Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-30-1991 Own, bLL AGENDA if CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL April 30, 1991 work session of the City of Denton City council on Tuesday, April 300 1991, at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Boom of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: 5:15 pim. ` 1. Executive session: A. Legal Matters - Under sec. 2(e). Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Consider action in }~odso_n!Cx Cry. B. Real Estate Under Sec, 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel /Board Appointments Under See. '2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. a ~f 1. Consider appointments to the Suildtng.'Code. Board, Community Development lllock'' Brant Committee, the Electrical Code Board,"0.ihe Historic Landmark Commission, the 'HuAAh 4. Services Committee, the Downtown ildviloty'-, Board and the Sign Board of Appeals. 2. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding a a proposed sprinkler ordinance. 3. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding; a proposed ordinance designating the City of Denton as exclusive provider of commercial solid waste services in the City of Denton. q, Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding City redistricting and give staff direction. an J Special Called Meeting of the City of in Denton the Cout cilouncil Chambers Tuesday. April 30, 1991, at 7:00 Pon, Of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the, following items will be considered: 7100 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance { -1 fi r i City of Denton City Council Agenda i April 30, 1991 Page 2 2. Public Hearings A. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an f ordinance amending sections 5-3 and 5-5 of i Article I of Chapter 5 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas (Buildings) to provide for amendments to the Uniform Building { Code; requiring that automatic sprinkler systems be Installed in certain buildings; amending + Article 4.07(x) of Appendix A of the Code of i Ordinances to provide for reduction in the tire it protection vater capacity requirements in certain circumstances; providing exemptions from certain requirements of the Uniform Building Cod}}.`:'in Group A, Division 3 and 4, Group B and Gr6up"8 occupancies where such buildings are equipped f with automatic sprinkler systems: repealing all ordinances In conflict herewith; providing tot a maximum penalty in the amount of 12,000 therefox for violations of sections 1, Ili of IV;, providing a maximum penalty in the amount of 1540 for violations of section II thereof. B. Hold a public hearinq and consider adoption of as a. ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas amending Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances to provide that the City of Denton shall be the exclusive provider of commercial solid waste services within the city; providing for an exception for special waste haulers with a permit; providing for an exception for recyclable refuse haulers by registration. 3. Ordinances A. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement between the City of Denton and Corgan Associates Architects relating to professional services to evaluate the City's space needs and develop a long range waster plan for City facilities. 4. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. 5. Official Action on Executive session Itemos A. V qal Matters B. Rasl Estate C. Personnel s D. Board Appointments i i r777 City of Denton City Council Agenda April 30, 1991 Page 3 6. New Business: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. j 7. Executive Session: +r• A. Legal Matters Under goo. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. , d B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Act. 6252-17' 's VATS y' C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(q) Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C E R T I! I C A T S I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the` bulletin board at the City Ball of the City of Denton, Tokan on the - day of 1991 at o0clrook (P.R.)5 r, 1 9 CITY SECRETARY ! 3376C mss, . 1v1 Y ; V" ,l y V4M1 r . r r • r r , yr' r + is ;r, ~ 1 1 ~a CITYo(DENTQMrUX" MUNICIPAL BUILDING / OEN TON, TEXAS 1820f /TELEPHONE (8 17) 000.030, ! Office of the C{sy Manaper " ~M1 r l M E M O R A N D V M ITp; The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ck~ r,. FRON: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager G DATE: April 26, 1991 ` V t , F fi,~Y r: SUBJECT: Sprinkler Ordinance >r r Attached you will find the final draft ordinance and some back technical details of .,A up material from Chief Cook explaining t F ! ~~F the final compromises in the ordinance. ' I am pleased to tell you that this Wednesday the "Mayor's Committee" met at 4:00 p.m. and we discussed the ordinance. y+< That committee which includes Chuck Carpenter, Barbara Russell. k.r;+ lV er~ Jerry Cott, Russell Sates, David Biles, Fred Pole and Wayne j Allen, concluded that the ordinance was satisfactory to them. They did advise that there was still concern about residential„ uses and in fact they felt that these items ought to be discussed with a residential subcommittee and worked out. t staff agreed and we committed to do that. Also included is _a statement from the Chamber indicating their support for the I draft ordinance with the exception of single family houses. 1 have also included copies of minutes from the building code board in April where they reviewed the ordinance and made a r motion on April 19th to approve the draft ordinance with the exception of one and two family houses. Yesterday morning, Chief Cook, Bob Haqemann, Jackie Doyle and 3r, myself not with Mr. Fred Gossett, Mrs. Barbara Russell, Mr, Ed Owens. Mr. Dave Boston and Mr. Bob Benedict who represented a ' residential subcommittee. Through their cooperation and with their help we were able to hammer out a compromise which is also included in this draft ordinance. Those are the two exceptions in section 9802 (b) (2) Exceptions which gives L specific exemptions for residential, i.e. it certain fire rated ' walls are built to separate "non-conditioned space" in single family homes, up to 5,000 sq. ft. could be built without being epcinklered Iii. tl I; it I . r, it Y ti 4, 1 ✓ d {H I i Sprinkler Ordinance April 26. 1991 Page Two similarly. two family and multi-family structures of over 5,000 j; sq. ft, could be built as long as the 5,000 sq. Lt, increments were separated by 4 hr. fire walls. We left that meeting h agreeing that if wording to this effect is included in the ordinance, this group of people could also support the ordinance. We made a commitment to distribute this draft ordinance to each of those groups as soon as the City Attorney's office had completed their work. We have done that today, l 07 A , As you can see from some of the backup information, this has been a very long process, but I think a very beneficial one to the City of Denton. I think this ordinance goes a long way x toward helping us with a multi-pronged approach to addressing the needs of fire protection for the City of Denton. As you all know, we've made major changes in our prevention activities ,y including public education, private business and industry s ' involvement through committee support for educational materials and more awareness, We've made major changes to our inspection ray process to make it more acceptable (by not charging for the first inspections which are done semi-annually) so that we can be such more proactive in pointing out hazards and potential problems. Chief Cook has made major changes to out operating procedure and how we respond with manpower and equipment to fires. over the last several years, the Council has made major t expenditures for equipment needs in the fire department, All of these changes as well as the sprinkler ordinance will help us with better ways to protect our citizens at the lowest possible cost. This effort has helped to educate a broad section of the city's leaders to the problems of fire J , protection and the needs of the fire department. I believe this will be very beneficial to the city in the future, I would like to take this opportunity to thank all of the people mentioned above for their tireless effort and relentless pursuit of "common groundr They were essential to the process and are the reason that we are able to bring you this document, Staff believes that it is a fair document, a comprehensive one and one that will help us to continue to provide the best service in these very trying timer. A spacial thanks should also go to the Mayor who played a major role in bringing both sides back together at a very crucial juncture last fall. I don't think we would have this ordinance without` his leadership and guidance in the process. ! d 1 IP , , , v+ b MLI age r ..pr•1MIY4YrIA',1L.'i~1140iJ"M"YYh,«yp.u~. .n.rw~. w. rv 1 _ .a b~roN d'R'i1 1F'"~IH 4!b~" Ir."NM'\!5 l 55 `4 . 3r t 1 8 2 4 Sprinkler Ordinance ;tR'0 la April 26, 1991 Page Three a 0' A ' I J , ly5 1 believe that John has mentioned the major points in the ordinance in the backup for this meeting 'end previous meetings. We would be happy to discuss any of those with you G at your leisure, We feel that the ordinance will help us ;yr immensely and would recommend it to you. If you haVe further r Questions, please feel free to call us at your convenience, N', ,d' 1 ~ t Ibv l~ I ti 1 S I ~ 'ny, `5 t Ric Sveh Deputy City manager :E t 'r AP 1 4' i 1 1 } I r d r n y 41 n, t 3~if' ? tilt plJ 1, !'1 L+,I +rpIS +C~J r5 t< ~ + t p ~ 4 5~' I r p 1 w f. .,t p r l 0 S a K M1 t. ~ +Y 1 ~k i i7J V~ tr r~5 + P l~ L ,~r 1 0! w ~ .I ' ' 4131~~' f 4 r i I~ ' r~~1. 44 i M . J ~ V r 1 l ge r 41 Fo Y I qt ~^~e~. r 1. ' ~ !r V'4 y~ X 1. 01 3~ M 1 fit'. i b 1 'r r G '`t ray' p~ r T4 r I 4 f A+Ih f Y n 'iJ rla. ; tJ~ 't l ~t ' IN t ~ Wt } . ' { J~f jr, 1•+' It'M'' ~ 7 ~ ' I r 4' Y' L 5 ( ~ I nayy/.+. k, ,~yy~ ~ ~•{`Q%~ y Fji 1 1 'I~ A . . 1 I 5`t ~ C ir~ A y~(( y _ ~.vwWIV+Ir y♦ 41. w♦r r i .,,+r.~+ywrWMn+.Yru...-...-_ --e..ww..ee.......~ ...anwM[fF'yil~1' "~f~vNwwa.n '~'r ' ~ ' i 1A ¢y~ F" it w r A ' 0 7 ' ! r S L. C llf I v' all 1 A ass ~ 1 1 MEMO 091-028 T0: Mr. R. Svehla, Deputy City Manager FROM; J. L. Cook, Jr., Fire Chief Ik/ DATE: 5 April, 1991 RE: Proposed Automatic Fire Sprinkler Ordinance During the four years that I have served as Fire Chief for the City of Denton, I have been laboring to upgrade our equipment and personnel. During the decade from 1980 to 1990, the City experienced substantial growth in both population and land area. The demand for Fire and EMS services also ; experienced a substantial Increase. However, the number of personnel employed by the Department has not increased since 1980. This has resulted ' In a deficiency of approximately 33 percent in fire suppression personnel. Ac- r~ cording to ISO standards, we need to employ an additional 40 fire fighters. Realizing the prohibitive costs of such a move in light of our current F. economic conditions, the staff of the Department examined a number of alter- natives to the traditional methodology of service delivery. Approximately 75 . percent of our service demand is for EMS. An additional twenty percent of our demand Is for fire incidents which normally only require a single engine company. The remaining five percent of our calls are for structural fires 1 5 which require the response of several fire companies. Unfortunately, it to° this five percent which accounts for 99 percent of our fire loss and presents us with our greatest challenge. , Upon closer examination of our structures, it was revealed that 92.4 per 1 ' cent of our 31,396 are residential in character. Only 7.6 percent is non- residential. Our first alarm assignment of fourteen fire fighters can effec- tively deliver 500 gpm which is adequate for most one and two-family dwell- ings. Our problem Is with structures of combustible construction of greater ! 1 than 5,000 square feet and noncombustible construction of greater than 10,000 square feet. A 10,000 square foot building of noncombustible construction without sprinklers requires a fire flow of 2,700 gpm. A fire in a building of this size would require a minimum of 33 fire fighters on hosellnes plus addi- tional support personnel. A sprinkler system would decrease the required fire flow demand by 50%. To flow 1,350 gpm would only require 16 personnel on hosellnes, plus additional support personnel 'therefore, we presented an alternative which would allow us to increase on-duty manning to addrers our normal levels of medical calls and would allow s us to cope with two simultaneous single-family dwelling fires. This would re- quire an additional 17 personnel, rather than 40 required by NO standards, it To compensate for the difference, we proposed the enactment of a mandatory sprinkler ordinance. This would require that the person creating a hazard i that was beyond our capability would be required to mitigate the hazard. The 1 senior management staff of the city concurred with the proposal, as did the Council upon initial hearing. We were Instructed to proceed with the prepare- a . tion of an automatic fire sprinkler ordinance. Figure One, below contains an incomplete chronology of the procaas that has brought us to this point in time, f,P owl Figure 1 Chronology of Events Relating to the Sprinkler Ordinance Date: Event: 1 Feb., 1987 John Lee Cook, Jr. becomes Fire Chief 1 Mar., 1987 Denton Record-Ch tonic le publishes article by Jack Delaporte expressing opposition to residential t fire sprinklers and my letter to the editor sho: tly + i ! thereafter. This results In an invitation to Apo ik to the home builderss etc. about sprinklers. l 3 June, 1987 DFD Five Year Plan forwarded to R. Svehla outlining needs for fire stations, new apparatus, apparatus re placements, and proposed code changes. 18 Dec., 1987 Staffing study submitted to R. Svehla outlining manpower requirements and reduced fire flown due to sprinkler } Installation. 15 August, 1988 Original ordinance completed by Legal Department, this is followed by a aeries of meetings discussing various issues which met with opposition such as retro-fitting high-rise buildings, etc, ems, 3 March, 1989 Request sent to Legal to make agreed upon changes in ` the proposed Ordinance. 3 17 Hay, 1989 Legal Reviews proposed supplemental rules. , 25 August, 1989 Legal responds to a request of 5 July, 1989 for a ` Fire Code Appeal Board. a 15 Nov., 1989 Met with seven members of Governmental Relations Committee of the Chamber. t" j 22 Nov., 1989 Responded to Chamber incorporating several of the proposed changes from the 15 Nov., 1989 meeting. 18 Jan., 1990 Responded to additional changes requested by the Chamber, Memo e90-0C. 16 Feb., 1990 Met with 19 members of the Governmental Relations Committee of the Chamber. 16 Feb., 1990 Met with six Directors and Executive Directors k : concerning impact of proposed ordinance of City owned buildings, e.g. Libraries. , 2 °J l } x ~ n t K i n i , .J n~. V- 29 May, 1990 Received list of questions and comments from a Task Force Committee from the Governmental Relations Committee of the Chamber. 13 June, 1990 Memo 090-32 reflected changes in ordinance and the work of L. Allison and Dave Hamm in resolving Issues concerning fire flow and infrastructure. 'U 23 August, 1990 Met with the Building Code Board. 5 Sept. 1990 Responded to Chamber's Letter of 6 August, 1990 and t attempted to address their concerns. 1 Oct., 1990 Met with Chamber Committee, the City Manager responded A ti" to their concerns on 5 Oct., 1990 and again on 22 Oct. 30 Oct., 1990 Memo #90-72 responded to Chamber's proposed substitutions in ordinance. 20 Nov., 1990 Letter from J. Cott expresses Chamber's opposition to ordinance as written. + , 30 Nov., 1990 The Mayor intervenes and suggests meeting for 6 Dec. 6 Dec., 1990 The Mayor hosts meeting to discuss issues. ; 14 Dec., 1990 L. Harrell summarizes information questions, the i r •,i philosophical questions, and the code questions raised by the meeting of 6 Dec, do staff prepares 1 a position paper on same, t ~ 15 Jan., 1991 Meeting held in response to position paper, moderated E ; by the Mayor. 25 Jan., 1991 Met again and began to make progress with additional ,P subcommittee meetings on 31 Jan, and 7 Feb., 1991 In y which the final draft was developed with the proposed trade-offs; draft was sent to subcommittee on 19 Feb.; i4< to Legal on 22 March, with suggested wording changes by J, Doyle. 21 March, 1991 Building Code Board Reviewed Ordinance with some minor corrections suggested. We also adopted a philosophy which incorporates ' a belief that the current standards within the fire service Industry are inappropriate and too expensive for the City of Denton to meet. For example, traditional ladder trucks are now costing over 1/2 reillion dollars a year. According to the traditional stan- dards, we would need two ladder trucks, One million dollars would buy slot , of sprinklers. We believe that the money would be bettRr spent on sprinklers, I~ 1 s 3 r. i i r }t' 1 u + t a, 'Owl , Several recent fires within the community have proven the value of automatic fire sprinklers. We believe that sprinklers are the most effective form of lire protection. Sprinklers are 96% effective in containing or extin- guishing fires and they also save lives. When combined with well trained fire fighters and a sound program of lire prevention and Fublic education, the lire losses will be held in check and the taxpayer will receive the biggest bang { for his buck. In the absence of fire sprinklers and effective education and enforcement, there is no guarantee that the department would be more effi- clent or effective In its fire suppression efforts simply because it employed { ? the 30 additional personnel. Our program is a balanced one that has Included substantive input by city staff members and participants from the Chamber. Special recognition and thanks Is due to Jerry Cott, Russell Bates, Wayne " Allen, Barbara Russell, David Biles, Fred Gossett, and Chuck Carpenter of the " 1 Chamber. Special thanks to the following personnel from the City: Mayor Castleberry, Lloyd Harreli, Frank Robbins, Rick Svehla, Jackie Doyle, Debra Drayovitch, Betty McKean, and Bob Nagemann. I appreciate your patience and cooperation In this matter and regain available to answer any questions that you eight have. KEY POINTS OF THE PROPOSED AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER ORDINANCE POINTS OF THE PROPOSED AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER ORDINANCE* 1 t Sprinklers would be required in all new buildings If: y ,y They are of combustible construction and exceeded 5,000 square feet of floor area * They are of noncombustible construction and ex- ceeded 10,000 square feet a,. s In all new basements regardless of size, construction t? type, or occupancy, except single-family dwellings s In all new Group I (institutional) occupancies t Group H occupancies would not change from current UBC requirements Sprinklers would be required in all existing buildings it: t the additions caused the building to exceed 10,000 square k feet and the additions were more than 25% of the building's original size on the date the ordinance passed: For example: A building that was originally 8,000 sq. fta could enlarge to 9,999 sq. ft. or 50% and not ; be sprinklered. A building that was originally 10,000 would be required to sprinkler If it was enlarged ' to more than 12,500 sq. ft, I ` 1',! 1 ~ ar v 1ri # Art. 407 (a) of the Subdivision Ordinance establishes fire flow requirements. The sprinkler ordinance would allow for fire flow reductions if buildings are equipped with sprinklers provided that a minimum of 600 gpm is provided. This was a major concern of the a Chamber. # In order to provide economic incentives to builders, the following. trade-offs are allowed in Group A, Divisions 3 & 4, Group B, and Group a` R occupancies when a building is sprinklered: f' # One hour fire-rated corridor construction is waived # Smoke and draft controls in corridors are eliminated # HVAC fire dampers in HVAC ducts in corridors are elminated, ` • \ # Wire glass in corridors is eliminated J • # Flame spread rating in walla and ceilings is ,y r increased to Class III # Exterior walls not lees than 10 feet from property lines may be of unprotected construction I Fire lanes are modified to within 50 feet of a the FD connection r J i } {,IY i~iY l r4 5 hp., J. i 7YV, VIA n J 1 ~I till i I k1s 1 Y Y i ~~'I f Y r r 7 9 r r fir 1 1 MEMO #91-031 T01 Mr. R. Svehla, Deputy City Manager PROMt J. L. Cook, Jr., Fire Chief A s DATEI 26 April, 1991 i AEI FINAL DRAFT - AOTOXhTV, PIRG 6PRINRLLR ORDINANCE Since the last briefing with the City Council on the proposed automatic fire sprinkler ordinance, we have met with representatives of the Chamber of Commerce to finalize, the ordinance. Both the Building Code Board and the Chamber have indicated their support of the ordinance with a slight modification ll in residential structures, FF On Thursday mornings 25 April the City staff met with a contingent I ,r of home and apartment builders. We resolved our impasse by k allowing the use of 4-hr fire walls in multi-family structures in- lieu of sprinkler. In single family, we settled on separating out °j.` non-heated or air-conditioned space by a one-hour separation. If .a .`r',_;' the space heated or cooled exceeds 51000 square feet sprinklers -~q' 0" will be required. ; We are now optimistic that we have solved as many problems as ~ possible and have brought an ordinance to the council that the majority can support. The Chamber, the Home Builders and Apartment Builders, and Jackie Doyle have really done an outstanding job in ra ' ` arriving at a consensus pk Certainly, both you and the Mayor deserve a special thank you. Without your combined leadership, we would not have resolved our differences. qtr,. , •5 JLC/ec , q~ k rl 2i. f tE a U; Y J1'S f fC'~YM f. f ~ I . i t "u W"i , POSITION STATEMENT or of Commerce r I Denton Chamb In regard to the proposed AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER ORDINANCE R 1 x i the Board of Directors of the Denized CUNIFFOeRM SVILDINC rCODE in { satisfied with the nationally recogn its present form s' Council, in its judgement, dooms that it is in the } if the City best interest of all citizens of Denton to amend this ordinance, with regard to both existing and future Commercial Buildings, we ■ta!! to the City accept the proposed draft with t council on April 5, 1991 with t'a exception of Section~llings), r of R-3 (Single Family . pertaining to spinkiinq r' regardless of size. Approved April 16, 1991 jj 11 4fy4 i ` '14 X41 "~1' M 4 r. ~ r ' 16". ,5 c i rl,; 11 f X14 ~ ~ 1 r f 4: ~ 1 4 In Yv~~~ ~ 1 ~ 41 Q•• • ~ C'A. 1 p 1 1 y ,1 l S Y + , r n : rL' +~v4',c;4'sMdf(t1Y9tai~a~~ ---~T r7 Nnr I if F f i i f I i MINUTES Building Code Board April 15, 1991 Present: wa ne Allen, Ed Owens, Cliff Reding, Jackie Doyle, Building Official, Robert Hagemann, Fire Marshal Absent: Greg Muirhead, Isabel Miller t, i, Reding moved and Owens seconded a motion to approve the minutes of March 211 1991, as written. Motion carried unanimously. Ii. Doyle provided a brief review of the proposed sprinkler 1 ordinance after which Owens introduced Mr. Fred Gossett, a local builder and businessman. Mr. Gosso eaott talked to the Board about the history of the proposed ordinance, Gossett b, said that the original document did not include a , requirement that residential occupancies. be sprinkled Gossett was concerned that a house with 31500 squarefeat,oi air-conditioned floor area might have to be sprinkled .if non-conditioned areas such as garages were thatlitewouldfeb r ~ area calculations, Mr. Gossett indicated about $1.25 per square foot to sprinkler a house, Ha asked if there was another city in this area that required single-family homes to be sprinkled. Why should-Denton-have such a requirement? Owens said that he had not recognized thliedrt ucommeroiin the ordinance and assumed that it only app construction. Allen explained that Chief Cook had indicated that he did not have the men or equipment to fight a fire effectively in c a building of combustible construction of 5,000 square feet. of floor area, no a mhadusaidrthatd that Wi with residential constiuction Mr. Do with Chief Coo k, Cook would not be covered. in the proposed ordina~ciey no ono~7t asked if Cook could fight fire three years agog Mr Association Hof hGreater Executive Presidet nand hstated tthat lose than one percent of fire deaths occurred in homes under ten years years old, n 00449 is I, i' r MINUTES Building Code Board April 15, 1991 Page Two i Allen related some of the history of the proposed ordinance and told Board members of the City Manager's desire to have such an ordinance and that the City Council would probably { review and take action on the proposed ordinance before the end of the month. y Mr. High said that he felt Chief cook had gone back on his t _ word. Gossett said that he wants the ordinance not to a" include single-family construction as originally agreed ; Allen suggested that those concerned about the proposed ordinance should go and talk to Chief Cook, Allen said that he did not have a problem with sprinkling apartment buildings. Gossett said that he did not think the home and { apartment builders group objected. Allen asked why require commercial buildings to be sprinkled if single-family buildings are not? Owens replied thaE commercial buildings are public occupancies. (Gossett said i y. that businesses produce a cash flow and homes do not. 4 Reding moved that the Board recommend approval of the ordinance provided one and two-family dwellings are exaMpt j , from the ordinance. Owens seconded the motion. y Allen requested that the Board not make a recommendation ( r until he could review the ordinance further. Reding withdrew his motion. The Board agreed to meet again at noon on Thursday, April 18th, and to request that Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, John Cook, F re Chief, and I Stank Robbins, Executive Director of Planning and Development attend the meeting. III. Redding asked questions concerning the building Code Board i being the appeals board for signs. Be was also in favor of i I the proposed Sign Board. Meeting adjourned at 5:10 P.M. i : d4 rf 1 0044S i R./ 13 r~ i . MINUTES Building Code Board April 19, 1991 j Present: Wayne Allen, Cliff Reding, Ed Owens, Isabel Miller, Staff Present: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, Frank Robbins, I Executive Director of Planning and Development, Jackie Doyle, Building Official, Robert Hagemann, i' ' Fire Marshal Absent: Greg Muirhead ' 1. Allen asked if the reason for the proposed fire sprinkler ordinance was to keep from raising taxes in order to hire ' more firemen. Svehla said that was basically correct. He ^4: said that a way needed to be found to make the number of existing men and equipment sufficient to the job. Therefore, the proposed-ordinance was written. Svehla said that eventually new firemen would have to hired. He, said that the new fire station number 5 was staffed by reassigning existing men and equipment. He said proposed fire station number 6 would require more men, Svehla said that in a structure fire, the Fire Department first searches for people in the building and then fights the fire. He said that with the staff on duty at any one time, they can ` not effectively fight a fire in a building of combustible construction if it has more than 2,500 square feet of floor r. area. Allen asked Mr, Manuel High, Executive Vice President of the j ` Apartment Association of Greater Dallas, if he wanted to say anything about any problems he saw with the proposed ordinance. Mr, High expressed concerns regarding cost,, reliability and the need for sprinkler systems in single-family dwellings. He said single-family buildings do not cause problems, He said that water damage may be more hazardous than fire. A' Allen said that previous drafts did not inolude single-family, and now it does. Allen said he thought the proposed ordinance was excellent for commercial buildings, but not for residential. Miller asked why someone thought single-family dwellings should be included, Allen answered that 2,500 square toot combustible building was as large as the Fire Department' j could effectively fight. Questions were asked regarding i whether a 5,000 square foot residential fire was easier or harder to fight than a comparable size commercial building fire and how does a residential fire differ from a commercial fire in similar size buildings, 00149' k I . b~ t i a Building Code Board April 19, 1991 Page Two Svehla mentioned compromises and deletions the City has made i during negotiations with representatives from the Chamber of Commerce since the original draft was written. He said that when the 5,000 square feet was agreed on, the staff assumed residential was included. The chamber representatives apparently did not recognize or know staff's interpretation, and nothing was said by the chamber group. Svehla said that staff feels that residential fires are as hard to fight as comparable size commercial fires. Svehla said that a 'problem had been expressed concerning the method of t ' calculating square footage in a dwelling and that staff would be willing to limit calculations only to the areas :S{ inside the walls and exclude porches, patios and carports, Mr. High said that a year to a year and a half ago, Chief Cook met with the chamber group and said emphatically that "r residential would not be included. Svehla agreed that at ti the time, that was staff's opinion, but during other meetings, it changed. Allen said that he had met with Chief Cook since the' Board's meeting on the 15th and asked the chief what it would take` to remove residential from the ordinance. Allen indicated that Chief Cook was not in favor of omitting reaidential because a fire is a fire regardless of the occupancy; Allen' said the chief would want something back if It were done, Allen said he did not know what it would be# but it should not come from the commercial section of the proposed ordinance. Reding asked if any other city in the area required Y' residences to be sprinkled. Robbins said that Plano requires buildings over 70000 square feet to be sprinkled. Fire Marshal Hagemann referred to Cobb County,' Georgia arid, -Scottsdale, Arizona as two places which require homes to be sprinkled, Allen moved to recommend approval of the proposed sprinkler I, ordinance with the exception of one and two-family dwellings which were not originally included and has not been adequately discussed. Allen said he would agree to include one and two-family if a compromise can be reached with those f: builders, r., Svehla asked if the Board would wait a week or- two before j, making their recommendation and see if a compromise can be reached in order that the Board can make a recommendation without conditions, Owens thought that the private sector also had concerns in addition to the builders. , 00445 'cR l _ XTj{ i~ r7 7_1 y~ I M MINUTES `r Building Code Board Page Three 1 Reding said that government is constantly throwing stuff r down our throats, and he thought home owners should have the option of sprinkling or not sprinkling. Hagemann said that : sprinkler systems get a black eye when they really should not. He said sprinkler systems do not go off when there is no fire. He said, there are more problems with domestic water than with water in sprinkler systems, Miller said she was tired of Texans being pulled into the 20th century kicking and screaming. She said, 5#000 square feet of combustible construction is 5,000 square feet whether it is residential or commercial. She said she sees no reason to exempt residential. Allen moved and Reding seconded a motion that the Board recommends that the proposed automatic fire sprinkler ordinance be adopted with the exception that one and two-family structures not be included, The Board also, 141 recommends that Section 10-62B(2) concerning combustible; construction of over 5,000 square feet be reviewed further; regarding the requirement that one and two-family structures: be sprinkled, Allen, Owens and Reding voted in favor of the 3r motion. Miller voted no. Motion carried 3 to 1, lie The Board discussed the possibility that the Building Code Board be the appeala board for anything hapFening inside ' > property lines. Landscaping, signs and parking lots were discussed. Robbins said that the Planning and Zoning 2 Commission studied the landscape and sign ordinances, and it was felt that they were the appropriate group to review g appeals and variances. Robbins felt that requiring someone; to appear before the Planning and Zoning Commission and then , .J the Building Code Board was not streamlining the process, fff Robbins suggested that the Building Code Board meet with the other boards to see if they agree or disagree with what the Building Code Board thinks should be done. Robbins also suggested that Allen meet with him about getting on the Planning and Zoning Commission agenda, f iii, There was no new business. Meeting adjourned at lt50 p.m. 4. 00443 F I ` DATE: April 30, 1991 ; „3 1 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Coimc£l FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager i SMECT: ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING M CITY OF DENTON AS THE SOLE PROVIDER OF , CMERCIAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICE IN THE CITY OF DENT(>n RECO44MTION: -I The staff's past recommendation, which is still financially sound, is that a, if the commercial system is not sold, then the best action for the City, financially, is for an exclusive franchise to be granted to the City of Denton for all solid waste collection and disposal in Denton. 9144ARY: Based upon the City Council request of April 16, 1991, staff has developed an ordinance which establishes the City of Denton as the sole provider of rr commercial solid waste collection service within the City of Denton.`. This ordinance does make allowances and provides for the regulation of pprivate' firms providin services related to the collection of recyclables, hazard- ous waste, infectious waste and other special waste at the discretion of the City. In order to become the sole provider of commercial solid waste services by January 1, 1992, the Cit : ry , , y will have to take. steps to acquire additional equipment, vehicles and personnel. While a specific listing for the t< equipment and manpower needs appears in Exhibit I of this reports we estimate that the City will have to acquire 37 roll=off containerso 754 dc:mm~~ppsters, and two additional trucks. The total capital cost of this ' equipment is estimated at $754 125; however, we would in all likelihood utilize a three year lease purchase arrangement to acquire this equipment resulting in an annual cost of $265,000 for the next three years. Additional manpower requirements would include two commercial driver positions at an annual cost of $57,000. Miscellaneous operating costs for items such as fuels maintenance, radios, etc,, are estimated at $190000+ per year. Additional landfill expense as a result of the increased voltmie of waste is estimated at $232,038 and the increase in administrativ"e ' transfer to the general find is projected at $26,000. Thus, the total expense resulting from the City becoming the sole provider should be approximately $619,038 for the 1991-1992 fiscal year. As indicated in 1 Scenario N8 which is included in this report as Exhibit III, some of these expenses will escalate due to inflationary factors in following years. Lti .y 6 1 IM/042S910S3/1 1 ~ ■ i L MAYOR AND MEWERS OF THE CITY C"CIL Page 2 April 25, 1991 If Denton takes over all commercial solid waste collection, it is estimat- ed revenues would increase by $652,000 for the 1991-92 fiscal year. As a result of these expense and revenue projections, we would experience a small net gain of $22,962 for the 1991-92 fiscal year as a result of the City becoming the sole provider (Exhibit II), I would also point out that although we would utilize a three year lease purchase arrangement to acquire the containers and the trucks, the containers have a useful life , expectancy of at least 20 years and the trucks will provide an estimated five years of service, Given these life expectancies, the cost of provid- ing the new service will drop by approximately $265,000 after three years,- thereby creating a significant net gain in future years. F From a logistical standpoint the conversion to the sole provider status will create some obstacles {or the City. The least disruptive approach would involve a phase-in assumption of commercial accounts by geographic area over a period of one month. Loren with this approach, there will be fg confusion and some disruption of service as a result of container switch- over and billing conversions. Hopefully, we will be able to keep these problems to a minimum and resume our normal level of service within the a first month following the conversion, The City Council's decision not to sell the commercial solid waste col .x lection system and not to enter into the transfer station agreement has left the City with two basic options available for consideration. The first option involves maintaining the status quo wherein the City continues to allow open competition in the commercial arena with the City retaining the right to direct the solid waste to Denton's landfill, thereby providing rovenues to help pay .he fixed costs of the landfill. The second option involves the City establishing itself as the sole provider of commercial solid waste collection service, In both of these options, it is assumed that the City will remain in the landfill business at least until July, 1996; whereupon, the City must either expand its existing landfill site or make other provisions for disposal. The City must take action within the next year to determine the disposal options it will pursue after the current landfill has reached its J j capacity. In keeping with our previous analysis on this matter, staff has provided proformas and graphs of rates and cumulative net gain for each alternative whicli are included as Exhibit III, Additionally, staff has included the s same information for the scenario in which the customer base is eroded by z r IA2/0d2591053/2 v i" r. ~ a, s 1 1 i i MAYOR AND DfEMBERS OF 111E CITY G?Ii.NCIL Page 3 April 25, 1991 i 21 per year (Exhibit IV) . As we have Just cnsrpleted the proposed solid waste budget for 1991.92, we have been able to firm up the numbers in each Mscenario for that year, resulting in more accurate projections. In order to provide a more realistic view of events, we have attempted to maintain 4 { an annual net profit at a relatively constant level of approximately $200,000 and let residential rates remain constant or increase as neces- sary to maintain this annual net profit. In all scenarios, it is assumed a commercial rates would increase ty 3.51 per year from 1992 to 1997 and 5il per year thereafter. F:.; .rt. ~ Although the sole provider (Scenario 08) assumes an October 1, 1991) effective date, the City Attorney has informed us that the earliest effective date for such a conversion would be January 1, 1992, due to our license agreement stipulations, Such a delay will have only a small i impact financially on the analysis since all additional expenses ande revenues will be delayed. Since the January 1, 1992, date falls during I' the holiday season, which is the busiest time of the year for our comer- cial operations, we would suggest a February 1 1992, conversion date. All other assumptions in the proformas are consistent with previous t docianents provided to the Council, K' The basic alternatives available for consideration and thi ssociated advantages and disadvantages are described below! OPTION I - CONTINUE TIM STATUS UO ' FKIVAIV DISPOSAL ai i s l Adv_antages: A. This alternative continues our current system and does not i require the City and/or any customers to make any changes 3n their operations. B. Free competition for commercial service would continue within the community, C. The City would essentially set the standard for quality of r. service and would probably set the benchmark price. Disadv_antages- t FI'. A. The two citizen committees which have studied this issue and the staff have concluded that this strategy would subject Y j :r i'- Ii II lA2042591053 3 3 ! i 1 rt bN - ~ i MAYOR AND M MPERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Page 4 April 25, 1991 residential and commercial customers to long-range detrimental risks in the form of prices and service. - S. There is substantial risk to the commercial customer base for which any significant losses will have detrimental effects on financial performance of the solid waste fund and would result in higher residential, commercial and disposal rates. C. This alternative would require the City to raise residential to { $11.45 (15.071) in 1993 with an ultimate rate of $14.75 in 2005. ° Under the sole provider scenario, residential rates would increase to $10.75 (8.041) in 1993 with an ultimate rate of y , ,1 $12.50 in 2005. I D. The City is at a competitive disadvantage with this alternative F` since Denton must provide service to all customers requesting service versus being able to selectively pick the most lucrative a customers and negotiate special rates (such as apartments wherein there are many dumpsters at one location and the dump- SMr, sters often are only partially full). The City must also ~.'..i establish and publish rates rather than negotiate on a customer- G Y;. ` by-customer basis. r E. In this alternative, cumulative net gain by the year 2005 will `r}k` ' be $40953,000 as compared to $4,926,000 in sole provider scemr- lo. F .z OPTION Il - CITY AS SOLE PROVIDER OF C0144ERCIAL M=ION SE Advantages.- A• This alternative bte Public consistent Utilities with Board and recommendations the Soit forwarded Council Waste ' f: Alternatives Committee. B. This alternative would result in the most advantageous residen- tial rates as rates would increase to $10.75 (8.041) in 199 F with an ultimate rate of $12.50 in 2005. C. This alternative will result in a desirable financial return to , the City by the year 2005 - $40926,000. t . r , rn ~ r ' tea; ; ; IA2/042591053/4 11 T,,,- - _ - - l MUOR. AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COIfNCIL Page 5 April 25, 1991 D. Council would retain complete control over solid waste fees for both the collection and disposal of commercial and residential r solid waste. E, The City would retain complete control over the quality of serv ice provided and the waste stream. Control of the waste X stream will provide additional flexibility for future disposal " options. Disadvantages: ` r A. This alternative would require the City to begin immediately to deal with disposal alternatives and commit to be involved on a'' r long-range basis. 4~ B. The selection of this alternative will generate substantial camnnity opposition from those who argue for free competition " in the area of collecting commercial solid waste. C. The selection of the alternative may result in litigation against the City. D. The Council and staff would need to monitor area competitive rates to assure that the City's operation is maintaining appro- priate efficiencies. The staff will present a detailed briefing on these options at the Oxmcik Meeting of April 30, 1991. Should you have any comments or questions on x this matter, please let us lnow. Respectfully submitted, 111 oy rre City Manager t ' Prepared by., t, 11 F 1 'f .b' X B3 Angela- Director of Community Services j Approved by: ~i ~,rs~~i 1{. 'C 1 0 Son Executive Director of Utilities IA2/042S91053/5 r,rt r r ,d; EXHIBIT I - Equipment and Manpower heeds/Cost f i. EXHIBIT II - Exclusive - Additional Expense and ReVCllue EX Exclusive EXHIBIT III - Scenario 16 - Status Quo and Scenario kA - MIBI'r IV Scenario 15 E 3 1, dr i~. . u z. a n u :.d 'r! r Y. F , IA2/ M91o54 r [p i E 11 ~ .w,,+wmwrt~lwu'Y✓h`!raM~wiwwYr v~... 4 ! i J~ h t rr', idl + .YM,...n,.+n..eaae+Yn.:,rwJ`HYvw ~ 1' L y ,rk Y id t . a''k v sd, N I I I , 1 XF#IPTT I - 1PMFNC MID MANPG4VER NUDS/OOST F d 1. Ir !.f ~ { ' y t' Flu i 41 0 r` 1 1 r d, i rli p iA2/042S91054 i T r ~ r ! ~ r..x:..r. r...... r.u. a.n rxrir ra aM qf~,^r~+y'...... • •w 77 EXHIBIT I 3 FQUIMT-NT AND 1JMTOWER NEEDS CITY AS SSOELE CCQfiER IAL 4 AUIBER UNIT TOTAL ANNUAL TYPE OF NEEDED COST OOST COST EQUIPMENT 42 yd compactors 11 $ 14,000 $154,000 7 111000 77,000 30 yd compactors 1 10,000 109000 ; 20 yd Compactors 3,000 5 0 $1060000 R' . 30 yd open Top , ~tuo cuu Subtotal 250 750 2 yd SL Dumpsters 12 S 250 $ 21Soo 2 yd F1. Dumpsters 300 118,500 3 yd SL Dumpsters 395 All stets 74 315 26054 3 yd FL Dump 18 375 4 yd SL ~psters 3 400 11200 r 4 yd FL Dwpsters 103 525 540075 6 yd FL Duq%ters 48 725 34,800 8 yd FL DjVsters 525 2;236$'67 Mist, 50 ~ S 96 000 ' 79 Subtotal ~a 1 $117,000 $117,000 Front Load Ttvck 1 96,000 96 000, w Side load Truck S 71 006 Subtotal °7T;t~f6 2 $ 33,500 67,000 S 67,000 commercial Driver 2 5,700 11,400 11,400 600 Fuel 2 300 600 Uniforms 11,000 11,000 Maintenance 5,000 '000 3 000 Radios 2 2,59D 3000 Subtotal p 'F ' 5371,000 i' EOTAL ANNUAL $XPE71iSBS ^1, 0"Y, H I Y r L42/042591053/5 q d ~ . it . rh . 4 i i i i I r L MIlBIT II - EXCU1SIV£ - ADDITICM, EMSE AND RE,Yf24tJE i 1 I i .f '4 nti, a f ~ i~w ' IA2/042591054 I .r^- ...r4Y W1 4~ 4 I , , i+r C 4 r. q Nor- owl rte. e w E J'M EXHIBIT II 5 j ADDITIONAL EXPENSE AND REVENUE PROJECTIONS CITY AS SOLE C(MAERCIAL PROVIDER ( 1 ~ ,as , Annual operating Cost $371 000 1~• Landfill Expense 232,038 { Administrative Transfer 26 000 j. Total Program Costs i i.•'a Projected Revenue $652,000 • r :ter GAIN $ 22,962 1 r , . I'yr is 5 ~ l i. 1~~9r I r 1 'Fiy i t 1 fi. " . IA2/042591053/6 • sCS4,P' rA MrW.4 MNc4N~MW `.f SFn S' ~ 1• --^-..nAryy,ly NYrw r. ...na. w"p:MMM I?!a'.'•°.°- ' P , 41 r r An it ;s, r,~~tatg pN ~ { 61 IJr`' i MINT III - SCEM10 6 - STATUS QUO AND SCENARIO B EXCLUSIVE r. 't 11 4 i } st ~ f r, r I A y ~ x tir, J i J} r4 t ! t i kl, , t~ f It i n! L + i. bat . } h LA2J042591054 r 3, • "`a"?„` •'N~6M~+~5~lNkY~f'~'d4~S,rFvwttd4•r~+.a~4M.y.~. n°„,• us..ww.W. ~nw KW~W'~$s1Naa.vrv ~M 4 ,77 F ' ese y e ew u eseen c~' ~ Ia ~ s >3:! 1 s . e e, a w w e w n e s e e b f , kl ' f, F7 •e M sw sesee 'r :k g• fg anae ~g a::9>rs la~~~~~~~~ psi d Ip x an •7 G 6 3i u, ~s a Fsi ~ a si a:91 0.esl~ ex~°!8 43FX.w~a~l i ..ee.lAl xR~ ± d see ~ e s. e.rea ^ e b e e ~ R e•~ 7 3i 6 e• b e g ~ M tlc ^t: f ,~t • a e r . e e r e 0 1 s 0 e ~ r Y a r, ~.ax eee a re S serrr t s it a !n a~g• "xidl lmld~n~a if Cf0 ''S0 IC Ares i y tigC°! g ~`~ES~Yar~ (I paesre i p ~!}*nl fir. it ~ ~ 'r#Y3 ''~YY a R 11ii 1F~G IG{ fSIIR11f; ~ ~ r. } see a e.. areee ry 5 c~~glt;~ n IS aso !i4 ~Cg~s 12~'!'~!x!~ ~ ~!'11~~~~~~lA ~ i ri a i st p ci d s n ¢ C~R~~seeels xCie~~~:5`ffanAVl~gl~ 4erarslpl~x# A lisi NG 1 » C tt CI I p l 91 p C ' :j0 iese l x ~e l 5 a0i$ita ~x i Di l p Qeeere E a l ~ ~ ! r~. . a ~~I~l"■Rd~ siraelci lP~i1~,~~ 1 A~r• ~I I +OC err @S7.'° Sf lAs 7ri reree I-~ I lad ~ ~ . tl ry tld r~'j . , ~ ~ R e ~ ~ s • e ! ~ .j s • e ! O ~ ~ tiJ @' ''d ° ~ i0 e @ ! ~ ! ""1., r7 r e s r a 3 ~ ! ~ ~ L ~ ~ A ~ ~ N n !3 ! In •se @see re j Reeeee @ i~ ! ~ , rf e ~ a vg 8 rnM. W e n f • r ~.'i .1~ r~ r R Q~giC q A ~i ~iq~i N .1 M ~H i. Cl i of 4 i ~ r t ~Fs.' r:. r.w ,.,dr. J..~r~.~afra k,,. ~ ,.,...e X~f If L'U i WE _,...a:... Vas `f r • RU10ENIIAL 10.It VAIfI A901OR" • IIA105 OuU 38{81 I !0001 WWII AY3UAt ACIUAI fM II f1 IV fY IY IC II fl if II II H rM F1 $Lotus cue lilt 1990 1091 1111 1993 1114 1195 lilt IM 1111 1919 2000 tool 2002 1001 2004 LOOS I t01AL A114UM CUSIOALRS 114,132 115,144 116,110 111,302 114,611 111,311 101.711 190,143 115,171 20,111 205,191 210,161 216,365 111,011 221,101 131,153 111,151 I table Verde CAl1ActAd 17,011 10,114 71,614 11,955 10.510 11,171 IS,1S0 15,135 N,Ol3 10,112 12,470 11,069 mm I04lll 102,110 115,111 101,161 I Aug Cubic MI Cult 1.50 $.11 1.45 1,15 4.45 1.45 1.45 411 445 445 0115 1.45 1.45 1.4s 1.45 1.43 1.45 4 A90 110 till ! Cult 1.01 9,31 1,15 11.31 11.15 11.41, HAS 11.15 11.00 13.15 11.33 11.35 ISM 11.10 11.3 14.11 14.1S REVENUES - S Residential role 11,564 11,631 11,154 12,011 12,016 12,016 12,112 12,217 11,117 12,674 11,113 12,111 12.121 12,111 $S,III 13,441 ls,531 6 lei t0otlol Aiceuo 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 e 1 O 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 f 0 4 O 0 I 1 e 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 NOIOIAt • COST REV 11,514 $1,631 !1.754 12,017 12,046 12.016 12,302 $2,211 11,$57 12.14 121113 07,115 11,121 12,107 13.IS2 131111 13,131 It sale of A1lu1o ball 41 43 IS 11 SO $4 51 12 66 It 11 IS I1 16 103 111 lit II Con. AI9. 0 0 71 41 164 112 IDS lit 54 1141 4311 171 14 Ill 111 154 lU II Landfill Rau. 0 1 24 16 1231 14 11 41 1421 tot Ill 151 136 71 31 11011 11 I1 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 14 WAL RCVS 111612 111401 11,117 11,154 11,133 12,156 12,426 12,401 12111 61,150 12,150 11,017 13,110 13,211 13,452 11,604 11,141 1 ; EaAEAOI IL41S 15 IaYnll $611 till 4101 1121 1662 1905 1"0 1491 11,011 11,011 11.154 11,212 1013 11,332 11,104 11,111 11,541 It 1u0e11u 214 141 129 lei 212 161 112 211 194 106 111 3S1 344 Ise 311 311 402 I) RAInIONme I55 111 152 101 111 111 121 111 IIS 112 141 IS1 IN M III 110 110 Il 14ruIC11 129 11 141 161 190 Ili 115 114 204 214 all 136 211 260 211 111 301 it Inluronc4 26 24 26 36 40 41 11 It 41 SI if 14 36 SI d0 62 14 ' 201VndrV 1 1 31 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 ► ► 21 old Debt 2 1 7 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 11 Akin lranefele to 171 211 741 111 263 114 IIS Ill 104 320 133 141 160 314 111 405 121 11 AhIA WWII% CC 0 1 41 41 SO $2 $I 56 51 60 42 64 61 t0 11 h 19 14 Landfill2906le4 196 245 231 240 146 249 25S 263 111 406 411 421 431 411 462 S11 161 ;t it 101AL IN IWI 11,606 11.113 11;161 11,111 12,021 1{,015 11.116 12.270 12'114 12'101 12.111 12,115 It.160 0.011 13,121 1011 13 611 14 NE1 or 11004110NS 426 Ilil22 124 1211 113 1211 1250 1321 IM 1211 1212 17it $720 lilt 1220 WI 1217 CAA AAO NON OAEI LRtENst r 27 Ile14 kill$ 10 111 Ill 121 11 l20 120 120 120 Ill 120 120 120 120 Ito 124 110 A R to Debt SaNlu ► 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 6 1 ► 1 1 1 I 1 0 0 I ► 1 1 1 1 4 1 4 1 Rnee 1 1 1 21 OlA4r I11 11 Ae! OA 1119 WAS 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 2l lncr to Iorbinl cap e 1 1 1 4 1 I 1 1 1 ► 1 I 1 1 1 1 it 1 1 1 0 1 0 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 31 101 NON O1Lt Lap 10 111 111 Ill ....11 "120 110 "124 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 R6 Its . L' it 101 OA 1 ION OA 1113 11,606 11 101 611111 11,145 $1.021 13,141 12,114 hill 11,434 VMS 11.116 Ulls$ 121111 13,10 61.143 Slim 0,411 t, 111118 111111 191111 911111 111111 x1111 112111 111119 111111 tl:lit 11211 IIIit I 1IIIII lltll9 111141 wall alkali 4 17 Nit 1AIRML0111 126 111241 111 Ill! 1201 $151 1210 1119 1114 1231 1211 till 1200 We 1211 11'n 1211 u 11:918 Ill191 I91111 911111 111111 111111 119211 111111 111111 11 as Ia IIa 11 911111 111u1 fill II III16A a I I I I I Isla li ii 31 10701st AT i 1.51 I 1 11 14 1S to R 161 211 III 111 221 Ill 194 he 4Y 11 CA AN Oil IAIN11L/111 lit 1224 1410 Ilse 111020 11,113 11,511 111111 12.214 11,111 11.0411 Wall 11,911 141st 14 9131 41 IIACEMI COO 144 M1X TILL 11111. 1.121 111113 1,111 1.001 11621 4001 10,641 11191 1.001 1,001 1.121 1.016 ' LIST Em 1.141 11 Oil Milli VALUI 11200 11.110 41 fill hetslOf VA101 it 1405 11,174 1 n 941 L 1 1 y v r1 , COM[RC IAI 60110 YAl I! PROfORMA - SIAlu3 OUD 16:11; II Is 1 loo) i I CI-LC•t[ 910AL ACIUAL li r7 11 If 1f 11 It IS Fl FT 11 it F1 It If ( status lug 1911 1110 1111 [to? IHS 1194 151s list t191 1991 1195 2000 2001 '102 INS 2004 705 1 folk RONIIAL CUSTOMERS 11,621 13,102 12,120 12,111 12,173 12,154 13,111 11.4+5 15,101 11,151 11,521 11,100 11 ,218 15,611 li,112 it, 517 14,141 I Cubic Vitas Collected 111,115 111,252 112,030 112,101 113,165 113,31t 111,163 112,111 111,195 203,511 701,111 211,521 211.116 221,414 231,155 236,361 112,531 I Art cubit ?do I tilt 11.01 1t." 14.31 14.3I 1431 14.31 14 31 11.51 ILSI 3131 1151 14.11 1111 14.31 MISS 14.11 10,51 I Its lilt I Cutt 11,11 10.11 IIS.SS 111.11 175.3 131.11 132,51 111.23 142,04 141,14 19 11 164.42 112.45 111,20 1".34 119,11 10/.15 S 1 ► 1 0 1 1 0 e 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 j + o ► 1 o- a o 1 0 o e o e e o 0 0 1 ` RIYfMUh 1 Commercial Ills 11,311 11,306 11,110 11,521 11,591 11,110 !1,313 11,110 11,!60 12.110 62.114 12,450 12,631 12,144 $3,014 13,101 IS,111 ` 1 0 1 e 1 1 0 1 a o 1 a 1 e 1 ► 1 I IS 1 0 0 1 I a I o ► ► 0 I I e 1 1 e LO O 1 / 0 0 0 1 0 0 e 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 I It 3N101AL - COST Its 11,313 11,316 111110 WIN 111595 11,660 111143 11,141 11,160 (3,510 12,111 12,450 Wall 12,144 13,064 (3,301 13,I1t , 12 Lican11 Flo 0 36 41 41 41 11 13 I I I I 1 0 0 0• 1 1 IS 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 0 0 I I 1 e I I 1 1 ys , II 9 0 / 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 I 0 1 1 0 . IS 101AL A3YINU[1 11,313 11,422 111511 Il,l14 11,434 11101 11,175 11,131 11,42 It 211 13,214 12 .04 12.63f 17,144 13,064 13,301 1316!1 e [IOtN011UR[! Id Nlroll 1421 1311 fill 0410 $Sol 191 1511 1624 1521 Slit 1111 $131 1100 1961 11341 WIN 11.201 11 Wallis 41 31 SS 23 ti 11 IS IS 91 104 111 Ile 121 111 143 152 145 11 Naiolim a, 113 171 161 219 351 lit 110 114 701 24 241 210 131 301 324 341 NS 11 Service$ 129 61 lid 111 $4 it 64 it 74 10 It 11 59 III 111 124 111 20Imurame 70 11 It 21 24 31 11 21 31 13 35 It 40 42 13 41 11 4 DY 12 Its I I 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 I 1 1 ) ` !1 era 06L { 6 1 f 4 ` f I t 1 1 ) 1 2 I I I 1 I rf~ 13 ldsin Irinders 0 4? 11 61 it 2S it 12 11 14 10 lot Ili Ill 129 1st 141 351. 24 WIA Ir6nshq CC I I 0 1 I 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 r, % . 2S 11011f211 tKIIAN 410 165 546 $41 511 $65 SN 751 201 111 935 959 915 1,011 1,011 I'm I,lil 14 folk lRN[NSU 11.113 11,331 11,407 11,443 11,440 I1,SSS 11,101 11,69 11,143 17,111 12,111 12,424 12,552 12.411 01,011 16,111 {6,161 11 Rfi OIfI IM 110 113 1153 1113 (521 Slid W$ fill 111 (1101 11771 176 112 III! 1211 1112 (DI CAI 110 001 Poll 101451 "r. 11 field $still 10 III OF 1t$ 115 114 150 120 121 111 124 121 171 Ill 111 111 1711 1 • ~f 11 Peel Welts I e I I I I 0 1 1 I 1 ► I 1 1 { f 101tN11 tiolm6 I 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 0 I I I I 1 1 It Ist OA low trim 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f n~' 1 31 lmr is Vorllnl Cal 1 1 1 e 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N I ! 1 / 1 1 0 1 0 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 34 104 A01 OKI Up if oil ...141 !11 iH hl ' '150 120 121 014 IN Ill 121 471 121 Ili „121 . 15 101 021141100 Poll try 11,213 II11SO 11 144( 1021 11,411 11 341 111.01 11,!09 11,101 11,201 121375 11.411 11,115 Jim? 11,111 11,141 #3,301 ~N 1> lilies dleet$ atlltl tilt" Imll r11111 little Iletst 111111 111!11 little 11111t 111111 ttS let allies Jena 111111 ' 34 IllIFINI"11) 131 112 114 141 116 1142 Ills 1142 Ise 11141 11111 1111 134 lilt lies fill fill. 41 r. 111119 mm nun 631111 level little little lilies It1JJl tittle 11111 little lent Relit 14!1!6 sill- 721111', . . 11 rtlKtR2 CNI 10 NIA Ills ILNI 11,121 I,NI LIPS 1,501 1,501 $,101 1.501 1,101 1,001 1.001 LN1 1.101 LNI 1101 1.101 o- ii +1 41 .r. I 1 . a x, q rt. 5,.' it s. : v r~ , Y r r .l t ow"i 1 W owl uwonu IllruanA • a7a7u5 bud If:27:N (4 N 10001 ~ CR-IC•11 1t1uk ACIL41 II Il fl (r PI 71 II PI II f1 It fl rl IT II SUlva Ou0 1111 1110 1991 1912 1913 1994 1195 1156 1RSI IM fill 1000 2001 2002 2001 204 INS , 1 CI Its. 17,033 It. 111 71,414 11,113 lo,SIO 1011 61 ISO 15,1 SS 11,116 90,115 12,111 95,011 11,510 IOO,f11 102,736 105,111 Id1,lU rf{ I C1 tor. 9111291 119,252 111,030 111,906 11015 1151111 111,112 111,697 111,695 201,611 201,111 213,221 111,146 124,416 111,10 236,366 242,631 t e CI Cash 10,751 21,106 21,162 21,110 21,114 21,111 31,101 21,151 22,045 32,911 MW 11,410 15,124 56,151 11,101 31.171 11,310 IIII~ 4 t1 Cenl. S1,11S 61,141 61,111 61,510 14,115 71,111 73,162 11,417 11,591 11,596 10,14S 12,150 11,101 11,116 11,400 91.133 II, 121 I Cl other 1,201 11111 1,916 11001 2421 LOU 2302 2,155 1,101 11141 21526 21111 1,111 1,W 11310 1666 1,115 f i0t Cl !el,O1S 351,006 361,640 361,06 111,001 770,111 111,511 300,635 171,351 106,566 117,171 421, Ott 111,111 450,102 662,16{ 611,516 416,121 I Cue, If 2,130,125 2,500,o0D 2,111,610 1,125,114 1111,101 5,161,1511,111,1414,121,113 5.121,162 1321,s011.14S.4it a V3,5s1 4,111,190 1,261,112 1,123,951+,200,694 1,611,413 PEOENUES toottitlI0s 121 211 201 109 242 214 151 251 361 Sit W 193 103 414 625 531 sit 1 1 Cash till it 19 Il 11 in 103 105 101 152 ISO 160 114 161 111 M 211 146 7 ' 30 Other 300 S 0 1 a 1 1 1 1 If 11 II II si 12 12 Is 11 11 In fill 196 215 131 140 216 lit 25S 762 111 406 117 126 411 411 112 122 561 12 Con Poll 430 $55 141 141 161 145 Sit 511 101 911 911 951 Its 1,010 1,131 Ims 1,211 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 1 24 1UtiOIAL•11v5 tell 11,101 11,011 11,011 WAS? 11,170 11.193 11,222 11,140 IMS1 11,104 It 916 12,001 12,040 12.111 12,442 12,611 Is + 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 + 1 1 + !f 1 1 1 e 0 I 0 1 1 + + 1 1 1 + I 1 k j, 11101 REV 1121 111109 11,015 11311 11,31 11,110 11,141 11,211 11310 11,151 11,906 111954 12,001 12,060 42,13) 12,441 $$.111 I INPENOIIUNII 11 PAVrol1 1211 1211 1241 1271 1214 1313 list 1361 1311 fail We 1415 071 iSH 1601 1650 1491 { tia it 1,111114 2s 54 41 61 It so 14 Sl 41 is as 31 11 14 11 95 IP2 20 pilot IS5 232 111 154 310 111 191 230 226 241 261 212 361 Ili 151 lit 404 OI fervll6s lit 301 IN ill 261 146 IS1 191 112 195 210 Ili 214 162 212 301 121 2110 9 10 10 20 21 22 N 21 21 21 31 31 14 11 11 42 is ;i 2J (uMry I + + 1 I 0 ► + 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 + II b10401 f 1 L ! 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 SS Akio irfAlflrt Sf 21 34 29 10 21 34 It It 40 43 46 49 S1 SI S9 61 it 26 Odell 1rf010ts CC I I 1 I 0 0 1 1 1 + + 1 + 0 + + 1 d 11 WAI It I 1 0 1 I I 1 I 0 0 I 1 6 + + 21101733, 1911 1041 I73 Illf 170! NII 110 1103 061 1921 1991 (1,073 111141 II,1SS 11,321 11,12{ 11,131 11341 21 HE loco IIVENUCS 1215 Wt 1271 1316 1313 1021 1310 1360 1614 1015 1031 $ill 1122 1133 till r 1104 11,011 CAP AN IN Doll CIIINst 1101wld As0t1 10 10 11 10 04 Its 10 14 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 to 10' 1r " 11 Debt tire 143 211 102 113 111 171 W 360 671 Ilse 451 aSo 614 am AS$ ell - 4w 32 tan) Cloture Ishd I 1 1 100 300 101 Ito !N 1 1 1 1 i + 1 SI w 11 1d D6 too ira4t + 1 4 1 1 1 + 0 1 1 I 1 1 + + 1 a ' f 14 1 1 1 + + 1 1 + + I + 1 ( + I+ 1., 1S Debt lotlrowl + 1 is as 6s 4s Is 45 0 1 I 1 t 1 i 1; , . 4 ;a . Si:t 31 101 NON Nt1 111 1141 1211 1112 1131 1131 1331 till 1311 041{ lest list (914 16% list 04!a , Il,llt 11 111 • 11101lotmolO/itIKI 621 1,123 11041 11043 1,110 1,016 1,112 1.313 1,512 1,451 1,713 1.05 1,111. 1,113 •+1,011 'i,1ilIto I Miss IIts It 111111 r I I I II 111111 MM t11114 !:till IIILiI 913111 111111 111111 1 ILit: 111111 little 111111 /11111 31 9111 CA1111 (011 (1121 111 lot 11211 114 111 141 11421 1201 Ill! list Ill! 111 113 (01011 ~!I 140111 1I11II 1tllIt Iuut IItIII tillis 1I11Li 111171 IIII11 Ill 111 I I I I I I If 1its little Lillie I I I I I I 111111 Wilt] 112118 19 LANDFILL At 1.24 11" 1.000 1.000 1.050 1150 $1110 1,150 1.150 11100 11100 am 1,10+ "fe 1.st1 . Mil "SO ICom I llll 't r 40103 IU 11 3.14 3,111 1.000 1,100 1.450 1,150 1.01 1.450 4.710 4.730 1.156 1.750 4.150 1.110 0,151 1.410 61251 t' IOONI,tA3N,Ol) f, e , ,r 1 rV . r ' , , I A pY -1 as , LL Ow, % 4 PLSIDEN11A1 IOIID IA311 PAOFOAMA • (ICSUSIrE 15:21:12 it 110001 kla4rlo 1 AC1UA1 ACIVAI ft 1t II 1r 19 It If It It If If 1t It JI 11 1111 1191 1911 1112 1113 1191 1191 1191 1111 1111 1199 MOP 2001 1002 1011 1001 2005 li . 1 ID1Al ANNUAL WITOWS 11052 I151M 111,210 171,302 Ill 661 lot .341 111.111 110,141 195,111 200,111 105,191 210-141 211,365 222,111 117,101 233,153 119,154 1 Cubit 111,10 tolUctid 11,131 19,114 11,491 11,155 034 11,119 13,150 IS 131 11,015 10,111 92,010 95,011 fl,!}I 500,115 !02,110 105,111 501,311 19 1 q 1,45 0.45 I,IS I,IS LIS LIS 1.1! I Atl Conk ids 1 Cult I1SO 0.15 1.45 1.45 ltl 1.41 4.45 IIS I.45 t Awl at% till I Wt 1.0 1.31 1.11 10.43 11.15 10.15 11.75 11.71 Il.2S II.50 11.75 11.15 11.11 11.15 11.15 12,50 f2.S1 , A[130UE1 P' S lle ldentlal floe 11,511 111151 11,111 11,151 11071 11,941 11,991 12,014 12,!91 12,105 92115 11,411 92,512 12609 02,671 17,122 12,191 0 on kAci61 lictul a 9 / 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 F p 1 1 0 1 I 0 1 4 1 1 1 e 1 0 1 1 A l 1 1 0 1 e 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 SUIIOIAE • COSI All 111514 Will 1Lobo 11.653 91,121 11,911 11.196 111011 11,111 12.303 12,115 12111 12,541 12601 13,417 12,121 12,191 ID 341. o} A41use 11¢s to 43 41 61 10 SI $I it it 72 }t 11 19 16 ill III III 11 Colo. low. 0 0 14 S 114 Ili 111 111 34S !52 136 321 431 345 611 655 191 12 Landfill Pa, 1 1 2s 121 21 134 132 IPS t311 Ill 111 251 221 116 140 till 104 It 1 I A 1 / 0 0 1 0 1 0 If 0 1 0 1 1 l4 101A1 pill 11.431 11,611 11,191 12,026 11,111 12,!10 12,562 12.61? 11,111 42 121 111OOS 13,131 13,211 13,414 121911 11,00 S1,111 I OPINDI IUAES k I{ Pitfall 1161 1}11 1161 1191 till loll 1921 1911 111020 11,011 II3I21 11,111 11,140 41,302 11,367 11,435 11,101 11IuDllies fill lot 121 311 241 251 241 211 390 301 114 331 340 154 361 W JH i 11 98inten4nte ISS 121 Ill 159 141 11s Ill Its 203 373 121 135 211 259 111 18 300 ' WOWS 121 11 Ill Ill 110 196 Its Ill MI 211 12S 216 241 240 111 !11 311 19 Insurance if 21 26 11 21 21 s0 it 11 13 14 15 !6 31 31 40 41 ! It sundry 1 I I A 1 0 1 1 6 0 I I I 1 I 1 1 21 Lad Debt I 1 1 t 1 t 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 2 I 9 1 22 Adalm tremters 16 171 20 241 253 213 214 215 196 $01 170 333 !16 160 1}t 311 405 121 ~E }t, 23 Idols irinslus tt 1 1 41 41 SO Sf 51 K 8 60 q N ft 11 13 76 19 24 1.4041111 license 194 143 M 240 Ill 119 25S 241 all 404 111 421 431 OIL 442 121 516 as total IIPENSts 12606 11,213 11,161 11,111 12,041 12,103 12,194 11.281 12,41S 12,117 13,142 12.140 12,116 13.115 13.211 11.443 13,621 26 Nil it 011ilatlON3 IIf (111121 Ill 141 113 1216 1361 1361 1111 1111 $263 1211 1217 1331 1315 11201 1214 CAI MO "I fail il1i131 ` 111 limit Assets if Ill III 120 13 121 120 110 121 120 120 M 121 120 Ill 120 1120 II Debt lerrits A A t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 j It Other, GgAs6 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 / I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 4 i $0 lot OA In trims 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 0 1 31 IAU 10 lodinl to 0 1 1 1 1 I I 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 I 1 . i . t fI 13 I0t ADO DPIP (OP 10 212 111 120 11 120 120 121 1I1 110 220 120 131 M 120 111 ' N) J 3610' O9 {101 Of 291 11,104 111101 111111 Il•190 12,015 12.121 12,114 12.301 12,455 12,201 $2,16t 12,80 13,000 13 115 11,121 113,46! ; 11,445 otf a el Ill a to II e ue Stills 911111 114:11 Suw 711111 stilts Awu Most e7 e1H 11 wool 11;w It'Iis 'fultl Alela it N(1 OAIo/Mll 126 01111 Ill 121 114 fill 1146 !Ill till 1111 1241 1250 If11 1301 1311 1.11 1114 almost 113ett 112th Iunt oil 11o II I21a Mile 1111 I1 tune 112131 lot l to II II I1 180111 egoist I I M i $lolos 'ell ate r !I INIll111 At 1 11501 1 1 3 1 14 It 11 is Ill III 114 - IH at 119,, ill It tuN MR Ill 11AINAED81 Ill 141. 1111 $114 1614 Il,lls 11,81 111151 11,911 11,121 11,111 N1111 13,111 14,111 ' 14,910 19 IERtllt tNN01' 11511 1.131 MA 1.111 1061 4.001 l8t 4.411 6121 I'm 4.101 1.101 1.011 0.0% 1.111 I to 401111131111 IAtul IN 1006 13,126 41 Oil 110001 9AIUI !w MOS 11,81 -...-......,~rv 1.I,. owl b } i COInfRC1Nl fOIIP YPSIt VNOIONM • t45tuilrf ' IS:21:1! I) N 10001 LAbl1ll ACTUAL Ar1UAt if it or it 17 to f7 or It it F7 FT H IT kMeriN l 1919 1990 1111 1992 till 1131 1093 194 1111 liis 1199 2400 7001 not 2001 2004 2003 i I TOTAL ANNUAL CUSTOIIEAS 14,121 .13,102 11,720 12,117 12,124 12,311 21,14 U.491 21,04 Kill 23.152 IS, 091 j16.111 17,311 !1,012 31,113 29,311 E 1 t4/ic 76rd1 to11•cp4 141,295 111,1S2 112,110 264,110 211,759 144,113 111,112 171,114 211,111 211,141 293170 301,116 331,45 311,80 JUJU 016,!12 145,100 I An Wic oil 2 twit 11.01 IIM l9 11 11161 11.41 II.0 11,11 11.17 11.61 11,61 11.11 11.11 '11.17 11.17 31.11 11,17 13.41 4 Nth Bill 1 Cott 11.71 100.11 MM 91,05 100,13 101,11 101.10 111.31 IIS.11 111.11 117.01 133.44 140.11 MAI 131,41 111,11 01,11 S 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 4 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 / 0 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 N[YENVtI 1 C4111rclil 1441 11,317 11,344 11,410 12.164 171237 121111 12.461 (1,616 12015 02,111 11,211 17,461 13.177 4,04 14,354 11,414 $I,45 1 9 0 1 0 0 1 P 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 f f 4 1 1 0 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 10 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 II sul10IAL • LUSI AIY 1,311 Ollie l $1,470 (2,164 12,253 12,319 11,161 12,111 12.71S 12,116 13,111 13,161 IJ,731 14,176 14,351 14,411 11,41S 12 tic411e Fei 0 34 46 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 4 1 IJ 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 I 1 1 14 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 It I I 1 1 1 1 IS IOlil IDIOM 11,30 11,412 11,511 12.164 Will 12,149 Wool 121116 11,14 12,911 11,211 13,461 }3,731 14,176 11,311 Kill 111133 IAPUDINIE3 ( I II A4Yroll 1421 fill 1411 $Sol lilt 1372 0613 1661 0110 1145 1123 Me 1/4 11,023 11,103 11,111 $I've M 1 2110001111 41 is 91 10 71 11 92 li I5 300 106 Ill 121 121 137 114 1U ' 11 Ailnt4nAncd Ill 171 lid 130 161 111 Ni. 221 14 14 273 296 JN 311 149 Ifs 121 le tu4icil Ill 69 l4 401 403 ISO Ill 110 201 211 231 252 271 212 311 311 204 20Insur4na4 20 19 10 12 11 11 21 21 if 11 J3 M 31 If 13 11 41 + 11IuMrf 1 0 1 1 I 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 It lid light 1 4 f 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 LO 11 II 10 M 11 to 411 2I Will iriDIfiti to 47 11 47 11 203 to, Ill 121 121 111 141 153 MI 110 Ill 201 lit 24 4610 111n61u1 cc 1 I 0 f 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 `t 2Il•ndillll11eMe 430 Me 544 111 791 103 137 Ill 091 I'M 1,311 LS63 1,401 1,437 1,415 I,Iq 1,111 G . I 26 IOfAt 11110M v 11'11S 111119 1,441 (11OH 11.11 Wild 12,012 12,154 121101 12,112 12,031 11,111 03,171 13,413 13,441 IJ Nl 14,110 u,... •m.• • n.• you ,u,.. 21 Net OF14lire IM I4 We 2600 1129 1215 421 4416 0111 file 11N list 1413 ..Isis IiM . IN! • 1111 LAP at ON lF01 Itells( ~ i 21 Flood 111101 10 111 141 193 115 134 ISO 121 1!l 124 (J6 121 41 121 171 111 121 1 'Vi 20 belt liroice 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 It I I I 10 other INDIAN 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 0 1 1 f 1 I 11 Not 011 Inc Inn, 1 I I 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r' i M lisp IN tortiM td 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 4 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 _ U I 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 $t 4r in "IN INF !i 131 141 193 111 134 'ISO 120 122 124 ...$21 1 1 1 1 1 .1 IN 121 121 Itl IN 121 is 101 OF1A111011 fifth tip 11,111 11,050 11,144 01.111 12,1M 12 ,161 12,012 11.14 11130 12,131 11,111 11,141 fS.306 01,411 131dl' 14,010 14,14 V},k t $$111t $$111! 921111 ttttet re t t Il stills Ititt4 I I I I II 1 1111 1 111111 is l il l Miss I t I l to tletit stills 11••:' • , JI Ili IAIN1lt0111 oil 14 114 1411 1ills$ 11111 {l is 1114 Ian (374 Nld 445 1111 0116 027 IIJI Jill I: 1111 ksl ' 1111 r mist cues 111111 111111 little 111113 Molt 111126 119111 212111 Mlls etlen 114111 111141 11rlls 141111 111111 t 31 FIPMT CNI IN NTH till 11.101 13,620 •M.011 I,S41 1.413 I'M 1.501 I,MI S. 001 1.001 Mile 1.101 1.101 I.IN 1100 1.01 1, V 1 q, y.. I-A A1 ...w..~ ~.....V~.~..~.~ n... `11,26 A. 't + 1111. y 7j ! 1 = r LANDFILL MGM • IMU11V1 II I looo) 1l:H,12 CAI-LI-ti AC1U01. At IUAL FY F9 F7 F7 Fl FI FY FI rY II II FI II It II kintrif 1 1911 1190 till 1911 1993 1191 1195 1996 1991 INI Im 2000 2001 1001 loci 1001 loci 1 tY 416. 17,031 F1,111 }1,191 11,155 101570 11,7}1 13,750 IS.I3! 61,415 10,111 92,671 15,019 17,571 100,111 1011131 105,111 101,162 1 Cl Clot 111415 179,252 112.030 210,150 141,151 26],71! 20,111 211,114 211,111 261,111 215,670 603,304 $11,105 111,610 321,141 tit. Ito 345,100 3 C1 Cash 31,151 11.104 21,142 21,110 21,311 211111 $0,492 31,251 12,045 121011 11,731 14,420 35,524 16,451 J1,401 $1,311 111310 4 CI Cook. SJ,79S 11,141 61,111 11160 1,014 1,111 1,290 1,111 11662 1,162 1,061 1,211 11113 1,11! 1,411 91116 1,111 S C1 Othsr 1,201 blot 1,196 1,007 1,011 21053 1,101 I'M 1,201 1,267 11121 1.111 1,641 11511 11S}1 11616 3,111 6lotCl 341,115 151,001 341,640 511,211 110,290 111,500 341,361 000,111 410,145 421,111 432,112 443.151 451,112 411,110 471,421 411,113 104,113 r' I Ni. it 2.111,125 1,500,000 2,111,640 31s1.911 1,12f,421 4,00!,123 1,171.101 4.711.141 1,201,121 !,610,100 6,062,172 4,506.031 4,061.171 7,125,511 7,ID61191,319,IS11.904,116 1 WWII 1 ConlritI. te16 111 211 20i 21 24 25 1S 24 ]t 31 1B 11 40 At at 41 $I s 1 Cut loss 61 11 11 17 101 101 105 101 152 156 160 111 Ito 113 111 201 216 10 OlhtF Fits 5 6 1 4 1 1 1 1 10 11 51 11 11 12 11 14 11 11 M0 tell 194 245 211 240 24d 241 l51 261 111 406 417 421 431 411 111 122 sit 9 11 cook (oil 430 555 Sot 711 191 LOS IU 134 191 1,21} 31131 1,365 1,401 1,417 I'm 1,66! 1,112 I. IS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 I I II101VA1-A1y5 1121 11,101 11,015 11,111 11,116 81.111 11240 11,211 11,501 11,107 11151 12.001 12,061 17,114 12,111 11,00 11,701 IS 1 1 0 0 A 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 f II 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 I 0 0 0 1 I 1 1 I 11 10110 1621 11,101 WOOS 11,111 111176 KM 11,210 $11M I1,SOl 11,107 11,151 11,041 12,061 01,114 11,110 12,450 12,107. , j.. i 14PCND01111S 1 < 11 Flytoll 1223 1271 1267 1211 1291 1311 041 1364 1394 1424 Iasi 1191 1521 1564 4611 106 (101 11lupollls 23 SI 47 31 41 3o Al 11 0 SO 53 56 61 64 61 13 11 10 MINI [is 211 Ill 141 114 !4d 111 140 201 220 211 Ili 17S 291 111 lot 161 21 10tiitis SS4 Sol 122 175 110 ISO Ill 311 116 100 215 211 241 261 111 311 131 . ~ . "i. It In I 10 10 10 II 12 12 11 if IS 11 II II If 11 22 it 711uhtry 1 1 0 1 D 1 0 0 1 B 1 0 1 0 1 i 1 j 24 046 Wtt 1 5 I 1 I 3 I I l l 1 I I I I l f IS W41rinslorl 4 23 34 29 k 12 34 16 31 40 43 46 0 S1 54 51 li it 26 WIN Ironsln6 t I 1 0 0 I 1 I 1 1 0 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 t lotnl if 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 I 1 1 IT 21IOIAIIIF 1566 (110 1111 Iola Ill! 1721 1141 loll loll 5151 11,024 11,101 111111 11,112 Ii'm 11,410 IS.110 1 ~jp . . . 11 Nit apH 111.40 IM 1191 1273 1459 1162 1471 1441 1414 1622 1154 103 1101 1111 1041 1402 140 II.g1 CAP AND 00100 .0 119CNSl R FiM Am's 10 to to 10 16 Its 10 $1 10 ID 10 IO 10 10 14 it 10 31 Dt0t firr Ili Ill 202 103 115 oil 214 110 656 fit 654 651 oil M NI 111 !N 31 taod1ill tlclors 1 1 1 100 100 101 100 lot 1 1 1 1 1 I I It 10 11 let Do Inv tram 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 0 14 14K IN fork 411 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I f t 1 1 0 I! 016t 1.1111610 1 1 45 45 45 as is 45 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1, 36 101 104 toll 111 1263 1211 1241 1331 4516 1331 „6401 Illi 4654 '1454 Iasi 1656 lost 414 list rI ,Ili it Ill t 11lo10F10CII04110 121 1.121 1,011 11414 1.150 1,0S4 11171 1,134 11111 11401 1,010 1.751 Flit 1,511 "M14 11464 11 f Y Mill 111991 111311 ill tit 111111 M321 tit 111 II I I I I II Kit I I I I I I 1111st IM 111 1I I I I I 413111 111111 181111 I. 714414 ? 39 Nil IAIII 00 11021 111 Sill 126 1134 1132 fill 11111 Ili of" 1251 1221 (964 Im Im" It" Z ' 110311 11131! 114111 117447 441141 141311 774444 /14476 711111 111144 111114 174714 117411 1!1161 411111 111111 Yllllt Itlfil 1 11 LANDFILL II 1.350 1.01 1.000 1.00 3,140 $19 1.010 1.151 3.350 6301 41104 4,100 1,100 1100 4,500 6151 ('ISI, Ito" 1 Atli I It LMOOILL 11 1.150 1.100 3,100 1.000 3,450 1.010 1,451 1,450 6110 4.150 6154 1.110 6754 4.110 4,110 1751 11.214 ItDIl1,CN0,011 A , 1.[F t 5 o~ r i i ' Y 71 }a; . r r ` I 13 Y" EXHIBIT IV - SCENARIO :I5 , 1 3 >f rp y ~ f ( R Y f 1( r ,y l;~ ~ .4 if r IA2/042591054 o I~ ;Yf r7 7 1 I R351OEMIIAI SOLID 131511 FAUIOINA 16:15:20 If 11000) 5 ` - tA9.141t F SMnllle 1 S ACIOAL ACTUAL F1 11 II 11 If 11 If It if. 11 R FI• 11. If F1 7 ` 1019 1990 1991 1092 1997 1991 1995 1996 1997 1191 1991 2000 2001 2002 2001 2104 JOGS I IOIAI ANNUAL CV010AEll 111,557 175.11 176,210 111,502 111.161 111,544 115.211 190.315 195,17} 200,211 205,491 !10,162 216,565 222,013 221,W} 233,155 131,151 - 1 2 colic faros tollctod 17,031 11,114 11,04 71,155 10.516 11,771 13,754 11,135 11,015 90,111 91,670 15,019 11,570 100311 102,131 305,111 14i'm ` 1 Avg Co010 its 1 Cost 1.50 M5 1.43 O.IS 1.45 1.45 0.45 0.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 0145 1.45 1.16 1.45 1.45 1 Arp Ito lilt J Cull 9.01 9.11 1.95 41,50 11.10 12.00 12.55 13.25 M95 ISM 16.25 10S 17.45 11.20 11.95 11,11 11.00 NIVENUES S Residential Fees 11,514 11,411 11,754 12,039 12,126 12,111 12,331 12,522 12.11 13,104 SS,331 13332 13,111 11,041 11,317 11,465 15,131 - 61es Special Si0up 0 I I 1 / 0 0 0 1 I 1 a I I 4 1 a 1 I r o a o 0 1 I 1 a a 1 1 a 1 1 1 / B I 0 1 / 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 9 SU110101. • USE REV 11,584 11,631 11,754 12,119 12,126 12,316 12.131 12.522 12,411 13,104 13,531 1S,S32 13,116 14,041 14,30 14,465 11,037 10 Sole of Aefusa lags 41 43 45 41 50 34 51 0 66 it 71 It 19 W 101 Lit 119 0 I 71 75 113 59 1211 1421 12011 IS511 13913 11311 (416) 15211 ISIS) 1131 0211 II tow. Nov. 12 tandli1) Au 0 0 24 so 1511 it It 1341 (1111 1 151) (1251 1155) 1211) 17111 12241 15711 , SS I / a 0 0 0 1 1 a 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 IDEAL NEVS 11337 11,441 11,197 12,170 12,231 12,330 12,306 13,106 12,655 12325 12,961 13,051 13,190 13,332 11,413 11,637 15,101 EAPEMOITLOES - IS lalfoll 1611 1111 1761 1121 ME 1905 1950 1991 11.011 11,091 51,151 $1,717 11,113 11,111 01,404 S1,04 11.541 is Supolles 234 Ill 229 242 252 262 222 213 294 $06 791 331 NI 351 111 311 407 i' 1) Minhnmce IM lit 152 101 111 117 123 121 115 142 145 Its 114 312 Ill 290 111 it Serolcss 119 19 167 161 190 116 Its 294 204 211 22S 236 241 260 111 217 lot 11 Snserime 26 26 26 31 40 42 44 46 41 50 51, 54 Sv SI 66 63 44 20 SundiV i 0 0 0 I 0 I 1 0 4 1 11 0 1 1 1 1 ' 21 144 Debt 7 7 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 ! 1 9 1 22 04911 1rAnsten u 171 213 243 755 263 214 711 246 301 331 315 346 lit 374 301 405 411 11 Ablo Isonsters CC 1 1 41 41 So 52 51 51 51 60 62 N 67 10 73 11 79 6 24 landfill Upedse 196 245 231 240 246 241 25S 262 530 4% 411 421 4S9 451 162 $22 541 , 25 IDEAL WPEMS(S 31,606 11,197 11.169 11,111 52,021 17,015 12,176 11,210 12,412 12.605 (2,111 12,135 VMS 11111 15,223 13,12 1),it 26 NEI OF OPERAIIOAS 116 111121 121 1752 1211 0S 1210 1236 1225 1120 1250 1221 1250 1244 1250 1225 921C GAP AND 600 OPEN EAFEMSL -J 21 heed Assets 10 112 114 127 11 120 120 120 120 120 120 (20 120 120 120 120 120 21 DIM Service 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 I 0 0 1 1 1 0 21 other Expense 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 4 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 II 30 All on 14V Ions 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 1 1 1 0 1 7 31 Enos in 4011i1A cap 1 1 4 I 0 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 ]2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 I 0 0 I 1 0 I I 31 501 AON apER [RP t0 112 114 127 11 120 $20 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 In 120 120 14 lot OF l Sol OF EAP 11.606 1005 11,115 11,945 12.021 0.105 12,191 12,210 12,452 12,625 62,131 VMS 12,910 13,101 13.243 13.431 0.611 .:'u: ilait It:ai its:-I tan I :u::: :u:r: itsm:1: Ia:a :a::t t::2:1 SIMI tuns: SIMI' I:1::1 M 35 All 94101110SS) 124 JIM) Ill 1225 1210 1225 1190 1214 1201 1200 1230 0201 1211 IJJO' 1250 1205 1110 It 12 :t Y1t :::::1 ruts: :::::I I:I IIS I III t:::u tut lain 1t IIit 1:2:I8 Intl: 40171 .x. 31 10111111 Al 1 1.501 1 1 11 35 S1 21 94 111 140 161 L% 717 260 lit 175 1141M All NEI 90WILISS) 117 1231 1466 1226 100 11,251 I1,351 11,113 12,243 12,616 13,112 11,471 11,143 14,465 141031 16 AEI:EIt CHO II fill WE, 2.511 1,11{ IS,SII 1.12% 4,14% o.sn mot 3.131 7.111 4.131 met 4. in ..301 0.171 s. In 0s1,, r it NEI 16Esal VALUE 11 M00 11,131 t }rr,' 40 NEI KlItN2 VALUE IN MS 11,631 ANON ,fa z , y,. t' 5 C ziyP vim... a' owl, (001INCIAL SOlll IAS71 MUM ~ 16:1520 CRPtC~U II 0 10091 Snnula 1 S ACIWI ACT* It IF If 11 fl II It I1 rl 11 11 It It Il 11 1919 1990 091 1991 1993 1994 1155 19% 1997 00 1911 2600 2001 2002 2005 2004 2005 l Wit ANNUM OOSIONERS 11,629 13102 12,120 11,466 12,114 11,171 11,111 11,191 11,261 1101} 10.122 10,605 10,31S 10,115 I,ID2 1,102 9,516 . 2 C01C Yards Coll6cled 1111115 179,251 111,030 18,390 5161123 011321 167,099 161,511 161,250 151,123 154,165 151,741 111,152 145,711 142,061 19,11% 131,116 I Avg cubic 141 3 Cull 11.01 12.99 14.31 16,51 14.11 14.31 14.11 19,31 11,31 NISI 11,11 14.31 14,11 1.11 14.11 L611 14111 4 AIR gill 1 Cost 11,71 100.41 115.55 111,59 123.71 121,11 132.59 101,23 142.14 141.14 156.59 161,62 112.1% 161.21 190.34 191,!6 201.15 f / 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 ! ! ! 1 1 1 1 0 1 d 0 f 0 1 I 1 0 1 ! 1 / 0 R(ItNOLS I Commercial Tait 11,311 11,96 11,470 11,491 11,5)2 1.534 {1.551 11,571 (3,600 11,64) 11,69S 11,744 11.191 11,116 11,100 11.15S 12,012 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 9 1 1 0 1 ! 1 ' e 6 I 1 0 1 0 1 e 1 0 1 e e ! ! 1 0 ~ 14 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 f 0 1 1 I 0 II S0170£Al • Cull 111 11,313 11,316 11,470 11,411 II,SI2 11,534 JIS% 11371 11300 11,617 11,05, 11,14 11,794 11,146 11,900 11,955 12,012 12 License fee 0 36 41 II 41 44 13 J 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 0 0 I IJ 1 1 / 1 ! 0 I 0 e I f e 1 1 1 1 1 II 0 I 1 0 9 0 0 0 1 1 / 1 1 1 0 ! !tr 15, 10101 WEIVII II1SIS 11,122 111511 1019 11,560 11,511 11.561 1t sal (1,641 11,641 111615 $1,144 11,194 11,116 WWI) 1119S% 11,111 t x ' pMNDI1VAt! 76 Payroll 1121 1374 IU1 180 IS01 1511 1511 1621 r'N 1611 1121 1111 (137 1900 1961 11,042 11,122 11,101 r ^ 11 supplies 41 51 55 is 76 11 16 91 91 104 711 I0 114 134 143 3S2 361 11 maintenance 125 111 154 149 ISO 161 110 114 200 224 261 Ito 271 Sol 124 361 37% I•;;,• 19 Services 129 61 136 f l 54 69 61 0 74 10 11 11 99 Not INS 324 113 21 loserance 20 0 11 23 24 25 J7 29 $1 S3 35 11 10 42 41 41 52 1 S'! 21 Sundry f 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 I 0 4 1 I ! ! 0 1 22 111 Debt A 1 1 6 1 1 4 1 7 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 23 Idnis irandlrs 0E 47 11 IT 10 71 17 I2 11 14 101 106 Its 121 12% 131 146 136 i!t 24 Adeln lransters Co. I I I 1 0 0 f I 1 1 1 1 6 6 6 1 0 I 4'r 25 Landfill t9penmm 430 $55 546 W 533 $23 511 502 IDS Ill 491 613 661 651 143 693 720 : 26 101441 ENPENS£1 It,263 11,339 It,401 31.449 01,432 11,190 11,539 11,6D1 11,717 11,911 17,060 12,141 12,242 12,365 12,457 12,643 12,111 j 27011 OPEN 103 130 ill 11S 10 1121 113 129 11221 111161 (1331) 115651 (1031 11441) 114992 (15511 116111 118011 CAP AND NON gall EtPINSI 21 fixed Assist 10 Ill 141 165 W 114 150 120 122 121 126 021 121 024 121 129 121 It gall Service 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 f 0 4 1 1 1 6 1 9 Other Expense I 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 o e 0 0 1 1 1 31 Rd on Im Trans I o 1 f / 0 1 0 A 6 6 I 0 4 1 1 1 ' 31 Incr in Nothing UP I I I 1 1 0 1 1 0 f 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 is 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 A 1 0 1 0 1 I 1 1 34 101 000 COLA LNP 0 111 01 y} f15 131 ISO 120 122 124 121 121 121 121 121 621 101 35 111 OPLRINDN OPEN UP 11,213 11,150 11,414 11,514 11,441 11,524 11,519 I1 623 11,101 12,005 12,066 12,115 11,270 12.375 , 12,115 12,619 11,141 11:1:• Miss. sWit 9::111 r:•:et 11 11:::: :•r.:: r:::8 mitt tt:l:: rubs 1:6::x 9::111 tau.: will t11112 36 NET CAMIloS11 130 18 124 125 (III 151 WO 1101 (12011 (IJS1I 113911 114111 Isd41 IIS21) . (ISIS) (11151 (1129) ry ,S 1111:1 grit 1:7:11 Will sal II 9:11:1 a11,i tart ..:::1 :11:19 9::111 11111: :lent to:Ctt 115th :11191 21 112 T ' 11 PERCENT CH 10 NIN IllE 11.90% IS.021 1.So% 3.501 I'M trot 1.501 3.53 Ski 1.001 ma 5.606 1.001 1.01 5.011 Lki {e p 1 Va. s 1 ' a IANOFiII FROMM . . fit 10001 .4 14:45:21 ' CRD-LC't( ACIUAI RIVAL FY FT to Fr Fl Il FT F1 IV Fl it FI fl It ft f kmMr14 S 1949 It" 1191 1999 1915 1191 2995 1991 1911 1191 1999 2000 2001 2002 2001 2001 }OOS yy. l to AH. 11,031 19,121 71,191 79,05 10,510 11,119 13,750 13,135 11,015 10,313 12,670 13,019 91,570 1401111 301,730 105 .411 101.142 7 [t t6al• 191,795 IN,2S2 MAD 111,310 174,122 171,116 11),199 161,541 161.750 151,125 154,Us 151,761 141,112 64 IS7 142,142 131,115 111,116 I 1 CF cash 30,751 21.104 21,912 29,110 21,134 29,771 30,192 11,231 12,015 72,111 J7, 139 34,624 3S,S24 36,151 31,402 31,371 21,310 - ' 4 CT cont. $1,195 61,141 69,111 it. 114 70,115 11311 11. 192 11,61) 14,511 71,591 10,60 12,150 14,109 17326 19,4 D0 91,133 44,111 S Cl OtMt 2,203 11966 1,116 2,001 2,021 1,053 2,102 2,155 2,201 2,247 1,374 1.311 2,441 2,513 1,519 2,616 1,115 4 I lot it 365,015 351,004 361,440 159,041 154,161 354,099 351,18 351,41 360,114 362,010 364,10 $66,113 161,315 321,161 MASS 371,164 341,511 I Cub. Cl 2,134,925 2,500,000 2,161,640 3,210,612 11571,54) 1,933.646 1,290,111 1,449,250 S, 001, StS 51171.445 5, I IS, 694 I, II I, 543 1,471,431 6,143,151 1,111,404 1,591,551 11171,129 i PEVENU(S I Contract tell 121 21S 201 276 712 24) 251 251 $61 313 303 Jos 03 414 425 511 SIN 9 us* fees at 11 17 9S 101 11 205 101 ISS ISf 160 164 111 113 Ill 211 213 10 Other Foes S 1 i 7 2 1 1 1 10 11 21 it 1} 11 If IS 11 It All real 196 245 211 210 20 249 255 261 330 06 417 429 41 451 463 122 541 II Cool Fees 430 553 544 13S 513 523 $12 Sol 605 Ill 197 its 161 654 NS 401 111 11 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 6 a 1 I I 1 0 1US1OlA5'ACNS 1121 11,101 11,015 111302 11,129 11,127 11,131 11,131 11,441 11,451 11,661 11,410 11,692 11,105. 11,721 1J.45 12,139 14 I 0 0 0 0 / 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 ,I 1 1 1 13 0 1 / 9 a 0 0 1 0 1 0 / 1 1 1 1 ~ • 16 701 010 1321 (1,101 11,015 11.102 11,121 11,121 11,131 01,931 (1,461 11,651 11,661 11,610 11,192 11,705 11,120 11.165 12,111 E NPEODIFUAE3 11 Payroll 0223 1271 120 1271 0294 131$ 1136 1367 (319 1411 1450 Ills 1521 1561 1601 1150 1691 ' 11 supplies 23 54 ol 41 59 SO 54 S) 41 65 69 74 79 14 11 1S .102 . ` 11 P11e1 Ise 232 131 Ise 110 Ili 195 210 126 213 362 212 305 124 353 371 101 201errlcts I!I 301 312 02 767 144 157 169 lit its 210 216 20 262 212 303 121 1 71 16S 1 10 10 20 21 22 24 25 77 21 SO J2 $1 11 31 42 4S i 22 salary 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 1 1 0 / 1 1E 73 114 Debt I 3 1 I 1 I I 3 I l 1 1 1 3 1 I } 24 Admits Innslus 00 21 34 21 30 32 14 36 31 41 43 46 41 52 54 51 63 61 : 25 AMA homFlre CC 0 1 O 0 D 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 f 1 24 Ednl It / 0 4 0 0 0 0 / 0 f 0 0 0 1 1 0 / i''. II 10641 UP .,.1566 1110 1111 1705 1044 1707 seal 1362 1924 1995 (1,149 11,141 11,M 11,321 11,426 11,533 11,641 21 *IT OPEN 0ENENU(1 (255 1199 (171 1397 (215 1310 1571 121 1535 1663 1599 IS31 1451 1311 1294 IlSS 1412 CAP AND ACN OPEN (NHNSE (,T 29 Pixed Attits 10 s0 s0 10 16 115 t0 is 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 14 10 30le0t Son 261 Ill 202 193 Ile 11 164 160 Ise 654 1St bl 656 aS4 651 076 Ill 11 Debt 1. F4 1 0 1 100 100 100 100 100 0 1 0 f 0 I 1 1 SI 33 lit an Foe Will 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 / / 0 0 1 0 1' I 1 1 IS Inc Is talk tap 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 a 34 Deal oil 0 1 IS 45 45 41 as 45 0 0 1 I 1 1 f 1 15 101 NON Pit UP 1262 1211 1211 1111 1334 fill 1509 1311 1616 1656 $6k 1656 1651 list I/S4 16% 11.611 )1 101 OPENlNON vim ENP let 1,111 1,063 11043 1,110 1,041 1,112 1,173 I,S12 1.6SI 1,)25 .1,50t 1.191 1'"1 2112 . 1,I11 2065 Y tsar: 11rta :::::e :ta:r ::t::t tntt: r:91:1 ::U i:::1I :tact :t:::I !nisi Lrtti 111111 ; rtrt.e ttitt{ tittle ' . p, 31011OAIN!(1OS61 111) (1171 124 09 (1511 141 119 11361 (11111 11 (151) (31111 (1199) 1071) (116}I IN21! IISaI' null I:Itis 11:1u rule rr.:a n:at :::as r.:ue Ia:u .:::a t::t:: an1l rolri Ilan'-silent irii:t utt:t" il ISO 31 LAAOFIII At 2.230 1,011 3.600 3,000 1.050 1.050 LOU 1.030 1150 4,500 4,504 4.500 4300 4.501 I,SOII `1., 1,251' ~ ¢ It01Yl I AENI IV 1ANDFitt Of 1.750 3.100 1.000 1.251 3,450 1.450 1.40 3,450 4.FS0 4.150 6,750 1.750 1,130 1.151 clu 5,650 1 250 1.► ; e k lCON1,dSA,011 , SOLID WASTE RESIDENTIAL RATES (3) SCENARIO RATE COMPARISONS r' I 22 21 2r` 20 19 iB I 17, m 16 15 , © 14 13 12 } ;R 10 •.r S 9 91 92 93 94 95 98 87 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 S, rrt Deo LF Expand o Exclusive ■ Status Quo + Corr x Y r d i 4 P4` [ ~ 1'. { oaf W" I ' e f 1 :r 1. ANNUAL NET GAIN/ LOSS) (3) SCENARIO RATE COMPARISONS 400 350 300 t 250 W 200 r Z D i. JE 150 ~ I Z 100 50 rv 0 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 w (z f P ■ Status Quo + Comm Dec LF Expand o Exduslve ' a a o{.1I is x. b; + f i I CUMULATIVE NET GAIN/(LOSS) (3) SCENARIO RATE COMPARISONS 6 5 .fir r ~ 4 a 12+ , t7 v 1 f' _ ate. ul O g E .r S (h T 1 ry .tip. 2 r`. 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 0i 02 03 04 05 Exdu*,o o ■ Status Quo + Comm Dec LF Expend y .w r l i 3064L/42691 i ORDINANCE NO. f AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 5-3 AND 5-5 OF ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS (BUILD- INGS) TO PROVIDE FOR AMENDMENTS TO THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE; RE- QUIRING THAT AUTOMATIC. SPRINKLER SYSTEMS BE INSTALLED IN CERTAIN BUILDINGS; AMENDING ARTICLE 4.07(E) OF APPENDIX A OF THE CODE OF r ORDINANCES TO PROVIDE FOR REDUCTION IN THE FIRE PROTECTION WATER f. CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES; PROVIDING EXEMP- TIONS FROM CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE IN GROUP A, DIVISION 3 and 4, GROUP B AND GROUP R OCCUPANCIES WHERE SUCH BUILDINGS ARE EQUIPPED WITH AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS; RE- I PEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR A MAXI- MUM PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,000 THEREFOR FOR VIOLATIONS OF ~r SECTIONS I, III AND '.V; PROVIDING A MAXIMUM PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $500 FOR VIOLATIONS OF SECTION II THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended the following regu- lations to govern conditions hazardous to life and property re- salting from fire and explosion within the Citg to protect public safety, health and welfare of its citizens; and y WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held in accordance with the requirements of law; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: o~y SECTION I. That Section 5-3 (Deletions and Amendments) of Artic e o hapter 5 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas is herebyy amended by adding subsections to be num- bered (21) trough (30), which said subsections shall read as k; follows: j Sec. 5-3. Deletions and Amendments. r (21) Section 3802, Automatic Fire Extinguishing Systems, is amended to read as follows: (a) An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in the occuppancies and locations set forth in this sec- tion. A11 such installations shall be in accordance with N.F.P,A, Standard 139 N.F.P,A. Standard 13A, N.F.P.A. Standard 13D, N.F.P.A. Standard 140 and the e ; Supplemental Sprinkler Rules of the State Board of i S Insurance, as the same may be amended or supple- mented from time to time. (b) An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed: 1. In sll buildings constructed after June 1, 1991 of noncombustible construction, having 10,000 or ( 4 more square feet of total floor area, regardless of type of construction, height, area separation walls, exterior wall openings, or occupancy group. 2. In all buildings constructed afta c June 1, 1991, ' of combustible construction having 5,000 or more - square feet of total floor area regardless of type of construction, height, area separation walls, exterior wall openings, or occupancy group. Exceptions. 1. Where the heated and the cooled areas of a single family dwelling are less than 5,000 square feet, the floor areas which are not heated or cooled may be omitted from floor area calcula- tions used to determine whether an automatic sprinkler system is required. Such areas which a'. are not heated or cooled must be separated from heated or cooled areas of the dwelling by minimum one-hour fire-resistive construction which ex- tends from the lowest floor level to the roof deck. Any openings within such separation shall be protected by minimum one-hour fire assemblies. 2. Apartment buildings and two family dwellings' having 5,000 square feet or more of floor area , need not be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system, provided such buildings are separated into areas of less than 5,000 square feet by vertical, four-hour, fire-resistive, non-load bearing walls. Such walls shall have l no penetration and shall extend from the founda- tion to a point at least 30 inches above the roof and shall extend to the outer edges of horizon- tal projecting elements such as balconies, roof overhangs, canopies or architectural projections. (3) In all basements constructed after June 1, 1991, regardless of size, construction type, or occu- pancy group except in Group R, Division 3 Occu- pancies. ;r ` j Page 2 { I i (4) In the following Group H Occupancies: i (a) Division 1. An automatic fire-extinguishing „ system shall be installed in buildings clas- sified as Group H, Division 1 Occupancy lar- ger than 1500 square feet in floor area. (b) Division 2. An automatic fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in Group H, Divi- sion 2 Occupancies exceeding 1500 square feet in area. An automatic fire-extin uishing system shall be installed in rooms of buildings classified as Group H, Division 2 Occupancies when flammable or combustible liquids are stored or handled in excess of the quantities set i forth in Table No. 9-A, of the Uniform Building Code, or any combination of flam- mable liquids exceeds 240 gallons. An automatic fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in paint spray booths or rooms. (c) Division 3. An automatic fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in buildings clas- sified as Group H, Division 3 Occupancies k. larger than 3,000 square feet in floor area. (d) Division 4. M automatic fire•extinguithing system shall be installed in buildings elas- sified as Group H, Division 4 Occupancies more than one story in height. (e) Division 6. An automatic fire-extinguishing l system shall be installed throughout build- ings containing Group H, Divisioi, ( Occupan- cies. (5) In all Group I Occupancies. (6) The owner(s) of any building which existed or ' which was under construction, or of any site for which a building permit had been issued prior to June 1, 1991 shall be required to install an automatic fire sprinkler system at such time as the owner(s) constructs an addition or enlargement to the building if: (a) the total square footage of such addition, when combined with the total square footage a of all previous additions and enlargements r- ! Page 3 to the building constructed after June 1, 1991, cause the building to exceed 10,000 square feet of total floor area; and (b) the total square footage of all such addi- tions to the building exceeds by more than twenty-five (25X) the total floor area which existed, or which was under construction, or for which a building permit was issued prior to June 1, 1991. Additions required to comply with the pro- visions of laws or ordinances containing health, or safety regulations enacted after S.. June 1, 1991, shall not be counted in calcu- lating the footage under this section. (c) All persons wishing to install automatic sprinkler or standpipe systems within the city limits of the City of Denton shall furnish proof to the Fire Mar- shal prior to the beginning of any work that such k persona meet or exceed all state and local require- ments for sprinkler installers. (1) At least two (2) copies of working drawings shall be furnished at the time of application for a building permit. No building permit shall be issued unless the plane for the automatic fire sprinkler or standpipe system have been approved. However, the building official may issue a permit for the preparation or construction of a founds- b. tion and associated underground pplumbing, and electrical work prior to receipt of the working drawings. ; i (2) A temporary Certificate of occupancy may be is- - , sued if the fire sprinkler system is operational and has been a roved by the Fire Marshal. A permanent Certificate of Occupancy shall be ie- aued only after at least two sets of as-built drawings and hydraulic calculations are submit- ted to the Fire Marshal for final approval. If rate credit is to be received, these copies shall include the stamped approval of the State Hoard of Insurance. The temporary Certificate of oc- cupancy shall be valid for a period not to exceed one-hundred and twenty (120) days from the date j of issuance and any corrections to the fire sprinkler system which are required by the State Board of Insurance shall be completed within the 4 one-hundred twenty (120) period for which the temporary Certificate of Occupancy is valid. Page 4 I (3) A representative of the Fire Department shall witness all pressure tests of systems- The con- ; tractor's responsible managing employee must be present at all acceptance teats. (d) No alterations to eyetema or to buildings having ap- ` proved systems shall be made prior to submittal and ; approval of plans for such alterations or additions. (e) All riser control valves shall be able to be locked in i, an open position and shall be maintained at all times in i the locked, open position unless otherwise approved by the Fire Marshal. (f) All connections to the City's main shall be designed in } accordance with figure B-2-3.1, Connection for Domestic 1 Water, N.F.P.A. 13, except that an approved check valve to the domestic water underground yard main near its shall be connection required co 3 (22) Section 3804, Permissible Sprinkler Omissions, is hereby amended to read as follows: 3804. Exceptions. (a) Subject to the approval of the Fire Marshal, sprin- klers may be omitted in rooms or areas when the ap- plication threat to life or the fie contents hazard. constitute a a (b) Group R, Divisions 1 (except hotels and motels) and 3 shall be permitted to install N.F.P.A. Standard 13D systems. (23) Section 3805, Standpipes, is hereby amended to read as 4 follows: { 9 3805. Standpipes. t (a) Standpipea shall comply with the requirements of s N.F.P.A. Standard 14, latest edition. (b) A Class III standpipe shall be required in all build- ings three (3) or more stories in height. In build- ings equipped with automatic cabinets p e sprinkler waivede requirement of hose and ho may , if approved by the Fire Marshal. (24) Section 3305(8), is amended by adding Exception No. 7 i which shall read as follows: 1 Page 5- t I ~ I r 7. Corridor walls-416nd ceilings need not be of fire- resistive construction within buildings of Group A, r Divisions 3 and 4, Group B and Group R Occupancies I which are equipped with an automatic sprinkler system throughout. (25) Section 3305(h)(1), is amended by adding Exception No. 3 which shall read as follows: 3. Self-closing or automatic closing smoke and draft control assembles need not be installed in buildings f of Group A, Divisions 3 and 4, Group B and Group R Occupancies which are equipped with an automatic sprinkler system throughout. R (26) Section 3305(h)(2), is amended by adding Exception No. 2 which shall read as follows: 2. Protection of openings as required by this section is not required in Group A, Division 3 and 4, Group B and Group R Occupancies which are equipped with an automatic sprinkler system throughout. i (27) Section 4306(j)5, is amended by adding an exception which shall read as follows: Exception. Fire damper protection of heating, vents lation and air conditioning duct penetrations of cor- ridor wallet ceilings or floors is not required in Group A, Division 3 and 4, Group B and Group R Occu- pancies which are equipped with an automatic sprinkler system throughout. h (28) Section 2516(f)(2), is amended by adding Exception 2 which shall read as follows: 2. Firestops may be omitted in combustible attic ' space in Group A, Division 3 and 40 Group B and Group R Occupancies which are equipped with an automatic sprinkler system throughout. (29) Section 4204(a), is amended by adding Exception No. 4 which shall read as follows: r 4. Where approved automatic sprinkler protection is provided in Group At Division 3 and 4, Group B and Group R Occupancies, the flame-spread classification rating may be reduced to Class Ili. (30) Section 504(b) is amended by adding a new sentence thereto which e611 read as follows: R Page 6 . , C ,mac. a. € il,. MAI i The above provisions shall not apply to Group A, Divisions 3 and 4, Group B and Group R Occupancies which are equiped auto- matic sprinkler system throughout and e a att leastatenofeet from the property line. SECTION II. That Article I of Chapter 5 of the Code of Ordi- nances , or the s ito bof Denton, e numbered Texas* is 5-5 Banda5-6aewhichashall ~ 2 now read as follows: ~1 Sec. 5-5. Water Capacity. fire If sufficient water supplies exist satisf Ina ranee autaticServices sprinkler demands as calculated by the Office Fireflow Formula as amended, the minimum bet escaped ity ; required by Article 4.67(E) of Appendix A may rc by fifty percent (50x), except that in no case shall the minimum capacity be reduced to less than 500 gallons per minute. SECTION III. That Article I of Chapter 5 of the Code of Ordi- nance o the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby amended by adding a new section, to be numbered section 5-6, which shall read as follows: Sec. 5-6. Violations. A person commits an offense if the ` s, person: (a) Tampere with, damages or renders inoperable an automatic sprinkler system, standpipe, or alarm device. standi? or Chief of ithes Fire system pprovals from theautomatic (b) wShuts off a ithout prior a partment. SECTION IV. That article 4.07(E) of Article III of Appendix A o E e o e of Ordinances is amended to read as follows- 4.01(de a e irate w tent capRascutqredor fira protection purposes. Unless bui binmeane of sutomaticrospnrinkler systems int accor- protection y dance with Chapter 5 of the Code of Ordinances, each develop- went shall provide the following minimum water capacity (Cal- culated with 20 pounds of residual pressure), G.P.N. Area ' 3,000 High-intensity commercial and industrial 1, 500 Medium-intensity commercial Page 7 r' t PSI 2 ``r1 r I` I Medium-intensity residential 750 Low-intensity residential 500 SECTION V. That section 10-63 of the Code of ordinances is „y hereby amen Ted to read as follows: section 10-63. Extent. (a) The fire lane shall be extended to within fifty feet (50') of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building. For buildings which are eggipped with an auto- matic sprinkler system throughout, the fire lane shall extend to within fifty feet of the fire department hoes, connection. SECTION VI. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, except Section IV, or shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000). Any person who shall violate Section IV of this ordinance or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereof, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding Five Hundred Dollars ($500). Each such person shall be deemed guilty offense for of a during separat violation each thise ordinance e ny o is committed, eor continued, and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be punished within the limits above. SECTION VII. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, c ause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the vaw lidity of the remaining portions of this ordinance and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. i SECTION VIII. That the repeal of any ordinance or any portion thereby the preceding sections shall not affect or impair any act done or right vested or accrued or any proceeding, suit or prosecution had or commenced in any cause before such repeal shall take effect; but every such act done, or right vested or accrued, or proceedings, suit or prosecution had or commenced shall remain if such force in full part and theeffect reof so to reall intents or pealed had remained in s force ordinance or part thereof so repealed had remained in force, SECTION IX. That this ordinance shall become effective June 1, 1 , an a City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton i Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. . y } Page 8 4 jj + PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 19916 r i .AF If }1 f~ r ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERSj CITY SECRETARY ; r K ~ y I ,°s 1' iu~ I APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY fit.. BY: I ~I Y . r Y , 1 5 I Page 9 I 7r7- ` I I Cirrof DENTOMIX" MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 10201 / TELEPHONE X017) 8Ae 8907 K ONke of the City Moftoper 3 ' A. MEMORANDUM q T0. The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council "'3r. ,~Py • PROM; Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager s y DATE: April 25. 1991 SUBJECT: Space Plan Contract I Attached is the contract frith Corgan Associates Architects to ' ` v do the space plan study for the City of Denton. The consultant will do a comprehensive study of all of our buildings including A the Moore building and will help us project what our needs are in the future. The funding comes from both the general fund and the utility fund, our team of staff people have negotiated ;I a very good contract for us and we would recommend it to you. 1 ti: You will note that the contract has not been signed. Ns t,614. you we were trying to fast -track this itead since it. C finished late this week, we have included It in your packet; in I case you have questions. it is our plan to bring you,a signed document for the council meeting Tuesday night, If we do ttbt. have it signed by Tueaday evening, we will ask for the ea to be pulled, t If the council has questions we will be happy to try and answer .y , theft at your convenience. Rick sveh a Deputy City Manager t r E , ! RStcb hr. ' ~ 5319M ~.rr "I 1 r s{ 1 , t , ,fix , I r i ~b a wv~ "Owl . corq+ryro I ORDINANCE N0. AGREEMENT BETWEEN 1 TO EXECUTE n t CHITECTS ~tELATING TO AND COI EVALUATE ~.SSOCIATES AR E AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING H E LUATE THE ITCILITI 3 i AUTH RIZING ' J THE CITY OF DSERVICES AND TO FOR CITY FA EFFECTIVE PROFESSIONAL E Mp,STER PLAN PROVIDING AN } A LONG RPOF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND 1 DEVELOP THE EXP ENDITURE a; fix; DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENPON HEREBY ORDAINS. Mayor authorized to execute an agree- is to 'A, That the an Assoc iates Archi®e~~etdY of Denton a nd Corg a Yong rang went bets w~the City space needs and develop luate the City s the terms and conditions contained ies under and hereto. ~ eva it " is attached t f ch i agreement► acit a copy of which authorizes the ex- 4 inatheo City Council hereby Y. That the City the agreement. penditureof as at thiseo dinance shall become affective That roval. i~uc IO u ton its passage and app day ► . +'Y C ediatelY p o 1991 f ' PASSED AND APPROVED this the > MAYOR BOB CAST LEBERRY► ATTEST; CITY SECRETARY JENNIFER WALTERS► l BYI a. 2GA D APPROVED AS TO 1 EBRA A. DRAYOVITCHL CITYA'1TOEY 5 BY , aL xr .::iii Aa are '.n F,i a."'1: . fir. t ry 49122Apr1L 26, 1991 hV i CONTRACT BETWEEN CITY OF DENTON AND CORGAN ASSOCIATES FOR PROFESSIONAL PLANNING SERVICES THIS CONTRACT is made between the City of Denton (the city), a municipal corporation of the State of Texas, and Corgan Associates " Architects (Architect) with offices located at 501 Elm Street, Suite 500, Dallas, Texas, 75202. P. Recitals In order to plan for the future needs of the City and to insure that public funds for acquiring, maintaining, and using City build- ings and facilities are used in the most efficient and cost effac- tive manner, the City has solicited proposals for professional tiu services to evaluate the City's space needs and develop a long range master plan for City facilities. After careful review of the proposals submitted, the City wishes to engage Architect to provide the professional space and master plan services. Agreement y' i ' In consideration of the recitals and the terms of this Agree- ment, the City and Architect agree as follows: ARTICLE I.. ARCHITECT'S SERVICES i A. The Architect will perform the following services for the., #ry City: 1. Inventory existing buildings and facilities; 1 p 2. Identify existing constraints; and thifuture s informationel and 9. Develo a 15 year ty requirements forecast and with of facili (a) Develop a list of needs for future space require- ments; r (b) Develop recommendations for the future use of exist- ing facilities; (c) Propose new facilities determined to be necessary; (d) Recommend renovation or repairs to existing avail- able buildings necessary to render them serviceable i to meet the master plan's designated use; (e) Provide a phasing plan and interim facilities plan while renovation and construction is underway, and; (f) Develop a relocation plan for staff proposed to be reassigned to a different location. K, B. The basic services shall include the services, objectives, and methods of performance as shown in the Proposed Management Work Plan, attached as Exhibit A. In developing recommendations, all city departments and buildings listed in the Request for Proposals , a shall be considered. ; C. The Architect may retain other consultants to perform part of the services, but the consultants used shall be subject to prior approval by the city's Project Representative. ' t ~t D. No additional services or changes in the scope of the services are authorized to be performed by Architect under this Agreement, unless first approved by the City in A written Addendum }d, to this Agreement. E. Architect will provide three (3) copies of the Interim Phase reports and the three (3) final Program and Master Plan reports.' Architect shall supply additional copies as requested by the city upon payment of the Architect's cost to print or reproduce the reports. ; ARTICLE Ii. TIME OF PERFORMANCE A. The Architect shall endeavor to complete all work by Septem- ber 10, 1991. ARTICLE III. w, CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES s A. The City shall appoint a Project Representative to provide information, arrange interviews and meetings, provide space and arrange for on -site work and inspections, and otherwise assiht an¢ cooperate with Architect in the performance of the work to be performed under this Agreement. E 8. The City shall provide the Architect with the following informations 1. General population forecast. 2. Utility customer forecasts. f` n PAGE 2 yr i i t 3. Demographic data for specialized functions, including police and jail functions. 4. Available drawings of existing buildings. 5. Topography of proposed sites. 6. Building related codes. 7. Master plans for various departments. 8. Existing financial resources. f r A 1 t y H ARTICLE IV. COMPENSATION r' A. City shall compensate Architect for the professional ser- vices provided at an hourly rate, and in no case shall the Archi- tect bill the City nor shall the City be liable to Architect, including any consultants, agents or subcontractors of Architect, for more than seventy two thousand five hundred dollars ($72,500) for all services required to be provided under this Agreement. t City shall not pay Architect's expenses. 'd B, The hourly rate for Architect's services, including the services of any professional consultants engaged by Architect, shall be as follows: Principal $95.00 Space Planner $45.00 Y y Associate $75.00 Intern Architect $45.00 Architect $55.00 C. Architect may bill the City for hours expended every month, beginning thirty days after the Architect begins the work and the city shall endeavor to pay the Architect promptly within thirty days of receiving an invoice. However, the City shall have no obligation to pay more than ninety percent (901) of the total Contract price to Architect through monthly invoices, until Architect has completed all services performed under this Agree- ment. ARTICLE V. TERMINATION, DEFAULT, AND FORCE MAJEURE A. Should Architect fail to substantially perform or fulfill any requirement of this Agreement, the City may suspend further payment of funds due to Architect until Architect complies with the requirement or if refuses to perform or complete any requirement of the Agreement or a portion thereof within thirty days after receiving written notice of the City of the default, the City may PAGE 3 5 I am terminate this Agreement by sending written notice of termination. If the city terminates this Agreement, Architect shall not be entitled to any payment after the date the City sends notice of default and the City may engage another person to complete the services provided for in this Agreement without further liability I to Architect. { B. The City shall not be required to pay for any services which are unsatisfactory as determined by the Project Representative or j which is not performed in compliance with the terms of this r i contract. < J C. Neither City nor Architect shall be deemed in violation of a 1 this Contract if it is prevented from performing any of its obli- gations hereunder by reasons for which it is not responsible or circumstances beyond its control. ARTICLE VI. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS' All Architect's designs and work product under this Contract including, but not limited to, tracings, drawings, estimates, specifications, investigations, studies, and other documents, completed or partially completed, shall be the property of the City upon delivery to the City and architect specifically waives and releases any proprietary rights or claims therein. Copies may be retained by Architect. a' 0 ARTICLE VII. TERM f Unless sooner terminated in accordance with this Contract, the term of this Contract shall be from the date of execution until completion of the services. ARTICLE VIII. i GENERAL PROVISIONS This Contract shall be administered on A. Administrat behalf of the City by its designated Project Representative. Architect shall fully comply with all reasonable instructions from the Project Representative. B. Insura_nce.. Architect shall purchase and maintain at its expense the following minimum insurance coverage during the term of this Contracts 1. Worker's Compens on as required by law. PAGE 4 i .i r ' i _ i der _ gyp. • Wool a ri`] 2, ~~~raheng~ ~enArAt Liabil tv Insurance for liability for injury or death of City's employees and third parties and for damage to city's existing property and the property of third parties, with the minimum limits for each occurrence of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000). 3. Where Architect intends to use motor vehicles at the job site, Creh a Automobile and Truck Li bility insur-, ance, covering owned, hired and nonownod vehicles, with the minimum limits of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. C. Assignment. Architect shall not assign, sublet or transfer any interest in this Contract without the prior written authoriza-10 tion of the City. p, Taxes. Architect will pay all taxes, if any, required by fffl law arising by virtue of the services performed hereunder, } City is qualified for exemption pursuant to the provisions of Article 20.04 (H) of the Texas Limited Sales, Excise and Use Tax Act. t E. min-discrimination. Architect will not discriminate in the treatment or employment of any individual or group of individuals on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, or physical handicap unrelated to job performance, either directly, indirectly or through contractual or other arrangements in the performance of this Agreement. ; F. Venue. if legal action is necessary by either Party with respect to the enforcement of any or all of the terms of conditions j herein, exclusive venue for same shall lie in Denton County, Texaa* jV- 0. Notices, All notices and correspondence to the City by l Architect shall be mailed or delivered as follows j City of Denton Attention: Tom Shaw 901-B Texas Street Denton, Texas 76201-4354 All notices and correspondence from the City shall be mailed or delivered to the Architect a:i follows: I Corgan Associates Attention: Brent Byers, Principal 501 Elm Street, Suite 500 ` Dallas, Texas 75202 PAGE 5 4 ~ ' FY i H,nanci°1 Interest Prohibited. Architect covenants and 4 represents that Architect, its officers, employees, agents, consultants, and subcontractors will have no financial interest, direct or indirect, in any work or the purchase or sale of any product, materials, or equipment Architect recommends to be performed or acquired by the City in the final report. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Contract r I this day of r 1491. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS d P,Y t 4. LIAYD V. HARRELL CITY MANAGER 11 I . I r x d, ATTESTS ? 3ENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY F BYt : APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS t DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY` : BY, ' i it I ITLCT3' CORGAN ASSOCIATES ARCH s y ! lei yl BI-NT BYEt, PRINCIPAL 1 r ' PAGE 6 i a 1 . burr EXHIBIT A Proposed Management Work Plan Denton 15 Year City Building Facilities i Space/Master Planning The management plan will involve four main objectives: 1. Development of City standards 2. Analysis of existing department spaces and 15 year forecasted requirements 3. Evaluation of existing facilities (including recommended renovations, repairs, etc.) ! ' 4. 'The overall master plan (alternative and final recommended plan) The following describes In detail the proposed work plan to accomplish these objectives. The following is our proposed preliminary work plan for the City of Denton building facilities. Prior to commencement of this management plan, we propose the review of this plan with the City and a confirmation that it meets the stated City concerns : and obectives. lk. 1. Orientation Meeting: Meet with City of Denton Project Representatives to Introduce all team members, discuss project procedures, establish ground rules, define Information needed from the City, develop the schedule, confirm and review the available documents the City has on existing facilities and verify the 4f end documents to be developed as part of the project. Products Memorandum and data sheets outlining procedures, project directories, schedules and outline of final document deliverables. Approval: Secure City of Denton approval of procedures and deliverables. 2. Office/Space Standards: Review r nd compare existing City of Denton space planning standards against known City/Government Industry standards. Also, compare these standards with those used In other projects for our clients such as Dallas County American Airlines, IBM, Federal Home Loan Bank, Southwestern 11e11 Telephone, and Dean Witter Reynolds. (An example of these standards we have assisted in development of are Included In the Appendix.) Aid Denton In adopting and/or clarifying standards for appropriateness, completeness and uniformity. Confirm that these space planning standards are to be used in developing future City department needa. I yl 1 ~ i , J. ..Y nn..G 4.. _ rn .fir.. u ` Y E t As a minimum, the following standards will be studied as part of this process. A. Private offices 1. Elected and appointed officials 2. Grade levels required to have a private office 3. Standard sizes for private offices 4. Support space for private offices ' B. Open office plan: Workstation standards and concept 1. Grade level 2, Sizes per grade level CY Conference rooms , 1Y Standard of employees per conference room 2Y Sizes of conference rooms 3. Special needs justifying conference rooms D. Special functions 1r Court rooms and support spaces ' 2. Record storage/keeping areas 3. Service (customer) counters and support spaces E. Support spaces` r 1. Reception/waiting areas 2. Break areas F 3. File areas 1 a. Open b. Closed c. Security areas i 4. Storagge areas a. O en using storage cabinets b. Closed cY Security areas S. Copier rooms i 6Y Computer areas and any other special requirements F. Electrical and telephone data cable outlet requirements for each area 3 reviewed in the standards. Electrical and telephone/data cable distribution within the building should be studied as a separate item Products Prepare a "Standards" document that would define and illustrate the City of Denton space planning standards. a ' Approvals Secure City of Denton approval of the "Standards". i r . Bj r . s ~ 1 " 3. Space Programming Statements Review and/or help the City develop a "programming statement" describing the visual image to be developed and proected by completed facilities interiors, space concepts to be utilized, and the des i red materials/finishes to be used in future City of Denton facilities and i renovations. Review various space planning concepts to determine the most feasible and economical alternatives for City of Denton. The following items as a minimum should be included In this statement: A. Definition of the visual image to be projected by the facility to the-users and citizens of Denton. Ala - ; B. Planning concepts and guidelines to be used in the development of space plans for City of Denton facilities. C. Desirable materials and finishes to be used for maintenance, durability, compatibility and consistency of all City facilities. (Suggestion: meet with designated maintenance personnel for Information gathering concerning maintainability.) D. Desirable technical details (such as preferred telephone/data cable distribution within the facility, eta) Products Pamphlet outlining image, materials, visual impact, ctc. I Approval: Secure City of Denton approval of image and materials usage, 4. Depart ment/Croup/Facility Space Requiremento Validate the space planning requirements for each department/group in the pro ect by reviewing current Information from the City Project Representatives, ].including existing floor plans) development and distribution of space plannin questionnaire for each department, group, etc., acquiring additional Information from meetings with the departments/groups and visits to the existing facilities. A. Secure and review organization charts for each department/group Included In the project scope. B. Secure all headcount projections through the projected master planning period for each depart ment/group included In the project.. i C. Confirm that the previous]. appproved City of Denton Space Planning Standards (outlined earlfer~ will apply to each group in the project. Define any areas where the Standards w^., not apply. z D. Distribute custom developed questionnaire to all departments, groups, etc., to be included In master planning. 1 14f a.,. t . ' j E. Discuss and complete Space Planning Questionnaire during visit to each department/group. Confirm fifteen year staff headcount projections. Develop support space requirements, Determine adjacency requirements for most efficient operation. F. Develop computerized data base format for each department/group in the project including headcounts and square footage requirements. (example included with this proposal) „ G. As available, review and input existing square footage allocations into the Strategic Planning Data Base. s , H. Confirm the actual "available" square footage in all City of Denton f: facilities that are to be included in this project study. 1. Compare space requests identified by the departments/groups in the Ey Questionnaire with the new City Space Planning Standards. Reconcile and, validate all differences with the appropriate designated Representative. Input all new and additional validated information into the Data Base including space needs per year. U Product: Strategic Planning Data Base loaded and space requirements ;n determined, incorporating standards. Approval: Secure City Project Representative approval of each departmental/group space requirements. t' The "Standards" document, materials and image pamphlet as well as the Department/Group/Facility Space Requirements would be included as part of the programming requirements for future City facilities and renovations. 5. Facility Space Requirements Reports Develop a Facility Space Requirements report including the following: ` A. After validating space requirements for each department //grouppstudied, develop a composite total of facility space requirements including the projection or definition of department space needs for the planning period. B. requirements with available space in City Comparison facility space p of Denton facilities. C, Comparison of departmental group adjacency requirements with existing E conditions. Consider desired adjacnciles In development of overall plans. ; ^ i r 1 A i N i Products Preliminary recommendations on space (square footage) requirements and adjacencies in existing facilities and possible new facilities. Approvals: Secure City of Denton Project Representative approval of the report. 6. Economic and operational analysis of each City of Denton facility for its continued use. All options would be studied, including using facilities "as is - renovating facilities, adding onto existing facilities, vacating any existing facilities and the construction of any new proposed facilities. A. Evaluate existing facilities based on: Area and configuration of existing floors/efficiency, Open Space, Public Space Structural implications Building and fire code Life/safety issues Special transportation (elevators, escalators) Ceiling heights Natural and artificial lighting quality Engineering factors such as operation and maintenance of HVAC, [.fighting, Electrical, special features (access flooring, etc,) Product: Recommendations on each separate facility and recommendations on existing spaces planned to remain, be relocated or newly constructed, Approval: Secure City of Denton Project Representative approval of the report. 7. Overall Plan: Develop overall plans (site stacking and blocking plans) showing the use and configuration of City of Denton space. Factors to be considered in the development of the Plan Include the economic and operational analysis of the continued use of each City of Denton facility, the future projected space requirements, desirable adjacencies for the most efficient operation of City departments/groups, available space for relocations including the economic suitability of each projected relocation, and the time schedule to implement the overall plan. A. Develop graphics illustrating the overall plan. As a minimum, graphic would consist of the following: ' 1, "Existing" plan showing existing department configurations/locations by building and by floor of each building. u. , m } v o a! ' i i 2, Proposed conceptual plan of the final configurations/locations by existing and new proposed buildings and by floor of each building. 3. Time/bar chart of the master project schedule Implementation, including milestones with the beginning and completion dates of all I tasks required to complete the overall plan. 4. Phasing plan of moves, remodelings, new construction, eta S. Projected construction cost to implement the overall plan, including ,t economic evaluations of each studied facility for use, expansion, new . construction, remodeling, closures, eta r Products Overall concept plans illustrating each Department with specific recommendations for space allocation and location in avail City facilides with cost projections for each Department by Buildinb G' Master project schedule for moves; remodeling or additions for each Department by Building. Approval: Secure City of Denton approval of the plan, schedule phasing and cost. 03 8. Schematic Documentations Based on the approved overall plans, prepare <<. schematic plan documentation for each facility and each space, ;r Products This documentation would consist of the final preliminary overall plan configurations for each area of each Department in proposed and available targgeted facilities studied. These will be in 8 1/2 x 11 form as well as full size 1/8" scale drawings. ' Approval: Secure City of Denton approval of the Plan, schedule, phasing, and cost. i Note: Corgan Associates Architects will be available at any time to meet, answer , questions, or to make any presentations required before the City or pertinent applicable parties. t rl, eJ 'R r, -r i j 'r. - ref. 5.....J.Fi~i1L?iilii..a