HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-21-1991
41 a
4 .z ~'-r" . ,*~.sN;?.Yr~N,i1+'`.~~a.±A~+Skwh~#«II i~vGYiAtia~ib:, Ne~n}bR''•st~w;tA+~1f►A `+s°ti ~ai'd~C `":i~~'i~.'~`~?kr".IL'4f4 ~5oN r, ! #.:~'~'tl~iar~
ik ~
i !:~'.~t! ra aj*o ~^ra'Y r fr'dA~' ~1?4~!t ~t~ r'r ~ ~1y~y ♦ ~~tip'~tl
rl. reir 1'~~ rh r{x•.: ~Y 7{~ 1•[r"!r{ e/Y,r7t rg.!' tir.
I , 4
F`
i
i '
x, 2
r
APAAW POW""], Is
r p01f~IKA01w1}rAl INI N a Noyl
v / 1 ~C ON APAACIL
LOO Or R0ML ~kliq r 3 \
.N
pr°p \
ff
~ ~+a X90,, i
~ IL1C. txr. 1;0V~ 1
g /
cum
c0CArx0N NAP
1pl" '
w ~ ~P \ \ TRANCE
Hau 0. i UL \ \ \ 10' 1LIONO OA
LAADIa Ir ,qa.. \
/ V~ M W!►1" SAMIM ~ lsur noa eaN
Irll Tp. OIRViCA LA►o1cA1'tO p~l'! \ \ 4
CONCRETE PAYING ; Ali" n \'~qa \ \
~Ay \
1 aati carne w
1111 term f~
a"I HRVk! ~M'q 8 ~~ay
0*0 DCxtoitaN~ . cur
1 $~r~j ed1~~' 70 wo POIi LOW& rt1T1
1
i
1
bask. OAK ofC61ACUT 1 i 3'~ eA' t ia°Nrul,"~O~Rrr h
e
iN Or OlMl I YARD D°~ A y~
1
m T. 26'oAK1 to 1lMAI!
THN ADJACW O'AMOKRTY N /
f W OF *"Or YARO
Odp' Vti~~ :
It 1 9 ~~~ea~~' 4 ~
CW,IN LW ilnes
10' ILDNe to
[1AIt. W OAK TO N W M' i }M~1'
016TNb W w TM WW
p"T. 104 eLn TO e N 1
N OP 61011 YAPP
m
W PYAONW ICPM c
CONIC 1 WAVING
w w.uru r wwr~.w 60
I ~'i✓tii I ~A ~Rf A l VINII I' 1 ~ Y
1
1 l0ACM" f0 M000"M MAO OU 1 GWM PLAT M AID "N CdW&"k W IVISUAL
1,~~ TACO Owfo MOCKNOBW OMA Oft is WSwwO iWIV
Koowwr RAYMOND CONSINP ION:
2510 SOUTHWU SUItE 04
DALLAS, MA4 75229
MI VATS AiM ow"Ns OF cmwmo my UK &.14
mi. MUK ?o "VA"
=MEN ll~
r
ow "L "mv, ~ pike Lion
N N 1444, I WW s
a. OA Um. of r
wrlM IC 4 V-Mi/M'fffl AMA
IIDw "TV
r. No 7 _ s-
P _
IV CkAN LW M4= DOI. ?NMI* to O
W ---LNM w~a OLD NORM
~ t
LM OF fNM 1lNOMIAIY N ;
4~ !
~I
wm L PJW V N MOVALK P s
L1' mi 11 Y
x
~r !
ft MA r~
1
t; MM I r IM~IC MIFF
10P , yl
i f
DETAILED SIT 5 PLAN TIO"` wa ~
1
NI w r n wNe 'e+NX Zia" , -sow 0 '0
1
f
t .
i 1
L
•r
i
2mel k.-.d,..:/. ,&^$ow.lks2i•L'+k'k.sYJ2.JXS;'wSL~'~Ft~l:9~:N~i+~-~G"i~>~,"pt'1r75~141.i .a :J, 4}.. .~1.K>. ?lo-; #RL`tG:!:a. r ;JA
• r; ~~t•~- ~;y f • t y':, r Wit, a.
s ,A, i~ ;t;~~ ~f C.~l1 •i~ae~ ,e ~'ry4t ,{~K 1+}"
~ Ilk h ! 1 L{
k I,
hM AO M f PIS IMr N Nr/ , r 1 SRI .•~;~rV
y ~lfM4AL M d l t s
N or SsoSl fill
4'.f a S•
IT III IPI qiR . ~ •1't~ 1~~ r.1 i• tt' f„
IICYAMC4~ M ~t 14
e-
lle OF ROM / r f P1• • ! 1 i H .
Ck,
do /
ruo. rxT, \ \
O~
L OCA T I0N MAP cum
1 f
12002- of
T144CK i~ fa~.ry~r~.~W - - - Yal a. fi4f J. a
\ ENTRANCE
W krona GA NIW E0 11rL M D
LAVNM f
.W
/ W / w wcrtk► EMBtNt )WW MLOO SIGN \ dF~ 5
rw rn. Ie*v+ca }1
CONCRETE PAYING `APRA c \ ICS
A n~ \ \ \
e~QV \ r°
con carne N nEme ~ T ~ r e
i ~ y M
TE"h/TE" l4b ar \ ~Aj
ao M/q 8 p~ ~ 44~ w . + r11
1 COO- Cl/T nwt o tia°rrwi~ \ ilQl ` , ~ a l-
r 1+ '
000 oA~ ' 30 IM POLE LW4TS f TYPJ
, z
c w
~ r
~P a4Tq6• ~bpy #
N * 1146 APJACIWT "rwZOMW'ln~a+"rr w
LM OF #"WLrl YAp O UN
1 b~ A
m / "Al~z911\60o" S ,
bm W OAKS TO FEMAN
r" ADJACW NOOPIRIY M r t '
z"D IN FOUNWAL UN
A DO OF VMT YAM ~ WEATHE R;60'
SUPPLY COMPANiY `.y4,.
1 DEN TON, f
P~ E 0" LW
a0' SLowa TV
VXOTM 1' M11/R MAN rxnT, N' OAK TO
S NS4N'M'1 "T.WELMTO ~ 0
m M ..y p e ~
on^OK ^ n1 war1IMIYA0 oirw W MA 0MY SCONN ~
f, .w'; ~f'
CoNC 1E PAVM
v bw N pT KEgES
MO PM WYPFW
i P riotr~ s.1LOOD~M IJ! i '
z
L ACA" TO t$DCKNWM MOAG O LL IfOM PLAtT M *0 "a COW&?PLICTIOH Or trOOVU 1DM ALO b MOOD OAM WAO NC~LpNA SVVAALKL
No &AD M AOOM "10 OCA11 WL LOT L ILAVS IpN Nei"*
1M11 IRLA"N& i A1'MlOpt I KooawtY . RAYMOND CONSTRUVION,
2510 SOUTHWELL SUITE 04
AMA, CIIO"►M Or CAltKWD NY Mx "M DALLAS, TEXAS 75229
x017, "WILM to FA M M I
L
TU. P" D PR us-. Won ANALYbIb ~ y
61TE AFMA 16" ACRES I revisions ,r
NK14W*1 "44W
Imt OA Rue I
owwm t 1~~,'f,J
s I
lI'ILbW4111
Y Na 91t J~.G~t~v
11
t
r 0" LW nnq IXIiT,111111N TO
LJ w t~uPOM Or OLD NOM
Ll* OF _ C_Y l i
E
T►M/ Faun ,r~orewtr w ;
1 J
00100/
F~~3= ~i Y 49-L I9 rr'`! r r~.
3•
H J
M. MA TOP "at i r
r ROW -f
}
~L lot "o, d n ti!
AOJAMR V" s • , i►'; ~ , fit;-•
DETAILED SITIE FLAN "0 ~
U-0 to low raw$ um bGyi I b0 G ~ Itp
•I ^i
-A I 7
e . ' fry?."'♦ , ,~N j{S 'f"l"4 +I•IX{,`~♦Q
f
' I f
I`
1
rte=
I
tt
P~.
i
1
s
x
r~
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
May 21, 1991
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday. May
21, 1991, at 5:15 p.m. in the civil Defense Room of City Hall,
215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items
will be considered:
Note: Any item listed on the Agenda for the work session may
also be considered as pact of the Agenda for the
Regular Meeting.
5:15 p.m.
Executive Session:
i
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
1. Consider action in re: Flow.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), ,
Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
t~
1. Consider appointmento to the citizens
Traffic Safety Support Commission, the
Zoning Ordinance Task Force, and the Public
utilities Boari.
2. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the
Human Services 'Committee preliminary budget
recommendations for the 1991-92 program year.
3. Receive a report and hold a disoussion regarding:
r
a. Conditioned zoning
} b. Sidewalk exceptions, and
C. Preliminary Zoning Ordinance Task Force F
Recomme:,datione
t
4, Receive a report and hold a h)scussion regarding a
e plan and replacement of word processing equipment.
5. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding
curbside recycling.
6. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the
updated City Council Budget Questionnaire.
City of Denton City Council Agenda
May 21, 1991 1
Page 2
7. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the '
1991-92 budget requests from the City Attorney and
Municipal Judge. i
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
May 21, 1991, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of City
Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following
items will be considered:
7:00 p.m.
t-
1. Pledge of Allegiance
2. Presentation of Yard of the Month Awards
3. Consider approval of the minutes of the Regular
Session of April 16, 1991 and the Special Call Session
of April 23, 1991.
1
4. Citizen Reports
A. Receive a citizen report from Barbara Russell
regarding the structure of the Chamber of t~
Commerce and its relationship to the City of
Denton.
B. Receive a citizen report from Carole harp
regarding the closing of an easement and the
unauthorized overuse of the property by the City
of Denton.
C. Receive a citizen report from Truman Harp
regarding the closing of an easement and the
unauthorized overuse of the property by the City
of Denton.
a
51 Public Hearings#
A. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an
ordinance rezoning a 14.06 acre tract of land
from Planned Development district to Agricultural
District on property located on the southeast
corner of US Ilwy. 77 and Riney Road, north of
Windsor Drive. Z-91-003 (Planning and Zoning a
Commission recommends approval).
I
v
City of Denton City Council Agenda
May 21, 1991
Page 3
d
w
' B, Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an
ordinance rezoning a 16.5 acre tract of land from
Agricultural t nn Development
property located south of the
intersection of US Hwy. 3so and Mingo Road, east
of Mockingbird Lane for the purpose of a regional
distribution center for commercial air
Commissions recommended . Z-91-005
(Planning ingand an zoning heating
approval).
C. Hold a public hearing and consider approval of a
resolution authorizing the closing of portions of
Woodland Street and Sell Avenue on May 24 and May }
25, 1991,
D. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an
ordinance amending the general zoning ordinance
to allow accessory uses within specified
non-residential districts. (Planning and zoning
Commission recommends approval).
E. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an
'h ordinance amending the Denton Development Code by
adding an exception to sidewalk requirements,
(Planning and zoning Commission recommends
approval).
F. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an
ordinance amending the general zoning ordinance
by adding a new Article 10A to provide for ,
conditioned zoning. (Planning and zoning
commission recommends approval).
Consent Agenda
6,
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff
recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the
Ir City !tanager or his designee to implement each item in
accordance with the Staff recommendations.
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be
I approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the
agenda. gr.,ailed back-up information is attached to the
ordinances (Agenda items 7.A, 7.81 7,C). This listing is
provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to
discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance.
I
~ti. ' x,c ilifp
City of Denton City Council Agenda
May 21, 1991
Page 4
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
1. Bid #1248 - Water Treatment Chemicals
2. Bid #1242 - Disposal of PCB Equipment and
Debris (The Public Utilities Board
recommends approval.)
3. RFP #1202 - Wang - Hord Processing Upgrade
4. P.O. # 13623 - Maintenance Agreement with
ism - Mainframe Computer Hardware
S. P.O. # 13622 - IBM - System Software
6. Bid #1251 - Remodel Denton Public Library
E
B. Tax Refunds I
1. Consider approval of a tax refund for Cedar III
Ridge Properties - 13,012.69
2. Consider approval of a tax refund for r
Beneficial Standard Life Insurance Company - 1
1961.37
z
7. Ordinances
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services. (6.A.1. - Bid
#1248, 6.A.2. - Bid #12421 6.A.6 - Bid #1251) it
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for
the expenditure of funds Por purchases of
materials or equipment which are availatole from
one source in accordance with the provirions of
state law exempting such purchases from
requirements of competitive bids, (6,A.4, - P.O.
#13623, 6-A.5. - P.O. #13622)
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting a {I
competitive sealed proposal and awarding a
contract for the purchase of materials, 1
equipment, supplies, or services. (6.A.3. RFP
#1202)
J
1
J
i
City of Denton City Council Agenda
May 21, 1991
Page 5 '
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for
the saving of established fees authorizied to be
collocted pursuant to the Code of Ordinances of
the City of Denton, Texas; providing that a
schedule of fees shall be maintained on file in
the office of the City secretary.
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the
Director of Utilities to execute contracts with
electric utility customers to reduce electrical
power demand; and authorizing credits on utility
bills for customers who execute such contracts. i
(The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.)
8. Resolutions
A. Consider approval of a resolution supporting the j
Texas Library Associations request for the
addition of $51,000 to the Legislative Budget
Board recommendation for the Statewide Library
Development Program for the fiscal year 1992-93,
to meet the Maintenance-of-Effort Requirement
preserving 14.9 million in Library services and I
Construction Act Title 1 funding. (The Library
Board recommends approval.)
B. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
City Manager to sign and submit to the Department
of Housing and Urban Development a Final
Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of
Funds.
C. Consider approval of a resolution appointing a
member to the Upper Trinity Regional Water Board
of Directors.
D, Consider approval of a resolution changing the
regular city Council meeting of June 181 1991 to
June 25, 1991.
96 Consider an appointment of a voting delegate to the i
North Central Texas Council of Governments.
10. Consider a motion to appoint Council Members to work
with staff, County Commissioners Court and the public
to define new voting district.
11. Consider approval of a request from the cable
Television Advisory Board recommending the televising
of City council meetings.
12. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
1
J
all n
Via" N::
City of Denton City Council Agenda
May 21, 1991
Page 6
13. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
14. New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to 1
suggest items for future agendas.
15. Executive Session: j
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
A. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
i
:
t
NOTE: THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO
EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT
IS LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE.
I
C E R T I F I C A T E
1 certify that the above notice of. meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of 1991 at o'clock
(a.m.) (p.m.}
CITY SECRETARY
3366C
i
WM1
Sovs-
,
JONATHAN B. COTT
217 Tanglewood Dr, i
I Denton, Texas 76201
(817) 382-9425
,
May 6, 1991
Mayor Bob Castleberry
215 E. McKinney
Denton, TX 76201
Dear Bob:
It was nice to see you again at the city council meeting on April
30. i
j !
As you may know, since closing DENTON TODAY MAGAZINE I have gone
to work for Waste Management Inc, in Dallas. My hours are long and
unpredictable, and my commute is over an hour each way, a
As a result, it has become impossible for me to fulfill my monthly
obligation to the Denton Traffic and Safety Commission. It is just
too difficult to get back to Denton by 500 p.m.,
I have thoroughly enjoyed my tenure with the DTSC but feel that in
the best interest of my friends on the commission, and out of
respect to you, I must formally resign my position effective
immediately.
Thank for the opportunity to serve the citizens of Denton.
E Best 6gard
ona h
/pl
1•
j{. lYIIY^.
1
i
s
M E M O R A N D U M
TOS Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM1 Mark R. Chew 1
DATE: May 6, 1991
BUBJECTS Resignation from the Public Utilities Board
t
I ~ I
Due to my recent election to the Denton City Council, i hereby
resign my posit he Public Utilities Boerd,
Mark R, Chew
i ~
'I
I
i
i
i
a
r
DATE: 5/21/91
ScllYSi4.SJ1~ScIL REPORT~ORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJ., Discussion of 1991-92 Human Services Committee's
preliminary budget recommendations.
i
$F.~41:1MF.►~Qdt I ON
The Human Services Committee recommends approval of
the following preliminary budget recommendations the
1991-92 fiscal year. i
SPAN (social services) $ 28,000 j J
Friends of the Family $ 339000 1t
Fred Moore Child Care S 28,000
City County Day Nursery $ 14,000
Retired Senior Volunteer
Program $ 8,500 I
HOPE, Inc. = 60000
Community Food Center $ 3,000
AIDenton $ 61000
Prenatal Clinic for
Denton County $ 81000 i)
The Committee also recommends reallocation of the 1990-
91 allocation of $ 2,100 from Parents Anonymous to
other agencies.
HSC also recommends that the Handi-hop and SPAN
elderly trareportation budgets again be placed
under their jurisdiction.
aACKGROUNU:
The Human Services Committee has recently held hearings
to obtnin information and clarification from agencies
regarding their request for City funding. On May 6, 1991,
HSC proceeded to consider pr~,liminary budget recommenda-
tions to Council. HSC members are aware of Council's
direction concerning not funding health services and
that incresed funding will be difficult, They
agreed to revise budget the budget recommendations
if necessary after Council consideration on May 21, 1991.
During 1990-91 budget hearing and budget approval process
Parents Anonymous was allocated $ 2,700 for agency
expenses, At that time funding das reduced to three
existing agencies in order to fund Parents Anonymous.
HSC is now requesting that Council direct staff to
prepare an ordinance reallocating the $ 2,700 to those
i ~
i
agencies for use in this fiscal year. Agency allocations
would be as follows:
SPAN $ 800.00
Friends of the Family $ 1,300.00
RSVP $ 601.00
The Human Services Committee discussed the transportation
budget and agreed that funding for Handi-Hop and elderly R
transportation is a human services issue and should fall
under the Committee's jurisdiction. They felt that
budgetary recommendations regarding these services should
be discussed and approved by HSC prior to Council con I
sideration.
SUMMARY: The Human Services Committee at their May 6th meeting
made three recommendations:]
Council approval of 1991-92 preliminary
budget recommendations.
Approval of $ 2,700 Parent Anonymous reallocation.
Return of Handi-Hop and SPAN elderly transportation
to HSC ,jurisdiction.
(see attachment I)
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR OROIPS AFFECTED:
The Community Development Office of the Planning and ?
Development Department will administer the budget r~
and the contractual relationship with each agency.
1
F SI CAL IMPACT:
If Council recommends an increase in the human services
budget the general fund must absorb the increase. No
administration funds are included in the human services
budget.
The reallocation of 1990-91 funding from Parente
e Anonymous will have no impact on the general fund
since funds were previously allocated for human
services function.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Summary
ii. April 22 minutes
IIi. May 8 minutes t
Rasp fully su~m~ttsd:
L1 yd V. Harrell
City Manager
a
MaP-red/,b'y:
~y
' 1
Barbara Ross
Community Development Coordinator C
Appro d:
a
j Frank Robb a AICP C
S Executive Director for Planning 4 Development
}
E .
i
E i
1
-1
' r F
ATTACHMENT I
HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE
PRELIMINARY BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1988 1969 1990 1991 1991
Budget Requests le c.
WILL Budget
WILL A Inc
,9_-Y
' $ 26x000 $ 260000 $ 250200 $ 28,000 $ 26x000
SPAN
(Social Service Programs) 35,000 330000
{
Friends of the Child 26 000 28,000 Family 33,000 330000 2 318x700
pied Moore ,000 28,000 28,000
~y }
Care Center 11,000
141000 141000 14 x000 140000
Denton City-County
Day Nursery 70800 60900 ~J
60800 61200
RSVP 61800 }
51000 50000
5x000 51000 5,000
HOPE 30000
0 20800 31000
I Community Food Center -
- 300000 51000
hloenton J;
- 0 21700 0 No Req8
parents Anonymous 6,000
0 0 110000'
a prenatal Clinio - t $
for Denton county
$1561800 91580800 $115,600 5142,500 111260800
TOTALS - 460000
$1121800' ':'I
a Transportation funding subtracted from 1969 Budget Total'
I
` The $126,800 budget total represents a 101 increase over the 1990 budget0
1 I
i
a
{
i
}
M 151 So
i
1
1 ~
t
ATTACHMENT It
1
Official Minutes
Human Services Committee
April 22, 1991
Present: Jim Bezdek, Dorothy Damico, Anita Cowan, Gary Truitt
Katie Dawson, Barbara Atkins, Sandy Kristoferson, Terry
Garrett, Linda Holloway
Staff Barbara Ross, Community Development Coordinator;
Present: Beverly Edwards, Community Development Secretary
Chairperson, Dorothy Damico, called the meeting to order at 3:00
p.m. and gave an update on committee activity.
Sandy Kristoferson moved that the minutes from the meeting of
January 16, 1991 be approved, Anita Cowan seconded the motion and
it passed unanimously.
thatM ouncil had agreed ittwasisomething with Committee should work {
on. It was also noted that the United Way is restructuring itself
because they are in the process of hiring a new director and part '
of their restructuring will be the upgrading the United Way
information and referral services. At this time this is a part
time service done by a part time person. There is also a retired
presbyterian minister who is currently working on the committee
with Barbara Atkins, !ieserend Ei,;rrley who is attempting a similar
type of project that would be tracking and access to information
for the various agencies. Things are improving in the area of
client tracking and information ark! referral. I suggest that we
meet with some of there yr,nops thin summer to gain information and
possibly help to coordinate there efforts.
Mr. Truitt queatior,ed, would this be in line with what the
cooperative ministries are st-xrting or in addition to or
separate from that.
Me. Atkins explained coorDratiya ministries is trying to track
any clients that come in and seek service through the agency that
is willing to allow information to go out. The cooperative
ministries is also a part of the committee that Reverend Brawley
is heading. What the ministerial alliance is looking at is i
combining services. The committee has gone out in the metroplex
area looking at various shelters and cities that have some of their
services combined under one roof.
asked Mr. Truitt u committee had ever
the
card system. This is both for federal andst to but risgalso p tied
in with community organizations where the recipients of services
have a card that ie like a tiny microfiche but looks like a plastic
credit :ard and basically has all their information on it and
where they have qualified for services. The client also carries
a card which carries a personal identification code with
1
J
t.
f
HSC Minutes
April 22, 1991
Page 2
their picture on it, their date
number, of birth and social
security
Ms. Damico requested that the Committee move into the list of
hearings with Barbara Atkins of HOPE, inc.
Ms. Atkins expressed HOPE's appreciation for consideration
for funding from the city. She also stated HOPE is
fourth year and became a United Way
supported The agency is asking for maintenance type funding. in last their
need for families that are homeless orpe funding, The documented a
d
ecreasing, The agency is receiving anaverage of 40 to 60inewot
calls from
p
Ms. Atkins statedethey are trying t type of housing assistance.
of families that they can work with fromraboutt4e
tov 5r Up number
i families, There is p to 6
Atkins expressed the board currently is looking atkan increasirn staff
handle the work load, g Ms.
Ma. Dawson pointed 8 staff to
application and categories twere tmeshe had vi HOPE Inc.06
ntionedrsuchwas category one
families, she requested that Ms. Atkins explain the categories, f
Ms. Atkins explained from the start the y one
f thought
be working with assisted families for 30 to 9 they would
I they do not quit working with them at the end of y90adays~ other
than financially they have co me to the realization that there are
other types of n,eeds. Many times it is
' There are sometimes attempts to coordinate wust for ith othertthe FE A grant
as to raise a rent or deposit payment,
has also added to the numbers of People that areninheFoffice as
well as the duties. grant
with for two to three here are many families that HOPE has worked rs at come back for for help with decisions a againhthisais related to home andefamily.
financilal assistanrelated that ce, Category I
given a lot of time in an ongoing y has received
has been
to three year period. Category matter for maybe a year or two
Mr, Bezdek asked why were there over 1$OOO~families who made
inquiries and yet only 22 were served.
a peri
Ms. Atkins responded 22 families were served financially for
Mr. Bezdek asked what od up to three months.
Me. Atkins re at d that rant canobehpaidhfo families,
days with a FEMA grant and that this was the reasonatheiboardrhad
elected for HOPE to continue to make application for the funds to
come into the Denton area. With FEMA funds the rent can be
for one family or their utilities and IS little bit of food
assistance for a paid
period of one month,
aid. Mr. Bezdek asked how HOPE decided which family received the
Ms. Atkins stated this was very difficult, most families that
1
y
A
HSC Minutes
April 22, 1991
Page 3
have been referred have been screened by coming
emergency type agencies and the
that has a chance to y may have through some of the
ers get back on their feet with spomenintensive
effort. Othpendameakn
volunteers s are Just calls that come into the
Mr. es d the er week just dealin office
if
g with those calls'.
Ms, Atkins replied they served Denton County,
work or that HOPE serves families that either live, `
go to school in Denton, so some of those families live out
in the County. The higher
residents. Percentage of the families are city
Ms. Ross informed the committee that HOPE
an emergency shelter grant for approximate)
Presented also has requested
pilot a proposal to the C080 committee to request funds for the
i on erThe Project i CDBO n order to assist families u also
9 ttee will be recommending to a
fund that pilot program, Year or even
Ms. Atkins stated the to council that we
that they have a stron they have been an organization lon
beginning h to other look at g working long range committee g enough
are referred to them. Ys to assist other types oan were
fdfamilies
demonstrattemlocalssu d if any of the other grants might fulfill, pPort that human services funding that HOPE
Ms. Atkins stated that none will be re g from the city
Ms. Damico questioned if HOPE needed toutmon
s
to run ervicetwould HOPE have the capability of takin
operation and divide it demonstrate coat for
delivery, to determine coettfor service they bu and I monthMs. Atki that HOAEes cost was9 a about $600.00
about :460.00 this bit underr t amity per
of financial assistance as Year. HOPE attem hat amount,
Ms. Hollows quickly as pta to wean clients off
Y asked if possible,
$48000 iuded
Ms. Atkins stated that w
as.only nclent administration.
costs to Damico asked again if then expenses,
get a total cost figure. Y could add in adminletrative
Ms. Atkins said
t
figure for that, She satealth ugh she did not current) they assisted 22 to 2s families y paid only one caseworker andathea
Ms. Damico asked who thPer
erchair.of HOPE Y
Ms. Atkins replied it a
was currently Manc
Ms, Cowan questioned if FEMA funds had' Inc, board was,
last feu Y Harrell.
Ma, Atkins stated that this increased over the
what they Atkins
what
ed last Year Denton received about half
be 247rece last year. The total grant this
t
COMPl O be t$4 working year it was $76,000 Year is going
and served wih he first half plus' 110$2 has just
about 79 families.
which was about =23,000 plus
F i
1
HSC Minutes j
April 22, 1991
Page 4
1
Me. Damico asked if there are any plans to be hiring extra
people or expanding.
Ms. Atkins stated that this year HOPE is planning to hire
questioned ifs the grants applied
other Ms. Ross with some of
available would HOPE be able to hire someone.
Ms. Atkins stated at th's time wn must, due to the need,
for the type of work we need to do.
Ms Holloway questioned if there were other agencies in the
city that provided this type of service.
Me. Atkins stated not for the long term. Agencies such as
would programs
families
the are Cooperative
emergency s d Ministries type rfacilities some of h thatchurch
into HOPE.
Mr. 8ezdek asked what HOPE's success rate was and did they
have any data to support that. j
Ms. Atkins stated that up to about a year ago the success
rate was 40 plus per cent. We were told this was a good percentage
for this tvpe of family. When they leave the program, the families
are measured from the day they come into the program and when they '
leave the percentage is much higher around 50 per cent have jobs
a year or llonger.
are able to fund on families that have beennouhousing. There t of the program is
i
i
Ms. Damico introduced Merridee McClatchy of RSVP.
Ms. McClatchy discussed the funding request from RSVP. She
specifically mentioned the contribution RSVP volk*nteers make to the
communit. She stated that over the past volunteer have provided 8,076 million hours 2 of yservices. She also
explained that RSVP places people 60 years or older who are retired
16
and semi-retired and governmental matching t who up t volunteers. non-profit agencies
different agencies throughout the county where RSVP has placed
around 600 volunteers. Last year's figures show RSVP contributed
back to the community about 114,000 hours in the Denton community.
Last year to the City and the human services agencies the
volunteers in Denton contributed over 19,148 hours of volunteer
service. To figure that at minimum wage of $3.80 this was a
contribution back to the City of Denton in the amount of $729762.
The agency is asking for $7,600 dollars. In 1988 in Police
Department volunteers donated 322 hours, in 1990 it jumped to 1005.
In 1988 for the Fire Department there was a total of 48 hours, in
i990, 862 hours. The library in 1988 was 603 hours, in 1990, 1228
hosurs. in the human services agencies in Hs a HcCletchyrs provided
'1.,478 hours, and 1m 1990, 60016 hours. . noted that
title was a tremendous increase in service. Code Enforcement was
mentioned as a new area where volunteers are providing ase'.stance.
1
i
r.
1
"SC minutes
April April 22, Jr.
Page 6 Martin Luther King oring
some
Also, the tutoring and ment. for at the
Recreation Centiep new arRSVPea for RSYd& dr inforts here ark
}auded . RSVP has worked with the Parks
ty aPLibrary, City council mmunitY to
newspaper coverage
& Recreation, C successful.
a
work rtne with shiDS the there childrearen. Th tutor e s program
Denton R'cord-Chronicle has been very working showing
at ng MILK
work
An article was published in the
near 60 presently librarian and has retired Picture of a Ann Davis who
in the community. There are many
library with the children. Ms, Davis is a erience and RSVP provides
enroyed her work volunteer{ Chat have exp Me.
volunteers in the commun ty nities to serve the °n °ane iof~ their
a newspaper clipping
ahowed opportU
the volunteers o with
MCClatchy to use the computer in order he assist
data on the computer and in the Pot ce
volunteers who was learning o to be responsive
RSVP trying
offices entering 911
City data entry. calling about the enteri Department y needs There were many people
to community wanting to join the computer class.
Particle in the newspaper ethe Committee to recognizo!
out® that they
µs, MCClatchythe Community by RSVP. She P
last year, RSVP would like that
furnished to
experienced a 9% cut from the City cut was not what the
back and requested some of need nthat the
Ms. KristofersoneCO O nded to Council- y her report regarding
Committee initially
Ms. Atkins asked o. McCletchY to C are 66,
µs, McClatchY noted that 703 was the number of volunteers.
number of clients served. 1e that
µs. Holloway asked what RSYP did with the DtOp
ri ng now that would like to volunteer their
federal
67~ 58 who who is are that reti handled. ey
are under ram
time,Mf McClatchy emphasized that they
infor+aallY
em, enrolled in are car old eednotghvery If they are
't g
regulat~~c}snot to have e to the age fi they are C .
rovided with information about 1na~s for
are very friend and call the they are Pil they 9n their 2b ' s and 30's also.
too much y we do this for pep
positions. Point out that there a~f more red o P
She went on to P are always in need volunteers.
o about findiia usually done
volunteers a nd they they can but it eo le
Mr, Garrett stad how does ted anyway3VP g
µe, McClatchy studies h
through other volunteers ave shown that most RSVP has
asked,by another person and currently
volunteer by being of to get
volunteer reasure aret plTheaced volunteers are
in a pot
rust initiated a recruiting for RSVP and thei names were already volunteering
prizes. percentage
µs, Dawson asked what before they turned 80 and joined RSVP,
µs, McClatchy stated she had no statistics at this time that
14SC Minutes
April 22, 1991
Page 6
they are attempting to move away from that. She mentioned that
sometlmos people have criticized on that point.The mission is to
stimulate volunteer activity and take down barriers to people who
want to participate. Ms. Damico mentioned that often after people
turn sixty and are placed on RSVP's roster they are given more than
one volunteer position. In the past, they may have only been
volunteering in one area.
Mr. Bezdek asked who assumed liability for the volunteers.
Ms. McClatchy stated that they were under federal mandate to
carry liability insurance, and that they have an insurance policy
meets ACTION criteria. Three types of insurance is carried on the
volunteers, personal liability, an accident policy and automobile
liability since they are going to and from their volunteer
position.
Mr. Bezdek asked how large the staff was for RSVP.
Ms. McClatchy stated the agency has including herself two
full time positions, one 60 per cent position, one 46 percent
position and one 32 percent position for the entire county.
Mr. Garrett asked what were the two full time positions.
Me. McClatchy stated the director (herself) and an office r
manager/project director were the full time employees.
Ms. Damico introduced Al Murdock and Erica Lissberger of SPAN
Mr. Murdock discussed the set of nine separate services
offered by SPAN which are characterized as being in a social
service category. Some of the services are relatively new and some
have been offered for some Lime. Mr. Murdock stated that services
are offered in several different communities. Congregate meals
require a place or center where the service is provided and other
services are in individual's homes. one of the characteristics of
these types of services is that these are people that are marginal
in terms of health, housing resources that are available to them,
and in terms of money. The danger is that when there are programs
that are designed to enable people to stay in their own homes it
may be enabling someone to stay at his or her home and that is the
worst place for them to be. It takes quite a bit of monitoring by
the people who the people who are delivering the services to see
when they need something other than we are able to give them.
Because of proliferation of the services in Denton very often the
people do not have to leave the community. They go to one of the
mental health facilities or one of the hospitals or some other type
of service facility in the community. SPAN is asking for $28,004
which is a slight increase. Mr. Murdock stated that the principal
reasons for that increase was that costs continue to go up per unit
of service that the number of people being served continues to go
up. There are voluntary donations for some services such as the
Meals service and the amount is still $1.04. SPAN took the steps
9
HSC Minutes '
April 22, 1991
Page 7
to encourage a larger portion of the people who receive the meal
to pay for their meals. All of the counties have been encouraged
to keep a degree of secrecy as Lo who pays. In the services that
are delivered in individual's homes SPAN is required by the state I
to ask people to pay. There is a sliding scale that begins at a 1
very low level and goes down to nothing. SPAN continues to serve
people even though they cannot i'
pay,
number of home delivered mealsthatPAare ab being iserveade atinmost s the
places. The places were SPAN serves the meals are not SPAN'a, they
are owned by the cities where the service take place. The cities
help SPAN to keep those places going, they pay certain costs, they
share complaints or recommendations with SPAN and they keep close
contact in all cases. Several of the facilities are very old and
are in need of constant attention and repairs. SPAN has received I
letters from recipients of care or their families thanking us for
the services that SPAN offers. They comment positively on the
people that provide the service. SPAN has had a
and is taking steps at all times to control the cost dtotkeepythe
efficiency as high as possible. The funds that come from
public sources are always under constraints and can be used for
only certain purposes. SPAN is attempting to get greater
participation from the cities where services are provided. Mr.
Murdock stated that he has met with all of the town mangers and
city managers and talked with them about the number of 1
services that SPAN has delivered in their communities and
encouraged them to provide funds to help offset some of the
coat.
M9. Holloway questioned Mr. Murdock concerning his statistics.
She stated that their report listed total number of persons {
contacting the agency was 850 yet total number served was 3,040.
She asked Mr. Murdock to clarify that.
Me. Lissberger explained that the question regarding number
of persons contacting the agency were gust people contacting the
agency with questions, not the clients they serve. J
Ms. Dawson asked how meal delivery fit in with Meals On 1
Wheals.
Mr. Murdock advised that SPAN does not do home delivery meals
in Denton, Meals on Wheels does it.
throughout the county, Lewisville, Colony,e Pilots Point,i Sainger, i
and Lake Dallas, and also Heritage Oaks but not in the community
in Denton.
Mr. Garrett mentioned that earlier Mr. Murdock stated SPAN 1
encourages everyone to pay $1.00, he asked how do
who pays $1.00 and who does not. You determine
Mr. Murdock stated they were using a pay box. SP At his time when the pays. He stated
the center for the meal they register for the record keeping into
for federal and state record keeping and when the individual signs
I111I~ , 1
A ,
I
1
HSC Minutes
April 22, 1991
Page 8
t
in they receive an envelope and the envelope encourages them to
the the eome
ay if with
envelope
. This is the same not type refuse envelope
contribute. This
but SPAN does
does not come back.
rr Ms. Atkins asked if the fourteen people on the staff include
r the Homemaker 16 II.
Ms. Liseberger responded that this does not include the The
a health care agency is certified.
it is P oe an
homemake ovided cause that is a sercbutha that at it adminstr
personal ca
homemaker handles the p transportations
, Ross asked what was the total budget for trans
Ms. medication.
rtat on was
and social services.
. L{ssberger stated the total budget for transpo
Ms
$666,853.
Ms. Damico asked who was the chairman of the boar .
µizell. c went on to
Mr. Murdock advised it was Rcouncil that has to have at
' state that they have an advisory and half of the
people on it from Denton County , there is a nine
least have to be of t retirement age. 1e who are at large
people 30 would cers of the
member b crd o plus two to three other speop the of
advisory council.
on the advisory
~ Ms. Kristofereon asked if any effort had ever been made to ge
i
a Meals on wheals program for the ColorY or Lek{n sa .
Elm.
Mr. Murdock programed that SPAN gad one in each of those
but was a they're desire lookitong start for one volatunteers Little to set
communities and that there
No funds are available
Little Elm.
the service up
µs. Holloway asked then what was the difference betweeenfMeals
on wheels and the home delivered meals that SPAN offered,
funding sources or what.
Mr. Murdock replied that in almost all of the were delivered t es t meals there was a conger gate Murdock advisedtih a MLK SPAN cent provide
from that center. of week a
Denton at noon, five days
Oaks. But Meals on wheels is a separate program. would have
me. Cowan asked how the two services differ.
Me. Lissberger stated that to get a SPAN meal they SPAN
to be 60 years or older, Meals onheelsgtakesines one needa there
is a need. SPAN also has very strict
must certify that they are homebound and in need.
µe, Atkins asked if there was quite a bit of coordination with
meals on Wheels,
Ms. Lissberger replied that SPAN was a referrah~ Qre Meals
office
wheals. If som0njnemealesonnwhfor eelsedoeson threally refer them to
the tall
but we we do do provide the telephone number.
i
MSC Minutes
April 22, 1991
Page 9
Mr, Garrett questioned as to who sponsors the food. ?
Mr. Murdock and Ms. Lissberger explained that this is a state
program and SPAN contracts with the state to provide food under
their criteria. SPAN provides the food. At the Senior Center SPAN
provide the equipment, freezers, refrigerators, and heating units
(meat system). The meals come frozen and are heated and delivered
to the center. They go from the freezer to refrigerator, to slow
thawing and then to the heating process.
the serrvicesrofc a dietician n Ms serving
Lissberger added have
that the have
home
bound people are taken care of on weekends or a family member
will come in and take care of the meals for them, also families
will take care of them when there are days ice is on the ground
or SPAN will either provide them with extra meals.
j Mr. Garrett asked about people on special diets and did SPAN
provide those.
handler ThMurdock stated
attempted to dotsome choices complication
clients but if there
were an extremo limitation they could not get into that.
Ms. Damico introduced the representatives from
City County Day Nursery, Mary Thibodeaux, Trudy Foster
and Vicky Molchan.
Ms. Thibodeaux, discussed City County Day Nursery as being a
daycare and kindergarten program for children of low income working
or working parents. She explained that they are now at capacity
and have a waiting list that has occurred during the last year and
people continue to call and inquire about the services that are
provided. Me. Thibodeaux advised that they are aware that the City
has had a great deal of budgetary constraints and we are very
pleased that the level of funding for our agency has been
maintained. The funds are being used well and the agency will
continue to use the funding in the future. Vicki Molchan the
director has been in the directorship for one year and a half and
is doing an excellent ,ioL bringing the center to an increasingly
professional level. We Are working with the board in all areas
with the policies and procedures and have generally become more
efficient. Ms. Thibodeaux went on to relate that they have
increased the number of children while at the same time reducing
the cost per child. Last year upon talking with this agency and
others there was a need for insurance and for benefits for
onempthloyees during
property andeareaalso Tworking eboard sliupgraded the ability insurance insurance
on health insurance workman's compensation for the employees. In
order to bring about the coverage of insurance that is needed for
all parties involved the nursery has instituted a fee increase.
This schedule had not been changed in seven years. Fees have been
increased from a low of $25.00 to a low $30.00 dollars and the
I
rx
HSC Minutes A
April 22, 1991
Page 10
sliding scale from that goes up to $50.00 dollars according to the
level of the income of the parents. The fee increase will help
City County with part of the insurance coverage but the nursery i
will need to be able to maintain the insurance coverage as well to
make other improvements as in future years. Ms. Thibodeaux
went on to discuss the increase in the budget and wanted to give
justification for the increase on page 5. The first section are
sources of revenue. The state food program with a slight
increase roughly ;800.00 reflects the increased number of children,
80 enrolled at the present time. The nursery is asking that the
HSC Committee maintain the amount that was funded in the previous
year. From United Way we were granted $47,300 and are asking for
a little bit more, largely to cover the insurance need as well as
some other operating needs, computer parts and up to date on record
keeping. The donations have maintained their level, the nursery
has been involved in a fund raising and a lot of the donations come
from that. The increase in program fees comes as a result of
increasing the fee schedule from the ;5.00 that was mentioned
earlier to give the amount that was projected. Approximately a
$20,000 increase in proposed budget over last year and much of that j
will go to the employee benefits, a minimal adjustment in salary
during the year and operating. On the expenditures the nursery i
would like to propose a 4% percent increase in salaries. The board
feels that the staff is not being paid anywhere near the value that
is being provided to the community. The increases in food reflect
the increased number of students at the school. The nursery has
been operating efficiently. The cost figure is per week. The fee
schedule is based on the income and the number in the family. Also
in income we include food stamps, housing, child support or any
monies coming in. On the food service, the 80 children are served
breakfast, lunch and two snacks everyday, so an $000.00 dollar
increase, was included in the groceries.
Committee members commended Ms. Thibodeaux on the decrease in
cast per child.
Mr. Bezdek asked if the fee schedule were set up per week or
month.
Me. Molchan stated it was per week.
Me. Ross asked to for further information on the fee schedule.
Me. Molchan passed around a chart based on income and number
in family.
Ms. Ross asked for instance at what point would a family pay A
the highest rate of $50.00.
Ms. Thibodeaux stated that a two person family with an income
of $ 20,000 would pay $50.00 per week.
Mr. Garrett requested a clarification on the cost for food.
Me. Molchan stated that was merely an increase for the two
meals and two snacks the nursery provided to the children.
She went on to explain the funds provided by the Texas Department
i
1
I
1
x
HSC Minutes 1
April 22, 1991
Page 11
of Humen Services.
Ms. Damico asked if the representatives would explain how
their services differ from those provided by Fred Moore. i
Me. Thibodeaux pointed out that Fred Moore doea not have a
kindergarten room but they do have a younger group that we do not
have. Ms. Molchan stated that they have the same number of
classrooms but Fred Moore starts earlier and City County services
an older group that Fred Moore does not. She also mentioned that
they serve different populations.
Ms. Atkins asked if City County was a vendor under the Child
Care Management System of the State.
Ms. Molchan explained that Title 20 which was previously `J
federal funding has now been restructured under a TDHS
program for any licensed childcare facility in the state. J
City County is a now a qualified vendor under that program.
Ms. Molchan went on to explain how the subsidy was supplied under
1 the program and how she hoped at least 60% of the parents would
qualify.
Ms. Atkins inquired if City County was anticipating getting I
any more referrals.
Me. Molchan stated that with a waiting list of 74 they weren't
really in need of referrals.
Mr. Truitt asked if they anticipated losing children when the
rate increase went into effect.
Ms. Molchan stated that this was something new and the way
it has been structured it should not effect parents more than $6.00
a week.
Me. Holloway asked if City County coordinated at all with Fred
Moore on their fee schedule so that the income eligibility levels
would be similar.
Me. Molchan said that Paula Layton of Fred Moore Child Care
has recently asked for a copy of their fee schedule and that they
have been in close contact. There are also two committees from
each board that meet several times a year to discuss needs and how 1
the centers can help one another etc.
Ms. Damico asked what the percentage of children were from
the City of Denton.
Ms. Molchan a good estimate would be 80%. {
Me. Cowan questioned as to the board's liability, whether the
board is required, since they are now a TDHS vendor, to have board
liability insurance.
Ms. Thibodeaux replied that United Way brought this up to
the board and as the board started to check into liability there
were a tot of board members around the city and other cities
that are developing some fear serving without any protection and
getting sued. Me. Thibodeaux went on to relate that the
coverage was difficult because of the children and the type of
facility that they run is at greater risk.
1
"SC Minutes
April 22, 1991
Pgge 12
Mr. Bezdek asked who owns the building.
Ms. Foster stated that the building is paid for by the
people who were originally board of directors. The land was given
by the Methodist church and as long as there is a nursery there
the Methodist church will allow them to have the building and at
any time that it is no longer a public nursery the land will go
back to the Methodist church along with the building.
Mr. Bezdek questioned how does the cost compare to private
preschool in Denton.
Ms. Molchan replied incredibly well, last summer calls were
made and they found that it was an average of $57 to S58 a week.
The top rate will be $50 as of June 1st, and at this time it is
$25 to $43 a week.
Ms. Holloway asked if there was an income limit at which point
a family would not be served.
Me. Molchan stated yes, the limit is on the sliding scale.
Me. Thibodeaux stated there were concerns about increasing
the amount of a family that would have to pay per week, there were
also concerns about wages the employees were being paid and the
fact that they had no benefits. We also looked at the number of
years since a change had been made.
t
Me. Damico Introduced Susan Vardell of Friends of the Family.
Ms. Fielder introduced herself as being Chairman of the
Board for a years along with Karen Connor who has volunteered
for eight years and has been on the board for three years, and
Susan Vardell who is the Executive Director and has been with
the organization for two years, Me. Fielder thanked the
Committee for the money that was allocated to the Friends of the
Family for the past year. Ms. Fielder is asking for $35,006
which is a 10% increase over what was given last year. Ms.
Fielder said the organization could not necessarily point to one
thing that has necessitated the increase. Costs have gone up in
all areas. She mentioned that last year was a hard financial year
for the organization. The State of Texas took back $15,000 that
was already promised. Me. Fielder commented that in the month of
March the Denton Police department responded to 105 calls a
month to domestic disturbances. About 52 per cent of their
clients come from the city of Denton, and more than half are the
City of Denton residents. In the first three months of this
year they have sheltered over 100 women and children and this does
not include the Outreach clients. Also counseling was provided to
over 225 individuals. They have also begun an statement of where
they are going to put their emphasis. They want their policy to
reflect the goats of the agency. Ms. Fielder also related they
have a successful thrift store and they started out with people
II
1
1
1
1
HSC Minutes
April 22, 1991
Page 13
wanting to give something to agencies such as clothing and small
appliances.
Ms. Connor related that as representatives of the government
of Denton, public safety is one of the basis responsibilities
of government and Friends of the Family looks at their
responsibilities in this area as not just human services but as a
very basic protective service. The clients have a right a life
without beatings, grievous injuries, or even death. This is one t=
of the organization's primary purposes and they pursue this 24
hours a day, 365 days a year.
Ms. Fielder and Ms. Vardell passed around a some letters and
a poem some clients had written showing their appreciation for
services provided and also indicated that one client gave a plant
to the staff and volunteers at the shelter facility. Brochures
were also distributed around on counseling for abused, information {
on rape victims and on the batterers program this is not
exclusively a male program.
Mr. Truitt asked if the program would be possible without
state funding (batterers program).
Ms. Vardell stated that it would be almost impossible for the
program to continue without the battering3 prevention money.
However, it is safe to say that the agency is well committed to the
program, Damico therefore if would
were tgoing dtohalllfour somewhere. in
Denton.
Mt. Vardell said yes but, there are two main hospitals that
are meIntaining the referrals and calling the agency which is
Denton Community and Lewisville Memorial, the other hospitals do
not call with the same frequency as the two listed hospitals.
Ms. Damico questioned if the police go to all four of the
hospitals equally.
Me. Vardell replied that the police will be responding
within their ,jurisdiction. She stated the ER folks give them a
call more often than the police. It is possible that the agency
needs to do more outreach to the hospitals in order to increase the
number of referrals from all sources.
Mr. Bezdek asked who Friends of the Family rented their
facility from.
Ms. Vardell stated they have four facilities. The shelter
was donated to our agency by the Razors. The agency rents
the outreach office from Jimmy Brown and are currently renting
the Lewisville office from the Lewisville Leader and the thrift
shop is own by Fulton Industries in Denton Center.
Mr. Garrett asked whether there were 350 volunteers and how
many of volunteers are counselors.
Ms. Vardell stated they actually have 400 volunteers, the
question specifically asked for the number of volunteers working
.r
HSC Minutes
April 22, 1991 1
Page 14
with clients. There are 50 on the board and various other places
who are not having direct contact with clients. The 350 come and
go throughout the year and on an average month 100 volunteers
cooking on any given month. AlI of the volunteers are doing a wide
variety of things from transporting individuals from point a &
point B, hospital stay, sit with clients in the shelter, talking
with them, play cards, paint with them, take kids into small group
situations etc. The actual credential counselors are no more than
50 through the course of the year. This includes counselors
through the school programs, interns and professionals within the
community who are willing to donate their time.
Ms. Kriatoferson asked how did they make up the $16,000 taken
away by TOHS.
Ms. Vardell stated that they took with one hand and gave some
back through another. Also she stated she went begging to other
shelters who were getting more money and they agreed to even out
the amounts provided to shelters under the State's program. There
is therefor a sharing of the negative impact that the loss of
funding created. Also there were some budget cuts.
Mr. Bezdek asked how many clients could be served at one time
in the shelter.
Ms. Connor stated they could take 24 to 25 and the clients r,
stay there up to 30 days which is allowed. There are some {
exceptions if an individual is close to getting a job or
accomplishing major things the client's era given an
individual extension up to the maximum of two more weeks. The
client is also assisted in finding a job and are doing things to j
improve their situation.
Mr. Bezdek asked whether the shelter was always full and if
they had to turn away 150 people. He also asked for clarification
on the 1642 clients who were served, he assumed some of those were
provided with counseling.
Ms. Vardell stated they have good working relationships with
the Plano shelter and various other shelters in the territory
and the agency can refer to other agencies.
The representatives from Friends of the Family and Committee
members discussed the recent rehabilitation of the shelter with
assistance from the City under the Emergency Shelter Grant Program.
Ms. Vardell Invited Committee members to tour the shelter either
individually or in a group. Ms. Vardell went on to state that
people find out about the agency by calling the crisis tine which
is about 99 per cent who access the agency through the crisis line.
they come in for outreach, hospitals call, police, and other To
get to the shelter the clients are asked to meet at the police
station.
Mr. Garrett questioned if the agency had any association with
Twin lakes because they have a crisis center for women who have
been battered.
e
1
HSC Minutes
April 22, 199i
Page 16
Ms. Vardell replied no, that Twin Lakes is a full profit
hospital, and they conduct seminars for staff development at a
nominal cost.
Me. Damico asked if other agency funding sources require
evidence of support.
Ms. Vardell said all of their sources require evidence of
local support bota in terms of dollars and volunteers. Local
dollars can pull down two to three additional dollars.
Ms. Cowan asked how is the agency serving the
minority population. t%
Me. Vardell stated they keep their statistics in the community
to gauge service in relation to the demographics of the community
and although she feels they are doing a good job but, could always
do more. She mentioned there is a Denton County Task Force on
Family Violence and Sexual Assault. They are looking at dealing
specifically with minority assistance.
Ms. Damico introduced Paula Layton, Velma Schmidt and Gary
Cotton representing Fred Moore Child Care Center.
Me. Layton explained the services offered by Fred Moore to low
income families. She stated that AFDC and Food Stamp recipients I
were a priority. Parents had to be working or in school. The
Center is full most of the time. Fred Moore has become a vendor
under the Child Care Management System. They have received 4
children under that program. Most of the existing children at Fred
Moore were eligible when the program went into effect. A major
concern at the Center is remodeling the facility or moving. They i
fear that parents may prefer to take their children to flashier
centers. The school board will be meeting tomorrow night to make }
a decision on funding for rehab of the Center.
Ms. Schmidt added that the plans of DIED sound very promising.
It is possible they will renovate the old high school and the
daycare may be allowed to move there.
Ms. Damico asked if they would then rent the space from DISD.
Mr. Cotton explained yes at minimal amount like $1.00 per
year.
The Committee and representatives continued to discuss the
renovation of space for the daycare and the needs of the existing
facility. Me. Layton mentioned that they have been able to do some
maintenance on the facility and that they are in no danger of being
I rained on or having other major problems.
It Me. Holloway asked Me. Layton to address if Fred Moore was
meeting a specific need or why they are better able to serve the
need than a private daycare would.
Ms. Layton replied that their age limit began at 16 months
where City County starts at two years of age. One agency goat is
to start an infant room. Funds are in place to start the infant
room. Me. Layton mentioned there are few if any facilities in
1
1
d
i
h
HSC Minutes
April 22, 1991
Page 18
Denton that provide that type of care. Ms. Layton went on to y]
explain that eny daycare can apply to be a vendor under CCMS. She
stated many of the private daycares will not apply because they do
not wish to serve that type of client or deal with the State's
paperwork.
Me. Holloway asked why it is better for the children to attend
Fred Moore when all the clients are low income. She mentioned that j
she was an advocate of mainstreaming and that the children might
fare better under a system where there was a mix of income levels. i~
Me. Layton agreed but felt that the curriculum at Fred Moore
was far superior to most private daycares and that was beneficial
to the Fred Moore children.
Mr. Bezdek asked if the school district planned on getting
into this.
Ms. Layton said they have a Kids with Kids program and they
may be looking to place some of the children from that program with
the Center.
Ms. Atkins asked about the age range and hours.
Ms. Layton replied 18 months through 6 years and the hours
were 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM.
Ms. Ross asked for clarification on those families who do not
fall under CCMS. She asked if public daycares are receiving state '
subsidies that essentially mean they take in up to $54.00 per child
what is then the difference in financing for a public vs. a private
daycare. It seems as though the amounts received per child,
although from different sources are the same for public and private
daycares. will we continue to serve those children who do not fall
under the system?
MF;. Layton explained that she felt more families would be
served any many would be those who "fell through the cracks" of the
new system.
Ms. Ross if that would be part of the Center's policy. 1
Ms. Layton said the board was discussing this. City and
United way money would be needed here to match the copayment system
where children did not fall under the new system.
Ms. Ross asked if this was a greater supplement per child that
the old system (Title 20) was. J
Me. Layton said it was a little bit more. 1
Me. Damico asked if the figures provided by Fred Moore were
based on Titlo 20. j
Me. Layton explained that when she turned in her paperwork she
had not yet received her information on bubsidies. She stated a
correction could be made on cost for total unit of service, it
should be around $13.00.
Ms. Damico asked if Fred Moore was still taking children that
came through court services.
Ms. Layton replied yes.
The Committee continued to discuss the new CCMS program and
its effect on provision of services.
Me. Damico explained that the Committee would proceed to make
• ~ I
1
i
1
i
HSC Minutes
April 22, 1991 j
Page 17
preliminary recommendations and tnat they would need new numbers
from Fred Moore.
Ms. Layton agreed that she would provide them with additional
figures regarding State funding.
Ms. Dami co, asked what percentage of the children were from the
City of Denton.
Ms. Layton replied they all were.
Ms. Atkins asked if they were getting any calls for families
looking for late or all night service.
Me. Layton said a few but not many.
Ms. Damico asked the Committee to discuss how they felt about
funding of existing agencies. j
The Committee agreed they wished to continue to support
existing agencies but, wanted to wait until they had heard from all
r requesting agencies prior to making any decision on dollar amount.
Me. Damico noted that available funding would increase over last g probably not
year's numbers. She mentioned however, that a
new City Council would hear recommendations. The current Council
rated human services as a low priority for the next fiscal year.
She added that it was HSC's charge to let Council know what the
needs are within the City.
The Committee continued to discuss the low priority that
Council had assigned to human services. Ms. Damico reminded the
Committee that Denton does provide more funds for human services
Than other cities. Mr. 6ezdek mentioned that these are services
which are not traditional city services.
Ms. Damico asked the Committee if they wanted to request that
Handi-Hop and Span elderly transportation be added again to the
human services budget either as a separate budget or along with
human services.
The Committee discussed the issue and decided to delay further
discussion and a decision until the next meeting.
The meeting was adjourned.
i
i
J
i
I
1
i I
f
S
Z
ATTACHMENT III
Human Services Committee
Unofficial Minutes
May 6, ig9i
i
Committee Members Present: Dorothy Damico, Terrance Garrett, Gary s
Truitt, Barbara Atkins, Katy Dawson,
Sandy Kristoferson, Linda Holloway,
Jim Bezdek and Anita Cowan.
Staff Present: Barbara Ross
Dorothy Damico called the meeting to order at 4:10 PM.
Ms. Damico introduced Joyce Burk from the Community Food
Center. Ms. Burk summarized the operations of the Food Room. She
stated that the County supplies the building, the City supplies the
utilities and that churches, individuals, clubs and businesses like
Morrison Milling and Pillsbury supplied foc,*j donations. She Gtated
the Food Room was providing food for one week no more than three
times to i,dividuals and families in need. She mentioned that the
Boy Scouts and Greek Club have also provided food. The Food Room
supplements donations with purchases of hamburger and peanut
butter. Ms. Burk has a totally volunteer staff. The purpose of
the Food Room is to provide food free of charge to people on an
emergency basis. The organization's goal ie to add to what they're
currently doing by working with HOPE, Inc. and other organizations
who refer families to the rood Room. Over 2,900 families were
provided with food last year.
Ms. Damico asked how much the utility bills were running each
month.
Ms. Burk stated she was not sure but, that she had called the
utility company and they confirmed that $3,000.00 was a good
i
estimate.
Me. Ross stated that the Food Room's bill was paid
automatically through the City's accounting system.
Jim Bezdek inquired as to how Denton received food from
Tarrant County.
Me. Burk stated we were in their service area. She also
pointed out that the Food Room may begin to receive food from
Dallas County as well. She stated the food was not always what
they felt was appropriate but, they accepted it gratefully.
Gary Truitt asked who paid the phone bill. 1
Ms. Burk replied that the Food Room paid the bill but that the
phone company helped out with printing costs. In reference to the
budget she stated that funds are donated to the Food Poom and she
spends those for food. The amount listed under food provided by
Tarrant County is their estimated value of the food. Me. Burk
stated she felt their estimate was high.
Terrance Garrett asked if Ms. Burk knew how Tarrant County
arrived at that figure.
Ms. Burk said no, probably around seventy cents per item. She
felt this was high.
Sandy Kristoferson asked what the Food Room would have to do
to qualify for food from Dallas County.
Ms. Burk replied that they would need to add an extra hour of
1
r
i d
i
1
HSC Minutes
May 6, 1991
Page 2 1
operations per day. She is currently looking for volunteers who
loading and unloading.
Barbara Ross asked how often food had to be picked up.
Me. Burk stated they pick up from Ft. Worth once a month,
Pillsbury twice a month and then at other times.
Mr. Garrett asked what specific assistance she received from
the churches.
Ms. Burk stated almost all of the churches have food drives.
She added they were looking for recipes that don't call for items r;
which aren't available to these families. The Food Room doesn't
provide things like eggs and other perishables.
Anita Cowan asked how old you had to be to receive asaistance. +
Ms. Burk said usually only adults come in but that they will
provide food to anyone.
Ms. Kristoferson asked about the screening process.
Ms. Burk replied that the families must have an I.D. and are
asked several questions. Personnel recheck the cards and after a
family or individual has been in three times they are no longer
provided with food. They are encouraged to get food stamps etc.
Ms. Burk did mention that even though individuals may have been
served three times she at least provides them with a sandwich, she
feels they shouldn't go away empty handed. i~
Ms. Cowan asked if there were any Spanish speaking volunteers.
Ms. Burk said no, that was one thing they lacked. It would
be a great advantage to have someone who spoke Spanish.
Ms. Damico stated that Me. Burk had agreed to give the job six
months and that the Committee should encourage her to stay. She
was doing a wonderful job.
Ms. Burk stated the position was really rewarding but, she
want to do everything at once and patience is difficult to come by.
Barbara Atkins applauded Ms. Burk's efforts to reassess need
and make changes in the agency according to that information. She
asked what was the total number of clients who wore turned away
over a year's time.
Me. Burk stated there are not many who don't get something.
There are however abusers who are asked not to return. No figures
were available that would adequately answer Ms. Atkins' questions. I
Me. Damico asked who chaired their board.
Me. Burk stated their chair was Ed Morrison.
Ms. Damico asked if the Food Room had any difficulty keeping
the records required by the City.
Ms. Ross stated that the information requested from the Food '
Room was actually lose than what was required from other agencies
but that may change with the next contract.
Ms. Burk stated she would be happy to provide any information
regarding finances or beneficiaries when needed. She stated she
wanted to develop written guidelines on Food Room processes.
Ms. Damico asked if the board was aware that she felt a need
for guidelines.
1
1
s
i
HSC Minutes
May 6, 1991
Page 3 1
Ms. Burk stated that the Food Room Board was aware of her work
in this area.
Me. Damico thanked Me. Burk for her presentation.
Ms. Damico then introduces Paul King, Director of AIDenton and
Richard Sale, Board President.
Mr. King explained the funding for AIDenton. He stated that
the organization needed to verify that they had community based
support and demonstrate this to federal and state agencies. He
stated that the disease is not going away, Information has reached
the male to male group but women and people of color were still
very vulnerable to the disease.
central location. Mr. King stated they now had a
Mr. Sale continued to talk about the organization and his
involvement. He stated that he became involved with AIDenton
because six years ago his own son had died of the disease. He
explained that he attempted to bring his eon home but Denton was
not able, at that time, to provide any services. His son's final 1
days were spent in New York City where services were available.
At that time Dallas and Ft. Worth were moving quickly to counter
the disease, but Denton had not yet begun any effort. Mr Sale
pointed out that there were three levels of service being provided
by AIDenton:
1. HIV testing at Denton Regional Hospital.
The testing is confidential and anonymous.
2. Education proper to church groups, community
groups etc. Five speakers have been
trained to give the course.
3. Wellness groups for HIV positive and all
those who have come in contact with the
disease. Each group meets weekly and sometimes
together.
Mr. King mentioned development of a new test where newborns
are tested. Unfortunately, new information considers women of
childbearing age to be those women/girls age nine (9) and up.
Mr. Sale stated that the agency had a governing board. Bob
Powers acts as CPA for the agency and Paul King as Executive
Director. Denise Frank is Volunteer Coordinator. The Board meets
once a month.
Me. Damico asked if clients have telephone access at all
times.
Mr. Sale and Mr. King explained that the new office was at St.
Barnabas Episcopal Church, The agency files and phone are located
there. The phone is answered by staff during office hours and a
message machine is available for incoming calls after office hours.
Messages are returned within 48 hours.
Me. Kristoferson requested clarification regarding the number
of persons contacted. The number listed on the AIDenton
questionnaire was 5,400 but it lists that only 338 have beeii
served.
i
1
HSC Minutes
May 6, 1991
Page 4
Mr, King noted that the 338 reflected those persons actually
receiving service, the 6,400 is the number reached through
educational programs.
Ms. Kristoferson asked if AIDenton felt they had educated
8,300 persons and are those numbers increasing
Mr. King said yes they felt they had reached e,8'!0 persons
with educational information. He also stated that the mslb to male
contact was at one time 100% of the infected population. The rate
of infection in that group has now leveled off. Women and people
of color now make up 30% of that group and that will probably
continue to increase. He added that the numbers in Denton County
are misleading because many potential clients go to Dallas or Ft.
Worth for testing. Also, some local doctors may not report or even
tell the patient that they have the disease because they do not
want it to show up in the patient file,
Mr. Truitt asked if treatment is available in Donton.
Mr. King said there is no cure or treatment. Treatment is
through the emergency room.
Ms. Kristoferson asked if AlDenton worked with Ann's Haven at l)
all.
Mr. King said yes through educational pursuits and care of HIV
clients who go through the hospice.
Mr. Garrett commented on the fact that the Board was elected {
by dues paying members.
Mr, King explained that the bylaws state dues paying members
elect the board. Dues are $10.00 annually. The Board has monthly j
and an annual meeting, The Nominations Committee puts the slate
before the group at the annual meeting.
Ms. Cowan asked if the education course was successful in
reaching 6th graeirs or junior high school students.
Mr. King stated he did not have access to any figures that
would provide that information.
Ms. Cowan inquired as to whether they met with young people
in organizations or in the schools,
Mr. King replied they worked through the schools. He praised
DIED for their support. DISD has a good program for AIDS ,
prevention.
Me. Cowan asked if there were any younger children in Denton
who have contractod AIDS through transfusions and was there any
problem with their pursuit of education through the DIED system.
Mr. King said there were two but they were not yet in the
public school system.
Linda Holloway mentioned that she recently reviewed some
information for non-verbal AIDs clients. She stated she would be
happy to provide it to AIDenton if they would like it.
Mr. Sale emphasized that fcr the future of the agency they
needed to prove to granting organizations that they have support
from the City.
i
f
v
HSC Minutes
May 6, 1991
Page b
Ms. Damico asked if they had made any attempts to document what
dollar amount they can get per dollar of community funds.
Mr. King stated that most organizations don,t want to provide
the major portion of the budget. They also like for the amount of
your request to decrease over a period of time because you are
receiving additional funds from other sources. Currently, they are
trying to find funds to replace other grants and aggressively
seeking federal funds for gap services. United Way has also asked
Menton to apply for funding again.
Me. Damico asked if the multiple bookkeeping required by
multiple grants was difficult to maint4in and did they have the
personnel to do this.
Mr. King stated they were looking for some software that could
do this for them.
Ms. Gemico asked if they hold fundraisers for donations.
Mr. King explained they did a mailout to 3,000 residents.
Unfortunately the mailout only paid for itself. The other half of
the donations they receive are from individuals. The Meadows
foundation in particular wanted to see evidence that we had
disseminated agency information and the mailout accomplished this.
Me. Kristoferson asked how large the Board was.
Mr. King replied the Board had 11 members. t
Me. Damico inquired as to the =4000.00 in the "other"
category on the budget portion of the questionnaire.
Mr. King stated that was for travel and telephone as well as
personnel development.
Me Atkins asked is free bloodtesting was donated to the
agency.
Mr. King explained that they asked the Tarrant County Health
Department if they could offer blood testing here and they said
yes. Denton County is also new offering some testing. He went on
to state that there was a strong referral system within the County.
Most HIV persons feel they'll be provided with services, they do
not realize that they must get into a support group and help one
another to accomplish those things they previously did alone.
Me. Damico thanked Mr. Sale and Mr. King for the additional
information they provided.
Ms. Damico proceeded to introduce Sara Carey, Director of the
Prenatal Clinic for Denton County.
Me. Carey discussed the funding request from the Prenatal
Clinic. She summarized the health care problems in Denton.
There basically is none for the indigent population. The Prenatal
Clinic has served 1600 pregnant women in less than three years.
They have surpassed their original
plans. They are now working on
pediatric care, working with teenage mothers so that they won't
repeat their pregnancy. Me. Carey has hired a 3/8's Pediatric
practitioner and a 3/6's pediatric nurse. These individuals can
bell medicaid for their services. This system is working well.
VIM
g
HSC Minutes M,
May 6, 1991
Page 6
is virtually no other accessoned
There in Denton for
i tothathealth care
children. it is also difficult to
get "good" Ms . Carey also ment numbers from the Texas Department of Human Services or
the Texas Department of Health but there are
medicaid and another 21100 who have given up orsrcould 3not0get
services.
Ms. Kristoferson asked if the pediatricians here accepted
Medicaid.
Me. Carey replied that some do, during the months of December,
January, and February, 20 kids were accepted under medicare (office
visits). She stated it was also difficult to differentiate between
office and emergency room visits. The citizens of Denton are
paying an enormous premium for emergency room care. Ms. Carey
stated she would work to get better numbsra - those that reflect
the true need. She feels that Denton County should be declared to
have a medically underserved population, It is people on medicaid
who are underserved.
Ms. Kristoferson asked is tF;e Clinic could meet its budget on
medicare alone.
Ms. Carey said no but there is a federal Look-Alike
which would pay reimburse up to i00% of costs. Tn order to qualify
for this program program
medically underser ed Populawould tion.haMo.t Carey elsc+mentioned thata
N,awton Razor is giving a house on University Dr, where they will
f
put there pediatric care, childbirthing classes, clothing room etc
She stated they were always in need of more money and more help.
Me. Atkins asked if the Clinic had anything in the works for
birthing.
Me. Carey stated they were submitting a
Department of Education to pilot a birthing center option. The
want to see if it is coat effective and if itrworks ofor® the
population. They currently have money for the facility. There
also a midwife school at Parkland where training is available. is
Dr. Cummings and Dr. Bosley currently work with the Clinic for some
deliveries.
Me. Kristoferson had a further question regarding birthing and
its effect on funding for the City and County.
Ms. Carey said that it would not affect funding, as a matter
of fact the County has mandated that the Clinic work toward a
birthing center as a requirement for continued funding.
Me. Kristoferson asked would they carry liability.
Me. Carey said no.
Me. Kristoferson asked why the clinic did not have any
volunteer support staff.
Me. Carey stated that they have volunteers who answer the
phone and help with billing but there is no continuity. The Job
the volunteers do is tremendous and they stay very busy but the
Clinic needs some continuity.
Me. Cowan asked if there were any Clinic policy regarding
w
..4
}
I
HSC Minutes
may 6, 199f
Page 7
minimum time for volunteers.
Ms. Carey stated most volunteers stay all morning
hours,
Mr. Truitt inquired as or about 4
questionnaire as pa to what the $14,0o0 listed
Ms. Care explained was paying for, on the
medicaid because they that some patients are
much. The Clinic Y make "too much money". The not seen on
which pays also tries to get aliens on y copay untome but not
pronatal, y indigence
Mr. Truitt mentioned that he was surprised to see such a large
amount of money in that category.
The Committee members expressed their a Carey 'a determination and dedication. Apreciation for Ma,
rr Ms. Care y
questionnaire read the following statement from the Clinic's
The provision of health care for the medically underserved must be viewed as critical component
to the overall health and vitality of the
community. In its absence, all of our systems,
public and private (i,e, schoole, taw enforcement,
Penal, employment, tax au
diminished. Thank you againrforaconsidering and
application which enable us, at least g our
to
annual report to you about the state of make
health in Denton. Until the residents of the City
of Denton have access to medical are that is at
least equal to their access to police and fire
protection and to City parks and recreation we
will continue to apply for whatever funding seems
to be available,
The Committee thanked Ms. Carey for her presentation.
The Committee first discussed funding for Axistin agencies
Additional information concernin
Care Management System was diecg the daycares and the ow Child'
Committee Would have approximatel Ms' Rose confirmed thayear according to City staff, y the snme budget amount as last
Gary Truitt pointed out that the budget has increased only a
actualmall a ounthsince198a. services You figure amount of Jim Bezdek asked if Parents Anonymous for inflation, the
spending has decreased.
Me. Cowan said no. applied again.
Mr. Truitt asked if the excess money could be
year's budget,
Ms- Ross explained that the 2,70 all to put into next
Anonymous would have to be reallocated and spentcthis fiscal
Parents
or it would be lost.
reeF
I
~ . >i:, i i'6bu .:.1`„.~. e.v':b~w~7c.rJi l~i!hid Y,WaSM,'..~tAi'ii`..r3`ti~Y.'~.S~T..i~f.Yc.~
. _ ..e v ~ •+~iHA N4.a~U7l ~i,k,kA.... +.lc eliS,kF.,N,..'4 ..R,~~S.. _!L.r s a.,. t~~.. ,..a, .e~ rvure r.'a r w.. ..,e,
„d.ft ~,fw .SrnZ4~a".~?. hl'swli:', .~#~F'«Si.,X. u$A ~'w^tiK. a.7 h.!?.`;•145~~'
yy TFt '
u
j a
r' I
k
TNJI ADJA ONT I'*A WTY 11
Ar.
TABULATIONS G0"~'" ~ 1 ~ d111pROW
tTAL sill Ath If-so esces 111,+40 11
rpm MY
Z~
IT1117 TRIP (not tAelVsisp puLalpl flop? IMAM IOTU "s__
41,411 al 104330 If Is? 000 as Its? IAAD LApw41lp0
V ItpII190 Itdl If tell) street Ia6f +.I+s of 10,114 if $0,405 It I I FROVIVIR (Not laeiedlol pllswapl I61495r(543)
Is,lbo it III%) Id, q96 4P (6?V
S PNOVIDep (escfodlAq 1661e41td fire I del)
IetMablf;4ru t I.s (i501I 1190 ('St e~ 103,3h5~f 5~ r' y of PIDt1~10 (toclodlll patlnp) QI 4ir(4°JA 11.16% of
(Asti it 0 6$10 ~+1' s~
i~ V, . WAN LW FfNef
PAL IAA1110 $Till? TAXI Alto Ipaiking span and?I 110 610 $PP
TAL PARKING WA ITR917 IAID 01A (pachtaq spice soft) I2.11)0 at ~
A)MIY0 ALA LOPSCA1100 Ip11ing spice snip) - 0A Q
itllt? TAXD provillp ISI) Sbo 6F Lo ITAttl TAND MOVIDtD 35,40 4IN (2A%)
j XON STIttT TAR) ICQUTAID (el) tAAPP6-%W R'V~'21tCol 9uuISlII~t1M1JIMl- - t _1111.IQtfII UYfER!
Ids el y i MOM NTRItt VAR) FADVIDID 56S al U.at) `PROMTED Togs$ Of IL?t 110 or grelletf II 1 1
/ ' r . P~?v?FA~ r A>1.1"cab 1 Lilt 011 • "d. IV/ 1' Im pprt /fern { 1 tNq f 31 Llrt Ott d <41, I'll. MUFF grow tIIN 1
tt., Irtdlofd Far 1 Col. Oki 3 ItrolSlt troat krhity 1 •
v r 1/ a / I~ p S. ,tr`rt en 4 Nntlt ly nL U'! 1' trill 9404 4d41aa1 1 Nro4I+ 1 j 1 ' L
ly ° ~T~VO HEiGNr t
p v v ~ ~ ~ I ~ 111 IpalGtt jraal ~ ~~f1rl' ?~Hli`~I~ S' 1 t. Si~NU01~
PROTIC7to TIRE IN mill 1AAD SS C"4t1 {urtatl~allt S il, IVA$* r S' 1 h i 111411 l 210 Lltt4p "IN nif d" rot ratI
u• its. 'io•ryu~ I
fROTICIgo ?Mm to STRICT VAIb TO AD011 rIDTCCIII 70116 14 ITRQT 1AAp TO IC AIMOVID 0 y a l
-LtE or sliaElt 1~. prti 413 Itadutp atu at gaLiltl of sltt/ of Sawdr Aia.J att se4tM ¢14rM ost 1lIN;l1 tli of
MOTICTED TART 00 $]to to Fl AtN IO 1 R1tiT~. I'l"MII "to& 00 sill to It IJDvVt6 4~ a~0/ r \~1 1 y
*u` \ p \ !~1 \ N Dawdtttru)tdrautel tt►ieal 4tlMEuvad r14t1 w tipdtOLirM~ItH1.,
M- 1• 1
ItT TRAD 1041 ptpNRfMlN?I ( y
1N~IPSIta catitep walwaot ss > 4 / j to9Tloto 6Z A.." ~ ,y ice.
! flit CRIDIT (Of 1 Ap1A10110 PROTIC?ED "tog a w
"?AL ITRRT )App TRIMS FXOV1Dti 60 y \ 1
TOTAL ?Fits PIOVIDto ON gill fkecloding eon street pad) 65 1
CONCRETE PAYING
r
GENERALyNOtES V ~
it
P,-44\ i, INS OWNER 11,01911 TO MAINTAIN LANDSCAIt ON AWtTINJ PMKrAT -
I( I. ALL LANDSCAPE AAlA1 AIUf?tNG FARMING LOTS 04 VtMICOLAA VJt Al1A1 SMALL It I 41
FNOTICTS1y111T1 CUIes, FAININC CLOCKS Do SIMILAR SAAAHMS AUPFICIEXT TO b
F"CT TMDI tool VRICULAA 1NTPUSIOR.
"yJ. ALL LANDSCAPINO SMALL It CONSTRUCTED, INSTALLED AND NAINTAIVID So AS ACS TO
.i k 014TIUCT TKI V1EM OF MOTORISTS I9T41EM TMI ITIRIT AND THE ACCI$S DRIVIS IND y PARM110 AISL96 IRAN TMR STICK? VAAD 9%TAItI AND WITI.
Prat SMALL A1V LAND- p R
SCANNO NNICS CISATIS AN 015TAUC?ION of VIM It LOCATED IN TN1 RADIUS Of ANY
(VMS RETURN. 'y
y 4, ?R ONNDI ACAIIS ?0 MAINTAIN 101 RIQVIIRD TAtR, LANDSCAPE ARIAS AID A 11
I01101K4 DtVJRI 10 GOOD CONDITION AND SMALL O?NtAMfSC MAINTAIN TMI ?Not- nTV to AS TO COMPLY MITN ANY OlI1N PCQUIDEMPNTS or TAE DEATON LAAD6CAP1
I y ~ % jx-
I OADINAXCI.
11 S. ALL LANDSCAPE ARIAS SMALL It TARIOATID IT AI AUTOMATIC UNDENGROUNP SPPJMKLER 'AD/ • J ' ~ti.
SYSTEM ICCIR TMOR AAµ1 RNICN AAt LOCATED MITMIK TM1 FLOOD PLAIM.
J,.
Lte OF ITIEET YARD--- / 1
s-'
e - 1
~ I I e;
MENOMONEE
TWIS ADJAGFNI N?tOMRTY 11 es XoNtp 'A'
111/IDENTIAL
1
- '
1- ~
TREE PROTECTION NOTES
Vraa lAdlestld on the silo plan to be 96es11144 rill be =
protected by fencfbg Offer to beginning 461 tonstrrvdlna activity and kept in place until eonRtuctlon If coegletb
penetal will coeglele)p aurtawd the tots at claLerl of
trees and will be located at the outetserl limits of the ties + clown(s) or ditpisne. Peaeing will be tonattotled of
Vstefials which will be adequate to parent the Isltovtn+l
1. Moil eoapedlon resulting lees vehicle traffic or e 1.
storage as equtpneal or supplies,
1 1. toot tons dlNulbaace duo to grads changes (greater than 6 raehes cut or fill) of trenching.
1. wowds to apoaod claim, ttunl at title by Mich , CO\ K
4. ethos lett111111 El,etruotll t0 tells Such 11
ehllltat Jtanp,-naaat track llualht Ind tuls.
t ♦ t rv~4 rM I
II ' 1 1
r 1 STREET YARD LANDSCAPE
• F(1LLR1 RAYMONQ CQNS ~J `i y i
.r 1 a L~
n 1 ll♦ 6J ~i~~ .
~I ♦?Al1U~J.7 Ali, ~ LP~~ ~ ~ . , ,
0jI IN IA ~ ~>oG • J, 0A ti
it - - tl 1 +~1 4,l d~#9l 4y J.~ ° w`S . 1
~ i 4• ~IVEAtV~' rluGttf~ 'r {
P ~ s w C. • •19 I d y r.
41 Ie % C
Y ,
N. 11124 fJ11d' . r / I r~y ly , v, ~ v, 4.
w 77 i i.
Y I . ~~ry`(r , y, < j~_l y 1r ~d r(Yt, t~~rl♦ r/' I ~.IR~( ~ ~ 4Y, d.S'B•'.ryr }Yyft t~,~~±~ 'q 'aT,~ t,'l d;~(!.<,.
c .z JO' ILIOtNb AATI
Y • M
Itr ~A6cE~~ v1416 ' 3 ` ' C Y' a' Y l vTr~ t~ t
1 1 I t , ( ,r w tra vi d'e+; r1l
C4"N UNG FWCZZa . 1 IAj Q0s r ,1 y i,~ 'G a r 1
r 4 I
Si+ ! y f , !r t 4 r ` ~ a ~ la < ill Sa C I ~ fi' q}y r~.r~ ~
11• JF eA06 ~e%A 1 - art a Rcw'o~ Iy1 wJ~~l~ poAV ; ~ t~' r ' 1 ~ ! ' 13" ~ p 1' F N" t ~~y ~ ~ I,T ti `
j,.
or A-m-WA
- ) y !.t I ht ♦ is ~ t f }r
1Y .R5/r t R( ter. , ♦ , N y ( %'l~, ~i .~Ir rr e~r'
I l ~ ✓ ~ 1 1Fp1 ADJAClN1 P1101'[RTT II , , ~ ' 1 _ r y Y
I n i C t h. r'r aM'xJ' v,+.,y <J e,
M16101N11AL ~ y . ~ U1j ADIYi~IK ~ ; ~`i
~ ~ vs~ rly~ty~8 ~C R7"~~, {~.Cf~. •F+ .~:„.FA , 1!~6t{.
~,.y J ~ fy ,rMj ~~..•~~~,~,~,rlnl~~ # ei 1a
i
7/ , J
tN bk/II~Iar 4 ;yl±~Y rj~V f `7rf J r a S rvl v ~~9r , +143'rg114
t W1~V ~ fj9uAWCHI~Y/ V ~v - p # i '.ire y TJyC<c,16,' Q r7 r <r+y, t, trR + ^ LANK ' -.:4 d`v~ 5,~y, a,
r ! a'.t a ♦ .~N. rl O ■ 4a#*' 't' r •<y ~4'~l~i\ld
. l
l J AIL 111, 1~~71'L In t7 '
' r fyy y1 tr
• 1~ y r ( r , {nfi + ~',rY 'I,rl<' It" ° r t Yf, ety 1 `
7 n rr~i ~idrA.~.wn 11 ' 7 }t ~t Y 5r} J~ D, it {<n~~• `P4~~rF ,•k.'<( R~' t
E NHM'u'Y SUN' e , I , ' I + C d 1 J n i~'~ 3x 4RZ:~~~•r~ -2 r~x; 'y,•
~ rr
T n t t, i y,
I I 1 site Id~ / low
11x1 ADJA 64 IIROIILRTT N M" 'A'
I
fd
t
JJ~ !
y
k, + P .
~f'
Z
^r .
y_
4
k
f 1
HSC Minutes
may 8, 1991
Page e
Mr. Ltezdek moved that the Committee ask Council to reallocate
the funds.
Me. Cowan explained that Parente Anonymous' funding from the
Texas Department of Human Services was continuing to be reduced.
P.A. felt that they were not oeing funded adequately and could not
continue under the current circumstances.
Dorothy Damico stated it was unfortunate to see good efforts
and but felt the Committee should move on Mr. Bezdek's motion.
Katy Dawson asked if the reallocation hod to go through
Council.
Ms. Ross said yes,
The Committee voted unanimously to ask Council that the money
be reallocated to those agencies whose budgets had been reduced in
901-91' In order to fund Parente Anonymous. Those agencies were
Friends of the Family, RSVP and SPAN (social services).
Me. Damico then asked Committee members to consider what the
911-92' recommendations should be. She asked if anyone had read
anything in the additional information that would cause them to
change their funding recommendation on the daycares.
Mr. Truitt stated he was not sure he understood all the
implications of the new legislation and Child Care Management
System (CCMS).
Me. Damico stated that her perception was that Fred Moore and
City County have no idea of its impact on their budget. She
continued that she would like to fund them through next year and
that perhaps they would then have a better idea of how the system
was affecting their budget.
Linda holloway mentioned the fact that these are City tax
dollars and what if the daycares refused to service people who did
not fall into the CCMS system.
Me. Atkins stated that she felt the daycares would see an
increased number of people who were eligible for childcare
assistance and this would greatly increase the numbers of potential
clients.
Me. Holloway again stated that those would be the ones the
daycares would receive full reimbursement from. What about those
that fell "between the cracks".
Me. Kristoferson agreed there may be families who make too
much money to qualify but are still low income and may not be able
to afford childcare.
Me. Atkins stated that it should be in the agency's contract
with the City that families not eligible for CCMS not be refused
service if they met the other agency eligibility guidelines.
Me. Holloway noted she would like to see the figures on those
who are barely making a living and not able to pay anything for
childcare.
Ms. Holloway makes a motion to include in City contract that
t
e
"
HSC Minutes
May 6, 1991
Page 9
families not eligible for CCMS not be denied service. 7
Ms. Dawson seconded the motion.
The Committee voted unanimously to request this,
Ms. Damico again requests that the Committee consider
allocation recommendations for next year, She noted that if the
Committee votes to recommend increased funding for the Community
Food Center or funding for the Prenatal Clinic and AIDenton that
existing agencies would have to be cut,
Ms. Dawson pointed out that the $2,700 from Parente Anonymous
would be available to fund additional agencies.
Ms. Damico stated she felt that would go back to the three
agencies from which it was originally taken.
The Committee continues to discuss use of the $20700.
The Committee also discussed developing what they considered I
the "ideal" (based on need) budget and then a second budget at last
year's budget figure. It was agreed by members to provide
preliminary recommendations which they felt best fit the needs of
the community. They would reduce those figures if specifically
requested by Council to do so.
Mr. Bezdek suggested that the Committee take the 1989 budget
figures for all existing agencies, give $3,000 to the food Room,
and provide 1/2 of the request for the Prenatal Clinic and
AIDenton, $6,000 and $6,000 respectively. The proposed budget
total would be $120,800. This would represent a 10% increase over +
last year's budget.
Mr. Truitt seconded the motion.
The Committee's vote was unanimous to accept the motion.
Me. Damico stated she had also spoken with Al Murdock, #
Director of SPAN regarding the transportation issue. Mr. Murdock
had informed her that the City wanted to assign a staff person in
the City Manager's Office to make funding recommendations.
Mr. Truitt stated that he was concerned about Handi-Hop being
the creation of the Human Services Committee and how they had even
previously handled complaints regarding the service. He said he
felt the Committee believed that a Transportation Committee would
be set up to handle all transportation and yet, this had not been
done.
Me. Dawson stated that she believed the Committee gave up
transportation issues because it was eating into the human services
funding.
Ms. Rose explained that the current budget process for Handi-
Hop and SPAN elderly transportation services would be simply a
staff recommendation based on budget and not necesztrily human
services issues.
Me. Damico said that transportation was not food and clothing
but, in these instances it was a human services issue.
J
1
1
I
h
rJ
e
r°-
HSC Minutes
May 8, 1991
Page 10 i
Discussion continued on the transportation issue.
Ms. Damico asked if there were other comments.
Mr. Bezdek asked why elderly and Handi-Hop transportation had
been removed from the Committee's jurisdiction.
Ms. Damico stated that the Committee was told transportation
was going to become a separate entity with a separate citizen's
committee and that it had previously been eating into human service
dollars.
Me. Dawson mentioned that she was not on the Committee when
it was decided that transportation was eating into human services
dollars.
Me. Damico pointed out that Siandi-Hop services are so vast
that the City's contribution does not cover total cost.
Me. Dawson asked if the Committee had not wanted to protect
Handi-Hop.
Ms. Damico replied yes but not at the expense of food and
clothing.
Mr. Bezdek asked for a clarification of why the Committee
would want it back.
Me. Damico reiterates the argument that the elderly receive
a disproportionate amount of the City's funding based on their
actual numbers in the population.
Mr. Truitt stated that this gives the Committee a chance to
give input on these decisions. He then moved that Handi-Hop and
SPAN's elderly transportation services be reincorporated into the
Human Services Committee's budget.
Mr, Garrett seconded the motion.
The Committee voted 7 in favor of the motion with one
abstention.
f 1
Ms. Damico asked for input on how to present the
recommendations to Council on the 219t.
Mr. Bezdek stated his appreciation of Ms. Damico's efforts and
( the excellent Job she always did representing the Committee,
j Other Committee members agreed. I
Not Damao mentioned that in particular she would like to
include information regarding how much money from outside the area
is included in their budgets.
Ms. Kristoferson mentioned that she was disappointed that
Ann's Haven had support from Lewisville but not Denton, and they
were based in Denton.
Other discussion continued on presentation of recommendations
to the Council.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:60 p.m.
1
i
r
Y
RESOLUTION NO. ~ Tll~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
RECOGNIZING THE PETITION OF FLOW REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. TO
BE DESIGNATED AS THE RECIPIENT NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION TO CONTINUE
EXISTENCE AND ADMINISTER ASSETS IN LIEU OF DISSOLUTION OF THE
FORMER FLAW MEMORIAL HOSPITALI AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, in December, 19901 Flow Regional Medical Center, Inc.
(the "Center") filed with the District Court a plea in intervention
and a motion requesting that the center be designated as the
recipient organization to continue existence and administer assets
in lieu of dissolution of the former Flow Memorial Hospital) and
WHEREAS, in the above-referenced motion, the Center advised
the Court that Flow's assets presently consist of cash in excess of
$250,000 and a note receivable for $1,900,000 and that the Center
is the proper recipient organization to administer these assets and
carry out the intent of the H.E. Flow Will and provide, insofar as
it can, for the health care needs of all the people of the City of
Denton and Denton County, Texas regardless of their ability to pay
for such care) and
WHEREAS, the Council is advised that the Center may request
that it be designated as the recipient organization of the assets
of the Flow Foundation, which presently consists of approximately
one million dollars) and
WHEREAS, over the years, the City receives, oh an annual
basis, many requests for funding from agencies who provide health
related services in the City and there have been, and will continue
to be inadequate tax dollars to grant these requests and provide
funding) and
i
WHEREAS, the Council wishes to commend the Center for taking
steps to ensure that the above-mentioned funds will be distributed
to nonprofit agencies providing health care services located within
the City and the County regardless of their ability to pay for such
care, and thus, establishing a significant resource for agencies
providing health care services to the citizens of the City) and
WHEREAS, the Council wishes to express that it does not wish
to object to the Motion filed by the Center, and indeed, views the
requested designation as the commencement of a new era in health
care funding in Denton by the Center's taking a lead role as the
primary funding resource for non-profit health care agencies) and
I
i
I
'J6
i
WHEREAS, in making a determination not to pursue an objection
to the Center's motion, the City Council believes it appropriate to
also relinquish its role as a direct provider of funds for health
related services in the future; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
SECTION I. That the City Council commends the Center for
taking positive steps to ensure available funds to provide for the
future health care needs of the citizens of Denton, regardless of
their ability to pay.
SECTION Ii. That the city Council recognizes the Center as ,ry
taking over the role of the City in providing resources for non-
profit agencies providing health care to citizens of Denton
regardless of their ability to pay.
SECTION III. That this resolution shall become effective
j immediately upon its passage and approval. i
PASSED AND APPROVED this the,' day of 19914
BOB CASTL
EBERRY, MAYOR
~ I
ATTEST;
I JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY {
t
BYt
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt
l DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BYE .L
'I
i
PPGE 2 j
J
r
27
City of Denton City Council Minutes
April 2, 1991
Page 3
Council Member Trent asked if the City was providing health
care services tot people who worked for the City that the City
really did riot need to. For example, part-time people,
seasonal people.
Klinck replied that seasonal people were not provided benefits
and the pact-time people paid a proportionate share of the cost.
Council Member Trent asked if that caused the rates to go up.
Klinck replied no.
City Manager Harrell stated that the Employee insurance C
Committee was very active in this area. The employees
satisfaction in this area was less than satisfactory.
Consensus of the Council was to proceed with a formal contract
with Coopers 6 Lybrand.
3. The Council received results and held a discussion
cegatding the 1991-92 Budget Priorities Questionnaire.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that the budget process
always started with the priorities of the City CouncLl.
Council had received the survey results ranked in order,
xvecyone had returned a questionnaire but not everyone answered e
all of the questions,
Council Member Ayer indicated a problem with this type of
questionnaire in that some judgments were done on what aught to
be done and then some decisions were done on what the City
could do. It tended to be contusing,
City Manager Harrell stated that in spite of its imperfections,
the survey gave the start a general feel for where the Council
had its priorities. Harrell taw another tight budget year and s
{ a difficulty in raitLng the tax rate due to the economy and
taxpayer resistance to an inccesse, The Freeport Amendment
would be activated this year which was a decrease of 1360,000
in the budget. Street programs had a high ranking which needed
to be explored so a budget issue. That* was a possibility of a
street only bond issue. 1991 would be the end of the C1P
project except for the four building projects, Municipal Court
and the Municipal Court of Records was listed at the top of the
~liet, funding for human service agencies was ranked 3.06 which
was just under current level funding. Harrell expected staff
to report to the Human Services Committee that they should
expect the same level of funding with no major increases in
funding, Major issues tot the budget would include a review of
take-hose police vehicle policy and an reexamination of the
whole athletic program funding with general budget funds, An
area which went down in the tanking was economic development
incentives.
i
a
DATE= QS/21/91
CITY COUNCIL REPORT AORMAT
TOs ~ ~/~j
V~
Mayor and Members of the City Council'
PRONJ Lloyd V. R:rrell, City Manager
SUBJECTS LAND USE REGULATION AMENDMENTS
RECONN-ONi P
j
' 16 Discuss two ordinance amendments concerning
I
as Conditioned zoning, Piz recommends approval,
p
b. Sidewalk axce tions(a), P" ftcOmoonds approval,
14 Provide comments on the preliminary recommendationsetau! mayor
i
tenants of the toning ordinance re-write. '
SUMAAY~
f See item in Council packet and attachment 1.
8AC AO ND1
See Item in Council packet. '
AOOAAM DEPAATMENTB OR GROUPS AFFECTED! i ~y'
Planning and Development
FISCAL IMPACTS
Nona i
X(*ulaltY subm di
Aft"Ped Lloyd V. Hrell
P City Managst
L J Ai C
Executive e Director
Attachment) toning Ordinance Task Force Recommendations
26SSx
j
i
4
r
ATTACHMENT 1
' ZONING ORDINANCE TASK FORCE
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Create 'user friendly' document,
2. Add standards and narrow the list of uses in some zoning
districts. The new standards would more precisely
regulate the character of development,
3. Create new, less intense commercial and industrial
districts with varying scales of development intensity,
i
4. Adopt conditioned zoning to enable site specific, easy,
fine tuning of development to the specific site. (Under i
consideration.) iI
5, Develop performance standard based, intensity sensitive,
mixed use districts that would enable a more direct
relationship between comprehensive plan policy and !
zoning district standards,
6, Develop overlay standards for special places, such as
around the airport# along plains and forests, and in the arterial business district
7, Amend the PD article to enable a closer relationship
between the public review process and the private {
development process. (Adopted)
8. Procedural ,
a. Review drafts with Planning and zoning and Council
before holding public hearings,
b. Make notice by mail to affected landowners and
enable their comment before changing standards or
I processes of the zoning districts that they own.
I
3227a/3
~ j
1
T r . i~~1
J
111 I
r :
t a
A4_y
CITY of DINTON, TEXAS 215 E. MCK1NNEVI DENTON, TEXAS 782011 rELEPHONE f8117586.8200
r
DATE: May 14, 1991 y
TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager G~
FROM: Gary A. Collins, Director of Information Services
SUBJECT: Data Processing Advisory Board Meeting
Unfortunately last night we did not have a quorum for the Data
Processing Advisory Board Meeting. Due to this fact no official
votes could be taken.
However 1 explained to the two members present that we had ~
requested proposals on the replacement of our word processing
equipment. After I reviewed the history of tike word processing
equipment and the growth of the Word Processing Center, I reviewed
the basic configuration and associated costs with the members
present. Mary Ramsey then discussed the capabilities of the two
lowest proposals and their associated support organizations. I
then explained how we could accomplish this goal with current
budgeted funding. Mary Ramsey then outlined the advantages of
going with Wang as the recommended vendor and explained the reasons
for proceeding at this time. The consensus of the members present
was that the City should proceed with this acquisition from Wang
Laboratories and enter into a five year lease purchase agreement.
Jim Kuykendall volunteered to be at the City Council work session
on May 21, 1991 to answer any questions the council might have.
I then explained that the purchase order for software for tha
operating system was necessary to continue operations and that this
software was proprietary in nature and therefore was a sole source
requisition. Additionally I explained that the other purchase
order was for the second year of the five year hardware maintenance
agreement we entored into with IBM last year and that maintenance
agreement locked In a 3 percent annual increase on maintenance
costs versus the typical 10 to 15 percent increases that are
industry standards. Both members present agreed that these
purchase orders were appropriate and should be executed.
1 i I
1
r
• ` .
VIM,
I will be happy to answer any further questions or provide any
additional information you might need.
a
Gary Collins '
Director of Information Services
.
NOTE: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED UNDER SEPARATE COVER,
i
d
4
J
i
I
{
s
~ i
, r.}1
i
DENTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Apri! 1, 1991 - March 31, 1992
EMEMBERSHIP
BOARD OF OIREOTOPS
Barbara Rueaeli
Ohalrman of the Board
s
Oharlgs W, Osrpenler
L Prealdent A Gen. Mqr, EXECUTIVE DIVISION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
j „
SUPPORT STAFF David Bites Carl Anderson Armal Membtaranlp Banquet
Admin,d Oper., Program Chairman Chairman-Elsot, Communfooli0n! COmndItoo
Assist, Into. Dlslrlb, Leadership Denton Public Relations Dlv, Public 11010110ndCaom11100 '
' Flelarl SusIrIM COmndllee
0. 0. Sexton Jerome Ooit
Chairman, Prooldants Vice Chairman, Govern- Bla POW10hi 0ownflloo
Olub 100 Staving Oomm mgnl Relations Div. Tronoporlollon Commlttod
Jo Ann Balfanfina George Qllkeson, Chair Ann Houston l adopt A•9olad Commltloo
Vice President Convention d VlNtora Vice Chairman, Com- Aprt-Buelnoso 00mm111e0 . I
Bureau Advisory Board munlly Day, Utvislon - Chrfetrnob Oommllloo
Kon Burdick UnlveralWr0ubinoae
' Robert Gentry, Chair Prl3Cllie Sanders A0110n CommlUoo
Vloe President Economic Development Vice Chairman, Member- pacers
Advlsory Board ship Development Div, $wool$
Bob Woodin liomberehip palaUtna
Nfw Mombar Coffooo
Treasurer, tntornal ' Budool a Ktrlondo Con+ml110e
Operalfons Division ' lone-Pentie PIInhIMO COmm.
i
i
1
1
Y\ r~~
1 1
_.I
owl
G R O U P R O S T E R
an==°=====umvzavxvx~=moo 05/20/91
Selected status code(s) ABCDLMNP]
in Group 1107)
d
Group [107] - 2Xeoutive Committee
sorted by Member name i
ID Representative
vvxv=aaaexooaccsesncncc.can=zxcv=.c=vsvnx aa=eeaxan¢oncsccenxaxvx=axasxav-acvcsva
1473A Houston, Ann R. A 827/565-0855
1613A Russell, Barbara A Barbara Russell Realtors 817/566-2730
1768A Sanders, Priscilla M Sears, Roebuck & Company 817/566-8835
1815A Cott, Jerome M. A Sundown Arabian Ranch 817/565-0313
1897A Pole, Frederick R. M University of North Texas 817/565-2103
19128 Anderson, Carl A Bill Utter Ford Company 817/382-5404
1952A Woodin, Robert B. A Woodin Financial services 817/382-1849 `
msaaa:manmarsmasaaaaeaaecxsssa,msvaaaaanamacasarasaaamaaassvsa:aasaramrrarr~mrrrmma; 1
Count: 7 II]
j
G R O U P R O S T E R
amabaaaasaraxa,yea:mamas 05/26/91
Selected status code(s) ABCDLMNP)
in Group 1108)
Group (108] 111 t ' bir'i to"r~ /
s6re by Member name
1
ID Representative
aroma mrrrarmamamacm¢armrma:srammaaaamaararrsaaaaaaaraxaraaasmaraaaasrmrmmsmmrarar
1030A Allen Wayne A Wayne Alien Construction Compa 817/387-0030
1051A Edmondson, Dianne A Apex Computer Placements Inc, 8171565-0658
1055E Hates, Russell L. A Ta Architectural Collective, 817/387-4881
1550A Biles, David W, A Law Office of David W, Biles 817/566-0566
1210A Coplen, Bob A 817/382-4989 f
1230A Boston, David L. A Dave Boston Homes Inc, 817/387-7752
1250A Baines, John E. A Denton Area Association of CPA 817/565-9015
1270A Robinson, Brian C, A Denton Community Hospital 817/898-7000
1282A Etheredge, Sherrie A Denton Depot Advertising Speoi 817/383-4006
1303C Ciulla, Don S. A Denton Regc1ional Modical Center 817/566-4000
1371E Briscoe, Colleen A First StaEa Bank 817/382-5421
13800 Rayner, Robert A Tom Fouts Realtors 817/382-1541
1427A Muller, Roland A Group Graphics 817/365-1255
1429A Willie, Melvin A GTE Southwest 817/383-2511
14470 Hayes, Richard D. A Hayes, Coffey 6 Berry, P.C, 817/387-3518
1462A Hoenig David A David Hoenig Electric, Inc. 817/387-7137
1565A Berg, Geneva A Locust St, Grill 817/566-3614
1686A Hili, Fred L. A People's Funeral Home 817/382-•6028
1718D King, Jeff A Ramey, King 6 11innis Insurance 817/382-9691
1760A Kin?, David L. A ShoNa$ s - Denton 817/382-8698
1870C Gen ry, Rob A United National Bank of Denton 817/382-6701
1927A Burgoon, Weldon A Weldon's Saddle Shop 817/382-1921
asmaaaxaxamaammmavaaavxavxvaaasmmareasau~svasasmvaeasav=xaaaavnaaasarsamzmanmxt=
Counts 22
f
r
S Y. 7
PGAfSt+
yti N lY b1Yd:~
1
i
G R O U P R 0 S T E R
05/20/91
Selected status code(s) ABCDLMNP}
in Group [105]
Group [105] - #i fidikiber
sor ed by Member name
ID Representative
==eCxoeCnxx3¢xx=xxcS=cSC=====v=acx=.===CxOxxxxxxa===xp==x====x==a==~-.~--~_-xaxac==
1119A Bly, Homer A 817/382-3070
1132A Brady CPA, William A 817/382-5866
1221A Croucn, Bob A. A Crouch Realty Company, Inc. 817/382-6707 ;
1251A Hall, Harry G. A Denton Area Teachers Credit Un 817/387-8585
1300A Appleton, Jr., Roy A Denton Record-Chronicle 817/387-3811
13000 Patterson, Fred A Denton Record-Chronicle 817/387-3811
1380D Fouts, Tom A Toro Fouts Realtors 817/382-1541
2091A Harpool, Jr., Tom C c~
1452A Heath, Millard A Millard Heath Air Conditiong C 817/383-1688
1533A Krause, Dave A Dave Krause Pontiac/Toyota/Dod 817/382-5481
1604A Miller, Jack D. A Jack D. Miller & Associates 817/387-4383
2092A Moeilinger, John C
2093A Monroe, J. Stanley C
1618D Hill Milton A Morrison Milling Company 817/387-6111
1618A Morrison, Jr., E.W. A Morrison Milling Company 817/387-6111
1642A Nelson, L.A. A 817/382-1561
2094A Orr, Jr., W.Q. C
2095A Ramey, Marvin C
1729A Reed Jr., Harold H. A 817/387-5655
1750A Martino, Frank A Russell-Newman Manufacturing C 817/382-2531
2096A Selby, R.L. C
1847A Bulls, Derrell W. M Texas Woman's University 817/898-2111
19120 Utter, Sr., Bill A Bill Utter Ford Company 817/382-5404
1960A Wyatt, A.E. A 817/387-5919
-_=====xaxxa=¢xaxxax===S=========a=x===xa=p=S=xaa==a¢==C==x~2mxx=pt9m=C=5aaa=x=aa=
Count: 24
i
.
}N VMS,.]
1
e
- e
PROGRAM OF ACTION
DENTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
April 1, 1991 - March 31, 1992
EXECUTIVE DIVISION
Barbara Russell
Chairman of the Board
Executive Committee
Barbara Russell, Chairman
Review and recommend proposed policy action for final
consideration by the Board of. Directors. Transact routine business 1
and act on internal policies, with all action ultimately
accountable to the full Board. I
Convention & Visitors Bureau Advisory Board I
George Gilkeson, Chairman
Review and make recommendations regarding the annual programs
and projects implemented by the Chamber's Convention & Visitors
Bureau. i
Economic Development Advisory Board 111
Robert W. Gentry, Chairman
Assist in the strategic planning and implementation of all 1
objectives of the Economic Development Partnership between the City
of Denton and Chamber.
Leadership Denton Steering Committee
David W. Biles, Chairman
i
oversee the programs, policies and funding for the chamber's
Leadership Denton program, which is designed to identify and train 1
individuals to assume top leadership positions at all levels of
local government and various community service organizations.
President's Club 100 Steering Committee
C.C. Sexton
oversee the programs and projects of the President's Club 100,
with the intent to attract new investing Chamber Members, as well
as provide funding for special needs of the overall organization
which cannot be provided through the regular General Operations
Budget.
Page 1
WWI
PUBLIC RELATIONS DIVISION
Carl Anderson
Chairman-Elect
Public Relations Committee
George Highfill, Chairman
Organize and serve as volunteer work force during regularly
scheduled general membership activities, including Quarterly
Membership Breakfasts, "Chamber Connection" Mixers, New Member
Coffees and the Annual Banquet. Serve as goodwill representatives
on behalf of Chamber at business openings and other special events.
Will work in cooperation with the Membership Relations Committee.
I
Communications committee
Bob Crouch, Chairman
Develop and coordinate effective communication with the
general membership, as well as the overall community. i)
Retail Businoss Committee
Ann Faye, Chairman
Identify and study areas of mutual concern for all local
merchants. Establish city-wide promotions to encourage increased
trade in Denton.
Annual Banquet Committee
Richard Hayes, Chairman
Oversee the plans and arrangements necessary to assure a
successful and entertaining Annual Membership Banquet, which
represents the symbolic transition of the Chamber's top voluntary
leadership and program year.
Page 2
II
1
h
r
y
1
w
1 ~
t' F
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Ann Houston
Vice Chairman of the Board
IlAdopt-A-eobool" committee
colleen Briscoe, Chairman
Continue partnership with the Denton Independent School
District to secure interest and participation in the "Adopt-A-
School" program. Explore the possibility of implementing an
additional program to help re-evaluate the present DISD curriculum
to provide a job-ready employee upon graduation. Promote
participation in Junior Achievement.
University/Business Action Committee
Pete Lane, Chairman
Promote joint utilization of resources between the Denton
business community and Texas Woman's University and the University
of North Texas.
Christmas Committee
Helga Williamson, Chairman t
oversee the various incal events associated with the Christmas 1
Season, with emphasis on a community-wide decorating contest and
possible festival of lights.
Agri-Business Committee
Stacy Burkholder, Chairman
Help promote the importance of the agriculture industry and
its economic impact on Denton County through the Annual Farm &
Ranch Tour, Youth Fair. Continue to pursue options for a local
Farmer's Market.
1
Page 3
i
F
1
GOVERNMENT RELATIONS DIVISION
Jerome M. Cott
Vice Chairman of the Board i
Government Relations Committee
Jerome M. Cott, Chairman
Monitor pertinent city, school and county government issues
and inform the membership of these issues that affect the Denton
business and professional community. Develop forums for open
communications between the Chamber and all local elected public
officials.
J
State Relations Committee
Dianne Edmondson, Chairman
Monitor pertinent state government issues and inform the
membership of those issues that affect the Denton Business and
professional community. Enhance relations between the Denton
chamber and other chambers across Texas that shara common
interests, specifically state-supported MH/MR and Higher Education
facilities. Evaluate and lay the initial ground work for the 1993
"Denton County Day in Austin" project. i
Transportation Committee
Rob Rayner, Chairman I
Identify important area transportation issues and needs;
determine appropriate forms of assistance to effectively address
these points. Specific emphasis to be placed on the extension of
F.M. 2499 between Denton and the Dallas/Fort Worth Airport, and 1
preservation of the present Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way, as
necessary to assure DART-sponsored light rail service to and from
the Dallas area in the future.
Page 4
k
i
MEMBERSHIP DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
Priscilla Sanders
vice chairman of the Board
Pacers Committee
i
Based on a pre-set, monthly quota, individual volunteers will
function as a year-round membership recruitment group, with
incentives offered in the form of annual bonuses awarded on a
percentage of actual new member income received.
f
sponsors committee
Linda Sheets, Chairman
Promote retention of new members through personal, pre-
assigned contacts to invite and accompany them to general
membership functions.
i
i
j
i
1
t~
t
t
f
Page 6
Ly
r INV]
(j S
/y
INTERNAL OPERATIONS OIVISION
Bob Woodin
Treasurer
Long-Range Manning Committee
Bob Coplen, Chairman
Insure that all aspects of the Chamberos internal and external
operations remain in Compliance with the U.s. Chamber of Commerce
Present guidelines, Continue to review Chamber's mission, f
present facility needs Reaccr office location options future programs and policies
and long-terra
Budget i Finance Committee
David King, Chairman
Develop and oversee the
funds, with emphasis on creating additional is
adequate reserves, revenue
Division Officers to serve on this committee.
i
i
i
I
3
i
Page 6
l
i '.]!Y. iV I
G R 0 U P R 0 S T E R
05/2D/91
Selected status code(s) [ABCDLMNP)
in Group [1111
Group fill) - Government Relations
sorted by Rep name i
ID Representative
1 055B Bates, Russell L. A The Architectural Collective, 817/387-4881
1550A Biles, David W. A Law Office of David W. Biles 817/566-0566
1847A Bulls, Derrell W. M Texas Woman's University 817/898-2111
1312A Chamberlain, Alan A Denton Trinity Roofing, Inc. 817/382-0664
1210A Coplen, Bob A 817/382-4989 i~
1815A Cott, Jerome M. A Sundown Arabian Ranch 817/565-0313
1214C Davenport, Cheryl A Cornwell-Jackson & Company, PA 817/382-2727
1397A Garrett, Elizabeth A Garrett Property Management 817/383-1198
1405A Gilkeson, George A 817/387-5373
1419A Gossett, Fred A Gossett Cons'.:ruction Company 817/566-2480
1838A Hyde, Waynard E. A Texas Waste Management 214/436-3512
1896A Jackson, Eric M University of North Texas 817/565-3000
1303D Jeane, Lynn A Denton Regional Medical Center 817/566-4000
2041A Jones, Guy A American National Insurance Co 817/566-0377
1780A king, David L. A Shoney's - Denton 817/382-8698
1835A Koster, Gary M Texas Instruments 817/381-2000
1016B Lackey, Gene A Acme Brick Company 817/387-5804
1750A Martino, Frank A Russell-Newman Manufacturing C 817/382-2531
1907A Newell, Charldean M University of North Texas 817/565-2000
1378A Powell, Jr., R.L. A The Fort Dallton Company 817/382-1390
1463C Richards, Tracy A Holiday Inn - Denton 817/387-3511
1613A Russell, Barbara A Barbara Russell Realtors 817/566-2730
1806A Stewart, Richard 0. A 817/382-3225
2098A Tipton, Cliff A Motivational Dynamics 387-4335
1301A Vento, Bob M Pathways - Denton Regional Med 817/566-4576
1923A Washington, Jr., Roo A 817/382-1350
2023A Waters, Dick A HBW Associates 817/566-0417
1018A Wilson, Kirk A Action Imports 817/387-3885
1224A Woolfolk, Rick A Crystal Ballroom 817/387-1887
Count: 29
Rr 1
DENTON CONVENTION 8 VISITORS BUREAU
Budget for 18 Months
April - September 1990 i
October - September 1991
Income
Projected 1990-1992
Total Income: $ 2399597
Disbursements
1989/90 1989/90 1990 1990/91
BUDGET ACTUAL 6 MNTHS BUDGET
Salaries 699156 69,156 35,669 759954 C.
Expense 1,600 11500 1,000 2,000
Taxes 8,395 55696 3,462 7,229
Insurance 3,180 4,209 2,678 5,355 ,
Training b Travel 3,324 3,000 21300 3,300
Equipment 8,855 7,000 5,837 9,946
Office Supplies 600 600 300 600
CVB Telephone 6,000 4,180 3,000 5,000
Audit
Pri 1,000 400 10000 11000
Printing 750 847 375 750
Postage 600 600 300 600
Convention Promotion: r1
Travel 4,700 11300 4,600 10,000
Services 31180 19200 11590 30180
Advertising 31000 -0- 19500 21000
Promotional Events 1,781 -0- 2,500 21000
Trade Shows 1,275 1,880 11150 750
Promotional Material 6,000 7,500 3,000 8,000
Memberships 1,357 19187 0- 1,357
Subscriptions - 100 78 50 100
Tourism Promotion:
Travel 300 250 250 500
Services 500 500 500 19000
Advertising 3,000 310bC 11500 31000
Promotional Events -0- -0- 500 19000
Trade Shows 1,350 11000 500 750
Promotional Material 10,000 7,500 5,400 11,200
Memberships 300 300 -0- 300
Subscriptions 10 12 -0- 15
Film Commission of North Texas 3,000 4,015 250 3,500
Total 143,313 126,910 79,211 1609386
1
r
I
1
4
33• W r
1
G ~ I lNfaal~
Proposed Annual Budget
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
October 10 1990 - September 30, 1991
ANTICIPATED INCOME:
- Private Pledges
- City of Denton $ 106,245
5__ 4, 200 ,
Total income $ T60,445
ANTICIPATED EXPENSES:
Salaries - I
Payroll Taxes - 80,945
Benefits - , 7,000
Auto Expense - 6,200
Selection Committee - 61000
Memberships/Professional Development - 5,000
I
Telephone - 1,000
M
Postage - 4,200
Office Supplies - 4,000
Travel/Marketing - 2,600
Factbooks & promotional Material - 80000
5,000 i
Prospect Proposals & Relocation Efforts -
t
100000
Site & Building Inventory Data -
1
r Capital Expense - 2,000
~ Small Business Center 120000
-
6,500
Total expenses 160,445
db
E
A
1
i
~ y
CLASS OF 1990-91
s
~YIJ
r
t
TABLE OF CONTENTS ~
Forward/Mission Statement 2
1990-91 Curriculum & Sessions 3
1990-91 Leadership Denton Graduates 4
Leadership Denton Alumni 9 C%
Leadership Denton Graduates 13
~ I
Sponsors 14
Steering Committe 15
t
F
Leadership Denton Logo designed by Russell Bates
s
l
i,y `xe~~ a,C+4
r t
t ~
!5
1990-91 LEADERSHIP DENTON
FORWARD STEERING COMMITTE
Although certainly not a new or unique concept, Leadership
Denton is one of the most successful and popular programs ever i
Russell Bates j
developed by the Denton Chamber of Commerce. By design, the
chamber is a non-partisan organization, but it ultimately recognizes General Chairman
the benefits of this program by helping to assure a continuous pool
of qualified and motivated individuals who are ready and willing David W. Biles Sherrie Etherdge
to pursue future leadership positions at all levels of government, Derrell W. Bulls Ricky L. Grunden
I as well as local community service organizations. Leadership Carolyn Scott Bray Eric Jackson
i Denton enjoys the active support of all local government entities, Jeanette Collier Peggy Norton
thus creating a dynamic and synergistic atmosphere between par- Bob Crouch • Fred Pole r
ticipants and key leaders of the community. Leadership Denton Dianne Edmondson *Charles W. Carpenter 4
operates as an independent affiliate of the Denton Chamber of j
Commerce, with its own separate steering committee and budget, *Ex-officio members
funded by a combination of participant tuitions and contributions
t from the local business community and interested individuals. Col-
lectively, participants represent a cross-section of business affilia-
tions, personal interests and civic ties. 1
For more information on this program call the Denton Chamber
of Commerce at 382.9693.
MISSION STATEMENT I
The purpose of Leadership Denton is to identify and motivate
emerging leaders, and develop their potential for community leader-
ship by exposing them to the realities, opportunities and issues of
the area.
U z is
.....uti-,.AMUA.t'iY'iYtMrM'Na...vwN.nr r ~
r
f
1990-91 LEADERSHIP DENTON SPONSORS 1990-91 LEADERSHIP DENTON
The Denton Chamber of Commerce and Leadership Denton Steering CURRICULUM & SESSIONS
Committee wish to thank the following businesses and individuals for their
financial and in-kind support during the 1990-91 Program Year. August 24 ICE BREAKER SOCIAL
Apex Computer Placements, Inc. September 6 INTRODUCTION
Russell Bates, Architect History of Denton
David W. Biles, Attorney Leadership Theory
Carolyn Scott Bray, Ph.D. Power & Authority
Derrell W. Bulls, Ph.D
Jesse A. Coffey Investments October 6 BUS TOUR OF LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE.
Crouch Realty
Denton Area Teachers Credit Union October 16 COUNTY GOVERNMENT
The Denton Depot Organization & Theory
Denton Publishing Co. -Sherifrs Department
'Denton Regional Medical Center -Probation Department
Denton Savings Association -Candidates' Debate
'GTE Southwest
Ivan N. Glasscock
Nrnember 15 SOCIAL SERVICES & ECONOMIC
Gene Gohlke Building Products DEVELOPMENT
Ricky Grunden, CFP SPONSOR: Denton Regional Medical Center
Ebby Halliday Realtors
Hayes, Coffey & Berry, PC December 13 CITY GOVERNMENT: ADMINISTRATION
David Hoenig Electric, Inc. City Manager & Department Heads
Ben E. Keith Co. Organization & Responsibilities
Gary Kirchoff, Attorney SPONSOR: OTE Southwest
'Leadership Denton Alumni Asscociation
Morrison Milling co. January 18 STATE GOVERNMENT
L. A. Nelson, Attorney
North Texas Savings & Loan Association State Boards {
Politics
William P. Phillips, Jr., Attorney SPONSOR: Sheraton Hotel at LINT I
President's Club 100
Professional Developement Institute February 19 CITY GOVERNMENT. LEGISLATIVE t
Hal Ray Tour City Hall i
Ramey, King & Minnis Insurance City Council Work Session
Harold H. Reed, DDS
Donna Robinson Photography March 26 EDUCATION
Barbara Russell DISD School Board Meeting
OShemion Hotel & Conference Center State Board of Education
Gerald Stone, Architect Higher Education
•Ttxas Instruments SPONSOR: Texas Instruments-Denton l
University of North Texas
United National Bank April 18 GROUP PROJECT PRESENTATIONS
Bill Utter Ford Co. SPONSOR: Leadership Denton Alumni Assn.
Weldon's Saddle Shop
14 'Corporate Session Sponsor 3
5
r
i
ti .
1990.91 LEADERSHIP DENTON GRADUATES LEADERSHIP DENTON GRADUATES It
Sandra Ables (88) Belly'%erbow (86)
JANE JENKINS RILES Jim Ablowich (88) James King (89)
Denton Main Street Manager Renee Aikman (87) Jeff king (86)
Denton, Texas Carl Anderson (86) Sandra Kristofferson (89)
Linda Ashmore (86) Sand
lF Graduated from Gen. Wm. Moultrie High School in hit. Michael Bates (89) Y Matthews iatZuey (87)
Pleasant, South Carolina Ann Lee (87)
Graduated, B.A. Communication Arts Education, Oral David Patricia BitBates) Diane Lynch s (
Roberts University Carolyn es Bray (8 y (8 John Matthews (86)
8)
Born in Portsmouth, Virginia, Jane has lived In Denton James McClanahan (84) for nearly two years. Stan Bryant (87) Don Merki (87)
Rusty Callaway (87) Mary Ann Merki (89)
Meta Carstarphen (68) Monte Miller (90)
Vicki Gifford Clayton (87) Steve Miller (87)
MARGARETT NELL BUTNER John Coble (89) Danny Mitchell (90)
General Manager Pat Coble (86) Rudy Moreno (88)
Auburn inn Jeanette Collier (87) Peggy
Stephany Compton (89) Richard Norton n (8
1 Denton, Texas Richard Norton (89)
Graduated from High School in Waxahachie, Texas BoSueb CopCook n ( Pam Rainey (90)
Born in Waxahachie, Margarett has lived in Denton for Albert D eBerry, Jr. Rob Rayner (86)
' 'nearly two years. (90) Hal Ray (86)
Bill Doranski (88) Brian Robinson (90)
Todd Duryea (89) Don Robinson (86)
Dianne Edmondson (88) Jean Ellen Rogers (89)
C
Sherrie haundra Edwards (90) Vicki Sargent (90)
YVETTE R. CLARK Carol E atns (90) (89) 7zrr Schatz (86)
Ingrid Scobte (87)
Assistant General Counsel Nelda Evarts (89) CC Sexton (99)
limas, ounsel
University of North C
Denton, Texas Shirley Fergerson (90) Kirk Simmons (87)
u~ Graduated from Thomas Jefferson High School in San Sara Susan ulna ck (86) Hank Spencer (40)
Antonio Fitzpatrick (88) Richard Stevens (90) i
Graduated, B LA., Yale University Rob Gentry (90) Carl Stocker (87)
Graducated, 1.D., University of Texas Law School Gina Gohlke (86) Michelle Story (86)
Born in San Antonio, Yvette has lived in Denton for Matthew Goh Mark Goohlk (c (87) Lynn Stucky (88)
nearly two years. Lida Svoboda 86
Stephen Grady (87) Alton Thibodeaux (88)
David Graham (87)
Marlene Gray (90) Brian Gary Truitt (86)
DAVID ROBERT COFFEY James Hardin (88 Walter
) William Watson,
on, III (89)
Agent Richard D. Hayes (86) Lloyd Webb (86)
Colonial Life and Accident Company David Hoenig (89) Michael Widmer (89)
a. Denton, Texas Rite Holcomb (90) Don Windle (81)
Graduated from High School in Sanger, Texas Joe Hopkins (87) Virginia Williams (89)
' Ann Houston (86) Jayne Withers (88)
Graduated, B.B.A. Marketing, University of North Texas 'Gary Hudson (90)
Born in Victoria, Texas, David has lived in Denton for Amanda Hulcher 89) Rick Douglas Wulk chef
(87)
five years. Eric Jackson (84) Mary ary Votes ( tees (87)
1
het s (87)
Tbm Judd (89)
4 13 I
LEADERSHIP DENTON ALUMNI 1990.91 LEADERSHIP DENTON GRADUATES
KAREN SUE FAUGHT
Ingrid Scuble-Class of 1987 Gary Truitt-Class of 1986 Director of Classified Personnel
2628 Jamestown Lane Administrator Denton Independent School District, Denton, Texas
Graduated from Denton High School
Denton, Texas 16201 Special Programs-Denton County 10' Graduated, A.A. Management, Mountain View College i
Denton, 1309 Graduated, B.B.A. Personnel Adm/Industrial Relations, 1
De, Texas 76202 U.N.T.
CC. Sexton-Class on 1989 Karen was born in Denton and has lived here twice for a
total of 14 years.
William Watson-Class of 1989 A
Special Assistant
Denton County Judge Moseley Field Unde,writer Financial Services
1035 W. Oak MONY ,
Denton, Texas 76201 P.O. Box 50774 BARBARA SUE FISCHER
Denton, Texas 76206 Director of Deaf Education ?
Denton Independent School Distrim
K Denton, Texas
Hank Spencer-Class of 1990 Virginia Wlllioms-Class of 1989 Graduated from Latta High School in Ada, Oklahoma
Doctor of Veterinary Medicine Broker-Realtor Graduated, B.S. Education and Masters-Learning F,duca-
Veterinary Medical Clinic Williams & Williams ton, East Central University
2561 Quail Ridge 2730 North Elm St. Born in Ada, Oklahoma, Barbara has lived in Denton
Denton, Texas 76201 Denton, Texas 76201 for four years.
G':
Jane Withers-Class of 1988 JOHN DAVID GAVIN
Dr. Ono Stucky-Class of 1988 Dental Hygenist Assistant Manager
Doctor of Veterinary Medicine John N. Withers, DDS k Palmas Del Mar i`
Westgate Veterinary Hospital 2141 Pembrooke
k 4501 N. Mesa Dr. d Benton, Texas 76205 Humacao, Puerto Rico
iE .
Denton, Texas 76201 . • ~ ~ Graduated from Christ School in Arden, North Carolina
Graduated, ILA, Economic/Business Management,
Rick Woolfolk-Class of 1987 North Carolina State University
Owner ]corn in Sanford, North Carolina, John has lived in
Lida Svobodo-Class of 1986 Crystal Ballroom Denton nearly three years. +
I
8430 Margarita Dr. 115 West College
Orlando, Florida 32817 Denton, Texas 76201 JUDY CATHLEEN HILDEBRAND t I
Conference Coordinator
Texas Woman's University
Denton, Texas
Graduated from Burges High School In El Paso
Graduated, B.S. Government, Texas Woman's University
,
12
11
I
,
" 1990-91 LEADERSHIP DENTION GRADUATES LEADERSHIP DENTON ALUMNI
TIMOTHY DUANE LAMP
General Manager James King-Class of 1989
Overhead Door Company Partner Pam Ralnry-Class of 1990
Denton, Texas Owner
Graduated from Southwood High School in Shreveport, Ramey, King & Minnis Insurance Co. Pam Rainey & Associates ,
707 First State Bank Bid.
Lovlsiana B Rt. 5 Box 171.8
Graduated, B.A. Business, University of North Texas Denton, Texas 76101 Denton, Texas 76201
Born in Fort Worth, Tim has lived in Denton for ten
years. Jeffre King-Clcs of 1956 ,
Bobby Hal Ray-Class rf 1986
Partner Controller King
& Min MARTY B. LEEWRIGHT 07 F st State BanknBIdgsurance Co. NO Texas Savings & Lora Assn.
, P. Box 69
Student Legal Advisor Denton, Texas 76201
University of North Texas Denton, Texas 16202
Denton, Texas
Graduated, A.A. North Iowa Area Community College Sandra Krlsloferson-Class of 1989 Rob Rayner-Class of 1986
t; Graduated, B.A. and Masters, University of North Texas 5 High View Circle Real Estate Agait
Graduated, J.D. Texas Tech School of Law Denton, Texas 76205 Tom Fouts Real Estate
Born In Fort Worth, Marty has lived in Denton for eight 700 Dallas Dr. 3
years. Denton, Texas 76205
James McClanahan-Class of 1989
f
I Professional Engineer
MARSHALL SCOTT LIPSCOMB Federal Emergency Management Brian Robinson-Class of 19W
Dentist Agency Administrator
Denton, T xas 800 N. Loop 288 RICA Denton Community Hospital
Cradua!:d from Bryan Adams High School in Dallas Benton, Texas 76201 201 N. Bonnie Brae
Graduated, &S. Biology, Baylor University Denton, 76w 76201 I
Graduated, D.D.S., Baylor College of Dentistry Mary Ann Merkl-Class of 1989
Born In Dallas. Texas, Scott has lived in Denton for two
Independent Computer Consultant Jean Elko Roger-Class of 1989
Rt. 2 Box 241 2157 Savannah
Aubrey, Texas 76227 Denton, Tbtas 76205 r~
CYNTHIA FAY MAGUIRE Monte Miller-Class of 1990 Vicki Sargeal-Ciase of 1990
Vice President Sales Manager Principal
Words Made Perfect, Denton, Texas Terrill Wheeler Printing, Inc. Hodge Elemenlery School
Graduated from High School In Edmond, Oklahoma 821 North Elm 2516 Mesquite
Graduated, 8S. Central State University Denton, Texas 76201 Denton, Texas 76201
Graduated, School of Medical Technology, St. Anthony
Hospital
f a Born In Cheyene, Wyoming, Cynthia has lived In Denton
for eight years.
I
6
",rwv"'wwawvypM~lyy„i~Mnc`-~w..--
I
1
1
r
-
LEADERSHIP DEN'I'ON ALUMNI 1990-91 LEADERSHIP DENTON GRADUATES r"
JESUS NAVA, JR. 1
Bill Doranskl-Class of 1988 Ricky Grunden 4VAssistant to the City Manager
Senior Account Agent Certified Financial Planner : j City of Denton, Denton, Texas
Bill Doranski Allstate Insurance 8440 Walnut Hill Lane, No. 530 Graduated from John F. Kennedy High School In San
411 W. University Dallas, Texas 75231 / Antonio
Graduated, B.A., University of Texas
Denton, Texas 76201
Graduated, Ai.P.A., University of Kansas
Born in San Antonio, Jesus has lived in Denton for one "
Dianne Edmondson-Class of 1988 Richard D. Hayes-Class of 1986 year.
President Attorney at Law t
Apex Computer Placement, Inc 601 First State Bank Bldg,
? PA. Box $0084 Denton, Texas 76201 a~ ANDRE JOSEPH RHEAUI.T I
Denton, Texas 76206 , Owner/Operator
Frenchy's Lawn Service, Denton, Tbrxm
Graduated from St. Louis High School in Biddeford,
Choundra Edwards-Class of 1990 David Hoenig-Class of 1989 r Maine
Certified Public Accountant President` Graduated from US. Air Force Leadership School
Hankins Powers Eastup, Denton & David Hoenig Electric Inc. g , 4 Graduated frown U.S. Air Force N.C.O. Academy
Tonn, CPA's 1201 Duncan Born in Biddeford, Maine, "Frenchy" has lived in Den- ?
3846 Waterford Way Denton, Texas 76201 ton for five years.
Denton, Texas 76205
Sherrie Etheredge-Class of 1989 Rita Holcomb-Class of 1990 NITA V. STARNES j #
Owner Educational Consultant Graduated from Denton High School
Denton Depot Advertising Specialties Holcomb Media Works G.aduated, B.S., Texas Woman's University
1511 Malone 2921 Croydon Lane , Born in Littlefield, Texas, Nita has lived in the Denton
Denton, Texas 76201 Denton, 'texas 76201 area for 22 years.
Carol Evans-Class of 1990 f
Owner Joe Hrpkins-Class of 1987
Appletree Real Estate P.O. Box 186
14 Highview Circle Denton, Texas 76202 t
Denton, Texas 76205 GEORGE EDWARD TERRY
Owner
Kiddie Korml
Rob Gentry-Class of 1990 Eric Jackson-Class of 1989 + k~ Denton, Teas
Chief Executive Officer Chief of Police fr Graduated from Denton High School
United National Bank University of North Texas Graduated, BS., University of North Texas
PA. Box 2226 PA. Box 1274; Born in Denton, Ed is a life-long resident of the city.
Denton, Texas 76202 Denton, Texas 76202
10 7 I
r
I
-4~
1990-91 LEADERSHIP DENTON GRADUATES
LEADERSHIP DENTON ALUMNI
ROBERT EDWARD VENTO The following individuals are paid members of Leadership Denton Alumni a
Administrative Director, Flow Campus A■sociation:
Denton Regional Medical Center
Denton, Tbcas Sandra Ables-Class of 1988 Carolyn e Director from Cleveland Central Catholic School Executive Director erector of 1988
Associate
Graduated Associate Nursing, Cooke County College Big Brothers and Sisters Career Planning 310 li Dallas Dr. UnIversity of N rt Placement
Graduated, B.B.A., University of North Texas P.O. Box of North Tens
Born in Cleveland, Ohio, Bob has lived in Denton for 14 DoiB
Denton, Tbws 76205 ox 13378 '
years. Denton, Texas 76203
Carl Anderson-Class of 19M
1990-91 CLASS ADVISORS General Sales ManWr j6h" Coble-Class of 1988
Bill Utter Ford Doctor of Optometry
P.O. Drawer U Ragsdale Vision Center
Denton, Texas 76202 326 N. Locust Street
Denton, Texas 76201 1
RUSSELL BATES Michael Bales--Class of 1989
Intern/Archhert Patricia Coble-Class of 1916 a
General Chairman The Architectural Collwive
Leadership Denton Steering Committee P.O. Box 1983 Assistant lhrxlor :
Denton, Rrxa.s 76202 North Thu Education A Training Co-op
P.O. Box 1694
Pat Bales-Class o41990 Denton, :hus 16202
Certified Public Account
Charles V. Brown, CPA Jeaaretle Collier-Class of 1987
Rt. 2 Box 638 CC 1300 Dallas Dr., No. 222 {
Denton, Texas 76201 Denton, 'texas 76205 ' t
DAVID BILES
Class Advisor Russell Bales
Architect
Bob CoNn_Cl. pf 1990
The Architectural Collective 2237 ill to.
P.O. Box 1983 Denton, , Tb 7b
Daas 76503
Denton, 'fleas 76202 i
Al DoNtrty-Class of 1990 '
Dold Riles-Class of 1989 General Manager s
Attorney at Law Excel Ian of Austin-South
P:o. Box 909 2711 11" 33 South F
PEGGY NORTON Denton, Tirxas 76202
Austin, Texas 78741
Clru Advisor
a.... , w~ 9
1
1
1
R
r,
r g
q
i f'5. /q
May 21, 1991
Y
1
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
TOr MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
RE: PILOT CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of April
29, 1991, reviewed the pilot curbside recycling
program. No action was taken pending the outcome of
the Council decision regarding commercial solid waste &
and further review during the budget review process.
SUMMARY/WkCKGROUND ;
PILOT CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM
The residential division began curbside collection of tin,
aluminum, glass, newspaper, and plastic on November 7, 1990,
In an area consisting of 904 households located in north
Denton, west of Sherman Drive.
The frequency of collection was once per week until January
when the collection frequency was changed to once every two
weeks. The program began with 235 participants and has
grown to 323 by the and of March. Selected operating
1 results are as follows:
Once Per Week Collection with Two Person Crew
i i
Avg. No. of Homes Per Hour - 33.5
Avg. Set-out Rate - 105.8 or 351 of participants f
Avg. Volume per Set-out - .23 cubic yards
Once Every Two Week Collection with Two Person Crew
Avg. No. of Homes Per Hour - 25.5
Avg. Set-out Rate - 177.3 or 601 of participants
Avg. Volume per Set-out - .23 cubic yards
Through April 1991, 535 cubic yards (bulk of material at
curbside) of recyclables have been collected.
pgP5 ~
r
Page 2
SURVEY OF PARTICIPANTS
Surveys were mailed to participants in the City of Denton's
Pilot Curbside Recycling Program in an attempt to assess
satisfaction with the program as it is currently being
provided, and to gain insight into possible improvements
that might be made. The survey was conducted merely to
obtain citizen input regarding this program and the results
are analyzed solely for this purpose. The response to the
survey was overwhelming. Of 278 surveys mailed to j
participants, 210 were returned on a first mailing for a
response rate of 75.6%.
6
k
Survey respondents were asked to rate their satisfaction '
with the program. The choices ranged from very satisfied to
very dissatisfied. The results were as follows: ;
Respondents Percentage
Very Satisfied 130 s
61.9 %
Somewhat Satisfied 56 26,7 %
Neutral 12 5.7 %
Somewhat Dissatisfied 5 2,4 %
Very Dissatisfied 5 2.4 8
No Opinion/No Answer 2 .95%
Of 210 respondents, 20 reported having experienced some type
of problem (9.5%). Of the 20 who reported difficulties, 13
reported having had their problems resolved (65%). Of those
who felt their problems had not been addressed, all
expressed confusion as to pickup schedule.
The respondents were asked what frequency of service they
preferred. The respondents overwhelmingly preferred
continuing the one time every two week schedule currently in
place.
Respondents Percentage
One Time Per Week 22 10 6
One Time Every 2 Weeks 135 64.3 %
One Time Every 3 Months 21 10 %
One Time per Month 30 1.43%
No Answer 2 .95%
i
1
1
r
i
Page-3------------------------------------------------------
The type of container preferred by the majority of the
respondents was the stackable containers. Those had the
single tub expressed dissatisfaction with the size of the
container. Other comments related to throwing the stackable
containers about the yard once they were empty. Other
complaints related to how hard the stackable containers were
to store and that, for older persons, how difficult they are
to carry. The majority of respondents expressed a
preference for stackable containers as follows:
Respondents Percentage
Single Tub 37 17.6 1
Nesting 71 34.8 1 ;
Stackable 101 48.1 1
No Answer/No Preference 1 .481 }
Seventy percent (142 respondents) expressed being very to
somewhat satis:led with their containers.
When asked if they preferred to use plastic bags, 149
respondents answered no (711), 51 responded yes (24.3!) and
ten answered no preference/no answer (4.81).
One hundred eleven (111) of 210 respondents indicated a
willingness to pay a fee for recycling (52.91). Ninety-four
(94) of the respondents were unwilling to pay for the
service (44.81). Five (5) respondents had no opinion or
provided no answer (2.41). Those who indicated they were
not willing to pay fees suggested using residential ratea
based on demands.
Respondents requested recycling cardboard, other paper,
motor oil, and other glass and plastics.
One hundred eighty (180) of the respondents stated their
containers were one-half full to overflowing. The
respondents also reported that of those who had full to
overflowing containers, 561 reported fewer than two bags of
regular trash.
s
Seventy-one of the respondents were older than age 55 (341), i
and 62 were 26-35 (29.51) representing most of the
participants in the program.
i
r
n
Page 4
CITY-WIDE RECYCLING 1
A supplemental decision package for city-wide curbside j
recycling has been included with the residential solid waste
budget for FY 1992.
Two options were evaluated for city-wide curbside
collection. The first involved use of truck and trailer as
we are current'.y doing in the pilot program. This option
would require hiring four employees with less expensive
equipment. The option included in the budget requires
hiring two employees and purchase of sore expensive vehicles
and is less costly than the truck and trailer method.
The program assumes up to 6000 participants and would
require hiring two drivers and purchase of two fully
integrated recycling vehicles along with other necessary
equipment. The program will cost approximately $208,973 per
year with revenues of $26,929 from sale c` material. If all
residential customers paid for the program whether they
participate of not, the cost would be $1.20 per month or
$1.05 per month if sale of material is used to subsidize the
program.
It. is estimated that the volume collected from the curb
would be 21,528 cubic yards. Because of compaction of
plastic and breakage of glass, this would translate into
approximately 12,171 cubic yards to be hauled to market and
it is estimated that 7,520 cubic yards of space would be
saved at the landfill (approximately one week of life
expectancy saved per year), and rep::esents approximately a
9.49 reduction in residential waste.
It is estimated that 6000 of our residential customers will
participate in the program with an average set-out rate of
60% for once every two week collection. The program will
cost $2.23 per set-out with a landfill avoided cost of $ .28
per set-out and a value of $ .29 per set-out for material
sales.
i
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED
Residential solid waste customers , Solid Waste
Department of Utilities, City of Denton, Public
Utilities Board, City Council.
Page 5
FISCAL IMPACT
Cost of pilot Curbside Program ; 17,272
Cost of City-wide Program $208,973
Respec ully submi d,
oy V. Harrel
City Manager
Pre aced by-
,/D1
Community SetviW_
Approved by;
.E. Nelson, Executive Director
Department of Utilities
Exhibit I Graphs 6 Charts
II Monthly Recycling Data
III Supplemental Package
IV Minutes PUB Meeting of 4/29/91
PUEILTC UTILITIEEXCERPT
BOARD MEETING
APRIL 291 1991
9. RECEIVE REPORT ON CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM.
Angelo introduced this item stating
started in July public acc
program
1990, The object ept
ftthetesestt program
warast ic to iipadtioentnify the lvol ume evel an of
p, the
manpower requirements, equipmentprequirementsbies,
~ schedulin
and ICUd fill space erequiredntalner naeds, suitability,
escalat to over The P roeram began with 260 participants which has
people on that route participants (or 438 of the L
United States get a 308 Most voluntary programs i
participation rate, n the
One determination that was made was
a number of households set out the "set out rate'~j
but then held material and set Itiout°fly at first,
two *.teeks, The "set out" rate continuedtoodecrease
and in January, the city went to a once every
pickup. two week
Overall this bears out that with a once a
358 of the participants will set out fo weak pickup,
a once every two week picku r t 651 tionp on
participation p~ You will
get 658
Angelo then showed co
pounds collected mparisons of types of collection,
Collection, fie o revenue generated and coats of
Denton has s advised that all categories show a loss,
The markets aret very more
bad. money coller,+,ing than selling,
y
A questionnaire was sent out with 758 responding, They
indicated:
a) 52,98 would be willing to
were not willing to pat a fee, while 44,88
respondents had no opinions this service five
Frady stated he could see where the city would
gain from such a program, but how would the
individual gain?
Angelo stated by landfill space saved and impact
on environment, Frady asked if collecting every
two weeks would cut down on the number of
employees. Angelo stated this would have no impact
on the number of employees.
r
Chew asked If expanding this to a city-wide program
would cause an increase of two additional personnel;
Angelo said yes, two additional people and two
recyclable container trucks.
Laney stated he talked a friend into signing up to
judge the service. His complaint was not service, but
he said he simply does not accumulate enough; it
apparently takes two weeks for a family to justify
taking their recyclables out to the curb. Chew stated
if staff is not contemplating including the entire city
In the program, what areas are being contemplated?
Angelo stated the budget supplemental package Is for
city-wide implementation, but that only a continuation
of the existing pilot program in the North Central part
of the city is included in the budget.
Angelo advised that the survey they did also inquired
as to container preferences the city provided three i'
types of containers. Stackable containers look like the
way to go. The response was not favorable on the clear
plastic bags used the first eight weeks. 75% did not
prefer plastic bags. 69.98 were very satisfied with
stac,kables, 26.78 somewhat satisfied and 2.48 somewhat
dissatisfied.
Angelo stated the supplemental budget package includes I
a once a week collection and a two person crew, to
expand city-wide for a total request of $208,000. This ,
translates into a rate increase of $1.20 per
household. If the utility takes the money from selling
recyclables (approximately $26,929) the rate increase
would be $1.05 per month charged to all ^ustomers.
He stated the utility would divert 9.48 of waste from
the landfill with this program. Howeverr the avoided
cost (landfill cost ($.28/pickup) + sale of materials
ravenue (.29 cts/pickup) would not offset the
$2.23/participating customer cost which indicates this
will not be a profitable operation and staff is not
recomntendina imi~lementation at this time.
Angelo adviskid there are 14 locations across the city
for people to bring recyclables. Due to the substantial
decisionmakitlg that must take place regarding the solid
waste system, setting a recycling program in place at
this time would not be feasible.
Angelo also stated that some of the state legislation
proposed for recycling carries financial assistance,
and Denton may be able to get grant money to expand the
program. Nelson noted that the $1-$1.20 increase would
be across the board, and is predicated on a 30t
F
ti
F?
i]
service, Participationhiraghtee,r the rate haspto goat use the
Thompson commented that the utility must continue to /
iook at the program, fio recognized Joyce Poole and
Mike Cockran and expressed appreciation for their
attendance and than film they brought, and advised the
Hoard would look at it next meeting. Thompson stated
the staff and board need to continue to look at
different options and costs. Chew expressed
appreciation to Joyce Pool and Mike Cockran for their
work over the past few weeks,
{
s!
1
CURBS'oe RECYCLING SU
PApTfC1AAT10M MARY `
400
1
300 n^
LLJ i .ti F <
A" I
I Ix
CL7 200
X 63% n 'bBX.
i 52%
100
34%
0
NOVEMBER OeCEMBER JANUARY FEEAUARY
MARCH APRIL
MONTH
# PARTICIpAT1N(3 , ru"
# SIGNEC) Up
k
r
CURBSIDE RECYCLING SUMMARY
YARDg COLLECTED
60
50
40
LIJ
J
30
ml
20
Mi
r(I( I 'u
10
ti K :4 '.Y
r:
0 y
NOVEMII M DEC ix
AMBER jANUAAY FEgRUAAY
MONTH MARCH APRIL
TIN ALUMINUM
PLASTIC
GLASS "".NEWSPAPER
1
w
-419
e
q
{
{
p
CURBSIDE RECYCLING SUMMARY
TOTAL POUNDS COLLECTED
25,000
i
i
20,000
15.000
p '
Z
D
O ~I
10,000
R
5,000
0
NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH AP14IL
MONTH
1pr lip
}
CURBSIDE RECYCLING SURVEY
Total Pounds Collected
r' Glass
$ 7.214
/ 19.67%
i
Plastic
t,eee
1,9% _ Aluminum
3W.2.9
77-33% Tin (,41%)
bus
(,s9%`
i
Newspaper
87,882,2$
i
n
i
CURBSIDE RECYCLING SURVEY
Total Yards Collected
Plastic ,
208,5 `
,w
39,01% I
Aluminum
23,75
4.44%
nn
5,1491 27,5
r
13.41 %
Glass
71,725
38%
i
Newspaper
203,29
t 1
4
V
A r.
,URBSIDE RECYCLING SURVEY
Satisfaction level
Very Satisfied
N 130
~f
81.9%
No Ophilon/NA
02,
l
2.4% Ve 0
j
2.4 05
Somewhat Dtssatis
5,79b #
Neutral
28,70% #12
%
Somewhat Satisfied
#se
t
M ff `
[1
CURBSIDE RECYCLING SURVEY
Frequency of Service
# 1 /Two Weeks ,
# M \
/ # 1IW"k
M 22
84.396 /
10%
/ No Answer
5 #2
1,43%
#I/Month
* 30
1016
#I/Three Weeks
MV
P
i
i
.a
`a
i
CURBSIDE RECYCLING SURVEY
Container Preference
Nesting
# 71
Single Tub
a 37
34.8% %
17, 69'°
NA/NP
#1
I (,48%)
48.1%
/
`Stackable
# 101
T _ I 11
OMMOM
f,
i~
CURBSIDE RECYCLING SURVEY
Willingness to Pay for Program
Willing,
#
c'>
52.9°0
No Opln1un/NA
- 2,496 # b
i
44.8% r'
Unwffffng
# 04
r---~ -
wow
1
:,.,,MARY OF RECYCLAELES FOR NOVEMBER
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL
CONTAINER YARDS POUN~wb COLLECTION GAIN
MATERIALS FILLED COLLECTED COLI.ECTEO REVENUE COST (LOSS)
TIN 3.750 3,750 82.500 1.660 25.14 ($23.49)
y
ALUMINUM 6.500 6.500 97,500 42.900 43.68 ($0.68)
PLASTIC 16,000 30,000 240.000 4.800 100.56 ($96.76)
CLEAR GLASS 61000 12.000 21880.000 43,200 40.22 $2.98
GREEN GLASS 0.750 0.750 180.000 2.700 5.03 02.33)
BROWN GLASS 01876 0.875 210,000 31150 5.67 ($2.72)
NEWSPAPER 15.000 45.000 14,985.000 74.925 100.56 ($26.63)
MONTHLY TOT 47.476 98.875 18,676.00 $17:,33 $320.95 ($147,63)
SUMMARY OF RECYCLABLES FOR DECEMS£R
i
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL
CONTAINER YARDS POUNDS COLLECTION GAIN I
MATERIALS FILLED COLLECTED COLLECTED REVENUE COST (LOSS)
TIN 3.000 3.000 66.000 1,320 24.63 ($23.21)
ALUMINUM 3.000 3.000 46.000 t4.800 24.63 (1403)
PLASTIC 16,000 32.000 266.000 5.120 130.83 (1126.71)
CLEAR GLASS 4.600 9.000 2,160.000 32,400 36.80 (44.40)
GREEN GLASS 1.750 1.760 420.000 8.300 14.31 ('18.01)
BROWN GLASS 1.760 11760 420.000 6.300 14.31 ;$a.01)
NEWSPAPER 9.260 27.750 9,240.160 46.204 76.64 (124.43)
MONTHLY TOT 39.260 78.250 1240T.750 111.444 $320.96 ($203.81)
k
ARY OF RECYCLABLES FOR JANUARY
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL
CONTAINER YARDS POUNDS
MATERIALS FILLED COLLECTED COLLECTED REVENUE COLLECTION GAIN
DST (LOSS)
TIH
9.500 6.000 132,000 2.640 79.28
(176.64)
ALUMINUM 51000 3.250 48.750 21,450
41,72 ($20.27)
PLASTIC 25.600 35.000 280.000
5.800 212.79 (!207,19)
CLEAR GLASS 7,000 11.000 2,640.000 39.600
58.41 (!18.81)
GREEN GLASS 2.250 11500 360.000 5.400 18,18
(113.98}
BROWN GLASS 2.250 1.500 360.000 5.400
18.78 {113.38)
NEWSPAPER_-_---- 16,750___35.250-_-11,738.250 58.691 139.77 (181.08)
-
MONTHLY TOT 68.250 93.500 150569,000 138.781 $669.63 ($430,75)
~J
SUMMARY OF RECYCLABLES F FEBRUARY
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL
CONTAINER YARDS POUNDS
MATERIALS FILLED COLLECTED COLLECTED REVENUE COSTECTION GAIN
(LOSS)
TIN 5.260 5.260 115.600 2.310 48.11 ($46.80)
ALUMINUM 4.750 4.760 71.250 31.360 43,63
($12.1x)
PLASTIC 24.000 48.000 384.000 71880 219.53 ($212,25)
CLEAR GLASS
4,600 9.000 2080.000 32.400 41.24 ($844)
GREEN GLASS 11250 1.250 300.000 41600 11.46 (46.95)
BROWN Q1./.SS 11250 1,250 300.000 4,600 11,46 ($6.96)
NEWSPAPER 14,600 43.500 14,486.600 72.428 132. P,7 (440144)
MONTHLY TOT~~ -
66.600 113.000 110816.250 156.188 $508.58 ($383,41)
t
7
rt
j>
Si
`l
MARY OF RECYCLABLES FOR MARCH
TOTAL TOTAL
MATERIALS CONTAINER YARDS TOTAL
FILLED COLLECTED POUNDS
TiN ______`COLLECTED REVENUE COLLECTION GAIN
4.250 4.250 COST (LOSS) ALUMINUM 93,500 1_,870
PLASTIC 2.750 2,150 41' 250 18,150 55.47
12,250 24,500 35.89 ($1T.T4)
CLEAR GLASS 196,000 3,920
3,750 7,500 1,800,000 169.89 (!156.97)
GREEN CLASS ,800.000 2T, 000
0,626 0,625 48'95 (521, 9p)
BROWN GLASS 150,000 2-2s0 8.16 (65,91)
NEWSPAPER 210.000 3.160 R
61.000 18.000 11,42 (68,27)
MONTHLYTOT 51994,000 29.970
•500 $8,500 78.31 448,34)
8 t484, 750 86.310
.
$398,10
0 $398,10 (1311,19) i
5,AARY OF RECYCLABLES FOR
APRIL
rTOTAL TOTAL
' MATERIALS CONTAINER YARDS TOTAL
4 _ FILLED COLLECTED ANDS
COLLECTED COLLECTION
TIN REVENUE COST CAIN
5.260 5.250 115.b00 (LOS5)
ALUMINUM
2.310
" 3.400 3.500 70.88
(468.57)
PLASTIC 62.500 23.100
19.500 39,000 47.26 (524.10) e
CLEAR GLASS 312.000 6.240 263.29
4.780 9.600 2,260.000 !6207,00)
OREEN GLASS 34.200
0.800 0,800 84.13 ($29.03)
BROWN GLASS 192.000 2.880
0.800 O.E00 10.80 (67.92)
NEWSPAPER 192.000 2.800
11.260 33.760 11,238.760 10.80 (67.02)
MONTHLY TOT 66. 19.4
46.850 92.000 - 161,90 (606.70)
127.804 6019.08
.._.~.~*019 -(6401.26)
k
r
t
rr..
~ ~ 1e
`u
t
IARY OF RECYCLASLES - YEAR TO DATE
TOTAL TOTAL
MATERIALS CONTAINER YARDS TOTAL
_ "---FILLED COLLECTED POUNDS
TIN COLLECTED COLLECTION GAIN
REVENUE
C
31.000 21, 500-----_~-----~ST
(LOSS)
ALUMINUM 805.000 12,100
25.500 23,150 295,42 (1283.32)
PLASTIC 356,250 158,75Q
CLEAR GlAS3 112.250 208.500 1,868.000 243.01 (!86.26)
30.500 33.340 58.000 13, 920 .000 1,069,71 ($1,038,35)
GREEN GLASS 7.425 6,675 208.800
(lSt.86)
BROWN GLASS 1.802.OOp
7.800 24,030 29070,.86
7,050 1,692.000 25.380 (!46,13)
NEWSPAPER 76
12.750 203.250 74.33 (!48,95)
67,682 °50
YEAR TO OATS 338,411 e
287.225 534.725 693,29 {!354.87)
87,525,500
12, 737 i7 t1,93_ 34
11
1
I
I
I
,
- cJ
Cop' MU112TY SERVICES
FISCAL SOLID WASTE/0801 PAGE 1
'IEAR i
1991 - 1942
SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING REQUEST FORM
8F-41
PROGRAM TITLE - CURBSIDE RECYCLING
PROGRAM PERSONNEL RE DETAIL.,
14Uh18ER OF POS, PROPOSED POSITION TITLE
BEdIN DATE ANNUAL
2 !M-D-`TE_ HOURS
RESIDENTIAL DRIVER
PROGRAM bETAIL: 208Q
ACCCUNT NUMBER
ACCOUNT TITLE
8021 Service Maintenance mRFOUn ED
8041 civilian Overtime Salary $ 33,258
8051
8062 Civilian Longevity
F, I. C. A. 2.172
aosz a
8064 imS 2,570
8065 workers Compensation 1,798
Ftealth & Lite Insurance 50156 1
Sub-Total Personnel 456
8101 Office Supplies t 45,400
8104 (flyers & bill Stuffars)
8108 Gas/Oil/Diesel S 2,Qoo
8109 Uniforms 2,752
8116 Postage 610,
Other Supplies 5,220
8121 (5 tarps es196/sa)
Protective clothing 960
Sub-Total Supplies 5o
8342 Vehicle Maintsnance x 11,5
8343 Machine & Equi 6 3,000
Sub-TotaZMQMaintenancesnae 500
8502 a It
o
8504 Special services
8507 Advertising s 50,640
Motorpool Lsase (3 yr financin 3,000
2-Integrated Recycling Trucks gl 86 896
9654001each
6000 Sets Recycle Bins 0$16.25/set
5-30 YD Open Tops 0$3,000/each
Sub-Total Equipgent
$ 40,
1
f -
ti
k
ij
i
:RGGRAiM TITLE - CUnSIDE RECICLi;lG
PAGE 2
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT
._TLE AMOUNT REQUESTED
88C3 Fire Ext Coverage
3810 General & Auto Liability g 840
sub-Total Insurance 4.095
3 4° S
9110 Radios
Sub-Total Radios S 3.000
$ - 31000
TOTAL PROGRAM FUNDING REQUIREMENT
$208,913
BRIEF PROGRAM DESCRIPTIQN'.
C'
Citywide program for Curbside recycling using integrated trucks for
collection of newspaper, glass, plastic till, &
15,000 residential customers. Provide each aluminum to serve
stackable container'. w
participant with three
ch would collected week or,
designated households, h=collectedberecyclable ematerialsr will Ltj
hauled to the Service Center and transferred to 30 cubic yard open
top containers. These containers will be hauled to market by a
roll-off truck, as is presently being done with ' recyc;lables
generated by the pilot recycling program. This ror
squire a rate increase of $1.20 for all residential customers ,will ~
MAJOR SHORT-TERM PROGRAM GOA02
1• To respond to Community desire to recycle.
2. To increase public awareness of the need to conserve
resources,
SPECIFIC AND MEAS LE PROGRAM OBJECTIVESs
PRODUCTIVITY ABOVE BASELINE
I CREA-5~.,, F ,ABOVE BA.SZLrX
1. To roduce residential waste stream by 9.4%
2• To achieve set out rate of 60% or more.
1481 TONS RECYCLED
1481 TONS
SPECIFIC PRO(gg PRODUCxTVITy M &A.t M 3
P ODUCTIVi ABOVE 8 S INE I C SE ABOVE BASELINE
1. To reduce residential waste stream by 9,41
2. To achieve set out rate of 601 or more.
1481 TONS RECYCLED 1481 TONS
..w
1R
75
PROGRAM TITLE CURBSIDE RECYCLING PAGE J
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
A. EXPENDITURE REDUCTION:
Will this program result in direct cast savings? NO
s. REVENUE ENHANCEMENT:
Will this program directly result in increased revenues? YES
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT TITLE AMOUNT
6707 sale of Scrap Material $26e929
C. NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES:
Will tangible expenses rise/revenues decline if this program
is not funded? No
D. WILL THIS PROGRAM OBLIGATE THE CITY TO PROVIDE FUNDING IN t
FUTURE YEARS7 YES
ARE ANY PROGRAM COSTS RELATED TO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SUCH 1
AS NEW FACILITIES? NO
F. ARE ANY PROGRAM COSTS RELATED TO GRANTS SUCH AS MATCHING
FUNDS OR SERVICES? NO
i
i
i
i
i
h
1
f
x~
f
1ti~Eic OF
sItTF
FR cn y .A79IAL
SET C; 01.. E.
f'*LC
mr ,T 1
Et+(V aRT C ~OLLcC::'.'~ .,x_11 r ,SEC
:CY ' T rr` mT}rp OURS J.,iC r..h
D PER HOUR
.6 J 1 X WK - AGS
84
X It`K 249 SAGS
96 1 X WK 42
ib I X It7C 'G9 BAGS :.5 9.f 58
._15/90 33 1 X 1t`K ;h9 BAGS 2.5 d6
°p
100 g' t WK BAGS 3.3*
. S s.
25
75
1 RAGS " c 25
n ici 90 p q 1 X 3x ;70 -1 BAGS
0 RAC` ?.5
3
91 W3 1 X 2 wKs 278 CONTAINERS 0 66.5 1
:/30/91 166 1 \ 1tKS 9_ X :7S CONTAINERS 6,'S 10 „S 9
:113:9i :04 1 S' C0MTIFPS 4,2S 25
' -1 1 yNS 66.75
307 CONTAINERS a6, 25
,
^1 IF Y K 24
S ✓16 CONTAINTT)S 2 t)
CONTAINERS :S 5 33
ONCE ^t?. k1EF.k COLLECTICN iYITFi r40 PERSON CREIt':
I! 1, 1, , III
average rear er of omes - 33,5/hour
average set out rate ,
Average volume of material per set out _OS.S er 35§ of participants
3 cubic yards
. Eb,M r111 WEEK COLLECT".Q~1 V TTH rl'O PERSON MEW:
verage n er or omes - 25.5/hour I
Average set ouc :nte 177,3 or 591 of participants
Average vo!tro o: material per set out - 23 cubic yarns
As of March 2', :991, there are 323 participants out of ,i ross'ble 904,
fie participation rate on November 7, 19900 was 25,931
r
1,'51nc r.bove information, the following is offered for citywide recycl;,ble collection
ca«:I? per two weeks.:
150000 Customers
40t Participation
7M Citywide Participants
x 601 Set Out Rate
-'Tiblf Set Outs per Collection
5,600 Set Outs 141 Hours
III
• omes/ ,'ear amours 1,76 Crews Needed
CONCLUSION:
"wo,,"nao-person crews needed to provide service using truck and trailer nx
~tr.pr:orrt. III difference between 1.76 and 2 craws is a continvencv for
7cmwt,h in participation,
`E sded from analysis because additional personnel were used to goat the task acccmplished
end because quantities rat representative of norm.
t
:i
t•IATPY?AIf NO. SET AVG. PER AYO. PER EST, YD3 EST. LBS
OIJ'i ;/Yn 9ET OUT/YD3 SOFT OUT/LBS to to N(), LOA68 PsyrnUK HAUL 0067
COLLECT COLLECT $120 es.,
'I III (11001) o l 16 a ,
1086 23 1100 36 $ 468 1+ 20
rli,rilllprrll _,r;rifr~' n0$~} 133f f 833 1;
28 5,631, 3,360
.
51
,n109,.,I1 (W16 1023 (i'i 9 5u '
1,319 6,120
A!; 1 ~1~Ou 11'S I 1 = -
1732 11.16,5p 0 58 61248
6196o
Q;? 3
h
215 52,011'f 780
I I Illl 1 ~1 {(,1111 . Il!)i,.I , ( ~ 1;
215 52,04` 7 780
84o
u l<u"I n l l: l; q, 1,1 n 11 f 5 5 7o
i
r,,
6'f 2,340,000
r 235 1~,f0C' PO ,2no
- -
_ 2~i+9 9q SO,b 11
i
I ")[WA OP 1011
i
( t
I )
1
+
~ r
ff
~s
iK
i ~
R-
1
C/rY o/ o&NTON, rEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76207
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 17, 1991
TO: Lloyd v. Harrell, City Manager
f
THROUGH:
Join F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance
FROM: d ~
Mark L. McDaaicl, Budget Analyst
SUBJECT: RESULTS-
1991-92 CITY COUNCIL BUDGIrr PRIORTI'1Fs I
~ QTJES'ITt7NNA112E
3
I Please find attached updated survey results of the 1991-,92 City Council Budget Priorities
Questionnaire, which includes responses
Council members). These results are scheduled for discussion with the Council exiting
I at the
May 21, 1991 Council worksession.
i
If you have any questions regarding these results, Please advise.
80/566.8200 D/FW METRO 4342529
f w
140
F
4
,eF
REUL 05/17/91
CITY COUNCIL BUDGET PRIORITIES QUESTIONNAIRE
1991-92 BUDGET
RATING VAIL_U_E
No _
ELIMINATE CURRENT EFFORT I
SUBSTATIALLY REDUCE CURRENT EFFORT 1
REDUCE CURRENT EFFORT 2
CONTINUE CURRENT EFFORT 3
INCREASE CURRENT EFFORT 4
SUBSTANTIALI,y INCREASE CURRENT EFFORT 5
INITIATE NEW EFFORT 6
$ERvV1C)3"ARA " a=' wx~ a '1`4'1`i1
STREET CONSTRUCTION/REBUILDINO'
35 5.00
DEMOLITION OF SUBSTANDARD BLDG
35 5.00
STREET MAIN_TENANCEIREPAIR
35 5.00
86
LONG RANGE COMPREHENwIVEPLANNING ~ 34 - 4 86
STREET SWBBPINd T 4.
34 '
LIBRARY PROGRAMS (IN GENERAL) 4,86
W _ ~r 4.86`
HIGH WEEDS/DEBRIS VIOLATION IENFORCBMENT~
33 3 4.7I
GREENBELT SYSTEM PLANNING/DEVLOPMENT
33 493
MUNICIPAL COURT
33 _ 4.71
LIBRARY EXPANSION - - -
.LIBRARY YOUTH/CHILDREN'S PROORAMB 32 4.51
INTERNAL AUDIT SERVICES 32 4.57
DRUB AHUSB/ENPORCEMENT PRGGRAMS 32 4.57
32
DBVBLOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS - - - 4 3T
STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 31 1 4.43
3[ 4.43 1
YOUTH RECREATION PROGRAMS '
EMPLOYER TRAINING/DEVELOPMENT 31 4.43
31 4.43
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
WATER STORAGBIRESERVBS 3t 4,43
RECYCLING EFFORTS 31 4.43
TRAFP IC SIGNALIZATION/ENGINEERING 3! 4.43
FIRE SUPPRESSION 31 4,43
CRIME INVESTIGATION 33 4.43
- -31 . _ 4.43
{
,1F
1 a
CITY BEAUTIFICATION
FIRE PREVENTION 30 4. 49 30 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS k'AANAGEMBN r) 30 ,29
COMMUNITY ORIENTED PbLICBVo (COPS) 4,29
CIVIC CENTER MAIITENANCE 30 4`29
AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT 30 4'29
RECREATION CENTEF PROGRAMS 30 4.29
LEGAL, SERVICES30 4.29
LI7TBR PROGRAMS 4,29
POLICE PATROL 30 4.29
30
4.29
LOW & MODERATE INCOME HOUSING
30
t.29
DRAINAGE DISTRICT
PARK MAINTENANCE 30, 4.29 Ic;
30 EMPLOYEE PAY PLAN ADJUSTMENTS/BENEFITS 9 -'44'-.14--
CONTRIBUTIONS TO HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES 29 9
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES (NICE, ETC,) 4.14
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION (SPAN, ETC.) 29 4.14 29 SENIOR CITIZEN PROGRAMS 29 9 4.14
NEW WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 4.14
PARKING/TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT z9 4'14
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (INSPECTIONS ECT,) 29 4.14
LIBRARY REFERENCE SERVICES - - 4.14
NEW ATHLETIC I'IBLb5 2B 4.00
BUILDING INSPECTION 29 4.00
28
SIGN VIOLATION ENFORCEMENT
4.00 ` j
CURRENT HOTELIMOTBL TA)< CONTRIBUTIONS 28 4.00
EMERGENCY MEDICAL (AMBULANCE) ' 00
WK MANAGEMENT 2$ 4.00
j
ECON DRY UTILITY INCENTIVE RATES 28 4,00
2$
j ECON DEV UTILITY 1NCENTIVE LINES 4
( DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT (MAIN ST,, ETC,) 28 4.00
INFO/DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 28 4100
PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT - 400
LIBRARY AUDIO/VISUAI. SERVICES 27 3.86
ANIMAL. CONTROL 27 3.86
ECON DEV INCENTIVES (TAX ABATE, ECT.) 27 3,86
3.86
NEW PARKS/PARK 47XPANSION 27
26
OPERATIONS ANALYSIS (QUEST) SERVICES 3 71~
24
1'LEW ATIILETIC PROGRAMS _ -
- 1
a
t
12
,
1
1
{ yy .
i~
Below are apbc fio uctiona or dire Um given to staff by individual CoW.ilmembera
for development of aw 1991 92 amt al budget . , 4
"Make certain that we rnaximi2e training and prokssioral development
programs for Y1 stadfand especially for polke, "
"Review carefully all economic development activities of the city and
rank their relative value to the taxpayers, "
t
'r-mdaue all activities flat support the Beautirwadon Program of C
the city, including code enfnrcemcnt and sign neguladoa. "
"Expand as appropriate the Community Oriented Policing Program, " a
"Prepare a budget similar to 1990-91 without a tax increase. "
`i
"k addition to above, prepare a budget with suggasdons for a small
tax iwreaao, but below effective rate. '
"My indtial thought Al contemplating this year's budget issues is
that it will he lighter and tougher than the provious years, " e
"I think the council is going to be pressured more in '91 than in the E
past several years to hold down the tax rate. I could be mistaken, but I
am afraid that We will be the, climate with more citizens getthng into the
act and possibly even pressing to cut the rate, "
"lust be fvrowarnodl It's goieg to be worse because we can see no
light ahead, "
"Reduce cost ofgeneral goverrrmest through roorgaa&wtion of city mall: "
"Reduce cost of park31tocreadoo services by piecing spariflc prognrmg
on a self-sustaining basis (PRIME EXAMPLE., North Lakes tennis program). "
i
"Encourage development of airport through proacdve measures (use the
airport board as ambassadors to advertise), "
"Increase efforts in beauiificadoo by concentrating on elimhution of
subslandard focilides/buiOngs, -
'Reduco cost of police operadow by reevaluadug curtest 'take home'
polio of city police cars, "
N„
r .
v
..O
r ~Y
I
t
Below tire, s x t r6'~`0. „
I"it10 110h011a q direction 9tyM to $tItX by iudkVWW V4UWJmembafi►
for &VI04meot of 16 1991-92 naua~t budget,
"Fund internal o"t fuWAM out of current revenues,
"Specll➢c direCtion or programs for staff to emphasize in preparing
tie 1991-92 budget (the fast item 14sted boing the bigbest priority,);
1) Sera XaudihW Pmgram;
2) C D. P. Program;
3) Affmwdve Action;
4) Ecommic L1eve
loprnrvlh,
5) Martin Luther King !r. Ceater,Sydf;
6) Street Malnienance;
7) Code Enforcemeat;
8) Lung Raage P/aaniag;
i 9) Planning for North, South, But dt West thoroughfare; and
10) Witer Supply and Qnafity.
"Mite plan for high tech IN and Police dispitch (conywter assisted). "
"Re-examine hWth benefits. "
I I
r
f $
!
S
i
I
j
i
r 9
r
t ~ 11
1
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 16, 1991
The Council convened into the Work Session at 5:15 p.m. in the
Civil Defense Room.
PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Boydj Council
Members Alexander, Ryer, Gorton, Hopkins and
Trent.
ABSENT: None
1. The Council convened into the Work Session to discuss
legal matters (considered action in xelsoe v. City), real
estate, and personnel/board appointments (considered
appointments to the Building Code Board, Community Development
Block Grant Committee, the Electrical Code Board, the Historic
Landmark Commission, the Human Services Committee, the Downtown
Advisory Board and the Sign Board of Appeals,)
5:45 p.m.
11 The Council received a report and held a discussion
regarding a recommendation on median construction for Loop 288
and gave staff direction.
Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that the Highway
Department had notified the City that plans were being
formulated for the design of Highway 288 and asked how the City
would like the medians. Staff was recommending raised medians.
Consensus was to proceed with the raised medians.
2. The Council received a report and held a discussion
regarding the space plan and gave staff direction.
Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation, stated that
the study would inventory all of the City's present facilities,
identify existing constraints in the various buildings and
develop a fifteen year forecast for future personnel/facility
requirements with a list of future neeids for space
requirements. Also recommendations for renovations and repairs
would be developed. Seven proposals were received for the
project. Staff was recommending Corgan Associates who had
submitted a proposal not to exceed $72,500 for the project.
Consensus of the Council was to proceed with a contract for
Corgan Associates.
3. The Council received a report and held a discussion
regarding the proposed contracts with waste Management of Texas
regarding the transfer of assets and the construction and
operation of a transfer station.
i
.3
Ti
F
City of Denton City Council Minutes
April 16, 1991
Page 2
Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that one
more analysis had been done as to what the terms of the
contract were and what that did to the residential rates. Four
ha-sic concepts were analyzed. These included sell the
commercial and sign the transfer station contract which would
be completed by October 1993, sell the commercial and contract
for a transfer station which would be completed by October
1995, sell the commercial and keep the landfill, and continue
status quo. A detailed analysis was included in the agenda
back-up materials,
Council Member Ay
landfill would beclosed kin 18h months whichSwouldlmeanh that tin
addition to what was currently put in the landfill, an extra
included. Was that no; a suwaste bstan ia1 g1ncrease in the flowd be
into
the landfill and did the City have the equipment and manpower
to handle such an increase,
Nelson replied that a
added for equipment and marpowerely $200,000 per year would be
y
Council Member Ayer stated that the contract indicated that 180
days after Waste Management received Its transfer station, Denton had to stop puttin
g permit for the
landfill, What would happen if, when that timetecame,o the
landfill wire not full.
Nelson replied that at that point they would be close enough to
the closure that it would be up out of the ground and there
were would be a pit to put a top on.
Council Member Ayer stated that the "profit" for the City
increased dramatically after the 2001, Would that kind of
escalation continue after the year 2005.
Nelson replied it was possible but that it was hard to hold the
rates that high.
Council Member Hopkins asked if the cost of a new landfill was
included in the figures for Scenario 8.
Nelson replied yes that in 1996 there would be an increase in
the rates for the landfill costs.
Council Member Hopkins stated that Option 1 would reject both
contracts ind continue status quo, The previous assumption was
that that Could not be done and stay in competition. Was it
possible to have competitive rates and not lose money.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
April 16, 1991
Page 3
Nelson replied that it depended on the marketing effort of the
competition,
Council Member Hopkins stated that when the bid process was
first authorized, the City had a great concern regarding its
liability with the landfill and Subtitle D. She understood
that in reality, the City still retained liability even if the
landfill were closed. With the transfer station agreement, the
costs could be increased as regulations indicated and the Ctty
was still liable for its waste.
Nelson replied that there was a question on how liable the City
would be for its waste. Generally, the City would take the
position that if it had another commercial hauler hauling from
the City to another site, that it was the hauler's F
responsibility and the landfill operator's responsibility to
dispose of the waste properly. There had been court cases
where suits had been filed on the solid waste operator and the
city. He felt that the City had the liability for the current
landfill and what was in it but that the sooner it was
eliminated, the less the City would be liable.
Council Member Trent stated that the contract would provide a
partner for the City which would reduce the liability for the gl
City.
Council Member Ayer stated that the assumption was that all
solid waste would go the the DPW landfill. What would happen
if the DFW landfill closed before the end of the contract terms,
Nelson replied that it would be Waste Management's
responsibility to find another location at the $5.20 rate,
Council continuer its discussion regarding franchises, rates
and heavy pick-up for special items.
The Council then convened into the Regular session at 7:00 p.m.
in the Council Chambers.
PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Boyd; Council
Members Ayer, Gorton, Hopkins and Trent.
ABSENT: Council Member Alexander
1. Pledge of Allegiance
The Council and members of the audience recited the Pledge of
Allegiance.
~s
r
M
City of Denton city council minutes
April 16, 1991 ,
Page 4
The Mayor presented the following proclamations:
National Organ and Issue Donor Awareness Week
National Dance Week
2. Citizens Reports
A. The Council received a citizen report from Cindy
Wood regarding bicycle safety.
Nis. Wood stated that her son recently had a bicycle accident
and as he was wearing a helmet, was not injured as severely as
he might have been. She requested the Council to look into a 4'
bike helmet law, asked that safety lanes be marked for bicycle
riders and that bicycle riders use a bike flag.
B. The Council received a citizen report and
petition from Gay Racina regarding Loop 288 construction.
Ms. Racina stated that she wanted to discuss the construction
of a section of Loop 288 directly behind the streets of Selene,
Neptune, and a portion of Redstone. She had a petition signed
by approximately 40 property owners and residents of the area,
She presented information regarding the history of the Loop
project. She felt that information regarding the project was
limited and difficult to obtain. There had been no
notification that the original north route had been changed.
In some sections, the new alignment would come within 40' of
property lines. The residents were concerned about the
devaluation of their property and asked that the construction
be moved away from residential development. She asked for a
review of the design, what interchanges were being proposed,
what safety lighting was being considered. if the alignment
could not be moved, the petitioners asked that all safety,
health and privacy measures be addressed plus a fair dollar
restitution be made to each )omeowner affected for proximity
damages.
C. The Council received a report from C. C. Sexton,
member of the Cable T.V. Advisory Board, regarding the
televising of City Council meetings.
Ms. sexton stated that her recommendation to the Cc~,uncil was to
tape the Council meetings on cable television. She felt it
would provide an opportunity for citizens to participate in
City government. There had been many technological advances
made in the last few years with new cameras which would not
money
need more lighting and not hot lighting. There
F available immediately in the form of a $60,000 grant from
Sammons. She requested the Council to approve a Minute Order
authorizing the cable casting of Council meetings.
t
4
City of Denton City Council Minutes
April 16, 1991
Page 5
Mayor ')stleberry stated that since this was not an action
item, 1. ,ould not be handled at this meeting.
Sexton stated that she understood the Council could take action
on a Minute Order item as the Council had received information
on the item and as it was part of the City's legal franchise
agreement with Sammons.
City Attorney Drayovitch stated that Ms. Sexton was correct
that it was a part of the City's franchise agreement with
Sammons, However, in order to meet the requirements of the
Texas Open Meetings Act, the City Council could not take action
inconsistent with that listed on its agenda. The agenda listed
that the Council would receive a report and did not provide for
discussion, consideration or taking action.
D. The Council received a citizen report from '
Suzanne Bloxson regarding Texas waste Management.
Ms. Bloxson stated that she was in opposition to both Texas
Waste Management contracts. She paid taxes so that her city
government would provide her with essential services.
Government services were a civic responsibility. She was not
comfortable with a 15 year contract and felt that the City was
going a good job.
E. The council received a citizen report from Dale
Branum regarding the sale of the City's commercial solid waste
system.
Mr. Branum stated that the Waste Manaq~ment contracts did not
sound like a good deal to him. It sounded like it would cost
more and would have less service in a short period of time, fie
did not feel Denton would benefit from Waste Management's
economy of scale, lie felt Waste Management would be slower to
respond to complaints as they were so large. He felt local.
control, local management and local service were better. The
bottom line for Waste Management would always 'oe maximum
profit. He felt that what was needed was more innovation and
more self-reliance. He urged the Council to come up with a
better solution,
F. The Council received a citizen report from Ed
Morrison regarding the City's landfill.
Mr. Morrison stated that he had been authorized to include the
support of Frank Martino, Russell Newman Co., regarding his
remarks, he had a concern for the quality of life for the
community as by his personal observation, Waste Management had
no concern of the cleanliness of the community. Each of these
k businesses were exponents for the free enterprise system.
Commercial and industrial costs would double and there would
S S
a
ij
City of Denton City Council Minutes
April 16, 1991
Page 6
not be much control in the years to come. Two-thirds of the
community's solid waste was generated by industrv and
commercial entities, all commercial interest would eventually
pay for the contracts. There were tremendous high technical
changes occurring in solid waste handling and he felt the City
was selling a valu-ble asset with strong promises of greater
value in future years. RusselI -Newman, Tetra Pak, Peterbilt,
Victor Equipment Co., and the Andrews Corporation unanimously
expressed desire to have the City continue solid waste
disposition, All the above mentioned companies agreed that the
matter of solid waste handling and/or landfill sale deserved i.
more time and more study and review. They were in favor of the
city declining the proposed contracts and united,, without
excep",ion, preferred to retain the City service for the
r7 handling of their industrial trash,
Mayor Pro Tem Boyd stated that at two earlier public hearings,
the business community, as represented by the Chamber of
Commerce and other individuals, indicated that they didn't care
about the potential increase in costs that might come from a
transfer to waste Management. He was hearing from Mr. Morrison
that that was a concern. Was that a general concern in the
business community.
y
Morrison stated that he did not think that increased costs
could be escaped whether the City retained the system or not.
He felt that the City could better manage the results and that
they could get more for their dollar.
Mayor Pro Tem Boyd asked if the maintenance of cost at a
reasonable level important to the business community.
Morrison replied that the city's solid waste department did a
satisfactory service. A certain amount of increased cost could
be expected from year to year, if there were no control on
services, then there would be no control on costs.
Mayor Pro Tem Boyd stated that speakers from the business
community at the two prevtouu public hearings were fairly
uniform in their feeling, that the City would not be able to
maintain high quality service. Was that his experience.
Morrison replied that the City could be a better fob than a
commercial entity. He felt that the city did do a better job
than a commercial entity.
Council Me,nner, Gorton stated that members of the Governmental
r Rolatiuns Committee had stated to the council the need to
P privatize. His company, at this point in time, did not favor
the position of selling to Waste Management.
I
f
Y
i
City of Denton City Council Minutes
April 16, 1991
Page 7
Morrison replied his company and all of the industries he named
did not favor the sale to Waste Management,
G. The Council received a citizen report from Joyce
Poole regarding the City's commercial solid waste system,
Ms. Poole stated that over and over there seemed to be the
feeling that the City was facing near destruction if it did not
make plans immediately to close the landfill and enter into a
contract with Waste Management no matter what the outcome or
cost to the citizens. The residents were tired of this kind of
scenario. The City's Utility Director and records of the
Public Utilities Hoard minutes indicated that the landfill was
in compliance with the Subtitle D regulations, According to
the Utility Director, there were 5.5 million cubic yards of
space left in the landfill. Almost 2 million was already
permitted and 3.5 million cubic yards was available. At the
rate of $3.45 per cubic yard, revenue of almost $19 million
would be generated. There may be other opportunities in the
future, she had petitions signed by citizens who were not in
favor of the City selling to Waste Management. she urged the
council to reject both contracts,
a
H. The Council Cochran regarding he Ci y'secomme d reialc solidnwastersystem. Mike
Mr. Cochran felt that the effects of the transfer station
agreement on residential rates was very important, He stated
that currently the city had approximately 80,000 cubic yards of
residential waste per year at a rate of $3,00 per cubic yard
which equaled $24,000 per year. The transfer station rate
would equal $416,000 per year considering the $5.20 rate which
would be an increased cost to residential rate payers of
$176,000 per year, He understood that Texas Waste Management
would take Denton's waste to its DFW landfill for the next 20
years. He questioned where the waste would go after that
landfill was full as he understood that it had only 11 years
left until it was full. Waste Management had the reputation of
playing hardball. He was concerned that Waste management would
be undercutting the rates in order to make the City's
commercial system less viable and weaken it,
T. The Council received a citizen report from Lovie
Price regarding the City's commercial solid waste system,
Ms, Price felt that Denton should take the responsibility to
take care of its own waste and that the City did a good job
collecting the waste,
4
City of Denton City Council Minutes
April 26, 1991
Page 8
it The Council received a citizen report, from Don
Fielding regarding the city's commercial solid waste system.
Rev. Fielding expressed ar objection to letting any contract
for waste/garbage control at this time, That objection
included the fact that Texas Waste Management was affiliated
with waste Management, Inc, Waste Management, Inc. had
received severe criticism for its poor environmental operations
in other ar%-as. He urged the Council to reconsider the
contract,
Council Member Alexander joined the meeting.
Fielding c,>ntinued that he felt the issue had not been studied
carefully enough and if it had beet studied, the results had
not been well communicated to the public, what were the '
alternatives other than the contract with Waste Management.
Mayor Pro Tem Boyd asked Fielding if he knew the Council had
appointed a citizen group to stuey the issue for several
years. The group reported back to the Council that the City
could not compete with other waste haulers.
Council discussed with Rev. Fielding the SWAC recommendation
and the Public Utilities Board's recommendation regarding the
issue and the amount of research that had been done on the '
issue,
K. The Council received a citizen report from Art
Anderson regarding a proposal for solid waste service from
Sentry Environmental.
Mr. Anderson stated that a letter of intent had been sent to
the City from sentry Environmental which offered to dispose of
the City's residential waste $3.OU per cubic yard gate fee.
That would be effective when the site was permitted and became
operational. There was a discrepancy between the transmittal
letter and the letter of intent with respect to the number of
days the City would have to cancel the contract. He wanted to
assure the Council that the 10 day time frame in the letter of
intent was the time frame Sentry intended, The 30 day
reference in the transmittal letter was his error.
Council Member Gorton requested an update on the status of the
license.
Mr. Anderson replied that the preliminary report had been filed
and had been reviewed by the Technical and Engineering
Divisions of the Texas Department of Health, The final report,
which incorporated all the comments and revisions, had been
prepared and was being reviewed by their legal department.
imilil
a
i
a
+7
a
City of Denton City
April 16, 1991 Council Minutes i
Page 9
Council Member Gorton asked for a time frame for final approval.
Anderson replied that once the final report had been submitted,
there was a 30 day time frame in which the Texas Department of
Health reviawed the report and sent out for comments, The
public hearing would be held after that. Average time was one
year to 16 months,
L. The Council received a citizen report from a
representative of Texas Waste Management regarding the proposed
sale of the City's commercial solid waste system.
Mickey Flood, President-Texas Waste Management, stated that a
question had been asked of what other cities were doing He
stated that Dallas and Fort Worth were getting out of the
business and putting the commercial business in a competitive
situation. A comment had been made that government had the
obligation to provide. Did government have an obligation to
pay more and charge the citizens more for the same level of
service, The liability factor had been mentioned. Flood 1
stated that the City would be getting out of the liability
issue for commercial waste with the transfer station. All '
commercial haulers were paying an 8% franchise to the City of J~
Denton. He stated that the president of Peterbilt did not want
an exclusive arrangement, y
The Council allowed Joe Dodd to present a citizen report that
i was not listed on the agenda as he had requested such but had
been left off the agenda,
Joe Dcdd presented a citizen report regarding revised Council
procedures, The ordinary procedure to present items to the
Council was to hold a public hearing followed by a staff
report, the Council would discuss the item, there would be
another meeting without a public forum followed by a vote.
Citizens would discover that they did not like what had
happened and would schedule citizen reports and try to have the
vote changed. Dodd was suggesting a simpler procedure which
might be called a citizen temporary veto, Whenever the Council
was about to take a final action, the Mayor would read a clause
stating "without objection". If any citizen present objected,
a delay until the next regularly scheduled meeting would be
triggered which would involve a public hearing before the final
action was taken, A two-thirds vote of the Council could
override a citizen objection,
Council Member Trent asked Dodd to present his proposal in
writing to the Council,
City of Denton City Council Minutes
April 16, 1991
Page 10
Council Member Gorton requested to reorder the agenda and
consider items 5.G. and 5.H.
Council expressed concerns that individuals might not be
present yet at the meeting as the items were oiinall
scheduled for later in the meeting and that there werercitizens
present for public hearings who had been waiting and who were
scheduled first on the agenda.
Council Member Gorton withdrew his request.
3. Public Hearings
A. The Council held a c
adoption of an ordinance approving public hearing and considered
rozoning a 7.494 acre tract landfrom development plan by
residential) to Planned Development on
p (sin,.edafamily
southeast corner of Bernard and Collins fopert the purpose of tan
88 multi-family unit development, (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommended approval). 2-91-002
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Dale Irwin, speakin
dalelo g as a prospective property owner and
per, stated that the development would be low density
apartments of not more than 88 units, He desr the
development and stated that parking would be 308 Cmiored than
required. Fifty percent of the building would be brick and
recreational facilities would be provided.
Randy Looney spoke in opposition to the development, He lived
directly across to street from the proposed development and
°_elt that there were too many apartments in the area now.
Traffic was heavy on Collins and Bernard and it was difficult
gettir,g in and out of his driveway. The entrance of the
devel)prrent was on Bernard Street which would come very close
to hie, front yard and he felt there would be too much noise and
trafflo, He wanted to see the
operty thhat used for something else
other i.han multifamily and feIrt that
deva ~
ludt,. his property, the development would
There waa no rebuttal by petitioner.
The Mayor closed the public hearing,
Karen Feshari, Urban Planner, stated that the rty located in a low intensit propeou was
constructed to the developmentrea~ Road improvements would he
property. Drainage was a prior to any development se the
flooding in the area. The clo
major sest stormesewer fthere acility swasonre
I
y a. ,
i,
City of Denton City Council Minutes
April 16, 1991
Page 11
Eagle Drive, a system which was over capacity. Detention would
be required on site with a pond designed with a multiple outset
structure detaining water for all storms up to a 100 year
storm. Drainage improvements would be required throughout the
area with the type of improvements required to be governed by
the amount of water passing through on a ten year storm. The
easement outside mofentthweoueld be constructed
00
easement. drainage
foot setback along the southwest corner of the lot to act as
buffering to the residential dwellings and six foot high
evergreen shrubbery would be constructed to act as screening.
Feshari, reviewed the staff analysis of the proposal which was
included in the agenda back-up materials, i'
The following ordinance was considered:
i
NO. 91-058
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING A
CHANGE FROM ONE-FAMILY (SF-7) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
(PD) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE
DESIGNATION FOR 7,4 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BERNARD AND COLLINS STREETSp
APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DISTRICT] AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
t
Trent motioned, Hopkins seconded to adopt the ordinance. On
roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton
"aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye,"
Motion carried unanimously.
The Council took a short rece&s.
Council Members Trent and Gorton and Mayor Pro Tem Boyd left
the meeting.
B. The
consider adoption £uncil is eo ahold a public hearing and
amending Planned Development 28 and pbyvrezoning ailpo plan Ley
land zoned light industrial comprising a total of 1.59 acres of
land for the purpose of a Braum's Ice Cream Stole on property
located at the southeast corner of Sadau Court and Colorado
Boulevard. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommend
approval), Z-91-001 ed
This item was pulled by petitioner,
a replat oaf LoteICouncil
add public hearing land s Uto considered
Block A, Denton Bible Church addition. The site was on
University Boulevard, immediately west of its intersection with
the proposed Nottingham Drive extension, (Planning and Zoning
Commission recommended approval,)
a~
h r
ti +
r
ti
s
1
City of Denton City Council Minutes
April 16, 1991
Page ].2
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Bud Hauptman, Metroplex Engineering, stated that the Church had
a facility on a portion of the property and was wanting to
build a new sanctuary on a portion of the property. As the
Church had already plotted the property where the existing
sanctuary was located, they were required to replat the entire
property,
council Member Trent returned to the meeting.
No one spoke in opposition,
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Owen `Lost, Urban Planner, stated that this was a 9.624 acre
tract located on the south side of University Drive immediately
west of the proposed Nottingham Drive. The property was zoned
single-family and development was anticipated for a place of
worship, buildings for ancillary functions and the related
parking area.
Council Member Gorton and Mayor Pro Tem Boyd returned to the
meeting, M
Hopkins motioned, Alexander seconded to approve the replat, on
roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton
"aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and {Mayor Castleberry "aye,"
Motion carried unanimously.
D. The Council held a public hearing and considered
approval of a resolution which amended the Denton Development
Plan by adding proposed greenbelts to the Concept Map and by
adding greenbelt specific area policy, and which adopted a
strategic issue work plan for flood plain management and
greenbelts,
1 Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that the
resolution would amend the Denton Development elan by adding
the 100 year flood plain as a proposed greenbelt, it added a
section of policy and adopted a work plan.
Council Member Gorton stated that under "recommendations", the
Chamber of Commerce-Governmental Affairs Committee had endorsed
the plan. He questioned the duties of the Committee, how the
members were selected, and what the voting membership was. He
expressed concern about the makeup of the Committee and the
voting powers of the group,
Barbara Russell, Chamber of Commerce, stated that she would get
back with Council Member Gorton concerning his request.
4
o<~
;`i
E
H
City of Denton City Council Minutes
April 16, 1991
Page 13
The Mayor opened the public hearing,
No one spoke in favor.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
The following resolution 4+as considered:
No. R91-425
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN BY
ADDING A GREENBEL'T' AREA ON THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN
CONCEPT MAP; ADOPTING SPECIFIC
GREENBELTS; APPROVING A STRATEGIC ISAREA
SUE POLICIES FOR
GREENBELTS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, PLAN FOR
Alexander motioned, Ayer seconded to approve roll voter Trent "aye " Alexander the resolution,
Gorton a "
" Ye,* Ayer a e of " "aye," Hopkins "aye,"
"aye." Motion carried Unanimously,ayer" and Mayor Castleberry
Item 5.F, was considered.
AI
5. Ordinances
F. The Council considered
authorizing the Mayor to execute an agradoption Of n ordinnce
eement withaCoopersaand
Lybrand to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the City's
employee health insurance and develop recommendations for the
1991/92 budget.
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 91-064
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY 01? DENTON AND COOPERS &
LYBRAND, INC. RELATING TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR A
C014PREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF THE CITY'S EMPLOYEE HEALTH
INSURANCE PROGRAM; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF
FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
Boyd motioned, Alexander seconded to adopt the ordinance. On
roll ote, Trent «ayer" Alexander "aye," Hopkins *aye,"
tmay
tion e,N Ay rie"aye, Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "ayeton
unanimously.
f '
1
1{
f a
e~
A
City of Denton City Council Minutes
April 16, 1991
Page 14
Council considered item 5,1.
5. Ordinances
1, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
authorizing the Mayor to execute a contract for the collection
of delinquent taxes,
Mayor Pro Tem Boyd left the meeting with the possibility of a
conflict of interest,
Council Member Trent questioned the possibility of putting the
contract out for Request for Proposal which would allow more
than one firm to bid on the contract.
Trent motioned to table Item 5. 1. until a RFP could be put
together,
Council Member Hopkins asked if there would be a problem with
timing if the item were to go out for bids at this time.
John McGrane, Executive Director for Finance, stated that there
would be no problem in going for RFP at this time, The current
contract did not expire until the end of June.
Trent motioned to table the item until an RFP could be
together. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins
aye, Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
Hopkins motioned, Trent seconded to move forward with bids for
the delinquent tax process. on roll vote, Trent "aye,"
Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," and
Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously,
Mayor Pro Tem Boyd returned to the meeting.
i
Item 5,G. was considered.
5. Ordinances
G. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
authorizing the Mayor to execute documents necessary to close
an asset purchase agreement between the City of Denton and
Waste Management of Texas, Inc., for the sale, transfer and
assignment of the City's commercial solid waste operations.
Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that staff was
prepared to answer any questions Council might have.
r'
1pr
a f;
i
1
City of Denton City Council Minutes
April 16, 1991
Page 15
Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that a
question had been raised regarding the franchise license fee,
The fee was 88 and was developed approximately a year and A
half ago. There was approximately $77,000 coming out of the
solid waste fund which was being used for mosquito spraying and
litter crews. The fee would help pay for those expenses, it
was estimated that there was approximately $1 million worth of
other commercial hauler business in Denton at the time and the
88 fee would just cover the $77,000. The fee was put into
place January 1 and collected $46,000. This year it was
estimated that $48,000 would be collected. That $48,OnO did
not cover the total cost of mosquito spraying and litter
crews. Regarding the operation of the landfill, the operating
cost for 1991 was estimated at $1.4 million and $1.7 million
for 1992.
Mayor Castleberry stated that he often received certified
letters from the Texas State Health Departments regarding the
landfill. He askea Nelson to elaborate on those letters,
Nelson replied that the letters fell into a range of different
issues. Inspectors came out at least once a month. some
letters were good and some letters pointed out problems at the
landfill.
R
Council Member Cotton asked about the severability of the two
contracts.
Nelson stated that if Council Member Gorton was asking if the
two contracts were severed, they could be handled
individually. The resolution was established where if the
` Council did not approve the sale of the commercial system, then
City Attorney Drayovitch continued that the Mayor was not
authorized to execute the transfer station agreement until the
closing of the asset purchase agreement.
Council Member Gorton questioned the bid bond extension.
City Attorney Drayovitch replied that there was a problem
regarding the bid bond which arose from a letter received April
and 1991. It a been brought to
to the
attention problem. waste
Management had provided the City with a letter but it was still
somewhat ambiguous. The Austin counsel and she believed that
Mr. Flood should affirm before the Council that he intended to
honor the conditions of the bid which provided that upon award,
Waste Management would agree to comply with the terms of the
R bid and to fulfill the terms of the bid within 30 days after
the Council notified Waste Management or they would forfeit the
amount of the bid bond.
s
~ r' •YI
a
y
City of Denton City Council Minutes
April lb, 1991
Page 16
Council Member Gorton asked
executed before a vote was if that document needed
taken , to be
Drayovitch replied that Austin counsel advised that Mr. Flood
make that statement, She had drafted the language from the bid
and it was ready for him to sign,
Mayor Castleberry asked Mr. Flood to come forward,
Mr. Flood stated "so affirm."
Council Member Alexander questioned the definition of "special
waste as there was language in the contract which indicated
that Waste management would have the right to reject "special
waste" was they defined such, That left a lot of open area.
He requested information regarding what was currently done with
"special waste" in the City,
Council Member Gorton left the meeting.
Nelson replied that "special waste" were items which required a
special type of facility to handle on the floor of the transfer
station. Something which would not fit into a truck and was
not normal waste.
Council Member Gorton returned to the s
meeting.
Council discussed "special waste" requirements including what
was currently done with the City's special waste" and what
Waste Management would do with those items.
City Attorney Drayovitch stated
administrative issue with the bid bonde onescsection oof the
ordinance was revised to accommodate that information, The
revision indicated that the bid was awarded to waste Management
and they were instructed to comply with the terms of the bid,
Council Member Trent felt that the Council was about to vote on
an issue that ;,,any cities in the country
That issue was getting out of the solid waste/landfilllbusiness.
Trent motioned approval of Item 5G,
Hearing no second, the Mayor seconded the motion,
Couiicil Member Ayer stated that in his
on the side to reject the contract. He recentlty had attendeedra
meeting of the tipper Trinity Regional Water District Board at
which a representative of the North Texas Council of
Governments presented a study that COG had been involved in for
i at least two years on a regional atudy of solid waste. The
representative from COG stated that the study was guided by the
legislation pending before the State Legislature which sought
to dovelop a plan for the handling solid waste in
- 1
City of Denton City Council Minutes
April 16, 1991
Page 17
the State of Texas, The proposed legislation had a four point /
Plan: (1) a minimization of solid waste flow such as not
bagging lawn clippings, (2) maximizing recycling, (3) treatment
of solid waste in various ways such as incineration, and (4)
the use of landfills. The legislation would require each
governmental entity to develop a plan for implementing this
program. As such, the city would be required to develop such a
plan. No where in the legislation was any responsibility
placed on any private company or corporation to develop or to
implement such a plan, The responsibility for meeting these
rreequirements
stated e"privatizing does local not government. nor eliminate
municipal responsibility for meeting state requirements." Ayer
felt it would be best to keep all options open and that it
would be unwise to saddle the City with a 15 year obligation
when there was so much more to decide on these important issues,
Council Member Alexander stated that when the Council first
began to look at the issue and that after the Council had heard
the input from the initial public hearing a year ago and heard
the citizens talk about the fact that they were not inclined to
see anyone be an exclusive provider, it was his initial
inclination to vote in favor of the sale, During the last
public hearing, he had a very strong sense that a great many
residents in the City of Denton really believed that it was not
in the best interest of the City to sell the commercial solid
waste system. The citizen input had been overwhelmingly in
favor of keeping the commercial solid waste system in Denton
and for continuing the City's !
felt that one of the things which resent sdetermine the eCity's
future economic development was whether or not the City could
assure, on a consistent basis to prospective new businesses,
that the quality of services in Denton would remain high in all
areas. He believed that if the City could c•ntinue to provide
commercial solid waste service and L^-c it was done
aggressively and well, that the City could out compete anyone
in that process. He would vote to reject the contract and
appreciated the alternatives presented by Texas Waste
Management,
Council voted on the motion. On roll vote, Trent "aye,"
"Alexander "nay," Hopkins nay, Gorton "nay," Ayer "nay," Boyd
aye, and Mayor Castleberry "aye," Motion failed with a 4-3
vote.
Y
City of Denton City Council Agenda
April 160 1991
Page 18
H. The council considered adoption of an ordinance
authorizing the Mayor, subject to applicable provisions of
Article IV of the Charter of the City of Denton, Texas and to
other conditions to execute a transfer station agreement
between the City of Denton and Waste Management of Texas, Inc.
requiring Waste Management of Texas to acquire, construct and
operate a transfer station for handling solid waste,
Boyd motionpi, Alexander seconded to reject the ordinance, on
roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton
"aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye,"
Motion carried unanimously,
The Council returned to the regular agenda order.
4. Consent Agenda
Boyd motioned, Gorton seconded to approve the Consent Agenda.
Motion carried unanimously.
A. Bids and Purchase Orders;
1. Bid #1223 - Pecan Creek Sanitary Sewer
2, Bid #1229 - C. I, P, Utilities waterline
3. Bid 01231 - Personal Computers Hardware,
Software & Accessories e
i
4. Bid #1234 - 16' Diesel Riding Mower
5. Bid #'.239 - Air Switches
6. Bid #1240 - Distribution Transformers
7. P.O. #12676 - :astern Electric Apparatus
8. Change Orders - P,O, #17167 and P.O. #17168
- Martin K. Eby
9. Bid #1210 - Data Logger
"_J
B. Tax Refunds
1. considered approval of a tax refund for
Title Resources for $611.93.
C. Plats and Replats
1. Considered approval of the preliminary
replat of the Golden Triangle Mini-Mall
Addition: from Lots 8, 9, and 10; into
Lots 9R and 10R, Block A, (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommended approval.)
§PF W,
f
}
I
City of Denton City Council Minutes
April 16, 1991
Page 19
5. Ordinances
A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or
services. (4,A,3. - Bid #12311 4,A.4. - Bid #1234, 4,A,5. - Bid
#1239, 4.A.6. - Bid #1240, 4,A.9. - Bid #1210))
The following ordinance was considered:
NO, 91-059
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A
CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT,
SUPPLIES OR SERVICES= PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF
FUNDS THEREFORE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Boyd motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll
vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton 1
"aye," Ayer "aye,' Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." 1
Motion carrie6 unanimously,
B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements, (4,A.1, - Bid
#1223, 4.,A,2, - Bid #1229)
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 91-060
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING
FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC VYORX5 OR
IMPROVEMENTS) PROVIDING FOR THE LXPENDITURE OF FUNDi
THEREFORE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
Boyd motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll
J1 vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton
"aye,* Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye,"
Motion carried unanimously.
C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases
of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance
with the provisions of state law exempting such punch-ises from
requirements of competitive bids. (4.A.7. - P.O. #12676)
The following ordinance was considered:
i
r
1
' a
fI
(3
I
City of Denton City Council Minutes
April 16, 1991
Page 20
NO, 91-061
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
FOR EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT,
S
UPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS
OF STATE LAW EXEMPTI S PURCHASES
REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE GBIDSUCAND PROVIDING FOR RAN
EFFECTIVE DATE,
Boyd motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance, on roll
vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton
"aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye."
Motion carried unanimously,
D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
authorizing the execution of change orders to a contract
between the City of Denton and Martin K. Eby; and providing for
an increase in the contract price. (4.A.8, - P.O. 097167, P.O.
#97168)
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 91-062 p
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CHANGE
ORDER TO A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND
MARTIN K. EBY; PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE
CONTRACT PRICE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
Boyd motioned, Alexander seconded to adopt the ordinance. On
roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton
"aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
amending Section 25-7 of Article I, Chapter 25 of the Code of I
Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas redesignating section
25-8 of Article I, Chapter 25 of the Code of Ordinances of the
City of Denton, Texas as Section 25-9; adding provisions to
Article I, chapter 25 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Denton, Texas, and designating same as Section 25-8; revising
tap and loop installation fees, and meter relocation fees;
providing for the issuance of permits for tap and loop
installation; establishing charges for work not specified;
predioviding for the
xclusivelyinstallation
toa fire o sprinkler s systems without rcharge
or at reduced cost.
1 _
♦ M
1
f~
1
j
h
t
City of Denton City Council Minutes
April lo, 1991
Page 21
David Ham, Manager of Construction Projects, stated that tap
and loop fees had not been increased since 1984. These fees,
were highly subsidized by the utilities
at this time, Coup Of
Department. The Utilities staff had met with a g
thrh the plumbers Deand velodevelo Committeeo 9o develop htheeordinance mmeKey
Economic and loop fees over a two year
provisions were (1) incraeas to arrive at a self-supporting fee
period at 508 each year tap and
structure, (2) provided for citize zaCity of inst lled
loop fee construction in sprinklers taps free in order
construction, (3) installed fire sp stems, and (4)
to encourage installation of fire sprinkler systems,
fee e
cons orcesr than a estimated p afees dvancer paid less
gave a refund to a c
forces
construct by City
' indicated. The Public Utilities Board recommended approval,
The following ordinance was considered:
NCB. 91-063
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 25-7 OF ARTICLE It
DFNTON'R T25 OF EXAS i TREDESHE CODE RSECTIONS OF 8T OF CITYTICOE
CHAPT
11 CH,
T, CHAPTER 25 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAS AS SECTION 25-9i ADDING PROVISIONS TO +
OF THE
ARTICLE I, CHAPTER 25 OFNTHE CODE OF GNATINGORDINANCESSECTION
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, DESI SAME AS
25-81 REVISING TAP AND LOOP INSTALLATION FEES, AND
METER SE FOR T7 AP &E5 LOOP PROVIDING E ISSUANCE OF
INSTAL ATIONI SSTA13LISHING
PERMIT
CHARGES FOR WORK NOT SPECIFIED; PROVIDING FOR THE
SYSWATER TAPS TEMS WITHOUTDCHARGE
INSTALLATION OR INSPECTION OF
OR TO FIRE E SPRINKLER
REDUCED COST; REPEALING ;FOR AAL PENALTY ORDINANCES IN THE
CONFLICT
MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $500.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOFt PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE+ AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE,
On roll
Boyd motioned, Ayer seconded to "adopN tHopkinsna aye," Gorton
vote, Trent "aye" Alexander" andlMayor Castleberry "aye."
"aye+" Ayer "aye.," Boyd aye+
Motion carried unanimously.
6. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
1a , , re
T
City of Denton City Council Minutes
April 16, 1991
Page 22
Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, presented the following
information:
A. The Mayor had met with members of the Perot Group
to discuss a foreign trade zone. The Group had requested a
letter of support from the City of Denton regarding this trade
zone, with Council's permission, staff would draft a letter of
support for the Mayor's signature.
Council discussed the issue centering on whether or not this
was an abatement issue. Several of the Council Members felt
this was a hurried issue and were uncomfortable authorizing the
Mayor to sign a letter of Council support until they had more
details on the issue. The Mayor could provide his personal +
support but not the support of the entire Council until staff
and Council had more time to investigate the issue.
B. There would be a special meeting April 23, 1991
to allow the Council to discuss board Npointments. The
foreign trade zone issue could also be included in that meeting.
Council Member Gorton asked that the County position and DISD
position be included in the information presented at the next
meeting.
C. There would be a special meeting April 30, 1991
to consider the sprinkler ordinance and the space flan.
D, Court of Record - City Pttorney Drayovitch stated
that a request had been sent to Representative Horn regarding
amendments and the three County Court-at-Law Judges had been
contacted to discuss the legislation. The Judges voiced
several valid concerns. The City would work with the Judges to
obtain an amendment regarding a technical issue regarding a
statement of facts on appeal. The concern was that the
Court-at-Law Judges did not want to have to hear appeals again
which would be supportive of the City's goals.
7. There was no official action taken on Executive
Session items discussed during the Work Session Executive
Session.
L. New Business
The following items of New business were suggested by Council
Membors for future agendas:
A. Mayor Pro Tem Boyd indicated that he would like
staff to look into a helmet law, the televising of Council
meetings and the proposal for the City to become the exclusive
provider for the solid waste sorvice in the Ci;:y.
i55t r '
l r `i
`r City of Denton City Cn
April 16, 1991 uncil Minutes
Page 23
B. Council Member Alexander echoer! Boyd's request
for the City exclusive contract and asked that it be presented
as soon as possible.
C. Council Member Gorton wanted staff to look into
the concerns expressed by Mrs. Racina in her citizen report.
9. The Council did not meet in Executive Session during
the Regular Session.
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:00
p.m.
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
r
JE F WRL ER
CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
s
33810
i
i
E
,
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES J
APRIL, 23, 1991 1
The Council convened into the Special Call Session at 5;15
p.m, the Civil Defense Room.
PRESENT; Mayor Castleberr
Members Alexander, MAyer Pro Tom Boyd; Council
Trent, y Gorton, Hopkins and
ABSENT: None
1' The Council convened
legal matters into Executive Session to discuss
(considered action i
considered action n Kelsoe
personnel/board a in Verhotz_ v_ City), real 'estate and
and
Purloin ppolntments (considered appoiments Committee the e ElBoeactrd Community Developmentnt Block to the
ri cal Code Board, the Historic Grant
Commission, the Human Services La
Board and the Sign ndmark
Committee, the Downtown Advisory
Board of Appeals,)
2. The Council received a
of a formal letter of su report and considered a
trade zone. Pport for an I35W corridor approval
hinda Ratliff, Economic Development Coordinator,
she was ready to respond to any questions
stated that
have. the Council
might
Council Member Gorton asked what additional benefits a
trade zone would have above and beyond what
Amendment gave. foreign
the Freeport
Ratliff responded that the inventor nder the
foreign trade zone was an Y which was exam t
or imported. any inventory which was being uexported
Freeport Amendment re had was a no
litmiitmeti
aloimit on the inventory, The
n of 175 days and involved
certain types of materials and had qualifications on the materials, Freeport applied to all inventor
into the State and who owned
the forei n left the State through that c which came
e only exapplied to that Material l Whiwhile
been i;uportedtorWould be ex
ported. Which while
Council Member Ayer stated that the
proposed of four widely separated foreign trade zone
permissible, Parcels of .land, Was that
Ratliff replied that it
did not have to be contiguous,
Deputy Cfty Manager Svehla s
business was to im art tated that if Part of a companyis
distribution center
P an item or to be
, then
which had a foreign tr they would need to a warehouse
inventor g trade zone, h look for an area
not available which would be lost butife might be small
the company right. not locate inetheade zone were
area,
f
City of Denton Cit r
April 23, 1991 y Council Minutes
Page 2
Councid l Membther Gorton asked if
locate on e Alliance Airport property.
the majority of the zone was
Tim Ward, Perot Group, indicated that the
developable property was In Denton county,
major portion of the
Hopkins motioned, Boyd
support for an 135W corridornforei approve a formal
Trent Boyd Alexander gn trade zone, letter e
" aye, Hopkins "aye, 11 Gortonn,aYe, vote,
unanimously, aye,, and Mayor Castleberry flaye,1 Motioncarried
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:55
P,m.
BOB CASTLE81 RRY,' MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
JENNIFER W
CITY SECRETARY
RS'y
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
3387C
k
w
1
C{
't3
DATE: 05/21/91
i
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT'
TO., Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Z-91-003
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval (4-2).
SUMMARY:
The request is to rezone a 14.06 acre tract of land located on the 1.
southeast corner of US Highway 77 and Riney Road, north of Windsor
Drive from Planned Development (PD) to the Agricultural (A) district.
BACKGROUND;
See PGZ Report "History" section.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Neighbors, Building Inspection and Planning Department.
FISCAL IMPACT:
NIA
F Respeo lly subm d:
Prepared by: Lloyd . Harrell
City Manager
Ka en K. eshari
s Urban Planner
f
ApM;4114d4~11
F an H. R b ins, AICP
Executive Director
Planning and Development
2680x
Ap-
F)
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT
C:
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Case No.: Z-91-003 Meeting Date: May 21, 1991
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Denton First Seventh Day Adventist Church
307 West 6th Street
Denton, TX 76205-3215
,
Current owner: Texas Conference Assoc, of Seventh Day i
Adventist
P. 0. Box 800
Alvarado, TX 76009-0800
Requested Action: Rezone a 14.06 acre tract of land from
Planned Development No, 101 to Agricultural
District.
Location and Size: 14,06 acres located on the southeast corner
of Highway 77 and Riney Road, north of
Windsor Drive.
Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North - SF--16 - Residential
South - SF-10 - Residential
East - Ag. and S. 180 - YMCA
West - SF-7 - Residential
Denton Development Plan:
Low Intensity Area
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation:
Perimeter paving and realignment of Riney Road would be
required when this property is replatted.
A sidewalk will be required along Riney Road and Highway 77.
Riney Road is a collector and will require 60 feet of
right-of-way from center line.
-y-
: s~
i
,t
(Case Z-91-003)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION (Cont.)
prior to issuance of a building permit, this property will
need to be platted.
60 feet of eight-of-way will be required from center line of
U, s. Highway 77.
50 feet of right-of-way will be required from center line o,:
Windsor Road.
onto dtU. S.
Driveways i
rregulations.ll Noe drlimited iveways in accordance be aallowed with
Highway 77.
utilities:
Utilities are available to this site.
Drainage:
The property drains to the south. Improvements may be
warranted at the south end and along the eastern boundary of
the property.
Landscaping: r
h
The applicant should conform to the signs and landscaping
regulations.
HISTORY
On May 17, 1983 (z-1575), the City council denied the request
for a change in zoning from Agricultural to Planned Development
for 118 multifamily and 41 two family units on this tract. On
February 7, '1984, the City council denied the request for a
change in zoning from Agricultural to Planned Development a15
single family detached lots, 56 single family attached lots 13 two family lots. In both cases there was considerable
opposition from the Northridge community.
In May of 1985, the City Council approved a request for a change
in zoning from Agricultural to Planned Development that
permitted 31 single family detached lots (SF-7) and a three (3)
story, 58,000 square foot retirement/recovery center.
i
i
I
i
,y
'tI
IFF
S
+
(case Z-91-003)
Page Three
HISTORy
(Copt,)
On Apr i1 23
recommended approval ` .1986, the Pl
anning and
this Planned Development °f amendment to Zoning Commission
and replaced which eliminates 5.8 acre
Council tht:n with a church 22 Portion of
denied ibis h site. In Julresidential lots
request. Y: 1986, the city
re January 28, 1987r the
recommended denial, for Plannin
a 5.838 acre this second reg and Zoning Commission
never appealed tract in this PJ.anned gDest for a this decision to church site
evelopn,ent. The on
On
the City Council. Th church
April
recd mended 24, 1991, the Planning
Development topproval of ezon. and 4onin
Agricultural Districq (~h2, tract from Commission d
i
ANALYSIS
The the property is located
enton Develo in a low
be used primVelopment Plan, low 11 intensity area
According to Appendix for According to
ndix sin le ntensity areas are intended to
considered B - gzoning ily residential development.
Development a residential district' an Agricultural i
310 trips intensity tri DY downzonin the p ck s
have been PS would be g the lanned
21030 trips for allocated for the 3leduced,
th Currentl
centet•), the institutional SF - 7 lots y`
h, 14.06 acres Agricultural icultural zoning is use (retirement/r. plus
60 trips allocated 60 covery
intensity by 1,500 trips, ~ 890 trips
r trips, thus reducin Per acre, Of he It is the g the trip
intention
f thtazoWieventually tothave PPlicant to construct a place
there a Parochial sehoo of
land. In zs no assura)-ce that 1t however, ordinances addition, according to his will be the with
buildin s can enforce health us'
Eg used and case lawn zoning
are difficult tp sus Plataces of worshi P safety regulations
in. , but locational on
Therefore regulations
downzoning t~eaardless of use
Denton Develon
ment agr plicanulturalhdistrict being
. Institutional
compliance , the
with the
RECOMMENDATION
Planning and Ton
(4-2). ing Commission recommends
aPprova1 °f 7-91-003
f?
(Case 2-91-003)
Page Four
~
ALTERNATIVES
1, Approve petition.
2. Deny Petition.
ATTACHMENTS
1, Locational map ^
2. Detailed Plan of PD 101
3. Minutes of p&7, Meeting of April 24, 1991.
r'.
1853o
.r
ATTACHMENT 1
Z 91-003 Seventh-day Adventist Church NORTH
RINEY ROAD'
f Roy :Oj
ADDI
O J
Now
a
'MK~ ~ Y t g C~
C7
r^ H GGARD LN.
i WL4A
+'ra Cl.
.1
l \
SCALE: NONF, DATF« 4/11/f!~
+ge 5
K
i
\ , ATTACHMENT 2
.1 ),v It
~ ~ Igo Av~i,v ~(ai~
Ills
o~aic ~ / Z, ~l
441riW4rv1I t
\ r
i It Tit M(NT t N I U to
N `
\ wro • a4
10
14
EEZ= r, I , 1 !
~ k~ ~ DL C D P Ii ~
1
n { • o
a ~ v 1
nK
L~
DI.O
`p I _ I
I ~ I \1 • 1
f I
.r 1 ~ i. rw
Page 6
a F
s;.
MINUTES -
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 24, 1991 ~IF,
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of Lhe .
City of Denton, Texas, was held at 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, April
24, 1991 in the Council Chambers of City Hall..
Present: Roy Appleton III, Euline Brock, Jim Engelbrecht, Ivan
Glasscock, William Kamman, and Fran Morgan
Absent: Judd Holt
Present from Staff: Frank Robbins, Executive Director for
Planning and Development] Joe Morris, Assistant City
Attorney; Karen Feshari, Urban Planner; Harry Persaud,
Senior Planner; Owen Yost, Urban Planner; David Salmon,
Engineering; and Olivia Carson, Secretary
Chairperson Brock called the meeting to order.
1. Consider the minutes of the regular meeting of February 13,
1991. E,
It was moved by Mr. Appleton, seconded by Mr. Glasscock, and
unanimously carried (5-0) to approve the minutes of February
13, 1991.
11. Hold a public hearing and consider a recommendation
concerning the preliminary and final replats of parts of
Lots 3, 4, and 5 into Lot 4R, Block B, Donna Del Estates.
Staff Report: Mr. Yost reported that tract is 1.518 acre
located at the northeast: corner of U.S. Highway 77 and Riney I
Road. Public improvements and dedications include: Q
Approximately 390 feet of concrete sidewalk,
.014 acre of right-of-way dedication for. Riney Road,
.234 acre of right-of-way dedication for U.S. Highway 77, and
one manhole and 175 feel: of sewer line.
r The property is zoned single family anu residential
l development is anticipated. The replat takes portions of
three lots, originally platted in 1963, and replats them In
conformance with their proposed residential use. The replat
conforms to the minimum requirements of the Denton
subdivision and Land Development Regulations.
No one was present to speak in favor of or opposition to the
replat.
Recommendation: Mr. Yost stated that the Development Review
Committee recommends approval.
Mr. Robbins clarified that the zoning of the tract is SF--16.
Page 7
it
If ,
it
S,
P&Z Minutes DRAFT
April 24, 1991
Page 2 ~
Motion was made by Mr. Kamman, seconded by Mr. Rngelbrecht,
and unanimously carried (5-0) to recommend approval of the
preliminary and final r.eplats of parts of Lots 3, 4, and 5
Into Lot 4R, Block B, Donna Del Estates.
III. Hold a public heating and consider rezoning a 14.06 acre
tract of land from (PD) Planned Development 101 to sou
no~t~l the Windsorut
Agricultural district77napaoiiiey Road, located
corner of US Highway
Drive.
Thirty-four notices were mailed to property owners within
200 feet; 3 were received back in favor of the petition, 1
was opposed, and 1 was undecided.
Staff Report: Ms. Feshar.i presented the staff report
(attached). 4'
Mr. Engelbrecht asked about lorational regulations for
churches.
Ms. Feshari replied that State law says a City can enforce
health and safety regulations. Mixon law books adviseothat
cities should riot decide on zoning for a church based n
school
location. On question, she added that the parochial ight
is affiliated with district.anTheochurbch hasobeenbde rnied a
Pa straight zoning g
PD amendment before and they do not intend wouldvbeoeasier
r
aproved PD as for them to work twiis. th than rauPDuamendment.
C,M. Mayer stated that he represents the Seventphrdaay in
Adventist Church as corporate secretary, for the church. The
question was not zoned by
church acquired it in a foreclosure. The prior owners had
done the PD. The church does not desire to develop the I'D
as is and that is why they are requesting change.
Mr. Appleton asked if they had considered amending the PD.
It could be amended to meet the needs of the churn the
Mr. tuff replied triorhowners. nTheecurrentazoning does
stuff asked for by p p
s
not meet their requirements.
Marvin Mathews, pastor of the First SevemeetdtheAdventist
Church, . They d that the PA does not nes of
the churcchh. They tried to work with the PD before and met
to make it
resistance. They have decided to redo the zoning
more simple, without a lot of excess structure.
i
Page 3
n
t
i
P&Z Minutes
April 24, 1991 H
E Page 3
Ms. Brock said that she understood that in the previous
request to amend the PD, it was not only the church involved
but there was a request for a nursing center as well.
Mr. Mathews said it was true. The prior owner was more
aggressive,
Ms. Brock asked the plans for the school.
Mr. Mathews replied that there are 3 churches in the
district. They may all go in together on the school or it
may be just the Denton church by itself. If so, it will be
several years before the school would be developed. It
would be nice if the other two churches cooperate and then
development might be sooner, There will be one teacher for
17 or 18 pupils,
Mr. Appleton asked if it would be satisfactory to the church
if the zoning remained PD but it was amended to meet the
needs of the church.
Mr. Mathews said that he doesn't see a problem with that.
Mr, Mayer added that they do not want a nursing center or
residences. A parsonage is possible but they have tried to
move away from them because they are not feasible, The
chance of them wanting one is almost zero.
In favor: No one was present.
Opposed; Mrs, Dane, 620 W. Windsor, stated that she is
opposed because the proposal is too indefinite. Control is
needed for the whole neighborhood Pi;tiich already has schools,
churches, parks, and the YMCA. There are plenty of
institutions in the neighborhood already. She would like
the property to remain PD so that there can be definite
controls.
j R&Iph Morrison, 716 Northridge, said that the property has
been discussed for the last four or five years. The City
has turned this request down before based on good knowledge
and information. Under the PD, the objective could be
reached with a positive plan. The church representatives
have admitted that there are no definite plans. He would
like to see the zoning remain as is until there is a
positive plan proposal that could be reviewed. The other
neighbors feel the same as he does and he has circulated a
petition to confirm that.
Beverly Cauble, 1503 Riney Road, stated that they have
appeared before the Commission before because of the traffic
problem on Riney Road. Cars tear through there and one went
Page 9
P&Z Minutes
April 29, 1991
Page 4 URAF ~
through her fence last week, There is a lot of traffic from ,
the YMCA and th(fre would be evtn more from a church. The
traffic is bad and a church and school would make it even
worse. The approved PD shows that Riney Road would
eventually become a cul-de-sac, There needs to be ne
because people cannot see around the curve in the rooad and
she is concerned about the danger to children in front of
the YMCA. People going to the YMCA park everywhere and the
kids just cannot be seen because of the cars and the curve.
Ms. Brock asked if the proposed realignment would help.
Ms. Cauble said yes, If Riney Road could be closed off it
would be a big help,
Ms. Brock asked if there would be a traffic problem if the '
property were developed as 31 single family lots under the
current PD,
I
Ms, Cauble replied that she understood that the PD had a
cul-de-sac that would shut off Riney Road and take the
traffic away from that section of the road.
Ms. Morgan arrived at the meeting,
Ms, Brock asked how Ms. Cauble would like to see the
property developed.
Ms. Cauble said that she would prefer single family homes.
Recommendation: Ms. Feshari stated that the staff
recommends approval of 9-91-003,
Rebuttal: Mr. Mathews stated that the church is willing to
pursue the cul-de-sac and would appropriate land for the
road. The church would be constructed and maintained so as
to be an improvement to the community. They would
reconstruct the church that was on Loop 288 and as their
church grows, would do an even nicer development, Drawings
have been submitted to the City with some of their ideas.
Ms. Morgan asked the size of the church,
Mr. Mathews replied that there are about 77 members with 60
attending regularly. The church building would be 40' X
1001,
Mr. Engelbrecht asked where the building would be placed and
where the entrances and exits would be.
Mr, Mathews answered that he thought the entrances and exits
were determined by the City regulations. The church
building would be approximately where the nursing center is
shown on the current PD. The entrance would be off of
Riney, perhaps where the road bends.
Page 10
Y&Z Minutes
April 24, 1991
Page 5
Ms. Brock noted
rPr Platting ng stage that that would be worked out in the
g lbrecht asked if
Mr, Mathews replied hey had met with
of the Other neighbors at t they had met the neighbors,
have contacted with t9rs• Dane,
Mr, Bngelbrecht him, Hone
asked how ofte
Mr. Mathews n the church meets as
try to have aam adE~eektheY meet on Saturday a gYOUP.
of the group, service morni
as well with about ngs' They
Pon request one-fifth
Agricultura1~zon Feshari read the
Ing districts. list of permitte
a~IuwPPleton d uses in
d in asked a church
all zoni ingf districts.ind Parochial school are
an approved site yPlan, es but in a PD it would have to be part °f
Mr. Kamman noted that the
Districts are not that other
one, uses
that bad. A poUltra'lowed In i$rthelturaJ,
Ms. at orst
locat Biroonc,k said th a Poultry hatcher
Ms. Y is unlikely at that 4
Probablyabeslessttzaffznce the church is
Ms. Brock is than with single small there would
often, said that family lots,
the church might
Mr. Appleton grow and meet more
an amended DSaid that
could n then everyone the church would by
P its ovenslghtcould be satis satisfied
, That Pied and the Cityh
Ms• Brock said that is the logical
amendments
it would approach,
for the school, require the church
Mr, Appleton said to do
he zoning, that he does not
Ms, Brock sai see the need to change
! d that amendi
Ms, Peshar' ng a PD is said a change of
straight that the the zoning
amendments Zoning becaus church is probably re
straight zoninngtis ecost asierheworkingtwi~h aePb deniedgppsting
and cheaper is very high,
Page II
.1
t .
A
P&Z Minutes
Apr D il F
April 24, 1991 + Page 6
I
Ms. Brock noted that the amendments that were denied wore in %
relation to a very complicated PD.
Mr. Appleton said that money was not mentioned as an issue
before.
Mr, Engelbrecht asked if the property could be rezoned to
Agriculture but the poultry hatchery left out of the list of
uses.
Mr, Robbins said not yeL.
Mr, Morris said that this case is a little different because
churches are protected by the first amendment. If the
church is refused, it is on the City to prove that there is
a problem with health and safety, This case is different
because there is already a PD. The courts are normally }
differential to churches. They have pretty much ruled that
churches are ok in residential zoning. The Commission can
require a PD but the church did not petition for that,
Ms. Brock moved to recommend approval of Z-91-003. Motion
was seconded by Mr. Kamman and carried (4-2) with Mr,
Appleton and Mr. Engelbrecht voting no.
IV. Hold a public hearing and consider a recommendation amending
the general zoning ordinance concerning accessory uses.
Staff Report: Mr. Persaud reported that at the March 20
meeting the Commission considered three options for allowing +
limited retail and personal services activities in the
office District. In the discussion which followed, the
Commission agreed to adopt a "comprehensive" as opposed to a
"band aid" approach, which will deal with accessory uses in
specified non-residential districts. A draft ordinance
amending Appendix B-Zoning of the code of ordinances to
M allow accessory uses within specified non-residential
I districts has been prepared. Section I of the draft
ordinance proposes to amend the definition of accessory use
to include "customarily incidental to the principal Use and
located on the same lot or tract and within the same zoning
district as the principal use". Accessory uses not to
exceed 20% of the gross floor area of buildings devoted to
the principal use shall be allowed in the Office,
Neighborhood Service, General Retail, Commercial, Central
Business, Light Industrial, and Heavy Indu.stria.l Districts,
Mr. Engelbrecht asked if the term "clearly related to the
principal use" could hold up legally,
Mr. Persaud replied that it ties in with "customarily
incidental" in the proposed new definition of accessory use,
Page 12
t '
G:wFoDCs\dfsdsc
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE
FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) TO AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 14 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 77 AND RINEY ROAD, NORTH OF WINDSOR
DRIVE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR
VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Denton First Seventh Day Adventist church has applied
for a change in zoning for 14 acres of land from Planned Develop-
ment (PD) to Agricultural (A) zoning district classification and
use designation; and
WHEREAS, on April 24, 1991, the Planning and zoning commission
recommended approval of the requested change in zoning;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the change in zoning and
approval of the detailed plan will be in compliance with the Denton
Development Plan; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the zoning district classification and use
designation of the 14 acres of land described in Exhibit A,
attached to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference, is
changed from Planned Development (PD) to Agricultural (A) zoning
district classification and use designation under the comprehensive
zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas.
gP&jIUN II. That the City's official zoning map is amended to
show the change in zoning district classification.
SECTIO I. That any person violating any provision of this
ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding
$2,000. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated
shall constitute a separate and distinct offense.
SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective four-
teen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary
is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be j
published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official news-
paper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the
date of its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ___j 1991.
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
t
~ s
is
t°
f
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY: t~
i
i
t
i
i
i
PAGE 2
rte:
r
i
Exhibit A (Page 1 of 3)
TRACT It All that certain tract or parcel of land /
s t- ur in the N. H. Meisenheimer Survey, Abstract 8100
Denton County, Texas, being all of a certain tract
described in a deed from C. C. Smith, at ux, to Horacio
Pont, at al oa the 12th day of October, 1976 and
recorded in Volume 808, Page 9209 deed Records o i said
County, and being more fully described as foliowat
BEGINNING at the northeast corner of said Pena Tract at
a steel pin at a fence corner on the south boundary line
of U. S. Highway 77;
THENCE south along and near a fence on the east boundary
line of said Pena Tract a distance of 804.83 feet to an
iron pin at a fence corner at the northeast corner of a
tract described in a deed from Cleora Parker to Melvin
R. Dane on the 27th day of June, 1964 and recorded in
Volume 511, Page 5960 Deed Records of Denton County,
Texas;
THENCE south 89°17'08" West with the north boundary line
of said Dane Tract a distance of 196.0 feet to an iron
pin at a fence corner at the northwest corner of said
sin Tract;
THENCE south 0°02'47" west with the west boundary line
of said Dana Tract along and near a fence a distance of
318.5 feet to an iron pin in the middle of Old Sanger
Road at the southwest 'corner of said Dane Tract; ti
THENCE south 87°40'28" west with the middle of Old Sanger
Road a distance of 42.88 feet to a found iron pin at the
southeast corner of a tract described in a deed from
Grady R. Matuin, Jr. et ur to J. A. Miller and recorded
r in Volume 9210 Pale ~iBS, Deed Records;
r
Exhibit A (Page 2 of 3)
THENCE north 0°10`56" east with the east boundary line of
said Miller Road a distance of 117.97 feet to a found
iron pin at the northeast corner of said Miller tract;
THENCE south 89°53'45" west with the north boundary line
of said Mi11Er tract a distance of 109.96 feet to a fence
corner post at the southeast corner of a tract described
in a deed from Patrick E. Parker and recorded in Volume
1 667, Page 592, Deed Records of Denton County, Texas;
THENCE north 0°49'10" west with a fence on the east
boundary line of said Parker Tract a distance of 98.28 `
feet to a fence corner poet;
THENCE south 88°53'29 " west with a fence on the north
boundary line of said Parker tract a distance of 139.20
feet to an iron pin in the middle of Riney Road;
Road
` THENCE north 11" west t h middle o at Riney an
a distance of 69.95 feet to an iron angle
point in said road;
THENCE north 27°13'51" west with the middle of Riney Road
a distance of 544.54 feet to an iron pin;
t
THENCE north 48°17'27" east a distance of 24.73 feet to a
found iron pin ai' .the southwest corner of a tract
described in a deed from Robert J. Moon, at ux toCharles
Melvin Cunningham and recorded in Volume 632, Page 217,
Deed Records of Denton County, Texas;
THENCE north 48°17'27" cast with the southeast boundary
line of said Cunningham 'tract a distance of 174.94 feet
to a found iron pin at the southeast corner of said
Cunningham Tract on the south right-of-way of U. S. High-
way 77;
THENCE south 59°34'29" east with the south right-of-way
of U. S. Highway 77 a distance of 251.25 feet to a found
iron pin;
THENCE south 58°50'46" east with the south boundary line
of U. S. Highway
all 14.07349acrestof land.point
containing distance
of beginning
TRACT II. BEGINNING at a tt~ie- intersection of the steel east i boundary l line fence corner
of Riney
a
Road and the south boundary line of U. 8, Highway 77;
THENCE south 59°22'47" east with the south right-of-way
of U. S. Highway 77 a distance of 239.72 feet to a found
'y 1
PAGE 2'°
I
I
i
« -4(
A
Exhibit A (Page 3 of 3)
F iron pin at the northeast corner of a tract described in
a deed from Robert J. Moon, at ux to Charlie Melytn
Cunningham, at ux and recorded in Volume 632, Page 217,
Deed Records of Denton County, Texas;
THENCE south 47°09'33" ;west with the north boundary line
of said Cunningham Tract a distance of 126.37 feet to a
found steel pin at the northwest corner of said Cunningham
Tract on the east boundary line of Riney Road;
THENCE north 28°38'45" west with the east boundary line
of Riney Road a distance of 237.04 feet to the point of
beginning, containing in all 0,3333 acre of land,
is hereby changed from Agricultural "A" District Classification c'
and Use to Planned Development "PD" District Classification and
Use designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the i
City of Denton.
I
DATE: 05/21/91
i
CPPY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT.
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Z-91-005
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval unanimous'cy
(5-0).
f,
SUMMARY:
The request is to rezone a 16.5 acre tract of land located south of
the intersection of US Highway 380 and Mingo Road, east of
Mockingbird Lane from the Agricultural (A) district to Planned
Development (PD) for the purpose of a regional distribution center
for Weathertrol. Weathertr.ol, Inc, is a wholesaler for commercial
air conditioning and heating parts.
BACKGROUND;
See P&Z Report
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: t
Code Enforcement, Building Tnepection, Planning Department,
neighboring property owners.
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
ly sC V
I
Re4d."Harrell
Prepared by= LlCity Manager
liar n K. F Shari
Ur n Planner
Approved:
Frank H. Robbins, AICP
Executive Director
Planning and Development
2678x
1
a
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT i
To:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Case No.: Z-91-005 Meeting Date: May 21, 1991
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Weathertrol Supply Co.
800 N. I-35E
Denton, TX 76201-7168
(R. M. Salazar)
Current Owner: Sherman Adkisson
5675 canistel
Alta Loma, CA 91701
Requested Action: Rezone property from the "A" Agricultural
District to the "PD" Planned Development
District for the purpose of a regional
distribution center.
Location and Size: A 16.50 acre tract of land located on the
south side of U.S. Hwy, 380 and Mingo Road,
east or" Mockingbird Lane.
Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North - "C" Commercial zoning and use
South - "A" Agricultural, PD-691 residential use
East "A" Agriculturalr residential use
West - "A" Agriculturall residential use
Denton Development Plan:
Low Intensity Area
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation:
Until Phase III of this site is platted, all access will be
via the service road along U.S. Hwy, 380,
The detailed site plan shows the existing service road as
well as the proposed service road which is part of the
approved State Highway Department plans for US Highway 380
road improvements. The actual date of construction is not
known at this time.
s : <.c
(Case 2-91-005)
Page TWO
SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued) -
to Mockingbird Lane will require the platting of
Access
Phase III, At that time, the following road improvements
will need to be made by the developer:
o A sidewalk will need to be constructed along Mockingbird
Lane.
0 30 feet of right-of-way from centerline of Mockingbird
Dane will be orifinete e
0 24 feet of p paving with curb and gutter will be
required for the length of their frontage plus the
transition at both ends..
No sidewalk wil'' be required along Hwy. 380,
Drainage:
The entire floodway is to be dedicated as a drainage
easement during the platting process.
Site drainage is to be directed by sheet flow towards tae
creek. This could be achieved by using dissipakors.
The grade of the parking lot should be fairly level so that
the drainage will sheet off st a non-erosive rate.
All drainage comments aro based on the assumption that,
othr than the c shown on the Detailed Plan,
in the floodplain/floodway.
there would be no development as
Water/Wastewatert
A 20 foot utility easement is requirec; along U.S. Hwy. 380.
There is a 16" water line located aloa,) U.S. Hwy. 380,
There is an 8" water line located along Mockingbird Lane.
This site may be served from either of these water lines.
There is a 10" sanitary sewer line located along the most
southern property line. It is suggested that this is the
most viable option for service. The service would have to
cross the creek] however, provisions would have to be made
foe this.
There is a 6" sanitary sewer line located along Mockingbird
Lane.
Fireflow is adequate for this type of development.
The private fire hydrants, as shown on the Detailed Plan are
acceptable.
(Case Z-91_005)
Page Three
SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued)
The proposed water meter and fire h
within the 16 ft, utility easement ontheanorthleas east area need tofo be
Detailed Plan.
the
Proposed waterline which enters the property Mockingbird
shall be labeled as "Private", from Proposed fire hydrant near Mockingbird shall be labeled as
Private",
Electric
If the City can obtain
Department t permits from the State
hen an extension line along U,S Hw Highway
be constructed to serve this site,
approximately • 9_6 weeks to obtain Permits will 8 0tacan
ke J
,
Landscaping
The Landscaping plan, as submitted
is acceptable,
HISTORY
s
approval for o
On May 8, 1991, the Planning and zning COmmisisOn recommended
rezoning this tract from Agricultural District to
Planned Development (5-0).
ANALYSIS
This property is located within a low
low intensity areas are desi intensity area, Protect
Preserve residential gned primarily to Although
provisions for uses, the Denton Development plan and
providing encouraging economic development plan has
g development incentives, projects by
Denton Development Plan to discord cIt is riterinot and e ilintcie
of
a low inter,; itY area, rather the n the
be given to basic industriestwhich are generallYlean an s d wiWhithin
make a significant contribution to priority may
base, All ch
iempity
considered, policies for a low
and City tax
However ntennssity area will be
intensity policies so the City may waive the
on a specific site, Z,s to accommodate the application of
mean that site 1 his waiver proposed development
p arming, urban designoold not be interpreted n
policies are to be compromised, g r neighborhood
protection
i
(case Z-91-005)
Page Four
ANALYSIS (Continued)
Policies in a low intensity area:
1. Direct access to a collector street or larger thoroughfare.
The main access for both the distribution trucks, employees,
and retail traffic will be via U.S. Hwy. 380. The
ingress/egress off of Mockingbird Lane should be for
employee/customers only and not for distribution vehicles.
The applicant has delineated such a note on the submitted
Detailed Plan.
2. Access to Pedestrian, bike and public transportation (when
available).
The proposed use of this property is for the regional
distribution of commercial air conditioning parts. Very
little customer-to-site use will take place, although as
shown on the plan, 5,900 square feet will be used for a
wholesale store. This policy of the plan is not applicable.
3. Strict site design review for all projects within 1,600 feet
of existing single family residential dwellings.
Residential dwellings are located mainly to the west and
south of this site. The southern portion of the site is
located in the floodplain/floodway and other than a portion
of the parking lot being located in the floodplain,
approximately nine (9) acres will remain unharmed. This
acts as a major buffering between the residential
` subdivision to the south and the warehousing facility, in
4 addition, the southwest corner of the site will remain "as
is" with the exception of the driveway as it comes off of
Mockingbird Lane. The entire western and eastern boundaries
will contain a 6 ft, high living screen.
It should be noted that there are three phases for
conFtruction of this building as well as the property being
final platted in three phases. The area to the west is
considered part of Phase III. Therefore, the landscaping as
shown is not required until such time as development of this
area takes place. 9.6 acres of this site, which represents
over 508 is considered open space, The Landscaping Plan
also shows that the front street yard contains 248
landscaping and the east street yard, 208 landscaping.
Therefore, this policy of the Denton Development Plan has
been met (see attached).
4. Neighborhood input.
i
(case Z-91-005)
Page Five
ANALYSIS (Continued)
On April 25, 1991 the applicant conducted a neighborhood
meeting at the City Service Center. Approximately 12
citizens came to discuss the proposed development. Major
concerns of these citizens were:
o Floodplain/floodway remain "as is."
o Road improvements to Mockingbird Lane.
o No ingress/egress for distribution trucks off of
Mockingbird Lane.
o Mockingbird is heavily traveled under existing conditions,
The hours of operation were discussed. The applicant stated
that these would be normal business hours. G
It was asked when the development would be built. Mr.
Salazar said that he hoped Phase I would be built out by
19921 Phase II would be constructed two years after Phase I
and Phase III, approximately 1997.
The citizens, all in all, responded in a positive manner to
the proposed development.
f 5. Not to exceed the overall intensity standard.
I
Low intensity areas are allotted 60 trips per acre. This r.
particular site contains 16.5 acres of land, therefore, 990
trips are available for this site. For the purpose of
analyzing this policy of the plan, this site will be
calculated as an industrial/retail/office use. six (6)
trips per 1,000 square ft. of gross floor area is allotted
for industrial use, The total gross floor area of the
warehouse use is 102,000 square feet. (102,000 / 11000 x 6
= 6121 retail area is 5,900 square feet (5,900 / 1,000 x 60
354)1 office area is 6200 square feet (6200 / 11000 x 15 =
93). Total trip generation is 1059 trips, therefore, the
intensity standard is marginally violated by 69 trips,
However, because this is considered a regional distribution
center, it qualifies for bonus incentives, and, therefore,
the intensity trip policy may be waived.
6. Existing street and other public facilities are adequate
including capacity for all modes of transportation.
As noted in the SPECIAL INFORMATION section of this report,
road improvements are warranted for both Mockingbird Lane
and U.S. Hwy, 380. The State Highway Department, in
conjunction with the developer, will be constructing
improvements to Highway 380. All access at this point is
acceptable. The necessary access off of Mockingbird will
trigger not only the platting of Phase III but also the
perimeter paving and right-of-way dedication on Mockingbird
Lane, All truck access will be via U.S. Hwy. 380.
i
•tf
(Case Z-91-005)
Page Five
4
' All
policies of the Denton Development Plan in a low intensity
area have been met. Although this type of use is not
traditionally considered compatible with residential uses, the
design of the site coupled with the landscaping and open space
reflect sensitivity to adjacent land uses. Major assets of the
proposed plan is the floodplain/floodway area. By maintaining
this area as open space, the integrity of the neighborhood is
protected. In addition, this is in accord with the recently
approved Greenbelt policies.
RECOMMENDATION
1
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of
Z-91-005 (5-0).
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition
2. Approve petition with additional :onditions
3. Deny petition e
4, Table consideration
ATTACHMENTS
1. Locational Map
2. Reduced copy of Detailed Plan.
3. Landscape Plan
4. Letter
of justification for bonus incentives from
i Weathertrol.
5. Copy of Minutes of Planning and Zoning Meeting of
May 8, 1991.
3236a/6
M
A'1"PACHMENT l
Z-91-005
NORTH
rINGG iAO
AGiQR.I
=AM
4 TTI/MDw
for
t
L d c A T I 0 N MA P
Page 6
GOALS NO►J62~ DATA 2.A. ell
h
;t
's
t
y
5
77-
r
, oru Tarr - "'V _
t ~ C7Ib ~
00r.^
E
u .
/ rur w 5VPbP5 pr^µ t
a
t z.
m _
Y
i r ~ i \ f Inw M.s YNyy rn.rara. ~ `
N ,.ow
r`
i
CET41M ej7E I.L.Mf
t, '
+ 4
i!
I' a
1-1 ~ uclQ"elf's i
kdb, 1 nn
r. I.Y.• ...n.
Hln -~:cr.."-~+..r..pis-...v.~.r+w.+...v~t.-...-.w.v.• .
la'I INM w m 1
1111 y_-. ,wpll.auau wW S n I -
M N 1 .wAw M No n.a f'{(
1~p, WwH~IM Iw1+.Na~Hti~
UMYi rI w. W. IN.IwI' ~ II
~wYYY-~1~y N Npn 11 On...Y.l i»I ~ ,~r
I YMOnI ~Y pp In YllaYlnyr i~YM~.w n» '~1yq"'.
II ..N • wr rn) r...-..~
dw N'ny rowV U»V ~ r nr...r 1 r,f.n. b+~o
~ iM M1+i MY11 MM MOYV 1' s ' • f• '
IOL(n. tit+n~Mt LI _.,ti,,. y_..i Y+.+w-r. 1
HIH I.L Y ml ~ r~lrt~l~ ~ J'`'} T 1 ~ e' kIV~.»i
pro.
~ } n1oY Yp1N10W MU ' IrP
AfIVdWOJ Alddll$
.IOWAN am
In-
N,1 NJni ^ ~
r.w• 1 , Y ~.r.o
v
12..."'2 r 1
r
4y r
X11 _.y_ 1 [I )I .e.yy .e
it ,..1)-1 1~~'li Yil 11 i~ I' M[FM ILnIOh M'y~ y~l'•A P.~~P~~
i, r_.1__~f ~~w.vYr_r rw -.r rl»k h+MS . .1 ' ~ d fN~' RitlRPt+ n.ti~
I LI1 NnV / !"Mf4M1nf wl. N ~ wG .:.S.R'2'~r}SO
i .
i - Pn pM1PtY.^ pl2101 l'.I.. f 1
.
E
u~wG"~re irn~ r.. e!YYee~r n... n 1 i
I ~ ~ ~ «rY1Q-."n wabYwl r f
'A4 URMAW
I~
j
G
rfJ
rrr..
Ir rma+m. rrc+r_wv . '
• I•-V.4a
it"? 'APT
n .~y
,r.'' ~ t 1 M^._r!z'~,. awe.. 1't ~.a' t I'
•
.M~ IV ~ IIII . 'Y
.r /Ill
1 rYr1YYw1.
.
,0.
I I R M•.! N
VIM, 00
' Mr rYYNaUO,"fit surr r COUraHr
rc.. f s.w~ nua y
• ' YYY
' 4e+.u w.l~,.! tirl ~4.r~.. ` iwwoYl wranuna
mt~ TAI.
• rYla,~r4Y lY
col~
--f - - - :~-.:w 'w `~^•..~,..,,....y~ 11'47'1 YrY Nr~IrY
l I u YDti YYY rM.IM1 '
' 1' f tP r.Yr! Y~~'
YYY. , Yn~t
~ f ~ - .r<wtwl w.: r4
I
nrYr.li rr cmtl~4, ".e<.n:a.t,n~.^^.cS.~'~-_ rv'r A'lir° ..++.o Iwr.I.Y
site plarl
Y.-
1
,_4
t4 . i
I r~
1
ATTACHMENT 4
WEATH ERTRQLTM
S U P P L Y C O M P A N Y
u P.O. DRAWER W . DENTON, TEXAS 76202.1776 • 017) 382.9622
WhofesWots 01 Air Coil diNonfng, Heato9, Mofols, an0AppllanCBAalis
April 19, 1991
Ms. Karen K, Feshart
City of Denton - Urban Plf,nner
215 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 78201
Dear Ms. F'eshari: c'
This letter is to confirm the fact that Weathertrol Supply
Company meete the City of Denton requirement that 61X of all
goods or services are directed to earve people outside Denton.
At this time, Weathertrol Supply Company has 10 locations outside
of Denton. These locations being:
Paris, Texas
Sherman, Texas
Lewisville, Texas
Texar;cana, Texas
McKinney, Texas
Shreveport, Louisiana - 2 stores
Longview, Texas
Wichita Falls, Texas
Waco, Texas
Tho total sales for all of the above locations (not including
Denton) comprised 83% of total sales of Weathertrol Supply
Company for the year ending January 31, 1991. With the addition
of two new stores, Naoogdoohes, Texas and Ardmore, Oklahoma in
the next two months, year and sales are proJeoted to be 86X
outside of the City of Denton.
Through the Weathertrol Supply Company distribution oenter in
Denton, 98 X of all products pass. They are sent to the various
locations or are shipped direct to the ouetomer.
I hope that this information will be of benefit to you for the
Denton Development Plan. If you have any further questions,
i pleaes feel free to oontact me,
ino y,
M. ale
CEO/Preeid nt
Page 9
nz•1'ACE1nEN1' s DURAt-T
MINUTES
Planning and Zoning Commission '
May 8, 1991
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the
City of Denton, Texas, was held on Wednesday, May 8, 1991, at 5:00
in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 215 East McKinney.
Present: Roy Appleton III, Euline Brock, Jim Engelbrecht, Ivan
Glasscock, Judd Holt, and William Kamman
Absent: Fran Morgan
Present from Staff: Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning
and Development; Owen Yost, Urban Planner; Karen Feshari,
Urban Planner; Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney; David
Salmon, Engineeringr Glenn Gary, Water/Wastewater; and Olivia i"
Carson, Secretary
Chairperson Brock called the meeting to order. 1
I. Consider the minutes of the regular meeting of April 10, 1991.
It was moved by Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Mr. Kamman, and
unanimously carried (5-0) to approve the minutes of the April
10, 1991, meeting.
Mr. Salmon clarified for the record that on Page 31 Paragraph
2, where Mr. Yost says that the Building Inspections E
Department inspects sidewalks, that inspection is actually
done by the Engineering Department.
II. Consider vacating a replat of 1,102 acres of the Forrestridge
t, Addition, Section III, Lots 29R and 31R, Block F.
r Staff Report: Mr. Yost stated that the site is 1.102 acres
4 and is zoned SF-16. It is on the south side of oak Forrest
Circle and the lots are currently vacant. The land was
originally platted in 1985 into Lots 29, 30, and 31 - each
about 18,000 square feet. With this vacation, the site would
revert to the original lots 29, 30, and 31. City services and
facilities are available. The vacation conforms to the
minimum requirements of the Local Government Code. The
Development Review committee recommends approval.
4
Motion was made by Mr. Kamman, seconded by Mr. Holt, and
unanimously carried (5-0).
III. Z-91-005 Hold a public hearing and consider rezoning a 16.5
acre tract of land from Agricultural district to Planned
Development (PD) district for the purpose of a regional
distribution center on property located on the southeast
corner of U.S. Highway 380 and Mingo Road, east of Mockingbird.
k
Page 10
P&z Minutes DR Al FT
May 8, 1991
Page 2
Thirty-five notices were mailed to property owners within 200
feet; 2 were received back in favor of the petition, none were
received in opposition.
Staff Report: Ms. Feshari presented the staff report
(attached).
Mr. Holt asked if all trucks would have to use the same
ingress and egress off of Highway 380 and if trucks coming
from the east would have to cross the highway. c
Ms. Feshari said yes.
Petitioner: Rick Salazar, CEO of Weathertrol, stated that he '
and his wife founded the company on Dallas Drive in 1977.
They distribute air conditioning and heating products and
have 91 employees, They handle contracts for Peterbilt,
DuPont, Honeywell, and other prominent companies. Their
operation is strictly distribution with no manufacturing. In
1979 they purchased property next to Cumberland Childrens Home
on I-35., They have coaxed out that site. Most of their
trucking goes east towards Mckinney so they close the proposed
site because of its close access to Loop 288 and Hwy. 380
East. They plan to phase the project so that for every year
of growth they will have a 25% expunsion. They provide parts
to rural areas and are the second largest wholesaler in the
North Texas area in spite of the fact that they do not service
Dallas and Fort Worth. He lives on Burning Tree within
walking distance of the site. They plan to continue the
companys growth and will install automated distribution
equipment. They presently occupy two location in Denton, the
one on I-35 and another on Mayhill in the Pecan Creek
Addition.
Mr. Appleton asked if the new facility would add any jobs.
Mr. Salazar replied that he would be moving 30 employees from
the current location and would add 7 employees in the first
three years. They do retail in Denton, but only wholesale in
other cities.
Ms. Brock asked if therm would be any storage of chemicals.
Mr. Salazar replied that there will be non-flammable
refrigerant in large quantity and water treatment chemicals
such as is used in ice machines.
Ms. Brock asked about hazardous waste.
Page 11
1 `
r
ti
DORAFT
P&Z Minutes
May 8, 1991
Page 3
Mr. Salazar said the only waste would be cardboard boxes.
Ms. Brock asked about access to the site.
Mr. Salazar answered that they will use the State Highway
Access Read and will participate in improving it. Eventually
when Hwy. 380 is expanded, there will be a bridge under the
highway so that the trucks will not have to actually cross it.
He plans to increase the size of the present access road and
will add 411 of concrete. The third phase of the development
will include an access to Mockingbird. They do not need it
presently, but in the future it will be a convenient service
I 1 drive and emergency exit. It will not be used by customers,
trucks, or office workers,
Ms. Brock asked if he planned to wait until the City improves
Mockingbird.
Mr. Salazar said yes. The road is barely usable by the
neighborhood.
Ms. Brock asked if he planned to leave the floodplain alone. +
Mr. Salazar said yes. It will be left natural.
Mr. Appleton clarified that the access to Mockingbird in Stage
III would only be an emergency entrance.
Mr. Salazar said yes and for services to the back of the
building. There will be no Is wheelers on that road, The
widening of Hwy. 380 will already have taken place and made
the front more accessible.
Ms. Brock asked if there was any way to guarantee that the
trucks would not have access to the Mockingbird entrance.
Ms. Feshari said that the site plan prohibits its use by
trucks and that it could be included as part of the ordinance.
Mr. Appleton asked how it would be enforced.
Ms. Feshari said that the neighborhood would report any
violations,
Ms. Brock asked if over 51% of the products are sold outside
of Denton.
Mr. Salazar said that last year only 16% were sold in Denton,
They project that only 14% will be sold in Denton next year.
Page 12
3 " 1
t /
H
~ Y
DRAFT
P&Z Minutes
May 8, 1991
Page 4
Mr. Holt asked when Phase I will be constructed.
Mr. Salazar said that they would not be able to occupy the new
development until fall of 1992.
Mr. Holt asked if there will be a fence around the property.
Mr. Salazar said that there will be one blocking access to the l
warehouse doors. it will restrict traffic flow and access to
the warehouse. There will be a living screen and the existing
tree line for further screening. The railroad lies to the
north. They would like to be able to enjoy the beauty of the
creek area from the offices without a fence.
Mr. Holt asked what happens in Phase II.
Mr. Salazar replied that it will take in the rest of the lot
except for the access to mockingbird.
Mr. Holt clarified that there will be no buildings south of ,
the creek.
Mr. Salazar said yes. It is in the floodplain anyway.
In Favor: No one was present to address the petition.
{
Opposed: No one was present to address the petition.
Recommendation: Ms. Feshari stated that staff recommends
approval of Z-97-005. i
Chairperson Brock closed the public hearing.
Discussion and Decision: Mr, Appleton asked if there will be
a landscape buffer on the west side in Phase II.
Ms. Feshari replied that it will occur with the platting,
They would not be able to get a building permit without the '
landscaping.
Mr. Appleton asked if there is any other access to the creek.
Mr. Feshari said no.
Mr. Holt said that his main concern is the residential area to
{ the south but the residents seem to be satisfied with the
plan. He is always concerned when development is proposed in
an area other than where it was conceptualized in the
Development Plan but there seems to be good protection in this
Page 13
IFF
i
Y
r ky
[7
S
P&Z Minutes
May 8, 1.991 DRAFT
Page 5
case. He is also concerned about trucks on the highway, He
voted against a development on the other side of Hwy. 380 but
this seems
approval of to be a good proposal, He moved to
Z-91-o05. Motion was seconded b recommend
Ms. Brock added that she thinks y Mr' Glasscock.
floodplain is an asset and it tiese 1 ruing the to acres of
greenbelt plan. She agrees that t
n with the long range
her is a an
access problem. consideration n edse to belittle bit of
given he
railroad runs along the site. It seems that this business
qualifies for intensity bonuses but t +
what is allowed and what will be he difference site is so
minor as to not be an issue, generated by this site is so
Motion carried unanimously (5-0).
f
Page 14
~i ..4;j
is
!ti
G;\380zone
ti
i
i
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE
FROM AGRICULTURAL (A) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 16.5 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED
SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF U.S. HIGHWAY 380 AND MINGO ROAD; PRO-
VIDING FOR APPROVAL OF A DETAILED PLAN FOR THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING
FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THERE-
OF; AND PROVIDING FOR Alt EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Weathertrol supply Company has applied for a change in
zoning for 16.5 acres of land from agricultural (A) to planned de- `
velopment (PD) zoning district classification and use designation
and for approval of a detailed plan for the district] and
i
WHEREAS, on May 8, 1991, the Planning and zoning Commission
recommended approval of the requested change in zoning and approval
of the detailed plant
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the change in zoning and
approval of the detailed plan will be in compliance with the Denton
Development Plant NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:)
SECTION 1. That the zoning district classification and use
designation of the 16.5 acres of land described in Exhibit A, at-
tach,-.d to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference, is
changed from agricultural (A) to planned development (PD)
district classification and use designation under the comprehensive
zoning ordinance of the city of Denton, Texas.
SECTION 1~. That Exhibit B, attached to and incorporated into
this ordinance by reference, is approved as the Detailed Plan for
the district in accordance with article 11 of Appendix B-Zoning of
the Code of Ordinances.
SECTION III. That the city's official zoning map is amended to
show the change in zoning district classification.
SECTI_ ON ly That any person violating any
ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum rovisi of this
notoexceeding
$2,o0o. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated
shall constitute a separate and distinct offense.
OCTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen
(14) days from the date of its passage, and the City secretary is
hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be
published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official
1. newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the
date of its passage.
t
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1991.
HOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
t,
BY: i
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY, cx),
i
Page 2
t
t
yy,
jj YM
E rNY
F
EXHIBIT B
Detailed Plan for Weathertrol supply co.:
1, Development Information.
2. Site Plan with Development Standards (I page),
3. Landscape Plan (1 page),
t
e
i
i
E
Page 3
i
t
s
r~
w
i
Development information
1. Statement of Intent of Owner. To build and operate a ware-
house distribution center with a wholesale store and administrative
office.
2. Relationship to the Mater Plan. The plan complies with the
Denton Development Plan.
3. Permitted Uses, The property may be used for warehousing,
sales of warehoused parts, and associated administrative offices,
as shown on the site plan. i
4. Development standards. As shown on the site and landscape
plans.
1
k
Page 4
A
ANN
r
Exhibit "A"
16.500 ACRES
FIELD NOTES to all that certain tract of land situated in the R. B.
Longbottom Survey, Abstract Number 775 in the City and County of Denton,
Texas and being all of the called 16.315 acre tract described in the
Deed from Ivan N. Berci and Opal F. Berci to Sherman D. Adkisson at. ux.
recorded in Volume 1066, Page 807 of the Deed Records of Denton County, i
Texas as recognized and occupied on the ground; the subject tract being
more particularly described as follower
BEGINNING for the Southwest Corner of the tract boing described herein
at an iron rod set for the Southwest Corner of said 16.315 acre tract in
the apparent West line of said survey in the middle of Mockingbird Lane;
THENCE North 00 Degrees 36 Minutes 28 Seconds West with the West line of
said tract in said Road a distance of 224.70 feet to the most Westerly
Northwest Corner of said 16.315 acre tract]
THENCE North 89 Degrees 24 Minutes 14 Seconds East with the North line ,
thereof at 20.0 feet passing an iron rod set in the occupied East line
of said Road and continuing along said course with a fence, in all, a t
total distance of 228.70 feet to an iron rod set at a fence corner poet; 1
THENCE North 00 Degrees 36 Minutes 28 Seconds West with the West line of
said 16.315 acres generally along a fence a distance of 452.67 feet to
an iron rod found for the Northwest Corner of said 16.315 acres in the
monumented South line of the T. & P. Railroad;
THENCE North 69 Degrees 18 Minutes 00 Seconds East with the South line
of said Railroad, generally along a fence a distance of 471.50 feet to a
broken concrete monument in the South line of U.S. Highway 3801
THENCE South 67 degrees 01 Minutes 54 Seconds East with the monumented
South line thereof a distance of 269.27 feet to an iron rod found for
the Northwest Corner of a called 1.274 acre tract described in the deed
from A.D. Adams at. ux. to Ralph L. Nations at. ux. recorded in Volume
803 Page 457 Deed Records;
THENCE. South 04 Degrees 50 Minutes 35 Seconds East with the Went line
thereof a distance of 317.47 feet to an iron rod found for the Southwest
Corner of a called 0.111 acre tract described in said Nations Deed=
i
I
`j
Pi
THENCE North 87 Degrees 55 Minutes 55 seconds East with the south line
of said 0.111 acres at 223.99 feet passing an iron rod found for the
Southeast Corner thereof, same being the southwest corner of a called
0.935 acre tract described in the Deed from said A. D. Adams at. ox. to
said Ralph L. Nations at. ux. recorded in Volume 803 Page 454 Deed
Records and continuing with the south line of the last mentioned tract,
in all, a total distance of 289.42 feet to an iron rod set for tha
Northwest Corner of a called 1.365 acre tract, described in the deed to
Nations recorded in Volume 803 Page 457 Deed Recordsl
THENCE South 00 Degrees 48 Minutes 43 Seconds West with the West line
thereof a distance of 433.92 feet to an iron rod set for the Southwest
Corner of said 1.365 acre tract, in the North line of Block 2, Oak Ridge
Estates, an addition in the city of Denton as shown on the Plat thereof
recorded in Cabinet D, Page 111 Plat Recordsl
THENCE North 89 Degrees 29 Minutes 31 Seconds West with the North line
of said Oak Ridge Estates a distance of 424.08 feet to an iron rod found
at angle point therein)
THENCE south 89 Degrees 18 Minutes 38 seconds West continuing with said
North line a distance of 482.47 feet to a fence corner post at the
Northwest Corner of said Block 21
w
THENCE North 89 Degrees 54 Minutes 23 Seconds West with the south line
of said 16.315 acre tract a distance of 313.88 feet to the PLACE OF
BEGINNING and enclosing 16.500 acres of land.
Y
rte- r.,~j•-_, ~ ♦ t-"ti
r
i
3 C3 .
CITY of DENTON / 215 E. McKinney / Denton, Texes 76201
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 15, 1991
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROMe Linda Ratliff, Economic Development Coordinator
y
SUBJECT: "Necessary Roughness"
J
It is always exciting when "Hollywood" comes to Denton, and it
seems that it is happening on a more frequent basis lately. it
seems just like only yesterday when the production crew for the
made-for-television movie "Mittelmann's Hardware" was here and City
Hall became an actual film location for a day.
As many of you know, Paramount has been in town for the past two
months filming a major motion picture, "Necessary Roughness," at
the University of North Texas. Attached is a copy of Paramount's
press release. As you can see we really have some big stars in
town. The majority of the filming has taken place on campus to
date, but some action is taking place at other locations. The
production company has leased the Wagner Ceramics building on Loop
288 to use as their art department, and have built secs in the
Wagner building for filming indoor scenes.
Janis Burklund, location manager for Paramount, has requested that
the production company be permitted to close some streets for one
day in order to film at a local resident's home at 1903 North Bell
Avenue. I have attached a map and a barricade plan indicating
where the streets will be closed. The production company will pay
off-duty police officers to man the barricades and to allow the
local residents access to their homes. Of course, Paramount will
be responsible for the cost and placement of the barricades.
The streets affected will be Bell Avenue between University and
Sherman, and Woodland between Bell and Sherman. Paramount is
requesting permission to close the streets from 9:00 a.m. on Friday
May 24th until 10:00 a.m. Saturday, May 25th. The actual filming
will take place between 12:00 noon and 12:00 midnight on Friday,
May 24th. They want to wait until the following morning to move
their trucks so as not to disturb the neighborhood in the middle of
the night.
k
Y
y i
t
11
!q
.l
l
1
Mayor and City Council Members
May 15, 1991
Page 2
The location team visited the neighborhood on three occasions
(Saturday May 11, Monday, May 13, and Wednesday, May 15) and
obtained signatures from 40 of the 46 residents (petitions
attached). Also attached is a copy of a letter that was left with
each resident - or at their door if they were not at home. In
addition, the production company will be providing each resident
with a copy of the public hearing notice. The notice will appear
in the Denton Record-Chronicle in both Friday, May 17th, and
Sunday, May 19th's papers. 4
Paramount has informed our office that they estimate over
$5 million will be left in the metroplex area when they leave town,
and the majority of that $5 million will have been spent in here in
Denton. our hotels/motels, apartment complexes, restaurants,
lumber yards, office supply stores, grocery stores, and gasoline
stations have all been on the receiving end of this project. Also,
a tremendous amount of money has been spent on movie extras -
providing income to thousands of our citizens. As you can see this
really is a shot in the arm to our local economy.
{1
It really appears that Denton may become a Hollywood "back-lot" JJ
which can only mean more of these economic windfalls. Please feel
free to call me should you have any questions regarding the movie
production or the street closing.
Linda Ratliff j
Economic Development Coo ator
1
I
r
e
1
is
1 }a
i t
t
,
MOTION PICTURE GROUP
MARKETING DIVISION''
Contact: Richard Bornstein
Director of National Publicity
11 213/956-5588
f ~
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
HOLLYWOOD, APRIL 15 - "Necessary Roughness," starring Scott
Bakula, Robert Loggia, Hentor Elizondo, and Harley Jane Kozak in
a rollicking football comedy to be produced by Neufeld/Rehme
Productions and executive produced by Howard W. Koch, Jr., begins
principal photography April 17 for the Motion Picture Group of s)
Paramount Pictures, it was announced today by Gary Lucchesi,
president of production. Stan Dragoti will direct the - I
Neufeld/Rehme production from a screenplay written by Rick Natkin
and Dave Fuller.
"Necessary Roughness" is the story of an honest coach
(Elizondo) and his assistant (Loggia), who face the challenge of
making champions out of an outlandish group of unconventional
college athletes led by a 34-year-old student quarterback I
(Bakula). Off the field, the quarterback falls for a professor
(Kozak) who guards herself against passes from students.
r
8
5155 Melrose Avenue, Hollywood, CA 90038-3197 (223) 956.5000
w/t?~IIOUIJ~ ~ !U?/klld ~~0Y1~/XJ!1~1I ~
J
w
+ r
h
}
-2-
Scott Bakula is the star of the -television series "Quantum
Leap," which brought him an Emmy nomination. He was nominated
for a 1988 Tony for "Romance, Romance." Last year he appeared in
"Sibling Rivalry." He also starred in the television series
"Gung Ho."
Robert Loggia received an Academy Award nomination for
"Jagged Edge" and an Emmy nomination for his series "Mancuso
FBI." His other films include "Opportunity Knocks," "Triumph of
the spirit," "Big," "Gaby A True Story," "That's Life,"
"Prizzi's Honor," "Scarface," "Psycho II," and "S.O.B."
Hector Elizondo won a Movie Award and was nominated for
l Golden Globe and American Comedy awards for his performance in
"Pretty Woman" as Mr. Thompson, the hotel manager. His other
films include "Taking Care of Buslisass," "Nothing in Common,"
"The Flamingo Kid," "Young Doctors in Love," "American Gigolo,"
"The Fan," "Report to the commissioner," "Thieves," "Cuba,"
"Leviathan," and "The Taking of Pelham 1-2-3."
Harley Jane Kozak has appeared in such films as
"Arachnophobia," "Parenthood," "When Harry Not sally," and the
upcoming "The Favor."
Mace Noufeld produced Paramount's "Flight of the Intruder,"
also a Neufeld/Rehme production, and "The Hunt for Red October."
Neufeld's other films include "No Way Out," "The Frisco Kid,"
"The Funhouse_," "The Avidtor," "Transylvania 6-5000," "The Omen"
arl its two hit sequels: "Damien Omen Two" and "The Final
Conflict."
i,.
t~
-3-
Producer Robert G. Rehme was cc-chairman and chief executive i
officer of New World Entertainment, Ltd.; president of the
Theatrical Motion Picture Group of Universal Pictures; president,
worldwide distribution and marketing for Universal Pictures; and
president and chief executive officer of Avco Embassy Pictures.
Neufeld/Rehme Productions has announced plans to produce the
motion picture adaptations of the Tom Clancy best-sellers Patriot
Games and Clear and Present. Danaex to star Alec Baldwin.
The films of executive producer Howard W. Koch, Jr. include
"Heaven Can Wait," "The Frisco Kid" and "The Other side of
Midnight." He recently produced "The Long Walk Home" and, in
partnership with Gene Kirkwood, produced "Gorky Park," "The Keep"
j
and "The Idolmaker." Koch Jr. has also served as president of
Rastar Films, where he supervised such projects as "Peggy Sue Got
Married," "The Secret of My Success" and "Nothing in Common." k)
The films of director Stan Dragoti include "She's Out of
Control," "The Man With One Red Shoe," "Mr. Mom," and "Love At
First Bite."
Screenwriters Rick Natkin and Dave Fuller co-wrote "The
Taking of Beverly Hills" (with David Burke) and the HBO telefilm
"The Heist" (with William Irish, Jr.). Natkin's screenplays
include "Purple Hearts" (also as asuociate producer), "Night of
the Juggler" and "The Boys in Company C."
Paramount Pictures is a Paramount communications Company.
041591
a
)l 17M g
AM IL Vs
*I oouAar
7Wn
` t
I
kjjl~
KWOS
QiM1a F`3ra°rr.. prp
tl r,~ I!(.F-' i~•-. ~
~__,``rf Y}d~ -~f-"`.~I--•.__._~~/y~/I ~i hICK .K y `•.~.7.
r YvIr.J.Aaa :f `w"JIWrrEN VC ES (fir! + gut
'ALL 'E~vE1 t 3:,~\ n `%Cx blr 4C4` y~g
70%F~r, v~ ~y ~r1+
-•.-4K ,
644 iFi~.~'E-7///~• a ! Oro"I L L_1'. h"ND$pr•
¢ -ii~R
-.wlL~lt!~ HLaFNt~~i; NEn
Is =---``kf(~''~kINOSpaaaE~rxd~( ~,I sr_~_,~-._ N~NGS~ ~/1WiH/~►'~; .``'tiP a
_ e`uy a o f
^1(V7 mAll r), ':YE Alf I~@'r-"~
III iIL_n• 47 ~ `~:'I,~~. ~
EX Z
- F P'~ y. 9! IJ 7 A1'I~III,AMSY4A0 N.Y~!_ j
cETaao III 1 - _ •csoty oa_.Y.~
z` r; j GF .:Jim 60171010
_ .:1Ar0O .~.~I {r q•E.~~QA7 _ '„Cps- ~~i
00,
i'~--
'i I f ~ A+tt.AY Y ~1~ 31 I T ~ + I ~ ~I 1 i --ESE*Y~`id~
-UREl
r
- s•,Ea,f 'AOL _ _ .J ~N4f ±~Fwdl^'~y+ 0. ?
yr ,80 I !I Sir%, r.~
j ci C
U n.1M°iJS V~L.
GOLF~CMRSE
I' ~ ri LJ
' ':.I.~ kk~
gg is ~A1'.HpaE
. r". -
_tu'Y >raAOii~w II aEtUacc
Fts: n `s
-l "40 nAA
rap
7
_XAS i+c Mid
W14.4 `7 X!
/ym'•rY✓ RISLEY
,c<~ ':TM S'{'~ / yy II ' ~ •~-~1 ~ 'f-'-'" i ELfyE.vrrir"
.1 ~._.i ~`t•' 10 d~JI-`•(Ji k_ Nii 7~i 1~°S:I -~i1IiIPC r~ M'
a~?~ =-~Ep
„ es'^' ' ~.,nr• <:r~, ;°v,s;l aaaxow
/ZZ
~l c.r
;S
v
ROAD CLOSED
DE OR o~
ti
RO ER
THMAJ RA TO
WOODLAND I
DETOUR D TO
I
b BELL CLOSED
DETOUR TO SHERMAN
I Flf101.3a
UNIVERSITY DRIVE
z I
w
~
N BELL CLOSED W
all U INORTHBOUNNDIF
Z Q
a BARRICADE PLAN FOR
J m BELL AVENUE
4${
7 REQUEST FOR STREET CGOSURF
Organization requesting sttest closuta__ PARAMOUNT PICTURES
"NR[:FSSARY RQUaUU
Contact Person: .IANIq B 1 K :ND LOCATION MANAGER
Address;- 19,21 Elwardg.gapm Oy Penton Texas 76201
Phone Number: 817J280-0028
Street TO Be C109ed:_Bell between F. University & Sherman and W,odland
between Bell and Sherman.
Date and Time To Be Closed: Friday, May 24, 1991
Intersecting Streets:! See Above
Reason For Closure:_ For Filming
Please Cosplete the bottom portion of this fora. &LI residents
and/oc businesses affected by the street closure MUST be
contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor
or in opposition to the street closure.
~d(resf.
AUTHORIZED
LESS 9ION71TVRE FAVOR/OPPOSC
L. Ice 0 2: 44-~~
/ l
' 2. /qOZ IV,
JAI) LrVO~
3 . yJr '
5. 3
(J. K ~nO O
e,a-OD~T
10 22/2 /V _9z
2983C/5
1 '
a~
l
REQUEST FOR STREET' CLOSURE
Organization requesting StLeet CIORU,a_ PARAMOUNT PICTURES
Contact Person, 0 ATION MANAGER
Address:- , 2t Fd„Q,.,tC on Texas 76201
Phone Number: 8171380-0028
StrPSt To Be closed: Bell between E, University & Sh~ erman and Woodland
between Bell
Date and Time To Be Closed: andSherman.
Friday, May 24, 1991
Intersecting Streets; See Above
Reason For Closure; For Filmin +
Please complete the bottom portion of this form,
and/or businesses affected by the street closure ceMUSTeRbe
contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor
or in opposition to the street closure.
AUTHORIZED
TURE V0 E
1. ~hI iFYSI I t ~Jq_ 4-L3 ( uszf 9
ctuo
A ~W7CN~
2. ~j 1 ~AI ~n~Y 4
4. 6.
7.
S.
6 a cif D ~,i (cam '
to . Gv
2963C/S
Y
REQUEST FOR STREET CLOBUFtF 3
f
organization requesting street 1Q10SUV,-_ PARAMOUNT PICTURF,S t
"NECESSARY lIGI NESS°
Contact Person;_ JANIS BURKLUND LOCATION MANAGER
Address 19,21 F.dwnrds. Room 94 Denton, Texas 76201
Phone Number;__ 817138()-0028
f
Street To Be Closed: Bell between E. University & Sherman and Woodland +
between Bell and Sherman,
Date and Time To Be Closed: Friday, May 24, 1991
Intersecting Streets; See Above
Reason For Closuce: For Filming
Please complete the botton portion of this torn, &kk residents
and/or businesses affected by the street closuce MUST be
contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor
or in opposition to the street closure.
AUTHORIZED
- 8 S19NATURN FAVOR/OPPOSE
1. 3
19, M
-7 ~u
4. Q0
6.
k
7,
e.
9.
i
10 . r '4~111
Z993ClS
w -
REOUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE
Organization requesting street closure_ ARAMOUNT PICTURES
'INFOFSSARY RO CHNFSS',
Contact Person: _1ANTS BURKLUND LOCATION MANAGER
Address: 1921 Fdmards. Room !14 Denton, Texas 7620L
Phone Number:- m 7/38o-oan
Street To Be Closed: Bell between E. University & Sherman and Woodland
between Bell and Sherman.
Date and Time To Be Closed:_ Friday, May 24, L991
intersecting Streets: See Above
Reason For Closure: For Filming l
Please Complete the bottom portion of this tor>R, g~ residents
and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST. be
contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor
or in opposition to the street closure.
NAME AUTHORIZED
or BUSINESS SIGYATURE
v s /o
3.
r r
4
e
8.
9.
2953C/5
k
t i
r
Fi
REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE
A
Organization requesting street closure- 1.,RAMOUNT PICTURES q
"NECESSARY ROUGHNESS"
Contact Person:,JANTS BURKLUND LOCATION MANAGER
Address: _ 921Rdwards, Rogm /14 Denton, Texas 76201
Phone Number: 817/380-0028
Street To Be Closed: Bell between E,_ University & Sherman and Woodland
between Bell and Sherman.
Date and Time To Be Closed: Friday, May 24, 1991
intersecting streets: See Above
Reason Vot Closure: For Filming
Please complete the bottom portion of this tors. &IL residents
and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST be
contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor
or in opposition to the street closure.
A%
AUTHORIZED
9~-$US~t~!►SS SIONATVRE FAVOR/OPPOSZ
14
3.
b 7, e. ~c-
4.
.12
s.
oG N, nj~
e.7 .?a Qe.
9 , V Q,
29B3C/5
i
L
ti
`s
May 11, 1991
Dear Neighbors:
Hollywood is coming to your neighborhood!
On Friday May 24th, Paramount Pictures will be at 1903 N. Bell
filming scenes for the motion picture "Necessary Roughness,"
Because of the narrowness of your beautiful tree lined streets we
will need to re-route traffic to allow us to safety park our trucks and
conduct our filming, We will of course allow residents in to their
homes. We are proposing to detour traffic at Bell and Bast University I
and at Bell and Sherman. At Woodland and Sherman and Woodland
at Frame we will have police officers to allow residents safely in. All
street closures will take place between 9:00am Friday the 24th and
10:00am on Saturday the 25th. (We actually will be done with "
filming at around midnight the 24th - but would not want to wake
anyone with the noise of our trucks pulling outt)
We appreciate your cooperation and apologize in advance for any
inconvenience we may cause you. I'm looking forward to meeting
many of you during our short stay in your neighborhood,
Thanksl
Janis I3urklund
Location Manager
t «`Y xFx.
A ~
h »
x \ ~
Y A
OYM.IWINn ix
' T
f
1 li
F~
d!1
I
1
. f
1
CITY Of DENTON / 215 E. MoKlnney / Denton, Texas 76201
I,
/
N O T I C E O F P U B L I C H E A R I N 0
I' Petition of the City of Denton requesting a temporary closing of
Bell Avenue between University Drive and Sherman Drive and Woodland
between Sherman Drive and Bell Avenue from 9100 a.m, on May 24,
i 1991, to 10100 a.m. on May 25, 1991. This closing is to facilitate
I the filming of a motion picture, which will bring considerable
economic benefit to the community.
The City of Denton City council will hold a public hearing at 7100
r
p.m, on may 211 1991, to consider this request. The meeting will e
be held in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at 215 E.
McKinney Street.
' I
1
Betty 6*e, Executive Director
Municipal Services/Economic Development
~I
1
f
(i
~.i
59119May 16, 1991
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TEMPORARY CLOSING OF A PORTION OF BELL
AVENUE AND WOODLAND STREET ON MAY 24 AND MAY 25, 1991) AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Paramount Pictures has requested the temporary
closing of a portion of Bell Avenue and Woodland Street for the
purpose of filming the movie "Necessary Roughness") and
WHEREAS, that Paramount Pictures has submitted the written
consent of the owners of the properties abutting the portions of
the streets to be closed; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES:
SECTION I. That the following streets are authorized to be
closed to vehicular traffic beginning at 900 a.m. on May 24, 1991,
and extending to 10:00 a.m. on May 25, 1991:
(a) That portion of Bell Avenue from its intersection witl
Sherman Drive to its intersection with University Drives
and
(b) That portion of Woodland Street from its intersection
with Bell Avenue to its intersection with Sherman Drive.
SECTION II. That the appropriate City Departments are di-
rected to work with the film company to implement this resolution.
SECTION III. That this resolution shall take effect immedi-
ately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of May, 1991.
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRE'T'ARY
BY:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY: - tom--.
fl
iJ
,y= f1
DATE: 05/21/91
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO., Mayor and Members of the city council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT- ACCESSORY USES
RECOMMENDATION:
P&Z recommends approval of the attached draft ordinance (6-0).
SUMMARYi
The draft ordinance proposes to amend the definition of accessory
use to include "customarily incidental to the principal use and
located on the same lot or tract and within the same zoning district
as the principal use`. Accessory uses not to exceed 20% of the
gross floor area of a building or buildings serving the principal
use shall be allowed in the office (O), Neighborhood Service (NS),
General Retail (GR), Commercial (C), central Business (CB), Light
Industrial (LI) and Heavy Industrial (HI) Districts.
BACKGROUND:
February 19, 1991: With the discussion of 2-90-015, the medical
office propose on Bonnie Brae near University Drive, Council
directed expediting conditioned uap. and incidential mixed use
provisions of the zoning ordinance rewrite.
March 7, 1991: The Zoning Ordinance Task Force decide not to review
"piecemeal" amendmenta, which may be required on a high priority
basis.
March 20, 1991: P&Z discusses accessory use options, reviews other
city's standards, and directs staff to prepare an ordiance.
April 24, 1991: P&Z recommends approval of the ordinance.
May 7, 1991: Council work session.
See Attachment 2 for a summary of other city's standards.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Mixed use developers and builders.
Ei
Mayor and Members of the Ci;V Council
may 7, 1991
Page 2
FTSCAL IMPACT:
None
YLIoYOv-. lly submi d:
Harrell
Aa d b L City Manager
f
. Robb ins AICP
Executivo Director
i'
Attachments: 1. Dr otaft ordinance.
3. Minutes
2657x
i
i
s
j
i
i
1
1
J
i'
t
Ii
Kcdtay 3, 1991
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING APPENDIX B-
ZONING OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO ALLOW ACCESSORY USES WITHIN
SPECIFIED NON-RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE
MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFEC'T'IVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That article 27 (1) of Appendix B-Zoning of the
Code of Ordinances is amended to read as follows:
(1) Accessory Use, A use of land subordinate to and cus-
tomarily incidental to the principal use of the land
and located on the same lot or tract and within the
11 same zoning district as the principal use.
SECTION II. That article 19 of Appendix B - Zoning of the Code
of Ordinances is amended to add the following:
4
C. Accessory Uses in Certain Nonresidential Districts.
In the Of NS, GR, C, CB, LI and HI zoning districts, an
accessory use not otherwise permitted shall be allowed if
the accessory use:
(1) Is clearly related to the principal use of the
lot;
(2) Does not occupy, when. added together with all
other accessory uses located on the sAme lot or
tract, an area in excess of twenty percent (20%)
of the total gross floor area of all permitted
uses located on the lot or tract which are not
accessory uses] and
(3) Complies with the regulations for the district, 1
other than use regulations.
g ECTION III. That any person violating any provision of this
ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding
$2,000.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated
shall constitute a separate and distinct offense.
SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall became effective four-
teen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the city Secretary
is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be
1--
C
i
r, I
r
A
Published twice in the Denton Record Chronicle
Paper of the City of Denton, Texae, within ten the news-
date of its passage. (10) days of the
PASSED AND APPROVED this the
day of
r r 1991.
I
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
;r
t. d
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:,
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY: r---~-t~
i
i j
PAGE 2
----.ter'--• - ;
w~
r
ATTACHMENT 02
A. Arlington
Professional Business District is intended primarily for
pro€essional offices. Medical laboratory, physical therapy,
dispensing optician, and dispensing pharmacy are allowed as
incidental uses.
A single incidental use shall not exceed 258 of the gross t'
floor area of the building. All incidental uses in
aggregate shall not exceed 508 of the gross floor area of
the building.
Office District is intended for general business offices. A
d spensing pharmacy and a dispensing optician in conjunction
with the use of the premises by an optometrist are allowed
as incidental uses sub7'ect to the 258 and 50% gross floor
area limitation. Public access to incidental uses shall be
from the interior of the building.
B. Carrollton
The Office District is intended for all general business and
professional o ices. Medical and dental offices and
related accessory uses including clinics and prescription
pharmacies are allowed where all activities are conducted
completely in an enclosed building. An accessory building
or use is defined as a subordinate building or structure
attached to, or detached from the main building, and having
a use customarily incidental to and located on the same lot
occupied by the main building, or a use customarily
incidental to the main use of the property.
l I C. Richardson
The Office District is intended for general business
profess onal off ces including banks and financial
institutions. Incidental retail and personal service
activities are allowed in an office and industrial building
in excess of 30,000 square feet where the total square
footage of these activities comprise no more than 108 of the
gross floor area of the building,
Incidental retail or service activities are activities of a
1 retail nature intended to provide support and personal
PAGE 3
i
F;
5f5
it
i
{
Attachment #2
Page 2
services to the tenants of a building includaing but not
limited to, personal care services such as brber and beauty
shops, laundry pick up stations, printing anc? copy shops,
office supply and stationery stores, travel agencies,
secretarial services, candy/cigar/tobacco shops, florists,
optical goods sales, photographic supply sales, film
developing and printing, and professional pharmacies.
D. Austin
Accessory use regulations establish the relationships among
principal and accessory uses and also establish provisions
governing the conduct of accessory uses. +
1. Commercial type accessory uses not permitted in the same
district shall comply with all of the following controls;
a. Is operated primarily for the convenience of
employees, clients, or customers of the principal
use.
b. Occupies less than 108 of the total floor area.
C. Is located and operated as an integral part of the
principal use and does not comprise a separate
business use or activity. e
E. Fairfax County, Virginia
The Office District permits accessory uses and accessory
service uses.
These include personal service establishmentsi prescription
establishments, and the selling of pharmaceutcal supplies.
Subject to the following limitations;
1. No accessory structure shall be occupied unless the
principal structure is occupied or utilized.
2. All accessory uses and structures shall comply with
applicable regulation for the zoning district of the
principal use,
PACE 4
3575]
1
i
li
t
e&z Minutes
March 20, 1991
Page 11
jorry Cottp chairman of the Government Relations Committee
of the Chamber of Commerce, stated that Mr, Robbins has
spent a lot of time working on the amendments. The thing
that needs to be emphasized is the sign review board. That
will allow people in Denton to petition their pears an( get
a fair hearing. The idea for sign districts is brilliant.
They can handle unique problems, The argument in favor of
20' signs is that they eliminate the neod for face changes
because they are a viable alternativc.
Slick Smith stated that he is in the portable sign
business. It is a hardship on him not to be able to bring
his signs in for one day to clean them up. Mr. Robbins has
said that the public does not like his signs. They can buy i
them if they want. He has had a lot of people call him
that fool differently. He asked the Commission to please
put it in the ordinance to allow him to bring his signs in
for cleaning. He has to put them back in the same location
because that is where they are registered, He has people
call him that want to put portable signs at their
businesses and he has to tell them no. The Commission has
said that they want to help businessmen. He is asking them
to allow portable signs at grand openings for limited
periods of time. Banners are not effective.
chairperson Brock closed the public hearing. e
Mr. Holt asked the size of the new American Crafter's Mall
sign.
Ms. Baker replied that it is 15' height. The message is 0'
tall and 12' wide. The area is 96 square feet.
Ma, baker showod the Commission slides of signs around town.
The commission discussed the proposed ordinance and the f
proposed sign districts.
M.(, Glasscock moved to recommend approval of the proposed
sign ordinance. Motion was seconded by Ms, Morgan.
Mr. Appleton moved to amend that the maximum effective area
for a multiple occupant sign be 120 square feet. Motion
failed for lack of seconds
vote on original motion carried unanimously (7-0),
Mr. Holt left the meeting.
~vII. t)iacuso adding incidontial retail and service uoaa within
the Office Uistrict.
PAGE 5
i
~s
i
PAZ Minutes
March 20, 1991
Pays 12
staff Report: Mr. Pereaud stated that for a recent zoning
case on Bonnie Brae the Commission made no recommendation.
The City Council approved the zoning change to an Office
uistrict, The petitioner plans to develop offices, a
pharmacy, and storage, In order to allow this, the Council
directed staff to look at the possibility of including some
retail in office zoning, staff has surveyed other cities
and come up with a few option. Mr. Pereaud reviewed the
options with the Commission.
The Commission discussed the options,
Mr, Persaud stated that other cities allow incidential 4•
uses, Allowing personal services in different districts
can minimize trips, Staff is suggesting that the
incidential uses be limited to 208 of the gross floor area
of the development. That will control expansion.
Mr. Gnyelbrscht naid that any service people use would be I
allowed.
Ms. Brock noted that the ordinance could clarify that there
must be a relation to the main use.
The commission agreed on an option to add accessory uses
permitted in tho non-residential zones but said that the
issue of ownership for the accessory usue should be
clarified. They also wanted olarification that accessory
uses are those that are customarily related to the main use,
VIII. Director's Report
Mr. Robbins reported that Owen's Restaurant has appealed to
the City Council but their case is as yet unscheduled for
the Council agenda, tie also reviewed the list of upcoming
cases with the Commission.
Ix. Future Agenda Items
Mr. Robbins stated that the conditional use ordinance will
be scheduled for the first meeting in April. The Parks
Board will soon present a resolution to add on to existing
recreation centers instead of building new ones. They will
call for a referendum in 1992,
Meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m,
2619x
E
PAGE 6
5
P&Z Minutes
April 24, 1991
Page 2 ~ R A II c '
'
r Y
Motion was made by Mr. Kamman, seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht,
and unanimously carried (5-0) to recommend approval of the
preliminary and final replats of parts of Lots 31 4, and f
into Lot 4R, Block B, Donna Del Estates,
IV. Hold a public hearing and consider a recommendation amending
the general zoning ordinance concerning accessory uses,
Staff Report: Mr. Persaud reported that at the March 20
meeting the Commission considered three options for allowing
limited retail and personal services activities in the
office District. In the discussion which followed, the
Commission agreed to adopt a "comprehensive" as opposed to a
"band aid" approach, which will deal with accessory uses in
iI specified non-residential districts. A draft ordinance
amending Appendix B-Zoning of the code of ordinances to
allow accessory uses within specified non-residential
districts has been prepared. Section I of the draft
ordinance proposes to amend the definition of accessory use
` to include "customarily incidental to the principal use and
f located on the same lot or tract and within the same zoning
district as the principal use". Accessory uses not to
exceed 20% of the gross floor area of buildings devoted to
the principal use shall, be allowed in the Office,
Neighborhood Service, General Retail, Commercial, Central
Business, Light Industrial, and Heavy Industrial Districts,
Mr, Engelbrecht asked if the term "clearly related to the
principal use" could hold up legally.
Mr. Persaud replied that it ties in with "customarily x
incidental" in the proposed new definition of accessory use.
The Commission discussed examples of what could be deemed as
accessory uses.
Mr. Persaud stated that accessory uses are intended to serve
the principal use.
Mr. Morris stated that there may be some questions and he is
not sure that the exact wording can be tied down. The 20%
of floor area may be a protection.
` Mr. Glasscock said that the market will take care of most of
the questions,
Mr, Persaud stated that he has spoken with Carrollton and
they don't have problems with accessory uses. The market
takes care of most of it. Denton can try out the amendment
and if there are problems changes could be made later on.
1
PAGE 7
1
1
ii
.I
i
P&z Minutes
Apr T
April 24, 1991 Pag
D RAF
e 3
Mr. Engelbrecht said that accessory uses are intended as an
additional service to the original target market, They are
not intended to serve the employees of a business but the
customers of one,
Mr. Persaud stated that such a concept was discussed but was
left out of the ordinance because of enforcement difficulty.
Mr. Engelbrecht said that uses could be allowed because they
serve the principal market. They would not be allowed if
they didn't serve the customers, it is not an enforcement
issue, it has to do with the initial zoning.
Me, Brock asked if there would be any control over uses once
the zoning was granted,
Mr. Persaud said no, Accessory uses would be automatic if
the ordinance is approved,
Mr. Appleton asked who an appeal about an accessory use
would go to.
Mr. Morris said that it would be handled by the Board of
Adjustment. He said that he thinks adding wording about the
convenience of customers would make the proposed ordinance
even more ambiguous.
Ms. Brock asked how accessory uses work in other cities,
Mr. Persaud said that cities with more updated ordinances
allow more flexibility. Carrollton is not having any
problems in this area. Arlington has 50% of floor space
devoted to accessory uses. Presumably, theese provisions
are working for those cities.
i
Mr. Engelbrecht said that the market takes care of many
issues. Offices usually are not located in general retail
areas and general retail does not work in areas without high
traffic counts,
Mr. Persaud stated that 20% limits will not result in any
significant increase in traffic generated in those areas,
No one was present to speak in favor or opposition to the
proposed ordinance.
After discussion, the Commission agreed to recommend that
Section 11, C.2 of the proposed ordinance be amended to read
, . that an area in excess of twenty percent (20%) of the
gross floor area of all buildings located on the the same
lot or tract; and"
PAGE 8
u
1
P&Z Minutes "
April 24, 1941
Page 4 DRAFT
Mr, Glasscock moved to recommend approval of the proposed
ordinance for accessory uses as amended, motion was
seconded by Mr, Fngelbrecht and unanimously carried (6-0),
2658x
i
i
t,
i
i i
f
i
{
PAGE 9
- - - N
amo- CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT DATE: 05/21/91
TO; Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM; Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECTt PROPOSED SIDEWALK AMENDMENT
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends exempting sidewalk
construction in residential replats where the previous plat did not
require sidewalks. [The Commission's rationale is in App. Ci other
municipality's requirements are in App. D.]
SUMMARY:
Existing sidewalk regulations are contained in the Subdivision
Regulations, Article 4.04, Section Q. Paragraph 2 of the same
I article sets forth existing exceptions to sidewalk requirements,
which are:
(a) A development which is excepted from making perimeter stree+
improvements in accordance with Article 4.04 (E) (3) (c), shall
not he required to install a sidewalk along that perimeter
street.
(b) A development which is excepted from making porimeter street
improvements in accordance with Article 4.04 (B) (3) (a) or
(b), shall not be required to install. a sidewalk along that
perimeter street unless the perimeter street is a state or r
federal highway or is designated as a arterial street on the
City's master thoroughfare plan,
(c) Where unplatted property is required to be platted in order to
obtain a building permit to make any improvements to an
existing building or to construct any additional building to be
located on the property, a sidewalk shall not be required along
an existing perimeter street if:
i
(i) The perimeter street is not required to be improved in
accordance with this Code
(ii.) The building improvements would not result in an
increase in the floor area of the existing building or
buildings by more than ten percent (10%)l
(iii) The building improvements are to be located on the same
tract or tracts of land, as described by recorded deed
in the Real Property Records of Denton County, en which
the existing building or any existing improvements to
serve the existing building are located] and
i
K
i
Proposed Sidewalk Amendment
May 7, 1991 ,
Page 2
(iv) The building improvements will not require the
construction of additional parking spaces to meet the
requirements of the zoning ordinance.
Planning and Zoning reviewed a proposed ordinance that would add
additional situations in which sidewalks would be exempted (see
Appendix 3):
(d) sidewalks shall not be required for single family residential
subdivisions if the lots are larger than one acre. (This
proposed amendment was not part of the recommendation of the
Planning and Zoning Commission.)
(e) Sidewalks shall not be required for lots abutting the
turnaround of a cul-de-sac. (Th_ is proposed amendment did not
receive a favorable recommendation from the Plannin and Zoning ,
Commission, failing by a 3-3 vote.) L
(f) Sidewalks shall not be required for a replat of property zoned
for single family residential use if the preceding plat
covering the same property did not require sidewalks. (This
proposed amendment was recommended to you by a 6-0 vote.)
The Commission did not recommend a section which reads:
The City Engineer may approve sidewalks constructed of material
other than concrete for aesthetic compatibility, but not including
asphalt, if the material would be substantially equivalent to '
concrete in durability and safety.
This may have been an oversight, so we are bringing it to your
attention.
BACKGROUND:
Currently 9 foot wide sidewalks are required on both sides of a
street, in almost every development situation.
PROGRAM4,- DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Planning and Development and Engineering Departments.
Potential developers.
e
3
Proposed Sidewalk Amendment
May 7, 1991
Page 3
-FISCAL IMPACT,
Remote need for certain sidewalks done in the C.I,p.
Respectful submitted:
.r
Pre ared b ~
Lloy V. Harrell
G~ City Manager
rank H, Rvabins, Al
Executive Director
Planning and Development
Appendices: A, Recommended Ordinance
S. Previously Reviewed Ordinance `r
C. Pros and Cons
D. Other's Standards
E. Literature
1
t
3180k
t
A -
i_
APPFNDZX A
RECOMMENDED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE NO. _
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
D
EVELOPMENT CODE BY ADDING AN EXCEPTION TO SID WALK REQUIREMENTS!
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY THE OF
THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FORIAN EFFECTIIVErDATE,$500 FOR VIOLATIONS
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That article 4,04 (Q) (2) of Division II of Chapter
IV of Appendix A of the Code of ordinances is amended by adding the
following paragraph:
t:
(Q) UQgKALKS
(2) . . . .
I
(d) Sidewalks shall not be required for a
replat of property zoned for single
family residential use if the preced-
ing plat covering the same property
did not require sidewalks.
SECTION 11, That any person violtitin an ,
ordinance shall, uron conviction, be fined sum vnotoexceeding
$500.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated t
shall constitute a separate and distinct offense.
i
9LCTION TIT That this ordinance shall become effective four-
teen (14) days from the date of its
is hereby directed to cause passage, and the City Secretary
published twice of this ordinance
ice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official news-to b -
r paper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the
date of its passage,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
1991.
BOB CASTLEBERRY/ MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY.
k
PAGE 4
i
iS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: '
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
I
j
i
i
PAGE 5
qr
4
1
APPENDIX B
sideo DRAFT ORDINANCE REVINWLD, BUT
NOT RECOMMENDED
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING THE DENTON
DEVELOPMENT CODE BY ADDING EXCEPTIONS TO SIDEWALK REQUIREMENTS;
AMENDING THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SIDEWALKS IN PROXIMITY TO SCHOOLS;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $500 FOR VIOLATIONS
j~ THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS!'.
SECTION I. That article 4.04 (Q) (2) of Division II of Chapter
IV of Appendix A of the Code of Ordinances is amended by adding the
following new paragraphs:
(Q) SIDEWALKS
(2) . . . .
(d) Sidewalks shall not be required for
single family residential subdivisions
if the lots are larger than one acre.
(e) Sidewalks shall not be required for
lots abutting the turnaround of a cul-
de-sac.
(f) Sidewalks shall not be required for a
replat of property zoned for single
family residential use if the preced-
ing plat covering the same property
did not require sidewalks.
SECTION II. That article 4.04 (Q) (4) of Division II of
Chapter IV of Appendix A of the Cade of Ordinances is amended to
read as follows:
(Q) SIDEWALKS )
(4) Sidewalks shall be constructed of concrete in
accordance with the specifications shown in
` Appendix A-6, including handicap ramps at all
intersections and driveways, except as provid-
ed below;
(a) Sidewalks along arterial and collector
streets which are within 900 feet of the
property line of a primary or secondary
school shall be a minimum width of six
PAGE 6
;
feet (61). The measurement shall be made
beginning where the extended property
lines cross the centerline of abutting
arterial or collector streets and then
continuing goo feet along the center lines
Of all connecting arterial or
streets, collector
,
(b) The City Engineer may approve sidewalks
constructed of material other than con-
crete for aesthetic compatibility, but not
including asphalt, if the material would
be substantially equivalent to concrete in
durability and safety.
6
S CT ON III That any person violating any provision of this
ordinance shall, upon conviction be
$500,00. Each day that a fined a sum not exceeding
shall constitute a provision this ordinance is violated
separate and distinct offense.
$E9219N Ty That this ordinance shall become effect
teen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Se ive four-
is
is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be
published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official news-
paper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the
date of its passage,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the
day of 1991.
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMr
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY: .
AGE 7
i
APPENDIX C
SUBJWr PRO
aoN
Exempting sidewalks for * unnecessary. residential lots, * ! Could leave a gap along
May never connect up, a street where
subdivision or lots
are not all one acre
in size,
Exempting sidewalks on * Sidewalks here are not * still serve a useful
turnarounds of cul-de•• used anyway,
saga, * Unnecessary cost. Purpose, especially
y for children,
{
Exempting sidewalks in * Fair
residential replats if,.. * Avoids a short side-
walk in an otherwise
"sidewalkless" area.
3180k
PAGE 8
M
Z
APPENDIX D
i
SIDEWALKS ON SIDEWALKS ON
ONE ACRE CUL-DE-SAC
MUNICIPALITY RESIDENTIAL LOTS? TURNAROUNDS? NOTES
Argyle No No No sidewalks required anywhere
Arlington No No Except on collector streets or
above
Carrollton Yes Yes Temporary sidewalks put in by
City on unplatted land near
schools
DeSoto Yes Yes
Fort Worth No No Except on collectors streets t
or above.
Hurst No No Unless within 1,500 feet of a
school
Lewisville Yes Yes Staff can require up to 61
wide sidewalks near schools
Keller Yes Yes
Mesquite Yes Yes ,
North Richland Yes Yes "covenant" required to
Hills guarantee future sidewalks on
unimproved streets
Plano Yes Yes Pedestrian easements near
schools may be required by
Planning and Zoning
Richardson Yes yes 4-foot is normal, 5-foot
required along collectcr
streets
D1nton County No No
Farmers Branch Yes Yes Can be waived by Council
Grapevine Yes Yes
3180k PAGE 9
APPENDIX
LITERATURE
TOE ZONING REPORT
Page Two
He pays the full cost of walkways in Plm+s
custer developments, All ordinances
l we sur- standards requiring required the developer to build and pay Perhaps only 2096' of of move these
sidewalks regulations
wisetthin it and forth
specified distance
fogr radi these wplaalnktiways, The developer
when ne constructs common areas-finished destrian-servi from schools and other pe_
ng be -
vided b uses. Sidewalks must of te
pth e
concrete work. ~Ofte n scilostsocsn be dnd street hens nodsdew lksoareone side
o
Payed until most houses one built or lots sold both sides required or on
of streets when one sidewalk is
within a cluster or grouped around a common, otherwise required
These standards van cons iderabl
communes, amon
Less sidewalks are re wired qw in rural subdivisiioons nt sidewalks re_
i n newer sub ivus ors schools "+subject to waiver within one mile to
sidewalks required within ones toe board"' to
Most subdivision ordinances (probably 70_80%) Sr $00-1000 feet of schools in urbthree an blocks
elks r s of all
streets, ben _
Nast communities Insist on sidewalk
requiBut nere ws sideswulks on both side side tend to sl0ng local and minor streets within at least
ewalks
quire sidewalks division
on one side d coca! one block from schools, two to
j streets, none at along collectors and a three blocks
sirg ir 3 or 2P fewer on s rt e`uTa'F-sacs sere- walkways across to R blocks blocks and cross-block
perimeter 0, h°l' nor eratmr} the cull walkl to short-cut ell
still require silol-d acs. wewer ordinances Pal to ssltoois~ walks on and collector streets withinothessubdivislonerw]
Sidewalks are nct re ulred in lar e-lot s Construction. standards
°m+• moat common break vi- Most sidewalks must
lots„n a subdivision are 1/2 to oone acre (u ual - g~dlY ~n re ~ four toot wide in sin-
e ly ore acre) or larger in size. CPC-staff subdi_ Y sub v s rm, ib b y two-thirds of
vision with the gulations require the 4-ft wtdth
plat review committees often waive rest requiring five-foot-wide slde-
sidewalks along local streets in large-lot sutdl- wheelchairs or bicycles widths allow two
visions designed under tot-averaging rules hav- a 30 Inch bcycles to carefully ing just a few lots smaller than the minimum, pathway for
eachl, is ma with tha sidewalks must be unobst
rueted bYstreetn funit
Sidewalks in hiiiside subdivislons must conform fire hydrants, contra posts, utillt
as closely as posy be to oca-f n'on.hillside stab Y poles and
division regulations, Sidewalks art negotiated visionso about ly projects and townhouse subdi-half with the CPC and staff to fit the
terrain, nanees' we su~,veyed quire four-foot streets:
These walks might be nairower than otherwise m of he rest fiv the subdlvisbn ordl-
required, integrated with curb and gutter it eq ire 8 -to s -It 'walks, feet
sidewalks ere otherwise separated from curbs wild maybe 10a;
by a planter strip, or required only on one side concrete e
k en oree r Inches thick and made of
of a street where otherwise sidewalks would be w rew a mesh In all subdivisioI'll n ocdirutrces We Sur-
required on both sides of streets, veyed. Sidewalk surfaces must be sate for
More sidewalks near schools and other odes- s andJes ersons, w care van to non-
tr an-servun uses are require in p suu aces a are brushed or striated but
base sub v s n regulations that do notr r - his corrugated or larger the 3/4 inch,
grooved. Grates on sidewalks
quire sidewalks on both sides of all streets, ably
prefer-
e no no gerithan 3/8 Inchnto reduce difficul-
May 21, 1988 Issue
i
PAGE: 10
✓ I t C
Fy',s } i a x ; } }r~ tJ
4 je r
fi J »rt r ; Y A S` , 1 1 rl r~[}
fly+y ! ( r 114,.'
F yt f
S . ~1►~4 t i 11Y .fit 7 ~f! r _ Y
l
Pt
4)`4 ~a .'{?,~~7{~Ty I~r~t~}4(~`'f;} f1 (SY '.Y .44$Y )~h~ f.i S},)F~`t'p 3{1M.a rli Fli Z.~ ? r
jr;.rri
r ' ~Sa~Y+t~i 1' f4
1{i 1W
f
_ rinciples
• •
• •
Dubltshoo .
. .
A
`3
r _
~a
i
1
44 Modern winter automobile ;fires have proved effective Pedestrian Circulation
under snow and ice conditions for negotiating up to
glx inches of snow even on surprisingly steep grades. In general, the complete soparalion of vehicular
the individual driving under winter conditions has a from pedestrian circulation syslorns is desirable. To
moral, it not legal, responsibility to his neighbors to achieve such separation, a developmenl's pedestrian
assure that his vehicle is properly shod. Community system may contain three different types of sidewalks
responsibility is to assure emergency routes, arterial or paths,
sfreefs, and collector strodts, in [flat order, are Paths or sidewalks, usualfy two-three feet wide,
opened to travel quickly. Snow removal on residential connecting individual dwelling units with ofl-street
streets necessarily is given lower priority. parking, parking Bads, parking lots, parking bays,
Local maintenance aulhorilies, from the slandpoinl at and refuse disposal areas;
cost and ellecliveness. may wish to consider the , Local palhs or sidewalks, usually three-fear feet
advantages of a policy of not plowing residential wide, connecting neighboring dwelling units;
streets when (I) snowfall is less than live-six inches;
(2) there is no drilling; and (3) additional snow is not Paths connecting groups of dwellings with cam- N c
l immediately forecast. Under these conditions, snow mercial centers and ether community facilities. r~
windrowed by plowing may unnecessarily cause Width selection is dependent upon pedestrian and w
extra shoveling to extricate cars parked along [he bicycle traffic requirements. 4
street or on adjacent dnvoways, and Ilia windrowed a
snow may still be a focal nuisance alter almost all
other snow has melted. Savings of furl, equipment,
and labor-often incurred is a result of overtime
maintenance work--can accrue train nonplowing
policies and public inconvor lance may even be 14 Om
reduced.
Snow and ice control by applicafion of vnrtous salts.
even salts inixed with rust inhibitors, should be care- •
fully evaluated. Average salino damage to vehicles t`
may exceed $100 per vehicle per year. Salts also
cause or induce extensive damage to porous rna-
foriafs, especially Portland cement concrete bridges,
i cufvcds, walks, and curbs. Environm onfalisis con- Pedesulan end hicyc o nails
r corned with downstream water quality will provide
additional reasons for avoiding deicing salts. Wo of
abrasives seems preferable.
i
}
Sidewalks and pall's should not be used for drain Skfewalks within a street nghl-of-way normally 45
age. Only small amounts of surlace drainequ should should be lour -feet wide. Sidewalks within the rights-
[low across walks or palls. A minimum trdnsvefse--- of-way of short cul-de-sacs or courts may produce
cross-slope of one-eighlb inch per foot---toward the mufficienl benefif to justify the cost. The added edge
street when the walk is within a sheet right-o[-way, is rnainlenanco of such sidewalks entails may make
essential to provide walk surface drainage. Tho lhem a groater liability than asset.
transverse slope should not exceed Ihree-eighths Common area palls or walks generally should be
inch por fool because greater slopos are hazardous
under icy condilions and at night. wide enough to provide either Iwo pedestrian lanes or
one, pedestrian and one bicycle lane. A four-fool
Pedestrian paths in well drained soils may serve width is tight for passing bicycles, although gen-
salislacloNly wilhout any special surfacing. Where efally adequale; a lour and one-hall fool width is
soils are soli or sticky when wet, pathway soils much more comfortable and a five-foot width borders
should be stabilized, surfaced or paved, as tit)- on luxury. The above widths assume no side obstruc-
propriale for the amount and character of their po- lions or walls.
Ienlial usage. An occasionally used footpath may 1
serve adequnlely wilhout improvement or with A path exclusively for bicycles need not be more
graveling I leavy pedestrian usage or bicycle traffic than !hreo and one-half feel wide and would be
usually requbes a hard surface. If should be recog- accoplable for all but the major elements of a bicycle
nixed that the paved surface added to an average path system. The major elements of a two-lano I
subdivision for sidewalks and paths can increase the bicycle path should be approximately five feet wide. Q' 1
mpervious cover by as much as 3 porcenl in the
subdivision.
Walks and Paths ~r`3 t M !
Sidewalks along sonic residenlial slreots are neces- v V~
safy and desirable. The basic lest of need should be j~
expected use and sidewalk relationship as an ele- v
K
meal of a functional pedestrian system. Realistic
evaluation ollen will reveal sidewalks on one or boll
sides of a rninof residential drool will be super-
Iluous. When children are anticipated and paved
private driveways will not be installed, sidewalks
should be installed on at least one side of the ,treol.
Public palls or sidewalks always should be located
within a public righi-of-way, a public easement, or a
common area.
Gaud daagn Is safe and vlsibru
li
3
S
,a
F.
t
COMMENDED
RE
ES
FOR
SUBDIWSION AUG 1B IW
STREETS PLANNING
DEPARTNIE T
A Recommended NE p{he
Institute of Transportation
i
t ■ ~
525 School Street SW, Suite 410, WaahlnQton, D.C. 20024 (202) 51.6080
PAGE 14
I
i
VPF
1 -
k
ELEMENTS FOR SUBDIVISION STREETS 7
2.w.05. Type of Curb, case of standard vertical curbs, with or county, and proximity of bicycle.
As may be expected, a wide divergence without gutter widths of normal slope, oriented generators such as educational
of opinion exists with respect to curb the distance is measured fare-(o-('ace of institutions or parks. See source refer-
design The advantages of vertical curb curb. In the case of large V-gutters or ence No. 1 for design dimensions.
are: high slope gutters, the width must be There have been a number of initia-
a. Pedestrians, street trees, utilities, measured across only the pavement area lives to provide accessibility for the f
and signs are best protected by the within which the average driver oper- handicapped through provisions such as
vertical curb. ates. sidewalk ramps. There is currently no
b. A positive limit of vehicle en- The complete elimination of curbs consensus on when or where to include
croachment on the border area is poses a number of disadvantages as foi- such provisions, or on the best design
established. This minimizes lows: Specifications. Until some consensus is
parkway erosion and also reduces a. No protection is given to pedes- reached, decisions on whether or not to
probability of vehicles sliding off trians, street trees, and utilities. include such provisions and the spe-
the roadway under unfavorable b. Border area erosion is prevalent. cifies of design should consider local
pavement and weather conditions. c, The roadway is poorly defined at regulations and/or practice, and the
r c. Depression of curb is required at night under rainy weather when number of persons benefited vs. those
f driveways. Such depression is de• asphalt surfacing is used, adversely affected (Le„ wheelchairs vs,
sirable for clear identification of d. Positive control of drainage is to. blind, handicappedvs, nonhandicapped,
driveway, which minimizes block- tally tacking. Open ditch-type ad• etc.)
age by curb parkers. )scent drainage facilities are cua-
d. Excellent drainage control may be tomarily employed, which leaves
maintained by either variable the subdivision with a rural ap. 2.03.07, Sidewalk Dislancefrom i
height or standard height curb. pearance. 01rb Face. (See Figure 2.)
e. Provides improved control of po- e. Where asphalt surface is used, Many agencies specify a standard lo- e
tentlal parked runaway vehicles. Pavement edge raveling poses a cation for sidewalk I foot (0.3 m), from
Advanta es of the roll- maintenance problem, right-of-way line. This location has the
g es curb are: following advantages where proper
a, it Is slightly less expensive than - right-of-way width and attendant border
the vertical type. P .03,06, sidewalks and Bicycle area of 5400t (1.5•m) minimum remain
b. Same persons feel that the roll- between the street edge of sidewalk and
type Is the more aesthetically In today's typical subdivision, curb face:
pleasing. sidewalks have the following function: a. Children walking and playing side
c. Cheap driveway construction can a. Providing for maximum safety of
be employed without curb depres• children playing on their block, by side have increased safety from
sion. This a"ows the subdivider b. Protection of children walking to street traffic,
and developer certain flexibllltles w d from schools and neighbor- b, Conflict between the pedestrians r
in their constructions, in that hood parks. and garbage ortrash cans awaiting
driveway locations are not re• c. Prodslon for adults to walk to and pickup at the curb is eliminated by
quired to be determined prior to from neighborhood shopping and using the border area for such
curb installation, transit stops (if any), temporary storage.
A discussion of curb types would not Sidewalks should ordinarily be C. The warped area necessary for a
be complete without consideration of provided along streets used for pedes• proper driveway gradient is
gutter design. Some municipalities use trfan access to schools, parks, shopping minlfthis by having l mayor the
a separate vertical curb. Others employ areas, and transit stops. Paved sidewalks torn border this gradient tall within the
a 12- to 18-inch-wide (30- to 46-cm) should also be provided within pedes• border area,
gutter, poured integrally with the curb trianways giving midbloek access to d. Danger hicle of collision ze runolplace-
ing. Still others employ large V•type these types of enerat vehicles Is minimized b ace
g ors. Wider by p
gutter designs, or wide apron, high- sidewalks may be considered next to meat of the walk at maximum
slope gutters of 3 or4 feet (1 to 1.2 m) in higher density pedestrian generators, practical distance from the curb,
width, This variation In design policy is such as schools, transit stops, and andwithfurther separation bytree
an Important consideration in specify- churches, plantings.
ing street width, In Reference Number In the very low-density subdivisions,~1. e• Conflict with storage of snow
2.03.04 (Table 1), the term "Pavement walking distance to regular elementary plowed off the roadway is
Width" Is Intended to be a practical driv- schools is often excessive, In cam- minimized,
Ing width available between faces of munflJes where ail such travel is by way f. Pedestrians are less likely to be
abutting curbs. In the case of the roll. of school buses, there will be less need "splashed" by passing vehicles,
type curb, In 12- to 18-Inch (30• to for sidewalk construction as a standard When rigi : of-way restrictions result
46-cm) gutter design, this distance Is policy. In a sidewalk next to the curb, an addi•
measured between points approxi. The need for bicycle paths Is a func- tional width of 1 to 2 feet (03 to 0.6 m)
mately halfway up the roll curb, in the tion of subdivision density, area of the is desirable.
PAGE 15
4
i
.a
Y
P&Z Minutes
April 10, 1991
Page 4
Mr, Robbins answered that there is some potential just as
there is with planned developments,
Ms. Brock asked for examples of conditions that might be
imposed,
Mr. Robbins said that trees coy! be protected, additional
setbacks could be imposed, screening could be required,
placements of buildings could be regulated. A pharmacy
could be allowed in an office complex with conditions on
floor area and maximum square footage. Undesirable uses can
be eliminated or conditioned. Conditional use zoning cannot
add land uses but it can eliminate them.
Mr. Appleton asked if the City would be obligated to give
the same type of conditional zoning on a tract next to one
that was conditionally zoned,
Mr. Robbins said it would be the same thing as with Planned
Developments. If the city approves of one it does not
necessitate doing the same thing next door. It could be j
challenged. A lot depends on the individual tracts of
land, With the Owens Restaurant case there was an
inFinitesimal lin(i but there was a difference between their
site and the adjacent one,
Mr, Appleton asked why the city would want to determine a
businesses hours of operation,
Mr. Robbins said it cr,uld be a nuisance factor,
Mr, Appleton asked why they should be regulated if a
business can operate and not create a problem,
Mr. Robbins said that the Commission could choose not to use
the option of regulating hours.
Ms, Brock noted that the list in the back up is examples.
They are not conditions that have to be used and the city is
not limited to only the examples, She moved to approve
amendment of the Zoning Ordinance by adding nrovisions for
conditioned use zoning. Motion was secondou by Ms, Morgan.
Mr. Apppleton asked if the only property being conditioned
would be the tract of land up for zoning or rezoning,
Mr. Robbins said yes.
Motion carried unanimously (6-0),
V. Hold a public hearing and consider an ordinance amending
Article 4,04 of the Subdivision Rogulations regarding
sidewalks.
Page 16
'V1
is
t
l
f&Z Minutes
April lo, 1991
Page 5 .
Staff Report: Mr, Yost stated that staff recommends not
requiring sidewalks:
1. within one acre or larger lotted single-family
subdivision;
2, abutting cul-de-sac tur4iarounds; and
3, within single family replat subdivisions, if the
previous plat did not require sidewalks.
Staff has been considering a provision to require developers
to build 6 foot wide sidewalks along arterial and collector
streets within 900 feet of a school. After some
consideration of the positive value of this standard, it is
not being recommended.
Ms. Morgan asked if not requiring sidewalks in a replat
would result in a left out tract when others around it had
sidewalks.
Mr. Yost said that it could happen but it is more likely
that the whole subdivision would have been platted without
sidewalks, If three of the lots are being replatted into
two lots and a sidewalk was not required for the three lots
originally, then why should it be required for the replat.
Ms, Morgan noted that this is a move away from the city's
sidewalk requirements,
Mr. Yost stated that sidewalks will still be required In 991
of all cases and in all new development.
Mr. !lolt asked the reasoning behind the recommendation for
large lots,
Mr. Yost stated that a one acre lot or larger still houses
only one family. There is not an increased need for
sidewalks and the cost is substantial. The rationale for
cul-do-sacs is that there is no through traffic on
cul-de-sacs and people are more likely to walk directly
across the street than around the curve.
Mr. Kamman asked if people use sidewalks in light industrial
areas,
Ms. Rock said yes.
Mr, Yost said that when retail is next to light industrial
it generates traffic.
Page 17
..S
is
P$Z Minutes
April 10, 1991
Page 6
Nis, Brock commented that when developing a large lot, a
sidewalk is just a small part of the expense,
Mr, Robbins said that one acre lots are more likely to be on
the periphery of town or out in the country.
Mr, Appleton asked if the idea to not require sidewalks on
the large lots came from ~~taff or from developers.
Mr, Yost stated that all a recommendations are recurring
requests.
Mr. Holt asked if all the lots in the subdivision would have
to be larger than one lot.
Mr. Yost stated that the requirement would apply only when `
one lot was platted,
i Mr. Morris stated that the ordinance is written that all the
lots would have to be larger than one acre.
,
The Commission discussed the recommendations,
Ms, Brock said that the recommendation seems to say that
those with less money and smaller lots must build sidewalks
while larger more expensive lots owned by people with more
money would not have that expense, She would like to be
consistent by having sidewalks all around the cul-de-sacs as
well.
Mr. Holt moved to not require sidewalks within single family
replat subdivisions, if the previous plat did not require
sidewalks, Motion was seconded by Ms, Brock.
Mr. Glasscock moved to amend the motion to add that
sidewalks not be required abutting cul-de-sac turnarounds,
Amendment was seconded by Ms,,Morgan,
Mr, Kamman questioned the rationale that the sidewalk would
not be used in the cul-de-sac.
Mr. Yost answered that most people prefer to use the street
itself. A case example is Bellaire Heights, They have a
sidewalk 10 feet long and there is no other around it, Only
the turnaround is proposed to be exempted from the
requirement, sidewalks would still be required on the long
part of the cul-de-sac. Also, most lots on a cul-de-sac
have very narrow frontage.
Mr. Morris asked if a child wanted to visit a friend on the
other side o£ a cul-de-sac would it have to cross the street,
Page 18
dq.,
i3
1
t r~i
fi
PF,Z MNLIOs
April 10, 1991 ti
Page 7
Mr. Yost said yes. /
Mr. Kamman asked if there is a liability for that situation.
Mr, Morris said no.
Vote on the amendment failed due to a tie vote (3.3),
L Vote on original motion carried unanimously (6-0),
VI. Director's Report,
Mr, Robbins stated that a copy of a resolution by the Parks
Board has been provided for the Commission's information.
He reviewed the list of upcoming cases with the Commission,
Ms. Morgan asked how the bond money could be released to
comply with the resolution by the Parks Board, She
understood that once it was approved for a specific use by
the voters it could not be used for anything else,
Mr. Robbins said that she was correct. There will have to
be a referendum to reallocate the money. There is just no
foreseeable revenue to operate new facilities,
Mr. Kamman asked the status of Albertsons.
Mr. Robbins replied that the developer's loan fell through
and they have not secured other financing. Albortsons may _ I
choose to become the developer.
Mr. Kamman asked the status of the zoning case on Bonnie
Brae,
Mr, Robbins said that the City Council approved office
zoning and directed staff to prepare an accessory use
ordinance.
Meeting adjourned at 6:17 p.m,
Page 19
i
i~
A
DATE; 05/21/91
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM; Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: CONDITIONED ZONING DISTRICT
RECOMMENDATION;
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval 6--0,
SUMMARY:
1. Conditioned rezoning attaches special or more strict
conditions which are not spelled out in th.+ 'straight 1
zoning" district standards to an ordinance zoning or
rezoning land.
2. The standards or conditions may not be less strict than
those in the zoning district being conditioned.
3. Uses which are shown as permitted for a "straight zoning
district" may be disallowed with a conditioned rezoning.
4. Matters for which a rezoning may be conditioned in order to r
mitigate negative impacts and insure compatibility are
listed.
5. This technique will probably become a common practice due
to the flexibility it offers the regulatory process.
BACKGROUNDi
i
i
j
September 12, 1990; P&Z discusses concept in work session and
directs staff to proceed with drafting the
ordinance.
January 17 and zoning Ordinance Task Force discusses
February 7, 19911 concept.
February 21, 1991; zoning ordinance Task Force endorses
o rdl Hance.
{
April 10, 1991 P&Z recommends approval of the ordinance,
1-
r
4i
Mayor and City Council
may 21, 1991
Page 2
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
FISCAL IMPACT:
Respectf submitte
Pre red b : r Ll yd Harrell
City Manager
k
ank H. o b ns
Executive Director
Planning and Development
2605x/3
f
i
(E k
i i
1
i
i
1
E
i
INEE,
1 '
1
qvx
i7
ORDINANCE NO,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING APPENDIX - B
ZONING OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ADDING A NEW ARTICLE 10A TO
PROVIDE FOR CONDITIONED ZONING; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLA.
TIONS OF CONDITIONS OR RESTRICTIONS IMPOSED; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I, That Appendix B--Zoning of the Code of Ordinances is
amended by adding a new Article 10A to read as follows:
i
ARTICLE 10A. CONDITIONED ZONING DZSTRICT
A. Purpose. This article allows the city Council to im-
pose conditions and restrictions on the use of land and
buildings when approving a change in zoning district class-
ification when necessary to mitigate adverse impacts or
incompatibilities of land uses which might otherwise result
at a specific site,
D. General Provisions.
tI
under this article condition
be considered or use restriction established
regulations of the district and shall be incorporated in
the ordinance providing for the change in zoning.
2. The procedures applicable to a request for a change
in zoning district classification, including notice, public
hoarings and written protests, shall apply to any modifica-
tion of any condition or restriction imposed under this
article,
3. This article does not authorize a land use which is
not a permitted use in a zoning district and no requirement
J of any ordinance shall be waived or made less strict
through the application o
prohibit a land use otherwiseig article, The Council may
dis-
trict if necessary to insure the compatibility of land
uses.
4, The Department, commission, or council may,require
s,
es,3 dapplica to rawings written istatments, impact oanalyses~ or sketch-
information if determined necessary to review, make a rec-
ommendation, or decision on the application.
Page 3
f
~JJ
c, conditions and Restrictions. In order to safeguard the
public safety and welfare of the citizens and to protect
properties from adverse impacts and incompatibilities, the
planning and zoning commission may recommend and the City
council may impose conditions and restrictions on the property
being rezoned, including, but not be limited to, one or more of
the following matters:
1. Setbacks for buildings ur structures.
2. Public street access.
3. Drainage.
4. Vehicular traffic, circulation, parking lots or
spaces. t'
5. Screening or buffers.
6. Hours of operation.
7. Activities permitted on the property.
8. Building or structure heights.
9. Landscaping.
10. Impervious surface area,
11. Floor area ratio.
12. Pedestrian circulation,
13. signs.
14. mitigation of noise, fumes, odors, vibration, or
airborne particles.
15. Exterior lighting. ,
Iz 16. Building facades and exterior construction materials.
17. Special fire protection measures.
18, outside storage and display of merchandise.
19. Refuse and waste storage.
20. other conditions or restrictions as shown on a site
plan.
D. Zoning District Map. Any property approved for a
change of zoning district classification with conditions or
restrictions as authorized by this article shall be shown
on the zoning district map with the abbreviated designation
of the district followed by (c), to show the property as a
conditioned zoning district.
SECTION L1. It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any
condition or restriction imposed upon the use of any land under the
provisions of this ordinance and any person found to be in viola-
tion thereof shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding
$2,000. Each day that a violation occurs shall constitute a sepa-
rate and distinct offense.
SECT70N III, That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sen-
tence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application
s thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court
of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the valid-
ity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City
Page 4
WF low"
E
w
1
1
Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby declares it would have
enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity.
SECTION TV, That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen
.(14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is
hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be pub-
lished twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle the official newspaper
of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (i0) days of the date o
its passage, of
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
1991,
~.w
1
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR 1
ATTEST;
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
~ I
BY;
k
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
l
j
j ,
1
i
Page 5
E
PP,Z Minutes
April 10, 1991
Page 3
Mr. Appleton arrived at thu meeting.
Mr. Appleton asked how the City insures that the trees will
be protected.
Mr. Yost replied that the Building Inspector will inspect
the sidewalk. The current regulations say that there can be
no paving nor can a building extend into the drip line of
protected trees. That is checked on the building plans.
Bud Hauptmann of Metroplex engineering stated that he and
the pastor of the church were available to answer questions,
Mr Appleton asked if they had heard from any of the
neighbors,
G
Mr. Hauptmann replied that they had heard nothing adverse at
all. Their development will be a definite improvement to
the property. It is located less than one-half block from
the Martin Luther King Center. There has been no opposition
to their plans.
Mr. Kamman moved to recommend approval of the preliminory
and final replats of the Kings Forest Addition from Lots 2
through 7 into Lot 2R, Block A. Motion was seconded by Mr.
Appleton and unanimously carried (6-0).
IV, Hold a public hearing and consider an ordinance amending the f
Zoning Ordinance by adding provisions for Conditioned Use
Zoning.
Mr, Robbins stated that conditioned uses are a simple
concept. Conditions can be placed on a straight zoning or
rezoning, Several examples of conditions are listed in the
proposed ordinance. Standards could be set in place and
uses could be limited, The problem where straight zoning
would be okay except for certain uses that are allowed in
that type of district would be solved. The Zoning Task
Force has recommonded approval of conditioned use zoning.
Mr. Kamman asked if there would be an obligation to do the
same thing on a tract adjacent to one that had conditional
zoning.
Mr. Robbins replied that the conditions would apply only to
the district being zoned,
Mr, Kamman asked if there would be problems with
discrimination. Could the City be more strict on some than
on others.
Page 6
s~
}
PF,Z Minutes
April 10, 1991
Page 4
Mr. Robbins answered that there is some potential just as
there is with planned developments.
Ms. Brock asked for examples of conditions that might be
imposed.
Mr, Robbins said that trees could be protected, additional
setbacks could be imposed, screening could be required,
placements of buildings could be regulated. A pharmacy
could be allowed in an office complex with conditions on
floor area and maximum square footage. Undesirable uses can
be eliminated or conditioned, Conditional use zoning cannot
add land uses but it can eliminate them.
Mr, Appleton asked if the City would be obligated to give
the same type of conditional zoning on a tract next to one
that was conditionally zoned,
Mr. Robbins said it would be the same thing as with Planned C.
Developments. If the city approves of one it does not
necessitate doing the same thing next door. It could be a
challenged. A lot depends on the individual tracts of
land, With the Owens Restaurant case there was an
infinitesimal line but there was a difference between their
site and the adjacent one,
Mr. Appleton asked why the city would want to determine a
businesses hours of operation.
Mr, Robbins said it could be a nuisanco factor,
Mr. Appleton asked why they should be regulated if a
business can operate and not create a problem,
Mr. Robbins said that the Commission could choose not to use
the option of regulating hours,
Ms. Brock noted that the list in the back up is examples.
They are not conditions that have to be used and the city is
not limited to only the examples, She moved to approve
amendment of the zoning Ordinance by adding provisions for
conditioned use zoning, Motion was seconded by Ms, Morgan,
I
1 Mr, Apppleton asked if the only property being conditioned
would be the tract of land up for zoning or rezoning,
Mr, Robbins said yes.
Motion carried unanimously (6-0).
FVHold a public hearing and consider an ordinance amending
Article 4,04 of the Subdivision Regulations regarding
sidewalks.
Page 7
4
F
r
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of a tax refund to Cedar Ridge Properties Inc,
RECOMMENDATION:
The Tax Department has mailed an Overpayment better and an Application
for Refund to the taxpayer. All completed forms and necessary documenta-
tion have been returned, requesting this refund, which the Tax Technician
recommends,
SUMMARY:
Chapter 31.11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of
the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $ 500.00.
Cedar Ridge Properties .Inc, has requested a refund in the amount of
$ 3 012,69 because they paid in error on Account # 128452.
BACKGROUND:
Taxes were paid by the restaurant manager and by Cedar Ridge Properties, c
each paying $ 3,022,69. Since the restaurant manager is responsible for
paying these taxes, Cedar Ridge Properties is requesting a refund of their
\ overpayment,
1 PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
j The Tax Department and the tax account of Cedar Ridge Properties Inc.
i
FISCAL IMPACT:
$ 3,012.69
RESP TFULLY SSW ITTED:
Li y larreli
city Manager
Prepared by:
arv me Vic Schneider
Title Tax Technician
Approved:
Name arl erson
5 Title Tre er
2633C/3
I
,..4
i'
.S la
site Pf p0IIcsn epid
A~ APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND
ndAPNkatle 21.11(4112) Collecting Office Name,
Collecting Tax For
O F/ cwj -
/S axing n
Address its)
7 _
Clry, State, ZIP Code _
in order to apply for a tax refund, the following information must be provided by the tnxpayer.~- _ _ -
IIENTIFICATION OF PROPE
Name: TY OWNER
Address: C
Telephone Number (I} additionei Information is no' edy '
IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: /
Description of Pro
~ n Cpi/7~C•
Address or Location of Props S r G
Account Number of Property,,
or Tax Receipt Number:
INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES;
Name of Taxing Unit Year for
From Which Refund Which Refund Amount of
Is Requested Is Requested Date of the Amount of
Tax Payment Taxes Paid Tax Refund
1. 01/ Q' 18 f- Rsque1 sted `
fi
Taxpayer's reason for refund (attach supporting documentation): r~c>s . c_
herd
eb apply for the refund of the abovedescrlbed taxes and certify that the In ornI I have
-
is true d correo ' given on this form
r
Signature a L
y N~ 1 C/r)/r ' JJ ~7
flats of Applicatlon for Tax Refund
'r lrw4`w
DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND:
Approval Disapproval
Slgnature of Authorized Officer
Date
Signa~ of Prey Id1 ng Officer(s) of Taxing
Unit(s) for refund applications over $500 Date w
Anyporsonwho makes rigloo entry upon the forsgangrecord shall be aub)eettooneofthafoflowingpenafdea; 1, Impriwmentol
not more than to years nor Iw than 2 years and/or a one of not more than $5,000 or both such 8M and
forth In Section 3r.101C, panel Coda,
I WUNO 3111 2 confinement In Jalffor a term up to 1 yearwaonsnotto prf nNntgalN
forth tpan exceed f2,000 or both such Mne and im son
r -
?t
1
CEDAR RIDGE PROPERTIES, INC.
SOUTHAf Er VN LAGE 0118
770 PARK AVENUE
NEW YORK, N.Y 1OW
t { t ) a i ~
b4im ; ~ r ~ •r ' .l ~I~J~a~J~-`C~r ~ ~.L ~ ~ ~-'711"
bft 121 TY Chi' bhN'"
rrf 9, Z 6.
n~rwMrr "w`M+~eran ~ ' ; - ~
~11~I M Y.IYM >
~'OOQiiB~ ~:I?~1DC1tl~tl~~t0~~i tl 237~4M -;,~t30gY~5q~gSk:~'
_J
4~f
ww4
4!
{{I
s¢
=1
. 1 p t
AN oft AN
ZZ ,T6,
yr
r~
wrrio
teI)PO#4ri J
_.J
I
i I
F?
_ FAd /
REPORT Fl OR 05 UW OG/01/91 AT 18157 d V L H PA -Y N E N -T
ACCOUNT NU. RECEIPT NO. NAMC ADDRESS AMOUNT STATUS OF PAYMENT
28342000000 90/04/OFT-0690 WULSKI, LDWARD P GUADALOOL PL - 4.30 OVERPAY -
28596000000 90/04100-0710 UAPROW, J. H. JR SAN GAURIEL UR 30400 :GVERPAY
29017000000 90/04/00-0736 KLEMMER, ROBERT J DEL DR 20.00 GVERPAY
Z9.773Q10QOV. 90/04/00-0622 TtMS, -JUSCfli L_.JR.._ b_ _-r- LTO ,Y ST
3266400 000 90/04/08-1016 FIRST STATE BANK UF-€NTIiN F 170 9T 419•
28!.63 OVERPAY
326640188$0 90/04/00-1017 FIRST STATE BANK CF DENTON FULTON Sr
332740 0 90/04/08-1035 FIRST STATE BANK OF DENTON BOLIVER ST 63495 OVERPAY
33274000000 90/04/08-1037 FIRST STATE BANK CF UENTUN 80LIVERST 150419 OVERPAY
31195000000 90!04/09-0076 BILL, JACK C G'18€NWUd'D 04 328.66 OVERPAY
.11312000000 70/04/10-0027 DAVIS, Hr RT E XAYEWOCD DR 1.00 OVERPAY
12099800000 90/01/14-0245 SNIDER. SHARLA L DR1TTAhY OR 371.09 GVERPAY
20913000000 90/04/14-0380 WALTEHSCHEtO, STEPHEN J ULRNANO ST 2#00 OVERPAY
1512900¢050 90/04/13-0094 CLARKt RUSSELL 0 Lit _....._ROLLINO HILLS"_. '1443-OVERP7fY----____
1310810 000 90/04/18-0136 R-P PROPERTIES, INC OOUBLEOAK Cl 156.25 OVERPAY
39304000000 90/04/30-0012 FARMERS G MERCHANTS STATE BANK VIRGINIA ST 883.54 OVERPAY
29126000000 90/04/31-0305 STEM, DANIEL 0 MANHATTAN 04 17.6 GVERPAY__
23005000060 90,'04/31-0'346 OROWH, JIMMY 6 _ PANHANOLE ST 653.1"CVERPAV
26450000000 90/05/04-0509 JUDY, MAX C 2L-23 N LOCUST 9.00 OVERPAY
269920000000 90/05/05-OIOBO HARPUCL UAK PROPERTY E MCXINNEY ST 8.95 OVERPAY
36771000000 001567,?-0296 FULLCR.~ SLHP_2ae (DENTDNI LTD FISHTRAP 40 482,49._VVEAP7AV`-'
0204200000 90/05/06 0055 SIMS, KENITH 0 WILLOW STONE S 279.62 OVERPAY -
~0431900000 90/05/06-6056 LEWIS MIKE CONST INC CHAPEL OR 936.0) OVERPAY
2236 000000 90/05/06-0139 CREIGHTUN, JO ANN IMPERIAL OR 434437 OVERPAY
L020 600009 •53705/07-061L JAMES, JdN € PL.UN HOLLOW ST 5522_g4_.._p9Q3 GVERPAY'
n~27.5.Qg0-0.00_4DL0>lflI- 3,012z~ CVEqPAl
' 128452 000 70/03/07-OJ77 C OAR RfU GE PROP !NC
14 E UNiVER9IYY 6 281-.69-t~ VERPA'I
55 000000 90!05/07=0630---.P JKS Ni_.
2306000000 90/05/11-0165 WILLIAMS, J13HNNY U EGANRSTUN 34,00 UVf RPAY - ,
17657700000 70/05/1.1-U426 00CLEULS., CHARLESAG DAVID L .FEARS TREEMPLR - I,424.12 CVERPAV- -
1 MLKINSEY 068 63.14 GVERPAY
13715400000 90/05/1)-0432 ESTEP. STEVE F" _ 245.07 CVERPAV _
275070OP000 90/05720-0002.,.' JEFFERSON, J.-H...'... T --_".173:51_-.OVERPAY
13662800000 90/05122-0022 DCTY. MICHAEL E MCKINNEY ST 1.69 OVERPAY 1
23472000000 90/05/28-0072 WALKER, TERRY A. SANTIAGO PL 06.20 OVERPAY
31479000O%O 90/05/28-0080 WARD. EDWAND _SNYDER ST -.-.5.05 OVERPAY 1
25936000080 90/0'3/28-0209 OLtCKL NANCY L. E £OWIN L: ""CORNELL LN 2.00 OVERPAY'
i 23249000000 90/05/28-0262 RUMPF, WN A. MUNTIhGTON DR 456.33 OVERPAY
17598000000 90/06/04-0039 HUVIETIMC E MCKIhNEY ST 0.07 OVERPAY
I 14156800000 90/06/05-000J SPACE MASTER INTL WINDSOR 5T 0.04 OVERPAY -
01468000000 98/66/05=0026 NEXT DOOR _---SUM3Er"ST - o ioI-CVERPAV-- - - A
26545000000 90/06/07-0001 OREARLEY, DONALD E GEORGETOWN OR 9.00 CVERPAV
23689000000 90/06/11-0007 TUTT, GENE WESTWAV ST 9.64 OVERPAY
1254308a0000 VO/06/11-0015 WE85TERr MICHELLE 43 603 OVERPAY _
50662i 8000u 70/06/11-0021 ELLIsCNr C 0435-CVERPAY"
' 34460000000 90/06/12-0001 SAURI, REZA OOLIVER ST 0.09 GVERPAY
300060000tlU 90/06/13-0002 SPURFILGR, LYLE W TERRA OR 142.51 OVERPAY
13546940000 90/06/19-QOJ4 _RANDALL,.MARY .J.O. 0,75GVERPAY_______- '
I
I i
i j
1
i
r
I'
L IN I
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of a tax refund to Beneficial. Standard Lifo Ins, Co, '
RECOMMENDATION:
Beneficial Standard Life Ins. Co. has shown proof of payment and the
Tax Technician recommends a refund.
SUMMARY:
Chapter 31.11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of
the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $ 500,00,
Beneficial Standard Life Ins. Co, has requested a refund in the amount of
$ 961,37 because they paid in error on Account # 394570.
BACKGROUND:
'fin -~-91, Beneficial Standard Life Ins. Co, erroneously made a payment
;
of $ 961,37 on the account of Jack M. Hall, which is not one of the prop-
erties they're responsible for. They are now requesting a refund of their
payment,
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
The Tax Department and the tax account of Jack M. Hall
FISCAL IMPACT:
$ 961,37
RESP' TFULLY S BMITTED.
1 y arrel I
City Manager
Prepared by:
/J
aA me - Vic Schneid'
Title Tax Technician
Approved:
me Har e erson
Title Tr 4er
2633C13
k
1 •
4d
i
I'.
F
suit progeny ram sovd
Round Appkal" 31,11(442) APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND
r l n /
Collecting Office Name; /7/-uv 0 V d/Pil
Collecting Tax For. T
D
,y1 ax n n to
Addrasa ~ =-c~ l h f? C' S~~ 7d 2
Cfty, State, Zip code
in order to apply for a tax refund, the following information must be provided by the taxpayer,
IDENTIFICATION OF PROPZRTy OWNER,
Name,
Address:
Teiephone Number (if additional Information is needed);
IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY. 6U
Description of Property;
L f /3 S
Address Or Location of Property;
Account Number of Properly: e r
INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES; or Tax Receipt Number,
Name of Taxing Unit Year for I
From Which Refund Which Refund 1
Is Request )d Is Requested Date of the Amount of Amount of
Tax Payment Taxes Paid Tax Refund
19 t• e n Requested
$
Taxpayer's reason for rr Ind (attach supporting documentation: Mc /
)
F Prl e d J f~~CY r7r ~ ~ I ^t~- ~ /
4 0 rc r o!
"I hereby app y for the refund of the ab
+~s
tru nd correct," ove described tutee and certify that the Information have given on this f
Orm
Signature tr 7c,
_teofA
Application for Tax
Aelund
DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND;
-------.Approval Disapproval
Signature of AuthOrIzod Officer -
Date
Signature of Presiding OMlcer(s) of Taxing
Unlt(s) for refund applications over $500 Oats
Any person who mA" a tai" entry upon the for ofn record shelf be subjett on* of the not more than 10 years not fees than 2eyears and/or a one of tot more
thin w
imprisonment; 2, confinement in lag for a form up to 1 year or a one not to exceed 12,000 or both such ee and Imprisonment u set
forth In Section 27,10, Penal Code, $8100 or boo such one and
AEfUNO J111
{ . 419
S I
1
\\V
CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK
A haa.5,,vi.,+la~
April 3, 1991
City of Denton Tax Office
21S E, McKinney Street
Denton, Texas 76201
Ra 199o Tax Aceoaat 3945-761-ooo0
Dear Sir or Madam:'
Enclosed please find
Insurance P
. a copy of the referenced tax statement and the
n error. a y check #04-651 141
IN the uroa Beneficial Stag
at of l
Standard i error. The above account does ■ot a pply to any of our properties. Standard Life
pa id by &aeflciai
Please expedite a refund to Beneficial Stan
and seod to my attentloa at the fOlYogla
E~ZaddreLp, ife Iasuraace Company to the amount of
$961,37 i
Mrs. Frances Schlavl
California Federal Bank
2400 E. Commercial Boulevard
Ft. Lauderdale<,r• a3308 7 /L~ 4) A
Thank you for your assistance in clearing n ( 1
Issue, piease contact me at 1-600-225-3331 this ask for for ext. If you have ao matl#ro
9400. Y questions regarding this
~Ve truly Yours,
Frances Schiari
Commercial REO Coordinator
ccrkwdtax
Enclosures
California Federal lower 2400 E. Commercial Boulfornia R0. ral Bank, F9B
Box 407090 F1. Lauderdale, FL 33340.7080 (305) 493.9300
rj
fr
1
r ir \r
I
BENEFICIAL 57ANQ4Rp
LIFE IN LIRAS NCE MCO PAN'
01OW! 04- 651141
AMOflY.,
TO The ,a ~~ITY OF DENTON TAX OFFICE '
15 E, MCKINNEY STREET
DENTON TX 76201 D. 01/18/91
AV*Ayr6 W EACE 6R OF $tj).o 0 RFQMFW TMA 644 %TUREB E
HWooddqura TIONAI BANK
333 S. Hop 6 59.
t
( Lob "ho. CA Wn
~'6513t,3~~' 1.1220OO434q
2B1"9 23 296 ~'OOOOQ9& L~ 7.' ~
till
lit
1
1
1 ~
f
03SS300»d
I'~1 00'019
74 tiz de, yr
"j I.
~'"1,'~ I •P.~'1'F .~,'^A , A y'• y I.,.I I:,,b~! I.bdi.:l~'. , x!44
49
i
2651L-1/3689
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT
FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES;
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equip-
ment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of
state law and City ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has '
reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or
services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for
the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the
materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted
herein; NOW, THEREFORE,
• r~
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the numbered items in the following numbered
bids o- rma Serials, equipment, supplies, or servi-,es, shown in the
"Bid Proposals" on file in the Office of the City's 'Purchasing
Agent filed according to the bid number assigned thereto, are
hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids
for such items:
BID ITEM
NUMBER NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
12~:--_ 16~ AAjtC1?nS rnwrr"Ar-c Txr_ VYUTR_m s
1248 2'a-S DELTA DISTRIArITOM INC. E 1BIT A
1248 4 SCHOLLE CORP. EXHIBIT A
1248 7' _ CARDS CHEMICAL CO. EEHIBIT A
1248 8 _UPC INDUSTRIES INC. EYHIBIT A
1248 9_ FL+. 3 0c. _ EBHIBIT A
1248 10 DOLPHIN COMMERCIAL at KIAL INC. EXHIBIT A
LQ A141, S. D. MEYERS
1251 1.2 MR CONSTRUCTTON ~$113,~nr; nn
}
7
r
a
i
roval of the above
the acceptance the dCipy accepts the offer
SECTION II• That by agrees to
numb ere terns of the submitted bids ,
of the persons submitting the bids iorsupplies items ai services in such materials, equIPmenications, standards quantities
purchase the terms, P
specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid
accordance with the
and for the s Pe
Proposals, and related documents' sons submitting
That should the City and per
SECTION III. ::he submitted bids wish
he
as, a result of the
approve an accepted items and of
a formal written ag f the bids, the City Manager
to execute 1
enter into a royal, and awarding o
acceptance, pp sentative is hereby authorized that
Hated repre hereto; rovided
,
or his desi8 ts) conditions
ract the written contract isi in shall
the written con ttw~tls dPEh~fiedmsums contained
specifications, standards, quantities an
in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein approved and
accepted. royal of the above
SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval
Council hereby 111
numbere terns of the submitted bids the written
authorizes the expenditure of funds thoreipursuante to °u~t and eo in accordance with the approved bids or P
contract made pursuant thereto as authorized hl become effective
ordinance shall
SECTION V. That this royal.
imme ate y upon its passage and app
~ 1991
day of
PASSED AND APPROVED this
BOB CASTLEBMY r 'MAYOR
ATTEST:
3:6LVIFER WALTE S, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVXD'AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA LDAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
PAGE TWO
7 +l
`Y
r.
MLBIT A y
BID 1248 I
I I .
I I 1
BIDWATER TREATMENT CHEMCIAL IBID AWARD I BID AWARD VENDORS I
I PRICE. I
OPE 5-7-91 1 I 1
------E-M---DES---~CRIP--T-I--ON --__--I----------I-------------------
TT
IT I I I
I
---I
1 ILIQUID CHLORINE 1 $280 TON IHARCROS CHEMCIALS 1
2 ISODIUM HE%AMETAPHOSPHATE I 5525# (DELTA DISTRIBUTORS I
3 ISODIUM SILICOFLUORIDE 1 .2711 IDELTA DISTRIBUTORS I
4 (SULFURIC ACID 66 COMMIL I $6f; TON ISCHOLLE CORP. I
IORADE I I I
5 ITETRAPOTASSIUM 1 .779# IDELTA DISTRIBUTORS 1
IPYROPHOSPHATE 95% P04 I I
6 ILIQUID CAUSTIC SODA 1 $360 TON IHARCROS CHEMICALS 1
7 (POTASSIUM PERMANAGANATE 1 1.295# ICARUS CHEMICAL I
8 (ANHYDROUS AMMONIA 1 .1825# IDPC INDUSTRIES INC. 1 L.,
9 ILIQUID FERRIC SULFATE 1 $96 TON IFE 3 INC. 1
101SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1 1.15 GAL IDOLPHIN COMM. CHEMICI
I I I I
! I I I
I I
I I I I
I I I I
~I I 1
I 1
I I I
--I 1- - I
I
I
r
DATEi MAY 21, 1991
Sr3_T~'. ~4Si~i&~L_R~PQRT
TO; Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS - BID #12118
tQbM~b28T~4lII Council approve award of Bid #1248 Water
Treatment Chemicals to the low bidders meeting
speoifioations:
~ararsn-S~hamiga],~,.~ns..,. c?
ITEM 1 LIQUID CHLORINE $280.00 TON
ITEM 6 LIQUID CAUSTIC SODA $360,00 TON
~al~a_~1,s,1ir31tn><Qr.;~.~nQ~
ITEM 2 SODIUM HEXAMETAPHOSPHATE $ .5525 # I
ITEM 3 SODIUM SILICOFLUORIDE $ .271 #
ITEM 5 TETRAPOTASSIUM PYROPHOSPHATE $ .779 #
I
~Qh5t.1..7,5_~CAr n • y
R ,
ITEM 4 SULFURIC ACID $ 65.00 TON
S~3CY.g-~hSml,aal_ ~Qmla.Brsx
ITEM 7 POTASSIUM PERMANGANATE $ 1.295 #
~P,Sc _InsiJd;~ r 1.~n_In 4 ~
ITEM 778 ANHYDROUS AMMONIA $ .1825 #
ITEM 9 LIQUID FERRIC SULFATE $ 96.00 TON
2.u1, n h.in_~Qmms rs,tal_~hamisal~_Yn9.~.
ITEM 10-- SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE $ 1.15 GAL
This bid is for a one year period with the option to renew.
Annual purchases for all items combined are estimated to be
$445,000.00.
SuMMflRli This bid is for the price comparison of water
treatment chemicals used in water production, electric
production, wastewater treatment and swimming pool
applications,
M '
r:
r /e!
y'
CITY ,
COUNCIL REPORT
MAY 21, 1991
PAGE 2 OF 2
LALLQ$ URL: Tabulation sheet,
Electric -PoducoT_QB__gB4~~,~_dFEESTEL: Water
Electric Production
Wastewate
Recreation. r Production,
Treatment, Parks and
F~I,S~dL_,IMEB~ rT: Bud ,
aooounts Fo $eted funds i"
Electric Produotfoner ProduotionVailable in the chewioal
and Parks andI Wastewater Treatment,
Recreation. ~i
Respe fully submitted
Lloyd V.
Prepared by. city Manager
: -
Nam -
e l ani
Title: Mee Hard
Buyer n
4P roved,
Name: _
Tom D. Shaw
j
Title: Purchasing Agent _
MH/,jh
155.DOB
r r
- - -
BID # 1248 I I
I I I ! I I I 1 f i I I
BID WATER TRFAINM C1UMJAL iDELTA DLSPI DPC I DOLPHIN i Ct1ET1- I tatotlF I AM4ONIA I Reams 11tANrocac I SCtiC(lE 1 EAGLE- I
,
OPEN 5_7_91 ! INC, i INiXJST. CHtMI. I CENItm I INC. j b W~ I RCUST. i om. BtKICK
I ! ! I ! I _1~_ I _I I I
ITEM "MM ON I WWR I VENDOR I VENDOR I MWR I VENDOR I M OR I VMR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VE7" I
-I I I 1-1.- i I -J 1_ 1 1-1
1 I LIQUID CALORINf6 ( NIB 11285.00 1 N/B i N/B I NIB I NIB i NIB I NIB I N/B 1 N/B 1
2 1 -MLH M£T'APHC75P1 m I .5525# ( .645# I N/B 1 NiB I N/B I NIB I NIB 10.599 6Mi NIB I N/B
3 1 SWIM SILIC<kLIORIDE I .271# i .335# 1 N/B I NIB I NIB I N/B 1 N/B 1 .2745 I N/B I NIB
I
4 I SASMc ACID 66 CCM IL 1 82. T0N I NIB I NIB I NIB I 72.62 1 NIB I NIB 1 N/S 1 65. I N/B
i
1 GRAD;., I ! I I I f 1 i I I i
5 I T rRAPTASSIiJr1 1 .779# 1 .855# I N/B ! N/B I NIB I N/B I NIB 1.805 3R) NIB I NIB 1
I PYROPHCTMTE 95% P04 I 1(50(") 1 I I I 1 1.89 1 YR I I I
6 1 LIQUID CA=C Sn i #366.TON 1 0#363,50 1 NIB I NIB I N/B ( N/B I N/B 1 NIB I N/B I NIB I
7 1 'OrPASSdLP! PMVMAOANATB 1 1.396 I 1.32# I N/B I N/B I NIB I NIB 1 N/B I N/B I H/B I N/B
i
8 I A*ffDROM M400 1 NIB i .1825 I NIB i NIB I NIB I .19# I 0.13# 1 .2175#` 1 AVB I N/B 1
9 I LIQUID EE MC allATE I NM I NIB I NIB 1 NIB I NIB I N/B I NIB I NIB I NIB 1133.90 TNI
101 SCDRH HYPOOLORIM I NIB I NIB 11.15M i NIB I NIB I N/B I N/B ft,89 cX I N/6 I NIB I
! ( ! I I I f ! 1 I
DELIVERY 1 1-2 LAYS 1 2-3 DAYS 1 1-2 DAYS 1 12 DAYS 1 2 DAYS 1 2 DAYS 15 LAYS 1 1 DAY 124 HOM
AMEN" I YES I YES I YES I YES I YES ( - 1 1 I YES i YM I
I*FDH TIIRUI 00ET11r1 I I I 1 ( OSEB >R*fa(m P1311 I I f
16-30-91 I 411Ri7 I I I 1 (ANALYSIS I SRE7C I I I
I I tt-t5-9t i I I I f I#.65 ~I I
i I#+2,70/rN I I I I I 11 YEAR i I !
I i:ztPEl~vEO l _I i I I I J .I ,
r ,
F ~
i
i
,
i
J
i
i
i~
i,
f~
BID 0 1248 I I I I i I
BID WATER T'REAThlEW ClOrM ( MICAN I CARDS i I ARKLA I HARCIM f
1 RM. I CMUCAL I I amgc& I f ,
OPEN 5-7-91 ! I I I I I
1 I I I I I
0 I nm DE9CRI1? m I VENDOR 1 VENM 1 VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I
1 ! LIQITID CHLORINS 1 NIB rl NM I 11/1 1475. TCN I 280.00 1
2( S(DTLM m{AtvAmomiATE I NIB I N/B I NIB I N/B I .60750 I
3 1 SODnH MI101LUORmE I N/B ! NIB I N/B I NIB 1 •34# I
4 1 5UIAWC ACID 66 COMIL I NIB I N/B 170.00 TON I NIB 1 79 T10N I
I GRADE I I I I I 1
5 I Ttv"PRAPCrPASSlM i N/B I N/9 I N/13 I NIB 1 .83500 1
I PYROP1IOMMTF 9% Poo 1 I E I I I
6 1 LIQUID CAIMC SODA I N/B I NIB I N/B 1*389.00 IN 1360.00 TN I
7 1 PamssRkf pElr1ANAOANATE 1 1.4617 # 1 1.2950 1 NIB I NIB I 1.340 I
A l ANHYDROM 000 I NIB i NIB I N/B f NIB I .21100
9 1 LIQUID FERRIC SUIFATF I NIB I NIB 196.00 TON I NIB 1180.13 TCNI i
101 SODIUM HYPOCf1<AAIIE I NIB I NIB 1 NIB I NIB I NIB
I
DR IVERY 1 5 DAYS 1 5-7 DMS 1 1 DAY 11 DAY 1 3 DAYS I 1
ADDS NDW 1 I I YES I I NO I
I I MIN. I I*FIRN 6 r1O1 I
I 120 x 110.21 IMArHRAOt4 I I
I I DRtrs I I CAUSTIC I ! {
! I I ..I I 1
i
I
t
E
1
I
1
r
„v4
to
7
DATE; May 21, 1991
S~ITI-,~QlLI~ScIL_$FPQ$T
TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID #1212 - DISPOSAL OF PCB TRANSFORMERS
RUDIJ NDAZUR t We recommend this bid be awarded to the low
bidder, evaluated S.D. Meyers, for an estimated amount of
$44,459.87 or unit price as followst
LICE ~AL_EE~_YQU~P LEA -IRAS! 4LQ a.Q$Z_.TI{Afi_450
UIT_I$ZLL lII~IZkHS
Transformers .2
Switches 1.25 5 .53
Debris .30 1.25
•30
I MIXAR11 This bid is for disposal of PCB contaminated
transformers, oagaoitors, oil switches and debris which has
been or is bei;tg removed from the Electric Distribution
system. Dispr,sal will be in accordance with all federal,
state and local requirements.
xl
fl4~. K2 B.9 VN Tabulation sheet, Memorandum Glenn Fisher
Distribution,
Electric
.EINAL_I112AUt Budgeted account 610-080-0252-8334.
Respe fully submitted:
i r
J
Lloy Y. Harrell
Manager
Prepared by;
NameDenise Ha pool
Title: Senior Buyer
Appt{oKed t
Name: --Tom D.-Sh
aw, C.P.M.
Title: Purchasing Agent
DH/,jh
1242.DOC
r
9
BID N 1242 I I 1
I I I I i I
31D N Dl,%OsAL CF P(8 I I AC1I IIIS 1 J
axrr»rr a DEBRLS APTUS S.D. ~ 1 UNISM I
~ 1'I•E'TAI(, ? I i
Om APAII. 16, 1991 aorAcK
ITFM IT41 DE+yCATP1ICN i VMWR I VF?m0A 1 -I f
_ I VE710UR I VMR I MWR 1
1 I I I
1 f TAANSGOII,+ERi l~446 I At,,r~ 3723 ,230 I 1.23 j
I I I .390 i .345 I .530 ! .410 I
2 I CAPACrM% I 1.250 I N/B 1
- 1.050 iDOMM I
1 I ABOVE I 1.750 !
I
I ! ALT. .3723 1 I f
3 i wl4CtiBS: .446 I .390
- ' I .:375 1 t .250 I 1.750
4 I DEI3RLS i .250 I ALT. .60 1 I 1 I
I ! 600 i .280 ! .300 1 1.75
JID # 1242 I 1 I
31D N DISPCiSAL CF PC8 j g1gH,~, I
! t>tzt~ j t
DWIffiQrp S DkBRIS 1 WASTE ! SEAVICFS 1
'fN APM 161 1991 I mw I I
CTEMI I7FM CE9cm:Frct1 1 I i
f I VEMM I vEMM
1 f TRAN410h~= I .450 I .880 1
I I
2 I CAPACITORS: 1 1.25 I 2.100 1
3 f O1L 2jrMWr I .400 I 2.000 1
I 1
4 E DEBRIS 1
1 .300 ! .600 1
1
t
t
I~
i
! ~II
7
1
CITY& DENTQN MUNICIPAL UTILITIES / 901 •A Texas Street/ Denton, TX 78201
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent
FROM: Glenn Fisher, Electric Engineering Associate I_~.,
DATE: May 15, 1991
SUDJECT: DISPOSAL OF PCB TRANSFORMERS, BID $1242
i•
The Utilities staff recommends that the above referenced bid be
awarded to the low bidder meeting specifications.
For bid 01242, Disposal of PCB Transformers, the low bid meeting
specifications was received from S. D. Meyers for an estimated i
total of $44,459.87. The City will be billed on the actual
weight of the transformers with 90% net on pickup and 10% due
when we receive the Certificates of Destruction.
' This item is tentatively scheduled for the May 15, Public
Utilities Board meeting.
Please see the attached spreadsheet for a breakdown of the bid. j
GF:th !
05151228
Attachments
cc: R. E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities
E. B. Tullos, Director of Electric Utilities
i
1
a
i
e
May 21, 1991
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO. MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF S.D. MEYERS PROPOSAL FOR i
DISPOSAL OF PCB EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS, BID NO.
1242.
,
RECOMMENDATION
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of
5/15/91, recommended the approval of S.D. Meyers
proposal for Bid No. 1242 at an estimated cost of
$44,459.87.
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND
On April 41 1991, the city received eight (8) bids for
the disposal of PCB contaminated material. Bids were
submitted on a price per pound basis using the
estimated weights provided by the City for
transformers, oil switches, capacitors and debris.
From the evaluation, it was found that S.D. Meyers
provided the low bid using the estimated weights. Refer
to Exhibit I for a breakdown of all bids received.
S.D. Meyers has been dealing with PCB eguipment for
over ten (10) years and is an EPA certified disposer.
Exhibit II outlines their experience and references.
PROGRAM/DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED
The City of Denton ratepayers, Electric Utilities
Department, Purchasing Department, Public Utility
Board, City Council.
r r
i t
~i
r
t
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT
The cost of this contract is approximately $44,459,87.
Funds are set aside in account number
610-080-0252-8334-K50 in the amount of $66,000.
Respectfully submitted,
1 yd Harrell
City Manager
i
Prepared by,
4
,
E. Tullos
Director E is Utilities
Approved by,
R.E. Nelson,
Executive Director of Utilities
i
Exhibit I: Bid List
II: Reference
III: Public Utilities Board Minutes of 5/15/91
IV: Ordinance/Purchasing Department
s,
6 2
i
:i
q
Exhibit 1
Bid # 1242, PCB Equipment Disposal
-
Estimated Weight (Pounds)
Xfmrs 112,749
Switches 74
Debris 13,000
Oil Carcass Debris Price per pound Additional Total
Vendor. .Disposal.. Disposal Disposal. Xfmrs_Switches Debris Costs ....Cost Comments
General Electric- Incineration Landfill ~Landfill_ 0.446 0.446 0.25 $920.00 $54,489.06_
tus, tian 1 Incineration _ Landfill _ Landiiii 0.372 0.37230.6 _ _ $49,804.00 90% Not 1
Aptus, l(on2 Inclr! ration Landfill Landfill.. 0.39 0.39 0.6 $51,800.97 60% Net
Unison Inclneratlon Destruction Landfill 0.41 1.75 1.75 $84,983.32 <500 ppm
1.23 1.75 1.75 - - - $65,249.31 >500 fin?
Rollins Incineration _ Landfill Landfill ~ 0.395 0.375 0.28 $2,073.75 _ _ $50,277.36_ _
SD Meyers Dechlorination Destruction Landfill 0.23 1.25 0.3 $21,842.11 <450ppm
0.53 1.25 013 - - - - M617.76 >450ppm
Chemical Waste Dechlorination Landfill Landfill 0.45 0.4 0.3 - - $54,666.65
United Services 0.88 2 O.II - - - - $107,167.12
{
Nob, TdndomxiwO*wnwPCBeonanhtlbn"u*:
conoonkmon W Abo)
>4 0 p m 3160
> 00 ppm PPM 334,447 +I
I 1
The low bid is,a►wliJded by 5. D. Meyers for an estimated total of $44,459. 8Z
1212 evt,wlc.1 - - May 1521993- ,
,
~ R
t aP
,j
I
Exhibit 2
REFERENCES
S, D. Meyers was founded a 1965 to provide services related to
the maintenance and rehabilitation of power transformers. In
1981, they recieved EPA authorization to begin transformer
retrofill services. They began limited scale, EPA supervised
transformer disposal in 1982 and became fully permitted in 1985.
For disposal, they first drain the transformer or switch of oil.
i'
The oil is chemically dechlorinated using a potassium 2based
solution so that it has non-detectable (<10 ug/100 cm per EPA
requirements) levels of PCB. The solution is then incinerated.
The transformer or switch is disassembled and all parts are put
through a wash/solvent technique to remove residual PCBs from the
surface to a level at or below 10 ug/100 cm All parts except
for wood and paper are smelted at Weingold & Company, Cleveland,
Ohio and reclaimed. The wood and paper is incinerated at an EPA
approved Incinerator. All debris generated by the City will be
landfilled at the U. S. Ecology landfill in Beatty, Nevada.
Verbal confirmation from Priscilla Almandi of the EPA shows that
S. D. Meyers is inspected quarterly and has had no major
violations within the past five years.
The following is a list of references contacted by the City
concerning S. D. Meyers;
Oh9o Edison
Akron, Ohio
Harrold Lubbeck
Ohio Edison has used S. D. Meyers exclusively for disposal over
the past five years. They are audited by Ohio Edison yearly to
verify compliance with Edison's requirements.
Pennsylvania Power
New Castle, Pennsylvania
Dan Walsh
They have used S. D. Meyers exclusively for transformer disposal
for the past three years and for retrofill for six years. They
periodically use them for testing services and other functions.
7
..I
Ye
S
y
k~
r.
Page 2
Exhibit 2
Centel Electric
Pueblo, Colorado
Matt Marobich
Centel has used S. D, Meyers for transformer retrofil~ for the
past seven years with no problems, Their selection o` S, D,
Meyers was based on bid prices and site visits made to them,
Aptus and others,
Baltimore Gas & Electric
Baltimore, MD
Dan Pietruszka
Baltimore G & E uses S, D, Meyers along with other disposal
firms, They have had no problems with S. D, Meyers,
Also, General Electric and Westinghouse use S, D, Meyers for
disposal.
GF:tn
1242_EX2,PUB
i
I
.1
4
i p
ry
EXCERPT
MINUTES
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
May 15, 1991
4. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF S.D.MEYERS PROPOSAL FOR DISPOSAL
OF PCB EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS, BID NO. 1242.
Tullos directed the Board's attention to a list of
transformers identified as having PCBs in them. These
Wagner transformers were purchased in 1972.
Thompson stated the Board would like the Legal i'
department to put Into these contracts a requirement
that all disposal will be donE according to
Environmental Protection Agency
that certification that this has been done dIsdgiven to
the City by the Contractor.
Ridens made a motion to approve disposal of these
transformers according to Bid #11242. Second by Frady.
All ayes, no nays, motion carried.
I
i
11
f
F
l
DATES MAY 21, 1991
TOs Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd It. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECTS BID # 1251 REMODEL DENTON PUBLIC LIBRARY
11-922MSERPAIIHs we recommend this bid be awarded to the
lowest bidder DAR Construction in the amount of $10,986,00
for Item 1 and 2 combined and that item 3 be awarded under
separate contract at a later date.
U11MA$Ys This bid is for the relocation and remodeling of
the ramp area between the first and second level of the ;
library and (2) the remodeling of the main entrance way to
add a new glass door way and air look, The third and
optional portion of the bid was to rebuild, refinish and
reinstall the original wooden doors removed from the main
entrance several years ago.
Our recommendation is to award item 1 and 2 and to rebid
item 3.
flAScKg=jQ: Tabulation sheet. 1
E~S~SAb+--EEE9$?ENT__Qfl__53~4LP~__AEE~TEas Denton Publio
Library and the citizens of Denton. Construction hours will
be limited to 6:00 A,M 2s00 P.M. to lessen the
inconvenience to library patrons,
ElAUAL_SMEAUi Funds for this project will come from
Library Bond Account number 6436-033-0088-881-9101,
Respe tfully submitted:
i
Lloyd V. Harrell
City Manager
Approveds
_-Y~~
Names-Tom Shaw, C.P.M.
Titles Purchasing Agent
TS/,jh
156,DOC
} j
I z
Jr
r
BID A 1251 I I
I MARK I JONES AND I DBR
I I RUCTION NAME REMOnEL DENTON PUBLIC LIBRARY HOLDERBAUM IJEFFREY CONST. CONST i
OPEN MAY 9, 1991 I 1 I I
i I I I
Iteml DenoripLion l- - I I I
Vendor i Vendor 1 Vendor I
1 I I i.^. I
I I
1 I REMODEL WALK RAMP
I I $8,250,00 I $10,250,00 ! $7,561.00 I
2 1 REMODEL ENTRY RAMP I l I
I I $4,500.00 1 $3,254.00 I $9,1425.40 I
I TOTAL ITEM 1 AND 2 I I I I
I I $12,750.00 I $13,540,00 I $10,986.00 I
I I ! l
f I I I I
3 1 OPTIONAL REPAIR AND INSTALL I I I I
I WOODEN DOORS I $1,150.40 I $3,504.00 I NIB
~ I I I ~
I ITEMS It 2 AND 3 TOTAL r I I
I I $13,900.004 I $179040.00 j NIA i
~ I I i l
I I I I
~J
i
t
J
2651L-5/3689
i
NO, _
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR PURCHASES
OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WIi%H ARE AVAILABLE FROM ONLY ONE SOURCE
PUR HAS SDAFRO i RWITH THE EQUIREMENTS OFS COMPE TITIVEABIDSA AND EXEMPTING PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE,
WHEREAS, Section 252.022 of the Local
Government
that procurement of items that are only availablefromoone psourceg
including: items that are only available from one source because
of patents, copyrights, secret
films, manuscripts or books; electricity or natural monopolies;
utility purchases; captive replacement partssorw comer and or
ponents tfor
equipment; and library materials for a public library that are ,
availablteo the mfrom the aterials; persons
notholding
to distribution
submitted exclusive
bids; and
competitive
WHEREAS, the C3.ty Council wishes to procure one or more of the
items mentioned in the above paragraph; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
mentSorTlsOpp ies, as d scribed win hec"Purcha em Orders~sattached
hereto, are hereby approved:
PURCHASE
ORDER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT
--Llk2z-- LB.K. !83.496 00
- 1362_ I,g,M, l~8.995 96
SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above
items s a not constitute a contract between the City and the
person submitting the quotation for such items until such person
shall comply with all requirements specified by the Purchasing
Department.
SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to
execute any contracts relating to the items specified in Section I
and the expenditure of funds pursuant to said contracts is hereby
authorized.
ir•
i {
f
k
b
F
1
SECTION IV, That this ordinance shall become effective
imme ate y upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
)1991
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
t
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
f
i
a
DATE; May 21, 1991
• S.I:1Y_~9Si~19.IL_SEEQBT '
TOs Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROMs Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER 013622 IBM IN THE AMOUNT OF
$83,496.00
212 MMUDAII9N: We recommend this purchase order be approved
in the amount of $83,496.00 to IBM.
UMMA$Yt This purchase order is for the annual maintenance
of IBM software utilized by the Information Servioe Data
Center. Included in this software maintenance aost is the
rent or lease of the software and any new releases or
upgrades that may be developed as well as assistance with
technical problems.
This maintenanos is protsotod by copyrights and only
available from one source. It is therefore exempt from the
bid prooese as defined in ohapter 252, purchasing and
contracting authority of Munioipalities,
GOVERNMENT CM 1990 Edition.
Data 1
processing advisory board recommends approval of this ~
purchase order.
".CLi DUD: Purchase order 13622, IBM.
pBQORAMS. DEpggTME~iT_~g..Q$QIIE$~AEFE~TE1~j Information
Services.
FLUAL__IMEAST: 1990-91 Budget funds account number
100-044-0080-8521 Special Services.
Reape fully submitteds
4L 40
Lloyd V. Harrell
City Manager
Approved:
Names Tom D. Shaw, ~C.P.M.~
Titles Purchasing Agent
TS/jh
158.DOC
1 ti.
G
i
rl
r;
r t IIS IS A_.-•._.___._. r~
CONFIRMING ORDER
(IF MARKED)
DO NOT DUPLICATE A PURCHASE ORDER N0: PC 13622
This number most appear nil
rnvolces, deRvery sry slips, cases,
q No' Bid No; ctns., boxes, pricking slips and WJ9.
Date: 05 14, 91 Pago No01
OR IBM 817/38JPURCNASING.7100 O1V1S10N OIFW ME /901•B TRO rENAS 81)1267.0042 rASTREErIOE,rN8J'17ON, rEXAS76201
n
P.0. BOX 660176 E3S DALLAS, TX 75266
1,)874692
DELIVERY
ADDRESS INFORMATION SERVICES
324B E. MCRINNEy
DENTON, TX 76201
ENDOR NO. DELIVERY QUOTED
05 31 91 FOB DESTINATION
' TERMS
1 •
LT VM/SP SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE i'
83,496.00 83,496.00 x
I
r
r
OZ 100 044 0080 8521
83,496.00 I
PACE TOTAL; 83,496.00
Uq IN9 7I~UCTIONS:.
RAND TOTALS 83,496.00
xi orgy rlal Invobe wit7t dupl~r,fe copy, a. Terms Net 30 {Unies~ rtitl. oedrrod,l
to - Acs, ante Payable 4. Shipping instructions: F.O,B. Uestlnalion Prepaid 1unlese aMf sa enecfredl
215 E.14cKrnnsy St. 6. No federal or stale sales tax shall be Included
Dnnfnq, Tx 7APn 1 In prices billed,
PiacBaslryn Divlnlon
r RR ny~
i
1
1
4
DATEi MAY 21, 1991
~.~TY_~,4B~I&~L_B EPQBT
Tot Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROMr Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT; PURCHASE ORDER #13623 - IBM IN THE AMOUNT OF
$58,995.96,
$E~QdM~tpAT~Q~(: We recommend purchase order 13623 in ~I
amount of $58,995,46P be approved, the
i
UMMA$X: This purchase order
$58p995. to IBM in the amount of
9 b is for the annual maintenance of the hardware
located in the City of Denton Information Service Center,
This is the second year of a five year agreement that allows
for minimum response time from IBM technicians of 2 hours
and a maximum price a,norease of 3% per year where as the
industry standard is aviraging 10-15x.
This service is a single source acquisition and only
available from IBM and is therefore exempt from the bid
process as defined in Chapter 252 Purchasing and Contracting
Authority of Municipalities,
g_~ Oov~p~nL
1990 Edition,
Data Processing Advisory Board has recommended the five year
agreement and approval of this purchase order,
~.ASI{SiB4li~72r Purchase order 13623 to IBM.
~vce+~ ~BEPflHTM~~IT___~$__gB9~IP~~__BEEE~TEL : Information
serviovs.
EIS&AL_TMPAfU: 1990-91 Budget funds
Account number 100-044-•0080-8509 Special
Services,
Respe t£ully submittedi
T G~~ pp
Lloyd V, Harrell
City Manager
Ap roved r
Names Tom U.~Sha
w~ C,P M
TA' le; Purchasing Agent
TS/ jh
159.DOC
rrlF
v
Fi
it
'i
Iz
i
V
CONFIRMING ORDER
(IF PURCHASE ORDER NO: PC .13623
MARKED) Thls number must appear on all
DO NOT DUPLICATE LJ invoices, delivery sups, cases, - .
clns., boxes, packing slips and bills. ,
leq No: Uld No: Oafs: 05 14 91 Page No. 01
IDOR IBM PURCNASINGOIVISION1901.BTEXASSrREETIOENTON,TEXAS76201
IE/ P.O. BOX 660176 817/383.7100 01rWMETR0817121.0042 rAX811138246.92
TRESS DALLAS, TX 75265 DELIVERY INFORMATION SERVICES -
ADDRESS 324 A.E. MCKINNEX
DENTONr TX 76201
VENDOR NO. DELIVERY QUOTED' 05 31 91 FOS DESTINATION 'TERMS
~ 1.
11 1 LT HARDWARE MAINTENANCE 58,995.96 "5180995.96
,
,
t
01 100 044 0080 8509 58,995,96 PAGE TOTAL: 58,995.96
RAND TOTAL: 58095.96
hIDOR INSTRUCTIONS: 3. Terms - Net 30 (unless olhem ise specifed,)
-
Send original ce with duplicate copy,
Big 4. Shipping Instructions: F.O.B. Destination prepaid (unless ou erwise elveRied)
IG Accounts Payable 6, No federal or elate sales lax shall be Included
n2^n 7n~n16,, T tvX 76901 St. In prices billed,
Nirrone7R Purchasing DIV;$1011
4
ORDINANCE NO. _
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING A COMPETITIVE SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING
A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR
SERVICESI PROVIDING FOR THE' EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated com-
petitive sealed proposals for the purchase of necessary materials,
equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures
cf state law and City ordinance" and
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has reviewed
and recommended that the herein described proposals are the best
responsible proposals for the materials, equipment, supplies or
services as shown in the "Proposals" submitted therefore and
WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the city P,udget for '
the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of tho ma-
If terials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted
herein; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
q=ION_ I. That the numbered items in the following numbered
bids for materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the
"Proposals" on file in the Office of the City's Purchasing Agent
filed according to the number assigned thereto, are hereby accepted =
and approved as being the lowest responsible bids for such items:
ITEM
NUMBER NO. VENDOR
AMOUNT
1202 All Wang Laboratories, Inc.
$238,858.00
SECTION II. That by the acceptance and approval of the above
numbered items of the submitted proposals, the city accepts the
offer of the persons submitting the proposals for such items and
agrees to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services
in accordance with the terms, specifications, standardsuantities
and for the specified sums contained in the Invitations, Proposals,
and related documents,
i
i CT3 III. That should the City and
rsons -
proved and accepted items and of the submit ed proposals submittinwig
enter into a formal written agreement as a result of the accep-
tance, approval, and awarding of the proposal, the city Manager or
his designated representative is hereby authorized to exicute the
written contract which :.,hall be attached hereto] provided that the
written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions,
specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained
RIT
6
t~
1, , ..qp
r 'LtTtp
1
in the Proposal and related documents herein approved and accepted,
ECTI N IV. That by the acceptance and
approval numberedzes
oriitemstheof the spenditurubmittf
e ed proposals, thCit
o
funds eby
uth ex therefor in the amount and in
accordance with the yCoto a uncilwrieherttenabove
a approved proposal or pursuant
contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein.
SECT ON V. That this ordinance shall become effective imme-
diately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this
day of '
1991.
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY i
BY:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
wti~
i
i
i
f
c
f
s
i .t
s 1
~d
DATE:
05/21/#1 ~
CITY COUNCIL RBPOR_ T.FORMAT
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
I
f FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: RFP #1'202 WORD PROCRSSINC SYSTEM REPLACEMENT
R0COMMRNDATIOR:
Wo re00mmend this RFP #1202 be awarded to Wang Laboratories Inc, in
the amount of $238,858.00.
SUMMARY:
This request for proposal is for the lease purchase of Word
Processing equipment including hardware, software, maintenance,
lease costa, microfiche capabilities and training, The equipment
wiV replace existing equipment that has been in use for over 10
years and has become obsolete due to technology improvements aild ,
heavy use.
For additional information please reference the Word Processing
System Replacement Report submitted at the work session of Mey 21,
1991,
BAL'KaROUup;
Memorandum to Lloyd Harrell, City Manager from Gary Collins, ~
Director of Information Services dated May 141 1991 and the Word
Proooasing. System Replacement Report.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Information Services, Word processing Center and the other
dopartments and divisions that utilize their services as well as the
Customer Servics Division of the Finance Department,
FI9~; .IMF, CT:
Funds for the acquisition of this equipment will come from current
budget funds for maintenance of existing equipment in the amount of
$23,494,00 and an additional $24,000.00 from Customer Service
Special Services (miarofiohe) budget funds. Funds over the five
year period for these services would be $263,436,00.
These accounts total sufficient dollars to make monthly payments
without increases to baseline budgets.
This is a five year lease purchase acquisition. Monthly payments
will remain unchanged and proper funding out or non-appropriation
clauses are written into the contract should funds become no longer
available,
3369s
t
ar f.
F
~i
1
,
CITY COUNCIL, REPORT
MAY 21, 1991
PACE 2 OF 2
Respectfully submittedr
arroll--------------
City Manager
APProyodi
Namej Tom D. 5haw,yC,P.M.
't'itles Purohasing Agent
Ts/Jh
159.DOC
i
i
I
1
I
r:
? a
4
1
Invostgsnt aUa a..
M:count,
➢acet OCSlt /6oif Danton ?INAL
91 ! 873a /
Nadal Sknbor
DesctlptSvn Unlt
- Lxtandad
! Coat
coat - Discount Net cost
Nalntenance
vs servr Inatallati on
CPU$ s
SJS40v-ABR RM D 5440 SM CPU/5 -SLOT
1 16,940,00 16,840.00
Inclndent 1 S)S40V-88R RW'D 7410 8101 1,694.00 16,65(.00 42.00
1 5100-alt CPD/5 -SLOT cRASBIs/141" 1,500.00
l 5440-aR AMWID. VSS)00 COASSIO M/14SNB :NTZAMAL 01910
1 5440V O•OL REWrD 006 VS5440 4s0 gpw,
4 V8 Op SYS :,I'`MSE-VS5440
CPU optlone
S00p-C?:-U5 '7D 5000 COVIVMY KIT ,OsA
( 0.00
0.00
IOP~a/Device controller 0•Da 0100
0.00 0.00
SOV61P PIEWL).32 PORT SERIAL .,M
1 2,550,00 2,550.00 2r
50V?6-iA.Q K/
Rf?FT',2 ,5.00
P011T Tc ccwmOL"A y 2,295.00 12.00
vs-p"-.5001: 1,360,00 2, 'i20.00 2'
V5 5000 RI3"r' QUINT PAMAIE 2,00 2,448,00 24.00
1 500.00 500.60 0.00
Maas 9totu.le 75.00
425.00 9.00 M
0100
2230V-3R-ENta R(31?1' :csl 1/4' SrRGNLR IAPC 1
2269V-S»' 1,695.00 1,695.00 164.50
h7,7R YEHYC STORAt>1': NOD0L1; M/3261PA 1
7 1,610.25 10,00 91.75
4,, 350950.DD00 4,795.00 p~00
c/22b9V-61'- r;!(PLjVR" b50(as 1'0 scat DISK 4,50 0.00 35.00
l , 0.00
ISM-C d7OPA0E NO(Wlz N)o DRIVES 1 500 7r30.00 1,108.:5 6,507.60 12.00 2?1.85
Nan stnc,~p .00 500.00 t
::pFiacl 75.00 440,Q0 i
6.00 15.00 ~
N- ' +•XWTAY K12 CNTD STATES 1 j~
Motkatatt ,n.< 0'00 0.90 0.00 l
0.00 0100 U.00
t 2110AA nPIVb AVYNCNRONOUS Vs DP TVR14 1
580.00 sao.tla 10 4.40 I Morkat at lun ilcti;n_s 504,6C 5.00 20.00
2110A-'K»U:i ) '0A +.*X 1NITXD STATC3 11
1 0.00 o.ov
aaEtwatn 0.00 0.00 0.00
C,tltl
195-95U8-~
L UNr.,r b rolt V05, Jr, 6, 5E, 15, 1
0DC,00 2
j 540UV-tt:N •V?-) ,'S KE'1:IA/Lk:c01EF14T PAC , 0(10.0(1 320.00 L,990.0
5140V-MyJ,, V a M0s KSOt: 1 750.017 "50.00 l8(1,00 570. no 0.00
aONTRACTl5440 m 1 0,00 00 4.00 0,90
O.pU 0.00 0.00
95,UD O.Op
{
.j .j
{
Tnvwst.arnt Summma y
muount). Cityy of Denton rntu
DAtaI Os/f6/91 / 8778
Kudel Number Description Unit Extended
Qty Cast Coat
ftwrze Di !Count R*t Cost. KAintenrn
oe In-tail.----
ContlnueA)
DJ-133.-9 018 1p TO Vs LIST PROCx3S TRC
1 659.00 650.00 154.00 7ne~•a deai 1 OJ-1332-9 Drs LP 51 -s.50 C.00 19.50
1 195-4726-9 MS LIST PVROCEggr1R7 OK EVS
oJ-4aP/K-0 Crs MP 7tl DS/I7S YP eLS K
1 1,000.00 1.006.00
VS-3270-K-9 VF ACM" 3210 CORE CLS K 240.00 760.00 0,00
1 2,000,00 C,00
V5-OIFTCSK-O Vs OF'r'LCL CLS 2.000.00 480.00 1,520.00 r
K 1%..10 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
VS-113N3-NCS--9 VO MSR 11ET000 CLS K 0.00 31.00 0100
1 800.00 800,00
VSA-PILE-K-R V5A 1270 PC rILJ; TRANSPZ,R 192,00 600,00 5100 1 1,(100.00 0,00
VSA3270-WS-7 VS ACCESS 3270 1,000.00 :40.00 760.00
MOAT S/R 6.00 O. DO
1 8,000.00 a,000,00
VSSNA-)2748-4 Vs MIA 3271-1C r`WM"r0ll CLS K 1 1,920.00 6,320.00 44.tlU 210.00 t...:
800.00 800.00 192,00
VS31711-SOLC); 48 ::t1A HO LC M*AD CCW(;WZRr3 I 608.00 3.00 -
800.00 000.00 n Cthsr -Any troJacix 192, 0 608.00 ~ 0.00
220.052: 211::-V: CORTAL Clot 25,
I 15,00 15,00
220-362: C7: DAISY 1 roo? CAKLE 6.75 38.25 O.OD
I 99.00 90,00 0.90
421-0066 S47,1: T)ireRrACE rhloLL 8, 11.85 84.15 0.00
! 'CnA CoPD-Up r 2 99.00 198.00 29. YO 0,00
I47RP ,:OKD-0S 1 0.00 168.30 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
Syeter rotail 0.00 0.00
j SY9?pt 1_- tlcra,l xrvrc 55,422.00 7,907.45 19,6:4,65 O. W
36.00 2,110.10 '
} /osvt-rn .?u,. t. ro:la[ ~ 1
I
BO?7-1'C::'7; rk( '(',50JTP TNT.I)MD-PAIR
M049990J1 Lf ~;1:,T T:4TEP,.ZAV£ 1 ='99.00 799,00 87.78 311.:2
KO 111 0.00 1
KA4- Htnralq 165.00 165.00 0.00 165.00 0.00
1.90 O,rO
NAY490C26 150:;`5.; M LEST TALE DKIV17 R/ 1 6Y1.UU
1,6.,7.00 0,00
i HEN27002b LC '37M2, 16K3, 5,.'S•KK MREfI 2
11997.00 :,627.00 12.00
Prr- R Ot.•.l:rnt 3,780.00 0,00 a U.UO
.,180.00 27.00 O,OU
C/IW4-UCQ?.•p,;.? :Cd +•-,,-12b1r lSEK VXp 8C• (DIB) l 2
'09.00
76.OG :.1{.70 7.70
0.00
1 '
s ;
t,
E
. ,a
• Saw~~t Suelwl rJ +
Accountr Cltf eZ Denton FINAL
"'""'y'~'•~-'°."-Ya!•s-OS/16/91- - 9718
Unit Extended
11ode1. Muab•r Cvotiptlon Ct Coat Cost Discount Net Coat Hefnbeance Lnstel leYlon
PC's & Opttona -
(Coatlnuwd)
C/STN-0003 CCRIFL9 - 16N Or saws Sims 4 250.00 1,000.00 380.00 620,00 0.00 0,00
C1VD0-0006-?r2 CONED-16-SIT VOA vireo 1 245.00 245.00 93,10 151.90 0.C0 0.00
FAST380-0014-4 PC300/33c-OOt.4, 33lME, 89LOT, 41A 1 7,960,00 1,960.00 0.00 7,960.00 80.00 0,00
;ncludael 1 F,47390-0014-4 Pe380/33C-0014,33MZ,SSL0T,4M 5.25OPM,N£,T4Are 386
1 PC380/33C-0014 1.219/AT .M6/8 SLOT/331M2 cpV 410 1WR3AY/CACU
1 195-6099-EP NZTKLAC 3,11 250 VSeRS FOR FAST STAR PROM
PC7-724CK-05-9 P67-724CK-9 ONITCIJ 9TA4E9 1 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0100
Crmw,nl catt~n @etdwate
VMR40508 SYN1508 10-SASE-T TPAN3CLIVLR L 135.40 135.00 0.00 135.00 1100 0100
Soltwts
A
PC--DO34-9 CPEAATINO 9TSTD1 9/D 1 150.00 150,00 36.00 114.00 0.00 0.00
PROFOUND Crr7.kRx" MRMCRX C4f SLAVER t 5 1 995.00 995.00 0.00 995.00 17.00 0.00
/ r"OVNO Ve":IMRT ►WtAMR MR WOES L8 232.00 4, 176.00 0.00 4, 176.00 22,50 0.00
I Other Mang Vrodurte
HOW-140:: _4+ 1A %*%00 MWITCA-V. S. L1OV 1 245.00 245.00 93.10 151.90 oleo 0,00
i
system Total! 21,D77.00 765.98 20,3 L'.C2 157.50
OFSTt" If ; lenl..+ noJ Datewy
t
'r
14as Ste :a.ys
i
c/HDC-4•kl)-74 ;:<'IR':'1 4OND 29hS EAL7 U',GST i 700.00 500. Do 1,330.00 2,170.00 0.00 O,ifO
1
PC, a 6 CT t t rol 4-
C/P.PL°stH-&~; PEP LACE INS rr 2561010 5 p.50.0o 1,250.00 0.00
c,CU 1,»'40.00 0,00
PC17-7243ri•pi-dprl ~_^24CR-4 DMITLD STATES 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00
I ¢10230/le-;;01 'A't 4Y.M/5.5 SLOT/16MV 18 1,595.00 -4, ?t0.00 10,909,80 171 198. CO 0100
PC321/160-01011 1.441V fAf !`lTLj V(1A/P SLOT/1148 6 1,695,00 SU, 170.e0 3,964.60 61305.40 132.00 0100
pC5-'10.7 y Ft:'S-!t4CX-US fINITL0 STATES L8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 J.Oo 0100
Ibrke(nl;lsm~
NGCCA-Owl, 14-31`9 Otw. GFTICN BCW 4(irm L 750.00 150AU "to,fj0 540.CO 0100 7
O.OO '
i
S .
a.rt
t
q
, s
News
es
Dates 3
Y6odel t
Unit Eztendad
Number Description Qty -Coat-- -Cost-- Discount Not Cost Maintenance Installation
Printers
LUF4P-DSK 4 PPM LASER PALwm FOR PC($ 7 1,295,00 9,065.00 1,631,70 7,433,30 154,00 p,OO
LUP8II1-OSK 8 ?PM LASER PRINTER/PC/PCL V 3 2,395.00 7,185.00 :,293.30 5,891.10 120100 0,00
Raging
PC-SCAw1LV9 SNF.ET FEED SCRAM FOR 094KTgP L 3,300.00 3,300,00 1,256.00 2,046.00 40.00 0.00
CownonicAtion Hardware
8023-MPR 802.3 MOL:IPOIRT A]IPEATLA 1 3,000.00 3,000,00 660400 2,340.00 36.00 0.00
6023-MFW AUi TO RO-59 COWERTER FOR TIRE 6 3Cro.00 L, 000.00 396.00 1,404.00
r
16.00 0.00
UDLO90100 ETEEAR6T BDIT,8ERAH,t/402 LIR: 6 195.00 k, 170.00 0.00 1,170.00 18100 0.00
MDL999186 ETEEFVET IDMPS 10IRASE T ADFT 17 129. k'o 3,893,00 0.00 3 i
,84J.00 34,00 0,00
NOL999204 ETHErxET lGBIT,32EKAM,M/AUI, 1 250.00 250.00 O. CO 250.00 3.00 0.00
For he L1ghtSpaad Getaway
Software
MAIM VENTUFA 3,0 GOLD $ME$/ NTw 1 651.00 040 651.00 0.00 0100 0.00
L95-9619-t' WJk PERFECT MKS? STATION 1 260,00 260.00 11,00 160,0[1 0.00 0100
L95-6594-11 W4 *e&RFl:cr PAST: " 20 USMS 1 4,927,00 4,927,00 0.00 4,927.00 0,00 0.00
i
:95-6622-H Odr9JJL. 41L11PN7i .7 NODE 4 290,00 1,1.92,00 0.00 ,192.00 0.00 0,00
E
195-9554-+ Yi+l~`.F.Vl~ likV111CS 1--PST STATION 1 314.00 314.00 .,00 314.00 0,00 O, JO
C/M1AC'-3%N . r11Y 1 IANO :.GP.AL OFFI.:E CORM = 20 0 1 0 2
4i
00.00 56.00 14/.00 01„ 00 0,00
PC-0054-6 4^, r.;C4 OPERATIMG 5T5TEN 9/q 24 150,00 3, 600. JO 1,C06,00 2,592.00 0,00 0100
Other M4ng Produotr
` NOw-1402 1 1• V-1A MONO MC4n TOFF-q, 3,110V 18 245.00 4,410.00 1,615.00 £,134.20 0.00 0.00
I NOM-1414-us C"LCR. 90A NOwSTOR UNj-U 6 645,00 3,870.00 1,470.50 .,399.40 9.00 0,00
i
POO= COAL--.5 PG4E7..7ORD-US 6 0100 0100 0100 0100 0,00 V.00
J Systes, TotaLs 92, 8:6. ~0 ~6, 410.,30 67, C56, 20 I5M0
i
i
4
a Y
E~
Y.
•_IM
I
Model Number Orsorlptlon unit Uteoded
Otl Cosa: Cost _ aie00UAt
Net
-cost Naintrnance IAStitlletlon
sY3Tn{ 44- Ps•e!~ssir~nal Services -
consulting
3T-sup-10+0 CONSOLrMU 323tvIcts -
+o 125,00 s,ooo,oo 0.00 s.ooo.oo
9T-3TAP-1050 CGNS•J4TI11O 33MVIcts - 20 0.00 0.00
14U. 0(1 2,900.00 sec7lces/FduaatloA 0.00 7,x00.00 0.00
t
ED-CXS-PINPF MORDPKMCT 1 1
j~.. 105.00 185.00 0.00
r[ FY+-CRD -F.NPr MOWPP.RILCt 2 0.00
1 195.00 1e5.00 q,pq 1 85. 00 0.00
Ea-'Rg-P T1fPr MCRCPCRFCCT f5,0)i LEVEI. 7 1 :05.00 0.00 O.OD
185,00 185.00 0.D0 195.00
ED-CR3-v8S3A 113 9NA1,1, sISTEMB 0.00 0.00
l 750.00 780,00 0,00
NCTIwx A(M7IN NZTVARIr +IMISTRATIGN 750.00 0100 0.00
1 1,500,00 1,500.00 0.00 i.
ra-NOSO WUt3 JFFICB SYSTEM OPEPATICMS 1 1Y500 .00 0.00 0.90
500.00 500.00 D,dO SOC.00
Systems Totelt O. DO O,CO
11,105.00 11,1O5.J0
Quote Totelt 180,420,00 35 084.23
L10,096.67 1,281.50 2,310.10
FIA11S YeAA' S M71.-1t1L11ANcE $T, 155.00 pp
"MAL 41LI7fgU1}1[Y TuArA m $11,469.0n
I. ~
QtYD IF7R-lam YOLiL AN.= T>TI1pt-)y ~llra~lf;'7. i7
'e I
tt'
i ~
i
{
II
I
I
I
`t
k
4
DATE: 05/21/91
CITY COUNCIL ttRPORT FORMAT /
4
TO: Mayor and Membord of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell., City Manager
.3UILIECT: Rep #1202 WORD PROCE8SING SYBTEM REPLACEMENT
R~~OMhiEHDATION:
We reeonmiend thin HFP #1202 be awarded to Wang Laboratories Inc. In
the amount of $238,858.00.
SUMMARYt
y..
This requout for prvposal is for the lease purchase of Word
Proceseing equipment including hardware, software, maintenance,
lease costs, microfiche oapabilities and training. The equipment
will replace existing equipment that has been in use for over 10
years and has become obsolete due to technology improvements acid
heavy use.
For additional information please referenoa the Word Processing j
System Replacement Report submitted at the work session of May 21,
1991.
B C GROUND:
Memorandum to Lloyd Harrell, City Manager from Gary Collins,
Director of Information Services dated May 140 1991 and the Word
Processing System Replacement Report.
Pi~00Ft~191, AEPAR'PNENTS tlN UR UP AV2KCTKD:
Information Services, Word processing Center and the other
departments and divisions that, utilize their services as well as the
Customer Service Division of the Finance Department.
FIS L f1~~~A~~:
Funds for the acquisition of this equipment will come from current
budget funds for maintenance of existing equipment in the amount of
$230494.00 and an additional $24,000.00 from Customer Service
Special 8orvioee (microfi(jhe) budget funds. Funds over the five
year period for those servioes would be $263,436.00.
These aocounto total sufficient dollars to make monthly payments
without i.nereasus to baseline budgets.
This is a five year lease purchase acquisition. Monthly payments
will remain unchanged and proper funding out or non-appropriation
clauses are wr.ittnn into the contract should funds become no longer
available.
3369L
j
p
f
r~ `7
P
1
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
MAY 21, 1991
PAVE 2 OF 2
Respe fully Submitted:
- - -
Lloyd V, Harrell
City Manager'
r
Approved:
\
Name: Tom D, Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Purohasing Agent
TSljh
159.DOC
f
t
:i
ewpdocsfeesord
ORDINANCE NO. '
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING POR THE SAVING OF ESTABLISHED FEES AUTH-
ORIZED TO BE COLLECTED PURSUANT TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; PROVIDING THAT A SCHEDULE OF FEES SHALL BE
MAINTAINED ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY; AND PRO-
VIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Counctl of the City of Denton, Texas, has
adopted and enacted a new Code of Ordinances for the City of
Denton, Texas, and desires to save from repeal all fees currently
authorized and established, including but not limited to, license
fees, permit fees, and administrative fees NOW, THEREFORE,
w
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSs
SECTION I. That the following schedule of Fees establishes the '
amount of any fee included therein to be collected pursuant to the
specified provisions of the Code of Ordinances:
SCHEDULE OF FEES 1
Sec. 3-86 Advertising flight permit $10.00 per flight
Sec. 3-89 Term Advertising flight permit $25.00
(Term not to exceed 6 months)
Sec. 4-62 Alarm Systems-False alarm fee
Burglary $ 50.00 each false
alarm exceeding
3 for 12 months
Fire $ 75.00 each false
alarm exceeding
3 for 12 months
Robbery $ 75.00 for first
false alarm,
$100.00 for second
false alarm,
$200,00 for third
false alarm,
$200.00 for fourth
false alarm,
$200.00 for fifth
false alarm
during 12 mos.
Medical Emergency $ 50.00 for each false
alarm
f w
h4j
f
3
i
F
t
Sec, 6-23 prohibited Animal permit fee $ 10.00
Sec. 6-31 Dog & Cat registration fee $ 6.00 annually
$ 4.00 annually,
if unable to
procreate
Sec, 6-31 Lost Dog ar Cat registration tag $ 1.00
Sea, 6-31 Dog or Cat adoption fee $ 10.00
Sec. 6-76 Animal impound fees
(1) Class A Animals (Dogs and Cats, fowl, each
animal.)
First Impoundment $ 15.00
Second Impoundment $ 22,50
Third Impoundment $ 33.75
Fourth Impoundment $ 50.00
(2) Class H Animals (Goats, sheep, lambs, pigs,
sows, shoats, calves, foals, and animals of
the same approximate size and weight, each
animal.)
First Impoundment $ 20.00
Second Impoundment $ 30.00
Third Impoundment $ 45.00
Fourth Impoundment $ 67,E-0
(3) Class C Animals (Cattle, mules, horses,
ponies, and animals of the same ;approximate
size and weight, each animal.)
First Impoundment $ 25,00
Second Impoundment $ 37.50
Third Impoundment $ 56.25
Fourth Impoundment $ 84.50
(4) Class D Animals (Prohibited, exotic, or wild
animals requiring capture by center personnel
(i.f animal already contained, then same as
Class B, each animal)),
First Impoundment $ 25,00
Second Impoundment $ 37.50
Third Impoundment $ 56.25
Fourth Impoundment $ 84,50
E
PAGE 2
s. - 1P +.r\
i
~ r
v
0
is
a gf
r r
I
Sec. 6-76
Reduction Of Impound Fee
$ 3.00
Sec. 6-76 Daily Handling fee
Class A Animal $ 2.00
Class B Animal
Class C Animal $ 2.00
Class 0 Animal $ 3.00
$ 3.0o
Sec, 6 Animal euthanasia fees
Resident $ 10.00
Non-resident $ 15.00 `i
Sec. 6-35 Dead Animal disposal fee
I City pick-up of animal $ 0.50 per pound
Animal brought to Animal
control Center
$ 3. 00 per trip -
Sec, 6-89 Protected Migratory Bird
Roost Administrative fee
S 80.00
Sec. 24-12 Removal of Heavy or Unusual
Accumulation of Discarded
Household Items $ 10,00
Sec. 24-69 Private Garbage Hauler
Annual Permit $ 50.00
See, 14-113 Swimming Pools
Public and Semi-public
Permits
$160.00
Sea. 28-347 Building Moving Fee
greater of 1 1/4
•ents per std, ft.
or $30.00
Sec. 28-328 Building moving damage deposit $300.00
Refund of deposit on non.
issuance lest processing fee of $ 15,00
Sec. 28-20 Building demolition permit
Residential structure
Commercial structure $ 50.00
$ 50.00
Sec. 28-378 Fence construction permit
$ 15.00
PAGE 3
{3
Sec. 25-158 Sale of Cemetery Lots-Adult $350.00
Sale of Cemetery Lots-Infant $ 75.00
Concrete work permit $ 25.00
Interment permit $ 25.00
Sec. 25-160 Application permit for burial $ 10.00
Sec. 25-161 Concrete work permit $ 10.00
Sec. 28-111 Temporary Electrical Work Permit $ 2.00
Sec. 28-116 Registration of Other City's
Electrical License $ 10.00
Sec. 28-113 Electrician's Examination &
License Fees
master electrician $100.00
Class A & B journeyman $ 20.00
Electrician's Renewal Fee
Master electrician $ 20.00
Class A & B journeyman $ 5.00
Sec. 28-114 Late charge on renewals $ 25.00
Sec. 28-117 Electrical Contractor's $ 80.00
License Fee
Renewal fee $ 80.00
Sec. 27-102 Emergency Service Provided by Fare Department;
Fees r i
Emergency ambulance service
fees from any location to a
hospital $120.00 per
f person
! From any Denton location
to a Dallas or Fort Worth
hospital $300.00 per
person
Additional fees:
02 $ 3.5.00
IV's $ 15.00
Additional bags $ 10.00
Mast trousers $ 25.00
Monitor/Defibrillator $ 25.00
Nitrous Oxide $ 25.00
PAGE 4
2
p
$ 25.00
Drugs $ 25.00
Thumper $ 25.00
Dressing tray
Sec, 2-127 Reques'. for abandonment of public
easement or rights-of-way $100.00
Application Fee
Sec. 2-157 Library Cards
no charge
Resident $ ll.oo annually
Non-resident
$ 10.00
Sec. 16-93 Solicitor's Permit
Sec. 1e-127 Suspension of parking $ 5.00 per day
/-1 Meter spaces per spares
Fee $ 80.00
sec. 20-72 Abatement Grass Administratione and
sec. 25-8 A`,,atement of Debris on
Public Streets $ 50.00
Administrative fee r
Sea. 18-100 Loading zones
Permit fee $150.00
Renewal fee $ 75.00
Reapplication fee $150.00
(if late renewal)
service Permit $ 25.00 annually a
Sec. 23-96 Towing
sec. 23-87 Maximum Fees for Towing Service
(1) Days, nights, weekends and
holiday towing of automo-
biles, vans, pickup trucks, $ 40.00
and motorcycles J
(2) Responding to tow request
by police department where
no hookup is madet no charge
and that tow service will be
returned to first place the list.
PAGE 5
E
%i
i
d
(3) use of dolly in towing
wrecked motor vehicles $ 20.00 plus
towing charge
(4) Tow involving extraordinary
labor and expensesf the
above maximum amount may be
exceeded if unusual and extra-
ordinary circumstances occur at
the scene of an emergency.
Sec. 25-6 Street and Sidewalk Vendor's
Permit $ 25.00 C
plus $10.00 for
each vehicle in
excess of one
and $5.U0 for
each employee
in excess of one
Sec. 26-3 Utility connection Fee $ 10.00
utility Transfer Fee $ 10.00
Reconnect Fee $ 20.00 1
Sec. 26.76 Private Lighting Luminaries
(a) self-contained automatic
Dusk-to-Dawn 175 Watts
Mercury Vapor Lighting
Fixture $ 3.75 per month
(b) 250 Watts Fixture $ 4.50 per month
(c) 400 Watts Fixture $ 5.75 per month
Additional Poles where required $ 65.00 each
Sec. 26-202 Industrial/COmmeraial Waste-
water Discharge Permit $ 25.00
t
Sea. 26-191 Wastewater Discharge from
Transport Truck Permit $ 50.00
Sec. 26-126 Water and Sewer Tapping and Other Fees
Tap and Loop Installation Inspection
Fee $100.00
Loop Installation Inspection Fee $ 35.00
PAGE 6
a
it
1
1
I
T.
Installations Performed by Utility Department
Water Taps With Loop
Size of 'yap & ter P ved t eet Un av_Qd Street
3/4 inch $ 785 $400
2 inch $ 835 $435
1-1/2 inch $1,060 $700
2 inch $1,185
$785
Water Taps Without Loop
Size of Tam t r Paved street Unpaved Street
2 inch $ 810 $400
Water Loops
3/4 inch $235
1 inch $275
1-1/2 inch $400
Sewer Taps With cleanout
Size of Tan Paved treefi
_ ` Unaave,. St ,S &t
4 inch $710 $335
6 inch $735 $360
8 inch $775 $400
20 inch $835 $435
Meter Relocations
S -L-Qf TAP-And Meter a ocatic~ of SO Feed e8
3/4 inch $ 50
1 inch $ 75
1-1/2 inch $ 75
2 inch $100
Fees for Installations Not Listed;
1. Any person requesting the installation of a tap or loop
by the utility department for which a fee is not speci-
fied shall pay in advance to the utility department a
deposit based upon the estimated cost of such installa-
tion, or similar work, plus an administration charge of
twenty porcent (20*).
PAGE 7
AIM
a 1~
4i
ti
i
2. Upon completio>> of the installation or similar work
requested, th(i applicant shall be billed at actual
cost, as determined by the utility department, plus a
twenty percent (20*) administrative charge. Any excess
deposit shall be refunded to the applicant.
Tapping Fees in Addition to Other Fees and Charges
The fees and charges established herein shall be in addi-
tion to any other applicable fees and charges provided by
ordinance. Any person, association of persons, or corpo-
ration requesting the city to perform related services for
which a fee has not been set shall be charged the City's
cast for providing such work, service, material, and
equipment plus twenty percent (20%).
sec. 26-128 Adjustment Rate on Excess water and Sewer Usage
Water $ 0.70 per thousand gallons
Sewer $ 0.50 per thousand gallons
Sec. 27-30 Bus Rate Fare Not more than $0.25 per
passenger transported
from one point to another
point within the city
Sec. 27-69 Taxicab License and Inspection Fees $100.00
annually
per taxi-
cab
j Fee to Duplicate Lost
Taxicab License $ 5.00
f
Sec. 28-274 Mechanical Code Board Appeal
to Plumbing and Mechanical Code
Board $ 50.00
See. 32-63 Mobile Nome & Travel $205,00
Trailer Park license fee plus $4,10
for each
stand in
the park
Sec. 33-123 Storage fee on Impounded Signs $ 25.00 foil
transport-
ing sign,
plus $1.00
per day for
storage
PAGE 8
r
trfL~i
Sec. 33124 Administrative Fee on Non-
redeemed Signs $ 50.00
SECTION III, That the City Secretary is directed to maintain a
schedule of Fees as adopted herein and as from time to time may be
established by the City Council in the Office of the City
Secretary.
SECzJION III. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval.
G
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1991.
BOB CAS'TLEBERRY, MAYOR
P~
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALfTERS, CITY SECRETARY
I~
r=
BY: -
i
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY t``
t
PAGE 9
k
1
t
s
}CITY
COUNCIL,
J
}
1.
f
j
i
1
1
I
I
oooO~QQQ0o000 c p~0w.
ro Op- f
n
0°°°°0aoaaaccuaQ~°°v~
Y1.
r
na~
t
:
it
~j
I A
q 00
May 21, 1991
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM, Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDER CONTRACT REVISIONS FOR TEMPORARY
REDUCTION IN DEMAND
RECOMMENDATION
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of May
15, 1991, recommended to the City Council increasing
the incentive payment from $18/KW to $24/KW to
customers who successfully complete the voluntary load
reduction program. The Board also recommends the
delelopment of an alternative contract for the Denton
Indopendent School District , This contract would have
an incentive payment of $12/KW and would not require
the ~"Iustomer to shed load until 3:00 p.m. on those days
that the program is implemented.
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND
The purpose of the voluntary load reduction program is
to reduce the Utility's peak demand for power. By so
doing, the system load factor is improved and fixed
costs from Texas Municipal Power Agency (TMPA) are customers
can interrupt
during reduprovided ced
TMPA ecities.
summer loads n than can
The utility contracts with several of its large
customers who are capable of shedding load. (minimum of
100KW) upon two hours notice. On those days when the
load curve and the outdoor temperatures are such that a
peak demand for power could be established, the utility
agrees to contract participating customers by noon and
the customers agree to reduce their load between the
hours of 2:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. The program is in
effect during the months of July, August and September.
On the completed to the billing, candomfulfilleda all successfully
obligations are granted by multiplying the $/KW times
the number of KW reduced on the day of the customer's
second worst performance.
JJ♦
rr.^
~hr
1
t
Page 2
CC AGENDA ITEM
This program has been extremely successful in the past.
For the summer of 1990, eight customers representing 16
accounts signed up for the program. Eleven accounts
were credited in October. Total load reduction was
8,872 KW. Credit; totalled $104,652. Based on TMPA
charges of $110/KW, net savings to the City was
$871,268 (see Attachment #1).
PROGRAMS;/DEPARTMENTS/GROUPS AFFECTED
City Council, Public Utilities Board, Utility
Department, Participating Customers, all customers.
FISCAL IMPACT
Unknown at present. Based on last summer's
performance, total credits would increase by $34,884 to
$139,536. Net savings would be reduced by an equal
amount.
Respectfully submitted,
i
Llodyyyd . H arrell, C ty Man ger
C
I
Prepared bys
ieha d Fo ter, Ener y ;
Information Speoia
Approved byi
.E. Nelson, E ecutive Director
Department of Utilities
Exhibit I Load Reduction Information
II Proposed Agreement
171 Minutes PUB Meeting of 5/15/91
LDRFDUC.515 #18
t .
s Es
~f
l I
II
I
5
F
I~
l
Attachment 11
1990 Voluntary Load Reduction Program
'90 KW '90 KW
REDUCED REDUCED 190
CUSTOMER ACCOUNT 4 (AT PEAK) 1. (PER ::ONTRACT)2' 1 3'
UNT 254-0597-1-01 11837 1,191 21,456
UNT 254-0601-1-01 802 401 1,218
Morrison Milling 374-0306-3-01 89 59 0
Acme Brick 3884214-1-01 11119 1,434 25,812
FEMA 385-0311-2-01 233 323 5,814
D'.SD - Strickland 254-0595-1-01 110 39 0
DISD Calhoun 254-0331-0-01 87 20 0
DISD - A1cNaIr 411-0729-2-03 39 323 51814
DISD - Hodge 411-0836-2-01 67 48 0
DISD - Evers 402-0370-1-01 33 173 31114
DISD - High School 254-0571-1-01 288 108 11944
TWU 254-0141-2-01 2,324 702 12,636
TWU 254-0155-1-01 117 7 0
COD: Raw Water 402-0165-1-01 998 450 8,100
COD: Water Plant 402-0163--1-01 447 392 7,056
COD: W/Water 400-0008-1-01 282 316 5)688
TOTALS 8,872 5,987 $104,652
i
1' Peak occurred at 5;00 p.m, on Thursday, August 30. KW reduced (at peak) Is
the difference between the customer's park load for August 30 and their
actual load at :00
5 .m, on that day. Thls ma
be greater, or less,
p Y than li
the KW reduction per the contract.
2' As per the contract, the customer must reduce load by at least 100 KW to
recelve credit,
3. For customers who reduce their load by at least 100 KW, credit Is calculat-
ed at $18/KW (as per contract).
i
w
ID2/010391073/2
f
r
€1
i
w
Attachment Hl (continued)
Cost per KW reduced:
5104,552 dollars paid 511.80/KW reduced at peok
8,872 KW reduced at peak '
Savings;
8,872 KW reduced
x 5110/KW (171PA charge)
5975,920 (gross savings)
$975,920 (gross savings)
-5104,652 Cdollars pald to customers)
5871,2G8 (net savings)
1
t
f
j
f
s
S
G
I
i
{
1D2/010391073/3
s .
Y
iJ
f
i
2336L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES TO EXECUTE
CONTRACTS WITH ELECTRIC UTILITY CUSTOMERS TO REDUCE ELECTRICAL
POWER DEMAND; AUTHORIZING CREDITS ON UTILITY BILLS FOR
CUSTOMERS WHO EXECUTE SUCH CONTRACTS; AND PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas
hereby finds that the reduction of consumption of peak electric
power serves a public purpose by allowing the City Lo postpone
{ the construction of additional generation facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, aging upon the recommendation I
of City staff and the Public Utility Board, desires to reduce
electrical power demand by the customers of the City of Denton
Utilities; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the offering of
electric utility bill credit incentives to customers who agree
to reduce peak demand upon request by the City would reduce
electric demand and the efficient utilization of the City's
existing electric power utility system would be enhanced; NOW,
THEREFORE, -
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS;
SECTION I. That based upon the findings set forth in the
pream_bTe`~iereof, the City Council hereby authorizes the City
Manager to establish a program to
provide
$2 bill
incentives at a rate not to exceed twenty-fourtdollarsl(ity
per kw demand to City of Denton customers who execute contracts
a
conditions uthorizing the City to interrupt power under the terms and
of the July, contracts,
authorized fortheomonths in
t
year.
and h September of beach
Executive Director
UtilitiesONs That the
such contracts Electric on
behalf of the City,
I SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective
imme ate y upon ita passage and approval.
s^
rr - '
a
r;
I
PASSE] AND APPROVED this the day of , 1991.
B CKSTLEBERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST;
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
j
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORIM: t
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
i
1.4
j
~r
i
W' L
AGREEMENT FOR
TEMPORARY REDUCTION IN DEMAND
The City of Denton, Texas, a Home Rule City situated in Denton
County, Texas, hereinafter called "CITY", acting herein by and
through its Executive Director of Utilities, Robert E. Nelson and
whose address is
ere nafter called CUS O'IER," hereby mutua y agree as o ows:
1. APPLICATION: This Agreement is applicable only when CUS-
TOMER r.ece` - ves service during the months of July, August and
September, 1991, when service is subject to load reductions of a
minimum of one-hundred KW (100KW) upon two hours notification by i
telephone by CITY'S Representative.
The CITY and CUSTOMER have determined the estimated peak
loads for the months of July, August and September, 1991, for
CUSTOMER to be as follows:
Peak Demand: KW
Address:
2. DEFINITIONS: The following definitions shall apply to this
Agreement:
Y
Peak KW Demand: The actual or estimated peak KW usage,
whichever is greater, for the months of July, August and
September, 1991, based on historical billing records plus esti-
mates of changes in load, equipment, etc.
Maximum Demand Durin Reduction: Customer's maximum (or
peak) deman that occurs during reduction(s) requested by the
City.
Demand Reduction; Peak KW Demand less Maximum Demand Dur-
ing Keduct on.
Utilit 's Peak Da : The day on which the maximum KW de-
mand i.s p ace on the entire electrical system.
3. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED: The City has a public interest
in reduc ng the system pea in order to maximize the effi-
ciency of its utility system and thus, agrees to pay CUSTOMER
twenty-four ($24.00) dollars per KW demand for a one time reduc-
tion of at least one-hundred KW (100 KW) during the months of
July, August and September, 1991. CUSTOMER calculates the Maxi-
mum Estimated Reduction in Demand to be an estimated
KW. The actual reduction shall based upon measurements aETen Ty
city's representative.
CITY agrees to monitor its system load and determine if a
reduction in peak KW is required. CITY shall notify CUSTOMER by
H
1
a
telephone not later than twelve noon of a defy if such reduction is
required during that day. CUSTOMER agrees to acknowledge such
request and reduce its load for that day between the hours of 2:00
o'clock p.m. and 7:00 o'clock p.m.
4. GENERAL BILLING INFORMATION: CUS'T'OMER will, be charged ac-
cording to t e cF`e`nt rate sc a ule applicable 4o the CUSTOMER
for the months of July, August and September, 1991. A credit
shall be applied to CUSTOMER'S October, 1991 bill which shall be
calculated as follows: >
Peak KW Minimum Demand July-September, 1991 KW
LESS Maximum Demand During Reduction(s) xx )KW
(
Total Demand Reduction xx KW
x $24.00
Total Credit: $ xx.xx
5. MISCELLANEOUS: CUSTOMER is granted a one-time exemption
whereby need not reduce demand by at least 100 KW from
its peak KW demand. If the CUSTOMER'S one-time exemption is the
Utility's Peak Day, this contract becomes void and shall terminate
immediately. If the CUSTOMER fails, when requested, to reduce its
peak demand more than 100 KW on more than one occasion, this
Agreement becomes void.
5. TERM: This Agreement is in effect for the period begin-
ning Jul-y-T, 1991 and ending at midnight, September 30, 1991.
EXECUTED this day of , 1991.
CUSTOMER CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
~amC? BY:
151
A ress DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES
ty tate p o e
`fie ep one um er
Tccount um er
Meter Number
Contact erson
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCfi, CITY ATTORNEY
BYE
i
-,,•4
F~
2951L
AGREEMENT FOR
TEMPORARY REDUCTION IN DEMAND
The City of Denton, Texas, a Rome Rule City situated in Denton
County, Texas, hereinafter called "CITY", acting herein by and
through its Executive Director of Utilities, Robert E. Nelson and
, whose address is
hereinafter ca eY Cl"OMER," hereby mutually agree as follows:
1. APPLICATION: This Agreement is applicable only when
CUSTOMER rues service during the months of July, August and
September, 1991, when service is subject to load reductions of a
minimum of one-hundred KW (10OKW) upon two hours notification by i
telephone by CITY'S Representative.
The CITY and CUSTOMER have determined the estimated peak
loads for the months of July, August :ind September, 1991, for
CUSTOMER to be as follows:
Peak Demand: KW
Addres;a:
2. DEFINITIONS: The following definitions shall apply to this
Agreement: x
Peak KW Demand: The actual or estimated peak KW usage,
whichever is greater, for the months of July, August and
September, 1991, based on historical billing records plus
estimates of changes in load, equipment, etc.
Maximum Demand D~urrinngReduction: Customer's maximum (or
peak) deman-6-W tTiat occurs during red ction(s) requested by the
city.
Demand Reduction: Peak KW Demand less Maximum Demand Dur-
ing Reduct on.
Utiil~li_~__t~__yy__'s Peak Da : The day on which the maximum KW
demand T p~ae on t He entire electrical system.
3. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED: The City has a public interest
in reduc ng the system peak-RW in order to maximize the effi-
ciency of its utility system and thus, agrees to pay CUSTOMER
twelve ($12.00) dollars per KW demand for a one time reduction of
at least one-hundred KW (100 KW) during the months of July,
August and September, 1991. CUSTOMER calculates the Maximum
Estimated Reduction in Demand to be an estimated KW.
15
The actual reduction shall based upon measuremen s to en by
city 'a representative.
CITY agrees to monitor its system load and determine if a
reduction in peak KW is required. CITY shall notify CUSTOMER by
Y
r
f~
y
telephone not later than twelve noon of a day if such reduction
is required during that day. CUSTOMER agrees to acknowledge such
request and reduce its load for that day between the hours of
3:00 o'clock p.m. and 7:00 o'clock p.m.
4. GENERAL BILLING INFORMATION: CUSTOMER will be charged
according to the current rate sc a ule applicable to the CUSTOMER
for the months of July, August and September, 1991. A credit
shall be applied to CUSTOMER'S October, 1991 bill, which shall be
calculated as follows:
Peak KW Minimum Demand July-September, 1991 KW
LESS Maximum Demand During Reduction(s) ( xx )KW
Total Demand Reduction xx KW
x $12.00
Total Credit: $ xx.xx
5. MISCELLANEOUS: CUSTOMER is granted a one-time exemption
whereby-CUSTOMER need not reduce demand by at least 100 KW from
its peak KW demand. If the CUSTOMER'S one-time exemption is the
Utility's Peak Day, this contract becomes void and shall terminate j
immediately. If the CUSTOMER fails, when requested, to reduce its
peak demand more than 100 KW on more than one occasion, this
Agreement becomes void.
6. TERM: This Agreement is in effect for the period begin-
ning July L, 1991 and ending at midnight.. September 30, 1991.
EXECUTED this day of , 1991.
CUSTOMER CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
(Name) -
, EXRUTIVE
DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES
Address
City/State/Zip Code---'
Telephone Number
Account Number
eter Number
Contact Person
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
PAGE 2
V
I
~ A
MEMORANDUM
TOi BETTY McKEAN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
MUNICIPAL SERVICES & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
FROM: JOF,LI,A ORR, LIBRARY DIRECTOR
SU13J1 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ENDORSEMENT OF TEXAS LIBRARY ASSOCIATION
RESOLUTION
DATE: May 15, 1991 i
i
To date, the $51,000 out frorl the Texas State Library appropriation due to the
Legislative Budget Board's recommendation has not been replaced for the
Statewide Library Development Program for Fiscal Year 1992/93. The State must
do so to meet the maintenance-of-effort requirement to preserve $4.9 million
in library services and Construction Act Title I Funding (Federal Funds),
Your assistance in encouraging our City Council to endorse the Texas Library
Association's Resolution or in sending a letter will. be greatly appreciated.
The expression of our City Council's support of this Resolution 3hoLld be
I
forwarded to:
John T. Mont£ord
r Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee
P. 0. Box 12068
Austin, TX 78711
and
Jim Rudd
Chairman of the House Appropriations Committee
P, O. Box 2910
Austin, TX 78768-2910
Thank you.
11'~ I
~OELL7 ORR
JO Iis
2068H
,:A
I~
lib.r
t
G
RESOLUTION NO. _
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE TEXAS LIBRARY ASSOCIATION'S REQUEST FOR
THE ADDITION OF $51,000 TO THE LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOAP.D RECOMMENDA-
TION FOR THE STATEWIDE LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR 1992-93, TO MEET THE MAINTENANCE-OF-EFFORT REQUIREMENT
PRESERVING $4.9 MILLION IN LIBRARY SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION ACT
TITLE I FUNDING; AND 'PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, public irbraries are an important adjunct to the
educational system of the State; and
WHEREAS, public libraries are a front line defense against
functional illiteracy; and
WHEREAS, public libraries, including the Denton Public Library,
utilize Library Services and Construction Act Title I funding for
interlibrary Loan services to obtain materials not in their collec-
tions,
WHEREAS, without Library Services and Construction Act Title I
funds, many public libraries in the Texas State Library System,
including the Denton Public Library, would be unable to deliver the
same quality of services to the public; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES:
SECTION I. That the City of Denton, Texas, supports the Texas
Library Association's request that $51,000 be added to the Legisla-
tive Budget Uoard recommendation for the Statewide Library Develop-
ment Program for the fiscal year 1992-93 in order to meet the main-
tenance-of-effort requirement for State funding and preserve $4.9
million in Library Services and Construction Act Title I.
gECTION II. That the resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1991.
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
t
yy4
sr+'!
v`
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
_
BY.
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: f
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCR, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:( 1
i
I
f
i
i
PAGE 2
k=
~r
CITY COUNCIE,pORT FORM/-T DATE: 5/21/91
TO: Mayor and Members of tho City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJ: Approval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager
to sign and submit to the Department of Housing and
Urban Development a 1991 Final Statement of Objectives
and Projected Use of Funds.
ECO ENDATTQN:
CDBG Committee recommends approval.
BAQ G{ UND:
i"
Public hearings were held to gain citizen input/
suggestions on the use of CDBG funds. Proposals from
City staff and citizen groups were received by the CDOG
Committee. Hearings were held on those proposals
meeting CDBG criteria.
fo-0- RY: The Final Statement reflects projects/program
recommendations presented to City Council at the
May 7, 1991 work session.
~QL~AMS _ D~PARTM T U3...Q.QL p
CDBG Staff will admiiniss-ter'aiTyp
will prepare specifications fortheeWilson BSt~ Sidewalk
project Martin Luther King Jr. Recreation Center staff
will carry out Kid Connection Program. HOPE, inc., the
Prenatal Clinic and the Denton Housing Authority (TWU
CARES) will execute contracts with the City for funding
under the CDBG Program.
FISCAL IMPACT;
There will be no impact on the general fund.
Res Pe tfully eub fitted:
Llo d Harrell
City Manager
E
f1
f1
ii
Prepared by:
Barbara Ross
Community Development Coordinator
Approv
Fran Robbins AICP
Uecutive Director for Planning & Development
t, l
'i
t 01\WP00051hou9r
RESOLUTION N0,
A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO SIGN AND SUBMIT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT A FINAL STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF
FUNDS WITH APPROPRIATE CERTIFICATIONS, AS AUTHORIZED AND REQUIRED
BY THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974, AS AMENDED;
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas, is concerned with the
development of viable urban communities, including decent hous-
ing, a suitable living environment and expanded economic oppor-
tunities; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas, has a special concern for
persons of low and moderate incomes and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas, as an entitlement City, has
I prepared, through a citizen participation process, a program for
utilizing its eighth year entitlement funds in the approximate
amount of $637,568; and
WHEREAS, the public hearings will have been held in accordance
with the lawt and pi
WHEREAS, the Act requires an application and appropriate certi-
fication; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTONt
SEC-_T0 That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
authorizes the City Manager to sign and submit to the Department of
Housing and Urban Development a rant assurances for entitlement funds under pthle Housing nandpcommunity
Development Act of 1974, as amended,
S T 0 That the City Council of the city of Denton,
Texas, authorizes the Executive Director of Planning and Devel-
opment to handle all fiscal and administrative matters related to
the application, the Housing Assistance Plan and the assi;rances,
agg
TTON Irr, That the City Secretary is hereby authorized to
furnish copies of ti,is resolution to all interested parties.
CTiON v, That this resolution shall take effect immediately
from and after its passage,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
t ~r 1991.
BOB- CAS'TLEBERRY, MAYOR
r-' W--w- - - t--w
l~
l
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY:
APPRUJED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
y
i
t
{
I t
E
PACE 2
0
}
tj
!1
n
' a
FINAL STATEMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES
AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS
The objective of the City of Denton's Community Development Block Grant
Program is to support activities which are directed toward the specific
objective of development of viable urban communities by providing decent
housing, a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunity,
principally for persons of low and moderate income. The City anticipates
receiving approximately $637,568 for its 1991 program year. Proposed
activities and objectives are as follows:
1. Housing Rehabilitation $313,516.00
Continuation of the existing program to rehabilitate substandard houses
inhabited by low or moderate income persons living in the City.
Objective: To bring existing housing into compliance with housing code
and arrest deteriorating neighborhoods in the target area.
Location: City of Denton
Census Tract's 208-BG 40 207, 209-BG 1 & 2, 2100 208--BG 1 & 2,
214, 213-BG 11 2120 206.020 206.01-BG 11 2, 3, 4, and 5,
204.03-BG 2, 204.02-BG 41 205.01-BO 5
2. Housing Assistance Program $66,516.00
City--wide program to provide assistance to £irat-time home buyers in the
following areas: r
A. Minimum down payment required.
B. Closing costs.
C. Pre-paid insurance and escrow.
D. Pre-paid property taxes.
9. Pre-paid interest.
Funds will be available to low/moderate income families. Assistance is
originated as a second mortgage running concurrently with the first.
Objective: To provide affordable housing for low and moderate income
families.
Location- City of Denton,
Census Tract's 208-BG 4, 207, 209-BO 1 & 21 210, 208-BO 1 & 20
214, 213-BG 1, 212, 206.02, 206.01-BG 1, 2, 3, h, and 5,
204.63-BO 2, 204.02-BO 41 205.01-DG 5
3. MLK Kid Connection Program $15063.00
A drop-in after school program for children ages 7-12. Supervision and
activities to be provided in gymnasium, game room, arts and crafts room,
for a maximum of 50 children. Program will also provide supervision for
children eight hours per day during Christmas Break, Spring Break, Teacher
rs
Proposed Statement
Page 2
Work Days, and other holidays. Program will
provide supervioed environment for uhlldren from low/moderate in omeafamiliesvin
the neighborhood.
Objective: Improvement of public services provided to low and moderate
income residents.
Location: 1200 Wilson St., Denton, Texe7,
Census Tract 212
4. Hope, Inc. Transitional Housing Program $24,960.00
Pilot program to assist homeless or potentially homeless families toward
establishing and maintaining self-sufficiency. Provision of rent and
utility assistance as well as other finanalal aid. Assistance will be
provided to two (2) or three (3) families for a period of twelve (12) to
twenty-four (24) months. Pilot study families will also be aaaisted with
assessment of educational or vocational skills and training, budget '
skills, job skills, counseling or other social services.
Objective: Improvement of public eerviaes provided to low and moderate
income residents.
Location: 1213 Locust, Denton, Texas
Census Tract 206.01
51 Denton County Prenatal Clinic $249500.00
Provision of prenatal care for low income women from Denton County. Fnnds
will be used to pay a portion of the salary for an additional
nurse-midwife.
j
Objective: Improvement of public services provided to low and moderate
o income residents.
Location: 123 Piner, Donton, Texas
Census Tract 20T
6. TWU Ceres $259040.00
Provision of basic health and dental care for low income residents of
Denton, Staff provides individual care, referrals, prescriptiono,
evaluations and health/dental education. Clinic is a joint project of the
Denton Housing Authority and Texas Woman's University.
Objective: The improvement of public aervicee provided to low and
moderate income residents.
Location: 308 South Rudell, Denton, Texas
Census Tract 212
td'
1l
Proposed Statement
Page 3
7. Wilson Street Sidewalks $270500.00
Construction of midewalke along Wilson Street from Ruddell Street to
Bradshaw Street. Project will provide safe access to children traveling
from MLK Center and Phoenix Apartments to Fred Moore Park,
Objective: To upgrade infrastruoture in the targeted area as a part ~1
the process to stabilize neighborhoods.
Location: Wilson Street, Denton, Texas
Census Tract 212
8. Demolition and Lot Clearance $15,000.00
Continuation of the 1984-85 t`
program struotures that conibute demoliethe anddeteremove vt,
rioration Hof
neighborhoods,
Objective: To eliminate spot areas of slum and blight particularly in
low/moderate income areas,
Location: City of Denton
Census Traot's 208-BO 4, 207, 209•-EL' 1 & 2, 210, 208-B0 1 & 2,
2140 213-80 It 212, 206,020 206.01-BG 1, 20 3, 41 and 5,
204.03-B0 2, 204.02-BO 4, 205.01-BC 5
8, Administration $127,513.00 t
Program management, coordination, monitoring, and evaluation associated
with carrying out eligible grant activities. Including: staff salaries;
office equipment and supplies; office rent, maintenance, and utilities;
administration of rental rehabilitation, emergency shelter grant,
monitoring of Social Agencies.
1
s
i
i
3626)
(
ti
a
CITY of DENTON
Community Development Office
110 west Oak, suite B
Denton, Taxes 76201
(817) 686.8480
MI~IvICDYZAlM131 (i7M
i
Date: play lv, 1991
TO., Dlayov and hfembcrs of the City council
From: Barbara Ross, Community Developrnent Coordinator
Subject., Community Development Administration Budget
i
r
11
Attached is a draft of the administration budget for Lhe Community
Development Program for the 1991-92 fiscal year. Department of !lousing and
Urban Development regulations place a 20% cap on administration expenditures.
At the end of each C.D. fiscal year (July 31) any residual administration funds
F are transferrer) to the /lousing Rehabilitation Program for use on rehabilitation
projects.
i
i Community Development administrative functions include the following.
Preparation and administration of Community Development
budget.
Adminlstration of Human Services Budget.
Financial and programmatic monitoring of the /lousing
Rehabilitation program including application, contract
and payrnent processing.
Development and implementation of the Housing Assistance
Program including development of guldelfnes, applica-
tion, client sereenin and !
i g property vcrrualion.
Development and administration of Fair Housing 1'1•092am,
enforcement of ordinance including complaint processing
mediation anct referral to HUD if necessary.
In The American Tradition
'/Tie Community Development Block Urant
Meeting needs at home,
In the family.
and throughout the neighborhood,
f '
r.
~I
it
Preparation of F,nvironmental Review record and monitoring
of compliance svith regulations in all of the following
areas,, floodplain ordinance, historic properties,
noise abatement, hazardous materials, runway clear zones,
fish and wildlife.
Administration of Demolition Program funded through CDBG,
Preparation of all required federal and state reports
necessary to maintain program compliance and eligibility,
e.g. Comprehensive (lousing Affordability Strategy,
Grantee Performance Report, Federal Transactions Report,
etc.
Monthly reconciliation of accounting records and prepara-
tion of draw on letter of credit.
Monitoring, of all rehabilitation loan accounts (projected
91-92 income of $ 20,000).
Implementation and monitoring of all CDBG capital improve-
ment projects including enforcement of all federal wage
and labor standards, payment to contractors and coordina-
lion with Engineering Department.
!I Subrecipient monitoring to ensure contract compliance and
compliance with CDDG financial regulations and beneficiary
requirements.
Administration of Rental Rehabilitation Program (partial
administration funded through program).
Application to and administration of various other grant
programs including Emergency Shelter Grant, Public-Private
Partnerships for Affordable Housing, etc.
Liaison to Yuman Services Committee, Community Development
Block Grant Con ntittee, and Low/Moderate Income Housing
Task Force.
Budget reflects reimbursement of general fund expenditures on Community
Development projects such as supervision, accounting functions, building
inspections assistance, legal assistance. Reimbursements to the general fund are
based on actual hours as reported by various departments.
Travel expenses for the next three (3) fiscal years will be increased due to
the City's acceptance into 11UD,s Public-Private Partnerships for Affordable
Housing Program. Under the program HUD pays fees for training provided by
the National Development Council, travel expenses are paid by participating City.
If you have any questions or need further information regarding Community
Development operations and administration expenditures please contact me at
383-7236. Thank you.
Barbara Ross
'S
r
4
i
DRAFT
tj90 COMMUNT7y DEVELOPMEN'E CIET
ORGANIZATION: CD ADMINISTRATION $127,513
Personal services
8022 Office Clerical $ 17,158
8023 Technical/Paraprofessional $ 5,640
8024 Professional $ 66,106
8025 Management/Supervisor $ 31500
8026 Temporary/Seasonal $ 600
8041 Civilian Overtime $ 800
8051 Civilian Longevity $ 448
8061 FICA (Medicare) $ 11210
FICA (disability&rot) $ 5,168 JJ
8062 TMRS $ 4,693 + 11
i! 8064 Worker's Comp $ 475
8066 Health/Life Insurance $x.530
TOTAL $103,228
Supplies
8i01 Office $ 1,600
8102 Books and Magazines $ 300
8103 Small Toole & Instruments $ 300
8109 Postage $ 1,110
81 ib Film AL_... 10
TOTAL 3,310
,i
j
A
, [1
1
Administration Budget
Page 2
Maintenance
Building and Equipment $ 200
8301
Furniture and Fixtures $ 150
8340
Office Machines X1,200
8341 TOTAL $ 1,560
Services
$501 Telephone $ 11850
$ 3,476
8503 Travel Expenses
$ 2,000
8604 Advertising
8606 Dues and Publications $ 2,000
$ 1,400
8526 Electric Service
$ 300 E'
8627 Gas service
$ 6,0¢0
8518 Building Rent
8622 schools and Seminars
Sundry
8916 council and Board Expenses 400
Fixed Assets
Building and Equipment $ 500
9101
$ 500
9102 Furniture & Fixtures
9103 Office Machines I- 1 ?kQ
TOTAL $
~c ~
AG[~Ar ~
1D
WY of DENTON, TEXAS `MUNICIPAL BUILDJNO / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 /TELEPHONE (817) 566.8307 '
Office of the City Manager
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 15, 1991
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
RE: Appointment of Representative to the Upper Trinity
_'Regional Water District Board
At the last Council meeting, you approved a "Participating
Member" contract with the Upper Trinity Regional Water District
(UTRWD). This action authorizes Denton to have a member on the
Board of Directors of the UTRWD, A resolution appointing this
board member is on the Agenda for May 21st.
This board member should be someone who has extensive knowledge
of the water and wastewater issues in the Denton County and North
Texas area and how those issues relate to Denton, Therefore, I
would recommend that Bob Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities,
be appointed to this position. Bob presently serves on this
board as a result of the Council's appointment of Bob to the
Board of Directors of the "501" non-profit corporation that
Lewisville and Denton set up in 1988 to carry out the regional
water system goals identified by a regional county-wide steering
committee. The legislation creating the UTRWD two years ago,
identified the board of the "501" non-profit corporation as an
ii i
Bob's nterim board that would phase out on June 16, 1991; Thernfore,
S board appointment will provide responsibilities
coon that ntinuity on date n UTRWD
f Board.
E Respecully,
11oyo , Harroil, Cie Mana8 er
t
bddi rLW
.h
RESOLUTION NO,
A RESOLUTION APPOINTING A MEMBER TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT] AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE
WHEREAS, on May 7, 1991, the city council authorized the Mayor
to execute a participating member contract with the Upper Trinity
Regional Water District (the District)r and
WHEREAS, such participating membership entitles the City of
Denton to representation on the Board of Directors of the Di.stricti
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES:
,SECTION T, That is
appointed to serve on the Board of Directors of the District
beginning upon execution of the Regional Raw Water Supply Contract
between the District and the City of Denton, the City of Highland
Village, the City of Lewisville, and the Denton County Fresh Water
Supply District No. 1. The member shall serve a term of two years
or until his or her successor is appointed.
e
SECTION IIy That this resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1991.
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY.,
f
P eye`'
I~
postponecmr
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION POSTPONING THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 18,
3.991 TO JUNE 25, 19911 AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the regular council meeting of the City of Denton
scheduled for June 18, 1991 is hereby postponed to June 25, 1991;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES:
SECTION I. That the regular. Council meeting to be held on
June 18, 1991 be postponed until June 25, 1991.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1991,
r s,
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
r
ATTESTS
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BYS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
i
SYS
1
NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Member Government Designation of Voting Representative ,
As a member of the North Central Texas Council of Governments, the /
(Local Government) - hereby designates
Name: Tine:
Melling Address
Telephone
to serve as Its voting representative. to NCTCOG's General Assembly,
{
1
Signed:
Tine:
Date:
Under the Bylaws of the North Central Texas Council of Governments, each member government la Onbtbd to
I~ one voting representative on the General Assembly. The representsts,* most be an elected of 'al selected
from the governing body of the member government, The voting representative serves as liaison between
the local government and the Council of Governments; receives apeclel publioadons and announcemer>ta from
NCTCOG; and Is eligible to vote on proposed Bylaws amendments and for candidates to serve on 'fie
Executive Board. A city or county offlclal must be a designated voting representative in order to 1341 coneldered
for service on the Executive Board.
3 Since some voting representative may have retired from office - or some member
select a different representative from the one now serving governments may wish to
attempt to re.
certify voting representatives from member governments _ it has been NCThis has practice usually b been dent
Immediately following the munk;lpal elections (pending on an annual basis. (pending any necessary runoffs)}. , Therefore, we are requesting the `
r designakv of your official voting representative to NCTCOG for 1990.91. The optlon Is ovollable to fist your
existing representative - without formal rseppointment - unless he or she Is no longer bt office,
i
Please return form to: NCTCOG
P. 0: Drawer COG
Adington, TX 76006.6888
' CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
May 21, 1991
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Redistricting
RECOMMENDATIONi
Appoint a committee to work with staff to develop a
redistricting plan,
SUMMARY OF ISSUES:
(1) Splitting County Precincts:
At the direction of Council, staff has worked with a
council appointed committee to develop a proposal for splitting
county precincts into smaller blocks so as to provide greater
flexibility in drawing voting districts boundaries along precinct
lines. The population figures by race resulting in the proposed
splits are included in attachment #1. The attached map shows the
current voting district boundaries, current county precincts and
the proposed splits.
The county has indicated that splitting of county 4
precincts will result in higher costs to the county. It is usefu'
that the city's voting district boundaries be consistent with the
county precinct lines, The City Council in November 19820 adopted
a redistricting plan which splitted county precincts in five areas.
These splits were necessary in order to satisfy the `equality of
population range4 as required by Federal guidelines.
According to Planning staff in the City of Dallas their voting
districts has been splitting county precincts for the past 15
years, because it is more important to satisfy federal guidelines.
The issue as to how important and whose responsibility
it is to ensure that the city's voting district boundaries coincide
with county precinct lines has been fowarded to the Legal
Department and a response is pending. Our feeling at this time is
that it is paramount to draw city voting district lines to satisfy
the federal guidelines, in practice we have split county precinct
lines in the past and the City of Dallas has been doing it over the
past 15 years.
1
3
k
w
i
f
f,
~.I
Mayor and city council
May 21, 1991
Page 2
(2 ) ALTERNATIVEg_ TD FOUR SINGLE u~•,
cts wil .+BER DrS~TRIICTS_
election Any alternative to the current four
charter amendmentdistriwill single member
l require a city charter
more time for council require greater community amendment. and
redistricting plan has to bestaff to go through therticipa process. s, and
November 91 to be approved e for submitsaed to the just The
member district council seats y 9,, electionIce Department by
is in favor of an alternative sysld be on that ballotet' no single
amendment, we suggest that system which If council
election and that we a time will require a charter ~h ~ceed to redistrict be set for the
7.993
single member district for the edistrict using the current
election in 1992. four
RouNn
The current four single
charter in January member districts was institutod b
initially ado p 1980, The curr.,It votin by city
p in November, 1982 and amendedistrict
to take account of annexations i in 1985 plan was
appointed a committee rto the and 19l
redistricting plan which p work with e isy•taff Tn 1987 council e
population between votin provided for a to prepare a
was difficult g districts, better distribution
precincts. to redraw district line8hat committee found that it
agreed to Following the C without Splitting
put off ommittee's recommendations county
The 1990 redistricting anti) after the 1990 oensus.counoil
Census figures sho
'equality of popu ws
lation range' that districts 1 and district 4 is with in by 550, district 3 2 are over the
is under b
The st population distr3 - 87* of ibution b he 'ideal district p by
1479
and ionF, 90 The 29 attachment 2, by voting districts is given n'
In earl iven iri
Y April, city and count
advised to move forward with county precinct n met cit
21, the Council's committee delivered ftskct spl t and inq,e On A was
has not made a decision on count reCOmmendati, Aril
an adopted plan to y precinct s s• Council
any county official, plitting, n y delivered
I Staff has since March been advisin the County
committee's discussions.
g
Clerk of the council
rs
Mayor and City Council
May 21, 1991
Page 3
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
All residents of the city.
FISCAL MP CT:
Not applicable.
Re a fully su itted:
Lloyd v. Harrell
City Manager
Prepared by:
Harry N. Persaud, AICP
Senior Planner
{
i
Ap oved:
Frank H. Robbins, AICP
Executive Director
Planning and Development
i
i
I
i
- 1
i
' ATTACHMENT I
ReMo6l3 PROPOSED PRECINCT SPUT3 `
'PRECINCTS TOTAL WHITE BLACK HISPAN INDIAN ASIAN OTHER FOLLINO PLACE
1031 2528 2137 174 98 11 104 4 GUY LANEY
103.2 2836 2390 102 93 13 38 2 STATE SCHOOL
TOTAL 5164 4527 276 191 24 140 6
I032 1148 1463 184 71 15 17 0 FINE STATION f2
1051 1284 1138 18 92 3 1 0 DP.°.
TOTAL 3032 2603 232 163 16 IB 0
108.2 2188 2045 42 S4 _ t2 13 0 WiL00N
108.1 1316 1418 63 33 f 14 0 LUTHERAN CHURCH
TOTAL 3684 _ 3460 95 _ 87 _ ;3 29 0
f10.2 2083 2116 225 807 7 23 3 ROBERT LEE
110.1 2749 2000 288 461 9 14 0 SPECK EO, CENTER
TOTAL 5732 4115 493 1068 13 40 3
111.2 1177 822 07 223 4 32 0 CNIC CENTER
111.1 1227 588 413 165 3 57 3 TWU 4
TOTAL 2404 1388 510 410 4 89 3
Tie 1963 405 1121 414 7 4 9
4042 2333 2101 83 88 8 74 1 FOE STATION f6
404.1 1812 1366 40 62 7 7 0 CENTRALBAPTIWT CHURCH
TOTAL 4005 3657 103 148 15 81 1
405- 231 063 14 33 4 16 2
406.2 3115 2135 388 493 18 163 3 AtHLE71C9 CENTER
406.1 3296 2001 612 316 0 394 4 STATE HI GHWAY DEPT. A
TOTAL 6412 41% 878 749 25 557 7
4011 1412 1004 1e0 126 0 41 $ SIRICNUAIO
407.1 W3 702 56 43 12 7 3 TRINITY PREWERWN
TOTAL 2315 1866 216 169 12 48 4
405.2 1311 915 112 116 4 183 1 GRACE TEMPLE SAPTe9T
400.1 1473 1346 10 73 7 24 2 NEWTONRYZOR
TO'[AL 2784 2263 131 189 11 187 3
409 2285 1984 48 213 4 36 0
4102 0124 2368 225 367 9 126 0 OE WONSAPTOTTEMP LE
41011 2957 2190 233 910 23 184 2 UW
TOTAL 6081 4587 461 683 32 310 8
416 1384 11137 02 $19 2 34
4s8 1232 1175 5 46 2 3 1
4101 1703 1494 100 158 2 9 0 GINNNOS
419.1 1797 1430 146 114 to 20 1 CUMBERLAND PRE68YTERIAN
TOTAL 3500 2930 248 272 20 29 l
REMCn 13362 10809 1283 983 61 211 15
CITY TOTAL 66270 51968 6206 5937 265 1831 63
_A14
r.
' s
ATTACHMOT 2
CITY OF DENTON
TABLE 1: POFULATION DISTRIBUTION BY VOTING DISTRICT: 1980-1990
DISTRICTS 1980 % OF 1990 % OF POPULATION %CHANGE
POPULATION TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL CHANGE 1990
DISTRICT 1 11875 24,71 18046 27.23 6170 51.96
DISTRICT 2 12114 26,90 18040 27.22 6926 48.92
DISTRICT 3 12012 24,99 14260 21.52 2248 18.71
DISTRICT 4 12062 26,10 16926 24.03 3863 32.03
CITY TOTAL 48063 100.00 66270 100.00 18207 37.08
TABLE III:~ REDISTRICTING CRITERIA
Ideal District Population equafi total population divided by number of districts 16507
Absolute deviation should not exceed 5% of ideal district population 828
Equality of Population Range High 17396 --low 16739 ~
TABLE III:_ -ANALYSIS OF POPULATION BY VOTING DISTRICTS r
DISTRICTS POPULATION RANGE PLUS
HIOH LOW MINUS
DISTRICT 1 18045 17395 Over~b 650
DISTRICT 2 18040 17395 Over 645
DISTRICT 3 14260 15739 Under 1479
DISTRICT 4 15915 15739 3.87% OK
PLANNING AN I) DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT: 1990 CENSUS DATA
s~
Dnrr: May 1 , 1991
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Iv.-itt ~
TO: Mayor and Member,,; of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager
SUB.ILC'r: TELEVISING OF CI'1Y COIINCIL MIIhrINGS
PI UC NEN'DA'I'IOlt':
The Cable Advisory Board recomnends that tine City Council televise City Council
meetings in order to educate and infonn the citizenry in the most prudent and
economic manner, Given the potential of recurring operational and maintenance
culto associated with the televising of City Council meetings, staff recommends
this action be con,;dered in conjunction with the 1091-92 budgeting process,
i
SUMMARY :
For the last three months, the Cable Board along with staff has been studying
the feasibility of televising City Council meetings, Various cost estimates
have been presented and the Board strongly fecls that televising the meetings
can be clone in a cost effective manner, lurthernore, the Board believes that
televising meetings would hole disseminate information to the public, thus
resulting in a woll-infoniied citizenry and greater citizen participation.
In order to support such an operation, the City would have to purchase a good f
quality camera and a set of portable lights. Join Enlow, General Manager of c~
Sammons, has agreed to clear time on Channel 2S, the local information channel,
on `Tuesday nights, and has offered to place a video modulator at City Hall for
transmission and one at the Sammons Studio in order to receive the broadcast,
However, these modulators are a spare set for Sammons and Mr. Enlow cannot
guarantee that they are currently working. Under the Franchise, Sammons is
responsible for providing video modulators once the the City channel. is in
place; however, the channel space will not be ready for awhile and Mr. Hnlow
does not have the cost of new modulators in his current budget, If the
modulators are not in corking order, staff is confident that an arrangement
between the City and Sammons could be made whereby Sammons would reimburse the
City for the modulators once the City channel is ready.
the purchase of equipment is listed below and will range front $12,977 to
$16,977. I'he four thonsand dollar difference is contingent upon whether or not
Sammons' modulators are in working order. The monies to fund this purchase can
be spent from the $60,000 grant that was given to the City by Sammons for use
regarding the City channel as the equipment will be used once the channel is in
place,
1V1/050191068/l
i
{
4l
' I
YY,
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Nlay 3., .1991
Page 2. f
The actual camera operation for the broadcast could be conducted by University
of North Texas student:; wino would receive college credit from the University
and payment from the City for their t oi'k. Staff is currently working on the
possibility of an arrangement isri.th the University that would exclude, payment to
the interns. However, if such an arrangement cannot be made, student :intern
pay, ranges from $5.00 to $7,50 per hour. Dr. John Kidper, Chair of the Radio,
TV film Department, mr, and momber of the Cable Board, is quite confident that
there will be a talented pool u °*iulent, from which to recruit.
Staff is confident that the televising of the City Council meetings will not
cause any serious interruptions to Council meetings and that televising can
begin within a couple of months of a favorable decision by the City Council. i
BACKGROUND: 1
The issue of televising City Council meetings has been brought to the forefront
by n=crous Councils over tilt past It years; however, none of tite Councils have +
decided to televise the meetings. At the February 20, 199i, meeting, Jesus
Nava, Assistant to the City Manager, outlined research he conducted at the
request of the City Council concerning televising meetings, lie informed tine
Board that the Council had considered tine proposal a couple of months ago and
decided not to televise meetings.
The Board requested that staff determine tine equipment and lighting needs and t
prepare estimates. Staff worked with Walter Casey, consultant with Accent
Video in Dallas, and Satimions in order to deternino needs and cost estimates.
After much discussion and study, tine Board felt that by utilizing an excellent
duality crunera, one operator and a set of portable lights, televising Council
meetings could be done in a cost effective manner, Furthermore, the Board felt
strongly that 1.1.ve coverage of meetings would help disseminate iniforination to
the citizenry in an effective manner, resulting in a well-informed citizenry,
and ultimately rtllowi.ng for greater citizen participation,
PRWIri I5, DIII)MIMMI'S OR GROUPS APtl3CTBD;
City Council
Citizens of Denton
Cormmttnity Services Department
IVl/050191068/2
..r ....e~j.•._ _ t~ '1
r
'i
ti
Mayor and Member, of the City Council
May 1, .1991
Page 3
FISCAL IMPACT;
1, Camera and Accessories 3 chip JVC
ITF? Tripo(I :111(1 lloll},
3~~ 1,011(11 Light DP-3 Kit 1)197.00
4, Labor - One intern 1,420,00
5, Maintenance 900,00
6. Supplies 400,00
7. Miscellano0us 75.00
Subtotal 300.00
8. 2 Video Modulators (provi.clirlg1~;7id2 ~1(F
Sammons' are not in working order)
TOTAL 40000,00
Respectfully submitted,
ov
oy(T , acre.
City Manager 1
M Prepared by, '
v r Seiner
Administrative Assistant
COINmlillty Services
i
Approved by:
Director of Community Services
I
,
t
11(1/050191068/3
T T w
1i
!1
F.I
t
l I f [~l.~Fr~
USG
13X ERM' FitOld CA1i1,t9 ` ELIW'S1ON ADVISORY BOA d) HINU113S, MARCH 20, 1991:
1'1'11,1 1113: DISCUSSION OF COST ESTIMA'MS 1,,W M\111MITY INTf',RES'C IN
~,A1111~.Z~5"[' 4~711T~FI~~i ~['I'~~'OiJFTt.'3I~'T1f?E7`1T'G'~J
Staff presented cost estimates concerning televising City Council
meetings. Plur.e options Were presented to the Board by ~1r. Weiner. The
f first option wos utilizing stage of art equipment in order to obtain
excellent picture. quality. Mr. Weiner stated that this option was
recopvended by the equipment mid lighting consultant after he had ,
thoroughly studied the chtcract'eristics of the city Council. Chambers,
The only major disadvantage to tills package was the, fact that the number
of lights used would produce a tremendous amount of heat and result in a
very uncomfortable environment for both the Council members and citizens
presenting irtaterial at the Council meetings. 71ie cost of this package
was quoted at $73,021.00 for equipment and lights and an additional $600
per year for labor costs, totaling $7306Z1,00.
'ibe second option outlined by Mr. Weiner would result in a fairly good
picture quality and the. price quoted was $39,361.00 and an additional
$400 per year for labor costs, totaling $39,761.00,
R
Finally, the third option .300 per ),ca r at 1labor 276,.00 for totaling $19, equipment and
576.00.
lights and an additional p
The only problem with this option was that picture quality was poor.
Mr, Weiner pointed out that these quotes were estimates and that once
tills project was bid, the prices could possibly he lower, Staff con-
cluded its presentation and the discussion was opened to the Board, C.
C, Sexton stated that estimates seemed very high and that staff needed
to explore other options such as leasing of equipment. She also added
that she felt the televising of Council meetings could be donl with one
camera and a couple of portable lights, In fact, she I
at the Council meeting Samcons had been very successful in televising
short segments with a portable cauuera and lights,
I John Kuiper stated that the Board's approach concerning the Council
should be to push strongly for a plan of action for the city channel
which could be used to facilitate the televising of City Council meet-
ings, He felt that this might be a more prudent. approach with the City
Council. Joe Poar:ing asked C, C. Sexton to present the Cable Board's
view at the next City Council meeting. After some further discussion,
the Board decided to vote on the issue, C. C. Sexton motioned that the
Cable hoard recommend to the City Council that they pursue telecasting
City Council meetings in order to educate and inform the citizenry in
the most prudent and economic means possible, Susan blcGitire seconded
tice motion all ayes, no nays - the motion carried.,
1
lv1/050191067/3
a
j
aAx .
t,
S1
t
II
1
EI
I
t
i
fvatta{5~ V F 1 t a' ? . s 1 ~ f
m,.=;:,AUe~~, r«vrr,e, aY ~:rt .N.'S as ti° r : r'3,,?4Li s 3~K€• 9'lrci 'tft'` tA'~c? tt 1 4 h~~i1 Fx~ t ..r
sat it r~3'kC dY ~t{tai s X11
R
~t of
Denton
E Proposed
Precinct SpIl"ts
z,
AI
C~ Poring laces W Precinct Boundary
N District toundary - Precinct .
SpDat
T i
1 (a
i
419 DISTRICT 2
DISTRICT 3
104
tU.1
405
1
r
41, 40 S R1,
D
I
06
P ~
- _ i
ldr,
416 DISTRICT 1
I
fJ ~
DIST ICT «
, \
108
. M~
t
M
i
~ INX
}
5 W~
fob„ cam,
r
t
I
~a m v,
i
f'
t
I
i
E
i
C ity i
of Denton
x ~ e
Proposed Pre nct Spats
CJ Pollin laces ANY Precinct Boundary
p r;
r ~boundag w precinct Split
District y
N
r
DISTRICT 3 419 DISTRIC-1 2
- " 1 204 `
r
10..1
r
405
n.
415 40
,
416
- 1 j 105
I 416
DISTRICT 1
DIST PICT _
a
i
L'
E
WORD PROCESSING
SYSTEM
R.EPLACENIENT
1
MAY 13, 1991
CURRENT SYSTEM
w '
_ ~ is S: L r 1 of
CITY HALL LIBRARY
16 workstations 2 workstations
7 printers 1 printer
3
X"Tt
7 ° m, .
;
"
\F:CEtNTER
PERSONNEL 2 workstations 2 workstations
2 printers ,i printer
f
1
i
WORD PROCESSING SYSTEM
CURRENT VS PROPOSED
CURPENT PROPOSED
22 WORKSTATIONS 22 PCs
11 PRINTERS 10 LASER PRINTER
WANG WP WORDPERFECT
CHARTER GRAPHICS HARVARD GRAPHIC
LIST PROCESSING VENTURA
I
OFFICE SERVICES
LIST PROCESSING
CONNECTIVITY TO
IBM MAINFRAME
COMPARISON OF EQUIP ACQUISITION
SINCE 1984
1
USER ti
DEPTS J
WP
40,
NUMBER
OF UNITS
TOTAL COST $176,716
i
I
WPC LINES TYPE[
Thousands
3000
i
~--1 2600 - I
1 2000
1500 -
1000
600
0 - ~ -
86 87 88 89 90
FISCAL. YEAR
I~ LINES TYPED
fl
CITY OF DENTIN
WORD PROCESSING
GROWTH CURVE
1995 `
1990 w p
Li RECOMMENDED
SOLUTION
1978 TO BRIDGE
F -WORD PROCESSING NETWORK
COST COMPARISONS
Thousands
300 -
250.598
250
216.417
198.486 200- 175.765
I
I
160-
100-
60
0 .
WANG BTTECH IBM GTE
COSTS FOR w YEARS
FIARDWARE SOFTWARE
E-l MAINTENANCE ~ TRAINING
4
4 ' y
r 1
OFFICE SERVICES
1~9D1fi S1 F I CE k., -aEELCE i
ELECTRONIC MAIL ELECTRONIC MAIL
MAIL PACKAGES FILE MANAGER
FOLDERS MACRO EDITOR
DISTRIBUTION LIST SHELL MENU
MAIL CLASSIFICATION DOS FUNCTIONS
ELECTRONIC APPROVAL CALENDAR
TIME AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SET UP APPOINTMENTS
CALENDARS CHECK CALENDARS
CALENDAR 'SCHEDULING SECURITY
MEETING ROOM AND CALCULATOR J
EQUIPMENT SCHEDULING NOTEBOOK
INVITATIONS FLAT DATABASE
MULTI-LEVEL OFFICE SECURITY
BULLETIN BOARD
GATEWAYS - BETWEEN T LANSHANE
D
SYSTEMS
DIRECTORY SERVICES
MANAGEMENTNTOOLSSS AND
INFORMATION TRACKING -
FLAT DATABASE
COMPUTER BASE TRAINING
3645)
G*
Y
SYSTEM REPLACEMENT PROPOSALS
WAX, BTT Fem. H
NOVELL LAN NOV ii AN
0 WORD PERFECT 5,1 0 MENU SYSTEM
0 DOCUMENT MANAGER - PROFOUND 0 WORD PERFECT 5,1
0 HARVARD GRAPHICS 0 DOCUMENT MANAGER - REFERENCE
POINT
0 VENTURA DESKTOP PUBLISHING
0 HARVARD GRAPHICS
HOST GATEWAY 0 VENTURA DESKTOP PUBLISHING A
A
0 LAN OFFICE - E-MAIL -
CALENDARING
0 j270 IBM TERMINAL EMULATION
0 3270 IBM TERMINAL EMULATION
0 REVERSE LOGON FROM IBM TO
ACCESS E-MAIL - CALENDARING 0 DOCUMENT CONVERSION - PRIDE
0 WANG OFFICE - E-MAIL -
CALENDARING - SECURITY HOST GATEWAY
0 DOCUMENT CONVERSION
LIGHTSPEED
0 REVERSE LOGON FROM IBM TO
ACCESS E-MAIL - CALENDARING (?1
.OMM INI CATION NEEDS
0 ? LINES FROM CITY HAIL TO COMMUNICATION NFEDJ
INFORMATION SERVICES
0 2 LINES cROM CITY HALL TO
INFORMATION SERVICES
0 1 ADDITIONAL LOCAL CONTROLLER
2047E
r
, 49
WANG PROPOSAL
0 NOVELL NETWORK SOLUTION WITH BRIDGE TO MAINFRAME
0 HIGHEST RELATIONSHIP WITH NOVELL OF ANY RESELLER
0 CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN THE VS, THE LAN AND THE MAINFRAME TO
PROVIDE 3270 EMULATION AS WELL AS REVERSE LOGON FROM ALL
CONNECTED TERMINALS ON THE MAINFRAME
0 THE VS ELIMINATES THE NEED FOR MULTIPLE SERVERS ON A LAN AND
KEEPS THE NOVELL SERVER AND THE MAINFRAME FREE WHILE
PROVIDING OCFICE SERVICES TO ALL CONNECTED PCS AND TERMINALS
0 VS GIVES CAPABILITIES TO THE MAINFRAME THAT NOVELL-BASED
SERVERS WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO PROVIDE
r
{ 0 DOCUMENT CONVERSION
+f
0 LIST PROCESSING AVAILABLE
0 PROVEN PC EXPERIENCE
s
0 THE VS PROVIDES A TIGHTLY INTEGRATED SOLUTION ~ PROVIDING
THE PLATFORM FOR IMAGING
0 95% UPTIME GUARANTEE
0 30 QUALIFIED FIELD MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL IN THE METROPLEX
0 ISO ANALvSTS IN THE LAS COLINAS SUPPORT CENTER
0 TWO HOUR RESPONSE TIME
0 NATIONAL ESCALATION PROCEDURES
0 2+. MILLION PARTS INVENTORY IN THE DFW METROPLEX
0 MICROFICHE SERVICES WILL GIVE ALL OF THE CUSTOMER SERVICE
REPS ACCESS TO MICROFICHE FROM THEIR EXISTING TERMINALS
3366K
i
BTTECH PROPOSAL
0 NOVELL NETWORK SOLUTION WITH BRIDGE TO MAINFRAME FOR 3210
EMULATION
0 ONLY NOVELL GOLD AUTHORIZED RESELLER IN DENTON COUNTY
0 LOCAL VENDOR
0 WILL PROVIDE THREE (3) DAYS OF SERVICE TO CONVEk WANG
DOCUMENTS
0 WILL PROVIDE WANG TO NETWORK GATEWAY FOR UP TO ONE (1) YEAR
IF NECESSARY FOR CONVERSION
0 LIST PROCESSING CONVERSION
0 TWO (2) CERTIFIED NETWORK ENGINEERS
0 TWO (2) BUSINESS HOURS ON-SITE RESPONSE TIME
i
3366K
T_„ T
3
fi
}
t' e
Is
r(`
I
MONTHLY COST
AVERAGE DIFFERENTIAL
- 136
1600
979
1000
600 -
-50Q -410
-771
WANG 1 6TTECH 1 WANG 2 BTTECH 2
MONTHLY DIFFERENTIAL FOR 5 YEARS
M MONTHLY INCREASE M MONTHLY SAVINGS
ti
I
MICROFICHE REPLACEMENT
5 YR COST COMPARISON
i'HOUSANDS
12.658
14-
11.154
12
1
10
8-
6-
4-
2 _
WANG BTTECH
MICROFICHE COSTS
HARDWARE ®SOF"TWARE LJ MAINTENANCE
4
1
9
ADVANTAGES OF
WANG SOLUTION
• BETTER OFFICE SYSTEM
• EASIER DOCUMENT CONVER')ION
~
• DATA BASE REPLACEMENT
• FUTURE IMAGING CAPABILITIES
• REPLACE MICROFICHE SERVICE
FOR CUSTOMER SERVICE
• CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN USERS
ATTACHED TO EITHER SYSTEM
• STRONGER SUPPORT
• GUARANTEED UPTIME
• GUARANTEED 5YR MAINT COST:
1
i
{
ti
,
WANG IN THE NEWS
THE INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER FOR WANG COMPUTER USERS
MAY, 1991
"THERE ISN'T A LAN E--MAIL SYSTEM TODAY THAT CAN
TOUCH THE CAPABILITIES OF WANG OFFICE."
1
1
"WANG OFFICE IS THE ONE TOOL YOU NEED TO TIE YOUR
1
EXISTING EQUIPMENT - AND THE ENTIRE ORGANIZATION e
TOGETHER,"
(i
3366K
}
E
WHY NOW'91
• COST TO MOVE EXISTING EQUIPMENT
• UNACCEPTABLE QUALITY OF PRINT
• UNAVAILABILITY OF REPAIR PARTS
• USE EXISTING MAINTENANCE FUNDS TO '
IMPROVE EQUIPMENT/TECHNOLOGY
• STANDARDIZATION TO WORD PERFECT
0 HARVARD GRAPHICS
f:
DETAIL COST BREAKOUT
WANG BTTLC'i I1im GTE
IT':M DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE PRICE PRIDE PRICE
HARDWARZ
WORKSTATIONS 386 5 10,879 13,625 0 21,956
COLOR MONITORS 5 2,000 0 31391
NETWORK SERVER 1 18,833 22,857 0 24,964
LAN DISPLAY 1 152 0
TAPE DRIVE 1 21380 1,259 0 11159
GATEWAY STATION 1 29,746 17,720 0 4,625.
GATEWAY MONYTOR 1, 505 0
NON CENTER PRINTERS 7 71433 6,930 0 13,442
PRINTERS IN WPC 3 5,892 8,985 0 11.845
INSTALLATION COST 1 1,873 :,100 18,609 12:431
COMi`SLNICrITIONS EQUIP 2 5 , 744 9 , 000 0 2 , 0c 2
COLOR. PRINTER 1 650 1,986 0 2,209
FLA`i3ED SCANN FR 1 2,772 2,980 0 3,452
MONOC;IROME MONITORS 17 2 , 734 0 0 6 , 819 t
286 ^iirT.iTT0;1S 17 21 , 712 16, 269 134, 716 43,997
HARDWARE 'IGTAL 102,711. 153,97,] 15::,373 ~
HARDWARE DIFFERENCE 8,599 0 50,614 49,662
STWARE
D(nS 11CE:,SES 24 2,736 7,395 2,029
GATE*,AY LICENSES 1 171140 2,173 0 7,376
LAN SERVER SOFTWARE 1 0 51`150. 0 350
TAPE UTILITIES 1 0
j WORC?ERFECT 22 4,927 3,740 0 4,195
~
VENT*:RA DESK TOP 1 651 79:3 674
PUBL:SH DCCUNENT MNG 1 4,939 795
PU'BL:SHER PAINTBRUSH 1 189
HARV.1RD GR,'PHICS 4 1 , 396 1, 750 1 , 431
SCFTWARE TOTAL 31,789 13,397 71395 16,054
SOFTWARE DIFFERENCE 160392 0 (8,002) 657
MAINTENANCL
HARDWARE 1ST YEAR 23 41582 662 51376 13,735
HARDWARE NEXT 4 YRS 23 31,471 40,444 50,321 629161
SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 5 YRE 11,030 61000
MAINTENANCE TOTAL 47,082 47,107 55,697 75,896
MAINTENANCE DIFFERENCE (24) 0 81590 28,789
TRAINING
LAN :1ANAGEMEN'T 1 1,500 1,290 0 1,500
WORDPERFECT TRAINING 30 5,000 61760 0 4,500
LIST MANAGEMENT CONV 22 11805 2 500 300
TRAINING TOTAL 8,305 .00640 0 61-300
TRAINING DIFFERENCE (21235) 0 (10,540) (4'1240)
TOTALS
4 EQL1T?,SOFT,MAIN,TRNG 22 198,486 115,755 216,417 250,623
LESS TRADE IN 22 (40000) ('',800} 0
GRAND TOTAL 194,486 ,`1,955 216,417 250,623
TOTAL DIFFERENCE 22,532 0 44,462 78,668
R
G
E
I
MICROFICHE REPLACEMENT COSTS
J
WANG BTTECH
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE PRICE
EQUIPMENT NEEDED FOR MICROFICHE FOR CUST SERV
HARDWARE:
ADDITIONAL DISK 1 6,286 6,286
DISK CASE 1 450 450
386 WORKSTATION 1 2,246 21725
COLOR MONITOR 1 400
LESS TRADE IN 1 (800)
HARD14ARE TOTAL 1 8,582 9,461
SOFTWARE
DC-3 4.0 1 11-1 0
WORDPERFECT 1 185 170
SOFTWARE TOTAL 1 299 170
i
MAINTENANCE:
FIRS:' YEAR XAI;'T 1 360 0
NEXT 4 YEARS >IAINT 1 2,273 3,027
fAV;TENANCE TOTAL 1 2,633 30027
R
TOTAL FOR FICHE CAPABILITY 11,513 12,658
l
i
i
E
I
' ~ ._n try
fi
fl 1~
if
R
FUNDING CONPARISONS CURRENT VS PROPOSALS /
WANG LEASE PAYMENTS AND HARDWARE / SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE FOR NEXT 5 YEARS
NET14ORK REPLACEMENT ONLY
FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95
WANG NET14ORK 225,076 41,916 45,190 45,790 45,790 45,790
CURRENT MAINTENANCE 143,436 23,494 252844 282428 31,271 34,398
WANG DIFFERENCE 81,641 18,422 19,946 17,362 142519 11,392
MONTHLY INCREASE 1,361 1,535 1,662 1,447 1,210 949
WITH MICROFICHING CAPABILITICS FOR CUSTOMER SERVICE
WANG NETWORK 238,858 44,506 48,588 48,588 48,588 48,588
CURRENT MAINTENANCE 143,436 23,494 25,844 28,428 312271 34,398
MICROFICHE SERVICES 120,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000
AVAILABLE FUNDS 263,436 47,494 49,844 52,428 55,271 58,398
WANG DIFFERENCE (24,578) (2,988) (1,256) (3,840) (6,283) (9,810)
MONTHLY INCREASE; (410) (249) (105) (320) (55-1 (::18)
BTTECH LEASE PAY}fENTS 141TH HARDWARE /SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE FOR NEXT 5 YEARS
NETWORK REPLACEMENT ONLY
FY FY FY ~FY FY
TOTAL 90-•91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95
BTT3C11 ?fET1JORli 202,LG7 31,674 42,623 .12, 623 42,623 42,623 ` t
CURRENT MAINTENANCE 143t-136 23,494 251144 28,428 31,271 34,398
BTTT-CH DIFFERENCE 58,732 8,180 16,179 14,195 11,352 8,225
MONTHLY INCREASE 979 f.32 1 , 398 11183 946 685
WITH MICROFICHING CAPABILITIES FO:Z CUSTOMER SERVICE
I BTT.CH NETWORK 217,156 34,067 45,772 46,772 45,972 45,772
CURRENT MAINTENANCE 143,436 23,494 25,344 289428 31,271 34,398
MICROFICHE SERVICES 120,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000
AVAILABLE FUNDS 2631436 47,494 49,844 32,428 51j,271 58,398
BTTECH DIFFERENCE (46;280) (13,428) (4,072) (69656) (90499) (12,626)
MONTHLY INCREASE (771) (1,119) (339) (555) (792) (11052)