Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-18-1992 z i ti Agenda No. Agenda Ifeln AGENDA [blo CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL February 18, 1992 /7' Work Session of the City of Denton February 18, City Council on Tuesday, Hall, 1992 at 5:15 P.M. in the Civil Defense Room of City 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the foil;>,'ing items will be COnstdcred: NOTEt Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may F also be Considered as part Of the Agenda for the Regular session, 5:15 P.M. ° 1. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sea, 2(e), Art, 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Consider action in Texairast© ana e of Den or , g~Lys. city 2. Consider action in C~~p,s cif, ` B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Discussion of acquisition of land for recreational facilities. C, Personnel/Beard Appointments Under Sec, 2 6252-17 V.A.T.S. (g), Art, 1. Consider appointments to the Building Code Board, Cable T. V. Advisory Board, the Plumbing and Mechanical Code Board and the Airport Advisory Board, NOTE: Following the completion of the Executive Session, the Council will convene the Work Session in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which thn following items will be considered: 1. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the city/s capital Improvement Plan and budgeting process, 2. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the establishment of a University Students Advisory Committee and give staff direction. t t y I t ~'danda No DO A()andd Ilom._ . City of Denton city Council Agenda Will n-- February 18, 1992 ju Page 2 Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, February 18, 1992 at 7:00 P.M. in the Council. Chambers of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: 7:00 p.m. ' 1. Pledge of Allegiance and the minutes 2 Consider 21, roval February 4, 01992 cangtherSpecialnCall Y Session of January 26, 1992. 3. Resolution of Appreciation for Raymond Short. 4. Citizen Reports A. Receive a citizen report from J. Quinn Brishwi regarding federal/city revenue sharing. 5. Public Hearings public he&ring with regards to the A. aHold a nnexation of 23,059 acres located on Forrestridgeproposed Drive, north of Ryan Road. B. Hold a public hearing and consider the preliminary r.eplat of 4.082 acres, being Lot 1-R, Block 9 of the Alex Robertson hddition from Lot 1, .289 acres of Jennette Street right-ofwway and approximately 3.538 acres of unplatted land. The site is at the northeast corner of Crosstimbers and Mill Streets, adjacent to the Union Pacific Railroad. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-0 at its February 12, 1992 meeting.) 6. Consent Agenda Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. v. I z, Y r Agenda Itom Urfa _,21 a City of Denton Citl Council Agersda February a.8, 1992 UI~ Page 3 Listed below are bids and purchases orders to be approved for Detailed back- payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. up information is attached to the ordinances ((AgenallowsCoUnail This listing is provided on the consent Agenda to royal of the Members to discuss or withdraw an item prior to app Consent Agenda. A. Bids ajid Purchase orders: 11 I%FSP 71`1317 - Laser printerVan (Item #5 only) 2. Bid #1311 - Pickup 3. Bid #1318 - Aerial BuckeDevice 4, Bid #1319 - Medical Supplies 5. Bid #1328 - Pavement Patching Machine B. Tax Refunds consider approval of a tax refund to First State Bank of Denton for. $1,585.29. 2. Consider approval of a tax refund to United Title Company for $508.E7. 3, Consider approval of a tax refund to wise county Title company for $614.01. 7, ordinances A. consider adoption and awarding ordinance a contract for purchasei sealed of sealed proposal materials, equipment, s,zpplies or services. (5.A,1. - RFSP #1317) D. Consider adoption of o contract ordinance for purchase ofcmateri~als, bid and awarding equipment, supplies or services. (5.A.2. - Bid #1311, 5.A.3. - Bid #1318, 5.A.4, - Bid #1319, 5.A.5. - Bid #1328) C• election to adoption iheldii.n an ordinance the City of D ntona Texas, ongMay 2, 1992, for the purpose of electing council members to the City council of the City of Dent n , Texas to Places 5 & 6 and electing a Mayor to Place 7) ordering ^hat the punch card electronic voting system adopted by Denton county be used in said election) designating voting places and appointing election officials; providing for election surnplies) and providing for notice of said election. 4" A f ~ganaa r~o. ~ DDS. Agenda Ilottl City of Denton City Council Pgenda Lilo February 18, 1992 Page 4 0. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a settlement agreement and release between the City of Denton and Washington National Insurance Company. E. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute an amendment to a wholesale water supply agreement between the City of Denton and the Town of Corinth, Texas. (The Public Utilities 'ioard recommend) approval.) 8. Resolutions A. Consider approval of a resolution approving revised city policies regulating smoking and the use of smokeless tobacco products by City employees. B. Consider approval of a resolution approving the G'.0E Southwest Extended Aroa Service for the Denton exchange and authorizing the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. 9. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. 10. Official, Action on Executive Session items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 11. New Business This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 12. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Consider action in Texas Waste Manau~_}Ls. C g Denton. 2. consider action in gill jg2 e._v_+. _Ci:ty. B. Real Estate Under Sec, 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Discussion of potential acquisition of land for recreational facilities. C v. s Agenda No, AgOndOllen) City of Denton City Council Agenda flo !eU February 18, 1992 J!s' Page 5 C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Consider appointments to the Building Code Board, Cable T. V. Advisory Board, the Plumbing and Mechanical Code Board and the Airport Advisory Board. 2, Consult with Municipal Judge regarding goals and objectives for 1992, NOTEt THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT IS LEGALLY PERMrSSIBLE. C E; R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the city Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1992 at o'clock (a.m.) (P.m.) - CITY SECRETARY ACCOOO42 NOTE; THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IS ACCESSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS P THE HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HO-'RS IN ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING. PLEASE CALL T'iX CITY SECRETARY'S OFFIECE AT 566-8109 OR USE TELECOMMUNICA:'IONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) 3Y CALLING 1-800-RELAY-9X SO THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CP.N BE SCHEDULED TtIROUGH THE CITY SECRETARYOS OFFICE. r. Y i M1k r CITY COUNCIL r 0 °°°°00a Q V C O C C O O O JO° r. F i ' v I ULY-=91L REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council r~li5 S Qc_~ior, cTiO.ri~ ~D II 4 ~~a1Lt,1~C11 a~,ti,! FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Potential Purchase of Land Aq p~ ondn No. $ (COMMENDATION: Dile Receive report and give direction. I.3 61MMABY: U ti The City has a unique opportunity to purchase a large tract of land. Staff would like to discuss this item with you at the meeting. See staff report. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTj_QR,~33 QPSS -AEFM U: See staff report, EMAL IMPACT: Soo staff report. RESPECT~FII.LY SUBMITTED: Llo d V. Harrell /r City Manager / 0"I", red by: Steve Brinkman Title: hector of Parks and Recreation Appro f~ Nam • et y McKe title: Exece ',to h ector P Mur al Service ,,~F .nncm~ Developmant ABB00076 ,I t,. S~ l Agonda iiort_ CITY of DlENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 F. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 M E M O R A N D U M C C C ~ ~ a Ci To; Mayor and Member of the City Council o FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager DATES February 14, 1992 SUBJECTt Parks and Recreation Department Options for Development The Parks and Recreation Department is in the process of developing a study which will outline alternatives for the expenditure of $2.7 million in 1986 Bond money. These general park bonds were originally intended for the construction of two new recreation centers within the city, From the time these bonds were approved concerns have been raised regarding the use of this money. In the current economic climate, it does not seem prudent to consider opening two new facilities and absorbing the associated operation and maintenance cost and additional staffing, Therefore, the Parks nripartment staff has begun to consider various options for the $2,7 million expenditure which will be presented to the Park and Recreation Advisory Board on February 24, 1992. These options includes 1. Build two new centers as approved, The $2.7 million will allow for the purchase of two 20-acre tracts of land for approximately $700,000. That will leave approximately $1.0 million for each center which would build a center of approximately 10,000 square feet or one half the size of the Martin Luther Hinq, Jr. Recreation Center. A center of that size would be 2,000 square feet smaller than North Lakes and Denia Centers, It should be further noted that North Lakes and Denia are already inadequate because of their original reduction in size, This site facility would only allow for a gymnasium, office, lobby, and restrocros. 811/5668200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 i :ti Y tY Z .i Aont'a Plo. _ 1Pz'O~Jr February 14, 1992 Agowlaltom. Gvs_l~1 e_ Page - 2 f 2. Renovation and expansion of the North Lakes Recreation Center and Land Acquisition in South Denton The firm of Hatfield Crookless Architects is currently working on various alternatives for the renovation/expansion of the North Lakes Recreation Center, Norm Hatfield will be making a presentation at the February 24 Park Hoard meeting regarding amenities that may be realized through this project, in this two-part proposal, the majority of the funds would go toward the North Lakes Recreation Center. The remainder of the money would be used to acquire a large tract of land for a community park in the southern sector of the city, one site has been ,er identified and is available if this alternative is pursued. The attached report details the site's potential as a community park. 3. Do not sell the Bonds, Although this would not permit any additional or enhanced park services as approved by voters in the 1986 bond program, it wuu1d allow the Parks Department to continue the delivery of services at its current level and without negatively impacting the existing operating budget. Due to the unique opportunity available with the possible purchase of land at a very attractive price, staff is prepared to brief you on the attached Site Analysis and Assessment Report at the Executive Session on February 18, 2992, This acquisition is a portion of option 2 as outlined above. CLlo d Harrell. LHslr AJJ00224 OY, Agenda No. ~~k•,O~D~2S~ Apia Itom. Date SITE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF 200.35 ACRE PROPERTY ON TEASLEY LANE JANUARY 1992 CITY OF DENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT C w Agenda No. Agonda UomM~_ _ Date -Ig1f' ; 'T'ABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction a 2 iT. Location and Adjacent Land Use . , , , 2 III. Site Assessment, , , , , , IV. Master Plan Considerations . , , , , , V. Evaluation and Recommendation i a 4 9a Agandaltom I . INTRODUCTION 4 le~~o !lL~ The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (F.D.I.C.) is Ud 1 currently offering a 200.39 acre site for sale on Teasley Lane f between Londonderry and Hobson. Originally offered at $3.1 million, the property's current market value is approximately $450,000 to $525,000 due to location, development costs, and current housing market; conditions ir, Denton. The market value ~ is a Broker's opinion of current Value for the property as provided by a RMG commercial real estate broker. The 1990 tax records indicate an appraised value of $726,482. As determined by the broker, the highest and best use of the subject property is Speculative Land Invustmerit or Park. The purpose of this report is to analyze the potential of this 200.39 acre site to be used as a public park. II. LOCATION AND ADJACENT LAND USE This is a 200.39 acre site located in south Denton on Teasley Lane, FM 2181, between Londonderry and Hobson Lane. The property is approximately 1,500 feet from Interstate 35-E and is, therefore, highly accessible to the public. The site is located in Council District 4 and Census Tract 213.02 which has a total population of 7,426, the highest census tract population in the City. There is approximately 3,800 feet of frontage on Teasley Lane which serves as the property's east boundary. Teasley Lane, FM 2181 is currcnt].y a two-lane asphalt road with improvements scheduled by the state Department of Transportation to begin in the Fall of 1492 which will upgrade , i, >I the road to four lanes divided with le€t turn lanes at Savanah, Longridge, and Sand Piper. The ' Southridge subdivision, an established residential development, is also east of the property (Zoned SF-lo). The City currently leases a small open area from the Denton Independent School District (DISD) at Teasley and Longridge. The DISD property is undeveloped and is managed and maintained by the Parks and Recreation Department under the cooperative agreement with DISD to insure future park needs for this area. The southern boundary of the property includes Trinity c United Methodist Church (Zoned A) located on Hobson, just west of Teasley, The subject property has 2,371 feet of frontage on Hobson which is a two-lane divided asphalt road. The Forrestridge subdivision, another established residential development, (Zoned SF-16) lies to the south. Acme Brick Corporation operates a brick manufacturing plant on property adjacent to the site on the west (Zoned Special Use, S-3, S-4, S-20). Another contiguous site to the west which fronts onto Hobson is zoned agricultural (See Attachment 7). Multi-family and small strip commercial development (Zoned MF-1) adjoin the property to the north. There is one access point to the property off Londonderry at Jason Drive. The subject property is zoned PD-.103 which was filed in 1985 and proposes single family and cluster housing residential uses. See Map for current zoning bounriaries, The land uses surrounding the site provide for a stable neighborhood with potential for expanoi~.4 residential development, 0D5' Monde PIO. A~AnI'011em__WE-J 0l1 3 yid ._.~1~•..9_~._._;~ 3~ Venda No, Agenda Item_.. Ible ITI, SITE ASSESSMENT The site is "L" shaped and slopes from west/ to the southeast with the high point of the property occurring in the , far west corner of the property. The site is fenced and is currently being leased for cattle grazing, The site slopes approximately 63 feet to the lowest point on the property in Fletchers' Branch of Hickory creek which runs to the aouth through the property. The southern section of the property offers the most significant topographic variation with grades between 5% - 6$. The far northwest corner of the property also has slopes up to 5$, then levels out into the floodplain with grades less than 14. This section of land would typically lend itself to athletic field development since this use would not affect or obstruct runoff. This area of the site also receives runoff from the Aame Brick property to the west primarily consisting of sediment from clay pits. An Environmental Assessment would need to be undertaken at a base cost of $2,500. This would include research of regulatory literature to determine if the site was used for an underground storage or disposal site, study of rerial photos, a site assessment, location of t•ility lines; research of tiny existing environmental reports ou the properly, identification of soil pas )asod on USDA Soil Surveys, profile of geology, and identification of adjacent land uses and their impact on the site. This is referred to as a Phase I Assessment. If i any problems or concerns were identified in Phase I, a Phase 4 V II Assessment might be needed. This includes soil sampling at various depths, depending on the suspected problem. cost estimates for soil testing begin at $500-$600 per soil boring and increase to $1,500 per 130il boring tf heavy equipment is regnired. Soil testing is advised to determine not only the suitability of the soil for various types of development, but , also to test for any possible contaminants due to runoff. No more than five soil samples should be required at this site. It is not anticipated that theN,e bores will require the use of heavy equipment and should cost $500-$600 per sample. Aside from the Fletcherst Branch, there is a small retention pond on the southeast edge of the property. Approximately 71 acres fall within the 100 Year Floodplain with over half of that acreage in the Floodway, The Floodplain is linear, about 500 feet, wide runnilnq the length of the property from north to south along Teasley Lane. Th s location of the floodplain and £loodway will restrict access onto the property from Teasley. The most feasible entrance off Teasley would be opposite of Savana.h where a roadway could curve around the £loodway without having to construct a bridge as would be necessary at any point south of 5avanah. Adequate access is available on Hobson as wall its one point, of access off Londonderry at Jason Drive. Typically, no development is allowed in the floodway and restricted development in the 100 Year Floodplain. Another factor affecting development of ton site as d park is plant cover, particularly established tree communities. Mesquite trees occur throughout the floodplain C and lower sections of the property in substantial quantities Agwida No. 5 Apmda Ilom_ I " a that could be thsnned out in certain areas to allow for desirable land patterns and provider for athletic field development where needed, Hardwood trees also exist along the banks of Fletchers' Branch and on higher sections of the site off Hobson and near the Acme Brick property. Some reforestation would be required to supplement the current tree ' population as well as delineate lanti use within the site. Most reforestation could occur in phases along with any i development, It is recommended that 50 trees be planted each year for the next five years at a cost of $120 per tree ($6,000 per year) to establish a healthy, diversified tree population, provide beneficial buffers between adjacent land uses, and aid in beautification efforts. Although no infrastructure exists, this is not a critical factor for initial development of passive park uses. A 1411 water line runs the entire length of Teasley on the west side. There is a 1611 water line on Hobson as well as sewer lines. Electricity is also readily available, IV. MASTER PLAN CONSIDERATIONS The Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified a shortage of both neighborhood and community park land in this area of the community. It recommends a community park be acquired and developed for this area and that a recreation center and community pool be located in that park. [n addition, a community park of this size would allow for the development of much needed picnic facilities, playground C areas, walking and jogging trails, and tennis courts. The c size of the park would also allow for a future athletic() r hgarrda No.....~ 6 Apontla Ilom_ 11.1i 0.0 complex which would prevent overuse at other park locations, N particularly smaller neighborhood parks. Additional park facilities in this area include Jae Skiles Park, a six acre neighborhood park, located at Stonegate and Stemmons Freeway and currently serves this community, providing ball fields, a basketball court, two tennis courts, playground, and picnic facilities. Denia Park and Recreation Center is also located , in the southwest sector of the city, serving primarily its adjacent neighborhood. V. EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that this site be considered for acquisition by the City of Denton for use as a public park. The property's location in South Denton where a deficit of park land exists, its proximity to major thoroughfares, its size which allows flexibility in development and broadens the scope of potential uses, its drastically reduced price, and the overall physical suitability of the site for a community park make this site a unique and attractive opportunity for the city. Initially, the property would remain in its natural state until -funds can be scoured for some typ, ~.f park development, if and when development does happen, initial I%,rpss to the to will be off Hobson or Londonderry. Access tc Teasldy could happon, but it would be expensive if bridging across the floodway were required. The site is adequate to handle any type of park or r.,.;.aatioi,aA developme.. ..lynt happen in the future. The attached land use plan identifies these basic patterns for development. 7 blends Ilerr_.._GS~S_`l.71..... Y. r r l 4 1 1M Initial budget Impact could be minimized it the current lease were retained, allowing the property to exist in its current natural state. once the property is developed, that maintenance cost could increase to $2,000 per developed acre. once any major development occurs, additional maintenance ' personnel would be needed the following budget year to prevent any negative impact on the overall park system. The funds to cover a possible purchase could potentially come out of the 0,2.7 million remaining in 1986 Bond Funds. There would need to be some discussions with the Park Board, several public meetings to receive input about allowing this expenditure, and some subsequent approval by the Council. Aoanda No, Agorlda A 1w C d Il i Noma NO, Agenda Itamw_~c(1~ t Date T r Attached are the following documentsi ♦ Location Map (Attachment 1) M • Property Base Map (Attachment 2) • Zoning Plan for PD103 (Attachment 3) • 1.00 Year Floodplain Map (Attachment 4) rv + Excerpt from Comprehensive Master Plan (Attachment 5) s Excerpt from RMO Brokerage Analysis (Attachment 5) • zoning Map (Attachment 7) A 9 yi I` 1 I ~ I L INTERSTATE 33 monda No. %~'00S_ _ FM, 11010 to ! ~ r J Irk 1~.. 01" LIMITS ri 1.~ . r 38 i r r 1 r- ~1 1.. i~ I I I ~4~ NTON ~ I wow AIRPORT IV? L MURSTATIE 35 • a -L S' r ...1 / r M I ATTACHMENT 1 if ti✓ F F%t I Awda No. p Agouda Isom-.. ~ rfi~tll. ~ ~jy'~ 0 I , JI AG1G `Z~ ~ C,'~ Ar I„ dill ' ~`~LIYNF NI. 44. In'~li µ14A ANII FUU.w J I•, qp' /Y KI µ1 ~lln q ,n itl~.l u'u ~ F I V' 3N ~ ~ A ~,IfAI ~ n } I 1 't = I i 1 A ' A31~ I I A 1,111 lit ~~1~r791 I I 1 ' M ATTACHMENT f9 f _ - - gerl a em lV - .J Ibey ' e Dale I S i i 1, ~ Yr YrY •w. II •.Y.1 r.. r.,.. 'go i ~ 1. ...Y I 1. 5~ .X ♦YI Yul Y MII Y1Y VH wooo ,MII 101Y. ^w •YM •X dm -V ~I 1 M11 rY 1 Y o.1M. ~...1 f~1 / w ..Y w r w I ' Y Ill. .y/1 IiIM I . ~ V _oo rM1 ; 1Yrnw r 'ZOAZNG PLAN, DENTON. TEXAS t~ ~sCs1ff lip MAY 0 8 1995 ATTACHMENT 3. ti t Agenda No. Agenda Rom_.~,~Z~.. We 4 ,17vi 7 7 1 ..q Hrs o f ' Y q 07<q 2 ~Yr,I is a ao.IO, n eFEi a LONDON +~i 5 ~ _OFARY • y0 S1REEi N ZONE X ZONE X :d DETAILED STUDY 4 ZONE X , 636 m ! ZONE AE ZONE X I , 629 3 Re ZONE X ,'7 , FlNChei Rrcnch ZONE X b n~ 615 Soho Ai00E e e DRIVE 1 ti, 614 s ZONE x Dun 61J I $AMOHASp " C o F ZONE X $ F' _ mar= ps C AM 39 c ZONE X ZONE X F' ZONE X ZONE A BJ1 ATTACHMENT u l,1 ZONE ZONE X , X 'r+MONrecliooRIVE tisnwr s-'~'i1 C.1 1 Agenda N4. -OL? - Afyanda ftom- Wto €0 DENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN a ATTACHMENT r, _ ~i is Agenda No. Agenda ilom!~~_/~_ _ t 2a 7- L t• W 6r - t' ' \ 15 J~1, r• H 1} 1 \ I 4k, L. Numbers note Parks R Recreation Department Planning Zones s FACILITY/OPEN SPACE PRO,JEC_T_IONS _ -FOR MASTER PLAN Neighborhood Community Regional - Est.--POP ; _Park Acres Park Acres Park Areas Total ,acres Existing 47 ~ 52,000 156 150 310 507 55,000 165 27~ 260 676 58,000 715 174 290 61,000 275 61,000 183 305 290 754 192 305 3 67,000 201 320 320 7932 70,000 201 335 .335 871 210 350 871 350 910 Standards: Neighborhood Park 3 acres/1000 pop, Community Park 5 acres/1000 pop, Regional Park 5 acres/1000 pop, Type: Neighborhood (Type 1) size 1-5 acres Agenda No.~ ~ 'Oa,S 4 Neighborhood (Type II) size I0-15 acres A9endal}ono- Community Park size 30+ acres Regional Park size 200+ acres Dale. M~ Facilities: 17 t~31 e Nei-ghbor~ hid (TYPe I 6 iI) Comity -R *Playfields *Athletic fields "Flay areas Natural areas *Picnic areas *Play area *Outdoor recreation *Shelter(s) Picnic areas "Special intertast *Shelters "Hard surface area *Ha14ard surface d rarea *Recreation facilities Exist_in Itanclard Difference Zone 1 - Population 4488: Neighborhood Park Acreage 5 Community 40 13 -8 22 +18 Zone 2 - Population 10766: Neighborhood Park Acreage to Community 0 32 - 22 54 -54 54 Zone 3 - Population 15532: Neighborhood Park Acreage 0 Community 20 45 -45 75 -S5 Zone 4 - Population 10859: Neighborhood Park Acreage 15 Community 20 33 -18 55 -35 Zone S - Population 4220: Neighborhood Park Acreage 0 Community 25 13 .13 21 +4 Zone 6 - Population 6207: Neighborhood Park Acreage 16 Community 0 17 31 19 1 i3 1 31 - tc Y. At present, there is a clear deficiency of accessible park land in our neighborhood areas. We are approximately 110 acres below standard for this type of open space. Existing neighborhood parks are, at present, adequately serving only 30% o£ Denton's population, To increase that percentage we are proposing the following; 1) Work with the DISD to identify and lease certain tracts of school property to create school/park sites. The City would then maintain and develop these sites with approval of the DISD. In this way, many new park sites ran be secured without any purchase of land. The schools would benefit due to reduced maintenance costs and additional outdoor equipment and facilities for their student;;. We would suggest that all school sites be considered except the High School, Strickland, Woodrow Wilson, and Borman. This would bring into the park system six new school/park sites and would increase our park services to approximately 50% of the population of Denton. 2) Try to lease land from individuals, businesses, churches, agencies, schools, etc:., in or around the priority areas indicated on the park development map. These priority areas are areas that have a high residential density but do not have parks in their immediate areas. If parks could be secured in these areas, we would then be providing adequate park services to approximately 90% of Denton's population. 3) If land cannot be secured on a leased basis as per recommendations one and two, we would propose the City institute a land acquisition program targeting neighborhood park sites. Community Park; We also. have a deficiency of approximately 100 acres in the amount of community park land that should b•e available. To keep up with recommended development; we are proposing adding on to existing community parks and acquiring new sites in two areas of town. The following recommendations will hopefully bring us up to :standard; 1) Acquire land adjacent to Evers Park, Mack Park and Denia Park for future development. 2) Acquire two new community paark sites in planning areas two and six. These sites should be in excess of 30 acres each and located as centrally in each area as possible. We must also take into account areas of natural uniqueness. Linear Parks Linear parks are a way to provide buffer, beautification and a passive alternative to the more active park areas. These parks are possible on drainage way, utility easements, parkway3 and ~Joqda 14 Aaonda liom. 1 ,f1_.I J,...... DAU 1 ZONE/RECODIN NDAT IONS To facilitate planning activities, the Parks and Recreation Department has divided Denton into planning zones marked by major thoroughfares. The zones fall into logical and relatively homogeneous arenas, but because of differences in housing density, it is not possible to have zones of similar population. These planning areas are easily recognizable neighborhoods and communities within the City. In attempting to analyze the recreation needs of the City, it is helpful to divide it into smaller units. The biggest reason a for this more localized consideration is to allow for- demographic differences from neighborhood to neighborhood. Also, people tend to dislike crossing barriers such as I-3S when they seek parks and recreation services. PIannin&_ r a a 1 * Light athletic complex at Evers * Re-develop Evers Park Redevelop North Lakes Park * Expand development at Bowling Green Park Acquire and develop 10 acres for neighborhood parks * Develop soccer complex at North Lakes * Expand tennis center * Construct district pool Planning Area 2 Build school/center * Re-develop Note Shultz Develop school/park site at Ginnings Acquire and develop 25 acres for neighborhood parks * Develop one community park * Develop Windsor Drive park site Planning, Area 3_ a Re-develop McKenna Park Develop school/park sites at Razor and Congress * Acquire and develop 25 acres for neighborhood parks Plannin Area 4 " Redevelop Civic Center Park, Fred Moore Park, Phoenix Park, Mack Park and Milani Park * Develop Woodrow Lane site * Acquire and develop 25 acres for neighborhood parks Developp school/park sites at Davis and Lee Build bandshell in Civic Center Park * Construct community center in Mack Park area Construct two lighted softball fields at Mack Park N Vida Nu "d0 t - 29 - ayonda inm,_ a31i f~ • .22 0~ ,~1 h sw./ X r. s; a I Planniniz Area 5 * Redevelop Denia Park * Acquire and develop 10 acres for neighborhood parks t * Re-lamp fields at Denia for girls softball Planar Area 6 * Re-develop Skiles Park and Brierclif£ Park * Acquire and develop 5 acres for neighborhood parks * Develop school/park site at Houston * Construct school/center * Construct district pool Apanda No. .agenda Itolr SUS ' r ~ 31 y~ A 30 . C 4 ri :.f'1 S}if~l i' U ~M INVESTMENT PROPERTY OFFERING AnondaItem /6CL flue Rm' COMMERCIAL A R MANAGEMENT GROUP BROKERAGE, LEASING AND INVESTMENTS LICENSED REAL ESTATE BROKER ATTACHMENT 6 t~` 1 ..,."ON I 4' I r, SUBMtARKE-r ,Jew residential construction averages approximately 125 units exists over a 10 year supply of residential Lots at this continued rate re anti supply, Cur Current Planned !ot development (Prelimina per year, Presently, there of on, An over sized lot development abuts hel stage) e eds an 2 y year they afford an attractive alternative to the small property lot from the the o additional 2 ear Lewisville, absorption has been slow, r p m south. And although Lack of adequate infrastru cture (le. sewer) will continue to hinder future development developments found Given the slow growth of properties which are not currently Fnsco and g any of the Denton improvements be issued for Malin y~ their exists little o t' Y serviced, declines. regional mall P ►mism that bonds will the proxlrrtity to the to economy developments until existing lot inventory enhance the propertyls lucatio and ease of access to Interstate e35 n do development costs) would a r4 however other more suitable Other limiting conditions effec i gt~he d and of superior (sue and lower 111 to the industrial manufacturing plant, Opportunities for development, this property is its proximity RECENT S AYES ACnvr1Y Per attached, IT C I f li ~I I ~ r SITE, DESCRIPTION The subject site consists of approximately 200.3908 acres of unimproved land located within the Denton City limits, Denton County (refer to location map), The tract is irregular in shape and includes approximately 3,800 feet of frontage along FM2181, known as Teasley Lane (Ease Boundary), Approximately 2,370 feet of frontage is situated along Hobson Lane which is the southern boundary to the property, Both Farm to Market roads are two lane asphalt roads which intersect just east of the subject property, The site slopes downward from west to east with the highest point along the southwest corner (elev.672) Approximately 71 acres (depicted by heavy white border-2) Iles within the 100 year flood plain, A large portion of 71 acres is defined as floodway area (depicted by thin white border-1), The western portion of the site is bordered by Acme Brick Corporation who manufacture residential bricks for home construction. The northern property line Is abutted by government subsidized housing and several small offices. The southeast corner of the property adjoins a small church, SITE ZONING Presently the property zoning is designated as planned development-103 (PD-103). This permits residential development which allows for one to ten units per acre. Additionally, the site is subject to a comprehensive site plan (shown in section 1) and made part of the PD. Commercial and industrial uses are not presently permitted or provided for in constitute higher l income Residential single f mliy residences t on lots south hats vary from , 251 tpro 2 ac e tracts. UTILITIES Water is available through a 14 inch service line which travels along Teasley Lane. A indicate that this service is not 12 in sewer line currently services adjoining residential communities, City officials Electric is available and gas service is sufficient to he adjacent development this plant OCCUPANCY LEVELS , The property is currently leased on a month to month basis for cattle grazing. Occupancy levels as such are not applicable. TAX INFORMATION 1990 Tax Wormation indicates an appraised value of $726,482, 1990 assessment was at a rate of $2.14/per 100, with total tax liability of approximately $15,603.37. Consideration should be given to rezoning the property or receiving an agricultural exemption as a means of reducing tax liability. konda No. Ago+lda Itohm__ ' r IT' ti ti, i 'TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENT ATTRIBUTES/CONSTRAINTS Given the lack of information to the contrary, reclamation of existing 1~loodway acreage is not permitted as a general rule. Reclamation of 100 Year Flood Plain acreage is permitted under supervised conditions by the Corps of Engineers. The current topography and soil conditions suggest inferior development conditions. Water runoff, erosion potential and slow to moderate permeability of soil considerations dictate that a thorough site and water runoff plan is needed to estimate costs for development. Typical studies as a rule will cost $20,000. to $25,000. and would be necessary in order to make an accurate estimate. A water retention pond would be expected for handling water runoff. This will require additional site work and possible dredging in addition to normal site development work and will minimize usable acreage. Utility capacity including gas, sewer (storm and sanitary) and electrical are undersized for any present development of this property (water, appears to be of adequate sizing). While some of these costs may be absorbed by the city or utility company(s), we would anticipate most of the direct costs to be incurred by the developer.Environmental considerations due to the proximity to Acme Brick Company will require a through investigation (minimal-level II with multiple soil borings). Estimated costs $15,000. to $20,000. Pre-purchase investigative costs are estimated to be $40,000, to $50,000. before a developer could accurately estimate development opportunities or begin to line up financing arrangements. ECONOMIC AND DEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY Under the present PD (excluding cluster, tennis club and park) approximately 106 acres are available and intended for lot development. This assumes a 25% infrastructure acreage allocation, net available acreage of 150 acres and takes into account lot sizing. Total planned development exceeds 514 homes or approximately 4 years supply of home lots for the entire Denton area. Given the following: (1) the current residential lot inventory (10 year supply); (2) current planned lot development-preliminary plat stage (2 year supply); (3) annual absorption (125 lots/yr.); (4) a phased development plan (note. this ultimately results in a higher overall infrastructure cost); (5) lack of available financing; (6) numerous location constraints (Proximity to manufacturing and government subsidized housing) and (7) excessive site preparation and associated costs, the near term (5 years or less), probability of an ecbnomicalfy feasible project is unlikely. The only current realistic development opportunity would be in a multi-family project(s). Acreage requirements however, are minimal, assuming 25 units to the acre, where overall atM^age requirements would absorb no more than 25 acres (525 total units). Current , ,uai apartment occupancy is less than 90%, with average rates in the mid to high .50 pcr foot range. Conditions do not favor immediate near term development (2 years or less), Additionally, (according to city planers) adjoining homeowners presently object to additional Multi-family development or high density residential usage. City planners appear to carry the same opinion. Retail and industrial activity is not seen as a viable alternative now or In the future and would require zoning change. lhnndaNo. fl(J1311dd ~ICfll._,L(!~_.~A.D!1___.__..- ~ ~ i5 1 Y. l Further financial analysis normally presented with a Opinion of Value are not applicable" due to unknown site development costs. Estimations for development can be provided, however the validity and reliability of the presentation would reflect a highly subjective opinion. DEVELOPMENT HOLDING COST PROJECTION FOR ACREAGE Anticipate hold period • 10 years 4 Purchase price, acquisition costs- $ 15,000. purchase price- S 450,000, Total S 465,000. Anticipated holding costs: taxes and insurance- $ 1001000. opportunity costs Q 8%- S 540.000. Total Equity osition $1,105,000. Assumes no f~nancing costs Acreage basis cost 150 acres w $ 7,367. (Pre-development year 10) Normal appraisal techniques wW typically consider comparable sales, income proforma (estimated or stabilized) and cost approaches in determining current value. When similar and applicable sales transaction, are unavailable and income/market approaches are in appropriate, the valuation than becomes subjective. The subject property falls into this category mid will most likely be purchased under long term Investment parameters and consideration. Highest and Best Use Is Speculative Land Investment or Park. Competing Properties: Refer to attached list. SUMMARY AND OPINION OF VALUE The following Broker's Opinion of Current Value for the subject property is subject to the limiting conditions noted and financial assumptions expressed. Current present market value - $ 450,000.00 (1) (1) Speculative/Investor Land Value Agenda No. Agenda itant_ ,S Dula hl. rT 3r y r The basis for this determination is due to existing residential zoning; topography and net usable acreage, estimated at 150 acres; site development costs; location and alternative properties (existing developed inventory); and the ability to acquire financiag for near term development. THIS IS AN OPINION OF VALUE OR COMPARATIVE MARKET ANALYSIS AND SHOULD NOT SE CONSIDERED AN APPRAISAL. IN MAKINO ANY DECISION THAT RELIES UPON NY WORK, YOU SHOULD KNOW THAT I HAVE NOT FOLLOWED OVER THE GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF AN APPRAISAL OR ANALYSIS CONTAINED IN THE UNIFORM STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL APPRAISAL PRACTICE OF THE APPRAISAL FOUNDATION. 4 Agunda No. _2DOS Aljanda Aam__ 1,140L A L Ys f INMKIVIA11ON With brokei., are oblii a" by law I eitiit'y tiw l 'Ave tprovided FOR A PROSPEC WE to 'gear you honestly and falrly• REAL ESTATE BUYER TAY ~ L. the Pr •p ctive Buyer or Tenant with OR TENANT copy of this lidorniution. • Present all written offers to the owna:r Pro"OlY, 2( 4 When working with a real estate broker in . Disclose material facts about the property buying or leasing r^al estate, Texas law requires that you be informed of whom'the known to die broker. Broker or Soles AssaL►te NOW is MPUCW4 in the flarisacxiori' • Offer tlk; Property widxwt regard to race, As 1% prospeetive buyer or teiwnt, creed, sex, religion or nWoAW origin. _ t l t, you s6atkl know that: U you choose to have a real estate Date - ~ Both the Now who luxe property for sale b repueW You as Your agenjo Of Jesse (die hsdq broke) sad die broker you Should eater into a written t have received who dais wkh a buyer or tenant (die ,Co- l~ti'aC>< t11at: ,read and understand t!d bmkex" or "setting" broker) are usually L►forrnatbn. PAW by die owner and rue the owner's . Clearly establishes the obGgalioris of bobs parties; And • Their ditties, byakies and aid►fubiess are . Sets out taw your ngcnt will be paid and Prospective Buyer/Tewml owed to die dotter, and they must inform or Its representative diaowiwotall imporlantkifamsation they by whom. know w" IWSW offed do ,S docislon mwWq the salt or ukase of U You have any queAkm rqa'din~ die prop q. thte roles and respormib ilft of real W estate btrokers, please ask. Prospective lYuyer/'reruint • While aeitlier troker is your agent, die ~ bo g P or its represealative okers Con. kb with information ~ , m about available lxope you and sourc48 of fuiaacirtg and aid you in analyzing and s ooraparing did physica3 and monomk • b This ronn hw been pru migme.l by the Texas fPJlfiire~ Ot'dlffer+ent properties, as W.r as ShOW Rent l:sl+te Cu+iwrissiun fur rcyuireJ use by 4 by ing You do properties and am&i asg i• 1 ; Q exu real Cm liansces, quir you in utakir,g an offer to purchase or esWIC uJKLC 4` * Agency Uix:losurc Forl41, w t Y ti r I Aoenda Nc.._.~ r C I I A0011da Ifonl__ ClJS ~ ~ rl: • , is Date t a II ~ __arrr w~w.r YYYr rl ^ 1 A fy" ! \ i \ pole 1 J t w 'Ile rr_r , 17. MF1 LJ III vhAff ~..r` Y _ ; I PO-103 .J J i, ♦N iNEY 2' rr; rrrr~r YrrrY If ~OJR 11 t} .fit PD 9 ( 1 ~LlhN+JflST _i^-A,1e'_.i '.w,~Nr. .l•~r ~ ,rryl K1".ARK ^R OE 1 I (J? ~ PD-103 L ~ 7a~1EFJ$E _-"wwai. SF-10 Ni,it I II N 1 RSOP1 t~ j .r.r~~~ as*s 4tai.c3 - l wI I 1; tot IS F i 61 - 166NVieICiJ.~ WI ~ t 1IV i S +~`r" n- tl (r _ Tw9ER... ortEEld ..tl ~ i 7l ~ I I` /r. CIRCLE I ` rr'17 _ y0'I~ A I E1~ ~f iF-15 SxA 9fNV.'OAX. .'r. a 1 \ ATTACHMENT 71, -.I~ c i VF_,.~ f IR_lL , WllS CJ+ ti i~ t -I r" - d - ~ CITY - r COUNCIL 4 F .1 L L FFF v~~~QQUO~Q pOpp H O O o O V Z ~ ~O QF ~ O ~~~pOppOC .v , t Oc,~oO~vo CCOuGO t.. x~ Y '0% 'i i Acenda No. Agenda ltcrn. _..k~s Rate CITY of Drf:NTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MSMOR"DUM w DATE: February 9.3, 1992 T0: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager 1.. FROM: Kathy Dubose, Director of Accounting & Budget Operations,) SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 18, 1992 4IORKSESSION Please find attached a proposed agenda and illustrations for our briefing with the city Council regarding the City's GIP and related budgeting procer3s. In addition, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on February 12th to receive input from the public for the 1992-97 CIF. The following organizations were represented in person, or in writing, and their comments and recommendations are included in the attached material for council's review. university of North Texas Denton Library Board Denton Good Samaritan Village Denton State School Denton Airport Advisory Board Denton Home and Apartment Builders Association Denton Ceounty Amphitheater Association Township II/Hobson Hill Homeowners Association , scriptux'e Area Residents if. I can provido additional information that may be helpful, please advise. KD:af Attachments AFF0018D 8171566.8200 D/FW MFTRO 434.2529 y 1 A4onde Ron, -x-005 Agonda Own.M,_(~~ I~R AGENDA 1992-93 • THE CIP AND T'RE BUDGETING PROCESS • THE CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET IN PROCESS IN BRIEF • BETTER IDENTIFICATION AND BETTER TIE OF UPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS RELATED TO EACH CAPITAL PROJECT - ANNUAL INFORMATION RATES BY EXPENDITURE CATEGORY (New General Project Detail Worksheets) • PLAN SCOPE - STEMS HAVING A USEFUL LIFE OF MORE THAN TEN (10) YEARS • BUDGET SCOPE - ALL CAPITAL ITEMS • STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO P&Z COMMISSION BASED UPON PROJECT EVALUATION AND IMPACT ONr 1, Public Safety, Health and Li.fel 2. Legal Requirements, Liability or Mandate 3. Quality and Reliability of Current Service Level) 4. Economic Growth and Developments and, 5, Recreational, Cultural and Aesthetic Value, AFF0018E t_ 1 h f. AGOnda No.. Agendaijom-_ _flsS ~ T' BUGET PRC~~'' 4 THE CIP CAPITAL PLAN THE MAJOR BUDGET ISSUES REPORT V THE PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET THE ADOPTED OPERATING BUDGET v THE ADOPTED CAPITAL BUDGET r. ~ti e1 Agenda No. Capital Improvements Budget Calen a Itam_~jAL,~ 2992-97 January 22 City Staff Capital Improvement Budget Kick-Off February 12 Public Utilities Board and Planning and Zoning Commission hold a Public Hearing to receive input from community regarding capital Improvement Program. February 18 City Council briefing on Capital Improvement Program budgeting process. ' March 3 Public Utilities Hoard holds a work session to review Utilities Capital Improvement Plan. General Government Capital Improvement Program air staff requests due to Budget Office for review and analysis, March 24 Public Utilities Board receives preliminary working draft of Utilities Capital Improvement Plan for work session. April 3 Public Utilities Board worksession on Utilities Capital Improvement Plan. April 9 General GovF+rnment Capital Improvement requests are presented to Executive Staff for consideration. April 13 Executive Staff reviews General Government requests and formulate recommendation to be forwarded to Planning and Zoning commission. April 15 Final draft Utilities CIP due to Budget Office April 22 Public Utilities Board's final recommendation of A Utilities Capital Improvement Plan. May 13 Presentation to and discussion of Capital Improvement Plan by Planning and Zoning commission. May 27 Planning and Zoning commission holds a public hearing in a special meeting and considers a recommendation. June 16 CIP presented to Council in Worksession. AFF00123 Rev. 01/22/92 1 J, ~c F% kande No, Aganda Item___',-ee ~~.y W(I CITIZEN REQUESTS FOR CIP 1992-96 Listed below are those citizens addressing the Public Utilities o Board and the Planning and zoning Commission and their respective requests during the Join Public Hearing held February 12, 1992, regarding the 1992-1996 Capital Improvements Plan. Fred Connell' Represented the Denton Good Samaritan Village (20 representatives attending), requests a drainage ditch. Kent Wolf from Denton State School and Jane Hopkins Rcquest road repairs on State School Road, Hickory Creek and Robinson Road. Kent Wolf also requested storm drainage. Mary Ward Representing Gazebo Apartments, Carroll Courts and the Trees Apartments, requests sidewalk on Highland Street from Carroll to Welch. Rick Woo.lfolk Representing Denton Airport Advisory Board (see attached schedule) Fred Gossett Representing Denton Home and Apartment Builders, requests sidewalk restoration throughout the City. ' Roger Strahan Requost sewer lir,;1 on Sunnydale from Stewart to Windsor. Dane Duncan-Mayer and Jack Miller Representing Denton County Amphitheater Association, requests funding in 1996-97 budget. Slick Smith Requests road repair of shoulder drop off on Mingo Road from entrance to City Service Center to Mockingbird. Also requests railing and reflectors on bridge over ravine on Mockingbird. Underground drainage on Redwood and Cherokee, c'V rw,:aca•~ J,! . of Agenda No. Citizen Requests Agendallem- .1992-96 CIP Page Dale ~ / 9 Brenda Romero Requests cement culvert Evers Parkway @ Evers Parkway Laura Wilson Requests storm drainage on Laguna Drive from Sherman to Stuart Road. s Don Leander Representing Township II/Hobson Hill Homeowners Association requests a neighborhood park. ;aa AFF0018F C± I 1 j. f rip Ajanda No. University of North l'Xas Agenda flare iJ / . Office of the Vice President wte ~ For Administrative Affairs 7tY February 5, 1992 A Ms. Corrina Gil Management Services Administrator Office of Budget & Management Services City of Denton Municipal Building 215 Cast McKinney street Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Ms. Gilt Thank you for the opportunity to again submit our recommendations for Denton's Capital Improvement Program (Clp), We appreciate the street improvements that you have made the past few years in the vicinity of the campus, However, there are still several streets that are seriously in need of repair and we solicit your support in continuing this work. I n addition to being Denton's largest employer we have over 27,000 students who make studentsevselralivetberips the significant campus, The majority result of our a very projects traffic described in the attached eproposals ewill idirectly tbenefituthe community and each person associated with the University, Your favorable consideration for completion of these projects will be appreciated, ncerely, F ederick R,. Pol/ vIe -t_ Vice President for Administrative Affairs Attachments r 4 C F'.0. Box 13737 i)cotonr "re.xas 76203.3737 (817) 5652103 o Metro: 1817) 267.0652 w t r Agenda No. -'005._... 0,t RO 05A Agonda ltom._ _ - I , Date ..rZ~_';~ Repave Maple Street from Avenue B to Avenue C Project Description: and from Welch to Bernard Need: The existing pavement is deteriorated, failure to repave this section in a timely manner will result in even more damage to the surface and increasing damage to the subgrade. This street serves as the primary access to a major portion of our, dormitory residents. + Benefits: This project will directly benefit the 30,000 plus students, faculty and staff of the University, Indirectly the entire community will benefit due to improved traffic flow, reduction of traffic on Eagle Drive, and a much better impression on visitors to the community and campus. A Yi Agenda ND. CIP PROPOSAL Agonda Iton, IJala o~ Project Description: Repave West Prairie from Avenue E to Bonni 8r a~ Need; The existing pavement is deteriorated, Failure to repave this section in a timely manner will result in even more damage to the surface and increasing damage to the subgrade. This street serves as a primary access to a large part of the Owlsley Addition. BenPri~s: This project will directly benefit the residents of the Owlsley addition as well as the significant amount of traffic that traverses West Prairie Street each day. The condition of the street leaves a bad impression with visitors to our community who attempt to travel on it. A n ~ ~ Q I\ `J Agenda No. ~1~~ : ~r CCP PROPOSAL Agenda flleet a'/S / Dale Project Description: Repave Mulberry Street from Welch to Avenue A and from Avenue 8 to Avenue C Need: The existing pavement is extremely deteriorated. Failure to repave this section in a timely manner will result in even more damage to the surface a+d increasing damage to the subgrade. This street is heavily traveled by both students as well as visitors to the campus. Benefits: This project Niil directly benefit the 30,000 plus students, faculty and staff, It will indirectly benefit the entire community. C,~ !I r Aoonda No. "OQ.SA. UP PROPOSAL Ag13ndallom- Data Project Description; Repave West Highland from Welch to Avenue C Need: The existing pavement is deteriorated. Failure to repave this section in a timely manner will result in even more damage to the surface and increasing damage to the subgrade. This street serves as a major westbound thoroughfare through the campus area. Benefits: This project will directly benefit the 30,000 plus students, faculty and staff. It will indirectly benefit the entire community. ti h Irl ~i ` AOsnda Mo. ~ ~'QQ slam. CIP PROPOSAL Agenda r/ -~~?l Oa ie ._,-L~~~ Project Description: '~,2 Repave Avenue A from Prairie to Need: Chestnut The existing pavement is deteriorated. Failure to i repave this section in a times in even more damage to the surface and will result increasing east9side ofethebUniversitith its location on the by a significant number Ofyvisitorstand guestseto oubyr City and University. It is also heavily used the commuter buses and student traffic, Benefits: This project will directly benefit the 30,000 plus students, faculty and staff. It will indirectly benefit the entire community. C ti i d tl ~d s Denton Library Board 502 Oakland Denton, TX 76201 ° February 12, 1992 r Corinna Gil Management Services Administrator office of Budget & Management Services City of Denton 215 E. McKinney Denton, TX 76201 Dear Ms. Gil: This letter is in response to your, request to be included in discussion of the Capital Improvement Plan for 1992-1997. The Denton Library Board requests 3.2 million Oollars for the purpose of building phases one (15,000 sq. ft.) and two (15,000 sq. ft.) of a branch library at Teasley Lane and Lillian Miller Parkway next to the new fire station under construction. If phase one alone is built, the amount of additional bond money needed is $600,000.00. The Denton Library Board has been considering future library needs in Denton for several years. The Board, specifically, has examined such isst.,es as selecting and hiring an architect, land acquisition, and building. Some months ago the Board unanimously recommended Hidell Architects. in its meeting of January 17, 1991, the Board unanimously recommended acceptance of a land acquisition proposal completed by Mr. Rick Svehla. The City council, at its meeting on February 5, 1991, voted unanimously in favor of accepting that land acquisition. The Denton Library Board at its January 17, 1991 meeting also unanimously approved expenditures to develop its portion of the land at Teasley and Lillian Miller and to commission the architect to create a model of the new library. It is now time to move forward with the building of the branch library, and thus this is a request that funds for that project be included in the CIP for 1992-1997. The location for the new library will provide easy access for the whole community. The land will have a sidewalk and sufficient parking to conform with City standards. For a number of years, existing facilities have been approaching inadequacy. More space is needed to house. collections and to conduct programs for citizens of all ages. . All UARAV W. MY = MR WAS 04 i 1 I'! 1 Ms. Corinna Gil February 12, 1991 Page -2- Library facilities are essential for the education of Denton's citizens. Literacy programs, children's programs, continuing education programs, and the materials to support them are crucial for Denton's citizens. Adequate library facilities are necessary to attract and to retain business and industry. High technology businesses especially need facilities which will contribute to the continuing education and personal development of their employees. The Denton Library Board urges you to give this request high priority in the CIP for 1992-197. All citizens, individual and corporate, will benefit from additional library facilities and services. Thank you for considering -his request. If you have any questions, I am available at 565-2345(W) or 382-4082(H). Sin rely yours, Jean Schaake Chairperson Denton Library Board JS:js AHH001EC cc: Mayor Robert Castleberry Members, Denton city council Mr. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager Mrs. Joella Orr, Library Director Members, Denton Library Board Bills `lq.I5T'S!U z Agenda No, wd Denton Good Samaritan Village Anendalsomd5~~ oHe Is 50~ Ua~e . 2tj February 11, 1992 " Mr. Judd Holt, Chairman Planning & Zoning Commisaion Dear Juddl Trudy Foster and I are encouraging many Good Sam residents to come at 6 p.m. on Wednesday evening to the P & Z meeting to show support for the proposal of the Resident Council concerning our "Ditch", We don't know how you determine the order in which different groups make presentations, but we hope that we may have our turn as early as possible. Most of our senior cit- izens don't like to be out at night. Sincerely, i Fred Connell 38Z 6897 A 2500 Hinkle Drive • Denton, Texas 76201 Phone; 817/383.2651 Fax; 817/382.9306 x r Agenda No. Agenda ~lom_ {J~_ R._ ' AIRPORT DEMB Wtv..c2- 49-fat" FUNDS C.I.P. TOTAL 109 909 ESTIMATED LOCAL FAA COST FUNDS FUNDS PROJECT (1992) 1.---1000' Runway Extension South, 1,248,800 124,880 11123,920 replace drainage under Runway, Extension M.I.R.L. Lighting System and Taxiway, build Holding Apron. {1992) 2. Overlay Runway 17/35 and Repaint 1,068,300 106,830 961,470 (1992) 3. Seal coat Taxiways and Apron, 237,250 23,725 213,525 Paint Taxiway Stripes. (1993) 4. construct North Holding Apron 95,300 9,530 85,770 (1993) 5. Land Acquisition for 1500' 11391,200 139,120 1,25:,080 Extension North, Re-construct Masch 9ranch Road around end of Runway., (1993) 6. Extend North Runway and Taxiway 10945,280 194,528 11750,752 15001, move all I.L.S. 1500' North and install Taxiway lights. (1994) 7. Executive Jet Parking Apron 242,300 24,230 218,070 100' x 150'. (1994) 8, commercial service Apron 480' x 195,900 19,590 176,310 150'. 9. New Terminal Facilities NODE. Theavaemainingffi u is will the completion of the New Master Plan. 10. Automobile Parking Facilities with Security Gate;i at Entrance, 11. crash/Fire Rescue Facility. 1 46 r` +[NI I~ V /Vonda No. , s Page 2 AOonda Ilon/.o_ (p~,,, 0119 TOTAL 10% 90% ESTIMATED LOCAL FAA 4 PRQ7ECT COST FUNDS FUNDS 12. New Fuel otorage Facility 13. Water/Sewage to West Side of Airport 14. Land Acquisition foj_ Parallel Runway and Taxiway 15. Construct Parallel Runway/Taxiway with Holding Aprons on West Side of Airport 16. Stub Taxiways between Runways 17/35 and New Runway 17L - 35R 17. I.L.S. System and High Intensity Lighting System 18. Install P.A.P.I. System 19. Construct West Aircraft Parking Aprons 20. West Side Automobile Road System 21. New Terminal Facility on West Side 22. Control Tower 23. Automobile Parking Facility West Side This Design Criteria is for Airport Class C & D for-Aircraft Groups 4 &-5. - C 6~1 is 6gaoda No. ~ •00.~ ,t~enda Iloni~ d' 9 November 6, 1991 Jerry Clark City Engineer City of Denton 215 E. McKinney St. DkInton, TX 76201 Dear Mr. Clark: The residents in the Scripture area Would like to request that storm drainage and a new street be built through the Capital Improvement Program as soon as possible. This area was built without proper drainage, and consequently each time it rains heavily, many homes experience flooding problems. Many of the residents have lived here for years and have had recurrent flooding problems. We, the residents of the Scripture area, formally request that this he presented to the Planning and Zoning commission through the CIP program. We appreciate your consideration. sincerely, trp I k ru i4 'Q /7 .Scr'~nTM ,o,rvro,v, r4 76zol sir r ? ~lL/l~(lll~tf~~^L~lil(rt`[., .11zy> ~S/ ~c yYc.~~I \~y .f~ HQ~s-reA) fiz. DEuro 4L)i 7&Z-0 r SC 'TP PFIV To awl/ n I )A Agenda No. Agenda ftom_ k Dlte _a-1~~~ . I9 If CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76P01 Octcbnr 18, 1991 M. F. Payne i 2111 Scripture Denton, TX 76201 Dear Mr. Paynes r would like to go over the conversation we had in August with regard to your tD~ home on Scripture. Scripture was designed and constructed many years ago without any storm sewers. You had mentioned that the road did not seem to match the lay of the land very well. We had taken some shots for elevation along the curb and to check elevation differences between the street and your borne. The key point to your problem 1a that your house was built well below the street. The driveway was constructed to route water that would come from Scripture diroct.ly into your garage, Solutions to the problem include the followings 1. :Repour the drive so it is not a direct flume to the garage, You should also do some regrading along the front and Bides of your house to got water to flow positively towards the back. 2. Storm sewers and street reconstruction could provide limited help by catching the water prior. That system could coat the City around $100,000+, if the street is reconstructed including curbs and driveways, that would add another $50,000 to $100,000 to lower the street to match elevations on the south without negatively effecting the north side. We had discussed that item 2 would have to be funded by the Capital improvement , Program. A majority of your neighbors would have to express their desires to Planning and Zoning and the City Council to get the City to fund it. You agreed that you would try to get that sort of community support. The curb ponds a small amount of water but is not a major problem. if the major project was funded, it would have to remove any repair work we do now. I had not promised to repair anything in the next 3 months. It is my understanding that you are trying to build community support for the project. Regardless, the next CIP public hearing will be held in February at the Planning and zoning meeting. Please call Planning at 566-8350 to get details or write a letter to me expressing your interests. Again, the more community support you have, the better Planning and Zoning will rate ycur projFat. Please advise if you need more information. Sincerely, 4rp~ C1 rk) P.E. Director n Engineering & Traneportaticn C 8171566.8200 D/FW ME TRO 434.2529 ti 1 ( t` I CITY COUNCII k .r+✓A A oo~ooooaaooa o °0ac _ o~~ s a poo~~ o xo c a Oo oQpOp~po ,v, rt Qo~Owo ~7CQG ~Q~ C .y r. F r v a CITY OF DENTON~ MEMORANDUM ~tponda No. __.9.,200$" DATE: February 18, 1992 TO: Mayor and City Council U, FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City N,anager SUBJECT: PROPOSED STUDENT ADVISORY BOARD SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION Mayor Bob Castleberry and I met with student representatives f,om Texas Woman's University and the University of North Texas he discuss the formation of a student advisory board. From the discussion, it was obvious that the students had given the idea a grew. deal of thought. Their suggestion is that the city council create a student advisory board. The proposed advisory board would consist of seven (7) student8 appointed by the City Council. They would serve one (1) year terms starting July 1. Three (3) of the students would come from the Student Government Association of Texas Woman's University and three (3) students from the Student Association of the University of North Texas. Each group would sulect and provide the Council with the names of the appointments plus one (1) alternate. In even numbered years, UNT would provide an additional appointment to serve as chair of the board. In odd-numbered years, TWU would provide an additional appointment to serve as chai 4 r. The students also want the flexibility to provide ex-officio appointments for the student council presidents of any Denton high school. Both student governments hold their elections in late spring. At that time, they would also select their representatives for appointment by the Council during the June-July city boards and commissions appointments process. The proposed board would be advisory and responsible for making recommendations to the Council and other boards or commissions on issues and ordinances affecting the university student community. The board could create committees to carry out the purpose of the Board. Their first annual meeting would be during the summer after the Council appointments. Then starting the fall semester, board meetings would occur in September, October and November. During the spring semester, the board would meet in February, March and April. Each semester, the council and board woi:.ld conduct a joint \ work-session to discuss the boards work and progress. i r ~ U d 1 City Council Agenda Report Fonda ;r _~2,"~C~~ Proposed Student Advisory Hoard Agarnda Ifom _ 1~e~r February 1$, 1992 r Page 2. Daly As you can see, the students have been busy thinking about how the//yf1 can assist local government and are ready to formalize the process. I have assigned Jesus to be the staff liaison to the group and he will continue that role if a board is created. If the Council likes the proposal, then staff recommends that we ' prepare an ordinance creating a board for your consideration at the March 3 meeting. At that time, we would also have the names of the students to be appointed for the interim period. Prepared by: esu Nava,, Jr~ _ Ass tant to the Cit Hager A4,d r bd by: V, Harrell City Manager Dc NCOUNCIL 9 pppooooaaao ~0°0 ooo~ ~ ti,, o0 Q ~ 40 O °~OOy r ° x z e Opp~o °OOOQCa~cooop r ` Agenda tJo. Agenda Rem_XLt~~ __----g1TY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 1~ 2-0 Dail 'r Wf JANUARY 21, 1992 /T J147 - 07, I The Council convened into the work Session at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Council Members Alexandei, Chew, Perry, Smith and Trent. r ABSENT: Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins 1. Presentation and discussion of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, the Single Audit, and the Management Letter for the year ended September 30, 1991. Kathy DeBois, Director of Accounting and Budget operations, stated that the annual audit had been completed as was the comprehensive annual financial statement for the fiscal year 1990-91. The report had been presented to the Audit Committee on January 14, 1992 at which time the committee recommended that the report be forwarded to Council. George Scott, Deloitte and Touche, stated that three documents had been discussed with the Audit Committee. One was the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. The Financial Report had been prepared by staff and audited by Deloitte and Touche. Their audit was to determine reasonable assurance that the financial statements were free of material misstatements. In order to reach that opinion, they looked at a variety of documents, perform numerous types of tests, and interviewed staff and management throughout the city. Throughout the process, they received all copies and records requested and received the cooperation of both staff and management. During the course of the audit, there were no disagreements with management as to the proper application of accounting principals and methodologies. An opinion was reached that the financial statements were presented fairly in all material respects, The second document was the Single Audit. It was a series of reports concerning compliance with federal laws and regulations and internal controls both with the City as a whole and those controls over the federal programs. Each one addressed a different area as required by various federal laws and regulations. The majority of those addressed complied with federal laws and regulations. There were no instances identified that were significant violations of federal laws and regulations. There were no situations identified which were thought to be material weaknesses in the internal control structure. There were some areas in which controls could be enhanced which were presented in the third document, the Report to Management. Lloyd Harrell, City manager, stated that the audit report was t, J ~ { r Agenda Na. ~ 2' 4 City of Denton City Council Minutes Agendaltom~ January 21, 1992 Page 2 We ~=1 •~.2 2 ~ Lid favorable and that only minor adjustments were recommended. 2. The council received a report and held a discussion on recommended building renovations and gave approval of a priority list. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that this program was discussed during the budget process. There was a concern that major problems «r were developing in City facilities and were not being addressed. The Council made a commitment during the last budget process to increase the tax rate a minor amount to service a debt which the City could issue to try and attack the backlog of maintenance needs. The tax increase would allow the City to complete approximately $696,000 worth of renovation projects to City buildings. Bruce Hennington, Superintendent of Facility Management, stated that the proposed ranking of projects consisted first of emergency requests which dealt with safety and the requests which dealt with areas where the building was deteriorating such as a leaking roof. Council Member Perry asked what Oldrops out" meant on the ranking. Hennington replied that those were items which required minor maintenance which could be done in the current year's budget. Council Member Perry asked if there were plans to work on the Campus Theater roof. City Manager. Harrell replied that that was the responsibility of the Arts Council. Council Member Alexander asked at what level of management structure the decision was made on which project would be included and which project would have to wait. Hennington replied that each request submitted by staff was ranked first by safety, then those requests which dealt with a deteriorating asset, those which affected citizens, and those which could be held to the following year. He then ranked those requests based on staff input and presented them to the Executive Staff. Council Member Trent asked about the #5 ranking - Security Fire System. Hennington replied that portions b., c., and d. were being recommended which consisted of fire/smoke detectors, door handicap push bars and an automatic door. Portion a., security card system, .r c ii 2. lgenda Plo. Ike Os - Council minutes Agenda Itam City of Denton City Doe January 21, 1992 page 3 was too expensive to include in the project. Council member Trent asked about #16 - renovate parking lot at Fire Station #4. the first bid was for $230000. A later Bennington replied that estimate was for $22,700. dra es. Where would a council Member rent asked about #29 - library p those be Placed. Hennington replied that they would go in the Children's Area, the Non-fiction Area and the video Area. the li City Manger Harrell pointed out hat #34 on itoring t stpr ld be to hire an individual to assist on Workp a report and held " a Use of discussion less lace" and proposed 3. T "SmokelFree received proposed Tobacco Products" policies and gave staff direction. !~elisha Cochran, personnel Generalist, statedevethat nt b he cSurgeon General had called smoking "the single most p death" in the united States. it had been reported that ,smoking deaths in the United was responsible for more than 1 in every 6 es each in healthy non-smokers. smokers. year." Research had also deteu~gecancer~involun cry smoking was a cause of disease, including wlu presented to Council 9g~8 ariar app smoking p January, 1 roved with a condition that a report be ma ' made on its effectiveness. if ndhproceedtwithra policy avoc•to abl totally City was to rescind the policy ban smoking. From 1987 through 1990 a number of complaints, the aced Personnel nthe D4arch/AP it 1990 health problems, were received in l result, a survey question was p 58% felt that the Employee Newsletter, of the 74 respondents, in January 1991, the Executive Committee policy was not working. requested that an alternative policy be prepared. The alternative resented t:o the Wellness gal for review and was pr policy went to Le the Wellness ority o£ Committee for the need for aistronger policy; however, a committee agreed w number of concerns were voicFd in the police Department. As a result, the city Manager requested the Policy Committeea review the proposed policy and make a recommendation. Thelic ay Committee Directors recommended to move forward with the proposed po y. r wide and Division Managers received copies of the proposed policy were asked to brief their employees and enr.ourage them to p roach other it wadetserrmineecommewhat the City feedback. A survein phis been area done cities were using a City of Denton City Council Minutes Agenda No. January 21, 1992 Agenda itOm_ JC r Page 4 Lbfo 7 revise the existing policy and adopt two policies to address the smoking and tobacco products issues. The "Smoke-Free Workplace" policy would prohibit the use of smoking tobacco products within any municipal facility with the exceptions of suspects and witnesses in designated areas of the Police Department during interviews and interrogations and smoking would be permitted in a designated area of the jail for inmates only. Smoking would be ° prohibited in City of Denton vehicles with the exceptions of employees who were assigned a take-home vehicle could smoke in that vehicle if permission was obtained in advance from all other passengers, smoking would be allowed in department "pool vehicles" provided that non-smoking "pool vehicles" were designated and available, and provided that permission was expressly obtained in advance from all other passengers and smoking would be allowed in open air vehicles such as heavy equipment. Council Member Alexander asked if a non-smoking vehicle would be available. Cochran replied that a non-smoking vehicle would be available at all times. The use of smokeless tobacco products would be prohibited in all office environments, enclosed work facilities, and areas where sanitation was a problem or concern, as designated by the area supervisor. Employees who violated the policies would be subject to disciplinary action. City employees who experienced performance or personal difficulties while breaking the nicotine addiction could seek help through the Employee Assistance Program. The implementation date of June 1, 1992 was suggested in an effort to put into place a program that wold help those interested employees with smoke cessation. Council Member Alexander asked for conditions when smokeless tobacco could be used. Tom Klinck, Director of Personnel, replied field areas would be areas where it could be used. Council Member Trent asked if there would be designated smoking areas in City buildings. Klinck replied that there would be no smoking in any city buildings. Council Member Trent asked about the jail. The prisoners could smoke but the employees could not. Klinck replied that the employees would have to go outside to smoke. 4. } k , Agonda No. Agentla Ilon:_...~.'1.+L.~----.-P-•:, - ~ City of Denton City Council Minutes Date -J&ju January 21, 1992 V, S g"I 1 Page 5 f consensus of the Council was to proceed with the policies. q, The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding direction. Denton and possible funding brconditions gave tstaff he City alternatives Rick Svehla, Deputy city Manager, stated that three structures were , Branch Creek, Mayhill at pecan Creek, concern - hr at Lane y at il Road and Hobs southern been barricaded The bridge at Cooper Creek and M'Phe ll whole Road since the last part of Novamber. by affic could and the the bridge had shifted, and it was felt that the Cy longer to use it. The bridge was jointly owned County and the City had been attempting to discuss solutions with them for the last month or so. An interim solution with the County would involve removing the old structure. The County would buy rros ery large culverts, ituatinaltheeroadnwoulduhave to be b rnri~caded. vThe heavy rain long term solution involved the total replacement of the bridge. The total replacement would be funded on a 50/50 basis at a cost of approximately $60,000. The second structure at Mo ei culverts at this location. of them was beginning to settle due to erosion underneath the pipe. New head walls and tow walls were $12,000 dwitfor h citysforces structure, a large amount of the exc vati n and fill activities. The third structure at Hobson Lane and Fletcher repair this estimated to be 20-25 years old. it was possible A structure, however, due to the age of the structure, it was recommended to build a new structure. Precast "crown spans" would be used for an estimated cost of $115,000. Funding for the three projects would be with street and drainage bonds. There was no recommendation from the 191 Committee due to the short time factor. Consensus of the council was to proceed. 5. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters (considered action andnperso neof Dent-on v. and appo rtmentsl structures. 2ncy), The Council then convened into the Regular Session at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Council Members Alexander, Chew, c , .4 a Vj ti City of Denton City Council Minutes No. Agenda January 21, 1992 Page 6 pD©ndaItem Dare Perry, Smith and Trent. U ~r ABSENT: Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins 1. Pledge of Allegiance The council and members of the audience recited the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Resolutions of Appreciation A. The Council considered approval of a resolution of appreciation for Murl Calvert, The following resolution was considered: RA92-002 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR MURL CALVERT Alexander motioned, Chew seconded to approve the resolution, on roll vote, Trent "aye", Alexander I'aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry ''aye". unanimously. Motion carried B. The Council considered approval of a resolution of appreciation for Ike Splawn, The following resolution was considered: A RA92-003 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR IKE SPLAWN Perry motioned, Trent seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Trent Mayor "Castlend r "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry Ilt', and y y "aye". Motion carried unanimously, 3. Citizen Reports A. The eived zen representative of theiYouthcIn Government tProgramreport from a Roja Dilmore presented background information on the Youth in Government Program. Youth in Government was an organizatiin of high school students who learned how State and local worked. She statsd that the students had held a mock governments meeting in the afternoon. Topics discussed included redistricting, t Y. City of Denton City Council Minutes Agenda No. Agendallom~.~Z January 21, 1992 q ~z~' Page 7 Date `r curbside recycling, the planning and zoning of the Food Lion store, commercial solid waste and the sign ordinance. Results of their discussions indicated that they were in favor of the redistricting plan recently adopted; curbside recycling would be doubled to determine if it were cost effective, a $.50 per month charge would be added to cover the cost with a time limit to build a RDF plant in 1994; the Food Lion store was approved but delivery times would be changed to accommodate school times; and the commercial solid waste issue was approved as was the sign ordinance. p 4. Public Hearings A. The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance approving a detailed plan for a portion of Planned Development No. 72 for the purpose of a retail grocery store on a 4.116 acre tract of land located at the southeast corner of N. Locust Street and Windsor, adjacent to Strickland Junior High School. Z-91-021 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-1 at their meeting of January 8, 1992.) Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that the infrastructure at the site was in place. The site plan showed that a right turn would be built by the developer off Locust. Five feet of right-of-way would be dedicated in order to make the right-of- way 50 feet from centerline. Sidewalks would be installed on Locust, Drainage was of particular concern, especially at the neighborhood meeting. City regulations require that the site not create a flooding hazard for anyone off-site or on-site. The applicant chose to build a detention pond as opposed to major off- site improvements, Water from the detention pond would slowly filter out into an existing drainage channel. Landscaping far exceeded the standards. The applicant was proposing that three foot high berms supplemented with trees and shrubs be planted to partially screen the neighbors west of Locust and north of Windsor. A bufferyard with a six foot high screening wall was proposed along the southern and western portions of the tract and would terminate inside the property near the northeast portion of the site. The Denton Independent School District had requested that a permanent fence be built around the detention pond, that a temporary fence be built around the construction site and had requested that no deliveries be allowed between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m, and 2:30 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. Staff recommended that the permanent fence around the detention pond be deleted from the ordinance conditions. It was felt that the fence was not necessary as the water in the pond would not be any deeper than 3 feet and would be there for only a short period of time. it could detract from the aesthetic character of the open space by having a fence around it. It might also add to maintenance problems for Food Lion. Y. t I f City of Denton City Council Minutes 4. January 21, 1992 Aaonda No. Page 8 Agenda Item-. M Rate " .2' I The Mayor opened the public hearing. • 9 Jerry Cott spoke in favor. He stated that Food Lion had always been a good neighbor in the areas where he had built and operated his factories. He stated that Food Lion reduced the price of groceries 5-8% in one year when they entered a market. The citizens of Denton needed money back from reduced groceries. If there were too many restrictions placed on the proposal, then it would be cost prohibitive to Food Lion. T. R. Hays stated that he was in favor of the project but was, opposed to the staff recommendation of removing the permanent fence around the detention pond. He felt it could place Food Lion in a liability situation if a child fell into the pond. He recommended that Council not remove that restriction. Arlene Morrison stated her concerns about the proposal. She felt that there were enough supermarkets in the area without adding another store. She felt it was a poor location. The store would have large trucks making deliveries and they would not want to have to wait until the school rush was over, she felt that the zoning was spot zoning. Barbara Fisher was against the staff recommendation to remove the fence around the detention pond. Many elementary school children passed by the area and a pond with no fence was a potentially dangerous situation. The cost inviting thing for a young child could be a pool of water whether it be two feet deep, three feet deep or six feet deep. A child could easily drown in those amounts of water. One child's death was not worth the looks of any grocery store. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Robbins indicated that there was a condition in the ordinance which dealt with the delivery times as recommended by the School District to avoid trucks being there during the peak hours of the school.. It was felt that this was not spot zoning as the property was zoned Planned Development in 1984 for neighborhood service. The Planning and Zoning Commission felt this was an appropriate use. Mayor Castleberry noted that he had not given the petitioner a chance for rebuttal and offered the petitioner time to speak. Phil Able, Project Manager for Food Lion, stated that they had no problems with any of the three conditions. He felt the fence around the detention pond was not a problem. It would be a small maintenance problem and may not be aesthetically pleasing. It \I AN r Ye _ i Fi Agonda No, .Z ODS' City of Denton City Council Minutes Agondallom-&Jz- Pagea9y 21, 1992 Date might also act as a barrier in the event that a child went in during a full pond. Council Member Smith asked why staff was recommending that the fence around the detention pond ba removed. Robbins stated that one of the reasons was for aesthetic reasons. It could detract from the open space and it was not necessary for safety reasons as the pond was relatively shallow even when completely full. There would also be maintenance problems " associated with the fence. Council Member Smith stated that it only took one time to have a terrible accident. She asked if Traffic Safety and others had looked at the entrances and exits and felt that two were adequate for this size facility. Robbins replied yes that they were adequate and within City specifications, Council Member Perry suggested that the permanent fence be made of materials which could be seen through and as there was no major objection from the petitioner, that the fence be built, Council Member Alexander asked about the size of the detention pond. Robbins replied that it was approximately 10,000 square feet, Council Member Alexander stated that it would not be filled with water except during times of serious rain, It would then drain down to no water at all and would drain within a matter of hours after a rain had stopped. Robbins replied correct, Council Member Trent stated that if the pond were fenced, it might attract children to see what was behind the fence. He asked if the restrictions on deliveries meant ingress and egress or just ingress. Robbins replied deliveries only. council Member Trent stated that trucks could leave during that time. Robbins replied correct. %a Agenda flu. City of Denton City Council Minutes Agenda ltom.TJ~ January 21, 1992 //pp qq~~ Page 10 iJalo IP 1+ -Al 7I Council Member Trent asked about the size of curb cuts as in the past there had been problems with large trucks not being able to negotiate the size of the entrance. Able replied that all of the large trucks would enter through Windsor and would not come in the other entrance. There were 301 4 radius/ on all of the returns. Council Member Trent asked about vehicles moving southbound on Locust to enter into the southern entry. Would that stack traffic if a car were trying to make a left turn southbound or would there be a way to keep traffic going around. Robbins replied that ultimately there would be a way for traffic to go around. The traffic impact analysis indicated that there would not be many cars stacking up and certainly not up to the intersection. council Member Trent asked for an approximately cost of construction of the facility. Able veplied about $2 million including the land. The building would be approximately $1.2 million. The following ordinance was considered: No. 92-010 AN ORDINANCE OF' THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A DETAILED PLAN FOR 4.116 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT R DRIVE AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE BINTEEINGRSECTION PART OF OPLANNEDODEVELOPMENT LOCUST STREET (F.M. 2164), DISTRICT NO. 72) PROVIDING FOR H PENALTY IN THE14AXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Trent motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance with the listed restrictions. On roll vote, Trent "aye", Alexander "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance rezoning a 19.8 acre tract of land from the Planned Development District (PD 95) '.:o the Single Family Residential (SF- 16) diotrict on property located on the east side of Hinkle Drive between the Denton center Shopping Facility and the Good Samaritan Village. Z-91-019 (The Planning and zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0 at their meeting of December 11, 1991.) 4 N City of Denton City council Minutes 0100nda No. ~9 S January 21, 1992 Page 11 AQonda Item Date' « z ' 7W Frank Robbins, Executive Director for pla 7T,' 11 stat Was a substantial downzoning from a Plannedn Devel pment toasinhis family-16 residential lots. The infrastructure was in support the development and all policies of the Denton Developsment t + plan had been met. The Mayor opened the public hearing, John Zimmerman spoke in favor of the proposal. He stated that this was a downzoning. It would fit the needs of Denton more than the present zoning. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Council Member Perry questioned the drainage in the area. would be responsible for maintaining the drainage. Who Robbins replied that the drainage details would be considered during the platting process. The following ordinance was considered; NO. 92-011 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 95 (PD-95) TO ONE-FAMILY DWELLING (SF-16) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 19.8 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HINKLE DRIVE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000,00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Alexander motioned, Smith seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "~ye~l, Alexander "aye,', Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry ayelr, Motion carried unanimously. of anC ordin nCe unncil held a public hearing and considered adoption cifi tract of land locatedoonnthe ea t side ofe Hinklet a 4'82 acrd the Denton Center Shopping Facility, for the Purpose recta health facilit Y behind ofca recommended approval Z-91-020 (The Planning and Zoning' personal commission 6-0 at their meeting of December 11, 1991.) Frank Robbins 1991,) was a EXecuti.ve Director for Planning, stated t1lat this \ traditional nursing care building, There would be much landscaping on the Hinkle side of the devela pment and the elevation 7 City of Denton City Council Minutes ADendaNo,Q January 21, 1992 Apanda ltam S .Z Page 12 Date _ g" rT for the project would be adopted. All conditions for the specific Use Permit had been met. o The Mayor opened the public hearing. John Zimmerman stated that raising the elevation would not affect the area. The estimated cost of construction was $2-3 million. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 92-012 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC r USE PERMIT FOR A PERSONAL HEALTH CARE FACILITY, ON 4.82 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HINKLE DRIVE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2000 FOR VIO.LATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Trent motioned, Perry seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye", Alexander "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance rezoning a .7675 acre tract of land from the Planned Development (PD40) and single Family Residential (SF-7) Districts to the Multifamily-1 (MF-1) District on property located at the southeast corner of Hell Avenue and Withers Street, Z-91-018 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0 at their meeting of December 11, 1991.) Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that all infrastructure was in place, There would be sidewalks on bell/Withers. The property was in a moderate activity center and the Planning and Zoning commission had found that all the policies of the Denton Development Guide had been met. The Mayor opened the public hearing. Marvin Morgan stated he would like to construct an apartment complex consisting of 24 one bedroom, one and one-half bathroom studio apartments. The architecture design and the landscaping around the apartment would enhance the area. It would also help with the overcrowding conditions Denton was currently experiencing ` with apartments.-- 4 n Agenda No, City of Denton City Council Minutes Agenda llmn._ January 21, 1992 Page 13 Dale ••-a2 2 I3~-~l No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. ► The following ordinance was considered: NO. 92-013 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 40 (PD-40) AND ONE-FAMILY DWELLING (SF-7) TO MULTIFAMILY DWELLING-1 (MF-1) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 0.7675 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BELL AVENUE AND WITHERS STREET; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Trent seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye", Alexander "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor. Castleberry "ayell. Motion carried unanimously. E. The council held a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance approving the rezoning of a 1.63 acre tract of land from the single Family Residential (SF-10) District to the Planned Development District and approve a detailed plan for medical offices and accessory uses on property located on the east side of Bonnie Brae, approximately 800 feet south of University Drive. Z- 91-017 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 4- 2 at their meeting of December 11, 1991.) ' Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that the infr4structure was in place for the proposal. Storm water would be detained on site and would run directly into the storm sewer. The site was in a low intensity area. Staff and the Planning and Zoning commission had completed a disproportionate share analysis of intensity. The Landscaping and Tree Preservation ordinance required a minimum of 20% landscaping in the strest yard. The proposed landscaping plan showed 56%, which was more than twice of what was required. The Mayor opened the public hearing. Fred Gossett spoke in favor, representing Dr. Yanks, the petitioner. }le stated that Dr. Yanke had bee,i very sensitive in her efforts to preserve the integrity of the neighborhood and be a r good neighbor. The design of the buildings would not detract from \ the neighborhood and would not negatively impact the quality of life of the surrounding residents. c 1 r. - Ei f Awn No. City of Denton City council Minutes AgonLia ltom Rt i January 21, 1992 0.te._0•/~ Page 14 Council Member Perry asked for more details on the drainage. Gossett replied that there would be no depth of water of any consequence. There was a small parking area which would catch the water and slowly drain it to the storm sewer on Bonnie Brae. The Engineering Department of the City felt that there would not be a ' problem with such a design and would handle the runoff adequately without impacting any of the neighborhood. Council Member Trent asked about the size of the buildings. Gossett replied that one building would be 3500 square feet and two would be 3000 square feet, as proposed. Council Member Smith asked :chat was between the church and the proposed development. Gossett replied that the Church property went up to the proposed development property. Dr. Marilyn Yanke stated that two of the buildings would be 3500 square feet and one would be 3000 square feet. She enjoyed a lot of landscaping and that was reflected in her proposal. G. R. Rawley spoke in opposition. His property was located directly behind the proposal. He was concerned with a number of items on the proposed plan. As the plan was now designed, the easement behind the proposal was 161. There was 8' between the easement and the bottom part of a terrace. The terrace ran right behind his house 161 which was 241. The top of the terrace would be under two of the buildings, A lot of dirt would be required if it were built that way or there would have to be very tall piers. The bottom of the terrace was 8" over the easement which meant that all of the holly and other landscaping shown as screening was down in the 81 area. It would be lower than the lot which would be about 41 higher. The screening was not adequate. The plans called for Burford Holly which would not grow very tall and it would not screen the terrace much less the parking lot. He was glad to see that residents could now build on the city's easement. From the proposed plans, building would take place on the easement. Someone had not surv3yed correctly when they indicated that there would not be any drainage to the back of the property. when he bought the property, he thought the neighborhood would be residential, He felt that all the water would drain to the back of the property and into his property. There was no rebuttal from the petitioner. Y. i' h Agenda No. _ DD- llem__oJ, City of Denton City Council Minutes Agenda January 21, 1992 fbte 4 7 page 15 17 The Mayor closed the public hearing. Robbins stated that the existing topography and what would be required to be done to execute the landscape plan which included a s correctly good deal of berming and planting in the back wa stated by Mr, Rowley. Rawley was also COlatting processe details of ll felt about th surveying. That would occur in the p that it could be executed and that it would not be inwothe uld ay of an of an easement. It would not be a drainage problem more site work than what was currently there. Council Member Alexander stated that berming might occur over the ^ easement but no construction would occur over the easement. Robbins replied correct. Council Member Perry stated that the pro}ect would not have a negative impact on the drainage in the area. Robbins replied correct. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 92-014 ONEFFAMTHE CITY OF ILY TEXTOAPS PROVIDING FOR A DEVELOPMENT AN ORDINANCE CHANGE E FROM (PD) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION F 1.63 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF BONNIE BRAE, APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET SOUTH OF WEST UNIVERSITY DRIVE; PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF A DETAILED PLAN FOR THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FORD AN EFFECTIVE$DATE. FOR Perry motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On erry vote, Trent "aye", Alexander "aye", Smith "aye", Chew aye,, Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. F. The council held a public hearing and considered the preliminary and final replat of Lots 15 and 16, Block 4, Hillside Addition; into Lots 15A and 16A. The .312 acre site was located at 91 -028 the southwest corner of Fannin and Bernard recommended tapproval 6 0 at their Planning and Zoning commission meeting of January 8, 1992.) stated that this lat Director requiring Paan public hearing. The Frank Robbins, Executive was a residential p ty C i'. I i J { j~ ~i l AUonde No, City of Denton City Council Minutes AQondaltonil_._lSra~~c.~ January 21, 1992 Kato Page 16 infrastructure was in place to support the development. Curb cuts would only be on Fannin Street which would improve the traffic flow on Bernard Street. The Mayor opened the public hearing. ' John Johnson, owner of the property, spoke in favor. He felt it was a housekeeping matter. The lots were originally platted on an east/west axis in the late 18901s. In 1947 the property was divided on a north/south axis. By turning the lots around 90 degrees, the lots could be made into lots that were 60' by 1001. That met current requirements. He thanked staff, particularly Owen Yost, for his assistance on the project. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Smith motioned, Alexander seconded to approve the preliminary and final replat. on roll vote, Trent "aye", Alexander "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry 10aye't, and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. G, The Council was to have held a public hearing and considered an ordinance amending ordinance number 91-101 concerning sign review criteria and process for PD 142, Hillcrest. PD 142, Hillcrest, was 245 acres in size and was located east of IH-35N and along IH 35 from Highway 77, Loop 288. Z-91-022 (The Planning and zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0 at their January 8, 1992 meeting.) Mayor Castleberry stated that the item had been pulled at the request of the developer, Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that a number of months ago, as the project was announced for the community and discussion began with the developers, it was recognized that because of the size of the project, there needed to be some flexibility into the signage of the property so that it could be incorporated into the architectural design of the project. Since that time, work had been done on trying to allow that type of flexibility to occur. Initially it was felt that that flexibility could be gained by having the applicant follow the special sign district provisions within the sign ordinance with the exception of the 600' threshold. This procedure would work for everyone involved. That recommendation was taken to the Planning and zoning Commission and it voted 6-0 in support of that particular proposed ordinance. Because of all of the hard work done by the Legal Department, the A~ r. a Agenda No. _ 4006~ , city of Denton City Council Minutes Apendalt~O~mae. =cSL_e January 21, 1992 Outs x ro Page 17 City received subsequent legal input that because the project was located in a planned development and not in straight zoning by the City, the amendment was no longer necessary to allow the development to have the flexibility needed. The flexibility would occur when a site plan, which was required in a planned development, was submitted to the Planning and Zoning commission on which all signage in the project would be specified irrespective of the 6001 threshold. Any development which would occur within the E planned development, a final site plan would have to be filed and reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Comments had been heard, including some in a recent newspaper article, that the sign ordinance on this project was not being adhered to so that the project could occur in Denton. tie assured the Council that that was not the case. In the planned development process, it was very clearly specified that the criteria which the Planning and Zoning Commission must use in approving any kind of signage that was proposed for the project. A detailed site plan would be filed and the Manning and Zoning Commission, before they could authorize any deviations from the current sign ordinance, must find that the plan submitted was clearly superior and provided corresponding aesthetic benefits which merited deviations from the sign regulation and arose from the design of the project. The spirit of the sign ordinance must be followed with any kind of filing with the Planning and Zoning Commission. The developer and the City staff would have to make a case to the Planning and Zoning Commission why the signage proposed would be superior to the signage required under the sign ordinance. The Planning and zoning commission must find that that would be the case and must put those findings in writing. Item 6.1. was considered. 6, ordinances I. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance directing the publication of notice of intention to issue City of Denton Utility System Revenue Bonds, and directing the issuance and publication of notice of sale of said bonds. John McGrane, Executive Director for Finance, stated that the city charter required that prior to the notice of intent to sell bonds, that an advertisement be placed 30 days In advance of the sale. The proposed ordinance provided for that publication. It would be published in a national financial publication and a local publication. Item 6.1. was for $4.5 million In revenue bonds which were primarily for the use in the sewer plant expansion. a j . :.,_~i ti Agenda No. _..l~~ppr=~~°=~~a~ Agenda Ilom City of Denton city council Minutes Qa19 January 21, 1992 Page 18 The following ordinance was considered: No. 92-022 AN ORDINANCE DIRECTING THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENTION AND TO ISSUE CITY OF DENTON UTILITY SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE AND PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF SALE OF SAID BONDS. On roll Trent motioned, Chew seconded to adopt mith the ordinance. ay Trent 'aye", Alexander "aye", S "aye", a Perry Motion carried unanimously. uaye~+, and Mayor Castleberry "aYe" J. The council considered adoption of an ordinance of Denton the issuance and publication of notice of sale of City General stated that the same John McGrane, Executive Director foliednatoejthe City's general requirement for publication app orance with the obligation bonds. These bonds were issued i$i 5 mil lion would be 1986 election for the capital o,r vem ndrainage improvements and used for street repairs, $ $190,000 for bridge reconstruction/repair. The following ordinance was considered: No. 92-023 DIRE AND OF SALE OFCCITY OF DENT NE GENERAL OBL GATIONCBOATION NDS OF NOTICE Perry motioned, Trent seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye", Alexander "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "ayeu, and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. The Council returned to the regular agenda order. 50 Consent Agenda Council Member Trent asked that Item 5.A.7. be pulled for special consideration. Perry motioned, Smith seconded tc approve the Consent Agenda with the exception ye", A. On roll vote, Trent "aye" , Alexander " e" "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye", Smith 10 aye Chew ay' , Perry "aye:'. Motion carried unanimously. A. Bids and Purchase Orders: r, 5 a Agenda Plo. City of Denton City Council Minutes Agenda Item January 21, 1992 Page 19 Date 1. Bid #1308 - Two Man Aerial Device 2. Bid #1313 - Truck Cab and Chassis 3. Bid #1322 - Container Grown Trees 4. Bid #1303 - Belt Filter Presses 5. Bid #1316 - Single Stage Centrifugal Blowers 6. Bid #1321 - Arco Concrete Foundation 8. P.O. #21938 - Traffic Engineering and Controls, Inc. 9. P.O. #21468 - J & 5 Equipment B. Plats and Replats 1. Considered approval of the preliminary plat of the Food Lion T-2 Addition; Lot 1, Block 1. The 4.116 acre site was located at the southeast corner of Locust Street and Windsor Drive. P-91-029 (The P?.anning and zoning commission recommender' approval 6-0 at their meeting of January 8, 1992.) Item 5,A.7, was considered. Bob Nelson, Executive Director for utilities, stated that the Rone Engineering contract was an annual requirement from the Texas Health Department which required a test around the landfill to determine if there were any leach coming from the landfill. Council Member Trent asked if there was a request for more than one bid. Nelson replied no that Rone Engineering had been the consulting " engineering firm which had done that before and the ones which the City had entered into contract with to be the City's representative before the Health Department. Council Member Trent felt that on items of this size that it was customary to get at least two bids for the project, Nelson replied that it was a case of professional services in which the firm was analyzed and the price was looked at for similar services. State law prohibited competitive bidding on professional services of that sort. Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, stated that the engineers were prohibited by their code of professional ethics from bidding on the basis of the cost. Council Member Trent stated that the entering arguments on this C type of bid were the sounding points and profile points. He asked c r, lbenda No. 00'r- City of Denton City council Minutes agenda ttern January 21, 1992 Date Page 20 77 2D~ how many of each the project involved. Nelson replied that he did not have that information at this point, Council Member Trent stated that he called Rona Engineering and asked how many points there were. He also did some comparisons on his own and found out that the City was paying more money than should be for this project. That was why he was questioning not getting a second bid. city Attorney Drayovitch stated that the law provided that a City may negotiate with more than one firm but must choose the firm and then discuss the price. If a satisfactory agreement could not be reached with the firm, another firm could be chosen. City Manager Harrell replied that that was the process the staff had gone through to bring the recommendation to Council. Council Member Trent suggested that in the future more time be spent on such projects. He had been quoted a price of $7100 from a firm instead of $12,500 as quoted from Rone. Smith motioned, Alexander seconded to approve Consent Agenda Item 5.A.7. On roll vote, Trent "nay", Alexander "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry '#aye". Motion carried with a 5-1 vote. 6• Ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting a competitive sealed proposal and awarding a contract for purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. (5.A.1. - Bid #1308, 5.A.2. - Bid #1313, 5.A.3. - Bid #1322, S.A.4. - Bid #1303, 5.A.5, - Bid #1316) The following ordinance was considered: No. 92-015 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING A COMPETITIVE SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES1 PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motioned, Smith seconded to adopt the ordinance, on roll vote, Trent "aye", Alexander "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry aye . Motion carried unanimously, i h f. i konda No. .Z~DD.S City of Denton City Council Minutes Apontla Item January 21, 1992 Onte 2. Page 22 fT.~f~ B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements, (5.A.6. - #1321) The following ordinance was considered: No. 92-016 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Smith motioned, Alexander seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye", Alexander "aye", Smith 'laye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. (5.A.9 - P.O. #21468) The following ordinance was considered: No. 92-017 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. on roll vote, Trent "aye", Alexander "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Parry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried Unanimously. D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for purchases of materials or equipment which are available from one source in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. (5.A.8. - P.O. #21938) The following ordinance was considered; 4 C ti r. a r e, City of Denton Cit°nda No, ~np January 21, 1992 Y Council Minutes Agenda Item Page 22 Date NO. 92-018 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR PURCHASES OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WHICH ARE AVAILABLE FROM a ONLY ONE SOURCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Trent maticned y vote, Trent a , Perry to adopt the ordinance. "aye", and mayor o Alexander Castleberry " ay e" o Smith ',a e++ " onPerr l Y Motion carried unanimously. y E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement with Rone Engineers, Inc. for professional engineering services relating to an earth electrical resistivity survey at the Denton sanitary authorizing the expenditure of funds therefor. (5. Landfill, and #21937) A.7. P.O. The following ordinance was :onsidered: No. 92-019 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH RONE ENGINEERS, INC, FOR PROFEvSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES RELATING TO EARTH ELECTRICAL RE;,ISTIVITY SURVEY AT THE FUNDSDETHEREFORNTON PROVIDING THE AUTHOIZIN EFFECTIVE HDATEPENDITURE OF Alexander motioned, Perry seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll ' Vote, Trent "nay") Alexander '+a " aye(, Chew "aye" Perr y voe,' and Mayor Castleberry ayeu Smith t carried with a 5-1 F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute an easement from the Denton to GTE Southwest Incorporated, City of Rick Svehla, Deputy Cit their facilit y Manager, stated that GTE was easement for this rc nversionad to underground and requestedtin The following ordinance Was considered: L City of Denton City Council Minutes°nda No. January 21, 1992 Agenda If n Page 23 Data No. 92-020 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN EASEMENT FROM THE CITY OF DENTON TO GTE SOUTHWEST INCORPORATED; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Vol Perry motioned vote, Trent e er,Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance, on roll Y , Alexander Faye,,, Smith 11'aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aYe") and mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. Joe Dodd, a citizen in the audir the Council. He statedthatnthe Coune called afor d the authority to open a public a point of order requested that the Councilndoconsideration sos for r the ° next of item,°rdf.nance and G. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance amending Article II of Division II of chapter 25 ("Streets, sidewalks and Public Places't) of the code of Ordinances to re owners to repair defective sidewalks; making abutting abutting owners liable for injuries Caused by defective sidewalk s for the fixing of a g property lien for the cost of repair; and providing a penalty in the maximum amount of $500.00. providing for Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that staff was answer any Council questions. present to Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, stated that onl governing body could raise a point of order. Y a member of the Council Member Alexander stated that he realized that there were a number of people who would like to speak to the issue at the meeting but felt that the Council needed to be careful when issue was not advertised as a public such as there might be an equal number of ring and then opened as eopl an issue, He suggested hearing the staff pre a speaking against have the Council consider on how to presentation and then proceed. Council Member Trent suggested postponing the entire subject so that everyone who came to the meeting would know what to expect, 'T'rent motioned to table consideration of the item to the Council meeting in order to hold a public hearing on the next Council Members Smith, Chew and Perry agreed issue. ...iexander that perhaps staff should with outirii and then Member decide on how to handle the item, present a report Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated to City did not have an h h i~ L 5 Agenda No, City of Denton City Council Minutes Agenda item January 21, 1992 ...11 Page 24 ►bto r2 J$ ordinance which clearly spoke to the question of who should maintain sidewalks In front of property. The current ordinance was different from other citiea in the area. The proposed ordinance ` clearly made the maintenanc.a responsibility the responsibility of the landowner, It set up procedures whereby the city could step in and remedy particularly dangerous situations and then bill or attach liens to the property. The current ordinance applied only to residential areas anJ not to businesses. The proposed ordinance would clarify wording and made the procedure easier. City Manager Harrell stated that there were liability considerations for everyone involved. It v7as felt that the current provision adopted in 1966 intended !)ut the primary responsibility of maintaining the sidewalks on the property owners. There were four alternatives to consider. The first alternative was to continue business as usual. The city could continue to spend about $5000 per year trying to make a priority list of defective sidewalks and have the city pay all of the costs for doing that kind of work. A realization had to be known that there was an unknown liability exposure. There was no way that spending $5090 a year would adequately take care of the sidewalks. The second alternative was to continue business as usual but to make sure that every sidewalk in the community was in good shape to avoid a liability claim. That would require a very substantial increase in yearly expenditures that was necessary for sidewalk repairs - over and above $5000 a year, It would also require inspection time for inspection, on a regular basis, every sidewalk in the community to determine whether or not it was defective. There was no cost estimate for this alternative but in staff's opinion it was substantial and would be a cost that everyone as taxpayers would have to agree to pay as an additional charge. The third alternative spoke to the ordinance. The ordinance clearly stated that the maintenance of a sidewalk in front of a person's home or business was the responsibility of the abutting property owner. That would mean that liability would be transferred to the homeowners. Maintenance of the sidewalk would be the responsibility of the abutting property owner., There would not be a massive investigation of all sidewalks in the City and started orders issued to repair sidewalks. It would be the intention of the City that if there were a complaint on a condition of a sidewalk or an obviously dangerous situation, the City would have the authority to order the abutting property owner to repair the sidewalk. The fourth alternative would be to follow the procedure spelled out in the current ordinance. There was some concern as the current ordinance had a cumbersome process to follow, The issue was being portrayed in the newspaper that this was an attempt by the City to pass off all the charges on to the property owner. That was not the intention. The intention was to clarify what the c w ti7 li Venda No, _ r p a City of Denton City Council Minutes ANendoltom January 21, 1992 ibto Page 25, ordinance stated. It allowed the Council to go through a rational discussion about what the risk was that all of the taxpayers bore as opposed to what responsibility should be the abutting property owner and business. If a lawsuit were filed or if a substantial r amount of money were increased to maintain the sidewalks, everyone as taxpayers paid for that. Deputy City Manager Svehla stated that he had received 6 calls in opposition to the ordinance. Council Member Perry asked if the proposed ordinance would include all property, not only residential. Svehla replied that it applied to all property both residential and commercial. Council Member Smith stated that the current ordinance did not apply to business. City Manager Harrell stated that Section 25-60 stated that section 25-58 and Section 25-59 would be limited to replacement and repair of existing sidewalks abutting residential areas. Section 25-58 gave the City the authority to bear all of the cost for sidewalk replacement except for the cost of the materials which the abutting property that would that have to bear. exception did Section not apply 25-59 ton non-residential property. The proposed ordinance would make the responsibility equal for all. Council Member Trent stated that the citizens did not like the idea of Council proceeding without input from them. In regards to the City Manager's alternative #1 which was to go on with business as usual and let the city suffer the exposure, he asked the number of law suits filed within the la7t five years. City Attorney Drayovitch replied one claim and one lawsuit. council Member Trent stated that one of the other alternatives was to proceed with business as usual but to go out and improve the sidewalk situation as it currently was. fie was in favor of that alternative even if it cost a half of a million dollars. If that was what needed to be done, then it needed to be done. He did not want to raise taxes but could reprioritize some of the tax money already collected. The City was in the business of public works, public health and public safety. Everything else was gravy, if money had to be taken from some other program to make sidewalks safe, then it had to be done. In passing the proposed ordinance, C he saw a potential of extending fixed income residents to the t` c a f ~l i t 'i Agenda No. 7i2' 005 City of Denton City Council Minutes Agenda llam January 21, 1992 Dalo _~'r~~ Page 26 limit. if money were paid for ad valorem taxes, then that money should be used to repair the sidewalks. Those were public sidewalks and if the City required the sidewalks, then it should maintain them. Council Member Alexander stated that he would like Council Member ° Trent to remember at the next budget session that he was, in favor of spending a half of a million dollars on sidewalks. Council Member Trent replied that he stated also that a ;j,,, reprioritization of funds would be necessary. He knew a good place for them to come from. Council Member Alexander asked if Council Member Trent would like to specify that. Council Member Trent replied that salaries were raised this year for City employees at a figure of $750,000. That was one place to get the money from. Council Member Smith asked how an abutting property owner's liability insurance affected the sidewalk. Deputy City Manager Svehla replied that it covered any kind of walk that was on the property but did not know what it addressed in terms of what was in the right-of-way. Council Member Alexander asked for the difference between the street, curb and sidewalk on the same span of property. The City took assumption of a street in front of all property and the city repaired curbs along that same city street. A sidewalk became a point of difference not only in Denton but also in other cities in the area which tried to limit the amount of risk associated with a liability claim. One liability claim would very quickly use up a half of a million dollars. Was he correct in assuming that a distinction was being made between a sidewalk, a curb and a city street. Deputy City Manager Svehla replied that there would be no question that the new ordinance would make that distinction. Thu old ordinance was more confusing. Council Member. Trent asked who owned the sidewalks. Deputy City Manager Svehla replied the public. Council Member Trent asked if it were in an easement. C p r Agenda No..._1~c~0~ _ NI City of Denton City Council Minutes Agenda , flem,_~~rQ,~ Ra January 21, 1992 (bolo Page 26 r limit. If money were paid for ad valorem taxes, then that money should be used to repair the sidewalks. Those were public sidewalks and if the City required the sidewalks, then it should maintain them. Council Member Alexander stated that he would like Council Member " Trent to remember at the next budget session that he was in favor of spending a half of a million dollars on sidewalks. Council Member Trent replied that he stated also that a ,flv reprioritization of funds would be necessary. He knew a good place for them to come from. Council Member Alexander asked if Council Member Trent would like to specify that. Council Member Trent replied that salaries were raised this year for city employees at a figure of $750,000. That was one place to get the money from. Council Member Smith asked how an abutting property owner's liability insurance affected the sidewalk. Deputy City Manager Svehla replied that it covered any kind of walk that was on the property but did not know what it addressed in terms of what was in the right-of-way. Council Member Alexander asked for the difference between the street, curb and sidewalk on the same span of property. The City took assumption of a street in front of all property and the City repaired curbs along that same City street. A sidewalk became a a point of difference not only in Denton but also in other cities in the area which tried to limit the amount of risk associated with a liability claim. One liability claim would very quickly use up a half of a million dollars. Was he correct in assuming that a distinction was being made between a sidewalk, a curb and a city street. Deputy City Manager Svehla replied that there would be no question that the new ordinance would make that distinction. The old ordinance was more confusing. Council Member Trent asked who owned the sidewalks. Deputy City Manager Svehla replied the public. Council Member Trent asked if it were in an easement. Y. I i Agenda No. Agenda Item+o~L]~ City of Denton City Council Minutes DAQ -2L&I-o9 ~70~ r January 21, 1992 ~f Page 27 U Deputy City Manager Svehla replied that generally it was in a street right-of-way. Council Member Trent stated that that meant that he did not own the sidewalk. streets werel publicly owned and theeCity Department 4 advised him that Manager not own them. Council Member Trent stated that he did not have a deed to it. City Attorney Drayovitch stated that as a general rule in Texas, property owners owned to the middle of the street so the deed would often describe to the middle of the street. The City would have an easement or a right-of-way. When the State and Federal government acquired real estate to build highways, they would purchase from the property owners what was called fee simple. The city typically did not. Typically it was an easement so that the property owner owned to the middle of the street. Council Member Trent asked why when he had his lots surveyed to where another was and that lot ar d the show the p e essary lines, to get to the indicated ten feet was n the sidewalk was. City Manger Harrell replied that City ordinances clearly stated that the property owner was responsible for the right-of-way which was adjacent to his property for maintenance and upkeep of the property. A case could be made that the City owned the ten feet and maintaining street thand therefor at area. the mothe wing edge from the property responsible n for to City was tmotioned again table the t Council so that it could be considered in conjunction with a public hearing. ' Smith seconded the motion. Council questioned whether the er,ntion was to table or postpone to a date certain. City Attorney Drayovitch stated that she thought the motion was one be tabled until eacCouncil Member h removed motion it were then tablet would postpone wou Council Member Trent withdrew his motion and Council Member Smith withdrew her second. C r. 3 Nonda No. Agenda Ilom._._.-&5- City of Denton City Council Minutes lulu ..-1~-19-lZ January 21, 1992 h` Page 28 Trent motioned, Smith seconded to postpone consideration of the item until the February 18th Council meeting. on roll vote, Trent "aye", Alexander "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. H. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance amending Chapter 10 of the Code of ordinances to prohibit certain contracts with former council members for a certain period. + City Manger Harrell stated that the Council had reviewed this ordinance at a previous meeting and brought forward at the Council's request. There was a blank in the ordinance which specified a period of time after a council member left office that he would not be eligible for city contracts. Mayor Castleberry recalled from the Council minutes that the ordinance was to have a time frame of one year. Council Member Alexander stated that he had stated at that time that he would motion for a 90 day time period and would vote for the ordinance if it were for 90 days. Council Member Smith stated that she was not very pleased with the ordinance on the basis of the number of prohibitions. She asked the City Attorney to detail all of the prohibitions. City Attorney Drayovitch stated that there was a legal basis for items 11 2, and 4 because of the provisions of chapter 252 of the Texas Local Government Code. Those could be omitted because the State law would apply even without listing those exceptions. The third exception recognized that Council Members could have utility accounts with the City, could participate with the releaf program of the Parks Program or could swim at the City pool. All of those items were contracts with the City and where a contract treated everyone the same and no former council member would benefit from that nontract, it would be permissible. Exception #5 was for the City's benefit because a former council member may own some property that the City needed to purchase to complete a street project or to construct a new facility. That could be left out but it was included to afford some flexibility. Council Member Trent pointed out that a council member might have been instrumental in getting such a street headed in his direction. Council Member Smith agreed and felt that a 90 day delay would not be too detrimental to the city and would clear up any appearance of indiscretion. t r Y. ,y Agenda kiom_ Z City of Denton City Council Minutes Muir, ._.7'1g" January 21, 1992 `AA I Page 29 r T Council provision were left was better than al longer termtifhthat ahe f sit a t term in the ordinance. City Attorney D^ayovitch stated that that provision could be a deleted and #4 could be deleted as well. Mayor Castleberry felt that 90 days was not long enough and wanted to see a year time period. Council Member Trent asked what was Council Member Alexander's objection to a year. the objection was to the Council ordinance einegeneral. The replied e effect of his context, when looked at the applicable state law, was that the only ones affected by it were pi >fessional people within the City. Businessmen, generally, werr not in the least affected by the struck a an nimof the balance ordinance. between the abil ty ofe p ofessi nal rpeople within the City to serve on the Council as compared to business time lframe were pushed to ha year, iheewould vote against it. Council Member Smith stated that she was very much in favor of an ethics ordinance. But she was in favor of one with some teeth in it and would not vote for the proposed ordinance. The following ordinance was considered: No. 92-021 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 10 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCE TO PROHIBIT CERTAIN CONTRACTS WITH FORMER COUNCILMEMBERS FOR A CERTAIN PERIOD; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Alexander motioned, chew seconded to adopt the ordinance with a 180 day time frame. On roll vote, Trent "aye", Alexander "aye", Smith "nay", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried with a 5-1 vote. 7. Resolutions A. The Council considered approval of a resolution adopting a new Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program for the Denton Municipal Airport. (The Airport Advisory Board recommended , approval.) Aw C v. J ;i ?t Agenda P1o.Qs Agenda Ilonr1 City of Denton City Council Minutes Ui10 ~8 January 21, 1992 Page 30 Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that the City had received notice that it would be offered two grants, one for the Master Plan at the Airport and the other to proceed with acquiring property for the expansion. The following resolution was considered: • R92-007 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ADOPTING A NEW DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM FOR THE DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Trent seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Trent "aye", Alexander "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 8. The Council considered approval of an extension of a sanitary sewer line adjacent to the municipal Airport. Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that the existing hangers on the north side of Airport Drive were served by a septic system. Some of these systems were showing signs of failure. Plans to expand facilities and add hangers would incorporate land that was necessary for constructing additional septic facilities. Without a gravity sanitary sewer line, further development was essentially at a stalemate. The businesses did not meet the criteria for Economic Development funding assistance. Monies were available in the budget for miscellaneous sewer line construction and for sewer line infill. The fiscal impact could be minimized by constructing the line with in-house resources. Council Member Alexander asked if all parties at the Airport were required to hook onto the system. Nelson replied that was optional. Trent motioned, Smith seconded to approve the extension for a sanitary sewer line adjacent to the Municipal Airport. On roll vote, Trent "aye", Alexander "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 9. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, presented the following items: A. He requested canceling the study session of January 28 and moving it to February 11. Consensus of the Council was to E~ Agenda Ho. City of Denton Ci"*y Council Minutes Agenda Ilem__ January 21, 1992 0010 Page 31 reschedule the meetings as noted. B. Jim Harder, the new Director for Electric Utilities had been at the meeting but had since left. He had wanted to introduce him to the Council. 4 10. There was no official action taken on Executive Session items discussed during the Work session. 11. New Business No Council Member had an item of new business for future Council agendas. 12. The Council did not meet in Executive Session during the Regular Session. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:25 p.m. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS JENNIFER WALTERS CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ACC00036 C C c J, r Agenda Na. ~ ~oos ~ Agenda Items CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTEgMlo JANUARY 26' 1992 .7 f' IrT The Council convened into a special call session on Sunday, January 26, 1992 at 1:00 p.m. in the city Managerts Conference Room. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Council Members Alexander, Chew, Perry, Smith and Trent. ABSENT: Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins 9 1. The Council then convened into Executive Session to discuss legal matters (considered action in Texas Waste Management. Inc. v. City of Denton), real estate, and personnel/board appointments. No official action was taken. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned in open session at 2:23 p.m. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS JENNIFER WALTERS CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ACC0003A A \V L 1 `IY Y ~ I Agenda No, Agenda Itom--K . Cuts A . -IrL ~4 CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 41 1992 The council convened into the Work Session at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Ten Hopkins; Council Members Chew, Perry, Smith and Trent. ABSENT: Council Member Alexander , 1. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters (considered action in Texas Waste Management vs Citv of Denton, considered action in David Smith vs. City of_Denton, considered action in Jolynn Nichols vs, City of Denton,. considered settlement offer in claim of University of North Texas and considered action in City of Denton vs Tri-Steel Structures, inc.), real estate and personnel/board appointments (considered appointments to the Cable T. V. Advisory Board, the Plumbing and Mechanical Code Board and the Airport Advisory Board.) 2. The Council received a report and held a discussion on revised "Work Force Diversity Program". Tom Klinck, Director of Personnel, stated he would be showing the Council a video "True Colors" which would be used for employee training. This training would raise the awareness levels of employees. Council Member Perry felt that it 11ould be interesting to view men and women in a similar situation as presented in the video. The Council then convened into the Regular Session at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins; Council Members Chew, Perry, Smith and Trent. ABSENT: Council Member Alexander 1. Pledge of Allegiance The council and members of the audience recited the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. The Council considered approval of the minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 7, 1992. t1 C, 0 F~ ~I City of Denton City Council Minutes A~endaltom_^ February 4, 1992 Wl Page 2 el/ Perry motioned, Smith seconded to approve the minutes as presented. On roll vote, Trent "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "a e" Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 4 3. Presentation of Texas Department of Tran.-portation 70%+ Safety Belt Use Award. Mike West, Texas Department of Highways, stated that Denton was the fourth city tc receive this award. The Police Department had accepted two grants from the Texas Department of Transportation for the enforcement and education of the public in regard to the use of seat belts. At the end of the first three month period, a seat belt compliance rate survey indicated a 54% compliance rate for the City. At the end of November 1991 a compliance survey indicated that the City of Denton had reached a 73.9% compliance rate. A more recent survey in January indicated that the city had a 76% compliance rate. 4. Citizen Reports A. The Council received a citizen report from Dr. Nobles regarding a disannexation request. Dr. Nobles stated that he sold the property to Bellaire West in 1985 and was annexed into the City in 1986. There were unsuccessful attempts to zone the property residential. He obtained the property back in 1990. The City limits were not near the property and it was agricultural property. In May of 1991 he received a notice from the City of Denton stating that the Denton " County Appraisal District had failed to pick up the property when it was annexed in 1986. He owed back taxes since 1986. His purpose for requesting the disannexation was that there was no need for any City services on the property. More than 50% of the property was in the flood plain. He was requesting a disannexation based on the Organization of Municipal Governments - Section 43.144 - disannexation of sparsely populated area in general-law municipality. The Mayor thanked Dr. Nobles for his report. The Mayor presented proclamation for. American Heart Month. 5. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance abandoning and vacating a portion of Vine Street south of Withers street as a public street and reserving a d~ainage and utility easement therein. (The Planning and zonl)q commission recommended approval.) n Agenda No. City of Denton City Council Minutes Agenda lloni- 62 - Pagbeu3rY 4, 1992 Wto Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that the property had been rezoned for multifamily use. The City no longer had a need for Vine Street as a street but would retain a portion as an easement. " The following ordinance was considered: NO. 92-023A s+ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ABANDONING AND VACATING A PORTION OF VINE STREET SOUTH OF WITHERS STREET AS A PT;BLIC STREET; RESERVING A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT THEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motioned, Perry seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye", Hopkins "aye,,, Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 6. Public Hearings The prelimi-kiaryandCfinallrepheld a ats ofpab.7675 hearing g into Lot consider Block A, Bell. Place Addition; from Lot 1 of Bell Place, part of Lot 10 of the C. c„ Bell Addition, and part of the former right-of-way of Vine StrG,et. The proposed apartment complex was located on the southeast of Bell Avenue and Withers Street. (The Planning and Zoning Ccin-ii.ssion recommended approval unanimously at its ,,anr--,:y 22, 199;. meeting.) 1ran.k Robhi.ns, Lxecutive llirector for Planning, stated that the r-epla•i:s conforme,% to the minimum requirements of the Subdivision and Land Ueve.,.onm,nt regulations. The Mayon o po_ned ::tie public hearing. Marvin Horgr-,n, petitioner for the plaits, stated that he would be build~.ng an ap,;rtmcnt complex on the property. It would consist of three eightplex units of one bedroom, one and one half bath apartments. He felt that the architecture of the buildings would fit in with the area and would be an asset to the neighborhood. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. c i r, . tcp.;. LYE f Agenda No. City of Denton City Council Minutes Agenda Item. February 9, 1992 Ldto Page 4 r-T Chew motioned, Smith seconded to approve the preliminary and final replats. on roll vote, Trent "aye", Hopkins 'laye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council held a pubic hearing on the proposed annexation of 67.92 acres located on Forrestridge Drive north of Ryan Road. (A-60) Harry Persuad, Senior Planner, stated that the public hearing was intended to give all persons interested in the proposed annexation the right to appear and be heard. The Planning and Zoning commission was scheduled to make a recommendation on February 26, 1992. The proposed annexation had been initiated by the owners of the tract in order to facilitate zoning for residential single family development. The original annexation was for 67.92. Since then, the owners had indicated and the city had received a petition for annexation of only 23 acres. The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins asked why the petitioners had changed the amount of acreage to be annexed. Persuad replied that one of the reasons was due to property taxes , when doing the first phase of development. The property owners wanted to begin the development and then annex the rest of the property later. City Manager Harrell indicated that a decision by Council whether to annex 23 or 67 acres could be made at a later time. It was not necessary to determine that at this meeting. Council Member Smith stated that she was concerned that there was only one route in and one route out of the location. Persuad replied that that was correct. Council Member Perry asked what was the building schedule. Persuad replied that the annexation process would not be completed until April 7. The owners were starting the platting process as i, x 4 it FF t~ pp~~__ t Aganda No..~1: ~dQ Ilam_.~~.,L.es~G......-.,....... City of Denton City Council Minutes Aganda Isle February 4, 1992 Page 5 though the property were in the ETJ. To expedite the planning process, the owners were doing the platting of the property and annexation and zoning at the same time. No action was required of Council regarding the issue at this meeting. 7. Consent Agenda Council Member Trent asked for a clarification regarding Bid 01314. a Was that truck for residential collection. City Manager Harrell replied correct. Chew motioned, Smith seconded to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. On roll vote, Trent "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. A. Bids and Purchase orders: 1. Bid #1314 - Rear Load Refuse Truck 2. Bid #1323 - Wire and Cable S. Ordinances A. The Council adoption of an ordinance accepting a competitive sealed proposal and awarding a contract for purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. (7.A.1. - Bid #1314, 7.A.2. - Bid #1323) The following ordinance was considered: NO. 92-024 A AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING A COMPETITIVE SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance directing the publication of Notice of Intention to Issue Certificates of Obligation of the City of Denton. 1 Y: 1 Agenda P o.. •~pp--'- Agenda 1!em City of Denton City Council Minutes Date e ruary 4, 1992 Pa e Page 6 ' John McGrane, Executive Director for Finance, stated that this was the third of a series of certificates and bonds which the city was advertising for bidding on March 3, 1992. These certificates would pay for $725,000 worth of building improvements presented in prior Council meetings and $600,000 worth of vehicles and vehicle equipment. The maturity schedule for this issue was in three phases. A principle payout was in three years for the equipment and ten and fifteen years for the various building improvements. 9 The following ordinance was considered: NO. 92-025 AN ORDINANCE DIRECTING THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION OF THE CITY OF DENTON. Hopkins motioned, chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance establishing bicycle lanes on the west side of Hinkle Drive from U. S. Highway 380 to Windsor Drive and on the west side of Stuart Road from Sherman Drive (F.M. 428) to Hercules Street; providing for a penalty not to exceed $200.00 for a violation of provisions contained herein, and providing for publication. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that currently there was no ordinance which prohibited vehicles in the bike lanes. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 92-026 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING BICYCLE LANES ON THE WEST SIDE OF HINKLE DRIVE FROM U.S.HWY. 380 TO WINDSOR DRIVE AND ON THE WEST SIDE OF STUART ROAD FROM SHERMAN DRIVE (F.M. 428) TO HERCULES STREET; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $200.00 FOR A VIOLATION OF PROVISIONS CONTAINED HEREIN, PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Discussion was held by council as to whether to erect "no parking" signs along the bike lanes. It was suggested that if the area were to have no parking, then perhaps signs should be erected. Perry motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew aye}, Perry "aye", and mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. r r r . i .,,...l L, ' Lb✓r Agenda No. --?o2 ~r City of Denton City Council Minutes Ago Ago _nda Itom/__6_JC.~c2. February 4, 1992 Wto ¢ -1ty-~,3j v. Page 7 r T 9. Resolutions A. The Council considered approval of a resolution adopting Policy 100.01 "Equal Employment opportunity". The following resolution was considered: No. R92-008 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVING POLICY 100.01 REGARDING EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY AND WORKFORCE DIVERSITY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motioned, Hopkins seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Trent "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered approval of a resolution accepting a grant from the Federal Aviation Authority for the Airport Master Plan. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that this was one of the grants which the City had obtained from the FAA. This would be the City's formal acceptance of the grant which would be a 90/10% grant. It would allow the City to do a new master plan for the Airport. The last plan was updated in the middle 1980's. Council Member Trent asked if a sample report had been received from the firm. Svehla replied yes. Two finalists were interviewed and Coffman and Associates were chosen as they did mainly master plans. The following resolution was considered: R92-009 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A GRANT FOR THE DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Trent motioned, Smith seconded to a approve the resolution. On roll vote, Trent "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry 91aye", and Mayor. Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 10. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement between the City of Denton and Coffman and Associates, Inc, relating to planning services for the ti s r, 5 Aganda No. City of Denton City Council Minutes Apnnda liam February 4, 1992 Lbia Page S Denton Municipal Airport Master Plan. Deputy City Manager Svehla stated that this ordinance would approve the contract with Coffman and Associates to do the Master Plan. The following ordinance was considered: No. 92-027 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND COFFMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. RELATING TO PLANNING SERVICES FOR THE DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Trent "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 11. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, presented the following items: A. There would be a work session the following week for Council. He asked for items of consideration from the council regarding a study item on possible Charter revisions, B. Jennifer Walters, City Secretary, had recently completed the Texas Municipal Clerks Certification Program which he wished to acknowledge. { 12. There was no official action taken on Executive Session items discussed during the Work Session. 13. New Business The following items of new business were suggested by council Members for future agendas: A. Considered a request to rename a street from Terlingua to Nicosia. Lloyd Harrell., City Manager, stated that this was a request from Council Member Perry. The normal procedure on considering street name requests was to file the request with the Historic Landmark Commission for their recommendation and then forward to the Planning and zoning Commission. Following their recommendation, the request would be forwarded to the Council for consideration. t ti 's F9 Agenda No. JeZ- Agenda Itum~~~ City of Denton City Council Minutes btu February 4, 1992 Page 9 Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins asked if the citizens wanted to rename the street. Council Member Perry replied that the request was made to honor a man who made a number of contributions in the city. Consensus of Council was to proceed with the process. B. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins stated that she was would like to , see the Smoking Policy reexamined. She felt it was inappropriate to take away smoking from the employees but to continue to allow smoking in take-home vehicles. She felt there should be no difference between a take-home vehicle and a regular vehicle. sj'1e City Manager Harrell stated that the item could be placed on the next work session for continued consideration. C. Council Member Trent noted that there seemed to be a problem with trash on city streets and asked that more attention be placed on keeping -ahe streets clean. D. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins stated that there was increased vandalism in her area and felt that the area needed more police patrols. 14. The Council did not meet in Executive Session during the Regular Session. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:03 p.m. BOB CAETT FBERRY, MAYOR A CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS JENNIFER WALTERS CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ACC00040 C 4i CITY COUNCIL 4 OoOOOOOQQQUQou 0 e~00 a` o O~ NA ~ s O d at ~O O - C - f f 1 In apprertattan of~V}d~ "RAYMOND 880RTsO ~ WHEREAS, Raymond Short is retiring after 29 years, 7 months of dedicated service with the City of Denton since his employment on June 25, 19621 and WHEREAS, during his career with the city, Raymond short has consistently maintained an attitude of cooperation with and dedication to the stated goals of the Solid Waste Department of the City of Dentom and WHEREAS, Raymond Short has exhibited outstanding expertise, dedicating much time and effort in assisting with the work of the Solid Waste Department and has shown great spirit in encouraging community involvement in the best ' interest of the citizens of Denton; and WHEREAS, Raymond Short has always served above and beyond the mere efficient discharge-of his duties and has responded duties to his loyal, manner, in aspirit roftcooperation with mhis fellow employees, and in the best interests of the citizens of the community; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS! That council ebe !formally do cwarm onveyed to Raymond oshort in to permanent manner by spreading this Resolution upon the official minutes of the City Council and forwarding to him a true copy hereof. PASSED AND APPROVED this the & day of 2492. ~BBERRY, MAYOR ' ATTEST! JENNIFER WALTERS, ~CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM 44 DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY! - k PA r, 4 'l S CITY CQUNCII f avcoII QQ oo°~ ° ~00Oo oaa% Ilk a s a 0 ooooDo~pp r a H ~ e ~ vo~00 OGG c, y ,i DATE:February 18, 1992. CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Agerrda No, TO: Mayor and Members of the city council Agenda liontr_o$p,~n ~ Rile lam. ! 8 4 FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF 23.059 ACRES LOCATED ON FORRESTRIDGE DRIVE, NORTH OF RYAN ROAD. ,tae RECOMMENDATION: The public hearing is intended to give all persons interested in the proposed annexation the right to appear and be heard. The Planning and Zoning commission is scheduled to make a recommendation on February 26, 1992. SUMMARY: On January 7, 1992, Council adopted an annexation schedule setting the date, time and place with regards to the proposed annexation (A-60), State law requires that a service plan be prepared providing for the extension of full municipal services to the area to be annexed. The service plan, a copy of which is attached, is available for public i.ispection and will be part of the annexation ordinance. BACKGROUND: The proposed annexation has been initiated by the owners of the tract in order to facilitate zoning for residential single family (SF-16) development. The development of the tract is proposed to start in 1992. Applicationn for zoning change and platting of this tract are being processed concurrently with the annexation. The first public hearing was held on February 4, 1992 and no one spoke in favor or in opposition to the proposed annexation. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: All city service departments including Utilities, Engineering, Planning and Development, fire, Police, Solid Waste, Environmental Health, Parks and Recreation and Library. FISCAL IMPACT: The annexation and ultimate development of this area will expand the city's tax base. 4 r, f~ . Agenda No, AQBnda 110m Dale Resp fully s b itte~ Prepared by • Lloyd V. Harrell o(1 ~tatu~ City Manager Harry Persaud, AICP Approved: 0 Frank H. R ins, AICP EXeoutive Director Planning and Development's Attachments: Attachment #1: Location map. Attachment #2: Service Plan. 2 3 P 4f ATTACHMENT 1 1 Forrestridge Annexation Agenda No. Agenda Ilam_ ~5~2_-,~ Dale a~ Ae2.- /7'3JgNORTH CT. ~ ull ~ ~_•+icHVIEw cIR, ~ ~ W V) 'L Lj-J T'M9E? GREEN CIR, a C) -cc CHO-' t~ x M ROLLING HILLS CIR _ _ - EL PASEO OAK FARREST ('R. C~ AN j~ SfBAS?':aJ OI PL. ~GR QAK FCFREST CR. 1-I SANTIAGD~ PL. SANDE?5_ SITE PYAN DATE; 9/12/91 SCALE; NONE ,l kenda Na -dn$_ swwn'[ NLn' ApaIda Item 1/r'r;r M'rS:h'✓;•K~'' ..,r,, l8' ASEO . 1•,11', r, , , l '~'i ~i,~r.'• ~~M J _~-^r-T.. _ t/ MAW Lai t, . 1 r 1. pAK~ ORRESTy CR 1:'.:~ • r i' r r,r,r ' ~ ' i,: A i !•w•.+' n _ ~ I I I . S ❑ tY ;loo • I~. r r : fr •,-rt...., .fl., 11 AK R~-- 1 fix •'r,',',r;'/:• r r~ .,r I r`r, 1,r;«P1 {•~1''1~ II A ~ / r . ~ I ~f MIYn'>r NSW' f Nyyr [ r n I, 1 1yy~ ly II 8: ,.,I •4 mot- J " f M M Z J"Py laln SITE~~ ':~';4'e•' ` I r r r r l I 'f y- r"-SII ~ Y r I., + ly • ~ 1 n 51,;:':'I+P ~ t;.}C x.• ~ • ..'r' r'r , y'~ 111;:7;,;1 t.;r~i; ' ' • r r,r:;• • ~ rrr-;r~ ,u~., ,~-7•,1 r ,r,: ,r, l,• 1 ' :V = Irr;l' '~:'LS''': ~;I 'r' I'r:' i~.. 1 r'~ ' e . ,1, • , 1'.:'f,I,~r rVr':'.~I''7~f J•rPl'yetifi"`r'r'r,l . r, I r . . ' •.'r•,1 I;r'..r,~.•'I; 11,1, .•.y., I` r'1,' y r H ~ I . I 1 ; r r . • 1,• Yr ; r•. r; r;.;1 I, , t~l;l ';':r•''•'' ''i'','r;dT :'srrll•: 'lh;r a rtiL • 4'ri ,r .`.,,'r,l, ' ' • '.;1 r'7r'r• `r'1 •••1~.':1,/x,/✓:''•,+rl YV~l PRM. II' /A1Q YAII - I r f ' ATTACHMENT 2 EXHISIT__' SERVICE PLAN Annexation Number.. A-60 Aponda No, _Jk-pD„S Acreage annexed: Apontla Iforr~~,~ ~"A 23.059 Acres ~!o ~-1~- U"tion: North of Ryan Road along Forrestridge Drive. Police Services 1 Patrolling, response to calls services will be provided on the effective dateiof , and other route the annexation, using existing personnel and equipment, 2• Upon ultimate development of the area level of police services will be the same area as are furnished to comparable provided twith,in the city. B. Lire Protect ~on and Fmeraencv Medical services 1• Fire protection and emergency medical services by the present personnel and present equipment, within the limitations of available water and distances from existing fire stations, will be provided to this area on the effective date of the annexation, ' 2. Upon ultimate development of the area,the same level of fire and emergency ambulance services will be provided to this area as are furnished to comparable areas within the city, C. Water/Wastew. atex Ser ices Water and wastewater services will be extended to the property in accordance to the city's master utility plan and Section 34-118 of the Denton Code of ordinances. Developers shall pay the actual ccst of all water and sewer main extensions, lift stations and other necessary facilities required to serve thoir evel in accordance with the City's master ur,ilit plan ment the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. and the i r ' r. kends No. ~O$~ ADeiiaa Hom_ The Cit!, may participate in the cost to oversize two and sewer mains subject to fund availability and approval of t'oa City Council. Whe;-e water or sewer main extensions, lift stations, force mains or other necessary facilities are installed by the developer, the developer shall be entitled to reimbursement of the cost of such facilities from pro- rata charges paid by persons connecting to or using such facilities to serve their property, according to the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. • D. Solid Waste Collection 1. Solid waste collection will be provided to the property at the same level of service as available to comparable areas within the city, within 60 days of the effective date of annexation. 2. As development and construction commence within this property, and population density increases to the proper level, solid waste collection shall be provided to this property in accordance with then current policies of the City as to frequency, charges and so forth. E. Streets and Roads 1. The City of Denton's existing policies with regard to street maintenance, applicable throughout the entire City, shall apply to this property beginning with the effective date of the annexation. 2. Routine maintenance of streets and roads will begin in the annexed area on the effective date of annexation using the standards and level of service as currently applied to comparable areas of the city. 3. Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installation of storm drainage facilities, construction of curb cuts and gutters, and other such major improvements, as the need therefore is determined by the City Council or Manager, will be accomplished under the established policies of the city. 4. Traffic signals, signage and other traffic control devices will be installed as the need therefore is established by appropriate study and traffic 2 t r w ~a to ~V Agenda No. _/~Qd Agenda Ilam_F~ standards, Date e~_l~7_g25. street and road lighting will be installed Tit"'h~ substantially developed areas in accordance with the established policies of the City. l F. Environmental Health and Code Enforcement Services 1. Enforcement of the City's environmental health ordinances and regulations including, but not limited to the grass and weed ordinance, garbage and trash ordinance, junked vehicle ordinance, sign ordinance, food handler ordinance, animal control ordinance, and the tree preservation ordinance shall be provided within this area on the effective " date of the annexation. These ordinances and regulations will be enforced through the use of existing personnel. Buildin " g, plumbing, electrical, gas, and all other construction codes, as may be adopted by the City, will be enforced within this area beginning with the effective date of the annexation. Existing personnel will be used to provide these services. 3. The City's zoning, subdivision and other ordinances shall be enforced in this area beginning on the effective date of the annexation. 4. All inspection services provided by the City of Denton, but not mentioned above, will be provided to this area beginning on the effective date of the annexation. Existing personnel will be used to provide these services. 5. Flood damage mitigation will be provided by existing codes and ordinances of the City as of the effective date of the annexation. 6. As development and construction commence within this area, sufficient personnel will be provided to furnish this area with the same level of environmental health and code enforcement services as are furnished to comparable areas within the city. G. Planning and Development Services The zoning jurisdiction of the City will extend to the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. Single 3 c ~i F family SF-16 zoning district designation is anticipated for this tract. Agenda No..~ Agondaltorn~ 1. Parks and Recreation Services OHIO_ L_-AMf Residents of the newly annexed area may use all recre do facilities, including parks and swimming pools throughout the city, on the effective date of the annexation. The same standards and policies now used within the city will be followed in the maintenance of parks, playgrounds and swimming pools. J. Electrical Distribution Electrical power will be made available to the site as required, at the same level of service currently being, provided to comparable areas within the City. K. Miscellaneous Street names and sign will be installed, if required, approximately six (6) months after the effective date of annexation. Residents of the newly annexed area may use all publicly owned facilities, buildings or services within the city on the effective date of the annexation. All publicly owned facilities, buildings or services will be maintained in accordance with established standards and policies now used in the City. L. ARUt l Improvements Program (CIP) The CIP of the City is prioritized by such policy guidelines as: 1. Demand for services as compared to other areas will be based on characteristics of topography, land utilization, population density, magnitude of problems as related to comparable areas, established technical standards and professional studies. 2. The overall cost-effectiveness of providing a specific facility or service. The annexed area will be considered for CIP improvements in the upcoming CIP plan. The annexation area will be considered according to the same established criteria as all other areas of the City. 4 t 'e r. ! ft li C ITyp COUNCIL Q4ooOO~p0~o4O 00p p~~00O _ ON % o o ` ~P d~ d ~O N F °°°00oQOao c cono°°°oo C i~ t: Q r Apen6a No. Agwida Il0111 / - l2l(9DATEt 02/18/92 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TOi Mayor and Members of the city council FROMr Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY REPLAT OF LOT 1-R, BLOCK 9 OF THE ALEX ROBERTSON ADDITION] FROM LOT 1, .289 ACRES OF JENNETTE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND APPROXIMATELY 3.538 ACRES OF UNPLATTED LAND. RECOMMENDATION: The FFebruPlann12ing and 1992 Zoning ~mcondition d recommended on thefiaroval 5-0 at nal abandonment its Jennette Street, and the showing of an adequate easement on the side of the property. SUMMARY= The 4.082 acre site is located on the northeast corner of Mills street and cross Timber Street, adjacent to the Union Pacific right-of-way. Currently, the site encompasses the Fred Moore Day Care Center and a large brick building which formerly housed a high school. Public Improvements include approximately 960 feet of concrete sidewalk along Mill and Cross Timber, and a fire hydrant next to Mill .Street. BACKGROUNDt The building is proposed to be used by the D.I.S.D. for a school. Currently, the land is zoned for multi-family (MF-1) use in which a public school is allowed by right. Some parking will take place on the A to-be-abandoned portion of Jennette street, which is sometimes called Wye Street. Approximately .289 acres of right-of-way will be considered for abandonment at the March 3, 1992 meeting of the City council. City r telephonerv e i ces lelandectricaflacilities, solidnwaste,~gare water, as The sanitary railroad shown on the drawing is not used. The replat conform to the minimum requirements of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations) Chapter 34 of the code of ordinances. PR RAMS.,DEPARTMENTS OA GROUPS AFFECTED: N/A C 1. A Il 1 City, Council Report Format Acenda No. -IA-40r6, _ Alex Robertson Addition Agenda ltem-X February 18, 1992 E Date FISCAL IMPACTi N/A Re" fully eu m tteds ~U + Prepared by= Lloyd Merrell G all City Manager 0, Owen Yoe , A Urban Planner Appfr F n VHRObbin AICP Exeoutive Dire r Planning and Development AXXOOODA A C V /a I; Al)ondd PJo. __q ~ t~~ y P-92002 Alex Robertson Addition Agma JJon,_, 7 NORTH R _ °I Z 9 i OAKWTEuoti E. PRAIR CE METERY - WARR Q' TT AKWOOD PRAIRI w U W ¢ n W CEMETERY rwi vi J n Y ,Q R ED MOORE PARK L50N.__ _j co s y E 0 zz 2 VIA Z CL J_ ~ ~ ~ w 6 3t LL) LLJ = W j ; CG O u ¢ " < m MORSE IZZZU MILL RUTH L ` Y PARK lN. SITE MC DONA' SI k °w A~ Y o o INCOLN PL f F ~ V Q A SMITH_ a ~ SMi TH o DAUGHERTY Q z - z vi f.GF?E~ VISTA ~c~ SI~ADY OAKS DR, NMAN SANTA-( FF~- w,; LAREOO o- a u ~I CT, L N. LiJ DATE: 2/5192 SCALE: NONE r. P-92-002 Alex Robertson Addition Q~ Agenda Na, _'QQS, Agonda Iloni-_-,,~~__ Dale ___r2;,(ff c' NORTH 1 \ ri~ ? f \Xk ~f , w .~...I' !10tH 1 i ' haeF .e ~ ' ~ I 11 f, /alflrf DV ICOTaw I I I PRELIMINARY REPLAT 3. ~ DATE; 2/16/92 SCALE, NONE n r; ,t Agenda No...L DRAFT Aquil a tton) s ~ Minutes ~ ~1e PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION tit;l2 . February 12, 1992 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas was held on Wednesday, February 12, 1992, at 500 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 215 E. McKinney. Present; Jim Engelbrecht; Ivan Glasscock; Judd Holt; Mary Evelyn Huey; and William Kamman Absent. Roy Appleton III and Fran Morgan Present from Staff. Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning and Development; Karen Feshari, Jrban Planner; Owen Yost, Urban Planner; Joe Morris, # Assistant City Attorney; David Salmon, Engineering; and Olivia Carson, Secretary Chairman Holt called the meeting to order. He announced that the Goldfield zoning case, the Smith and Johnson Street case, and the Myrtle Street zoning case was withdrawn. 1. Minutes It was moved by Mr. Kamman, seconded by Mr. Glasscock, and unanimously carried (4-0) to approve the minutes of the January 8, 1992 regular meeting. Mr. Engelbrecht arrived at the- meeting. II. Consider making a recommendation on the preliminary plat of Lots 1 and 2, Block A of the A. Goldfield Addition. Mr. Yost stated that the applicant has requested that the plat be withdrawn from the agenda. The Development Review Committee has not had an opportunity to make a recommendation. Mr. Robbins said that his understanding was that the applicant wanted to postpone consideration of the plat to another meeting, not to withdraw the plat. Motion was made by Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht, and unanimously carried (5-0). III. Hold a public hearing and consider the preliminary replat of 4.082 acres, being Lot 1-R, Block 9 of the Alex Robertson Addition. Staff Report; Mr. Yost stated that the 4.082 acre site is located on the northeast c x I.' u 11 P&Z Minutes Agenda No. _ "'GbSr 6 t February 12, 1992 D R A T f Page 2 Agenda ~tern_~;5 05' corner of Mill Street and Cross Timber Street, adjacent to the Union Pacific right-of- way which is not being used. The preliminary replat of Lot 1-R9 Block 9 is from Lot 1, .289 acres of Jeanette Street right-of-way, and approximately 3.538 acres of ° unplatted land. Two public improvements include approximately 960 feet of concrete sidewalk along Mill and Cross Timber, and a fire hydrant next to Mill Street. Abandonment of Jeanette Street is to be considered later on tonight's agenda. Jennette Street is sometimes called Wye Street. Petitioner: Jeff Terry, DiSciullo & Terry, stated that his firm is handling the platting for the School District which owns the property. They hope to remodel the existing Fred Moore School building and add some parking. He requested the Commission to act favorably on the replat. No one was present to speak in favor or in opposition to the replat. Recommendation: Mr. Yost stated that the Development Review Committee recommends approval with two conditions. One is that the replat be subject to the approval of the abandonment of Jennette Street and the other is that an adequate easement be provided along the side of the property for existing utilities. Mr. Engelbrecht asked if the end of Jennette Street will be closed off. Mr. Yost said no. Mr. Engelbrecht said that if ingress and egress are permitted at both ends of the street it will still be a public street. Mr. Salmon explained that the preliminary building plans show that the street will be necked down at each end so that it will become more like a drive approach. There will also be a hump in the design so cars will not be able to travel through in a straight shot but there will not be a dead end. There will be two-way circulation but it will be narrow because of parking and there will be a hump to drive around. This will not be used as a short cut because the cars will have to drive too slow. A lot of Jennette Street is on railroad right-of-way and private property, The whole street does not currently belong to the City. The City's portion of the street is proposed to be abandoned. Ms. Huey asked if there would be any traffic hazard. 4 1 E! Agenda Ne. P&Z Minutes npontla nem_.. n L) ORA February 12, 1992 Cote Page 3 Mr. Salmon said that he does not think so. The street will be abandoned for public use so if there is any hazard it will he on private property. If cars do cut through, that is a trespassing issue. Chairman Holt closed the public hearing Mr. Engelbrecht moved to recommend approval of the preliminary replat with conditions. Motion was seconded by Mr. Kamman and carried unanimously (5.0). ✓ IV. Hold a public hearing and consider amending a Specific Use Permit (SUP) for Putt- Putt Golf, Inc., a two acre tract of land on the south side of McKinney Street. Six notices were mailed to property owners within 200'; two were returned in favor and zero in opposition. Staff Report; Ms. Feshari reported that the petition is to amend a Specific Use Permit an Lot 1, Block A, Putt-Putt Golf and Games Addition for the purpose of adding batting cages. The tract is 2 acres located on the south side of McKinney Street near its intersection with Cardinal Street. Surrounding land uses include SF-7 to the north, vacant agricultural land to the south and west, and PD-41 and the Genetic Research Building to the east. The Special Information Section of the staff report is not necessary for the purpose of this report as the proposed use will not effect transportation, drainage, utilities, or fire. On February 21, 1989, the City Council approved Ordinance 89.028 granting a Specific Use Permit for an ovJoor commercial amusement use in the Agricultural Zoning District. In 1982, the property to the east was zoned Planned Development No, 41 for retail, multifamily, single- family attached and detached land uses. Two proposals for creating a Planned Development on 60.2 acres, including this site, were submitted in 1986. The proposals included land uses ranging from general retail to single-family attached. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial of both requests. The property is located in a moderate activity area. The allocated trips for this site are 1,300. The proposed batting cages will not affect the intensity trip allocation. The main concerns of the additional use are noise and lighting. The applicant has proposed a location in the southern portion of the site. The 6 lanes will be on a four inch slab approximately 80' by 100'. An 8' high chain link fence is proposed around the batting area. Netting around the area ranges from 14' in height to 20'. Along the western portion of the batting cage, the site plan depicts 7 light poles approximately 20' high. The lights will be angled down to shine on the area between the batter and the pitching machine. The lights are angled to direct light towards the C f. t~ i! r CITY }-.COUNCIL t 9 i r L r H 1. - r goo°°~~°~anaoooopc~iT ti= c:l p Q 1 1 pp~'~COGLt~~~° ~ ~ 11 Iy 1 1-1 LLy.~1 11.. L .-1 1 a 1' ` J 1- L_ 1 4 ♦1'~ ~ly } 1 . h r 1i f CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT MandaNo. 'OD$' TO, Mayor and Members of the City CouncilAp61daItaw FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager Daly ?r1& ";,/7^r]` 7 SUBJECT: App=oval of a tax refund to First State 13ank of Denton RECOMMENDATION: The Tax Department has mailed an Application for Refund to the t-xpayer, All completed forms and necessary documentation have eon returned, requesting this refund, which the Tax Technician SUiMh~XOT ads. Chapter 31,11 of the Texas Property max Code requires the approval of ,00 the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $ 500,00, first State Bank of Denton has requesttO a refund in the amount; of 1 5g5 29 because they paid Account 113598 twice, PAGKG~OUND: Fjrst State Bank made a payment of g 1,585,29 on November 13, 1991. and again on January-28, 1992, This resulted in in overpayment of $ 1,585.29. A tax refund is due, PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: The Tax Department and the tax account of 1PIrst State Bank of Denton FISCAL IMPACT: $ 1,585,29 RESP FULLY S B tITTED: L Y larre City Manager Prepared by: ame V ,9c II c er Title Tax Technician Approved: me ar a fers11 Title T per 2633C/3 4 /f z; Slate Property Tax Board APPLICATION FOR TAX REFU tdafV?~'ODS Rotund Application 31.11(4!12) o. Agenda llem Collecting Office Name; Date -49; -ftz=. Collecting Tax For: I ax ng nits) Address City, State, Zip Code In order to apply for a tax refund, the following information must be provided by the taxpayer, IDENTIFICA3JON OF PROPERTY OWYER: Name; leST7-R7 f1Al~ lTrra,y } Address; SQ% / e), root Tx W, z0z -o 10 Telephone Number (If additional lnlormatton Is needed): IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: Description of Property: _o?d` C,f"T t= ~z oc is / G07- / Or) i Address or Location of Property, o P ~2b Account Number of Property: -a or Tax Recelpt Number: _ INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES: Name of Taxing Unit Year for Amount of From Which Refund Which Refund Date of the Amount of Tax Refund Is Requested Is Requested Tax Payment Taxes Paid Requested 1,errvox t7UT6Al 19 11 ~ / 19 9/ $ _ 151951 ;z.9 $ 2. Ci ry or- 2)£W7 C d 19 L 02 1 19 $ /•5 SS, a L q _ $ 4"S`r ~ 3. 19 _ / 19 $ $ Taxpayer's reason for refund (attach supporting documentation); X1257- ~T/ATE -ZA-4)K ?~V L D r>y/.S 7AX TuJlc~ /N ~Q,earc ~ufy' Alf ~f~~lf5r~n~y !1 ~fFi~,U~ D ✓e e Z,,~ LL4 6 Al i LA IAN~c rk 2 X H 1,1,7d-, "I hereby apply for the refund of the above-described taxes and certify that the Information I have given on this form is true and correct," -496i~ f '54-z~ Bd«/t- X--L2_( ,l'!t Q~ &FLA •--+J ~~J'f.R7Ly„J, .zL7Z - olefin r a{, Signature Date of Application for Tax Refund OEYERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND: Approval Disapproval Signature of Authorized Officer Date Signature of Presiding Officer(s) of Taxing Date Unit(s) for refund applications over $500 Any parson who makse a false entry upon the foregoing record shall be sublaot loons of the foll~erinq ponatkes; i, Impdsonmant of not more than 10 years not lass than 2 years and/or a Ana of not mots than 58,000 or both such dna and Imprisonment; 2. confinement In )ail for a term up to 1 year or a One not to exce" $2,000 or both ouch One and imprlsonmenf as set forth In Section 37,10, Panel Coda, REFUND. 3111 C t r ti i Agenda No. Agenda Itont _ t Gila_ _ EHDORSE HERE m c\j PINY TO THE OUR -OF 00 Im 11 CITY OF QENTOK TEXAS + t'•• 0 DO NOT WRITE, STAMP OR SION BIELOW THIS LINE ti} R E S E A V E0 FOR FINANCIAL INST TUYION USE• .A !tom ysF~ •'i. c i F~+' i N l O 1 W' 0 I jtT tsTA?P. rAflj( W h0! 21 3T C c .r JX .,~1H J. 1 f Ell t-08 tyf j...,L'1. JI I ~i f 1~ r ~1l I ~y ! N r'j,~ , C H. M I 4 ~ .a I1f O Iy~ 1141, 29 Q I a tlk. F4 4x. rm Ci. ...II 7i r r~. 0 f W o W C • ' } I- L0+ W a °0 •FEDERAL A0.11t Vu BOARD OF OOVERNORS REO, CC I! - f C Z A~ f M 0. K w nY 0 n s ~.j.,4:.r Ef:'~f. i~;a ~'i«?{»•i~lt= I'I~F+'~ ,G. . I,.I °T, fn ~ IV d:~ r -r ~n► t9 dV 1,3 o_ { a :;r j P" i t.. H cr% 51( 2-4 a I Gl m y f ~ . ~ m a FOOTErATINANK 13382 r 13 3;12 k PAY r AA"N f TO THE ' DATE ONDER OF rITY OF DrNTON TAX OFFTCF.. 1117f, 002253 1/24/92 b{+{`;"}.t 17F446.34 215 Es MCK 1 NNEY f r ` FXPF fACCOUNI DE: NT ON TX li ;v 76201-000G 11'0133821i' 1:IIL911,71,b: e'00 3011, ail{' 1'000 3741,634o' z y, ORE PROPERTIES - 1991 TAXES CITY OF DENTON A{~ellaa No ~,20DS _ VRME i3' i l' DESCRIPTION -~bfld' Ito UASB , r it-TY °fRST STATE BANK BELLAIRE HGTS tll-BLK 3 LOT 5 3294 49.76 -IRST STATE BANK BELLAIRE HOTS III-BLK 2 LOT 7 / ft103PB3 98.20 'IRST STATE BANK .506 AIL - 8118338 181.20 - PIRST STATE BANK 3730 E MCKiNNEY - DENTON R107330 4,446.43 FIRST STATE BANK LT 1 ELK 1 - DENTON R94337 _ 446.64 FIRST STATE BANK LT? ELK 1 - DE•NTON 8114874 449.03 FIRST STATE BANK 1.9itJ AIL SHADY OAKS 8, WOODRO' 7 _ 8108981 575.71 FIRST STATE BANK _ QSfi ` Z FIRST STATE BANK I-35W BUSINESS PARK - DENTON 8130072 5,374.40 FIRST STATE BANK .127 AIL LILLIAN MILLER & 1-35 R118264 162.97 FiRST STATE BANK 5.2364 Al 1-35E - DENTON 830809 1,575.07 FIRST STATE BANK 1.795AILTLLIANMILLER _ 839257 59821 FIRST STATE BANK 10.087 AIL MAYHILL no. R33072 _ 348.00 1FIRST STATEEBANK 4.05 NL 3100 FT. WORTH DR. - DENTON_ 839217 _ 1,487.47 FIRST STATE BANK 3.68 All. LOOP 288 - DENTON 835509 i 1 167.3B FRST STATE BANK 3.68 AIL LOOP 288 - DENTON 8133598 1,585,29 B2 ,766.54 IFIRST STATE BANK LT 5 MACK CENTER - DENTON _ N107320 _ 326.40 FIRST STATE BANK LT 4 MACK CENTER - DENTON A$07319 245.73 FIRST STATE BANK LT 11 R ELK S, ANNA & SUNSET - DENTON F1121663 444.41 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS BLK A LT I - OENTON 8120874' 82.21 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA- MEADBt S BLK A LT 3 - DENTON 8120976 82,21 - - - FIR3T STATE BANK _ AUDRA MEADOWS BLK A LT 5 - DENTON 8120978 82.21 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS ELK A LT I 1 - DENTON _ 8120904 - 82,21 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRAMEADOWS ELK A LT 18 - DENTON 8120991 82,21 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS BILK A LT 20 - DENTON R120993 82.21 FIRST STATE BANK AVORA MEADOWS BILK A LT 21 - DENTON 8120994_ 86.91 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS BLK A LT 22 - DENTON 8120995 _ _ 95.43 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS BILK A LT 26 - DENTON 8120999 62.21 FIRST STATE BANK _ AUDRA MEADOWS ELK A LT 27 - DENTON 8159293 104.32 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS ELK A LT 28 - DENTON 8159294 89,72 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS ELK A LT 29 - DENTON 8169295 _ _84.40_ FIRST STATE BANK _ AUDRA MEADOWS BLK A LT 30 - DENTON 8159290 _ 84.40 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS ELK A LT 31: • DENTON _ 8159297 84.40 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS BILK A LT 327- DEN TON____ R55929B 84.40 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS BILK A LT 33 - DENTON _ 8169299 84.40 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS BILK A LT 34 - DENTON 8169300 - 84.40 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS BILK A LT 35 - DEN'fON 8169301 _ 84.40 FIRST STATE (TANK AUDRA MEADOWS ELK A Ui 38 - DETON 8159302 _ 84,40 FIRST STATE SANK AUDRA MEADOWS ELK A LT 37 - DENTON 8159303 91.97 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS ELK A LT 38 - DENTON _ 8159304 _ 84,40 1:1AST-SSTATE0ANK AUDRA MEADOWS BLK A L2 39 - DENTON 8159305 _ 04,40 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS ELK A LT 40 - DENTON 8159308 84,40 FIRST STATE 8ANK - AUDRA MEADOWS BLK A LT 41 - DENTON 8159307 _ 84,40 FIRST 6TATE 8ANK AUDRA MEADOWS BLK A LT 43 DENTON 8159309 84.40 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS BILK A LT 44 - DEN'fON 8169310 84,40 FIRST STATE BANK _ AUDRA MEADOWS BLK A LT 45 - DENTON - R159311 84,40 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS BLK A LT 46 - DENTON - 8169312 _ 84,40 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS BLK A LT 47 - DENTON 8159313 - 87.43 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS BLK B LT 6 - DENTON 8121006 82.21 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS OLK 8 LT 7 - DENTON - 8121007 82.21 F'RST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS ELK 6 LT 8 - NTON8121008 82.21 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS BLK B LT 1 I - D DENTON 8121011 _ 82,21 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS BLK B LT 12 - DENTON i_ 8121012 82.21 r FIRST STATE BANK- AUDRA MEADOWS BLK 6 LT 13 - DENTON R121013~_ _ 82.21 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS BLK B LT 17 - DETON 8121019 _ 82,21 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS ELK 0 LT 18 - DENT014 8121020- 02.21 FIRST STATE BANK _ AUDRA MEADOWS ELK 8 LT 21 - DEKTON 8121023 82.21 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS BLK B LT 24 - OENTON T 8121020 82.21 FIRST STATE BANK _ AUDRA MEADOWS ELK 8 LT 25 - DENTON 8121027 82,21 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS ELK B LT 26 - DENTON R121028 82.21 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS BLK B LT 27 DENTON _ 8121029 82.21 FIRST STATE BANK - AUDRA MEADOWS BLK B L1 29 - DENTON__ 8221031 82.21 FIRST STATE BANK AUDRA MEADOWS ELK BLT 34 - DENTOI R121036y 8221 c FIRST STATE BANK - 1909 VIRGINIA ST - DENTON - R77960 - 441,10 FIRST STATE BANK .425 AIL SHADY OAKS - DENTON _ 8134311 190,25 FIRST STATE BANK T _J _ - _ 7 1 ORE PROPERTIES - 1991 TAXES CITY OFDENTON_ _ -E~danda~la2? ~'--~T DESCRIPTION - NUMBER'' CITY I NAME ;r 1027FaL ~ 95.50 rti FIRST STATE BANK A E. HAMPTON - DENTOW 7 62.21 1BP80r FIRST STATE BANK l[T--i0TTfA`M-?TdN 3 E. HAMPTON - DENTON }i102758. 85.fi0 - NTON 82.21 FIRST STATE BANK 6 E. HAh1PTON DE FIRST STATE BAWfi R102762 02.21 FIRDT STATE BANK 8 E. HAMPTON - DEN70N 8102764 87.20 IRST STATE SANK - DEXTON 834495 97,62 FIRST STATE BANK 1.59 AIL LOOP 288 - D£WT3N 896356 860.06 - - 1.28 :FIRST STATE BANK- 1.59 :AIL-LOOP 288 - DENTON 8104362 54 ' FIRST STATE BANK v J V.S. AD D9 LT 2 BLVD - DENTON 878271 409 66 FIRST STATE BANK 2.30f AIL - - - 827047 1,018.77 7049 ---~56.90 FIRST STATE BANK-- 2301 AIL - 82 FIRST STATE BANK 2.301 All 1,153,68 FIRST STATE BANK - 2,258 AIL LOOP 288 & SPENCER RD. 8111189 - 89 92 SINGLE FAMILY BLK i LT 1 -DENTON m047615 0m047615 - FIRST STATE BANK 8104790 125.69 FIRST STATE BANK - SINSLE FAMILYBLK 2 LT 1 - DENTON - 105.72 ° FIRST STATE BANK SlN^uLE FAMILYY 6LK 2 LT 3 - DENTON --810470- 89.77 RI04794 FIRST STATE BANK SINGLE FAMILY BLK 2 LT 4 - DEN70N Rf05014 104.21 FIRST STATE BANK SINGLE FAMILY BLK 2 LT 12 - DENTON p105022-- tOt.47 FIRST STATE BANK SINGLE FAMILY BLK 2 LT 13 - DENTON A1050O X01.47 FIRST STATE BANK SWGLE FAMILY BLK 2 LT 14 - DEN 70K --95 89 FVRS7 STATE 2AKK SINGLE FAMILY BLK 2 LT 15 - DEN ON f 8105028 - FIR 97 03 ST STATE BANK SINGLE FAMILY al.V<2 LT 18 ---D- H1p5030 _ -~94 98 FIRST STATE BANK _ SINGLE FAMILY BLK 2 L7 17 - DENT ON 105034 97.31 FIRST STAT3 BANK SINGLE FMR Y BLK 2 LT 18 - DENTON 1 79,fi8 FIRST STATE BANK DUPLEX L OT - BLK 1 LT 1 A - DENTON 104958 8104990 - 43.16 DUPLEX LOT ---6 -LK 1 LT 1 B - DENTON - FIRST STATE BANK - - RI04961 43,39 FIRST STA'f D BANK DUPLEX LOT -BLK 1 LT 2A - DENTON H1049S2 64.15 FIRST STATE BANK DUPLEX LOT - BLK 1 LT 2B - DENTON 104907 y 66,17 FIRST STATE BANK DUPLEX LOT - BLK 1 LT QA - DENTON 1 `qt -85 FIRST STATE BANK _ DUPLEX LOT -BLK 1 TT 4B - DENTON 8104969 41.65 FIRST STATE BANK DUPLEX LOT -BLK 1 LT 7A - DNTON --41,10 FIRST 87ATE ONNK DUPLEX LOT - BLK 1 L7 76 - DETlTON 8104978 85.41 FIRST STATE BANK DUPLEX LOT - BLK 2 LT IA - DENTON - - R104980 -43,08 FIRST STATE 13A DUPLE X LOT-BLK24T18-DEN70N - 8104981 W 43,6 FIRST STATE DANK DUPLEX LOT BLK 2 LT 2A --DENTON - R104982 8194984 43.06 FIRST STATE BANK__ DUPLEX LOT -BLK2 L7 2B - DENTOW 43 FIRST STATE BANK D PLEX LOTF- BLK -2 LT 3A - DENTON 8104988_ - 43,06 FI1S .06 DUPLEX LOT-- BLK 22 LT 38 - ENTON H104986 T STATE BANK _ 8103333' FIHS7 STATE BANK DUPLEX LOT - BLK2L7 AA - OENTON 43.05 - DUPLEXLOT-BLK2LT49-DENTON R104991 FIRST STATE BANK B _ _104992 47.50 OENTO DUPLEXLOT-BLK2LT5A-N FIRST STATE ANK--_ gg3 _ 78.90 FIRST STATE BANK OUPLEX LOT -BLK 2 t T 68_- 9ENTON 810g104993 - 67.31 FIRST STATE BANK DUPLEX LOT - BLK 2 L" A - DENON_ - 37.62 FIRST STATE BANK - DUPLEX LOT - BLK -2 LT 8E'-- DENTON R104998 3F6-2 , PIRS7 STATE BANK - DUPLEX LOT -BLK 2 L7 7A - ENTON - 8104999 d&.46 47 FIRST STATE BANK DUPLEX LOT - BLK 2 LT 7B= D_ENTON H10S000 - - 35,73 FIfi3T STATE BANK _ DUPLEX LOT - DLK TL f I IA - DENTON 8105007 3007 - FIRST STATE BANK - DUPLEX LO7 -BLK 2 LT 119 - DENTUN 81 --31637 - 54.63 FIRST STATE BANK 7,227 AIL KINGS ROW & LOOP 268 H36980 191'46 FIRST STATE BANK 1,749 AJL HWY 380 204-- -"-35,04 SEC 204 FIRST STATE BANK SOLARWAY ADU~ L7 7 H39 FIRST STATE BANK _ _ SOLAIWAY AODN - LTSB SEC 1 R39205 96195 - 51 98,79 FIRST STATE -BANK SOLARWAY ADDN - LT 1% S -62 - 8825 _2 PI9STSTATE -SANK SOLAHIJAY ADDN - LT 18 SEC 2 882555 90.0 R6gt 70.37 _HWAYA3DW - LT 22 SEC 2 882562 FIRST STATE BANK _ SOIJ+ ! FIRST STATE BANK SOLARWAY ADDN - LT 23 SEC 2 - - 84,02 ----AR-WAY-ADDN-- - L----T-24-- 2 - 862563 98,88 _ SOL ,W 2 FIRST STA TEDANK FIPST 1122988 3.23 S'fA7LBAWK - 21,741 Af22988- 164.42 FIRST STATE BANK 2$.741 9736W f4 49 _ 0.61 8113166 _ _ FIRST STATE BANK 21.70 1 AIL-I--5-5WR 60 837097 _ ~1 18305 FIRST STATE BBANK _ 174.918 AIL I-05W 19 & 35 & 12,0 A1LL_--~ 137824 _ ,84 FIRST STATE BANK _ 174.918 AIL 1-35W TS 120 8 AIL} - 860799 - 12.64 FIRST STATE BANK _ _ 64.198 AIL NWY 300 ~KRUM ISD) 121 FIRST STATE 13ANK- - 64.108,W- HW' 380( IA UISO H75917 0.72 -----1 75 _ - HEd358 FIR57 STATE BANK 3f,322 NL fHWY 330 9,'12 ` 875915 - FIRST STATE BANK Y _ 31.322 AIL 1iWY 360(1<1UM ISO) R76l87-!_ 661,18 FIRST STATE BANK DOUDLE EAeI E ADDN - I.T 1 BLK 1 _ - - Y. q it i i ORE PROPERTIES - 1991 TAXES CITY OF RENTON jj~~ yy~~ ,,SS~ i~' 3R~~ ~ 1 r~. y 'i~:~.. J 1~ 1•f~M~~flkW15?i.•97~~,:k~i ~~•4~Ii.• . VXWO ~i", , ° T •R SOdIPT10 A1688S8 39,38 AST STATE BANK - LT 1 BLKA WILSON ST - DSNTON TOTALS r- 3 7,60 Z,Q~ ~ 15'x, Agenda No, _ Agenda ROM 37, qq4, 3 a` Date lfdfo-p-~`- 'I 00 , 1 i t REPORT F10R05DK 02/04/92 AT 18741 O V 'E R P A Y M E N T S PACE 0 ACCOUNT NO. PECEIPT N0. NAME ADDRESS AMOUNT STATUS OF PAYMENT 02946400000 91/04/10-0357 STEINEL. MICHAEL I. RCCKWGCD LM ♦66.6J OVERPAY 14572000000 91/04/10-0361 KLAUSING. JAMES C GRANT PKWY 124.47 CVERPAY 12053800000 91/04/15-0132 KENNEY. LARRY G FORRESIRIDGE 0 0.06 OVERPAY 03106160000 91004/15-0134 CASTLEBERRY• SILLY -F . - magav 03042200000 91/04/15-0229 NEWTON. CLARA ESTATE 60LIVAP ST >f ltr♦0 Ova,RPAV 10423360000 91104/16-0093 AOKISON• JUDITH A PAPNSIOE DR 34.26 OVERPAY 02617600000 91/04/17-0027 SIMS• MARTHA 1 SARAH BRONSTAD MALONE ST 034030 OVERPAY 16143600000 91/04117-0068 PALMER, SHERRY WWPAV 90670600000 91/04/21-00^4 G E MEDICAL SYSTEMS 1-35 80635.20 CVERPAY 90279200000 91/04/2,3-0181 THE VILLAGE LAUNDRY W UNIVERSITY D 29.96 CVERPAY 90761500000 91/04/24-0026 BANC IRELAND/FIRST FINANCIAL S 1-35E/G T NA 11.09 CVERPAY 03307000000 91/04/24-0065 GRAY. ETHOL WOO00 -_-------OUNCAN-ii---- --------IO++Ol-Lva"AV 91029000060 9124/24-012 9 FRIDEN ALCATEL 9 139 CORINTH TX 24 .00 OVERPAV 02402000000 914/24-0159 GREGORY. ARTHUR F III WESTWAV SY 0.13 OVERPAY 02927600000 91/04/27-0177 AMBUENL• STEVEN 0 N BELL AVE 390./1 OVERPAY 13733900000 91/04/27-9277 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF NORTH -TEXAS _._._--0• l-CW11X"S,----------.- 14609000000 91104/21-0294 HANSENs YVONNE F TARTAN CIA 32076 CVERPAY coo 10040's 0"4 SM4TJd.Jd.RY L ro•ers ►r cr 214.07 rWEesav 13339800000 91/04/28-0015. FIRSL,STATE BANK DF DENTON ROB t•585.29 CVERPAY i. We*" K 020605 oppp 0 91/04/31-0690 CHISM• JOE A BERNARD IT •7 AY 02164516000 91/04/31-0757 WRIGHT, EDWIN E JA BERNARD T 0.10 CVERPAY 03934400000 91/05103-0073 GREATER SOUTHWEST PROPERTIES TEASLEY LM 0.40 OVERPAY It 361309000 91/06/03-0112 AUSTIk GOGA-COLA. BOTTLING GO -.._.___..--_..0.•OOJiWBRRAV 03224000000 91 A 5/01-0117 BURROUGHS. MARK A SKYLARK OR 2.72 OVERPAY 02336700000 91/05/03-0162 LUKEN• WILLIAM ALLEN PIPING ROCK LN 32.75 40VFRPAY 02853200000 91005103-0272 ST ANDREWS CHURCH 000 CHRIST MADDOX ST 19.02 OVERPAY 90072009000 91 /06/04-0012 F 9RST GIBAALTAR SANK FSS _.._...____._;.1:352 DOl•14__4YlRR1Y 9006 7100000 91/05/04-0013 FIRST GIBRALTAR BANK FSB W UNIVERSITY O 204060 OvtRRAY 03051000000 91/05/04-0136 HUGHES. ELBERT L• BOLIV R ST 0104 OVERPAY 1107!900000 91/05/04-0164 SOUTHWEST FED SAVINGS EVERS PKWY 300101 OVERPAY 14752900000 91/06/04-9t93 AUGVILAA. GLENN f JAOOKLA" W.____._._____. 14753100000 91/05/04-0194 LIU, CALEB C K BAGOXLAKE W 94.40 OVERPAY 14755600000 91 /05/04 -0195 BAHAMCNP ROMULO 9ROOKLAKE W 950•:! CVERPAY 14736000000 91/05/04-0196 tRVING. STEPHEN S WESTVIEW TR 609.90 CVERPAY 11761200000 91/05/94-0197 OTIONG-ONASEK Is 14 O SAL ING It071200000 91/05/04-0218 MCCLAINi JUDITH A ASHCROFT LN 309.79 OVIRPAV 02705000000 91/05/04-0304 DENTON NORTH LTD FALLNEADOW CT 6.212.93 OVRPAY 12216000000 91/05/04-0446 DEPOSIT INS BRIDGE BANK N A 14264966 CVERPAY TOTAL OF G4ERPAYMENTS 56.256.46 a Y ro Q V - \,1 1 l i 1 "H411 H CITY COUNCIL III - mm-mmmmm p~~~ooDDO ~ooO0~QQ OF L ~ 4 q O OCOO ti r ° + v e O- ~~~QOOCGGGQQQ~'~0 C L_ Fr=- ti s i ,q CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Agenda No. TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council ABnnaaltam-1 !=~2 FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager 'a SUBJECT: Approval of a tax refund to United Title Company RECOMMENDATION: The Tax Department has mailed an Appl,..cation for Refund to the taxpayer. All completed forms and necessary documentation have been returned, requesting this refund, which the Tax Technician recommends. SUMMARY: Chapter 31.11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $ 500.00. United Title Company has requested a refund in the amount of $ 508.57 because they overpaid Jana Kizer's account # 029980, BACKGROUND: United Title Company made a payment of $ 508,57 on December 2, 1991 and Lomas Mortgage Company made-, a payment of $ 508.57 on December 31, 1991, This resulted in an overpayment in the taxes. A tax refund is due, PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: The Tax Department and the tax account of Jana Kizer FISCAL IMPACT: $ 508,57 4 RFSP- FULLY SU MITTED: Li y arrell City Manager Prepared by: ame Vic Schneider Title Tax Technician Approved: l ame Ua.r fferson Title 1'r user 2633C/3 ~V i; i sat. Propwly tax eo.rd APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND Re"d Appduftm 31.11(1/12) " Agenda No. C, 04,5 Collecting Office Name; Agontla It Collecting Tax For: , (ax ng Units) Address • 7 City, State, Zip Code ♦rrrr In order to apply for a tax refund, the following Information must be provided by the taxpayer, IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNER; Name: ~J A A).4 C- 1( 17 P R ~ Address: 4-2-0 1 5j,ef t',u -CC 1 A /L ~ 7D9,4jTo f 7`x 76 iev r Telephone Number (if additional Information Is needed): IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY- Description Description of Property: Wale r'Af- uNlVF.2.3 OL--Ve, < h< 7- Address or Locatlon of Property: Fu B 2 ,A- /Z -Df U7'o,r.,t Tr 7~ 20 , Account Number of Property: X44780 or Tax Recelpt Number. INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES: Name of Taxing Unit Year for Amount of From Which Refund Which Refund Date of the Amount of Tax Refund Is Requested Is Requested Tax Payment Taxes Paid Requested S $ 5U 9,5 7 1.C /TV of Z~Eti rco 19 1 / 19 g56 9', r 2t, 1, Y of Df1uToo 19 ill 1_ J 19 11 $ 'rQ fl. S7 S 3. _ 19 / 19- $ $ Taxpayer's reason for refund (attach supporting documentation): -Dec PL-r cA -rF- 7"%i r/iNe,uT dam" /Xe> M P /k) ere le 2. Z1,0 l7 "f > 7 1 r4. l_'y m. ti? Y /5 c2 /QfFcc,ua "I hereby apply for the refund of the abovedeserlbed taxes and certify that the Information I have given on this form Is true and o4ict." n d Q 9 4, 1~17 Sign tear 2_/,to/;Y Barn Application for Tax Refund _-r-_- DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND: Approval Disapproval Signature of Authorized Officer Date Signature of Presiding Officer(s) of Taxing Dale Unit(s) for refund applications over $600 Any person who makes a tals..Mry upon the foregoing record shelf be sub)eet to one of the foltowlog penstftes; 1. Imprisonment of not more than 10 years nor fees than 2 years and/or a Rne at not more then 0,000 or both such fine and mprlsonment; 2. confinement In loll for a term up to 1 year or s fins not to exceed 112,000 or both such One and imprisonment to set forth In Section 31,10, Penal Code, REFU40 )ill w 1 r. Ai l Agonda No. Adonda Item dL4&z 8.nk ~ 01 TSxInSS, to H,A, UNITED TITLE COMPANY o f T + pair x s m l 40 CSCROW ACCOUNT P.Q, IF/6 WALNUT HILL LANE ~ l plllal T ox" ,ua,.srp H.,.s 1516 IRVINQ, TEXAS ?&Me PHONE: (214) 650.66E6 131lG1 1 PAY Tyr cJt', 4.,77' n Trtr f "/t;v. `\r r C ','Y OF :,E? VcN 'AX -r-t-, SCTM P127/41 Zf 8.557 TO vo ♦ h so DAYS THE ORQER QF# 7, ( , +'00 5 i 61+' i i L000 7 9 51: 11, 14 Vnp 3 1 5 5 3 5w' 4000000 SOB S 700 .r . C h wr:.•_-, is ti 4 ` V ~R ~LL r T DE 4f 04 I i1 i ~ w i r - I 1 REPORT F10R050W 02/04/92 AT 10141 O V E R P A Y M E N 7 5 _ PAGI -4 ACCOUNT NO, RECEIPT NO. MANE ADDRESS AMOUNT STATUS Of PAYMENT 1 03080200000 9 /03/31-0446 FRANKLINo WILLIAM N CORONADO DR 4:26 CYERpAY 03691100000 003/31-0592 BELEWr WANDA J BERNARD ST 00 CVERPAY 02449600000 91/03/31-0732 000R1ENr DOROTHY G 03400700000 91/0-3/31-0871 BAILEY. LARRY L. E-_.BOLIVRT AR..57IA 235982 CVERPAY ._-92.61•. CVERPAY_.-_~____..._. 02131500000 9l/04/02-0535 HAMILTON. JAMES A JR 06109200000 91/04/03-0062 GARB. HALTER MD WELLINGTON OR 404.04 CYERpAY 03634400000 91/04/03-0323 IRLASr JOSE G 1-25 A /145 2.17 OVERPAY -11072400000-9{/04/03-0346 CARSTARPHEN.META -G BERNARD ST 0.10 OVERPAY 03569000000 91/04/03-0529 MCGREGOR, JOEL - - - EVERB .ST SY _.._.__,744.36--CVERPAY...__..._._.._.__.___ 03007300000 91/04/06-0144 BRAOY. HENDERSON WILLIE S LOCUST ST 24.26 OVERPAY 03416500600 91/04/06-0220 ATKINS• T H 6 M L JEFFRIES JU hO LN 23.20 OVERPAY 0904 3499500000..91/04/06-0270 SLY* P04ER B. _ FRY-ST 1 9S OVERPAY ' 31322p00p0 91/04/07-0202 ORCHANIAN• KEVORK M - ------.54I.95-CVERPAY 02749800000 91/04,107-0321 HAMILTCNr JACK M VALLEY VIEW Rtl 34.25 OVERPAY 2616400000 91/04/07-0394 MCDUNALUr STEVE T RIDGECREST CIA 34.20 OVERPAY 83231100040 91104/07-0397 CUNNINGHAM._FRANKLIN W N LOCUST 6T 0.03 OVERPAY INX CAMEL .IA St N -_---0.20.-0VEPPAV .02274700000 9l /04/07-0475 REYE S• CA TARING B 13244400000 91.004/07-0549 RIDENr KEITH L CAMELLIA 57 34.2E OVERPAY 10470000COO 91/04/08-0147 FOLSEr MICHAEL L CARRIAGE HILL 0.01 OVERPAY .,7,,.- 196000000..91/04/08-0154 KEALERr_11SA N BRANDY WINE 3462E OVERPAY 446800000 91/04/08-0490 PLATY. ROSE MARIE N EC TOM WOOD ST _ .-.----_.__211 • 1--8YERP 03150000000 91/04/06-0569 JUSTUS• DONALD BILL SUN VALL9TEY •90 OVERPAY 42252000000 91/0 4/09-0038 GINNINGS• J L DR 294.90 OVERPAY 0!130440000-91104/04-0096 NUGENT•-J L SHERATON RD 90049 OVERPAY 11647500000 91/04/09-0713 KILLE• WALLACE E - - - BROKKENBOOEN BOLM-._ ..._.34.00--OVERPAY--------_._ 11761400000 91/04/09-0743 SMITHERSr GREGORY P BRW Si 34.2E OVERPAY t t1764200000 91/04/09-0756 BLACKI JAMES A SR CRESTMEADOW $T 34.2E OVERPAY , f 000200000.91/04/09-0879 FRANKLINr WILLIAM N CADQW ST 34.25 OVERPAY 9114/09 091 SPRASARY• E GAYLE --CORONADRUNA00--OR-- ERPAY--- 600200 TYLER ST R7 -A OVERPAY Yi00 yyniyY 0 91/04/09-0980 K12ER MfI'Y nev rr 1 1495000 &ANBA . DA C GREENBRIAR ST 506457 CVERPAY ~02350100000 91/04/10-0161 EMERSCNr RICHARD D - - - 03192300000 91/04/10-0185 SCHAFER. ANTHCNY 13 Lftu CT 499.04 OVERPAY LA PALCMA OR 0.01 CVERPAY 03365600000 91/4/10-0186 FANKEYr JOHN D L ALICE A BDLIV ST 0.01 OVERPAY 00404000 91/004/10-0195 FRADY• VELNA __EMEAY S ST. 044000000 91/04/10-0146 SEAY. JOHN q ii. 206710 0 91/04/10-0199 SCHUELER. PAUL E Ti TAN TR 0001 OVERPAY !130600000 91/04/10-0200 GARNER. JAMES BEALL W HICKORY ST 0.01 OVERPAY 0401700000 91/04/t0-0202 NELSON. CHRIS M WESSEX CT 0.01 OVERPAY 11496900000 91/04/10-0204 GUTHRIE, JANICE L E ROYAL- WINDSOR SWS -..._.__0.01--CVERPAY 02097100000 91/04/10-0209 YARRINGTONr MICHAEL K NE CI ST 0.01 CVERPAY 03083600000 91/04/10-0210 SUFFRONr PAUL R MISTYWCOD R 0.01 CVERPAY te280000o 41/04/10-0211 PITTMANr CHARLES R GREEN LN 0.01 CVERPAY 365300000 91/06/10-0212 GAZEBO APTS LTD --OL BLVD .01-OVERPAY 5765600000 91/04/10-0213 GAZEBO APTS LTD S 5 CAapCARRCLCL1 BLVD 8 BLD 0.01 OVERPAY 3936300000 91/04/10-0219 IRW1Nr DALE .01 OVERPAY 1-X41196400000 91/04/10-0225 PHIPPS, MARK C EAGLE DR .O1 OVERPAY 03092500000 91/04/10-0229 LOTT@ JOHN R 64e6 .OVERPAY 00629000000 91/04/10-0230 STANRETT. ROBERT W BRADLEY ST 6.66 OVERPAY 03239300000 91/04/10-0231 REED, STANLEY PAISLEY $T 0.01 CVERPAY ;10426000000 91/0 4/10-0349 DAVE. AJ17 BLUEBIRD CIA 0.03 OVERPAY Ib 4r' PARKStOE_DR-. __..-----~?-m--c6 iT I. e A YA a.. CITY COUNCIL ~Op000oco o~ e~~oOOOO~ o r o e 60oOO _ a - vanOO~d T 0 N S 6 ooO~~~Q~t~id~GGO l 4 'r. { [Y x i CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Agenaa No. TO: Mayor and Members of the City CouncilAgendallem_. ABA Dale FROM., Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager J~~• SUBJECT: Approval of a tax refund to Wise County Title RECOMMENDATION: e ax apartment ha;, mailed an Application for Refund to the taxpayer. All completed forms and necessary documentation have begin returned, request'_ng this refund, which the Tax Technician recommends, SUMMARY: iap•er 31.11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of % 500,00. Wise County Title has requested a refund in the amount of $ 614.01 because they overpaid the taxes on Acct. # 030802 in error. BACKGROUND, OL on December 31 1991 Wise County Title made a payment of $61.4, , and' the taxpayers mortgage company also paid $ 61.4.01 on December 31, 1991. This resulted in an overpayment of $614.01, A tax refund is duo. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED; The Tax Department an the tax account of William N. Franklin FISCAL IMPACT; $ 614.01 wy FUY SUBITTEla vrrel City Manager , Prepared by: Name Vic Schneider Title Tax Technician Approved, ame Ilar . J . arson Title T urer 2633C/3 C t. Refund ApFft pgluban gen 31,11(6/e2) S4 Pl 0."`d APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND Agonda No. ' Collecting Office Name y`~---•-.- Collecting Tax For: Aponda lfam`~~ ~-~Z D1 NT r ( axing Units) / Address - Y City, State, zip code _ In order to apply fora _ _ _ tax refund, the following lnformallon must be Provided by the taxpayer, _ _ _ _ - _ » IDENTIFICATION PROPERT OWNER: Name: ' Zo Address; , Telephone Number (If additional information is needed): IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: Description of Property: Lo c- Address or Location of Property: Account Number of Property t 8~2 - or tax, Receipt Number, INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES: Name of Taxing Unlt Year for From Which Refund Which Refund Is Requested Date of the Amount of Amount of Is Requested Tax Payment Tax Refund 1 - Taxes Paid Requested ~.vn 19 C~/ 19 J. 19 $ 19 $ Tax payer's reason for refund (attach supporting documentation : - / I'll 111, 11 / , 1Z. i Ye al(Y C/ O ~ elr t~gr a men "I hereby apply for the refund of the abovedascrib g~d correct." is tru Nxes and certify that the Information I have given on this form Sl$rlature r _ ---------------------_~~Oc3 -0r Dale of AprPliae- flan for Tax Refund DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND: Approva! _ Disapproval Signature of Aulhorized officer Date - Signature of Presiding Officer(s) of Taxing Unit(s) for refund applications over $500 Date \i' Any Person who makes a Ialse entry upon the lorepolnn record 611011 be subfe0t to one of the following p not more Ihan 10 years nor toss than 2.. y6srs and/or a ~ 10rih In on Smeeenl;Non 2, 3Y .11con"Mement 0o, P "al al in fMP \ }Ins of not mon than $0,000 or both such Ane and Code, Jail for a term up t0 ! year or a fine not 10 exceed $2,000 of both such flneand ;lmossonft"t ""I c pEFVMO. )t n r. Benda X10. opS AQarida ilam„~~ y~., a ~wbyylprK•w;~lrlpw. tVpl~lyj)►yt tIM:'.~MM~M.w►4br+Mh, w• 1,•++~My ! ~f jltt~MrW h1, CV{IIM. IMk'COMPAt1 ~ LIPt k'r 1 ~ " 1 F l~" l Alr~'~(~/r r r v 4 rurn. ...~r~jlp ~.~.+,.,r,~4.4..atin. ~.yMgr,y.-.~ ~ e ~ tep~~r 41 ~ , .Y4EA. fildol~ r i~' mil, L . d 'OL ' Mrli f r j_ 0 PAGE ..._4 REPORT l'10R050W 02/04/92 AT I8141 D V E R P A Y N E N T 5 NAME ADDRESS _ AMOUNT STATUS Of PAYMENT ACCOUNT NO♦ RECEIPT NO. CORONAOU OF 34.26 CVERPAY 030802000D0 91/03/31-0446 FRANKLIN. WILLIAM N BERNARD ST 40.00 CVERPAY 0369110D000 9l/03/31-0592 OBLEW, NANDA J FCXCRBFT CIA 235.82 CVERPAY 02449600000 91/03/31-0732 O'BRIEN, DOROTHY G BOLIVAR ST-- 03400700000 9l/O3/31-0871 BAILEY. LARRY L. WELLINGTCH DR 406.08 CVERPAY 02131500000 9l/04/02-0535 HAMILTON, JAMES A JR I-35 A 4146 02,.11 0 7 CV OVERPAY 08109200000 91/04/03-0062 CARR, PALTER MO BERNARD ST ERPAY 345.36 OYBRPAY 03434400000 91/04/03-0323 IRLAS, JOSE G EVER5- OKWV- - - 34.26 OVERPAY 11072400000 91/04/03-0346 CARSTARPHSNr META G S LOCUST S ST T 23,20 CVERPAY 03569600000 91/04/03-0629 MCGREGOR• JOEL JUNG IN 0.0{ CVERPAY 03007300000 91/04/06-0144 BRADY, HENDERSON WILLIE _.1 rb 41.99... CVERPAY - 034t6500000 91/04/06-0220 ATKINS, T H I. M L JEFFRIES FRY 5T - - 74,26 OVERPAY 03499500000 91/04/06-0270 BLY• hONER B• - VALLEY VIEW RD 34,26 OVERPAY 03432200400 91/04/07-0202 ORCHANIAN, KEVORK M RIDGECREST CIR 0103 CVERPAY 02749800000 91/04/07-0321 HAMILTON. JACK M N LOCUST S7 _0.2p-.CVERPAY - - 02516400000 91/04/07-0394 MCDUNALDo STEVE T 8tlB-D-LIXKLN -34.26 LYEPPAY 01231100000 91/0 4/07-0397 CUNNINGHAM. -FRANKLIN W CAMELLIA $1 4.0{ CVERPAY 02274700000 91/04/07-0475 REYESr CATARINO B CARRIAGE HILL 34.2E CVERPAY 13244400000 91/44/07-0549 RIOEN, KEITH L BRANOVNtNE CIA -251.42--CVERPAY----- 10478E00400 91/04/00-4147 FOLSL. MICHAEL L _.ECTOR $T - - 4,40 OVERPAY _.02196000000.91/04/00-0154 KEALER. LISAN - - - N WOOD SY . DR 294090 OVERPAY 02866800000 91/04/08-0490 PLATT, ROSE MARIE SUN VALLEY 95.89 OVERPAY 07150000000 91/04/05-0569 JUSTUSr DONALD GILL 544ERATCN RD ...34.25--0VLRPAY------ - 02252000000 91/04/09-003 0 fi[NNINGSr J L --GLiMW000-1,N /09-0096 NVGENT$ J L BROKEN BOW ST 74.26 OVERPAY 07170600000 91 A4 04547500000 91/04/09-0713 KILLS, WALLACE E CRESTMEADON ST 34.2'_ CVERPAY qTakpAnCM 1;j 10761400004 91/04/09-0743 SMITHERS. GREGORY P 3080200000 91/04/09-0879 FRANKLIN:-WILLIAM N v> $76.40 OVERPAY W HICKORY -112 ' 0396940000 91/04/09- 960 SIMMONS, BARTUMN GgEENBFLAR ST 508457 CVCRPAV -._0.60-CVERPAY 02498000000 91/04/09-0980 KIZER. DANA C tOXDCNDERRVLN 498,84 OVERPAY --03937700000 91/04/10-0051 DENTON HOLLY LTD P/S GOLF CT 0.01 CVERPAY 02350100000 91 /04/10-0161 EMERSCN, RICHARD 0 LA PALCMA OF 0.01 CVERPAV /04/10-0185 SCHAFERr ANTHCNV B BOLIYA ST 03192300000 91 0,04 OVERPAY 10-0186 PANKEY♦ JOHN D E ALICE A EMERY 5T 6•86-- C 03365600000 91/04/ - - VEPPAV 0210050000091/04/10-0}.95 FRAUY,VELMA TITAN TR S7 0401 CVERPAY 02984000100 91/04/10-0196 SEAY, JOHN R W CK 0.01 OVERPAY 02067400 00 91/04/10-0199 SCHUELER, PAUL E WESSEX O CT RY •0l-OYIIRPAY- - 02130640000 91/04/10-0200 GARNER. JAMES BE ALL ROYAL EHI MCAIIII71S E Y1ND50g ST •01 CVERPAY L05077p0000 91/04/10-0202 NELSON, CHRIS M O1 CVERPAV 14496900000 9t/00/10-0204 GUTHRIE, JANICE L RAA 0.01 CVERPAY 02097100000 91/04/10-0209 YARRING7DNr MICHAEL K MISTMEVYWC1IR LN .C .GREEN-.CAKS- ST. 0.01-OVERPAY 03087804000 91 /D4/00-0210 SUFFRCNr PAUL R T----01182800000 91/04/10-0231 PITTMAN. CHARLES R S CARRCLL BLVD 0.Ot OVERPAY 5300000 91 /0 4/10-0212 GAZEBO APTS LTD S EAGLE ARR DR CLL BLVD 0,01 OVERPAY r 03365500 0.01 OVERPAY 000 91/04/411-0213 GAZEBO APTS LTD 08300000 9l /04/10-0219 LRWIN,S MALAEPK C 6.86 --OVERPAY 02{95400 BRADLEY ST 6.86 OVERPAY 000 91/04/10-0225 PHIPPSr 0336393092500000 9!/04/10-0229 LOTT• JOHN R PAISLEY ST 0,01 OVERPAY 08629000000 91/04/10-0230 STARRETT♦ ROBERT N DLUEBIFO CIA 0.01 OVERPAY 03 -..671.76 CVERPAV m 03239300000 91/04/10-0231 REED. STANLEY PARKSIOE OR ~w --_.1,0426000400 91/04/10-OJ49 DAVE, AJIT Y z T w 3Y:... 1. a {1 lr ` C ITY - COUNCIL • f~ A 000oooooaoaooo ~0Q O ~ p N ~dQQQ O ~ r 2 ~ V- D°QQQ ~ r + ~ nuOO~G °000°ccoccaoo~°°~ r ALL0001F 0 Benda IJo. _~Z~~~ip~'r t/} Agonda 110 r~~~ ,~I}- flora ' ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING A COMPETITIVE SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; a PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. AND WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated com- petitive sealed proposals for the purchase of necessary materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has reviewed and recommended that the herein described proposals are the best responsible proposals for the materials, equipment, supplies or services as shown in the "Proposals,, submitted therefor] and WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the city Budget for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the ma- terials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted herein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the numbered items in the following numbered bids for materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Proposals" on file in the Office of the City's Purchasing Agent filed according to the number assigned thereto, are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids for such items: BID ITEM NUMBER NO VENDOR AMOUNT 1317 All Xerox Corp. $104,990.00 S CTr~u rr, That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted proposals, the City offer of the persons submitting the proposals for suchcitems and agrees to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the terms, specifications, standards, quantities and for the specified sums contained in the Invitations, Proposals, and related documents. u t 1 Agenda No..~,' - Q~ Agenda 11-_ [big SECTIOLI IIr. That should the City and persons sub t n ap enter proved into accepted items and of the submitted proposals wish t he a formal written agreement as a result of the accep tance, approval, and awarding of the proposal, t he city Manager or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions, spec- ifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained the Proposal and related documents herein in approved and accepted, LXQTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the abc a numbered items of the submitted proposals, the City Council heret,-v authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and accordance with the approved proposal or pursuant to a written con tract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective imme- diately upon its passage and approval.. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1992. B08 CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BYO ~M C, 1 y` { C Agenda No. Agenda Ile;•pp~T Dale jk"/T ft 4 DATE: February 18, 1992 CI COUNCIL REPORT 1 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: RFSP $1317 - LASER PRINTER RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the proposal from Xerox Corp. in the amount of $1749.85 per month for 60 months be approved. SUMMARY: This Request for Sealed Proposal (RFSP) is for the 60 month lease/purchase of a highspeed, mainframe driven laser printer, Xerox model 4050. The monthly payments will be $1749.85 per month for 60 months. Total purchase price would be $104,990.00 plus maintenance, supplies and meter charges paid on an as needed basis. The funds necessary for payments this fiscal year (1991-1992) were approved as a supplemental package during the budget process. Forms currently being purchased from out sources such as checks, purchase orders, computer forms, municipal court forms and etc could be printed on this unit therefore shifting some of the budget dollars from outside expenditures to inside savings. High technology acquisitions are exempt from the bid process as per State Law however, they must as in this case follow provisions established in section 252.042 Request for Proposals for High Technology Procurements in the Texas Local Government Code. This acquisition was presented to the Data Processing Advisory Board and they recommend unanimous approval. BACKGROUND: Memorandum from Gary Collins, Director of Information Services, Data Processing Advisory Board Minute of February 4, 1992. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Information Services Division. c n I ti Cf CITY COUNCIL REPORT Agenda No, _ ~°OQS FEBRUARY 18, 1992 Agenda it PAGE 2 ~ i 7R _W PAGE 2 OF 2 ' ~7 4-1 FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for the 1991-92 portion of this acquisition will be taken from current Information Services budget account #100-044-0080-8509. 1991-92 payments are estimated to be $12,248.95. + Respectfully submitted: oyd . Harrell City Manager Approved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent 235.DOC C w j ~ u s; kenda No. ~oQ .....y„ Agontla Rom~7~-_. !1 3 f I Flo ~q ~9 ryn I f r , r CITY of DENTDN, TEXAS 215 E. McKINNEY / DEN TON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (B 17) 5669200 M F. M OR A N D U M DATE: February 11, 1992 TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager FROM: Gary A. Collins, Director of Information Services SUBJECT: Acquisition of a laser printer :x During the budget process last year a supplemental package of a laser printer for the IBM mainframe was approved. We have received the final quotations to our high tech RFP for the laser printer and the Data Processing Advisory Board has recommended that the City Council enter into a 60 month lease purchase agreement with Xerox for a new Xerox 4050 laser printer. The only other vendor to submit a proposal was Global Computer Corp. for a used Xerox 4050 laser printer. The proposal submitted from Global Computer Corp. had some serious flaws in it and did not meet all the requirements we had specified in the RFP. The funds for the first year's cost associated with this laser printer are in the current year budget. While there is a minimal impact on the General Fund for the first five years we will own the printer after five years and start realizing an approximate $15,000 per year reduction in operating costs associated with our current use of computer forms. If you have any questions or T can be of any further service please feel free to call on me. Gary Collins Director of Information Services CC: Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent r r. s~ . F ti Agenda 140. ~Q Agenda fl0/m_J-~ Wig =1~ cirY of DENTON, TEXAS 215 E. MCKINNEY/ DENTON, TEXAS 76P/TELOZ ON E (817) 566.8200 M E M O It A N 1) U M DATE: February 13, 1992 0 TO: Lloyd ilarrell, City Manager FROM: Gary A. Collins, Director of Information Services SUBJECT: Laser Printer Funding During the, budget process last year the proposal for the laser prinLer for the IBM mainframe reflected the first year costs associated with this piece of equipment, This package was presenLed as a commitment to a five year lease purchase with the first year costs being estimated at $54,977. This $54,977 cost reflects the costs associat.od with lousing the laser printer paying the monthly maintenance costs and fill associated supply costs. It was also estimated that we could reduce, the costs associated with special forms such as payroll checks, municipal court documents, purchase orders, and other similar forms currently printed on the IBM malnframo prinLer by $38,583. This cost reduction was determined by examining the usage of the appropriate forms for the prior 12 month period and extending that usage with the then current price of the various forms. Based on the first year cost estimates and tho cost reducLions it. was determined that this package; would cost: us $16$94 more tho first year than current funding for the various forms. During the budget ranking process it was determined that since the cost allocation study indicates that. 72'% of the cost, of data processing is allocated to the utility fund that 72Y. or $39,572 of this package would be allocated to the utility fund, Ba;;ed on this allocation and the $16,394 of actual increase. in operating costs a net increase of $23,178 of availarble funds to the general fund wits projected, If you have any (ILWS :ions about this funding or I caul be of any fu,rthor service please call art anytime, Gary 4. Collins Director of Information Services 1 C, 1 v. f; I; y~~a-.V1 YAL\l VA• a+saaaaasa a-r GENERAL FUND PAN93NG OF SUPPLENU NTAL PACBAGSS 1991-n PROPOSED BUDGET Agr3lida F€d ~r~'do i ~ `Ag~ntl It ~ ~ >Y: GROSS 10 GENERAL .,4 m PACRAG$ DEPARTMENT! 'P SUPP PKG POs TRANSFER & RBSOURCPS TTCLE DEPT bTVISION 8 AMOUNT' RHQ OFFSETS -REMAINING ~I PROJECTED REVENUE 26,044,160 I+ i ADD: BASELINE CUTSUtEVENUE INCREASES . . . . . 2,741,545 LESS: BASELINE FUNDING.. . . . . 27,955,410 AMOUNT REMAINING FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PACKAGES . . . . . . . . . . . (1,911,230) SUP JIME iTAL PACKAGES PROPOSED FOR 1991-92; PERSONAL COMPUTER' = CS CUST SERV N 4,500 0.0 0 `6 BOOKS LEGAL LBOAL R 185 0.0 125 (125) FILING CABINBT, ' LEGAL LEGAL N . 514 0:0 346 (471) CONTRACTS C E CODE ENFORCE R 23,000 0,0 0 (471) 416 0,0 280 (752): MAINTENANCE LEGAL LEGAL N , MANDATED RATE INCREASES P & R BLDG OPER R 26,725 0.0 23,457 (24,208) BIRTH CERT AUTOMATION TREAS MUN CT 'N 15.200 0.0 (800} (4408) MOVE TECH H E & T ENGINEERING N (37,022) -1.0 (37,022) 13,614 MOVE TECH i1 B & T ST PATCH N 37,022 1,0 37,022 (23,4x) u~ TUITION REIMBT PERS PERSONNEL N 4,000 0.0 1,933 (25,341) TML CONFERENCEP & D PLAN ADM R 300 0,0 296 (25,637) LEASEIFURCHASE OF XEROX M POL POLICE R 5,000 0.0 5,000 (30,637) m KENNELTRUCK . E 3 GNIMAL CONT N 6,600 0,0 . 1,453 (32,090) OLC GRANT MATCH NI P & D PLAN ADM G 11200 0.0 552 (32,642) TOWER UTIId' w FIRE EMERG MGMT . ;N 700 0.0 350 (321992) c V7 1 S ADMIN N 54,977 0.0 (23,178) (91813)' OLC O MATCH A2 P & D PLAN ADM `G 1,180 0.0 582 (10,395) OFFICE SUPPLIES P & D PLAN ADM P 2.%0 0.0 2,464 (12,859) ; PENAL CODBICODB BOOKS POL POLICE R 3,000 0.0 3,000 (15,959) VEHICLE 2705 E & T ST CONST N 7,189 0.0 3389 (19,048) AMBULANCE SUBSCRIPTION 1;IRE FIRE EMS N 15,000 0.0 (9,683) (10,365) A TRAVEL P & D MAIN ST N 200 0.0 200 (10,565) PCIPRMER GG ADMEN N 51900 0.0 3,741, (14,305) m PBRMA BINDING MACHINE Is ADMIN SERV N 2,000 0.0 1,849 (16,154) I m BUY MONEY FOR NARCOTIC UN POL POLICE N . 12,000 0.0 2,000 (18;154) F2 PAVEMENT PATCHING MACHINE E & T ST PATCH N 15,772 0.0 13,272 (31,426) \ Z UNIFORMS C E CODE ENFORCE N 450 0.0 450 (31,876) I v BUCKET TRUCK (3110) B & T TRAFFIC N 6,707 0.0 5,207 (37,083) REPLACE RIO 3565 P & R PARK MAINT N 2,817 0,0 (34,900) ARC-INFO CONFERENCE P& D PLAN ADM N 2,162 0.0 x,)91 (42,031) BOBCAT LOADER COM S DRAINAGE N 2.754 0.0 2,754 (44,785) CIP[BUDGET PUBLISHING PIN FIN ADMIN N 3,500 0.0 1,900 (46,685) PERSONNEL R 1,400 0,0 1,400 (48,085) CIV11,8VC EXAMS ' PERS i i 77 c S SS 1't1aM44 1 1~ (1 DIVISION NAME INFORMATION SERVICES _ agenda No. ADMINISTRATION/0080 Agendaltoln l FISCAL PAGE 1 YEAR 1991-92 SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING REQUEST '.'1 FORM PROGRAM TITLE - LASER PRINTER PROGRAM PERSONNEL REQUEST DETAIL; f L .NUMBER OF POS PROPOSED P05ION TITLE I BEGIN DATE/ f ANNUAL y None _ END DAT_ g J Ham` None N/A 0 PROGRAM EXPENDITURE DETAIL: f f ACCOUNT NtIMBBR f ACCOUNT TITLE I AMOUNT + 8130 8341 Computer Paper REUESTRD f Office 8509 Hire ofMEquipmentaintenanee 21,667. Sub Total 8,325 24.985 Funding Required $54,977. From Other Sources: 8130 (All Depts.) Computer paper `38,583 TOTAL PROGRAM FUNDING REQUIREMENT 2978J/7 C 21 - I ell K C' :.vii ~j I Y PROGRAM TITLE - LASER PRINTER (N) PAGE 2 ADonda No. BRIEF PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: We The funds requested in this package would allow us to easegurchase a laser printer that would be attached to the mainframe computer. This printer would allow us to design and create our own forms in-house and reduce the cost of special forms such as accounts payable checks, employee status sheets, purchase orders, complaints, warrants, eta. Also, this system would allow us to print on both aides of the paper, thus reducing our stock paper costs. a MAJOR SHORT-TERM PROGRAM GOALS (LIST 3 OR LESS): 1. Reduce the amount of paper usage 2. Reduce costs associated with special forms 3. Produce print characters currently not possible on existing high speed printers SPECIFIC AND MEASURABLE PROGRAM OBJECTIVES (LIST 3 OR LESS): r 1. Reduce forms costs by $16,916 1 2, Reduce storage space needed throughout the City for filing reports 3. Reduce time required for filing reports SPECIFIC PROGRAM PRODUCTIVITY MEASURES: INCREASE ABOVE j PRODUCTIVITY ABOVE BASELINE C BASELINE I A Reduce print time and paper cost $16,916 Standardize report size to 8 1/2" x 11" Reduce the amount of paper that ultimately ends up in the landfill Better utilization of paper Better and more timely production of special forma 2978J/8 c -22- t -W' 10 t PROGRAM TITLE - LASER PRINTER (N) Agenda No, PACE 3 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Vale -o~1g~= - A. EXPENDITURE REDUCTION: 17% .7 J9 Will this program result in direct cost savings? YE NO (Circle one) IF YES, INDICATE WHICH ACCOUNT NUMBERS ARE TO BE REDUCED BOTH BELOW AND ON THE BF-22 SUPP FORM. ACCOUNT NUMBER-1 ACCOUNT TITLE I' AMOUNT " 8130 Computer paper (All Departments) $160916 B. REVENUE ENHANCEMENT: „au Will thYO) gram directly result in increased revenues? YES (Circle one) IF YES, INDICATE WHICH ACCOUNT NUMBERS ARE TO BE INCREASED BOTH BELOW AND ON THE SF-21 SUPP FORM. 1 ~ ACCOUNT NUMBER I ACCOUNT TITLE I AMOUNT { None None $ 0 C. NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES: Will tan expenses rise/revenues decline if this program is not funded? YES OJ (Circle one) IF YES, INDICATE WHICH ACCOUNT MAY BE AFFECTED BELOW ONLY. ACCOUNT NUMBER I ACCOUNT TITLE AMOUNT + None None $ 0 D. W I8 PROGRAM OBLIGATE THE CITY TO PROVIDE FUNDING IN FUTURE YEARJ? NO (Circle one) 8. ARE ANY PROGRAM COS LATED TO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS NEW FACILITIES? YES ~1f0 (Circle one) IF YES, CODE SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST WITH "(C)" AFTER PROGRAM TITLE. F. ARE ANY PROGRAM C RELATED TO GRANTS SUCH AS MATCHING FUNDS OR SERVICES? YES NO (Circle one) IF YES, CODE SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST WITH +'(G)" AFTER PROGRAM TITLE. 2978J/9 -23_ v x i i Agenda No.'Q~, LASER PRINTER SAVINGS BREAKDOWN AgandaEtom 96,870.00 0.00876 2,082.11 1,090.00 2 X 5 6.00 54060 511.55 926 1 X 5 12 h. 1335 2520000 IMPRESSIO 24 1846.554829 40 XEROX 4060 TOTAL 1st YEAR 2ND YR 3RD YR 4TH YR 6TH YR LEASE 124,927 24,985 24,986 24,985 24,986 24,985 MAINTENANCE 62,725 8,326 11,100 11,100 11,100 11,100 USAGE CHARGE 54,180 10,836 10,836 10,836 10,836 100838 PLAIN PAPER 36,468 7,294 7,294 7,294 7,294 7,294 a PERF PAPER 6,876 1,376 1,375 1,375 1,376 11375 CARBONLESS 1,620 324 324 324 324 324 CHECKS 9,190 1,838 11838 11838 11838 1,838 VARIABLE COSTS TOTAL 21,667 21,667 21,667 21,667 21,667 5 YR TOTAL 285,986 54,977 57,752 67,752 67,752 57,752 CURRENT COSTS FORMS COSTS 213,198 38,583 40,513 42,638 44,665 46,898 FORMS REDUCT (16,917) (18,846) (20,871) (22,998) (26,232) DIFFERENCE 72,788 16,394 17,240 15,214 13,087 10,854 A lv. ~ 7 y {r 1j I 1 MINUTES OF DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD Qa' G~ MEETING OF FEBRUARY 04, 1992 Agenda No. Agenda kiom1k-- MEMBERS pREOS.-AT: Jim Kuykendall, Bob Minnis, Dale Don Edwards and Brian MEMBERS ABSENT: Cengis Capan OTHERS PRESENT: Gary Collins and Dave Dickey a Don Edwards made a motion the minutes from the December 9, 1991 meeting be approved. Bob Minnis seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Gary Collins explained that during the past budget process a supplemental package had been submitted requesting a Laser Printer for the mainframe and that the package was approved. Gary Collins stated that four vendors had either been sent or picked up the request for proposal for the Laser Printer. Of the four vendors two vendors, IBM and Tech Sys Capital, no BID the request for proposal. The two remaining vendors, Xerox and Global Computer Corp., proposed the same piece of equipment a Xerox 4050 Laser Printer. The difference between the two proposals is that Xerox proposed a new machine and Global Computer Corp. proposed a refurbished machine. Gary Collins indicated that the cost difference between the two proposals was approximately $13,500. Gary Collins supplied the board with cost break down of the proposals (see attached). Gary Collins indicated that he had some problems with the proposal from Global computer in that the quoted price was only valid until February 14, 1992 and they did not supply the serial number and manufacture date of the equipment proposed as the request for proposal required. Jim Kuykendall stated that the board needed to decide whether to recommend the new printer or the refurbished printer or no printer. Gary Collins , indicated that the Global Computer costs would be approximately $15,000 more the first year than the Xerox proposal. Bob Minnis asked if Gary Collins had determined what interest the city could earn on the $15,000 for five years. Gary Collins indicated he had not calculated that amount and it would be dependent on the interest rate used which currently is fairly low. Jim Kuykendall asked if we knew the age of the refurbished printer. Gary Collins indicated he did not even though the information was requested in the request for proposal. Gary Collins stated that under the Xerox proposal the maintenance costs were locked in for 5 years that could not be guaranteed under the Global Computer proposal. Don Edwards indicated that he felt the difference was too small between the two proposals to warrant purchasing the refurbished printer. Bob Minnis made the motion the Board recommend the City Council enter into a 5 year lease purchase agreement with Xerox on a new Xerox 4050 Laser Printer. Brian Scott seconded the motion and it was approved unanimously. I. P E 1 Under new Business Gary Collins told the Board that the City of Denton was the host city for the Texas Special Olympics and he was chairing the computer sub committee. Don Edwards asked how he could volunteer. Gary Collins told Don he would see that his name was turned into the chairman of the volunteer committee. There being no further business the meeting was adjourned. w ,a 11 Agenda No. Agenda ltom Date , C t a I FE CITY COUNCIL 9 y r ooooQaoooao 0000 - o~~ BOO vO H oooo~~~~~u C 0 u {,CQOC~~,oo l~ r. t~:F MCI 'i ;i ALL0001F Uunda N 9[~ -aos ~s ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVID- ING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated com- petitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has reviewed and recommended that :he herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the ma- terials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted herein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the numbered items in the following numbered bids for materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid Proposals" attached herto, are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids for such items: BID ITEM NUMBER NO VE. NDOR AMOUNT 1311 5 James Wood Denton $ 19,165.00 1318 1 Bill Utter Ford $ 210905.25 1318 2 Commercial Body $ 260261.00 1319 All Armstrong Medical Ind. Exhibit A 1328 All Conley Lott Nichols Inc. $45,000.00 SECTION II. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the terms, specifications, standards, quantities and for the specf_fied sums cont?ined in the Bid Invitations, Bid Proposals, and related documents. r. ' N k1 4 i Agenda ND. Agenda Ilem_._ ZL __r gale -A !k7?Z . 2 lS SECTION TIT. That should oth the city and submitted iah*inenter proved and accepted items and of into a formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written contract is irk accordance with the terms, conditions, spec- ifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained in the Bid Proposal and related documents herein approved a accepted. SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted bids, the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written contract , made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective imme- diately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1942• BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: C k U I v i EXHIBIT A PAGE 1 OT' 2 U I BID # 1319 i I BID NAME MEDICAL SUPPLIES ARMSTRONGI MEDICAL I A9Andd hla _12'Q~s OPEN JANUARY 28, 1992 AAentla Ilonr~_~~- ITEM DESCRIPTION I 1 lu~a _A-- 1. AIRWAY, NASOPHARYNGEAL, 20 FR 1 $3.40 1 '.3 !S 2. { AIRWAY, NASOPHARYNGEAL, 24 FR 1 $3.40 1 3. I AIRWAY, NASOPHARYNGEAL, 28 FR 1 $3.40 1 4. 1 AIRWAY, NASOPHARYNGEAL, 30 FR 1 $3.40 1 5. 1 AIRWAY, NASOPHARYNGEAL, 32 FR 1 $3.40 1 6. I AIRWAY OROPHARYNGEAL, 40 MM 1 $0.16 1 7. I AIRWAY OROPHARYNGEAL, 60 MM 1 $0.16 1 8. I AIRWAY OROPHARYNGEAL, 80 MM 1 $0.16 1 9. 1 AIRWAY OROPHARYNGEAL, 90 MM 1 $0.16 1 10.1 AIRWAY OROPHARYNGEAL, 100 MM 1 $0.16 1 11.1 AIRWAY, P.T.L. 1 $22.85 1 12.1 ALCOHOL, PREP 1 $1.65 1 13.1 BANDAGE, TRIANGULAR 1 $6.60 1 14.1 BLANKET, DISPOSABLE 1 $4.15 1 15.1 CERVICAL COLLAR, PEDI 1 $9.85 1 16.1 CERVICAL COLLAR, REGULAR 1 $9.85 1 17.1 CERVICAL COLLAR, TALL 1 $9.85 1 18.1 CERVICAL COLLAR, SHORT 1 $9.85 1 19.1 COMPRESS, COLD 1 $16.80 1 20.1 COMPRESS, HOT 1 $24.00 1 21.1 DRESSING, MULTI-TRAUMA 1 $1.75 1 22.1 DRESSING, 4r' I 23.1 DRESSING, 4" X 411, 2/PKG 1---`- I 24.1 DRESSING, 4" X 411, 10/TUB 1 I 25.1 ELECTRODES I i 26.1 ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE, 5.0 MM 1 $18.00 1 27.1 ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE, 6.0 MM 1 $18.00 1 28.1 ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE, 7.0 MM 1 $18.00 I 29.1 ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE, 8.0 MM 1 $18.00 1 30.1 FORCEPS, ADULT 1 $4.60 31.1 FORCEPS, PEDI 1 $4.20 1 32.1 IV CATHETER, 14 GA 1 I 33.1 IV CATHETER, 18 GA j I ^ 34.1 IV CATHETER, 20 GA 1 i 35.1 IV CATHETER, 22 GA 1 - I 36.1 LARYNGOSCOPE, BLADE, MACINTOSH SZ 11 $26.95 1 37.1 LARYNGOSCOPE, BLADE, MACINTOSH SZ 21 $26.95 1 38.1 LARYNGOSCOPE, BLADE, MACINTOSH SZ 31 $26.95 1 39.1 LARYNGOSCOPE, BLADE, WISCONSIN SZ 01 - 1 40.1 LARYNGOSCOPE, BLADE, WISCONSIN SZ 11 $26.95 1 41.1 LARYNGOSCOPE, BLADE, WISCONSIN SZ 21 $26.95 { 42.1 LARYNGOSCOPE, BLADE, WISCONSIN SZ 31 $26.95 1 43.1 LARYNGOSCOPE, HANDLE $14.50 { 44.1 NEEDLE, ASPIRATION 45.1 OBSTETRICAL KIT 1 $4.95 1 46.1 OXYGEN, CPR 1 $159.60 1 47.1 OXYGEN, CANNULA 1 $32.40 1 48.1 OXYGEN, MASK 1 $52.80 1 49.1 OXYGEN, PATIENT SUPPLY 1 50.1 OXYGEN, TUBING 1 $18.60 51.1 PEDI-PAC 1 $222.00 1 i i r i } EXHIBIT A PAGE 2 OF 2 BID 1319 1 BID NAME MEDICAL SUPPLIES [ ~(7~ndaNo. ~~~Q ARMSTRONG! n~wY OPEN JANUARY 28, 1992 I MEDICALA9 nda Ilam [ ITEM DESCRIPTION i ' , 52.1 RESUSCITATOR, ADULT 1 $101.70 1 lot 53.1 RESUSCITATOR, CHILD 1 $96.65 J 5 55.1 4.1 RESUSCITATOR, INFANT 1 $90.15 1 56.1 RING CUTTERTN REPLACEMENT BLADE 1 $$4.00 : 57.1 SCISSORS 1 $1.60 1 58.1 SHARPS CONTAINER 1 1 59.1 SHEET, BURN 60.1 SILVER SWADLER $5.35 61.1 SPHYGMOMANOMETER 1 $12.00 1 62.1 SPHYGMOMANOMETER, HAND ANEROID 1 $103.80 1 63.1 SPHYGMOMANOMETER, PEDI KIT 1 $130.65 1 64.1 STETHOSCOPE,DUAL HEAD CHESTPIECE $4.15 1 65.1 STETHOSCOPE 1 $43_90 66.1 SUCTION, W.T.TH BULB 67.1 SUCTION 68.1 TAPE, 1" 69.1 TAPE, 2" 70.1 THERMOMETER ' 71.1 TUBING DELIVERY 17-10 DYS 1 1 1(30 DAYS 1 1 11F OUT OF1 1 STOCK) 1 a ~z y, tom,. -i1 Agenda No. -DD Agandail0mDATE: February 18; 1992 0010 • S~/S CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: 7aloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1311 - PICKUP TRUCK AND VAN ~ (ITEM 5 ONLY) RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to James Wood Denton in the amount of $19,165.00. SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of a 3/4 ton Suburban type vehicle. It is a motorpool replacement and will be assigned to the Engineering Division. This unit will replace a 1983 Chevrolet 1/2 ton pickup and a 1985 Dodge 1/2 ton pickup. These trucks have maintenance cost of $6,576.00 and $5,457.00 respectively accumulated over the past 5 years. Due to a down sizing in the survey crew to three members,two vehicles are no longer used allowing for a down sizing in fleet size, Bath replaced trucks will be reviewed for possible reassignment to other departments, The replacement of these two vehicles was approved as a supplementary package during the budget process. The other items on this bid were approved January 7, 1992. This unit was delayed at that time pending Certificate of Obligation sale. BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet. ' PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Engineering Division and Motor Pool. FISCAL IMPACT: This purchase will be funded from Certificate of Obligation (CO's) previously approved by Council. Respe fully submitted: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager App oved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent t 232.DOC 4 k I rs k, HIn 1311 ! I I I I I I I BID NAME; PICKUPS, TRUCKS, VANI JAMES WOOD I KARI, KLEMENT I RILL UTTER I DAVE. KRAUSE 1 DENTON I FORD I FORD I DODGE 1 I I OPEN DATE DECEMBER 19, 19911 I I I I 1 I I I I _.....__L._._........__I ! ITEM DESCRTPTION 1 I I I I I I I I I ! 1. 1 TRUCK, PICKUP 112 TON 1 $12,445.00 I $9,256,00 1 $7,586.75 1 $13,356.85 I I I I I 1 2. I TRUCK, PICKUP 112 TON 1 $13,195.00 $9,948,19 I $9,679.75 ! $13,9?9.20 I I I I 1 1 I 4 3. 1 TRUCK, PICKUP 3/4 TON 1 $14,826.00 1 $13,899.38 1 $14,018.75 1 $15,173.80 1 I I I ! ! I 4, I TRUCK, PICKUP 3/I1 TON I $1411'10.00 1 $13,399.38 I $121372.00 1 $14,098.30 1 I CAR/CHASSIS I I I I I I I $ 5. I SUBURBAN, 3/4 TON 1 $19,165.00 1 N/B 1 N/B I N/B I 1 6. I VAN, 12 PASSENGER 3/4 TONI $20,710.00 I $17,149.00 ! $16,260.75 1 $18,803.80 I f 3 0 1 I I I 1 7. 1 TRUCK, 1 TON CAB/CHASSIS $15,235.00 ! $12,899.93 1 $12,468.00 1 $151572.35 1 60"WB I I I ! I f I I I I 1 I p 8. I TRUCK, 1 TON CAB/CHASSIS 1 $151365.00 1 $13,031.43 1 $12,693.00 1 $15,811.70 1 ! 84~,we I I I I I O.Z ! I I I I I I DELIVERY 60-90 DAYS 1 60-75 DAYS 1 60-75 DAYS I 60 DAYS I I I I I I 1 h Poe h a y 10da ND. -DD,S _jg M190nda fleet ~c nd IA318 DATE: February 18, 1992 5 (Q Af CITY COU CIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1318 AERIAL DUCKET DEVICE RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specifications as follows: ' Item 1 Truck Cab/Chassis Bill Utter Ford at $21,905.25 Item 2 Aerial Device/Body Commercial Body at $26,261.00_ TOTAL BID AWARD $48,166.25 SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of an Aerial Device (bucket truck) for the Traffic Control Division. This unit is a motorpool replacement for a 1983 Dodge 1 ton Van with Aerial Lift Device. The old unit has a five year accumulated maintenance cost of $17,538.00 and is no longer economical or safe to operate. This unit is utilized for responding to emergency call-out, signal construction and other functions requiring the use of the lift device. The lower price offered by Drake••Skruggs fails to meet specifications and is not compatible with the trucks that were specified and bid. Drake Skruggs offered a power connection compatible with standard transmission only; Automatic was specified. BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Engineering and Transportation Division as well as Motor Pool Fleet Operations. FISCAL IMPACT: This u.,.it will be funded from Certificate of obligation funds previously approved by Council. 4Re,spe fully submitted: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Approved by: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. l Title: Purchasing Agent 1318.DOC c ti D.FL DID # 1318 I I I I I 1 I I I I I Dm rare ncRUU. BWM. I LM I MAHANAY I HUDIBERp I BILL Lmn I SOPIAMM j DEVICE I I i i I 1NT~L OPEN JANUARY 9, 1992 I I 1 1~ I I I I 1 # I rrEM DFXRM'ICN I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VF7IDOft I'- I I I~ I I i VENDOR 1. I 1R1.CK CAB/C11ASS.IS I I I I I I I I X2,0718.00 I $23,595.00 1 x23,202.00 I $'1,905.25 I x22,035.00 1 2, I AF"d, BLCKEr & I 1 1 I I I I UTILITY BODY 1 1 I 1 1 i 526,976,00 i ! X28,115.00 1 I I 3.' WIMMM UNIT I $+9,02.4.00' i $51,357,00 1 I I I I I 1 I DI IVEAY I 120-150 I 90-120 1 120 DAYS I 75 DAYS 1 60-120 I DID 0 1318 I I I I I I BID MWE AERVI BUCKET I ALIM DRAKE & scmx;;.S l WM FORD I CcMCXI& j DMCE I i ' I BODY I OPEN JAMIARY 9, 1992 1 1 1. I 1 1 I A I r" DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I_ 1_ I r 1_ I I_ I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 vFrA I a 1.1 TRUCK CAB/CHASSIS I I 1 1 1 c 1 I 522,527.00 I - i X2,71371,00 i X2,496.00 I I I 2.1 AERIAL BUCKEI'& I I I I I I r 1 UrIi_iTY BODY 1 428,155.00 1 $25,958.93 1 $26)261,Do i $26,261.00 I I I I ~ ~ ~ 3.1 CUVLM UNIT + 0,682.00 { i $7181695.00 i $718,759,00 I G~ I I I 1 I 180 DAYS I 120-150 I 1 I t i° c ,It s a Agenda No. Y2 Agenda 11em_K5 Oats --DATE: February 18, 1992 Pt 1 t X CITY COUNCIL REPORT TOi Mayor and Members of the city council FROM, Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager r SUBJECT: BID #1319 MEDICAL SUPPLIES RECOMMENDATION: Council award bid #1319 Medical Supplies to the low bidder, Armstrong Medical Ind., for the unit prices as shown on Exhibit A. SUMMARY: This bid is for the annual price comparison of medical supplies used by the Fire Department. It is estimated that the annual expenditure for medical supplies will be approximately $18,000.00, BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet, Memorandum from James Thomason, Assistant Fire Chief, PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Fire Department. FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted Account #100-060-0053•-8106 (Medical Supplies). 50giW- ull/y submitted: C/ Harrell City Manager A Prepared by. n~ Name: Melanie Harden Title: Buyer Ap~roved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Puxcnasing Agent /Jh 231.DOC C e c, ti t jr r= 4k 1 BID # 1319 I f f BID NAME MEDICAL SUPPLIES IARMSTRONGI MOORE SHOUDEL I MEDICAL MEDICAL OPEN JANUARY 28, 1992 1 ~ ondaNo,._ I~ A I ITEM DESCRIPTION 1. ( AIRWAY, NASOPHARYNGEAL, 20 FR 1 $3.40 2. I AIRWAY, NASOPHARYNGEAL, 24 FR j $3.40 I I I 3. I AIRWAY! NASOPHARYNGEAL, 28 FR $3.40 I $4,39 I I 4. I AIRWAY, NASOPHARYNGEAL, 30 FR $3.40 1 $4,39 I - I 5, I AIRWAY, NASOPHARYNGEAL, 32 FR $3.40 I $4.39 1 I 6. I AIRWAY OP.OPHARYNGEAL, 40 MM $0.16 1 I I 7, I AIRWAY OROPHARYNGEAL, 60 MM $0.16 1 I I ° 8, j AIRWAY OROPHARYNGEAL, 80 MM 1 $0.16 I I 1 9. AIRWAY OROPHARYNGEAL, 90 MM 1 $0.16 j - I I 10. AIRWAY OROPHARYNGEAL, 100 MM 1 $0.16 I 11.1 AIRWAY, P.T.L. I $22.85 I j 12,; ALCOHOL, PREP 1 $1.65 $2.86 13.1 BANDAGE, TRIANGULAR I $6.60 $6.00 $18.76 14.1 BLANKET, DISPOSABLE I $4.15 1 $4.34 15,1 CERVICAL COLLAR, PED?, I $9.85 f $13.75 ( I 16.1 CERVICAL COLLAR, REGULAR I $9.85 1 $13.75 1 { 17.1 CERVICAL COLLAR, TALL I $9.85 I $13.75 1 I 18.1 CERVICAL COLLAR, SHORT 1 $9.85 1 $13.75 19,1 COMPRESS, COLD I $16.60 1 $9.00 1 I 20,1 COMPRESS, HOT 1 $24,00 1 $12.25 1 - I 21.1 DRESSING, MULTI-TRAUMA I $1.75 I $1.45 I I 22.1 DRESSING, 411 I $57.84 I - 1 23.1 DRESSING, 411 X 411, 2/PKG 1 $81.90 I 24,1 DRESSING, 41, X 4°, 10/TUB I 1 I 25.1 ELECTRODES I ( 1 26,1 ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE, 5.0 MM 1 $18.00 1 $25.50 1 I 27.1 ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE, 6.0 MM 1 $18.00 $25.50 1 I 20.1 ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE, 7.0 MM I $18.00 $25.50 29.1 ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE, 8.0 MM I $18.00 1 $25.50 30.1 FORCEPS, ADULT I $4.60 I $6.54 1 I 31.1 FORCEPS, PEDI 1 $4.20 1 $5.56 1 32.1 IV CATHETER, 14 GA 1 1 33.1 IV CATHETER, 18 GA 34.1 IV CATHETER, 20 GA 1 I 1 I 35.1 IV CATHETER, 22 GA 36,1 LARYNGOSCOPE, BLADE, MACINTOSH SZ 11 $26.95 1 $36,30 37.1 LARYNGOSCOPE, BLADE, MACINTOSH SZ 21 $26.95 1 $36.30 38.1 LARYNGOSCOPE, BLADE, MACINTOSH SZ 31 $26.95 1 $36.30 I 39.1 LARYNGOSCOPE, BLADE, WISCONSIN SZ 01 1 I 40.1 LARYNGOSCOPE, BLADE, WISCONSIN SZ 11 $26.95 1 $36.30 I 41.1 LARYNGOSCOPE, BLADE, WISCONSIN SZ 21 $26.95 1 $36.30 I 1 42.1 LARYNGOSCOPE, BLADE, WISCONSIN SZ 31 $26.95 1 $36.30 I - 1 43.1 LARYNGOSCOPE, HANDLE 1 $14.50 1 $24.25 44.1 NEEDLE, ASPIRATION ( I ' I I 45.1 OBSTETRICAL KIT 1 $4.95 1 $6.00 1 -y~-- I 46.1 OXYGEN, CPR I $159.60 $203.00 - 47.1 OXYGEN, CANNULA I $32.40 I $25,80 48,1 OXYGEN, MASK I $52.80 1 $66.70 { 49.1 OXYGEN, PATIENT SUPPLY I ( - f 50,1 OXYGEN, TUBING I $18.60 1 $21.40 1 I ~ I $222.00 I $211.30 51.1 PEDI-PAC 1 I c y Vn J Mi F' e Sj i! Agenda No. _ "Ads Agenda Ilom-FS -,M. le2 ~ BID # 1319 Date 1 /.f BID NAME MEDICAL SUPPLIES fARMSTRC?NUI MOOR. XIDEL I by MEDICAL MEDICAL OPEN JANUARY 28, 1992 J 1 ITEM DESCRIPTION 52.1 RESUSCITATOR, ADULT 1 $101.70 1 1 J 53.1 RESUSCITATOR, CHILD $96.65 54.1 RESUSCITATOR, INFANT $90.15 1 1 55.1 RING CUTTER $10.05 1 $12.19 1 56.1 RING CUTTER, REPLACEMENT BLADE $4.00 $4.57 57.1 SCISSORS j -$1.60 ' -$4_20 ! 1 58.1 SHARPS CONTAINER 59.1 SHEET, BURN $4.29 60.1 SILVER SWADLER $5.35 1 61.1 SPHYGMOMANOMETER $12.00 $14.15 62.1 SPHYGMOMANOMETER, HAND ANEROID 1 $103.60 $107.90 s 63.1 SPHYGMOMANOMETER, PEDI KIT 1 $130.65 1 64.1 STETHOSCOPE,DUAL HEAD CHESTPIECE 1 $4.15 1 $5.51 J 1 65.1 STETHOSCOPE 1 $43.90 1 $43.90 1 1 66.1 SUCTION, WITH BULB 1 1 67.1 SUCTION - 1 $1.92 1 1 68.J TAPE, 1" 1 - $14.13 1 1 69.1 TAPE, 2" 1 $10.92 1 1 70.1 THERMOMETER 1 1 1 1 71.1 TUBING f DELIVERY 17-10 DYS 1 4-6 DYS 1 1 1(30 DAYS 1 J JIF OUT OF1 1 1 1 1 STOCK) 1 5 r Agenda No, _ y Agenda Qam~p Qtle MEMO TO: Denise Harpool, Assistant Purchasing Agent FROM: James R. Thomason, Assistant Fire Chief DATE: February 4, 1992 SUBJECT: EMS SUPPLIES 0011 After considering the bids received for medicalWesupplies we have decided to award our bid to Armstrong Medical. appreciate your assistance in this matter, if you have further questions of us please call. JRT/lh .a C J ; j. `i AGandaNo. Agenda Item__~~ Date DATE: February 18, 1992 CITY COIL PORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID x{1328 - PAVEMENT PATCHING MACHINE RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specification Conley Lott Nichols Inc. in the amount of $45,000.00. FOB Denton with delivery in 1 day, SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of a Pavement Patching Machine designed for pot hole type repairs as well as streetcut repairs. Due to the cost of this equipment the City of Denton has rented a like machine for a period of time and the unit has proven to be very successful. The option of a demo unit was bid at a lower price. The two units offered failed to meet specifications and also used equipment does not meet the bond covenant for Certificate of Obligations. BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet, memorandum from Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering and Transportation, PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Street Maintenance, Motorpool and Citizens of Denton. FISCAL IMPACT: This purchase will be funded from Certificate of obligation sales previously approved by Council. Respec ully submitted: CL1 yd V, Harrel l City Manager Approved: Names Tom D. Shaw, C,P,M. Title: Purchasing Agent TS/jh 233.DOC c ' k f Aourdk: Agonda Itam RS t_ CITy of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTO , ?'EYA 76201 MEMORANDUM 4 DATE: February 6, 1992 TOi Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent FROM: Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering & Transportation SUBJECT: Bid #1328 We have evaluated the bids for the pavement patching machine. The main issue for us is to obtain the beat machine possible. That is best achieved by purchasing a new machine. Purchasing a new machine also will meet the requirements in the bond covenants for CO's. We recommend the bid be awarded to Conley-Lott-Nichole for a new machine at the cost of $45,000 as shown in item 1, new and unused. Please place this on the February 18, 1992 City Council agenda. Budgeted funds are more than adequate for this year. The technology being purchased will enable us to reduce and eventually eliminate cold mix. That is the product placed on streets to temporarily fix street deterioration. Since the life of that product can be as short an one day, it is very ineffective. The pavement patcher uses an asphalt gunite to pressure compact this material into shallow or deep potholes. success has been good on all but those which stay wet all the time. Please advise if you need further information. is r C rk AEEOOODC 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 k a BID f 1328 I I I I I I I I I I i BID NAME PAVEMENT PATCHINO I MOODY-DAY I DARR I KIRBY-SMITH I ZIMMERMAN I CONLEY-LOTT MACHINE I I EQUIPMENT I MACHINERY I EQUIPMENT I NICHOLS OPEN JANUARY 23, 1992 I k I I I I I ITRM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR 1 VENDOR _ I^ VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 1.1 NEW & UNUSED I N/B N/B I N/B I $117,650.00 k $45,000.OC I I I I I i I W DEMO UNIT I N/B I N/B f $23,000.00 E N/B I $27,850.00 E I I f I I I I I DELIVERY I I 1 5 DAYS I 90 DAYS I 1 DAY I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N~ O pw O vll a C t, r _ ;1 } MM. CCOUNCIL 0000~o a o o a a o o n v ooo~o a O O e q ~O o m. t e p0w~0 C6GG~~~C r. r 7 l 1 elect,92 p ~l lpenda No. Agenda Hom.._I Date ORDINANCE NO. R AN ORDINANCE ORDERING AN ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ON MAY 2, 1992, AND, IF A RUNOFF ELECTION IS REQUIRED, ON MAY 30, 1992, FOR THE PURPOSE OF ELECTING COUNCILMEMBERS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON? TEXAS, TO PLACES 5 AND 6 AND ELECTING A MAYOR TO PLACE 7; ORDERING THAT THE PUNCH CARD ELECTRON- IC VOTING SYSTEM BE USED) DESIGNATING VOTING PLACES AND APPOINTING ELECTION OFFICIALS; PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THE ELECTION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSt SECTION . That a municipal election is ordered to be held in the City of Denton, Texas, on Saturday, May 2, 1992, for the pur- pose of electing Councilmembers for Places 5 and 6 and electing a Mayor to Place 7. In the event a runoff is required, the runoff election shall be held on Saturday, May 30, 1992. SECTION II. That the polling places, which shall be open from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m, shall be as follows: 1. Voters residing in District No. 1 shall vote at: MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. RECREATION CENTER 1300 WILSON STREET DENTON, TEXAS 2. Voters residing in District No. 2 shall vote at: FIRE STATION NO. 4 2110 SHERMAN DRIVE DENTON, TEXAS 3. Voters residing in District No. 3 shall vote at: NORTH LAKES RECREATION CENTER 2001 WEST WINDSOR DRIVE DENTON, TEXAS 4. Voters residing in District No. 4 shall vote at: DENIA PARK RECREATION CENTER 1001 PARVIN DENTON, TEXAS Y. AGondo No. Ago+tda Uote ' the III. That the election officials ?Orthellection and runoff, if any, shall be as follows: 1. For the Central Counting Station: R, B. Escue, Presiding Judge; Lee Knox, Alternate Judge; Randie Smith, Manager; and Carol Pelzel, Tabulation supervisor. 2. For District No. 1: Catherine Bell, Presiding Judge and Betty Kimble, Alternate Judge. a 3. For. District No. 2: Doris Chipman, Presiding Judge and Mary Mecay, Alternate Judge. 4. For District No. 3: David Arno, Presiding Judge and Dorothy Alderdice, Alternate Judge. 5. For District No. 4: Ralph Pike, Presiding Judge and Barbara Pike, Alternate Judge. 6. Jennifer Walters, City Secretary, shall conduct early voting under the Texas Election Code. 7. R. B. Escue shall be Presiding Judge for the Early Ballot Board. The presiding judge of the Central Counting Station and of each district are authorized to appoint a sufficient number of clerks as necessary to assist them in the election, including bilingual as- sistants as required by law. The rate of pay for election judges and clerks shall be the maximum amount provided for by State law. SECTION IV. That early voting shall be conducted for the election, and the runoff election if necessary, by the Office of the City Secretary in the Municipal Building at 215 East McKinney Street in the City of Denton, Texas in accordance with State law. SECTION V. That the Mayor is hereby directed to provide notice of the election and the runoff election if necessary, in accor- dance with Sections 4.002 and 4.003 of Texas Election code, the notice to be printed in the Spanish language and the English language. SECTION VI. That City Secretary is authorized to prepare the official ballot for the election and perform every act required by the Charter and laws of the State of Texas for holding elections. PAGE 2 ti h h. 4 I 4 Agenda No. Agenda Item R5 We SECTION VII. That an electronic voting sy~Lem, Ueeting the requirements of chapter 124 of the Texas Election Code shall be used for said election. SECTION VIII. . That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR 0wo ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY AT'.ORNEY BY: _ a PAGE 3 G n F y \l v t JCITYEEM COUNCIL 4 rh- A 00000oo04oaaQa ~ppp°oo - a , o0 8 °oofe ~o 41 V. 0 ~~~Op r a x , ~ £ ~p0~ p~4CCGGGGO~G 1 le f I ~7 } .p WAshna Nonda No, - Agenda Itom ? ORDINANCE NO, pole AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND WASHINGTON NATIONAL CASUALTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: a SECTION I. That the attached Settlement Agreement and Release with Prejudice of all Pending and Future Claims between the City of Denton and Washington National Casualty, providing for the settlement and compromise of the litigation now pending between the parties before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, C. A. No. 4:91CV61, is auapphoriroved in toaexecutec thelagreement eand al1T other City documents r and take such action as is necessary to comply with the terms of said agreement. SECTION II. That this ordinance shall become effective immedi._ ately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of February, 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY ' BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: n v ~i y n N IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ddee SHERMAN DIVISION Agenda No. _L-OD Agonda 11om_95 THE CITY OF DENTON, § Date ~ Plaintiff, §12 /O VS. § C.A. NO. 4:91CVG1 § WASHINGTON NATIONAL § INSURANCE COMPANY, § Defendant. § SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the "Agreement") is entered into by and between Washington National Insurance Company ("Washington National") and the City of Denton, Texas ("Denton") on the date last acknowledged below. W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Denton established a self-°unded employee welfare A benefit plan providing comprehensive medical expense benefits to Denton's employees; WHEREAS, Denton solicited bids to provide individual stop-loss and aggregate stop-loss insurance for the Plan; WHEREAS, by City Ordinance number 87-177 Denton accepted Washington National's proposal for the stop-loss insurance and authorized the expenditure of funds for the insurance coverage; SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE - Page 1 c_ w r E' a s Agenda No, ~'DD Agenda item-~ WHEREAS, an individual stop-loss at%O- ggrP_qaZs--.•stopF-Yoss ~p agreement (the "Stop-Loss Agreement") was entered into between Washington National and Denton; WHEREAS, a dispute arose between Washington National and Denton as to the terms and provisions of the Stop-Loss Agreement; WHEREAS, Denton submitted individual and aggregate stop loss claims to Washington National under the Stop-Loss Agreement; WHEREAS, Washington National denied certain claims and certain expenses for which claims had been submitted to it under the stop- Loss Agreement; WHEREAS, a dispute arose between Denton and Washington National as to the respective obligations of the parties to the Stop-Loss Agreement regarding the claims submitted and amounts sought for reimbursement; WHEREAS, on or about March 8, 1991, Denton filed suit in the 211th Judicial District Court of Denton county, Texas, said action being numbered 91-30147-211 on the docket of the 211th Judicial District Court; WHEREAS, on April 5, 1991, Washington National removed the action to the United states District for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division there bearing civil action number 4:91CV61 on the docket of the United States District Court (the "Lawsuit"); SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE - Page 2 1 1 Y+ d Agenda No. Agenda Item Data WHEREAS, in the Lawsuit, Denton sought damages for alleged breach of contract, breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing and alleged violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices - Consumer Protection Act, Tex. Bus. Com. Code § 17.41 et, sea. (the "DTPA") and Tex. Ins. Code Art. 21.21, and sought to recover actual damages, punitive damages, consequential damages, statutory damages, attorneys fees, interest, and costs of court; WHEREAS, Washington National denied Denton's allegations in the Lawsuit; WHEREAS, Washington National and,Denton desire to settle and resolve the controversies herein between them; and WHEREAS, Washington National and Denton intend that the full terms and conditions of the compromise and settlement be set forth in this Agreement, NOW, THEREFOR, in consideration of the promises and covenants herein set forth, and for other good and valuable consideration, it is AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 11 Payment of $175,000.00. Washington National has herewith paid to Denton the total sum of $175,000.00 by and through Washington National's check no. 010634 in the amount of $830000,00, check no. 0106332, in the amount of $83,00u.00 and check no. 0106333 in the amount of $9,000.00, all. made payable to "The City of Denton, Texas and its attorney, R. William Wood" {the SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT &tjQ RELFLU, - Page 3 l r: 1! ro; Agenda No. 99,2.00 1 -7 V Agenda Romsfl,z_ Date 100 ' Jf""t /o "Settlement Draft"). Denton expressly acknowledges and re rese is that it has received the Settlement Draft as consideration for this Agreement. 2. Release by De ton. Denton, for itself and its legal representatives, successors, assigns, employees, agents, and A citizens, hereby RELEASES, ACQUITS, AND FOREVER DISCHARGES Washington National, and its legal representatives, successors, assigns, affiliated companies, employees, officers, shareholders, directors, and attorneys from any and all claims, demands, debts, and causes of action, known or unknown, against Washington National arising out of or relating to (1) the Stop-boss Agreement and any version thereof including all amendments, supplements and addenda thereto; (2) any and all individual or aggregate stop-loss claims or claims of any nature submitted or which could have been submitted by Denton under the Stop-Loss Agreement specifically including, but without limitation, all claims incurred, paid, handled, denied, ov administered in any manner by Denton or its employees, representatives, or agents for the period from October 11 1987 through October 31, 1988; (3) any and all claims arising out of or relating to the Plan; and (4) any and all claims asserted or aa.sertable in the lawsuit, 3. Release by Washington National,. Washington National, for itself and its legal representatives, successors, assigns, employees, officers, directors, shareholders, and attorneys SET`;'LE ENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE - Page 4 4 v. q v F, Agenda No. p o - Agenda 110m_17i!6_V_ [tale g"lf_ ~D RELEASES, ACQUITS, AND FOREVER DISCHARGES Denton, nd its employees, agents, successors, legal representatives, assigns, and citizens from any and all claims, demands, debts, and causes of action, known or unknown, against Denton arising out of or relating to (1) the Stop-Loss Agreement and any version thereof including all amendments, supplements and addenda thereto; (2) any claim for past due premium on the Stop-Loss Agreement; and (3) and all claims asserted or assertable in the Lawsuit.' 4. Rporesentation and Indemnification, Washington National and Denton represent to one another that they are the owners and holders of the claims being released herein and that they have not assigned any claims being released herein and in that regard agree to indemnify and hold one another harmless from any loss, cost or expense including, without limitation, attorney's fees, from any claim that may be asserted by, through or under them. 5. No Prejudice, The releases by the parties, hereto of one another shall be without prejudice, without waiver of, and without any affect whatsoever upon any claim which Washington National or Denton may have against any other party. 6. Llismissal. Washington National and Denton agree to dismiss their claims, demands, debts, and causes of action asserted against one another in the Lawsuit WITH PREJUDICE, with costs taxed against the parties incurring them. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE - Page 5 v. ? ie H . ~I !t 11 1 i~ t ` Agenda No. Agenda Ilom_j 1• Bindin Effect. It is understood and agreed th t?is0 Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Washington National and Denton and their respective heirs, employees, agents, representatives, successors, assigns, employers, • directors, officers, shareholders, citizens and attorneys, 81 No Admission, payment of the consideration herein is „I merely a settlement of disputed claims and is not to be considered an admission of liability, the same being expressly denied, 9. Choice _of Law. The parties mutually agree that this Agreement shall be construed and enforced under the laws of the State of Texas. 10. No other Aar_ eements. It is understood and agreed that this Agreement contains the entire agreement between Washington National and Denton and supersedes any and all prior agreements, arrangements, or understandings between the parties relating to its subject matter, This Agreement cannot be changed or terminated orally, 11. Counterparts, The Agreement may be signed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be an original, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date acknowledged below. CSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE - page 6 r~ 1 k AQendaNo. _~~77~~~rrff~•~ Ag en daa~ l to m_ A~.c...l..Y Dale - !P~_3 A I . 8 ~Q WASHINGTON N T ONAL INSURANCE COMPANY BY: Its Vice President d Counsel p yyolai.E~GMENT ' STATE OF Illinois § S COUNTY OF Cook § BEFORE ME, the undersigned Notary Public, in and for the State Illinois on this day personally appear^a of , Geri M. Gaughan , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that she executed the same in the capacity therein stated for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, this 27th day of January , 1992. C~ " OF( 1"% J L.. l A L > ROSE M, KHONKOW Notary Public in and for NOLARY PUBLIC. SWC OF ItUNO' ` the State of Illinois MT COMMISSION EXPIRES 1/16194 Hwy c Rose Pi, Kronkow Printed Narne of Notary My Commission Expires: January 16, 1994 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE - Page 7 t l r. { :E `J r fi~onda~Jo.~~G Agonda Ilom R55 7v we THE CITY OF DENTON By. Mayor ATTEST: city secretary (Printed Name) ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DENTON § BEFORE ME, the undersigned Notary Public, in and for the State of Texas, on this day personally appeared known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in the capacity therein stated for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. day of GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, this 1992. Notar in and for " the State of Texas Printed Name of Notary My commission Expires: SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEAS - Page S C i ~t Agenda No. Or APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: Ag Ageanda ~ Itom om_ Dat BY: City Attorney (Printed Name) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE - Page 9 C~ C{ ti. ~ ii #JJME~= C I T Y llijiL COUNCIL a L. ~ 11 ooQ4aaa ~ OOO~Op ° ' ~ e D~~oDO o ' 4CCOGGU~ C a J A Dgonda No. r- Agenda 1tanl • In/ . ~ rebruary 18, 19" CITY COUNCIL AGENDA IThW Q TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CI'T'Y COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager RE: CONSIDER ORDINANCE. AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AND THE TOWN OF CORINTH, TEXAS, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utilities Board recommends approval of an amendment to the Corinth/Denton water contract reducing the maximum water demand. BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: On August 27, 1991, Corinth requested an amendment to their water contract in order to reduce their annual water demand from Denton. A task force of the Public Utilities Board reviewed this issue and responded affirmatively with certain criteria. The Council reviewed and agreed with the provisions outlined by the Board, and a letter was sent to Corinth responding to their request. On January 15, 1992, the Public Utilities Board approved the proposed amendment with some slight wording modification to clarify a couple of points that Corinth had raised. Tile revised amendment was sent to Corinth and approved on February 6, 1992, by the Corinth City Council. The major points of the Agreement remain the same as reviewed by the Council at the October 1, 1991, meeting and are as follows: 11 Donton and Corinth honor the present 1.25 MCI) demand request until October 1, 1992. 2. Requested demand will be reduced from 1.25 MGD to 1.0 MGD effective October 1, 1992. 3. Requested demand will be reduced to not less than .75 MGD effective October 1, 1993, pending Corinth advising Denton by Septombor 1, 1993, of any reduction below 1 MGD that is Desired. 9. That the final maxhniun daily water demand request remaining after these reductions will represent the absolute maximum d--mand that Denton will provide, that Corinth will obtain any udditionr' -:tor Prom other sources, and that Denton will not, after October 1, 19020 carry any rosorves for Corinth's future growth in water roquiromonts. (l ..d fit K{ y 5+ I~ u pf 1 Agenda Hom_ E Date City Council Agenda Item Corinth/Denton Water Contract Amendment Page 2 5 , That this amendment to the contract for a reduction in demand is agreed to based on Corinth's ultimate commitment to shift from being a Denton treated water customer to an Upper Trinity Regional Water District treated water customer. FISCAL IMPACT: Reduction in Denton's revenues would be., $60,000 revenue fiscal 1993 $120,000 revenue fiscal 1994 $120,000 revenue fiscal 1995 $120,000 revenue fiscal 1996 $120,000 per year represents 1% on Denton's rates. DEPARTMENTS/GROUPS AFFECTED: Citizens of Denton, Denton Municipal Utilities, Public Utilities Board, City Council, Logal Department, City of Corinth. Rospe ully, 1 yd .Iiarrell, City Ma agor Prepared by, A Iloward artin, DI ector Environmental Op/ in. Admin. APPROVED BY: RrE. Nelson, executive Director Dopartment of Utilities EXHIBITS Amendment to Corinth Contract (proposed) City of Denton/Corinth Water Contract Minutes PUB Meeting of 1/15J92 Ordinance C~ A. Corinthc, 218 Disk AA Y. ✓ ` li F i agenda r'lo. g~ •pos _ Draft Minutes January 15, 1992 Apondallem 32 tale . A/ 2 3 EXCERPT 4 MINUTES PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD 5 January 15, 1992 6 7 s~ 8 6. CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO CORINTH WATER CONTRACT. 9 Nelson introduced this item advising he had met with the City of Corinth and 10 the Legal Department discussing briefly some of Corinth's concerns. He 11 distributed the agreement that had been reviewed by the Legal Department. 12 13 Coplen asked if Corinth lowered the demand 600, 000 gallons, do they have the 14 right to adjust up? Martin advised they could not go below the 750,000 per 15 day. Nelson indicated this would change the method by which Denton 16 establishes rates. Denton now has a 20% reserve capacity in the plant. Corinth 17 represents 5% of the system and is picking up 5% of the reserve capacity; once 18 tho amendment becomes effective, Corinth will no longer have rights to 19 Donton's reserve and will not be paying for this reserve, thus, lowering 20 Corinth's demand costs. 21 22 Frady made a motion to recommend to the City Council approval of the 23 amendment to the Corinth water contract; second by Ridons. All ayes, no 24 nays, motion carried. 25 C~ r~ F t r S1 I i I r Ca~f+lh fj9/ Agenda No. 9~"OAS 4' Agenda Ilem-2S-2,,, tie ,~-fig-92 497 41~ IS ers M of caifth '44 Cart" TX 76205 (817) 20M South Cixiath Street FAX: 497.223 August 27, 1991 Mr. Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities City of Denton 216 Bast McKinney Denton, TE 76201 Dear Mr. Nelsons As per our meeting of this morning, this letter comes as a formal request that you allow the City of Corinth, under the terms of the Wholesale Water Contract, to drill one or more wells to be u► d as an alternative source of water, specifically for the purpose of satisfying the peak demand for water in high usage times during the water year. 'tentatively, Corinth would like to have the wells operational by May of 1992. I also request that the City of Denton agree that onco the wells are operational the Demand Component under the Wholesale Water Contract will be adjusted by an amount equal to, but not to exceed the comfortable production capacity of the wells once that can be determined. Please include any requirements for protection of the Denton Water System that may need to be installed by Corinth and any other r+oquirement of Denton in regard to this matter. Please let me know if further information on this subject is needed from the City of Corinth. Thank you for your consideration and cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Shirley Spellerberg, Mayor City of Corinth, Texas SS;a t Agenda No. - p--~S 99~ Agonda Ilom AN OMTJUXX Or Tlts MY 0/ p 3! AAlll~llI Vr~CTIVa ZIMO TasrkAWTr 6T 1JI&M Tu Tow IrAOI~r, . sea t+ow, 0RpAMM Tfs COMM Or Tp CZTT or DR1 TWO Tx U&MWLL Tlwe she alr~ Me a ee of tow C!t et Dater, the etes•hp tae Tssas tale • the Tove s! Corlath, Teaaa, Melsasl•, ""god rus~td Ugng: L L Th4c "d tk* tut"I'llleMteo esasieuis M eteecur $"veto; the setasheN'yMe°*~1• ase Slut thla •sAteaess .11411 bosom ottaetlw its Ps.tase aau approval. taee+ieasir up•,e lpai~~ ABM ATp chla Cheer e! J ~ gill I ar . TsLI/ A gen CITY 01 p .'TSUN DMA AOAMI DRAM"T"~CITY ATTORaaY ' 01.21 or plsYpMp~~/i •il t f~M_..~ ' Y C h '056L Awda No. Agonda ~tom_25-I e._ THE STATE OE TEXA.g ; Date -19A~ ~ / COUNTY OF DEMON I WHO ALI TED WATER CONTRACT BETWEEN CITY OF DENTON AND TOWN Oip CORINTH w This Agreement made this A._ AMY of and between the City of Denton ► 19839 by a Municipal Co oration organised under the laws of phe State of Texas (hereinafter referred to as "Denton"), and the Town Of Corinth, a Municipal Corporation organised under the general laws of the State of Texas (herein. after referred to as "Corinth"); WITNESSM: WHERE"0 Corinth desires to purchase wholesale, treated, potable water from Denton; and WRZAW, Denton desires to Make provisions to supply, trsat and deliver wholesale, treated, potable water to Corinth; NOW, THERUORZo in consideration of the mutual coveaaats and agreements herein contained the parties agree as follows; 100 Water Sales 1.1 Denton agrees to sell and deliver wholesale, treated, potable water to Corinth subject to the terms and conditions stated herein. 1.2 Corinth agrees to purchase wholesale, treated, potable water frost Denton subject to the terms and conditions stated herein. 1.3 Denton agrees to provide suificient water to meet the rate of flow and volume re4uir nts of Corinth under the terms and conditions and subject to t.. imitations stated herein. c. PAGE 1 i4 y .0s6c dganda No. -fine Agonda Ilom _2E., THE STATE OF TEXAS ! Dais~ 6 COUNTY OF DENTON ~ CONTRACT BETA TED WATER WEEN CITY OF DENTON AND TOWN OF CORINTH This Agreement made this x4ay of 1983, by and between the City of Dentoo, a Municipal Co oration organized under the laws of the State of Taxes (hereinafter referred to as "Denton"), and the Town of Corinth, a Municipal Corporation organised under the general laws of the State of Texas (herein. after referred to as "Corinth"); WITNESSETHr WHZUAS, Corinth desires to purchase wholesale, treated, potable wateL frow Denton; and WHERZA$o Denton desires to asks provisions to supply, treat and deliver wholssals, treated, potable water to Corinth; NOW, THERUORZ, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained the parties agree as follows: 1,0 Water Sa_1e , 101 Denton agrees to sell and deliver wholesale, treated, potable water to Corinth subject to the terms and conditions stated herein. 1.2 Corinth agrees to purchase wholesale, treated, potable water from Denton subject to the terms and conditions stated herein. 1.3 Denton agrees to provide suificient war,er to meet the rate of flow and volume requir +nts of Corinth under the tome and conditions and subject to t6, imitations stated herein. PACE 1 x Nonda Mo. Agonda IromT E _ NO _A:/Af 1.4 All treated, potable water that Corinth r v s from Deacon under this agreement will be untreated water that Denton purchases from the City of Dallas and treats at Denton's water treatment plant(s). Delivery of water to meet the volume and demand requirements of Corinth under this agreement are expressly subject to and limited by the available supply of water from , Dallaso and the ability of Denton to treat and deliver water, as determined by Denton. Denton shall exercise due diligence to *&sure that the supply, treatment and deliverability of water is maintained to meet Corinth's water requirements as set forth herein. Should Denton need to curtail the supply of water to its other customers, because of drought, system or delivery failure or aalfunctioa, contamination, acts of God, civil disturbances, war or other causes beyond its control, Denton may curtail the supply of water to Corinth without being is default of this agreement. 1.5 It is expressly understood that water delivered to Corinth pursuant to this agreement to contingent on water Denton purchases, or receives from the City of Dallas and this agreement does not obligate Denton to utilize any of its water rights granted to. Denton by ear regulatory agency in the furnishing of water to Corinth. 2.1 "Demand," as used herein, means the maximum daily rate of flow of water, in gallons, that would, if maintained consistently through a period of twenty-four (24) hours, provide the maximum PAGE 2 } ,rl 1 f Agenda No, 9z _4e ,s_ A ~f~ ponds Item--~--.~._..1 Dote 9-7-a ¢ quantity of water required b / y Corinth i.a any one day of year e wales . 2-2 "Volume," as used herein, means the quantity of water, in gallons, that Corinth requests Denton to supply in a water ' 2.3 "lister year,". as used herein, shall mean the, years used from June l to May Period of y 31 of the succeeding aaaual water requirements of Corinth Shall be r'detfor erminedh athe nd established. 3.0 Volume and Demand Determined for Each slater Year 3.1 Denton and Corinth agree that the delivery of water to Corinth by Denton shall be based upon the volume and demand established for each water year as set forth herein. 3.2 Not less than one hundred and twenty (120) days before the beginning date of the first and each successive water year (June 1), Corinth shall give notice to Denton, in writing, of Corinth's requested volume and demand for the first water year, and the projected volume and dsmaid for each successive water year during the tarn of this agreement. Each successive notice shall be dated, signed by representatives of both parties, and shall be attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by refer- ence' Denton aays in its sole discretion, waive the one hundred and twenty (120) day notice requirement at the request of Corinth. Such request sad waiver shall only be effective if done is writing. 3.3 Volumes requested by Corinth in each notice for any one water year, shall not be less than the volume requested in any PAGE 3 Agenda Pto, _-005' Agenda Itom.__ tyre prior water year, except where Corinth gives notice of its intent to reduce or cease taking water in accordance with 10.0. 4.0 water Ratee2 Charges and payments 4,1 The water rates to be paid by Corinth to Denton in performance of this agreament shall be 1,n an amount as established by ordinance of the City Council of Denton, and as from time to time amended. Such schedule of rates and revised rates shall be attached hereto as Exhibit "s" and incorporated herein by reference. Denton shall give Corinth ninety (90) days notice of its intent to revise existing rates for any water year. Revised rates shall become effective forty-five (43) days after passage of the ordinance establishing the revised rates. 4.2 Corinth agrees to purchase or pay during any one water yearg the greater oft (1) the vellums of water requested for that current water year, as shown on Exhibit "A"i (2) the volume of water requested to any prior water ' year, or (3) the volume of water actually used in any prior water year. 4,3 If Corinth does not require or receive all volume request- ed for a current water year as shown on Exhibit "A," where Denton was willing and able to deliver such requested volume, Corinth shall pay Denton for such volume of water requested, but not re- ceived', at the "readiness to serve" rate set forth in Exhibit "3," which shall be the Amount charged to Denton by Dallas for volumes Denton requested from Dallas on Corinth's behalf. Corinth shall \ not be obligated, in any current water year, to pay for that water 4 ~ r ~f t1 - Auenda No. '4Q Agenda Ilam_ J~ _ volume requested but not received, if such failure to receive> such volume was due to Denton's inability to deliver such water, 4,4 Corinth, for any water year, may request an increased or decreased demand from any prior water year, but the demand charge for any current water year, shall be based upon the greater oft (1) the demand for the current water year, or (2) the highest demand for any of the prior five water years during the term of this agreement. 4,3 rf Denton fails to make available the requested demand during Corinth's peak wage period for seven (7) or more consecutive days, the demand charge for such days shall be calculated by using the maxiaua rate of delivery for such days, times the current annual demand charge, divided by 3630 times the number of days of reduced flow, 4.6 If Denton fails to make available the requested demand for any current water year during the period of time from May 1 to October 31 for thirty (30) or more consecutive days, the adjusted annual demand charge for that water year shall be calculated by using the maximum rate of delivery for such days divided by the requested demand, times the current annual demand charge. 4.7 Denton stall mail or deliver monthly bills for water changes incurred by Corinth under this agreement by the tenth (loth) day of each month. Bills shall be due and payable upon receipt by Corinth and shall be considered delinquent if not paid / by the twenty-fifth (23th) day of the month, mailed or delivered. i PAGE 5 ~E IS Aganda No. Agenda llern- e [big ¢t [3L_J~ _ ~f r Denton shall charge, and Corinth agrees to percent (S%) of the total monthly bill, or Five hundred dollars ($500.00), whichever is less, for all month!Y bills not the tweet - paid by Y fifth (25th) day of the month. 448 lror all delinquent monthly water charges billed which remain unpaid after the last day of the month, Denton shall charge, and Corinth agrees to pay, in addition to the amount provided for in 4.7, interest on such unpaid balance equal to the auction average rate quoted on is sank discount basis for a 26-week treasury bill issued by the ETsty,;p~q States aovernaeat, as published by the Federal Reserve, for the week or bills are delinquent, or tea percentl$ whichever to less, bill 4.9 it to agreed that the parties, is providing for penalties or interest on delinquent amounts owed, as set forth in 4.7 and 4.8, intend to contract for a rate of interest that is not in excess of the rate allowed by law. Should, for any period of time to which 4.7 or 4.8 a " PP1y. it is determined that such interest is in excese of that allowed by law, the parties agree that such rate of interest shall not apply, but be reduced to the maximum rate allowed b)r lavo 5.0 Did fiver Locations. Met erina and Conditions 5.1 D*d too agree* to deliver the water contracted for herein at delivery point(s) as shown in Exhibit "C," attached hereto and in- corporated hereto by reference, and at any other such points as may be mutually agreed upon by both parties. The cost of acquiring,/ e PACE 6 0 Yn }V i Agenda No. Agonda Ilom E Ile -L- L~ designing, installing and constructing all water d. l2 °~'31 monitoring equipment or facilities necessary 1 very and agreement, including, but not Limited tO fulfill this points, meters, meter vaults and associatedwvaly lines to metering by Corinth ear shall be borne 4 Corinth; Provided, however, that Denton shall furnish sad install all necessary meters, tho,coats of which shall be paid by Corinth. All Plans for needed water dolivery or monitoring facilities shall conform to Denton$$ requirements and be submitte to Denton for its written a d pproval prior to iastallation. Corinth shall enter into a pro rata agreement with Denton reimbursed, on a per linear foot basis, for say connections b and be y any customer of Denton to any water lines within Denton or its extraterritorial jurisdiction, the cost of which has been paid for by Coriath and convoyed to Denton. 5.2 All water furnished shall be measured by meters installed at the point(s) of delivery. Denton agrees to maintain said meters and to cause such repairs and adjustments as ma time-to-time be necessary, to be yo from Promptly made. Such repairs shall be made at no expense to Corinth, unless it can be shown that that aeeessity for such repairs was brought about by an improper act or the negloct of Corinth. Denton agrees to test the motor(s) annually. Upon the request of Corinth, Denton shall test the meter(s) more frequently than annually, but such additional toot(s)shall be at Coriath's expense, unless an error in metering is found to be in favor of Corinth, If the mater(s) are found to be in error by more or less than two (2%) Poreant, adjustments PACE 7 ~ Y] el Y Agenda No. _-Lp,~ "QQ±? _ Agenda Ilem_ ~~_~c Rain shall be made accordingly. In the event a meter is discovered to be malfunctioning, the amount of water that has passed through the mater will be estimated for each day the mater was not functioning , correctly by taking an average of the two preceding readings of such aster(s), exclusive of readings during the time of any aal- function of the mater. 5.1 Corinth agrees that after final inspection and written acceptance of delivery facilities by Denton, Corinth will convey title of those facilities and rights of way in conjunction there- with to Denton. Upon conveyance of title to delivery facilities by appropriate instrument(s), Denton shall be respoeaible for operation and maintenance thereof. 5.4 Corinth agrees to provide ingress and egress for Denton employees and agents to all premises inside Corinth's boundaries to install, operate, iaspeet, test, and read meters and maintain facilities owned and maintained by Denton within the city limits of Corinth, 5.5 Denton agrees to provide ingress and egress for Corinth's employees and agents to all premises inside Denton's boundaries to install, operate, inspect$ teat, and maintain facilities, and read asters owned or maintained by Corilith within the city limits of Denton. 5.6 A rate-of-flow controller shall be installed at each point of delivery of water from Denton to Corinth. Such rats-o£-flow controller shall be paid for by Corinth, but all future maintenance PAGE 8 y i r it ii is Agenda No. E Agenda Item ~Y.O L or replacement costs shall be the responsibility of Denton. 5.7 Corinth shall provide sufficient ground or overhead storage and pumping facilities in accordance with the standards " and requirements of the State of Texas or its regulatory ageccias, so that Corinth can meet the water requirements of its customers lip without drawing upon Denton's water 3ystes at a greater demand in any water year than set forth in Exhibit "A." 5.8 Corinth shall receive water from Denton, either through an open discharge into a ground storage tank, or into a supply lice into the ground storage tank. Appropriate backflov prevector cheek. valves shall be placed by Corinth in the delivery liaa to assure that no flow of water from Corinth's system can return to Denton's systes. 5.9 Corinth shall abide by the service conditions for treated water customers adopted by Dallas, endorsed by Denton, as listed in 'Exhibit "D," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 6.0 Sewage Treatment and Return Flow 6.1 Delivery of water by Denton to Corinth, at the requested volume and demand for any current water year, assumes adequate sewage collection facilities to accommodate the volume and demand takeh by Corinth, Corinth agrees that, if its sewage collection facilities prove to be inadequate, Denton may decrease the volume or demand of water supplied to a level that may be accommodated by l Corinth's sewage collection system. \ i_ PArr 4 1 Agenda No. X4,5' Agenda Ifam_~,Jr„_„~~ 6.2 Corinth agrees that by Corinth water purchased by Corinth is for use , except as allowed under Section 1.0 herein. This contract coavays no rights to the rAturn w4stskster flows result- ing from the use Of water purchased hereunder, In the event Corinth develops or secure, wastewater treatment services other Denton, Corinth agrees the,. all wastewater treatment 1110 effluent discharges will be returned to the Elm Fork of the Trinity River above Lewisville Lake Da, 1.0 Resale 1ol The distribution of Denton water by Corinth shall be limited to the area within the limits of Corinth may b• Corinth, except that permitted to supply water to such specific customersor areas beyond its limits as fros time•to•time may be approved in writing by Denton, on written application from Corinth. 8.0 water 9 stp Standards and 9u 1 8.1 For the protection of the health of all consumers supplied with water from the water system of Denton, Corinth and Denton ageas to comply with State of Taxes Department of Health standards and to guard carefully against all forms of contaminatiaa to its water system, and that, if at any time Contamination should occur,' the water supply to the area or areas affected shall be immediately shut off or isolated and remain so until such conditions, shall have been abated and they water declared again We and fit for human consumption by the properly constituted governmental health agencies having jurisdiction thereof. \ i PIECE l0 ~i Nonda No. -Ogr-- Agonda Item 7E Ibto _A' 8.2 Denton expressly reserves the right to discon i us/` lt~ftpo- rarilyp after notice to Corinth, the Supply of water to any of the pipes laid or to be laid by Corinth whenever it is necessary to do so to insure proper operation of the Denton water systea, or for non-compliance with any provision of this agreement. No claims, 4 for damages for such discontinuance shall be made by Corinth against Denton. 8.3 It is understood and agreed that Corinth will not, under any circumetanees, permit water from any other source or supply to enter into its water system, or any part thereof, or to be mixed or mingled with water frog the water systea of Denton, without prior,written approval of tho Director of Utilities of Denton. 9.0 Trans ortation to Other Entities 9.1 rho purpose of this section is to recognize the benefits and encourage the cooperation of all water suppliers in the area to jointly share costs and benoUts of major water supply facilities in the interest of providing reasonable cost of water to all citizens of the area. 9.2 Denton encourages Corinth to cooperate to the exter.1t possible, to make available to other governmental entities any exeeis water transmission capacity in its water system$ for use in transportial wholesale, treated, potable water from Denton to such entity. The determination of whether excess capacity is available rests entirely with Corinth. Such excess transmissioe capacity shall be considered temporary only and shall not commit Corinth to any long-term obligation to provide such transmission capacity. c PAr.F 11 h Agonda No.. ` Agonda Itom.^ D E DxIa _Z-y:~& - 9,3 Entities utilising such temporary excess transportation capacity shall be responsible for payment of such transportation service at a rate determined by applying the general guidelines , included in Appendix "A" of Exhibit "D." 9.4 When water Lo-transportedfrom Denton to such entity using f mains, of Corinth, Denton shall collect the agreed transportation charge and credit the account of Corinth for such transportation services. 10.0 Reduction or Termination of Watar Requirements 10.1 t!, within the term of this agreement, Corinth should wish to construct and operate its own water treatment plant facilities or purchase treated water frog. another sources Corinth shall give Denton written notice of its intent to reduce or cease taking water at least five years prior to such time it will reduce or teats to take water from Denton. The notice shall specify the date that Corinth shall coats to take or receive water from f Denton, which shall be no sooner than the beginning of the fifth water year after the current water year in which such notice is given, or, it Corinth intends to reduce the volume of water it is required to take or request under this agreement, the notice shall specify the date or dates and water years when such reduction or reductions shall occur, which shall be no sooner than the beginning of the fifth water year after the current water year in which such notice is given, that Corinth intends to reduce the water requested or received and the amount of reduced volume and c PAGE 12 7. 1 r t'; is Agenda h)O. Agenda Irom_ be W10 ,.k li demand for each remaining wafer /4/ year during theterm of this agreement. 10.2 Corinth recogaizes that Denton has entered into , tern contract to a long purchase a water supply from Dallas included in such purchase, a volume of water on behalf of sad has, Corth, in order to supply Corinth with its water needs in accord•ceiwi h Chia agreement, Corinth also recognises that Denton, in order to supply Corinth and its other water customers with the volume and demand required over the term of this agraement, must incur certain capital costs so as to maintain, iaprove and expand its water pupply facilities, 10.3 Should Corinth give notice of eeas• takia its intent to reduce or g water from Deat~a under this agreement, Dent, but is not obligated to, waive or reduce at the begins ngoofsthe fifth water year altar the notice in 10,1 is Corinth's obligations to take, receive' request y or any or all of pay for water ' in accordance with this agreement, after determining to what extent Denton will be able to recoup all cosh in purchasing water and all capital costs incurred to insure delivery capability to fulfill this agreement by supplying and delivering such water to other customers. 10.4 If, in accordance with 10.39 Denton determines that such requested dLecontlau,sace or reduction in water delivery would not w in any water year allow Denton to recoup all cost and expense C incurred in insuring the water supply required by this agreement PAGE 13 4 r Agenda No, Agenda Ifopj by Oupplying other custom..., Denton shall give noti at least one year prior to such ce in writing,, time such discontinuance o,, 4 reduction of water delivery is to beaoeeffective, of tqheuesreducedC volume, if any, Deatoa shall allow h to take or re Denagretonementfor.all successive avatar Corinot from years during the remainder of Such reduced volume allowed b this is Exhibit "All attached hereto and incorporated b 11 be shown Denton aaY, but is not obligated to y reference. volume !a say successive water ' allow further reductions in years as alternative customers for such water are found. Loos If Deatoa, upon the request of Corinth that Corinth shall be alloyed to cease t 's ' agrees In writing for all or lein+ water from Denton part of the remaining water this agreement years during the terse of this agreement shall terminate and neither party shall have any further obligation to the time such water deliveries cease• other hereunder at the 11.0 Termination and 0 fsult ll.i Should Corinth fail, refuse or neglect to pay any bill for water within sixty (60) days of the data due or should it refuse, ae&lect, or fail to comply with or conditions on its perform any of the part required to be complied with or performed hareunder, and if after Ouch failure Denton shall deliver to Corinth, addressed to' the Mayor of Corinth, a notice is writing of its intent to terminate she au PP1Y of water on account of such Failure, ref:laal or neglect, then Denton shall have the right to PIE 14 r F, r\ Agenda No, Agenda Item Date -/0?- by supplying other cast /41•1 /9~ omere, Denton shall give notice in writing, at leant one year prior to reduction of water deliver such time such discontinuance ar » Y is to became effective, of the reduced volume, if any, Denton shall allow Corinth to take or request from Denson for all successive water Years during the remainder of this agreement. Such reduced volume allowed b in Exhibit "A" attached hereto a by Dear°a shall be shown and lacorporated by refarenceF Qeatoa mayo but is not obligated to volume is any sucesssive water ' allow further reductions in years as alternative customers for such water are found. Loos If DeatOn, upon the request of Corinth # that Corinth shall be allowed to oeaae takin ► green is writing for all or part of the r g water from Denton emaining water years during the term of this agreement, this agreement shall terminate and neither shall have any further obligation to the party other hereunder at the A time such water deliveries crass, 11,0 Termination and Default 11.1 Should Corinth fail, refuse for water or nsgle0t to pay any bill within sixty (60) days of the data due or should it refw e► aegiecr, or fail to comply conditions on its with or perform any of the Part required to be complied with or performed herstinder, and if after such failure Denton shall deliver to Corinth, addressed to the Mayor of Corinth, a notice in writing of l its intent to terminate the supply of water on accoun of tai refusal or neglect, then Denton shall havethetrightuto PAIR 14 y 5G' Y Agenda No.. -OG,S Agenda ggem. terminate the water supply at the expiration of to 0 {i0 Oday~ after the giving of such notice and to terminate this agreement, unless within such tea (10) days Corinth shall make good such failure, refusal or neglect. The termination of water service or torsination of this agreement, ae provided hernia, shall not release Corinth from its obligation to make payments of any amounts due or to bocce* dun in accordance with the terms hereof. 12.0 Force Maisure ILL If, because of flood, drought, fire, explosions, civil disturbance, war, water system failure or aalfunotion, acts of Cod, or other causes beyond the control of either party, either pasty is not able to perform any or all of its obligations under this agreement, then the respective parties' obligations hereunder shall be suspended during such period. 13.0 Liability and Claims 13.1 No claims shall be made by either party hereto against the other and neither shall be liable to the other for any damages or loss of any kind resulting From the interruption, curtailment or reduction of the supply of water, or for the failure to receive or pay for requested water not received, which results from the causes listed in 1.4, 6.1, 8.1, 11.1, or 12.0 of this agreement. 13.2 Denton agrees to hold hRrmlose and defend Corinth, its officers and employees, from any claim for injuriss, damages or losses that arises from any act, omission or negligence of Denton, its officers or employees, arising from the performance of this agreement. PAGE 15 ~i r N. AgondaNo, Agenda lom-161 Mlo -.I:...AAG -fA 13.1 Corinth agrees to hold harmless and defend Den oR 0?/ officers and employees, from as ► its any claims for injuries, damaged or losses that arises from an ' Y act, oaiasian or negligence of Corinth, its officers or employees, arising from the performance of this agreement., 14.0 Applicable Laws and Regulations 14.1 This agreement is made and shall be subject to the laws of the United States and the State of Texas and all applicable regulations or rules of any regulatory authority thereof having jurisdiction of the subject matter of this agreement. 14.2 Should this agreament, or any provision, thereof be, or found to be, in violation of any such applicable law or rsgulaeion, either party, upon reasonable notice to the other, may terminate this agreement, or, upon the mutual consent of each party, this agreement may be amended so as to be in compliance with such law or regulationa 1540 No Verbal Agreement 15.1 This contract contains 411 commitments and agreements of the parties hereto and no verbal or written commitments shall have any forcer or effect if not contained herein. 16.0 Secefition Parties 16.1 This agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the respective parties hereto, their successors and asaigas. PACE 16 Agenda No. Agenda 118R/I_~~e-__ W10 17.0 Prior Agreements or Service 17.1 This agreement shall suporcede and control over any prior agreements or understanding, whether written or verbal, concerning { the supply of water by Denton to Corinth except as otherwise provided for heroic.. 18.0 Effective Date 18.1 This agreement shall become effective for the first water year beginning Jun* 1, 1986, provided, however, that the water rates provided for in 4.0 and the requirement of the ::ustallatioa of a rate-of-flow controller provided for to 5.60 shall not becommV ^ effective until the earlier date of either! (1) the date Corinth notifies Denton of the completion of its water storage facilities, such notification to be given within 20 days after actual completion; or. (2) June 1, 1987. 18.1 It is agreed that Denton shall continue to provide water to .:orinth under the existing supply contract until the beginning { of the first water year specified herein, irrespective of any volume or demand limitations contained in such existing contract. Corinth agrees it will pay water rates currently established by Denton, including a surcharge established by Denton on all volumes of water over three million (300000000) gallons per mouth supplied to Corinth during the period of May 1 to October 310 until the beginning of the first water year on June 1. 1986t at which such time the provisions of this agreement shall apply. i„ PACE 17 F kj I Agonda No. Agonda Itom..~L?.Z.1..~__._ 19.0 Term. Dine 19.1 This agreement shall be effective from June 199%, to June 10 2006, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions contained herein or upon the mutual consent of both part ism0 0 IN WXTNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agree. meat to be executed by their respective duly-authorized officers in multiple originals as of the date and year first above written. ,r CITY Or DENTON, TEXAS Sys i ATTEST: / 4AA A P 1Z OT y ~Wjo 0- Q r CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OE DENTON, TEXAS By t r/ larve TOWN OF CORINTR, TEXAS ~..~a. BY: k. SHIKLET OWN OF ORINTH, TEXAS 'G ATTEST : CI'T'Y SECS3i?OTO TOWN Of C011M, TEXAS PAGE: 18 w, iF } 4 Mhl{11I I { f~ REQUESTED VOLUMES 4 DEMANDS FOR MATER YEARS ~ ANNUAL MATER AVG DAILY DEMAND WATER VOLUME REQUESTED USAGE REQUEST I YES.. (MG) MGD kGD enda No• L Agenda Ilom 1429 " 4 7ur -1990 _ 200.75 M 550 I 1.2 MGM 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1991 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 zoos 2006 CITY OF DBNTON BY DA s ATTISTs TOWN OF CORINTH BY BATS ATTEST: 3617U cv r, f. U '1: 9*1 MATBA SAL* FOA RASALA' TO ' GOVB»1tMINTAL AGENCIM Effective Date D It A F T DIVISIONS OR SUBDIVISIONS IN I I Ordinance 0 ss. ` I Article It Cha ter 25 SCHEDULA 13 31U U-12• DRAFT T _ APPLICATION Applicable to all govornaental agenciesp divisionst subdivisions for distribution and resale of water supplied at points of delivery and , measured through one meter and with appropriate rate of flow controllers. Not t livable for temporary, standby, or supplementary service except n con uact on with applicable-rider. NET MONTHLY RATA 1) Facility Coarse $150.00 Z) Demand Coarse Annual $60,141/4501000 gal/peals demand or .!!thly $12.41/1000 gal/peak demand ^2) Volume Coarse $.63/1000 sale. Readiness to serve $.3672/1000 sale. MINIMUM SILLINO $1SQ.00 per month PA 114ENT Denton shall render bills on the tenth (10th) day of each month delivered to the Tows Clerk of Corinth. Bills shall be due and payable ° whom rendered# tills are considered delinquent if not paid by the twent~r-fifth ((25th) of the month. There shall be a five (51) percent or five-hundred ($300) dollar char e, whichever is less* addod eo the bill if not paid by the twouty•t'ifth 25th) of the month. All' delis"out balances remaining unpaid after the lai1t day of each month and for each month thereafter shall be subject to %a additional interest charge based on the current Treasury Bill interest rate. Such interest charge shall be applied to all delinquent bills until paid. Mater service may be disconnected it any bill is not paid within sixty (60) days. Corinth hereby waives any and all claims for damages resulting from such discontinuance of service. DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Agonda No, vg Agenda yJ~i ` 4 ~5 h F. i is - r. .ac ar s~ suwewa Z♦IffAL AGSNCf DIVISIONS OA SaIDIVIStONd a Ordiaanco d gs• s fff (Coat' d) Article II Chapter SC~IIL! M,} 3714 7U.13 •D_ RAyFT FR.,_4_RATtON OF UTILITY BILLS a) Billing maily. for the Facility anssuall char=~ shall be based on 12 billings Formulas Actual ds s la rradin rlod : Facility Charge b) Billing for the Demand Charge shall be based oa 12 billings aaausl y. Formulas Actual days is reading period x Demand Charge Agenda No. DQ,~ Agenda Item n~ n~ D31a - -"1~_"Q~ DUTOM MUNICIPAL UTILITIES r' I; A91.._~frvA J / I•I , • , Via Agenda No. wl 1•.~..~ Agenda•kaw, • `n ,y. , , I I C1 ~ f 01 OJT- I 01 t ~ .M / • I 1 A I t Iw.M M ti, ,1 • y ,r % j. 1 ; IS, Pew . I 10 11 4 It\ . I A ' ' • l'OftllY - . ' Ir 07 F',• I - _ I • , J I LAO. •,••u: 00 • i \ 40, 7 0, c i corInth.0 Agonda No. Agenda 11om i !kilo ORDINANCE NO. ry T AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO A WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE TOWN OF CORINTH, TEXAS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the Mayor is authorized to execute the g attached amendment to a wholesale water supply agreement dated May 19, 1985 between the City of Denton and the Town of Corinth, Texas under the terms and conditions contained within said amendment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. _9~FCTION II. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY, APPROVED AS TO LFaAL FORMS DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: r sti 6 . Agenda No. 92~DO ~ N Agondo 11 mils-M- Vito~~ .71 AMENDMENT OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AND THE TOW14 OF CORINTH, TEXAS Recitals On May 14, 1965 the City of Denton (Denton) and the Town of Corinth (Corinth) entered into an agreement (the Contract), a copy of which is attached, providing for Denton to supply wholesale treated water to Corinth. For the water year 1991 (June 1, 1991 to May 31, 1992), Corinth's requested demand was established at, 1,250,000 gallons per day (1.25 MGD). Corinth is now proposing to provide for peak water demand by drilling one or more water wells to serve its water supply system and would like to reduce its demand below what would otherwise be required under the Contract. Denton is agreeable to allowing for a reduction in demand in consideration of Corinth committing itself to ultimately obtaining its wholesale water supply from the Ypper Trinity Regional Water District or some water supply source other than the City of Denton. AGREEMENT The parties agree to amend the Contract as follows: 1. That paragraph 2.3 ("Water Year") is amended to read as follows: 2.3 "Water Year" shall mean the period of time from June 1 to May 31 of the succeeding year, for which the annual water requirements of Corinth shall be determined and established, except as otherwise provided for in this Contract. 2. That Section 3.0 ("Volume and Demand Determined for Each Water Year"), is amended by adding a new paragraph 3.4. to read as follows: 3.4. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section 3.0, beginning on October 11 1992, Corinth's requested demand shall be set at 1,000,000 gallons per day (1.00 MGD) and shall remain at that level until September 30, 1993. At least 120 days prior to October 1, 1993, Corinth shall make its written request for demand for the period of time from October 1, 1993 to May 31, 1994, but the requested demand shall not be less than 750,000 gallons per day (0.75 MGD). The demand as requested by Corinth for the period of time from October 1, 1993 to May 31, 1994, shall establish the demand Denton will make available to Corinth for water year 1994 and each water year thereafter. M1 i Agenda ND. Agenda ltem_&~- Wie .'161P 32. Paragraph 4.4 is amended to read as follows: 4.4. Corinth shall pay the demand charge established by ordinance on the specified demand in accordance with the following schedule: Demand June 1, 1991, to September 30, 1992 1.25 MGD October 1, 1992, to September 30, 1993 1.00 MGD October 1, 1993, to May 31, 1994 As requested Beginning with the 1994 water year (June It 1994, to May 31, 1995), the demand charge for that water year and all subsequent water years shall be based on the demand requested for the period of time from October 1, 1993, to May 31, 1994. 3. Paragraph 4.6 is amended to read as follows: M?'? 4.6 If Denton fails to make available the requested demand that applies to a water year during the period of time from June 1 to September 30 for thirty (30) or more consecutive days, the adjusted annual demand charge for that water year shall be calculated by using the maximum rate of delivery for such days divided by the requested demand, times the current annual demand charge. 4. This amendment shall take effect on , 1992. Signed 1992. CITY OF DENTON BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR a ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON BY: PAGE 2 v; f I Agenda No. '"dds _ Agenda Item It E ~~-F-5 209-.1 I)RID APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:' DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY UUU CITY OF DENTON BY b • TOWN OF CORINTH, TEXAS ^rf'~ SHIRLEY SPE LER ERGO MAYOP ATTEST: CITY SEC ARY, TOWN OF CORINTH, TEXAS 1 A 109121C PAGE 3 ii ti +r CITY COUNCIL I Id I It L. 1 1 ri Y TT I IF[ it TTTT oaoooonaaa o000 - O~OO { B H 6QQQQ dD C~ b ~ -4-F QQ H ti III~ll ITT f-~ Y~ F _ r.L~rw.J YT P (j ~i CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 1gonda No P,(jmda K°m- 5~.. T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Resolutions for City of Denton Smoke-Free Workplace and Use of Smokeless Tobacco Products Policies which will replace Policy 108.03, Smoking Policy. RECOMMENDATION: k It is the staff's recommendation to adopt a resolution implementing two new policies: "Smoke-Free Workplace" (108,03A) and "Use of Smokeless Tobacco Products'' (108.03B) in place of the current "Use of Smoking and Smokeless Tobacco" policy (108.03). SUMMARY: The City of Denton is concerned about the health and wellness of its employees and customers. It would be in the beat interest of all employees to implement a smoke-free work environment. Therefore, it is necessary to have and enforce a policy that will prevent non-smokers from being affected by environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). In addition, it is the staff's recommendation to retain the current policy's section regarding use of smokeless tobacco products (108.03). BACKGROUND: The Surgeon General has called smoking "the single most preventable cause of death" in the United States. It has been reported that "smoking is responsible for morn than 1 in every 6 deaths in the United States each year." Research in the last 10 years has established that involuntary smoking is a cause of disease, including lung cancer, in healthy non-smokers. The National Research council estimates that in a given year, from 2,490 to 5,160 non-smokers may have died from environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). The current city of Denton Smoking Policy (108.03) was approved by City Council in January , 1987. From 1987 through 1990 a number of complaints, due to health reasons, were received in the Personnel Department. In 1990, Personnel pulsed the organization to determine the Smoking Policy's effectiveness. The response revealed that 58% felt that the policy was not working. In 1991 two alternative policies were dr,\fted. These were reviewed by the Executive Committee, Wellness Committee, Policy Committee as well as all employees for feedback. Considering all responses and feedback these two policies, "Smoke-Free Workplace" and "Use of 5J~ YA s, ~ Njenda No. 1 Argonda Item_ila- Utlh _ City Council Report Format. Smoke-Free Workplace and Use Smokeless Tobacco Products' '2 g February 4, 1992 Smokeless Tobacco Products', were proposed and reviewed. The Smoke-Free Workplace policy (Attachment A) provides for the following: Smoking is prohibited in City of Denton vehicles unless permission is expressly obtained in advance from all other passengers; and the use of smoking tobacco products is prohibited within any municipal facility of the City of Denton with the following exceptions: 1) Suspects and witnesses may smoke in designated areas of the Police Department during interviews and interrogations. 2) Smoking is permitted in a designated area of the jail for inmates only. The Use of Smokeless Tobacco Products (Attachment B)policy states that in all office environments, enclosed work facilities, and areas where sanitation is a concern, smokeless tobacco products are prohibited. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS. OR GROUPS AFFECTED: These two policies affect all employees. FISCAL IMPACT: None Resp tfull'lJy s itted: 1 yd V. Harrell city manager Pared by: L~ Thoma~'~r U- hck, D rector Personn 1/Employee Relations Appro Bet Kea , ecu ve D rector Municipal Sex es/Economic Development C_ T gkg t' I p Y, e1Mpdocs\Sobacco.f4!6 Agenda No, Agenda llnom 1a RESOLUTION NO. 18 ~ 3 f A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVING REVISED CITY POLICIES REGULATING SMOKING AND THE USE OF SMOKELESS TOBACCO PRODUCTS BY CITY EMPLOYEES; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, The City of Denton, Texas is concerned for the health and well-being of its employees, both tobacco users and nonusers; and WHEREAS, the Director of the Personnel/Employee Relations Department for the City of Denton has presented a proposed policy regarding employee rules and regulations for the Council's consid- eration; and WHEREAS, the City Council, upon the recommendation of the City Manager, desires to adopt such policy as an official policy regarding employment with the City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION I,, That City of Denton Policies, numbered 108.03A and 108.03B attached hereto and Incorporated by reference herein, are hereby approved as official policies of the City of Denton, Texas, and replace former policy 108.03. SECTION II. That the foregoing policy is attached hereto and make a part hereof and shall be filed in the official records with the City Secretary. SECTION 111 That the Employee Rules and Regulations of 1976 adopted by Resolution of the City Council on February 1, 1977, are hereby rescinded to the extent they conflict with the foregoing policy and with any administrative procedures and directives issued under the authority of the City Manager implementing thr, policy hereby adopted. SECTION IV. That this resolution shall become effective on June 1, 1992. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR i f. e 5 1i) t ATTEST: agenda No. JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY Apidailoni BY: c APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCa CITY ATTORNEY BY e c • hr If i~ Pganda No. C+nerit A Aflond3Ilan. Q` S CITY OF DETMN PAOE_;~_OF__. Uale .,e2 POLICY/ADMIIiIBTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINIBTRATIVE DIRECTIVE g REFERENCE NUMBER: SECTIONS PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 308.03A EFFECTIVE DATEI SUBJECT: STANDARDS OF CONDUCT L16/01/92 REPLACESi TITLE: SMOKE -FREE WORKPLACE 108.03 a 1. POLICY STATEMENT? The City of Denton desiren to conduct its operations with the utmost regard for the safety of its employees, its customers, and the public. One of the most valuable assets of the City of Denton is its tee theemploth, workforce. In recognition of that belief, the City promotes v~ safety, and well-being of each individual through progressive health and benefit programs. Because the City's obligation includes concern for all employees in all areas of carcinogen known azto scause disease, environmental tobacco in o healthy non-smokers, well as eyes, coughing g lead to impaired performance and increased health care ooetej it is therefore the poliay of the City of Denton to limit use of smoking tobacco products to certain areas designated by the City Manager as outlined in Administrative Directive. II. DEFINITIONS "Municipal Facility" means any building or structure owned or operated by the City of Denton. "Open air vehicle means ah of risooperated b the l acing passengerstfron Denton which, by its design, r is incapable the free flow of outside air. "Smoking" means the combustion of any product or material containing tobacco. "Vehicle" means any car, truck, bus, or n owned or i rut d by the City of Denton, used for conveying persons, supPline equipment, III. ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE A. The use of facility of the tobacco City of Denton with the products is rohibited within any municipal designated areas of the may 1 Department s during witnesses iews and interrogations. Police not smoke in these areas at any time. 2. Smoking is permitted in a designated area of the jail. 3. Employees may smoke outdoors during their normal break periods and at meal periods. ~v .,i si Agonda Na' DO Agenda llom__ 5 6 Q PAOI~ oF~~ _ 6 O POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVr PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (continued) TITLEi REFERENCE NUMBERi SMOKE-FREE WORKPLACE 108.03A B. The use of tobacco products is rrohibited in the City of Denton vehicles unless permission is expressly obtained in advance from all passengers. C. The Superintendent of Building operations shall conspicuously place "No smoking" signs at the main entrance of all municipal facilities, and shall additionally place signs designating authorized smoking areas in the Police Department. D. Employees will be allowed to smoke outside the facilities during their normal break period and lunch. E. Any employee who smokes or otherwise uses tobacco products in violation of this policy is subject to disciplinary action as outlined in Policy 109.01 Diocinlinarv Action. F. City employees who experience performance or personal difficulties while overcoming a nicotine addiction may seek help through the City's health insurance program or Employee Assistance Program (SAP), outlined in Policy 107.10 Emoloves Assistance Program. Interested employees or supervisors may contact a representative of the Personnel /Employee Relations Department for assistance. AAA00101 v. h ATTACHMENT B Agenda No. r~ del CITY OF DENTON Agonda Date __RS'[. PAOe~OR ~ 8OLICY ADKINISTRATIVE PROCBDVRE/ADxrxi8TRAT17E RIC VR SBCTION: REFERENCE NUMM PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 108.038 SUSIBCr, EFFECTIVE DATE: STANDARDS OF CONDUCT 06/01/92 TIRE: REPLACES: r USE OF SMOXELESS TOBACCO PRODUCTS 308.03 1. POLICY STATEMENTt The use of smokeless tobacco is offensive to many people, citizens and co- 40 workers alike. A work environment in which employees are allowed to use smokeless tobacco products promotes an image which many regard as unsanitary and unprofessional. It is therefore the policy of the city of Denton, Texas to permit the use of smokeless tobacco products by City employees only in areas designated by the City Manager to minimize the possibility that others will be offended by an employee's use of these products. II. DEFINITIONS "Smokeless Tobacco Products" means any p; )duct or preparation containing tobacco, including chewing tobacco, snuff, and smokeless tobacco, but not including cigarettes, cigars, or pipe tobacco. III. ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE A. Prohibited Areas 1. The use of smokeless tobacco products is prohibited,in the W.lowing designated areas of municipal facilities, a. All office environments. b. Enclosed work facilities. c. Areas where sanitation is a problem or concern, as designated by the area supervisor. S. Permitted areas. 1. In areas of municipal facilities where the use of smokeless tobacco products is not otherwise prohibited, the preference of the people in the area shall dictate whether such use is permitted in that area. 2. Notwithstanding the designation of any permitted area, an employee shall not use smokeless tobacco products unless he or she has first asked for and obtained the unanimous consent of all persons in that area. C. An employee shall responsibly dispose of all waste products generated by his or her use of smokeless tobacco products. Notwithstanding any other provision of this policy allowing the use of smokeless tobacco producte, a supervisor may prohibit the use of smokeless tobacco products in any area where employees fail to responsibly dispose of waste products generated by the use of smokeless tobacco products. i M s 1 I t PAol~2_Olr_ 2 POLICY ADXXW10TRATIVE PROCEDURE "XXXISTRAT.M DIRYSCTIVI (Continued) REFEMCB NVMM: rms: U91 OT SMOKILM TOBACCO PRODUCTS 108.033 D. Any employee who uses tobacco products in violation of this policy or its dirsotives during working hours or while upon any municipal fao-.Iity is subieot to disciplinary action as outlined in Policy 109.01 Rijgj231a3aC Action. E. City employees who experience performance or personal difficulties while breaking a nicotine addiction may seek help through the City's health insurance program or Employee Assistance Program (RAP), as outlined in Policy o 107.10 Emolovee Ass st Mq Pr4_grsm. Interested employees or supervisors may ccntact a representative of the Personnel/Employee Relations Department for assistance. IV. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE Supervisors are responsible for communicating this policy to, and enforcing the policy upon, their subordinates. The preference of any person offended by the nnot be reached. Any shall be a probleminoompif a lainttuor use of agreement smokeless concern with the enforcement of this policy and directive is encouraged to utilize the procedures outlined in Policy 115.02 "Problem Solvinq". Agenda No. Le-- Agenda Item_R5 Aanuo28C C. i! :a CITY COUNCIL FIFT ~pppp~OQQ pp0 OOOOO~y a r c e ~oOOOp~ _ 0 o ~ ~ m o a O e~ , OQ O ~O c a c carp°°°°~ a 4. ` 1 4 r ~ E. r 1 CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM r Agenda No. Aoonda llem_ 8 b DATE: February 18, 1992 [)die ~2 -f g Z TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: GTE EXTENDED AREA SERVICE s SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION 00 On January 7, the City Council received a report from Mr, Melvin Willis, GTE Facilities Manager, on a proposed optional Extended ! Area Service. Extended Area Service (EAS) will allow Denton residents to call surrounding GTE exchanges without having to pay long distance tolls. The City Council approved the EAS concept and directed staff to prepare a resolution. The GTE EAS will provide two-way, flat-rate service to the following exchanges: DFW Airport Garland Grapevine Irving Keller Lewisville Plano Rowlett Wylie Carrollton Lake Dallas Justin Argyle Bartonville Denton EAS is scheduled to begin this summer afcer Public Utilities commission review and approval. Staff recommends that Council adopt a resolution approving Extended Area Service for the Denton area and authorizing the Mayor to sign , all necessary documents. Prepared by: u Nava, Jr. " Ass tant to the C Manager Apprav d by/; 1 yd V. Harrell City Manager C Y. <.tl y I `I gto.r Agenda No. nc~enda uo_m_I_~fL~1pz~-_~~ - X1.111: RESOLUTION NO. •r2 417, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON APPROVING THE GTE SOUTHWEST EXTENDED AREA SERVICE FOR THE DENTON EXCHANGE AND AUTH01ZIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS WHEREAS GTE Southwest Incorporated provides local exchange service to the Argyle, Bartonville, Justin and Denton exchanges and is seeking to enhance the telephone communications capabilities of the citizens of Denton by providing extended area service; and WHEREAS, each of these exchanges is seeking approval from the Public Utility Commission of Texas for extended area service to each other and the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex areal and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the concept of extended area service for the Denton exchange at the city Council Work- session of January 7, 1992; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION I. That the City Council hereby approves the GTE Extended Area Service concept. SECTION II. That the Mayor is authorized to sign all neces- sary documents establishing Extended Area Service as an optional service for the citizens of Denton. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of, 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: C R1. . r.