Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07-02-1991
9 ti y ~i R, AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL A July 2, 1991 i k session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, .•rr W Woorrk 2, 1991. at 5:15 p.m. In the Civil Defense Room of City jrjy Hall, 215 E. cKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: Note: Any item listed on the Agenda ofr the Work S s io the also lie considered as pa Agenda fo Regular Meeting. 5:15 p.m. 1. Executive session: A. Legal Matters Under sec. 2(e), Art. 6252.17 V.A.T.S. 1. Consider claim of Michael Wilson. 2. Consider action in Patel V, Ckty. B. Real Estate Under Sec, 2(f), Art, 6252-17 V.'.',.T.S. 7 C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), f Att 6252-17 V.A.T.S. Consider appointments to all City of Denton Boards, Commissions and Task Votces. 2. Discussion and consideration of Mayor Budget Issues r Report. 3. Presentation and discussion of the Capital Improvement Program. Tue Regular Meeting of the City o i Dent nC City Council xa of slay, July 2, 1991, at 7:00 p.m. Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the followiny items will be considered: f 7!00 p.m. i 1. Pledge of Allegiance i 2, Consent Agenda Each of these items is recommended baby the Staf staff approval thereof will be strictly on the recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the city Manager Staff reaommendationsplement each item in accordance, with I . a t City of Denton City Council Agenda July 2. 1991 Page 2 Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda item 3.A). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any it prior to approval of the ordinance. A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid #1256 Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer F 3. Ordinances A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purebase of materials, t equipment, supplies or services. (2.A.1. Bid #1256) B. Consider adoption of an ordinance prohibiting the parking of vehicles on both sides of West Oak Street, from Bonnie Brae street to Interstate Highway 35; providing a severability clause; and providing a penalty not to exceed two hundred i dollars. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends approval.) h C. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending the interim wastewater disposal contract between the City of Denton and the City of Argyle extending the contract term to January 1, 1992. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) f D. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute a contract with Carl G. Mycoff y and Associates for executive search consulting services for recruitment and placement of a Director of Electric Utilities. E. Consider adoption of an ordinance prohibiting parking in certain public cemeteries except for cemetery related purposes; and providing for a maximum penalty of $200 for violations thereof. 4. Resolutions A. Consider approval of a resolution approving the Capital Improvement Plan proposed by the Planning and Zoning Commission, (The Planning and Zoning Commission and the Public Utilities Board recommend approval.) t e. z City of Denton City Council Agenda July 2, 1991 Page 3 B. Consider approval of a resolution adopting a personnel policy relating to Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation. C. Consider approval of a resolution adopting an Investigation and Inspection Policy. D. Consider approval of a resolution adopting a personnel policy relating to a Drug and Alcohol Free Workplace E. Consider approval of A resolution authorizing Amendment No. 2 to the Airport Commercial Operator Lease Agreement between the City of Denton and Fox--51 Limited. (The Airport Advisory } Board recommends approval.) 5. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. 6. Official Action on Executiue Session Items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments i 7. New Business: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. t 8. Executive session; l A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 ( V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V,A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. NOTE: THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT IS LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE, C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1991 at o'clock CITY SECRETARY 3406C s' i 4 .5 CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNJCIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 78201 / TELEPHONE (817) 588.8307 OlNcs of fhs City Manaysr M E M O R A N D U M T0. Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jennifer Walters, City Secretary DATE: June 28, 1991 SUBJECT: Back-up for Agenda Item 02 and 113 - Work Session Back-up information for the above two items will be presented under separate cover in your agenda materials. j i ~7e r wa ra 2727C/2 I r . t V' j 2'651L-1/3689 NO, AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVEI SIDS ENTAN SUPPLIESN ORA SE~VICEST FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQU PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE. OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated s ip- competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, res ment, law supplies and City ordinances;n andcordance with the procedu of WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids areeRthe lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, suppli or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and for WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City udgot the rcha the appropriation of funds or servicesr athe and accepted materials, equipment, supplies herein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS, SECTION 3., That the numbered items or the following numbered r ma erials, equipment, supplies, bids To-r--ma- "Bid Proposals" on file in the Office of the City's"Purchasl.ug are Agent filed according to the bid number assigned heret ,bids hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible for such items: BID ITEM NUMBER NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 187,839.40 1256 J ALL PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION t r .1 the acceptance and approval of the above SECTION III That by is the offer numbered terns of the submitted bids, the City accepts in of the persons submitting the bids iorsuclieste or with the terms, sandervivi tees to materials, equipment, s,I p ~iantities purchase the specifications) standards q Bid accordance and for the specified documents, in the Bid Invitations, Propbeals, and related persons submitting SECTION III. That should the City and p sh to the octet approvall into n a accepted items and of the suabsmitted bids wish formal written agreement the City Manager the acceptance, approval, and awarding of tho bids, authorized to execute or his designated representative is hereby provided that the written contract which shall be attached hereto; p standards) quantities and specified sums contained specifications, specified sums she i tions, st is in ac in the Bid Prop cordance with 1ec Proposal and related bid documents accepted. roval of the above SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and a0 hereby 1 tems of the submitted bids the C ty Council written numbers authorizes the hex Cheitep~ `o,i funds thereiorine amount and in roved bids or pursuant to a accordance wit contract made pursuant thereto as authorized here become effective i SECTION V. That this ordinance shall n its passage and approval. imme~t~y upo , 1991. r day of PASSED AND APPROVED this BOB 5 EBER.RY r MAYOR I ATTEST: JE NI1!CR WAL 'IZS, CI~-SECRti'1' :Y APPROVED AS TO LEUAL FORM I DEBkiA ADAMI DRAYOVITCII, CITY AT'T'ORNEY BY: PAGE NO i i ? c i DATE; July 1991 QITY_CQUI~CIL_RE)?Q]j~ TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID 41256 - ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROPHOTOMETER DEUMMENDATIQN: We recommend this bid be awarded to Perkin-Elmer Corporation in the amount of $87,839.00 for the purchase of an Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS) and accessories. f MMARX : This bid is for the purchase of a Perkin-Elmer Model 5100 PC Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS). This unit is a laboratory instrumental analyzes for metal . pollutants in water, waste water and soil. Public Utility Board recommends approval. D$_CEPUMID: Memorandum prepared for Public Utility Board, Tabulation sheet. PI14gB$MD~_Di?$E33~18~~__Q8__4Q43ZPs AFFECTED: City of Denton Public Utilities, 1 j?ISC$i,_IMEAU : Funds for this purchase have been budgeted in the 1991 CIP projects, account numbers 624_082_RB90-Y101-9233 $66,oo0.o0 624-081-RB90-Y 101-9233 122.4.222A2 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS $680000.00 Respectfully submitted: L1oyd1V,~Harrsll City Manager proved: NametTom D. Shaw, C.P.M.wy- Title: Purchasing Agent J TS/,jh 167.DOC jI 1 ,y rvt k ,l 1 June 24, 1991 PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD AGENDA ITEM TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD FROM. R.E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities RE CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE PERKIN-ELMER PROPOSAL FOR THE PURCHASE OF A 5100 PC ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROPHOTOMETER, BID NO. 1256 RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends approval the bid proposal from Perkin-Elmer for the purchase of a 5100 PC Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS) at a cost of $87,839.00. BACKGROUND: The Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer. (AAS) is a laboratory instrument that analyzes for metal pollutants (chrome, copper, mercury, zinc, etc.) in water, wastewater and soil samples. This instrument atomizes metal compounds" by burning the sample and measuring the light produced by the element of interest. r The Municipal Laboratory Division purchased the existing Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS) in 1981 as part of the Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion. This equipment ! was purchased through the EPA Grant Program for pretreatment program activities. The EPA Grant Program paid for 75 % of k the initial purchase price of the existing AAS. The existing A:AS does not have the low level detection" capabilities required by state and federal environmental regulations governing water and wastewater pollutants. In addition, the existing system does not have the capabilities to analyze for arsenic or selenium at normal levels experienced in wastewater or water treatment, Additional disadvantages of this instrument includes extensive sample preparation and equipment set-up time. The existing AAS is a Perkin-Elmer instrument. This instrument has operated very well over the years with minimal down-time and maintenance expense. Routine maintenance of this equipment has been performed by staff and the equipment has not required expense maintenance contracts from Perkin-Elmer. When equipment maintenance was required, service from Perkin Elmer was timely. e? . The new instrument provides a number of features that will increase efficiency and ease of operation. These features include motorized lamp turrents; background correction and optical interface; automatic wavelength, slit and gas control selection; multi-element sequencing; computer interface with MS and PC DOS and several safety features including automatic flame ignition, automatic sequencing of gases when lighting or extinguishing a nitrous oxide-acetylene flame, burner head interlocks, flame sensing, pressure sensing, flow ratio sensing and a burner drain interlock, All these features are design to reduce the amount of time required for equipment setup and instrument operation complexity. SUMMARY. Perkin Elmer was the only bidder on this piece of equipment. The total bid for this equipment was $105,416.00. The existing AAS will be used as a trade-in and will reduce the total cost by $15,722.00 to $89,694.00. The staff recommends revising the quantities from two (2) to one (1) each on Item 8. Sample Tray "8" for the AS-90 and Item 15 THGA Tubes/Platforms. The resulting cost of the AAS and accessories is $87,839.00. PROGRAM/DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED3 i Citizens of Denton, City of Denton Public Utilities, Purchasing Department, City Council, Legal Department. 1 i I FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact on the Department with the proposed revisions is $87,839.00. The Capital Improvement Plan provided $88,000 of funding for this purchase. Prepared 7,,* Respect,fullbmi ed, HowarMaector .E. Nelsonxec. Director Environmeal Op rations Dept, of Utilities ApproyedJby` R.E. Nelson, E1 BID fl 1256 I i I 1 I I BID NAME AT014IC ASORPTION I PERKIN-ELMER HITACHI I SPECTROPHOTOMETER { CORP. I INST, ! I E i j OPEN DATE MAY 21, 1991 I I i I I I I I ACCOUNT # I I { --------I--------------- I--------.-------I - /f I QTY 1 IT- -EM- -DSC- - _E RIP-TION I VENDOR 1 VPNDOR I i i { I I 1 I I , I I I I I 1 I 1 I ATOMIC ASORPTION E $39,140.00 I 11 /B I I I SPECTP0PHOTOMETER I I 1 2 ! 1 ( FURNACE MODULE I $33,800.00 I NIB 3 I 1 I CONTROLLER ASSY. I $5,420.00 1 NIB 1 4 I 1 1 PLOW INJECTION SYSTEM I $11,900.00 I NIB I 5 I 1 I AUTOSAMPLER I $4,560.00 I N/B I 6 I 1! PRINIOR I $885.00 ! NIB I 7 I 1 1 CABLE I $31.00 I NIB 8 I 2 I SAMPLE TRAY I $1155.00 I NIB 9 I 5 I NON CODED LAMPS 1 $84.00 I 141B 101 1 1 EDL SYSTEM I $3>450.00 I NIB 1 11I 1 1 SYSTEM 2, AS I $375.00 1 NIB I J 121 1 1 SYSTEM 21 SE 1 $375.00 1 NIB I 13I 1 1 MERCURY DISCHARGE LAMP I $375.00 I NIB I' 141 1 I LEAD DISCHARGE LAMP I $375.00 I NIB I 15I 2 ! T11G TUBES/PLATFORMS I $1,400.00 I NIB 161 1 1 TRADE IN MODEL 4000 I $15,722.00 ! N/B 171 1 1 SHIPPING l $600.00 1 NIB ~ i I I ! I 1 I I I f , ! I I I I I ! I 1 E I I a { f E i I i EXCERPT PUBLIC UTI~TEIES,BOARD MIKES AS 1991 5. CONSIDER APPROVAL AL F THE TI ON SPECTROPHOTOMETER (AAS), BID PURCHASE OF A 5100 P 1256 AAS was that the existing art of , fff Martin reviewed the Municipal Laboratory Division in 1981 as part purchased by r;,r ansionj through an EPA Grant activities. The EPA Grant program Program the Wastewater Treatment Plant P rice of the existing AAS, for pretreatment program ro ram paid for 75% of the initial purchase p ations. This equipment is required to meet pp,gstMartin ad feed thatrthe ity was the disposition aosition of trade the in existivalueng for the existing one in the c city amount of $15:722. E i Acttoni City Council approval of E a Laney made a motion to recommend to the All ayes, no nays.,. this pu8afrom oPerkintElmer..bsSectiondon Spectrophotometer at cost by Frady. of $87,39 motion carriod. c)i i~ CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 1 ' Msyor and Members of the City Council TO: ' C,loyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: No parking on W. Oak Street SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION: Approval 5UMx: This ordinance will prohibit parking on both sides of w. Oak Street between Bonnie Brae and Interstate Highway 35. This will allow the street to function as a 4-lane divided roadway. OUND_ BACKGROUND: resiae~laesoarelane ; This section of W. oak Street Was recenjiy tly adjs. streetfputting the two outside f' divided. Cars parking on All these lanes out of intended use as travel lafte parking and their parking. residences have adequate support of no respective managers and owners are in PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED: ~ Engineering and Transportation Departments Denton Police E Department, and the motoring public. i FISCAL IMPACT. About $400.00 worth of signs 0773E e S" l3 ti CTSSC MEMO May 3, 1991 page 3 rl~E4t 1~5, NO PARKING" ON` WEST OAK STREET.f., The section of W, Oak Street between Bonnie Brae and Interstate Highway 35 has been rebuilt to 4-lane divided, it was envisioned that a good percentage of people coming to Denton from the north, especially Oak UNT-bound traffic, would revert to using the W. deal exit/corridor as their Inbound route, A expected to of that is happening now experience even more use as more people become aware of the improved route. People are now parking on the each sides dof thi irectlon trof to travel and endangering othec motorists. Majority of the residences in the area Are multi-family, mostly big apartment complexes. These apartments have adequate off-street parking and their managers are all in support of no parking on street. All the residences and businesses have been contacted by staff about the on-street parking condition and they seem to favor no parking. Staff parking ron W @Oak Street abetweenaBonn ei Brae and rl,H, I 35. ITEM 06 RkQUEST POR HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE ON WALNUT P The First State Bank on Walnut street,iunortheast handicapped parking space corner, at its intersection with Locust Street. The reason is to enable customers access to the bank for their handicapped A handicapped parking space at the proposed location would be deficient in both size and safety. First$ its width will be at least two feet narrower than standard, lest it encroaches deeper into westbound travel lane. Second, the driver's door (the handicapped driver) will open into vehicular traffic. Third, ther+: is a good chance of a roll ba9k of a wheelchair because of a not - very - gentle slope at that location. Austin Street is a safer it might require still aconsiderable walking even though k CTSb,; MINUTES May 13, 1991 page 6 Jameson said the dips are there. A prudent driver would not 91 airborne. from staff regarding the type of Chadwick asked for a clarification the atop ahead Iwuchukwu said it will be advance warning signs' out. The flags will be 'amoved signs with orange flags sticking after 4 to six weeks$ Iwuchukwu said a Smith asked about the warning signs for the dip. f signs wou~.d be very confusing in a res cluster o tr~he b bumps- this- like this. At 30 mphr You can drive this without feeling George Highfill came foe IEnd hat°ie whatf then citizens wants he There are 4 signs therdoesn't see the problem* we may n areas. Chadwick sething unanticipated that maythave~torbeifixed later. ,Coate som STAFF RECOMMENDEVI None sign to Avenue CONMISSIONERSi Smith made a motion totoerovera+athe at pap at Charlotte , Street and Avenue Hr aigns H, and to add advance warning signs for the eeaed with and dip. Kay seconded the mGue nis# anit Chadwick voting Kay, Amadorr galdwlnr Smith, in favor of the motion. Gore voted no. 0 PARKING ON WEST 0"' Iwuchukwu said staff has contacted all ark ng to The and big busine apartment in Support Of no s in he Ar to Navel adare equate onsito parking p All managers are in complex favor ` of the request. Iwuchukwu said no. Smith asked if a traffic count had besnudone' four lane division * The Clark said the traffic volumes are going p was built for capacity with 8' aaphelt. The street would have be is used for parking. Staff is if it were to be designed another waY hoping that this will be used as an access to downtown. Approval STAFF RECOMMENDED Gore commendation. , Chadwick, Amadorr Guess (OrjyISSIONBRS: Gorsaceptestaff re seconded made a the motion* motion to , Kay in favor Baldwin, and Guess voted Motion passed of the motion. Smith voted in oppo ITEM 6 RE VEST FOR HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE ON WALNUT STREEarking space on Iwuchukwu said the request was for a location n which has one these iot then chance Of rollback Ofoma walnut Street4 defiai+noies4 ivers wheelchair due to the Pr blame sand hrou9he traflitlnutfThesnetare main the door opening into t potential liability to the CitY. F~ g:wpdots\uaako ORDINANCE NO- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF VEHICLES ON BOTH SIDES OF WEST OAK STREET, FROM BONNIE BPAE STREET TO INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 357 PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE? PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS; AND DE- CLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. When signs are erected giving notice thereof, no person shall park a vehicle at anytime upon the following street or portion thereof, in the city of Denton, to-wit: Both sides of West Oak Street, from Bonnie Brae street to Interstate Highway 35. SECTION 11 That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sen- tence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the valid- ity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Coun- f the City n portions a despite any such invalidity. have en- acted S such ECTION III. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the require- meets thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00). Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is committed, . cube ,puand ni rid within the limits boveviolations such per-conviction of an such son shall SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective four- teen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official news- paper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. 1991. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVXTCHp CITY ATTORNEY { BY: !1 I Page 2 1 :z July 2, 1991 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROMI Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager RE: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE INTERIM WASTEWATER DISPOSAL CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE CITY OF ARGYLE, TEXAS, EXTENDING THE CONTRACT TERM TO JANUARY 11 1992. RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of June 24, 1991, recommended to the City Council approval of an ordinance to amend the interim Wastewater Disposal Contract extending the term of the contract to January 1, 1992. BACKGROUND: On December 5, 1989, Denton City Council approved an interim Wastewater Disposal Contract with the City of Argyle that provided wastewater treatment services for the Argyle Independent School district (AISD). While the Argyle i wastewater force main project was being constructed, the I{ wastewater generated by the AISD was to be transported by a waste hauler to the Denton plant for treatment and disposal. The City of Argyle was unable to complete the wastewater force main as originally scheduled because of project delays. The initial contract expired on September 30, 1990. On November 20, 1990, the Denton City Council approved a Second Interim Wastewater Disposal Contract between the City of Denton and The City of Argyle which extended the term of the agreement to June 30, 1991. SUMMARY: On June 6, 1991, Denton received a letter from the City of j Argyle requesting that the term of the referenced contract be extended to January 1, 1992, again because of project delays, The Argyle City Engineer estimates that the construction will take approximately three to four months and anticipates the force main project to be complete by early November, 1991. I a t t i i i i PROGRAM/DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Citizen of Denton, City of Denton Public Utilities, Legal Department, City of Argyle FISCAL IMPACT: The Interim Wastewater Disposal contract provides for the following fee schedules Monthly Facility Charge $ 50.00/1tl0O la Volume Charge $ gals Lab Analysis Fee $120.00 / month Surcharge $0.001386/mg/l of SOD $0.001715/mg/l of TSS Respect lly submitted, Ll d V. Harroll City Manager APP e dj ~X C .N Executive Director Department of Utilities EXHIBIT I Letter from Argyle Jur.e 6, 1991 II ordinance 90-187 III Third Interim Agreement (Draft) p IV Ordinance ; V Minutes PUB Meeting of 6%24/91 i FILEtC:\WP51\PUBAGEND\PUB691 FILE:AiPUB624.ARG $22 i Gary or 1~ 4 sYL E June 6, 1991 Howard Martin, Director Environmental Operations/Financial Administration City of Denton Municipal Building 215 East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Howard, Per our conversations of June 5 and June 6, 1991, 1 am enclosing a copy of the Second Interim Wastewater Disposal Contract between Denton and Argylle. Also, the following is a preliminary schedule for the progress of our force main project: 1. The bids for construction of the force main will be opened and awarded at the City Council meeting of June 25, 1991. 2. 1 estimate that construction will begin around July 15, 1991. 3, Don Rauschuber, our City Engineer, estimates that construction f will take approximately three to four months, which means that the force main will be completed sometime in October or early November, 1991, I would like to request that you begin preparing a Third interim l Wastewater Disposal Contract to expire January 11 1992. Thanks for all your help! Sin erne/l,~y,~Q Sarah E. Stone City Secretary i 1 l p'aa, [pi[F i `1sa .1 g:wpd0CS%1190030 i ORDINANCE N0. AN O AOFEARAPPROVING AN GYLE PRO IDING FORE INTERIM WASTEWATER DISPOSALNSERD THE CITY VICES AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I, That the Mayor is authorized to execute the third Interim Wastewater D theo aContract n of between t at Cit ed hDe ton and which is the city of Argyle, _PCT _0N ITj. That this ordinance shall become effective im- mediately upon its passage and approval. 1991. ' PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of i i ABCASTLEBERRY, MAY R ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, Cl,VY SECRETARY i BY : APPROV'tT OLEGAL FORM? DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCHt CITY ATTORNEY 1 By t j / ,:Lt~~.✓t-,j )tL't( ~;/'P1 t,~i7t:1 t.rrf.',.t.t: t ._!✓j, !LL-f I i• r ( 'Yrf J 1.?T. l,9 fO , ~ t~ r~ n ORIGINAL THIRD INTERIM WASTEWATER DISPOSAL CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DF,~I'ON AND THE CITY OF ARGYLE, TEXAS WHEREAS, the city of Denton ("Denton") and the city of Argyle ("Argyle") previously entered into an interim agreement to provide wastewater services for the Argyle Independent School District (AISD) until Argyle can arrange for permanent wastewater treatment services with the Upper Trinity '.egional Water District; and WHEREAS, the previous interim agreement has expired and Argyle hr.s requested that Denton continue to provide interim wastewater services until January 1, 1992; and WHEREAS, Denton and Argyle are authorized to make and enter into this Contract under Article 4413-(32c), V.A.T.C.S.; Now, Therefore, Denton and Argyle agree as follows: 1. Wastewater Services Provided by Denton A. Denton agrees to receive and treat at Dentonlz Pecan Creek Water Reclamation Plant located at 1100 Mayhill Road, Denton, Texas, the wastewater generated from AISD's educational facility located at 800 Eagle Drive, Argyle, Texas ("AISD Wastewater"). B. As between Denton and Argyle, Argyle shall be solely responsible for the transportation of AISD Wastewater to Denton's ` Pecan Creek Water Reclamation Plant. AISD Wastewater shall be delivered to a discharge point or points at Denton's Plant as specified by Denton at the time of delivery. Argyle shall cause i AISD Wastewater to be delivered to Denton during normal business hours (8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. Monday through Friday, excluding holidays). Any deliveries made outside of the times specified herein must be approved in advance by Denton. C. Argyle shall insure that AISD Wastewater shall be transported by a person or firm properly equipped and trained in wastewater transportation. Argyle shall insure that each time AISD Wastewater is loaded at the AISD facility for delivery to Denton, the delivery vehicle contains no other waste materials or liquids from any other source. AISD Wastewater shall be delivered directly to Denton's Reclamation Plant without receiving any wastewater or other waste materials or liquids from ariy other source. A "Liquid Waste Transportation Trip Ticket", attached hereto as Exhibit "A", shall be completed by AISD and the AISD Wastewater transporter at the time of loading and supplied to Denton with each delivery of delivery of AISD AISD Wastewater. Denton Wast water which itdetermines, in to receive disc etion, contains any hazardous metals or toxic substances, as defined by Denton's ordinances, as amended. f> . t IT. Billing ._and Payment for Services A. Denton shall bill Argyle each month and Argyle shall pay Denton within thirty (30) days after receipt of the bill for the wastewater treatment services provided herein the total sum of the following rates and charges: (1) A Facility Charge of $50.001 (2) A Wastewater Treatment Charge determined as follows: Ca acity of Vehicle x Number of Deliveries x $1.951 1000 (3) A Laboratory Analysis Charge of $120.001 (4) A Surcharge Treatment Fee of $0.000743 for each milligram per liter (mg/1) of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and $0.000751 for each milligram per liter (mg/1) of total suspended solids (TS) in excess of 250 milligrams per liter (mg11), as the terms "SOD" and "TS" are defined by Denton's ordinances, as amendedi and, (5) An overtime charge of $15.00 per delivery for any delivery of ATSD Wastewater outside normal business hours as provided in this Agreement, if any, B. The Wastewater Treatment Charge provided for above shall be based on the capacity of the transporting vehicle at the time of delivery and discharge, without regard to the actual amount of AISD Wastewater delivered or treated. TII. Term and Termination A. This Agreement shall terminate on January 1, 1992, B. In the event that Argyle fails to comply with any terms or condition pertaining to this Agreement, Denton shall give Argyle notice of said breach. Should Argyle fail to correct the breach within fifteen (15) days following receipt of said notice, then Denton shall have the right to terminate this Agreement before January 1, 1992, i i PAGE 2 1/ny{l' i s IV, No Re resentation of Continued service The intent of this Agreement is to provide ryfor 1inteTim wastewater treatment services for Argyle allow Argyle sufficient time to arrange for pm n en wastewater treatment services by contracting with the upper Water District. In turn, Denton will exercise due diligence es negotiating a contract for wholesale wastewater treatnand services with the Upper Trinity Regional Water District. Argyle ither agree that it is not the intention or hisntat Agreement Denton g party to the other that by the makin ceiv would provide to Argyle or that Argyle would ree from Denton beyond the t rm °f3e~and wastewater services in any manner Agreement. This contract iincluding Argyle benefit shall be considered Denton, and no other party, to have any present or future right or obligation under this Agreement. i V. Indemnification Argyle agrees to and shall inde,:inify and hold harmless Denton, its officers, agents, and employees, from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, causes of action, suits, and liability of r every kind, including all expenses of litigation, court cos s, fand or person, attorney's fees, for injury to or death of any damage to any property, arising out of or in connection with the performance of this contract regardless of whether such n injuries! death, or damages, are caused in whole or in part by the of Denton. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Denton and Argyle, acting under authority of their respective governing bodies have caused this Agreement to be duly executed in several counterparts, each of which constitute an original,.,- D day of , 1591. EXECUTED this CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS - ✓ BY., 606 CASTLEBERRY, MA R PAGE 3 I µ?w43 t }7y yy 7 4 3 i I I i i ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY JENNIFER WALTERS, APPROVED AS TO LEGALOTORNEY DEBRA DRAYOVITCH, CITY BY1 f CITY OF ARGYLE, TEXAS 4 BY S ~t NORM THOMAS, MAYOR ATTESTS CITY SECRETARY SARAH E STONE, BY: 119003k PAGE 4 i 1, - k';a s;ya EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES HOARD MINUTES JUNE 24, 1991 4. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE INTERIM WASTEWATER DISPOSAL CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE CITY OF ARGYLE, TEXAS, EXTENDING THE CONTRACT TERM TO JANUARY 1,1992: a Nelson introduced this item explaining that this contract was a result of a request from the City of Argyle to extend the existing Interim Wastewater Disposal Contract which provides wastewater treatment services for the Argyle Independent School District. The Argyle wastewater force main project has not yet been completed= however, completion is anticipated by November 1991. I Action: Frady made a motion to recommend to the City Council approval of subject contract. Second by Laney. All ayes, no nays, motion carried. II i i j x'. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITF..id MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL T0: FROM Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager DATE: July 2, 1991 SUBJECT: CONTRACT FOR EXECUTIVE SEARCH CONSULTING WIT" E MYCOFF AND ASSOCIATES , f , 1 RECOMMMATION Council It is the staff's recommendationthea Mayor to City a approve an ordinance author yCOff and Associaservicestes 1 contract with Carl G•. lities executive search all ExecutivenDirector tofgities. T in i his assist the City's Util filling the position of Directhe retirement of Ernie position is being vacated by Tullos after 20 years of distinguished service with the city. SUMMARY executive The recruitment and placement of this key position in our Utility organization will be a critical 1 decision and important to en5killshandaabilitiesuas with the technical knowledge, and man, This well as strong, effective leadership and management continue This skills is located and selected for this positio selection process will be pivotal range viability and define and plan for the long-range strategies of Our Electric utility in the Mr. se Mycoff has over 17 years experience selection and placement of Electric Utility executive He is well-respected positions on a national level. circles as and known throughout both public utility well as private utility organizations. Additiinnallhe Mr. Mycoff successfully assisted the city sucessfulrorecruit Manages selection of our current Electric It is the staff's recommendation to retain rnatlonal because of his expertise and understanding o o f electric utility operations, knowledge he Cityts tracklrecord utility operations, specifically, proven k-record ntial e City, and his ongoing knowlsk9llsfrelated to h with t s and n 0 also candidates with qualificati needs, Mr Mycoff als the CitY1s Electric Utility guarantees his selection and placement process for One year so that if the selected indi unacceptable, he will repeat the selection at no additional charge. Page 2 BACKGROUND The contract specifies and requires the following services of Mr. Mycoff: I Conduct a search to fill the position of Director of Electric Utilities. 2, Meet with management staff to develop a recruitment specification, job description, and needs and expectations of the City. 3, Conduct direct search and recruitment activities to identify potential candidates, g, screen potential candidates to determine appropriateness for the positions. 5, Present candidates to beninterviewed hbyuCity imanagement. Prepare an appropriate interview guide for evaluatin ly a in the measuring decision e making candidate psirly and bjective PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED Mr. Mycoff will work directly with the Executive Director of Utilities, Bob Nelson, and the Director of the Personnel/Employee Relations, Tom Klink, selected recruitment and selection process, candidate for the position will interact and have leaership involvement with all key management ~ positions in the CitYr have eep day-to-day operations and employees of the entire Electric Utility Department and prepare and present staff recommendation to the Public Utility Board and City Council on management and budgetary requirements for the Electric Utility Department. FISCAL IMPACT The cost see formed. ice is specifically tied to each lwievelll performed. of services es be based on 25% of the annual starting salary but will ~ not exceed $22,000. Respectfully submitted: i Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager `+q r , r cpgp@I~j i .v Barra I 1 i I - Page 3 - t r Preparorl by Thomas W. Kl nk, Director of Personnel Approved: i obert E. Nelson Executive Director Department of Utilities + , I 1 s j I 1 s i i i 1 ;I 4 i E As\CC7.2 { j j. 1 eowpdocs%mycofi,o j ORDINANCE NO. TO EXECUTE AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND MYCOFFYAND ASSOCIATES INC. RELATINGETO THE CITY OF D NTON j EMPLOYMENT SEARCH SERVICES; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE: AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: and execute ~j SECTIOhi That the Mayor is o£ horized to Mycof.f and attached agreement between the City of search services for the Associates, Inc. relating to employm position of Director of Electric Utilities. Council hereby authorizes the gECTION II- That the City expenditure of funds as set forth in the agreement. 1 cxcTrON I?I:• That this ordinance shall become effective n its passage and approval. immediately upo 1991. of 1 PASSED AND APPROVED this the day W BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR i i ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY i BY,. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY I BYs i 6 E 4? 4 (1 i, EE55 ppgg N S ~~TT '7 vY6+; r MV?t ~8i1 19 FROM OISGL?Ot51lSIJbUSCJ7J' 10 u'n'26,91 17:41 No,002 P,02 ' etunycaffk ACRZEMENT BETWEEN THS CITY OF DENTON AND MYCOr? AND AS80CT.ATZS The City of Denton (the City), a municipal corporation located in Denton County, Texas, and Carl A. Mycoff, d/b/a Mycoff and Associates (the Consultant), a sole proprietorship operating in Conifer, Colorado, agree as follows: 1. services to be parforbed by consultant, The City retains the Consultant to conduct a search to fill the position of Director of Electric Utilities for the City by providing the following services: A, The Consultant shall meet with the management staff of the City's Electric Utility Department to review and discuss the job specifications and job description and i utilize recruitment documents approved by the City to recruit qualified candidates. E, The Consultant shall conduct direct recruiting efforts to identity candidates, including direct contact with poten- tial candidates known by the Cityo municipal sources in a position to refer appropriate candidates; and govern- mental association and management profossipnals through astabllohed networks and recruiting sources, placing special emphasis on recruiting qualified minority and female candidates. C. After appropriate candidates have been identified, the Consultant will perform an in-depth telephone interview with each candidate. The Consultant will screen the candidates to determine their appropriateness for the position and their degxoa of interest in employment with the City. Names and background information regarding approximately eight to ten candidates will be submitted. The city staff will review this documentation to decide on the candidates the Consultant will interview, The city staff will review the "field" interview report to select the candidates for personal interviews in Denton, Texas. if requested by the City, the consultant will prepare an interview guide based on the job specifica- tions for use in the final interview proceas. D. The final selection of the candidate for the position will be the responsibility of the City. The Consultant will be available to sit ih as obso ver during final interviews, it none of the candidates are acoaptable, the consultant will repeat the starch process until aoneptable candidates are located. The Consultant will maintain class contact with the candidates and be pre- t TO 18175668533 P.82 4t~y 08128 FROM ONE5i0P8USINE55CTR 1 I l I, pared to assist the City in salary negotiations if requeated~ erso S. If the cr re igns within oneayear y of $ acterminated cepting the posi- Clause tion, teen, Consultant will conduct a elati d expp ses allow dfu der related tee, other this Agraemsnt~ directly tly xr. gobudula of services. The Consultant chaff commonae its services within sinfacexecution of this cordance wi h the following ached le: perform the services or actions A, Maetingtshallobe rovi6V the aomplvtod owithinrone tion and specifications month after execution of this Agreement. the and of the Do second afrota thedo be ate of the meetings with the city second month staff to review the job deaorigtian and specifications, I C. candidate presentations and field interviews by the from Consultant of the otings with ntheeCity staff toys view the date tna job aescription and spa0ifi.cationo. aotivitX th weekly oral Q, The Consultannt ill provide progress reports 1. The final candidates for the position shall beidentiow t lied and presented by the Consultant to the. City within 94 days from compl.stion of the initial jab spacifica- tions outlined in II.A, above. III. 09aponsati,ou to be laid Consultants City agrees to pay the consultant an follows: A. Twenty five peroant (254) of the annual starting salary of the individual employed, up to a maximum payment of for in ollowul for areero nt. Thed feer is all payable as f for in this Ag $1,000 upon execution of this Agreewienti $5,000 after the vomplotion of the services d"oribed in paragraph 11, Ar l3,oOo after the oorapletion of the services described in paragraph IX, Bt i 1 j PAGE 2 I K} Y! r {ri O i,27NiI9Pd 8,21 FROM Q[IF`STOPBU53N.`551,Rv TO 1,$.~7 Jfi.6 5,33 41. i $3,000 after the completion of the services described in paragraph II, C; and The remainder within fifteen (16) days after the selected Director of Electric Utility commences employ- ment. 5, The City will pay the Consultant, up to the maxin= compensation of $22,000 as provided above, expenses for the followings 1, Travel expanses to Denton to most with the City { staff to review the job specifications and descrip- tions. 2, Travel expenses for additional trips to Denton to discuss candidates and to attend interviews as requested by the SxecUtive Director of Utilities or j his designee. s. Travel field expenses interviews to visit candidates selecte by the City for 1 Travel expenses shall mean expenses of transportation, including airfare, taxi fares, recital vehicles, parking, and related transportation costs; hotel charges; meals; gratuitiest long distance telephone charges; and related travel expanses directly incurred in the performance of this Contract, Expenses incurred by the Consultant pay- able uftder this Agreement shall be submitted to the City in the form and manner specified by the City. iV, TA al status of Candidate, city shall verify the employ» stmt eligibility of the candidate referred by the Consultant and hired by the city and provide the Consultant with a photocopy of the 11stionpastrequiredfbyathen Irrigrform ReformaandycontroltActoof 1986. V. supervision and Control by Citiy► The Consultant is an independent contractor and shall not be deemed to be or considered an employee of the City for the purposes of income tax, withhold- inq, social security taxes, vacation or sick leave benefits, work- er's compenxation, or any other City employee benefit. The Conoul- tant shall control all ways and means incident to the proper per- formance and completion of this Agreement, V1, indemoifiaation, The Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability of i a<»y kind whatsoever, by reason of injury to property or third per- sons to that extent directly and proximately caused by the error, PAGE 3 .tile .fA§iriA4(L ` H i 66 33 Pgy 4~:+:a.^M 06(~7i~99,1~~,Q21 FROM q1LE`(QPBU5'MSWRVv TO .~u}i S{VeS71 If 4J INU.VVL r. U) omission or negligent cot of the Consultant, its officers, agents, employees, and invitees in the performance of this Agreement, and the Consultant will, at its cost and expense, defend and proteat the City against any and all such claims and demands. Vila Tara. This Agreement shall begin on the data executed by both parties and and when the all services have been performed and i all oonditions of this Agreement have bean satisfied. ; I Vilto Caaoellatiort. The City may cancel this Agreement at any time by giving fourteen (14) days prior written notice. Iii a can- didate evaluated by Consultant is hired after cancellation, the full fee vhall be paid by city to Consultant ' L"XLCUTED th,s the day of 1991. 1 BOB CASTLEBERRY, KAPOK I p ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTZROt CITY SECRETARY Sys - APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCN, CITY ATTORNEY I BY: MYCOFP D ASS I S / BY: A. NYCOF ATTEST: SECRETARY - - l PACK 4 p i. i t { i ; IPAL BUII.D)NG / DEN TON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817 666 566*8309 83ry Office of the Glty fv1UNlC TE cIrr'ofoEnrTOa, XAS M E M O R A N D U M TO City manager Lloyd V. Harrell. ' Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manage= FROM. DATE June 28. 1991 l BUSJECT: parking in Oakwood Cemetery 1 I, we look at monitoring Member Chew requested that been experiencing Council Oakwood Cemetery. We have during athletic Or parking is eo le parking in the cemetery there is no problems with r elated activities. CurrentlY. This ordinance other park this kind of parking• rules ordinance prohibiting to enforce No parking ice D kill allow theot er thane cemetery related activities. I for everything I would be happy If you or the council have ourroonvenienceons, to try and answer them at Y Rick 5vehla snags= Deputy City M R9obw 5396M i i 1 j i i r y;vpdocs\69f13o ORDINANCE NO. - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROHIBITING PARKING IN CERTAIN PUBLIC CEMETERIES EXCEPT FOR CEMETERY RELATED PURPOSES; THE FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOFI PROVIDING FOR MAXIMUM DATE- AND PROVIDING FOR AN COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTIQN I. That Article III of Chapter 25 of the Code of ordinances is amended by adding a new section 25-173 to read as follows: Sao. 25-173. Parking. ' No person shall park any motor vehicle in Oakwood or I.O.O.F Cemeteries except for he purpose repairing attending a funeral, visiting cemetery a gravesite, or maintaining or SECTION II. That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $200.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective four- teen (14) days from the date of its passage, of anthis d the o dinance re abe is hereby directed to cause the caption published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official news- paper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the k date of its passage. E i - , PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1991, i I BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY By t - - APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: 9;wpd0cs\clpr ` RESOLUTION N0. CTIVE PITAL ON; AND PROVI IMPROVEMENT DING FORR A14 SEFDFEBY THE RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CSSI A r PLANNING AND ZONING COMrSI DATE. and zoning of June, 1991 the planning WHEREAS, on the 12th day t, ,l to be constructed the Commission recommended fiveCyearperiodi and during the forthcoming 91 the Publ WHEREAS, ic Utilities on the 29th day of May, 19 ital improvements to be constructed during Board recommended five year period; and the forthcoming of the recommenda- WHEREAS, the City Manager furnished a0f°July, 1991; and tions to the City council on the 2nd day Hance with WHEREAS, all of t5eGtionB10.03(a)(6)r o hen City charter; and the requirements council swishes to formally adopt the recom- WHEREAS, the City NOW, THEREFORE,: mendations of the Board and DENT N HEREBY RESOLVES: THE COUNCIL Of THE CITY Of ves the attach the forth- That the Council appro ing !I 0 osed to be constructed dur capital improvements prop coming five, year period. CT 0 I. That this resolution shall became effective im- S-te Y -j" passage and approval. mediately upon its pa , 1891. day of PASSED AND APPROVED this the BOP. CA5TLEBERRY, MAYOR y ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY JENNIFER WALTERSr BY: APPROVED A. DRAYOVITCHI CITY ATT1')RNEY BY' w , s. DATE: 07/02/91 C'I~Y COUNC~I REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor aund Members r° the City Coancll FROM; Lloyd V. llarrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Approve a Resolution on Anti-Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation Policy (108,12) RRA?MNt_P.NDAT_M UN It is the staft's recommendation that the City Council approve a resolttion authorizing the City Manager to implement a personnel policy on Anti-Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation (108,12). This policy w111 implement a drug screening program for applicants for positions at the City and for employees when reasonable suspicion of drug or alcohol use is confirmed £i I~MMAItY The City of Denton recognizes that the use of drugs and alcohol in our society is a significant problem. It also recognizes that in some cases, this problem affects some employees' ability to deliver quality services to the citizens of Denton. This policy, along with the current Drug Free Workpl.aca; policy (108.11) would prohibit drug and alcohol use in the organization and ensure an adequate mechanism for managera and supervisors to exclude from employment those who demonstrate drug use or alcohol nbuse. Through these policies, necessary procedures would also be provided for managers and supervisors to determine drug and alcohol use on the Job through reasonable suspicior. and provide for testing employees. The opportunity to provide employees assistance for rehabilitative efforts in appropriate situations through the Employee Assistance Program (EAP) is further included. ~lAc~a ottN~. As tine, population grows, so does the use and abuse of drugs and alcohol.. This in turn Impacts cost of services to the citizens and loss of employee productivity. It is important that we demonstrate to the community a positive, prudent and responsible posture and ensure the organization is fret: of drug and alcohol use in the work environment, At the same time, we must; onsilre responsible and fair practices in dealing with suspected usc• in the worx environment, The proposed Anti-Substaa.;e Abuse and Rehabilitation policy and the proposed revisions to the Drug Free Workplace policy provide the tools by which to accomplish this goal. We recognize that abuse is a disease and have taken reasonable actions through the Employee Assistance Progrnm (EAP) to assist, employees who admit to and take responsibillty for correcting the problem. however, the HAP program does not relieve the employee from aetioEts which would be grounds for appropriate disciplinary action. t I; July 2, 1991 City Manager Report - Anti-Suilstauce Abuse acid Rehabilitation Policy Page 2 The Anti-Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation Policy prohibits employees from manufacturing, using, possessing, selling, distributing, consuming or tl'anepOrtlll$ any controlled substance or alcoholic beverages while on City property when conducting City business, or when performing job duties or responsibilities. Prescription and over-the-counter medications are also prohibited if prop,-,-v procedures are not followed, r, This policy directs that testing for drugs and/or alcohol be performed under the following conditions: 1. Current. employees in which reasonable suspicion exists that an individual is performing job duties or representing the City under the influence of drugs or alcohol 2. Current employees who are promoted into a safety sensitive position within the City of Denton. 3, All applicants who are offered a position with the City of Denton as a condition of employment. Research has been done to ensure that, the City of. Denton testing procedures are in compliance with the mandatory guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs through the National Institute of Drugs and Alcohol Abuse (NiDA). As defined by the "Federal Register", the initial test (or j screening teat) is an immunossay screen and should be conducted to eliminate "negative" urine specimens from further consideration. The most commonly used immunossay screen is the Enzyme immunonsay (EMIT). A confirmation test or second analytical procedure would be conducted to identify the presence of a specific drug or metabolite which is independent of the initial test and which uees a different technique and chemical principal from that of the Initial test: In order to ensure reliability and accuracy. At, this time[ gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) is the only authorized confirmation method for cocaine, marijuana, opiates, amphetamines and phencyclidine. The following substances will be tested in all final applicants (new hires and promotions to safety sensitive positions) upon offer of employment and/or if reasonable suspicion exists in current employees, o Marijuana Metabolite o Cocaine Metabolite n Opiates o Phencyclidine (PCP) o Amphetamines o Barbiturates o Benzodiar,epines o Methadone o Methaqualone o Propoxyphene ( vii li rin;vzr•r~ Ji July 2, 1991 City Council Report - Anti-Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation Policy Page 3 Alcohol use gill be tested through a blood sample for current employees in ,4hich reasonAle suspicion exists. An employee m,ay request to give a second blood or urine sample under the same conditions as set forth by the policy. All costs for a second collection and second analysis will be paid by the employee. In the review by the City Council on June 26, 1991, the administrative staff M indicated that all final candidates who are offered a promotional position at the City would be required to pass a drug test, It has been the administrative staff's recommendation that all gobs in the City are considered safety sensitive positions, This position is taken because of the potential for any employee performing a job and impaired because of being under, the influence of drugs or alcohol could potentially cause harm to themselves, another employee, a citizen, or damage the public's property or equipment. The legal position is that safety sensitive positions are only those that require the employee to operate equipment, vehicles, etc. as a part of their jobs, Thus, minor revisions to the policy have been made to t` provide for drug screening/testing of: i. All final applicants (non-employees) for positions prior to appointment, 2. Final candidates (employees) for promotion into safety sensitive 1 positions (as has been advised by the Legal Department) prior to appointment, and 3. Employees when reasonable suspicion is confirmed, PIR MW., DEPA.RMAT$ D3 QRAS F EC Di This policy covers all employees, regular full-time, regular part-time, temporary, and seasonal, Civil Service employees are governed by the will be general Civil Service special orders (Chapter included provisions in o the State the3Police andthisFpolicy Departments, , rY„ l Y l l i Council Report - Anti-Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation Policy July 2, 1991 i City r i page 4 ! F ~MP_PC7: approximately 260 drug LSOAL polScy anticipating app nting this the year at a cost of $36,00 per test is estimated at $81760, 1 The cost for impleme screens during These amounts will be paid from current budgeted funds. L,,spactfully submitted: Lio 4dV. Harroll City Manager Prepared by 1 1 J4 Thomas W. Klinck Di .°r °f Perscnnel rect Approve : t Executive Director Betty Mc aa1 Servtces and Economic Development for Muni i cmrpti0.prn G/26/91 rev: 6/2a/9i t4 e,Npdoteldru0.r t RESOLUTION NO- RSONNEL RELATING A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A AND pROVIDINGIAN EF ECT VE TDATE SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND REHABIL WHEREAS, the Director of the Personnel/Employe Relations Department for the City of Denton has presented a proposed regarding certain employee rules and regulations for the Council's consideration; and WHEREAS, according to ACRE, a non-profit membership organiza- tion that works to prevent drug abuse through public education, alcohol and drug abuse accounts for $110 billion in lost produc- tivity annually; absenteeism related to substance abuse costs about $1 billion andt one druininouthe r mplt yeearf0and 40 year olds reports using thou- WHEREAS, over the past two years, the City has spent many and employee time to sands of dollars and devoted thousands of hours dealing with substance abuse of its employBes drug and alcohol abuse within the City presents a f WHEREAS, threat to the safety of the public, causes accidents, decreases productivity and increases medical expenditures; and WHEREAS, the city Council desires to adopt this policy to com- bat these problems; NOW, THEREFORE, I THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: StgM ON Y. That the following policy, attached hereto and made the City a part hereof, is hereby adopted as an official policy of of Denton, Texas: Anti-Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation (Reference No. 108.12) aFCTION Ii. That the foregoing policy is attached hereto and made a part hereof and shall be filed in the official records of ' the City of Denton with the City secretary. axcm ON IIj. That. if any section, subsection, poligyapor sentence, clause, phrase or pword erson iortcircumstanceois held invalid application thereof any p urisdiction, such holding shall not by any court of competent j ortions of this resolution, the the City y CounciloofttheCityof remaining portions Texas hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any invalidity. 7 ~1RC11i. s j ~ i i SECTI~~1• That this Resolution and the Policy shall become effective on the 15th day of July, 1991. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1991. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: i APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: it DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY i BYi t i PAGE 2 l CITY OF DENTON AADE OF 12 POLICTIADIC NISTRATIVI P1003DIURIlADMINI&TRATIVI DIRIOTIVA REFERENCE NUM8ERr SECTIONr PERSONNEL/EMPLOYEE RELATIONP 109.12 - EFFECTIVE DATE. SUBJECT 07/15/91 STANDARDS OF CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES REPLACES TITLE ANTI-SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND REHABILITATION i POLICY STATEMENT: The City of. Denton recognizes that employee sub;stance abuse can have a serious adverse impact on its Image as a major employer in Denton, its ability to deliver quality services to its citizens, and the general health, welfare, and safety of its employees and the public. The pervasive presence of substance abuse in our society and the adverse effect on employee health, safety and productivity in the work place requires the establishment of an Anti-substance Abuse and Rehabilitation Program. The City, in considering its daily operations of providing quality services to its citizenes recognizes its responsibility to implement appropriate measures necessary to the safe, efficient, and effective use of its resources--people, facilities, equipment, and finances. The City's responsibility requires the public trust and demands comprehensive safety measures for the protection of the well-being of our employees and the citizens we serve. It is the policy of the City that employees are prohibited from manufacturing, using, possessing, selling, distributing, consuming or transporting any controlled substances as defined by the Federal Controlled Substances Act or the Texas Controlled Substances Act, or any alcoholic beverages or intoxicating substances on city property at any time when conducting city business or performing their job duties and responsibilities. i An employee is prohibited from performing his or her job duties while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or if performance is impaired, while under 1 the influence of lawfully prescribed or over-the-counter substances. An employee shall not have a detectable level of dangerous drugs, controlled substances in his or her urine or blood stream except pursuant to a valid personal prescription. An employee shall not use or possess alcohol outside of work hours on City property where prohibited by state or local law. The employee shall not use alcohol or drugs while wearing a City of Denton uniform, irrespective of whether the employee is on duty. It is the policy of the City to give the same consideration to applicants or employees with chemical misuse patterns or dependencies as it does to applicants or other employees having physical, medical or mental problems which could preclude them from performing their job duties and responsibilities in a safe, efficient, effective and productive manner. Revised 06/27/91 3176a t ff•$'zs~-Sti7 . 01" } l Page_ 2 of 12 POLICY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (Continued) (REFERENCE TITLE: ANTI-SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND REHABILITATION INUMBERt 108.12 - _I There is no intent to intrude upon the private lives of employees or applicants. However, the City is concerned with those job-related situations where the use of illegal or illegally obtained drugs or the abuse of alcohol interferes with the health and safety of employees and the public, affects the employee's work performance during work hours, adversely affects the job performance of other employees, or is considered serious enough to be detrimental to the City's conduct of business. In the case of employees who demonstrate chemical misuse patterns or dependencies, it is the policy of the City to assist in rehabilitation efforts through the city's Employee Assistance Program in an effort to return the employee to a productive role In the organization. However, such assistance shall not excuse the employee from appropriate disciplinary action for violation of the City's or a department's policies, procedures, rules, or regulations, including termination of employment. It is the policy of the City to deny employment to applicants who are identified through drug testing and who demonstrate patterns of chemical abuse or dependency. r This policy applies to all employees, regular full timer regular part-time, temporary and seasonal. Civil Service employees are subject to the applicable provisions of Chapter 143, Rules of the City of Denton Fite Fighters and Police Officers Civil Service Commission, and the general and specific orders of the Police and Fire Departments, which may include the provisions of this policy. I, ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES A. Prohibited Items. The manufacture, use, possession, sale, distribution, consumption or transportation of any of the following substances while on City property, conducting city business, or performing job duties and responsibilities by employees or others is prohibited: 1. Illegal drugs, controlled substances, marijuana, mood or mind altering substances, simulated controlled substances, designer and synthetic drugs, and inhalants producing mood or mind altering vapors. 2. Alcoholic beverages or other intoxicating substances) provided that an employee may possess, consume or transport alcoholic beverages while off duty unless local or state law otherwise prohibits the possession or consumption of alcoholic beverages. 3, Drug paraphernalia and literature supportive oft instructive of, or advocating illegal drug or substance use. Revised 06/27/91 3176a Page 3 of 12 POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (Continued) IREPERENCE TITLE: ANTI-SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND REHABILITATION (NUMBER: 106.12 B. Prescriptions and Over-The-Counter Medications, Prescriptions and over-the-counter medications are also prohibited except under the following conditions: 1. The drugs have been prescribed by a licensed physician for the person in possession of the drugs: and 2. The prescription must be readily available for verifications and 3. The prescription was filled by a registered/licensed pharmacist within the last twelve (12) months for the person possessing the drug or medication; and 4. The drugs or medication are ingested or administered only in the prescribed or recommended therapeutic dosages: and i 5. The employee taking the drug or medication has informed his supervisor of any safety hazard which could result from taking the drug or medication. An employee may, for example, be taking medication which causes drowsiness and should not operate moving machinery or equipment. This would not preclude the employee from performing other job duties but it is the responsibility of the employee to notify his or her supervisor if he or she is taking a medication which could impair his or her ability to perform his or her job duties: 6. The City at all times reserves the right to have a designated City physician determine if a prescription drug or medication produces hazardous effects and may restrict the Job duties performed while using any drug or medication accordingly. C. Definitions. 1. "Alcohol,' is defined as ethyl alcohol. Alcohol, as used herein, includes any beverage, mixture or preparation containing ethyl alcohol. 2. "Illegal Drugst' for purposes of this policy, include drugs which are not legally obtainable and drugs which are legally obtainable but have been obtained illegally. 3. "Detectable Levels' or "Identifiable Trace Quantities" indicates the presence of an illegal or prohibited drug or substance found in the body fluids in amounts exceeding an established cut-off level. Revised 06/27/91 31766 ~V 1n ~ F . eta:.cx uce Page 4 of 12 POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE /ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (COnti-Ued) IREFERENCE TITLE: ANTI-SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND REHABILITATION (NUMBER: 108.12 4. 'Cut-off (Acceptable) Levels' are established by analytical methods in the laboratory to determine a quantitative level of a drug in the body. The specific cut-off level is a standard selected by the testing laboratory and approved by the City to detect recent drug use. 5. 'City Property' or "Premises" for purposes of this policy, includes ALL property, facilities, buildings, structures, and vehicles owned, operated, leased or under control of the city. An employee is not considered in violation of this policy by transporting or possessing alcoholic beverages on City streets if he or she is: a) off duty: b) not operating a city-owned vehicle? and c) is in compliance with all applicable laws? 6. "Alcohol Testing" is testing for blood alcohol content by drawing or collecting a blood or serum sample suitable for laboratory analysis or by a breathalizer instrument device. 7. 'Drug' is a controlled substance, controlled substance analogue, narcotic drug or opiate as defined in Schedules I-V of the Federal Controlled Substance Act, or the Texas Controlled Substance Act, Tex. Health & Safety Code, Chapter 4810 if obtained or used without a valid prescription for the user or possessor. This definition includes but is :ot limited to marijuana, hashish, cocaine, heroin, morphine, codeine, mp barbituratesr hallucinogens and h famines, a e substances chemically similar to these drugs. 8. 'Drug Test" is the collection of a urine specimen by medical personnel, laboratory analysis of that specimen by Enzyme Iaanunossay (EMIT) screening, and confirmation of drug-positive EMIT tests using gas chromatography/m^-'q, spectrometry (OC/MS) methods and procedures, or other medically acceptable technology deemed appropriate by the Cis of Denton. 9. 'impaired' is an employee's diminished capacity to perform duties of the job as determined by the supervisor. 10. 'Reasonable suspicion` is a suspicion based on some factual foundation derived from the surrounding circumstances as interpreted in light of past experience and knowledge. 11. "safety Sensitive position' means a job where an employee's use of drugs or alcohol could create a threat to safety whereby the employee's ability to perform assigned duties is impaired and the performance of those duties in such mental or physical condition creates or could create a safety hazard that has caused, or could cause injury or harm to the employee or other employees or citizens or damage to property. Revised 06/27/91 3176a i Page 5 of 12 POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (Continued) IREFSRENCE TITLE: ANTI-SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND REHABILITATION %MBER1 108.12 D. Conferences. I Employees attending training and conferences may participate in social functions associated with the conference. This may include the consumption of alcohol, so long as the employee's conduct does not reflect adversely upon the City. Employees who consume alcohol at these functions shall follow the law and exercise caution in driving personal vehicles and shall not operate a City owned vehicle. E. Emergency Call-Back. Employees subject to continuous emergency call-back are required to declare to their supervisors the use of alcohol or controlled substances including prescribed medication that might affect their ability to perform under the emergency. The supervisor shall determine if the employee is fit to work and in what capacity, F. On Call. Because employees with 'on call' status are potentially required to be actively working, an "on call' employee is prohibited from consuming alcoholic beverages or using drugs which may impair his or her performance when called back to work to perform his or her duties. O. Use of Substances Outside of Work Hours. An employee shall not use or possess drugs or alcohol outside of work hours on unauthorized city property. An employee shall not use alcohol or drugs before or after work hours while wearing a City of Denton uniform. II. ENFORCEMENT A. Criteria used in determining action when drug or alcohol abuse is suspected. 1. Reasonable suspicion. Whether reasonable suspicion exists to warrant the testing of a particular employee is of necessity determined on a case by case basis, 2, Circumstances which may be used by management and supervisory personnel to determine if a test for an employee is necessary Include but are not limited to the following: a, Observes: alcohol or drug use during working hours b, Apparent physical state of intoxication or drug induced impairment of motor functions e, Incoherent or irrational mental state Revised 06/27/91 3176a G i fV!iu r..'St'q~ Page 6 of 12 POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (Con_t_inued~ _ (REFERENCE TITLEt ANTI-SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND REHABILITATION INU14BERI 108.12 d. Narked changes in personal behavior, or attitude not attributable to other factors e. Deteriorating work performance, attendance or tardiness ' problems not attributable to other factors f. Information received from reliable sources that indicates the employee has been involved in alcohol or drug use g. An employee involved in an accident during work hours which results in injury or death to any individual, more than $1,000 damage to any City vehicle or other vehicle, or damage tr, property if the employee appears to be partially, chiefly, or totally reoponsible for causing the accident or has vio rated a safety rule. For purposes of this policy only, in a motor vehicle accident on a public street, the police officer shall determine whether the employee is responsible for having caused the accident. For other work-related accidents, the employee'f, supervisor shall determine whether the employee is responsible in whole, or in part, for causing tho accident or has violated a safety rule. { h. Other employee actions or conduct that leans to a suspicion of drug or alcohol use such a' preeer-ot, of the physical symptoms of glassy or blood s;: r. oyes, alcohol odor on breath, slurred speech, poor coordination or reflexes, unsteady gait, mood changes, (including inappropriate gaiety or lethargic behavior), unpredictable responses to ordinary requests, etc. to believe that the employee is under the Influence of alcohol or drugs, suffers from substance abuse or is in violation of City or departmental rules, regulations, or procedures concerning the use of such substances. I. Any violation of the city of Denton's Drug Bree Workplace Policy (108.11) B. Job Applicant Testing: General Standard. Upon an offer of, employment, an applicant (including those considered for temporary and seasonal positions) is required to pass a drug screening test prior to his or her final appointment. An applicant will be notified of drug testing at the time of application and will be allowed the opportunity to withdraw his or her application at that time. C. Current Employee Testing: General Standard. 1. Reasonable Suspicion A supervisor may require an employee to undergo drug and alcohol testing if the supervisor has reasonable suspicion that the employee is under the influence of drugs or alcohol during work hours as described in II. A. 2, of this policy, Revised 06/27/91 3176a 4+ If{SRJq~:i ap'ti.41> Page 7 of 12 POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (Continued) (REFERENCE TITLES ANTI-SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND REAABILITATrON INUMBERI 108.12 Supervisors are required to detail in writing the specific facts, symptoms, or observations which formed the basis for their determination that reasonable suspicion existed to warrant the testing of an employee. This documentation shall be forwarded to the Personnel/Employee Relations Department. The a.acts underlying the determination of reasonable suspicion should be disclosed to the employee at the time the demand is made. 2. Final Promotable Candidates All candidates who are offered a promotion (internal employees) to a safety sensitive position will be required to pass a drug and alcohol screen as a condition of his or her final appointment. D. Prior Notice of Testing Policy. 1. The Personnel/Employee Relations Department shall provide written notice of its drug and alcohol testing policy to tll employees. The notice shall contain the following informations a. The need for drug and alcohol testing; b. The circumstances under which testing may be required; C. The procedure for confirming an initial positive drug test result; d. The consequences of a confirmed positive test result; e. The consequences of refusing to undergo a drug and alcohol test; f. The appeal procedures available for a positive test results and g. The availability of drug abuse counseling and referral services. 2, A supervisor may require an employee to undergo drug or alcohol testing without prior notice during an evaluation or treatment period and for a period of up to two years following completion of any prescribed chemical dependency treatment program or any disciplinary action for violation of this policy. 3. Applicants will be notified of the City's policy to conduct drug testing as part of the employment process. When an applicant reports to a testing site for testing, he or she shall first pees<,,it a valid picture identification such as issued by the bepartment of Public of Safety or a passport to the tester. Revised 06/27/41 3176a Page,_ 8 of 12 POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (Continued) _ IREFERENCE TITLE: ANTI-SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND REHABILITATION (NUMBERS 108412 E. Consent. 1. Before a drug or alcohol test is administered, the employee or job applicant will be asked to sign a consent form authorizing the test and permitting release of test results to those City officials with a need to know. The consent form shall provide space for employees and applicants to acknowledge that they have been notified of the City's drug testing policy and to indicate current or recent use of prescription or over-the-counter medication. The consent farm shall also set forth the following information: a. The procedure for confirming an initial positive test result: b. The consequences of a confirmed positive test result e. The right to explain a confirmed positive test result and the appeal procedures availab2et and d. The consequences of refusing to undergo a drug and alcohol test. 2, Refusal to Consent: Applicants: A job applicant who refuses to consent to a drug test will be denied employment with the city. Employees: An employee who refuses to consent to a drug and alcohol test when reasonable suspicion of drug or alcohol use has been identified is subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination. The reason(s) for the refusal shall be considered in determining the appropriate disciplinary action. F. Employee's Right to Request Additional Test. An employee may request to give a second sample of urine or blood 8 at the same collection site and have the sample analyzed at the same or different laboratory under the following conditions: 1. T.he laboratory conducting the test must be approved by the City of Denton, follow the external chain-of-custody procedures as required by this policy, and be certified as set forth by this policy, 2. All coats for a second collection and second analysis must be paid by the employee. Revised 06/27/91 3176a f llF::1'3 SSjj yl i ' p aG: piai 1 Y q•.iahe;,t Page 9 of 12 POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (Continued) IREBERENCE TITLE% ANTI-SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND REHABILITATION INUMBER: 108.12 l , G. Confirmation of Test Results. If the initial alcohol or drug screen is positive, a second test „ of the same sample will be performed ~.o confirm results. An I employee who does not pass the drug or alcohol test may request a { retest of the original sample within tbn days of his or her receipt of the drug test results. The employee may request retesting by the same laboratory or by a second laboratory that is j certified to perform drug tests by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). The originating laboratory must follow the external chain-of-custody procedure outlines in the NIDA mandatory guidelines for federal workplace drug testing programs when transferring the sample. H. Consequences of a Confirmed Positive Test Result. i Applicants: A job applicant will be denied employment with the city if his or her initial positive test results have been confirmed. Applicants who are are denied employment due to a. positive drug test result must wait six months before applying for another position with the city. Employees: If an employee's positive test result has been confirmed, the employee is subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination, as outlined in the City's discipline policy (109.01), 1. Mandatory EAP Referral. Upon the first confirmed determination that an employee is under the influence of drugs or alcohol, the City shall refer the employee to an Employee Assistance Program (EAP) for assessment, counseling, and rehabilitation. Although the assessment is mandatory, participation in a formal treatment program is E voluntary and no disciplinary action may be taken against an i employee for failure to begin or complete an EAP program. Disciplinary action based on a violation of the City's drug and alcohol policy is not automatically suspended by an employee's l participation in an EAP and may be imposed when warranted. Revised 06/27/91 3176a J. t`S. Pa. Page 10 of 12 POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDUREADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (Continued) _ IREBERENCE TITLEi ANTI-SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND REHABILITATION NUMBER: 108,12 J, EAP Self-referral No disciplinary action may be taken against employees who voluntarily identify themselves as drug users, obtain counseling and rehabilitation through the City's Employee Assistance Program, and thereafter refrain from violating the City's policy, procedures and administrative directives on drug and alcohol abuse. K# Confidentiality of Test Results, All information from an employee's or applicant's drug and alcohol screen shall be disclosed only to those with a need to know of test results. Disclosure of test results to any other person, agency, or organization is prohibited to persons not oligible to receive the test results under any applicable law. The. results of a positive drug test shall not be released until the results are i confirmed. The records of unconfirmed positive teat results and negative test results shall be destroyed by the testing laboratory. 1 L, Laboratory Testing Requirements. All drug and alcohol testing of employees and applicants shall be conducted at medical facilities or laboratories selected by the City. To be considered as a testing site, a medical facility or lab must submit in writing a description of the procedures that will be used to maintain test samples. Factors to be considered by the City in selecting a testing facility includes 1. Testing procedures which ensure privacy to employees and applicants consistent with the prevention of tampering 2, Methods of analysis which ensure reliable test results, including the use of gas chromotography/mass spectrometry to confirm positive test resultst 3. Chain-of-custody procedures which ensure proper identification, labeling, and handling of test sampleel and 4. Retention and storage procedures which ensure reliable results on confirmatory tests of original samples. III. MANAGEMENT/SUPERVISION PROCEDURES A. Initial Actions After Appropriate Reasonable Suspicion Determined, once the decision, based upon reasonable suspicion, has been made by the supervisor and in consultation with the Personnel Department, to require an employee to submit to an alcohol and/or Revised 06/27/91 31760 M I I 4 l Page 11 of 12 pOLICYLADMINISTAATIYE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (Continued) IREFERENCE J TITLE: ANTI-SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND REHABILITATION INUMBER: 108.12 drug screen, such screening shall be arranged as expeditiously as possible. The employee is to be clearly directed to submit to the alcohol and drug screening in the form of a direct order from a superior as a condition of employment, with the warning that refusal to so comply can result in appropriate disciplinary action. E The employee shall be further instructed to cooperate throughout the alcohol and drug screening procedure, including following all directions received from medical personnel at the alcohol and drug screening collection site. The employee, in no case, shall be permitted to continue working or remain unattended while screening approval or arrangements are being effected. The department supervisor shall immediately, if during normal weekday office hours (B:OO a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday), notify the Director of Personnel or designated representative in the Personnel Department to arrange for the appropriate alcohol and, drug screening. If the necessity to arrange for an alcohol and drug screening occurs outside these i business hours, the supervisor must contact a representative of the Personnel/Employee Relations Department at an assigned phone number. The employee shall always be escorted to the alcohol and drug screening collection site by appropriate supervisory personnel, or other departmental authority. The employee shall never be permitted to operate a motor vehicle. A departmental representative or appropriate medical personnel shall remain with the employee at all times and shall take the necessary actions to prevent the employee's alteration or falsification of the alcohol and drug screen procedure. The alcohol and drug screening procedure shall include actual observation of the employee's specimen collection by appropriate collection site medical personnel to ensure the proper identification of the employee's specimen. The observation shall be accomplished with appropriate adherence to gender preference and minimal intrusion of the employee's privacy. B. Actions Following Testing. once the alcohol and drug screening collection process has been properly completed, the Department. Director or designee shall be contacted by the departmental representative. The Department Director of designee shall decide if the employee is to be returned to the department in a limited duty capacity or placed on administrative leave with pay pending the results of the alcohol and drug screening. The employee shall not be permitted to Revised 06/27/vl 3176a , Page 12 of 12 POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE /ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (Continued) JREFERENCE TITLE: ANTI-SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND REHABILITATION JNUMBER: 108.12 operate a motor vehicle or any equipment that could present a danger to the health, safety, or welfare of the public, co-workers or the employee. The Director of Personnel or designated representative of the Personnel Department shall be responsible for notifying the Department Director or designee of the alcohol and drug screening results as soon as this information is available. The Personnel Department shall also notify the appropriate Executive Director of the screening results. Copies of the laboratory report reflecting the alcohol and drug screening results shall be transmitted to the aforementioned officials when the report is available, The Department Director or his designee shall take the appropriate administrative and disciplinary actions in accordance with the City's discipline policy (109.01). Administrative action may include referral to an employee assistance rehabilitation program and the imposition of other conditions of employment deemed appropriate by the Department Director. The supervisor may require an employee to undergo drug or alcohol testing without prior notice during the evaluation or treatment period and for a period of up to two years following completion of any prescribed chemical dependency treatment program. C. Supervisor Training. The City shall train supervisory personnel in identifying drug and alcohol use among employees. Such training will be directed towards helping supervisors recognize the conduct and behavior that give rise to a reasonable suspicion of drug or alcohol use. Revised 06/27/91 3176a 1 4. ATTACHMENT A. CITY OF DENTON INFORMED CONSENT AND ELEASB OF LIABILITY FOR \PPLICANT I UNDERSTAND that according to City of Denton policy, I am required to submit a sample of my urine for chemical analysis. I understand that a urine analysis will be conducted by qualified laboratory personnel. ncontrrolled subst.ancespina my ebody THE PURPOSE of this analysis or prohibited odangerous certain non-prescribed and indicating the levels found, Cut-off ab litesein urinerare listed belowntration) detection limits for drug and drug met I CONSENT freely and voluntarily to this request for urine samplesagentia,r0ely and of Denton, their employees, and herewith release the City application contractors from any liability whatsoever arising from this request to furnish urine samples, their testing and the decisions made concerning my app willlbeiremovedulrom considerations for for employment based on the understand the to and undergo this test, employment. hain throughout c the d collection c andsutest ing I UNDE my a sample of identify aRSTANDnd (1) intaegrdocumented process; (2) should my sample test positive, a second, more comprehensive test fir will conducted eliminatefinem frothe results of m consideration tfor employmenttwith the3City confirmation will l of Denton for a period of six (6) months. I FURTHER UNDERSTAND that results ONLY to coDirectorlofePersonnelofor laboratory testing which shall be revealed by the city of Denton, other City officials with a need to know, and the City physician/clinic. Applicant Being Tested Witness Date Emit Detection Limit in Urine List of Druas Tested For 1000 ng/ml *Amphetamines 300 g/ml Barbituates 30C ng/ml Benzodiazepines 300 ng/ml *Opiates 50 ng/ml *Cannabinoids 300 ng/ml *Cocaine 300 ng/ml Methadone 300 ng/ml Methequalone 25 ng/ml *Phencyclidioe 300 n9/ml Propoxyphens *Detection limit in a given specimen will vary members and/or metabolites within thentisted range and will are pres depend on which class *Detection limits have been set per the National Institute on Drug and Alcohol Abuse (NIDA). 2542a/1 L mar-u ATTACHMENT A CITY OF DENTON INFORMED CONSENT SE OF LIABILITY FOR EMPLOYE I UNDERSTAND that according to City of Denton policy, I am required to submit a sample of my blood and/or. urine for chemical analysis. laI underytand t ytl.a blood and/or urine analysis will be conducted by qualified THE PURPOSE of this analysis is to determine or rule out the presence of certain non-prescribed or prohibited dangerous controlled substances in my body rand/or and indicating the levels found. Cut-off level and/orer alcohol sinconcentration) detection limits for drug, drug metabolites, urine are listed below4 to this request for blood and/or urine I CONSENT freely and voluntarily their employees, samples. I freely and herewith release the City of Denton, agents and contractors from any liability whatsoever arising from this request their testing and the decisions made to furnish blood and/or urine samples, of Penton based on the results I concerning my continued employment with the City could be removed from employments with theaCityuofeDenton.is testy Of theanalysis. t understand I UNDERSTAND (1) a documented chain of specimen custody exists to insure the and integrity of my sample throughout the collection and testing identify sample test positive, a second, more comprehensive test procesai (2) should my will be conducted to resultoin rterminationufrom my continuedt employment dwithlthe rm the confirmation coin city of Denton. I FURTHER UNDERSTAND that results of testing are. confidential medical recorfor ds ~j ONLY which shall be revealed by the lb stirs with to. Ddreotor ow, andothelCity the City of Denton, other City o physician/clinic. Applicant Seing Tested witness Date Emit_Detection Limit in Urine List of Drugs Tested For 1,000 ng/ml *Amphetamines 300 ng/ml Barbituates 300 ng/ml Benzodiazepines 300 ng/ml *Opiates 50 ng/ml *Cannabinoids 300 ng/Rtl *Cocaine 300 ng/ml methadone 300 ng/ml Methaqualone 25 ng/ml *Phencyclidine 300 ng/ml Propoxyphene 25 ng/ml Alcohol andmorn will vary within thentisted range and will *Detection limit in given depend on which class metabolites are pr. *Detection limits have been set per the National Institute on Drug and Alcohol Abuse (NIDA). 2542s/2 f > , a 1 N0. DRUG SCREENING RELEASE l~ Person's Name 1 hereby consent to body fluid analysi intoxicants s for alromotion rreview,ndo/or job performance as part of a job application, p ' evaluation. I further consent to allow the results of such testing to be divulged to the City of Denton, its agents, designee or representative. I I understand that the results of this test may be used against me. Date; , 19 . l ~W 1 Witness Signature Person's Signature Place a check mark ( ) next to all of the medications, pills, drugs, or other substances you e unuse derstandithehresults3of your blood and/ormurine tests, used to help the doctor Cold remedies, antihistamines, Alcohol Celusil) decongestants Antacids (e.g., Maalox, Piet pills Antianxiety medications Piet pill ('water pills') (e.g., Valium, Librium) Ant iconvulsant /epilepsy or -Heart rt mededicatations onrine) seizure medications Methadone, (e,g.r Dilantin, Phenobarbital) Morphine ' Antidepressants Op)od elevatorel Muscle relaxants (e.g.r Valium, Eiavil, Imi pram , Flexeril) x ie g r penicillin) Norfle Antibiotics (e Pain medications (e.g., Darvon, Erythromycin, Tetracycline) Codeine, `Tylenol t3) Asthma, lung medications (e.g., Quaalude Prednisone, Aminophylline) Quinine Pills Barbiturates (e.g., Seconal) Sleeping pills, sedatives Blood pressure medications (lee seconal, Meprobamateo) Codei„ ne HCTZ, inderal) Tranquilizers (e.g., Valium, Code Librium) Others not listed abovet (List completely by name of type) used The above is a true Inunderstandithat falsetornincomplete informationeIs cause for past 30 days. for disqualification be maileditoathe City of DentontPersonnel Departments of thn drug screening g will Date__ Signature 2542s/3 ~I Y DRUG SCREENING RELEASE men I` Person taking speci hereby certify that on the day of at I obtained and received from the person who has executed Drug Screening Release No. a This specimen was given for type of specimen the following reason: This specimen was sealed in the presence of the individual providing the specimen. signature Person Taking Specimen Acknowledgment of Person Giving Specimen; Initials or Mark CHAIN OF CUSTODY i I I 1 I 1 I I person Receiving Spec. Location i Date I Time condition of specimen I I I I 1 I_ I I I i I I I I I I i I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ~ ~ I I I I I I 1 I I I I- I I I I I { - i I II j I I I I I I J I - _I I I I 1 I I I I I I I _ I 1 I ! 1 ~ I -1 ! I I 2542x/4 Fy DATE: 07/02/91 Y C41 LL BIPS& FoRM9? T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V• Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Approve a Nesolution on Investigation and Inspection of City Facilities/Equipment Policy (108.13) E £NOp i'IQN ` , It is the staff's recommendation that the City Council approve a resolution authorizing the City Manager to implement a personnel policy on Investigation and Inspection of City Facilitles/Equipment Policy (108.13). This policy is a companion policy to the Anti.-Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation Policy. The Investigation/Inspection policy is designed to assist managers and supervisors in searches of City property, facilities, and equipment when employee misconduct is suspected, SL" WY: City facilities) offices, and equipment are provided to employees for the sole purpose of delivering services to the citizens. Thus, it is appropriate for managers and supervisors to have access and conduct i investigatory searches in instances of employee work-related misconduct, This policy provides procedures for managers and supervisors to follow if it is reasonable to assume that the search will provide evidence of work- related misconduct. It is also appropriate for managers and supervisors to gather information from city facilities, offices, and equipment in the normal course of conducting business operations, BACCKORMD' Because the City of Denton has an interest in ensuring that the day-to-day operations of the City are carried out in an effective, efficient and safe manner, it is important for supervisors and managers to maintain acces,: to the facilities, offices and equipment provided to employees, According to this policy, a supervisor may search City facilities, property and equipment if it is reasonable to assume that the search will provide evidence of work-related misconduct or if It is non-investigatory such as getting a file or other information, The purposb of this policy is not to invade the privacy of employees, but rather to give managers/supervisors the authority to have access to facilities and equipment that is City-owned and to take action if something is discovered in the search that is believed to be inappropriate. 9A "T-EM 09 ~1 MFECTED: This policy covers all civil Service and non-Civil Service employees, j July 2, 1991 City Manager Report -Investigation and Inspection of City Facilities/Equipment Policy (108.13) Page 2 FISCAL 114P There is no fiscal impact in implementing this policy. Respectfully submitted: o V. Flarrell City Manager Prepared by: zTh~lg W. lint ;Director of Personnel jl A5mu it n, E soutivctor f pal S rvices and Economic Development omrptii.prn 8:00a 1 if R (a i etwpdxs\inv*s.f RESOLUTION NO. i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ADOPTING AN INVESTIGATION AND INSPECTION POLICYt AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Department of Personnel for the City has presented a proposed policy regarding employee rules and regulations for the council's ccnsideratiorlt and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt such policy) NOW, THEREFORE, THE CAt'NCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION I. The following policy, attached hereto and made a part hereof is hereby adopted as an official policy of the City of Denton, Texass 108.13 Investigation and Inspection of city Facilities and Equipment SECTION II. The foregoing policy is attached hereto and made a part hereof and shall be filed in the official records with the City Secretary. SECTION III, The Employee Rules and Regulations of 1976 adopted by Resolution of the City Council on February 1, 1977, are hereby rescinded to the extent they conflict with the foregoing J policy and with any administrative procedures and directives issued under the authority of the City Manager implementing the policy hereby adopted. SECTIONIV. Than if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this resolution, or attached policy, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdicti uc o holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECT ON V. That this resolution shall become effective on July 15, 1991. i , 1991 day Of PASSED AND APPROVED this the k BOB CABTIEBER ,Y MAYOR` ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERSr CITY SECRETARY BYi APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi DEBRA A. DRAYOVI-71 CITY ATTORNEY BY., PAGE 2 CITY OIL DENTON PA6E 1 OP 2 F POLIOVAD IIINISTRATIVS PROOSDURVADIIINISTRATIVR DIRSOTIVS PERSONNEL/EMPLOYEE RELATIONS DEPARTMENT REFE,qSEC'sON NUMae3 SUBJECT STANDARDS OF CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES EFFECTJyk?Af5, 1991 TITLE INVESTIGATION iIND INSPECTION OF CITY FACILITIES/EQUIP MTLACES POLICY STATEMENTi The City of Denton has an interest in ensuring that the day-to-day operations of the City are carried out in an effeotivep efficient, and safe manner, The consequences of employee misconduct or incompetence may be severe both to the City and the public interest, City facilities, offices and equipment are provided to employees for the sole purpose of facilitating the work of the City dnd as suoh, are subject to an investigatory search for evidence of work-related misconduct. The term "City equipment" includes City owned offices, work areas, vehicles, lookers, desks, cabinets, and other containers. Employee owned items, such as purses and briefcases, are not included within the definition of this term. The City reserves the right to search the contents of City equipment at any time, and for any reason, A supervisor may conduct an investigatory search of City equipment if there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the search will uncover evidence that the employee is guilty of work-related misconduct and if safeguards are employed to ensure compliance with constitutional and statutory requirements, The searching of City equipment is not subject to the requirements of this policy if the search is necessary only for non-investigatory purposes ordinarily associated with the conduct of everyday business (i,e., retrieving a needed file) provided the non-investigatory search begins in the most likely location and immediately ends when the sought after object is found, Nothing in this policy is intended to prevent the seizure of any evidence of work-related misconduct if inadvertently found in a non-investigative search. Nothing in this policy is intended to prevent the institution of a disciplinary action or criminal charges associated with the possession of such evidence, Employees are prohibited from installing personally owned looks on City equipment, unless a method of opening the look is provided to the employee's supervisor, The prosenoe of a personal look on City equipment shall in no way protect the equipment from search in accordance with this policy, All City employees are strongly encouraged to refrain from storing on or in City equipment any personal article, including personal correspondence, they wish to protect from inspection by City officials. By accepting or continuing employment, each employee is deemed to have consented to unannounced searches of his or her work area upon request, 106W;n Date 06/20/91 i 4 Page 2 of 2 POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (Continued) REFERENCE TITLEi INVESTIGATION AND INSPECTION OF CITY FACILITIES/ NUMBER: 108,13 EQUIPMENT Retention of personal items within City equipment is at the risk of the employee, and the City shall not be responsible for any losses. Searches of employees' personal containers, such as purses, briefcases, and lunch pails will not be conducted without the employee's consent, An employee's refusal to prmit a search of personal containers, however, may result in disciplinary action. i ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURESi A. Supervisory personnel are required to maintain access to all City equipment or facilities within their areas of supervisory responsibility in order to ensure that services are provided to citizens in a timely and quality manner, B. A supervisor may conduct an investigative search for evidence Cifiy equipment of work-related misconduct if he or she (1) has notified his or her Department Director and received approval to search; (2) has notified the Director of Personnel or designee and received approval to searoh; (3) has two or more witnesses available as selected by the Personnel Department; f (4) has excluded, to the extent practical, all uninvolved personnel from the vicinity of the search; and (5) has offered every employee responsible for the City equipment an opportunity to be present during the search, If an employee is unavailable to voice his or her preferences in this regard the supervisor must obtain approval from the Director of Personnel with coordination from the Legal Department prior to proceeding with any search, C. The supervisor shall within 48 hours of an investigative search for work-related misconduct prepare a report documenting the reasonable suspioions relied upon, the date of approval of the Department Direotor, tho notifioation of the employee, the time of the search and results of the search, The Supervisor shall forward a copy of this report to the Department Director and the Personnel Direotor within 72 hours of the search, D. In the event that evidence of work-related misconduct is inadvertently discovered by any person during a non-investigatory search of City equipment ordinarily assooia W d with the conduct of everyday business, the supervisor of the employee ohargod with custody of the City equipment shall within 48 hours of the discovery prepare a report documenting the facts and oiroumetanoee surrounding the di.soovery. A copy of this report shall be forwarded to the Department Director and Personnel Director within 72 hours of the discovery. E. Any employee failing to abide by the termn of this policy shall be subject to disciplinary action, Revision Date 06/20/91 2364k/3 i Fj ~i 1 DATE: 01/02/si CITY NOUL gOORT. 19 i6 Tp; Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager i SUBJECT: Approve a Resolution Changing the Current Drug Free Workplace policy (108.11) i R3's~-c"DATI~.z it is the staff's recommendation that the City Council approve a rug an resolution changing e Dru cy Worklace prohibitioniof alco olDuse Ind Alcohol Free Workplace poli the work environment as required by recent legislative changes, I' Recent Federal legislation has mandated that the current Drug Free Workplace policy adopted in 1989 be revised to include additional wording prohibiting the use of aloohoi. In order to comply with recent Federal legislative changes and to encourage a Free healthy and safe work environment for all empiay~ssbeing ~evgsed to a Workplace policy approved by City Council in 1889 include the prohibition of alcohol. This policy covers all civil service and non-Civil Servic9 employees of the city of Denton, -FIM IMP.A&I There 14 no fiscal impaot in implementing this policy. ES i r July 2, 1991 City Council Report - Drug Free Workplace Policy Page 2 Respectfully submitted: E Loyd V. Harrell City Manager prepared by: Thanes W. Klinok, birector of Personnel Approve Bet oK n, utive Direotar for Municipal Les and Bconomio Development cmrpt12,prn 8:00a i i t3 etwpdoca\drugfraa.r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PERSONNEL POLICY RELATING TO A DRUG AND ALCOHOL FREE WORKPLACE! AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. y WHEREAS, the Director of the Personnel/Employee Relations Department for the City of Denton has presented a proposed policy regarding certain employee rules and regulations for the council's consideration) and WHEREAS, the city council desires to adapt this policy to com- bat these problems; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVESS SEC'~jQN Z. That the following policy, attached hereto and made a ndrt hereof, is hereby adapted as an official policy of the City of Denton, Texast f' .')rug and Alcohol Free Workplace (Reference No. 108,11) SECTION..U, That the foregoing policy is attached hereto and made a part hereof and shall be filed in the official records of the City of Denton with the city Secretary. U&T'ION III, The previous policy relating to Drug Free Workplace (Reference No. 108.11), adopted by Resolution of this Council on June 20, 1989 is hereby rescinded. { PECTION V. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this resolution or policy, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. 5ECT',Q~~. That this Resolution and the Policy shall become effective on the 15th day of July, 1991. 9+ 1 1 1991, day of PASSED AND APPROVED this the - MAYOR BOB CASTLESEItRY ATTESTt CITY SECRETARY JENNIFER WALTERS, BY: APPUovED AS TO LEGAL CITYtATTORNEY DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH~ By l ~i i h i 7 PAGE 2 ~ f E~ CITY OF DENTON PAGE 1 of 4 POLIOVADMINIBTRATIVL PRODIDURVADMINISTSATIVf D1110TIV3 REFERENCE SECTION; NUMBER PERSONNEL/EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 108,11 EFFECTSVE DATE - SUBJECT: STANDARD OF CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES 06/20/89 P~tWised nrLE: RE DRUG AND ALCOHOL FREE WORKPLACE 07/15/91 POLICY STATEMENT: It is the policy of the City of Denton to provide employees with a working environment that is free of the problems associated with the use and abuse of alcohol and controlled substances. The use of alcohol and controlled substances is inconsistent with the behavior expected of employees and subjects the City to unacceptable riske of workplace accidents or other failures that would undermine the City's ability to operate effeot!.vely and efficiently. Noncompliance with the policy set forth below will result in disciplinary action. I. The non-presoripVLve use, sale, possession, distribution, dispensation, manufacture, or transfer of controlled substances on City property or ,otther work sites where employees may be assigned or elsewhere during work hours is strictly prohibited. Further prohibited is the use, sale, possession, distribution, dispeneation, manufacture, or transfer h. of controlled substances on non-working time to the extent such activity impairs an employee's ability to perform his or her fob or where such use, solo, possession, distribution, manufacture, or transfer affects the reputation of the City to the general public or threatens its integrity. Persons violating the City policy will be subject to disciplinary action, which may include termination for a first offense. II. Employees are prohibited from possessing, Consuming or transporting any alcoholic beverages or other intoxicating substances on City property at any time when conducting City business or when performing their Sob duties and responsibilities or otherwise violating policy 108.12. III. Employees who are oonvicted of controlled substances-related violations or alcohol related violations in the workplace under state or federal law or who plead guilty or polo Contenders to such charges must inform the Director of Personnel/Employee Relations or designated representative and Department Director or designated .representative within five (5) days of such conviction or plea. Failure to do so will result in disciplinary action, including termination from employment for a firet offense. Employees convicted or pleading guilty or nolo contenders to such drug-related violations must successfully complete a drug abuse rehabilitation or similar program as a condition of continued employment or re-employment. i i4 V Page 2 of 4 POLTCy~ gIpISTRATIVE PROCEDURE /ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (Continued ) NUMBERS 108,11 TITLES DRUG AND ALCOHOL FREE WORKPLACE "Controlled Substance" is defined to mean those drugs listed in Schedules I through V of Section 202 of the Federal Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 812, and includes, but is not limited to, marijuana, cocaine (including "crack" and other cocaine derivatives), morphine, heroin, amphetawines, and barbiturates. When used in thin policy, the term "drugs" means "controlled substances used substances." The term does not include ursu nt to and in accordance with avalid prescription, pursuant ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURESI I. GENERAL F The City of Denton shall, in compliance with the Omnibus Drug [ Initiative Act of 1988, take those steps required bAyltheemAct t s ensure f that its workplace is drug and elnd►sAlcohfree, ol Free Workplace" policy, and receive a copy of the City's "Drug Appendix 1. Upon approval of this policy, current employees shall be during the new newly employee by the City the policy all persons shall copy of the policy and sh orientation of all receive a copy process. Any employee found in violation of this policy shall be the disciplined and such discipline may include to i ation The City successful completion of a drug prog provides an Employee Assistance Program which is designed to assist behavioral problems that have employees or could adveraely families affect i job performance, ha It. DRUG FREE AWARENESS PROGRAM A. The Personnel/Employee Relations Department shall publish a policy statement notifying al~demployees that the Oity This tted to and policy maintaining a drug statement shall be given to all persons newly hired by the City during new employee orientation. B. The City shall establish a drug and alcohol free workplace awareness program to make employees aware of the dangers of drug and alcohol abuse and the assistance that is available to combat these problems. This program shall include an educational component designed to inform employees of the dangers of drug and alcohol abuse in the workplace, This program shell indfo m and employees of the City's commitment to maintaining a alcohol free workplace. The program shall direct employees to seek assistance through the City'a Employee Assistance Program and inform employees of other community resources available, The polthe icypenalties for, and of further violatig alert the la employees or e this to program oonsequences will 4 Page 3 of 4 POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (Continued) ASF CE TITLE; DRUG AND ALCOHOL FREE WORKPLACE NUMBER; 108,11 C, Employees mush„ as a condition of employment; 1. Abide by the terms of the City's "Drug and Alcohol Free Workplace" policy, attached as Appendix II and, Notify their supervisor or Department Director and Director of Personnel/Employee Relations or designee of any criminal drug or alcohol statute conviction for a violation (or a plea of no contest) occurring at the workplace no later than five (5) days after such conviction. D. A. Department Director, upon receiving notification of an employee's conviction of a violation (or plea of guilty or no contest), must notify the Director of Personnel/Employee Relations immediately, The Director of Personnel/Employeo Relations will in turn notify k the affected Department Director if he becomes aware of a conviction, The Director of Personnel/Employee Relations must ensure that the appropriate federal funding agency is notified of the conviction within ten (10) days after the City was notified of the conviction, E. The Omnibus Drug Initiative Act of 1988 requires the City to take appropriate disciplinary action within thirty (30) days after receiving notice, of an employee's conviction (or a plea of guilty` or no oontest) of a violation of a criminal drug or alcohol statute occurring at the workplace, The disciplinary action may include termination or a requirement that the employee sa+isfaotorily participate in and complete a drug or alcohol assistance or rehabilitation program, or both, as a condition of continued employment, The action taken will be considered on a oaae-by-oasa basis. Such decisions shall include the advice and counsel of the Personnel/Employee Relationa Department and the Legal Department, and the Clty's disciplinary and appeals policies and procedures shall be followed. F, Supervisors who suspect an employee is involved in some illegal drug related activity will notify their Department Director and Director of Personnel/Employee Relations, or designee, immediately to determine appropriate actions. All supervisory personnel shall read and be familiar with this policy and the City's Employee Assistance Program, 1305e 3 n cy~ Page 4 of 4 POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (Coati.nuad) ` - REFERENCE TITLEt DRUG AND ALCOHOL FREE WORKPLACE rNU?SBER1 108,11 APPENDIX I CITY OF DENTON DRUG AND ALCOHOL FREE WORKPLACE POLICY It is the policy of the City of Denton to provide employoes with;d working environment that is free of the problems associated with the use and abuse of alcohol and controlled substances. The use of alcohol and controlled substances is inconsistent with the behavior expected of employees and subjects the City to unacceptable risks of workp".ao , accidents or other failures that would undermine the City's ability to operate effectively and efficiently. The City considers employeos who use such substancea to bo lees reliable and stable and lacking in good judgment, Noncompliance with the policy set forth below will result in disciplinary action, I. The non-prescriptive use, eels, possession, distribution, dispensation, manufacture, or transfer of controlled substances on City property or other h work sites where employees may oe assigned or elsewhere during work hours is strictly prohibited. Further prohibited is the use, sale, poasension, distribution, dispensation, manufacture, or transfer of controlled substances on non-working time to the extent such activity impairs an emplo.yee'a ability to perform his or her job, or where such use, sale, possession, distribution, manufacture, or transfer affects the reputation of the City to the goneral public or threatens its integrity. Persons violating the City policy will be subject to disciplinary action, which may include termination for a first offense, i II. Employees are prohibited from possessing, consuming or transporting any alcoholic beverages or other intoxicating substances on City property at any time when conducting City business or when performing their job duties and i responsibilities (see policy 108,12). III, Employees who are convicted of controlled substanoe-related violations or alcohol related violations in the workplace under state or federal law, or who plead guilty or nolo aratondere to such charges, must inform the Director of Pernennel/Employee iwlationa, or designated repregontative, and the employee's Department Li;?aotor, or designated representatives within five (5) days of such conviction or plea, Failure to do so will result in disciplinary action, including termination from ompl.uyment for a first offense, Employees convicted or pleading guilty or nolo contenders to such drug-related violations must successfully complete an approved drug abuse rehabilitation or similar program as a condition of continued employment or re-employment. I have read and understand the foregoing policies and agree to abide by the terms and conditions set forth, Employee Signature Date "Oontrolled Substance" is defined to mean those drugs listed in Schedules I through V of Section 202 of the Federal Controlled Substances Aot, 21 U.S.C, § 312, and includes, but is not limited to, marijuana, oocaine (including "crack" and other (joasine derivatives), morphine, heroin, amphetamines, and barbiturates. When used i.n this polioy, the term "drugs" means "controlled substances." The term does not inolr,de those controlled substances used pursuant to and in accordance with a valid prescription. "Alcohol" is defined as ethyl alcohol, Alcohol, as used herein, includes any beverage, mixture or preparation containing ethyl alcohol, t'~Or+A S h'.14:iJ!!pi I ' MUNICfPAL BUILDING / DEN TON, TEXAS 76201 /TELEPHONE (9!7)b'66'8309 CITY of DENTON, TEXAS olttce of the Clty socretary k I MEMORANDIJM Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager T0: I FROM, Rick svehla, Deputy City Manager I DATE: June 27, 1991 SUBJECT: Fox 51 Lease Amendment 1 FOX 51 ease i Attavhee also included3daecouple tat d awl gslwhichashowetherexaet E location of the a snew leasn rolation to the ite planeotithe buildings is inoludedstinq buildings. Also, e hangars As we understand it, Fox 51 intends to build she11..tYP that could be finished out to suit as they lease them out, The ultimate plan would include three - 9800' hangars. As we mentioned, this is an amendment to the existing lease. The price of 70 a toot was established wh Counc the o rigin5l,1ease and amendments were agreed upon by il and ox T an additional additional 105,160 square feet will generate $7,362.63 for us each year. we are excited about Fox 51's expansion. The Airport Board twas he also pleased to see this development. They approved concept plan and the amendment to the lease at their meetingl,in June pending the final revision of details by the office. If you or the council has any further questions, I would be happy to try and answer them at your convenience. R cQSve D eputy City Manager RS:bw 5393M Attachments 1 ra_ I ~X15T. ASPHALT D/~ldE o' j 4B ~ -421 /~RONOS6U P~ U 5E~ I HLdC7 L ~r ~ ~1 r 99r~ ~ oolY7~ CONC Anp~N CO go' 0 Ida, CO SIC/r.4~+~UN 3b~ t tr~•. 1 r TO ©rV ~~~Cti SOY L'nsr.rN °w. ~ ...Y~r"~ E.X/S, T_ /~,gpYl~1LT ,r/~'r.O~aAI'.r.tC~E 5'u~wL_~ _ ~ eY✓ 1 i L Ne saver i / pP~ 3 ~ p,X1W p,Y ti : s~,►tL e I y I rl n ; ~ Y N y M ylr r r I! a u~ p e pr• ~i v S ' Y, n_.-.r.s ^d , 'E RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE AIRPORT COM?4ERCIAL OPERATOR LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND FOX-51 LIMITED; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, certain real property upon the Denton Municipal Air- port was leased to Fox-51 Limited, a Texas partnership, by lease agreement dated April 1, 1986; and WHEREAS, the, City and lessee amended the lease in 19881 and WHEREAS, the City of Denton and the lessee desire to further amend the lease agreement; and 'f WHEREAS, the Airport Advisory Board for the City of Denton has recommended approval of the Second Amendments NOW, 'T`HEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: . That the attached Second Amendment to the airport commercial lease agreement between the City of Denton and Fox-51 Limited is approved. rT70N I That the Mayor is authorized to execute the at- tached lease amendment on behalf of the City and the City Secretary is directed to affix this resolution with the executed lease amend- ment to the original airport lease agreement dated April 1, 19860 inscribing on the original agreement the fact it has been amended and the effective date of the amendment. shall become effective imp this resolution That SECTI II. lj mediately upon its passage and approval, 1991. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of - BOB CAST,. BERRY, MAYOR ATTEST., JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DtBR.A A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY r BYs 1. - t T ; SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE COMMERCIAL OPERATOR LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND FOX-51 LIMITED This lease amendment is made this day of 1991; between the City of Denton, Texas, (Lessor) a municipal corporation and Fox-51 Limited (Lessee), a Texas corporation, having its principal offices at Route 1, Box 102, Denton, Texas, 76205, 1 Recitals Lessor owns and operates the Denton Municipal Airport (Airport) in the City of Denton, Texas, In 1986, Lessor leased land at the Airport to Lessee for the purposes of conducting a commercial busi- ness. In 1988, Lessor and Lessee agreed to the amendment to the leas. (First Amendment). Lessor and Lessee now wish to make fur- ther amendments to the lease. Agreement In consideration of the promises of each, the parties agree that the following provisions of the airport lease dated April 1, 1986, as amended on January 2, 1988, is further amended as followsr 1. section It, Lqgsed Premises, is hereby amended to read as followsl It. LEASED PREMISHS_ A. Land - Property A: Lessor leases to Lessee the following tracts of land; ALL that tract or parcel of land lying in the T. Toby Sur- vey, Abstract Number 1285, City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, as shown in Exhibit A and described as follows; COMMENCING at the northwest corner of a tract of land as conveyed to the Nobles Company by deed recorded in Vol- ume 2798, Page 695, Real Property Records of Denton County, Texas, said point lying in the south line of F.M. 15151 THENCE north 88. 331 43" west with the south line of said F.M. 1515 a distance of 265.14 feett THENCE north 014 501 39" west along and near a fence on the east line of Tom Cole Road a distance of 1000.00 feet? 1 THENCE south 88' 09' 23." west a distance of 902.71 feet to a corner on the east line an asphalt taxiway; THENCE north 12° 25' 00" west with the east line of said taxiway a distance of 274.35 feett r THENCE north 77° 35' 00" east a distance of 280.00 feet to an iron pin at the point of beginning of the herein de- scribed tract) THENCE north 12' 25' 0011 west a distance of 240,00 feet to a point for a corners THENCE north 77' 35' 0011 east a distance of 427,15 feet to a point for a corners THENCE south 37' 42' 13" east a distance of 241.03 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 770 35' 00" west a distance of 449.36 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 105,180.55 square feet or 2.4146 acres of land. Together with the right of ingress and egress to the property, in j common with others so authorized, of passage upon the Airport prop- erty generally, subject to reasonable regulations of Lessor. This right shall extend to Lessee's employees, passengers, patrons, and invitees. B. Land - Property Bs All that certain tract or parcel of land lying in the T. Toby Survey, Abstract Number 1285, City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, as shown in Exhibit A, and described as follows COMMENCING at the northwest corner of a tract of land as conveyed to the Nobles Company by deed recorded in Volume 2798, Page 695, Real Property Records, of Denton County, Texas said point lying in the south line of P.M. Road 15151 THENCE north 88' 33' 43" west with the south line of said E'.M. Road 1515 a distance of 265.14 feet! THENCE north 01' 50' 39" west along and near a fence on the east line of Tom Cole Road a distance of 1000.00 feet; THENCE south 88' 09' 21" west a distance of 902.71 feet to a corner on the east line an asphalt taxiway; THENCE north 12' 25' 00" west with the east line of said taxiway a distance of 274.35 feet; Page 2 . THENCE north 77° 35' 00" east a distance of 340.00 feet to an iron pin at the point of beginning of the herein de- scribed tract; THENCE north 77° 35' 0011 east a distance of 389.36 feet to a point for a corner; ( THENCE south 17° 42' 13" east a distance of 115.49 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 55° 35' 32" west a distance of 280.40 feet to an iron pin for a cornert THENCE south 77° 35' 0011 west a distance of 140.00 feet to an iron pin for corners THENCE north 12° 25' 00" west a distance of 220.00 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 73,737.45 square feet or 1.6928 acres of land, C. Development of Tract B. 1. Property B is leased to Lessee for the purpose of future development by Lessee. Upon commencement of development of any property within Property B, the property shall on that date be considered to be an addition to Property A and be subject to the same terms and conditions as Property A, including but not limited to, the same rental rate and adjustments, if any, as if the added property had been with- in Property A from the original date of execution of this Lease. The date of issuance of a building permit by Lessor for the improvements shall be considered the Ifoommencement of development". 2. If Lessee fails to commence development of at least thirty- six thousand eight hundred sixty nine (36,869) square feet of Property B by January 1, 1996, that amount of property shall be automatically be considered as an addition to Property A on that date as if commencement of development had begun on that property. 3. If Lessee fails to commence development of the remainder of the property within Property 8 by January 1, 1998, that property shall be automatically be considered as an addition to Property A on that date as if commencement of development had begun on that property. D. Promises Defined. For the purposes of this Agreement, the term "Promises" shall mean all property located within the metes and bounds described above in Properties A and B, including leasehold Page 3 T I vi, ttj + 16 11 I improvements constructed by the Lessee, but not including certain easements or property owned or controlled by the Lessor. 2. Section IV, PAYMEN RENTALS AND FEES, paragraph A, Land Ren- tal, is amended to read as follows: A. Land Rental: 1. The land rental for Property A shall begin at seven cents ($0.07) per square foot, per year, payable in twelve (12) equal monthly installments in advance, on or before the first day of each month. The rental shall be subject to the adjust- ments contained in this leaae. 3. Paragraphs A and S of Section VIII, LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENT5 are amended to read as follows: y AI ImproveAA~t Requirements. In making any improvements on the Premises, Lessee shall comply with the followings 1. All requirements of the Lessor's Land Develop- ment Code, other than platting requirements, including but not limited to Lessor's Build- ing, Fire, Electrical, and Plumbing Codes, and other Codes and ordinances applicable to the h improvements to be made, including the payment of any fees established by ordinance. 2. Prior to commencing development, Lessee shall obtain the city Council's determination that the improvements conform to and are compatible with the overall size, shape, color, quality, design, appearance, and general plan of the program established by the Lessor's Master Plan for the Airport. 3. Any rules or regulations of the any Federal or state agency having jurisdiction thereof. B. Time fo n Approval by, C The required determination by the City Council that the plans are compatible with the Master Plan for the Airport shall be made by the council within sixty (60) days of proper submission of the plans to Lessor. If the Council fails to act within the sixty (60) days, the plans shall be deemed approved for the purposes of the requirement of compatibility with the Master Plan, but shall not be deemed approved for any other requirment, including the requirement Page 4 1 VI s, s '1 2: xA;Rit 1 to comply with the Lessor's Land Development Code and other applicable codes. 4. Section IX, P. SIG ENT OfLF,ASE is amended to read as follows: 1 IX. ASSIGNMENT OR SUBLEASE Lessee shall not assign this lease or sublet, assign, transfer, nor license all or part of the Leased Premises without the prior written approval of Lessor, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: I ATTEST! JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY1 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY, i FOX-51 LIMITED BY$ ATTESTO BYt SECRETARY Page 5 r ~ €j Exhibit A 1 fR ~TApL~p KIyJ10>q j gSP~At' 427.ts N17"42'13'E c p~V J~ 1 1.44 r ,,rrw YRA~t A„ lid K i 24148 AG. rn e e OR 14 N 0 f tOS,160.66 g0,FY 449.36 11- 42- 13' 'N 389.36 Oil N 17` 2 3' E 4 TRAY pRiV ~ 5.6926 AC. OR N to M t 73 73L96 9Q. FT,~eO gyp' c t~EY ~ ~ 4R1V E off IL. 67 ~ 0 ~ ASPNA~~ 1 fo.a1 fN M 5 1 0 2S W !02.91 IV do o to i10 i ~I t v ~^.•irr.yyrA, ra Fr "Au r ATrAC*R. ' city of Denton p Municipal Building Denton, Texas 76201 Hangar is a Hangar Where No Dotie. Class 1. Group B DtessThe Use of an Open Flame, Welding or the use of is Which Uqui 1 or 2 Ltqutds.. 20 Exterior Walls of Group B Division 3 Hangars Which are Less Then 20' From a Property Line or Lease. Line Shall be of Minimum 1-Hoar Fire Resistive Construction.' -The 20' Requirement Does Not Apply To Building Walls Fronting on a Public Street. 3. A Croup H Division 5 Hangar is .a Hangar Where the Via of an Open Flame Welding or Class 1 Or 2 Liquids May be Required. up H F o Wallsroperty Lineoor LeaseiLine $haHanllgarbesofWhMiich I-HcurhFireO, Resistive Construction, k, 5, The 60' Requirement Does Not Apply to Building Walls Fronting on a Public Street. 6. Where More Than 1 Building Is Located on the Same Lot or Tract of Lsnd• s Property Lino Must be Assumed Bet'Walls een SofltheRPrTherefHangarf thed37' Shown Remains, the West separation red to be of Municsum l-!tour Fire Reslstivo Construction it a Bo e Require Required Minimum of 401 Separation Can be Providedlatrfeen B-3 Hangars ,No l-hour Walls Would be Required. To Avoid 1-Hour Wall Construction Between A B-3 And A H-5 Hangar the Minimum Separation Would be 800. 'Separation between 2 H-S Hangars Would be 12.0' in Order to Avoid I-Hour Will construction. 7 An gxsmple of a ,l-Hour rive Resistive Wall Would be 1 Layer of 5/8" Fire Code Gypsum Board on Each Side of a Metal Stud wall. 6, A Minimum Separstion of 42' Between%Hangars Would Permit a Parking Arragsmsnt as Shown 91 1 Paved t.'eti:ing Space Per 10000 Sq. Ft. of Floor Area is Required for 8aah Havg-;+-;. 10. Every Building Nhers Persons Are Employed Shall be Provided With At Least 1 Water Closet. it, separate Facilities Shall be Provided for Each Sex When theg umbersof Employees Exceeds 4 and Both Sexes Are Employed. In Croup , 3 Occupancies When Toilet Facilities Are ProvidedAt Least 1 Such Pacility Shall Meat Design Requirements for the Physically Handicapped. t ~ `a •~~'t~( 1 a~111 S L yl a rw 1 d•'. -1 -1 i .a.. .:a ] ~ y }wu~~ •jlJrte tf fu+•w•i r . 5 r el 1i.. 1 1 01 }i WJ'' 1 yiH„f, ` f 5Lf f tt , ' P f,+r~3t 4 'J ! ,I. 1 ~jl~ F r i ) 5,55 t f, i1 ,1 A~7 p 14y Y N' i V I ~ 'ty r~~ r ( a 15 • w' rt ~ 5 l }rt ,.Y~ ~'kN R5 r. 1. a5~, Iey~F !i•1 . i n[,y.~Mer ,e:' .,..!-r !.'r I.•~` ♦ r aM)kiy t al lk5 ' ~t fC.ti H15 pN ~N,Lfv 11,116 I 1 I t. y. A.I•` 5 1'!6 1 r t 1 . P w , 12, "Wben Finished 'Grade tiis*.,iiore Landing .i'ShalI Be Provided At Each Exit G.. 4 Than k"..Below •the Foor Threshold in Croup B. Division 3.Occupanoies. 130': Landings Shall Be Provided At Each Exit When Finished Crade 19"Hore Than 111 Below the Door Threshold in Croup H, Division 5 Oocupanciep, i 14, Electrical Wiring Shall 6e installed in Accordance With Article 513 of the National Electrical Coder 15. Floor Surfaces Shall Be Nonabsorbentr 16, 'Septic Tank Permits Are Issued by Utility Department. Contact About Glenn Gary 566-7121. v i.e. Whether M or Not Gary There l is Also Adequate Water mto i Fight a Fire Flo Fire At This Site. P 5 15,{ y 545: q 11 5 ~ lly~ I t • r' Frank Strickler 3aakie Doyle .rEa N,, s 1 Building Official k Jugs' .,7' g, .r u,.,. r Ire. '_T, RV, Ar l.r T r . Wiz... i r MINUTES AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD O~ JUNE 12, 1991 j CHAIRMAN - RICK WOOLFOLK , I THE CITY OF DENTON AIRPORT ADVIAOXY BOARD MET FOR ITS REGULAR MEETING ON JUNE 12, 1991, AT 5430 P.M. IN THE CITY OF pENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CONFERENCE ROOM, DENTON, TEXAS. . I MEMBERS PRESENTS Jay Anderson, Rick Woolfolk, Allis Miller, George Gilkeson, Nancy Hundley and Gene Wright. MEMBERS ABSENT : John Dulemba. j OTHERS PRESENT s Rick Svehla, Deputy City Managers Joe Thompson, Airport Managers and Celina Gonzalez, Airport Staff. appMinute's, of the roved as written,~gular Meeting I. The Board 5, considered Minutes the of May 1 II. Public Session There were no items for discussion in the Public Session. III. FOX 51, Ltd., Building Review The Board reviewed a letter from Joe Thompson# Airport Manager, to Frank Strickler, FOX-51, authorization to proceed with the construction of a security fence around the old north hangar pad site at Denton Airport. Per discussion in the previous Board Meeting concerning FOX-51's construction of three new hangars on Menton Airports Joe Thompson stated that.a Legal Request has been submitted to the City of Denton Legal Department requesting a resolution authorizing in amendment to FOX-514a Commercial Lease Ar,::eement with the City for additional square footage per that survey of FOX-51 Is proposed building site. I i 91 ~ q i D P AF7 Airport Advisory Board June 12, 1991 page 2 and the site survey were reviewed by The Legal document the Board discussed the FO X-51 Boarde in addition, outlined by Jackie Doyle, the requirements as These hangar requirements hangar building Official. FO-R-51 (see city of Denton Buildingoved by Frank Strickler, were reviewed and app attachment "A")- poard Chairman, pointed between out that Sthere h3s trickler lfalk, breakdo' editing FOX-51's Rick WO, that . ad to delays Frank Mr been some communication in exp and the DRGi w acts. Mr- Woolfolk exPlained'to discuss building pro? to Mr. Striokler has failed toatFloolfolDRC k has tsugg he suggested should the building protects. Mr. WC further delayr might the City Strickler that in odto ar, wer any question gsars - Additional attend DRC meetings OX-51's proposed han lira"tion have regarding the Board included an app information reviewed bto the City Economic Development submitted by Joe Thompson Den that the sealer lines or t in torderrthat Department requesting the be extended to the north new dbuildingo be ire hooked into existing buildings and Thompson asked Board Memberquestions evior j sewer mains. Mr. Review and direst any FOX-51's to the Board Chairman or tha Airport Manager. suggestions motion to accept the amendment to (;eorge Gilkeson made a square footage to VOX-51's Commercial Lease for additional I of the building according motion. and t, approve t plan, Jay Anderson seconded the make a the current site unanimously. The Board Will Motion carried Council to approve the building tentatively recommendation to the City Council meetingr plans at the Airport Bo1991CitY scheduled for June 25, IV. Airport Master plan Review eceived two explained that he has receiveoatitwo Joe Thompson the Request for Qual acknowledgments regarding mailed out plane update Master forPlDenton Group letter an rec Airport Master for an stated that the deadline QYOtl s fo Thompson Following this desdlinet Municipal Airport. Mr. 1 for submittals is June 30, 1991. i t { 1 tiu4S:{i.F~ DRAFT Airport Advisory Board June 12, 1991 page 3 review the 1 Rick the Airport Selection commit Groupoufor mthe prcjevt. RFQ's and seiec City planning suggested that in the event Svehla, Deputy Manager, Gro of ups the submit RFQ~s, that it that three or less planning Board to dissolve ee would be in the be p at interest o te the the Selection Committee and a ifi ationsbefore thepAirl @ f Groups to present their 9 the Board found Mr. Svehlas Board. After brief dionMZ• Thompson added that on t recommendation acceptable. Governments July 31 1991, the North Central Texas Council of Governrnenta (NCTCOG) will meet to review the Airpor Fe er l p Aviation that have been submitted to the Administration. Mr. Thompson invited Board members to attend. V. Air~t Manag_ eePOrC the board a, pre-application for Federal" Assistance for Federal , reviewed a summary of the Pre-app NCTCOG Followings z vPlatt iew to the, NCTCOG will make Assistance per th e 1986 on duly 3, 1991 recommendations to the F.A.A. b. ASOS update - Mr. Thompson stated tihea City Council A was esinst 11 tion of n the ASOS. Construction 1991, the Lease of th for app scheduled for August, 1991. id tentatively the Board c. Junep 1991 Monthly Invoice - reviewed by as general information. the d. April, 1991 Monthly Expenditures - reviewed by Board as general information. Mr. Thompson stated that e. Drainage Improvements - in its final the Infield Drainage project is currently the week stages and is scheduled to be completed during of June 17, 1991. I KIWI DRAFT Airport Advisory Board June 12, 1991 Page 1 The Board adjourned into Executive session at 6s20 p.m• and reconvened in open session-at 6:45 p.m. Rick Woolfolk informed the Board that the Airport Board/City Council Meeting is tentatively scheduled for June 25, 1991. The Deputy City Manager will be informing the Board on this issue. The Board chairman added that there has been no re-appointments to the Airport Board and that the present Members continue to serve on the Board. Pick Svehia stated that according to on theth Boardy until Counoilt heye arerd reMembers placed aor to serve 4 re-appointed. With no further business, the Board Meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m. i j THE NEXT MEETING OF THE AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD 'IS SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY, JULY 10, 1991, AT 500 P.M. CITY OF DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CONFERENCE ROOM$ DENTON, TEXAS* t ' .J A'17ACiII+ENr A 4.t~r. r?r City of Denton ' Municipal Building ' Denton, Texas 76201 1. A Croup B'D,ivision 3 Hangar is a Hangar Where No Repair Work.19 Done. Which Requires The Use of an Open F1amep Welding or the use of C1aes 1 or 2 Liquids'.. 20 Exterior Walls of Croup B Division 3 Hangars Which are Lea Than 20' From a Property Line .or Least. Line Shell be of Minimum 1-Hour.Fire Resistive Construetton.' -The 20' Requirement Does Not Apply To Suilding Walls Fronting on a Public Street. I 3. A Croup H Division S Hangar is.a Hangar Where the Use of on Open Flame Welding or Class 1 Or 2 Liquids May be Required. Than 4, Exterior ne or Lease Division Line Shall g be a of Hintmum l-Hour Fire From a Property Li Resistive Construction. S, The 60' Requirement Does Not Apply to Building Walls Fronting on a Public Street. f 6. Where More Than 1 Building is Located on the Same Lot or Tract of Land; a Property Line Must be Assumed Between Build ings,-2herefore# if the 37' Separation Shown Remainso the West Walls of, the Proposed Hangsr&Vould Be Required to be of Huntmum 1-Hour Eire ResJotive Construction if a Minimum of 40' Separation Can be Providedeatsleen 9-3 Hangars Yo 1-Hour Wells Would be Required, To Avoid 1-Hour Wall Construction Batveea A 8-3 And A H-5 Hongsr the Minimum Separation Would be $01.'separation Order to Avoid ars Would • tw e d be 120 in e n 2 H-S Hang be Construction, 7, An Example of a !-Hour Fire Reslative Well Would be l Lsyer..ot 518" Fire Code Gypsum Board on Each side of r metal stud tfall, S, A Minimum Separation of 42' Betvoor,%Hangars Would Permit a Parking Arragssant as Shown 9, 1 Paved Perking Space Per 1,000 Sq. Ft, of Floor Area is Required for Each Hangar. 10. Every Building Where Persons Are Employed Shall be Provided With At Lea t 1 Water Closet. it. Separate Facilities Shall be Provided for Each Sex When the 'Number of Employees Exceeds 4 snd both Sexes Are Employed. in Croup •Bo'Dtviai,)n 3 Occupancies Whcr 'toilet Facilities Are ProvidedAt Least 1 Such Facility Shall Wet Design Requirements for the Physically .Handicapped , , ty 41. 9:ncgana Z, r 041 PA%IJ ' A' MMA .Ifrw dt r1ns k M H Nlv~ TIT Vrr, ,,(vr , I C y, •~1 i I'.1 ;Ir1h I•✓•.^~!~~~~ , 1'A X41 ` A I 1•V t 4ty„ 1 i ~,,y. , • 1 • tl,'~~'A J. 1 rs:~;1r,~~1 ti,~ ~ . •{'1 „ ' ' 4Y 1•g I;1~J1?'. 41. ~ te 1-1 It 16. ( ~Y~q 121 "LcndInSI I 'Shall '50 Provided At Each Exit When Finished'Oradi~~is Hole 044 1 4 Than J".-Below ~bs .Foor Threshold in Croup B, Division 3 0 cupar4coa ..1 130'': Landings Shal'( Be Provided At Each Exit When Finished OradeAs:More ; 'Than 1" Below the Door Threshold in Group H, Division S Occupancies. 14, Electrical Wiring Shall $e Installed in Accordance With Article 513 of the National Electrical Code. 15. Floor Surfaces Shall Be Nonabsorbent. , 16. 'Septic Tank Permits Are Issued by Utility Department. Contact Glenn Cary 06.7121, Mr. Cary Should Also Have Information About Fire Flow Le, Whether or Not There is Adequate Water to right a Pire At This Site. % M1 l 1j l + "r ".1% 1. 'All • 1,411' s.s1 ,.,f dtl¢~~,t+'. ty ++In r~, h+M+ elf Building Official AIf aq„ mod, 'l lb. 41 N. . • 1r.. ,..,,..~w~y,'~bprr~>f4~+lj~ 1.. ! r• I v.. } wIu "A YAW i i 1 YY'1Y9IJI . 1 , .1 i • 1. 1 r•.. I ,•y 'f ir4t.AL' IIt .L Y Denton Police Department 221 N, ELM DENTON, TEXAS 78201 M E M O R A N D U M f TOt Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager ? { FROM: Michael W• Jez, Chief of Police DATE; June 20, 1991 t RE; Individual Assigned Vehicle Program (IAVP) Rick, This report was prepared in response to direction from you to compare the Individual Assigned Vehicle Program in the Denton Police Department to the more traditional Fleet Programs used in other agencies. This document contains the results of an analysis based on the best available information. Certainl there ~ is a historical data available regarding the Denton experience. yIndependentrelack of search by such agencies such as the National Institute of Justice or the Police Executive Research Forum has simply not been done. Therefore, this report is a result of a review of the limited existing literature aild actual expenditures of this agency, BACKGROUND Police units for the Denton Police Department, and most other departments, have traditionally been managed through a fleet assignment system, that is, sufficient police vehicles are purchased to meet officer staffing requirements for shifts and beats. The cars, are "pooled" at a central location and assigned to officers as they come on duty. Under this fleet assignment concept, officers are assigned an available vehicle, usually not the same vehicle shift-to-•shift. Most vehicles are used 24 hours a day, seven days a week, for weeks at a time. The basis for this fleet management approach is that while maintenance costs per vehicle are higher, the required number of vehicles can be kept to a minimum. In other words, maintenance costs may be higher, but the capital coats for providing sufficient fleet vehicles are kept as low as possible and can be incrementally adjusted to meet projected long term demands. In 1986 the Denton Police Department found these capital cost coupled with increased operating and maintenance coats were high enough to warrant the exploration of other alternatives, The Departments vehicle inventory was inadequate to Staff existing bent (817) 8888181 METRO 434.2820 60 0 1 AY 2 j allotments and Detectives were having to share automobiles seriously hampering the agencies ability to effectively deliver police servicas. It was decided that the fleet could be increased and maintenance and operating costs reduced by instituting an Individual Assigned Vehicle Program. Likewise, it was decided that capital costa could be reduced by lease purchasing vehicles for three year periods as opposed to purchasing vehicles every year. COfPARISDN OF PROG MM COSTS In order to make valid comparisons between the two plans, it is necessary to determine a common unit of measurement. This common unit of measurement is ussential because the characteristics of vehicle use in the two plans are significantly different. Under fleet plans, patrol cars are available for use a maximum of 21 shifts per week (3 shifts per day, 7 days per week) or 1,092 shifts per year (21 shifts per week x 52 weeks). In practice when idle time, maintenance and repairs are considered police cars are actually in use approximately 18 shifts per week. On average, police cars in a fleet plan accumulate approximately 30,000 miles per year or 33 miles per shift for 936 shifts per year. (18 shifts per week x 52 weeks), Alternatively, a vehicle under an IAVP is available for the same number of shifts as the officer assigned to a vehicle, Since a police officer works an average of five shifts for 48 weeks per year, the patrol car is actually utilized for 240 shifts per year. At 33 miles per shift, an IAVP vehicle will be driven approximately 7,920 miles per year. We add this to a projected "off-duty" annual mileage of 1,028, fora total mileage of 8,949 miles per IAVP per year.. In order to make a valid cost comparison, the current "mileas•^ dependent" charges' (fuel and maintenance) for fleet vehicles need to be estimated. These data for Denton vehicles are simply not available and records of existing pool vehicles can not be used since their useage is no doubt dramatically different as a result of our IAVP program. However, Arlington Police Department places their mileagefdependenanance. costs for a fleet program at 14 cents per mile for fuel and 54 Pat mile Obviously these numbers could vary dramatically depending upon rates charged by the respective Fleet Services Department, With that in mind, using the 14/5 equation, mileage dependent charges for fleet vehicles can be estimated at $4,2LO.00 for fuel and $L,500.00 for maintenance. Since in service miles would be the same under an IAVP as the Fleet Plan, than the per mile coats should remain the same. However, the total. number of miles will be considerably lower for the take home vehicle, Additionally, since actual expenditures for mileage dependant costs were available we chose to use those figures for this report. It should be noted that maintenance costa used include expenses due to automobile accidents, A factor which Arlington does not include in their 50 cost, Therefore, under the Denton IAVP, with a projected mileage of 8949 miles par year, fuel cost are $1,306.00 maintenance costs are $1,420.00, A comparison of per vehicle costs incurred in a year of either plan is shown below! Pleat Plan IAVP Fuel 4,210,00 1,306,00 Maintenance 11500.00 1,420.00 5,710.00 21726.00 , In order to complete an analysis and fully assess the relative coats of both programs a cost comparison should be extended o-er time to account for vehicle replacement cycles. Unfortunately this can not be done using an empirical methodology due to a lack of historical data. It can be said that a review of existing literature re- garding IAVP's indicates the most prohibitive factor regarding such plans are their implementation costs; a cost which Denton as already incurred. Under the current IAVP tha Department has 88 vehicles that are operated by 104 commissioned officers, parking enforcement personnel and reserve police officers. Fourteen of the vehicles are pool vehicles, two are reserve officer cars and two are parking enforcement vehicles, leaving 70 vehicles assigned as take home units. If the Department were to immediately return to a Fleet Plan it would require 61 ; vehicles to support the beat allignment and personnel staffing currently in operation. In orther words, we would be able to reduce the fleet by 27 vehicles. The immediate impact would be a reduction of FY '91-192 budget by $22,800.00 in re- placemnnt vehicle costs (Account #8507) and the availability of 14 other vehicles that could be disposed of, These vehicles range in age from 11 years to 4 years old and would probably bring less than $2,000.00 per unit for an additional $28,000.000. The combined savings in FY '91-192 would be approximately $50,800.00. Z r However, one needs to consider the impact of such a decision based on mileage dependant costs and several other important factors. Whether the City decides to continue the i IAVP or revert to a Fleet Plan thirty six vehicles would remain unaffected and should i- continue being leased, These cars are investigative units, crime prevention units, crime scene search units and administrative vehicles. The net effect is that under the IAVP program 52 vehicles are assigned to the patrol function while under the fleet Plan 25 vehicles would be assigned to the patrol function. Therefore, if one accepts the mileage dependant costs cited earlier in this report per vehicle costs for both plans would be as followaf f Fleet Plan IAVP Mileage dependant costs $5,710 $2,726 Number of units x 25 x 52 $142,750 $141,752 Which yields a $999.00 yearly savings under the IAVP program for mileage dependant costs while allowing the department to maintain a much larger fleet increasing our response capability. Although the Department would recognize a $50,800.00 saving in FY 191-'92 budget year it could axpeat a $181,250.00 expenditure in FY '92-'93 and each year following for the replacement of twelve fleet vehicles since the expected life of vehicles assigned to a fleet plan is two years maximum. Under the current lease program vehicle procurement costs are about $196,300,00 annually, This section would not be complete without an explanation of the "off-duty" costa , and benefits associated with an IAVP. A total of 39,000 miles were driven by "off-duty" personnel at a projected costs of $4,800.00. So an additional $4,800.00 could be saved by discontinuing the IAVP. However, that $4,800.00 dollar mileage dependant costs re- 1 sulted in a considerable amount of uncompensated man hours. Since officers are required and do respond to some incidents while driving units off-duty it amounts to increaso' police coverage at little or no cost to the City, For examples 1987 1,165 hours (uncompensated off-duty time) x 17.49 (average hourly cost) - $20,375.85 4 - tgpfiy; 1988 1,391 hours x 17,49 - $24,328.59 w 1989 1,306 hours x 17,49 - 22,841.94 During the first three years the Department recognized $67,546.38 in uncompensated duty time as a result of the IAVP, Additionally there are documented incidents were made by off-duty officers who were available arrests for serious felonies where as a result of the IAVP. So essentially the question is whether the $44,800.00a mileage ependent costs are worth the roughly $23,000.00 in additional police SUMMARY After analysis it appears that Denton has incurred the point. costrassociated with IAVP and would be wise to continue the program at anticipated benefits of an IAVP are: Although initially capital costs are higher) thoseacosts have already been incurred and the total mileage dependent costs per vehicle e lower in an . Cars are better maintained and last longer in the care of one officer. Shift ocha-uges nonc or officer increasing visibilitys asiwelleaseimprovittg coverageaofetheal location,, once again beat and manpower availability. Citizens report feeling safer with the police vehicles of off-duty officers parked in residential neighborhoods and apartment complexes. Officer morale is improved because transportation to and from work, nd in soue cases for non work related uses (see attached General Order) is provided by the Department. Recruitment efforts are improved because the IAVP is viewed as another form of employee compensation. Officer productivity is improved because officers are encouraged, and W some cases required, to taks police action while travelling off-duty in police units. In emergencies, off.-duty officers can report directly to the scene instead of a central station to draw vehicles. Increased useage of police vehicles by other municipal departments once they are removed from the Department Fleet. Police vehicles with lower mileage; thereby, potentially reducing liability in cases of fleet accidents. Additionally, I would caution those examining the program nottotunderestimate the qualitative value of the IAVP. Increased feelings of safety on part oi our citizenry is enhanced by the IAVP, as is officer morale, both are benefits which are `pa. ii AYLV:!!! 1 r _ . Ole xarr - 5 - difficult to "cost-out". Likewise the IAVP has certainly made the implementation of the COP's program easier by providing officers with transportation to and from the many community meetings they are now required to attend. Additionally, the IAVP j has ensured the availability of sufficient numbers of vehicles for the myriad of new programs associated with COP's. 1 In closing, I would say that had the Department not already absorbed the implementation coats such a program might be questionable. However, at this point the maintenance costs of such are program are reasonable and justifiable when all of the benefi[ are ~ examinFd, i , Please let me know if you require additional information. f f espectfully, . I W Je'z , Chief of olic C w , DENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT REFERENCE GENERAL ORDER NUMBER: 89-12 EFFECTIVE DATE: SUBJECT. Individually Assigned Vehicle Plan September 20, 1989 tt This Order consists of the following numbered sectionsi f I. Purpose rG 11. Policy III. Objectives IV. General Regulations V. Reporting Procedures VI. Release and Indemnification of Claims VII. Effective Date 1. PURPOSE The purpose of this Order is to establish policy and regulations regarding the assignment and use of departmental vehicles designated as take home vehicles. i 11, POLICY The Denton Police Department may assign departmental vehicles to individual employees for take home. Such assignment is to be viewed as a errivilege and not as an employment right. Vehicle assignments may be revoked, modified, suspended, or denied when such 'action would be in the best interests of the department, as determined by the Chief of Police. III, OBJECTIVES The objectives of the program aret A. To enhance public safety through increased police visibility on the streets of the city. B. To maximize the quality of vehicle maintenance. C. To provide quick and effective response to disasters, disorders, or other incidents which may requtra the recall of off-duty personnel, D. To enhance the ability of the department to provide police service commensurate with the need for sash service, 6 S tkt43rtx VA. CLASSIFICATION _ GENERAL ORDER REFERENCE NUMBER: gg_i2 SUBJECT: Individually Assigned PAGE 2 OF 7 Vehicle Plan 1 IV. GENERAL REGULATIONS A. Vehicle Assignment 1, Vehicles will be assigned by the Division Commander and the Chief of Police. 2. Vehicle assignments will be made based on., a. Job assignment b. Seniority c. Residence location d. The best interests of the department 3. Officers must reside within the corporate city limits of Denton to be eligible for assignment (effective on and after revision date of this Order). 4. Where there are two or more officers living in the same household, only one vehicle will be assigned per household unit. No more than two vehicles will be assigned to I officers living in the same apartment complex or mobile home park or on the same street in such close proximity that assignment is not consistent with the intent of this policy. 5. Violation of any of the provisions of this order may result in revocation or suspension of off-duty privileges. 6. Off-duty Operation 1, Officers are authorized to use take home vehicles for personal errands within the city of Denton, consistent with the pro- visions herein. 2. Each member of the department utilizing a departmental vehicle shall exercise good judgement and shall not commit any act or omission which would reflect unfavorably on the department or tend to cause the public to lose confidence in the department. 3. No person other than a commissioned officer of the Denton Police Department or an authorized service or maintenance technician shall be permitted to operate a police vehicle, police r8dio, or other police equipment. C~IX:aaf.~=~ Fi CLASSIFICATION GENERAL ORDER REFERENCE i NUMBER: SUBJECT: Individually Assigned PAGE 3 OF 7 89-12 Vehicle Plan 4. Non-police personnel may accompany officers as passengers when the vehicle is being operated off-duty. Because the 1 officer is subject to recall to active duty at any time, discretion must be exercised in the transportation of civilian passengers, The officer should consider; a. The security of police operations and procedures b. The welfare and personal safety of the passenger, together with the possibility of related liability c. The integrity of the passenger 5. Radio communications shall be maintained at all times while a police vehicle is in operation. The officer will check 14-8 with the dispatcher giving his/her rig number at the beginning and 10-7 when off-duty use is ended. During on-duty use, the officer will use 10-41 and 10-42 and hie/her district designation( ' 6, The officer shall inform the communications center of his availability and shall receive clearance before responding to any call while off-duty. 7. The safety of passengers rests solely with the officer operating the vehicle. The officer shall discharge civilian passengers at a safe and convenient location before responding to any call while off-duty, 8. The use of red lights and/or siren is authorized only when the police vehicle is being used as an emergency vehicle, Le„ when answering an emergency call or pursuing a violator of the law. 9. An officer operating a police vehicle as an emergency vehicle shall do so in accordance with the current Department Directive regulating Emergency Vehicle Operations. 10. No officer shall operate a police vehicle with disregard for the safety of others, Appropriate caution shall be exercised as suggested by conditions of the roadway, density of vehicular and pedestrian traffic, visibility and weather conditions, and other circumstances affecting safe vehicle operation. 11. An officer in civilian clothing should initiate traffic stops or violator contacts on hazardous violations when in the marked patrol car, Non-hazardous violations should be referred to the on-duty officers. , 0 'r 1 , CLASSIFICATION GENERAL ORDER REFERENCE NUMBER. 89-12 SUBJECT: Individually Assigned PAGE 4 of T Vehicle Plan - 12. An officer operating a departmental vehicle off-duty will have a business/professional appearance. He will be neat and clean in appearance. Male officers will be clean shaven. Long pants and shirts or blouses will be a minimum. (No tank tops, T-shirts, or shirts with advertisements on them). Shoes will be clean and no sandals will be worn. The officer is responsible for the conduct and personal appearance of passengers, who shall meet the minimum dress and appearance standards. 13. Police vehicles shall not be utilized by officers or passengers intending to consume or who have consumed alcoholic beverages. No alcoholic beverages shall be transported in the vehicle for personal or social purposes. 14. The vehicle shall not be utilized for carrying heavy or bulky loads. No objects shall be allowed to protrude from the windows or trunk, except in the performance of official police duties; i.e., transporting evidence, theft recovery, etc. 15, Two or more officers assigned to attend the same school, meeting, or assignment shall utilize the minimum number of vehicles. 16. Unattended vehicles shall be locked at all times, 17. Police vehicles shall not be parked in reserved parking spaces. 18. No more than t.vo marked police vehicles shall be parked at one location by off-duty officers except on official business, This provision shall not preclude officers residing in the same neighborhood or apartment complex from parking at their respective resiuencss, shopping at the same shopping center, or attending departmental functions. 19. A police vehicle may be driven to and from a part-time job within the city of Denton, providing the vehicle is not used as part of the employment (except a felony, at such time the officer would go on the Police Department payroll and should notify dispatch immediately). 20. A police vehicle may be driven to and from duty assignments and duty-related assignments. i 1 A ~ rrt~.vca F CLASSIFICATION GENERAL ORDER REFERENCE NUMBER ±SUBJECT: Individually Assigned PAGE 5 OF 7 89-12 Vehicle Plan i C. Vehicle Maintenance 1. The officer to whom a vehicle is assigned shall be fully h responsible for the general maintenance and proper care of the vehicle, and shall refrain from: a. Making anything other than minor adjustments b. Altering the body, general design, appearance, or markings of the vehicle c. Using fuel, oil, lubricant, or other additives in the vehicle other than approved departmental issued. 2. The officer shall, at all times, drive the vehicle with reasonable prudence to conserve it at the highest possible degree of operating efficiency. 3. Any mechanical ac electrical alterations or equipment or accessories added must first have the approval of the Service Center Superintendent, unless otherwise approved by the Chief of Police. 4. Colored sealed beams will not be permitted in the spotlight or headlights. 5. All repairs will be performed at the City Service Center by Service Center employees, or at a place designated by the Service Center Supervisor. 6. No weapon shall be allowed to remain in a police vehicle left for maintenance or repairs. 7, The officer is responsible for insuring that all routine maintenance and required service is performed on the vehicle. 8. The officer shall be responsible for the cleanliness and orderliness of the interior and exterior of the vehicle. 9. All routine servicing, such as cleaning and operational repairs, will be performed on the vehicle prior to assigned active duty. D. Supervision 1. Inspection and supervision of the maintenance and care of a police vehicle is the responsibility of the officer's assigned supervisor. The supervisor will inspect and inventory the take home vehicle weekly. The supervisor will also check to be sure preventive maintenance is being done. `yds , r ~ l hl [!1f.4' 1 4"I SriV~zz .t CLASSIFICATION GENERAL ORDER REFERENOE ER: 89-12 SUBJECT: Individually Assigned PAGE b OF 7 89-i2 Vehicle Plan 2. An off-duty officer operating a police vehicle is subject to supervision by on-duty supervisors. F 3. Any supervisory officer may stop a police vehicle operated by an off-duty officer upon reasonable cause that the officer is operating the vehicle contrary to regulations. If corrective action cannot be taken at that time, the vehicle shall be taken to police headquarters by another officer, Deficiencies will be documented in writing by the supervisory officer. V. REPORTING PROCEDURES Off-duty hours Weekly Report Form: All members of the Denton Police Department participating in the Individually Assigned Vehicle Program will complete a weekly report indicating any use of the police vehicle and any activity in which they become involved while the vehicle is being utilized during off-duty hours. An entry will be made for each innident and the report turned in to the Field Supervisor at the end of a seven-day period. The Field Supervisor will turn the weekly report in to the Shift Commander who will forward the statistics to the Division Commander. At the end of each month, the Division Commander will consolidate the statistics into one overall monthly activity log sheet, which will reflect an activity total for all participating members of the Individually Assigned Vehicli Program, A departmental file shall be established to retain the individual weekly reports, and the monthly consolidated report. VI. RELEASE Officers selected for the Individually Assigned Vehicle Program will be required to have a Release & Indemnification of Claims form signed by immediate family members annually, All others will be required to sign a Release 6 Indemnification of Claims form each and every time they ride. Immediate family is defined as officer's spouse and children. Children eighteen years of age will need to sign a Release and Indemnification of Claims form separately. The Release and Indemni- fication of Claims forms for the immediate family will need to be on file with the Department prior to their riding, all others will need to be turned in with the weekly report. ~ E '~w .Iw.•.. 6tSifiVt F CLASSIFICATION GENERAL ORDER REFERENCE NUMBER: 8.4-12 SUBJECT: Individually Assigned PAGE 7 OF 1 Vehicle Plan VII. EFFECTIVE DATE This Order is effective September 20, 1989. _i 1 z Chie of Pn ice City of Den on distribution: All Personnel Master File i tl r It. MI:.YA IE'i TAKE HOME VEHICLE PLAN - WEEKLY REPORT NAME= (Last, First) M.I.) BADGE NO. VEHICLE NO. TIME PERIOD 19, From To k OFF-DUTY ACTIVITY MILEAGE MAINTENANCE TIME CALL HOW ODOMETER TOTAL DATE DIST, ON OFF CODE REC ACT BEGIN END MILES DESCRIPTION j i 1 . ~s t I ENTRIES DATSSs Give Month and Day ACTS Indicate Type of Activity: DISTs Where Activity Took Place 1 ■ Assigned as primary Officer TIME: Use Military Time System 2 - Aesitted On-Duty Officer CALL CODES Use Numbers on Reverse Side 3 - Stood By for On-Duty Officer Y^W RECs Indicate How Call Received: 4 - Made an Arrest(F-Felony/M-Misd) 1 - On View S - Vehicle Used-No Calls Anawsred 2 - Radio b ■ Traffic Stop 3 - Citizen TOTAL MIL£Ss Indicath Miles Driven ODOMETER: Give Mileage Readings MAINTENANCE: Be Geneva). (e.g. Tune Up) (USE REVERSE SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS) i SIGNALt 1. Accident (Minor) 22. Harras. Phone Calls 2. Accident (Major) 23. Fight .4. Accident (H it R) 24. Emg. Message l Assault 25. Fire Call o. Assault (Crim.) 26. Hospital Call 6. Aband. Bicycle 27. Injured Person 28. Meet Ambulance 1 7. Burg. Alarm Silent i j S. Burg. Alarm Audible 29, Meet Comp. 9. Burg, in Bldg. 30. Parked Cdr b 10. Burg. Inv. 31. Parking Violations 11. Cutting 32. Person With Gun E 12. Deceased person 33. Prisoner-Pick by 13. Demented Person 34. Prowler 14. Disturbance 35, vandalism 15. Disturbance (Dom.) 36, Robbery 16. Dog-Bite Victim 37. Shooting 17. Dog Mad 38, Soap. Person 18. Dog Ord. Vio. 39. Soap. Person (Car) E 19. Drunk 40. Theft investigation 20, Drunk (D.W.I.) 41. Others 21. Livestock Out ADD I T I O N A L C O M M E N T S i i t ~Nr ! ~ t 'LQ$f PROPOSALS FOR OPENING STATION SIX , \ 4 + , rL f ' Y 1 DENTON FIRE DEPARTMENT PROPOSALS FOR OPENING STATION SIX , The bids have been opened for new Fire Station Number Six on Teasley Lane. The bids appear to be in order and it can be expected that the low bid will be accepted. Construction should begin by mid to late summer of 1991. It is E anticipated that Station Six will be ready for occupancy during October, 1992. In order to open the station, it will be necessary to purchase an additional engine, an ambulance and related equipment. Motor pool funds are available for the engine (And we normally purchase an ambulance each year as part of the normal budget process. I The mojor Issue confronting the Department is the stgffing of Station Six. Station five opened without any additional personnel. However, Station Six can not be opened without additional personnel. The fiVre Department is proposing three alternatives outlined in the following pages. Rgure One, below, compares the three proposed alternatives with the requirements of the State Board of Insurance of Texas and the Insurance Services Offtce (ISO]. f $i=3'4[. f 3 i FIGURE ONE I Apparatus and station Requirements i NQ: U' 1W gurrent o t~ option 2 Option 3 Stations 6 6 5 6/5° 6 6 Engines 7 6 5 5 6 6/6' Laddare 2 1 1 03 1 0) Personnel 27 28 18 22 21 18/221 Company staffing 3 4 3 3/4 3 3/4 rrr'sra4ssswzzsaazuasrsuaawszaaasasrarraarrsrwzassuerat+srsasawarsarazraramr■ Notes: IsBi Figures currently based upon population One engine per 10,000 and one ladder per 35,000 2ISO Figures based upon actual survey as of 1-16-90 Neither figure includes EMS or support personnel To maintain 27 people on duty we would need: 27 x 3 x 1.25 - 101.25 101.25 - 69.0 - 32.25 deficiency 3Usss a quint and combines an engine and ladder co. 4Sixth engine in-service for 14-hours a day only SOnly 14 hours/18 remainder of time °Initially 6 stations until stations 1 and 3 are combined, 5 thereafter w~ V. , FIGURE TWO PTI Response doenario $tat4d.Zone g ^=221 scenario 1 gpensrio 2 scenario 3 eoenario 4 Low 60 32 24 31 Medium 23 1.3 13 16 i, High 7 4 4 4 Scenario 3 and 4 are ' scheduled to be run industrial 9 7 7 7 by the end of next commercial 19 10 10 12 week' Univ. 6 1 1 3 Undeveloped -21 ? - y . TOTALS tso 75 65 6o Notes: All numbers represent number of Demand Zones of that type in which initial response times can gQ~, be met. Current 10 2, 3, 4, b 5 Scenario 1 If 2, 31 4, 51 & 6 Opon 06 Scenario 2 1, 20 41 5, & 6 Close 03 scenario 3 20 31 41 5, & 6 Close h1 Scenario 4 New 1, 2, 40 51 & 6 Combine #1 & 3 j PTI is the name of a piece of a "fire station location software" that the staff has used in the past. Essentially, the city is divided into districts called "demand zones." Then, existing and/or "proposed station locations" are added. The software then computes travel and distance times to each zone from each station, That data is then compared to the accepted standards for distance or response time. (i.e., 1.5 miles or 5 minutes) If the standards are met, then that "demand zone" is considered to be covered. a nit N _ONE: Option One is the plan outlined to the Council during their 1989 Retreat. The concept represents a move away from the traditional methodologies of the r~. SBI and ISO Rating Schedules. The plan is to rely upon fewer, betterstged companies that are better trained and equipped than in traditional approaches. LJI11an be oMillerdan Teasley Under Option One, the proposed station would open as planned, For a time six would Stations One and Three would combined d and Eagle. xt in wadditionn~ everal be located near the intersection of Carroll a "quints" or combination engines es and ladders would be purchased in lieu of traditional ladders a engines. When the new quints arrive, the first unit will take the place of Engine adding One and Truck One and subsequent units will e One and he necessity combined, additional ladder companies, When Stations minimum staffing per unit will increase from three to four members per apparatus. This is a much safer and efficient practice and complies with NITA 1500 r~auirements. We would then operate five stations instead of six. Stgffing would be as follows: -TAL ! Quint 2 4 4 8 Engine 3 12 Support Units 2 1 22 In order to stgff Option One, seventeen additional fire fighters will be necessary at a projected annual stgffing cost of $538,000.00• The total anus! operating costs would be $590,000.00.Yt his stiusre r senis a radi rsanen ~nd from the traditional approaches. substitute technology whenever and wherever possible. 1. Better stgffing per company while holding the line on personnel costs. 2. Improved response times due to opening Station Six and relocation of Stations One and Three. 4 e. Three. 3. EEliminates overlap of existing liminates need to renovate Stations nOn One . 5. New apparatus. 6. Preferred by the members of the Department. i a• r.,. ~rrarFS O~pT'IDNOM' 1. political implications of closing two existingn too5* onap, approach. 2. Will result in future key rate penalties for "on-tradid beans up department, nothing extra for contingencies. Stilt deficient by 3' 5-6 per shat per statelnationai standards. S, } 1 i r{$ i MAP I EXISTING FIRE STATIONS a SBI COVERAGES S 4 1 Jf --v ~ M " G ~ k` I II Lou On ■ 3 ` / • EXISTING STATIONS T ND~R CON UC ~s * SEE APPENDIX A F, / EXPLANATION OF / FIRE COVERAGE. / AREAS (CIRCLE . L f1 V }y +iOVERLAP OF RESPONSE DISTRICTS -OF STATIONS IS 3 ® OVERLAP r , ' J l EXISTING STATIONS *xPROPOSEO STATION ~"'ti--• ` OPTION OPTION OPERA7INO MISCELLANEOUS BALANCE IEARLT costs COSTS fUN05 AVAILABLE FORWARD COSTS X%%%KXNNX%%%XKKXNXXNXNKXXXNXKKXKKX%X%%%XX%X%XXKX%X%XXXXXBTATXX%%%kXKKII%N TEAR X%NX%MXK%k%XXXKNXXKKNXNXKk%XKX%XKXKNN%NKKN%X%%XKKkKMMN TRUCKS ADDT'L CONTRIWtIOM BALANCE MANPOWER LEASE MOTOR POOL 3 MONTHS IMPACT OM !5,000 ! BUDGET CURRENT CURRENT 1U70gfAL $150,000 1615,000 PROT CLOTH $38,00 TURN. 643,000 TRA1N1NO 91.92 to (86,000 !61,500 140,000 1190,000 1805,000 5297,500 1507,500 !360,000 70TAL 92.93 1•ENOINE $32,000 1627,500 S35,000 (ENO 3) $32,000 $20,000 $140,000 5330,000 1662,500 $72,500 $590,000 !538,000 TOTAL ~ 93.9i 1•ENOSNE 132,000 !547,500 546,800 (ENO 3) !32,000 $20,000 $145,000 $415,000 1594,300 $4,300 $590,000 $538,000 TOTAL i 94.93 !510,000 946,800 (ENO 3) 1•EM01NE t32r000 $33,200 (NP LEASE) f32 000 U0,00 000 TOTAL 90,000 50 $590x000 1538, $so,mo 505,700 15 $ sS10,o00 1 6,800 (ENO 3) 1 ENOtME 932,000 1 ' $33,200 (W LEASE) , TOTAL $,300 $510,000 $590,000 so s59o,00o 1536,000 $(2x000 96.97 !510,000 146,800 (ENO 3) 1-ENGINE $32,000 IS3,200 (W LEASE) TOTAL !32,000 S"'000 s0 !510,000 !5901000 to SS90,000 $538,000 9i•98 !510,000 !46,800 (ERG 3) (ENO. 3) $33,200 (NP LEASE) MP LEASE 1•ENOINE $32,000 TOTAL 532,000 $0 $510,000 !590,000 so $59o,0oo 5538,000 9e 99 $510,000 U6, boo (ENO 3) 1 EMOIIIE ~ !33,200 (MP LEASE) SOtAI $32,000 5590 000 W 1390,000 $538,000 SO 1510,000 , $510,000 µ6g0 (ENO 3) 1•ENOINE $32,00il 133,700 (NP LEASE) 120,000 J $0 s590,000 $538,000 TOTAL $32,000 $0 1510,000 1590,000 . i OPTION Under Option Two the five existing stations would remain open and a sixth station would open at Lillian Miller and Teasley. Utilizing the PTI Computer Model, initial response deficiencies would drop from the current 50% (75 of 1501 to 43% [65 of 150] FDZ's for a net gain of 7%. See Figure Two for the details. Option Two is traditional in its approach and represents the least amount of change It would require an additional twelve personnel. Three new Captain's positions and nine fire fighter positions would be created. This would allow a minimum crew size of three personnel at all times on all companies. Staffing levels at existing stations would not change. Overall, shift minimums would increase from the current minimum of twenty-two to a new minimum of twenty-five. Mrst year costs would include funds for training and equipping the twelve new personnel. It will be necessary to bring the personnel on by I April, 1992 In order for them to be trained and ready to function by the I October, 1992 station opening. Annual personnel costs would be approximately $448,300 for a full year and total annual costs would be $503,000.00. A11 VANT'ACES OF 1. Improves response times. 2. Provides additional three man engine company. 3. Provides a station in an area which includes the majority of our most expensive homes, the mall and related shopping centers, better access to the State School. 4, Somewhat satisfactory to the members of the Department. ,~r~AnVANT,g TC~ OF QP~T~ 1. Maintains status quo and does not significantly address innovation or productivity issues. 2. Does not address current building renovation needs. 3. Nes not eliminate over-lapping response in Districts 1 and 3. 4. Increase annual costs by $503,000.00. 5. Still deficient by 6 to 7 per sh(/t per national standards. . r a OPTION 1 11TWO . i 4 f 1 00000 •2 . 83 ` F"7 t=EXISIUNG STATION PROPO~ED STATION . lj~ SEE AP I FOR L OVERAGE i / L.~, 14 f OPTION 2 BALANCE YEARLY OPERATING MISCELLANEOUS YEAR FUNDS AVAILABLE FORWARD COSTS COSTS COSTS XXXXXXXXXXKXXXXXKKXXXXXXKXKXXXXXXXXKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXKXXXXXXXXXX%XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXKNXXXKXXXXXXIU(XX%KXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ADDTOL CONTRIBUTION BALANCE MANPOWER TRUCKS STATION IMPACT ON LEASE MOTOR POOL 3 "INS BUDGET CURRENT CURRENT ' 5150,000 8615,000 85,000 91.92 PROT CLOTH 824,000 TUTORIAL 1-ENGINE 835,000 TLNIN. 825,000 TRAINING 840,000 8190,000 5805,000 8459,500 $345,500 $224,000 TOTAL 535,000 854,000 832,500 92.93 5649,500 1•ENOINE 535,000 55,000 (END 3) 850,000 8240,000 $734,500 $231,200 $503,300 5448,300 TOTAL $35,000 $20,000 93.9' $521,200 I•ENOME $35,000 546,800 (ENO 3) $50,000 $290,000 5568,000 564,700 $503,300 5448,300 TOTAL 535,000 820,000 94.95 $434,700 $46,800 (ENO 3) I $33,200 (NP LEASE) I•ENOINE $35,000 580,000 '4370,000 $514,700 511,400 5503,300 $448,300 TOTAL $35,000 $20,000 95'96 $423,400 F 546,800 (END 3) I-ENGINE 535,000 $33,200 (MP LEASE) $42,000 $412,000 8503,400 $100 $503,300 5448,300 TOTAL 835,000 520,000 96.97 $423,300 846,800 (ENO 3) 833,200 (MP LEASE) I•ENGINE $35,000 511,200 8423,200 $503,300 50 5503,300 5448,300 TOTAL 535,000 520,000 97.98 $423,300 546,800 (ENO 3) (ENO. 3) 533,200 (MP LEASE) MP LEASE I•ENOINE 835,000 $100 $4230300 $503,300 50 5503,300 5448,300 TOTAL $35,000 520,000 98.99 $423,300 546,800 (EMS 3) 835,200 IMP LEASE) I•ENGIME $35,000 50 8423,300 $503,300 $0 $503,300 8448,300 TOTAL 834,000 820,000 99 00 5423,300 546,800 (EMO 3) $33,200 (NN LEASE) 1•ENOI" 835,000 50 8423,300 8503,300 50 $503,300 $4460300 TOTAL $35,000 520, MIT i _11A Option Three represents a scaled back approach to Option One. Realizing the current budget crunch, Option Three hires only eight personnel in FY 1991- 92. This option would ultimately lead as to a more productive and innovative approach to flre suppression. The scenario is as follows: * New Station Six is built with a projected opening dale of I Qlgbber,199Z * When Station Six opens, either Station One or Three is closed. We have attached maps which illustrate both scenarios. The engine crew is moved to the new station. * When Station Six opens eight additional personnel are added to provide a sixth engine during peak hours only. * The remaining station is relocated to Carroll and Eagle area. * Annual personnel costs are $311,000.00 the flrst year. Total annual cost equals 403, 000.00. * A citizens task force would be formed to recommend the station closing j schedule, new station location, and ultimately the use of the closed stations. How would this sixth engine operate and why only for part of a day? During 1990, 74.25% of our total call volume was between the hours of 10:00 AM and midnight. In addition, 68.3% of all supply lines laid during 1990 were deployed during these peak hours. If you could not afford to stqff an engine company 24 hours per day, it should at least be staffed during our busiest times. Basically the eightpersonnel would be divided into two four member crews. Each crew would work four fourteen hour tours each week from 10:00 AM to midnight. This would total56 hours, This is the same as everyone else, The overlap would be on Frlday, which is our busiest day. People would be encouraged to take their off-time on Fridays to reduce overtime costs. However, at least four would be on duty. If no one took off, there would be four extra on Fridays, The 6th engine would be used on all working fires and to fill-in at stations vacated by fire or EMS calls. It would essentially be a roving "manpower squad. " h .a 6t7+u~. Mao- 11:z~:ntip( 1 Pi f 1 re , t 1, Lowest in personnel costs. ' 2. Provides same sqffing as Option One during peak hours. I 3. Maximizes productivity. 4. Saves utility and renovation expenses on two existing buildings new buildings more energy efficient. 1. Fails to provide any additional personnel during non peak hours. 2. Political implications of closing two existing stations. 3. Most controversial with Department. l { 4. Deejiclent by 9 to 10 during off-peak and S to 6 during peak times. r 1 5. Can't operate six stations if only eight are hired. x .1 F554:;fl8 `5 r , kl r <x .•zz;~~ OPTION ' (THREE 1 (STATION ~3 CLOSED) 00000 i 4 F I ISO M r Rw T .3 ■ = EXISTING STATION y PROP)SEO STATIO rj , / l rl i 4 .I 41 i FIRE COVERAGE WITH STATION 3 CLOSED r 0 COVERAGEY~0 OVERLAP J 1 N 3~0 J Rely. J GKt M Ier 3 i...~t is I DRLL TOWER 1,.. s t-- ~ ~EXISTMV(3 STATI •UNDER C T V'. II / L i r. j u I OPTION THREE FH: (STA.I CLOSED) V ~»3" I OAK r. f ~w►t to L~ ■3 r --EXISTING TATIONS *=PROPOSED STATIONS t ` fi l,^ 1 Y . . i 3 Fj i FIRE COVERAGE AREA WITH STATION *I CLOSED OVERLAP rr _ \ • 2 I I , r 1 r J ,T , V , / r o9XISTING $TATidIS 6 / PROPOSED STATI , olMaN 4 i G y 3{ STATIONS I a 3 COMBINED V! Nno DAN IT, + . 1 lMl[ M i @EXISTING STATIONS *$PROPOSED STATIO / L rjq~, OPTION i y _ 1 vVVGt'. HVGJ vrl If1 IHI IUN I tk 6 UUM61NE.U RR E~Yy66 K COVERAOEND SB OVERLAP 1 I pol 4 \ \ K T, 2 1 * ~t •nEXISTINO 8TA IONS •w PROPOSED STA~ONS 6 1 .{r F V.,,, OPTION 3 1 BALANCE YEARLY OPERATING YEAR FUNDS AVAILABLE FORWARD COSTS COSTS NNNX%%%NNNNNll)IM%NNNIIKNKKNAIIK%%NXNMNNNJINKKN%)0tl(AANNNNNNKKK%NNN%8%NNNNNNNNNNNNX%NNN%%%%NNNN)OCR;NNMMAxxxxNNN%NX%%%1(%%NN)001 ADDT'L CONTRIBUTION BALANCE MANPOWER IMPACT ON TRUCKS STATION DEBT LEASE 3 MOANS SERVICE BUDGET CURRENT CURB":NT $150,000 $365,000 91.92 !13,000 218,000 PACT CLOTN $40,000 *190,D00 $553,000 $333,000 5222,000 SIS0 DOD TOTAL x/00 $URN, so ss6,ooo 36,oo0 92.93 (TAAI01M0) 3948,000 $35,000 (ENO 3) 1•ENOINE $32,000 $25,000 $215,000 $583,000 $180,000 $403,000 $]11,000 TOTAL $32,000 $60 000 93.94 5423,000 $46,800 1•EMOINE $32,000 $30,000 $245,00 $471,000 $66,800 $403,000 5311,000 TOTAL 332,000 160,000 94.95 $343,AJ00 $46,000 (ENO 3) $51,200 (MP LEASE) I.ENOINE $32,000 330,000 $275,000 $423,800 1120,800 $403,000 $311,000 TOTAL $32,000 $60,000 95.96 1325, 8110 346,800 (ENO 3) 333,200 (MP LEASE) I•ENGINE $32,000 $30,000 3305,D00 S40S,000 $2,800 $403,000 $111,000 TOTAL 632,000 660,000 96.91 $323,000 346,800 (ENO 3) 93$,200 (MP LEAN) 1•E01NE $32,000 $15,200 $320,200 $403,000 60 1403,000 $311,000 TOTAL 132,000 $60,000 91.98 $323,000 $46,800 (ENO 3) (ENO, 3) 933,200 (MP LEASE) MP LEASE 1•ENOINE $32,000 - $2,800 5323,000 $403,600 $0 $403,000 $311,000 TOTAL !32,000 "*1000 -99 $323,000 $46,800 (ENO 3) $33,200 (IM LEASE) I•ENGINE !32,000 110 $723,000 !403,000 60 3463,000 6311,000 TOTAL $32,000 $60,000 99.00 8325,000 3461800 (ENG 3) 333,200 (IM LEAR) 1.1001#1 $32,000 $0 3327,000 5403,000 $0 $403,000 $311,000 TOTAL 02,000 860,000 1 i PROPOSALS FOR EMS RESPONSE 0 0 ENO RE8PON8E1 The Fire Department began providing EMS in 1978, service demand has steadily increased since then. Currently, approximately 774 of all incidents are EMS related. Responses to fire calls increased by only 53 from 1980 to 1990, while EMS calls increased by 91.73. FIGURE THREE Summary of EMS Activity 1990 YTD !91 Total Calls 31682 11687 City Limits 21982 11302 Busiest Hour 17:00 - 18:00 15:00 - 16100 4 of Time 2 or 15.953 16.263 More Units Busy Calls By Unitst A501 1,906 859 A502 61 44 A503 11658 734 A504 51 31 A505 23 23 El 569 189 E2 392 93 E3 613 214 E4 310 98 E5 N/A 65 Traditionally, the department has been primarily a fire department that also provides EMS. Based upon incident data, it would seem more appropriate to become an EMS Department which also provides fire services. Therefore, regardless of the option adopted for fire station staffing a new delivery system for EMS should be considered. Current practice allocates four shift personnel to staff two ambulances. Fire crews provide back-up coverage for the threw reserve ambulances. Therefore, 18.24 of the personnel perform approximately 74.43 of the work, paramedic shortages in the past have complicated the situation. This situation has vastly improlted, however. In 1987, there were 24 paramedics. '-rn 1991, there r,.re 40. It is also anticipated that the two current vacancies and all the new personnel hired for Station six will be trained to paramedic levels. An ambulance from Station 1 or 3 responds to 96.84 of initial requests for an ambulance. In 50.5% of all cases, an engine is simultaneously dispatched from the nearest station according to a r protocols. These are for motor vehicle accidents, heart-attacks, and other life-threatening calls. In non-critical situations, the ambulance responds alone. This obviously increases response time. We propose in the FY 1991-92 budget to upgrade the equipment on the reservi ambulances and respond with an ambulance from every station. Advantages of Revised EMS Procgdureai 1. Improved response time in Station 2, 4, and Sts response areas. 2. Balance the EMS load and reduce strain on Station 1 and 3'e Ambulance. 3. Greater involvement by all personnel in EMS. 4. Allows Captains and other longterm paramedics to maintain paramedic skills. Disadyantagest 16 Less activity per ambulance may result in deterioration of paramedic skills. 2. Increases times when Engines 2, 4, or S out-of-service due to medical calls. 3. Increased anxiety by some employees who do not like to perform EMS work. i r Fi APPENDICES A. SBI Requirements B. Comparison of 1980 & 1990 C. 1990 Alarms D. Supply Lines Laid 1990 E. 1990 180 Survey i . ii r W. P. DAMES, JR, .YNDON OLSON. JR. DURWOOD MIANFORO 14110 60 Cho4r~ mwrbw s^~ b t mils. PAT WAONER e, J, VOORHIS CSW CMrk CunwnlYiomr Of InwMnu STATE BOARD OF IN-SURANCE 1110 SM JACtW O AUSTIN, TEXAS 78786 April 29, 1979 FIRE DEPARTMENT MANPOWER AND KEY RATE GRADING STANDARDS A city's total population determines both its required total number of paid firemen and its required number of first line pumpers and ladder k truck, The number of required first line pumpers and ladder tr0 actually in service then determines the required per-shift manning. Xey to gradusg compares the actual total number of firefighters with the number required, and then compares the actual par-shift mauling with that requirad. Of the two comparisons, the higher deficiency counts. Total city population requires: Manpower - 1 1/2 firefighters for each 1,000 people or portion thereof, Equipment One first line pumper for each 10,000 people or portion there= of, plus a total of one reserve pumper, in most cases. .,r - One aerial ladder truck or equivalent snorkel for each 35,UUU I people or portion thereof, E Fire department manpower grading bases; Total 1 1/2 firefighters for each 1,000 people or portion thereof. Per Shift - Three firefighters on duty for each required first line pumper and ladder truck actually in service. ' Administrators, clerks and dispatchers do not count,as firefighters. To the extent that EMS duty dilutes effective firefighting strength, Key Rate credit reduces, Usually, EMrs who do not answer fire call.q do not count as firemen. Those who answer fire and EMS calls on a first call basis usually receive half credit, but this depends on relative numbers of such calls, station vacation, etc. Small Towns The minimum number of paid men is five in any case. Whert. the paid men are on duty 24 hours every day (living in the station), population requires only one man per thousand. Per-shift manning must be three men for each required first line pumper and ladder truck actually in service in all cases where the town has no standard volunteer department, and In M towns exceeding 7,590 population, volunteers or not, r) j STATE BOARD G'•F INSURANCE AUS71H, TUAS 78756 FIRE STATION LOCATION MIRFM?dM 1. Distance - Every structure should have a station within 1 1/2 miles as the crow flies. 2. Response Time; a. Maximum three minutes to commercial, industrial and heavy .residential (ap complexes) areas. b. Maximum five minutes to single family residen- tial areas. FIRE STATICN LOCATION PROBLEMS 1. Land availability, Though governmental units generally have the power of eminent domain and can therefore condemn land, cities do not usually enploy this power to gain fire station sites. The amount of land needed depends an the type of fire station needed. In a single-family residential area, the station need be no larger than two stalls, living area and parking space, and it can blend easily with the area. In an industrial or commercial area, the station must house more equipment {including a ladder truck) and men, must be more open and mach larger. 2. Public Sentiment. Local citizens often object to a nearby proposed new fire station until they learn that it can blend very well in a community. To propose that an existing station be closed also often provokes protest. Planning station locations involves full consid- eration of possible citizen reaction. 3. Response obstacles. a. Present. These include rivers, lakes, railroads, limited access highways, heavy rush-hour traffic, narrow streets, new construc- tion, airfields, etc. b. Future, These include everything that will appear in the future. A well-located station can be rendered almost useless by a new highway loop. Unused railradd:-, have suddenly become very busy every day with long coal truin.,., A train or truck wreck, invol- ving dangerous cargo, can (and often does) block the only route over or under a road, railroad, etc, c. Location failure, An assumption of future growth can go bad. Ex- pected cio expansion in one direction does not occur, but the city grows in another direction unexpectedly. A station located on wrong assumption therefore either sits idle or must answer calls far beyond acceptable response time, Future growth can be far above or far below predicted rates, with similar consequences. The future character of growth can be mis-predicted. An industrial park, complete with modern airport, may appear after construction of a small neighborhood fire station. A , j j.; r, '\J~ t 1}j nib Aw c.nw Fn sua~~ ~G JJO~OKA L / • 1'EMRI BI~~ VvC 3 Pan"► & Ladder ? A Fn $tation No, 3 Raa~:+d in not&d b drla Area Slnie Fad bt spot paw* R•t Avg / / w r AIK r No raw Yen. ' ry raavonaa~ Tmin Ns bo otd rosw :'e;atu Man C4At i Fro SsNiat" rNy bt bgad ~a sOrtRaa tiinw Man .F• dt~+an tb. Z Fn Suuon °roWtnw I<nrolwd In Track Centrd DOWA RRE STATION LOCATIONS M►xhnum Ftesporm Distance: 1% miss ,yam h4Yinute Reepaw Ti++s; 5 minute SIn<jk FsmYy Rai3enee 3 minutes everything else r< A 4 DENTON FIRE DEPARTMENT A Comparison of 198Q and 19990 Mansur! 1980 142Q tL-$ Population 48,063 661270 + 37.9$ Area 32.6 sq. miles 61 sq. miles + 87.7$ Measure 1480 1990 $ Responses EMS 10921 30682 91.7% Fire 11055 1.108 5.0% TOTAL 20976 4,790 + 61.0$ Measure 1980 }990 fL4 Fire Loss $6310685 $619,531 - 1.9% Inspections 21202 31022 37.2$ ' J Key Rate 18~ i7o1 w 1o$ Stations 4 4 0$2 Engine Co. 5 4 - 20% Truck Co. 1 1 0$ EMS 2 0$ Fire Fighters 84 84 0$ Total Personnel 96 99 (3) + 3.14 1 Set 1982 2 Station 5 opened 1991 i V v .,DENTON FIRE DEP"TMENT ~`1 TOTAL NUMBER OF CALLS PER DOUR. 1990 Time Total s~ Fire Cam EMS C&jlie perDhour 00200 187 35 148 26.7 O1t00 146 21 123 20.9 02:00 116 28 82 16.6 03s00 83 20 62 11.9 04:00 67 14 51 916 05:00 68 15 50 9.7 06200 97 23 74 13.9 07:00 150 31 118 21.4 08:00 180 30 144 25.7 09100 196 47 146 28 10:00 222 56 163 31.7 11100 238 54 181 34 12.100 264 57 201 37.7 I' 13100 237 58 177 33.9 14100 243 61 180 34.7 15:00 271 80 189 38.7 164.00 281 68 209 40.1 17:00 279 53 223 39.6 18200 25$ 79 174 36,4 19;00 269 70 189 38.4 20100 245 55 181 35 21!00 260 63 190 37.1 22100 239 52 179 34.1 23t00 4, _...792 1_/..6 30 28,4 13.1 (avg.per day) Percentage of Calls from 10:00 - 00:00 hours -Tim. To al Fire Calls EMS Cagle 10100-00100 74.25% 76.3% 72.2% Days of week with the highest percentage or calls First Tuesday with 15.54 of total calls EMS; Friday with 16% of total calls 1 DENTON FIRE DEPARTMENT 5" SUPPLY LINES LAID 1990 TIME FOR YNBIIRE$ 08E8 Ng-L 00:00-00:59 2 4.9 1 $ 29,000 01:00-01:59 2 4.9 1 45r351 02:00-02:59 4 9.8 3 82,815 03100-03159 0 0 1 37 000 04100-04:59 1 2.4 ' 05100-05159 0 0 06100-06159 0 0 07100-07:59 0 0 2 96,403 08:00-08:59 0 0 09300-09159 4 9.8 10:00-10:59 3 7.3 11300-11:59 1 2.4 12.00-12:59 2 4.9 13200-13:59 0 0 wj 14200-14:59 2 4.9 15200-15:59 3 7.3 1 16,051 16200-1 6159 3 7.3 17:00-17t59 1 2.4 18100-18159 1 2.4 3 84,880 19200-19159 1 2.4 20:00-20359 3 7.3 21100-21t59 2 4.9 1 25,000 22.00-22259 3 7.3 1 92,789 23:00-21159 41 *99.9 14 $509,289 * Error of 0.1 due to rounding 0. rj f FIRE PREVENTION & ENGINEERING BUREAU OF TEXAS 1431 Greenway Drive, Suite 520 Irving, Texas 75038-2417 (214) 5800096 FAX (214) 550-8870 Jamutry 16, 199A Mr. Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager City of Denton 215 E. McKinney Street Dentarl, Tenors 76201 Survey 42-M693 City of nenton, Texas Dear Mr. Harreils in tscn7oztlance with Mr. 5veY0.ars at the time of our survey of the fire defenses of Denton, we are fc for your consideratien our asmwits partainirg to possible improv~ts the, fire defenses of your city. shese «=nents are based upon a system of analysis which is widely used in the insurance industry, our survey was not for fire insurance rating purposes but to develop fire insuuwnce w4drwriting information for our memksr and subscriber companies. Cmsequently, our marks do not include all of the eleaerks necessary for an analysis by the local authorities of their overall reads and priorities. Thess requested oametts are sukmitted for the sole purpose of assisting your city in planning bVrevem ants in their fire defenses in combination with more specific studies of 10ca1 needs by your staff and ochmtltm tm. The basic guidelines used in our analysis system have been developed from a study of performance employed in evaluating the needsaof th over zany yearso The b of criteria the water system end fire deparhm* is detatmtined from a study of structural conditions within the larger built-up districts of the city. By evaluating the size, ezmestruatiCn and occupancy of buildingsr a basic fire flow is derived which represents the rata of fire flow which should be adequate for mast buildings in the atty. Howaver, it shalld be rioted that there are some buildings for which the naedmd fire flews are greater than the basic fire flora. After the basic fire flow is determined, the cityls facilities are studied to determine if they can deliver the basic fiat flow for a determined period of time. zn your city, the basic firs flow is 3600-gpn for a 3-•hour period. a+'u ~ e t n~ cna-r~mentsrn A Ur. r.~r•.ennrn rrr~in ennuv-r, enn n++n elf" "nn "%0^ rtnr.dell" A Men rn+.n. •IJ.V.W 1 j i a s i SCRVEY 42-M693 -2- QTT OF DENIM, TF.ldIw5 Rkm SUPPLY For the water supply works to be considered adequate under the analysis system used, it should be able to deliver the basic fire flaw of 3500-<A= for a 3-dour period and during that period also furnish ocnS mption demands at the mainn mt daily rate, since production records indicate that the maxinum daily c+mwm; ition rata has been 23.6 million gallons per day (or a rate of 16,400- gpm), the total rate of flow needed for the 3-hour period is 19,900-gpam. Mle arterial mains and secondary feeder mains should be of sufficient capacity to deliver the needed fire flaws to the various areas of the city. The arterial mains should extend to all areas of the city) they should be looped for mutual support and spaced generally at approximately 31000-foot intervals or less. The minimum size distribation main should be 6-inches ari this size used only in residual areas when the gridixon is such that there is not over 600-feet batzaean eormeCticn S to other mains, A 6-inch dead-acid main is not considered satisfactory for supplying fire hydrants. A mininmaa size of 8- inches should be used in dial and high density residential. areas, and this size should be limited to areas with a goad gridiron. Valving of mains should be such that not over 1/4-mile of arterial mains, 500-Peet of mains in commercial areas nor more than Boo-feat of mains in residential areas would be affected by a single break. Before the water available can be fully utilized by the fire department, there must be sufficient fire hydrants in the vicinity of a fire. The number of needed hydrants varies with the fire flow demand but when the spacing is not fi over 300-test in ommamial areas and not over 600-Peet in ono and two family dwelling areas, sufficient hydrants generally should be available. Hydrants should conform with the American Water Works Association standards and the oo v%oicn from the main to the hydrant should be not less than 6-inches in sirze. While street intersections are owmidered preferable hydrant locations, ate hydrants are often heeded with long blocks. All hydrants should be inspected twice yearly and valves should bA inspected annually; ocmplete records should be kept of all inspections. ngrovemsnts which might be made in the water system would include the following suggestions. 1. In order to increase the quantities available for fire fighting, elevated storage should be provided for the upper pressure-plans. 2. All storage units, both ground and Alevated, should be kept as full as possible at all times. Only the average daily minimum storage can be considered to be available for use during fires. M 4 14 EERVEY 42-M93 -3- =Y OF LIFN=r MW 3. Improvement of the distribution system could be aoocas~lished by the following: a. Providing more looped arterial mains in aocordance with the guidelines given above. b. Improved gridinsning of the system, including elimination of dead-end mains which same fire hydrants. e. Replacement of 4-inch mains which serve fire hydrants. 4. as A survey of to possible e mphydrant distribution need to be =xiucted ard a study rovemm VA=e the spacing is considerably in excess of that suggested above, additional hydrants should be installed. S. IrA current preventative raintermnee program should be contir:ued and expanded to inTxove the condition of valves and hydrants. This program should follow the American water works Association guidalines and include as a mini m= a. Semiannual b%spection and servicing of all fire hydrantsi hydrants should be both pressure tested and flow tested, b. At least annual operation of all valves in the system with more important valves beiang inspeoted at least twice a year. 6. Flow tests in the following areas indicate a need for improvements in the distribution system: a. The vicinity of the intersection of Interstate 35W and Sam Bass Street. b. The vicinity of the intersection of Fort Worth Drive and Massey Street. e. The vicinity of the intersection of scripture and Marietta Streets. d. The vicinity of the intersection of Worthington and Schuyler streets near the hospital, a. The Vicinity of the intersection of AVenue B and Maple Street. 7. Maintaining records up to data is essential, particularly those which concerns emergency service. The map of the distril:&Acn system showing mains, valves and hydrants should be eantirara:sl,y updated. Also, records of fire hydrant and valve inspections and repairs should be kept. 6. Emergency power should be provided for the raw water pump: station at Lake Lewisville. • S r, ,k i S 42-MS93 -4- QTY OF 1x q"f T9 l pUT E DEFXZ MENT ds a reiamllable level of protAction under the analysis Fora city to aril stuuld have suitably located apparatus of system used, a fire deport distances for the first due proper t Pms. in, general, the =ximm t~P~L-e Fir sheald not exceed 1 1/2-miles a2xi for the first duce the apparatusif needed, should not exceed 2 1/2-miles. Equa11Y IMortant as is the need for sufficient manPOaer arriving with the apparatus to effect quick suppression of the fire. Generally, 6 men per ~Y are needed at the firs for optimsn utilization of the apparatus, and when the marcpa4ar level drops t:he ability to utilize the apparatus eff~vely is below 4 men per oYr iva training program i9 essential for seriously ingrained. 1118or a of cur evaluation is effective fire graxnd operation Ar hw iq= phase the receipt of alarms and dispatching „ pr, t tthe amar." reeds of your city und,ar our criteria fled by six engine ciceganlee trim laddar"d bii toe •iV-*k-Aoe with -br~~ air hndder ~xvck r'es°xti"e' ?p=avements which might ba mada in the fire department would include the follawing suggestions. 91 in a=ardanea with the proposal by the fire department for better first due response distances, the city should provide two additionAl fire stations: e station 5 which is cL=w tly being erected at the intersection of Bmmie Bras and Windsor Streets should house one engine fir' b. Station 6 should be erected in the sOu Faastxm portion of the city and should house orra engine axpanY' 1 10:` should be r to oEE 7C~r t!h each of tht On a t czeopatiiis. Sara of the additional peraea'msl neeessarY ccepany assigrm nts during vacations, sick leave and other days off could also be used for e*ainisti-ationp training, fire prwm*icn or maintenance duties as available. 11. C.ontirwitxl efforts should be made to imprtive, exp" and intensify the Training shot d include additional bdi n inspections .~v}ne persconal in order that fire fighting l in the city, state pcally reviewed for all major buildings es. t 9s y; i f5 R ,CR= 42-4693 -5- CITY OF DENIM, TMS 12. A fully adequate tm ninq facility should be provided to aid in the training operations. M is facility should include as a mirW= a least a fire building, a 1500 square foot burning pit for petro]eum fit'", a four story (minianxa height) drill tower for hose and ladder evolutions and two fire hydrants connected to an adequate water supply. This facility should be placed an at least a two acre tract. 13. It is highly desirable to test all apparatus annually and after major repairsi these should includa standard service tests of pcaapers and should be in accordance with the reoanendations of the national Fire avtec-tion Association. 14. Also of importance is the continued testing of all hose. This should be done at least annually at not less than 250-psi. 15. ~ continuing effort &ojld be should be made toward iq=oved records/ detailed and =fire a leases kept on file in regard to alarm and responses, fines ted, traini1, apparatus and apparatus test and hose and hoes tes 16. in accordance with the National. Fine Protection Association standards for ~ Public Fire Service Ommomication Systems (NFPA 1221-1989 edition), the ' following improvements should be made: a. The pmrision of emuVency power at all figs stations. b. 'Ilia provision of one additional reserved fire/FMS emergency telephone 1 line for a total of four reserved lines for fire/345 alarms. a. Ths pxovisim of one additional full-time fire/EMS dispatcher so that a total of two fire/EMS dispatchers can be maintained on duty at all times The cooperation given Mr. Arterbury during the survey is greatly appreciated. if any discussion of our migestims is desired, we wish to assure you of our cooperation. If the city has same contemplated improvements they wish to review with us, we are available to discuss the effect the improvements would have upon the city's classification. MIN 11 t a SMM 42-M93 -6- cny cF mnm, Tmu►s t#9] We wand mMest, ham=# that such = t=Platsd c3ianges aLgo be subOitted to the state Hoard of Insu ants for review. Very truly yours, 1 '01 Rzcber~t E. Wrighty P.E, Assistar:t Chief Eriginmr Public Protection mv/cdp oct Mn Rick Svehla-Deputy City Manager Mr. John Cook,Jr.-Fire C,sief Mr. Dave Ham-Director u.". Watsr/Wastewater utilities FIRE PREVENTION & ENGINEERING BUREAU OF TEXAS 1431 Greenway Drive, Suite 520 Irving, Texas 75038-2417 (214) 580-0096 FAX (214) 550-8870 January 16, 1990 i We Jdm Cook, Jr. Fire Chief City of Dwitton 217 W. Mdcinney Street Dw*mo Texas 76202, Dear O=k, Mwlceed is a copy of the results of fire flow testa made on the water distribution aystam at the time of our reoen survey of the fire prot*e, on of your city. The tests were made to datemins the capacities of the distribition wywtm. tly of value ~ i in to the various areas of teas city and they are ilarming ixprovemants for the water systm. i The quantities shown to be available at a 20-pounds residual pressure are the quantities that may be expeeted to be obtained from the mains for fire purpom in the vicinity of these teats under similar comAu ption oonditicuas, 2w test results are forwarded for your information. if we can be of assistance to you cn matters of mutual interest, please do riot hesitate to call on us. sincerely, =a t. Robert; E. Wei Assistant Chief MVinoar M/CdP cc[ Air. C.D. Hamer P.E. Mr. John midson Director of Water/Waste Watar Utilities Water Utilities City of Dsntm city of DW*m 901 A TWas Avenre 901 A T*x" Averse Dwitcno Texas 76201 Denton, Texas 76201 AN ENGINEERINU AND UNDERWRITING SERVICE FOR OUR SUPPORTING FIRE INSURANCE COMPANIES IN TEXAS is J ci I.y DENTO~,j Yr:nr i`1a9 613, MAIN CAPACITY: (MC) IIYOi?ANT FLOU TESTa J O RESIDUAL HYDRANT FLOW HYDRANT a _ e Q O z w j LwC v~Z• d v_ D_ x z w x c- i s a O z V) h w LOCATION a v; N vi LOCATION a w w a' c O u O Q to•zG•69 (~/Qe } {3/47 7 oN IM10641A. 16-T ZIA. 3 H,yb - £ < zw t /Mac 7 Rte,' shST ab 8 ZYz zca,'0 00 Zc7a~ 1 1:+6 4 (3/155) 3/15¢) Gt6NwaJJp ~ " Z. IZ1 to ; "Qw00b10,LQwcg Lug '7Z. 5 r !v ZI/2 34 qA0 17 D 2a00 ) Z/r 2' 3 C2/(o AJJ EVEAS PNw/I1 3 ;a Ji 10 7 I& W I( G HYU wE6T 01= ~I L 3 1840 Q2 Sao -',V J L+A3w7 rS 2w Of, f,+1~ 3) oN w, unmcwslry I.w w 6 X,6 12£~ GNvppE~:jl ry V aJfir OF EI.TDI! 5Y, ON 00 + Piz Pra J cr G5 7 7 SI Pp H t I/2 1 Amt N060, (2/ir5) Z/t4} WoA7131N41ON oN WOATNIN4YDN1IV Z 1/ 17 5 21o f s 6' 29 H REa, 'h- 1 -1 1390 1 160n 35,400 N<A HoSI° 1/z65•BJ (Ih05-A 2'la 70 - ~i Nceit Sw Bawx 3tAf/ Noe-YH 0,10 BANOND !i+ 2.40 hyl 1d` ofilj ) Hgg& Aro 5 oshTA ZI/y zo 76clo 4"- (417-) 4132'/%. 1vcv67 PRA I" 81 1 71 L c z' z5 / 4Scv 35Uo (4/Gas) 2 32. ON iYvAO LG>1~3 64-1 f5 l,'Sre. d 6.i .,<as v t A 11" p, 2 5 rw ae~ 2%2 4 )"130 5 OU 7VDU (?h,U oN N. aovlcA CAamI ) Z'! 3 ON N. dooraA CRCd x, Ji ZGC my,) ?r-d IWO NOAFM OF NDRTr! OR 0} 1: 4 ` AI+ miuq z z "kry , • o I %Ih. 241 Z0 500 4/vl. A) k/us - FJ N AA NCAA S¢ IN APT6J 22Gp MO75 I LI i to Sus' Fn, s JJ~ qh 7 Nn uv (n % 25 2100 z2So ON SNAOY CAKbJ VU to:z , JJ v I F :LOW Zo 1A 17 360 Z506 500 WrIRtAXNT (5M6-0(5/95-A) HOME, W16169 Glommu 2ryY Z'/-L 2, p IN D108 CDMhiH, 16S S60Tt{ OM I?- 10; (3 rn b' F v /e A 54 e-) 24,4o z 50 2/5GJ utileN 7(s (,2./5S) bN If wY 77 ~l!'r JJY,0 7Avax SYOP, I 3,n r 2 Flow 75 3 w. 7 L-35 g 21 ZO 0 17 llzlo~ !F O W D (I/z~ 7 •A1 ( I/zq 7-f) 5/R3/$A GN W. SCA1ArVR3 I ON uI. ScRJPrVA.t , AA d b w[rr or z a5, Jrs Itr Nvu w"r er z 1/ 3 / Z 4 Hv Awo 3/213 M/gg ON 51L.VeA po Er I3hsfjS1 ON 56AcA belH6jil6S 312 ► J~ O1< the 28 8 0 41 z" Z'h -74izt Mao A A D7u 5-re 0 POA• A66ume 0 V010 IN Fu.+w rN cI StRcAv% Fox SreAmEA oura7S . IE DW4 - Tr-57s PSRFoJ2,na:A 13Y 6CNrbN WA79!A p~»warJneWr ~~IU- 3•y ~ENT~n/ Yurlrjggy 613, MAIN CAPACITY: (PIC) HYMMMT FLOW TESTS o w RESIDUAL HYDRANT FLOW HYDRANT a c a z j a w z {A LLJ t W LOCATION c vi LOCATION 0 a MW w 2 h N 'j w Q N OW D I/T/Z146 t lo15on U AALv jrXnAg m a ~ gyp, DW A C1/3lCe~ ~~/!(e'I~ r/i3Ohl Avg 8, !~-T NYI1 I +erm AM 1 rn * , of F vo~d 46 36 nitre: a mA ec (a zl 3,0 9zo 175 5'or!p Ow 0 ~I/3Gi (1/fir) 3/60/$8 Z:uO , W. AI< C¢r AR 73 O IA o 0 R 12 21 z 1 / 5500 3roo pw D (z/7a-s) (z/TL. IQB~ lr•t 6HOMINd CNTR! ON :AAAOLL BWO~ 7T P30 HYD fw M%o 7¢ q IZ-~- kY0 T ORrn 6F l Od ~ Shd Dw 0 I-r=, RANT (Z153-K) 7t, AANTL2/53 -T f 7/ZZ/66 !r Lim Rl Kd l RD+t"e0 i 4z HYD NORTH eF 2174) Alt wf% r R PPIA -1. S 5G a LA ID:G x500 pw0 oN lwnr free AN B3 1:40VAT 1 /,aterOleN aA.r 3/8 /6B NYO NMN of L / Ro +e R Z'/ L 2 79 F 0, ~/dAR P+Tls'.tAU/aT Z oW41D1&n4 OL dF {~'_ANT, 2'~ HYO NertTN /57j~ Ai 6,13 ro $ 41 I JpAel 59e~ 64 Ow D I/i'17 (I/rGl) ~ 2/jo/d8 r HYO`nWSS7 6P 2o3p 22 M , ~ r Z 3 - w r+ I 4%t 20 ~-4d S/Dr" / D W f] K'mAAT (2 /97) (2~i'G~ a/m/8~ W. vNrvgA~nY~ c~ Ze%vurr dAAdr z rn > "A Amm ?a Aa Q4 L , v NYO 1011A'TN I Z. z ` z /SDa 97dO / pWD (31111) 4/29/44 ON 4a00 LA,vo ;CT Z 4 1' rn.x: L HYD eg6T dk -T F M 2 Q~ 2p LSt~G VwD 3/zG r 9/iG: x OLD N*0rM1 oLo NereTN / 2850 25 21 M f3 / ++L fZ 4V7 0 2500 ou~0 (4/fs) (4/7j 1/4191 1510 7 R4A ~A w d 2 KLA Tcxrt I Z (4 /!q) *L ON oAKufNO! + 3T NY10 1574 (YOP M IF k 4 ~L ! Z 3? 4 5c~o DLUD #1401 f/rto~ 4/re8~ 4030 c . q /0 2 E. %t z r0 z Sao T/2 ~B'1 Ol#r~f MOAsG) Iu NY+) Dr! INORiE lI?*~y// Z1d0 of: fhxv;v1,d Ito ~re~T 0r eSld"AL ZV4. 10e) j 4,60 -Z 500 AW06MD MoR Ato meo vo, a im FI.«..nnY4 3rVAM `OA SV40tC/t OVTLE75, { ffr OWD- TEir3 PiAFgvmED AY AWTON WArcR DG WJZYMFN'', -40- 1 k f~ I~ 3 L' i I,y De n1TdrJ - _Yuar 1 4 G13. MAIN CAPACITY- (11C) IIYONAPIT FLOW TESTS J e w RESIDUAL HYDRANT FLOW HYDRANT Q e 2 5 J N u= a 5 W u~ x= w= w 1-24 a: a mw -j N H LOCATION `a vi ° v a i LOCATION g w N w i n c q D u ~ii dN W Dw il MAC . (s/zMS-K) r4Atc l ( RaS VfAt NE j•35E NeAe S•35E f Z i/xo Pe 1 E 4»P ae8 n7>QiN ri/p 0.000 vas-<a,r;/ nvD z - 3-100 IbW D ANduws GeRr(SnTA L5/278~1 ON mAYHIU-44 Z^a ou mAyi0" RDA Neil u°ArNOFi2R'WAe OYD NoR111 ote,0*04Ar 3 r 'o " N v 0 q cA 2. -Z z S I 37o z 500 dw D s/z~ 0/1 I- 6 l++ 64M anss Zu ow SOVTH s os x• ~ 1054 31 t r/ H10 IOTA dF SCAV,' dt os I t 'Ili' 6$ 4 5 40A 30CDWD (6/7a) s/' L) 4 37 r .3 ON PENNSYLVANIA zoaa 7I,/85 PIWNSYLVAN//1 / 5= NsovrM 32- F 35- r 'A Z4c ZSca DWD ~b/,4) ~Ghs} N' /At+7 IL4o ~ 4C 33 z:w " t • 7z z 1 S F4 % r 1,7 L-wo dN HyY 'Dl7y ~6/3y ON NWy 377 /3G R/+4/~ V.4 HYn Sevres OF its HYO ~ovrlf 34 lho e gr -vt 3?- 95'165 2ocn NuD orJ E 467 (o/1,j ON NaiTp 6/123) . Sipd 6`1 ,'7.1(lDRrDRS S,pE Z•55GIBS 1 B/9/BS IV w o Non.Tr4 OP 9%10 CAST /ea ~ 36* 4.445 M - Z 7/1- 41 It6a t o'7' A D R. DWD oN WE67 /171-A) o' e L/ITB) I/iy/~4 ~~c o~z-ysw/I°S s.pC s-arw~ISr vog z,~ „ uY '7D Mta An 7neF 1~ ' 2 I O 9/d PO Owl) Ir/,N/88 x 570 3 :ro rA r' N / 5 u rill Z.. +g9rj 37 35q!J Dw D uucl N4+moo4(4/444-A) (-f/14ve) 7/LW$°I ON CAST SiU L00 Ar Qvs,:u NaAoAoV, Z; rr 200p1,4d MYDNA67N I IQ NvA EAST DF I 225d 3600, DWD 1/21? (I/ll e~ 5/15/89 q I 'r yl SeRfPr, A c 2' 12 5~dq 25' ' AO_TUsr46 FOR A66vmeu vo,D IN FtowoV(* SrREArH Fog 5;1"mir2 ovrLars, Z)W o - c5T-c PZj;"mtD 6Y AI=NTOM WATF-,?- gU PAATmENr MEN i 1.y~er>JytJ _ _ Yu;tr 613. MAIN CAPACITY: (MC) iIY0!iANT FLOW T':5T5 RESIDUAL HYDRANT FLOW HYDRANT d . o ao z u-i J :>r= ~11L m az a w 2 - r. J, O~ z ti ~W w LQCATION n N a LOCATION s N N a a° 4 N Lo 0 W n w a Vj Q H e u+ U. i Tu< R T lGH7lN~ wHia Cx? E ^I7 NmlNto butINL, MAXIMS m I)At LY dioAnwmerpd 4 LAMA RZ 24~Soo ,'Pm Fe 2 14OuR6 ak F 3 l~ov~5 15~~ca 4hx F Rx 4 F}OL125 i 7_-Ie)J jem Fop. 2 EIvv25 j ovR 5 z7oo Gv~ } 4 Ncvv y I I rI U - l pp4 t, f MAJOR BUDGET ISSUES REPORT i ON THE G 1991 -1992 PROPOSED BUDGET E 7 SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 2, 1991 i 1 E j "Dedicated to Quality Service" Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager John F. McOmm, &eC dvo Director of Rim" i I 1 j i3 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1 r 1 1991 1996 V. 11.1 ~ •f Al` rte • ~ i5~ ,~a ,9 •J.; sr ~ L 1 'i~. %a~~ SAS`", rr i. ~l; ~'"i .•.°'•'~1r:Ij/rt r'%~'y'%!°~'. tA;§.l*,7 ~ i ~ i .i~7~•j ~~,,,r; l~, :1. '.ri'r: ~~~•l~'r~',J •:ry• ,1'y1` 4r i i i4 "Dedicated to Quality Servlce" j i», z 1 t 1 i , I CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM i 1ss1-1sss I SUBMITTED TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. JULY 2,1991 LLOYD V. HARRELL, CITY MANAGER ( Vedfasted to Quuallty Servlw# Ili j E w CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1991-1996 The Capital Improvement program represents the City's five year plan for physical development. The Capital Improvement Program is reviewed each year to reflect changing priorities. It provides a framework for identifying capital requirements, scheduling projects over a period of years, coordinating related projects, and identifying future fiscal impact. Formal City Council adoption of the Capital Improvement Program Indicates the City's commitment to the plan, but does not in itself authorize expenditures, The necessary funding mechanisms must be adopted each year to pay for the improvements, This year's Capital Improvement Program process began in mid-February when the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing receiving input t time, tthe he community regarding the Capital Improvement Program. City staff began the technical production of the Capital Improvement document, The Capital Improvement Program requests were due in the Budget Office for review and analysis in late March. The next step was the Management Review phase where the Executive team reviewed the General Government requests and ranked all additional project proposals and the Utilities' staff reviewed i Utility Capital Improvement requests. The next step for the Utilities Capital Improvement Program was consideration by the Public Utilities Board. The Public Utilities Board received a draft of the Utilities Capital Improvement Program in late March and held a work session to review the document in mid-April. The Board devoted attention to the Utilities Capital Improvement Program through the month of May and gave the final recommendations. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the Capital Improvement Program in mid-June and recommended the plan to City Council. The combined Proposed Public Utilities and General Government Capital Program is presented to City Council at the beginning of July as the Capital Improvements Program. The new process for the Capital Improvement Program includes the preparation of a Capital Budget. This is a separate document and will be presented in conjunction with the operation and maintenance budget that Council reviews. The Capital Budget will propose programs and funding for the first year of the Capital Improvement Program and any changes that may be required. This will allow for the full review of fiscal impacts of both the capital projects and operation and maintenance costs. 4 r~ 1 r S!fl • 74yI@•{j' i r I i 1992-1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 UTILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . . . . . . ' . ' ' . ` 13 J ELECTRIC UTILITY . 57 . . a WATER UTILITY... . . . . . WASTEWATER UTILITY, , . , . 85 129 COMMUNITY SERVICES..... . 1 GENERAL GOVERNMENT SUMMARY....... , , 177 i I ENGINEERING . 189 267 DRAINAGE, , 1 i AIRPORT 301 ~ I LIBRARY 323 329 PLANNING PARKS & RECREATION , , 349 301 FIRE.,,..,.,.,.„.,.,.., . Ya. t , Lr r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 1992-96 Utility Department Capital Improvements Plan is based on the January 1991 Utility Department Planning Forecast, which projects a population increase from 69,615 in 1991 to 75,109 in 1996. This represents an average annual population growth rate of 1,5% per year with growth in the 0.6% range for early years and increasing to 2.4% by 1996. The major capital expenditures will be for the upgrade of the Wastewater Treatment Plant to meet the latest EPA regulations, the construction of the Hartlee Field Booster Pump Station and storage tank, the construction of a 10 MG0 Water Treatment Plant at Ray Roberts with associated pipeline, the installation of a water tower in the southwest section of the city, the installation of one new electrical substation in the northwest sector of the city, an addition to the substation capacity at the Airport substation, and the installation of a gas turbine/combined cycle unit at the electric generating station, plus the necessary facility expansions to meet the anticipated 1,897 new electric customers and 1,341 new water customers, The Capital Improvement Plan includes projects for the Electric, Water, Wastewater Utilities and the Community Services Divisions, Since the Drainage Division will continue to be funded from the General Government funding source, this CIP budget will also be reviewed as part of the City General Government capital improvements planning process, ' This CIP document is intended to serve as a guide as it relates to the capital 1 requirements of the Utility and Community Services Departments in their efforts to maintain the high reliability and service quality of the Electric, Water and Wastewater systems, and Community Service Divisions. ilowever, due to the nature of the utility business, a certain flexibility is assumed within the dotument in order to accommodate changes as they occur, The first year of the CIP, i.e., 1992, is fairly certain, but thereafter, adjustments may be necessary in future CIP programs to reflect the changing needs of the city. General - Utilities and Community Services The 1992.96 Five Year Utility System Capital Improvement Plan projects expenditures of $124,116,000 for capital improvements, phis total includes $480799,000 for the Electric Department improvements; $41,040,000 for the Water Department; $20,114,000 for the Wastewater Department and $14,1631000 for Community Services. The majority of the funds for capital improvements will be from the future sale of Utility Revenue Bonds, $71,750,000 and the use of existing revenue and general obligation bond sales, $17,940,000, with some funds being internally generated $21,395,000 from rates, with the remainder from Aid in Construction, $6530000, and other Miscellaneous Sources, $12,378,000, Of the $12,378,000 from the Miscellaneous Sources, $5,433,000 is yV r 1 f f anticipated from the Upper Trinity Regional Water District's 49% participation - in Ray Roberts Water Plant and the remaining $6,945,000 is primarily from prepaid fees to the City's Motor Pool. An overview of each Department follows. { Electric Department The Electric Utility will require $48.799 million dollars in Capital Funds during the 1992-96 period. During this time frame, we expect 1,974 new customers to be added. Capital expenditures required for these customers and improvements to maintain reliable service to the existing customers make up the majority of the CIP projects. r A new substation located in far northeast Denton is planned to be completed in 1992 at a cost of $1,045,000, and the Airport substation is scheduled to be duplexed in 1996 at a cost of $850,000. $735,000 will be used for load management programs during the five year period. Overhead to underground conversion projects are scheduled to be continued as a part of the City's beautification program at a cost of $4.025 million dollars, which includes a special project for University Drive between I-35 and Bell Avenue in 1994 at a cost of $2.3 million. Additional building space for a Central Dispatch facility and Electric Department personnel are scheduled to be completed in 1993 at a cost of $2.64 ; million dollars. A combined cycle 30 MW gas turbine generating unit is projected to be completed by 1996 at an estimated cost of $18 million dollars. { Electric Department-Funding i Funding for the electric projects will be provided from four main sources, 1. Bond funds, $39.125 million 2. Current revenues, $8.502 million 3; Aid-in-Construction, $0.294 million 4. Other sources, $.378 million I Electric bond sales are estimated to be $36.0 million. E Electric Department-Rate Increases i Based on a forecasted increase in energy sales of approximately 2.U% per year, an increase in net cost of fuel and Purchased Power of 3.15% per year, and an inflation rate of approximately 5%, and crediting approximately $2.3 million per year in capacity sales, the Electric Department anticipates the following average monthly residential bills: ' i _ E 2 Y t1:1 tiY 91 92 93 94 95 96 Average Electric Bill $69.46 $69.09 $72.25 $73.27 $76.29 $62.36 Monthly Increase/ (Decrease) $ (.37) $ 3.16 $ 1.02 $ 3.02 $ 6.07 (Source: Pro Forma) These increases are primarily due to increases in the cost of Fuel (i.e., 10% annual increase in natural gas) and Purchased Power (2.7X) which make up approximately 69% of the Electric Department budget. The annual debt service payments represent 6.5% of the Electric Department budget in 1992 and increase to 8.9% in 1996, with the increase primarily due to the proposed $18,000,000 investment in 1995 and 1996 of a 30 MW repowering of the City's Spencer Generating Plant. The funds for capital improvements derived from current revenue range from 2.6% of budget in 1992 to 2.2% in 1996. Water Department The Water Utility will add an estimated 1,341 customers during the planning period (from 16,712 at the close of 1991 to 18,053 through 1996) and will have an average annual customer growth rate of approximately 1.6%. To provide adequate water service, it is anticipated that $41.04 million in capital funds will be required over the next five years. The major projects will be the addition of a ten million gallon per day (MGO) water treatment plant and water transmission line, at an estimated cost of $17,102 million of which it is assumed that the Upper Trinity Regional Water District will fund 499, one booster station and 3 million gallon capacity ground storage at an estimated cost of $2.4 million, one two million gallon elevated storage tank at an estimated cost at an estimated co toof $$449 million, t and Development miscellaneous lWaters Liwater nes at lines estimated cost of $1.250 million. The new water treatment plant will increase the Department's capacity to 35.1 MOO. A detailed listing of planned expenditures is located at the end of this section. Water Department-Funding Funding for the water projects has four major sources: 1. Bonds, $29.114 million 2. Current revenue, $5,126 million 3. Aid-in-Construction, $0.268 million - 4. Other, $6.532 million Water bond sales are estimated to be $220250,000. 3 } 9 1 Water Department-Rate Increases It is anticipated that the Water Department will require rate increases of: 41 92 93 94 95 96 Average Water Bill $27.70 $30.70 $34.40 $37.20 $40.30 $43.50 Monthly Increase $ 3.00 $ 3,70 $ 2.60 $ 3.10 $ 3.20 These increases are primarily due to increased costs associated with the payments for the new water treatment plant and associated transmission line, and the Hartlee Field Road Booster Pump Station and ground storage tanks. A $500,000 annual repayment of an outstanding $4 million water/wastewater debt to the Electric Department will begin in 1992, Wastewater Department The Wastewater Department will add an estimated 1,070 customers d_ling the planning period (from 14,218 at the close of 1991 to 15,268 through 1996) and will have an average annual customer growth rate of 1.5%, { Improvements to and replacements of the Wastewater System are projected to cost $20,11 million. Major capital items include improvements to the Wastewater Plant at an estimated cost of $7.4 million, collection system upgrade at an estimated cost of $4.9 million, sewer l0 replacement at an estimated cost of $1.8 million, collection system infill at an estimated cost of $1.3 million and Development Plan Sewer lines at an estimated' cost of $1,25 million. A detailed listing is located at the end of this section. Wastewater Department-Funding Funding for the wastewater projects will be provided from four main sources; { 1. Bonds, $15.816 million 2. Current revenue, $3.725 million 3. Aid-in-Construction, $0.91 million 4. Other, $0.482 million j Wastewater bond sales are estimated to be $13,500,000. Wastewater Department Rate Increases It is anticipated that the Wastewater Department will require rate increases of; 91 92 93 94 95 9& Average Wastewater Bill $15774 $18.90 $21.71 $24.28 $26.65 $29.24 Monthly Increase $ 3.11 $ 2.81 $ 2.57 $ 2.37 $ 2.59 f i 4 M r l These rate increases are primarily due to the required Wastewater Treatment Plant improvements which result in a 12.2% per year increase in debt service and collection system and fixed asset funding ($1,6M in 1991 to $2.9M in 1996) an estimated 7.2% per year increase in operating costs ($3,8M in 1991 to $5,5M j in 1996) and a 9.3% increase in return on investment 0,9M in 1991 to $1 AM In 1996). Community Services Department This Department consists of the Solid Waste Division which includes - residential collection, commercial collection and landfill, Ora inage Division, and Fleet Services, which includes vehicle maintenance and motor pool, and the Machine Shop, Energy Management is managed under this division, but funded primarily from the Electric Department for any capital projects. The total funding required for the Community Services Department is $14,163,000 of which $5,635,000 is anticipated to be from bond funds, $4,042,000 from current revenue and $4,486,000 from other sources, primarily motor pool funds, Solid Waste Division The Solid Waste Division issues are uncertain at this time, if the city continues to operate as in the past, the major capital project is the expansion of the landfill, starting in 1995, for an estimated cost of $3,500,000. Most of the remaining $1,802,000 is for annual replacement of vehicles in the residential and commercial solid waste collection and heavy equipment replacements at the landfill. The principal capital expenditures for Residential solid waste from 1992 through 1996 are for garbage trucks. In 1992, we are continuing the fleet conversion to rear loading vehicles which are more cost effective than our side load trucks, These vehicles cost approximately $80400 each and, generally, two trucks'per year are purchased, Expenditures in Commercial solid waste are for trucks, upgrade and expansion of roll-off equipment, and for dumpsters, The CIP proposes a conversion to front load equipment wherever possible because front load is more cost effective than side loading equipment. The purchase of a compactor is included in 1992 to replace the existing front line unit which is a 1965 model. Expenditures for 1993 include items anticipated to be required by Subtitle 0. Drainage Division There are two main categories of capital projects in this division. They are the drainage improvement projects which are included as part of the General 5 i n1tY.agsx i X11 Government's budget, and vehicles and heavy construction equipment, There are ten drainage improvement projects during the CIP period of 1992-96, requiring 25,635,000 in bond funds, The remaining $2,733,000 of the total $6,368,000 Drainage CIP Program will be used primarily to purchase vehicles and equipment, Fleet Services 6 Machine Shop j The Fleet Services and Machine Shop CIP is $40e,000 and, except for a $250,000 Fleet Maintenance Center scheduled for 1993, it is essentially limited to small equipment items and miscellaneous improvements to the shops, The city sold approximately $500,000 in bonds in 1990 for the Fleet Maintenance Center, Rids were received on the project in 1990 but they exceeded funds - { available. Therefore, the plans were placed on hold, and the Fleet Maintenance Center will be included as one of the necessary projects to be reviewed in the city-wide space study. j i , 3 ' k i , + i Ii i 0263f E 1 ~ 6 1 1992 - 1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES SOND~ CURRENT AID-IN TOTAL T-FUND _REVENUE CONSTR` _`-OTHER is x 1000) ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT 92 $6,415 13.15% $4,544 70.83% $1,664 25.94% $42 0.650/a $165 2,57% 93 6,258 12.82% 4,157 66.43% 1,916 30.6296 38 0, 61~/o 147 2,35% 94 7,888 16.16% 6,961 75.57% 1,636 20.7496 56 0,719'0 235 2.98% _ 95 14,397 29.50% 12,663 87.96% 1,531 10.63% 76 o,53% 127 0,88% 96 '13,841 28,36% 11,800 85.25% 1 755 12,68% 82 0.594'0 204 1,47% $48,799 $39,125 $8,502 $294 $878 WATER DEPARTMENT 92 $8,057 19.63% $6,831 84.78% $1,113 13,81% $38 0.47% $75 0.93% 93 5,628 13.71% 4,683 83.2I% 780 13.86% 50 0.89% 115 2.04% 94 5,187 12,64% 2,923 56,3594 927 17.87% 60 1.16% 1,277 24.6246 95 12,312 30.00% 7,996 64.94% 1,207 9.so% 50 0.41% 3,059 24.8646 96 9.856 24.02% 6,681 67.79% 099 11.15% 70 0.7101o 2,006 20.36% $41,040 $29,114 $5,126 $268 $6,532 i WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT 92 $5,542 27,55% $4,603 86,67% $635 t 1.46% $29 0,52% $75 }.35% 93 6,170 30.68% 5,183 84.00% 788 12.77% 8 0.13% 191 3.10% 94 2,489 12.37% 1,603 64.40% 844 33.91% 12 0.48% 30 1.21% 95 2,813 13,99% 21048 72.80% 728 25.88% 12 0.43% 25 0.890A 96 3,100 15.41% 2.179 70,29% 730 23.55% 30 U,97% 161 6.19% $20,114 $16,816 $3,726 $91 $482 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 92 $2,363 16,68% $1,445 81.154'0 $758 32.08% $0 0.00% $160 8.77% 93 2,625 18,63% 607 23,12% 1,598 60.88% 0 0.00% 420 18.00% 94 2,870 20.26% 2,038 71.01% 715 24.91% 0 o,oo% 117 4.08% 95 5,590 39,47% 1,545 27.84% 267 4,780h 0 0.004'0 3,778 67.58% 96 715 5,05 % 0 OAO% 704 98.46% 0 0,0096 11 1.5496 $14,163 $5,635 $4,042 $0 $4,486 a $124,116 v $89,690 $21,395 $653 $12,378 4/25/9111:30 - P9 7 ,W. 1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY I DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES BOND CURRENT AID-IN UTILITY DEPARTMENTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) ELECTRIC $6,415 $4,544 $1,664 $42 $165 WATER 81057 61831 11113 38 75 WASTEWATER 5,542 41803 635 29 75 COMMUNITY SERVICES 21363 11445 758 0 160 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CIP $22,377 $17,623 $4,170 $109 $475 j I' 4126191 11.35 --!9-8 I i !b 'n ry , f in ! I 1993 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY Yj DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES it BOND CURRENT AID-IN ` UTILITY DEPARTMENTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) _I ELECTRIC $6,258 $4,157 $1,916 $38 $147 f WATER 51628 4,683 780 50 115 WASTEWATER 6,170 51183 788 8 191 COMMUNITY SERVICES 2,625 607 11598 0 420 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP $20,681 $14,630 $5,082 $96 $873 I °L4/23191 11:33 t r,. ' 4+tt'f•r 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY L. DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES 60N0 CURRENT AID-IN ; _ , I C UTILITY OEPARTMENTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) j ELECTRIC $7,888 $5,961 $1,636 $56 $235 WATER 51187 21923 927 60 1,277 WASTEWATER 21489 11603 844 12 30 COMMUNITY SERVICES 2,870 21038 715 0 117 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP $184434 $12,525 $4;122 $128 $1,659 , 33 II ~ ~ l i i I ; 1 ' j i j} , I t k , I 412319111:34 P9 k _ I i V1 b . 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEIVIENT SUMMARY I j DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES _ BOND CURRENT AID-IN UTILITY DEPARTMENTS TOTAL FUND `REVENUE CONSTR OTHER I l X 1000) ELECTRIC $14,397 $12,663 $1,531 $76 $127 f WATER 12,312 7,996 1,207 50 3,059 ,F WASTEWATER 2,813 21048 728 12 25 COMMUNITY SERVICES 5,590 1,545 267 0' 31778 ~I TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP $35,112 $24,252 $3,733 $138~ $6,989 j. E I j 1. i. 1 i I_ 412319111:35 Pg il~~ 1 1M1 •t Sazztt% j 1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES BOND CURRENT AID-IN L UTILITY DEPARTMENTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE GONSTR OTHER X 1000) ELECTRIC $13,841 $11,800 $1,755 $82 $204 WATER 9,856 61681 1,099 70 2,006 WASTEWATER 31100 21179 730 30 161 COMMUNITY SERVICES 715 0 704 0 i 1 I TOTALS FOR YEAR -1996 CIP $27,512 $20,660 $4,288 $182 `$2,382 . 1 F 1 I °E I i i k P 4!23191 11,38 12 - 9 - 1 ~ }}s42bSNd i i i 1 } { ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ELECTRIC UTILITIES 15 ELECTRIC ADMINISTRATION .21 ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 26 LLi ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION........... 31 f t ELECTRIC METERING 36 ELECTRIC COMMUNICATIONS . . . 41 l i ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS . . . . 46 ELECTRIC STREET LIGHTING 51 13 ni .lflaRY 1992 - 1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN ELECTRIC UTILITIES (s x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT YEAR 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 TOTAL NUMBERS CATEGORY 1 POWER PRODUCTION ADDITIONS $160 $260 $1,200 $10,000 $8,000 $19,610 2 POWER PRODUCTION REPLACEMENT 0 0 185 0 0 185 3 OVERHEAD EXTENS/IMPROVES 360 307 455 450 630 2,202 4 UNDERGROUND EXTENSAMPROVES 529 565 712 857 922 3,585 5 DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS 328 442 668 833 1,028 3,219 a 6 METERS 80 8B 112 134 140 554 7 LOAD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 165 175 0 195 200 735 8 DISTRIBUTION SUBSTATIONS 1,077 278 355 95 860 2,665 9 STREET LIGHTING 146 179 256 357 332 1,270 10 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 390 227 280 201 270 1,368 11 TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 230 209 242 230 256 11169 IL? GAS PIPE LINE 0 1,000 0 0 0 1,000 13 RIGHT-OF-WAY/FACIL PURCHASES 555 60 65 75 80 835 14 OFFICE EQUIP, COMP, FURN, SYS MAP 159 391 233 195 206 1,184 16 BUILDINGS; CENTRAL. DISPATCH 1,400 1,240 0 0 0 2,640 16 COMMUNICATIONS AND CONTROL. 135 197 225 65 180 802 17 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENT 105 110 120 125 130 590 'I 18 ECONOMIC CONDUCTOR REPLACEMENT 205 210 215 225 230 11085 19 OVER TO UNDER CONVERSIONS 315 330 2,645 360 375 4,025 20 MISCELLANEOUS, OTHER 76 0 0 0 0 76 4/24191 14;23 TOTALS $6,415 $6,258 $7,888 $14,397 $13,641 $48,799 I 1 j yra. j Y.1:~1Fa',q 11 1?1 'J I}d[[{{ vrt:a: vas i' 1992 DEPARTMENTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ELECTRIC EXPENDITURES r' { BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DIVISIONS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER r` X 1000) 0250 ADMINISTRATION $1,565 $1,400 $158 $7 $0 0251 PRODUCTION 339 150 175 0 14 0252 DISTRIBUTION 2,777 1,822 846 0 107 E 0253 METERING 311 48 227 0 38 0254 COMMUNICATIONS 140 0 140 0 0 i 0255 SUBSTATIONS 1,137 1,077 52 0 8 0258 STREET LIGHTING 146 47 64 35 0 ! it I TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CIP $6,415 $4,544 $1,664 $42 $165 1, s 1 i { 41161919:3 16 i f 4it2V-*'JI I`F I, %a'KtYr1 (1'kjA7]]7 1993 DEPARTMENTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY I ~ ELECTRIC EXPENDITURES j BOND CURRENT AID-iN INUMBER DIVISIONS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER x 1000) 0250 ADMINISTRATION $1,430 $1,100 $330 $0 $0 0251 PRODUCTION 1,310 1,250 57 Q 3 0252 DISTRIBUTION 2,345 11336 902 0 107 0253 METERING 316 53 243 0 22 0254 COMMUNICATIONS 282 0 267 0 15 0255 SUBSTATIONS 394 348 46 0 0 0255 STREETLIGHTING 179 70 71 38 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP $6,258 $4,157 $1,916 $38 $147 4131917,29 pg 17 FT- . vz!r,--,ne ! ENTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY 1994 DEPARTM ELECTRIC EXPENDITURES k BAND CURRENT AID-IN TOTAL FUND NUMBER Dms;oNS REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) , $0 $158 $0 $8 0250 ADMINISTRATION $ 1,270 1 $166 66 1,200 58 0 12 0251 PRODUCTION 829 0 117 5,121 4,175 25 0252 DISTRIBUTION 405 117 263 0 0253 METERING 265 0 192 0 73 0254 COMMUNICATIONS 405 355 50 0 0 0255 SUBSTATIONS 256 114 86 56 0 0258 STREET LIGHTS 6 $235 I J g $5,961 $11636 TOTALS POIA YI=AR - 1994 GIP $7,88 P 3 1., l - j i I I i ;k P 1 L4091 7:30 j t 1 f ~L1995 DEPARTMENTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY i ~ ELECTRIC I EXPENDITURES BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DIVISIONS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 0250 ADMINISTRATION $198 $0 $166 $0 $32 Al 0251 PRODUCTION 10,055 10,000 55 0 0 0252 DISTRIBUTION 3,199 2,265 852 0 82 0253 METERING 368 80 275 0 13 0254 COMMUNICATIONS 95 40 55 0 0 0255 SUBSTATIONS 125 95 30 0 0 ` 0258 STREET LIGHTS 357 183 98 76 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP $14,397 $12,663 $1,531 $76 $127 F 413191 7;31 _ Pg 19 1 vvA4R "-(M1S? IS M11NfY.~ 1 C 1996 DEPARTMENTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ELECTRIC - EXPENDITURES BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DIVISIONS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHEA~ x 1000 I 0250 ADMINISTRATION $170 $0 $170 $0 $0 0251 PRODUCTION 81092 81000 64 0 28 i 0252 DISTRIBUTION 3,741 2,710 877 0 154 0253 METERING 379 84 281 0 14 I 0254 COMMUNICATIONS 210 0 210 0 0 0255 SUBSTATIONS 917 870 39 0 8 0258 STREET LIGHTS 332 136 114 82 0 i TOTALS FOR YEAR --1996 CIP $13,841 $11,800 $1,755 $82 $204 I I :w I I_ , 3 4/31917:32 P9 20 L 1992 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ELECTRIC ADMINISTRATION 0250 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER ' X 1000) 92-0250-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FU $85 $0 $85 $0 $0 92-0260-02 MOTOR POOL $35 $0 $28 $7 $0 92-0250-03 GIS $45 $0 $45 $0 $0 - 92-0250-04 NEW SERVICE FACILITY $1,400 $;,ti00 $0 $0 $0 i f TOTALS FOR YEAR -1992 CIP 1,585 1,400 158 7 0` j i 2!2119013:51 Pg 21 i E 1993 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ELECTRIC ADMINISTRATION 0250 1 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER x 1000) _ I 930260-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFU $280 $0 $280 $0 $0 93-0280-02 GIS $50 $0 $60 $0 $0 93-0250004 NEW SERVICE FACILITY $1,100 $1,100 $0 $0 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP 1,430 1,100 330 0 0 I j~ k t c_ !!i f 212219011;48 Pg 22 1994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY I r., I i ELECTRIC I ADMINISTRATION 0250 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (3 X 1000) 94-0260-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FU $90 80 $90 $0 $0 94-0250-02 MOTOR POOL $16 $0 $8 $0 $6 94-0250-03 GIS $50 30 $80 $0 $0 I i TOTALS FOR YEAR -1894 CIP 168 0 158 0 8 _.i i i 211219013,17 P9 23 i ry.., r 6tittdW~,~ fl'y' Yp. 1995 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY 1 j' ELECTRIC ADMINISTRATION 0254 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER L X 1000) 95-0260-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EOUIPMENTIFU $96 $0 $95 $0 SO 96-0250-02 MOTOR POOL $38 SO $6 $0 $32 96-0260-03 GIS $86 $0 $65 $0 $0 i i i TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP 198 0 188 0 32 1 i I . f I i { 211219013;23 Pg 24 u.Erv.,r t - ...ter»wtIl I I i 1596 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ELECTRIC ADMINISTRATION 0250 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (3 X 1000) 98-0250-01 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEN $100 SO $100 $0 $0 98-0250-02 GIS $70 $0 $70 $0 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1998 CIP 170 0 170 0 0 I i ?18!9010:33 Pg 25 i ~ v° 1 1 1992 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 0251 IPROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN ' NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (5 X 1000) 92-0251-01 POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS $80 $0 $60 $0 $0 92-0251-02 OFFICEIFACILITY EQUIPMENT, FIXTURES $17 $0 817 $0 $0 92-0261-03 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $28 $0 812 $0 $14 1 92-0261-04 POWER PLANT IMPROVEMENTSIADDITIO $160 5160 810 $0 $0 92-0261-05 SPENCER SITE FENCING/SECURITY 876 876 $0 $0 $0 c TOTALS FOR YEAR -1992 CIP 339 226 99 0 14 I ~ I I r j k t_ . ii i r k _ 212119013;69 Pg 26 I I ,Yi41~ ~ V a' G%iN"NX' r r 1993 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY I ; i ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 0251 ,Y PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (5 X 1000) 93-0251-01 POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS $31 $0 $31 $0 $0 93-0251-02 OFFICEIFACILITY EQUIPMENT, FIXTURES $18 $0 $t8 $0 $0 93-0251-03 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $11 $0 $8 $0 $3 93-0251-04 POWER PLANT IMPROVEMENTS/ADDITIO $250 $260 SO $0 $0 93-0261-05 FUEL GAS PIPELINE $1,000 51,000 $0 $0 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP 1,310 1,250 57 0 3 i ~ 2!21190 14;29 P9 27 I 1994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ELECTRIC PRODUCTION I 0251 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-1N NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 94-0251-01 POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS $33 $0 $33 $0 $0 94-0251-02 OFFICEIFACILITY EQUIPMENT, FIXTURES $19 $0 $19 $0 $0 94-0251-03 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $18 $0 $8 $0 $12 v4-0251-04 POWER PLANT IMPROVEMENTS $1,200 $1,200 $0 $0 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - IM CIP 1,270 1,200 68 0 12 i r i s ~ I t j 2121190 14:,12 Pfl 28 ii i t f _ 1gg5 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY f I' ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 0251 PROJECTd BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTIONS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 96-0261-01 POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS $35 $0 $35 $0 $0 1 95-0261-02 OFFICEIFACILITY EQUIPMENT, FIXTURES $20 $0 $20 $0 $0 I 95-0251-03 OAS TURBINE COMBINED CYCLE INSTALL 10,000 10,000 $0 $0 SO TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP 10,056 10,000 66 0 0 k I { 212119014:40 P9 29 1996 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 0251 IPROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (S X i000) 96-0251-01 POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS $36 $0 $36 $0 $0 96-0251-02 OFFICEJFACILITY EQUIPMENT, FIXTURES 20 0 20 0 0 96-0261-03 MOBILE EOUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 30 0 8 0 28 96-0261(303 OAS TURBINE COMBINED CYCLE INSTALL 6,000 8,000 0 0 0 I TOTALS FUH i t.AR - 1996 CIP $8,092 $8,96 $64 $0 528 , I I I I I ; ( 1- r I I 1 L I I I 2121!9014;62 Pg 30 p 1992 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 0252 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER) X 1000) 92-0252-01 OIH EXTENSIONS & IMPROVEMENTS $360 $360 $0 $0 $0 92-0252-02 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS $105 $105 $0 $0 $0 92-0262-03 UNDERGROUND EXTENSIONS & IMPROVE $629 $529 $0 $0 $0 92-0252-04 TRANSFORMERS & EQUIPMENT $328 $328 $0 $0 $0 92-0252-05 MOTOR POOL REPLACEMENT $268 $0 $161 $0 $107 92-0252-06 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEN $100 $0 $100 $0 $0 92-0262-07 RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS $55 $55 $0 $0 $0 j 92-0262-08 ECONOMIC FEEDER CONDUCTOR REPLA $205 $205 $0 $0 $0 92-0252-09 O1H TO UNDERGROUND CONVERSIONS $316 $316 $0 $0 $0 92-0252-10 PURCHASE OF ELECTRIC FACILITIES $500 $500 $0 $0 $0 f 92-0262-11 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFU $12 $0 $12 $0 $0 I TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CIP 2,777 2,397 273 0 107 2121190 14:66 Pg 31 5c r €7 1993 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 0252 IPROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (S X 1000) 1 93-0252-01 OIH EXTENSIONS & IMPROVEMENTS $307 $307 $0 $0 $0 93-0252-02 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS $110 $110 $0 $0 -SO 93-0252-03 UNDERGROUND EXTENSIONS & IMPROVE $685 $665 $0 $0 SO 93-0252-04 TRANSFORMERS & EQUIPMENT $442 $364 $98 $0 $0 93-0252-05 MOTOR POOL REPLACEMENT $153 $0 $46 $0 $107 93-0252-06 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEN $125 50 $126 $0 $0 93-0262-07 RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS $80 $0 $80 $0 $0 93-0252-08 ECONOMIC FEEDER CONDUCTOR REPLA $210 $210 50 $0 $0 93-0252-09 OIH TO UNDERGROUND CONVERSIONS $330 $330 $0 $0 $0 93-0252-10 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FU $43 $0 $43 $0 < $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP 2,345 1,878 362 0 107 r ) ~y 1 2!21/90 14;59 PC1 32 K. h I i Y DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY 1954 ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 0252 g0 I URRENT AID-IN PROJE- CT- S TOTAL_FUNO REVENUE CONSTR OTHER =M6 DESCRIPTION X t 000) SJ $0 $00 94-0252-01 O/H EXTENSIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS $465 $120 $0 $0 94-0252-02 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS $0 $0 94-0262-03 UNDERGROUND EXTENSIONS AND IMPR $5 8 $ 12 $0 $0 $0 $60 $O $117 94-0252-04 TRANSFORMERS AND EQUIPMENT $18 88 $00 $O > .7 i 94-0252-05 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 94-0262-06 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIP $185 $0 $0 $0 $0 94-0252-07 RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS $0 $0 $0 94-0252-08 ECONOMIC FEEDER CONDUCTOR REPLA $215 $215 $0 SO 94-0252-09 O/H TO UNDERGROUND CONVERSIO $2,845 $2,845 ` $0 $0 94-0252-10 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFU $14 $0 0 117 TOTALS MR YEAR - 1994 CIP 5,121 4,800 204 ~ Pg 33 212119016:1 1 1995 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 0252 IPROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE C014STR OTHER i X 1000) 95-0252-01 O/H EXTENSIONS & IMPROVEMENTS $480 $480 $0 $0 SO 95-0252-02 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS 5125 $125 SO $0 $0 95-0252-03 UNDERGROUND EXTENSIONS & IMPROVE $867 SO $857 SO $0 95-0252-04 TRANSFORMERS & EQUIPMENT $833 $833 $0 $0 $0 96-0252-05 MOTOR POOL REPLACEMENT $124 $0 $42 $0 $92 95-0252-06 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEN $135 $0 $135 $0 SO 95-0252-07 RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS $75 $0 $75 $0 $0 95-0252-08 ECONOMIC FEEDER CONDUCTOR REPLA $225 $225 $0 $0 $0 95-0252-09 OVERHEAD TO UNDERGROUND CONVER $360 $360 $0 $0 $0 95-0252-10 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFU $16 0 $16 $0 $0 E ~ { i TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1966 CIP 31199 11993 1,124 , 0 82 { (I 3 k i i 212119016,4 Pg 34 1 t tJ f 02, 1996 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY 1 ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 0252 i PROJECTS BOND CURRENT Ald-IN > NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (5 X 1000) i 96-0262-01 OVERHEAD EXTENSIONS AND IMPROVEM $630 $630 $0 $0 $0 96-0252-02 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS $130 $130 $0 $0 50 96-0252-03 UNDERGROUND EXTENSIONS AND IMPR $922 $922 $0 $0 SO 96-0252-04 TRANSFORMERS AND EQUIPMENT $1,028 $1,028 $0 $0 $0 96-0252-05 MOTOR POOL REPLACEMENT $190 $0 $36 $0 $154 96-0262-06 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEN $140 $0 $140 $0 $0 _ 96-0252-07 RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS $80 $0 $80 $0 $0 j SB-0252-08 ECONOMIC FEEDER CONDUCTOR REPLA $230 $0 $230 $0 $0 96-0252-09 OVERHEAD TO UNDERGROUND CONVER $375 $375 $0 $0 $0 96-0262-10 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FU $16 $0 $16 $0 $0 I , TOTALS FOR YEAR - 19% CIP 3,741 3,085 502 0 154 2121190 15:7 Pg 35 `i u VA T' 5. ~ ft r- V 1992 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ELECTRIC METERING 0253 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-iN NUMBER gESC'rliPTt~ O_ TOTAL FUND RE4ENUE CONSTR OTHER la x 10001 92-0263-01 METERS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT S80 $48 $32 $0 SO 92-0253-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $46 $0 a10 $O $ib NEOUS LS & 20 $0 166 $0 GEMENT PROGROAMPMENT as 66 $O 92-0263-03 MOAD MANA 92-0263-04 r- E 1 4 i 311 48 227 ° TOTALS FOR YEAR -1992 CIP r . ; i j ,I i t f 3 i Pg 36 y 2/21!9016;13 i 'i DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY' i 1993 ELECTRIC METERING 0253 BOND CURRENT AID-lN FR TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER IPTION ' X 1000) $53 $35 $0 $0 93-0263-01 METERS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT $88 $32 $0 X10 93-0253-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $O y0 f 93-0263-03 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EOUIPMEN 76 $0 $175 $23 $0 $0 $$22 h 93-0253-04 LOAD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 243 0 22 53 318 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 C1P { l~ 2/22190 12:13 i r F {s pIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY j99 ELECTRIC METERING 0253 I BONO CURRENT AID-1N i PflOJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUM8ER DESCRIPTION (5 X 1000) $45 $0 s0 $9 So $25 94-0253-01 METERS A ND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT $334 $0 so $0 $0 94-0253-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $60 $60 $24 ao $o 94-0263-03 REPLACE METER TESTBOARD PLACEMENT 24 $0 $185 5o $0 94-0253-04 TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT RE $185 $0 94-0263-05 LOAD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM t 263 0 25 405 117 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP i i I E 'E pg 38 ~ ?113100 16:24 1 _ fE ~gg5 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ELECTRIC METERING 0253 BOND CURRENT AID-IN PROJECTS NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER ; s (S X 1000) 96-0253-01 METERS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT $134 $80 $54 $0 t0 95-0253-02 MOTOR POOL REPLACEMENT $18 $0 $6 $0 $13 95-0253-03 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPM£N $21 $0 $21 SO $O - 95-0263-04 LOAD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM $196 $196 $0 $0 i0 TOTALS FOR YEAR -1996 CIP 388 275 80 0 13 s , 39 ` 2/1419012:38 PC r v:J f~ j ggg D1VIS10N CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ELECTRIC METERING 0253 - PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUMBER DESCRIPTION X 1000) i 96-0263-01 METERS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT $S10 5$0 $S3 $d $S4 96-0253-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 96-0253-03 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEN $22 $0 $22 $0 $0 $200 $200 $0 $0 $0 96-0263-04 TOAD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM I 28A 81 0 ' TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1996 CIP 379 y i f 1 '1 i I I t t i 'i P 40 j 2113190 16:1. w i DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY 1992 ~ rty ELECTRIC 'i COMMUNICATIONS 0254 rM! PROJECTS 80ND CURRENT AID-lN A_IIIIIIII DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER FNUMSER I$ x 10oo) 92-0264-01 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS & EQUIPMENT $20 $0 $20 $0 $0 92-0264-02 RADIO INTERCONNECT TMPA, 9RAZOS, C $30 $0 $30 ao ao 92-0264-03 AUTOMATIC VEHICLE LOCATION $30 $0 $30 $0 so 92-0264-04 REPLACE S.C.A.D.A. CRT's $20 $0 $20 $0 $0 92-0264-05 RADIO EQUIPMENT CAPACITOR CONTRO $40 $0 $40 i 140 0 140 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1892 CIP j I , e t Pg 41 1129190 18,36 t 4 i 1993 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ELECTRIC COMMUNICATIONS 0254 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN a NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONTTR OTHER x 1000) 93-0254-01 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EOUIPMEN $25 $0 $25 $0 $0 93-0264-02 RADIO EQUIPMENT CAPACITOR CONTRO $40 $0 $40 $0 $0 93-0254-03 REPLACE VEHICLE #5420 $15 $0 $U $0 $15 93-0254-04 UTILITY DISPATCH RADIO AND TELEPHON $7 so $7 $0 $0 93-0264-05 COMPUTER AIDED DISPATCH $70 $0 $70 $0 $0 93-0254-06 UPGRADE S,C,A.D,A. $125 $0 $125 $0 $0 0 15 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP 282 O 267 i i i I f 212019011:45 Po 42 i ION CP TI AL IMPROVFMENT SUMMARY 1994 i ELECTRIC ~i COMMUIJICATIONS .^z 0254 gOND CURRENT IA D-1N PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUMBER OESCRIPTION X 1000) $0 $40 $ $0 $0 0 So 94-0254-01 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEN $40 $0 $2 $0 $13 °i gRADIO q-0254-Q3 REPLACE VCHIGLE ~04CITOFI CON $15 $0 SO $0 $60 TR0 S40 $0 1 94-0254 $60 $126 $O 94-0254-04 REPLACE VINTAGE RADIO REPEATERS $125 $0 94-0254E08 UPGRADE S.C.A.O.A. 73 265. 0 192 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP ! i q pg 49 2120100 11:55 ~a.. P ' SSS DIVISION CAPITAL IRAPROVEMENT SUMMARY 1995 ELECTRIC COMMUNICATIONS 0254 1 80110 CURRENT AID-IN FROJECIS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER ;i INUMBER DESCRIPTION (s x 1000) 530 $0 $0 I 95-0254-01 MI SCE E QNPM NTOO PAG TOR CONTRO $40 $EO 825 SO $0 ;0 0 95-0254-02 RA 525 95-0264-03 SECURITY FOR CITY FACILITIES ! 6b 0 0 95 40 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1896 CIP 1 1I f i 7 ! , i I I i i 'i p 44 I 2113190 16;40 j i ps:,1A 1996 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY J ELECTRIC COMMUNICATIONS 0254 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONTTR OTHER 1. (5 X 1000) 96-0254-01 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EOUIPMEN $30 50 $30 $0 $0 96-0254-02 RADIO EQUIPMENT CAPACITOR CONTRO $30 $0 $30 $0 $0 96-0264-03 UPGRADE SCADA COMMUNES TO FIBER $160 i0 $160 $0 $0 i TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1996 CIP 210 0 210 0 0 1 ..1 .l f } 1 I j _J 2114190 9,29 P 45 'i 1 1 1 ay,', 1992 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ELECTRIC } SUBSTATIONS 0255 PROJECTS BOND CURRSNT AID-1N^ NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER 1 (3 X 1000) 92-0255-01 REPLACE 69 KV BREAKERS $82 $82 $0 $0 $0 92-0255-02 REPLACE SUBSTATION INTERPHONE SYS $15 $0 $15 $0 30 92-0255-03 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 0651 $15 $0 $7 $0 38 92-0265-04 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS 8 EQUIPMENT $30 $0 $30 $0 $0 92-0255-05 MOBILE TRANSFORMER EQUIPMENT $35 $35 $0 $0 $0 92-0255C05 ARCO SUBSTATION $960 $960 $0 $0 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 GIP 1,137 1,077 52 0 8 I I , i I I { f i , { 212110015:21 P 46 } iap::)3aKy7 I f { 1993 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS 1 0255 ! «.ti PROJECTS - BOND CURRENT AID-IN "i NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONST'R OTHER X 1000) 1 93-0255-01 HICKORY SUBSTATION ACS RETROFIT $188 $188 $0 80 $0 93-0265-02 REPLACE 69 KV BREAKERS $90 $90 $0 $0 $0 : 93-0256-03 SUBSTATION WEILAND PURCHASE $70 $70 $0 $0 $0 93-0256-04 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEN $30 80 $30 $0 $0 93-0266-05 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 0651 $18 $0 $16 $0 $0 i I TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP 394 346 46 0 0 212019013,45 Pg 47 l t ggq pIViSION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY j ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS 0255 I 90ND CURRENT AID-}N PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE C0NSTR OTHER NUMBER DESCRIPTION (s X i Oa01 $0 $0 94-0265-01 RETROFIT BREAKERS (LOCUST AND NOR $ S86 $s44 $0 $O $0 94-0256-02 REPLACE 69 KV BREAKERS 94-0255-03 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPM£N $30 $6 $30 s0 $0 94-0265-04 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 0550 $20 $0 $ea $o $0 1 405 355 50 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP I 3 , i 1 P 48 2(2019013;48 s f .fir. 1995 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS 0255 P' PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 95-0265-01 SUBSTATION SCREENING (LOCUST) $85 $85 $0 50 SO 95-'0265-02 BATTERY REPLACEMENT - NORTHLAKES $10 $10 $0 $0 $0 96-0255-03 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEN $30 $0 $30 $0 $0: 95-0255-04 DUPLEX AIRPORT SUBSTATION $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _m TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP 125 95 30 0,00 j i ;I I , 4 Pq 49 2/2019014:20 1996 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY i I ELECTRIC I SUBSTATIONS 0255 j PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (.S X 1000) 96-0255-01 BATTERY REPLACEMENT - LOCUST SUBS $10 $10 $0 $0 $0 96-0265-02 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEN $30 50 $30 $0 $0 96-0255-03 REPAIR LOCUST STREET SUBSTATION BU $10 $10 $0 $0 $0 96-0255-04 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT #560 $17 $0 $9 $0 $8 96-0255G04 DUPLEX AIRPORT SUBSTATION $850 $860 $0 $0 $0 i `I TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1996 CIP 917 870 39 0 8 i j I I I r 2/20190 14:29 Pg 50 } tau , 1992 DIVISION (:APITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ELECTRIC STREET LIGHTING 0258 f _ PROJECTS BOND CURRENT A!D-IN NUM8ER DEEICRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTP. OTHER x 1000) 92-0258-01 RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING $59 $0 $24 $35 $0 92-0258-02 STREET LIGHTS - ARTERIAL $47 $47 $0 $0 $0 92-0258-03 STREET LIGHTING - SECURITY $40 $0 $40 $0 $0 i TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CIP 148 47 64 35 0 ;.1 1 i I i - L4115191 9;1 p$ 51 s r i dtif.tts:~j i HttrE1.+.~ ~~~jj 993 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY 1 ELECTRIC STREETLIGHTING 0258 IPROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-1N NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER I X 1000) i 93-0258-01 RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING $64 $0 $26 $38 $0 93-0258-02 STREET LIGHTS - ARTERIAL $70 $70 $0 $0 $0 93-0258-03 STREET LIGHTS - SECURITY $45 $0 $45 $0 $0 j ' TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CtP ~ 79 70 71 38 0 I i t ; f i 21819016;42 Pg 52 i f•3~ r- E r , 1994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY i ELECTRIC } STREET LIGHTS 0258 BONq CURRENT AID-IN ~l PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUMBER DESCRIPTION (5 X 1000) ' 38 $58 ~ it 94-0258-01 RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING $9 $11 $O 4 $36 $0 $0 j 94-0258-02 STREET LIGHTS - ARTERIAL $12 2 $50 so $50 $0 $0 94-0258-03 STREET LIGHTS - SECURITY 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1984 CIP 256 114 88 68 1 I 1 1 i 2lSf90 15149 Pg 53 1 I q plVl APITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY 1995 i - ELECTRIC STREET LIGHTS 0258 BOND CURRENT AID-IN PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUMBER DESCRIPTION (5 X 1000) $121 $0 $45 $76 $0 95-0258-01 RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING $183 $183 $0 $0 $0 r 96-0258-02 STREET LIGHTS - ARTERIAL $63 $0 $53 50 $0 96-0268-03 STREET LIGHTS - SECURITY i j II i I 3 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP 357 183 98 78 0 I I 1 i ~I j I . 3 PL 2!8!90 16;66 i M M v e + „ 1 L1996 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ELECTRIC STREET LIGHTS 1 4258 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER J DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 96-0258-01 RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTINC $136 $54 $0 $82 $0 96-0258-02 STREET LIGHTS - ARTERIAL $136 $136 $0 $0 $0 96-0268-03 STREET LIGHTS - SECURITY $60 $0 $60 $0 $0 it ` TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1996 CIP 332 190 60 82 0 I J I ,i i _i 2/819016:4 Pg 55 r I 1 i I i i ! 1•. 1 I ~ ) t I f i l j lM E i j c 56 1 . ! e i t 6ttVpih9~ G I I WATER DEPARTMENT FABLE OF CONTENTS 59 WATER UTILITIES . WATER ADmiNISTRATION...................... F WATER PRODUCTION........ • • . . WATER DISTRIBUTION.. , , 80 WATER METERING. ' ' WATER ENGINEERING..... $5 90 WATER LABORATORY . . . . . . . . . . . i J I ~..y i 57 I f j it • i~ I I i I p I f 58 1992 - 1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN WATER UTILITIES x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT YEAR 1992 1993 1994 NUMBERS CATEGORY 1995 1996 TOTAL 1 NEW WATER PLANT frRANS LINE $316 $105 $2,309 $8,343 $6,030 Ln 2 BOOSTER STATION 3,923 i,808 17102 31 3 ELEVATED STORAGE 1,301 0 0 0 5731 4 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE ,301 1,099 0 0 0 2400 5 REPLACEMENT WATER LINES 671 11298 11085 1,104 733 4891 527 252 490 635 382 6 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM INFILL 150 150 250 2286 7 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER LINES 250 50 250 250 150 750 8 OVERSIZE WATER LINES 250 250 250 1250 10 150 160 150 147 9 TAPS, FIRE HYDS, AND FIELD EQUIP 1 8 209 226 272 342 11 10 LABORATORY IMPROVEMENTS 1 4 6 11 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 1 4 0 0 i 12 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 1 16 12 213 0 4 87 721 30 60 4 t20 5 1 13 OFFICE FURNITURE/EQUIPMENT t5 14 MISCELLANEOUS 12 8 9 11 30 70 446 70 458 1,306 11598 3878 4/24/M t 15;14 $8,057 $5,628 $5,187 $12,312 $9,866 $41,040 i. 1 j tSiNifSN 1 1 I 992 DEPARTMENTAL CAPIT ILA MF'ROVEMENT SUIVIMARY U WATER EXPENDITURES - 90, CURRENT AID-IN DIVISIONS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUM9ER X 1000) 0450 ADMINISTRATION $5 $0 $5 $0 $0 0460 PRODUCTION 51868 50639 19 0 10 0461 DISTRIBUTION 2,003 971 940 38 54 04162 METER 148 0 137 0 11 0463 ENGINEERING 3 0 3 0 0 0480 LABORATORY 30 21 9 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR -1992 CIP $8,057 $6,831 $1,113 $38 $75 f f i I I II I j Pg 60 i 4122/91 8:51 I Ffik,'+M' 1993 DEPARTMENTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY a 7 l~ WATER EXPENDITURES BOND CURRENT AID-IN INUMBER DIVISIONS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 0450 ADMINISTRATION $13 $0 $13 $0. $0 0460 PRODUCTION 3,152 3,077 26 0 47 0461 DISTRIBUTION 23298 1,598 582 50 68 0462 METER 131 0 131 0 0 0463 ENGINEERING 2 0 2 0 0 0480 LABORATORY 32 8 24 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP $5,628 $4,683 $780 $50 $115 I j 4117/91 17,6 Pg ` 61 ~Ae e IEY. x9 J,I ' i I dE:rl2fiS 1994 DEPARTMENTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY t WATER EXPENDITURES BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DIVISIONS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CON STR OTHER _ i I x 1000) j r ' 0450 ADMINISTRATION $5 $0 $5 $0 $0 0460 PRODUCTION 21775 11518 4 0 1,253 0461 DISTRIBUTION 2,240 11365 771 60 24 0462 METER 138 0 138 0 0 0463 ENGINEERING 2 0 2 0 0 0480 LABORATORY 27 20 7 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP $5,187 $2,923 $927 $60 $1;27 / II { E s I i _I 41221918:65 P6 62 1 4 ,99~vdv 1 1995 _ DEPARTMENTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY I WATER 7 EXPENDITURES e BOND CURRENT AID TOTAL FUND REVENUE ONST OTHER DIVISIONS NUMBER . X 1000) 0450 ADMINISTRATION $6 $0 $6 $0 $0 9,669 6,574 70 0 3,025 0460 PRODUCTION 21446 11404 974 50 18 0461 DISTRIBUTION 164 0 148 0 16 0462 METER 0463 ENGINEERING 2 p 2 p p 0480 LABORATORY 25 18 7 0 0 s I TOTALS FOR YE,kH - issfi cip $12,312 $7,996 $1,207 $50 $3,059 ,I _I _I 1 4117191 17:19 _ p11 53 - - _i ~ggg DEPAR?MENTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WATER EXPENDITURES BOND CURRENT AID IN TOTAL _FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUMBE~T__ DIVISIONS - X 100Q~ , . , 0450 ADMINISTRATION $6 $0 $6 $0 $0 , 0460 PRODUCTION 7,791 5,634 172 0 1,985 1,836 1,033 733 70 0 I 0461 DISTRIBUTION 21 V 0462 METER 185 0 164 0 2 0 2 0 0 0463 ENGINEERING 36 14 22 0 0480 LABORATORY V I TOTALS FOR YEAR _ 1996 CIP $9,856 $6,681 $1,099 $70 $2,006 } i f 1 i , l f I 4117/91 1728 Hc,} ,64 l I fvf!laN;r t !D i i 1992 - DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY Jy`j WATER ADMINISTRATION 0450 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 92-0450-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFU $5 $0 $5 $0 $0 I ..7 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CIP 5 0 6-- 0 0 i lyala i 212119016:87 Pg 65 I PtHSRFrs7 i ala Pa~ l 1 r A-' - _ ' 1993 DIVISION CA.,?~TAI_ I_M VEMENT SUMMARY r^y_- WATER ADMINISTRATION 0450 BOND CUR^ RENT-AID-I- ~-:HE:F]l PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER i ; FNUMaER DESCRIPTION ~ X 1000) s $5 $0 $0 { 93-0450-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIP MENTIFU $$5 5 $0 $0 $8 $0 $0 I 93-0450-02 NEW COMPUTER - 13 0 13 --0- - I, TOTALS FOR YEAR -1993 CIP ~ l I I l III Il l . I li f i _ 66 1 crs1knsL5 y 1994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WATER ADMINISTRATION 0450 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-1N Y' NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER i X 1000) 94-0450-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FU $6 $0 $5 $0 $0 7 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP 5 ^ 0 5 0 0 7 i y I V 212119015168 Pg 67 iVAe V ,1 1 Vt d'(A'AS IlHfridV$' j g5 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY_ WATER ADMINISTRATION 0450 ` PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER! DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER ! X 1000) 96-0450-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFU $6 $0 $6 $0 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP 6 0 - 6 0 0 + i i, I i f ~s 2121/90 15:59 Pg 68 i f p'ASFtiV>. I.rOYFVH 1996 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY 1 ? WATER ADMINISTRATION 0450 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION _A TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER x 1000) 96-0450-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFU $6 $0 $6 $0 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1996 CIP 6 0 6 0 0J 'r f .a - +1 ..J I 212119016:0 ..._._..?9 69 _ _1 1 1992 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY E WATER PRODUCTION 0460 IPROJECTS i~ BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER x 1000) i 92-0460-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $15 $0 $6 $0 $10 92-0460-02 OFFICE FURNITURE 2 0 2 0 0 92-0460-03 OFFICE MACHINES 10 0 10 0 0 92-0460-04 TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 2 0 2 0 0 92-0460-05 DISINFECTION SYSTEM MUDIRCATION 400 400 0 0 0 92-0460-06 PIGGING RAW WATER LINES 300 300 0 0 0 92-046OA01 RAY ROBERTS WTP AND RAW WATER FA 0 0 0 0 0 92-046OA03 BOOSTER STATION AND SYSTEM TIE-IN 3,623 3,523 0 0 0 92-0460002 FINISH WATER TRANSMISSION LINE 315 315 0 0 0 92-0460004 2 MG ELEVATED STORAGE TANK 1,301 1,301 0 0 0 I i TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CIP $5 868 $5,839 $19 $0 $10 t i i i f t i ~ i I I 70 4116191 8;18 Po P;, , 1. ouN,tc c Z tlF~+titWF('7~ 5 III77} 1993 w DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEb1ENT S-UMMARY 1 + WATER PRODUCTION 0460 ! T~ 80ND CURRENT AID-1N PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUMBER DESCRIPTION _ X 1000) ._i $71 $0 $24 $0 $47 1 93-0460-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 2 0 2 0 0 93-0460_02 FURNITURE p 0 0 OFFICE - 65 , ~ i 93-0460•-03 NEW BOOSTER PUMP FOR THE UPPER P 82 O 2 0 i 93-0460-04 TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 93-046OA01 RAY ROBERTS WTP AND RAW WATER FA 1,808 0 0 93-0460A03 BOOSTER STATION AND SYSTEM TIE-IN 1'80 105 0 0 0 93-0460C02 FINISH WATER TRANSMISSION LINE 1,0106 99 1.099 0 0 93-0460DO4 2 MG ELEVATED STORAGE TANK $3,152 $3.077 $28 $0 $47 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP I I it - 71 Pg 4116/918',21 ~-te •..SRAiYiS 1 11r p 1 1994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY f WATER PRODUCTION 0460 s BOND CURRENT AiD~IN IPRO3ECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUk1RER DESCRIPTION (5 x 1000) I 9,1-0460-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $12 $0 $0 $0 $120 2 0 2 0 94-0460-02 OFFICE FURNITURE 2 0 2 0 0 j 94-0460-03 TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 0 1,131 94-046OA01 RAY ROBERTS WTP AND RAW WATER FA 2,3090 1,1780 0 0 94-0460002 FINISH WATER TRANSMISSION LINE 460 340 0 0 110 94-046OF03 OZONATION DISINFECTION SYSTEM r v - I $2,775 $1,518 $4 $0 $1,263 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 GIP 1 i 772 F 4118191 8;35 _ I. eir'-Hx?4~ v DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY I WATER PRODUCTION 0460 - BOND CURRENT AID-IN PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUMBER D_ ESCRIPTION X i 000} 95-0480-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $22 $0 $22 $0 $0 0 2 0 0 95-0460-02 OFFICE FURNITURE 2 2 0 J 95-0460-03 TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 2 0 44 0 0 95-0460-04 REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING AGING CHE 44 0 0 2,717 95-048OA01 RAY ROBERTS WTP AND RAW WATER FA 5,544 2,827 0 0 0 1 95-0480002 FINISH WATER TRANSMISSION LINE 2,799 2,799 1 ?56 948 0 0 .308 95-046OF03 0LONATION DISINFECTION SYSTEM $9,669 $6.674 $70 $0 $3,025 f TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP I~l "I I I ..i 4118191 Pg 7 9:25 1 4 NfSFf.,:1 C::Yhti!4i~ 1 0996 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WATER PRODUCTION 0460 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (S X 1000) 96-0460-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 888 $0 675 $0 613 96-0460-02 OFFICE FURNITURE 20 0 20 0 0 96.0460-03 OFFICE MACHINES 20 0 20 0 0 96-0460-04 CONFINED SPACE SAFETY EQUIP. 10 0 10 0 0 96-0460-05 TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 26 0 26 0 0 96-0460-06 RADIOS FOR NEW RAY ROBERTS WTP 12 0 12 0 0 96-0460-07 MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SHED 10 0 10 0 0 96-046OA01 RAY ROBERTS WTP AND RAW WATER FA 3,234 1,649 0 0 1,585 96-0460002 FINISH WATER TRANSMISSION LINE 2,796 2,796 0 0 0 l 96-046OF03 OZONATION DISINFECTION SYSTEM 1,676 1,189 0 0 387 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1996 CIP 67,791 $5,634 6172 $0 61,986 I_ f' I ~ 41161919:24 PU 74 i "t:rrxwq I 1 (1992 -DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY € WATER DISTRIBUTION 0461 IPROJECTS BOND CURRENT AIQ-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 92-0461-01 OVERSIZE WATER LINES $150 $150 $0 $0 -$0 92-0461-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $139 $0 $85 $0 $54, 92-0461-03 WATER TAPS, LOOPS $38 $0 $0 $38 $0 92-0461-04 REPLACE FIRE HYDRANTS & VALVES $58 $0 $58 $0 $0 92-0461-06 REPLACE WATER LINE STREET P.90GRA $216 $0 $216 $0 $0 92-0461-06 REPLACE MISC. WATER LINES $311 $0 $311 $0 $0 92-0461-07 MISC. EQUIPMENT $15 $0 $15 $0 $0. 92-0461-08 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER LINES $250 $0 $250 $0 $0 92-0461-09 DIST. SYS, UPGRADE WTR LINES (1992) $90 $90 $0 $0 $0 92-0461-10 WATER DISTA18UT1014 SYSTEM INFILL $150 $150 $0 $0 $0 92-0461-11 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFU $5 $0 $5 $0 $0 92-04 61 008 DIST. SYS. UPGRADE WTR LINES (1991) $581 $581 $0 $0 $0 .i I j TOTALS FOR YEAR -1992 CIP 2,003 971 940 38 54 j 4117191 16:1 PO 75 ` nla.l a!1!t)yIF:W 1 ii. l Pa.n.L'.lh`.Y~ l.yS42 O CA iP TAL kMPROUEMENT SUMMARY _ l_1993 WATER DISTRIBUTION 0461 BONE) CURARE TN AID-V~ k PROJECT-S -J~ TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUMBER DESCRIPTION X 1000) $0 $0 $0 L $150 $150 II 93-0461-01 OVERSIZE WATER LINES $118 $0 $$0 $50 ~$0 1 93-0461-02 MOFjiLE EQUIPMENT $50 $0 $0 $0 I 93-0461-03 WATER TAPS, LOOPS $15 $0 $15 $92 $0 $0 93-0481-04 REPLACE FIRE HYDRANTS EVALVES $0 $0 $160 160 $0 $0 93-0461-05 REPLACE MISG WAVER LINES PROGRA $92 $0 $0 $$15 $0 93-0461-06 $15 93-0461-07 MISC. EQUIPMENT $260 $0 $250 $0 $0 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER LINES $96 $96 $0 $0 $0 }I 93-0461-08 $0 1 93-0461_pg DIST, SYS UPGRADE WTR LINES (1993) $0 $0 $0 $0 $383 $150 $0 i ' I 93-0461 -10 DIST~SY5SUPGRADE WTR LINES (1992) $81$1509 $ $813839 $0 §0 93-0461[)09 I 93-0461C08 DIST, SYS. UPGRADE WTR LINES (1991) k ~ 582 5` 0 6 2,298 1;6g 9 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP 'k r ~ I ~ L 1{ I 1 i pg 76 4117191 i *Ij t AS:~;v~;gp 1 ,y 1994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WATER I DISTRIBUTION 0461 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 94-0461-01 OVERSIZE WATER LINES $150 $150 $0 $0 $0 94-0461-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $25 $0 $1 $0 $24 94-0461-03 WATER TAPS, LOOPS $60 $0 $0 $60 $0 94-0461-04 REPLACE FIRE HYDRANTS & VALVES $15 $0 $15 $0 $0 94-0461-05 REPLACE WATER LINE STREET PROGRA $150 $0 $150 $0 $0 94-0461-06 REPLACE MISC. WATER LINES $340 $0 $340 $0 $0 94-0461-07 MISC. EQUIPMENT $15 $0 $15 $0 $0 94-0461-08 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER LINES $250 $0 $260 $0 $0 94-0461-09 DIST, SYS, UPGRADE WTR LINES (1994) $69 $69 $0 $0 $0 94-0461-10 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM INFILL $150 $150 $0 $0 $0 94-0461E09 DIST. SYS. UPGRADE WTR LINES (1993) $640 $540 $0 $0 $0 94-0461009 DIST. SYS, UPGRADE WTR LINES (1992) $476 $476 $0 e0 $0 I I I TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP 2,240 1,365 771 64 24 I ' L { 4/221918:48 pg 77 yy 11 1 l4nYP.` 11 1 DlViSION CAPITAL 1MP~ ROVEMENT SUMMARY 1995 _r____~. - WATER DISTRIBUTION I 0461 I BAND CURR£N iAT n-IN PR(3JECTTS TOTAL FUND REVEL ~ONSTR OTHER =NUMBER DESCRIPTION j x 1000) $150 $150 $p $0 $$8 I 95-0461-01 OVERSIZE WATER LINES $ $28 $0 95-0461-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $50 $0 $0 $60 $0 95-0461-03 WATER TAPS, LOOPS $64 $0 $0 REPLACE FIRE HYDRANTS & VALVES $64 $0 95-0461 $p $0 -04 138 $0 $138 0 ~ I 950461-05 REPLACE WATER ATE STREET PGRA $$497 $0 $497 $0 $o 95-0461-~06 REPLACE MISC. WATER LINES $15 $0 $15 $0 $0 95-0461-07 MISC. EQUIPMENT $250 $0 $250 $0 $0 i 95-0461-09 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER LINES $24 $24 $0 $0 $0 95-0461-09 DIST, SYS, UPGRADE WTR LINES (1995) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 j 95-0461-10 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 1NFILL $160 $150 $0 $0 $0 $0 I i 95-0461F09 DIST. SYS. UPGRADE WTR LINES (1994) $691 $691 $ $66991 1 95-0461 E09 DIST. SYS. UPGRADE WTR LINES (1993) I I i I - 974 60 18 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP 9.446 1,404 i j ~I 1 j r f 1 ! PU 78 4117191 16126 - r. 1 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPFIOVEM T SUMMARY _-----J 1996 WATER 1 `M DISTRIBUTION 0461 BOND CURRENT 1 PgOJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUMI BEq DESCRIPTION x !0001 $0 $0 $0 $150 $)$00 $16 $0 $0 OVERSIZE 1NA1'ER LINES $16 $0 $70 $0 96-0461-01 $70 $0 $0 $0 96-0461-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $0 $70 $0 $0 I WATER TAPS, LOOPS $70 $50 $0 96-0,161-03 $0 $60 $0 96-0461-04 REPLACE FIRE HYDRANTS 8 VALVES $0 $332 6 REPLACE WATER LINE STREET PROGRA $332 $15 $0 $0 98-0461-•0' $0 96-0461-06 REPLAC> MISC. WATER LINES $15 $0 $260 's0 $0 i 96-0461-07 MISC, EQUIPMENT $250 $0 $0 $0 98-0461-08 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER LINES $90 $90 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 i F1 96-0461-09 GIST. SYS. UPGRADE WTq LINES (1998) $!50 $150 $0 F $146 $146 $0 $p 1 96-0481-10 WATER DISTRIBUTION LINES SYSTEM INFILL $497 $497 $0 I 96-0461G09 D1ST SYS, UPGRADE WTR LINES (1994) - 96-0461F09 70 ! 836 1,033 733 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1996 CIP pa 71) 4117!91 16',17 - - i R:ylti!~f'1 r SUM-MARY - IVISION- CAA AL IMPROVEME-- 1996 WATER DISTRIBUTION 4461 1 gpND CURRENT AID-IN TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONS7fl OTHER j PROJECTS - - NUMBER DESCRIPTION- )(1000) $0 $0 $150 $159 $0 $0 $18 $0 $70 $0 96-0461-01 OVERBITE WATER LINES $16 $79 $0 $0 $0 $0 I 96-0461-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $70 $0 0461-93 WATER TAPS, LOOPS $70 $0 $0 $0 96- 98-04fi!-04 REPLACE FIRE HYDRANTS & VALVES flOGRA $50 $50 $0 $332 $0 $0 -0461-05 REPLACE WATER LINE STREET P $332 $0 33 $0 $0 9696-0461-06 REPLACE MISC. WATER LINES $15 $0 $250 50 $0 MISC. EQUIPMENT $250 $0 $0 $0 NES , 96-0461-07 $0 $0 $0 96-0461-08 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER LI $90 $90 96-0461-09 DIST. SYS. UPQRADE WTfl LINES 119961 $150 $150 $U $p $p 96-X81-10 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM INFILL $14 $14 $0 $0 $0 LINES 0~5) 96-046IG09 DIST' SYS. UPGRAOWTR LINES (19941 $496 $497 $0 96-0461F09 DIST, SYS. UPGRADE 733 70 0 1,836 1,033 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1996 CIP _ I po 79 407191 16:17 - lltyf :.•i:F b4 DIVISION CAPI FiOVEMENT SUMMARY 1992 j WATER METER 0462 ,I BOND CUfifim i AID-IN PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR ]=OIHHCR INUMBER DESCRIPTION X 1000) $17 $0 $6 $92-0462-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $120 $p $120 $0 $0 92-0462-02 WATER METERS $11 $p $11 $0 I 92-0462-03 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT p 137 ' 148 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 GIP If E 1 I { E I I I Pg 80 4122/91.8:31 r 111 1 a t 1993 DIVISION CAP_ YAL ,MPR_ O~MENT SUMMARY y WATER METER r 0462 BOND CURRENT A10-IN PROD- ECTS TOTAL FUND REVEN__ UE__CONSTR OTHER NUMBER DESCRIPTION X 1000) i $126 $0 $126 $0 $0 93-0462-01 WATER METERS $5 $0 $5 $0 $0 93-0462-02 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT i t Y _ 13~ 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP 131 0 i a J pgl81~ 2112/90 9:45 _ 1 i 4llt"4M T~ 511 x994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY I WATER METER 0462 IPROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) _ 94-0462-01 WATER METERS $133 $0 $133 $0 $0 94-0462-02 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT $5 $0 $5 $0 $0 r TOTALS FOR YEAR -1894 CIP 138 0 138 0 0 i i ~ i i < j lkl~ i i j i i i I 2112!90 9,62. Pg 82 s s i 1 ti3es.YC, 1995 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY _ WATER a METER ,w 0402 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 96-0462-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $19 $0 $3 $0 $16 95-0462-02 WATER METERS $140 $0 $140 $0 $0 I 96-0462-03 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT $6 $0 $5 $0 $0 _J TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP 164 TT 148 0 16 i I i _a .i .r, i 2126/9016:30 Pg 83 1996 ~~~--DIVISION CAPITAL IMPRdVEMENMMARY~ WATER METER 0462 BONG CURREN--T- T AiD'4N PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUMBER DESCRIPTION X 1000) , $40 $0 $19 $0 96-0462-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $0 96-0462-02 WATER METERS $140 $0 $140 $5 $0 $5 $0 $0 96-0462-03 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT i i 186 0 164 0 21 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1998 CIP t I ( i } i } j I 1 p 84 2112)9010:37 j h tom, t1 i 7 j -1992 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WATER ' ENGINEERING 0463 _ NOB CURRENT AID-IN l dECTS~ TOTAL FUND REVENUE CO_NSTR OTHER PRO NUMBER _ DESCRIPTION _ _ - X 1000 $0 $2 $0 $2 $0 92-0463-01 FIELD EQUIPMENT $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 92-0463-02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE I - 1 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CIP f i 1fi 1 i i 1 PO 65 - 214190 13i6 Yy, 4t Y p SIGN CAPITA. IMPROVEMENT S_ ~MMARY = ',4 WATER ENGINEERING 0463 _ gOND CURRENT AID-IN - PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUMBER DESCRIPTION - F X 1000) $0 $1 $0 $0 $1 $1 $0 $0 93-0463-01 FIELD EQUIPMENT $1 $0 93-0463-02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE ~2- 0 2 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP i ~ i ~ t i I V IG ' it 1 i 86 - ---DIVISION CAPITAL IMPRO NT SUMMARY El 99 _ _ - _ WATER ENGINEERING I 0463 BQND CURRENT A1D-1N R _ PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONS?-~R OTHE NUMBER DESCRIPTION _ X 1000) $1 $0 $I $0 $0 94-0463-01 FIELO EQUIPMENT $1 $0 $0 94-0463-02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE $1 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP f t { 7 _s Pg 87 1123190 14,16 _ _ 1 1995 DIVISION CAPITAL. IMPROV'EMEN'T SUMMARY ;I WATER ENGINEERING 0463 PROJECTS - BOND CURRENT AID-IN~ NUMBER ^DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 95-•0463-01 FIELD EQUIPMENT $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 95-0463-02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 j I TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP 2 0 0 0 11 ~ f i i { I I `4 I I I r I i i I 112419014:26 i k ~lN. hstr:+ yi• ~4.I!iSrss} 199~DIVISION CAPITA. IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WATER ENGINEERING 0463 i BOND CURRENT AID-IN PROJECTS DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUMBER x 1000) 96-0463-01 FIELD EQUIPMENT $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 98-0463-02 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMEN71FU $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 -may TOTALS FOP. YEAR 1996 CIP 0 0 1 j I .E i I It 214!9016:7 Pg 89 - - u V i DI`iISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMA t 992 _ ~ - j WATER LABORATORY 0480 BOND CURRENT AID-IN - PROJCT5 TOTAL FUND REVENUE GQNSTR OTHER INUMBER DESCRIPTION--- - (S X 1000) ! $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 92-0480-01 LABORATORY CASEWORK MAINT $2 $0 $2 $p $0 92-0480-0?, DIV INFORMATION MOMt SYSTEM $21 $21 $0 $0 $0 92-0480-03 GAS CHROMIMASS SPEC (OCIMS) $1 $0 $0 92-0480-04 LABORATORY SINK FUME HOOD $I $0 $2 $0 $2 $0 $0 92-0480-06 EC DETECTOR (GCS $2 $0 $2 $p $O 92-0480-08 MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SYS $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 92-04BO-07 CONFINED SPACE ENTRY 30 21 g o 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CIP 1 ,t 4 1 i I i X 217191 0'28 90 1 f e n i~ y I w DN1510N CAPITAL IT _ MF OVEMEN_~ "f SUMMAR`~ _y 4 1993 WATER LABORATORY 0480 60ND CURRENT AID-IN PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER D£SCRIPI'ION NUMBER X 1000) $3 $0 $3 $0 $0 030480-01 t AB09ATORY CASEWORK MAINT $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 $8 $0 $0 93-0480-02 DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM $0 $8 $2 $0 $0 I 93-'0480-03 REPLACEMENT LAITOR NG S EQUIP $2 $0 $0 $0 83.0480-04 WATERSHED 4AONITORIN4 STATION $2 $0 $2 $0 $0 $g $0 TION $2 $0 $0 930480-06 HVAC RENOVA $6 93-0480-06 SOD INCUBATOR $2 $Q $0 $0 -0"7 RESERVOIR MONITORING EQUIP $0 $4 93-0480 MENT $4 $5 $0 $0 $0 93-0480-08 MOSILE EQUIPMENT (NEW) $6 93-0480-09 BACT LAS CASEWORK RENOVATION l 24 0 0 32 8 TOTALS FOR YEAR ° 1993 Clp 4 f r , I 91 w . - 1 } a 1994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WATER LABORATORY 0480 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER 'DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR GTHERJ X 1000) : 94-0480-01 INDUC COUPLED PLASMA SPEC $20 $20 $0 $0 $0 94-0480-02 DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 94-0480-03 LABORATORY EQUIPMENT $3 $0 $3 $0 $0 94-OABO-04 WATERSHED MONITORING PROGRAM $3 $0 $3 $0 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP 27 20 7 0 0 r k t f i f ! I i i 4118191 16:8 PO 92 j Iffr- R. a .r_.. 1 1 f ION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY 1995 DIVIS WATER LABORATORY 0480 BOND CURRENT AID-IN PROJECTS [NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER x 1000 I 18 18 $0 $0 $0 95-0480-01 LIQUID CHROMIINFRARED SPEC $$2 $$0 $2 $0 $0 96-0480-02 DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM $0 $ 1 $$0 $0 98-0480-03 OZONE MONITORING EQUIPMENT $1 $0 0 $0 95-0480,^ 1 MOBILE EQUIPMENT X25 18 7 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR 1985 C!P f i i p I r~ 93 4!18!9116;14 i 1996 , DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WATER LABORATORY 0480 IPROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CON5TR OTHSR X 1000) r i 96-0480-01 LAB RENOVATION $6 $6 $0 $0 $0 96-0480-02 DIV INFORMATION MOMT SYSTEM $4 $0 $4 $0 $0 96-0480.03 LABORATORY EQUIPMENT $12 $0 $12 $0 $0 M 96-0480-04 WATERSHED MONITORING $6 $0 $6 $0 $0 j 96-0480-05 GAS CHROMATOGRAPH (00) $8 $8 $0 $0 $0 3 ! i TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1996 CIP 36 14 22 0 0 i i i i r f w i I 4116/9116;22,-_ - p9 94 l f WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT FABLE OF CONTENTS f ' 97 WASTEWATER UTILITIES, 1 . 1 , . , . , , .1...1....1. , 1 1 103 WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION...... 1 . 1 1 ' 108 k WASTEWATER TREATMENT ..,1.,.,,1,.1,.. 113 WASTEWATER COLLEC11ON..., 118 1 1 , 1 , . 1 , , 1.... k. NGINEERING, , WASTEWATER E 123 WASTEWATER LABORATORY. . 1 1 1.1......1 t , j v 05 4 gLr:"; is 1 a i I , , 96 1 i 1992 - 1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN WASTEWATER UTILITIES X 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT YEAR 1992 1993 1994 1996 1996 TOTAL NUMBERS CATEGORY 1 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IMP $3,630 $3,660 $70 $50 $100 $7,430 14 2 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EXP 1 0 25 0 276 301 3 LIFTSTATION IMPROVEMENTS 10 60 177 96 27 370 4 COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE 670 1,365 1,065 875 960 4,926 6 REPLACEMENT SEWER LINES 410 280 448 367 295 1,800 6 COLLECTION SYSTEM INFILL 50 60 60 670 460 11270 7 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWER LINES 260 250 260 250 260 11260 8 OVERSIZE WASTEWATER LINES 100 100 100 160 100 560 9 INFILTRATIONANFLOW 60 100 160 200 250 760 10 TAPS AND FIELD EQUIP 40 20 16 13 31 119 11 LABORATORY IMPROVEMENTS 81 43 86 60 56 326 12 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 148 287 47 67 272 all 13 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 0 16 0 0 5 20 14 OFFICE FURNITUREIEQUIPMENT 6 6 6 7 7 32 16 MISCELLANEOUS 96 14 10 18 22 160 TOTAL $6,642 $6,170 $2,489 $2,813 $3,100 $20,114 4122J91 9,27 s 4 992 DEPARTMENTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER EXPENDITURES _ BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DIVISIONS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 0451 ADMINISTRATION $5 $0 $5 $0 $0 0470 TREATMENT 3,727 3,619 108 0 0471 COLLECTION 1,708 1,120 484 29 75 0472 ENGINEERING 12 0 12 0 0 0481 LABORATORY 90 64 26 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR 1992 CIP $5,54-2 $4,803 $835 $29 $75 a I i 1 i ! 1 41221918,58 Pg j 1 r 1 1 j X1993 DEPARTMENTAL CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ~ WASTEWATER EXPENDITURES I BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DIVISIONS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 0451 ADMINISTRATION $5 $0 $5 $0 $0 s 0470 TREATMENT 31727 31545 119 0 63 0471 COLLECTION 21361 1,615 610 S 128 0472 ENGINEERING 13 0 13 0 0 1 0481 LABORATORY 64 23 41 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP $6,170 $5,1$3 $786 $8 $191 I I 1 4117191 17:37 pa 99 _ F! 1 ,t a El 994 DEPARTMENTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER EXPENDITURES BOND CURRENT AID-iN NUMBER DIVISIONS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 0451 ADMINISTRATION $5 $0 $5 $0 $0 0470 TREATMENT 282 188 87 0 7 0471 COLLECTION 21094 11355 714 12 13 0472 ENGINEERING 22 0 12 0 10 0481 LABORATORY 86 60 26 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 C1P $2,489 $1,603 $844 $12 $30 I. { f i 4117191 17;41 PO 100 r i DEPARTMENTAL C;~PiTAL IMPROVEMEHNT S~Jf~IMANY fi w~ 1995 nA STEWATER PE NDITURES 9GN0 CURREN AT ID IN i FUND REVENUE CONSTR 70T~HDERR NUMBER DIVISIONS TOTAL X 1000) AWAINI5TRATION $6 $0 $6 $0 $0 0451 156 98 52 0 8 0470 TREATMENT 1,895 643 12 17 047COLLECTION N 2567 2 0 2 0 0 0472 ENGINE!=RING 80 55 25 0 0 0461 LABORATORY TOTALS FOR YEAR 1995 CIP $2,813 $2,048 $728 $12 $25 . E I a i i Po 101 4!181919',28 s DEPARTMENTAL CAPITAL IM'i-'ROVENIENT SUMMARY 1996 WASTEWATER EXPENDITURES FBOND CURRENT AID-IN ~ DIVISIONS TOTAL FUND REENE CONSTR OTHER EN BER - X 1000) '$6 $0 $6 $0 $0 0451 ADMINISTRATION 470 375 31 0 64 0470 TREATMENT 2554 11760 667 30 97 0471 COLLECTION 2 0 0 0 0472 ENGINEERING 66 44 24 0 0 0481 LABORATORY TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1996 CIP $3,100 $2179 $730 $30 $161 t~ I k 1 I i f 1 Y.. 7 gyp.,,. I ~ g92 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY j 7 WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 0451 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN j NUMBER DESCRIPTION _ TOTAL FUND REVENUE_CONSTR OTHER - X 1000) f 92-0461-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIPU $6 $0 $5 $0 $0 I TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CIP 0 6 0 J i i 2122!908:10^~ 103 5 1993 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ; I 1 WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 0451 I PROJECTS BOND OURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) i 93-0451-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFU $5 $0 $5 $0 $0 I TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP 5 0 6 0, 0 I I - E , i I I i ' 1I E t I 3121f9l12;69 pn 104 ,i 1 I i ~as i ~i994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER j ADMINISTRATION 1 0461 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION._ TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR- OTHER (S X 1000) 94-0451-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFU $b $0 $b $0 $0 I , TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP b 0 5 I j s ~,a i~ 2/22190813 Pg 105 i - f-199g DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION - 0451 -BOND CURRENT AID-IN PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER ER DESCRIPTION NUMB - X 1000) I 96-0451-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFU $6 $0 $6 $0 $0 I TOTALS FOR YEAR -1995 CIP a 1 I I 1 022JO0 8t 14 I I Pg 106 j J t 1996 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ' I WASTEWATER f ADMINISTRATION 0451 PROJECTS 80 ND CURRENT AID-IN j NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 96-0451-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFU $6 $0 $6 $0 $0 1 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1996 CIP - 6 p 6 3 3 I t i i `i i ! J! f i i ] 2122190 8;16 p 107 J 111 I1992 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER TREATMENT 0470 PROJECTS _ - BOND CURRENT AIO-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) $7 $0 $7 $0 $0 92-0470-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 92-0470-02 BENEFICIAL SLUDGE REUSE PROGRAM $40 $25 $15 $0 $0 92-0470-03 800 MHz RADIOS $14 $14 $0 $o $0 92-0470-04 CONFINED SPACE ENTRY EQUIP $36 $0 $36 $0 $0 REVENUE SSWAGE FLOW METERS $30 $30 $0 $0 $0 92-0470-06 MNP 92-0470-06 OFFICE COMPUTER SYSTEM UPGRADE $10 $U $10 $0 $0 92-0470-07 SLUDGE FIELD IMPROVEMENTS $40 $0 $40 $0 $0 92-0470006 WWTP UPGRADE - 13 MGD $3,650 $3,550 $0 $0 $0 1 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CIP 3,727 3,619 108 0 0 I I 1 , 108 4116191 14:15 PO _ I ~Ae 1 U3 t?453 E993 DNiSION ~__,APITAL,IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER TREATMENT 0470 TR OTHER BOND CURRENT PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE ]A10-IN DESCRIPTION NUMBER x 1000) -4 $12 $0 $63 $75 $0 93-0470-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $25 $0 $25 $0 $0 STATION RENOVATION $10 . 0 $10 $0 $0 0_02 LIFT '0 93-047 ~ $35 $0 $ 93-0470-03 10T STATION SCADA (1 EA) $0 $0 I ! 93-0470-04 BENEFICIAL SLUDGEflEUSi PROGRAM $12 $0 $12 $0 $0 93-0470-05 PLANT SCADA COMPUTER $Jo $30 $0 $0 93-0474-06 SLUDGE FIELD IMPROVEMENTS $25 $0 $25 $0 $0 1 1, $0 $0 $0 93-0470.07 SPARE PUMP HOBSON L. S. $3,516 $3,515 93-0470006 WWTP UPGRADE - 13 MGD I 63 119 0 3,727 3,545 TOTALS fOR YEAR - 1993 CIP I P; i 1 3 1 a Pg 109 - - z { 7 RXAMk ff1994 , - DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER TREATMENT 0470 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND_ REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 94-0470-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $10 $0 $3 $0 $7 94-04%0-02 LIFT STATION RENOVATION $25 $0 $25 $0 $0 94-0470-03 LIFT STATION SCADA $14 $0 $14 $0 $0 94-0470-04 LAND PURCHASE $60 $50 $0 $0 $0 94-0470-05 IRRIGATION UTILIZATION $25 $0 $25 $0 $0 94-0470-06 REACTIVATE FT, WORTH DRIVE L, S. $72 $72 $0 $0 $0 94-047007 REACTIVATE HWY 380 L. S, $66 $66 $0 $0 $0 94-0470-08 SLUDGE FIELD IMPROVEMENTS $20 $0 $20 $0 $0 I i TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 C1P 282 188 87 0 7 I i i i I r ; f r 110 411619112;38 Pg { i i I ~i995 ~ ~~DIVISION CAPfTAL IMPROVEMENT SIJMMARY~_uJ WASTEWATER TREATMENT 0470 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER I _ X 1000) I 95-0470-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $12 $0 $4 $0 $8 95-0470-02 LIFT STATION RENOVATION $39 $0 $39 $0 $0 95-0470-03 LIFT STATION SCADA $9 $0 $9 $0 $0 95-0470-04 LAND PURCHASE $60 $60 $0 $0 $0 95-0470F08 REACTIVATE FT. WORTH DRIVE L, S. $34 $34 $0 $0 $0 7 96-047OF07 REACTIVATE HWY 380 L. S. $14 $14 $0 $0 $0 _i 1 TOTALS FOR YEAR 1995 CIP 168 98 62 0 8 i I I ~:f i j ..i ,i i i 111 - - - 4118191 12:40 Po. s 1 l:YSY..} i DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER TREATMENT 0470 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-1N NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 96-0470-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $68 $0 $4 $0 $64 98-0470-02 LIFT STATION RENOVATION $27 $0 $27 $0 $0 { 96-0470-04 LAND PURCHASE $50 $50 $0 $0 $0 98-0470-05 SLUDGE FIELD IMPROVEMENTS $50 $50 $0 $0 $0: y 96-0470-06 WWTP UPGRADE - IS MGD $278 $275 $0 $0. $0 i 470 375 31 0 64 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1990 CIP ; ,i t. . i t I _I f I 4 j t 411619112,42 pg 1!2 is 6 V8, DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY r WASTEWATER COLLECTION 0471 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER K 1000) 92-0471-01 OVERSIZE SEWER LINES $100 $100 $0 $0 $0 92-0471-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $141 $0 $66 $0 $75 92-0471-03 SEWER TAPS $29 $0 $0 $29 $0 92-0471-04 REPLACE SEWER LINE STREET PROGRA $150 $0 $t50 $0 $U 92-0471-05 INFILTRATION INFLOW CORRECTION $50 $60 $0 $0 $0 92-0471-06 REPLACE MISCELLANEOUS SEWER LINES $260 $0 $260 $0 $0 92-0471-07 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT $8 $0 $8 $0 $0 92-0471-08 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWER LINES $280 $250 $0 $0 $0 92-0471-09 COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE SEWER $216 $216 $0 $0 $0 92-0471-10 WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM INFI $60 $60 $0 $0 $0 92-0471009 COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE SEWER $465 $456 $0 $0 $0 ~.I TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CIP $1,708 $1,120 $484 $29 $75 rt~ I I :.i 'I I I I :a 4122191 8:39 PO 113 of )t MIX P Ysd!Rt,~ey ,Mov&~ 1993 -DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUN1fviARY~W~~ WASTEWATER COLLECTION 0471 PROJECTS -T~ BOND CURRENT AID-1N NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 93-0471-01 OVERSIZE SEWER LINES $100 $100 $0 $0 $0 93-0471-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $200 $0 $72 $0 $128 93-0471-03 SEWER TAPS $8 $0 $0 $8 $0 ' 93-0471-04 REPLACE SEWER LINE STREET PROGRA $170 $0 $170 $0 $0 j t 93-0471-05 INFILTRA', ION INFLOW CORRECTION $100 $100 $0 $0 $0 r 93-0471-06 REPLACE MISCELLANEOUS SEWER LINES $110 $0 $110 $0 $0 93-0471-07 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWER LINES $250 $0 $260 $0 $0 93-0471-08 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT $8 $0 $8 $0 $0 93-0471-09 COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE SEWER $205 $205 $0 $0 $0 93-0471-10 WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM INFI $50 $50 $0 $0 $0 A3-0471009 COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE SEWER $270 $270 $0 $0 $0 93-0471C09 COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE SEWER $890 $890 $0 $0 $0 i TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP $2,361 $1,616 $610 $8 $128 j i I I j i I i I _ i t , i 114 f 4117191 18:22 Pg _ , S 1994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER COLLECTION 0471 PROJECTS BOND Ct1RRENT AID-IN [NUMBER DESCRIPTION 'TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 94-0471-01 OVERSIZE SEWER LINES $100 $100 $0 $0 $0 94-0471-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $19 $0 $6 $0 $13 94-0471-03 SEWER TAPS $12 $0 $0 $12 $0 94-0471-04 REPLACE SEWER LINE STREET PROGRA $200 $0 $200 $0 $0 94-0471-05 INFILTRATION INFLOW CORRECTION $160 $150 $0 $0 $0 94-0471-06 REPLACE MISCELLANEOUS SEWER LINES $248 $0 $248 $0 $0 94-0471-07 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT $10 $0 $10 $0 $0 3 94-0471-08 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWER LINES $250 $0 $250 $0 $0 94-0471-09 COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE SEWER $180 $180 $0 $0 $0 94-0471-10 WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM INFI $60 $50 $0 $0 $0 - 94-0471E09 COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE SEWER $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 94-0471D09 COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE SEWER $875 $875 $0 $0 $0 j TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP $2,094 $1,355 $714 $12 $13 ( i f 4117/91 16129 PO 1 J 5 { SION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY 1995 - - _ WASTEWATER COLLECTION 0471 N BOND CURR=TA PROJECTS T OTAL FUND REVETR OTHER NUMBER DESCRIPTION X 1000) $150 $150 $0 $0 $0 95-0471-01 OVERSIZE SEWER LINES 95-0471-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $33 $0 $116 $p $17 12 $ - $12 $0 $4 $ „0 0 $0 140 $ 95_0471_03 SEWER TAPS 95-0471-04 REPLACE SEWER LINE STREET PROGRA $140 $ $ $p $0 95-0471-05 INFILTRATION INFLOW CORRECTION $200 $200 $0 250 $0 $0 95-0471-06 REPLACE MISCELLANEOUS SEWER LINES $227 $0 $$227 $0 $0 95-0471-07 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWER LINES $$50 $0 $10 $0 $0 - 95-0471-08 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT $p $0 95-0471-09 WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM INFI $50 $50 $0 $Q $ $0 ) 95-0471D09 COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE SEWER $875 $875 $0 $0 0 95-0471 F09 COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE SEWER $620 $620 $0 0 $0 $0 t. 96-0471E09 COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE SEWER $0 $0 $ TOTALS FOR YEAR 1995 CIP $2,567 $1,895 $643 $12 - $17 l k III j PO 116 _ - W _ 4118191 9:9 t i f A 11 iI ~ YES! 7 1996 _ DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER I COLLECTION 0471 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AI15-1N NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER I I X 1000) 96-0471-01 OVERSIZE SEWER LINES $100 $100 $0 $0 $0 , 96-0471-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $204 $0 $107 $0 $97 96-0471-03 SEWER TAPS $30 $0 $0 $30 $0 s 96-0471-04 REPLACE ;;EWER LINE STREET PROGRA $50 $0 $50 $0 $0 96-0471-05 INFILTRATION INFLOW CORRECTION $250 $250 $0 $0 $0 96-0471-06 REPLACE MISCELLANEOUS SEWER LINES $245 $0 $246 $0 $0 96-0471-07 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWER LINES $250 $0 $260 $0 $0 96-0471-08 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT $15 $v $15 $0 $0 96-'0471-09 WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM INFI $50 $50 $0 $0 $0 96-0471E09 COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE SEWER $960 $960 $0 $0 $0 ..I 96-0471F09 COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE SEWER $400 $400 $0 $0 $0 j TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1996 CIP $2,564 $1,760 $667 $30 $97 I I 4117191 16r36 p0 117 s4vroxn I - DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVtMENT SUMMA 1992 ------~---I WASTEWATER ENGMEENNG 0472 BOND CURRENT NIO-1N TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTH~ PROJECTS DESCRIPTION NUMBER - X 1000) $a $0 $0 $11 $11 92-0472-01 FIELD EQUIPMENT $1 $0 $1 $a $o, 92-0472-02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT FURNITURE ¢ - 12 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CIP 1 1 i I ii i i _I 214190 1319 E I i k,. „ 1 ; L1993 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY , WASTEWATER ENGINEERING I' 0472 PROJECTSBOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTH@R X 1000) 93-0472-01 FIELD EQUIPMENT $12 $0 $12 $0 $0 i 93-0472-02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT & FURNITUHE $1 $0 $1 $0 , $0 _j 17 1 - ; - 0 13 - 0 O { TOTALS FOR YEAR -1993 CIP j i i , 1 I 11419016:23 _ _ _ _?Q._ 119 i j 41 f 1994 _ DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER ENGINEERING 0472 PROJECTS^! BOND CURRENT AID-IN : j NUMBER _ DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (s x 1000) 94-0472-01 FIELD EQUIPMENT $3 $0 $3 $0 $0 94-0472-02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 > 94-0472-03 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $18 $0 i8 $0 $10 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 GIP 22 0 12 0 10 r I ~ i I i I 120 1124190 9:18 Pg _ WOO t 199 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER ENGINEERING ,.1 0472 BOND CURRENT A1D• IN PROJECTS DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CON3TR OTHER NUMBER _ - , t$ x 1000} 95-0472-01 FIELD EQUIPMENT' $1 W $1 $0 $0 ` 95-0472-02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 ..1 2 0 ~ 2^ d ~ TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 GIP ) I .a i I 112619013,44 f ff4ow f 1996 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER ENGINEERING j 0472 PROJECTS BONG CURRENT AID-IN ' DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER i NUMBER - X 1000) i 96-0472-01 FIELD EQUIPMENT $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 fff 96-0472-02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE $t $0 $1 $0 $0 I i TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1996 CIP i i k i j i i 122 1419018,16 PQ.._ i 2.._ L-1!-4 s, fYn 1' GhHYE"? y I 'ry I1992 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY - - I ' WASTEWATER i LABORATORY 0481 F- -PROJFCTSBOND CURRENT AID-iN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER 10, X 1000) 92-0481-01 LABORATORY CASEWORK MAINT $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 92-0481-02 DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM $3 $0 $3 $0 $0 j 92-0481-03 GAS CHROMIMASS SPEC (GCIMS) $64 $64 $0 $0 $0 92-0461-04 LABORATORY SINK FUME HOOD $2 $0 $2 $0 $0 1 92.0481-05 SPILL PREVENTIONIDISQ EQUIP $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 1 92-0481-06 PRETREATMENT PROGRAM EQUIPMENT $10 $0 $10 $0 $0' 92-0481-07 SLIDE PRESENTATION EQUIPMENT $1 $0 $ 1 $0 $0 92-0481-08 MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SYS $5 $0 $5 $0 $0 92-0481-09 CONFINED SPACE ENTRY $3 $0 $3 $0 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CiP 9064 26 0 ~ 0 I f i .1 I ' f j 4116191 16:53 PO 123 i 3N • ' Vs1Yni':a 1 i:kiNlK+ 1993`- ~,yDIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY 1 WASTEWATER LABORATORY 0481 PROJECTS _J BOND CURRENT A=ROTHER NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE C($ X 1000) 93-0481-01 LABORATORY CASEWORK MAINT $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 $0 $0 93-0481-02 REPLACEMENT LABORATORY EQUIP $23 $23 $0 $0 $0 93-0481-03 DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM $$4 $0 $$14 $0 $0 93-0481-04 PRETREATMENT PROGRAM $6 $0 $8 $0 $0 93-0481-06 WATERSHED MONITORIN $5 $0 $5 $0 $0 93-0481 -06 HVAC RENOVATION $12 $0 $12 $0 $0 93-0481-07 VEHICLE (NEW) TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP 64 23 41 u 0 , 1 , i PO 124 - 4!18!9118:13 _ - 1 ( P 1994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER - I LABORATORY ' 0481 ~I PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER x 1000) 94-0481-01 INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA SPEC $60 $60 $0 $0 $0 94-0481-02 LABORATORY EOUIPMENT $4 $0 $4 $0 $0 "r I f 94-0481-03 DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM $2 $0 $2 $0 $0 94-0481-04 PRETREATMENT PROGRAM $14 $0 $14 $0 $0 94-0481-05 WATERSHED MONITORING $6 $0 $6 $0 $0 J i - TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP 88 60 26 0 0 I I ~J 4116191 16:27 Pg 125 k a ,fey' i •tP 1995 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMA L-_ _ - WASTEWATER LABORATORY 0481 PROJECTS 80ND CUNRENT AID-IN TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUMBER ` DESCRIPTION - r... X 1000) 1 $0 $0 $0 96_0481_01 LIQUID CHflOM11NFNAREDSPEC $55 $55 $5 $0 $5 $0 $p $2 $0 $2 $p $p 95-0481-02 MICROSCOPE VIDEO SYSTEM 95-0481-03 OZONE MONITORING EQUIPMENT $12 $0 $12 $0 $p UIPMEN7 0 $h 96-0481-04 MOBILE EO $5 $0 $B $ 95-0481-05 WATERSHED MONITORING 80b5 25 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR 1995 CIP ,I ! i j t_ I c I i ~ i i 1 Py 12b k 4/16191 18;38 _ i _ Vic , _ _ r... 1 P.Yiikke` r 6 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER lI . ~ LABORATORY 0481 PROJECTS - BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER - IN 1 X 1000) 96-0481-01 LAB RENOVATION $22 $22 $0 $0 j 96-0481-02 DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM $0 96-0481-02 PRETREATMENT PROGRAM EQUIP $0 $2 $0 $0 $112 2 $0 $12 $0 $0 3 96-0481-04 WATERSHED MONITORING EQUIP $7 $0 $7 96-0481-08 GAS CHROMATOGRAPH $2 $0 $0 .2 $22 $o $o $o TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1996 CIP 68 44 24 0 p 147 .J t 411619116A8 pg 127 y { r i k t ,.Y E ` I E , E s, r t , E f~ l ~ i ~ i t 1 128 t 1 0.d;l~triY i - t COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT a~ TABLE OF CONTENTS COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMINISTRATION . . . . . 131 DRAINAGE ..............................................142 EQUIPMENT SERVICES-GARAGE 147 EQUIPMENT SERVICES-MACHINE SHOP 152 SOLID WASTE-RESIDENTIAL . . . . 157 SOLID WASTE-COMMERCIAL . . . . . . 162 SOLID WASTE-DISPOSAL.. , , 167 ENERGY MANAGEMENT . . . 172 l . I _f 129 e Y 1 t i `i tll"'a t i k 130 1992 - 1996 CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENTS PLAN COMMUNITY SERVICES x 1000 GROUP ASSIGNMENT YEAR 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 TOTAL NUMBERS CATEGORY 1 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT $67 $7 $0 $0 $0 74 2 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 17 8 0 0 0 25 3 OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 1 6 9 12 13 43 4 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 742 482 438 471 506 2639 k 5 BOND ISSUES 1,445 1,656 2,360 1,545 0 7006 6 MISC. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 17 27 18 14 146 222' ; i 7 LANDFILL CONSTRUCTION 0 42 15 3,500 0 3557 E 8 LANDFILL MAINTENANCE 0 45 15 0 0 60 ; 9 RECYCLING PROGRAM EQUIPMENT 5 0 0 0 0 5 10 MISCELLANEOUS 69 350 15 48 50 532 i 412319111:6 $2,363 $2,625 $2,870 $5,590 $715 $14,163 , ~J i i f.. U,tYa75Vs t kVA' •1H 11992 DEPARTMENTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY COMMUNITY SERVICES f BOND CUARENT AtD-IN NUMBER DIVISIONS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) f 0800 ADMINISTRATION $12 $0 $12 $0 $0 0810 DRAINAGE 1,763 1,445 248 0 TO 0580 EQUIPMENT SERVICES - G 33 0 21 0 12 0581 EQUIPMENT SERVICES - M 6 0 6 0 0 0801 SOLID WASTE - RESIDENTI 182 0 104 0 78 0802 SOLID WASTE - COMMERCI 200 0 200 0 0 0803 SOLID WASTE - DISPOSAL 150 0 15D 0 0 0257 ENERGY MANAGEMENT 17 0 17 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CIP $2,363 $1,445 $758 $0 $160 r i f Pg 132 4126!9111,33 E S rs:rcxv.Ay af!artl.& ;rs 1993 DEPARTMENTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY COMMUNITY SERVICES E BOND CURRENT AID-IN TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUMBER DIVISIONS X 1000) 0800 ADMINISTRATION $7 $0 $7 $0 $0 0810 DRAINAGE 1,874 607 1,097 0 170 E 0580 EQUIPMENT SERVICES - G 270 0 20 0 250 0581 EQUIPMENT SERVICES - M 7 0 7 0 0 0801 SOLID WASTE - RESIDENTI 164 0 164 0 Q 0802 SOLID WASTE - COMMERCI 194 0 194 0 0 j 0803 SOLID WASTE - DISPOSAL 103 0 103 0 0 0257 ENERGY MANAGEMENT 6 0 6 0 0 I TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP $2,625 $607 $1,598 $0 $420 i I i i F'0 133 I 4/18191 10;27 i f I (1994 DEPARTMENTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY COMMUNITY SERVICES BOND CUfiRENT AID-IN NUM8GR DIVISIONS TOTAL FUND REVEtJUE CONSTR QTF4I=R X 1000) r 0800 ADMINISTRATION $3 $0 $3 $0 $0 0810 DRAINAGE 2,527 2,038 372 0 117 0580 EQUIPMENT SERVICES - G 25 0 25 0 0 0581 EQUIPMENT SERVICES - M 6 0 6 0 0 0801 SOLID WASTE r- RESIDENTI 146 0 146 0 0 0802 SOLID WASTE - COMMERCI 111 0 111 0 0 0803 SOLID WASTE - DISPOSAL 46 0 46 0 0 0257 ENERGY MANAGEMENT 6 0 6 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP $2,870 $2,038 $715 $0 $117 I i. 1 I -1 r l k 3 j 417819t 10;28 _ Py 134 I k I IFF" MM A FFSAPi:22-- tb V Ir' I I 1995 DEPARTMENTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY I I' COMMUNITY SERVICES BAND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBS DIVISIONS TOTAL FUND REVENUE GONSTR OTHER 3 t$ X 1000) 4 0800 ADMINISTRATION $4 $0 $4 $0 $0 0810 DRAINAGE 1,824 1,545 3 0 276 0580 EQUIPMENT SERVICES - G 11 0 11 0 0 0581 EQUIPMENT SERVICES - M 15 0 15 0 0 3 0801 SOLID WASTE - RESIDENTI 180 0 180 0 0 0802 SOLID WASTE - COMMERCI 48 0 48 0 0 j 0803 SOLID WASTE - DISPOSAL 3,502 0 0 0 31502 0257 ENERGY MANAGEMENT _ 6 0 6 0 0 j j TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP $5,590 $1,545 $267 $0 $3,778 C 1 i 4119191 15,16 Pg 135 :1 3 tY1rGY.: 1 3 j 19 DEPARTMENTAL CAPfTAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY i COMMUNITY SERVICES j i f BOND CURRENT AID-IN TR OTHER NUMBER DIVISIONS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONS X 1000) r.. . 0 0 $ I 0800 ADMINISTRATION $4 $0 $4 $0 $0 0810 DRAINAGE 380 0 380 0 0 10580 EQUIPMENT SERVICES - G 17 0 17 0 0 0581 EQUIPMENT SERVICES - M 18 0 18 0 0 0801 SOLID WASTE - RESIDENTI 94 0 94 0 0 1 0802 SOLID WASTE - COMMERCI 180 0 180 0 0 0803 SOLID WASTE - DISPOSAL 2 0 2 0 0 i 0257 ENERGY MANAGEMENT 20 0 9 _ 0 11 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1996 CIP $715 $0 $704 $0 $11 f i ~ I r I L 1 136 4118191 10 31 1 t i a ` '1992 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY r] COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 0800 IPROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (i x 1000) r _ 92-0800-01 UPGRADE RADIO SYSTEM TO 800 MEGAH $4 $0 $4 $0 $0 92-0800-02 PS280 IBM COMPUTER 8 0 8 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CIP 812 $0 $12 SO SD i , I I 4116191 14:12_ P9 37 1 fttiY€iJr14 f v , 1993 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT "UMMAPY COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 0800 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-1N NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHEF, (6 X 1000) 93-0600-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPORT EQUI $2 SO 92 $0 SO E 93-0800-02 NEW PERSONAL COMPUTER 5 0 5 0 0 I i TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP $7 SO $7 i0 $0 , {1 i k i 2111191 11:19 _ pit 138 X54: I 1994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 0800 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (i X 1000) ,j 94-090041 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPORT EQUI $3 $0 $3 $0 50 E i TOTALS FOR YEAR -1994 CIP so $3 i { I 1 7 211319110,46 PQ 139 i t4h!la1f,9 ACs'4.UiFf~ r j 1996 DIVISION CAPITA! IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 0800 PROJECT'S BOND CURRENT A11)AN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND RFVENUE CONSTR OTHER 1000) 964800-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPORT EQUI $4 ;0 84 SO 30. Ir , ; t E 4._ TOTALS FOR YEAR - 18sil9 CIP $4 t0 $4 t0 $0 4.. r-' I i' -1 L I I L~ I j i 140 2!13!9110;49 P I iAn YRL.'t'c~ v f jyr R i d 1996 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 0800 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN INUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUF CONSTR OTHER (S X 1000) 984800-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPORT EQUI $4 SO $4 30 i0 I TOTALS FOR YEAR -1998 CIP 3 $0 $4 so I 2!13191 10:64 141 I Y) i:'aCCtiN p ~ Awl 1992 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY COMMUNITY SERVICES DRAINAGE 0810 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT A10-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 92-0810-01 SAFETY EQUIPMENT $5 $0 $0 $0 $5 92-0810-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-•-(R)12 YD DUMP TR $46 $0 $26 SO $20 I 92-0810-03 UPGRADE RADIO SYSTEM TO 800 MEGAH $9 $0 $9 $0 $0 92-0810-04 MOBILE EQUIPMENT--(R)314 TON PICKUP $13 $0 $13 $0 $0 92-0810-05 MOBILE EQUIPMENT--(N)SIDE BOOM MO 546 $0 $0 $0 $45 92-0810-06 PECAN CREEK DRAINAGE: BRADSHAW T $349 8349 $0 $0 $0 92-0810-07 HOLLYHILL LONGRIDGE $292 $292 $0 $0 50 92-0810-08 COOPER CREEK CHANNEL $804 $804 $0 $0 $0 ' 92-0810-09 GRADALL(R) $170 $0 $170 $0 $0 , 92-0810-10 MOBILE EQUIPMENT--(R)112 TON PICKUP $13 $0 $13 $0 $0 92-08`10-11 BOBCAT LOADER (N) $18 SO $18 $0 SO TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CIP 1763 1446 246 0 70 I 'I I j I I I ( II 4118191 11:63 I In"4"snl'~ P::VIl4r~ 'r 1993 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY j r COMMUNITY SERVICES DRAINAGE 0810 - PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN TR OTHER NUMBER DESCi'PTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONS j$ x 1000) 93-0810-01 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS $3 $0 $3 $0 $0 93-0810-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT STREET SWEEPE $120 $0 $120 $0 $0 93-0810-03 COOPER CREEK DRAINAGE PHASE II $608 $0 $808 $0 $0 93-0810-04 WILSON, MORSE, ALEXANDER AREA DRAI $138 $0 $138 $0 $0 93-0810-05 AVENUE G DRAINAGE $131 $0 $131 s0 $0 93-0810-06 PECAN CREEK DOWNTOWN MASTER PLA $52 $0 $52 s0 $0 93-0810-07 PECAN CREEK DRAINAGE NEAR ROBERT $607 $807 $0 $0 $0 j 93-0910-08 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 6 YARD DUMP TR $36 $0 $0 s0 $36 93-0810-09 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 12 YARD DUMP T $46 $0 $46 $0 $0 93-0810-10 MOBILE EQUIPMENT RUBBER TIRE LO $87 $0 $0 $0 $87 93-0810-11 MOBILE EQUIPMENT BACKHOE (R) $47 $0 $0 s0 $47 TOTALS FOR YEAR 1993 CIP 1,874 607 1,097 0 170 4116191 12:11 P9 143~µV~` - - - T7 1 14 p1 f3'Ed%65 i 1994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY COMMUNITY SERVICES DRAINAGE 0810 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-1N NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER I (3 X 1000) 94-0810-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT (R) HAUL TRUCK $89 $0 50 $0 $69 94-0810-02 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS $3 $0 t0 $0 $3 94-0810-03 PECAN CREEK ALONG UNIVERSITY $322 $0 $322 $0 $0 94-D810-04 PECAN CREEK: KERLEYTO WOODROW $1,396 $1,396 $0 $0 i0 k 94-0010-06 COOPER CREEK IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1 $843 3843 $0 $0 $0 94-0810-06 MOBILE EQUIPMENT--(N) 12 YD DUMP TR $46 $0 $0 bq ;46 94-0810-07 MOBILE EQUIPMENT - D~ -3 DOZER $60 $0 $60 $0 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP 2,627 2,038 372 0 117 I r- ` i 1 t i J II l I 1 I , f E 4/1619112;16 Y FFS.yfJf,~{ 1995 DIVIAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY SION C ' - COMMUNITY SERVICES I DRAINAGE t 0810 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUMBER DESCRIPTION (5 X 1000) I $3 $0 $3 $0 i0 _ 95-0810-01 MISCELLANEOUST001S 95-0610-02 SEQUOIA PARKDRAINA3E $1,041 $1,041 50 $0 $0 96-0010-03 MOBILE EQUIPMENT - TRACK LOADER (R) $2276 t$4 $0 $2~ 95-0610-04 THUNDERBIRD DRAINAGE 76 f 95-0810-05 COOPER CREEK (BRANCH) $84 $90 $ 0 $0 0 $0 so so b' 95-0810-06 DANIELSIFT, WORTH DRIVE DRAINAGE $330 $330 - i 1,824 1,645 3 0 276 TOTALS FOR YEAR -1995 CIP I t 1 i ~ A _.i Pg 145 4116191 12:68 a. i r 4 1996 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY COMMUNITY SERVICES DRAINAGE 0810 BOND CURRENT AID-IN PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUMBER DESCRIPTION (S X 1000) $a 96-9810-01 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS a130 $o ;130 $0 130 0 130 0 0 96-0810-02 STREET SWEEPER $i20 $0 1120 98-0810-03 CAMEL TRUCK $0 $0 $380 $0 $380 =0 EO ' TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1998 CIP S { i 4 1 Pg 146 4116191 1143, j i s i ,I i 1992 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY f ~ COMMUNITY SERVICES EQUIPMENT SERVICES - GARAGE i 0580 E BOND CURRENT AID N 'i PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER i NUMBER DESCRIPTION (S X 1000) 92-0580-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT--PARTS TRUCK $16 $0 $0 $0 $12 I ` 92-0580-02 REPLACE TIRE CHANGE MACHINE 92-0580-03 UPGRADE RADIO SYSTEM TO 800 MEGAH $10 $0 $10 S0 $0 92-0580-04 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS & EQUIPMENT $2 $D y p " 21 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 GIP 33 0 12 1 i .....E ' l W i ~ 2111191 7:49 __°Pg 47 N.+^ atira.sss{ l%7 I F 1g93 _ DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY COMMUNITY SERVICES EQUIPMENT SERVICES - GARAGE 0580 BOND CURRENT AID-IN PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER DESCRIPTION [NUMBER (a X 1000? 1 ~ F 93-0580-01 NEW FLEET MAINTENANCE CENTER $250 $0 $0 $o a250 EO 93-0580-02 NEW EMISSION CONTROL ANALYZER a3 a0 a3_ $4 $0 93-0580-03 INSTALL OVERFILL SUCKFTS ON FUEL TA $4 93-0580-04 MISCELLANEOUS BALANCE MACHINE IPMEN as0 a0 $10 $0 $0 93-0580-05 REPLACE TIRE 270 0 20 0 260 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP i , j P9 148 I, 2!28!918.43 r nl1 c~164P+ 1 i DIVISION CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY 1994 } COMMUNITY SERVICES ' EQUIPMENT SERVICES - GARAGE { 0580 `"BOND CURRENT AID-IN PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUMBER DESCRIPTION (s x 1000) 94-0680-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT SERVICE TRUCK $16 $0 $16 $0 $0 94-0580-02 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEN $6 $Q $6 $0 s0 94-0680-03 REPLACE AIR COMPRESSOR l r <.J TOTALS FOR YEAR -1694 CIP 25 0 26 0 0 4 t `j P4 149 _ r 2111191 t i a 4 895 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY L1 - I COMMUNITY SERVICES EQUIPMENT SERVICES - GARAGE 0580 BOND CURRENT =AID-IN AL FUND REVENUE 1 PROJECTS TOT UMBfiR aIPTION N X 1000) " $e $0 W 95 $0 1 -06 80-01 REPLACE TWO TRANSMISSION JACKS $6 $0 so 95.05"42 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS MPACT EQUIPMEN $3 $2 $0 $a $2 $0 96-0580-`43 REPLA ~ I 0 0 11 0 11 TOTALS FOR YEAR -1995 CIP l I J"- j y 1 I 1 S p0 150 I 2113191 12:27 i r i s 1996 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY COMMUNITY SERVICES EQUIPMENT SERVICES - GARAGE 0580 IPROJECTS FOND CURRENT AD-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FOND REVENUE CONS" OTHER (S X 1000) 96-4)680-01 REPLACE 3 SETS OVERHEAD HOSE REEL $16 $0 $16 $0 $0 96-0580-02 REPLACE OFFICE CHAIRS $1 $0 $1 $0 i0 TOTAL, FOR YEAR -1996 CIP 17 0 17 0 0 I~ I i I 2/11/91 10:8 Pg 151 1 APITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY DIVISIONC 1992 1 COMMUNITY SERVICES EQUIPMENT SERVICES - MACHINE SHOP Fr-- 0581 BOND CURRENT ONSTR OTHER y PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CNST NUMBER ~ESCRiPTION } (S X 1000) -l $2 $O so . 92-0881-01 UPGRADE RADIO SYSTEM TO 860 MEC~AH $2 $0 $2 $0 SO 92-0681-02 REPLACE WIRE WELDER $2 $0 $2 $0 SO 92-0681-03 REPLACE WELDING GAUGES, 6 0 8 0 ` I TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 GIP 1 1 j I P 152 i 2112191 13,10 i i 1 t ry kx:n : T 7 .a i i 1983 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY i COMMUNITY SERVICES EQUIPMENT SERVICES - MACHINE SHOP 0581 E BOND CURRENT AID-IN PROJECTS NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (S X 1000) 93-0581-Ot MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEN $2 SO $2 $0 SO Yj 93-0581-02 REPLACE MISC WELDING HOSES & REELS $2 SO $2 $0 SO 93-0581-03 REPLACE SECOND WIRE WELDER $3 $0 $3 SO t0 y I TOTALS FOR YEAR -1993 CIP 7 0 7 0 0 1 211219113,33 Pg 153 t ~9♦ r f r> 1 (^1994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY COMMUNITY SERVICES EQUIPMENT SERVICES - MACHINE SHOP 0581 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (S x 1000) 94-0581-01 REPLACE PORTABLE WELDER $4 $0 $4 $0 $0 94-0581-02 REPLACE FLOOR JACKS (2) $2 $0 $2 SO 50 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP 5 0 8 0 0 fi l[ ;I I i 154 L211 91 12'45 P9 I 1 t 1995 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY COMMUNITY SERVICES EQUIPMENT SERVICES - MACHINE SHOP 0581 F PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-4N NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 96-0581-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT--314 TON TRUCK $15 $0 $15 $0 $0 t TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP 15 0 is 0 0 a I ~ r a i 2117191 8;41 pg 155 t DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY 1498 I 'TY SERVICES ` ,OMMUNl EQUIPMENT SERVICES - MACHINE SHOP 058 BOND CURRENT AID-IN ¢RO,fCOTS TOTAL FUND RE OTHER DESCRIPTION VENUE CONSTR J. NUMBER X t 000) ` $0 S0 S48 l g8-0681-41 M09ILEEQUIPMENT--WELDINGTRUCK S48 ~0 I 1 . 0 n 0 ,I i, 18 ~a TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1998 CIP I ~ r I. 1 4.` 156 j 2/1719) 14;10 - I F1092 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY { COMMUNITY SERVICES SOLID WASTE - RESIDENTIAL 0801 i j PROJECTS BOND CURRENT NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE_GONSTR OTHER I I X 1000) 92-0801-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT--REAR LOAD TRUC $78 $0 $0 $0 $78 i 92-0801-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT--REAR LOAD TRUC $78 $0 $78 $0 $0 i 1 92-0801-03 NEW PERSONAL COMPUTER $5 $0 $5 $0 $0 92-0801-04 UPGRADE RADIO SYSTEM TO BOO MEGAH 1120 $0 $20 SO $0 -E 92-0801-06 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 _A TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 C1P 182 0 104 0 78 i I i i f t 157 4!23!919;47 Pg - E, sl VA ~i 1993 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY COMMUNITY SERVICES SOLID WASTE - RESIDENTIAL 0801 PROJEti'TS BOND CURRENT AID4N - NUM8ER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (i x 1000) t 93-0801-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-REAR LOAD TRUCK $82 SO $92 s 93-0801-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-REAR LOAD TRUCK $82 $0 $82 sso TOTALS FOR YEAR -1993 CIP 164 0 164 0 0 i ! e__ 2121190 14:52 158 i ~f E' I + 1994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY i COMMUNITY SERVICES SOLID WASTE - RESIDENTIAL 0801 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER f (S X 1000) 94-0801-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-REAR LOAD TRUCK $86 $0 $88 $0 $0 94-0801-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT--12 YD REAR LOAD $80 SO $ 0 $0 $0 ,..A TOTALS FOR YEAR -19114 CIP 148 0 148 0 0 I~ j 1 I i 159 21'21 /90 14:32 PO 53 °i 995 IS1 N CAPITAL ImPROVEMEN7 SUMMARY I 1 J 1---- COMMUNITY SERVICES SOLID WASTE - RESIDENTIAL 0801 F ' BOND CURRENT AID-IN PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUMBER DESCRIPTION (5 X 1000) ; 50 g1y_p601-01 MGBJLE EQUIPMENT--REAR LOAD TRUCK 590 50 $90 SO 05-ml-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-REAR LOAD TRUCK $90 50 $90 $0 160 0 180 0 C TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CSP 11 , . t i ` i i t i 160 pli 9:1 Ar15tA1 1 1 't f i - 1996 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY COMMUNITY SERVICES SOLID WASTE - RESIDENTIAL f 0801 PRUJECTS BOND CURRENT jU0. N NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REMUE CONEM OTMI (s x 1 o00) 96-0801-01 MOBILE EQUIPMMT-AFAA LOAD TRUCK 394 TO s" $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR -1986 C:p 94 0 94 0 i i . 212019014:29 P9 lul i 2 VISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY DI - =9K R COMMUNITY SERVICES SOLID WASTE - COMMERCIAL f 0802 BOND CURRENT AID-IN PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER NUMBER DESCRIPTION X 1000) 17 $0 92-0802-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT--FRONT LOAD TRU $117 $0 $$41 $0 $0 20 $0 $20 $0 $0 92-0802-02 EQUIPMENT (FRONTLOAD DUMPSTERS) $$41 $0 92-0802-03 UPGRADE EQUIPMENT (ROLL OFF) 92-0802-04 UPGRADE RADIO SYSTEM TO 800 MEGAH $22 $0 $22 $0 $0 2- Op up 200 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR -1992 CIP r,. j r i- j Py 162 - 4l2319110.0 . LA• i 1993 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY Y COMMUNITY SERVICES I' SOLID WASTE - COMMERCIAL 0802 SOND CURRENT A10-iN PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER ~ ,VUMBEri DESCRIPTION (3 X 1000) 93-0802-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT--ROLL OFF TRUCK $$4 SO $94 $0 $0 ~ 93-0802-02 EQUIPMENT (FRQNTLOAD OUMPSTERS) $4 s $ $0 $0 93-0002-03 OUMPSTER SCREENING $0 $0 $32 so ~ ~ 93-0802-04 DUMPSTER SCREENING TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP 194 0 194 0 0 a ~ I a , i 2J12191 M40 p 1 G3 i I Ott r 1994 DIVISION CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY COMMUNITY SERVICES SOLID WASTE - COMMERCIAL. 0802 BOND CURRENT A1D-IN TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSFR OTHER PROJECTS 1 NUMBER DESCRIPTION ` (S X 1000) 1 , 94-0802-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-ROLL OFF TRUCK i9E SO $96 .1 s 94-0802-02 EQUIPMENT (FRONTLOAD DUMPSTERS) $16 $0 Sib $0 $0 111.. 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR -1494 CIP 111 0 r~ 1 I P 164 2JI712114123 1 _ 4--~ ' I C'? 1995 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY COMMUNITY SERVICES ` SOLID WASTE - COMMERCIAL I 0802 f I PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-1N ' TR OTHER NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONS I I (S X 1000) 96-0602-01 EQUIPMENT (FRONT LOAD DUMPSTERS) $W ~ $m s so 96-0602-02 EQUIPMENT (ROLL OFF) $14 so f TOTALS FOR YEAR -1906 CIP 48 0 48 0 0 k k ` p pa;~ t 31271916:46 pg 165 _J ..ter tLhr C ' .-...jai F1996 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY i COMMUNITY SERVICES SOLID WASTE - COMMERCIAL 0802 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AIDAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHI i X 1000) 96-0902-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-FRONT LOAD TAU $130 $0 $130 $0 i~ 96-=2-02 EQUIPMENT (FRONT LOAD DUMPSTER9) $80 $0 $50 $0 i0 TOTALS FOR YEAR -1996 CIP 180 0 180 0 i. , I_ i t j Mi 1 I M y 166 2118191 1611 p 1 1 n 1992 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY J COMMUNITY SERVICES SOLID WASTE - DISPOSAL 0803 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN FUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER x 1000) 92-0803-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT COMPACTOR $150 $0 $150 $0 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 C1P 150 0 1S0-~ 0. 0 ' I 4118191 8:51 PO 167 - -J MEN ) 1993 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY t COMMUNITY SERVICES SOLID WASTE - DISPOSAL 0803 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN - TP, OTHER NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONS X 1000) 93-0803-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT--WATER TRUCK $9 $0 $9 $0 $0 93-0803-02 FLEXIBLE MEMBRANE LINER $42 $0 $42 $0 $0 93-0803-03 LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM $45 $0 $45 $0 $0 93-0803-04 UPGRADE RADIO SYSTEM TO 800 MEGAH $7 $0 $7 $0 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 OIP 103 0 103 0 0 i E I , 41181916:32 168 1 MEMO, Y .a t I I 1994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEM TEN SUMMARY i~ - z COMMUNITY SERVICES SOLID WASTE - DISPOSAL 0803 BOND CURRENT AID'IN PROJECTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTNE~ NUMBER DESCRIPTION x 1000) $15 $0 $16 $0 $0 1 94-0803-01 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS $15 $0 $15 $0 $0 II 516 $0 $O , 94-0803-02 LANDSCAPE FOR LANDFILL $16 $4 94-0803-03 MOBILE EQUIPMENT--PICKUP _ A6 0 " 46 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP I I i 1 1 169 7 - - Pg 4118191 i T. I 1995 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY COMMUNITY SERVICES SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL 0803 IPROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-1N NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 95-0603-01 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS $2 $0 $0 $0 $2 95-0803-02 EXPAND LANDFILL $3,500 $0 $0 $0 $3,600 i TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP 3,502 0 0 0 3,502 1 j 1 r 1 i 41181919:13 ply 170 I i i 1 f 1 " D1ViSION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ~Eyl; I 199fi COMMUNITY SERVICES SOLID WASTE - DISPOSAL 0803 _ j ND CURRENT AID-lN I r, BOFUNE~ENUE CONSTR OTHER PROJECTS _TOTAL , CRIPTIO X 1000) NUMBER DES N I - 52 $p $0 96-0803-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPORT EOUI $2 $0 $0 $0 r~[ TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1996 GIP .I Pg --171 _f 4118191 8;54 j 1 3 N AV `4 d I i 1992 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY COMMUNITY SERVICES I ENERGY MANAGEMENT 0257 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 92-0257-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FU $9 $0 $9 $0 $0 92-0257-02 EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS $8 $0 $8 $0 $0 r I TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CIP 17 0 17 0 0 r l_. I I I I L j 1 4115191 9:16 Pq 172 1993 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY f COMMUNITY SERVICES ENERGY MANAGEMENT 0257 ' PROJECTS BOND CURRENT A04 . ~ _.i INUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OZH~ (S X 1000) { 93-0257-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FU $0 SO $b =0 $0 3 C ~1 a TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1403 CIP a 0 6 0 ~J k I`II i I 'I73 2114191 ?:18 Pg- YAY 1 1 1994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY E COMMUNITY SERVICES ENERGY MANAGEMENT 0267 IPROJECTS BOND CURRENT AIDAN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSrR OTHER( (S X 1000) 94-02!',7-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FU i8 30 i8 $0 $0 , ff 1 i f {TOTALS FOR YEAR - 19% CIP B 0 6 0 0 i I 1 1 2/141917:25 p 174 ; mow. i LlYRJYi3 J{ q. ~E313£.. 1998 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY COMMUNITY SERVICES ENERGY MANAGEMENT 0257 PRWECTg BOMD CURRENT AJp-1N NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (i x 1000) 96-0257-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FU $6 $0 ~ s0 $0 96-0257-02 MINIVAN $14 i0 33 $0 =11 .j r 1 TOTALS FOR YEAR -1996 CIP 20 0 9 0 11 f ti l j i r 2/21/9113:11 P 175 J a: 1 Ixtrtktlty T.a+ {54Qg~i1 t, e x"1996 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY _ COMMUNITY SERVICES ENERGY MANAGEMENT 0257 FROJECT8 BOND CURRENT MWN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (S X 1000) 96-0267-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFU S8 $0 $6 40 TOTALS FOR YEAR -1995 CIP 6 0 0 0 0 Iw I I~ { i 1 2/141517:36 P 176 w p CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM k GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN The Capital Improvement budgeting process began with a public hearing held to solicit input from the community, Presentations of requested projects were made to the City's Executive Committee for consideration, Each project was evaluated based on its impact on; 1. Public Safety, Health and Life; 2, Legal Requirement, Liability or Mandate; 3. Quality and Reliability of Current Service Level; 4. Economic Growth and Development; 5, Recreational, Cultural and Aesthetic Value; and 6. Funding Ability. Executive recommendations were approved by the Planning and Zoning Committee for submission to the City Council, The recommended 1991-1996, Five-Year General Government Capital Improvement plan is summarized in the following pages. The summary includes the annual estimated project costs for each of the five ro ram ears with a comparison - to the y by i prior year's estimate. Individual projects are then presented b program year Indicating the department/division responsible for the project and a comparison of current to prior year's estimate. i New guidelines were -implemented during the current planning process incorporating projected annual inflation rates for each project requested for the plan's fifth year (1995.1996). The new approach allows a more comprehensive identification of operation and maintenance costs related to each project and a more accurate estimate of future project costs, Those projects recommended for fifth year funding are proposed for 1995-1996, other projects submitted yet not recommended are included for informational purposes. 1944o "Dedicated to Quality Service" s 177 i ]II ,4 } CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM j CAPITAL BUDGETING CALENDAR STEP 1 - INPUT I February 13, 1991 Public Utilities Board and Planning and Zoning Commission hold a public hearing to receive input from community regarding Capital Improvement Program, February 18, 1991 Begin support staff training in use of budget templates. February 27, 1991 Staff capital budget kickoff, March 27, 1991 Capital Improvement Program requests due in Budget Of fire for review and analysis. STEP 2 - CONSOLIDATION AND MANAGEMENT REVIEW , April 19, 1991 General Government Capital Improvement requests are presented to Executive Committee for consideration. April 22, 1991 Executive Committee reviews General Government requests formulating recommendation to be forwarded to Planning and Zoning commission. STEP 3 - CONSIDERATION/ADOPTION February 19, 1991 City Council briefing on Capital Improvement Program budgeting process. March 27, 1991 Public Utilities Board receives preliminary working draft of Utilities Capital Improvement Plan, April 10, 1991 Public Utilities Board holds a work session to review Utilities Capital Improvement Plan. i 19440 "Dedicated to Qualo Service" 178 ,aY.Y4d'> )t P+Y'dfk5[ry~g~7{1 a ,7 A CAPITAL l APROVEMENT PROGRAM STEP 3 - CONSIDERATION/ADOPTION Continued utilities Board Public Capital May 15, 1991 discusses utilities improvement Plan. Planning and zoning commission May 22, 1981 discusses the Capital Improvement Program, Public Utilities Board's final May 29, 1991 recommendation of Capital Improvement Plan. Planning zoning Commission June 12, 1991 holds a special meeting c andaconsid.ers a recommendation. Recommended five-year reseital nted ` July 2, 1991 Improvement Program council for to city j - consideration, i City council adopts capital budget (first year of Capital 3 f September 17, 1991 improvement ram' along with } f,'] w, operating budget, I i 19aao "Dedicated to Duality Service' 74 E i h4Yti:tf ~+Ir 9PNT <i i I i I f' I I I D l ; I E 180 1 1#ti+PGwb : 1f-ANF-0t 1991.,,-98 CAPIT/IL NPROYEMENr pL,AIV I SUMMARY OF PROPOSED VS PRIOR YEJIR ~r E r+wart r~a+'. AMM eoNrv acrroN Y&W 1991-92 9G~6,D00 2,Aes T7s t, 49, XV (MM 1992^93 6x000 i,TTRrer: AM" 247,216 N 1993-94 621,000 000 9,107,000 640,000 1994-96 M,000 2,eoleoo s,7710nO 8>d4av 199-98 0 0 X807,000 9 807,000 t 2,?78,000 9,190,122 MW OW 6, 679 • 3om~ ahwf SW "nNoW*M troy beWcWM ed by 1ntMwd wntrw on 198:5' Aid Ww f9 6MIdMCOO li i I r i 181 i 1 I i, 1991-96 CAPITAL IMP ORp V, ENT PLAN PROPOSED VS PRIOR YEAR x0- r ~ FglOKYF~iR VARiA1VC~ BUDaEr gt/ OCiE► AFTBi AFM PROP0.SED DMSKOV AgQ1wr 6r<F9t7 OFFS" lNMAW -AR DEPARTMENt M#AMW 170,100 Srs,aoo ,e°° 1991-92 ENGINEERING o010-27 oMM NornNaHAY foo,ao0 (1,o7b,aool UNMawTYD"(i-w TO Et , 1,175,000 6WINEPVNO 0010-20 107,3137 107,000 (337) PLANNING 0015-03 TEASLEYLAMSCAPINQ 292,000 22,000 DRAINAGE OAfO-if YNILL&ONQRIDQEDIWNAQE• 270,000 750,0019 801.000 DRAINAGE OB10 AZ coovEHCREEK CHANNEL PHASE l 99,E DRAINAGE 0810 Q3 PECAN CAEEKCHANNEL NAPA0VMENT 2b0,~ 319,000 0 12,000 12,000 AIRPORT 0019-01 LAND MOUI&ITpNIRUNWAYEXTENe1DN 125, OW 125,000 AIRPORT 001942 ONE THOUS FT RUNWAY EXT 9,012,737 2,302,000 0,7371 E i 1I t t ~ i 3 i ~ 1e2 i i ~ F All I 1991-96 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN st PROPOSED VS PRIM YEAR NE/ NEr I P1MwYI-, cI suDOE1 euDC+~r Vim' f PROPOSE D D(VkWM pw4Acr "F" YEAR a 0,10 711f~M Nis PR0.tECTNAM!" Q~FB$15 C>f3` AM, 53,000 4,215 i 1992-99 jWlNE6VN0 001041 uuaAN MILLER bpEwALI( 000 107,000 71000 EWINEMW 001002 YnuoWw00D re~ CONTROL E 100, ALS 211,000 16,000 EWINEEMW 0010-01 INTER8EDT10N813NALe 225,000 LANE$ 80,000 loslo00 15,000 ENOINEEJ9 W 001" TURN $0,000 32,000 2,000 EHplNEEA1NQ 0010-06 p®EETRi/4451(iNAL6 1.000 . DRAINAGE 0810.0} PECAN cREEKDOwNTOwN uAS rERPLA 51,000 62,000 1001000 1$8,000 39,000 DRAINAGE x810.01 AVENUEO 128,000 1381000 10,000 I j DRAINAGE 0810-05 WILBOO-MORSE-ALOC"EAAREA ,808,000 109,000 fF gWVNAQE o81a06 COOPER CAK DRAIN PHASE n 500,015V i DRAINAGE 0810-07 pEcANORKDRAIN AGENEARR08ERT90 600,000 007,000 107,000 1,772,765 2,002,000 309,215 I ~ I I f, II 183 I~ I I ,y. ti RGJUrt-91 1991-98 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROPQSED VS PRIOR YEAR PFWIR YEAR SUMET r VAWKICIF AF/lea AMM.' wom r pRp(IEGTNAAtE OFIB Ow g PROP'DSM YEAR MPAR A RT tVRN LANES fOQ000 121,000 ?i,00r7 1993-94 ENGINEERING 0010-13 50,000 N1B.000 ,uoo 9a9,oa4 ENGINEERING 0010-i4 srREi7TCOH~n~ 460,000 921,000 171,000 ENGINEERING 0010-28 Fr WORTH DR PAUDR" (PHASE n • 122,000 22,000 SMVALK&VIKEWAYS 100,000 ENGINEt7gfNG 0010-15 112,000 197,000 25,000. EMGJNFER/N0 0010-16 AveHUe S PAVIHn (tHeTEAOOP OOSEPO 2,85,000 219 ox 48,000 EWiNESVN0 0010-17 SIGNALS 1,385,004 395,000 DRAINAGE 0810-08 PECANGREEK(WILEYTOW~OODRO" f,~,000 600,000 643,000 143,000 , DRAINAGE 0910-10 COCPERORKPHAWIII 2,997,000 3,930,000 93,3,000 1 i i t r 1 i 184 I XS, , MIX] Will t 1991-96 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT P1. AN PROPOSED VS PRIOR YEAR Nor Irr Pam WAR 1 Mwow j BlalW OUCla r YARLAINC AMP -ARM, ppgRpSE!) lalY/SrLiA1/ PALVECI MVJECrAfAAfB YW 0EPAMMENT NU 0ER 1994-95 ENGINEER11M0 0010-21 ARTERIAL TURN LANES 100,000 1I R 000 m 000 ENGINEERINO 0010.22 g1HEETCONSTRLgT10WRE00NST 250,000 =ox MOOD ENGINEMNO 0010-41 WESTWAY PAVING 2wwo x1,xo 061M 17 ENGINEERINO WA LOOP211111 12,6100 0 0216M ENGINEERING 0010-00 FT WORTH OR PAVADFWN (PHASE IQ • 5w,000 699" 1m,0 PLANNING 0015-02 Low, swLANOSOAPING 300,000 2n19,0100 (51,000) PLANNING 0015-08 LANDBOAPE FT WORTH OR 0 391000 319,000 , ~r . 113971600 117w,000 3#01400 f ' f { 't _i i 185 i Y6F'u q+; ~.v .rytu'~.a i 210JIM►-91 1991--96 CAPiTA4 IMPROVEMENT P N r+1~r +Ver WMA pROPOSED VS PRIOR YEAR OUDW BU yam: I AFTER AFTBi ( PROJEG7 OFFSM Oh E7g Pf PROPOSEp" NUAAWR , MA YEAR DW 0 !!$000 !17,000 AIAPOV?r 001904 OVERLAY RUNWAY 1Tf~6 0 M 1-98 AIRPORT 00 f 9-06 aeAl COAT TxY a PAINT ANN 0 26,000 3zzaoo ENCi1N> ERlNO OOf0 60 MIGG eTCONSTRUanOWRE~NbiRWT 0 125000 1219,000 EA1CalNEERlNA 0010-32 BIOEWALKCONSrauoTpN 0 130,000 130,000 EAK4INEERINQ 0010-63 TURN LANES FOR ARTENAI'S 0 bop 000 600,000 Y w Nf31NEEAlNQ 0070-68 CCIIIN ST PAVING AND DRAIN PHASE 1 0 1,884,000 1,684,000 ' PAWS A REO 0060"01 POOL RENOVATKkuE~aANewH 0 &W, 000 PARKS 6 REC 0063`02 PARK RENOVATION 0 60,Og0 60,000 PLANAUNO 0016-01 CITYFARKWATERFACILITYSTUDY 0 120,000 120,000 0010-51 INTERSECTION CONTROL SIGNALS EWJNEEAWG _ 0 ,4,607,0100 3,607,000 1 1 k.. L. a j 186 1 C 1 1991-96 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN IN-jun-of w° LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED FOR FIFTH YEAR (1996-96) L GROM OPERA rOrAL NET NET N mauwva PI#WEOr PmwEOr GAPTTAL AWNT OR068 OAPfTAL 044MW.An E Do" NUMBER NAME Cosr COST COST OOar rOrAL RECOMMENDED PROJECTS FOR 1996-96; I AIRPORT 0010-04 OVERLAY RUNWAY 17k16 11176,000 t,000 111,000 117,000 117,000 2 AIRPORT 0010-06 SEAL COAT TXYAAPAONfPA$NTT 201,000 1,000 27,000 20,000 143,000 I J ENGINEERING 0010-60 MISC$TCONSTALOTWWRECONST 322,000 0 322,000 322,000 486,000 4 ENGINEERING 001" SIMFWALKCONBTRUOTION 128,000 2,000 130,000 128,000 603,000 5 ENGINEERING 610473 TURN LANES FOR ARTI.WAL8 130,000 0 180,000 1w,000. 722,000 6 ENGINEERING 0010-0 COLLINSSTPAYADRAINPHASE 1 600,000 0 600,000 600,000 1,223,000 7 PARKS ARED 0000-01 POOL RENOVATKONOWANS!" 1,884,000 00,000 1."4,000 1,"4,06 8,107,000 6 PARKS 8 AEG 0001-02 PARK RENOVATION 330.00 36,000 386,000 330,000 3,437,000 9 PLANNING 0016-01 PECAN CRK WATER PARK MOTH PLN 60,000 0 50,000 60,000 31417,000 j 10 ENGINEERING 001041 INTERSECTION CONTROL SIGNALS 120,000 0 120,000 120,000 3,007,000 I ; OTHER PROJECTS SUBMI7TEDFOR 1606-00: II ENGINEERINQ 0010-61 INTERSECTION CONTROL614NALS 182,06 2,000 194,000 182,000 3,7",000 12 ENGINCERING 0010-64 CORBIN RO BRIDGE 966,000 2,000 957,000 866,000 4,744,000 IJ ENGINEERING 0010-66 BERNARD 8T PAVING AND DRAINAGE 1,382,000 0 1,392,000 1,302,000 0,136,000 ;i 14 ENGINEERING 0010-66 WILLOWWOOD PAVING AND DFW NAGE 2,616,000 0 2,646,000 2,846,000 0,781,040 1`6 ENGINEERING 0010-6T MYRTLE 8T PAVING AND DRAINAGE 611,000 0 61;4,000 618,000 91300,000 16 ENGINEERING 0010-U COLLINST PAY AVODRAIN PH 11 867,000 0 067.000 667,000 10,060,000 f7 ENGINEERING 0010-09 MAPLE S'TPAY)"ANDDRAINAGE 603.00 0 683,000 603,000 10,839,06. I/ ENGINEERING 001040 KI NO 9 ROW PAVI NO AND DRAINAGE 2,033,000 0 2,033,000 2,033,000 12,672,000 IS ENGINEERING 0010-01 EAST WINDSOR DR PAY AND DRAIN 11;".00 0 070,000 870,000 13,342,000 20 ENGINEERING 0010-02 WEST WINDSOR OR PAY AND DRAIN 2,"01000 0 2,960,000 2,910,06 10,372,000 1 2f ENGINEERING 0010-0 8 RONNIE SRAE PAY AND DRAINAGE 2,004,000 0 2,08. 10. 2,064,000 16,386,000 22 ENGINEERING 0010.64 MAYHILL RO PAVB DRAIN PH 1 4,420,000 0 4,420,000 4,426,000 22,612,000 PJ ENGINEERING 0010-0 MAYHILL RO PAY6 DRAIN PH 11 3,330,000 0 31332,000 0,339000 26,161,000 24 ENGINEERING 0010-06 MAYHILL RD PAV6 DRAIN PH III 2,424,000 0 2,424,000 2,424,000 26,676,000 26 ENGINEERING 0010-47 MA3CHBRCHADPHASE 4 2,916,000 0 2,910,000 2,610,000 31,401,000 1 16 ENGINEERING 0010-72 RINEY RD PAVING AND DRAINAGE 224,000 0 224,000 224,000 31,716,000 27 ENGINEERING 0010-73 MASO H BACH AD PHASE 1 736,000 0 736,000 736,000 32,460,000 26 ENGINEERING 0010.74 MASCH BACH RD PHASE 2 1,916,000 0 1.015.00 1,016,000 34,306,000 20 ENGINEERING 0010-T6 MASCHBRCHADPHASE 3 113021000 0 1,362,000 1,362,000 36,727,000 30 ENGINEERING 0010-76 8EDENTONSIDEWALKS 164,000 0 104,000 164,000 36,611,000 JI DRAINAGE 001048 PECAN ORK(ALONQUNIVERISITY) 322,000 0 322,000 322,000 30,10,000 f 32 DRAINAGE 0610-12 SEQUOIA PARK DRAINAGE 1,041,000 0 1,041,000 1,041,000 37,184,06 33 DRAINAGE 0110-13 THUNDERBIRD DRAINAGE 04,000 0 SON 84,000 37,276.000 34 DRAINAGE 0010-14 DAN I ELWFT WORTH 09 DRAINAGE 330,000 0 390,000 330,000 37,86,000 35 AIRPORT 0010-06 CONSTFKIOT N HOLDING APRON 110,000 11000 12,000 11,600 37,619,000 30 AIRPORT 0019-07 LAND ACQ FOR 1600 114661000 0 141,000 141,000 37,700,000 07 AIRPORT 001941 OONR'TRUOT N RUNWAY IWO 21316,000 0 233,000 233,000. $7,90.00 36 AIRPORT 0019-09 I= JET PARKING APRON 300,000 0 30,000 30,000 00,023,000 J9 AIRPORT 0016-10 COMMERCIAL SEAN APRON 243,000 0 .14,000 24,000 31,047,000 40 AIRPORT 0019.11 NEW FUEL STORAGE FACILITY 11060,000 6,000 110,000 106,000 31,162,000 41 LIBRARY 0070.01 DENTONPUBLIC LAAARYBRANCH 1,642.00 306,000 1,847,000 1,649.00 30,664,000 42 LIBRARY 0070-02 ON-LINE CATELOG PHASE2 311,000 0 311,000 311.00 40,006,000 43 LIBRARY 0070-03 PLAN 2 LIBRARY BRANCH 3,784,000 321,000 4,100,000 3,704,06 43,740,000 44 PLANNING 001644 LANDSCAPE 2" AND MCKINNEY ST 104,000 13,000 96,000 62,000 43,871,000 46 PLANNING 0016.67 UNIVERSITY 00LANDBCAPINO 093.00 73,000 390,000 317,000 44,1114,000 40 PARKS AREO 0063-01 PAAKS RENOVATION PROJECT 1,320,000 0 1,320,000 1,320,000 46,66,094 47 PARKS 8 RED 0002-01 NEW ROOFS 76,000 0 700,000 708,000 46,214,000 44 PARKS ARED 0002-00 kVACOOMPUYER00WROLS 236,000 0 236,000 236,000 48,440,000 49 FIRE 0060-01 FIRE-0OLICECOMPUTER SYSTEM 1,676,000 0 1,876,000 1,676,06 46,024,06 60 FIRE 660.02 OUTDOOR WAANWe SYSTEM 20.000 6.000 206;000 240,000 40,313,000 61 FIRE 0060-03 RELOOATEACOMBI4E8116813 21160.06 0 2,180,06 2,160,000 60,463,000 62 FIRE 0060.04 AMUILDST4-PREM11'SIrF .663,000. 0 940,000 x,000 6t,31",000 W FIRE 060-06 RENOVATE ST2 346,000 0 346,06 348,06 61,071,06 54 FIRE 06046 FIRE TRAINING COMR 2,400,000 72,000 2,472,000 2,400,000 61,07f,000 66 FIRE 660-07 PILOT KHOO FIRE 9TATION 1,260,000 1,306,000 2,660,06 1,260,60 66,321,000 80 FIRE 0060-08 MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FIRE STATION 1,250,00 1.125,000 2".00 .1,260,06 66,671,600 67 FIRE 0060.08 LAKEVIEW FIRE STATION 1,260,06 1,308,06 2,666,06 1,260,400 67,021,06 84 FIRE 0060-10 BOUTHNEW FIRE STATION 11260,06 1,36,000 2,668,06 11260,06. 60,071,000 187 L%I151N'L' i 1991-96 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED FOR FIFTH YEAR (1486-98) antra ?OW lVEr rdeT OWAL I/AINr "Wom pAP!►AL 0444ILA N AEOU PAOJEOt r r OOdr con Ow iToro4 ' k E AiIMISER r AUTHORIZED PROJECTS PENDING BUT NOT PROPOSED FOR 1991-98 DUE TO FUNDING CONSTRAINTS; 410,411,000 W PARI(S6RE6 WA WMATIONOENTERS 2,100,000 W POLICE00OURT WA LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER 100000 bS,l71,000 _ 11 ENOINEERING WA UNIVMWV DRIVE CONSTRUCTION 0.00 S4 271,000 MAN e2 LIBRARY WA LISRARY EXPANSION i f~ r. i r i I 188 f H 1991-96 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED S~~ _ _ - - " (ALL YEAR QRAR4 OPER a TOTAL NET REQUI:37 W PAWEOr PROJECT CAPRAL MAWT omm CAPITAL DEPT NUNBER NAME COST COST COST COST PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1981-92: ist ENGINEERING 0010-27 NOTTINGHAM PAVING AND DRAINAGE 6~;0 0 6n1~ 6~ ~ ENGINEERING 0010-20 UNIVERSITY DR (1-36 Tk) ELM) 11 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1992-93: 0 000 59,000 ENGINEERING 0010-01 LILLIAN MILLER SIDEWALKS ENGINEERING 0010-02 WILLOWWOOD BIKEWAYISIDEWALHS 107,000 0 1070000 107,000 ENGINEERING 0010-04 INTERSECTION CONTROL SIGNALS 241,000 1,000 242,000 241,000 000 ENGINEERING 0010.06 TURN LANES FOR ARTERIALS 105,000 00 1,0066, t~ ~ ENGINEERING 0010-d8 PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS 32oO ,o PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1983-94: 121,000 0 121,000 121,004 ENGINEERING 0010-13 ARTERIAL TURN LANES 808,000 0 t i ENGINEERING W10-14 `STREET RECONSTRUCTION sm;ooo 60,000 ENGINEERING 0010-28 FT WORTH DR PAVING AND DRAIN 621,000 0 621,000 6211,00D ~ 0 22,040 ~ j ENGINEERING 0010-16 SIDEWAL.KSMIKEWAYS 000 137,000 1 ENGINEERING 0010-16 AVENUE B PAVING 122 285,00 E 0 0 ~ 137,000 289,000 ENGINEERING, 0010-17 TRAFFIC SIGNALS : PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1894-95. 128,000 0 128,000 128,000 ENGINEERING 0010-21 ARTERIAL TURN LANES 0 ~r~ 322,000 ENGINEERING 0010-22 STREET RECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING 0010-23 WESTWAY PAVING ANU DRAINAGE 301,000 00 3001, ENGINEERING 0010-03 FT WORTH DR (1-96 TO COLLINS) 899,000 _ j f rf j r i i t ~ r rs-Jun-sr 1991-96 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED {AI-L Y£ARS~ GRUSSV OPER 4~ TOTAL NET CAKAL MAINT QR a" CAPfrAL ~ECr REGX/ES71NG PAWECT NAME COST COSr C03r --COST L1EPT NAURER PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1995-96: 0 $22,000 ENGINEERING 0010-so MISC ST CONSTRUCTIONIRECONST t22s~ 0 120,000 120,000 ENGINEERING 0010-51 INTERSECTION CONTROL SIGNALS 120f~ 2 0 120'0 1 28,000 0 130,000 130,000 ENGINEERING 0010-52 31DEWA X CONSTRUCTION 120 000 ,000 ENGINEERING 0010-63 TURN LANES FOR ARTERIALS 0 600,000. 600,000 ENGINEERING 0010-68 COLLINS ST PAY & DRAIN PHASE 1 600,000 OTHER PROJECTS SUBMITTED; 184,000 162,000 ENGINEERING 0010-51 INTERSECTION CONTROL SIGNALS 9~ ~ 2 0000 00 157,000 182,000 ENGINEERING 0010-64 CORBIN RD BRIDGE - 0 1,392,000 1,392,000 c ENGINEERING 0010-55 BERNARD ST PAVING AND DRAINAGE 1,392,000 0 2 305 000 2,646,000 ° ENGINEERING 0010-56 WILLOWWOOD PAVING AND DRAINAGE" 2,646,000 0 818,000 857,000 618,000 ENGINEERING 0010-67 MYRTLE ST PAVING AND DRAINAGE 618,000 0 667,E ENGINEERING 0010-68 COLLIN ST PAV AND DRAIN PH II 867,E 0 663,000 683,000 1 ENGINEERING 0010-61 MAPLE ST PAVING AND DRAINAGE N3.~ 0 2,033,000 2399,000: ! ENGINEERING 0010-80 KING$ ROW PAVING AND DRAINAGE 2,033 000 0 670,000 870,000 ENGINEERING 0010-61 EAST WINDSOR DR PAu AN D DRAIN 2,980,000 0 2,980,DOd 2,980`000 ENGINEERING 0010-62 WEST WINDSOR DR F,% 0 2,083,000 2,084300 ENGINEERING 0010-63 S BONNIE BRAE PAV AND DRAINAGE 2,~,~ 0 A+ 000 2,064,000 1 ENGINEERING 0010-64 MMAYHILL RD PAV & DRAIN PH 1 3 ~ 000 0 3,336,000 3,339,000 ENGINEERING 0010-65 MAYHILL RD PAV & DRAIN PH 11 2,324,000 0 2,424,000 2,474,000 ENGINEERING 0010-86 MAYHLLI.. RD PAV & DRAIN PH III 2,118,000 0 2,916,000 2'~4A~ ENGINEERING 0010-87 MASCH BRCH RD PHASE b 224,000 0 224, 736,000 ENGINEERING0070-72 RINEY RD PAVING AND DRAINAGE 7~ ~ 0 735,000 ENGINEERING 0010-73 MASCH BRCH RD PHASE 1 1 116,000 0 1,116,000 1,9/6,000 ENGINEERING 001074 MASCH BRCH RD PHASE 2 1 382,000 0 1,362,000 1,362,000 ENGINEERING 0010-75 MASCH BRCH RD PHASE 3 104 ,000 0 164,000 104,004 ENGINEERING 0010-76 S E DENTON SIDEWALKS 'I c 1 i V i k j I r j PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1991-1992 M.I lAi All t 27-Mar-91 DATE CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT p: 0010-27 1992 PROJECT TITLE: NOTTINGHAM PAYING AND DRAINAGE Month Year TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $513 0 Thousand Thousand EST START DATE: JAN 1992 + 1992 TTL EST 1st PEAR U&C COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: SEPT TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: I. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THIS PROJECT IIS`O CONSTRUCT PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS FOR NOTTINGHAM BETWEEN US 38 A I[. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: SAFETROUTEGFROM NE DENTONATOADOWNTOWNTHE TRAFFIC THE CONTO380VPROVIDESNOTTINGHAM SIGNAL A A Post-CoMpletion ~ III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): co 1992 _ SEPT Est Capital Est 1st Yr Est Annual Project 0 & N OperlMaint Oper/Maim Curr $ Intl $ Curr $ Intl CAPITAL Expenditure of Curr $ Intl $ Total COST COST $ _ i ' $0 $ $0 -O% Personal Serv: $0 $0 $O 0 Services: 0 0% i Supplies: 0 0 0 Land/ROW: 0 0 Construction: 475 513 IOOX Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 p% ; Services: 0 0 p 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 OX ( Oth It XXXXXXX O 0 0 0 0th Equipment: XXXXXXX 0 0 O% 0th 2: XXXXXXX ' $0 $0 SO $0 - , _ TOTAL (Thous): $475 $513 100% TOTAL (Thous): r r proof 0 IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): 106X % YR TTL: 1'R 1: 1992 17R TOTAL: $513 0 ;FEB: 13 {MAR: APR: 50 0 :Nov: 0 ;AEC: 0 IJAN: 90 ;SEP: 40 OCT: 50 MAY: 90 )JUN: 90 (JUL: 90 ,AUG: , X YR TTL: Gx YR TOTAL: $0 YR 2. 1993 G 0 ;JAN: 0 ;FEB: 0 ;MAR: OCT. 0 ;NOV: U ,DEC: 0 (AUG: 0 (SEP: 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 {JUN: 0 iJUL: , --'I'- YR R TOTAL: y$0 3: 1994 0 :FEB: 0 ;MAR: OCR: 0 ;NOV: X YR TTL: 0 ,DEC: 0 .JAN: p ;SEP: 0 APR: 0 {MAY: 0 iJUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 (AUG: 0 , i i~._-----••---' { - proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Auth & Unauth &; ;SOURCE: XXXXXXXX{ ' ' Certificate ; Operating Aid In ; TOTAL Sold ,Unsold Unsold , YEAR , ~ C So , yR GO Bond ;GO Bond GO Bond ;of Obligation! Revenue oast Grant $0 so 199-- 2~$0 I~ $513 r $0 , 0 0 { 0 0{ 0, 0; 0 p( 0 1993 0 0 i 0 i 0 $0 $0 i $513 $513 `$0 , $0 0 TTLS; - $0 , - _-'-=-easn_=e0 =-'-z===s»_»~=_==_~= proof a r w NOTE; -ATTACH SITE MAP rIF'PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 192 i rM1 f A ON ~ ~ ~ ! A ~OYAM K^-'A-'7 g P W Si YE OAIE AOAO nNn t+~rraA .M L RI TR AIN jl, Son f , °rfg \ i t~/ /~JJ'~~( E \ \ X111 1! ~ L ,•i V ~ ~ I~ `r f~ *<< I~L Soy-PCB i it L q\ t WffS0 0106 ~I IAOR ago f ` •l-z~~~ ~ ° ' ii ~ rm ~ln TAT-E_~_\ Y } ~ . r J 1 I ~iI~~ oP c~s~ JI`j tt r~ a0p0 P• BAR RION _ on U A4 MIN a R1 i / 1(^ AUORA ' , ~ ~1 rvaN N. y eas ~t ~ ! II`I g ~gl~ a OGA ! ~ ry ; r ©d ~I f~w~ PATS PI, ' I~ PAI Y ¢ PAISLEY .4 j f T R i I ~I AOR i0 _ _'"r'_'ME f. M, 126 p~ I e~MC KNNEY r 'nil 8 ■ I zt R \ ~ ~gcK 193 rn. 'ku\r ta.-If,c..y r~ !1 „ i 09-Apr-91 DATE CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT DETAIL *##*****#******#******##********t#*#*******#*****#*#**##*###PROJFC1'#**##**0010-200*YE1995 PROJECT TITGF.: UNIVERSITY DR BTWN 135 & 377 Month Year $0 Thousand Month TTL EST CAPITAL COST; 0 Thousand EST START DATE: AUG 1996 TTL EST 1st Y AR OAM COSTt 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: JAN TTI, EST ANNUAL 001 COST: 1, BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: }IONIES FOR THIS PROJECT WERE TO BE USED AS THE CITY'S SHARE OF A STATE HWY PROJECT, THE STATE NO LONGER REQUIRES SHARED FUNDING FROM CITIES, i II, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: XXXXXXX\XXXXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXSXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXAXXrIXXXXX\KX!I1XXS\xxxxxXXXXXXXXXXaXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Post-Completion 111, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand(: JAN 1996 Est Capital , Est Ist Yr Est Annual Project 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint CAPITAL Expenditure % of i COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr $ Infl S COST Curr $ [nf1 $ Total - r ---p SO _ ERR Personal Serv; 80 SO $0 $0 Services 0 ERR i Supplles: 0 Land/ROW: 0 Maintenance: 0 0 0 1 Construction: 0 0 ERR . 0 0 0 0 0 0 ERR ; Services: 0 0 0 0thEqui1:pment; XXXXXXX 0 0 ERR i 0th 1; XXXXXXX 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0th 2; XXXXXX% 0 0 ERR S 0 $0 $0 $0 I TOTAL (Thous): $0 $0 ERR i TOTAL (Thous)°__= proof 0 ~J - IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS {Dollars to Nearest Thousand): TOTAL: SO YR TTL: ERR , YR 11____-1995 OCR: 0 (NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ',JAN: 0 ',FEB; 0 ',MAR: 0 0 .MAY; 0 ldUN; 0 IJUh: 0 ;AUG: O ;cSEP: 0 APR : , ' _ , , _ _ YR 7t y1996 YR TOTAL; 80 X YR TTI: ERR OCT; 0 ',ROY' 0 ;MAR: 0 ' 0 iDEC: 0 (JAN; 0 ~FEB: 0 iSEP: 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 JUN: 0 (JUL: 0 !AUG: - - _ ERR YR YR-3: --1997 1'R TOTAL $0 TTL: ; 0 APR: 0 0 i~NOVMAYI: 0 ,DEC: 0(JAN: 0 :FEB: 0 0 i MAR: OCT: 0 ;JUN; 0 :JUL; 0 AUG: 0 f proof r V, FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): ;Ruth & Unuuth &; ;SOURCE: XXXXXXXXI YEAR Sol(] ;Unsold Unsold I Certificate operating i Aid in TOTAL ; YR GO Bond ;GO Bond GO Bond !of Obligation; Revenue Const Grant ~ T _ SO $0 $0 1995 ^SO ; SO SO S0 1 0! 0 0 i 7 1996 0 0 0' 0! 0; 0 0 0 1991 _ - 0 80 $0 ~ SO $ 0 proof 0 TTLSi SO $0 30 _ NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES194NDt ROWt OR CONSTRUCTION. 1 ,rl fi } io vi u 1 41,14 rJ } 1 r V ,tom S~ • \ r W In fl t.'~ I ! i N $ :..1 [of+ V 5`I 1 t 1\... V 1 it I A 41 ..,,'I . l rl 11 . 4f I• I - _.1,, l I nvi ~ r 1 ~ r f 1 . 7opy + - - T n 1 1 1 ( f I Q, ~ 1 J ' I 7 14 w- I {j • ,q`{ I'fi. Sr..~ (f I 4IYi64} (1l of ~ ~ ~ I,~I ` i l 14~J//~// i~ HAR IIEE t ANN b ' qOP 48,06f e e., 31 i I o l_ ` ~ n M I f ~ I +It~~~ r~ ~ OS r - 26% 4,3 OAC Cry > . I AOP ' 41 F l0 1 Al I . / 1426 , I r VLLr 1 , Y f,1U 1'1• I I,~`~ I Al 'Or. Sbt SHADY SH E ( r~ ~~ri5~ \ ~'.1 I „ter I IM~r eis -XI + +870 ' } ti i , ( { J1 - i a i I _ J J' E i 1 j: } 146 i A G r. 0r]FS9 4 kx4 tiM$ i' I i a I } PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1992-1993 I' r .~a 197 d I t 1 I I t CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 03-Apr-91 DATE [ PROJECT DETAIL i ************»*************************************************************ORGN-NO*YEAR* PROJECT TITLE: LILLIAN MILLER SIDFWALKS PROJECT A: QOSO-gl 1992 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $53 Thousand Month Year TTL EST IaL YEAR 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: APR 1992 TTL EST ANNrkA, 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: JAN 1993 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 4'CONCRETE SIDEWALK ALONG WEST SIDE OF LILLIAN KILLER FROM I1i35E TO TEASLEY LAVE ( Il. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: TO YROVIUE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM SOUTHRIDGE SUBDIVISION TO MAJOR RETAII, AREA AT IH 35 E AND LOOP 288 i 1I1. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital JAN 1993 _ Project i Est 1st Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of ; 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Infl $ Total ; COST Curr $ Intl $ Curr S Intl $ Services: Ju $5 $5 u 10% ; Personal Serv: $0 ~$0 SO $0 Land/ROW: 0 0 0% ; Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 44 48 90% ; Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 0% Service:: 0 0 0 0 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; oth l: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 Oth 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous): $49 $63 100% TOTAL (Thous): $0 ~$0 $0 ` $0 proof 0 IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand)*, 1'R 1992 1'R TOTAL: $16 Y % YR TTL: 30% OCT: 0 Nov: 0 )DEC: 0 !JAN: 0 !FEB: 0 :MAR: 0 APR: 2 ;MAY: 3 ;JUN: 0 :JUL: 0 :AUG: 3 ;ISEP: 8 1.8 2: 1993 1'R TOTAL: $37 X YR TTL: 70% f OCT: 8 :NOV: 8 iDEG: 8 :JAN: 8 :FEB: 5 iMAR: 0 I 0 APR: 0 )MAY: 0 :JUN: 0 :JUL: 0 :AUG: 0 :SEP: 1'R 3: 1994 YR TOTAL: $0 X 1'R TTL: 0% OCT: 0 :NOV, 0 :DEC: 0 :JAN: 0 :FEB: 0 :MAR: 0 APR: 0 :MAY: 0 :JUN! 0 ;JUL: 0 :AUG: 0 !SEP: 0 proof 0 Y ; V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): ;Ruth & Unauth :SOURCE: XXXXXXX%: Sold ;Unsold Unsold : Certificate Operatine, : Aid in : YEAR YR GO Bond :GO Bond GO Bond ;of Obligation: Revenue ; Const Grant TOTAL I ~ ' : -1992 s0 1 ~ $16 T $0 1 $0 s0 : $0 $0 $16 1993 0: 37 0 0: 0 0 0 37 1994 0, 0 0: 0, 0: 0 0 1) I , I TTLS: so ; $53 $0 : $o $o $0 so : a5 3 ----=====a===c=== proof 0,48 VOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. t 198 r8 N i+.u+,a j VA 1--7/7 000 r /yam fad Ak, 1 1 ,4 lam- ~ ' ~ ino 1 I \ 44 1 (mow .Y+ ` S. 199 4Gf0•~I 1''.~\ I 1 fA, ~t ♦ GGG r CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 03-A,~-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL *~*************************************************************************ORGN-NO*YEAR* PROJECT TITLE: WILLOWWOOD BIKEWAYW DEWALKS PROJECT k: 9010-02 1992 TTI. EST CAPITAL COST: $107 Thousand Month Year TTL EST 1st YEAR O&M COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: AUG 1992 TTI. EST ANNUAL O&X COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: JAN 1993 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: COSSTRUCT A 3' SIDEWALK AND BIKEPATH ALONG WILLOWWOOD STREET (SOUTH SIDE) FROM W'YSTERIA TO McCORMICI\ 11, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/ PURPOSE: PROVIDE SAFE AREAS FOR PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS ALONG WILLOWWOOD ST. INCLUDING SCHOOL ROUTE TO BORMAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL III. PROJECT BUDGET (Do;.lars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital JAN 1993 Project ; Est~lst Yv Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure of ; 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Inf1 $ Total ; COST Curr $ Intl $ Curr $ Intl $ - Services: - $7 ^$7 - 7% ; Personal Serv: $0 $0 $0 $0 r- i Land/ROW: 0 0 0% i Supplies: 0 0 0 0 i..' Construction: 90 97 90% Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 0% Services: 0 0 0 0 0th 1: TESTING 3 3 3% ; 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 f 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous): $100 $107 100% TOTAL (ThouB): $0 $0 $0 $O `proof ------•-0- r. IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR 1: 1992 ----YR TOTAL: $36~ % YR TTL: 34% OCT: 0 ;Nov: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 ;FEB: O IMAR: 0 APR: 2 ;MAY: 2 ;JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 ,AUG: 16 ~SEP: 16 Y'R 2: 1993 YR TOTAL: _ $71 % YR TTL: 66% OCT: 16 (NOV: 16 iDEC: 16 ;JAN: 19 ,FEB: 5 ,MAR: 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 ;SEP: 9 YR 3: 1994 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% OCT: 0 (Nov: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN; 0 {FEB: 0 ;MAR: 0 .aPR: 0 ;MAT': 0 ;JUN: 0 ;JULt 0 !AUG't 0 ;SEP: 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Auth & Unauth iSOURCE: XXXXXXXX, Sold !Unsold Unsold Certificate Operating Aid in TYEAR OTAL YR GO Bond ;GO Bond GO Bond ;of Obligation; Revenue ; Coast Grant , M r r_ { 1992 $0 ~ $0 $36 ; SO ; $0 ~ $0 $0 ; 836 1393 O i 0 71 , 0 0, 0 0 i 1 0 19 91 0; U 0 0 0, 0 0, proof -0.,14 TTLS r=_- O ----$o= _=$107 _-~--=-==SO ==50 i $0 SO ; S107 NOTE: -.ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 200 i : All si~yslty.A, r~ c ~ /'17L 1 ti i _ v 7 If M , + 44 6lllo i 1 it ,-ei~l..-~-'1I I 1i a I ✓l i r 01, I 1 l / ! ~ l ~ i ' ~ ~d I ' i NNNNNNNN, 111 NNNNN- 20 t14a lY 1 p'•a I 1 i ' li\!14'+•6 03-Apr-91 DATE CITY' OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN I 'k PROJECT DETAIL l PROJECT ri; 0010-0.1 1992 i xx*********************INTERSECTIO`1*CONTROL *SIGNALS *x***x***#**************OMonth D*IEYear PROJECT TITLE: $221 Thousand EST START DATE; FEB 1992 TTL EST CAPITAL COST; 1 Thousand DEC 1993 TTL EST lst YE1R O&M COST: 1 Thousand EST COMPL DATE; 1TI, EST ANNUAL ONM COST: i xx***xx*xxx**xxxxxx**xxx*#:k:k*~'•******#*'k****x*****:k***x***x****.'k*4******tx*x**x~k*xx*xxx*x*x SAFETY 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SY IN ORDER TO ADD~OSf:IJ,CRF SERSECRTIUNS SNOULDAESIGOALIZED CAPACITY AND 1 I!iP601 VENTS, II, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: TIIAT 11RHANT5 S NIOT F,TORISTlISB1'ETHEATP:XIS1?IANUAI.TONSUNiFOH 1 TRAFFtCECONTROLIDEVO1CE5 Post-Completion ill, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousandl: DEC 1993 T. _ Est Capital Est 1st Yr Est Annual Project ; m Oper/Maint Oper/btalnt 'f CAPITAL E\pendiLure % of 0 COST tnfl $ Curr $ infl $ COST Curr S Infl S Total i Curr $ SO ~ 0 52J-_ 525 Il% Personal Serv; $00 $U- $ Services: 2 Supplies; i 1 1 1 Land/ROW: 2 192 212 BA% Maintenance; 0 0 0 0 r Construction; 0 0% Services: 1 1 1 Equipment: 0 Oth 1; ELECTRI 1 0 0th 1; XXXXXXX 0 0 0% 0 0 0% 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 I - 0th 2: XXSXXXX + 81 --$1 gl , 221 100% ; TOTAL (Thous): : 5223 $ TOTAL (Thous) proof Y- 0 IV, FUNDING REOUIRF.MENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand); - YR TTL; 76% 1992 1'R TOTAL; $182 5 ,EEB: 5 ;MAR: 5 1g 1: +D,•C. 0 , 1JAN; 30 iSEP: 19 OCT: 0 iND1': 0 , 30 ',JUL; 30 ;AUG; APR: 30 ,MAY, 30 ,JUN;-- % 1'R TTL; 0 5-2-: 1993 l(t TOTA`.. $57 0 : FEB: 0 0 ,SE :MAR- 19 ;DEC: 1 19 ;JAN: ~P: 0 OCT: 19 ;NOV; 'JUN; 0 :JUL: 0 ;AUG; APR; 0 ;MAY: 0 ' - - 0% 1991 - Y,R TOTAL: $0 0 + 'EB; 0 'MAR; 0 ;JAN: 0 'SEP: 0 0 ;NOV: 0 ,DEC; 0 ;AUG: CT~ aPR: 0 ;MAY': 0 ;JUN: 0 JUL: - proof F'U'NDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): (SOURCE; XXXXXXXX' YEAR , I operating , Aid in Auth d Unauth & Certificate ' TOTAL Sold ;Unsold unsold , Grant ; YR GO Bond GO Bond G0 Bond of ObligaCtou( Revenue Conat - S181 + so $0 r i 0 1992 Sp Sp 1$ 4 i 0 0 0 0 1993 0( 0 e7 0 0 i 0 0; 1991 0 0 - $0 $0 Q SO $24 $211 SO proof 0112 Wi~ OR CONSTRUCTION, TTLSt so NOTE: ^ATTACII SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, 202 k i r17 40 000- f --t - 04i1110LL '6seu 1"4 4ve, ili4Rl17 1J4' t''. f ww too 71 .I l~ ` G`f 203 j raz, CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 03-Apr-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL k########*############*#####*###*#***#**#M#####**######**#*w**#*#*#**####**ORGN-NO*Y'EAR# PROJECT TITLE: TORN LANF3 FOR ARTERIALS PROJECT: 0010-05 1992 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $105 Thousand Month Year TTL EST 1st. YEAR 001 COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: FEB 1992 '11, EST ANNUM. 001 COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: DEC 1993 1, BR[FF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: t:'ONSTRCCT TORN LASES (LEFT OR RIGHT) Al' INTERSECTIONS FOR CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: (APACITY AND TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVI:> F.NT WHICH REDUCES FUEL COSTS FOR THE ~IDTORING PUBLIC - 11[. PROJECT BUDGET (DoLlars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Complet[on Est Capital DEC 1993 Project _ Est Ist Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of OCOST Oper/4aint $ CuOrer/ Infl alot $ COST Curr 5 Inn S Total : Services: sG~ $6 6% : Personal Serv; $0 $0 $0 $0 Land/ROW: 2 2 2% Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 88 95 90% Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 0% Services: 0 0 0 0 0th 1: TESTING 2 2 2% ; 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 O% ; 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous): $98 - $105 100% : TOTAL (Thous):v $0 $0 $0~~ $0 -roof 0 IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand); Y'R ll _ 1992~~-- Y'R TOTAL:- $68~~ % YR TTL: 65% OCT. O :Nov: 0 !DEC: 0 ;jAN: 0 !FEB: 2 :MAR: 2 APR: I ;MAY: 0 !JUN: 0 !JUL: 20 ;AUG: 20 iSEP: 20 YR 2: 1993 YR TOTAL: $37 % YR TTL: 35% OUT: 10 lNOV: 25 :DEC- 2 !JAN: 0 :FEB: 0 :MAR: 0 i APR; 0 MAY: 0 !JUN: 0 :JUL: 0 :AUG: 0 iSEP: 0 i YR 3: 1991 YR TOTAL: $0^ % YR TTL: 0% OCT: 0 1NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 lJAN: 0 :FEB: 0 1MAR: 0 A PR; 0 .IAI'; 0 :JUN: 0 :JUL: 0 :AUG: 0 :SEP; 0 proof 0 i V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest. Thousand): ' ;Ruth & Unauth h! : :SOURCE: XXXXXXXXI YEAR I' Sold :Unsold Unsold ! Certificate : Operating : Aid in ) YR GO Bond :GO Bond GO Boad :of Obllgation: Revenue : Const Grant : TOTAL 1992 $0 $0 $68 s0 1993 0 0 37 : 0: 0: 0 0: 37 L' r 1991 0: 4 0: 0: 0 0 0 0 , TTLS: SO : $0 sl0;i $0 s0 s0 s0 $10~ - - proof -0.21 NOTE. ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LIND, R0, OR CONSTRUCTION. 204 I 5 - 1 i 10. 0 NIS T?i ♦ f i OAQSOLL ?i 40cu j LO. It M V 203 C 10 C5 ti~ S V1, 22rIiF ,1 4 r Y 03-Apr-91 DATE li CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL I)SVHOVENE\1T PLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT d: 0010-O6 1992 *#*####***###*###**###*##*##*IAN*SIGti,1LS##*#**#**#####*#***###***#*##**#*#ORUN #YE. tLh Year Year pROJICT TITLE: SE.DESIR S32 Thousand FIST START DATE: MAR 1992 1993 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: JAN I M, EST IsL Y'F.:VR U3!E COST: 0 Thousand AS\L'A1, 001 co:i'f: Tl'E. [.'ST BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: USING PRUVIUE PEDESTRISAFETY AE CR SSINGS ATTEACHCINTE:RSECTIO\?RAFFIC CONTROL UE:1'li'E5, THERE MILL DE T 11 PRUJECTgp PROJECT BENEFII'S/PURPOSE: DESTRIAN SAFETY GIVI\G SUFFICIENT WARNING TO THE MOTORING TO PRU1'IDF. PE pIBLIC, PUS t-Completton PRUJEC'T BUDGET lUollars to Nearest, Thousand) JAN 1993 : Est fat Yr Est Annual Est Capital Protect pper/Maint Oper/Maim E%penditure % of 0 & M ' Curr $ Infl S Curr S Infl S CAPITAL Total ; COST _ i:OST Curr $ 1141 $ Personal _ erv: $O 0 0 1.: 9 1% 0 D services: 0 0 0% Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Land/ROW: 30 93% Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 p 0 Construction: 28 O% Services: 0th I: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0% 0th 2. XXXXXXX _ SO I Otit 2: IXXXXXI 0 -TS32 100% TOTAL (Thous): $0 ==ce=ea=r TOTAL ( 30 fhous); $30 - ' proof V. FUNDING REflL'IREMENT5 (Dollars to Nearest Thousand) I _ % YR TTL: 53% 1 TOTAL: $17 0 )FEB: 0 ;BAR: lO YR It 1902 ~Y0 )DEC: 0 )JAN: 0 ;AUC: 5 !SEP' - OCT: 0 1NOV: 0 iJUN: 0 !JUL: _i~ - j APR: 1 }fAY: 1 41% Y'R TTL: 9R TOTAL: S16 0 ;MAR: 0 1R2: 1993 , 5 )JAN: 0 )FEBt 0 'ifiEP: 0 5 ;NOV: ,DEC: 0 OCT 'JUL: 0 iAUG: 0 MAY: 0 APR: % Y'R iT~rL r Y'R TOTAL: $0 0;MAR: 0 - % Y'R 3: 1994 0 ;JAN: 0 )FEB: SEP: 0 t OCT: 0 ;tiOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JUL: 0 IAUG: 0 APR: 0 )KAY: 0 IJUN: 1_ proof ~0 p i V, FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand!: SOURCE: XXXXXXXX YEAR ,Ruth & Unauth &I Operating { Aid in TOTAL Y'R GO BSoldoltd ;Unsold Unsold I Certificate) Revenue ) Const Grant GO Bond GO Bond :of ObLigation, i_,. -•-$~7 ) i i $0 $0 J ' $17-- $0 0 $0 i 1~ WSO i SO 15 0 0 i 0 0 ' 1992 0 0 1991 1991 0 0 0 --.1_-._--- $0 S32 it SO i =~~--0''-a=a=a==== proof -0.24 TTLS, $0 $O --___._,_~~__~---=1- LON, ATTACR SITE !SAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LASD, Row, OR coNSrRLCT \OTE: 2Ob tt ,i i r 1 J ° .o ~ f -FJ _ r ! a.M►oti I LAC u a. are. a Do"" os. r7 LOW I is 207 I, k 1~1' W 14'I i i i I i P i PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1993-1994 f ~I I it { 209 F- T i CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 03-Apr-91 DATE f}3~~; PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT TITLE: ARTERIAL TURN LANES PROJECT OG10-13 1394 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $121 Thousaud Month Year TTL EST lsL YEAR O&M COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: MAR 1994 TTL EST AN51::IL 001 COST: O Thousand EST COMPL DATE: OCT 1994 I. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: T1115 PROJECT WILL PROVIDE THREE TURN LANES (RIGMT OR LEFT) FOR CAPACITY AND SAFETY IMPROWIENT. II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: r NCREASE CAPACITY WHILE IMPROVING SAFETY FEATURES AT CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS, Ill, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion EAL Capital _ OCT 1994 Project ; Est let Yr Est Annual CAPITAL ExpendILure % of ; 0 h M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Infl $ Total ; COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr $ Infl $ Services: $10 - $10 10% ; Personal Serv: $0 -$0 $0 SO Land/ROW; 2 2 2% Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 88 109 88% ; Maintenance. 0 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 0% ; Services: 0 0 0 0 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 OLh 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous): $100 $121 100% TOTAL (Thous):~ $0 $0 ~$0 $0 proof 0 i` IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): 1R Ir 1994 YR TOTAL: $83 % YR TTL: 68% OCT: 0 !NOV: 0 !DEC: 0 :JAN: 0 :FEB: 3 :MAR: 3 APR: 2 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 :JUL: 25 !AUG: 25 !SEP: 25 1'R 2:`-1996 YR TOTAL: $38 % YR TTL: 31% OCT: 25 (NOV: 13 !DEC: 0 :JAN: 0 !FEB: 0 IMAR: 0 APR: 0 :MAY: 0 !JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 ;SEPI 0 YR 3: 1996 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: -0% OCT: 0 (NOS': 0 :DEC: 0 (JAN: 0 :FEB: 0 IMAR: 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 !JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 !SEP: 0 proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): ;Ruth k Unauth : :SOURCE: XXXXXXXX: Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; CertificaLc : Operating : Aid in i YEAR YR 00 Bond :GO Bond GO Bond :of Obligation; Revenue ; Const Grant ; TOTAL 1991 $0 : $0 $83 ( $0 : s0 ( $0 $0 : 1995 0 0 38 : 0; 0; 0 0: 38 1996 0 0 0; 0! 0; 0 0 0 TTLS: SO : T s0 $121 :u $0 : $0 $0 $G ; $121 -c.- -----_r-m---~-tt-,.~e»s.. ;¢c-szamnaco-ln-d3-:9L3.= .CJA-°p proof -•0.24 NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, IiOW, OR CONSTRUCTION. : 210 r F i 1 .r i? j S 1 0 r r Lac V Avg, ' 4 rte". T N A S L t V LY. 1 .fir'' ' ~ C 4 t~ I k II . i y 1^ 1 1 LNG L. ♦ f,. w Loo. +-LL+L J tr ,i r.~ L. 211 , 'f' Ts. r .4 1 i 2 ..A, r r_ - • x ~s , r CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 27-Mar-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL ********************************************»**************t***************ORON-NO*1'EAR* PROJECT TITLE: STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT 0010-14 1994 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $608 'thousand Month Year TTL EST 1st YAR 0&4 COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: MAY 1994 TTL EST ANNUk~ 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: SEPT 1994 1, BRIEF PROJECT DsSCRIPTION: THIS FUNDING WILL ALL•)W THE CITY STREET DEPARPMFNT TO UNDERTAKE MAJOR REPAIR FOR SHORT SECTIONS OF STREETS UTILIZIN11 RECYCLING AND OTHER METHODS 11, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSEI COST EFFECTIVE USE OF CITY MANPOWER AND FQU'PMENT CAPABLE OF DOING SMALL STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS, III, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital SEPT 1994 Project Est let Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of ; 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Intl $ Total ; COST Curr $ Intl $ Curr $ Intl $ Services: $6U $50 10% ! Personal Serv: $0 $0 $0 $0 Land/ROW: 0 0 0% ; Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Conetructlon; 450 558 90% ; Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 O% ; Services: 0 0 0 0 0th 11 XXXXXXX 0 0 O% ; 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 O% ; Oth 21 XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 , TOTAL (Thous): $600 $608 100% TOTAL (Thou s}:~~ $0 $0 $0 $G a~cmtlueae~e~eco. i anAga~al:~7axRSee enaoyslee~~t~~l proof 0 IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR 1: 1994 YR TOTAL: $608 % YR TTL: 100% OCT: 0 !NOVI 0 !DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 !FEB: 0 :MAR: 0 APR: 0 !MAY: 125 ;JUN: 125 ;JUL: 126 ;AUG1 126 !SEP: 108 YR 2: 1996 Yk TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% OCT: 0 1NOV: 0 !AEC: 0 !JAN: 0 11FEB: 0 IMAR1 0 APR: 0 !MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 :JUL: 0 1AUG: 0 :SEP: 0 i I r r I YR 31 1996 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% OCT1 0 !NOV: 0 :DEC: 0 1JANt 0 !FEB; 0`!MAR: 0 APR: 0 !MAY: 0 !JUN: 0 :JUL: 0 MO: 0 !SEP: 0 proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): !Auth & Unauth &; ; ;SOURCE: XXXXXXXX! Sold !Unsold Unsold : Certificate ; Operating ; Aid In ! YEAR YR GO Bond 100 Bond 00 Bond !of Obligation! Revenue ! Const Orant ! TOTAL 1994 $0 so $608 $0 ; $0 ; $0 ~$0 $608 j 1995 0; 0 0; 0! 0! 0 0! 0i 1996 0: 0 0 0! b! 0 0: b ~ I I I 1 TTLSt $0! $0 $608 ; $0 ! $0 ! $0 $0 : $608 I apt:~5~.ela~~n~s~anomcens~iexae~ance~n«c~od~ec~aeeaasinaeaaanaac~a~adc+a proof 0 - I. NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 212 M <j r, F r I III .~~."`~vL__. _Y::_' i • ~~1 f _ I ~ J _ Lftu If r ; / ^ u w~ ,r ~ r 1001 : p ~i1~1 ~ f rf Iff 213 , , 03-Apr,9L DATE Cl"TY OF DENTON CAPITAL, IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT DETAIL #******##***********#*T##*#*######*#*#*v#####*#*****#**#*#***x##*##00102 *1F 0010- 1092 9 DR PAVING AND DRAINAGE PROJECT d; month 28 Year FT, k0R 1992 PROJECT TITLE: $621 Thousand FEB TTL EST CAPITAL COST; p Thousand EST START DATE! JAN 1993 p Thousand EST Oh1PL DATE; t'TL EST 1st 1'E:AR Ok!t C05T; TTL. EST A\NUAL 0&51 f_UST; #:k*~*~##1'*##:k~t*#t*#'k*#~*#Kt4*K***#***#*'k**#4#*##*##****##4`.##M*##k*#$##*#**#'k##*#*t#**###* If BRIEF PROJECT DESCR'PT10ti; ~ IN PH.\SF IfEXTB OFOFT~EIiURTNTDR,FFROi 133RTOFCOLLINS STREETNG AND DRAINAGE I,I IIf PROJECT'r.'D PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSES FILL. EXISTINGI.ED ACR'I'.S5I:a\D S'IRE:ETIEI.9VAOTlONRQ58lES INCLUDING DRA[vAGEs UNCONTR PoSt~C'ompletlon to Nearest Thousand); lllf PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars JAN 1993 t 1'r Eat Annuctly -Es10 Est capital Opr.r/Maim O Oper/Maint project & Cr1P1TAL Expenditure= % of ; COST T Curr $ lnfl $ Curr $ Infl $ COST Curr S lnfl $ Total i - $o --so - w so SO - SO Personal Serv; $0 0 0 0 Service5s 0 0 Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Land/ROWS 575 621 100% Maintenances 0 0 0 0 ConntI, uct101, 0 0 OX Servleeai 0 0 O Equipment, 0 0 0% . 0th 1; XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0 0th is \XXXXXX 0 O% 0th 21 XXXXXXX 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 $a $0 $O eo~naa~aa::= J1 $621 100% i TOTAL (Thous); $0 TOTAL M)005): $573 _ _ny-:e~.aaaaxe : ..Cacaa~aao:caeaa I Proof 0 h IV, FUNDING REOUIREFIFNTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): _ 1'R TM 56 iR IS 1992 TOTAL; 5418 , 56 ;MAR1 56 0 )JAN! 0 'FERS s 0 ,DEC'; 58 ;RUGS 56 I'SEP OM 0 'N01; GG 'JUN; 56 IJUL! 1 128% 1'R TTL s 0 TOTAL; $173 0 F> HS 0 1~SARs 1'R 2s-~ 1356 iN04'S 56 1DECS 81 iJAIVs p 1 , 0 iSEPs 0 AUG; ccT 0 0111': 0 1JUN; 0 .APR; iJULs 1_.._ I I- 1 y,R T1TAL; $0 % 1'H, TTL s i 0 _ _i99d 0 11~EB; 0 T'S'AR! i 1'R 0 1pEC; 0 (JAN- 0 RUGS 0; tr 0 OCT; 0 ,501'! 0 i}SAY; 0 JLNS 0 %JUL; -,i_-.----..•.---'-- APR; _ proof 0 FUVDINO SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): )SOURCE; XXXXXXXX YEAR In 0 ;Ruth & Unauth ' Sold. {UnK01d Uuaold 1 Certificate i Operating ; Aid t G rant TOTAL ' Cons I 1'R GO Dond (GO Bond GO Bond ;crf obligation! Reventte - I......___- 1 $148 $0 SO 1 173 so 0 0 , 1992 50~ $4480 1093 3 0 1 0 ; 0 0 0 U, 0 0 0 _ S ____•SO '8621- $0 1, zsso ..nn ecn0 _naaasnza.n:na proof S) TTLos azyaeeae,.__nsaa=-ac--4Te,_neeaear OR CONS'fRUCT10N, IS NOTE.: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT [NCLUDE5 L:1Nb214 0w+ I , i i Ej, El- a a©~ l V\I~M=-ffim IF I [Ell • 7 7m] F J1 I` J110 tzl Y-~, OAK P-jam art©-~r=OAK iCl{I~' HICKORY ? .J t yL~01~.. ~~.~-.L9OYY.._J14~-JL1l~ t.J ~i i~,~ 1-•,~ foeww[ ww;j1 I.i I PRAT 1 tf• ~i ~ Dill, 41 Elcl 114 i EadLE ' L.. AlF Ir- \ Ft~~ Am~ ! 'G 0 woo w1 1 I off: ~r ' , ~J~~ j i ! {'If L r S vR, 1~'"0" ALEGRE vrStA I - 3L `~i ~ LO OdHdERRY f r t , / r t HMO 03-Apr-91 DATE CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ****************()RGN-NO*YEAR* PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT oo10-15 1994 q. #YE Year SIDEWALKS/DIKEWAYS PROJECT T[TLE: $12'2 Thousand EST START DATE: FEB x,ea TTI. EST CAPITAL. COST : 0 Thousand OCT 1994 1TL EST 1st YEAR 0&?I COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPi, DATE: TTL EST ANSOAL O&!I C105T: I. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NI) SIUE~ALhS WILL BE PR01'DFALONGTIESIANDISHOPPINGLLECTOR STREETS FOR SAFE [OWES TO s(:]IOOLS, PUBLIC PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE }F;{IESTRIaN SAFETY %ILL BE ENHANCED THUS ENCOURAGING MORE ACTIVITY AND REDUCING AUMIOBILF, TRIPS Poat-CompletjOtL I l (I1R03ECT 13CDOET (Dollars to Nee.rest Thousand): OCT 1994 Es _..Esst Yr Eat Annual Est Capital Project, Oper/Maint Opev/Maint Expenditure % of 0 &`M Cure S Intl $ Cure $ Infl $ C.SPIT,IL Intl S Total i COST _ COST Cure _ $p 5Q $0 Personal 8erv: $0 0 0 0 -Se- rvlcot 2 2 2% ' Supplier.: 0 0 0 0 Larul/ROW: 32 114 02% ServiCes' : 0 0 0 0 0 Constructlont 0 0 0% 8eviea: 0 0 Equl{,mentt 0 p% 0th 11 XXXXXXX Q 0 0 0 Oth 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% oth 2; XXXXXXX 0 CILI, 2: XXXXXXX 0 ~gQ 1;0 $ TOTAL (Thous) caneae=e== a~-c=e=:====_ri Thous): $100 $122 100% TOTAL ( ~ proof 0 !Lo IV. gLNDIN(i REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): 81% r t % YR TTL,: 3 V~.-~ R` TOTAL.: $99 0 FEB: 2 1MAlt. }.i 4 YR 1: 1993 0 ;DEC, 0 ;JAN: , 22 ;SEIPt 25 0 ,NOVi 23 ,AUO: oCT: 0 ;JUN; 23 JUL: IPR: 0 ;MAY: - % YR TTL: 0 lM~1R: o YR TOTAL; S23 0 FE'3: 1895 DEC; 0 IJANt 0 ;SI'P: 0 1'R h;~ _ ° OCT: '21 !NOV: o iJUL: 0 ,AUO: 0 !JUN: u APR: 0% _ r-- x YR TTL: TOTAL: E0 ;MAR; 0 I YR H 3:1996 'JA 0 iDEC: 0 N' p AUG: Q 0 ;SEP: 0 OCT: 0 ;N01': 0 JUN: 0 iJUL: 0 IMAY: APR: 0 FLNi1iNG 50L'ROES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): sUURCF,: xXXXXXrX~ YEAR Sold :Ruth d UUastlcCertificate Opnrating Ald In , TOTAL Con YR GO Bond .GO Bond GO Bond ;of Obllslation; Revenue i at Omni w 599 $0 0 1994 ~_e.Etl $0 p 2s 0 U r 0' 0 4 1900 0 1996 : _ s i -0 -rl $121^i SQ 30 ,I TYLS ~_~$0 ~0 ~ =ecn~e;s::ae~=-==ae~.cee=,=a~-===ma=ao==.s= proof , enn =e,-.=ate=;=n--~=ea=':='~ ' OR CO\3TRUCTI0~1, NOTE: ATTtCfI SITE MP lE PROJECT INCI.LDE5 LAND, ROW, t 216 I Eti op tir ~ 4o C, py f ~ ' ~ - - r 64 t 1 ~ J 4 I ,4 M ltfdv Avg r I i J IF i 1 LN. i r _ ' .J~ f 00 _j Mll poor td~ I 217 rt- ) 1 CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 03-Apr-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL *****************ORGN-NO*YEAR* PROJECT TITLE: AVENUE B PAVING ,010th Year TTL. EST CAPITAL, COST: $137 Thousand TTL EST 1st. YEAR 001 COST, 0 Thousand EST START DATE: FEB 1994 TTL EST ANNUAL. Oh}I COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: SEPT 1994 I. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTIONI AVENUE B WILL BE RECONSTRUCTED FROM EAGLE TO UNDERWOOD INCLUDING SIDEWALK ON OM,' SIDE A.SD CURB AND GUTTER 11. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: EXISTING STREET IS IN NEED OF REPAIR BEYOND WHAT NORMAL MA[NTENANCE OR REPAVING OPERAT[ONS CAN ACCOMPLISH Ili. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-CSEPTompllttetlson - Est Capital 1994 Eat 1st Yr EPt Annual Proje ct 0 & M Oper/Maint OI'1er/Maint CAPSTAN, Expend I ture % or COST Curr $ Infl $ Cure $ Infl $ COST Corr $ Inf. $ Total Services: S7 S7 6% ; Personal Serv: $00 $O $0 $0 Land/ROW: 0 0 0% ; Supplies: 0 0 0 Construction! 105 130 94% ! Maintenance: 0 0% ; Services: 0 0 Equipment; 0 0 0 0 0 i 0th l: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% 0th 1: XXXXXXC 0 0 p 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ( Oth 21 XXXXXXX 0 0 _ $0 TOTAL (Thous): $112 $137 100% TOTAL (Thous):-__ $0 $0 - $0 I AaL3=ecacaae» C7 Y.3~~tl SCSSCA proof 0 IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars t.o Nearest Thousand): 1'R 1: 1991 Y'R TOTAL; $lil - -r % YR TTL: 81%~ 1 0 IDEC, 0 !JAN: 0 !FEB: 3 !MAR; 26 ;SEP: 26 pPR: 0 l1oY: 0 !JUN: 26 !JUL. 26 (AUO: _ lt _ 1996__ Y YR _I..._.. TOTAL: $26 % YR TTL: 19% r 5R OCT: 26 lNOV: 0 lDECI 0 !JAN: 0 lFES7 p !MAR: D APR: 0 !SERI 0 0 !JUN: 0 !JUL: 0 WGI 0 iMAY; ~ - - - % YR TTL: 0% 1k 31996 YR TOTAL: $0 0 !MAR: 0 APROC'T;: 0 0 ! 1. MAY: 0 lDECI 0 !JAN: 0 1FEB: I 0 1MY: 0 !JUN: 0 !JUL: 0 1AU0: 0 !SG[. proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): :SOURCE: XXXXXXXX! lAuth & U«auth &; Sold lUnaold Unsold ; Certificate ! Operating ! Aid In ! YEAR YR GO Bond !GO Bond GO Bond !of Obligation! Revenue ! Coast Grant ! TOTAL $0 -$111 ! $0 ! SO $0 i 26 1991 SD $0 1996 0! D 2~ i 0 0! 0 0! 0 0 D! 0 1996 0 ! 0 _ w. ITI.SI 3b-! $0 $137 ! _ E0 1 !_Oe_ ~~nzasaslaa proof $03 a•^ 2 _;a-a_a:a❑lanncnaaa_aa~,.. -aama~ealaaacn.aae I., NOTE: ATTACK SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 218 f 1 ' l L3GL I I~ ~~U~~~ L JL ~fr,I,~~-'I 'r LJ!__J L Fs aeruAn Lr ~w~ ! - ri . o►n ~l_-,~~ JAS 73, E 1-7 a ,~.~1~ r-""-'~r"_~~rowM wMl! j _ Ew01.E a FF I r j~ ~ tM IM_J•IC 1 1 ~f jj oav`2a w14~ll ! / JAI { ~ 1 I / ~1 'fix w M I y~ ~ ~I k ~4.Zu!4J. ansEl AwNI_~__._. llf ~ ~ 1~ 1 I, G _ 219 .a 1 7 Q11 9 it CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 27-Mar-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT TITLE TRAFFIC SIGNALS PROJECT it 0010-17 '.994 TTL EST CAPITAL COST; $283 Thousand Month Year TTL EST Ist YEAR O&M COST; 0 Thousand EST START DATE; FEB 1994 TTI. EST ANNUAL. 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE; SEPT 1994 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THIS FUNDING WILL PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION FUNDS FOR TWO LARGE INTERSECTIONS OR THREE SMALL INTERSECTIONS DEPENDING ON COMMUNITY NEEDS AT THE TIME 11. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: SIGNALIZATION IMPROVES CAPACITY AND TRAFFIC SAFETY AT INTERSECTIONS MEETING WARRANTS ACCORDING TO IMUTCD III, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completlnn Est Capital SEPT 1994 Project I ~Est 1st Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of ! 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curt, $ Ml $ Total I COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr $ Infl Services; $35 $35 _ 15% 1 Personal Serv:~ $0 $0 $0 $0 Land/ROW: 2 2 1% ! Supplies; 0 0 0 0 Construction; 198 246 84% ; Maintenances 0 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 0% Services; 0 0 0 0 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ! 0th 1; XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 I 0th 2; XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ! 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 ' 1 TOTAL (Thous): $236 $283 100% I TOTAL (Thous)s $0 $0 $0 EO aaaraaaaraaaaanc I a=_naaaaaaaa:aaa -aaa ea_~_al' I I proof 0 IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR 1; 1994 YR -TOTAL; $283 X YR TTL; 100% OCT: 0 :Nov, 0 !DEC; 0 IJAN: 0 IFEB,, 10 !MAR: 10 APRs 15 !MAYS 50 !JUN: 50 !JUL: 50 lAUG: 50 !SEP: 48 YR 2: 1995 YR TOTAL; $0 % YR TTL; OCT: 0 1NOVi 0 !DEC: 0 IJAN; 0 !FEB: 0 MAR: 0 APR; 0 !MAY: 0 !JUN: u ;JUL: 0 1AUG: 0 :SEP: 0 + YR 3; 1996 YR TOTAL: $0 y X YR TTL: OCT; 0 :NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 !JAN, U !FEB: 0 ;MAR; 0. APR: 0 1MAY: 0 !JUN: 0 :JUL: 0 1AUG: 0 lSEP: 0 I I proof 0 V, FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): lAtlth & Unauth i !SOURCE: XXXXXXXXi Sold !Unsold Unsold 1 Certificate : Operating ; Aid in . YEAR YR GO Bond 100 Bond 00 Bond !of Obligation; Revenue 1 Const Grant 1 TOTAL, : 1994 $0 { $0 $293 ! $0 ! $0 ! $0 $0 $283 1998 0! 0 0! 0; 0! 0 0: 0 1996 0! 0 0 0: O i 0 O i 0' 3 I TTLS: $0 ! $0 $283 ! $0 ; $0 1 $0 $0 1 $289 acameaaal-anscmaaar.nenaazlan.aaaaaa:aaalx:ananaaaaaalacansoe a n_eaaa proof 0.48 - NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND; ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 220 ti 09~q~ b ~ r - C ~ 1JI r fo~ N U V QARIIGLL VFT, I Lftu ,A 1. 1 , r' / • Boa too ialL r.j 22l 1I s' Sf C f 1 i - f f. , l: j r i I II 222 i r j { i i i i i i i „I PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1994-1995 1 t + I i 22:1 ! 1 Fs:YL'f%I~ 0 CITY OF DE'NTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 03-Apr-91 DATE i PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT TITLE: ARTERIAL TURN LANES PROJECT d: 0010-21 1995 TTI, EST CAPITAL COST: $128 Thousand Month Year TTL EST 1st YEAR 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: MAR 1995 TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: SEPT 1995 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THIS PROJECT '•~ILL PRO1'IDE THREE TURN LANES (RIGHT OR LEFT) FOR CAPACITY AND SAFETY IMPROYF LENT. 11. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: ISCREASE CAPACITY WHILE IMPROVING SAFETY FEATURES AT CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS. r r. IH. PROJECT IIUDOET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital SEPT 1995 Project Est 1st Yr Est At wal CAPITAL, Expenditure % of 0 & M Oper/Saint Oper/M,+int COST Curr 5 Infl $ Total COST Curr $ Intl $ Curr $ Intl $ Services: $10 $10 ~10% Personal Serv: $0 $0 u $0 $0~ Land/WO : 2 2 2% Supplies; 0 0 0 0 I- Construction: 88 116 88% Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 0% ; Services: 0 0 0 0 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 U 0 0 TOTAL (Thous): W0 $128 100% ; TOTAL (Thous) : $0 $0 $0 $$0 7~OC~tC :T.4?aoot3~ ~ Ot:73C3Lp ptal4+.3+ ....CA»3:~~IISC4 II~` proof 0 • IV. FUNDING REQUIREMrNTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand); YR 1. ITO5 _ YR TOTZ _ $84 % YR TTL: 65% OCT: 0 ;VON: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 :FEB; 3 ;MAR: 3 APR: 3 1,MAY; 0 !JUN: 0 1JUL: 25 !AUG: 25 :SEP: 20 I 1 1 ! ~ f YR 2; 1996 YR TOTAL: $44 % YR TTL: X34% OC'r: 24 1NOV: 20 ;DEC: 0 (JAN: 0 ;FEB: 0 (MAR: 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 1AUO: 0 :SEP; 0 (r' YU 3: ^ 1997 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% OCT: 0 ;NOV: 0 !DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 1FEB: 0 }MAR: 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 0!JUN; 0 ;JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 ;SEP: 0 proof 0 i V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Auth & Unauth ! !SOURCE: XXXXXXX%; Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; Certificate 1 Operating ! Aid in ; YEAR YR 60 Bond !GO Bond GO Bond !at Obligation; Revenue ! Const Orant ; TOTAT, 1933 SO ! SO S84 ! $0 ; $0 $0 $0 ; $Fr~ 1096 01 0 4.1 ! 0 0; 0 0; 14 19 9 7 0; 6 0! 0! 0! 0 0! 0 f _ J'4_ I I f I ~ I TTLS: SO $0 $128 $0 $0 ! $0 $0 $128 zna37»:-!»aa5eat;_.T.LL.-.:72la-.aaaeana~ml~-nas7r::aaatl rz_~7-.,...v~7s75:7 proof -0.32 NOTE: ATTACH SITE }LIP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 224 l7 1 •J ' OARMOLL ,w l i ` i 1~4CY a r, ~ 7LAlLL1 lAl. A. Y r ~ J~`l~l o F' M ti Y ~ yV 1 1 . ~ L00/ 2 1.111 ~ 225 T i ih CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 27-Mar-91 DATE i PROJECT DETAIL **************************ORGN-NO*YEAR* PROJECT TITLE: STREET RECONSTRUCTION Month Year TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $322 Thousand EST START DATE: MAY 1995 TTL EST Ist YEAR O&M COST: 0 Thousand TTL EST ANNUAL 0&N COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: SEPT 1995 # L EST &M CO**#~***###~~*#**~:i*k##*#*##***~*******##**#*****~:##*#*#***#*****#**9~' I. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION THIS FUNDING WILL ALLOW THE CITY STREET DEPARTMENT TO UNDERTAKE MAJOR REPAIR FOR SHORT SECTIONS OF STREETS UTILIZING RECYCLING AND OTHER METHODS [I. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: COST EFFECTIVE USE OF CITY MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT CAPABLE OF DOING SMALL STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. etion III, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest 'thousand): Post-Completion SEPT lets 1996 Est Capital , Est let Yr Est Annual Expenditure % of ; 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint CAPITAL COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr S Infl COST Curr Infl $ Total Services: Y $28 - $26 10% ; Personal Serv; $0 SU $Q T Land/ROW; 0 0 0% Oupplies: 0 0 0 0 Construotion: ?.26 297 90% ; Maintenances 0 0 0 0 O% ; Servicest 0 Equipment: O 0 tlth 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0th 1:'XXXXXXX 0 0 O% 0 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% , 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 322 1002, ; TOTAL (Thous), - $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL (Thous): $260 - $ vaanamnssxa_ ass anxxassacaaaa', proof 0 IV. FUNDING REQUIREIMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand). _ _ YR TOTAL: $322 % YR TTL: 100% Y'R 1: 1995 OCT 1 0 !NOV: 0 , ,DECt 0 iJANt 0 lFEB: Q ;MAR: 0 APR: 8 ;MAY: 64 (JUN: 60 ,JULt 80 'iAGO: 60 ; :SSEP: 10 YR 2: 1996 YR TOTAL: $0 X YR TTL: 0% 0 ,MAR: 0 OCT' 0 lNOV: 0 ;DECt 0 JAN: APR: 0 'AUOt 0 ,SEP: 0 0 ;vAY: 0 iJUN: 0 lJU1.: ~ , ~ 97 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTLt~ 0% 1'R 3: ✓19 0 ;NOV: 0 !DEC: 0 !JAN: 0 0 !FED: : 0 0 ;:MAR: O OCT l . : 0 t APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 ,JUN: 0 AL: , proof V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousantil: ;SOURCE: XXXXXXXX Auth & Unauth &; , Sold ;Unsold Unsold ! Certificate ; Operating , Aid In ; YEAR j yR GO Bond !OO Bond 00 Bond ;of obligation' Revenue ' Const Grant ! TOTAL' - - S~ i------ i , 1995 50 ! $0 $322 1 $0 1 $0 ..E0 $322 O ! 0 0 ' 1998 01 0 01 0~ 0! 0 0 0 1997 l1 , 0 TTLS: $O 80 1322 $0 .-._i $$0 $0 ' ~ $322 ' . ! ! OF ! Yf1. ~C07y ~tlRC9'~:.".7C:.x:1.r.Rd'al Cn ~si~R~p3x T..:~ f'9~=.'.bfl S'.". it.-. -f"-GGfJ'~~S~Ltl~'~+x'Ctl re1f I ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW) OR CONSTRUCTION. NOTEt A 226 I uersea~ li. } Ij 1- . i ~ iiARR9LL i T-T ►r_ Aye, rlAlllr ur. a I r . it N7 w Row ~R LOOO tit «~,l I L C Goa zZ 727 i 1 11~.°: )41 fj1 1 .x3,:4: 1 j I CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 03-Apr-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL #~*#**####~#*K##~#*~#*~~*~*~***~*##~*#t**~~*>1#~**k#*~~~*~**~~**#*~*~*~•**~#*ORON-NO#YEAR* PROJECT TITLE: WESTWAY PAVING AND DRAINAGE PROJECT q: 0010-23 1995 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $301 Thousand Month Year 111 EST 1st YEAR 001 COST: 0 Thousand ES START DATE: FEB 1993 TTI. EST ANNVAL 001 COS'T'; 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: DEC 19+96 . kr~*'k#*#*'K9•*~•k*#~Mk#x#####;#'+#*#*##**#*M**k**#**t#*ffi###.K###~.';%'k*t###*4######***~*#*f*#:k~;##** I, BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THIS FM IDES PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS FOR WESTWAY STREET BETWEEN FULTON AND CARROLL BLVD. II, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: '[HE EXISTING STREET HAS DETERIORATED TO THE POINT THAT RECONSTRUCTION INCLUDING PROPER DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE NEEDED TO INSURE PAVEMENT DURABILITY III, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thounaud): Post-Completion Est Capital DEC 1996 Project ; Eat 1st Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure of 0 & ,M Oper/Maint Oper/Malnt COST Curr $ Intl $ Total ) COST Curr $ Intl $ Curr $ Intl $ Services; ^$24 $24 ~y 10% Personal Serv: 30 $0 SO $0 Land/ROW: 5 6 2% ! 3uPPlleat 0 0 0 0 Construction; 206 292 88% Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 " Equipment: 0 0 0% i Services: 0 0 0 0 - 0th It XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; Oth It XXXXXXX 0 0 0' 0 Oth 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; 0th 21 xxxxxxx 0 0 0 0 f ~ J~ b0 $0 $0 TOTAL (Thous): $236 $301 100% ) TOTAL (Thous): x1 E 'aa~_e_aa_.aasanr ) c.~-ra~eae.t__..__=aaasn.:a_cnsaa proof 0 IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): 1'R 1: - 1905 YR TOTAL: $163 J % YR TTL: 54% OCT: 0.1 NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 )JAN: 0 !FEB! G !MART 5 APR: 5 ;MAY: 10 ;JUN; 0 1JUI: 46 ;AUG: 46 )SEI': 46 YR 2: 1996 Ya TOTAL: $138 % YR TTLt 46% OCT: 46 )NOV1 46 )DEC: 46 ;JAN: 0 :FEB: 0 )MAR: 0 IPtt: 0 :MAYt 0 ,JUN: 0 l,IUL: 0 ;AUGt 0 :SEP: 0 YR 3: 1.997 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% OC'T' 0 lNOVt 0 1DEC: 0 :JAN: 0 !FEB: 0 )MAR: 0 APR: 0 !MAYt 0 !JUN: 0 :JUL: 0 !AUG: 0 !SEP: 0 i , proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearc.-~t Thousand): jAUth It UI1sUth + !SOURCS: XXXXXXXX) ' i 1 Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; Certificate i Operating Aid In i YEAR YR GO Bond :GO Bond Go Bond ,of Obligation! Revenue ; Const Grant ! TOTAL -1995 90 $0 -$163 ; $0 1 $0 i $0 $0 1 $163 j 1996 0; 0 138) 0 0 0 0+ 1997 0! 0 0 0: 0! 0 0! 0 I TThS, l so ~~$0~ 8301 $0 w $0°{ $0 $0 ! v$301 _ +=aacaxeaaneaaaaaa aaaaaaaa~aeaaa_ee:>>napaa~x4_a-zacae:aa_ai__-• i proof -0132 NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION, i j .228 I- ILI, i ~ PAWN; JI I v a \ Aeo, 11111~ as ruC a. 414 milt; Now ll G7 o w, r d"' ~J r Cli - ° 57 Hill ~~.ao As briTlOM,rs U w ccAno~~ L~ q I~ ~I = ~1 +~nnara cf, I r~evaroA ~I I 1~ J 61 AC I f>M NNr, )AO Fill L-JLA -1 i VNIVERSITY OR. NEST ..J ~ f An=t Lj FIJ E CICL !J F~ J 4J ~ ~L- - ❑a~(/. ( q • ° LJI 1 4 i X. OAK L...,I_._1 i-'`...~..~. ` 7~`• 11 wHICKORr ©~L31LJ ®LJ ~~:1~1"....'~!II QCM low 47,I OTM I ~ 7r~n f~ 1 !E CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 03-Apr-91 DATE PROJECT DET11L #*##***#*~*#***#**.##*#**#**#***##**####***###*R##**###~####****#*###*##**#**ORGN-NO*YEAR# PROJECT TITLE: FT WORTH DR I35-COLLINS PROJECT k: 0010-03 1993 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $699 Thousand Month Year TTL EST 1st YEAR O&M COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: JAN 199.1 TTL EST ANNUAL 00I COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: MAR 1994 I, BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT PHASE II OF A 4 LANE DIVIDED THOROUGHFARE (SDH&PT) FROM IH36 TO COLLINS ST f,ITH A WIDE MEDIAN TO PROVIDE FOR FUTURE EXPANSION TO 6 LANES 11, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: PRIMARY REASON FOR RECONSTRUCT IS TO PROVIDE CAPACITY AND TRAFFIC SAFETY lMPROVF.M0TS BY CONSTRUCTING A MEDIAN AND IMPROVING DRIVEWAY ACCESS 111, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital MAR 1994 r Project Fat lat Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure X of i 0 & %I Oper/Malnt Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Infl $ Total ; COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr $ Infl $ Services: $15 $15 2% ; Personal Serv: $0 $0 $0~ ^$0 Land/ROW: 0 0 0% ) Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 575 667 95% ) Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 0% ; Services: 0 0 0 0 f; OLh 1: TESTING 15 17 2% ; Oth 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 ; Oth 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0- U TOTAL (Thous): $608 $699 100% , TOTAL (Thous) : $0 $0 $0 $0 C -onuaaaacaaaacaa i ---~zaaaneeaa__s aaay proof 0 IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Y'R 1: 1993 YR TOTAL: $392 ~X YR TTL: _ 66X - OCT: 10 :NOV: 0 :DEC: 0 )JAN: 0 (FEB1 0 iMAR: 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 87 ;JUN; 87 ;JUL. 87 ;AUG: 87 [SEP: 34 YR 2: 1994 1'R TOTAL: $307 % YR TTL; 44% OCT: 34 ;NOV: 34 ;DEC: 14 ;JAN: 34 )FEB: 34 ;MAR: 34 ;APR: 34 ;MAY: 34 ;JUN: 36 ;JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 ;SEP: 0 YR 3: 1995 Yft TOTAL: $0 % 1'R TTL: Ox OCT: 0 ;NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 ;FES: 0 ,k;1R: 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 iJUL: 0 )AUG: 0 i;EP: 0 proof 0 V, FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): ;Ruth & Unauth &; ; ;SOURCE: XXXXXXXX Sold ;Uaaold Unsold ; Certificate ; Operating ; Aid in ; YR GO Bond ;GO Bond 00 Bond iof Obligation; Revenue ; Const Grant ; TOTAL 1993 $0 ; $392 $0 ; $0 ; $0 ; $0~ $0 ; $392 1994 0 ; 307 0 ; 0 ; 0 1 0 0 ; 307 1995 0; 0 0; 0 0; 0 0; 0 I I 1 ~ TT1.3: 30 ; $699 $0 ; $0 ; $0 ; $0 $0 ; in 2 5699 aaaaiaa:azvmaam-c ascaioacnnan~-_a:a(❑sagaaaaza>:aimaaaar.aeaa^°`..a-s prorif -0,4 NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROWI OR CONSTRUCTION, 230 i i xs _ _ r" Nt ~ rPM a i . E _ J ~ y ~ ~ r. i ' _ ~'..J~. alt . - _ y d i 4{ ~t del ei f., a.l ! J tre - r r (y( p 151 t ye I ^.I r - ` 4\ 1 r ! -F -it t. 1t~ N.,w t11 'Q J ~ + ill ' m/ltyti\/~4 V1 1 t / , I J _ p 4..~ i 11 I ~y t I11w ~ I~~ ~J'~!'~`",r'~ ~_14 I . 11~ ~.ANr I 10 gel. lilt, i 4 ' Fars=:'^a 1 , i 3 1 t 1 i L . , I i j 232 i ! ! 1 i PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1995-1999 i ~ ,xl fi I i i 233 , n 27-Mar-91 DATE CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT DETAIL *******************r*************#***#*******#*******M*****PROJECT #p******0010-50*YE1995 PROJECT TITLE: Misc Street Const /Reronst Month Year T1'L EST CAPITAL COST: $322 Thousand 0 Thousand EST START DATE: JAN 1995 1995 TTL EST 1st YEAR o&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: AUG I TTL EST ANNUAL 0&N COST: *#tk*******##*******#*********************#*********************#*******************# I, BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This fun for ding wIll repai+ II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: small Cost effective 'Be of the city' manpower and equipment capable of doing sl.reet reconstruction projrats Post-Completion III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand)! - AUG le ✓ _ 1996 Est Capital , Est 1st Yr Est Annual Project i 0 & M Oper/Ma1nt Oper/Maim ! ; Curr $ Infl $ C+arr $ Infl CAPITAL, Expenditure % of Curr $ Infi S Total COST CT Os i Perso-nal Serv: $0 $0 $0 $0 Services: 525 $25 ]OX 0 p 0 0' Land/ROW: 0 0 OX Supplies: 0 0 0 Construction: 22a 290 9 Maintenance: 0X Services: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0% Oth 1: XXXXXXX 0 4 Oth It XXXXXXX O OX i 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 Q 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX ~ SO $0 $0 $250 x$322 100% ; TOTAL (Thous): ~ -=~-"-~.==7 - - TOTAL (Thous): EO proof 0 CV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): 10UX } 995 YR___ fOPAI : $322 - % YR TTL: YR 1 0 ;JAN: 40 iFEB: 40 1MAR: 40 20 `w OCT., 0 !MAYMAY: 0 30 , DECJUN: : 32 JUL: 40 {A(1Q: 40 ;5EP: 10 ; , APR: TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0 1 YR 2: 1996 p ;JAN: Q ;FEB; 0 iMAR: OCT: APR: 0 0 !Nov: ,MAY: 0 0 ;DECJUN: : 0 ;JUL: 0 ;AUG Q ',SEP: 0 ~ , . ! _ 0% YR 3: 1997 YR TOTAL: $0 IJAN: % 0 ! YR FEB., Mt 0 iMAR: 0 OCT: 0 iNOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 ;AUG: 1 APR: 0 .MAY: 0 ;3EP: 0 _ proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Ruth & Unauth &; i50URCE: XXXXXXXXi YEAR ; - ~ Sold ;linsoId Unsold ; Certificate ( ORevenueE CAid onstn Grant TOTAL YR ao Bond ;GO Bond GO Bond ,of Obllgation~ , 50 i $322 i $0 1996 $0 $0 $322 to $0 1996 0 0 0 0 0; 1997 0 Q p; 0 0 0 0 Q ; _ - - _ - _ X322 proof 0 { TTLS: SO $U $322 , $0 $0 $0 W -OH CONSTRUCTION. E NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES rLAND, RQ r ` 234 i : h s t r3••-r_aap X40 d` 1 I t s Lac v 61.1 Avg. VIk1LIV 6& I 235 y '4 1 ty, e ~j aa1.~1::1 : CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 20-Jun-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT TITLE: INTERSECTION CONTROL SIGNALS PROJECT 0010-61 1995 TTL EST CAPITAL "OST: $120 Thousand Month Year TTI. EST lat YEAR O&M COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: AUG 1995 TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: 0 'thousand EST COMPL DATE: JAN 1906 1, BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: IN ORDER 'CC ADDRESS INCREASED TRAFFIC VOLUMES BY PROVIDING CAPACITY AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS, TWO MAJOR INTERSECTIONS SHOULD BE SIGNALIZED II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: INCREASE MOTORIST SAFETY AT VARIOUS INTERSECTIONS THAT MEET TRAFFIC VOLUME WARRANTS SET FORTR BY THE TEXAS MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): post-Completion Est Capital _ JAN 1996 Project Est 1st Yr Est Annual j CAPITAL, Expenditure % of ; 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Infl $ Total COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr $ Infl $ I 1 Services: YT $9 $11 10'% ; Personal Serv: $0 $0 $0 $0 1 Land/ROW: I 1 1% ! Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 42 50 45% ; Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 Equipment: 41 56 44% ; Services: 0 0 0 0 Oth 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; Oth 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; 0th 2; XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous): $93 $120 100% TOTAL (Thous): $0 $0 $0 $0 kj; proof b IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Neatest Thousand): YR 1: 1906 YR TOTAL: $120 % YR TTL: 100%~ _ OCT: 3 !NOV: 3 ;DEC; 3 ;JAN: 3 ;FEB: 0 ;MARL 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 22 ;JUN: 22 ;JUL: 22 ;AUG: 21 !SEP: 21 YR 2: 1996 YR TOTAL: $0 f; YR TTL: O% OCT: 0 :NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 ;FEB: O :MAR: 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 SxPt 0 ' I I I 1 I YR 3: 1999 _ YR TOTAL:~ $O M% YR TTL: 0% OCT: 0 ;NOV: 0 iDEC: 0 iJAN: 0 !FEB: 0 !MAR: 0 APR-, 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: O ;JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 OP: 0 proof 0 V. FUNDINO SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): ;Ruth & Unauth &; ; ;SOURCE: XXXXXXXX! Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; Certificate: ; Operating ; Aid in ; YEAR YR 00 Bond 100 Bond GO Bond ;of Obligation; Revenue ; Const Grant ! TOTAL '1995 $0 ; $0 $ilo ; $0 ! $0 ; $0~ $DW! $120 1996 0 0 0; b; 0 0! 0 1997 0! 0 0; 0; 0 0 0 0 TTLS: SO i $0 $120 ; $o ; $0 ! $U $0 ! $120 .._eeu_mz;emcaZ===atzzzm ee;a_rnee=~.nn~xlac,ae esaoemalam aadn~a_nssaca~ proof 0 NOTE: =ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LANDS ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 236 t •,4~CQra6 ~ Yom- . t _J Y J I .nri 1I tJt „ A~ T•J • r..Lw.M 1 r I W . l' v • ! ^ ~.Ilf t1y!' LLUL Will J t,ee► I1 >.37 ~ t , ! i xa. I e 1 ~ i 27-Mar-91 DATE CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN E 4 k PROJECT DETAIL ~ *******#***do*##**********#**#****#******#*#*>~****#•**#*##**#*PROJECT#M*k.**#*OQ10-52~YE1995 PROJECT TITLE. Sidewalk Construction Month Year PEAR COST 0&M ; COST; $128 Thousand t 0 Thousand EST START DATE; OCT 1995 TTL TTL ES'f EST 1sCAPITAL TTI. EST ANNUAL 0&M COST; 2 Thousand EST COMPL DATE; Year 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION; shoppingiareast streets for safe along routes sidewalks schools, pPublilcrifacilit.iesarterials II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: Pedestrian safety will be enhanced thus encouraging more activity and reducing automobile tripe , Post-Completion III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousasd)' _ JUL 1996 Est Capital Eat 1st Yr Eat Annual Project ; U M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint Expenditure % of Curp $ lnfl $ Cut'r $ Infl $ CAPITAL , ~ COST Curr $ ]nfl $ Total COST ~ _ - ) Personal Serv: $0 $0 X51 $1 Ssrvices: 00 $10 7 2% $ dppilesi 0 1 1 Larid/RON•: T Maintenance; 0 U j Construction: 88 11.6 88% Maa: 0 0 0 0 Equipment; 0 0 0% ) 0 U 0 0 0 0% ) 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 O 0 0 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 ' 0th 2: X:4XXXXX ~ - t2 $2 i $Q TOTAL (Thous): $100 $128 100% TOTAL (Thous): $0 , " _aaaean.a--~a° aa_„a_a_aosr -proof 0 IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): 10- YR TOTAL: 5128 % YR TTL: YR I: 1995 OCT,, 2 1 NOV 2 ;DEC: 2 ;JAN; 2 iFEO: 0 19W 30 ;MAY: 30 ;JUN: 30 )JUL; 30 1IAUG; 0 ;)gip: O APR: YR TTL: UX YR 2; 1996 YR TOTAL: $0 % % R T 0 )MAR; 0 AYR: 0 D ! ;NOVMAY:; 0 )DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 ;SEP: 0, OCT: 0 ;JUN; 0 ;JUL; 0 ;AUG: % YR TTL: YR UCT : 1997 0 ;NOV; U !DEC; 0 )JAN: 0 !FEB: 0 )MAR: ; APR: 0 ;MAY; 0 JUN; 0 JUL; 0 ;AUG: 0 SEh: 0 _r_~_.I,._ proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): SOURCE; XXXXXXXX; ; Auth & Unauth &; ) 1 SOURCE: Sold! ;Unsold Unsold ; Certifieato Operating i Aid in GO Bond GO Bond ;of Obligations Revenue ; Const Grant Yft GO Bond ) TOTAL' ._--~-.-r----,-~-- _ SO _$9 - $0 i ^128 1996 $0 1 $0 $128 ; ~$0 ) 0 ; 0 0 ' 1996 0 00 0 'i 0 0 i 0 0, 0 1 1997 0 _ - E0 b 128 q ; aaa_n:ncoatic>Qa proof 0,16 TT LS; 21 8 i $0 i I $0 1 LS: r $ agar.-:a-..assn)aasreria~=-Ma:aia"arrCONBTRUC:riON: NOTE: -ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR M 238 I 1 f.2i'af'':+Ft i. 1 .s f I I rl I I I i u r ' N. Avg, J~(.M Viol a ~ 239 . 1 { WW" 4 1 27-Mar-91 DATE CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT DETAIL ****#**#***..x*##*##*#*t#*#*#*##*#***#*#*#*#***#*+*#*#***#*#*#PROJECT* 0010-53 1995 PROJECT TITLE: Turn Lanes for Arterials Month year $130 Thousand ' TTi. "ST CAPITAL COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: OCT ]995 1995 TTL EST 1st YEAR 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: DEC TTL EST .kNNU 31. ObM COST: 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCHIPrION: Construct turn lanes (left or rig)1t} at intersections for capacity improvement, TI, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: Capacity and traffic safety improvement which reduces fuel costs for the motoring public Post-Completion , III, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): DEC let Est Capital , Est 1st Yr Est Annual Project; i 0 & M 0{er/Maim 4per/Maim C.CO TAl. Expenditure % of Corr $ L:£1 $ Total COST ; Curr $ Intl $ Curr $ Intl $ _ $10- - $12 10% Personal Serv: $o $0 0 0 Serv L iceand/ROWs: 2 2 2% ) Supplies: U 0 Confitructlon; 88 116 88% Maintenance: 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 D 0% Services: 0 0 0 0 Equipment: + 0th 1: XXXXXXX ~ 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0% ; 4th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0th 2: XXXX\XX 0 0 0 OX 0 0 0 ¢ 130 100X ; TOTAL (Thous): $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL (Thous): $100~~$ . proof=- -0 IV, FUNDING R94UIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): yR TOTAL: g(4 _ % 67% REB: 2 ;MAR: 4 YR 1995 OCT: 2 +NOV: 2 (DEC; 2 ;JAN: f 20 ;sEP: 20 APR: 2 1 M+3Y: 0 ;JUN: 0 !JUL: 20 ) AUO : YR TTL: 93% - YR YR 7.: 1996 TOTAL: $66 0 % ;FEB: O ;MAR: 0 APR: 20 ;DEC: 16 ;JAN: + 0 MAR : 0 ' 20 ;NOV: OCT; 0 )MAY: U ;JUN: 0 JUL: 0 ,AUO: i _ _ ~ i TOTAL^ - $0 % YR TTL: 0 YR 3: 1997 0 ;JAN: 0 !FEB: 0 AR : 0 OCT: 0 !NOV: 0 DEC: 0 ~JUL; 0 ,AUG: 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 , JUN: _ proof V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): !soURCS Auth XXXXXX:{Xi Sold ~ & Unauth Operating Aid in YLAR j , Unsold Unsold ~ Certificate ) Revenue ~ Const Grant ; TOTAL YR GO Bond ;GO Bond GO Bond ,of Obligation, , _ - $O $14 0 $0 1 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 56: 199b ; $0 ) + , . 1996 00 i 56 0 0 0 0+ _ 0 1997 $130 SO $0 TTLS: $0 SO $130 ' _ - (^aozaaec-c-.c+amasaxru7eoaoe_ca proof 0.08 -_a~_nn)a~en~aoncan.eaan)~ axc_ee_aae= NOTE; ATTACI{ SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. ',240 a J oy i' s M ~ I Q 00,0 L"W 41 Wool L, T-L-7,.4. , _ ...1 r_j 2a1 1 'r , t CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 27-Mar-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL ~***************,t*#******z******#~s*******#*#*#***********#*#**#**#*********ORGN-NO*YEAR# PROJECT TITLE; Collins St. Pav & Drain Phase 1 PROJECT 0; 0010-h8 '0995 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $433 Thousand EST START DATE: JAN 1995 TTL EST 1st YEAR O&M COST; 0 Thousand TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: MAR 1996 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: - Provide 41 ft. street FtWorth Dr. to Dallas Dr. Includes drainage, sidet4alk 1 side, RR Xing, and relocation of intersection at Dallas Dr, . 11. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: Provide alternative route to Eagle/Bell/Dallas Dr. Intersection and relocates traffic from dangerous intersection at Dallas Dr. III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion MAR 1996 E€t Capital Eat lst Yr Est Annual i UjeCt 1 CAPITAL rspenditure % of ; 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint { COST Curr $ Inf1 $ Total ; COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr $ Inf1 Services: $25 $29 7X ! Personal, Serv: $0 _ $0 $0 50 Land/ROW: 100 108 29% Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 224 296 64% ; Maintenance: 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 O% Services: 0 0 0 00 Ot XXXXX 0 0 0% ! 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 h 1: Xa . 0 , xxx 0 0 2. xxxx otlt oth 2: xxzxXxx o 0 0% , , TOTAL (Thous): ^$349 $433 100% TOTAL (Thous): $0 $0- $0 $0. Proof 0 IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR 1995 YR TOTAL: $140 _ % YR TTL: 32X OCT: 0 ;Nov: 0 (DEC: 0 !JAN: 5 11FEB; 6 {MAR: 5 APR: 5 !MAY: 0 !JUN: 0 IJUL: 40 1AUG: 40 !SEP: 40 - - YR 2: 1996 YI? TOTAL: $293 % YR TTL: 68% 43 ; OCT: 50 !NOV: 50 (DEC: 50 ;JAN: 50 !FEB: 50 IMAR: 0 APR: 0 !MAY: 0 {JUN: 0 IJUL: 0 lAUG: _ % YR TTL: 0% YR 3: 1997 YR TOTAL: 80 !MAR: 0 OCT: 0 !NOV: 0 !DEC: 0 !JAN: 0 !FEB 0 0 iMR: 0 APR; 0 iMAY: 0 !JUN: 0 !JUL: 0 !AUG: proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): :Auth & Unauth !SOURCE: XXXXXxXX! Sold !Unsold Unsold ! Certificate ! Operating ; Aid in ! YEAR YR GO Bond !GO Bond GO Bond !of Obligation! Revenue I Const Grant ; TOTAL - $t40 9995 8o I $0 $140 $oo $o $o $ i 2930 1 1996 0 ! 0 0 ! 0 0 , 1997 0 0 $0 $0 ! 33 fTLS: $O $0 8433 r $0 , n-$0proof 0,432.- t j „naao:o7laac_n.aaswaaan-nlaeaaaamnoneme~nno❑~x_ -,-NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 242 I i Dmil wrr OER5 C~~~ NA [Ell IFp i ~.J1L,._,' - 'CujC 0= L`lco~~RE ~ o it ~p~J I~ , NCR~aruR~LI~~_~_L~~~J o 7~ may- ~~C~IL1 i j I L l` _ aTr it ``JI $ IL JL OF Ic] RN LI_.~- L..Q✓~ R N~LN RYIC_ ~L~~ ~L_ N, w,co Y LAlJ~ guy (DOW w(''~wN' ~,►C.~ ~C~C1 ~Q _ j V - __.,U All FAIAO l ~ ~ 1 CL~~ ~ II E A E _ cL .C E 7 L UL l DID EFEES rl sALECRE vISiA 5 OR. r rri R t CSI aLO towERRY p,- r ~ ou 243 . r RU?~LM'[(1 l k r S e t ' 244 ME i Mill 4. IJ AGcYeti.i+a s i IkeI f OTHER i PROJECTS SUBMITTED r 245 ~i Gtir;:S9te?E' i CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 20-Jun-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT TITLE; Intersection Control Signals PROJECT 0010-51 1995 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $182 Thousands Month Year TTL FIST Ist 1'E.AR O&M COST: 1 Thousand EST START DATE: AUG 1996 TTL EST ANNUAL 001 COST: 2 Thousand EST COCOMPL PATE: JAN 1996 #***####ST ***#**#*******************#A# 1, BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: In order to address increased traffic volumes by providing capacity and safety improviments, two major intersections should be signalized It. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: increase motorist safety at various intersections that meet traffic volume warranty set forth by the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital JAN 1996 _ Project _ ; Est 1st Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Intl $ Total COST Curr $ Intl $ Curr $ Intl $ Services:--$15 $I7 11% Personal Serv:~ $1 $1 $1 ~$1 Land/ROW: 1 1 1% ; Supplies: 0 0 1 1 Construction: 62 75 44% ; Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 Equipment: 64 89 45% ; Services: 0 0 0 0 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; 0th 1: XX3XXXX 0 0 0 0 Oth 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous): `$142 $182 100% TOTAL (Thous):$1 $1- $2 $2 a=-_a_..=as==aaxa ~ L. proof 24 IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR I: 1995 YR TOTAL: $182 - - - - % YR TTL: 100X OCT: 4 :NOV: 4 :DEC: 4 ;JAN: 5 1FE8: 0 ;MAR: 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 33 ;JUN: 33 ;JUL: 33 ;AUG: 33 !SEP: 33 YR 2: 1996 IR 'TOTAL: $24- % YR TTL: 13% i OCT: 24 )NOV: 0 ;AEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 :FEB: 0 ;MAR: 0 APR: 0 )MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 ;.JUL: 0 )AUG: 0 ;9EP: 0 FR-j-., 1997 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% a OCTt 0 )NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 :FEB: 0 ;MAR: 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 1AUG: 0 189p: 0 proof 24 " V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): )Auth & Unauth Ac; ) !SOURCE: XXXXXXXX) Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; Certificate ) Operating ; Aid in ; YEAR YR 00 Bond ;GO Bond GO Bond ;of Obligation; Revenue ; Const Grant ; TOTAL 1995 $0 , $0 $158 i EO 1 $0 i $0 $o 1 $158 1996 0; 0 24 { 0; 0 0 0; 24 1997 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0 T'TLS: $0 ) $0 $182 ; $0 ) $0 $0 $0 $I82 proof 0 NOTE: ATTACH SIT'ErNAPyIFrPROJECT INCLUDES LAND, HOW, OR CaNSTRUCTTON, j 246 - 1 'VM t, CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 27-Mar-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL f ####*#*****#**#*****#***#*#**#**#***#*#*#*##***#*###**#*~*##*#**#*##****~*#ORGN-NO*YEAR* PROJECT TITLE: Corbin Road Bridge PROJECT J: 0010-54 1995 TTL EST CAPITAI. COST: $955 Thousand Month Year TTL EST Ist YEAR O&M COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: OCT 1995 TTL EST ANNUAL. 00i COST. `L Thousand EST COMPL DATE: FEB 1996 I. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide two iane bridge with sidewalk over Dry Fork Hickory Creek at Corbin Road to pass 100 year flood 11. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: 1 Replace existing low water crossing with a bridge spanning the design fluud (100 year) III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Comple.Lion Est Capital FEB !996 _ Project YEat 1st Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of : 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Infl $ Total COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr $ Infl $ Services: $115 $133 16% ; Personal Sam $0 $0 $1 $1 Laud/ROW: 16 17 2% ; Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 609 804 82% Maintenance: 0 0 1 1 Equipment: 0 0 0% Services; 0 0 0 0 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 if 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 I j TOTAL (Thous): -_-$710 $966 100% ; TOTAL (Thous):=^-= $0 _ $0_ $2 _ _$2 I proof 0 IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR 1. 1995 YR TOTAL: $345 % YR TTL: 36% OCT. 18 :NOV: 18 :DEC: 16 :JAN: 18 :FEtl: 36 :MAR! 36 APR: 36 ;MAY: 25 ;JUN: 0 :JUL: 0 !AUG: 0 !SEP: 140 YR 2: 1996 YR TOTAL: $610 % YR TTL: 64% „ OCT: 140 :NOV: 140 ;DEC: 140 :JAN: 140 !FEB: 0 !MAR: 0 APR: 0 :MAY: 0 :JUN: 0 1JUL: 0 :AUG: 0 !SEP: 0 YR 3 1997 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% OCT: 0 !NOV: 0 !DEC: 0 :JAN: 0 :FEB: 0 :MAR: 0 APR: 0 :MAY: 0 :JUN: 0 :JUL: 0 :AUG: 0 :SEP: 0 proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): :Auth & Unauth : !SOURCE: XXXXXXXX! Sold :Unsold Unsold : Certificate : Operating : Aid in : YEAR YR GO Bond :GO Bond GO Bond !of Obligation; Revenue : Const Grant : TOTAL 1995 $0 : $0 $345: $0 : $0 : 30 $0 : $345 1996 0: 0 610: 0; 0 0 0! 610 1997 0: 0 0: 0: 0: 0 0: 0 TTLS: $0 : 30 $956 $0 : $0 LO - $0 C955 l====a====oc:;===a~=c===n=mn~e= proof 0.44 NOTE: AfTACR SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION 247 I 11 CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 03-Apr-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL r.##****#W.####*#******##*##****#####*#*#****#x**k#a~##~#*s•#*****#*#**#***#z:k**##ORGN-NO*YE.1R* PROJECT TITLE: Bernard Street Pav and Drain PROJECT 4: 0010-55 1995 'TTL EST CAPITAL COST: 51,392 Thousand Month Year TTL EST 1sL YEAR 001 COST; 0 Thousand EST START DATE: JAN 1995 T11, 1: ST ANNUAL 0&): COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE; JUN 1996 ***k'K~#*##*'k***#t*#'k*####**##*##**#*~~*##****#*##'k'k****#>ti#**.k#7,###*#:t*##'#*######'%~k####*#*#**>k 1. 'BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: X,1.XXXXProvide 45 foot street including curb and gutter and sidewalk between - \XXXX\Eagle Drive and Hickory street. 1 I[. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: `E XXXXXXProvide additional capacity and proper drainage on Sf:•rna.rd Street which SXX.I"XX+"as designed for single falnilY use but has increasing multifamily use. + i 111. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital - - Project ; Est 1st Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of 0 & M Oper,`Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr S lnfl $ Total COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr $ Infl $ Serrices:y-- -S]54~ 5179 14% Personal Serv: $0 $0 $0 $0 Land/ROW; 58 62 5% Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 872 10151 80% ; Maltutenance: 0 0 0 0 Equipment; 0 0 0% ; Services: 0 0 0 0 0th 11 XXXXXXX 0 0 0% 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 Oth 2; 1XXXXXX 0 0 0% 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous): $1,084 $1,392 100% ; TOTAL (Thous):~ $0 V $0 T $0~~ $0 d proof 0 I IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): 5'R 1: 1995 YR TOTAL: $144 % 1'R TTL: 10% OCT: 0 !NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 :JAN: 2'1 :FEB: 24 (MAR: 24 APR: 24 IMAY: 24 ;JUN; 24 IJUL: 0 IAUG: 0 !SEP: 0 1'R 2: 1996 1'R TOTAL: ~51 , 248 % YR TTL: y 90% OCT: 1.10 1NOV: 1'10 iDEC: 140 :JAN; 140 :FEB: 110 114AR: 140 APR: 140 :MAY; 140 :JUN: 128 ;JUL; 0 !AUG: 0 :SEP: 0 1-R .1; 199, ~YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% OCT: 0 'NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 IJAN: 0 :FEB: 0 :MAR: 0 • 0 'MAY! 0 :JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 = :AL'; 0 !SEP: 0 . AIR. I proof 0 V. FUNDING SOUf?CLS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand); Auth & Unauth i ISOURCE: XXXXIXXXI Sold :Unsold Unsold I Cart1ficate : Operating : AIJ in : YEAR 1R GO Bond !GO Bond GO Bond lo(' Obligation Revenue ! Const Grant I TOTAr. ~1095~ SO 50 $144: $0 $0 : $0 $D I 5ili 1936 0: 0 11248: 0 0 I 0 0 1 IP48 j 1997 0 I 0 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 _0 1 , , I I I [ f'CLS: _ SO SO 31, 392 : 80 s0 $0 SO I s] , :392 »-:ena_ i a:~e~nrx~su n~ci ~rc:nn_n;: c~ea _~m,_c, mar. ~a»~ad eo_aaa_~a proof 0.32 NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LANDI ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 248 y , I CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAIT 03-Apr-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL ! *#*******************#*#**#*s*##***#*#**#**#**~*#***********#*******~*********ORCN-NO*YF,AR* I PROJECT TITLE: Willowood Paving and Drainage PROJECT rr: 0010-36 1993 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $2,645 Thousand Month Year 1'TL EST Ist YEAR 0&M COST: 0 Thousand ES'T START DATE: JAN 1995 TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST CO,MPL DATE: NOV 1997 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ' Rebuild H'illuwwood Street to a 41 foot street with curb and gutter. Il:;a inst?ill adequate drainage systems. (Bonnie Brae to Bernard) II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: f Provide saf,, adequate pavement section on a collector traveled to shopping, schools and also remedy local drainage problems HT, PROJECT Bl'DGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completlon Est Capital NOV 1991 Project ; Est Ist yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of 0 & F! Oper/Malnt Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Infl S Total ; COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr $ Infl $ Services; J $200 $232 10% Personal Serv: $0 $0 - $0 ---$0 Land/ROW; 30 54 2% i Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Construction; 1,787 21359 88% Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 7 Equipment 0 0 0% ; Services: 0 0 0 0 i oth 1; XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; Oth 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 E TOTAL (Thous); $2,037 $2,645 100% TOTAL (Thous): $0 SO $0 $0 proof 0 II', FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to NearesL Thousand): 3 YR F,--595 YR 'TOTAL; $214 _ % YR TTL: u 8% OCT: 0 ;NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN; 21 ;FEB: 42 ;MAR; I? NPR- .112 1XAY: 42 (JUN: 21 ;JUL; 4 MG: 0 ;SEP: 0 1 , 1 1 , ' l'R l; 1996 1'R TOTAL: $2,240 % YR TTL: 83% 1 OCT: 0 ;NOV: 200 )DEC, 200 ;JAN; 204 ;FEB: 200 ;MAR; 200 :NPR; 200 ;MAN': 200 ;JUN: 200 ;JUL; 200 ;AUG; 200 ;SEP: 200 I I I I , YR 3: 1997 YR TOTAL; $231 % YR TTL: 9% OCI', 231 :NOV: 0 ;DEC; 0 ;JAN: 0 ;FEB: 0 ;,MAR: 0 APR: 0 MAY: 0 :JUN; 0 (JUL; 0 :AUG: 0 SEP: 0 proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): ;Ruth & Unauth &; ;SOURCE: CXXXXXXX Sold ;Unsuld Unsold ; Certificate Operating Aid in ; YEAR 1'R GO Bond ;GO Mond 00 Bond ;of Obligation ; Revenue ; Const Grant ) TOTAL , ~1995..-~SO £0 $214 a,0 ; $O £0 $0 , 1996 0 0 6,200 0 0; 0 0 2200 1097 0 0 231 0 0 0; 231 TT L5: $0 $0 :92,645 $0 ; s0 ; $0 ~$0 ! $2,845 _ proof 0.16 NOTE; ATTACH SITE MAP If PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 249 i Illf".iLe: #4 Wit 1 I}r~,{r 27-Mar-91 DATE CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ROJECT ****k* *******ORGN-NO*1EAR 9 5 ' * OO10-57 199 PROJECT k: Year ***********#***********Hyrtle*Street Pav and Drain Month 1995 PROJECT TITLE: $618 Thousand EST START DATE: J AN 1996 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: 0 Thousand APR EgT C01,01, DATE' TTL EST 1st YEAR 0&bl COST: 0 Thousand **:s*************** :ISRCaL 04Ji COST: TTL V'S, I, BRIEF PROJECT DE5CR3pTIU\: sidewalk on one side. and Streets Providr. 31 foot street with curb and gutter, n adequate drainage, Construction will he between Collis and Daugherty } l1. PROJECTED PROJECT BrNEFITS/PVRPOSE: provide adequate access to drainage problem as well as provide adequato access to t Solve existing 1),.tisnesses in the area' Post-Completion tI APR 1996 ii[r PROJECT BUDGEIT (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): J Est 1st Yr Est Eat Capital Annual 'i nt Oper/hSaint Oper/Mai R Protect 0 & M nfi $ Curr S Lrfl "a $ , Expenditure X of ; COST Curr I r CAPITAL Curr S Inf 1 $ Total i `l $~rp0 COST Personal Serv: $0 0 0 0 Services: 10% 1 0.. - r~ E50 ~~3 28X i Supplies: 00 0 142 0 0 Land/ROW: 6290 ; Maintenance: 0 0 a ; 308 407 Services: 0 0 ° Construction: ° 0% ; XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 0 0th 1: I 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% i 0th 2: XXXXXXX 106% 'i TOTAL (Thous?t 818 ` $500 $ TOTAL {Thous?' - - proof 0 - ~ (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): MENTS E 1 R 1Vr FUNDING R AU _ % YR TTL: 33% IC - - YR fOTA?,: $206 - ill 16 IMAR: 1995 YR 1: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 8 0 ism OM 0 ,AUG: 0 ;NOV: 75 ;JUL: 'MAY: 75 1JUN: APRI 16 i _i _ - - 67% ' X YR TTL: 0,-. - - YR TOTAL: $412 70 IFEB: 7Q ~ SEP: yEi'2j 19 6 70 ;DEC: 70 { JAN U ;AUG: : 62 ;NOV: 0 ,JUL: 0 .MAY: b ,JUN: 1~ - ----'r OGT APR: 0% %YR TTL: 0 $O 0.:. MSAR: TOTAL: 1 a iFEB: Y R 0 YR 3: ~ 1997 9 !DEC: 0 .JAN: 0 OCT: 0 ;NOV: 0 ;JUL: 0 ;AUO: 0 ,JUN: APR: 0 ;MAY: proof .1_--- ---.•-1_- L ;SOURCE: XXXXXXRX{ YEAR V, FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Aid lr. ;Auth & Unauth cate I Operating , TOTAL' Sold unsold Unsold fertifl . Revenue Const Grant ' , $ YR GO Bond ;GO Bond GO Bond of obligation! 0 ' i 412 iss5~ so $a $zofi 1 a ; ° I. 0 0 ; o ° 412, 0 , 199 1997 O a I ° I ; u~$9 4q-1 $618' ~Sll 8618 proof 0,08' So ' nmzcaas~aea OR CO _ ROW, 0TE: NSTRUCTION.- OR SITE MAP IF PROJECT 1NCLUDES LAND, -A N 2S0 _~I i r t 27-Mar-91 DATE CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN i PROJECT DETAIL O -NO#ti'E1991 *#*#0000 PROJECT T1T1,E: Coll.lns St, Pav & Drain Phase 2 PROJECT q: Month B Year $657 Thousand EST START DATE: AUG 1995 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: 0 Thousand JAN 1996 TTL EST 1st YEAR 00 COST: EST COMPL DATE: 0 Thousand TTL EST ASNCIL "M COST: 1. BRIEF 1'ROJEC'f DESCRIPTION: a ll foot street betweri Carroll Blvd, and Welch St, Project Provide includes sidewalk and drainage [I, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: This project will construct Phase ]I of the collector street to direct Dallas Drive traffic to UNT at Welch Street Post-Completion III, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): JAN 1996 - Est Capital Est 1st 1'r Est Annu9.1 Project i 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint , Expenditure % of ' Infl $ Curr $ Intl S i Curr $ C.IPICOSTTAI Curr $ lnfl $ Total COST - - Personal Serv: J $0 $0 $O $0 10% r Services: 56 $51 _--$60 11.% Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Land/ROW: r Maintenance: Construction! 407 537 7'iX ' Services: 0 0 0 0 OX 0 0 ; 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 OX i Oth 1: XXXXXXX 0 p 0 0 0 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0% 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 Oth 2: XXXXXXX 0 - --$0 $0 ' $D $0 V $657 100% TOTAL (Thous): r. TOTAL Molls): $Sid r I -proof --a==aoa ' 1V, FUNDING REgUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): ~ 6X YR TOTAL: $108 % 1'R 'PTL: 16 IMAR: 16 R It 1995 0 !DEC: 0 iJAN: 16 :FEB: 0 ~9EP: 0 OGT: 30 ;MAY0 (Nov: 0 ;JUL: 0 (AUG: : 30 ;JUN: APR: _ % YR TIL: 99 YR TOTAL: $549 90 ;MAR: YR 2. 1996 g0 :DEC: 90 ;JAN: 90 ;FEB: 0 ;SEP: 0 OCT! 90 iNOV: 0 (JUL: 0 1.km' APR; 0 ;MAY: 0 ,JUN: r O.% i TOTAL: $0 % NR TTL: 0 1'R 3. 1997 YR 0 ',JAN: 0 !FEB.. 0 ;MAC:: OCT: 0 Nov: 0 'DEC'. 0 JUL: U ;AUG: 0 ;SEP: 0 0 'MAY: 0 ;JU11: APR: proof 0 ~V, FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): SOURCE: XXXXXXIXI YEAR Auth & Unauth & Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; Certificate ; Operatin8 i Aid in r 1'R GO Bond 00 Bond GO Bond ;of Obligation: Revenue Conat Grant TOTAL _ - _ $0 i $0 $0 i $108 1995 $0 y $0 $108 s0 0 , 0 0 i i4Q 1996 0; 0 549 i O 0 O i 1997 _ _ S~ $0 i 957 -657 1 30 xwaacce- roof 0112 -s-aaae-~-:aaciaaaceccaa~c~,aaa- i _1 _cceecae'- - NOTE' -ATTACII SITE MAP if PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION, 251 4 651S~n:Yi'~ I CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 27-Mar-91 DATE 1 PROJECT DETAIL ##***#*#****#***#*******#**##****##*~***#*##*#*#*#*****#**,R##*##**#*#*#**##ORGN-NO*YEAR* PROJECT q: 0010-59 1995 PROJECT TITLE; Maple Street Pav and Drain Month Year TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $583 Thousand 1995 - 0 Thousand EST START DATE: JAN 1996 TTL EST 1st YEAR O&M COST: TTL EST ANNUAL O&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: MAR 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide 41 foot street between Ave D and Welch St, with sidewalk on oue side and adequate dralnage, 11, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: Provide improved access through UNT campus by repairing damaged street and upgrading design features, li L PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand) Post-Completion : MAR l1996 et _ Est Capital Est 1st Yr Est Annual Project ! 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Malnt CAPITA!. Expenditure % of ' COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr $ Inf! $ COST Curr $ Intl $ Total - Personal 5erv: $0 $0 $G $0 i" Services: ~T $45 $52 10% 0 0 0 0 10% Supplies: 0 0 Land/ROW: do 49 Maintenance: 0 0 Construction; 365 48'L 80% ; Services: 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 O 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; Oth 1: XXXXXXX 0 O% 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 _ $0 $0 $0- $0 TOTAL (Thous): $456 $583 100X ; TOTAL (Thous) proof- 0 IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): l YR 1:IC:95 YR TOTAL: $94 % YR TTL: 16% 8 ;FEB 16 ',MAR: 16 r i 0 !NOV: 0 ;DEC': 0 ;JAN: 0 'SEP: 0 OCT: 8 ;MAY: 23 ;JUN: 23 ;JUL: 0 ,AUG: APR: ! _ i I _ % YR TTL: ~94% 1'R 2: 1996 Yfi TOTAL: $489 ' 80 !MAR: 89 i 80 !NOV: 80 !DEC: 80 ;JAN: 80 iFEB: 0 ;SEP: 0 OCT; 0 ;MAY. 0 !JUN: 0 !JUL: 0 ,AUG: APR: - 1 YR 3: 1.997 YR TOTAL: $O % Yft TTL: O ;41AR: O ; 0 ;NOV: 0 !DEC: 0 !JAN: 0 :FEB: 0 OCT: 0 !JUN: 0 ;JUL; 0 ;AUG: 0 ;SEP: APR: 0 ;MAY: _ ! proof 0 T V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): !SOURCE: XXXXXXXX; ;Auth & Unauth &; YEAR Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; Certificate ; )perating ! Aid in YR GO Bond ;GO Bond GO Bond ;of Obligation: Revenue l Const Grant ; TOTAL $0 ! $0 ! $0 so 1 $94 + 489 1996 SO ; 30 494 ! 0 ! 0 0 , 1996 0; 0 489 i 0 0 0! 0 1997 0! 0 0 i 0! 0! !-aa~~xaoac~~- proof 0,4 TTLS: -$o ---aoSO $583 ! $0 lmaea~ $0 $0 $O -ayes===°!=c"-=~ae~eeae~i ao_ac~ti- NOTE: ATTACH SITE !IAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION, 252 I t f 4 . 1 CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 03-Apr-91 DATE i PROJECT DETAIL j ~***********#*************:e**#***###x*##r•:rs#*##**#~**##**#*##*#****####*#####*ORGN-`0#1'EAR# PROJECT TITLE; Kings Row Pav and Drain PROJECT N: 0010-60 1995 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $2,033 Thousand Month Year E TTL EST 1st YEAR 001 COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: AUG 1995 TT1. EST ANNUAL 001 COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: JAN 1996 I. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide a I lane acicrial section with median between Sherman Dr. and Loop 288. Project includes drainage and sidewalk, 1 side 11, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: , Provide additional capacity on Kings Row and access to Loop 288 for much Of NE Denton. 111, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand); Post-Completion Fast Capital JAN 1996 _ Project ; Est Ist Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of ; 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curl, $ Intl s Total ; COST Curr S Intl $ Curr s Intl. $ Services: 5177 $205 11% ; Personal Serv: $0 $0 ~$0 $0 Land/ROW: r0 76 4% Supplies; 0 0 0 0 Construction: 1,327 1,752 84% Maintenance; 0 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 0% ; Services: 0 0 0 0 Oth 1: YCXXXXX 0 0 0% ; 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 Oth 2: CXXXXXX 0 0 0% 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 $0 SO__ »50^ I TOTAL (Thous). $1,574 $2,033- 100% TOTAL (Thous); $0 proof 0- I i IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand), Y'R 1: 1995 Y'R TOTAL: $232 % YR TTL; J11% ' OCT: 0 ;NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 18 ;FEB: 36 ;MAR: 36 APR: 36 ;MAY'; 18 ,JUN; 18 ;JUL; 35 ;AUO; 35 ;SEP: 0 YR 2. 1996 YR TOTAL: $1,500 % YR TTL: 74% OCT: 0 ;NOV: 0 ,DEC: 150 ;JAN: 150 ,FEB; 150 ;MAR; 150 APR: 150 MAY 150 ;JUN: 150 ;JUL: 150 ;AUG: 150 ;5EP: 150 Y11 3 1997 YR. TOTAL: 5301 % i'R TTL: 15% OCT: 130 ;NOV 151 ;DEC; 0 ;JAN: 0 ;FEB: 0 ;MAR: 0 APR; 0 1MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 iJUL: 0 1AU0: 0 :SEP; 0 proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): ;Ruth & Unauth &; ; ;SOURCE: XXXXXXXX Sold ;Unsold Unsold i Certificate i Operating ; Aid In i YEAR Y'R GO Bond ;GO Bored 60 Bond lot Obligation ; Revenue ; Const Grant ; TOTAL ~1995~ SO SO 5232 ; SO ; $0 ; $0 $O ; $232 1996 0 0 11500 ; 0; 0 0 0 1500 1997 0; 0 301 ; 0 0 0 0; 301 TTLS; .:.__50 ; - S0 52,033 50 SO - $0-''- 80 521033 att ; ~mca_enaasnz_s m na.-.ne~anmio proof 0,44 NOTE: -ATTACH SITE ?IAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 253 Y EYiA.;f 3 CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 27-Mar-91 DATE 1 PROJECT DETAIL ****************#**#***************######**#*#**#****#**###*PROJECT##~###**#0010-601#1/E1995 PROJECT TITLE: East Windsor Dr, Pav and Drain 4onth Year W TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $670 p Thousand and EST START DATE: FEB 1995 TTL EST Ist YEAR O&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE; MAR 1996 TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: I, BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION; Widen Windsor Drise to 45 feet between Sherman Dr. and Bristol Ct, project includes sidewalk an one side and drainage. It. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS,'oving traffic flow' In the area, ' Open up eslsting bottle neck improvng 1 Post-Completion PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand); _ MAR 1996 111. , Est Capital ~ Eat 1st Yr Est Annual project 0 & M Oper/Maine Oper/Maint CAPITAL Expenditure % of COST Curr $ Infl $ COST Curr $ Infl 5' Curr 5 lnfl $ Total. 10% Personal Serv: $p $0 0 $0 $O Services: $52 $60 32 fiX ( Supplies: 0 p Land/ROW: 30 Maintenance: Construction: 437 577 8'4% ( p 0 0 0 0 0 0% Services: 0 0 pt Equipment: 0 0 0% 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 p 0th 1; XXXXXXX 0 O% ; 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 Oth 2: XXXXXXX 0 - 100% TOTAL (Thous); $ 0 _$0___ TOTAL (Thous): $519 $610 - proof- 0 IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): 12% _..1R TTL: yg is _ Y1995 YR TOTAL: $78 p !FEB-. 18 (MAR; 16 0 !NOV: 0 )DEC: 0 ;JAN; 0 SEP: 0 OCT: 15 (JUL: 0 (AUGI APR: 16 ;MAY: 15 JiiN: _ I % }R 1'TL; 88% YR TOTAL; $592 100 ;MAR: 92 }'g 2: 1996 100 (DEC: 100 :JAN: 100 iFEB: 0 'SEP: 0 OCT: 100 ;NOVt p ;JU`7; 0 ;JUL: 0 ;AUG: APR: 0 ;MAY; _ % YR TTL; y t !DEC: -OTAL; $0 0%;MAR: YR 3 0 OCT: 19970 ) NOV : 0 (0 JAN; iFEBt 0 (BEP: 0 0 MAY 0 JUAt 0 ;JUL: p ( APR: i _E - ~i_ - proof- 0 !V V, FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): 'SOURCE: XXXXXXXX ;Ruth & Unauth &; I SOURCE: Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; certificate ; Operating Aid in TOTAL. Revenue Const Grant YR GO Bond ,CO Bond GO Bond 'of obligation, $0 $O ° $78 N1995 _ $0 ' $0 $78 a0 $p 0 0 5920 0 0 692 1 0' 0 p 0 1996 0 1 0 p) p 1997 i~ - i 50 $0 3670 7$e $p ) $0 I)roof 0,44 TTLS: T _$p i _ _==°»=i==a_~sa-_- ;-=»===as»-_ar»=== - NOTE: ATTiCH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION, 254 { k. (.I Ader:..la } .4 c 4 tWW ! r, j CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 27-Mar-91 DATE i PROJECT DETAIL 1095 PROJECT TITLE: West Winusor Dr. Pav and Drain PROJECT q: 0010-82 ar *A****Thousand Month Year TTL EST CAPITAL. COST; EST START DATE: JAN 1995 TTL EST 1st YEAR 0&M COST: 0 Thousand l TTL EST ANNUAL ONM COST; 0 Thousand EST COMPI. DATE: SEPT 1996 1, BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add 2 additional lanes to Widsor Drive and rebuild existing lanes between Hinkle Dr. & Bonnie Brae, Includes landscaped median & sidewalk, j II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: Improve traffic circulation and pedestrian access around North Lakes Park PROJECT BUDGET {Dollars to Nearest Thousand}; Post-Completion SEPT 1996 Est Capital - - Project ; Est lst Yr F.-3t Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of ; 0 & M Oper/Maim Oper/Maint COST Curr S Infl $ Total COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr S [nfl $ Services ~ $230 5267 10% ! Personal Serv: $0 $0 Land/ROW: 0 0 0% ; Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 11860 2,455 81% ; Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 i { Equipment: 215 258 9% Services: 0 0" 0 0 0th 1: XXXX,XXX 0 0 0% Oth 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 Orh 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; 0th 2. XXXXXY 0 0 0 0 } TOTAL (Thous): N$2,305--$2,980- 100% TOTAL (Thous); $0 $0 $0 $0 f proof- 0 IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest 'Thousand); E YR It 1995 YR TOTAL: $216 % YR TTL: 7% OCT: 0 iNOV; 0 !DEC: 0 iJAN: 24 !FEB: 48 )MAR: 48 APR: 18 iMAY: 24 !JUN: 24 :JUL: 0 1AUO: 0 :SEP: 0 TTL: 03% 1'R 2t 1996 YR TOTAL; $2,784 % YR OCT! 205 :NOV: 205 !DFC: 206 )JAN: 205 !FEB: 205 !MAR: 205 APR; 205 :MAY: 205 :JUN; 205 :JUL: 205 1AUG: 205 !S£P: 509 YR 33: 1997 YR TOTAL: SO % YR TTL: 0% OCT: 0 !Novi 0 :DEC: 0 )JAN: 0 !FEB: 0 !HEIR; 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 AN: 0 !JUL: 0 !AUG: 0 !SEP! 0 ----.~_.r proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dol:srs to Nearest Thousand): ;.Muth & Unauth ! !SOURCE: XXXXXXXX; Sold !Unsold Unsold ! Certificate ! Operating ! Aid in ! YEAR YR GO Bond !GO Bond 00 Bond !of Obligation! Revenue I Conat Grant I TOTAL g0 ' $0 $0 ! 2788 1995 $0 ! $0 $216 ! $0 I 1996 0 I 0 2116.1 ! 0! 0 I O D; 0 1997 0 1 0 0 1'TLS: 4p 1 ' $0 $2,980 ! $0 ! a so $2.080 - a..««--ay-- I. proof. G. ~ NOTE; ATTACH SITE ?LAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION, 255 1 IAN F1:tl I ~ CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 03-Apr-91 DATE i PROJECT DETAIL *w*##*#***#3#***###***#*#**#****##***###*####*##**#*#***#*###*PROJECT *k**#*##0010-63*1E1995 PROJECT TITLE: South Bonnie Brae Pav & Drain Month Year TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $2,064 Thousand F1'L FIST 1st YEAR 0.4!1 COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: JAN 1997 TTG EST ANNUAL O&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: MAR i I, BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: rainage4) Project street with ecbetween FM gutter, 1515 and sidewalk side), PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: Provide much needed repair to badly damaged street and improve access m schools and homes in the area while solving an ongoing drainage problem Post-Completion III, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): MAR 1997 Est Capital Est Ist Yr Est Annual Project 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Matnt CAPITAL Expenditure COST Curr Total COST Curr $ [nfl $ Curr $ Infl $ 5 Infl S ; _ _v $0 SO - Ser; SO 80 0 0 0 0 Services: $1671 5191 Personal Land/ROW: 50 54 3% supplies: 0 0 Maintenance, 0 00 0 0 Construction: 1,370 1,8160 86% 0% Services: Equipment: 0% ; 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 oth 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0th 2; XXXXXXX Q 0 0% 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 I ' TOTAL (Thous): $0 $0 SO SU T0T1L (Thous): 51,593 $2064 100% I saoaaaaaaaesaraa .~.osgz~CA.^»~cez L • proof 0 i. 1V, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): % YR TTL: 10% ~ TR 1: 1396 YP TOTAL: 5203 ~ 1 0 'JAN: 17 lFEB: 34 , )MAR: 3.1 : OCT: 0 lNOV: 0 ,DEC: , L5 :SEP: Q APR: 34 )MAY: 17 )JUN: 17 ,JUL: 2.,6 ,AUG: I I 1'R 2: YR 'TOTAL: $1,300 % YR TTL: 1996 ~ . OCT: 0 :Nov: 0 !DEC: 100 !JAN: 100 :FEB: 100 lMAR: 100 160 )SAP: 160 APR: 100 1MAYt 160 IJUN: 160 :JUL: 160 :AUG: 1'R 3; 107 YR TOTW $661 % YR TTL: 27% W 6l ` OCT: 100 !NOV: 100 lDEC: 100 IJAN: 100 IFEB: 100 ,MAR, APR; 0 MAY: 0 0 IJUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 !,SEP: 0 i... i l )JUN: 1', FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): !SOURCE: XXXXXXXX! ;Ruth & Unauth Sold !Unsold Unsold 1 Certificate ; Operating ! Aid in ! YEAR 1'R GO Bond ;GO Bond 00 Bond !of Obligation ! Revenue ! Const Grant I TOTAL so so i S20.9 0 0 ! 000 1993 $O ! $0 $203 ! $O ! 0 ! 1996 0 ! 0 11300 , ! 0 0 v01 561 ' Q 0 i 1397 0 , 0 ~ $2,06) - SO ! TTLS; $0 : SO 32,064 ! _ SO -_an___ -_a=~= arocf -0,01 NOTE: ATTACR SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES ).AND, ROW, OR CONSTRL'CTION~ 256 f V>',SYlrE~AA CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 03-Apr-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL I PROJECT TITLE: Mayhiil Rd. Pat' & Drain Phase 1 PROJECT OMo(nth4 Y1995 ear TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $4,126 Thousand TTL EST 1st YEAR O&M COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: JAN 1995 ITL EST ANNUAL O&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPI. DATE: SEPT 1997 t #t#####################################################****i#**iii:k**4**##kMMc#**'##M*##*##k*1, BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide 45 foot street between US 380 & McKinney with sidewalk one side, drainage, bridge at Cooper Creek, and turn lanes at 380 and McKinney II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: Provide safe and easy access to areas of Denton east of and along )tayhill Rd, Address traffic safety issue at Mlnyhill and McKinney, 111, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completlon Est Capital SEPT 1997 Fro,ject ; ~Eet, 1st Yr Est Annual r/Mai `COSTAL CuvrpgndiInfI S Total ; OC'OST CurreS/Malnfl $ Curr1E$ InfltS Personal Serv: $0 $0 $0 $0 Services: - $308 $410- lOX Land/ROW: 100 162 4% I Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Construct 916 3 0849 85% ; Maintenance: ion: 2,i Equipment; 0 0 OX , Services, 0 0 0 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% Oth 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 I I TOTAI, (Thous): y$3,424^^$4,426_ 100% i TOTAL (Thous)'$0$0 S0 SO t _ SC CC ~C CtlC-c❑ ~proof. ^0 s ' ,I , , FUNDING REQUIREMENTS r(Dollars to Nearest o Thousand)' l _ YR 1' 1995 YR TOTAL( $294 % YR TTL: 7% - OCT: 0 INOV; 0 :DEC: 0 :JAN: 21 IFEB: 21 iMAR: 21 APR: 21 NAY; 42 :JUN: 42 'JUL: 42 IAUG: 42 ISEP: 42 : l,R 2: 19~J6 YR TOTAL: $1,442 % YR TTL: 33% OCT: 21 :Nov: 21 ;DEC: 75 :JAN: 75 :FEB: 15 ;MAR: 75 APR: 0 (MAY: 220 IJUN: 220 'JUL: 220 :AUG: 220 ISEP: 220 }'R 3:~ 1997 1': TOTAL: $2,690 % YR T11: 61% OCT: 220 IN= 220 ',DEC: 220 (JAN: 220 IFEB: 220 IMAR: 220 APR: 220 i14AY: 220 IJUN: 220 {JUL: 220 !AUG: 220 SEP: 210 proof. 0 I', FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): IAuth & Unauth &I I SOURCE: XXXXXXXXI Sold (Unsold Unsold I Certificate i Operating I Aid In i YEAR YR GO Bond IGO Bond GO Bond Iof Obligation I Revenue i Const Grant L TOTAL ..o 1995 SO I 30 $291 I so $0 $00 S00 1142 1996 0 0 11142 2190 1997 0 I 0 21690 I 0 I 0 0 0' TTLS: $0 I $0 $4,426 , $o I so proof -0,.1 \OTE: yATTAC11 SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 257 T" CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 03-Apr-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL **x~M*****#**x**.+***:k********#***************~***~*************#*******~***~**ORCN-NO*1'EAR* PR03ECT TITLE: Mayhill Rd, Pav& Drain Phase 2 PROJECT 0010-65 1995 TTI. EST CAPITAL COST: $3,339 Thousand Month Year TTL iST IsL YEAR 001 COST; 0 Thousand ESP START DATE: JAN 1995 TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: 0 Thotsand EST COMPL DATE: FEB 1997 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTIO11: Provide •13 foot street between 'McKinney and Spencer Rd including sidewalk one side, bridge at Pecan Creel;, drainage, and turn lanes. II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: Provide safe and easy access Co areas east and along Maybill Rd. Address LraffLc safety issue at McKinney St. I[I. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand); Post-Completion Est Capital FEB 1997 Project Est Ist Yr Est Annuat CAPITAL Expenditure % of ; 0 & N Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Inf1 $ Total COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr $ Infl $ S-?rvicet: $269 $312 10% Personal Serv: $0 $0 $0 _ $0 j Land/ROM': 100 108 4% ; Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 21211 2,919 86% ; Haiutenance: 0 0 0 0 ' LyuIpment: 0 0 0% ; Services: 0 0 0 0 oth 1: XXXXYX.N 0 0 0% ; 0th 1: XXRxxxx 0 0 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous): 82,580 $3,339 100% TOTAL (Thous): $0 $0 $0 $0 proof 0 IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Y'R 1: 1995 YR TOTAL: $252TW % YR TTL: 8% OCT: O ;NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 21 ;FEB: 42 ;MAR: 42 APR: 12 ;MAY: 21 ;JL'N: 21 ;JUL: 21 ;AUG: 21 ISEP: 21 YR 2: 1936 YR TOTAL: $1,850 % YR TTL: 55% 50 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 ;FEB: 0 MAR: 250 OCT: 50 !NOV: APR: 250 ;KAY; 250 :JUN: 250 ;JUL: 260 ;AUG: 250 ;SEP: 250 1'R 3. 1937 YR TOTAL $1,237 % YR TTL: 37% OCT: 270 ;N'OV: 250 !DEC: 250 :JAN: 250 ;FEB: 237 ;MAR: 0 APR: 01?LAY: 0 )JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 ;SEP: 0 proof 0 L C. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): ;Ruth & Unauth &I )SOURCE: XXXXXXXX; Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; Certificate ; Operating I Aid in ; YEAR YR GO Bond ;GO Bond GO Bond ;of Obligation ; Revenue ; Const Grant I TOTAL 1995 $0 $0 $252 ; $0 ; $0 $0 s0 I $252 1996 0 0 1,850 0; 0 0 0 18:iU 1997 0 0 11237 0 0 0 0 1237 TT'LS; $0 ; $0 $3,339 - GO $0 I $0 $0 $3,339 proof 0,44 NOTE: -ATTACH SITE }LAP IFrPROJECT -INCLUDES -LAND, ROM', OR CONSTRUCTION, 258 i 1 i; r. CM OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAY 03-Apr-91 DATE i PROJECC DETAIL PROJECT TITLE: Mayhiil Rd, Pav & Drain Phase 3 PROJECT 0010-66 1995 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $2,42.1 Thousand Month Year TTL EST 1st %EAR O&M COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: JAN 1995 TTL EST ANNUAL O&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COM M DATE: DEC 1997 'kM'K##k*:k$##**#**i#*i###k##*######7~#*#*####k4###***#~#*#k*##############***##'##*#'R#####t*#'k###k 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proci.de 15 foot street between Spencer Rd, and Colorado Blvd, including drainage and sidewalk on one side, II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: Provide safe and easy access to areas east and along Mayhill Rd. ill replace unsafe railroad crossing, 111, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital DEC 1997 Proiect Est 1st Yr Est Annualy CAPITAL Expenditure % of 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maim COST Curr $ Infl S Total ; COST Curr $ Infl S Curr S Infl $ _,1 Services; $95 $226 10% X Personal Serv: $0 _ 50 SO SO , Laud/ROW: 100 108 5% Supplles: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 10583 2,090 84% Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 OX Services: 0 0 0 0 } 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% 0th 2: XXXXX%X 0 0 0 0 I TOTAL (Thous): 51,898~S2,424 100% i TOTAL (Thous): $0 $0 $0 $0 ' P proof 0 w H. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): 1'R 1: 1993 Y'R TOTAL: $280 % YR TTL:-- -12% OCT: 0 :NOV: 0 )DEC: 0 ;JAN: 18 ;FEB: 18 ;MAR: 18 APR: 36 ;MAY: 36 MIN: 36 ;JUL: 18 ;AUG: 50 (SEP: 50 , }'R 2: 1996 1'R TOTAL: $1,620 % YR TTL: 67% OCT: 0 ;NOV 0 )DEC: 0 JJAN: 180 iFEB: 180 ),MAR: 180 I APR: 180 ;MAY; 180 ;JUN: 180 ;JUL 180 ;AUG: 180 :SEP: 180 YR 3:u _ 1991 YR TOTAL: $524 % YR TTL: 22% OCT : 180 50Vr 180 ;DEC: 164 ;JAN; 0 iFEB: 0 ;MAR: 0 APR: 0 )MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 )AUG: 0 ;SEPI 0 proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES {Dollars to Nearest Thousand): )Ruth & Unauth &; ;SOURCE: XXXXXXXX Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; Certificate Operating Aid in ; YEAR YR GO Bond ;GO Bond GO Bond )of Obligation Revenue ; Const Grant ; TOTAL 1995 SO SO 5260 ; $0 $0 $0 ~$0 $230 1996 0 0 1,620 J 0. 0 0 1620 1997 0) 0 52.1 ) 0 0 i 0 0) 521 I I y TTLS: SO SO $21,124 $0 $0 ; $0 SO ; 1,124 j •_=eu=ai==c_=vns~n=roc=;=======0====~"_')=='=-,n==an)°=='=___°^==_ proof 0,21 NOTE; ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION, 259 t ' F.'AK3'i4 i CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 03-Apr-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL Mnsch Branch Rd, Phase 4 PROJECT q: 0010-67 1995 PROJECT TITLE: TTL ES'" CAPITAL COST: $2,916 Thousand Month Year TTL EST 1st YEAR 001 COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE; JAN 1995 TTL EST ANNUAL 00: COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE; DEC 1097 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide 27 foot road between Springside Rd. and FM 2449 with curl) and gutter, bridge at. Hickory Creek, and drainage. _ I It. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE; Complete link between Hwy 380 and FM 2449, Ease traffic congestion at FM 1515 and Bonnie Brae. Ill. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand); post-Completion Est Capital DEC 1997 Project i Est 1st Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/,Naint COST Curr $ Iuf1 $ Total ; COST Curr $ Intl $ Curr $ Intl S I Services: $230 $267 10% ; Personal Serv: M $0 J $0 $0 $U Land/ROW; 345 373 15% ; Supplies: 0 0 0 0 I Construction: 11725 2,277 75% Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 0% ; Services: 0 0 0 U 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 O% 0th 1; XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 2; XXXXXXX 0 0 O% ; Oth 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous): S2,300 $2,916 100% ; TOTAL (Thous) : $0 $0 $0 $0 t,. ===n===n=cn=~==c ' .e_on__n=aa,===~ r=r.ere~ra=«=x proof 0 IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR 1: 1995 YR TOTAL; $489 % YR TTL: 17% OCT: 0 ;NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 21 :FEB: 42 ;MAR: 42 .APR: 42 ;MAY; 21 ;JUN: 21 ;JUL, 114 ;AUG: 93 ;SEP: 93 YR 2; 1996 YR TOTAL: S1,800 % YR TTL: 62% OCT: 0 ;NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 200 ;FEB: 200 MAR: 200 :APR: 200 ;MAY: 200 ;JUN: 200 :JUL: 200 ;AUG: 20.i ;SEP: 200 YR 3: 1997 YR TOTAL: $627 % YR TTL: 21X OCT: 200 ;NOV: 200 ;DEC: 227 ;JAN: 0 ;FEB: 0 ;MAR: 0 APR; 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 ;JUL; 0 ;AUG: 0 ;SEP: 0 proof 0 V. FUNDING 'IOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): ;Ruth & Unauth k; ; ;SOURCE: %XXXXXXX; Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; Certificate ; Operating ; Aid in ; YEAR 1'k GO Bond ;GO Bond GO Bond ;of Obligation ; Revenue ; Const Grant ; TOTAL 1 I I I I 1996 $0 ; so $489 ; s0 ; $0 ; $0 $0 ; $489 1996 0; 0 1,800 0 0 0 0; 1800 j 1997 0; 0 627 ; 0; 0; 0 0; 627 I I I I I . j TTLS: _ $0 ; $0 $2,916 ; $0 ; so ; s0 ~$0 ; $2,916 roof -0,4 NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. '260 i i - CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 27-Mar-91 DATE j _ PROJECT DETAIL ****xe*****x**x**x***xxxxx*xx*x*x*xx**xx*a*x**xx***xxx**xx**x*x****x**x*x*xORON-NOxYEAR* PROJECT TITLE: Riney Road Pav and Drain PROJECT q: 0010-72 1995 TTL EST CAPITAL COS1: $224 Thousand Month Year TTL EST 1st YEAR 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: AUG 1995 TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: JAN 1996 x*L**x**xxxL O&M**xxx*xxx**x**x**** *****#*xxxx*****#**x****x*** *x###***#**xxx*xx*****> I. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide 41 root street between Windsor Dr, and Hwy 77 including sidewalk one one side and curb and gutter. II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: Upgrade access for Riney Road due to YMCA, city parks, Northridge subdivision and other institutional uses in the area. III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): - Post-Completion Est Capital JAN 1996 Project ; Est 1st Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Infl $ Total COST Curr Infl $ Curr $ Infl $ Services: $17 $20 10% Personal Serv: $0 $0 $0 $0 i Land/ROW: 0 0 0% Supplies. 0 0 0 0 { Construction; 155 205 90% ; Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 0% Services; 0 0 0 0 Oth 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous): $172 $224 100% TOTAL (Thous); $O $0 $0 $0 1 proof 0 I IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR 1; 1995 YR TOTAL: $224 % YR TIL: 100% OCT. 4 ;NOV: 4 ;DEC: 4 ;JAN: 4 :FEB: 0 ;MAR; 0 APR; Si ;MAY: 51 ;JUN: 52 ;JUL: 52 ;AUG: 2 :SEP: b -~YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% YR 2; 1998 0 JAN: 0 'FEB: 0 ;MAR: 0 ~ : OCT: 0 ,NOV. DEC APR: 0 ,SEP: 0 I ' 0 ;MAY: O ;JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 ;AUG: ~ I YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: YR 3; 1997 Oz OCT: 0 :NOV; 0 ,DEC; 0 ,JAN: 0 iFEB: 0 ;MAR: 0 APR' 0 :MAY: 0 :JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 SEP: 0 proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Auth & Unauth &; SOURCE: XXXXXXXX; Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; Certificate ; Operating ; Aid in ; YEAR YR GO Bond ;00 Band GO Bond ;of Obligation; Revenue ; Const Grant ; TOTAL I _ 24 1995 $0 $0 $224 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $2 0 1998 0 0 0 ll 0; 00 'I d p 0 1997 0 0 0 0 ' - I TTLS: $0 $0 $224 $0 $0 $0 f$0 $224 proof -0.32 NOTE: -ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 'lb 1 1 uArv' j ' I 27-Mar-91 DATE CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT DETAIL ***************~:********k************************************RUJECT*~****a*0010-70*1F1.995 , PROJECT TITLE: Masch Branch Rd. Phase 1 Month Year TTL EST CAPITAL COST: 8735 Thousand 1995 0 Thousand EST START DATE: AUG TTL EST 1st 0 0&,i COST: TTL F.S9 ANNUAL , 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: JAN 1996 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide 27 foot road between Hwy 380 and Jim Christal Rd. including drainage and curb and gutter, i._ i Ii, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: Provide improved access to ,480 from industrial area around the airport, III, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post°Co,jpletion JAN 1996 Est Capital _ Est 1st Yr Est Annual , Project 0 & M Oper/Maim Oper/Maim CAPITAL Expenditure % of COST Curr $ Infl $ Total COST <;urr $ lnfl $ Curr $ Infl $ $0 $0 SO $0 Personal Sery; ' Services: ~ $57 $66 Per Supplies: 0 0 U 0 Land/ROW: 50 64 9% ! 0 0 U Construction: 466 615 81% I Maintenance: O 0 0 0 0 0% Services: 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0% ; 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0% 0th 2: XXXXXXX D b 0 O Oth 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 (Thous): $O $0 $O so TOTAL (Thous): $673 $735- 100% TOTAL proof- 0 IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): 1095 YR TOTAL: $316 % YR TTL: 43% YR ' OCT: 8 lNOV: 8 ;DEC: 8 JAN: 8 IFEB: 8 (MAR: 8 i._ ism 70 APR: 8 ,MAY: 25 IJUN: 26 ,JUL: 69 ;AUG: 70 ,SEP: --70 - % YR TTL: 1'R 2: 1996 YR TOTAL: $413 70 ;MAR: 69 70 ,JAN: 70 ,FEB. 0 " , OC: r0 0 I ,MAY; 0 :DEC; ;JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 ,AUG: 0 'SEP: APR: 5'R 3: x1997 YR TOTAL: ! $0 % YR TTL: 0 (MAR: 0 OCT: 0 :Nov: 0 !DEC: 0 ,JAN: 0 ,FEB: 0 !SEP: 0 APR: 0 !MAY: 0 !JUN: 0 !JUL: 0 1AUO: proof , V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand)-. !SOURCE.: XXXXXXXX! !Ruth & Unauth &I ! Sold !Unsold Unsold I Certificate ! Operating I Aid In ' YEAR I YR GO Bond !GO Bond GO Bond of Obligation! Revenue ! Const Grant TOTAL 0 $0 !1 $o 8316 316 $ -1 _ $0 SO ~ ! 995 $ i ! 0 0 0.. 1996 0! 0 410 0 0 0 0 0 0 419' 1997 0 ! 0 $735 0 ' $0 ! TTLS: SO ! $O $735 $0 $0 oaa==o=ce proof -0.24 -_i NOTE: -ATTACH SITE NAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 262 i 1'. A l _ CiFl' OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 03-Apr-91 DATE ( PROJECT DETAIL *axx**~**************:k*****************.********************.********~:**********ORGN-NO*1'EAR* PROJECT TITLE; Masch Branch Rd. Phase 2 PROJECT k: 0010-74 1995 rTL EST CAPITAL COST: 51,915 Thousand Month Year TTL EST 1st. YEAR 0,01 COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE; AUG 1995 TTL EST ANNUAL 001 COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE; JAN 1996 I'. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide 27 foot street hetween F!1 1310 and Jim Christal Rd, including curb and gutter and drainage. Existing bridges will be utilized. M 11. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: (mprose access to 380 from industrial area around airport. ? 111. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars Lo Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion EsL Capital _ JAN 1996 f Project ; Est lst Yr Est Annual -j CAPITAL Expenditure % or 0 & M Oper/Maint. Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Infl S 'Fatal ; COST Corr $ Intl $ Curr $ Infl $ f Servi.cest 5100 $17I 10% Personal Serv: $0 $0 $0 $6- J Land/ROW: 200 216 13% Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 1,155 1,523 77% Maintenance, 0 0 0 U I Equipment: 0 0 0% ; Services: 0 0 0 0 I 0th l: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ! 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 J Oth 2: XXXXXXX 0 D 0% ; 0th 2: BXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous); $1,505 $1015 100% TOTAL (Thous): $0 $0 $0 $0 proof 0 I w~ IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand); 1'R 1; 1995 YR TOTAL; $422 % YR TTL: 22% 0CT; 13 l\OP: 15 ;DEC: 15 ;JAN; 15 IFEB; 15 ;MAR: 15 f APR: 15 ;MAY: 15 ;JUN: 15 :JUL: 100 lAUG: 100 ;SEP: 87 1'R 2: 1996 _-_-_.--YR TOTAL: S i , 055 % YR TTL: 55X1- - OCT: 87 :NON 88 ;DEC: 88 lJAN: 88 ;FEB: 88 lMAR: 88 APR: 88 ;MAY 88 ;JUN: 88 ;JUL: 88 !AUG: 88 ;SEP: 88 1 _ 1 . I _ 1 1'R 3; 1997 YR SuIAL: $438 % YR TTL: 23% CT: 88 ;NON: 88 lDEC: 88 lJAN: 87 ;FEB: 87 ;MAR: 0 APR: 0 :MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 :JUL: 0 !AUG: 0 :SEP: 0 proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest 'thousand): Auth & Unauth !SOURCE: XXXXXXXX! Sold !Unsold Unsold ! Certificate ! Operating ! Aid in YEAR YR GO Bond !GO Bond GO Bond !of Obligation Revenue ! Const Grant ; TOTAL 1995 SO ; $0 $422 ! $0 ! $0 ! $0 $0 ; $422 1996 0! 0 1,055 ! 0! 0! U 0 1055 1997 0! 0 .138 0 0! 0 0! 438 TTLS; $0 ! $0 $1,915 ! s0 ! SO ; $0 so S1 1'31,5 --------l---------------- l---------_ proof 0.4 - - NOTE: ATTACH-SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 263 27-Mar-91 DATE CITY OF DEN70N CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 3 ( PROJECT DETAIL 19* *****r**********w******t*********s*************t***************************O10 *YE195 PROJECT kr 0010-15 Year , Month ,asch Branch Rd Phase 3 AUG 1995 PROJECT TITLE: *****Thousand EST START DATE: 1996 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: JAN TTL EST Ist YEAR 001 COST; 0 Thousand *********************t.*********************~****************************************~***a TTL EST AN\CAI. 0&K COOT* I. BRIEF PROJECT UESCRIPTION 27 foot road between FM 1515 and Springside Rd. including t r'•, Provide curb nod gutter and drainage' iI PkOJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: estion at 1515 and Bonnie Drae by providing .Alliriate traffic Conq a link I t}~, -35 to the sou Post-Completion Nearest Thousand): JAN 1996 to 110.r5 al IFI, PROJECT BUDGET DOital Est 1st Yc• Est Annu . Est "ap Oper/Maint Project 0 & M OPer/Malnt Curr $ Infl 5 Expenditure of COST lurr $ lnfl $ CAPITAL fl $ Total i - " COST Curr $ In $0 $0 $110 $128 10% Personal Segv: $0 0 0 0 Services: 27% Supplies: 0 0 0 0 300 324 Maintenance: 0 0 0 r Land/Row: 690 911 63.. 0 0 0 Construction: 0 0% Services: 0 0 . 0th 1: XXXX%X% © 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 0% 0 (,,.h 1: XXXXXXX 0 0% 0th 21 XXXXXXX _r 0th 2: X%XXX7+X - $0 $0 $0 I;. 1001 TOTAL (Thous): - TOTAL (Thous)' $1,100 ; proof 1V. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): - % YR TTI : 12 Vft TOTAL: $ 12 ;MAR! 41 12 jrEB: 1995 YR 1: 12 )DEC: 12 !JNt t 150 iAUG: 150 iSEP: 79 OCT; 12 !Nov: 'JUN: 12 ,JUL i~.-------'.' APR: 12 )MAY; 12 i _.i~__-.--__i_ 6 L % YR TTL: Bl „ I TOTAL: $B75 80 ;MAR: YR 2. 1996 79 )DEC: 80 JAN: 19 iAUG: 79 isEP: 0 19 !NOV, 79 IJUL: - OCT: 80 JUN; APR: AO MAY YR TTt: 0%fMAR: O YR TOTAL: $0 0 )F'EB: SEP' YR 3: 1990 ',NOVt 0 )DEC: 0 i JAN: 0 iAUG: 0 ' OCT: 0 ;JUN: 0 ,JUL; ' , APR: 0 ;MAY: i~-- - i of0- - ~T - SOURCE; XXXXXXXXi YEAR V FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest ThousandJ: in ' I , TOTAL )Auth & Unauth &; Certificate ; Operating Aid Sold ;Unsold Unsold ' Revenue ) Const Grant l Bond GO Bond of Obligation; , --$A$7 YR GO Bond , :GO $0_ $0 11 _ so) $o ) B75 I _0 -$G $4B7 i 0 i G I 0 o 0 j 0 1995 $0 0 675 D ; 0 _ 1996 0 ' 0 0 0 ' $0 ' 51,362 1991 0 i $1, J ' $D-- - $O",ameee:e~s===~_s_~ proof "0.1 362 ' TTLS: ~-$0 i , - ° ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. NOTE: -ATTACK SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLU 264 LAND, i 1 41 1 (s,rF'GtiYJ~ t All):?iX ~I i CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 27-Mar-91 DATE E PROJECT DETAIL ***:~*************a:**>k******************************************************ORGli-NO*1'EAR* PROJECT TITLE: South East Denton Sidewalks PROJECT 0010-76 1995 E TTL EST CAPITAL CJST: £104 Thousand Month Year j TTL EST 1st YEAR 001 COST; 0 Thousand EST START DATE; AUG 1995 ( TFL EST ANNUAL 00f COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: JAN 1996 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION; Provide sideNalk on one side of Morse St. (Robertson to Woodrow), Duncan St Olorse to Willow Springs), Kerley St. (Duncan to Shady Oaks). 11, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: ` Provide a system of pedestrian access In SE Benton along major streets. E;isting Paths indicate heavy usage. M III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand); Post-Cowpletion , Est Capital _ JAN 1996 y Project Est 1st Yr Est Annual i CAPITAL Expenditure X of 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint ? COST Curr $ Infl $ Total ' COST Curr £ Infl $ Curr S Infll $ " Services $8 S9 10% ; Personal Serv; $0 - $0 $0 $0 Land/ROW; 2 2 3% ; Supplies; 0 0 0 0 's Construction: 70 92 88% ; Maintenance; 0 0 0 0 ! I r=~ EiuIpment: 0 0 0% ; Servicesi 0 0. 0 0) - 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; Oth 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 1 0th 2; XXXXXXX 0 0 OX ; 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 Z TOTAL ;Thous); $80 $104 100% ; TOTAL (Thous) ; $0 $0 $0 $0 proof -0 ' IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand); „ yR 1; 1995 YR TOTAL: $104 % YR TTL; 100% I OCr; 2 :NOV: 2 !DEC; 2 !JAN: 2 ;FED; 0 ;MAR; 24 »a APR: 24 )hIAY; 24 :JUN: 24 ;JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 ,SEP: O YR 2: 1996 YR TOTAL; $0 % YR TTL; 0% „f OCT: 0 )NOV: 0 ;DEC; 0 ;JAN; 0 !FEB: 0 ;MAR; 0 APJ1; 0 ;MAY: 0 )JUN: 0 !JUL. 0 :AUG; 0 !SEP. '0 1 YR 3; 1991 YR TOTAL; $0 YR TTL; O% OCT: 0 1NOV: 0 !DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 ;FEB; 0 iMAR: 0 APR; 0 !MAY: 0 )JUN: 0 1JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 (SEP: 0 proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): ;Ruth & Unauth C ;SOURCE; XXXXXXXX! Sold ;Unsold Unsold ! Certificate ; Operating 1 Aid in ; YEAR YR GO Bond !GO Bond GO Bond ;of Obligation; Revenue ; Const Grant ; TOTAL 1995- _ $0 $0 $104 ; $0 $0 ; $0 $0 ; $104 1996 0 0 0; 0; 0! 0 0! 0 1997 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0 TTLS: -r--'$0) SO 3104 ! -____$0 $0 ; $0 SO $104 proof 0.16 { NOTE; ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 265 rttK.Clx=t; G 1 1 , L I 1 f i i I i ' 9,66 V. 1991-96 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 20-dun-91 LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (ALL YEARS GROSS OPEH d TOTAL NET L REQUFSTTNO PRS~lECT fwwECT CAPITAL A!AlNT OR" CAPVTAL DEPT _NlMf8F3i -NAIAE COST COSTS COST COST PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1991-92: DRAINAGE' 0810-11 HOLLYHILULONGRIDGE DRAINAGE 292,000 0 282,000 292,000 DRAINAGE 0810-02 COOPER CRK CHANNEL PHASE 1 804,000 2,000 808,000 804,000 DRAINAGE 0810-03 PECAN CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMEN 349,000 2,000, 351,000 349,000: PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1992-93: DRAINAGE 0810-01 DOWNTOWN DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN 52,000 0 62,000 62,000 DRAINAGE 0810-04 AVENUEG DRAINAGE OUTFALL 139,000 1,060 144,000 139,000 DRAINAGE 0810-05 WILSON, MORSE, ALEXANDER DRAINAG 138,000 0 138,000 138,000 N DRAINAGE 0810-N COOPER CRK CHANNEL PHASE II 608,000 2,000 610,000 908,000 ol DRAINAGE 0610-07 PECAN CRK DRAIN NEAR ROBERTSON 607,000 0 607,000 607,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1993-94: I DRAINAGE 0810-0 PECAN CRK (KERLEY TO W000ROW) 1,395,000 3,000 1,398,000 1,396.000 DRAINAGE 0810-10 COOPER CRK CHANNEL PHASE it 643,DW 2,000 646,000 643,000 t OTHER PROJECTS SUBMITTED: DRAINAGE 0810-09 PECAN CRK (ALONG UNIVERISITY) 322,000 0 322,000 322,000 DRAINAGE 0610-12 $50WIA PARK DRAINAGE 1,041,000 0 1,041,000 1,041,000, DRAINAGE 0810-13 THUNDERBIRD DRAINAGE 84,000 0 84,000 84,000 DRAINAGE 0810-14 DANIELWFT WORTH DR DRAINAGE 330,000 0' woo 330,000 I 4 1 , k'Uti w F { r ~ PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 199142 f , i f 269 E i . t~ if 1 { CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 15-Apr-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL *s****##*ss#ss#****~#**ssssss*s*s#***#*sss*********s**s*as*#s*#s***~**#*#**ORGN-NO*YEAR~ PROJECT TITLE: HOLLYHILL/LONGRIDG.E DRAINAGE PROJECT q: 0810-11 1992 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $292 Thousand Month Year TTL EST 1st YEAR 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: JAN 1992 TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: SEPT 1992 **s#******##****#*#s#s#**#*s*#**********#***#*#*#**s*###*s#*s##s**ss#s#****>1#*#**#**s*#*** I. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE FOR THE OUTFALL SYSTEM ALONG LONGRIDGE FROM TEASLEY TO APPROXIMATELY HOLLYHILL 11. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: THE INITIAL CONSTRUCTION THAT PROVIDES THE OUTFALL WILL ELIMINATE THE WORST FLOODING AREAS WHILE PROVIDING A FOUNDATION TO ADD LATER SECONDARY SYSTEMS III, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post,-Completion Est Capital SEPT 1992 Project Est let Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of ; 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/14aint COST Curr $ Intl $ Total ; COST Curr $ Intl $ Curr $ Intl $ Services: $0 $0 0% ; Personal Serv: $0 $0 $0 $0 Land/ROW; 0 0 0% Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 270 292 100% Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 O% Services: 0 0 0 0 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% Oth 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous); $270 $292 100% TOTAL (Thous): $0 $0 $0 $0 f, ' --az:~cc_ «ooacz_~sl_e.~o-aaaoc proof 0 r.. IV. 'FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR 1: 1992 YR TOTAL: $292 X YR TTL: 100% OCT: 0 !NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 32 ;FEE: 32 ;MAR: 32 APR: 32 ;MAY: 32 ;JUN: 32 )JUL: 32 ;AUG: 32 ;SEP: 36 1 I YR 2: 1993 YR (TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% OCT: 0 !NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 ;PED: 0 ;MAR: 0 APR: O ,MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 )JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 ;SEP: 0 I r 1 I , YR 3: y004 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% 1 OCT: 0 ;NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 !FEB: 0 ;MAR: 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 ;AUO: 0 ;SEP: 0 1 1 1 ~ proof 0 V. FUNDING SOUk~;ES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): )Ruth & Unauth &; ; ;SOURCE: XXXXXXXX Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; Certificate ; Operating ) Aid in ; YEAR YR GO Bond )GO Bond GO Bond ;of Obligation; Revenue ; Const Grant TOTAL ' I I I I I 1992 $0 $292 $0 ) $0 J~ $0 , $0 s0 $2924 1993 0, 0 0, 0, 0, 0 0 0 1994 0, 0 0, 0, 0 i 0 0, 0 TTLS: $0 $292 $0 ! $0 ; $0 ; $0 $0 ; $292 axaoTAoaae~~seaaxs~a~e:nanmis~raaaaaeaeac~e__ee5~aeeey~aeaa~gnanaeaa.a.e proof 0,4 NOTE: ATCH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 270 f r, .g KS DR, Ail VISTA \ d wtil ANMR w ti 6G DRDERRY o o 1 HOBS ON 'f L y RYAN RYAN )8! Or it 27 1 1 n t. ;I tz Y J CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 15-Apr-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL **t*****k***~#****##*#*t***t***t**#tt#tt##st#t#*#ttkt###*#*********#t#****tORON-NO*YEAR* PROJECT TITLE% COOPER CREEK CHANNEL PHASE I PROJECT 0: 0Month 2 Y1992 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $804 Thousand t TTL EST let YEAR 088 COST: 2 TThousand EST START DATE: AUG housand EST COMPL DATE: JAN 1999 TTL EST ANNUAL O&M COST: ear **k#t*#***tt##*######t####t*t##k###########*##tk###t#**##t#k#*ttk###t**###tk##tt#t###t##*# 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: IMPROVEMENTS THAT PROVIDE DEVELOP APLAN FOR O THAT CREEK ARE KNEAND CESSOITATED BY CHANNEL RECENT EVELOPMENT CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS 11. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE; REDUCE FLOODING IN ISOLATED AREAS AND CORRECT OVERTOPPING OF CULVERTS FROM MINGO RD. TO END OF PHASE I III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion JAN 1993 Est Capital Est let Yr Est Annual Project i 0 A M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint CAPITAL Expenditure X of i COST Curr f Intl $ Total COST Curr $ Intl $ Curr $ Intl S Services: $50 $50 7% Personal Serv: ~$0 $00 f00 f00 Land/ROW; 6 5 1% ; Supplies: 0 O 0 Construction: 670 724 89% Maintenance: 20 O 2 2 2 Equii Oth 1: ENO 0 25 26 0 0% 3X Services: e 1 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 1; EN Oth 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ! 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 y TOTAL (Thous): $750 $BU4 100% TOTAL (Thous); $2 $2 $2 $2 A_a__saaaaaas$2 aaazazc-ca=acs =._azzaaaasszzae , proof 0 IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR 1: 1992 YR TOTAL: $20 X YR TTL: 2% OCT: 0 lMOV: 0 )DEC: 0 !JAN: 0 IFEB; O (MAR: 0 APR: 0 MAY 0 ;JUN: 0 lJUL: 0 AG, 10 lSEP: 10 , 2; YR TOTAL : $674 % YR TTL( 71% YR 1993 OCT: 10 INOV1 10 IDEC: 14 IJAN: 60 :FEB: 60 )MAR: 60 APR: 60 !MAY: 60 1JUNI 60 1JUL: 60 1AU0: 60 {SEP: 60 YR TAL: $210 % YR TM 26% TO YR 3: 1994 0 OCT: 60 lNOVI 60 IDECI 90 ;JAN: 0 !FEB: 0 (MAR: 0 APR: 0 IMAYI 0 lJUNI 0 lJUL: 0 !AUG! 0 ISEP. u ! ! - l _ - ---I proof 0 - V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand)t lAuth & Unauth kI ! I80URCEI XXXXXXXX! , Sold (Unsold Unsold I Certificate I Operating I Aid in , YEAR YR GO bund !GU Bond GO Bond lot Obligation) Revenue I Const Grant ± TOTAL $2O 1992 $0 t f0 $20 I ; p 0 l $ p 574 ;d , ' $0 1993 0; 0 574 i 0 I 0 0! 674 1994 0 ! 0 210 0 ! ! $0 i~$0 $0 ! $804 TTLS: $0 0 I ! ! $0 $604 I azzeea:zlzsenznzsaa5aznzzlzzza.azssaasnlesxzzasttaaeaslsez_zxssaasaeam7z proof X0.2 NOTE: ATTAR-H SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW> OR CONSTRUCTION. 272 r I I I Aft to • --o r ~ ~ r J ~r if- Z~L 15 i' i. .ems#I • I 1 ,lam Y ~ i ~ r~~ ~ I ~I _aa ~1 ~1• III ' . mil IF II 15~~'a 273 'i i Y. ~z rsn " 1 15-Apr-91 DATE CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEME4T PLAN +r4 F PROJECT DETAIL 1992 tt*t*t**t**ett****ttt***at*t****t**r*tt**#t****t***************tt**t****t**O *YEAR year PECAN CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT k: M 0onth onth s PROJECT TITLE: $349 Thousand JUN 1992 TTL FST CAPITAL COST; 2 Thousand EST START DATES JAN 1993 TTL EST Let YEAR 06M COST: g Thousand EST COMPL DATE: TTL EST ANNUAL O&M COST: **t* I. ,~t** BRIEF **r*sst** PROJECT r***** DESCRIPTIONttt******t***t*tt*s***t*t*BETNEEN*BRADSHAW*t******t*t*t** THIS PROJECT WILL ESTABLISH CHANNEL LINING FOR PECAN CREEK ~i AND RUDD£LL, II, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: ELIMINATE EXIS ING EROSION0 AND MMPRDYEACAPACITYROYiDING A CONCRETE BOTTOM WITH SMALL sDF WALL Post-Completion _ 111, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): JAN 1993 let Yr Eat Annual Est Capital Eat , Dper/Mekint Project Opee/Maint Expenditure % of 0 8 M COST Curr Intl $ Curr t Intl $ CAPITAL r $ Intl E Total COST cur r $0 3T 0 0 $15 $15 Personal Serv: 0 0 0 Services: 0 0 0% ( Supplies: 2 2 2 2 Land/ROW! 300 324 92% ; Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 0 0 0% ; Services: 0 0 0 0 Equipment; 10 10 3% i 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th I: ENO 0 0 p% I 0th 2: XXXXXXX f $2 i 0th 2: XXXXXXX $2 $2 2 ~ 100% ' TOTAL (Thous): $2 at tae:m~sseoaa TOTAL (Thous): $325 $349_ i assaxt-sana_ea proof 0 11', FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): x YR TTL; YR TOTAL: $16 YR 1: 1992 0 IJAN: 0 IFEB: 4 0%I IMAR:SEP: 4 'DEC: OCT: 0 !NOV: 0 I, JUN: 4 'JULS 4 ,AUG: 0 IMAY: i APR: i - %yR - 82% TTL: _ _ ~'yR TOTAL: $W 20 i~ 20 YR 2: 1993 0 ;DEC: O IJAN: 26 IFEB: 31 18£?t 40 OCT; 4 INOVI : 20 IJUL; 20 IAUG; 20 ;MAY: 20 IJUN APRI ' 34% i 1 % YR TTL: ' YR TOTAL: $118 0 ;MART 0 YR 3-- 9 38 ;SAN: 0 1FEB: 0 SEP: 0 OCT: 40 INOV: 40 ~DECc 0 IJUL; O IAUG; , 0 ;MAY: 0 ,JUN: , O APR: , proof ,SOURCE: XXXXXXXXI YEAR V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): IAuth 6 Unauth &I i Operating I Aid In ' TOTAL 'Unsold Unsold , Certificate Const Grant I Bold P sold obligation! Revenue , YR GO Bond IGO Bond t10 Bond I I_ $0 $0 Ii E0 i 215 p 216 0 I 0 0 0 II 118 1902 $0 , _ 1993 0 1994 0 1 0 118 1 0 i $0 i 43$ g proof -0,2 TTLS: 0 i $0 $349 i~' ;~s~ t=aaana_asassgem assamax'Isaasemtamaznanxslsesnssms:an~tlecneeasan_ , CONSTRUCTION. NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES 27ND, ROW OR t II; ,rW 1 ' ~ ~ 4 1 1i Awn ~y i nr I 7', r .Jirc~~ E EEO i7 I~ II r L , p I k ~ 1 i. ~ IV a ~ s r '4 00 j .J 275 \ p j 1 1 j t i 276 f s E i y PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1992-93 277 r r, i F µ CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 15-Apr-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL **#*********##****##**###*##*##*************#*****#**#***#**#k******0 PROJECT 0810-01 1992 PROJECT TITLE; DOWNTOWN DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN Month Year ST 852 Thousand EST START DATE; APR 1992 TTL EST CAPITAL CO; 0 Thousand 1992 TTL EST 1st YEAR O&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE; DEC TTL EST ANNUAL O&M COST: 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: EFFECTS UTILIZE CONSULTINGSENGINEEZAToDEVELOTHEAWATERSHEDLANDFDEVELOPMENTR NESS DISTRICT It, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE; CREEK THIS PABLE POJWILL ECT ADDRESS THE FORETHE FUTURE. DEVELO III, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand); Post-Completion DEC 0^ ,2 Eat Capital Est 1st Yr Eat Annual Project i O & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint CAPITAL Expenditure % of COST Curr $ Intl 8 Curr Intl 8 COST Curr 8 Intl $ Total $51 $52 100% Persona- 1 Serv:~ S4 $0 to p Services: 0 0 0% Supplies; 0 0 Land/ROW: 0 0 OX Maintenance; 0 O 0 oth Construction! 1: ruction: xxzzzzx o 0 o O% Services: G 0 Equipment. 0 0% Oth 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0 O% ; 0th 2: XxXxxxx 0 G ° o 0th 2: XXXXXXx ~ 862 100% TOTAL (Thoue); 60 $0 f ass=aaaaaaam:-•- a_aaaa--caa=a- . TOTAL (Thous): 851 $ 60 ____ataaaazasaaa F -proof 0 IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR TTL: 69% YR I: 1992 YR TOTAL: $36 % 'FEE: 0 ;MAR; 0 APR: OCT: 0 6 .;NOVMAY:. 6 6 !DEC: ;3UN: S ;JUL: 6 ;AUG: 6 ;SEP; 6 ; ' 2 1993 --i_ %yR TTL: 31% ' YR TOTAL: 818 ~JAN: 0 !FEB: 0 iMAR: O YR OC 6 ',NAY: ,DEC: 4 , 0 ;AUG: 0 ;SEP: 0 APR, : 0 ;MAY: 0 0 JUN: 0 !JUL: ; i ' % YR ' YR ~TOTAL $O ' TTL: YRYR 99g4 0 ,JAN: 0 IFE$: OXMAR: U OCT: 0 !NOV; 0 iDECt 0 FEBi 0 1 9EPl 0 ;MAY; 0 ;JUN: G ;JUL. 1 APR; proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Auth Unauth &; ,SOURCE: XXXXXXXXi YEAR d Unsol Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; Certificate ; operating ; Aid in ' ~ !i YR GU Bond ;dd Bond GO Bond ;of obligation! Revenue Const Grant TOTAL ~ $0 ; $0 ; $O f0 , - 1992 80 $0 636 , 0 0 is 1993 0 0 16 , 0 p 0 0 i 0 1994 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 1...~---;---- -60 ~ 652 $0 , 80 $0 $52 $0 ' TTLS: $0 I 00290=99i OR CONSTRUCTION. aanee proof -0,02 NOTE; ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LA, ROW! i y ~ a '[1 FAIRLA9I. MOS DAINCETGN CT. 1---/\. g 1 CRfENBAPIR \ LRO55 ipR£S Y ACE S KR MAN WOODLAND I NC`II ` '1 ZI lY~ ~y7b .w~ 1~1_~J LL HWY. 380 aMHE~sf i ~ ?~1 fwu II GPrwuS rMCA U ~+ES~~ I i -y J AMR "FC ClI ~I lrOLl £GE 4E.fO4 !AAri R ♦ EME Y?dEJ10C l 51E~4EN'4R° ~-•7 r- - ~ MAO p ; N~ ~CR SCENi~_ 4" ~ l ORES NT L i _i _ I" d !0L ^N z I pE SC \ J EEO - i~ SCM L L r ~A m I I ~ Aw ER 1 ~ CHMif < r t ~ a O ~ FIRST ~ 11 ~~1 ^BaoAC~or ~t~J ` u I \ l Q TEXAS ~^T~~ 1 I \ ~ Z ~ u ON HERS aANHA4pLE J L-~ - \ D L EGAk~~ EGPN z ~pA,.} C R ]I G BARBER y z 0 e RARKYAf ~ ~ ~ ~~i ~ ANDERSON a ULAND PAP P K Apr tI GRACE ii'~1~J-11 I al AYE l.s*-•-.~ LJ~ C1A~ W. OAK 9~❑❑O C3 O OAM J ~ I HICKORY FJKl ICK P9 ERRS LJ ❑ UI F1 !l_.__.._J; RE b w o ~ ~ E, PRAIR m - cAwus pRA~Rf t' r „ " W cI t. O.FF w 1 H ML I j ! ~$f d"'~;! 279 c -`9 { 'l 7gi J CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 15-Apr-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL ##t###**#*ttttt*s#t**###s***###t#s**s##*#t##*s#***##ts#*s##t#*#st**#*******ORGN-NO*YEAR* PROJECT TITLE: AVENUE 0 DRAINAGE OUTFALL PROJECT M; 0810-04 1994 TTL EST CAPITAL COST; $139 Thousand Month Year w TTL FST lot YEAR 0&M COST; 1 Thousand EST START DATE; MAR 1994 TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: 1 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: DEC 1995 t#*sts####tt##*##ttt#*#st*###tt##s#**###*#s#tt#ta**#t##ts#t#*##***###tt*#t**###**#s#****ss I. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE THE OUTFALL SYSTEM FOR EXISTING DRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM AREAS AROUND OAK, HICKORY AND AVENUE E. II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: ALLOW THE STORM SEWERS DESIGNED WITH AVE E AND OAK, HICKORY TO FUNCT',ON AS DESIGNED WITH THE PROPERLY DESIGNED OUTFALL SYSTEM, III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital _ DEC 1995 Project ; Eut lot Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of ; 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Intl $ Total ; COST Curr S Intl $ Curr $ Intl S I Servicest $15 $16 13% ; Personal Serv: $0 $0 $o $0 Land/ROW: 0 0 0% Supplies; 0 0 0 0 Construction: 100 124 87% Maintenance; I 1 1 I Equipment: 0 0 0% ; Services: 0 0 0 0 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 O% 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 O% i 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 I r TOTAL (Thous): $115 $139 100% ; TOTAL (Thous): $1 $1 $1 $1 = -3e3tlee703G7.=L I 37e--77Se3~eee=efl .3e.-.y3,°.. ~.7 sae: -proof 0 IV, FUNDLNO REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR 1: 1994 YR TOTAL; $65 X YR TTL: 40% OCT: 0 !NOV: 0 IDEC: 0 ;JAN; 0 !FEB! 0 IMAR: 5 APR:. 5 IMAYI 6 IJUN: 0 !JUL: 0 IAUG; 20 !SEP: 20 YR 2: 1995 YR TOTAL: $84 % YR TTL: 60% OCT: 20 INOV: 28 IDEC: 36 :JAN; 0 IFEB: 0 iMAR; 0 APR: 0 1MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 1JULI 0 1AU01 0 1SEP 0 YR 31 1996 YN 1TOTALt $0 I % YR TTL: UX OCT : 0 : NOV ; 0 I DEC i 0 WAN: 0 Milt 0 ; MAR ; 0 - APR; 0 :MAY: 0 !JUN: 0 :JUL; 0 !AUG: 0 ISEP: 0 1 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): proof 0 ;Ruth & Unauth &I I 1SOURCE; XXXXXXXXI Sold (Unsold Unsold : Certificate I Operating I Aid in i YEAR YR GO Bond 100 Bond GO Bond lot Obligation) Revenue I Const Grant I TOTAL 1994 $0 1 $0 $55 1 $0 l $0 1 $0 $0 I $55 1995 0 1 0 84 l 0 1 0 i 0 0: 84 1996 0 l 0 I 0: 0 1 0 0: 0 TrLS: $0 1 $0 $139 i $0 I ` $0 I $0 $0 1 $139 aeenaeaal_esn:acae_sae=aalsensaaea_es:als~eaea«naeaalasaaesnsesaeemnan proof 0 NOTEt ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION, 280 s _ 1 I , ti r s I J vu L ,1 j ~ U 9• I~y;~ 61 ` i1 II! ILL/'I • , ~J Mr. !r0 1 .rr ue ~ 1 ~ L_~ if I I. 1140 w"Clamor W , ! FZ ~z (Q'~ ! ~ ~ / 4 281 y t 15-Apr-91 DATE CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT DETAIL *####***###*###*#*###***MORSE*ALERANDER* DRAINAGE *#**PROJECT#N*;#**#0810-05#YE1992 Year PROJECT TITLE: WILSON, $138 Thousand Month 1992 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: MAY TTL EST lat YEAR OEM COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: AUG 1992 TTL EST ANNUAL 05M COST: 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: TO CONSTRUCT A PIPE SYSTEM THROUGH FREDMOORE PARK AND INSTALL A CONCRETE BOTTOM IN THE EXISTING SWALE. ALSO, EXTEND SYSTEM TO NORTH AS DESIGNED ORIGINALLY II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: TO RECLAIM PARK LAND PRESENTLY USED AS A CHANNEL AND TO COMPLETE THE DRAINAGE III SYSTEM FOR TH13 AREA j 111. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion ets 1992 Est Capital Est 1st Yr, Est Annual Project ! 0 A M Oper/Maint Oper/Malnt CAPITAL, Expenditure % of COST Curr S Infl S Total COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr S Infl $ Services: $ O $0 0% ; Personal Serv: 500 So o $0 Land/ROW: 0 0 O% ! Supplies: 0 0 0 % Maintenance: O 0 0 0 Oth 1Const: Xruction:XXX%%X 1280 0 13~ 0 100 % services; th Equipment: O% 0th It XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 ' 0 1: 0 0 0% ; 0th 2; XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 Oth 2. XXXXXXX . TOTAL (Thous): $O $O $0 ` $0 TOTAL (Thous): 5128 $138 100% sv_oaa,e__za~-_e ! proof 0 IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand)t YR TOTAL: $138 % YR TTL: 100% YR It 1992 OCT: 0 !NOV: 0 IDEC: 0 IJAN: 0 !FEB' 0 !MAR: 0 APR: 0 lMAY: 30 ,JUN, 30 :JUL; 30 !AUG, 48 ,SEPt 0 TOTAL: $O X YR ThLc 0 YR 2: 1993 0 IJAN: 0 !FEB; 0 !MAR: ,AUG. 0 l : 0 APR: 6 ,MAY: 0 0 {,DECJUN: : 0 lJUL: 0 ~ ~ ! t_. ' 0 ' YR ~TOTAL: d X YR TTL: O% OC J- 0 ,NOV. 0 ;JAN: 0 MB: 0 ;MAR: OCTi ~ APR. 0 114AY: 0 'JUN: 0 IJUL: 0 1A110 4 iSEP' 0 proof 0 V, FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): SOURCE: XXXXXXXX! !Atith 3 Unauth &; ' Sold ;Unsold Unsold ! Certificate ; Operating ' Aid in YEAR ' TOTAL YR GO Bond ;GO Bond GO Band !of Obligation! Revenue ' Const Grant _ Q 1991 2 ---40 - S00 Slap i ;0 ! 0 ; 0 1 SO ! 0 993 0 , 0 , 0 _ ' 1994 0 0 0 0 ! ~so 5]38 " s proof -0.24 5138 ! TTLS: 0 SO ! $0 , S neasn~5emeasaaeetialeaeeeaesen=aamassa yaaaaselnsaaasaaesasreaW(szaanar NOTES ATTACH SITE MAP If PROJECT INCLUDES 1,z ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 3 I' ELI] I + -71 'I A f I ESE ILL LUL~ o" a CD L ILJLJ 4 ~ 283 o~~ see` La FI CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 15-Apr-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL - ###****s*#***###########*#**#*##*###*##*######*#*#**######*##*####*#***##**ORGN-NO#YEAR# PROJECT TITLE: COOPER CREEK CHANNEL PHASE II PROJECT N: 0810-06 1994 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $608 Thousand Month Year TTL EST tat YEAR 0&M COST: 2 Thousand EST START DATE: FEB 1994 TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST; 2 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: JUL 1995 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DEVELOP A PLAN FOR COOPER CREEK AND CONSTRUCT CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS THAT PROVIDE CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NECESSITATED BY RECENT DEVELOPMENT II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE; REDUCE FLOODING IN ISOLATED AREAS AND CORRECT OVERTOPPING OF CULVERTS FROM PHASE I TO END OF PHASE II III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand) Post-Completion Eat Capital JUL 1996 Project ; Eat tat Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of ; 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Intl E Total ; COST Curr $ Intl $ Curr 1 Intl $ Services: $35 $35 7% Personal Serv: $0 $0 $0 $0 Land/ROW: 5 5 t% ; Supplies; 0 0 0 0 Construction: 445 662 89% ; Maintenance: 2 2 2 2 Equipment: 0 0 0% ; Services: 0 0 0 0 - Oth 1: ENO 15 16 3% ; 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 O% ; 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous): $500 $608 100% TOTAL (Thous): $2 $2- $2 $2 r proof 0 f IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR 1: 1994 YR TOTAL: $44 % YR TTL: 7% OCT: 0 !NOV: 0 !DEC: 0 ,JAN: 0 IFEB: 5 ;MAR: O APR: 4 !MAY: 5 :JUN: 10 :JUL: 10 1AUG: 10 ISEP: 0 YR 2: 1996 YR TOTAL: $414 % YR TTL: 68% OCT: U !NOV. 0 IDEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 !FEB: 0 :MAR: 60 APR: 60 'MAY: 50 :JUN: 54 !JUL: 60 AG: 60 ISEP: 90 YR 3: 1996 r YR rTOTAL: $150 % YR TTL: 26% OCT: 6.0 :NOV: 60 IDEC: 60 'JAN: 0 'FEB: 0 IMAR: 0 APR: 0 'MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 :JUL: 0 lAUG: 0 ISEP: b ~ , r r V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): proof 0 IAuth & Jnauth &I I !SOURCE: XXXXXXXX Sold :Unsold Unsold I Certificate I Operating I Aid in ! YEAR YR GO Band !GO Band 30 Bond lot Obligation; Revenue ' Const Grant I TOTAL 1994 $0 i $0 $44 I $0 ' 10 i $0 $0 ' 144 1996 0: 0 414 ' 0: 0 I 0 0 414 1996 0: 0 160 ' 0 I 0 I 0 0 I 150 , TTLS: $0 i $0 $608: $0 i $0 i 10 $0 I $608 samanbe~Ic:aenassssadeaa_Iae~Apx:samsa~~n:neeJeoaesq:aatlsnaaasntl2tnJeoa proof 0.3 NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 284 MEN F: J, Llj ® \ use •IWi NH 11 ~ A ggYAllq ,7 Si VIER KIN a ~low r4 "r,yo "y-Y'-~L"' .~-..i i 1 Cf. 1004E ROAD J "Cem t~ wI p 21 ~ya b ~ \ r t OF (4. ! E21, L f ~ ®l_dl 16~ D ~ ~ \ I uBrwv. X71 IN qq 4I iTA w . nip by A R ~J 1 my m4~ n, I ~P MBA >J LAIl~J y d /wry e AMEY 11~ ~E ~QDp r1fR71 f ® r `~°QJI~~ ,r A 1MMM.'1\ 285 i 15-Apr-91 DATE CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT DETAIL *#**##**####****#***#**PECAk*CR*DRAINAGE*NEAR#ROBERTSON###*#PROJECT*f*****#Month080-007*YE 994 PROJECT TITLE; Year 1609 Thousand EST START DATE: FEE 1994 TTL EST yE CAPITAL COST: 0 Thousand JUL 1995 TTL EST lilt at YEAR OkM COST! 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE; TTL EST ANNUAL O&M, COST ; I. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THIS PROJECT WILL EXPAND CAPACITY FOR PECAN CREEK PEC-4 FROM BELL AVE. EAST TOWARD BRADSHAW. 1[. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: AND THE EXIST ING CROSSINGS IMPROVEMENT DIVERSIONENORTH ALONGEBELLND OTHER R ROAD ROAD Post-Completion III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): JUL 1995 - Eat Capital Eat let Yr Est Annual Project O M Oper/Maint Oiler/Maint CAPITAL Expenditure % of COST Curr f Intl f Curr f Intl S I~ COST Curr f Intl $ Total f0 f- fo 7% Personal Serv: $0 l Services: f35 fib Supplies: 0 0 0 Land/ROW: 10 11 2X ' Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 440 546 88% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% ; Services: 0 0 0 Oth 1: entt 15 16 3% 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 0th 1 2:: ENU XXXXXXX 0 0 0% { Oth 2: XXXXXXX 0 ~ -so so TOTAL (Thous). f500 f607 100% i TOTAL (Thous):_ ;0 to -e-ame-ez aanas=~n , aae:~s_ i proof 0 G= IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): r- YR TTLc 1Bx I'd YR 1. 1994 YR TOTAL: $108 % 0 R T 5 ;MAR: 60 OCT: IFEB. 0 :NOV: 0 !DEC., 0 (JAN: APR: 6 !MAY: 10 ;JUN: 23 ',JUL: 0 ;AUG. 0 ,SEP. ' 62x ' YR TOTAL: S09 % YR TTLt YR 2 18 ~ 60 MY: 60 1DEC: 60 ;JAN: 60 1FEBt 60 1MA 5p OCT: 50 1JUNI 50 1JUL1 19 1AUG: APR: 50 ,MAY: : o 1 0% 0 i- YR ~TGTAL~ 0 1FEBt TTL: 0 iMARI YR 3. 1996 0 !JAN: 0 OCT: 0 NOVs 0 ;DEC: ;SEP; APRs 0 MAY: 0 !JUN: 0 OUL: 0 11AUG: 0 1SE proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): AUth Unauth ~gpURCE: XXXXXXXXI YEAR 1 Sold ;Unsold Unsold 1 Certificate ; Operating 1 kid In ( TOTAL YR 00 Bond 100 Bond G0 Bond ;of Obligation; Revenue ; Const Grant ; i~ f0 ` 0 9 t0 'i4 f108 i 1 1994 s 0 1995 ( 0 4990 ! 0( 0 0 0 1998 0 i f0 !r f0 i f0 10 i f607 TfLSt $0 ; $0 f607 , aaem a«a'samtls a===PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, CROW_ aOR~CONSTRUCT10Nxasaaee proof -0.1 j NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF 286 z~ ~ w gwjlx k--~ =1 L A® ISM NI w*w PA, v it ~LL ' J ~a C7~ wlrhEA5 ~D I fi +'4 L, L7L11 ~I a J1~rL---~ Roe wM~ ! 1~ 1 WL LPL,-~ M. NKKORY :~C LC®L1~Lr 1 4 R IJ LJL_ JL I / ;9 eowr wM tt~ ~I t Ent LJ i I lLEC1K ri51A ~ AS OR. ~ HILL WN06 ~®q ~ ~ ~ W 30 r L P 14 04"y ''x' p k I~ VI I I 287 b ~1~~~ 1 1 ! IMDI i f. . i. 288 i 1 I441;., i 1 I I 1 I 1 i I I PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1993-94 I I i 289 e.x#4 CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 15-Apr-91. DATE PROJECT DETAIL ***#***#****###***##*#*PECAN *Cft#KERLEY*TU*WOODROW*PHASE *1*#****PROJECT #f*#****0840-08*YE1995 PROJECT TITLE: TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $1,395 Thousand Month Year EST START DATE: FEB 1995 TTL EST tat YEAR O&M COST: 3 Thousand TTL EST ANNUAL 06M COST: 3 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: SEPT 1996 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PECAN CREEK BETWEEN UTILIZING APPROPRIKATEERLEYCHANNELSTRDESIGNEET BE IMPROVED III PROJECTED PROJECT BEVEFITS/PURPOSE: THE EXISTING CHANNEL HAS WHICH RESTRICTS CAPACITY F PROBLEMS INCLUDING ALL ROAD CROSSINGS AND IS NOT ' 111. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion eti 106 Est Capital , Est 1st Yr Est Annual Project % of ~ 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint CAPITAL Expenditure COST Curr E Intl f Total COST Curr $ Infl $ Ourr $ Infl $ i - ~ Personal S Land/ROW: 10 erv: $0 $0 f0 EO Services-, $ $50 1 % ; Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Land/ROW: 10 11 Construction: 990 11307 92% Maintenance: 2 2 2 2 ~ l 1 Oth 1: ENO 25 27 0 2% 0% Services: I l e 0 ' 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 1: EN I 0 0 0% ; 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 q 0th 2: XXXXXXX , ~ ' f3 TOTAL (Thous): 51,075 !1,395 100% ; TOTAL (Thous): $3 E3 43 1 proof 0 - j ~ IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): - YR TOTAL: $71 % YR TTL: 5% YR 1: 1996 0 ;DEC: 0 IJANt 0 iFEB: 10 :MAR: 10 OCR: 0 !NOV: APR: 16 :MAY: 12 :JUN: 12 !JUL., 12 :AUGS 0 :SEP: 0 °I- YR 2: 1996 YR TOTAL. $11324 % YR TTLt OCT: 100 :NOV; 109 :DEC: 90 ;JAN: 90 :FEBs 90 :MAR: 1290 1 0 APR: 120 :MAY: 120 :JUN: 120 !JUL: 120 iAUO: 164 !SEP• OX ~ YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TL' YR 3 1$ JUL: 0 iMAR: 0 OCT: 0 :NOVS 0 Oct 0 iJAN: 0 iFEBt 0 :t 0 NAR APR: 0 :MAY: 0 JUN: 0 0 1AUG : proof V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): ;SOURCE: XXXXXXXX: :Ruth b Unauth 6: Sold :Unsold Unsold : Certificate Operating I Aid in ; TYEAR OTAL YR 00 Bond :00 Bond GO Bond lot Obligation : Revenue ; Const Grant ' EO $71 : $0 $0 $0 $0 : $71 1996 f4 I , 0 1996 0: 0 1,324 : U( 0 0 I 0 0 p 0 1'324 1997 0 : 0 0 : - $ ; : TTL$: $0 : $0 $1,396 i f0 0 $0 $0 51,395 I ttamaamea(ssaasaszasseeacaj=z~o:enssassaeam(enaneaessssal-_ zaaanaaaa_as:z proof 0.4 NOTEt ATTACH SITES MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. i 290 I f a ' JJ D~~o ~e1 , T ` r-I A ..i I I~ • 1~ J ~ ~ ~ru Ir r 1 04. ~ hl4°tYE WSYh ==;i ~ i i 06, ~ r r [ i wow AdW w 2 ~ r ti ~OIM°WEb1Y ~ f ` i ~ h i Ylv 1 [[qtj ,f CITY Of DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 15-Apr-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL *****t****tt*t******t*ttt****#tttt**tt*********#***#t*******'~##ttt***t***t*OAGN-NO*YEAR+ , PROJECT TITLE: COOPER CREEK CHANNEL PHASE III PROJECT M: 09110-h Year TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $643 Thousand TTL EST 1st YEAR O&M COST: 2 Thousand EST START DATE: FEB 1996 JUL 1996 ' TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: 2 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: **#*#t#**#*#t*#*#*#tt****#*t*#**s**y#*#t***#*#*~*#tastt*#*#**##**###*##*#**~*t*t#######ta# ' 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: IMPROVEMENTS THAT PROVIDE CAPACITY A IMPLAN FOR PROVEMENTSO THAT CREEK ARE NEAND CESSITATED CONSTRUCT DY CHANNEL RECENT DEVELOPMENT 11, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: REDUCE FLOODING IN ISOLATED AREAS AND CORRECT OVERTOPPING OF CULVERTS FROM PHASE II TO THE END OF PHASE III III, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital _ JUL 1996 Project I Eat let Yr Eat Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of ; 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Malnt COST Curr $ Intl $ Total COST Curr $ Intl $ Curr $ Intl $ Services: $35 $35 7% Personal 9erv: SO Eb $0 $0 Land/ROW: 10 11 2% Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 440 581 88% ! Maintenance: 2 2 2 2 Equipment: 0 0 0% Services 0 0 0 0 0th It ENO 15 16 3% 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 Oth 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% 1 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 f' ' - TOTAL (Thous): $500 $643 100% ; TOTAL (Thous): $2 $2 $2 $2 i dssaa_~ssonaca_.. _ =cAaaa-_ proof 0 IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): i YR 1: 1995 YR TOTAL: $46 % YR TTL: 7% OCT: 0 INOV: 0 !DEC: 0 :JAN: 0 1FEB: 0 !MAR: 5' APR: 5 !MAY: 5 !JUN: 10 1JUL: 10 1AUO: 10 !SEP: 0 YR 2: 1996 YR TOTAL: $420 % YR TTL: 65% i OCT: 0 !NOV: 30 1DEC: 63 IJANt 53 1FEB: 56 :MAR: 56 APR: 63 ;MAY: 53 'JUN: 67 :JUL: 0 1AUG: 0 lam 0 ! YR 3. 1997 YR TOTAL: $178 % YR TTL: 28% OCT: 60 INOV: 60 IDEC: 58 ;JAN: 0 ,FEB: 0 !MAR: 0 0 !SEP: 0 APR: 0 'MAY: 0 !JUN: 0 iJUL: 0 1AUO: i , - proof 0 V, FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): 190URCE: XXXXX%XX1 'Auth & Unauth sold !Unsold Unsold I Certificate ' Operating I Aid in ! YEAR YR GO Bond !GO Bond 00 Bond ;of W igation! Revenue 1 Const Grant 1 TOTAL 1995 $0 ! $0 i46 ! $0 1 $O iy $0 $0 I~ $45 0 420 1996 0 I 0 420 1 0 O I p 0 178 1997 0 I 0 178 0 1 I ! , $0 ' _ ..$0 $ $843 TTLS: $0 ! $0 $643 I $0 ! seyesssalass_as_aasnsessslssnsss:a_anealssnasx:ssezslssassnasrrssadxan proof 0.2 NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION, 292 - r ' ~ LtQ 22r ~ I J 1 ~u ~A `1 fee am nn I/ ( 1 ®~Na rwArr BMW j~~l Km n w L__POw SiLVFP OAIE ROAO . .aoM nw+roo w f ~ 7.1 L {-?ham I I ~ ~ soo~ 1 . I I V3016u1 Q ~ ~ ` MT IL ti ®l. J~ ffTATToo AR i ~ a d! ~ dd 4 ~ P Q PllSl T a~ YY/1A11 293 1 I ~ rn I ~i ® ° G Si1t:v..• . rav 5 Il~6 1 I , r j i i I i L_. ,t ( ~~S S i i., S 294 1 I l r OTHER PROJECTS SUBMITTED j ..f i i I 295 i u ` CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 15-Apr-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT TITLE: PECAN CREEK ALONG UNIVERSITY DRIVE PROJECT s: 0810-09 1995 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $322 Thousand Month Year TTL EST 1st YEAR 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: FEB 1995 TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: JUN 1996 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: OUR INTENT IS TO PROVIDE CONCRETE LINING FOR THE BOTTUM AND MUCH OF THE SIDES OF THE CHANNEL FROM US 360 TO 300 FEET NEST OF GEORGETOWN STREET ii. ?ROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: THE EXISTING CHANNEL HAS CAPACITY LIMITATIONS AND NEGATIVE ASTHETIC IMPACT MAINTENANCE I8 VERY COSTLY AND DIFFICULT TO PROVIDE 111. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital JUN 1996 _ Project ; Eat 1st Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of ; 0 & M OperiMaint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Intl $ Total ; COST Curr S Intl $ Curr t IAfl $ Services: $20 $20 8% ; Personal Serv: $0 $0 $0 , $0 Land/ROW: 0 0 0% ; Suppiles: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 225 297 90% ; Maintnance: 0 0 0 0 Equiptlrnt: 0 0 0% ; Services: 0 0 0 0 0th 1: ENG 5 5 2% ; 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 O% ; 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous): $260 $322 100% ; TOTAL (Thane): $0 SO SO ;0 _~=--ace.eeeaa-, i _-e_e=xW -_.aae- za_-e-o-~z_oz proof 0 i' IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR 1: 1995 YR TOTAL: $165 % YR TTL: 51% OCT: 0 !NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 ;FEB: 5 ;MAR: 7 APR: 8 ,MAY: 10 ;JUN: 0 ;JUL: 45 ;AUG 45 ;SEP. 45 YR 2: 1996 YR TOTAL: $157 % YR TTL: 49% OCT: 45 !NOV: 45 ;DEC: 67 ;JAN: 0 ;FEB: 0 ;MAR# 0 i" APR: 0 (MAY: 0 {JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 ;AUO: 0 ;SEP: 0 _ , , YR 3: 1997 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% OCT: 0 !NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 ;FEB; 0 ;MAR: 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 ;SEP: 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Proof 0 Auth & Unauth &; i (SOURCE: XXXXXXXX Sold ;Unsold Unsold Certificate ; Operating ; Aid in YEAR YR GO Bond 100 Bond GO Bond ;of Obligation; Revenue ; Const Grant TOTAL 1996 s0 ' $0 $165 ! s0 $0 $0 s0 !r $166 1996 0 0 167 ; 0 0; 0 0 157 1997 0; 0 0; 0 0; 0 0; 0 TTLS: $0 $0 $322 ; $0 $0 ; $0 s0 ; $322 ~naa~e~e~aeaerxmneaoeaeee~a~scavaarsa=s ss=aesm_aasaaisannanamassasenra proof -0.4 NOTF;: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, ON CONSTRUCTION. 296 t V;YJ;v;r I M CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 15-Apr-91 DATE 1 PROJECT DETAIL **##*t#*t*t**ttt*##**#####t**##*##*##*#**##*##*#**#tt**t*#t*t**t*tttt***#*##**ORGN-NO*YEAR* PROJECT TITLE: Sequoia Park Drainage PROJECT M: 0810-12 1995 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $1,041 Thousand Month Year TTL EST 1st YEAR O&M COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: AUG 1995 TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: JAN 1996 I. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install storm sewer system in Sequoia Park subdivision. System will include a combination of underground pipe and concrete channel. II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: Solve severe street flooding problem in the Sequoia Park subdivision. There are no known accounts of water in homes. 111. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital JAN 1996 Project Est lot Yr Est Annual 1{ CAPITAL Expenditure % of 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Intl $ Total ; COST Curr $ Intl $ Curr $ Intl $ 4 I Services: $80 $93 10% ; Personal Serv: $0 $0 $0 $0 Land/ROW: 10 11 1% ; Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 710 937 89% ; Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 t Equipment: 0 0 O% ; Services: 0 0 0 0 X14 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 a 0th 2 XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 z TOTAL (Thous): - $800 $1,041 100% TOTAL (Thous): $0 $0 $0 s0 --a-----C------3 ) C..--WS--~--.-.COCA aCC~C~9aC9C3..- proof 0 ) r FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): ~ r YR 1: 1995 YR TOTAL: $396 % YR TTL: 38% OCT: 10 :NOV: 10 IDEC: 10 :JAN: 10 !FEB: 10 IMAR1 10 APR: 9 !MAY: 6 :JUN: 80 IJUL: 80 :AUG: 81 !SEP: 81 YR 2: 1996 I YR (TOTAL: $645 % YR TTL: 62% OCT: 80 INOV" 81 ;DEC: 81 !JAN: 81 :FEB: 81 !MAR: 81 APR: 80 IMAY: 80 ;JUN: 0 !JUL: 0 !AUG: 0 ISEP: 0 YR 3: 1997 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% OCT: 0 :NOV: 0 1DEC: 0 :JAN: 0 :FEB: 0 )MAR: 0 APR: 0 :MAY: 0 )JUN: 0 :JUL: 0 :AUO: 0 ISEP: 0 proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand); IAuth & Unauth ! !SOURCE: XXXXXXXXI Sold :Unsold Unsold I Certificate : Operating I Aid in 1 YEAR YR GO Bond 100 Bond 00 Bond :of Obligation : Revenue : Const Grant ! TOTAL 1996 $0 ; $0 $396 ; $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $396 1996 0: 0 645 1 0 1 0 I 0 0: 646 1997 0: U O: 0! 0! 0 0 0 1 TTL$: $0 1 $0 $10041 1 ~ $0 1 $0 1 $0 $0 1 $1,041 mass'.!A".IAlmaaaaeeaasaasa.sa:nA_xaaeaa _:sacs)aneaaamxaaaalasa~aeasaaa~aa~ms,a proof 0.2 NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 297 T -rte _ _t T S t t i 1 { CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 15-Apr-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL ~ ###**#**##*#**#*######*######*#*#*#####*###*####*######*#####~*#*###0810-12*YEA995 PROJECT TITLE: Thunderbird Drainage PROJECT Month Year TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $84 Thousand M Monon 1995 TTL EST lot YEAR 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: AUG TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST; 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: JAN 1996 ##########*##########**#################*####################*#*######'k################### i. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install storm drain system under Thunderbird St. New system will tie into existing Westgate Heights system. II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: Solve local flooding problem. Water is known to enter at least one home. III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Dearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital JAN 1996 Project ; Est lot Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr S In£l $ Total ; COST Curr $ Intl $ Curr $ Intl $ , Services: $7 $8 11% Personal Serv: E0 SO $0 $0 Land/ROW: 1 1 2% ; Supplies: 0 0 0 Construction: 57 75 88% Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 0% Services: 0 0 00 00 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 O% 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous): $65 $84 100% ; TOTAL (Thous):. $0 $0 ---$0- $0 proof 0 IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR 1: 1996 YR TOTAL: $84 OCT: 2 :NOV: 2 ;DEC: 2 ;JAN: 2 :FEB: 0 !MAR: 0 0 !AUG: 0 1SEP: APR: 25 ;MAY: 26 ;JUN: 25 1JUL: X YR TTL: 0% YR 2: 1996 YR TOTAL: $0 0 OCT: 0 !NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 FEB: 0 MAX: 0 APR: 0 MAY 0 !JUN: 0 !JUL; 0 !AUG: 0 ,SEP. YR 3: 1997 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% °OCT: 0 NOV, 0 !DEC: 0 !JAN: 0 !FEB; 0 :MAR: 0 0 APR: 0 IMAY: 0 PUN; 0 1JUL: 0 1AUG: ! proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousands !Auth & Unauth C! :SOURCE: XXXXXXXX! ! Sold !Unsold Unsold ! Certificate ! Operating ! Aid in ! YEAR YR GO Bond !GO Bond GO Bond !of Obligation! Revenue ! Const Grant ! TOTAL , _ _ i !~-_$0 ! ! $8 1996 $0 1 $0 $84 1 ! $0 0 0 $0 00 0 1996 ! 0 ! 0 1997 0! 0 0! 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $84 TTLS: $0 $O $84 , $0 , n=asaeszlanaaee_scnseoxs=l=emmamcaae--sloe.aa_amaemxle:_msnyasnaAr+i_aa proof -0.44 NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 298 j V ,ICITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 16-Apr-91 DATE i PROJECT DETAIL ####****#****##**##*#**#####*##****######*ss*#************#****************ORGN-NO*YEAR* a PROJECT TITLE: Daniels/FtWorth Dr. Drainage PROJECT M: 0610-14 1995 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $330 Thousand TTL EST Ist YEAR 08M COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: AUGth Year 1995 TTL EST ANNUAL O&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: JAN 1 998 ' ####t**#*#*########*#*#*###DATE 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install concrete bottom channel with grass side slopes between Ftworth Dr. and Acme Brick, Includes dual 8x4 box culverts at Daniels St. If. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: Solve local flooding problem. III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Est Capital Post-Completion ' Project JAN 1996 CAPITAL Expenditure X of Est 1st Yr Eat Annual COST Curr $ Infl S Total , 0 & M Opent Oper/Maint COST Curr $ $ Infl E Curr $ Infl $ Services: $26 $29 10% ! Peraonal Serv; $0 EO { Land/ROW; 10 11 g% 0 0 SO Construction: 220 290 86% Maintena: 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 ~ Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 ~ • 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% Services: 0 0 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX p 0% 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous): $255 E330 100% ; TOTAL (Thous): EO - s's=^==-=---assn ' -=^--s--s-s--$0 - $0 E0 i proof- 0 + IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR TOTAL: ;330 OCTl• 1996 iNOV: 6 'DECD , % YR TTL: 100% APR: 46 l : 49 ! 6 JAN: 6 !FEB: 6 MAR: 5 ,JUN. 49 ,JUL: 50 :AUG: 50 !SEP: 49 YR 2; F996 ~ ' 1 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: OCT., :NOV. APR: 0 :MAY: 0 IDEC; 0 !JAN: 0 !FEB: 0%l MAR: 'JUL; 0 ~ 0 JUN: 0 , 0 ;AUG: 0 ;9EP: 0 YRR 3: 1997 YR TOTAL. $o OCT: p , $0 X YR TTL: 0% APR: 0 :MAY: 0 !DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 ~FEB: 0 MAR: 0 0 0 !JUN: 0 JUL; 0 'AUG: 0 :SEP: 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): proof 0 :Ruth A Unauth !SOURCE: XXXXXXXX! Sold !Unsold Unsold ! Certificate ! Operating ! Aid In YR GO Bond !GO Bond GO Bond !of Obligation! Revenue ! YEAR f ~ , ! Conat Grant ! TOTAL 1996 ' 1996 EO ! p 3300 E ! $0 : $0 $0 ! E330 i 1997 0I 0 0! 0! 0: 0 0! 0 ! ! 0! 0 i 0 0! 0 TTLS: EO ! $0 $330 : $0 aeaxasa3lsasamaaaasaeasss(aa,assaessasalaxsaaasassslsamas;asnaaaaaaac $330 NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAN;. ROW OR proof -0.2 299 ' CONSTRUCTION, : j i y ald r%*fi t l l E ~ r I I I i `y E° I; i i 300 ;E S 1991-96 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN rs-r~~-sr LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (ALL YEARS)... _ - GRASS OPER d TOTAL. NET ReQ007NrA PF?O)WF PROJECT CAP(TAL MArNr GRASS C4P7AL DEPT NUNN R NAME aasT COST _ COLST OAST l PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1991-92: AIRPORT 0019-0i LAND ACQ RUNWAY EXTENSION 126,000 0 12,000 12,000 AIRPORT 0019-02 1 THOUS FT RUNWAY EXT 1,250,000 1,000 126,000 125,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1995-96: AIRPORT _ 0019-04 OVERLAY RUNWAY 17135 1,175,000 1,000 116,000 117,V00 t { AIRPORT 0019-05 SEAL COAT TMAPRONIPAINT T 261,000 1,000 27,000 26,000 OTHER PROJECTS SUBMITTED: , r o AIRPORT .:0019.08 CONSTRUCT N HOLDING APRON 110,000 1,000 12,000 11006' 1,458,000 0 141,000 ib1,000 ti AIRPORT 0019-07 LAND ! 70 FOR 1500 I AIRPORT 0010-06 CONSTRUCT N RUNWAY 1500 2,335,000 0 233000 283,004 AIRPORT 0019-09 EXEC JET PARKING APRON 300,000 0 30,CA0 30,000 ` . AIRPORT 0019-10 COMMERCIAL SERV APRON 243,000 0 24,080 24,400 AIRPORT 0019-11 NEW FUEL STORAGE FACILITY 11050,000 5,000 110,000 105,000 i; I } 1 r 1 f 4 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1991-92 1 { 1 1 303 02-Apr-91 DATE " CITY )F DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN w PROJECT DETAIL ####################*##LAND#AQUISITION#RUNWAY#£XTENSION####~PROJECT#i*#####0019-04#YE sac Month PROJECT TITLE: $126-Thousand OCT 1991 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: JAN 19'92 TTL EST 1st, YEAR O&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: TTL EST ANNUAL 06M COSTS 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION. LAND ACQUISITION NORTH AND SOUTH END FOR RUNWAY EXTENSION. 11. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND PEOPLE/ IMPROVE THE AIRPORT Post-Completion _ IiI. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand). JAN 1992 E 1 t Yr Est Annual Est Capital , Opor/Maint Project penditu ; 0 & M Oper/Maittt CAPITAL Expenditure X of COST Corr $ Intl $ Corr $ Intl $ ~ COST Corr $ Intl $ Total Q $ Q OX { Personal Serv: $0 $ 0 0 Services 3uppliest ° 0 p Land/ROW: 126 1260 100% { Maintenances 00 00 0 0 Constructions 0 0% $ Services: 0 0 0 r" 0 0 1 Equipments 0 0 O% $ Oth,l: XXXXXXX ° n o 0th 1: XXXXXXX G ° 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% $ 0th 21 XXXXXXX , 0 $0 SO as ca_seseoeaaG~- L. 126 100% $ 'T'OTAL (Thous) t 50 5 TOTAL (Thous): $126 $ , aamna=xeeaxec- ,.-~soaeaeeaascsa , proof 0 1Y. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): 100% YR TOTAL. $126 % YR TTL: 0 IhSARt ° YR 1: 1991 0 IDECt 0 IJANt 63 IFEB: OCT; O INOV: 0 ISgp' Q 3 0 {JUN: 0 IJUL: 63 IAUG: APR: 0 1MAY: I $ ----~I yR TOTAL! s %yYR TTL: O Ij 0 YR 21 1992 0 IDEC: 0 IJANt IFEB: 0 'SEP: 0 OCTt 0 INOV: p IJUN: 0 IJUL1 IAUGt APR: 0 ,MAYS I~~$ 3 YR TOTALt SO % YR TTL: 0% 0 ; YR 3t 1893 , 0 ;JAN: 0 IFEB: 0 ,MARS 0 OCT: 0 INOVt 0 ,DECt 0 , ,JUL Q I I AUG: 0 11SEP: 0 IMAYS 0 IJUNt . I___ APR: _ ~I I _ i_ proof ° V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): IAuth d Unauth ISOURCE: FAA YEAR Const Grant TOTAL Sold IUnsold U Unsol nsold I Certificate $ ORevenueE I I Aid I YR GO Bond t00 Bond GO Bond lot Obligation) _ -I--- -$i26 I $0 i~ 0 $114 1 0 Q~ 199rro $0 0 I 0 I ° 1992 0 1 U O 0 I 1 0 I' 0 , 1893 Q I ° I I $ ____._I S126 TTLS: SO $ SO SO , a6aaxa proof aaaaxxaalxax"MA =p°Cp PROJECT #INCLUDES xLANDsxROW, aORaCONSTRUCTION. NOTE: AT9",lC% SITE 304 s i4te~rt,S Mal , I f~ . -Mal ,tl pNlfY. MV 1 1 ! 1 V , X305 ~ 09-Apr-91 DATE ,,ITY' OF DENTON CAPITAL I4pRovEMENT PLAN PROJECT DETAIL **************#****#***********************#*****#***t********************0019-NO*YE199 SO PROJECT p: 0019-02 1992 Year ONE THOUSAND FOOT RUNWAY EXTENSION Month 1992 PROJECT TITLE: $1,350 Thousand EST START DATE: JAN TTL EST CAPITAL COST: I Thousand COMPL DATE: DEC 1992 TTL EST 1st YEAR 0&M COST: EST p Thousand TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: I, BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: REPLACE DAINAGE UNDER RUNWAY ONE THOUSAND FOOT RUNWAY EXTENSION SOUTH, EXTENSION M I.R L, LIGHTING SYSTEM AND TAXIWAY, BUILD HOLDING APRON % 11, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: F- THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND PEOPLF/IMPROVE THE AIRPORT Post-Completion • III. PROJECT BUDGET (Doll DEC letars to Nearest Thousand): --at`_ Est Annual 1992 Est Capital E 1st Yr Annuat Project 0 & N Oper/Maint pt p l $ Curr $ Infl Expenditure % of COST Curr $ Int CAPITAL S- Cttrr S infl $ Total - - SO 30 COST _ Personal Serv; - 0 _ w50 0 0 p _ - - 0% Services; $0 $0 0 0 0% supplies. 0 0 0 0 Land/ROW: ' , Constructi 1 p 0 r" on: 1,250 1,3500 0 100% Services: 1 0 Equipment; Maintenance: 0% , 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 p 0 OX 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX - _ Thoua). " S$1 $l O SU _ l.. TOTAL (Thous); S1,250 $1,350- 100% i TOTAL proof IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest % p ;MART 0 1992 y---+-Y TOTAL: $1,350 YR DEC: 0 ,JAN: 679 ,FEB: 0 , OCT: 0 ;NOV: 0 i 671 ;AUG; SEP 0 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 , JUL: APR: I -I % YR TTL: 0 ,FEB: 1993 - YR TOT--.AL! $0 JAN• 0 IMAR: 0 YR 0 - 0 OCT: 0 ;NOV: 0 DEC: 0 'A= 0 'SEP: 0 ,JUN: 0 , ,JUN: i _ APR: 0 !MAY: Ox % YR TTL: TOTAL. $0 , FEB: b ;MAR: 0 YR 3: 1994 0 ;DEC: 0 JAN: I EP. 0 OCT: 0 ;NOV: 0 iJUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 ,S 0 ',MAY: 0 ;JUN: - - proof 0 APR' V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): !SOURCE: FAA ; YEAR Auth & Unauth &'I Certificate ; Operating ; Aid In ' TOTAL YR GO Sold Bond I GO Unsold , , Revenue ; Const Grant , GO Bond ' (,0 Bond ,of Obligation gp0 $1,225 ,350 - l99 $2 ; $0 p $0 51205 0 0 0 p ! _ 1993 0 0 0 0 , ~ - 1994 0 0 0 i _ _i i- - $0 51,2 i 51,1>0 $0 ' $0 .,'_._----$125 $ l 0 roof 0 TTLS: se=====i. P NOTE: ATTACH 91TF MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES 3 b , ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. j k i tiftl'•'.l1Sy jw "MIA "a /00 j . -1 ' , f K / 307 ' ,Y~'° ~ 3 il4ita`['a ~ a fJ'.' 1 ISRR357i r I ' H ~f y ii j i` it ~ { 1 I { 1 ' i ' ~ ~i i,. , , r ' i i... ' i..: t..:. , ~ 1D8 ~i VA. t f:'at•',uiN I E 1 I . .J I I PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1995-96 w, i w~ { { i I 309 tY.:Hrr.x(; i ~ t 02-Apr-91 DATE CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 992 PROJECT DETAIL **#####*############**####*#####*#***#**####*#####*####IVE *YE 1992 FIVE OVERLAY RUNWAY SEVENTEEN/THIRTY PROJECT St 0019-Month Month Year 7' PROJECT TITLE: $1,176 Thousand AUO 1992 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: 1 Thousand BST START DATE: JUG 1992 TTL EST Ist YEAR O&H CASTS 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: TTL EST ANNUAL O&M COSTS I. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: OVERLAY RUNWAY SEVENTEEN/THIRTY FIVE AND REPAINT 11, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND PEOPLE/IMPROVE THE AIRPORT Post-Completion 111. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): JAN 1992 Est Capital Tt E st Yr Eat Annual " Project 1 1, 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint CAPITAL Expenditure X of i Infl $ Cum $ Infl 8 Infl E Total COST Curr COST Curr i ' Personal 9erv: 50 '0 S ;p $0 $0 0% Services: 0 OX 1 Supplieai 1 1 Land/ROW : ~ ' G f Construction: 10068 10178 100% Services: Maintenan0es I 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 0 0 OX 0 C 0 0 0th It XXXXXXX 0 0 ~ dth 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 OX 0th 2s XXXXXXX 0 0th 2: X%XXXXX TOTAL (Thous): $1 41 p $1,275 100% 51 088 sassaasasaaasesa TOTAL (Thous): aaaca - eatsaaaaneasasas proof O IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): ~ i I x YRR ITLI 100X 0 ,MAR: YR 1: 1992 YR TOTALS $I,176 690 'FEBt 0 INOV: 0 {DEC: 0 ;JAN; p 1SEPs APROCT! : 0 IMAY: p ;JUN: 0 IJULt 686 yAUO: I 1 _ % YR TTLt OX YR 2 lg YR !D FOTAG: $O JAN: 9 IFEBt 0 IMAR: EC. 0 1BEPt i . OCT: 0 ,NOY. 0 0 13UN; Q IJULt 0 IAU0 APR: 0 `MAY: i ~I { YR TOTAL; EO % YR TTL: 0%~ t YR 3: k994 0 ;DEC: 0 IJAN: 0 JAUG 0 I$EP ~ OCT: 0 INOVs 0 IJUN: 0 IJULI APR: 0 1MAY; ' i 0 v ' proof V, FUNDING 80URCE8 (Dollars to Nearest Thousands `SntjR0E: FAA I YEAR IAuth do UUnsol 0I Certificate I Operating 1 Aid )n I YEAR Sold SUnsoid Unsaid , GO Bond IGO Bond CO Bond !of obligation { Revenue ;Cons Grant ` TOTAI YR ' i0 51,0680 : ' 3 196_ p 1 $0 $0 0 1 o 1 01 0 0 i p 1993 5 8 1994 0 1 0 ~ ;0 $0 0.1 TTLSt $0 i ;1I7 _ i=== sass::azlzzazaanaazaaaamslanzaaszmasassn ns"aOR~a~9TRUCTION MOAN= msaa proof NOTEI ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUD 38 0 ND, ROW, Ozah'd't3 r ' r.,4 f% ♦ X11 ; ~ I "Y ~ ...w. r ~.j'I \ .._.j rrr~.. ' ~ J ~ crMtiµ ~o~ r NNI, 311 fA I'll 1 / LL 1111._,.. . MINE! i t i~ CU3'!'t, 851 CITY OF VENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 02-Apr-91 DATE - i PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT TITLES SEAL COAT TAXIWAY AND APRON, PAINT T PROJECT 0019-08 1992 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $261 Thousand Month Year TTL EST let YEAR O&M COST: 1 Thousand EST START DATE: AUG 1992 TTL EST ANNUAL O&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATEt JAN 1992 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SEAL COAT TAXIWAYS AND APRON, PAINT TAXIWAY STRIPES II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE; THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND PEOPLE/IMPROVE THE AIRPORT III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Eat Capital JAN 1992 Project ; Eat let Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of ; 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Malnt COST Curr $ Intl $ Total ; COST Curr $ Intl $ Curr # Intl $ + Servicest $0 $0 0% I Personal Serv, $0 $0 $0 $0 Land/RoWt 0 0 O% Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 237 261 100% Maintenance: 1 1 0 0 Equipments 0 0 0% Servicest 0 0 0 0 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% I Oth 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0" 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% 0th 2. XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous); _ $237 $261 100% TOTAL (Thous)t $1 $1 $0 $0 s-aaxaa-_aaaa_aa ~ -x_axx.a_-xaaxax xaxaaaaaxyaa-. ~ - proof 0 IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR 1; 1992 YR TOTALt $261 % YR TTL: 100% OCT, 0 ,NOV., 0 IDEC: 0 IJANt 128 !FEB: 0 IMARt 0 APR-. 0 'MAY: 0 IJUNt 0 IJUL, 133 !AUG: 0 ISEP: 0 YR 2: 1993 YR TOTAL; $0 % YR TTL: 0% OCT; 0 )NOV: 0 'DEC: 0 ,'JANt 0 ;FEB, 0 IMAR: 0 APRs 0 'MAYS 0 'JUN: 0 'JUL: 0 'AUGt 0 ISEP: 0 i.. YR 3; 1994 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTLt 0%~ OCT: 0 INOVt 0 'DEC: 0 IJAN: 0 IFEB: 0 'MARL 0 I APR,. 0 IMAYt 0 'JUN: 0 ,JULt 0 'AUGi 0 ISEPt 0 V, FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Proof 0 IAuth & Unauth 41 ' ,SOURCES FAA ; Sold IUnsold Unsold I Certificate I Operating ' Aid in I YEAR YR GO Bond !GO Bond 00 Bond lot Obligation; Revenue I Const Grant I TOTAL I ' 1992 $0 41 $0 $0 i $26 it $0 I $0 $236 I $261- 1993 0I 0 0I 0l 0I 0 0I 0 1994 0 I 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 TTLSt $0 ' $0 $0 i $26~j $0 $0 $236 $261 easaaexa xaxxaxee-xaaaexs aaxeexxaaceaxlxa_xmaesatxalasexxxxexasaaxxax proof 0.3 NOTES ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 312 I .11 lu 16 n~ / ^ ..avow t Cuomo + y X313 c ~x eat tu 2449 kfd1~4'A { lS.tf;K3 t j I 5 I L i r•~ e i" i 314 4 k[l'Fi<a~c?J 111 t f V j i E j 1 OTHER PROJECTS SUBMITTED E r '1s i do- G:r;::*:a d~~ t CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 02-Apr-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT TITLE: CONSTRUCT NORTH HOLDING APRON PROJECT Ott 0019-06 1993 ,r TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $110 Thousand Month Year TTL EST let YEAR O&H COST: I Thousand EST START DATE: AUG 1993 TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATES JAN 1993 i 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS CONSTRUCT NORTH HOLDING APRON II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND PEOPLE/IMPROVE TAE AIRPORT III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand)t Post-Completion Eat Capital JAN 1993 Project i Eat lot Yr Eat Annual ~ j CAPITAL Expenditure X of 1 0& M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Intl $ Total I COST Curr $ Intl $ Curr $ Intl $ $4 j , j Services: $0 $O 0% 1 Personal 9erv: $0 $0 $0 Land/ROW: 0 0 0% 1 Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Constructiont 96 110 100% 1 Maintenance: I 1 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 O% 1 Services: 0 0 0 0 l 0th l: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% i Oth It XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 E 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% 1 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 i... TOTAL (Thous): $95 $110 100% 1 TOTAL (Thous): $1 $1 $0 $0 °--mmmemaaaacam= ' =---mOaammmmeaee eOa°aame r-aea:proof 0 IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR 1t 1993 YR TOTAL: $110 % YR TTL: 100% i , OCT: 0 !NOV: 0 IDEC: 0 IJANt 66 IFEBt APR: 0 IMAYt 0 IJUN: 0 !JUL: 66 IAUGt 0 ISEP: 0 YR 2: 1994 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: O% I OCTs 0 INOVs 0 IDEC: 0 IJANt O IFEB: 0 1MAR: 0 APRs 0 MAY. 0 IJUN: 0 IJUL: 0 )AUG: 0 ISEP: 0 I ~ I I YR 3: 1996 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: O%~ 01IT: 0 !NOV: 0 IDEC: 0 IJANt 0 IFEB: 0 IMAR: 0 ,,PR: 0 1MAYt 0 IJUN: 0 IJUL: 0 !AVG: 0 ISEP: 0 proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand)t IAuth & Unauth &I i (SOURCE: FAA I Sold IUnsold Unsold 1 Certificate I Operating I Aid in i YEAR YR 00 Bond 100 Bond GO Bond lot Obligation) Revenue I Const Grant ! TOTAL 1993 $0 i $0 $0 1 $11 1 $0 1 $0 $99 1 $1100 1994 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0! 1996 0 I 0 0) 0 I 0 I 0 0 I 0 TTLSs $0 1 $0 $0 I $11 1 $0 i $0 $99 ! $110 myxmammmlmmamammmmammmamnlamamamxaq~aamlemmcasamxmmlmmmrymmammmammamm proof -0.2 NOTES ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES AND, ROW, 09 CONSTRUCTION. 316 i CI'[Y OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAY 18-Jun-93 DATE I PROJECT DETAIL f *#****#**#****#********#*****#**#**#*********#*******#a***x**************a****ORGN-NO*YEAR► 199 PROJECT TITLE: LAND ACQUISITION FOR FIFTEEN HUNDRED FT PROJECT # OMonth7 Yea f TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $1,466 Thousand AUG lea TTL EST 1st YEAR 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: JAN 199 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: LAND ACQUISITION FOR FIFTEEN HUNDRED FT EXTENSION NORTH, RE-CONSTRUCT MASCN BRANCH ROAD II, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND PEOPLE/IMPROVE THE AIRPORT Est (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-JANCompletion III. PROJECT BUDGET 93 Est Capital st Yr Est Annual Protect Est Is CAPITAL Expenditure % of ; 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Tnfl $ Total COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr $ Infl ° I Services: y $O $0 O% ; Personal Serv: $0 $0 $0 $ Land/ROW: 0 0 0% i Supplies: 0 0 0 Construction: 10400 11466 100% ; Maintenance: 0 0 0 - Equip~'ent; 0 0 0% ; Services: 0 0 0 D 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0th 0th 12: t XXXXXXX XXrXXXX 0 0 0 p% Oth 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 ~ TOTAL (Thous): 100% TOTAL (Thous): $0 $0 - $b $ , - - proof 0 IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): .1 t YR 1: 1993 YR TOTAL: $1,456 % YR TTL: 100% - ' OCT: 0 )NOV: 0 )DEC: 0 :JAN-. 727 FEB: ;0 ,MART ' APR, 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 ~JUL: 729 AUG: O :SEP: j - ' YR 2: 1994 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% i 0 'DEC: 0 {JAN: 0 )FEB: O ,'g~~ it OCT: 0 {NOV: i APR: 0 ,MAY: 0 ,JUN; 0 iJUL: 0 !All: YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 07 YT T 1995 0 IJAN: 0 !FEB: 0 ;MAR: OCT: 0 !NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;SEP; APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 :JUN: 0 )JUL: 0 !AUG: proof V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): ;Ruth & Unauth &; ' ;SOURCE: FAA YEAR Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; Certificate ; Operating ; Aid in ) YR GO Bond ;GO Bond GO Bond ;of Obligation ; Revenue Const Grant TOTA I ~ ) i $0 $1,3].5 $1r45' 1993 $0 1 $0 $0 $141 $0 0 , 0 ) 0 0 0 0~ 0~ 0) 0 0; t 1994 0) 0 0 1995 0 i , ' ~ $141 i $O ) $0 $1,316 ) $1,45 TTLS: $0 ) $0 $0 ) proof NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES ND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 31L7 y t3:.lrt?3:' CI-Cy OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 18-Jun-91 DATE ~ A PROJECT DETAIL **#*****##********#***********#*******:~********##**##s#*#.z##*#*#***#**##******OkON-NO*YEAR* PROJECT TITLE: CONSTRUCT NORTH RUNWAY FIFTEEN HUNDRED PROJECT k: 0019-48 199 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $2,336 Thousand 1 ~E Month Y a TTL EST Ist YEAR 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: AUG ' TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: JAN 199'- 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT NORTH RUNWAY FIFTEEN HUNDRED FT AND TAXIWAY, MOVE ALL I.L.S. LIGHTS FIFTEEN HUNDRED FT AND INSTALL TAXIWAY LIGHTS ' II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND PEOPLE/IMPROVE THE AIRPORT III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion _ JAN 1993 Est Capital Est 1st Yr Est Annual Project I CAPITAL Expenditure % of ; 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Infl $ Total COST Curr E Infl $ Curer $ Infl Services: 50 $0 0% : Personal Serv: $0 50 50 $ Land/ROW: 0 0 0% ; Supplies: 0 0 0 1,., . Construction: 11946 21335 100% ; Maintenance: 0 0 0 j Equipment: 0 0 0% ; Services: 0 0 0th is XX%XXXX 0 0 0% ; 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXK 0 0 0% ; Oth 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous): $1,946 $2,335 100% TOTAL (Thous):-_-_^$0----- $o- _^-$0_-' $ + proof 0 IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR 1: 1993 YR TOTAL: $2,336 % YR T'iL: 100% OCT: 0 :NOV: 0 !DEC: 0 IJAN: 1,166 !FEB: 0 1KAR: 0 lJUL: 11167 1AUO; 0 :SEP: APR: 0 IMAY: 0 !JUN: ' r~ _ ! - $0 X YR TTL: OX OTAL : , i YR 2: 1994 YR T 0 :DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 IFEB: 0 ,MAR. OCT: 0 :NOV: APR: 0 :MAY: 0 PUN: 0 PUL: 0 :AUG: 0 !SEP: ( ~ ~ _ • YR 3: 1995 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: O% 0 :MAR: 0 :JAN: 0 IFEB: OCR: 0 !NOV: 00 !JUN: 0 IJUL: 0 IAUO: 0 ISEPt IEC: APR: 0 :MAY: _ I -.proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): ;SOURCE: FAA I !Auth & Unauth &I i Sold ,Unsold Unsold : Certificate ! Operating I Aid in ! YEAR YR W Bond !GO Bond GO Bond !of Obligation Revenue Const Grant TOTA _ - 1993 $0 $0 SO $233 ! EO 1--$0 $2,102 1 $2,33 i ! + 0 ! ! 1994 0! 0 0 0 0 0 + ! 0+ 0 0! 0 + ' 1990 0 ! 0 0 ! ! ; ! -l----- 50 ,102 ! 52,33 $23 $0 ; proof -0. TTLS: EO ! $0 10 $2 NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES 18AND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. i :I _ ( i 1 CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 18-Jun-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL *##*####**####**k#**####**~*#*##**##****###*t##*##*#####**#*######*##*****#ORON-NO*YEAR* PROJECT TITLE: EXECUTIVE JET PARKING APRON PROJECT k: 0019°09 1994 t TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $300 Thousand Month Year TTL EST 1st YEAR 0&M COST: 1 Thousand EST START DATE: AUG 1994 TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: JAN 1994 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: EXECUTIVE JET PARKING APRON ONE HUNDRED FT BY ONE HUNDRED FIFTY FT II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND PEOPLE/IMPROVE THE AIRPORT 111. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital. JAN 1994 Project ! Est 1st Yr Est Annual w CAPITAL Expenditure % of ; 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maim COST Curr $ Intl $ Total ; COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr $ Intl $ Services: $0 -$0 0% Personal Serv: $0 $0 $0 $0 0 OX Supplies: 0 0 0 0 I Land/ROW: 0 I Construction: 242 300 100% Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 O% Services: I' 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 - 0 0 ( '"I TOTAL (Thous): $242- -$300- 100% ; TOTAL (Thous): ---_$1$1. __$0_ ...$0 proof 0 , IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR 1: 1994 YR TOTAL: $300 % YR TTL; 100% OCT: 0 INOV: 0 )DEC: 0 !JAN: 160 (FEB: 0 )MAR: 0 ..,i APR; 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 )JUL: 150 ;AUG: 0 (JEP: 0 YR 2; 1996 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% OCT: 0 !NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 !JAN; 0 )FEB: 0 ;MAR: 0 " APR; 0 !MAY: 0 AN, 0 (JUL: 0 :AUG: 0 (SEP: 0 % YR TTL: 0% YR 3: 1996 YR TOTAL: $0 OCT; 0 ;NOV; 0 ;DEC: 0 !JAN; 0 :FEB: 0 ;MAR: 0 } ' APR: 0 lMAY. 0 ;JUN: 0 ;JUL; 0 AUG: 0 :SEP: 0 ' proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): jAuth & Unauth &; !SOURCE: FAA j Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; Certificate ; Operating ! Aid in ; YEAR YR GO Bond 100 Bond GO Bond ;of Obligation; Revenue ) Connt Grant ; TOTAL 1994 $0 i $0 $0 1 $30 ) $0 ! $0 $270 ; $300 1995 0) 0 0! 0) 0 1 0 0) 00 1998 0! 0 0 I 0( 0) 0 0 $300 TTLS:~$0 I~ $0 $o ) $30 ! EO ! $0 $270 , proof -0.08 NOTE; ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION, 319 1 w,. CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 02-Apr-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL *#tt*#**t*##*t##*#####*##**##*****##*t**#############t*##*###*##**#######t#ORON-NO#YEARt PROJECT TITLEt COMMERCIAL SERVICE APRON PROJECT $1 0019-10 1994 ` TTL EST CAPITAL COSTt $243 Thousand Month Year TTL EST let YEAR O&M COSTS U Thousand EST START DATEt AUG 1994 TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST; 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATEt JAN 1994 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: r COMMERCIAL SERVICE APRON FOUR HUNDRED EIGHTY FT BY ONE HUNDED FIFTY FT II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/ PURPOSE: L THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND PEOPLE/IMPROVE THE AIRPORT + III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion {I Est Capital JAN 1994 Project ; Est let Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of 1 0 & M Oper/Maim Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Infl $ Total COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr $ Intl $ Servicess $0 $0 O% i Personal Servt $0 $0 $0 $0 I Land/ROW: 0 0 O% ; Supplies: 0 0 0 b 1 Construction: 196 243 100% ; Maintenances 0 0 0 Q Equiptaentt 0 0 0% ; Services: 0 0 0 0 0th It XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; Oth-1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 2s XXXXXXX 0 0 O% i 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL (Thous): $196 $243 100% i TOTAL (Thous): $ ~r -proof 0 IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR is 1994 YR TOTAL: $243 % YR TTL: 100% 0 INOV: 0 !DEC: 0 (JAN: 121 IFEBt O Imo. 0 OCT; , 0 IJUL: 122 !AUG: 0 !SEP: 0 APR: 0 IMAY: 0 ,JUN, , OC 21 1996 YR TOTAL# $0 % YR TTL: Q% 0 i. OCT: 0 INOV: 0 IDECI 0 )JAN; 0 IFEBt 0 im : APRs 0 IMAY; 0 IJUNt 0 ;JUG: 0 !AUG! 0 ISEP1 0 YR 33: 1996 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL! O% 0 (MAR: 0 , ' OCTt 0 {NOV; 0 ;DEC; 0 ,JAN: 0 ,FEB. APRs 0 )MAY: 0 ;JUNt 0 :JUL: 0 )AUG: 0 ISEP: 0" _i proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): IAuth & Unauth &I 180URCE: FAA i i YEAR Sold (Unsold Unsold I Certificate ; Operating I Aid in I TOTAL YR GO Bond IGO Bond GO Bond ',of Obligation; Revenue Const Grant 1994 $0 i $0 $0 i $24 --so !--so I~_ 1996 0 1 0 0 0' 0` 0 0. ~ 1996 O i 0 0 0 1 O i 0 0 0 j TTLS1 $0 i $D $0 , $24 I $O i $0 $219 I $243 ' maes~eaalcx~es::avezs~aalmeyaa:eas:aaala s:asaa~as:lorasansssrsoaase: proof -0.04 NOTES ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 320 R.J. 4 Vie.. . r.. 18-Jun-91 DATE CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT DETAIL ***#*#00009-i1 19 9 PROJECT 0 PROJECT TITLE: NEW FUEL STORAGE FACILITY Month You i TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $1,050 Thousand EST START DATE: AUG 199 6 Thousand JAN 199 TTL EST 1st YEAR O&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: I, I. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEW FUEL, STORAGE FACILITY - II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND PEOPLE/IMPROVE THE AIRPORT Post-Completion III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): JAN 1995 Est Annual Est Capital Eat 1st Yr oiler/Mainz ` % of Project , 0 & M Oiler/Maim CAPITAL Expenditure Total COST Corr $ Infl $ Curr $ Infl Curr $ Infl $ COST Personal Serv: $0 $O $0 $ services: $0 $Q O% i Supplies: 0 0 0 0 : 5 6 j i Land/ROW: 360 26% Maintenance i 0 0 O ( Construction; 7250 00 700 74% i Services; 0 0 Equipment; 0 0 0% i 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 oth 1: XXXXXXX 0% ; 0th 2: XXXXXXX~ 0 _ i i . 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 $6 $ $ 100% ; TOTAL (Thous): 6 r~ TOTAL (Thous) 5950--$1-'050 - proof - 0 i 1 r~ IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): % YR TTL: 100% °W' YR TO~---TALC -$1,060 YR 1: 1996 DEC: 0 !JAN, 525 IFEB: 0 MAR: OCT: I I,NOV: 0 ' Q IJUL: 525 ;AUG: 0 ,SEP: - 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 1 a APR: X YR TTL: OX MAR: 0 MAR YR 22: 19 0 ;DECAL. ;0 JAN; 0 '~FEBt 0 1 OCT: 0 !NOV* 0 1JUN: 0 1JUL: 0 ,AUG, 1 0 IMAY: APR: YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0 ,NOV; , 0 1MAA: ~ YR 3: 199'! 0 iDEC: 0 !JAN- 0 ,FEB: 0 I5EP: J OCT: 0 ,UL: 0 ;AUG: 0 'IMAY: 0 IJUNi 1 J , i 0 APR: `proof 1 - , 1SOURCE: FAA V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Auth d UUnsol &1 YEAR Certificate 1 Operating 'I Aid in Sold ;Unsold Unsold , Revenue 1 Const Grant TOTA. YR GO Bond IGO Bond GO Bond :of Obligation - 1 1 - ;--__y0 1-- $9460 $105 , 1995 $0 i $0 $0 i 0 1 0 0 0' I 1996 , , 1997 0 1 0 0 0 TTLS: $0 $0 5945 $1,051 1_ - $ $Q S roof _$0 $0 P i _,_-ae~eso:~=a_~ex'IS '~nr.:::ac='ies===-e=ac„e==_--- NOTE: ATTACH 3ITE MAP IF PROJECT INCL:Pr321AND, ftOW, Oft C4N5TRUCTION. is i i r iw I~ ~w ~l 1 r P ' i ~a 3._ i 322 i y , Z f f 1991-96 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 14-Jun-V LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED ALL YEARS j GPM OPW & MTAL Aft? AEQW8rW PRaAECT P"ix-or CAPITAL AMWr Q CAWrAL Dipr work" NAME ow COST 00.47 ' COST PROJECTS SUBMITTED: LIBRARY 0070-01 DENT014 PUBUO LIBRARY BRANCH 1,542,000 305,000 1,847,000 1,512,000 LIBRARY 0070-02 ON-LINE CATELOG. PHASE 2 311,000 0 311,000 311,000 LIBRARY 0070-03 PLAN 2 LIBRARY BRANCH 3,784,000 321,000 41105,040 3,784;000 i I I IF- -1 Y p..~ra aar i Y IwOk ~ i j I~a _.1 OTHER ~.I PROJECTS SUBMITTED E 325 I t fit[ck.3=f 1. evil 13-Mar-9i DATE CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN I w- PROJECT DETAIL. PROJECT 01 0070-01 1995 rtrrt*rtrtrtrtrt'a•'~"rtw•rt•'~wrt«rtra+~w*rt«w*rtLICrtLIBRARY rtBRANCH *rtrt*rtrtrt*rt*r***rtrt**rtwrrrrtOMonth OrtYEAYear PUP N , DE 5 PROJECT TITLE1 NTO 1,542 Thousand E57 START DATE' JAN 199 TTL EST CAPITAL COST' 305 Thousand SEP 1996 TTL EST 1st YEAR 0&M COS'ft 305 Thousand EST COMPL DATES TTL EFT ANNUAL OLM COST' rtrtrtrrtrtrtrtrtrtr,rtrtrtrtrt'~krtw*krtCRIPTIONtrtrr+'rr+trtrt**rrtrrrtrt**rt~*LANE rtANDrtL1LLIAN*MILLER rtrt*srrrtrt*rtrtrtrt ST DENTON AT TEASLEY I. BRIEF PROJECT DES BRANCti AN ESA ED IN SIZE A 15,000 SQUARE FEET, ) LWARY PARKWAY v IL, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSES TO PROVIDE ADDITION LIBRARY SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS IN A HEAVILY POPULATED REGION OUTSIDE OF THE CENTRAL AREA. Post-Completion l - - S£P 1996 - III III, PROTECT BUDGET (Dolars to Nearest Thousand)' -~s-1st Yr Est Annual Est Capital I Oper/Maint protect 1 Oper/Matnt y, of 0 & M Infl # Curr # Lnfl 4 Empenditure { COST Curr # CAPITAL # , COST Curr Infl # Total X219 " 1 -$16q-- -f2i9 flB9 - #135_ _r-l0'% 1 Personal 5ervt 2 2 2 2 ' Services' 3125 0% 1 Suppliest 2 1 2 0 0 Maintenances ! 1 1 Land/ROWt 975 19297 9i% 1 1 1 sal Constructiont 713 124 8% k Services' 63 al 63 )i 100 Equipments 0 p% 1 0th 121 1 0 0 0 4 4th tt XXXXX%X 0 0th 2' XXXXX%X _ _ _ #305 { flth 2t XXX%XXX -y - - 1 i25b $30S #256 100% 1 TOTAL (Thous)f xay= a=°=II= #L 542 1 z== <a== ~aI TOTAL (Thou5)1 #1,200 _-mcnca proof 0 lV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand)' 129/-""----__--- k` Y,"YR TTL' IMAFtt 4 - ------------YR-"TOTALs$1,542 0 135 IFEB' 1,407 YR-11 - 0 IDECt 0 {JANs 0 IAUGS 4 I$ET's 1995 OCTs 0 INOVS 0 IJUNI 0 IJULI _ 1------------ APRs 0 IMAYs -1--~---------- - yRr }OTALt f0 IFEBS 0 IMARt YRr2sy 1996 - 0 IJANt 0 0 ISEPt 0 ` 0 INOV1 0 IDECI 0 IJULS 0 IAUGs _.._I-------------- GC7s 0 1JUNS I_ 0IMAYS APRs J- I %,Yp TTL' 0 MAR: 0 YR TOTAL' #0 0 IFEB' YR-3s- 1997 0 IDECS 0 IJAN: 0 kSEPI 0 0 INOVS 0 IJULI 0 IAUGs IMAYs 0 IJUNI _ ) OCTAPRs tl t I - proof 0 _~-V.-FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Tho'sand)S ISOURCEI XXXXXXXXII YEAR 1Auth & Unauth &1 I Aid in TOTAL rating IUnsold Unsold I Certificate 1 Opevenue of Obltgatloni Revenue I Cons Grant i Sold ' - I _ _ ---1_ _Q__---" $0 1 #600 YR AO Band IGO Bond GO Band Il "__I I #0 1 #0 l 0 I 942 1995 fo-1-°#b00- "#0 1 Q l 0 1 U 0 1 0 1996 0 1 0 7 S2 I 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 { -"---------------0 1997 -I #1,542 1-------------1---- -"#Oyl $0 0 I pro -1-- #0 Of =n adnannlae=aanannaaal°a=aaanaaaG'=n-e=n TTLSs ---"-0 { #b00 #942 L pR CONSTRUCTION, 1==nran==aa7aaaeaal-naa . ROW, =eaaan=u b NOTES ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, 4 CIr7 OF DEN'r% CAPITAL IbIPROVEMENT PLAN 18-Jun-91 DATE i PROJECT DETAIL **####****####****#***##********#***s***#******#*#####**####**##**#********ORCN-NO*YEAR# q. PROJECT TITLE: ONLINE CATALOG PHASE 2 PROJECT 0070-02 1995 Month Year TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $311 Thousand TTL EST 1st YEAR 0&M COST; 0 Thousand EST START DATE: JAN 1996 TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: SEP 1996 .1, BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: HOUSED IN THE LIBRARY ACCESSIBLE BY F A COMPUTERIZED CATALOG OF ALL MATERIALS SEVERAL TERMINALS FOR PUBLIC AND STAFF USE. II, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: " AN ONLINE SYSTEM TO PROVIDE PATRON AND STAFF ACCESS TO ALL MATERIALS INSTEAD OF THE CARD CATALOG SYSTEMS, III, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital SEP 1996 _ Project Est 1st Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of ; 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Infl $ Total COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr $ Infl $ I Servlces: $0 OF 0% Personal Serv: $0 $0 $0 $0 j Land/ROW: 0 0 0% ( Supplies: 0 0 0 0 { Construction: 0 0 0% ; Maintenance: 00 O 00 0 - Equill wnt; 160 270 FI% Services: 0th is CONVERSI 5 6 3% ; 0th it XXXXXXX 0 O Q 0 E Oth 2: STAFF 30 35 16% ; 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 TOTAL (Thous): $185 $311 100% ; TOTAL (Thous):° J- $0_ $0_ _ _$a-_ $0- Y -0- rproof i IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR 1: 1995 YR TOTAL: $311 % YR TTL: 168% !NOV: 0 :DEC: 0 IJAN; 0 :FEB: 0 :MAR: 0 t ° OCT: 0 I 0 1AUG: 0 :SEP: 311 1. APR: 0 :MAY: 0 :JUN: 0 :JUL: 1 r : ....«.I YR 2: 1996 ' _ YR TOTAL: $ O % YR TTL: O% 0 :DEC: 0 :JAN; 0 :FES: 0 :MAR: 0 OCT; 0 :NCV: ISEP. 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 :JUN: 0 :JUL; 0 ;AUG: 0 i YR 3: 1997 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% 1 , OCT: 0 !,NOV: 0 :DEC: 0 :JAN: 0 :FEB: 0 ,MAR, 0 APR: 0 :MAY: 0 :JUN: 0 !JUL: 0 :AUG: 0 :SEP: 0 proof 0 V, FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand); :Auth & Unauth &I ! !SOURCE: XXXXXXXXI Sold !Unsold Unsold : Certificate I Operating I Aid in I YEAR YR GO Bond 100 Bond GO Bond :of Obligation; Revenue 1 Const Grant ~ TOTAL 1995 $0 : 30 $0 $o ; 0 : 0 0 311 1996 0: 0 311 0; 0, 0 0 0 1997 0: 0 0 0 I : $0 $0 : $0 $0 : $311 J i `I LS: $0 , $0 ^$3I1 , __.1_ roof 0,2 NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION, .327 ( 4 4, 27-Mar-Ri DATE er CITY OF DEMON CAPITAL IMPROVEMtP++ FLAN PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT Nt 0070-03 1995 wkkwk%♦wkwkkkwwk%%%k«"wPLAN w2wLIBRARY kBRANCH %wwkwwwkkkww%k%wwkw%+%*kwwkk*wkOmonth OkYEYear PROJECT TITLEI 3,764 Thousand JAN 1995 TL EST CAPITAL. COST' EST START DA7ft 1996 T TL Thousand SEP COMPL DATE' TTL EST 1st YEAR 0&M COST' EST 32! Thousand kkk%%kkkkwkwkwwilw~!%1E%NNitY%*%#%k'%%ilwwwk MiE iFw%iE 111F%%*1f%%%%%Y%%M%i'a 11M%wRiFiF%k%M%Yk%ih lF if %iFw if ik%%%%* TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST' BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS LIBRARY BRANCH LOCATED IN SCUTHEOFS30Da~d TEASLE LANE AND LILLIAN MILLER PARKWHY WITH AN ESTIMATED SIZE ' 11, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE' TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL LIBRARY SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS IN A HEAVILY POPULATED f REGION OUTSIDE OF THE CENTRAL AREA. post-Completion iDollars to Nearest Thousand)' --ESE-fst Yr Est Annual PROJECT BUDGET SEP 194 1 Est Capital I Project I Oper/Maint 0p er/Maint 71, fntl $ of 0 & M Intl $ Curr $ CAPITAL Expenditure I COST Curr f COST Curt $ Infl $ Total _42-_ -4_- 2- FF 14 189 4219 - Personal 5erv' ft84 2 f174----$1134 6% 2 2 Servici35i liest 0 OG I SuPP 1 1 0 132% 1 Maintenance' Lund/ROW' 2 2 400 3'168 , Construction' 2' 12% I Services' 1 1 1 1 I 0 3b0 432 75 96 75 9 Equipments 0 0 0% { Oth It BOOKS 0 0 0 0th 1s kkXXXXX 0 0 0% 1 0th 21 XXXXXXX _ _ ~ Oth 2' XXXXXXk I -M-4268» __4321- -$268 1381 - $31784 1007 1 TOTAL (Thuus)t TOTAL (Thous)t -$2P930 pL=GII537___"___ proof 0 1.. IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand)' - ]29/---------------- TTL' yR`-TOTAL'f3,784 O IMARt 0 19 0 IFEB' " YR It -1945 0 [DEC' 184 IJAN' 0 IEB 0 15Ept 31600 i- r OCT% 0 0 I I MAY NOVtS 0 IJUN' 0 IJULt 1-------------- APR' _ Y;t~ TOTAL' I $9 I G_ 1 YR TTLt Ok _ I 0 IMARt YR 2t- 144b _ 0 IDECt 0 IJAN' 0 IFEB' p ISEPs 0 0 INOVt 0 IJULt 0 IAUG1 APRs 0 IMAYt I--~_-_-----~I----- 0 + --------""Sd- 'G YR TTL' 0!, _ _I_____--- ___YP- ro7ALt 0 IMARt 997 0 {DECt 0 1JAN: 0 IFESt 0 ISEPt 0 ' YR 3tr- T9_9_7__ OM 0 {NOVi 0 IJULt 0 1AUGt 0 11UNe APRf 0 I I 0 YV. »FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand)' 150URC£t X%XkXXXXt YEAR th &I I in 1 IAuth & Unau I Certificate I Operating I Aid TOTAL Unsold 1 Sold iUnsold yR GO Bond 100 Bond GO Bond I 1 of Ohlia gtionl Revenue Const Grant I i fb00 $0 f0 I 3600 f4-I r~ 0 1 31B3rb ~ 1995- fb 1 I 0 I 0 p l 0 1996 0 1 0 30184 I 0 O I l 0 0 0 I 0 0 1 1997 _ _1- -`f0-1 f3~784 ; -1--- - -I-------___ 10-1 #0 I $0 0 -----30 { $600 i3i194 I ~_tltln{eeae=anaSnneleas=antlaaetleea==~ proof TTLSs NOM ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LANDt ROWo OR CONSTRUCTION, 328 tYt"' ~ i 19-Jun-9t 1991-96 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTiD r- ALL YEARS OR09S OPERA TOTAL lLL CAA7A1 AfAJHT Of10.49 cwES n>a r vECT Pf?OJW h M NUMOER - Derr PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1991-92; 244,000 15,000 122,000 107,000 PLANNING 0015-03 TFASLEY LANE LANDSCAPING PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1994-96t 99 38000 285,000 249,000 PLANNING 0016-02 LOOP 288 LANDSCAPING 40,000 6,000 45,000 39000 PLANNING 0016-08 LANDSCAPE FT, WORTH DR i j PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1998-98s 0 60,000 PLANNING 0018-01 PECAN CRK WATER PARK MSTR PLN 60,000 60.000 w ; 000 OTHER PROJECTS SUBMITTED; 484 009, 13,000 95,000 82317,,000 PLANNING 0048-04 LANDSCAPE 288 AND MCKINNk~(ST 73 ~ 390,000 PLANNING 0016-07 UNIVERSITY DR LANDSCAPING I l V k1:E3YF[ t~,l. . . er Y'.=L A. f I t S I \ j4r y wy t JECTS PROPOSED FOR 1991-92 PRO j ,i 331 fff{~!F .J 7 j I CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 27-Mar-91 DATE I PROJECT-"TAIL x##########* ******####*#***r**##**###*ORGN-NO*YEAR* PROJECT TITLE: TEASLEY NE LANDSCAPING PROJECT N: 0016-03 1991 TTL EST CAPITAL COST; $134 Thousand Month Year TTL EST 1st YEAR O&M COST: 16 Thousand EST START DATE: AUG 1991 ' TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: 16 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: JAN 1992 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPT ON. LANDSCAPE MEDIAN OF RECONS'rRU D_TEA~JSY<XNE FROM 135 TO LILLIAN MILLER BOULEVARD. II, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE; BEAUTIFICATION OF ONE OF THE CITY OF DENTON'S MAJOR ENTRYWAYS, AN EQUIVALENT AMOUNT WILL BE DONE BY THE HIGHWAY DEPT, III, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital JAN 1992 Project Est 1st Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Infl $ Total COST Curr $ Infl $ Cum ; Infl $ Services: $8 $8 6% Personal Serv: $0 $o $0 $0 j Land/ROW: 0 0 0% ; Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 56 66 42% ; Maintenance: 16 16 16 16 Equipment: 3 3 2% ; Services: 0 0 0 0 0th 1: BOTANIC 38 38 28% ; 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 2: CONCRETE 29 29 22% 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous): $134 $134 100% TOTAL (Thous): $18 $16 $16 $16 proofp= ~ f,. IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand); YR 1: 1991 YR TOTAL: $36 % YR TTL: 27% OC'r: 0 :NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 ;FEB: 0 ;MAR: 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 9 ;JUL: 9 ;AUG: 9 :SEP: 9 t,: f YR 2: 1992 YR TOTAL: $98 X YR TTL: 73% ' OCT: 9 ;NOV: 9 ;DEC: 9 ;JAN: 9 ;FEB: 9 ;MAR: 9 M APR: 9 ;MAY: 9 ;JUN: 9 ;JUL: 9 ;AUG: 8 ;SEP: 0 YR 3; 1993 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: O% j OCT: 0 ;NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 ;FEB: 0 ;MAR: 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 ;SEP: O proof 0 k V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): 'Auth & Unauth ;SOURCE: SDHPT 1 Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; Certificate ; Operating Aid in YEAR YR 00 Bond ;GO Bond GO Bond ;of Obligation; Revenue ; Const Grant ; TOTAL ` 1991 $0 ; $0 $67 $0 ; , ~ $G ~ $0 $67 $134 1992 0; 0 0; 0 0; 0 0' 0 1993 0 0 0; 0; 0 0 0 TTLS: $o ' $0 $87 $0 $0 $0 $67 $134 proof 0 NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION, 332 1 .r,' _ ii Sl SHAOOR. ALECRE VISTA G swr~ pp L4 _ 'i Ho►RRrs n ~ I~PfU r} H, a TO IP cp 3S ` E• w dt w ,rh\~ qq p ~ 'fa E , LOHOON4ERRY ;Rams cr, 41 Q / ` ~ ou of W f 1~1 J 3 ~yM11%1' a ~t L ssrL s Q~ s awt i s i wa Ll:~ ° ~ s qr• G 6 uT r r. ~ 'o I (A 1 r ma malro R o R RRIST RIO ° nom" G G l r I ~ i a l f j5'~3 333 I R j ?I a [t a+. j .M P ~ r i { T I M 334 I I _ I t 3 . kA i 33, i ff, I E PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1994-95 J r.~ I 335 1. f 1 i , CITY OF DENT ON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 27-Mar-91 DATE PROJECT--D TAIL #**#######****#*##x*##*#*tx#x#x#xx##; st*x***#~ ######*#**xxPROJECT#$x***#*0005VN00*YE1993 PROJECT TITLE: LOOP 2$8 LA ESCAPING Month Year TTL EST CAPITAL COST: 153 Thousand 1993 12 Thousand EST START DATE: FEB TTL EST tst YEAR 0&M COST: 12 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: JUL 1994 TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: I, BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: LANDSCAPE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF LOOP 288 FROM 135 To FM 426 (McKINNEY STREET) IT, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: OF A EQUIVALENT TAMOUNT VILLJBE BORNENBY TINTHEOHIGHWAYTHE 01 AN r , III, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion 1994 Est Capital , Est 1st Yr Est Annual - Project Q & M 4perlMafnt Oper/Maim f CAPITAL Expanditl Total al COST Curr S Infl $ Curr $ Infl $ COST Curr Inf Personal Serv: $0 $0 $0 $0 Services: - EB 0% Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Land/Row: 0 0 36 22% ; Maintenance: it 12 0 0 rd Construction: 3 11 12 Equipment: 6 7 7 g 4% 52% ; Se0thrvi1:ces; XXXXX%X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0th It BOTANIC 72 ' 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 2: CONCRETE 22 23 16% i- X12 i2 $ij ' TOTAL (Thous): .`1139 $150 100% TOTAL (Thous): $11 $ proof 0 IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR TOTAL: $72 % YR TTL: 47% YR 1: 1993 OCT: 0 ,Nov: 0 :DEC: 0 :JAN: O :FEB: g !SAP: 9 APR; 9 iMAY; 9 :JUN: 9 :JUL: 9 :AUG: i R 2-: 1-994 YR TOTAL 8 % YR TTL: 53% $ Y OCT; 3 :NOV; 8 :DEC: 8 :JAN: 8 :FEB: 8 :MAR: 'AUG: 0 :SE P: 0 APR: 8 :MAY: 8 :JUN: 8 !JUL: 8 : , YR 3: 1995 YR ITOTALI $0 X YR TTL; O% 0 OCT: 0 !NOV: 0 :DEC: 0 ',JAN: 4 :FEB: 0 ;MAR: APR: 0 :MAY: 0 :JUN: 0 JUL: 0 1AUG: 0 Opt proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): SOURCE: SDHPT : ,Auth & Unauth C Aid in ; TYEAR OTAL Sold :Unsold Unsold Certificate ; Operating , YR GO Bond :GO Bond GO Bond :of Obligation: Revenue : Const Grant , $0 $0 $76 , 1993 0 $0 $77 :~$0 l i Q Q $153 o. { 1994 0: 0 0' 0 0 0 0 1995 _ 76 $153 { TTLS: $0 $0 proof -0,08 " NOTE: -ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. ; 336 i r S 1 t, UL 177, 7 7 J w C xwNfr { PRAI r l~ I t ~nr IT z J's ~r fir., + -1 WA A Y OAKS OR. l § ? 6 4 tl•JC• q4 caar j Am. 10°° as f, 1 v' Q ou 1 1 ,..J ~....1r luorraa ~+vt ~~.ai.J Jf ! 11 v 1 ti ' tl~ OOU► M ~ ~MUOII►/ - ' YO ~EIt0 t 0 D15 2 Ao 337 ~tf~ y A a CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 27-Mar-91 DATE { PROJEOT-DETAIL **######*#*#####*#t#*######**#**##*xx #i###x###*#*#* x*###x#PROJECTEN*# 0: 0016-08 PROJECT TITLE: FORT WORTH DRIVE Month Year, TTL EST CAPITAL COST; 74 Thousand TTL EST 1st YEAR 0&M COST: 5 Thousand EST START DATE: JAN 11992 993 TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: 5 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: AUG ####*#######**###*#**###############*#####x###### ###x#########x######################t*tf I. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: LANDSCAPING OF FORT WORTH DRIVE, FROM COLLINS TO I-35 II, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: BEAUTIFICATION BE FORTHCOMING OD FROM N THE ENTRANCEWAY. HIGHWAY Y DEPARTMENT. AMOUNT WILL Post-Completion III, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand); AUG 1993 Est Capital Est 1st Yr Est Annual Pro)tu ; 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint CAPITAL Expend iture % of COST Curr Infl $ Total COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr $ ihfl $ Services; Personal Serv: $0 $4 $O $D i.. $5 $5 O% { Supplies: 0 0 1 Land/ROW: 0 O : 5 5 5 5 Construction: 27 29 39% MaiServintences:ance O O 6 0 Equipment: 7 7 10% ' 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 1 0th 1: BOTANIC 10 11 14% ' 0th 2: CONCRETE 21 22 30% Oth 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 G 0 + ~ - 74 100% ; TOTAL (Thous): $5 TOTAL (Thous): $70 $ $5 $5 $6 _ , proof 0 IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand):r^ YR TOTAL: $36 % YR TTL: 40% YR 1: 1992 FEB: 4 :MAR: 4 OCT: 0 !NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 :JAN: 4+ 4 ;SEP: APR: 4 :MAY: 4 'JUN: 4 1JUL,. 4 1AUG; + , - ' YR TOTAL: $38 % YR TTL: 52% ;FEB: 4 ;MAR: 3 {R` i993 I JAN,. 4 ,JAN: OCT: 4 :NOV: 4 ,DEC: 3 'JUL: 3 :AUG: 3 :SEP: 0 APR: 3 :MAY; 3 ;JUN: , YR 3- 1g4 TOTAL; $0 % YR TTL: " YR OCT: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 !FEB: 0 MAR: 0 0 ;SEP: 0 APR: 0 :MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 :JUL; 0 ~AUG: , proof,. V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): SOURCE: SDHPT ;Ruth & Unauth YEAR , Sold ;Unsold Unsold : Certificate 1 OPevenueg Aid in Grant TOTAL Congt yR GO Bond :00 Bond GO Bond ,of Obligation, 1992 $0 : $0 $37 I $O 1 0 0 p 0 ' 1993 0 0 0: 0 0: 0 0 0 i 1994 0 : 0 : : i 0 ' $0 $37 : SO : $0 $0 $37 $74 T7LS: $-z=__ proof 0.36 NOTE; ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION, .338 ~a i S t~ j ME. tJl~ w, oAK ~0 Q a~ (o~AK~ AK t LiLII ILI HICKORY 0 w a ICKOR L_0 W W, HICK f~►w ' a W HiCr!(G+RY~~~ ❑ Q C3 oowN wN UNI V ll! 4 ~m Ana LW i E L~7~ EAGLE ~ILL• FHIN 30 "c ty ' y/asT 0/ , ALEGR o F , p WILLGWwGOD l ~l~t----- r T i AQ g N L_ J m PA VIN (3 wsur w AA 1011 339 µ-LC-I`~ i.\1 1. _ S _ 1 ~y } ~ FF f} i-. n~.C~ r-- t ,a i n i i f a 1 Q _ . i P i s F.. ji 1 + I i. 6.. i. n.. I I 340 I t e~AA 1 _ I 1 I I 1 i l 1 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1995-96 i f a . I 341 1 1 f p :5 s7 CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 27-Mar-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL *####*#*k**#k#*###*#*####**#R*#*###*#t**#**#4*t#kx#*t#*t#x###*##*#s####*##*ORGN-NOtYEAR# PROJECT TITLE: PECAN CR WATER PARK MASTER PLAN PROJECT N: 0016-01 1992 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $50 Thousand Month Year TTL EST 1st YEAR O&M COST; 0 Thousand EST START DATE: FEB 1992 TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST; 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: AUG 1993 " I. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DESIGN A SCENIC PARK BASED ON HISTORICAL DESIGN IN THE PECAN CREEK WATERSHED, II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: BEAUTIFICATION OF ONE OF DENTON'S MOST V18IRLE SITES III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital AUG 1993 Project Est 1st Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure X of 0 & M Oper/Haint Oper/Maint I COST Curr $ Infl $ Total COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr $ Infl Services: $50 $60 100% Personal Serv: $0 $0 $0 $0 Land/ROW: 0 0 0% ; Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 0 0 0% ; Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 0% ; Services: 0 0 0 0 0th is BOTANIC 0 0 0% ; 0th is XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0; 0th 2; CONCRETE 0 0 0% ; 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous): $50 $60 100% ; TOTAL (Thous): $0 $0 $0 $0 proof 0 IVY FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): i YR 1; 1992 YR TOTAL: $28 % YR TTL; 56% OCT: 0 :NOV: 0 :DEC: 0 :JAN: 0 :FEB: 0 ;MAR: 41 i APR: 4 :MAY: 4 :JUN: 4 :JUL: 4 :AUG: 4 :SEP: 4 YR 2: 199T' YR TOTAL: $22 X YR TTL: 44% OCT: 4 :NOV: 4 :DEC: 4 :JAN: 4 :FEB: 3 :MAR: 3;,_ APR: 0 :MAY: 0 :JUN. 0 :JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 :SEP: 0 YR 3: 1994y YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% OCT: 0 !NOV: 0 :DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 :FEB: 0 ;MAR: 0'- APR: 0 :MAY: 0 :JUN: 0 :JUL: 0 :AUG: 0 :SEP: 0 - , proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Auth & Unauth :SOURCE: XXXXXXXX Sold :Unsold Unsold : Certificate : Opere'.ing : Aid in : YEAR YR 00 Bond :GO Bond GO Bond :of Obligation; RGvenue Const Grant TOTAL" { 1992 SO : $0 $50 : $0 $0 : $0 So $50; 1993 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 0: 0 E 1994 0 0 0: 0 0; 0 0: 0 TTLS: $0 : $0 $60 : $0 $0 : $0 $0 ; 350; =:»a:»_:» a»»e- -.cc».»»::a:-'-»_»»»»_:».-'-n»»a»=»:r.»»---- proof 0- NOTE: `ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. - 342 vi WTI" FaQ mm a 0 LA HWY. 380 0 rau CAWUI VAYM L4 ME A cc IL-j z LJ PAIS F11 LU N OAK am OA71 I K R DOWN WN PR CA F vi 343 1 1 i t E-. i G i i i f 344 l r i F j I; tp i I { I i r 1 i E I OTHER PROJECTS SUBMITTED IW 345 L ~-rte 9J CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 27-Mar-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT TITLE: LANDSCAPE 288 AND MCKINNEY PROJECT 0-NO*YE1994 TTL EST CAPITAL COST; q; 0015-04 ;164 Thousand Year TTL EST 1st YEAR 0&M COST: Month Year 3 Thousand EST START DATE: FE8 1994 j TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST; 113 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: AUG 1995 I, BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: LANDSCAPING OF A MAJOR INTERSECTION II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE; BEAUTIFICATION OF A MAJOR FOCAL POINT OF TWO ENTRANCEWAYS. AN EQUIVALENT PORTION WILL BE FORTHCOMING FROM THE HIGHWAY DEPT. III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand); Est Capftal Post-Completion Project I AUG 1995 CAPITAL Expenditure % of Est 1st Yr Est Annual COST Curr $ infl ; Total 1 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr $ Infl Services: $6 $8 6% ! Personal Serv; $0 Land/ROW: 0 0 0% Supplies; 0 $0 $0 $0 Construction: 63 78 45% ; Maintenance: 11 13 111 13 Equipment: 14 16 10% Services: 0 1 0th 1: BOTANIC 31 36 22% 0 0 0 Oth 2: CONCRETE 24 26 17% ' Oth 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0, 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 ' TOTAL (Thous): $140----;184 100% TOTAL (Thous): $11 - - ;13 ;11 ;13 proof 0 - -L _ IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): F YR 1: 1994 YR TOTAL: $72 % YR T TL: TL. 4% OCT: 4 0 NOV: I 0 :DEC: , 0 IJAN: 0 'FEB: 9 ;MAR: 9...,, APR: 9 :MAY: 9 ;JUN: 9 JUL: 9 AU' 1: 9 :SEP: YR 2: 1995 OCTt 9 ;NOV: Y9 ;DECAL; a 9 ;JAN; 9 YFEB TL. 56X 8 ;MA12:~ gig, APR: 8 ;MAY: 8 ;JUN: 8 W UL, 8 ;AUG: 8 :SEP: 0 I I YR- 3 1996 YR TOTAL: $0 ' OCT; 0 ;NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: % YR TTL: 0% APR: 0 'MAY: 0 ;FEB: 0 ;MAR: 01 0 ,JUN: 0 :JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 JSEP: 0 V. FUNDINU SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand); Proof 0 , !Auth & Unauth &; ;SOURCE: SOAPT YR 00 Sold ~ Bond 100 Bond 00 Bond ~ofeObligation! ORevenueg ; CAid onstn YEAR Grant TOTAL 1.. 1'994 $0 ; $0 1995 0 . 0 $82 $0 $0 $0 ;82 $164 1996 0 1' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TTLS, ' ' LL $o $0 $82 $o I ' $o $o $62 ' $164 ' NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION, proof -0,03' 346 3 1 :~a1.rJ F j is CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 27-Mar-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL ****z**zzzx*z*zzz***zxzz**z**z****zzz***zz**zzzzz*zzzz**z*z**z*****z**z*zzzpRQN-NOzYEARz PROJECT TITLE: UNIV OR (HWY 380) LANDSCAPE PROJECT 0: 0015-07 i995 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $347 Thousand Month Year i TTL EST 1st YEAR 0&M COST: 25 Thousand EST START DATE: JAN 1995 TTL EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: 25 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: AUG 1996 «x*x~«*czxz«x*:x*z*z*z******z******z***zxezzzxzz**z**z***z*zz**zz*z*z**azz***z****xz***z*a 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: EXTENSION OF LANDSCAPING OF A PORTION OF UNIVERSITY DRIVE. 11, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: CONTINUATION OF THE BEAUTIFICATION OF UNIVERSITY DRIVE A -r MAJOR ENTRANCE. ( III, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion ! Est Capital AUG 1996 .l Project ; Est 1st Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of ; 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Infl $ Total COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr $ Infl $ 1 Services: $11 $11 4% ; Personal Serv: $0 $O $0 $0 Land/ROW: 0 0 0% ; Supplies: 0 0 0 0; Construction: 137 181 49% ; Maintenance: 21 260 21 20 " Equipment: 33 40 12% ; Services: 0 ~A Oth 1: BOTANIC 70 84 26% ; 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 2: CONCRETE 28 31 10% 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 j TOTAL (Thous): $279 5347 100% TOTAL (Thous): $21 -$26 $21 $26 proof r- 0 IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR TOTAL: $180 X YR TTL: 46% YR 1995 r OCT: 0 ;NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 18 ;FEB: 18 :MAR; 18 APR: 18 ;MAY: 18 ;JUN: 18 ;JUL: 18 ;AUG: 17 ;SEP: it YR 2: 1996 YR TOTAL: $187 % YR TTL: 54% OCT: 17 ;NOV: 17 ;DEC: 17 ;JAN: 17 ;FEB: 17 ;MAR: t7 APR: i7 ;MAY: 17 ;JUN: 17 ;JUL: 17 ,AUO: 17 ;SEP: 0 YR 3: 1997 YR TOTAL: SO % VR TTL: 0% OCT: 0 :NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 ;FEB: 0 ;MAR: 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 ;SEP: 0 proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): 'SOURCE: SDHPT ;Ruth & Unauth &; 1 Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; Certificate ; Operating ; Aid in ' TYEAR OTAL YR 00 Bond ;GO Bond GO Bond ;of Obligation; Revenue ; Const Grant i -f SO ; $0 $173 ; 1995 $0 i $0 $174 i $0 i $347 - 1996 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1991 o ; ° ° ; ° j ° j ° ° - p $0 $O $173 ; $347 iTLS: $0 ; $0 $174 $ proof 0.2 NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION, 347 NINE i t LDD)l ~ r^ i i ti- i i r. i { 348 i I, } E}hSlFSI R r 1991-96 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 14-Jun-91 LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED I ALL YEARS - - ~ QJ#Ol4S OPIDi 6 TOTAL NET Aec"STM0 PAOVECIF Poax-or OAAfrAL AMINr WJi= rAMAL { DEPT Ak#AMW NAME Cosr COST coor coa PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1995-96: PARKS & REO 00W41 POOH RENOVATIONIEXPANSION 1,884,000 60,000 1941,000 1,884,000 PARKS & REC 008342 PARK RENOVATION 330,000 35,000 365,000 330,000 OTHER PROJECTS SUBMITTED: PARKS & REC 006341 PARKS RENOVATION PROJECT 1,320,000 0 1,320,000 1,320,000 I PARKS & AEC 0002-01 NEW ROOFS 706,000 0 706,000 706,000 PARKS 8, REC 0002-02 HVAC COMPUTER CONTROLS 235,000 0 295.000 235,000; w t I E E ~Ftb ' i 1 I if i I }}k I { 1 1 i Ii i l r-, 1 i t PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1995-96 4 r_ , x j j ' j j I 351 IT1' OF DENT1}S k,APITAL IlIPROVE)IENT PLAN 1pr-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL. k>R******~*x**********.k~k.**M******#x**k*.r~*k*****,k*+**k*x****#~*kx**.k**##*#**ORG~-\0#1L.SR~ ,I PROJECT TITLE: POOL RENOVATION/EXPANSION PROJECT z: 0060-01 1995 TTL ESr CAPITAL COST: 51,881 Thousand Mont 11 i:"11, TTL ES'f Ist YEAR 001 COST: GU Thuusaud F5T START D:It TE; n^T 1-115 TTL EST ANNUAL O&M COST: 60 'fitousatrd 1" 5'r l'ONPI. DAH: MAY 199i *4*4***kkkX.k*##Ak##*k**M.kYt,k#$##**.k~'.EX#t#k#4#**#**4##*#*#$**##M#Y*4*#$#***#*kk:kMkX###***~k# ,rt". 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTIOS: This project 1, Lit allocr tut' tltu :I muL•tr ,%.3lu%ation of the esisLinLy puoL facilit} and Lhe addit.iun of a zero-dopth pool and dkin¢ Neil. It. PROJECTED PROJECT Iq-.XFFITSiPt'RP05F: Frlhanced recl,eat.ional I6r,rmmin ) uppurtunitless for Denton ciLizeus and rl=no~ation of a fal;tiih)' that. was c•unstructed in 1966 ,uld is in very poor c"odition. III, PROJECT BUDGET :Dollarm: to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital MAY 1991 r 111-)iect ; Est 1st Yr Est Annual CAPITA I. FspundLture % of ; U h ?f Opel,/MaIat 0 pel,/?1ainL COST Curl, S I11l'1 $ Total COST Curl, S I01 S Curr $ Inf1 S Sere ices: $0 SO 0% Personal Sere: 915 S17 $15 Sli E.r Land/ROW: 0 0 0% SuppLies: 5 G 5 6 Construction: 1,200 11584 80% ; Maintenance: 10 12 10 12 Equipment: 300 300 20% ; Services: 20 24 20 2.1 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% 0th I: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 I 0th 2': XXXXXXX 0 0 0,% 0th 2: XCXXXXX 0 0 0 0 rW TOTAL (Thous): $1,500 $1,881 100% TOTAL {Thous}: S50 $60 $30 900 proof 0 It'. FUNDING REOCIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousandl: 1'R 1: 1995 YR TOTAL: S1,884 % V'R TTL: lOD% OCT: 1,884 :NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 :FEB: 0 :MAR: 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 :AUG: 0 :SEP: 0 - 1'R 2: 1996 1'R TOTAL: s0 % YR TTL: 0% OCT: 0 :NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 :FEB: 0 ;MAR: 0 APR: 0 !MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 :AUG: 0 :SEP: 0 1'R 3, 1997 1'R TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% OCT: 0 ;NOV: 0 :DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 ;FEB: 0 :MAR: 0 „ APR: 0 ;NAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 ;SEP: 0 I' proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES IDollarr to Nearest Thousand): ;Ruth k Unauth h: ; ,SOURCE: XXXXXXXX; Sold :Wisoid Unsold : Certificate ; Operating : Aid in : PEAR YR GO Bond 100 Bond GO Bond ;of Obllgat-on : Revenue ; Const Grant ; TOTAL 1995 SO ; SO 81,884 s0 ; $0 ; $0 SO ; $1,884 1996 0: 0 0; 0; 0' 0 0 , 0 1997 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 O: 0 I 1 I I TTLS: $ O ; SO 51,884 SO ; $0 ; s0 s0 ; $1,884 _o___ea oe..=as-ad_^z_aasoe_~___-'a.03OC9~S4.71 _ -__~_e_ae~~da proof 0 NOTE: ATTACK SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR C'ON'STRUCTION, 352 J r .t; °+i~.,,r., k+,µ• ~~:y.. - - tee,-,~~ SES. I ~ _ hI ~ ter- ~ , - • , I F III rw I :r Ir., Y „k v t 4r t ! i -•~__~_us~.-~-..,o a, s.. ~ 1 L.,: i.>.=~ti ~ _ I.~a ,P'N~r ..C: - wy , t (TJ! i~ I~ - ~ l.keai -ri -LAW F 1::.. ~ ydl~- ,i 'lit ~.,r~✓yY 9y~ _ 4__. a ~ p y tit t i I i ,seal ~ O O ~ 1 -I'll 11 + r / r 1 1r I .a.1 ~ 1 4ft rJ / % 1 1.. moo • q 'W / r~ i _l,l i w w r r L OF D29610M, TElfA1 r I 1 % A 6 it C D t 3~i3 H if J l y i pl 1 "AT, ] I f PROJECT DETAfi. x##***#*##**##*x*sx#*x##*#x##$#x#*x##########x$###x###*###*xPROJECT*a#***##0063-20#YE1995 PROJECT TITLE: SCHOOL PRACTICE FIELDS Month Year x33110118anrl 1995 TTL EST CAPITAL COST 35 Tltousaitcl EST START DATE. MAR TTL EST Ist YEAR O&M :-OSI": 33 Thousand EST COKPL DATE: JUNE 1991 ITT. EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: 1• BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Development of selected athletic 1'i-:ids at selected elemental,} schools for practice fields to be used by youth athletic teams. It, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PI:RFOSF: Enhance the opportunities tot' south athletic teams to practice on safe and adequate sized I'ields' F Post-Comp let ton Ill, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand)t Co 199 Project - Est ojecLal ESC 1st Yr Est Annual 0 & M Oper/,MainL Opcrhtaint CAPITAL Expenditure % of COST Curr $ Infl S Curl, S Ihfl S F i COST Curt 5 1nt1 S Total - Personal Serv; $21 521 S21 S21 Serv ices: S0 s0 Land/ROM': 0 0 D% Supplies: 2 'L 2 Construct ton: 0 _ 6 Equipment, 251) 330 100% Maintenance: I 1 1 0 0 0% Services: 1 1 Gth t: ,1'xX!(X1S u D o% otlt 1. rSX:is1z G 0 0 D 0 0 0 0% ; Oth 2: xCx1x1S 0 0th 'l: 11XY\%\ 0 - - SW S35 S~0 ti))p 100% TOTAL {Thous) TOTAL {Tho,ls): x'30 _ - =----J= ~ ` 'pruof :i N1 IV, FUNDING REAL'IREMEN'YS (Dutlavs ti, Nearest Thousand): - YR TTL: 100% 1'R TOr.YL: 53:3, OCT: ;~lAk; 330 1. 1995 'f: 0 ;501': 0 .DEC' U ;JAN: 0 ,FED: APR: 0 ISEP: 0 0 MAY 0 ;JUN: 0 JUL: 0 AUG: 1'R 2` 1996 YR TOTAL: SO % Y'R TTL: 0%~ M.AR 0 I OCT: U 'NOV: 0 DEC: 0 JAN: 0 :FEB: 0 APR,. 0 .lAY 0 ;MAR; _E : 0 1 1R 3: 1397 Y' R TOTAL: $O % YR TTL: ;yAR: 0 iWT: 0 I\qY': 0 :DEC• U ;JAS: 0 :FEB: 0 0 15EP: 0 APR U !MAY': 0 JUN: 0 0 ~AIG: - - - 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): SOURCE: ,YfC1XY1X1 Auth & Criauth YEAR Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; Certificate Operating Aid in YER TOTAL YR GO Bond :GO Bond GO Bond for Obligation; Revenue i Const Grant _ 5U S0 -------so $330 $0 1996__._ S0 0 0 0 0 { 199, 0 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 1991 , I , ~ ~ , SU ~ $O $0 ~ 5330 TTLS: - SO SU $330 80 proof 0 NOTE: -ATTACH SITE -NAPyIF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION, 354 ( i rt 'S I •1 Ile I , i T Lim. ' ~ ♦ Jt' ~ k 1 ~ n e ~ ay. 1 M :~s4+-jl ,rai' •e.~~~~'r~~,. I~',~f 'i`-_-a ti ` ~iiiT~ J tt s:liy. f~" r'►TMII r' Jy I r 40 yyy+++~~~ P ~i n ~ra wolf Er! Tp•r w~b-,.~ ,a..r^~~' p/ V 1~~1 { l~~ 1:' : it/~y, ,.r► '~~"ra !nl yt J 'r~ ✓J~ I V Stan es.'iIC. f' + ` • ~"u 1i~~ ~ mod' a ! LWWI 40 Pr!~ i 1 ~~}3 ~ 64 1 ~ i i _ oIvy op ONOTON+ rax►~ , ! J 1 p 355 L r - i y I 1 i:. 356 i t ~55 J f i 1 t i a t r OTHER S PROJECTS SUBMITTED s i 1 i J 357 E r s +".tFI'T I?1PRf'CE?1bST PL:\: [ T1 iF DE.`,T3ti AL pR(}JECT DETAIL PROJECT A: UOG3-O1 199a ##$#$#$#$#***$##xx**xxx####*#*#~OtiAT[0`S*PROJECT #*#####~##***$#*$#$#####$#$*URlontft *lEl'ear w, PAR&s RE. 1995 PROJECT TITLE: COST S1 ,:320 Thousand EST STAR'[ JAN TTL EST C'IPITAL 0 'Thousand DATE: EST COMPL DATE: JUNE 1997 LTL EST 1. YEaf. UR`I COST: ` 0 Thousand 1.,. TTL EST ASNUAL 0!;?1 f,i~5'1: $####*$#$###$##$x#k#~##$.kY$####*#Yk$##$$$#*#$####$#$###$#######$**$#llds### thl et i C I. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIP[IOS rU : _Nisting park areas to include playa To provide renovation Cu cartons tstems, tennis courts, and landscaping. fields, rest room facilities, irrigation s.'• [ 1(, PROJEC""TED PROJECT B1:\F,FITS/ PLRIOSE: Preser"Atiott of existing r,;creatlonal facilities tO restore them to their ori;inal v.11ue to enhance tho u,.talitr of life for Dr:ntu❑ citizens. Post-Completion _ Co i99T ~i III. PROJECT A1'DGET ,Dollars to Nearest Thousand) : '-JFat lst Yp EstaRttual.... Est Capit+tl Oler/?Saint Pto.i~.ct 0 ~i Uper/Kaint T Cu.\ $ % of COST Curr S Infl S Curr $ lnfi 5 CAPITAL lltl'1 S Total rv° E\Tr:ndtttt'e c COST s0 50 SO Setclees: Personal Serv: 0 0 Supplies: Q j U U 0% ~ 0 Land/ROW: 100% Kaintenance: 0 0 0 0 0 r U Construction: 1,000 1'320 0 Services: F.0l Rent: XX1SS\C 0 0 0th l: SXI M U 0 I} 0th It 0 0 U ` 1 0th 12: CC\1K1t O 0th 2. 11XNSIS 0 0 ~ - yU~ a0 a0 T- LOU% TOTAL (Thous): a0- 1 j TOT:1L lThuusS; -SIMO -sl-SSG- - proof 0- ! t .I : 14'. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS ITiollars to Nearest Thousand): - c 50% 0 , I 5660 , r. YR TO U ,JAN: 660 iFES: 0 MAR: - - - TA[. : 1'R 1: 1930 0 .DEC. OCT: 0 X04' 0 ;JUL. 0 :AUG: 0 ,SEP: 0 0?Idl': 0 % YR TM 50% APR: 1996 1'R TOTA_~L: - - $660 - - k14R: ;NOY : 0 . DEC: 0 JAN: 860 FEA 1'R 2: OUT: 0 0 ,SEP: 0 JUN: 0 ,JUL: 0 1 AU O : t p , _ r_---------..i-_--_._-- _ n - YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0 ,>fAR APR; 1991 0 ;JAN: 0 1FEB: 'SEPt 0 : 0 1MAYt 0 IDEC: 0 1JVL: 0 ;AUG: 0 APR roof 0 C, FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): 15OURCE:%h111%S; YEAR ,Ruth & Cnauth k1 ' 1 sold 1Unsold Unsold Certificate 1 Operating t Aid in GO Bond Go florid 1of Oltl.igation ; Revenue ; Collet Grant TOTAL 1•R GO Bond , $660 $0 i $0 ii 66U 1995-- to i s00 $660 0 0 0 0 0 i 1346 0 0 0 0 1997 0 1 S0 -$0_ S1,3 0 ---SD iI - SD $1,320 i $D i nano-aa.:~'-xa_~eaaca'.asyce: pCUOf CTLS: VOTE: ATTACK SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND. OR CONSTRUCTION, 358 I CITY OF DENTON' CAPITAL IMPRO4DIENT PLAN 27-Mar-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL t**********##*#***#s**#****#***#*##**t*#***#**#*********##**#***##*********ORGN-NO*YEAR* PROJECT TITLE: NEW ROOFS PROJECT 0: 0002-01 1995 T'fL EST CAPITAL COST: $706 Thousand Month Year TTL EST 1st YEAR 0&M COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: MAY 1995 TTL EST ANNUAL 00i COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: OCT 1997 ANNUAL 00i CO** ******##*****#*.t**.#*###*##*#***# { 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: I Complete re-roof (new) nine City facilities, Ist year - Library, Visual Art, "ire j Station; 2nd year - Denia, `forth Lakes, Civic Center; 3rd - Police, Senior Gtr, - I _ 11, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: No leaks or damage to the interior of buildings, protection of City assets, extend the life of the building by 15 years, III, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital OCT 1997 Project Est 1st Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Infl $ Total COST Curr $ Intl S Curr $ Intl s m; Services: s0 $0 0% Personal Serv: $0 $0 $0 -$0 Land/ROW: U 0 0% Supplies: 0 0 0 0 4 Construction: 535 706 100% Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 0% services: 0 0 0 0 rv; Equipment: 0 0 Oth 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 O 0 0 - 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% Oth 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 • r TOTAL (Thous): $530 $706 100% 1OTAL (Thous): s0 s0 SO $0 proof 0 i IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR 1: - 1995 YR TOTAL: $344 % YR TTL: 49% OCT: 0 ;NOV: 0 (DEC: 0 !JAN: 0 :FEB: 0 :MAR: 0 ( j APR: 0 :MAY: 344 :JUN: 0 :JUL: 0 :AUG: 0 (SEP: 0 - 1'R 2: -1996 YR TOTAL: $294 % YR TTL: 42% OCT: 294 :NOV: 0 :DEC: 0 iJA4: 0 ,FEB: 0 ,MAR: 0 APR: 0 :MAY: 0 :JUN: 0 :J'JL: 0 !AUG, 0 !SEP. 0 YR 3: 1997 YR TOTAL: $68 % YR TTL: 10% i OCT: 68 ;NOV: 0 :DEC: 0 :JAN: 0 ;FEB: 0 ,MAR: 00 APR: 0 )MAY: 0 :JUN: 0 :JUL: 0 ;AUG: O :SEP: , - ' - - - proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollar'] to Nearest Thousand): SOURCE: 1%XXXXXX :Ruth & UnauLh Sold :Unsold Unsold : Certificate : Operating : Aid in i YEAR YR GO Bond :GO Bond GO Bond :of Obligation: Revenue 1 Const Grant TOTAL 1995 $0 $0 $0 : $344 $0 I $0 SO 29.1 ; 0 0! 1996 0; 0 294 0 i i--- 1997 0: 0 0! 68 i 0 0 0 68 $0 $0 s0 $706: SO I $OM SQ : si0ri TTLS, 'ea==o= i. ===n=======i==-===s====9i=_x=====acc:xaav= proof -0,2 NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 1 359 i t4 t::~.ry 1 IT%' OF DF.NTON CAPITAL IMPROYEME%T PLAN 27-Mar-J1 DATE PROJECT DETAIL' PROJECT TITLE: HVAC COMPUTER CONTROLS PROJECT a: 0002-02 1995 TTL EST CAPITAI. COST: $236 Thousand Month Year TTL EST Ist YEAR O&M COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: MAR 1993 TTL EST ANNUAL. O&M COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: JUNE 1997 " 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This would allow computer HVAC controls on Denla, North Lakes, Police Station, Service Center, MLE Center. 11, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: Would provide energy management controls and would be more cost effective, III, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital _ JUNE 1997 Project ; Est 1st Yr Est Annual r CAPITAL Expenditure % of ; 0 & M Oper%Maint Oper/Malnt COST Curr $ Infl $ Total ; COST Curr $ InfI $ Curr $ Intl $ Services: ~$0 $0 0% Personal Serv: ~ $0 ~~$0 $0 so Land/ROW: 0 0 0% Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 178 235 100% ; Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 I Equipment: 0 0 0% Services: 0 0 0 0 rte, r 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; 0th L XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 ! 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; Oth 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL IThousl: $l'8 $235 100% TOTAL (Thous): $0 $0 s0 $0 proof 0 IV. FUNDING REQUIRENEN'TS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): ' 1'R is 1995 1'R TOTAL: $69 % YR TTL: 2111% OCT: 0 iNOV: 0 DEC: 0 :JAN: 0 :FEB: 0 :MAR: 69 APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 ;AUO: 0 !SEP: 0 YR 2: 1996 YR TOTAL: $166 % YR TTL: 71% OCT: 0 !NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JOIN: 0 ;FEB: 0 ;MAR: 0 ' APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 166 ;JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 ;SEP: 0 YR 3t 1997 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% OCT: 0 :NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 ,FEB: 0 ;MAR: 0 APR: 0 ,KAY: 0 ;JUN: C ,`JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 ;SEP: 0 - - - proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Auth & Unauth &; ;SOURCE: XXXXXXXX; YEAR Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; Certificate Operating ; Aid in YR GO Bond ;GO Bond GO Bond ;of Obligation; Revenue ; Const Grant ; TOTAL 1995 $0 $0 SO ; $69 $0 $0 $0 ; $69 1996 0; 0 0 166 0; 0 0 1660' 1991 0 0 0; 0 0; 0 0 I TTLS: $0 i $0 SO $235 $0 $0 $0 $235 proof 0004 NOTE: -ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. - 360 I 1 ! II , 1991-96 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 14-Jun-91 LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (ALL YEARS) - p!#OSS UPEfid TOTAL NET EOVESRNO PF4 WF PRQlECT COMAL MAWT GFM$ CANTAL r DEPT ER NAME wsr Carr COST COST LR E PROJECTS SUBMITTED: 1 ,676,000 1,675,000 FIRE 0050-01 FIRE-POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM 14576,000 0 6,000 295,000 575,0 FIRE 0050-02 OUTDOOR WARNING SYSTEM 289 ,000 0 21160$000 9002,160,000 FIRE 0050-03 RELOCATE $L COMBINE ST 1 A ST 3 2,1,000 0 663,000 663,000 FIRE 0050-04 REBUILD ST 4 - PRESENT SITE ~1~ 0 ~ ~ M FIRE 0050-05 RENOVATE ST 2 0050-06 FIRE TRAINING CENTER 2,400,000 72,000 7,472,000 2,400,000 ;t FIRE i FIRE 0050-07 PILOT KNOB FIRE STATION 1,250,000 1,306,000 2,5581000 14250,000 0050-06 MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FIRE STATION 1,260,000 1,326,000 2,575,000 1,250,000 FIRE 1,250,000 1,306,000 2,556,000 1,260,000 rn FIRE 0050-09 LAKEYIEW FIRE STATION 1 ~ FIRE 0050-10 SOUTHVIEWFIRE STATION 1,250,000 1,306,000 2,558,000 1,250,000 t i d 1 i _i OTHER PROJECTS SUBMITTED 5 Ia t r { i i , i I~ IV ~jj 363 t 3 j CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 09-Apr-91 RATE " PROJECT DETAIL *###*##**#*****#**#**##**##***#*##*#**#*****#k##~c*#***#***#*#***#*#*******#**ORGN-NO*YEAR# PROJECT 4: 0050-01 1992 FIRE-POLICE COMPU'T'ER SYSTEM Month Year PROJECT TITLE; COST, $1,575 Thousand Jan 1992 TTt, EST CAPITAL 0 Thousand EST START DATE; JUNE 1992 TTL EST 1st YEAR 0&H COST: 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: a* TTL EST ANNUAL, 0" COST i 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ,omputer and !IDT system for fire and police. k l 1[. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: Lomputer-aided dispatch, Allow data management, allow units in field to access database, etc. Post-Completion _ PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): JUNE 199'2 Est Capital Est Annual , Est 1st Yr Oper/Maint Project ; 0 & M Opet•/Maim CAPITAL Expenditure % of COST Curr $ lnfl $ Curr $ Inf1 S COST Curr S iotfl $ Total - f $o $0 $0 $0 Personal Serv: G l 0 Services: Su plies: 0 0 0 P 0 0% I Mapintenance; 0 Land/ROW: 0 0% 0 0 0 1. Construction: Services; 0 0 10500 10575 100% 0 0 Equipment; 0 0% 0th 1: _ 0 0 oth 1: _ 0 0% 0th 2: _ 0 0 P... 0 0th 2. 0 - - $ 0 $0 - -500 %1,575 100% TOTAL (Thous): SO TOTAL (Thous!: $1, _ proof 0 a , IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): % YR TTL: 100% 500 c,. YR 1:- -1992 YR TOTAL; $1,575 500 }FEB; O iMAR: OCT: 0 NOV; 0 ,DEC: 0 !JAN: 75 JUL; 0 IAUG: O !SEP: 0 APR 1 0 (!SAY: 0 ;JUN: 5 i , 0% t . _ _ -O--TAL - $O % YR TTL: i 1 YR 21993 YR T 0 (DEC: 0 (JAN; 0 ;FED; 0 iMAR: 0 0 ISAP: 0 OCT: 0 !NOV; O ;JUL: 0 ,AUG. I 1PR; 0 (MAY: 0 (JUN: , _-SEP w : YR 3:-_'-1394 YR TOTAL; $0 % YR TTL 0 ,FEB: 0%(MARf 0 0 ;NOV; 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN; 0 OCT: 0 ,JUN; 0 'JUL; 0 (AUG; U , ` SEP. APR; 0 MAY; proof 0 V, FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): (SOURCE: XXXXXXXX; YEAR 1 ;;1uth UnautTt YEAR Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; Certificate ; Operating ; Aid In Const Grant TOTAL YR G0 Bond ;GO Bond GO Bond ;of obligation 1 Rovenue , 1,5 1 $0 $0 X992__-SO ( $0 $1,575 SO 0 i 0 0 ( 0 0 s 1993 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 ` IJ94 0 _ - 5 _ -i _ --'--------SO SO $0 - TTLS: - S0 i $ O -$1y575 ==oec = •_=c==es.eat===- proof 0 ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. MUTE; -ATTACH SITE HAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES 364D,_ k vI. q. , Lj(q~j1i , 1 09-Apr-91 DATE CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN i PROJECT DETAIL *Y1992 PROJECT q: 0050-02 ****************************+k**********************************************Oonth EYear OUTDOOR WARNING SYSTEM 1992 i PROJECT TITLE: S289 Thousand EST START DATE: J an 1gg2 t TTL f.ST CAPITAL COST: 6 Thousand June 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: TTL EST 1st PEAR 0&b! COST. **************************i************************#************************************ TTL EST :1VVU11. 0&M COST: „ warning. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION for emergent, stem 1 Provide outc,C, , siren s5 N tornado, etc, e,g ! II. PROJECTED PROJECT WENEVITS/pURPOSE e 4 Notify public in the event of an an emergency, i Post-Completion June 1992 - (I1. PROJECT BUDGET (DoLiars to Nearest. Thousandl: Est Annual Est Capital E-~st 1st Yr Oper/Maint w1 Project 0 & M oper/Maim Curr $ Infl S ' $ Evjienditure % of COST Curr Infl $ CAPITAL. Curt, $ Infl $ Total $Ol --$0 nSO 1 COST Pe i rsonal Se rv: 80- 0 0 $0 IS Q OX 0 0 p ' I 0 0% ~ MaiSuppl4es:ntenance: 1 1 0 0 , Services: 0 5 0 Land/ROW: 0 0% 6 0 0 ; services" 0 0 1 Construction: 276 289 100% 0th 1: - 0 0 4 0 i Equipment: 0 0 01 . 0 0th 1: 0 0% i 0th 2: _ _ $0 0th 2: $6 $6 100% TOTAL (Thoun): ~ TOTAL (Thousl: $215 proof -0 IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand?: YR TTT : _ YA ^TOTALt $289 0 FEB: ) MAR: 0 It ~ 1992 p ;DEC: 289 0 ,1JANJUL: : 0 AUG: 0 iSEP: 0 ' 1R 0 iNov: OCT, 0 MAY; 0 ,JUNt v 0% APR: , _ , __.------t-R TOTAL: 0 ;MAR: 4 $0 , 0 - -1993 0 ,FEBI 0 !SEP: YR 2: 0 1N~OV: 0 DEC: 0 iJULI 0 iAUG; , OCT: 0 iJUN: 0 i APR: 0 ,MAY: , 0% - % YR TTL: 0 0 MAR: YR TOTAL: $0 JAN' 0 'FRB: 0 ;SE 0 - -199 , YR 3: 0 ;Nov: 0 ,DEC 0 JULt 0 ,AUG. , OCTI 0 1JUN: U --proof APR', _ - _ ksoURCE: XXXXXXW YEAR V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousandl: , Aid in ' Auth & Unauth Certificate ; operating , TOTAL. ; Const Grant Said ,Unsold Unsold , of Obligation', Revenue yR GO Bond ;GO Bond GO Bond 0 = S40 $0 0 0 1932 0 0 i 0 0 _i 1993 0 0 1 0 i i_-- S2f31 1994 0 0--- - --__~•$0 ; SO SO 0,25 ~ 80 $289 i _,--a-aso~=am-os-so - $0 proof 1 TTLS: '-----_,~~ao.:c'- - OR CONSTRUCTION. LAND VOTE: ATTACH SITE HAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES 365 ' w j , gym Dui. _ t 1::6FU,~w. ~ 1 f, 7 ~5:ti;;PRi SS CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 09-Apr-91 DATE PROJECT DETAIL PROJECT TITLEt RELOCATE & COMBINE STA. 1 & STA, 3 PROJECT 0060-03 1993 TTL EST CAPITAI. COST: $2,150 Thousand Month Year TTL EST lst YEAR O&M COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: Jan 1993 i TTL EST ANNUAL 001 COST; 0 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: Oct 1993 I. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Combine and relocate fire stations One and Three to intersection of Eagle and Carroll Boulevard, 11, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: Improve response time and reduce station maintenance costs. Eliminate overlap of response districts, 111, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital Oct 1993 Project VEst 1st Yr Est Annual i CAPITAL Expenditure % of 0 & M Oper/Malnt Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Infi $ Total COST Curr $ Intl $ Curr $ Intl $ Services: $0 $0 0% Personal Serv: $0 $0 $0 $0 Land/ROW, 000 500 25% Supplies: 0 0 0 0 Construction: 1,500 1,650 75% Maintenance: 0 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 0 0% Services: 0 0 0 0 0th It 0 0 0% 0th 1: _ 0 0 0 0 Oth 2. _ 0 0 0% Oth 2: _ 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous): $2,000 $2,150 100% TOTAL (Thous): $0 $0 $0 ` f$D { proof 0 TV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR 1: 1993 1'R TOTAL: $2,160 % YR TTL: 100% OCT; 500 ;Nov: 0 ;DEC: 250 ;JAN. 0 :FED: 250 ;MAR: 0 APR: 250 :MAY: 0 ;JUN: 250 ;JUL; 250 ;AUGt 400 ;SEP: 0 YR 2: 1994 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% OCT: 0 :NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;,IAN: 0 MB: 0 ;MAR: 0 APR; 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 :JUL: 0 :AUG-. 0 ;SEP: 0 YR 1995 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR T L: OX OCT; 0 ;NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 :JAN: 0 :FEB: 0 ;MAR: 0 APR; O ;MAY; 0 ;JUN; 0 ;JUL; 0 ;AUG: 0 ;SEP: 0 proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Auth & Unauth ; !SOURCE: XXXXXXXX: Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; Certificate ; Operating Aid in YEAR 1'R GO Bond 100 Bond GO Bond ;of Obligation Revenue Const Grant ; TOTAL 1993 $0 SO $20150 ; $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,150 1994 0 0 0) 0) 0 i 0 0) 0 1995 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 TTLS $0 $0 51,150 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,150 p roof 0 NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION 366 fix..., 09-Apr-91 DATE CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN y PROJECT DETAIL 0050-04 1994 ***********************************************************************ORGN-N 19 PRESENT SITE PROJECT ON 4 - Month Year REBUILD STATl 1994 PROJECT TITLE: $863 Thousand EST START DATE: Jan Sept 1994 TTL EST GAPITAI, COST: 0 Thousand BST COMPL MTV" TTL F.5T 1st 1'I''AR 0&M COST: 0 Thousand isting site************* TTI, EST ANNUAL. O&M COST: *****************************************************ex i - ********A . BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: - Station 4 and build a new station on 1 Tear down existinS PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: too small for newer apparatus; } I[. PROJECTED UPRO3FC4 in poor structural condition; Existing C l utilizes all excellent station location site' Post-Completion I ~ ~ , 1991 st Annual PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Sept Est Est Capital Est 1st Yr Oper/Maint project 0 & M Oper/Maint Curr $ Intl project $ Infl $ Expenditure % of COST _ 'f CAPITAL $ Intl $ Total $O $0 Curr _ 0 0 0 COST Personal Serv: $0 0 SO so Supplies: 0 Services: 0 p OX l 0 0 p0 band/ROW: 750 863 100% ; Se Maintenance; Q 0 0 0 Construction: 0 0% 0 0 0 0% 0th 1: _ 0 0 0 Equipment: 0 OX 0th 2: y 0th 1: 0 0 $0 " 50 $0 0th 2: - 100% i TOTAL (Thousf: $0 _c= _ - TOTAL (Thous!: 5750 » proof - l IV, FUNDSNG REQUIREMENTS '(Dollars to Nearest Thousand(: _ T r _ _ 3B03 % YR TTL 260 iMAR: 0 YR TOTAL: JAN: 0 (FEB: 0 ;SEP 0 YR It 1994 p ;DEC: 0 ' 0 ;AUG: Ifff 0 ;NOV: JUL: I OCT: 0 ;JUN: 363 0% 1PR: - 250 ;MAY: I_._._-- $ = YR TTL' i 0 - MAR YR TOTAL: 0 ;JAN: O tFEB: p 0 , ;SEP• 0 YR- 2: 1995 0 `DEC: 0 ;AUG; 0 !NOV: 0 1JUL: OCT: 0 MAY: 0 JUN: APR: $ % n TTL: 0 ;MAR 0 ' - - YR TOTAL: 0 JAN: 0 ;PEB: 0 !SEP: 0 YR 3; 1996 0 ;DEC: 0 ' 0 ;AUU: OM 0 !NOV: 0 JUN: 0 JUL: APR s 0 }SAl': - - proof ( j _ - - (Dollars to Nearest Thcusandlt gOURCE: XXXXXXXX` YEAR V CUNDING SOURCES Lnauth Aid 10 Grant TOT 1L ,Auth & , Certificate Operatinr3 ' Const Sold iUnsold unsold , Revenue , i_ g8r3J 'of obligation! $0 ; $0 yg GO Bond ;GO Bond GO Bond $0 $863 $0 0 ( 0 0 0 ( -1994 SO 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 _ ' $Or; $fl63 k 1995 0 0 d $0 proof 0,5 .l 1996 $0 ' S , O = i`-_ = - w OR CONSTRUCTION. TTL5: NO'CE:ATTACH SITE MAP lF PROJECT SNCLUDBS- 67 , RO , l _ , y.{ r tl{kjji5 oi;,,Wo 1 I i CITY OF DE~ti'Rh4 CAPITAL. I\4PROV.jq[.,NT PL>uti 21--'Mar-91 DATE J evi r PROJSCC DETAIL tk#KiKK#*#t##t*##t#t#K##Kkt###KKKKK#K#K*KKK*k#KK#KKkKK##KK##*#Kk##tkK#KKt*#ORGN-10*1~:rUtK PROJECT 0: 0050•-0- 1991 PROJECT TIVY,: RhNOVATE STATION TWO Month Year $345 Thousand 1"1'I [S'I' Est Y1,_A,f? C\S~1 COST: 001 COST: 0 Thousand EST START DATE: 19911 1st Y1 ,AR CU?tPL D D )994 I't'1 I S'C ATE: Aug ##k#kKtkktkKktkktkkik#K*#kK#KKKKKtM'kkKKtkKK*K##*K***t*KKK*#*#KKK#K##K*#K*K###t##K###*#### E. L. ARILI iRUJI.('C DIiSC12il'CIOti; and i3emcxlel, , station; raise apparatus hav root' to acromalate Larger rcmovat,c± taller :xhlkli alas; < cxle aumpl kanc.e, etc - 71 1I. PEn)JICC'C[a PPUJGGT 171tifI~ITSF.: conservation, etc. Incrr;ase effectiveness; longevity of sCation; enerK} Pc),-,t -Completion ' I [ 1 , PIit1JCCC I3lifX7E'C (I)ol Tars to Nearest Thousand): r1u1996 Est Capital Est 15t Yr Est Annual 0 & ~I Oger/`faint. ~rlv,laint Pro. j eo t CAPITAL E%,Wndrture Y. of COST Curr S Infl S Curr $ Int'1 S COST Curr ~ Int'l a 'Total. ~ _ _ r _ _ 5U s0 $0 50 0 p Q ~0 0°/ ~ Personal 8erv. Ser~u:es: '(7 G Supplies: 0 0 Q p Connstrustru ;ct 0% iMaintenance: 0 Y, 0 U Q~ a , Services: U U 0 i , co um. 3UU 3d5 l0 O 0 U q Otui~nent: 0 0th 1: 0 0 0 ~ k.h p U% ~ 0th 2: p 0 - - Oth 2: 0 i - 3 _ $0 $0 s0 $300 ' - $345 100% ; TMAL (Thousl : : TOTAL, (Thous) _ proof Or [V. 1l;Np[:N'G I21:UUIROMWN {Dollars to Nearest Thousand): ----------tR TOTAL: s345 % YR TTL: 100 IhL1it: 0 j I tR l: 19:7 •I U ;DEC: 0 .JAN: I00 1h'F.A; 4 OrT1 1,15 U , ,,.UV 411':: 0 JUN: 0 JUL: p AUG: D 51P1 `0% SR TTL: 1995 YR TOTAL: 30 PR,A 0 i tU , 0 ,M: YR 2: 0 ;DEC: 0 „SAN: 0 (xT; U i`G\': ;JUN: ( } rul: 0 AUG: .0 ;SJ;P: 0 „ - Y YR T fLl t)% 1996 YR U( 01."C t 0; JAIN 0 FEIi: U 0 NV\ : 0 JLL,: 0 LAM: 0 ;5E1 I) root , V. I,4A\T)1N0 SO1, CES (Dollars to Nearest 'Chvusttnd) : SOLRCN : K\\S! N\\ 11.112 Auth & Unauth rating { Aid In sold ;Unsold l'rnsold , Certificate 1 Of)e T(7CAL j 1'R GO Bond ;GO Bond CF) ISolxt !of Obligation Revenue Cons Urant -t ----S0 -s345 s0-' SO 5~ 5U 0 0 U U ~ 17 1(996 O i 0 p , _i )9911 0 S a'. - - f 5 _i_ec~-=a-aec~ ==e Proof 7 i0 S345 l'1'1S; S( s- - •1't''.1CHiI SITE JL.1F' IF PROJECT iNCI,I;DIi5 L,1;tiU, ROW, OR CONS'172I,(;T10N, ' 368 xV e ~ i CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 09-Apr-91 DATE t PROJECT DETAIL ********************x*********************************PROJECT*0#t*** 0060-06 1995 PROJECT TITLE: FIRE TRAINING CENTER onth Year 52,400 Thousand MJan tear TTL EST CAPITAL COST: 72 Thousand EST START DATE: Sept 1995 TTL EST Ist YEAR O&M COST: 72 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: 3 TTL ESI ANNUAL 0&K COST: i, [BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: center; including drilltower, burn building, Construct new fire training classrooms, and offices- [i. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: Existing drilltower in poor state of repair with insufficient room for use and/or expansion; would provide for live burn training. Post-Completion III, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Sept 1995 t Eat Capital , Est 1st Yr Est Annual Project 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint CAPITA[, Expenditure % of COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr $ Infl $ COST Curr $ Intl $ Total ~ I _ Personal Serv: $0 $0 $0 $0 k, -____._~•$0 -----$p OX , 25 30 25 30 Servicest 13% ; Supplies: 10 Land/ROW: 250 300 10 12 12 ' ` Construction: 11650 1,1200 B 5% services: Maintenance: 25 300 255 300 Equipment: 100 12 0% i 0th 1. 0 -J 0th L' _ 0 0 0th 2: _ 0 0 0 0 f 0th 2: 0 0 0% TOTAL (Thous): $60 $72 _$60 -$72- TOTAL (Thous): _$2,000`r$2,400J 100% Proof 0 lY, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): _ i TOTAL: $2,400 400 - % YR TTL: 250 - .i YR 1: 1995 YR p ;JAN: 260 ;FEB: 250 ,MAR: 0 (NOV: 0 (DEC: 250 ISEP; 400 { OCT: 250 ;JUN: 250 IJUL: 250 IAUG: ~ APR; 250 ;MAY: - - - - % YR TTL: _ !MW 0 1996 YR TOTAL: $0 0 1VEB: 0 % I lR 2: 0 DEC: 0 iJAN: 0 ;AUQ: p SEP: o , I OCT: 0 MAY : 0 ;JUN: 0 JUL: APR: 0 JAY: ~ X YR TTL: U% 1 3.-- yg `TOTAL: WO 0 iMAR: @ 0 1997 0 OCT: D 0 IJAN: 0 (FEB: 0 ;sEP; 0 ,DEC: ,Nov: , j 0 :MAY: 0 IJUNt 0 ,JUL: 0 ;AUG: , APR: _.-~I. - - ' proof 0 V. FUNDING: SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): :SOURCE: XXXXXXXXI IAuth & Unauth & YEAR TOTAL Sold (Unsold Unsold I Certificate Operating I Aid in YR QO Bond IQO Bond QO Bond ;of Obligation I Revenue Const Grant $0 $0 I 52,400 SO , 1995 $0 I $0 $2,400 I 0) 0 0 0; 0 1946 0 I 0 0 O I 0 0 , O I 0. 1997 0 p s2,400 ITLSi £0 I 50 proof 0 NOTE: -ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. 369 t 1 p4 CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 09-Apr-91 DATE N1 PROJECT DETAIL i **###**#****************#***#####*##**#***##**#####*#####**#**#####***#**#***ORCN-NO *YEAR* PROJECT TITLE: PILOT KNOB FIRE STATION PROJECT 0050-07 1996 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: $1,250 Thousand Month Year TTL EST Ist YEAR 00I COST: 1,306 Thousand EST START DATE: Jan 1996 TTL EST ANNUAL 0&4 COST: 1,306 Thousand EST COMPI. DATE: Sept 1996 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION; Construct, staff, and equip new fire station in Pilot Knob area due to growth. it. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE; Growth and development requires station to maintain response times and key rate. 111, PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital Sept 1996 Project Est 1st Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of ; 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr S Iufl S Total ; COST Curt, $ Infl S Curr Intl i S e r v i c (S s $0 $0 0 - OX 1 Personal Serv: $1,000 $1,250 $1,000 $1,260 ; I Land/ROM': 0 0 0% Supplies: 10 13 10 13 Construction: 700 875 70% ! Maintenance; 10 13 10 13 Equipment; 300 375 30% ! Services; 25 31 25 31 ! 0th 1: 0 0 0% 0th 1: 0 0 0 0 0th 2: 0 U 0% 0th 2: _ 0 0 0 0 } TOTAL (Thous): $1,000 $1,250 100% ; TOTAL (Thous): $1,046 $1$06 $1,045 $1,206 j, proof- 0- h IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YH 1: _ -1996 YR TOTAL: $1,250 % YR TTL: 100% OCT: 0 ;Nov: 0 !DEC; 0 ;JAN: 100 :FEB: 100 ;MAR: 100 APR: 100 !MAY: 100 !JUN: 100 lJUL: 200 !AUG: 460 :SEP: 0 R 2' 1997 YR TOTAL: $U % YR TTL: OX OCT: 0 lNOv: 0 !DEC: 0 !JAN: 0 !FEB; 0 !MAR: 0 APR: 0 !MAY: 0 !JUN: 0 !JUL: 0 !AUG: O !SEP: 0 1 1R 3: 1998 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: O% OCT; 0 !,Nov: 0 !DEC' 0 !JAN: U !FEB: 0 :MAR: 0 APR: 0 !MAY; 0 JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 !AVG: 0 !SEP: 0 proof 0 V. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand); lAuth & Unauth ! !SOURCE: XXXXXXXX! Sold !Unsold Unsold! Certificate ; Operating ! Aid in ! YEAR YR 00 Bond !GO Bond GO Bond !of Obligation ! Revenue. ! Const Orant ! TOTAL 1996 -$0 ! $0 $1,250 ! $0 ! $0 ! $0 $0 ! $1,250 1997 0! 0 0 0! 0! 0 0! 0 ! 0! 0! 0 0! U 1998 0 ! 0 0 r' 1 TTi.S: $0 ! SO $1,250 ! $0 ! $0 ! $0 $0 ! S1,1 U - - - proof 0 ROTE: ATTACH SITE. MAP IF PROJFCT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION, 370 I 10 tr , b CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 09-Apr-91 DATE a PROJECT DETAIL *************#*******#****#**********#***************************************ORGN-NO *YEAR* PROJECT TITLE! MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FIRE STATION PROJECT 0050-08 Year TTL EST CAPITAL COST: S1,250 Thousand EST START DATE: JMonth an tear TTL EST ist YEAR 0&M !:OST: 1,325 Thousand TTL FIST ANNUAL 00i COS-r: 1,325 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: Sept 1996 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: f Construct, staff, and equip fire station at municipal airport. IT. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: Passenger service and Industrial development at airport requires on-site station, 1I1, i?ROJFCT BUDCE'C (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Sept 1996 Est Capital - Eat 1st Yr Est Annual _ Project 0 & M. Oper/Maint Oper/Maint CAPITAL Expenditure % of COST Curr 3 Intl S Total COST Curr $ lnfl $ Curr S/ Infl. $ _j Services; $0 SO 0% Personal Serv: $1,025 i,250 $1,026 $1,250 31 O 0 0% Supplies: 25 31 Land/ROW: 10 13 Constructiou: 700 875 70% Maintenance: 10 13 Oth 30% : Services: 25 311 20 31 I „I Equipment: 300 '17 0% ; 0th 1: 0 _ 0 1 J 0th 1: _ 0 0 0 II 0% 0th 2: 0 + 2 s TOTAL (Thous) $1, 1 250 100% TOTAL (Thous), $1,060 $1,325 $1,060 $1,325 proof--- --0 IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): ! + YR 1: 1996 YR TOTAL % YR TTL: 100% : $1,250 100 0 'DEC: 0 :JAN: 250 :FEB: 100 ;MAR: 0 ,NOV: OCT: APR: 100 !MAY: 100 :JUN: ---100 :JUL: 100 :AUG: 160 ;SEP: 250 1 1 , 5R 2. -1991 1'R TOTAL: $0 X % YR TTL: 0% FEB: 0 ;MAR: 0 OCT: 0 :NOV: 0 :DEC: 0 :JAN: A.PR: 0 :MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 IAUG: 0 SEP! 0 III _ ~ , _ ~ - - , - _ _ .-_.--_F 1'R 3: 1998 1'R TOTAL: -SO % YR TTL: OX 0 ;MAR: 0 OCT. 0 :Nov: 0 :DEC: 0 :JAN! 0 ;FEB: 0 ;SEP: 0 APR; 0 MAY 0 :JUN: 0 :JUL: 0 :AUG: i proof 0 V, FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): :Ruth & Unauth I SOURCE: XXXXXXXX: Sold ;Unsold Unsold : Certificate : Operating : Aid in : YEAR 1'R GO Bond :GO Bond GO Bond :of Obli,gaLion : Revenue : Const Grant ; TOTAL $ $250 _---$0 $0 I $0 $0 : 1996 $0 ~ $1,250 0 0 0 0 , G 1997 0 1, ' 1998 0: 0 0: 0: 0; 0 0: D + $0-0 1 $1,250 $0 : $0 $i troof TTi,S; $0 $O $1,250: p G ! NOTE; rATTACH SITE !W IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROR,-ORyCONSTRUCTION, 371 [ r ea) CITY OF DENTON CAP`.TAL IMPROVEMENT PLAY 09-Apr-91 DATE w , PROJECT DETAIL. ###***ORGN-NO *YEAR* PROJECT TITLE: LAKEVIEW FIRE STATION PROJECT k; 0050-09 1996 F~ TTL EST CAPITAL C(OV : $1,250 Thousand Month Year TTL EST 1st YEAR 0&}[ COST: 1,306 Thousand EST START DATE: Jan 1996 TTL EST ANNUAL O&M COST; 1,275 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: Sept 1996 I, DRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION; Construct, staff, and equip new fire station in Lakeview Development, II, PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: If growth occurs, station necessary for response time and Insurance rates, t1[. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital Sept 1996 Project ; Est 1st Yr Est Annual CAPITAL. Expenditure % of ; 0 & M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ Tnfl 5 Total ; COST Curr $ Infl $ Curr S/ Infl $ services: $0 $0 0% ; Personal Serv: $1,000 $1,250 $1,000 $1,260 f., I Land/ROW: 0 0 0% ; Supplies: 10 13 10 13 Construction: 700 875 70% ; Maintenance; 10 13 10 13 Equipment: 300 375 30% Servicea: 26 31 0 0 i 0th 1: _ 0 0 0% ; 0th 1: _ 0 0 0 0 4th 2: 0 0 0% : Oth 2: 0 0 0 0 - _ # TOTAL (Thous): 51,000 51,250 100% TOTAL (Thous): $1,046 $1,306- v$1,020 ^ $1,275 i--. proof f IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): 1'R 1 1996 YR TOTAL: $1,250 % YR TTL: 100% 4} OCT; 0 :NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 250 !FEB: 260 ;MAR; 250 ui APR; 250 ;MAY: 100 ;JUN: 100 ;JUL: 50 ;AVG, 0 :SEP: 0 ; YR 2 1997 YR TOTAL; $0 % YR TTL; 0% OCT: 0 ;NOV; 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN; 0 ;FEB: 0 ;MAR; 0 APR; 0 :MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 ;JUG: 0 ;AUG; 0 !SEP: 0 YR 3: 1998 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% OCT: 0 ;NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 ;FEB: 0 ;MAR: 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 ;JUL: 0 WO: O :SEP: 0 proof 0 V, FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): ;Muth & Unauth &; : :SOURCE; XXXXXXXX: ' Sold ;Unsold Unsold ; Certificate ; Operating Aid in ; YEAR YR GO Road ;GO Bond 00 Bond ;of Obligation ; Revenue Const Grant ; TOTAL 1996 $0 $O $U ; 51,250 0 250 $0 $0 1997 0: 0 0: 0; 0; 0 0: 0 1999 0: 0 0 0; 0: 0 0 0 TTLS: SO $0 $1,250: $0 $0 ; $0 $0 ; 51,250 proof 0 SOTS: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION, 372 - Y„ r..;,<.v CITY OF DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 09-Apr-91 DATE ' PROJECT DETAIL **********************#***###*#****#****#*****#*#****###***********#*****#*ORGN-NO *YEAR* PROJECT TITLE: SOUTIIVIEW FIRE STATION PROJECT 0050-10 1996 TTL EST CAPITAL, COST: $1,250 Thousand Month Year TTL EST Ist YEAR C&A COST: 1,306 Thousand EST START DATE: Jan 1996 TTL. EST ANNUAL 0&M COST: 1,306 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: Sept 1996 1. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Cnu:iCruct, stsff, rind equip fire station in 5outhview Development, It. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: If vrowth and development occur in Southview, fire station Is needed t, maintain response times and insurance rates, Ill. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital Sept 1996 Project ; Est ist Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of ; 0 & M Oper/faint Oper/Maint COST Curr $ (11f1 S Total ; COST Curr $ Intl $ Curr Intl $ Services:^ - 50 $O 0% ; Personal Serv: $1,000 $1,250 $1,000 $1,250 Land/ROW: 0 0 0% Supplies: 10 13 10 13 Construction: 700 875 70% Maintenance: 10 13 .10 13 Equipment: 300 375 30% Services: 25 31 25 31 0th 1: 0 0 0% 0th 1: 0 0 0 0 0th 2: 0 0 0% 0th 2: _ 0 0 0 0 } TOTAL (Thous): $1,000 51,250 100% TOTAL (Thous): $1,045 $1,306 $1,045 $1,306 -=proof 0 IV, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): 4 YR 1: J 1996 _YR_-TOTAL: $1,250 % YR TTL: 100% J OCT; 0 ;SOV: 4 )DEC: 0 )JAN: 250 iFEB: 100 iMAR: 100 :APR: 100 :MAY: 100 ;JUN: 250 ;JUL: 100 !AUG: 260 WP: 0 1'R 2: 1997 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0% OCT: 0 :N06: 0 !DEC: 0 )JAN: 0 :FES: 0 !MAR; 0 APR: 0 )MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 lJUL: 0 :AUG: 0 Mp t 0 '(R -3: 1998 YR TOTAL: 80 % YR TTL: 0% OCT: 0 ;NOV: 0 )DEC: 0 )JAN: 0 MB: 0 ;MAR: 0 APR: 0 !`LAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 !JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 ;SEP: 0 proof 0 G. FUNDING SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): ;Ruth & Unauth ! !SOURCE: XXXXXXXX! Sold ;Unsold Unsold ! Certificate ; Operating Aid in ! YEAR YR GO Bond :GO Bond GO Bond ;of Obligation : Revenue : Const Grant TOTAL I 199G 3U SD 51,250 ; $0 ; $1,250 I 1997 0! 0 0: 0! 0, 0 0; 0 1998 0! 0 0: 0: 0: 0 0; 0 i ' TTLS: $0 $0 $1,250$o so 40 $11250 proof 0 `TOTE; ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, OR CONSTRUCTION, 1373 r _ 4yYr,"A`At TAt 'I all ! IT i. `I