Total Operating Expenses 81 61 A6 16) operating Income (loss) ` NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES). _ (44,163) i L Gain (loss) on disposal 245,302 12~~) 163 1 1 Interest revenue ' Interest expense and fiscal charges 31.624 Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) ) ,a f Not IACW* (Loss) RETAl11E0 EARNINGS (DEftClt)- October 1 .MUM RETAINED EARNINGS -September 30 r j L_ j _76- t, R ~ Totals Year Ended S_goto*er 30. 1990 Seatottr 30, 1989 i =5,036,151 55,241,525 21.394 38.562 5.061.151 25, 86,081 594,311 519,942 f 20195,111 2,921,621 1 24,412 51,604 ! 1 10386,259 1,186,264 1i 270,034 - 272a33 5,068.553 4.951.166 (4.402) _ 32$.319 (44,163) 11,636 245,302 2240901 34,645 111,933 306243 4600252 $93,010 233.551 =_2Z~.Gii ~ 69 .ly. I S a ~9r ~ AI.Wif/~ awl 1 1 1 CITY OF DENTONr TEXAS COMBINING STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION - ALL INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Working capital Motor Pool SOURCES OF 1a1RCI4G CAPITAL: Operations- G Net Income (loss) { 18,633 { (48,390) Items not requiring working capital- 1 Depredation 21,156 1.359.103 1 Working Capital Provided (Used) by Operations 105,189 13310,113 Proceeds from sale of contractual obligation 1.650.000 1 Ii Total Sources of Working Capital 105.189 2,"0.113 € USES OF WORKING CAPITAL: ! Acquisition of property, plant and equipment 520191 1,025,988 Reduction of long-term debt Total Uses of Working Capital 52,191 I•S30.9" Net Increase in Working Capital : rs9~i >t 7 ~ I ELEMENTS OF NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN WORKING CAPIIALT Increase (decrease) In current assets- r Cash and deposits 3 801 s (133,65s) is Investments - 205120162 Accounts receivable (35,936) 16,126 Inventory 255,311 - L Other current assets (61,244) (311.1561 150,932 1.423.411 h (Increase) decrease In current liabillties- Accounts payable and other liabilities (16,402) (41043) Clio to other funds 189.530 10.241 (105,240) 6,248 Net Increase In working capital $a xis i r I 1 V e1 . , ,16l Totals i Year Ended SeDtvter 30. 1990 September 30. 1989 a f 30,?43 f 460,252 1,306,259 1. 86.261 i 11416,502 1,646,516 P 1 6_. 50.000 1_ SS•000 , 3,066.50 -2,401,576 11018,785 245,000 ..~4~~4Q 1.059.009 !,583.185 _1.301.004 9LliLlLi f { (132,854) {(1,032,381) ' 2,512,162 1,910,3q (196210) 65,102 255,311 (107,464) .,l~13,,QQQ) .1211.90/) U LM 623.69D (20,•t/S) 363,333 J `(14.211) 110.414 I (99.692) _ 413.111 J II.Yi,lu f l 41- 4 f 4 T J CITY OF DENTON iEXA i SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS - 7 F BUDGETF AND ACTUAL ENOEI.MET BASIS)30 WORKING CAPITAL FUND OR TH PIE B Norkin Ca ital Fund Variance- Favorable _ Budoet Actual Unfavorable i OPERATING REVENUES: 14,001,160 $3,1f1,951 {129,203' r Charges for goods and services Sundry 46 119! 4 031 1 85 4 ~ 9 r Total operating Revenues I $19,656 519,584 12 OParie EXPENSES: 2,812,199 213,966 1 Salari yl Sales and wages 3,086,165 10,114 Materials and suppiles 63,410 22,696 16,896 Maintenance and repairs 211,894 254,998 Miscellaneous 15.1 1 13 S Capital Outlay 1 1 1'01_ 6 923 ¢ y Total 00eratinq Expenses JWM 34.10 Operating InCWA - ~ f11 _ 1:,9b1) (2.981) NONOPERJ11lN0 REVENUES (EXPENSES): - Interest expanse and fiscal charges Total Nonoperatinq Aevenues _ _ 12.911) _+94~) (Expenses) 45,441 31,201 41,231 Net Inca" RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICIT) - October 1 IIT.N) (Budgetary hosts) 1~604) 31,201 RETAINED EARN1N05 (DEFICIT) Sep tW*40 30 (320011) ( (Budgetary bas(s) ENCL40RWES AND CAPITAL OUTt11YS NET OF 33.IA4 ' DEPRECIATION RETAINED EARNINGS - Se06*6r 30 S~r~ 1.,.,31eSt9 imAW Y (OAAP balls) i -82- l E 1 T~ \ CITY OF OENTON TEXAS fOR THE F[SCA! YEAR ENOEO SEPTEMBER ~0 79 0 SUMMARY Of TRUST AHD ArENCY FUNOc EXPENDABLE TRUST FUND x Em to ee insurance - to account for accumulation of resources for the payment of employee insurance claims and insurance policies, c i! AGENCY FUNDS Pa r l - to account for the collection and payment of the City's payroll and associated liabilities, Deferred Cemeene Lion - to account for the City employees' investment in a deferred compensation plan, y C i -83. 1 E/■■ i CITY OF DENTON. TEARS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET - ALL TRUST AND AGENCT FUNDS SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 ASSETS Expendable Trust Fund Cash and deposits : 256,106 k Investments 2,968,231 II Receivables. Accrued interest 50,511 Ocher 36,188 E Due from other funds t Total Assets fLr~i i LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE ? f 31,641 ~ o Accounts payable , I Claims payable 923 45 4 961,300 i Total Liabilities Fund balance 2,350&1 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance = • L I ,a r I i.J ~k E r- 1 ~s l.a f ; S y a _ Totals Agency funds SeDteffwr 30. 1990 Septwttr 30, 1989 = 5910913 = 846,019 11,139,321 _ 2,9680231 1,164,439 v $0,511 38,434 9,546 46,334 12,226 _ 664,500 664,500 3,019,003 C_ si.tbs.~ss =4's1~1.66_t sss~soa j =1,265,959 11,303,800 $3,381,206 I I _ 923ASI 9610336 11265,959 20221,259 4,354,542 r.j 2 .,350,402 2,218,961 7 v i i f r l i i "O,Y I I 41 I i l 1 D 'r i CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN ASSETS MO LIABILITIES - ALL AGENCY FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED EFTEf~ER 30 1990 Balance October 1, 19@4 i PAYROLL FUNO ASSETS 3 400 Other receivables 3004 140 Due from other funds Total Assets 3 ILAtLU 11 i! 1 ~ Accounts payable :3.004.540 Total Liabilities 4 DIEF,ERREO COMPENSATION FUND ASES Cash and deposits 310.001 Total Assets S sT'' L_ r ` LIAMLITIES s 310.001 l Accounts payable - do to participants Total Liabilities I TOTAL, ANKY FUNDS Flit Cash and deposits 1 310,0 Other receivables ~ 0 1 ow (ran other funds L^+ Total Assets f~,,~i9.621 UABRIT1 Accounts payable {3.374.621 ~;+7a s1 Total liabilities I 4~ it 46- i 4 ~N 000 Balance Addl IOnS Oeductlons SeDtender 30. 1990 f 9,146 s - ti 9,546 21344,640 664,500 ii ( i+ { f 1~ 4.046 j r+± s - $2,33S.494 9231.133 s 15.301 f 591.91; r situ s_.~: s~s~ s 541.913 :231.133 f _ 15,341 sULM s-'= f-s9L9y1 $231,133 15,301 { 591,913 9,146 - 9$46 E.~i4+4lQ 664.SQQ 12lE.?1a sia~i9.+~fi ~ ' I I $U LM 12,3y fl.24i.4~4 '6' s -61- ~ ~i L~ H K i' ~ij y' L ~ 1 , S t3 ~ r M. I Ua C t e[yy1 . r` ~ f ~ ~ r., t , { R tLr 4 Ly ~ i l i I ! ~ -68- ~ L i ,.a 1 '1 ..r y a i low, i i CITY OF OENTON, TEXAS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENOEO SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 GENERAL FUND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES _ BUOGET AND ACTUAL C i , •89- 1 CITY OF OENTON. TEXAS i GENERAL FUND - SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES - j BUDGET AND ACTUAL i 3 FOR THE FISCAL YEAA ENDED SEPTEMBER 30 1990 Variance- Favorable i Budoet Actual Un avorable j i GENERAL GOVERNMENT: 1 Administration (00011 = 354,390 4 347,227 f 1,163 r Personal Services 12,930 14,913 (1,9631 Supplies 911 1,013 (92) ' C4,. Maintenance 19,352 76,569 1BI ,352 53 Services' 17,129 11,075 Sundry ~25~ 201 i Fixed Assets _j44-9J7 159 5.961 Code Enforcement (0036) 99,396 101,525 (2,421) Personal Services 5,450 6,502 (1,052) Supplies 1,406 1,631 (2293 7 Maintenance _._LW r` - " services -Ulm Building Operations (0002) 201$42 20501SA 13,!16) Personal Services 3250D 26,051 1,119 401 supplies 117,200 Main T1.~~ ( 2. ; Maintenance 889.168 ) i~ , if Servleus --Magi -AN&M QUEST 100031 341036 320635 10101 is 36 Personal Services 2,S23 2,167 r Supplies 23 23 Maintenance 10169 3,659 810 Services 4.60 Fired Assets r 43 t_ t ' I p " I~ 7 Y C :f In 1 i f j r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS GENERAL FUND - SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL (CONTINUED) j FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30. 1990 1 Variance- Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Word Processing (0006) Personal Services f 148,908 > 150,535 j (1,627) Supplies 15,550 14,576 974 Maintenance 26,026 23,801 2,225 Services 7.412 6.264 1.148 191.896 195.116 2.720 Personnel 10008) Personal services 334,761 323,162 11,599 supplies 26,866 27,069 (203) Maintenance 3,160 1,881 1,279 Services 57,868 50,083 70785 Sundry 8.000 01002 (22) ( i 1 430.6S5 410,197 20,458 1 - Information Servlces (0017) Persona( services 433,240 380,132 $2,508 Supplies 41,486 37,681 3,805 Maintenanct 88,032 79,063 8,969 Services 249,547 232,614 16,933 Sundry 250 233 17 Fixed Assets 23.E 401 22,976 835,932 730.724 105.208 legal Administration (0004) Personal Services 315,881 3130130 2,154 supplies 7,SSO 60194 (641) Maintenance 907 10108 (201) Services 32,328 21,992 10,335 Sundry 1,893 1,361 532 Fixed Assets 4,000 WM -(99) 312.562 360.481 12,070 z t F! i i y .-.4 i CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS GENERAL FUND - SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Variance- favorable Budoet Actual (Unfavorablal I Municipal Court Judge (0005) Personal Services f 90,135 = 90,336 f (201) Supplies 1,800 11305 49S Maintenance 00 39S S Services 5.580 4.829 TS1 G:c i 97.915 96.865 11050 Municipal Services (0009) Personal Services 146,565 148,017 $48 Supplies 3,571 3,506 71 Maintenance 366 30S 61 - i Services 13,208 11,594 1,614 1 Sundry Fixed Assets 6.009 5.767 242 172.125 169,563 2•S62 s+l Library Administration (0070) Personal Services 120,356 122,372 (2,016) Supplies 16,600 160565 35 Maintenance 1,650 1,615 35 1 i Services 52.896 62,419 _ (9.523) - , 202.911 469) E Library Support Services (0072) Personal Services 311,796 304,782 13,014 11 Maintenance 1,900 1,993 (93) Services 2,850 _ M29 (279) 322.546 _ 309,904 12.612 Library Adult Services (0073) Personal Services 160, 789 749,907 882 Supplies i Maintenance 4,967 4,825 142 l" Services 450 298 152 36,472 35,361 1,111 Fixed Assets 54,926 55.121 i 257.664 255,510 9 i 5 f -92- i 1 1 ~ Ian#~ CITY OF OENTON. TEXAS GENERAL FUNO - SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES - 1 - BUDGET ANO ACTUAL (CONiINUEO) ~I FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENOEO SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 J Variance- Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) j Library Children Services (0074) ' Personal Services 138,817 { 139,289 : (472) Supplies 2,000 2,000 - Services 500 464 36 i Fixed Assets 28,237 211058 1,119 r 169.554 168,811 143 R Finance Administration (0020) Personal Services 211,097 183,396 27,701 Supplies 4,175 2,565 1,610 Maintenance 100 10 90 Services 21,526 18,842 2,684 Fixed Assets 897 - 891 1 j w 2311.7-95 204.813 32,982 Purchasing (0021) Personal Services 191,166 171,509 13,657 3 Supplies 7,880 9,075 (11195) Maintenance 2,000 833 1,167 Services 21,12S 18.015 3.110 222.171 205.432 16.139 customer service (0022) Personal Services 614,941 559,215 550726 supplies 120,708 125,914 (502%) Maintenance 4,500 680 3,820 Services 132,969 760929 56,040 Fixed Assets _ 20 .677 2.S23 76 163.115 11 Cashiering (0023) Personal Services 2070129 213,823 (6,691) 1 Supplies 3,400 3,072 328 Maintenance 300 318 (re) services 9.150 9.538 61 it _._31 414 225,011 IS.A32) a s Il L M~ -93- I' 7 1 r~ 1 It CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS GENERAL FUND - SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES BUDGET AND ACTUAL (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 i variance- Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Accounting (0024) Personal services f 394,8% S 389,936 f 4,%0 supplies 13,350 16,565 (3,215) Maintenance 120 S94 126 Services 12,%0 12,096 864 ! r. Fixed Assets SOO 452 48 1 422,426 419.643 2,783 r. t Tax (0025) Personal Services 51,302 51,566 (264) Supplies 8,195 6,883 1,312 Maintenance 85 23 62 l Services 2,500 1.632 868 62,082 60,104 1,978 ( Municipal Court Clerks 100261 Personal services 186,260 180,688 5,572 p Supplies 21,401 16,63S 4,166 ` Maintenance ?DO 6S7 43 I Services 9,750 5,535 4,215 Fixed Assets 2 2r„9 i 218.41 203a.014 _ 14a5% 7 Finanoe Administration Misc. (020M) Services 1670500 S4,S16 1120984 Sundry 761.991 625.915 141,902 .935, . 600•4' 2scsi erg Accounting Misc. (024M) Personal Services 105,800 - 105,800 services 180,000 119,871 600129 r1 Insurance 5670256 567,196 60 Sundry 381.675 178.918 202,127 1 f 1.234.131 ~ f i , -94- I A r j I 1 1 I CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS GENERAL FUND - SCHEDULE DF EXPENDITURES - SUDGET ANO ACTUAL (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Variance- Favorable Budoet Actual Unfavorable Planning and Development (DOTS) Personal Services f 378,555 f 360,096 f 18,459 Supplies 21,200 19,618 1,522 C ` Maintenance 8$0 $33 317 I Services 41,670 39,308 20562 Sundry 6,210 2,860 3,350 i 448,685 422,475 26,210 I Inspectlon (0011) Personal Services 309.923 303,312 6,611 Supplies 11,528 10,925 503 1 I` Maintenance 3,191 5,562 (1,770) , Services 13,669 10,356 3,313 Sundry 270 229 41 ` Fixed Assets 4,533 3,362 1,171 f f i 343,115 333,746 9.969 Planning and Development Misc. (0151M) Sundry 158,800 161,"j (3,141) 158,800 161,991 (3,197) Total General Government f i 1 i i r1 + r+ -g5- I h I ~ R -Will 1 CITY_ OF DENTON = TEIUS GENERAL FUND - SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL (CONTINUED) ; FOR THE FISCAL YEAR END 0 SEPTEMBER 30 1990 r 1 Yarianc!- Favorable Budoet Actual Unfavorable PUBLIC N0RK5: Engineering (0010) 3 856,338 { 850,515 S 5,763 r f Personal Services 28,280 28,235 as Supplies 10,851 11,237 (386) Maintenance 32.616 29 14 3.231 Services 928.145 919 4 8.656 Transportation Engineering (0012) 215,581 211,253 4,318 Personal Services 10,631 9,241 1,590 Supplies 104,100 98,961 5,139 Maintenance 35.611 22.121 13.196 Services r 366.i? 341.586 21.543 Airport (0019) 181800 78,187 613 r- personal Services 1,750 5,180 (730) Supplies 3,955 3,660 295' Maintenance 8,376 8,207 Services Jl . Sundry 96,501. 96.294 .~m Cmmnity Services AAeinistratloo (0030) 149,564 149,434 130 h Personal Services 4,870 4,024 046 Supplies 1$44 2,830 (1,406} Maintenance 120220 7,636 4,592 Services 3 300 sundry 60 1 9 / 0 { Street patching (0031) 340,523 345,611 (5,154} Personal Services 34,120 43,957 (9,029) supplies 411,955 3610155 27.800 a Maintenance 4 1 3 y services - _ edp=per 003,125 36 7 I I TO, Y e t Poo CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS r ~ GENERAL FUND - SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30. 1990 Variance- favorable Budget Actual (Uniavorablel Street Sweeping/Drainage (0032) f Personal Services 225,462 9 2270977 f (2,SIS) Supplies 33,204 36,191 (31581) Maintenance 90,251 87,041 3,210 Services 22,648 14,694 80154 Fixed Assets 31.820 29,794 2,026 403.585 396.297 7.288 t Street Construction (0033) Personal Services 296,363 299,266 (2,903) Supplies 14,118 15,269 (1,151) Maintenance 281,815• 2B5,OSO 13,235) Services 90,272 73,309 16,%3 Fixed Assets 12.993 12.993 - _ 69S.S61 665.887 9.674 F~ Street Lighting (0034) Services 373,000 345.156 (22.156) 1- 373,000 395 156 (22,1%) r i r"' Envlronerntal Health Services (0035) Personal Services 111,359 111,458 (99) Supplies 4,800 3,680 1,120 services 7,513 4.250 3,163 { 129.672 125,388 4,284 Animal Control (0044) Personal Services 205,620 198,917 6,703 Supplies 23,385 18,143 5,242 Maintenance 12,800 7,532 5,268 Services 30,757 25,137 S,620 Fixed Assets 3,025 2,951 74 275,587 MAN 22.901 Total Public Works $AJ= $ 4.1 f~ _91_ r~ WF -w 411117W R Y owl CITY OF OENTON. TEXAS GENERAL FUND - SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30 19% Variance- Favorable, Budget Actual (Unfavorable) i 't s PARKS 8 RECREATION: Parks 6 Recreation Administration (DO60) = 170,669 = 149,006 : 21,669 Personal Services i-, 31,150 29,566 2,184 1 Maintenance ,500 998 S02 Services 25,128 27,376 (2,248) 300 238 62 Sundry 229.347 201.178 22.169 Recreation (0062) 678,641 641,928 36,769 i Personal Servftes 59,921 62,292 (2,355) j Supplies 65,825 18,276 41,549 Maintenance 184,609 235,891 (46,282) Services 566 566 r Sundry 10,933 11,619 1186) Fixed Assets 1.005.461 969,972 3S.495 Park Maintenance (0064) 738,128 734,264 3,864 Personal Services 669935 62,963 3,972 Supplies 93,450 107,918 (14,528) { Maintenance 112,985 910352 21,633 Services 150 1,717 Sundry (1,667) S Fixed undry Assets 30,000 28.192 L ~ 1.011.618 ,1.026.466 1S.1111 i« Total Parks i RecMatlon I1 I E i S r r -98- 1 L •r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS GENERAL FUND - SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENOED SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Variance- Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) PUBLIC SAFETY: Police (0040) Personal Services $ 4,575,828 4,494,884 s 80,944 Supplies 210,567 183,882 26,685 Maintenance 149,686 163,562 (13,876) Services 452,196 412,873 39,323 Sundry 13,446 9,146 4,300 Fixed Assets _ 55,989 42.518 13,371 -5,457,612 5,306,065 150,747 Fire Administration (0050) Personal Services 330,250 308,804 21,446 Supplies 25,200 21,486 (21296) Maintenance 57,008 54,006 3,002 Services 108,333 107,491 842 Sundry s Fined Assets 8,113 8.102 533 1 529,704 506,756 22,948 Fire Operations (OOS1) Personal Services 2,822,i91 2,978,447 (156,250) Supplies 67,200 61,064 6,136 Maintenance 384946 51,417 (12,471) Services 111,348 118,609 (34,261) Fixed Assets 100,155 93,636 6•S19 3,172.04 3,363,173 (190,327) i j I M CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS ' GENERAL FUND - SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 i Variance- Favorable Budoeet _ Actual (Unfavorable f~ Fire Prevention (0052) ` Personal Services { 146,841 S 123,687 S 23,154 C;• Supplies 3,700 4,255 (555) Maintenance 7,000 7,423 (423) Services 10.747 10.433 314 G 168.288 145.798 22.490 fro, 1 Emergency Medical Services (00531 Personal services 677,913 660,441 9,422 , Supplies 51,488 41,836 4,652 E Maintenance 20,675 14,524 6,146 ► . Services 118,004 87,080 30,424 Fixed Assets 2,666 S99 2.067 i. r 870.746 812.S35 _ 58.211 Emergency Management (0007) _ Personal Services 47,853 470606 247 Supplies 6,163 3,827 2,336 Maintenance 1,510 11813 1303) j Services 2.483 14Q~) 68, 67.S S 413 Total Public Safety f14juhm Slpaaja _ GRAND TOTAL GENERAL FUND SWAIM SAM M IJAU 373 i i 1 ; i t E } J { Y r i ~ I Ir I I 1 U.J STATISTICAL SECTION I 1 s r I I t E i i t I ti I 1 R E ar • 1 t i t I CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTION (1) LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS 3 ' I Fiscal General Public Public Year Government Safety Works 1981 3 3,992,254 $4,173,188 (1,077,134 1982 4,348,188 4,805,245 1,208,589 r E1983 4,170,991 5,020,458 2,180,879 1984 4,673,090 5,531,882 20785,622 1985 6,191,869 6,363,330 3,071,489 1986 6,501,953 70156,369 3,690,350 1987 7,498,530 10742,987 3,630,471 r 1988 8,468,435 8,3180904 4,040,489 1989 10,842,100 901500314 4,3670287 1990 10,470,382 10,1840816 412280457 3 ,I (1) Includes General, Special Revenue, and Debt Service Funds (2) 1981-1982 Capital Outlay also included in Departmental Totals (3) Difference due to advance refunding of General Obligations bonds and , Certificates of Obligation in November, 1985. -102- . i 1 r ~1 .1 Ww,+'.e.• r Table 1 : I r ; Parks and Capital Debt y Recreation Other Outlay (2) Service Total j $ 936,673 $421,490 $ 378,642 $1,959,547 $12,560,286 1,137,957 352,673 256,346 10882,987 13,735,639 1,257,726 - 513,377 1,746,561 14,889,992 1,498,226 - 385,783 2,392,858 17,267,461 1,719,742 - 1,016,119 2,4190528 20,782,077 20110,862 - 1 044 401 157,146(3) 20,661,081 212520215 - 390,359 3,663,923 25,178,485 h, 2,3069053 - 448,593 41164,783 27,747,257 2,397,948 - 403,533 51508,631 3206690813 2,645,692 - 574,721 4,5860442 32,690,510 r I 3 s - -103- e S CITY OF DENTON TEXAS GENERAL REVENUES BY SOURCE (1) LAST TEH F1 CAL YEARS i Fiscal Licenses Utility Inter- Year and Taxes Franchise Governmental Permits Fees Revenue C 1981 j 60992,999 = 82,494 $232,990 $1,258,829 7982 7,895,579 96,943 330,694 985,405 1983 8,819,953 213,490 367,937 1,036,903 r 1984 10,405,911 303,725 418,680 826,575 1985 11,8450499 356,661 484,171 1,210,019 7986 13,838,013 379,238 3770960 i,T91,435 1987 15,865,362 280,111 426,319 r 1,123,194 ~ 1988 17,394,836 211,999 650,879 ` 1,179,092 r- 1989 18,574,210 222,756 595,142 i,661,445 1990 18,996,832 2610060 5770186 1,480,669 (1) Includes General, Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds f w i r R S ~ -104- - 6 I, Table 2 i. Fees for Fines and Interest Miscellaneous C' vices Forfeitures Revenue Revenue Total = 207,385 r, 247,140 1165,635 f 2160508 >i 9,403,980 i 186,716 397,510 153,435 365,067 10,411,349 245,808 561,214 1101189 469,270 11,8249764 494,212 6169826 192,196 6420452 13,900,577 1,168,613 715,044 330,026 272,088 16,442,181 1,050,070 659,194 245,555 836,803 19,178,268 i 1,128,764 7800748 347,415 9189656 20,870,629 I 10312,662 1,144,911 600,178 1,0060108 23,500,665 1,2988206 1,232,766 808,280 2,0739450 26,486,255 1,297,881 1,257,651 748,200 1,485,608 26,105,107 l F 1 .,.I ff ~ i CITY Of OENT-ORt TEXAS PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Fiscal Percent Delinquent L. Total Current Tax of Levy Tax Year Tax Levy Collections Collection Collections 1981 S 4,359,541 $ 4,062,043 93.17% $107,472 , 1982 40930,971 40746,613 96.26 137,078 I 1983 5,376,210 50122,101 95.27 148,741 1984 509950965 (1) 5,786,881 96.51 166,763 1985 6,808,874 (1) 6,625,734 97.31 167,360 I. 1986 89516,906 (1) 80164,114 95.86 2280806 1987 10,801,306 (1) 10,474,516 96.97 3030649 1988 1201929485 (1) 11,741,034 96.30 313,375 f 1989 12,646,346 (1) 12,281,164 97.11 441,851 ~W 1990 13,167,415 (1) 1201190236 96.60 336,907 r r (1) Denton Central Appraisal District' 1 . 1 . I 1 w~ 11 j P ,1J Table 3 Total Outstanding Collections Delinquent f as a Percent Outstanding Taxes as a I Total Tax of Current Delinquent Percent of I Sollecttons Levv Taxes Current Levy S 401690515 95.64% S 5850785 13.43% ' 4,8830691 99.04 723,596 14.67 5,270,848 98.04 1,065,234 19.81 5,953,644 99.29 1,269,189 21.17 - 6,793,094 99.77 1,359,577 19.97 i` i 8,392,920 98.54 100190080 71.97 10,778,165 99.79 1,0421749 9,65 12,0544409 98.87 1,0640131 8.73 12,723,015 100.61 1,133,897 8.97 13,056,143 99.15 1,2750664 9.69 i r f E i , -107- r. , Me } 1 CITY OF DENTONe TEXAS y ASSESSED AND ESTIMATED ACTUAL VALUE OF TAXABLE PROPERTY LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS ` Real Prooertv Personal Property Fiscal Assessed Estimated Assessed Estimated h Year Value Actual Value Value Actua_ wlne 1981 S 246,205,248 S 410,342,080 S 910743,693 $152,906,154 1982 450,132,259 450,732,259 212,704,829 21207040829 1983 (1) 831,397,479 831,397,479 218,5490070 218,549,070 r. 226,252,045 226,252,045 1984 (1) 901,334,546 901,334,506 1985 (1) 919,943,824 919,9431824 234,0929434 234,092,434 ' 1986 (1) 10176,422,567 1,176,422,567 2670120,891 267,120,841 r 1,52106360234 105210636,234 298,8270706 248,8279746 ! 1487 (1) 1988 (1) 10758,860,855 1,758,860,855 2916433,122 291,433,722 304,9110159 3049411,159 L- ~ 1984 (1) 1,833,449,786 1,833,449,78b 1990 (1) 1,776,614,695 1,776,6141695 362,3861866 3621386,866 i L (1) Denton Central Appraisal District -108- i` I i Table 4 r . Total Ratio of Total Assessed to Assessed Estimated Total Estimated Value Actual Value Actual 9 337,948,941 = 56302480234 60li 663 431,088 663,437,088 100 1,049,946,549 1,049,946,549 100 11127,586,551 1,127,586,551 100 1,154,036,258 1,154,036,258 100 a 1,443,543,458 1,443,543,458 100 1,820,463,940 1,820,4630940 100 2,050,244,577 2,050,294,577 100 2,138,360,945 21138,3600945 100 2,139,001,561 2,139,0010561 100 r, ~9. ~ 1 y s. OY+~'..p Table 5 CITY OF DENTON TEXAS J~ PROPERTY TAX RATES AND TAX LEVIES I` DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTS 1 LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS TAX_RATES (Per 5100 of Assessed va~°•ionl Fiscal ty_ Oichool i Year C1 strict Co_ unty State Total 1987 1.2900 1.250 ^ 1982 0.1140 1.220 1700 .00 3,3100 1983 0.5100 0.130 2370 .00 2.2310 1984 0.5600 0.810 •1665 .00 1.4065 1985 0.5900 0.880 •2120 .00 1.5820 1986 0.5900 0.850 •2116 .00 1.6816 1987 0.5900 0.790 1750 .00 1.6150 f 1988 0.5928 .2308 .00 1.6108 Ir 0.770 . 1989 0.5928 0.830 2254 .00 1.5882 .2259 .6487 1990 0.6183 1.065 .2410 00 1. .00 1.9243 9243 The tax rate decreased in fiscal year 1982 pursuant to an increase in assessed L valuation from 60% to 100% of estimated actual value of all taxable property. TA L VIES Fiscal School Year City District -SggnU__ 1981 Total 606 1982 S 4,930,911 S 8,136,514 S 6,846,688 _ 518,146,173 1983 5,376,210 8,841,258 9,012,748 _ 20,514,173 1984 5,995,965 90936,768 9,080,168 23,236,216 901 1985 6,808,814 11,8330437 10,209,064 25,012,31 1986 8,516,906 14,290028,851,315 1987 10,801,306 16,619,325 i9,i14,002 33,971,529 1988 12,192,485 18,284,791 21,491,410 46,834,633 1989 12,646,346 20,609,393 22,84S,1S4 51,974,752 1990 13,167,415 25,907,1SO 24,8141386 _ 56,100,893 63,889,551 i SOURCE: Denton Central Appraisal District i 1 e 1 frrSdr,+~ . i ~ Table 5 w CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT COLLECTIONS LAST TEN FISCAL _YEARS . Total 1 Delinquent Outstanding Current Current Ratio of Assessments Current and Fiscal Assessment Assessments Collections Collections Delinquent Year Due Collected to Amount Due Adjustments Assessments 1981 S - S - - $11,858 $145,389 1982 - - - 7,490 137,899 1983 - - - 500 1370399 1984 549,992 3070005 55.8% 5,137 375,249 r 1985 - - - 960020 279,229 1986 279,229 17 1987 - - - - 279,229 1988 - - - 90,711 1880518 ~ - I 1989 - 1,765 - - 186,753 89 1490 - - - 97,036 ,717 J -111- . 1 I a y '4 Sa i n CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS j RATIO OF NET GENERAL BONDED DEBT TO ASSESSED VALUE AND NET BONDED DEBT PER CAPITA LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS M Fiscal Assessed Value Gross Year Population in thousands Bonded Debt 1981 51,912 (2) $ 337,949 $150364,488 i 1982 53,527 (2) 663,437 (1) 14,247,000 r 1983 53,892 (2) 1,049,947 16,817,500 I- i 1984 54,413 (2) 1,127,587 15,552,750 1985 60,486 (2) 1,1540036 24,280,000 1986 64,365 (2) 1,443,543 23,7260730 e 1987 65,775 (2) 10820,464 270966,730 1988 67,000 (2) 20050,295 300231,730 1989 68,550 (2) 2,138,361 32,071,730 1990 69,284 (3) 2,139,002 32,111,730 i.~ (1) Assessed value increased due to an increase in assessed valuation from 60% to 100% of estimated actual value of taxable property (2) City of Denton Planning Department (Revised 1988), iI (3) U.S. Census estimate of 65,669 1s under dispute. 64 J~ "I u , Table 7 i 7 Pat i . f less Ratio of Net Net f Debt Bonded Debt Bonded ~a Service Net To Assessed Debt Per Funds Bonded Debt Value Capita 3 23,030 $15,341,458 4,54 $296 30,831 14,216,169 2.14 266 ° 34,049 160783,451 1.60 311 91,265 15,461,485 1.37 284 y 605,541 23,674,459 2.05 391 1,247,326 22,479,404 1.56 349 i 1,695,340 26,271,390 1.44 399 1,912,928 28,318,802 1.38 423 1,132,060 30,939,670 1.45 451 1 722,476 31,389,254 1,41 453 - J i J J ~ I E -113- i( 1 i Table 8 ' CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMPUTATION OF LEGAL DEBT MARGIN SEPTEMBER 30. 1990 Net Assessed Value $2,139,001,561 Plus Exempt Property Total 281,243.181 f Total Assessed Value $2.42D.211.742 r': Debt Limit - No debt limit is mandated }.;z by law but the City does recognize six percent as an economic limitation $ 145.214.684 F Amount of debt applicable to debt limit- C Total general obligation bonded debt $26,846,730 tM Certificates of obligation 4,995,000 Contractual obligation 270.000 320111,730 :I Less- Amount in debt service fund available for payment of principal 722.476 r r:. Total Amount of Debt Applicable to Debt Limit 31.389.251 r I Legal Debt Margin $ 11....~Q + I f r~ n IL i I L. -114- E A N Table 9 _ CITY OF DENIOM T 7fA5 CQHPUTATION OF DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING DEBT S PTENBER Q 1 Net Debt Percentage r s ictioJr Ou s a nd Applicable to the Amount { City of Denton'ng Citv of Penton (11 A1t11cC v cfb0e ien , 531,3849254 n Denton Independent 100, Ox :310899254 School District 40,500,000 Denton county 84,0 34,020,000 8,814,295 Total 21.4 (1) The 'Percentage Applicable to the City relative assessed values w y of Denton is based Rhin the City of Denton, on the j U I J J 1 ~ 000, Table 10 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS j i RATIO OF ANNUAL DEBT,SERYICE EXPENDITURES FOR r GENERAL BONDED DEBT TO TOTAL GENERAL EXPENDITURES (1) LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS r, Interest Ratio of and Debt Service Fiscal Fiscal Total Debt Total Expenditures ear Princloal_ Charges Service Exoenditures (oercentl 1981 $1,1110327 $ 842,220 $1,9591547 $126560,286 15.60% J 1982 101230750 759,237 1,8820987 13,735,639 13.71 + ` 1983 110410750 698,811 107460561 140889,992 11.73 1984 10264,750 11128,108 21392,858 1192670461 13.86 1985 104170385 10002,143 20419,528 20,782,071 11.64 I f 1986 135,438 21,708 1570146 (2) 20,61 MI 0.76 1 1987 860,000 20803,923 30663,923 2501780485 14.55 1988 2,1400773 20024,010 4,164,783 270747,257 15.01 1989 3,314,167 20194,464 565081631 32,6690813 16.86 1990 2,263,091 2,323,349 40586,440 32,690,508 14.03 i (1) Includes General, Special Revenue and Debt Service (2) Debt Service variance due to 1986 refunding of debt r 1 fiJ 1 -1I6- f i.. ~J 1 ~I I 1 ~ 1 r i n j f f f 1 V i 1 1 I 1~ M i i r I I- I f .'f . farai~ E 7 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i REVENUE BOND DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS 1. t' Direct Net Revenue Fiscal Operating Operating Available for Year Revenue Expenses (1) Debt Service Utility System 1981 1;30,667,378 $25,084,412 >i 50S821966 1982 371568,915 30,729,685 6,8391230 1983 41,376,356 33,2369669 891391687 1984 55,639,035 39,765,633 15,873,402 L 1985 67,541,640 52,104,589 1S,437,OS1 1986 73,507,978 58,911,014 14,596,964 1987 73,1200971 59,829,407 13,291,564 1988 73,383,556 61,203,158 12,180,398 1989 77,365,137 60,247,323 17,117414 1990 78,1240599 5605690160 21,55S,439 i i L (1) Excluding Depreciation, r, -}18- _i , F Table 11 fi r I~ T Debt Service Reoulrements PrinclDal Interest Total Coverage F $1,314,503 $1,531,75S $2,846,258 1.96 1,298,459 115429153 208400612 2.41 10540,000 10073,531 2,6130531 3.11 200600000 2,336,712 40396,712 3.61 ` I~ 1,735,000 30900,606 50635,b06 2.74 f 210458000 3,880,181 5,925,181 2.46 i 20020,000 3,462,539 5,482,539 2.42 20115,000 3,338,428 S,453,428 2.23 2,250,000 3,388,Bi7 5,638,817 3.04 2,430,000 3,2610456 5,691,456 3.79 j t I~ ~ Ik y Ip 1 I~ II {I! I # i -119- t CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS - f ~ PROPERTY VALUE, CONSTRUCTION AND BANK DEPOSITS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Commercial gonstruction (1) ` r Fiscal Property Value Number Value Year (in thousands) of ~f 1981 563,248 202 $27,5730759 1982 6630437 210 11,8460452 r i 1983 10049,946 221 74,777,113 i 1984 1,121,587 291 81,264,078 r 1965 1,1540036 545 8807680781 1986 1,4430543 450 41,4520104 1987 10820,464 227 46,619,495 1988 2,050,295 113 21,927,481 1969 2,138,361 ISO 31,315,513 1990 2,137,002 134 6,4279910 ,I i' (1) City of Denton Planning and Development Department Estimate ' t (2) City of Denton Chamber of Commerce Estimate i -120- L 1 1 ~ 9 1 Table 12 1 Residential Construction (1) f Number Bank 2) fl { of olosiits Units Value (in thousands) 342 5120963,987 $254,561 683 26,214,973 289,979 233 26,3869660 368,005 564 49,273,898 385,000 1 618 490995,190 4759179 673 54,972,728 561,819 457 33,4179130 457,504 304 24,577,039 448,058 u 258 21,2410087 6420485 1 316 20,249,571 714,892 -121- u i I r .1~ C -122- r I ~ • Table 13 1 i i 1 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS PRINCIPAL TAXPAYERS SEPTEMBER 30. 1990 Percentage ' J of Total Taxable Taxable? Assessed Assessed Name of Taxpayer Kind of Property Valuation * Valuation Peterbilt/Paccar Diesel Trucks S 460733,049 1.97% General Telephone Telephone Utility 41,862,080 1.76% Tetra Pak Packing Manufacturing 38,430,379 1,62% Texas Instruments Electronic Manufacturing 24,641,294 1.25% E Andrew Corporation Electronic Equipment 21,4651644 0.90% Victor Equipment Company Welding Equipment 21,384,973 0.90% { Notami/Lifemark/ Hospital 6 Professional AMI North Texas Building 2002690143 0.85% Acme Brick Brick Manufacturing 16,6150727 0.70% Denton Center Joint Venture Shopping Center 14,267,316 0.60% Golden Triangle Mail Shopping Mall 13,944.576 O,i9% TOTAL llai .dl," ILU% I r' a Source: Denton Central Appraisal District reported property value, 1989. 1 It irk li F ~ • i -123- 1 {us 1 ~ 0 ' CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS SCHEDULE OF INSURANCE IN FORCE SEPTEMBER 30. 1990 _ The City of Denton is largely self-insured. This includes but is not limited to the first $50,000 of each property loss and $250,000 of each workers' 6 compensation loss. However, liability policies are purchased for airport, paramedic/EMT, recreation program, diesel fuel, and employee dishonesty exposures. Losses that are not retained by the City are covered by various insurance companies including: r I ' L (E EXPIRATION INSURANCE COMPANY PREMIUM POLICY NO, DATE 1. Arkwright Boston $ 47,014 390695 10-01-91 2. Arkwright Boston 1060801 290609 10-01-91 3. U.S.A.I.G. 40000 ALO1459 10-01-91 (Frank e. Hall and Co.) 4. Texas Political Subdivision 9 of Paid HO 165 10-01-91 (Employer's Casualty Co.) Loss/Contri- bution w 5. Western Heritage Insurance Co. 10814 CLP0107436 07-19-91 6. Western World Insuran:e Co. 6,773 GLA318087 01-31-91 t' 7. Employers National Insurance Co. 12,661 CEF-8-3410967 10-01-91 I ' 8. Appalachian Insurance Co. 250 YA242 11-01-91 9. Western Heritage Insurance Co. 3,795 ARPM-773-915-7670 10-01-91 10. Western Heritage Insurance Co. 1,615 CLP-0107461 09-07-91 fr 11. Trinity Universal Insurance Co. 266 6L 74690440005 11-21-90 fl, -124- t 4 i~ Table 14 1 1 1 - AMOUNT OR ' COVERAGE LIMIT 1. Boiler and Machinery 73,690,000 is 2. All Risk Coverage 57,672,000 G~ 3. Airport and Manger Keepers Liability 50000,000 j 4. Workmen's Compensation 109000,000 i S. Recreation After School Program - MLK 10000,000 6. Ambulance-Professional Liability 5000000 7. Equipment ($10,000 Deductible) 106009000 S. Transportation 1010000 ti ' 9. Recreation Center - Medical 10,000 10. Recreation After School Program - Denia 100000000 ~l 11. Liability - Senior Citizens Domino Club 100000000 f~ 1 kl -125- i i I 1 SN, TEXAS CITY-OF-DENT DEMOGRAPHIC STATISTICS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Fiscal Per Capita Median GJ Age 01 e (11 Year Population 01 incom 1981 51,912 $7,394 25.1' 1982 53,527 10500 25.3 11r , 1983 53,892 7,800 25.5 6. 1984 540413 80040 25,8 1985 60,486 8,615 29.2 64,365 91746 27.4 1986 1987 650775 90750 27.5 6710)0 9,750 27.5 C { 1988 1989 680550 90750 28.2 1990 69,284 * 91150 28.2 L r.~ (1) Planning and Community Development Department's Estimate (2) Denton Independent School District Estimate f (3) Texas Employment Commission Estimate * U. S. Census estimate of 650669 is under dispute. III` Estimate as of October 1990 -126- ~ Table 15 1 V I i Education - Level In unemployment school Public School C,..' Enrollment (21 Rate (3) Year 1 I 8,200 4.3% 15.5 15.8 8,365 5,8 6.8 15.8 8,481 3.6 15.8 8,914 9,518 7.5 i-A 15.8 15.8 90919 8.2 15.8 91899 8.4 10,180 6.2 15.8 15.8 100275 1.S 10,696 5.4 15.8 I t 1 ~i -127- I I 1 I ~a li Table 16 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS pi MISCELLANEOUS STATISTICAL DATA SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 j i ~ I ~ Form of Government Council-Manager G Area 61,0 square miles Date of Incorporation September 26, 1866 r Miles of Streets 300 Number of Street lights 4,471 Fire Protection: Number of stations 4 Number of firemen and officers (exclusive of volunteer firemen) 92 Police Protection: Number of stations 1 ` Number of policemen and officers 109 Municipal Electric Department: - .i Number of customers 260978 = Annual Electric production 798,1500000 KWH - Average Monthly Consumption 63,523,735 KWH Mites of electric line 381.5 miles f Municipal Water Department: Number of customers 17,609 Annual Water production 4,456,315,000 gallons Average Monthly Consumption 371,360,000 gallons Miles of water main 325 miles Municipal Wastewater Department: Number of customers 160305 Miles of sanitary sewer 321 miles Annual Wastewater Discharge 3,461,104,000 gallons/year Building Permits Issued 450 Recreation and Culture: Number of parks 16 with 542 acres Number of libraries 1 Items in circulation 134,967 l Employees (All funds): Exempt 161 Nonexempt Total W 1 LI -128- i ..J