The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07-16-1991 I MIAMI 7 4 AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL July 16, 1991 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, July 16, 1991, at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of City f Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: 1 \ Note: Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work session may E also be considered as part of the Agenda for the, Regular Meeting. 4 i 5:15 p.m. 1. 8xecutive Session: A. Legal. Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252--17 I V.A.T.S. ; 1. Consider action regarding claim of Michael Wilson. f B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 1 V.A.T.S. f C. Personnel/Board Appointments - Under Sec. 2(g), , { Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. i 3. Consider appointments to all City of Denton B6ards, Commissions and Task Forces. { 2. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding a review of the Denton Central Appraisal District's ;t budget. I a 3. Receive comments and give future directions regarding the Major Budget Issues Report. t- Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, July 16, 1991, at 7:00 p.m. in the council Chambers of City Hall, 215 K. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: 7:00 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Consider approval of the minutes of the Special Call sleeting of June 25, 1991 and the Regular Meeting of July 2, 1991. s. ,r, 1 li l City of Denton City Council Agenda July 16, 1991 I Page 2 3 Receive a report from Dianne Edmondson representing 3. the State Relations Committee - Denton Chamber of Commerce. Presentation of Yard of the Month Awards. • 4. 5. Public Hearings \ • r A, Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance amending a Detailed Plan on a portion I L of Planned Development No. 8 for the purpose of reconfiguring the building footprint and reducing the overall gross square footage of the buildings F on property located on the northeast corner of N, Elm (Highway 77) and Pallmeadow. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-0 at its June 12, 1991 meeting.). Z..91-006 r ~ B. Ho3d a public hearing and consider approval of a resolution amending the Denton Development Plan E Concept Map by extending the northwest urban center south along Interstate 35N (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-0 at i- its June 12, 1991 meeting). 111 ¢ i C. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of, an ordinance for the rezoning of a 245.8 acre tract from the Agricultural district to the Planned Development district and approving a Development Plan for a mixed use development consisting of office, retail, commercial, manufacturing, and institutional uses on property located: in the northeast and southeast quadrants of 135N and Loop 286 (under construction). (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-0 at its ; June 12, 1991 meeting.) Z-91-004 D. Hold a public hearing to consider approval of the preliminary and final replats of the Cooper Landing Subdivision; from Lots 6A and 68; Block 1; into Lot 6R. The .196 acre site is on the northwest corner of Windsor Drive and Cedar. Hill I Road. (The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval 5-0 at its June 26, 1991 meeting.) t f ~tA. d i ~M1 City of Denton City Council Agenda July 16, 1991 Page 3 E. Hold a public: hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance approving an amendment to the concept plan for Planned Development No. 72; platted as Cooper Landing, changing the use, from duplex to ( single family. The .196 acre tract is on the northwest corner of Windsor Drive and Cedar Hill Rd. Z-91-009 (The Planning and zoning i commission recommended approval 5--0 at its June 26, 1991 meeting.) F. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance approving an amendment to Planned ( Development No. 5 to allow additional parking and I a storage building on 2.117 acres, owned by , DeBerry Funeral Directors. The site is on the south side of University Drive, 294.5 feet west of Ector Street. Z-91-008 (The Planning and 3f Zoning Commission recommended approval, 5-0 at ~ its June 26, 1991 meeting. I i 6. Consent Agenda 3 Each of these items is recommended by the staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations, Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda, Detailed back-'up information is attached to the j ordinances (Agenda items 7.A. 7.8. 7,C). This listing is Council Members to Jj discuss provided any on the item prior e to approval t of the allow ordinance. i A. Bids and Purchase Orders: Bid #1211 Water Consulting SVC & Chemical f Supply 2, Bid 01261 - Pre Crusher and Container 3. P,O. 013910 - ESRI } E U. Tax Refunds 1. Consider approval of a tax refund to United Title Co. - $691.92 4 i t ~ fl,KIFRY@~ ? City of Denton City Council Agenda July 16, 1991 Page 4 7. Ordinances i A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase Of materials, equipment, supplies or services. (6.11.2. Bid + 4#1261) 8. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. 6.A.1. - did 4#1211 1 F C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for purchases of i materials or equipment which are available from only one coerce in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bide. (6.A.3. - P.O. 013910) 1 D. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an ~ amendment to an agreement between the City of Denton and Services Program for Aging Needs. I ' H. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an amendment to an agreement between the City of Denton and Denton County Friends of the Family. F. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending Section 18-109 of Chapter 18 of the Code of Ordinances to provide for designation of parking spaces for exclusive use of disabled persons on public property; designating said parking spaces on Austin Street and Walnut Street; and providing for a penalty of a fine of not less titan fifty ; dollars, nor more than two hundred dollars. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Vpport commission recommends approval.) , 0. Consider adoption of an ordinance repealing F Sections 18-51, 18-52, 18-53, 18--64, }.8-55, and 18-56 of Chapter 18 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton relating to regulation of trucks and truck routes; rtmending Division 2 (Trucks and Truck Routes) of Chapter 18 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton; establishing definitions; establishing designated truck ro•ates and regulating for departure therefrom; providing for exceptions; prohibiting r y fi ~ ~ arer~:v J 1 i City of Denton City Council Agenda July 16, 1991 Page 5 certain use of residential streets; establishing requirements for the operation of concrete trucks; establishing a maximum vehicle load limit; providing for a maximum penalty of two hundred dollar3 for violation thereof; and providing for a severability clause. (The j Citizens Traffic safety support commission recommends approval.) H. Consider adoption of an ordinance designating and establishing a school safety speed zone on State E Highway PH 426 (McKinney Street) for both directions of travel between Station 160 + 40 and Station 170 + 40 measuring a total distance of one thousand (1,000) feet in length and being centered a distance of five hundred (500) feet on each side of the main entrance to Billy Ryan High School; reducing the maximum prima facie speed limit for such portion of .aid street from I fifty-five (55) miles to thirry-five(35) miles per hour during certain hours; providing a penalty of a fine not to exceed two hundred dollars (#200); and providing a severability clause. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends approval.) 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an agreement between the City of Denton and the State of Texas for installing traffic signal ! controllers within the City of Denton. 8. Resolutions A. Consider approval of a resolution temporarily closing the 100 block of North Elm Street,' 100 block of West Oak Street. 100 block of North Locust Street and 100 block of West Hickory Street on September 28, 1991. ti B. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing a ; traffic light synchronization program grant application to promote the conservation of energy resources C, Consider approval of a resolution approving f development plans for property leased to Fox 51 Ltd, at the Denton Municipal Airport, (The I Airport Advisory Board recommends approval,) D. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing Amendment No, 2 to the Airport Commercial Operator Lease Agreement between the City of Denton and fox 51 Ltd. (The Airport Advisory Board recommends approval.) ME ME I { WW r i City of Denton City Council Agenda i July 16, 1991 Page 6 f E, Consider approval of a resolution nominating a member to the Board of Managers of the Denco Area 9-1-1 District. 9. Miscellaneous matters from the city Manager' A. Appointment to the Civil Service Commission j 14 10, Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Hatters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 11, New Business This item provides a section for Council Members to t suggest items for future agendas. 12, Executive Sessions R ! A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art, 6252-17 V.A.T.S. ; B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f). Art. 6252.17 V. PL. T. S. ; i C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Seca 2(q), 3 Art 6252-17 V,A.T.S. F II i NOTE: THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT I IS LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE. C E R T I V I C A T E ! ! 1 certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the i bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1991 at o'clock y~ (a.m.) 1 CITY SEt"RLTARY 3411C r y r t r MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 E CITY of P7ENTON, TEXAS M E M 0 R A N D U M TOs Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager, f J~ , I PROMS Harlan L. Jefferson, Treasurer I DATES July 11, 1991 f SUBJECT: DENTON CENTRAL. APPRAISAL DISTRICT'S PROPOSED 1992 BUDGES Last year the City council disapproved the As you are aware, District's (DCAD) budget because it , Denton Central Appraisal previous year 's budget. S. significantly increased over the the DCAD is again proposing an increase in th 5 fferent. UnfortunatelYt the budgets however, the reasons are adjustments. A This ear year ago, the increases were due to salary assed by the State increased are Legislature. Attathcehed result is a co°pfy ofathair proposed 1992 budget, and the cover. latter to the Board of Directors explains he specific impact of the lave. P{ Of the DCAD'9 budget is scheduled for h Since the Public Hearing o we would like to btain that prior July 180 1991 (See attachment II), i follow t feedback k fro m t0options aretasi e date. The City Council's rint3 Che [ o Have staff present their concerns, if anYs du ~ public hearing, o Take no formal action to approve or disapprovp of the DCAD's final budget. o Take formal action to diapprove of the DCAD's budget. ; questions please do not hesitate to contact moo y if you have an I t t 5898P HJS1m , Attachment ,k 817/566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 t t l X, I yP,i yy y l i ATTACHMENT i DENTGN CHNTRAL APPRAISAL. DISTRICT n11 MOFGN STABET _ P.O. BOX tau ; pENTON, TEXAS 76202.2{1 a 6{7.866 BOARD OF MRE010RSI JOE D. ROGERS, OYAMPAIRTA JON 19M Ch*~ Chief ApswWW CLARENCE MV911s, VIoaCh*nle" JOHN O. BROWN, RPA RICHARD n ~ mll Chi Apptitw NORA°E BOOM doEoAipWty Chief AppWW-Adv0n1**z*,, t M B M C Tp, All Taxing Jurisdictions irrm Joe Rogers, Chief Appraiser ' DAT1If i Jude 1, 1991 l SpBJBCT~ Proposed 1992 Budget S nclosed is DCAD's Proposed 1992 Budget A Public Hearing will be lII i held se the Budget at 4100 P.M. on July 18, 1991, at 3911 Morse, L Benton, Texas. X would like to call your attention to the letter to the sal the front of Board of Directors oretincreasing dwetoetheracttiionsiofs unt that appraisal dist cont the the state a rislatssethat appraisaludistrictsido notnhave any method 1 Legislature ealix of absorbing additional expenses and have to paasstheur ivt3onso g to _ the t"ing Jurisdictions. obviously, have to increase taxes to pay toTh!°DDCCADDistaff reao0isesetheill receive little it dny benefit 1 problemo but, there is little that we can do. Joe ogers a i t I i I ` 1 7 Gl'rr+YbW. 1pl a n. t 1 1 i DONTON CSNTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT 1992 BUDGST E ; 3 1 ' . ICE i i t 1 l 92canten.wpt DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT 1992 BUDGET TABLE OF CONTENTS M page 1 - TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2 - BUDGET LETTER Page 4 - SUMMARY of 1992 3STIMAT2D REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AND COMPARISON TO THg 1991 SUDGS'r 3 page 5 - 1992 APPRAISAL OPSRATIONS EXPENDITURES BUDGET AND COMPARISON TO THE 1991 %XP%NDITUR98 BUDGET F Page 6 -NXP74ANATION OF EXPENDITURES! INCREASES & DECREASES i paps 27 - 1992 ALLOCATIONS WORK SHEET Pago 29 - 1992 SALARY SCHEDULE j i i i V BLS T',:dC{fQ. i DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT 3911 MORSE STREET P.O, BOX 261! 4DIE NTON, TEXAS 76202.2816 M 817 586090 BOARD OF DIRECTORSt' JCE D. ROGERS, CTAIRPMRTA JON BECK, Ch*~ Chiol ApprWw CLARET 9 MYERS. V1064hskmw JOHN BROWN, PA RKSURD SMITH, Soorotry ChW ow TROY WHffE JOE A. FORSYtHE ~HCRAO BRE OCK DeputY CMeI App W { June 15, 1991 Chairman of The Hoard Directors of the Board Of Denton sCentral Appraisal District (dent lemen e The Denton Central Appraisal District's Proposed 1992 Budget for i the fiscal year ending December 310 1992 is hereby submitted to the Board. In accordance with Sec 6,06 of the State Property Tax Code, the budget in also being submitted to the 47 Jurisdictions that financially support the operations of DCAD. The member iuriediotions served are located in Denton, Dallas, Wise, Tarrant, Cooke, and Grayson Countiesr tt The Texas Property Tax Code requires that the Chief Appraiser ensure that the appraised value of property for tax purposes be 1006 of market. The Proposed 1992 Budget was prepared considering that mandate. The Proposed 1992 Budget reflects a substantial increase due to the State Legislature's actions, The Legislature's actions are consuming I all appraisal districts' resources in a number of areas., One login i sated requirement is the development and implementation of a records management system that will comply with the Records Management Act, ( Due to the large number of new records received and maintained each year, compliance with the Act will require additional staff which necessitates additional revenues to pay for the added expense. The creation and implementation of an Appointment of Proper uttlixaForn of this another mandate that generates expense, distr'iato form mandates that assignment of place n~umbera will of t p p ens of agents to represent the owner on one account, or the assignor I one or more agents on all property of the owner. Properly administering this form will be extremely difficult and will strain our resources, Other legislation that in causing the District concerns is the continual opportunities made available to property f wners to reduce their property value after their normal allotted protest time tias expired. This additional right afforded property 111 owners is increasing the expenses of the District. These additional expenses have to be passed aiung to the supporting Jurisdictions in the form of increased budget allocations. F litt to do With TtSe additional le~iglreidstbstantialhattentioneby Appraisal appraising) prop® Y+ This means lass avallTh0 only ewayQDCAD canes can District employees. a rop receive ertyr be devoted to the appraisal e r 1992 continue to properly appraise property is to The the funds proposed } necessary to pay for additional responsibilities. this incresse Budget is inore*sing 8.6 eg of (records management andiapp~0lntmsnttof to the legislated man agents. It is.a vary ®°e ltooaCaomniodataAmatters that have little to increasing to this deg do with appraising property, licwever, we have to follow the ad expenses Legislature's mandateSlowirnigthis directlYathroughhthedbud9®processato by d Legiongurs are the taxing jurisdiction* and on to the taxpayers. The Prop osed 1992 Budget and 61100ations of the Budget to the taxing ivrisdoctiona reflect only appraisal related activity, The revenues and expenses neseinithadpropo®ed 1992tBudget.collection activity is not included inter Y, Toe Ro era Chief Appraiser G 1 t i 1 . [Y.v':fia226 j)'1 N t PUDGET/92REVENI-SSF f I ' I ~ .y DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT Page 4 SUMMARY OF 1992 ESTIHATED~ REV+MUES AND EXPENDITURES r , AND COMPARISON TO THE 1991 BUDGET 1991 1992 CLASSIFICATION BUDGET 3l1D0ET i _ww.• ~ w r ~ REVENUFiS l FUNDING FROM JURISDICTIONS S2,028,b75;03 $2,205,845.36 INTEREST ON INVFa31'lDIM 20,000.00 $20,200.00 i ` - r---- TOTAL $2,048,675-03 $2,225,846.36 j REVENUES , rrrrrrrrrrrrr rrr~.wr.Pr~re1 _ i i l EVENDITUltL"S, - TOTAL BUDGETED EXPENDITURES $2,048,675.03 $2,225,845.36 r.rrrrrrrrrrr rr.arrrrrrrrr • i i{ 1'::it?13L a R DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT Page 5 1992 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS EXPENDITURES BUDGF,'T } j AND COMPARISON TO THE 1991 EXPENDITURES BUDGET 1991 BUDGET 1992 BUDGET ACCT CLASSIFICATION w--- 5117 SALARIES. . . . . . . • $1,0370044.27 $10134,105.38 . 700990.90. 7$0174.73 5119 SOCIAL SZCUR'1TY (FICA). . . . . . 94,324.95 115,602.76 5120 OROUP HEALTH INSURANCE. . . . . . 54,628.78 590250.15 5121 RETIREMENT (TCDRS). • . . . . 9,484.00 91720.00 5123 LONGEVITY PAY 102 453.60 113,940.00 1 5124 AUTO M(PENSE REIMBURSFNE'NT. 17,631,96 170925.06 ; 5125 WORKERS' COMP INSURANCE . . 14,992,00 151134.00 5126GcNERAL INSURANCE . . . . . 4t275.00 40276.00 5127 AUDIT . . . . . . . . 95000,00 801000.00 5128 LEGAL SERVICES. S 5129 OIL, GASO•HEAVY INDUSTRIALf 22,650.00 23,850.00 AND UTILITY VALUATION . , . 24,630.54, 280756.89 5130 DEEDS, SALES, AND VALUE INFORHATION . . . . • • 330268.20 33,887.16 ; 5132 PRINTING SERVICE 440680.00 43,295.00 5133 OFFICE SUPPLIES . . . • • 35405,00 34,849.12 5134 FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT 7,400.00 9,20000 ~ E CE 870396.00 93,356..00 5135 OFFICE ZQUIPHM $136 DATA PROCESSING 11AINTFIN aN9 & DUES. 50623.45 8,032.83 5137 REGISTRATION, SUBSCRIPTI 23,400.00 27,700.00 5138 SC MUR , CONFERENCES, AND TRAVEL. 60,938.00 62,098.00 1 5139 POSTAGE & FREIGHT . . . . t 1 3,000,00 3,000.00 , $142 LEGAL W.nCES & ADVERTISING 23,212.00 23,212.00 j 5143 EtXC RIC:,:TY, WATER & SEWER 27,718.38 32,528.28 { 5145 TELEPHONS . . . . . . . . . . . , 1 5146 BUILDING MAINTENANCE, JANITORIAL SERVICES & 27,010.00 28,765,00 f ' GROUND MAINTDNANCE. 21 960.00 22,680.00 5149 APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD. . • • • • 40,000.00 30,000.00 r 5152 CONTT.NOENCY , . . . . . , , . . . . 59,x.00 590 8.00 9153 BUILDING & LAND PAYMENT . , $,000.00 251290.00 J 5154 BUILDING & LAND IMPROVEMENTS. . 61780.00 7,430.00 5155 MISCELLANEOUS . . . . . . 700.00 700.00 5156 OTHER A38E'1'S. - } $2,048,675,03 $20225,845.36 uwrrrrrrwnrrr wwrrrsrrrrw~r 'i 1 TOTAL f I I j I j { i I j ti 4 92budgt2 1992 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 6 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECMASED) I f 5117 SALARIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1992 BUDGET r $1,134,105.38 $97,061.11 1991 BUDGET r $1,037,044.27 THERE ARE 47 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES BUDGETED FOR 1992, AN INCR:ASE OF TWO EMPLOYEES. THE SALARIES INCREASE Is DUE TO THE ADDING OF A FULL-TIME POSITION IN CHARGE OF RECORDS HANAGEmeNP AND FULL-TIME POSITION IN CHARGE OF SUPPLMMNTAL VALUE NOTICES AND APPOINT m OF AGENT FORMS, AND SOME MINOR SALARY ADJUSTMENTS. ALL OTHER SALARIES ARE BEING INCREASED BY 33. THE TWO NEW POSITIONS ARE CAUSED BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE'S ACTIONS. THE TWO NEW POSITIONS ACCOUNT FOR 39.8% OF THE INCREASE IN THE SALARIES ACCOUNT AND IN OTHER SALARIES RELATED ACCOUNTS. EMPLOYEES' SALARIES. $1,134,105.38 i MAL SALARIES - ACCT N 5117 . . . . . . . . $1,134,105.38 vrrorr.....r 5119 SOCIAL SECURITY (FICA) . . . . . . . . . . . 1992 BUDGET $78,174.73 $7,193.83 $70,980.90 ; 1991 BUDGET r THE INCREASE IS DUE TO ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL, SALARY INCREASES, AND THE INCREASE IN LONGEVITY. THE FICA ; BUDGET AMOUNT IS COMPRISED OF TlM FOLLOWING I (1) FICA ON SALARIESi SAld1RIES X FICA RATE » FICA AMOUNT $1,134,105.38 0.0765 $86,759.06 (2) FICA ON LONGEVITYi LONGEVITY % FICA RATE FICA AMOUNT $90120.00 0.0765 $743.58 (3) L888i FICA ON SALARIES OF FOUR EMPLOYEES NOT PARTICIPATING IN SOCIAL SECUPMe --M ARIES X MCA RATE FICA MOUNT - 1 $121,933.51 0.0765 $9,327`91 - TOTAL FICA - ACCT # 5119. $78,174.73 , rrwrrrrrrr ~ . I i 1 , t f 92budgt2 1992 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 7 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES j INCREASED ACCOUNT IOR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) ---r 5120 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 1992 BUDGET - 8115r602.76 $21,277.81 1991 BUDGET - y $94,324.95 1 THE GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE BUDGET IS FOR EMPLOYEES ONLY, THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT DOES NOT PAY FOR DEPENDENTS' INSURANCE. THE LW(RENT ANNUAL BLLLIIW TOTAL $98,562.69. WE HAVE SEED ADVISED THAT THERE WILL PROBABLY BE A 164+ INCREASE DURING 4HE LAST QUARTER OF 1991. BASED ON THE EXPECTED AVERAGE ANNUAL COST PER EMPLOYEE, THE GROUP HEALTH HEALTH INSURANCE BUDGET ITEM IS CALCULATED AS FOLLOWSi ESTIMATED NUMBER OF ANNUAL COST i. EMPLOYEES X PER EMPLOYEE - TOTAL j 47 -$2,540,72 $119,413,84 F I LESS AMOUNT CHARGEABLE TO TAX COLLECTIONS $30811.08 TOTAL HEALTH INSURANCE - ACCT 9 5120 $115,602.76 1 5121 RETIREMENT (TCDRS) . . . . . . . . . . . 1992 BUDGET - $591250.15 $4,621.38 J ! 1991 BUDGET w $54,628.78 I THE RETIREMENT EXPENSE XS 5.184 Of GROSS PAY FOR ALL FULL-TIMV PERSONNEL. THE BUDGET CALCULATIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS (1) TCDRS ON SALRRIESs i TCDRS TCDRS SALARY X RATE - AMOUNT r--._r $1,134,105.38 0.0518 $58,746.66 (2) TCDRS ON LONGEVITYi TMRS TCORS LONGEVITY X RATE w AMOUNT __rrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrr $9,720,00 0.0518 $503.50 rrr Yrrrrr.. TOTAL RETIREMENT - ACCT 4 5121 . . . . . . . $59,250.15 4 ' 1 i r}9 S. fC.6 f]H' t 4 Page 8 92budgt2 1992 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET r j EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURESO INCREASER AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OF TOTAL (DECREASED) ACCT CLASSIFICATION 1992 BUDGET r $9,720.00 $236.00 i 5123 LONGEVITY PAY. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1991 BUDGET r $90484.00 EACH EMPLOYEE'S LONGEVITY PAY IS $4 PER MONTH FOR ' EACH YEAR OF SERVICE. THE BUDGET INCREASE IS DUE TO THE ACCRUAL OF THLS BENEFIT TO EMPLOYEES HIRED BEFORE THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINS. AN EMPLOYEE HIRED DURING THE FISCAL YEAR WILL NOT BE SLIGIBLE FOR { THIS BENEFIT DURING THE FISCAL YEAR. 'DOTAL LONGEVITY PAY TO ALL EMPLOYEES . . . . $9,816.00 LESS LONGEVITY PAY CHARGEABLE TO COLLECTIONS $96.00 TOTAL LONGEVITY PAY - ACCT 9 5123. . . . $9,720.00 _ rrrrrrrrrr 5124 AUTO EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT . . 1992 BUDGET r $1130940.00 $11,486.40, r 1991 BUDGET r $102,453.50 f THE BUDGET INCREASE IS CAUSED BY THE ADDITION OF ONE EMPLOYEE TO ITCH (1) BELOW AND THE ADDITION OF ITEM (3) ; BELLOW. EMPLOYEES THAT DO NOT RECEIVE A MONTHLY AUTO ` EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT WILL RECEIVE $.275 PER MILE. (1) EMPLOYEES THAT RECEIVE A STANDARD MONTHLY AMOUNT OF $350 FOR AUTO EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT NUMBER OF RATE PER NUMBER OF TOTAL EMPLOYEES X MONTH X MONTH9 r t ^-25"- $350.00 25 $105,000.00 1 (2) AUTO REIMBURSEEENT TO EMPLOYEES THAT DO NOT RECEIVE A STANDARD MONTHLY AUTO REIMBURSEMENT. THE PAYMENT IS FOR MAKING MAIL RUNS, PICLSW UP OFFICE SUPPLIES, AND OTHER MISC. TRIPS. MILLS RATE PER NUMBER OF DRIVEN X MILE X MONTHS r TOTAL 800 $0.275 12 $20640.00 j t t 5124 AUTO EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT (Continued on next page) 1iYkijl Sklntffh'} 1 c 1992 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 9 , 92budgta 1 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR TOTAL (DECREASED) ACCT CLASSMCATION s 5124 AUTO EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENR (Continued from previous Page) (3) EMPLOYEES THAT RECEIVE A STANDARD NON3'HLY AMOUNT 1 OF $175 roll AUTO EXPENSE, ' NUMBER OF RATE PER NUMER OF EMPLOYEES X MONTH X MONTHS r TOTAL - 12---- --$6,300.00 i ' 9 . TOTAL AUTO REI!ffitIRSEME'NT - ACCT 5124 $113,940.00 rsrrrrrrrns f 1992 BUDGET r $17,925.0b $293.10 5125 4i0RIQ;ARS' COMP INSURANCE. . . . a 1991 BUDGET w $17,631.96 ~ THE INCREASE IS DUE TO THE INCREASE IN THE SALARIES } BUDGET. THE RATES AAA STATE CONTROLLED. THIS BUDGET rM IS CALCULATED AS Wilms ) (1) APpRAISBAS 9 $2.61 PER $100 SALARY, ` SALARY X RATE r TOTAL $5410461.17 --2.6100% 814,132.14 (2) OFFICE CLERICAL 9 $.64 PER $100 SALARY, { TOTAL SALARY % RATE - 0.6400% $592,644.21 $3,792.92 TOTAL WiORK$RS' COMP - ACCT # 5125. . $i"1,925.06 ' rr.r.rrrrr 5126 GENERAL INSURANCE. . . . . . 1992 BUDGET w $150134.00 9)42.00 1991 BUDGET r $14,992.00 THE GOMM INSURANCE BUDGET ITEM 18 COMPRISED OF THE FOLLOWMi i ~ff (1.) BUIL zma, CONTENT5, ETC. $4,500.0@ (2) BOND ;C1tSURANCA S 1 r 516 00 (3) COlPtM W?UnII W $2,b06.00 (3) PUBLIC O!"!'ICAL LYIIBIL.ITY 200.00 (4) VALUABLE PAPERS. . . . $156010.00 (5) EMPLOYEES DISHONESTY BONDS 8213.00 (6) NOTARY REGISTRATION. TOTAL GANERAL INSURANCE ` ACCT M 5126. . . . $15,134.00 rr...rrrrrrr 4 t S Page 10 92bttdgt2 1992 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED OR ( TOTAL (DECREASED) i I ACCT CLASSIFICATION - ACCOUNT j 5127 AUDIT. .1992 BUDGET r $4,279.00 $0.00. f 1991 BUDGET r $4,275.00 THIS BDLYJET ITEM AMOUNT WILL REMAIN UNCHANGED. J TOTAL AUDIT - ACCT 4 5127. . . . . . . . . . $4,275,00 I 1992 BUDGET r $80,000.00 ($50000.00) 5128 LEGAL SERVICES i . p 1991 BUDGET r $85,000600 THIS BUDGET ITEM WAS REDUCED IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE BUDGET REDUCTION. TOTAL LEGAL SERVICES - ACCT 4 5128 . . . . . $800000.00 5129 OIL, GASH AND UTILITY VALUATION . . . . . . . . 1992 BUDGET r $23,860.00 $1200.00 4 , !F! 1991 BUDGET r $22065@.00 f THE BUDGET AMOUNT FOR THIS LINE rM IS BEIM INCREASED FOR 1992. THIS ITEM IS CONTRACTED FOR A TWO (2) YEAR j PERIOD AND WILL BE REBID DURING 1991 FOR 1992 AND 19930 TOTAL VALUATION] SERVICES ACCT # 5129 . . . $23,850.00 rrrrrwrrr - 5130 DEED, SALES, AND VALUE IN70RHATION. 1992 BUDGET $28,756.89 $4,126.35 1991 BUDGET _ $24,630.54 t_ (1) BUSINB88 RECORDS MICROFILM 513,800.00 DEED INTO ($1,150/H0. . (2) MOBILE HOME N.A.D.A $75.00 (3) DATA OMIT - GUIDE FOR OLDER E MlENT. $355.00 (4) DATA QUEST - VOLM 1 6 26 . $675.00 (5) COLN (CRIBS/CROSS) DIR , . . . . . . $600.00 (6) PRICE INDEX lr'OR HUNNICUTT $900100 (7) GENERAL EST MANUAL UPD11TZ $65.00 9130 DEED, SALES, AND VALUE INFORHATION (Continued on next page) 1 t ( 92budgt2 1992 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 11 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASER AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR ACCT CIASSIFICATION TOTAL {DECREASED) 5130 DEED, SALES, AND VALUE INFORMATION (continued from previous page) (a) AIRCRAFT DIRECTORY . . . . . . . . $85.00 y (9) AVIATION STATISTICS . . . . . . . . . $70.00 (10) NATIONAL MARKET BLUE BOOK . . . . . . . $85.00 (11) AUTO AND TRUCK N.A.D.A. . . . . . . . . $70.00 (12) SREA MARKET DATA 1$45/HO. . . . . . . . $540.00 (13) MARSHALL AND SWIFT UPDATE . . . . . . . $337.95 (14) M.L.S. DENTON BOOKS . . . . . . . . . . $100.00 j (15) M.L.S. LEWISVILLE ON-LINE/ COMPUTER SERVICE !$95/M0. . . . . . $1,140.00 t (16) WE TARRANT CO BOARD OF REALTORS. . . . $220.00 i (17) MSC. OTHER SOURCES . . . . . . . . . . $490.00 4 (18) Ala= PHOTOS . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,000.00 (19) APT.SURVEY(BRIL",t RESEARCH) . . . . . . $200.00 (20) CAR COST GUIDE . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3140.00 (21) AVIATION TRADE IN BOOK. . . . . . . . . $82.00 (22) TRADE-A PLANE . . . . . . . . . $72.00 7 (23) VEHICLE REGISTRATION LIST . . . . . . . $600.00 t (24) POLK CITY DIRECTORY . . . . $84.00 51,130.00 {25 1 SREA COMP BOOKS - (26) MARSHAL SERVICES - 3 BETS . . . $362.85 (27) MaCLEAN HUNTER MKT RPRT-TRUCK BLUE BOOK $104.00 (28) POLICY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM VEHICLE FILE PROCESSING. $478.84 . NEW ITEMSt 29 D/FW APARTMENT REPORT . . . . $309.00 (30) D/FW OFFICE REPORT. . . . . . . . . . . $396.00 (31) D/FW SHOPPING CENTER REPORT $396.00 (32) D/rW INDUSTRIAL REPORT. . . . . . . $396.00 (33) TRENDS IN THE HOTEL INDUSTRY. $165.00 i (34) DALLAS METROPLEX INDUSTRIAL SURVEY. $110.00 (35) APARTMENT OPERATING EXPENSE REPORT. . . $36.00 (36) REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRENDS $110.00 (37) ZIP CODE DIRECTORY. . . . . . $34.90 (38) T=m ECONOMIC PUBLISHERS, INC. . . . . $100.25 (39) URBAN LAND INSTITUTE . $294.00 (40) OR DEN'PON BOARD OF REALTORS $49.60X12 . $595.20 (41) MARSHAL & SWIFT COMMERCIAL ESTIMATOR. . $489.00 (42) MARSHAL & SWIF'i' RESIDENTIAL ESTIMATOR . $365.00 (43) NEW MARKET REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL. $100.00 TOTAL SALES & VALUE INFO - ACCT N 5130 . . . $28,756.89 i i j I 1 • i i 1 r VI.., MMZ& OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 12 ' 1992 APPRAISAL 92budgt2 E%PLANATION OF EnENDITURSS, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL---- (DECREASED)_ E 1992 BUDGET + $33,887.16 $618.96 { 5132 PRINTING SERVICE . 1991 BUDGET + $33,268.20 THIS ACCOUNT I8 CHARGED FOR ALL ITEMS THAT ARE PRINTED. ! Baas BUDGET XTEM 18 CALCULATED AS FOLLOff s ~ a '(i) REAPPRAISAL NOTICESi QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE _ -TOTAL - $0.05 59,000.00 I{ ~ 180r000. ~(2) MICROFICHE COPIES OF REAPPRAISAL NOTICES: $7,500.00 ; i ~ (3) CERTIFIED TAX ROLLS ; PAGES B UNIT PRICE TOTAL 74tON' 74,000 $0.0793 $5,868.20 (4) CONTINUOUS FORM CHECKS. . . . . $3,050.00 (5) STATIONERY, ENVELOPES, BU8IN898 CARDS, mosTION YOM, INVOICES, LABELS, P.Nb VAR7.OUS STANDARD FORN9, ETC . $5,500.09 (6) PRINT BUDGET - 75 COPIES. $300.00 (7) MINT RENDITIONS. $850.00 (a) ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT - 75 COPIES $300.00 I NEW ~ (9) SALES LETTERS $10518.96 TOTAL PRINTING - ACCT M 5132. $33,887.16 ; i i mill! .H .fir i 1'pnggy j 92budgt2 1992 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 13 EXPLANATION OF EIPEZiDITURES, nxREASEB AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) - r --N- r-----r w rrrrrr _ M - - r 5133 OFFICE SUPPLIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1992 BUDGET - $43,295.00 ($11385.00) 1991 BUDGET r $44,680-00 THE OFFICE SUPPLY BUDGET IS COMPRISED OF THE FOLLOWM$ (1) DATA PROCESSING SUPPLIESe s (A) GREEN BAR STOCK FORMS - 1 PART s j CASES X UNIT PRICE ~ TOTAL 100 $45.00 S4,'S00.00 i (B) GREEN BAR STOCK FORMS - 2 PART { i CASES X UNIT PRICE TOTAL E 20 $60.00 $1,200.00 i j (C) APPRAISAL CARD FORMS QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE - TOTAL $0,015 $0.015 $91000.00 4 (D) MAGNETIC COMPUTER TAPESr QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE TOTAL ......r ..,,...wy00~-/-yr.. 30 ~ $30.00 $9.00 - (E) PRINTF.'k RIBBONS i QUANTITY I UNIT PRICE r TOTAL rr..rrr r-rrr-rrw. .........r 40 $50.00 $2,000.00 (2) MAPPING SUPPLIESr (A) = APERAD) ~ EA/PAIlSM PAPER i r ~ Al" I UNIT PRICE TOTAL r-.-.' - 100 $3.50 $350.00 5 i 3133 OFFICE SUPPLIES (continued on next Page) Ira. . 1 kfAiL'7J' v i 92budgt2 1992 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 14 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES ANU DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT i OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED----------)-- 5133 OFFICE SUPPLIES (continued from previous page) (9) HICROMM READER/PRINTER PAPER (CODED PAPER) ROLLS X UNIT PRICE TOTAL 10 - - $630,00 (C) VELUM NAPPING PAPER CARTON $ UNIT PRICE TOTAL 50 - $ Y $2,150.00 ' (D) ABSTRACT & MAP JACKETS FOR FLAT CABINETS j' , QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL i 400 $11.20-Y $4,480.00 (3) GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIESi { , (A) HAPSCO (DALLAS CO. & TARRANT CO,) ' SETS X UNIT PRICE TOTAL ' - z 15 $35.00 $525.00 (B) ENVELOPES QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE TOTAL 135,000y - - $0.03 $4,050.00 (C) RETURN HAIL STATIONWJ QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE . TOTAL 25,000 $0.222 $50550.00 (DD)) COPIER PAPEx W= R (180,00 pRIE 360 pl M.5) ` TOTAL 360 $3.50 $10260.00 3133 OFFICE SUPPLIES (continued on next page) I .V".. K k i page 15 1992 APPRAISAL OPERKsIQNS BUDGET 92budyt2 AND DES Egpj,ANATION OF EA1tDI3'URES' T2tCAEA3E3 IN!'RE113ED ' OR ACCOUNT 9'OTAL (DECREASED) ACCT - ______Y---CLASSIFICATION_-!- E 5133 OFFICE SUPPLIES (continued from previous Page) , (E),q,AtiEOUS - PENS , PENCILS , TYPEWitITER KWCENS/ FILE g'OLDERSI TAPE, ERASER3r $61500.00 ETC ETC $200.00 (F) BOOKS ON p.C., 9PRrADSHENTS -ACCT 4 5233. $43,295.00 TOTAL OFFICE SUPPLIES rrrrrrra.ir r $341849.12 ($555.88) . 1992 BUDGET 5134 FURNITURE & E4~T' 1992 BUDGET ' $35~405•00 1 (11 ADMIgTRATION DFPAR'TNIINT ASSE'TS' FOLDER (A) LE'= . TOTAL QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE $200.00 $200.00 ~I i 1 (g) FOUR DRAWER LEW1 FILE CABINET W/LOCK TOTAL UNI~F-pAICE - QUANTITY AMCDMTRATION DEPARTIMT ASS= (2) AfWJSAL SUPPORT DEPART1MIt ABeET9~ (A) COHTUTER SUMER STORAGE RAW '-ry{' 1. Y1 TOTAL QUAN'PI'1'~' R UNIT PRICE r Y...... $610. Fi0 .._....Y $305.00 2 t 5134 FURNI & EQU'VHW on next Pagel . , I 44 1 ~ AgSSNF1 : r I( i 92bu4gt2 1992 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 16 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES MCREA: ED i ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) s 5134 FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT (continued from previous page) I I (B) Fuijt DRAWER LATERAL FIDE CABINET W/LOCK i QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE + TOTAL j -1---° $300.00 $300_00 f TOTAL CLERICAL DEPARTMNT ASSETS $910.00 1 _ (3) DATA PROCESSING DEPARTMENT MSETSs 1 (A) COMP TERMI MLS (REPLACEMENT) QUANTITY S UNIT PRICE TOTAL -1--- $405.00 -$4,G60.00 (B) TAPE HANGING RACK ; QUANTITY E UNT.T PRICE + TOTAL f ---w-- 1 $403.00 $403.00 (C) SifiT 'LE7 MATRIX PRINTERS FOR PRMARY COMPUTER . REPLACVMT OF OLDER PRINTERS. E QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE TOTAL i - - $2,698.12 $2,698.12 1 (D) rim CABINETS QUANTM X UNIT ?RICO - TOTAL + - 2 5200.00 $400.00 1 (E) COMPUTER BINDER STORAGE RAM QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE TOTAL --Y 4 590.00 - $360.00 TOTAL DATA PROCESSING ASSETS $8,721.12 I~ V 5134 FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT (continued on next•page) MEN! i. i Page_ 17 92L,:dgt2 1992 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUMET EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURESI INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED j ACCOUNT OR TOTAL (DECREASED) ACCT CLASSIFTCATION_---- _-„_r_r__r _M_ 5134 FUR~lT.TURE & EQUIP MENT (oontinued from previous page) } t (4) RESEARCH o, TRANSFER ASSETS # 1 ~ (A) PT.'+'P CABINET QlfR2iTT4''i X uNIT PRICE - _TOTAL ---rNr- S5r618100 --2 $2,809.00 (B) ENdP. COPIER 5 YEAR LEASE PURCHASE ` TOTAL _ PAYt S X UNIT PP,ICE -r12 ° $18x000100 1,500100 TOTAL RESEARCH & TRANSFER ASSETS I I I . . $23»618.00 (5) CONIMCIAL d 1 + ♦,AND DEPARTHENT ASSETS j (A) FOUR DRAWER LEGAL sin FILE 4AEINE'1' W/TACK wIIy y p UNIT MCC • TOTAL {t $200100 rl 5200,00 t: (s) FOUR DRAWER LATERAL FILL MIKET W/TACK (?URNTI'PY X UNIT PRICE TOTAL $3w,06 $30.00 TOTAL COt@ MCIAL & LAND ASSETS 5500100 -_r_rr-rrr 1 (6) RESIDENTIAL PRAPt'ff' ASSETS' (A) FOUR DRAWER JUMO CABm"M W/TACKS j i QUANTITY Y UNIT PRICE " - TOTAL r YMr-r 00 YM..Y r.Y., LM1{IV 3 5200100 $V,{IfI TOTAL AL RESIDENTIAL ASSETS • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NN-$60.00 t k TURF & WUIPT - ACCT N 5134 , $341849.12 'TOTAL E'i7RNI wrrwrMrww- lSSiir 1 YCr{SSR+ Ij79 92budgt2 1992 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 18 i EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) 5135 OFFICE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1992 BUDGET r $9,200.00 $11800'00 1991 BUDGET - $7,400.00 j ALL MAINTENANCE OF OFFICE EqUIPMENT EXCEPT FOR THE COMPUTER AND COMPUTER PERIPHERALS 13 CHARGED TO THIS ACCOUNT. THE EQUIPMENT INCLUDES ALL TYPEWRITERS, ? ADDING MACHINES, FORMS BURSTER, BLUEPRINT MACHZNJ, AND COPIERS. ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASES IS i INCREASING THE EXPENSES CHARGEABLE TO THIS ACCOUNT. ~ r , TOTAL OFFICE EQUIPT MAW - ACCT N 5135. . $9,200.00 5136 DATA PROCESSING HAINTENANCE. . . . . . . . . 1992 BUDGET - $93,356.00 $5,960.00 1991 BUDGET r $87,396.00 THIS ACCOUNT IS COMPRISED OF BOTH DATA PROCESSING, HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE. BOTH ITEMS ARE CHARGED TO THI3 ACCOUNT $O THAT THE TOTAL COST OF DATA PROCESann WILL BE SHOWN IN ONE ACCOUNT. ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT I3 INCREASING THE USES IN THIS ACCOUNT. (1) HARDWARE MAINTENANCEt $24,916.00 1. MAINFRAME & ACCESSORIES . • , 2. 1200 LPN BAND PRINTER . . . . • . . $3,315.00 3. 600 LPN BAND PRINTER. . . . . . . . . $2,715.00 4. 600 LPN BAND PRINTER. . . . . . . . . $2,715.00 4. 5 EA. 515 MS DISK DRIVES. $5,600.00 5. 9-TRACK 6250/1600 BPI TAPE DRIVE. $10990.00 6. 9-TRACK 6250/1600 BPI TAPE DRIVE. $10990.00 7. VARIOUS HARDWARE CONNECTIONS, CABLE AND MOVING EQUIPMENT. . . . . . . . . $1,500.00 e. PC MAINTENANCE . . . . . . , . . , $2,000.00 9. UPS MAIZITEmcs , $2,200.00 (2) SOFTWARE HASNTENANCEi $12,415.00 1. CONTRACT MAINTENANCE. . 2. ACQUISITION OF VARIOUS SOFTWARE $11,500.00 RELEASES, . , . , , . . , . . . . j 3. DESIGNATED PROGRAFQiM EXPENSES $6,000,00 4. VARIOUS PROGRMltINf3 CHANGES $8,360.00 5. TRAINING ON PC AND WORD PROCESSING. $1,640,00 ` 6. MICRO COMPUTER PROGRAMMM. . . . . $4w TOTAL D.P. MAINT - ACCT 0 5136 . . . . . • $93,356.00 wrr.rrsrs. i SR { C N ry. } hJSfaS~ M 1. 92bndgt2 1992 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 19 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) - - i 5137 REGISTRATION, SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES 1992 BUDGET y $8,032.83 $2,409,38 t 1991 BUDGET r $5,623.45 THIS ACCOUNT IS CHARGED FOR ALL FlF,WRSHIP REGISTRA- TIONS, SUBSCRIPTIONS TO EDUCATIONAL MEDIA, AND 1 MEMBERSHIP DUES, i (1) TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS 25 MEMBERS 9 $40 PER YEAR EA. . . . . . $1,000.00 ; (2) INTERNATIONAL ASSOC. OF ASSESSING OFFICERS 2 MEMBERS @ $95 PER YEAR EA . . . . . . $190.00 ; (3) TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF APPRAISAL DISTRICTS $800.00 (4) DENTON AND LEWS1VILLE BD, OF REALTORS, $175.00 (5) BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EEXAHINERS 25 MEMBERS 0 $35 PER YEAR EA. . . . . . $875.00 (6) NORTH DALLAS TAAO. . . . . . . . . . . . $100.00 (7) WE TARRANT CO. BOARD OF REALTORS. S500.00 (8) VARIOUS FINANCIAL ORGANIZATIONS. $440.00 (9) NEWSPAPER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $94.00 $129. 01 (10) WALL STREET JOURNAL. . . . . . . . . . E (11) NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE DEALERS. . . . . . . $35.00 (12) TEXAS PARKS & RECREATIONS MAGAZINE . . . $10.00 (13) TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE . . . . . . . . . $250.00 (14) COBRA NOTIFICATION SERVICE . . . . . . . $828.00 (15) ZIP CODE DIRECORY. . . . . . . . . . $33.45 (16) EXECUTIVE STRATEGIES . . . . . . . . . . $75.00 (17) THE PERRYMAN REPORT. . . $99.00 NEW ITEMS (18) ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL ASSESSORS. $105.00 (19) AMERICAN PAYROLL ASSOCIATION . . $125.00 (20) CITY & STATE . . . . . . . . . . . . $25.00 (21) RECORDS MANAGEMF7NT ASSOCIATION . $100.00 " (22) TEXAS MONTHLY. . . . . . . $20.00 (23) TEXAS ASSOC. OF APPRAISAL DISTRICTS (ARB $90.00 (24) DENT W BOARD OF REALTORS . . . . . . . . $60.00 (25) PROPERTY TAX LEGISLATIVE SUMMARY . $125.00 (26) HUNGINGTON & ASSOCIATES. . . . . . $25.00 (27) TRENDS IN HOTEL INDUSTRY . . . . . . . . $162.38 (28) DALLAS AREA INDUSTRIAL MARKET SURVEY . $100.00 (29) HOF RESEARCH, INC . . . . . . . . . . . $1,472.00 TOTAL REGIS., SUBSC & DUES - ACCT N 5137 . $8,032.83 awwrwrn,wr " For property owners to read as they wait to see an appraiser. h I a .hMI r Page 20, 92budgt2 1992 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET E%PLANATION OF EXPENDITURES INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR TION TOTAL (DECREASED) ACCT CLASSIFICA 5138 SCHOOLS, . CONFERENCES, AND TRAVEL 1992 BUDGET w $27,700.00 $4 , 300 00 1991 BUDGET w $23,400.00 1 1 ( THIS BUDGET ITEM IS USED TO ACCOUNT FOR ALL EDUCATIONAL ; RELATED TRAINING AND TRAVEL. THE TRIPS TO AUSTIN TO PROTEST THE STATE PROPERTY TAX BOARD VALUE FINDINGS ARE ALSO CHARGED TO THIS ACCOUNT. THE SCHOOLS THAT ARE REFERENCED IN (A) ARE MANDATORY. f (1) REQUIRED APPRAISERS' SCROOLS' i REGISTRATION + LODGING + MEALS r COST PER COURSE $50.00 $160.00 $100.00 $310.00 NO. OF COST PER TOTAL % COURSE R COURSES $18,600.00 $310.00 f' ' 60' { (2) TRIPS TO AUSTIN FOR SPTB PROTESTi. $1 r60!0.00 $1x000,00 (3) DATA PROC. & SECRETARIAL TRAINTNGi $1x000.00 gL1W= RELATED SCHOOLSi . . . • . (S) DTMM ASSOCIATION ISTRICTS ANNUAL OMEETING~~ • . 51,200.00 NEW ITEHS, (6) SPTB APPRAISAL DISTRICT OPERATIONS $1200.00 SEMAR. . . . . . . . . 1500. 00 (7) TAAO ANNUAL METING- . . • • • ' ' ' ' $1,000.00 (8) AUTOMATED APPRAISAL SYSTEM UPDATE. . 8600.00 ON COURSE. (9) PAYROLL ADMMSTRATI _ TOTAL SCHOOLS & TRAVEL - ACCT 0 5138 . . . . $27,724.00 rrrrrrrwrr 1992 BUDGET r $67x098.00 $1,1¢0.00 5139 POSTAGE & FREIGHT. . . . 1991 BUDGET S60r938.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM IS COMUSM or THE FOLLOW13tGx i (1) REl1PPRAISAL NOTI;CESr WHICH ARE MAILED TO ALL PROMTY OWNERS Aim AGEM ON MAY 15TH 163,333 NOTICES 1 $.30 EA• $49,000.00 (2) GMMttAL CORRESPONDENCEr WHICY. INCLUDES $2x000.00 LETTERS & PACKAGES . • • • • • ' ' 5139 POSTAGE & FREIGHT (continued on next page) i JAI C 92budgt2 1992 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 21 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCFYASF.D ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL---_ (DECREASED)- 5139 POSTR(-E & FREIGHT (continued from previous page) (3) SUPPLEMENTAL VALUE NOTICES, WHICH ARE SENT s APPROXTHATELY 9 T116 S r 11100 NOTICES 4 $.30 EA. X 9 RAILINGS. . $3,000.00 (4) CERTIFIED HAIL FOR ARB ACTIVITY. . . , . $2,000.00 (5) LETTERS SOLICITING SALES WORHATION . , $3x750,00 (6) SENDING CHECKS To PAY BILLS. . . , , . , $600,00 (7) POSTAGE MAC1MM RENTAL, . $586,00 NEW • I'FEh49 a 00 (8) POSTAGE BOR. RENTAL, (2 EA. 1 $340). . • • $680$480..00 i } (9) POSTAGE MACHINE MAYN'1'ENACE . . . . • • . _ TOTAL POSTAGE & FREIGHT - ACCT 4 5139. . . $62,098.00 rrrrr~rrrr 5141 LEGAL NOTICES & ADVERTISING. 1992 BUDGET r $31000.00 $0.00 . 1991 BUDGET r $3,000.00 THIS ACCOUNT IS CHARGED FOR ADVERTISEMENTS IN NEWSPAPERS CONCERNING EXEMPTION MATTERS SUCH AS HOMESTEADS, OVER-651 DISABLED VETERANS, AND PRODUCTMTY VALUATION MATTERS. OTHER ADVERTISEMENTS HAVE TO DO WITH APPRAIM REV IV NOTICES, MISCELLANEOUS CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING, AND INVITATIONS TO BID. 1 TOTAL LEGAL NOTICES & ADVER - ACCT 4 5141. $3,000.00 ruwrsrr I 5143 MZCTRICrTY0 WATER & SEWER . . . . . • . . 1992 BUDGET r $230212.00 $0.00 1991 BUDGET - $23x212.00 THERE HAS BEEN 90 INDICATION THAT TIM CHARGES FOR THE mm BUDGETED IN THIS ACCOUNT Wrat, BE INCRF.1i. na. ACCORDINGLY, THIS BUDGET ITEM IS NOT BEING I"LABDD, TOTAL ELECTRIC, WATER & SEWER - ACCT it 5143. $23,212.00 rrrrrrrrrr . 5145 TELEPHONE. • 1992 BUDGET r $320528.28 $40809.90 { 1991 BUDGET r $27x718.38 f (1) LOCAL LINES - DENTON, $4,189,44 (2) LOCAL LINES - LEWIS'VILLE. $298.84 (3) HEM LINES . . . . . . . . , . 54,381.20 i' (4} WHO DISTANCE CHARGES, . $11,213,46 5148 TELEPHONE (continued on next page) V N. i K,.u4 Page 22 92budgt2 1992 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET EvLAK,TION OF ERPENDITURESo INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR TOTAL, (DECREASED) ACCT CLASSIFICATION - 5143 TELEPHONE (continued from previous page) (5) CHARGE FOR COMPUTER MODEM TO THE $288.00 SOFTWARE GROUP. (6) HUTIPL,E LISTING SERVICE TELEPHONE $2,890.56 COMPUTER LINES . $1,925,00 (7) QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE . . . . . (8) PURCHA4d OF DL CTORMI AUBREY $6.80 LX DrIUM $18.20 CARROLLTO $5.25 LMSVILL $16.25 D/FW $200.00 MCKINNEY $6.80 $253.30 i (9) MULTI-BUTTON PHONES (REPLACEMEti''). $10200.00 (10) PAYMENTS ON PHONE SYSTEM IN SOUTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE, $2,080,08 12 MONTHS Q $173.34 PER MONTH. . . . . . I, NEW ITEHi $800.00 (111 In= FOR TWO £A% MACHINES SERVICE LINE. $300.00 (12) AT&T LANGUAGE INTERPRETING (13) DATA LINES FOR SOUTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE $20708.40 ' $32r528.28 TOTAL TELEPHONE - ACCT N 5145. . a 5146 B CE, JANITORIAL SERVICES, 28,765.00 $10755.00 BUILDING MAINTE~AN AND GROUND MAINTENANCE . . . . . . . . . 1992 BUDGET $ 1991 BUDGET - $27,010.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM COMPRISES ALL BUILDING AND GROUNDS WjMMtAXCE, AT SOME POINT IN~SPENEAR dN rUTURE, LTHERE WILL HAVE TO BE SUBSTANTIAL PART, OR ALL 0£, THE AIR CONDITIONING UNI'1'a• (1) JANITORIAL SERVICBi PER MONTH K MONTHS ✓ r _ TOTAL_-_ ✓_»_Y-- $140400.00 $1,200.00 12 (2) GROUNDS MAINTENANCE SERVICE, PER MONTH X MONTHS • TOTAL 10 $40250.00 $425.00 E 5146 %U=114 MAINTENANCE+ JANITORIAL SERVICES, AND 4ROUND MAINTENANCE (continued on next page) } slltPtltllt-.. 1 Page 2 3 92budgt2 1992 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET EXPLANATION OF aPENDITURES, INCREAM AND DECREASF,S INCREASED ACCOUNT OR TOTAL (DECREASED) ACCT - CLASSIFICATION---------------------- --------:AL BUILDING MAINTO"CE+ J.4NITOR3ue SERVICES, AND GROUND minMENANCE (continued troroprevious page) (3) "BACK" Y.W MOWING PER HOWM X MONTHS - TOTAL 00^ 6 5460.00 (4) JANITORIAL SUPPLIES, TOTAL pzR MONTH g MONTHS- 12 $75.00 r (5) REFUSE PICK UP (TRPV) - TOTAL pa "ON" ~ MONTHS --g300.e0 $25.00 (6) AIR CONDITIONING HAINTENANCE QOARTORLY MAINTENANCE CONTRACTi TOTAL PER QUARTER X QUARTEW - -----.N- 140.00 4 $285,00 (7) AIR CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE AWITIONAL SERVICE, PER HOUR X HOURS - TOTAL N10« $350.00 $35.00 (g) EftlWaNATING BUILDING MONTHS - TOTAL Pi~R MONTH L: __««N_«_ «NNiNM 12 $900.00 $75.00 E (g) W= AND ANT CONTROLe MONTHS TOTAL PER MONTH It 3 $225.0P $15.00 5146 BUILDING MAIN'PENANCEr JANITORIAL SERVICES i AND GROUND MAINTENANCE (continued on next page) ItAUARft r tNALLIiU[, p. qe 24 92budgt2 1992 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR TOTAL (DECREASED) rr__ .._.._r_r------- ..r__----- ACCT __--r---- _CLASSIFICATION 5146 BUILDING MAINT£NA)lCE0 JANITORIAL SERVICES, I AND GROUND MAIN7W"CEf (continued from Previous pegs) (10) BUILDING, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUHBItiG $21000.00 YAINTEHA=i . • . . . . . , $480.00 (111 FIRE ALARM MATRT£)lANCE. . . .RING . $720.00 (12) BURGLAR AND EIRE ALARM $2 500,00 4, REPAIRS $150.00 FLAGS .ITIONER' . . f (13) EHERGEMY AM (14) PURCHASE $28,765.00 , BLDG & GROUND ZIAINT _ ACCT N 5146. r r rrrr..rw ~ TOTAL . f 720.00 + ~t 1992 BUDGET r $22,680.00 $ 5148 APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD 1991 BUDGET $21,960,00 THIS BUDGET ITEM IS CHARGED FOR PAYMENTS TO ARB HOMW j FOR hORK DURING THE MOATED VALUE EQUALIZATION PROCESS. (1) HAY, JUNE AND JULY MEEmm, j NUMBER OF PAY PER Nan or TOTAL PAY HMgaS X DAY EA. X HELTINGS- -$18,000100 9 $80.00 - 25 (2) DOUR (4) 9UPPLEME TAL ALL DAY 1EETING9~ T'rrAL NUMBER OF PAY PER NUMBER OF PAY !EMBERS X DAY EA. X MEETafGS rr i _rr -rr 4$20800-00 g $80.00 yj 13) FIVE (5) LUPPLZMWAL HALF DAY MEETnM i I PAY PER NUMBER OF TOTAL DER OF r PAY MEEam X DAY EA. X rrww $1,800.00 TOTAL ApPAAI9AL REVIEW BOARD - ACCT M 5148. $22,680.00 rr.rwrrrrr } $30,000 00 010,000.00) 1992 6UDGET 5152 CONTnXMNCY r 1991 BUDGET ' $40,000.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM WAS REDUCED IN ORDER I TO COMY WITH THE BUDGET REDUCTION. $30,000.00 ! FUWS FOR UNANTICIPATED EX.PENDnvm . • • rr,r+...... f bra... voAVA i i 92bUdgt2 1992 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 25 EXPLANATION OF E PlXDIT0M, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) f 1 , 5153 BUILDING & LANDS PAYMENT. . . . . 1992'BVDGM ■ $59,088.00 $0.00 i 1991 BUDGET r $59,088.00 s r THIS ACCOUNT IS CHARGED FOR TFffI PAY}OM ON THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT'S BUILDING AND IAND HOTS. w MONTHLY NUMBER OF TOTAL PAYMENTS X MONTHA X ACCT $153 j.. $4,924.00 "12 $590088.00 _ rrrrrrrrrr t 5154 BUILDING & LAND IMPROVEHENTS . . . . . . . . 1992 BUDGET r $25,290.00 $22{290.00' 1991 BUDGET r $3,000.00 THIS BUDGET rm IS CHARGED FOR CERTAIN ASSET ` ACQUISITIONS OR IMPROVEMENTS MADE ANNUALLY. (1) STORAGE BUILDING - 24' X 24', WIRED AND AIR CONDITIONED. . 515,000.00 (2) REMOVB WALLS AROUND STORAGE AREA AND RESEARCH & TRANSFER AND F`lPLAC0 CARPET,. $10,290.00 'DOTAL BLDG & LAND IMPR - ACCT M 5155 . . . . $250290.00 5155 MISCELLANEOUS. 1992 BUDGET r $7,430.00 $650.00 1991 BUDGET r $6,780.00 ITEMS THAT NILL NOT FIT IN ANO"= CATEGORY. (i) BANK SERVICE CHU N. . $150.00 (2) FI111 & FILM PROCL^SSYZIG $1,000.00 (3) HISCEIZANSOUS. . . . . . . . . . . $10000.00 (4) COFFEli CUPS. . $180.00 (5) PJOXMURSxm umomomw . $50000.00 (6) SAFE DEPOSIT BOX FOR COMPUTER TAPES. $100.00 . TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS - ACCT N 5155. $7x430.00 s i v ,t 3 92budgt2 1992 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 26 EXPLANATION OF MMMITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFTCATION TOTAL (DECREASED) - 5156 OTHER ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1992 BUDGET - $700.00 E11.00 ~ 1991 BUDGET - $700.00 THIS ACCOUNT IS USED TO PURCHASE MINOR ASSETS. (1) MEASURING wrmmi4i I QUANTITY I UNIT PRICE - TOTAL 5 $100.0@ $300.00 i (2) 100 FOOT MEASURING TAPESr' QUANTITY S UNIT PRICE + TOTAL 1®--- $200.010 TOTAL OTHER ASSETS - ACCT $ 5156. $700.00 i i r i I v , fs161;i 4 l r , Page 27 DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT BUDGET/92ALtAC1.55F 1992 APPRAISAL BUDG01 ALLOCATIONS WORKSHEET ALL FIGURES ARE ESTIHATES DENTON OUT OF 1992 % OF COUNTY BUDGET 1991 TOTAL COUNTY ALLOCATIONS ES CHARGES CHARGES LEVY ' JURISDICTIONS TAX ` Schools, $25,726.52 , $2,044,663.79 1.2001 $25,726.52 $11,328.55 ARGYLE ISD $900,358.13 0.529% 511,328.55 $358,046.80 ' AUBAElI ISD 5358,046-80 DENTON ISD $28,4561444.69 16.705% $110564.58 1 f $919,116.87 0.540% $110564.58 $430173.21 KRUH ISD $3,431,272.03 2.014% $43,173.21 5668,260,99 , LA1OL DAId.A•9 ISD 668,260.99 LEWI;+VILtZ ISD $53,111,302.73 30.737% $$15,796.54 $15,796 54 ISD $1,255,460.07 141% $110,181.38 $52,183.09 $162,364.47 893% $19,144.55 $10,089.32 $29,233.97 NoR tWESTISD $8,756,873.30 5. puOT POINT ISD $10521,548.97 0. 476.53 $7,476:53 ' $594,210.95 0.349% $7, $24,89116 PONDER ISD $1,978,271.56 1.161% $24-891_16 -,r BANGER LSD 62 1,357r663_22 r_,Y_272_._r41 - $ _r_.--.-- School Dist Totals $$102,,969,523 _09 _60,448% $1y295=590 81 $ 291,211.70 15.434% $3300803.24 se.ee $330,803.24 DFN'1'ON COUNTY $26, - _ Cities, 458.44 $2,458.44 $1950389.44 0.11-'3 $20 $1,054.00 1 CITY OF fiROYLE $83,768.56 0.049% $10054.00 $611.90 1 CITY QF AUBREY $aa,631,56 0.029% $611.90 $47,590.50 s 1 T01r(td OF BARTONVII,LE 53,778,371.16 2.218% $47,540.50 $9,95235 CITY OF THE COLONY $759411.71 0.446% $9,551.35 l TOWN OF CORINTH $1680467.55 { $13,3890276.14 7.860% $168,467.55 CITY OF DENTON ,61d.10 0.087% $1,857.32 $$1,857.32 ,014.CITY OF DOUBLET OAK $147 48,014.80 CITY OF FLowm HOW $3,816,066.80 2.240% $48,014, 145.58 0146.58 ` TOWN OF HACKBFRRY $110570.36 0.007% $$3x005.46 $25,361 74 TOWN OF HICKORY CREEK $238,864.37 0.140% $30005.46 CITY OF HIGHLAND VLG 52,0150672.10 1.183% 5211077.36 $1,077,36 . CITY OF JUSTIN - $85,625.59 0.050% $ r $332 $332.44 _ CITY OF KRUGERVILLE $26,421.51 0.016% .44 $884.82 CT, OF KRUH $70,323.10 0.041% $684.82 $4,905.69 DALLAS $389,685.65 0.229% $4,92099,72 $$299.72 CITY $29,820.68 0.014% $ 79.15 $137,399.75 Cm $10,9!3,813.48 6.407% $131,-20.54 $1,471.59 Cm OF OF LAL~ Lm 4! wownu VIL or LIons $1160937.67 0.069% $ r$77.3a $77.38 CITY MARSHALL CRK $6,50.06 0.0 $748,02 CITY TO"m OF OF V01M AKE $59,4450.02 0.035% 35% $785.09 $785.09 CITY OF OAK POINT' $62,396 34 0.037% 3$692.64 $3,692.84 0.172; $ '112.95 $112.95 CITY QF PILOT POINT 82931495.13 CITY 01' PONDER $13,745.70 0.008% $1,878.26 $125,435.46 0.074% $1,878,26 $4,252.63 C= OF ROANOKE $337x986.09 0.198% Sar252,63 $7,038.65 CITY or ,A = $559,409,64 0.328% $7,038,65 CITY TROPHY CLUB _ «..r rrrr---rr wrrn_nrrr rr.r_ ..-r..rr r 472 785.80 j $37,569,252,41 22.0551 r«_9472,706,65 r--------- - $-r Cities Totals -r_-_r-. _»rrr,_-°------ ' . . r -y z- Y t tt1 ~y ~..~l i~ n t~~R q='? i r. i s R~IW 1w MMfr.V.w.+~1~~A ~y~ w. f It ~ i E f t;_4-- [t ' ~ "j._i - ` rlet , 1' _ ~ ~':C ..r-~ a-> J li r L _ tom, Jt fem.. 1 I R , r ` l.~i _ F ~n fi~ ~I r ~ I i i t- " I 4 t k~: L., I I r I 11 I i r r ,f~ i- I .r 1 ` r!. f it I ' . . F ~ P r - f1~' ..r weJj a• till 1 . r ,"'nrt'~ 1 t ' ~,~,r. l i ~,Ar I A asOll i leer. fin all A_ ~,f`„ I FA r . . ~ ~ rS.~i ' ..7: c. ' y S rnuu ~ T 4 1 } ~ 5' 411 ''.lp. r - " t ~~•Ir`/ r of/' ~''i". j r - 1M11 ' - I x / a 1 10 / l 1 V[ r ~~jl i; . II r + J { a. s i ~Y 6' . 1 'f`i SIR t (~I~yp, IIYR Lt ~F jl)PIA '_r'II Iitl'M, 0 1 1 1 1 I!,`1 R~rpp)rll ~Ir M'IYIV1 Xis "Iq i 41M) +w'un .~-1114 rlqq Y. 4 4uU /1 i1R 1.. 1 ~ rr1 ti f - "A "A Ll 11 - 1 tltli4 Or,l )1 W. 11+L.,.~i 4W WI Iti ' r InVI 1>w! „r U " 1 . 4,• ~ i.✓.hl ~LH Y 1 ~.R11 i; I I Y .1-l 14u Mi ttMtl _ _x 1 4AtY Fl W A, I t -w- 4.1771 ill r notlF.'.. i i ' _ is i' Y ` 9 + PI d... K 1 A' 14 , ,J l 4r')Iru. 1 tJ a- 1 ( [vfY r~ - . Y IC r.xR It S t-~ - - - -'ye • 1 PI lKi.. M q, l,l e` AIR. Is l t. `3~, kwo",IVh11 xt _t t ! I ~ X1,1 3 Rl a V{ t i'. cf° ~ ~ Y ~y'_~ 40 Ir.. ?F' {.._4.. • C T .y r. -G";- .4.~ { ' ii ryyC 1 ~ } 1 tr,i ~ 4 ~'.7t ~ t~. ir' ~ s~ ~~'a: i i f 1 I y sJ' . 3, f . i.,.i~~•t s.- r.~td~l.1rat3cfr~fSS d.S+A.~:s'."''3+J~iYa4i44 jC1~SA.',{'ii+4~dr~I~±' ...wi:411AwI k/.. p er r. ~'t .~I f ter' ~ a~~~ i, ~1 4~~r,~•.e i. I .f I'-~, sir fi,,''~iir'~,r r .t.., ;y, ~Ti'.' „ ( ~:~,i~~ ~ ~•,~'•.+ar~'~j' ;t- 3 ~ .1 y. ~p`~s y '~I,, i~~.r~;'', # ~ t '•t ~ ti' f r }t ~4' 7 I~ :Lh ~i y+i~~`v~l~ ~,,y.+l 1~GjQ'11G~2" a t ,a I F a e t i'i r towpo :lop b N t LOCATO ' ...../Jnrw.+.:w1+r++~1••i ....~~-......wr.. ■I~+..,.. ~.~1!'/9 .....~4 + ..~.~..,"~.'~'T'r'1~LLMf 7W1 r(/+R" *tvo. Rf 1 L' .4. 11J 1~~}~M~fwF Fi i:..t+r.~.i.. rr Ty4`~.~wMnr ti'j.~w'. w...rw..r~..., ~41- In srw~.~ir L ...•r~r+.- • 7. _ ( .,r r I • v RI 1. i- ~ ~~Mia'I~CONG' i r. a ~ i T LINE u .r: - r 4 FUEL Puto I 9 f { % .~i % t~J f. , \\Y r r SfANDWGITYtf ' UErlIoN toNGr Q~q q , .a %OH0 t (MUL'n PAHCY ~cJe7) 9 Lr~f _ L 2o' UIIWTY 190. 11 k a the rte. 1 - s• -S _F Y 'tr ^1~ x,pe HrvprW~ > 41Hk, tC, 4~411X i. J !r fog WA7eQ U P.S rr n.,.........,....,.'«.........~.«,....~.~..~.,...~......,. !ry~~.rrr..p....«.«.....«......,....«... w. 'r s r - - - NT EMRr OF 51XISTa Ae-00 PAVME T>- If1Y1*I ~n wf1►rn I i i ~ , N11Y.rrNN rrrr N.l......•Y.IN,V rNlrNr.rr..rN.NNNrNV+Nr1Y.r4,IMIr.rNNNrNr N11 r.111NMr1 r, rrrrrlNrNN1.VNr1•INrYN.rVhl.rr.1.N.1......VIIIII.r.N1MN1I1HIrNN..~ww. N.N.NNNN~rNN 1 wMMll• .~N NN.WM1. iu...~~r.w.r.~r•••rw •n.Nwwwu~r..r.j.Nr,urlniw MN~w• • ~ ti I~":. . J~rlrrrrr rr.i.nr .rrr .•Y...rrr......r..rrrrYl.rrMriw.~.rrYr...r~.rrr.r.rr........rrr.rr.r .......................x.................YfYY.r I.N.M.r.INr........... rw.....NrY..N.wI1.VNN.INN...r,NI...Nrr.IN.....IN. N •....r.x.M r .N.1(....I.rr11.... N.r1... r...I r...NNrr r..r lr....rN 1.w r..1..r I..I.N. , , I . ---14W A6~24UVUFZALo 1 PP uHrr 6wE, K.OHE MRTc 4 NORTH AWJTVH PLANT LIST' uti ~ o~ . wE~sr 0,6035 ASE x (43,5~C0) : 35,0Gt7 9.f yT TYAaV= 2q,~t15~l~ 114Wi. ACRDX (43,e*o) G2,V4 5# ST9 E1Y : ?~l,~14 blp w 114 2g NAme 6? Y, Silos . NGT' R KIS dNE 51'o9Y buil,O(N(aGM~- *Ild *r). L,2~000 ip~! . oNE ht*jo WILaWv (~44YI Via -0 HX) ; 2,(pQ4e,P. u{ve AaK 4'I MIN! w1ol6. g'. p+ ~I.~!%oc TOT, ) (I5,10#'104 AW) , nAR~~ pY~ 125 5 r ai.. Wao. VK%ArA 50 CFA (9TR%T'^W) : Y111415-r, -sue- {21 I % of ~tRF.E1YARn) (~2 A614 LtA$M I P e low. 4rt I2N0. ' WH N(l ANO Wi%YES; ; 2~ 600 51F, IT+G' ~ I~RI I p, X94 "TOM IV rA~I. 4'0.6r (W-Sf/° cf V %L. AREA) (✓6,1 °lO. flF TO'EAI. AFB} 1 ' P, ; l2 'tom R b : 12 a ' US; I UNIT t*P,. EA 2 l3 1~1K1M~a~ 8A 5 h' U la , l QrY. SITE ewlwv. +*T. REMA 4) {V6 OAK i2 lop MIN, lolO , 61.0 DAKIWK'r _ 140 ~p Cn„ _ 241o.c. ToTALA, U» IT ou - west t UNEf or,; - emT r ~ ~Pc MYR1'l.L_ 4 i 1 a'• ~ RF.r: PLt►J 2.23 AcK9 x (43 5a0) = 41)J09 5.ty ; STK09YAKn 3'9 ,,241 91f PLANNING & DEVELOPMEN AVAH J"IN5 - 150 Isl ao, sflpw 1 RECEI TOTA;. E3UIWiliem Al l J9, &4+ till! (M-I0/a OFTdrAL ARC) DEPARTMENT VED ~fV p ZO f I VY ; '1 i AA;.r of c; t.A~,t SCAI'~n AR A 5'fK I+~ YARP) ; je Wj 6,1. (25.'1 ti OF TYARp)( 4.1/. rAKVJM6 AMP V91V h ' ; hbj3t4 6 1PY (0011 %OF VIAL AREA) r JUN 2 6X991 T.pM619 KWUIKO Wl' WPM, ALL A129A.S4 t4Or C0VVRw.0 flY GA'UNO CoVW 1'0 M C-AWAV I 9fQUIKE7 pA1ZKItiG : 93 y!°AL~S ; rK0 O09 1'ARKId4ro q3 ~iPAO r PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT HOV ALLoy~V~1!'S~ A?~ O Age** TO K WAI"W YI A V'V I4411N IJFJA,IW~f r DEPARTMENT ~r r~rr rrr y { r- 1 IA i =J i ` J ,r . .r ' Y r t fifr16t9Y '~Fa f i Page 28 BVDGET/92ALU)Cl.SSF DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT 1992 APPRAISAL BUDGET ALLOCATIONS WORKSHEET ALL FIGURES ARE ESTIMATES [ 4 or DENTON OUT Or 1992 COUNTY COUNT}( BUDGET 1991 ~ CHARGES CHARGES ALLOCATIONS s, AMISDICTIONS___ TAX LEVY LVVIZS TOTAL- Diatrictai CLEARCREEK NATERSHID $217.33 AUTHORITY $17,272.76 0.010% $217,33 $2,933.20 CORItiTH MUD $2330121.51 0.137% $2,933.20 DENTON COUNTY PIRE $429,68 DISTRICT $34,150,00 0.020% $429.68 DOM" COUNTY LEVY $4,677.30 IMMOV. DIST 41 $3710737.11 0.218% $4,677.30 $70293.84 DENTON COUNTY MID #2 $579,691.34 0,340% "$7,293.84 DENTON COUNTY ROAD & $12,200.06 U7mXrY t Dom, 41 $969,622.76 0.569% $120200.06 DENTON CO RECLAMATION $347,084.72 0,204% $4,366.74 $4,366$1,029.T4 .74 3 CII'T&YEB UT MJA DIST LAM C $81,855.68 0,048% $11029.93 { $11 245,02,E $880,038.47 0.517% $110072.89 - $172,13 TROPHY CLUB MUD 172 1d $44,393.09 ; $172.13 $3,514,544.36 2.063% $44,220.96 Special Dist Totals $1700344,531.55 10@.000% $2,143,321.67 $62.x523.69 $2,2M5,845.36 rrrrrrrrwrwwrrr wrrrsww rvrrrairrrrra rrrwwwrwrr rrwrrnrrr+.rw f TOTALS I j. 1 F Page 29 SALARIES SCHEDULE 1992 SALARY - TITLE-- - $57,530.50 CHIEF APPRAISER $46,827.33 DEPUTY CHIEF APPRAISER $45,438.86 DEPUTY CHIEF APPRAISER-ADMINISTRATION $400069.54 APPRAISAL, SUPERVISOR-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY $36,164-73 APPRAISAL SUPERVISOR-PERSONAL PROPER'T'Y $360866.04 i APPRAISAL SUpERVISOR-RESIDENTIAL PROP $38,902-48 DATA PROCESSING MANAGER $40,069.54 APPRAISAL SUPPORT MANAGER $26,000,00 RECORDS MANAGER MANAGER $28,000.00 SUPPLEMENTS & AGENT FORMS $27,787.36 SENIOR APPRAISAL SUPPORT & COL.L CLERK $150786.19 SENIOR APPRAISAL SUPPORT & COLE-SOUTH OFF $280526.63 pESEARCI & TRANSFER TECH III $22,008-71 ASSISTANT DATA PROCESSING $240503.68 SENIOR APPRAISAL SUPPORT & LOLL CLTIRK $220229.88 MICROCOMPUTER SPECIALIST $24,701.88 p,D}gNTSTRATM ASSISTANT $20,022.38 SENIOR RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECH II $29,773.46 SENIOR APPRAISER COMMERICAL & LAND $28,025.40 SENIOR APPRAISER PERSONAL PROPERTY $26,803.64 SENIOR APPRAISER RESIDEN'T'IAL PROP $26,675.87 , COMMERCIAL & LAND APPRAISER $22,402.50 I COtpfERCIAL & %X4D APPRAISER $18,958.80 I cmmcln & LAND APPRAISER $22,402.50 COMlOCIAL & LARD APPRAISER $18,639.76 PERSONAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $23,335,03 j PERSONAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $24,762.94 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $22,842.28 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $22,410.13 RESIDEN'T'IAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $180958.80 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $22,402.50 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $180339.67 APPRAISER 1 AESIDEtiTIAL+ PROPERTY $17,339-3 RESIDMaVI PROPERTY APPRAISER $14,082.18 APPRAISAL SUPPORT CLERK cum I S13,578.54 APPRAISAL ASSISTANT & COLLECTION $13,909-23 APPRAISAL ASSISTANT & COLLECTION CLERK 1 $10,078.55 p,RPRAISAL ASSISTANT & COLT, CLERK II-S OrYI $8,487.20 APPRAISAL ASSISTANT & COLL CLERK I-S OrrIC 5150145.21 INE'OPNATION SPECIALIST $16,672.41 I!1lORMATION SPECIALIST $15,145.21 INlORMATION SPECIALIST $160964.24 R WCH & TPANSrLR TECHNICIAN I $16,964-24 RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECHNICIAN I $15,661.13 + RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECWCIAN 1 $14,$30.60 G RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECHNICIAN I $14$73.30 pXC_VTIONIST $3,000.00 ARH SECRETARY & L-IAISON OFFICER $1,134,105.38 TiOTA,, rrrrrrrwror I I eITPSt4:Y it ! oWtlli %3 j ATTACHMENT 11 ~W DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT 1 3211 MORSE STREET P.O. BOX 2010 DENTON, TEXAS 76202.21116 al~sse.o4o4 JOE D. ROGERS, OTA/RPA1RTA Chief Appnfwr BOARD OF DIRECTORSI JOHN D. BROWN, RPA JON BECK, D"V Chief ApprWw OLARENCE MYE h*man JOE A. FORSYTHE RICHAAD Deputy Chief Appnhw-Adminietadm TROY W11►f3 i HORA" a (23~ I \ DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING JULY 18, 1991 4100 3911 MORSE DENTON, TEXAS ITEM 1s CONVENING OF MEETING ITEM 2r INVOCATION ITEM 31 APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING OF MAY 30, 1991 & JUNE 10, 1991 ITEM 41 PROGRESS REPORT APPRAISAL RELATED JOHN BROWN ADMINISTRATIVE & COLLECTIONS - JOE FORSYTHE LIAISON OFFICER KATHY PIERSON ITEM 5) APPROVE CONTRACT WITH DENTON ISD TO PROVIDE THE ASSESSING FUNCTION FOR DISD'S 1991 TAX ROLL ITEM 61 CONSIDER APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION FOR DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT'S DRUG ABUSE POLICY ITEM 71 CONSIDER APPROVAL OF DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT'$ TARDINESS PROCEDURE FOR PERSONNEL MANUAL ITEM Ss CONSIDER APPROVING THE DENTON COUNTY EDUCATIONAL DISTRICT'S APPOINTMENT OF DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT AS AOMINISTRATOR FOR THE COUNTY EDUCATIONAL DISTRICT ITEM 9s DISCUSS DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT'S NEWSPAPER ADVERTISING POLICY ITEM 10s AWARD OF BID - ENGINEERING COPIER i ITEM 111 PUBLIC HEARING ON 1992 DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT BUDGET ITEM 121 CONSIDER APPROVAL OF 1992 DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL nXSTRICT BUDGET ITEM 13s OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ITEM 14s ADJOURN I i V, ps: VuNNI CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 5, JUNE 25, 1991 The Council convened into the Work session at 5:15 p.m, in the civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberryl Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins; Council Members Chew, Perry, Smith and Trent. ABSENT; Council member Alexander 1. The council convened into the Executive SesCslton and discuss legal matters (considered action in Patel v. o ntment Gladden v. Cit real estate, and personnelofbo Denton Boards, c onsidered appointments to all City Commissions and Task Forces). The Council received an update and held a discussion 2• regarding the Truman Harp complaint. had Rick Svehla, Deputy City manager, stated that Mr. Harp appeared before Council to ask fort~se mea ps ess relief to the rear of his property. originally had two means of second drivewways leading h to access to the araper on his house and the head-in the original g 9 ty. In drainage easement and flume to the rear of his proper ' lled Ginnfr ntiofy the drainage the mid s the cit i 1 t wast illed the system an flume on the Harp's property. Svehla reviewed the four options available to solve the problem. option one would rebuild the driveway fofor the e Hand arp's the property r reconnecth ton the drainage hflume middleto al ` allow access to the rear of the property. Mr. Harp did not like that option and did not accept that, Option on the north pave a drive section equal in cost to option one side of the Harp property. This would connect to his existing yar d on drive and would have a . StaffmindicatedotohtheaHa p s that ha north aide w his home. driveway equalytoothe cost ofetheifirstuoptiontwouldabeubuilt, The driveway The Harp's felt this was not an acceptable solution. Option three, suggested by the Harp's, was to build tharratgratel t in inlet the mouth of the drainage flume. grate structureusuffi *open .nt to throat" take buiwhen ld compared to was is ry In inefficient the width amount nf the drainage the grate Banwould d wouldv havhad had bto the the same total in order to take water from the street. Option 20-25 feet long Harp's flume and the to theipwest de This pipe would terminate in an adjfaunacent property opeerrty ty inlet on the cul-de-sac one lot west of the 9' Costrfor costs for Option one and two were $2,000 - $3,000. Option three was $25,-300000 and the cost of Option four was r o provide felt that Council the apady to build a Option rone0o0r0 to ready to rwoiiflhetsoodesiredoandistafftwas stillndrecommendingieitheriof those two options. SY Nn'~ City of Denton City Council minutes j June 25, 1991 Page 2 Director for Utilities, provided Bob Nelson, Executive D complaint from the neighborhood information regarding a second comp leaking in the area. He stated that it showed a number of regarding possible sewage oints through a camera had been run had slipped e~some but that was not places where the There were some places where uncommon for lines of that age. the line was sufficient there were small. holes. The grading on to keep the flow moving. In order to have ground seepage, the line would have to be stopped. Staff felt that there was no sewer leakage in the area. The neighbors had complained about a bad smell in the area. Staff was suggesi g what the a dral n expo iron in the ground could be causing the desiredpbute from as technical Council could excessive $watr. 15eooo if etheline slogooo standpoint, there was not a wastewater problem in the area. Council, staff and tYe Harp's held a discussion regarding the testing of the grous, for bacteria, the constant tehe abissence li of ty water bubbling up froii the joints in the concrete, e size to handle the amount of homes on the line. of the pip the area Consensus of the Council was the tote~contin epic stin The results sewer e. of the spending the money on + of the tests would be brought to Council for consideration. The Council received a report and olicy andiproposed concerning a proposed City of Denton drug p of City i c ~ policy for investigation and inspection equipment/facilities. stated that the Tom Xlinck, Director of Personnel, Anti-Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation Policy was a drug to ensur a rug- the screening program work environment. that The was phi1°snPhygCOfs the City shad dbeenfrtc incorporate the Employee Assistance Program with that policy. The policy prohibited employees from manufacturing, using, ibutingr consuming or transporting possessing, selling, distr any controlled substance alcoholic business b orrwhen performingCJoh property when conducting City duties or Yes alsoilprohibited sift proper proceduresh were nnot medication was s followed* The policy directed that. testing fCOndltionsand~1~ alcohol be performed under the following ste current employees erfo ming jobreasonable duties ors)represe ti gatheaCity th Pl wa p current employees individua under r the influence of drugs or alcohol, (2) who were promote alln final o applicants iwrho wweren hired into oa Denton, and (3) Reseatoh had been done to t position with the City of Denton testing procedures were in ensure that the City uidelines fo; Federal Workplace ugs compliance with the mandatory g Dr for ' Drug. Testing Programs through the NationapatiT.nst ng PCute of Drugs and Alcoho). Abuse. Klinck reviewed the drugs and alcohol abuse. A%VHY.p 9K'stiY.kt r 1 , City of Denton city council Minutes June 25, 1991 Page 3 Klinck reviewed the policy for investigation and inspection of City equipment and facilities. He stated that the purpose of the policy wan not to invade the privacy of employees, but rather to give managers/supervisors the authority to have access es and equipment that was city-owned and to to facilities take action if something was discovered in the search that was believed to be inappropriate. Implementation of both policies were proposed to be effective on July 15, 1991. Training for managers and supervisors would be conducted on July 8 and 9 if Council approved the policies at the July 2 meeting. The Council convened into the Regular Session at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. 4 PRESENT; Mayor Castleberry) Mayor Pro Tem dopkins; Council Members Chew, Perry, Smith and Trent. ABSENT: Council Member Alexander 1. Pledge of Allegiance The Council and members of the audience recited the Pledge of Allegiance. A presentation was made by the Metroplex Pearl Harbor Survivors Association making Mayor Castleberry an honorary member in honor of his brother who was killed at Pearl Harbor. 2. The Council considered approval of the minutes of the Regular Session of June 9, 1991 and the Special Call Session of June 11, 1991. Trent motioned, Chew seconded to approve the minutes as - presented. Motion carried unanimously. 36 Citizen Reports A. The Council received a citizen report from Joe Dodd regarding pornography and the City franchise. Mr. Dodd stated that he wanted protection of children from pornography. He felt that material must be kept away from children and that they should not have access to it, tie felt cable television companies were allowing suc. material on t.v, where children could view it. He asked the Council to pressure the local District 'Attorney to investigate this situation as he < had made a formal complaint and did not feel it was being investigated properly. He also asked council to request the State Attorney General to look into the matter. He stated that individuals who were suppose to be investigating his complaint had not even seen the movie he was questioning. i , Vim" city of Denton City Council Minutes June 25, 1991 Page 4 4. Public Hearings public hearing and considered A. The Council held a pa 19 acre tract of land from adoption of an ordinance rezoning the Planned Development ) on District the soutthoeatst he A cogrricultural (A) ne District on property north of Windsor Drive, 91 on3iatgiway (The ts 77 and Riney Road, roval 4-1 and Zoning Commission recommended app Junen121 1991 meeting). The mayor opened the public hearing. the Denton First Seventh Day Marvin Matthews, pastor Of the Church was seeking They wanted Adventist Church, stated that relocate its site from boas 28 h ttpis location. reviously Pro erty had been p 111 to rezone the property by another owner, Th anChagriculturalt deable to signatio►8e zoned which k zoning and was requesting would allow them to build their church on that site, was for or Pro fern Hopkins asked if the proposed zoning wa 1 mayor I agriculture. agriculture zoning for Matthews stated yes that they 'could like ~ so that t.ie church could be built and then the entire property 1 buildings. addition& i replat later for any council Member Trent asked what was anticipated on the site other than the church. than the other t no parsonage. In the Matthews replied that tThere wwould ould bbe nothing church at this time, future there might be an auditorium and perhaps a chu current Y0414 Council Member smith stared that the site was cuw I sed at thi acres. How much of t1A land would be us time for the church including the parking Matthews replied that with improvements to Highway 77 and the , the property would be reduced to straightening of RineY Road approximately 5-10 acres. council Member perry asked how the buildings would be located on the property, would be built where the he current stated that d. The other portion nterewasupCnpoae ent retirement ce the property would be park/playground area. I f1'u.t4a kt~fv]t/ t r City of Denton City Council iminutes June 25, 1991 Page 5 Council Member Perry stated that the long-range plan 4rould be to landscape the property and keep it mowed and well maintained. Matthews replied Yes. Mrs. Melvin Dane staked that she lived next to the property Sand he sented pictures of the current stab~iltfonhthersiteebut was pwrae s not opposed to the church being concerned with the ma n e nw was actually built. She anteditheeplanned property development zoning 1 to remain in place until the church had ditotehelYest of build. she was concerned with what would happen the property. stated that in the original plat, Riney Road had Ralph Cardray to be straightened. He wanted that to be continued with the new zoning. Ralph Morrison stated that he was not opposed to the church but no one had seen any plans for development of the property. The present zoning would allow them to build the church and was restrictive. There were no definite plannesnat g Gofs time pay for the wing W for development. Piney more would small congregation t the sm on be difficult 14 acres for Road. He felt cut would o keep Robert Dane stated that the church did of nedd of p ange in zoning to build Lhe uto change thelzoning so as not to follow III, new plans, they wanted the regulations. j Mr. Matthews was allowed a five minute rebuttal. j , Matthews stated that the church had had possession of the property for only the last year and a half. The plans i doe current planned development were not what they wanted to be Current zonlcenterabutwthathwashnot whatuthey wanteduLo allow a retirement build. A chan~,te in zoning was needed in order to build a church. Council Member Trent asked what was being done to maintain the property. every that they had contracted old buildingsothat, ; Matthews replied the prop Y . needed to be removed. Council Member Trent asked if someone was being paid to mow the done. property every two weeks and if it indeed was being s VA, rzx'c'n{ City of Denton City Council Minutes June 25, 1991 Page 6 Matthews replied yes. The property had not been mowed near the trees but it could be done if required, The Mayor closed the public hearing, Karen Feshari, urban Planner, stated that the property had never been platted and that improvements would need to go through the platting process. She stated that perimeter paving and realignment of Riney Road would be required 'when the y ~ property was replatted, a sidewalk would be required along Riney Road and Highway 77, and 601 of right-of-way would be i required. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the { property would need to be platted. Drainage improvements would be needed at the south end and along the eastern boundary; of , the property. The Planning and Zoning commission had heard the 1 case on April 29, 1991 and recommended approval but it was discovered that some residents within the 200' radius were not notified. Thus the Commission had to rehear the case on June I 12, 1991 and again recommended approval. The property had had i a number of cases presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. In May of 1985, the Council approved a request for a change in zoning from agricultural to planned development for 31 single family detached lots and a three story retirement/recovery center. The property was located in a low intensity area and by downzoning the planned development, the intensity trips would be reduced. Council Member Perry stated that any future development would take into account the rerouting of Riney Road and the development of the cul-de-sac, Feshari stated that at the time the property would be developed and before a building permit were issued, the property would have to go through the platting process. All discussions of road improvements and who would be responsible for those improvements would be done in the platting process, All those issues would have to be resolved before a building permit could be issued. Council Member Perry asked if that also applied to the drainage improvements. d Feshari replied yes. Council Member Smith asked if the church could be built with the current planned development. Feshari replied no that the planned development allow a three story retirement center and 31 single family lots on the site but not a church. T City of Denton City Council Minutes .Tune 25, 1991 Page 7 City Manager Harrell stated that the only way the current zoning could stay in place and still build the church was to amend the planned development, The current planned development did not allow a church to be built on the site, Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins stated that a plan would need to be presented before the church was built. A church could be built at any location but a plan needed to be presented and followed before that church was built, i , Council Member Trent felt that it was unfair to the current owners to take the blame for the condition of the property caused by the previous owners, The following ordinance was considered: NO. 91-087 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) TO AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 14 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 77 AND RINEY ROADO NORTH OF WINDSOR DRIVE) PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF) AND I PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Trent motioned, Hopkins seconded to adopt the ordinance. On ►s roll vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins "aye," Smith "aye," Chew "aye," Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. j B. The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance amending Chapter 35 of the Code of Ordinances creating an Outdoor Amusement and Recroation District (OAR)) amending Chapter 34 of the code of Ordinances to provide an exception toparking lot paving requirements. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-0 at its June 120 1991 meeting,) The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor. No one splpke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. i i # NINNJ~ 1 i City of Denton City Council Minutes June 25, 1991 Page 8 stated that the proposed Harry Persuad, Senior Planner, ordinance would add an outdoor Amusement nt Proposed edistrict District to the code of Ordinances. rhose uses generally would include t adjacent 10residential h usestended to be a nuisance awas by nature . required large tracts of land for their operation o theentnast intended that th The OAR districtiwouldicreateeat dtdistricts as permitted uses. This was important due to t That of standards for use. tq general retail. The roblems in91e°familye Fairgrounds. associated with he p was rezoned from zoning property provide an alternative future, ' OAR district wassoilntended similar situations in the asking district to reve ro osed change in the parking Asaociated with the OAR waThea Cequiremusedwford allow par ds or lot paving requirements. on unpaved surfaces on land primarily rodeos. The following ordinance was considered: NO, 91-088 DE FOR TEXAS, AMENDING AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DNTON, oUTD ZONINGVI DISTRICT ER 35 AOF THE MUSEMENT CODE OF AND RECREATIONS ING OUTDOOR AM PROVIDING FOR R PROV DE NAN F EXCEPTION STOICPARKING DLOT CHAPTER 34 TO PROVIDING FORA PAVING REQUIREMENTS FOR FAIRGROUNDSt PENALTY NOT TOEXCEED $2f000 FOR VIOLATIO14S THEREOF1 AND PROVIDING OR Chew seconded to adopt the Ord chew nance. O Hopkins motioned, " Hopkins "aye," Smith "ay Motion carried roll vote, r aentnd "are' MayoC Castleberry "aye.' P e zry "ayes " d unanimously, and considered C, The. Council held a public the hearing deDenton City- r amendinggChapter 3 of the Code of join Airport an zoning ng Bo rd; abol Ordinances to provide for the creatowersfand duties t of the commission and setting forth nathe pow Commission recommended commission. (The Planning al Airport Board d d adoption by a vote °OAp and th it 17e 1991jiP at the joint meeting held The Mayor opened the public hearing. George Gilkeson stated that this ordinance was needed to protect the Airport. r City of Denton City Council Minutes June 25, 1991 Page 9 Gerald Mitchell stated that he was not really in opposition to animmediate d place of ethehBOa~d's the proposal kebut, inas a formed s like ofetheo time the to be p i meetings. City manager Harrell stated that if the ordinance of were initial he would notify staff to inform Mr. Mitchell t meeting plus subsequent meetings i,f he so desired. N The Mayor closed the public hearing. Persuad, senior Planner, stated that the current Harry Municipal Airport Regulation was thePtst fEy re°Upetermine19the Those regulations were used by building development near the Airport. Originally this was a joint City-County Board as the City,s population was under 500000. Now that Denton's population was over 50,000 a joint in staff board was no longer needed. The nurren regulat ons excluded n update land use compatibility zoning. would review the current FA into uanements pdatedd ordfnancete 1The use compatibility zoning Planning- and Zoning Commission and the Airport Advisory Board Air whi Commi wou comprieddeof six members withithree m mbersnfrom the Comm ssion and three and three members from thCouuntydJointeAirporte Z ni g aBoardoand abolish the Denton City- create an Airport zoning commission. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 91-089 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ABOLISHING THE DENTON CITY-COUNTY JOINT AIRPORT ZONING BOARDI AMENDING CHAPTER3 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO PROVIDE FOR THE CREATION OF AN AIRPORT ZONING COMMISSION; SETTING FORTH THE POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Trent motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On toll vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins "aye," Smith "aye," Chew "aye, perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry aye. Motion carried unanimously. 5. onsent Agenda Perry motioned, Smith seconded to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Motion carried unanimously. i Y it I City of Denton City council minutes June 25, 1991 Page 10 A. Bids and Purchase orders: 1. Bid #1249 - Carroll Blvd. Turn Lane 2. Bid #1257 - Asphalt-Emulsion Road Materials 3. P,O. #13892 - DBS Escher Wyss B. Tax Refunds 1. Considered approval of a tax refund to Golden Triangle/Cencor Realty Services. C. Plats and Replats 1. Considered a preliminary replat of the Denton North Addition from Unit 10 Block 1 into Lots 1-E and 1-W. The 2.3006 acre site was located on the northeast corner of U.S. Highway 77 and Fallmeadow Street. (The Planning and zoning commission recommended approval 5-0 at its June 12, 1991 meeting.) 6. ordinances i f A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. (5.A.2. - Bid #1257) The following ordinance was considered: NO. 91-090 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES) PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOREI AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motioned, Hopkins seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins "aye," Smith "aye," Chew "aye," Perry "aye," and mayor Castleberry "aye.* Motion carried unanimously. -he council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bads and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements, (5,A.1, - Bid #1249) w The following ordinance was considered: 4 } i i 7o 1 1 (((flflfl~j~ a7A4.tlpE r city of Denton city council Minutes rune 25, 1991 Page 11 NO. 91-091 k AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS) PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR) AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motioned, Hopkins seconded to adopt the ordinance. On i roll vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins "ayeSmith *aye," Chew "aye," i- Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye," Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases } of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. (5.A.3. - P.O. #13892) The following ordinance was considered: NO. 91-092 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS ~ f FOR EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS) AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motioned, Trent seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins "aye," Smith "aye," Chew "aye,"' Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry *aye." Motion carried unanimously i D, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance amending the scnedUle of electric rates by adopting an amended Schedule TS (Thermal Storage Incentive Rate). (The Public Utilities Board recommended approval). Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that the Public Utilities Board recommended revising the Thermal Storage rate in order to increase incentive payments to the customer' from the current level of $150/kw of storage to $250/kw of storage for the first 500 kw shifted off-peak and $125/kw for any addit,~ionaI kw shifted. This rate would be matching the incentive offered by TU Electric. Currently there were no customers on this rate but at least two customers were p°aaently exploring this option. By increasing the incentive payment, it was hoped that this option would be more attractive to a customer. otmmAj' City of Denton City Council Minutes June 25, 1991 Page 12 The following ordinance was considered: NO. 91-093 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING + " THE SCHEDULE OF ELECTRIC RATES BY ADOPTING AN AMENDED SCHEDULE TS (THERMAL STORAGE INCENTIVE RATE)) AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motioned, Perry seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll i vote, Trent "aye,* Hopkins "aye," Smith "aye,* Chew "aye," Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry *aye.* Motion carried ' unanimously. i E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving agreements for judgement for pending litigation between the City of Denton and Melton H. Woodson. i The following ordinance was considered: f NO. 91-094 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DEiiTON, TEXAS, APPROVING AGREEMENTS FOR JUDGEMENT FOR PENDING LITIGATION BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND MELTON H. WOODSON$ AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins "aye," Smith "aye," Chew "aye;" Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 7. Resolutions A. The Council considered approval, of a resolution accepting Minute Order Number 91656 adopted by the Texas Highway Commission regarding improvements to Farm to Market Road 24991 accepting Minute Order Number 91657 adapted by the Texas Highway Commission regarding' the extension of Farm to Market Road 2499 and Loop 288. Rink Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that these Orders would continue to move this project which would build a road from DFW to Denton. It was a long process but inexpensive process Rfrom the City's standpoint, This was a level 2 authorization which would allow the City to proceed with the acquisition of the right-of-way, The first Minute Orde would allow the City to proceed with the acquisition for the section of Highway 2499 from PM407 to FM2181. The second Minute Order gave level 2 designation for the extension of Loop 286 from Spencer Road to FM2181. The level 2 designation also put the extension on the FM system and the Loop on the state system + assuming the city did the route studies, the alignment studies { and established the right-of-way requirements. Cornith had already passed the Minute Orders and the County and Highland Village were working on passage. krtkJ(AINAt ~ `eNNyp77 l City of Denton City Council Minutes June 25, 1991 Page 1.3 Council Member Trent asked about municipalities the activity of the other . Svehla replied that , had been they were very involved, Highland village commitmentsorfong a n the southern section. They had verbal Cornith had been proximately 75-808 of the right-of-way. n wo king very actively in the last six months in contacting land owners for right-of-way in their area. I City Manager Harrell stated that these were one of the most crucial transportation links for the City for the future. With the State Highway Department's funding being would be beneficial to allocate city funds toshelpmwith+ the extension of the Loop and the upper portion of Highway 2499 to persuade the State to keep this as a high priority and keep it moving ahead. The following resolution was considered; NO. R91-037 A' RESOLUTION ACCEPTING MINUTE ORDER N "AB ER 91656 ADOPTED By THE TEXAS, HIGHWAY COMMISSION REGARDING IMPROVEMENTS TO FARM TO MARKET ROAD 2499] ACCEPTING MINUTE ORDER NUMBER 91657 ADOPTED BY THE TEXAS HIGHWAY COMMISSION REGARDING THE EXTENSION OF FARM TO MARKET ROAD 2499 AND LOOP 2881 AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motioned. Hopkins seconded to approve ` roll vo„e, Trent "aye," Hopkins "a e + the Chew ~na eon Perry aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." a Motion carried unanimously, temporarily cl he C tncil considered approval of a resolution p.m, a 10;00 g he 135E Frontage Road on July 4, from 7:00 P.M,, for the Kiwanis Fireworks Spectacular, The following resolution was considered; NO. R91-038 A RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY CLOSING INTERSTATE 35-,E FRONTAGE ROAD, FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH AVENUE E TO ~TS INTERSECTION WITH BONNIE BRAE ON JULY 4, 19911 AND PROVIDING AN EFf'ECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned.. phew seconded to approve the resolution, On Perry vote, Tent aye " Hopkins `aye," SmithM"aye," Chew "aye," unanimously, and Mayor Castleberry aye, Motion carried r j I 1 ti~~re ks~'SilY p~i+j ` 1r lilil ~t~ Rss3(6i3#~ PI r City of Denton City Council Minutes June 25, 1991 Page 14 8. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. A. Receive a report from the Council Subcommittee i and hold a discussion regarding a proposed reception for the retiring Council Members and Board/Commission members and take appropriate action. ' Council Member Smith stated that the reception would be held t July 30 at the Visual Arts Center from 7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. The retiring Council Members and the retiring members of the , Boards and Commissions would be honored, There would be a i short presentation honoring the retiring Board/Commission members at 8:00 p.m., oath of office for new members at 8:15 p.m. and a presentation honoring the retiring Council members j at 8:30 p.m. The event would be catered. Plaques would be presented to the retiring Council Members and retiring Board members plus resolutions of appreciation. Consensus of the Council was to proceed. 9. There was no official action on Executive Session ` items discussed during the Work Session Executive session. i 10. New Business ' The following items of new business were suggested by Council ! Members for future agendas; A. Mayor Castleberry asked staff to draft a proposed I ordinance prohibiting retiring Council Members from doing business with the City for a period of one year, 11. The Council then convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters (considered action in Patel v. Cf,ty and Gladden v. Cit real estate, and personne ,oar appointments cons dered appointments to all City of Denton Boards, Commissions and Task Forces), No official action was taken. With no further business, the meeting was adjOLU:ned. 808 CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 1 ! JENNIFER WALTER, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 3407C s i+SS22. 1 4Fty;(.t j 7 CITY of DENTON CITY 1991CIL MINU'PES JULY 2, i The Council convened into the work Session at 5,15 p.m, in the Civil Defense Room. Council Mayor Castlebetry, mayor Pro Tem Hopkins; Members Alexander, Chew. Perry, Smith and Trent PRESENT, ABSENTt None The Council convened into the Executive Session to nd I discuss legal matters (considered claim Of Michas estate,~n aand ' considered action in Pa~v-- ointments to all personnel/board appointments (oonandeCTask Forces.) City of Denton Boards, Commissions The Council held a discussion and considered the Mayor i~ 2 . Budget issues Report, otthat the Purpose nog the f the ssues City Manager Stated of t Lloyd Harrell, ecti report was to highlight the mst that would be submitted presentation of the 1,991-92 budq It also divided the budget into council by the end of JulY I items two parts the macro and micro items, The major budget items The macro budget i 1 represented the macro budget Items- were those mayor issues that made a difference budget for the community for the next few Years, The micro se et items were the details of the budget which included wise U funds if in the deplmimttsubecause ofe flatoassessedapropetty ' d pac towth and other revenue I difficult £ ia valuation, limited inles pace rewith° current service level 1 91 i sources not keep g expenditures. In addition. the 1991-'92 budget we'.+ld be the first year to experience the hpact of the Freeport Amendment which decreased the amount of available assessed property. The draft proposed budget was established with the continuing philosophy of retaining the city's fiscal _integr ity, while keeping curront levels of services Detailed back-up information was included in the agenda materials and can be found in the agenda pacOt information. The fallowing represents a summary of that inf!ormat1.on, Major Issues General Fund General Fund Reserve - trio adopted goal of Council had of the lot of (3aneral been to maintain this balance between ilizin955nhed0 Fund expenditulltes. Staff was reoommandinhelp balance 91-92 unreserved balance in order to ected unreserved balance to j budget. This would reduce the proj 10.88% of the total expenditUrss. f i } M 'Y le ' r 1 .V }I f City of Denton city council Minutes July 2. 1991 Page 2 2. Fire Station M6 - it was anticipated that the opening ' of the station would be in October 1992. New employees would bo hired by April 1992 to allow for adequate training prior to i' the opening of the station. Staff was recommending the option to allocate $190,000 for 1991-92 Which allowed for the hiring ~ of eight firefighters in April. In addition, staff would recommend the appointment of a citizen committee to work with council to decide which station (#I of $3) would be closed when Station #G was opened, what location was appropriate for the relocation station, and what future use should be made of f Stations 01 and #3. Due to a time constraint, this item was continued during "Miscellaneous Matters from the City Manager". j 3. Presentation and discussion of the Capital Improvement Program. 1 j This item was considered during the Regular Session. The Council coivened into the Regular Session at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Cht.mbers. j PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Council Members Perry, Smith k and Trent, ABSENT: Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins; Council Members Alexander and Chew 1. Pledge of Allegiance The Council and members of the audience recited the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Consent Agenda Mayor Pro Hopkins joined the meeting. Perry motioned, Smith seconded to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. i Council Member Trent stated that the base price of the unit was $39,140 * The final price of the unit was $89,000. He asked what ca~sei the increase in the price. Council Members Alexander and Chew joined the meeting. Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that the unit was used to determine metals in wastewater. The added features would assist in automatic testing which would reduce labor costs. i ' eql A;9`~ City of Denton City Council Minutes July 2, 1991 k Page 3 Howard Martin, Director - Environmental Operations and Financial Administration, stated that the basic unit would not detect levels of metals in water. The basic unit would work ' for sludge but the levels were harder to analyze in Water. other improvements to the basic unit would reduce aet-up time and allow a degree of automation which would release the lab technician-to do other types of testing. Council Member Trent asked if this Unit could be used with other agencies. Martin replied that prior Council response was that the City testing samples for other cities in the area would be in direct competition with private laboratories and council did not want that done. It could be done if the council so desired. On roll vote, Trent , aye., Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," smith "aye." Chew aye, Perry „aye, and Mayor Castleberry "aye," Motion carried unanimously. A. Bids and Purchase orders: 1, Bid #1256 - Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer r, 3, ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts fo,: the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services, (2.A.1, - Bid #1256) The following ordinance was considered: NO. 91-095 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING A COMPETITIVE SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE PROVIDING MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES: EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motioned, Trent seconded to adopt the ordinance. on roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Smith "aye," Chow "aye," Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously, B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance prohibiting the parking of vehicles on both sides of West Oak to Interstate Highway street Bras Street, from Bonnie providing a severability clause: ands p Citizens a Tpeanafflity no Safety exceed two hundred dollars. ( Support commission recommended approval.) he C 1 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 2, 1991 Page 4 Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that West Oak had recently been redone into a four lane divided facility Parking had been occurring in the multi-family areas. There had been a request from one of the owner* of the multi-family units to remove the parking. The other owners had been contacted and there was no one in opposition. The following ordinance was considered; NO. 91-096 I AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF VEHICLES ON BOTH SIDES OF WEST OAK STREET, FROM BONNIE BRAE STREET TO INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35: PROVIDING A SEVERASILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING3 A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS, AND j DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motioned, Alexander seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent laye,„ Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Smith "aye," Chew "aye," Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye.,, Motion carried unanimously. C., The Council considered adoption of an ordinance amending the interim wastewater disposal contract between the City of Denton and the City of Argyle extending the contract term to January 1, 1992. (The Public Utilities Board recommended approval.) Bob Nelson, Executive Director for utilities, stated that this was the second extension of the original contract which was approved by Council in 1989. The contract provided wastewater treatment services for the Argyle Independent School District while the Argyle wastewater source main project was being constructed. Argyle was unable to complete the wastewater force main as originally scheduled because of project delays, The second extension expired on June 30, 1991 and the proposed extension would expire on January 1 1942. The fallowing ordinance was considered; NO, 91-097 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE CITY OF ARGYLE PROVIDIN0 FOR INTERIM WASTEWATER DISPOSAL SERVICES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motioned, Trent seconded to adopt the ordinance, On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye." Hopkins "aye," Smith "aye," Chew "aye," Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motiot• carried Unanimously. 1 1 t wi IPYi. f City of Denton City Council Minutes July 2, 1991 Page 5 D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute a contract with Carl G. Mycoff and Associates for executive search consulting services for recruitment and placement of a Director of Electric Utilities, Bob Nelson, Executive Director for UtilitieA, stated that staff was recommending retaining the firm because of its expertise and understanding of national utility operations, knowledge of E the City's electric utility operations, and a proven track l record with the City, - i i Council Member Trent asked if there was anyone in-house who could be considered for the position. Nelson replied that there was no in-house candidate with the expertise needed to fill the position. The following ordinance was considered: r NO. 91-098 i AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN j AGREEMENT BE'T'WEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND MYCOFF AND ASSOCIATES, INC. RELATING TO EMPLOYMENT SEARCH f' SERVICES; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. I Chew motioned, Perry seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Smith "aye," Chew "aye," Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye," Motion carried unanimously. E E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance prohibiting parking in certain public cemeteries except for cemetery related purposes; and providing for a maximum penalty of $200 for violations thereof. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that the ordinance had been as a result of a request from Council Memher Chew, There had been problems in the Oakwood Cemetery with parking during athletic events. Currently there was no ordinance which restricted parking in the cemeteries and the proposed ordinance would give police officers the ability to control the parking. The follo*ng ordinance was considered; i` , City of Denton City Council Minutes July 2, 1991 Page 6 NO. 91-099 ON, P ETERIE55r EXCEPT ITFOR AN ORDIINANCNE ~ ERTAINCI PUBLIC E CEM PARKING VIDING CEMETERY RELATED D PURPOSES; VPRO IOLATIONS FTHEREpMAXIp D PENALTY O ~ PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Chew motioned, Perry seconded to adopt the ordinance. naroll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander aye, Hopkins aye, "ayeIth Motion Chew "aye." Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry carried unanimously. q, Resolutions A. The council considered approval of ahresolution approving the Capital Improvement Plan ng andoZoning bCommisgion and and zoning Commission. (The Planning the Public Utilities Board recommended approval.) Ci,arter required the City Manager Harrell stated that the City Planned capitaliimprovementsnprogrammwhich was then filed with propo Council, The plan did not commit the City to any 'i the City funding mechanisms specific capital projects as thfoYethesimprovements. must be adopted eacb year to pay it Detailed information concerning the plan was submitted for agenda back-up and can be located in the agenda packet mateciaio, i resented the Bob Nelson, Executive Director Majorfopr jects would include an water Utility projects. water, tz~atment plant one per station and 3 million andaddition water of tr a a tonsmin ssi mioln line, li :.gallon capacity ground storage, ane two million gallon elevated storage tank, upgrade of miscellaneous water lines and development plan water lines. the Ernie Tullos, Director Electric Utilities, cts presincentled uded e. Electric Department projects. Major p j pipe booster er conversion, and a dispatch t rbinel generating unitline, over Co an nd Howard Martin, Director Environmental Operations and Financial4t Administration, presented the wastewater utility projects which included improvements to the he s asrtew ter , ewe treatment plant, collection system upgrade replacements, development plan lines and mobile equipment. ' I , f IMS r d Ih '.1 7 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 2, 1991 Page 7 Hill Angelo, Director-Community Services, stated major projects s, for Community Services included communications equipment, computer equipment, office support equipment, mobile equipment and bond issues, t John McGrane, Executive Director for Finance, presented the t General Government projects which included engineering, 1 planning, drainage and airport projects for the years 1991-1996, G , : Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins expressed a concern with the language of the resolution. She wanted to make sure it did not limit council or require Council to make the recommended expenditures, City Manager Harrell stated that there were two steps required to initiate the projects. First, the projects needed to be in an adopted budget or a voter approved bond project and second, the Council would have to approve the bids in order to do the project. The following resolution was considered: M N0. R91-039 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CAPITAL, IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROPOSED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Alexander seconded to approve the resolution, On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Smith "aye," Chew "aye," Percy "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered approval of a resolutioa adopting a personnel policy relating to Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation. City Manager Harrell stated that the most important portion of ,,,he policy dealt with the testing element, Testing would be done for finalistn for all City positions, reasonable suspicion of employees, and safety sensitive promotions, Tom Klinck, Director of Personnel, stated that this policy would provide the tool for a drug-free work place. Mayor Pro; Tem Hopkins stated that she would like to see a change in a portion of the policy prohibiting literature supportive of, instructive or, or advocating illegal drug or substance use. It was felt that deletion of that phrase would strengthen the City's legal position of the policy. I j ,NIA$a1 FY.:w w r . Yel~RYSi City of Denton city council minutes July 2, 1991 Page 8 The fallowing resolution was considered: NO. R91-09n A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PERSONNEL POLICY RELATING TO SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND REHABILITATION; AND PROVIDING AN EF'F'ECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motioned, Chew seconded approving the resolution with a deletion of I.A,3, ,and literature supportive of, instructive or, or advocating illegal drug or substance use,, on ? of u n „ , 12. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander aye, Hopkins ❑ge aye," .I Smith "aye," Chew "aye," Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered approval of a resolution adopting an Investigation and Inspection Policy. Tom Klinck, Director of Personnel, stated that this was a companion poll<,y with the previous policy. It assisted managers and oupervisors in searches of City property, facilities, and equipment when employee misconduct was suspected. it also provided for the normal gathering of information in city facilities. The following resolution was considered: NO. R91-091 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ADOPTING AN INVESTIGATION AND INSPECTION POLICY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EF'F'ECTIVE DATE, Alexander motioned, Trent seconded to approve the resolution; On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye, Smith "aye,' Chew "aye," Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council considered approval of a resolution adopting a personnel policy relating to a Drug and Alcohol Free Workplace , Tom Klinck, Director of Personnel, stated that this resolution would change the Drug Free Workplace Policy to the Drug and Alcohol Fjee Workplace policy to include the prohibition of alcohol use in the work environment as required by recent legislative changes. i f narrsa 1i xrz.3aa,7 r craw-.~~ City of Denton city Council Minutes July 2, 1991 Page 9 The following resolution was considered: NO. R91-042 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PERSONNEL POLICY RELATING TO A DRUG AND ALCOHOL FREE WORKPLACE: AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, i Perry motioned, Trent seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Smith "aye," Chew "aye," Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. E E. The Council was to consider approval of a resolution authorizing Amendment No.' 2 to the Airport Commercial Operator Lease Agreement between the City of Denton and Fox-51 Limited. (The Airport Advisory Boor,d recommended approval.) This item was removed from the agenda. 5. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. City Manager Harrell continued with the Major Budget Issues Report. i 3. Ambulance placement at fire stations - the current budget allocated $42,804 to upgrade all of the reserve ambulances to front line ambulances and to purchase one additional ambulance, Staff was recommending that the ambulance upgrade and purchase be approved so that this important community service could be enhanced. 4. Demolition of substandard structures - the City's current program for demolition was funded primarily from Community Development Block Grant funds. The $15,000 allocated would demolish between 15 and 20 structuros (.-pending on size and conbcruction of the structures, The proposed budget allocated $15,000 from the General Fund to allow for the demolition of another 15 to 20 structures. 5. Pay plan implementation - in 1989 the City hired the consulting firm of Mercer Meidinger Hansen, Inc, to review and make recommendations regarding its compensation plan. The recommenndped philosophy from the study would be to manage a compenodtion plan around the m?.d-point or "market" range, Staff was recommending that a phai3ed program be established to fully implement the plan and that all positions falling below j the minimum level be brought up to that level in the 199192 budget effective January 1, 1992. IiMM1YdVR j' M1l'Irt7~ City of Denton City Council Minutes July 2, 1991 Page 10 6. Salary adjustments - the Mercer study also recommended that the City revise its formal pay plan by eliminating step increases and across the board market adjustment increases. In place of these two increases, City employees would receive an annual increase based on performance. Staff was recommending to give a 3% salary adjustment effective no later than January 1, 1992, Any employee who received a compensation increase of more than 3% because of a reclassification would not be eligible for this group Performance payment. The individual performance plan would be fully implemented in 1992-93. f, Council Member Alexander stated that he was not sure he was in favor of not allowing a reclassified person to receive the 38 general adjustment, City manager Harrell replied that some employees who were ' reclassified would receive a large increase and staff was trying to give everyone at least a 3% increase. 7. Benefits adjustments - the benefits adjustment that was in the proposed 1992 budget was for health insurance increases. Staff was recommending that the health insurance increase for the employee be funded. 8, Revenues A. Property Tax - due to the Freeport Amendment and the minimal granting of the tax roll assessed valuation, staff was recommending aneincrease of either $,03 or $,04 per $100 valuation. A $,03 increase would result in a tax rate of $,6851 per $100 valuation and would allow for the replacement of lost Freeport Exemption revenues and help fund a minimal increase to help offset the marginal assessed valuation growth and fund a minimal building repair program, A $,04 increase allow flexibility to improve operations in the$critical would cited above. B. Sales Tax - until a trend could be established to determine if the local economy was accelerating its growth rate, staff was recommending a 21 growth projection. C. Other Revenues - staff was recommending a variety of increases in fines and fees as noted in the back-up. 9• positions - the only new positions recommended for the 1991-92 budget were eight firefighters associated with the opening of station six. In addition, three positions were recommended for elimination - Quest Coordinator, Engineering Technician I and Engineering Technician II, . ;w., ,~yTKl City of Denton City Council Minutes July 2, 1991 Page 11 10. Other agency contributions A. Human Services - staff's recommendation was that because of the extremely tight budget, funding should be at the current year level. of $115,600. Per the request of the Human Services Committee, that committee should be asked to reallocate these funds among the various agencies. The Committee should be requested to follow Council policy and not recommend funding for health related agencies, + i , B. Transportation - the proposed budget provided ? funding for SPAN and HandiHop at the same funding level as the current budget of $46,000. SPAN had requested that funding be increased for 1991-92 by $16,000. 11. Tax exemptions for persons over 65 - since the 1988-89 budget, the Council had agreed to establish a goal of raising the exemption to $25,000. The current exemption was $19,000 and staff was recommending a $1,000 increase in the exemption for the 1991-92 fiscal year. 12. Split tax payments - staff was recommending the elimination of the split tax payment option as elderly homeowners now had the option of making quarterly payment and the majority of users of the option were businesses and not homeowners as originally designed. Street Improvements - Council budget questionnaire 13. indicated that street maintenance and street construction was a top priority of the Council, staff recommended maintaining thi, current budget allocation and to seriously investigate callintit a street bond election by January 1, 1992. 14. Building improvements - because of the critical building improvement needs and in recognition of limited resources, staff recommended that 1/4 of $.ol tax increase be allocated for debt service on Certificates of Obligation. 15. Take home Vehicle Program staff was recommending that this program be continued as the maintenance costs of this program were essentially the same as a fleet system and any other costs savings were minimal when compared with the other benefits that the City received. 16, F4creation program funding - a review of the recreatiolt program fund was included in the back-up materials per a request from Council. 17. Internal auditor - as no new positions were being recommended in the 1991--92 budget other than the required fire fighters for Station six, staff was committed to alternative ways of accomplishing internal audit services, A proposed plan would be brought to Council at a future meeting, 5 F Acs city of Denton City council minutes July 2, 1991 Page 12 Major issues - Utilities The proposed Utility Operations Budget for 1991-92 allocated total revenues of $86,132,000 and expenditures of $84,911,832. The revenues were based on a 38 reduction in electric rates, a 108 increase in water rates and a 158 increase in wastewater rates. The net amount of theca rate cutlgleltywbill byCSlightly average residential customer's monthly more than $4. Program Inspector In pthe Wastewater Department wto Passiat twith osit!,)as were being proposed new industrial pretreatment regulatory requirements. Major changes in the sanitation budget involved the city becoming the sole provider of solid waste serv3ceaompactorsould require ethe purchase of 2 additional trucks, and 2 coeibudget. Theretwass noAratef increase$ proposed in the proposed r the 1991-92 budget for residor commercial services but a ential A supplemental 158 rata increase was proposed at the land The 4 package dealing with curbaide recycling was proposed. was The Public Utilities Board felt that curbside recycling policy decision that should be determined by the it tc cil, urbside baseline budget included funds to continue a p recycling project. in addition to the positions o m r i a driver in eidential positions, two additional laborer solid waste were being proposed, Exe 6. There was no official action takession Executive Session items discussed during the Work S session. - 7, New Business The following item of N010 Business was suggested by council for future agendas: A. Co+ancil Member Trent asked for an update on the collection rate ~'or ambulance services, J 8, The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters (considered claim of Michael W iCson aand nd considered action l (considered appointments to all personnel/board appo.intments City of Denton Boards, commissions and Task Forces.) fi 6141 n . j , r City of Denton city council minutes i July 2, 1991 Page 13 i No official action was taken. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned) 1 BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS I , JENNIFER WAL12RS CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DFNTON TEXAS 3410C i II { 1 1 I , 1 h k h DATE: 07/16/91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO.' Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTS Z-91-006 AMEND A DETAILED SITE PLAN ON A PORTION OF PLANNED DEVELOPMUT NO. 8 RECOMMENDATION: Planning and zoning Commission recommends approval 5-0. i f SUMMARY: j The applicant is requesting to reconfigure the building footprint into two (2) buildings. In addition, the gross square footage approved in the original Detailed Plan would be reduced. BACKGROUNDS i See History section of P&z Report. , PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: E City departmenter neighbors, applicants FISCAL IMPACT: i N/A Reaps lly_submit e GWW.1001 //1 Prepared bye Lloyd V, Harrell City Manager E.` Kar n K. eshari ur n Planner Approv s 1 Fran It. ROb ins- AICP Executive Dire0tot Planning and nevelopmeF,t 2723x r r ci KUM] f i PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT To: Mayor and Members of tre City Council. Case No,: Z-91-006 Meeting Dates July 160 1991 l l GENERAL INFORMATION Applicants Aliasghar Amaniafrakti 721 Smoke Rise Denton, TX 76205 Current Owners First State Bank of Denton 101 S. Locust I Denton, TX 76201 i Requested Actions Amend a portion of Planned Development No. 8 Detailed Plan for the purpose of reconfiguring the layout of the plan in f order to allow for a convenience store with gasoline pumps. I ~ Location and size: 2.30 acres located on the northeast corner t of Fallmeadow and North Elm (U.S, Hwy, 77) Surrounding Land Use and zoning: North - Planned Development 8 (multi-family) i South - SF 7 (residential) East - Planned Development 8 (multi-family) West - Planned Development 8 (multi-family). ; Denton Development Plans ; Low Intensity Area SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportations I Sidewalks will be required along the frontages of Fallmeadow and North Elm. All ingress/egress is acceptable. An executed and recorded declaration of restriction will be required for shared parking prior to issuance of a building permit. V. 1 c (Case z-91-006) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued) Utilities; Water Jae alon the e se There is as 6" wate6r~ lw xterline whichasruns d along F North dElm There is (Hwy. 77). Sewer There is a 6" sanitary sewer line which runs along North Elm (Hwy, 77). r Firef1ow Fireflow is adequate for this site, Fire Department Both buildings will require an automatic sprinkler system. I Permits required from the Eire Department: lines to gasoline pumps, 1, Installation of supply 2. Installation of three 8,000-gallon undergrouacd storage gasoline tanks, in 3. Installation of an automatic extinguishing system hood for deli area. Ele_ctt is The City of Denton Electric Utilities has three (3) phase south, and east sides of this r overhead lines on the north, property. f rirainage: This site drains towards Fallmeadow. All site drainage should go this direction and not onto adjacent property, { ' A site grading plan and parking lot plan will be required with the building plans. erosion control standards applicable during the ` City construction phase will be applicable. Landscapings The detailed landscaping plan is acceptable and conforms to the current landscape and tree preservation ordinance, R1Y'M)?is (Cas Z-91-006) Page Three HISTORY 01i October 13, 1970, the City Council approved the annexation of a 29.0 acre 3ract of land and zoned it Planned Development (Ordinance 70-)• On December 21 1970, the City Council approved a concept plan development conditions for a mixed 70~53pment comprised of single use family and duplex lots (Ordinance ro a detailed plan on a ved On July 1, 1986, the City Council app SIM) for tthe purposes of ca rgeneral. 2.8 acre tract . 7 Northlocated Fallmeadow and Hwy( totalling 26,100 sq, ft. (Ordinance retail shopping center 86-121) and Zoning commission recommended On June 13, 1991, the Planning j approval (5-0)• 1 I ANALYSIS in a low intensity area. { ete This tract of land is located 3 Intensity trips were allocated at the time the detailed ~hsite plan for this particular tract wasrbland use$sl).however, appears to be no changeN to the approved there is a reduction of overall square footage of the shopping center. shopping center which i This site was approved as a retail s comprising included a convenience store with gasoline pumps Li Of 26,100 square feet. The applicant is requesting a change q, fte 21644 building footPrint to two the convenience )storerand deli iand216,000 s. ft. ft. of L building ffor or a strip shopping center with the fatal sq• building 18x644• A table of permitted uses is attached. ! Intensity Analysis Reproved Trips: 1,566 (26,100 sq. ft /11000 x 60) j TtequestnnofnTrips: 1 447.36 (185664-s1,118.64j000 x 60) Reductio i Landscaping, as shown on the Tplans amount .1% of s trees y rd and 20.7% of the total site. ordinance, landscape ordina requirements of the In addition, the amended site plan Cefle tplaa shows eduction of height of the buildings. The app height as 25 ft. The proposed plan shows maximum hegs 20 etch building 16 and the canopy over the gasoline pumps j .Tllli~G . v2:.dV.v?~j (Case Z-91-006) Page Four ANALYSIS (continued) In summary, the proposed amendment is in conformance with the Denton Development Plan. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of r Z-91-046 C ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition. -2. Approve petition with additional conditions, 3. Table the petition. 4. Postpone consideration to a date certain and continue public hearing, 5. Deny petition. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Reduced Copy of Amended Detailed Plan 3. Table of Permitted Uses 1 4. Relation to the Denton Development Plan 5. Draft copy of minutes of P&Z Meeting of June 12p 1991. 2082e i , { i E y ATTACHMENT 1 Z91-006 PD - 8 NORTH Raegl~-a DEL DR. r SCHL. ARDENY[EW G~®®4 EVER5 MEAOOWYIEW y~ PARK € CIR, . ABE C ~j AtLMEA CSR. EN.IIMAN ORUZ ~I N YMCA ~ WINDSOR u- 'r l s C NQRTHR100F HIRE DLIE -MAROLIA f OAR L MIMOSA w _ HEADLEE ~r z LL / K ILL q Q LU R~O~EW STRATA DRIVE CD DRIYF; . J 1 s„ _ Y_ i-:,: 'S'w; i r: rcmn~~.crn,o i,ar t ~ i' J i _ ~ w I ~1 ~ t I ii i i i i }I :L Lit n' ~~~i ' ~ ' f., ~ : ~ o.~ tsus Hess tenter Yu ster es 1:1 ~ ~ ~ iE' A I II~ 18.42 Business Center 7.0 stories 2.1 - ~ ' I~~~~~~~ u.A~ r Z45.78 i ~ a ~ ~I~I Q 200. ~q 1 f~ 3 ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ I ~ I~~II yMaximum heights of individual fond uses will be governed by the I ~ ~ y~ ~,I Development Standards for that use. Tract IF will be restricted ~A ~ ` ' I ~ i~~ to one (1) story. PJo siructura vial exceed two (2) stories west I ~ ~ ~~1 of tract IF within 500-feet of thu west boundary of the existing i~,,;',`~~~~ i ~ 44'estgale neighborhood. Q ~ I C ~ ' II IJo industrial bui~din will F- ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ gs be permitted on Tract IE or on the i , ~ iE II portions o1 Tracts IC and ID which are within 500--feet of the ~ ~ , ~ ,~1 ~ ~I west boundary of the existing Westgate neighborhood. i ~'\`~~~A~ ~1 .t 1 ~ , Fr Z ~ i p r ,-,A~~~~ ~o' , ~ , ~i a I' i i ~ . ~ y' ~ II ~ `a ~ U 'q t ~ - ~ ` \ i .y .4. 1 _°',~+~`~r R~AQ E ~ ~ , , ~ FAR REGULATIONS t !J ~ ~ ~ ~ III i i i,, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I I r>~~ ~ ` ' II ~ III - I ~ _ - r, , t ..Jl----- fi,'~~; I ~ SET nor, .r, i ` ~ P I~ AREA NORTH of ~ ~ ~ I ~src~re; 1.7 ' rlA r <ti . , } ■ • ...r ~L • ,.l L . EXCEED 1.5;) i I r'~i L~ 1 ''I II } ~ i 3 ~ ~ ~ i = wESTGATE s. R~ r ~U~,. ~ w i xi II Jul ~N r" AREA souTH of I r~stc~TE: ot~RAU. iIAIOMUM 1 i FAR SHALL NOT r ~ ~ EkCFEO 0.73;1 I HILLCREST CENTER ~ ~f;S.. li DENTDN, TEXA8 AANCNO YIATA ~i DEYlL01,1fANT C4AfPAMf X~r.~~ I ii' '4, _ _ Gi 'i;~ . s~. r~r 4 a~., #;1, e i; !'i~~ Ai } ~ a., ~J ,t~ , r ' ~ s :-:+t , i ~ ~i t:., ` ~ `R,,,'~ , I;~~ r x y'tr:. . ~iyv-ll 4 -tl t_...--•{l{~~v ~M 1l. ncanwtt rrw f,b ~y t i ~ I 's j I i I i i I i i I ~ F \ I i E ' i . II~ j] ~ g EXISTING WESTGATE \ 1 7-7 I Nv~ g~O~~ 0 50 100 200 4 1 W .4W ~ 1 J`' 0 I I OFFICE USE ~ ONE STORY scarf: a'=too' II~ 1~ ' k t t ~ i ~I`~ i t. i { ~ nl! ~ ~ I ~1 \ \ \ .922 _.L 2900 .._!._.._.._..rl I S i \ \ BARROW DRIVE ~ I i \ hl i04 • r~ I \ ~.._.._.._..l -a~ cli I \ r i I r~ I s 1. \ I _I to II ~i I 200' J \ \ •300', \ ;n i \ i ig ij ! ! s k •M I i \ N i ' 1 I z I I I~ I I TRACT TRACT IC I m ~ Z Q (/1 N < IN I~ I I N. N N' C14 C14 PI)~ - i n F 1 Z NI I i t I l \ TRACT IF OFFICE USE - _ --i iN ~ \ nur ntnnv. N• \ ~ MI I I I ~ RANCHO VISTA WESTGATE I ~ I I~ w! { I \ ~ CANDY LANE r.._,._,._,.._.._.._.. /`n~. i ~ i ~ ~ . s ; w~~ ';LEI :f ~ ~ ~ ~ I a I BRICK COL. I ~ ~ _ _ , . -1 1 I ~ ~ ~~AS PER SPEC. 'r} r ~V A ~ °I f I I M1, y~ \ --1 hn I , ~~]i~' -a r, ,N , ~ ~ I i I ;j 3~ . ~ \ \ \ I REFER TO BRICK ' ! I I ~ \ WALL DETAIL F ` ` _ _ - BRICK PANEL -__L-- \ \ ~ _ , . _ -1 IM I j ~ "i I ~ AS PER SPEC. ~ ~ - I - i ~ \ \ \ i i I I i I I Y J~fLL~f``; • \ ~ o I I~ \RRfCK WALL MI I I ~ ; A ~6' ,HIGHV ~ ~ i t o I' I I ~ 4 ~~REFER TQ~ . . I z SPEC.~DETAIL I ' , , , I ~ ~ \ I rl.._.._.._ . 1, ~ ~ ~ i of I _ ~ i I I •f .._.._.......I to I ~ TRACT IC \ v ~ o I"' I~ I I EK15T1NG I 0 n. , Z O GRADE ' ~ S u ~ RETENTION POD ~ ..GATE ^ ' r J , ~ FLADGER DRIVE . ~ _ _ , ..J ~ ~ - ~ , r ' v. _ I I I 3 AC, f \ 2921 ' r _ 2917 ~ T ~ - ~ ~ 2901 ~ I T \ ~ I CONCRETE PIERS AT ~ I I ~ COL LOCATIONS I I . }y {Tl goo' I i i : I ~ _ _ _ , _ , _ . _ . _ I I _ L ,1.. . _ . _ , BRICK WALL DETAIL REFER TO SPEC. i I N T,S. Y 1 uu~~ HILLCREST CENTER 1 .-54' ` DEMTOt~, TEXAB i}' RAMCIIO YATA O[YlLOM~llff COiI'AMY K~lIIf1yHOfp ~ Y.: si rep • f~ f' ~i 7 :`t t _ x '-,1`.Y ~~,Y. „rEi . ' . r 'ik' ~i~f ~i ; rl s r.;' i i; F I. E sra4 rte _ -w'.ke ♦.a. NNLy w ~i ~ tir~:'j ~~f~ l~•~ nlYfey.rl► \ ~\f\ ~ ~'~.Yr~o.ro-> 1 \ ,L'~ ~ ' i64~j ~rf 1 r+ ~ .'~~w°S.. f'. • ,.•~,tia Le] ' .I I I~ 7 7c?k ~ I / n&vw e'wa.Gnb. n+nr•e--- _ W X 'I Rte, e..r+on[r / y/RL[G1 eeo YL, y ,F 1 77 - (w.~~+•r~~~ Y M`~ ~ y- « bra w~ wwn r..r~._iZ. kh V_~ ~j A NM itl ' • ~I~ •1FM . 4'•U.MFI/1. 'I w'7•V Mm' ti SHMMI• . Rft:•4 y'41'wNd•' k~ fYk/r• t 1K AI WWI i iwrr.e-. ~.w:re eretRnw,kw,rw!,•t~.L_..-.- (A"W,44 IN) I,AMDbQArS reo.►Eor.IMra MW~ API to OWI rAM~} M.MK ow 04t+(a1,4kd1+H,N0 CI YrC'W. t•!~Or... nnvarwow( .oow> react { 1►LANTUST *A1116 1Lw cw ,'oa•wea eNMa°k+116<O s ddrr.)aw.j [ !t'*441+ wsa •Yf r es . ooco- ,,,,wr aws l.erdex w7 y41. Nlt yry wcyWAI tlrlei'WVy+ ~Mk M. •AMLNN}.1•CWK1 CM.7kw414Cd') . r yr,. .c. VIA nS1'+M/1 !YM/°+'•~MY! M.4e•V. as•L ) w fee' _ _ a.t N`. a rw •W ew++F J Jwi'a d a All . * wt "4 /eew+M A'/+Ar J A M'cYe r+e'b/eP+'M uY: N I•'~ ►LANT LIST w4 LH eat ~LV°eeo wrw W' A ek+LK . MMy.. yH. 4+7M •Jk'~ .p'1. }o`•'.i [ 7n M •1M 1 4`"{ RI• }41•) It H° 060. iS4 LA1 NLMP.rA,a f/M A tOJ:•y19 •1Y•°•J19dkllt'r/M1SL;°• j fa I'- + ;•}r, e, I41 + tsbw•wl. Yt V' YMlw.M. l4' nc P tvH 'MA&F A4,+6»d vN• (-IAW7 YR!~ it~ °r _ YN+ :l.•D4Llf/7 OVA ( • u •ro : ".~L/ p.•..art•1 U0410 I 1 WI AIL 1•e•6 +OL [°+e/L+N 6"1 t/aebMlMMb 01&111 nU11:4 11 MTL/• , f4s4'•1/ 4!M<Yi ~1 A`1d° ! ALL A s el w•'YIO h' /MpMT' Mf'Ywr AIMeRIM~ - i t t ATTACHMENT 3 TABLE OF PERMITTED USES Retail Sales Establih men I Any establishment wherein the primary occupation is the sale or rental of merchandise or goods in small • quantities, in broken lots or parcels, not in bulk, for use or ; consumption by the immediate purchaser. For the purpose of this ordinance, however, retail sales establishments shall not be deemed to include mortuary or funeral parlor, pawn shop, second-hand stores, used furniture or rummage sale, animal clinic or hospital with outside runs or pens. Personal Service Establishments Any establishment wherein the primary occupation is the repair, care of, maintenance or customizing of personal properties that are worn or carried about the person or are a physical component of the person. For the i purpose of 'this ordinance, personal service establishments shall include but need not be limited to barber shops beauty parlors, pet grooming establishments, laundering, cleaning and other garment servicing establishments, tailors, dressmaking shops, shoe cleaning or repair shops, and other similar places of business. Othgr Perm tte Usess Eating Establishments Video Rental store Safe Deposit Boxes :Professional offices Medical Offices Health Studios Laundromat Small Appliance Repair shops Dry Cleaners Bookstore Gasoline services On-Premise sale of wine and beer Travel Agency Off- Premise sale of wine and beer I IS'd 17 r ~'t141M P&Z Minutes June 12 1991 Page 7 s Mr. Holt stated that he appreciates the comments that were made. The people most directly affected by this development seem to be satisfied. it is tough to make decisions that ' will effect residential areas, The Commission does not want ! to adversely affect them. The people probably perceive that something is going to happen on their west side. He would have preferred not to extend the development to the south and it was a hard decision, He thinks that the proposed road layout will protect the neighborhood. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). V. Denton North Addition A. Z-91-006 Hold a public hearing and consider amending a detailed site plan for Planned Development 8, located on the northeast corner of North Elm and Fallmeadow for the purpose of reconfiguring the building layout, h Ten notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the site; two were received back in favor of the petition. staff Report; Ms, Feshari presented the staff report (attached). She noted that Engineering has made some minor changes to the detailed plan to aid internal j circulation. The drawing will be changed prior to City council. 1 i Mr. Engelbrecht asked if there are any parameters for on-premise consumption of alcohol. Does it make the local crime rate go up? He asked if the utilities were required to be underground for the entire PD, Ms, Feshari stated that staff is asking that the underground utilities requirement be removed for this site only. Staff does not have any cost figures but it could double the cost of development. On question, she ` stated that the city has already put in overhead `lines all around the site. Petitioner: Mike Cordell stated that the property is owned by First state sank, The convenience store will be sold off. The rest of the development can be completed by someone else in the future. The bank has no immediate plans to build. The design is aesthetically pleasing and there has been no opposition to their plans, They have gone to some expense, with architects and engineers to make the design as nice as possible, The City engineers will design the water lines. They have put thought into this project to make it something good for the community, i I NE! 9 i, t~{Fp71{; P&Z Minutes June 12, 1991 Page B ; Mr. salmon showed a transparency of the proposed change to the circulation, A minor change faas made on the western most entrance, It was squared up and given a bigger radius. Recommendation: Ms, Feshari stated that staff recommends approval of 9-91-006 with the following conditions: ti 1) The sale of off-,premise and on-premise consumption of beer and wine be added to the table of permitted ; uses, and 2) The underground power line condition be removed. ` Vice-chairman Holt closed the public hearing, Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of Z-91-006 with the conditions recommended by staff. Motion was seconded by Mr. Holt. Mr. Engelbrecht stated that he has a problem removing the underground utility condition. The City has discussed spending money to replace poles in other parts of the city. He asked if the condition applied to all the lines around the site. It appears to only apply to one line. ff Ms. Feshari said that the requirement says that all i electrical distribution lines in the area of the detailed plan are to be located underground. Motion failed (1-4). Mr. Glasscock voted yes. Mr. Kamman moved to recommend approval of Z-91-006, leaving the condition for underground utilities in place. Motion was seconded by Mr. Glasscock and k unanimously carried (5-0). B, Consider the preliminary replat of the Denton North Addition from unit 1 to lots 1-E and 1-W, Block 1, staff report: Mr. Yost stated that approximately 2500 square feet of right-of-way will be dedicated along Hwy. 77, Public improvements include 734 feet of concrete sidewalk, plus 51 feet of water line servicing a fire hydrant on Got 1-E, The replat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. THe Development Review Committee recommends that P&Z recommend approval. i Motion was made by Mr, Glasscock, seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht, and unanimously carried (5-0) to recommend approval of the preliminary replat of the Denton North f Addition, IN+^'rxa`kj f t g:wpdoa9V69147o SEF i 1 i ;I ORDINANCE NO. - I' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING THE DETAILED PLAN APPROVED BY ORDINANCE NO. 86-121 FOR A PORTION OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 8, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF U - S. HIGHWAY 77 AND FALLMEADOW STREET) PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF) AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 86-121, the City Council approved a detailed plan for 2.8 acres of land located in the northeast corner of U.S. Highway 77 and Fallmeadow street, as described therein; and ; WHEREAS, the owner has applied for 'approval of a revised de- tailed plan for that land) and ? WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended"ap- proval of the amended detailed plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS; i SECTION -J.. That Exhibit A of Ordinance No. 86-121, the de- tailed plan for the 2.8 acres of the district described therein is amended by the adoption of the revised detailed plan, attached to ` and incorporated into this ordinance by reference. SECTION II. That Section II of Ordinance No. 86-121 is amended to read as follows: age9j On II. That the 2.8 acres of land herein described shall be developed and used in accordance with the de- tailed plan approved, subject to the following condi- tions- 1. Sidewalks meeting city standards shall be constructed along Fallmeadow Street and U. S. Highway 77. 2. All electric distribution lines shall be located underground in accordance with City specifications. SECTIg N III, That a copy of this ordinance shall be attached to ordinance go, 86-121, showing the amendments made. CZLQN IV. That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $2000.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. t F t ff 1 SECTION V, That this ordinance shall become effective { fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City 4 Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance : to be published twine in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the city of Denton, Texas, withih ten (10) days of the date of its passage. , 1941. 1 PASSED AND APPROVED this the day Of kk` ; i I , E BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR I ATTESTt aENNYFER WALTER.S, CITY SECRETARY ff , BY: i APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM. DEBRA A. DRAYOVYTCH, CITY ATTORNEY I l Page 2 i ras+hvc FF~~ Y Exhibit A Plan for Denton North Addition consistin, Development oft 1 (i page)t , Relationsh'.p to Comprehensive Plan s ` nd 2, Table of r2rmitted Uses (i page); a 3. Site plan t l t.'k,'AYICJ i j PROPOSED NEW DISTRICT'S RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY OF DENTON'S COKPREHENSIVE PLAN t The proposed new planned development district should be considered t as a neighborhood service project. This type of project would relate well with the adjacent low intensity neighborhood district by providing selected goods and services such as gasoline, groceries, assorted small retail businesses, office space, dry i- y cleaning services, eta. r Landscaping has been designed so as to allow for the smoothest possible visual transition between the project and the adjacent j districts. Traffic contro?, has been designed so as to allow for the best combination of safety and east of use in and around the project. f Signage will be controlled so as to be both aesthetically pleasing i and to retain ,a certain continuity throughout the project. i In short, the proposed new planned development district will be a low-ispact addition providing needed services to the surrounding low-intensity neighborhoods. f t t j 1 I l f L rr.<xe:a t i}13Yi4f -All I~ r TABLE OF PERMITTED D$$g ie s My establishment wherein the primary occupation is the sale or rental of merchandise or goods in small thbro e kin lots or parcels, not in bulk, for use or s consumption b In y mmediate purchaser. For the purpose of this ordinance, however, retail sales establishments shall not be deemed to include mortuary or funeral parlor stores, used furniture or rummage sale, animal inic orbhospital -han with outside runs or pens. Perfiostal GerviQe R.t.w, , r primary occupation is the repair, carsblof, hment ma wherein the customizing of personal maintenance or j the person or are a physical compone that are t of the n or carried about purpose of this ordinance p~rson• For the include but need not be limited to barber hope beaut Dahl s shall ar pat grooving establishments, laundering, cleaning and otha r goral servicing establishments, tailors, dressmaking shops, shoe cleaning or repair shops, and other similar places of business. Eating Establishments Video Rental Store Safe Deposit Boxes Professional Offices medical offices Health Studios Laundromat„ small Appliance Repair shops Dry Cleaners Bookstore Gasoline services Travel agency off-Prnmise Sale of Beer And/or Wine on-Premise Sale of Beer and/or Wine f •••Y rC'rl - -a 1.16'+"•J U4~ 1-1F• IOi ya i..•eu..r r•iYwl ~Yw i 44M .ice .v?.•/: 6^• •~twum --`-~-'i «s•r.4a:wK< ~r M I t 4' t • L. ~4•l ~S'•s R ~ a.1j t{ ` ` •~►w j i I ~Y`r5`+^r `j:r'eCt 3'..lf , ~ irks \ i. - ~ K . ~4{A~ T• ~ • ' L f f''+etsiF . ~ ~ e • ~ T.'t a~ b Y'R.`~ ~ f~ t.-.- 4 - 'fw.r. ~e~ +`-0\ ti~iil~}}7766FF',, ~ •:.r t~a:e , - 2y~'- t a! AMe,•,U,l,rt J-,!{»!'• a a 4i H J \ y F , I 1 --Y Y'L Y lydo t• `yy.~ •"••1f'r♦ ~q :`K.jl,~fW IF'h OL am OETAri. iIT'6 Mall l.Y,rs.-A~ ,+a ! 1 •"'~J~- NNpsQAFE PRO.IEOT,INFOI ~vw ,er. ~otY4+ ow flit lMp-gon ad. 64V 41 t.,on OW /Mrtlf.>Y~. N.+ae er. a•• 1 owl t PLANT UST ..'",IYxt ew.+ Rafstf+wO tr+ do r.) w sva:..W wt rafwLr+[rr Gov) I V f.stW 1 wt•e .rt: area yr,11.. e'+e aµ > +w.- a4 ',At'Vi!rt+/~e4:IY4T'~tG)1 t'+t+w• ,ARWAJ HY:Y~n lya*a+ral['M~) I >Nw. b4 fr.NrYwf^4M1 I►IW'l,i+s., , ~ tw. d•VN.MM) r r E p„r .d•V YTr ;•ht►ad V•'AFI µ„.i Y+ilf) .tye yiJR. .'e•. 46A aw-F 411NhV sl,c,t.'. 60oo~+ .S fty.S+y,MI dfrfEe ~jy04•Iar,`: MaMAM PLANT UBT rtoe•f a.~.el t4 VAC fN' .Rl arJ6 •i~ T4•M , , tr- i Rl:w, v Ynvt f.'.A:4.1=t, 1!!1 Y.GI a~ 1 M Wt.. Ii ' w 'M" t{• t tl Ia4 . 1444441 , 4'. tY 1 4't!~`N~ . b >4Y O Yy.. YL.- 'J'l:e..1.T~NJt,fl LY4 fl. It!'It~~'{WO~N'+~i4VMb) yYrA afi`', •.r' _ w. - etKRaIRDI :AYi Y• I p~_ ~-E vl, ' r suu pry IlL A" •R m'R,'1. 4aL4C fMi yp et YIMf~ Ir,ptr~ i 44 rifer 1 WY,t9 R•Frl . a+ + 1 ` lAFiM R K KPA~~ d~1 MOfL'/T~/M•q 1►E'M'lMC 4,'NObyfCl~/e . Ael~e~r _ dlMitY+fA NNW 1 'y 64 iw" 4 DATE: -07/16/91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT . r ~r TO.' Mayor and Members of the city council FROMt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Z-91-004 RECOMMENDATIONt 1 Planning and zoning commission recommend approval with conditions t 5-0. s G SUMMARY: t Rezone a 245.8 sore tract of land from Agricultural district to Planned Development for the purpose of a mixed use development y consisting of office, retail, commetoial, manufacturing and i institutional uses, and amend the Denton Development Plan Concept i Map by enlarging the northwest urban center. BACKGROUNDt See Planning and Zoning Commission Report. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS APFECTEDS 77 Neighborhood, Planning and Development Department, citizens of i 1 Denton.' tt i ' FISCAL I_MPACTt N/A , Yap lly sub t d:Prepared bys Harrell city Manager s K ren K. F shari Urban Planner i App dr obbina, AICP Executive Director Planning and Developmenk 2724x i F it rya. • n t Ezmav ell V'~M PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Case No.: Z-91-004 Meeting Date; 07/16/91 ti GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant/: Rancho Vista Development Company . Owner Subsidiary of Hunt Petroleum Corp. 5000 Thanksgiving Tower Dallas, TX 75201 (Donald D. Dillard) Requested Actions: Request approval of amending the intensity area of the Denton Development Plan from low intensity to the urban center on 76.37 acres. Rezone 245.8 acres from the Agricultural it District to Planned Development District and i approve a development ;plan for the purpose of a mixed use development consisting of i office, retail, commereiai., manufacturing, and institutional uses. { Location and Size: 245.8 acres located in the northeast and :t southeast quadrants of I-35 and Loop 288 (under construction) in northwest Denton. t Surrounding Land Use and Zonings 3 North - "C" commercial - truck stop. South - PD 113 - office, cluster housing and single-family lots (vacant) East - PD 115 - retail, multi-family, single-.family lots (Va::ant) West "LI" light industrial - vacant; Camping World Denton DevelopmenC Plan: I 1:5.85 acres Urban CQnter (60% of site) I 9r.90 acres Low intensity area {404 of site) 3 yQ'Lq iary 2H.A. • . ~f}Ly;97 (Case Z-91-004) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION j Transportationt t z f. The development is located at the intersection of IH-35 and transportation arteries. Loop 2880 two of Denton's major These roads combined with the proposed internal transportation infrastructure can adequately serve the + MMM development based on 5,300,000 square feet of their proposed land uses. i The developer will be required to do intensive coordination with the City and State Highway Department with regards to areas such as access ramps, expanding roadways (Highway 77,1, and frontage roads. The frontage roe°xda proposed along Loop 288 are critical to protect Loop 298 as a future transportation artery. involving rairp5 a,, 'or connections to the main lanes of Loop 288 are key al4~11,errts to the design and operating characterlst.',cs of knls development, The TIA discusses the j connection he pair, lanes to Loop 288 as a lath alternat:iae co ;oavinii temporary access to this development in the begir;ning nhasr The City and developer have agreed t to cooperat,~ to e6Labli sY, a program that will benefit this development: and the r,,ni..~ eo region. ' , The coc.nection of .his revelopment to Bonnie Brae to provide access to nor.t•nw-?~,t Denton is a key design element that I should be correctly staged to limit impacts on the existing Westgate neighborhood. Again, this issue_ will involve cooperation with the City and this developer and the adjoining property owr°ers. The developers will be required to fund signalization and turning lanes at the intersections to provide safe passage and adequate capacities at the time traffic generations from the development meet warrants (according to The Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices and The Highway Capac ty Manual The interchange of Loop 288 and I-35 should be completed by 19924 s l ~ , B~'.lit1'A-f J (Case Z-91-004) Page Three SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued) : j Access to Tract II-A may be difficult for northbound I-35 ? traffic due to the State Highway Department's design of this interchange; however, access is achievable. The Transportation Plan as reflected in the applicant's r' submittal dated "Revised May 7, 1991" is shown on page 301 j k; map 6-1. The road running norLh and south tying to U.S. Highway 77 is within an odd shaped land area. It should be accessible to adjoining property to avoid other intersections on q,S. Highway 77 or unnecessary drive approaches. It should also enter Highway 77 at a 90 degree angle, ideally. Staff recommended that conditions requiring coordinated ' 3 pedestrian circulation systems be inc1ud ed with detailed ~ plans and that any pedestrian circulation system in place I adjacent to this development be tied into at the time of the I Detailed plans and platting. P&z concurred and the applicant has added this condition to the proposal. Interior roads should be used for driveway access as much as possible. Driveways on Loop 288 service road and I-35 will be limited. Utilities: General A 20' utility easement will be required along all state and Federal highways Water a. Proposed water line which runs along the south side of Loop 288 shall be labeled 20* minimum diameter, b. All other lines' shown on developmental plan are 12" minimum line size. c. Currently all of this property is on the upper pressure plain which is fed from the booster station at McKenna Park, The area is currently deficient for fireflows. At the time of platting the Developer will be responsible for providing facilities to generate adequate fire protection. d. The proposed 12" minimum diameter water line which runs j along I-35 south of Road "E" must connect to the 12• line f1 which runs along Payne Drive. j 4 + {i -I f i •n a (Case Z-91-004) Page Four SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued) Sanitary Sewer i a. Proposed lift station shown on tract II C must be located r% off site to the east in order to service area to the intersection of U.S. Highway 77 and Loop 288, Developer ii will be able to collect pro-rata on the lift station_ and 4' offsite portion of the line work, if oversized stations are i built by the developer, b. At the time of platting, the city shall investigate the g feasibility of eliminating the Barrow lift station. The developer may be required to provide off-site extension to j the intersection of University and Bonnie Brae. i Electricity: Staff has mentioned to the applicant the idea of burying electrical utilities. This option costs about twice the i 1 overhead systems. Staff is not in a position to recommend f this as a condition because feasibility studies have not been completed. j Drainage: This development will create the need for drainage 1 Improvements. Off-site drainage concerns may be addressed with off-site improvements or on-site retention, Detention ! solutions should not consist of small individual basins but should he for large areas (ie, regional ponds). There is of particular concern with drainage to the south and to the north near U,s. 77, The approximate location of detention areas are shown on the Development Plan. Their exact location,` area,' and capacities should be defined at the detailed' plan and platting phases. other drainage areas may require off-site improvements to be determined at the detailed plan stage. _I The Westgate neighborhood has requested the southern pond be designed as a retention facility. f t ME ME[ r e~1kYiv~ (Case 2-91-004) Page Five i HISTORY No history exists on this particular site) however,. Planned Development 113 and Planned Development 115, which are adjacent to this site, may provide some background, Both Planned 1 Developments 113 and 115 were approved with quite a bit of time l and compromise, The main concerns of the governing bodies were t! too intense uses on property in low intensity areas. As approved, Planned Development 113 is comprised of offices along " I-35, clustered housing, and single family lots, Planned Development 115 consists of general retail, office, s' multi-family, single family and a public park. Both of these j, PD's have single family lots adjoining the Westgate neighborhood. On May 13, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a i workshop to discuss this upcoming zoning request, ! Thu following issues were noted at that time: r ; 1. Plan amendment appeared in order. Extension of the urban center to the south, with appropriate design controls and effective neighborhood protection appeared appropriate. 2. Maintain and use industrial performance standards for this district. ; 3. Compatibility, "the edge" at the Westgate neighborhood. o concern for noise and lights. I 1 o "Meaningful buffering". o Concern for the view of the backs of buildings, j 40 Infrastructure analysis, o Conduct a Traffic Impact Analysis and drainage studies to 1 determine off-site improvements, o "Access to be a major consideration". o Retention may not be desirable if it attracts mosquitos, o Provide bike and pedestrian access where appropriate, 5. Notification at detailed plan stage, 4 P GtYa'R1'? ntirt~A IvF.v r, (case z-91-004) Page Six ANALYSIS r GENERAL INFORMAN this eot, 60% of this in the northern lnrbanf center rand r408 of the site 1 As noted unated site is loc has submi is located in a low intensity area. The plintensitY areasttbe { a letter o£ justification requesting the changed to extend the urban center south of Westgate Drive to the southern property boundary. (See attached letter of j; justification and map.) 4 According to the Denton DevelopmentlocPlanr ated urban centers e e tthe he largest centers strategically to rag contersoffice, concentration of commercial~heseretail, are intendedrltotserve and multi -family housing. as the hub for economic activity and employment, According to the Plan, the northern urban center should be approximately equal TV size to the southern center by the year 2010. s.. The purpose of designating these urban centers is to provide a i policy commitment to a specific location in order to; 1. Ensure a commitment to the business community that f will be supported by City aas commitment to other residents ! goveactrivitienmens t while these making g that their neighborhood and local streets and facilities will not be disrupted by an unplanned major activity center in their neighborhood. Westgate Addition, loc isd along eaytaoblritsheion d of the neighborhood od property boundary, consisting of one (1) acre lots. The applicant is i proposing the area adjacent to this neighborhood (Trade E 1F) be office use with a maximum FohkR. of •j0" applicant believes that one story office use next to this neighborhood provides a transition to the more, intense uses in the existing and proposed urban center areas. ~ 2, Ensure that adequate public infrastructure to support these centers is available. Major roads, utilities and other public expenditures should b capital b ilt and ncouraged improvement programs in this area either through or private funding. As noted in the SPECIAL INNORMhTION section of this report, the proposed utilities and road maps are acceptable. (Case Z-91-004) Page Seven ANALYSIS (Continued) j 3. Ensure that the long--range plan achieves balanced growth within the City. I The request to increase the boundaries of the urban center ; would not have a negative impact to the health, welfare, - { and safety of the community. This zoning in the northern urban center is consistent with the balanced Vrowth 1 policies of the Plan. According to the Denton Development Plan, low density f residential areas on the fringe of these urban centers should be protected by such measures as intensity gradation, strict site design requirements, transportation planning and land use balance and landscaping, should ensure that no local residential streets are utilized for 1 general circulation to the centers. Development of neighborhood associations and councils are encouraged to further ensure neighborhood protection. Two (2) neighborhood meetings have been sponsored and conducted by the applicant. According to the applicant, some of the ; neighborhoods requested staff not attend these meetings. Their 1 issues are provided through the developer. Neighborhood j concerns may be known through reply forms and/or public hearings. The applicant has submitted a letter to Frank Robbins outlining the outcomings of these meetings. (Attachment 6). Tract IF and part of Tract IC and Tract IS are proposed as a "transition area" consisting of one story office buildings with a floor-to-area ratio of 0.3 to 1 and height and uce i limitations, See "Transition Plan". Calculations reveal that with 23.53 acres of land with a 0.3 FAR, that 307,490 square feet of office use would be allowed. In a low intensity area, the trips generated by this use would not be in accordance with the general policy of proportionate share intensity allocation. Low intensity areas are allocated 60 trips per acre (23.53 X 60 ° 1,411.8 trips). Based on the maximum allowed square footage of office on this site, 4612.35 trips would be generated (307,490 square feet divided by 1,000 X 15). There are 3,200,55 trips in excess of what is allowed. The 99.9 acre area of low intensity is in a study area now at 1348 allocation, The effect of the zoning would be to make this a disproportionate share allocation. I f ' I 1 i r;9 a=:~ t (Case Z-91-004) Page Eight ANALYSIS (Continued) In analyzing the area designated as In area", the policies of a low intensity area are applied. 1. Strict site plan control, r; " This policy will be followed, as analysis in great detail may occur at the time of detailed plan review. 2. Traffic on residential streets. This plan shows the general layout for the road system. The j, design shows sensitivity to the residential areas and is intended to keep traffic out of those areas. i` j 3, Density/intensity standard. As discussed earlier in the report, intensity policy is violated and a plan amendment is proposed, accordingly. 4, Greenspace, recreation facilities and parks. ; None of the above has been proposed with the exception of the retention/detention ponds located in the northern and southern portions of this site. The City policy concerning park dedication is geared towards residential uses and is implemented on a voluntary basis. 5. Neighborhood input. The applicant has conducted two (is neighborhood meetings. It appears as though, the applicant working well with this group in order tc alley their concerns. The "Table of Perm;.tted Uses" as submitted, as well as the "Applicable Development Standards" table for each use is formatted in a "user friendly" manner and is generally acceptable to staff. and Many of the staff's concerns we he resolved thh sPl nni g the made Zoning Commission meeting. application to reflect the appropriate charges to their app Commissioners. Some recommendation of the Planning and Zoning I of the main issues were as follows: Issue 1. Intensity Boundary Modifications In the original application, the developer had requested to not only to extend the urban center to the south but also to amend the DDP Concept Map to allow for a moderate activity center between the proposed urban center and the property boundary of the Westgate Addition. tt}it%jEi"ir t (Case Z•-91-004) Page Nine ANALXSIS (Continued) the % Staff agreed that a Plan amendment was appropriate f°r5taff area shown as an extension of the unbar, uenter• s suggested that the corridor the mitigation of the strip concepcommerciale Took °papp'ropriate PD detaied plan) and (b) effeive design ana ddbuf£ers to ensurelcompatibility with landCuses transition "on the edge" of the corridor. Staff did not agree with Tract 1F being in Brea modified to asmodderate activity center, but rather, remain low es intensity area in order to assure the neighbe orinne properties of protection and preservation. During 12r 1991 meeting, the developer agreed to leave this land in a low intensity area. Issue 2. Compatibilit with exiI:: and lanned/zoned low intensity uses on "•he east and south in of the proyosed develo meat. 1 It was evident at the public hearing that there was a neighborhood consensus agreeing to the development plan and the f l techniques used to create compatible has greed to djavcenect a brick Westgate neighborhood. The applicant wall, six (6) feet in height along the Westgate Addition property boundary, Issue 3. Alternative edestri.an access condition. The applicant has agreed to provide alternative existing pedestrian access plans to coordinate with any o erties_at the time r p adjacent properties circulation systems in place on of the detailed plan stage. i Issuo 4. 1-35 Setback Staff had recommended that the proposed 40 foot setback along 1-35 be restricted to utility easements and landscaped aroa. The Planning and Zoning Commission i is allow approval of this as proposed by Qne developer, which of the 40 foot setback. s j i i t A14a~:nay,~ ' rY- r IIFryITyy i r IFS (Case z-91-004) page Ten } a RECOMMENDATION ' p` fanning and zoning Commission recommends approval (5-0) of the zoning application and the amendment to the Concept Map (intensity area amendment). ' y ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition Approve petition with additional conditions 3. Table the request 4, postpone consideration to a public hearing at a date certain 5. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS f 't 5 1, Submitted Booklet dated May 7, 1991. 2. Letter of Justification for Plan Amendment with attached , map. 3, Traffic Impact Analysis ! 4, Letter to Frank Robbins from the applicant regarding the i neighborhood meetings. 1 5, "Exhibit B" as submitted by the applicant outlining their request of approval. 60 Minutes of P&Z, June 12, 1991. r F i 1 ; ! ! 3424k f 11100 i t f ATTACHMENT 1 t ~yy I' PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING PROPOSAL FOR HII.L.aWr CENTER (245.8 Acres) t DENTON, TEXAS f 4 J 9 f ,f 1 r` SrwIM ry: q,.ew vl~a we co.wiY $000 Tiuwkeops To~ i "IN16 Tyxu 75201 i April 1991 Rwls" Moy 79 1"1 r c E RANCHO VISTA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 31100 THANKSGr0NG TOWER DALLAS. TEXAS 75201 May 7, 1991 t j Mr. Frank H. Robbins Executive Director for Planning i i and Development City of Denton, Texas 215 East McKinney l Denton, Texas 76201 i , Dear Mr, Robbins: Rancho Visa Development Company is pleased to submit this revised Planned Development ? Zoning Proposal for HILLCREST CENTER (approximately 245,! acres of land which R owns on the north side of Denton). The land, which is in the Denton city limits, is located along and Jtat east of IH-35 in the vicinity of the intersections of 1H-35 and US-77 as well as 1H- 35 and Loop 28C It is our Intent to secure zoning which will permit the marketing of HILLCREST CENTER for a mixture of business uses, In this regard, we are requesting a change from Agricultural (A) to Planned Development (PD) Zoning district and approval of I Concept/Development Plans on the 245.6 acres. s We real the tonins proposal is consistent with the 1938 Denton Development Plan, guidelines, reflects a pbm of logical land use patterns with sensitivity to neighborhood protection, and E allows Deatoa to capture the emerging economic benefits of the 1K-3S Corridor, The Denton ~ I Developn*m Plan describes this area as a future "Urban Center" which should be developed in such a manner as... i 'O ENCOURAGE THE CONCENTRATION OF COMMERCIAL, RETAIL, f OFFICE, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, AND HOUSING..," which will create "...A HUB OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY AND EMPLOYMENT" j O u r de veiopn►ent objectives are consistent with these Denton Development Plan Urban Center "ideas" and "concepts" The approval of this zoning proposal by the City of Denton will allow us to initiate marketing activity for development of this property, We feel the development activities envisioned for HILLCRESTC!NTEP, will certainly contribute, in a very quality manner, to the economic l base or Denton. If yotl need toy further information in regard to this application, please let me know, Sincerely, RANCHO VISTA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Donald D, Dillard i Vice President td 2 Attachment i t h4raY Ii I NiLLCREST CENSER ZONING APPLICATION OUTLINE i ' I. LETTER OF INTENT Z. ZONING APPLICATION OUTLINE 3. LOCATION R 3 Narrative Denton Area Map 4. BOUNDARY /OWNERSHIP 4 9 Narrative Map (Survey) Field Notes S. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS Existing Roads , Existing Lead Uies on Site Existing Adl10001 Land Use / Zoniag Existing Water Service Existing Sewer swift 4 Slopes. Topogs pby & ?kuceEe Existing Electric and Go Service i Development Cowlderatione b, pROPOSED CONarT PLAN / DEVUOPMI T PLAN 1 Concept of Lend Use Activities Relation to Denton Developseeat ma Transportation ; Pedeetriae AWW and Circuiasiam 1Jtilltia / Dninagt Permitted Us" Arehiti Re~gulaticas / Standatcl Dweloptaent ]ateasitr j Special Provisions i j . ~r 3 r II i , i f t 1 l 4 FtltW i .A6Y" I i L•OCATIONI This property is 245,8 acres in northwest Denton located along and ad;aceat to the east side of iH-35 from a point 4,000 feet south of new Loop 288, north to U5-77. It includes undeveloped land along both sides of Loop 288 between IH-35 and the interchange with us- 77. The property has a total of 5,560 feet of frontage on IN-15 and 3,600 feet of frontage on ! Loop 288 along with frontage on US-77, All of the property has been in the IIMlts of the City of Denton for a number of years and is shown in red on the following area map. i E wrsw r w Le" 266 !U15, P 73H I 1 ~ t ! 3 ■ HI=REST CENTER Dertten, Tear W"M00"MI POP 4 i x ,.gin BOUNDARY AND bWNER~HIP The 245.8 acres (owned by Rancho Vista Development CompanY) is divided Into two (2) tracts by Loop 288 as shown on the Boundary Map. Tract I (located south of Loop 288) contains approximately 166.913 acres. Tract 11 (located north of Loop 288) contains 78.865 acres. mates and are Complete Included Boundary Map (Map 4 ~I )nissl eludred aons the end of this section. following descriptions. A I Tract I. Parcel L All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the Nathan Wade Survey, Abstract Number l 1407, City of Denton, County of Denton, State of Texas; said tract being described In Exhibit "A" as shown by deed to J A L Partners (Partners), dated 01 July 1988, and recorded in ' Yolume 2405 Page 769 of the Real Property Records of the County of Denton, State of Texas, { and being more fully described as follows: tit BEGINNING for the southeast corner of the tract being desedbed heroin at a set 1-inch steel 1 square tubing in Westgate Street (an asphalt surfaced public road) at the southeut corner of i said Partners tract, said tubing being the northeast corner of a 96.385-acre tract as shown by } 111 deed to J 8r. L Pumam, dated 01 July 1988, and recorded in Volume 2405 Page 748 of said . Real Property Records, and In the west line of a treat shown by deed to Joseph J. Tallal, Trustee, and recorded In Volume 1513 Page 906 of sold Deed Records: " THENCE South 89058'46" West, with the south line of sold Partners tract, and with the north ; line of said 96.385-acre tract, a distance tai 2,190.34 feet to a set J-Inch robot in the southerly , right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 35; THENCE North 46655'20' West, with the right-of-way of Interstate Highway 3S, a distance of 100.9 feet to a concrete right-of-way monument; i THENCE North 03141129' Wast, with the east line of Wd Interstate Highway 3S, adistanee of 421.52 feet to a found 1-inch robot to the southerly right-of-way line of Loop 289, (under construction); THENCE with the southerly right-of-way tine of Loop 288, the following six (6) courses add distances: I. North 13'10'46' East, a distance of 14008 fast; 2. North 01'13'26" West, a distance of 440.46 feet; 31 North 3661711' Ean a distance of 91.81 feet; 4. North 88149'28" East, a distance of 525.03 feet; S. North 78'38'23' East, a distance of 721.44 feet to the beginnlag of a curve to the left whose radius Is 5,8409 feet; 6. With saki curve, an arc length of 1,371.73 feet, central angle of 1317'19" (chord North 794361260 East; a distance of 1,370.58 feet) to a found J-Inch robot for the northeast corner of the aforesald Tallai tract; THENCE: South 00407'53" West, with the east line of sold tract, a dismtee of 661.28 feet to a fence corner post; t 5 i i !9 L' t a t i ' THENCE South 89.16'38" West, with a fence, a distance of 373.60 feet to a fence corner post, said post being the northwest corner of the aforesaid Tallal tract; THENCE South 00'35134" East, a distance of 873.70 feet to the POINT OF BEOINNINO and containing 70.533 acres of land. Tract L Parcel Z ti All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the Nathan Wade Survey, Abstract Number 1407, City of Denton, County of Denton. State of Texas; said tract being shown by deed to ' 1 dt L Partners, dated 01 July 1988, and recorded in Volume 2405 Page 748 of the Raab 1 Property Records of the County of Denton, State of Texas, and being more fully described f as follows; BEOINNINa for the northemoorner of the tract being described hereto m a set f-inch steel square tubing, and tubing being the northeast corner of said Partners tract, and at the ' southeast corner of a 70,533-acre tract as shown by deed to 1 dr L Partners, dated 01 July j 1985, and recorded in Volume 2405 Page 769 of said Real Property Records, and In the west E line of a tract shown by Deed to Joseph J. Tallal, Trustee, and recorded in Volume 1513 Pye i 906 of said Deed Records; THENCE South 007S14' East, with Tatiai's west line, a distance of 229.3 feet to a set i-inch r steel square tubing for an all corner of said Partners tract; THENCE South 89'05'38' West, a distance of 625,22 feet to a chain-Ilnk fetus cornet post at the most northerly northweet corner of the Westgate. Park First Addition, recorded is Volume 04 Page 12 of the Pbt.Racords of Denton County, Texas; THENCE South 0110313N West, with the west line of said Westgate Park, a distance of 215.00 feet to a found i-inch raber a the southwest corner of Block A, Westgate Park Addition; THENCE South 89'19'53' Walt, a dlstam of 57.45 feet to a found f-inch rebar at the northwest corner of Barrow Drive (ace atpha(t surfaced public road?; THENCE South 01014112• Eat, with the west line of told Watgpea Park, a distance of 1,983,81 feet to a found i-hash rebar at the southwest corner of Fledges Drive (ant asphalt surfaced public roed>; THENCE North 8911109' East, with the south line of Fladger Drive, a distance of 21.13 feet to a found }-inch rebar at the oonhwest corner of Block C Westgate Park Addition; THENCE South 00'16'33' Eea, with the wait line of Bald Block C. a diouso , ot, 200,87 feet to a found i-inch rebar at the southwest corner of said Block C, and the southeast corner of said Partners tract, said rebar ciao being in the north line of the F, Batson Survey, Abstract Number 43, and the south lire of said Wade Survey; THENCE South 89'51'38" gent, with the north line of sold Batson Survey, the south line of said Wade Survey, and the moth line of said Partners tract, a distance of 1,488,14 feet to a concrete right-of-way monument in the east right-of-way line of lntentate Highway 35; 6 i i a ~ ,~M n..gf i3'' ttl~.lt 1 (..1i~k:ltf THENCE with the east right-of-way in Intestate Highway 33 the following five (5) courses and distances; 1. North 04016'51" East, a distance of 72,83 feet; 2. North 03.46'06' West, a distance of 1,200,0 feet; 3. North 03139'15" West, a distance of 100,38 feet; 4. North 03°46'06" West, a distance of 1,184.87 feed 5. North 43606'20" East, a distance of 123,05 feet to a set }-inch steel square tubing in Payne Drive; ; THENCE North 89.58'46" East, with the north line of said Partners tract, and south line of said 10.533-acre tract, a distance of 2,190.34 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and l ' f containing 96.38 acres of land. , t i E Tract ►t 1 i All that certain tract or parcel land situated in the Alexander White Survey, Abstract Number 1446 and the Nathan Weds Survey, Abstract Number 1407, City of Denton, County of Denton, State of Texan said tract being described in Exhiblt "8` as shown by deed to J A L Partners, dated 01 July 1988, and recorded in Volume 2403 Pap 769 of the Red Property Records of the County of Denton, State of Taxes, and being more fully described as follows; BEGINNING for the northeast corner of the tract being described herein at a found }-inch rebar on the south line of US Highway number 77 (an asphalt surfaced public road), said' rebar being the northeast corner of said Partners tract; t THENCE South 00'08'41" West, with the east Ilse of said Partners tract, a distance of 739.07 i feet to a found'}-Inch rebar in the north right-of-way live of Loop 288 (undo: contuuotlonr i Thence with the north right-cf-way tine of Loop 298 the following six (6) courses and distances; I . South 73.43'00" West, a distance of 716.46 feet to the beginaiag of a curve to the i right whose radius Is 5,609,69 fear, central sake of 06459'4r, 2. With said curve, an are length of 685,03 feet (chord South 82131'43" West, a distance of 684.60 feet; 3. North 84022'33" Wes4 a distance of 394,09 fast; 4. North 73139'01" West, a distmwe of 361,86 fat: S. South 89.5418' West. a distance of $20.14 test; 6. North 4414143" West a distance of 141,74 feet to a found i-taoh rebar In the out right-of-way of Intestate Highway 35; THENCE North 03043104' West, with the east line of said Intsrsrtw, a distance of 1,441,00 feet to a wooded right-of-way monument at the southwest corner of a tract shown by deed to Union Ail of California, sad Recorded in Volume 602 Page 4$ of said deed records; THENCE South 89.33133" East, with the south line of said Union Oil tract, a distance of 1,022,90 feet to a fence corner post at its southeast corner THENCE North 00'22123" Wost, with a fence on the an line of said Union Oil tract, a distance of 446.03 feet to a found f-Inch rebar In the south line of said Highway 77; i i FJNmaPUUMIw.IiWM^ 7 f f THENCE South 59'07' 11" East, with the south line of said Highway 77, a distance of 115.73 feet to a found i-Inoh rebar la the west line of a treat shown by deed to John Porter, and recorded In Volume 958 Page 925 of said deed records; THENCE South 00014136" East, with a fence on Porters' west line, a distance of 939.41 feet to a found 1-Inch rebar at the southwest corner of said Porter tract; THENCE South 89.44116" East, with a fence on Porter's south line, a distance of 1,316,47 feet 1 to a fence corner post at Porter's southeast corner, THENCE North 00037'26" East, with a fence, a distance of 154.65 feet to a found i-inch { rebar in the south line of said Highway 77; THENCE South $"7'11" East, with said right-of-way line, it disUuwo of 446.44 feet to the ~ - POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 75.863 acres of land i t i ~kk h4 8 k i I t Pik] ynr 1 rti~.*r,ktr 1 r .sxaha~: Ybp r4lV i TOW I ; . a.L rMlq AWN 1r~r M tip' qq i 44 Map 4-! 1 ►w.~.aN~sr ctttrWe a....w' BOUNDARY M N7~1&b ' i " t . EXISTING SLIE 'CONDITION This property is undeveloped, having been used for farming and mnohing operations up to this point, it continues, even today, to be used for agricultural uses, . ExIttint Roads 3 ti As shown on the Existing Roads Map (Map 5-1), Tract I is bounded on the west by IN-35, " and on the north by Loop 291, Loop 288 Is currently under construction with anticipated completion in 1992. IH-35 provides a high level of visual and traffic accessibility, offering non-stop traffic flow between Mexico and Mianesota. Within the tract, a two-lane rursi-type roadway exists to connect Westgate to the northbound frontal* road of W-35. G Tract If Is bounded on the west by 1-35, on the south by now Loop 2910 and on the north, It I touches US-77 at two locations. Them are no existing roads on-site, EAlstint Land User j All of the property rerttafns in active agriaultunl use. F.xistinn Adiacent nd has tit 2r.W The existing adjacent land uses and soaLtg are shown on the Adjmttt Land Use and Adjacent Zoning Maps (Maps S-2 and 3-3). The existing adjacent laud uses arx j • A residential subdivision ant of ad adJa au t to Tract I. Campiag World - a new facility dimity acrces IH-35 from Tract I sad south of Loop 2811, a Union 76 truck stop at the sortbast corner of US 77 at IM-35, adjacent to Tract II. • Truck stop and commercial retail center west of 19-35 near the north end of Tract !L All other adjacent land is devoted to agricultural uses for peaturiag 11vestock and producing crops. Current toning on adjacent property cau be described by reference to three (3) PQ's and three (3) zoning districts as shown on the Adjacent Zoning Map (Map S-3). These are dacribed as follows • Westgate Neighborhood - The existing single-fantlly neighborhood in►nsedlately east of Tract l is zoned SF-16, and aontaias approximately 35 acres. The maximum allowable building height in this area Is 21 stories. North of Tract 11, the Union 76 truck stop is tcmtsd on land zoned C- Commercial. C-CommercW soiling exists oil all land (within City limits) across US-77 from the Union 76 hook two to the north of Tract lI and also *a the west side of IH-35 at U5-77. aa.~,arroarnsieww 10 I i IVA , t x .[six 4e~t i • West of IH-35, where Camping World is located, the property is zoned L1-Light Industrial. This Ll zoning exteOs on the west side of IM-35 south to US-380. • PO-110 - A 25.6-acre Planned Development for office, commercial, and retail uses on two tracts adjacent to Loop 288 at US-77, Approved in 1986, this PD permits it maximum of 1.0 million SF of development, five (5) stories high, and 50 percent coverage, No development activity has occurred. PD-113 - Located south of and adjacent to Tract 1, this 74,97-acre PD permits 16.75 acres of two-story office, 4,0 acres of neighborhood service retail, 18,34 acres of cluster housing, 27,74 acres of SF- 10 single-faatily housing, 6.0 acres of ; SF-16 single-family housing, and 2.17 acres for detention of storm drainage. Approved In 1986, no development has occurred within this PD. • PD-115 - This 239,17-acre PD is located out of the Westgate neighborhood and i I south of PD-110, extending out to 8onnis Bate. It permits that following use:: i , • 41.93 acres General retail, sclendfio and research laboratories, i engine/motor repair, wholoook office, and sample I room uses • 44.94 acres Office j • 11,34 sores MF-I • 21.85 acres MF-R • 38.97 acres SF-7 i • 23.41 acres SF-10 l • 19.31 acres SF-16 • 23.42 acm Zero lot line SF homes • 14.00 acres Public pull Again, no development has occurred sin% the PD's approval in 1986, 3I Water Service 1 The property Is within the City of Demon's service Jurisdiction for water, and water servioe i is available on the proporty, as shown on Map S-4, Existing water/Sewer. ProtMady, a 6-inch (8-inch in some plum) water line exists In a north-south alignment Mont the east sWO of 'Grant I, and through Tract IL A 12-Inch line exists about 1,700 feat south of Tract L Developtoeot of de property will require phase ousnsion of warm Haan to and through the property. E Sanitary Saw" The truth stop; north of the property are now sewed by City of Denton sanitary sewer, A system of liftsatloru, 8-inch fora nits, and 10-inch gravity tines It kxatsd to an easement parallel to the above water line through and adjacent to Trs4w I and 11 as shown on Map 54, Development of the property will require phased extension of off-site sod on-sin Mallory sewer system. i i , j rar«,.ro~»t,~E..~e,• . 1 , 3 ttaCkea+; 1y, 1 I Slopes Tononranhv. Drains and V etstion This property exhibits the gentle rolling characteristics of the upland prairies north and west of Denton. Because of its past and current agricultural use for pasturing livestock and raising crops, there are few, if any, trees on the property. Uncultivated wild grasses cover the land, with small amounts of scrub brush on the southeast portion of Tract I. Soils fall within the loam and sandy-loam classifications. Typography is shown on Map 5-5, Drainage, None of the property falls within a desivnats. 100-year floodplaia. Portions of Tract Ian, however, shown to be within Zone X o,t FIRM Panel 480194 00050. This designation typically defines areas subject to 500-year floods and only requires the use of open or closed storm drainage systems to accommodate the increased runoff from urban development. i Tract 1 has a high point at elevation 770 MSL adjacent to Loop 288, sloping to the southeast corner elevation of 706 MR. Slopes are generally flat, in the 1-3 percent sage, Loop 288 generally follows a ridge, w4h only stall drainage areas to the south crossing to reach Tract U. Tract t, therefore, is located at the upper reaches of the drainage basin which flow southeast into Pecan Creek and SCS Reservoir * 16, Relatively small drainage flows crass IH- 1 3S from the west onto Tract 1, Tract It slopes to the north and out from a high point of 759 MSL to 710 MSL. Again, slopes are generally In the 1.3 percent range. Neu the center of the tract, a farm pond (not a SCS lake) exists with about 3.0 surface acres of water. ; Existins Public tltilitim Electric. The property falls within a dual service are, with potential electric service from City of Denton Electric Utilities and Denton County Electric Cooperadve. An existing TMPA (Texas Municipal Power Agency) transmission line exists within a 75-foot eataauat on Tract I along the south side of Loop 288, Overhead electrical power distribution Item exist along the out and west sides of both tracts, as well as Wang the east-west road on Tract I and adjacent to US-77 along the north side of Tract 11. Gu, Lone Star Gas Company will serve the property. Existing service is provided tang the IH-35 service road on the western boundary of the 245,8-acre tract ! Telophooo. The property is within the Gioneral Telephone (GTE) service are `•1 Deyelonment Cope fire rota (Opportunities and Constraints) 1, Loop 288 (estimated completion, to early 1942) and its Interchange with IH-35 crates a major new transportation node, apablo of handling sizable voluum of traffic. The presence of both IH-33 and Loop 288 makes this property readily 6ce"ble to ail of Denton and the surrounding regWooll crew 2, Site topography enhsoca the potential for urban development. High points or crests on- site create long views to the north, out, and south. The property also enjoys excellent visibility from both IN-33 and Loop 288. The size of the property, all under single ownership, offers an opportunity to crate the high-quailty urban center envisioned by the City's comprehensive Development Pfau. r~W,w.,rpvr,n in«wr 12 i tii'lllZfl r t I ' and/or immediately svailsbis to the property. Early All utilities are either on the property utllidss (water and sewer) phew developments can pc however, off.$ite water and as slblyaaitsbetY seaccWsrr mmodsad by infrastructure ez is btlag required to permit Significant t development on the property, 4. The current pattern of development in this area of Denton as evidence 'y rroa std! ezterulons and expanslons, current lead use, and approved toning paen with Denton's desire for aa'thban center" along 1H-35 In the vicialtyof Loop 23S. M- 35 and Loop 23$ (when completed) will continue to provide the opportunity for business 1 uses to develop due to the high degree of vblbillty and an aeoessibiilty along thew major i roadways. 5, The exlsting residential neighborhood (Westgate) sdjacent to the east side of Tract ! must be considered by respecting and buffering this residential urea through the use of development regulations such as height standards, screening with man-Made or nature . features, land use densities, etc. % I i i I r i i r ee«.,.roowMww~ 1 13 x M }Yb ` !'ili4V:4ti } 1 ilrir~M I~ i f 'a';. ~ i X1'1 r:.~` ~iY ..'t~,\.r . 4 I: I •1 t ' to Mop s-t EXISTING ROADS I 14 r C:~1Y M~ S 14 Tq!)CK STOi t ItCTAIL UCJ< 9741' UTMH 16 WANT -123 l sw a. .eaWbaln ♦ rr♦^ A I/ rrrr A ~ wens.►.r~ rr ~ r I s~ MiA awl ..r I }bttCflffj ClNtM1N , A►~JACEN~' LAND USE'S I. 5l I '~M~wrM1l►w• , ~ 1•. .'Y ~ , r:r 4 n:r. Y b ik T:Ylet u w i w yp'. 'i L.~ ~ r t ~'!y~ v { ' !W,4 ~ 1: •Y~ irr Y~~ Y f+ ~ 'Y C ~ !~41 tr ~Ya ' ~ ~r 1 S ~~4 tS a a'~[,~:/y a 1:1 a, 'Y•~, •r~ ~f.;. ~Y~•1, YZ •'~`~y~r/rrr rr I +~{N~w~K Yti w~; ~w>'r,4$if+[1 ~Y, i' ~Ywti '~!~Y~Y:::,! r~Ir a E 1 l ~ ~f. ✓'"I r .~i~roaa't -~.f ='1~LT; ML°1~'~f..;, •Yi_ '6t2.-Y __.14. - 3: f 7. ,ia. ,•t r v ►~a 1 , 11, r • , . , ~ Ar ~~~~-,~~Ttt -!.Z ~+'I','ati. rY ~ Y 1 i fat r r.•~ v~ tr ~ I ~ tt~~ 1f/~(r? I .Y __.Y..:...,. ~`C { _ _ 4 1 ;VI ' i :,r ill-• .....,I ~ ~„r~. 1 Y IiL ~ in 1 1'A 'i 4 I it ~i i I I i 1 S `Y I 1 , t_ i f '1 l 1 I l I i. •T" I i I i I Y 4 / ~Y r i Eli a l i , i / ! l l 1 / 1 I / 9 f % i 11 c 1~~ y ~ r 1 `5r i E i ' i i ~i / 10 i i I i 11 LAO r i / J 1 I I' ~ 11 nr;fa i'rbl " rJ 1 r' fILIR 0l M. InrvLCI W m~m . Y2 - I. 4 Ir n't cr ul• ulvl - jj I,II~Y IIf 1. , 11.1. r i,. 1 . I L,1 1 II Mrl1, 1 lflif I xryn 1 -t " R' i. r 1 e' V: 1 1 x ALL l rt l. l 1 l' A'r I t 1. r1]LV 4ti'll 1. ,~I', - rl ♦rg1P:. .I! 1,11'or IlY' 1... F 1.1 11., { c r Ly! M, iY" Iwb'. Cfl l.U 1"1",l-I w P114{'... MA hY 11 JUI" r l S I~I,I~rrl fllq }flea.' 1Iw°,.: LI': w. I~•,i lqr Lx,. f 1.1 If-: .'I .'1 11 'a 11 1' 1 - -11 - AVi1.1`f,. ~I llt s, X1:1, II110 W K IMh Lei 1 Il yl let i L,Y~I /IyP "N . 1 1 ; I I♦ fl. ull 1 ( IIV"I IIIp ((.I 1 Ir1 ~1 Yi 4 fF l i 111 {dV Pll 1' I~ ALA 7 MK I l~ftt l~i V VW.. 1 11 lu ! f. 11q J. 11 1 r AI IRI I,1 AL i, 11 C LLN.~ Er Alp l~F , . . J [ M1fl` N'f r,r~r"l _ I,ef I,ti1s1Ji~ 11 rl lrkr lal i~LM Ow PIr! fl tV ❑V•I J1 i1 c ' ! 11 r i-0.l 11 r flll. 11 L ,fU i i ~IV P' Y.l 'Y.. C 1J 1 1 I t G e 1[ 'rrt 14r C 1.11 1 lif ~u• 411 i. A A., N 'V. 1 M1 INr J 1 l J.4. 41 Irt Yp 1 9+,f S P11 ZI N 11 'IY-'r IR1{ I Iu 11 I Z. 1 0.ft , M I I..i I .:i I1 n.r', It a 1'.- ' ? Ill 1 1 1 44,1 k10 " fI ❑1, GI ,1 flA r 111 IWA.. h[I. ..11 fl 1 ~1 17 IIMif! - f 1 1 h. . 1 nh J 11141 „61 1 ] mllwilM III 1 ~ rlM 111&.K 614 (1, ~Iq lrtl P+M 1.91 vAll L... .11;1 IMW R~lW., t 14.14 ..11 PhAm i t' 4.1111 11 UM,W III Iw M~ 1 l.Vlh Il lq,. /~11~1 ~411{{.Ji J%1.1!'1. 1'. /SI` S1l1 Ptllil i IYY)Y UIYI.. 1. 0.1fh1( i c ~1 L, i ~a , - 1- 1' .~i . `1. ~ II 1 J! a I~ ~y sr. ,~4 1 , 1 , I ~ I'J 1 I h )[,E~] ~ +W y I YrL t 1 - t .'r .~VII114 °~l~iltQMti~1~~u d ' { x ; I I 1 1 i 1 ~ i~ rlEu i f L 1 S i a i ~yl F 'a l ~i - WIN J . Q ~I Exis t 4 J it i i~ 4 ~ ~ PFlDADSED Eyc~ST, (1~°~~~ ~ BL.OC~ Z4 ! ` L. K- 1141, i - F a ' L ' Col"+C, AArn~N T tt~' .y' 1 -tom t I ~ EXIST ASPH.4~.T ~ , mommomd Y I l' ~ EXrsr / i OC9 lop r•• i . r r ' r- t Izr for GyOld 1 ff s S I~ 11'' f'. N_ o .cu:. 1 ~ n..MvEO.r GAYS: 5 DAM r ~ K F3 ClGL~: ~ 046744 710A. , 7-,r wim" WW IIAI20 -14 U . 71 7 . . ...1 11..«- •ts'i' i!'.sw r.va _ ys x .t 'J. r 1 t 1 k'di~a.Y} qry I F~ t I rI I 1 , I 1 , HI+u.M 1MI wIN.1.. t , ~ - ~ ~ C waver ~ vArwr I, ILA 1 ~ A 11 I t w•r•_.+Ir• 1 r.~ U I S -i ' ~ I' { rw I) rrr • +rr+ra A 1'0-eel r , i • Zrr_rrr 'S i ~ rrYr YY YYY A ~ - u,~ ~~yy ` YrY V-Yr YYYY Maps 6-3 , ADJACENT ZONING M 16 r r NiiMC f i <«-NVr f S E ; i i um" MIIgI Map 5-4 ►INI CmIr colig , EXISTING WATER & SEWER . 17 I i ••:~:xr~F~t r rr~rrr.r .ere. ,•.w ~ k ' t r i 1 r ttGbfA aww~ i, f .l OW Mor" .0 i I Map 6-~ DRAINAGE O OUT avoll gill 1R t.n .t RIY~.C: J1 l PROPOSED MOPMENT PLAN i Concent of Land t Ise ActNitia HILLCREST CENTER (24S,g acres) is strategically located in the northwest quadrant of Denton. The property, with Its high degree of accessibility, it's excellent frontage on IH-35 and Loop 288; and its visibility factor, provides a strategic location for a mixed use business center development a Extensive frontage on IM-35 (L4 miles) offers en opportuttity to create a visually attractive, high-quality business corridor. Along the property's eastern and southern edges, a transition zone of office and drainage uses with appropriate, setback, screening, and buttering requirements Is provided to protect existing adjacent residentW developments, HILLCREST CENTER features a variety of land uses, comprehensively planned in concert with, as wail as served by, a unique roadway transportation system, The complement of land 1 uses In the business center include; Retail Activities Commercial Aetivldes Office Activities Manufacturing (clean manufacturing) Housing Activities Institutional Activities „ A list of Permitted Uses and Prohibited Uses Is provided In a following section, Open spaces will 'be provided for drainage ways and water features, roadway right-of-ways, and utility easements. Amenity features will be Integrated into the particular land use kr. activities as (Wall plans are developed Detailed plans will be made available for Clty review and approval as mwkst forces shape specific development needs. Site speodU planning activities will raat»ct development standards contained herein. Also, they will respect all Cityof Denton codes, ordinances, and development regulations, except as detailed la " sport. In accordance with Dentonh Planned Developmeat Ordlnenoe, the Planning and Using Commission has review and approval authority on all Detail Plans submitted on this property. The 249.8-acre mixed-um project will blend Into the existing neighborhood at this strategic loeatlon. Planning has been performed, and will continue to be performed in such a manner os to respect existing land uses adjacent to the property through the use of property buffering and screening techniques. The proomd zoning concept will provide the opportunity for strengthening and diversifying the local economy by exo Wing employment opportunities as well as expanding the tax base of the City of Denton, Religion to Denton DeveienmentReligion to Denton Plan The Denton Development Plan is the master plan for Denton's future growth. It Is "non- traditional" in the sense that it provides for a flexible planning process, which includes guidelines for growth, rather than the'traditlour fixed land use daitn maps, l i , . ~ FJNe,e6r00'!~It1.IV~OM 14 i tyti~b)S>(j 1 , HILLCREST CENTER's mixed-use business proposal is consistent with the Intent of the Denton Development Plan in several wayx I, The proposal provides the opportunity, with the City's approval, for this strategic location to be marketed and developed as an "urban center In northwest Menton", an area which, until now has been withheld from development opportunities, Under single ownership, &comprehensively planned quality development can now occ u r, 2. The proposal provides the opportunity for Denton to broaden Its tax base by approving a future business development at this strategic location in the City, 1 3, The proposal would create an "activity center" which is proposed in the Denton Development Plan, 4, The proposal respects and protects the existing residential neighborhood adjacent i to the property, and complements adjacent toning. i • Denton's Development Plan contemplate the Urban Center In northwest Denton as a "node configuration," cantered oe the Loop 203 / lH-3S interaeotion. The H(LLCRW CENTER Proposal is consistent with this nation and. In addition, recognias the economic influence of the W- 35 Corridor, HILLCREST CENTER has been comprehensively planned, re caul the Wnton Development Plea desires, the market focus related to the IH-35 Corridor, logical l land use patterns, and a graat deal of sensitivlty to the existing neighborhood. This toning proposal contemplates urbaa center (mixed business; use) for the total 243.8-acres, with lower floor-to-area ratios (EARL substantial buffering, screening proposals, as well as limited land uses along the existing residential neighborhood. HILLCREST CENTER's proposed waiag Is consistent with the development Intent of the Denton Development Plan, which envisions an empioymeat/activity node at this strategic location, Existing investateata In transportation facilities (s,g., 1H-35 and Loop tall) will permit Denton to capture significant mew non-raidentlal tax base. The TH-35 corridor Is a major economic development Influence In the Stage of Texas and this Proposal provide Denton the opportunity to take further economic advantage of the IH-35 influent A. Trantoortation The proposed transooradom plan is dawn on the Proposed Road!i Mop (Map 6-1) turd the Concept/Developtatnt Plan (Mgp d-21. It Includes the following odwipal fatum shown on the Proposed Roads Map (Map 6-1). AU roads shown era Intootletl to be public rotuht developed In aeeordeace with City of Denton design and cotutrucaloa standanb. Upgraded sorthbovad froamp road of ltI-3S providing at least two-lance of Permanent pavia$ Proposed two-Iona frontage reads along each side of Loop 28S. Within Tract I, an or,-site roadwsy (Road A) connecting the northbound frontage road of IH-35 at existing Wwpts to the proposed tutbound fronttg* road of Loop 28E. This Is Proposed to be a four-lane divided Secondary Artetlai. ' 20 xu~~a t i • A similar roadway (Road By on Tract (I' from as opposite point at the proposed westbound frontage road of LOOP 2116 to the northbound frontage road of IH-35. This is llmwise intended to be a four-lane divided Secondary After Ili- • Road C on Tract t is proposed to connect Road A to the east-west proposed i roadway on PD-115. It Is planned as a four-IM undivided roadway, and along i with Road A, satisfies the requirement of the Deacon Thoroughfare Plan for an east-west Collector street in this area. • Road D on Tract I will function as a two-way circulation roadway, increasing the accessibility of the tracts fronting the one-way frontage road of tH-35, On the F south and, It ends In a cul-de-sac, Road D Is planned as as undivided Collector r ' street, ; • Road E on Tract t will servo to connect Road D to the northbound frontage road of IH-35. It will be an undivided Collector simllar to Road D. I Road F on Tract ii will connect Road 9 to US47, It is envisioned as a four-lane divided Secondary Arterial which could be extended north of US-M i t s~-e s and Clrcui to ien I1 PgOestf I Internal to HILLCREST CENTER constructed oa both sides iA accordance with l I , All public roses will have sidewalks City of Denton Codes. Ordinances, and Developrnetst Regulations. 2, HILLCREST CENTER will encourage individual 'users" within the property to include coordinated pedestrian circulation system: In their detailed asli Plans accordance with the Denton Planned Developm tot Ordinance all De if must be considered and approved by the Planning; and Zo~t~ d missb n prior to actual development of :specific piece of property f External to HILLCKM CENTER 1. Presently, there is Ito pubes pedestrian arxeas/circulation "to bjm*°t to any portion of HILLC•REV CENTER's boundary. In the sytot a pub id p system develops adjacent to HILLCRir.4T CEN'MIK's bouaderlea, IMLCRE nlzr ST " the CENTER, is good filth, wiU work w th the City taco aof the l** t sr within system, and provide the oppor - ty for HILLCREST CENTER, if deemed feaalbw by HILLCRIMY CENTER, 2, Any sidewalks which are part of a public roadway Intersecting the boundary of , HILLCREST CENTER will be cantiaued withla HILLCREST CENTER as a part of the roadway system consistent with City of Deeson Code) and Ordinances. thllltie! and Drainata The property is located at the upper reach of the drainage basins. On-site dt'elnage can be accommodated through a designed system of enclosed pipe and open channels, all developed standar i th the envi~foeed as a paro f he cimstar dntinsget plan edtlon at the and southeast corner lof Tract 1i Iy of i I 21 , I '.a <.I. 1. ~ - ~ - yz. 1 i dSiR:=t t , 1 i Water main extensions from off-site locations will be required to satisfy long-term demand. On=site, a looped system of mains will be developed to meet the domestic, irrigation, and fire flow demands of the expected development. On-site mains are expected to be installed within roadway rights-of-way and along property boundaries. Sanitary sewer main extensions to the property will be required. On-site, trunk main and a system of gravity lines and new/expanded lift stations with force mains will be required to support expected development. Specific locations of utilities (water and sewer) will be designed as part of Detail Plans for parcels as they develop. Ali such utilities will meet the design and construction standards of the City of Denton. f For other public utilities (gas, electric, telephone) a coi•rdinated master plan will be !P imptemented to serve the needs of individual tracts at time of actual development, The particular needs of probable business center users for expanded communication service and dual electric feeds will be considered, A conceptual master plan for drainage and utilities has been provided separately for review by City staff t Parm)t ed BusingsiCenter Land Uses In keeping with the "Business Center Concept" for the development of the 245.8-acre tisot, the majority of the 245.8-acre Planned Development Proposal permits land uses consistent with the "urban center" theme for the project. These uses are described below. Certain uses ' are prohibited In this project. These are described accordingly. On the southern and of the 243.8 acres along dim existing adjacent single-family neighborhood, a "transition area' Is proposed. The only permitted land use in this arcs is "office use" and a proper landscaping buffer or screening wag Is proposed. The maximum building height for the area will be one story. These development regulations us covered in l the Special Provision section of this Ordinance, i The "Permitted Uses" In the Business Center are as follows: I. Retail and ier►itw Any esablishment whose primary purpose is to provide goods and services to the general public for their use or consumption. The permitted use shalt exclude residentlal uses. 2. Commercial: Any proposed use or proposed mix of uses, Including multiple dwelling unit development and hospitality, uses, Multiple dwelling unit development Is permitted only when approved in conjunction with and a part of commercial development, Tlh„ ~cspltallty uses will provide facilities which offer transient lodging accommodations to the general public and which provide additional servloos such at, but not limited, to resteuttutts, tweeting rooms, and recreation facilities. Uses such as hotels and motels and convention and meeting conference facilities will provide support for the office, Institution, and manufacturing/distribution uses in the district. 3, Office: Office type uses with support retail facilities servioing theomployees are encouraged as support for the manufacturing and commercW uses or as Independent office developments which are well plann#d! amenity-orlented facilities for service, industrial, and Institutionally related users. fI YJ~'.tia19 NUVl'M IIwMr- I 22 i l 1 ~j I"t.'EFy'~I lSMttita': 4, Manufacturing: This classification permits the development of manufaeturinR land uses and excludes any residential land uses and the prohibited uses listed In this plan for the business and Industrial park area. This classification encourages clean manufacnuing, assembly and wanshouse, and distribution type facilities. 5. Instltudoaal: Governmental, educational, medical, and cultural facilities are compatible within the business and industrial park, except for residential uses and those prohibited uses listed in this Ordinance, 6. Recreational: The manufacturing, commercial, and institutional uses may have recreational facilitles to support the health and welfare of employees. These types of recreational uses are permitted if they are developed In conjunction with the open spaces and intent of the overall planned development, 7. Farm and RaacY.* Farming, ranching, and agricultural type activitles are permitted In the District, 8, Accessory Uses: The use of land or a building or portion thereof customarily incidental and tubordinate to the principal use of the Ind or building and located i on the same lot with such principal use are permitted. The fullowing specific uses are permitted as primary land uses within the district PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL USES Hotel or Motel EDUCATIONAL; INSIT17LMON, AND SPECIAL USES Art Oallery or Museum College, University, or Private School Community Center (Public) Day Cams Day Nursery or KladerW%n School Ftlrground or ExWbitlo t Ara Fraternity, Sorority, Lodge, or Civic Club Hospital (General Acute Care) Hospital (Chronic Care) Library (Public) Nursing Home or Residence Home for Aged Occasional Sala School, Private Primary or Secondary School. Business or Trade UTILITY, ACC9=RY, AND INCIDENTAL USES Accessory Bvildiag Community Censor (Private) EleotrieW Substatkna Electrical TramamWian Line Field or Conttructioa Office (Temporary) Fire Station or Similar Public Safety Building Gas Transmissloo Line and Metering Station Local Utility Distribution Linea Off-street Parking Imoldantai to Maln Use Private Utility Shop or Storage Yard Public Building, Shop, Yard of Local State or Federal Oovermmeat Radio and Television or Micro-wave Tower e~,eena►oo+►~w ie«w,r 23 1 Sewage Pumping Station Swimming Pool (Private) Telephone,. Business Office Telephone Line & Exchange Switching or Relay Station Water Reservoir, Water Pumping Station, or Well s RECREATION AND ENTERTAINMENT USES Amusement, Commercial (Outdoor) Amusement, Commercial (Indoor) J Country Club (Private) with Golf Course Dance Hall or Night Club Go Cart Track ' Golf Course (Commercial) Roller or Ice Skating Rink Swim or Tennis Club Theater, Other Than Drive-in Type t1 TRANSPORTATION RELATED USES Airport Landing Field or Heliport Bus Station or Terminal Hauling or Storage Company l Motor Freight Terminal Railroad Passenger Station Railroad Truck or Right-of-way 3 Parking Lot Truck Parking Lot or Structure (Commercial) f AUTO SERVICE USES f f Auto Laundry Auto Painting and Body Repair Auto Sales and Repair (la bnllding) Gasoline Service Station New Auto Para Sales Stores r New or Used Car Sala Lot (in open) Seat Cover and Muffler Installation Shop Used Auto Puts Sala (in building) RETAIL AND SERVICE TYPE USES Antique Shop Bakery or Confeetlooery Shop (Retail) Cafeteria Claiming and Prating Satan Stag and Pick-up Custom Personal S*rvke Shop f Drapery, Needlework, or Weaving Shop I Florist or Gordon Shop f Greenhouse or Plant-Nursery (Retail) Htndlomft Shop Household Appliance Service and Repair Mimeograph, Stationery, or Letter Shop Laundry or Cleaning Self Service Mimeograph, Stationery or Letter Shop Mortuary or Funeral Pulor Offices, Profesalon .1 and AdnWilotrotive Off-Premise Sale of Bear and/or Wine slw,w.rca,„».,~ 24 1 j aiw~en;~ N { On Premise Sale of Beer and/ot wine Licensed Private Club Restaurant 4.0W square feet or less Retail Stores and Shops Retail Stores and Shops over e,t>a0 square feet Studio for Photographer, Muslclan, Artist, of Health secondhand Store, Used Furniture, or Rummage said Tool or Trailer Rental AORICULTURAL TYPE USES Animal Clinlo or Hospital (no outside runs or pens) ` Animal Cilnia, Hosohal, Of Kennel (with outside runs or pens) i Farm or Ranch Greenhouse or Plant Nursery Livestock Auction COMMERCIAL TYPE USES Bakery (Wholesale) Building Materw Saks Cabinet and UphobgrY Shot/ Cigning snd D"10111 Pt"' (Cocamerew) Cleaning Plant, Bags of Carpets (so"i equip or Fsbrtcation Clothing Manufacture or Litttt Compounding Engine arw mow lt"Wrins HeeaavytMachinery Sales to Stoml* job Printing of Ne"pow printing Laundry Plant (Commercial) Milk Depot. Dairy, or la Crews Plant Paint Shop Wbolaala Petroleum Products Storage Plumbing Shop Solentifia or Raaareh Labor W140 Storage or Salas wanhotw Trailer Rental or Salea Termitttl Wholeaaia Off a~aea SttaaOM Raw NATURAL RESOURCE USF•S Puroiaucs or ON we" Fealgtlas petroleum Colwod" or S6xw SPECIAL iNDUSTRtAL PROCESSES t uaas whioh treat the perform"" stt»sdsrds tatriai L1gHt Mrwfaotaring or ladt ptesarlbvd by 11,1t~ l through 1 rooht+»a~r 1 i Y.. , 1 prohitfttati..l~BIIf ; -this section shalt be prohibited as the primary use of land on any lot or tract identified Vses identified in this 245,8 acre pr po plaster Junk or Salvage Yard ; Cement, lime, gypsum or 4tachin6 Shop or welding manufacturing Mining or topsoil extraction Cemetery mobil itome display or sales Chemicals and allied products paper or Pulp manufacture i (manufacturing) Pawn shop { Churches petroleum products refining Concrete cr Asphalt batch pitaa Public schools (elementary, junior or l (permanent facilities) t senior high school) Contractor's Yard (permamsa) Railroad yard or roundhcuse Fat rendering or animal reduction Sexually oriented buslnestua Fertilizer manufacturing, Smelting or ores or metals Forgo Plant Stockyards of slaughterhouse Ciu, butane, propane 00entiotts Halfway house v ment density Development Standards, area ra wadons, and develop r ~,led to each of the uses he 245,8-acre propped arc listed as follows, f7evelopmenr Standards cad Special 'tied In t Permitted 4 Provisions ars Si]wtratad on Moo 6-3, I . RNaii The deveiopasedt atede, area rejuts tlons, and development intatssity or nail use shall be as follows: for property deli/acedf { minimum lot area None Minimum lot width None Minimum lot depdt Noce Front yard setback 2S Ft. Rau yard setback to ft. Side Yard setbeAk to Ft. Corner lot nqui»trr+a 2$ Ft. Maximum buikfia{ Mei/ht 4S Ft. 3496 Maximum lot cW#WW ratio A s listed for each r 0.8,1 itted use in the Ebo to rm h axlmutn or eso Ae M Ptrkin/ Denton Zonin/ Ordinance i Gv,kearoa+t~ wr+,• 26 i T h7i r s 2. Commercial: The development 'standards, area regulations, and development Intensity for property designated for commercial use shall be as follows: Minimum lot area None Minimum lot width ISO Ft. Minimum lot depth None Front yard setback 25 Ft. Rear yard setback 10 Ft, Side yard setback 10 Ft. Corner lot requirement 25 Ft. Maximum building height 20 Stories Maximum lot covewage SO% ! Maximum floor to area ratio 2:1 Parking As listed for each use in the Denton Zoning On, finance 3, Office: The development standards, am regulations, and development intensity for property designated for office use shall be u follows: Minimum lot area None Minimum lot width Nona Minimum lot depth None Front yard setback 2$ Ft. j Rear yard setback 10 Ft. Side yard setback 10 Ft. Corner lot requirement 25 Ft. Maximum building height 20 Stories Maximum lotcoversgi $0% Maximum floor to area ratio 2:1 Parking 1 SP/30010 i" of floor arse (1) (1) 1 space/250 SF for clinics or Doctors' offices. 4, Maartacturlag: The development standards, arse regulations, and development intensity for property designaad for Manufacturing use shW be as follows: Minimum lot area 3 Acres Minimum lot width 200 Ft, Minimum lot depth None Front yarn setback 25 Ft. Rear yard sstbaok 10 Ft. Side yard setback 10 Ft, Corner lot requirement 25 pt, Maximum bulkiing height 42 Ftdi> Maximum building coveram 7S% Maximum floor to area two l:i Parking I SP/ 1000 SF, of floor area (1) Height may be Increased by I foot above 42 feet for each I foot of Increase In the frnnt, side, and rear yard setbacks, up to a maximum of s stories. &SMtecow" iewr+ 27 ff'A gripy~!j1 L i 5. Institutional: The development standards, area regulations, and development intensity for property designated for institup?'nal use shall be as follows: Minimum lot area None Minimum lot width None Minimum lot depth None Front yard setback 25 Ft. Rear yard setback io C't. Side yard setback 10 Ft. Corner lot requirement 25 Ft. Maximum building height 45 VQI) Maximum lot coverage 50% i Maximum floor to area ratio 2:1 Parking I SP/300 SF. of floor area (1) Height may be increased by I foot above 42 feet for each I foot of increase in the front, side, and rear yard setbacks, up to a maximum of 20 stories. NOTE: The minimum rear and side yard setbaoks shall be 20 feet for any land use abutting a multi-family zoning district or property used for a multifamily j dwelling. i I, Special Provisions I. The overall density of devellWosot shall be subject to the following limitations A. North of Westgate • Overall maximum FAR 1.5: I l I a Individual site maximum FAR 2-, l I 9. South of Westgate i I Overall madmum FAR +.1,111 : I • Individual site rmaLwasa FAR l : i 0 Transition tone (Tract !F) maximum FAR 0.3 ; 1 2. The maximum height wi" the 243.3-acre tract shall not exceed twenty (20) stories, In the area of the 243-3cre tract, which is located south of Weetgaa Drive, the maximum height shall not exceed ten (10) stories. (Refer to No. 4) 3, Development within the 243.8-acre tract will be regulated by the list of permitted uses, the list of prohibited ow, the overall floor to am ratio, and the City of Denton ordinances relating to latdaypiog, sareealpt, sigwtge, and performance stwtdards. Also, the cove netats, conditions. and restrictions my be placed on the property by the owner to further control the quality of the development 4. In accordance with the land use concept of this ^D severai special provisions are designed for the area of the 243,11-acre tract which is located south of Westgate Drive (Tract I, Parcel 2)• They are is followr. 1 Fa~,r,aYf)O yIY..IM+M~+ 28 i i A, The ove~-ail density of development for the gross area of this Portion of the 245X acres shall not exceed a floor to area ratio of ,75 to l (,75:1). The maximum floor to area ratio on any one site shall not exceed 1 to I (r1}. B. A "transitional area" is established along the eastern boundary of the property below Westgate Drive. The area west of and along the esat property line 300 feet wide, i.e. to the centerline of the proposed road is restricted to office use. Also included in this "transitional area" is an area of land located directly north of the Westgate subdivision. The "transitional area" is shown on the attached exhibit Development Standards. new provisions Include,. (1) Maximum Height - l story (2) Maximum floor to area ratio of .5 to I to wall to be provid of off Ice uses on the partaitng (3) , ascreen or rea prior 6 residential C. The maximum height within this area shall be ten (10) stories. i , i 5. Terms - Tertm used in the General Concept Plan/ Development Plan shall have meaning as defined In the code of ordinances of the city or Denton unless defined in this plan, Concept Plan. athe nd Development 6. Ordinance governing - This District, Gene all o i and shall ~ v Plan a of are approved in accordance with an I Article I I of Appead of B, zoning of the code of ordiaanaa. also be subject to the MunloiptilbAiirport Zoning Regulations within and Federal 1 hall Vinton ` Regulaions. 1 8, In calculations of F,AX, Parking facilities shall not be Included to calculating the floor to area ratio. 9. Road Allgnmestta - Adjustments in crib location of roads sbownnt non this ~ plan any be made without amendment cud constructed. in with City of Denton public roads shall ba designed j design criteria and construction standards In effect at do dote of detail plan approval. Id. Landscaping, Treq, and Signs -The regulations of the Denton landscape code in effect on the delta of the approval of this plan, shall apply to the District. 11. Amendments - An application made to amend this Ordis ance, Including the concept/devskoment plan provisions for a "specific tract" within the 245,8-acre project, shall only require owner notification of land Iocated within 209 feet of that "specific tract' 12, IH-35 Corridor Setback - Along the 1H-35 frontage, a 40-foot building setback line shall be established, Within this 40-foot setback, the first o20 l am shtall bet t Parking shW be pr this designated 20-foot Utility utility and and a landscape peasame"G PJ!WMAIW,ttM.IONRA 29 y i f 1LYf. ,41M . t A r t wail KIM" Mole . rr r► sm"If i tr emu" "am* ` V i . rr'V ry w Y 1 C~'~t0 ~`1 1 Map . PROPOSED ROADS ,.~ww f ( ks ~ { . 1 I It ~ , y r. IA tC ~ I I r..J 1A nw'► j PROPOSED USES i. b.M 'W. Awm'UIM WOO i 64 ii bl 115 ! wrr 1.1 tlr■ i Co" I INlly 115 1 ■N <.do 1~yp i.MYIIY. I:1 i. Arm TRAY M AWA .wrww A" 0~ WSW 6N Ir.M Molt y 04 pol ur Yw rM w sa to WA~ r L..J Map g-2 CONCEPT /DEVELOPMENT PLAN _ 31 I I t t' 0 Ir pA ~~N !i I i qt~~ 3 a• I I I1 I I j aA .rte I j I ~ I I it to I. rrr N w« Wk (FAA)' i a.Ir Y.T.+^ir . oral rrr r ~rIyr . Lal ~wYr YY17r YY, Ila . aa~ L NVp{ MalaaO lap i S~ lraa N Mir 1 N~1y: ur w Illzzl - f =0 Mr/M IYMNMYr M 0~ \r LW YY kawom Am 4k" 0 LW WO WWAIO 60 M+Mr LOB' 1 FOWL 1 IY rW YYI = wo 04 is NI IYIW nm.'r «r 6 M MrM W wNYr E . a N Wft OWO-W* W YNrrYrlllMll 'Y w / ~ Y"WMw « OMNa MMM I «rl 4L 014 of ~ W 94 mw jMr=J L "a so :w 0 ON A 4 14 III` II t s a N « w « rlYr~ «I NIMwa r« rw » ' I V M W j Yr alrw M arrlYrr~ W M« N «M IWa aViN W w ~raMMrr)I M Or1W A 1 w %r rw YY w Ir/~« « Mr rM rrrr N w orarr. < ! MIY~illxf li, i • 1 w 1A MMwWWnry~My oft" N MM4rNM11Y IWW wM YMrrM NM~iI •Mr~ N~ 11. N•N C!'M laMN 'yli~W lM N•7a hM11M. .y,. « yMiyyWMYoMM~IMIN !111W « ~6WAAL A 7!'Ni111Wf MI N Map 6-3 I HILLCRalY CtNttK I ' DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS .....r.r 1 32 I 1 w Fm 2 rye+~.a i _J l dvV4 IN r I I I~ fi . I I I I E j 4. mm was I~ I ~I DA"Y LANE LOII~~T CROSS-SECTION Y 33 s ~y s-9 d.w HEIGHT IH STORIES o ~ la !o ! t ! ! I. I 1 1 N 1 I ! N t ! i IMRR.AA~'f 3II ! I 1 ! ' I ! a I 1 I OWN ! i i I I m".... I 1 ! ! If . I I i I 1 II SAL IIRA~ ~ 1 1 ! I ~ I 1 ewnwaA~ I I t t i I „m I, twer wuariw. I t *a" MOT" I i ! i HIk.LCRl6T ClNT~ LAND USEMEIGHT p~NY01i ~OIMNO _ a 9 { r ATTACHMENT 2 RANCHO VISTA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 5000 THANKSGIVING TOWER DALLAS, TEXAS 75201 t f i Y I May 20, 1991 I Mr. Frank H. Robbins Executive Director for Planning and Development City of Denton, Texas 215 East McKinney . Denton, Texas 76201 r RE: Hillcrest Center ; Denton, Texas y 4 _ Dear Mr. Robbins: in our recent work session with the Planning and zoning commission, we were directed to provide further information concerning the relationship of our proposal to the Denton Development Plan. t w with i ~ specifically, we were asked to request a "Plan Amendment" supporting justification concerning the extension of the "Urban 1 Center Area" in northwest Denton. Rancho Vista Development { t Company, in accordance with these desires, requests an amendment j be made to the Denton Development Plan. We would appreciate the i I processing of such an amendment: in a manner which is concurrent with the time frame on ouz zoning application. Our specific request involves a southward extension of the Urban Center boundary (from Westgate) on the east side of T.H. 35 in northwest Denton (refer to attached Exhibit A - p.16 1988 Denton Development Plan) and designation of Tract IF on map 6-2 of our April 4, Hillcrest Center zoning application as a 'moderate intensity area". The attached Exhibit B, illustrates our specific t request. We feel our zoning proposal of April 7 addresses the relationship to the Denton Development Plan in several meaningful ways and is consistent with the intent of the Denton Development Plan. Our Hillcrest Center zoning proposal reflects a comprehensively planned Urban Center at this location in Denton which recognizes logical land use patterns, goals of the Denton Development Plan, eeononie influence and transportation patterns. Also our proposal exhibits in several ways (screening, height limits, etc.) a great deal of sensitivity to the existing residential neighborhood at the southeast edge of our property. The designation of areas as per this proposal (i.e, extending the Urban Center and designating the 1 Frank H. Robbins i Hillorest Center Denton, Texas Page Two area adjacent to the neighborhood as a "moderate intensity area") j will permit an orderly planning and development process which will y lhelp to avoid address Corridor, commercial" look adjacency the sI.H. as the ! Frank, T have summarized above, the relationship our ppinlour- the Denton Development Plan (an overview of p. 61 and 6-o2 proposal) as well as provided proposed amendments and justification; for such amendments to the Denton Development Plan. if you need further information or have any questions in regard to this matter, please let me know. ' f t. Sincerely, RANCHO VTST DEVETAPMENT COMPANY Donald D. Dillar 1 Vice president td Enclosures (2) i i i o i E j 1 E. f r ~ 'r s f s,4cYr ~=+~a F f 9 •."a i .a•eF.. ~y { .p: ~r sq,r.: r:. f • I A - i l IA ` PROPOSED USES i kM AurY ~.r..w 1W H60A, twl N %an VYwI CrMr 10 .u.N1 Lt l15rc~4r>✓ ~VVO 12,1 Y~~IrtrM 10M.w p sou or,w. cEw~. ,o • laal Iaw~. C.ir ,o r.w s,+ su o...w 10i""" oy I? &.WAW 404V me M42 606"b Ow~w- 11 NYW bl ii. ` y1'14'7 . i w Ar r = 1r +1/ M I' / / , • ~y~' Q tom, I' a`6J P 00 XltllT i_ .._S ~ Map 6-'2 1 17 HILLCRLST CENTER i _ - CO"KEPT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1,w fWf,••••+ CONCEPT MAP., I NORTH i ~'J ' r X~• ME Urban Canters .1H ` I I f 1 v x I I' r _ Special Purpose Major I,.. • y Activity Center , . tModerate ACllYlly Canter M .I. a . ~ I,i ~r ~M I Low Intensity Arose 1 '1 . i i V~ r-, ,t~~ ' I I i 1 , I = k I t 1~ ~ t I Fl ~ I ~i I ry( t7 1-W w t 4Yr.wei+!W0400 pN D nnlnp and Dauaiopmenl Department II'Sl (~J .Lrge~ r•`.. City o: enlon r rslarez ATTACHMENT 3 j TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS f ; HILLCREST CENTER 245.8 ACRES { DENTON, TEXAS P, i f HILLCREST CENTER ii RANCHO VISTA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY I~ i .39 i Revised; Juno o, +Qq1 E Wy 22, 1981 i j. I 1 INTRODUCTION A zoning request has been submitted to the City of Denton for HILLCREST CENTER, a 245,8-acre business center in northwest Denton. During the course of Development Review Committee (DRC) consideration, a traffic impact analysis (TIA) was requested. This document has been prepared in response to that request. 1 - , y LOCATION This property is 245,8 acres in northwest Denton located along and adjacent to the east side of IH-35 from it point 4,000 feet south of new Loop 288, north to US-77. It Includes undeveloped land along both sides of Loop 288 between IH-35 and the interchange with US- 77, The property has a total of S,500 feet of frontage on IH-35 and 5,600 feet of frontage on t Loop 288 along with frontage on US-77. All of the property has been in the limits of the City i f of Denton fo - a number of years and is shown in red on the following area map. i ' a ~ ~qpp 2~i w 1 o H1LLCREST CENTER I>•etfon, 5axar ii vlcYmllinon~: n,F!il~r In ~0 j I 1;~ ' 45Tkit5 t. Y 1 1 CURRENT CONDITIONS This property is undeveloped, having been used for farming and ranching operations up to this point, It continues, even today, to be used for agricultural uses. % Existing Roads I As shown on the Existing Roads Map (Map 5-1), Tract I is bounded on the west by Iii-35, and an the north by Loop 288. Loop 288 is currently under construction with anticipated I completion in 1992. IH-35 provides a high level of visual and traffic accessibility, offering I non-stop traffic flow between Mexico and Minnesota, Within the tract, a two-lane rural-type roadway exists to connect Westgate to the northbound frontage road of IH-35. Tract II is bounded on the west by 1-35, on the south by now Loop 288, and on the north, it t touches US-77 at two locations, There are no existing roads on-site. Existing Adjacent Land Uses and Zoning The existing adjacent land uses and zoning ate shown on the Adjacent Land Use and Adjacent Zoning Maps (Maps 5-2 and 5-3). The existing adjacent land uses are: • A rdsidential subdivision east of and adjacent to Tract 1. s • Camping World - a now facility directly across IH-35 from Tract I and south of Loop 288. • Union 76 truck stop at the southeast corner of US 77 at IH-35, adjacent to Tract lh j • Truck stopand commercial retail center westof IH-35 near the north end of Tract iL All other adjacent land is devoted to agricultural rigs for pasturing livestock and producing crops. Current zoningon adjacent property can be described by reference to three (3) PD's and three (3) zoning districts as shown on the Adjacent Zoning Map (Map 5-3). 'T'hsse are described ; to follows: • Westgate Neighborhood - The existing single-family neighborhood immediately east of Tract 1 is zoned SIP-16, and contains approximately 35 acres. The maximum allowable building height in this area is 2f stories. • North of Tract 11, the Union 76 truck stop is located on land zoned C- Commercial, C-Commercial zoning exists on all land (within City limits) across US-77 from the Union 76 truck stop to the north of Tract 11 and also on the west side of [H-35 at US-77. r i West of IH-35, where Camping World is located, the property is zoned Ll-Light Industrial, This LI Zoning extends on the west side of I1-1-33 south to US-380. PD-110 - A 25.6-acre Planned Development for office, commercial, and retail uses on two tracts adjacent to Loop 283 at US-77. Approved in 1986, this PD permits a maximum of 1.0 million SF of development, five (5) stories high, and 50 percent coverage. No development activity has occurred, 2 H wsLVNakncnn,vpw.iu ~ / k1L.Y.'YXX 4' ` a W 100 ,e0 I v~ j r 'A Map g-1 EXISTING ROADS MUCKIa c~t~ 15Y r1 Wm~ A F {`rryj@St ! I y 11 1 r I 1 ~'I ~ ~ f ~ I I 1 TRUCK STOP & RETAIL ,r.r....1•+1 •r rrr. r.. ~ jl i , . ~SiOP 1 . WOO Tf TRUCK A U f r~ PO-123 j- to C A PD- 0 I -..ter poor :i ~ J ` ••~'~~J / r , ~ , 11.1 ~ ' 1 L°•----_.._ L.h► ut PD No \VI LLlli '1 y 1 A 1 , 1 rrrrrwr 1 11. C MMKO WORLD y srrr~•_rw rrrrLrr.l~ .$;Sx 011111111k now rrrrr wr rrr »N .r rrr .rrr r rrr • {yn1+r A Pb-si NN, k4o r 1 A A rrwrrrr _r~` 'y ':'C.. \ ~ rrr ~r PD-I3 , rrrN ♦rr 3 .rrrrrr .rrr r~r Map' 8-2 HILLOR411T CVNI!i' *AMW VI ,P«:.,1, I ADJACENT LAND USES M n _ w7 I I l`` Po 123 TRUCK I 110 _ V I Sf#i 'Djvom i Loot lu iI PD-NO w ` 4-1 IA I ~I A, f 1 t , ~ I IG MYY MAI ~ I 1 . I t l" v U SIrT r • I \ Krrrrrrrrr • j 1~1..~ . tTIItL•t.i1: ` ~ ~ ~ IV wlk%%~ A ".r~ 1 A • . 1 '..,111. ~r.r PDrI] r.r rrrrrrr rrrr yr 11 .ArlI,$!9. C r, as C po~~ ~t ; rr_d - Maps 6-3 / "~~~I'~~I ImLCRE$T CLINTi01 AAXdW YMIA NIyt1mMVf CIt►AUI x~«.I•MMA ADJACENT' ZONING T°" 7 T^H `.i PD-113 - Located south of and adjacent acrestOf neighborhood service r6 ail, 9 oC 16.75 acres of two-,tory office, acres of cluster housing, 27.74 acres of SF-10 single-famiiy housing, SF- 16 sing torm drainage. le-family housing, and 2.17 acres for detention of s Approved in 1986, no development has occurred within this PD. PD-1 15 - This 239:17-acre PD istl Boenieast 0' . it permitst the following r uses t Brao south of PD-110, extending east and research boratorieSt ,93 acres General retail, scientifv[ ho lesale off icelaand sarnPle 41 engine/motor repair, room uses I 44.94 acres Office 11.34 acres MF' 1 21.85 acres MF-R 38.97 acres SF-7 23.41 acres SF-10 1 ' u 19.31 acres SF-16 r; zero Int line SF )tomes • 21,42 acres Public park » 14.00 acres , no development has occurred since the PD's approval In 1986. Again r PRO O,iC Deyc]LQPMs at the Stra to be an urban business [H cener 35 and Loop 288tpAn HILLCREST CENTER created by prop the osed interchange of two Including retail, office, comme"let, transportation node freeways " of 0,75.1 integrated complement of non- O, has ben PIOS~d within an umbrella density The Pro manufacturing, and institutional uses to and 1. 5.1 ud th o conf figuration, acreage rty Sou FAR on thve~opment Plant(Mvl p 6 ) show the propo Concept/De roadway alignments. for location of specific uses [n flexibility this stage to ide Tha ntify individual proposed Planned Development (PD) provides a remit, uses was assumed, response to market demands. AS, a mixture of non rasidential land uses by parcel, For analysis puposes. of development at build-out,within theimated abo e which would produce 5,300,400 squsro feet tha even aggressive, build-out is less than the theorotic 1coonnsidered toabeorealistiar mixed consider erha(A even nters. This permitted FARS, Howevet. is -use in land to preserve reflects ing the the non-CBD location and the pus experience of sum the typical desire of users for "campus settings" and over-buY g room for expansion Phases, unonctRD ROAD Ma 6-V) and the ln8 principal features shown on The proposed transpnttp~ n (Map 6-2). it ownl the the Includes proposed Follow °ntended to be public roads roads shown tire Concept/Devetopme All the Proposed Roads Map (Map 6.1). developed in accordance with City of Denton design and constructionlstandardslanes of Upgraded northbound frontage road of IH-35 providing 01 permanent paving. ~ II VIhTMJl~lknti lt,A4ll~,t~ J 4J 8 I~ I ' 0 trl l10 10r I low f ~ AoAO Y i so ` , r to r J i , 1 ' IA ; PRoPosto USES a.R !wowed rM latir~ M ' y, 6+.N VrYr Cr1r ppy Nww LI y 1111 Yed W row 4 co" I r 10 %v mow. l~ rww i i o'b'i"' 1 srl i n holow "Wif ~',K IrwW/ W ra, M N M y MrM+. M MM red. 1M / IS OWN M rwIwm w M fl IMMMI R w w~l Nr!M„ Rlw V 1 Mr M w 61 ~ r MM i r~hlr .MME M r„ged~ rYA10iw~ I 3 .lol hMYw kwhow ~M rwwM r 1,,.~ IN M r w R 0M, 10 M• W rwll IiblrM r w w.edrr r w 00100100 *04" A VIA aw""o 1 r f ~II IIIiI Map- 6-2 ftLCRIST CUM I CONCEPT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN ."Ord IfA11iX 41 t , 4 i I ye r.Y I 1~ 1 owY F¢7yi Iln► 1 i am$** matt . rM1 'p . me IV MMY _ ti, 10 f ..y i map 8 -1 i 1 ROOT CENT-olt - - - - - - - - - - - - - - pWTOe, TIMID Vol 4 S 4 PROPOSED ROAD ~ 4irkl~~ r t .F51tk.'e'?1a7 v Proposed two-lane frontage roads along each side of Loop 288, to be constructed at the appropriate time in response to traffic demand. Within Tract i, an on-site roadway (Road A) connecting the eastbound frontage wua °f Ised frontage. opc road of 1H_35 at existing Westgate a to the re div ded Secondary All-fiat, Loop 288. This is proposed to n opposite point at the proposed from • A similar roadway (Road B) on Tract 1o,the no thbound frontage road of [H-35. westbound frontage road of Loop This is likewise intended to be a four-lane divided Secondary Arterial, west proposed Road C on Tract I is proposed to connect Roe A to the east- undided along It is i roadway fOur w th Road nA,lsatisfies thapequiftment of theaDentoniTho oughfareyPia dforan is , Portion$ Of this roadway east-west Collector street leftthurnseon approaches to intersection., .ay be widened I to provide for protected increasing the ion Road D on Tract 1 will funct as the One-way circulation frontaga oad wof 1 ki35. On the a two-way accessibility of rho tract,. frontin6 Road D is planned as a four-lane undivided .-Louth end, it ends in a cul-de-ssc• Collector street, road • Road E on Tract 1 will seervclato connect ROld rse undivided CoDllectoh Similar to Road D. of [H-35. it will be • Road F on Tract It Art rial which would be extended north or hsof US-77, four-lane divided Secondary within the current 120-foot right-of-way to US-77 is scheduled for widening provide afour-lane divided highway, leaving space in the median for two future lanes, Roads B and P are shown totally illustrate the ability of this Project to on the property tb to align my be time of actual designp it all assure space for their construction- A'adreent own rs. Such alignments will be p possible yrsued and these toads to share right.of- way with encouraged, tRtPA, NALY&h~ The City of Denton uses the TranPlan n+onda lhias a tool ghwaysto To forecast assess the future traffic pretained demand on a 5• probable impact of u perform Inc.) was coded network of assumed roadways a HILLf a assignment on the basis tofthe following crieriatand~assumpt assumptions: a trnf st for 2010 i • Utilize the most recent total City network and land use foreca i • Modify the above: base condition to: proadways to roposed roads. include the level of CEof proposed + Enrich the coded network detail for HILLCREST ,000 squ k Substitute HILLCRESTCENTER's distributed p portionall to the proposed r AR's. residential deveopmet ~p 1~ ii wsr~ uaknenrcrnn,m 9 ' Y,idti,8!: ItbSCW%!.6R' The results of this assignment are shown on the following map in terms of forecasted vehicles per day (vpd) by roadway link, The volumes shown itiolude manual aj made to reflect slight variations in the roadway network, ?roposed road ways aresized innaccordance with the following thresholds: • Collector streets - under 12,000 vpd • Secondary Arterial streets 12,000 to 28,000 vpd p~ DCSTRIAN ACC'FSS AND CIRCULATION- I In keeping with the integrated mixed-use character of HILLCREST CENTER. a sizeable f portion of trips generated can be expected to be internally satisfied-- that is, trips have both their origin and destination within the development, A common example is office employees who go to a Center restaurant for lunch. Some of these trips can be pedestrian trips, handled by a network of pedestrian facilities which encourage walking from one land use to another. HILLCREST CENTER plans for sidewalks to be provided along both sides of all public roads on-site. In addition, individual users will be encouraged to provide a coordinated network of pedestrian ci,culation systems in their detailed plans, Connections to external pedestrian facilities are expected to be ; considered at the time of the detail plan review. ~ Conc(usions_ On the basis of the traffic impact analysis and forecast of 2010 traffic volumes, the following 4 conclusions are reached; • The proposed roadways will be c*puate to accommodate the anticipated traffic i I flows, • Provision of an east-west connection (Westgate extension) between Ronnie Brae and the property is important for traffic circulation and neighborhood protection reasons, • Additional ramps on IN-35 are desirable to serve the long-term needs of the toms planned Urban Center, Re ommsrtdrttions i. Traffic signals should be anticipated and planned for at the following locations, but be installed only in accordance with the Manaal on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), Such planning should Include the installation of conduits for signals at time of street construction. • (toad A at Road C • Road A at Road D • Road B at Road F • Road F at U,S, 77 • Loop 289 at northbound IH-35 frontage road R visrm liikno nA 1)1W.l4 ill i its n r 11311 y,44 a121 , i ~ ~ fat ~ ti 13ai 4~ ti+~3 13333 13313'" 1111 13h it a~a ~ z 1f11! NM fM3 h 1 /M31 i0 6661 f i E f11I cat Yia I is FORECAST 2010 IrRAF Al" , , 2. Special turn lanes should be considered at the following locations: • Iff-35 northbound frontage road at Road A and Road B • Loop 288 westbound frontage road at Road B • Loop 288 eastbound frontage road at Road A • Road F at US-77 northbound and eastbound 3, in the proposed project to reconstruct US-77, provision should be made to accommodate an intersection with Road F. The detailed alignment of Road F should attempt to provide as close as possible to a 90--degree intersection and/or turn radii with adequate visibility + areas. 4. Although frontage roads are planned along Loop 288, it may be desirable for early phase traffic circulation reasons, to allow Roads A and B to connect to the mainlanes of Loop 288, Such temporary connections should be made only after a thorough examination of the probable impact on Loop 288 versus other local stroets. This consideration should involve representatives of the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation (SDHPT), City of Denton, and Hilicrest Center. i 5, Truck traffic should be prohibited by ordfnnnce and signing on the existing north-south section of Westgate. This will be particularly important during early construction phases on-site to keep construction traffic out of this residential neighborhood, and to avoid destruction of this rural-type roadway. 6. The City of Denton should place priority on acquiring the right-of-way and programming the construction of the portion of Westgate within PD-J 15 between Bonnie Brae and the east boundary of HILLCREST CENTER. Construction of Road C should be done concurrently with the connection to Bonnie Brae, including improving Bonnie Brae at this connection. j 7. A northbound exit ramp on IH-35 should be provid.d near the south edge of Tract I This could be an additional ramp or a relocation of the, proposed ramr,, to Loop 288. If the relocation option occurs, the northbound frontage road between the ramp and Loop 288 should be reconstructed to FDHPT standards. { I 8. A coordinated plan for 1H-35 ramps to serve the total Ur:han Center area should be developed by the City and SAHPT with input from area property owners. 9. A provision to update this traffic impact analysis should be considered if development exceeds 5,300,000 square feet or if traffic capacity is exceeded pr;or to build-out. kvsocHix~.vn 1.i)M i2 pp~ 1 ~ ft~ w, . < ~ i'". ~ ..r_ .K `r~'' xr~'.:, ',W~~' f if 1 i rr' . .,9 I ~ ~Zs i 1"~~. ~ is F t r E •~~1 €E. ,jt, c l M Fr ~ti~L~ Z j, .,i ~til.r ~ .a. r J I ~6j ,}1ra', , r l`am' 1! ' ° i t ~ . r `1flkf ~ ,y.Xf~ k ~ ~ ~4y~~7ff ~itr~~~~ ~ X~ ~ r i ~ ' ~ •L ~ ~ ~t • x` ~ .Gl asu e'.. ~ ~ ` F~ ~z.~'"'~`+r ~~f~ccyL ` '+~fa i'71St.1f~ y_ `J rt ♦ , r i~.~.~ ~-r.. ~i! 1 i'~~ e ..t". ..r.r:' v•.ttv.., ~-d~z ..a]i.:.i.r.k.:x~wF:.~.~E ~ W _ a= ~ J:. >=Y iz I 1 i ' j,u ~ f r r i i i _ r f f ar e i ~ B f ¢ _ ~o X j► f'}G~~rnq Dear" i j2`'~ Y ° O Co J r J _ F~ i r r`9 e r i ~i-- t .~-y f ' , p~~►s Off' 1, -~'"ubin9 ~Br~•d9;~ - r Psrsc~nne/ Door -317 49 r 6 i-._ } I ; TI ~t :4 Tyre ry Y 21 1 r ~ • • ~fl 49 .C3c1f.~t~.~ of ~~•ti ~rdC r ~1 EIIIEZ 4r rx- MT t- I a[ 1 6- j t or • f ' i -rhks c D~scryn Mar,~s Tht fise~~irer+-~,ts:. F.. o Lim U►,; ~orrn fl~~'lol,ny ..Cnaric. t,' _ .7.0 MPH. - r ;s ~f - I All .r I I 11 71 , 1.. r•.: t~1 r . ~ t iAV' t'I at! r i` ~ t 1 I I r. v , ,r... r, r., ! ':r:. t .,.w w .L i!•r.: •I,~.e, 1. ♦.Z rV r"• \,J±: A.11t. yi rr' .L.i -/fr.;r, Mr .`,L"ic'. i. ~l: Y ~ i!.{,. }rr k,I 1`1'! v } y•a•.~,~: r'}'. Y1~414 r<. J'.r15 n.... f,4 1.}.. .i; }t - - - r 1.I t ~ - xy 4 4~ .1 , ArS, c -f.- .~fi.+.y~Ti/Xi'i SiLtt t'..il~e~Sesls u~i-✓ vk=~`i ^.~.k~ r/..fi.G~eLw:u~'JYayS~['sy~,s' ~5iiaA{~ 4 yr j F id: ~ \ r ,t r j.~.. nj, ~ 1~ ~ yJ i, f'~1 't:o:. ~ i. f ..3'. 1 '.-s . I,.r rl i ` ~ a+i .r.~a ~1. y i +ti ~..f, .;l 4 :{if l !-Gy , t 1 :9a, grJt~~i' ~~.'~T~:r"ra►4.wi€~C~b~t.'1111~'i~. t 1 f?r S i 7 + 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 ! SCI • ~ 1 1 1 d i f e A CA 1 C ~ CO~cJmnS . o N& A rN~ 00 r tk° stlz ~ ~ -~11 ale ~41e'r i D 44 js/ru 9a 9u 1s/eu ~yfN.. .,4a . 11 c33/f" 2~1e} ~~5f1 14 i 1 r ~ •1 ~ , 1 ~ 1 4U7%11~1/e 7, I ~I r 1 l I a 1 III ,'"t ~ 1 ~ 0 Ll t • I /r E/ ! 1 - _ i f=III-ill W ~ql ~fk 1= lee G 2r~,rr E, Pr7 I f I I ° j Column Peer i i T, 5°'1Ile- 0 0 ~=C7 .,.04 - OA i i to Ca/ufrrn ~ Ca'sJ~n ~ y/~ n~ E iJ JG dop Ca IB " E ~V, ej . e 4 .Y s~~ rr , , ♦ ;~f`. ~ ~ ~ t ~ 117 - ~ . ' 11 ; .r 11 UIP , ~ _ l _ ~Y 1! ~ ~ 1 V r' Y I~ ~L ~ ~ .-1 40 r I I 00, i III= II,I ,.111: III ^#4 =Ill 11111 I ~ 2 s I ~ ,~C j8 F WI i• 4 ~ ~i . 7f--_ ~ Col urnn P%er 4! ! I I r IIA 1 11 1 y~rl ~ ' T ■ eeCT Cush/or) r G r- ~ i 4 ~ p~L ' i ^e - ~ ~ r; f i i gemWMPW IM420 -l/x* y,..:,, 1., -,,.1 - .1, ~rri~,e,'vr_n~~eslla~~~~!►4.v1.A.rit~.y~cwr ~-.::p~it,~/z ~l~~ ~ti ~ _ - _ _ - _ _ . s-,~_ l~ J- I ti ~ 1 ~i r _`~i - 1 t G~#dift I ATTACHMENT 4 RANCHO VISTA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 5000 TR MKSGIVING TOWER DALLAS, TEXAS 75201 I June 6, 1991 j Mr, Frank H. Robbins ; Executive Director for Planning and Development City of Denton 215 East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Re: Hlllerest Center NvIghborhood Meetings 1 Dear Frank: In our work session with the Planning and Zoning Commission of May Sth, we agreed to meet with the Westgate neighborhood and discuss our zoning proposal. This letter summarizes what we have done in regard to working with the "neighborhood" so that our proposed zoning reflects their input. We feel the "neighborhood" has had a chance at the two meetings we've had to hear our proposal, to diwuss their concerns, and to work with us to further develop our proposal so that the Westgate neighborhood can support our proposal as it goes through the zoning process, f We had our first meeting with the Westgate neighborhood on May 21, 1991, Prior to the I meeting we hand delivered a meeting notice to each house in the Westgate area. (See attached list of owners.) A copy of the notice is attached, We had 31 people sign in at the meeting to discuss our proposal. (A copy of the "sign-In" sheet is attached.) At the meeting we presented our proposal and answered questions concerning several issues which were raised. The major issues which were discussed and about which the residents wanted further information are as follows: I, Screen along oyr _joint arogpnv line, We presented two options in our original proposal - landscape or 6' high wail The consensus among the residents attending the meeting was for a 6' high brick will, but they wanted to anderstand the deslgn of will and the location, Z Retention Pond at South end of our property, Generally neighbors in the vicinity of the retention pond wanted to know what type of pond (dry or wet) it would be and wanted to know if we could move it further west, 3, T,raffjEon Westgate: Questions concerning traffic impacts on Westgate Drive were asked and we agreed to discuss our Traffic Impact Study at the next meeting, 4, Exngncion of transi ion area. A request was made for us to review the "transition" area boundary and to see if further protection could be incorporated into the proposal along the western edge of the transition zone (of particular concern was industrial buildings). t c d"u u,+am, i t ,t ME 1 N,o • rain:..+,.• Mr. Frank H. Robbins -2- June 6, 1991 We agreed to investigate these issues further and set up another meeting for June 4th at which time we would report our findings in regard to these issues and answer any further questions concerning our zoning proposal. We conducted our second meeting with the Westgate residents on June 4, 1991. A copy of the meeting notification we distributed in the neighborhood as well as a "sign-in" sheet is t attached. We had 25 people at this session. We presented our findings on the issues identified at the prior meeting. These are summarized on the attached exhibit titled "Transition Plan". These issues and the discussion related to each are as follows: 1. Screen along our joint oronerty line We showed colored slides of existing "brick wails" in Plano, Richardson, Dallas, and Irving. These wails screen residential areas in these cities. We presented our "wall design standard" which is attached. This standard Is the City of Plano standard for a 6' high brick screening wall, Our research l shows this to be an appropriate design solution for our situation and the residents prefer a "brick screen" rather than a landscape screen. The exhibit "Transition Plan" shows the extent of the wall (it runs along the property line between our property and the Westgate subdivision), The 6' high wall would be built in total, prior to any building construction on our property which lies south of Westgate Road. We will t maintain the wall in a proper manner. Our Westgate neighbors in attendance did not express any objections to the above "screen wall design". We indicated we would present this screen wall proposal to the P&Z at our public hearing, 2, Retention Pond at south endof our nroaerty. Our engineers presented a revised location and configuration for the Retention Pond. The "Transition Plan" drawing` shows this change. There were no objections to this revised location and we agreed to present the revised location in our P&Z hearing, 3. Traffic on Westgate. Our engineers discussed the findings of the Traffic impact t Analysis in regard to Westgate. t: The north-south portion of Westgate Is on the City of Denton thoroughfare plan as a i; collector street, which means its ultimate development would be a 60' right-of-way with 44' pavement. Our traffic Impact study shows forecasted traffic In year 2010 to be 3,022 vpd, which is significantly lower than the forecasted 15,000 vpd on the connection to Bonnie Brae or the 20,000.25,000 vpd on internal Roads A and B. The need to restrict truck and construction traffic on Westgate was also discussed and we concur, 4. Pxnansion of transition area. After studying the questions raised at the first meeting we proposed to expand the buffer area concept to the west of Tract 1F shown on our original Development Plan. This additional buffer Includes the following: In an area 200' west of the 300' transition line as well as Tract I-E, we will not , allow any industrial building and there will be a 2-story maximum height limit on all development In these areas, This proposed expansion of the buffering concept is shown in detail on the "Transition Plan" drawing, After discussion there was general agreement about this proposal and we indicated we would Include this in our presentation at the P&Z hearing.. a.utta~w,~~u,w I t 1 9Q1a9v5 1 ~ .f L 1 Mr. Frank H, Robbins -3- June 6, 1991 Frank, I've attempted to summarize the extent or our meetings with the neighborhood, their concerns, and our response to those concerns. We feel we've had some good meetings. We want to be good neighbors. We've encouraged them to come to the Planning and Zoning meetings as well as the Council meeting and voice their opinions and ideas. We feel, for the most part, we have their support. If you have any questions or need further Information, please let me know. Sincerely, i Don Dillard F skw Attachments i~ i ~ i i i GbY1lXIRYnMAd I rarrah S e>rc+'a0 t E WISTgill RESIDENTS NAME ADDRESS PHONE NQMER 565-9351 1. Lynn Knight 3100 Darby Lane, 76201 2, Kenslow 3101 Darby Lane, 76201 382-2050 3. D. MoFarling 3105 Darby Lane, 76201 387-6193 4. R. D. Wilson 3106 Darby Lane, 76201 382-5022 5, B. Travis 3111 Darby Lane, 76201 383-4086 6, K. Green 3118 Darby Lane, 76201 383-1303 7. J. Garvin 3127 Darby Lane, 76201 382-6102 I`k 8. E. Moazami 3128 Darby Lane, 76201 I 9. Marino 3201 Darby Lane, 76201 10. Marino 3205 Darby Lane, 76201 $k 11. Rausch 3206 Darby Lane, 76201 387-5635 12. J.T. Thompson 3211 Darby Lane, 76201 13. Vacant 3212 Darby Lano, 76201 _14. Thompson 3217 Darby Lane, 76201 387-1456 15. R. Shepard 3221 Darby Lane, 76201 16. R. J. Madsen 3222 Darby Lane, 76201 17. T. Mitchell 3227 Darby Lane, 76201 387-4246 565-8277 f 18. B. White 3228 Darby Lane, 76201 382-95 1 19. G. Stuckey 3900 Darby Lane, 76201 20. B. Saffron 3306 Darby Lane, 76201 566-5173 21. saffron 3310 Darby Lane, 76201 22. J. Saville 3311 Darby Lane, 76201 366-5173 23. G. Fischer 3316 Darby Lane, 76201 566-2789 24. Vacant 3317 Darby Lane, 76201 387-0715 25. J. McCormick 3321 Darby Lane, 76201 3874163 T. Moore 3322 Darby Lane, 76201 26 27. Vacant 2900 Barrow Drive, 76201 382-9529 28. R. Johnson 2922 Barrow Drive, 7,6201 887-1417 j•, 29. M. Lewis 3101 Westgate, 76201 566-2417 30. J Duryea 31Q9 iiastgaLe, 76201 366-0072 Al. Rick Woolfolk 3121 Westgate, 76201 X32. Lae 3201 Westgate, 76201 302-2747 _I t 33. Mrs. Crate Hail 3211 WesgatG, 76201 566-0¢36 E: 34. J. Jenkins 3221 Westgate, 76201 566-1927 -35. J. Harvey 3301 Westgate, 76201 F, 36. D. Jacoby 3311 Westgate, 76201 387-4976 37. W. Williamson 3321 Westgate, 76201 387-0348 38. D. Wall 3327 Westgate, 76201 39. Melvin Harr 2901 Fladger Drive, 76201 387-5139 40. J. T. Hawk 2917 Fladgelr Drive, 76201 $65-1981 2921 Fladger Drive, 76201 382-9474 41. $am McCombs ~7 T ~Y• 1 rs:~aYY i OKFiN 7 911 S90 iI L .J Barrow Drive V1 "~~~~lll ~ a II ~ n ~ n r n o (I i o I ti J ~ 1 I n 111 i d n I , i I Candy Lane „ q b I~ ~ f I $ ~ n 9 Fiadger Oflve rioi ~ l9~i 260t III ~Iin '0..,i - i 1 1 N 3m1 3106 llli 21 3401 3101 an 7U 34x1 17aT 21 _ Darby Lane sit* irol'' 311 li 110/ T ii;i »i:`" laai' 1100 1 1 I 9301 J310 1Nwv 3sta ` 1 ~ co o ........J 1'0l Dw =1 1 1 1111 ' _ 14N 1301 1311 1311 1 T a 1 E F I I 5 s RANCHO VISTA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 5000 THANKSGIVING TOWER DALLAS, TEXAS 15201 May 15, 1991 Dear Westgate Reside»-'.: My name is Don Dillard and X work for Rancho Vista Development Company. Over a year ago wp purohased the lRnd on the west side of your neighborhood, between you and I.H. 35. Recently we submitted a zoning application to the city of Denton for that 13nd. E Our desire is to be good neighbors, in this regard, we invite you to a meeting to discuss our proposed zoning plans with you and solicit your ideas, We want to work with you and gain your support for our proposal The meeting will be at the "Western Sizziin" Steak House at 2000 W. University, Tuesday evening May 21, 1991 at 74400 PM. I look forward to meeting with you. If you cannot attend or have any questions, please feel free to call me at (214)922-1066. f Yours 4DD' Donaldrd Vice President is DDD:td i r kw31R1Y i RANCHO Vim DEVELOPMENT COMPANY M THANKSC31ViNG TOWER DALLAS. TEXAS 75201 i i ♦1 May 29, 1991 r t is Dear Westgate Resident: i~ T would like to remind you of our second meeting in regard to our zoning application on the property to the west of your II neighborhood. At our first meeting on'May 21Str,-we' scheduled our second meeting for 7;00 PM,'Toesday, June 4, 1991 at the "Western Sizzlin" at 2000 W. University. Well look forward to seeing you there. If you cannot attend or have any questions, pl"me feel free to call as at (214)922-1065. Xourw truly, ~V Donald D. Dille Vice President: DDDstd F? 1 3 il:,:ld`t ~'/u.c~~sr c~urE,e Ne~g~~o-her Mcef;~~ S~~Q+ Qddresa - ~onc 11 l0 ~viP:lal,sn4 aunt-,s l o o 4' 40++ ~C /1'iU/ S jf~ /►'j SC'4/sr is 5 p 2/ f«a F c~:r i 2 C Z.: 3Sr3- 703 c0 Cro r 33 ri b .S1 6- ~(o5rr, 00 Ja~t. 3 9S f ~'Ytir' d LT~ ae, ~ 3 3 z. z 1~.~'..t>6 M ~ 3$ 7 , 3411, /.HVotj"-J-)vVaYuJ & . 1 tl a rr j ' s•4.4t . (L~s~+~e ~/e,ghbcrhax! NteCfing N~ llCres f Center done ddd~ess 3 87'31 ~ D _ r/IICHI~I=L ~~EbRG1A K6USLaW 31et A~►~BV 3$"~~~a~+s n . Co tint ~1`C`~ 6(p~ - l 3 6 3/aQ -e. b -3 9- T~I 38 3 3 1,L7 A,~47 3 13-13 0-7 _ _ ,--..}y~,,• . `n~~►•~-''fa~.Z - . dab ~,G `S/fi3 ~A . A4 4~, 39 3 t 't , I ~~SR.arxF" } i+ _ . Z14y'C'C1U6Uii{ } 1V. VVnn , J,7Ltyyb vyl,~yJI ,I,VI VA Iv IJvVN1tl IVLV 1 J-LV--J1 L T=co?m can IMTEI; ,ras~ss z wm, XlfC. 16980 DAU" PARVAT SUX" 100 p;LVA,AN TELB 7YY4i (214) 248-7476 1MAr fiS (214) 248-1414 - UUCOFx FIWE DZLTM T8Z VoLiOWM mass TO Fwr 922-1060 Don D111ard nag s yam, Hunt Petroleum Company ' i;" AD3SYaS8f - s r. CY'1'Z/STA7E r ZIl sue, . f n=_ Mike Clark io= NUN= 07 ?AM t 3 (naTuassa 009 PAGE) Agra: _5128/91 races JOEs-, As NMI XDZecss RSs City of Plano Screening 11a1_ D*tails I _Retl i!!'s Phone ilo 2200 i I I.. 1 V Toll no NOT uXmSYV ~t ABM 'F/ryyp8 6yps,MU r,AU SEBDEE AT TIM ABM NI/ ~~tJy~ ~ ■MYn- j i 1{ie IFih'i1 fi I tea . - . . r..rrvv.. i140LG1VJi~1N L 1 F 1 M i 1 i. f 1'4' 1! Illy 1 r NI Nrr•1 IIMI NNtt1~MN1 I ~ ~ 111 /nX11Nr I q'ulllpl im ulliiil P`NI WON 1'l/RI 1 Mlpt~~~ 11.{r. uf1 '1 NN N N'MlIm L ll'~111I HIM N11 aNNN IIIIHI I 1 f' . TYPICAL WALL S OOLUMN LAYOUT PLAN *M I~r11Y 1'11{ MAIL 1141 Nd1 kIN/M .1' i., •1~ fo y M/f11 I Nm1 Ally IN nit.rn IINN U(NIt4 - His. lINI t41 Itlfi t`T jj IF -If-4 ~IWI W NAM ~ IM iM1 t j 1'Nl/ql IN1rf,.V/~ 111. 1.~ ul'M-~ ,.I 1'1I1111N11tN Pit ' 111 1 1'• f ell ELEVATION 1 T • rr.nr~• n~TV yYIVVV IR V to 1 u0. "I I h Ilan l yl 14' 0 IXUIt ml 4'II 11 MItIIl I/ /1 Ilnt/ d. I 1' IW111 IIf1111 1111 t1H IBnl •^pi~l-10 X041111 n7{y~~A.4 IL time (ltll r^~ / f 1 n11MR n1/. MOM, 11111 y J. 11110"116111 Pill. illil' 101 1111.41 1 14 ,y I. t N ftq! hf Poll ll it 11111• n 1141 S I"ulir. ,~yy--~ It1U I ~Nf~ n0.1 1f hau n1N111k,4 I' I IIn1 n. P ^ i e it $141 Illt oil job" - 11 lI1 1 ~ I L1.1111111 Wilt 11' 11 1111511 1111 Nlf l<1j I I l 111!11 1J1N U to Rlillll. ~ t w W E' m C FOUNDATION DETAIL ' 1pi1+1NII1Vitt tit N111t lye . L~1 tnlth f IWO: 1 4 yN I~~yIM {NI.1wIy1 `gillM~IWhtWV, I"#pM W gNlll I IN gWti~p"Il'N ~r~ 1'M~Illlt ,lffl Mil to1. "OWM/I t1 tlllt MN 4 Munn W}!! +"11 1w N Iwt1/a1M J.11ne a "I 1 iierL" t w w uwo ■ wr eu it M 1. + e + p1't11.~1~y' t1li~4i111w'1q"l~t"~f;t N Room ' e MNfN~ IN11 M1t/11i11W1~1/11. t4i11t 11M1~WM 4. 11 M11 WW" JI am 1NIffY INI tMMI M R Mln M'~Y byy V.: X R rig l RIM 1 r~~l I s I 31 . f{L I~~t 011'Y Ti~tlf4 1' A 0 p 4 1YAMDAItD CONtSR{ nft DJMtL# ' /A FROM" ~ L ~►vn i 4 ra•. I r a-Vii"s2k: 1 II \ ` 11 ~ \ „ ~ II II 1 1 1 ~ I I 1 1 . i F I I 4 I I V I I-_ II if L } I I i + 11 ~ 1 i I ~ ~ {I .I 91AOP3D ` I I71 !i i I 1 f ii R r.._.. ~ i , rs . all. r, it i• I A►~ _ I 41 , 1j weK HNJ CR[87 CENYER AM'I91 tA%AA Aoww TRANSITION PLAN "'e.~.. .ate"~Yrti.n. 1 t j ATTACHMENT 5 j EMBIT B DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR HILLCREST CENTER 1, Relationship to the Master Plan This property is located in the expanded "Urban Center" at the node created by the interchange of 111-35 and hoop 288 in northwest Denton. Urban Centers are strategically located to encourage the concentration of commercial, retail, office, light industrial, and multifamily housing. These centers are intended to serve as the hub for economic activity and employment. According to the plan, the northwest urban center should be approximately equal in size to the southeast center by the year 2010. F 2. Slze of District i The district has 246,8 acres, } 3. Terms i E Terms used in the Development Plan shall have the meaning as defined in the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, uniass defined in this Plan. 4. Ordinance Governing t This District and Devekpment Plan are approved in accordance with, and shall be governed by, the provisions of Article W, Chapter 35, of the Code of Ordinances. I. i, , g. Permitter! Useg The following general uses and cornhnadirr of uses are permitted, A detailed list of Permitted and Prohibited Uses is attached as Table B•1, subject to the additional j limitations: (1) that only office uses are permitted on Tract IF adjacent to the exisungr I Westgate neighborhood; (2) no industrial building will be pesinitted within five hundred (500) feet of the west boundary of the existing Westgate subdivision; and (3) that no Industrial building will be permitted on Tract IE, A. Retails Any establishment whose primary purpose is to provide goods and i services to the general public for their use or consumption, The permitted use shall exclude residential urea. B, Commercials Any proposed use or proposed mix of uses, including multiple dwelling unit development and hospitality uses. Multiple dwelling unit development is permitted only when approved in conjunction with and apart of commercial development The hospitality uses will provide j L 1 Development Plan - liillcrest Center Page 2 t i facilities which offer transient lodging accommodations to the general public and which provide additional services such as, but not limited, to restaurants, meeting rooms, and recreation facilities. Uses such as hotels and motels and cunvention and meeting conference facilities will provide support for the office, institution, and manufacturingtdistribution uses in i 1 the district. C. Office; Office type uses with support retail facilities servicing the 3 employees are encouraged as support for the manufacturing and i . commercial uses or as independent office developments which are well planned, amenity-oriented facilities for service, industrial, and institutionally related users. ; 1). ManuPaeturing; This classification permits the development of manufacturing land uses and excludes any residential land uses and the prohibited uses listed in this plan for the business and industrial park I 1 area. This classification encourages dean manufacturing, assembly and i warehouse, and distribution type facilities. E. Institutional: Governmental, ecl cationai, medical, and cultural facilities are compatible within the business and industrial park, except for residential uses and those prohibited uses listed in this Ordinance, F. Recreationali The manufacturing, commercial, and institutional uses , may have recreational facilities to support the health and welfare of employees. These types of recreational uses are permitted if they are developed In conjunction with the open spaces and intent of the overall planned development, G. Farm and )Stanch: Farming, ranching, and agricultural type activities are permitted in the district, H. Accessory Uses: The use of land or a building or portion thereof customarily incidental and subordinate to the principal use of the land or building and. lucated on the same lot with such principal use are permitted, I 8. R»hibited Uses Specific prohibited uses are shown in 'fable B-1. i 7 Moveloymept %andardo Development standards, area regulations, and development density for individual parcels relating to each of the uses permitted in the district are shown as follows, Table B•2 correlates each of the permitted uses to a specific development standard, N VIYfA\I{Illcnl.xall\b I7NJ.10 i 115".?R:51y i ,{I~yg93{] i i r Development Plan • liillerest Center Page 3 i A. Retail: The development standards, area regulations, and development intensity for property designated for retail use shalt be as follows: 1 Minimum lot area None Minimum lot width None Minimum lot depth None Minimum Front yard setback 25 Ft. Minimum Rear yard setback 10 Ft. Minimum Side yard setback 10 Ft. I' Corner lot requirement 25 Ft. Maximum building height 45 Ft. Maximum lot coverage 50% Maximum llooi to area ratio 0.8:I I Parking As listed for each permitted iise in the Denton Zoning Ordinance B. Commerolal: The development standards, area regulations, and development intensity for property designated for commercial use shall be as follows: Minimum lot area None Minimum lot width 150 Ft. Minimum lot depth Nona Minimum Front yard setback 25 Ft. Minimum Rear yard setback 10 Ft. Minimum Side yard setback 10 Ft. Corner lot requirement 25 r, t. Maximum building height 20 Stories Maximum lot coverage 5096 Maximum Floor to area ratio 2:1 Parking As listed for each use in the ' Denton Zoning Ordinance C, Ofiieei The development standards, area regulations, and development intensity for property designated for office use shall be as follows: Minimum lot area None Minimum lot width None Minimum lot depth None Minimum Front yard setback 25 Ft. Minimum Rear yard setback 10 Ft. I Minimum Side yard setback 10 Ft. f ' Corner lot requirement 25 Ft. Maximum building height 20 Stories Maximum lot coverage 50% Maximum floor to area ratio 2:1 Parking 1 SP/300 SF of door aria (1) (1) 1 space/250 SF for clinics or Doctors' offices. ! R vi8rMNnknLKmHN9I0. to 1 1011 i Z. f c i I j Development Plan - Hillcrest Center Page 4 r gulations, D. Manufaoturing: The development standdards,M~area rej ufacturing use shat development intensity for property designated be as follows; Minimum lot area 3 Acres r Minimum lot width 200 Ft. Minimum lot depth None ( r i Minimum Front yard setback 25 Ft. Minimum Rear yard setback 10 Ft. Minimum Side yard setback 10 Ft. 25 Ft. Corner lot requirement s' f . Maximum building height 42 FUI) Maximum building coverage 769'0 i Maximum floe)r to area ratio 1:I Parking 1 SP/1000 SF. of floor area (1) i (eight may be increased by I foot above 42 feat for each 1 foot of j setbacks, up to a i trncresse in the front, side, and rear yard maximum of S stories, ~I E, Institutional: The development standards, area regulations, and development intensity for property designated for institutional use shall be as follows: ~ I Minimum lot area None Nona Minimum lot width None minimum lot depth Minimum Front yard setback 26 Ft Minimum Rear yard setback 10 Ft. Minimum Side yard setback 10 Ft. Corner lot requirement 26 Ft. Maximum building height 46 FLU) Maximum lot coverage' Maximum floor to area ratio 2:1 Parking 1 SP131)D SF. of floor area front, sidelanfoot d reareya46 feet for rd setbarltsh up foot to a (1) He ease in the increased maximum of 20 stories. I F, Setbaoks: The following setbacks shall control over any other specified I setback: 1) The minimum rear and side yard setbacks shall be twenty (20) feet for any land use abutting a multifamily zoning district or property used for a multifamily dwelling. L C~ d R VISTA\HI1knt,"0198.10 { f Development Plan - Hillcrest Center Page 5 , j 2) The minimum rear or side yard setbacks shall be twenty (20) feet i for any land use abutting the existing single-family Westgate neighborhood. 3) Along the IH-35, Loop 288, and US-77 frontages, a minimum forty- foot (40') building setback is established. Within this forty-foot (40') area, the first twenty (20) feet adjacent to the highway shall be l designated as a utility easement. Parking shall be prohibited within this twenty (20) foot utility easement. G. Development Intensity: The overall density of development shall be subject to the following limitations, ( 1) North of Westgate (parcel 1 of Tract I, plus Tract 11) - 149.40 acres Overall cumulative maximum FAR 1.5: 1 Individual site maximum FAR As governed by above development standards, but in no case greater than 2 : 1 ( 2) South of Westgate (Tract I, Parcel 2) - 98.38 acres Overall cumulative maximum FAR - 0.75 : 1 Individual site maximum FAR As governed by above development standards, but In no event greater than 1 : 1 Tract IF transition zone - maximum FAR for the tract's gross area shall be 0.3 : 1 { H, Height: The maximum height permitted in the district shall be twenty (20) stories, subject to the following additional limitations; Maximum heights for Individual land uses shall not exceed those shown in the above development standards for ` Individual land uses South of Westgate ten (10) stories maximum Tract IF transition zone one (1) story maximum Within the portion of Tracts IC aad ID that is five hundred (500) feat west of the existing Westgate neighborhood, no structure shall exceed two (2) stories in height Within Tract IE, no structure shall exceed two (2) stories in height. 1, Denton Airport Zoning Regulations: All buildings and structures within the district shall also be subject to the height limitation of the Municipal Airport Zoning Regulations and federal regulations. 4 C~ q V:9rA\FillknG8x6\t1i8.10 ' i- ,7.. t , Development plan • Hillcrest Center page fi J, calculations of FAR: l ark'ng facilities shall not be included in calculating floor to area ratios. y K Road Alignments. Adjustments in the location of roads shown on a or plan may be made without amendment of this plan if "Pro detail plan. All public roads shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City of Denton design criteria and construction standards ; t j in effect at the time of detail plan approval. I t and Signs; The ' abons of the Denton L. Landscaping, Trees, approval of this plan, shall Landscape Code in effect on the date of the aPP1Y to the district. L' n wall, six (6) brick screeni M. Westgate Neighborhood Buffer/Screen: go and wesged6e of the ; } feet in height, shall be provided along the existing Westgate neighborhood, which shares a common boundary with S prior this district. This screening wermishall be corwtrwted IA its 1for the construction ofea~ny bu building to the issuing of a building p a south of Westgate Road, It shallmeet exceed the g °W of (see attached Standard Details for Thin Wall Brick 2 Paragraph 9D). there is no public N. Pedestrian Access and UnWations Presently, ) adjacent to eny pedestrian access/eirculation system (esiSW* appu p~e~ system portion of the district's boundary. ' develops adjacent to the district's bovndarl prior to approvai of aydetaiil plan on property within the district neA to the public pedde d~ by an exten ' .such public pedestrian system will be recogni along both constructed development within the district. Sidevreillts will be meandering sidewalks sides of all public roads within the district. Use within easements outside public ,ight4 of-way will be pern+i { Q ~rti..*pn Tmgapt pnaivsis A traMc impact analysis has been prepared and submitted o,n t e basis Denton may development within the district of 5,300,000 square analysis under require the preparation and submission of an updated traffic impact either if the following conditions; ton on such . If any on•site or adjacent public roadway, or controlled Intersect roadways, reaches a traffic flow level which exceeda capacity (defined as worse than Level-of-Service (LOS) C). square feet. Requested development would exceed 5,300,000 t' Iff H VISTA\IINIM~tiRN\8196.10 ~7 YdS;Y?• y~ I I IY&WA 1 I Jog I 3 r ~ if ,I Mole i. `..i , .rn vY "low J .roY . wa'r I I ~ E~ , ~ PROPOSED ROADS IA r1 l ' .;y f.r:titr~ 1 .l.4'L1YMiIf:G'H••eI:MI.FIM41A9.... d!MVfYI:./r...9.R.Wi...~~..: 1 I j •ax k is • V[MSl 1, 1 I A ! r PROPOSED USES 14~ m". 044 S:mN A«M F 06 Um "solo I'm 1F 7 N1Nw anw NMMI !LL' Coo 30 I p.:U{ CCinlRwRi 10MWMw Ilil q„µ, ~ -0.7 Gnl«I~ I W' 0yn 11 ~ . 7i I ~7 1~QQ p lhilf ? low ' f0 IF MMIW A~« 70 NMM i 10.77 i Al.d..n by N YM. NI1iNi17101. mo~1M,71. ~v* i ~,wl, ~sid.1M~IM ,4 ~ vlif. lM vM 1y I W I n "r: ".1't 1 W4 IIMIAd WrAy! .M b. 1N M ..~f [ M .n N. r«uR1..r n«b a e.t p .h(M "iN«. .Iw~'eoF pN w IM .l.1 N.nsxy b YI. l./Nti! RwlNl. n.y~►w4.e~. Icy,. ItOAD T rM MWJ A71a1M - r- saw L.J __f DEVELOPMENT PLAN -PLC * I ~~~r~A WM~tWAWI - I 4':r rMAI r f I II ~ ~ ' II k M W "I I Kk" I II o4el I I 10 it 1 I ~i 1 4N i f ~ f I r ~I ~ f }I_.._ I r I r I ~ I ~ I i t i I ~ 1 I r~ it r' ~ 4 I ~ I ~r rl r i wu_ AMA- ~ I ~ I ~ i# i~ pr I I ~ --I I I1 r ~ 01km crop hh! lrac~ \ I ~ I i Ep I~ .J I ~ naor t \ I pi it w i ~ r M. LMAfANI ~1 I s "'11}x" lNLLCR!>:1' WINTER TRANSITION PLAN r 1 4iJ!Y.'I i~flYl r 1 a r PUT t till !iq sit t / fig r ~ j i O { 2bftWW1KM f . 111111/11 MA 1.11111 U1 MA ~ y i h j Y i J I T,lu r,r 1 4r t Il lir P1111 ~I' 1 wlll INI M'Yk NMY rIH N tluu 1 I. IwY4 YNN1 up 1I11~1Nq 5 r W No 14 aw,llaas^~ ~Ir 1M t ~,;IwrN NM I.1.9"mom 1 1 1N1MM N11 •~F .W 1~ / MMI I IwNN IIY Iw11N.~NI 111 1 NwlWUwlYN1NV nn /w~l•. i 1 pll'I ~1l1~M11 /lwu N AAI i 1` ~'y 1 ItI~1+lYnwlawlrY ~I NMN M•1 01, I . = K014 FII 1.161m II IY Ni IINYI wW1~N1•1'. INII MITI NN 111110 S 1 11104 y111 M wi MNlll. MINI "F`6 CA 1AWWWA44 • FOUNDATION O[YAIL a~ MIN N try r+• +A trl MI M NIIII 1~ '1VJ1 01111 1 1WNN YYI No I wW NYYWY NNINI N "IN WN / NG'x' t1lAkJ'Z11'1r~r6 NN1 rM0w111 4 , 6% Ny 1. 1{ (1 M NM N SINN I IIIII M 1 Nr N♦Y/I{IIIr~y OY►1Nrw ~FY`N~,w~i N1IMIr1~lr 1 Yt MW F N NW I ~IIINN1tY1I IM, NM I N. N. E. 1MN WWIN 1 M 1 w 11111 t wN111I1 I. f r %XI-M 1 N MINI INMN il, I I C1fYF,4C ~l~Yt~A1 1' AfMAY Ml 0 WIN ITAMD Al10 tAMIt/WCTION. OtTmo 4LIVATION PAY44 urla4a 1 NIIi W i I{N i TABLE B-1 HILLCREST CENTER "BUSINESS USES" PERMITTED PROWSITEO LAND USES PRIMARY 4SIDEAMA i7SE$: ONE•FAMILY DWELLING OETACHED X ONE-FAMILY DWELLING ATTACHED X TWO-FAMILY DWELLING x MULTIPLE-FAMILY DWELLING OR APARTMENT i COMMUNITY UNIT DEVELOPMENT X DORMITORY, BOARDING OR ROOMING HOUSE X HOTEL OR MOTEL x TRAILER CAMP OR MOBILE HOME PARK x ,E t ' ,4 '~,~°'erv3 , ra ms5°k{'x'c~`m,r e al`"P e EvucA rtvnW~ms~~~~ ..x. ART GAL LE WY OR MUSEUM X i CEMETERY OR MAUSOLEUM X.. CHURCH OR RECTORY~~.~~__Y X j COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY OR PRVATE SCHOOL X COMMUNITY CENTER (PUB'.IC) _ X OAY CAMP x DAY NURSERY OR KINDERGARTEN SCHOOL FAIRGROUND 0 EXHISITION AREA X FRATERNITY, SORORITY, [awe OR CIVIC CLUB x GROUP HOMES x x HAL AY HOUSE HOME FOR CARE OF ALCOHOLIC. NARCOTIC OR x PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS x HOSPFTAL GENERAL ACUTE CARE} HOSPITAL (CHRONIC CARET x INSTITUTIONS OF RELIGOA OR PHILANTHROPIC NATURE x LIBRARY (PUBLIC) x MONASTERY OR CONVENT X i NURSING HOME OR RESIDENCE E AGED x OCCASIONAL SALES i PUBLIC PARK, PLAYGROUND OR MW CENTER x SCHOOL, PRIVATE PRIMARY SECONOARY PUBLIC SCHOOL 0 OENOMMUITIONAL SCHOOL x i SCHOOL, BUSINESS OR111IWE x i i h`J 1 of 6 IssP; ~ t] P I tW! HILLCREST CENTER "BUSINESS USES" PERMITTED PROHIBITED LAND USES UTILITY, AGC~ssony, ANp INCtneNT 4LU$E9 X INQ X ACCESSORY SOLO COMMUNITY CENTER (PRIVATE) X ELECTRICAL GENERATING PLANT X ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION X ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION LINE X I FIELD OR CONSTRUCTION OFFICE ITEMPORARY) X E FIRE STATION OR SIMILAR PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING X GAS TRANSMISSION LINE AND METERING STATION HOME OCCUPATION X X LOCAL UTILITY DISTRIBUTION LINES X I I OFF • STRE E T PARKING I N CIOENTAL TO MAIN USE X PRIVATE UTILITY SHOP OR STORAGE YARD f PUBLIC BUILDINQ. SHOP, YAHV Ur X STATE OR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT M RADIO AND TELEVISION OR MICROWAVE TOWER X SEWAGE PUMPING STATION X SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT X SWIMMING POOL. (PRIVATE) TELEPHONE, BUSINESS OFFICE X L. TELEPHONE LINE & EXCHANGE SWITCHING OR X RELAY STATION WATER RESERVOIR iGROUND OR ELEVATED), WATER X PUMPING STATION OR WELL X S WATER TREATMENT PLANT TELECOMMUNICATIONS PORT 4 t t rJ h c,> ~ r "E5 ~y1 ~ Y)J~N ~ tat~(,y ,C q , S I L Y fl F. trA. !SI'f{JV/vnp`! t ' ~ lsi'~. :i~= `T „w, i AMUSEMENT, COMMERCIAL (OUTDOOR) X North of Wattgate N South of W"Vete X AMUSEMENT, COMMERCIAL (INDOOR) X COUNTRY CLUB (PRIVATEI WITH GOLF COURSE g J I DANCE HALL OR NIGHT CLUB X 11 DRAG STRIP OR 00 R.1 1 L RACING OO CART T RACK X GOLF COURSE (PUBLIC X GOLF COUFISE (COMMERCIAL) X PARK OR PLAYGROUND PUBLIC) X PLAYPIIED OR STADIUM PUBLIC) X RODEO t?ROUNDS ROLLER R ICE SKATING RINK X STABLE,°RIVAT CLUB X STABLE COMMERCIAL RENTAL X i STABLE, BOARDING X SWIM OR TENNIS CLUB X THEATER.0 IV 4N X { THEATER, OTHER THAN DRIVE•IN TYPE 2of6 4 ilea. aiNtFa ItRtIYA ' t i HILLCREST CENTER "BUSINESS USES" PERMITTED ITED LAND USES PROHIBr . t TRANSPORTA770lJ FtEG4Y iDdU$S', NELIPAq X 3. North of Westgate N South of Westgate X t BUS STATION OR TERMINAL X HAULING OR STORAGE COMPANY X i MOTOR FREIGHT TERMINAL X RAILROAD FREIGHTTERMINAL X RAILROAD PASSENGER STATION X 3 RAILROAD TRACK OR RIGN7.OF•WAY X t RAILROAD TEAM TRACK X t ' PARKING LOT (TRUCK) X PARKING LOT OR STRUCTURE (COMMERCIAL) AU7O,AAa81L~.SR1!1cFVSes x" AUTO LAUNDRY (CAR WASH) AUTO PAINTING AND BODY REPAIR X North of Westgate ~ South of Westgate AUTO SALES AND REPAIR (IN BUILDING) X A 0 WRECKING OR SALVAGE YARD X GASOLINE SERVICE STATION X NEW AUTO PARTS SALES STORES X NEW OR USED CAR SALES lOT (IN OPE X 2 I SEA COVER AND MUFFLER INSTALLI'TION SHOP X TIRE RETREADING OR CAPPING X E USED AUTO PARTS SALES tIN BUIU1grG1 1. I ~ I 1 3Of6 j t 1 a.t~thv £ls111:1~1~ 1 f' HILLCREST CENTER "BUSINESS USES" PERMITTED PROHIBITED LAND USES I R~rAI! AND SEfRVlC.T1'pF f1SE$; X ANTIQUE SHOP X BAKERY OR CONFECTIONERY SHOP (RETAIL) CAFETERIA X CLEANING AND PRESSING SMALL SHOP AND PICKUP X CUSTOM PERSONAL SERVICE SHOP X DRAPERY, NE ptEWORK OR WEAVING OP X FLORIST OR GARDEN SHOP X ' GREENHOUSE OR PLANT NURSERY (RETAIL) X HANDICRAFT SHOP X HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE SERVICE AND REPAIR X LAUNDRY OR CLEANING SELF SERVICE X j mime OdRAPH-STATIONER`.' OR LETTER SHOP X MORTUARY OR FUNERAi. PARLOR X OFFICES. PROFESSIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE X 1 OFF PREMISE SALE OF BEER ANWOR WINE X ON PREMISE SALE OF~f ORWING LICENSED PRIVATE CLUB X X PAWN SHOP RESTAURANT X RETAIL STORES AND SHOP X k RETAIL IN OPFICE &OGS, A MAX OF 2 ROSS AREA i STUDIO FOR PHOTOGRAPHER. MUSICIAN, X OF; HEALTH SE OINDHA~TORE, USED FURNITURE OR X i RUMMAGE SALE j TOOL OR TRAILER RENTAL SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESSES ANIMAL PC NO (PUBLIC OR PRI ATE) ANIMAL CLINIC OR HOSPITAL X (NO OUTSIDE RUNS OR PENS) X ANIMAL CLINIC, H gpITAL R KENNEL WITH OUTSIDE RUNS OR PENS (NOrth DI W*"Atr Iy X I a FARM OR RANCH OREENHOUS OR PLANT NUBS RY X HATCHER Y. POULTRY X LIVE3TOCK AU TION X LIVESTOCK FEEDING PLANT, PENS QR YARDS 4Of6 4 ya. 1 I u's,CYr.'+~ I I II195::\'.C HILLCREST CENTER "BUSINESS USES" PERMITTED PROHIBITED LAND USES COhfMERClAL ` ` BAKERY(WHOLESALE) x BUILDING MATERIAL SALES x CABINET AND UPHOLSTERY SHOP x CLEANING AND DYEING PLANT (COMMERCIAL) x CLEANING PLANT, BAGS OR CARPETS (SPECIAL EQUIPMENT} x CLOTHING MANUFACTURE OR LIGHT Sr. COMPOUNDING OR FABRICATION x E CONTRACTORS SHOP AND STORAGE YARD x t' ENGINE AND MOTOR RCPAIRING 1 (Mot within 500 feDt of Wastgele Subdivlslon) x FEED STORE x HEAVY MACHINERY SALES AND STORAGE (No( within 600 fast of Westgate Subdvtslon) x • JOB PRINTING OR NEWSPAPER PRINTING X LAUNDRY PLANT (COMMERCIAL} x ( MILK DEPOT, DAIRY OR ICE CREAM PLANT x PAINT SHOP x PETROLEUM PRODUCTS (PACKAGED) STORAGE WHOLE x PLUMBING SHOP x SAND, GRAVEL OR EARTH SALES 0(l STORAGE x SCIENTIFIC OR RESEARCH LABORATOAIE9 x STORAGE AND SALE OF FURNITURE OR APPLIANCES OUTSIDE A BUILDING x STORAGE OR SAL S W REHOUS x TRAILER RENTAL OR SALES (ExC Motolla Hot»u) x TRAN8FER, STORAGE AND BAGGAGE TEAM NAL WHOLESALE OFFICE AND SAMPLE OOM x NA,NA,gL FtESpIIRC'STC)RRQ s< r EXTRACTION AND BTORAGE OF SAND, CALICHE, f STONE, CLAY OR GRAVEL FOR COMMERICAL USE x PETROLEUM OR GAS WELL x PETROLEUM COLLECTING OR STORAGE FACILITIES x MINING OR STUPAGE OF MINING WASTES x 5Of6 f 71 i V;radr;i "Vl K.`YtF2s 1 HILLCREST CEWER "BUSINESS USES" PERMITTED PROHISITEO LAND USES Mf Ss~ Q Sr? EGIAC IIVDl1S7 ?IAL RRQCE$# ! ti, ASPHALT OR CONCRETE SATCHING PLANT X i BRICK KILN OP TILE PLANT X CEMENT OF.'1'f RATED LIME MANUFACTURE X I DUMP OR ° ARY FILL AREA X MIXING ANU oALE OF CONCRETE X OPEN SALVAGE YARD, FOR RAGS OR MACHINERY, ETC. X j SMELTER OR REFINERY X 1 + O~NI~A'1~ M,4NU~AC7tlAfNli ANb; rN. '~i~~~1~~ ,v 3 ; ~ 1 I , LIGHT MANUFACTURING OR INDUSTRIAL USES WHICH MEET THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS PRESCRIBED BY j ' 13, 18A, I THROUGH 7 X I HEAVY MANUFACTURING OR INDUSTRIAL USES NOT PROHIBITED BY LAW AND EXCEPTING THOSE SPECIFICALLY LISTED AS REOUIRING SPECIFIC USE PERMITS WHICH MEET THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS j PRESCRIBED BY 13, 188 1 THROUGH $ X ANY INDUSTRIAL USE WHICH OUE TO THE POSSIBLE EMISSION OF EXCESSIVE SMOKE, NOISE, GAS, FUMES, DUST, DOOR, VIBRATION OR THE DANGER OF FIRE, EXPLOSION, OR RADIATION AS MAY BE DETERMINED BY THE HEALTH, FIRE OR BUILDING OFFICIALS TO 89 t PRESENTLY, OR IN THE FUTURE LIKELY TO BE A HAZARD OR NUISANCE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OR THE COMMUNITY AT LARGE BUY WHICH MAY BE LOCATED L AND OPERATED UNDER SPECIFIC BTANOAIS X Rv*1A*AK4K*k1%%0 10 r Requftes public heart V with I required nolft9lon (as normally required for zoning) at time of Detau plan to approve use, 3 , I F 1 i 1 I f r~0 6 of 6 t i 1 fi(C:h 8v~ v. r J Applicable Development Standard TABLE 9-2 co = 'V C Permitted Land Use d A ~ a r_ W '{6 ~ w f6 ' Q U ~ L C ~ PRIMARY'RESIDFNTIAL USF5` x HOTEL OR MOTEL 'R;.' rs~r } <<'' EDITCATIONAI JNS.VMMINtiL2*052JAL~SES X i ART QALLERY OR MUSEUM x COLLEQE OR UNIVERSITY OR PRIVATE SCHOOL X COMMUNITY CEDITER (PUBLIC) X { I OAY CAMP CAY NUASERY OR KINDERGARTEN SCHOOL 1 I: NOME FOR CARE OF ALCOHOUC. NARCOTIC OR x PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS HOSPITAL IQENERAL ACUTE CARE, x HOSPITAL (C}JTJONfC CAAE) _ WSTITUTIONS OF AELIGlOUSOR PNILANTHAOPIC NATURE x S X LIBRARY (PUBW x NURSING HOME OR RESlOENCE HOME FOR AGED x I SCHOOL' PRVATE PRIMARY OR SECONCIARY I. S SCHOOL BUSINESS OR TRADE s t A r X U.xlL1TY.A66 CS~7A1":~` X x x x ACCESSORY BUILDING x COMMUNITY CENTER (PRIVATE) x 'I X -CTR )CAL SUBSTATION x ELECTRICAL T IAN; SM3S3)ON t~E (MMF Y) X IELD CR CONSTFIUCTION CFRCE BUILDIN4 X FIRE ST TION OR SIMILAR RING STATJCN x GAS TRANSMISSION LINE AJVO METE t LOCAL UTILITY OISTRIBUTJON LINES x X x x x OFF•STA ET PARKING I AL TO MAIN USE x PRIVATE V ILITY HOP OR STORAGE YARD x PUBLIC BUILDING, SHOP. YARO OF LOCAL X STATE OR FEOERAL OOVEHNMIE WAVE CM1ER x ' RADIO AND TELEVI ION OR MKiO SEWAGE PUMPING STATION x SWIMMING POOL (PRIVATE) X PHONE' BUSINESS O ICE x TELEPHONE INS & EXCHANGE SWITCHING OA RELAY STATION X WATER RESERVOIR (GA0MNO OR ELrO WA R x PUMPING STATION' OR WELL i LSCOMMUNICAT1ON5 RFCRL'ATIONAC ANO EN7841'~i x AMUSEMENT, COMMERCIAL IOUTO 1 x 1 AMUSEMENT, C MMBRCIAL ( X COUNTRY CLUB (PRIVATE) W LF COURSE x OANC HALL OA NIGHT CLUB x GOLF COURSE (COMMERCiAU X ROLLS OR ICE 3K TI RINK SWJM OR NNIS CLUB x f HEATER, 0TH R THAN CRIVE•IN TYPE of 3 i t e4v'. 4'~{ S». IJ f V k,.J Applicable Development Standard m C _ (6 3 Permitted Land Use m J 0 rL C z T.ANSPORTAroN: RELATED USE'S= HELIPAO x BUS STATION OR TER dINAL X HAULING OR STORAGE COMPANY X MOTOR FREIGHT T[gMINAL X x RAILROAD PASSENOEA STATION X RAILROAD TRACK OR RIGHT-OF•WAY PARKING LOT OR STRUCTURE (CotAMERCIAL} X X AUTaM091tE.SEAVICEUSES' U-1 0 LAUNDRY (CAR WASHI X ( AUTO PAWTtNG ANO 800Y REPAIR X l AUTO SALES AND REPAIR (IN BUILDING) GASOLINE SERVICE STATION_ X ' { NEW AUTO PA FIT SAES STORES X r f NEW OR SE) CAR SALES LOT (IN OPEN) X SEAT COVER ANO MUFFLER INSTALLATSON SHOP X l USED AUTO PARTS SALES (IN BUILDINGI ' RETAILAN0 'SEAflIGE71~USES X ANTIOU6 SHOP X BAKERY OR CONFECTIONERY SHOP (RETAIL) X ETERIA AND PICKUP CLEANING AND PR 9S1NG SMALL SHOP X CUSTOM PERSONAL SERVICE SHOP S1P X ORA,PERY, NEEDLEWORK OR X l , fl ORlBT OR GARDEN X GREENHOUSE OR PLANT NURSERY (RETAIL) X HANOICRAFT SHOP X }tOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE SERVICE AND REPAIR X LAUNDRY OR of am(NG SELF SERVICE SHAD X MIMEOGRAPH, STATIONERY O X X MORTUAR OR FUNERAL PARLOR X OFFICES. PROF BSIONAL AND ADMINI$TRATIVI3 O F PREMISE SALE OF Be ANpiOR WINE X ON PR MISE SALE OP BEER ANOJOR!MINE X LICENSED F RIVATE CLUB X PAWNSHOP X RESTAURANT X X { A Alt. STORES ANC SHOPS ~!.nEA . GR S Rgl AIL IN OFFICE SLOGS. A MAX N. DIO Pon PHOTOGRAPHER, MUgIOA IAN X ARTIST OR HEALTH SECONOHANO STORE. US 0 URNITU OR X RUMMAGE SALE OOL OR TPAILER RENTAL I j ' I r r„11 Applicable Development Standard rn ~ c permitted Land Use m 0 s 0. a W U O c z AQR(CULTURAZ:7YPE USES ANIMALCUNIC OR HOSPITAL. x (NO OUTSIDE RUNS OR PENS) ANIMAL CLINIC, HOSPITAL OR KENNEL x WITH OUTSIDE RUNS OR PENS (North 01 WW98 0 o(ly) x FARM OR RANCH X GREENHOUSE OR PLANT NURSERY comMERCIAt x BAKERY (WHOt 4SALE) X EiUILOINGM/'t ':.SALES x CABINET AN' r'FLTSTERY SHOP X CLBANiNG ANO OYF LNG PLANt (COMMERCIAL) I: CLEANWO PLANT, BAOS OR CARPETS x h (SPECIAL EQUIPMENT) CLOTHING MANUFACTURE OR LIGHT COMPOUNOINO OA FABRICATION ENGINE AND MOTOR REPAIA14a x IN01 within 500 f" of W M Subd~feiortl X FEED STORE H VY MACHINERY SALE5 Ai 0bn1 X x Not whMn 500 I" m W P*o JOB PRINTING OR NEWSPAPER PALNTINO X LAUNDRY PLANT ICOMMEFICW.> X MILK D POT, DAIRY 08 tC C PLANT x PAINT SHOP X PETROLEUM PRODUCTS (PA D) STORAGE WHafi X PLUMBING SHOP TORIES X III FIC OR RE ARCH x RAGE OR SALES WAR x TRAt R R AL OR S IPA TERYWALI x NS EA, ST AND X l YWHOLESAL.E OFFIC@ AND 9AMPL@ ROO f 'I GENERAL MANt1FItCn1A7N AN~lGtllRG1E CRSES LIGH, MANUFAC RINGOR INCUSTAIALUSESWHICH MEfii THE pflRFORMANCE STANDARDS PRESCAlow By x 18, IaA. t THROUGH ~ Mvnt«wMia~a ~o I , 3 of 3 I i I , 1k1ikK+' 1 c lifS`3r4. I P&Z Minutes June 12, 1991 Page 5 have a clear idea about what will go on the property and when. He can understand the concern of the residents, He moved to deny the petition. Motion failed for lack of second. Mr. Kamman paid that he can understand that there are some uncertainties but on the other hand, some of the residents moved concerns was t seconded by commend approval relieved of Zy91p003. Motion permits. to re Ms. Morgan. N, 4 Mr. Holt stated that he was on the Commission four or five years ago when the request came up to amend the PD on this property. A lot of residents were opposed and he voted against the change. That was a Pandora's box. This request is from a small church trying to find a place to locate. Architects are very expensive. His own small church spent , $50,000 on one. He also lives close to the Morman church and has never had or heard a complaint about it, The church will be a good buffer from some of the other uses in the ultind of agriculture use on this area. To would b any difficult. property Motion carried (4-1) with Mr. Engelbrecht voting no. IV. Hold a public hearing and consider amending the Denton Development Plan Concept Map on 99.9 acres from low center intensity area to Urban Center and moderate activity , and rezoning 245.8 acres of agricultural to planned development and adopting a development plan on property located in the northeast and southeast quadrants of 1-35 and Loop 288. Thirty-nine notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; one was received in favor and two in opposition. Staff Report: Ms. Feshari presented the staff report ' (attached). The proposed development plan is the second step of the three step zoning process and provides more detail than a general concept plan. Mr. Holt asked how the uses will differ from commercial zoning. Ms.'~eshari said that many of the standards are similar, if there is a proposed use, staff will look at the table of permitted uses, categorize the use, and it would have to follow the adopted standards for the district. Mr, Holt said that the City has tried to get away from straight commercial zoning, 1 WONPWA J ~`~`I ('J!F~ k Pan Minutes June 12, 1991 Page 6 DRAFT Ms. Feshari replied that she understood the problem with commercial zoning is the list of permitted uses, Some uses allowed should not be in a commercial district. She was unawara that there were any problems with setbacks in commercial zones. The development standards prepared for this case are similar to those done by The Perot Group and Henry S. Miller Company. There is a 40' setback off of I-35 In which staff is requesting that there be no parking. She reviewed "Exhibit B" and the table of permitted uses with the Commission. t Mr. Engelbrecht asked why petroleum and gas extraction would be permitted. Ms. Feshari replied that it is currently a permitted use. If they have oil under their property, they are allowed to drill for it. The Commission might wish to consider how close these wells should be allowed to the neighborhood. In booming times, oil wells were allowed near residences. She does not know if that created any problems. Mr. Kamman asked if there has been any coordination with the' i entryway plans. Ms. Feshari stated that the entranceway plans will come into play at the detailed plan stage. The actual entranceway plan is still being wi-itte.n. It will allow the same uses but make them more aesthetic. The sign regulations will also have to be complied with. If the entranceway plan is passed before the detailed plan stage, the Commission will be able to look at those regulations, but they will not take precedence over the development plan standards. Mr. Morris said that the adopting ordinance for the district could say that entranceway plans would apply. Mr. Holt asked if there is a problem having things grandfathered in under different ordinances. Mr. Morris replied that there is State legislatioii referring to vested right and regulations in effect at the time. A developer is bound by existing rules which cannot he ' changed but new rules can be added. It depends on what you are try;ng to regulate. Mr. ;Aolt gave the example of the entranceway plan forbidding used car lots. Mr. Morris said that once the table of permitted uses for this PD is approved, that use is okay; but the City has not approved a specific location for the car lot and can do that or choose not to at the detailed plan stage. i E t-~- - :vAln 4 - - WIT s S~ ~C.~`,,r'~:■. jeye[t tii 1~ rX`;`~ ' C l.r ~ "~e ! r ~ `F~t• `~f~ ' i i.. al. '2: r c1:. r :...3• i.., r.'': :.-,Y t, i,.'`.. ~ i~ie s.7... . ~ ~ Y."...^73%f ~lt^ :{"•2'~!Y,tA: ~.,'.Y!:Sf =d+M rr ~,wsr. htis+.~.n<tr .,a+rizl'','mss:a~,wi.+'v#x.Bi'llx~utsrmfif>~1,c.~t l a.a Gips ! ---,r- CMEhl r trlJaCco0cooDovvorpop; uocpo PhOWWW, n0 i ~ 1.71 -Io~p~l 131 41 p Ib~ I M p'~ntkdF~ rtw7►, ;EMERY STREET Mo C) T r t GPAS5 TnitqT r 110 R~vdMaae p[,~ /S r !ns 9d t 0 - 0 @ I c let ~I /3rAQSibrA~l`NRI' ~A~_ t~ ' GtekMdGow►;7►abt PSE RM r3 "1l.Y Rtz - b r ® I O k 18 j AO S I C 1 Al 'F f~i r VEhi C, up r J o = - r cErura : No ~ i r 1 s V 1!) 41 i i ~H•':vJn r~sM 1`` 11~1'IfiE ^~hM it: ; 1 ~ I r~ rri y = I air-- e s t- hT F T. s r>7- F s~ S' i 1 19 I k 14~ r ♦ i ~ Y. I i { 2f1 11c r,,' 3. ~rJ CE,urtl . t 1 i ! 1 l_ \ t6'c~rh ~ • 1 Vl~r+TPTIiT-4 AZ FA 1 ~IIX Y i r=OYEF. - } 0 ! i I r~ © D r' r ~J - - - 1 - IL t i i 1 - mod - - Ib(o ,i~ Ibfo~ ill 181G1 I0) I IB~~ !4 I i 1 u t 11 R` . 96 0 i j to iii ~i 1 t T~ ,00R PLAN 4 VZ_ C,rA ~„I i / LJ{►+4 Aot`~G % 4RAi FX 14 ~ ~ ~IDEWkLa I , _ r c111' PpFer 2d Fl EL iE n' 4-& _ i NC~P,TN r, _ 1o sp 1 i EVATIONS INFORMATION FOR D:-""1%)LLL) Y , _ 73 "curtr, PLAN FOR THE i DFti F.Lppb1F:N') ~T s 1 ~ • ---F-c r_ ;7i11..G~ _n1@~. T; Is U i 1 W117 1 77! . f d 'a a. 1 c v I'd 2. This Conanc!rc.1 "ilcrrla the Commercial a~ I zoning on the ;+r.,) t• tY. PDh °»fj0 CdjC vo -2. 5 $~9e Ix;Ntr V,iM Z"tl.t - C~1h'1~' hElkt l(,t~~, 3. Acreaae- :.}lf Isee site plat, for survey information) j 1. Lsno used ; Or • t p r,a tar .,tFars a::, - 6500 sf Fur,era r,nurE,r.i►t. ~,ar r BVJT-; W rh IL na i1N ocr~: »nrievr•i::red at this r,i,- '3r61 i. sit ,2-t- nle: • i IC-1 ppl3ca' EI lf)C~,T'IOt'It. = B. not a SCn~F_~ I I = ? f 0- 12'x1" L -12'W 11.n:) ex'Stlnt, trees or, the fits- Rick W 6PAv, l..Errreq U 7 7 :3' owner -o plan. -;ge rou, photinias a)urlq Fmerv Lk,. Ef to meet the reg. fo•. vLSUbI barrzer, 4~ 1 ; r11" Development to begin upon approval of the P i Z and i Council and this Detail Plr,n and will be complete in ! 90 days" (S?A27- Sc.(~ 1yE~ A n P~(ZrY~ZC ALUM/G~55 'ITEMS MS L-S OF THE DFTAILED ALAN REQUIREMENTS ARE SHOWN ON D ET I Lff D PLAN ~ZICK THE SITE PLAN. 011 I.IMIWY -PLAT , 1• - it T__ 1 I j 1 i i FlIE2Y.4T ~I 06 14 U V } +I UNIV"Mrt7 ill • 39 E I r~ ! 1 { I T11 U)(ATIC)t h'l~P I I ~.i I JT I•I t I Jt l 1 l t I 1 f • y_ _ r f t- •Y 1 + ~r _ ' is ~ 'i a - ~ ~ ( ~ >.4-. ~.yta _ y~i2~iti {+L .t7'Zi~~~~LY~81LY~B r1 Sn~ : yn. i.• n i V ♦ of it AF,1 fe ~La G`P 1 11I f i 1 'S f 1 ~ JI ~ nl i ~ i I : 1. 1 _~s~ . { 1! i ~ I i ` • I Y a a 41. F 1 y ~A S~ E IST ASPHALT DP~iVdf I I1 Y i 1 r IIIIIt1 - T~._ _ . 1. ~ _ ■ i i ~Y ` ~r L i~~ 1 v i EXrST ,q.SPt-L4LT a~ 1 ii i - Q 4 1 I ~i x r; • i' T~. ' Ex1sT aC1 ~ r - Y' 1 zj , E, I ' / r k Z/ I _ . t c e (Ar F 4 r . t i' .i f= , ~~'P~ ~~f# e~ t r 1 i ;i 1 - 14 s f ~ - - - rj ~ f., of or:v its.' ) 1 . MV VY V ~ . i _a~ MOMMINUMP~ i f dJ t. Y. LlX"<} 15 r oti+3t A'.S(~ P&L Minutes June 12, 1991 Page 7 On question, Ms. Feshari explained that Jiffy-tube and other such uses are often found in retail strips. Auto parts are usually sold at retail stores. Used car lots are different because the cars are usually being worked on with bay doors open. Outdoor recreation could include go-cart races. Indoor recreation is more like an arcade at the mail. Mr. Kamman asked about the access ramps and if the State has been consulted. Ms. Feshari said that the State has already approved a design and that is what will be built. 1 Mr. Clark said that ramps would only be adjusted if necessary because the existing ones were not functioning r adequately, The existing Loop 288 design will not be , effected by this zoning. Mr. En elbrecht asked why staff is not requiring underground utilities. Ms. Feshari answered that Mr. Robbins spoke with the Utilities Department about the cost. It is difficult for the City to require something when we don't know the cost burden. In the case following this one, staff is requesting that such a restriction be removed because overhead lines are already in place. The idea of burying utilities is f being examined with the entranceway plan. The location of lines will be addressed at the detailed plan stage. The Commission can make burying the lines a condition. y Petitioner; Mr, Don Dillard of Rancho Vista Developpment, stated that they would be willing to remove oil wells from the list of permitted uses. He said that Ms Feshari did a good job giving the overview of the case. He would like to i fill in a few 9ps. They started working with staff in a , February and submitted this zoning request in April. They feel tike they have the support of staff, They went through a work session with the Commission in May and have had two meetings with Westgate residents. They worked with the F neighborhood to make the case more palatable. The property in question is located in northwest Denton on 245 arras. Because of the loop completion, there will be people interested in the Land, Mr. Dillard showed the Commission slides of adjacent zoning. He stated that across 1.36 there is unlimited height and uses in the Light Industrial zoning district. His concept/development plan has a lint of a1,,oed uses and height restrictions that limit the uses. They have done considerable traffic and drainage studies and have developed development standards, They are proposing 20 story offices west of Westgate but height will be limited on other types of uses. The height will be graded in other areas. ~C> v 6kY;5'f1 r 1 i 4i 4:1,'3' ~11 I ! f ~,:.tpsL.(Q t June M12, 1991 DRAFT Page 8 They have worked extensively on utilities and have special provisions for floor to area ratios (FAR). Their plan takes advantage of the Denton Development Plan (DDP) urban center but protects the existing neighborhood. They are applying to change the activity center as activities spill from the loop on down I-35 but will transition into the neighborhood. After the May 7th meeting with the Commission they called local residents to set up a r meeting. ,They met some more residents at that meeting and tried to answer their questions and solve problems. In f ; their original proposal they had a landscaped screening wall. After the meeting, they changed it because the neighbors preferred a 6 brick wall. They also moved the retention pond and designed it so it would not be so close to the homes. At the second meeting, they came +tp with an additional 200' strip which will not have any industrial buildings and will be limited to two stories in height. r That creates a 500' area protecting the neighborhood* HeHe showed slides of examples of brick screening walls, agreed to build the wall before any development occurs } below Westgate and also that the retention pond could be ornamental. Mr. Mitchell Turner asked how far south the development extends. Mr. Dillard displayed the boundaries of the tract to the audience. In favor., Mike Endslow, 3101 Darby, stated that he lives at the southern tip of the proposed development, He said that he decided to talk in favor of the petition because it is probably the best deal the neighbors will get. He does have concerns about the construction phase. There has been flooding three times in seven years. Drainage during the construction period needs to be addressed, There is also a right-of-way issue, He has had to battle with the City because they drive through his yard to get to the lift station. He would tike for the City to find another way, to get there. He has brought in 12 loads of dirt and dug ditches trying to prevent flooding, He appreciates the developer going out of their way to find a screening fence that has drainage openings. He would like for the City to from o him to is h even area, more threatened who by lives floodingss the street attention Bill$ Travis, 3111 Darby, stated that he would like to see a screening 301 . He setback asked with Ifthere planting will t be op„n r meside of the etings for the wall detailed plans. Ms. Feshari answered that the meetings will be open but will not be public hearings. The Commission could make public hearings a condition they choose ~7 I 5)VI { ple•Aii14\_~ Ty2Ufr. Pun Minutes June 12, 1991 Page 9 DRAFT Ray Wilson, 3106 Darby, stated that he is in favor of the petition but want: the wall to be built prior to development south of Westgate. Opposed: Calvin Redfoot, 2612 Bower Drive, stated that he lives Just south of the development. James Saville, 3311 Darby, had to leave but asked that his letter be read to the Commission. It reads, "My property lies directly next to the proposed development, I moved to Westgate to have a country setting but be near town,. This development destroys that setting. It decreased property values and aesthotics E values are destroyed. The property should remain zoned agriculture or the tr~rnsition area should at least remain ; agriculture." Mr. Redfoot continued that his concern with the development began after reading about it in the Denton Record Chronicle. While out on a walk with his neighbors he j noticed a w e sign folded up in the grass. Upon later ( investigation, he found that it was a notice of a zoning change request. The sign appeared to have been folded over and he does rrot know if that was done intentionally, The 1 sign was placed where it couldn't be seen, Another sign for the property was also placLd whore it coulur't be seen and folded over. It could have been vandals or the weather that messed up the sign. He called the Planning Department and the signs were re laced but the positions were not, greatly improved. The subsequont storm got those signs. Mr. Holt said that the Commission cannot make a decision as ? to whether the zoning ordinance has been violated, Mr. Redfoot said that he just wants to go on record that the signs were not adequate. He is opposed to the development. ; It is not a win-win scenario. The traffic patterns of this development will affect other areas. He asked that the petition be denied or tabled. The neighbors were denied their rights because of the signs. Many people do not get the Denton Record Chronicle or do not read public notices, Traffic go ng Tfirouh gFi"hi neighborhood will devalue property. He is concerned that light industrial uses might have fluorocarbons and pose environmental concerns. He is concerned about drainage, The developer showed a slide of a beautiful retention pond but it will catch pesticides and oil, The crime rate will increase in the area, He asked how the City will deal with the traffic and what effect the i tap on to a 12" main will have on water pressure, The developers claim that they are creating jobs, better prices, and competition. That is a win for them. The neighbors moved to the area because they wanted to get away from that, There will be a lot more noise in the area and he does not know why oil wells are being permitted. 4 9 CyRQ)jJ . t P&Z Minutes 12, 1991 June A'k Page 10 Mr. Holt stated that oil wells have been eliminated from the development. Mr. Redfoot added that he is also concerned about the visual I impact and overhead utilities. The area is lovely. j Lou Tasciotti stated that he likes the area and loves Denton. He appreciates that progress cannot be held back, especially around the loop, and that the developers worked with the neighbors. They paint a rosy picture that looks I great, but they have not shown the neighbors what is going to b,r on the other side of the wall. He is concerned. He has -+o problem with a 20 story building. They can be beai.itiFU1 but he does not want to have to listen to a go-cart race track. Cleaning and dying far.ilities,don't t belong in a residential area. Just to the south on one side of I-35 is a beautiful ranch. On the other side is ( abandoned commercial land. He understands that commercial development will take place at the Junction of the loop and I-35, but not why it should be allowed south of there. It { is not really necessary, The developer has said that no one has appooached him about a 20 story building. So why rush into this? If there is an offer, then talks can begin instead of having all this land opened up when other commercial land is available. Mr. Holt stated that this is a new concept which will allow marketing of the lard. Just becat+se the land is rezoned `r. does not mean anything will be built on it. Mr. Tasciotti said that there are other places in the area where residential uses are planned. This proposal takes an area which has had a temporary slow down of residential development and shoots it in the foot by permanently making further residential development unattractive. Things go in cycles. There will come a time when people want to build houses and they will not be inclined to do so in this area anymore. If houses were built, they would be much less f attractive and desirable. Mitchell Turner, 2118 Stonegate, stated that he had expected the people in Westgate to oppose this development. That they have not done so shows the developer has worked well with them, This development will effect the Westgate and Westgate Hills neighborhoods. The concern has been expressed that if the zoning is not changed, then the property will not develop. There are 17 homes under construction in the area today, He does not object to changing the boundaries of the Urban Center to the north or the west. He does object to encroachment in a low activity center. The DDP limits the acreage of moderate centeri. ~y i (r, a j.... . _ -~--•1~°-~'r~ ~N ti977^6N.}~I ffiI P June un minuts 1991 DRAFT Page 11 I This change would effect an additional 23 acres and is for an all commercial development. According to page 17 of the DOP, acreage will havo to be eliminated from another ' moderate center if this change is approvod. It would be better to leave it low intensity and require the developer to develop it that way. Charles Blanco, 2620 Bower, was opposed to the project in the areas of traffic, noise, and poliutian. He said that he t bought his property after searching all of Denton. He did not know this development was coming up. It will lower ; i property and aesthetic values. Many ;people go walking in this area, He understands that the project has a main lntersectian, but Payne and Westgate would get a tremendous increase in traffic. Ema Nance, 2312 Westgate, said that she would like to see' } the area left residential. She used to live in Dallas, but moved to Denton seeking peace and comfort. This project ! would change that. She asked the Commission to consider the I predecessors. Recommendations Ms. Feshari stated that staff recommends approval approval of the zoning application and the amendment to the Concept Mepexcet for the issues addressed P' in the staff report, which she repviewed with the Commission. Mr. Holt stated that he is concerned about traffic going through the neighborhoods. I Mr. Clark stated that Bonnie Brae was built to be an arterial. If Road C reaches capacity, there will be be some hbarhood, There will short cutters through the neig impact anyway. Westgate cannot be left open without impacting the neighborhood, happy with officeldevelopmentiwithha limitedeFARiinbtrasctre happy 1F4 The setbacks are adequate along 1-36 which has lots of right-of-way. There is no setback requirement on the other side of 1.36. This will cause them to lose some smaller users. They agree there needs to be a landscappe buffer. They have 20' set u all along I.36 and on step towards of Loop 288, They feel like this is a majors p t s j entryway issue, Beyond the 20' they agree there should be no t4iidings but parking is necessary for small users. This is the game up and down the Metroplex and along I-36. Mrs Holt asked if they intend to level the hills in the area of the new loop and 1-36, It is a high elevation and the vi,^;r back into town is beautiful. i a[eeca,.~ ~y 7 waukit~~ P&Z Minutes June 12, 199'1 Page 12 Mr. Dillard said no. Their intention is to work with the City when they do detailed site plans, There may be some leveling for specific sites but to level the entire hill would be a lot of work, There will probably be an effort to plan according to the roll of the land. There may be some flatter areas with drainage problems that will have to be filled. I Mr. Holt said that there is a place in south Denton between 1-36 and Dallas Drive that was probably the biggest forest in Denton County. It is named Woodhill. There is not a tree there now. i Mr. Dillard said that they are surrounded by roadways and other developers. They cannot Just fill it and drop off at the back. They have frontage on several different roads so it will be very carefully planned. Someone mentioned the landscape ordinance and the entryway plan. Their plans says that any proposals will be consistent with the todays landscape ordinance and any other ordinances that are in effect at the time of the detailed plan. The Perot application is like this. They want to be consistent with whatever the landscaping ordinance is today. Other ordinances change and they are going to change with them, Mr. Engelbrecht said that some of the neighborhood residents are conrerned about vegetation around the wall. They want the wall because of a concern about a security, That is why they don't want any low vegetation. He wonders why there is not a plan for trees along there given that we know now that they serve as a natural buffer for noise, dust, and a lot of I things that are created by traffic. f Mr. Dillard said that the major focus has been on a barrier type wall. He noted that they have planted 34 pecantrees along the line of the truck stop as an experiment, They staggered them. They are going to build the wall, There will probably be some trees, There is the pond area which will be landscaped, They want to have a very cooperative attitude with the City. They have a lot of pecan trees in another location and they are experimenting with transplanting trees. He is talking about 6-10 inch trees. Their heart is in the right place. They Just need to get some things going so they can afford to get some of these other things done. Vicertchairman Holt closed the public hearing. I Ms, E'eshari stated that Exhibit 8 as submitted by the developer does talk about the relation to the Master Plana i. r K,~~c,_4p1 &new r P&Z. Minutes DRAFT 1991 June i2, Page 13 It basically summarizes what their request is. some of the issues in there have to do with the 40' setback, here is one issue that does have to do with the screening wall. At what time will it go in. It should be considered a definite condition so there will not be another "Jerry Cott Wall" situation. In addition, there are two other conditions that i should be looked at. They have to do with traffic impact setback conditions Commission tote s the She Mr. Holt moved to extend the urban center to include_ sections IC and 10. Mr, Kamman seconded the motion saying that he does not want to delete another moderate center. Mr. Holt added that the reason he is doing this is that it leaves out the problem with the moderate activity center, 4 He thinks it would be unfair to eliminate another one someplace else. Mr. Engelbrecht said that this site does not meet the j locational requirements anyway Motion carried unanimously (5-0). hari stated that the petitioner has designate office Ms. Fes as the low intensity use for tract IF. The rest of the entire tract is referred to as a businehs center whirch includes commercial, retail, etc. Commissio develop with lowconcept/development tensityofficeplan, that tract would w Mr, Engelbriacht asked if the is a maximum floor area ratio (FAR} specified. Ms. Feshari said that it is listed at ,5 FAR but that is not low intensity. The Commission could chango it, She sugggested half of that amount, .26. If the Commission wants it to look and act like r house, which is basically what the the naverageoFARoforeaihouseawouldsbenaboutw.26 ors.286area► ' The Commission discussed possible FAR for tract IF. Mr. Holt moved to recommend approval of Z»91-004 with the follping conditions: 1) Tract IF is limitod to FAR. 2) A brick screening wall, six (6) feet in height, shalt be provided along the north and west edge of the existing Westgate neighborhood, which shares a common boundary E with this district. This screening wall shall be 1 constructed in its ntlreting sWestgattial phase of any development south of l ~ Go IIR'dP~~ i' ~ i Paz Minutes RAI I June 12, 1991 D Page 14 3) Alternative pedestrian access plans require coordination with any existing pedestrian circulation systems in place on adjacent properties at the time of the detailed plan stage. 4) Public hearings are required at the detailed plan stage. 5) The following setbacks shall control over any other specified setback: a) The minimum rear and side yard setbacks shall be twenty (20) feet for any land use abutting a multi-family zoning district or property used for a multi-family dwelling. b) The minimum rear or side yard setbacks shall be twenty (20) feet for any land use abutting the existing single-family Westgate neighborhood. e) Along the IH-350 Loop 288, and US 77 frontages, a minimum forty foot (40') building setback is established, Within this forty-foot (40') area, the first twenty (20) feet adjacent to the highway shall i be designated as a utility and landscape, easement. Parking shall be prohibited within this twenty (201)' foot utility and landscape easement, 6) A traffic impact analysis has been pre red and submitted on the basis of maximum development within the district of 5,300,000 square feet, The City of Denton may require the preparation and submission of an, updated traffic impact analysis under either of the following conditions: a) if any on-site or adjacent public roadway, or controlled intersection on such roadways, reaches a traffic flow level which exceeds capacity (defined as worse than Level-of -Service b) Requested development would exceed 6,300,000 square feet, 7) Adoption of the table of development standards and uses as recommended by staff. Mr, Holt clarified that the condition for public hearings at the detailed plan stage applies to the entire site, Motion to recommend approval with conditions was seconded by Mr, Kamman. Mr. Holt stated that he appreciates the comments that were made. The people most directly affected by this development seem to be satisfied, It is tough to make decisions that will,teffect residential areas, The Commission does not want to adversely affect them. The people probably perceive that something is going to happen on their west side, He would have preferred not to extend the development to the south and it was a hard decision, He thinks that the proposed road layout will protect the neighborhood. Motion carried unanimously (5-0), 9.3 1 Yi3+5fN1+ o,wpdoca\69127 } ORDINANCE N0. DISTRICT OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVIZON NG HA R AN ORDINANCE OFTHE CITY NED DEVELOPMENT (PD) CATER AND SOUTH. AQRICULTURAL (A) TO PLC CLAgSTFICp,TZON AND US 8 DESIGNATION FOR 245.8 ACRES OF LAND TO S. INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 3 FOR AND DISTRICT; AND ON THE EAST SIDE OF U OF Loop 2881 A ANP EOF ECTIVEDDATEOPMENT P PRO Company has applied for a oral (A) to Development ricult ~F from ay I Rancho Vista land ~ 1 WHEREAS, Of in zoning for 245.8 acres district classification and use Change meet (PD) zoning development plan for the cis Tanned develop royal of a designation and for app I trictl and and Zoning Commission jj 1991, the Planning and approval WHEREAS, On June. 12, nested change in zoning I recommended at ment proval plofan) the of the develop g the city Council finds that the change in zoning and Tan will be in compliance with the. WHEREA, ment p approval of the develop NOW, THEREFORE, pennon Development Plana THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS! ficatiOn and use zoning district classi Exhibit is ; That the acres of land described iT £erEance, desigi~f the 24 orated into this ordinance bpO zoning dis-~ and ineorp lanned development 4ttached to ( ) ed from agriculture to pdesignation under the dompi'ehensive Chang Texas. y of Denton, taut classificationthe dCituse j zoning Ordinance of orated into attached to t&nd h ;Development Plan 11. That F,xhibit i~ approved as ter g5 of the reference, in accordance with article 1V of Chap ordinance by the district for code Of Ordinances. zoning map is amended to s official ~~`1.QK_I] , That the City show the change in zoning district classification* That this ordinance shall become effective immedi" ately upon its passage and approve. of 1991. pAsSED AND APPROVED this the, day MAYOR gOg CASTLEBERRYr 1 ATTESTt j JENNIFER WALTERSr CITY SECRETARY G BY- APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt ATTORNEY CITY DEBRA A. DRAYOVYTCNr a may,,.,,,, ~ BY: -E ,f t 1 PA09 2 Exhibit A (Page 1 of 4) 2011rlnARY AND OWNSRSI IL The 245.8 acres (owned by Rancho Vista Development Company) la divided Into two (2) tracts by Loop 286 a.+ shown on the Boundary Map. Tract I (located south of Loop 286) contains approximately 165.913 acres. Tract 11 (located north of Loop 288) contalas 76,865 acres. Complete metes and bounds descriptions us included in the following descriptions. A Boundary Map (Map 4-1) Is included at the and of this section. Tract I. Parcel I All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the Nathan Wade Survey, Abstract Number 1407, City of Denton, County of Denton, State of Toxast sand tract being described in Exhibit "A" as shown by deed to J R L Partners (Partners), dated 01 July 1948, and recorded in Volume 2403 Page 769 of the Rai Property Records of the County of Denton, State of Texas, and being more fully described as follows: BEOINN1NG for the southern corner of the treat being described herein at s set f-Inch saol square tubing in Westgaa Sow (tea asphalt turfaced public reed) at the southwt oortser of said Partners tract, uW tubing being the northeast corner of a 96,315-eau tract ashown by deed to J R L Puma. dated 01 July 1961, and recorded In Volume 2403 Page 743 of said Real Property Records, sad le the *at line of a treat shows by deed to Joseph J. To"'.. Trustee, and recorded Is Volum ISO Pop 906 of NW,Deeai RecordR . THENCE South $VSs'46" Watt, With the south Iltte of said Pattaors troot and with the north floe of said 96.345-acre tract, a distaaa of 2. 190,34 hen to a fet f-loch robot in tM southerly right-of-wsy line of Interstate Highway 33; THENCE North 46055120' Wem with the right-of-way of lntmats Highway 35, a diataaae of 100.9 feet to a concrete right-of-way moetunmr THENCE North 03.41'29" Watt, with the eat tine of saW lmterwo Highway 3$, a dlstttsaoe of 421.52 feet to a fomW 3-loth mbar In the southerly right-of-way line of Loop 2119 (under constructiony; THENCE with Ow soudody right-of-way !less of Loop tat, the following six (6) courses and distances: I , North 13010146" Eat, a distance of 140.01 feet; 2. North 01.13'26' West, a diwna of 440.46 !near 3. North 3661711" East, ,t die aoa of 91.11 feet; 4. North SV49'2t" Ease. a dlosam of 1123.01 feet; S. None 71'31"2!' 214 a dls"On of 121.44 feet to the beginning of a Our" to the left whose radius Is 5189.69 feet; 6. With UW turn, an Imo lengds of 1,373,73 feet, centre! aagie of 1392T19" (chord North 79'36'26• tsK a dletyrtoe of 1,370.51 hat) to a farad r-inak rsbW for the northeast cornier of tM cforeaW TIN tract; THENCE: South 00'07153" West, with the east line of s6W tract, a distaom of 661.Yt feet to a fence corner pat; uu.u nxkiw iw,.~r t, 5ikNt'?,~f d4. P. Wd E.chibit A (Page 2 of 4) THENCE South 89016'38' Weet, with a fence, a distance of 373,60 feet to fence corner post, said-post being the northwest corner of the aforesaid Tallal tract; THENCE South 00'33134• East, a distance of 873.10 feet to the POINT OF 990INNINO and containing 70.533 acres of 1244, Traci I. Nareal 2 All that certain tract or paroW of fatsd situstS4 in the Nathan Wade Survey, Abstract Number 1 1407, City of Denton, County of Denton, State of Texas; said tract being shown by deed to J A L Partners, dated 01 July 1988, and recorded In Volume 2405 Page 149 of the Real Property Records of the county of Denton, State of Texas, and berg more fully described as follows: EEGINNIN! 'or the northwst corner of the tract being described herein at a set 4-inch stal square tubiu;, and tubing being the northeast corner of said Partners tnwt, and as the southeast corner of a 70,533-acre tract as shown by deed to J A L Partnen, datod 01 July 1988, and recorded in Voluw 2405 Page 769 of $aid Real Property Records, sad in the west line of a tract shown by Deed to Joseph J. Tailal, Trust", and recorded in Volume 1513 Page 906 of sold Deed RecordK f THENCE South 00'33'34' East, with Ta1101 welt line, a dbtaaes of 229,3 tat to a set -inch steel square tubing for an an costar of said Partners tract; THENCE South 89"05139' West, a distance of 62122 fat to it chain-114k fetsae corner post at the moat northerly earthwwt 46nw of the Westgaw. Park Pint Addition, recorded in Volutne 04 Page' 12 of'the Rea Rioordr, of Denton County, Testa THENCE South 01'0311• Watt. with the west line of said Westgate Park, a distaam of 215.00 feet to a found }_ineh rebar as the southwest corner of Block A, Westgate Park Addition; THENCE South 89019'55' Weak a distance of 37.45 feet to a found f4stck robar at the aorthwwt corner of Barrow off" (aa asphalt surfaced public .radk j THENCE South 01014'12" Ea6t, with the west line of said Wastage Petit, a disnam of 1,983.81 feet to a found laneb nabrr at tin southwest eonw of Fhidgae Drl" (an aaphWe surfaced public roadk THENCE North 89'21'0!' lFaat, with th6 scu:b lira of Ftadgar Drive. a dkmasoS o< 21.13 fcset to a found 4-inch rebar at the sortkweat ctsrnor of Block C Weat$w Park Addition; THENCE South VI0'33' last, with the newt line of said Block C. a disc st" of 200.87 fee to a found 4-Inch rebar u dw sottdtwat corner of sold Black C, and the soutloom corner of said Paruwis tract, seW Maas Mae being in the north line of the F. Bow at Survey, Abstrw Number 43, and tlw south liar of said Wada Survey; THENCE South W11 '3I' Was, wilt the north line of said Batton 3tuw6y0 the South line of said Wede Survey, and the somb One of said Parts" trace, a 4bian t of 1.488.74 few to a concrete rlght-of•way Me-1 in the Batt rlght-of-way 1146 of laWMU Highway 3$; tnrw,ureoMneNS,,. i i l _ 1 l; ~J .[Ye>Fav~yt Exhibit A (Page 3 of 4) THENCE with the east right-of-way in Interstate Highway 35 the following five (5) courses and distances: 1. North 041116'57" East, a distance of 72.83 feet; 2. North 03946'06" West, it distance of 1,200.0 feet; 3. North 081815" West, a dlamnce of 100,58 feet; 4. North 03'46'06" West, a distance of 1,184,87 feet; 5. North 43'06'20" East, a distauce of 123.05 feet to a set f-Inch steel square tubing in Payne Drive; THENCE North 89433146" East, with the north Moo of said Partners tract, and south line of said 70.533-acre tract, a distance of 2,190,34 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 96.38 acres of land, Tract 11 All that certain tractor paresi land situated In the Alexander White Survey, Abstract Number 1406 and the Nathan Wade Survey, Abstract Number 1407, City of Denton, County of Denton, State of Texas, said tract being described in Exhibit "B" as shown by deed to J A L I, Partnem, dated 01 July 1988, and recorded in volume 240s Pap 769 of the Real Property Records of the County of Denton. State of Texas, and being mots fully described as follows: 1 BEGINNING for the northeast corner of the tract being described Iserein at a four: !-inch , rebar on the south line of US Highway number 77 (an asphalt surfaced public road), said rebar being the northeast corner of said Partners tract; THENCE South 00608'41" West. with the gut line of said hrtosrs tract, a dicta no of 739,07 feet to a found'i-inch rebar is the north right-of-way Ilse of Looq 288 (under eonstrttotu,a}; ffff Thence with the north right-of-way Lite of Loop 288 the followias six (6) coupes and I distances; t I . South 73043'00" West, a distance of 116.46 feet to the be8lou ing of a curve to the t right whose radius Is 5,609.69 feet, central angle of 064S9'4i j 2. With said cur", an w length of 685.03 fast (,:h--vd South k2M'43' West, a distance of 684.60 feet; 3. North 84022133' Weer, a dtaaati of 394.09 feet; I 4, North 7319001 0 Wes4 a distasa of 36LIM faeN 5, South 894418' Wag, a dbtaacs of $20.14 feet; 6. North 44•41'4r West a diltana of 141.74 feet to a found f-Inch rebar In the out right-of-way of Intarrmw Highway 35; THENCE North 030431W West, with the eta line of Bald Itttertsas% a dhtaata of 1,441.00 feet to a wooded right-of-way monument at the southwest corner of a tract shown by deed to Union Oil of CaUfornh, MW Recorded In Volume, 602 Mtge 4S of sale deed naords, THENCE South 8911313' East, with the south line of said Unions Oil tract, a distance of 1,022,90 feet to a fence coats' post at its southeast corner; THENCE North 00'22'23' Weft, with a fence on the gut line of sold Union Oil tract, a distance of 446,03 feet to a found }-Inch rebar lit the south Hot of said Highway 77; ONn~aVQOMN+.~~iMp S 1 i Exhibit A (Page 4 of 4) i' ' . With the south lisle of 8014 Hi{hwnY M, a dist"" Of 11 $171 THENt,`E South $9'01" Ea~A d6ed to Joan Porter, ad i, feet to a found i-inch rebar in the welt 1100 of a tract *own by , deed woordl recorded In Voiuate 930 P9N 9Z3 of slid of 939.41 Feet THENCE South 40''4'36" E"t, with a fostce oa f said Powise tine, a dlstanatt to a found }.inch rebar at the southwM corner of said ttie r south. a dist9ace of 1,316,47 feet I THENCE South 89"44'36* Eta'„ with a fence Oct t*', scutbe to a fence corner posy at Fotwr's es 7'26" East, with 9 fence. a distattoe of 134465 feet to a found i-tu„r1 ! TRENCH North 00`3 77; re'ou in the south line of 8914 HighwalI f IIa, t~ of 446.94 fat to the f THENCE South 39'0T I V East, with s9td ritttt-ot- saws Y of s@, & { POINT OF 8Et3INNINO gad ccat idoWS 78.1165 I WUL I , 1 ~Ost`I11F~ t T EXHIBIT A (BOUNDARY MP) i } C ,wi~~' us f SMA +.1!fM k TOW I V 1 rl ~ R ; k i tr 1 ~1 M~l~ i f 1 Map 4-1 ~ HILLCMI~T CtNTlII j BOUNDARY 11 I r 1 I 1 J d 1 Exhibit B I I i Development Plan for Hillcrest Center, consisting of: ti5 1. Information and Development Standards (6 pages)► f 2. Proposed Roads (1 page)t k 3, screening wall Construction Details (1 page); 4. Table B-1, Permitted and Prohibited Uses (6 pages)i 5. Table B-2, Permitted Uses and Applicable Development standard (3 pages); 6. Site Plan (1 page, fold out); and 7. Transition Plan (1 page, fold out). I , i i I I r f, s,; f r~ n $ EXHIBIT B DEVE.LOPM[ENT PLAN FOR , HILLCREST CENTER I 1 t, Relationship to the Master Plan This property is located in the expanded "Urban Center' at the node created by the interchange of IH-35 and Loop 288 in northwest Denton, Urban Centers are strategically located to encourage the concentration of commercial, retail, office, light industrial, and multifamily housing, These centers are intended to serve as the hub i for economic activity and employment. According to the plan, the northwest urban center should be approximately equal in size to the southeast center by the year 2010. 2,_ Size of District The district has 248,8 acres. i 8;„ Terms l Ten ms used in the Development Platt shall have the meaning as defined in the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, unless defined in this Plan, i F i 4_,~( rddinance Governing This District and Development Plan are approved in accordance with, and shall be j governed by, the provisions of Article N, Chapter 35, of the Code of Ordinances. 6. Pe!'rr►itted User The following general uses and combination of uses are permitted, A detailed list of Permitted and Prohibited Uses is attached as Table B-1, subject to the additional llmitatlotu, (1) that only office uses are permitted on Tract IF adjacent w the existing Westgate neighborhood, (2) no industrial building will be permitted within five hundred (500) feet of the west boundary of the existing Westgate subdivision; and (3) that no Industrial building will be permitted on Tract I A, Retails Any establishment whose primary purpose is to provide goods and services to the general public for their use or consumption. The permitted uiw ahail exclude residential ums, E B. Commovialt Any proposed use or proposed mix of uses, including multiple dwellingunitdevelopment andhospitality uses, MultipledweMng unit development is permitted only when approved In conjunction with and a part of commercial development, The hospitality uses will provide Will I rv;:eay i 1@gy3i t i Development Plan • Hillerest Center Page 2 facilities which offer transient lodging accommodations to the general public and which provide additionid services such as, but not limited, to restaurants, meeting rooms, and recreation facilities. Uses such as hotels and motels and convention and meeting conference facilities will provide support for the office, institution, and manufacturing/distribution uses in the district, 1 C. Of£ice. Office type uses with support retail facilities servicing the f ' • P employees are encouraged as support for the manufacturing and commercial uses or as independent office developments which are well planned, amenity-oriented facilities for service, industrial, and institutionally related users, D. Manufacturing: This classification permits the development of manufacturing land uses and excludes any residential land uses and the prohibited uses listed in this plan for the business and industrial park ` E area. This classification encoumges clean manuf'acturing' assembly and warehouse, and distribution typ« facilities, l E. Institutional: Governmental, educational, medical, and cultural facilities i are compatible within the business and industrial park, except for residential uses and those prohibited uses listed in this Ordinance, i F. Reerestional: The manufacturing, commercial, and institutional uses E may have recreational facilities to support the health and iF th~are employees. These types of recreational uses are permit i 4 developed In conjunction with the open spaces and latent of the overall planned development. I G. Farm and Ranoh: Farming, ranching, and agricultural type activities are permitter' in the district H, Accessory Users The use of land or a building or portion thereof customarily incidental and subordSnate to the principal use of the land or building and located on the same lot with such principal use are permitted. 'Prohibited Uses Speac prohibited uses are shown in Table &S. " ~-velossment Statrdsucds densi for Development standards, he regulations, ptt ddin the ddist ict are shown as indivllowsidual, parcels relating to o e development standard Table J3.2 correlates each of the permitted uses to a specific j A VIbMNdIu<ni.xe NNbiax.m 1i, t. e i Development Plan Hillcrest Center page 3 development r bons, and ent standards, an p, Rstails The develOpm ignat d for retail use shall be as follows: de intensity for property ; None Minimum lot area None Minimuin lot width None Minirnum lot depth 25 Ft. Mininnu'n Front yard setback 10 Ft. Minimum Rear yard setback 10 Ft. Minimkun Side yard setback 26 Ft. Corner lot requirement qg Ft. Maximum building height G096 Maximum lot coverage 001 Maximum floor to area ratio As listed for each permitted use Parking in the Denton Zoning Ordinance 1 am regulations, and g Commercials The development "ndarrlor corzunerdal use shall be { development intensity for property desi8na as follows: Minimum lot area Nonei 164 R. Minimum lot width None Minimum lot depth 26 Ft. ` Minimum Front yard setback 1.0 Ft Minimum Rear yard setback 10 Ft. MWmum Side Yard setback 26 Ft. I Corner lot requirement 20 Stories j Madmum building height 60% t l Marirnm lot coverage 2:1 { floor to area ratio An listed for each use in the Parking Denton Zoaing Or"""' area reg~atwos, and development C. offices The development standards, sres~l be as follows, intensity for property designated for office use Minimum lot area None e minimum lot width None Minimum lot depth 26 Ft. Minimum Front yard setback 10 Ft setback Minimum Rear Y rd setback 10 Ft. Minimum Side yard 26 Ft. Corner lot requirement 20 $torl" Maximum Wilding height Maxcimum lot coverage 2x1 Maximum fir,or to area ratio 1 SPl30 SF of door area (1) i Parking s i , t l) 1 3pace/260 SF for clinics or Doctors' offices. { q V18TA~NIlMst%ASki'"'to r= ry l~ ' i Y/FNdki i t II i Development Plan - Hillcrest Center Page 4 i D. Manufacturing: The development standards, area regulations, and development intensity for property designated for Manufacturing use shall j be as follows: Minimum lot area 3 Acres Minimum lot width 200 Ft. Minimum lot depth None ; Minimum Front yard setback 25 Ft. Minimum Rear yard setback 10 Ft, i Minimum Side yard setback 10 Ft. t Corner lot requirement 28 Ft, ' Maximum building height 42 Ft.(I) Maximum building coverage 75% Maximum floor to area ratio 1:1 Parking 1 SP/1000 SF. of floor area 1 1 (1) Sleight may be: increased by 1 foot above 42 feet for each 1 foot of increase in the front, side, and rear yard setbacks, up to a maximum of 8 stories E, Institutional: The development standards, area regulations, and development intensity for property designated for institutional use shall be I as follows: Minimum lot area None Minimum lot width None Minimum lot depth None j Minimum Front yard setUtck 25 Ft. Minimum Rear yard setback 10 Ft. 1 " Minimum Side yard setback 10 Ft, Corner lot requirement 25 Ft. Maximum building height 45 FLO) Maximum lot coverage 6096 Maximum floor to area ratio 2,1 Parking 1 SP/300 SF. of floor area (1) Height g increase m in the fronts dby foot el and rears ya45 foot for each I rd setbacks, up t4 a maximum of 20 stories. F. Setbaekst The following setbacks shall control over any other specified setback: 1) The minimum rear and aide yard setbacks shall district or (200) f oet for any land use abutting a multifamily property. I " used for a multifamily dwelling, vluu+r.w H VISI'A~HIlkmra8 1 ' tl 'n VIA 1 Development Plan Hillcrest Center Page 6 2) The minimum rear or side yard setbacks shall be twenty ((20) ieOt ' ; for any land use abutting the existing single-family tgete neighborhood, 3) Along the M-38, Loop 288, and US-77 frontages, a minimum forty- foot (407 building setback is established. Within thisfortyfoot (40') ; area, the first twenty (20) feet adjacent to the highway shall be designated as a utility easement, Parking shall be prohibited within this twenty t-0) foot utility easement, j G, Development Intensity: The overall density of development shalt be ! subject to the following limitations: I 1) North of Westgate (Parcel 1 of Tract 1, plua Tract II) • 149.40 acres Overall cumulative maximum FAN- 1.6 : 1 I Individual site maximum FAIL - As governed by above ! development standards, but in no case greater than 2 : 1 ~f 2) South of Westgate (Tract I, Parcel 2) - 96.38 acres Overall cumulative maximum FAR 0.76: i individual site maximum FAR » As governed by above development standards, but in no event greater than 1 : 1 Tract IF transition zone - maximum FAR for the tract's gross area shall be 0,3 : 1 I H, Height: The maximum height permitted in the district shall be twenty (20) stories. subject to the following additional limitations: Maximum heights for individual land uses shall not exceed those shown in the above development standards for individual land uses South of Westgate - ten (10) stories maximum Tract IF transition zone - one (1) story maximum Within the portion of Tracts IC and ID that it five hundred (600) feet west of the existing Westgate neighborhood, no structure shall exceed two (2) stories in height Within Tract IE, no structure shall exceed two (2) stories in height, 1, Denton Airport Zoning Regulations: All buildings and structures within the district shall also be subject to the height limitation of the Municipal Airport Zoning Regulations and federal regulations, , ' ~ YVIS'tA\HlllcntlG~Y\91W,10 3 I Development Plan • Hillcrest Center Page 6 ies shai1 J. Calculations of FAR: Parking facilit not be included in calculating floor to area ratios. ents: Adjustments in the location of if roadsa K Road AH approved by plat gnm plan may be made without amendment of this plan plan. All public roads shall be designed and constructed in detail 1 accordance with City of Denton design cant Ana and construction standards j in effect at the time of detail plan appro"I atinns of the Denton and Signs: The rem scapirB, Tress, L. Land the date of the approve) of this plan, sha+> j Landscape Code in effect on apply to the district. ! i i M, Westgate Neighborhood Bu a aloreethe north and west edge oixthe boundary with 1 feet in height, shall be p Westgate neighborhood, which shares a common prior existing in its entitetY this district This screening wall shall be constructed to the issuing of a building Permit far the construction of any builfd the the south of Westgate Road. it shall mess ~ A SM"nn c Wail lase attached Standard Detalla for Thin S paragraph 91)). there is W public N. pedestrian Access and Circulation: presensiy, A&ow to any pedestrian accasslcirculacion agate nib do event a public system portion of the districts boundarY. prior to approval of a detail nt to the district's boundary rian s98tsmt j Y lc public edest e p plan Pa adiaee , I within the district next to the P ub 4 on property sad and extaaded by ~ such public pedestrian ayatecn wj~ be rwii1l~be constructed aim* bock E development within the district. Sidewalks tj" of meandering 9&WAW sides of all public roads within the distri a will be ermEcted. { within easements outside public rights-o - Y o 'n-~ o Iutatt +nalvs cc analysis has been prepared and submitted on the buis of maximum A traffio imps uare feet, The City of Denton may development within the district of 8,300,000 sq and submission of an updated traffic impacs analysis under require the preparation co nditions; either if the following aou on Such If any on-site or ad)acentpublic c Row ed 1 which exceeds capaor i Y debed as roadways, reaches a traffi worse than Levei•of•Servlce iLOS) C), r square ) uare feet. Requested development would exceed 8, I } fµVIITA~HIIkn~NxN~nlN,lo i i j 6bl2SSE fV ,f k r ,s i i 3 I -el ~gg ^•ti irac~. 3 3 ,o...,wn.. } am w . 04 Y Ammo I / am" .urV 00 14 i " HKl,GRtS~ Gl1C1'~ PROPOSED ROADS c--- v +p n qq .J Is# iii g~~ 3 { c i. r I N Vill, 'fill r ' + c ~ If HIMI N■ LNNI Idl} IN f ~ . 0 r i ~ i 1 ~R 5 i S 4Hr r.•/ '1'I IrIN nu Y~YA hNn I _.~u y 11111 UAL- ( ~•'IMNN WINI MI IIIIM F/ S ' NN MMLI.,,11.. Y1 W/11 Y~In.I1Nf1 ~/tiV I.~ ~ _ I i •~1 ~NNWYN 1.1. II•IN •IlMNN 4Y YMIlI.~YYIII _ { ,yNII1✓✓I1MyN WM~NII IYVIIM -T' 1 e. a ~ ^ ' 1 MI~M IYIMII IW M I••Il• 1''\ 1 IMIYN•11.11Nwwll Ylgl A4 ' IIM / M✓WNIW ICI rNllYl N r✓ 7MNM hVMM ♦ ~ 1 Y/hYYI IFIIYrmll MyWIN✓N ~/'1~ f YII IKN IlN MMMN / I4N1 MMI M' NM h441 WWII Y/ 1 I ...N 11yNN I~OUNDA7W tl DETAIL SCM _79M ' r ~ ~N ~r w IM 1111.111 IIIIY rF 1 W,' 1 Y~iWI~{~Ilyl~ylywN/Ww~ry1✓yryWNw flrwl 11 lww: 1 y1~ •Y~IMNM Y NN ~•MNM NW IW WIN N , ~MW~hII WII~MN IW NMW MNIIIWIIM 1 11A YILV WM11Y Y IrA w YY /W Y Y y' 1 Y y~YW~1 M1Y ylr 1yW 1y y~~yy~.( ~I • rlyYYlyY MwY1iINIWiWWf W/MM I ~1. ♦W- N. { MW FW WYMY N WM NMMI W/MNI M 1 arYr 1. Y ~ M M511114' r NII IIIINM ~ 1 ; I I~I PrITY 'ipW ~ - IifM0AA0 COMtiAYOTKW NrlAM.1 ,J! gLaVAT14N fi'n unwlr> ~ M11; n/, nN 1 s. TABLE B-1 HILLCREST CENTER "BUSINESS USES" PERMITTED PROHIBITED LAND USES PFfIMAFiYAE5JDEIV'!7,4L',IJS;:S., X ONE•FAMILY OWWELIN0 DETACH'i) X ONE-PAMILY OWELLING ATTACHED X TWO-FAMILY DWE~ L.LING X MULTIPLE•FAMILY DWELLING OR APARTMENT N COMMUNITY UNIT DEVELOPMENT X DORMITORY, BOARDING OR ROB L USE X HOTEL OR MOTEL TRAILER CAMP OR MOBILE HOME PARK EaucArronra rNSi7'ri171FJRM LW SA C ~ X. t ART GALLERY OR MUSEUM X Y CEMETERYORMAt LEUM _ --X P CHURCH OR RECTORY X -FO COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY OR PRWATE SCHOOL _ X COMMUNITY CENTER (PUBLIC) X OAY CAMP X 1111 11 11111111, "11" "11" "11" "11". "11, . DAY NURSERY OR KINDERGARTEN SCHOOLr X FAI808OUNO OR EXHIBITION AREA X FRATERNITY, SORORITY, I~~ 4E OR CIVIC CLU6 X GROUP HOMES HALFWAY HOUSE HOME FOR CARE OF ALCOHOLIC NARCOTIC OR x IENT$ X A7 PSYCHIATRIC P HOSPITAL (GENERAL ACUTE CARE) X HOSPITAL (CHRONIC CARE) INSTITUTIONS OF REL00US OR PHH.ANTHROWC NATURE X LIBRARY (PUBLIC) X MONASTERY OR CONVENT NURSING NOME OR RESIDENCE HOME OR AGED OCCASIONAL SALES X PUBLIC PARK, PLAYGROUND OR COMMAUNrfY CENTER x SCJJOOI. PRIVATE PRIMARY OR SE ARY X PUBLIC SCHOOL OR DENOMINATIONAL SCHOOL X SCHOOL, BUSINRSS OR 1RAOE 1018 F R"lwhvlI N 1 h •s i'S~'ili: HILLCREST CENTER "BUSINESS USES" PERMiI"TED PROHIBITED LAND USES U7J TY, ACCESSONY, ,auA 4CIDEWAL uses < X ACCESSORY BUILDING X COMMUNITY CENTER (PRIVATE) X ELECTRICAL GENERATING PLANT X ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION LINE X X FIELD OR CONSTRUCTION OFFICE (TEMPORARY) X FIRE STA710N OR SIMILAR PUBLIC SAFETY BUILO[N0 GAS TFfAN5MISSION LINE AND METERING STATION X HOME OCCUPATION X LOCAL UTILITY OISTRISUTION LINES X OFF-STREET PARKING INCIDENTAL TO MAIN USE X X , PRIVATE U71liTY SHOW OR STORAGE YARD US-LIC BUILDING, SHOP, YARD OF LOCAL STATE OR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT X RAOIO AND TELEVISION OR MICROWAVE TOWER N SEWAGE PUMPING STATION X F SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT X E SWIMMING POOL (PRIVATE) X TELEPHONE, BUSINESS OFFICE TELEPHONE LINE & EXCHANGE SWfTCHING OR X RELAY STATION j WATER RESERVOIR (GROUND OR ELEVATED), WATER _ X f PUMPING STATION OR WELL X WATER TREATMENT PLANT X k TELECOMMUNICATIONS PORT ~ sz s RPGHEA7TONA AMUSEMENT, COMMERCIAL (OUTDOOR) X North of Woatgnu SWth of_W4s19MO - AMUSEMENT, COMMERCIAL (INDOORI X COUNTRY CLUB (PRIVATE) WITH GOLF C0URS5r~ x DANCE HALL. OR NIGHT CLUB X ORAG STRIP 0 COMMERCtAL RACING X GO CART TRACK GOLF COURSE (PUBLI X rr~_ X GOLF COURSE (COMMERCIAL) X PARK OR PLAYGROUND (PUBLIC) X PLAYFIELO OR STADIUM (PUBLIC) X RODEO GROUNOS X ROLLER OR ICE SKATING RINK X STABLE. PRIVATE CLU11 X STABLE, COMMERCIAL RENTAL STABLE, 80A401NG X SWIM OAT NNIS CLUB X THEATER, ORIVE-IN X THEATER. OTHER THAN DRIVE-INTYPE 20f6 I r T" eY#r lVltlfhs' i M M'iNtV91: I. { -HILLCREST CENTER "BUSINESS USES" PE RM fTTEA PROHISMED LAND USED { TR4NSPORT~T70N RC'LAM,', 3 5& , j HELIPAO North of Westgate x E South Of Westgate SUS STATION OR TERMINAL X HAULING OR STORAGE COMPANY X MOTOR FREIGHT TERMINAL X RAILROAD FREIGHT TERMINAL X RAILROAD PASSENGER STATION X I RAILROAD TRACK OR RIGHT•0F•WAY X RAILROAD TEAM TRACK X + PARKING LOT (TRUCK) PARKING LOT OR STRUCTURE (COMMERCIAL) X , J I AUTOMOBILES ~RVIGE,USES AUTO LAUNDRY (CAR WASH) X AUTO PAINTING AND SOOY REPAIR X Norte of Westgate III South of Westgate X AUTO SALES AND REPAIR (IN SUILDING{ X AUTO WRECKING OR SALVAGE YARD X GASOLINE SERVICE STATION X NEW AUTO PARTS SALES STORES X NEW OR USED OAR SALES LOT IN OPEM X SEAT COVER AND MUFFL R INSTALLATION SFfOP X TIRE RETREADING OR CAPPING X USED AUTO PARTS SALES (IN BUILDING) 3of6 9 d - YW .IS'h++-:acv ( HILLCREST CENTER "BUSINESS USES" PERM ITTED PROHIBITED LAND USES j RETAIL ANO.SEAVtG~ TYE?E.tlSES°<'` X ANTIQUE SHOP X SAKERY OR CCNFECTIONERY SHOP (RETAIL) X CAFETERIA X I CLEANING AND PRESSING SMALL SHOP AND PICKUP X CUSTOM PERSONAL SERVICE SHOP X DRAPERY, NEEDLEWORK OR WEAVING SHOP X S FLORIST OR GARDEN SHOP X GREENHOUSE OA PLANT NURSERY (RETAIL) X X HANDICRAFT SHOP } . HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE SERVICE AND REPAIR X LAUNDRY OR CLEANING SELF SERVICE X. MIMEOGRAPH, STATIONERY OR LETTER SHOP X MORTUARY OR FUNERAL PARLOR X I OFFICES, PROFESSIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE X. OFF PREMISE SALE OF BEER ANWOR WINE X ON REMISE SALE OF SEER ANOlOR WINE X LICENSED PRIVATE CLUB X X 1 PAWN SHOP X! RESTAURANT RETAIL STORES AND SHOPS RETAtt IN OFFICE BLIDW, A MAX OF 20% OF GROSS AREA i STUDIO FOR PHOTOGRAPHER MUSK:UIN, X i ARTIST OR HEALTH OR X SECONOHANO STORE, USED FURNRURE RUMMAGE SALE TOOL OR TRAILER RENTAL X SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESSES A601CII4TLIfiRE 7YPE t1 . R X ANIMAL POUND (PUBLIC OR PRIVA X ANIMAL CLINIC OR HOSPITAL (NO OUTSIDE RUNS OR PENS ANIMAL LINiC, HOSPITAL OR KENNEL X WITH OUTSIDE RUNS OR PENS (Nw%h o"" X u~ otAy) FARM OR RANCH (38EENHOUSE OR PLANT NURSERY X. HATCHERY. POULTRY X LIVEST CK AUCTION X LIVESTOCK FEEDING PU1NT, PENS OR YARDS 4of6 i j r 5YSt(SR I4. ,a I LCREST CENTER "BUclNESS USES" L Hl PERMITTED PROHIBITED LAND USES :COMMERCJAt ' % BAKERY (WHOLESALE) % BUILDING MATERIAL SALES - X CABINET AND UPblki:i :RY SHOP X I CLEANING AND 5YEI?10 PLANT (COMMERCIALI ARPETS X CLEANING PLANT, SAGS OR C I (SPECIAL 8QU1PMENf) CLOTHING MANUFAC-i URE OR LIGHT % COMPOUNDING OR FABRICATION x E CONTRAOTORS SHOP AND STORAGE YARD X i s ENGINE AND MOTOR REPAIRING X (Not wtthln 500 feet of WastgusbbvlSksn) FEED STORE HEAVY MACHINERY SALESAND STORAGE X (Not within 500 feet of Watgao SubdvISiOn) % ER PRINTING JOB PRINTING OR NEWSPAP % i LAUNDRY PLANT ICOMMERGIAL) % j MILK DEPOT. DAIRY OR ICE CREAM Pl-ANT % PAINT SHOP % PETROLEUM PRODUCTS (PACKAGEDIRAGE WHcLESAL % PLUMBING SHOP SALES l;A STORAGE % SAND, GRAVEL OR EAA1H I SCIENTIFIC OR RESEARCH uBORATORIE9 % gTORAGE ANO SALES OF FURNITURE OR S X APPLIANCE OUTSIDE A BUILDING X STORAGE O I ALES W EHOUSE i TRAILER RE AL OR SALES (D*W Mobl~ µH M ) % TRANSFER, STORAGE AND BAGGAGE TEA LE 0 FILE AND SAMPLE ROOM WHOL£SA Fsi9l~ I (4 URAL R EXTRACTION AND STORAGE Of~ SAND, CALIGHEI % ' STONE. CLAY OR GRAVEL FOR COMMERICAL USE % OAS WELL 1 PETROLEUMbR % + PETROLEUM COLLECTA0 OR STORAGE FACILITIES % MINING OR STORAGE OF MINING WASTES I i t C 6of6 T~:t1M5f~ 1 NILLCREST CENTER "BUSINESS USES" PERMITTED PRriHSrrEO LAND USES t ASPHALT OR CONCRETE BATCHING PLANT X BRIGK KILN OR TILE PLANT x CEMENT OR HYDRATED LIME M NUFACTURE X DUMP OR SANITARY FILLAREA X r "V MIXING AND SALE OF CONCRETE X r OPEN SALVAGE YARD FOR AAOS OR MACHINERY ETC X SMELTER `EFINERY j y i 1'- 5 ! sa i.n r. z c ~71♦~~T3 till 4<~.! ~ r LIGHT MANUFACTURING OR INDUSTRIAL USES WHICH MEET THE PERFORMANCE STANOAA03 PRESCRIBED BY X 13, 18A, 1 THROUGH 7 , HEAVY MANUFACTURING OR INDUSTRI' L USES NOT I PROHIBITED 8Y LAW AND EXCEPTING THOSE SPECIFICALLY LISTED AS REQUIRING SPECIFIC USE PERMITS WHICH MEET THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS X F PRESCRIBED BY 131 tea 1 THROUGH $ j ANY INDUf;TR1AL USE WHICH OUE TO THE POSSIBLE EMISSION OF EXCESSIVE SMOKE, NOISE. OAS. FUMES. E DUST, DOOR, VIBRATION OR THE DANGER OF FIRE, EXPLOSION, OR RADIATION AS MAY BE DETERMINED BY THE HEALTH, FIRE OR BUILDING OFFICALS TO Be II PRESENTLY, OR IN THE FUTURE UK6LY TO BE A HAZARD +I OR NUISANCE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OR THE i COMMUNITY AT LARGE BUT WHICH MAY 8E LOCATED X ANO OPERATEq UNDER BpECiFK: STANDARDS pVbYA~llyiyyr.M'111919~.t0 ,r RequMes put>Ilc nearlnp wUh i nol#icatian (as norma" reau+rod W zonft) at WN of DOW Plan to approve U". I I i i 6Of6 { , y,. w Applicable Development Standard l TABLE B--L CD Permitted Land Use m d CC U Z O PRIM tPIY RESIQEMIAL tISE5 . $ x HOTEL OR MOTE: EDUCATlONAC„ NSA X ART GALLERY OR MUSEUM x COLLEt3E OR UNIVERSITY DA PRIVATE SCHOOL x I A COMMUNIT CC., LATER WUBLICI X j DAY CAMP DAY NJ X RSERY OR KINDERGARTEN SCHOOL HOMr. FOR CARE OF ALCOHCUC, NARCCTTIC OA % PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS X HVSPITAL (GENERAL ACUTE CARE) X f' R HOSPITAL (CHRONIC CASE) X INSTITU rIONS OF REL{OIOUS OR PH ANTHROPIC NATURE X LIBRARY (PUBLIC) A x j NURSING HOME OR RESIDENCE NOIE FOR HOED x i SCHOOL. PRIVATE PRIMARY CA SECONDARY x SCHOOL, BUSINESS OR TTiADE ACCESSORY BUILDING X X % COMMUNITY EI~TEA (PRIVATE) % t ELECTRICAL SUeSTAT10N X ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION LINE % FIELD OR CONBTRUCT)ON OFFICE rTE11P0f~11R'A % FIR STATION OR SIMILAR PtJ9llC BUILAKdO % GAS TRANSMISSION LINE AND M STATION x LOCAL UTILITY U13 RIBUTION LINES x % % X X OFF.STREET PARKING IN= AL MAC USE % PRIVATE UTILITY SHOP OR STORAGE YARD PUBLIC BUILDING, SHOP, YARD LOCAL x STATP, OR FEDERAL GONER" W X RADIO ANO TELEVISION OR MICRO wAve TOWER % SEWAGE PUMPING STATION % SW4MMING FOOL (PRiVA X LEPHON$. BUSINESS OFFICe TELEPHON LINE d EXCHANGE 5'MI NCB OR x RELAY STATION WX~'fEA RfiSkRV IR (f~AOUND OR ATBD). `HATER X PUMPING STATION, OR WELL X TELECOMMUNICATIO RECf~EA710NAt ANDri~lB~T"~t x" AMUSEMENT, COMMERCIAL IOUTDOCllrt x AMUSEMENT. COMMERCML(INOOOA % COUtdTAY GLU (PRIV m WITH GOLF COURSE x DANE HAU.OR NIGHT CLU x GOLF COURSE (COMMERCSAU x ROLLER OR IC 99 ATING RINK x j SWIM OR I9C LUB x HEATER. O m T1fAN ORIV IN TYPE 1 Of 3 ~H. C.;npl.'...y w Applicable Development Standard a m c Permitted Land Use 3 o a) 0 TRANSPORTATIONRELA TED" USES: HELIPAO X BUS STATION OR TERMINAL I X HAULING OR STORAGE COMPANY I X MOTOR FREIGHT TERMINAL I X RAILROAD PASS"cNGER S T ATION l I X RAILROAD TRACK OR RISHT•OF•WAY Y, a PARKING LOT OR STRUCTURe (COMMERCIAL) X AUTOMOSILESERVICE USES- AUTOLAUNORY(CAR WASH) X AUTO PAINTING AND BODY REPAIR X j AUTO GAt ES AND REPAIR IIN BUILOING) X GASOLINE SERVICE STATION _ X NEW AUTO PARTS SALES STORES X I NEW OR USED CASALES LOT(INOPEN % SEAT COVER AND MUFFLER INSTALLATION SHOP X USED AUTO PARTS SALES (IN BUILO)NG) X Re A Aaa sERNC~TYF'EftlsBS;' , " ~ ANTIQUE SHOP X BAKERY OR CONFECTIONERY SHOP (RETAIL 1 X CA.F RIA X CLEANING AND PRESSWG SMALL SHOP ANO PICKUP X t CUSTOM PERSONAL SERVICE SHOP X DRAPERY, NEEDLEWORK OR WEAVING SHOP X FLORIST OR GARDEN SHOP X GAEENHOUSE OR PLANT NURSERY (RETAIL) X HANDICRAFT SHOP X j HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE SERVICE AND AEoAIR % LAUNDRY OR CLEANING SELF SERVK X MIMEOGRAPH, STATIONEAY OR SHOP X X i MORTUARY OR FUNERAL PARLOR OFFICES, PRO ESSIONAL,ANDADMMNSTRATIVH X OFF PREM~ IS6 SALE OF SEER AJIOIOR WWE X ON PREMISE NALIE 00 88 ANO/OA WWE x LICENSED PAIVATE CLUB X PAWN SHOP % ESTAUAANT X ItCO-TAIL STORES AND SHO X RETAIL IN OFFICE SLOW. A MAX V% OF GA03 A X STUDIO OR PHOTOGRAPHER, MUSkNAN, ARTIST OR HEALTH X SECONDHAND STOR , USED PURNITURE OR RUMMAGE SALE X T L OR TRAILER AE AL X 2 of 3 - ii /f~9 t'IY_y + I V App(icabla Development Slandard 07 m C Permitted Land Use ~ n ,y ro c: cj p l :2 Z AGR (CULTURAL`. LYPE: USES ANIMAL CLINIC OR HOSPITAL _ i (NO OUTSIDE RUNS OR PENS) X ANIMA4 CLINIC, HOSPITAL OR KENNEL WITH OUTSIDE RUNS OR PENS (North of WWgSI# 0*) X FARM OR RANCH X OREENHOUSF OR PLANT NURSERY X z>. COMMERCIAL se,... BAKERY (WHOLESAM X BUILDING ?6ATEAIAL SALES X CABINET AND UPHOLSTERY SHOP x CLEANING AND DYEING PLANT (COMMERCIALI x CLEANING PLANT. BAGS OR CARPETS ~ (SPECIAL EOUIPMENT) % CLOTHING A.ANUFACTURE OR LIGHT COMPOUNDING OR FABRICATION % ENGINE AND MOTOR REPAIRING (Now within $00 (to ot WMt~wts SubdMNOrt) % Fig() STOR a X HEAVY MACHINERY SALES AND STORAGE ( Na wNNn S00 Nr or W Subt7Mslbnl X J08 KINT1NG LO _8 NEWSPAPER PAINTING X LAUNDRY PLANT (COMMERCIAL) MLK DEPOT. DAIRY OR ICE CREAM PLANE % PAINTS P x PETROLEUM PRODUCTS (PACKAGE ( VMMe w"ouSALl PLUMBING SHOP % SCI NTIFIC OR RESEARCH LABORA ORI S X STOAT lE OR SALES WAREHOUM x TRAILER RENTAL OR SALES IEru MM FIOnINI X ' NSFI=.9f STORAGE AND E TERMINAL X j WHOLESALE OFFICE AND AOOM % GENSRAL M4NUFAC"A4WiAJYQ usim LIGHT MANUFACTURING OR lIQ IAL LIS WHICH MEET THE PERFORMANCE STANCAADS PRESM18110BY 19. 1$A. 1 THROUGH I X ETT El ev+tt+~~wK,•~tia,o 3of3 'A, 1 { lj f At r ' e1wodN9\69131 { 's { RESOLUTION NO. - A RESOLUT XpANDING THE BOUNDARIES OFApTHE NORTHERN OURBAIJECENTERT PLAN BY E AMENDING THE OUNDARItS OANDNPR VSITY IDINGRk'OR1ANOEFFECTIVEXDATEF THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN; has petitioned ment WHEREAS, the Rancho Vista DeVelO! foro 945 6 cares located the City of Denton for a zoning area 29 as defined and within the NoroofetheUDent neDevelopment Planlyand r by Appendix A the Concept the zoning change would require amending WHEREAS, the boundaries of the Northern Urban Center and Map expanding amenddi ng the boundaries of intensity area 191 and and Zoning Commission has recommended WHEREAS, the Planning THEREFORE, approval of the alnendmentg: NOW, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES. That the Concept Map of the Denton Development the boundaries of the Northern Urban plan is amended by expanding center as shown on map #1 attached hereto. i SECTION II. That Appendix A of the Denton Development flan is adopting the boundaries for intensity area 19 as shown emended by ora map #2 attached hereto- That this resolution shall become effective im- 111, i ggC.Tup its passage and approval. ediately m t day of 1991. ~ PASSED AND APPROVED this the BOB CASTLEB-eRRY, MAYOR I 4 l ATTESTS CITY SECRETARY JENNIFER WALTERS, BY: PROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AP { DEBRA A. pRAYOVI'1CH, CITY ATTORNEY j BY. 3 N 4 ~ 112 g i 1- f Northern Urban enter' woo' :v 13 10 f J 20 - . l 17 18 19 ~ c 22 23 < I I~ I 1 S' I 4 1 ~ Map ~ ~s , } { 7 f,, ~ y~{~_g~~ a ~,a . ,'i ik7, ~ ` i~n4"I ~ •=F. 11 iv'• k I w ~.•'1 fir" ' . ~ d r..:;. _ i., s t N br J .fi _ _I x ;',:Yr ,A~4{r~F1 *Yt~dS~~a{~~Ca`ay' ~ c r - - s~ L"~d~l1a.:~^~.~'~".t.G~i~l9ftf~vA~~31;'fll.X':_'.:i~...~~i3..1.~~x ~iX~~LSt~~t~C4]f~.Y~:.K~iAI'~f~~~ - - - - x a .ar.tt".C.~k $''-G'it,»ri'i:a➢;x..a~a 21 JG ~ .r. i rI'f~ .iYt,l~ 1 .Y • ~ I , , 1, L~ lE e I r ' i 1 1. 1 I 1 1 j I Y' f i ~ 3 Il ~ PAP ~ ~ ~/8 11 ~ `r'ubr'n9 • TLob►~9 1~+ ll~n~ Uoorx P10 V Jf ~ P • 1' me. ,1L.11. Co/a.,,ns S.E /n C4ncr~eEe I°isnt' 3°"DseP, YZ°' i L. -7-5eo-l"! !50~77=,UC7L//= l,4L 1. Nr~ Z x 7' Psrronn s l ,Door ,101' 1 t~ rP 00, Lo y =Its, LDOf~i ~~(~.~LN !tii -~,9 • sk~I ~9hts ~ ~ 11 C3c1f.~lr.~' ~f ,~14C1f ~idC .L iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiijilljIIIIIIIIIIIII 0.111,~~Jjjjjjff f t{t t • 7~ ' r. , Ir. D:rr n Mee.~s :.The f3 ~r~vir~srrr~.nt~c • ~ ' ~ ~ T`his D*tiyn i << s C t 1 ,1^ A1151 tic ~§'-.P: I~i e, i .u_ r r . ih r - ~r L r l ~X ' f , ' t: ~ i. { f r , ,~f ~ r, r z. n ` .f ,b1LriSA a;.f, a .l.. ~ ;•-i~a.~.d lay A SOMME w' ti ir. I~ ~s 3 1 k I i vie , C / ~Olumn,S a, rp c r Ile, ( C-OA l szyk," -7 0' . 4-Ye 4'~e' 11 ile 'of .0 1 oe 100 .01 ~t 33/f 11 U 114 1~2ir - i-l~ Ile h 1 % r IF ill e ° 11 X11 , . % . .,S I~ I ;t' % } c ~ 0 ' E 44 .r ~ 1 I J ~ I =IlI~II~llll~l;~-,_ ~ ~II1 ~ _lk ° i Or /I 2' 7 d/le 44 I ° I Co/umn P~ ~r ' E~ E ~ J ` _ ~ J T d . - 5°rj~2rr s i I Cp/u,r1n Column I f~ to d1. Ni 5~ 41 1i~Er~ .5 6a 18 r! EW Y/411 11 it r~ - ,01. 77f 4r lop c 4 Nly 401 . Ifl s s's fly 1• ~4 r` i t 411 r' c !I~ 1 t Cus~+,o^ .sang ILI 217 2 r/ [US`r1rOry ,Sand II ~ r- ~ ~ 1 1 r j~ i - ._..,g,q~1~,cr~_ rim,, illy =i = off I~~ =fu j i21i s r , CaiB~~ EW, ~ Column P~'er a ~V it 7~ • ~ Y i i i r ~ J all Cush~a~ ..j:L~•'~T i t i APPOO 0 " ONAWII W mfrs : DAM I r ~a/t STAI CA::L.EI9 - i~- r / akv~ "Mom cso ~ c' ~un ~a,n 2 ,f' 4~ 4 I fi r i low v " ralodt>'otr MS20 •14 x M ' .:mow ait a ♦ ' X. .fL.J ! 'i ~l. C1$ N.':: L 4\~ ♦ G ~.4 as r M~ rr ..(that ..~^~rr `..r yr 1 5 , 1 Ik r4. i - i f C l i Y we I "i t to E ~y i PD-R0 1 1 I Ir _rryrrrr_rrrrr ~r 1 WEST AT 1 A A BOOM I ~ 1 { j i IS -16 PD-115 1 PINEY R( 1 { 4r {--rrr_r crw/r J 1 H f W 1 A { j PD-113 InteaSi ty Area #.19 ` r•w•rr_rry f frrr 1 A SF'-7 1 1 wu r~ oR 1 1 A { { PD-86 ♦do 1 {y ; S i.rrrrrrrr fItJA li wrrnr w..~rw www ~ ~ f A I ~ y•rrij ~Iw ' 'L1 C r r C Map 2 ~ 1 PD-1 ) 1+rr rrr w_w ,rrrrr rrr 1+ fl// ~ GR EVE Y 5 R~ W i i A v Cdr i. DATES 07/16/91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Mayor and Members of the City Council TO: Lloyd V. Harrellr City ManageY FROM' E CoopER LANDING SUOD "15TONt SUBJECT: pROMILOTSR6AAANDF66, BLOCKA11 O TINTOHLOT 6R RECOM = rovalr 5-or at its commiarton recommended aPP j The planning and Zoning l 1991 meeting. 1 June 26( Su)4MARYI ermit asingle-family home The tkaat is zone 7D-72 Which does not p d in this location. ?,n &mehemamendment would makeeMakeieingleufamily this evening's agenda. use on this ono lot parmissable. ACKOROUNDI t t Acces Will be Vi The proposed lot is noW vacan , cut onsCedar Hill,a an easement on the north, and an existing cu er, gasr sanitary sewer, ate available. Previously, City serVioea and facilltiesr including wat , telephone, eleotrieal, and solid waster ; other lots in the subdivision have been replattod to create large lots. uirements of the Denton { { The replat conforms to the minimum ref ! % } Subdivision and Land DeVOIGPIAent Regulations 1 P OGRAMS DBPARTMBNTS OR GROUPS AFFLCTEDt 4 N/A j FISCAL' N/A ape u1 1Y e❑ m tedl L Yd V* Harrell Manager C tY , Prop O, Owen YOStr ASLA Urban Planrek Apps v dl f rank H. Rob friar AICP 6xeautIva Director plenning and Development 2725% 1 s ATTACHMENT 1 P 91-019 Cooper Landing NORTH 1 cot 70 Mw EX I M INS ' EXISTING ALLEY 1 PD~12 for v" a lot Js cor SA 1 COOPER L- Z- ,wrAw rrqAMAr ~'erio'aD'"E; or/it r.R. 11640431 .431 Mr,7 MI' u.e.w z kz' uar CA C01" LAMM ~E for 91 4 dCK T r• o arc r rAa RrreA LJUaT1 1' COW, SIDEWALK Q" M AMES ~ ~ _ a Ia P.R. 111 2 0 !or CA fie, f Its 39" N 119.10' CURVE 01 A - 905.10' L + 12.00' 0 - 04632'22' Ch . S 01156130" E 11,96' .r L y WIND OR DRIVE 90' A.O.N. ss~ Ala XONJTNO sar STRICKLANO JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Preliminary Plat i h I t I , t 1 q OAM 9N3191 SCAL9: NONE 0-11 1 ATTACHMENT 2 P 91-019 Cooper Landing NORTH EM~9r~NC cor 79 18' P. A. U. E. .............tar lA O for SA for rar er oar s i coakv► {.AAGU71tq L . _ - _ _ _ - . r~e P.R. Ar 9 4l'/ate • 9 f u.E. J r'I LOT 6R W w ~ f z'x4' u.E. a `Or 1!► BLOCK 1 , onr 1 cor m h a 0.196 ACRES .o E'EEI . J 1 CLOVE 01 N Ni4 /6 M r F1 909.70' C - 72.00' IPOB A • a/•3a' za• - s of •e~'~9" a 71.9a' c►, _ WINDSOR DR.rVE $0' A.0.W. j Final Rapist S i DATE: 6/13191 SCALE; NONE i P&Z Minutes June 26, 1991 Page 4 8. Holt a public hearing and consider a recommendation concerning the preliminary and final replats of the Cooper Landing Addition, Section 11, Lots 6A and 68, Block 1, into Lot 6R. Staff Report Mr. Yost stated that this is the replat for the zoning case just considered by the Commission. The Development Review Committee is recommending tpproval. Petitioner; Bud Hauptmann of Metroplex Engineering stated that he was available to answer quest ons. s n'a one was present to speak in favor or in opposition to the reptat, Vice-chairman Holt closed the public hearing, Mr. Engelbrecht moved to recommend approval of the replat of the preliminary and final replats of the Cooper Landing Addition, Section II, Lots 6A and 681 Block. 1 into Lot 6R. Motion was seconded by Mr, Kamman and unanimously carried (5-0). III, Hold a public hearing and consider a recommendation for a minor amendment to the detailed plan of a portion of Planned Development 5. The amendment would allow a storage building and additional parking on 2.117 acres for the De Berry Funeral Home. Nineteen notices were mailed to property owners within 200' of the site; three were received in favor, two were in opposition, and two did not indicate a position. Mr, Yost reported that planned development zoning was established on this tract in 1969. There is an existing development and no added infrastructure is necessary. The petitioner is asking for storage room to be built plus additional parking, The applicant has agreed to k remove the driveway shown on the north side of the site plan. It will be removed before the hearing by City Council, Petitioner; Bill DeBerry, Jr, stated that they are planning to add parking and storage, The second phase would a I I o w a garage for the limos and hearses, The hedgerow on the south property line will eventually be six feet tali. They wanted the driveway shown on their site plan to allow access to the hedgerow for maintenance purposes, They do not plan to access Emery, He is willing to take the drive off of the site plan but would prefer to keep it. ;i•l r DATES 07/16/91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT l..f TO. Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager € SUBJECTS REZONING ,196 ACRIS OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT N0. 72 TO SINGLE-FAMILY 7, i I RECOMMBNDATIONt j Planning and zoning Commission recommended 5-0 at its June 26, 1991 { meeting that the tract be rezoned to single-family 7, conditioned on roplatting. SUMMARY[ The current PD will be reduoed by ,196 acres, Otherwise, there is no change in the plan for PD-72, j BACKGROUND: The proposed SF-7 site is scheduled to be used ae a single-family j homes upon replatting. The detailed plan of PD-72 was originally approved in 1984 and will be modified by this action, PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED[ None { j j FISCAL IMPACTi Ij N/A ly gUbtgit~edt ~I 4V.uH__ i Prepar0dl^~J': / arrell City Hanagdr I ~ V E a. Oman Yost, AS Urban Planner n AppCO r j N, Ro bins, AICP 1 Pr sxeoutive Director Planning and Development i 2732x f 1 T- w - r µ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT Tot Mayor and members of the city council Case No.: Z-91-009 Meeting Datet July 16, 1991 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Metroplex Engineering t 1123 Fort Worth Drive Denton, Tx 76205 Current Owner: John and Donna Jeanea E 3100 Inglewood Denton, TX 76201 Requested Action: Amend the Concept Plan and approve a II Detailed Plan for Planned Development No. 721 platted as Cooper Landing, changing ! the use from duplex to single family, Location and Sixes .196 acres on the northwest 'corner of r Windsor Drive and Cedar Hill Road. surrounding Land Use and Zonings f e North - PD-72 proposes duplex/4-plex user currently it is vacant. South - Right-of-Way of Windsor Drive across from which is Strickland Jr. High School. East - Right-of-way of Cedar Hill Road, across from which are two residences. West - Residences in accordance with PD-72. Denton Development Plans a r Low intensity area No, 26. t SPECIAL INFORMATION f Transportations 1 No additional infrastructure is needed due to this amendment. Access will be by an existing, paved, eaeement onto Cedar Hill Road. . Utilities: s 1 No additional infrastructure is needed to support the proposed amendment. T_. T k 1 (Case Z-91-009) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued) i. Drainages No additional infrastructure is needed to support the proposed amendment. HISTORY The ! The original planned development was approved in 1984. concept plan designated the subject area for duplexes/4-plexes. ANALYSIS The amendment will decrease the need for additional j infrastructure and decrease intensity allocated in study area 26 by one unit or 10 intensity trips. PD 72 does not qualify as a development plan, therefore Council must approve the concept plan amendment and this detailed plan. A condition in PD 72 states that site plans are not required for single family or i duplex development. The department may waive required detailed plan information if it finds it unnecessary for proper consideration of the petition. The Department has waived information concerning buildings and landscaping. of lLOother 61 information required is sh own on preliminary preliminary plat is Block It Cooper Landing, Section also serving as the detailed plan. Amending the concept plan for PD 72 and adopting SP 7 standards for this area amounts to a rezoning from PD to SF 7. Until the replat is recorded, lots 6A and 6B will. not meet the area standards for a SF 7 lot. Lots 6A and 6B are not 7,000 square feet, not are they at least 60 feet wide. When lots 6A and 60 are replatted into one lot, lot 6R, and this replat is recorded in county records, the lot will conform to sF area standards. RECOMMENDATION Rather than recommending a detailed plan for PD 72 (Attachment 4), the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends rezoning from PD to SF 7 for iota 6A and 6B, Block Cooper Landing, Section 2 with the condition that these lots be replatted into one lot (alternative 1 below) and amending the PD ; 72 Concept Plan. n .ems-r:y f (case 2-91-009) Page Three ALTERNATIVES 7 with rezoning from pn to SF 1, the approval of Recommend , r conditions. revel of the amendment. ent 2, Recommend approval of the PD amendm with conditions. 3. Recommend approval Postpone consideration. 5, Recommend ti ATTACHMENTS z Location amPpof pD-72 1 2. Concept 3. Amended concept mapdevelopment standards s , Detailed plan with 1991, 4 ordinaommissf°n Minutes of June 26~ g original d 6. planning and zoning { - - - - - - - - - - - - 3477k l k 1 +e ,4 131 ATTACH61ENT 1 Z 91-009 Cooper Landing NORTH _ CT, x ff ~ ~ Iw d8N0ok a l IE-0 a pA0 pl W B ~ ~ . ELL _ SCHL. C3 VIILLAQS s EVER5 u N PARK M P5 sl = EDAR H?L WOLFTRAP DR. N OD / WINDSOR WIND S04 .a WINDSWEPT u~6o STRICKLAND SCHOOL NDF L E N BROOK W CIR DRIFTWOOD TRAIL CHISHOLM TRAIL i CORDOYA M S Z ORR C CORONAOO OR. CRt; HERITAGE 7-1 ~C EOGE41000 LLI [i, P EACH N. OWEMS LN. GREENWOC DATE; 6/10/91 S SALE; None I ( 1 4 ATTACtIMENT 2 , _ Muew>f , M i I2Li6 AOMfsIN i11[111e 4CM CO 4C~'/fM f. W 777 + all IN COOMIY 06 09""14 TWO I M it 4 MMOLE FAMILY 1 ' w 4dlf~ rw , r. , 1 ~ Lt 'trN i 3 ~,,,,FLOOGWAY/OPIN>SPACS ~ --4~ S~MMII-14MIW hill t u r/~nlw ' ion l u~w I I ~ I wy~ fix' r ~yY.nS y~1 ~L~n'IAMIiv'f If~i1MM\I't M~wyM,..rt'v14w 4~ft'air~M!o~r` to. f uru •rf M~"!~A~ 17 1 i Mu ~ a !lkA,p ~wlwrlrr„irr 414 ASM~ s 'r Iw.N wlrl.fr.r,w.•,l 1 r11111rN,N~ I~Nrfr/rlrf I Illiflrfr l~t~ ~1r IlN I,rrlrlrlr wlr r wl I 1 2f p h1 i `p ATTACHMENT 3 Z .91-M Cooper Landing NORTH GARDEN HOMES 1ttt+au-~a~ri~r art~,a~eo1 y y A)# WTT Lilts i MULTI-FAMILY DU1~um, PtAx .11 Nsr~rr.11 ~ ~ f w w~uM wer~r~aw i i 1 1~1t Aellq 1R.f~'Mf,•MM;ti7P t ~ 01196 ACRES , ~ , T*LEW00 Y is.* 1 MfIHOt011 +~r~r„~ Z1~~ eo~Naa L.o t' (aR eisrR~ S7-AsIDARDS. L~1t3H v%Of'9 w 1►~~auw Nr. ~IIMI A 4s 14 "AN$ ur1.r1~ir1r1V a tttl./ NIr1rIwIw/4/c11rtl1~~wlw1 /r~w~rlr~~ ~r/1~~w1i~M1~Ir/n11M~N/r Amended Concept Plan i DATE; B/~oJ9t SCALE; Norte 3 1 ATTACHMENT Q i Detailed Plan and development standards for l..at 6R Block I Cooper Land/ng Section Two, a part of PD-72 Lot is sss EXIVING EX Is I IM! ALLEY P0-7? Lot iA d Lot 1.0 Lo/ 5A 1 BLOCK! , COMER LANOIN6 . 3WION rM0R£PLAT ~9 F/JF P,R, I I e.eo' F+Dr7.2.... Or ef/ UU I "4'w41 U.E. W•:I 2'v2' 'r 6R b B5i d UCK.2,. Lot re o XCT d W, fW "O'LAr r,R, EX1511 A' COW. SLOEWALX b~ : e I 0 96 ACRES _ of 4.1 1W I .FT Lot sA PD.72 i L - 92,070 ' L 72 Ch S 01'06':9' E 71.9(!' I " f /S WIND OR DRIVE so, Plo.wl Ad z0NINS STRICKL.AND JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL. DevelQp@nt Standards All standards and permitted uses of the Single Family-7 (SF-7) zoning district in effect on the effective date of the detailed plan. Such standards and permitted uses are adopted herein by reference. l I 4. ATTAC11MENT 5 OTC r1 AN ORDLNANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAY OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, WAS ADOPTED APPENDIX TO THE CODE OANURASNSIAIDSMAP AS SANE BY ORDINANCE N0. 69. THE CITY OF DEMON, T SB TEXAS ; AND NO 16 DN COU, APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 127.484 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE B.H.H. MO RER,PARTICUTARLSUR Y DE CRIH6DA HEREIN !8 D DECLARING 'AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ~ THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: C f SECT^ 1ON I The Zoning Classification and Use dagignation of the following described property, to-wits arcel of land situated in the TRACT 11 All that certain tract Abstract No. 186 in the City and b C.R.R. Company Survey, g Couunt6y5 °acr e t act Tand spartof as dcalled 40.891 aara otract called 10 9 k tracts dascribed in dedVolfrom uo 541 N Page 6542 And 655 of the Dead Razor, at al recorded In Texas; the said tract being morn Records of Denton County, particularly described as follows: BEGINNING for the northwest corner of the track 695 being described hernia, at the northwest corner of the Bald 100.N Highway No. 1 line of F.. Said point being in the east right4nforsaoelon with the north line 1164 (North Locust street) at its northerly 26.3 fa of the said B.B at Prom an S . C.R.R. SurNly, , i^ .B k iron rod found aC A fence corner; -11 ddst got to a THENCE &0%,a tract8and'Ithe northtiline ofnthehsaidnB.H.B, tfeC Rsaid Co. Survey sad a distance of 1401.66 eha said 100.695 acre tract') the most northerly northeast THENCE touts dia rsaan' o w I it line est i 55 feet e i fence corner eaid 100.695 j acre tract a distance of 312.31 k °02'08" east along a fence THENCE south B8 fast to an iron rod found at a fence corner for the mast easterly northeast corner of the said 100.695 act* tract; seeing At THENCE south 01°01'00" west along an old fence line, p and continuing ornar e saidf40,891aACV* tract, sou tract and feet along the same course, in all, tetotal tea north .set corners of th north 11n distance of f,4indaor2Drive as rod sat for corner in th an iron , monument on the ground, p~veEandiataacs4of311709 48 Easthto Ansironnrodhfound itfthieneast right-of-way line of F.M. 2164 (North Locust Street); using north E .m. 2164 and the west) lino of the Said 40 8911acrs tract, pas of at 565 its northwest corner, same bean the sou thi Rime Course. the said 100.695 acre tract and contiqu ng along in all t of in she ece of 10 2,26 fast to an iron rod found at an n~gic p north 2164 and1the west line ofg thetsaid 100 east 695 right- tracts Z-1626-JOE BELEW-PAGE ONE 4 V 3 5. a r' a distance of 2526.52 feet to the place of beginning and enclosing 123.352 acres of land. TRACT 2: All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the a.1.3. Q C.R.R. Company Survey, Abstract No. 186 is the City and County of Denton, Texas; the said tract being a part of the called 40.891 acre tract described in the deed from J. Newton Razor to Jesse Newton Razor, at al recorded in Volume 541, Page 655 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; the said tract being more particularly described as follows: ' r BEGINNING for the southwest corner of the tract being described herein, at an iron rod set for the southwest corner of the said 40.891 acre tract, said point being in the east right-of-way line of F.H. Highway 2164 (North Locust Street); THENCE north 00°23'00" east with the test right-of-way line of f P.M. 2164 and the west line of the, said 40.891 amts tract a distance of 410.97 fat to an iron rod set in the mouth line of Windsor Drive me monumented on the groued; THENCE south 89°40'30" east with the south line of Windsor Drive a ' distance of 438.28 feet to an iroa rod found in the west line of the tract described in the deed from Jesse Newton Rasor, or. a1 to Denton Independent School District recorded in Volume $351 Page 558 of the said Deed Records; j THENCE soutch 00°53'08" west with the vast line of the said Denton Independent School District tract a distance of 413.71 feet to an iron red found at an angle point in the south line of the said 40.891 acre tract; THENCE north 89°19'00" west with the south line of the said 40,891 acre tract and aloe a fence part of the way a distance of 434,65 r feet to the place of beginning and enclosing 4.132 acres of land, . is hereby changed from Agricultural "A" District Classification Use to Planned Development "PD" District Classification and Use I under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas with the following conditions and specifications: ' 1. Sixty (60) feet of right-of-way shall be dedioated for sal? Avenue. k 2. Final utility layout, street alignment, curb out and driveway locations, and overall plans for access shall be determined during the site plan approval and/or plat processing stage. 3. The floodway/open space area (with exception of the drainage channel), landscaped eul-de-sane mad entries shall be privately maintained. The City of Donten must review and approve a written proposal or agreement outlining specific maintenance responsibilities before building permits era issued. 4. Duplexes fronting Windsor Drive shall be single story and must conform with normal City of Denton zoning ordinance requirements. 5, Single family section shall conform to SF-7 soning ordinance standards. 6. Unless otherwise approved as part of the PD proposal, the multi-family sect ion'<Nshall conform with mr-l zoning ordinance standards, 7, specific site plan approval is waived for all two family f and singio family land use,; speeifio.site plan approval a.l1eA. imp no t~d.aarr "jo , required for multi-Esmklys neighborhood service and garden ~ home sactionr. ; g, omea t bridge extended across the floodwsy/open space Pod y use of dam required for the detention pond. b 9. Sidewalks along both aides of ROIL Aveaus. r an 10. Sidewalks constructed sidewalks along oona aidag Of all aided windsor Drive; throughout the development, streets shall be required roved PD concept 1 11, The development ahall conform with the aQp plan. 12• If 25 percent of the developments with a minimum of(( )5 percent single is not daYevious agwithin f ricultural (A) years zoning ill never to it P { claeal£l.cation. tad the 14th City o Denton~ 'Cizea, adopted The Zoning Map of the dix of January, 19691 as an Appen to Cha Cod 64 1,Q be,masod6the the city of Denton) Texas, under Ordinance No. same in District Claraifica- ns it hereby amended to ahew such ohangs above oonditiona and specifications# nd d me and ere y a Subject to t II SECTION II. i That the City Council of the City of Dalton, Toxaa, hereby finds that such changethsrdance+liwolgaremoE the eiCit Of for rho purpose of promoting gg sxar, and with rueoaabls conaidand for is peculiar Denton, th for the character of andd with a view toreonsorvingthe f; suitability or particular us*$$ ting human liver, and encouraging maximum benefit to the value of the buildings, P the most appropriate uses of land for the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens' SECTION That this ordinance andle brov 1 P the re4 ired publio hearings ag ately after its passage PP Commission g wadi the CiCy fCouacit ofe the yCitya flDsn lton Max e ni after giving due notice thereof. k u-- day of E , 1984. PASSED AND APPROVED this the CI OF ENI'M TEXAS ATTESTS CITY Or DENTOTEW APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM C. J. TAYLOR JR., CITY CITY of Der6m, T E ~ BY ~l 2.1626-JOE SELEW-PAGE TREE . t , f PST Minutes D D AFT June 26, 1991 Page 2 Mr, Holt clarified that the reason the plat was removed from the consent agenda is because the detailed plan has not been approved by Council, Mr. Yost said yes. I It was moved by Mr. Holt, seconded by Mr. Appleton, and unanimously carried (5-0) to approve the final replat of the Denton North Addition from Unit 1, Block 1 into Lots 1-E and 1-W. Mr, Appleton asked if the adjoining property owners know t about the proposed replat of the Fry Street Addition, Mr. Yost replied that the neighbors are aware of it but no notice is required. Mr. Appleton requested that the neighbors be notified. } The Commission approved the remaining consent agenda ' consisting of. A. The vacation of the replat of Lot 13R, creating Lots 12 and 13 of the Forrestridge, Addition, Section II, and r B. The preliminary plat of the Josten's Addition, Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block A and the final plat of Lot 2. 1 II, Cooper Landing A. Z-91-009 Hold a public hearing to consider a I recommendation of a minor amendment to the concept pplan and pprove a detailed plan for a portion of Planned Deavelopment 72. The amendment would allow a single family home at a specific location of the Cooper Landing Addition, Section II. Twenty-eight notices were mailed to property owners within 200' of the site; none were received back in reply. Mr. Robbins stated that the petition is for an amendment to the concept plan and for approval of a detailed plan for a portion of PD-72, PD-72 has a f condition that no site plan is required for single family and duplex uses. Staff has waived all requirements except what is required for a preliminary plat, All standards of a SF-7 zoning district would apply to this site. Staff recommends amending the concept plan by deleting this site from PD-72 and rezoning it SF-7, It is a cleanor administrative approach, j j j F a P&Z Minutes DRA5r June 26, 1991 T page 3 Mr. Appleton said that such a rezoning could create a domino effect. Would staff want to do this type of amendment every time? Mr. Robbins said possibly. What is before the Commission is a request to build a single family home i in a PD that says no site plan is required. Whether the property is zoned PD or SF-7, the result is the same. The only difference 1s the fee for a downzoning and the fee for a detailed plan amendment, It wi11 be administratively easier to do 11 a rezoning. Normally, a PD does not have straight ; zoning di,trict standards. i Mr. Appleton asked what percentage of the PO has not j been developed. Mr. Robbins said that he does not think it is legally enforceable to have reversion zoning, The proper ; pvocess must be followed. Mr. Appleton asked if there are any provisions in the, j PD now. Mr. Robbins said no. } t Mr. Yost stated that the preliminary plat doubles as the detailed plan. No further infra-structure is required. Staff recommends approval of rezoning to hntthe o 1 condition large ti single a family s lotA and 68 be replatted i i , Petitioner: John Jeanes, 3100 Inglewood, stated that he lives on the cul-de-sac adjacent to the lots in ; question. He currently Helives wishes In atodupuex sand the lots are behind him. will put family home on the two lots. Eventually, he U witil put a duplex on two other lots that he owns, any other are in hanges. pHisehouseeplais not ns are avai qqlable i,~g c No was was present to speak in favor or in opposition { to the petition. Vice-chairman Holt closed the public hearing, Motion was made by Mr, Appleton, seconded by Mr. t b + Glasscock, and unanimously carried (6-0) to recommend 6A 7 and 686 with of n replatting portion n lots PD-72 tlher condition rezoning i 1 iii w [rat 1 ' 'r 1 v ejupdow\79101July 10, 1991 ORDINANCE NO. AMENDING THE BOUNDARIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT N0. 72, AS ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. 84-50, BY DELETING 0.196 ACRES FROM THE DISTRICT) ADOPTING A REVISED CONCEPT PLAN SHOWING THE NEW DISTRICT BOUNDARIES; CHANGING THE LOPMENT TO 811,4 FAMILYN (SF 7) THE PROVIDING FORDAFPENALTYN INDTHE DEVEMAXIMUM AMOUNTGOF I \ I $22,000; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That Section I of Ordinance No. 84-50 is amended to read as follows: Section 1. The zoning cane an use desig property, - nation of the following described sit TRACT 11 All that certain tract or parcel Abstract No uated in the B.B.B. & C.R.R. Company Survey, 186 in the city and County of Denton, Texasi the said tract being all of a called 100.695 acre tract and part i of a called 40.891 acre tract, both tracts described in, deed from J. Newton Razor to Jesse Newton Razor, et al. recorded in Volume 541, Page 654 and 655 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; the said tract being more particularly described as follows: i BEGINNING for the northwest corner of the tract being described herein, a northwest the said i 100,695 acre tract, No, 2164 (North Locust of-way line of F.M. Highway Street) at its intersection with the no t3 feline et of than said B.B.B. & C.R.R. Survey, northerly 26. from iron rod found at a fence cornert THENCE south 89'26126" east with the north line of the said 100.695 acre tract and the north line of the said S,B.B, & C.R.R. Co. Survey and a distance of 1401.66 feet northerly northeast to an iron o 100, 695 acre o tract corner of the said ' THENCE south 01°18'34" west with the west line of the said 100.695 acre tract a distance of 2558.55 feet to a fence corner; THENCE south 88'02108" east along a fence a distance of of thecsaidr 312.31 northeast corner at the most 100.695 acre tract; 1 i 7 E southeast corner of the line, THENCE Bt 4901 feet the west along an old ti passing at 100.695 acre tract and the northeast co trner of he sametcoursea 40.891 acre tract, and continuing along 1026.32 in alit a total for corner distance ill tnorth line ofe Windsor Driveras set fo he monument on the grou THENCE north 89°40'30" west with 4hefaetdtooanhironerod Windsor Drive a distance of 1709. North found in the east right-of-way line of F.M. 2164 Locust street)1 s g t the a r TineCofnFKMh 2~643and1thewestline ofthesaid 40.891 acre tract, passing at 565 feet at its northwest corner, ti ' same being the southwest corner of the said 100.695 acre treat and continuing along the same courser in all, a total distance of 1072.26 feet to an iron rod found at an angle point in the said line; THENCE north 01°28'46" east continuing with the east right-of-way line of 7.14. 2164 and the west line of the said 100,'695 acre tract a distance of 2526.52 feet to the place of beginning and enclosing 123.352 acres of land; SAVE AND EXCEPT all of Lots 6A and 6B, Block It Cooper i Landing, Section Two an addition to the City of Denton, Texas, according to the replat recorded ain cabinet F, Page 180 Plat Records, Denton County, tract or parcel of land sit- certain TRACT ~,f 411 that Survyr Abstract No. uated in the B.B.B. & C.R.R. company Texasl the said i 186 in the City and County of Denton, tract being a part of the called 40.891 acre tract des- cribed in the deed from J. Newton Rap ge 6to Jesse 55 of theeDeed Razor, et al recorded in Volummea5541, P said tract being Records of Denton County, e; the more particularly described as followst BEGINNING for the described at can wiron crod eset for k the tract s uthwest corner of the said 40.891 acre tract, said point being in the east right-of-way line of F.M. Highway 2164 (North Locust Street)1 TCofnorth F . M. 211643and1thesWesttlineeofathersaid-40.891. line acre tract a distance of 410.97 feet to an iron rod set PAGE 2 3 I v. ` . 1411: LF :'C r in the south line of Windsor. Drive as 1110numented on the grounds THENCE soul-h 89°40'30" east with the south line of iron rod of 438.28 feet to an Windsor Drive a dlinenof the tract described in the deed found in the west et al to Denton independent 558 of the from Jesse Newton Razor, i School District recorded in Volume 535, page said Deed R2cordst THENCE south 0005390811 west with the west line of the school District tract a dstance said Denton independent in on rod found at of 4south line of thersaid 40-891 acre a tractt angle p p } the ne of THENCE north 89°19'00" west with the souta~t of the way said 40.891 acre tract and along a fence p i a distance of 434.65 feet to the place Of beginning and I enclosing 4.132 acres of lands k riculturaI "A" Distriot Classi- c changed from Ag is hereby ordinance fication Use toe ulanned nder, thevComprehensi~e Zoni Classi- fication and Us Texas with the following condi of the City of Denton, i tions and specifications shall be developed in accordance With the 1. The property incorporated concept plan attached as Exhibit A, ordinance by reference. A detailed plan shall be this submitted and approved in accordance with the the ` ordinances prior to development of any portion district, except for those areas.designated for two family and single family land uses. J (with exception of the 2. The floodway/open space area drainage channel) , landscaped cul-ThesGity not entries shall be privately maintained. must review and approve an executed agreement cutlin respctl$abilities before f ing specific a Teeisaued, building permits l be singl 3, Duplexes fronting upon Windsor Drive shale story. I 4, Areas designated for single family use shall conform to SF-7 zoning ordinance standards. 5. The area designated for multi-family use shall conform to MV-1 zoning ordinance standards. PAGE 3 n.. 3 SECTION I That the zoning district classification and Tuse wo designation of Lots 6A and 6B, Block 1, Cooper Landingr De ton Coto th unty, Trepla exast an addition the City Of Denton, , plat Records accordin recorded Cabinet F, Pag zonin4j amil is changed d fom splanned development to singl and use designation under the comprehensiV6 ~ district cla zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. cFrTToN IIi. That the city's official zoning map is amendela district classification. to show the change in zoning S o I That any person violating any provision of this QT-1 - ordinance shall, upon con rovi ion of this dorda sum inance ~ is violated $2,000. Each day that a p shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. { SECTIOfT F. That this ordinance shall become effective four- 1 ssa teen r eb directed to cause othet capti ng of athish o din nce rtoabe das from the date is her y published twice in the Denton .RTexas,Cwithinltent(10)f ~ Yslofethe paper of the city of Denton, date of its passage. 1991. i PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY i BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY r BYt PAGE A EXHIBIT A Nacuuf I r r ow i SINGL9 FAMILY i w ~ellef , . jo& , AI ~ ~ PDr'fz 1!, ~trL00DWAY/OPENSPACt if AtlJl1f QAHDEN HO tltNOie-rAlxr ArtAdMf) • II 141ryY ' M4lN MULTI-PAMILY OulLl 4•PLaX ,I' ' t , ' tool AlloO 1 ! ~ r r Ilk AOC i oE~a6 ~kOIt 't I/wMl~r R w r 4rrM,tirlwl nrr4rlrl Irlrlrrr/rr Iwrrr .rrwl 1 a t, fx- ..M P E DATE: 07/16/91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING DETAILED PLAN FOR APPROXIMATELY 2.117 ACRES OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 5 TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL PARKING AND A STORAGE BUILDING FOR THE DEBERRY FUNERAL DIRECTORS. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-0 at its r June 26, 1991 meeting. i SUMMARY: There is no change to the existing PD other than the ptoposed parking and storage building. BACKGROUND: d t The current Detailed Plan was approved in 39894 r PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: { ;t None FISCAL IMPACT: i N/A i t. Respev lly sub i edi Prepa s , Llo d . Harrell E ~r City Manager G{ Owen Yoa A Urban Planner Approved V Prank . obb nsj 1CP Executive Direoto Planning and Development i s 2732x/2 l i r s PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT f Council To: Mayor and Members of the City Meeting Date: July 16, 1991 Case No,: Z-91-006 GENERAL INFORMATION i Sill DeSerrY Applicant: 2025 W. University ; Denton, TX 76205 Same, dba DeHerrY Funeral Directors ; Current Owner: 2025 W. University Dentonr TX 76201 detailed plan of Planned Minor amendment to detailed a separate Requested Action: Development No. y/ pr k storage building and additional parking. 2 117 acres fronting on the sou 94s5d~feet Location and Size: University Drive (Highway 38t}) r f west of Eetor Road. Y. Land Use and Zoning: Surrounding Drive) commercial Zoning i Right-of-way of University North - lree Sina'.e family zoning and use across the s Street; y South - Right-of-way of Emery and use across the street. ndvacant property. c East General retail zoning West - Planned Development (PD5? zoning and commercial use. ivity center) Study Act Moderate Denton Development Plan: Area #24 1 SPECIAL INFORMATION j Transportation: the situ is a collector Emery Street, to the south of residential neighborhood. an existing there ie to be no street serving to the provisions °f P~he'applicant has planted According the site. when grown, access onto Emery from shrubs along Emery which, a ro~•~ of screening will provide a screen, limited by the Access to University Drive, is strictly R Neither the parking spaces Subdivision ft an. storage room inorethe additional 1 and none are 51200 g additional curb outs, w1.11 not warrant any 44 proposed. ,tan 1 F:YVi)tt )YL'i 1 1 (Case Z-91-006) page Two I SPECIAL INpORMATION (cont.) Utilities: No change is caused by this amendment. k Drainage: No change is caused by this amendment. j HISTORY The original this tract was established 19891969'Pnat plan meets pD zoning on Detailed plan was approved in October,accordin'd to, Article 11 etailed i the req o£ r the Code Eofordinances. plan } (o)(6)r k ANALYSIS planned and parking is The 2.117 acre site jr, on~eed seast toragea building existing developments and the propo off-.street parking is more than behind the existing building. is sace for i The paved portion behind the funeralgnexvic~, ; This Adequate % arki,lg the expected influx of visitors during by on-sire p overflow parking area will be attendants when used, and additional osed amendment, a storage building beyond What paT rheki prngop spaces will create no additional intensity , is presently allocated. i RECOMMENDATION I The staff recommends approval of this minor amendment to planned development #S. i' ALTERNATIVES i 11 Approve the amendment 2. Approve the amendment with conditions 3, Table or postpone consideration q, Deny the amendment j i 1 (Case Z-91-008) Page Three ATTACHMENTS , 1, Location Map 2. Approved detailed plan ! 3. Amended detailed plan j 4. ordinance Amending PD 5 III j t J 's i r t R 3463k z L y j.. Z-91-008 Amendment to PD-5 NORTH ~ Al3BURNJ L„ l H GG ARO ; `-~j UU ' / BELHAVEN PRINCETON CT. i w i GREENBRAIR W ° 3 / Y a TUL ANE TULANE i. K s \ ~ z c~ z w. ~ i Q? ow ~o z a ~~,C} AMHERST~ J , PSYCHIATRIC OR. E ~ Hd5p1TAl qR- fM6RY~ NE11TtlN RAY2UR ELEMENTARY lj~ O - WE5TCHEST£R C O d CORD ELL R[IELL w ON w CRESC i L RES,;,NT Lki - CR~SE.hT F(; TON Z 04 ' m 4 z LINUEN m L11 rn El SRI _ f w [LA C7 OW CROw ~ G7 E4AN `tom} F-ui W SENAA DATE., 6/13/94 SCALE NONE 1. i t !u:rsew NORTH Original Detailed Plan .00 EAUMC)HT ~L~VEY A-61 MA C.•CA)6LE 1OL 2405 °TZkCT TWn' i=-MINT A" ~,117h+CRES ' r ~ ' f ~ />~fGbTA'{e5 Cria'tE ~e•RYe f as 4els+ ~s.o + ~,~e hr,o i J4r ie. ,b* /~p~ Kn S IF 41-V, M%M4 i -(WlOm Pt 10 "1.. 1 7f,6 .1 ~."'TrlT I "'7Y.0~ I Z-91-008 PD - 5 Amendment NURTH . DD S ~ k 1 Tp7A1.PARK!~lG!90 SPAC fSI 570PAGC6 ~kAVeY A~; pf)L2M,5 y 4a !PARA'TIOP FEA C CA F RGOb56 hA 74A .P~ pEh+17 ~+.T~` Woo -3 TTqq' NO, ol AN. Z ; ' 4LAWS E own. 3 ,y i, 3 . or) ~f t ~ q 1 it t • w ! ITC -rTA 1. S IMP ` I if »t 1 ~ Y ti• r . I Won 1 M i i 71 p&Z Minutes June 269 1991 t~ A F T r Page 4 222555 B, Holt a public hearing and consider a recommendation concerning the preliminary and final re plats of the Cooper Landing Addi tion, Section lI, Lots 6A and 6B, Block 1, into Lot 6R. Staff Report: Mr. Yost stated that this is the replat for the zoning case dust considered by the The Development Review Committee Is Commission. royal. recommending app petitioner: Bud Hauptmann of Metroplex Engineering } stated that he was available to answer questions. No one was present to speak in favor or in opposition to the replat. Vice-chairman Holt closed the public hearing. , Mr. Fngelbrecht moved to recommend approval of the l replat of the preliminary and final replats of the Cooper Landing Addition, Section 11, Lots 6A and MB, Block 1 into tot bR. Motion was seconded by Kamman and unanimously carried {5-01• ide 1II. Hold a public hearing and consr a recommendation for a pla 1 minor amendment to the detaeiledne mn ofwouldortion oa ant allow I Planned Development S. storage building g and additional parking on 2.117 acres 1 I for the De Berry Funeral Home. e received to roperty owners thin Nineteen notices werreemailed 200' of the site, th in opposition, and two did not indicate a position. was Yost reporteds that planned devThereeis annexisting Mr. established o development and no added arf starageturoomistonbe sbuiit The petitioner is asking for The applicant has agreed to plus additional parking. by site remove the driveway shown on the north side of the site ' it will be removed before the hearing plan. Council. Jr. stated that they are Sill OeBerry, The second phase petitioner: planning to add parking and storage. and hearsest The wedge allow a garage for the rty lliine will eventually be hedgerow on the South prope shown on six feet tall. They wanted the driveway site plan to ellowdoaccess to htoheaccess fore y intNnean e purpposes. Th no plan willing to take the drive off of the site plan but would prefer to keep it. i r `I 4 fSti&✓rf~~ r {SSRgY Pun Minutes D R AF June 26, 1991 Page 5 They were considering a concrete or gravel drive for their lawn equipment. They want to maintain the lawn because it is near residences. Mr. Kamman asked how long the drive would be. Mr. DeBerry said that it would be 90 feet long, There would be no public access. j Mr. Engelbrecht asked if it would stop some distance from i' the curb. j Mr. DeBerry replied that it would stop on the north side of the hedgerow. The hedgerow is 5' from the curb. f Mr. Engelbrecht asked if a gravel driveway could be put in without being shown on the site plan, Mr, Robbins said that the problem with the driveway is what it would be used for. Staff is concerned about how it might be used. It looks like it could be used for access to the street. They should be able to drive their tractor without having a driveway. ; ! j Mr. DeBerry said that they cannot use the tractor to mow j the area between the hedgerow and the curb, Mr. Engelbrecht asked if he would be willing to put curb i stops at the end of the driveway. Having a drive encourages people to jump the curb.` Kids will cut through there at night. Access on Emery is a concern of the neighbors. When the funeral home was built they did ; not want any access on Emery. ; Mr, DeBerry said that he would be willing to put in a curb stop as long as it would not be visible to the public. Mr. Engelbrecht stated that the City is looking at water run-off treatment in the future. The more permeable land, the less run-off there will be. It seems a permeable surface would serve the maintenance purposes as well as concrete and it would help the City. Mr. DeBerry said that they aro bringing in dirt to fill some of the low places on the property. There Is a drainage easement on the west side of the property. i Mr. Engelbrecht stated that concrete cannot absorb water. He has trouble approving concrete surfaces that will only be used once a week. Mr. DeBerry said that if they expand more in the back they will need a driveway. Facecs.r VI..T P&Z Minutes June D R U 26, 1991 T Page 6 Mr. Engelbrecht said that such an expansion would require ad the drive coul be paved nneeded under thosedcircumstancest that a PD amendment be time. Mr. DeBerry said the might like to do the two concrete strips in the old-timey fashion. Mr, Appleton asked what material will be used for the storage building. Mr. DeBerry saide toad trlmi on thewexisting ist uclture. the same color as tr In Favor: Russell Trapp stated that he assisted Mr. Mr. DeBerry bought the 1aHe DeBerry with his building. from and built a nice facility, r o Emery E university t They have heir services. if he needed them. would use se their used half of the land. The half towards Emery is not were to ley knew developed. The neighbors theirohousesSe They neighbors ; University when they the funeral home looks better need to be pprotected but than Rite-We d. Mr. DeBerry ain't doing anything wrong: He has the best looking funeral home in town. He has said Mr. Trapp The given the city an electrical easement. the that he eCsnnit toe bring anythin wrong with ine driveway. needs city lights The City ought to allow a curb cut onHemWent ' i There is nothing wrong withoteniaS. cuThoseEfroze and they what the to DeBerry, Texas to buy p had to go back and get some more. city requires. They can't do it ielsee. They will have to be innovative andfThey dolthey will ape pdgrabfence. landscaped do The De9errys were required to do a 6' He asks that the City give Let him build his storage, Now they need storage room. needs tat Sill DeBerry an equal chance. is the his drive, and have a curb-fair. The facility curb-cut. It would only best looking thing on University. Recommendation: Mr- Yost s tstorageafbuilding recommends approval of the 5200 parking but not of the driveway. Mr. Kamman asked if the photenias were required. Yost said that a six foot hedge was required. Mfi . Photenias were a good choice. Mr. Holt said that the main fencen wfor to tprotecin t a requiring the sidents curb cut and he ceive a th curb-cut as will the re nei hbobe rh In od. If the driveway is perowed arms because they will p would be possible. People leaving the funeral home suppn into the drive and short-cut; therefore, tempted to drive* he cannot 'Irk. i WI:7 D D R P, Pun Minutes ; June 26, 1991 D i T Page 7 Mr. Appleton said that he thinks the driveway would be used by cruisers. People will drive through at night, run over the plants, and Jump the curb. A curb cut is not appropriate. He would have to see a plan for the drive showing the material and bumpers. He moved to recommend approval of the detailed plan amendment with the storage, garage, and parking facilities. ' Mr. Glasscock said that it seems there is adequate access to the back of the lot anyway. He seconded the motion. i Motion carried unanimously (5-0). IV. Update on Loma Del Rey drainage tree removal i k Mr. Salmon reported that on February 13, 1991, the Commission gave permission for the removal of 19 ma Del protected trees in In conjunction thewith Cit~rthwasL to plant R19 drainage project. new trees. The project has been redesigned and only nine f will need to be removed. Staff is asking that the number of trees required to be replace be UCe 5900,000ingThe The estimated project cost was $860,000 bids came in at over a million dollars. The project was redesigned to get back down in the $860,000 range. The easement will now be much smaller. Mr. Appleton asked why the project was not designed that way initially. Mr. Salmon said that projects are always designed to work with property owners. For this project, they had an uncooperative owner and the property was in litigation. E They will probably have to condemn the property and pay a large price. This project will not be as unsightly as an open channel. Mr. Engelbrecht moved to reduce the number of trees to be be replaced to nine, Motion was seconded by Mr. Appleton and unanimously carried (5-0). l V. Director's Report Mr. Robbins reviewed the list of upcoming cases with the Commission. He said that the NiederauerIf case iseda rezoning from Commercial to Agriculture. the existing mobile home sales lot would become non-conforming. The old fraternity house on Scripture' is the site of a request for a Specific Use permit to allow a private school. The replat of Eagle Point will be coming up to let 8raums go in ahead of Albertsons. There are still some financial problems with the case. Meeting adjourned at 6.18 p.m. 2146e R W3aivt S N)lYf~r95~j] lY 4 { e:wp&cq\69143 - ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY DETAOLED PLAN/FOR THE+ PLANNEDIDEVELOPMENT ROVAL OF AlJ AMENDED DISTRICT ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. 89'140" D-51 FOR OAPP VIOLATIONS A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2, THEREOF) AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. b ordinance No. 69-147, the City Council approved a 11 1, WHEREAS, y ' University Drive detailed bplan etweenr Bo2.1116 nnie Brae acres of and ; planned development south district land located described thereinf and Ector Roads, as more particularly lied for approval of a revised WHEREAS, the owner has app and parking; j detailed plan to provide for added storage buildings 4 and WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning commission recommended approval of the amended detailed plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSs ~FCmrON L. That Exhibit 8 of Ordinance No. 85-141 is amended ordinanc1e by reference. for the District, by the adoption of a revised "Detailed attached to and incorparatad SECTIONt That a copy of this ordinance shall be attached to ordinance No. 89-147 showing the amendment made. That any person violating any provision of this a ~ upon conviction, be fined a Sum not exceeding ordinance e shall, l, that a provision of this ordinance is violated $2,000.00on.stitutRache a day separate and distinct shall c offense. USINtLIV. That this ordinance shall spa e cffect ity iverfour- teen days from the date of its p tiongeof this ordinance to be is here:: y directed to cause the cap the official news- published twice in the Denton Toxas -Cwithinlten (10) days of the paper ' paper of the City of Denton, r date of its passage. 1991. day of ~ PASSED AND APPROVED this the BOB CASTLEBRR . MAYO f 444 M,... t n ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: k DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY l ! BY. 3 r a c a F s i s t E I { i i i i Page 2 i t 9XKTN , (t i i CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO; Mayor and Members of the City Council ; FROM; Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager i SUBJECT: Approval of a tax refund to United Title Co, RECOMMENDATION: i The Tax Department has mailed an Overpayment Letter and an Application for Refund to the taxpayer. All completed forms and necessary documenta- tion have been returned, requesting this refund, which the Tax Technician recommends. SUMMARY: Chapter 31,11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of ,500,00. United Title Co, has requested a refund in the amount of $ 691.92 because they made a duplicate payment on Account # 32231. y BACKGROUND:, Payments were made on 12--26-90 and 12-27-90, both in the amount of $ 691.92. United Title Co, is requesting a refund of their overpayment. 3 PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Y The Tax Department and the tax account of Don J, Hayes 3 L FISCAL IMPACT; { $ 691,92 PE ULLY SU TTED: L are City Manager Prepared by: ; Name Vic Schneider Title Tax Technician r Approved: t ame ar e Person' Title T e 2633C/3 f Y r f i ean,,,,~rtylraaoad APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND RduusAppllOMMs a1.lrprall T P fv f. Coliecdng Office Namet Coilectiny Tax for. ax g nu 12/ S` r n~ s art 7,20 Address City, StaM, 'ip Cods -----------------•.._..,.r_r^-r..rr----- In order to apply for a tax refund, the following information must be provided by the taxpayer. IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OW W . , y _ Name; Address; Telephone Number (if additional formation Is needed); IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTYr Z Description of Property. Address or Location of Property. Number 01 Pro 3 or Tax Receipt Account Number Proper* S INFORMATION ON PAYMENT Of TAXES: ng Unit Year for Amount of Name of Taxi From WhJc0 Refund Which Refund Date Tax of the Payment Taxes Amount PA of Tax Refund M RequesW ~ Is Requested Is Requested Taxpayer's reason for refund (sitseb supporting documentation). i if e.r r e T "I hereby apply forth* refund of the abov ribed taxes and certify that the Information I have given on this form la M and correct" ~7 /V9 r r 7 C b of Application for Tax Refund Signature S-3 / 44 e- V.S r rr.+ rAem / V/ I~rL. it LrC~~1r . .r.~. .r rrr rr rr rrr rr Approval Olsspproval DETERMINATION FOR TAX RlfUNO: Data Signature of Authorized Officer - Oats Slgnsfurt of Preslding Ofttoer(s) of Taxir Unit(s) Mr refund applications over fOSnedtheleMe~rNWPe^~ 1, In~taeemanl Any parson vrhs "so s taker e040rlr upert tM bnyoir 9 reoad+b+Il M subEsol aer ondlor mere + ne rat M awoad 12,000 sv then belh$9a+eh ilea and hnpeNau4hwnn+wIm+t a• w nol more Mart 10 ~Yom~ "M low than 2 In l~ ~ a term up byes" M Imprla M"t; 2. Cdn } troth In Section 17.10, POW coda. nErura: e~.+~ f f i 4 l; h LCrti~Y'.!i1} ~d r " t(}gpa}1 1 f , III F • t }~V 5230 ; i i 1f"rA 5 1, i-: f FNtn STAfE MLo 1~1 S. f }q,`'R~p.YfTLE COMPAN~t "T':'7'j<4~pw 7pu~s7ao~LCemb2x ' y'4 ;U.}~f.t f., ~ tr'Jkjj,s~T ~~t~•1 ~L1 ~ ~'~~lf tll• ~ r r t tl Tf fw 1'' 7r 1 I ''CYS'7'r'IV rl..i~ jlVr r ^ t Tif' } ' v~~ 1 r 7 ; y.a i, ~ v r i'v 1 ~r Q} f~ t 1 v r , v {r itt yr ' r ;•°e'`; t l;~t ~ t ~ ~}i R "7? ,~r i r ri'.. t F,j,!~Yt-t f f }T'~ ~ •J♦' r° '.l ~SStS T Ct7 •s~Y ~ ? t < ti , T~'t A i IS~Ai~SI l~. if I)f ~Yi1K 1: r [ f l~rr3~ y s:~' <~++?t~t ~;r~~.~D ~v~tj~kth ~'~~Q 4T+~~4,rd~Q MT{~ o"t'T'i+~t~ t f v ~ t r ;+~t m ~4t ~ , ~r ~ li` ark ;r~ •.~•~~1 r ~y, T it rr °r}~''lt .FiF L 1 f 1 ~ -4 t r ~i,~ 1 f v ~ ~ t it f, .E.. ~.5 t r ~'7ra a~ ~ ~31~• ~ 1 i`a•r ~ ~.K 'r 7N ~ u4 a"'"ny rf '~1 t ,r¢I > ~W - 1T fv j.._r r+ },f d ''IV J4 r ♦..i7 1.' L °tsr f f' i• rt5 1 . ~ ^ f r1v'li~r'~'''~~Tf L y•, f'• w L 'rvi 1 f I { I I{ - - { s y Bl'.~~$Yt I x' , „ra 4 f, '~"~jrK~ ;;Fily. " i'iC!} , •'RKF Ty 4 t aw 1 e~, ~ J .r~~' } 1~.+~~,YC 9 ;.~J ' v v-• -r 4- 1 l 1~ r ~.A.. L~~~~ .w ~4;.dt. 1S AiI 3 ~ 1' illy •I I ' I I"I f 1; ~1(~ ' I;, I 1, ',1 ~~„l P!l i;;~ 'J ' I• I ' ~ ' R f.. , del !;'I ~1.+ ~ ~~.I I; ;I I; ,I I;'I l;,;l i Ira I• I 1 t. L,i 1 I ,.1, I..i r,`I ;°'I '.:I ;1 + ~''1 ~!l''}r,'1:1;'l '4 • } I. o i$ nom..; e+~..,.~ ,rte- 1 c i f i } PPIA 0 1; MITI 1 4 1 PAGE I - D AT 18141 V C R P A Y N E N T S STATUS OF PAYMENT REPORT Fl dN45pW 06/27/91 NAME ADORES$ AMOUNT i ACCOUNT NO. RECEIPT ND. - - BUNNIE BRAE ST 1.147.25 OVERPAY ~ _ - E MCKINNEY ST 42.09 OVERPAY { 345146p9d0~ 90/OJll2^029JMARTIN. N O E OAK ST 96.07. OY£RPAY 24749000000 90/03/13-0761 TEAGUEr EDITH A ,_j,la.ObL1A_.OVERPAY. 29756000000 90/03)17^Oil73 BLACK, JOHN L E..HICKORY ST.............. . 434.72 OVERPAY _ 3 9,0300pp.Q0 pp./0 ~J1118 0^0419 DENTON.•__. C.I.TY...OF...E HICKORY ST '-34340bO0DS 9103/-0421---"DENTUN• CITY OF 4.56 OVERPAY 'I 21968000000 90/03/21:0169 DARNETTr WILLIAM K M WINDSOR Si 61.49 OVERPAY &A 11, 10530200000 90/03/27.0022 STE.K. DANIEL O SKY' RK R i 20 R _ O .4 _ _ M . - ON J T SUNNYOALE LN 130.84 OVERPAY III- 3126100 00 4 90/03/27 0753 RoSE• RONALD E .FRY _-323_.57 hRBAY.__ - 315[ DENVIEW CIA 221.03 OVERPAY 3489400 0006 03)27,1010_-.49EAT kkHOME L_OAANNK M7G• CORE} GARGARDF.NVIEW CIR NOME LO 221.03 OVERPAY 1111 FEDERAL 5 0 3/27-1 164 ! 000000000 90/03/27-1166 FEDERAL HORS LOAN MTG CORP CLOVER LN 648.07 OVERPAY a150 TA.JAN-.TRAIL_TR_.__.,. _ _ 95.OB_.OVERPAV..._. 22411000000 90/03/31-0434 WATT. NuWh !99.15 DVEPPAY J, OAK FORREST CI 1 30±170,0.00006 9 /04/02- 0?0....FI.V66.Yr. I.-'.-' L3Q5a660000 0/04/02^1433 FIRST STATE HANK OT DENTUN D6N[9CN 5T 9.00 OVERPAY 00 OVE i~ 31652000000 90/04/03-0456 WRIGHTr EDWIN F. JR LVERS PKVY ,3Da.4d,pYFRP,AY. 10484160000 90/04/07 0019 TRIPP. BOB F, RAMEY._C1R ._E_ - MEY t 19 215.55 OVERPAY 20284000000 90/04/07 0??4 DOLL1F t TOQO RA .R RAMEY AR 268.90 OVERPAY -._.2015500 a-0-90j1 04707- 2'S -JUL1:1FF• ODD D 20279000000 90/04/07^9266 SCHNEIDER# DON A RAMEY CIA 286.82 OVERPAY 0 20283000 00 90/04/07-025-t SCHNEIOERr DON A -225..48_OVF_RP~SY 266,69 OVERPAY 2 0464 000 0 0 0,90/04/07-p 218_ SCNN,l10Ekr DON A,_ DALOWIN ST 20929%00000 90/01 J07-2 GUNNEGTItUt NATL DANK BALDWI N ST 275.35 OVERPAY 20933 0 0D 90/04/07^O26u SCHNEIDER$ DON A 115.24 OVERPAY __...s-rER``RA .•00.1)YERPAV 99909000000 90/04/07-0312 GULDEN GATE MGMT $T 29 26204000004 90/04/06-4018 TER RAY CO SIERRA DR 20.00 OVVERPA --°"2090E000000'90l04J05-8737 TIMMONS: STEPHEN W AUTUMN OAK OR 342+61 OVERPAY 316900%0000 90/04/08-6120 CREED• ADAM BOB-O-LINK LN 208615 OVERPAY ' 3 323 000 90/04/08-0131 MURPHY# RAY _ M1S7YWOgD 4N_-_ 22.4.23_OYERP~SY 30804000000 90/04/08-0250 SPRINGER, JOHN J_ EMERSON LN 590IBOVERPAY 30824000000"90/04/09=0281-- DAY@'OCNNIi G TOMLLL ST 3004•.OO OVERPAY 227720040000 90/04 /08-04 10 MCKINNL•Yr WALTER R NORTHRIDGE ST DO CVERPAY 24610000000 90/04/08-0490 OEH2ENS• ARTHUR CHARLES _.TSMUARGREEH C.I _____----30D~Q0_OVERPAY__ 25546000000 90/04/08-0668_ HROWNSTED• LINDA L - W PRAARIE 9T 362.12 OVERPAY 1AI DR 2677 2 00 0 0 0 0"90/047080601 -FEDERAL HOME UJAN ATG .CORP SOVRAOG£ T 20.00 OVERPAY 27499000000 90)04/08-0619 KEASLLR• RAYMOND L SAVANNAH TR 29.81 OVERPAY 27975000004 90/04/08-0653 DORTNEM• LORN S G ADAA4UP .P1,.. _____.._.__•.30_aVERPAY. 20342000000 90/04/08-0690. WOLSKI•.EOWARD F_ S N 4ASR1sL OP 3.00 OVERPAY 28595000000'90/i'•7AD-0716T)ARR05i.J H JA DEL OR 20000 'OVERPAY 90/114/08 DEL DR 36 47 OVERPAY 1 2901100000000 -07 36 KLEM MERr ROBERT J PAY_.__._ 19a_41 QvOVE~7k2 PAY 29773000000 90/04/06-hOZ2 TIMS• JOSEPH L JR PAISLEY $ 3T1 0 93 0 0 90/44/08-1016 FIRST STATE BANK OF__DENTON.,_,- F'ULTON ST 63: ) 0 -03. 9 5 OVERPAY 32664000 324640000080/04%OA^I017"FIRST --STATE BANKDFDENTON BOLjVER ST 332740%000 90/04/OFl-1035 FIRST STATE BANK OF DENTON OLVER S7 A8 X19 OVERPAY 1 - 1 ' COvv ......3.26.,69- OVE:RPAY..__ 33274 0000 9l'/04/OB-103'7 FIRST STATE BANK OF DENTUN •90 OVERPAY } 31195000000 90/04/09-0076 HILL• JACK C KAYCOOCO OR 31372000000 90/14/10-0027 DAVIS: DEBT £ . a i i t`SYth't50 4dp~pij t R(yV7niid 2651L-1/3689 17T, i NO, AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT E FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; t, PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ; i WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated 1 competitive bids for the purchase of. necessary materials, equip- ment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and i WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted f herein; NOW, `THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the numbered items in the following numbered bids or m= aerials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid Proposals" on file in the Office of the City's 'Purchasing Agent filed according to the bid number assigned thereto, are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids for such items: BID ITEM AMOUNT NtMBER NO. VENDOR 1261 MASTER-PAR SYSTEMS INC $290281.00 i i f 5 _ errt4khx ,yyfgr „ p;suLarS~ 1 i i_ ce and approval of the above r SECTION cepts the oti~o II, That by the acceptance City acs such item and agrees numbers terns of the submitted bids, or services in the bids tor of the persons submitting supplies quantities purchase the materials, equip fl in the, dards s Invitations, Bid ec i flea Cion Stan accordance witciSied and tsums) contained s for the sPe Proposals, and related documents. ons submitting the City and pers. bids wish to SECTION III. That should i P a❑ accepted items And suas i,atted Manager . Of' the the bids, the I a rove reauit City of the formal and written awarding of authorized Co execute , enter into ti acceptance, Ppproval, is hereb vided that tative or his designs r ctewhich shall beaCtached 'hereto; Pro ccndjtions~ the written coat specified sums containen 2 the dzitten contract is in ua tities e ands spe a terms, roved and specifications, standards , q in the Bid Pxoposal and related bid documents herein app accepted. roval of the above s ' k the acceptance and the a PP Council hexeby SECTION IV. That by i e t~ma of the submitted bids ty a written numbar a.f funds Cho e i pursuant a to amount and in e ex nditure ' 1 ved bids authorizes Ko in. zed f accordance with the the contract made pursuant thereto as authori a become efieotive That this ordinance shall SECTION V- its passage and approval, imme ate y upon , 1991. j day o f PASSED AND APPROVE'D this F 3 s BOB CASTLEBERRyt 'MAYOR i a ATTEST ; s i l s 3 I APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FQ~tzTY ATTORNEY DEBRA ADAMI DftAYOVITCH, I i BY: I s PAGE TWO ; f s DATE: July 16, 1991 i C I T~_C Ol~t1C ~4_fl$PQfl~ TOi Mayor and Members of the City council 10 FRGMs Lloyd V. Harrell, City. Manager SUBJECTS BID 111261 PRE-CRUSHER AND CONTAINER BFiS,QhlLFif1I~AS~413s We recommend this Mbid be aster-Pak Systems Inc lowest bidder meeting speoifioation, in the amount of $29,281.00- I t This bid is for the purchase and installation of I ~1MMA~L I one pre-crusher refuse compactor and a 42 cubic yard container. The unit is designed to give a higher compaction k re-orushing refuse rate by doing as the name indicates, p prior to the nompactio,j process. This particular unit is ; intendedinstalhlid hfeweretrips Pto the;llandfillr ~s more refuse to be (See memorandum from ! This unit will be rented to Peterbiltf Charlie Watkins dated July 11, 1991.) The lower prioe quoted by IDS ($38.00) fails to meet aotion force and hydraulic pump t requirements for total comp capacity. Our speoifioation requires 96,200 lb of farce 1 they quoted 90,000 lb we palled for a pump capable of 52 GPM the quoted a pump capacity of 30 GPM. j 1 9 flBQKg24l2ND3 Tabulation sheet and memorandums. from Charlie ~ Watkins dated July 8 and 110 1991. I EBQgB~~1.~.~_pLP68TME~J.T_QB__4flQl~E~_9~EF4TEI2j ..Commercial Solid j Waste Dvpartment 3 E1a9@b__IMEA91t This equipment will be purchased from Certificate of Obligation funds previously auri%ed by Council for acquisition of equipment and vehiolesf Acoountd 720-004-0020-8707, Respectfully submittedt s: Lloyd Harrell V City Manager t ' i Appvovedt i Names DenlseWHc1 Titlef Senior Buyer DH/dd 169,DOC y as'rk't.+e~ t i } { 13ID 0 1261 1 I { 1 I I 1 I i 8ID WE p1iECtit15F 1 AND CONTAINER I SP IWUSTRIES IDLTDVISITM in ML SRPUI I11U1Pmrr cc j co Icy t ~ rNC I SYS» im I 1 ~ CFEN DATE JUNE 200 1991 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 t { I ; I ACCM # I 1 1 I I ; f_ 1 T, QTY I ilw nESCRI mat vmR ; vmm 1 vam I vEt~OR I vE!>" t vEtWR 1 1 I 1 _Ivl 1 ; 1 1 : 1 l 1! 2 1 YRECR1l511E:R PMSE I $32,o36.00 1 X3,753.00 1 $30,900.00 1 $33,509.00 1 $280017.78 1 $241631.00 1 Ccr>Pac"roR I I j I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I 2 I 2 142 CY OG''AGCNAI. I $4,475.001 $4,5115.00 1 $60773.00 I $6►000.00 $3,512.00 1 $40100.001 1 COMAINER 1 I I I t 1 f 1 t 1 1 1 ~ 3 I 2 1 MAII.ATICN ON ( $1,050.00 I $850.00 1 $1,250.00 1 $4,200.00 I $975.00 f $550.00 1 1 1 , ! aI15iom JCB SIZE 1 1 I 1 1 I j 1 1 I I Irla.ur~ { ' f 1 1 1 I ~ I 4 I f CONrA7NER c;Ors $95.00 1 ` I I 1 1 i I 1 ! i ~ I I 1 I 5 ! I 510nvA' I 55 HAYS I 45.0 nays I 6-9 Wmcs I 30 wars I 70 DAYS l 60 DAYS I i 1 I 1 I TGTAL COST $37,561.00 i $290243.00 1 $370923.00 1 $44,759.00 1 $34,390.78 1 $29,281.00 1 1 I 1 1 { i i I 1 ( 1 1 ` 1 , f_ ~''+ifittfiM~kli'L~V6>4kANd3;'ru'z~~eYtsl;~V,S#&~4xuiJ~~°reckv+'+.er+avMds:a're;.ll.ww.wYiarr.Y.v.,.khi;tidPd~y~•dlti+eiH.tta(A.d.~;tikStAr.,t*aS^aA1€1T4~i'SdWl~k}1Yt1~A•i[~tiiYd~G~Mr FIRM , i tA. t ,,;.tea I f i I city a DLNTOAF, TRUS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E, McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76241 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Torn Shaw, Purchasing Agent FROM: Charles Watkins, Superintendent, Solid Waste Division 4 DATE: July 8, 1991 SUBJECT: BID NO. 1261 PRE-CRUSHER AND CONTAINER FOR PBTERBILT x The Solid Waste Division recommends awarding the bid to the low bidder meeting all specifications. In this case, the low bidder meeting all specifications is Master Pak. The apparent low bid received from Custom Metals was withdrawn due to an error in the bid. The second lowest bidder was IDS but the unit does not meet specifications for hydraulic equipment. Additionally, contain- er guides are listed as optional equipment on the IDS unit for an extra' $95, but the guides are a part of the unit offered by Master Pak, ¢ a 1 / n / fI s r es Watkins 1 CSW/sc 1W2/070891148 xc: R, B. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities Bill Angelo, Director of Community Services Vince Gallegos, Supervisor, Ccimvercial Solid Waste ; 3 ; F c r j f f 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 17 1 1 1 I CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent FROM; Charles Watkins, Superintendent, Solid Waste Division y, DATE: July 11, 1991 SUBJECT: PETERBILT PRE-CRUSHER " The pre-crusher will belong to the City and will be rented to Peterbilt in the same way as all of our roll-off equipment, The proposed renta, price is $345.00 per month which is based upon the expected life of the unit, which in this case is 10 years, the cost of the unit including financing, and the anticipated maintenance cost over the life of the unit. i J~ es" a 5 CSW/sc 1W2/071191149 xe: R. B. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities ; Bill Angelo, Director of Community Services k 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 4342529 R GU~1L-J/ }Uciy NQ. a AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMFROVEhtEPdTS; PROVIDING FOR' THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has received and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works or improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and plans and specifications therefore; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: 3 SECTION I. That the following competitive bids for the f construction of public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invitations", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City's Purchasing Agent filed according to the bid number assigned hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids: BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR AMOUNT ? 1211 BETZ IND. MMIBIT A ~ i SECTION 11. That thn acceptance and approval of the above competitive bid s shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the bid for construction of such public works or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such person shell comply with all requirements specified in the Notice t i i N T-- 0 i I, the acceptance and approval of the above SECTION II. '£hat by the City accepts the otfe i tems of the submitted bids, numbered r o f the persons submitting the bids toso uclieste or a services in purchase the materials, egsipmenications, standards quantities rdance with the terms, P acco and, for the specified sums contained in the Bid invitations Bid Proposals, and related documents. SECTION III. That should the City and parsons submitting a a of the bids to nda8=ement s $smite a result of wish the approve an accepted item written f outer into a forma Manager 4 acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bauthorizedito execute or his designated representative is hereby provided that the written contract which shall be a, -ions~ hereto; the written contract is specifications, standards, in quanCities andtspecifiedmsumsocontainad in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein approved and i accepted. SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the above # I numbere tems of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds thrsior in the too ant wri ten accordance with the approved bids or pursuant contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become etfagtive imme ate y upon its passage and approval. ' > 1991. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of r. BOB CASTLEBERRYr'MAYOR i ATTEST: J FER , GR TARY APPROM) AS TO LEGAL FORM*. a DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY ~ r a BY: PAGE TWO eY f I I DATE: July 16, 1991 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM; Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager i i SUBJECTt BID #1211 WATER CONSULTINO SERVICE AND CHEMICAL SUPPLY BECOMMEN AD TlOlit We recommend this bid be awarded to Betz ; Chemical for the water treatment and chemical supply eor a five year period. Each year the contract is to continue would be based on approval of budget funds during the budget process. Estimated Cost are listed in attached memorandum. 1 ; This service and related chemicals are to treat the sewage effluent water utilized in the boiler and oooling. towers at the Municipal Power Plant. An extensive evaluation has been performed under the direction of Jim Thune, Electtlic Production Manager and the result are 1 communicated in the attached memorandum. g~"jj. 1112t Tabulation sheet, Memorandum dated June 24, i 1991. PR00$~j~F~P9ETT OR QaQS1P_AFFEC~p; Electric Production u Division t Budget fl.tnds for Plant Maintenance for the ; specific year affected 1991-1995. 3 a Respectfully submitted; { Lloyd V~Harrell City Manager t Approvedt Names Ton; D Shaw, C.P.M. # Titlet Purchasing Agent y TS/dd 170.DCC p j F i EXHIBIT A BID P 1211 SID NAME WATER CONSULTING SERVICE 1 BETZ I b CHEMICAL SUPPLY I IND I 1 OPEN DATE February 28, 1991 I I ITEM I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I I ,t A IPOILER SYSTEMS COSTt 100 I (1c) I Average dyalea of oonoentratical I. i (2f) 10)[7088 SCAVENGER; coat/pound I .97 I , t 1 (30 ISCALI INHIBITOR; coat/pound i N/A (4d) IOROANIC DISPERSANT; ooat/pound I 1,18 l I 1 (5e) IALEALINITY ADJ.1 ooat/pound 11.22,1.15, .745 1 I I A,. I I I n (6d) (NEUTRALIZING AMINE; oost/pound 1 2.02 I (7d) IPILMINO AMINE; cost/Pound I N/A fi I I I (6b) 'RESIN CARE; cost of program I ; (9b) IFUEL OIL CARE; cost of pro,raa I 1.58 - 6.32 I, I I 1 (10d) IATIZILIARY COOLING...; post/pound; 2.64 3 (COOLING SYSTEM COSTi I 6 1 t (10) (Average cycles of concentration I 1 ! (2d) ISCALE INHIBITOR; coat/pound 1 1.65 I i I I I (3d) ICOARI3I0N INHIBITOR; cost/pound 1 3.69 I ? I I I ~ (4d) IDISPERSANTI ooat/pa-ind I - - I 1 (5e) IPh CONTROL; cost/pound I I r 1 1 I (6e) t9IOCIDE A; oost/pound I (To) 19I0CIDE H; cost/pound i 2.70 (8b) ITOMIL LAY-UPI coat of program I 8.2 HP31 C ICONSULTINO SERVICES: I I 11. Annual coat I I I I I , j 12, Other Costa I I D IAMENDRD PRICING ADJUSTMENT; I I t 11, let Year Adjustment % I 6% 1 I I I I2. 2nd Year Adjustment % I 6% 1 I I { 13. 3rd Year Adjustment % E 6% I 1 I zl 9r!o rM q r q 1214 I I 1 I I I I 1 1 ` gID WE HA7EN Oai51d.' ,o a~E MCE I BETZ I N4i m I CAIDQi I BlK2SMN I 5 afimwL sTBPLY 1 RV ; aEmx L 1 1 LAB I am DATE Febr~ 26, 1991 I ' I I 1 3 _ I I I ~ I YP2 l 1 vzs~oll I VFt= VEMM rm 1 YPFi1I>c5CT4?= L A IB~R CMT I 100 1 90 I ASE 150 (io) I k mw cycles of wmotmtioal 1 ! 1 1 I (2t') IM M 9CAVMMi ooWM=d 1 .97 1 3.06 1 2.35 1 3.15 1 (30 IS= 71 10°°'t/M° N/A ! WA I N/A I 1.00 ! 3 ..y I E (4d) I== D M oo UXW 1 1.18 1 N/A I N/A I .56 I (5s) IMZU= Att.; OWUPasfd i1.22,1.15,.745 I IX O IUS. OT CMVW 1 .10 1 I I I I PROtayM I 1 1 I i 1 I 1; (6d) lwm= mm; oostlpmcd I 2.02 I 4.02 1 1.41 1 1.31 I I I I I 1.08 ■ I (7d) 1MM AM ooetha+ed N/A N/A I WA 1 I I 1 I { 1 t (00 IS= CM) coot of ;tlw 1.72 aS PXPC5[. 1 3.70 1 I 1.64 I 1 I ; ' 1 I I I I (9b) InM ML CAM oust of k4ow o 1 1.56 -6-32 1 6.80 M I 22W 1 4.00 4 I 3 I I I 15.15 PR 5000 OLI 1.66 ! 1 I I I (10d) IAUxILIAAY Oxt.TNO...i oaat/par4l 2.64 1 2.16 1 .77 1 .75 1 c 8 I000L11A SZM MM ( 6 1 4.5 I 5 I 5 I (to) (Avow oydit of 0WOM StUm I I tat) leyrur nafuti oost/pa~t+d 1 1.65 I N!A { 1.30 1 125 I I I (3d) I >i aat/p=ld 1 3.69 1 N/A 11 1 .75 1 I I 2.40 0 1 11 1 1.05 1 (4d) 1tti coot/POwd 1 I ( (5a) IPh COMMI oost/p Aid I I cm rcr 1 1 tt 1 { { I 1 1 (f») 1&IOOIDB A3 oost/Pumd om w 1 3.30 .43 1 I (7e) 1BICCIIE Si ooet!➢a+esi 1 2.70 1 5.32 1 N/A 1 4.00 1 I I (8b) ITO& LAY-421 ooat or ptco I 8.2 Ef91 I N/A 13EE PKFM L 1 1.13 Pit M PT 1 ! I I I I C CMOI= 3a 11. Am.1 Cwt I I _ I NO CrSf I 1 " ' I 12. Cthw Costa I 1 ND GLffi ! I 1 I - D *am mm= AWMW lat Y,1 f% ` i 6% 1 7.5f 1 A~ 1 O.Oj 1 ; 12, ad Year Ad)xb nt f ! 6% I 510% ( ax I 1 13. aid Year Adjsetooat % I 6% 1 5.0% I 8x 1 I I I I { i * +Ne" J it.,l~A:y III' ti 1 I T0: Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent FROM: Jim Thune, Manager of Electric Production DATE: June 24, i99i j : BID 81211 WATER CONSULTING SERVICES ANO_CHEMICAL -SUPPLY---------^-_- ! - - t ~ 5 AE ~ theMfollowinq evaluation and- µ Regarding the above referenced bid, I submit recommendations. 1 I INTROOUCTIQN: ` Betz, Buckman, Colgan and Nalco proposals have been received re sal wit the above referenced bid, Costs have been evaluated for each proposal wth detail provided for selected programs. Buckman offered low overall bid per Evaluation and testing of selected Buckman programs failed 1 specification. x service criteria and the proposal was rejected, in part, duo to performance, Betz offered the next low evaluated bid. Evaluation and testing of Betz+s t program resulted nto acceptble contract with Betz forswateorrtreatmenttchemaicalsandUrt f our. recommendation consulting services. O Tf Aa There are two broad arses of interest with regard to chemlcaL treatment. Oxygen. scavenger and cooling tower treatment costs. Those costs detailed: a Buckman ataon "I= 3 @s~,t Powerline Bulab 9606 Pre-TAch 3006 Nalco 1T00 Oxygen 1200 P Scavenger: 120 PPM Prod./ 2.48 PPM Prod./ iIS PPM rod./ 44PPMMoProd./ 1 PPM oxy. 1 PPM oxy, axy. 53.06/ xy. $0,91/lb $3,15/lb 52.36/lb. Application 0.682/mmlb. steam/mmlb st 35/mFl'1b steam/mmlb .i Cost: steam 1 ; Powerline CODs Bulab T034 Conductor 6130 N40lPo8303 l Cooling 21 PPM Res,/ 10 PPM res./ 100 PPM res./ in tower in tower in tower, in tower ; Tower: 4,2 PPM/in 2 PPM res./in 20 PPM res./ in 6 PPM res./ : + make-up pond make-up pond make-up pond in make-up pond 51.66/lb. Si.26/1b, 51,30/lb. 56.93/mmlb m,u. $2,60/mmlb m.u, } far . 5 f:il.rd:N Y V j Page 2 Bid 01211 I QZ Buckman Sca 14on Nalco Powerline 0002 Bulab 9327 1 PPM res./in 10 PPM res./ tower tower 0.2 PPM res/in 2 PPM res/in make-up pond make-up pond $3.69/lb $0.76/lb 40.74/mmlb m.u. $1.60/mmlb m.u. Bulab 8006 2 PPM res/in tower 0.4 PPM res/in make-up pond $1.50/lb 40.601mmlb m.u. Total: 47.67/mmlb m.u. $4.60/mmlb m.u. 426.00/mmib m.u. $12.00/mmlb m.u. Treatment asst on a "per unit" basis favors suppliers in the following order: Lowest per unit: Buckman ; Betz Nalco Highest per unit: Calgon EVALUATION: Buckman proposed a three component cooling tower treatment at a combined cost of approximately $4.60 per million pounds of make-up. We were unable to obtain any references from utilities currently utilizing this program with sewage effluent. Condenser operation is critical to overall Plant thermal efficiency. Risks associated with implementation of an unproven program are great and not warranted. The proposed oxygen scavenger was tested under laboratory conditions and found ineffective in reducing dissolved oxygen levels in condenser hot well condensate. Proposed dosage may be effective with high temperature feedwater however, oxygen scavenge and corrosion control in the condensers would not be achieved as the condenser is cycled to atmosphere. Boiler chemical treatment included use of chelant, causic and polymer, This approach deviates from current and typical treatment used and accepted by industry for the pressure and application found in our boilers. . The program also requires installation of additional high pressure chemical { food pumps to properly administer the treatment. SUMMARY: Buckman supplied chemical at low evaluated cost. Testing of the evaulated programs indicated ineffectiveness of oxygen scavenger, and the consultant demonstrated no experience treating cooling tawars utilizing sewage effluent for make-up. In addition, an investment of several thousand dollars for ; chemical pumps would be necessary to administer the boiler program. The Buckman proposal does not comprhensively address all issues of the specification and is therefore rejected on performance. 1 ?sLkAna; s e r G'[tN@yj'] i Page 3 jt{ Bid #1211 Betz: Betz proposed two component cooling tower treatment at a combined total cost of $7,67 per million pounds of make-up, References were reviewed and f indicated acceptable results treating sewage effluent with similar programs. Oxygen scavenger was tested under laboratory conditions and successfully reduced residual oxygen at specified dosages. The boiler treatment program is in line with accepted industry practices and may be easily administered with exsisting equipment. RECOMMENDATION; Betz offers low evaluated proposal (Buckman rejected) and has successfully demonstrated product capability and user references. I recommend contracting ! with Betz to supply water treatment chemical and services per Specification 91-0090004 for the period thru September 31, 1992 with option to extend the contract per II,8,4, for up to three years beyond Sept. 31, 1992. All pricing { firm per Bid #1211. Water treatment chemicals are costly and generally not inventoried in amounts suitable for annual consumption. Chemicals are typically ordered as needed, maintaining minimum inventory to accomondate system upset and/or acquisition delays. i "Blanket order" or "By Use Requisition" will be utilized at your discretion. The annual value of our useago is estimated as follows: 1 Remainder of 1991:$26t000.00 1991-1992: 60,000.00 d 1992-1993: 64,000.00 1993-1994: 68,000.00 1994-1996: 72,000.00 Please review this recommendation and advise of any further action required. . ~ A ~ i une, Electric Production Manager ' JT/ks 06031037/04 i t cc: Ernie Tullos, Director of Electric Utilities Bob Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities File: Bid 01211 XXVI Y i i { s i 2651L-5/36139 f ; NO. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDIN~l FOR THE EXPENDITURE ON FUNDS FOR PURCHASES OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WHICH ARE AVAILABLE FROM ONLY ONE SOURCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE: LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. j WHEREAS, Section 252,022 of the Local Government Code provides that procurement of items that are only available from one source, i including: items that are only available from one source because of patents, copyrights, secret processes or natural monopolies; ; 4 films, manuscripts or bookq; electricity, gas, water and other 4 utility. purchases; captive replacement parts or components for { equipment; and library materials for a public library that are t available only from the persons holding exclusive distribution rights to the materials; need not be submitted to competitive bids; and i i WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to procure one or more of the items mentioned in the above paragraph; NOW, THEREFORE, ' THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: # # SECTION I. That the following purchases of materials, equip- ment or supplas, as described in the "Purchase Orders" attached hereto, are hereby approved: I~ PURCHASE t ORDER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT i 13910 ESRI $14F550.00 I f SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above items s a not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the quotation for such items until such person shall comply with all requirements specified by the Purchasing q Department. SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any contracts relating to the items specified in Section I ; and the expenditure of funds pursuant to said contracts is hereby f authorized. r"~tms: z n SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective r imme ate y upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of X1991 i €E BOB CASTLnFARY r MAYOR i I ~ ATTEST; i i APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCN, CITY ATTORNEY I BY: i' i f r fDATE: July 16, 1991 ~~.TY_4ogNcTE~_B~EQ~T TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council ' FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Purchase Order 13910 to ESRI BT44MM1~iR0TT,Qgs We recommend this Purchase Order number '13910 in the amount of $14$50.00 to ESRI be approved, i f "bMggX: This purchase order is for the annual software maintenance contract for the O.T.S. system. This price includes routine maintenance as well as upgrades in the software. This expenditure is for proprietary software maintenance and available only from one source. Requisition of proprietary software is exempt from the bidding process by state law. H6S~Si$Q!lft~; Purchase order to ESRI, Redlands, California, i± Invoice #219978. p~~Qggb~, -kEP~flTh1E1IT___S~S__S~I34llES--_AM=I Information } Services, Community Development, Engineering and Utility. FISCAL IMPACT: 1991-92 Budget funds 1 1 t Account# 610-080-0250-6502 $ 4,000.00 Electric Utility SSS 620-082-0472-8502 4,000.00 Water Utility 100-044-0080-6341 J.,.j jQjQq Information Services i $14,550.00 Respe fullysubmitted _ _ - L1 yd V. Harrell y City Manager Ap,Qroveds s Name: Tom D. 3haw,-C.P.M. Titles Purchasing Agent 1 TS/dd 166.DOC { yr r.r.rrvra, rr~rv-t~+ PURCHASE ORDER NOt 13910 wrr 'fhls number must aPPear on THIS THIS {S A lmolces, delivery slips, cases, ctns., boxes, parktng slips and bills, CONFIRMING; ORDER Page No01 (IF MARKED) Dater 07 09 91 DO NOT DUPLICATE - Bid No: q No. , 7620! pURCHAS-ING 7738G OW S p N 190l' ) B 17/167 0047 FAX 81 %382 4697 DELIVERY INFORMATION SERVICES OR ESRI ADDRESS 324 B E. MCRINNEY i / 300 NEW YORK ST TX 76201. ESS 8014EUS, CA 92373 DENTON, RWLAN TERMS FOB DESTINATION DELIVERY QUOTED 07 31 97 4,000.00 ENDoR NO. • 4,000.00 4,000.00 ~ E SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE FOR THE PERIOD FROM 4000.00 1 6,550.00 ► 2/7~g1 THROUGH 2/6/92• 6,550.00 1 EA SAME AS ABOVE 1 4,000.00 ppCE TOTAL, 14,550.00 080 0250 . 8502 4,000.00 GRAND TOTALS X4,550.00 610 0472 8502 6,550.00 620' 082 8341 ,100 044 0080 4. Terms ng Not 3 lions. F.O.S. Deelln6m prePad l 7nkss aherv 1e epecHrdl _ 3. Terms -Net 30 iunkss other.Ase yfied.f purchasing Olvlslon --31 1bR lNS IONS: nd a nal invoice vrith duplOle copY' 6. No ledaral or stale sales lax shall be lncfvded , ~/FQIr1f~R - inprlaesMICA to - lwcounte payaMo 21ti E, tvkKlnneY St - ~nnlnn.TX 7(b01 ,.u .,.w..,,_ µv..asv+.r;,x+'++e"w`?flMes+nen..tiwuu{.n`..F.c.-...,... .w, 1 t5a~9 W= i 360 Redlands (714) 0,11fornia 7932853 New ESRI Enyhonmentei York 92373 Systems Street Research j Institute ; PROJECT MANAGER: LISA WARD PROJECT #t 4518 CLIENT #t 552 i 2199.7 13 UPDATED INVOICE ESRI i Rem It to: ; 380 NOW 10* Si- Invoice Number: Redlands, CA 92373 caw FEBRUARY 15, 1991 j Cilanl'DENTON CITY OF 324-B E MCKINNEY STREET ; f DENTON,'TX 76201 f CONTACT: MR. GARY COLLINS c l Atlm ACCOUNTS PAYABLE (817) 566-8562 Re; A14NUAL ESRI 'MAINTENANCE FEES FOR SOFTWARE INSTALLED 014 YOUR ( MULTI-USER IBM VM. S - CITY AGENCY TAX EXEMPT SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE FOR THE PERIOD FROM FEBRUARY 1, 1991 , THROUGH FEBRUARY 61 1992: , AMOUNT , , ITEM'DE5CRIPTION - _ s-16.000.00 j ARC/INFO J5OFTWARE MAINTENANCE (IBM VM) - - } - j 1$ 16,000 TOTAL...... -,00 11 k (1,450.00) 4 APPLY CREDIT MEMO 0 25(304... ( FOR USER COWEREI~CE PEES PAID ) 14,55p.40 ; PLEASE PAY as naaot_eaa . I 4 I N 1 f % it 1 5 LW/bc I f fiEMiTTANCE CC?Y i i CITY of DENTON, TEXAS 215 E, McK1NNEYI DENTON, TEXAS 762011 TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 M 3 M~ R A N D U M To'; Denies Harpool, Assistant Purchasing Agent ` r grog: Gary A. Collins, Director of Information Services Date: July 2, 1991 Subject: ESRI Software I' . E t The software we buy from ESRI is proprietary software and is not available from any other source. If you have any questions, please give me a call. I Gary A. Collins Director of information Services i f f r` DATE: 7/16/91 c;7Y COUNCI R~aORT FORM Mayor and Members of the City council TO: FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager sued: Approval of an ordinance authorizing an amendment to the ' City's contract with services Program for Aging Needs. amendent to the Approval of an oWith aDentontCountynFraiendssofmthe Family City's contract MM NDA7IQN: The Human Services Committee recommends approval. usc.Kf3ROUND: 90-91 fundings (spring 19) During the 19 Committeen9(HSC)rirecomme ded $2$700tin HSC was directed by Human Services funding for Parents Anonymous. f Council to maintain human services funding at prior year with Council's request and levels. in order to comply also ocate fundinglto threenagen iea,pThose sagencieesuand the reduced , HBO ➢ of each reduction is listed below: ttt SPAN $ 800100 t Friends of the Family $19300.00 t R3vp $ 600.00 were Since that time Parennts Anonymous whichh u their ceased to esovide the self-help programs a contracted. Parents Anonymous no longer exists as A viable social service agency. HSC recommends that the $2,700 allocated' to Parents Anonymous be reallocated to the agencies whose budgets were reduced in order to provide funding. Approval of the ordinances will increase i9g0-gi funding ~.Y. to Services Program for Aging Needs by 4800 (from $25,20 1 to $269000) to Denton County Friends of toediance ie $1 1300 oamen rom $31,700 racts3fo0r0VAN and Friends of the j necessecessa(ryft dcont over 3 n ! Family because original contract amounts were $10,000. The original contract fortheir was $aat00. ; 4 No ordinance is necessary to amend EEEE , j ~ ,f May r V E naaMS DEPART'' The community Development 0f fire of the Planning and Development Department will administer the budget and the contractual relationahiP with each agency. i { ctnnu 7MPAQ7: he No impact an the general .fund.. This is simply a reallocation of existing human services funding. RRespe fully-s fitted: yd V. 5 arrell ' City Manager Prepared by: Barbara ROSS Community Development Coordinator ApPr ved: } Frank Robbins AICP Executive Director for Planning a Development 4 1 1 j rn. t pwpdocslapanko ORDINANCE NO$ AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO AN ARREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND SERVICES PROGRAM FOR AGING NEEDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on November 6, 2990, the City of Denton (City) and services Program for Aging Needs (SPAN) entered into an agreement providing for the payment of funds by the City to SPAN for pro- viding the community services described thereinf and WHEREAS, the City has agreed to increase the funding for the contract term by $800 in exchange for SPAN providing a concurrent increase in services; NOW, THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS2 SECTION I. That the city council hereby approves the amendment to the agreement as attached hereto, between the City of Denton and Services Program for Aging Needs. SECTION IT. That this ordinance shall become effective itn_ mediately upon Its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1991, I j I BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTESTt JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY., APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM; DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY t ~~'1/~ tom- f a t } { y AMENDMENT OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND SERVICES PROGRAM FOR AGING NERDS (SPAN) Recitals on November 61 1990, the City of Denton (City) and Services Program for Aging Needs (SPAN) entered into an agreement, a copy of which is attached, providing for the payment of funds by the City to SPAN for providing the community services described therein. the City has agreed to increase the funding for the contract term by $800 in exchange for SPAN providing a concurrent increase in services. AGREEMENT The parties agree to the amendment of paragraph A and B of section IV (Method of Payment) of the attached contract, the amendment to read as followst IV. METHOD OF PAYMENT A. Payment by the City for service provided hereunder will be made in accordance with the following schedule, upon the request of the Agency for payment by letter ad- dressed to Community Deve'~opment Coordinator, City of Denton, 110 West'Oak, Suite B, Denton, Texas 76201s $2,100 on or after November it 1990 $2,100 on or after December 1, 1990 $2,100 or after January 1, 1991 $2,100 on or after February It 1991 $20100 on or after March 1, 1991 $2,100 on or after April 11 1991 $2,300 on or after May 1, 1991 $2,100 on or after June 1, 1991 $2,100 on or after July 1, 1991 $2,100 on or after August 1, 1991 $2,100 on or after September 1, 1991 $20900 on or after September 300 1991 B. In no case shall the total compensation paid hereunder exceed Twenty-Six Thousand Dollars ($26,000.00) for all the services rendered. Signed r 1991. 1I BOB CAS'TLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BYs i 1 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BYs SERVICES PROGRAM FOR AGING NEEDS (SPAN) DIRECTOR ATTEST: BYs SECRE Y { 1 j ~p~nk i{ k ii ni s4i f' I aagdm\f f ke i ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND DENTON COUNTY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILYf AND PRO- VIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on November 6, 1990, the City of Denton (City) and Denton County Friends of the Family entered into an agreement providing for the payment of funds by the City to Denton County Friends of the Family for providing the community services de- scribed therein; and WHEREAS, the City has agreed to increase the funding for the contract term by $1,300 in exchange for Denton County Friends of { the Family providing a concurrent increase in services; NOW, THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS$ SECTION I. That the City Council hereby approves the amendment j to the agreement as attached hereto, betWern the City of Denton and I{ Denton County Friends of the Family. SECTION IZ. That this ordinance shall become effective im- mediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1991. k BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ; ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY3 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORME DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BYs AMENDMENT OF AGREEMENT,BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND DENTON COUNTY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY Recitals On November 61 1990, the City of Denton (City) and Denton County Friends of the Fancily entered into an agreement, a copy of which is attached, providing for the payment of funds by the city to Denton County Friends of the Family for providing the community services r described therein. The City has agreed to increase the funding for f the contract term by $1,300 in exchange for Denton County Friends of the Family providing a concurrent increase in services. AGREEMENT The parties agree to the amendment of paragraph A and B of section IV (Method of Payment) of the attached contract, the amendment to read as follows: IV. METHOD OF PAYMENT A. Payment by the City for services provided hereunder will be made in accordance,with the following scheduls, upon the request of the agency for payment by letter addressed to Community Development Coordinator, City of )Denton, 110 West Oak, Suite B, Denton, Texas 76201: ( $7,925 on or after January 1, 1991 $70925 on or after April 1, 1991 $7,925 or after July 1, 1991 $9,225 on or after September 30, 1991 E B. in no case shall the total compensation paid hereunder i exceed Thirty-Three Thousand Dollars ($33,000.00) for all the services rendered. Signed 1991: t ; BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: J t n• t F Y i APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, OITY ATTORNEY 's BY t b'~w DENTON COUNTY FRIENDS OF 'I FAMILY DI R ATTESTt r11 BYt CRETARY { I i G 1 i s l a ffk 'I Vie..,. 4 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT i TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Handicapped parking near First State Bank ~Z RECOMMENDATION: Approval of ordinance to create 3 new spaces. None exist at this time. SUMMARY: This ordinance will create 2 new spaces for handicapped parking on Austin and 1 on walnut, BACKGROUND: Handicapped customers and employees using the First State Bank ; J building have difficulty getting into the building across traffic. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED; y Traffic, Division, motorists, customers and employees of First State Hank FISCAL IMPACT: $150 for signs excluding labor ; i ell 0773E i i i St r5% CTSSC MINUTES May 13, 1991 ITEM B6 REQUEST FOR HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE ON WALNUT STREETt iwuci,ukwu said the Staffneled Gtr the an ocat on which g hasac some Walnut Street# deficiencies. One of these is the chance of rollkaak of a slo on Walnut. wheelchair dueintotthroughetraffic, These Another prdrivers oblems sand major the door open`ng potential liability to the City. 1 street. There is Only t staff has looked at an alternative nn Austin street. Staff doesn't one conflict - the trolley Another minor problem in the believe this would be a major problem. area is the curb parking an the east side of Austin. It leaves enough space but is not wide enough for a handicapped parking Space. If this space is allowed on the west aide of Austin street, it would be at least 1 foot short the standard doeauirement, staff thinks it is a less dangerous place, proposed Walnut Thi apace not meet all standard dimensions but it is safer than the prop j location. ce. Clark said a ml to Walnut sred treet. sop when lIt'saevaluatedt it'sanot ; i He steered h i like the bank against the City. j 1 George Highfill, First State Bank representative came forward to would 1 address the commiesthe• baa%. salCust mers°T often task iforr handicapped be appreciated by parking. They could park across the street but would have to deal 1 ~ with traffic crossing the street. He personally thought Walnut street would be a little safer because the traffic flows slower on Walnut. walnut is so short from Austin ; j to Locust. A190, the banks ramp leading into the building is at the illon Walnut is they are going corner of Locust and Walnut. If they park e preferable, i to have to deal with going up Although, neither apace is ideP.l. Kay asked if on Austin street you have to go up the stairs to get up to the bank. That would be very difficult for anyone in a Highfill said they would have to go around the building wheelchair. to the southwest or northwest corner where there is a ramp, { Chadwick asked if there was anything on Hickory, Kay said the traffic is much faster there, The driver would be opening their door in the traffic. { Gore asked where the closest handicap parking was to the bank, Highfill said there wasn't any at the moment. ' Chadt~iick askec. about putting some in the elevated parking lot, Kay said you would have to deal with a ramp and crossing the street. ; There is no easy solution. i i j x i CTSSC MINUTES May 13, 1991 (Cont) stopped there, Kay said no. It stops Chadwick asked if the trolley one block south on the east side of the elevated lot. Guess asked if a ramp could be added at the entrance ac the bank on Austin Highfill said there wasn't enough physical sp assisted or in Chadwick asked if most of these people were coming wheelchairs. Kay said they are not coming in wheelchairs. Chadwick asked if there was enough width on Austin. Highfill said it would need to be widened. I ; it as indicated D in ed spaces have no time lim otson said handicapp staff's memorandum. aces. Highfill said he Smith asked if the bank had thought of two sp ' had no objection, tilized to a Chadwick asked if 2 foot ofotheeucurb Street be U ark said he hadtno EE! handicapped space adequate objection. 1 i STAFF gECOMMLNUEDS Approval handicapped parking spaces on i The l COMMISSIONERSt Smith made a motion for 2 Austin and 1 OnWaf nuaCeatoodscideotheutlocations,•, Kay i sank and City s motion passed unanimouslY• + seconded the motion, ! 0995E f i { { r i 1 e:wpd0cslord%d1&sb1pko ORDINANCE NO. I AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING SECTION 18- 109 OF CHAPTER 18 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO PROVIDE FOR I DESIGNATION OF PARF;:NG SPACES FOR EXCLUSIVE USE OF DISABLED PERSONS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY) DESIGNATING SAID PARKING SPACES ON AUSTIN STREET AND WALNUT STREET) PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF A FINE OF NOT LESS THAN FIFTY DOLLARS, NOR MORE THAN TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS) PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS2 SECTION I. That Section 18-109(a) of chapter 18 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby amended by adding paragraphs (18) and (19) to read as follows (18) Two (2) parallel parking spaces on the west side of Austin Street near the southwest corner of the intersection of Austin and Hickory Streets adjacent to the First State } Bank building. l (19) One (1) parallel parking space on the north side of Walnut Street near the handicapped access ramp at the northeast corner of the ; intersection of Walnut and Locust Street, adjacent to the First State Bank building. SECTION II. Any person adjudged guilty of parking a vehicle in violation of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and punished by a fine of not less than Fifty Dollars ($50.00) nor more than Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00)6 SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record Chironicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. r I t I S FIIt/JRSti } 1 I I day of - 1991. PASSED AND APPROVED this the BOB CASTLEBERRYr MAYOR 1 ATTESTi CITY SECRETARY JENNIFER WALTERS, I BY t. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL F'OR141 1 DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY S Y By: "s , I i i i i 4 1 t 1 i ,S 1 i fTY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76101 / 'TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 ` C MEMORANDUM DATE: Jelly go 1991 Lloyd Harrell, City Manager TO'. i Transportation FROM. Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering & i SUBJECT; First State Bank Handicapped Parking The area around First State Bank has no handicapped parking adjacent to the building. Several patrons of the bank ity. complained to bank officers who directed them tCoV The City a handicapped strong effort to imp all corners is making a we will be making access to the square. "street soape Project". handicapped accessible in the Commission was presented some basic concepts The Traffic Safety and they made the final determination showstheodetails r and location of the spaces. An attached map benefit First State and Bank these three spaces will the at building tenants, We feel employees, asking. p customers and possibly some adjacent businesses who need satellite Spaces will be rl a walnut space zone that the sinset currentintly The Austin parking, painted for no park the street lane, widths adequate when the sidewalk to keep vehicle doors open. The Traffic safety commission and staff recommend the ordinance be approved as submitted. { k Je r 0995E i I I 7 CITY COUNCIL REPORT 2ORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council I FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Truck Route Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: Approve the ordinance as submitted i SUMMARY; I. This truck route ordinance is much more definitive than the existing Division 2 of the Motor Vehicles and Traffic (18) ` section. BACKGROUND: j Truck issues have been controversial several times for ] different reasons. Usually, it is because of the noise they create or the damage to the streets. The actual routes provided in 1966 also needed to be changed to reflect current situations and capabilities. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AKFECTED: Trucking companies, Citizens of Denton, Police Department, Engineering and Transportation Department I FISCAL IMPACT: i The intent is to save thousands of dollars in street repairs by placing trucks on proper routes, Several routes were also added in commercial areas to help trucks operate cost t efficiently around town. i 0773E i f 4 CTSSC MEMO l:ebri!ary 27, 1991 page 2 ITEM #4 GENERAL BUSINESS: a. Truck Route ordinance Staff has invited major businesses and other truck related businesses in Denton to this meeting. Their comments will ! be addressed by the commission. Staff envisions that the truck route ordinance will be voted on at the April 1, g ; 1991 meeting if no major disagreements develop. i 0995E r 1 j I , j i 1 Y. ! r ! ...E i k E : , ,i i - A'WTin'"~~ kkll F FAY•-?+541 i f MEMORANDUM _ E ~ ! HATE; May 3, 1991 TO: Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission FROM: Paul Iwuchukwul CTSSC Liaison 3. SUBJECTS May 6, 1991 meeting d n ITEM 11 APPROVAL ON MARCH 9, 1991 MINUTESr ITEM $2 TRUCK ROUTE ORDINANCE; on the March 4, 1991 meetingr major area businesses and truck operators were presented with the proposed truck routes, Their questions and concerns wore addressed by the commission And there was no opposition to the proposed truck routes. However, a question arose as to the status of Woodrow Lane from McKinney to Shady Oaks since the truck route map was not showing it as a truck route. Staff has investigated this discrepancy and the omission was simply a drafting error. Woodrow Lane is a truck route from h~MccKinnnnen Street to Colorado Boulevard. The truck route map corrected to reflect this. Staff recommends approval of all truck routes as shown in the enclosed truck route neap. 0995E 1 j 4 r t 7 i to MINUTES Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission May 13, 1991 PRESENT; Alice Gore, George Kay, Mike Amador, Dawn Baldwin, Marilyn smith, Carl Guess, and Doug Chadwick, Chairman ABSENTi Jonathan Cott and John Erwin STAFF: Paul Iwuchukwu, CTSSC Liaison Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering & Transportation Jane Biles, Main Street Coordinator ITEM 11 APPROVAL OF MARCH 4, 1991 MINUTES: George Kay made a motion to accept the minutes as written. Carl Guess seconded the motion, Motion passed unanimously to accept the I minutes as written. ITEM a2 TRUCK ROUTE ORDINANCE: j IWUChUkWu presented the request. He said Woodrow Lane was deleted ' by mistake. It has been added and all business owners affected have been notified. I Chadwick asked if clarification had been received regarding service roads on the interstate. Iwuchukwu said yes, All service roads are designated as truck routes, STAFF RECOMMENDED: ApproVal COMMISSIONERS: Gore made a motion to approve the new Truck Route Ordinates map. Amador seconded the motion, Motion passed unanimously. 0995E I 1 l ..man; l CTSSC MEMO June 26, 1991 page 2 ITEM t4 TRUCK ROUTE ORDINANCE: The City Attorney has rewritten a few words and ordinances books ordinance due to the recodifieation of the city j please review. If acceptabler this ordinance will be scheduled for the next City Council meeting. { 1. - - - r i CTSSC MINUTES July it 1991 i page 2 ITEM #4 TRUCK ROUTE OR9TNANCEt ~ clack presented the request. Be said staff has been working on this r and feels this draft addresses all issues4 i ordinance for a yea Trucks"bonds Claa8 4 missioners asked if concrete a companies i of had Clack f Concrete Put Com . now required in sec. 15-55. said this was new and could be enforced with an ordinance. f Clark said it could be I Chadwick a ked if $5,000 was enough, reased if requested by the commission. Chadwick suggested inc ncea0 but said q could be increased if necessary. $15,oO it d the discussed sea, Is-56. Maximum vehicle load limit ancommission was in agreement with epeeifioations. t Approval STAPP RECOMMENDATIONt i Guess made a motion to accept staff COMMTSSTUNERSf Moktlriendpassed Baldwin seconded the motion. 111 unanimously. 0995E S s 4 i j 3 { i 3 j T' T T, T f i t F A } A4 j CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL 8WLDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8100 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 9, 1991 TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager 1 FROM: Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering & Transportation SUBJECT: Truck Route Ordinance This proposed ordinance revision has been studied for. over a , year. Comparisons of neighboring cities were completed to add components that have proven functional track records. The ordinances from Mesquite and Garland were used the most as they are considered the best in the Metroplex. Truck routes are a very sensitive community issue. For safety reasons, trucks need to be kept off of streets that have potential conflicts like children, slow moving vehicles, ;t vegetation creating view obstructions, etc, Truck routes also try to place heavily loaded vehicles on streets that have properly designed pavements. To prevent damages from occurring regularly, these streets are usually newer, thicker, designed for higher speeds, and turning movements. The ordinance revision has more definitions, a better description of when a delivery route is allowed, an updated x truck route designation list, and specifics that address concrete trucks. Section 1856 is very specific on maximum vehicle load limits. The Police Department had a great deal of input in these areas and provided significant, practical recommendations for new or revised routes, Officer Blalock deserves a great deal of credit for his assistance and, l knowledge in this area. The enforcement vehicle necessary for the proper operation of 1 this program should be obtained as soon as possible. This would include scales ($2,500) and heavy springs to allow ; transport of the equipment. The scales will be funded by the 4 Street Patching Division and the Police Department will fund the springs. Finally, we invited all the local trucking companies and I interests to a Traffic Safety Meeting in March. Each company i received a copy of the ordinance and seemed satisfied that the ( ordinance was reasonable. Jer C a 099 5 T. ~ r zav' erwfodocs\tkrt,o j ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTIONS 18-51, 18-52, 18-53, 18-541 18-55, AND 18-56 OF CHAPTER le OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON RELATING TO REGULATION OF TRUCKS AND TRUCK ROUTES; AMENDING DIVISION 2. (TRUCKS AND TRUCK ROUTES) OF CHAPTER 18 OF TH$ CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON) ESTABLISHING DErINITIONSJ ESTAB- LISHING DESIGNATED TRUCK ROUTES AND REGULATING FOR DEPARTURE THERE FROM; PROVIDING FOR EXCEPTIONS; PROHIBITING CERTAIN USE OF RESIDEN- TIAL STREETS; ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE OPERATION OF CON- CRETE TRUCKS; ESTABLISHING A MAXIMUM VEHICLE LOAD LIMIT; PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR VIOLATION THEREOPi PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. I THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS; CTION.3. That Sections 18-51, 18-52, 18-53, 18-54, 18-55; and 18-56 of. Chapter 18 of the Code of Ordinances relating to i regulation of trucks and truck routes is hereby repealed. SECTION 11. That Division 2 of Chapter 18 of this Code of Ordinances is hereby amended and shall read as followss DIVISION 2. TRUCKS AND TRUOK ROUTES Sea. 16-5i. Definitions. The following words and phrases, when used in this article, shall, for the purpose of this article, have the following meanings commercial vehicle shall mean any motor vehicle 4 designed or used for the transportation of property, i not including a passenger bus, passenger automobile, panel delivery truck or pickup truck. i Garage shall mean a place of enclosed shelter or repair facility for vehicles. Gross vehicle weight shall mean the total weight of a vehicle including any load being carried by' the vehicle. 1 N Motor vehicle shall mean every vehicle as herein defined which is self-propelled. Pole trailer shall mean every vehicle without mo- tive power designed to be drawn by another vehicle and attached to the towing vehicle by means of a l reach, or pole, or by being boomed, or otherwise secured to the towing vehicle, and ordinarily used for transporting long or irregularly shaped loads such as poles, pipes or structural members capa- ble, generally, of sustaining themselves as beams between the supporting connections. Residential street shall mean a street whose pre- dominate purpose is to provide access to abutting single family or two family residential proper- ties. Semitrailer shall mean every vehicle of the trail- er type so designed or used in conjunction with a motor vehicle that some part of its own weight and that of its own load rests upon or is carried by another motor vehicle. Trailer shall mean every vehicle without motive power designed or used for carrying' property or passengers wholly on its own structure and to be drawn by a motor vehicle. Truck terminal shall mean an and of a carrier's k line containing a truck yard, dock and lighterage facilities, management offices, or storage sheds for vehicles or cargo. Truck-tractor shall mean every vehicle designed or used primarily for drawing other vehicles and not so constructed as to carry a load other than a part of the weight of the vehicle and load so drawn. Vehicle shall mean every mechanical device in, upon or which any person or property is or may be transported or drawn upon a public highway, in- cluding motor vehicles, truck-tractors and semi- trailers, severally, as herein defined, but ax- cepting devices moved by human power or used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks. Sees 14-52. Truck routeat use required exaeptions, it shall be unlawful to operate or cause to be operated upon any public street within the corporate limits of the city any PAQt 2 S F i ' commercial motor, vehicle, truck-tractor, trailer, semitrailer, pole trailer or any combination thereof except on such street or streets as are designated as truck routes. The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply: u (1) To a vehicle traveling to or from a truck terminal, garage, place of repair, place of performing a service or a place of loading or unloading, over the shortest practicable route to a point on a trunk route, Any such vehicle shall be permitted to proceed from one paint not on a trunk route to another such point without returning to a truck route if to return would unreasonably increase the distance to be traveled between such points. The operator of any such vehicle shall have in his possession for inspection of police i officers, his log book, delivery slips, or other evidence of his destination and point of origin to ; justify the presence of the vehicle on a street other than a designated truck route and shall present said evidence on demand of any police officer for this exception to apply. (2) To an emergency vehicle operating in response to f 544 any emergency call. I (3) To a vehicle operated by a public utility while of cruising in an assigned area for the purpose p facilities. inspecting the providing maintenance i service to o such~ or providing service (a) To a city-owned vehicle eet to for pu ter service, i.e. , garbage pick-up, street repair sea. 18-33. Truck routes designated. The following portiojis of streets, to be used in accordance with the provisions of this artiols, are hereby established as truck routes Airport Road (P.M. 1515) from interstate 35W to the Municipal Airport. y Bell Avenue from Mingo Road to the intersection of Eagle Drive rind Dallas Drive. j Carroll Boulevard from Sherman Drive to Fort Worth Drive. Colorado Boulevard from Spencer [toad to Loop 288• Counts south city limits line from U,S, 377 (Fort Worth Drive) Club Road (P.M. 183 to th PAGE 3 i M`1Vinxt-g fiS3'F1P I p. 1. 4 I~ 1 Drive Prom the intersEaotion of Eagle Drive and Bell Dallas . Interstate 35E to Avenue Eagle Drive from Interstate 35E to the intersection of Bel Avenue and Dallas Drive. limits line. P.M. 1173 from Interstate 35 to the w from city Drive to the 7 Fort Worth Drive (U.S. Highway 377) south city limits line. limits line to Interstate Interstate 35 from the north city 35E and 35W Junction. Interstate 35E from interstate 35E and 35W Junction to the south city limits line. Interstate 35W from Interstate 35E and 35W Junction to the k south city 11mits line. from Teaslay Lane to Interstate 35E. Lillian Miller parkway Eagle Drive. j Locust Street (P.M. 2164) from Sherman Drive to , t from the north city limits line to Locust Street (P.M. 2164) t Highway 77 (Elm Street). Loop 288 from Interstate 35E to Interstate 35. limits McKinney street from Carroll Boulevard to the east city ; line. Drive) to Barcelona 380 (Uni',ieraity Mesa Drive from Highway Street. Mingo Road from Ruddell Street to Boll Avenue. Morse street from Loop 268 to Mayhill Road. 2164) to Bell Avenue. '~o Xvaue►t Street (P.M. Drive) to Mingo Road. Prairie street irO Ruddell street from U.s 380 (University 35E to Colorado Souls- San Jacinto Boulevard from Interstate vard. Drive to Woodrow Lane Shady Oaks Drive from Willow Springs Carroll Boule- Drive from the north city limits live to vard. 288 to Mayhill Road. Spencer. Road from Loop PAc3E 4 Teasley Lane from Dallas Drive to the south City limits line. from Interstate 35E toFort Worth Drive. U U.S, 77 the east city limits line to U.S. 380 (University Drive) from the west city limits line. Dallas Drive to Shady Oaks Drive. Willow springs from from McKinney Street to Spencer Road. ' Woodrow Lane rohibited. Sec. IS-34• certain use of residential streets p No person shall operate a diesel-powered tractor or truck- tractor combination on any residential street between the hours of 10e00 p.m. and 7t0o a.m. Soo. 18-53. operation of concrete Trucks. (a) The owner of any vehicle used to transport ready-mik 1 concrete shall file with the City Engineer a surety bond in the amount of $5,000, and conditi the a st of repairing all such vehicle will'paY to the he City y eratibri of any such damages to streets by reason of the op 4 vehicle with a tali m- lba,~oad in excess of thirty-six thousand pounds (3 r OOO (b) It shall be unlawful to operate a vehicle transpoorti ready-mix the concrete chute which traps cconcrete. attached to ng sec. 10-560 xasiatut vehicle load limit# erate, cause to be operated, or (a) peit to b shall be unlawful to any public street within the the C ight be operated on a ha limitations: following a motor vehicle oonegor moo recof the vehicles in excess of any weight, with load, of (1) In no event shall the total gross exceed eighty any vehicle or combination oion of vehicles, thousand pounds thousand (2) No axle shall carry a load in excess of twenty pounds (20,000 lbs.). An axle load shall be defined is the total load transmitted to the road by arallls whose centers may be included between two (2) p transverse vertical planes forty inches (400) apart, extending across the full width of the nehi the highway up shall not exceed (3) The total gross weight concentrated surface from any tanderoa-axle group thirty-lour thousand pounds (34,000 ibs.) for each such PAGE 5 {ELI V. t tandem-axle group. "Tandem i(4o~')ior morewapart (1) c0mm0n or more axles spaced forty iatnches least one f. ram t point coftweightcsu pension..ng shall not apply to: (b) The provisions of Section 18-56(a) or causing to be operated a motor (1) Any person opstating permit for the operation of vehicle for which a valid t commodities Overweight equipment used for tranupc dismantled hag been issued which cannot be rea pegartment under the provisions of by the State Highway TEX. REV. CIV. STAT. ANN. art. 6701a (Vernon 1977), as amended; Any person operating an emergency vehicle in response `r (2) to any emergency calls one erating a vehicle for the purp* 4 (g) Any person cP any public utility in tha constructing or maintaining City of Dentoni or vehicle while per- k Any Person operating a city-owned pick-up, street garbage (4) A servicer ie. ~ forming public repair, and water service. (a) Vehicles used eXCluoively to transport ready-mix concrete shall be operated in accordance with the weiSeat• 2 Provisions fi (Vernon , art 670ld-120 later by 19 TEX. REV. CIV• STAT. ANN as amended. No vehicles raga ii 1977, Supg. 1991), this paragraph shall carry a tandem-axle load which exceeds thirty-six thousand p ounds (36,000 lbs.), a single axle lbs. which exceeds twelve thousand poi unds ht thousand pounds load forty g L and a gross load which exceed~, (48,000 lbs.)• (d) Vehicles used exclusively to transport milk may be operated if the distanas between the front whi~lat of the least twe tya tandem-axle, measured longitudinally, roug eight feet (28'), and the maximum load carried on any ounds of axles does not exceed sixty-eight thousand p (680000 lbs.)• (e) Vehicles used exclusively to transport solid waste (except hazardous waste), as defined in the Solid WV rno ispos)l Act, TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. 5361.0Cit May be operated gross la d no stafaxaesd forty- the public Denton with a tandem-axle pounds (44,000 ibs.), a single axle gross four thousand thousand pounds (20,000 lbs.) and to exceed twenty exceed sixty-four to not not t load vehicle no the e a gross hood for the v hi thousand pounds (64,000 lbs.) provided that when th PAGE 6 1 j vehicle is to be operated with a tandem axle load in excess of thirty-four thousand pounds (24,000 lbs.), the owner shall have first filed with the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation a surety bond as required by TEX. REV. CIV. STAT. ANN. art. 670ld-10a (Vernon 1477), (1') Any peace officer having reason to believe that the gross weight or axle load of a loaded motor vehicle is unlawful, as provided herein, is authorized to weigh the same by I means of portable or stationary scales, or cause the same to be weighed by any public weigher, and to require that such vehicle be driven to the nearest available scales for the purpose of weighing, in the event the maximum gross weight or axle load of such vehicle is found to exceed by more than five percent (5%), the maximum weight authorized by law, such peace officer may issue a citation, unless the oparator possesses a valid overweight permit issued by the Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation or the Commissioners Court of the County of Denton, Texas. sec, 19-57, Penalty provision for violations. ~ f Any person, partnership, limited partnership, association, or corporation who fails to comply with the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon first conviction shall be fined a sum of not less than Twenty-five Dollars ($25) nor more than Two Hundred Dollars ($200), and on a second or subsequent conviction a sum of not less than Fifty Dollars ($50) nor more than Two Hundred Dollars ($200)6 y Boo, Is-59, Marking of truck routes. The City Engineer may cause to be posted appropriate signs and markings giving notice of designated truck routes. SECTION II. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or applicatiothereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION iil, That this ordinance shall become effective four- teen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) day of the date of its passage. PAGE 7 ~~1b IIX?h4RtW PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR i ATTESTt JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: i : i ~ i E i PAGE 8 )MAI j, CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT i , I TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Billy Ryan High school Zone I i ' t RECOMMENDATION: Approval of school zone as submitted for 1,000' section centered on main entrance to McKinney Streit SUMMARY: The new high school will open August 26• For safety reason8t a i school zone is proposed to be installed prior to that opening. { y t BACKGRO MD' school zones are installed patterns a faccompility opened " Normally, and accurate studies of traffic , using a traffic projection and excelltent state State co Texasiont the t proposed school zone was approved by PROGRA____ MSS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: DISD, 3tUdentBr parents, and motorists on McKinney ! { ~ i FISCAL IMPACT; j A traffic signal is being installed with DISD and the City tothe City i Traffic pivision sharing the cehesCity. Total cost pavement j markings will be completed by j including labor is $30,000. 4 ~ I i a t 0773E i f P RUS- 35 KP,~1WH_EN SO - - _ - i fS Ci P FOR r - SPEED-_ ONE H 2,331 Ii 4154 J~ t~J m ' ( J BILLY CHOOL ENTRANCE 130 ro0 140400 rsOtoO 7 - } 160FtOO \i 17 *00 ~ PaoPOSeo 54 TRAFFIC Z . SIGNAL Y M-K9j:L WWI ZONE 36 ~.OB2 3 ° 30y061 Q - D'30.• IBO OPEN iWO NEW RADAR STATIONS AS REQUESTED 2-24-B8 f 33~ Y 41.1 f t CITY OfOENTONr TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDJNG / AEN70N, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE(817) 566.8200 j MEMORANDUM S July 9, 1991 DATE; Lloyd Harrell, city manager TO: FROM: Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering & Transportation ' SUBJECT: Billy Ryan High School zone ) Billy Ryan High School will be opening on August 26, 1991 with the 10th, 11th, and 12th grades. We have been working with # DISD to provide the safest environment possible for the opening. 3 ~ ' The entrance to the High School at McKinney SCC 3et will be , signalized prior. to school starting. we received State approval of the signal warrants on July 21991. rucEionwis b e F set this week using a span wire type constinc McKinney is scheduled to be widened in a 5 to 10 year period. we also received approval for a 1,000 foot school zone centered on the main entrance to the high school 55 mphinnT~e Sschool The speed limit in this area is currently g the morning and zone will reduce that to 35 mph during afternoon periods, The campus is to be closed so no noon hour period is necessary. The State Department of Highways has shown an excellent cooperative spirit in approving this zone ; speedt zone stwere udies of ter bmitted. The since is actual to field facilitytais ain procedure place. i Estimates of speeds in this area now are at or above the 55 mph speed limit. Using the 85th percentile for existing trafficlas i! per the state manual and reducing by f that speed would have probably only put us in the 45 to 48 mph area. The 35 mph limit approved by the State therefore seems ~ reasonable and acceptable. The signal and the school thisnearea recommended so that future ispeedinzone will reduce speeds studies for McKinney street can arrive at more acceptable ; limits. The Traffic Safety Commission wasNbrie©eervatiothis were ? at their July 1, 1991 meeting date, expressed by the commission. They did feel that McKinney s should be reevaluated for speed zoning in its entirety in the near future. , 71 s 1 Lloyd Harrell Billy Ryan High school 1 page 2 1 The school zone as proposed in the ordinance is an excellent starting point for the new high school. The State has shown excellent cooperation in approving the signal warrants and school zone in only three weeks. The district office did some y effective lobbying in Austin for us since our situation did not i meet the text book requirements for school zones, 'traffic f Safety and staff recommend the ordinance be approved as r submitted. 3 J r Cla ' 0995E f f i s f 4 i 1 y FC 97WpdOCS\98930 r I i ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING ANT) ESTABLISHING A SCHOOL SAFETY SPEED ZONE ON STATE HIGHWAY FM 426 (MCKINNEY STREET) FOR BOTH DIRECTIONS OF TRAVEL BETWEEN STATION 160 + 40 AND STATION 170 + 40 MEASURING A TOTAL DISTANCE OF ONE THOUSAND (11000) FEET IN LENGTH AND BEING CENTERED A DISTANCE OF FIVE HUNDRED (500), FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE TO BILLY RYAN HIGH SCHOOLt' REDUCING THE MAXIMUM PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT FOR SUCH PORTION OF SAID STREET FROM FIFTY-FIVE (55) MILES TO THIRTY-FIVE (35) MILES PER HOUR DURING CERTAIN HOURS: PROVIDING A PENALTY OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00): PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE) PROVIDING FOR PUBLICA- TION; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. Based upon an engineering and traffic investigation { heretofore made as authorized by the provisions of section 189, j. Article 6701d, V.T.C.S., the prima facie speed limit of thirty-five (35) miles per hour for vehicles is hereby determined and declared to be prima facie reasonable and safe, and such speed limit is hereby fixed for vehicles traveling upon the following named street ' and highway, or part thereof during the hereinafter designated j hours. The location of said school zone and the hours during which said speed zone shall be in effect are as follows to-wits Location Extent Hours in EP eo Y f State Highway Both directions of travel 7:30 a.m.-8:30 a.m. FM 426 between Station 160 + 40, 2:30 p.m.-3:30 p.m, (McKinney Street) and Station 170 + 40 measuring a total distance y of one thousand (11000) feet in length and being centered a distance of five hundred (500) feet on each side of the main entrance to Billy Ryan High School. SECTION It. An individual adjudged guilty of exceeding this speed limit, when signs are erected giving notice thereof, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and punished by a fine not to exceed Two Hundred Dollars ($200,00). SECTION 111, That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sen- tence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the valid- ity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City f !i _i Texas, hereby declares it would have Of Denton, such invalidity. council of the City portions despite any enacted such remaf. ping IV, and the City Secretary SAC - That this ordinance shall l,become effective four- teen (14) days from the date-of its pa { directed to cause the caption Of this 0zfjo ce to , Texas, within ten (10) days of the is hereby enton Record-Chronicle, the official news- published twice in the Of Denton 'a paper of the a sage. date of its p day of , 1991r s PASSED AND APPROVED this the f 1 BOB CASTLEBERRY MMAYOR t ATTESTS CITY SECRETARY JENNIFER WALTERS, e I BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL CFO, ORM ATTORNEY DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, j i page 2 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Mombevs Of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager f ' SUBJECT: Consider approval of a contract with state 1 Department of Highways & Public Transportation RECOMMENDATION: Approval E } SUMMARY.: I The City maintains all signals within the City of Denton. The, State has recently (3 years) begun to work with cities to allow standardization. This keeps City personnel maintenance skills and parts required at cost effective levels, } BACK, GR~ OUND: Similar contracts have been passed for 380 at 135 and Teasley at 135 E, This State program is very positive allows us to be involved in the construction which aids our learning curve for fpture operation of the equipment, } PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: } i Traffic Control Signalization Program, Engineering and ` Transportation Department, SDH & PT, and motorists using intersection, FISCAL L IMPACT: State reimburses all costs including labor. y 0773E r 11D CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 ! TELEPHONE (811) 566 8200 i; MEMORANDUM i i i ~I I DATE: June 24, 1991 , TO, Rick Svehla, Deputy city Manager FROM., Jerry Clark, Director of Engineoring & Transportation SUBJECT: Avenue D Signal Agreement j i f The State Department of Highways and Public Transportation (SDHPT) has scheduled construction traffic signals for the 1 35treet, As intersection of Avenue D at 135E and US377 at Acme per two recent contracts for 135/380 and Teaaley/ E SDHPT is allowing the City to furnish the traffic signal controller, This program is very positive in that it allows our maintenance Ili personnel to operate and maintain a standardized system. This i reduces material and labor costs which we feel is cost beneficial. we also receive reimbursement for labor. 3 Please advise if you need further information, 3 tip-- J Py Cla kF P 0989E j i 3 s r $66-8200 TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) CITY of DNAITOW, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, I MEMORANDUM ` Lt f f 1' 1 l1 DATE: June 4* 1991 # Clark, Director of Engineering & Transportation T0: Jerry BROtli Jeff Gann, Traffic Signal Technician ` I 3., SUBJECT: Estimate of Traffic Control Equipment needed for Ave D at 135E and for Acme at U,s. 377 j Ave D & 135: Cost $6e456.00 Transyt 1880EL Controller Closed Loop Diamond operation complete with all plugables and 12EL Nema Plus Monitor LCD home & U.Se 3771 Cost $6,185000 s, Transyt 1880EL Closed Loop 8 Phase Complete with all plugables and 129L Monitor LCD 0989E t f I F4JP!}= 1 I 47.ys.111(~ 1 ,y y. S77}Ht71; 1 - \ , Ct Q 1y EA• 01 RECTOA , COMMISSION STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ENGINE ARNOLD EfA 01AECT R ROBERT H. OEOMAN. CHAIRMAN AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION RAY STOKER, JR. P.O. Box 307 f DAUAS, TEAS T511W%1 - WAYNE B. 0000LESTEN Ilpl 7kf;a y j April 240 1991 Control: 195-3-430 eta. CONTACT: j I.H. 35E% Traffic Signals at Ave D U.S. 377: f City wolfs at AcMs In the D1911toln r ~ Denton County LAPR Mr. Jerry Clark, P.E. Director of Engineering and TYanssportatian 4991 city of Denton 215 E. 1'bKiMVY Denton, T imm 76201 i Dear Mr. Clark: herewith, four (4) copies of the agreement for the St is to We am forwarding, the city the scat of parnishin4 the traffic signalConttollers at the reimburse above locations. We are also farwarclin5, for your referer7cer a copy of an 0muted agreemnartt with the City of Dentono please runtish us a detailed cost estimate Cr~ 2 on page F. obit 1WI to this agreement and insert the cost figure of 6 of this agreement- The detailed cost estimate should straw the ornPCIIIII►t Wts of the carttYOll*r cabinet that the City of Denton psropc to iUrnish on this peaty which would i controller time: . aoe►fliut incluc3a such iteu~s as the cabinet ~lifiers, eaccessories, ta. acd contro which woulu ba shown Oct monitor, load switches, detectors sup Exhibit 11AP.. t the apprcpriats City officials and please have these documents eoo ed by ; return three oout&4rpart origin8ls to this office for our You may retain one copy for your files. After all parties have wacuted U*" documents, o campletaly emacuted original will be returned to you. Fbr further information, please contact Ms. Melanie Young, P.E. at 320-6229. Your cooperaticn in cooplatirg this pert is appreciated. Sincerely, Adnan M. Turk, p.E. supervising Resident Engineer I Attadnnee+ts i T r . tK-, IAA IM f 1 j , Agreement No. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TRAVIS AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLERS BY A MUNICIPALITY THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the State of Texas, acting by and through the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation, t hereinafter called the "State't,'and the City of Denton Denton county, Texas, hereinafter called the "City", acting by and through its duly authorized officers as evidence by Resolution/Ordinance No. , hereinafter acknowledged by reference. W I T -N E S S E T H i WHEREAS, the State owns and maintains a system of highways and roadways, s including I.H. 35E and U.S. 377, in the City of Denton r and WHEREAS, the City has requested the State to reimburse the cost of j obtaining and installing a traffic signal controller at the intersection of I.H. 35E at Ave D and U.S. 377 at Acme, hereinafter called the "Project"j and WHEREAS, the State and City wish to cooperate in the construction of this Projects and WHEREAS, the City desires that equipment be provided that is compatible t with standard signal operation andl and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City and the State for the City j to assist the State in supplying traffic control equipment on the Projects and 1 WHEREAS, on the th day of the State Highway and Public Transportat on Commission passed Mi ute order No. , approving the Projectt and WHEREAS, the State is authorized to enter into an agreement with the city for the Project pursuant to Article 6673-b, V.A.C.S.t A G R E E M E N T NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements of the parties hereto to be by them respectively kept and performed as hereinafter set forth, it is agreed is followss Page 1 of 6 1 41 Article 1. Contract Period This agreement becomes effective on final execution by the State and shall remain in effect as long as said traffic signal controller is in operation at the described location, or unless otherwise terminated or modified as hereinafter provided. Article 2. Construction Responsibilities ;j A. For all items of construction other than furnishing and installing the traffic signal controller, the State will prepare the construction plans, advertise for bids, and let th'e constriction contract, or otherwise s i provide for the construction and will supervise the construction as required by said plans. The State will secure the city's approval of construction plans prior to award of contract. ; B. The furnishing and installation of the traffic signal controller will be part of the construction to be undertaken by the City, and the State will reimburse the City for its contribution to the Project, as prescribed under Article 3, "Compensation." Article 3. Compensation A. The maximum amount under this agreement without modification is $ A cost estimate of the work authorized under this agreement is marked "Attachment Aattached hereto and made a part of 1 this agreement. f B. The State will reimburse the City the cost of furnishing and installing the traffic signal controller as to the location and manner of construction as shown and described in the plane and specifications. C. The state will reimburse th4 City for properly supported costs incurred under the terms and conditions of this agreement. Costs incurred prior to j the issuance of a written "Work Order" by the state will not be reimbursed. Reimbursement will be made by the State to the City for labor, equipment use, materials, supplies, travel expensesp and warehouse or material handling charges provided the City has paid from City funds their obligations covering items of costs previously billed. Article 4. Payments A. The City shall submit the State's Form 132, Billing Statement, or other type of invoice acceptable to the State upon completion of the Project and the State's acceptance thereof. ` B. An original and four (4) copies of the Billing Statement should be submitted to the following address P.O. Box 3067, Dallas, Texas 75221-3067. C. All billing statements shall be properly documented, summarizing the costs by description of work performed, quantity of materials and devices, unit price, labor costs, and extensions. Page 2 of 6 Fadpr;Y 63 D. The State shall make payment to the city within thirty (30) days from receipt of the City's request for payment, provided that the request is properly prepared, executed, and documented. E. Unsupported charges or charges after final acceptance by the State will not be considered eligible for reimbursement. The State will prepare a final audit upon completion of the work authorized or at any time an audit is deemed to be in the best interest of the State. Article S. Personnel, Equipment, and Material A. The City will use labor and sdpervisory personnel employed directly by the City, and using city-owned machinery, equipment, and vehicles necessary for the work. In the event that the City does not have the necessary machinery, equipment, and vehicles necessary to perform the work; the machinery, equipment, and vehicles may be rented or leased as.. j necessary at the low bid price submitted by at least two approved bidders. i3 B. Reimbursement for the use of materials purchased by other than competitive bid procedures will be made only if such procedures are shown S to be in the public interest and provided the State shall have given prior approval for the use of said materials. All materials used for the work } shall be new and undepreciated. , Article 6. Inspection of Work A. The State shall make suitable, frequent, and complete inspection of all materials, and equipment, and the work of installation to determine and permit certification that- the Project and its components meet all applicable requirements of the plans and opecifioations in suitable condition for operation and maintenance by the City after its completion. B. The City will provide opportunities, facilities and representative samples, as may be required, to enable the State to carry on suitable,, frequent, and complete inspection of all materials, and application LJ methods, sufficient to afford determination and certification by the State that all parts of the installation and the component materials comply with the requirements of the approved plans and specifications. The State will promptly notify the City of any failure of materials, equipment or installation methods, and the city will take such measures as necessary to j obtain acceptable systems components and installation procedures without delay. Article 7. Maintenance and operation Responsibilities Upon completion of the Project, the City agrees to operate and maintain at its own expense, the traffic signals as a part of the street system and agrees to assume the cost of all electrical power required for signal operation, including the electrical power needed during test periods. Article a. Termination A. This agreement may be terminated by one of the following conditions: (1) By mutual agreement and consent of both parties. Page 3 of 6 t i (2) By the State by writing notice to the City as consequence of failure by the City to perform the services and obligations set forth in a satisfactory manner and within the limits provided, with proper allowances being made for circumstances beyond the control of the City. (3) By either party, upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other. B. If, at any time, the City fails to assume the construction responsibilities as prescribed herein or the maintenance and operation i responsibilities for the traffic signals in a satisfactory manner as determined by the State, the State reserves the right to assume the construction responsibilities or to arrange for maintenance and operation responsibilities at the expense of the City. Article 9. Indemnification To the extent permitted by law, the City shall save harmless the state from all claims and liability due to activities of itself, its agents, or ' employees, performed under this agreement and which result from an error, r omission, or negligent act of the City or of any person employed by the i City. The City shall also save harmless the State from any and all 1 expenses, including attorney fees which might be incurred by the State in litigation or otherwise resisting said claim or liabilities which might be imposed on the State as the result of such activities by the Citye its agents or employees. Article 10. Remedies Violation or breach of contract terms by the City shall be grounds for termination of the agreement, and any increased cost arising from the City's default, breach of contract, or violation of terms shall bR paid by f the City. This agreement shall not be considered as specifying the i exclusive remedy for any default, but all remedies existing at law and in equity may be availed of by either party and shall be cumulative. Article 11. Disputes Should disputes arise as to responsibilities and obligations as set forth in this agreement, the State's decision shall be final and binding. Article 12. Subletting The City shall not sublet or transfer any portion of its responsibilities 3 and obligations under this agreement unless specifically authorized in writing by the State. In the event subcontracts are entered into by the city, the subcontractors must adhere to the provisions of.this agreement. Article 13. Amendments Changes in the time frame, character, responsibilities, or obligations authorized herein shall be enacted by written amendment. Any amendment to this agreement must be executed by both parties. Page 4 of 6 Wwl~ Y {Uk+:il j LVYY'iA ! Article 14. Insurance If the City is a self--insured entity or the City contracts the work defined hereunder with an independent contractor, the city and/or its i contractor shall extend the protection of it's self.-insurance to the State ! for any and all damages and injuries arising from the city's performance I under the Agreement, by naming the State as an "Additional Insured" under existing self-insurance policies. The city shall label such documentation EXIBIT F. Article 15. Successors and Assigns The City shall not assign or otherwise transfer its rights or obligations { under this agreement except with the prior written consent of the State, Article 16. Inspection of City's Books and Records The State shall, for purpose of termination of the agreement prior to completion, examine the books and records of the City for the purpose of checking the amount of the work performed by the City at the time of contract termination. The City shrill maintain all books, documentso papers, accounting records and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred ! and shall make such material available at their office during the contract ; period and for three (3) years from the date of final payment under the ) F agreement, for inspection by the state or any of their duly authorized i representatives, shall have access to all records of the City which are 4 directly pertinent to this agreement for the purpose of making audit, examinations, excerpts and transcriptions. . ~ F Article 17. Legal Construction In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this agreement shall for any reason, be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not 1 affect any other provision thereof and this agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. i j Article 18. Governing Laws and Venue I I This agreement shall be construed under and in accordance with the laws of the state of Texas. Any legal actions regarding the parties obligations under this agreement must be filed in Travis County, Texas. Article 19. Prior Agreements Superseded page 5 of 6 i %3~14'k:F.f IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The State and the City have signed duplicate i counterparts of the Agreement. CITY OF Denton THE STATE OF TEXAS certified as being exeoated for the purpose and effect of activating Hy: and/or carrying out the orders$ Signature established policies, or work j programs heretofore approved and authorized by the State Highway and Public Transportation commission under the authority of Minute Order Typed Name and Title 8251: Hy: signature Date Traffic Operations Engineer Date 1 t f f f F i s r l Page 6 of 6 4 *v '.r EYtieJ4~jGp f L{f(Mpi,~q i %4Wpd0CS\tBCO i c, ORDINANCE NO. j AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITI OF DENTON AND E THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLERS WITHIN t I THE CITY OF DENTON: AND PROVIDIN^ AN EFFECTIVE DATE. I THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the City Council hereby approves and autho- rizes the Mayor and City Secretary to execute and attest, respec- tively, the agreement between the City of Denton and The State of Texas providing for the furnishing of traffic signal control equip- ment within the City of Denton, under the terms and conditions con- tained in said agreement which is attached hereto. SECTION II. That the expenditure cf funds in an amount not to exceed $12,641.00 is hereby authorized. SECTION II That this ordinance shall become effective im mediately upon its passage and approval. 5 PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1991. r } BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR f ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY i r BY., fk APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY ° BY: i . A'FYIti11T,. STATE OF TEXAS ,k COUNTY OF DEMN f ti l I , the duly appoin,~3, qualified and acting city secretary of the City Of ; i, Denton , Texas, hereby certify that the foregoing pages constitute a true and correct copy of an ordinance/resolution duly 1 passed by the City Council at a meeting held on A.D., 19T, at o'clock M. t i s To certify which, witness my hand and seal of the City of € Denton Texas, this day of - , 19_0 ~ at Denton Texas. 4 , a ; 1 City Secretary of the City of l Texas r ; Denton , { t VhdE""~'F1` V A DATE: 07/ 16/91 CIT COUNCIL p_.&T' E0RT VORMAT , Mayor and Members of the City Council TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: REGARDING CITY COUNCIL CONSIDEICKOR•Y, AND LOCUST CFROMN6 A -M' -06 BLOCKS OF OAK, ELM, ' p,M. ON SATtIRDAY~ SEPTEMBER 28, 1991 FOR "COUNTY SEAT SATURDAY" CELEBRATION f Recommend approval. j } the Den central BUBie~s For six consecutive ion hasraponao ednCounty Seat 9aturnyg District Assooft a celebration he d wntown Courthouse This celebrati~:' community by has grown into one of the most popular in Denton and last f year attracted over 7,000 vi.sitors to the Square- The Denton County Commisalonera Court has permisaionstopuse granting for this community event by the courthouse and grounds without charge, To provide for the safety of the community and provide he space for special events, it is necessary th6at at the streets on the square be closed from 6 a.m. the day of the event only. The attached petitions in favor of the street closing reflect the support of the merchants and property owners for this event. Two businesses will not sign the petition In contacted favor ofhthe j street closing, but have been it: T do Song anand d T ~ L indicated they will not oppose signed the Petition in Those Shoes. One business has sig Pawn orposition: McBride Music and establishments onvst~eetssthat will their be buildings nduringothe back entrances event h r Fi 19.;y 1 a r 1 I i Property owners were mailed a letter of explanation and asked to return a signed petition. As of this date, we have not received a written response from Robert Penley, Emma Lou Floyd, Stewart Title, Hershel Kornblatt and Joseph Jagoe,'but have received verbal approval through telephone contact. We have not received a response nor been able to contact by telephone Bonnett Resources, which is listed as the owner of record of Ruby's Diner on j the Square, but the tenant has signed the petition in favor of the closing. All other property owners' have y k signed the petition. ' PROORAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR OROUPS AFFECTED, None t' i I MCA-L-1-MR-A-01 1 None Yd ully subsn tted, Harrell j City Manager ! ?-e d by; lesHager reet Program Appr V Fran H. Rob na, ATCP Executive Director Planning and Development j fI i r I ' 1Y,1. a eRtil7tpMt A ' ' REQUEST FOR STR T CLOSURZ Organixat.ion requesting street closure DEMON CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICII ASSOCIATION Contact Person- JANE FILES Address: 100 WEST OAK SUITE 204 DPMN, TX 76201 i . Phone Number: 817-566-8529 ' Street To at C 1 o s e d -1, OAK, BW, HICKORY, LOCUST around the COUMOUSE SQJARB Date and Time To Se Closed:' 9-28-91 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. Intersecting streets: see above Reason For Closure- COUNTY SEAT ,SATURDAY Y Please complete the bottom portion of this toirm. residents and/or businesses affected by the street Closure M= be contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure, NAM AUT I o Z •.~~raR/oPposl 1. DH P e, i . 2. s 3. LAS) Qt ~n~1s1C. 1 L~~i~nJ-~ ~ R~3 oti 4 i 6 l s 10. 2993C/5 i j y pe. , 1 E REQUEST FOR STREET___ L AIU Organization requesting street closure DEMON CENTRAL, BUSINESS DISTRI" ASSOCIATION Contact Person: JANE BILES Address: 100 WEST OAK SUITII 204 llENTON, TX 76201 u` Phone Number: 817-566-8529 I EI,M, HICKORYO LOCUST around the COIJRTHOlJS1 S(211ARL' stcast To Be Closed- OAt p 9-28-91 6 a,m. to 6 p,m, Date and Time To Be Closed: Intersecting streets: see above CGUNTY SEAT SATURDAY season Ivor Closure! . b 3 Please complete the bottom portion of this form residents' and/or businesses affected by the street Closure MW contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure.' NAM AUTHORIZED f ' ~QjDYIGS ~ ~~J ; filar s ' 2 i f -~o~n titi ,uw~1 3. ; 4. ? I 1 6. 76 f , l f 9 / 10. L 2483C/5 U8S F S E C OSU organization cequestinq street clcauce DBNI'ON CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT`ASSOCIATION I JANE BILES Contact Persons 100 WEST OAK SUITF 204 DBMON, TX 76201 Address. i phone Number: 817-566-8529 OAKS Eim. HICKORY, LOCJST around the COUItT1l E W)MB j Street To Be Closed. 9.28-91 6 a.m, to 6 p.m. y Date and Time Ta Be Closed: h Intersectinq Streets: see above ; aWN SEAT SATURDAY Reason For Closures residents } i Please couplets the bottou Portion of this faro. be and/or businesses affected by the street closure , tavoc contacted and sign below with an indication of being cc in opposition to the street closure. } NAME AUTHORIZED ' (r. i t GhiMUI SEE 3. A- IL,A 5 , e11~s F Cs" A ~ loll- j 9 ~C GLF f~ ~StSp(C5 'F-sco La S ~I . i 10. 2493C/S i I i 1 11^-'f.{eh vE T o sT t; 0SUR [qi ,Organization requesting street closure DEMON CEMIRAL a )SINL'SS DISTRICT` ASSOCIATION i Contact Person: JANE BILLS 76201 ~ Address: 100 WEST OAK SUITT 204 DBNPON, TX 817-566-8529 Phone Number: Street To Be Clossd: ' OAK+ E+ HICKORY, LOCUST around the COURTHOUSE SQIfARE 9-28-91 6 to 6 p.m. i Date and Time To Be Closed: see above Intetsecting Streets: COUNTY 5P.AT SATURDAY Reason For Closuce: residents this C- Ptease complete the bottom Poctio the straetocclosute be and/or businesses attected by of being in tav°e and sign below with an indication contacted of in opposition to the attest closute• 4 AUTHORIZED U S% NAME roules 4-humz C. t! 3.4 r 4. e, DYN,r.B ~f1lTu+G rw 5. ~ 9. ( p I 1 14. 29A3C/5 I y F REQUEST FOR STREET CT OSURR .Organization requesting street closure. DENTON CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRIC'II ASSOCIATION Contact Person: JANE BILES Address: 100 WEST OAK SUITE 204 DENTON, TX 76201 817-566-8529 Phone Number., Street To Be Ctosedv, OAKt BUI, HICKORY, LOUIST around the COURMJOUSE SQUARB Date and Time To Be Closed: 9-28-91 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. Intersecting streets: see above 1 Reason For Closure; Cowry SEAT SATURDAY Please complete the bottom portion of this fora. and/or businesses affected by the street closuc~ residents contacted and sign below with an indication of beiaq inlavoc or in opposition to the street closure. NMa AUTHORIZED Or BUSINESS .FAVOR/APPAQt C;Vi c, ~~i r~~i+t 3.Fulni4tAile,Yo~ 4 9 10 Cl rnwvV's 9:;01000Q 2103C/s .i i i REOUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE ocganiza~ion requesting street closure DENT'ON CENMAL BUSINESS DISTRIC'D ASSOCIATION Contact Person: JANE RILES Address: 100 WEST OAK SUITE 204 DEWON, TX 76201 Phone Number: 817-566-8529 1 Street To Be Closed.OAK, ELM, HICKORY, LOCUST around the COURTHOUSE SQUARE Date and Time To Be Closed: 9-28-91 6 aFmr to 6 p.mF_ 1 Intecsectinq Streets: see above 5 Reason >•or Closure: COUNTY SEAT SATURDAY Please complete the bottom portion of this fogs. ALL residents . ' and/or businesses affected by the street closure egg be contacted and sign below with an indication of beinq in favor or in opposition to the street closure. } AUTHORIZED k 2. 3. 4 5 i 7. e. s. lo. 29B3C/5 i 4 1 r n RIQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURLr I • Organization requesting street closure DENTON CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRIO ASSOCIATION Contact Ferfon: JANE BILL'S 100 WIS'f OAK SUITE 204 DENTON, TX 76201 > Address. Phone Number,,- 817-566-8529 P: ^ HICKORY, LOCUST around the COURTHOUSE SZUARE OAI~, Street To Be Closed: E 9-28-91 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. Date and Time To Be Closed: Intersecting Streets: see above i CaiNIY SEAT SATURDAY r Reason !or closures Please complete the bottom portion of this form. y residents and/or businesses affected by the street closure be contacted and sign below with an indication of being, in favor l or in opposition to the street closure. a kk I NA1C AUTHORIZED 2. r r2 Ab 3. g. i 4 6• 4 , 7 1 9. 10. ! 2903C/5 1 IN . . A p..r S.rrz.vv 1 1 REOUEST FOR S'£REET CLOSURE Ocganixation Coquetting street closure DENTON CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICII ASSOCIATION i Contact Person: JANE BILES Address: 100 WEST OAK SUITS 204 DENTON, TX 76201 s Phone Numbec: 817-566-8529 Street To Be Closed: OAK, ELM, HICKORY, LOCUST around the COURTHOUSE SQUARE Date and Time To 8e Cloted: 9"28-91 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. C Intersecting streats: see above ti COUNIY SEAT SATURDAY Reason roc Closure. r r J Please couplete the bottoa portion of this torn. &k cosidents j and/or businesses affected by the street aIOSUre MUST be contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the strut closure. NAM AUTHORIZED or BUSINESS TURR /?~VOL22219 Y aLr. gr. 1. JCvSC1r' ~:s:Crtit 2 3. 4 i 4 5. 6. 7. • } 10. 2r83C/5 M t REOU ST FOR STREET CLOSM Organization requesting street closure DEMON CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ASSOCIATION Clnt#ct PeCaMw JANE BILES Address: 100 TEST OAK SUITE 204 DF,NfoN, TX 76201 Fhone Number: 817-566-8529 Street To Be Closed OAK, BDlp HICKORY, LOCUST around the COURTHOUSE SQUARE y I Date and Time To Be Closed: 9-28-91 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. j~ Intersecting Streets: see above I Reason For Closure: COUNTY SEAT SATURDAY i Please complete the bottom portion of this form. resident. ` cad/or businesses affected by the street closure P~aaz~ bi contacted and sign below with an indication of being in'tavoe or in opposition to the street closure. f NAME AUTHORIZED 2. 3 5. 6. i 7 r 9. 3 10. i 29A3C/S - l e REOtn'ST FOB STREET CLOSURE organization requesting street closure DENPON CHNIRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT` ASSOCIATION Contact Person: JANE RILES Address: 1.00 WEST OAK SUITE 204 DENPON, TX 76201 Phone Number;.. 817-566-8529 Street To Be Closed:- OAKO FIM, HICKORY, LOCUST around the COUR HOUSE S~1)ARE Date and Time To Be Closed: 9"28-91 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. Intersecting Streets: see above ` COUNTY SEAT SATURDAY Reagon For Closure: f i Please complete the bottom portion of this form. cosidents and/or businesses affected by the street closure K be 1 contacted and sign below with an indication of beinq in favor or in opposition to the street closure. 1 i s NAM AUTHORIZED ' I 1 aEi Cpq°lG.~ • UQVILY+~ ~ 1 2 11 ? W, A I(LM N r r uJ v ~f 4. • 5. 7. I,. s. t 10. i 2963C/5 v°4 i REQUEST FOR STR%ZTSLQ-6-U- M Organization cequestinq street closucs DuN1'ON CENTRAL BUSINESS D7STRICP ASSOCIATION Contact PecsonI JANE BILBS Address: 100 WEST OAY1 SUITE 204 DENTON, TX 76201 Phone Number % 817-566-8529 Street To Be Closed:•,.Og, P41t 11ICKORY, LOCUST around the COURTHOUSE 5(ZI1ARE { 9-28-91 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. f I Date and Time To Be Closed: . see above Intersecting Streets. COUNV SPAT SATURDAY Reason Tor Closure: Y i y Please complete the bottom portion of this form. too)-dents ; and/or businesses affected by the street closure MW be contacted and ■iqn below with an indication of beinq in favor ; or in opposition to the street closure. F AUTNO ZE ~ NAME CAC 4 bt'tw m4 2. j G 3. I 4 i c 5. 6' t a. _ ff 9. 10. i 2993C/5 k , i d ~jREOUEST FOR STRL+ET CLOSURE ,ocganization cequestinq street cloaure,_~, DEN1'ON CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ASSOCIATION Contact Person: JANE BILES Address: 100 WEST OAK SUITE 204 DEMON, TX 76201 Phon♦ Number: 817-566-8529 Street To Be Closed: OAK, ELM, HICKORY, LOCUST around the COURTHOUSL SQUARE Date and Time To Be Closed: 9-28-91 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. I tntersootinq streets= see above l season For Closures COUNTY SEAT SATURDAY t J { i. Please co091ete the bottom poction of this form. residents j aad/oc businesses affected Ly the street alosure ~ be a contacted and sign below with as indication of being in iavoc or in opposition to the street closure. I NA>X AUTHOR 1 ZED slawl"Mil t , 1, 1 a ~ w cam. rG s~rl ~ ~ fPaS~E 2. T 3 I j 5 a c is+.m 1 6. 1 A. I 9 10. 2963C/S 1 E I E H - R*nrrt~gT !OR 3TR -L"~'L' ~LOStl tE~ organization requesting street closure DENTON CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICIIASSOCIATION Contact Perron: JANE 9I4S 76201 Address; 100 WEST OAK SUITE 204 DENtON, TX 817-5b6-8529 Phone Number., LOCUST around the COURTHOUSE SQWV, OAK, Ems, HICKORY, Street To Be Closed:" 9.28-91 6 a^ to 6 P.M. Hate and Tine TO 9e Closeds ; see above Intetseatiag streetss~ cWM r ; . SEAT SA'nWAY Reason ror Closuees ~ 8L~ Please ooMplete the bOttO% Portion Of this torn, residents is ouc* and/or businesses atteate With anti street dl be ing i~n~tavbe f, ~tacttd cad. sign bolo o S" or in opposition to the street olosure. AUTHOR I ID { 1. € z 3 5. :a 6. f 76 tl . ' 10 . 2987C/'S s REOU* T Pot STREET CLOSURE Organization raquestinq street closure-,~ DENTON CENTRAL. BUSINESS DISTRICT ASSOCIATION Contact person: JANE RILES Address: 100 WEST OAK SUITE 204 DBNTON, 'rx 76201 Phone Number: 317-566-8529 street To 8e Closedt OAK, E1~1, HICKORY, LOCUST around the WMTHOU5E SgIARE C I Data and Time To 9e Closed:' 9-28-91 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. 1 ~ Intersecting streetst See above i (X) KN SEAT SATURDAY Reason Pat Closures s I + . Please complete bottom portion of this form, a44 residents : the 3 and/or businasses affected by the street alosurs, be contacted and sign belov with as indioation of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure. NAM AUTHORIZED ~ o!_ RUBI I 'F~.f►1i~4 , S 4. 6. 7, [ e. r 9 1.00 29S3C/S YI 11 it RZOU ST FOR 8T EF$T~La9 RE ,organization requesting street closurs DEMON CBNIRAL BUSINRSS DISTKICr.ASSOCIATION Contact Person: JMT: BILPS Address: 100 WP.ST OAK SUITES 204 DEMON, TX 76201 Phone Numberi_817-566-8529 Street To Be Closs'di- OK 131VI HICKORY, LOCUFT around the COURIIlOUSI; SQtJAJ2B 9-28-91 6 8^ to 6 p•m. Date and Time To Be Closed, E Intetsectinq Streets: see above 5 CMNrY SEAT SAI MAY s Reason For Closure: ; j Please complete the bottom portion of this fora. residents and/or businesses affected by the street Closure be contacted and sign below With an indication of being n favor or in opposition to the street closure. NAM AUTHORIZED TWOR/Oph I 2. 4. r1 i r p 6• L' o Mrs' 7 c <z~ , r~~w,~. 9(J ITK )J6J~c ,r✓~.~ Chedla~- L'a~~tr~.a.Lace. ?J ' 1f ~ (5I "In c,,v-A,(M ~s , awn►if QT ~u~~~ OrganlzaCios requesting street'closurs DEMON CF. MI BUSINESS DISTRICP ASSOCIATION Contact Persoa: JA~1E BIDES Address: WEST OAK SUITE 204 DENTON, TX 76201 100 - 817-566-9529 ; Phone Number: OAK, ELM+ HICKORY, LOCUST around the COURTHOUSE SQUARE Street To Be Closeds ; 9-28-91 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. Date and Time To Be Closods see above tatersecting streets: C~'flJKN SEAT SATURDAY Reason ?at Closures &k cesidenta ` the this togolosure tId be please complete the bottom Portion contacted businesses affected by and sign below with as indication of being o tavor. contacted and/or or in opposition to the street closure. 11UTHOB t ZLt1 f a LlfE~~ 1. L~ 1 L~K+ b'~': I I 24 I 3. 5. 6. e. la, 2963C/5 VA. rREQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE i ,organization requesting street closure ~AJ1"t7Als~f~RA~.. LStaEifIJESS DI,~`[IGTfEtT14k1 Contact Person: Blues I Address: I~L1 g" Ear, 5QiTgLIP& t*%-IM •rlis2f0) Phone Number: SI1 1&4 8601Y Street To 8e Closed ( utirr~B.~~ j ~r fit'nrn~nd fY►~, t~ f Data and Time To Be Closed; (DCleM 'b (ORM Intersecting Streets:V"ft&QA=g4' t a Reason For Closure: 000MV CF~7 S~srUR~~ I 1 Please couplet* the bottom portion of this torn. &k residents and/or businesses affected by the street closure MM be contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure. i. NAM AUTHORIZED of~ 119MATUIS FAVO /opt asc ELl-f t. E W. ~.1LU ` Y' P -'9? 11C-061 Aj V-0 CO A14" 2. 3. 4. 5. ~ b. 7. + i 8. - } 9i 10. ~ 2983C/S E I z 1 100 Wert Oak o Suite 2( ~ Denton, TX 78201 MAIN STREZV (817) 688-9629 s DENTON June 20, 1991 Dear and to the And O's"m ity oration Seat Saturday is a celebration a the hmercha is and County tradition of the ipast. It is s g overnaent to the the Central Btiseinera District Arsocounty•g o The Courthouse professionals in on.the.Square will be transformed frog the seat oP c meat ~f social functions ar it war in 18960 when the Cattle trail Case right through tows. Once again$ the avant will require that we limit access toinahaddition to pedestrian trafEio. fhs City of Denton requires that, signatures signatures frog businsra owners in the effected area, we collect from property owners* ate.your signature on the enclosed fore we have enclosed an we would appzaci envelope for your convenience in returning the signed fort to the Main street office by June 30, 1991- Yu November, 19900 County Saat Saturday won the -Vin AS festival ontinue the traditionaofDthisawardAsmociatim, With award for Bert Promotional your cooperation, we ca in Denton. questions Thank you in advance for your prompt rsaponre. If you have any q the street closure or county Seat Saturday, please do not hesitate to cal to call l us at 566-8529 or Metro 4342520, extension 8529. Sinnsraly, Jane Bilge main street Manager f WP Enclosure l 3413r j 4 1 .lslmr • RESOLUTION NO. r ~ r A RESOLUTION TEMPORARILh'CLOSING THE 100 BLOCK OF NORTH ELM STREET, 100 BLOCK OF WEST OAK STREET, 100 BLOCK OF NORTH LOCUST STREET AND 100 BLOCK OF WEST HICKORY STREET ON SEPTEMBER 28, 19911 AND PRO- VIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 1 I WHEREAS, the Central Business District was once the social and Ii commercial center of Denton Countyi and WHEREAS, the merchants and professionals who Oontinue to servo the people of Denton from within this historic district wish to commemorate the spirit and tradition of its pastt and WHEREAS, since 18961 the "Court Square" area wad transformed each Saturday from the seat of county government into the social { gathering place for its citizensl and WHEREAS, the Denton County Courthouse remains the historical and sentimental center of our county and a familiar landmark on the r Denton horizont and WHEREAS, all abutting merchants and professionals surrounding the area have given their permission to the temporary closing of said streetst and WHEREAS, County Seat Saturday is open to the general public of the City and County of Dentont and WHEREAS, in order to provide adequate space for.County Seat Saturday, a celebration, and in order to protect the safety of citizens who attend, the City Council of the City of Denton deems it is necessary to temporarily close the 100 Block of North Ella € Street, 100 Block of West Oak Street, 100 Block of North Locust Street and 100 Block of West Hickory Street, comprising the "Court- house Square", from the hours of 6100 a.m. until 6100 p.m. on ! September 280 19911 NOW, THEREFORE, i THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVE51 5ECTION 1. That the 100 Block of North Elm Street, 100 Block of West Oak Street, 100 Block of North Locust Street and 100 $look of West Hickory Street, comprising the "Courthouse Square", shall be temporarily closed as public streets or thoroughfares of any kind or character whatever on September 28, 1991 from 6100 a.m, until 6100 p.m. for the purpose of holding "County seat Saturday", SECTION TI. That the City Manager shall direct the appro- priate City Department to erect barricades at the 100 Block of North Elm Street, 100 Block of West Oak Street, lnn Block of North Locust Street and 100 Block of West Hickory street, at 6100 a^ and to have the same removed at 6100 p.m, on September 28, 1991. M ENTION Iii. That the portion of the above described streets shall revert back to the City for normal traffic activity immedi- ately from and after 6100 prm, on September 280 1991. i SECTION IV. That this resolution shall take effect and be in full force and effect from and after the date of its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1991. } F; BOB A LEBERRY) MAYOR I ~ ATTESTt JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY $ APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY /1 '4 11110 BYS I i f i i r Page 2 1 } d'+, races R . l I CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT of the City Council l and Members : Mayor T0 City Manager Lioyd V. tiarreil, FROM: of Denton to Approve a resolut Grant for City apply for TI'S II oil overcharge rant Funds SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION: Approval SUMMAXY: zation. i s „ r The City is applying for 3 new grants f0r signal Ynoon SACKOROUNDi ro Yam$ The City was awarded grants in both previous grant p g TLS I and TM. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTY11): and Motoriate City Traffic Division. Electric Departments = ' j FISCAL IMPACTS $153,949 with city A 75.25 split of the oostifaallnthree protects are awarded, estimated costs of $ 38ovi487 ded with labor in kind services. Most of this post is p I 0773E j T t I ~C 1 t CITY 1D Of DENTONr TEXAS MUN AL BUILDING / DEN 70N, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566-8200 MEMOKANDUM . DATH;: July 10, 1991 Lloyd Harrell, City Manager Jetty Clark, Director of Engineering & Transportation FROM: ' t SUBJECT: Traffic Light Syncronization Program II (TLS 110) The State of Texas Oi.l Overcharge Fund still has sufficient funds to continue the traffic grants to izat The State has released another Traffic bight Sync called TLS II. We previously participate d ~inn''LS Grant Pr ogram (Traffic Management) and received very nice grants for each. They We would like to submit three projects for Tn to Parkway 380 Elm consi~teratton, ar,et (1) Carroll (3}Boulevard afrom Sher 288 to 135 to Loop ' Syoamore. Carroll and US 380 were originally time id under our ur first never Loop System Project four years ago City pars never in timed as part of a closed Loop System. these contracts is mainly made ,:p of in-kind labor that the already funds. A smaller portion of our costs includes City funding equipment such as communication cable, We have that item in stock at the warehouse. ects propose under r The estimated total cost for 8the 2, tArlocalomatch of $38, the TLS II grant is $153,94os is required. Of this amountf ; or 25 percent of bteta $23,685.20 will furided+ by in-kind services of Ththe is rsonnelo This e Engineering and Transportation Department p leaves a balance of $141802.26 which will be funded by the Traffic Division it the grants are awarded. They have The grant programs have been positive to Dent Eagle ($370470:1e S ncronizaticn 'PLSI, funded the Bell Avenue and the Carroll at US 380 Drive Syncroniaation TM (41, recious in our turn lane ($131006). These monies arovale o€ phis resolution present economic state. Council app participation the submits nth city of 25$. author izewetreCOstate to 4 mmend approval I _ ~C4/►k e E SS+af..[f3 1 i 1 II 1 i CRN~CENT S 1 , h PANHANDLE s N E_ GN CONGRE55 1 PAiiKWAY ~ , ~ } W. OAK i w, HwxoRY PROJECT ANA t ! >~uu~ERRY ApT ~ 13,21 'MUD L PRAIRIE HIGHLAND MAPLE EAGLE I 1 it . yyy i r { 9 NORTH . d m 4W iWO' ' jjmw 2575' 2875' 1100' SHERMM 4000' 5500' 2000' 0 ' U.S. 38 W. OAK W. HICKORY EXISTING SYSTEM i PROPO$SD 9YSTEM (6y City of Denton) r~ ADT 15,624 r h:9iSkct f~. i i i PARKWAY , AL mum Mo KINNEY j PECAN W. OAK I W, HICKORY WALNUT NORTH 1 N MULBERRY AlEft PROJECT 1 AREA SYCAMORE ADT _ 5,55a y i 1 ry 'renr:ry- Carroll System State Department of Highways and Public Transportation Traffic Light Synchronization Program II Grant Application t) Legal Applicant 2) Vendor Identification Number: a. Applicant Name City of Denton 17560005146000 Engineering Dept. 3) Project Traffic Engineer or Manager b. Organizational Unit i c, StreetlP,O,Box 215 E. McKinney St. (Name&Telephone) Paul Iwuchukwu (817)566-8358 d. City Denton_ e, county n .on a) Number of Signalized Interseetlonr f. State Texas g• Zip 76201 1 • Injurisdictlon 63 h, Population (1990Census Bureau Figure), in coordinated systems 18 66,270 7 I et Ma ~N T • In proposed project i' Paine iwucnfiukwuge 81 St6el~p o ej; 5) Proposed Funding Attachments ; a, State Oil Overcharge funds s14. 555 , 43 a, Standard Assurances b. Local $ 4t831, 81 b. Project Area Maps c. SDHPT (if signals are maintained c, Description of Project and operated by SWIFT) S d, Quality of Service I d, Other (Specify) sn-p W77.74 e, Budget NOTE; The oil overcharge amount for equipment f, Project Task Responsibility shall not exceed 20% of the total amount of gr Debarment Certification I oil overcharge funds requested. i 6) General Information a. Are any of your project signals operated or maintained by other agencies? Yes No X If yes, describe b, Who currently makes the decisions on how to set your signals? ji g Pnp i_ppp r' y c r a'f f c, Approximately how many local staff person-years (or fraction thereof) are currently devoted to traffic j signal timing in your jurisdiction? Include all categories of effort, including data acquisition, plan development, Implementation, checking and surveillance, 24 person years I [ Comments, d, Who Is currently responsible for maintaining your signals?„ City Traffic Department," e. Do you have plans for major capital Improvements to upgrade your proposed project network? Yes No _X_ If yes, do you have a schedule, budget proposal or funds already committed? Yes No . Explain, - - - E f, Have significant changes In traffic levels or patterns In the project area occurred Asa result of new development, road Improvements, etc., since the last retiming effort? Yes _ No X s Explain, IF;ere has beets n steady growth of trafj is nn Ca o_? Boulevard since the last retiming effort in 1988. i f~.Psjll{'_ { I 4 i 6) General information, (contd.) No X g; Do you antlctpate sigmlffovementsgetc`,rwtraffic leveis or patterns ithin the next three years? h Yes je--ea as a result o new development, road P a health rowth within the next 3 ' Explahl; The Cit is ex ectin but it is ar ici ted to I year__ 9 e ' a-ter ran e of 3-5' a nu 1 d the ment needs for this project area were determined an type and features ( h. of the Explain how the e equipment q yuip a If needed, you propose for the project. Attach extra peg hh I his project, Outline local staff traffl staff that would be assigned to' an I PASSER signal timing p roe { ical age I, List below spedtE`lence prior training In and use of the ' f engineering exP a if needed, {Note; Prior exper{ence with TRANS'R 7E , j grams, and role In this project, Attach extra peg j t I and PASSER Is not requlre~'Ce attached a e i t x Ilcatlon. Also, Youi s j, Supply any additional Info d atn° of youwenswers to the previous questions IAttach extra page It may use this space to expa any needed. are based on 00n£1 ' arterial street layou_ u>ations The City s £rom the 1800,s which have 18£t street a tersections xter gig _ no ementProgram, -}C yes vehicylat movemont,si k. Was your city Involved in the flrseIL5lnrthe use oft the PASSER or TRANSYT R yes no . ~ If yes, is any additional staff tralnin glease answer question I. computer models needed! 11 yes, p Terence, number of people that would attend and whether they are local I, Indicate course date pre staff andlor consultant, local staff , consultant) I staff consultant) 1 28 3041992 1- # of people PASSER II January III 3 # of people ( loca , L _ TRANSYT 7F X February 11.13,1992 ~ Ilcatlon Is applicant, and the plicant Certification: To the best of my orixedeby the govebelief,rning body of Information the in this app )ue and COrrecti the document has been duty 31 i application is approved. tappllcantwlll comply with the attached assurances if the lant any existing local funding presently dedicated Any grant money received will supplement and not supP to signal timing efforts, Signature Harrell Cit Mann or Typed or Printed Name and Title Llo d V , _z- -Y- Date z, 6 (h) s associated with this project. The i, ui ment need hav There are no eq P rovement programs have utilized Cit 's past signal related imp uipment and it is yy lif -mainten- TRANSYT model controllers and associated et equipment pur their intention to continue such i•n orde rversto situp Y loyee learning cu, and eq f ance g and istoc emkpiling. chas t 1 { i ' 1 I I it I } 5 LN° 1 Jinx-fT.+~ 71 t etwpdoce\trafnync.r 4 i RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A TRAFFIC LIGHT SYNCHRONIZATION PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION TO PROMOTE THE CONSERVATION OF ENERGY RESOURCES, AND \ DECIJ.RING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, WHEREAS, the City of Denton recognizes that it in in the interest of the national economy to promote the conservation of energy re- ; sources and to reduce our nation's dependence on costly, foreign oil; and, t WHEREAS, the retiming of signals by the City of Denton will provide benefits to the local community in the form of improved ti i traffic flow, reduced fuel consumption, reduced vehicle operating i costs, reduced air pollutant emissions, and improved safety due to. smoother traffic flaw? and I ' 1 WHEREAS, funds have been established and are available through the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation for grants to j local governments for traffic signal retiming projectst NOW, THERE- FORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVgSt 5ECTI91". That the City Council of the City of Denton authorizes the submission of an application to the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation for a Traffic Light Synchronization grant and, if the application is selected for funding, the City Manager of the City of Denton is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City of Denton all necessary applications, contracts, and agreements to implement and carry out the purposes specified in this resolution. ~ PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1991. t , BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTESTt JtNNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY t - f ~j i APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM1 DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCN, CITY ATTORNEY j , BY" 1 f r 1 PAGE 2 i i , i. lea. . `[@q~~,J ' ANY. St c f CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Mayor and Members of the City Council ; TO: Lloyd V• Harrell, City Manager FROM: plans for property Leased to roving development and providing for SUBJECT: A Resolution app -51, Ltd., at the Denton Municipal Airports ! FOX e an effective data, t I CO IM _TI_NDAO= Board and Airport staff to RE It is the recommendation of the Airport Advisory the Building Plans and Site labeled #1 located on 390071 sq. approve being used by FoX-51r Ltd, ft. currently } f s sUM` MARY: FOX-51r Ltd,, is currently paying } There will be no cast to the city of Denton. $2,385.00 dollars per Year for this property. I BACKU~NDS } NIA OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Gn -S~_.DSPAR„TMEN'PS O This agreement will not affect any other department or group. r z FISCAL IMPACTS None. ll subm tteds Resp uy ~ i } Lloy Harre 1 City Manager } pro arced b ! j Joe ThompSon I Airport Manager 1 Appro d:. I Ri Svehla Deputy City Manager j d i . r i ,I 7 } TO: The Mayor and Members of the City Council , r t rROM: Joe Thompson, Airport Manager DATES July 110 1991 SUBJECT: A Resolution approving development plans for property Leased to FOX-511 Ltd., at the Denton Municipal j Airport; and providing for an effective date. it is the recommendation of the Airport Advisory Hoard and Airport Staff after reviewing the Building Plans and Site Plans with the DRC Committee and Building Code Enforcement staff that the submitted Building Plans and Site Plans be approved for a FOX-511 Ltd, I The First Amendment to the Commercial Lease between the City of Denton and FOX-51, Ltd., dated February 2, 1988, calls for the Lessor to develop and pay rental every two (2) years on a minimum of 39,071 sq. ft. which was enacted in 1990. Building N1 of the submitted plans is located on this 39,071 sq, ft. (see Attachment "A"). This Building's estimated cast of construction is $158,818.00 dollars with an estimated life of at least thirty (30) years: The overall jize is 98 x 100 ft. with the colors being light tan sides with a white roof to match the existing building occupied by FOX-51, Ltd. (see Attachment "B"). POX-51, Ltd.,' is a currently paying $2,385.00 dollars per year for this property. Y rr f i i 3 r ' r I i Attachment "An 1766L i E RESOLUTION NO~=_ A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AIRPORT COMMERCIAL LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND FOX-51 LIMITED, 1 AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. l_ WHEREAS, certain real prog,ECtY upon the Denton Municipal Airport was leased to Fox_ 51 Limited, a Texas partnership, by r lease agreement dated April 1, 1986; and 3 WHEREASO the City of Denton and the lessee desire to amend the lease agreement: and j , the Airport Advisory Board for the City of Denton WHEREAS, has recommended approval of the proposed airport amendments and i WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, l~ approve such interest f effTHEREFOREicient believes it operations BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: I ; SECTION I. That attached Amendment No. 1 to the airport commerc a ease agreement between the City of Denton and Fox-51 Limited dated April 1, 1986 and also attached hereto, is hereby i approved. SECTION IT, That Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the i attached ease amendment on behalf of the city and the City Secretary is hereby directed to affix this resolution, with the executed lease amendment attached, to the original airport lease effective a datenOf agreement tit April has been 8amended and the inscribing agreement the fact ~ such amendment. i SECTION III. That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. t i i f s f nJ 1 I PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1988, i RAY PH8 MAYO CITY F DENTONO 'TEXAS i J f ~ ATTEST: a L ERS { A ING TY SECRETARY C Y OF DENTON, TEXAS f APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCHf CITY ATTORNEY L CITY OF DENTORf TEXAS ~I BY: i, E ' s ia.'ttk'A"i i 2091L THE STATE OF TEXAS S FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE COMMERCIAL OPERATOR LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY OF DENTON S THE CITY OF DENTON AND FOX-51 LIMITED This lease amendment is made and executed this daY of 19,a, at Denton, Texas, by and between the City o enton ereina ter referred to as "Lessor", and Fox-5I Limited, a corporation of the State of Texas, having its principal offices at Route 1, Box 102, Denton, Texas 762050 hereinafter referred to as "Lessee". WHEREAS, Lessor owns, operates and controls the Municipal Airport (Airport) in the City of Denton, County of Denton, State of Texas; I, WHEREAS, Lessor has previously leased certain land at the Airport to Lessee for the purposes of Lessee conducting a I business as a commercial operator at the Airport, a copy of the lease agreement is attached as Exhibit C; WHEREAS, due to changed circumstances, the parties mutually desire and agree to renegotiate certain provisions of the lease agreement described above; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants contained in this Agreement, the parties agree to amend the lease as follows; WITHESSETHs The Lessor and Lessee for and in consideratlon of the rants, covenants and conditions contained herein, do hereby mutually j agree that the following provisions of the airport lease dated' April 1, 1986 are amended; Section 11, Land, Paragraphs A 4 B; Section 1110 Term; Section IV, Pazmentst Rentals and Fees, Paragraphs A $ C; Section V110 Leasehold Improvements, Paragraph A, Subsec- tion 1; and Section XII, Insurance The amendments, referenced above, are as follows; 1. Section Il, Paragraph A, Land, is hereby amended to read as follows j F i a t 4 j IG SPj(y 1 lpv. w 1 one square foot, A one foot by one foot tract land, being shown E xhibit tie following hereto metes and attached drawn and outlined, as referenceEce, having ' 4 incorporated herein by bounds: 1 COMMENCING at the northwest deed cornertecoof conveyed to P. P. Breen by Texas o the cords o flying DnedtheeSouth right-of-way aline of PM Page Jnt said poi. Road 1515;s THENCE west along the south right-of-way line of FM Road 1515 a distance of 350 feet to a point; line of FM Road right-of-way west k' THENCE north along the , 1515 a distance of 1,000 feet to a point, line of THENCE west perpendicular to said right-of-way- PM 1515 a distance of 870 feet, more or less, to a point on the east edge of the pavement of the north taxiway; THENCE north 13° 50' 4111 west along the east edge of < pavement of said north taxiway a distance of 230 feet to . a point for a corner; 3 ar to 1 THENCE north 76 t a9'distlancey of 280 nfeet lto the spoint aof edge of pavemen beginning; THENCE north 130 50' 41ofe pavem0 feedistat of one parallel to said east edge foDt to a point for a corner; THENCE north 7bo 09' 1911 east perpendicular to said east edge of pavement a distance of one foot to a point for a corner; THENCE south 13° 50 41" east 281 feet east of and parallel tosaid foreast a edge f pavement a distance of one foot to a point ' THENCE south 76° 091 19" west perpendicular to said east squarefoot foot oof bland, more edge pavement talningn of one beginning and .on ` or less. said pro- Together with the rinkcommonnwiths othersgsossauthoroizee sonf and the right, enerally, subject i passage upon the Airport property 8 able regulations by the City of Denton; and such rights shall ; engers, patrons, and invitees. extend to Lessee s employeess pass j AGRRBMBNT FOR COMMERCIAL OPERATOR/FOX-51 LIMITED/PAGE 2 VIGC,tax 2. Section II, Paragraph B, Land-Property-B, is hereby amended to read as follows: B. Land - Property B; A tract of land consisting of 3.91 acres, or 170,583.34 square feet, as depicted on bxhi.bit B, attached hereto and iacor- porated herein for reference, and having the following metes and bounds; COMMENCING at the northwest corner of a tract of land as conveyed to P. F. Breen by deed recorded in Volume r 127, Page 185 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas said point lying in the South right-of-way line of FM Road ISIS; } THENCE west along the south right-of-way line of FM Road ISIS a distance of 350 feet to a point; THENCE north along the west right-of-way line of FM Road 1515 a distance of 1,000 feet to a-point; r THENCE west perpendicular to said right-of-way line of FM ISIS a distance of 870 feet, more or less, to a point on the east edge of the pavement of the north i taxiway; THENCE north 130 50' 41" west along the east edge of pavement of said north taxiway a distance of 230 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 760 09' 19" east perpendicular to said east edge of pavement of the north taxiway, a distance of 280 feet to a point for a corner; i THENCE north 1311 50' 41" west 280 feet east of and parallel to said east edge of pavement of the north taxiway, a distance of 220 feet to a point for a I corner; T"CNCE north 760 09' 19" east perpendicular to said east edge of pavement of the north taxiway, for a distance of 150 feet to the point of beginning; THENCE north 761 09' 19" east perpendicular to said east edge of pavement of the north taxiway, a distance of 279 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 190 07' 54" east for a distance of 336.84 feet to a point for a corner; I AGREEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL OPERATOR/POX-51 LIMITED/PAGE 3 1 A JAI YL%'Ay Av . ffypyNpls r~ {lAFpdS7!! i 21 ! THENCE south 540 09' 50.91' west for a distance of 280,57 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 760 09' 1.9" west aiwaydicau'distance aof i edge of pavement of the north Cxiway, 140 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 13° 50' 41" west 340 east of and parallel to said east edge of pavement of the north taxiway, a 5 distance of 220 feet to a point for a corner; i , west perpendicular to said j THENCE south 76° 09 19 distance of 59 j edge of pavele tfor ahe corner; north taxiway, a ; feet to a point ! ' 41" west 281 feet east of and f THENCE north 13° 50 parallel to said east edge of pavement forta corner; ) ` taxiway, a distance of one foot to a point THENCE north 760 09' 19" west perpendicular to said east edge of pavement of the north taxiway, a distance of one foot to a point for a corner; s and THENCE north lid east fledge eof pavementt ofastheofnorth l to sa paralle taxiway, a distance of 219 feet to a point for acorner; i THENCE north 76° 09' 19" east h taXIwaY' a distance ; perpendicular to said A east edge of pavement of the north and containing of 150 feet to the place of bemore ginning or less. 170,583.34 square feet of land, ;he Lessor, for and In consideration ofLessee) does nthereby agreements herein contained, to be kept by nd Less demise and lease unto Less scribed PraPertYoes fo rebyp ire anoE teen from Lessor the above t B is leased to (ltl) years commencing on the date. of execution of this Lease. is expressly understood and agreed that i ropeer~ y Said development Lessee for the puraose of development by four thousand shall be comprised of an area of at least thirty- ment'in seventy-one 734,071) square feet every year Ypetiiod{pay bepcarried - Upon commencement of two excess of 34,071 square feet in any B the date of final over into the following consecutive years). Lessor development of property within Property (f by approval of plans and the issuance of a building p of develop~rent), considered,as is deemed ean the dshallfimmediat iy t be said developaaen PrPe additions to Property A and siacluding5butenot tlimitedsto tland and conditions as Property per square foot, per year rental rates as computed on a cents, p basis; term of lease; consumer price adjustments, if any; and AGREEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL OPERATOR/POX-51 LIMITED/PAGE 4 } Yr:fPi+}(f} I l f I i date of commencement, as if said additions were and had been within Property A from the original date of execution of this i Lease. Should Lessee not develop at least thirty-four thousand seventy-one (34,071) square feet of Property B every two years, including any carry over from the previous year, the balance of the undeveloped property up to 340071 square feet shall, at the end of each two year period, automatically be considered as an addition to Property A as if said property had been developed. Property which Lessee and Lessor mutually agree is undevelopable may be removed from the above requirements at the end of the ten (10) yeah period. Lessee shall notify Lessor of its intent to develop pro- petty within Property B by written notice to the City Manager or his designee. such notice shall be delivered to the City Managec at least thirty (30) days prior to commencement of development and shall include, at a minimum, a drawing and description of,the size and location of the property and the type and number of improvements to be situated thereon. Construction plans and specifications shall be submitted to Lessor in accordance with Article VITI of this Lease. For the purposes of this Agreement, the term "Premises" shall mean all property located within the metes and bounds described above in Properties A & B, including leasehold improvements constructed by the Lessee, but not including certain easements or property owned and/nr controlled by the Lessor. 3. section TIT, TERM, is hereby amended to read as follows: III. TERM j The primary term cf this Agreement shall be for a period of I twenty-three (23) years, commencing on the lst day of March, t 1988, and continuing through the last day of February, 20120 unless earlier terminated under the provisions of the Agreement. ; Lessee shall have the first right to renegotiate this Lease i for two (2) additional five (5) year periods at the end of the primary term or any renewal thereof at a rental rate and terms to be mutually agreed upon by the parties without regard for or considering the, then present, cost of living index. if Lessee elects to renew this Lease, Lessee shall notify the City Manager, in writing, at least one hundred eighty (180) days before the expiration of the primary term or any renewal thereof. 4. Section IV, PAYMENTS RENTALS AND FEES, Paragraph A, Land Rental, is hereby amen a to read as follows; The land rental for Property A shall commence with the sum of seven cents ($0.07) per square foot, per year, payable in advance, AGREEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL OPERATOR/FOX-51 LIMITED/PAGE 5 , f. Al:iLr< j i (R!v.5t t11 ,r1 rte, Land rental shall be adjusted under the terms and conditions of this Lease as described herein. 5. section IVr Paragraph C, Payment, Penalty, Adjustments, is hereby amended to read as follows: Ij s c. Payment, Penalty, Adjustments: All payments due Lessor from Lessee shall be delivered to F the Airport Managerr unless otherwise` designated in writing by t the Lessor. Payments which are more than 15 days past due shall ; be assessed a penalty of one-half (1/2) of one percent per day, compounded daily, for each day or fraction thereof which the payment or fee is more than 15 days past due. The yearly rental for land and improvements herein leased shall be readjusted at the end of each five (5) year period during the term of this F Lease on the basis of the proportion that the then current United states Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumer (CPI-U) for Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, as compiled by the U.S. Dep rtment of j Labor, Bureau of Labor statistics bears to they 1998 i index which was (1967 = 100). The lan rents amount : is now based upon 07 070) cents per square foot, per yearn for the land herein leased. i The four (4) rental adjustments, if any, shall occur on the ' following dates: i" It 1993 1, 2003 1, 1998 1, 2008 ` 6. Section VIII, LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS, Paragraph A, Required imp rovements, Subsection 1, Time Lim Ls, is hereby amended to read as o ows: 1. Time Limits. Lessee agrees that it shall, within seven hundred twen0) calendar days from the date of this Agree- ( ment, submit to the Lessor, for approval, detailed plans and specifications for the initial proposed leasehold improvements. Lessor agrees that it shall either approve the plans and speci- fications as submitted, or transmit. proposed revisions to Lessee, within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt: of the plans and specifications from Lessee. In the event that Lessor requires revisions of the original plans and specifications, Lessee shall have forty-five (45) calendar days from the date of receipt of the proposed revisions to resubmit the plans and specifications for Lessor's approval; such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. construction shall commence within one hundred eighty (180) calendar days of Lessee's receipt of Lessor's final (180be days lgafter a hane one hundred shall for completion the plans slate and commencement of construction. AGREEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL OPERATOR/FOX-51 LIMITED/PAGE 6 1 YA. E 7. Section XI I, INSURANCE AND INDEMNITY, is hereby amended to read as follows; A. Required Insurance; Lessee, at its expense, shall maintain coat nuous y ;"I effect at all times during the term of j this agreement the foll_~wing insurance coverages: 1. Comprehensive general liability covering the leased premises, the Lessee or its company, its personnel, and its operations on the Airport. ' h 2. Aircraft liability to cover all flight operations of 1 Lessee. 3. Fire and extended coverage for replacement value for i all facilities used by the Lessee either as a part of this agreement or erected by the Lessee subse- quent to this agreement. 4. Liability insurance limits shall be In the following E minimum amounts Bodily Injury and Property Damage: 'I One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limits on a per occurrence basis, and provide forntanminas an imum 5. aAll dditional enamed shall of thirty (30) days written notice to the City prior to the effective date of any cancellation or lapse of such policy. 6. All policies must be approved by the Lessor. 7. The Lessor shall be provided with a copy of all such policies within thirty (30) days of the signing of this Agreement. During the original or extended term of this Lease, Lessor herein reserves the right to adjust or increase the liability insurance amounts required of the Lessee, and to require any addi- tional rider, provisions, or certificates of insurance, and Lessee hereby agrees to provide any such insurance requirements as may be required by Lessor; provided however, that any requirements shall be commensurate with Insurance requirements at otheriZe uhna' use airports similar to the Denton Municipal Airport, in s in scope of aviation activities, located in the southwestern region of the United States. Lessee herein agrees to comply with all increased or adjusted insurance requirements that may be AGREEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL OPERATOR/FOX-51 LIMITED/PAGE 7 ~'.A.' sts9Y:nra ' r''' fiGalms% I` r .3 and or eextended term s required by the Lessor throughout original of this Lease, including types of or limits of insurance, and to comply with said insurance requirements within sixty (60) days following the receipt of a notice in writing from Lessor stating the increased or adjusted insurance requirements. Lessee shall have the right to maintain in force both types of insurance and amounts of insurance which ' i exceed Lessor's minimum insurance requirements. In the event that State law shouli be amended to require additional types of insurance and/or insurance amounts which exceed those of like or similar public use airports in the southwestern region of the United States of America, then in such k event, Lessor shall have the right to require that Lessee maintain in force types of insurance and/or amount of insurance as specified by State law. Failure of Lessee to comply with the minimum specified amounts or types of insurance as required by Lessor -shall constitute Lessee's default of this Lease. 1 ' B. INDEMNITY; During all times that this lease is in effect, the parties agree that Lessee is and shall be deemed to be an independent contractor and operator and not an agent or employee of City with respect to its acts or omissions hereunder. For all the purposes hereunder, Lessee is and shall be deemed an independent contractor and it is mutually agreed that nothing contained herein shall be deemed or construed to constitute a partnership or joint venture between the parties hereto. Lessee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, employees, and representatives from and against all liability for any and all claims, suits, demands, and/or actions j arising from or based upon intentional or negligent acts or omissions on the part of Lessee, its agents, representatives, employees, members, patrons, vis.ttors, contractors and subcon- tractors (if any), and/or sublessees, which may arise out of or result from Lessee's occupancy or use of the premises and/or activities conducted in connection with or incidental to this Lease Agreement. Lessee shall also indemnify City against any and all mechanic's and materialmen's liens or any other types of liens imposed upon the premises demised hereunder arising as a result of Lessee's conduct or activity. This Indemnity Provision extends to any and all such claims, suits, demands, and/or actions regardless of the type of relief sought thereby, and whether such relief is in thr form of damages, judgments, and costs and reasonable attorney's fees and expenses, or any other legal or equitable form of remedy, This Indemnity Provision shall apply regardless of the nature of the Injury or harm alleged, whether for injury or death to persons or j AGREEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL OPERATOR/POX-S1 LIMITED/PAGE 8 S~.In Esc:r`-Ya rr~ alleged at common and whether such cclaims laims, or otherwise. 't'his property, damage law or statutory or constitutional ? ll apply whether the basis for the cla m, mni ttyprovision sha , atives=, o or action may be attributable represe Ind maa and/ or to any suit, dem nt nd, Lessee, ents, of its ag ontractors (if any), atrons, visitors, employed by one directly or indirectly 4 e pjoyees, he member,, Patrons and/or sublessees or to any any of them. rr liability for a j es no responsibility directly or Further, City assum events which are damaging defects or conditions whany injury, I harm, or any re+nise remises, ndirectlY attributable to damp remise i p Lessee may now exist or which may hereafter arise upon the expressly waived by Lessee and all such defects being Indemnity Provision shall aFP1Y 1 understands and agrees suitsthdemands, and/or actions based upon to any and all claims, claim asserted by or on behalf employees , or arising from any such atrons, visitors agents, or any of its stembers, P and/or sublessees. any contractors and subcontractors t00~ and agreed that the City shall I unders li$ence of Lessee, ts 9 the neg agrees It is expressly ible for further not be liable or raspons Lessee tions agents, s employees and customers. ~ ertai all times exerci~ESroeasonabe nsiblelEorrtheusafetyfOf that it shall members, ppatrons, the safety o£ and shall be solelY empl yees and/or sub-' i its agents, representatives, f visitors, c ontractors and subcontractors if any), . tyor the Lesspree ot oecr tlic otahoer and other persons as welr Pao ars f 1 supplies and equipment an~ the P witil all gpp laws, Lessee further aState tandcommunic oif pal safety 4 persons. provisions of Federal, regulations, and ordinances. each agree that the Lessee and nth' oticetof any such PROVIDED FURTHER, romps and timely way, directly or' the other party prompt give affects or might affect claim made or su i t inst or odhew wises any agrees that this indirectly, contingently or the e~~t City- Lessen further Lessee or th considered as an additional remedy the ision shall be ` Indemnity prov t to city and not an exclusive remedy, thi WITNESS WHEREOF the parts s have execu' 1 s Amendment e day of Agreement nt as of the CITY OF DENTON, LESSOR j 8Y' AGREEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL OPERATOR/POX-51 LIMITED/PAGE 9 4 ~Y1e ~ S IL4dxl++ Y wig= 1 ATTEST E ~ ~ r APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. ORAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY E, BY: I , j POX-51 LIMITED 1 4 I j ATTEST i ! j f i i j AGREEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL OPERATOR/FOXy51 LIMITED/PAGE 10 i 1 ~ THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON c Before me, the undersigned authority, in and for said county, Texas, on this date personally appeared F. D. Strickler, known to me to be the person and officer whose name is subcribed to the i foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that the same was the ? 1 ! act of the said Fox-51 Limited, a corporation of the State of Texas, II and that he executed the same as the act of said corporation for the h purposes and consideration therein expressed, and in the capacity i therein stated. Given under my hand and seal of office this 18th day of January, 1988. t t NOTARY PUBLIC, STP.TE OF TEXAS My Commission expirest 10/13/91 1 ff 4 1 r ,I i ,I AGREEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL OPERATOR/FOX-51 LIMITED/PAGE 11 P ATTACHMZ "A"i TO AIR?= LEM Alfl11D! j M , Ts'r 1 t ~ r a t pox J{ 3 a c~~ I N ScAl.S i too' EXHIBIT "Au E Ati'S5li7 1 nB'o~TO AIFPOC► ISM AID!' a ATUCMO= iiiiiiiiiiiiiiijill, t rwr 51 L y ~ i r ~ I p.`-t N~--- SCALE 19100 f ff EM1131T ngrr f 1 :IYY:l M1'! ,V fi 1'nll3lYfi"",g I Of 1JpdOC6ti IOXSt.pl6 i j 3 RESOLUTION NO. ? A RESOLUTION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR PROPERTY LEASED TO a FOX-51 LIMITED AT THE DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT? AND PROVIDING FOR f AN EFFECTIVE DATE. z C WHEREAS, the City of Denton has leased property to Fox-51 Limited at the Denton Municipal Airportp and ? i WHEREAS, the lease requires the City Council to approve any development plans prior to the Lessee beginning construction; NOW, s THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: s- 3 SECTZON I That the City Council has determined, as required by Section VIII of the Lease between the City of Denton and Fox-51' t Limited, that the plans for the improvements to be constructed on the Leased Premises by Lessor, shown in attached Exhibit A, are compatible with the overall size, shape, color, quality, design, i f appearance, and general plan for the program established by the City's master plan for the Airport, SECTION TI That this resolution shall beaomd effective immediately upon its passage and approval, PASSEL AND APPROVED this the day of 1991. { { BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR J ` e ATTEST: t JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY, APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY I ~,.,~--•,r". S K.'9:Stm.4YS4YGrt S P I r CITYCIPAL BUILDING ! DENTON, TEXAS of06NTON, TEXAS MUNf 7fi201 /O1floePolOthe City ~5ec eery E M 0 R A N D U M t TO nager : Lloyd V. Harrell, City Ma i I Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager FROM, DATE: June 27, 1991 f. i SUBJECT: Fox 51 Lease Amendment i, 51 lease at the Airport. Attached is the amendment to the Fox sting Y have also included a cleale of drawings which show exact j se in relation to the exi location of the new plan of the buildings is included. Also, a site 1. buildings. 0 build shell-type hangars s " . stand it. Pox 51 intends t I 'I As we under lease them out, The Alt , that could be finished out to suit 9800'e hangars. ultimate plan would include three r As we mentioned. this is an amendment to the existing lease. eatablished when the original lease a foot was the Council and Pox 51. The The price of 70 ` upon generate an additional feet by the and amendments were agreed additional 105.180 square $7,362.63 for us each year. expansion. The Airport Board was They approved the we are excited about Pox 51's also pleased to see this development. the Attorney's details by their meeting in 1 June concept plan pending and the amendment ron ofe a the final Office. Tf you or the council has any further questions, Y would be to try and answer them at your convenience. 6 happy 1 I R Sv Deputy city Manager RS:bw 5393M I Attachments ~I I AGAI'VO RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE AIRPORT COMMERCIAL OPERATOR LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND FOX-51 LIMITEDI AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, certain real property upon the Denton Municipal Air- Port was leased to FOX-51 Limited, a Texas partnership, by lease agreement dated April 1, 19861 and WHEREAS, the City and lessee amended the lease in 19881 and WHEREAS, the City of Denton and the lessee desire to further amend the lease agreement; and WHEREAS, the Airport Advisory Board for the City of Denton has recommended approval of the Second Amendment; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON.HEREBY RESOLVES: SECITON I. That the attached Second Amendmnnt to the airport commercial lease agreement between the City of Denton and Fox-51 Limited is approved. SECTION TI. That the Mayor is authorized to execute the at- tached lease amendment on behalf of the City and the City Secretary is directed to affix this resolution with the executed lease amend- ment to the original airport lease agreement dated April inscribing on the original agreement the fact It has been amended and the effective date of the amendment. SECTION 111. That this resolution shall become effective im- mediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1991, BOB CASTLEBERRYt MAYOR ATTESTt JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCHO CITY ATTORNEY BYt I r .Y`r hv,n. I i i i SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE COMMERCIAL OPERATOR LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND FOX--51 LIMITED ` This lease amendment is made this day of 19910 between the city of Denton, Texas, (Lessor) a municipal corporation and Fox-51 Limited (Lessee), a Texas corporation, 'i having its principal offices at Route 1, Box 102, Denton, Texas, f 76205. ~ RecitatR ~ ' Lessor owns and operates the Denton Municipal Airport (Airport) in the City of Denton, Texas. In 1986, Lessor leased land at the Airport to Lessee for the purposes of conducting a commercial busi- ness, in 1988, Lessor and Lessee agreed to the amendment to the lease (First Amendment). Lessor and Lessee now wish to make fur- ther amendments to the lease. 8grement In consideration of the that the following promises of each,. the parties agree.. 1986, as amended on January 29 1988he is f rther amended as followsi 1. Section II, s follows; -Premises, is hereby amended to read as j II. LFn.aED PREM;,~F,,; ~ li A. L=d - Property A: Lessor leases to Lessee the following tracts of land: ALL that tract or parcel of land lying in the T. Toby Sur- vey, Abstract Number 1285, city of Denton, Denton County, Texas, as shown in Exhibit A and described as follows: COMMENCING at the northwest corner of a tract of land as E conveyed to the Nobles Company by deed recorded in Vol- ume 2798, Page 695, Real Property Records of Denton County, Texas, said point lying in the south line of F.M. 15151 THENCE north 88. 33' 4311 west with the south line of said F.M. 1515 a distance of 265.14 feetp THENCE north 01' 50' 3911 went along and near a fence on the east line of Tom Cale Road a distance of 1000.00 feet; 1, eauu.v+ ~ j i THENCE south 88° 09' 21" west a distance of 902,71 feet to a corner on the east line an asphalt taxiway; THENCE north 12° 251 00" west with the east line of said taxiway a distance of 274.35 feet; THENCE I north 77 351 001+ east a distance of 280.00 feet to an iron pin at the point of beginning of the herein de- j scribed tract; THENCE north 124 25' 00" west a distance of 240.00 feet to a point for a corner; i THENCE north 77° 35' 00" east a distance of 427,15 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 174 42' 13" east a distance of 241.03 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 770 35' 00" west a distance of 449.36 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 105,180.55 square feet or 2.4146 acres of land. Together with the right of ingress and egress to the property, in common with others so authorized, of passage upon the Airport prop- erty generally, subject to reasonable regulations of Lessor. This i right shall extend to Lessee's employees, passengers, patrons, and invitees. B. LAIld - Property B: All that certain tract or parcel of land lying in the T. Toby Survey, Abstract Number 1285, City of Denton, Denton ' County, Texas, as shown in Exhibit A, and described as J followss i COMMENCING at the northwest corner of a tract of land as f conveyed to the Nobles company by deed recorded in Volume ' 2798, Page 695, Real Property Records, of Denton County, 1 Texas said point lying in th© south line of F,M. Road 1515; THENCE north 884 330 43" west with the south line of said F.M. Road 1515 a distance of 265.14 feet; ) THENCE north 016 50' 3910 we3t along and near a fence on the east line,of Tom Cole Road a distance of 1000.00 feet! THENCE south 88° 031 21" west a distance of 902.71 feet to a corner on the east line an asphalt taxiwayt THENCE north 12. 25' 00" west with the east line of said taxiway a distance of 274.35 feett page 2 i f 1 ;M .v 4~1MJ~i , x. area - THENCE north 77' 35' 00" east a distance of 340.00 feet to an iron pin at the point of beginning of the herein de- scribed tract; THENCE north 77' 35' 00" east a distance of 389.36 feet to a point for a corners r THENCE south 17' 42' 13" east a distance of 115.49 feet to a point for a corner; A' THENCE south 55' 35' 32" west a distance of 280.40 feet to ! an iron pin for a corner; THENCE south 77' 35' 00" west a distance of 140.00 feet to an iron pin for corner? r THENCE north 12' 25' 00" west a distance of 220.00 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 73,737,45 square feet or 1.6928 acres of land. C. Development of Tract B. i 1. Property B is leased to Lessee for the purpose of future development by Lessee. Upon commencement of development of i any property within Property B, the property shall on that date be considered to be an addition to Property A and be ' subject to the same terms and conditions as Property A, including but not limited to, the same rental rate and adjustments, if any, as if the added property had been with- in Property A from the original date of execution of this 4 Lease. The date of issuance of a building permit by Lessor ! for the improvements shall be considered the "commencement of development". i 2. If Lessee fails to commence development of at least thirty- % ' s?x thousand eight hundred sixty nine (36,869) square feet ; of Property B by January 1, 1996, that amount of property shall be automatically be considered as an addition to Property A on that date as if commencement of development had begun on that property. s 3. If Lessee fails to commence development of the remainder of the property within Property B by January 1, 1998, that property shall be automatically be considered as an addition to Property A on that date as if commencement of development had begun on that property, D. Premises Defined. For the purposes of this Agreement, the term "Premises"' shall mean all property located within the metes and bounds described above in Properties A and B, including leasehold - Page 3 J IeYU R*;tAJ improvements constructed by the Lessee, but not including certain easements or property owned or controlled by the Lessor. 2. Section IV, PAYMENTS;, TATS AND FEES, paragraph A, Land Ren- tal, is amended to read as follows: A. Long Rentgl: 1. The land rental for Property A shall begin at seven cents ($0.07) per square foot, per year, payable in twelve (12) equal monthly installments in advance, on or before the first day of each month. The rental shall be subject to the adjust- ments contained in this lease. { 3. Paragraphs A and B of Section VIII, amended to read as follows: hFASOLD IMPROVEMENTS are i A. Improvement Requirements. i In making any improvements on the Premises, Lessee shall comply with the fcllowing: 1. All requirements of the Lessor's Land Develop- ment Code, other than platting requirements, .J including but not limited to Lessor's Build- ing, Fire, Electrical, and Plumbing Codes, and other Codes and ordinances applicable to the improvements to be made, including the payment of any fees established by ordinance. 2. Prior to commencing development, Lessee shall obtain the City Council's determination that i the improvements conform to and are compatible with the overall size, shape, color, quality, design, appearance, and general plan of the program established by the Lessor's Master Plan for the Airport. 3. Any rules or regulations of the any Federal or State agency having jurisdiction thereof. I B. Time for Approval by Council. i The required determination by the City Council that the plans are compatible with the Master Plan for the Airport shall be made by tho Council within sixty (60) days of proper submission of the plans to Lessor. If the Council fails to act within the sixty (60) days, the plans shall be deemed approved for the purposes of the requirement of compatibility with the Master Plan, but shall not be deemed approved for any other requirment, including the requirement Page 4 7 1 i to comply with the Lessor's Land Development code and other Y applicable codes. a ~~T['N(r(ELsT__ is amended to read as follows: 4. Section IX, " IX. A°$iG.:wcum nR SUBL•EASE ` Lessee shall not assign this lease or sublet, assign, transfer, nor license all or part of the Leased Premises without the prior ; j written approval of Lessor. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 1 BY: ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY I~ i BYs I i APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY ~ r< r i l BYs r ~ FOX-51 LIMITED i` BYs t j E I ATTESTS 1 I ,t - BYs SECRETARY Page 5 i dk!WON f . s M ' j N L7 I ASPFIAL . .w 42T.1b ~ , t3' E s 1 N71- AT ' ~ art W .I ,R~w ~RAG~ MA# ' 2A 140 AG t*' v K OR g tOb.5b0.66 SO.fs. 444.38 1 Y-CK . 42' g TT 380.36 i ~RP~T •p ) A 5.6928 A ' • OR ! ~o dO' ` { 9O. A8 Fl, n+ ~i~5 13d3T ,~f o 9 1 4 ~ { ,,4sss w aa►ve ~ ASPNAtY ~ ' ra+a ro ._.rr,._.~.,.r .~......r. se c w too M i ; i M xnuawrs~ fin. .rq y f A'1 J ill°V'1' „A„ • City of Denton +municipal. Suilding Denton, Texas 76101 E. Division 3 Hangar is x Hangar Where No Repair Work As DOne• ' Requires The Vat of an open Flame, Welding or the use of Class 1. A Group Which 1 or 2 Liquidi,. ` 2. Exterior Walls of Group E Division 3 Hangers Which are Less Than 20' Prom a property , n8 Wells { Line .or,L Ths e20inRequicement Does nNatsApply To ur'Fira Euildi , $hall be Of Resiative Construction. Fronting on a Public Street. } ts•a Hangar Where the Use of on open Flame Welding H Division 5 Hangar S. A Group be Requiredv or Class i Or 2 Liquids May are p+htefi are Less Than 60' 4. Exterior Wells of Group H Division 5 Hang prom a Property Line or Lease Line Shall be of Kintmum 1-Hour Fire Resistive construction. Walls Fronting On a { The 60' Requirsa~ant Does Not Apply to Bullding ` public Streeto is Located on the Same Lot or Tract of Land• 6, Where More Than 1 building araWo a Property Line must be Between posed Construction o a FAj~stjve r#VOuld if the 37' + Separation Shown Remains, aion 1-Hour to be of MUMMU03 -Hour Fir* miinimuumiofd40' Separation Can1bee Provided SatVsenB-3 Hang tion parat ion Iquired. To 1-Hour ger r the miotumiSeparatio aWau dnbar80 ' Ss . Walls Would be Rin Ha a YP. between 2 H-5 Hangars Would be 120' in Order to Avoid 1-Hot►r ill Construction. 7, An Example of a'1-Hour Flra Resistive Wall Would be 1 Uyer of Firs Code Gypsum Board on Each Side of a Metal Stud Wall4 t a Parking era Would Psral 6. A Minimum Separation of 42 Sotwesre Hang Arragesent as Shown Z q ` . 1 raved Perking Space per 10000 Sq. Ft. of Floor Area to Rsqut"d for Each Hangar* ing where Parsons Ave Employed Shall be provided With At 10, Every build I Least 1 Water Closet. E of ll, geparata Facilities Shall be Provided for Each In Group4 pli,-Div r iuion `DiV Employees Bxeeeds 4 and gosh Sexes Are Employs ' Occupancies When Toilet FACilitiea Ave ProvidedAt Least 1 Such Facility Shall ?feet Design Requirements for the Physically Handicapp"' } S d P+I~1:Mirg r HA'"Sltil{rrp f ffe~{tlyfi 11 i ~ rFRit...lpl.~l 1. r. ~4,~.Mr s r1..PYr•W• 'N - M1, . 1 rH t .r ~A rA. G. ' i. Y i H.. i Ar .ti'/.µ i..ll k ' A,Z rw.. Rr•f i ll~y~y~ F. l i i • . ~l n ' A~ T 'a'wl. + Y• t. ; IA/ l';I~~~JPN t~,' •rr ~~t ri h 'l l J;.ri f R r ~ , .P Iw6.~w l A WW'.,tlrN rl. i .•r ...1 1 1 d. r , Yt t'. ti f~ 'l r ' ~1P t ~ 1 ~ .f+/µl r r~Y1~1 Ir Ir rl i ! hr. ~i'M.. + r1 i~d w+ h f d r: t ~ , , ti..y L, y , ;.~`hs { 'Not 124 'wl,andints'Shall .5* Provided At Each Exit When Finished 'Orade~isLlfoYre Than V.,8elow,the Poor Threshold in Group 8, Division 3.Occupanafis: ' } 190. LindinEe Shall Be Provided At Each Exit When Finished Crode`.ie:Mora 'Than, 1" 8elov the Door Threshold in Group H, Division 5,0eoupaaeiae. 14. Electrical Wiring Shall $e Installed in Accordance With Article'M ti ! of the National Electrical Code, 15, Floor Surfacea Shall Be Nonabsorbent. l 16. 'Septic Tank Permits Are Issued by Utility Department. Contact Olean Gary $66.7121. Mr, Gary Should Also Have Information About j Fire Flow I.*. Whether or Not There is AdAquate Water to Fight a Fire At This Site. f Frank Strickler Jukii>'Doyle ra':' r u Building OfficialY `~'.r`? i 1 w .1 pry.., ~ vt y •''h , . . • fPq 111 • ~ 1. ,L r' I :00 0. 1 eca~+:.n o i s r' ,yam MINUTES AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD JUNE 12, 1991 3 CHAIRMAN - RICK WOOLFOLK i THE CITY OF DENTON AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD MET FOR ITS REGULAR I , j MEETING ON JUNE 12r 1991, AT 5:30 P.M. IN THE CITY OF DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CONFERENCE ROOk, DENTON, TEXAS. G MEMBERS PRESENT: Jay Anderson, Rick Woolfolkr Allia Miller, E George Gilkeson, Nancy Hundley and Gene " Wright. MEMBERS ABSENT John Dulemba. i OTHERS PRESENT Rick Svehla, Deputy Uity Ma:a•.xgeri Joe Thompson, Airport Managerr and Celina Gonzalez, Airport Staff. t I. The Board considered the Minutes of the Regular Meating' of May 150 1991. Minutes approved as written. J II. Public Session 1 There were no items for discussion in the Public Session. f III. FOX-511 Ltd., Building Review s The Board reviewed a letter from Joe Thompson, Airport Manager, to Frank Str,ickler, FOX-510 confirming authorization to procveed wish the construction'of a security fence around the old north hangar pad site at Denton 1 Airport. Per discussion in the previous Board meeting concerning FOX-51's construction of three new hangars on Denton Airport, Joe Thompson stated that.a Legal Request has been i submitted to the City of Denton Legal Department requesting a resolution authorizing an amendment to FOX-51's Commercial ; Lease Agreement with the City for additional square footage ; per the survey of FOX-51's proposed building site. s I 1 t' Aj i f a:iifY~-~YJ DRAFT Airport Advisory Board June 12, 1991 Page 2 The Legal document and the site survoy were reviewed by the Board. In addition, the Board discussed the FOX-51 hangar building requirements as outlined by Jackie Doyle, City of Denton Building official. These hangar requirements were reviewed and approved by Frank Strickler, FOX-51 (see y attachment "A"). Rick Woolfolk, Board Chairman, pointed out that there has been some communication breakdown betweet, Frank Strickler and the DRC, which has lead to delays in expediting FOX-51's building projects. Mr. Woolfolk explained that Mr. Strickler has failed to attend DRC meetings to discuss the building projects. Mr. Woolfolk has suggested to Mr. Strickler that in order to prevent further delay, he should attend DRC meetings to answer any questions the City might have regarding FOX-51's proposed hangars. Additional information reviewed by the Board included an application i submitted by Joe Thompson to the City Economic Development Department requesting that the sewer lines at Denton Airport be extended to the north end of the Airport in order ,that existing buildings and new buildings be hooked into the sewer mains. Mr. Thompson asked Board Members to review e✓ POX-51'a Building Review and direct any questions or t suggestions to the Board Chairman or the Airport Manager. ! George Gilkeson made a motion to accept the amendment to ' ! FOX•5106 Commercial Lease for additional square footage I and to approve the location of the building according to the current site plan. Jay Anderson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Board will make a recommendation to the City Council to approve the building plans at the Airport Board/City Council meeting, tentatively scheduled for June 25, 1991. IV. Airport Master Flan Review Joe Thompson explained that he has received two acknowledgments regarding the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) letter recently mailed out to seven Master Planning Groups for an Airport Master Plan Update for Denton Municipal Airport. Mr. Thompson stated that the deadline for submittals is June 30, 1991. Following this deadline, C t IIIFFF I DRAFT Airport Advisory Board June 12, 1991 Page 3 the Airport Selection committee would meet to review the RFQ's and select.a Planning Group for the project. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, suggested that in the event that three or less Planning Groups submit RFQ's, that it would be in the best interest of the Board to dissolve the Selection Committee and invite the prospective Planning Groups to present their qualifications before the Airport Board. After brief discussion, the Board found Mr. Svehla's s recommendation acceptable. Mr. Thompson added that on j July 3, 1991, the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) will meet to review the Airport Pre-Applications that have been submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration. Mr. Thompson invited Board Members to attend. V. Airport Manager's Report a. Pre-application for Federal Assistance the Board reviewed a summary of the Pre-applications for Federal 'r•.~ Assistance per the 1985 Master Plan to be reviewed by NCTCOG` on -July 3, 1991. Following review, the NCTCOG will make recommendations to the F.A.A. b. ASOS Update - Mr. Thompson stated that on June 4, 1991, the tease Agreement was signed by the City Council for approval of the installation of the ASOS. Construction e j is tentatively scheduled for August, 1991, of June, 1991 Monthly Invoice - reviewed by the Soard as general information. d. April, 1991 Monthly Expenditures - reviewed by tha. Board as general information. I , e. Drainage Improvements - Mr. Thompson stated that the Infield Drainage project is currently in its final stages and is scheduled to be completed during the week of June 17, 1991. i f i • J 6p DRAFT E Airport Advisory Board June 12, 1991 l Page 4 The Board adjourned into Executive Session at 6:20 p.m. and reconvened in Open Session at 6:45 p.m. 't Rick Woolfolk informed the Board that the Airport Board/City Council Meeting is tentatively scheduled for June 25, 1991. The Deputy City Manager will be informing the Board on this issue. 1 The Board Chairmen added that there has been. no re-appointments to the Airport Board and that the present Y I", a Members continue to serve on the Board. Risk Sva stated j that according to the City Council, the Board Members are to serve on the Board until they are replaced or re-appointed. 1 ' t With no further business, the Board Meeting was adjourned_ I at 7200 p.m. 1 THE NEXT MEETING OF THE AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD IS SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY, JULY 10, 19911 AT 5:30 P.M. IN THE CITY OF DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CONFERENCE ROOM, DENTON, TEXAS. j 44# 1 k i 1 ``II f I i } i a t /^1 1 r EXIST ASPHALT dF11V~_ s i~ 4e / i ,-"6poses *z 0 j dr~of+osEO , !60005 Ql /,~o~A/ t° 4 f~c acJ ~ ~ 4 I core Avreadv Coyc. Ap~aJ 1 CO so 'ApcioN go' M 1 a' sBP Nar Exl. d'A.ph.It y 1 . l 1 ~ 'Te 8Ar Dilon f er 43v'H.a9a` •yw~ EXSST ,dlsPri.~LT '''xl.rr laPlA/._J+c3e SLHt~'', i S ~ / ~I~'~ EK~ST T~' "~j BI.oct / pA° l s _ _ . n.. r. v _ ,a ~n+. a. trM.+;:'L'01 #ldllk{cSL.ry.1Lx-1+~s4{}44'~' i l I i f METAL KALDW IAA j ! L_J UR1V~ ' ASpHA~ y 71 3d oo• E 27= 00 ~ Lt ~sM iLSO oo 10 0 M ,06 N tt a! Sift 260ywa lb 's rNO c I'vott 1r(A !0 ' awl 10~~ A Q ay y' G w S7 • P Sp"AL.S • ~ Z x -H 1 0! 1 M 307. i L i In i ; Apnnull~ yA. t r t giwpdo0W\ I•tr j I RESOLUTION NO. 1 A R:-,SOLUTION NOMINATING A MEMBER TO THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE DEN AREA -1-1 DISTRICT; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. . 0 the term of office of Olive Stephens, a member of i WHEREAS, ~ the Board of Managers of the Denco 9w1-1 District having expired; , and WHEREAS, Article 1432e, Section 5, V.A.C.S. provides that two j voting members of the Board of Managers of an Emergency Communica- tion Distrio.t shall be appointed jointly by all cities and towns y lying wholly or partly with the district; and I WHEREAS, the. City of Denton, Texas wishes to nominate a l member to said Board; NOW, THEREFORE,. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY RE80LVESI gDaLQN_I. That the City of Denton, Texas hereby nominates j as a member to the Board of Managers of the i Emergency Communication District of Denton County. That this resolution shall become effective im-' SECTION II. royal. mediately upon its passage and app PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of _ _-ter 1991. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR I , ATTEST: 7ENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: i APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: c. i z { DENCO AREA 9-1.1 DISTMC'I' 1660 S. Stemntarts Freeway Suite 295 Lowlsvillet Texas 75067 (214) 221-0911 (214) 420-0709 Fax i ` TOs Denton County Mayors FRAMs Mike Pedigo, Executive Director j l D,AXE: June 28, 1991 SuBJ$t;'t't Appointment to Denw Board of Manager 'rhe legislation creating the Denco Area 9.1.1 District requires the appointment Of two members 10 Its board of managers from the cities whhiat the district. The current term of Mayor Olive Stephens, City of Shady 4 ! Shores, expires on September 1, 1941. Members are eligible for reappointment. 11f The current members of the Hoard of Managers are as follows i Annoinled by TermFatGlC~t ~ ' ~ Board ember ' George R. (Randy) Corbir, Denton County Fire Departments 9/1/'91' Lewisville Fire Departmenu cities 9/1t'92 John McQrane City of Denton cities 9/1/91 Olive Stephens City of Shady Shorra county 911192 Jim Ferguson L ewwAlle i Vacant county 9/1182 Melvin Willis Advisory I Mayor Stephens has expressed a willingness to serve another two year term if appointed. At this point, wo are not aware of any other person seeking the position. Should you have a candidate, please notify the other cltles, rMe successful candidate must receive votes from the mafuthy (11) of the cities within Denton County. + The Deoco Area 9.1.1 DWrict asks that you place the appointment of a representative to Its board of { managers on yotar council agenda in July and send us a written notice of your choice. Thank you for your help in thL% matter and if the Dence Area 9.1.1 District can be of assistance in any way, please call us at (214) 2210911. t Al }v i,SB+~ Yn '@fJ w' IMIAu 1 CITY of oLNTONO Tff"S A4UNIC1PAL BUILDING / 2f5 E. McXlNNEY / DEN70N, TEXAS 76201 t MEMORANDUM i July 16, 1991 DATE: The Mayor and Members of City Council TO, FROM: John F. Mc Grano, Executive Director of Finance 1 SUBJECT: COUNCIL REQUEST FOR INFORMATION During the major issues discussions, Council had equested liing addit9~nal information. ached are copies a report Also employees that have left the City !'or higher paying jobs. included is a report on ambulance billings and collections.. If you have any questions or need any additional information ~please advise. T. I JFMcG:af Attachments I 5908F I s 8771566.8200 D/Pw METRO 434.2529 f t y t ID CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / T'ELE'PHONE {8171566.8200 M E M O R A N D U M . 0 v TO: Batty McKean, Executive Director " Municipal Services/Economic Development FROM: Thomas W. Klinck, Director t Personnel/Employee Relations , ~ DATE: July 16, 1991 SUBJECT: Exit Interview Reasons ; Per your request, attached is a 'Summary of Pay-Related Reasons for Leaving" as indicated by employees who have left the City of Denton during FY 1989/90 and up to date FY 1990/91. These are listed by job family, department, and j position. s Of 88 employees leaving the City of Denton in FY 1989/90, 318 stated `Better Position" as the main reason for leaving. Of those employees, 521 ; i specifically stated low salary along with a better position. 'Moving" was the second most common reason for leaving at 14t, and 'Personal Reasons' ranked ) third at 134. of all the job families, the Professional family most commonly stated 'Better Position' as the reason for leaving. ill So far FY 1990/91 reflects that out of 58 exiting employees 26% have left for 111 a "Better Position'. Of that percentage, 271 specifically included low salary. The second most common reason for leaving was a tie of `Personal t Reasons" and "Terminated', both at 161" Retirement was the third most common 1 1i reason for leaving at 141. Although seen throughout the various job families, 'Better Position" is most commonly seen in the Professional job family, and in the Technical/Paraprofessional job family - specifically the position of Lineman in Utilities/Electric Distribution. i The most common reason for leaving the city of Denton in both years, is for a 1 'Better Position', with a high percentage ranking low salary specifically. if S can provide you further information, please let me know. } i i 3 Thomas W. K inck c 6219P 071691x0830 { r f T k IdFW.Y:.pl Iy ' 11~-~it4.f N 1 1 ' 6:QRJi5('j I SUMMARY OF PAY-RELATED I REASONS FOR LEAVING FY 1989-1990 JOB FAMILY DEPARTMENT POSITION REASON FOR LEAVING Management Finance Risk Manager Better position w ' Management Finance Treasurer Better position Office/Clerical Finance Cashier New position elsewhere Office/clerical Library Library Page Better position, low pay Office/Clerical Library Library Page Pursue own business interest, more money Office/Clerical Parks Secretary Better position, more pay Police Polica Officer Position in another city Police Police Officer Better opportunity with another agency Professional M3/ED Administra. Better position, low Assistant salary Professional CM0 Administra. Better position Assistant E Professional Utilities Engineer Better position 4 Associate Z i, Professional Utilitieu Financial Better position, low RRR Analyst salary Professional Planning Planning Adm. Better position with private firm ; Professional Parks Recreation Better position, more s Specialist I money Professional Parke Recreation Better position, low Specialist I salary Professional Parks Recreation Better position , Specialist i Professional Parks Recreation Low salary Specialist I Professional Parks Recreation Better position, low ; Specialist I salary Professional Parks Recreation Better position, salary Specialist I low Professional Parks Recreation Better position, low specialist I salary Professional Finance Sr. Accountant Better position, low salary Professional Planning Urban Planner Better position Serv./Maint. Comm. Svcs Commercial Better position Driven Serv./Maint. Comm, Svcs Residential Better position Driver Serv,Maint. Utilities Maintenance Better position Mechanic Teoh./Pare-Prof. Parka Peoreation Ldr. Accepted new employment Tech./Para-Prof, Parks Recreation Ldr. Better position, low salary Tech,/Paia-Prof. Utilities Shift Opr. Ap- Better position, pay low prentice { Tech./Para-Prof. Eng/Trans. Engineer Better position, pay Iow Technician II ! S i SUb;,dARY OF PAY-RELATED REASONS FOR LEAVING FY 1990-1991 Y; JOB FAMILY DEPARTMENT POSITION REASON FOR LEAVING Office/Clerical MS/ED Administra. Better position Secretary r Office/Clerical Finance Municipal Court Better position, salary Clerk low Office/Clerical Finance Municipal Ct. Better position in Senior Asst, another city Office/Clerical Finance Secretary Better position j Police Police Officer Better paying position Professional Utilities Administra. Promotional Opportunity SArV,Coord, in another city Professional Finance Budget Analyst Employment opportunity in another city Professional Finance Controllir Higher Position in f, Serv./Maint. Eng/Trana, another city HeaVy Equip. Better position Operator j Serv,/Maint, Utilities Light Equip. Pay not adequate Operator Tech,/Para-Prof, Utilities Lineman Better pay & benofits with another co. Teob./Para-Prof Utilities Lineman More Pay and better benefits Tech./Para-Prof. Uttlities Lineman Better position Tech./Para-Prof. Eng/Trans. Sr. Engineer. Better Position in Tech GIS another city r 6154P 07169110455 i 1 1 I 4O.W] CITY of OlrNTON, TriXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E, McXINNEY- / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 ti MEMORANDUM T0: John McGraoe, Executive Director of Finance FROM: Kathy DuBose, Controller DATE: July 15, 1991 H SUBJECT: AMBULANCE BILLING COLLECTION p' In response to a request made by John Trent, 1 have analyzed the City's have led collection mbinathe billings service land numerous cities collection. (See attached survey) In October, 1990 the City of Denton increased the basic ambulance service fee from $100 to $120 per call, The collection rate of fees billed for the 90-91 f fiscal year through June 30, 1991 is 33% with a cumulative, 3-year average of 46%6 Several factors play key roles in the current year's rate. First, almost } one half of all ambulance charges are submitted to Medicare for payment. Medicare pays only an amount equal to an average charge based on customary or icre (approximately prevailing charges within the saw locality also Ximatel requires $65 of a one year I for the 90-91 fiscal year). Second, d a percentage re of of that our increased fee to determine if it will accept and pay any p ge increase. Third, he City amount not pa, df by Medicare is billed to Medicaid, if oapplicable billings. Any or the individual. Finally, the City is in the process of replacing the collection agency under contract to collect unpaid ambulance services fees. Several months have lapsed without an active collection agency after Credicom f filed bankruptcy. reducing fees. Of billing ambulance on l Medicare inhouse for 14 local 10caccept p assignment billed those to the amount Medicare approves. 1Me roves. Their respective collection percentages will not be II comparable to Dentons due to the assignment acceptance. I estimate an additional $16,000 annually is collected by Denton due to nonacceptance. i If you have any questions, please let me know. 6902F KD:Ib I i 8171566.8200 D/r"W METRO 434,2529 . 5 ti SURVEY CITY OPERATED AMBULANCE SERVICE JULY, 1991 ACCEPT .}AEC?ICARE BA>31C.. CURRI*T t'Y , CITY f5S1(Nf+AENT. ; ;.<i " . COL1 r=CT10NS" ; c: > s Denton No $120 33%: Lewisville yes $ 90 30% The Wony yes $100 NIA ; Farmers Branch Yes $ 65 NM Addison No $100 66% Irving yes $175 60% t x Garland yes $160 NIA Richardson Yes $ 76 60% Plano Yea $160 8096 r MdOnney Yes $100 NIA Sherman Yes $ 96 80% Dennison No $65-$95 60% ; s Dail" Yee $120 30% r Grand Pratte yes $330 N/A Carrdton " Yes $100 i b% t r (NIA • Not available) f " Signed contract for outside billing effective 07-01-91 July 1, 1991 senator Steve Carriker u P. 0. Box 517 Roby, TeXaS 79543 Dear senator Carriker: per your recent conversation with our Chamber President, Chuck Carpenter, this letter is to formally invite you to come to Denton on Thursday, September 26, for a special orientation. redistricting 1 We are excited about the current pand wel - that our senatorial district, opportunity to will place our city within Y ~ appreciate the Denton Chamber of Commerce - would tour and public :)n, local host and honor you with a V.1-P. lunch}fir, details in accrdance i; reception. We will work out the sp your part icular interests and schedule, but approximately with ximately ' t request that you please make plans to be in ~entott by s 12 can and remain through 7 P.M. that evening. ; be happy to make arrangements for E in addition, we will lease advise us of your needs. We look overnight accommodations; p forward to your visit on September 26. I Respectfully, e JDianne Edmondson, Chairman E Barbara Russell State Relations Committee 3 Chairman of the Board I 1 , DENTO • CHAMBER OF Cc?MMERCE Aacapo~Y~o 414 PARKWAY P. 0. DRAWER P DENTON, TEXAS 76202.1719 TELEPHONE 817.382.9693 w 1 AM'AZ t P.O. Boy 52M !"T d Am n. 70 11 0190 FAX'. .51?14650155 C HAI RMAN AGRICULTURE Sutcontn"nb Gu, , ELECTIONS 6 ETHICS Suboommmee F 1 MEUSER } Economic Nvowent Comm"'" ~~tl i HM "m Resou'ae Como' " Slats ANAIM C"m" 7 t~,umnc6su Subcornmitlee ~ Legklitiva D'str$M9bcts Smb of `(##e of C`ex ~ ~tef~ett (I~~trxiksr 19 Ssnate UsUk1 30 ArcSm ' i cis Jay 3, 1991 cnna~ JUL 5 1081 000" IWO) 1 Ft Floyd D"nton Q anber Of C ry a w P.). Rawer P VAfdW"&M D~a tcm, Twmg 76202 Ha" 1 u~ ~n~n; F, ! Dear Ms. Russell and Ms. d the day in Denton KWA mit-so I'm verb honored to be invited to s for this el zal Off MY cal~endar M & on September 26• I have marked icatin5 between r"w and then 'ff Stutn day in Denton. We will be 1 sto rew about de':ai.ls . ~ ! the OMA{nq special session, WcbU wwfect If you should be in Austin during vovv ply kttop by my office for a visit. Sin ely, C t Steven A. Carr er State Senator SACAS 1 .922E COVOWA 61 ! Gau+ysv~im, t%7624 1401 HOMOY 51 Su~le 4C6 a y'*6"53' wlchlta Ftllar lX 7GA11 4'AX. I BtT1665656- P.O.OOK $17 6177322•M~ I Roby. Tubs 19549 FAX1617R68tl59 ! 916R7633i-0 FA%.915'ii5~5f6 pMIMOr1ReCS'ejod PAgt .