HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-22-1991
1
r
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOEER 22, 1991
Work Session of the City of Denton City council on'"uesday, October
22, 1991 at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of City Hall, 215
E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be
considered: f
5:15 p.m.
1. Receive a report and bald a discussion - °arding council
district boundary adjustment options.
2. Receive a report and hold a discussion on preliminary
recommendations for the 1991/92 Employee Health Insurance
program.
3. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding private e-
S' property accidents.
4. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding amending the
u, sign ordinance.
5. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the City's
current travel policy.
6. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the zoning
ordinance rewrite.
C E R T I F I C A T E i
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texts, on
the day of , 1991 at o'clock _(a.m.)
(p.m.) .
r
CITY SECRETARY
A000009
S
1
F
w sl
r, eoe,a?,7
t
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
October 22, 1991
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: DISCUSS ALTERN TIVE PLANS FOR ADJUSTING VOTING DISTRICT
j BOUNDARIES AND GIVE STAFF FURTHER IRECTTON-q
Three alternative plans for adjusting voting district boundaries
have been prepared in accordance with the criteria adopted by city i
Council on October 1, 1991. i
Maps showing options A, B, and C are included in attachment #1. j
a Population figures taken from the 1990 census are tabulated for the
existing voting districts and for options A, B, and C given in
attachment #20 In drawing up alternative plans every effort has
been made to enhance the voting strength of the black and hispanic
population and at the same time to minimize county precinct splits. i'
Staff is currently working with Winn Walton of the UNT Student
Association to address some of his concerns with regards to the
splitting of campus buildings. We will provide council with a
report and any additional maps at the study session on October 22, C
r 1991.
BAC GROUND:
City Council adopted a list of criteria and a schedule of
activities on October 1, 1991 to be used in the process of
adjusting voting districts boundaries. Staff has discussed the
alternative plans with community leaders including Carl Williams,
Ruby Cole, Euline Brock, Curtis Ramsey, Mark Chew, Carl Young, Popo
Gor;;ales, Frank Davila, Gloria Bahamon and UNT Student Winn Walton.
Car:. Young together with LULAC representatives (Davila, Gonzales,
Bahamon) and Winn Walton have expressed the need and support for a E
6 - 1 electoral system.
i
i;
t
r
►1
l!pa. r:~AG+:R,rry
♦Ys. ftzffYl'.`
r
,
N
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
All residents of the city,
s k~, SCAL IMPACT I
Not applicable.
Respectf lly submitted i'
Lloyd V. Harrell
r' City Manager
prepared by:
,u
Harry W. AICP
Senior Planner
Approved
i
Frank H. Robbi s, AICP
Executive Director, Planning and Development.
a
Attachment.
(1) Maps for Options A, B and C.
(2) Populations figures for existing districts, options A, B and C.
{
J
2
3
r
E i
r,
II r
I
~Y44h2t?'
i
l
ATTACHMENT 1
See Maps for options A, B & C
provided in your packet. f
r
I :a
,f
f
~I
i
a
t
l
raaau
t
I
i
a
r
II
1
ATTACHMENT 2
CURRENT DISTRICTS Page 1
POPULATION DISTRIBUTION _
j
s
WHITE ERCENT BLACK ~EIICENT HISPAN ERCENT
DISTRICTS TOTPOP =TOTAL'
TRICT 1 18045 27.23 12192 67.56% 2915 16;15%' 2277 j2;6%
DIS
DISTRICT 2 18040 27,22 15545 86.17%m 1125 6,24% 1108 6.1401o
f
DISTRICT 3 14260 21,52 11578 81.19% 1015 7,12% 1134 7.95% ! f
1 ~
DISTRICT 4 15925 24,03 12653 79.45% 1151 7.230/c 1418 8.90%
CITY TOTAL 66270 100.00 51968 78.42% 6206 9.36% _ 5937 8.96%
v'
i
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT {R}?DIST} 01-0ct-91 09:51
1
1,✓•• bPiklYaN
y
OPTION A Page 2
POPUI,ATION DISTRIBUTION
I
' DISTRICTS T04'YOP OF WRITE PERCEiVT BLACK ERCENf HISPAfY ERCENT
- TOTAL
{li DISTRICT 1 17352 26,18 11584 66,76% 2873 I6,56go: 2242
DISTRICT 16574 25.01 14441 87,13% 929 5.61% 956 6,77%
DISTRICT 3 15726 23,73 12682 80,64%a 1211 7.7Wo 1286 8.18%
DISTRICT' 4 16618 25.08 13261 79,SU% 1193 7,18% 1453 8.74%
1
f CITY TOTAL 66270 100,00 51968 78,42°!0 6206 9.36% 5937 8,96% [
f
Fa
PLANNING AND
, DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT {REDIS7} Of-Oct-91 09,49
i
F;
i
i
E
1
I' .n
OPTION B Page 3
i
POPULATION DISTRIBUTION
DISFRW75 TOTPOP 960E WHITE
PERCENT BLACK PEC
RENT HlSPAN PERCENT
- --.TOTAL `
DISTRICT 1 17032 27.23 113$5 66.84% 2830 16,62%I 2304. 13,53
DISTRICT 2 16392 27,22 13830 84,37% 1233 7,52% 10,51 6,41%
DISTRICT 3 16879 21.52 1 °
32b0 78.56 /0 127$ 7.57% 1486 8.80% {
s
DISTRICT 4 15967 24.03 13493 84.51% 865 5.42% 1096 6.86%
CITY TOTAL. 66270 100 51968 78,42% 6206 9.36% 5937 8.96%
1 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT {REDIST) 01-Oct--91 09;47
i.
i
k r4,
1
' liT.'r' C-eJ4Y
4
M
1 ARVS"ISF
4
1
OPTION C Page 4
s
POPULATION DISTRIBUTION
DISTRICTS TUTPOP PERCENT WHITE PERCENT BLACK PERCENT HISPANIC PERCENT
DISTRICT 1 17356 26.19 11228 64.69 2861 16.4$'. 2646 ]5,"25.
DISTRICT 2 15744 23.76 13459 85.49 1181 1.50 898 5.70
DISTRICT 3 15887 23.97 13276 83,57 932 5.87 1006 6.33 ?
DISTRICT 4 17283 26.08 14005 81.03 1232 7.13 1387 8.03
i
CITY TOT A 66270 _ 100.00 _ 51968 78,42 _ 6206 9.36 5937 8.96
f
I
r
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (REDIST) 01-Out--91 09;45
I
1
t
i
i
i
MEMORANDUM
E
TO: Betty McKean, Executive Director
Municipal Services and Economic Development I
FROM: Thomas W. Klinck, Director
Personnel/Employee Relations 1
DATE: October V, i991
4
SUBJECT: Preliminary Recommendations on the Employee Health Insurance
Program
This memo is to provide an update to City Council on the preliminary results
of our evaluation of the Employee Insurance Program and to outline
recommandations for the Employee Health Insurance Program beginning January
1992.
On April le, 1991 the City Council authorized a comprehensive evaluation of
the current Employee Health Insurance program to explore alternative plans
to most the City's long range goals for providing a sound, quality, service-
oriented, and cost effective Employee Health insurance program. Following
staff recommendation, the City Council awarded a contract to Coopers &
Lybrand to evaluate the current health insurance plan and develop
alternative opt.ons to meet the City's long range goals,
Coopers and Lybrand was retained to perform the following services, working
! closely with staff and the Employee Insurance Committee:
1. Explore direct contracting with and negotiate with local
medical providers on behalf of the City for favorable rates,
r
2. Negotiate with appropriate medical facilities within the
Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex for tertiary services, such as by-
pass heart surgery and other specialized medical services not
available within our lot.al provider market.
i
3. Develop and analyze alternative plans and conduct actuarial
projections of such plans, based upon negotiated arrangements
with providers.
b. Develop final draft contracts with the appropriate hospitals,
physicians and/or physician groups and tertiary care
facilities and submit the, contracts to the City for approval.
1 6. Undertake negotiations with Santis/N.Y. Life for a 1991/92 plan
year renewal.
I
3
s
a. f
t
yl
f, F
C ~
I:)
i
October 17, 1991
Memo to Betty McKean on Employee Insurance Program
Page 2
i
I
# Since we began to evaluate the Employee Health Insurance program in May,
1991, we have accomplished the following:
o Negotiated extensively with Sanus for the 1991/92 plan year.
I o Met and negotiated with local physician groups and both hospitals for
direct provider contracts with the City at favorable costs.
o Developed contracts for tertiary care services with Dallas/Ft. Worth
medical facilities.
o Worked closely with the Employee Insurance Committee to develop
alternative plan designs, evaluate service, and quality issues.
o Performed actuarial projections of each health insurance plan
alternative.
o Rated selected plans based upon provider arrangements, plan design and
a costs to City and employees.
i Out of this process, we developed two fully--insured arrangements for bid f
c purposes:
1. A fully-insured, traditional health insurance plan, similar to
the Sanus/Mew York Life program.
2, A fully-insured, managed care program, with direct contracts
with medical providers.
We invited companies to submit letters of interest for the City's health
insurance program, under these two arrangements (a fully-insured,
k traditional health insurance plan, and a fully-insured, managed care
program)
For 01 above, bids for a fully-insured, traditional program were sent to
nine companies that expressed interest in reviewing our requests. This bid
was published in the Denton Record-Chronicle. None of the nine companies
that expressed an interest, submitted a bid for a traditional fully-insured
plan. However, Sanus/N.Y Life also submitted a bid for a new program with
costs higher than their ronewal for our current HMO Only/Sanus Plus program,
We are recommending that this bid be rejected,
For M2 above, three companies, (Cigna, Travelers, and Philadelphia American)
expressed an interest in a fully-insured, managed care arrangement, using
the City's direct contracts with medical providers.
Discussions with the Denton Independent Physicians Association (DIPA), North
Texas Medical/Surgeons Association (NTM/S), Denton Regional Medical Center
(Denton Regional) and Denton Community Hospital (MCA Denton) provided quotes
for medical services that are substantially discounted below current health
'Vi'i
b
2
a
October 17, 1991
Memo to Betty McKean on Employee Insurance Program
Page 3
r f insurance program costs.
Thus, some of the local medical providers (Denton Regional Hospital, HCA
Denton, and the DIPA) expressed concern regarding the release of this
confidential contractual information to Cigna and Travelers. These local
E medical providers have already existing contracts with Cigna and Travelers,
and, thus, any release of City negotiated contracts for medical services
could potentially jeopardize the medical providers arrangements with Cigna
and Travelers. This represented a conflict of interest. Thus, we
determined that it would be to the advantage of the City to negotiate
t directly with Philadelphia American to underwrite a proposed health '
( insurance program for two reasons. First, Philadelphia American did not
have any conflicts of interest with local medical providers that could have
s an adverse impact on its ability to provide the City with a cost effective,
fully-insured managed care program. Second, this company's preliminary
costs meet the City's cost objectives, without limiting employees' access to
local providers.
i
In order to fulfill state law concerning the bidding of all health insurance
contracts, bids have been solicited through advertising in the Denton
&cord-Chronicle. Philadelphia American has submitted their bid. All final
bids are due October 28, 1991. However, it is anticipated that Philadelphia
American's preliminary plan design, rates, and costs are more suited to the
City's current and long-term goals. Based upon our contacts with other.
vendors, we anticipate that there will be no other bids. But, if we receive
a responsible bid favorable to the City's defined goals and objectives, we
will address it in our final recommendation to City Council.
I All of these extensive discussions and negotiations with local providers and
j Philadelphia American yielded a very favorable plan design, improvement in
medical provider accessibility, and costs arrangements. In addition, a
third year renewal for Sanus/New York Life was negotiated by Dave Palatiere
(Coopers & Lybrand). The 1991/92 Sanus renewal was a much better rate
increase than the 1990/91 rate increase of approximately 22%. Thus, Dave
developed and presented to the Employee Insurance Committee the following
two alternative programs:
i
1. Renew the current Employee Health Insurance contract with Sanus/New York
Life. This alternative represents:
Renew the contract with Sanus/New York Life for a January 1,
1992 plan year offective date at a 2% rate increase for Sanua
HMO Only, and an 8% rate increase for Sanus Plus.
2. Contract with Philadelphia American Life for a fully-insured, managed
care program (Network and "Ion-network plan), using negotiated contracts
with local providers and selected tertiary care facilities within the
Dallas/Fort worth metroplex, This alternative represents;
i
1
i
F
October 171 1991
Memo to Betty McKean on Employee Insurance Program
Page 4
Non-Exclusive provider contracts with Denton Region Medical
Center and Denton Community Hospital and the two physician
associations (Denton Independent Physicians Assooiatlon and
North Texas Medical Group), plus medical providers in the
Dallas/Ft. Worth metroplex for tertiary care services.
The proposed plan designs fur each alternative are compared in Attachment A.
Preliminary rate comparisons are shown in Attachment B.
The Employee Insurance Committee evaluated the two program options
(Philadelphia tter Aerican currentfandtlongtrangeegoals. oThehe
two programs bee
Employee Insurance Committee evaluated both programs based upon the ,
following five criteria:
o Stability of Program
o Availability of Providers
0 Quality of service
o Costs and Affordability
o Plan Deslgn
Members of sthe cussmtheseeopInsurance tions. met with andnrk
areas
concerning experiences with Sanus It less than
their dependents'
satisfactory. The overriding consensus of the Employee Insurance Committee
and Dave Palatiere (Coopers A Lybrand) was that the Philadelphia American
option is the better alternative for the City and employees (see Attachment,
C). It provides:
o Access to both local hospitals - Denton Community and MCA Denton
o Access to Dallas/Ft. Worth hospitals for tertiary care not available in
Denton
o Access to both physician groups (DIPA and NTM/S Group, and other
physiolans who ere willing to abide by the reimbsament schedule local`
negotiated); further, it represents a better opportunity
I doctors to participate as providers in the City's health insurance epang
(see e delays ~n speciallst s ref4rrals~y' e1lrr-inate unnecessary gate-
0 A plan design that is both affordable and offers comprehensive health
than aundorethems for
insurance employee's coverage dependent coverage effective that are for lothe wer City
Sanus/N,Y, Life Program
Additionally, our analysis of important plan design criteria and our cost
1
t.
October 17, 1991
Memo to Betty McKean on Employee Insurance Program
Page 6
objectives are clearly met with this alternative. The net cost of the
Philadelphia American plan to the City is lower than the 1991/92 budgeted
costs as shown in Attachment E. As shown in Attachment F, Sanus/N.Y. Life
has shown agreement to extend their current contract to cover us during the
31 days lag in December 1991, before the Philadelphia American Life's
contract goes into effect on January 1, 1992.
Thus, it is staff's recommendation that the City:
o Terminate the current employee health insurance contract with
Sanus/New York Life effective December 31, 1991.
o Authorize staff to develop a service contract with Philadelphia
American and initiate new coverage for employee3 and dependents for a
plan year beginning January 1, 1992,
o AutForiza staff to begin preparations for employee open e,irollment in
November trod December, 1991 to effectively communicate the new
corArn..y a,- co;;ts and ensure an orderly and smooth transition for
the &Avary ;002 plan year effective date.
{ Wif-h the CityOounol! a!>proval, we are prepared to proceed with the attached
im lementst,'.m sxhodu (Attachment 0) for a January 1, 1992 plan effective
data, rhs final crm.tract is scheduled for City Council action on November
1:191,
t
Fined !a, shoWr; q.,t,fLions arise concerning the City's experiences with
Sanus, wo h«vo ir;vitud a respresentive from Sanus/N.Y. Life to be present at
the upco ing Cl y C(}ncl; meeting on October 2P., 1991.
I[ ' If you y have any questions or need additional clarifioation, please let me t
knots.
Thomas W. Klinck
I Attachments
t
s
i
Bmins9la,prn 10/13/91
rev: 10/17/91 (6)
j
i
i
p n
CITY OF DENTON ALtaChtr2►tt A
PROPOSED PLAN DESIGN COMPARISON
Oatobet 17, 1941
SANDS PLUS Pll71.ADHLPlI1A AMER1CAIf SIIrOLI1 PLAN
NETWORK NON-NBTIVORL
:HMO ONLY HMO WON-NETWORK
PCP OFFICE VLVM:
Diap psis wad trsdmeot, 515hdsit $7Msit 5250 +10120% Whisk la~1i of ae>redals
lab, x-rays mrlital Rwowirg 30% res to OPMt
pmoodwel Ma. dws" > Odmo* M will rot
apply b GPM.
PREVENTIVE CARE: No CLr1e No Chow Not Covered SIShisit Not Cowed
Well-baby cars awl routine
iramuoiration
ITI-FCOSPITA Acatio NT: SIOOIAdmiuion $275/Adm- 5250+110120% da~00%tbersaior rIL+M ~
Raquitw Prow/1alekeeper pa Aiw. no vommaw L 50%
applies b OPM. Cbarpo > per
Aiew will $Ol qpb to OPI+I.
OUTPATIENT HOSPITAL 31Wriait $*)Msit $250 +10120% 530 oopay 5300 daAaeilY• no Poo 709i
of eeleAeie Immohlboit 30%
olow b OPAL Cbmps > f
«4W& will ad V* b OP 4.
. 3
z
$wVw
EMEROENCYAMOENT CARE: $401visit $40tvisit $230 +10120% SSOJvWt i
Bompaoy Room in CAN of S
ao accid M Of V40" and
oeriom wed". 4
PRESCRIPTION CRUO1 Not Covered Mdod. Not Covered 510Wded Not Com d
m" ww Arut wores as $V80oeric
the plat m* Oliva cboioa based {
upoo oArm 4w,
' i
$10500 + ded. $1,000 + Asd. $3,000 + Aa4l t dots" it
MAXIMUM ANNUAL $450 $650 (USO ded,) Now of 1&*64ar &OIL
Ol1T-0F-POClCB7's
r`a.}', •;fRYtK#$44Y+dAxx.r. n,... _ >..us c.ti.ck.a t+.ar,:....., _._.....,.,w...m,.eniu. u.cwn.., ..r....
SAMUS/NE1' YORK LIFE
PREMIUM R►,'E STRUCTURE ATTACHMENT 8
f
k~ CURRENT RATES PROPOSED RATES
1 r.,40 Net Difference
city's Employees' Total City's Employee Total Net Rata
Cost Cost Rate Cost Cost Rate Increase
Empl. Only $136.60 20.00-- $116.60 --$137.91 $ 20.00 117.91 i 2.31
Empl. + Sp 136.60 97.03 232.63 137.01 101.70 238.28 6,86
Empl. + Ch 136.60 38.34 173.94 137.91 41.26 177.42 3.48
1 Empl. + Fa 136.60 169.67 296.27 137.91 166.22 301.18 6.91
i
f
' PUS Differatice
City's Employee Total City's Emplyee Total Nat Rata
cost cost Rate Cost Cost Cost Increase
Empl. Only $179.36 $ 2.44 $181.80 183.09 $ 13.26 $196.36 $14.66
Empl. + Sp 179.36 184.67 364.03 183.09 210.07 393.16 29.13
J
Empl. + Ch 179.36 88.46 266.81 183.09 103.98 287.07 21.28 ,
EMpl. + Fa 179.36 307.81 487.17 183.09 343.06 626.14 38.97
.
x
y
E
T~ -WT
" AL!witYd
j
1
l
ArrACWEkr a
PROPOSED SANDS HMO ONLY RATES PROPOSED SANDS PLUS RATES
t
city's Employee Total City's Employee Total
Cost Cost Rate Cost Coat cost
Only $137.91 20.00 $117.91 $183.09 $ 13.26 $196.36
Empl. + Sp 137.91 101.70 238.28 183.09 210.07 393.16
j
Empl. + Ch 137.91 41.26 177.42 183.09 103.98 287.07
Empl. + Fm 137.91 166.22 301.18 183.09 343.06 626.14
PROPOSED PALICO RATES*
f City's Employee Total y
Cost Cost Rate
$179.00
Empl. Only $189.00 $ 10.00 a'
Empl. + Sp 169.00 107.00 276.00
Empl. + Ch 169.00 70.00 239.00
Empl. + Fm 169.00 176.00 344.00
a Subject to final PALICO rate underwriting N,
slides9l.prn {9
t
4~so r=.r~;au1
T
I
ATTACHMENT C
CITY OF DENTON
HEALTH PLAN SUMMARY
f
11, SUMMARY OF HEALTH PLAN ALTERNATIVES
The health plan alternatives have been summarized below in terms of high,
medium, and low level of satisfaction.
Philadelphia
CeIIC Sanus Ame ican
r
I Degree of Stability Low--Has historically High- ,Plan includes
proven to be unstable physicians from Denton
due to lack of suf.
Independent Phyysicians
ficient providers and Association (DIPA) and
provider continuity, North Texas Medical/Surgical "
(NTM/S and both local
"Concerned about hospitals,
continued instability
and continuity of phy-
sicians.
Availability of Low--Per EIC, availability High--Plan includes physicians f
Providers has been poor due to tack from DIPA and NTM/ and
of sufficient physicians both local hospitals, No
offered through HMO plan. gatekeeper requirement,
Gatekeeper requirement, Open to any pharmacist '
One Pharmacy, agreeing to be part of
Network, ;
Quality of Service Questionable--Per E.IC, High--We believe" uality will fi
there are significant improve given physician
quality issues--waiting time, representation and availability
physician referral issues.
Affordability/Cost • High • High
• 2% HMO Increase • Rates approximate
• 8% Sanus Pius Increase Sanus composite,
• 2nd yyear rate guarantee • Rate guarantee
of 14% - Local Hospital
801o/yr, for 3 years
. Local physicians
6%/yr.
Plan Design High High
EIC Recommendation Terminate Program Implement Philadelphia
American program with single
plan.
S
1
I
ATTACHMENT D
INDEUNDENT PHXSICIANS S30CTAVION
4 UPDATED APRIL 05, 199i
5
I
,
I
i
r
j
t
i
I
LIST OF DOCTORS IN THE GROUP. AS OF APRIL, 1991
i
i
a
{
4
ANESTHESIOLOGY
CARDIOLOGY
Carlos J. Garcia, M.D.
303 North Carroll, Ste. 108 R. Conrad Park, M.D.
Denton, Texas 76201 4401-A N. I-35, Suite 250
(817) 566-3788 Denton, TX 76201
$17-382-8080
A. Christian Green, M.D.
303 North Carroll, Ste. 108
Denton, Texas 76201 Tanveer A. Qureshi, M.D.
1 (817) 566-3788 4405 N. I-35, Ste 16
Denton, TX 76201
Zafar A. Hafiz, M.D. 817-566-2358
303 North Carroll, Ste. 108
Denton, Texas 76201
(817) 566-3788 DERMATOLOGY
Robert J. Boren, M.D.
1614 Scripture
Darius P. Pourzan, M.D. Denton, TX 76201
303 North Carroll, Ste. 108 $17-387-5595
Denton, Texas 76201
(817) 566-3788 Clara H. Henry, M.D.
4210 Mesa Drive, Ste C
Booker T. Rogers, Jr.,M.D. Denton, TX 76201
4309 Mesa, Ste. A 817-387-7565
Denton, Texas 76201
$17-566-4095 F
EN DOCRINOLOGYLINTERNAL
Mickey W. Via, M.D. MEDICINE/DIABETICS
4401-A N. I-35, Suite 220
Denton, TX 76201 Anwar I. Moryan, M.D.
# 817-566-3716 4309 Mesa Drive
Denton, Texas 76201
Richard James Wedgeworth, II, M.D. (817) 566-2702
4309 Mesa, Ste. A '
Denton, TX 76201
817-566-4095 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Randy L. Park, M.D.
Denton Regional Medical Ctr.
c/o Emergency Room
jhLLERG 4405 N. 1.35E
Denton, TX 76201
Bediola Badie, M.D. 817-566-4300
North Texas Allergy 4 Asthma Center
2515 Scripture, Suite 101
Denton, TX 76201
$17-382-8144
i
1
1
1
/I
FAMILY PRA=TCE FAMILY PRACTICE
Robert S. Croissant, M.D, Timothy C. McGuire, M.D.
1414 N. Elm 16U Scripture
Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76201
817-382-9636 817-565-9118
J. Robert Gershon, Jr., D.O. Kevin M. McKinney, M.D.
Pilot Point Fam. Med. Clinic 1614 Scripture, Suite 6
1246-C Hwy. 377 S. Denton, TX 76201
Pilot Point, TX 76258
817-686-5511 817-565-1615
Terrence L, Moore, M.D,
Stephen A. Glaser, D.O. 2324 San Jacinto Blvd., Ste 219
Lake Cities Medical
Center 130 N. Hundley Drive Denton, TX 76205
817-565-1565
Lake Dallas, TX 75065
j 817-497-2204 Robert H. Nobles, D,0
I1 2300 Highland Village Rd., Ste. 310 1716 Scripture, Suite E
Lewisville, Texas 75067 Denton, TX 76201
214-317-1110 817-566-0844
Brent Gorman, 10.
1108 Dallas Drive, Suite 300 Joseph M. Scott, K.D.
Denton, TX 76205 The Family Doctors
817-566-5010 1108 Dallas Drive, Suite 300 r
Denton, TX 76201
Don F. Holt, M.D., P.A. 817-566-5010
1614 Scripture, Suite 8 Edward F. Wolski, M.D.
Denton, TX 76201 1701 Broadway Street
817-383-1578 Denton, TX 76201
John Kozura III, D.O. 817-566-0215
1716 Scripture, Suite E
I Denton, TX 76201 Linda E. Yeatts, M, D.
{ 817-566-0844 2324 San Jacinto Blvd, Ste. 219
Denton, Texas 76205
Jack A. Maxwell, D.O. 817-565-1565
Lake Cities Medical Center
130 W. Hundley Drive
Lake Dallas, TX 75065 C.ASSROENTERO
817-497-2204
2300 Highland Village Rd., Ste. 310
Jose
Lewisville, Texas 75067 ph D. Fletcher, M,D.
214-317-1110 Denton, 4405 N. I TX 7 Ste 12
76201
817-387-5577
James A, Haley, M.D,
2509 Scripture, Ste. 105
Denton, Texas 76201
817-382-0900
GMCIKRAL SURGERY GYNPCOLADGY-INFERTZLI_TY-
1 - OBSTETRI_96
Gilbert z. Adami, M.D.
4401 N. I-35, Suits 1 Fred P. Curmings, M.D.
Denton, TX 76202 2515 Scripture Ste. 203
Denton, Texas 76201
1 817-382-6324
1 (817) 898-1476
a l F. Jeffrey Charneyr M.D.
4401-A N. I-35, Suite 170 John F. Dulembar M.D.
Denton, TX 76201 4405 I-35 N., Ste. A
817-382-7321 Denton, Texas 76201
817-566-2466
Janes J. Feldman, M.D. Cindi Marsden M.D.
DDententoonn, N. TX 1-351 76201 Suite 370 2515 Scripture, Ste. 203
817-387-7588 Denton, Texas 76201
817-898-1476
j Frederick D. Kurrus, M.D. M. Mid ett M.D.
4401 N. I-35, Ste 2 . g o
E Denton, TX 76201 323 North Bonnie Brae
817-387-7733 Denton, Texas 76201
817-387-3583
John Michael Marsden, M.D. J. Hampton
Miller M. D.
1300 Fulton, Ste. 203 Denton, Texas 76201 323 N. Bonnie Rrae
Denton, TX 76201
(817) 382-2646 817-387-3583
t Glen Levell Mfzer, M.D.
4401-A N. I-35, Suite 370 Lawrence M. Siocki, M.D.
A a
4405 N. 1-35r Suite
Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76201
817-387-75$8 817-383-1519
1 Curtis L. Mosier, M.D.
1300 Fulton Placer Ste 203 Alan S. Wasserman, M.D.
Denton, TX 76201 4405 N. I-350 Ste B ;
817-362-2646 Denton, TX 76201
817-565-1100
(iYItE aY - 7HFERTILITY
Ronald T. Wilson# M.D.
R. $ryan Boatwright, M.D. 4405 N. 1-35, Suite B
4401-A N. 1-35, Suite 310 817156, TX 76201
Denton, TX 76201
817-383-1663
HEMATOLOGY - ONCOLOGY
YNEnnrn[3Y - INFERTILITY- D
2515 ebra Caudye M.D.
OBTRIGS Denton, TX 76201
Gerard Earl Balsley, Jr.r M.D. 817-382-1022
Associates in Women's Health
1300 Fulton Placer Ste 502 Ajit Dave, M.D.
Denton, TX 76201 4401-A N. I-35r Ste. 270
817-381-0177 Denton, TX 76201
(817) 382-4060
-T'- -
1
f
r
1
j
1
HEIROLOGY
HEMA=,LOGY - ONCOLOGY
Walter G. Carr, K,D., P.A,
N. A. Patel, M.D., P.A. 4401 N. I-35, Suite 145
4308 Mesa Drive, Suite B Denton, TX 76201
Denton, TX 76201 817-387-9566
817-566-4651
David H. Cooke, K.D. i
T)U=AL ] EDICINE 2509 Scripture ST.
Denton, Texas 76201
Jitendra N. Bhatt, M.D. 817-383-1770
1108 Dallas Drive, #337 560 W. Main, Suite 203
Denton, TX 76205 Lewisville, Texas 75057
817-a98-0232 214-420-9200
i
?nark L. Ginnings, M.D.
4401 I-35 He Suite 10 OP LMOLOCY
Denton, Texas 76201
817-387-7441 George E. Holladay, M.D.
525 Bryan (Not
William C. (Bill) McCormick, M.D. Denton, TX 76201 Partners)
E 4401-A 1-35 N., Ste. 8 817-383-2607
t Denton, Texas 76201
( 617-387-1512 Wanda F. Neely, K.D.
11 560 W. Main, 0101A
William M. (Mac) McCormick, M.D. Lewisville, TX 75067 r`
4401-A 1-35 N., Ste. 8 214-436-4141
Denton, Texas 76201
817-387-1512 Roger D. Nunn, M.D., P.A.
Denton Eye Center
Kaslesh B. Thaker, M.U. 525-A Bryan Street
4401-A 1-35 N., Suite 150 Ewnton, TX 76201 (Not
Denton, Texas 76201 (117-382-1511 Partners)
817-566-3000
= NAL MEDICINE PULMONARY
ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY
Dinesh P. Xagal, M.D.
E 4405 I-35 N., Ste. 17 Charles D. Hopkins, M.D.
Denton, Texas 76201 700 West Oak Street
817-387-4371 Denton, TX 76201
817-566-8081
Muke:sh C, Saraiya, M.D.
2509 Scripture St., Ste, 103-A John S. Xristoterson, K.D.
Denton, Texas 76201 4310 Mesa Drive
(817) 381-0971 Denton, TX 76201
817-382-6757
MEDICAL GnNETICS j IMAGING
Stephen A. Weinberg, M.D., P,A.
Mahlon V. R. Freeman, M.D. 4401-A N. I-35, Suite 180
323 N. Bonnie Brae Denton, TX 76201
Denton, TX 76201 817-566-2440
817-387-3585
F
prnT~ICS
l NntaRYNGOLOS,Y Thomas V. Patterson, K.D.
k Robart Akins, M. D., P.A. The Children's Clinic
4401-A I-35 N., Ste. 350 1728 Scripture
t Denton, Texas 76201 Denton, TX 76201
817-382-4205 817-387-3891
Stephen A. Schulman, M.D.
K FD~Y 4401-A N. I-35, Suite 260
Denton, TX 76201
Xenrneth L. Ford, Jr., M. D. 817-382-9448
1600 Scripture
Denton, TX 76201 pr an 6 R_ECONS',~',$
` I 817-383-2383
I SIMQERY
i
j Stuart Lipton, M.D., D.D.S.
~'pnT a 4405 I-35 N-, Ste. 15
j Victor R. Alvarez, M.D. Denton, Texas 76201
t 1300 Fulton, Suite 501 817-566-2445
I Denton, TX 76201
617-382-5466 PSYCH;(ATRY-
James K. Dowling, M.D.
The Children's Clinic C. Edward Fougerousse, M.D-
1728; Scripture 4401 A. I-35, Ste. 340
Denton, TX 76201 Denton, Texas 76201
817-387-3891 817-382-2239 (Not UNT)
Jyoti N. Patel, M.D., P.A. I`
Bruce Eckel, M.D.
4401-A I-35 N., suite 200 4308 Mesa Drive, Suite S
Denton, TX 76201
Denton, Texas 76201
817-565-9110 817_566-4651 (Not UNT)
Marilyn Janke, M.D. RADIOLOS'Y s
2515 Scripture, ate. 201 t
Denton., TX 76201 Jon F. Bergstrom, K.D.
1 817-89s-1477 1614 Scripture, Ste 2
Steve L. Lemons, M. D. Denton, Texas 76201
817387-6159
2515 Scripture, Ste. 203
Denton, Texas 76201 Jules P. Brown, M. D.
817-898-1477 1614 Scripture, Suite 2
Frank T. McGehee, M.D. Denton, Texas 76201
Pediatric Associaton 817-387-6159
4401-A N. I-35, Suite 200
Denton, T!t 76201 Charles Tom Clayton, M. D.
817-565-9110 North TX Radiology Associates
P.O. SOX 2689
Denton, TX 76202
817-382-0923
MCI
f
t•
7
( HAGIOLOGY
RHEumATOLM/ARTHRITIA
l.^ Susan Nichols-Hostetter, M.D.
1614 Scripture, Suite 2 Edward E. Veiayos, H.D.
Denton, Texas 7201 Arthritis center of Denton
(817)387-6159 4308 Mesa DriVe
Denton, TX 76201 (Not
! Robert M. Lockwood, M. D. 817-565-0600 Partners)
1614 Scripture, Ste. 2
1 Denton, TX 76201
817-387-6159 UROLOGY
Lizabeth Reynolds, H.D.
1614 Scripture, Suits 2 Robert C. Adsaire, N.D.
J Denton, TX 76201 2509 Scripture, Suite 100
j 817-387-6159 Denton, Texas 76201
817-387-2241
Edward C. Sacher, M.D.
4405 N. I-35, suite 13
Denton, TX 76201
617-383-2345
{
T. J. Thomas, M. D. , P. A.
4401-A N. I-35, Suite 380
Denton, TX 76201
817-383-1581 , +
i
i ' ICI
I
3
i
i,
I
f
(
.
CONTRACTjRr AFFILIATE SERVICE
l PROVIDERS PHYSICAL THERAPTrA
i
AODjOIAGiST J. Doss Phillips, P.T.
1
Chris D. Caudle, !LS CCCA (DISD Rt. 7, Box 105 C
Denton, Texas (DISD &
4309 Mesa Drive & MLI) 817-566-1099 MLI)
Denton, TX 76201
817-387-0550 Kathy Devine,P.T. (DISD & MLI)
625 Dallas Drive, Ste. 200
~b Denton, Texas 76205
Sharon L. Balsley, CRNA 817-566-5117 & 817-566-6628
'
1318 Auburn (DISD, MLI Jean Ann Seward, P.T.
Denton, Texas 76201 & UNT) 417 South Locust, Ste. 102
(817) 381-0177 Denton, Texas 76201
817- 566-2460 (DISD & MLI)
Susan Blankenship, CRNA (DISD & MLI)
303 North Carroll,. Ste. 108
€ Denton, Texas 76201 Andrea Hawk, P T. (DISD & MLI)
Il 625 Dallas Drive, Ste. 200
Inez Palmer, CRNA (DISD, MLI Denton, Texas 76205
Rt. 1, Box 206 B & UNT) 817-566-5117 & 817-566-6628
Argyle, Texas 76226
87.7-455-2880 Gwen Tao,P.T. (DISD & MLI)
! 625 Dallas Drive, Ste. 200
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY Denton, Texas 76205
Kathy Kautz. O.T.R. (DISD & MLI) 817-566-5117 & 817-566-6628
625 Dallas Drive, Ste. 200 Rod Carmichael,P.T.(DISD & MLI)
j Denton, Texas 76205 625 Dallas Drive, Ste. 200
817-566-5117 & 817-566-6628 Denton, Texas 76205
817-566-5117 & 817-566-6628
DeWsce Smith, MOT, OTR (DISD & MLI)
417 S. Locust, Ste. 102 THE DENTON REGIONAL SPORTS &
Denton, Texas 76201 PHYSICAL THERAPY CENTER
E (817) 566--2460 Stephen E. Campbell, P.T.
Jacel
Caryl Washburn, O.T.R. (DISD & MLI) 534 NortheEI'mng, P.T.
(DISD & s
Rt. 7, Box 105-C Denton, Texas 76201 MLI)
Denton, Texas 76201 817-566-5714
817-387-9089
Nancy Sulak, P.T. (DISD & MLI)
625 Dallas Drive, Ste. 200
Denton, Texas 76205
817-566-5117 4 817-566-6628
PHYSICAL THERAPIST
Elsianne Hortcn,P.T.
Robert Gorton, P.T. (DISD & MLI) Southwest Pediatric Therapy
2412 Old North Rd., Ste 104 417 South Locust, Suite 102
Denton, TX 76201 Denton, Texas 76201
817-367-7446 817-566-2460 (DISD & MLI)
G
~"r 'r HtiiSilS{
'~.'r RP~a14d
1
1
PODIAnisSPEECH PATHOLOGY
tr Thoaas Matheson, DPM Jolene Seabourn, M.S, CCC-SP
1632 West university 4120 Salons Drive (DISD
Denton, Texas 76201 Denton, Texas 76201 MLI)
817-566-1919 817-382-2736
i M. Stuart Altman, DPM Peggy Watson, CCC,M.S. (DISD &
1112 Dallas Dr., Ste. 401 625 Dallas Drive, Ste. 200
Denton, Texas 76205 Denton,Texas 76205 MLI)
} 817-387-3411 817-566-5117 & 817-566-6628
Marcia G. Willson
PSYCHOLOGISTYCMSELLING 417 South Locust, Ste. 102
Denton, Texas 76201
Michael H. Flynn, Ph.D. (DISD & MLI) 817-566-2460 (DISD & MLI)
1108 Dallas Drive, Ste. 333
Denton, Texas 76201
817-566-3285
tt Pete S. Hamilton, Ph.D. (DISD & MLI) TECHNICAL PROVIDERS
E 4401-A I-35 N,, Ste 390
Denton, Texas 76201 RADIOLOGY - -IMAGINIG
r 817-565-1818
` Medical Diagnostics of Denton
Darrell Horton, Ph.D. (DISD & MLI) 4405 N. I-350 Ste 6 1
417 S. Locust, Ste. 102 Denton, TX 76201
{ Denton, Texas 76201-6024 817-566-1122 (DISD & MLI)
817-566-2460
E VASOLAR STUDIES - NON-INVASIVE'
Ron Hughes, Ph.D. (DISD & MLI)
I 376 West Main, Ste, D Denton Vascular Lab., Inc.
I Lewisville, Texas 75057 4401-A N. I-351 Ste 370
(214) 436-2250 Denton, TX 76201 z
817-566-3075 (DISD & MLI)
Gregory G. Lewis, Ph.D. (DISD & MLI)
1108 Dallas Drive, Ste. 333
Denton, Texas 76201
817-566-3285
Linda Polo, Ph.D. (DISD & MLI)
i 4401-A I-35 N1, Ste. 390
j Denton, Texas 76201
(817) 565-1818
~kk
f
E
i
ii
4
S~,.t• . Rkt`iIIM
i
Je,,, , anwuaf
J
HCA DEN C ; C"l7 w HOUPITp.L ,
t ' mICAL STAFF ROSTER 17"! - i i ~ 6
t DATE REVISED: June 26, 1992
At]dmi, Gilbert, M. D. Courtesy Genera]. Surgery
4401 North I-35 Dept. of Surgery
Denton, Texas 76201
382-6324
Reappointed March, 1991
Admire, Robert, M.D. Active Urola2Y
2509 Scripture Dept. of surgery
Denton, Texas 76201
387-2241
Reappointed January, 1990
Altman, Stuart, D.PX Provisional Podiatry
1112 Dallas Drive Dept. of Surgery
Denton, Texas 76201
y 387-3411
Reappointed November, 1990
Alvarez, Victor, M.D. Active Pediatrics a
1300 Fulton, #501 Dept, of Pediatrics/Ob-Gyn
Denton, Texas 76201
382-5466
Reappointed January, 1990
k Amons David, M.D. 8 Medical Parkway Courtesy Cardiathoracic.SUrgery
Y Dept. of Surgery
Plaza 2, #204 Second Office: k
Dallas, Texas 75234-7894 475 West Elm, #101
214/620-2753 Lewisville, Texas 75057
Reappointed February, 1990
Anderson, John, M.D. Active Orthopedio Surgery
2515 Scripture, #100 Dept. of Su).rrery
Denton, Texas 76201
382-1577
Reappointed January, 1990
Anderson, William, M.D. Courtesy Orthopedic surgery
2515 Scripture Dept, of Surgery
Denton, Texas 76201
382-1577
Reappointed January, 1990
E 1
`Mi. , •ISO23tayyy~~,
j,
Angevin, Terry, D.D.S. Courtesy Oral aril Maxillofaeial Surg.
{ 651 Cross Timbers Road Dept. of Surgery
Flag Mound, Texas 75028
214/436-1513
{ Reappointed January, 1991
Atkins, Ronald, M.D. Courtesy Plastic Surgery
2203 Spencer Dept. of Surgery
Denton, Texas 76205
Reappointed January, 1990
Badie, Bediola, M.D. Courtesy Allergies
2515 Scripture Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
ti k 382-4142
Reappointed, January, 1990
Baker, Bruce H., M.D. Provisional Nephrology
500 West Main Dept. of Medicine
Lewisville, Texas 75067
214/219-0558
Appointed March, 1991
Balsley, Gerard, M.D. Active
pt. of Pediatrics/Ob-a+n
1300 Fulton, #502 Drt.
Denton, Texas 76201
381-0177
Reappointed August, 1989
Barker, Jerzy, M.D. Courtesy Radiation Oncology
8200 Walnut Hill Lan Dept. of Medicine
Dallas, Texas 75231
214/696-7394
Reappointed January, 1990
Barrington, Patricia, D.O. Provisional Family Practice
University of North Texas Dept. of Medicine
P.O. Box 5158
Denton, Texas 76203 f
565-2333
Appointed July, 1990
Bergstrom, Jon F., M.D. Provisional Radiology
' 1614 Scripture, #2 Dept, of Medicine Denton, I
Texas 76201 k
387-6159
Appointed October, 1990
BMtt, Jitendra, M.D. Active Internal Medicine
1108 Dallas Drive, #337 Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76205
898-0232
Reappointed January, 1990
2
j
Y
Bittle, Charles C., M.D. Active Internal Medicine
401 North Stemmons Dept. of Medicine
Sarger, Texas 76266
817/458-4428
Reappointed June, 1990
f
' Blair, Major, Jr., M.D. Active Orthopedic Surgery
2515 Scripture, #100 Dept, of Surgery
Denton, Texas 76201
382-1577
Reappointed August, 1990
Blucker, Thomas, M.D. Active Family Practice
2509 Scripture Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
898-7400
Reappointed January, 1990
Boatwright, R. Bryan, M.D, Courtesy Gynecology
4401-A I-351 #1310 Dept, of Pndietrics/Ob-Gyn
Dwiton, Texas 76201
383-1663
Reappointed November, 1990
Bowerran, Minerva, M.D. Active Radiation Oncology
1 2515 Scripture, #105 Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
$66-2328
Reappointed December, 1990
Brown, Jules, M.D. Active Radiology
1614 Scripture, $2 Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
387-6159
Reappointed January, 1990
Burbano, Jose, M.D. Courtesy Family Practice
3740 North Josey law, #150 Dept. of Medicine #
f Carrollton, Texas 75007 ?
214/492-9444 G
I Reappointed April, 1990
Bntjess, Richard, M, D, Courtesy pathology
500-D West Main, #201 Dept. of Surgery
Lewisville, Texas 75057
214/420-1031
Reappointed January, 1990
Carr, Walter, M.D. Courtesy Neurology
4401 North I-35, #145 Dept, of Medicine
Denton, Texas. 76201
387-9566
Reappointed December, 1990
3
MOW.a
r
Carxuth, Alan, M.D. Cautesy Anesthesiology
P.O. Box 292907 Dept, of Surgery
Lewisville, Texas 75029-2907
i 214/219-0257
1 Reappointed January, 1990
Caudy, Debra, M.D. Active Oncology/Hematology
2515 Scripture, #202 Dept. of Medicino
Denton, Texas 76201
382-1022
Reappointed AugL%st, 1990
5 Charnay, Franklin, M.D. Courtesy General Surgery
4401 North I-35, #170 Dept. of Surgery
Denton, Texas 76201
382-7321
Reappointed February, 1990
i Coates, Geoffrey, M. D. Courtesy Emergency Medicine
8411 Preston, Road, #695 Dept. Of Medicine
Dallas, Texas 75225
214/373-1115
Reappointed June, 1990
Cooke, David, M.D. Active Neurology
2509 Scripture Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
387-2241 or 214/420-9200
Reappointed January, 1990
Conyers, James, M.D. Courtesy General Surgery i
560 West Main, #103 Dept.. of Surgery
Lewisville, Texas 75067
214/219-6800
Reappointed April, 1990
Cori itt, Danny, M.D. Active Orthopedic Surgery
j P.O. Box 977 Dept. of Surgery` 3
Lewisville, Texas 75067
I 214/420-1776
Reappointed January, 1990
Croissant, Robert, M.D. courtesy Family Practice
1414 North Elm Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
382-9636
Reappointed January, 1990
Cuchia, John, M.D. Courtesy Pediatrics
36 Timbergreen Dept, of P diatrics/ob-ayn
Denton, Texas 76205
Reappointed January, 1990
4
T-
41
N'•' N'k'1hk'7
f
Wdd, William, D.O. Active Family Practice
G 2412 Old North Road, 0101 Dept. of Medicine
j Dentonr Texas 76201
1 565-0019
Reappointed March, 1990
Cu drgs, Frederick, M.D. Active De~ptynof Pediatrics/OirGyn
2515 Scripture, #203
Denton, Texas 76201
898-1476
Reappointed January, 1990
Dave, Ajit, M.D. Active Nemtology/Onc0109Y
j 4401-A N. 1-35, #270 Dept. of Medicin9
Denton, Texas 76201
382-4060
Ef Reappointed February, 1991
DMAsle, Katherine, D.O. Provisional Emergency MedicinO.
8411 Preston Rd., #695
Dallas, Texas 75225
214/373-1115
Appointer] March, 1991
Dolan, E:.izabeth, M.D. Courtesy Emergency Medicine
8411 Preston Road, #695 Dept. of Medicine
Dallas, Texas 75225
fy 214/373-1115
Reappointed December, 1990
DoWling, James, M.D. Courtesy Pediatrics
1728 Scripture Denton, Texas 76201
387-3891
Reappointed January, 1990
If
Duienba, John, M.D. Courtesy Obstetrics-Gynecology
4405 1-35, Suite A Dept. Of Pediatrics/Ob-Gyn
Denton, Texas 76201
566-2466
Reappointed March, 1991
i i
Ec3ce1, Bruce, M.D. Active Pediatrics !
4401-A North 1-35, 0200 Dept. Of Pediatrics/Ob-Gyn
Denton, Texas 76201
565-9110
Reappointed January, 1991
f courtesy Ceneral Surgery
Feldman, James, M.D.
4401-A North 1-35 Dept. of Surgery
Denton, Texas 76201
387-7588
Reappointed January, 1990
5
.ors.
1
Fletcher, Joseph, M.D. Active Gastroenterology
( 4405 North I-35 Dept. of IWicine
Denton, Texas 76201
387-5577
I Reappointed August, 1990
FoMire, William, M.D. Courtesy Family Practice
University of hurth Texas Dept. of Medicine
P.O. Box 5158
Denton, Texas 76203
565-2333
Reappointed July, 1989
Frazier, William, M.D. Courtesy Emergency Medicine
8411 Preston Road, #695 Dept. of Medicine
Dallas, Texas 75225
214/373-1115
Reappointed November, 1990
Freeman, Mahlon, M.D. Courtesy Ob-Gyn
323 North Bonnie Brae Dept. of Pediatrics/Ob-Gyn
Denton, Texas 76201
387-3585
Reappointed January, 1990
{ Garcia, Carlos, M.D. Provisional Anesthesiology
P.O. Box 2402 Dept, of Surgery
Denton, Texas 76202
566-3788
Appointed March, 1991
i
Gershon, Robert, D.O. Active Family Practice k
P.O. Box 480 Dept. of Medicine
Pilot Faint, Texas 76258
817/686-5511
Reappointed January, 1990
Geslani, Alexis, M.D. Active Emergency Medicine
8411 Preston Road, #695 Dept. of Medicine
Dallas, Texas 75225
214/373-1115
Reappointed November, 1990
Goldberg, Kenneth, M.D. Courtesy Urology
541 West Main, #150 Dept, of Surgery
Imisville, Texas 75067
214/420-8500
Reappointed January, 1990
Gocd an, James L., M.D. Provisional Emergency Medicine
8411 Preston Road, #695 Dept, of Medicine
Dallas, Texas 75225
214/373-1115
6
I
I
If MIMI]
y-'r. 7tn.'xN:i
1
1
Gorman, Brent, D.O. Active Family Practice
( 1108 Dallas Drive, #300 Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76205
566-5010
Reappointed April, 1990
Gray, B. Ken Gray, M.D. Provisional anergency Medicine
8411 Freston Road, #695 Dept, of Medicine
Dallas, Texas 75225
214/373-1115
Green, Christian, M.D. Active Anesthesiology
P.O. Box 2402 Dept. of Surgery
Denton, Texas 76202 E
566-3788
Reappointed May, 1990 y
i
Greene, Douglas, M.D. Provisional anerge cy Medicine
8411 Preston Rd., 0695 Dept, of Medicine
Dallas, Texas 75225
214/373-1115
Appointed September, 1990
Groff, M. Alan, III, D.O. Provisional Family Practice ;
1246-B, Highway 377 South Dept. of Medicine
Pilot Point, Texas 76258
817/686-2254
Appointed April, 1991
Hafiz, Zafar, M.D. Active Anesthesiology
P.O. Box 2402 Dept. of Surgery
Denton, Texas 76202
566-1788
Reappointed March, 1991
~ i
Hagen, Douglas, M.D. Active Family Practice j
2509 Scripture Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201 i
898-7400 j
Reappointed January, 1990 !
Haley, James A., M.D. Provisional Gastroenterology 3
2509 Scripture, #105 Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
382-0900
Appointed June, 1991
Hatton, William, M.D. Courtesy General Surgery
560 West Main, #103 of Surgery
Lewisville, Texas 75067
214/219-6800
Reappointed January, 1990
7
i
.'1 (Pjpyp4''1j
Heighten, Clay, M.D. Active F,mergency medicine
274 G David Fort Road Dept. of Medicine
Argyle, Texas 76226
Reappointed November, 1990
Emergerry Medicine
Helsten, Robert, M.D. Courtesy
4301 Golden Circle Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Teams 76201
Reappointed September, 1990
Hellstern, Ronald, M.D. Active Dwrgency Medicine
C. ` 8411 Preston Road, #695 Dept. of Medicine
Dallas, Texas 75225
E 214/371-1115
Reappointed June, 1990
!
! Henry, Clara, M.D. Courtesy Dermatology
4210 Mesa Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
387-7565 j
Reappointed January, 1990
Holladay, George, M.D. Active Ophthalmology
525 Bryan Dept, of Surgery
Denton, Texas 76201
363-2607
Reappointed January, 1990
Hollandf Peter, D.D.S. Active oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
I 1505 North Elm Dept. of Surgery
Denton, Texas 76201
387-7717
Reappointed January, 1991
Holt, Don F., M.D. Active Family Practice
1614 Scripture Dept: of Medicine ;
Denton, Texas 76201 t
383-1578
Reappointed November, 1989 )
Hopkins, Charles, M.D. Active Orthopedic Surgery
700 West Oak Dept. of Surgery
Denton, Texas 76201
566-8081
Reappointed January, 1990
Isbell, Phillip D., D.0. 1twisional Family Practice
4401-A North I-35, #210 Dept, of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
565-0002
Appointed October, 1990
8
JAy 1
Active Pediatrics
Janke, Marilyn, M.D. Dept, of pediatrics/Ob-OP
2515 Scripture' X203
Denton, Texas 70201
898-1477
Reappointed OL-tober, 1990
Courtesy Pediatrics
Johnson, David, M.D. Dept, of Pediatrics/ob-GYn
809 Gallagher
snerman, Texas 75090
903/892-5570 1990
Reappointed January,
Active pplmorsarY Medicine
E Kagal, Dir"h, M.D. Dept. Of Medicine
4405 l Orth. 1-35, 017
Denton, Texas 76201
387-4371 1990
Poappointed January,
pediatrics
h 1Ganadia, Kiran'suM. D. courtesy ite 205 Dept. of pediatrics/Ob-Gyn
560 West Main, 75057
Lewisville, Texas 214/420-4200 1991
Reappointed February,
Kelly, Roger, M.D. CO°l ~y Depf Medicine
l
4309 Mesa
Denton, Texas 76201
383-2622 1990
Reappointed January,
Oral surgery
Kindrick, Ray, D.D.S.rt' Dept, of surgery
1300 Fulton
Denton, Texas 76201 5
387-9015 1990
Reappointed May,
Active Family Practice
Kpyura0 John, D.O. Dept, of Medicine
1716 Scripture, Suite E
Denton, Tends 76201 I
383-8300 1990
Reappointed January,
Internal Medicine
Krever, Edward, M•D. courtesy Dept, of Medicine
651 Cross Timbers, 1101
LeWi.sville, Texas 75028
214/221-2202
1990
Reappointed August,
orthopedic surgery
Yriet• ferson, John, M.D. Active
Dept, of surgery
4310 Meg" 76201
Denton, Toms
382-6757 1990
` Reappointed January,
9 t'
.a my um
i
i
Cour'tesy General Surgery
K Fred, M. D. Dept. of Surgery
44401 01 N North I-35
DW*W, Texas 16201
387-7733
Reappointed January, 1990
i Lae, Robert, M.D. Active Gynecology
Dept, of Pediatrics/Ob-GYn
7,509 scripture
Denton, Texas 76201
898-7400 1990
appointed January,
Active Pediatrics
Lamals, Steve, M.D. Dept, of Pediatrics/Cb-Gyn i
2515 Scripture, #201
Denton, Texas 76201
898-1477
Reappointed August, 1990
j j jApton, John S. , M.D. Provisional Plastic & Reconstructive surgery o"
4401 I-35 North Dept Of Surgery
Denton, Texas 76201
566-2445 1990
Appointed September,
l Mk pool, Robert, M. D, Active Radiology
J.
1614 Scripture, #2 Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
387-6159
Reappointed February, 1990
I
cBrayer, Harvard, M.D. Active Family Practice
M
Dept, of Medicine
2509 scripture
j
Denton, Texas 76201
898-7400
Reappointed January, 1990
MoGeheeo Frank, M.D. Active Pediatrics
4401-A North 1-35, #200 Dept. of Pediatrics/Ob-GYn
Denton, Texas 76201
565-1110
Reappointed January, 1990
Mocxtirer Timothy, M.D. courtesy Family Practice
1614 Scripture Dept. of Medicine
E Dentton, Texas 76201
565-9118
I Reappointed November, 1989
McKinney, Kevin, M.D. Active Family Practice
Dept. of Medicine
1614 Scripture
Dentonr Texas 76201
565-1615
Re ;ppoin'ccd March, 1991
10
#
'l
Tom-
Ir 1
~ ti.
r i MMI~jF + ~ ~i OPTION A
4C 401
Proposed District
Boundary
. Existing District
. 7 J~
Boundary _ INSET
i -`Precinct Boundary L -j ' ~ . ~ ~ {
r t '
Precinct Split ,
417
f
i
r F'
1
Y
f~'.
r]~ i
1i.
5.
i
1
1
I
4 1 i
S
~ 1 i
i
i
I Q,
ArL
07* ~ _ 1r ~I A ~I w~l i, ail ~ ~ ~'ll:dr'~I f 1 ~ ~i
l.y i 1 1 M1 {
>✓ti I - R' i aA ~~'.M~ Iw~.._ A Ali r _ J r. ~
.mi
I i~ ~ Iw ~a. r 10
;:Y'
1 ~R , a rl~ I
ate 1 / 1~ I 1 ` l 11~1A ~ h ~ I 1h I I ~ _ _ n 1 r~a I ~
~ I+ Mll ll ~ ~'1
I Lvw so
I I I 405 7. ~4 i
I I 'I'i ~~I~-I-=- ~~~51I 5
1I \
yy ~ }
r if ~.y~.
~l r.
IF-
I~
,i
tl ,ill ter. I _ I _ I ~ rl ~ ' /r' . ~ 1 ✓
~ I~-
u Ili ..e I ~ \
tuft un w. R .w_ J 1 ~o
- _ 416 415 " LIP
I i ~
I ~a I i
I l t V \ l
k'
1 1 1 ~ \ I
b I
412 I 412 p
. ram - - - -
y~
rs
C
Y.
[MRjyjI ,
Y
,r 1 iJ
11
y:
II ~
;L
LIB f ~ n a
I
1'-i.
~i
J, ;.^v:.
y,
~ 11 Y
1 _Ir,
f
1 ' I ~
`
~ I
I f Y
, 7V-
V Y f
'66 II
i
OPTION B
4t 401 +
Proposed District
Boundary
MWAT Existin y1tnlrL ~..Y~
g District
Boundary INSET
} Precinct Boundary
i~ r Precinct Split
417 22j~ ppp~J,'SA'r , I iM 1 f
ii +
fi ~
j'~' / 1
tkk ~ 1
i
R;
~ f
i w
i~
~'1
r~
I _'s
7~ i
~ ,t ~ . k ~
I
,t
li I
,r r I
~ ~ f +r i
y. Y I
f- i
~ 1
u {
~I
~i 'r 1
r' 9
i III
I 11
~ r i r ~
i
I
w
n ~ , I ~ ~ r1i F ~v-.: 41~ 1
C
l
-1"_J
_ M-1;; . J
l ,
,
;I
61j
Mal ~I 4 g _ Mom1 r a.t
'
14l T tI~I -_il
,y
4v- ~ - 4fG i
r a 4
I,
f lam- 1 I/. g -A -15'
'
l AI ~ ~ / ly I rJF ~ Wl~w _ I.
r ~
'86
ah"
n I J r
41' f:
e
412 412.
J~
f
I
k~
'V
i
1 J
r~ .3
}
4 i Y.
S'
jor s
~_~-Y
Ise 4.
1 ~ ~r 1
t ~ efS
~.}Y
:-ate
y_1.
kY' a_`f
J
.rk.,
to S
'r I
~ v
~
v
I ~i
~;e - 4YiiN1gP
'YY:97tSt
,
Mantri, Suhas, M.D. Court.2sy Ob-Gyn
4405 North I-35, #14 Dept-. of Pediatrics/Cb•Gyn
Denton, Texas 76201
382-0076
E Reappointed January, 1990
{
Marsden, Cindi, M.D. Active Ob-Gyn
2509 Scripture, #104 Dept. of Pediatrics/Ob-•Gyn
Denton, Texas 76201
382-6190
Reappointed February, 1991
Marsden, John, M.D. Active General and Vascular Surgery
FF 1300 Fulton, Suite 203 Dept. of
Surgery
j Denton, Texas 76201
387-9248
Reappointed January, 1991
May, David, M.D. Courtesy Cardiology
614 Edmonds Lane, Suite 101 Dept, of Medicine
Lewisville, Texas 75067
214/434-1988 '
Reappointed July, 1990 I
i
Midgett, William, M.D. Courtesy Gynecology
323 North Bonnie Brae Dept. of Pediatrics/ob-Gyn
Denton, Texas, 7`201
387-3583
Reappointed January, 1990
Miller, John, M. D. Courtesy Ob--Gyn
323 North Bonnie Brat Dept. of Pediatrics/Ob-Gyn
Denton, Texas 76201
387-3583
Reappointed January, 1990
Kizer, G. Lavell, M.D. Courtesy General Surgery
4401-A North I-35 Dept. of Surgery
Denton, Texas 76201
387-7588
Reappointed January, 1990
Moore, Terrence, M. D. A ''Give Family Practioe
2324 San Jacinto Blvd., #219 Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76205
565-1565
Reappointed January, 1990
Moryan, Anwar, M.D. Courtesy Endocrinology
4309 Mesa Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
566-2702
Reappointed December, 1990
11
j
f"'' n.sxue
2
Yl
fSurgery
Mosier, Curtis, M.D. Active General
1300 Fulton, #203 Dept. Surgery
Denton, Texas 76201
382-2646
Reappointed January, 1990
j
Neely, Wanda, M.D. Provisional ophthalmology
560 West Main, Suite 101-A Dept, of Surgery
Lewisville, Texas 75067
214/436-4141
Reappointed July, 1990
Nichols-Hostetter, Courtesy Radiology
Susan, M.D. Dept. of Medicine
1614 Scripture
Denton, Texas 76201
387-6159
Reappointed March, 1991
Nobles, Robert, D.O. Active Family Practice
1400 Crescent, Suite 4 Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
380-0844
Reappointed January, 1990
Norris, Jackie, M.D. Active internal Medicine
625 Dallas Drive, #400 Dept. of Medicinc f
Denton, Texas 76205
566-2242
Reappointed April, 1991
I {
Nunn, Roger, M.D. Active Ophthalmology
525-A Bryan Dept, of Surgery ;
Denton, Texas 76201 k
382-1511
Reappointed Deceber, 1989 s
Oliver, Joe, M.D. Psychiatry
~ Active f icine ~
306 North Carroll Dept. tl
Denton, Texas 76201
383-1666
Reappointed January, 1990
Patel, Jyoti, M.D. Active Psychiatry
2509 Scripture, #103-B Dept. of Medicine
Dentont Texas 76201
382-3746 or 566-4651
Reappointed January, 1990
Narenda A. Patel, M.D. Provisional Int. Med./H matology-Oncology
4308 Mesa, Suite B Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
566-4651
Appointed March, 1991
12
Y
Patterson, Thomas, M.D. Active Pediatrics
1728 Scripture Dept, of Pediatrics/Ob-Gyn
Denton, Texas 76201
i 387-3891
j Reappointed January, 1990
Perry, Franklin, M.D. courtesy ENT
651 Cross Timbers, #102 Dept. of Surgery
T,ewisville, Texas 75028
214/221-9442
ti Reappointed April, 1990
Pillow, llavid, M.D. Courtesy Emergency Medicim
8411 Preston Road, #695 Dept. of Medicine
Dallas, Texas 75225
214/373-1115
I Reappointed May, 1990
Porterfield, Rhonda, M.D. Active Pathology
HCA Denton Cam. Hose. Dept. of Surgery
207 North Donnie Brae
3 Denton, 'T'exas 76201
898-7009
Reappointed April, 1990
i Pourzan, Darius P., M.D. Active Ano-sthesiology
i P.O. Box 2402 Dept. of Surgery
Denton, Texas 76202
566-3788
1 Reappointed October, 1989
Price, David, M,D. Active ENT
4210 Mesa Drive, #8 Dept. of Surgery s
Denton, Texas 76201 j
566-6747
Reappointed February, 1990 j
ozeshi, Tanveer, M. D. Active Cardiology }
4401 North 1-351 #16 Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
566-2358
Reappointed January, 1990
r
Reed, Jain, D.D.S. courtesy oral Surgery
1300 Fulton, #402 Dept. of Surgery
Denton, Texas 76201
387-9015
Reappointed February, 1991
Reynolds, Lizabeth, M.D. Act ive Radiology
1614 Scripture, #2 Dept, of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
387-6159
Reappointed July, 1989
13
IEr:sa:+l
,V i. C~RSSft.
Rogers, Booker, M.D. Provisional Anesthesiology
4 4401-A N. I-35, #215 Dept. of Surgery
Denton, Texas 76201
j 566-4095
Reappointed March, 1991
Roosth, Joseph, M.D. Provisional Internal Medicine
2324 San Jacinto Blvd., #211 Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76205
382-7881
ti Appointed September, 1990
!~E Sacher, FAward, M.D. Courtesy urology
i 4405 North I-35 Dept. of Surgery
k Denton, Texas 76201
383-2345
+ Reappointed January, 1990
4 Sanders, Barry, M.D. Courtesy Gastroenterology
560 West Main Dept. of Medicine
Tewisville, Texas 75067
214/420-8800
Reappointed Jawary, 1990
Saraiya, Mukesh, M.D. Provisional Pulmonary Medicine/Internal
2509 Scripture, #103-A Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201 Dept. of Medicine f.
381-0971
Appointed July, 1990
Schulman, Stephen, M.D. Courtesy Pediatrics
4401-A North I-35 Dept. of Pediatrics/Ob-Gyn ;
Denton, Texas 76201
382-9448
Reappointed January, 1990 ?
Scott, Joseph, M.D. Active Family Practice {
1108 Dallas Drive, #300 Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76205
566-5010 j
Reappointed January, 1990 F
Shelton, John, M.D. Active Family Practice
2509 Scripture Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
898-7400
Reappointed January, 1990
Short, Arvin, M.D. Active General surgery
2509 Scripture Dept. of Surgery
Denton, Texas 76201
898-7400
Reappointed January, 1990
14
{
( Atk1;~.t
i
i
Sloan, Randall, D.O. Provisional Emergency Medicine
8411 Preston Road, Suite 695 Dept. of Medicine
Dallas, Texas 75225
I 214/373-1115
Appointed May, 1990
Slcmowitz, Alan, M.D. Courtesy Radiation Oncology
4610 Bobbitt Drive Dept. of Medicine
Dallas, Texas 75229-4241
. Reappointed January, 1990
Sommer, Raymond, M. D. Provisional Emergency Medicine
8411 Preston Rd., #695 Dept. of Medicine
Dallas, Texas 75225
214/373-1115
Appointed September, 1990
j Storrie, Martha C., M.D. Provisional Urology
541 West Main, #150 Dept. of Surgery
I&wisville, Texas 75067
214/420-8500
Appointed September, 1990
II Taylor, Eugene, M.D. Active Family Practioe
i 2509 Scri
11 Denton, Te as 76201 Dept. of Medicine
898-7400
j Reappointed January, 1990
Terry, Arthur, M.D. Courtesy Orthopedic Surgery
477 West Elm Dept. of Surgery
Lewisville, Texas 75067 {
214/420-1776
Reappointed April, 1990
Thamas, T. J., M.D. Crurtesy 4401-A North 1-35 Urology Surgery
Denton, Texas 76201
383-1581
Reappointed January, 1990
1
Till, Mark, M.D. Provisional Emergency medicine
8411 Preston Road, Suite 695 Dept, of Medicine t
Dallas, Texas 75225
214/373-1115
Appointed July, 1990
TmToiend-Parchman, Active Psychiatry
W. R., M.D.
Dept. of Medicine
207 West Hickory, #115
DWton, Texas 76201
383-2059
Reappointed July, 1989
15
x
TIAY?ti<Y!p
(t§9jQG1~{i7
F
Vasavada, Nishendu, M.D.
541 West Main, 0140 psychiatry
Lewisville, Texas 75067 Dept. of Medicine
214/221-1741
Reappointed July, 1990
` Velayos, BI ard, M.D. Provisional Phewmtology
4308 Mesa, Suite A Dept. Of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201 Deft. icil~e
565-0600
Reappointed January, 1991
j
j Via, Mickey, M.D. Courtesy Anesthesiology
4401 North 1-35, 0220 Dept. of Surgery
Denton, Texas 76201
566-3716
Reappointed August, 1989
Wahlert, Charles, M,D, Active Internal Medicine
2509 Scripture Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
898-7400
Reappointed January, 1990
Wasserman, Alan, M.D, Active Ob-Gyn
j 4405 North I-35, 06 Dept, of Pediatrics/Ob-cyn f
1 Denton, Texas 76201
565-1100
Reappointed November, 1989
Weinberg, Stephen, M.D.
4401-'A Active Orthopedic Sutgety
North 1-35, 0120 Dept. of Surgery l
Denton, Texas 76201 ,
566-2440
Reappointed April, 1990 {
Welch, Robert, M.D. Active r'mergency Medicine
2429 Windsor Dept, of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
Reappointed January, 1990
i
Williams, J. R., M,D. Active ERr
4210 Mesa, suite A Dept. of surgery
Denton, Texas 76201
566-5177
Reappointed January, 1990
Williamson, Richard, M. 0. Courtesy Orthopedic surgery
p.0. Box 877 Dept. of surgery
Lewisville, Texas 75067
214/420-1776
PAappointed January, 1990
26
j
f
i
P-
wilLon, Carol, M.D. Couitesy Nep logy
4309 Mesa Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
566-3993
Reappointed April, 1990
Wilson, Rick, M.D. courtesy Dermatology i
319 North Barrie Brae Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
387-0624
ti Reappointed April, 1990
Wilson, Ronald T., M.D. Provisional Obstetrics-gynecology
3 4405 I-35, Suite 8 Dept. of Pediatrics/ob-(;ym
Denton, Texas 76201
565-1100
Appointed February, 1991
Wolski, Edward, M.D. Courtesy Family Practice
1701 Broadway Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
j 566-8000
i Reappointed April, 1990
1
Yeatts, Linda, M.D. Provisional Family Practice
2324 San Jacinto Blvd., #219 Dept, of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76205
565-1565
E Appointed August, 1990
TEMPORARY PRrIIIB3ES
The following physicians have been granted tenporary privileges while their
Medical staff applications are being processed:
4
Cardioloav
Haynie, David, M. D.
614 E*wnds Lane, suite 101
Lewisville, Texas 75067
214/434.1988
Emer+yenav Medicine
Aleman, Cesar, M.D.
f 8411 Preston Road, 0695
Dallas, Texas 75225
214/373-1115
Bryce, Ronald W., M.D.
8411 Preston Road, #695
Dallas, Texas 75225
214/373-1115
Nelson, David B., M.D.
8411 Preston Road, #695
Dallas, Texas 75225
X "1
KIWI
x.
l Wilson, Carol, M.D. courtesy Nephrolo
4309 Mesa Dept, of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
1 566-3993
h Reappointed April, 1990
i
% Wilson, Rick, M.D. Courtesy Dermatology
319 North Bonnie Brae Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
387-0624
+ Reappointed April, 1990
Wilson, Ronald T., M.D. Provisional Obstetrics- pvcology
4405 1-35, Suite B Dept. of Pediatrics/Ob-Cyn
Denton, Texas 76201
565-1100
Appointed February, 1991
Wolski, Edward, M.D. Courtesy Family Practice
1701 Broadway Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76201
566-8000
Reappointed April, 1990
Yeatts, Linda, M.D. Provisional Family Practice
2324 San Jacinto Blvd., #219 Dept. of Medicine
Denton, Texas 76205
565-1565
Appointed August, 1990
Tl2PORARY PRrMIM
The following physicians have been granted temporary privileges while their
medical Staff applications are being processed:
.
gam. ll~gy
Haynie, David, M.D. ~
614 FA=' Ls Lane, Suite 101
Lewisville, Texas 75067 I
214/434-1988
Ermen'~x~5t Med1~~
Aleman, Cesar, M.D.
8411 Preston Road, #695
Dallas, Texas 75225
214/373-1115
I
Bryce, Ronald W., M.D.
8411 Preston Road, Vr56
Dallas, Texas 75225
214/373-1115
Nelson, David B., M.D.
8411 Preston Road, #695
L>allas, Texas 75225
1f X e tlla5y;ta'
i
G ATTACHMENT V
1
SANDS/NEW YORK LIFE
DENTONAEWISVILLE AREA PHYSICIAN UPDATE
- is Fmily Practice Physicians I
r
2 Pediatricians
22 Specialists
k -
_s
k t
fh
i
Note: This handout contains first Sanus' Local Medical Providers listings
distributed in 1060 and the latest list dated, SepUaibar it, 1101
i aslide.prn
1
t
Z
{ SANDS/M YORK LIPS
LOCAL MEDICAL PROVIDERS
OCTOBER 30, 1989
. HOSPITALS DOCTORS (cont'd)
HCA Denton Community James Rampoldi, M,D.
207 N, Bonnie Bree Family Practice
Denton, TX 76201 1119 Collier
(817) 898-7000 Denton, TX 76201
24-hour ER (817) 898-7006 (817) 566-2229
j
HCA Lewisville William Cudd, D.O.
500 W, Maine Street Family Practice
Lewisville, TX 75757 2412 Old North Rd.
(214) 420-1000 Denton$ TX 76201
24-Hour ER (214) 420-1410 (817) 565-0019
j
DOCTORS
Dale Jackson, M.D. Marilyn Janke, M.D.
Family Practice Pediatrics
541 W. Maine, Suite 110 1300 Fulton, Suite 501
Lewisville, TX 75057 Denton, TX 76201
(214) 436-2544 (817) 382-5466
Charles Brittle, M.D. Steve Lesons, M.D,
Family Practice Pediatrics
401 N. Stemmone 2509 Scripture
Saner, TX 76266
(817) 456-4428 Denton, 76201
(817) $98-7400
i
Gerald Balaley, M.D. Fred Cummings$ M.D. a
Ob/GYN OB/OXN E
1300 Fulton, Suite 502 2509 Scripture j
Denton, Tx 76201
(817) 381-0177 Denton, 8- 76201
(817) 898-7404
5777P
103089045
r
DENTON1LEwLSVnd,E AREA PHYS[CM UPDATE
t
&1$ mbar 18, 1991
MARY CARE
EWk Practice (Conti) . Family gartke ( on►t)
John Hosura, D.O. James McKinley, M.D. Terrence L. Moore, M.D.
1716 Scripture, Suite E 1175 Diane Circle 2324 San Jacinto, Suite 219
Denton, TX 76201 Lewisville, TX 75067 Denton, TX 76205
((817) 383-8300 ((22114) 436-7531 (817) 565.1565
X
XX
Robot Nobles, D.O. Charles C. Bittle, M.D. Linda E. Yeatts► M.D.
1400 Crescent, Suite 4 401 N. Stemmons 2324 San Jacinto, Suite 219
Denton, TX 76201 Sanger, TX 75226 Denton, TX 76205
(817) 38M W (817) 458-4428 (817) 565.1565
XX{ XX
4
t WWiam Cudd, MO: Donald Bernstein, D.O.
2412 Old North Rd., #101 1220 N. Josey Zane
nenton, TX 76201 Carrollton, Texas 75006 Elva Monto a M.D.
( 565-0019 (214) 416-6360 Dr. Y ►
2324 San Jacinto Blvd. #211
Sld Bernstein, D.O. Denton, TX 76205
James Jones, Sr. M.D. 1220 N. Josey Lane (817) 382-7881
519 Bryan St. Carrollton. Texas 75006 XX
Denton, TX 76201 (214) 416.6360
(817) 566-0074 Oo Marla Conger, M.D.
i
XX Eulogio Tan, M.D, 475 W. Elm, Suite 102
1902 Country Club Dr., #130 Lewisville, TX 75051
Louts Calo, M.D. Carrollton, TX 75006 (214) 436.2008
2324 San Jacinto, 1211 (214) 416-0596 11+W
Demon, TX 76205 S
( 382-7881 SPECIALISTS
Delores A. Corpus, M.D.
3730 N. Josey #104 OBI YN
La,'ry VcEBer, M.D. Carrollton, Texas 75007
2324 San Jacinto, 0211 (214) 492.0333 Gerald E. Balsley, M.D.
Denton, TX 76205 S 1300 Fulton Place, #502
(817) 382-7881 Denton, TX 76201
XX M. Allen Grotto D.O. (817) 381.0177
246 B Hwy 377 South XX
Dab Jackson, MA Pilot Point, TX
541 W. Main, #110 (817) 686.2254
UwlwWe, TX 75067 XX
(214) 436-2544
WW
•012/1/91 E66eative Vote
• owl .*evant vChdal wtknis inning sanus.
I
-T`- .-T.------ 7
1
P
i
[IAC. YN icon't1 Sd r
Tom Clayton, M.D. Jam Rellas, M.D.
Fred Cummings, M.D. 3118 Las Colinas Dr. John WWfam Lawson, M.D.
2515 Scripture Dr. Denton, TX 76205 8 Medical Parkway
Denton, TX 76201 81 362.0923 Plaza 2 #106
~7~ 1476 XX Dallas, TX 75234
WW S
V~crnlar ,nd Thoracic
Mkhael Burgess, M.D. James Reline, M.D. do
475 W. Elm, #100 John William Lawson, M.D.
Lewisville, TX 75067 7323 N. Josey Lane
(214) 420-1470 David Ammons, M.D. Suite 201
WW 8 Medical Parkway Carrollton, TX
h Plaza 21 #204 ww s
Leslie Avers, M.D. Dallas, TX 75234-7894
475 W. Elm. #100 (214) 620-2753
David May, M
XX P .D.
Lewisville, TX 75067
614 Edmonds Lane, Suite lOL
(214) 420.1470 2AdD MO Lewisville, Texas 75067
t WW (214) 434-1988
t € 1 c„ erv 475 West Elm #101 1VVN P
Lewisville, TX 75057
James L. Feldman, M.D.
1 4401 A North 1.35, #370 Richard Bueess, M.D.
Denton, TX 76201 500 W. Main
(817) 387-7588 Sharon Balsley, C.R.N.A.
Associates in Woman's Health Lewisville, TX 75067
1300 Fulton Place, Suite 502 (2144) 420-1031
G. Lavep Mixer, M.D. Denton, Texas 76201
4401-A North 1.35, #370 (817) 665-7776
Denton, TX 76201 Oohthabn~los:Y
( 387-7588
Wanda Neely, M.D.
Martha Storrie, M.D. 560 West Main
Curtis Moskr, M.D. 531 W. Main Suite 101-A '
1300 PAW Lewisville, TX 75057 Lewisville, TX 75067
Denton, TX 76201 14, 436-4141
(817) 382-264b) 420-8500 WWXX
XX
Kenneth Goldberg, M.D. Otortr „o !'yrigo
~vr all
4333 N. Josey We, #206
Jyotl Patel, M.D. Carrollton, TX 75010 James Albrhe, M.D.
394 4500 1422 W. Main, Suite 200
4308 Mesa Dr., Suitt B (214) Lewisville, TX 75067
Denton, TX 76201 XX S
(817) 5664651 (214) 221-2033
WW
XX
• Only among existing patients joining Sinus. 2
t
r
f
r'
cmatol 1 olan
;z Dave A3N, M.D.
4401-A I-35 North, Suite 1240
Denton, TX 76201
(817) 3824060
XX
a Internal Medicine
Jackie Nor h, M.D.
625 Dallas Dr., Suite 375
1 Denton, TX 76205
(817) 566-2242
XX WW
I
j Or>tho lc Sur!_,,ea
James HeerwaQtn, M.D.
477 West P.lm
Lewisville, TX 75067
(214) 420-1776
WW
Mukesh C. Saralya, M.D.
2509 Scripture, Suite 103-A
Denton, TX 76201
(817) 381-0971
XX
HOSPITAL PRIVILLWFS; x
XX: HCA Denton
I Community
WW: HCA Lewisville
Memorial
S: Trinity
P: Dedman, R. H.
Memorial
T~__ _
"i l1j,yV~~1
C
i
i
INS92A.WK1 PROJECTED ATTACHMENT E
10/16/91 1991/92
rev: 10/17/91 HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS
ALTERNATIVES
SAVINGS ADDITIONAL
} FUND iAUTHORIZEDiSANUS/N.Y.LIFE*l PALICO** + , TOTAL BUDGET i AMOUNTS
;POSITIONS 12 MONTHS ; 12 MONTHS ; 12 MONTHS ;FOR DEC 191
(OCT 91-SEP 92)1(007 91-SEP 92)i(OCT 91-SEP 92)iTRANSITION
j: GENERAL i 612 , $1,088,886 4 $1,041,423 , $41,462
RECREATION ; 3 ; $6,380 ; $61102 $278
I { t
$287,408 ~ $13,099
ELECTRIC , 141.3 , $300,607 ,
y' WATER/WASTE WATER ; 120.6 ; $2680484 ; $2460304 ; $11,180
SANITATION 61.6 ; $109,627 $104,763 ; $4,774 ; I
WORKING CAPITAL ; 20 ; $42,636 ; $40,681 ; $1,864
1 1 I 1 I
GRANT POSITIONS ; 6 , $10,634 ; $10,170 ; $464
----°--_-_--_-i.,--------------i---------------i-_----_--
TOTAL ; $63.4 ; $10814,961 ; $1,736,841 ; $7911i0 ; $11,119
' '---------------i---_-----------~-------_--- f
TOTAL SAVINGS $67,991 i
*$ANUS/N.Y. LIFE ALTERNATIVE - 3 months 0 $171.01 per employee per month;
9 months ! $179.30 per employee per month
**PALICO ALTERNATIVE - 3 months f $171.01 per employee per month
with Sanus/N.Y. Life; then, 9 months 0 $169.00 per employee per month
with Philadephia American
+ Philadephia American Life Insurance company
s
5
. ;
,:,:u <,n.A.ri...Rw.<uM..,VS:fu!z8tu a. ra vu,hw-..
%
i,-
INS92A.WK1 ATTACHMENT E
10/13/91 1991/92
REV: 10/17/91 HEALTH INSURANCE BUDGET
(DOT 1, 1991 - SEP 30, 1992)
FUND ;AUTHORIZED; BUDGET ; BUDGET ; TOTAL BUDGET
;POSITIONS ; 3 MONTHS* ; 10 MONTHS** ; (12 MONTHS)
(OCT-DEC, 91) '(DEC 91-SEP 92)i(OCT 91-SEP 92)
ry
GENERAL ; 512 ; $262,871 ; $826,214 ; 4100881886
! RECREATION ; 3 ; $1,639 ; 441841 ; $69380
ELECTRIC ; 141.3 ; $72,491 ; $229,016 ; $300,507
_j WATER/WASTE WATER ; 120.6 ; $61,871 ; $194412 ; $266948b
A
SANITATION ; 61.6 ; $26,421 ; $83,106 ; $109,627
WORKING CAPITAL ; 20 ! $10,261 ; $32,274 ! $42,636
' GRANTS ; 6 ; $2,666 ; $8,069 ; $10,634
I'----------j--------------- ---j----------_-__-I
TOTAL ; 853.4 ; $437,820 ; $1,377,132 ; $1,814,961
.
* 3 months 0 $171.01 per employee per month
9 months 4 $179.30 per employee per month, and does not include 9 1
j new fire fighters positions budgeted from June 1992
i
f
I l i
1b1~h1~~`
,
f
IN-
~VI.A.
3
Attachment E
INS92A.WK1 HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM
10/16/91 DECEMBER, 1991 COSTS ESTIMATES
rev; 10/17/91 30 DAY COVERAGE EMPLOYEES & DEPENDENTS
CATEGORY NUMBER CURRENT NEW
RATE RATE DIFFERENCE TOTAL
k
HMO ONLY (3%)
{ EMP ONLY 82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EMP + SPOUSE 31 97.03 102.72 6,89 176.30
EMP + CHILD 4 38.34 41.68 3.32 179.41
F EMP + FAMILY 74 159.67 167.88 8.21 607.70
241- 135.60 139.29 3.69 889.07
Sub-Total 1,862.49
SANUS PLUS (8%)
i
5 EMP ONLY 337 2.44 13.26 10.82 31846.34
EMP + SPOUSE 29 184.67 210.07 26.40 736.80
EMP + CHILD 127 86.46 103.98 17.63 2,226.31
EMP + FAMILY 21 307.81 343.06 36.24 140.04
614 179.36 163.09 3.73 15917.22
Sub-Total 90266.61
TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST - DECEMBER, 1991 611,119.00
December, 1991 transition, 3% H140 increase & 8% Sanus Plus increase
amounts cover City Increase for Employee Only & additional amounts ;
h for dependent covereage during December only
1
I ~
j s
.
r 1 4
r
• . .u,. s.. ~ sC. r: iii.k.JN!Vw n.: rr. -.e
T7.
i
ry r
r '
I
AMahment r
aeon fM*W Part"
l3uiN 1010
k~Aae, Urtae 960sS7N1
SAWS
e20-0Sye
ANownWhLNC VOnY (711 171at) N1tM*6)
s/Wus ium MuurTH PLAN, W.
i
October 8, 1991 j
Mr. Dave Palatiere
j Coopers do Lybrand
1999 Bryan Street
suite 3000
Dallas, TX 75201
RE: City of Denton
Dear Dave: '
i
The purpose of this letter is to provide rates for our enhanced proposal should the City elect to
continue wlth Sinus, extend the current program through 12/31191 and implement the new Sam i'
plan 111/92.
This revision includes the increased major medical benefits, two year rate guarantee, and
includes compliance to House Bill 2.
Should the City elect to terminate Sinus to implement the altemate plan but desire to extend the
current program through 12/31/91, we will extend for that period for the following premium
increase:
SanusPlus + 896
HMO Only + 396
Please 1e sale know if you need any additional information.
Sincerely,
We Heerwagen
senior Group Sales Representative a
LH:vb
cc: Ike Obi, City of Denton
Tom Unck, City of Denton
Candy Rudy, Sinus
DOMOMIFOr1 Wodh + Nowbn M WO • MOAnd MiMUd NOW .bney Now York Virginia r W&OMngw 0,0.
A $ANUS CORP. COMPANY A#jhafed WA NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
` %r'd1u.Se{
lrN:d.U
G
f
i
PPMOSED SCHEDULE ATTACI "T 0
HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM
PHILADELPHIA AMERICAN LIFE
o City Cowroil Work SeesiOh Oct. 22
- Staff Reccsmiendation
,f
o Terminate Contract with Sanus t Oct. 23 - 26
Arrange Extention of /,'ontract with
Sanus for December l"I
o Finalize Contract NOV. i
Philadelphia American
o City Council Final Approval Nov. b
- Philadelphia Mariam Contract
o Finalize Adsinistrative Details Nov. 12
- Payroll Changes e.t.c
- Employee Cammiunincation Planning
a open Enrollment Nov. 18 - Dec. 13
- Employee Communication
f ;
o Employee Deduction Changes Dec. If - Dec. 31
o New Plan Effective Date Jan. t, left
?
bfitspla.prn
i -A
T_.
yjya. ~.~tra
f
l`
1
OCT 41991
GAF 1Ce ,
Denton Police Derar tment
221 N. ELM
DENTON, TEXAS 76201
M E M O R A N D U M
f. TO: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager
FROM: Michael W. Jez, Chief of Police j
DATE: October 3, 1991
I RE; Private Property Accidents s ,
1
Rick,
As you know, since the inception of the Community Oriented Policing program we ~E4
have asked our Patrol Officers to assume a myriad of new duties, among them are I
increased foot patrols and the most recent bicycle patrols.
An essential part of the Community Oriented Policing program is to constantly
review what the police do and make decisions regarding the appropriateness of
their activities. As a result of this review process I am suggesting that the Department change its existing policy regarding the investigation of
motor-vehicle
accidents which occur on private property.
Eventhough the law does not require peace officers to investigate such accidents
we currently investigate approximately 600 such accidents each year.
r1 am convinced that the man hours used for this purpose could be more effectively.
used in pursuit, of the Community Oriented Policing endeavor, In addition, there
are a number of other agencies in the Metroplex that no longer investigate private
property vehicular accidents. Among them are:
1. Dallas
2. Mesquite
3. Arlington
4, Richardson
5. Garland
6. North Richland Hills
7. Euless
8. Hurst
9. Bedford I
10. Carrolltun
I would however, continue to require investigations in cases where the private
t
(817) 688.8181 METRO 434.2620
r
iAi'A18YA2
Yd" '
~?7 a, L'3StYPT H
1
i
rX
_2_
v
f
property accident:
1. Was a hit and run
2. Involved bodily injury
3. Involved DWI
4. Resulted in an assault
n
Otherwise, the police would respond to the scene and instruct the vehicle operatore
to exchange information and complete "blue Forma".
t Initially, I expect there would be some opposition from local insurance agents
because they have come to rely on the peace officers report as a matter of 1
handling their claims. However$ I think the policy change is in the best interest ~
of the community at large,
Respectfully,
1 •
c~ae J
Chief of e
F
i
i
E
r
4., 1
1
}
DATEt 10/22/91
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMA'S
TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROMt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECTt SIGN ORDINANCE
5
sty' COMME NDAT ION t
i
This is a briefing item. P&Z is scheduled to make a recommendation on
October 23, 1991. A proposed schedule followat
i
Propocad Schedule
October 20, 1991 Notice of Council public hearing and
ordinance consideration ad Pppeare in
newspaper,
October 22, 1991 Council holds work session.
October 23, 1991 P&Z holds public hearing and
considers ordinance.
November 51 1991 Council holds public hearing and
considers ordinance.
SUMMARY 1
p&Z will consider an ordinance amending the sign ordinance to add a
temporary use permit provision and amend the variance criteria. See
Attachment 1.
The temporary use permit would allow a legally none-conforming ground
I sign to be altered so long as the sign became no more non-oonforming, t
The Planning and Zoning commission will be considering at their meeting
t on October 23, 1991, the duration of the temporary use permit and/or f
establishing a future date for which a temporary use permit could not
be issued. A bond or escrow equal to the cost of removal would be
` posted with the temporary use permit, guaranteeing removal. The permit L
would be reviewed annually.
The new variance criteria combines and clarifies existing criteria and
may provide a measure of increased discretion for the sign board of
Appeals.
In Attachment 2 ere other city standards and example variance
criterios.
BACKGROUNDt
The Planning and Zoning Commission was struck by the fact that 37 new,
conforming signs were permitted to replace non-conforming signs during
the first nine months of 1991. See Attachments 3 and 4.
i
i
k
A 0 r tl`P StG 3T
i
}
t
1
i
City council Report
October 22, 1991
Page 2
pRnnnn15 DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS F C Di
F Code Enforcement.
Current ground sign owners, Planning,
rrraCA?- IMPACTt
Pees will be charged to recoup the cost of this new Procedure.
t
f Re a 11 subm t
Icy Harrell
city manager
t
APprov
Fran H. Rob na, Op
Executive Director
planning and Development
AXX00041
t
i
t
f
~i
it
I ,
,1
T _
,v
ATTACHMENT 1
' ORDINANCE NO.
i
DRAFT
i
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING THE SIGN REGU-
LATIONS OF CHAPTER 33 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO ALLOW THE TEM-
PORARY USE OF A SIGN THAT REPLACES OR ALTERS A NONCONFORMING GROUND
SIGN; PROVIDING FOR PERMIT PROCEDURES AND REQUIRING SECURITY TO IN-
SURE COMPLIANCE; AMENDING THE CRITERIA FOR RECEIVING A VARIANCE AND
ALLOWING THE SIGN BOARD OF APPEALS TO IMPOSE CONDITIONS; PROVIDING
FOR A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the present sign ordinance prohibits the replacement
or alteration of a nonconforming sign unless the replaced or al-
tared sign complies with existing regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended
that the sign regulations be amended to allow a. property owner to
j temporarily use a sign that replaces or ;alters a nonconforming
ground sign; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended
that the criteria for granting a variance from the sign regulations
{ be amended; NOW, THEREFORE;
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 2. That Division 5 ("Temporary Signs") of Chapter 33
of the Code of Ordinances is amended by adding a new section 33-213
to read as follows:
Sec. 33-213. Replacing or ;Altering Nonconforming
i Ground Signs.
This section allows a property owner to replace or alter
a nonconforming ground sign and make use of the new or
altered sign until January 1, 199_,, without conforming
the sign to the regulations of this Chapter.
(a) Permitting Requirements.
(1) Permit. An owner may replace or alter a non-
conforming ground sign and make use of the new or al-
tered sign by receiving a temporary use permit from
the City. The permit may only be issued to the owner
of the real property where the sign is located. The
permit shall apply to all signs on one supporting
structure. Other signs on the same supporting struc-
ture may also be replaced or altered and used under
the same permit. No temporary use permit shall be
issued for an abandoned or illegal sign or an aban-
doned supporting structure.
4
1
A:
T_
i
t
(2) Fee, security, and Agreement. To receive a tempo-
rary use permit, the property owner must submit the
application and fee along with a bond payable to the
City, on a form provided by the city, or a cash de-
posit in lieu of the bond, to cover the cost of re-
moval, transportat;,on, and disposal of the sign. The
amount of the bond or deposit shall be determined by
the City. The property owner must also agree, in
writing, to remove the sign upon expiration of the
permit.
(3) Transfer. The permit may be tr°nsferred to a new
i property owner upon payment of a transfer fee and the
receipt of a new bond and agreement executed by the
new owner.
G
(4) Duration. A temporary use permit shall be valid
for one year, renewable prior to expiration, for ad-
ditional one year terms, but all temporary use permits
shall expire on January 1, 199_,_. If the sign cov-
ered by a temporary use permit is abandoned, the per-
mit expires on the date of abandonment.
(5) Work Permit. The work performed to replace or al- r
ter a sign under a temporary use permit must be per- I
formed pursuant to a 180-day permit as required by
this Chapter, but no work permit shall be valid beyond
the expiration date of the temporary use permit.
(b) Regulations for Use, A sign covered by a temporary
use permit must have the same effective area, height, and
shape and be placed in the same location ac the sign it
replaces or alters and cannot be more nonconforming than
the sign it replaces or alters. The new or altered sign
f must make use of the same supporting structure as the
sign it replaces or alters, without replacement or alter-
ation of the supporting structure.
(c) Rempval. The property owner shall either remove the
sign covered by a temporary use permit or alter it to
conform to the requirements of this Chapter within thirty
(30) days of the date the temporary use permit for that
sign expires.
(d) Conflicts. The provisions of this section shall con-
trol over any other conflicting provisions of this chap-
ter.
PAGE 2
i
VA.
1
I
I
SECTION II. That section 33-65 (a) of Division 3 of Chapter
33, as amended by Ordinance No. 91-048, is further amenried to read
as follows:
Sea. 33-65. Duration.
(a) around or Attached Signs. Except as otherwise pro-
vided in this Chapter, a permit issued for a ground or j,
attached sign shall. terminate 180 days after issuance.
SECTION III. That the annual fee for the temporary use permit
authorized by section 33-213 shall be $
I
SECTION IV. That the fee for transferring a permit from one
t property owner to another as authorized by section 33-213 shall be
SECTION V. That Chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances, as
amended by ordinance number 90-182, is further amended by amending
I paragraph 4 (c) and (d) of Section II of Ordinance No. 90-182,
i relating to variances, to read as follows:
4. Variances to the Sign Regulations.
(c) The Board may grant a variance from a require-
ment of this chapter if it finds all the following exist:
(2~ he varianee- s neeeseary beeause-of a--unique
ee%ditlen er feature e€ the property general!
eommen to the other preperties.
(1) Literal compliance with the sign regulation would
cause an unnecessary hardship because the property has
a unique condition or feature that is not generally
common to other properties,
(2) The granting of the variance will not violate the
spirit or the intent of the ordinance; and
(3) The condition or feature which creates the need
for the variance did not result from 'the property
ownerts acts.
j
PAGE 3
j
L
!
I
i
(d) The Board shall not grant a variance to any applicant
solely for personal convenience, financial hardship, or other rea-
sons ufirelated to the property. If the board grants a variance,
r` the variance shall be granted only to the extent that is reasonably
necessa;-y to remedy the hardship. The board may impose conditions
relating to the use of the sign for t<<hioh a variance is grw.,ted.
SECTION VI. The provisions of this ordinance are separable,
I and the invalidity of any phrase or part of this ordinance shall
not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remainder of the
ordinance.
i
SECTION V.U. That ,any person violating any provision of this
ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding !
$2,000. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated
shall constitute a separate and distinct offense.
SECTION VIII. That this ordinance shall become effective
fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City
Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance
to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official
newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the
date of its passage. f
4 PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1991.
i
I i
BOB CASTLES ERRY, MAYOR
ATTESTS
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY 1
4
{
BY.
j
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
!
I
BY:
AXX00049/AL'L00033
a
f PAGE 4
Y
PIN, 13,m,
Al'rACHMENT 2
"FACE CHANGE" AND VARIANCE SIGN MATRIX
Revised 8/91
city I Face Chan a Abilit j Sian Board and Criteria Required
I The ordinance language I The Sign Review Board of Appeals consists of
I Addison I is about the same as I three or more members of the City Couucil,
I Denton's, City officialsl The Board has the authority to adopt reason-
I l told us that face changesl able rules and regulations. The filing fee
I are allowed when the I is $200.00. The Board may consider appeals
I 1 business is under the I on the basis that auch regulations and/or
I same ownership. When a l standards will, by reason of exceptional or
new business moves in, I "meritorious" circumstances constitute a
II I the existing sign must I practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship.
I meet the new standards. 16-10 cases go before the Board each year. Of I
l i I these cases, 70% of the requests will be
I I I granted. The Board considers the aesthetics
l of the sign when considering the variance.
II (See Attachment A).
i j
I Does not allow face The Zoning Board of Adjustment hears all sign
Arlington l changes on non-conformiagj related cases. The Board consists of five
I I signs. unless the sign j members and four alternates with two year
I meets the new ordinance l terms, Meetings for the Board are once a
j standards. l month. The filing fee is $200-00. There are
I two ways to go before the board. One would
I be for a special exception (usually
topog- raphy) and the other would be for a variance.
I Special exception cases are usually approved`
when hardship is shown but variances are not
' I as easily approved. No criteria is required
I II I to grant variances, The criteria required for
special exceptions ist 1) that the requested
j I I exception will establish only those usea per-
mitted under the ordinance; 2) that the loca-
l l I tion of proposed activities and improvements
L J l I clearly defined on a acts plan filed by the I s
l I j applicant; and 3) that the exception will be I
j I I wholly compatible with the use and permitted ( r
I development of adjacent properties either as I
I I I filed or subject to such requirements as the t
I I I Board may find necessary to protect and main- I
I told the stability of adjacent properties. l
+ II (See Attachment B). I
l
Allows face change on j The Board of Appeals consists of five members l
I i Carrollton l signs owned by add ad- I with two alternate members. All serve two I
I vertising the same I year terms. The Board meets once a month and l
I I business. If another I hears approximately ten cases a year. Many i
l business is advertised l of Carrollton's sign reviews are related to l
I the sign must than come I retail business requests for pole"signs along I
Into compliance. The I I-35 (pole signs are not allowed on 1-33, oalyl
t l Board may, upon request, I monument signs). The fee is $100.00 The
allow an increase in the I Board cannot grant a variance unless there is I
i + height and/or size. no other alternative of literal enforcement i
2237% - I
Y
i
t~.~• 1 rr~tvue
1
Jlgn ..",.r •tx
Page 2
City I Face Change Ability I Sign Board and Criteria Required
Carrollton l SEE PAGE ONE I of the ordinance that would not result in an
(continued) I l unnecessary hardship. In order to grant a
+ I variance, the Board shall finds a) The
I I requested variance does not eliminate any
E + I I requirement of this ordinance and does not
I allow any prohibited signs, b) The hardship
b i I is not in any way the result of the appli-,
cant's own action, and c) The hardship is
I peculiar to the property of the applicant and
I I l not due to the general conditions of the
I I neighborhood, Economic gain or lose shall
I I I never be sufficient grounds for the finding
I of a hardship or the granting of a variance.
1 i + (See Attachment C).
Allows face changes on I The Board of Adjustment consists of five
f I Corinth I existing ~ I signs as tong ;
I members and two alternates that each serve
I I I as the existing struc- l two year terms. The Board meets once a month
I ture is not obstructing I and hears between twelve and fifteen cases a
I traffic visability and I year, The board is the last process for
I is not altered in size I appeal and requires a fee of $10.00, No
or height. I criteria 1,a required for the Board to grant
I a variance, though extenuating circumstances
t I I circumstances are considered.
2 l
t
Dallas I Does not allow face I Sign issues were originally heard by the Sign
I changes on non-conforming) Control Board of Appeals until the Board was
I signs unless the sign I merged with the Zoning Board of Adjustment.
I I conforms to the ordinancel The Zoning Board of Adjustment consists of
standards. Since the l five members and three alternate members that
t I I zoning has changed on I each serve two year terms, There must be a
I several sites where I vote of four out of five of the members to
I con-conforming signs I approve the variance, The Board has the
are located the city I authority to grant a lOX increase in the
will give the sign owner I height, setback and/or the number of words
ten years to make the ! allowed on the sign for a maximum of two extras
I sign come into conform- I words, The current ordinance limits the ! 4
I I anee. l number of words to eight, The Board has the f
I authority to grant a variance on a sign erect-1
I ed prior to April 1973 to 1) Extend the period)
of time allowed by this article for the owner I
l I I of a sign to recoup his investment when, from
I l the evidence presented to the Board finds that)
I a ten year period is insufficient for the
l i I owner of a sign to fully recover his invest- l
I ment in the signs 2) For a detached nan- l
f premise sign of up to 202 of the setback, l
I effective area, and height requirements of I
! this article= 3) for detached premise signs J
Jx/2 l I
5 1
k
1. `
1
4
Sign Matrix
Page 3
City I Face Change Ability I Si n Board and Crj'oria Required
Dallas I SEE PAGE TWO ) of up to 25% of the setback, effective area,
E (continued) I J and height requirements of this article.
4) Authorize one additional detached sign on
l a premise in excess of the number permitted by
I I 1 this article; 5) Authorize up to two addi-
tional larger letter words on an attached sign
l in excess of the number permitted by this
I article; For a sign that was erected after
April, 1973 the Board has the authority to
t ? I grant variances in the following circumstan-
I I I cast 1) for a detached premise signs of up to
110% of the setback, effective area, and height
l requirements; 2) one additional detached
l premise sign on a premise in excess of the
I number permitted; and 3) up to two additional
l large letter words on an attached sign.
The fee to go before the Board depends on the t'
value of the sign. For examples .
j I VALUE COST x
I $ 1.0-0-77 11000 $ 17..00
I I I $ 10001 - $ 50000 $ 300.00
I~ I I I $ 59001 - $ 20,6OO 500.00
II I $ 20,001 - $ 50,000 $ 900.00
I I $ 500001 - $200,000 $1,300.00
$200,001 - and up $2,000.00+'
I There is also a $10.00 fee for a stake sign
that is required to be posted at the site of l
the proposed sign. Very few cases go J
I I before the board as it is very restrictive.l
(See Attachment D).
I:
I i Changing the face of an I The Zoning Board of Adjustment and Appeals l
l Grand Prairie I existing sign is allowed I consists of five members and four alternates l
I as long as the height l that each serve two year terms. The Board I
I I and effective area of i meets once a month and at which time ua;ually l
I I the sign are not altered I hears four to five cases. On the average, thel
I I in any way. If altered, I board hoars approximately fifty cases a year I
it must conform, l pertaining to signs. The board is also l
responsible for hearing variances on toning l
I cases. Variances are limited to size, height,}
I spacing and lighting. Special exceptions are l
limited to allow additional signs per streot l
frontsgs. The Board may grant variances based)
I on the aesthetics of the sign but must find ff
I all of the following exist for special exeep- l
tiones a) the property must have a minimum ofl
J I 1300 feet of frontage along a public street; l
b) any additional sign(s) on the prestige aunt I
ex /3
I
~ r
r:
j
rr.
Jil;4.t6.i.'y~
([l7pY~'y
'LYSt1 ag
J l~'jN iW 4L 1. .
Page 4 t
City I Face Change Abilitq Sign Board and Criteria Required
l
I Grand Prairie I SEE PAGE THREE I relate to the same single business as the
(continued) I l existing sign(s); c) any additional sign(s)
l must comply with all required setback(s)I and
any additional sign(s) will not block any
l other signs on adjacent property. The Board
l usually £ollowa the staff recommendation for
I I both special exceptions and variances.
(See Attachment E).
l Complete face changes I The Board of Zoning Adjustment consists of
Grapevine I are allowed only with I five active members and two alternate members
l a permit. Changes made I who are appointed for two year terms. The
l to the sign other than I Board meets once a month and usually hears
j 1 l just to the face requireel three to five cases a month. On the average,
1 that the sign come into 136 - 60 cases are heard a year. The fee to
conformance. 1 go before the board is $100.00. The Board has }
I limited power on exceptions and/or variances.
I I I They have the authority to grant exceptions
and/or variances in cases that show hardship. 3
I The Board must find that a special condition
i I I exists, by a vote of the members, before the a
l variance can be considered. On the average, I
l l the Board grants 80 - 85% of the eases the go I
before it. I r
j I I II
I~
' I Allows face changes as I Sign cases are heard by the City Council. I
Irving I long as no alterations I Cases rarely go to the Council as the depart- I
l I of the sign "can" or I ment and the City Manager try to alleviate
structure are changed. l the problems internally. On the average, one
l Permits are required to I came will go to the City Council in a three I
I l I be obtained prior to l month period. There is a $100.00 filing I
I changing the fact. I fee. Proof of hardship must be shown foe's I
I variance to be granted. Thera is no criteria
l other than proof of hardship.
(See Attachment F).
I I
I Allows a change of I Sign cases are handled throw h the City
l Lewisville I copy or message on I Council. The filing fee is 1100.00. TILa
legally established I Council has the authority to allow exceptions I
1 l signs only. No other I and/or variances for any part of the sign or
1 { alterations are allowed I site. On the average, 15-20 comes are heard
I l on the sign unless it I each year by the Council. The Council is veryl
I 1 conforms to the current f strict and usually only approves two out of 1
I l standards. I twenty cases. Council asks that staff handle 1
{ 1 most sign problems at an administrative level.l
I I l Staff uses the intent of the ordinance to welll
I l as their best judgment in working with indi-
l I viduala.
x
I
i
k
R
f
I r
1
Sign MJtrl%
Page 5
City I Face Change Ability f Sin Board and Criteria Required
Does not allow face J The Zoning Board of Adjustment hears zoning
Lubbock I change unless the sign I cases as well as sign cages, The Board may
I I is in compliance with I grant a special exception or variance if the
f I the existing ordinance I Board of Adjustment findst 1) That the grant
standards. I of such exception will not be detrimental to
J I to the public, 2) that the exception will
not be substantially or permanently injurious
f I I to thu neighborhood, 3) that the granting
f will be in harmony with the intent of the
I I the ordinance, and 4) in determining its
I I I findings, the Board will take other items
I account. The filing fee is $75,00.
f 1 I Approximately 15 - 20 cases are heard each
year and 90% of the requests are approved.
(See Attachment G).
I I Allows face changes. I Plano has a seven member sign board that meet '
I Plano I On April 22, 19919 there I monthly and hears approximately six requests
I I was a change in admini- I per hearing. The filing fee coat is $65.60.
I I strative policy to allow I All case sites and environs are video taped
face change on non-con- I for the board's review. If a board denies a
I I forming signs as long as f request for variance, the same request cannot
f f I the height and size of I be requested for two years after ~;he data of
I the sign is not altered. I denial. The board wannot grant a variance if
I I the variance conflicts with the spirit of the
I I ordinance, which is one of providing public
j I I safety, adequate lighting, provisions for oper
space and air, conservation of land, protee- j'
tion of property and encouraging the highest
I I I and best use of the land, Plano's sigtt reviet
I I I board has been in place for approximately ten
I I I years. The following are criteria £or grant-
in a variancet 1) Deeree of variance, E
t J I 12) Reason for variance, 3) Location of vari-
ance, 4) Duration of variance requested,
I I 1 5) Effect on public safety, 6) Protection of I
I f J neighborhood property, 7) Degree of neighbor- i
I I I hood property, and 8) Effect of the variance
I I on the general plan of regulating signs with-
in the City. On the avarsss, sixty cases go
I I I before the Board each year with approximately
I I I thirty cases being approved.
(See Attachment H).
J I Allows face changes as f Richardson ham a sign board of review which
Richardson I long as the effective I is comprised of fnur voting members and two
F I I area of the sign does I alternates. City Council reviews the deci-
f I not change. I sions of the sign board, but the sign board's
I I decision is final. This board has been in
effect for approximately fifteen years and
i Jx
I ~
4
ire AYN14Wi.~y
I t(t{{a~({j
14'•1 1d7GtEr
ti
Page 6 F({rn~¢j$
City I Face Chaa a Abilitq I Si n Board and Criteria Required
Richardson I SEE PAGE FIVE meets monthly. The number of cases the board
(continued) i I hears varies widely from year to year. Some
mouths there are no cases to be heard, and
other months they may hear as many as ten
cases-. As many as one hundred cases have beiin
I I I considered in a single year. The filing fee
I I is $25.00. The Board considers each request
for the sign on its own merits. No staff -
I I recommendation is made. On the average, 100
I I I cases go before the board each year with
I I I approximately 75 percent of the cases being ;
I approved. (See Attachment i).
I I I
Allows face charigee on I Rowlett'e sign ordinance allowing for a sign
Rowlett non-conforming'eigns. board has only been in effect since September
1989. There is no history available to date.
There is currently no fee for sign board
review. the following criteria are considered
I for granting a variance& 1) Degree of the
I variance, 2) Reason for the variance request,
i
3) Location for the variance requested,
1 } 4) Duration of the requested variance
5) Effect on public safety, 6) Protection - I
I of neighborhood property, 7) Degree of hard I
ship or injustice involved, and 8) Effect I
s , I I on general plan for signing within the gener-
p I al plan for signage within the city.
(See Attachment J.)
i ? I I ,
Non-conforming sign I The Zoning Commission hears all appeals and I
San Marcos I faces can be changed as I variances. The Zoning Commission consists I
long as the structure } of seven members with two alternates who I
is not altered or the I each serve two year terms. The filing fee I
effective area enlarged. I is $75.00. The Board meets once a month and I
has the authority to grant any type of
variance. In determining a variance request, I
I the Board shall consider any evidence offered I
I I which shows or demonstrates 1) that the I
I purposes of advertising will be defeated I
I I I without a variance to the requirements of the I
} I saetion and/or 2) that the business in I
question has no reasonable means available to I
it to attract business other than the means f
i I for which the variance is requested.
Il I I i (See attachment K.)
s I I W
2 x
I
1
/`ILJL)ivwlV
ATTACHMENT A PAGE 1 3
four such signs per lot, the total effective area of which may not exceed thirty-six (36)
square feet. Such signs shall be removed as soon as tire propcirty (u which they refer has
been sold, OR 75 PEACENF rcntod or leased or for a Period of 18 months fron3 the date
of the first oertlflcate of ocerIpanny ur e, sign perrnit i~: roqulrod, v,101ch ever occurs flrst.
i
Sec. 14.135. Monument Signs,
A free-standing sign having a low prollle and made of stone, concrete, metal, routed
wood planks or beards, brick or similar materials, Including Individual lettering, which
repeat or harmonize with the architecture of the establishment It serves. Monument signs
must be built on a monument base as opposed to a pole base. A monument sign con.
l
tains only the name, logo, address and product or service of the establishment. No adver.
Using or promotional information Is permitted thereon. Such sign may be single or
double-faced Such signs and base shall not exceed six (6) feet in overall height above
y the natural or average grade and the actual rlo r face shall not exceed 48 square feet in
area per side. one monument sign per adjoining street will be allowed. Brightly colored
can signs made of plastic or smlllar materials snail not be considered as monument
signs. A minimum setback of twenty (20) feet from the public right-of-way is required.
Sec, 14.136, Temporary Construction Signs.
Permission Is granted to developers to erect temporary construction signs designed to
Identify contractors, ffnancler, architects, engineer, and to advertise the coming of new
business on the premises the sign pertains to. Such signs shall not be erected prior to
the Issuance of the 8ullding Permit of the project the sign pertains to, and must be
removed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Such signs shall comply
l with the provisions of this chapter with the exception that no sign shall contain morn
than ONE HUNDRED SQUARE FEET in effective area. In the case of residential develop.
E ment, such signs shall be allowed until 75% of the residential lots have been sold or 18
months after the Issuance of the first certificate of occupancy,
j Sec. 14136.1, Signs on Undeveloped Property,
Specifically limited to real estate, development and/or temporary constructlon signs must
comply with sign design and size criteria as set forth elsewhere within this ordinance.
See. 14.136.2. Aircraft traffic signs.
Aircraft traffic signs are exempt. -
Sec. 14.137. Procedures for a Meritorlous Exception,
(1} In the development of these criteria, a primary objective has been the ensuring
against the kind of slgnage that has led to low visual quality. On the other hand, an
equally primary objective ilas been the guarding against signage over control,
't
,
f
t
t
i
y~e
.,crce; vrafut;O hl0ult Urqutanct 123 i .
P
i
for-Sale or For-Lease Graphics, The model ordinance does not limit t
the size of these graphics but a community may want to do so. Size zi
limits should vary depending on the area in which a for•sa]e or for,
lease graphic is displayed. For-sale or for-lease graphics should not
exceed 24 square feet in commercial, industrial, and institutional
areas and should not exceed six square feet in residential areas, j
Teunporary C'ortstruction Graphics. The model ordinance does not
limit the size of these graphics because they are temporary, A corn-
f munity may wish to impose size limits,
Direcdona.( Graphics, The definitions section defines a directional
graphic as a street graphic that provides information for the con,
venfence of the public, such as information about exits, entrances,
and parking lots. A directional graphic may be any type of graphic,
such as a ground graphic or a graphic posted on a pole. e
Toe exemption applies only to directional graphics less than six
square feet in area. Letters more than three,Inches high on direc-
tional graphics are counted against the ►items of Information `
allowance.
SECTION 1.15.
I
VARIANCES (OPTIONAL) ~
1. The (name of agencyl may grant variances from the regulations i
contained in this ordinance;
(a) To permit a setback for a street graphic that is less than the
required setback, and
(h) To permit the area or height of a street graphic to be increased j
by up to 23 percent of the maximum height or area allo%yed• i I
1, The (name of agency( may grant a variance authorized by this
Section if it finds there am special physical conditions that; i
(a) Are due to the exceptional narrowness, shallowness, shape,
} or topography of the premises on which an activity is located, `
and'
i
t.; (b) Prevent the activity from earning a reasonable return as corn, t
pared with other activities in the area.
Commentary
Some street graphics ordinances include a provision for variances,
The model ordinance Includes an optional variance provision to In dicate how such a provision might be drafted, and is based on the y'
Page 1
` 1
(
` i
I
124 Street Graphics And the Lam
Columbus, Ohio, and Wilmington, North Carolina, street graphics
A variance provision is not necessary. The provisions
ordinances' for Graphics provide ads- i
for Areas of Spedai Control and Programs
the street graphics :Ontrol
! quate flexibility in the administ,i+i
system.
The dsaPdng of a variance provision presents a number of prob-
lems. Most zoning enabling legislation is based on the Standard Ton
which contains detailed provisions for varian,:es,
ing Enabling Act, i '
inn grant variances is deiegated to the zoning board
authority ct
Of adjustment, Most cases hold that a zoning ordinance may not
modify the provisions for variances contained in 9the 82 nabling legis•
lation, See D. Mandelker, Land roUse U
blemwb not including the street
! A community can avoid this p Y
graphics ordinance in the zoning ordinance. Home rule communi•
ties In some states may ordinance becausettheytrcan modify the
dinance In the zoning
provisions of the enabling hgislation under their home rule powers,
See D, Irfandelker, Land Use firs, § 4.28 (1982). area, and setbacks
! Subsection I. This subsection limits variances to a business prem-
ise requirements. Physical conditions peculi
i can create problems with these requirements. The variance proc•
ess should not be, used to modify other requirements in the model ,
ordinance, such as limitations on the type afe Lain the street
tivi can display, because they are essential requitern
graphics control system. +
• Subsection 2. This subsection contains variance standards similar
qq ! to those 'nntained in state zoning enabling legislation. The standards
3 authorize a variance only if then are physical conditions unique to
the property and o"iy if the applicant can show substantial finan•
cial hardship. The courts in zoning variance cases have extensively
Interpreted these standards.
I Alferrnafyve Provision for Vsrtances. The Oak Park, Minols, street
t graphics ordinance contains an alternative variance provision, This
• bases the approval of variances on design criteria sla
provision nilar i
jl to those used in the design revieSectio ordinances of the model or 1
I reproduced in the commentary r,
! dlnarrce, which authorizes Areas of Special Control, The following
variant provision
«s from alt of the regulations ce. inathe oridinance,
t It authorizes r • '
Page 2
l~
l !
1
i4
I
I rr {@WR®~t
Street Graphics Model Ordinance 115
SECTION WL
r Variances
L The Board of ZonPng Ad}ustment may pant a variance from the regu-
lations in this ordinance if It finds that:
(a) The street graphic is substandafiy consistent with the design criteria
contained in this section, and
t (b) The proposed exterior design features of the suet graphic are <om•
paoble with the character of adjacent buildings and with the charoc•
t ter of the adjacent neighborhood,
2. The design criteria appUcable to variances for street graphics are as
5 follows:
(The design criteria specify design factors the Board must consider and
also include substantive standards. The following provision is an exam.
r= ple of a substantive standard.)
i`,i' (a) The street graphic shall have good scale and proportion in its de• i
sign and In its visual relatioruhip to buildings and adjacent areas.
(b) The material, size, color, levering, location, and arrangemw of
the street gnph(c shall be an Integral part of site and building
design.
4 (c) The colors, materials, and lighting of the street graphic shall be re-
strain ed and harmonious.
4. (d) righting for the stmt graphic shall be in harmony with the de•
i sign of the street graphic and the building or premises on which
it is to be displayed.'
SECTION! 1,16.
AJ%1OKnZATION OF NONCONFORMING GRAFHICS
A nonconforming graphic must be removed, modified, or altered
to comply with this ordinance no later than three pears (roia the date
on which it becomes nonconforming.
i
I
Coatrnentuy
This section enacts a three-}'ear amortization period for nonconform-
Ing graphics. The courts In some states may require a longer amorti-
' cation period while in other states a shorter period may be approved,
The definition of nonconforming graphic specifies the dates on which
a graphic beCOme9 narnconformingr
The amortization protdslon assuutts that a commualty can require
the removal or modification of nonconforming graphics after a desig•
nated period of time. The amortization provision does not base the
amnrF41;6 fnn nonnrt nn rmnr i7AHnn far•tnra emch as the original cost
Page 3
i
ry
t
I' I OPTION C
too I
401
j
Proposed District
Boundary y
r
,r - Existing DistrictT
INSET _ Boundary
~1.`
Precinct Boundary
I
Precinct Split
i 4!7
i
r
I
,,a
DJ~p{~ Y I
tl
s '
4 1.
J.P3
.1
1 t 419
i
a.
I ~
` r
f J
1
`1
i
F'
erg== - - -
i
_p - R_
i
.
__--`r ~I 7~
_1 j ~a ` 3a.31i 1 IF II _ _ wwoo NMA
lest,
Ism - Iy y^ I i ! r
1 f 31 -Ir'~'~I~ ll. -'i7 I, r 71 YI ua .aufl ,I rL
rr I~~ i fl
~ i~ 1405 4 .4 u~~ ~'ap:4 ~48 I,; I Ili it y r 1'- \ ai II r'
~fry
~ ~.fr rI nr. Y I! Q I! 1 ~ fwnti
ETTI
MMEx
vl
AtAtte
r--~___
~ , DISTRICT 1
~ ;r rr -i' r l T i i 1
~5
r ,P=:
` ~ 1 J 4 L, I`
r'YX M.O. rmi,f__. 416-
1 ~ _ 1 1
~I l` i
I_~.i,
§a ~J _ III rl 7
i"~ ~ \ rJ ~ 4 I
I a
li ihi! .i ' I 1- - hir •t 'V 1
H: / > 7-J L 1 y
a, ~ 4,
r. / ' C
T 1
i , / 1 1 T •a~ _ 11 _ v~.ea _ _~L j > d II
f'- L
i5 41 i..~. /1
n Yal - I \ ~ ~ J
r' i
tI{
I
"YI.'I
! /
414 r
Ir`~ ~i J , T•
a
4`
pSp~F
is
'r
~ r E
t~
~I i3
r
L ~ ~ 3.f
'
_ Yl~~~
f. _ r 1 I, li t:
~ • ~ _t
~A._.~. -
y~"i t
A rw
ti7
w
A
r
ASS
.N Soy
! 401 A OPTION D f
Proposed District
pp
J Boundary tl .
Existing District. MATCH
r Boundary
INSET
Precinct Boundary E---~
`1
i II
Precinct Split
1
417 k
r
I
N/`0
I
X03 4
i
i 419
\
i a
i
i
i
I l.~ Yu I~
104 II` JI Ksv ~ I
- lil 1
I
wr
i
•l~ -
4.n 4
r • ~ Ywa l1 1 T %-A
MI• \ i r yI 1 Y1♦_
, + ~ t 'II I,t•. Iyf ,•~•.\Y •vu ' ~ :,'v ~ w q rr+. _ r.... - ` II
T^
~ ~ I III I " ~ ~ I J, I • - ~ w I ,.a 1 Wi . ~ - .'i
Il I a In',. I s s w• A
I - J WON
5
41
w• IW
i r
$405 V I, s wl4~r
,fit IIIa IJ 5
}~'Irl f ~ .n/ ~ • 1~ { i ~ ~ f rMa i r it
114 M• _ aJLl , 1 M. Y
r=, " 41~
r
P-e • ~ 11' I ~
416 Al,
415
~f 1 I a
I 4
t r 1 ~ o
L
,,oo I
g: 9
5 412 + ~ _ (III _ ~[ll w•. ll~ I
,1 \
i 1 t I ~ 4+I
r v wa ,
1
!l l
'I
I x _
I ! YV. '1
` _ 11r ~"1 ` ~~Alb• I-
414
Ii
.'f
I~. l + 1 ,t
t 1~~
to
-z
is
f: ' 1
}
C
rn, .
t. „
3
r
30 Management Informatlon Service
b. riimg. A variation request shall be filed in writing with the Article XVIh Penalties for Violations
Director of Building and shall include the following information;
(I) The names, addresses, and telephone number of the peal- 26,17-01 Failure to Obtain or Renew Sign Permit. Any person wt
Honer. the owner of the property on which the sign is to be erects, alters, or relocates within the Village any sign without hr
s erected or affixed, the owner of the sign, and the person to obtaining a sign permit or fails to renew such permit for an existu
be erecting or affixing she sign. sign as specified in Article XII of this Ordinance shall be subject to
t2) A description of the requested variation. penalty of fifty dollars ($50.00).
f3) Justification of she requested variation.
14) The location of the building, structure, or zoning lot on 26.17-02 Display of Illegal Non-Conforming Signs, Any person wl-
which the sign is to be erected or affixed. displays a sign in the Village found to be in violation of one (1)
r5) A site plan of the property involved, showing accurate more of the provisions of this Ordinance, except for those legal not
placement thereon of the proposed sign, conforming signs as specified in Article XIV, Section 26.14-01, aft.
(6) A blueprint or ink drawing of the plans and specifications of receipt of written notice of such violation(s) shall be subject to
the sign to be erected or affixed and method of construction penalty of not less than fifty dollars ($50.00) nor more than five hur
and attachment to the building or in the ground. Su.h plans died dollars (5500,001 for each day In which such sign is displayed
and specifications shall include details of dimensions, mate,
rials, color, and weight, 26.17.0,1 Other Remedies In addition to all other remedies, 1F
(71 The written consent of the owner of the building, structuro, Village may Institute any appropriate action or proceeding to Pleven
or property on which the sign is to be erected or affixed. restrain, correct, or abate any violation of this Ordinance.
(8) Such other information as the Director of Building may
require to determine full compliance with this and other Article XVlfh Special District Sign Regulations
applicable ordinances of the Village,
c. Fees. Ea<h variation request to the Sign Variation Committee 26.18-01 Establishment of Regulations, The Village Board may fror
,hall be accompanied by a one hundred dollar (8100,00) fee to time to time establish slgn regulations separate from the provlslons c
he paid at the time of filing of the variation request, ibis Ordinance for a deslgnntod area of the Village. Such districts sha
2. Sign Vnritrriu,t Cornn,itfee Pril0k, Nearing, be contiguous, of substantial size, and possess certain unique charac
a. Tfwijig. The Sign Variation Committee shall hold a public terlstics, as determined by the Village Board, to warrant sign regula
hearing on a variation request within sixty (60) days of Its com• tions which differ from one (1) or more of the provisions of this Ord
pleted written filing, nance. A map deflning the district and special regulations, which ma
b. Alfendance. The petitioner and Director of Building and/or modify certain defined provlslons of this Ordinance, will upo '
their authorized representatives shall attend those meetings of approval by the Village Board be made an attachment to this Ordt
the Sign Variation Committee at which a variation is to be nonce. If, and to the extent that, special district regulations ar
heard, approved by the Village Board, such regulations shall be observed b-
3. Srundurrle for Vuririliorte, The Sign Variation Committee may the persuns affected In lieu of compliance with the affected provision
r(cnnunend to the Village Buard dint a variation be granted when of this Ordinance. Flowever, those provisions of this Ordinance whirl 3
it shall he determined from evidence presented to the Committee are nut affected by the special district sign regulations shall cunllnu i
that the variation will not merely serve as a convenience Io the to apply in thedesignated special district, Nothing in this Article XVII
j petitioner but is necessary to alleviate some demonstrable hardship or elsewhere in this Ordtnance shall prevent the establishment o
or unusual practical difficulty and that thegranting of the variation special district sign regulations which are more stringent than those se i
r will not in any way be Inconsistent with the intent, purpose, and forth in this Ordinance,
s objectives of this Ordinance,
4. Si,Qrt Variation Committee Recouunondation, Within thirty 00) 26,18-02 Conditions for Approval, No special district sign regula
days alter the close of the required public hearing of a requested Aloes shall be approved by the Village Board unless the regulations or.
variation (runt one (I ) tit more of the provisions of this Ordlnanct, binding upon all persons and property located in the designated -are)
the Sign Variation Committee shall prepare and submit written to which the regulalluns are intended to apply,
findings of fact and recommendations to grant, deny, wholly or In
1 part, or modify said variation rtqutst to the Village Board for final Article XIXi tfftctlve Date
determination,
(i S. Village Board Dererminatfon, Within thirty (30) days after the The effective data of this Ordinance Is September 14, 1982.
receipt of the Sl8n Variation Committee written findings of fact
( and recc:.tmendatlons concerning an appeal, the Village Board, Artl<It XXt Oldt Schaumburg Centro Slgn ResuLttlons
I upon the majority vote of Its entire membership, shall grant, deny,
wholly or In part, or modify said variation request as It determines in accordance with Article XVIII, there is hereby established slgr
appropriate and to that end shall have all the powers of the offices rrgulauons fur a special diorlo known as the Oldt Schaumbure
from which the requested variation was taken, Centre, Unloo otherwise iptclflod, the conditions and terms cum
6. 6ifeel of Village 0oard Denial. No requested variation which has tafnod In Chapter 26 shall apply,
been dented wholly or in part by the Village Board in accordance
with the provisions established hereto, may be resubmlued for a Designation of Ode Schaumburg Centre Boundad"t
period of one (1) year from the date of sold dental, except on (Notes A map Is displayed to define the boundarles,)
grounds of new evidence or proof of changed conditions found to
be valid by the Village Board. 26,20.01 Central Provisions,
7, Viflaga ecurd Raroeafiast, in any case where a variation has been
Wanted, and where no work pertinent thereto has been Inlllaled A. fidsls tin Wlslrh Signs Are Regulated. The display of slgno in the
within tint, (1) calendar yvu from the date of Village Bunrd Ofde Schaumburg Centre Is hereby regulated on the basis of tit
,tppruvnl of the requested variation, then without further action by , following f.utursi
editor the Sign Variation Committee or the Village Board, said 1. The type of activity displaying the signt and
variation shall become null and void, 2. The following ten (10) design featuresi
8. ,bla6rrMtance of Records. The Director of Building shall maintain a. The type of sign
complete records of all findings of fact and re<ommend,uitins of die b, Items of inrnnnatfon on sinn Page 4
Sign Variation Committee and all doterminations of the Villoge c. The area of the sign
a
r
CITY OF AUSTIN. TEXAS
(c) institute legal proceedings, including suits for injunctive
relief, when necessary, to insure compliance with thi:
chapters and
(d) investigate complaints of alleged violations of thie
chapter,
section 13-13-420, sign Review Board
F (a) The sign Review Board, referred to in this chapter as the
"board", is created as an advisory board to advise the
Council with respect to the provisions and enforcement of
this chapter.
I (b) The board consists of seven members appointed by the Cit1
Council, Except for those first appointed, a member of the
board is appointed for a term of two years. of those first
appointed, two are appointed for a term of one year, two for
a term of two years and three for a term of three years,
1
j (c) A person is qualified to be appointed to the board if that
person is a resident of Austin. The city Council shall
appoint three persons to the board who have special
knowledge or expertise relevant to outdoor advertising, The
City council shall take a insure
diversity among the board members. A board member oreceives
no compensation or expense reimbursement for his service on
the board.
(d) The board shall have the power to establish rules and
procedures necessary to govern the conduct of its business,
1 + (e) The board shall have the power to hear and act upon
applications for variances from the terms of this chapter,
as provided in section 13-13-450.
Section 13-13-450, variance Procedure
jk (a) Findings, The Hoard may grant a variance from the
application of this chapter after making the following
findingss
(1) that a variance in necessary because of
unique features of a site, such as its
dimensions or landscaping and terrain
features;
(2) that granting a variance will not have a
substantially adverse impact upon neighboring
properties; and
(3) that granting a variance will not
substantially conflict with the stated
purposes of this chapter.
24
V. rl ~n.ij
nza rsor~
svcn sign is attached or upon which it is enacted.
SecTSON ll. Removal or Rnpair of Unsafe Signs.
if the building official ahalI determine that any sign is
1 unsafe or insecure, or is a menace to the public, he shall give
written notice to the parson or persons rosponoLble for such
sign. If the permittee, owner, agent or person having the
boneficial use of the premises fails to remove or repair the sign
within ten 110) days after such notice, such sign may be removed
by the building official at the expense of the permittee or owner
of the property upon which it Is located. The building official
may cause any sign which is an immediate peril to persons or
property to be removed summarily and without notice,
SECTION 14, Sign Board of Appeals,
There Ls hereby created a Sign Board of Appeals consisting
of seven (7) members who shall have the power to grant variances
from the provisions of this Ordinance if it appears that the
provisions would work a manifset injustice, end in making such
determination the board shall consider such factors to the type
of sign, the location, existence of signs in the general area,
and such other factors as they doom pertinent, No variance shall
be granted by the board if the same conflicts with the spirit of
this Ordinance, which is one of providing public eatety, adequate
lighting provisions, open space and air, conservation of land,
pratectiof the operty values, and encouraging the highest and
be use Members of the Sign Board of Appeals shall b• appointed by
the City council and shall be removable by the appointing
E authority, A member so appointed shall hold his or her office
for a term of two (2) years except in case of appointments to
fill vacancies for unexpired terms, In the event of a vacancy,
I the city council shall appoint a member to serve the unexpired
term, Members shall serve until May 31st, of the year of their i
• term's expiration, and their successors eorve until May 31st, two
years thereafter,
The city council shall appoint the chairman of this board.
The board shall elect a vice-chairman„ who shall preside in the
chairman's absence, The Code Enforcement Department shall
provide statf.support to the board,, The minutes of the meetings
shall be recorded, showing the vote of each member upon each
question, and shall be made a matter of public rocard,
rive (3) members of the Sign Board of Appeals shall
constitute a quorum, in the event of the absence of the chairman
and vice-chairman, the five (S) members Constituting the quorum
shall elect for that meeting a member to proside As Acting
t chairman And to assume All duties of the Chairman. The
tt concurring vat• of four members of the board shall be
I necessary to render a decision In favor of the • pellant on any
matter upon which it is requirxd to pass under this ordinance, or
( to effect any variance to this Ordinance, or to overrule any
interpretation of this Ordinance by the building official, The
sign Board of Appeals shall meet on the eeeond Tuesday of each
month, provided there has been an appeal filed with the building
OU Leia seven (1) days prior to the meeting data,
En considering the request tot variation to requirements of
this Ordinance, the sign board shall consider, but not be limited
to, the do toe of variance, the reason for variance requested,.
the location of the variance request, the duration of the
fuquosted variance, the offset on public safety, protection of
holghborhood property, the degree of hardship or injustice
involved, and the effect of the variance on the general plan of
raqulatl.ng signs within the city, The decision of the Sign Board of Appeals shall be final.
3. Decreasing Existing Si na e
ere the existing amount of total effective sign area
would be decreased and/or the height of one or more
signs would be decreased on a premise, the Board may
grant an exception to only the height, effective area,
number of signs per premise, number of signs per
street Frontage, perimeter property line setbacks, or
illuminated sign setback provisions.
(a) In making such a determination to grant this
i special exception, the Board shall consider:
(1) the degree to which sign non-conformities are
being decreased,
' (2) the type of
provisions being excepted compared
to the type of sign non-conformity being
eliminated or decreased,
(3) the location of the proposed exception in
relation to its surroundings and adjacent
property,
(4) other existing signage in the area.
E r ,
(b) In granting this special exception, the Board may
impose reasonable conditions which would be in
accordance with the spirit of this article, its
intent to abate ineffective, unsafe, or unsightly
signage, and to protect adjacent property,
i
1 (c) In granting this special exception, the Board s'
shall not allow deviation from the provisions of
this article beyond which is minimally necessary
to remedy the situation.
(d) Before granting this special exception, the Board
shall make the following specific findings:
(1) that the exception is in harmony
E intent to abate ineffective, unsafe,horhe
unsightly signage,
(2) that the exception does not substantially
injure neighboring property.
(3) the exception will not weaken the general
E purposes of the regulations.
F
I959x
k
i
M
i
t If
N
)r.. .r a
24IaiH{+.\q
F
ia"f3Y1~{{~
a
ATTACHlf MT 3
~ sr~x oRn~xaxca Hrs~
October 15, 1985 New sign ordinance adopted.
t October 1987 Beautification Task Force proposes new sign
ordinance.
February 71 1989 New sign ordinance adopted.
i October 31 19e9 Council requests review of setback standards,
comprehensive review of 1989 ordinance begins.
November 7, 1989 Sign setback standards amended.
November 22, 1989 Planning and zoning discusses sign ordinance
amendment process.
November 27, 1989 Beautification Task Force discusses sign
ordinance amendment.
November 280 1989 Invitations to P&Z public hearing made to all
F sign owners.
i
December 13, 1989 Planning and Zoning holds public hearing.
January 10, 1990 Planning and Zoning holds sign ordinance
workshop and discusses major issues.
February 6, 1990 Council discusses process and major issues in
work session.
February 28, 1990 Planning and Zoning adopts work program.
March 17, 1990 Planning and Zoning recommends amendments to
enable SDNPT certification.
April 1990 Sign Task Force with representatives from sign
owners and dovernmental Affairs begin to most.
s
April 3, 1990 Council amends for sDNPT certification.
Nay, 1990 Staff discussions with Beautification Task Force
and Oovernmental Affairs Committee "City Views"
article published.
May-September, 1990 staff works individually and collectively with
Sign Task Force and Beautification Task Force.
August 2, 1990 Sign Task Force and Beautification Task Force
meet.
August 70 1990 Off-premise sign fee ordinance adopted.
October 11, 1990 Amendments board formation briefed to Affairs.
October 24, 1990 Planning and Zoning recommends height measure
and appeals board amendments.
a
f
Sign ordinance History
Page 2
November 20, 1990 Council passes height measurement and board sign
amendments.
November 3990- Subcommittee of Beautification Task force and
February 1991 Sign Task Force meet eight times for up to five
hours per meeting.
February 13, 1991 Planning and Zoning public hearing on concepts.
ti
March 50 1991 Work Session with city council on concepts.
March 61 1991 Public hearing/work session with P&Z. P&Z
directs staff to prepare an ordinance for their
consideration.
March 20, 1991 POZ holds public hearing and recommends
urdinance.
April 2, 1991 Public hearing. Council adopts comprehensive
i changes to Sign Ordinance.
June 27, 1991 first Sign Board of Appeals meeting. Three
variances considered.
i
August 6, 1991 Bill Dennison of Carpets Plus makes citizen
report about changing face of Abby Floors sign.
council asks P&Z to look into "face changing"
rules and variance criteria.
August 14, 1991 P&Z discusses sign ordlnNnoe amendment process.
August 28, 1991 P&Z holds public hearing on signs and discusses
amendments.
September 110 1991 P&Z directa staff to prepare 4 year temporary
! use permit.
October 9, 1991 P&Z directs staff to prepare amendments
ooncerning temporary use and the variance
criteria.
October 22, 1991 Council work asesion.
! AXX00048
n
C
~.••~~,J.f11~'1,d1.t111I71JJ7T1"IIIII7 ,r
Main Street News
ATTAC[iMENT 4
r
- Number 70
" •
August 1001
mainstpeel
and eronomic vitality typically 3 qr :r
have an effective sign control ''"e ace is t
process. The elements of ellec•
Live sign control are the subject :ramie, aeo
of this article. dm,t/
a E ' N In a continuing ellort to pres.
W ent a variety of opinions on the
Mrs.. full spectrum of downtown re.
L vitalization issues, the NMSC
~G~E' is pie asedto offer this anicleby
PIJ
.riw1T~. r L Edward T. McMahon, a notion.
P t ally recognized loaderM the field
of aesthetio andsign regulation,
- Ana Aberadby, program
aswcfete, NMSCN MP,
` When was the last time you
really looked it the streets of
your communltyI Drive out to
the edge oftown. Stop at the city
limits. Now look at what you
sea L the scene pleasingt Does
it snake a good first impression
on viaitors, or is the scene ugly
+ and cluttered?
Now, head downtown, Look
At the strestsespe along the way,
Does ym community appear
Attractive, Interesting, uniquel
or, does your town look like
"Anyplace, USAt" Whatever
ROB" youraaswa of your
an tmmediate, visible change physical appearance of your
in its physical appearance. Prop community Is important. You
oily draped and enforced sign should also secognls;e that one
roattlationcanreinforce thedis. of the snot important impacts
Edward T. McMahon dncth'e design quality of a down, on a community's sppeuance is
Enacting awthstlo controls, town and, in fact, the ontirs sip control, or the lack of it.
especially sign regulation, v one com n t nity, non communities We need signs. We can't get
of the malt powetM actions a that have achieved the elusive along without them. They give
community can take to make combination of visual appeal w direction and necessary in.
v .
National Trust for Historic Preservation
JJ
f.,
I,
G~udrC N~w~.yi~-Y ..1 J. 6n W Ili tiucts
tectural feature, a business sign to scan aconfusingsmorgasbord design and placement, This ar_
can delight the eye, it can be of clutter to find what they are ucle will concentrate on the legal,
colorful, decorative, even dis• looking for. Other, more suc• political and practical aspectsof
tinguished. So why talk about a cessful towns control the size, sign regulation,
sign problem I Because too often number and even construction
signs are misused, poorly planned materials of signs, The resulr a
or designed, oversized, badly pleasing, inviting appearance that TYWj of I
located and altogether too gently beckons consumers In. Most localordlr=cesdis
numerous, steadofassaulting them, Agood tinguish between on.
In many cities, sign clutter sign code Is probusiness, since premise and off-premise
dominates the streetscipe, over, an attractive business district signs, On-premise signs
shadowing buildings and trees, will attract more consumers than are integral to the business and
eroding cultural and mchitec, an ugly one. Moreover, when the buflding, They are not a
tural diversity, ruining scenic signs are controlled, merchants separate anddistinct landuse of
Aatswe ou~0oaros .
taraacwmann
siraeL -
DOUBLE
COUPONS I
ii .
.
views and historic emblem and do a better lob of sailing st lest busineat, 00.1111 mite signs, du
bUghting whole neighborhoods. cost. Indeed, several studies on known as bWboards, us a sepa
in in effort to attract bud. visual perception have shown rate and distinct business sincc
ness, merchants oh an engsp in that when the size and number abillboatdisnotaa $""$cry tc
a destructive competition to see of signs are reduced, the viewer a building or butlnest.
who can build the biggest, most actually sees more. The dletitnction between on.
ittention-grabbing sign.lironl• Sign control is even more premise andoff•premisesigns 0
tally, in such competition both Important to historic areas that important beausa It allow,
the merclants and the town losa depend on tourism. Why l Be. communities to morn heavll-
A lick of sign control creates cause the more one town comes restrict off-premise signs. On
chaos and clutter, When there is to look Uka every other, the teat premise signs ire necessary t
an oversbundana of competing reason there is to visit. Ort the Identify a business. Thus, a to
signs, the message of each is other hand, the more a commu• tal prohibition would violate
lost. Ono city planner expressed pity does to enhance its unique business person's Pint Amenc
it this way, "When everyone assets, the more tourists it will meat right to free speech Or
shouts, no one can be hwdo Ukely attract, promise eikos are also in sixes
when iltspeaksoftly, each voles The National Toast's Main sory to a permitted use, I.e., th
is distinct." Street Center has a technical store or busiaas, Billboards, o
Some towns allow signs in bulletin and slidt show on the the other hand, are a distinc
I
2 NmooAl Niain Street Cornet, Natmnsl Trait for Histotu Preservation
E
tnor., business that can be regulated towns and neighborhood com• ton, Tex„ St. Louis, Mo., San
s u• or even totally prohibited by a metcial districts.
egal, sign ordinance, Many communities have de. Diego, Calif,, fackson are e Fla„
and Little Rock, Ark, j ust a
tsof main Street managers typi• tided that the best ordinance is few of the many titles that pro.
tally devote a great deal of time one that bans All new billboards hibit the construction of new
and attention to improving the and requires the removal of any billboards,
design and placement of store. Already in existence, Today, more The Houston ordinance,
front signs. Commercial design, than 2,000 U.S. cities ban bill. passed May 9, 1980, is typlcal;
dLo however, requires looking at the boards. Such communities as "Prohibition o/ NowOJJ•Prerm
on. streetscape as a whole, not lust As
rise at the facadesofindividualbusi• pen Colo, Cooperstown, N,Y,, ist Signs. From and After the
ins nesses, Sign control affects the
ind overall image of the commu• a:aretoiti aarat6
r a nlry,Withoutproperregulation, nanaromanceh{n
)wnmt ie e
or gas stations, fast-food resttAurants, an In 01 3i
a u urr ire
portable signs, billboards and oats imngs
other problem signs can defeat a
community's efforts to foster a
distinctive Image and sense of
place. The following section lop
focuses on those signs that de•
tract from a community's ap-
pearance orpresent speclalregu. '
'b latory problems, t
i
WON*
One type of sign that is
goner Lily out of place In
a historic district, neigh-
i bcrhood shopping dL e
t • trict, or downtown commercial i
core is the bWboard. Also known
ss An off•premise sign, a bW
s .r w~e,w
bond advertfses products or
services that ate not sold or dls.
tributed at the site where the
I sign is located,
The billboard Is advertising's
slam dunk. Will Intrusivei Out
of place] You can't turn thepagq to
you can't change the station.
And, because bWboards look
Pretty munch the some from coat
to coast, they can quickly turn a
t. town into "Anyplace, USA."
`s BWboards ue espo"y do- Aaaaptl Md, Alexandria, Va., effective date, no new eonatruo.
structive of older and drolliaing Concord, Mass,, and Santa Bu• tion permits shall be issued tot
y towns beattu their presence bun, C&W,, all ban bWboardar ad-ptentisesigns within the city,
t• inhibits the kind of improve. so do fire swool Vermont, Main
mentsandlnvestmeau•. both Rhode Island, Make nd Hit. alThe l classifications of si apply e$
(o publfo and private - that are wail Not s Asia ' lips
t ur7 sty, commu• of slgsu, epeoid function slpstt
needed to upgrade such commu• nines and states that ban or and aU other signs used as off.
nitles, Thus, bWboarde ate both strictly regulate bWboatds two premise signs, Including port-
a c4use and a symptom of urban almost LU known ere premier able signs,"
deny, and their elimination or touln datlnations. Removing exlacing bWboardn
e reduction In numbs an be a in recent years, the trend has to not
t first step in stimulating the to. been for cities to ben the tong but it is possible,
t vitaUutlon of depressed down. struwan of new bilbool FVou removing billboards: atithtrition,
s`
amortisation, exchange, sego, fied. This techni
I "Ation and purchase. 9ue has been new, co
Attrition. For many commu• approved by the overwhelming another localtotn,g aillboard in
pities, attrition Is the elm lest malority of courts that have
easiest and most politically ac. considered the problem. This approach is pantcululy boards from
ceptabtewaytoremove existing merhodfo tionivingneforrei dottabiefortheremovafofbin.
districts,
bePtIbl ls. ayt or results from formingsigns, but as a practkal scenic roads and Oter historic Areas 0'
banning new signs. 4Vh1ie rhis matter wnr°wrt COmmercia! tLstricrs won'
ecia ! ban will not improve a city's ap. work. Oneoofu ti pr 61e ms Is p is: A his: A l citern. I k eltotwor! k s lik e
penance overnight, it will pre. that the Federal he Highway Concern.
aps num f
vent the problem from worsen. tification Act prohibits bheeuse community and Prohi her of off-premise signs in the
ing. That can be particularlyim• of amortization to ramove non. construction of new billbo the
portanrtorapidly growing com. conforming kilboudsalong led. except to th that such
munirlesbecause itensure$that Oral lnterstateAndPrimary h! lu
gh• signs replace e existing extent billbouds.
new roads will not become as ways. In addition, many states For example, suppose
'.r;dDle>prs
`:'.a a Und :tit you have
:dsCr? $ w1y
1"d "2f ms In Tiny
ti:rrmdrGdl Jfdd S. _ ' ~ T
t
CKMOpEW
APPARIEL
~~Rf,: BCYS
w
Cluttered as exfating road, A have legislation that
ban on new billboards w11! alto ho weofamortisatfonoaothl five bWbodrds In a slowly reduce thenumbet0fex• roatujej0 • Note: 7'heaefawsa historic district.
You eculd re
'sting off•premlu signs About generally 4pP1y to billboarrft quite that one or more (even All cen
t of
prerrilse ueeto t each ear due to ate 0111Y. Amortization is sttlf an five( of these billboards, be wins
don (redevelopment , canceled cono vetoolfatremo movedlnexchaniPforallo/ rrniri on• a $'ingnon• the bWboardeomptnytoerects
lass eta( In Houston, for You should checkyo~tate)& sw new conforming tign on the in,
example, attrition has produced to determine whether it allows testate or
a stgrlfteantdeolinein the num. side of town, The 1 81 Mobas,
her of billboards: from Y 084 In on the amortization of billboards ALL,
ordinance u re
1980 to about 4 t nonfederal roads, outdo od.
today' Bxclsaagt, Clven the practl• Moratorium, No outdoor ofE
Amettistiom This method c4 Problems with amortlratio premise advertising Shall be con
provides A designated time due, 4 anscructedOrerectedaharthedate
Ingwhichanoncnnformingsiy communities are enact. of the enactment of this ordi•
must beremovedormo"ed to Provisions ~ g exchange pre Istont, Then! mace except to the extent that
comply with the o:dlrtance. At onies remove one require blllboandcom, such sign replaces an existing
the end of the time period, the existingononconforminr b!!! off meat pre n sign Any repo A.U
4 sign must be removed or moth. boards before they can erect a sons shalt conform t, all
Provisions of the ardlrtanca
almn~l Slim $veet C.nuc N~ttanaf rhst tot Hlftot0e Plrscnjuon
,
j
1
I/
An exchange provision can billboards are subject to local low portable signs for tempo
requuethat any number of non. property taxes. However, unlike rary display only•-e,g.,dodays
conforming signs be removed. the land on which the billboard a yearforsales, grand openings,
Orlando, Fla., has a law that re. Is located, the sign Itselfisoften etc. This approach has twoprob.
quires the removal of three non. inadvenently left off the tax rolls. ferns, however. First, it is al.
conforming billboards In ex. The community should make Most Impossible to enforce, The
hange for every new one. A sure that every billboard is listed high mobility of portable signs
communitythatallows thecom on the local personal property fosters fast, illegal replacement,
struction of new billboards - tax roll. It should make sure moreover, sign owners seldom
under any circumstances - that billboards are assessed At remove these signs at the end of
should always insist on an ex. "fair market value" and that the their legal time period. A sec.
change provision, If you don't, tax revenue is put into the sign and reason to put a total ban on
billboard companies will con. abatement fund. The city can portable signs is that courts are
tinue to put up new signs in per. then use these funds to remove more likely to strike down par.
mitred locations while refusing nonconforming billbouds. Be. tial bans, they question how a
to remove existing billboards la sides property taxes, communi. portable sign can be a safety
nonconforming locations, ties often use business license hazed and aesthetic harm at
Negotiation. Billboard com. and gross receipts taxes to gen, certain times, but not at others.
pantes are sometimes willingto erate funds for billboard removal
negotiate the removal of bill.
boards from Inappropriateloca•
tions such as historic districts PQ .,'''Not..
or downtown areas. Before nags. 81ftd ik atiating with a billboard com. Portable signs are the
piny, you should know that junk mall of the street.
curtain billboard locations are scspe,Theymovearound,got
in
more valuable than others This people's way and clutter up the $ 3
fact combinedwith &strictordi. sidewalks in many revitalized D ~
nance can lead to the negotiated commercial areas. Portable Spa
~J
removal of problem billboards, axis almost never allowed in L/
1]L~!s~" "
For example, one Callfornfa con shopping mall or other con. N
j -unity negotiated the removal trolled envirorrmente. They its CIO
eight billboards in a down, likewise out of place on Main
'(r
kown historic district by allow. Street. Not only are they ugly J. x
Ing the billboard UP
company to and tout ~v'
handicapped are also a ~
s put up one new sign on a flea hazard to o the the handicapped and ~
way where they were otherwise visually Impaired and danger,
prohibited The billboard com. ous in high winds or Stormy
piny agreed to this eight-for. weather. Sign ordinances typi•
one exchange because the free. ally define a portable sign as W d MU Onto
way biliboud could generate "any sign which Is movable and Wall should be Hmi
n.
more income than the eight which to riot ~ are at. In sir. and madi
downtown si permanently as uehedtoehebuild. armanruM
guts combined. cached to a building, structure ig, The design of a blp olmg ata to 1M
Sip abatemwt fund. A city or the pound
can always remove billboards Thesimpleetsolution toregu. dictate the best location k~
by eminent domain in which lating portable signs is to pro. Will sips, Such Signs should be
case it will have to pay for theam hibft thorn ourrlght. Many com, limited In proportion to the size
Many communities have paid munittes include portable Signs of the building, not to exceed a
to remove bWboards, and the in the llstof siptsprohibited by certain maximum, for example,
federal government has spent the ordinance. Otthars are lace 200 square feet of 20 percent of
more than $200 million to re. direct. Clearwater, Fla., for ex. the frontal area, whichever is
move billboards along federal ample, Wines Portable Signs but smaller, Will signs should not
highways, then fail to include them among obscure windows or other key
One technique used to genes. the list of permitted Signs - archltectuntl details. In addltion
ate funds lot billboard removal which thus amotinta to a total to Will Signs, some cities Par-
is to eatsbUsh a sip abatement ban. The preferred approach Ii mit one hag" or projecting
fund. Cities often use the m o., to define portable signs and than sips mounted at a right angle to
generated from taxes on ban themsxpllcitiy. thebuliding.Insoneral,project.
)oardstosetupthefund. All The other approach Is to el. Ing signs should be limited in
5
c;~cS
size, and the mattt.al should be much taller than 12 to 15 feet pp.~,,~~,,..,~,..
appropriate to the building, are difficult to see through an 1owr h>il~`i am
automobile windshield. Reduc•
FMUNift NF4 ing sign height will save mer. MPffdo
any cities have ordi•
Freestanding signs are chants money and make it eas• Fruinces that prohibit flap.
held above the ground by ier for signs to do the Job they pig pe:utanta because of thou
a structure and are not are meant to do. Many cities are distruting nature and oh on tacky
attached to a building. replacing pole signs with ground, appearance Regulattngflags and
'there are two types; pole signs or monument, signs, banners, however, presents prob.
and ground signs, Their princi• Ground sips, as their name les that require special at•
aaresgnsIre tentlson. It is almost certainly
0renItofail To unconstitutional to prohibitthe
maximum ne,pnl
tar mere lions display of the U.S. or otheroffi.
12 to
snowG to 5 clal flags. Yet everyone is famd.
'set.
lar with the car dealers and other
merchants who display ottor.
moos American flags, far larger
than any permittedsign, to grab
attention. To address this prob.
lem, some communities limit
tr
-pre e e
y~.y nald the height of flagpoles said the
size of flap and treat all nonof,
fle.lal flap the McDonald'a
111111611 riotous, r 4, ,
i x flag,forexample -assignssub.
t I ff fect to normal siu limitations.
Illli Official barman in a down.
t town can add color and interest
to thestreetscape. So howean a
r~: t ON It#fII commustity ban unsightly com.
• , r N' . 1A tt menial banners that nay "sale
r Y .a r Here" or "Open Today"and stW
allow decorative banners for spa
oW events or seasonal decors.
do ss, The answer Is simple: Pro.
hibit bawers except as "tempo.
rary st" as pnbllc property (a.g,
street clots) to promote events
to of general civic Interest, subf act
LI/ toaapeciilpermittLragprocess,'
Idk op
+ In their efforts to clean
r t , up aasightly commercial
charts, cities sometime
pal use is for business identifi. Implies, are low to the SouatL throw out the good with
cation outside the downtown They an typically used byvaca• the bed, Old pointed wall signs,
commercial core, tion resorts, planned communl• barber polo, Cavite glass, neta9t,
Pole sips are elevated above ties and other clues attempting poruWa and other sign of out.
the ground by it pole or other to develop • distinctive Images standing crihsmanshlp or de.
structure. Pole signs are often A few examples of commut i. 91St hequse tly run afoul of la
too tall and too numerous. Buss. ties that parnit only mound sim cal ordlnan';es drshed to clean
rases shot+ld be limited to one are Columbia, Md., Hilton Head, up alga ciutter or foster a dis•
heatanding sign with a maxi. S.C., Irvine, Calif,, Chapel HA tlactJve design image,
mum height of 12 to IS feet, An N.C., and Scottsdale, Asia: Unllhethehonsoperil* pls
!deal sign height for visibility tic backlit signs so prevalent
on a city street is a height which today, unique, labor-intensive
puts the sign at eye level for sign from the past are often
those spproachlttg It by cu. Sips, worth sving. peter Phillips of
6 Notional Main Street Ceotet Nauonil Trust tot Historic Preserwitor.
Slanumem ;.qns
keINS one a
Stowe, vt., are
often round ;n
1 vauilon tesmfs,
Planned
commumtes and
171" towns that
wanl 10 tosler a
J'SurMe LmaQe.
-ww
r
"gV % SOW
the Society for Commercial Ar• or aesthetic quality of the city. The most common method
cheology describes old historic rt The sign is structurally safe, for removing signs that don't
signs as "examples of a dying Once designated, a historic conform to the sign code is to
an. They provide Local color, sign would be deemed In com• seta speciflcdatebywhichthey
historic character, individuallry, pliance with the current ordi• must be replaced. M discussed
a sense of place and clues to a nance regardless of Its size, in the section on billboards, this
bulldir4s history," materials, colors or location. process is known as amortize. communities can
But how do you drab a sign unit lne height of
N ~e~,,~,,,,.,, Hon. Businesses aregiven a des, flagp014S and Ine
irdinance that cleans up the YFSSes11111r4 09. ignated period of time during $tye of aft w Vogl
3tter and, at the same time, which the nonconforming si to keep them from
recognizes the value of historic ftma SIBn ovetwnelmi p me
signsl First, conduct a survey of may remain. When the time pe• saeofscapo•
Sign regulation ralse+ ti
historic signs. Develop an in. a number of legal is•
ventory of any signs that may be sues, inclue
Y ding First Amendment
worth saving because of age, freedom of speech hmltatioru•
historcal association, exemplary These issues do not prevent ef•
design or aesthetic quallty,Thls feWve regulation of outdoor signs
list can then be used as the basis and billboards. However, sign
for individual designation and codes must be carefully drafted
protection. to avoid legal challenges, {For
Some cities,permit signs to more information on the legal
be "designated" as hLfitoric by issues of sign regulation, con,
the city council or planning sult the resources listed at the ?
commission if the signs meet conclusion of this article,)
certain criteria, in Culver City, One key legal issue is the
Calif., for examples, a sign can removal of nonconforming signs, ~
be designated if, When you pass a new sign code,
e The sign is at least 50 years many old signs that don't con,
old (other commwaties have a form to the new lase will re• t
more liberal age criteria, ;cmchas main, How do you get rid of
15 or 20 yearn, rherrit There are several tech.
r The sign is an appurtenant niquesEnvremwing noncorsform.
graphic 11-e,, it is an on-premise ing on. Premise signs, Several ate
sign, not a billboard). similar to the methods used to k+
:'he sign is unique and en• remove billboards) others are - -
aces the cultural, historical unique to on•premisa signs.
7 ~
0
7 ^ainiea Nail
.gns .r grill, 4 '.afraaa
te'oNt neon,
V':OJlr Ira
;:n?r S gns of
. .151 ana+ng i
!'I` S.7 ans nia
:..a ce
i: ;n
I
r
i
occupancy or business license
for the premise.
KAP L4_N'x 0"M
younq mEn s shop While there is no legal
lmpedimonttoeffective
alga regulation, there is
Soften a political one. Sign
manufacturers frequently try to
convince local buaings people
that sign control will hurt busi•
ness. To combat this tactic,
counter-persuasion needs to
T begin early. U a business group
comes to a public homing al•
afar.. ready opposed to sign to".
riod is up, the sign must be re- tenance of nonconforrnia>Y signs, tion, Its Advent Influence will
moved or modified to comply ■ prohibit Issuance of building be hardto counteract. However,
with the code. Another method permits for the zone lot while if soldearlyon the advantages of
Is to include a provision requir• nonconforming uses remain. sign control, the business group
Ing that whenever an old sign is The city could also: may become its chief and most
remove, it must be replaced a Offtr to remove the noncon• effective advocate,
with a new one. forming sign without chuge to As a practical matter, of
Additional techniques sug• the owner. wurse,nothing works aswall is
gated by sign control expert Eric n Offer a cash incentive or a tau public education, In Lubbock,
Damien Kelly include the fol. credit for removal of noncon• Tex., tar example, the local zoning
lowing: forming signs, office was able to convince busl•
r Provide a size bonus for a a Condition any rezonings, nessa that compliance was in
new sign if the old sign is to. variances or conditional use their benefit, that small signs
moved by a certain date. permits on the removal of non• could be more attraatlve and
a Prohibit installation of any conforming sign% competitive and could cost less
new signs on the property while a Requirenonconfomtingslgns than large signs, As a result,
a nonconforming sign remains. • to be removed any time these is morethan60 percent of the local
so Prohibit modification ormatn• a change In the certificate of businesses were in compliance
S NAtIOnal .Nun Street Center, NationAl~l Tmit for Historic Preservation
Gl l/ '
i
1 ,4 rTN~~
i i
f
i~
with the law before the amorrl• The signs along city streets longer, invariably choosing it. to
ration period ended. influence the publle's percep• tractivedistrictsoveruglyend,
In Baldwin, Ala,, a localqual. tiJn of individual businasa, Edward T. ,1Scvlahon La comedy
ity of life group commissioned a commercial districts and the a Visiting Scholar at the Envi•
survey of residents' views on community as a whole. Weil. roamental Law Institute, 1616
sign control, tree preservation designed, appropriately scaled P Street, N.W., Washlaton, D.C
and other community appear- signs can enhance a commu• 20036,(2021329-5150, He Is the
ance issues. The results: Rest. nity's unique image, while an cofounder and former president
dents preferred fewer signs and overabundance of haphazardly of Scenic . medca, A preserva.
more trees and landscaping, The placed, oversized, look•alika slots tfonist o id an attorney, ,1St,
survey helped convince local detracts from the community's McMahon has dtalted numer•
businesses that sign controlwas appearance and ultimately hurts ous sign ordlnances, tree preset.
an essential ingredient In en• business. vation laws and other ordinances
hancing both quality of life and Today, once skeptical bust- designed to protect community
economic vitality, nessa acre flourishing in Fairhope, character and Identity.
Communities with strict sign Ala., Stowe, Vt., Raleigh, N.C.,
controls invariably benefit. For Tempe, Ariz., and hundreds of
example, when asked about the other communities with strong
state's experience with sign sign controls, Without excep-
control, the Vermont Travel Di- tion, cities that strictly control
vision said, "Although there was outdoor signs an considered good
some initial sensitivity that re- places to live, work and vaca-
moving billboards and big signs tion, people come back and stay
I might hum tourism, it has had
6 the opposite effect. Tourism is
up for all businesses, both large
and small."
Additional benefits of sign Orgatsits doaai A"oaress
regulation include: ScealoAnsaica
a Individual businesau reoelve 216 7th Street, S,E.
a "level playing field" In other Wuhington, D.C. =M
words, they get a fairer usur" (2021546.1 1W
ance that their signs will not be This orgenlzadoml Sets a a clearb0titue fee iaformatiaa oa
obscured by those of neighbor, $IV control, ecealo made and other foams Of asthetid t ggt-
Ingbusinesses, latitm &pubWhaanttwttletterandprovttlestethnkalusfr
a Because small Signs cost less taros and materials to cammumitlet upon ngwa Mat d
l
than big ones, the total cost of the boob Sad Srtiola lifted below en "Stl" Rota U011111
{ each buslnesa's signs will be less Ametioa
in the long run, /oeks~ A "W" and mansop ow
t` a As clutter is reduced, Mtla
Street and neighborhood cont. Cabh, Aotfyay. "Fottabls Sigpse Los and Raptlatfontt" PAS
merclal areas will become more Mena Amaricea anr%Wi ASwciatian (APA~ iFsb.19if1►
H"imovick 1aa44 "A Tmdng Propoaid" IN Efllboerde."
attractive to Customers.
• The comaaunlty u a whole Pubbe /nnrtmaat. APA, Dee 1989-
will attain a distinctive sense of 11, Ido OWGary • sip Ragutrrdon fart Sma1! and
place, becoming a more StttSC Mf3sfu COmmrmfttlat, APA, 19tH
rive place relive, workaadWalt. hua~i>rar, Daoid Sad WWlam Ewaia Street Craphla ad
the Laws APA Preen, I"*
r McMahw Mwed T. WCUMOLUns Blllb*"* Zeada3 Nlrstc
APA. brae 19tR
' C Almost nothing will d► Mlon Namaa. s$asAr M&* sues. Notmel Mafia Sent!
Cwmz Waahi V400 D.C- Natland'&M fee Nlrea tea
' stxoy the distinctive
chanoter of a comtau• Rrestredatts 19K.
nity fuetr thin uneon• PhIlIl" teat."3lgpCaaaolforFilseasdoSlp~'!PAdlflhr► ~
trolled lips andbillboarda,SIP APA,No%19tfg,
control plays a particularly im• SLSttgheur, Ltbeelse MoNeet. Yluuf PORE den sled Jbisillitli"a
portent role in improving the CaeswL•ALgafltdadbook SmheraEat4~auwe,fbb~~'
appearance of small towns and L &W Csttesw 19fq,
traditional commercial are".
y
h
t i6p, rr~ ,
I CITY O/ DBNTON, rEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 115 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201
MEMORANDUM
5 S
DATE: October 17, 1991
s TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
FROM: John F. McGr.ane, Executive Director of Finance
SUBJECT: COUNCIL REVIEW OF TRAVEL POLICY
During the 1991-92 budget discussion sessions, Mayor Castlebrry r;
asked that the travel policy be brought back to Council' for
review. Attached herewith is a copy of the City's current travel
policy.
If you need any additional information, please advise.
i
JFMcG:af
Attachment
J 0006B
s
I
1
1
8171566,8200 D/FWMEI.:C 434.2529
u
CITY OF DENTON PAGE-1-OF 5
POLICY/ ADIIINISTRATIV3 PRO0NDVBE/ADMINISTRATM DIRICTIVI
AEFERENCE
SECTION: NUMBER:
FINANCE POLICIES 408.0E
EFFECTIVE OATS
SUeACT:
REIMBURSIMINT OF TRAVEL EXPENSES 7/25/84
REPLACES:
I TITLE:
TRAVEL EXPENSES
Previous 408,01
1. Aovroyel Recuired for Travel on city Business The City will pay
expenses for travel required to take care of City business, city
Ii employees must be traveling at the direction or with the approval
i~ of their department directors, The City will not be liable for
any employee travel expenses unless the employee has the prior
f
approval of his or her department director.
i
2. Reimbursement for Actual Ixeensss The City will not pay per diem
expenses. 'The city will pay employseNa actual costs as
authorized within these policies.
t
I
S
First-Class Accommodations Prohibited Employees may choose to
} travel first-class, but the City will pay only for coach or
{ tourist class, if coach is not available, the City will pay for
first-clan, but will not reimburse first-class airfare or travel
accommodations which exceed reasonable rates.
4. 6ntertsinment The City of Denton will not reimburse
employees ,
for entertainment unlrss it is specifically related to the
purpose of the trip.
5. Liabilitv Coysraae City employees traveling on City business
will be covered by insurance to the same extent they sr~ covered
during their regular work hours.
J
s
Y..i4ArY.
7
4,1?Si51[H
PAGEL~OFr 5
_
POLIOVADHINTSTRATIVE PROCEDURVADMINTSTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (C*allaued)
REPERENCB
TITLE TRAVEL B1a'EDSES NUMBER:
408.01
j
f
6. Receipts Required for Reimbursement Receipts for hotels and
airfare must always be provided. Employees must also provide
I receipts for registration or any other expenses over $25.00.
Receipts for meals costing less than $25,00 are not required,
1.
Trananorta ion
i•
a, Commercial Airliner The City of Denton will pay employees
for round trip air coach.
Employees are encouraged to take
advantage of discounts whenever possible. However, employees ~
are not required to fly at unusual times ju.;t to qualify for i
discounts. - i
F
b. Private Air Carrierr and Charterr '
Employees may not use
private airplanes or charters without the expvsse approval of
the city Manager, Cost savings or schedule requirements must
be shown.
E c. Vehiciq Rental The City will not pay for rented cars without
the approval of the employee's department director. Cost
savings or schedule requirements must be shown,
d. Taxi and Li=sings The City will reimburse employees' taxi
and limoains fares for required transportation.
S
7
trb „ ~
1 .:,"'tl
Y
PAGE 3 op 5
POLICT/ADMINISTRATIVE PROC3DVRg/ADM1N1STSATIVE DIBgCTIVB (Coetlnesd}
TITLEr REPEAENCE
TkAVEL EpENSES NUM182. Ol
k e. I'ers U Vehicles with the approval of the department
director, City employees may use their personal vehicles for
out-of-town travel. The City of Denton will pay twenty-five
cants per mile, when an employee has approval to use his or
her personal ar on a trip and the destination is more than
300 miles from the point of departure, the City will OIJ
reimburse the
employee for any expenses (such as lodging and ~
meals) which, in transit, sY.ceed the cost of regular
t
round-trip air coach. Any travel time that is greater than
the time required to travel by schedW ed airlines will be `
considered vacation time, Normal travel will not exceed one
day.
The city will pay for any required mileage at the
destination.
1
The City will pay.for parking oxpenses at the destination,
including airport parking expenses.
i
j if an employee Is driving a personal vehicle outside of the
City and has car "allure, the city will pay the expenae of
towing the vehicle 'ao the nearest garage. The employee must
1p pay for the repair~i.
f. Oitr peh oles gity vehicles may be used according to the
discretion of the department director, Direct expenses,
such as gssoline and oil, associated with the use of such
vehicles will be reimbursc4.
I ~
j
pVA. ,
PAQE 4 OF 5
POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVA (Coatiaaed)
RHFERENCE
TITLE; NUMBER:
TRAVEL &VENSIS 400.01
j
i
g, Parking The City will pay for airport parking squired while
an employee is out of town. At the destination, the City
will also pay required parking fees for personal cars, City
j cars, or canted cars.
i
S. Accommodations
f
a, Hotels The City will pay actual expenses for hotels, motels,
or other lodging. Payment of lodging expenses incurred by an
employee using him or her personal vehicle is covered in
{ Section A.S.s, s
It Y
The City will pay for a single room. If an employee stays in
a room with another person, the employee must adjust the bill
to show the difference in cost,
b. Meals The City will pay for the cost of meals in travel,
The City will not pay for meals for persons who are not
employed by the City of Denton except with the written
approval of the department director. If on exception is
I
t granted, meal receipts should show for whoa the meal was
purchased and the occasion of the meal,
The City will pay for meals at scheduled seminars, training
sessions, and other meetings conductad within the metroplox
area, However, the City will not pay for staff functions
without the prior approval of the department director,
{
#j c. Tela9 one The City of Denton will pay the cost of one
personal phone tail each day. The City will reimburse
3
{i employees for all business calls,
{
1
i
I
1101 1
Mzrm
t D.12-4.11
` PAGE-5 OF S
POLIO?/ADMINISTRATIVE PBOCEDVRE/ADHINiSTRATIVE DIRECTIVE SCeattaaedy i
RBFEREMCE
TiTLe: uM~~~'. O1
TRAVEL MUSES
F
k j
I
d, Incidental Expenses The City of Denton will not pay for dry
cleaning, shoe shines, haircuts, magazines and books,
tickets to the theatre, sports events, or other such
incidental expenses.
i
9. Advances and Reimbursements The City will issue an advance I?ar
estimated travel expenses. Following a trip, employees muss
account for their travel expenses within forty (40) wos-king days s
of the trip, The employee must use the required fa,-As for
advances and reimbursement requests, and the department director
must approve both.
10. Travel on Behalf of Other Agencies With the approval of the
department director, employees may be granted travel time on i
behalf of other organizations, In unusual circumstances, the :
Director of Finance can approve an advance of City funds for y
travel expenses incurred on such trips.
F
I
066sa
f
i
F
DATEt 10/22/91
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
Tot Mayor and Members of the City Council {
PROMI Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECTI ZONING ORDINANCE RE-WRITE
i
RECOMMENDATIONi j
This is a briefing session to inform the Council of the
{I Zoning ordinance Task Force recommended zoning structure and
1 seek Council's issues, concerns and questions concerning the
re-write of the zoning ordinance.
suMMARYt
E
See Attaohment 1.
BACKOROUNDt
See Attachment 2.
t
PROGRAMS. DEP&BTMENTS OR OROtIPS AFFECTEDS
Planning and Development, Zoning ordinance Task Force, and P&Z.
VISC-AL I PACTt
k None.
k
Respeo lly subm tteds
1
Ll d Harrell
Prepared bys City Manager
i
j lot
rank H. obb ne, xecutive 'Lrector
Planning and Development
i
Attaohmentei 1. Memo with 5 enclosures.
2. Chronology and work program.
AXX00046
~i'
17-
NcYVaby}
I` I
I
F
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201
7
MEMORANDUM
i
DATEt October 17, 1991
Tot Mayor and City Council
I
FROMt Frank 11. Robbins, Executive Director
Planning and Development
SU9,7ECTs ZONING ORDINANCE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS
s
The purpose of the work session item is to brief you concerning the Task
Force's recommendation about the structure of the zoning ordinance, and to
9 determine your sense about the direction the zoning ordinance re-write is
taking.
f
The MXD
z
The proposed structure of the ordinance is outlined in Enclosure 1. The most
striking aspect of this structure and approach to public lend use decision
5 making is the importance of the single mixed use district (MXD) .andthe
I standards which would apply within that district. The latest rough draft of
the MXD is Enclosure 2, Most new non-residential and probably a good deal of
new residential zoning would be to MXD. Then, the standards of the ordinance,
rather than the orocesa of rezoning would be the focus of land use decision
making. P&Z has expressed some concern about the seeming lack of notice and
public review associated with the MXD. The Commisaion has asked to meet with
the task force to resolve this issue.
The MXD would operate very roughly like cumulative zoning with standarda,
No community in Texas has adopted this approach, though Houston and Georgetown
are examining variations on the theme outlined in Enclosure 1. Many
communities have among their districts mixed use districts, but none we have
I, found uses only one. The standards we are adopting use bufferyards,
residential adjacenoy standards, site plan triggers and adopted site plan
standards.
See enclosure 3 for the task force's stated benefits of the structure,
eufferyarde (See Enclosure 4) j
i We are relying heavily on Lane Rendlg's famous book Performance Zonlno and the
use of bufferyards to mitigate land use incompatibilities at the edge of
l different uses, ggforMenoe Zoning says,
I
:
8171566.8200 D/PW METRO 434.1529
q
aHANn=cg
i ~ 7f(y®dTd
k~
I~1
Planning and Zoning commission
Octobar 15, 1991
Page 2
"One of zoning's most important functions is the division of land
uses into districts which, at least in theory, contain compatible
uses. All uses permitted in any district have generally similar
nuisance characteristics. in theory, the location of districts
supposed to provide protection, but in practice this is not the case,
aince uses as diverse as single-family, one-acre local highway
commercial uses, and general industrial uses can be and are adjacent
to one another despite the previous (Municipality) zoning ordinance.
i
Bufferyards will operate to minimize the negative impact of any use
on neighboring uses."
"Noted architect Frank Lloyd Wright succinctly capturec' the essence
of the bufferyard concept when he observed that "greenery hides a
multitude of sins," d bufferyard is an area of plantings surrounding
a land use which screens or blocks vision, noise, pollutants, or
other negative by-products associated with that use. Xn the case of
very intense uses abutting considerably lose intense ones, structural
components such as fences or berme may be required of a bufferyard.
Because of the bufferyard requirement, performance zoning is able to
accommodate the values of both the developer and the adjacent
landowner. The developer has considerable flexibility to build at
very different land use intensities on any particular site, but all
neighbors to the development are protected---literally "buffered"--
from the consequences of the more intense use "next. door,"
BBSIDENTIAL ADJACENCY STANDARDS
in addition to bufferyard standards betwenn residential uses and higher
intensity uses, there would be additional requirements, one example of this
is the requirement in the MXD to setback further from residential land, the
higher the adjacent, non-residential building is.
SITE PLAN TRIGGERS
Detailed site plans would be required to be submitted for development which
might be an undesirable land use in some situations, ,lecause one of the
triggers is violation of the Denton Development Plan, development consistent
with adopted land use policy would flow through the regulatory process much
s faster, easier, and cheaper than now. All of our controversial cases reviewed
over the last four years would have triggered on MXD site plan. Detailed site
plans could provide a good informational base for flexible approval of a
development much in tha same way PD's are used today, This trigger is also
indirectly a residential land use protector, because moot of our residential
areas are or will be in the areas where low intensity land use policies apply,
This site plan requirement would operate similarly to a specific use permit,
the difference between a triggered site plan and an SUP might be at what level
the site plan could be approved, P&Z or City council. It is suggested that the
most nuisance prone uses would hava to be approved by SUP, by Council, if in
the MXD, one Heavy Impact (HI) "straight" district is shown in the structure.
A site plan is not required in the HI District, but environmental performance
standards would be applicable.
I
i
4
.V.
P:t1ti
3lYt!5'd~t^
4
!]1
Planning and zoning Commission
October 17, 1991
Page 3
SITE PLAN RULES
All non-residential development and multifamily development would be reviewed
in the context of these rules, (probably) to be adopted in the zoning
ordinance. Many of theme rules have already heen adopted, such as landscaping,
signs, curb outs, and some parking lot layout standards.
During the work session, staff will provide some examples of how the MXD and
its standards might work.
Enclosure 3 is a summary of the benefits of the proposed structure.
Enclosure 5 are the recommendations of the Task Force which we reviewed in May,
i and have been changed with this proposed structure.
/ran 4.
uins A P
dw
Enolosuress 1. Structure
2. MXD
3. Benefits of Structure
4. Bufferyards
5. Previous Task Force Recommendations
AXX00025
t
i
E
6
1
~ r,
j
ENCLOSURE 1
ZONING OADIXXVCE STRUCTURE
I. Zoning Districts
A. Current Zoning Districts and Standards.
1. Not changed, except reformatted to be user
friendly.
2. Applicable to existing Zoning. All current zoning
is "grand fathered".
3. No rezoning to these districts.
h Ia. Mixed Use District (MYD), Host annexation zoning and ;
F non-residential rezoning to MZD. j
1. All uses allowed according to standards
unless site plan or SOP required.
2. Residential adjacency standards.
3. Bufferyard requirements between uses with
different oharactirs. !
4. Public site plan review in certain
situations. "Site plan triggers". Paz
approves. 200 foot notice and public
hearing.
as Master Plan policy violation.
b. Buildings over 130 feet tall,
0. Outside manufacturing, repair, or
salvage.
S. Site plan standard
a. Landscape/Tree Protection/soreeninq
b. Parking lots
0. signs
d. Lighting
6. Specific use permits for the most
environmentally degradative, nuisance prone,
heavy sensory impacting uses. City council f
approves. 200 foot notice and public
hearing.
Impact analysis.
C. Planned Development Districts, No change.
D, b Residential Districts differentiated by density.
j; i. 1 unit or less per core.
!S 2. 1-6 units per acre.
3, 6-12 units per aore.
4. 12 units and more per aore.
s. Mobile Home.
N, Agricultural District for agricultural use. Not a
Y "holding" or interim zoning district,
F, Heavy Impact (HI) Distriot.
s Performance standards for light, noise, and air.
,
{
r:
st
Is
5
w
L
II. Other Provisions
As Special Place Regulations. (Tailored standards),
1. Historic Distriot(s) and Landmarks.
a. Neighborhoods/Stators/Corridors
3. Airport Height and Compatible Uses.
H. Special Rse Regulations.
R ; 1. sexually oriented businesses. I
I! Zs On-premise alcohol consumption.
3. Helipads.
i. Signs.
' s. Accessary uses.
6. Non-conforming uses. i
7. Temporary uses. i
S. Bed and breakfasts.
Co Conditioned Use Zoning. No change.
D. variances and special exceptions.
1
AXX0035 j
i
j
{
,
J
i
.yyN,r. , I
L Fl?.yA
~ i
ENCLOSURE 2
MIXED USE DISTRICT
N1XD
i' PURPOSE,
The Mixed Use (1vIXD) district Is intended to provide nesibility to accommodate a wide range of land uses
on any single parcel or tract of land without adversely impacting surr('unding properties.
Uses permitted within this district Include residential, commercial, industrial, public, Institutional and
recreational uses,
f
& HEIGHT AND AREA STANDARDS FOR NONRESIDENTIAL USES
y Sheet Yard Building Setbacks
i local street 25'
j
I
collector street Min, 25'
arterial street Min, 25' J
s ,
freeway frontage road Min, 40'
Refer to Subdivision and Land Development Regulations for
access standards,
Interior Side and Rear Yard BullWag Setback
Interior Property Line of Nonresidential Uses Abutting Residential Uses: k
• Minimum 15', plus 1' per 2' of height over 17' to a maximum required setback of 300'
- Refer to Bufferyard Matrix
j Commentary to Task Force
11 Bu11''eryard ntatricles are found on pages S • 7. The bufferyards represented are based on standards t
developed by Lane Kendig. These same requirements have been adopted, in various fornts, by several
muntelpalifies duroughouu the country.
Interior Property Line of Nonresidential Uses Abutting Nonresidential Uses:
Refer to Bufferyard Matrix j
I Bufferyards, if required, may be Included In the setback requirements I
Maximum Height
0 No maximum height has been established for any use within this district, except airport height
standards.
0 Any structure over 130' in height shall require site plan review.
,
Additional Use Regulntlons
• Public or private elementary schools shall have access to not less than a collector street.
1
i
Page 2
F
4 »3r tr- I
,M St
j r
• ec>,rkA+.~
r
T;lil•ipl
i
• Other public or private secondary schools (Including denominational) shall have access to not less
than an arterial s(reet.
R • On-premise consumption and package sales for off-promise consumption of alcoholic beverages shall
be permitted only within Classes VI through Xl and In coy ipliance with existing local and State
regulations. (A summary of State regulations are to be llsteu later)
• For uses whose street yard abuts a freeway frontage road, no parking shall be permitted within 40' of
the property line on those sides.
• For nonresidential uses abutting a residential use or district, the noise level shall not exceed the
ambient level as measured at the property line of those residential uses or districts, no maximum
i I sound radiated from a use shall not exceed 65 decibels at the property line.
NOTE, The noise love)[ specified here is based on standards contained In 97he Noise Guidebook,
published by The Environmental Planning Division, Office of Environment and Energy, Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
• Air quality impact analysis required with Specific Use Permit or zoning applications If an ah quality
permit is required.
B, 11E1GIIT AND AREA STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES '
i
Front Yard Setback for Classes I through V, 25' l
Side and rear building setback. 10' between structures
See Bufferyard matrix.
s
Minimum lot size. None t
Height limit. Nate ;
C, SPEC AI, USF. RFCULATIONS
The following uses shall be governed by specific standards supplemental to the standards for the MXD district,
(The regulations shall be developed at a later date) f
Sexually Oriented Businesses
On-Premise Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages
Mobile Homes
Nonconforming use
` Helipads r
D, SITE PLAN "TR1 QERSS"
The following situations shall require site plan review by the Plannh,g and Zoning Commission; 200' notice 1
to property owners; no public hearing unless exceeds 20% rule. Applicant may appeal to the City Council.
I '
1. A use which Violates the policies of the Denton Development Plan (Master Plan),
2. A building which would exceed 1301 In height,
3. Manufacturing, salvage, or repair uses proposed to operate outside of an enclosed building,
F, BUFFFRYARD REGUTATION5 '
d 4
,h is to ensure adequate buffering so to mitigate ,
Bufferyards shall be required to separate uses • the goal of which ,
I
Page 3
f _
t rN [epyyt{'
t ,
IfBYa'fnipy
detrimental effects from noise, dust, lighting, litter, signs, height and bulk of adjacent uses the ultimate goal `
of which Is to improve the quality of life for those living and working In Demon. Uses requiring a bufferyard
shall be determined by the chart under Bufferyard Matr(x,
The planting materials within a bufferyard were calculated to ensure that they do, In fact, function as buffers
and shall be an appropriate landscape design so that the landscaping will form an effective barrier from noise,
g odors, lighting and dust,
,
No part of the bufferyard shall be counted as meeting any part of the landscaping requhement as defined by
Ord. No. (Refer to Sec. except for those areas within the front yard, side and/or
1{ rear yard abutting a thoroughfare, If any. Bufferyards shall not be required within the areas designated as the
front yard and those sides and/or rear yards abutting a thoroughfare. However, the total effect of required
landscaping within the street yards and parking lots, combined with the required buffers, should be one which
is complementary to the overall design of the proposed use and an asset to the community,
t
Bufferyard Desc it ptlon
j d
Bufferyards are in cloven categories. The type of bufferyard is determined by 1) the uses being buffered, and
2) the width and density of the bufferyard (that Is, the effectiveness, of the bufferyard to accomplish the task
l for which it was created).
The following Matrices represent the three intensity areas contained In the Denton Development Plan (ADP),
A proposed development is required to consult the DDP to determine the intensity area the proposed project
will be sited, ,
In order to lessen development cost and provide design alternatives, several options are available which serve
J to provide flexibility. These options Include the installation of solld masonry screens of varying heights, and
berms, p
Afl components of the installed bufferyard shall become the sole responsibility of the owner of the property,
or shared with adjacent property owners by Independent agreement.
Diagrams of the bufferyards are included in the Appendix }
t
M
}
1
R
i
{
3
Page 4
i
~ r~r~an
~ c.xia4s~7
LOW INTENSITY AREAS
BUFFERYARD MATRIX
1
To interpret the following matrix, the proposed use must first be Identified In the Permitted Use Classification,
The same method Is to used to determine uses adjacent to the use proposed. Locate the proposed use In the
left column. Locate each adjacent use In the top column to determine which bufferyard Is required for each
adjacent use.
Buffcryards are divided into eleven types (A • K). The responslblllty for installation of bufferyards shall be
prioritized In the following order:
To be determined
,t
CLASS I II III IV V VI Vlr V111 IX
X XI r
1 « . D F F 0
J K K K
11 C F F F
I J J K rr• ,
Ill ll C « E F F H i
J 3 K ,
IV F F E r D D F H H J
tiV F F E D
F G G I
VI G F 0 D • r D I rr♦ t
Vll J I H F F . r ,
# H K '
VIII K J J H 0 « . i
' E K
IX K J J H 0 p
! « K
X K K K J
j f i H E
i SI r.r rr« rrr 0 4r K K K K +
I ff
None Required ,
See Requirements under Class Xl
Not Permltted within 2,000'
SPECIAL REGULATIONS I
! i
• If a use Is proposing to locate adjacent to an existing use of higher Intensity, or a district of higher 1
intensity, no bufferyard is required.
• A use proposed to locate adjacent to vacant land shall be required to Install a bufferyard assuming
a Class II use will be adjacent.
Page S
1 J4y•
Y F'4'.CJt59!
MODERATE INTENSITY AREAS
BUFFERYARD MATRIX
To Interpret the following matrix, the proposed use must first he Identified in the Permitted Use Classification.
The some method Is to used to determine uses adjacent to the use proposed. Locate the proposed use in the
left column. Locate each adjacent use in the top column to determine which bufferyard Is required for each
adjacent use.
i ,
Hufferyards are divided Into eleven types (A • K). The responsibility for Installation c F bufferyards shall be
priorltlzed In the following order:
To he determined
j CLASS I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X Xi
I I + » E E E H K K K
I[ + + « D F E G J J K aa+
III + + a + C D F J J K
IV E D * * C C D H H J
V E P E C + « + G G 1 a*+
Vii H G P D a » » + a D K
VIII K J J H G + s » , D K
t IX K J J H G D » + + a «
X K K K J I I D D
LJ XI a+a a++ ++s K K » » a
I
i
* None Required
See Requirements under Class XI
Not Permitted within 2,WO'
SPECIAL REGULATIONS
j • If a use Is proposing to locate adjacent to an existing use of higher Intensity, or a district of higher
Intensity, no bufferyard Is required. r
f ~
• A use proposed to locate adjacent to vacant land shall be required to Install a bufferyard assuming
a Class II use will be adjacent.
Page b
i
i
y ♦ (~ygyf~Y
1
SPECIAL PURPOSE ACTIVITY CENTER AREAS
BUFFERYARD MATRIX
t'
To Interpret the following matrix, the proposed use must first be Identlfled in the Permitted Use Classification,
The same method Is to used to determine uses adjacent to the use proposed. Locate the proposed use In the
left column. Locate each adjacent use in the top column to determine which bufferyard Is required for each
adjacent use, e
t
i
Bufferyards are divided into eleven types (A • K). The responsibility for installation of bufferyards shall be
prioritized In the following order;
5 To be determined
CIASS 1 11 Ill IV V VI VII VIII IX x XI
E I + D D D C D E F F
II + . • + C C D E E F
111 0 + + + C B D D E g
1V D + . + + « C D E F
j
V D C C • • ' C C C E
1
j VI C C B + « + . + + «
VII D D D C C ' • + + • K tt
i VIII E E D D C • + + , K
j IX F F E E C * + + + + K i
EK
i( X F F F F' E ' + • + EK
XI K K K f
• None Required
See Requirements under Class XI
Not Permitted within 2,000'
SPECIAL w.GULAn0NS
f
• If a use is proposing to locate adjacent to an existing use of higher intensity, or a district of higher
intensity, no bufferyard is required.
• A use proposed to locate within these areas, but adjacent to a Low Intensity Area, shall be required
to Install a bufferyard assuming a Class II use will be adjacent, if that area Is vacant,
• A use proposed to locate within these areas, but adjacent to a Moderate Intensity Area, shall be
required to install a bufferyard assuming a Class IV use will be adjacent, if that area is vacant,
Page 7
ME 111
CIASS I USE
Use In this class represent estate type residential.
• Residential less than I D,U./Ac,
• Parks excluding stadiums, lighted ball fields and other organized sport or recreation facllllies,
♦ Farm and ranch operations.
CLASS 11 USES
Use in this class represent low density residential,
• Residential between I and 599 D,U,lAc.
• Parks excluding stadiums, lighted ball fields and other organized sport or recreation facilities.
CLASS III USNS
Uses In this class represent moderate density residential uses,
• Residential between b and 11,91 D.U./Ac,
• Public Parks
CLASS IV USES
Uses In this class represent high density residential uses,
.I ,
• Residential greater than 12 D.U,IAc,
• Special residential (dormitories, boarding house, nursing home, retirement home, halfway houses) f
♦ Day Care, Kindergarten or Day Camp
• Structures used for religious gatherings
CLASS V USES
3
z` • Manufactured Housing
• Mobile Home Parks
• RV Parks i
CLASS V1 USES ?
i
Uses In this class present the possibility for nuisance factors such as noise from traffic, hours of operation
and lighting.
i !
• ProfessionaUAdministralive Offices (Including clinics)
R • ConrmerclallRerali Sales less than 5,000 square feet
• Personal Services
• Studios (health, recreation and cultural exhibition)
• Private or Public Primary or Secondary Schools
i t
! CLASS VII USE$
Uses In this category represent high traffic generators, Other factors could Include, but not limited to later
night noise from emergency vehicles, lighting and Increased pedestrian traffic,
• Hospitals (Including behavioral and chemical dependency treatment)
♦ Hotels/Motels ,
• Universities and Colleges
• Private Business/Technical Schools
♦ Commerclal/Reiaii sales less than 25,000 SF
• Automobile Repair and related enterprises (no outdoor operations)
Page 8
1
q
V.
a
I
• New and Used Automobile and Marine Sales and Service
• Medical and Scientific Research and Development (all operations enclosed)
i
CLASS Vlll USE
Uses In this category have the potential for odors from food preparation and concentrated noise from public
gatherings,
S
• On-Site Food Preparation (whore possibility of external odors exist)
' 0 Commercial/Retail Sales less than 250,OW square feet
i • Indoor Commercial Amusement
Wholesale and Commercial Sales
1
• Outside Storage
CLASS IX uses
Uses In this category Include those uses which, us a function of the primary or accessory use, require access
to not less than urterlal•classed streets, Nuisance factors Include lighting, fumes and noise from vehicles,
In addition, these uses require large amounts or impervious,
Warehouse and Distribution
• Vehicle Sales and Repair greater than 10,000 lb, axle wefghl
a Light Assembly
• Corn merclaI/Re[all Sales less than 500,000 square feet
f ,
CLASS X USES
Uses In this category Include those uses which, as a function of the primary or accessory use require
to not less than arterial-clussed streets, use, access
t t
In addition, nuisance factors represent potential for noise from heavy equipment, concentrated noise from
public gatherings, odors from rood preparation and vehicle fumes, Increased traffic from residential vehicles
and heavy trucks and possible late night hours,
k • Healy L'pufpmeni Storage (outdoor)
• Heavy Assembly
a 0 Light Manufacturing
• Outdoor Commercial Amusement
( • Fairgrounds or Rodeos i
• Stables or Kennels for Livestock or Domestic Animals (with outside runs or pens)
a CommerclaURelall Sales over 500,000 square feet
e C4 S_qx USM9
z.
'rho following uses have nuisance factors which have been identified as requiring special use regulations, The
proposed development of any of these uses shall require a Specific Use Permit to be approved by the City
Council at a public hearing This will be preceded by a notice to property owners within 2,OMI. Applicant
may appeal Council decisions to the Hoard of Appeals,
These uses shall Include, but not limited tot
Concrete or Asphalt Batch Plants
Smelling or separating raw natural walerinis
Manufacturing from raw natural materials `
7
e Page 9
}
,
N!aW
r
s,, ~Ri{t+
d
f
Manufacturing from petroleum related products
Subsurface extraction of natural resources
'i Storage of junk or abandoned vehicles (except police or police contracted impound yard)
Food Processing
Land Fills
Wastewater Reclamation
Correction Facilities
Airports or Heliports
i ~
t
~i
i
i
ti t
3 r ;t
r
i y
cc Y
fi
~t
i
l
{t page 10
i
155 .Kwr
OPOgfION E
q 401
NIN Proposed District
r J Boundary
a
------..._J- , Existing District MATCH UNF _
Boundary
INSET
i ly
1+
' Precinct BOLHdary
d
Precinct Split
417
.
a..
i
l
ar ~ ~Odd, 1~~
w.. S r r • 4i 4 1 1 r5 vl w f e ~~A ~.r~ _ r I III/ iI r.wr w ~ rJK ~ ♦ 35♦
rr ! 1 - .M C 7P. 1.5..fL f. ~ ~ ! Cam,
Sri
mom N I
, '1 ~'r I \ - I ~ ~ b' ~_Ir'♦q ' j j ♦ 1'. ,1,„ 111 •r r',: I •r n~ t, J' ~ II _
- ~J J ~Y
LL A~
Mrs -MJY ~ ~ 1
r •
~ II
~ I f
.-M 1 I I t
i I ' l . Jti r~ r / Irll! 11
405 S .a,4 loin i--.r _ ~-k,P 1 w. a~ 4 r - nn,• ~I '',~a . \
I f • MY
w. .I_~, I .ITTTil ~rrr\~~-+~, r. 6 ~ }
?lQ5
, Low
I
11 &ASL
I _Al 1
h - - jY1[1[ V w. 7 1~
' ~1r 1 on
1 JI i I ✓ r I t { t
I,
I 415, , 1 ; , 4~n Mr1)r 416
1 d 1S
t r ,1. W, A,
to.
x /
1 ,
y 1
l i I , i JT' lr 1 a i t ~
1
16 Ali I , •w.r V ~t ~ ,i I~I ~I
41;1' ~ / ,
r V"
4!2 , y 412 law
, I , I ~:I ~~11 1 I
r 1
,
1 l~ ( ~r _ s4
S~ Ld
tir
~l i.::..
r.r
~ n
~r1S.
T y~.~:
~i r_
,~M ,...E
Yz
ail
Y ~ T~.
' s
'1~.
} f.
t
~t~
i
Determination of Buffer
The following prrrcedure must be followed in order (or a
developer in &now what bufferyard will be required at all 1 AnIACENTEMISTggaAgg= USE
petimelers of a she:
1. An adjoining uses must be Idenllfkd. This Information
should be recorded on the she plan.
2. The land use Intensity class of each adjoining use nsusl be VACANI t
' IdenlHkd. The table of land use iMemhy classilicatiun LAND hI
performance standards (Section 4602 of the model otdi-
nonce) must be consulted for this; detenvrlnatkm, part of
this lable (for commercial and resfdemial used h shown, P""W USE
CLAW Z
.1. 1 he proposed use and ks land use intrmshy must be skter• ~AxbJM ENT
mined, The table or require) bufkryards nant Then be a~g T
consuhed to determine Ike letter designation of the buf• USE
feryatd required between the proposed use, tl6!
4. The tulleryard in be used Is selected from al lease three
f ohet aiives. The landowner chocron the option whose T
' mix of At)1ACHe1 COlLEC10Fi3TiEF11>1f314T OF NMY
plant material, distance, and structures 6es1 rector(
the requbtmeMs of Ike site.
asesorea UM
3. v" CIO" Aaledenf "hwW I.aarl klw CIdin- 4
j I It III IV V Vf Vol YMI IM g
I m ne M M Ay As As fto now
mass nos
H As E C 0 D E 0 N I J -
Fr-awE) PIANt LIP is/W
Ire Ae C a 0 0 E D N I J
V 4 4M rtes!
IV As 0 C ■ 0 E a tt I J
1311>ta
6
Urderssor frees ~y
h 0 b D none mono C 0 E E terra r'roelr W (epi
VI M E E IF nary mass moor C 0 0 ■e Strbs q T
7 - F
VM nrrr D 0 0 C tsetr tsar moos C C 1•! frerpere6R7on4xs W
VIII tryetrrsry rA.l%l
rare N N M D C mate rsree mar ■
BUFFEWARD G
i` ..1f:,Y.A+c..... ..'d, i.. . . . _ ...._w+Y b(yr 61 .;a4.x n•h. bti iii{c-4#Aa4H:3!+rw'ca!>~/
1
h
EXAMPLE BUFFERYARAS
from
Lane Kendig Performance Zoning
1
I F
r ' "t5t
I
rr
fT I 1
s
10.
` #A
l
t
' l
I
14
3
I u.fnkvy ire t Lk*sby R.,, O
3 WM O ~°w rUSe / 9n~s O I"m W '
t"VewwCoAn
-bRPp.
ia. Diu. „M,,rww,
BUFFE.R'1(ARp C BUFFERYARD d
162
.s3
r
s r ti? r
i
e ) 0%0
} ~ O~ N
j RE<UXD aver UW3 M
NEOIIIED aNer 111r9! 07 ~ F2 F'
t
p ' `r o" Has
s us*rsay H.a t
• stn" o w.. WT u. a,Mnbrr Has 0
cr.y.raco:4, • •a - F, es 9,nAS o u.. ; w
BUFFER1(ARD E BUFFERYARD F
2a ;
fN ;
] S
'y
I
r ~
f
_ m_
Ittz
~ ~ ~ a _ I 91i co'
i
RgF[D PtkM V+I I
,
?S I M f
.75 7.9 UFdPligry OM 0
A caw" We"
ao No O Imo, W
• Ik.t,,skxy T,rc U«r ~y.~ W 1
{ INw H.,,1.IM ILfw K.MI liV
S' RIJFFERYAM G BUFFER1lARD N
a
I
I Y6r:wt_1a-
ae
s
pbwd
MOWAW
v OR
I i s r" F.
elmd
_ d'
yl
BI
OR
1 F3 F
owl
75 F6 a CAVM Tma
• IIdrMQY Too" O M Uds.~b'Y troe+ -
4w/r.M~IM Y 9hlb O
I 36,%w*
Y~ R
C 6 1 F6 fl cwvlw,vcar/e+ •
li M E~wpee~,C~r.rf •
~lyei .r.el.IM lyw ►/wMrw
BUFFS (YARD I BUFFERYARD J
r
1~6 I
i
1
44
a. ,
f
i
7 awl
f 4 ~
~ Fb
nECU~o a,wr acre i co
e BIJF~-~RYARb S,
FwaLwb CUNT 1N18, w
10 (w"
~ ud..wiY tills, 0 {
so 9aM Q 9
f BVM,~ ac~~+EE, narrt u+rs i oo f
"no, V~
RYARD K M FFE WARD
1~4 e, r~ ~lF/ ib14.~.4riF~"iTixrMS..r:r
1
I BYMKX HEN"
E ~
Wmd ftida -
srWai f+fiaHt wTCfwi
B, it EAM
F7 48 J~ 6t
_ B, e.
VAW FW
e.
F g
~ wma er~aa.
I IL
sr+aa
BW, K BEf~N NY8' MA90NFYY NNI.I.
F6 9 M% 6' BfJ I M! 7' MA9~7tiiY YM1LL
Fs B'
e' BERM Mf' 8' N1~90PiN 4Y41
BVII3
Wan wr
ifondCorm*,C WWOO.M.WtkMci
{
. ' .._.r,.:....~~r..v [~s.n..a #w•fi@K NN~t4`e+t1J V.~n~ 1i3A
i
a
F. SPECIFIC USE PERMIT
Class xI uses.
G. STREET &C-MS STANDARDS
Standards to be developed which would preclude nonresidential traffic from
j traveling through residential areas but would require "immediate access" to
collector or larger streets for most nonresidential uses. "Immediate Access"
does not necessarily mean a curb cut or driveway access,
y 1
t'
s
i
i
1
i
i
l
17.
II
f.r
ENCLOSURE 3
TO: Members of Zoning Task Force
FROM: Steve Fanning
SUBJECT: Proposed zoning ordinance as outlined in Sept. 9, 1991, memo
I support the proposed ordinance in concept, particularly the MXD district,
I feel that if the details are drafted with the same flexibility as the concept, Denton will
have a zoning ordinance with many unique quairtles.
Better for
I ` Developers
• Developers will be subject to fewer arbitrary and/or political decisions,
` • Devekopmertts wig be more market driven Instead of zoning driven.
f i
4 I • Less time will be needed to process a development proposal.
I
i The developer will know the rules up front.
• The developer will know that he/she will be treated the same as the
competition,
f'
• The applicant has some choices In the type of regulator process (i.e, the MXD
district can be used, or the applicant can choose the more time consuming and
r more uncertain ad hoc process like the P,D. District).
Better for the Public in Gem ral:
• A process that encourages less Individual politkad decisions wgl, conversely,
encourage more decisions made for the good of she city as a whole,
f • The MXD zoning district will give low Income areas similar land use protoobw
as the high Income areas.
• The proposed zoning concept of situation (or performance) standards should
encourages more quality development,
• The MXD zoning process Itself will ald In a more owalstent Implementation of
j the City's Compreher*is Plan, compared to the traditional zoning cor4apt,
The tradkkxW zoning concept tends to be Inconsistent over a long period of
I time, since it Is dependent on Individuals Implementing cltywide concepts on a
I case by case site specift basis.
• Eoonomko activity will be stimulated since actual development will be
I encouraged, as opposed to traditional zoning which rewards only securing the
r zoning for possible development.
s
!Rr•ehlMll•
18.
f t
1
The concept as proposed looks good, but we W4 need to follow through and insure
the details meet the spirit of the concept.
1
For example, a couple of keys:
• Limit, in the zoning administration process, the number of times public
bodieslstaff are required to make open ended ad hoc decisions,
The ordinance needs s i
• peclflc standards and less arbitrary decisions but always i
l have the means to accommodate unique situations, (We cannot write
standards for all sduatlons, for all properties, for all time,) However, eliminate
as, much as possible, multi variance procedures (I.e. RD, conditional zoning),
The ordlnanco needs at least one good practical procedure but not necessarily
multiple procedures,
I feel the City has an excellent staff that are more than capable to write the details that
wIM accomplish our Intent. Therefore, I would urge your support In moving forward
i with the proposed concept
l
i
r
I
i
f
19.
1
,
I Es l
Purpose
It is obvious that bufferyards provide visual barriers which block ® ® O
out the glare of lights, signs, and other visual nuisances. In addl-
lion, planted buffers function in two ways to block noise. 1
Distance and plant materlal reduce the inzenaly of noise, and ACCESS
wooded areas iniroduce the background sounds of trees, wind,
anal birds. While these background notes do not actually reduce
j noise, they make it less noticeable and therefore less annoying.
Duffers also shield the sourn of the noise from view, which lends
to distract allenlion from the nuisance and thereby mintml:es Its
perceived Impad. They may alw serve as a protective or saloiy r
j barrier, Insofar as they block physical passage. Finally, relatively
{ heavily planted buifers reduce air polhdlon, dust, dirt, and filler.
Greenery In urban areas may make important contributions to
boiler air and aid Improvements of water quality,
NOISE
'
o
,
N,
LIGHT & GLARE
AiR E'OLLUTION .
1,
I
11
I
t
1
,
l
Flexibility
The bufferyard must be flexible. A single standard lot all uses or CONSTANT BUFFERYARD
even for any given pair of uses can both impose unnecessary
hardship on the developer of a particular parcel and also lead to
monotony. Within each class of buileryard, a developer may
choose from several options. Because different land values and
I plant material coals are introduced, the developer is given Ilex-
Ibility to make cost tradeoffs In deciding which option to select.
Depending on the sire of the parcel, this flexibility may become so it,
i
extremely relevant. As shown in live accompanying illustration, !
even a narrow bufferyard can Impose a considerable developmen-
tal constraint on a small site, On a large parcel, however, the
developer will lose little buildable land.
.7dr
N 38% buildable 69% buildable
r
1
p~ m
MAJOR DIFFERENCE-LARGE BUFFER
n~ '~y'iiljljr~•:~1J71S SAS vilij.lf l~l:1 ~1~ ~I
SMALL DIFFERENCE-SMALL BUFFER 89% buildable
47
r
1
T_ IMP
i
i
Variables
There are four basic variables In the bufferyard design: distance, plant more and denser planting Is required between a residential use and an In-
material, plant density, and land forms. A combination of all these factors dusisial use than between a residential and small office use. In the case of
was used to develop each bufferyard required by the ordinance and, be- an extreme disparity between adjacent land uses, structural bufferyard
cause each element performs a different function, a different combination elements such as walls or berms may be required.
of elements is specified for different juxtapositions of uses. For example, far
1 ;
4 A\~TJ i
p
e'
' N
i
ilr • ,
I
DISTANCE
PLANT MATERIAL
i
UGLY lON
PLANT INTENSITY
r `
i
G 1
j
,
LAND FORMS
18
k
S
1
REKAININ4 BUFFERYARD ISSUES
13 Oct 91
1. Do young, short, thin plants provide enough buffering I
early enough to be effective compatibility makers?
2. The current bufferyard standards exceed the standards
for some recently adopted PDIS.
3. When the property lines of different uses are offset,
the bufferyard may not cover the entire backyard of the
less intense neighbor.
4. A larger buff eryard may be required even though the size
of the building is 1 square inch larger than the next
lower class.
3
5. Should alternative bufferyards be allowed?
What criteria should be used to evaluate them and for
variances?
Should variances be allowed at all, given the wide range
I of options and the bufferyards significance in ?
mitigating externalities? a'
5a. What bufferyard should be required to use an existing
building? $
6. There is no wall/fence only option.
i
AXX0042/5
i
~ f
k '
{
i
r
1 '
}
ENCLOSURE 5
ZONING ORDINANCE TASK FORCE
RECOMMENDATIONS
i. Create 'user friendly" document.
2, Add standards and narrow the list of uses in some zoning
districts. The new standards would more precisely
regulate the character of development.
3. Create new, less intense commercial and industrial
districts with varying scales of development intensity.
1
4. Adopt conditioned zoning to enable site specific, easy,
fine tuning of development to the specific site. (Under
consideration.)
5. Develop performance standard based, intensity sensitive,
mixed use districts that would enable a more direct 4 ,
relationship between comprehensive plan policy and ,
zoning district standards.
6. Develop overlay standards for special places, such as
around the airport, along arterial corridors, for flood
plains and forests, and in the central business district,
7. Amend the PD article to enable a closer relationship
between the public review process and the private
development process. (Adopted) II
8. Procedural
l
a. Review drafts with Planning and Zoning and Council I
before holding public hearings.
b. Make notice by mail to affected landowners and
enablo their comment before changing standards or
processes of the zoning di~jtricts that they own.
i
3227&/3
i
i
;t 23.
ATTACHMENT 2
ZONING ORDINANCE REWRITE
CHRONOLOGY AND WORK PLAN #15
OCTOBER 13, 1991
IIJ
1
WH N
WHAT W-HO
October 16, 1990
~ I Appointed Zoning Task Force
I 1st TF Meeting November 6, 1990
€ 2nd TF Meeting November 19, 1990
* Mission, tasks,
Article 12 discussion
3rd TF Meeting December 61 1990
* ApprovCi amending Art. 11
and adding mixed Use
Buildings
3anuary 17, 1991
4th TF Meeting
* Discussed various zoning
techniques, outdoor
Amusement District,
Conditional Uses, Truck
Parking in SF districts,
and sign ordinance status.
t City council February 51 1991
* New PD Article adopted.
5th TV Meeting February 7, 1991
* Continued discussion of
zoning techniques.
* Reviewed two actual zoning
cases. Considered the concept
of conditioned zoning.
* Discussed work program.
6th TF Meeting February 21, 1991
* Endorsed Conditioned Zoning.
* Discussed review of minor
amendments.
Discussed reviewing big pictuse.
March 7, 1991
7th TF Meeting
* Discussed piecemeal amendments.
* Discussed zoning techniques.
i
i
V
s
T"-
ay.n - rdtLti:isB
r,
Zoning OrdinanLe Task Force Work Plan
Page Two
F
WHO SOFTEN
5 8th TF Meeting March 21, 1991
* strip commercial
1i discussion
{ City Council April 2, 1991
! * sign Ordiance amendments
adopted.
9th TF Meeting
* Compared and discussed April 4, 1991
zoning ordinance techniques. I
* Discussed situational zoning
standards and policy statements.
10th TF Meeting April 18, 1991
* Discussed requiring site plans
in "straight" districts.
* Discussed notice to zoning
district landowners.
* Discussed "grandfathering",
rezoning Denton, and amending
zoning district standards.
* Made preliminary recommendation.
11th TF Meeting May 2, 1991
* Review new standards.
* Discussed new standards for
new and existing districts.
* Discussed performance zoning.
* Discussed site plan requirements,
City Council May 7, 1991
* Briefing on preliminary
recommendation.
€ Planning and Zoning commission May 8, 1991
* Briefing on preliminary
recommendation.
12th TF Meeting May 16, 1991
* Office districts reviewed.
Current standards compared
to otherls. i
.1
p}
~ r
1
Zoning ordinance Task Force Work Plan
Page Three
HATQ ALA
City Council May 21, 1991
* Accessory Uses adopted.
* Conditioned Zoning approved.
13th TF Meeting June 6, 1991
* Continued office district
discussion.
* Reviewed current and other's
standards for commercial/
retail districts.
* Launched into review of one
non-residential district.
14th TF Meeting June 20y 2991
* Received one district options
I and residential adjacency.
City Council June 25, 1991
* OAR adopted.
Staff Meeting July 1.81 1991
* Reviewed zone structure options.
15th TF Meeting August 1, 1991
* Discussed one district option.
* Some comparison with other options
discussed.
Staff/Invited TF August 150 1991
* Reviewed some conclusions about
using one district.
Continued discussion of one
district and its standards.
s
16th TF Meeting September 5, 1991
* Present the one-district option
with 11 categories for bufferyards.
* Discuss "site plan triggers."
* Propose 4 residential districts,
1 Mixed Use District, 1 high impact
district, and special place and use
regulations.
j
fit,
r
i
i~
I
j
Zoning Ordinance Task Force Work Plan
0 Page Four
i
(WHAT WHO WHEN i
27th TF Meeting September 19, 1991
Made recommendation
to P&Z and City Council.
Planning and Zoning commission October 9, 1991
* Review Task Force FRANK
recommendation.
18th TY Meeting October 17, 1991
* Discuss P&Z issues. FRANK
* Alternative bufferyard rules STEVE
* Test cases
city Council October 22, 1991
* Review TF recommendations FRANK
Begin meetings with developers, FRANK
Governmental Affairs,
neighborhood groups.
October 23, 1991
Planning and Zoning commission
Discuss structure
Joint Planning and Zoning/Zoning OrdinanceFRAN
K October 24, 1991
Task Force Meeting
19th TF Meeting November 7, 1991
* Zoning Ordinance Outline. STEVE
* Review site plan standards. KAREN
* Test cases. FRANK j
20th TF Meeting November 21, 1991
* Begin discussion of special KAREN
use standards,
Single Family uses and
students.
- Family care facilities
and group homes.
G
w',' C1 '°tnrR
I
I
Zoning ordinance Task Force Work Plan
Page Five
WHAT WHO WHEN
f - Sexually oriented business.
- on-premise alcohol sales.
- Accessory uses.
Temporary use regulations.
* Special place and use standards. STEVE
- Historic Districts
- Neighborhood preservation/
revitalization concept STEVE
21st TF Meeting Decembex 5, 1991
* Parking standards for vehicles KAREN
and bikes.
* Industrial/Sensory Performance STEVE
standards.
Noise
Tight
Air
* Non-conforming uses. STEVE
22nd TF Meeting January 16, 1992
* Airport Zoning Authority HARRY
and standards.
* Mobile home regulation. KAREN
23rd TF Meeting February 6, 1992
* Special place and use rules. STEVE
* "A" and residential district
standards. STEVE
24th TF Meeting February 20, 1992
* Definitions STEVE
* Variance criteria KAREN
k * Pulling it all together. HARRY
1992
25th TF Heating March 19,
* Review draft ordinance HARRY
Planning and Zoning Commission April 8, 1992
Hold a public hearing and work
session to discuss the ordinance.
Planning and zoning Commission April 22, 1992
Hold a public hearing and consider FRANK i
ordinance.
E
1Y
i
r
9
i
Zoning ordinance Task Force Work Plan
Page Six
4Vt1 WHO WHEN
c
t City Council April 28, 1992 3
Work Session on ordinance FRANK
City Council
Hold a public hearing and consider FRANK May 19, 1992
ordinance.
}
t
1
i
i a
M
1
AXX00013 f A
i
RiiYFr x
4 I
{
! "OPTION Page 3
,
i
POPULATION DISTRIBUTION
DISTRICTS TOTPOP %OF WHITE PERCENT BLACK PERCENT HISPAN PERCENT
TOTAL
DISTRICT 1 17032 25,70 11385 66.84% 2830 16,62% 2304 13,53%a
DISTRICT 2 16392 24.74 13830 84.37% 1233 7.52% 1051 6,41%
DISTRICT 3 16879 25.47 13260 78.56% 1278 7.57% 1486 8.80%
DISTRICT 4 15967 24.09 13493 84.51% 865 _ 5.42% 1096 6,86%
CITY TOTAL 66270 100 .51968 78.42% 6206 9136% 5937 8,96%
E"
I
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1REDIST} 22-Oct-01 11.17
t
I
.
s
f
I
i
a
i
t
I
w . ~Vol
1
rv y. Mcullib3{
A
r
Page 5
OPTION D
I
POPULATION DISTRIBUTION _
i
WHITE PERCENT BLACK TEIkCENT ERCENT i
O]gT]t]Cs TOTPOP % OF HISPAPI
TOTAL
DISTRICT 1 17223 25.99 11147 64.72% 2956 17.16% 2308 13.400o'
DISTRICT'2 16574 25.01 14441 87.13% 929 5.61% 956 5.77%
'I DISTRICT3 15726 23.73 12682 80.64% 1211 7.70% 1286 8.18%
DISTRICT 4 16747 25.27 13698 81.79% 1110 6.63% 1387 3.28%
CITY TOTA 66270 100.00 51968 78.42% 6206 9.36% 5937 8,96% 1 '
i
1
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (FIEDISTJ 22-00t-91 11:44
i
t
i
i
1
{
i
L
x;KI w, ~i lI
Fl
r
i t~ Page 6
"6PTION E ;
- POPULATION DISTRIBUTION
i
D11TRIM TOTPOP Yo OP' WHITE PERCENT BLACK ERCENT HISPAN ERCENT i
TOTAL
DISTRICT 1 16819 25.38 10071 59.88% 3242 19,289o' 2534 15.07%
DISTRICT2 16574 25.01 14441 87.13% 929 5.61% 956 5.77%
i DISTRICT 3 16829 25.39 13511 80.28% 1277 7.59% 1488 8.84% {
ii DI° I'RICT 4 16048 24.22 13945 86,90% 758 4,72% 959 5.98%
I CITY TOTA 66270 100.00 51968 78.42% 6206 9.36% 5937 8.96%
JJ
i~
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT {REDIST} 22-Oct-91 11;47
4
I
t
t
t
`I
1
i