Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-20-1991 4 1 tY}. ~9 t i i t 1 AGENDA CITY OF DEN ON CITY COUNCIL August 20, 1991 1 ~I Council on Tuesday, of Denton City City Work Session or~ the City P.M. in the Civil Defense Room of August 20, 1991- at 5.15 F Hall, 215 R, McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the follaw•.ng items will be considered: 5:15 P.M. it tom listed on the Agenda for the Work 8essior4 tMay he Note Any i art of the Agenda for also be considered as P ; 1 Regular Meeting. Executive Session: t 6252-17 Legal Matters Under sec. 2(e), Ar. V.A.T.S in Martin v. A. 1. Discuss Contention of Judgment, Ci of D litigation against the State of 2 ; . Consider Texas regarding redistricting. Real Estate Under Sao. 2(f), Art. 8252-17 V.A,T.S. nder sea. 2(g)' personnel/Board Appointments U C, Art 8252--17 V.A.T.S, Consider appoLcitment of alternates to the L' Sign Board of Appeals. the zoning Task Consider apFo'•,ntmtnts to g. Force. Hold a discussion and identify potential 1991•-92 2' budget additions or reduct.ione for further analysis. e staff Receive a report, hold t~ discussion and p®paive staff 3. direction regarding the utility application' of an ApE'A at~ea scha.laraof North TaXas, sponsorship for Claudia Heinrich of the University , hold a discussion and give staff Receive a report the utility Department's 9' direction regarding 1lcation for Dr. rant app M sponsorship f and Anr P. Aee D grant of Texas A & A. l University. l} Regular Meeting of the ~.Jty of Denton City Council on Tuesday, L s Of city August 200 whi hathex following 19910 at 7;U0 P'ton~nTexasCatnc i hall. 215 E, McKinney, Den i item; will be considered; i S , 1 1$ ft i f City of Denton City Council Agenda August 20, 1991 Page 2 i E i 7:00 p.m. i t 1. Pledge of Allegiance i 2. Consider a .t ~ pproval of the minutes of the regular , meeting of July 16, 1991. r 3. Presentation of Yard of the Month/Xeriscape Yards Awards from the Beautification commission and the Texas Agricultural Extension service-Denton county, s 4. Citizen Reports A. Receive a citizen report from Carl Young regarding problems with Fred Moore Park and problems within the neighborhood, B. Receive an update from Tom Harpool and Ray Stephens regarding TMPA matters. 5. Public Hearings f.: A. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance rezoning a ,41.3 acre tract of land from 112F" Two Family District to 'IPD" Planned Development District and approve a detailed plan on property located on the east side of Carroll Boulevard between Maple and Pacific Streets for the purpose of a professional office building. Z-91-011, (The Planning and Zoning commission t recommended approval 7-0 at its July 24, 1991 meeting,) B. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance amending the boundaries of the oast/Hick(ey Historic District to include three properties adjacent to the district: 305 Mounts, 311 Mounts, and 403 Mounts Street. H-91.002 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended f approval 7-0 at its July 25, 1991 meeting.) i 6. Consent Agenda Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff { recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. I r 4 i rj ~j City of Denton City Council Agenda August 20, 1991 Page 3 Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 7.A, 7.B). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance. y A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 3 14 1. Bid 01255 - Hydraulic Tools and Accessories 2. Bid #1274 - 500 MCM Unishield and #2 € Concentric 3 Phase Cable 3. Bid 01273 - Commercial Refuse Trucks 4, Bid #1268 oils and Greases d 5. Bid #1267 Loma Del Hey Drainage i B. Plats i 1. Consideration of the preliminary plat of Lot 1, Block A of the City Booster Pump Addition. The 15.951 acre site is located i on the north side of Hartlee Field Road, approximately one-half mile east' of Sherman Drive. (The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval at their 8/14/91 meeting). 7. ordinances A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. (5.A.k. - Bid #1255, 5.A.2. - Bid #1274, 5.A.3. Bid #1273, 5.A.4. - Bid #1268) } B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. (5.A.5. - Bid 01268) } C. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving the 1991 certified appraisal roll. D. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving no parking on the north side of Edwards street from Avenue D to Avenue E. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends approval.) i i 4i .b . ti q T 1? City of Denton City Council Agenda August 20, 1991 Page 4 E. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving no parking on the north side of Chestnut Street from Avenue D to Avenue E. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends approval.) F. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending Y Section 18-152 of the code of nrdinances of the City of Denton to include additional portions of City streets adjacent to property controlled by e the University of North Texas to be subject to the authority of the University for regulation of parking. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends approval.) 0. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an amendment to an agreement between the City of Denton and the Greater Denton Arts Council. E 8. Resolutions { A. Consider approval of a resolution appointing Ray Stephens to the Board of Directors of the Texas Municipal Power Agency. B. Consider approval of a resolution approving the . 1991-92 fiscal year budget of the Denton County Emergency Communications Diatrict, pursuant to i Article 1432e V.A.T.S. C. Consider approval of a resolution r,3guesting that municipalities be allowed to regulate possession of open alcoholic beverage containers within certain designated areas of the municipality. D. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing Amendment No. 2 to the Airport Commercial operator Lease Agreement between the City of Denton and Fox-61 Limited, (The Airport Advisory 'Board recommends approval.) E. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement between the City of Denton, Texas, and the Department of the Army. Corps of Engineers, establishing procedures i for hydropower operations at Lewisville Dam. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) F. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement between the City of Denton, Texas. and the Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, establishing procedures for hydropower operations at Lake Ray Roberts Dam. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) 1u.i i# it t ' i p City of Denton City Council. Agenda August 20, 1991 Page 5 9. submission of the effective tax rate and rollback tax rate. 10. submission of the certified collection rate. 11. Consider authorizing the submittal of a grant proposal to the Texas Department of Health for the Municipal Solid Waste Comporting Demoast:ration Grant. E 12. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. A. Receipt of tho nine-mouth City Financial Report I 1'3. Official Action on rNxecut.lve Session Items: l A. Legal Matters 1 B. Real Estate C. Personnel I D. Board Appointments s New Business: 14. W.s item provides a section for Counci), Members to P suggest items for futures agendas. l I.S. Exeoutive session; A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec, 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Udder Sec. 2(g), Art 6252--17 V.A.T.S. NOTE: THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT IS LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE. C E R T I F I C A T E I cortify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of _ 1991 at - o'clock (a.m.) (p.M.) ! CITY SECRETARY 3427C 4 1 . kj k August 20, 1991 l CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM t i t TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CI'T'Y COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager RE: CONSIDER THE UTILITY DE,PAR'IMM 'S SPONSORSHIP OF AN APPA DEED SCHOLARSHIP APPLICATION FOR CLAUDIA HEINRICH OF -HE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TKXAS. z RECOI4KENDATION: :"he Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of August 14, 1991, recommended to the city council approval of the submission of a DEED scholarship application for Claudia Heinrich of tl•ke University of North Texas. SUMMARY/BA,,RGROUND: As a member of APPA's DLED program, Denton Municipal f Utilities is eligible to submit and sponsor scholarship for students working on projects that, have implications for public utilities. Scholarships are intended to increase awareness of career opportunities in public assistance. Undergraduate and graduate students working in four-year colleges and universities are eligible for scholarships. Normally, up to ten i scholarships are available each year. Scholarships are, limited to $3000 per project. Funds are paid to the host utility for disbursement to the student. one-third of the funds ($1000) are withheld until satisfactory completion of the project and the submission of a final report. Claudia Heinrich, a native of Germany, is a student in the University of North Texas' Industrial Technology Department. Hera area of specialization is in electronics. She is currently working for us as an intern in the areas of energy management, electronics, { and communication. She works with Dr. Perry McNeill, Director of UNT's Electronics and Nuclear Technology program. The project for Ms. Heinrich's scholarship involves research and development of a submicron j pyramid antenna which would convert solar energy directly to electrical energy. This process would be, theoretically, more than four times more efficient than solar cell technologies. T1.1s is important research in the area of renewable onergy and has obvious implications for generating electrical utilities. i I I 3 k CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM PAGE Z i j PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT, OR GROUPS AFFECTEDz f Public Utilities SOard, Utility Department, University of North Texas Department of Industrial Technology. 1 FISCAL IMPACT: This project does wet would the used of Utility with the department funds. distribution of funds to Ms. Heinrich and monitoring t her progress. Respec ully submitted, C yd V. Harr.11, C t Manager t Prepared bys Ria and Foster, Pu 1 c Information Coordinator Approved b .E. LNels Executive Director of Utilities A:\DEED j I .I j ME ME 1 Ss August 20, 1991 i CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM I TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL City Manager 11 FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, EN'r %S S"SORSHIP OF UTILITY DEP .100 siT RE, CONSIDER THE IAPPI,ICATION pOR DR. PARtAS AN APPA DEO GRANT A&M UNYVERSITX• AND DR. A.D. PATTON OF TEXAS RECOt*UMATION at their meeting of August The Public recommendedoto the City Council approval of i EED grant application for Drs• 14 , 1991 D the submssion of a A.G. Par los and A.D. Patton of Texas A«M UniversitY• SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: ' of APPA's DEED programs Denton municipal As a member submit and sponsor grant Utilities is eligible to submit are intended for applications. DEED g mprove demonstration or early commercialization projects DEED member utilities which promise either tof enexgY sed efficiencies or lower costs in the provision . be used services to customers. These grants trat alsiso be u proj for applied research for early- services to With long-term potential either to improve e£ficier,cies 3 or lower costs in the pawardsoarefMader&t least twice customers DEED 5 Grant awardees are annually by DEED'Directors. progress reports. Funds expected to submit it quarterly are paid to the span invoiceility for disbursement to the project team basis. The grant application for Drs. Parlos and Patton i recastings $50,000. Their project is title "Long- Neural Methods for 'Electric Utilities Using a Approach." This project will be Information PTexas s A&M University by Dr. A G~ Parlos of performed a Department and Dr. A.D. Patton the Nuclear Engineering of the Elec rical Engineering Department. roject is to improve utilities' The purpose of this p by applying the Promising long-term capabilities systems ( natiarchiteeturesgbased on technology of Neural Info~ NIPS). Computer prograM g approaches used NIPS emulate the information processing in living biological systems, ewhich xample1lwith minimal system to learn complex tasks by 1 ~ VA, p1 i i 3 external intervention. The project directors propose to develop customized demonstration software based on this technology for eventual transfer to the electric utility industry. Preliminary results indicate that at least a 10-15% improvement in forecasting accuracy j could be achieved over existing methods. With the billion of dollars necessary to add new generation capacity, industry-wide, even a few percent improvement in forecasting could result in major savings. The NIPS technology is expected to set new standards for long-term planning in the electric utility industry. PROGRAMS# DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: k Public Utilities Board, Utility Department, Texas A&M University's Department of Nuclear and Electrical Engineering. FXSCAL IMPACT: This project does not involve the use of utility department funds. We would be involved with the t periodic distribution of funds to the grant awardees and monitoring their progress. Respee ally submitted, Llo d V. Harrell$ City M ager Prepared by: R c and Foster, Public Information Coordinator Approved by: R.E. Nelson, Execut ve Director of Utilities { f i i t .kikia>q;~j, =t r CITY COUNCIL MINUTES CITY OF DENJuly 16, 1991 The Council convened into the Work Session at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room. Council Mayor Castleberry; Mayor pro Tem Hopkins: PRESENT: Members Chew perry. smith and Trent. t AASENT: Council Member Alexander ' The Council convened into the Exeoung Bassion to } the claim of 1. ointments discuss legal matters (considered action re of dinDenton Boar do, real estate, and personnel/boar app Of } Michael Wilso~pgointments to all city Commissions and Task Foraes)• ort and held a discussion 2• The council received a rep } retral Appraisal 'District's garding a review of the Denton Cen { budget. year the er, r council stated that last aisal District's budget ~I tTaclan Jefferson, Treasur Y had disapproved the Denton Central dI over the previous Year'?, because it significantly i a.63 increase. The 1992 proposed budget had an budget, increase were different from thajusrevi tmen'cs. reasons he for the s due to salary the ear L due This• years the ear inc the rease isncereearsee cha wanges to included ed a mandated new r by 'cthe State Legislature. These and a change an agent of recoed form roeess. management act. the appraisal hearing P availability of records during allocation to the District dirACtionnfromgCounoil The City's staff was needing X1601200 to $68,467. Staff budget - whether to present h eaCitY's on how to approach ublia hearing, ;o formally diove no aan regarding approval or concerns at the a cc mitaka tio the budget Proposed budget. disapproval of the raisers the i council Member Trent asked about the number of app District had lc ees, Jefferson stated that the District had 471eoes of property each Council Member Trent asked h ~aanY P appraiser had to handle each Year. Executive Director for Finance, stated that there John Mnprane, were 13 appraisers for the entice Countuestions it wished to be ! Jefferson ask he uprominglpubhad lic ahearing• raised during I`A 1 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 16, 1991 Page 2 Council Member Perry asked if this was a reasonable budget. Mccrane replied that staff could do some type of comparisons with different appraisal districts. Consensus of the Council was to not approve or disapprove the budget. The City would not make any comments regarding the s budget. 3. The Council received comments and gave further directions regarding the Major Budget Issues Report. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that there were two questions raised during the presentation of the Mayor Budget Issues Report. Staff had responded to those questions regarding the percentage of ambulance billing and exit interview reasons. He asked Council if they had additional questions or information they needed before the start of the budget process. Council Member Perry asked for a survey of cities the same size of Denton regarding what they did for human services in terms of ways and means as well as dollars. The council reconvened into the Executive session. The Council convened into the Regular session at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers. PRESENT, Mayor Castleberry; Council Members Chew. Perry, Smith and Trent. } ABSENT; Mayor Pro Tom Hopkins; Council Member Alexander 1. Pledge of Allegiance The Council and members of the audience recited the Pledge of Allegiance. Mayor Pro Tom Hopkins joined the meeting. 2. The Council considered approval of the minutes of the Special Call meeting of June 25, 1991 and the Regular Meeting of July 2. 1991. Trent motioned, Perry seconded to approve the Minutes as presented. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins ",aye,,, Smith "aye," Chew "aye," Perry "aye, 11 and Mayor Castleberry "aye.° Motion carried unanimously, i fI t City of Denton City Council Minutes July 16, 1991 Page 3 r 3. The Council received i report from Dianne Edmondson representing the State Relations Committee - Denton Chamber of Commerce, Ms. Edmondson stated that her remarks would be regarding the E redistricting issue, July 15 was the deadline for accepting - y t the new census figures. Those figures were not accepted by the United States Secretary of Commerce, The Attorney General for the State of Texas was planning on filing a lawsuit over the E issues. T'Aere were a I pproximately 30 other ',awsuitswhich would , also be filed regarding this issue. The f cures had never boon changed and the chances of having the figu.-e changed this year were remote. if the law suit was successful a special session would be required of the Legislature to deal with redistricting. In 1992, the City of Denton would have new representation as the City had been divided among three different districts. The Chamber of Commerce felt it was time to try and make the best of the situation. The State Government Relations Committee had a plan which had been approved by the Board of Directors to help make Denton an 3 important part of each district. September 26, 1991 had been ' designate6 as Senator stove carriker Day, She asked the Council to approve a proclamation for that day to demonstrate how important he was to Denton.; 4. Protjentation of Yard of the Month Awards. Mayor Castleberry presented the Yard of th6 Month Awards to Mr. and Mrs, Beverly A. Peel, Ray and Trudy Cryder, Harold and Peggy Duncan, and HCA Denton Community Hospital. I 5, Public Hearing's d A. The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance amending a Detailed Plan on a portion of Planned Development No. S for, the purpose of reconfiguring the building footprint and reducing the overall gross square footage of the buildings on property located on the northeast corner of N. Elm (Highway 77) and Fallmeadow, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-0 at Its June 12, 1991 meeting.). Z-91-006 f The Mayor opened the public hearing, Josh Joserand, representing the owner, stated that they were requesting zoning for a convenience store on the property. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. { i Lt tR p3 t City of Denton City Council Minutes July 16, 1991 Pale 4 Karen Feshar.i, Urban Planner, stated that this was a request to amend a portion of Planned Development No. 8 Detailed Plan for s the purpose of reconfiguring the layout of the plan in order to allow for a convenience store witty gasoline pumps. The property was located in a low intensity area. At the time of platting, sidewalks would be required along the frontages of F Fallmeadow and North Elm. An executed and recorded declaration of restriction would be required for shared parking prior to an issuance of a building permit. The applicant was requesting a change of the building footprint from one building to two separate buildings reducing the square footage. The reduction of the square footage would also reduce the allocation of intensity trips. In addition, the amended site plan reflected a reduction of height of the buildings. The following ordinance was considered: F NO, 91-100 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING THE DETAILED PLAN APPROVED BY ORDINANCE NO. 86-121 FOR A PORTION OF' PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. Be LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF U.S. HIGHWAY 77 AND FALLMEADOW STREET; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Perry motioned, Chow seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins "aye," Smith "aye," Chew "aye," Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. f t A. The Council held a public hearing and considered approval of a resolution amending the Denton Development Plan Concept Map by extending the northwest urban center south along Interstate 35N (The Planning and zoning Commission recommended approval 5--0 at its June 12, 1991 meeting), Karen Feshart, Urban Planner, stated that the request amended the intensity area of the Denton Development Plan from low intensity to the urban center on 76.37 acres. in conjunction with the resolution was an ordinance rezoning 245.8 acres from the Agricultural District to Planned Development District and approval of a development plan for the purpose of a mixed use development consisting of office, retail, commercial, manufacturing, and institutional uses. The development was located at the intersection of IH-35 and Loop 288. The connection of the development to Bonnie brae to provide access to northwest Denton was a key design element that would be correctly staged to limit impacts on the exiRting Westgate {4 neighborhood. The utilities were generally accepted but would E ~ 1 1i P:1• ! F{ $,1 1 ' ii city of Denton city council minutes July 16, 1991 Page 5 at great length at the time of the detailed plan for draie be analyzed stage. The development would also onc©rnsthwouldd b0 addTheraesnsed was improvements. Off-site drainage With off-site improvements or on-sito retention. tion areas, caparities, and concern with drainage to the south and to the north n platting 77, The exact location of the deten area would be defined at the detailed plan sthern The Westgate neighborhood had toques Thisthe sout 1 ponde8be designed as a retention facility, reque to ban ce not a the ter wod center havewas Increase the boundaries ohe afety of the act Co t alth,urwelfare and s 1 the Penton i negativs imp The Zoning in the northern urban r community. olicies of consistent with the balance hegstaffIs p concerns Thee apresolved plicant Development plan. and Zoning Commission meeting. at the Panning es to had made appropriate chanommissi ne sect Main issuese considered the Planning and Zoning C were intonsity and zoning Commission meeting existing and at the Planning compatibility ` i boundary modifications, uses on the east and south sides of edestriasi access E plahenneprd/zoned developm tnt• alternative ea p developer had agreed to condition, and 1-35 seCDacks. The the Westgate heiht along erect a brick wall, six feet Trie il~ondition whi h the Planning Addition property boundary, ublic hearing be and zoning Commission recommenl n etagehafor any part of the conducted at the detailed plan the Legal Department However, upon k development, requirement may not be legal and then believed that this certain stagDffoorrrtert, detailed plan himself applicant had imposed condition public hearing during table by the Legal uses, This was considered acceptable The mayor opened the public hearing. Don Dillard, Rancho Vista Development company, stated that they ~ closely with staff, the Development } ` had been working very Review committee. a work session with Thhe devPlanning 1pmnC candonsisZoning I and a public hearing at ted ; commission. two neighborhood mestLng and Zoning Commission. s, They i the Planning ro erty with na at the interseon of of 245 acres to get businesst zoning on then p roadway working a commercial trying Attention had been given the adjoining esi dentialcomngtrie rcial areas transition standards were below the residential areas. The neighborhood voted on in addition, existing standards. The height the type Of screen wall which would buffer Che neighborhood office tory there would be an additional 200' beyond of thatysofry oftwof-isce buildings and an n This would give the neighborhood protection and a buildings. The development was consistent with the good transition, Denton Development Plan. '~I 1. g ~S N 1 Iy CU_ S City of Denton City Council Minutes July 16, 1991 Page 6 Kelvin Redfoot stated that originally at, the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting he was in opposition to the development because of the way the Planning Department posted the zoning request signs. Concerns of the neighbors along Bauer Drive, in the northern portion of the Westgate Subdivision, included traffic, congestion, the poor condition of Payne, child safety at road crossing points due to increased traffic, and a proper landscape buffer. While he was not in the immediate neighborhood, he was still affected by it. The traffic congestion and landscape buffer were the major concerns of his neighborhood. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins asked where his section of the neighborhood was located to the proposal. Redfoot replied he was approximately 1000-15001 south and east of the Westgate Subdivision - on the north side of Payne. Carlos Blanco stated that he welcomed business to Denton but was concerned with the quality of life in the area. Children rode bikes in the area and after the development, that would be hard to do due to an increase in traffic. He proposed that Westgate and Payne be blocked off to dead end which would relieve traffic to the neighborhood. only secondary access would be allowed in the area and primary business access would be elsewhere. Joyce Poole felt that there was too short a distance between U.S. 77 and the proposed road through the development, To block off Westgate and Payne would create too much congestion in the area. The petitioner was allowed a five minute rebuttal. Dillard stated that the wall detail was included in the agenda packet. The neighborhood was given the option of either a wall or a landscape element such as a berm or trees. The neighborhood chose the wall. Council Member Trent asked how the development would address I the traffic and safety concerns. Dillard replied that most traffic would go back to Highway 35 and not through the neighborhood. There would be some traffic through Westgate but not an extreme amount. Dillard added that before any development started south of Westgate, the brick wall would be in place, ( The Mayor closed the puhlic hearing. ~ff i 111 f;'. •n { kn a:A i%7 f ti i f i City of Denton City Council Minutes July 16, 1991 Page 7 s Feshari stated that there was a landscape ordinance in place and when. a detailed plan was submitted, the developer would have to comply with the ordinance, There would be a 40' setback on I35, 20' for landscaping, The rest would be for parking with some landscaping included, The following resolution was consideredi NO. R91-043 I A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CONCEPT MAP OF THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN BY EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE NORTHERN URBAN CENTER; AMENDING THE BOUNDARIES OF INTENSITY AREA 19 OF IX A OF THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN; AND PROVIDINGDFOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, 1 Trent motioned, Chew seconded to approve the resolution. On I roll vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins "aye," Smith "aye," Chew "aye," Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance for the rezoning of a 245.9 acre tract from the Agricultural district to the Planned Development district and approving a Development Plan for a mixed use development consisting of office, retail, commercial, manufacturing, and institutional uses on property' located in the n y P i) the northeast and southeast quadrants of I35N and Loop 208 (under construction). (The Planning and zoning Commission recommended approval 5-0 at its June 12, 1991 meeting.) Z-91-•004 The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. The following ordinance was considered: N0. 91-101 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING A CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURAL (A) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 245,8 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF U.S. INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35W AND NORTH AND SOUTH OF LOOP 208; APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DISTRICT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. F. ~1s r~ i~ i, f I City of Denton City Council Minutes 3 July 16, 1991 i Page 8 l i Hopkins motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ord Ch 4Jetaye4n roll vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins aye,` Smith aye, llaye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried Petry unanimously. i D. The Council held a public to consider approval of the preliminary and final replats of the Co Lot 6R Landing CoDrive and subdivision; from Lots 6A and 6B; Block 1; into 196 acre site was an the northwest corner °fZoningWindsor mmission s Cedar Hill Road, (The Planning 1991 meeting,) I recommended approval 5-0 at its June 26. Owen Yost, Urban Planner, stated that the .196 acre tract was located an the northwest c Theamendment Road. It wss pa rt of Planned orner of Windsor DevalopmentD72ve aCwould anew single-family use on this one lot. i The Mayot opened the public hearing. John Jeanes, petitioner, stated that he wished to build a single family but he tract. Thare a pfamily zoning wort of the proposal on the tract, No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Hopkins motioned, Trot seconded to approve the preliminary and final replats. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins "aye," Smeith „aye, It Chew "aye," Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry Motion carried unanimously. ! E. The Council held a public hearing and considered i an amendment to the concept adoption of an ordinance approving fatted as Cooper Landing, plan for Planned Development No, 72; p changing the use from duplex to single family, The .196 acre tract was on the northwest corner of Wandsor ing a Commission Hill Rd. Z-91-049 (The Planning recommended approval 5-0 at its June 26, 1991 meeting.) stated that this ordinance was in conjunction N6yor Castleberry with ith th the previous public hearing and the staff report was the ( same. 1 The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing, I ti - t E. fi i f j City of Denton City Council Minutes July 16, 1991 Page 9 1 i The following ordinance was considered: NO. 91-102 { AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMI,NDING THE BOUNDARIES OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO, 720 AS ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. 89-50, BE DELFTING 0,196 ACRES FROM THE DISTRICT; ADOPTING A REVISED CONCEPT PLAN SHOWING THE NEW DISTRICT BOUNDARIES; CHANGING THE ZONING ON THE EXCLUDED LAND FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO SINGLE FAMILY (SF-7); PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000; AND DECLARING 1 AN EFFECTIVE DATE, 1 Hopkins motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins "aye," Smith "aye," Chow "aye," Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye," Motion carried unanimously. F. The Council held a public hearing and considered { adoption of an ordinance approving an amendment to Planned `k Development No. 5 to allow additional parking and a storage building on 2.117 acres, owned by DeBerry Funeral Directors.. The site was on the south side of University Drive, 299.5 feet west of Ector Street. Z-91-008 (The Planning and zoning commission recommended approval, 5-0 at its June 26, 1991 meeting. ' Owen Yost, Urban Planner, stated that this was a minor amendment to the detailed plan of Planned Development No. 5, purposing a separate storage building and additional parking. There would be no access to Emery Street, to the south of the site and access to University nrive was strictly limited by the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. The stor§ge building and the additional parking spaces would not warrant any additional curb cuts, and none were proposed, The Mayor opened the public hearing. Bill DeBerry stated that he would like to build a two car garage on the site in the immediate fature, The additional parking spaces and storage building would not be built at this time Council Member Trent asked if the neighbors had been contacted regarding the project, DeBerry replied that he had spoken with many of the neighbors. Some were confused by the letters sent by the Planning Department, Thay had been led to believe that he was building a mini warehouse, i r tsa>v,~q( ps k i City of Denton City Council Minutes Jllly 16, 1991 Page 10 { No one spoke in opposition. ¢ The Mayor closed the public hearing. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 91-103 TEXAS, PROVIDING AN ORDINANCE OT THE CITY OF DENTON, FOR THE APPROVAL OF AN AMENDED DE'SAILED PLAN FOR THE D BY ORDINANCE PLANNED DEVE D-5)S DISTRICT ESFORL A H PENALTY IN THE N0. 89-147 ( {PPD--5): PROVIDING MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF 32,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF$ AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Smith seconded to gads Smith e"ordina Chew Onaroll aye 11 vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins aye. at~e Motion carried Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry unanimously, 6. Consent Agenda Hopkins motioned, chew seconded to approve the Consent Agenda e ~ as presented, On roll vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins „aye.„ Smith "aye," Chew "aye," Perry "aye," and Mayoc Ca9t18b8CT nay " Motion carried unanimously. A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid #1211 Water Consulting SVC & Chemical supply 2. Bid #1261 - Pre Crusher and Container 3. P.O. 013910 - ESRI B. Tax Refunds - j 1, Considered approval of a tax refund to United Title Co. - $691.92 7, ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance the and providing for cts competitive c supplies or accepting equipment h ~ contracts services. (6.A.2. - Bid #1261) k 'k f City of Denton city council minutes July 16, 1991 Page 11 The following ordinance was considered: } NO. 91-104 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins "aye," Smith "aye," Chew "aye," Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye.'' Motion carried unanimously. I B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. 6,A.1. - Bid #1211 The following ordinance was considered: NO. 91-105 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING i FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 1 Smith motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance, on roll vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins "aye," Smith "aye," Chew "aye,' Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for purchases of i materials or egvipment which ate available from only one course ; in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids, (6.A.3. P.O. #13910) The following ordinance was considered: NO. 91-106 AN ORDINANCE PRO THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS ~ PROVIDING FOR TF FOR PURCHASES OF MATERIALS 09 EQUIPMENT WHICH ARE AVAILABLE FROM ONLY ONE SOURCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. i' i N:: tiffs i City of Denton City council minutes July 16, 1991 Page 12 i nance. t Hopkins motioned, Smith Hopkindeaayoadopt Smi 1111 ththeYe d chew a ayaan { roll vote, Trent "aye," ,aye Motion carried Perry "aye,' and Mayor Castleberry unanimously. D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance asbetwoen the City of approving an amendment to an agreement N Denton and Services Program for Aging dhich amended Manager, eising stated contractsmnhat the City were ordinances had ith services agencies. Committee recent with two social recommended that wthe he a Human service { D Council, t $2700, j money which the City had allocated to Parents Anonyencies whose be reallocated to three of the social service cege The tse budget was out &uring the last budgeting p ordinances formally carry out that recommendation from the Human Services Committee, Council Member Trent asked what happened to Parents Anonymous, City Manager Harrell replied that they went out of business and stopped offering services, May Pro Tem Hopkins stated that she hoped there would be a f Mayor or ~ { discussion regarding allocating the funds to SPAN transportation as that was where the money was needed, Barbara Ross, Community Development Coordinator, replied that $800 would go back to SPAN for social services. Hopkins motioned, Perry seconded to allocate the $2700 to SPAN to assist in the transportation shortfall, Council Member Chew left the meeting with a potential conflict of interest, F i On roll vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins tiont carried Smith "aye," Perry {aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye.,- Council Member Chew returned to the meeting. E. The Council was to considadoption n the E ordinance approving an amendment to an agreement City of Denton and Denton County Friends of the Family. This item was not considered following the Coune W s decision on ttsm D. { I I 7 k _r E ` City of Denton City Council Minutes ,Tuly 16, 1991 Page 13 1 F, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance amending Section 18-109 of Chapter 18 of the Code of ordinances to provide for designation of parking spaces for exclusive use of disabled persons on public property; designating said parking spaces on Austin Street and Walnut Street; and providing for a penalty of a fine of not less than fifty dollars, nor more than two hundred dollars. (Tbe Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommended approval.) t Jerry Clark, City Engineer, stated handicapped customers and employees using the First State Hank building had difficulty getting into the building across traffic. The original request was for one handicapped space in the area either on Austin or Walnut to avoid heavy traffic and the exiting of handicapped individuals into traffic on Locust and Hickory. The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission felt that more spaces would be needed. one space was proposed on Walnut and two spaces on Austin. Council Member Trent asked if it was too much to go from no spaces to three spaces. Perhaps only one space could be done on Austin at this time. Clark replied that this was the recommendation from the Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission. They were trying to help as much as possible as there was already no parking on i Austin Street, Mayor Pro Tom Hopkins replied that the number did not matter. What mattered was the need to help people in that area. The two spaces on Austin would not be a problem as there was no parking in the area anyway. Council Member Chew stated that there ware steps on both sides of the building on the Austin Street side. The space on Walnut Street would help the most. f Council Member Smith stated that the cost mentioned was $150 for signs excluding labor, Staff report indicated that the Walnut space would be inset into the sidewalk. That would involve labor and how would it be paid. Clark replied that the ramp on the corner had been already planned and that the Bank would participate on a 50/50 basis with the cost, Council Member Smith asked about two spaces on Walnut, Clark replied that they were flexible regarding the placement. There was one restriction with vaults in the area. It would be i quite expensive to relocate those vaults for the necessary concrete work. j l l . f7 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 16, 1991 Page 14 The following ordinance was considered: NO. 91-107 r SECTION AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING TO PROVIDE FOR DESIGNATION OF PARKING SPACES FOR EXCLUSIVE USE OF DISABLED PERSONS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY, DESIGNATING SAID PARKING SPACES ON AUSTIN STREET AND WALNUT STREET; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF A FINE OF NOT LESS THAN FIFTY DOLLARS, NOR MORE THAN TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN i EFFECTIVE DATE. Trent motioned, Hopkins seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins "aye," Smith "aye," Chew "nay," Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried with a 5-1 vote. 0. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance repealing sections 18-51, 18~-52, 18-531 18-54, 18-55, and 18-56 of Chapter I8 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton relating to regulation of trucks and truck routes; amending i Division 2 (Trucks and Truck Routes) of Chapter 18 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton; establishing definitions; establishing designated truck routes and regulating _ for departure therefrom; providing for exceptions; prohibiting certain use of residential etreets; establishing requirements for the operation of concrete trucks; establishing a maximum vehicle load limit; providing for a maximum penalty of two hundred dollars for violation thereof; and providing for a severability clause. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommended approval.) Jerry Clark, City Engineer, stated that the proposed ordinance had been studied for over a year. comparisons had been made with neighboring cities. Truck routes placed heavy loads on streets. To prevent street damage, the routes needed to be on newer streets which were thicker, designed for higher speeds, , and turning movements. The proposed ordinance had more definitions, a better description of when a delivery route was allowed, an updated truck route designation list, and specifics on concrete trucks. All local trucking companies and interested persons were invited to a Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission meeting, Each company received a copy t the proposed ordinance and seemed satisfied that the ordinance i was reasonable. . Council Member Perry asked about the route from University and Carroll through Northridge. i j k' IK • City of Denton City Council Minutes July 16, 1991 Page 15 Clark replied that trucks mould need to use F:lm Street. Trucks should not be in the Northridge area. not Hop Mayo Pro T ins a comer home with hiskcab after 10 p.mcowithnthelnew ordinance, Clark replied that it would probably be a legal interpretation ( _ .5 of "operate", lie would define oerate as making deliveries, j etc. and not returning home to park the veh'cle. j City Attorney Debra Dra4'ovitch stated that section 18-59 stated that operate meant "drive". Hopkins motioned, Trent seconded to postpone consideration of i r the ordinance until the first meeting in August, chew on roll Perry Trent "aye," Hopkins aye, 11 Smith aye. ,,aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. H. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance designating and establishing a school safety speed zone on ' State Highway FM 426 (McKinney street) for both directions of travel between Station 160 4 40 and Station 170 + 40 measuring 1 a total distance of one thousand (1,000) feet in length and l being centered a distance of five hundred (500) feet on each side of the main entrance to Billy Ryan High 5ohool; reducing the maximum prima facie speed limit for such portion of said street from fifty-five (55) miles to thirty-five(35) miles per hour during certain hours; providing a penalty of a fine not to exceed two hundred dollars ($200); and providinga soverabssion clause. (Thb Citizens Traffic Safety Support recommended approval.) k Jerry Clark, City Engineer, stated the Dilly Ryan High School wousld proposedntog be Bins Augausllt.ed prior atotthat opening, scNormallyg school zones were installed after facility be comppenes any accurate studies of traffic patterns could j using a traffic projection and excellent state cooperation, the proposed school zone was approved by the state of Texas, i Mayor Castleberry asked who was responsible for McKinney Street. the State Highway's j Clark replied McKinney street was responsibility from Janie street out, The state was responsible for all activities on a state road only udingd paving, maintenance of signs, etc. The City f responsibility for signalization, responsibilityroft thewerSetawtidened Highway I, Mayor lCastleberr anes, it stated be the that It the four laness, , woul Department. 1. dn„Wa City of Denton City Council Minutes July 16, 1991 Page 16 Clark replied yes. The following ordinance was considered: 91-108 AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING AND ESTABLISHING A SCHOOL k SAFETY SPEED ZONE ON STATE HIGHWAY FM 426 (MCKINNEY STREET) FOR BOTH DIRECTIONS ON TRAVEL BETWEEN STATION 160 + 40 AND STATION 170 + 40 MEASURING A TOTAL DISTANCE OF ONE THOUSAND (1,000) FEET IN LENGTH AND HUNDRED (500) FEET , BEING CENTERED A DISTANCE OF FIVE. ON EACH SIDE ON THE MAIN ENTRANCE TO BILLY RYAN HIGH SCHOOL; REDUCING THE MAXIMUM PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT Ili FOR SUCH PORTION OF SAID STREET FROM FIFTY-FIVE (55) MILES TO THIRTY-FIVE (35) MILES PER HOUR DURING CERTAIN HOURS; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00); PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. If Hopkins motioned, Perry seconded to adopt the ordinance, on roll vote, Trent "aye." Hopkins "aye," Smith "ayMo'tihewC"aye." Perry "aye and Mayor Castleberry 'aye., tried unanimously. I. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving an agreement between the City of Denton and the State of Texas for installing traffic signal controllers within the City of Denton. Jerry Clark, City Engineer, stated that the State had agreed to fund some signals in the area. With the recent he census, tthe state would only be doing the funding Highways. The two signals would be at Avenue D and 135 and at US377 and 135. The program was very positive in that it allowed the City's maintenance personnel Co materials and maintain a standardized system. This labor costs which was cost beneficial. The City also received j reimbursement for labor. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 91-109 S AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY ' OF DENTON AND THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLER£ WITHIN THE OITY OF DENTON; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. i ft; ~ !S .YalEe17N f City of Denton City council Minutes July 15. 1991 Page 17 Hopkins motioned, Perry seconded to a9 irhthayeo chowe'ayo, oll vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins "aYe" "aye." Motion carried r Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry unanimously. Resolutions 1 A, The council considered approval of a resolution Im Street, 100 locic of North E f ti temporarily closing the 1loo bblo k of North Locust street and block of West Oak street, 100 block of Wpst Hickory street on September 28, 1891' ' the Jane Hiles, Main Street Manager, stated the AppzoveWOU hadbe been sixth year for county Seat Saturday. received from the majority of the merchants on the Square. T & k' Sons and T & L Shoes Would not e iti°n in petition. Also McBride petition Music and Fawn signed the businesses had rear entrances on streets which would be open bus , during the event. The following resolution was considered! NO. R91-044 A RESOLQTION TEMPORARILY I Y CLOSING THE BLOCK 100 ~ LOCK OF NORTH F STREET, 10 STREET, VIDING HICK STRNORT EET ON LOCUST SEPTEMBER STREET 28, AND 100 191, AND KPROOF WXST HICKORY H S FOR AN EF'F'ECTIVE DATE. motioned, Smith soconded to approve the resolution. On Perry "aYe~" rollvote, Trent "aye," Hopkins nayo," Smith 11 me tarried f Petry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry u unanimously. 4 13, The council considered approval of = reesolugtiion i authorizing a traffic light synchronization p esources. I application to promote the conservation of energy I Jerry Clark, City Engineer, stated that in the past large oil companies were involved in oil overcharges,raThe State obtained that money which was now redistributedhiass Brant would develop received several recent grants. were timing schemes Co save motorists money, Throe Proposals o F Carroll for consideration Blvd. from Sherman U,S, 390 I3y to Loop x88 and Elm and t,oust from Mulberry, Parkway to sycamore. The following resolution was considered, ,I :...r. ; 1 f I I . uLSRiFI't,~ 1 i City of Denton City Council Minutes I July 16, 1991 Page 18 NO. R91-045 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A TRAFFIC LIGHT SYNCHRONIZATION PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION TO PROMOTE THE CONSERVATION OF ENERGY RESOURCES; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Trent motioned, Hopkins seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins "aye," Smith "aye," Chew "aye," Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "iye." Motion carried + unanimously. co The Council considered approval of a resolution approving development plans for property leased to Fox 51 Ltd. ' at the Denton Municipal Airport. (The Airport Advisory Board recommended approval.) Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that the lessee had not signed the lease to date. Fox 51 leased property which was an amendment to the original lease in 1990 which allowed theta to build the furthest building to the west. This resolution would approve all of the building site which would have to be done if Fox 51 accepted the remainder of the lease. If the remainder of the lease was not executed, only the one building could be built. The following resolution was considered: NO. R91-046 A RESOLUTION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR PROPERTY LEASED TO FOX-51 LIMITED AT THE DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Trent motioned, Chew seconded to approve the resolution, on roll vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins "aye," Smith "aye," Chew "aye," f Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council was to have considered approval of a resolution authorizing Amendment No. 2 to the Airport j Commercial Operator Lease Agreement between the City of Denton and Fox 51 Ltd. (The Airport Advisory Board recommended approval.) This item was pulled from consideration. E. The Council. considered approval of a resolution j nominating a member to the Board of Managers of the Denco Area 9--1-1 District. 1 1 1 5 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 16, 1991 Pago 19 i C City Manager Harrell stated that the Board was made up of five m tubers plus an advisor. Two members were selected by cities in Denton County who received 911 service. The term of Olive Stephens was up for renewal. Hopkins motioned, Smith seconded to nominate olive Stephens as a members of the Board of Managers of the Denco Area 9-1-1 District. On roll vote, Trent "aye," Hopkins "aye," Smith y "aye," Chew "aye," Perry "aye," and Mayor Castleberry "aye." Motion carried unanimously, ` 9, Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, presented the following items: A. Appointment to the Civil Service Commission Harrell announced the reappointment of Charldean Newell to the commission. B. Schedule for next meetings - ltarrell proposed the following schedule for upcoming meetings: 7/23 work session beginning at 5:15 p.m. with presentations from recipients of the Lalor funds except for the Convention/Visitor Bureau 7/30 - two items of business before the Council Reception starting at 5:15 p.m. 8/6 - convene at 4:00 p.m. with a budget study session until 8:00 p,m. and beginning the regular meeting at 8:00 p.m, 8/13 - study session beginning at 5:15 p.m. 10. The following official action was taken on Executive Session items discussed during the Work Session Executive session: Trent motioned, Chew seconded to appoint the following individuals to City of Denton Boards/ Commissions: AirpoC"t Board Rick Woolfolk George Gilkeson Terry Garland Board of Adjustment Bill Colville Ray Griffin Dan Coffey Rebecca Blair Rebecca King l Y::1ilp9 i ra i } City of Denton city council minutes July 16, 1991 Page 20 , , Building Code Board Cliff Reding ' Ed Owens Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission Doug Chadwick Alice Gore tt Betty Duncan 7 Terry White Community Development Block Grant Committee Sara Parker Dennis Stephens Jack Weir Peggy Norton Data Processing Advisory Board Don Edwards Jim Kuykendall Electrical Code Board Greg Mitchell Jim McClanahan Stuart Cawthon Terry Schertx Historic Landmark commission Liz Hays Rita Holcomb W. A. Barker Judith Abbott Howard Watt Elinor Caldwell Humana services Committee Sandra Ables Carol Riddlesporger Gary Truitt Dorothy Damico Linda Holloway Al Parstie Ruby Kerner i Library Board Ted Maines Mary Jo Pickens Dorothy Adkins Irene Price Parke and Recreation Hoard Dalton Gregory Burkley Harkless Neta Stallings G 4. 1 SI+itC~:j 1 F AWE. City of Denton city council minutes July 16, 1991 Page 21 Pla___nnina and 7onina commission Roy Appleton III Mary Evelyn Huey Ivan Glascock Judd Holt Plum in and Mechanical Code Board, George Becker Bob Sullivan Bill Burley Joe Mulroy Public Utilities Board Bob Coplen i Carol Ridens r MPA Board of ectors y Stephens F Beautification Commission Jim Render - 1 year term Judd Jones - 2 year term Gertrude Gibson - 1 year term ! John Cooper - 2 year term i~ Mable Ueveraux - 1 year term Deane Morrison - 2 year term Brenda Fosmite - 1 year term John Rnlow 2 year term Melvin Willis - 1 Year term Dick Engle 2 year term Martha Len Nelson - 2 year term ls Sian Board Of Appe Jim Tucker - 2 year term mike Weibe - 1. year term Sue Smith 2 year term Harry Eaddy - 1 Year term Frank Massey - 2 Year term nowntown Advisoty Board Board was complete Trent "aye,° Hopkins "aye," Smith "aye," Chew on roll vote, ..a~ Motion i 14aye," Perry "ayeand Mayor Castleberry Ye, ! carried unanimously. il. New Busineas ti 1I There were no items of New Business suggested by Corincil ( Members for future agendas. I ! i i S IG2Ya'rr~9. if-'Yltu!' { City of Denton City Council Minutes July 16, 1991 Page 22 Mayor Castleberry stated that Judge Mosely would like the Council and the Commissioners Court to meet in Executive session regarding property within the City. A tentative date of August 6 at 3:30 p.m. in the 1696 room had been set. The Mayor stated that he had been requested by the North Texas Council of Governments to be a part of a delegation to visit with the Chairman of the state Railroad Commission concerning deregulation and the rates of intrastate in relation to interstate travel. There were five delegates at the meeting, Mayor Castleberry made the following appointments to the Denton Housing Authority: Warren Whitson 12. The Council did not meet in Executive Session during the Regular Session. i. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned, BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS JENNIFER WALTERS CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i 3416C i t 4 5 j 1@ i r 3 t DATE: 8/20/91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT f}I, TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTt Z-91-011 - REQUEST ON STREETS~HE EAST SIDE OF CARROLL BOULEVARD BETWEEN RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval unanimously (7-0) on Tuly 24, 1991. SUMMARY: Request to rezone a .413 acre tract of land from "2F" Two Family } District site p BACKGROUNDt See Planning and Zoning Commission Report PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Surrounding neighborhood and the Planning and Development Department FISCAL IMPACTf N/A Reape 11y submitt t Prepared by: L1o d V. Hazrall City Manager Kar n K. Fe ari Urb n Planner e Approvedt rank H. Ro bins, AICP Executive Director Planning and Development 2768x I Ndu-atiY T S PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT Council To: Mayor and Members of the City 1991 Meeting Date: August 20, Case Nn.: Z-91-011 GENERAL INFORMATION Dale Irwin Applicant: 515 S. Carroll Boulevard Denton, TX 16201 as Receiver Trust Corp. for f Current owner: Denton Federal Savings and Loan Assoc., Denton, TeXas 3500 Maple f Dallas, TX 75219-3935 Financial (Joe E, Wiiams, Jr.r InstitutionlSpecialist) Request approval of rezoning a2F Requested Action: ,413 acre tract of land from two family district di "PD" planned development lantfortthed approve a detaile d p office purpose of a professional building. ~ located on the A Location and Size: .413 acre tract east side of South Carroll Boulevard "between MaP10 and Pacific Surrounding Land use and zoning'. sidential use zoned two family North - Re vacant use zoned two family South - Residential use zoned two family East - IOOF Cemetery zoned two family West - ; Denton Development plans y Urban Center (Downtown) i SPECIAL INFORMATION W I t I Transportations The detailed dedicationeonnPacific5andeMaple ,of-way ight x Streets. r' _ _ Ad`5rAi4k 1, ~erypj{ f (Case 2-91-011) Page Two i SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued) I 2, Sidewalks are required along the fronta~3es of Carroll and Maple. 3. The applicant should show curbing, on the plan, where the r existing driveway is to be removed. Drainage: 1 . Site drainage should be routed towards the south and east. All drainage should be routed away from Carroll Boulevard. Water/Wastewater 1, A six (6) inch water line is available on Maple Street. 2. A six (6) inch sanitary sewer line is available on Maple Street. 3, Service will be best achieved by utilizing the six (6) inch sanitary sewer line on Pacific. 4. Fireflow is adequate for this site if the applicant utilizes an automatic sprinkler system. Landscaping fi Because of the location of th bu ldi$grand the fact tha ty the tract is surrounded by tree (3) of this site is in the streetyard. The landscape ordinance requires 20% of the street and to blandscaped. Thein of te applicant is proposing approximately landscaping which exceeds the current requirements. HISTORY On February 4, 1986, the City Council denied a request for a change of zoning on this site from the two family district to planned development district for office use. It app though the site plan violated theipolicy hoof the Denton and Development Plan pertaining to preservation, in addition, the site plan did not meet the requirement n parking spaces. In-reviewing dthetsite plan submitted f impact o on parking with the previous zoning case, staff agrees with the report that Ik this layout did not show sensitivity to the surrounding neighborhood. Since then, a landscaping andtheedeniedesitieiplan ordinance has been adopted. Landscaping of the may have made a difference in preserving the integrity neighborhood. On July 24, 1991, the Planning and zoning Commission recommended approval of z-91-011 (7-0). i ,f, ss ~ { (Case Z-91-011) Page Three ANALYSIS This site is located in the Downtown Urban Center, according to the Denton Development Plan. 't'here is no intensity standard for urban centers= however, other policies of the Plan will be analyzed. A priority policy ofLthedPlan is rthe continued on support of the downtown area. the fringe of this major activity center should be protected by such measures as intensity gradation, strict site design requirements, transportation planning and implementation, and land use balance and landscaping. Further, traffic planning should ensure that no local residential streets are utilized for general Special consideration is given for protection of older residential neighborhoods which have been improved or have benefited from Community Development Block Grants and similar is o federal/state expenditures. South Carroll/Eagle Drive to state£ these areas specified in the Plan. The that in reviewing zoning, subdivision, capital improvements and other proposals, existing neighborhoods will be given specific consideration to ensure stability. Compatible redevelopment is encouraged, including the priority expenditure of public funds over newly expanding areas. which the following 1 Carroll Boulevard is in a specific area in d guidelines are recommended: Duplexes and small scaled multifamily and office developments shall be encouraged in selected nodes subject to the following conditions, 1. Site design to protect adjacent single family housing requiring screening fences, large setbacks, landscaping and sign control. The detailed plan delineates three (3) foot high living screens along the property lines of Pacific and Maple. The property slopes downward towards Eagle Drive, therefore, the residents of Maple Street should not be able to see much of the office building. Although the condition addresses large setbacks, the site design shown there to be a large setback on Carroll Boulevard and Maple, however, the setback along Pacific is shown as five (5) feet from the property line. Staff believes if the building design is similar to the buildings located at Carroll Park Place (515 S. Carroll), the setback should not cause detrimental affects to the surrounding neighborhood. It should be noted that the because one-hour of o the five wall (5) footg property required bouundary have a . the l southern will setback. " i a (case 7,-91-011) page Four i i i ANALXSIS (continued) hould 2. Restrict further on urb Carrocutlsl. to minimize thcuiiasruption of Site design cultion u of s traffic. through traffic parking and on-site c ensure off-street applicant is not proposing any curb cuts on Carroll The and egress will occur vihasn n All ingress, Bring staff aouleva alYzed cts o ' e approach oil Maple well The engine drive the. internal traffic cicug~~~Ptsaandfinds itegeaffneerally proposal on existing acceptable. ed in the participation from residents shall be encouraged 3. and zoning processo t platting licantt has visited with the residents in the The app ' immediate Vi<,inity. site ears that the applicant has designedneighbors,ininuch It aPP ovide sensitivity of the complies with the policies a manner as to Provide summary, this request Denton DeVe.lopmel't Plan. k RECOMMENDATION Commission recommends approval of The planning and Zoning ATTACHMENTS i I.. Location M?P 2, site Plan and zoning Commission meeting o£ e1991, Planning 3, Draft Mi24, July ' 4, ordinance - - I 2758% } a Park place 11 Carroll 91-011 NORTH J w, oAK © lJL1 C~ w w KI D LJ IQKOR HICKORY W 7 ❑~❑Tg MtlCBERRY ~---r-"] OECOM~P S AMO r =SICE m OWN WN i STROUD L 4 _1 ~ W mi CC. JS .Q ~ WAPR ~ ~ x ,I , pgA3RE U 3 ~ CEMETEP 0 a N V1 f ~y~TS ~ g MILL EaGtE RUTH s FANNIN- SIM1A0►j! n SNCOL RG1E U COLLINS OREENLEE o4 EARL pt~GRE x ~S 4 ~C L!NQS£1 -y ALAN / yy OM 94 c OAKw_„• fl~y-- DA7H; 7!'~Qh1 SCAM; NINE i Ski{ A l 1+U 12~1~-- ! cx: a 11~1I F6 ~att r i . r Iq .K f~f 111. M•.... A ~ ~{1 ~ ~ I~~~ ~ ~ i pit ~ 1~1~• ` tti Ji1 ~ y v ~I ~ it y d~ yAR~ E 1 ~ CMS p y.~'_ sry1Y y O / Y! t1 i. f 41 L 4 N IYYM X m X lDYW wur. r _„F_.. _ EVELOPNENT STANDARDS ii `..w arw. T"j-•2?Y~' V,:~t •~'r ~'7i9i~""- J. J..`w . > ~ •l "ul,on <m ~ s1,111 IIII f L L ELO[K 'g 71 ~1 n ~~2~Irr•iw~'I~Ir'w R'.~iw~r~7 ~~'i ~ r 1'I (U S r.."1vT tA. 3iM S IL r K mow ~ , y t :+I 1 1i 1 N., d r ~ Ilgq YMIM I W.IY IIIM W. 1 1tl•IlAl111 i•< ` ! 0 ~rr~-- 1 f .~.A. tm+w I y tl.Y' ' 1'I-yl ,Q ; ` ,rn•w T / X t01ttM I y' 1 w re re , P4 4-Y r 2 1 Arl Is •uhoa Irut n+ "a~ ~ ,WS'.e qr I G X1.."2 `-~---~Yi L,l~i tigr.+."W IICipOPI.E..I W61l191SN1 Cu~MIA.TAM! . K w l C. 'L* " «"W'W` +\Sw ,iCr+wr~, l •Oltw Iirr I.W." I OA!(M ~IA~IM I I IM IIM I"I OLI AIL t 1' ~AAX CARROLL PARR PLACE NO 40T 11 BLOCK A ' 0' =w t 'q'r3i° KSN6 O,/~Y LUMP IN 71k M[LLIAM LOrINO k•IrrYr AMTIIYCI. t • IRWWI'~ v rw J Wr,n a IyllfM1f.tea ~~1 ly w w. a. •111.IWA W11 H~.71 rHM q•"Y w. ..r ~ YIIW~I~r•IW tl II 1 'I la TAY'. . tr~ t P&Z Minutes July 24, 1991 Page 8 They complied with the regulations and and are now more valuable, The difference between these houses and others is that they are a unit. Care must be taken of this area which was trashed after World War II. There is a tendency to think of historic structures as grand or older but there are tax breaks and CDBG funds available to these houses. Mr. Glasscock stated that the Mudds did not want in the District to begin with and they still don't want to be in it. He is not sure that this would set any precedents. The 1 Mudds have not had any choice. it they want out, let them out. Ms. Brock stated that there was opposition to the District when it was created. It is in the nature of creating a historic district that it is almost impossible to have unanimous agreement, Mr, Appleton agreed that it is tough not to look at the individuals but this would be a whittling away. The big picture must be considered. Motion carried (4-3). Mr. Glasscock, Mr. Holt, and Mr. Kamman voted no. k4 v F I. Hold a public hearing and consider the rezoning of a .413 acre tract of land from Two Family District to Planned Development District and approve a Detailed Plan on property located on the east side of Carroll Boulevard, between Maple and Pacific for the purpose of a professional office. Fifteen notices were mailed to property owners within 200' of the sitep 7 were received back in favor, 0 were opposed, and one was received in favor from outside of the 200' i radius. Staff Report: Ms. Feshari presented the staff report (attached). She said that although the property is not technically located on the Square, it is part of the downtown Urban Center. Petitioner: Dale Irwin stated that he is in the real estate and insurance business and is located out of 515 S. Carroll. He is the prospective owner and developer of this ; property. His objective is to request a change in zoning from two-family to Planned Development District (PD). He will build an office similar to his other office building. Parking will be on the north end. There will be a 25' setback off of Carroll which is the same as his building at Carroll and Highland. The landscaping and structure will be attractive. The entrance will be on Maple. The property is currently vacant. It could be developed for duplexes, ~'ry4p4O r , P&Z Minutes July 24, 1991 Page 9 multi-family, or office. Duplex isn't viable because it hasn't happened. Multi-family might work but he thinks offices would be better. The advantage is that it will eye-appealing on a visible street. There will be a minimal amount of traffic and very little at night. Obviously, there will be a benefit to the tax base. His most recent office building at 501 S. Carroll was full before it was constructed. i Mr. Appleton asked who owns the property to the south, { Mr. Irwin said it is owned by the city, ii Ms. Brock stated that she was on the Planning and Zoning commission when the prior request to develop this property was denied. Several neighbors objected to it. She asked if Mr. Irwin contacted neighbors on the north side of Maple. 1 Mr, Irwin said that he has spoken with all but one. He thought the prior request included a drive-through savings and loan. Some of the neighbors were out of town and he could not reach all of them, In Favor: Larry Smith of Richardson stated that he owns f property at Cleveland and Eagle. He sent in the reply form that was outside of the 2001, Mr. Irwin is a friend and everything he has done has been appropriate. He asked that the Commission give favorable consideration to the request, € Chairperson Brock closed the public hearing. Recommendation: Ms. Feshari stated that staff recommends approval subject to the following changes to the detailed plan: 1. Delineate curbing where the existing drive approach is to be removed; 2. Replace the tree type in the center of the site from a Bradford Pears to a Bur oak; 3. Delineate the areas where grass is to be planted; 4. Delineate type and location of barriers along the j parking lot boundaries in order to prevent vehicular encroachment into the landscaped areas. p Mr. Glasscock said that Mr. Irwin is to be commended for his other Carroll Boulevard development, He moved to recommend approval with the staff conditions. Mr. Kamman seconded the motion. P&Z Minutes July 24, 1991 Page 10 Ms. Brock stated that she voted against the request five years ago because there was very little in that petition that would contribute to neighborhood protection. There was no landscape ordinance at that time. She does not think that an office development of this size is necessarily incompatible with residential uses. Some people prefer offices to multi-family. Office can but does not have to damage residences. It can contribute to upgrades of the neighborhood. Motion carried unanimously (7-0), VII, Director's Report Mr, Robbins reviewed the list of upcoming case. He says that the Perot Group have another case coming up on Hwy, 77 and Loop 288, There will be an orientation for the new Commissioner on August 2. All Commissioners are invited to i E. attend. Denton is a better place to live and work than it was five years ago. The present Chair of the commission has played a pivotal role. Successful communities can be almost entirely attributed to their Planning and Zoning Commission. They do the work. What Denton has done over the last 5-8 years is incredible. The st 1 few. Y e set , ears ea t years is he last the the Chairrofathebcommission. itshas been ha pleasureito work with this tough and graceful lady, Mr. Brock said that it will be strange not to be. at the Commission meetings, She has really felt involved, lot of changes have been made, She does not know what her role was but the Commission needs to Former Commissioner Etha Kiker becresve amerinterestedmintthe Commission when her house was flooded. At that time there were no drainage rules. She became known as the drainage Commissioner, Ms, Brock continued that she herself became known as the sidewalk commissioner. It has been her reward that every now and again she sees a sidewalk that wasn't there before and it is nice to know that she is leaving behind something concrete, VIII. Consider a resolution recognizing the outstanding contributions ? of the Planning wisdom, and zoning Commission from u1985 to o 1991Chair. Vice-chairman Holt read a resolution (attached) in appreciation of Ms. Brooks service on the Commission. Meeting adjourned at 6:30 ! p.m. 2755x i } i • k t E 9:\updocs\77164 . f i i ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FRO14 TWO FAMILY DWELLING (2-F) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 0.413 ACRES OF LAND i LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CARROLL BOULEVARD AND MAPLE STREET; PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF A DETAILED PLAN FOR THE DISTRICT! PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLA- TIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Dale Irwin has applied for a change in zoning for E 0.413 acres of land from two-family (2-F) to planned development I (PD) zoning district classification and use designation and for approval of a detailed plan for the district; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended ap- proval of the requested change in zoning; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the change in zoning and approval of the detailed plan will be in compliance with the Denton Development Plani NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the zoning district classification and use designation of the 0.413 acres of land described in Exhibit A, attached to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference, is changed from two-family dwelling (2-F) to planned development (PD) zoning district classification and use designation under the com- prehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. gICTION X. That Exhibit B, attached to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference, is approved as the Detailed Plan for the district in accordance with Article IV of Chapter 33 of Appen- dix e-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances. SECTION III. That the City's official zoning map is amended to show the change in zoning district classification. E SECTION IV. That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $2,000. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense, S CTTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be pub- lished twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. 1'AY 4yi; h'1I 1 , 1991 day of PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ i BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR y ATTEST. CITY SECRETARY JENNIFER WALTERSO t } BY: i t APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: M DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY r By: J! ~ l 1 5 E PAGE 2 ;I 11klf. ~l11,` t f Exhibit "A" h 6510.s1 CARROLL PARK PLACE TWO F I E L D N 0 T E 5 All that certain 0.476 acre tract or parcel of land situated in the William Loving Survey, Abstract Number 754, Denton County, Texas, and being a part of a certain (called) 6.0 acre tract conveyed to Joseph A. Dunham from W. C. Barns on the 23rd day of July 1872, by deed recorded ; in Volume L, Page 387, Deed Records, Denton County, Texas, said 0.476 acre tract being mote particularly described as follows= ` Beginning at the soyt.heast corner of said Dunham tracts ) Thence North 01 degrees 44 minutes 02 seconds West a distance of 203.17 feet to a point in the center of maple street; Thenoe South 89 degrees 35 minutes 45 seconds West with the center of Maple Street a distance of 110.17 feet to a point in tlio east riglit-of- way of Carroll Boulevards i Thence South 01 degrees 44 minutes 02 seconds East with said right-of way a distance of 13.35 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right whose radius bears South 75 degrees 30 minutes 54 seconds West 1959.87 feet, whose central angle is 03 degrees 55 minutes 02 seconds, and whose chord bears South 12 degrees 31 minutes 35 seconds Gast 133,97 ' feet! Thence with said curve and right-of-way an arc distance of 134,00 feet to a point) Thence departing said right-of-way, North 89 degrees 23 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 29.91 feet to a point! Thence North 88 degrees 28 minutes 03 seconds Gaut a distance of 55,15 foot to the Point of Beginning, containing in all 4,476 acres of land. F , >I i I 4 j H-:iq;'y'Ct 31 »5n t EXHIBIT B I a Detailed Plan for Carroll Park Place Two consisting of: 1. Development Information (1 page). 2. Site Plan with Development Standards and Landscape Plan (1 page) 4 ` ~ n k ~ i j N Y i 3 i i l r VIA, Z f { Development Information Statement of Intent of Owner. To develop a district for office use. 2, Relationship to the Maste'r Plan. The plan complies with the Denton Development Plan. + ~E arty may be used for office type 3. Permitted Uses. The prop uses. ' q, Development standards. As shown on the site and landscape plan. i i i i 1 i -t i Y`TH F.' r.," j : f DA'TE' 08/20/9' CITY COUNCIL RkVoRT FORMAT unc;il Mayor and Members of the. City Co TO* k,lovd V. Harrell) City Manager FROM: AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING TO CONSIDER SUB DISTRICT JBCk': pUB],IC HEARING S'CORIC YROPER'TIFS INTO THE OAK/HICKORY HI RECOMMENDATION: at its July 26, 1991 The Planning and Zoning Commission, i. F recommended approval. 7-0 meeting) BACKGROUND: into The City has been }pistoric e Distr Gtai~ hreenrlrroperties the Oak/Hickory adj and 403 adjacent to the di. strict: 306 Mounter 311 Mounts Mounts. of the historic of the following The ordinance prone or more ovides fo h X ion district boundaries isec 36-764 (c)l conditions are met: [ areas or lands (L) When buildings, ptructures, sites, of importance or value related to the district are requested for inclusion; scl to or unknown revio"Iy)nnare reveal d which indicate (2) When facts p the landmark comm or site is posseded of } that a particular bullc{ir cultural or special architectural, archaeological) historical importance or value. etit.ion, on 1 Petition Commissior, After a public hearing and review hof the , 8, lggl, the Nistor.ic andmark J into u1J rcr'erties P' ible with In recommended acceptance of these strict. The architecture is these Propertiesintotthe di and inclusion of ii.nkage the district, boundaries of the district prov conidessidethered nycess for arY historic to be with future areas designation. t I i 4 E xl Nt9rI i The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on July 26, 1991 and also voted unanimously to extend the boundaries of the district to include these properties. I The Oak/Hickory Historic District is a community asset promoting the social, architectural, and cultural heritage of Denton and the current preservation efforts of the petitioners are to be commended as setting an excellent example for other rehabilitation projects in the historic district. i SUMMARY: j The ordinance will amend the boundaries of the Oak/Hickory Historic District to include the following properties; 306 Mounts, 911 Mounts and 403 Mounts. I I PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Historic Landmark Commission, Oak/Hickory Aistorie District FISCAL IMPACT: o None Respe uily submitted: P epared bv; - - L1ay V. Harrell / City Manager f J e Biles, M alter pin Street Program E Approved. r n H . ; Rob ins, AICP Director ~xeautive Planning and Development I: a z ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING THE BOUNDARY OF THE OAK-HICKORY HISTORIC DISTRICT BY ADDING THE THREE PROPERTIES ` LOCATED AT 3051 311, AND 403 MOUNTS STREET TO THE DISTRICT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. i WHEREAS, the owners of the three properties located at 3051 311, and 403 Mounts Street have petitioned the City to include their properties in the Oak-Hickory Historic Districtt and i WHEREAS, the Historic Landmark Commission and Planning and Zon- ing Commission have recommended that the properties be included in the Districtf Now, Thereforet THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSS SECTIOM 1. That the boundary of the Oak-Hickory Historic Dis- trict is amended by adding the properties located at 305, 311, and i 403 Mounts Street to the District, the properties being more parti- cularly described in Exhibit A, attached to and incorpgrated in this ordinance by reference. SECTION 1I. That this ordinance shall become effective im- mediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1991. 1 BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR I ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BYS s APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY r t _ . BY 4 , rA. . i , V Exhibit ,.A., 305 Mounts LECAL DESCRIPTION i t All that certain tract, lot, or parcel of land situated in the William Neil Survcy, Abstract 971, City and County of Denton, Texas, and being more part- iculacly described as follows: DCCINNING at a steel pin at the back of a concrete walk at the intersection of the North line of Gregg Street with the West line of Mounts Avenue; THENCE S 88°J4' W with the North tine of said Gregg Street 140.04 feet to a , steel pin at the Southeast corner of a lot described in a dead from Central Presbyterian Church, U.S.A. to J.B. Farris on July 20, 1926, and recorded in l Volume 205, Page 511, Deed Records of said County; . TliCNCE North 99,5 feet to a fence corner at the back of a concrete curb at the Northeast corner of said Farris lot-, I 1 THENCE East with a fence on the South line of lot described in a deed from E.S. Edwards to Alvin Hill in May of 1915 and recorded in Volume 141, Page 275, I Deed Records of said County, 140,0 feet to a steel pin at cha back of a cpncreLe walk on the west line of Mounts Avenue; i THENCE South with the West line of Mounts and of said concrete walk 96.0 feet` to the place of beginning. I I 1 , i , ~I i Page 1 of 3 I{ l 4 } IN t j I I 311 lAouI1ts LEGAL DESCRIPTION 15 , All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land situated in the City and County of I }f h Denton, State of Texas, being a part of Block No. Fourteen (14) of Subdivision of Wm, Neill 100 114 acre Survey, A-971, the parcel of land herein conveyed being i composed of two tracts conveyed to Alvin ilill by two deeds, one dated May, 1915, executed by E.S. Edwards and wife, Lucille A, Edwards, of record in Volume 141, Page 215, Deed Records of Denton County,; Texas, and the other deed dated I September 26, 1916, execuuted by R. N. Mounts, and wife, Nannie Mounts, `of record in Volume 135, Page 542, Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, being more particularly deacribed as follows: nF,G1NNtNG at the southeast corner of a iot of land conveyed by E.S, Edwarda and wife to Alvin Hill by Deed abovementioned, a stake on the West line of Mounts , Avenue, TIIENCF Northerly along said line of Mounts Avenue, at 56,5 (Pet, passing the i northeast ;orner of said tract conveyed by E.S, Edwards and wife to said Alvin Hill in all 73.5 feet to stake at the northeast, corner of the tract conveyed by R,N. Mounts and wife to said Alvin hill by Deed above referred to; THENCE Westerly along the north line of said tract conveyed by R.N. Mounts and wife to said Alvin Hill 140 feet to the northerwest corner thereof; TIIENCF Southerly Al 17 feet passing the southwest corner of the tract convey,ld by R.N. Mounts and wife to Alvin Hill, same being the northwest corner of t',ie h tract conveyed hv said E.S. Edwards to said Alvin Hill, in all 73.5 feet to the southwest corder of said tract conveyed by said E.S. Edwards and wife to said Alvin Hill; THENCE Easterly along the south line of the tract conveyed in the deed last mentioned 140 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNINO and being the same lot conveyed by Geo. A. Ripley and wife, Katie Rice Ripley, to Clyde L, Oliver by deed dated June 26, 1934, , 1 I Pago 2 of 3 ')tA r 1 y!'-Sift' l IY 0 p,~ f V f 403 Mounts LEGAL DESCRIPTION f Lot 13, Block B, Mounts Second Addition, an addition to the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in volume 149, page 14, of the property records of Texas. Denton County, ' i r i 1 j i ~ r 1 7 r j i Page 3 of 3 t r 4i i PROPOSED INCLUSION H-9 -00 1 OAK-HICKORY HISTORIC DISTRICT DENTON,T I a, , .,a a a 1 a 11 1 +1 `a, ` . 4~;1~ . 1 +a ` .,'k.`a~4` a a,, \a , . 11 ` ``a, 1 •a ,``1, - N 0 ~ t N I`1 1 ` a` a a ` `,a , ♦ a+ a as a1, , , ,1 ,a f~ 4 ~ i4. la `a ,`I ,a` a,a `I `I 1, a1 a 1 a, a~ a a~ a ~ , '4 s ♦ a a a a c a tuft 1 ~a a ~ y 1 a`a a `a + a +a ~a `a , , la a+ • 7 y'-~ y- _ ~ ~ 476 M q ` + , a` a ` r1 r w1 r `1, t ~ MI W 11 `aa Y I f y1 • • t .y • I t } 4 • 1,,`,,+` , ,`+,,,l a``+aall a`I • 7 = a a ` 1 a ` a II a, `a ` a ~ `1, 1 as 1 a `1 a ` a ` ` , a+~ , ♦ la al: a a a+ a a, a~ `a a, a `a a+ `a ,`I ,`a ``a ,,`a , 1`+ a `a,, ` , `a ♦ , +la` ~ ,`4 `I ``a` I a ~ 1 ti~1 \ 11 , , a` a a f, , 1 , 1 1~ a a , a ~ + • `a ar `a a as a a 1: , 1 1 as a a : J !Hw'hbk}I{ a.n=,u.. _ , _ ........v.Hg tl tRMi(1Y~(~k~~ i ~ Y DATE1 8/20/91 i I CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT ~ , I ' T0; Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMI Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager NARY PLAT OF LOT It BLOCK A OF THE CITY BOOSTER PUMP ADDITION SUBJECTt PRELIMI RECOMMENbATIONt The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval ( 6 -0 ) at its meeting of August 140 1991. SUMMARY= The property Sherman Drive. It is to behusedeas of a Nsite forialwater d~ east of ' ' booster pump station. i The right-of-xay dedication along the north property line is in lieu i of street and sidew alk construction Land on Hartlee Field poJdo per See. 34-111 (b) of the Subdivision and Development Re, which alleviates the developer from installing public improvemeati for which he creates no need. The northern Thoroughfare righwplanill r extend to Sherman drive, aligned for construction arterial. The road will be used by the city, ; activities only. The water tanks themselvea r are to built intothetoround and will be landscaped and set back impact on the residential character of the area. Water for o alt landscaping will provided irrigationwater systemsin thehfuture. automatichoses { provisions will allow an ~ BACKGROUND I l The 150951 acre site is located in the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) of Denton. Lot 1 was sold by Elizabeth Vaughan to the City of Denton. servines and facilities as needed, are available or planned City um station will be unattended, no facilities for for. ..Since the p P f sewer or domestic water will be provided, The plat ennforms to the minimum requirements of chapter 34 of the 1 E Code of Ordinances, Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. ' i PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS ARC Fbt Several City departments. Rate-PaYers. 5 i ~Slt. a Il Jl I 5 I City Council Report August 20, 1991 Page Two f FISCAL IMPACTt N/A 3 Respec ully subm ttedt ' Prepared by: Lloyd V. Harre r / City Manager C. Caen Yost, ALA Urban Planner t APPr t , a o a, AICP Executive Director j Planning and Development 2767x i. i t t P# ' ~,h91 9 P 91-023 Hartlee Field Road 1 Booster Pump Station I NORTH ~I j ~ ' I~/Oltl ~rFir•Yl'rR. IMUN •t s n to•rrra Hr I i °°'v rit°t. r It w 1+1 49. r . i 7 t'. ~ I B ` * f `l~ 1 f. , \ rwrM r IO ,i ICY/NW %C UZA •It~°Ar 1 v!{li S r Its :lop 1 440 slow ,.r, r LEI i PRELIMINARY r14..M» PLAT i A. PAO DATE; $112191 SCALE NONE 6N1a=.: f ~ P 91-023 Hardee Field Road, Booster Pump NORTH I 4 ~ - LAKE RAY ROBERTS ~ i l PROJECT z ~P HARTLEE FIELD ROAD I i U. S. 3 80 l i DATE: 8/6191 SCALE: NONE 1 . / ' 2651L-1/3689 1. AND AWARDING A CONTRACT EPTING COMPI\TITIVSUPPLIES OR SERVICES; FO OTHEN PURCHAS ACC E OF MATERIAL , EQUIPMENT, AND PROVIDING PROVIDING FOR THE ERPENDITIJRE OF FUNDS THLRi%FOR ; . FOR TH FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3 tabulated ceived ar the City has solicited, ece rsesary materials, equip- WHitivS~bids for the purchase with the procedures competitive accordanc and has mtatt,e . lsaw w upplie services and and s or City ordinances; in stae ted emploY3re Manager or a designa the ' WHEREAS, the City the herein described bids supplies or the materials, equipment, reviewed and recommended that t' submitted therefor; and lowest responsible bide for Proposals' roposals for services as shown in the provided in the City Budget the d and accepted the WFIEitEAS, the City Council to has be used for the purchase of 'lies or services approve appropriation of Sups materials, equipment,. t herein; NOW3 THEREFORE, BY ORDAINS: numbered THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTONllrRE numbered the following. t SECTION I. Thst the Yiumberetd items lies, o in or services, shown in , s . purcin the equipment) pp the City are assigned thereto, "Bid Proposals on file in the Office number lowest responsible bids Agent bids or ma filed er according qording to the Office of 4 accepted and approved as being' the r, hereby } for such items: AMOUNT BID ITEM NO. VENDOR UM X5.839 5t i CCR4 RCULS BODY CORK• 1_ 1- C } 771.5_-5,156 .._1248.-- -r- 1 :V~s'.aarl t t It roval of Cho above the offer That by the acceptanceteclCity acceptdsag f SECTION 11. reel to for such items an numbeecT~~ems of the submitted bids, supPlieS or services in of the persons submitting equipment, standards purchas quantities e the materials, specifications, LSid accordance with the terms contained in the Bid Invitatiana> and for the specified sums Proposals, and related documents. persons submitting That shouldt~of City and the submitted bids wish to SECTION approve an IIIac, cepted items and as, a result of the into a formal written agreement of the bids, the City Manager enter Approval, and awarding authorized to execute acceptance, sentative is hereby rovided that attached hereto; P or his designated rapz'e conditions, the written contract which shall be the t sums contained the written contract iat in usnti des and tl specified terms, roved and i app # specificat,ians, standards, q n the Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein accepted.' roval of the above SECTION IV. That the acceptance and aP~' Council hereby numbere terns of the; submitted bids the C ty pursuant to a written authorizes the expenditure '0'1 funds therefor in the amount and in , or cco with the approved but ~ accordance pursuant thereto as a authorized herein. contract made shall become etieotiva SECTION V. That this ordinance . imme are y upon its passage and approval day of 1991. PASSED AND APPROVED this ' BOB CASTLr,13ZFLRYr 'MAYOR ATTEST: MILT I E WAL S, C 'Y ECRE~AKY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL POA~ITY ATTORNEY DE811A AD MI DRAYOVITCH, BY: PAGE TWO S j DATE: August 20, 1991 CYTY_COUnCIh_RROAT T0: Mayor and Members of the amity Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager 1 SUBJECT: BID # 1273 C014MERCIAL REFUSE TRUCKS to the as listed below: lowostEb dde¢gmee{tinge d awarded Item 1 A. Truck Cab/Chassis tole Dallas Peterbilt at $67,577.00 each total price $13511 00, Item 1 B. Front load Packer Body to Davis Truck at 1 $35,435.00 Each total price $70,870.00. f Item 2, Truok Cab/Chassis and sideload body to 1 Southwesterr. Equipment at $72,376.00. gp~~gg; This bid is for the purchase of two (2) Peterbilt/Pak Mor oombination front load commercial refuse j truoks and one (1) Ford/Emeo combination side load commercial truck. 1 Total bid, Item 1 is $206,024.00 for two (2) Peterbilt,/Pak Mor front load trucks. Total bid Item 2, is $72,376 for one Ford/Emoo Side sideload truck. One Front Load refuse truck is a replacement for Rig #2028 whioh was to be retired last year. The two remaining units are required to properly equip the City of Denton Solid Waste Division for the assumption of all oommeroial service. Collection containers will be presented to Council for award at a later date. @9qK4BPbVp ; Tabulation sheet. TE_Di City of Denton Solid Waste Division and commercial refuse customers. NIM_10-PA9.1 : These trucks will be funded from a Third Party lease/purchase agreemont to be presented to Council in November 1991. This date is determined by delivery of equipment and implementation of the expanded Commercial Service, Equipment is due to be delivered the first atwo re weeks in December. Since third party interest rates variable the actual bid and award must take place as olose to the payment date as passible, First payments will be due Dooember 30, 1991, 1 _ T j Ilr City Counoil Report August 20, 1991 h i Page 2 of 2 Respeo flAlly subwitted: r<wd Y. Harrell Ci ,.f Manager Approovve-d-s~ Names Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Titles Purahasing Agent TS/,jh 1TA.DOC f i i ; i n a- s BIT, A 1273 + I { I I i I I I I f 1 I I I I I 1 I BID WE WtUCIAL RFF1M TRMt, { DALLAS I DAVIS I MA MAY 1BILL lA'Ml IDS I SMM- 1 S0 MJ- 1 MEiIJO I DAVIS 1 IPE UBILT I TRUCK I INT. I FQJD I 14USJF3@I I = ERN IM TRUCK{ TM I 1 (1) I I I I MJP. I EWIP. I I (2) MEN DATE MUM 6, 1991 I I I I I ! (1) I (2) I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 8 1 Qj"1 I rm ik=lPTICN f vmn I VamOR I VEMH ) VENDOR I Vmw I VNNDOR I VE1 M I VENDOR I VENDOR I ~I_i { I { f I I I E I 1 { 1 - { ( I I I { 1 1 1 ! I E I ! I I 1 1 I 2! TRUCIC CAB/CNASKS ! $667,577 1 $679993 1 N/B 1 NIB I N/B I N/B I N/1B I WB I N/B I I 2 I 32 YD F.L. PACKER BODY I NIB I $35,43 I NIB I NM I N/B I NIB I NIB { NIB I NIB I I 2 1 TRUCK & BODY { N/B 1 $103,428 1 NIB I NIB I NIB I NIB I $106,443 I NIB i N/B I 1 I i j I tfxl TRUCK I I SdffJE I I I ( f Awm 1 I i l I xPEnITOR 1 I I I 1 )MIT% I I 1 I m BCDY I I PAJQ?JR 1 1 I I I EL PAK l I I I I I EI~ooB I I ( I ! I ! E I Dl1dVF.RY I 1120 DAYS 1 I I I I I I 2 1 1 1 TRU CM/Qi k= 1455,867 I N/B I $45s453 I $43,684 I NIB I N/B I NIB I NIB 1$45,753.871 ( 1 1 30 YD S.L. PACKER BODY I M I N/B I NIB f N/B I N/B { WB I N/B I N/B I $29,900 I ti ! 1 I TRUCK & BCVY N18 I N/B { N/B I N/B { N/B 1 $72,376 ($751120 { $72,995 !$•75,743.871 i I l I I 1 I I 1 I I I iHFU MM I I I Ilan. I FORD I I FORD IGM I F01~ I E~ ! I I I I I I I LN 8000 I I LN 9000 1 LN 8000 1 1 1 1o B= I I I ! I 130 YD JMI JTtco 1 90 IPAMM HUI I ! { I I f 1 1 I 1 1 291 r I I 1 I I 1 1 { I I I I I I DELIVE]iY IDEC 1-15, 1 145-60 DAYS1 90 DAYS I IDEr 1s 91 IDEr It 91 IDEC 10 91 1 120 DAYs I I 1 I 1991 I I I I. I I I ! i I I ADDWH I 1 I YES I YM I I I YM I YES ! 1 j j j I f I ! 1 1 I I I i y t Page 2 of 2 BID 1273 I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I 1 I I I I I I BID NAME cafilffa L rousE TRUCK S DAVIS I DAVIS I DAVIS I MIT 1 SMUT 1 SUM 1 tUMM I MMIM 1 WM. I I TRUCK I TRUCK I TRUCK Imm ar.. IwHn E am I*= a.c I =a I TRURO [mm *m I I (3) 1 (4) 1 (5) I (1) 1 (2) 1 (3) I (1) I (2) 1 INC. I CPM DATE ALU= 6x 1991 I I I I I 1 I 1 I i I~_I I I I 1 6 I QTY I M DESCRIPTION 1 VENMR I VRM I VFlM I VENDONI I VENDOR I VEt4DOR ( VENDOR i VENDOR I VEN M I _I_! i h I I I _I i _1 I_ I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I l I I I I ! I I I I I I 1 I 2 WM CAB/CHASSIS I NIB I N/B I N/B 1 $67,993 1 14/13 1 $67,943 1 N/B I NA I N/B I i I 2 I 32 YD F.L. PACKER BODY I N/e 1 NIB I NIB I NIB NIB I 14/B I N/B I $42,000 1$49,281 I I 2 I TRURO a BODY I N/B I N/B I N/B I $110,883 $1021907 1 $103,428 1 $112,000 1 NA I N/B I I I I 1 I 1 106,673 1 1 1 1 1 I I wu Y7iia S NIB 1 NM I N/B I at 1 wx 64 I xPE rmR I MAC I I I I I I 1 I I mDTDOR wX 64 I I P41600S I I I I M BCM 1 N/B N/B 1 NIB I FZ PAK PAK1°pR 1 PM IM 11H= I I LFAC7{ I I I I f I I I® t1>ID I I I i EL104 I I DII.IVIIiY I I ( I 11 1 /fA190-120 BAYI 30 DAYS 1 30 DAYS 1 90 DAYS I 2 I 1 I TRURO CAB/CHASSIS 1*43,920.371 $45,620 1 $43,553 1 $145x620 I NIB I $45,620 I NIB I NIB I NIB I 1 I 30 YD S.L. PACER B[Efit 1 $29x990 1 $29,990 1 $29,950 1 N/B 1 NAB I N/B I NIB I N/$ I N/B 1 1 1 1 TRUCK & BDDY 1$73010.371 $75,610 I $13,543 I 0,970 I N/B 1 $75,610 1 NIB 1 N/B I N,^3 I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I i ran TId1LK I FUU I ar. I cMC 1 I I I I f I I I LN M 11';'111042 I I m I m I Pax MDR I PAK MB I PAK MR I I I I I I I I I I MA 29 1 I I I I I I 1 I ( i I 1 I I I I I I I ! I I I DII.IVF1i7r 1 120 DM 1120 DW 1 120 Dais 1 I 190-120 DAY I ( 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 l AMM M I I i I Y>s f 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I S 1 I I 1 I 1 ! i ! I 1 I I I I 1 I I i Via. ry EXHIBIT A s" BID $ 1268 I I BID NAME OIu & GREASES ; MID AMERICAN AMER OPEN HATE 7-30-91 I I f 0 I QTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR 1 1 1 I I HYDRAULIC OIL I 102.30 DR I 2 I I DE%TRON } 141.90 DR I .87 QT 1 I I 135.20 DR 3 I I 15N -40 } 89 QT 4 i TRACTOR FLUID I 144.65 DR I i I 1 * 15.70 PAIL 5 1 I TRANS. FLUID I 144.65 DR 1 - f } ! NIB 1 } 1 6 } I PS FLUID i 206.800 DR { I I I } 7 } I HYD OIL(NON-COND) 1 207.90 DR j I I $ I I 10 W OIL DRUM 130.35 DR I 9 I 1 10 W OIL QUARTS i .87 QT I 141.90 DR 101 I ( 50 W OIL NIB I 11I 1 90 W GEAR LUKE l 172.00 DR 1 i I I I ! } 121 1 W B OREASE j •98 TUBE 13I I GEAR GREASE i .98 TUBE 141 1 CHASSIS GREASE 1 98.40 DR } *N/B 2 GAL NIB QT i I I DELIVERY 1 2 DAYS I I I } k I I I } f f I . k Y { K •1 1 DATE: AUGUST 20, 1991 ~.~T}C_~glii3~~L_)3EPQSS. Mayor and Members of the City Council TO: FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager I SUBJECTt HID !11255 - HYDRAULIC TOOLS AND ACCESSORIES pjQ~t we reoommend this bid be awarded to theltelow ms fication for each of the itoms I bidder meeting spedi Corp. in the total Camount of { 1 thru 6 to Commercials Body II! 51 and items T thru 15 to ;EC Equipment o. in the f $6,839•. total amount of $6t182.82. F` 51FM11~g~: This bid is for hydraulic tools and acoessoriTruok~. be used on a new Water lower & Sealer Field rice bye UEC but y did not 8 was bid at by same price Items 1 thru b were bid E to meet specifications. delivery as opposed oompanies buttC3hadaa 14 day at Commercials Body's BBSeSIBQSI~II~t Tabulation aheet. YflS?9Il6M~~.-pF•~6flT~lE~1T--.~-~B~,~AF~F~~~Bpe Water and Sealer field services capital equipment- Budgeted funds #620-081-0461-9107. Respebtf ly submittedt v Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Approvedt Name: Denise pUyero - Titlot Senior DH/jh 178.DOC 1 BE # 1255 ~ I I ~ I I I I 1 I CQ41EFCIAL I U.E.C. I BID NAME WMAULIC TOCL 1 A-1 FWAL i CONLEY LM AOCE590OM i 1 E BCOY CORP. I 1 MEN DATE 5-21-91 I I I _I I _ I I CIF I rrm MCRaMON I Vm= I =MR i VOUR ; v> noR -I I N/B I $0.25 1 $724.10 I $665.00 1 1 1 I I CHA121 SAW I N/B I N/B 1 $1,447.80 I $1,820.00 1 2 1 1 CND HAMMER um I N/B 1 $741.40 1 $689.50 1 4 I I sm I NIB I $1,700.00 1 $1,310.71 1 $10050.00 5 I I = HAMMFit I NIB f $1,650.00 1 $1,847.oo 1 $1,533.00 NIB I NIB 1 $768.501 V42.50I 6 1 I nfAGT W EN I I 7 I I VALVE BM a f NM I N/B 1 $21 0.00 1 $2,335.00 1 8 I I VALVE EUMM I N/B ( N/B 1 $2,850.00 1 $2,850.00 1 9 1 1 REVCi=CN OOVm I N/9 1 NIB I $295.00 1 X95.00 1 101 1 KEI I N/B l N/B I $168.00 1 $168.001 11I I IORM ARd EXT. 1 NIB I NM I $69.00 1 $69.00 1 NIB I N/B I $3.00 1 $1.56 1 131 1 CIT= I N/B I NIB I $2.84 1 $1.61 1 $43.58 1 $27.58 1 1 N/B I N/B 141 1 QUICK ?[ER I N/B I NIB I $662.50 1 $490.54 151 I HOSE REQEL, I 1 1 1 l 1 DRIVENY i i 1o DAYS ; 30 DAYS 1 14 DAY5 DRMN 1 tEamoN I F.O.B. I I I I I 1 j I I 1 ~ ~ ~ I 1 I I 1 ` 5> 45 3 10 ~j f DATE: August 201 1991 4 Council TO: Mayor and Members of the City Harrell, City Manager FROM: Lloyd V. ELD 42 SUBjSCTi BID 11274 -500 140M UNISHI, CONCENTRIC 3 PHASE C&BLE eachditemawarded to the low $$ScQMM$f1p0334T1~s eoificationdforthis bidder meeting p 1. & 3. 500 MCM Unishield and 795 bare aluminum Cummins $89,355.0.~0 2. 92 concentric 34/ $3 KBS Electric $3 t electrical distribution cable and ~~$ys This bid is fo r electr which has been ousnveny wire. This will replace warehbideailospweecriofripcraitcieon. on it On em item depleted,. Poleline Electric since but the cable they bid did not meet Cummins and KBSI firm 2, the price bid was the same from holding, the price Cummins qualified their bid by not r E days, we recommended this item be for our spoif y awarded toeKBSlElectric ~84KSL~QUs Tabulation sheet, Working Capital for 6M+g DE HTMFII~_f E ctrj_ DiS~TEIzi of Electrc Distribution Materials. warehouse inventory soot X710-043-0582'8708. Budg ~~asiAL.Ih1E9S+Ss eted Funds Respect liy submitteds Lio d V Harrell city manager Approved: Names Denise Harpoo Titles Senior Buyer DH/Sh 17b.DOC 6 le q 1 I I I 1 ! p 1274 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I T81plE 1 CLTl~>3 1 PciFIS1E IexrF:srrA s~Rrlsl j am OE ME 6 4IIRE i O.E. S "U Jim car. i 1aa~ua4 i 1 I {~s~IC SSm MMMMIM I I ~ 1 I { 1 _I I aKZi ooze 4 I QW I I7tm pg9prlP1'ICN I vtwal I vQ" i voea+ i vmwn I - - 1 I I I I I I ~ rare I rrro I x.595 ~ 45,380 1° 44.513 ~ ripe ` 1 1120001 500 11 1 utaaaaD i $5,551.500 1.500 1 H13 I I { { I 1 I I 441.050 1 2.295 Fr 1 2.296 I 2.32 I 3 57 i 2.295 i $2.30 i 2.35 2 11MI 12 C==C i 12e I I I { 1 I 96959 1.30 I .93 I 82652 I .8049 I 83 1 . i 1 I I' I I 3 1300001 195 aartE "I- i NIB 1 98 I I DQdVE1flt I 1. 1 W 1 2. 70-84 DAYS I 70-54 DAYS I 77 DAYS I 2. 88 VO 1 2. 10-12 kfZ 12. 10-12 VW 1 3. 3 DAYS 1 I 1 1 I I 2. 14 WKS ` 3. 7054 DAYS 1 1 3. 4.6 WS 1 3. 4-6 WO i 3. 4-6 No ! ! I i I 1, cAStX ac I 1. me 12, Tom= I FIFaa I { 1. CAR 1 23, WA 4 23,P~S i 1 3. MDUA I z. pIRU I ALCAN rte I I I j 13. Mani i 1 I 1.1 I I I I ! i IrraCe nm TILLI nm I 1 ` i I I { B ~0 r~"+E= TIM I I I { S { I 1 I 6.27 ; I I 1 I I I 1 I OMWCE 7" 1 1 t 1 { { ~ I I 1 1 I I I { I B.20 I I I I I 1 i 1 1 F 4 j TO: Mayor and Members of the City Counail FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTi BID #1268 - OILS AND GREASES Council approve award of annual bid wit 2 opt ° w for oils and greases to the lowest unit price bidder, Mid American Corp l I# I I I 1 1 18 110 w OIL DRUM I 130.35 DR I# I *==map 1 11 Immw= COL 1102.30 DA 12 IDM" 1 141.90 D8 .87 C 1 19 110 W Qit. QUARTS 1490 I 13 1156 -40 1 13`#.20 DR .89 (V I 110150 W on .00 14 IVA= FLUID 1 144.65 DR 15.70 PAIL i 1III 121~H GR> AS LM 1 1 198 TIN I { I 1 15 l'rRat~s. ~ ~ 144.65 2x6.80 DR W I law OEM .98 no I 16 IPS a= I 1141CHAS53 aFM 198.40 DR 17 Imm ai(Nai-CCta) i 207.98 --~1 I_1 1----"~'- 1~1 for the purbchase of e used ed au by thtoeiYe and This bid is Pleat ! l equipment oils and greases to be Maintenanoe Division. aecR0i1Np: Tabulation sheet, Maintenance* CTE>Zs Clest I rrL15L3u►a~ cram *MpACT: Fleet Maintenance aooount 714-025-8500-8710. i a Respect ully submitted: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared byi ! Nams: Mee arden Titles Buyer Approved: Name: Denise Harp Title: Senior MH/3h 175.DOC . F ( DID 0 1P68 I I I 1 I I I f I I I I E I I I 1 DID Narg 011.15 GIE1 TS 114AU N FMB I BUJ MY ON. 1 14'I.`XX: OIL I I<a WNiF OIL DMA M WST, I WXEY 011, I ('011, )IL f FIID ;1g;JITCAII I OIL I I I I I I low"Is 1 CM. ) tr~1;'v DreJn 7••30.91 I I I I I I i ! Q II (fly I JIM Pf5 IFECII I MICOR I vU10R I vnwn I VRlCOR 1 vuwn I YFIIX)R I YR100A I vFienon I I I I IrMRAUISC On. I 121.05 DR 1 2.51 OAL I 1U.OO DR 1 143.39 DR 1 130,09 DR 1 111,10 DR I A6,30 DFI 1 102.30 DR I 2 I € DVMUI1 I 155.05 DR 1 3.13 Gel, 1 191.00 DII 1 1911,20 DR 1 174.35 DR 1 1119,60 DR 1 176 5i5 JAR 1 141,90 DR 1 I 1 1 .98 QT 1 3.55 CAI. 1 13,50 CS 1 13,00 M 1 144104 1 N/B I 1,0475 ar I 87 QT 1 1 I I I I 1 t I i I 3 € € 15E1 -40 I 162.52 DR I 2.97 CAL € 185.00 DR I 179,85 DR ! 166,65 DR I 151.5 DR I 187,00 DR I 135,20 DR I I I I 1.011 QT I 3.57 GAL I 134,0 CS I 13.20 CS i 13.11 CS I In I 1.27 Qr I .69 QT I ! I I € I I I I 1 i 4 I I 111ACIUR F-L FID I 164.71 DR 1 3.13 GAL € 197.00 DR I 200.E DR ( 164.45 DR 1 159.50 DR 1 186.45 DR ) 114.65 DR I I 1 18.35 PAIL 1 4.18 GAL 1 * 24.00 PAIL I * 20,90 PAIL 1 " 18.40 PAIL I N/B 1 20.75 PAIL 1 a 15.70 PAIL € I I i I f I I I I 1, ! 5 1 I Mitt. F!.UID I 151.94 DR I 3.04 GAL I 191.00 DR I 1&'+,15 DR I 174.35 DR I 150.15 DR I 176.55 DR ! 144.65 DR f 1 .93 qr 1 3A GAL I 13,50 CS 1 12,7u M 1 13.06(3 I H/A € .9925 QT 1 11/8 € I I I f I I # I I 1 I 6 I I Ps FLUID } 155.29 DR 1 3.13 M I 220.00 DR I 11/A # 5.35 GAL I 149.60 DR 1 213.40 DR 1 206.80 DR 1 I I I 99 Qr I 3.55 GAL I N/A I N/A 111" (5 0A. PAIL)I 11/13 I .97 (12 CZ) 1 w/o 1 I I I I I 1 I i 1 7 1 I Irm on(trit-miD) 1 194.64 DR 1 3.49 GAL 1 185.OODR 1 200.25 DR 1 328.35 DR I 220,00 DR 1 184.80 DR i 207.90 DR I I I I I I I I I 7 8 I 10 11 OIL DIM I "x150,92 DR I 2.82 GAL ( 175.00 DR I 173.15 DR I 198.00 DR ( 158.40 DR I 182.60 DR 1 130.35 DR I ~ I I I I I 1 I I I 1 9 1 I 10 IJ OIL QOARJS 1 N/A I 3.42 (JAI. I 13.50 Qr I 12.95 Cs 1 12.57 C3 I NIB 1 1.17 t(r 1 .87 QT I I I I I I I I I I I 101 1 50 N OIL I 163.39 DR 1 2.82 aAL I 175.00 DR 1 176.60 DR 1 198,00 DR 1 172,15 DR I 162.60 DR # 141,90 no I i I 1*" 16.46 PAIL 1 3.42 CIAL I - I N/A QT 1 12.57 Cs 1 J1/H I 1,17 Qr ( FIAT I ( I I I I I I i I € i 111 I 90 N GEAR un I 125.18 DR I 3.84 OAL 1 199.00 DR I 217.00 DR I 228.00 DR I 202.96 DR 1 218.00 DR 1 172,00 DR 1 1 I GL - s 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I I € ! 121 1 1J B Ow" 1 1.02 n1BB 1 B5 FMI I 59.00/60 I 19.40/24 1 1,44 •JUDIi I NIB I 1.065 SUBS 1 .98 911813 1 I I I I I I 1 # 131 1 aF.4R OFF" 1 .77 RIM 1 85 au I 59.00/6o 1 19.40/24 ~ 1.44 nM I NIB ( K43 I .98 I= I E I 1 I I I I I 1 141 1 CIL= aWASE I 61.o6 DR 1 .7675 0 1 84.oo 1 85.80 M 1 100.80 DR 1 81.60 DR I 87.00 DR € 98.4.0 DR I 1 I I I I i I I € I I I "N/A 2 GAL I " N/A 2 GAL N/A 2 GC 8.75/2 GAL 11121.90RS CF 3 1 I OWA 2 a& € "N/tl 2 (JAL I I I I N/A QR' I N/A Or I N/A Qr 1 I 2 GAL I I N/A Q'r I NA3 qr I I I Ca,IYF7flt 1 6 DAYS I 1 DAY 1 3 DAYS I 1 DAY I 1 DAY 11 2 DAYS 1 2 DW 1 2 DAYS 1 1 i' I I I"' 17,03/5 G% I 1 f "x8.26/12 CZ f IVA Qr I 1 I # $~o DR UT. t I € 1 I F 2 + ~1s i P ti 265IL-3/3689 i it NO. FOR THG BIDS AND p).<OVIJMIG CC~IPETITIVL IiiPROVt.liEITS. YP,UV1llIAiG~ AN ORDINANCE ACCEP'fF PUBLIC WORKS OR AND PROVIDING FOR AWARD OF CONTRACTS THFaEFOa; THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR and tabulated EFFECTIVE DATE. solicited, received works or City has of public and WHEREAS, the for the construction of state la ,,q etitive bids with the procedures comp in accordance Improvements city ordinances; and designated eml',Ioyee has city a ; e the herein described bids are Che the City llanag public WOVIl S WHEREAS, recommended that of the p orals for the construction bid prop invitation, rec,s jved espd in the bid lowest responsible, bids goC,j TILEKEFORE) or improvements described and plans and specifications therefore; THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: for the THE COUNCIL OF ompetitive bids I That the folloiring c as described in the ,LCTI.ON improvements ecifications on ublic works or 11 or plans and sp construct ono „Bid proposals Agent file d Invitations f the City)s Purchasil1l; hereby accepted in the Office 01 the hereto, are file bid number onsib approved as le bids; to the being the lowest resp Phsr?' coNTi! kACT-Olt tix~n NurS,~ aae asz cw go, } the of above That the acceptance and approval the City contract olic { I SECTION II. construction of such pc such -~----h-~s shalt notttonbidtfora apProved, until compel t arson submitting and the No and orksh orp improvament~i herein accepted eci fied itt tice require)ilents sp w shall comply with all person 'I i . I M 1 1 44r r S I 1 SECTION II. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered frems of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities and, for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid Proposals, and related documents. SECTION III. That should the City and persons submitting approver and -accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the arritten contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions, specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained in the.Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein approved and ! accepted. SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbere tems of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein, f I SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of X1991. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: I ' JENNIFER WALTERS, C Ty SECRETARY I APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: I PAGE TWO t 4 DATE: August 20, 1991 TO: Mayor and Membera of the City Council FROM; Lloyd V. Harrell, City Viianaeer t ' SUP ~.T: BID X1267 - LOMA DEL REY DRAINAGE gj.Q0M_1DAT12A1 We recommend this bid be award d to the low bidder for the alternate bid, Sunmount Corp. in e total J amount of $846,432.00. 5.909A$Ys This bid is for all materials and labor to extend drainage from Lane Street to Pecan Greek. existing This 1 will alleviate future flooding of Kingfisher Oriole and t4olla oaisley culvertlinrplace not will allow w the o0ntr two 42" to 48" pipe. Tabulation sheet, memorandum Jerry Clarlc 8-8-91, 1}AP,i4SiB9SlSip E.fl~4flAI~~1-_~~E9HTMFIiT-__x.13---Scg4l1P~.___9~.EECT~12s Entiinesring Department and citizens who reside in the affaoted area. d ay Funds for this project will come fora bond ' un for r drainage improvements tk436-020-0090-9108. funds s Respect u11y submitted: Lloyd V, Harrell City Manager Approveds r Names- Denise Title; Senior Buyer DH/jh 177.DOC I ~Y 1 i I BID 1267 I I I I I f ! 1 I I I i I f ! I I I I I I I I BITAIWE 117E DEL Fm I JACCly PUBLIC It•WIIO SINACOLA I CBS ! SUIl1(Ilf 1 vim JCI1fL9`Jtl E PATE & PALE ! CiIUX C pnnltln~,>; I & aW I tiirC WTICAL I CORP. I CCIZIRUCI ON I adfE11PRI.SE5 1 MJS91ii1C ON 1 I I I I I I mil JULY 18, 1991 I I I I I l ! I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I d I Ilui CEJCRIP ON I V13COR I VULMOR I VMR I VE: WR I VUIWa I VUWR 1 vklmOA I _1, I I I I I I I ! I I I ! I I I I I I 1 I I I I E 1 I TWAL 1 $1,120,371,01 1 "944,575.16 1 $1,109,216.00 1 $1,033,599.00 I $990059.00 1 N/B I $1,1X1,7111.00 1 I I I ! I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I ( 2 I ALTS MIE I X5,383.30 ! ,;886,103.94 1 $938,813.00 I $846,432.00 I IUB 1 $979,553.20 1 $909035.00 1 ! I I ! I ! I I I I I ! ! I I I I ! 3 1 BID W Z I YES YES ! YES I YES I YES ! YES I 1 I 1 ! ! ICAST IN LIEU Cr I I ! I I ! ! f CaMM15 PIPE I I E ! I I E I I I I ! I I I I I 1 I ,I I I I I I I I I ! ! I I I I 1 I ! I ! I I I I I I ! 1 I I ! 1 ! I I ! ! 1 I I 1 k 1 i i 1 , i 1 city of DENTON? TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76101 / TELEPHONE (817)5668200 _Y MEMORANDUM DATE: August 8, 1991 I TO: Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent , FROM: Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering & Transportation SUBJECT: Approval of Bid #1261 Loma Del Rey Drainage The Loma Del Rey project was redesigned to postpone the detention pond ($100,000 bid price) while adding an alternative bid for a box culvert to substitute for the double 42" to 48" pipes. Easement acquisitions required extending the pipes"from the end of Lane Street down to Pecan Creek. The bid price of $846,432 submitted for the project is now very acceptable so the redesign was well worth the effort. i The proposed system will handy the existing drainage runoff that is currently creating the flooding problems. Runoff will ! be intercepted prior to reaching Kingfisher, Oriole, and Mockingbird south of Paisley. The detention pond will be constructed in the next one to two years with City crews. I Funding for this project is adequate to complete the drainage system, fund capitalized labor charges, acquire easements, and provide $40,000 so the street Department can repave all of Mockingbird and La,ie Streets. Oriole Street has funding of $150,000 which will be available for the concrete portion. of the bid to be r,~ceived in about one month. The water line is to be constructed first by Water and Sewer crews beginning in the immediate future. City of Denton street crews will rebuild Oriole and pave with asphaltic concrete pavement. The low bidder on Loma Del Rey is Sunmount who has an excellent ; reputation for performance is this area. We recommend the bid be awarded so the project can start at the earliest date, The neighborhood is anxiously awaiting construction of this crucial , system, rer Y ar 0998E Y sx,_.aurtt H 9i\NPd0CS\Ia Xr0kQ. l I j ORDINANCE NO. j AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING THE 1991 APPRAISAL ROLL AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 1 THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS; SECTION Y . That the City Council hereby approves the 1991 Appraisal Roll of the City of Denton, Texas in the amount of $1,896,810,033 assessed valuation, based on the Certified Appraisal Roll as approved by the Appraisal Review Board of the Denton Central Appraisal District. SECTIQN II. That this ordinance small become effective im- mediately upon its passage and approval. i PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1991. i t BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BYe APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY i BY: a 4 V. CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Mayor and Members of the City Council To: FROM: [,loyd V. [carrell, City Manager SUBJECT: No parking ordinance for the north side of Edwards Street from Avenue D to Avenue E RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval SUMMARY: E i This ordinance is part of the request from UNT to amend the annual agreement for traffic enforcement around the campus. BACKGROUND: Edwards street is very narrow and only provides access to UNT properties. UNT is the sole owner of property on the street. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Police, Traffic Control, UNT, and Students FISCAL IMPACT: Four "no parking" signs costing $200.00 F 0773E A L tai...... . t CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 MEMORANDUM DATE: August 12, 1991 TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager FROM: Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering & Transportation SUBJECTS No parking ordinance - Edwards street The annual traffic enforcement agreement with UNT is being amended. Several changes in ownership, parking lots being ; constructed, and traffic patterns have created the need for an amendment. This ordinance would provide for no parking on the north side of Edwards between Avenue D and Avenue E. Edwards is a very narrow street that runs only for one block which establisher it as residential access only. UNT owns all properties and establishes parking based on it's policies, Jer y la p'x } 0998E k Al\i ` jHY(`a L L! liiS iA6lj7 r F F I CTSSC MINUTES l i August 12, 1991 I I i ITEM 412 REQUEST FOR NO PARKING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF EDWARDS STREETt Iwuchukwu presented the request. He said, this is the same type situation as was presented on Chestnut. The University of North Texas requests no parking on the north side of Edwards Street between Avenue D and Avenue E. All the property on both sides of Edwards Streets are owned by the university. t This street has no curb and gutter. Removing parking would improve , traffic flow and enable the Trolley to maneuver with less chance of accidents, It will enhance the traffic management plan in the area. STAFF R'ACOMMENDED1 Approval t COMMISSIONERSt Kay made a motion to accept staff recommendation. Gore seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. ! 1 i { i E A j T-. t }4.`n9 r 1 i ,A :5 a CTSSC MEMO August 6, 1991 !j page 5 I i The DISD also proposes that the signs be returned to their original locations ..upon completion of renovations in 1992-93. Please see letter attached from Gilbert Bernstein, DISD Ansistant Superintendent for Administrative Services. Staff recommenda approval. 1 I ITEM 10 TRUCX ROUTE ORDINANCE: The ordinance was tabled on July 16, 1991, because of the issue of truck owners taking their cabs to their homes. The council was concerned about the rights of truckers to reach their homes using the cab only. The Legal Department has rewritten Section 18.54 of the ordinance to allow the cabs to be driven home. Truck tractor combinations are still prohibited on residential streets from 2000 p.m to 7:00 a.m. City Council considered the revised ordinance on August 6 and 1 approved it. ITEM #11 REQUEST FOR NO PARKING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CHESTNUT STREET i The University of *North Texas (UNT is requesting no parking on the north side of Chestnut Street between Avenue D and Avenue E. Currently, there is no parkirq on the south side. This location is among the areas under the control of the university for regulation of parking. It is an area that is susceptible to congestion due to the student activities around it dormitortes, physical education (PE) activities, gym, etc. Removing parking from this section of Chestnut street will improve traffic management and safety in the area. UNT owns all the property adjacent to subject location. Staff recommends approval. i ITEM 112, REQUEST FOR NO PARKING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF EDWARDS STREETS The University of North Texas is requesting no parking on the north side of Edwards Street between Avenue D and Avenue Be This is a narrow street with no curb and gutter. Currently, cars park on the dirt portion on the north side beyond the edge of pavement. Removing parking in this area would improve traffic flow and minimize chances of acoidents. This location is also among areas under the control of the university for regulation of A Also parking* the u aivereit owns all the property on both aides of Edwards Street e. Staff recommends approval. j , 17 s. f w/ il' i.. 1~ ( J I . s i i D r C 1 a I m o s m cn ; Z 8 AVE. fi:iSF}'L g 1 UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS Parking and Transportation I August 5, 1991 Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission: City Hall i Denton, Tx, 16201 Request for no parking on north side of Edwards Street Dear commissioner, nd t The University of North Texas is requesting no parking Stret thee north stile of five(5)iparking~ a foes rki Edwards street between t oearsDtonPass, This Edwards barely wide enough for on the south the that enter or exit from Edwards Street. The block has no parking e side and when vehicles park parallel Removing parking onathe northvside,pwouldnmako dirt section of the arts ~ traffic a lot safer. The University of North Texan is the sole owner of the property adjacent to the subject area. Sincerely, -7~ Mike AmadoY Captain of Parking and Transportation. MA/jc ec; Chief Jackson i { 1 Y N v ~ ~ g;xpclacs\eixard.o I i 1 ORDINANCE No. TEXAS, PROHIBITING THE PARKING FROM AVENUE E TO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, STREET! OF VEHT.CLES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF EDWARDS E. PROVIDING A PEN NOT PROVIDING A S VERAAR3IL AND DECLARING AN EFFE TIVEADATE. AVENUE Di TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED D I THE COUNCIL OF THE Clmy OF DENTON HEREI3y ORDAINS no notice thereof, S C 0 I, When signs are erected vthe following street or person shall park a vehicle at anytime upon of Genl;on, to-wit: portion thereof, in the City The north side of Edwards Street, from Avenue E to Avenue ' D. paragraph, sen- SFC~ TION II, That if any sects-on, subsection, or application 1 tence, clause, Phrase or word in this ordinan, any court is hel invalid mstance thereof to any person or circu holding shall not affect by the vali- competent jurisdiction, such and the City , it would ity of the remaining portions of this ordinaclares of Denton, Texas, hereby de such invalidityhave en- oil of the City ortions despite any anted such remaining p rovision of this on who shall viola* te a pr xe uire- the q i C~nmrON Imo. Any pars1 therewith or with any of th , ordinanc~fails to comp Y a Pine not exceeding mints thereof , or of a pe rmit or certificate issued thereunder, shall guilty of a misdemeanor punishable pe Each such person shall be deemed onion Two Hundred Dollars ($200,00) nse for each and ever guilty of a separate of violation of t;\is ordinance a is committed, thereof during which any siich violations such per- 1 or continued, and upon conviction of any be punished within the limits above4 son shall become That this ordinance shalo and the City Secretary teen 5(14) d~ ysfrom the date of its passag , eoted to cause the caption of this ordinance to be is hereby dir ~ ice in the onDenton Record-Chronicle, the official lofne~hi3 cw ithin ten (10) day lished ub T . +paper of the City of Dent , exas, w date of its passage, 19y1. Clay of PASSED AND APPROVED this the g0'TGEBERRY, MAYOR . A R1thi+t' rf:NttM:t Y I 1 ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY i BY: - APPROVED AS TO LEGAL ITY ATTORNEY I DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCHr CITY BY. 'I i j i y y Page 2 r CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: No parking on Chestnut Street for the north side between Avenue D and Avenue E RECOMMENDATION: Approve the ordinance : SUMMARY: This ordinance is part of the 1991 requests from UNT to amend the annual parking agreement with the City of Denton North Texas is the sole owner of property. BACKGROUND: i 1 Chestnut street is very narrow and is a major access to the j western parking lots at UNT. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED Police, Traffic Control, UNT, and Students FISCAL IMPACT: Four "no parking" signs costing $200 F E . 0773E r f of lfNfUN TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 CITY o ► MXMORANDUM 1 ~ s i ti Dl+'tE: August 12, 1991 TO; Lloyd Harrell, City Manager Jetty Clark, Director of Engineering & Transportation FROM. i SUBJECT: No parking ordinance -Chestnut street ' Y The annual traffic enforcement agreement with UOT is being 1 rking lo amended. Several changes in ownership, p constructed, and traffic patterns have created the need for an, ( amendment, 4 parking on the north side j This ordinance would provide for : of Chestnut from Avenue D to Avenue E, chestnut is a very narrow street that is now used as the mayor access to the western parking lots for UNT. We recommend approval of the ordinance, i i ,ter y lar a 0998E ~ 1 i i I _ }f~Lil}S4J¢ I UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS Parking and Transportation August 5, 1991 i Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission , City Hall S Denton, Tx. 76201 ; Request for no parking on north side of Chestnut Street f I Dear Commissioner, 1 The University of North Texas is requesting no parking on the north side of Chestnut Street between Avenue D to Avenue E. Chestnut Street has no, parking` on the south side. This section of Chestnut Street is narrow and experiences enormous congestion. ; Traffic coming off of East and Guest 35, travels north on Avenue E and east on i Chestnut to the main campus area. Removing parking on the north side would make traffic a lot safer, 'i The University of North Texas is the sole owner of the property adjacent to the subject area, Sincerely, Mike Amador j Captain of Parking and Transportation 1 MA/j c cc: Chief Jackson l 'i i i i ~ FT7Y:a" qi• ,r . 777, ~ r Y CTSSC MINUTES August 120 1991 ITEM SIDE OF CHESTNUT STREETS III RE VEST FOR NO PARKING ON THE NORTH IwUCb1kwu presented the request. He eaidr the University of North s no parking on the north side Of f is k no t Texas request parking eon between Avenue D and Avenue E. Currentlyr the south aide. Chestnut is basically a narrow street in it very active part Of the university. the The property on both sides of the Street There are no adverse university. The Trolley also uses the street, affects to residents or students. STAFF RECOMMENDED. Approval COMMISSIONERS: Kay made a motion to accept staff reoommendation. White seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. t i, c S ; I CTSSC MEMO August 61 1991 page 5 She DISD also propose" that the signs be returned to their original locations attached nplPromn Gof r 12bertvati9e nstei ;992-DISD Y1Assistant etter Superintendent for Administrative Services. Staff recommends approval. ITEM 10 TRUCK ROUTE ORDINANCE! 1 The ordinance was tabled on July 16, 1991, because of the issue of truck owners taking their cabs to their homes. The Council was concerned about the rights of truckers to reach their homes using the cab only. The Legal Department has rewritten Section 18-54 of combinatire tractor the o din nseato ! allow the cabs to be driven home. Truck still prohibited on residential streets from 10!00 p.m to 7:00 a.m. ; f City council considered the revised ordinance on August 6 and approved it. ITEM 11 REQUEST- FOR NO PARKING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CHESTNUT STREETI The University of North Texas (UNT is requesting no paGking on the north side of Chestnut Street between Avenue D and Avenue E• Currently, theee is no parking on the south side. i This location is among the areas under the control of the university for regulation of parking. It is an area that is suaceptible to congestion due to the student activities around it drfrom physical education (PE) activities, gym, etc. Removing parking this section of Chestnut Street will improve traffic management and safety in the area. UNT owns all the property adjacent to subjeut location. Staff recommends approval. ITEM 12 REOUEST.FOR NO PARKING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF EDHARDS STREETI The University of North Texas is requesting no parking on the north aide of Edwards Street between Avenue D and Avenue Be This is a narrow street with no'curb and gutter. Currently, care park on the dirt portion on the north aide beyond the edge of f pavement. Removing parking in this area would improve traffic flow and minimize chances of accidents. This location is also among areas under the control of the univezsity for regulation of { parking. Also the univero{ty owns all the property on both sides of Edwards Streetso staff recommends approval. t f, k FnUT rn D MILL* v ER M n fln rn ~n F1 8 AVE. e:wpdocs\chest.u M ORDINANCE NO. t AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF VEHICLES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CHESTNUT STREET, FROM AVENUE E TO AVENUE D; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT 1 TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. When signs are erected g'ving notice thereof, no person shall park a vehicle at anytime upon the following street or portion thereof, in the City of Denton, to-wit: The north side of Chestnut street, from Avenue E to Avenue D. SECTION 11. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sen- tence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the valid- ity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the city Coun- cil of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have en- acted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION III. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the require- ments thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00). Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such violations such per- son shall be punished within the limits above. SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective four- teen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official news- paper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1991. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR t tiaaara• l l , ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERSi CITY SECRETARY 10 BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY ::tnu tom-- BY .f f E { I 3 j t { i i , Page 2 RAY] 00 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT the Ci Y Council Mayor and Members 0f T0: City Manaf - r Lloyd V. Harrell, FROM: ent UNT Parking jurisdiction AV _m SUBJECT: RECOMMFNDAT ION Approval Ga submitted SUMMARY" rdinance is the procedural f0ll0wup to the The e e enclnclos soed apo proved by City Council on August 6, 1991 resoluti BACKGROUND he agreement are used assed by the Ownership of the property All the streets for UNTO activities. UNT. exclusiveely this area is also owned by surrounding I OR GROUPS AFFECTED: ~ PROGRAMSe DEPARTMENTSI students, Police, Traffic Control UNT, FISCA IMPACT: L None i { E j 1 i 0773E , ~ s. j . CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DEN TON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 5668200 MEMORANDUM ' DATE: August 14, 1991 TO: Lloyd Harrelle City Manager FROM: . Jerry Clarkr Engineering & Transportation o £ FR SUBJECT: UNT Parking Jurisdiction Agreement The enclosed ordinance is the followup to the resolution passed on August 6 by the City Council. We are following procedures as per Legal to formally amend Section 18-152. We recommend approval of the ordinance as submitted. The two no parking issues contained in the agreement will also be on the August 20, 1991 City Council agenda. I rrr ar j 0998E I k i S t A g1 9:%wpdxs\urtpk90 J ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SEC. 18-152 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE ' CITY OF DENTON TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL PORTIONS OF CITY STREETS AD- JACENT TO PROPERTY CONTROLLED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS TO BE SUBJECT TO THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNIVERSITY FOR REGULATION OF PARKING; AND PROV1.D1f'i~ FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. } THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: S CTION I. That Sec. 18-152, ''Streets under university juris- diction; parking restrictions" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby amended and paragraph (a) of said section shall hereafter be and read as follows: 860., 18-152. Streets under university jurisdictiont parking restrictions. (a) The portion of the streets for which the governing board of the University of North Texas has been delegated jurisdiction and Ih E control pursuant to section 18-151 are as follows; Avenue A, east side, from Mulber~:y street to Maple Street; Avenue A, west side, from Mulberry Street to Eagle Drive; ' Avenue B, both sides, from Maple street to Eagle Drive; t Avenue Co east side, from Mulberry Street to Highland Street and from Maple Street to Eagle Drive; Avenue C, west side, from Sycamore Street to Highland Street and from Maple street to Eagle Drive; Avenue D, east side, from Hickory Street to Mulberry Street; Avenue D, east side, from Prairie Street to Highland Streett Avenue D, west side, from Chestnut Street to Maple Street' t Avenue D, west side, from Sycamore Street to Chestnut Street; Central Street, east side, from Highland Street to Maple Street' Chestnut Street, north side, from Avenue A to Welch Streetf 1 Chestnut Street, north side from Atrernie D to Avenue E; Edwards street, north side, from Avenue E to Avenue D; s 1 } rth side, from Avenue E to Welch Street; Highland Street, no roxi- Highland Street, south side, £TQinAWidened areat only, and I mately three hundred (300) feet, from fifty (50) feet We in widened area oontwo lylhundred (200) feat east of Avenue C, from th erty line north side, the university prop C to Maple Street, two hundred (200) feet east of Avenue approximately Avenue A; street to Welch Maple Straet, north side, from Central street; ; ~ street, north side, from Avenue D to Avenue C; Mulberry west approxi- } Streetr north side, from Avenue C, Prairie 400) feet; mately four hundred south side, from Avenue E to Avepus c and Prairie street, from Avenue A to Welch Street; A to Welch Streets from Avenue de s, l sycamore Street, both s i four hundred' Sycamore Street , ue north side, approximately (400) feet from Aven C to AfromeAvenue E to Avenue D. south side, sycamore Street, 0 That this ordinance shall become effective im- i madielY upon its passage and approval. 1991. day of PASSED AND APPROVED this the BOB" CASTLEIFERRY, MAYOR ATTESTS JENNIFER WALLS, CITY SECRETARY BY: ORMS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL CITY ATT008Y DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, B`!' l:}I. t. pi A eiupdocs%untpking ~f r AGREEMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON i This Agreement is made between the City of Denton, Texas, j hereinafter referred to as "the City" and the University of North Texas, formerly known as North Texas Sate University and here- inafter referred to as "the University". 1 RECITALS On August 31, 1981, the parties entered into a contract in which the City, through its city Council, delegated to the University the authority to regulate the parking of vehicles on certain portions of public streets in the City of Denton lying , within or immediately adjacent to the property controlled by the j University. The parties now find a modification of the provisions of the prior contract is needed to include additional p(, tions of public streets in the City of Denton. AGREEMENT The second paragraph of the prior contract is modified to include additional portions of public streets in the City of Denton. The City, through its City Council, hereby delegates to f the University the authority to regulate the parking of vehicles on the following public streets lying within or immediately adjacent to the property controlled by the University, to-wit: Avenue D, east side, from Hickory Street to Mulberry Street) Avenue D, west side, from Sycamore Street to Chestnut Street; Central street, east side from Highland Street to Maple Streets Chestnut Street, north side from Avenue D to Avenue E. Edwards Street, north side, from Avenue E to Avenue Df kk Maple Street, north side, from central Street to Welch streett 'Mulberry Street, north side, from Avenue D to Avenue C1 Sycamore Street, north side, approximately Four Hundred (400) feet from Avenue C to Avenue DI and Sycamore street, south side, from avenue R to Avenue D. .z 1161 , RY. B:i'YId,Q I 1!rFtiNIA , It is expressly agreed by the parties that this Agreement is 1 supplemental to the contract of August 31, 1981, which is made a j part by reference, and all terms, conditions, and provisions of the ( original contract are to apply to this Agreement and are made a part of this Agreement as though expressly rewritten, incorporated, and included herein. .r j ~ 1991 SIGNED AND EXECUTED this the J day of , by the appropriate representatives of the City and a University and effective upon all signatures to this Agreement. 7CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS By BY. MAYOR BOB CASTLEBERRY~ Cw ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CIT SECRETARY i - y BY?ROVED AP S TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY By. i f 3 PAGE 2 1 !'fY REF C+,( ly i' f g:wpdocs\untr 1 RESOLUTION NO.1-~ AGREEMENT BETWEEN A RESOLUTIIONDAUTHORIZINTHEHUN ERSITX OFENORTH TEXAS FOR THE DELE- M ON ADDITIONAL PORTIONS OF THE CITY OON AND TO REGULATE GATION OF AUTHORITY PROPERTY.PCONTROLLED BY THE UNIVERSITY; AND ' CITY STREETS ADJACENT TO X PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY aRESOLVES: uthorized to execute an SECTI_OA-i That the Mayor is hereby of North agreement between the City of Denton and the University ruate park- Texas delegating to the University the auth streets ority adjacent to property - 1 ing on additional t University,f city portions controlled by S C N ? That this resolu royal hall become effective im- upon its passage and app mediately 1991. PASSED AND APPROVED this the aay of ACA LEBERRY, MYOR ATTESTI CITY SECRETARY JENNIFER WALTERS, BY; i ~I APPR VED AS TO LEGAL FORM )ATTORNEY E DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, r BYt rii.~a`, \ f t ~;tf.AP4 4I/i40 THE STATE Or TEXAS s COUNTY Or OENTOM O II.MCT f I This contract is made between the City of nenton, Tex&,, I~erulnafter refsrred to as "the City" and North Texas State university, hereinafter referred to as "the University", the j effective date of the ountreot being AurGst 31, lq@1. The City, through its City Council, hereby delegates to the University the authority to regulate the parking of vehioles on the followl Denton public streets running through or Immediately adjacent to property owned or oecuQsed ,,nd controlled by the university, to-wits (1) Avenue A, both sides. from rhestnut street to hest prairie streets (2) Avenue At both oldest from Highland Street to Maple Street) (3) Avenue Do both sides, from Ninkory street to Mulberry Drive) (4) Avenue D, both sides, from Maple Street to Eagle Street) (S) Central Street# west side, Eton Highland Street to Maple Street) (R) Central. streott east vide, south from Highland street opproainaheltt 300 feat) (7) Avenue Co west side-t from Mulberry Street to Nighland Strout and tCOM Map1s Rttert to piyls Strout) (1). Avenue Co seat side, tzar 11ulborrr Street to eels street 191 Avenue s00 east side, from „LN*Ccv street to Chestnut stresto 4101 Avenue D, vest sldelp fcom 11191slane street to Maple stteetr (11) Mulbeitr' Street* both old*** from Av*MW R to Averse so l (121 Mulberry Strout, south. sift, west.,appeonimsetely I) 400 foot ICON Avenue Co ` (13) sycamore street, north sldoo !toes Avenue D to ! Avenue C) 414) sycamore Street, odgth sidot approglaustuly 400 ; feat west lrnse Avenu• is 1 l.J'.'• Yif'llJ:ll'y 1{ ( ~Y 1 (15) Chestnut street, both elder, from AVonUe p to Avenun C, from Avonut A to Welch skrent, 1 116) tt WelAetch Pro Stririe strnst, both sides, rrnm AvenuA A to eets 1171 Welcha trsset Highland Street, fenuthAvasidpi, Mu4 fP' to rom Avenue a to approximately I feet ease of i Central streatt 200 (18) Maple strest, both sides, from Avenue r, to central 9trsslr t On the ebovi etraata, th* Itnivereity Is authorized (1) to nAAign And regulate parkinq AniaAS for ltv uie, (o) to charge and collect a fee from its personnel and students for pjrk(nq, (3) to prohibit parking, and (4) to nhnrge and cutlent a fqe for removing vehicles 'patkgd in violation of law or ordin a ace or in violation of a rule governing the parking of vehiclnn cdo tee! b p by the Boards of Magenta Of the University. Atl parking violations shall be filed In the Runiaipal court of tho city of onnton, Texas, The Citv agre*s to provide the UnivFral tV with a d male sQ packing tickets, at no exgens* to the i University* for the purpose o". nnloroing parking regulations In hill the above dosaribed areas, it is further agreed that this contract dots not IIII (1) limit the police power of the city of its law asstoecomnt a 111risdtettoe, 171 render a campus pas" oretcor an e*ployer of the 4lty or entltl* a campus pease officer to caq►enaation from the City, or (3) restriat the power rig the s< ntwratt)r under other law. to enforce laws, oedinana*s, or rules regulating traffic or parking. The terra of this contract shall he for a period of one year, 0.4ffeoteve September 1, 19810 and t*rminnlinq on h 4us! 31, 1482. This contract shall be aatomaticaltr tonewebte for sunUn.rniv#% periods of one-v+ar unless +ither part eiv Y OR Rlxlr (An) days Written nobles of tatminatton tn' the other Carty 11101n• P% thew how)inninq of Ih0 rNagvAble heap, I 111 'g~,r1 5 ` 9YUMED AND WCUTID this the 26th Aay o! Auqustr 1.981, by the APPOOPeiate COPresentati"s of the City and the UnivetsitVt ,fictive date of the agceemsnt to be August 11, 1981. the *p CITY Or DENTONf TEAS NORTH TEXAS STATE 7NIVEAAITY BY! hY! v~-.~ , ' / V1 i ATTEaTt L ' CITY SZCRNTART CITY or DEN?oN, TxxAlt h9FROVED AS TO LEGAL fORHt C. J. 1AILOh, JR.. Cl" ATTORNEY CITY or oSNToN, TEXAS Bit ATTORNSY GIMShAL Of TEXAS 191 • ' ' 11 1 i j Rq a; G j CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager DATE: August 20, 1991 i SUBJECT: Amendment of Schedule A of the GDAC-City Contract RECOMMENDATION That the City Council pass this ordinance amending schedule A of the agreement between the City of Denton and the Greater Denton Arts Council for the Campus Theater. This amendment clarifies several provisions of the agreement. It represents no new negotiated utility amounts and no additional fiscal commitments by the City. BACKGROUND: The City of Denton and the GDAC signed an agreement in October 1990 which was negotiated between a City council sub-committee of Jim Alexander and Bob Gorton and representatives of the GDAC regarding the Campus Theater, The City agreed to pay utility expenses based on consumption amounts and a portion of maintenance expenses for the old Campus Theater which GDAC purchased. Utility consumption amounts were figured for electric, water, wastewater, sanitation, and natural gas. SUMMARY: Two revisions to Schedule A of the GDAC-City contract for the j Campus Theater are needed. Schedule A outlines the annual and { monthly consumption for utilities estimated for this facility. The first revision to schedule A deals with the demand charge for electricity. The original schedule calls for 100 KWH. The revised s~:nedule reads 100 KW. A clarifying statement regarding facility j charges was also added since this was not clearly stated in the I original schedule. The second revision deals with natural gas consumption. The original natural gas figure was incorrect. The usage figure was not stated in terms of the measurement of gas, Gas consumption is measured in hundred cubic feet, CCF. The original figure was also too low. This was a miscalculation and needs to be revised. The backup from which thi,, schedule was derived had incorrectly l submitted both the demand figure in terms of KWH, not KW, and the ~.rr. !'liFdU. 1r I yy C f i City Council Report August 20, 1991 Page Two low gas figure. Gas amounts are generally quoted in terms of CCF. However, because the measurement term was not stated the figure was artificially low since it did not reflect hundreds of cubic feet. PROGRMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: ! ! Greater Denton Arts Council, Denton Community Theater, and the } citizens of Denton. FISCAL IMPACT': This represents no new fiscal commitments for the City. The amount budgeted for the utilities portion of this agreement totals $21,000. Please let me know if I can provide additional information. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Lloyd V. Harrell r City Manager Prepared by; Catherine E. Tuck Administrative Ausistant i i r ~ e;wpdocslgdaco ORDINANCE 140. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND GREATER DENTON ARTS COUNCIL; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on October 15, 1990, the City of Denton (City) and ` Greater Denton Arts Council (GDAC) entered into an agreement providing for the payment of funds by the city to GDAC for pro- viding the community services described therein) and WHEREAS, the parties wish to revise ochedule °A" to such agree- ment; NOW, THEREFORE, i THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: Sz That the City Council hereby approves the amend- E ments to the Agreement as attached hereto, between the City of Denton and Greater Denton Arts Council. o- SECTION II. That the City Secretary is hereby directed to attach a copy of said Amendment to Ordinance 90-151 and to note on E said ordinance a statement that the Agreement has been amended. SECTION 11. That this ordinance shall become effective im- mediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1991. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: ' JENNIFER WALTERS, CV-sY JECRETARY ! BY. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: } t e ~ ~aaa~,a~a AMENDMENT OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND GREATER DENTON ARTS COUNCIL - j Recitals on October 15, 1990, the City of Denton (City) and Greater Denton t , Arts Council (GDAC) entered into an agreement, a copy of which is attached, providing for the payment of funds by the City to GDAC j f for providing the community services described therein, (Agree- ment). The parties wish to amend Schedule "A" for utility consump- tion attached to the Agreement to reflect revisions to Column III thereof. AGREEMENT I. I The parties agree to the amendment of Schedule "A" of the attached Agreement, to read as follows: I. II. IIIr UTILITY SERVICI ANNUAL CONSUMPTION MONTHLY USAGE Electricity 180,000 KWH 150000 KWH 100 KW (demand) Water 100,000 gallons 8,333 gallons Wastewater 80,000 gallons A,667 gallons Natural Gas 41062 CCF 339 COP On or before the 5th day of each month, CITY shall pay GDAC a sum equal to the utility billing for the consumption and facility charges for the utility services enumerated in Column 111. The CITY shall pay all regalar monthly charges from the CITY for removal of solid waste. II. Except for the amendment set forth in Article I hereof, the terms of the original Agreement of October 15, 1990, remain in full force and effect. Signed , 1991. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR 4 } RtiVk,Yg!y f ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: ~w i APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCHt CITY ATTORNEY ? BY: I i GREATER DENTON ARTS COUNCIL (GDAC) DIRECTOR ATTEST: BYs SECRETARY i at i Page 2 T_ 1 i [E f i { AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTOS, TEXAS AND THE GREATER DENTON ARTS COUNCIL 1 4 THIS AGREEMENT is made on this the day of October, 1990, between the City of Denton, Texas, a municipal corporation (the "CITY"), and the Greater Denton Arts council, a non-profit corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Texas (the IrIDAC°) . I ~ i B II~~ T a L d WHEREAS, the GDAC is a non-profit corporation dedicated to the promotion and provision of artistic performances of all kinds for the benefit of the citizens of Denton; and, WHEREAS, the GDAC has executed a contract for the purchase of real property, together with the improvements thereto, located at 200, West Hickory, Denton, Texas, (the "Theater's), for the purposes of restoring and refurbishing the Theater, through the use of private funds, and utilizing it to provide the citizens of Denton with artistic performances and presentations of many kinds including, but not limited to, music, theater, and dance; and, E WHEREAS, the GDAC has agreed to allow the CITY to use the Theater for the purpose of holding public events, including public meetings, events held in connection with the Denton Main Street Project, and events sponsored by the CITYIS Parks and Recreation Department; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the CITY finds that the GDACIS performance of the terms of this Agreement will benefit CITY'S citizens in a manner consistent with the type of b,anefits histori- cally provided to citizens of municipal governments; and, WHEREAS,'the GDAC having agreed to refrain from requesting, during the term of this Agreement, any extension or renewal of its existing contract with the CITY for the payment of certain hotel tax revenues collected by the CITY, or any other hotel tax revenues for the purpose of restoring and refurbishing the Old Steam Plant; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the performance of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the CITY and the GDAC agree and contract as follows. I. COVEYMN OF GDAC A. Use of premises. GDAC agrees to use the premises for the purposes of conducting meetings and other events (including fund raisers) of its member organizations, and conducting artistic per- formances including any rehearsals thereof, for the benefit of the citizens of Denton, GDAC may also rent the Theater in accordance with the terms contained herein, PAGE 1 't i k GDAC will not permit Theater to be used for any event or in any manner which will violate City ordinances, for any unlawful or commercial purpose, except in accordance with the terms of this Agreement,. GDAC shall adopt rules and regulations governing energy conservation in the Theater and rental of the Theater, which shall be approved by the CITY. In the event GDAC should rent the facility to a non-member, non- public organization or individual, GDAC shall notify CITY of such rental in writing. In such event, CITY shall receive a credit against its monthly payment obligations under Article III, A. Each such credit referred to in Article III. A. as "utility rental charge" shall be equal to one-thirtieth (1/30) of the amount of the cITY'S obligation for the succeeding month. e. city Use. GDAC agrees to permit the CITY, its agents, officers and employees to utilize the Theater, without charge, for the purpose of holding city-sponsored events, including city- sponsored public meetings of any and all kind, events held in connection with the Denton Main street Project, and events sponsored by the City's Parks and Recreation Department. I CITY agrees to comply with the scheduling requirements applicable to GDACf8 member organizations and recognizes that it will not have the right to preempt an event previously scheduled. C. Additional Consideration. l ~ 1. GDAC agrees it will not request an extension or renewal of its existing contract, authorized by Ordinance 90-034 of the City Council, or request additional payment of hotel tax revenues to GDAC for the purpose of renovating the Old Steam Plant. 2. GDAC represents and warrants to CITY that it ;Zas not expended any monies received from CITY02 hotel tax revenues for the acquisition of the Theater, and agrees that no such revenues will be expended on the Theater during the term of this Agreement. 3. GDAC agrees to recognize and acknowledge the financial contributions of the CITY to GDAC in publicity literature prepared and distributed by GDAC, including, but not limited to, theater programs, press releases and pamphlets. 4. GDAC agrees to pay when due all utility bills, taxes, licenses, permit fees, or any other fees rendered or levied against the Theater. 3. GDAC agrees to work with CITY to design and implement programs which will further the public purposes of this Agree- ment. PAGE 2 `i y.. j y k. k~ zx . TERK ment shall be for twenty-five (25) years, The term Of this Agree 1990, and terminating at midnight on commencing October 15, to continue ethe September 30, 2015, provided however that if appropriate funds for subsequent fiscal Y terminate this not funding provided for in Article IZZ hereof, CITY may Agreement at the and of the then current der fiscal this year and Agreement. shall Each ctOber 1 and be obligated to make further payments un annual period of this barAgreement 30 of shall coo succeedimencmng year continue throng III. COVENAMMB Or CITY October 1, 1991, and continuing A. utilities. Beginning September 30, through the billing cycle for the period Including GDAC, ergormed by 1993, CITY, in consideration of the servicss calculated upon utility agrees to reimburse caDAC monthly a city of Denton Utilities and services provided tany h based Up n by a fixed annual allotment as Lone Star Gas Comp olid waste volume and natural orated as electricity, water, attached hereto and incorp reflected on Schedule "A", reference herein. Should ODIC rent the facility, the CITY1e monthly payment nt ) the rental date shall be defined r di ed ineax.aA'unt equ the utility ent following rental charge Not later than May 31r 1993, GDAC shall meet with CITY S to a schedule of utility commencing with the first ~,~epresentatIves and mutually agrees consumption to replace Schedule "A", c cle after September 30, 1993, for the remainder of the based billing y term of this Agreement. t h ocn~ump ion during the previcalculatedous two upon the Theater's hutility years. if parties the decision of thraClTY shall be linalW schedule of consumption, e, other Paps 1891, CITY shall ants. Commencing October 1, j I reimburse GDAC for expenditures made to pay for repairs to the if CITY has t repairs. such expenditures shall be reimoburse only i Theater approved reimbursement nn l period to the perf of i GDAC more ttho as an met forth in Article 000. It is agreed During any annual period of this ZI , the CITY shall not pay anitorial that the CX OITY will not approve reimbursement for j under this expanses or =xpmen~hee Theater incurred to promises. remove asbestos payments ODACh made for expenses section substances are for the solo purpose of reimb rs in es. incurred in repairing or mending Theater The total sum Of all amounts paid by CITY pursuant to Section IZZ, A. through the billing cycles for the period including March 31, 1992 shall be applied as a credit a9aiof example Tif the lCITY tions set forth in Article 111, Be BY way PAGE 3 i z3 f were to pay $13,000 to GDAC for utility services through the billing period including March 31, 1992, the CITY'S obligations pursuant to Article III B. would not commence until October, 1993 and the CITY would be obligated to pay not more than $2,000 during the following year, i C. Energy Efficient Improvements. CITY recognizes that GDAC may zhoose to invest a minimum of $75,000, the first $25,000 of which may be used for general repairs and improvements, for the purpose of constructing major structural or equipment improvements to the Theater which, in the opinion of the CITY: (1) are energy efficient; or (2) will extend the life of the building for a number of years. Should aDAC expend $75,000 for improvements to the Theater, the CITY'S obligation under Article III B. shall be increased to provide for approval of payment for expenses to repair the building in an annual amount not more than $7,500 if: 1. aDAC has submitted the plans for each proposed improve- ment included in the $75,000 sum to CITY; 2. CITY has determined that construction of each such 14- provement would meet the requirements of this section; I and 3. GDAC provides the CITY with proof of payment for con- struction of each such improvement on or before September 30, 1993. If any of the improvements constructed include goods donated or services performed by individuals or organizations which are engaged, in the normal course of business, in selling such goods or performing such services, GDAC may submit proof of the donation of such goods or services and an opinion as to their market value to CITY. CITY shall then determine the market value of such goods or services and shall apply said amount as a coedit against the $75,000 requirement. i I9. TNRNINATIOX A. Default. Should GDAC breach or fail to comply with any provision of this Agreement, such breach shall constitute an Event of Default on the part of GDAC. If an Event of Default occurs, the CXTY shall give GDAC thirty (30) days to remedy the breach. If the breach continues after thirty (30) days, the CITY may terminate the Agreement immediately upon written notice and shall not be obligated to make any additional payment to GDAC. However, if the breach cannot be cured within 30 days after notice, but GDAC has undertaken, in good faith, to carry out a plan to cure the breach, and provides CITY with proof of such efforts made in carrying out the plan, GDAC shall have additional time to complete said plan to PAGE 4 i c3 cure the breach in accordance with the plan, as approved by the CITY. e. unavailability of Funds. The payment this Agreement is contingent upon theavailability CofY funder unds appropriated to pay the sums pursuant to this Agreement. In the event funds become unavailable due to non-appropriation, CITY may notify GDAC in writing and terminate the Agreement. C. other Events. This Agreement shall automatically terminate upon the occurrence of any of the following events: (1) If the j Theater is damaged or destroyed by fire or other casualty to such E an extent that in the CITY's opinion the continued operation and J use of the Theater is not feasible; (2) The termination of the corporate existence of GDAC; (3) The insolvency of GDAC, the filing of a petition in bankruptcy, either voluntary or involuntary, or an assignment by GDAC for the benefit of creditorai or (4) The sale of the Theater. 0. Termination by GDAC. GDAC may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to CITY. J V. REPORTS # GDAC shall furnish to the CITY a report of the services performed by the GDAC under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after the end of each fiscal quarter of this Agreement. Such reports shall summarize the activities of the GDAC in performance of the services specified in Article r and enumerate expenditures and receipts for the preceding quarter. GDAC shall also notify CITY in the event any lien is filed against the Theater premises in the Denton County Real Property.Records. GDAC shall provide CITY and its Executive Director of Finance or his designee with full access at all reasonable times to the Theater and to the books and records of the QVAC which may relate to the Theater. VI. INDEM XPXCATION A. Indemnification. GDAC agrees to indemnity, hold harmless, and defend the CITY, its officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all claims or suits for injuries, damages, loss, or liability of whatever kind or character, arising out of or in connection with the performance by the GDAC of those services { contemplated by this Agreement, including all such claims or causes J of action based upon common, constitutional or statutory law, or based, in whole or in part, upon allegations of negligent or intentional acts of GDAC, its officers, employees, agents, j contractors, licensees and invitees. e. Insurance. GDAC shall obtain and maintain general public liability insurance in the amount of not less than $1,000,000. PAGE 5 t 1 1 I f Such policy or policies shall be issued by companies licensed to transact business in the State of Texas and shall name the CITY as an additional insured. GDAC shall submit proof of such insurance satisfactory to CITY. Any policy or policies must include 30 days notice by carrier to the CITY of its intent to cancel, materially I change, or refuse to renew coverage provided. CITY reserves the right to adjust or increase the liability insurance amounts required of GDAC, and GDAC agrees to meet any such insurance 1 requirements as CITY may requires requirements shall be commensurate withoinsurancewrequireme tsaat other public use theaters similar to the Theater, in size and in scope of activities, located in Texas, GDAC agrees to comply with all adjusted insurance requirements that the CITY may require within sixty (60) days following the receipt of a notice in writing from CITY stating the adjusted requirements. .C. Benefit. This Agreement is entered into for the benefit of CITY and GDAC only and is not intended to benefit third parties. VII. STATUE OF PARTIZB It is understood and acknowledged by the parties that the relationship of GDAC to CITY is that of an independent contractor. GDAC shall have no authority to employ am' agent for or on behalf of CITY for an person or employee or I Y purpose. VIII. KINCMUMOGB A. Assignment. GDAC shall not assign this Agreement, provided however, that GDAC may, subject to CITY#$ written approval, execute an agreement with one or more of its member agencies or representa- tives thereof to manage the Theater. Do Ratio, Any notice required to be given under this Agreement or any statute, ordinance, or regulation, shall be effective when given in writing and deposited in the United states mail, certified mail, return receipt requested, or by hand- delivery, addressed to the respect4.ve parties as followas Ys Greater Dan*~n Arts Cou, nQi~t city Manager Executive Director City Of Denton Greater Denton Arts Council 215 E. McKinney 207 South { Denton, Texas 76201 Denton, Texas l76201 C. Application of Laws. All terms, conditions, and provisions of this Agreement are subject to all applicable federal laws, state laws, the Charter of the City of Denton, all ordinances assed pursuant thereto, and all judicial determinations relative thereto. D. Zzolusive Agreesseat. This Agreement contains the entire understanding and constitutes the entire agreement between the PAGE 6 I{ 4 1 l parties hereto concerning the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations, agreements, or understandings, oral or written, express or implied, between or among the parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement, which are not fully expressed herein. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail notwithstanding any variance in this Agreement from the terms of any other document relating to this transaction, This Agreement shall not be changed or amended except by instrument in writing aaecuted by CITY and GDAC. E. Readings. The headings and subheadings of the various sections and paragraphs of this Agreement are inserted marely for the purpose of convenience and do not express or imply any limitation, definition, or extension of the specific terms of the section and paragraph so designated. T. Notice of Meetings. GDAC shall give CITY'S City Manager advance written notice of the time and place of general meetings of the GDAC Board of Directors. Such notice shall be given in the same manner and at the same time as notice is given of such meetings to members of the board. CITYf8 City Manager, or his designee or any City Councilmember may attend any board meeting at which any mattar relating to the Theater is scheduled for discus- sion. G. Nondiscrimination. GDAC agrees to comply fully with all applicable federal, state and local laws, and rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, regarding nondiscrimination. Specifically, GDAC agrees that no person shall be denied or refused service or other full or equal use of the licensed facilities, nor denied employment opportunities by GDAC as a result of raw, creed, color, religion, sox, national origin, age, or handicap unrelated to ability. R. Nonxaiver. The waiver by CITY of any breach of any provision contained in this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such provision for any subsequent breach of the same or any other provision. j 1. Compliance with Lars. GDAC shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations. Executed this the 4;&& day of , 1990. CITY OF DENTON 1 BERRY, MAY R SOB CASTLE I PAGE 7 t ATPESTs JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY., I APPR ED AS TO LEGAL FORM: a, DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: 'I GREATER 0MON ARTS COUNCIL BY1 JO ANN WHEELERr PRESIDENT ATTEST: I t BYs 7t~t SCHROXDER, SECRETARY i { I s i 1 PAGE 9 f +T{?W SCNEDULZ "All v 2. II. III. Utility Service Annual Consumption Monthly Usage } I y Electricity 18o,00o KWH consumption 15,000 KWH 100 KWH 1 water & sewer 2000000 gallons 81333 gallons Natural Gas 750 cubic feet 62.5 cubic feet p i on or before the 5th day of each month, CITY shall pay GDAC a sum ® akl to the utility billing for the consumption of the utility services 9numerated in Column III. The CITY shall pay all regular monthly charges from the City of Denton for removal of solid waste. I i ~ i i l 4 f i i i. Y M 4 g;\updocs\tmpabdr RESOLUTION N0. _ A RESOLUTION APPOINTING AGENCY AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL WHEREAS, term of office of Ray Stephens for Place 1 on the G 1 , Board of Directors of the Texas Municipal Power Agency has expired/ NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY RESOLVES: rovisions of ordinance E. cam? I. Pursuant to the ti.rms and p hens is hereby ap- No 75-22 of the City of Denton, Texas, Ray step pnirted to the two year term of office to PlacetI onetheofoard of Directors of the Texas Municipal Power Agency, t beginning July 310 1991 and ending July 30, 1993. This Resolution shall become erfective from and yF.(!TTON II after its date of passage, and it is so ordered. _ E i PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1991. a i BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR t i ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY 1 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY } J ; ~I~_T1LY BY, I i7 I `tl f MAR 2 1991 ; serWhIgt a cities of Bryan. Denton, Garland & Greenville. r i March 25, 1991 Mr. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager City of Denton 215 E. McKinney Denton, TX 76201 RE: Board Member Appointment h Dear Mr. Harrell: Our records indicate that Mr. Ray Stephens' term as a Member of the Board of Directors of the Texas Municipal Power Agency will expire duriM the month of = { f July 1991. :4J After the City Council reaches a decision on this matter, please send me a l certified resolution specifying the person selected to represent your City on 33 the TMPA Board of Directors. Your cooperation is appreciated, Sincerely yours, Wanda M, Callahan Assistant Secretary TMPA Board of Directors. wmc I I Texas Municipal Power Agency P.O. Box 7000 Bryan, Texas 77805 (449) 873•$013 1. 1 f1LY4Tt5tf 1a r t' jII CITY COUNCIL 'REPORT FORMLT- Mayor and Members of the City Council i T0: , FROM.. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: DENCO AREA 9-1-1 BUDGET F , RECOMMENDATION: District the Denco Area Staff recommends approving 9-1-1 Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 19921 SUMMARY: State law requires a to the As noted in the cover letter budget, the cities in the District, as well as, the County majority of oRed budget. to approve the prop District has been Denco Area y-1"1 et citizens since August of 1990, the 9 the delivery of enhanear s"propo edibudg to c citzens coordinating the overall throughout Denton County. This Yet. Additionally, amo the same rates as the 1990 ^91 budget. is less than the x.990-91 budget bud et amount of $875,13 unt of $887,138. GROUPS APFECEV PROGRAMS DEPARTMENI'S OR the DENCO 9-1-1 The Police and Fire Departments are affected by District. FISCAL IMPACT: None RESPEC U L loy V. LLY SUBMITTED: s Harr- e~J. City Manager , 1 1'I Prepared by,. on e J L. n la Ar c Treasurer 5973F r, 4 f.c E f~'r1 4 Y DENCO A,RF..A 9-1-1 DISTRICT 1660 S. Stemmons Freeway 1 Suite 295 E T.ewisr Texas 7$067 (214) I4) 221.0911 , ` (214) 420-0709 Fax „ 1 E MEMORANDUM I TO: Denton County Mayors FROM: Mike Pedigo, Executive Directory DATE: August 1, 1991 SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 1992 Budget Approval. Enclosed is a copy of the Denoo Area 9-1.1 District Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 1992 beginning October 1, 1991. The budget was approved by the district's Board of Managers at its July 31, 1991 meeting after a public hearing, The legislation creating the district requires approval of the annual budget from the commissioner's court of each county and the majority of other participating jurisdictions (cities)! The Denco Area 9.1.1 District requests that you place on your regular meeting agenda either fo August or September the consideration of approving the enclosed Budget. It is Important that action be taken prior to the next fiscal year, Should you have any questions, please call us at (214) 221,0911, Thank for your assistance. i { i i ryr. v t !Ri I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1991-92 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET OF THE DENTON COUNTY EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION DISTRICT, PURSUANT fO ARTICLE 1432a V.A.T.S.) AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Denton has been pre- sented the 1991-92 Fiscal Year Budget of Denton County Emergency Communication District, hereinafter referred to as DENCO AREA 9-1- 1, for approval, in accordance with article 1412x, section 7(D), V.A.T.S., as amendedt NOW, THEREFOREf THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION I. The City of Denton approves the budget. SECTIQN II. That this resolution shall take effect immediate- ly from and after its passage. Ih PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1091, BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST 7 JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BYt { APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BYt s DENCO AREA 9.1.1 DISTRICT , 9 Y FISCAL YEAR, 1992 OPERATING BUDGET i ! ,I ;l l v t TABLE OF CONTENTS , Budget Overview i Summary of Cost Classification Budget Summaries Schedule 1 - Summary of Anticipated Revenues by Source 4 and Proposed Expenditures Schedule 2 - Summary of Anticipated Revenues by Source I _ Schedule 3 - Proposed Expenditures by Item f Budget Spreadsheet t , Salary Spreadsheet i E ~ I ti j t i t i ~ r l t 1 } i t Ia F 1 { 1 DEhICO ARF 9.1.1 STRICT I i Fiscal Year 1992 Budget Overview y In August, 1987, Denton County voters approved the creation of the Denco Area 9•1-1 District for the purpose of implementing and coordinating Enhanced 9-1.1 Service for the citizens of Denton County! On August 18, 1990, Enhanced 9-1•1 service became a reality throughout Denton County, ` The District is governed by a Board of Managers appointed by the Denton County Commissioners Court, the councils of the cities within the county and the Denton County Fire Chief Association. The Board members serve two year terms and are eligible for reappointment on a stating basis! The current Board of Managers Is comprised of the following members, Chief Randy Corbin, Denton County Fire Chitifs Association Olive Stephens, Denton County City Councils John MaGrane, Denton County City Councils Jim Ferguson, Denton County Commissioners Court Crnmissioners Court J, Kert Goode, Denton County al Telephone Company Melvin Willis (non-voting), Article 1432c, Vernon Revised Texas Statutes, provides Legislation creating the District, for the Distrit to collect a 9.1.1 se nve ere aede~ sthr careers ant f(3 o) of the monthly base rate for the primary service p ws: l Residential Line .27 Business Line .71 Business Trunk 1.13 { All non-recurring costs, recurring costs, and administrative costs are met through available revenues generated by the 9.1.1 service fee, ~I I On July 31, 1991, the Denco Area 9.1.1 District Board of Managers approved the Fiscal i Year, 1992 Operating Budget, Highlights of the budget are as follows, I ii f i p 1 i i ~Ik Budget Overview ' Page 2 ;I ANTI IP C>D 1?E- light increase three percent and 1992, Plan refl two percent ,,tivel beginning in January, The revenue side of tand'Southwestern Bell to P yanies f anticipate a stable b)r GTE i al , C 1 The Lake Dallas, Centel and Muenster Telephone Lamp i revenue stream. g92 Is projected to be considerably less than 1991 because of a decrease Interest in 1 P in the fund balance and declining interest rates, ed for t to the fund balance reflects $87,000 pruject nonrecurring The adjustmen ui ment replacement reserve, The non- expenditures as well as a a public p Answering Po1nt at Lake Daua equipment i recurring expenditures include a Public Safety resent PSAPs, The equi m t a computer system to collect statistical data at p re nd for rep replacement reserve Is a new account to be used as a fu 1 adjustment to the fund balance leaves the p 'equipment It the future. The ad ers, enhancing equip desired by the Board of Manag $200,000 fund contingency C nn nvc t5FD EI percent In ~l -B The expense side of the 1992 budercentdinanperating ecosts, of and 63 a 46 percent personnel son reflect casts, a decrease of 48 percent nel and operation expenditures personnel er u the t, dt;a bincrease in direct services, The total , Direct Services represent 71 per a decrease of three percent of Personnel WAS have Increased significantly over the 1991 budget for severe! reasons, Those reasons are as follows: I Salaries _ i include a full•time executive ~•,.~ector that was not included In the l i s The 1991 Budget Planned for four months of salary far the Salaries previous budget ! executive director. staff and I pt increase The proposed salaries include a three at Y Base Managerr, PublicaEducation a a five percent step Increase for the Data The step increases are to ; and Training Manager, and Executive Secretarybe used at the discretion of the executive director. d i i 4 9 t f Budget Overview Page 3 a s The salary of the executive director, to be set by the Board, is budgeted at the same percentage increase of three percent and five percent. Budgeted Salaries Executive Director $48,668 ~ Data Base Manager 31,662 Public Education Manager 27,302 Executive Secretary 23,025 Benefits The primary change in benefits are in health coverage. The projected expenditures for health coverage reflect a 20 percent Increase over current rates because of the unpredictability of insurance costs, Temporary Services f Temporary services includes costs for temporary help when employees are absent for extended periods or for special circumstances, The 1992 budget reflects a part-time data base technician to assist with development of the rural data base after the addressing project is completed, !I Operations costs include all of the line items necessary to provide support to the district on an ongoing basis. The budget category reflects a considerable decrease in costs ( primarily due to the decrease in other professional services. The differences in the operational costs between the FY 1991 budget and the proposed FY 1992 is $807, excluding the services of Tarrant County. Office Space Denco Is currently negotiating a long term lease for space at a lower unit rate per per square foot, The District will require additional space to facilitate Board meetings and Emergency Service Provider meetings. Additional space will also be used to store public education materials. memo 9 I ti t, Budget Overview Page 4 Travel The travel line items provide for staff and Board members to attend national and state conferences to keep abreast of technological, administrative and legal changes in the emergency communications field, The National Emergency Number Association, Associated Public Safety Communications Officers Association and Advisory Commission on State Emergency Communications (State 9-1.1 Commission) are examples of organizations that address Issues directly related to the operation of the Denco Area 9.1- 1 District. Direct Services reflect pass through costs tor services that go directly to the district. These expenditures Indicate an increasing cost in recurring expenses because of the growth of the district, Monthly costs are directly proportional to the number of customers served, The 1992 non-recurring expenditures include the installation of a primary Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) at Luke Dallas and a computer system at each PSAP to be f utilized In gathering statistical data for the PSAPs as well as the district. The system will detail the number of calls answered by position, the number of hang up calls, the time elapsed before answering a call, the number of calls transferred and more. The IIV information will be beneficial in tracking 9.1.1 traffic as well as locating potential problems, The public education budget Includes, In addition to handout materials, signs to be Installed at the entrances of cities in the district notifying the public of their access to 9-1.1 in Denton County. The budget also includes billboard space rental advertising 9.1.1 In Denton County, This will be benefcial In bringing families and businesses to the county. The 1992 budget Includes more recognition of call-takers to Include National Telecommunicators Week and 9.1.1 Day activities, Telecommunicator training is probably the most important service the district can provide, Proper use of the equipment Is only the minimum training the district should provide attendants. In FY 1992, Denco proposes to include training in stress management, a primary factor in the turnover of personnel. The district proposes to provide specialized training to call-takers utilizing services of experts in the field, Overall, the fiscal year 1992 budget provides for the well-trained and educated professional staff necessary to provide support services to the Denco Area 9.1.1 District network, The financial plan includes operating considerations required to provide the support and the direct services needed to make the system function at its best. i tL'3 DENCO AREA 9.1.1 DISTRICT k Summary of Cost Classifications Fiscal Year, 1992 Budget PERSONNEL. of temporary employees, and Includes the actual total salary and benefit zptaielsservices, if fees paid to agencies for temporary persoMe5l, services. OPERATIONS Includes operational costs to provide continued 9.1.1 emergency network support services to the District, C'~mmunLatians i Includes the telecommunication, printing/publishing and postage/shipping costs necessary for tite District to disseminate information. Telecommunications costs Include telephone, facsimile, pagers and other telecommunication line charges, lease payments, local and long distance service and system maintenance. ; Printing/publishing includes all costs of outside printing, binding, collating, design, layout, photography, art work, and similar costs related to the preparation and puhiicatlon of printed matter, video presentations, and similar costs not directly associated with public education or telecommunlcator j training, This also includes purchase and reproduction costs of maps, postage/shipping Includes all postage, postal insurance, freight, delivery, postal meter rental and other related costs except when postage/shipping costs are included in the total purchase price of a specific Item. Off ce~uonlies Includes the cost of routine expendable office supplies such as letterhead, ens, pencils, ribbons and all computer and copier paper. This ; envelopes, p also includes minor equipment u with an yquairition cast of less than $300.00 or a life expectancy of ess f 4 ,.s4:,,,.k# v i r ss'o Se e Includes the costs of legal fees, accounting services, Independent audit and other outside consultant costs, Also includes professional development costs authorized for conference membership now employees tuition reimbursement, reimbursement paidtol , as part of recrultment agreement, and staff training, I QffiaSpa quiPrz ee►?t Includes all office and maintenance payments and any costs for temporary officcs, storage space or similar facilities, Also Includes the lease or purchase and maintenance of office equipment and furnishings with an acquisition cost x greater than $300,00, Od a life expectancy of more than one (1) y a * ►pmber^hinsiSUbscrintions Includes organizational memberships in professional organizations such as ANA, NLNA and APCO, Individual organizational memberships are considered "professional development" if they are not transferable between, staff members, Includes subscriptions to newspapers, periodicals, information services, and the purchase or rental of books, videos and recordings, Ii dv si Includes the costs of public public meeting notices, olicitat an fornbidsnjob annnunccmentsganld similar other costs related to the media, ti Irzsu~, r~nce fidelity, notary bonds or insurance for Denco Includes all liability, casualty, property, offices or employees, ~ Ira j Includes costs such as, but not limited to, mileage reimbursements, airfare, food, lodging, local transportation, parking, telephone, eta;, when such costs are, reasonable and when they are incurred in conjunction with Board and authorized staff travel. Also includes financial assistance for automobile maintenance and full costs necessary to meet authorized staff's transportation needs for conducting Denco business within the metroplex area, 1 t DIREc;r SERVICES Includes all costs attributed directly to Denco's 9-1.1 Network. pSA.P Eauiornent and Se ce Includes non-recurring and monthly recurring costs for 9.1-1 equipment and service, as well as a reserve for equipment replacement and/or enhancement. Eubiio Education i Includes costs for signage, coloring books, decals, phone stickers and other j public education materials distributed throughout the District. Also includes costs for special functiors ouch as telecommunicator week recognition, V 9-1-1 Day activities, etc, Te ecommynicator~ Trainin¢ i Includes costs for materials, equipment and space rental, guest speakers, etc, associated with meeting the training needs of 9.1.1 call-takers. i I i 1 i 1 i a , t r 4 SCHEDULE 1 Denco Area 9.1.1 District Summary of Anticipated Revenues by Source and Proposed Expenditures Fiscal year, 1992 Amount Anticipated Source of Funds $ 718,973 9.1.1 Service Pees 25,925 Interest income j Adjustment in Fund Balance } $ U LM Total Anticipated Revenues Prop enditures ,97$ II used $ 173 personnel 78, Operations Direct S,.*Mces . $ Total Proposes! Expenditures 1 x '1 1 t t SCHEDULE 2 Denco Area 9.1-1 District j Summary of Anticipated Revenuers by Source Fiscal Year, 1992 Source Amount 9.1-1 Service Fees GTE Southwest $ 583,254 Southwestern Bell 100,485 Lake Dallas Telephone Company 18,594 Centel 169616 Muenster Telephone Company Total 9.1-1 Service Fee 718,973 Interest income R invested Funds $ 18,425 I Operating Funds i I Total Interest Income ~ 25,925 Total Anticipated Revenue $74 Adjustment in Fund Balance 130.190 l Planned Expenditures sALOLM I 3 { l 1 SCHEUULE3 Denco Area 9.1.1 District i I Proposed Expenditures by Item j Fiscal Year, 1992 PERSONNEL 1 Salaries $1300657 Benefits 37,31$ Temporary Service 6,0( 173,975 OPERATIONS E Communications l Telecommunications 61255 i Printing/Publishing 11500 Postage/Shipping ]~12 81880 I ~ Office Supplies 2>600 Professional Services Lagal Services Accounting 2,000 Independent Audit 3,500 Professional Development 3,000 Other Professional Services Im 18,500 Office Space/Lquipment Office Space 169440 Equipment/Furnishings 7,244 23,640 Membership/Subscriptions Memberships 785 Subscriptions 1,570 , Advertising 300 Insurance 500 i Travel/Auto Travel 12,650 Auto Allowance 10.200 78,840 j *A ,1 Schedule 3 Proposed Expenditures Page 2 DIRECT SERVICES i PSAP Equipment and Service Monthly Recurring Expenditure 426,573 Non-Recurring Expenditure 87,000 588,573 Equipment Replacement Reserve 75,000 Public Education 29,700 Telecommunicator Training -a Total Expenditures 01 { l i f y . Denton Police Department 221 N. ELM OENTON, TEXAS 78201 1 TOs Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager FROM$ Michael W. Jez, chief of Police DATEi August 15, 1991 SURJ)CTs Resolution Supporting Municipal Regulation of Possession of open Containers Rick, The City of Dallas has spearheaded an effort to get the 72nd Texas sion Legislature to give municipalities the right to regulate the posses of open containers of alcoholic beverages. T am of the Opinion that such legislation would be helpful and in our best intsrest. As you know, we have had a number of probleme, particularly in the Fry Street area, of mass gatherings. on occasions here have been as many as three hundred people '.i the streets con"ming in conflict selit to the slightlynoidents alconore and officers UIte intoxicated persona. The passage o~ the proposed legislation would give home rule cities the right to regulate possession of open containers in the interest of public safety and economic development. Tt would not require local action but would certainly make it possible if deemed necessary. tive means of regulatory control 2 do believe it would provide a more effec + in certain parts of our city than is currently available. v d al W J07 Chief of of e cos Jennifer Walters city secretary i i t 1 M8TR0 434.2820 (817}888.9181 i. c k g~\wpdocs\contninr I i g RESOLUTION NO. i p NICIPAI.ITIES BE ALLOWED TO REGULATE E CONTAINERS WITHIN CERTAIN A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THAT MU EFFECTIVE POSSESSION OF OONF ATHE HMUNICIPALITY I AND DECLARItd AN EFFE DESIGNATED AREAS DATE. WHEREAS, the called session of the 72nd Texas Legislature convened on July 151 19911 and WHEREAS, many cities aorosS the State are plagued by problems of public safety and diminished eeanomicdeva l oopment beverage cone inability to regulate Possession of ope tainersi and iorn of would prefer that open alcoholic beverage Contain- Wt3EREAS, the City of Denton allowed to regulate posy of the munieipalitYl NOW, era within certain deli}grated areas THEREFOREr THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DrNTON HEREBY RESOLVESI Council of the City of Denton Support That the City C all passage of in the Texas possession ofiapeno uld alcoholic s home rule municipalities to regulate p k beverage containers within designated portions of a city. That the City Manager is directed to communicate ~xrTION Imo. l the purpose of this resolution to members of the Texas Legislature and the Governor, of Denton re- crrTrON ITS. That the City Council of the City to the f quests the Govern led session(s)iofuthe 7 nd Leyisl tuxeity agenda of the cal 1 t immediately That this resolution shall take effe~ from and r its passage in accordance with the provisions of the ived. he City of Denton and it is accordingly at, Cego Charter of t y 1991. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of i BOi3 GASTLESERRY, MAYOR l , i ATTEST; JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY i BY! 1 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM! DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BYt , i 1 v f l `f 5 i Page 2 Yebii-a? r t CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT To: Mayor and Members of the City Council c FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager the Commercial Lease Agreement between the SUBJECT: Second Amendment to city of Denton and FOX-5'i, Ltd. RECO~DATIONS It is the recommendation of the Ai p°Commercial YLeased Agreementobetweenf the approve the second Amendment d' the City of Denton and FOX-~511 Ltd., calls for Leased Land Property A to be expanded to 105,180.55 sq. ft. or 2.4146 acres of land (see Attachment' "A"!'. r SUMMARY: Ltd., will peY There will be no coat to the City of Denton. FOX-510 r k approximately $7F362.64 dollars per year for thin property. BACl{G_.--~ _ i N/A S PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPG AFFECTED2 This agreement will not affect any other department or group. 1 FISCAL IMPACT 7 None. Resp full s fitted: o Ha r i Cit Manager Prepared bys T ompeaon J e ! Airport Man f Approve % s 5 Ri Deputy City Manager 7 } { z~ .7,..E 7 aryof DEN TON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING DEN TON, rEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (617) 666.6309 Office of the Clty Secretary M E M O R A N D U M TO: Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager FROM: Rick svehla, Deputy City Manager ! DATE: June 27, 1991 E , SUBJECT: Fox 51 Lease Amendment i Attached is the amendment to the Fox 51 lease at the Airport. I have also included a couple of drawings which show th4 exact location of the new lease in relation to the existing buildings. Also, a site plan of the buildings to included. As we understand it, Fox 51 intends to build shell-type hangars that could be finished out to suit as they lease them out. The ultimate plan would include three - 9800' hangars. As we mentioned, this is an amendment to the existing lease. The price of 70 a foot was established when the original lease and amendments were agreed upon by the Council and Fox 61, The additional 105,180 square feet will generate an additional $7,362,63 for us each year. We are excited about Fox Silo expansion. The Airport board was also pleased to see this development. They approved the concept plan and the amendment to the lease at their nesting in J%:ne pending the final revision of details by the Attorney's office. It you or the Council has any further questions, T would be happy to try and answer them at your convenience. R eQsvefflt I~ Deputy City Manager RStbw 5393M Attachments ( 4 f t. f TO: The Mayor and Members of the City Couricil i FROM: Joe Thompson, Airport Manager DATE: August 131 1991 SUBJECT: Second Amendment to the Denton andmer ial Lease Agreement between the City of E to the Commercial Lease Agreement between The Second Amendment Ltd., calls for Leased land the City of Denton and FOX-51f Property "A" to be expanded to 105,180.55 sq. ft. or 2.4146 acres of land (see attachment "A"). The Buildings estimated cost of construction is $476,4544.00 I dollars with an estimated life of at least thirty (30) years. with the colors being light The overall size is 98 x 100 ft. tan sides with a white roof to match the existing building occupied by FOX-51, Ltd. (see Attachment "B"). i 1 i 9 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT NO, 2 TO THE AIRPORT COMMERCIAL OPERATOR LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND FOX-51 LIMITED: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, certain real property upon the Denton Municipal Air- port was leased to Fox-5't Limited, a Texas partnership, by lease agreement Oated April 10 19861 and WHEREAS, the City and lessee amended the lease in 1998; and WHEREAS, the city of Denton and the lessee desire to further amend the lease agreement) and WHEREAS, the Airport Advisory Board for the City of O9nton has recommended approval of the Second Amendment) NOW, THEREPORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: { i SECTION I. That the attached Second Amendment to the airport commercial lease agreement between the City of Denton and Fox-51 Limited is approved SECTION II. That the Mayor is authorized to execute the at- tached lease amendment on behalf of the City and the City Secretary I is directed to affix this resolution with the executed lease amend- ment to the original airport lease agreement dated April 1, 1986, inscribing on the original agreement the fact it has been amended and the effective date of thu amendment. i SECTION Ili. That this resolution shall become effective im- mediately upon its passage and approval, { PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1991, i { HOS CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTESTi SENNIFER WALTER, CITY SECRETARY BY) APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY I BYI T~. N SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE COMMERCIAL OPERATOR LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND FOX-51 LIMITED L This lease amendment is made this day of 1 1991, between the City of Denton, Texas, (Lessor) a municipal corporation and Fox-51 Limited (Lessee), a Texas corporation, having its principal offices at Route 1, Box 102, Denton, Texas, 76205. Recitals Lessor owns and operates the Denton Municipal Airport (Airport) in the City of Denton, Texas, in 1986, Lessor leased .land at the Airport to Lessee for the purposes of conducting a commercial busi- ness. In 1988, Lessor and Lessee agreed to the amendment to the lease (First Amendment). Lessor and Lessee now wish to make fur- ther amendments to the lease. Agreement in consideration of the promises of each, the parties agree that the following provisions of the airport lease dated April 1, 1986, as amended on January 2, 1988, is further amended as followss 1. Section II, Leased Premises, is hereby amended to read as followss It. LEASED PREMISES A, LAild - Property As Lessor leases to Lessee the following tracts of lands ALL that tract or parcel of land lying in the T. Toby Sur- vey, Abstract Number 1288, City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, as shown in Exhibit A and described as followss COMMENCING at the northwest corner of a tract of land as conveyed to the Nobles Company by deed recorded in Vol- ume 2798, Page 695, Real Property Records of Denton County, Texas, said point lying in the south line of F.M. 15151 { THENCE north 88' 33' 4311 west with the south line of said F.M. 1515 a distance of 265.14 feeti j THENCE north 01' 500 39" west along and near a fence on the east line of Tom Cole Road a distance of 1000.00 feats t .V I.I. 1 f THENCE south 88' 09' 2111 west a distance of 902.71 feet to a corner on the east line an asphalt taxiway; THENCE north 12' 25' 0011 west with the east line of said taxiway a distance of 274.35 feet! THENCE north 770 35' 0011 east a distance of 280.00 feet to an iron pin at the point of beginning of the herein de- scribed tract/ THENCE north 12' 25' 00" west a distance of 240.00 feet, to a point for a corned THENCE north 774 35' 0011 east a distance of 427.15 feet to a point for a corners THENCE south 17' 42' 13" east a distance of 241.03 feet to a point for a corners ' t THENCE south 77. 35' 00" west a distance of 449.36 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 105,180.55 square feet or 2.4146 acres of land. Together with the right of ingress and egress to the property, in common with others so authorized, of passage upon the Airport prop- arty generally, subject to reasonable regulations of Lessor. This right shall extend to Lessee's employees, passengers, patrons, and invitees. i B. La= - Property Bt I All that certain tract or parcel of land lying in the T. Toby Survey, Abetract Number 1285, City of Denton, Denton j County, Texas, as shown in Exhibit A, wad described as followss COMMENCING at the northwest corner of a tract of land as conveyed to the Nobles Company by deed recorded in Volume E 27981 Page 655, Roal Property Records, of Denton County, it Texas said point lying in the south line of F.M. Road 1515; THENCE north 88' 33t 4';" west with the south line of said I F.M. Road 1515 a distance of 755.14 teets li THENCE north 016 50' 39" west along and near a fence on the east line of Tom Cole Road a distance of 1000.00 feed y THENCE south 88' 09' 21" west a distance of 902.71 feet to ; I`4 a corner on the east line an asphalt taxiways THENCE north 12' 25' 00" west with the east line at said taxiway a distance of 274.35 Peet; page 2 T t I ~ 4 } j THENCE north 77' 35' 0011 east a distance of 340.00 feet to an iron pin at the point of beginning of the herein de- scribed tract; THENCE north 77° 354 0011 east a distance of 389.36 feet to j a point for a corners THENCE south 17' 42' 13" east a distance of 115.49 feet to E a point for a corner; f , THENCE south 55' 35' 32" went a distance of 280.40 feet to an iron pin for a corners THENCE south 77' 35' 00" west a distance of 140,00 feat to an iron pin for corner; P THENCE north 12' 25' 00" west a distance of 220.00 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 73,737.45 square feet or 1.6928 acres of land. C. Development of Tract B. 1. Property 8 is leased to Lessee for the purpose of future i development by Lessee. Upon commencement of development of j any property within Property B, the property shall on that date be considered to be an addition to Property A and be subject to the same terms and conditions as Property A, including but not limited to, the same rental rate and adjustments, if any, as if the added property had been with- in Property A from the original date of execution of this Lease. The date of issuance of a building permit by Lessor ! for the improvements shall be considered the '$commencement of development". 2, If Lessee fails to commence development of at least thirty- six thousand eight hundred sixty nine (36,869) square feet of Property B by January 11 1996, that amount of property shall be automatically be considered as an addition to { Property A on that date as if commencement of development had begun on that property. 3, if Lessee fails to commence development of the remainder of the property within Property B by January 1, 1998, that property shall be automatically be considered as an addition to Property A on that date as if commencement of development had begun on that property. 0. Premises Defined. For the purposes of this Agreement, the term "Premises" shall mean all property located within the metes and bounds described above in Properties A and B, including leasehold Page 3 j i L IM1'1 ii. i 1g i 1 R improvements constructed by the Lessee, but not including certain easements or property owned or controlled by the j Lessor. I 2. Section IV, PAYMENTS RENTALS AtiD_F__E~, paragraph A, Land Rq tom, is amended to read as follows: 1 A. Land Rental t 1. The land rental for Property A shall begin at seven cents ($o.o7) per square foot, per year, , payable in twelve (12) equal monthly installments in advance, sn or before the first day of each I month. The rental shall be subject to the adjust- i ments contained in this lease. r J. Paragraphs A and 8 of Section VIII, LEAgEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS are amended to read as follows: i _f A. Imorovemgnt Requirements. In making any improvements on the Premises, Lessee shall comply with the followings 1. All requirements of the Lessor's Land Develop- tent code, other than platting requirements, including but not limited to Lessor's Suild- ing, Fire, Electrical, and Plumbing Codes, and other Codes and ordinances applicable to the improvements to be made, including the payment i of any fees established by ordinance. i 2. Prior to commencing development, Lessee shall obtain the city council's determination that the improvements conform to and are compatible with the overall size, shape, color, quality, design, appearance, and general plan of the program established by the Lessor's Master Plan for the Airport. 3. Any rules or regulations of the any Federal or State agency having jurisdiction thereof. g, Ting tog Aggroyal by Council f The required determination by the City Council that the plans are co patible with the Master Plan for the Airport shall be made by the Council within sixty (60) days of proper submission of the plans to Lessor. If the Council fails to act within the sixty (60) days, the plane shall be deemed approved for the purposes of the f requirement of compatibility with the Master Plan, but shall not be deemed approved for any other requirment, including the requirement Page 4 . _ 17 ~,1r rie.>.snx p j to comply with the Lessons Land Development Code and other applicable codes, E 4. Section IX, ASSIGNMENT OF FARF is amended to read as follows: IX. ASSIGNMENT OR B A4F j Lessee shall not assign this lease or sublet, assign, transfer, nor license all or part of the Leased Promises without the prior written approval of Lessor. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BYs ATTESTi JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY I BYt APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A, DRAYOVITCH, CYTY ATTORNEY l 1 BYa 3 FOX-51 LIMXTED I BY s ATTESTt t BYt ' SECRETARY i; i l Page 5 p e Exhibit A 1 I rs 3 49TAL 10 R 0 J1 ~ ASP~A~"t r 42T.5e w Nrig42,%3'~ 1 _ yy ,S . Taw ~ we ` h 2.4fae ~G' c K OR A 90 FT 449.3e ~ s 50o80,61I , W •a $ 77, 42' 13 j ~~}11N4 369.3e r~ l ty i1 2' 13, jFkAC w6 OP 1 13,731,96 $0• Ft. 4 i3O5 X07 1 I o~ t a p~tivE ~ ~ a pSPNA~^~ raA' t rw rM tl Y 102. 7l~~ ~I((I j I 7 I Z . i City of Denton 4 Municipal Building J;• Denton. Texas 76201 A Group 8•Diviaion 3 Hangar is • Hangar Where No Repair Work is Done, Which Requires The Use of an Open Flame, Welding or the use of Class 1 or 2 Liquids'.. 2. Exterior Wells of Group 8 Division 3 Hangars Which are Lees Then 20' i From a Property Line or Lease Line Shell be of Minimum 1-Hour Fire Resistive Construction.' -The 20' Requirement Does Not Apply To Building Walls Fronting on a Public Street. 3. A Group H Division 5 Hangar is Hangar Where the Use of an open Flame Welding or Close 1 or 2 Liquids May be Required. 4. Exterior Walls of Group H Division 5 Hangars Which are Lose Then 60' I Fto m a Property Line or Lease Line Shall be of Minimum l-Hour Fire Resistive Construction, j S. The 60' Requirement Does Not Apply to Building Wells Fronting on a ` Public Street, 6. Where More Than 1 Building is Located on the Saw Lot or Tract of Land a Property Line Must be Assumed Between Buildings, Therefore, if the 37' j Separation Shown Remains, the West Walls of the Proposed Hangars}lould i Be Required to be of Muniaum 1-flour Fire Reesative Construction if Minimum of 40' Separation Can be Provided bosrea n 8.3 Hangars go t-Hour Walls Would be Required. To Avoid 1-Hour Wall Construction between A 8.3 And A H-5 Hangar the Mieimuet Separation Would be 801. ' Separation batween 2 H-5 Hangars Would be 120' in Order to Avoid 1-Hour doll construction. 7. An Example of a l-Hour Fire Resistive Wall Would be 1 Layer of 5/8" Fire Code Gypsum Board on Each Side of a Motel Stud Wall. B. A Minimum Separation of 42' 8etweer••Hangars Would Permit a Parking Arrageuent as Shown i 9. 1 Paved Perking Space Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. of Floor Area to Required for i Each Hangar. 106 Every Building What* Persons Are Employed Shall be Provided With At Least 1 Water Closet. 11. Separate Paeilities Shall be Provided for Lach Sax When the Number of Employees Exceeds 4,and Both Boxes Are Employed. In Group So'Divisfon - 3 Occupancies When Tottet Facilities Are ProvidedAt Least I Such Facility Shall Meet Design Requirements for the Physically Handicapped. 14. k: r OWMI f F3 1. 1 If M y ~14~ a yi .1r , fIM~R ` •I 1 Y~.r4 s r .r+.St 4 •J ~.~I~ l~~ ,i 1 j fiy ,.1 L.' I f' , Oro~ r 1~7t ? ,J. ~I' LiM 41`NMNIV •11fN i1.l'I~.f~ ' 1 , 4Y1 '~•~~ly, a . r 1tt 7 x a.nr..•V.Vr a 1 r. L 1. t S; rl 7'• r l' ti Ji1~l~I''S44J't1. tS I , h ' Y :+y~t/a!• t• Pp .r. a y • . ~ r w..rit V, ,(.r it ~x•x;M. 4 P.. 12, " Lendin~i'Shall bi Provided At Each Exit When Finished', rrad04ie tio're Y ' i Than M1ow,;he Poor Threshold in Group B# Division 3 Occupaoofas. 11 130*- Landings Shall Be Provided At each Exit When Finished Grade'.is;Mors Than 11, Below the Door Threshold in Group H, Division S.Aroupsocies. 14. Electrical Wiring Shall We Installed in Acoordance With Article S13 of the Rational Electrical Code, is. Floor Surfices Shall Be Nonabsorbent. 16. 'Septic Tank Permits Are Issued by Utility Department. Contact t Glenn to Adequate Water Information light a Gary $66-7121. w i.e.Whether H or Not Gary There Should Fire Flo Fire At This Site. :,!}A 1' 40 ,yj/yam/•'/j~/j/^~ "{/~J • • y, .11' • fi • ' ~'Jaokie•>'Doyle ;~ii''r~~ i+~°1u Frank Strickler ;r Building officieli .rl . , ell.'41 ,'Y 1 '+r, 'r Ix f - . n a 4k~L'1Y1~,'y I r al.1J:. j'~'t~ •'1ti't1Y'GI i . S 1^t w ' 1 . r, 'f 4..w4iNM.^ 1 4 ~~W}rL Ph. r 411', l r .r..n .w``•5 l a • • u., ...r r.. I w P,,r a }a0at; i i l t I , I MINUTES AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD JUNE 12, 1991 CHAIRMAN - RICK WOOLFOLK THE CITY OF DENTON AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD MET FOR ITS REGULAR MEETING ON JUNE 12, 19910, AT 5630 P.M. IN THE CITY OF DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CONFERENCE ROOM, DENTON, TEXAS. MEMBERS PRESENT: Jay Anderson, Rick Woolfolk, A131e Miller, ` George Gilkeson, Nancy Hundley and Gene Wright. MEMBERS ABSENT : John Dulemba. OTHERS PRESENT : Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager; Joe Thompson, Airport Manager; and Celina Gonzalez, Airport Staff. I. The Board considered the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 15, 1991. Minutes approved as written. Ii. Public Session There were no items for discussion in the Public Session._ III. FOX-51, Ltd., Building Review The Board reviewed a letter from Joe Thompson, Airport Manager, to Frank Strickler, FOX-51* confirming authorization to proceed with the construction of a security fence around the old north hangar pad site at Denton Airport. Per discussion in the previous Board Meeting concerning FOX-51's construction of three new hangars on Denton Airport,' Joe Thompson stated that.a Legal Request has been submitted to the City of Denton Legal Department requesting e resolution authorizing in amendment to FOX•51to Commercial Lease Agreement with the City for additional square footage per the survey of FOX-51's proposed building site. 1 DRAFT Airport Advisory Board June 12, 1991 Page 2 The Legal document and the site survey were reviewed by the Board. In addition, the Board discussed the FOX-51 j hangar building requirements as outlined by Jackie Doyle, City of Denton Building Official. These hangar requirements were reviewed and approved by Frank Strickler, FOX-51 (see attachment "A"). ) Rick Woolfolk, Hoard Chairman, pointed out that there has been some communication breakdown between Frank Strickler and the DRC, which has lead to delays in expediting FOX-51 to building projects. Mr. Woolfolk explained that Mr. Strickler has failed to attend DRC meetings to discuss the building projects. Mr. Woolfolk has suggested to Mr. ' Strickler that in order to prevent further delay, he should attend DRC meetings to answer any questions the City might I have regarding FOX-51's proposed hangars. Additional i information reviewed by the Board included an application submitted by Joe Thompson to the City Economic Development Department requesting that the sewer lines at Denton Airport I be extended to the north and of the Airport: in order that existing buildings and new buildings be hooked into the I' sever mains. Fir. Thompson asked Beard Members to review FOX-51's Building Review and direct any questions or suggestions to the Hoard Chairman or the Airport Manager. George Gilkeson made a motion to accept the amendment to FOX-51's Commercial Lease for additional square footage and to approve the location of the building according to the current site plan. Jay Anderson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Board will make a recommendation to the City Council to approve the building plans at the Airport Board/City Council meeting, tentatively scheduled for June 25, 1991. IV. Airport Master Plan Review Joe Thompson explained that he has received two acknowledgments regarding the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) letter recently mailed out to seven Master Planning Groups for an Airport Master plan update for Denton f Municipal Airport. Mr. Thompson stated that the deadline for submittals is June 30, 1991. Following this deadline, I ! i . S q. A3i :.fhg I DRAFT Airport Advisory Board { June 12, 1991 Page 3 i i the Airport Selection Committee would meat to review the RFQ's and select.a Planning Group for the project. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, suggested- that in the event 1 that three or less Planning Groups submit RFQ's, that it would be in the best interest of the Board to dissolve I the selection Committee and invite the prospective Planning Groups to present their qualifications before the Airport Board. After brief discussion, the Board found Mr. Svehla's recommendation acceptable. Mr. Thompson added that on July 3, 1991, the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) will meet to review the Airport Pre-Applications that have been submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration. Mr. Thompson invited Board Members to attend. V. Airport Manager's Report I I s. Pre-application for Federal' Assistance the Board reviewed a summary of the Pre-applications -.for Federal i Assistance per the 1986 Master Plan to be reviewed by NCTCOG on July 3, 1991. Following review, the NCTCOG will make recommendations to the F.A.A. j b. ASOS Update - Mr. Thompson stated that on June 4, ' 1991, the Lease Agreement was signed by the City Council !I for approval of the installation of the ASOS. Construction is tentatively scheduled for August, 1991, co June, 1991 Monthly Invoice - reviewed by the Board as general information. d. April, 1991 Monthly Expenditures - reviewed by the . Board as general information. e. Drainage Improvements - Mr. Thompson stated that the Infield Drainage project is currently in its final stages and is scheduled to be completed during the weak of June 170 1991. I ' I rrr.:a#u IiLNi zt/,q{flg7~y~ r DRAFT 1 Airport Advisory Board June 12, 1991 Page 4 The Board adjourned into Executive Session at 6:20 p.m• and reconvened in open Session at 6:45 p.m. Rick woolfolk informed the Board that the Airport Board/City informing the Board Son for June Council Deputy CitY i Ma The Deguty na$ear swill bescheduled this issue. been no 1 The Board Chairman added that there has re-appointments to the Airport Board and that the present Members continue to serve on the Board. Rick Svehla stated' Boardy Council# theye Bare oard remembers placed are to ot serve according the the re-appointed. With no further business, the Board Mesting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m. } THE NEXT MEETING Or THE AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD IS SCRIOUL90 FOR WEDNESDAY, JULY 10, 19910 AT 5:30 P.M. IN THE CITY f OF DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CONFERENCE ROOM, DENTON, TEXAS. i i i 1 i i E~lsT AVPMALT Dr~lve -la L j 4e' "siGopos~o ' h /p@1~OC~))SED Z„ ' f~4tl4j .ct /lPP~ ? fie') ~ ~ta6 Y'J~ ) ~'ch/JC A»gon, cohyCtA~F' 4 sP'~ sae - r ; Alc-w ASPHALT • ~ ' 1' ~oY E'HlYtnd Aarh+fE ~ 1 'I ~ ~ ' Ti Bar ~ilin f'ir G~w wya' ~►'t EXfST fPY444T x,ar C]^ RA/:JAC~E SZN~ILi^` I eu~aY / pp~' ~ pr.oc~ / '~a % ro~ / 1 i J y 1 1 E METAL I JI{t pFUVti; LS 119 4G pt t't NftltfyO.CO loss c. eq, t of-) I ~ tf { ff ~ 3~~.er '~1 ` Ito4~''B . I$ `A'FY c ~ YQ a ~ ~ e 1 M ~ r + 1 D {t 1 M lit 1 # t I a~ <n i t August 20, 1991 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM f ~ OF THE CITY COUNCIL MAYOR AND MEMBERS TO: FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager RE: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES PROVIDING HYDROPOWER OPERATIONS AT LEWISVILLE DAM; AND EFFECTIVE DATE. I. RECOMMENDATION: j , The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of August 14, 1991, recommended to the City Council approval of some changes to the executed Memorandum of Agreement. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: On September 180 1990, the City Council approved this MOA. On November 2, 1990, the Corps of Engineere (Carps) recommended ` some minor changes to the operation and regulating plan of the executed MOA. In reference to the operation agreement, wording revisions are recommended under Articles it II0 III, and IV (sections A & B). Denton agrees to add a new paragraph under Article IV (section A) which states that the City of r Denton shall operate the hydro project in accordance with the 3 license, the terms of this agreement, the Crops' Lewisville Lake operation and Maintenance Manual, Reservoir Regulation Manual, Flood Emergency Plan, and the City of Denton Regulating Plan. Under Article IV (section B), a new paragraph No. b is added which requires the City to develop an emergency action plan to ensure dam safety. Denton agrees to the prepayment to the Corps for inspection and reporting at two year intervals for the first four years, and five year intervals for the subsequent years ur.der Article V. A new Article VIII is added that relates to damages under release of claims. Under the Regulatory Plan, Article II is deleted because regulations is not needed during construction, PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric costs for rate payers, Electric Utility Department for maintenance and operation, t k nir~°ll18 JN• T d U city council Agenda Item Page 2 ` FISCAL IMPACT! the rojpct is ;5,017,124. The The total esvimated Coat of P hydro unit wall generate approximately 13,U00,000 kilowatt hours annually. b fi ttedrr.ell, City XOY, i Manages' Prepared/Approved by, /O~Execut Direct Nelson# of Utilities Exhibit T Resolution of Agreement qI Memorandum III PUS Minutes of August 14, 1991 _I CC82091.01 ,r ' }+k JkTelm Z F, e:xpdocs\teuts.r a RESOLUTION NO- ER y A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MAND THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AN sHING FOR CORPS OF ENGINEERSr EDSATMABRND PROVIDOLNGDFORSAN EFFECCTIVEwDATEF. ~ TIONS AT LEWISVIL ` THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION i• The City manager is authorized to execute an agreement between the City of Denton and the Department of the Army, Corps of. Engineers establishing procedures for hydropower operation by the City of Denton under the terms and conditions contained in the agreement attached hereto. I IO That Resolution No. R90-049 is repealed. } SEC III, That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. day of PASSED AND APPROVED this the 1991. f i BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR I ATTEST! JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY { BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DMA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY. r- w r S 4 3 • t s i MEMOR/INDUM OF AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR HYDROPOWER OPERATION BY THE CITY OF DENTON r PURSUANT TO FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSE- f + EXISTING DAM FERC PROJECT NO, 3940 i This Agreement, entered to and effective this day c of , 19_, by and between the DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Corps of Engineers (hereinafter referred to as the "Corps", acting by and through the Southwestern Division Commander, and the City of Denton, Texas (hereinafter referred to as the "COD"), acting by and through its City Manager, WITNESSETH, THAT WHEREAS, the United States is the owner a?,d operator of Lewisville Lake, the associated lands and appurtenant works located on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River, waters of the f United States in Denton County, Texas= and, WHEREAS, COD was issued a iicende on March 27, 1984 by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to construct, operate and maintain hydroelectric faoillty, project number 3940, at Lewisville Dar., located on the Elm Fork above Lewisville, Texasi anJ WHEREAS, the Fort Worth District Corps of Engineers is responsible for the daily operation and integrity of Lewisville Dam; and WHEREAS, Article 39 of the FERC License requires COD to enter into Memorandum of Agreement with the Corpa, describing the mode of hydropower operation, design, and construction as acceptable to the Corps: any WHEREAS, COD has entered into Supplemental Agreement No. 1 on December 140 1988, with the City of Dallas to amend the Untreated Water Contract which is dated August 7, 1985, { According to the supplemental agreement, Dallas will not 1 exercise its right to transport water in apipeline from o.. ue? ~r 1 r UAA mS 3 R 7 r { 3 LEWISVILLE OPERATING PLAN PAGE 2 until the Lewisville Lake to Elm Fork Water Treatment Plant, tonoo ear 2005. Dallas will noratoraont theeLewisville tLake tlow flow hydroelectric turbine gene the city of Dallas for water conduits which are utilized by ~i supply releases; and llas a blind COD agrees to provide at no cost to Da E' stream from the hydroelectric unit for r 1 flange connection up line for Dallas' future uaef and Dallas to connect a pipe W ZF0RZ, the parties agree as follows$ ARTICLE I RIGHT TO REVIEW AM REVISE 1 - - rating Agreement The this operating request of Corps and COD recognize that is subject tosreview oraCing ex~riencemisuq fined and as either party conditions warrant. .0min. in effect This Operating Agreement $h all routed by all parties revised by written ARTICLE 11 - PHYSICAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION the FERC license, The hydropower described in th - is hydroelectric 0 kw horizOA incits on* 217011 outdoor ttype substation ted generarating powerhouse to step up the generator adjacent to the voltage to 24.9 kv, powerhouse is to be located approximately 53 feet east of the el to terhoure are Rivero ZJJA fork The existing discharge chann The outside dimensions of then pow 1009, The penrtook approximately 42 feet wide by 42 r running trom the two 60-inch diameter will cc outlet worksOvelve pitwetThe tape ou -inch diameter n e S4 -inch i gg iraoe will be penstock will canvergh to a sing penstock running otnrbinerdiacharges,through the new required to direct channel to Elm Pork River. I i 1 1 ~h ~;AIYJ WY i 1 1 LEWISVILLE OPERATING PLAN PAGE 3 works valve pit* The BA~inchidiametereQenstocktrunninglto converge will be required to direct the turbine inlet. A tailrace turbine discharges through the new channel to Elm Fork River, ARTICLE III - COOPERATION 1 eat will not 1, The operation of the hydropower proje sell COD impact existing authorized project Q rpo agrees to operate the hydropower project accorrdiner to the Corps operating requirements. The hyd pow project will be operated to protect Federal interests, including, but not limited to, the iliotd cofnt~isville impoundment and flood release capab Dam. The Corps agrees topcooperate in operation isn of the hydropower prof consistent with Federal interests and with the Corps ' responsibilities for maintaining the floo control of function of the project. The Corps all release rates through the hydroelectric project. vide the Corps Reservoir Control 2, COD agrees to pro 083Q hours each section with daily project data by day. This data shall consist of the 0800 hoursdrelease rate in cubic feet per second (CFs)~ turbine and bytiass release for the period midnight to hourssgoof generation andfinegawatt)hours ofegeneration ! om midnight to midnight. 3. COD agrees to notify the Corps Reservoir Control shalloprovidenhome phone numberstforousedur~9 Corps non-duty hours. - OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS ARTICLE IV SECTION A, GENERAL -r_r_r_-„ The COD shall operate the hydropower project in accordance with eersLiLewisvi.lleeLak Operation and MintenanceCManualf Engine t [La C.;o.ti 11 tfE ~.t i i t LEWISVILLE OPERATING PLAN PAGE 4 the Lewisville Lake Reservoir RegulabingePlan Lewisville Flood Emergency Plan for Lewisville hydropower project ( Attachment 1). The corps is, and shall remain, responsible for development and revision of the Lewisville Lake Reservoir Regulation Manual. The Corps is responsible for providing the COD copies of the current Manuals and Regulation Schedule, and revisions as they are adopted. This Agreement and Attachment 1 shall be made an appendix to the Lewisville Lake Reservoir Regulation Manual, The COD shall operate the hydropower project at all times in such manner as deemed necessary by the Corps to ensure that flood control, dam safety, contractual obligations under contrac No, are met. ifEthe2Corpsad tehrminestthatzad project pu purpopo zed or situation exists pu threatens contractual project ct purposes follow Corps of Engineers directives and/or insto ctions pertaining to the operation of the hydropower p j SECTION E. SPECIFIC OPERATIONAL DETAILS 1. The Corps is responsible for thePoperati Agreement, Lewisville Dam and Lake. Under this the hydro project shall be operated as a run,of-river project. The Corps shall control the existing Corps' valves remotely from the Lewisville project tower house. The hydroelectric plant operation shall be fully automatic using a Supervisory control system for the wicket gates, tur contr system willeallowtCODdtoommoonitorlreleasesrthrough theoi sys powerhouse. 2. Attachment 1 "Regulating Plan" ineorporst2d horein and made a part hereof, summarizes operation modes during release normal# high, and flood releases. The will depend upon the elevation of the lake; whether the release is for conservation or flood control; and whether the flow rate is usable for generation. 3. COD agrees to notify the Corps within one hour of the ps ornitstdesignee advised of anyCchange ein generation ethat 1 r f i i LEWISVILLE OPERATING PLAN PAGE 5 affect the flow of water through the hydropower project or cause fluctuations in Lewisville Lake. 4. The COD agrees to permit the Corps, when the hydropower project is being remotely operated, to take whatever emergency action is needed to prevent or reduce a hazard to human life, and to prevent significant fluctuation of Lewisville Reservoir. COD agrees that under these emergency conditions it will operate the unit as directed by the Corps. i S. The Corps has the authority to direct COD to stop hydropower project operation so that maintenance or repairs may be affected to any part of the outlet works and outlet works channel, should such be deemed necessary. The Corps will provide as much prior notice as possible for any such outage. 6. The City of Denton will develop and utilize an emergency action plan for operating the hydropower project. This plan will define the COD role to ensure dam safety, especially emergency notification pprocedures. The COD plan will work in conjunction with the Corps' Flood Emergency Plan for Lewisville Lake. ARTICLE V INSPECTION COD shall permit the Corps to inspect the hydropower i project as a part of the Corps' Periodic Inspection and Continuing Evaluation of Completed Civil Works Structure Program. Any operational deficiencies or difficulties detected by the Corps will be immediately reported to COD and PERC. When operational practices or deficiencies may result in a situation causing imminent danger to the Corps operation, the Corps iias the authority to direct COD to stop hydropower project Operation and/or take appropriate action to resolve the problem. The COD shall provide prepayment to the Corps for the applicable portion of the estimated cost of inspection, reporting, continued obervation and evaluation of the hydropower project. Inspections are anticipated at two year intervals for the first four years, with subsequent inspections ocheduled as a part of the regular periodic inspection of Lewisville Dam. The first inspection will be i rI' 4,i j f 5 ' i k i j LEWIBYILLE OPERATING PLAN i PAGE 6 made prior to placing the hydropowsecondn in operation at an estimated cost of ;15,000. cost of inspection shall take place in April of 1993 at an estimated $110065. The third and the fourth inspections shall take 1 ! place in gay 1995 and May 2000 at estimated cost of $9,995 ' and $11,550 respectively. The Corps will provide a I preliminary schedule for inspection and will notify the COD and Federal Energy Regulatory Comission of the datef purpose and estimated cost of any inspection 60 days in advance. Any overpayment by COD will be adjusted to actual costs at the end of the Corps' fiscal year. ARTICLE VI - COMMICATION NETWORK, INFORMATION EXCHANGE, i AND REPORTING COD Power Plant Operation Representative at Spencer Road shall maintain communications between the Corps Operation Representative at Lewisville Lake by means of a direct, circuit or other direct means of oomsaunications, as directed by the District, to coordinate the operation of hydropower project, ARTICLE VII - MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES 1. Responsibilities for maintenance of various facilities associated Corps hydropower project will be divided between COD and the A, COD will maintain at its sole cost the followings 1. Powerhouse and eubsttation, including the fenced area of the sits) i 2. New penstock at all times) j 3, The powerhouse discharge channslf q. Any signs or public information facilities constructed by COD for its purposes. i l LEWISVILLE OPERATING PLAN s PAGE 7 5. Maintenance of the existing Corps Outlet ` ~ f Works Structure and Conduit, Stilling Basin, and Discharge Channel resulting from operation of the hydropower facilities. o B. The Corps will maintain at its sole cost the following: Conduit, Outlet 1. The o8 ructure maintenance of the Works 1 and Discharge Channel. 1 ARTICLE VIII - RELEASE OF CLAIMS The COD shall hold and save the "ores of Engineers free from all dannges arising from the operation and maintenance of the hydropower project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Corps of Engineers or its contractors. I ARTICLE IX - OTHER PROVISION Nothing in this Opoirating Agroment shall be deemed as a waiver ; of any requir~nt or obligation set forth in the Order issuing License issued March 27, 1984 by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or any amendments to the license. UNITED STATES CITY OF DENTON DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ; Bye Bye STANLEY 0. GENZOA LLOYD HARRELL Brigadier General, U.S,A, city ma ages n, Texaco Division Engineer City Attachments Regulating Plan 114PAOR disk#02991 i ~ F1J r~ i 3 I I j ATTACHMENT I j REGULATING PLAN FOR LEWISVILLE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT 6 This Regulating Plan ham been prepared as part of the plans and specifications for the Lewisville Hydroelectric Project, in accordance with Article 39 of the Federal Energy Regulatory ti Commission ("FERC") license no. 3940 issued March 27, 1984, and extended until March 27, 1988. To meet the Corps of Engineers requirement, the City of Denton had entered into Supplemental Agreement No. 1 on December 140 1988, with the City of Dallas to amend the Untreated Water Contract which is dated August 7, 1985. The plan describes design modes during operation of the Lewisville Hydroelectric Project. } I. REGULATING PLAN DURING OPERATION f ` A. General i This agreement is to define the procedures for the Corps and City of Denton interaction for the operation of the hydropower facilities after completion of construction. The hydroelectric project will have ten release modes: low, operating, operating and spill, flood, low-to-operating, operating-to-low, operating-to operating and spill, operating and spill-to-operating, operating and spill-to-flood, and flood-to-operating and spill. These modes are discussed below. 8. Low Flow Mods During low flow mode, less than 150 cfs, releases will be passed through the Corps outlet works. In this mode, the various parts of the facility identified below will be in the status indicateds Part of Facility Status/Party Responsible t------ 1. Outlet vork intake structure open/Corps slide gaffes. 2. 16-foot flood control conduit Closed/Corps 3. Two 48-inch Corps valves Open/Corps 4. Two 60-inch COD valves Closed+/Denton I 5 Turbine/generator off/Denton ( 6. 36-inch bypass valve Closed/Denton Optional-May be left open i t s 5 LEWISVILLE REGULATLNG P1AN Page 2 TING PLAN DURING OPERATION I. REG(lLA A. General to the ro the entoniinteraction toretheooperation This aged mett ois s f D ofrthe ahydropower facilities after Completion of The hydroelectric Protect will have lien t ronstruction, orating, operating and release modest low, op rating-to-low, operating-to flood, low-to-operating, ope and spill-to-operating, operating and spill, opairatinq operating and Pellmodeefar discuesed belowQ~rating and spill. i g, Low now mode i## less than 150 cfs, releases will outlet works In this I be passed through the corps i mode, te1v be iinstharetatustindiaatad~Y dentified below wi risible Status/Party Respo Part of Faoility open/Corps 1, outlet- work intake structure slide q Closed/Corps 2. 16-foot flood control conduit Open /Corps 3, Two 46-inch Corps valves Closed*/Denton 4. Two 60-inch Coo Valvee Oft/Denton 5, Turbine/g valve Closed/Denton 6. 36-inch bypass * Optional-Hay be left open C. Operating Node rating code, 150 to 623 cfs, During the normal ssed through the turbine. In this 1J releases will be pa of he facili mode, the variinetKeLStatustindioatedsY identified below will be Status/party Responsible Part of Facility 1. Outlet works-intake open/Corps structure slide gates Closed/Corps 16-foot flood control conduit dosed/Corps f 3, Two 48-inch Corps valves open/Denton l 4, TWO 60-inch COD valves on/Denton 6. Turbine/Generator Closed/Denton E 6, 36-inch bypass valve X14 .r r i LEWISVILLE REGULATIgo PLAN j page 3 D. gating And ill Node -----------hen high releases greater 6thraughathelcorpsn During releases will be passed e the various 1,000 cfr, in this mod sill be in the outlet wo and turbine, ified below parts of the facility ident status indicated: status/Party Responsible -w_r w_r w_--w_rr..._ Part of Facility Open/Gores 1, Outlet works intake e gates Closed/Goths structure slid 2, 16-foot flood control conduit OPon/Ccrpr valves open/Denton 3, Two 4$-inch Corps lves on/Denton 4, Two 60-inch COD va Closed/DOnton 5, Turbine/Gentvalve 6. 36-inch byPass g. Flood Mode s During -flood mods greater than 1,000 code+rtheavpxiahl be controlled by the Corps. in this mod facility identified below viii be i,n the of the a Pam status indicated: Status/party Responsible part of Facility --------------w As required by Corps 1. outlet works intake Open ! Carps structure slide gates it As r*uir4~d by Corps 2. 161-foot flood od control condu Closed'/Dotvton 30 Two 49-inch Corps valves Ott/Denton 4. TWO BO-inch COD valuer Close&DOnton 5. Turbine/generator j 6. 36-inch bPase valve w optional-May be left open } l~ 1 LEWISVILLE REGULATING PLAIT Page 4 ` j i F. Transition From Low to operating Mode + During transition from 1063 than 150 cfs to (150-623) cfs, the various parts of the facility identified below will be in the status indicated: Part of Facility status/Party Responsible 1, outlet works intake Remain Open/Corps structure slide gates i 2. a.6-foat flood control conduit RClose/CorpsCorps 3. Two 48-inch Corps valves ~n/Denton 4, Two 60-inch COD valves gtart/Denton Turbine/tvalve Remain Closed/Denton 6g. . 36-inch bypass G. Transition From operating to Low Mode During transition from (150-623) cfs to below 150 cts, P the various parts of the facility identified below will be in the status indicated: Part of Facility Status/Party Responsible 1. outlet-works-intake Remain open/corps structure slide gates 2. 16-foot flood control conduit Remaiin/C ed/ 4, Corps Te ch Corps valves 0 40-inch 4, Two 60-inch COD valves Close,r/Denton top/Demon 5. Turbine/Generator Stop/Denton top/DentoalLy- 6. 36-inch bypass valve open manually/Denton *Optional - limy be left open l i ] ULt"iip:!} LEWISVILLE REGULATING PLAN Page 5 H. Transition from Operating to Operating and spill Mode During transition from 623 cfs to 1,000 afs, the various parts of the facility identified below will be in the status indicatedi Part of Facility Status/Party Respons+,ble _ _ 1. Outlet works intake n/Co--s structure slide gates 2. 16-foot flood control conduit Remain Closed/Corps 3. Two 48-inch Corps valves open/Corps 4. Two 60-inch COD valves Remain Open/Denton 5. Turbine/Generator On/Denton 6, 36-inch bypass valve Remain Closed/Denton 1. Transition from Operating and Spill to Operating Node - During transition from 11000 cis to operatin mode- _ ~ (150-623 cfs), the various parts ggll identified below will be inthestatus the indicateds Part of Facility status/Party Responsible 1. Outlet works intake open/Corps structure slide gates 2. 16-foot flood control conduit Remain closed/Corps 3. Two 46-inch Corps valves Close/Corps 4. Two 60-inch COD valves Remain Open/Denton 5. Turbine/Generator On/Denton 6. 36=inch bypass valve Remain closed/Denton i I i r ~ES`JJ17$`' A LEWISVILLE REGULATING PLAN Page 6 1 L. Transition from operating and Spill to Flood Node - - - For releases from (623-1,000cfe) to above 1,000 cfs, the various parts of the facility identified below will be in the status indicateds Part of Facility Status/Party-Responsible 1, outlet works intake As required by Corps structure slid(s gates 2, 16-foot flood control conduit open/Corps 3. Two 48-inch Corps valves As required by Corps 4, Two 60-inch COD valves closed*/Denton 5, Turbine/Generator Stop/Denton is 6. 36-inch byp&AX valve (open Automatically- Closed Manually) /Denton optional-Play be left open V, Transition from Flood to operating and Spill For-releases from above 11000ofs-to (623-1000) ofs, the various parts of the facility identified below will be in the status indicated: Part of Facility Status/Party Responsible i33 I 1, outlet works intake structure slide gates Open/Corps 2, 16-foot flood control conduit Closed/Corps 3. Two 48-inch Corps valves As required by Corps 4. Two 60-inch COD valves SOpeen~D*nton 3, Turbine/Generator 6. 36-inch bypass valve Remain Closed/Denton LLREG disk9z72991 0.1 1 _ i I VIII ~ II !CL CtI:11AG CAN 1 I I I' 05L @ 'NAt(0. JPPL4 PIPE 10 IISX nA1QN11x IX ISRN4 pSTWM11gN XL . MEW MNS[0Ln L%IST IN4 VAl4[ V141.1 [IISiIN4 INTdn[ 1! - SIPUGI URC {YI 11NG ! PI/[ ~zr'= - - - - ~ [%ISTIN4 S(<VRIIC f(N<INO --EXIIIIING I Will( LHANNIt Y i - - ' ~ ~[%1311HG p' S PIP[ . KCL53 `IAISTING r.UMING WT I l I N ~ p I I -EV 310.0 1 It 4A1p ILL 4q I' CL. tf1F e>T_ I u. 1 'Nstp 3-16.0 tm 0 P 1001, tt%u PMPfl~fy , LtMt"LL[ NNauu4r[w P*1024( ru, I' t Em m l.I j I /L j !N'%g tVIL1 1 'M A' 0 NIP wPl`L'[,.!p IM . Yyi3LI~~idU+t•'dIIWILIKIYNI>4+....a.......a--.-......_ k t i j 1 l EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOAR~D1 MINUTES August 14, i 9. CONSIDER MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT #1 WITH THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS FOR ESTABLISHING OPERATION PROCEDURES FOR LAKE LEWISVIliLE HYDRO OPERATING AGREEMENT. FERC NO. 3940. h Corps Of Joe Cherri stated that this nq of15,OOOteverry other year EngineerR would include a payme for inspections. After the fifth year, there would be one (1) payment every five years for inspections. Coplen asked if there was any negotiations with the Corps? the reor nLaney ded. ma Alla motion not nayaCgpinotiort Riden no. agreement; h carried. l 's I { i l A rA,J. yn.. 1 ` r Y i i A August 20, 1991 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manag3.r RE: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN TEE CITY OF AENTON, TEXAS AND T'B'H DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR HYDROPOWER OPERATION AT LAKE RAY ROBERTS DAM, AND PRC'rTDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. RECOMMENDATION: The Public UI-11ities Board, at their meeting of August 140 19910 recommended to the City Council approval of some changes to the executed Memorandum of Agreement. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: } On September 18, 1990, the City Council approved this MOA. On November 2, 1990, the Corps of Engineers (Corps) recommended some minor changes to the operation and regulating plan of the executed MOA. In reference 1 to the operation agreement, wording revisions are recommended under Articles I, II, III; and IV (sections At 3), Denton agrees to add a new paragraph under Article IV (section A) which states that the City of Denton shall operate the hydro project in accordance with the license, the terms of this agreement, the Corps' Ray Roberts Lake Operation and Maintenance Manual, Reservoir Regulation Manual, Flood Emergency Plan, and City of Denton Regulating Plan. Under Article IV (seotion B) new paragraph No. 6 is added which requires the City to develop an emergency action plan to ensure dam safety. Denton agrees to the prepayment to the Corps for inspection and reporting at ; two year intervals for the first four years and five f year intervals for the subsequent years under Article V. A new article VIII is added that related to the damages under release of claims. Under the Regulatory Plan, Article II is added because regulations is not, needed during cont3truction. i k 14-CITY COUNCIL AGWDA iTEX PAGE-2---------------- - PROGRAM'Sr DEPARTM~TS OR GRROUPS ~~CT" utility • rate payers, Electric - coats for Electric for maintenance and oPeration• Department 1 ` j FISCAL I14PAC7" the project is $3 total x922'7400 estimated cost enerate approximately The unit will g { The hydro ! kilowatt hours annually- Respectfull Ll y y submitted, ~V• Y fiarrelli C tY Ma 9eT ` , d V 1 , Prepared by: Joe Cherri, P.E. Project Manger Approved by: .E. Nelson I Executive Director Of Utilities E 1 a Exhibits: II. Resolution of Agreement. Miyutes o August 14r 1991. Memorandum IYI, puhli.e Utilities Board of Aug y 1 E 4 r a:updocs\robe~ts.r a ti }F. RESOLUTION NO- TE A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON H TEXAS, ANND THE DEPARTMENT OF THEEARMY7' CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR HYDROPOWER OPERA- ~ TIONS AT LAKE RAY ROBERTS DAM, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION I. The City Manager is authorized to execute an forment of the hydropower establishing Depart agreement be of Engineers City Army, operation by the City of Denton under the terms and conditions contained in the agreement attached hereto. SECTION JIr That Resolution Nor R90-050 is repealed. ! f ON I. That this resolution shall become effective EC I immediately upon its passage and approval. s ; PA5ST:0 AND APPROVED this the day of 1991. s I) BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR j i • ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY j APPROVED AS TO LEGAL F0't2M: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: EE r. k Yv t 09k1}yt t 7 t 1 1 { MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT 1 ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR HYDROPOWER OPERATION BY THE CITY OF DENTON PURSUANT TO FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSE- EXISTING DAM FERC PROJECT No. 3939 This Agreement, entered to and effective this day of , 19_, by and between the DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Corps of Engineers (hereinafter referred to as the "Corps'% acting by and through the Southwesten Division Commander, and ` the City of Denton, Texas (hereinafter referred to as the j "COD"), acting by and through its City Manager, E WITNESSETH, THATs f ~ WHEREAS, the United States is the owner and operator of Ray Roberts Lake, the associated lands and appurtenant works located on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River, waters o1 the j United States in Denton County, Texas; and, WHEREAS, COD was issued a license on March 20, 1985 by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FL+RC) to construct, operate and maintain hydroelectric facility, project number 3939, at Ray Roberts Dams located on the Elm r4rk above Denton, Texas; and i WHEREAS, The Fort Korth District Corps of Engineers it responsible for the daily operation and integrity of Ray Roberts Dam; and WHEREAS, Article 34 of the FERC License requires COD to enter into Memorandum of Agreement with the Corps, describing the mode of hydropower operation acceptable to the Corps/ and NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: ' t! s r, . {1 F ,,„FJ n P i i RAY ROBERTS OPERATING PLAN PAGE 2 ARTICLE I - RIGHT TO REVIEW AND REVISE The Corps and COD recognize that this operating Agreement is subject to review from time-to-time upon request of either party as operating experience is gained and conditions warrant. ' This Operating Agreement shall remain in effect until j revised Lry written amendment executed by all parties. i ARTICLE II - PHYSICAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION j The Hydropc+er Project, described in the FERC license, includes and 10200 kw horizontal-axis hydroelectric generating unit. An outdoor-type substation is located near to the powerhouse to step up the generator voltage to 13.2 kv. The powerhouse is located approximately 30 feet west of the existing stilling basin. A tailrace would extend about 60 feet downstream from the turbine dratt tube to the f discharge channel of the outlet works stilling basin. The single-unit configuration would entail the connection of a 60 - inch diameter pipe to the blind flanged bifurcation on the low-flow outlet conduit constructed by the Corps. A 193 - foot section of the 60 - inch diameter would connect to the Francis turbine. ARTICLE III - COOPERATION 1. The operation of the hydropower project will not impact existing authorized project purposes. COD agrees to operate the Hydropower Project according to the Corps operating requirements. The hydropower project will be operated to protect Federal interests, including, but not limited to, the flood control impoundment, and flood release capability of Ray Roberts Dar. The Corps agrees to cooperate in the operation of the hydropower project, provided such operation is consistent with Federal interests and with the Corps, responsibilities for maintaining the flood control function of the project. I 5 1 f~ a ; f i if O I f RAY ROBERTS OPERATING PLAN PAGE 3 2. COD agrees to provide the corps Reservoir Control Section with daily project data by 0830 hours each day. This data shall consist of the 0800 hours release rate in cubic feet per second (CFS), the mean daily turbine and bypass release for the period midnight to midnight in day second feet (DSF), and the number of hours of generation and megawatt hours of generation from midnight to midnight. 3. COD agrees to notity the Corps Reservoir Control Section within one hour of a unit shutdown. The Corps shall provide home phone numbers for use during non-duty hcurs. ARTICLE IW OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS SECTION A. GENERAL The COD shall operate the hydropower project in accordance with the License, the terms of this Agreement, the Corps of Engineers Ray Roberts Lake Operation and Maintenance Manual, the Ray Roberts Lake Reservoir Regulation Manual, the Ray Roberts Flood Emergency Plan, and the Regulating Plan for Ray Roberts hydropower project (Attachment 1). The Corps is, and shall remain, responsible for development and revf.sion of the Ray Roberts Lake Reservoir Regulation I Manual. The Corp6 is responsible for providing the COD copies of the current Manuals and Regulation Schedule, and 4 revisions as they are adopted. This Agreement and I! Attachment 1 shall be made an appendix to the Ray Roberts Lake Reservoir Regulation Manual. The COD shall operate the hydropower project at all tines in such manner as deemed necessary by the Corps to onsurs that flood control, dam safety, contractual obligations i under contract No. DACW63-80-C-010:3, and other authorized project purposes are met. If the Corps determines that a situation exists which threatens these authorized or contractual project purposes, the COD shall immediately follow Corps of Engineers directives and/or inotructions pertaining to the operation of the hydrnrkwer project. SECTION So SPECIFIC OPERATIONAL DETAILS 10 The Corps is responsible for the operation of ys. i t it RAY ROBERTS OPERATING PLAN PAGE 4 Ray Roberts Dam and Lake. Under this Operating Agreement, the hydro project shall be operated as a run-of-river project. The COD shall control the Corps' low flow regulating valve which is being supplied by COD. The regulating valve shall be capable o being manually or remotely and the Corps will be provided with a key to access the valve for emergency operation should the ti need arise, The hydroelectric Plant operation shall be fully autom,.rtic using a supervisory control system for the wicket gates, and turbine/generator, The remote control system will allow COD to monitor releases through the powerhouse. I 2, Attachment I "Regulating Plan" incorporated herein and part highreand flood releases. operation method oosrelease will depend upon the elevation of the Lake; whether the release is for conservation or flood control; and whether j the flow rate is usable for generation, i 3, COD agrees to notify the Corps within one hour of the generating unit shutdown, The COD agrees to keep the Corps or its designee advised of any change in generation that affect the flow of water through the hydropower project or cause fluctuations in Ray Roberts Lake, r 4, The COD agrees to permit the Corps, when the hydropower project is being remotely operated, to take whatever emergency action is needed to prevent or reduce a hazard to human life, and to prevent significant fluctuation of Ray Roberts Reservoir, COD agrees that under these emergency conditions it will operate the unit as directed by the Corps. S, The Corps has the authority to direct COD to stop the hyropower project operation so that maintenance or repairs may be effected to any part of the outlet works and outlet { works channel, should such be deemed necessary, The Corps will f provide as much prior notice as possible for any such i( outage. E G, City of Denton will develop and utilize an emsrgqsnoy action plan for operating the hydropower project, 12s' ~his plan i will define the COD role to ensure dam safety, especiall ( emergency notification procedures, The COD pltn will work in conjunction with the Corps' Flood Xxotgoncy Plan for Ray Roberts Lake, Y i ` 1 RAY ROBERTS OPERATING PLAN PAGE 5 ARTICLE V - INSPECT70M COD shall permit the Corps to inspect the hydropower iodic ins ' project as Ea part of valuation of CompletedrCivil Worpection and Continuing Program, Any o rational deficiencies or difficulties Program. the Corps will be immediately reported to COD detected b by ,5 I+ and pERC. When operational practices or deficiencies may the Co result in a situation iminent danQireto COD Corps, operation, the Corps has stop hydropower project operation and/or take appropriate action to resolve the problem. It The COD shall provide prepayment to the Corps for the i applicable portion of the estimated cost of inspection, i reporting, continued observation and evaluation of the hydropower project. Inspections are anticipated at two year intervals ctionsascheduledsas aupart aof~ the tregularperiodic The first inspection will be do prioior r at to Ray placiRoberto ng ng the the h hydrdropo++er plant in operation at pads pr on astimated cost of $150000. The second Inspection shall take place in April of 1993 at an estimatidnCost Of take $110065. The third and the fourth Inspec shall place in may 19915 and May The Corps estimate ocostsaof $90995 and $11,5r respectively for ins and wil D anidnP&deral schedEnergy Regulatory Commis ionlofotheydate, COD an CO purpose, and overpayment by COD inspactiolt SO to actual advance. Any overpaym»nt b { costs at thu and of the Corps fiscal year. ARTICLE VI r CONNUXICATION NETWORK, INlORMTION L'XCFMZO ......_r AND REPORTING COD's Power Plant Operation RepresentctiveSpencer shall maintain communications with the Corps operation Representative at Lewisville Lake by meant of a direct circuit or other direct means of communicationsof directed by the District, to coordinate the operation the 1xydropower project. I j ti 1, i S s i { RAY ROBERTS OPERATING PLAN PAGE 6 ARTICLE VII - MAINTENANCE REBpONSIAILTIES l 14 Responsibilties for maintenance enannceOfwilliousdfacilities associated with the hydropow project between COD and the Corps as follows. { A. COD will maintain at its sole cost the followings i 1, Powerhouse and su t 2. New penstock at all times, F ` 3, The powerhouse discharge channelt 4. AnY sign4 or public information faclities constructed by COD for its purpofac S. Maintenance of the low flow system five {6'1 em at the Ray Roberts )foot diameter low flow conduit, valve box and bifurcation. 6. Raw Mater SupplY line, valves and drain line,. f' 9. The Corps will maintain at its sole cost the followings i. The normal maintenance of the existing Outlet Works StructrChand Conduit, Stilling Sasiss and Discharge ARTICLE VIII - RELEAS>G of CLAIMS Tke Coo shall hold an~hraae ratiicCinrsndomainxenanci ofMhor all damages arising from ~ es due to the fault or hydropower proJeat, except for damsag negligence of the Corks of Engineers or its contractors. ARTICLE I% - O'rKER PROVISION as a waiver Nothing in this operating h9reement shall br doomod of any requirement or obli98tSibY the ~idirainEnergy Otd*V Ro"Istoryg License issued March 20, u RAY R08RRTS OPERATING PLAN PAklt 7 Commission, or any amendments to the license. UNITED STATES CITY OF DENTON DEPARTMENT OF THE APXY t SY r _ ay t STANLEY' G. GENZGA LLOYD HJ►RtaELI. Brioadier oenmrsll U.S.A. City manager Division Engineer City of Denton, Taxas t Attaoh"ntr Regulating Plan f di~mk#s72991 j t 4 (t e1 %i i i 1 i REGULATING PLAN FOR RAY ROBERTS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT This Regulating Plan has been prepared as part of the plans and specifications for the Ray Roberts Hydroelectric Project in accordance with Article 34 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) license No. 3939 issued March 20, 19880 and extended on April 240 1986. The plan describer design modes during operation of the Ray Roberts Hydroelectric Project. i I. REGULATING PLAN DURING OPERATIONL A. Gr4ERAL This agreement is to define the procedures for Corps and City of Denton interaction for the operation of the hydropower facilities after completion of conotruction, The Ray Roberts hydroelectric project operated and maintained by COD must be responsive to five scenarios releases below minimum turbine flaw, normal releases, flood releases below 1,000 ofs, flood rolosees above 1,000 cfs, and emergency shutdov,n. The five scenarios are discussed below. Flow releases stated are the combined releases through the turbine J and the Corps low flow release pipe and flood release conduit as are required, B. Releases Below Minimwa Turbine Flow (0-38 ofs) 1. Releases in the 0-38 cfs range, COMPONENT POSITION RESPONSIBILITY . Low Flow Gates Flood Gates Closed Coo ps 60" COD Valve Closed COD T-G Wicket Gatos Closed COD 48" Low Flow Opened to COD Regulating Valve Req'd Flow 20 Transition from normal releases to releases below minimum turbine flow, 1 COD will inform the Corps that COD will be shutting down the turbine isainently, The COD will, at that time, open the 48 inch valve to the desired flowrate as instructed by the Corps, COD i i } q . i, F F s i RAY ROBnRTS REGULATING PLAN PAGE 2 will shut the turbine down using normal shutdown procedures. Once the turbine wicket gates are closed, the 60 inch COD valve will be closed by COD. COD will notify the Corps that the shutdown is complete, 1 3. Transition from releases below minimum turbine f flow to normal releases. Turbine wicket gates have remained in the closed position. COD will open fill valve and fill penstock if needed, COD will open 60 inch COD valve full open, COD will proceed to normal turbine-generator start-up procedures, opening wicket gates to i desired release flow-rate, COD will inform the Corps that the turbine is passing the desired flowrate. The COD will regulate the 48 inch low flow valve as instructed by the Corp*. C, Normal Releases (39-525 oft rrrrr..rrrrrr.....rrrwwr..rr rrr 10 operation in the 39-160 oft range. P' COMPONENT POSITION RESPONSIBILITY wrrr rr-rr---- Low Flow Oates Fully open Corps Flood Gates Closed Corps 60" COD Valve Fully open COD T-G Wicket Gates Open t' Req'd COD Flow 45" Low Flow Closed COD Regulating Valve ' 2, operation in the 161-525 cfr range. COMPONENT POSITION ROUPONSIBILITY rrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrr rrr.~rrrrrrrrr { Low Flow Gates Fully open r Corps i Flood dates Closed Corps 60" COD Valve Fully Open COD T-G Wicket Gates Open to Req'd COD Flow 40" Low Flow open toReq'd COD Regulating Valve Flow 3 t 4 RAY ROBERTS REGULATING PLAN PAGE 3 i 3. The transitions to and from normal releases from the low flow extremes are discussed in Section S, 4. The transitions to and from normal releases from flood releases below 11000 ofs are discussed in Section D. D. Flood Releases (525-11000 of*) - - 1. Operation in the 525-1000 cfs range, COMPONENT POSITION RESPONSIBILITY Low Flow Gates Fully open corps Flood Gates open corps 60" COD Valve Open COD ` T-G Wicket Gates Open COD 48" Low Flow open to Rsq'd COD Regulating Valve blow 2. Transition from normal releases to flood pleases, 1,000 ofs and below. i The Corps will open their flood gates to release thi desired flow. The 46 inch Corps valve will remai;t open. The 60 inch COD valve will remain open and the turbine will continue to operate. 3. Transition from flood releases, 1,000 cfs and below, to normal releases. The Corps will close their flood gates and COD { will regulate the 40 inch flow valve as instructed by the Corps. The 60 inch COD valve will zemain open. E, Flood Releases Above 1,000 cfs rY I 1. Operation during flood control, COMPONENT POSITION RESPONSIBILITY rrrrrr--r rrr-rrrr r.Yrrrrrrrr.r. Low Flow Gatos Fully open corps flood hates open corps 60" COD Valve Cloood COD T-G Wicket Gates Closed COD 48" Low Flow Open Full Corps Regulating Valve I i P. t l r i i I RAY ROBERTS REGULATING PLAN f PAGE 4 2. Transition from flood releases below 1,000 cfs to flood releases above 1,000 of*, j The Corps will inform COD of their intention to go to flood stage releases above 1,000 ofe, COD will shut the turbine down using normal shutdown f 1 procedures. Once the turbine wicket gates are closed, the 60 inch COD valve will be closed by COD, COD will inform the Corps of their action. Corps will regulate their flood fates to release the desired flow, F 3. Transition from flood releases above 11000 cfs to k flood releases below 1,000 cfs. The Corer will inform COD that they are releasing ~ below 11000 cfs, COD will crack their 60 inch valve to fill the penstock. COD will proceed to normal turbine-generator start-up procedures, opening the COD 60 inch valve, FEmergency Shutdown r I.,---------------- I ! Emergency shutdown procedure, COD will notify the Corps that COD have experienced an emergency shutdown, COD will close the 60 inch COD valve. The COD will open the 46 inch low flow regulating valve as instructed by the Corps, L 2, The transition from the emergency shutdown to normal operations will be as detailed in a, 3 above. ff RRREGHYDRO diskz72991 i w!. I 1 ! u. !Vn b nnP lllU) h-_I fy --y i r 1}133,3ter 1 i _ Rftugc ut~nrv,l ii''m vlVt t ~ 2Vrg65'UIP / SIT II - =1- Y ---I}!Mf)r~Y)SJI L141 l 1 rrM N4!l Pf~ M 4<Y YO ViM I v <Yl,w,wai ~k rl7,~LA Ham.- I 1 fi ssih i ,~hvFili nr «rnrrl.Ft r~~nns cnraawroa,ui~Lu~ ' xnr noKet/ H.o~auanw Harter rygfX hMit 7q cY 1~i11o M~a+~.i i 1 EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES August 14, 1991 EI 1 10. CONSIDER MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT #1 WITH THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS FOR ESTABLISHING OPERATION PROC8DURES FOR RAY ROBERTS HYDRO OPERATING AGREEMENT, FERC NO. 3939. Ridens made a motion to accept the agreement= Frady seconded. All ayes, no nays, motion carried. i i f ~ r I i 1 S 4 r i CITY COUNCIL a , f ~ ii i I O~p~a~dopr c ~ D~ J p aa~ w Op~~ r b s e ,M r~Q~ ooa ,H, ac aaa° j - 1 t VA AMA 1~~11]i i Jwl r11 { S t , S NOTICE OF EFFECTIVE TAX WC i1 1991 property Tax Was in City of Denton s 1991 property tax rates for City of Denton, It presents information about three tax rates. ixs last yo. Thils Sineboth if You property t~ unit used determine This notice concern e actual rate the taxing ast before taxpayers can Last effecti yearve's to tax r raatete is would thimpose the same total taxes as 1 year the total amount of taxes by the viding unit can state law set . The rdtes are given . Th is year's rollback tax rate is the highest tax rAte db di taxing yearstasrt tax rollback Procedures. In each case thewi a djuStments nasre9uired by tax base (the total value of taxable property) per $100 of property value. $ 9,423,113 Last year's fast rates $ 4,2860800 Last year's operating taxes $ 13,709,91? + Last year's debt taxes $ 2,09217961473 Last year's total taxes ; 65514100 f Last Year's tax base Last year's total tet rote ' l $ 13,637,097 This year's affective tax rates Last year's adjusted taxes (after subtracting taxes on lost property) $ 1,937,465)962 This Year's adjusted tax base (after subtracting value of new property) $ .7039/$100 a This year's effective tax rate $ ,7249/$IOC x 1,43 mum rate unless unit publishes notices and holds hearings Maxi 9,119,848 This yedN's rollback tax ratet taxes (after subtracting taxes on lost property) $ Last Year's adjusted operating $ 11937,466,962 This Year's adjuaivd tax base $ ,4701/$100 This year's effective operating rate $ ,5083/$100 X 1,08 This year's maximum operating rote $ ,2161/;100 + This year's debt rate $ ,7244/$100 i M This ybar's rollback rate 4 i 1 4763F 08/16/91 i i j SCHEDULE At Unencumbered Fund Balances The following balances will probably be left in the unit's property tax 4 accounts at the end of the fiscal year. These balances are not encumbered by a corresponding debt obligation. projected Balance Type of 'Pro erti Tax Fund $ 3,719,946 General Fund $ 697,314 General Debt Service Fgnd SCHEDULE Os 1991 Debt Service the fallowing amounts for long-term m de pts that are from The unit plans to pdU' lbe pal. secured byy property taxes. These amounts will be p icable Fill revenues (or additional sales tax revenues, if app t Principal & Interest Requirements for 1991-92 n eras.. o Description of Debt r no a $2,7530532 5},745,000 $1000$,532 100 E 1986 General Obligation Refunding 175,000 2260100 400110lOO 1987 General Obligation 260000 270600 166,390 1987 Certificates of obligation 120,000 46,390 409ob38 19$7A Certificates of Obligation 175,000 234063(5 441,800 1988 General Obligation 176,000 266,$00 60,$00 1984 General Obligation 260000 250800 2730526 1989 Certif•lcatos of obligation 1760000 9$,625 2 ~ 1989A Certificates of Obligation 10 000 6L361 - 1991 Certificates of Obligation $2,626,000 510950,750 $40 0 4 Paying Agent Fees 54.5$ $40581,750- Total required for 1991 debt service Amount (if any) paid from funds listed 3630638 in Schedule A 0 Excess collections last Year $4,2180212 Total to be paid from tpaxes in 1991 tion * Inlanecttici itshtaxese 1 in 1990 $4,21$,212 Total Debt Service Levy r r.rrr+rrr+.rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrr.....rrrrrrrrrrrrr MM........rrrr rrr This notice contains a summary of actual effective and rollback tax rate alculations, You can inspect a copy Of the full calculations at the Office c 216 E, McKinn y, , Texas, of the city Secretary, Name of person preparing this notices THarl reasurer Jefferson i Citlat August 130 1991 Date Prepared, 4764E v"` , a i pFa fry ~ CITY of DENTON, TiXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKiMNEY / DENTdN, TEXAS 76201 , E MEMORANDUM DATE: August 12, 1991 TO: John F. McGrane, Executive Director o inance PROM; Harlan L. Jefferson, Treasurer/' SUBJECT; Collection Rates for 1990-91 and 991-92 1 I This is to certify that the anticipated collection rate used for tax rate calculations is 100% for the 1991-92 budget year. F i The actual collection rate for budget year 198990 was i ninety-seven (97$) percent, The actual collection rate for the 1990.91 budget year through July 31st is ninety-.seven (97%) percent, These rates only include current taxes, anticipated collection rate for 1991-92 also includes delinquent taxes, rollback taxes, penalties, interest, and the additional Tax Code. penalty under section 33,07 of the Property If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. { , HP::af ~ 4765E i l 8171566.8200 b/FW METRO 434.2529 t DATEtOB/20/91 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager G SUBJECT: Authorizing a submittal for the Municipal Solid Waste Composting Demonstration Orant to the Texas Department of Health RECOMMENDATIONt Staff recommends authorizing the submittal, t SUMMARYt The Solid Waste and Enforcement and Beautification Divisions and tha Agricultural Extension Office have worked cooperatively to develop this grant request, The grant will provide funding for the purchase of materials for ninety backyard composting units. A citizen forum on oomposting will be scheduled for November. The program will v continue through August 1992, if funded. BAOKGROUNDt _I , The Texas Department of Health (TDH) receives funds from a charge on waste entering each landfill in the state. The Department is using part of the funds to make grants available on ways to reduce or recycle waste. j PROORAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: , Solid Waste Division, Agricultural Extension Offioe, Enforcement and j Beautification Division, ninety oitizens participating in the demonstration and citizens interosted in reducing waste, FISCAL IMPAOTt The request is for $19,765, The proposal requires a 50% match which j can be in-kind contributions. The in-kind contribution includes personnel salary, utilities/telephone and equipment costs. No expenditure of cash is proposed as part of the match. R ape fully subtt ' eedd f Prepared byt Ll d , arrell City Manager Cecile Carson Administrative Analyst f Approved: B 1 Ang 0o ' Director of Cor unity Servioes 0052W F TEXAS DEPART;gENT OF HEALTH BUREAU OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 1100 W, 49TH STREET, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78756-3199 (512) 458.7271 SOLID WASTE GRANT APPLICATION 2, TYPE OF GRANT: (darken Cho appropriate circle) 1, DATE RECEIVED BY STAFF: ! "X DEMONSTRATION 0 PU$LIC EDUCATION I 0 SUPPLEMENTAL & AWARENESS FOR LITTER ENFO MENT 0 APPLIED RESEARCH 0 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 0 FEASIBILITY STUDY 3. APPLICANT INFORMATION: O OTHER a. Legal Name Cit of Dontou b. Organizational Unit c, Address (include county) Enforcement d 2l5 F., ?fc Cinney d. Contactj-v_i Denton County person on matters involving application Name Cecile Carson, A(ImIntetrntive Analyst Denton, Texas 76201 Telephone ( 817)566-3512 Addres8215 V. !1cRinney, Den tan T, i 4. FEDERAL EMPLOYER I.D, NUMBER: 16201 1756000514 5. TEXAS VENDOR I.D. NUMBER: - 75-6000514 6, TYPE OF APPLICATION: ♦ New 0 Continuation 0 Revision 7' TYPE OF APPLICANT o (oi If Continuation or Revision Explain b Texas State A enc ' county vers~ty d, Council of Governments G. Other Texas poli'ttoal Subdivision f• Elements ~ h. Senior ColTege/Non stateoUniversitp or college i, Texas Corporation J, Out of State Corporation k. Other 8. PUBLISHED RFP TITLE' 'lunicipal Solid Wan, to Composting 9' PUBLISHED PROPOSAL DO 0emonetrnClon Ornnts DOCUMENT NUMBER: TRD . 0 3 10. NUMBER OF YEARS FOR WHICH FUNDING IS SOUGHT; 11, ESTIMATED PROTECT One FUNDING SOURCE 12, PROPOSED,PROJECT: First Year Total Project Start Date October 1, 1991 a• Federal $ End Date Auguet" 31,, 1992 b, Applicant '00 $ ,00 c. State $ 11,883,00 $ 00 13, IS APPLICANT WELT d. Local $ 19,765,00 $ 100 1 SOLID WASTE DISP09AI,Fggg p ANy e, Other $ 00 $ 00 REGISTRATIONS: F. Program $ 00 0 Yes (Explain) Income 00 $ 00 • No g, TOTAL 14. TO THE BEST OF MY J(N $ 31,648.00 $ ,00 ARE CORRECT, NT HAS AND BELIEF, ALL DATA IN THIS APPLICATION ARE TRUE AND THE DOCUMENT HAS S BEEN DULY AUTHORIZED gY THE COVERNINd BODY OF THE APpLIC a. Typed Name of Authorized Representative ANT, Cecile Carson b, Title Admin, e, Telephone Number d. Signature of Authorized Representative Analyst 817-566-8532 e, Data ( August 14, 1991 t 11 IN-KIND CONTRIBUTION PERSO JL-NF..L_ ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST $3,248 AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION AGENT $61?80 TOTAL $8,528 i . 1 FRINGE BENEFITS $1 L 1l I TOTAL PERSONNEL $9, 8'E3 4 i (ITTLITIES AND TELEPHONE $ 2,10 EQUIPMENT ITRUCKS,MAINTENANCE) $1,844 WORD PROCESSING TOTAL OTHER TOTAL IN-KIND $1;883 j , i r { i i • `5 GRANT REQUEST PERSONNEL ADMINISTRTATIVE INTERN $S,h? PER HR $ 4,780 FRINGE BENEFITS 625 TRAVEL 300 SUPPLIES Ci1MPOSTIN6 KITS $10,200 FILM, DISPLAY, RECYCLED PAPER --AlUo TOTAL SUPPLIES 10,7510 OTHER BROCHURES/HANDOUTS E 1,600 UTILITY INSERTS 2 8 $500 10000 POSTAGE 580 ! COPIES TOTAL OTHER 3310 TOTAL GRANT R,ISQUEST $19.j 70. i I , , i TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH BUREAU OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 1100 WEST 49TH STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS 78756-3199 (512) 458-7271 SOLID WASTE GRANT FUNDING SUMMARY FCINDING REQUIREMENTS REQYEARE}1FOR ANTICI YEARP 2ED ANTICI YE11RP 3ED ANYIE0P44ED TOTAL BY BOURCE o $ 0 $ 0 - i 15. FEDERAL FUNDS ~ i 16. APPLICANT FUNDS (EXCLUDING IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS) 17. APPLICANT IN-KIND 11,883 CONTRIBUTIONS (ATTACH DETAILED EXPLANATION FOR YEAR #1) mmwwmmm~ 18. STATE FUNDS 19,765 t (SOLID WASTE GRAHT13) mp~ 19. LOCAL FUNDS t ` 20. OTHER FUNDS (IDENTIFY SOURCES 4 AMOUNTS) 21. PROGRAM INCOME $ l I 22. TOTAL FUNDING REQUIRED $ 310648 ►IOmE ~ FOR PROJECTS GREATER THAN ONE YEAR IN DURATIONS ANNUAL CONTRACTS MAX BE REQUIRED. { t_ t. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH BUREAU OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 1100 WEST 49TH STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS 78756.3199 (512) 458-7271 f , SOLID WASTE GRANT BUDGET INFORMATION S REQUESTED YEAR NL f F7GRANTT TE GET S STATE S OLID IN-KIND ALL OTHER CONTRIBUTION SOURCES TOTAL WASTE GRANT 8528 73308 4780 Personnel $ b, Fringe Benefits 625 1115 1740 300 a, Travel 300 d Equipment > $500 ! 10,750 ' 6 e. Supplies < $500 10,750 i I C, Contrsotual g, Construction 2240 5550 h, Other 3310 i, Total Direct 19765 11,383 i~ (sum of a-h) j. Indireot Charges 1188 $ 31,6 8 k. TOTALS $ 19765 (sum of i - ,1) j l INSTRUCTIONS This foram is designed to provide a breakdown, by budget caCSgory, of the costs assooiatied with the p=posed project or program. costs should be identified for. the grant period for er21ioh funds are being requested. Any matching regvivatenrs for which the applican r intends to claim in-kind contributions must be identified for the grant period. Xf in-kind contributions are claimed, attach an itemized breakdown with dsscripmions to this form. Below are the allowable direct cost Categories to be used in the budget. These categories ere coiapatibls with this cost categories contained in federal grant applications. ALLOMASI.B AtRSCT C0gT CATROORIXSI k rrrsonuel - Costs for oalarise and wages. ,rings 1lensiits - Costs for employee benefits, i.e., social security contribution, ratirmstnt, insurance, unemployment compensation, *to. 1 i j TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH BUREAU OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 1100 WEST 49TH STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS 78756-3199 (512) 458-7271 SOLID WASTE GRANT PERSONNEL 24. PERFORMING AGENCY PERSONNEL YEAR 01 a. POSITION TITLE b. MONTHLY C. NUMBER d. PERCENT TINE e. TOTAL SALARY OF (FULL TIME EQUIVALENT) SALARY MONTHS Administrative Analyst 2707 10 12% 3248 Administrative Intern 478 10 100f5 4780 Ag. Extension Agent 1600 10 3315 5280 i P. CATEGORY 13308 TOTA'. 25. FRINGE BENEFITS RATE 13.08 j 26, INDIRECT CHARGES RATE (Identify in the space prwidbd on the back of this form the formula used to on.lculate the indirect charges.) I ill.( 4. t J MUNICIPAL SOLED WASTE COMPOSTING DEMONSTRATION GRANT j -ft;\,,%s DEPARPIF.N'i of HEALTH l'}te City of Denton, In con)+tnction with the Texas lying 1< tgricultural Fxtensiott Servic~.~Uerttou Count.', is o-tpP Cot, a grant from the Testis Department. of Healt Bul.04111Nor Solid Waste !Ianagement to develop education program on composting for Denison resident's. The grant will. provide funtli.l+g for ninety composting ttr+lty, education materials fol. 111 resident's ofthe }jectomm'i~1etCitnd kill intern to coordinate the composlsirtg pro and the Fxtenslort Service have For the last two Years worked in conperat,it7n oil tt Don't Dag It - Lawn Mainteltance Program, The grant proposal will a11ow for a similar admiuiStratlou in order to continue. to reduce recyclable and reusable waste from entt?girls the ,Innioipal Landfill. the life espeatanaY for the landfill is limited, and the space saved by composting wIL1 extend the life of the facility, i 1 PRO ~3,\L We believe the most effective and efficient composting{ system is created in the backyards This program eliminates the need for special collects of yard and organic watsto at i the curb by Residential Municipal Solid Waste personnel and will also provide the homeowner or tenant with a ttsablo product, in order to determine the best method for i.1sp in Denton and Denton County, we are proposing a demonsstvatlon of nine different alternative composting methods. Ten citizens will be selected to use each of the methods. i A ci xens forum on composting will be held to kick-off the pro .s`;and individuals interested in being detnon5trators will `l -,requested to complete an application form. Repr fit,at'ives from the City of Denton Solid Waste + Divtaio`rtt the Agricultural Extension Servioet the Keep Denton Beatitiful program, and local gardening experts will present the initial information on the program. The meeting will. be held in early November. Ninety demonstrators will be selected to participate, By including a large sample, we will Insure that a eroas section of the community wlll lie involved. Each ; demonstrator will receive a comport unit and assistance from the Agricultural Extension Service Master Gardeners and ' 'j k. wa, , 1 Pty?{ f a°. IaYa:,HU Page 2 an intern hired through tha Krar+f. to courdinae.e the activities. The Lype of unit given will be SelecCed randomly and then rev(ewed bases.( on Lhe type o hard au.:4 vegetation in the yarc,i. i U~ 1_C5 ~ The following information on the composting i,tcits has been collected by the Agricult+iral Patenyion Service on the cost. Of each type unit, 1. Wooden Pallet Holding linit $66.1:! 'L. Wire-Mesh Holding Unit $69.46 31 Snow Fence Holding Unit $64.60 4. Concrete-Block Holding UniL $66.57 o. Wood and Wire Three Bin Turning Unit $117.39 { (Price would be reduced to $129.39 depending on tools) j 6. Concrete Block Three Pin Turning Unit $119.36 71 Wooden Three Bin Turning Unit $277.76 (Price would be reduced to $229.76 depending on tools) H, ,,iavbago Can Composter $86.26 9. Worm Composting Bin $116,11 u > 1w The "itstrstors will be required to keep records of the eompor 'pile while the pile is active. The results will include the type of material used In the compost, i,e, oak volume of material leaves, grass clippings+ food waste, the added to the pile; and the volume of compost material produced. The data will be compiled by the Administrative intern for use in latter publications. A tour of the compost yards will be conducted in early summer to provide additional publicity to the program, At that time results available from November to the tour date will be released In the form of a brochure or hand out. Comments from i:he demonstrators about their success and/or difficulty with the svstem will be presented as well, . fie . 1{. I V t l t I Page 3 fhe local news media will be aislced to produc,2 feaLure ar( ides oft this Program as it develoPs• Wo will work with the Iocal press to pt•ovide detailed infornutLion on each cantpo-,ting method, Each unit wilt be eeaiuated by the taernon r.rtaLor+s, and the evaluation will be used to dot,ermine tit(- beSL ,uelhods for use in Denton, No one unit will. be recoutttletuiecl, becraulse Lhe t~fie of tnaLe rial and Sire of the proper Ly may iaupact the reytl L L s , i liC11'I Q~Y_ ~itl`r F,Iiltll~$ c ED i Several education projects will be I,tioluded, The first. will l be a tttillty bill insert asking for participatior, In the citizen forum and providing facts of composting, a bt•gclture t 4 on compost alLernatives will be prepared for distribution it batiks, schools, public buildings and other locations A fact sho et on composting will provide with each role of garbage bags distributed dul•ing the city's semi-annual garbage bag distribution. As mentioned earl icir, Lhe results will be compiled into anothe, brochure for + 3 distribution, A display on composting will be developed by the Administrative Intern for use at (]olden Triangle Ma II, fairs, schools, and public forums. The demonstrators will be used as the examples for the display. Step by step Instructions and photos will be used to show how Co set up the unit and samples of compost material will also displayed, In addition a slide show based on the results will be prepared for presentation to civic groups fraternal organizations and similar groups, The rdoults will be shared with Denton residents and other eomoluipities in Denton county upon completion. A citizens n forut>will be hold again In 191,42 to continue to provide educational materials on composting. Citizen forums will he presented in other communities by the Agricultural F;xtension Service in order to encourage composting in other communities. SUM Y_ We believe that by showing citizens the convenience of backyard composting we will be able to substantially redtiot, the volume of residential, solid waste. With approximately 25% of our residential solid waste consisting of leaves and } grass clippings, we know that programs must be developed to f reduce the amount of waste heing directed to the landfill, s tE(#11 MEMORANDUM 1 T0: Betty McKean - Executive Oirector - MSED i FROM; Tom llinck - Director of Personnel and Employee Relations SUBJECT; Response to City Council on 1991/92 Proposed Budget DATE- August 16, 1991 Betty, this memo is to respond to the City Council's request for information about increases in the proposed Supplies and Services Budgets for the Personnel and Employee Relations Department. Supplies Account The Supplies. accounts in the Personnel/Employee Relations Department funds the following line items - office supplies, books and magazines, postage, film, the employee newsletter, and computer paper. 1 The approved 1989/90 Budge% for Supplies way; $26,866. The 1990/91 overall Supplies budget approved was $36,971. The approximate $9,100 increase in budgeted amounts for 90/91 over 89/90 that were discussed with Council members last year are listed below. We had anticipated those increases and provided justification for the increased needs. That portion of the 1990/91 overall Supplies budget for the office supplies i account (08101), we requested and were approved for an increase of $8,852 for; 1. working through the recommended decisions of the Mercer Study, requiring briefings for City Council, in-depth discussions for Executive Directors, and training for Directors, 180 managers/supervisors, and 850 employees; (this necessitated several different training materials and handouts to ensure effective communication and understanding); 2, having changed the Health Insurance Program to Sanus/N.Y, Life the previous year, there was much confusion on the part of omployees. Thus, we provided monthly updates to 860 employees o.i how to access medical providers, ways to reduce costs, what changes were occurring in medical prnviders, etc.; 3, the Health Insurance Study and Evaluation, currently in progress, required the development and reproduction of 12 "thick" bid packets to prospective new health insurance carriers; 4. as authorized by City Council, we implemented the new Drug Screening Policy requiring training for 180 managers and supervisors (again, this required training materials and information on procedures to handle situations with employees; it, further, required the needed materials for them to adequately explain this change to employees); 4 1 ~Fp$µt}[ 1 fd Ylt ci);~ r V ~ Fr 7 3 i August 56, 1991 Memo to 8. McKean - Response to City Council on 1991/92 Proposed Budget page 2 6, As a part of our commitment to Affirmative Action, as authorized e by City council, we made an intensive effort for police and Fire entry exams; in of approximately 400 recruitment packets to this required the copy g ell as conducting spacial orientation j applicants, as w prospective sessions; and ~ er" intensive because of f 6, obviously, the Personnel function is highly pap lies affect . inflatlona9yeincreases cforru generalnofficeasuppmployees, r our involvement as such ,n more our operational costs in our booes and magazine We requested and received $136 additional funding account (a8)Difor sab111t1estActsinnordarotoaPreparelouerselvveshandew Americans With implementation. managers/supervisors on this upcoming We requested and were authorized by Council for $i18 additioral funding in ; the postage account (,8109) to cover mailings of the 400 Police and Fire entry exam recruitment packets, osed 1991/92 overall Thended With the prop th at $39,177, This represent P m increased funding is needed to continue thforprocessingoemp'oyA8tpayro Wi ll Mercer. We have documents to completat a$' changes the HealthelnsurancetSt,.dyYcuerrently - computer mainframe) being finalized, we and witlimprovcdaservices. Thistwpillgreauiretawill be c more cost effective open enrollment in order to significant communication effort during effectively inform employees o of new cove is i agencludadCln oupvpaoposed premium rates, etc. Thus an supplies account. Further, to ensure we conduct effective follow-up communication for eto important are expecting a increase on link The employee Newsletter is a annvarious city-wianddecQvents/ontains information on (including Health insurance, inMercer creaseaforvthlssiseSt,900nd a message from the City Manager. The prop i ~l _j 60500n s funds The Services accounts in The Personnel/special meseevicesn(employesephysicals hire of the following line items - telephones, and Civil Service yams), travel, arisongmeals dues ~ (Service publications, rogram), equipment (Xerox copier payments), P and the tuition reimbursement programo manpower services, employee training, The overall 1989/90 Budget for Services accounts were approved by City council at $57,938. RryY s'!:9ta ~y , i i t 1 Y?FTt 5 y1 Sy! t tt [ August 16, 1991 j Memo to B. McKean - Response to City Council on 1991/92 Proposed Budget I Page 3 ! Again, last year, we discussed with the City Council the Justification for ; the 1990/91 Services budget. This was approved at $66,965. The approved increase was $9,027 and were necessary to cover, 1. in the special services account (08502) - $6,462, for an anticipated 26 j " additional employee medical physicals and for funding of Police and Fire ' entry and promotional exams for the Police and Fire Departments due to retirements and turnover $ 1,600 1 Entry - 1 Entry Fire Exam ' S 2,100 i 3 Promotional Exams (Police and Fire) - $3,300 2, because of turnover in professional staff in the Personnel Department, an ? virtually every new individual in a position has come to the position with tittle formal training in the human resource management field i (Selection and Placement, Compensation/Classificcatione Benefits andlaws of specific Insurance, Training and Development, etc y (EEO/Affirmative Action, Fair Labor Standards Act, State civil Service Law, Immigration Reform and Control Act, Age Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, etc.) and the practical handling of the employment process is critically important for us to operate the City properly and legally, Thus, the Council authorized an additional $2,812 in the travel and schools and seminars accounts (08503 and 08522) to provide training and development for the new staff members in their respective professional areas; 3, the meals account (085ii - identified in the budget as prison meals) was increased an additional $1,397 because of an increase of 51 more participants and recipients at Annual Service Awards Program banquet, The 1991/92 Proposed Budget for Services expenditures is recommended at $67,392, or a $427 increase over the 90/91 Budget approved by the City Council. Although the overall increase is $427, the tuition reimbursement , account (08632) 1s proposed at $8,000. This is $4,000 above previous year's funding because, in the last 3 years, participation has continued to increase, In 1989/90, we had a total cf 34 employees receive reimbursement for completing courses toward degrees at the local universities. We are anticipating that to double participation in 1991/92, In addition, college tuition costs have been raising steadily over this time and the recent. budget approved by the State legislature increases these fees further, this ' program assists our employees in improving their knowledge in specific fields of study that benefit the City, Over the near-term, we benefit by improved ability in an employee's current ,lob, Over the long-term, the City is preparing employees to improve their candidacy for promotion, and we are ' preparing our future leaders for the organization, f i1 August 16, 1991 Memo to B. McKean -Response to City Council on 1991/92 Proposed Budget Page 4 Please let me know if you need other information or a clarification on this, Thank you, A i l Thomas W. Klinck Director, Personnel/Employee Relations } , 1 , f bmmi06^..prn , 8/16/9! V46p j , r f t Y t~ F7) wry of DEMON, rg"S MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 I M E M O R A N D U M a a e 4 T0; Steve Brinkman, Director of Parke and Recreation y . r FROM, Alicia A. Mentell, Superintendent of Leisure Services DATE; August 200 1991 j, k SUBJECT; Fee Comparison Survey Attached is a copy of a Fee Comparison Survey that includes Denton and six - d' other cities in the Metroplex. The programs listed cover different classes, trips, special activities/events, special interest) park sxenitiss and assessments. This listing is not all inclusive of every program offered by any of the cities, It does reflect some of the core program areas offered and common to most of the cities surveyed. In some instances the requested information is not readily available from the cities surveyed and is identified an such on the survey chart. Staff continues to seek this information and expects to have it in the near future, s i Alicia A. Mentell Attachment RECR9177 I h , S , 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434-2529 t ~ Au~20, 1491 FEE COWARISON STUDY PROGRAMS DENTON ARLINGTON CARROLLTON IRVING LEWISVILLE PLANO RICHARDSON CLASSES: Aerobics Fee - 3 Days $17 $24 $12 $1826 $48 91 Unit Price ;1:42 ;2.40 ;1.26 $2 X3.79 Aquatics Fee: Beg. Swim Classes $32 $27 Unit Price $4 ;3.78 5 800 $3538 X880 $67 Arts Fee - Ceramics ;16 Nov . $22 {8 ;14.50 $22 Unit Price $1.33 ;1.37 $1 ;1.67 ;5.50 $2 Day Camps Fees $87 $116 None '/40 None $90 $79 Unit Price $1.24 ;1.05 450 $1.25 ;1.98 { 411nastics II Fees $18 $28 ;30 ;10 17 0 $6 Unit Price ;1.60 $3.60 ;1:87 ;l.zfi ;2.16 ;Z.fio Pre-School Fees $51/68 N/A N/A Unit Price $1067 80 $2,12 $30 $22 }3.75 $2J7 Tennis Fee: Adult Lessons ; 6 ;38 $40 ;1 $28 Feet Youth Lessons ;36 ;4g ;1 $28 Feet Leagues $21 $26 None ~ $22/616, $261 sao ` Snp1s ;2.6 Unit Price $4;20/$4,bo 0.75/4.60/2.17 $5/6 sngls 7 wks $3.60 $0.60 adult/ ;6 $7 child Therpeutio Recreation Fees: Camps $1280 $1017 $10 w/t-shirt None None #46 ;80 Unit Price #2.25 $2 ~ Unit price equals one program hour. ,.~f. .y. ...~.~•y-~u•n .ir.e.nui.vp inn. .4..n/fan4MLLY ~M~•Y~VM l~ ~ r a V•..e!•)'.y~M:.4+eSVe.t:J Yv:Y.y{IAW`v1M[~'ft7/1 Mil i rTPs7rkY r j .tea C Pagj PROGRAMS DENTON ARLINGTON CARROLLTON IRVING LEWISVILLE PLANO RICHARDSON TRIPS Outdoor Nature Feet Backpack trip (weekend) 164 None #30 w/shirt None None $5 None Unit Price #1.78 #1:83 #6 Senior Adults Feet Trips (eetropleK) #12;60 #20/lunch #12 #10 None #3 per trip 1025 unit Price #1+66 #4 $2 #1.26 # SPECIAL ACTIVITIES! ff EVENTS 4th of July Fee None 0 Free Free-parade Free Hone Free Teens Fee - Dances 0.00 None None None None None Hone Unit Price #1.33 SPECIAL INTEREST Aquatics Feet Adult Adat: #1.00 #2;60 $1.26 #1l18 A over #1 #1/indoor #1 #1126/outdoor Fees Child Ad+a. #1.00 #2 Free under #1.26 under 600 age 6.17 #1 Free under 7 #1 3 3 yrs 6 free .s Athletics Feel Co-Rec League #300 #340 $286 #260 #165 #286 Fa11, #276 #340 SPrinq unit price 07.60 #34 $28.60 N/A #23.67 per team N/A $23 Unit price equals one program hour. l > ~1~~ a . •t14Ye1Fi'.RGSxuvmw...... . .+y }~i'Yi1l T1f4Ya~i~3iC'£k*/?3f> 1 R ~ Pan3 PLANO RICHARDSON CARROLLTON IRV ING LENISYILLE PROGRAMS DENTON ARLINGTON SPECIAL INTERESTS Privately Ornsed Privatized p~rsa6econc~ned None Golf Driving Range $1.50 Fee for a bucket of balls 35-40 1 of balls in 36-40 balls $325 for 60 buckets 26.30 wil 60.55 $5.40/100 Large p Tennis $1/6-10000 1/2 hrs $2 $1.50 for Fees Court /rson/hour $2/court/1.5 firs No charge 750 before 6Pm adults, $1.50 .112 hour Reservation $1:50~ youth AMENITIES #25/day, no dep. Free None Park Amnities 5 Free None 6 $2o ~ Feel Picnic Areas o N/A League PIay only Nona N90 o ~o None Eallfields 15 6 None None None Garden Area 0 $20/hour Nona $50/daY, no Witheatre $6 5 tables/chairs Free None $4O Fro None Sra11 26 Pedple Pavilions 0 $30 30 M-Th, $261day, Large .SU 250 peopled $260 i per day I .1 1 ~i 9a 4 ( } PROQRANS OEN70N ARLINGTON CARROLLTON IRVING I.EWISVILLE PLANO RICHARDSON ASSESSMENTS Facility Use No Ind-;10, Fam-#36, $5 (good for No Resident 0 Adult-=7, No n . Youth-s5, raw Sentors 60% disc 2 year Adult-V40 Ind-$16, Far-$50 Yth-#120 Fae "O Administrative Fee No ResiJ3nt 12-P No No No MIA Non-Resident ><7-j16 Public Relations No No No N/A No Fee k E 1ll 1 i E . .Fll,.ii. ali .e..a tiH,D~Ff,t{\ltlr5st4/+J,YV,{ltAAA4/SRIFnF.h,ti%(>Yel~riRUri{1n MS1e.c:YbM1i wW/.°,f. r{Oy<N 3IIdM( ~o,fi1~l8tA~.hSN PSJti'W!/:eaiva,.e.1'i-.. r T-.~ ~t 7 44 k l CITY OF DBNTON 199A-91 1 NINE MONTH J BUDGET ANALYSIS REPORT l~ Respectfully 5ubmiued August 16, 1991 i ` h:1 prepared By FINANCH DEPARTMENT BUP0BT OFFICi3 . I~ E' k f L I r} #t P4, l MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 IF, McK1NNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 7b2- CITY Of DgNTOK 79" ii MEMORANDUM i DATE: August 9, 1991 T0; Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager o.~ John F. McGrane, Executive Oirector of Financel FROM: UDGET ANALYSIS REPORT SUBJECT: 1990-91 NINE (9) MONTH B We are pleased to submit for your review the 1990-91 nine (9) month ?period ve Budget Analysis Report. It is an objective of the Bud et Office comprehensiM'I to produce these reports twice a year at six (6) months and nine 9) manes j assn to cethank pro1 department and viding expenditu ei estimates, g into each fiscal year. We for their cooperation and with r-~ a ort projects and estimates l This Budget Analysis -911 iSThe s r port nine (9) ts months revenue and dsal data for fiscal year 19900 expenditures and provides a comparison to budget for all budgeted fun, GENER L FUND ~Y.. The overall outlook for the General Fund is favorable. Although revenue down from previous pro3ections, expenditures are - estimates are slightly Based on department projections, the ections Fund wil estimated l . to end be in a conservative. positive position overall. The following se _ regarding , revenues and expenditures provide a summary of factors that contribute to a projected surplus. K General Fund revenues are currently estimated to be under budget by the end of r by $18+424. This anticipated shortfall is primarily due to fiscal yea the the fol lowing ,factors. o AMBULANCE SERVICE FEES are sasmreceived where previously u re orded The are now orres recorded reduction in bad debt expense due as billed. There is a crresporsvenue (see non-departmental Finance to the change in recording has be9n without an In 'addition the City a Administration a; . new a dcoljeution ie forts in th tnext "few weeks. active collection has been n retained ned to o begin ~II 1~ -i 817/566-8200 D/FW METRO 491.2529 ;<<'. R Memo to Lloyd V. Harrell August 9, 1991 Page 2 dow o ENGINEERING CHARGE TO BOND BONhavevenues a to fruiby 69,5UO as many pro,iecte ut 1 Y o WARRANT FEE revenues have dropped dramatically and a shortfall and s expected because warrants are not being p served. Recent case law has mandated that the Court overhaul warrant issuance procedures, bud o bENTDN POLICE revenues ofe alsoloComssin is an diriAct result by warrants notp being issued, Recent challenges to the violation of yy "Failure and rani estimatedal$60,000nsreduction winlpayments iof (this convictions fine.. , o PARKING FINE revenues are estimated to be down by 525;00fl, The a one ne for late payment of tickets has not yet been initiated. side, several revenue sources are estimated to come in above On the positive budget. AD VALOREM TAXES are estimated to come in above budget by $238,818. s ncrease s due to supplements received from the DCAD since issuance of the certified roll, , o INTEREST INCOME is also coming in over budget by an estimated $150,000 ecause O g er rates on long-term investments in the General Fund, o STREET CUTS are expected to generate about $100,00o in additional re hue ue to more efficient tracking and on-site insppections, has resulted in greater accuracy of charges based on the actual size of street cuts. EXPEN.DIJUREI nder General Fund expenditures are currently estimatedsevto be ings will 459 469 u u to budget. It is anticipated that year cod salary savings* approximately $2 31644 increase salaryA sa ingsr is edue than annumbereofd positions The anticipated beifig held vacant andtheexfollowing periencing ma urn veasthroughout the Genera Fund. These positions are in o CUSTOMER SERVICE is estimating to come in under budget by $131,915. s a is rimari due to SAYins from position turnover uinevarious clerical,y professional),arand Supervisory positions. ti-lli.u::11~ 4 k Memo to Lloyd Y. Harrell August 9, 1991 Page 3 o TREASURY is estimating to come under budget by #13,412. This -a-nt-cTp`ated underrun is and the primarily restructuring salary within the division, turnover of the Chi 1 o INFORMATION SERVICES ADMINISTRATION is estimating to come under budget by $20,27r.__761s savings from a late hire cofathe new GIS Data Base mAdminist ator, salary o PERSONNEL is estimating to come under budget by $110853, This ant c pated underrun is primarily due to salary savings of various professional- and clerical positions, o ENGINEERING is estimating to come under budget. by $759625. This an c pate underrun is, primarily due to salary savings from turnover in both service/maintenance and.. supervisory positions. j a STREET CONSTRUCTION is estimating to come under budget by #36,310. s`an c pate underrun is primarily due to salary savings from turnover in both service/maintenance and supervisory positions. ~}}I o FIRE PREVENTION is estimating to come under budget by $270632, This I antic pa a un errun is primarily due to salary savings from a vacancy ire the Fire Protection Engineer position. a o EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES is estimating to come under budget by This an c pa a underrun is primarily due to salary savings from two vacant positions. i o MISCELLANEOUS (non-Departmental) is estimating to come under budget by i This estimated un errun is primarily due to a reduct on in bad debt expense associated with the change in recording ambulance { services fees revenue discussed on page If The above major budget underruns are tempered by the following estimated overruns. "1 o FIRE OPERATIONS is estimating to go over budget by $140,151. This an-ticipated expenditures of overrun $137,848 associted with uanticipat d overtimes over expend o POLICE is estimating to go over budget by $8,274. This anticipated overran is primarily due to vehicle maintenance over expenditures of 1#18,813. Vehicle maintenance over expenditures are due to inordinate { police auto accidents, for which the City may see some nominal l reimbursement from the{insured's carrier, `i r,,; V41? Memo to Lloyd V. Harrell August 9, 1991 Page 4 OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS THE RECREATION FUND is projecting revenues to exceed expenditures by (;39,983. romper son o u get is somewhat misleading because the budget is based upon maximum recreation program attendance. ENTERPRISE/WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS THE ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT is projecting total for the year of -$-an operating expenses of 561,194,209. ~.,'~013 j ~,5 I 00;E WATER/WASTEWATER DEPARTMENTS are projectin venues to be an operat ng expenses of 318,384,3100 Projected revenues a 1J9>~ under budget by 52,961,900. Residential water revenue is estimated to $673,000 under budget. Commercial sewer revenue is projected to be $1,604,00 under budget due to a usage overestimation during the prior year budgeting process. The 51049000 of budgeted miscellaneous revenue associated with a joint development agreement with the Upper Trinity Regional Water District is ,T not anticipated to be received this fiscal year. Expenditures are projected ' to be $1,116,129 under budget. FUND is projecting revenues to come in under budget by s an icipated shortfall is primarily due to the 5200,000 e pS,ANITATIONN d as revenue for landfill retirement which will not be recognized. In addition, anticipated licensing fees will not be realized this fiscal year. Because of these revenue shortfalls, only $18,940 of the budgeted $200,000 for the early landfill retirement debt sinking fund will be funded. THE WORKING CAPITAL FUND estimates total revenues to exceed estimated expenditures by e Equipment Services Division (Garage) and Machine Shop anticipate revenues to exceed expenditures by $3,000 and $19000 respectively. The Warehouse Division projects revenues over direct expenditures by 582,048 which will allow sufficient funds to•cover budgeted „ debt service and administrative transfer. The remainder of this report provides revenue and expenditure detail and illustrations indicating budget performance. Please advise if I can provide any additional information for your review. j JFMcG,af Attachments 6958E .r s, t I! TABLE OF CONTENTS t M GENERAL FUND SUMMARY...... , 8 GENERAL FUND RsvENUE SY SOURCE - GRAPH.. . 7 GENERAL FUND REVENUE DETAIL.... . GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY . . HNCIMERINGICRANSPORTATION/STREET ACTUAL WENDITURES - GRAPH... ,11 POLICE AND FIRE ACTUAL EXPENDi i.~ PIJREB -GRAPH........................... 12 RECREATION FUND SUMMARY.. ....19 ELECTRIC FUND SUMMARY...... . .....17 rY WATERIWASTEWATER FUND SUMMARY. . r SANITATION FUND SUMMARY.......... .....21 WORKING CAPITAL FUND SUMMARY . 1 I~I ..E w~ t~ r I F t 1 1 .vas G 999 ~ S i'7YERNMENTAI. FUND AN Y I GENERAL FUND RECREATION FUND i YYY~~~ r 1 d I GENERAL FUND SUMMARY CURRENT YEAR BUD013T VERSUS ESTIMATE ESTIMATE OVER 1990-91 1990-91 (UNDER) PERCENT REVENUES BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET VARIANCE AD VALOREM TAXES 9,279,734 9,518,552 238,818 2,6% SALES TAX 5,244,016 5,244,016 0 010% FRANCHISE FEES 609,214 610,218 1,004 012% OTHER TAXES 440,690 450,016 9,326 2.1% W E REVENUE FEES 1,046,133 724,766 (321,367) -30.7% f '-1 FINES AND FEES 1,370,175 999,060 (371,115) -27,1% C f LICENSE AND PERMITS 245,816 224,960 (20,856) -8,5% MISC REVENUES 1,316,028 1,594,794 278,766 2112% TRANSFERS 7,285,602 7,285,602 0 0.0% TOTAL REVENUES 26,837,408 26,651,984 085,424 ) -0.7% t H.~ ~i.4n~(11J (OVER) 1990-91 1990-91 UNDER PERCENT EXPENDITURES BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET VARIANCE I~ GENERAL GOVERNMENT 484,974 474,076 10,898 2,2% CODE ENFORCEMENT 183,863 184,370 (507) -0,3% LEGAL 383,551 378,353 ~,iv$ 1,4% MUNICIPAL JUDGE 104,735 105,382 (647) -0.6% PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 791,565 776,049 15,516 2,0% FINANCE 2,380,481 2,237,145 143,336 6.0% INFORMATION SERVICES 1,073,963 11054,749 t9,214 118% MUNICIPAL SERWECON DEV 166,5441 166,540 0 010% QUEST 34,144 34,377 (233) -0.7% PERSONNEL 482,996 471,t43 11,853 2.5% " PARKS AND RECREATION 3,227,629 3,225,779 1,850 011% ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 382o069 379,733 ~ 2,336 0,696 LIBRARY 1,004,617 1,009,070 (4,453) -0,4% ENOINEERING AND TRANS 3,308,827 3,205,716` 103,111 3,1% AIRPORT 7903 77,172 2,311 3,0% FIRE 5,016,013 5~too, 182 ($4,169) -1.7% POLICE 5,766,512 3,774,7$6 (8,274) -01196 COMMUNITY SERVICES 407,406 411,011 (31605) -0.9% MISCELLANEOUS (NON-DEPT) 2,132,970 1,9351970 197,000 9,296 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 27,412,408 27,001,603 4to,$05 115% 60, IV, kb 'Q7. ~1, v zz n1::.,~ ,,h,yrl,a ~ir":ng /a9 z;, •,i, (1 3 { 1 i V t 11 q$:FU`..~~ Y { V1 GENERAL FUND REVENUE (REVENUE BY SOURCE) Millions $3a $26 _ TRANSFERS $20 ® MISC REV LIC/PERMITS FINES/FEES $16 SERVICE FEES 1 OTHER TAXES SALES TAXES ' $10 AO VALOREM $5 $0 _ '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 year ~ Flaoal Year 4 1 y GENERAL FUND REVENUE DETAII, CURRENT YEAR BUDGET VERSUS ESTIMATE I ESTIMATE OVER 3 1990/91 1990!91 (UNDER) PERCENT REVENUE DESCRIP7'10N BUDGET ESTIMATED BUDGET VARIANCE CY AD VALOREM 8,654,734 8,893,552 238,818 2,8% DEL AD VALOREM 260,000 260,000 0 010% CURRENT-P/I 120,000 120,000 0 0,0% PRIOR-P/I 135,000 135,000 0 010% I TAX COLLECTION FEES 110,000 110,000 0 OA% I AD VALOREM TAXES 9,279,734 r 9,$18,552 238,8!8 2 6% l SALES TAX 5,244,016 5,244,016 0 010% g I w SALES TAX a1d - 5,244,016 0. 0,0!(r ' FRAN-LSO 224,614 211,685 (12,929) FRAN-CITE 130,400 115,265 (15,135) -11,6% FRAN-SAMMONS 180,000 210,268 30,268 16,8% FRAN-BANKS 40,000 40,000 0 010% FRAN-TU ELECTRIC 34,200 33,000 (1,200) -35% FRANCHISE PEES 609;214 bt0,211 t,004 ! ' 0,x% MIX BEV TAX 55,690 $7,644 1,954 315% HOTELIMOTEL TAX 350,000 364,000 14,000 4,0% 1 BINGO TAX 35,000 28,372 (6,628) -18,9% OTHER TAXES 440;440 450,016;', r.;q` SWIMMING POOL 34,000 33,041 (959) -2,8% CEMETERY FEES 9,000 40000 0 OA% { COMMUNITY BLDG RENT 27,100 24,210 (20890) -10.7% ! AIRPORT 48,084 50,000 1,916 4,0% REC PROD ACT FEES 17,500 14,451 (3,049) -17,4% ATHLETIC 23,500 16,775 (6,725) -28,6% AMD SRV FEES 4341335 200,000 (234,335) -54,0% WILLIAM SQ PARKING FEES 12,264 12,264 0 010% ' FIRE 1NSP, 20,950 15'm ENGINEER-CHARGE TO BP 419,500 350,000 (5,823) -27,9% (69,300) -lb,d% REVENUE FEES 0460!33 724,766 yam' (32t,36?), I ~I y ~tl AV ip`i1:1'fa. i5.1'lS{lftiy 1 GENERAL FUND R13VENUE DETAIL CURRENT YEAR BUDGET VERSUS Eo" TRAATE ESTIMATE OVER 1990191 1990/91 (UNDER) PERCENT REVENIJE DESCRIPTION BUDGET ESTIMATED BUDGET VARIANCE WARRANT FEES 115,000 45,000 (70,000) -60.9% ANIMAL POUND FEES 56,775 59,223 2,448 4,3% AUTO POUND FEES 32,500 32,656 156 0.5% MOWING FINES 11,300 13,000 1,700 15.0% POL ESCORT & GUARD FEES 18,000 15,722 (2,278) -12.7% COURT COST SRV PEES 28,000 15,400 (13,000) -46.4% ANIMAL CONTROL FINES 10,000 7,000 (3,000) -30.0% DENTON POLICE FINES 755,000 450,000 (305,000) -40.4% HEALTH DEPARTMENT PINES 0 0 0." 100.0% INSP FINES & FEES 1,500 450 (11050) -70,0% FIRE DEPT FINES 23,460 20,713 (2,747) -11.7% CIVIL FINES 0 800 800 100.0% ' UNT POLICE FINES 28,000 49,000 21,000 7510% TWU POLICE FINES 16,000 9,000 (7,000) -43.9% PARKINO FINES 69,000 44,000 (250000) -36.2% APPEARANCE BOND FORFEIT 11,000 7,000 (4,000) -36,496 COURT ADM FEES 54,000 75,000 21,000 38.9% ; ARREST FEES 48,000 $2,000 4,000 813% RESTAURANT INSP 16,010 191948 3,938 24,6% GROCERY INSP 6,580 7,600 1,020 I5.5% SWIM INSP 13,920 14,400 480 3.4% FOOD HAND INSP 45,000 42,735 (2,265) -5.0% DAY CARE INSP 30020 2,813 (207) -6.994 SEPTIC INSP -(moved)- 110 0 (110) -100,0% FALSE ALARM FEES 8,000 7,500 (500) -6,3% DRAINAOWSWEEPINO FEES 0 8,500 8,500 100.0% FINES & FEES 175: 77 999,060 (371,1tS) " -2y,)!i { 6 1hti,p: i GENERAY- FUND REVENUE DETA L f GURR YEAR BUDGET VERSUS 8S1IIv[ATE I ESTIMATE j OVER I 1990191 (UpWER) PERCENT 1990191 .w ESTIMATED BUDGET VARIANCE BUDGET REVENUE DESCRIPTION 27,000 7,000 35.0% ZONE PERMITS & PETITIONS 20'000 2,375 2,375 100,0% n 0 1407) -17,6% TAX CERTIFICATES 7,993 6,586 -5.3% WINE & BEER LICIPFR t9,000 18,000 (1'000) -26.7% ELEC & PLUMB LIC 30 OOO 22 000 (81000) VITAL STATS-BIRTH 79 040 64,802 (14,238) _17.796 543) BLDG PERMITS 340 11,797 900 (1(2,,225) -57.6% misc. PERMITS 1.4, 2,125 0 -0,0% I LOADING ZONES 17,500 17500 352 11.8% m R,O,W, INSP FEES 2,974 3,326 1.9% CURB CUT PERMITS l l 344 11,124 (220% 'i MOBILE HOME LIC 11,000 (41500) -20,0% 15,500 1,800 10010% VITAL STATS-DEATH 0 1,800 9,950) -39.4)6 SALE OF DOCUMENTS 25,000 15,150 ( 1060,0% j I)EVELOPM'ENT FEES 1,000 11,600 10'600 SIGN 224,964 {20,854) 245,St6 LICENSES AND PERMITS 58,3% 12,E 19,E 7'000 J PARKING METER REC 866 6,609 (5,257) -37.9%I~ ELEC INSP 13, 17,065 (452) -216% 17,517 1 -75.09E 00 500 ( ,500) PLMB INSP 2,0 8% OT INSP 42S,000 575,000 150,000 13.8% f INTEREST INCOME 19,570 16,000 (21570) -13.,570 55,5% TRATrpIC1POLICE REPORTS 54,870 85,350 30 , 480 36.4% MISC INCOME 275,000 375,000 100,000 STREET CUTS 23,720 133 0,6% CNTY CONTR-CIVIL. DEF 23,587 23,901 672 219% CIVIL DEF 23'229 11,540 10.4% FED CONTR- 111,164 122,704 -2.6% CNTY CONTR-LIB 279,734 272,460 {7,274) l,0% CNTY CONTR-AMB SRV 51,700 $2,196 496 i SM CITIES CONTR-AM13 6,541 1,689 (4,852) -74,2% P.U. ANIMAL CARCASSES 1,250 11600 350 28.0% , •ENO. FEES 1 278,?64 - ! 21.x96'1 ` MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES" 00 1,594, 794 .J 7 i , pN MXl, tprfYSla 1 GENERAL, FUND REVENUE DETAII. CURkENT YEAR BUDGET VERSUS ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ; OVER 1990191 1990/91 (UNDER) PERC$NT REVENUE DESCRIPTION BUDGET ESTIMATED BUDGET VARIANCE ADM TRANS-ELEC 1,661,364 1,661,364 0 0.0% ROI-ELEC 2,043,377 2,043,377 0 0.0% ADM TRANS-WTR 1,033,369 1,033,389 0 0,0% ROI-WTR 1,700,474 1,700,474 0 010% ADM SRVS-SAN 344,731 344,731 0 0.0% TRANS-DEF DRIVING 15,000 15,000 0 OA% TRANS-INS FUND 85,000 85,000 0 0.0% DEBT TRANS-SAN 202,267 202,267 0 0,0% TRANS-OTHER 200,000 200,000 0 0.0% TRANSFERS 7,285,1302 7$2l$ ,*W2 % ..y o s 1 III .t . 1 . O '(I t { GENERAL, FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY ORGANIZATION CURRENT YEAR BUDGET VERSUS ESTIMATE I ESTIMATE (OVER) DIV 1990-91 1990-91 UNDER PERCENT NUMBER DIVISION NAME BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET VARIANCE 0000 GENERAL GOVT 484,974 474;()76 10,892' 2.2% I~ 0013 CODE ENFORCEMENT 183,863 L84,370 (",07)0,394 0004 LEGAL 3831551 378,353 5,198 1.494 0005 MUNICIPAL JUDGE 104;735 105,382 (647) -0.696 1 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPT 0014 BUILDING INSPECTION 328,088 322,253 5,835 118% 0015 PLANNING ADM 408,998 399,317 9,681 2,4% 0016 MAINSTREET 4 4 a i,4_79 Q DEPT TOTAL 741;565 • 776,049 15,SIb' 2,4 FINANCE DEPT 0020 FINANCE ADM 238,399 236,315 2,084 0.9% 0021 PURCHASING 206,639 207,682 {1,0431 -01591 0022 CUSTOMER SERVICE 947,552 815,637 131,915 13,9% I: 0023 TREASURY 235,399 221,987 13,412 517% 0024 ACCOUNTING 451,946 450,400 11546 0,3% 0025 TAX 64,614 67,965 (30151) -4,9% 0026 MUNICIPAL COURT 27732 237,159 7 DEPTTOTAL 2,3801481 '2,237,14# 14"'j6: INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT k~b 0080 ADMINISTRATION 865,454 844,760 20,294 2,3% 0081 WORD PROCESSING 209.989 f l .080) DEPT TOTAL 1073 443 l 0009 MUNI SERVIECON DEV 146,540. 166,0 , . p .094: 0003 QUEST X144: 34,3,77: (2335< -0,7'ki 0008 PERSONNEL 1 482,994 471011' 11,352 259! ~j PARKS AND RECREATION DEFT ' 0060 PARKS ADMW 234,084 231,394 2,690 11190 i~ 0062 LEISURE SERVICES 9910379 991,379 0 0,0% 0063 PARK MAINTENANCE 067,533 11066,909 624 01194 1,,a 0002 ButummaGPERATIC,4s 934,633 936,097 (1.4641 AIM DEPT TOTAL 320629 9 hlLrf_ Yb. GENERAL- FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY ORGANIZATION CURRENT YEAR BUDGET VERSUS Egr[MATE ES'ITMATE (O'V'ER) 1990-91 UNDER PERCENT DIV 1990 91 ES MATE HUDOET VARI &cNCE_ NUMBER DIVISION NAME BUDGET ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPT 134,483 3,503 2,5% 0039 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 137,986 086 245_234 1 1 0039 ANIMALCONTROL 37?s/33 21336 362 0601 ? DEPT TOTAL y LIBRARY DEPT 200,187 158 0.1% 0070 LIBRARY ADM 200306,,345 306,140 310,052 (3,912) -1.3% 0072 SUPPORT SERVICES 322,152 323,572 (1,420) `0.496 0073 ADULT SERVICES 0.4% q90 7 9 0074 YOUTH SERVICES {,004;617; t,009,070 46.1 ' I DEPT TOTAL ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION DEPT 911,125 75,625 7.7% OOlO EkoINEBR[Na 966,750 381,592 2,166 0,691 001-2 TRANSPORTATION ENO 363,780 949 (10,012) -1.2% STREET PATCHING 650,937 660, 35,310 4,996 0031 0033 STREET CONSTRUCTION 714,360 679,050 4 0 ^040 373 0034 STREET LIGHTING 373,Q44 3,301,87 3;05,716 1`03~1f f DEPT TOTAL 2 31l :.3 a9~_ OOt9 AIRPORT 79,553 77,f72',` . FIRE DEPT 541,964 9,876. 0050 FIRE ADM 5$1,842 -4.3% 0051 FIRE OPERATIONS 3,281,956 3,422,104' (140,151) 13:6% 203,089 175,457 27,632 0052 PREVENTION 892,574 149485 l,6% 907 68.080 0053 EMER MED SERVICE3 +059 0054 EMER MANAOEMENT? DEPT TOTAL 5,016,013 3,100;;82', (wi6~) 41`,7 d,27a ~a,~9c 0040 POLICE (ALL) $ ,7bb,562 08t0 DRAINAGE/sWRBPING 4/37,'IQ6 44,01,`: MISCELLANEOUS (NON-DEPT) 1b1,600 0 0.0% 015M PLAN MISC 161,600 6,7% $00 020M FINANCE ADM MiSC 709,314 647,614 61, 12 556 197,004 : 024M ACCOUNTING MISC ~+r!. 144% TOTAL 2,13,9`lb 1,935,474 TOTAL S 6w ~c OSNERAL Fu" 10 Now i ENGINEERING/TRANSPORTATION/STREET ACTUAL EXPENDITURES (PERCENT OF 'T'OTAL GENERAL FUND) FISCAL YEAR 1986 198'7 i .y i 1 1 I' 1988 , 1989 1990 ~ j 1991 (EST,) I 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% I1 POLICE DEPARTMENT ACTUAL EXPENDITURES 4 (PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL GENERAL FUND) I 20% 16% 10% 6% 0%- 1987 _ 1988 1989 1990 1991 % ® 19,17% 19,37% W.04 % 20.12% 21,38% FISCAL YEAR 'EST.' l a FIR DEPARTMENT NTAGE ACTUAL OF TOTALGENERALIDFUN EXPENDITURES (PERCENTAGE 20% 16% 10% 5% 0% _ 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 J' tA.01% 16,64% 16.36%~ 18,8% 16,85 % FISCAL YEAR 12 1 _ Owl r i i,4 RECREATION FUND CURRENT VERSUS BUDGET ESTIMATE ESTIMATE i OVER { 1990-91 199041 (UNDER) PERCENT f~ REVENUE BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET VARIANCE SPECIAL PROJECTS 28,000 16,964 (11,036) -39.4% ATHLETIC/SPORTS, 53,000 21,662 (31,338) -59.1% MARKETING 34,441 19,776 (14,665) -42.6% CIVIC CENTER 19,414 18,716 (698) -3.6% DENIA RECREATION CENTER 33,905 16,253 (17,652) -52.1% NORTH LAKES REC. CENTER 68,157 36,616 (31,541) -46.3% I SENIOR. CENTER 90,259 23,474 (66,785) -74.0% j CHILDREN'S PROGRAM 182,412 147,256 (35,156) -19.3% ' GOLDFIELD TENNIS CENTER 55,360 43,259 (12,101) -21.9% ' AQUATICS 53,472 42,056 (11,414) -21,3% GOLF 43,000 30,823 (12,177) -28.3% ' THERAPEUTICS 110750 7,500 MLK RECREATION CENTER 9,500 6,140 (4,250) -36,2% (1,400) -14,7% TOTAL REVENUE 682,670 432,457 (2$0,213) -3617% 1 ESTIMATE i (OVER) 1990-91 1990-91 UNDER PERCENT EXPENDITURES - - BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET VARIANCE j ,F PERSONAL SERVICES 349,019 241,845 107,174 3017% ` SUPPLIES 111,759 62,505 49,254 44.1% MAINTENANCE 1,520 717 803 52.8% SERVICES 155,711 87,407 68,304 43.9% tA~ SUNDRY 0 0 0 10010% ' FIXED ASSETS 0 0 0 100.096 ,a TOTAL EXPENDITURES 618,009 392,474 225,535 3615% .Nki ?H.kteu. yt.;, 83°d s r-: t .~yf 1 13 I 4 t E RNTERPRISE/WO; *'T" ^APIT~►I. FUND ANAL ELECTRIC FUND WATER/WASTEWATER FUND SANITATION FUND t WORKING CAPITAL FUND i f w~ I ll j a~ I x r 15 r, klS'Meapa +1 9 d ELECTRIC FUND SUMMARY CURRENT NTAR BUDGET VERSUS ESTRAATB ESTIMATE 4l OVER ! 1990-91 1990-91 (UNDER) PERCENT REVENUES BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET VARIANCE ( SALE OF SCRAP MATERIAL 4,000 0 (4,000) -100.0% E INTEREST OPERATING 878,000 11263,000 385,000 43,8% MISCELLANEOUS 31,000 62,000 31,000 100,0% ELECTRIC SALES RESIDENTIA 20,897,000 19,917,000 (960,000) -4,7% 7 l ELECTRIC SALES COMMERCIA 30,697,000 30,750,000 53,000 012% i l INTRA-GOVERNMENTAL ELE 21759,000 2,930,000 171,000 612% DAWN-TO-DUSK RENTAL FEE 143,000 190,000 47,000 32,9% ! RESALE POWER INCOME 1,824,000 1,607,000 (217,000) -11.9% ! CUSTOMER CONNECTION FEE 205,000 165,000 (40,000) -19,5% STREET AND HIGHWAY LIGHT 352,000 405,000 53,000 15.1% SERVICE CENTER RENT 224,000 224,000 0 0,0% UTIL CAP CHARGE - BRAZOS 947,000 112130000 266,000 23.1% TMPA COVERAGE RETURN 5,753,000 6,117,580 364,560 6,3% RECONNECTION F8ES 31,000 90,000 590000 190.3% i=rl TEMPORARY ELECTRIC FEES 66,000 I004000 34,000 51.5% AID IN CONSTRUCTION 47,000 81,000 34,000 72,3% METER TAMPERING 12,000 6,000 (6,000) 50,0% f..d OTHER ELECTRIC CHARGES 49,000 44,000 (5,000) -10,211 I TOTAL REVENUES 64,919,000 65,164,580 ! 245,580 0391 di 1 i 1 i ~n3 1 1 11 I i 1 17 r 1`51,.1iL t } BLECI'[tIC FUND SUMMARY CURRFbn' VF? AR BUDGET VERSUS ESTIMATE ESTIMATE (OVER) 1990-91 1990 91 UNDER PERCENT BUDGET ESTIMATE HUDOBI VAR CH EXPENDITURES 125,586 13,9% ADMINISTRATION 905,586, 780,000 2,436,650 5A% 48,360,650 45,924,0:0 x,092 13.5% PRODUCTION 3,757,092 3,+00 DISTRIBUTION 819,038 819,000 38 0,0% r' METERING 60,674 13,2% COMMUNICATIONS 460,674 ~,0 12,353 L7% 742,353 730+~ ' 16.8 % SUBSTATIONS 480,763 400,000 8083,,763 27.4% ENGINEERING 763 ENERGY MANAGEMENT 303,051 220,000 220,460 1950000 25,460 11.5% ; STREET LIOHTINO 37,700 25,000 12,700 33.1% HYDRO ELECTRIC 97,097 97,000 97 0.1 % SPECIAL PROJECTS 2,043,377 2,043,000 377 0.0% RETURN ON INVEST TRANSFER 3,311,000 3,911+000 0 0.0% , DEBT SERVICE 11662,957 0 010% ` GENERAL SW ADMIN TRANSFER 1,66212,95,257 7 12,252 01 0,0% SANITATION FUND ADMIN TRANS 300 000 190,000 38,8% ~ BAD DHBT NSE 490,(100 E_ 100,000 25,0% 400,000 300,000 ; ' ' ECA REDUCTION 125,000 125,000 0 0.0% INCREASE IN WC " 77 3,634,341 5.6% i.. EXPENDITURES 64,829,050 61,194,209 TOTAL 'Ego &Am, A i I : r 18 µA. v 4 tl S na.r.r IV! , 4 j MEMORANDUM TO: Betty McKean - Executive Director - MSED FROM: Tom Klinck - Director of Personnel and Employee Relations I SUBJECT: Response to City Council on 1991/92 Proposed Budget DATE: August 16, 1991 Betty, this memo is to respond to the city council's request forforithenformation about increases in # ! Personnel and Employee Relations Department. ~ Supplies Acco nts The Supplies accounts in the personnel/Employee Relations Department funds i ` the following line items - office supplies, books and magazines, postage, film, the employee newsletter, and computer paper, 866. The 1990/91 overall The approved 1989/90 Budget for Supplies was $26 , Supplies budget approved was $36,971, The approximate $9,100 increase in badwere budgeted amounts for 90isto d below/90wethat anticipatedethosehincreases and members last st year are provided justification for the increased needs. That portion of the 1990191 overall Supplies budget for the office supplies account (08101), we requested and were approved for an increase of $8,852 for: # y 1. working through the recommended decisions of the Mercer Study, requiring briefings for City Council, in-depth discussions for Executive Directors, and training for Directors, 180 managers/supervisors, and 660 employees; (this necessitated different and n understanding); and handouts to ensure effective communication 2. having changed the Health Insurance Program to Sanus/Nof empLifeetheThus, previous year, there was much confusion we provided monthly updates to 860 employees on how to access medical providers, ways to reduce costs, what changes were occurring in medical providers, etc.; 3, the Health Insurance Study and Evaluation, currently in progress, required the development and reproduction of 12 "thick" bid packets to prospective new health insurance carriers; 4. as authorized by City Council, we implemented the new Drug Screening # Policy requiring training for 180 managers and supervisors (again, this j requlrr.1 training materials and information on pro edures to handle i # situations with employees; it, further, required the needed materials for them to adequately explain this change to employees); i .n qtr ~ ita f::r:fs: r, jAA~~a k~ ['rr e. rr i rl ff 3 August 16, 1991 t Memo to B. McKean - Response to City Council on 1991192 Proposed Budget Page 2 1 5, As a part of our commitment to Affirmative Action, as authorized by City Council, we made an intensive effort for Police and Fire entry exams; this required the copying of approximately 400 recruitment packets to prospective applicants, as well as conducting special orientation f sessions; and 6, obviously, the Personnel function is highly "paper" intensive because of I our involvement in ensuring effective communication with all employees; E as such, normal inflationary increases for general office supplies affect our operational costs more We requested and received $136 additional funding in our boots and magazine account (#8102) for publications and information related to the new Americans With Disabilities Act in order to prepare ourselves and managers/supervisors on this upcoming implementation. We requested and were authorized by Council for $118 additioral funding in the postage account (08109) to cover mailings of the 400 Police and Fire entry exam recruitment packets. With the proposed 1991/92 Budget, the overall Supplies budget is recommended at $39,177. This represents a proposed overall increase of 53,208. The increased funding is needed to continue the implementation activities with Mercer. We have estimated that the costs for processing employee payroll documents to complete all changes to the Employee Informatior System (EIS - computer mainframe) at $1,609, With the Health Insurance St,dy currently being finalized, we are anticipating a change to that program that will be more cost effective and with improved services. This will reoulre a significant communication effort during open enrollment in order to effectively inform employees of new coverages, medical providers, premium rates, etc. Thus, an additional $1,306 is included in our proposed office supplies account. Further, to ensure we conduct effective follow-up communication for employees on these important organizational changes, we are expecting a increase to produce the Employee Newsletter once a month. The Employee Newsletter is a vital communication link and contains important information to keep employees updated on various city-wide events/activities (including Health Insurance, Mercer activities, etc,) and a message from the City Manager, The proposed increase for this is $1,900, S tic u t,~ The Services accounts in The Personnel/Employee Relations Deaartment funds the following line items - telephones, special services (employee physicals and Civil Service Exams), travel, advertising, dues a publications, hire of 1 equipment (Xerox copier payments), prison meats (Service Awards Program), manpower services, employee training, and the tuition reimbursement program, The overact 1989/90 Budget for Services accounts were approved by City Council at $57,938, 1 August 16, 1991 Memo to B. McKean - Response to City Council on 1991/92 Proposed Budget Page 3 Again, last year, we discussed with the City Council the Justification for ' the 1990/91 Services budget. This was approved at $66,965. The approved increase was $9,027 and were necessary to cover: 1, in the special services account (#8502) - $6,462, for an anticipated 25 z additional employee medical physicals and for funding of Police and Fire entry and promotional exams for the Police and Fire Departments due to retirements and turnover; - 1 Entry Police Exams - $ 1,600 - 1 Entry Fire Exam - $ 2,100 - 3 Promotional Exams 0olice and Fire) - $3,300 2. because of turnover in professional staff in the Personnel Department, an virtually every new individual in a position has come to the position with little formal training in the human resource management field (Selection and Placement, Compensation/Classificat)on, Benefits and Insurance, Training and Development, etc.), Knowledge of specific laws (EEO/Affirmative Action, Fair Labor Standards Act, State Civil Service Law, immigration Reform and Control Act, Age Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, etc.) and the practical handling of the employment process is critically important for us to operate the City properly and legally. Thus, the Council authorized an additional $2,812 In the travel and schools and seminars accounts 08503 and 08522) to provide training and development for the new staff members in their respective professional areas; 3. the meals account (#8511 - identified in the budget as prison meals) was increased an additional $1,397 because of an increase of 51 more participants and recipients at Annual Service Awards Program banquet, The 1991/92 Proposed Budget for Services expenditures is recommended at $67,392, or a $427 increase over the 90/91 Budget approved by the City Council. Although the overall increase is $427, the tuition reimbursement account (08632) is proposed at $8,000. This is $4,000 above previous year's funding because, In the last 3 years, participation has continued to increase. In 1989/90, we had a total of 34 employees receive reimbursement ! for completing courses toward degrees at the local universities, We are anticipating that to double participation in 1991/92. In addition, college tuition costs have been raising steadily over this time and the recent. budget approved by the State legislature increases these fees further. This program assists our employees in improving their knowledge in specific fields of study that benefit the City. over the near-term, we benefit by improved ability in an employae's current ,job. Over the long-term, the City ; Is preparing employees to improve their candidacy for promotion, and we are preparing our future leaders for the organization. E i d August 16, 1991 Memo to B. McKean -Response to City Council on i99i/92 proposed Budget Page 4 if you need other information or a clarification on this. please let me know Thank You, Thomas W, Klinck F, Director, Personnel/Employee Relations l F j I i bmmi08c.prn 8/18/91 2;46p } 4 Jj 1 wry of DENTON, TffX48 MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MrK1NNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 M E M O R A v D O hf TO: Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation FROM: Alicia A. Menteli, Superintendent of Leisure Services DATE: August 20, 1992 SUBJECT: Fee Comparison Survey I Attached is a copy of a Fee Comparison Survey that includes Denton and six other cities in the Metroplex. The programs listed cover different classes, trips, special activities/events, special interest, park amenities and t h assessments. This listing is not all inclusive of every program offered by any of the cities, it does reflect some of the core program areas offered and common to most of the cities surveyed. ! i In some instances the requested information is not readily available from the cities surveyed and is Identified as such on the survey chart. Staff continues to seek this information and expects to have it in the near future. C:e42 CL / YPi~ Alicia A. Mentel! Attachment RECR2177 I l t 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 4342529 August 20, 1491 FEE CONPARISGN STUDY PROGRAMS DENTON ARLINGTON CARROLLTON IRYING LE41I5YILLE PLANO RICNARG50K CLASSES: g X91 Aerobics 4 X30 X12 $2 0 j3.79 Fee - 3 Days $17 $2 $1.26 2.25 l Unit Price {1.42 $2'40 Aquatics 6 g $27 6 X10 2 80 Fee; Beg: Swim 32 $27 6 Classes >j3.78 Boo $3.38 ~ . unit Price Arts Fee - Ceramics X1. None $ 237 $14670 $ ,60 $2 Unit Price X1.33 i Day camps ;115 None ;40 Nona ¢9026 X1948 Fees nit Price $17 .24 1.05 450 U 30 $10 0 $6 s Gyr.nastics Fees $18 $28 ;1.87 $1.26 $2.16 >l2.60 $6 Unit price $1.60 X3.60 ;72 Pre-school O81 N!A 11/A76 $2,77 Fees Unit Price .67 580 $2.12 Tennis 1 $28 V 6 ' Feet Adult Lessons $46 $38 8 1 }28 $32 dbls 6! # 41x 6 Fees Youth Lessons $36 6 None / Fee: Leagues X21 sngis 7 Mcs ;S/l.75 ;4.60 adult/ $6 Unit Price $4.20/p.50 $40 i/450/2.17 P16 $7 child $3.60 O Theepeutic Recreation $70 $10 w/t-Shirt None None X525 Fees: Camps $772 80 X1.17 360 Unit Price i unit price equals one program hour. ..bf}kVtkfini*4+uPa us.sx I Pago - 2 r PROGRAMS DENTON ARLINGTON CARROLLTON IRVING LEWISVILLE PLANO RICHARDSON TRIPS Outdoor Nature i Foe: Backpack trip ! (weekend) $64 None $30 w/shirt None None $80 None Unit Price $1:78 $1,83 $5 i ( Senior Adults } Fee: Trips (metroplex) $12,60 $20/10nch $12 $10 None $3 per trip $10 j Unit Price $1,66 $4 $2 $1:26 ;1,25 1! SPECIAL ACTIVITIES/ EVCNTS 4th of July j Fee None 0 Free Free-Parade Free None tae ( Teens Fee - Dances $4.00 None None None None None None Unit Price $1.33 SPECIAL INTEREST Aquatics Fees Adult Adm: $1.00 $2.50 $1,26 $1/18 d over $1 $1/indoor $1 $1.25/autdnor Fee: Child AM, $1,00 $2 Free under $1.26 under 600 age 6 17 $1 Free under 7 $1 3 yes 5 free Athletics Feet Co-Rec League $300 $340 $285 $250 $165 $285 Pal), $275 Unit Price $300 Spring $37,60 $34 $28.60 N/A $23,57 per team N/A $23 Unit price equals one program hour, 1 YfJ'J3L41t~ f Page - 3 PROGRAMS DENTON ARLINGTON CARROLLTON IRVING LENISVILLE PLANO RICHARDSON SPECIAL INTERESI't Golf Driving Range Privately Owned Privatized Privately owned None 1 pays S conc. Fee for a bucket of balls ;2 ;1.60 t N of balls in { buckets 35-40 balls 35-40 Small ;4 25-30 ;3,25 for 60 arge ;3 60-55 ;5,40/100 Tennis Feat court , Reservation $1.60 ;2/person/hour ;2/court/1.6 hrs No charga ;1/6-10130, 1/2 hr; ;2 ;1.60 for 750 before 6pm adults, ;1.60 112 hour i youth y ! AMENITIES Park Amenities Feet Picnic Areas 0 ;26 Free None ;26/day, no dap, free None Bai l Nel ds ;6 N/A League play only None No ;26 120 Garden Area 0 ;26 None No Free None Amphitheatre ;5 ;26 ;20/hour None ;60/day, no None None tables/chairs - Pavilions 0 ;,lo M-Th, ;40 Free None small 76 people Free None F.SU ;25/day, Large j 260 people, ;260 t per day f r Pago 4 PROGRAMS DENTON ARLINGTON CARROLLTON IRVING LENISVILLE PLANO RICHARDSON ASSESSMENTS Facility Use Residen~ 0 Adult-$7, No No Ind-$100 Fam-$35, 0 (good for No { Youth+, Fam+ Seniors 50% disc, 2 years) Adult-;24, Ind-~15, Faro-$50 Yth-412, Fam-#40 Administrative Fee Resident P45 No No No N/A No Non-Resident $7-$1h Public Relations Fee X31 No No No N/A No j I fi b , WATBR & WASTEWA113R FUND SUMMARY 4 CtM WNT YEAR. BUDOET'VERSI)S ES'T'IMATE ESTIMATE OVER 1990-91 1990-91 (UNDER) PERCENT BUDOBT ESTIMATE BUDGET VARIANCE REVENUES - I INTEREST 12'000 2,000 (10,000) -83.3% r.i 704,000 0 (704,000) _1004% MISCELLANEOUS 5,573,000 4,900,000 (673,000) -12.1% WATER RESIDENTIAL 5,079,000 5,158,000 79,000 1.696 WATER COMMERCIAL 225 ~0 (35,000) -13x5% j " WATER GOVERNMENTAL 260,000 189,000 29,596 641,000 830,000 WATER FOR RESALE 2,248,000 2,3071000 59,000 2,6% SEWER RESIDENTIAL 4,584,OW 2,480,000 (11604,000) -35.0% ~ SEWER COMMERCIAL 91 ~ 78,000 {13,000) -14r3% SEWER INTRAOOVERNMENTAL 264,490 3121000 48,000 118.% SEWER INTERGOVERNMENTAL 56,000 99,000 43,000 6x8% SEWER INDUSTRIAL WASTE FEES 76,000 80,000. 4,000. 5.3% WATER TAPPING PEES 600 (14,400) 9610% PRO RATA WATER/W CHARCIB5 15,000 100496 WATER AID IN CONSTRUCTION 160,000 0 (180,000) ~ ~ 6,000 (19,000) -76.0% SEWER TAPPING FEES 0 (9,000)100.0% SEWER 13XTBNSIONS stooo 36 ~ 0 (36,000) 100,0% SEWER Alp IN CONSTRUCTION 11 16,000 5,000 45,5% COLIPGRM'ANALYSIS (85,~pp) 99.4% OTHER WATER & SEWER C14AROES 86,000 19,9460000 160994,100 (2,951,900) 14,6% ..i TOTAL REVENUES Wwac.."v I i 1 ~ I, a t9 ` y WATER & WASTEWATER FUND SUMMARY CURRENT YEAR BUDGET VERSUS ESTIMATE ESTIMATE (OVER) 1990-91 1990-91 UNDER PERCENT EXPENDITURES BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET VARIANCE WATER ADMINISTRATION 251,774 248,000 3,774 113% WATER PRODUCTION 4,648,210 41325,840 322,370 619% WATER DISTRIBUTION 2,286,267 21210,088 76,179 13% WATER METERING 553,336 503,000 $0,336 911% WATER ENGINEERING 119,370 110,000 91370 7.8% WATER LAB 134,084 125,000 9,084 618% WASTFWATERADMINNTRATION 253,354 2251300 211,054 ll,l% WASTEWATER TREATMENT 1,999,454 1,836,500 162;954 8.1% WASTEWATER COLLECTION 1,250,734 11130,000 120,734 .9,7% WASTEWATER ENGINEERING 371,873 360,000 111873 3,296 WASTEWATER LAB 389,401 350,000 39,40; 1011% ' j WATER ADMIN TRANS - OEN FUND 633,183 633,183 0 0.0% WATER ROI TRANS - GEN FUND 816,333 816,333 0 01096 WATER ADMIN TRANS - SAN FUND 111043 11,043 0 010% WATER DEBT SERVICE 2,854,530 2,854,530 0 01096 WATER BAD DEBT EXP 69,600 25,000 44,600 64.196 WATER MISCELLANEOUS 87,000 7,000 801000 92,0% WW ADMIN TRANS - GEN FUND 404,822 404,822 0 010% WW Rol TRANS - GEN FUND 884,141 884,141 0 010% r" WW ADMIN'TRANS - SAN FUND 71060 7,060 0 010% WW DBBT,SERVICE 1,282,470 11282,470 0 0.096 WW BAD DEBT EXP 46,400 35,000 11,400 24,696 WW MISCELLANEOUS 146,000 0 1460000 100,0% 1 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 19,500,439 1813 84,310 1,116,125 5.7% 5i.fASxrto#,`k rw.t.3 AR✓e,<,,,s. ,i iiL sEks FMK ) (f sf,"I~{.T7iit A"~ n . >YnFt . i i f~l~~vrim 4mn `~1][~ERCS~ 4 t 20 s i s i SANTfATION FUND SUMMARY 3 CURRENT YEAR VERSUS ESTIMATE ESTIMATE OVER 1990-91 1990-91 (UNT,ER) PERCENT BUDGET E5[MATE BUDGET VARIANCE J RBVE_. NI1$Sr-_-- _ ~ GARBAGE FEES-RESIDENTIAL 1,707'855 11704,625 (31230) -0.2% 1 "`1 j j GARBAGE PEES-COMMERCIAL 1,362,819 1,447,755 84,936 61255 j SPECIAL PICKUP SERVICE 67,188 5,277 (61,911) -92.155 LANDFILL PERMITSICONTRACTS 201,634 245,660 44,026 21.8% SALE OF REFUSE BAGS 42,838 40,782 (2,056) -41% 200,000 0 (200,000) -10010% LANDFILL RETIREMENT 0 0.0% A ADMIN TRANSFER - GEN FUND 30,000 30'000 0 010% j j ADMIN TRANSFER - WC FUND 24,860 24,860 j AbMiN TRANSFER - ELECTRIC 13,845 12,252 (1,593) r' ADMIN TRANSFER - WATERIWW 22,719 18,103 (41616) -20.3% 0 949 949 100.0 % MISCELLANEOUS INCOME ,09CIALPROIECTSILTCBNSEFEES 148,326 72,151 (76,175) 514% TOTAL I+I:VENUES 3 822`-Ot4 3 602,414 (219,670) 5.1% ESTIMATE i (OVER) 1990 91 1990-91 UNDER PgRCIINT 1 EXPEND BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET VARIANCE COMMUNITY SBRVICES-ADMIN 165,514 1650299 215 011% i .f RESIDENTIAL COLLECTION 1,347,993 1,294,228 53,765 4.0% COMMERCIAL COLLECTION 823,182 796,751 251431 3.4% I' SANITATION DISPOSAL 657,481 766,997 (109,516) 16.7% h. CIEN. FUND ADMIN TRANSFER 344,731 344,731 0 0.0% 0.696 DEBT SERVICE 202,267 202,267 0 BAD DEBT EXPENSE 181920 130201 51719 3012% DEBT RETIREMENT SINK1140 FUND 200,000 18,940 1111060 9015% TOTAL gXPENWIMES 3,762,085 3,602 414 159,474 M j 1 21 y 1 tI WORK'WG (7APITAL FUND SUMMARY CURRENT YPIAR BUDGET VERSUS T'sTEwATE ESTIMATE OVER 1990 9t REVENUE 1990-91 (UNDER) PERCENT BUIXIET ESTIMATE , "'ME V_ OAS & DIESEL SALES 430,000 502,000 72,000 16,7% GARAGE SALES 567,Q10 490,000 GARAGE LABOR 326,000 306 OW (77,000) -13,6% . ~ , (20,040) -6.1% SUBLET REPAIR 400,000 410,000 10,f00 2,5% MACHINE SHOP LABOR 135,000 110,000 MACHINE SHOP PARTS 49,000 41,806 ( (18,000) °18,5% SALE OF SCRAP 28,000 24,OOU (x040) -16,3 % WAREHOUSE SALEc (4,000 2,150,000 1,905,000 (243,00,;)... -11.4% WAREHOUSE SERVIc,E CHARLIE 400,000 SALES TO OUTSIDE AGENCIES 228,600 (17.1,4(10) .42,9% 0 15,400 15,000 I00k096 ' TOTAL REVENUES ~4,49 0 - 4,0'31,600 (453,400) -1011% ESTIMATE (OVER) 1990-91 I990-9.1 UNDER PERCENT EXPENFIITIJRE3 BUDOET ESTIMATE BUDOFIT VARUNC9 EQUIPMENT SERVICES MACHINE SHOP [,747,229 1,7050000 42,229 180,404 152,000 24tox 1517% WAREHOUSE 2,236,612 2,090,522 146,150 6.596 DEBT SERVICE 50,000 $0 1 ADM1N TRANS - SAN FUND 0 U.0% 24,860 24460 0 0,0% TOTAL EXPE,NDFTIIRES may` 4,239,165 4,0220392 2'16,713 r; s n i :s,': ~3,~:4',~.F:s: x ~ ~~.<,'s',' /el r;:t:. r"~" S a f..#?S-' a `f i j 22 f t t{ - kfl~tJjf! C s CITY of DENTON, TKXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 115 E. MaKINNEY ~ DENTON, TEXAS 16101 M E M O R A N D U M 1 TO; Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation FROM! Alicia A. Mentell, Superintendent of Leisure Services DATE: August 20, 1991 SUBJECT; Fee Comparison Survey Attached is a copy of a Fee Comparison Survey that includes Denton and six other cities in the Metroplex. The programs listed cover different classes, trips, special activities/events, special interest, park amenities and 1 assessments. This listing is not all inclusive of every program offered by any of the cities, it does reflect some of the tore program areas offered and common to t most of the cities surveyed# fn some instances the requested information is not readily available from the cities surveyed and it identified as such on the 'survey chart. Staff continues to seek this information and expects to have It in the near future, ,ilinla A. Mentell~ Attachment I RECR2177 I i i i 8171566.8200 D/PW METRO 4342514 l August 20, 1991 FEE COMPARISON STUDY PROGRAMS PENTNI ARLINGTON CARROLLTON IRVING LENISVILLE PLA140 RICHARDSON CLASSES. Aerobics Fee - 3 Days 417 424 430 2 X2.26 ;28 43.79 Unit Price ;1,42 42.40 ;1.26 Aquatics Feet Beg., Swim Classes X32 427 445 410 ;25 ;28 427 Unit Moo }4 ;3.78 800 43.38 42,80 46 Arts Fae » Ceramics ;16 None 422 4B ;14,50 ;22 44 Unit Pri<:e 41.33 ;1.37 41 41.67 45,50 42 Day Camps Fees 487 4115 Nona ;40 None ;90 479 Unit Price 41.24 ;1.05 46! ;1.25 41.98 1 Gymnastics Fees ;18 428 ;30 410 ;170 Ik Unit Price 41.60 $3.60 ;1.87 41.26 ;2.16 $2.60 p I Pre-School Fees ;50 428 ;51/68 N/A N/A 430 472 Unit Price ;1.67 68! x.12 43.76 42.77 Tennis Fees Adult Lessons 446 438 440 ;1 428 436 436 I Fees Youth Lessons ;36 436 448 ;1 428 ;36 436 Feel Leagues 421 426 None 422/dbls, 426/ Sngls 476 sngis 7 wks Unit Price 44:20/44,60 4406/4:50/2.17 4516 44,60 adult/ ;8/46/43;76 ;3.60 47 child Therpeutic Recreation Fees: Camps ;72 470 410 w/t-shirt None None ;45 ;HO Unit, Price 41,80 41.17 360 42.26 42 Unit price equals one program hour. {tP&R~R4.rdW 1SF1~~~'7dtflill.lA1!"L IRVFKN.,.....w~r....... ....ter.. r.e a.. . ON 1 r Page - 2 PROGRAMS DENTON ARLINGTON CARROLLTON IRVING LENISVILLE PLANO RICHARDSON TRIPS Outdoor Nature Fee; Backpack trip (weekend) $64 None #30 w/shirt None None f80 None Unit Price N1;78 $1,83 $5 f Senior Adults Feet Trips lmetropiex) 112,60 $201lunch $12 11D Nane $3 per trip flo Unit Price 11,66 $4 $2 $1;25 $1,26 SPECIAL ACTIVITIES/ EVENTS 4th of July Fee Now 0 Free Free-Parade Free None Free ; i Teens Fee • Dances 0.00 None None None None Hone None Unit Price $1,33 SPECIAL INTEREST 1.' Aqua ti cs Feet Adult Adm; $1,00 12.60 $1.26 11/18 & over $1 fl/indoor 11 $1;26/outdoor Feet Child Adm. }1.00 $2 Free under, $1.25 under 500 age 6-17 $1 Free under 7 $1 3 yrs '6 free Athletics Feet Co-Rec League $300 $340 $285 $260 1165 $28S Fall, $275 Unit Price 01,50 $300 Spring $34 $28,50 N/A 123.67 per team N/A f23 $ Unit price equals one program hour. i 4 " - 3 P ago PROGRAMS DENTON ARLINGTON CARROLLTON IRVING LEWISVILLE PLANO RICHARDSON SPECIAL INTEREsTi Golf Driving Range Privately Owned Privatized Privately owned None pays d conc. Fee for a bucket of bal l s f2 $1,60 M of balls in buckets 35-40 balls 35-40 Snail f4 26.30 13,25 for 60 Large $3 60-56 0,40/100 Tennis Fee: Court Reservation $1.60 f2/person/hour f2/court/I.6 hrs No charge fl/6-1000, 112 hrl $2 $1.60 for 760 before 6pm adults, (1.60 1/2 hour youth AMENITIES 1. Park Amenities Feel Picnic Areas 0 $25 Free None $26/day, no dep. Free Nano Ballfields $5 N/A League play only None No $26 $20 Darden Area 0 $26 None No Free None I Amphitheatre $5 $26 $20/hour None f50/day, no None Nore tablos/chairs Pavilions 0 f30 M-Th, $40 Free None Small 26 people Free None F-Su $26/day, Largo 260 people, $260 per day } v 4 ;v t i PAye - 4 I T PROGRAMS DENTON ARLINGTON CARROLLTON IRVING LENISVILLE PLANO RICHARDSON ASSESSMENTS Facility use I (ood for No Resident 0 Adult+, No No Ind-#10, Fam-#35, #5 9 Youth-#5, Fam-#I Senlors 50% disc. 2 years) Adult-#24, ind-~15, Fam-#50 Ylii-#i2, Fam-#40 Administrative Fee No #1 N/A No Resident #2-#5 No No Non-Resident #1-#15 Public Relations N/A No Fee #3 #1 No No NO i ,I f i 1 i I t MEMORANDUM r TO: Betty McKean - Executive Director - MSEO 1 FROM; Tom Klinck Director of Personnel and Employee Relations i v Z SUBJECT; Response to City Council on 1991/92 Proposed Budget y DATE: August 16, 1991 1 Betty, this memo is to respond to the City Council's request for information about increases in the proposed Supplies and Services Budgets for the Personnol and Employee Relations Department, supplies cou ty The Supplies. accounts in the Personnel /Employee Relations Department funds the following line items - office supplies, books and magazines, postage, newsletter, nd om paper, film, the employee and computer uter e emtoYee p The approved 1989/90 Budget for Supplies was $26,866, The 1990/91 overall Supplies budget approved was $36,971. The approximate $0,100 increase In i budgeted amounts for 90/91 over 89/90 that were discussed with Council members last year are listed below, we had anticipated those increases and provided justification for the increased needs. That portion of the 1990/91 overall Supplies budget for the office 9upplles account (08101), we requested and were approved for an increase of $8,862 for: 1. working through the recommended decisions of the Mercer Study, requiring briefings for City Council, in-depth discussions for Executive Directors, 1 and training for Directors, 180 managers/supervisors, and 660 employees; (this necessitated several different training materials and handouts to ensure effective communication and understanding); 2. having changed the Health Insurance Program to Sanus/N,Y. Life the previous year, there was much confusion on the part of employees, Thus, we provided monthly updates to 860 employees on how to access medical providers, ways to reduce costs, what changes were occurring in medical providers, etc.; 31 the Health Insurance Study and Evaluation, currently in progress, required the development and reproduction of 12 "thick" bid packets to prospective new health insurance carriers; 4, as authorized by City Council, we implemented the new Drug Screening Policy requiring training for 180 managers and supervisors (again, this 4 required training materials and information on procedures to handle I situations with employees; it, further, required the needed materials for them to adequately explain this change to employees); j i i I , , t , August 18, 1991 Memo to 8, McKean - Response to City Council on 1991192 Proposed Budget Page 2 f 5. As a part of our commitment to Affirmative Action, as authorized by City Council, we made an intensive effort for Pulice and Fire entry exams; this required the copying of approximately 400 recruitment packets to prospective applicants, as well as conducting special orientation sessions; and Y 6, obviously, the Personnel function is highly "paper" intensive because of our involvement in ensuring effective communication with all employees; as such, normal inflationary increases for general office supplies affect our operational costs more i i we requested and received $135 additional funding in our books and magazine account (08102) for publications and information related to .he now Americans With Disabilities Act in order to prepare ourselves and managers/supervisors on this upcoming implementation, We requested and were authorized by Council for i11i8 additioral funding in , the postage account (08109) to cover mailings of the 400 Police and Fire entry exam recruitment packets, With the proposed 1991/92 Budget, the overall Supplies budget is recommended at $39,177. This represents a proposed overall increase of $3,206, The , increased funding is needed to continue the implementation activities with I Mercer. We have es*imated that the costs for processing emp'oyee payroll documents to completo all changes to the Employee Informatior System computer mainframe) at $1,609, With the Health Insurance St.dycurrrentiy being finalized, we are anticipating a change to that program that will be I more cost effective and with improved services, This will recuire a significant communication effort during open enrollmerr', in order to effectively inform employees of new coverages, medical prr,viders, Xremium rates, etc, Thus, an additional $1,306 is included in arn,r proposed office supplies account, Further, to ensure we conduct effective follow-up communication for employees on these important organizational chafrges, we are expecting a increase to produce the Employee Newsletter once a month. The Employee Newsletter is a vital communication link and .c^tdlns important information to keep employees updated on various city-wide events/activities (including Health Insurance, Mercer activities, etc.) and a message from the City Manager, The proposed increase for this is $1,900, ;I' ;~fvicee ~4.gounts ' f The Services accounts in The Personnel/Employee Relations Deoartment funds the following line items - telephones, special services (employee physical& and Civil Service Exams), travel, advertising, dues & publications, hire of { equipment (Xerox copier payments), prison meals (service Awards Program), manpower services, employee training, and the tuition reimbursement program, 7 The overall 1989/90 Budget for Services at,ounts were approved by City Council at $67,938, r N i , , August 16, 1991 Memo to B. McKean - Response to city council on 1991/92 Proposed Budget 1 Page 3 F Again, last year, we discussed with the City Council the Justification for the 1990/91 Services budget. This was approved at $66,965. Tha approved increase was $9,027 and were necessary to cover, 1. In the special services account (08502) - $6,462, for an anti71pated 25 additional employee medical physicals and for funding of Police and Fire } entry and promotional exams for the Police and Fire Departments due to } retirements and turnover; 1 - 1 Entry Police Exams - S 1,600 - 1 Entry Fire Exam - 2,100 - 3 Promotional Exams (Police and Fire) - $3,300 j 2, because of turnover in professional staff in the Personnel Department, an f virtually every new individual in a position has come to the position gith little formal training in the human resource management field (Selection and Placement, Compensation/Classification, Benefits and s Insurance, Training and Development, etc.). Knowledge of specific laws (EEO/Affirmative Action, Pair Labor Standards Act, State Civil Service i Law, Immigration Reform and Control Act, Age Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, etc.) and the practical handling of the employment operate the City y properly and s to for us t process is critically Important legally. Thus, the Council authorized an additional $2,812 in the travel and schools and seminars accounts (08603 and 08622) to provide training # and development for the new staff members in their respective professional areas; 3, the meals account (08611 - identified in the budget as prison meals) was 1 increased an additional $1,397 because of an increase of 51 more participants and recipients at Annual Service Awards Program banquet, i The 1991/92 Proposed Budget for Services expenditures is recommended at $67,392, or a $427 increase over the 90/91 Budget approved by the City Council. Although the overall increase is $427, the tuition reimbursement account (08632) is proposed at $B,OOO. This is $4,000 above previous year's funding because, in the last 3 years, participation has continued to increase. In 1989/90, we had a total of 34 employees receive reimbursement for oompletlny courses toward degrees at the local universities. 41e are anticipating that to double participation in 1991/92, in addition, collage tuition costs have been raising steadily over this timo and the recent budget approved by the state legislature increases these fees further. This program assiots our employees in improving their knowledge in specific fields of study that benefit the City. Over the near-term, we benefit by improved ability in an employee's current job, Over the long-term, the City j is preparing employees to improve their candidacy for promotion, and we are 1 preparing our future leaders for the organization. ( August 16, 1991 Memo to B. McKean -Response ~o City Council on 1991/92 Proposed Budget Page 4 Please let me know if you need other information or a clarification on this, ,c 1 Thank you. ~s r r Thomas W, Kllnck i ' Director, Personnel/gmployee Relations 1 ,t i 1 i i 5S f f ~ 1 00108c,prn E 8/18/91 2;45p T i ' Serving the titles of Bryan, Denton, Garland & GreenyN Is, s August 15, 1991 Mr; Bob Corder. Chairman, Planning and Operating Committee P:O, Box 459002 Garland, TX 75045 Dear Bobs _ Y appreciate being able to attend your meeting on July 25, 1991. It was clear to me that you have the best interests of the customers of your individual Citfes as a high priority r: At this meeting, and T pretume at previous meetings, you discussed a proposal for rebating to the Cities certain excess funds of the Agency which are not reserved or allocated for Agency use. From the discussion it was obvious that some of the Member Cities have been informed that the Agency is planning to rebate excess funds to the Member Cities this Fall. 1 ' Please be advised that, as of this date, the rebate proposal has not been acted i on by the Agency's Board of Oirectors, and thus no action 1141 been taken. to provide fora rebate. Therefore, 1 request, when the rebate proposal is being discussed in your City, that you inform those involved in the discussion that the rebate proposal is, at this tune, only a proposal, and that neither a rebate nor i an amount iias been acted on by the Agency's Board, Sincerely F, W. Rapp President, Bcard of Directors f.WR/dv f cc's Yom Jefferies { W, R. Allen Taw Mw**ol Po" Aaw" P,U, Sou 7000 lsquo 'Tow "am (~Oe} 8?3-e019 t ~I VA, , S TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY SCHEOULE Of ACCUMULATFO EXCESS EARNINGS MAY 31, 7.991 (USE)/3ROW RESERYEdt 1485 1986 1987 1~BB 1984 1990 TNRU MAY bALAN~E Construction $ 0 $3,525 $ 5,725 $ 60015 $ 9057 ;11057 # 11333 #12,390 Emergency 0 0 0 1,000 10000 10000 0 11000 Risk Management 0 0 0 0 1,003 1,x93 507 26100 Rate Stabilization _ 0 0 0 14 200 874 IL L154) 1.668 E Reserved Total $ 0 $3,525 $ 5,725 $ 7,015 $25,260 $22,4%4 $ 684 $23,158 UNRESERVED? 1 Unreserved Total $110383 $6,432 $ 5,942 $19,064 $ 6,313 $ 60313 0 6,313 i Total Accuw Excess $1 8 $9 95 $11. 667 $26.018 $3.1_73 # # 684.E I Status at May 310 19911 1140 Stabilization Funds Unreserved Excess Earnings $ 1,6b8 $13,981 Lesss Reserved for facility Improveaxants $ 3,J"3G Rate Stabilization Carry Forward to FY'92 1,bOO x.390 f E Status - Net of Requirewrents 9 May 310 1991 # ! V . -.b.IetKnfnrv: r ! nef t:.+ ana u4WUµaa a, f. .enw. .h- a.. r-. a i~ d , , 1 (S) such other services as the Agency and a City, from time to time, shalt determine to be appropriate and necessary, (b) City hereby binds Itself to pay for the cost of. the services that are to be provided by the Agency pursuant to Subsection (a) of this Section 4, such payment to be made at the rates and charges established pursuant to Section 7 of this Contract, i Section sr lkltrery of Power ace) Ewa, (a) The Power and Energy to be furnished under fhb Contract shall be alternating current, sixty (60) hetu, three-phase, subject to conditions of delivery and measurement as hereinafter provided, I (b) The Points of Delivery, delivery voltage and other conditions of service shalt be in accordance with the service speclHcadons set forth In Exhibit A attached to this Contract, as amended by tho Agency and the concerned C:Ity from time to time, ' (c) The City shall make and pay for all connections between Its facilities and the System owned by or available to the Agency at the Points of Delivery, The City shell Install, own and maintain any i f necessary substation equipment at the Points of Delivery from the System of or svallobte to the Agency ? s and shall instal), own and maintain switching and protective equipment of adequate design and sufficient capacity beyond such Points of Delivery to enable the City to take and use the Power and Energy i supplied under this Contract without hazard to the System, In the event that the Points of Delivery set forth In Exhibit A are not on the City's electric system, the City shall arrange for transmisslon of Power and Energy sold under this Contract to its system, including the Installation and maintenance of any (acUldes required for it to mceiva such Power and Energy into Its system, (d) Except as othe rwise agreed, materin aqui s g pmet,t shall be furnished, installed and maintained by the Agency at each Point of Delivery to the City at the low voltage side of the transforming equipment e1 located there. Loss adjustments for low voltage side or remote metering shall be as specified In sold ` Exhibit A or as otherwise agreed by the parties. Section 61 Annual System 'Judgef (u) The Agency shall prepare or cause to he proparctl an Annual System Budget at least ninety (40) days prior to the beginning of each Contract Year which shall Itemize estimates of Annual System Costs anti all revenues, Income or other funds to he applied to such Annual System Costa for and appllcablo to such Contract Year. Such Amtual System Sudget shall also utilize and take Imp account fnrecaso, which shall be furnished by each City to the Agency at feast one hundred S twenty (120) da,s prior to the beginning of such Contract Year, of the monthly peak Power and Energy i requirements estimated to be obtained from the Agency during such Contract year. (b) After consideration of any comments of the Cidei, the Agency, not less then thirty (St)) days prior to the beginning of such Contract Year, shrill adopt an Annua(System Budget Year and the rates and charges for Power and Energy to be furnished and heservices tosbe performed during such Contract Year and shall cause copies of such Annual System Budget and ralas and charges to be delivered to the Citics. Provided, however, the Annual System Budget fat the 11111 Contract Year shall be prepared, considered, adopted and delivered In the manner which the Agency deems best. (c) 11, at any time or from time to time after the adoption of the Annual System Audgel In accordance with Subsectior, tb) of this Section 6, he Agency estimates that the Annual System Costs (if revenues for the Contract Year or any part thereof for which such Annual System Budget applles j wilt be greater or less then the Annual System Costs or revenues set forth In the Annual System ° I Budget, or that the amount of power and Energy which the Agency expects to deliver during such I Contract Year or any part thereof is greater or less than the amount of Power and Energy which the 1 s ' r... E Agency estimated at the time of adoptlon of the Annual System Budget would have bean delivered during such Contract Year, then the Agency may prepare an amended and Annual System transmitted ro the t, The amended Annual System Budget shall be timely adopted by the Agency Clsie& (d) in the event a budget for the ensuing Contract Year has not been adopted an or before the first day of the Contract Year, the total amount budgeted for the preceding Contract Year shall be the total amount of the temporary budget toy such purposes for the ensuing Contract Year, The E temporary budget shall be effective only until such time as a pertnmatt budget has been finally adopted f t, and approved, t t , The chief administrative officer of the Agency shall be responsible for the allocation for expenditure of the total amount of the temporary budget until a permanent budget Is adopted and approved, 1~ { r , SeMWO 71 Rata awl Chains (a) The rates and charges of the Agency to the Cities for Power and Energy and for services supplkd shall be: (t) nondiscriminatory, and t (2) fair and reasonable, and be based upon the cost of providing the Power and Energy or providing the service with respect to which the rate or charge is based. and (3) adequate (after taking Into comiderailan other moneys received or anticipated to be received) In each Contract Year to pay or make provision for paying Annual System Costs, (b) When the Board of Directors proposes to establish a new rate or charge, as determined under Schedule B. it shall give each City written notice that it proposes to establish a nave rata or charge for Power and Energy or for services (setting forth such charge) an a date certain (which shall not be Ion than 120 days from the malling of tha notice to each City, all such notices to be mailed simultaneously), Except as provided In paragraph (c) hereof, no charge or adjustment in any we or charge made by the Agency shall be elfemve it any City, by resolution or ordinance of Its governing body, enters in objection to such adjustment In a Cato and charge by causing to be filed with the chief adry:lnistrative officer of the Agency a copy of such resatutlon or ordinance move than 30 days prior to the suggested effective date of the proposed new rate or charge, In the event a City enters on objection to the charge or adjustment In a rate or charge, the effective date of the charge ov adjustment shall be postponed pending the naoludoo of the dispute In the following manner, i (1) Thos Gilles may jointly select an independent consultant or consultants to prepare a rate styaWatloa and schedule of proposed rates and charges, provided If suah joint selection Is not w4chs withln 30 calendar days of the filing of art objectlon (evidenced by the paseage of a resolution of ordiawwo) such Independent consultant shall be appointed by.the hoard of Ditutors of the Agency; (2) the report of the Independent consultant shall be submitted to the AkIncy, and each Clty for consideration, and I (3) U the report of the Independent consultant is approved by the governing bodles of the Agency and the Cities the same shall be effective as of the date originally suggested by the t Agency Lt Its notlce, It the adjustment is not approved or an agreement reached within Ix days after the receipt of the report of the Independent consultant, then the Agency and the Cities shall each have all of the rights and remedies at law and in equity except that In no event shall any City be relieved of its obligation to the holders of Bonds under Section 13 or 14 of this Contract, ,.A.r kr r OWNS, r++~ "ON t/h~ r y"~ (w"MM F r Aga, , r~earcmiuttu J.-.----- ' f ~ i 3 i } City of Denton Salary Management Program F i !'resented by: Thomas M. Riley Cathleen Chambliss ` August 1901 William N:, Mercer, Incorporated 9500 Texas Commerce Tower 2200 Ross Avenue Dallas, Texas 75201 4 I` (214) 220.3500 1 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I - Project Summary . . . . . . . . . 1 Section It - Appeals Procedure , , 20 Section III - Next Steps . . . . 23 Exhibits A. Position Responsibility Questionnaire j B. Evaluation Plan Weightings C. Market Analysis j D. Sources of Competitive Data E, City-wide Salary Structure F. City-wide Grade Assignments 0. Police Pay Structure 1 H. Fire Pay Structure j I. Police Recruit Pay Structure 1 J. Fire Recruit Pay Structure K Seasonal Pay Structure I.. Executive Salary Structure M. Sample Performance Guideline Chart - Exempt f N. Sample Performance Guideline Chart - Nonexempt 1 , l 1 ~y~u~y„nlapax.t.+ ~ ..,....x•.n. <N afce.,llK .1 F ~M ! } 1 i r I ~ SECTION I Project summary I I I f' Ir irPa^".'~'lal1.LIN.kY evr r. i 3 Sg1AA~+X~ YYY a hry., pop f t t a PROJECT SUMMARY Background salary William M. Mercer, Incorlmrated (Mercer) was retain employees by the In approximately 240 posit ions, 'rho rprojectVes bei g l management program. Thta study includes about 1,000 I conducted to simplify and streamline the salary management program while ensuring the City's compensation practices are competitive and equitable. to be inning the project, the scope and objectives of the study were discussed and the steps necessary to complete the i Prior S! study were outlined, The major activities in conducting the study are briefly discussed below; Project Approach , phase It Internal Equity At Mercer consultants conducted 20 interviews with City In cider to gain a better understanding of the organization, interviewsAll Division Managers and , management including the City Manager, all Executive Directors, and all Directors. ~ Superintendents were also given the opportunity to participate in group discussion e discussions allowed us to hear, first-hand, management's concerns regarding f the salary inis ration process. We y Thes specific areas discussed the strengths and weaknesses of the current system 'hidden a endas;' as well as the ovetatl culture of the philosophy of the City as it currently is and as It should be, any g Importance of ; City. We also discussed the compensable factors which are important to the City including the relative Page 1 C11y of ton 3alsry MacuWaitnt Prolt sw r i dh~'Yi'6} I 4 1 lAMM WN" WYiN' !wo-~ .y v"^"^... 1 PROJECT SUMMARY (Continued) i management skills versus technical requirements. The issue of "pay-for-performance" versus a step-rate or longevity program was also discussed. In addition to our meetings with City management, we met with members of the City Council to gain their perspective and guidance on any changes to the compensation program, I ~ B. Compensation Philosophy 1 During this period, the Executive Directors discussed and agreed upon a recommended new compensation philosophy reflecting the City's desire to have a market based system which is also internally equitable and recognizes a job's value to the City. The Executive Directors' recommended new compensation philosophy states: It Is the philosophy of the City to compensate employees in direct relation to the value of the position and their j contributions to the success of the City and their Department goals and objectives, - The City will strive to be competitive at the 50th percentile of the composite market based on actual salaries paid s within the market. The following objectives were also recommended by the Executive Directors; • To provide a systematic and organized approach for the administration of salaries, ; - To provide equitable compensation that is based upon the value of a position and the work performed. To maintain competitive rates of compensation that will enable the City to attract, retain, and motivate quality, high performing and competent employees. • To actively involve management and supervisory personnel in the administration of compensation. - To provide a system that includes recognition for individual performance, development and advancement. • To enable management to plan and control overall levels of compensation consistent with economic conditions of the City. City of Denton Salary Management Program Page 2 i PROJECT SUMMARY (Continued) e evaluation To support these objectives, the City also develop iced i Utility other technically for the arientedooperatians atrdrwou d striv recorumended strategy recognizes that the City operates an E required of these to compensate for the special technical talents and upervi straten Skijl~s and lndivi~ ual Fundamental ositions, The by the Executive Directors addresses Basic o ( Contributor Skills, i C. Ouestioan_a rye lyevelWFnent Based on the recommended compensation philosophy, information gained through our interviews as well as prior studies, Mercer developed a Position Responsibility Questionnaire to be completed by all employees. This questionnaire would serve two purposes: First, it would be a means to gather current information about all jobs for a to eventateoa 1 jobs s dptiorvs; a Secondly, the questionnaire would allow us, with the assistance of computer preliminary tanking of jobs on a departmental and City-wide basis, t ~ Since the questionnaire was to serve as the foundation for the job evaluation These factors designed to address each of the compensable factors to be included in the job evaluation plan. Knowledge Budgeting/Plarming Skills Contacts Local Government Skills ~ Work Environment Technical requirements Hazards Originality/Creativity H t ` Decision Making Direction of Others i i Page 3 City at Denton Salem Maneetomt PrdgKUm e 1 PROjECT SUMMARY (Continued) _ --the rs. bei Sstaff) usedthe responses to eaichr of oche ~ Once the questionnaire was developed, it was re sable factors were Personnel questionnaire was This was done to ensure the appropriate compen , d the overall the ng of the City information about the technical skills questions correctly addressed the various levels performed suitable for the City's culture. Because of the importance mat( a Services Electric(Wateraetg)ment and professional required of each position, the questionnaire was also reviewed by o employees with technical responsibilities (Engineering, After several sets of revisions, the questionnaire was then tested in a proctored session on 40 employees representing a crass-section of the City. This allowed us to determine if employees had any problems understanding the questions and if the levels of responses seemed adequate to reflect the variations in City jobs. Some questions were reworded for clarity and some Based on this test session, the questionnaire was again revised. responses were revised to achieve a better reflection of the diversity of jobs in the City. I The final Position Responsibility Questionnaire is shown in P.xhibit A. D. t irb mcletion j uestlonnaires After the questionnaire was finallmd, copies were distributed to all employees for their completion. The q were then reviewed by each level of management. This included the employee's Immediate supervisor, Division Manager Superintendent, Director and Executive Director. 'T'hese reviews were done to ensure the completed questionnaire a or adequately reflected the responsibilities of that job, Where appropriate, changes were made. Each reviewer initialized } every page to indicate the review had been completed, Page 4 City of venwn salary Managrewmt PrOINNa 11 4 - - (Continued) PROJECT SUMMARY We had scheduled about four weeks for this process, In reality, it took over three months. L-Iowever, the delay was felt to be necessary to give all managers adequate time for review. 1. Outs. a s s Each questionnaire was coded by the Personnel staff and then forwarded on to Mercer. The questionnaires were reviewed by Mercer consultants; comments were read; questions were resolved. Then all questionnaires were key } l punched and the data loaded into our software package called CompMa.sler". evaluation one uation looks at jobs--not incumbents. Therefore, each distinctlydiffferent jo ca nly ha jobs existed and then Job oval we bad to first determine where different though it has multiple incumbents, Thus, , r develop one evaluation based on the multiple responses, with multiple incumbents, initially looking nt variance in rr`espoennseWetor a if iitdWaeonee~ten We reviewed each of the johs rhaps misclassif;edr When major differences were nts or if some incumbents were pe comments describing the job as well as the responses to each of the compensable factors. e~ fn further anal'mm end indicated the Incumbents were net all performing the same job then the ineumbent was flagged review. the same job, we took tho most frequent response to each question and incumbents were all performing When multiple used that as the evaluation. I 6 Page 5 i city of DOW SatAry Menwoedt PrV* .r... _m 1ANM1{AI U... iQQ(tt 5'i9'tl La~ IYd~ ~YI.N 1'.1iM.~ M.Y.u~ I t 11111 '101.1111111 PROJECT SUMMARY (Continued) 1 i, F. Rewftepta RanYings_ to the City so they are not "weighted" equally in the evaluation Not every compensabie factor has an equal importance factors roar experience plan, Mercer consultants developed a suggested plan weighting for Aea~ were of the used to prepare a department ranking for and input from management. These weightings (shown in Exhibit ) each Executive Director/Director to review, ' ire.ctors/Directors noted any concerns they had about the rankings and w~; reviewed these for possible The N_Aecutive D At this same rime, Asercer const►ltants were reviewing all of the evaluations for consistency' across realignments. e artments, Some evaluations were revised to reflect the Executive DirectorsiDlreetars changes; others were revL+ed dp to reflect consistent City-wide evaluations, G. iC kyWide~nwnt4 ranking of all jabs for review by the Executive Directors. The Executive were reviewed itndwhen appropriate, Mercer consultants then developed a City-wide noted some positions which seemed to be out ml alignment and these Directors ; adjustments were Miele. L_ H. UrS---- cCi°ti°n' y All working jk7b descriptions have been studied and have been updated to reflect current, new major duffles and descri tiaras also reilect the, minimum qualifications for performing the job as well as the responsiblilties, nest job p tors which Indicate the level of contribution for cacti compensability factor. Jab descriptions and minimunt specific fac t Page 6' i City of Denton Salary Ma"WKWO PrWOM 1 " ~~'Ayy~}SioilvrMva w t.:r w. I .I' t n PROJECT SUMMARY (Continued) { qualifications serve as the beginning point for recruitr._... of candidates for filling a job as well as a guide in training a new Individual in perfornuing the job. l I We recommend job descriptions be reviewed at least every three years to ensure any changes In job duties and responsibilities are reflected in the job description. Reviewing approximately one-third of all descriptions each year will ensure the job descriptions are current. Project Approach • Phase Ill Market Analysis and Salary Structure Design A. Market Analysis Each year, the Personnel Department conducts a market analysis to determine the City's relative position In the competitive labor market. As a part of this study, Mercer conducted an independent analysis of the competitive marketplace in order to determine the City's relative position in the competitive labor market. This provided us with ! data regarding the external value of jobs which could then be combined with the internal value of jobs (determined through the job evaluation process) to develop an overall salary structure for the City which would allow the City to competitively recruit in the market for new employees and retain competont current employees, For purposes of collecting competitive market data, the Executive Directors determined which cities and local Denton) employers make up the City's local market. These choices were based on who the City recrults newemployees front and who the City loses employees to. The City draws qualified applicants from local Denton employers (including governmental entities, private companies and universities) for most non-exempt positions and from the Metroplex for E i City of Denim Wary Manftm et P"mm Page 7 h 1 i IN i 7. VIIINV Iluu/.oM NWW 'uni✓.i .-.s1 I-"'.."~ !..r-..y ~'^^.1 I I l 1 1 I } I PROJECT SUMMARY (Continued) most professional, mid-management and executive positions. Some specific cities and other organizations were selected for positions in the Utility Operations since these positions would only be found In cities or other organizations operating an electric or water/wastewater utility. Mercer contacted each of the selected cities to solicit current pay data. The Personnel Department also conducted Its annual market survey which included the selected cities as well its the other organizational entities selected by the Executive Directors, We cross-referenced the data collected by Mercer and the City to ensure we had accurate data and valid matches, ' This data was supplemented with data from the 1990 Denton Personnel Association Survey, the 1991 Texas Municipal League Survey and the 1991 North Texas Council of Governments Survey. When developing a new salary structure through job evaluation, our experience Indicates that competitive data Is needed on about 25-30% of the jobs, Mercer and Denton's Personnel Department were able to locate market data for 41% i of the positions in the City. This Is significantly more than what is necessary but provides a much better link to the marketplace to ensure employees are paid competitively, i As shown in Exhibit C, the City's overall competitive position is at 87% of the competitive market. Mereer recommends that to be. competitive the City should be within ±10% of the average market rates. When reviewing the date outlined in Exhibit C, it is Important to remember that these comparisons were made job to job and did not consider the incumbents in these jobs, Each individual situation, Including time in position, full knowledge. of duties and f responsibilities as well as individual performance levels should be considered when determining whether an employee is competitively compensated, Page 8 city of Nnton Salary Maass mnt PrW*m stain Y~~~<,, ,~<I w•..... t 1 PROJECT SUMMAkY (Continued) f The cities and local Denton employers which were included In our analysis are shown in l4A bit D. B. Salary Structure Development k Salary structures are used to provide a process to administer compensation in an equitable and uniform manner for i employees in their respective civil service and non civil service categories, The internal values of each position Is established through the job analysis process. The external value of each position is determined through market analysis. Using both the job analysis and the market annlysis, positions are grouped by similar value. Salary ranges and grades are then set based on these groupings of jobs and the competitive market. Future adjustments in the competitive market will be applied to the salary structure based on the fiscal capabilities of the City, Non Clva stoke Based on the City's recommended compensation philmiophy, we developed a pay system for non civil service positions i designed to provide a range of pay which reflects the internal and external value of each position. This structure lends itself to a pay-for-performance system (explained in Phase III of this report), livery position has been assigned to a grade (e.g, a grouping of positions) which has a minimum, midpoint and maximum level of pay. The minimum is I' established for employees who are relatively new in the position and still learning the duties and responsibilities required of the job, The midpoint is for employees who are performing all of the duties and responsibilities of the job In a fully proficient manner, For Individuals who have fully mastered the duties and responsibilities of the job and have progressed ff beyond the.normal expectations of the position, a maximum value has been established, This is the maximum amount the City is willing to pay anyone functioning In a given position. City of Denton Salary Management Program Page 9 . r~r•ti 4 PROJECT SUMMARY (fontlnued) titive rates of compensation, the salary ranges A consistent In order to develop a salary structure which allows the City to pay compe I ( were established with the midpoint reflecting the averageem hke aaaetao enp relic ur contained Cture was developed so that percentage increase was used between the midpoints of as employees move up in the system, the increases are unifor a a the resultingaca p ession ws used to allow for meaningful increases and to reduce the amount of overlap in salary grade g and occur if midpoints are too close. Based on the spread in the lowest and highest competitive supervisor pay which can grades were established. market rates and the 12%a between midpoints, thirteen (13) y s calculated as 80% of the midpoint (or competitive rate) and the maximum of each and should allow sufficient The minimum of each grade wa grade was set at 120% of the midpoint, t, o~ it pknowledge,Oskiliscnd abit ties ach salary range ; salary growth potential as employees grow grade based on the external market data and the internal value determined Jobs were then placed in the appropriate through the weighted compensable factors. A City~wlde City-wide salary structure is recommended for all positions excep For civil Seel administrative seasonal and executives. A purposes onlYl the structure has structure will ensure internal equity is maintained across th iCity City Serviceljvlaintenance, office, Support/Clerical, k been divided into the pay plans currently used by ( ~ , . Technical/Paraprofessional, Professional, and Management/Supervisory.) ' recommended salary structure is shown in Exhibit U; the placement of jobs in the structure. is shown in exhibit F. i The t , Page 10` city of DM WO Salary Hanattoont program ~4'.rd,~'l,S+k~Wt+ w..~w W I%D A 2 4 f PROJECT SUMMARY (Continued) Civil Service Because of the requirements mandated r under these taositions,swe collected market data on starting rates of were developed for the civil service positions in Police and Fire. Fo p average actual pay. It is important for the City to maintain competitive rates of pay for the positions of Police Officers and Fire Fighters k zitians are the only positions in the Police and Fire Departments for which the City recruits. Because since these entry po.. promotion tames only through competitive written examinations and command ranks are only ' of State Civil Service Law, 4 i ' filled from within the Department. Civil service employees cannot leave the City for another civil service position unless he/she is willing to start all over at an entry level position. It is important to compensate civil service positions competitively to ensure proper growth and motivation. 1 The recommended 1991/1992 pay structures for Police and Fire are shown in Exhibits G and N. The recommended structures for the Recruit positions are shown In Exhibits I and J. Each year the Personnel Department will determine how much the market has ed and awha s t the City t'' maintain the' posture is compared to other cities in the area. Structural adjustments will be recommended competitive position of the City, given the fiscal constraints on the City's ability to adjust wage structures, Provided the City's budget can afford adjustments to payroll, the command positions will have a new step added next year in an effort to bring those positions closer to market. New Incumbents will be paid at the base rata for the position. S . . ~ Page 11 i City of Denton So" M~A "t Program ; Zl. titiY.Pal ~aey ,nw.... •,1 A 4 1 PROJECT SUMMARY (Continued) seasonal thus (swimming pool, positions at parks the mCity are primarily found in the Parks and Recreation Department due to its seasonal programs Seasonal definition, these are short term positions ns and ~ needs aintenance, recreation programs, etc.) EY and provide flexibility staffing streamline the recruitment competitive been developed' seasonal positions based on , I vacancies need to be filled 9~1nkaY•five order 1 change from season to season, market rates. current current due to structure for our commended structure for seasonal positions is shown In '~~2j19~9.3 budget praunpnsal. The understanding that ` The re art of management budget constraints, this structure will be a p seasonal positions will remain in effect until that time. for-performance mrthodolagy, the recommended Rvecutlves structure and pay recO With respect to job analysis, market analysis, salary increases nn sation and Incentive Program is consistent with the salary ande rov;desl or sa{ary mmended for based non- e Executive Comp~n olive marketplace P civil service employees. It ties compensation to the wmpe City. ance of the individual and his/her increasing value to tha~ket dat0n nee. an eased.eH1e\'evere all executives h the perform would ut ons would no longer be eligible for any base salary increases until the m theolangCiterm contributions attd ie for the Long Term Business Stratrgy Incentive Program e ghoe reward be eligible lashing t assisting the City Council and City Manager in accomp the Ci Mana development of the City. gcr based on his/her The amount of the incentive would be determined by tY assessment of the individual's performanc4l 4 Executive nsition~ is shown in Exhibit L t The recommended structure for Exec p Vage 1.2 h City or t)eaton Salary Manaliement Prosraw :t:AJ~,9,dR441+d„YA4~+R r: r+.u... w.. f h 5 PROJECT SUMMARY (Continued) } I { 1. Cost Analysis i Mercer recommends all employees (with acceptable performance) whose salaries fall below the proposed minimum salary for the new assigned grade for their position receive salary increases to bring them up to minimum. Vic; have calculated the cost of such a move based on the current individual employee database. Based on this current employee database, we anticipate it will cost approximately $244,072 to bring all employees up to the minimum of their pay range. Project Approach - Phase IIIt Performance Management Program Review As a part of this study, Mercer reviewed the City's Performance Management Program looking at the methodology used to J conduct performance evaluations as well as the link between individual performance and the distribution of merit increase j dollars, i A. Revim, of the Current PeE orniance Evaluation, tro>zram Performance evaluations for non-exempt employees are related to the job's dutles and responsibilities and include three levels of performance, "Consistently Exceeds", "Meets Requirements" and "Needs Improvement". Although it is impoestbie ! to take all subjectivity out of an evaluation program, if administered and monitored properly, this program should provide j fair and objectii• feedback oil job performatce and allow for equitable and consistent eval+iatlons of employees across departments. E ` t Performance evaluations for exempt and management employees are also related to the job's duties and responsibilities City of unto„ Salary Manarmmi Progmat Page 13 ,,h> awl 3 PROJECT SUMMARY (Continued) geting as well as other necessary professional and management skills (Communication, Planning and Bud, Administrative Reporting, etc.) Again, if administered and monitored properly, this program should result in fair and objective feedback to employees on a consistent basis across departments. The management and exempt program can be improved by s for some identification of levels of performance such as "Far F,xreeds", "Frequently Exceeds", "Meets providing ; Requirements", and "Needs Improvement". ~ fora roximately eleven years. When this original The current merit increase program has been used by Y levels. Since the City had not previously tried to program was implemented, it was tied to "satisfactoryperformance differentiate performance levels, it was decided to phase in the merit system and only differentiate between those expectations and those employees not meeting expectations. Unsatisfactory employees did not receive employees meeting and to recognize p~r,pethe rformiana%~u1d begin training a merit increase; all ll satisfactory employees received the same increase. In this managers/supervisors in how to conduct performance appraisals istratic)n The program did allow for recognition of above average performance. a However, able to in th compense ie their emplfoyees forogra r with the limited salary increase dollars available, very few manager outstanding performance. The fiscal constraints of the City forced most managers to grant the same salary Increase to all satisfactory and above employees. ~ B. ,,pna~tiona [or a P.~v Fni' 1~erforntance Svatem (;I d on the Based on the City's stated compensation philosophy, the City's goal inis to pay dividuat employees contretbutivns andrelaperforrtive lcoef the position to the organization as well as to recognize and reward end th In order to reward employees for their performance, we recomm:~ City enhance the current merit program and i 1'age;14 ; I . City of Denton Salary MIIUWMnt ProgMft i .Ya1ww1 M11✓MiM~ fS.tlt. i, .u-.M , { PROJECT SUMMARY (Continued) Implement a purer pay-for-performance program. The City will Improve its performance management program by managing an employee's pay In relation to the value of bring all the job (both Internally and in the marketplace). Basically this theim erased knowledge, kills alnd abil,ltiesa To assist employees up to midpoint (the value of the job) in concert with the City with this process, the proposed salary ranges have been divided into four equal sections called quartiles. This makes it easy to track employees as they move through the salary range. When an employee's salary has passed the midpoint and has moved Into the third quartile, the City will still make salary adjustments for performance but at a lesser ; rate of increase since at this point the employee will be paid abovPa, market. Once an employee's salary is in the fourth quartile, the City will no longer grant salary increases (rolled Into base salary) but instead will reward performance through lump sum incentives. The maximum of the salary range represents the most the City Is vAlling to pay for any fob. Any employees who are currently over the range maximum will also no longer receive salary Increases but may receive lump sum incentives based on their performance. Budgetary controls have been implemented which limit the rof employees number of employees which can receive an appraisal of outstanding clvi seto 10% of the toal rvice and seasonal employees). participating in the pay-for-performance program (e.& exclusive The new system will allow the City to reallocate the merit dollars to reward outstanding performance without requiring additional funding. A proposed performance increase guideline chart has been developed to assist managers/supervisors in determining the appropriate salary increase to award to an employee based on hia(her performance. The chart is set up in a matrix format with the y-axis being the employee's overall performance rating and the x-axis being the placement of the employee's pay In the salary range. To determine an employee's percentage increase, the manager/supervisor finds the Page 15 City of Denton 5slxry TranWwent Program L Af;.Jttla~ j fY y d~ f fa 1 j PROJECT SUMMARY (Continued) performance levei and quartile on the matrix; where these two lines intersect, the suggested percentage increase is indicated, r Sample performance guideline charts are shown in Exhibits M and N. The established matrix percentages are a budgetary item which will need to he approved each year by the City Council as part of the total compensation program. I ~ Future adjustments for shifts in the market will br applied to the salary ranges only and not to an individual employee's base rate of pay. Thus, the City will be able to maintain the competitiveness of its pay program and focus any approved funding for salary Increases into the pay-for-performance program, C. Budittina for Employee Salary l;nnemna Each year, Directors will be allotted an amount of money for them to grant employee salary increases to be called Performance Rating Increases (PRI). This PRI budget will be determined for each Director based on the approved pay- for-performance budget. It is up to each Director to ensure the salary Increases awarded in his/her department stay within the established merit budget. When the PRI budget has been distributed, no other employees will be granted salary Increases for that year. Therefore, when above average Performance Rating Increases are granted, there must also be some below average awards. `I For most departments, this should pose no real problem since most employees will be rated "Meets Expectations". The number of outstanding performers Is typically about equal to the number of employees that need improvement, For E ~ smaller departments (under 30 employees), however, At Is difficult to stay within the m°rit budget every year and All reward the outstanding performers. The law of averages will not work every year for these small departments. i City or Dtnton Salary MsaWwent Program Page 16 i ! {t'~r~1i15~!4~~kid6il Rtarrvw.v n.r a.. ...._._.r nn ru. w... .,.r... t `ry. f PROJECT SUMMARY (Continued) I f For this reason, we recommend establishing a PRI budget equal to 1-2% of the overall pay-For-performance budget, With the City Manager's approval, a Director can reward outstanding performance from this special merit budget without. ' penalizing the other employees in the department by arbitrarily reducing all performance appraisals. Typically these i requests for exceptions will be come from the Directors of the smaller departments since it will be,, more difficult to meet their merit budget each and every year. It should be noted that this special merit pool should not be considered a fund I which will automatically be spent every year. All Directors should be held accountable for staying within their merit i budget and should only be allnwed to award a salary increase from the special PRI budget when truly outstanding performance would go unrewarded otherwise. r Mercer will work with the City to finalize next year's PRI budget and assist with cost analysis. ~I 1). Monltorint Performance Appraisals and Salary )(pWgses 1 As a part of this study, a software package called CompMaster"' has been installed on the computer in the Personnel and Employee Relations Department. In addition to monitoring job evaluations and competitive data, this system will also allow the City to track performance appraisals and employee salary increases, The Personnel Department will be able to monitor the appraisals conducted in each department and the corresponding salary increases. The Personnel Director can then counsel with departments which continually rate all employees outstanding as well as those that tend towards all "Meets Expectationt", Budgetary controls have been implemented which limit the number of employees which can receive an appraisal of outstanding to 10% of the total number of employees participating In the pay-f6r. i performance program (e.g. exclusive of civil service and seasonal employees). The CompMaster" software package will make it easier for the City to monitor trends in performance evaluations and thus properly control the distribution of merit Increases. City or Delta, Wory Manwwmi Props= Page 17 1 1 k yrr,...t k PAS] M r i f PROJECT SUMMARY (Continued) i The historical data on performance appraisal ratings can then be used the next year when preparing the new performance increase guideline chart. The software package will provide the Personnel Director with a lot of flexibility when developing a new matrix to fit the City's budget. Project Approach - Phase IV: Final Report, Installation and Monitoring A. Training of Personnel Staff We have worked closely with the City's Personnel staff to ensure that each step of the program has been understood. ! The CompMaster" software package that will be used to monitor and administer the program on an on-going basis has E been installed on a computer in the Personnel and Employee Relations Department. We have provided training for several employees In the department and will continue to provide technical support and assistance throughout the implementation process, On-going assistance is also available through an 800 number to our help desk In Louisville. (1 B. 4dtniniatrativt,Eoliciea and PrneMuffs I Ws have worked with the City's Personnel staff to develop procedural guidelines and practice standards to implement our recommendations for the new salary management program. We have reviewed this material and the approacheg explained in the manual. We are supportive of these practical guidelines and standards and believe they reflect a ! reasonable method to effectively monitor and manage the details of the new salary management program at the City, ' We mill be available to assist the City in developing any other policies and procedures guidelines to ensure the programs are administered fairly and equitably. MY or Nfiton s.tkry Noftwo"t rrotmm page 18 ' i WWI PROJECT SUMMARY (Continued) C. ~a ores 1 ' Wig have developed appeals procedures to be used during the implementation of this program. Mercer will be available to assist the City in the appeals process for the next year. Our recommendations for the appeals process are outlhied in Section ii of this report. D. PrgMM Orientation Upon acceptance of this program by City Council, Mercer will be available to assist in orienting supervisors and managers regarding the new salary administration prciVam, :S i r f city of oenton smaq Nmr Veomt Proom Page 19 i N7tN.LllLj~ i F r SECTION II Appeals Procedure i. l I f ~•!a. y.n. i..Irlln:-~-1)e1MPn G.:..Jn.r ~+v. YAr , a 1 , i APPEALS PROCEDURE 's job has been misclassifted can appeal the grade assignment and who believes that their job or a subordinate immediate ed Superr+ Director and Executive ( Any employee als must be forwarded up through the request a review of the position All apps appeal will be forward to Personnel for presentation Director. If the Executive Director believes a review is warranted, the to the Classification Review Committee. be comprised of three Directors, each with a minimum of three years of service selected by the City Manager. At the end of the firs in an year, the one of the member's will The Classification Review Committee will Committee. Each year with the City. TMe members will be who will serve a three year term. to be replaced by a new Director from a n eother department. The other two members will rc , The appeals thereafter, one of the members will P down and will be appeals roce replaced ss by and a new Director thereafter on a quarterly basis Committee will meet in August, 1991 for the initial apps p is outlined below: A ;,,tnttnn for Aapes when a osition s classification Is being appealed. The A new Position Responsibility Questius` be explained in detaildin an accompanying cover memo, reasons for the request for review m B. 5u i ► tp er t 1 i' The questionnaire and cover memo must be approved and signed by the Executive Director who will then forward both i to Personnel. page 2P 1 Ctty or oantun gamy M.nee+ueMt Prop'm i r,V.ae rir. APPEALS PROCEDURE (Continued) C. Eersonnel Actioq The Personnel Department will review each request by comparing the duties and responsibilities outlined in the new questionnaire with those in the existing Job Description to ascertain if the job has changed since it was last evaluated. The justifiration provided in the cover memo ftud other documentation will be reviewed to determine if some aspect of the job was initially overlooked. Responses in the new questionnaire will be entered into the CompMaster" system and the autocheck analysis will be performed to look for anomalies and inconsistencies. Superior, subordinate and peer positions will be identified by Personnel for comparison against the new responses. Market data will be gathered from the appropriate competitive labor market for the position. The Director of Personnel or a designated representative will present the analysis to the Classification Review Committee along with a recommended action. D. Committee Review ` The Committee will review the materiaL submitted by the Executive Director, the analysis conducted by Personnel and the Personnel Director's recommeudation. Based on this information, the Committee can (1) approve the appeal, (2) deny the appeal or (3) request additional information, The Committee is not authorized to approve the movement of any position more than one grade level without the City Manager's approval. I} City of Denton Salary Maeaerownt Program Page 21 f, rt , ..!v.wrrn~.,Far... l1Hr• sue rrrr. ...v... r My\UYIAf~Gfir1110h ya. l i ,4 ti$Yll 1 i APPEALS PROCEDURE (Continued) If the position being appealed is in the department of one of the Committee members, that Director will not be allowed to vote on the appeal. If the vote 1s split between the other two Committee members, the City Manager will make the final decision on the appeal. j E Communkatioa The results of the appeal will be forwarded to the Executive Director from the Director of Personnel for communication to the affected employees. F F. ft-Evaluations No position may be evaluated more than once a year. No Department may request more than 15%v of Its jobs be re-evaluated In any one fiscal year unless thn Department has gone through a total reorganization. All requests for appeal must be addressed by the Classification Review Committee within 0-pe months of when the request Is made. i j i pty of M"eon Ssiary Man"emmit Propa30 Page 22 r Pow" J,w add{ i. SECTION III N"At steps a" i PAOLI P , r_~-~ .."~..y r.~-may r-....ti i NEXT STEPS j Ile following items will be completed over the next month before final implementation in October. 1. Appoint an Appeals Committee. 2, Plan for and establish Manager and Supervisory training in the salary administration process, 3. Plan training activities and communication program for all employees. 4, Conduct appeals of classiflcetion and placement in proposed pay plan. 5, Review and establish appropriate titles and career paths. 6. Update current policies for City Council consideration after appropriate legal review, i , 7. Determine appropriate process for budgeting In future years, "E 8. Reconfigure the mainframe computer based on changes made to the salary administration process. 9. Finalize the administrwive procedures and processes, i l~ i E, a'tty of tkntun Mary mangement Proemm t Page 2.3 i i { l .u.,•_ a..w lw., a-ar.w. r.dxsl.. a...... . xaa.,zsuilWatYr.i1~•, 1 li -1 l i I f i I 1 3 EXHIBITS , S 3 4 a I_ i , A 1 Y I Employee Name: - - 1 position Title: r d Job Code Position Control Number: Book Number) 1 l rl City of Denton Position Responsibility Questionnetre ~~yy 6,! 1 I' 1 p kiIYAar 9 ~ + r I r i PURPOSE AND INSTRUCTIONS This questionnaire Is designed to gather facts about the duties and respon- j # slbllities of your job. Your answers, the responses from other employees In ~1 the job, and comments from your supervisor will be used as Input Into the ! evaluation of the jobs at the City of Denton. This form will also help us to 1 ' update our current understanding of the jobs which make up the City. Keep In mind this information will be used to help us better understand the duties and responsibilities of your job. The form is not an ovaluatlon of your performance on the job. r Please be thorough and accurate. When responding to the multiple choice questions, select the one response that best reflects your position. If you r have difficulty choosing between two responses, select one and write your concerns at the bottom of the page. Do not understate or lnflate your answers. Base your responses on the duties and responsibilities that are most typical of your job under normal conditions, not special projects or # temporary assignments. It might be helpful to Imagine you are explaining the requirements of your job to someone just hired to the position. J Only your supervisor and certain members of the Personnel staff will have access to your completed questionnaire. If you have any questions, pie" see the Personnel department. r`7 ~.J ` This questionnaire will be computer scored and computer validated. Hence, responses which appear Inconsistent will be reviewed in more detail to fully understand the reason for inconsistencies. Please be as accurate as pos f stbl®. I 1 1 I ~J e f 1 r i t y , i 1 GENERAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION Date: _ Your Name: Job Titie: - - - Department: j Division: Your Immediate supervisor's name and job title: Name: Title Your total length of service with the City: Your toted length•of service in current job: Years Months _ Years Months i Your current pay status (check one): ,J ❑ exempt (not eligible for overtime pay) ❑ nonexempt (eligible for overtime pay) { YOUR JOB SUMMARY- - Briefly describe the basic purpose of your job. What Is the overall goal of your job? E - j I ; Supervisor's Ir*W= t r t r' smm~uYl tl I i E YOUR BASIC JOB DU7yIES_ each state-' List the most significant duties currently performed on a regular basis. Start an action verb; for example, draw, build, distribute, write, plan, process, design, ment with other administer, etc. Indicate the Importance (in relationship toroYoriate numbetren) thedsppces ' uenc of each Rem you have listed by recording the app p provided (use the guide below) l C r NI'A m r Au i ee W t 4 t ( W 04 nJ air d. =V~?f I. T 'a 0~g ~ 6as~ ( ) t 4 s . t t ! v 1 4 eX , Exempie: Significance Frequency Duties 2 _2 t. Comgyare accounts payable Invol~ces_a aia nst . 3-- .,1 - - butles Significance Frequency 2 ~E ~ Supervisor's InitlalC~ ! 2 i ~ YOUR BASIC JAB DUTIES (continued) Duties Significance Frequency 3. 4. t i. 5 - 7. 10. 120 Supervltowe Inltlal~ 3 ( Y3sPN14q J7 ~ c9 ftP1~8tt{ i f j ORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS Please till In the chart below as it appIles to your job, Start with your job (third box from the top) complete the two levels above your job; then, on the left, others who also report to your supervisor, On the right list the jobs that report directly to you, Personnel Use Only j Next Highest Name Pos, Code: Management Level - ► lv. Code: Title j Capt. Code: Name Pos, Code: Immediate Supervisor Div, Code: Title Dept. Code: Name " Your Job Title ! Other Job Titles Reporting To Titles of Jobs Your Immediate Supervisor Reporting To You IL 4.i Supervisor's Inhisi 4 ? 2 ORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS (continued) List the logical promotional positions to which someone could be promoted from your position: Position Mile: (For Personnel Use Only) Position Code t , ~f List the positions within the City that could qualify a person to be prnmotsd to your posk ! ~ Lion: Position Tltk: (For Personnel Use Only) Position Code 1 rr, ~ .r Supervlsors ~nnl~ ~ . 1 I tts:W2t. i U tlf's%I t 0 + I. EDUCATION This question addresses the type and minimum level of formal education that Is required "i to be hired for your job. It does not address the type and level of educatlon you may describes he t which select betdif have evel lof education the box of the one r you n required. The answe orsthis qetstion may minimum um Went from your personal background, A. Education + ° 1 ( i Some education, but not a high school diploma. ❑ 2 High schn-,.)l diploma or equivalent. ❑ a High school diploma plus commercial, vocational, trade or technical train. Ing of 12 months or less, ❑ A High school diploma plus Grade "C" Certification. ❑ s High school diploma plus Grade "B" Certification, s High school diploma plus Grade "A" Certification 08 specialized or techni- cal knowledge requiring 2 years of formal training {Associates Degree). f 1 ❑ 7 Bachelor degree gained through a formal four year college program or spe- cla#ized technical training of equlvalen'. length (BA, BS), beyond the four year level 'i~ ❑ e Some specialized knowledge or certification (CPA). MS), area of specialization the equivalent formal work performed training (MBA, In 4~ ❑ s Masters y related to or directly ra ❑ io Doctoral degree or equivalent formal training In an area of specialization , directly related to the work performed (JD, PhD, MD). If your job has a specific certifloation, Ilcensure or registration requirement, please indicate, I ; Supervisor's Inhial LJ B + eaaxir~vp 1 F II r7 1 III. EXPERIENCE - Experience as used here means thae apre him or cto adequately perform the duties s of another organization which would p p your position in our organization. _ al educaon + Assume that a person has the minimuwhich m ievel of form indicates the least amount ofdwoark experience vlous question. Check the on at training riot to ant Into the ob that is needed to be hired for this job. A. prior Experisnce Less than 6 months. 134 3 years up to 5 years. a ❑ 2 6 months up to 1 year. a s 5 Yeas up to 8 years. s 1 year up to 3 years. How many y ❑ s 8 years or more. I A ears of experience did you have when you were hired or promoted Into your p , r ? osition in our organization !.Y! Assuming that a person has the minimum revel of formal education and. experience In the previous two questions, check ;he one box which indicates the least amount of on-the-job i tralning required after ant Iry nto the ob until the worker is producing independently, - a, On the Job Training/Experience ,t i Less than 6 months. ❑ + 3 years up to G years. f~ e 5 years up to 8 years. 2 6 months up to i year. Q a e years or more. ❑ a 1 year up to 3 years. How long did it take you to begin operating Independently when you were hired or promoted Into your position in our organization months, years? 1 i supervleot's 4nRIaI C,_„]` 7 K 4 ¢.,m,u j r, l Ill. SKILL REQUIREMENTS For each skill area, check the one statement which most correctly describes the most cif- l flcult skill level used In performing your job duties. As with education, the statement you select for your job may differ from your individual skill level In an area. y A. Speaking Skills ❑ , 1 do not need any special speaking skills to perform my job; most of my _.f speaking Is fairly routine In nature. ❑ 2 1 provide or obtain basic types of factual Information or explanations (such as Instructions or work orders). j ❑ a 1 provide explanations of technical or other complex matters to people with little or no background In the area under discussion, ❑ a 1 provide explanations on technical matters to people with experience or knowledge of the technical area. f 1 ❑ 5 1 provide comprehensive and concise explanations of technical or complex ; l matters to people at high levels within the City. } I B. Moth/Accounting Skills f ❑ i 1 use minimal math skills to perform my Job duties. ❑ 2 1 use basic arithmetic to perform simple calculations and/or make simple bookkeeping calculations, -1 U s I perform analyses Involving ratios, percentages and simple statistical j methods and/or make calculations to reconcile 11nancial statements and dc- counts. ❑ l io perform algebraic, im methods and/or apply level accounting methods for pply Y high financial reporting, ' ❑ s I apply research methods, algorithms, calculus or -idvanced statfstloW methods and/or apply advanced accounting methods to assess overall financial position. supdrvlsor's Inltlal y III. SKILL REOUIREMENTS (conflnued) For each skill area, check the one statement which most correctly describes the most dif- ficult skill level used In performIng your job duties. C. Physical Dexterity Skills 1 My job requires a few simple hand operations but little close or accurate timing. 2 My job requires some accuracy and Intermittent use of hand operaflons with some speed and accuracy. 3 My job requires moderate dexterity with ordinary speed and accuracy for most of the day. 4 My job requires a high level of dexterity and coordination to manipulate machinei or high volumes of material In short time spans with rapid coor- dInatIon o~ movements, s My job requires extensive and highly skilled eye-hand coordination using precise and complicated operations over major portions of the work period with high ac-.uracy. 0. Problem Solving Skills i Problems are genorally solved by my supervisor. 02 Problems are genorally easy to Identify; solutions are defined by policy with required action specifically defined. Problems are apparent but precise Identification may require further prob- Ing, Inquiry or research; solutions are based on standard operating procedures or well-established past precedent, 4 Probl,4ms are not readily apparent and symptoms may be vague; facts may be Incomplete and require further Inquiry; solutions require Interpreta- tIon of information and some Independent judgment. a Problems are difficult to Identity and facts may be insufficient or mislead- Ing; extensi, ' Inqu)ry/researoh may be necessary and soluflons. require Integration of Information and considerable Independent Ju4ment. Supervisor's Initial , i I f1 III. SKILL (REQUIREMENTS (continued) Check the one statement which most correctly describes the most difficult skill level used In performing your job duties. E. Public Or Citizens Interpersonal Skills ❑ My job requires limited contact with the public ❑ 2 My job requires the exchange of routine information of a non-controversial ( A nature. ❑ a My job requires the exchange of non-routine Information which may be slightly controverelat at times. ❑ 4 My job requires me to provide advice; It may require me to use per- suasion techniques to order to Influence the public toward some action. i ❑ s My job requires me to negotiate In order to reach an agreement or solu- tion. ; G) s My job requires me to represent the City In public speaking forums, i :_j i ` Supervleor's Innial 3 is l C ~ tom:.:, t I i ~ i . I IV. LOCAL GOVERNMENT SKILLS This question measures the breadth of local government skills needed to perform the job successfully, Check the one statement which most correctly describes the most difficult skill level required, A. Looai Government Skills ❑ i My job requires limited knowledge of other departments within the City. 1 ❑ 2 My job requires some knowledge of a tow departments In the City, such as accounting procedures, personnel policies, or data processing C guidelines. ❑ 3 My job requires some knowledge of most departments In the City. My job r requires regular Interaction with most departments Involving exchange and receipt of Information, ❑ 4 My job requires extensive knowledge of several departments In the City, a My job requires providing advice to these departments on specific problems or general policies, ❑ s My job requires extensive knowledge of most departments in the City, My job requires participation In the establishment of policies which directly of fact the operations of most departments. ~i ,I Supervisor's IMIRI ~.1 t € ~ 11 _ E Y.. f I V. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS ti Check the one statement In each box which most correctly describes the most difficult j technical level normally required In performing your job duties, 1t ` A. Level of Technical Skills 1 ❑ i My job requires relatively limited use of technical skills. ❑ 2 My job requires minor technical skills such as reading gauges, Inputting data into computers, bookkeeping entries etc. ❑ a My job requires moderate technical skills such as utilizing formulas, charts and schedules, maintaining and understanding technical records, coding and testing computer programs etc, ❑ 4 My job requires complex technical skills such as utilizing complicated en- glneering diagrams, blueprints, and surveyed documents, utilizing f precision measuring equipment, designing, coding and testing complex computer applications, documenting government regulations, etc, ❑ a My job requires highly complex technical skills such as utilizing very com- plicated drawings and specifications, applying higher mathematics In the application of advanced mechanical, electrical or other engineering applica- tions, developing highly complex computer applications (I.e. mainframe), Utilizing testing and research procedures for analyzing data, etc. i` B. Breadth of Technical Skills r ❑'i My job requires limited technical skills. ❑ 2 My job requires technical skills which are focused In one aspect of a major technical field; generally, my job requires providing technical Informa- tion to others In my field. ❑ 3 My job requires technical skills covering several aspects of a major technl- cal field; generally, my job requires providing technical information and solving technical problems, `t ❑ 4 My job requires technical skills covering multiple aspects of a major techni- cal, field; my job requires solving technical problems and providing advice and recommendations on technical Issues within my technical field. ❑ s My job requires technical skills in more than one technical field; my job functions as the technical export or "trouble shooter" for one major technl- oal field; my job requires providing advice to others in and out of my technical field, supervisor's Initial= l 12 ~1 t r t VI. ORIGINALITY AND CREATIVITY j Listed below are statements describing your opportunities to Introduce new and different Ideas and solutions. Check the one statement in each box which best describes the originality and creativity required In your job, A. Originality and Creativity ❑ i I perform tasks or other activities which require limited amounts of originality or creativity, s ❑ 2 1 must apply original thinking to determine the solution to problems, I ❑ a 1 create new products, programs or processes, or I develop/refine con- cepts or theories discovered by others. ❑ 4 1 create original concepts or theories that advance knowledge in a teohnl- j cal or professional field and that can be used to develop new products, programs and/or expand City services. B. Significance Level ❑ i Originality Is a very minor part of the job, ❑ 2 Originality Is of secondary significance or a minor aspect of the job, `i ❑ 9 Originality Is a significant part of the job but not Its major aspect. i ❑ 4 Originality Is a significant part of the job and one of Its major aspects, ❑ e Originality Is a highly significant part of the job and Its major aspect. J i J Supervisor's Initial ' i ry i f Y j l Ylll DECISION MAKING This section of the questionnaire mdeals ake dechsithe impact of your ons as well as the impact l of t twhi i terms ch best s ' of the authority that you have to on other employees and the public, Check the box for the one statement isions and commitments, I the authority that your lob has In making deceither alone or with others, I A. Authority a , 1 follow specific Instructions to perform my job. f ❑ x 1 follow instructions, but sometimes I choose which approach to use. ❑ a 1 make decisions or recommendations within the limits of geue68tl'Instruc- tions which have been provided (e.g., accept or reject a request): Instructions are clear and do not r irwhlch~requlrle some interpretation of " 1 make decisions or recommendations rutestprocedures; more difficult decisions are always referred to higher levels, f, decisions nature In ay ordance I make decisions and recommendattonose of difficult a broad with general policy and guidelines, referred to higher levels for their opinion with responsibility for final ❑ e i consult with others on very difficult 1 am required to provide input on decisions/recommendations; frequently _i potloy decistons of a major Impact. ap roval onbWI policy making 7 1 provide leadership to others and have ultimate ❑ final decisions; I am required to provide ture othee City. decisions which guide the long-range .a -7 Provide one or two specific examples of decisions that you make In the course of complet- ~ Ing your typical Job duties, { I J ~ Super leor's InHial 1 f4 , 1 t i I ! I VII. DECISION MAKING (continued) Based on the authority to make decisions which you identified In Part A, Indicate the likely scope of Impact your decisions typically have. Check the one statement which beat describes the Impact of the position based on the decisions made. ' B. Impact of Decisions ❑ i My decisions Impact the people I work closely with. ❑ 2 My decisions impact the day to day activities of a small division or work unit (1.10 employees). a 1 have responsibility tar making decisions which typically affect a large division (more than 10 employees). ❑ a 1 have responsibility for making decisions and final recommendations which typically affect an entire department. 6 1 have responsibility for making final decisions and final recommendations which often affect more than one department and sometimes the entire city, ❑ s My decisions have a major Impact and generally guide or Influence City direction. f' Specifically identify the units that are affected by your decisions: I~ Supervisor's InKlol= 15 + I 1 VIII. COMPLEXITY This section of the questionnaire addresses the complexity of the tasks and duties you typically perform in your job. Check the one statement which blast describes the com- plexity of your job in terms of the jud~,nant you must exercise. Dealings with the public should be considered when responding to this question. I h A. Judgment ❑ 1 My work duties are well-defined with clearly stated directions/standards. ❑ 4 My work may Involve occasional non-routine assignments which require new approaches or independent Judgment be used. ~w~ ❑ a My work consists of moderately complicated procedures and tasks which require Independent judgment such as setting task priorities, evaluating results and coordinating with others. , 3 ❑ 4 My work is substantially complex and varied; It requires the selection and i application of technical/detailed guidelines; strong analytic ability and Inde- pendent judgment are needed to Identify, test, select and apply appropriate procedures or approaches. ❑ 5 My work Is highly complex and requires the application of skills which are ; not governed by guidelines; It requires a complete knowledge of opera- f` tlons and practices. ' Provide one or two examples of dutlea that Indicate the level of complexity that is typical In your job. ,,3t I _ i Supervisor's Initial 16 ~3 t 4.1 VIII. COMPLEXITY (continued) I Check the one statement which best describes the flexibility you have in performing your work activities. I B. Flexibility 1 ❑ i I work under close supervision; my actions are specified and directed by my supervisor or by procedure; my supervisor assigns and reviews my work. ❑ 2 1 work under roL1tlne supervision; my work Is performed under general guidelines, procedures and rules; my supervisor occasionally reviews work to ensure completion, ❑ s 1 work under moderate supervision; my objectives or goals are established _ In advance, but I have flexibility In the course of action taken to se- " compiish those goals, ❑ 4 1 work under general direction; I function under very broad goals and es- tablished policies. ❑ s I set virtually all goals and ,direction, and establish City policy, Provide one or two examples where your job requires flexibility or changes in job routine, 41 lk~ _J j ; i f Supervisor's Initial f 17 a 1qW t i IX. BUDGETING/PLANNING This question deals with your position's responsibilities, If any, In relation to an annual operating budget as well as the amount of planni--g you are required to do in completing your job duties. Check the ooe statement that bast describes the level of financlal/ budgetary responsibilities of your job. 1. . , A. Budgeting s I am responsible for letting my supervisor know what Items I need so they I can be Included In the budget. I ❑ 2 1 am responsible for ensuring that budget Information Is accurately recorded. s,~ ❑ a 1 am responsible for advising and making recommendations on budget ; ` items. ❑ 4 1 am responsible for monitoring a budget but not for developing or allocat. ing a budget. ❑ s I am responsible for developing, allocating and monitoring a budget fora work unit or small division (1-10 employees). e I am responsible for developing, allocating and monitoring a budget for a large division (more than 10 employees). 7 1 am responsible for ,;eveloping, allocating and monitoring budgets affect- ing an entire departwent. ! Q e I am responsible for approving all budgets for the City. If you checked a box with an asterisk next to It, provide an approximate dollar amount ` wl of your budgetary responsibility; $ ~J .di Supervla0r'a InMlal 1 W.~ 18 l; IX. BUDGETINGIPLANNING (continued) farming your the planning that Is generally required in per, one statement 1ha1 best describes Check the our job duties. 'x a. Planning late my job responsibilities. I ❑ I plan my own work In order to comp ❑ 2 I schedule others' work to meet regolrements such as delivery schedules, service demands, timetables, deadlines or other targets. Q 3 1 develop objectives for using a work unit's resources, with guidance from I the overall organizational planning process, I develop plans and broad objectives for using several work unit's resour- ces to meet major City goals. s I develop department strategy that Integrates plans of several major divisions to achieve the City's goals. r 1 s I develop plans, objectives and strategies for achieving short and long- ; range goals for the City. If you checked a box with an asterisk next to it, indicate the work unit(s) for which you assume planning responsibility, ~-J r Supervisor's initial t.-1 19 f y X. CONTACTS This section addresses the frequency and purpose of contacts that are made with persons i Inside or outside the City, These are contacts that are essential to perform your Job duties, not contacts or communications snemployees ofn he ~mly City. Insideucothe day. ntacts Outside any that occur ra w contacts Include anyone wh emptoyes who is not in your division. Check the one statement in each box which best reflects the level of contact made in per- 1 -i forming your job. A. Autside Contacts - Frequency .,1 [:3 1 Outside contacts are required once a month or less, ❑ 2 Outside contacts are required 2 or 3 times a month. ❑ 3 Outside contacts are required 2 or 3 times a week. Q A Outside contacts are required every day, s outside contacts are required several times a day. e B. Outside CaMaots - Purpose ❑ i Outside contacts Invoive receiving and giving information and ray bonding tc questions. f~ z Outside contacts Involve explaining, Instructing or coordinating, ❑ 3 Outside contacts Involve selling, advising or consuitinq. I ❑ 4 Outside contacts involve negotiating and Influencing, LJ SWirvlsor's Initial ~J 20 t. I X, CONTACTS (continued)_ - i C. Inside Contacts ❑ I My job requires minimal contact with other, dlvistcn7ad l M ob requires obtaining or gluing lniormation to eD - divlslans. ob requires explaining, Instructing or coordinat1 employees outside of my division. 3 My j D 4 My job requires explaining Information and/or provivisors/Superintendents outside of my division. rvlsons/5uperlnten- ❑ a My job requires negotiating with and InfluencingSupe dents outside of my division. advice to Directors ❑ a My job requires onln{n information and/or providing outside of my division, ❑ r My job requires negotiating with and Influencing Directors outside of my division. I My job requires explaining and advising to Executive Directors and/or the i ❑ e r City Manager, My lob requires negotiating with and Influencing Executive Directors and/or the City Manager. n t Supervisor's Irglial 21 VAL t f}- tw . 1 V XI. WORK ENVIRONMENT - 77 This section addresses the types of working conditions and resulting physical effort re- i qulred in the completion of your job duties as well as your exposure to or risk of accidents. For each statement listed below, and using the thprovided, e listed conditions. ` ber which best describes the frequency to which you en (1 ' y F' y a E+ 2r~r a t 4 ryw KG N S:: k r Y. o °S.r L 3", ~`r r S F 3 } x yh HH f A. Working Conditions Fraquenoy 123456 1. Extreme temperatures or humidity • r r.; 1 2 3 4 5 6 2. Poor ventilation ,.........••..rr....r..r..' ~ f y. g adore or )............r 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 6 6 3, sickening sights .~~~r ' ' r....... 1 5 6 4. Excessive noise or vibration from machinery 1 2 3 4 5 6 j 5. Cramped working quarters . . r . ` 6. Unusual levels of dirt or dust ........................1 2 3 4 5 6 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7, Long, uninterrupted periods of sitting/standing r • r . i 2 3 4 b 6 6. Extensive roquirement for walking 5 6 9, Stooping, kneeling, crouching, crawling or climbing ' ' r r . 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 6 } 10. Confined to work station for long periods of time , ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 11. Irregular breaks r r , 11 12. Irregular work days/hours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . 1 2 3 4 5 6 _l 13, Required shift work 1 2 3 4 5 6 I 14. Smoke, fumes and vapors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 3 4 5 S 15, Paint spray and/or paint fumes 1 2 3 4 5 6 16. Work on elevated surfaces (higher than head level) . , 1 2 3 4 6 6 Supervisor's Inhiai= 22 f 4~ l XI. WORK ENVIRONMENT (continued) enc scale provided, circle the num- below, and usingthe irequ Y to which you encounter the listed canditlons For each to which YOU 0 bar whichsbest descrlibes he frequency /4 P i h , iu P94 y \ 4 ' ~s t a` 'r a F Y'v o. 1 ''C T Y~ lgg z nu : e r a r prequencY 123456 ; j 1, Required to change work location ; . 11 1 2 3 45 123466 2, inflexible deadlines ' . ' rtunitles for breaks , . 3, intense concentration with few oppo 1 2 3 4 6 6 , 123458 4, prolonged use of video display terminals . Extremely high volumes of work 1 2 3 4 6 6 5, . . . . . , 1 2 3 4 6 6 6. Repetitive work . , . 1 7, Climbing or reaching overhead . ' ' ' to .10..pounds ► . . 2 3 4 5 6 g, Lifting, pulling or pushing weights of up 1 2 3 4 5 6 idling or pushing weights of 11.26 pounds 1 2 3 4 6 6 g, Luting' p weights or 25 to over 50 pounds lo, Lifting, pulling or Puns wizens or gernployeesj conflict is i 2 3 4 5 6 intense (e.g., abusive olt 1 2 3 4 6 6 1 12, Exposure to sNuations requiring split second decisions . Supervlsor's ItdtW L 23 S. Z y i l XI1 WORK ENVIRONMENT (continued) Check the one statement that best describes the type of accident and exposure to risk ' that normally occurs in your job in spite of normal safety precautions. ❑ I I am nety hazard s while performing my job duties, 7osedk C, Hazards ❑ x 1 am et could result In accidents of a minor nature ]hh would ff. l❑ a I am exposed to risk that could result in accidents or Injuries which c3 ..1 result in lost time, Q 4 1 am exposed to risk that could result In accidents or Injuries which cj result in lost time; there Is a moderate possibility of an Incapacitating dent, a 1 am ex posed to risk that could result In an Incapacitating accident, there Is a possibility of a fatal accident. I~ It you checked a box with an asterisk O next to It, Indicate the types of accidents and In- juries that you are exposed to In performing your jab duties. l I gupsrvlsor's InRlal= 24 i 1 f,'t.St4Yl~ Stl_`CRSi' MMM F XII. DIRECTION OF OTHERS E This question appraises the extent of responsibility for the organization, selection, assign- ment, guidance, review of personnel, and the performance of other related supervisory or management tasks. Only the formal assignment of such responsibility to your position should be considered. Informal work relationships, Including periodic or temporary assign- ment based upon the skills of a particular employee, should not be considered. Regular I a direction of contract employees should be considered. Check the one box which most correctly defines the number of employees under the direot and Indirect supervision of your job (Le., all employees reporting directly to your position as well as employees indirectly reporting to your position). A. Supervision ❑ 0 ❑ s 21 35 2 1-2 ❑7 36-49 ❑3 3-5 ❑e 50-99 ❑4 6-10 ❑0 100-149 E ❑ s 11 - 20 ❑ io 160 or more 7 i i, Supervisor's lnitlal= t 25 i 1 I I X11. DIRECTION OF OTHERS (continued) l Check one statement whlch best describes the nature of the wdrk supervised. B. Type of Work Supervised ❑ 1 My job does not require me to supervise others. ' ❑ 2 1 act in a "lead" or "senior" capacity over other positions performing essen- dally the same work. i ] s 1 supervise highly standardized, routine adminlstraiive activities for one _ work unit or small division (1-10 employeec). ad- ❑ The work I supervise is o work unittor small divisonInvolves (1 10 emp oiyees) mInIstratIve duties for one ❑ a'i supervise technically oriented or complex activities for one work unit or small division (1.10 employees), us 1 supervise technically oriented or complex activities for a large divisloii (more than 10 employees). • ❑ 1 supervise diversified and highly complex activities for an entire depart ment. ❑ s I supervise highly diverse and complex activities for multiple departments. ❑ o I supervise all major functions of the City. 1 C i {I supervisors initial 1 20 } T i ~ii14, tk7rlSiV t S E YOUR COMMENTS This portion of the questionnaire provides you with the opportunity to make any additional comments you might have about your job or this questionnaire, Also, please make notes about any particular question that you found difficult to answer or about any specific part of your job which was not covered by the factors I - XII. f { ~J ' j , Employee's signature Date i iJ 27 4 i~ i SUPERVISOR'S COMMENT SECTION (This portion of the questionnaire is to be completed by your immediate supervisor.) As a supervisor, It Is important that you review this questionnaire and Identify any dis- !1 orepancies between the Incumbent's responses and your own knowledge of the )ob. i Remember, this questionnaire Is Intendad solely for the purpose of accurately describing the job and not the person or his/her performance. if you feel a response or statement contained In this questionnaire should be changed, 1 please do so on the appropriate page and place your Initials next to your recommended -j change, Please place your initials at the bottom of each page after you have reviewed that page. The space below is provided for your general comments, t I' i i ~I - I 1 have reviewed the contents of this questionnalre and confirm that with my suggested j changes (if any), It is an accurate and complete representation of the job, Supervisor's signature Date JI { 28 i u t Exhibit B * City of Denton Weighting of Compensable Factors j Compensable Factor Weighting Education 9% Experience 9% j Skills 6% 4$ a Local Government Skills Technical Requirements 10% originality/Creativity 8% Decision Making 12% j .E Complexity 12% k Budgeting/Planning lot Contacts 5$ Work Environment 5$ i Direction of Others 9$ 4 t i t z Exhibit C Page: 1 * city of Denton Market Analysis l ! Denton Harket Denton/ OCO Job Title Avg Pay Avg Pay Market Code ----I-- 34,576 SUPV PARKS 270288 127% MB4B40 0 LIBRARIAN II 320286 26,508 122% AB10 LABORER - GRNDSKEEPR 15,456 13,412 119$ DG95 ASST CITY ATTY I 390250 33,084 119% CB15 COMPUTER OPERATOR 20,706 17,580 118% AE30 LIGHT EQUIPMENT OPER l8r466 24,371 117% CE25 ELECTRONIC TECHN GA24 LABORER TEMPORARY 13,042 11143.3 114% DF70 ENG ASSOC I - ELEC 31,179 27,337 114% DJ30 ASST TO THE CITY MGR 50,045 45,288 1114 30,441 27,548 1114 DD40 ACCOUNTANT CC60 WW TREAT SHFT OPR II 241638 220345 1104 AA10 CUSTODIAN 15,101 13,718 110% CA20 SHIFT OPERATOR APPR 18,408 16,983 108% MG20 SUPT LEISURE SERV 510418 47,449 108$ BE10 ACCOUNTING CLERK 170613 16,274 1084 M845 SUFV VEHICLE MAINT 28,330 260196 1084 MF10 SUPT PARKS MAINT 51,314 48,036 1074 MB30 sUPV FIELD SERVICES 310158 29,517 1064 CD30 ENG TECH II 26,058 240733 1054 JA40 DIR LIBRARY 66,456 63,128 1054 ME70 SUPT BUILDING OPER 44,221 42,295 1054 CD20 CODE ENFORCE OFFICER 27,040 250913 1044. BC10 CLERK TYPIST 14,643 140100 1044 { BE60 WAREHOUSE/PARTS CLK 18,658 18,009 1044 AG10 CIVILIAN JAILER 20,010 190411 1034 CC10 BOILER FIREMAN 23,046 220464 1034 CC35 VEHICLE MECIMIC II 23,797 23,207 10102% I 46j234 1 34 MF30 PURCHASING AGENT 47, F SERV 33e754 33$051 102% DE10 AC OUNTANTIELSENIOR 320843 320298 1024 c I 1 AG'is:`:>Y~A is wsyy:;Ffiy Exhibit C (Continued) Page: 2 * City of Denton Market Analysis j Denton Market Denton/ Oca ! Code Job Title Avg pay Avg Pay Market- 17,118 - 17 389 17,118 102$ BD50 DUPL-PRINTER/OPER 37 939 370440 101$ DG60 PLANNER - SENIOR j AN10 HEAVY EQUIPMENT OPER 22,520 220312 10]$ DC30 HORTICULTURIST 291806 29,557 101$ CD91 BUYER 23,483 23,394 100$ CE10 INSPECTOR -BUILDING 300410 30,441 100$ C845 LINEMAN APPR II 20,203 20,3676 99$ ME80 SUPT ELEC DIET 51,147 51, 71 i BE81 WORD PROCESSING OPER 160590 16,779 994 DI20 ASST CITY ATTY II 41,434 42,420 984 CD25 ELECTRICIAN 26,445 27,102 984 CB55 WELDER 22,214 22,911 97% MB25 SUPV WATER PROD OPER 33,280 340337 974 JA45 IR PARKS & REC 660394 68,657 97% D MF20 BUILDING OFFICIAL 510314 53,113 97$ CD55 TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECH 240571 25,607 96$ CB50 MAINT MECH II 19,868 20,746 96$ FE10 LIFEGUARD 100109 10$71 96$ M865 PORE ELECTRIC DIST 38,022 390840 95$ BC60 SWTCHBRD OPER/RECEPT 14,737 15,506 95$ JA30 DIR INFO SERVICES 640626 68,103 95$ AC50 MAINT WRKR-BLDG/GRND 19,075 190101 DG91 PROG ANALYST III 40,321 42,802 944 JA25 EXEC DIR FINANCE 720654 77,391 94$ JA15 DEF CITY MGR/EX DIR 820243 87,676 94$ D092 BUDGET ANALYST 34,112 36,693 93$ CH10 AUXILIARY EQUIP OPER 19,294 20,906 92$ BN10 DISPATCHER ^ PUB SAF 20,715 220458 924 30 41o 33,005 92% CE30 ELECTRICIAN - LEAD 4 6 488 50,561 924 ME60 SUPT FLEETS I 1 Exhibit C (Continued) Page: 3 * City of Denton Market Analysis e f 000 Denton Market Denton/ - Code Job Title----- Avg Pay Avg Pay Market --_-W- i 4 DE20 PROG X4ALYST II 31,450 34,270 924 ME40 SUPT SOLID WASTE 44,158 48,206 924 MA30 SUPV W REHOUSE 24,128 26,424 914 MF50 FIRE MAPSHALL 45,677 50,028 914 I DC25 REC CENTR SUPV 27,743 30,432 914 JABS EXEC DIR UTILITIES 82,243 900507 914 F JA14 EX DIR MUTE SER/ECON 710656 790150 914 JA35 EXEC DIR P1jAN & DEV 62,254 68,792 904 CC15 COMPUTER OPRR - LEAD 24,918 270722 90# JA82 DIR ELECTRIC UTIL 67,413 75,614 894 DE90 URBAN PLANNEK 280407 32,090 89# JA80 DIR ENVIRON 01:RR 53,373 60,339 884 CD40 LINEMAN 25,954 29,372 88# CD96 ELECTRIC METER TECH 27,851 31,570 884 BESS MUNICXPL COURT CLERK 16,630 180986 884 MD20 SUPV TRAFFIC 320427 37,328 874 f CE35 LINEMAN - LEAD 30,410 35,112 87# s FN10 POOL MANAGER 130125 15,196 864 JA60 DIR COMMUNITY SERV 551598 64,748 86# AC30 METER READER 15,625 18,262 864 JA95 DIR "IAMB & ENG 54,933 64,771 85# CE69 SANITARIAN 270664 32,627 85# AE10 ANIMAL CONTROL OFFCR 17,457 200690 84# OG20 SR SECRETARY 190918 23,739 844 BE20 PERSONNEL REP 160078 19,223 84# FC10 GROUNDSKEEPER II 90402 110244 844 DJ20 ASST CITY ATTY - SR 52,312 62,596 844 ` AE40 RESID3NTIAL DRIVER 17,368 20,831 834 yj CC94 PLANNING TECHNICIAN 20,145 24,163 834 ! DF80 FINANCIAL ANALYST 28,954 34,763 834 i; JA16 bIR PERSONNEL 56,971 68,576 834 p 1 ,r Exhibit C (Continued) Page: 4 * City of Denton Market Analysis f j y Occ Denton Market Denton/ Code Job Title Avg Pay Avg Pay market DH40 ENGINEER 40,254 48,522 634 DB20 RECREATION SPEC I 21,653 26,191 83% 1 ME50 SUPT STREETS 42,432 510863 824 JA75 POLICE CHIEF 62,858 760987 824 DH60 TREASURER 39,645 48,599 824 BI10 SECY - EXECUTIVE 22,223 270281 814 CE55 ENGINEERING TECH-SR 25,418 310439 814 FM10 ADMIN INTERN 12,416 15,446 804 JA83 DIR WATER OPER & ENG 53,373 66,686 804 DE60 PERSONNEL SPECIALIST 27,633 350381 784 BE40 CUST SVC REP 16,702 21,495 784 CA40 RECREATION LEADER 16,349 21,043 784 FF20 PLAYGROUND LEADER 100263 13,472 764 JA70 FIRE CHIEF 56,014 73,586 764 DCIO ADMINISTRATIVE ASST 22,799 30,087 764 DC40 PERSONNEL GENERALIST 20 I76 26p878 75 r 4 DI30 CONTROLLER 40,789 $50097 744 MAIO SUPV STREETS 26,187 35,612 744 BA30 DISPATCHER - UTILITY 13,406 180604 724 CB30 FIRE INSPECTOR 22,214 31,279 714 FB20 GROUNDSKEEPER I 90160 120931 71; FB10 SCHOOL CROSS GUARD 90194 13,098 704 DG90 RISK MANAGER 33,634 49,887 674 D031 ENG ASSOC II - CIVIL 0 35,813 04 i AC70 ANIMAL CARE ATTENDNT 0 15,854 04 r . i k FAhibit D * City of Denton Sources of Competitive Data Name_Of-City-ar organization City of Arlington city of Austin City of Bryan City of Carrollton ' City of Dallas city of Farmers Branch City of Fort worth city of Garland City of Grand Prairie City of Greenville City of Hurst City oof Irving City ille f Lewisv City Of Lubbock City city of Plano City of Richardson company C nel Assoc. Survey - Denton Person company C -Denton Personnel ASSOC* Survey Company K -Denton Personnel Assoc, survey company BB - Denton Personnel Assoc. Survey county of Denton ties Dallas water UCooie rative Electric Denton County p i Denton Personnel Association Denton State School J'osten's Moore Business Forms sally Beauty Company € Texas Municipal League i Texas Women's University Trinity River Authority ? University of North Texas ; y~yglrrkTxr~r. ~~d._ F.,w. i "OAK, t r,t ~ •ys , 4 . ire se*t ~ en1 i r~ wl NW9 r ~ r. 1+~ wwll Exhibit E * City of Denton y Proposed Salary Structure (Excluding Executive, Police, Fire, Seasonal, Temporary) Prop, Proposed Proposed Propose) Grd# Minimum Midpoint maximum 1 $11,361 $14,200 $170039 2 $12,723 $150904 $190084 3 $14,250 $17,813 $21,374 { 4 $15,960 $19,949 $23,941 5 $17,876 $22,343 $260813 6 $200020 $25,024 $300031 7 $220422 $28,028 $33,634 8 $25,114 $31,391 $37,671 9 $28,128 $35,158 $42,191 10 $31,502 $39,379 $47f253 11 $35,283 $44,102 $52,924 12 $390516 $49,396 $590274 13 $440258 $55,324 $66,387 I f r. r. _ r . btwxa~ 4 Exhibit F Pages 1 * City of Denton Proposed Grade Assignments (Excluding Executives, Police, Fire, Seasonal, Temporary) Prop Proposed Proposed Proposed Oco Grd# Minimum Midpoint Maximum Code Job Title - ----I--- 1 1 11 361 14 200 17 039 BC10 CLERK TYPIST 1 11,361 14,200 17,039 AA10 CUSTODIAN 1 11,361 140200 17,039 BA20 LIBRARY PAGE 1 11,361 14,200 17,039 BC60 SWTCHBRD OPER/RECEPT 2 12,723 15,904 190084 AC70 ANIMAL CARE ATTENDNT 2 12,723 15,904 19,084 AB10 LABORER - GRNDSKEEPR 2 12,723 35,904 19,084 AB30 LABORER - SANITATION 2 12,723 15,904 19,084 AA20 LABORER LANDFILL 2 12,723 150904 190084 BC30 LIBRARY CLERK 2 120723 150904 19,084 AC20 MAINT WORKER 2 120723 150904 19,084 AD10 MAINT WORKER TRAFFIC 2 12,723 15,904 19,084 AC50 MAINT WRKR-BLDG/GRND 2 12,723 15,904 19,084 AD30 PARKING ENFORCE OFCR 2 12,723 15,904 19,084 BA40 PUPPETEER 3 14,250 170813 21,374 BE10 ACCOUNTING CLERK 3 14,251 17,813 21,374 BD20 CASHIER 3 14,250 170813 210374 AF10 COMMERCIAL DRIVER 3 14,250 170813 21,374 BA30 DISPATCHER - UTILITY 3 140250 170813 21,374 BD50 DUPL-PRINTER/OPER 3 14,250 17,613 21,374 BE87 INFO PROCESSOR 3 14,250 17,813 21,374 CA50 LABORATORY ASSISTANT 3 14,250 17,813 21,374 BD21 LANDFILL CASHIER 3 140250 17,813 21,374 AE30 LIGHT EQUIPMENT OPER 3 140250 17,813 21,374 AC10 MAINT MECH 3 14,250 17,813 21,374 CB94 MAINT'TECH APPR 3 140250 170813 21,374 AC30 METER READER 3 14,250 17,813 21,374 BD70 METER SHOP CLERK 3 14,250 17,813 21,374 BE88 MUNICIPL COURT CLERK 3 14,250 17,813 21,374 AE40 RESIDENTIAL DRIVER i Exhibit F (Continued) Page: 2 + City of Denton Proposed Grade Assignments' (Excluding Executives, Police, Fire, Seasonal, Temporary) Prop ProposaA Proposed Proposed Oco - Grd# Minimum Midpoint Maximum Code ----wJob Title 3 14,250 17,813 23.374 CA20 SHIFT OPERATOR APPR 3 14,250 17,813 21,,'1 AF20 SHUPAK DRIVER 3 14,250 17,813 21,374 BE60 WAREHOUSE/PARTS CLK E 3 14,250 17,813 21,374 AC60 WARE(1SE/PARTSRM ATTD 3 14,250 17,813 21,374 BE81 i'Y-:RD PROCESSING OPER 4 15,960 190949 230941 CB10 AUXILIARY EQUIP OPER 4 15,960 19,949 230941 BE70 CASHIER - LEAD -l 4 150960 19,949 230941 AE80 CHIEF ME%1SR READER 4 15,960 19,949 230941 AG10 CIVILIAN JAILER 4 150960 19,949 230941 CB15 COMPUTER OPERATOR 4 15,960 19,949 230941 BE40 CUST SVC REP 4 150960 19,949 23,941 CB91 ELEC METER TECH APPR 4 151960 19,949 230941 BD60 LIBRARY TECH ASST 4 15,960 190949 23,941 CA10 LINEMAN APPR I 4 15,960 19,949 230941 CC90 MACHINIST/FABRICATOR 4 150960 19,949 23,941 CB50 MAINT MECH II 4 15,960 19,949 23,941 CB51 MNT MECH XI SOLID WS 4 150960 19,949 23,941 AE20 PARKS LEADPERSON 4 150960 19,949 23,941 BF20 PARTSROOM LEADPERSON 4 15,960 19,949 23,941 BE20 PERSONNEL REP 4 15,960 19,949 23,941 CC50 PNEUMTC INSTR TCH AP 4 15,960 19,949 23,941 BE80 SECRETARY 4 15,960 19i949 23,941 BF40 SECY-CRIMINAL INVEST 4 15,960 i9,949 230941 BE85 SECY-STAT SERVICES 4 15,960 19,949 230941 BE86 TAX CLERK 4 150960 19,949 23,941 AE50 UTILIT7 SERV WORKER 4 150960 190949 23,941 AE60 WTR MTR REPAIR PERS 5 17,876 22,343 26,813 BG30 LCCTG CLERK SUPV j 5 170876 220343 26,813 A910 ANIMAL CONTROL OFFCR 1# Exhibit F (Continued) Page: 3 * City of Denton Proposed Grade Assignments (Excluding Executives, Police, Fire, Seasonal, Temporary) i Prop Proposed Proposed Proposed Occ Grdii Minimum Midpoint Maximum Code Job Title 5 170876 22,343 26,813 CD65 CONSTRUCTION COORD 5 170876 22,343 26,813 BH10 DISPATCHER - PUB SAF f 5 17,876 22,343 26,813 CB20 ELECTRICIAN APPR 5 17,876 22,343 260813 CC92 ELECTRONIC TECH APPR 5 17,876 22,343 260813 CB25 ENO TECH I 5 17,876 220343 26,813 CC55 ENGINEERING AIDE-SR 5 17,876 220343 26,813 CE93 GRAPHIC SIGN TECH 5 17,876 220343 26,813 AH10 HEAVY EQUIPMENT OPER 5 17,876 22j343 26,813 BF10 LIBRARY 26,813 CB45 LINEMAN APPRSIZNT { 5 17, 876. 22, cC21 METER INFO TECH 5 17,876 220343 26,813 5 17,876 22,343 26,813 CA40 RECREATION LEADER 5 17,876 22,343 26,813 BG20 SR SECRETARY 5 170876 220343 260813 CC35 VEHICLE MECHANIC II 5 17x876 22,343 26,813 CB55 WELDER 5 170876 220343 260813 CB16 W SHIFT OPERATOR I 6 200020 25,024 30,031 BH20 ADMIN SECRETARY 6 20,020 25,024 300031 DC10 ADMINISTRATIVE ASST 6 200020 250024 30,031 CD15 ASST TO BLDG OFFICIA 6 20,020 250024 300031 CC10 BOILER FIREMAN 6 20,020 25,024 300031 CD90 BUILDING MAINT TECH 6 20,020 25,024 30,031 CD91 BUYER - k 6 200020 25,024 30,031 CC93 CIS TECHNICIAN 6 20,020 250024 30,031 CD20 CODE ENFORCE OFFICER 6 20,020 2500.14 30,031 BF60 OUST SERV REP ^ SR i 6 20,020 250024 300031 CD35 HEALTH INSPECTOR II 6 200020 25,024 300031 CD95 INSPECTOR - HOUSING 6 20,020 25,024 30,031 CB40 LABORATORY TECH b 200020 25,024 300031 CD45 MAIN/ TECHCAR-LEAD o Exhibit F (Continued) Pages 4 * City of Denton Proposed Grade Assignments (Excluding Executives, Police, Fire, Seasonal, Temporary) 1 Prop Proposed Proposed Proposed 000 Grd# Minimum Midpoint Maximum Code - Job Title 6 200020 25,024 30,031 - BF70 HUN COURT SR ASST - 6 20,020 250024 30,031 BG40 PERSONNEL REP - SR 6 20,020 25,024 300031 BI40 SUPV LIBRARY ASST 6 20,020 25,024 30,031 CC71 TAX TECHNICIAN 6 20,020 250024 30,031 CD55 TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECH 6 20,020 25,024 300031 CC65 WATER PROD SHIFT OPR 6 20,020 25,024 300031 CD60 WATER TREATMENT TECH 6 20,020 250024 30,031 BF50 WORD PROC OPER-LEAD 6 200020 250024 30,031 CC91 WW PROCESSING TECH 6 200020 25,024 30,031 CC60 WW TREAT SHFT OPR II 1 7 22,422 280028 330634 DD40 ACCOUNTANT 7 220422 28,028 330634 CC15 COMPUTER OPER - LEAD 1 7 220422 280028 33,634 MA50 OUST SVC SUPV 1 7 220422 28,028 33,634 CE20 ELEC SWITCHBOARD OPR 7 220422 280028 33,634 CD96 ELECTRIC METER TECH 7 22+422 280028 33,634 CE25 ELECTRONIC TECHN 7 22,422 280028 33,634 CD30 EKG TECH II 7 22,422 28,028 33,634 C030 FIRE INSPECTOR 7 22,422 28,028 33,634 DC30 HORTICULTURIST 7 22,422 28,028 330634 CE10 INSPECTOR - BUILDING 7 220422 280028 330634 CE11 INSPECTOR - COMB 7 220422 28,028 33,634 CE15 INSPECTOR - ELECTRIC 7 229422 280028 330634 CE40 INSPECTOR - PLUM MEC I 7 22,422 28,028 33,634 BK10 LEGAL ASSISTANT 7 220422 280028 330634 CE66 MAINT TECH - LEAD 1 7 220422 28,028 330634 CC94 PLANNING TECHNICIAN 7 22,422 28,028 33,634 CE45 PNEUMATIC INSTR TECH 7 22,422 280028 33,634 CE60 POLLUTION CNTRL OFFR 7 22,422 280028 33,634 DB10 PROGRAMMER ANALYST I 7 22,422 280028 33,634 DB20 RECREATION SPEC I i i i {r,P..tMRti] 4 tee` ` /~^~.nrrrl ~~t • - Exhlblt F (Continued) Pages 5 * city of Denton + Proposed Grade Assignments (Excluding Executives, Police, Fire, Seasonal, Temporary) E I Prop Proposed Proposed Proposed Oco Grd# Minimum- Midpoint Maximum_ Code- ___r_rJob Title i 7 22,422 28,028 330634 CE50 RELIEF SHIFT FIREMAN 7 270422 28,028 33,634 B110 SECY - EXECUTIVE f 7 220422 28,028 33,634 MB61 SUPV STATIST SERV 7 220422 28,028 33,634 MA30 SUPV WAREHOUSE 8 25,114 310391 37,671 DC11 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSTS 8 250114 31,391 37,671 CD10 ASSISTANT CHEMIST 8 25,114 31,391 370671 CE68 BLDG MAINT TECH-LEAD 8 25,114 31,391 37,671 M850 CHIEF CASHIER 8 25,114 310391 37,671 CE67 CITY SECRETARY a 25,114 31,391 37,671 C025 ELECTRICIAN 8 25,114 310391 37,671 DF71 EKG ASSOC I - CI'VI[, 8 25,114 310391 37,671 DF70 EKG ASSOC I - ELEC 8 25,114 31,391 37,671 DF73 EKG ASSOC I - FIRE 8 25,114 31,391 37,671 DF72 ENO ASSOC I - TRAFFC 8 25,114 31,391 37,671 CE55 ENGINEERING TECH-SR 8 25,114 31,391 37,671 BJ10 EXEC SEC TO CITY MGR 8 250114 31,391 370671 CC30 FIRE ARSON/INVEST 8 25,114 31,391 370671 DD30 I;0RARIAN II 6 25,114 31,391 37,671 CD40 LINEMAN 8 25,114 31,391 37,671 DD50 PERS COMPUTR ANALYST 8 25,114 31,391 370671 DC40 PERSONNEL GENERALIST 8 25,114 31,391 37,671 CE80 PLANNING TECH GIS-SR 0 250114 31,391 37,671 DC25 REC CENTER SUPV i 8 25,114 31,39' 37,671 DC35 REC SPECIALIST II 8 250114 31,391 37,671 CE69 SANITARIAN 8 25,114 3103A1 37,671 MB40 SUPV PARRS 4 8 25,114 31,391 370671 MD35 SUPV SOL WASTE COMM 8 25,114 31,391 37,671 MB36 SUPV SOL WASTE LANDF B 25,114 310391 37,671 MA20 SUPV SOLID WASTE RES a 25,114 310391 37,671 MB81 SUPV SPECIAL PROJECT a i Exhibit F (Continued) ' Page: 6 City of Denton Proposed Grade Assignments (Excluding Exeoutives, Police, Fire, Seasonal, Temporary) i Prop Proposed Proposed Proposed Occ Grd# Minimum Midpoint Maximum Code ------job-Title 8 25,114 31,391 37,671 MB45 SUPV VEHTCLE MAINT 8 25,114 310391 37,671 CE70 TECHNICAL ASSISTANT 9 28,128 35,158 420191 DE92 ADMIN SERVICES COORD 9 280128 35,158 42,191 DG85 ASST CITY ATTY I 9 28,128 35,158 420191 CE30 ELECTRICIAN - LEAD t 9 280128 35,158 421191 DG80 EMERGENCY MGMT COORD l i 9 28,128 35,158 42,191 DF80 FINANCIAL ANALYST 9 28,128 35,158 42,191 MD55 FORE METER REPAIR l 9 28,128 35,158 42,191 MB60 FORE W/S FIELD SERV 9 280128 35,158 42,191 CE35 LINEMAN - LEAD 9 28,128 35,158 42,191 DE60 PERSONNEL SPECIALIST 9 280128 35,158 42,191 DE20 FROG ANALYST II 9 28,128 350158 42,191 MB30 SUPV FIELD SERVICES 9 28,128 350158 421191 MA10 SUPV STREETS 9 280128 35,158 420191 MB20 SUPV WATER PROD MNT 9 280128 35,158 42,191 MB25 SUPV WATER PROD OPER DE90 URBAN PLANNER 9 28,128 35,158 42,191 1 9 28,128 35,158 42,191 DE15 UTILT'TIES ACCT - SR 10 31,502 39,379 47,253 DE10 ACCOUNTANT - SENIOR 10 31,502 39,379 470253 OF30 ADMIN ANALYST 10 310502 390379 471253 MC30 AIRPORT MANAGER 10 31,502 39,379 47,253 DG92 BUDGET ANALYST i 10 31,502 39,379 47,253 CE75 BUYER - SENIOR 10 31,502 39,379 470253 DF50 CIS RATE ADMIN 10 310502 39,379 47,253 DF60 COMMUNITY DEV COORD 10 31,502 39,379 47,253 DE80 ENERGY INFO SPEC 10 31,502 390379 47,253 DG31 ENO ASSOC It - CIVIL 10 31,502 39,379 47,253 DG30 ERG ASSOC It ELEC 10 31,502 39,379 47,253 MB80 FORE ELEC MAIN'I k I I Vo, A`PA[riY. Exhibit F (Continued) Page: 7 * City of Denton Proposed Grade Assignments (Excluding Executives, Police, Fire, Seasonal, Temporary) E Prop Proposed Proposed Proposed Occ Grd# Minimum Midpoint Maximum Code 10 Job Title 1 31,502 39,379 470253 MB75 FORE ELEC PROD OPER 10 31,502 39,379 470253 MB65 FORE ELECTRIC DIST 10 310502 39,379 47,253 MB70 FORE METERING/SUBST 10 31,502 39,379 47,253 MB71 FORE SUBSTATIONS 10 31$02 39,379 47,253 M815 FORE WSTWTR TRTM NUT 10 31,502 399379 47,253 MB10 FORE WSTWTR TRTMT OP 10 31,502 39,379 47,253 DF61 MAIN STREET COORD 10 31,502 390379 47,253 DF40 MUNICIPL COURT ADMIX 10 31,502 39,379 47,253 DF85 PARRS PLANNING COORD 10 31,502 39,379 470253 DG60 PLANNER - SENIOR 10 31,502 390379 47,253 MD20 SUPV TRAFFIC 11 35,283 440102 52,924 D120 ASST CITY ATTY II 11 35,283 44,102 520924 D.130 ASST TO THE CITY MGR 11 350283 44,102 520924 DG40 BUDGET 6 RATE ADMIX 11 35,283 449102 52,924 DE93 CHEMIST 11 35,283 440102 52,924 DF75 LEISURE SERV ADMZN 11 350283 44,102 52,924 D150 LIBRARIAN III 11 35,283 440102 52,924 DE94 PRETREAT FROG COORD 11 150283 440102 520924 DG91 FROG ANALYST III 11 35,283 44,102 52,924 DF90 PUB INFO COORD UTIL 11 35,283 44,102 520924 MD40 SUPV ELEC 11 350283 44,102 52,924 MD10 SUPV ENG TECH 11 35,k83 440102 52,924 MC10 SUPV OFFICE AUTOMAT E 12 39,516 490396 59,274 MF20 BUILDING OFFICIAL 12 39,516 49$96 590274 MF40 CUST SVC MGR 12 39,516 49,396 59,274 DI60 DATA BABE ADMIX 12 39,516 49,396 59,274 DH40 ENGINEER 12 390516 490396 59,274 MD60 ENV HEALTH SERV MGR ! 12 39,516 49,396 59,274 DH50 ENVIRON SERV ADMIN w MENNEN! Exhibit F (Continued) Pages 8 * City of Denton Proposed Grade Assignments (Excluding Executives, Police, Fire, Seasonal, Temporary) f t Prop Proposed Proposed Proposed Ooo Jab Title Grdt Minimum Midpoint Maximum Code r 12 390516 49,396 590274 MF50 FIRE MARSHALL 12 39,516 490396 59,274 MF30 PURCHASING AGENT 12 39,516 490396 59,274 DG90 RISK MANAGER 12 390516 490396 590274 ME70 SUPT BUILDING OPER 12 39,516 49,396 59,274 ME60 SUPT FLEETS 12 39,516 49,356 59,274 MG20 SUPT LEISURE SERV 12 34,516 49,396 590274 MF10 SUPT PARKS MAINT 12 39,516 49,396 59,274 ME40 SUPT SOLID WASTE ` 12 39,516, 49,396 59,274 MESO SUPP STREETS ~ 12 390516 49,396 590274 ME30 SUPT WATER/SEWER DIS 12 39,516 49,396 59,274 DH60 TREASURER 13 44,258 55,324 66,387 DJ20 ASST CITY ATTY - SR 13 .440258 55,324 66,387 D130 CONTROLLER 13 44,258 55,324 66,387 MG10 ELECTRIC PROD MGR 13 44,258 55,324 660387 D111 LNG ADMIN - CIVIL r 13 44,258 550324 66,387 D110 ENG ADMIN - ELEC 13 44,258 55,324 660387 ME80 SUPT ELSC DIST 13 440258 55!324 660387 ME90 SUPT METERING/SUBST 13 440258 55,324 66,387 ME20 SUPT WASTEWATER TRT 13 44,258 550324 66,387 ME10 WATER PROD MGR t -,a 1 ' nr•r.~ ~ ~ N._•-. r"w.r..r...~.µ .evr~ ...~....r~r r~r Exhibit G * City of Denton Proposed Pay Plan for police 1991/1992 { Base Position Rate 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 5 Years 7 Years 9 Years Police Officer $23,910 $25,17.r) $260411 $27,758 $29,174 $30,661 $31,773 Corporal $32,900 Sergeant $350500 „•1 Lieutenant $39,435 Captain $43,752 i, i 'j 1 j i. i i. t 1 t Exhibit H f * City of Denton Proposed Pay Plan for Fire v 1991/1992 !lase Position Rate 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years i Fire Fighter $24,500 $25,480 $26,499 $27,559 $28,518 Driver $30,335 Captain $36,248 Batt. Chief $40,559 i Div. Comm. $42,500 1 E f 3 .f i! h _ ,III r i t i z t w l i Inhibit I * City of Denton Proposed pay plan Police - Non Civil Service 1991/1992 Prop. Base Grade Pay Step 1 Step 3 Job Title i 1 22,758 23,327 23,910 Recruit EE E , f j. l I' ii 11 f~ f' OEM- { Mrs tpol 1 Exhibit J I * City of Denton Proposed Pay Plan Fire - Non Civil service 3 1991/1992 Job Title Prop. Base step 1 step 2 Grade N Pay , 24o500 Reorltit 28x319 23f902 1 I i i i I ~ ik., n DW I ' i Exhibit K * city of Denton Recommended Salary Structure Seasonal Positions Prop. Grd# Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 1 4.28 4.49 4.72 2 4.71 4.94 5.18 3 5.27 5.53 5.60 t 4 6101 6.31 6.62 5 6.97 7.32 7.69 1 i - L f s I t S i s Exhibit L City of Denton Proposed Executive Salary Structure !J f Proposed Prop Proposed Control Occ Grd# Minimum Point Code Job Title 5 $69,657 $870071 JA15 Deputy City Manager 5 $69,657 $87,071 JA85 Executive Director - utilities 4 $64,498 $80,622 JA25 Executive Director - Finance 44 4 $640498 $80,622 JA14 Executive Director - Hun Svc/Econ Dev r -1 3 $59,720 $74,650 JA35 Executive Director - Planning 3 $59,720 $74,650 JA82 Director - Electric Utilities 3 $58,720 $74,650 JA75 Police Chief 3 $590720 $74,650 JA70 Fire Chief 2 $550296 $69,120 JA45 Director - Parks & Recreation 2 $550296 $69,120 JA16 Director - Personnel/Employee Relations " 2 $55,296 $69,120 JA30 Director - Information Services 2 $550296 $69,120 JA83 Director - Water Eng/Operations 1 $51,200 $64,000 JA95 Director - Trans/Engineering 1 $510200 $64,000 JA60 Director - Community Services 1 $510200 $64,000 JA40 Director - W.brary 1 $51,200 $64,000 JABO Director Environment/Util Adz i i l I 1 s ,7 G F r I Exhibit M i * City of Denton Sample Merit Guideline Chart for Exempt Positions* r i Distribution First Second Third Fourth Performance Level Percentage Quartile Quartile Quartile Quartile** Far Exceeds 10% 14% 13% 12% 11% Frequently Exceeds 20$ 12% 11% 10$ 9$ Meets Expectations 60% 10% 9% 6$ 7$ j ~ j Needs Improvement 10% 0% 0% 0% 0$ * sample performance increase guidelines - dollars funded and percentages are a budgetary item subject to City Council appproval of annual budget. One time lump sum award not rolled into base hourly rate. I , I i f i I~ 4 3r . ~ show. . ktl'32wi 1 Exhibit N * City of Denton sample Merit Guideline Chart for Non-Exempt Positions* Fourth Distribution First Second Third Performance bevel Percentage Quartile Quartile Quartile Quartile** 1 Consistently 10$ 12$ 11$ 10$ 9$ Exceeds Meets 80& 10% 9% 8$ 7% Requirements Needs 10$ 0$ 0$ 04 0% Improvement * Sample performance increase guidelines - dollars funded and percentages are a budgetary item subject to city council appproval of annual budget. one time lump sum award not rolled into base i,.ourly rate. i Il i . 4i11AW4!a..I.NYRASf44/luer.Y Ve..r..=