Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-21-1992 agenda No. L Agertda AGENDA Date 1 2-/ACITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL January 21, 1992 p Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, January t 21, 1992 at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: NOTE: Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may also be considered as part of the Agenda for the Regular session. 5:15 p.m. ° 1. Presentation and discussion of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, the single Audit, and the Management Letter for the year ended September 30, 1991. 2. Receive a report and hold a discussion on recommended building renovations and give approval of a priority list. 3. Receive a report and hold a discussion on proposed "Smoke Free Workplace" and proposed "Use of Smokeless Tobacco Products• policies and give staff direction, 4. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding bridge conditions in the City of Denton and possible funding alternatives and give staff direction. 5. Executive Session: As Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Consider action in City of Denton v. Tri-Steel structures. Inc. B. Real Estate Under Sec. ?.(f), Art, 1252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec, 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, January 210 1992 at 7:00 p.m, in the Council chambers of City Hall., 215 E, McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: 7:00 p.m, 1. Pledge of Allegiance l A r1 Agenda tM. 'Oda Agenda Item._._ City of Denton City Council Agenda Uale January 21, 1992 Page 2 2. Resolutions of Appreciation A. Consider approval of a resolution of appreciation for Murl Calvert. B. Consider approval of a resolution of appreciation for Ike Splawn. 3. Citizen Reports A. Rece.iv a citizen report from a representative of the Youth In Government Program. 4. Public Hearings A. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance approving a detailed plan for a portion of Planned Development No. 72 for the purpose of a retail grocery store on a 4.116 acre tract of land located at the southeast corner of N. Locust Street and Windsor, adjacent to Strickland Junior High School. Z-91-021 (The Planning and zoning Commission recommended approval 5-1 at their meeting of January 8, 1992.) B. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance rezoning a 19.8 acre tract of land from the Planned Development District (PD 95) to the Single Family Residential (SF-16) district on property located on the east side of Hinkle Drive between the Denton Center. Shopping Facility and the Good Samaritan Village. Z-91- ' 019 (The Planning and zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0 at their meeting of December 11, 1991.) C. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance approving a Specific Use Permit on a 4.82 acre trivet of land located on the east side of Hinkle, directly behind the Denton center shopping Facility, for the purpose of a personal health facility. Z-91-020 (The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval 6-0 at their meeting of December 11, 1991.) 4s n i; b Agenda No. City of Denton City Council. Agenda Ag°ntlRllzrn. %W January 21, 1992 Page 3 _ ~ ~ A9 to D. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance rezoning a .7675 acre tract of land from the Planned Development (PD-1,0) and Single Family Residential (SF-7) Districts to the Multifamily-1 (MF-1) District on property located at the southeast corner of Bell Avenue and Withers Street. Z-91-418 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0 at their meeting of December 11, 1991.) " E. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance approving the rezoning of a 1.63 acre tract of land from the Single Family Residential (SF-10) District. to the Planned Development District and approve a detailed plan for medical offices and accessory uses on property located on the east side of Bonnie Brae, approximately 800 feet south of University Drive. 2-91- 017 (The Planning and Zoning Commission re=,..nended approval 4-2 at their meeting of December 11, 19?1 F. Hold a public hearing and consider the preliminary and final replat of Lots 15 and 16, Block 4, Hillside Addition; into Lots 15A and 16A. The .312 acre site is located at the southwest corner of Fannin and Bernard Streets. P-91-028 (The Planning and Zojiing Commission recomm.~ided approval 6-0 at their meeting of January 8, 1992.) G. Hold a public hearing and consider an ordinance amending ordinance number 91-101 concerning sign rovIew criteria and process for PD 142, Hillcrest. PD 142, HJ.llcrest, is 245 acres in size and is located east of IH-35N and along IH 35 from Highway 77, Loop 288. Z-91-022 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0 at their January 8, 1992 meeting.) 5. Consent Agenda. Each of these items is recommended by the staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval. of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. F Agenda No. City of Denton City Council Agenda ayeiida Item-^ January 21, 1992 Dale Page 4 Listed below are bids and purchases orders to be approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back- up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 6.A, 6.B, 6.C, 6.D, 6.E). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss or withdraw an item ° prior to approval of the Consent Agenda. A. Bids and Purchase orders: 1. Bid #1308 - Two Man Aerial Device 00 2. Bid #1313 - Truck Cab and Chassis 3. Bid #1322 - Container Grown Trees 4. Bid #1303 - Belt Filter Presses 5. Bid #1316 - Single Stage Centrifugal Blowers 6. Bid #1321 - Arco Concrete Foundation 7. P.O. #21937 - Rone Engineers 8. P.O. #21938 - Traffic Engineering and Controls, Inc. 9. P.O. #21468 - J & S Equipment B. Plats and Replats 1. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of the Food Lion T-2 Addition; Lot 1, Block 1. The 4.116 acre site is located at the southeast corner of Locust Street and Windsor Drive. P-91-029 (The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval 6-0 at their meeting of January 8, 1992.) 6. ordinances A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting a competitive sealed proposal and awarding a contract for purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. (5.A.1. - Bid #1308, 5.A.2. - Bid #1313, 5.A.3. - Bid #1322, 5.A.4. - Bid #1303, 5.A.5. - Bid #1316) B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements, (5.A.6. - #1321) C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. (5.A.9 - P.O. #21468) C x i~ {j i `k 7i Agenda No, Agenda City of Denton City Council Agenda {h1e~-(~~, January 21, 1992 Page 5 D. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for purchases of materials or equipment which are available from one source in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. (5.A.8. - P.O. #21938) E. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement with Rona Engineers, Inc. for professional engineering services relating to an earth electrical resistivity survey at the Denton Sanitary Landfill; and authorizing the expenditure of funds therefor. (5.A.7. - P.O. #21937) F. Consider adoptions of an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute an easement from the City of Denton to GTE Southwest Incorporated. G. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending Article II of Division It of Chapter 25 ("Streets, Sidewalks and Public Places") of the Code of ordinances to require abutting owners to repair defective sidewalks; making abutting property owners liable for injuries caused by defective sidewalks; providing for the fixing of a lien for the cost of repair; and providing for a penalty in the maximum amount of $500.00. H. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending chapter 1.0 of the Code of ordinances to prohibit certain contracts with former council members for a certain period. 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance directing the publication of notice of intention to issue City of , Denton Utility System Revenue Bonds, and directing the issuance and publication of notice of sale of said bonds. 0. Consider adoption of an ordinance directing the issuance and publication of notice Of sale of city of Denton General Obligation Bonds. 7. Resolutions A. Consider approval of a resolution adopting a new Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program for the Denton Municipal Airport. (The Airport Advisory Board recommends approval.) t t ~t ,I l~ >1~ Agenda Itom City of Denton City Council Agenda Rite January 21, 1992 Page 6 81 Consider approval of an extension of a sanitary sewer line adjacent to the Municipal Airport. 9. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. 4 10. Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate ; C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 11. New Business This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 12. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. NOTE: THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT IS LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE. C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of (P.m.) , 1992 at o'clock (a.m.) ACC00030 -CITY SECRETARY i. #I a 3 * 'f - :C I'C'Y -COUNCIL - - - - - - - - - - - - ooo~aoUUUIU o oo~ O { ^ oOpO. Q ? . O~ f: 44 'R r L i - CITY C4UNCIL, r- 9 S t t- F- i r ooooa ooaoaoovooo 00 { F .v r o00 ooo; o o ~ r 0 0 d 41 tt+ N r F. CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT VIS TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager Nonda No. _ - - SUBJECT: General Fund Building Renovations AgonddHam_-s~•----- Dille RECOMMENDATION: After review by the Mayor and Members of the City CoudcYii, staff recommends that we proceed with the program of completing the first 32 projects on the attached List. SUMMARY: Once staff receives permission to sell the bonds and to proceed with project completion, Bruce llenington will begin completing the projects one at a time. Completion of all projects is expected sometime in 1993. BACKGROUND: In this year's budget process, the Council allowed a small tax increase in order to purchase Debt Service Bonds. This increase will allow us to complete approximately $696,000 worth of renovation projects to our aging, buildings. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Almost all General Fund departments. FISCAL IMPACT: Will spend approximately 0696,000 in bond funds orovrldod by the sale of certificates of obligation. RE,ZUr,LY SUBMi'PTED: 1 d V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: 4-u~ N' me Bruce Heningto Title Superintendent of Paellit:y Management Approved: A--- Name y p Mean Title Fxecutive Director for Municipal Services/ / Economic Development ~v t C Agooda No. ~ Ayonda ltom. _W$ 2 _ city of DENTON, TEXAN MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MaKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 M E M O R A N D U M 4 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM., Bruce Henington, Superintendent of Facility Management DATE: January 16, 1992 SUBJECT: General Fund Renovations We would like to review with you the final list of renovations. The updated list describes the project, gives the preliminary ballpark cost estimate that was given to you last summer and the currant quotes, shows the ranking by number, the life of the project, whether it is a maintenance item or a new renovation, and a cumulative total with a cutoff of approximately $696,000. We will be able to creatively fund these projects through bond monies and as a result will be able to complete approximately 39 projects, However, the use of bond monies does not allow us to finance the smaller maintenance projects, i.e. painting. These items will be reviewed for completion within this yearts maintenance budget. Any small projects that cannot be completed this year will be submitted as supplemental packages for review in A next year's budget. We will have a short video of the Library roof. The sidewalk project has colored maps that show the sidewalks that are the most critically in need of replacement. Please review this information, and if you have any questions, please give me a call' at 566-8270. C Alj,~-V , ce Hen ng on Attachments AJJ001AA l~ C~. 81715668200 D/FW METRO 434.2519 inV s 7 January 16, 1992 Agenda No. Z ~l N=New Agonda Uo-m M = Maintenance Dais C _ Complete or in process of completion UPDATED PROJECT LIST Proposed Amount Estimated Cumulative Life of Banking ne 1 Project Cost ^Total _ ro'ect 1. N $20,000 New Denia Floor $ 15,013 $ 15,013 10 yrs, (Complete New Vinyl Floor) 2. N $3.5,000 New Electrical Panels $ 10,868 $ 25,881 15 yrs. (City Hall) 5 total C $16,000 New Roof station #4 -------completed----- 15 yrs. 3. N $ 6,600 New Security Lighting $ 61547 $ 32,428 15 yrs. Visual Arts Building (Exterior front door) 4. N $21,500 New Restroom Partitions $ 16,767 $ 49,195 15 yrs. (Civic Center, City Hall, Library) C $ 4,500 Ion Smoke Eaters -------smoking Policy— 5. N $58,000 Security Fire System $ 27,500 $ 76,695 15 yrs. City Hall (b.c.d) a. Security Card system $30,000-computerized b. Fire/Smoke Detector (basic system-wired to the Police Department $12,000 (6,000 + 6,000) r„ Door Handicap Push Bars $12,000 on all exterior doors d. Automatic Door ADA Courtyard entry $3,500 6. N $32,000 Visual Arts Window Replacement $ 36,240 $112,935 10 yrs. a. New metal frames (b) 15 yrs. $62,000 b. Rebuild wood/paint 10 yrs. $36,240 (treated wood) 7. N $43,000 Civic Center Renovation $ 17,040 $129,975 15 yrs. a. New sound equipment (a.c.d.) 15 yrs. $ 3,500 b. Interior paint (M) -----------drops out--------- $10, 000 c. Renovate restrooms 15 yrs. $10,040 (4 toilets) ADA d. New Handicap door/exterior 15 yrs. $ 3,500 C 4. c .`ri 'a . YYrQ11{ ,n { Agenda No. f0~, w January 16, 1992 Aponda Icon' Z Page 2 Date I gg Proposed Amount Estimated Cu ulat Life of Ranking Junes Projects Cost Total Project 8, N $ 40200 New A/C Police (Radio Room 3rd Floor $ 41200 $134,175 10 yrs. 9. N $ 12,000 New A/C Civic Center $ 61500 $140,675 10 yrs. back offices 10. N $ 35,000 New Nette Schultz courts-(cost of concrete $ 38,500 $179,175 10 yrs. has increased) • 11. M/C $ 4,000 North Lakes Courts (complete with 10,000 ---------drops out----- 5 yrs. maintenance funds) 12. N $ 15,000 Swimming Pool Safety $ 18$00 $197,675 10 yrs. ' a, New electrical $4,000 (restrooms/buildings) b. New restroom $30000 (ADA) c, New diving (2) $2,500 boards d. Ladders (8) $9,000 13. M $ 21500 Paint Airport $4,279 ---------drops out----- 5 yrs. exterior-wood replacement like Visual Arts 14. N $120,000 New Roof Library/Police $111,000 $308,675 15 yrs. (Constant Splitting) a. (N) Library $107,000 entire roof b. (N) Police $ 4,000 not tile portion tar portion only c, (M) Civic center ---------drops out----- d. (M) Senior Center ---------drops out----- 15. N $ 12,800 Security systems $ 60000 $314,675 10 yrs. Recreation Centers * North Lakes $2,000 * Senior Center $2,000 * Civic Center $20000 16, N $ 22,700 Renovate Parking Lot Fire station #4 $ 22,700 $337,375 15 yrs. $23,000 (cement) 17. N $ 20,600 Renovate Parking Lot $ 28,000 $365,375 10 yrs, Airport $31,000 (asphalt) (2800 square yards x $10) 18. C $ 3,000 New door openers Fire drops out--------- 19. C $ 2,000 Remc'~e Control Doors Fire ---------drops out--------- ~S h Is i l r rrf January 16, 1992 Agonda 119m~ ,w Page 3 Wle Proposed Amount Estimated Cumulative` Lifer of nkinq Jun9-1-Z Projects Cost _ Total Pru ect 20. M $ 31000 New Fence visual Arts -----------drops out--------- 21. X S 17,200 Paint interior Visual Arts -----------drops out----•------ 22. ? $ 150000 Now Civic Center Tables -----------drops out---------- 23. M $ 12,00" Maintenance Visual Arts $12,000 drops out---------- 4 24. M $ 80000( Paint City Hall, Library, Civic Center exterior -----------drops out---------- a. city Hall $20,000 b. Library 40,000 c. Civic Center 20,000 25. 1, $130,000 Renovate Parking Lots Visual Arts Entry $5,000 $110,555 $475,930 10 yrs. Civic center $105,555 10,555 sq. yards (asphalt) 26. M $135,00C City Preventative taint. 1!1351000 ---------drops out-------- 27. N $ 55,000 New Sidewalks City Hall $ 25,665 $501,595 15 yrs, a. Civic Center Entry a.b.c. cover $ 6,335 b. Civic Center/ City Hall walk $ 71460 c. City Hall East and front walks $11,870 d. City Hall parking (Approximately $5.00 per square) lot sidewalks $13,875 (concrete brick pavers) e. City Hall courtyard (Pick and choose using maps - upper level $15,710 f. City Ha1.1 courtyard a lower level and steps $20,470 g. Garden area, apron legs to Library west side of Civic Center $12,405 28. C $ 30,000 Emergency Power at all Fire Stations --------------drops out--------- 29. N $ 91000 Library Drapery $ 41000 $505,595 10 yrs. 30. N $ 25,000 Gas Conversion - old part of Senior $ 35,000 $540,595 10 yrs. Center Increase due to gas piping needed \ c C IE h.r~i..:.ppr~ iU I ca r S January 160 1992 konda No. 9~2 Page - 4 AGooda 1tom._._A2V Wo ~ r Proposed Amount Estimated Cumulativ Zfe of Ranking June 12 Projects Cost Total Project 31. N -0- New sound system $ 14,600 $ 555,195 10 yrs. Council Chambers 32. N -0- ADA projects not $ 8,410 $ 563,605 10 yrs. listed on Or #7 a.b.c.d. a. listening devices $2,400.00 b. City Hall restroom + $2,510.00 C. Ramp City Hall $1,500.00 d. Auto door (1) ADA $2, 000 33. N -0- Contingency - $ 30,950 $ 594,555 34. N 45,000 Architectural support $ 30,950 $ 625,505 construction admin. 35. M $ 10800 Renovate Airport Terminal 6,700 $ 632,205 10 yrs. 36. M $ 50,000 Convert Stations to gas $ 25,000 $ 657,205 14 yrs. 37. M $ 12,000 Roof renovation for two recreation centers $ 12,000 $ 669,205 10 yrs. 36. M $ 3,800 Lighting renovation City Hall $ 71000 $ 676,205 15 yrs. 39. N $ 25,000 New carpet City Hall $ 20,000 $ 696,205 10 yrs. some areas ***it,t**,r*ir#**xk*,4***********,t* CUT OFF **+**k*sFtV****,t,t,t*k,r,tt*t,t*t** 40. N $112,000 New Moore Renovation $ 112,000 10 yrs. (new a/c - floor for office space) 41. N $120,000 City Hall fire 15 sprinklers $ 95,000 yrs. 42. M $ 10,000 Renovate drill tower $ 101000 10 yrs. 43. M $ 25,000 Fire repair master p yrs. plan $ 25,000 44. N $586,000 New Roofs-General 15 yrs. Fund buildings $ 586,000 i t 1. v. .::a,, 1A ~i January 16, 1992 AdondaNo, Page 5 Agonda flop, lblu J_ e_ez/ 9 r Proposed Amount Estimated Cumulati e -/Life of Rankin June 12 Protects Cost _ Total Pro'ec 45. M $170,000 Energy Management $ 170,000 15 yrs, 46. M $ 25,000 Energy Conversion $ 25,000 10 yrs. Fire 47. M $586,000 Police A/C Upgrade $ 20,000 10 yrs. 48. M $ 8,000 Handcarved doors $ 81000 5 yrs. s downtown 49. M $ 5,000 North Lakes room $ 51000 5 yrs, divider 50. M $ 38,000 Additional office $ 38,000 5 yrs. space/Recreation 51. N $ 41800 New Library doors complete 10 yrs. 52. M $ 2,000 Tree-house renovation $ 21000 5 yrs. 53. N $ 61500 New office GIS $ 65,000 0 yrs. 54. M $ 2,000 Conference Room $ 2,000 0 yrs, customer service 55. M $ 41000 Court renovation complete 56. M $ 61000 New A/C Traffic 1/2 complete 10 yrs. 57. M $ 2,500 New Ceiling Station $ 2,500 10 yrs. #4 58. M $ 41200 Paneling Repair $ 4,000 10 yrs. Airport 59. M $ 27,000 City Hall Porter $ 27,000 0 yrs. 60. M $ 21,000 Contract Cleaning $ 210000 Library 0 yrs. 61. M $ 44,000 Service Center repair $ 44,000 10 yrs, 62, M $ 4,000 Paint Personnel $ 41000 5 yrs. 63. M $ 25,000 Extra cleaning $ 25,000 0 yrs, recreation centers 64, N $ 45,000 New office space for $ 45,000 Annex 0 yrs' 65, M $ 38,000 Replace Central cancelled 15 yrs. Fire drive C y i i .A! v11 ' .1 t January 16, 1992 panda No, ww Page 6 Agenda Item_~y! Proposed Amount Estimated cumulativd L e of Rankin Tune l Projects cost Total Pr of 15 yrs. 66. M $ 25,000 Renovate Fire #1 cancelled 15 yrs. 67. M Renovate central cancelled (four different areas) AJJOOOD5 i 8. Ci t ~o A C. C. C. a. Civic Center Entry d. cover $ 6$35 fd. b. Civic Center/City Hall walk $ 71460 C, City Hall East and CGUNN front walks $11,870 d. City Hall parking lot sidewalks $13,875 d. e. City Hall courtyard upper level $15,710 f. City Hall courtyard lower level and steps $20,470 9. Garden area, apron legs to Librar west side of Civic Center $12,405 t.. w a 't s ~i CITY COUNCIL oo~oooaoaooaaooaooo Od ~ N r Op a OQ ~ a - 0 0 o O o C7 o - O pao~~~~~QCQGGOfl~G~O O 4 } x panda No. ~o?-otga2.___ Agotda 1,ain_.~U ~__-_--.74 CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MIN NE4~ / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORAIiDUX TO: Betty McKean, Executive Director s Municipal Services/Economic Development FROM, Thomas W. Klinck, Director Personnel/Employee Relations DATE: January 8, 1992 SUBJECT: IMPLEMENTATION OF "SMOKE-FREE WORKPLACE" POLICY AND "USE OF SMOKELESS TOBACCO" POLICY The Surgeon General has called smoking "the single most preventable cause of death" in the United States. It has been reported that "smoking is responsible for more than 1 in every 6 deaths in the United States each year." Research in the last 10 years has established that involuntary smoking is a cause of disease, including lung cancer, in healthy non-smokers, and that children of parents who smoke have an increased frequency of respiratory infections and symptoms. The National Research Council estimates that in a given year, from 2,490 to 5,160 non-smokers may have died of cancer from environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). There are legal cases documenting worker's compensations claims and disability claims resulting from second hand smoke inhalation. Several oases have held that employees with respiratory illnesses or hypersensitivity to tobacco smoke qualify as "handicapped" individuals under federal or state law. The current City of Denton Smoking Policy 108.03, Use of Smoking and Smokeless Tobacco, was presented to Clty Council in January, 1987, and approved with a caveat that a report be made on its effectiveness. If the results were unfavorable, the City was to rescind this policy and proceed with a policy to totally ban smoking. From 1987 through 1990 a number of complaints, due to health problems, were received in the Personnel Department. As a result, Personnel was urged to pulse the organization to see if the current policy was working. in an effort to obtain this information, the survey question (Is the current smoking policy working in our organization?) was placed in the March/April 1990 employee 81715668200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 , t j i~ Agonda No. Betty McKean Agonda Itom_Z~d_5_3 _ January 8, 1992 tale _ r~ N Page 2 ~d Newsletter. of the 74 respondents, 39% agreed that the policy was working and 58% felt that the policy was not working. In January 1991, the Executive Committee requested that an alternative policy be prepared. The alternative policy went to Legal for review and was presented to the Wellness Committee for feedback. An overwhelming majority of the Wellness Committee agreed with the need for a stronger policy; however, a number of concerns were voiced in the Police Department. As a result, the a City Manager requested the Policy Committee review the proposed policy and make a recommendation. The Policy Committee recommended to move forward with the proposed policy. In an effort to get overall employee feedback, Directors ,a and Division Managers received copies of the proposed "Smoke-Free workplace" policy and the "Use of Smokeless Tobacco" policy and were asked to brief their employees and encourage them to provide Personnel with feedback by December 20, 1991. The feedback that was received included 5 employees from the Police Department who were strongly opposed to implementation (see attachment 1); 2 employees from other areas who felt that each building should have a designated smoking area; and 2 that agreed with the policy and even felt that exceptions should not be made for the prisoners and witnesses at the Police Department. In an effort to review what other cities in the metroplex have done regarding use of tobacco products, copies of the following smoking policies have been studied: Plano, Irving, Arlington Police Department, Garland, and Grand Prairie. Attachment 2 summarizes these policies. It is clear these cities are also concerned with the effects of smoking and tobacco products on the health of their employees. Each have implemented a slightly different approach. organizations such as Denton Independent School District and the University of Texas System in Austin hrve also implemented policies banning smoking in their facilities. It is recommended that the city of Denton revise existing policy 108.03 Use of Smuking and Smokeless Tobacco and adopt 2 policies to address the smoking and tobacco products issues: "Smoke-Free Workplace" policy (Attachment 3) and "Use of Smokeless Tobacco') policy (Attachment 4). These policies are also outlined below. "Smoke-Free Workplace" Policy outline The use of smoking tobacco products is prohibited within any municipal facility of the City of Denton with the following exceptions: 4 G Y. r w i i i i1 s • Aonnda No. Agenda Item MLd[.~...~_ . Betty McKean Data ~~f y !B January 8, 1992 C Page 3 1 1.t~enects and witnesses may smoke in designated areas of the Police Department during interviews and in- terrogations. r 2. Smoking is permitted in a designated area of the jail for inmates only. The use of smoking tobacco products is prohibited in the City of Denton vehicles with the following exceptions: 1. Employees who are assigned a take-home vehicle may smoke in that vehicle if permission is expressly obtained in + advance from all other passengers. 2. Smoking will be allowed in department "pool vehicles" provided that non-smoking "pool vehicles" are designated and available, and provided that permission is expressly obtained in advance from all other passengers. 3. Smoking is allowed in open air vehicles such as heavy equipment. Employees may smoke outside during their normal break periods and at meal periods. This policy does not address the issue of "smokeless" tobacco and the current policy does. To prevent confusion, a policy entitled "Use of Smokeless Tobacco Products" was drafted. "Use of Smokeless Tobacco Products" Policy outline The use of smokeless tobacco products is prohibited in all office environments, enclosed work facilities, and areas where sanitation is a problem or concern, as designated by the area supervisor. in areas of municipal facilities where the use of smokeless tobac a~ products is not otherwise prohibited, the preference of the people in the area shall dictate whether such use is permitted in that area. An employee shall responsibly dispose of all waste products generated by his or her use of smokele&,s tobacco products. A supervisor may prohibit the use of smokeless tobacco products in any area where employees fail to responsibly dispose of waste products generated by the use of smokeless tobacco products. Employees who violate the "Smoke-Free Workplace" or "Use of Smokeless Tobacco Products" policies are subject to disciplinary action as outlined in Policy 109.01 Disciplinary Action. However, City employees who experience performance or personal difficulties t, SJ j{ l Betty McKean A4londa No. _•Q~?-~JQ ~ 10 January 8, 1992 n(londa1Itern_ Page 4 Lb1o 1 l while breaking a nicotine addiction may seek help through U the ee Assi_ stat~ce Program, For example, staff is gcurrently researching ways to implement smokin Interested employees or supervisors may contactea representatiivemosf the Personnel./Employee Relations Department for assistance. The City of Denton is concerned about the health and wellness of its employees and customers. Therefore, it is necessary to have and enforce a policy that will prevent non-smokers from being affected by environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). We are therefore recommending the "Smoke-Free Workplace" policy ~ Council for review with an implementation date ofe Junes 1,t 992 The "Use of Smokeless Tobacco" policy is recommended by staff as smokeless tobacco is not addressed in the proposed smoke-free policy. The implementation date of June 1, 1992 is suggested in an effort to put into place a program that will help those interested communicate our commitment to assisting remployeesc inathei i efforts to stop smoking. Thomas N. XI aok l { is i3 `J F, Agenda No.~DOZ- _ OUTLINE OF ATTACHMENTS Agenda Itom_._f4„__..____. Cato _ Attachment 1 Employee Feedback Attachment 2 Summary of Other Cities' Policies Attachment 3 Smoke-Free Workplace Policy Attachment 4 Use of Smokeless Tobacco Products Policy a l C_ ig AttaCunent 1 Agonda No. Agonda itam ~5 3_ Feedback on smoke-Bras Workplace P(S~ioyl 2 Zn Because environmental tobacco smoke .is a known ucarcinogen shown to cause disease. including cancer, in healthy non smokers... "These statements should be enough incentive to put this policy into effect on 1/1/92. Why the exceptions in III. A. 1 & 2 (suspects, witnesses, and inmates)? 2 e "I feel that each facility should have a designated smoke area. I feel the rights of smokers are being infringed upon when we lose these areas." Roger M. 3. "All buildings and vehicles should be smoke free! No one should have to pass through a smoking area to gain access to a building or work area. No smoking should be allowed while the operation of a vehicle or machinery is taking place. (ex.. person driving vehicle home in the evening lights up a smoke, the operator drops cigarette in lap-- what could happen?)" Ronnie 4. To: Chief Jez, From: stockard "Here we go again, this smoke-free workplace. Recently designates for the United Way came to talk to us and was concern by the cold reception they received. I've been asked why I didn't bowl in the city's league or attend picnics or other city sponsored social events. My response is why should I? I used to give to United Way but quit when I felt that the city wanted me to do for them for nothing in return. This committee has not one iota of compromise in them. I though the last actions taken were a bit unreasonable but would try to live with it. Now we are being cast out entirely. The policy statement says 'one of the most valuable assets of the City of Denton is its employee work force'. What a falsehood. They may say it but sure don't believe it. They wonder why people go to the job and not to careers. Why do people just punch 8 and forget the rest. Why don't employees defend the city when citizens complain? Why should employees have any loyalty to City Hall? By the examples they show they aren't loyal to employees, In our representative form of government, we have no voice. All we've asked for is simply some designated area and all we get is cast out. I just don't know what to say except I hope no one from City Hall asks me to donate time, money, or any part of myself to the city. I'll give them 8 hours work for 8 hours pay but after that they can kiss my ass. A few special interest groups run the city and we're just the expendable pawns of the city. 5o if this is going to be a smoke free workplace we need to ad the smoke they blow up our ass." r, Y. Agunda No. Feedback on Smoke-Free Workplace Policy Agenda Ilom (dL~ w.. Page 2 Do te ' N ly, 5. CO To Chief Jez, "I have been employed with this department for almost 15 years. I have read the Smoking policy that is being proposed and do not agree with it. It is very bias against smokers, I am 45 years old and as long as I've worked for the City it seems like each year there is someone in city management who just isn't satisfied unless they miss with the employees. I've been a smoker for 30 years and have rLo, plans to stop. I do my best to respect the current policy that we have. The current policy is working fine at the Police Department. It is such a shame if the reason for the new policy is because someone abused the current one and now all smokers are being punished. If we arrest a person for D.W.I. because they did not comply with the law should we arrest everyone who even has one drink? I think not. Punish the people who violate the current policy not everyone. Is it going to look good to the public that at every doorway to every city building there are employees standing smoking? I think not. someone in City Hall. has made a grave mistake writing the new proposed policy. I hope you will pass this letter on to City Hall to let them know how I feel, I know this probably doesn't matter to them for I'm just an employee and I can be replaced. It seem like the City really has no concern for an employee. Because they really don't care about us or our feelings, I know that I do not plan to retire with the city and a lot of other employees feel the same way. The City Motto, Dedicated to Quality Service is a joke. When the City can not be dedicated to its own employees." Thanks for allowing me to express my opinion. Bob Stalder Denton Police Department ih t+ 1 ?t r ' ~ ~ondauo...,9a~ p• Coo 4VII) Denton Police Department 221 N. ELM DENTON, TEXAS 78201 15 November, 1991 6. Michael Jez, Chief of Police Denton Police Department ° Denton, Texas 76201 Chief Jez; In regards to the proposed no smoking policy, I feel that it is aimed, at office workers only. Employees who are confined to this building are being discriminated against ...in more ways than one. 1. The detectives who smoke and the supervisors who smoke are able to leave the building at any time and can stay gone for hours at a time. Office workers are confined to the building. 2. If witnesses and suspects are allowed to smoke in any area in Central Operations, it is unfair to prohibit smoking by employees in the same areas. 3. Those people in jail are being treated better than office workers, since they will have a designated smoking area. Where is the justice in this? I thought the city of Denton was an equal opportunity employer. I thought all employees are supposed to be treated equal. Employees in Central Operations seem to be content with the arrangement as it stands now. We have designated smoking arean and no one is complaining. Since office workers are, more or less, confined to their work stations, we would all like a designated smoking area inside the building. Respectfully, . Kathz, Clerk Central Operations Denton Police Department i Denton, Texas 76201 r~ (817) 566.8.181 METRO 434.2520 t t✓ j. 01 l Agenda No. '1 C Agandallan_~ Denton PollicVeEDepartment 221 . DENTON, TEXAS 76201 ' November 15, 1991 Michael Jez, Chief of Police Denton Police Department Denton, Texas 76201 I have been a city employee for fifteen years. I have always worked in a private office which is not generally open to the public, I have always respected the wishes of non-smokers. I have never smoked in the hallways, the elevators, or in other employees work spaces. I do not smoke when dealing with the public even when those citizens choose to smoke. Since I have restricted my smoking to my own office and have respected the rights of non-smokers in the past...without a written no smoking policy ...I feel that my rights as a smoker should also be respected now and in the future. The proposed policy prohibits smoking by city employees inside the buildings; yet, it allows city employees to smoke in their vehicles. In this division (Central Operations), this means that the detectives would be allowed to continue to smoke while office workers confined to their offices could not. Is this fair? This policy allows the public (suspects and witnesses) to smoke in our work area; yet, we are not allowed to smoke in the same work area. Is this fair? This policy allows jail inmates to smoke in a designated area, but we don't have a designated smoking area. Is this fair? Smokers pay more taxes than non-smokers; yet,we are being discriminated against. A All we are asking for is a designated smoking area. J. 1,c tc- , Y illie L. Miller, Secretary Central Operations Denton Police Department Denton, Texas 76201 (817) 566.8181 METRO 434.2520 ~r c 1 x Agenda No. Acdonda Ilom November 21,1991 pole .h 8. To: Chief Nike Jez From: Detective Margaret Yarbrough Subject: Smoke Free Workplace { once again the closed minds of the anti-smokers are working and interferring in my workplace. Whoever these "policy=writars" are can be compared on the same flat-lane-brain-scan of the "Right to Lifers" anti-abortionist people. 1 They have created controversy where there had not been any previousky and exaggerate the reports of health and environmental issues asdcauses. If the writers of the 4 policy are so well educated in the medical profession perhaps they should be employed at a medical research facility to better suit their interests. I smoke and I have also been the recipient of many "Thanks for Not Using Any Sick Days This Year" certificates. Take that certificate and reduce my health premieums. But don't accuse me of being someone who abuses and used the health care of the insurance because I smoke. The most ludicrous assumption that the City of Denton Policy Writers assume that I automatically will "break the nicotine" addiction with the help of their friends in the EAP is a quantum leap of bad judgment on their part. This policy personally insults me and I feel the City of Denton writer or writers of this proposed olicy owes an apology. f(f 2 P r~~ tic~~~u ~ Na gore Yarbro h 1 { I' <4 M a. i r~ 1'f Attachment 2 Rn~a Na. Aganda Ifn.,mi.__/~~5__ SUMMARY OF OTHER OITIESf POLICIES ~r V TI ~o City of Irving smoking is prohibited in city owned and operated buildings & City-owned vehicles where there is more than 1 occupant. City of Garland Smoking is prohibited in all indoor and enclosed areas of municipally- owned buildings and facilities. Smoking prohibited while driving or riding in a city vehicle, ' City of Arlington Smoking is prohibited in the City Police Department of Arlington Police Department except those areas specifically designated as smoking areas. smoking is prohibited in any vehicle owned or leased by the City and under control of the Dept. City of Plano smoking is prohibited within any municipal facility of the City of Piano except within designated smoking areas set out in Exhibit A Beginning 1/1/91, smoking will. be prohibited in those areas as well. City of Grand Prairie Smoking is prohibited in areas to which the general public routinely has access for municipal services. Other Municipal Buildings are to " be reviewed and addressed by the department manager whose staff occupy the building. C v, PROPOSED POLICY A,ttachmwt 3 CITY OF DENTON PAOE_j_,_OF 2 POLICY/ADKINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADKINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE SECnON: REFERFN CE NUMBER: PERSONNEL/EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 108,03 A SUBIECC: EFFECTIVE DATE: STANDARDS OF CONDUCT 06101192 T=: REPLACES: SMOKE-FREE WORKPLACE Agenda No..1 _ 108, MIMI oorn- 4 I. POLICY STATEMENTi W1 0 D The City of Denton desires to conduct its opelona th the utmost regard for the safety of its employees, its customers, and the public. One of the most valuable assets of the City of Denton is its employee workforce. In recognition of that belief, the City promotes the health, safaty, and well-being of each individual through progressive health and bauefit programs. Because the City's obligation includes concern for all employees in all areas of known hazardsl and because environmental tobacco smoke is a carcinogen shown to cause disease, including cancer, in healthy non-smokers, as well as aggravate allergic reactions including watery eyes, coughing and headaches in susceptible individuals, all of which lead to impaired performance and increased health care costal it is therefore the policy of the City of Denton to limit use of smoking tobacco products to certain areas designated by the City Manager as outlined in Administrative Directive effective January 1, 1992. II. DEFINITIONS "Municipal Facility" means any building or structure owned or operated by the City of Denton. "Open air vehicle" means any vehicle owned or operated by the City of Denton which, by its design, is incapable of isolating passengers from the free flow of outside air. "Smoking" means the combustion of any product or material containing tobacco. "Vehicle" moans any car, truck, bus, or van owned or operated by the City of Denton, +ssed for conveying persons, supplies, equipment, etc. III. ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE A. The tiusa of tobacco products is prohibited within any municipal facility of the City of Denton with the following exceptions 1. Suspects and witnesses may smoke in designated areas of the Police Department during interviews and interrogations. Employees may not smoke in these areas at any time. 2. Smoking is permitted in a designated area of the jail. 3. Employees may smoke outdoors during their normal break periods and at meal periods. J (i I{ I ,,I AgondalIIlna-_Z11M (kilo _L✓ J 2 OLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ADMINIS I rG7g2L_OF, / VIRECTIVE (continued) TMM REMENCE NUMBER: SMOKE-FREE E WORKPLACE 108,03 A S. The use of tobacco products is prohibited in the City of Denton vehicles with the following exceptiona: 1. Employees who are assigned a take-home vehicle may smoke in that vehicle if permission is expressly obtained in advance from all other passengers. 2. Smoking will be allowed in department "pool vehicles" provided that non-smoking "pool vehicles" are designated and availablet and provided that permission is expressly obtained in advance from all other passengers. 3. Smoking is allowed in open air vehicles such as heavy.equipment. C. The Superintendent of Building Operations shall conspicuously place "No smoking" signs at the main entrance of all municipa;, facilities, and shall additionally place signs designating authorized smoking areas in the Police Department. D. Employeea will be allowed to smoke outside the facilities U!o.-ing their normal break period and lunch. E. Any employee who smokes or otherwise uses tobacco products in violation of this policy is subject to disciplinary action as outlined in Policy 109.01 Disciplinary Action. F. City employees who experience performance or personal difficulties while overcoming a nicotine addiction may seek heip through the City's health insurance program or Employee Assistance Program (EAP), outlined in Policy 107.10 Employee Assistance Proar,rt. . Interested employees or supervisors may contact a representative of the Personnel /Employee Relations Department for assistance. a ! r AAA00101 A a Iq:'.ay+1t f ~I Y .I Attachmott A PROPOSED POLICY AgendaNo._~o? D CITY OF DENTON Agenda Itom__~__~ PAGE I,OF~? POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECT 1-~-L_! g SECTION: REPERENCE NUMBER, ras.o3 a PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE RELATIONS BPFECCIVE DATE: SUBJECT: 06/01/92 STANDARDS OF CONDUCT REPLACES TrTLE; : USE OF SMOKELESS TOBACCO PRODUCTS 108.03 I. POLICY STATEMENTS The use of smokeless tobacco is offensive to many people, citizens and co- workers alike. A work environment in which employees are allowed to use smokeless tobacco products promotes an image which many regard as unsanitary and unprofessional. It is therefore the policy of the City of Denton, Texas to permit the use of smokeless tobacco products by City employees only in areas designated by the City Manager to minimize the possibility that others will be offended by an employee's use of these products. II. DEFINITIONS "Smokeless Tobacco Products" means any product or preparation containing tobacco, including chewing tobacco, snuff, and smokeless tobacco, but not including cigarettes, cigars, or pipe tobacco. III. ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE A. Prohibited Areas 1. The use of smokeless tobacco products is prohibited in the following designated areas of municipal facilities: a. All office environments. b. Enclosed work facilities, c. Areas where sanitation is a problem or concern, as designated by the area supervisor. B. Permitted areas. 1. In areas of municipal facilities where the use of smokeless tobacco products is not otherwise prohibited, the preference of the people !n the area shall dictate whether such use is permitted in that area. 2. Notwithstanding the designation of any permitted area, an employee shall not us9 smokeless tobacco products unless he or she has first asked for and obtained the unanimous consent of all persons in that area. C. An employee shall responsibly dispose of all waste products generated by his or her use of smokeless tobacco products. Notwithstanding any other provision of this policy allowing the use of smokeless tobacco products, a supervisor may prohibit the use of smokeless tobacco products in any area where employees fail to responsibly dispose of waste products generated by the use of smokeless tobacco products. PAGE~2 OF 2 POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (Continued) y TrrLB: REFERENCE NUMBER: USE OF SMOKELESS TOBACCO PRODUCTS 108.03 8 ' D. Arty employee who ueee tobacco products in violation of this policy or its directives during working hours or while upon any municipal facility is subject to disciplinary action as outlined in Policy 109.01 Disciplinary ctio . E. City employees who experience performance or personal difficulties while breaking a nicotine addiction may seek help through the City's health insurance program or Employee Assistance Program (EAP), as outlined in Policy 107.10 Employee Assistance Program. Interested employees or supervisors may 4 contact a representative of the Personnel/Employee Relations Department for assistance. IV. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE Supervisors are responsible for communicating this policy to, and enforcing the policy upon, their subordinates. The preference of any person offended by the use of smokeless tobacco products shall be considered controlling if a mutual agreement cannot be reached. Any employee who has a problem, complaint, or concern with the enforcement of this policy and directive is encouraged to' utilize the procedures outlined in Policy 115.02 "Problem Solving". Agonda No. _ "QQ Agenda Item. ~S 3 c AAA0028C I 1}C } t CURRENT POLICY CITY OF DENTON PAOE.10P_.j_ N% FOLICT/ADMIX16TRATIVI PROCIDURE/ADVININTRATITI DIIIOTITI DREpERENCE C, SECTION; NUMBER: pigs aNwELI Me LAYER 21LATTInNIL EFFECTIVE DATE; SUBJECT: STANDODS OF CONDUCT 01/20/67 TITLE: REPLACES; 00 L ACaada horn - - POLICY STATEMENT: Data The City of Denton recognises that the use of smoking and smokeless tobbdho in a~ the workplace may be a discomfort to those in confined work environments. In an effort to provide a healthy, pleseant, and efficient work environment for all employees, the use of smoking and smokeless tobacco shall be prohibited in designated areas and those areas where members of the public and employees routinely have access. The supervisor also has the prerogative to prohibit the use of smoking and smokeless tobacco in any area under hie/her supervision. Whenever A mutual agreement cannot be reaohed, the preference of the nonuser of tobacto shall be considered controlling. ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE: 1. THE USE OF SMOKING TOBACCO A. Non-designated Smoking Areas 1. Smoking shall be prohibited in the following designated areas of City facilities: a. Conference dnd meeting rooms b. Classrooms and training rooms c. Open areas of libraries d. Auditoriums e. Copier and computer terminal rooms f. Restrooms and public lounges S. Locker rooms h. Storage areas I. Elevators J. Halle k. Stairwells 1. All areas where smoking would be a safety hazard or could cause damsge to sensitive equipment, processes, or materials. k ;t PAGE 2 OF_ POLIOT/ADMINIATIATIYI PI00SDI1II/ADMINIS TRAMS DIIICTIVI (Qorflaaodf REFERENCE TITLE: NUMBER: USE OF SMOKING AND SMOKILISS TOBACCO AOondaNo, 108.03 Agontla Ilont. 2. In addition, spooking shall be prohibited in all r as to Ach members of the public and employees routinely have access. These include, but are not limited to: a. Lobbies b, Reception areas o. Customer conference areas d. Cashier locations. B. Designated Smoking Areas 1. In such areas where smoking is otherwise not prohibited, the preference of the people in the area shall diatato whether smoking is permitted in that area. Smoking is permitted in the following designated areas of City facilities: a. pen office environments b, Individual offices a. City vehicles d. Employee loungen e. Employee break rooms. 2. In areas where smoking is permitted and prior to smoking, an employee must first secure the unanimous consent of all persons in that area. C. A sign prohibiting smoking shall be posted at the main entrance to every City owned facility and in areas where smoking is prohibited within the workplace. This sign shall be conspicuous and contain the worde "No Smoking," the universal symbol for no smoking, or other language that clearly prohibits smoking. II. THE USE OF SHOKKLESS TOBACCO A. Smokeless Tobacco is Prohibited in the following designated areas of City facilities: 1. All office environments 2. Knclosed work facilities 3. Areas where sanitation is a problem, as designated by the area supervisor. li h l L K i ,r i "r AAOE 3 OF.L POLIMADIIINIOTRATIYR PROCRDIUMADYININTRATITR DIRRCTITR (Ceallased) r~ 7AEFERENCE °J TITLE; UM8ERr USE OF SKOKING AND SMOKILISS TOBACCO 108.03 Nonda No, Agenda fto^:_~J'3 ~ B. Designated Smokeless Tobacco Areas 0310 J~~ _F /p 1. In such areas where the use of smokelsss tobacco' to oth4igee not prohibited, the preference of the people in the area shall dictate the status of that area. The use of smokeless tobacco ` is permitted in the following designated areas of City owned facilities: a. City owned vehicles b. Areas where sanitation is not a problem. 2. In areas where smokeless tobacco is permitted, prior to using smokeless tobacco, an employee must first secure the unanimous consent of all persons in that area. III. It shall be the nisponsibility of the user to clean up areas where smoke or amokeleGLI tobacco !a permitted. A supervisor may prohibit the use of smoke or smokeless tobacco for failure of the user to provide proper disposal and sanitation of smoke or smokeless tobacco remnants. IV. ADKINISTRATIVI PROCEDURE Supervisors will be raeponsible for the comminication of and compliance with the guidelines of this policy. The preference of the nonuser of tobacco shall be considered controlling if a mutual agreement cannot be reached. Any employee who has a problem, complaint, or concern with the enforcement of this policy and direotive is encouraged to utilize the procedures outlined in Policy 115.02 "Problem Solving." V. CONFLICTS In the event of any conflict between this policy and Article IV, "SMOKING," of CHAPTER 13 of the CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, whichever is more restrictive shall be controlling. 0496g 01/22/87 , ~ 1, pp~ j (0~ ~O r O\~ Qi V\ Q ,,f--EXISTING 8' WATER LINE -2-= mom P R O J E 'ROJECT HYDRANT r EXISTING 10' SANITARY SEWER tLOCAT _OCAT ! ON HDSOR 04. 1 - - - $ 8S i Lr _ 14~Y n1nf4? - w 5.0 Z Q - or nJ 4's z- cr- O' 6 ~J, m_ Of < _b V) w : w z:l i i w z ~z 1 f L~ L o. 3 p w L` N O w co Y s • i w r ~ a Ld T QN ' Y cr or i C0 l ° N i' 0) t v a i - . t it 1- T~  o r ooz 00 4 2 7 Olin N' 890 1 ! 890 1g35• w 432,7e.. PRELIMINARY NARY PLAT OF OF EUGENE BLAGG VOL, 319, PG, 358 LOT 1, BI BLOCK I i D.R.D.C.T. ZONED " AG , " FAD L ION T T-2 ADDITION BEING EING 00 • lo"w w 4,116 AC ~L OWNED BY; DEVELOPED IN THE 1OPED BY: PREPARED BY: RESOLCUTMN TRUST CORP. SEM DEVi DEVELOM ENT AND ACQUISMON (GQ0DWM I BBB & CRR Co RECIEVER FOR DENTON FEDERAL SAVINGS ABSTRACT N & LOAN ASSOCIATION 1303 WAM WALNUT I-L LANE _f ARSHALLi IRVNG, TEX TEXAS 75438 SITUATED I r CIVIL ENGINEERS - PLANNERS • SURVEYORS CITY OF DEN P,O, BOX 1307 DENTOR TEXAS 76201 6001 Badge street. Suite 100, Fort Worth Texas 76,12 TaN, DENT( Metro (817} 429-4373 • DECDOER 19 01 a 1 I. It i J -•a ~•ti yrs Y i , i PROJECT :y LOCATION AtWFH t 20 0 20 40 so WINDSOR DR. F ONE INCH 40 FEET N F- F N N = o SUMMAI SUMMARY UNIVERSITY DRIVE .„Q~W UM WATELI& - - I PRCPOSI PROPOSED 32,710 SO, FT■ SUPERMARKET USE + yv - a QM ! PARKING PARKING REQUIRED (1/200 SC. FT.) 164 SPACES i PARKING PARKING PROVIDED 166 SPACES 80 Fr Row LANDSC LANDSCAPE SUMMARY WINDSOR DRI VE TOTAL S1 I.OTAL STREET YARD 112,763 SC■ FT. h S 89°40'30" E 4 3 fi , 89 ' 20% LANI Y/M'DSCA E i. ~ LfTr•EA~F~',i• r=-ter r7.~ 1 ITT.- 1 l + i i i L t r r" 00 hc ~r r s S OF f i 1 3271 00 1 Aim . a i Zo 30,E Moo' •1 i b a-  1 i r ;01* Q Q PYLON SIGN DETi4L i 1 5 r f t Q Q~Lr) CIO, 00 ~O~ RECEIVED JAN 0 3 W 3 60 Ft -ST L 4r, SKANNIN G A MEHOPMEHT DETENTION Q I~ DEP AREA C o cur r Ea E+rENr r ,r F4 *ma •v+ r ....~...~r~ N 89° ! 8' 35 " a'.M~ WALL p FT. EAST OF Row 6 fTr HIGH "BRICK-CRETE' SCREENING WALL ALONE 432,78 VALL ALONO PROPERTY L INE f EUGENE 8L A 66 DETAILED VOL, 319, PG 358 DRDCT r ZONED A ' '%RF_ SIDENTAIL 4. 116 IN 7 11 ~ I ~ OWNED BY: DEVELOPED BY: PREPARED BY: BBB & CRR ,10MENT, W. 6'l 0 0 D W N I ABSTRACT RECIEVER FOR DENTON FEDERAL SAVINGS 1303 WALNUT HILL LANE & LOAN ASSOCIATION IRVING, TEXAS 75038 A R S H A L L SITUATED PdHMERS . SURVEY®n CITY OF DENTON , DEl P,O, BOX 1307 6001 Bridge Street, Suite 0, Fort Worth Texas 76112 DEMISE DENTON, TEXAS 76201 Metro (817) 429-4373 j l~~ J1 1 f t j~ i `17 y 44~ 4M4 -f::tl TT: --CITY - r COUNCIL TT: i T: T IT - = o~oooooor, Ole 'Q~O y ~ 1 ~O . o P a a 'T IT: ~pv - i ro r y~. r ii Nonda No. _ zo~ A41ooda Ilrrrr~{J- _ W10 CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING 1 DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE(817) 688.8307 VT-^-------_---- -Office of the City Manager M E M O R A N D U M TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager <<7!' DATE: January 15, 1992 SUBJECT: Bridge Repairs Several weeks ago we mentioned that we were beginning to face some real problems with some of our drainage structures due to the recent prolonged rains. We were concerned about three structures; Mayhill Road at Cooper Creek, Mayhill Road at Pecan Creek, and Hobson lane at Fletcher Branch. The bridge at Cooper Creek and Mayhill Road has been barricaded since the last part of November. You may recall that the whole southern abutment for this bridge has shifted, and we felt that we could no longer allow traffic to use it. This bridge is jointly owned by us and the County and we have been attempting to discuss solutions with them for the fast month or so. Early this week, we were able to visit with Commissioner Cole find Dennis Burn to talk about an interlocal agreement for the long term solution and also A some interim solutions. The interim solution involves an agreement whereby we would remove the old structure. The County would buy some large culverts, install them, and rebuild the crossing. There is no doubt that this would flood in very, very heavy rains, and we would have to barricade At off in those situations. This would be the interim solution. The long term solution involves the total replacement of this bridge. The County would remove their big pipe, and we would jointly fund the installation of a new clear span structure in its place. As mentioned, we have agreed to fund this on a 50/50 basis since we have joint ownership in the structure. We believe the cost of this solution to be approximately $60,000. The second structure is at Mayhill Road and Pecan Creek. We have two existing culverts at this location. They are very large and, in the past, have worked quite well. One of them is beginning to settle because of erosion underneath the pipe. New head walls and toe walls are required for this structure. We estimate the cost i c ti'. 'k S• i i Aponda No. Lloyd V. Harrell January 15, 1992 Apondaaom__W6 _ Page 2 a lle of those to be approximately $12,000 with city forces doing a large amount of the excavation and fill activities. We believe this solution will remedy the situation for quite a long time. However, ultimately a new clear span bridge will have to be built on the order of the bridge on Woodrow Lane. This would be a major bridge with a cost of at least a half million dollars. We would recommend the $12,000 option at this time. The third structure is at Hobson Lane and Fletcher Branch. We estimate the age of this structure to be 20-25 years. There is a ; way to repair this with some new wing walls and toe walls and pumping some concrete under this pipe also. However, because of the age of this structure as well as the use on Hobson and the continued development in the area, we have also estimated the cost of building a new structure. We would do this with some precast "crown spans" that would allow us to build a large clear span opening for this structure. It would certainly meet some of the needs in the future and at the same time, would give us enough size to facilitate the sidewalk and other improvements that would be needed in the area, This solution, however, is much more expensive. We estimate the cost to be approximately $115,000. However, we feel that this size investment would last us for a long time. Therefore, we would recommend rebuilding the structure. In conclusion, we see the total of the three projects costing us approximately $187,000. We have two options. We could issue C.O.'s or we could include it in the street bonds that we are about to advertise for sale. After visiting with John McGrane, he felt that the street bonds would probably have a little bit better rate and would also let us spread the debt service out for a few more years given the difference in the life of the C.O.'s and the normal 20 year life for the bonds. We would suggest the street bonds as the best alternative, in any case, we would certainly recommend that the Council consider selling C.O.'s or street bonds to facilitate these improvements. If you or the Council has any further questions, I would be happy to try and answer them at your convenience. Rick Sve a Deputy City Manager RStbw AMMOOOBB i i i , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -.CITY = COUNCIL) ooo~pogP ODoooo pp v DO d J CZ] O~OC~~~~4QCll L' G4~~~~~pJ t~ Aljonda No. _-A`n sotuftvn aM A~onda Item [k1ltl 1 ~~i ` tnapprertatidnof '4xoRl. aALVanx" WHEREAS, Murl Calvert is retiring after 35 years of loyal and dedicated service to his community and WHEREAS, during his tenure in the Denton Police Department, Murl has Consistently served his above duties beyond the more o discharge trustworthyo and extremely faithful manner) andal, WHEREAS, Murl Calvert has steadfastly devoted himself to the highest d not only ind professional work, but in the work of those colleagues who were in- ° fluenced by the outstanding example he set for them on a daily basis and WHEREAS, Murl Calvert has consistently demonstrated the kind of dynamic leadership and unselfish service to his community which has helped firmly establish the City of Denton as the upper vertex of the "Golden Triangle"I and WHEREAS, those of us who were influenced by hianleadership, en- dwill continue to miss him greatly, deavor to live by his fine example! NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTOMs That the sincere and warm appreciation of the City Council be formally conveyed to Murl Calvert in a permanent manner by spreading this Resolution upon the official minutes of the City Council and for- warding to his a trus copy hereo PASSED AND APPROVED this the a day of , 1992, BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYO ATTEST! JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BYs APPROV AS LEGAL FORMs DEBRA A. ORAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BYi i i1 j. V:. ell i is 1 Agonda No. Agonda Item- Me 1_.P?l hi naPrUlt1flun flf III" SPLAAN" WHEREAS, 'like" Splawn is retiring after 31 years of drsdicated service with the City of Denton since his employment on January 16, 1960; and WHEREAS, during his career with the City, "Ike" Splawn has maintained an attitude of cooperation with and dedica- tion to the stated goals of the Electric Utilities, Electric Production Division of the City of Dentons and WHEREAS, "Ike" Splawn has exhibited outstanding expertise, dedicating much time and effort in assisting with the work of the Electric Utilities Electric Production,. Division and has shown great spirit in encouraging community involvement In the best interest of the citizens of Denton; and WHEREAS, "Ike" Splawn has always served above and beyond the mete efficient discharge of his duties and has responded to his duties in a loyal, trustworthy and extremely faithful manner, in a spirit of cooperation with his fellow employees, and in the best interests of the citizens of the community; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTONs That the sinoere and warm appreciation of the City Council he formally conveyed to 'like" Splawn in a permanent manner by spread- ing this Resolution upon the official minutes of the city council and forwarding to him a true copy hereof, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ~I 1992, BOB CASTLEBERAY, MAYO e ATTESTS JENNIFER WAClI'ERS, CITY SECRETARY BYs ~ AP PRO D AB TO LEGAL FU Uts DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BYS i ry 1 iy i :CITE COUNCIL: T - - - - - m T, - - - - - -T TT Lf T ooantiao ono 1 O ` ~ p o ~ v ~~QOCnocooG° ! it- I z h 3 4 DATEt 01/21/92 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT hgenda No, _ ' TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda II anl_, ~ FROMt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager Rly SUBJECTt FOOD LION DETAILED PLAN RECOMMENDATIONt o The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-1) at their meeting of January 8, 1992. ~VMMARYt Request approval of a detailed plan for a portion of Planned 'O Development No. 72 for the purpose of a retail grocery store on a 4,116 acre tract of land located at the southeast corner of N, Locust Street and Windsor, adjacent to Strickland Junior High School, BACKGROUtgpt See P&Z Report. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEAt Neighborhood, City Departments, DISD, Citizens of Denton FISCAL IMPACTt N/A ylldv Pre aced byt +J~%'+~iY►~1.L./ Marrell City Manager Kar n K, F hari Jrb n Planner A oved ^ ` v ank Robbins, AICP Executive Director Planning and Development AXX000B1/l ~ v i' 1i Aganda No. d0 Agonda Ilofrt 0,3 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT Tot Mayor and Members of the City Council came No.: Z-91-021 Meeting Dates 01/21/92 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Resolution Trust Corporation P. 0. Box 1307 Denton, TX 76201 Current Owner: Robert Marshall Goodwin and Marshall, Inc. 6001 Bridge Street, Suite 100 Fort Worth, TX 76112 (Project civil Engineers) Requested Actions Approval of a detailed site plan in a portion of Manned Development No. '72 for the purpose of a retail grocery ~7tore and off-premise consumption of beer and/or wine. Location and Sizes A 4.116 acre tract of land located at the southeast corner of N. Locust Street and Windsor, adjacent to Strickland Junior High School, Surrounding Land Use and Zonings North - PD-72; (duplex & multi-family residential) South - Agricultural; Residential (single family) East - Agricultural; Residential (single family) West - Agricultural; Residential (single family) Denton Development Plans Low Intensity Area C y i F t~ l} 4 Monda No. Agenda itenn-j1o;-.1 {Case 5-91-021) Cufo --r-L--X page Tao /A . /I i SpEcIAL INFORMATXON Transportation: 1. Locust street is designated as a primary arterial. Five (5) feet of right-of-way on .N. Locust is to be dedicated in order to make the right-of-way 50 feet from centerline. Right-of-way on Windsor is adequate. ' 2. A right turn lane from Locust onto Windsor, as required, is acceptable as shown on the Detailed Plan. No other street improvements are warranted as Windsor is already improved and Locust is a state highway. 3. Sidewalks are existing on Windsor therefore, the developer is required to install sidewalks on Locust only. 4. The driveway locations, as shown, are acceptable to the Engineering Department, utilities: the Waters north side of Winch water line is available indsor. There is a 12 inch water gline along the west side of Locustt however, this water line is available only by boring due to its location on the opposite side of a state highway. Sewer: A ten (10) inch sanitary sewer line is available on the north side of Windsor. Fire-, Additional fire hydrants are required at the northeast , corner of Windsor and Locust and also approximately 300 feet south of the intersection along Locust. The proposed hydrant on Locust may be from a :six (6) inch tap off of the existing 12 inch water line on Locunt. The hydrants will be installed at the developer's expense. C L H .t agenda Agonda Item (Came 2-91-021) [late a 9 i 140 Page Three Q.~ e SPECIAL INFORMATION - Continued Electric: A four (4) inch PVC conduit shall be provided by the customer from the transformer pad to the edge of the property line on the Locust Street side. Also a one (1) inch conduit will be required from the transformer pad to the metering box. Landmcapings , In accordance with the Landscape and Tree Preservation ordinance, a minimum of 20 percent streetyard must be landscaped. The 4 proposed detailed plan reflects 30 percent in streetyard landscaping with an overall of 18 percent for thm total site. In addition, because of the close proximity of the residence to the south, the applicant is proposing a bufferyard with a six foot high "brick crete" screening wall. The screening wall will follow the property boundary along the southern and eastern portions of the tract and will terminate inside of the property near the northeast portion of the site. in order to provide partial screening from the neighbors west of Locust and north of Windsor, the applicant is proposing three (3) foot high berms supplemented with trees and shrubs. Drainages The on-site detention pond is generally acceptable; however, the applicant shall provide drainage calculations to the Engineering Department for their review and app.,-oval prior to final plat approval. A HISTORY on April 17, 1984, the City Council approved the rezoning of Planned Development No. 72 from the Agricultural District. PD-72 consists of 127.484 acres of land and is almost entirely north of Windsor Drive. The 4.116 acre tract located south of Windsor PD-72 was approved for a mixed-use development consisting of: 60 acres SF-7 lots 24.7 acres Duplex/4 Alex C It S Y Ci Agenda No. C=_D~~Z _ (Case 2-91-021) Agenda item_lp,L~ Page Four W1u HISTORY - Continued 16.1 acres Multi-family 10.0 acres Floodway/Open Space *4.14 acres Neighborhood Service 9.0 acres Garden Homes On July 16, 19910 the city council approved an amendment to the boundaries of PD-72 by deleting 0.196 acres from the district and adopting a revised concept plan showing the new boundarieS; changing the zoning on the excluded land from PD to SF-7. On January 8, 1992, the Planning and zoning commission recommended approval of this detailed plan; however, they requested that the City council look into the street parking situation, a left turn lane on southbound Locust, and that close attention be paid to the berms, as shown on the Landscape Plan, not be in the site distant triangle (5-1). ANALYSIS The site is located in a low intensity area, according to the Denton Development Plan. These areas are primarily intended for the protection and preservation of residential neighborhoods, The Plan does however, allow for nonresidential uses as well, subject to the following policies; 1. Strict site plan control within 1600 feet of existing low a density residential areas, Comments The detailed plan submitted reflects sensitivity towards the surrounding neighborhood by the increased landscaping, bufferyards, and screening being utilized. 2. Traffic design to ensure that multi-family and nonresidential uses have access to collectors or larger arterials with no direct access through residential streets. Comments Locust is a primary arterial as well as a state highway. Windsor., according to the thoroughfare plan is designated as a secondary arterial. C t. h 1 4 Agooda No..__,l 'Q Aganda ItoarY (Came 2-91-021) Otto page Five ANALYSIS - Continued 3. The o,%;.,rall density/intensity standard is not violated. Comments According to the PD 72 plan, this particular site has a land use designation of neighborhood service. At the time of approval of PD-72, 2691 intensity trips based on average were allocated (4.14 x 650). Because the detailed plan reflects square footage, a reduction of 728.4 intensity trips occurs (32,710 sf/1000 x 60 = 1962.6). 4. Sufficient greenspace, recreational facilities, and diversity of parks are provided. Comments Thirty (30) percent of this site is landscaped within the st'.reatyards. The overall landscaping of the site represents 18 percent. 5. Input into planning by neighborhood associations and councils is encouraged. This policy is intended to generate input and not veto power. Comments On December 19, 19910 a neighborhood roxeing was conducted by the applicants at City Hall. Approximately 20 citizens attended. The neighbors immediately adjacent to and in close proximity of this site were pleased with the design but had concerns pertaining to drainage and traffic. A few other citizens who reside outside of the immediate area vvoiiced concern of traffic and drainage but were basically opposed this area being Strickland Junior High gas mainly well as elementary schools in the area. , 6. Concentration/Separation According to the Plan: "Neighborhood service centers are small nodes of nonresidential establishments ifevelin Thesecenters convenience gooldsband services at the neighborhood l 1 >4 I r Agenda No. 2~ i (Case 2-91-021) Agenda Item`- N Page Six Iblo 7 ANALYSIS - Continued located at least a half-mile from any other non- residential/reteil center. The size of non-residential centers vary from 2 to 5 acres depending on their access to a specific category of thoroughfare." -Direct access to primary or secondary arterial--maximum 3 acres. This specific site was designated as "neighborhood service" via PD-72. With regards to the traffic concerns, the applicant has submitted a traffic impact analysis (TIA). The Engineering Department has analyzed the report and finds it acceptable. The results of this TIA indicate that the intersection of Locust and Windsor is currently operating at an excellent level of service and Drill continue to do so after the proposed site is constructed and fully operational. In addition, an evaluation of this increase in vehicular traffic volumes on Locust and Windsor with respect to the school pedestrian environment indicated a very minimal impact. The additional 50 plus vehicles that are anticipated will travel on both streets during the afternoon dismissal period and will not necessitate any change in the existing school area traffic controls. The right turn lane proposed on Locust at Windsor will assist in mal.ntaining a level of service B while assisting school bound , traffic in turning at the intersection, Also, the additional sidevralk shown on the site plan along the west property line will cert&inly aid in improving the pedestrian walking environment in the area immediately adjacent to the school. In regards to the drainage concern, the subdivision ordinance requires the developer to adequately handle site drainage. The applicant has chosen an on-site detention pond as opposed to major off-site improvements. C M r. n y (Caere Z-91-021) AgonoaWo _ /y ~ a Page Seven AgonUa Ilom wto J a te- - -g RECOMMENDATION Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval (5-1). The Planning and Zoning Commission requested that the City Council look into (2) issues when considering this detailed plan. R 1. Possibility of a left turn lane for southbound traffic on Locust. 2. Restricting on-street parking along Food Lion's frontage on Windsor. In addition, they requested that staff pay close attention to the site distance triangle with regard to the proposed berms. Since the Planning and Zoning Commissiop meeting, DISD has met and asked that the Council consider the following conditions: 1. Temporary fencing shall be placed around the site 01iring the construction phase; 2. There will. be no deliveries allowed by trucks that weight more than 12,000 pounds between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m, and 2:30 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. Staff recommends that these conditions be adopted with the ordinance approving the Detailed Plan, DISD also asked that a fence be placed around the detention pond. Staff feels this condition is unnecessary because water will stand in the pond for a short period of time and would detract from the aesthetics of this open space. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition 2. Approve petition with additional conditions 3. Deny petition 4. Delay consideration c, E ti a~ r Agenda No. '7--- (Case Z-91-021) AgondaI160_ Eight Page r ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Detailed Plan Reduction 3. Landscape Plan 4. Ordinance approving PD-72 0 5. Traffic Impact Analysis 6. P&Z Minutes of meeting held January B, 1992 7. Ordinance A AXXOOOA4 1 Ifr I , I i I' ATTACHMENT 1 Z 91-021 Food Lion NondaM M. Agonda I,elrl__1~~ v---- IM0 NORTH \ \ L_~ UU ~ w1K~ROL1f ' KING R cr, LAO" 30D WA w ~ p<ai~l~~~ III ` ~ 0 C 'l *BIO®• VI A4■ hwwrrar ~IE ADD1!_4 Eti~RS ~ Y MR, ~ r }AM-lib HM i 1. M d6 ~NARJ m, 'li~oe~~ao~az ~ C,7 ~ w,rmsoR f RT I C ~ l N 9R001C CDt 13 W I ~i 1Y i a NVNDSDR Q 'ill l._. EME I 1 4011fMIDOG I L--_ - - f M • G L 4 ow O -imam ji~~--~? r °,a SITE o 40 DDITION SfRAi~_.. A pgty[ _ ~ ~ 2 OI ~ [ACM , ,Z"/'/~ kA f ~ F M ~ OyEtM lM yL~.-~ a /F~1RGid~+48 ` _HWY, 980 . -a + tJ c CA%FUS caar~ Arwo~L - r l(-l~1 L I II //~I ail, DATE: 12/27/91 SCALE; NONE J w, F t~ ATTACHMENT 2 ;j Z 91-021 Food Lion Ps7onUa Plo. _ ~ OAe/; Agenda IICns-F_~ (late 9~--- NORTH - - - - - - - - - - _ .ae+. ur auc - - - --arcs 80 FT Row WINDSOR DRIVE _-890 TQ)-3QL E - ---436 89 ~ w r rr.u M _ ~ rr e.anisr. j N III E s, 1 ly U SUPERMARKE F o p 32710 50. Fr. o~ ~ ZONED PD-72 1 ~ J 73 bm Cit TE}lIAY1 l u c1 o ' I E 1 AWA a ' o b V N 89° 18 35 w y 432 78/ OO M1 on un XW /rr Rl( ' 004r~Crur' l0((xix091l AlN /I,rfln cIW EUGL-NL' RLAGG VOL 319 PG ,358 ORDCT DATE: 12127/91 SCALE: NONE ,nlrlrr - Irwrlc. I ..n Fncl.al.~uw.~l rw rw. E „ , „ urr~rewlrlw~ FhMR t~ I~~n A FFrr . p G~ 1 aflw pC.4I Mrv T1 YM Flalrl L Irr For•r M Frr p N rat of INIr ~ a wawa.nrr wtww nee•rn, & AW41..VIriUlrlrl MFrle. WINDSOR DR I VF, aue •.rrmrrrrs~~rr r~ ¢.1~rww~r~vM w frwe •on.~r Frww~~rv ww~ IrIN~a~ 1 ra, i r ►`I~~ ~ h T ~--~J ~ ~ _`~y,~ FYI •1"jNrjrjFllrYW1~~~0 H lM pY11~ r £V r~• ~ - fn e~rr"wr ~rW ~FIN~YN ~rM ~1~Mr1[~IN InMlai n•rv M rrrlr WMrlA00W JT11Tf1111-~1 fTl I7T @"~ ' s W MarIW.f ~fv[rus ~1nLrR~YQY IM f ~W~ 'YI•rlr~plrllMa1M •n vaewa~.u MYr1~NOlYYrlaMtlr111~rII1ar~Lr~01`r M _ ~ 1 •e0r MM aFS~url~aa KI I Y~ - ~ ~ ~ ti W raellnle no•Ilea MFrI ru r rlwr ~ ~ . EH z - SUPERMARKET A 32%10 S0. FT. ~ I ~ ~-I ~ II JI 1J iI1 .,I is In-I" LANDSCAPE PLAN of tho f I ~ I~a - 7 rl, I DETAILED ME PLAN II I I n /77-~I~~~~T~~I ,A , ~ 4.116 ACRES IN TNL Tf _it n I BBB k CRC C SURVEY rrnLy~"7~ I ABSTRACT Me. {16 rune ns ac rrrfwaleaF 1 SITUATED IN THE i a n I+•eare Fnarf YREYARfO dY~ 1sOODN CITY OF DIATOM, DINTM COUNTY, TEXAS 1 y l ENI * AiARSHALLI XM ACOLISIW A AEVELOPAENT •atnnwro~p ~1I1 ,riw Ir¢rnur ICI(Mo Ml now nmuv Ir. aA MYtrM' Krlm" - K"V*" 003 WALNUT IiL LANE. SLITE IO HVM, TEXAS 75038 Yar• Ilifi IIP 011 {t ATTACHMENT 4 korrda No. Aponda I(om_~~/~' ~L AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING HAP OF THE CITY OF DENTONr+oTFJ~CAS,/-~~ ' AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF r THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AND AS SAID HAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 127.464 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE B.B.B. & C.R.R. COMPANY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 186 DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; AID DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. The Zoning Classification and Use dosignation of the following c described property, to-wit: TRACT 1: All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the N 4& C.R.R. Company Survey, Abstract No. 186 in the City and County of Denton, Texas; the said tract being all of a called 100.695 acre tract and part of a called 40.891 acre tract, both tracts described in deed from J. Newton Razor to Jesse Newton Razor, at al recorded in Volume 541, Page 654 and 655 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; the said tract being more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING for the northwest corner of the tract being described herein, at the northwest corner of the said 100.695 acre tract, said point being in the east right-of-way line of. F.M. Highway No. 2164 (North Locust Street) at its intersection with the north line of the said B.B.B. & C.A.R. Survey, northerly 26.3 feet from an iron rod found at a fence corner; THENCE south 89°28'26" east with the north line, of the said 100.695 acre tract and the north line of the said B.B.B. & C.R.R. Co. Survey and a distance of 1401.66 feet to an iron rod set for the most northerly northeast corner of the said 100.695 acre tract; THENCE south O1°18'34" west with the west line of the said 100.695 acre tract a distance of 2558.55 fact to a fence corner; THENCE south 88°02'08" east along a fence a distance of 312.31 feet to an iron rod found at a fence corner for the moat easterly northeast corner of the said 100.695 acre tract; an old fence 497Nfeetothe southeast corner along g the said 100.W acreptrac.tgand A the longotheesamecorner a course, inhall~ia totall discre tance tract, 1026.32 nfeetito an iron rod set for corner in the north line of Windsor Drive as monument on the ground; DriveEa distancea4of 310709 48 feethtohan said north o~! found in of the neast right-of-way line of F.M. 2164 (North Locust Street); THENCE north 00°23'00" east with the east right-of-way line of F.M. 2164 and the west line of the said 40.691 acre tract, passing at $65 its northwest corner, same being the southwest corner of the said 100.695 acro tract and continuing along the same course, in all a total distance of 1072.26 feet to an iron rod found at an sngte point in the said line; THENCE north 01°28'46" east continuing with the east right-of-way line of F.M. 2164 and the west line of the said 100.695 acre tract Z-1626-JOE BELEW-PAGE ONE I- st R A,,, n Ilern_„ ~ a distance of 2526.52 feet to the place of beginning and enclosing 123.352 acres of land. [x~a TRACT 2: All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the C.R.R. Company Survey, Abstract No. 186 in the City and County of Denton, Texas; the said tract being a part of the called 40.891 acre tract described in the deed from ,1. Newton Razor to Jesse Newton Razor, et al recorded in Volume 541, Page 655 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; the said tract being mor- particularly described as follows: BEGINNING for the southwest corner of the tract being describes herein, at an iron rod set for the southwest corner of the said 40.891 acre tract, said point being in the east right-of-way line r of F.M. Highway 21,64 (North Locust Street); THENCE north 00°23'00" east with the east right-of-way line of F.M. 2164 and the west line of the said 40.891 acre tract a distance of 410.97 feet to an iron rod set in the south line of Windsor Drive as monumented on the ground; ,,,,d THENCE south 89°40'30" east with the south line of Windsor Drive a distance of 438.28 feet to an iron rod found in the west line of the tract described in the deed from Jesse Newton Razor, et al to Denton Independent School District recorded in Volume 535, Page 558 of the said Deed Records; THENCE south 00°53'08" west with the west line of the said Denton Independent School District tract, a distance of 413.71 feet to an iron rod found at an angle point in the south line of the said 40.891 acre tract; THENCE north 89°19'00" west with the south line of the said 40.891 acre tract and along a fence part of the way a distance of 434,65 feet, to the place of beginning a..id enclosing 4.132 acres of land. is hereby changed from Agricultural "A" District Classification Uas to Planned Development "PD" District Classification and Use under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas with the following conditions and specifications: 1. Sixty (60) feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for Bell Avenue. 2. Final utility layout, street nltgnment, curb cut and , driveway locations, and overall plans for access shall be determined during the site plan approval and/or plat processing stage. 3. The floodway/open space area (with exception of the drainage channel), landscaped cul-de-sacs and entries shall be privately maintained. The City of Denton must review and approve a written proposal or agreement outlining specific maintenance responsibilities before building permits are issued. 4. Duplexes fronting Windsor Drive shall be single story and must conform with normal City of Denton zoning ordinance requirements. 5. Single family section shall conform to SF-7 zoning ordinance standards. 6. Unless otherwise approved as part of the PD proposal, the multi-family section shall conform with MF-1 zoning ordinance standards. 7. Specific site plan approval is waived for all two family and single family land use; specific site plan approval is Z-1626-JOE BELEW-PAGE TWO R - Agenda fdo - Agenda Ilom_?b _ required for multi-family, neighborhood service and g. V-- home ~eensections. 8. Pedestrian bridge extended across the floodway/open space l~ by use of dam required for the detention pond. f 9. Sidewalks along both aides of Bell Avenue. one sidegof pall sides 10. Windsor Sidewalks Drive; sidewalks along developer interior streets shell be required throughout the development. 11. The development shall conform with the approved PD concept plan. 12. If 25 percent of the development, with a minimum of 5 percent single is not developed within five 5 years, zoning ill rover to its previous agricultural classification. ~,~p ,t I The Zoning Map of the City o DentonA'a, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix Co the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, under Ordinance No. 69-11 be, and the same is hereby amended to show such change in District Classifica- tion and Use subject to the above conditions and specifications. SECTION II. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect immedi- ately after its passage and approval, the required public hearings havingthheretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission and e City Council oL the City of Denton, Texas, after giving due notice thereof. PASSED AND APPROVED this the /T day of 1984, ✓ A CI OF ENTON, TEXAS ATTEST; /4c~ CHARLOTTE ALLEN, Cl'rY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM; C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXA BY Z-1626-JOE BELEW-PAGE THREE C_ x I ` I II Ni IICU1.96 I c4ry I i AV r1 A nda I o 16.30 ACNI IN T 1W 080 49" CO lu11Yt`f g 43I _ l_. _ L9~ ~9 cm a eauNn OF oiKroN, T1:lIA4 I SINGLE FAMILY ` b AifMi I,iYY It llH,LNI I 1 S 1 AI 1 J ~-,,,,FLOOOWAY/OPEN SPACE ~-w i 10 ACii• fIAROEN HOMES IiNgY-IAM~r ATr►1WM w+.1aNr f Aeon v Iwnu +M'r . ~ M4NIv 'y i MULTI-FAMILY 0~ x Y MKAW MNA/NM 1 I AMlti 14CbiI-OWW ~ 1 YI.+MK111. I X11 'MNOfOM IE~ ~ y~Cti~ ~ gECEnr~O~ :LIMm • A•1♦ AM* j 'I '^~ll, .wf Slwl~IwlrJlll W++?.a19 ~I wfrlrl rlr+rl~lwl wlY+L]IW.~1✓NRIIIIw Ir+l}It~lc~~rlrfwl Irlr+.~+r Nl \ C Y~ g Fe FI r( ATTACHMENT 5 ~a'002 ° _ Agenda No, TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOOD LION SUPERMARKET DENTON, TEXAS a Prepared for ARTECH DESIGN GROUP, INC, Prepared by a JOHNSON, BRICKELL, MULCAHY AND ASSOCIATF',S, INC, CONSULTINC ENGINEERS C ti w it ~i I, f M1 CONSULTIN J11111MAIIENGINEERSG Johnson, Brickell, Mulcahy & Associates, Inc. 17440 Dallas Pkwy. Suite 242 December 31, 1991 Dallas 0. 75287 (214! 38U•1453 agenda No. Mr. Phillip M. Abell r~- Arlech Design Group, Inc, r1(lenda Ilem__ , 1303 Walnut Lane, Suite 110 italil ~_al~~ Irving, Tx 76038 - o Dear Mr, Abell: In accordance with your request and authorization, Johnson, Brickell, Mulcahy and Associates, Inc, has completed a Tragic Impact Analysis (TDV with reference to the proposed development of a Food F+' Lion Supermarket to be located in the southeast corner of the intersection of N. Locust Street and Windsor Drive in Denton, Texas. DEVELOPMENTPLAN The proposed plan contains a food store of approximately 32,710 square feet and provides 164 parking spaces. There are wo access points to the site,, one on Locust approximately 400 feet south of Windsor and the other on Windsor approximately 300 feet east of Locust, Figure I has been included which depicts the proposed site plan, Our discussions with your ofce have indicated that as part of this development a right turn lane will be constructed on Locust for vehicles desiring to turn east onto Windsor. EXISTING CONDITIONS Locust at this location is a two lane facility and is designated as FM Route 2164 while Windsor is a four lane City street, A simple two phase traffic signal installation controls traffic operations at this intersection, Strickland Junior High School is located on Windsor just east of the proposed site. Classes begin a between 8:00.8:16 A.M. and dismiss at 3:16.3:40 P.M. School area tra/j`ec controls include an adult crossing guard and reduced school speed zones that are in effect during the morning and afternoon school beginning and dismissal periods. DATA COLLECTIONS The Consultant collected peak period tragic counts at the intersection of Locust and Windsor that would also coincide w4h the school peak periods. The time periods counted were 7:30. 8:30 A.M. and 3.0 - 6:00 P.M. Attached to this report ire summaries of the vehicular turning movements for the peak hour periods of 7:30 -8:30 A.M, and 4.46. 6:46 P.M. (Figures A-1 and A-2 respectively), In order to determine the traffic that would be generated by the proposed food store, the Consullani counted entering and exiting tralric volumes at an existing Food Lion Supermarket that is open and fully operational. Herhorl J. Johnson, P.E. - Gerald L, Brickell P.E. Edward J. Mulcahy, R.E. - Dannhe R. Cummings, P.E. - James V. Dickinson, RE. Brian G. Larson, P.E. - Frederick D. Schmid, P.E. Thomas 0. Swenson, P.E. - Timothy A. Chalupnik, P.E. i / Kansas City, Missouri • Des Moines, Iowa • Dallas, Texas - 01alhe, Kansas 0 Minneapolis, Adlnnosola / 7 + C . 1 y~ 1 S~ Agonda No. Allond/Iate~~ijjfi_~_pp~J We ~ ~ 1 bruts~a ~oorr~s .rrr3aNad.iav a'oirr~u J i 100HOS rl9J! N~n'r~P OrrV7X.~llllS . ~=n. nra+n.usooslw ur.~,... 'Fd-.•,vG~...19'100 5 f/ 4111. N " ;,7 rrrr ~ i :2y fi Nk" 04 W' 0- ~....u~~ AIDtI ;l_a UG / Cigur. e 1 .a 1Y I I I f 80 FT ROW 0 - ---WIRDSOR -DRIVE AJ6 69~ I I TWO I I l I! 1/~ ~ P )-71 i r ~ I T I ~ `c' f1 \ 11 i SUPERtGi' VK 32Al0 $0T. va , 19 l 02- TT7 r U) CL PROPOSED SITE PLAN O~ N ~ 1 That facility is located in The Colony and the following table summarizes those counts. it should be r noted that only the afternoon peak period was studied because the morning period generates minimal traffic volumes (approximately 20°l0 of the afternoon peak period). Agenda Ho. ~tom._11.. Food Lion Supermarket Agenda Wie The Colony, Texas 4 Jr1 4f Enterin Exiiin TimePeriod 100 - 4:00 P.M, 107 ill 103 100 4:00 . 5;00 P.M. 107 109 6:00 - 6:00 P.M. TRIP DISTRIBUTIONS AND ASSIGNMENTS The vehicular trips anticipated to be generated by this ,ievelopment were distributed to and from the site based on the existing traffie patterns at the intersection of Locust and Windsor. Figure 2 illustrates and at stud the rcent) utilized the ibution the wh to Figure 3 llustrat sitheevehicular traffic as ignmentsnasrdistributed by thetConsultantriveways t Attached to this report is Figure A•3 which summarizes the proposed traffic volumes of the intersection of Locust and Windsor during the P.M. peak hour. These volumes reflect the existing traffic volumes plus the proposed traffic volumes. ANALYSIS AND EVALUATIONS The Consultant performed a capacity analysts of the intersection of Locust and Windsor under both the existing and proposed traffic conditions utilizing the PASSER 1187 software developed by the Texas Transportation Institute, The following table summarizes the results of the capacity analysis. Capacity Analysis Locust and Windsor P.M. Peak Hour Volume I Capacity Delay Existin Proposed Existin P_ronosed LOCUST; Northbound ,31 (A) 22 (A) 6,7 (B) 9,4 (B) Southbound .16 W .23 (A) 6,0 (B) 9.6 (B) A WINDSOR: Eastbound .28 (A) 22 (A) 12.8 (B) 8.8 (B) Westbound .17 (A) .14W 12,0(8) 8.3 (B) INTERSECTION OVERALL: g,g (B) 9.0 (B) All Approaches NIA NIA vehicle. The proposed condition Note: lnaludes the proposed Northbound right turn lart¢ of Locust. f9. l 1 x i I I I 80 FT ROJY 5 84'40'10' F _ x36.99' II r I , ~Ic~ I f I li: Ir a ~ , , 1 ~ sbr..eua' KEr 1 3210 50. Fr. ,a ~I I l"' !1 ~l II I za z ze i! o . 4~ Uri ® ~?t~ ~ i (\/Y O i ~I I I / I w I l ate. ~ i, ~ l` f ~i~~ f ll I. t' RfEEA: !y c v m m w I PROPOSED SITU PLAN N ,I r 3 s cZ Thal facility is located in The Colony and the following table summarizes those counts. It should be noted that only the afternoon peak period was studied because the morning period generates minimal traffic volumes (approximately 20% of the afternoon peak period), Aganda Food Lion Supermarket h000da ItOm _-L2 J l~ The Colony, Texas Wtv Lime Period E terin Exiting V 3;00. 4;00 P.M. LT 1 4;00.6;00 P,M. 103 107 6;00. 6;00 P.M, 107 100 + 109 TRIP DISTRIBUTIONS AND ASSIGNMENTS The vehicular trips anticipated to be generated by this development were distributed to and from the site based on the existing traff~ patterns at the intersection of Locust and Windsor, Figure 2 illustrates the distribution patterns (in percent) utilized at the studied intersection and at the two access driveways while Figure 3 illustrates the vehicular tratlo assignments as distributed by the Consultant. Attached to this report is FigureA.3 which summarizes the proposed traffic volumes at the intersection of Locust and Windsor during the P.M. peak hour, These volumes reflect the existing traffic volumes plus the proposed traffic volumes. ANALYSIS AND EVALUATIONS The Consultant performed a capacity analysis of the intersection oflocustand Windsor under both the existing and proposed traffic conditions utilizing the PASSER 11.87 software developed by the Texas Transportation Institute, The following table summarizes the results of the capacity analysis, Capacity Analysis Locust and Windsor P,M Peak Hour Volume / Capacity , Relay EisProposed Exl Pronose LOCUST; Northbound .31(A) 22 (A) Southbound .16 (A) 23 (A) 6.7 (R) 9,4 (It) 6, 0 (A) 9,6 (8) ' WINDSOR; Eastbound 28 (.-V 22 (A) Westbound ,17 (A) .14 (A) 12.8 (B) 8,8 (Lt) 12,0 (II) 8.3 (13) INTERSECTION OVERALL,- All Ap-roachcs N/A NIA 9.6 (ll) 9, D (B) Note; Volumel capaoffy is a unitless ratio. Delay is in seconds per vehicle. The proposed condition includes the proposed Northbound right turn lane of.Locust. t~ ~r s 15% 1 ~35% '4------- 20% KO-Fr ROW J~^ 20% < 20% WIJYMOR. DnI VE 30% 300 -0-30/ ~ B9~C0' 0' F ,_,_536:84' Il 30% 5/, II ~ f i I~=I ~ r ' I I -RjfA ;I ; 1 t = 'ti 1 32710 50~ FT. r it 15 I i t' l l ~~~~y~ l~ A it - ~ 1 I I j ~l I1 . 1 ~ ~ ~ ..I~ I ? ,f 11 Il f I ~Qr n a } 'TEVIpI Iv? V) C to w. A-10% M. 35. aro ~ G ti DISTRE3U'TION PATTERNS 15% I35% PM Period a 5 IT91 iirt~ I1 J n l~0fldn tVe. ~;~QZ o Agenda Flom S _ //n o M RJto _-~k 19lN15l0 TOON~S 1N30N9d.l0,'I h'01N}U 1/ f / TOOH.7S N.OfI ~ION'M CbVY7NOf1/I S' hLy'CIG r 1 rr. r.°+n.ueo..~rarv~ Jh.'•.vG l!'i "00 5 P • m r aft ~ Y li a:•" ..~~~..N.... ~ tyl". ids, f , w a4 0 1 h, , y ,.,IL.. w 00 o H W M I in 04 _ +r, ..III J•,. ~ to PO')IV ~3 ,ICYZ'I';00"f7.. a " M ..4 ^~r Mod .,t.J 06 _ rnau...rA.~ lfl o 0 0 1 1 ✓..V, F'igLlre 2 t { 1 5 { 1! panda tlo A~onda ftenF f N Data C4 M ~ jQ N YYYY , f 1911!!510 VOWS 1N301y3d%(I'I NOlN3U 700,95 NOt/ UO&r aNV771~fUIY ~ IMM~1 -.NIV aM IdI'UI ...~•M.".'I'~i if .f19 5 Ir' u + IL ~ a -A 0 Z 44 o 1, Le) 1,4 1 IF, Lr) -14 Al. 00 M I~ _~".:'.•~~•""'.~--...'''_"Y"_ iC^LI 00....11.........- - 4 O ...,.y.., I N N 7 Figure 3 \y 4 7 /f ] 7 I38 151 L _ J~--FT. R019~ 22 _ 22 22 r 32 f--519 1,71RIDSO60 R D~'1VE A( 32 34 2 3 34 - aac.a~ 30 32 27~~~ , , ! i ~ i I,1 1 I. I I ,I ~IYI, E } h. I c, s PeRwi'PxEr 3 710 SO.~ Fr. w - ! I j 11~ ~.~1it Z FO2x526 } TA. I l r I 4q 17 yCL N N vo ~ ~ O TRAFFIC ASSIGNMF,NTS N N ~ w 161 Development Traffic 40 4:45-5:45 PM Peak Hour Ci r. 6 1 Attached to this report for your review are computer printout summary sheets for the AM, peak hour existing conditions, the P.M. peak hour existing conditions, and the P.M, peak how' proposed conditions. The Consultant has determined that the critical operational period is the afternoon period from 3:00 6:00 P.M. which covers the peak school dismissal period of 3:00.4;00 P.M. and the peak street traffic period of 4:46 - 6:46 P.M, The following table Indicates the traffic volumes that will be added to both Locust and Windsor during these two critica! afternoon periods: A comparison of the two will reveal that they are almost identical. The street pe,7k values are those illustrated in Figure 3. Food Lion Traffic Volumes P.M. Peak Period 0 Street School Peak Street Peak &P-r. ach 3:00. 4:00 P.M. 4:46. 545 P X LOCUST; s Northbound 39 40 Southbound 16 16 Total 66 56 WINDSOR; Eastbound 32 32 Westbound 22 22 Total 64 64 FINDINGS The results of the capacity analysis indicated that the intersection of Locust and Windsor is currently operating at an excellent level of service (LOSA to B) and will continue to do so after the proposed site is constructed and fully operational (LOS A to B). An evaluation of the increase In vehicular traffic volumes on Locust and Windsor with respect to the school pedestrian environment indicated a very minimal impact, The additional 60 plus vehicles that we anticipate will travel on both streets during the afternoon dismissal period will not necessitate any change in the existing school area trafc controls. , The right turn lane proposed on Locust at Windsor will assist In maintaining a LOS B while assisting school bound traffic in iurningat the intersection. Also, the additional sidewalk shown on the site plan along your west property line will certainly aid in improving the pedestrian walking environment in the area immediately adjacent to the school, k;anda (lo _ ~~-(2Q _ Agnnoa Rom_..._QQ WWI- .f, lY2Vi.9.Y~ ti CLOSING We have appreciated the opportunity to assist you and the Food Lion organization in the preparation of a Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed site plate in Denton. We hope this report will satisfy your needs and answer any questions that you or the City may have concerning the impact of this project. Please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions or comments concerning this report Again, thank you for allowing as to assist you with this project, Respectfully submitted, JOHNSON, BRICKELL, M WARY Pyenda IJa. o2'OD Z AND ASSOCIATES, INC. AgEntla Itam ° Dannie R. Cummings, P.E. Principal Engineer 1 Attachments A C k, MEMO LANDSCAPE SUMMARY +~t BEET YARD: 1129763 SO. FT. STREET YAP 40% LANDS( LANDSCAPING REQUIRED: 22rW3 SQ. FT, NORTH 15 0 15 30 60 LANDSCAPE WSWED AREA PROVIDED: 34,034 SO* FT. n, l f~. f t 1 w; . TREE REOUI REQUIREMENT FOR STREET O(C MGH EaJAI.5 TFRTY T YARD ID 51 TREES f TREES PROI -XS PROVIDED IN STREET YARD tD S2 TREES i i AREA Of ST EA OF STREET YARD PARKING 83,084 $Q. FT. r 5% LANDSC) LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT 41154 SO. FT. ERIOR LANDSCAPING PROVIDED IN -NDEOR f DID I VE INTERIOR STREET YAR IEET YAFID PACKING A 970 qn FT 07) !-P& OAK 2 VV- 3' GALPER, d-b PT, H6H rGleercvs 5 fr P1-ANW Dfv /W' 5TEM B96M (TYP) (3) BRAOPOM PEAR (TYP) -21-1 V2' "I.PER, 6' - b' (2) LNE OAK, 2 V2'- Y GAl r&, 6-10 PT H6H PARKING SP 2 FT: EARTI-EN GERM d'!'~+'+ ~ (Qu~rcys fr»~'lar~i~l WD 0WARF MWORD MAILY 5 6AI, 36' HIGH ON 34' CENTET9 F i t , !'~naoa~ve~ 5tyrac,"uo} 'r r a ~I r t i r~ Rr _~-L_ • A _ I  •u n ! Y 5 FOOT RECEIVED DEO m JAM 0 3 f992 /W5TEEI- 1 k~ EOW I LFLWING & DEVELOPMENT KPARTMENT PUM E H0AEY5ULk1E WOL^V LOVER N ALL 6LAA09 (TYP) 4' POT5.. 12' ON CENTER avvice a J~rarrcR chneers) LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET 2 of 2 I I HC 1 f U.-ti of the DETAILED SRT E MILAN -ire for I , 4 o MS ACRES 13,60' ' ~ ~J, 22 FT. t-AtV%APE tX 99ER j RN THE 003 & CRR Co. SURVEY I 0) ACAOFORO PEAR t4) 01*ARP CRAPEMYRn-E L ABSTRACT No. R O S 2' 21/2' CAI-PM D' -b' i H .1 6AI.4 4 PT 4' CENTER5 (Fran cdery*W a-y otroeow i" SRTJATED RN THE 1 •P! tra. T!"1 t t f,+,rwT*% Y t71* tT'1 t \,.r "m l-%% r ,ra .}1.f1 m V M" n F ~1r+ "I nF A An F I. I s' 1W WALL 0FT EAST OF ROW 6 Ft, HIGH 08RfCK I F 4 1 1 _ ~u r• ■ r r r a I i f • i I l a li u r w I F ' i r Yorp~~! /AM yASKII~, t►,wrw M40rLt f o kp 0 WA*40IU El.k~t,A/h . Si t,Bdbhlb I ✓ktf '+~Jhnl Nbie~~h ASuttow~l~+.titt CGtlk r~V0.TLk . ~UWIJc •Lk/tk1~t~M Ftawciu, Li^tirt•or~~i A Gkpha. kL•M CEn otiL i ~IHnI 7+111tiJ(, OvnnF ur«ia~Nb 1~ P-tA o0..K G~kAb nn4GTb# NA PwA &444-01.6 "u'( b k4~b JIrN10to. Or~Mr-N Sur~Wr,~ ffdLL'k ~ I f. t a.. 6.. g _ f - ~ - 0I y r ~ ~ H• .p L i _ ~.r ~ ~ ~ D FFoti0 1144kY 6WkPU V06lf0 ♦ 1 i- hLVkWL NNiOIA "r' a f LL_ r (.klk MOM----- 0Wkga hU 931 l~} :Srkit,t011 tfr c ~aT l~~ i PirhOar~f►rAti i t fM13uN10tA . M r_r l~ i a 1~ 1 L~ . L Y 1 f l IL i Ga6Ptt Lkhf ~'J ' h r3 ~~1 fro, i L~ _ ~ . a 1, G . i 1 r a L ` ~j:- L L f  F0 I,l E g A S , u lo oa,L. LIIIJJIA~, PiSrKt~~9 • own+~► N,w a~vN AvALP `fobpNrj Gk0A4. (,►h s 4c ~al~nl6 Ewa jLvvrvuvte Y v Pu,~ A pY141 ' MrM.I J'R4HiNk YOJIIAI ova gup ova gup s, n~ ; d N►WY vwwr bkFWAL c OAZ et,m aea ~0 kovPct,1 ' NI`4G b ~`~ht~S . ?'_pt~ OtiQp s 9*~A DtiK. Chi, 0wltI-F b41-" XO HoL If 's (0 /CL o''o.c. D%Ikf-r %10%JOU) S v^L 3a"o c S LkOha.ic~,rV1 2`(G1kL . 4Wk. LccbQVAti1~'E!~ 1 bA4 w G14 P PLA~ s 3 n.c ~AIAI I~ ry~l~~ I.hGf, bkP 1AA-2.4 ib~tY Sr" L -S' b. C pi lLt, oGt-tcCo~,Ot.X. 3 B?-4DFVfzo FW►ft , y~~~hc. . A,s~A►:1 Z)1%5tAIWL 4"Pur Io O,ar.i fv,J rT kK nS I t C.fffNtSG PISt ►tt~ . SCAO-W " IL,t.&Y bI a. c. ~cLI~A-$ At 5 y ~j FwwF,rL►Nb G(Lr1A noPt,t ? z'(c,~~ • DwhR-t AL t4tvm aivk 14A Le GR-tGP+~ fV~`~R-1`Lr.Mutti+ +k- -Wf+. TAM Jvol(Ofitof I& M.. S'v C. 7 7 `LO~PS(V r+ull'; r~v~X l5-I+. r.+auvr+t. co~.VA. Puy ~o•u.~. NArm0 ►/4 SbPrL Z PUROI.~LRr-rtf PW+V1 7•"c ►t L 8' v.c . YA¢p ftp~ 156 • I•k+~0~'w~G IFG~A of tirkkr Y1~24 = l9 ~S`i sa Ff, on. 5(,'/. cF src~t Y►wo 'TV-t ID"rA L PkR-wrAp h14A vr.- 1LrA4.0 tIoob Sri F+, aA b% OR t.L /~a-r, +►1. nt o r ^ v ~ tiJ d S~ o v b . PA4vIN ~ A96h of HOW SWARD 3 1964 soar by, I5% X NoN~S~-rr yattp PIA-A1 ~yk W 1i.1. ~3k fiEiMVOA G✓2Nlj! NON RW YAKD = 12'975 S A Fr Scnt,L `rr=.. r 6LQ YEA i A" DcAr.(T~~G M~ar►S i4a~ ►t.3; ?IL~.PAti4D WIN ;.ir,~ lw~g dr vtnt^gotS 0 rue O(LA%t• w/tN O.Af{ ¢,AGv r,.cc.I I i Agenda No. N unda Itom___~ From 7; (A,w To y of -wv Day o w o-k ~ rz/r9/~I ~ Date INDICATE NORTH 9 3?- 7 7 Z-7 Z W; ,,(I 32 STREET 1 ~ X07 A•JfllO A N cY C} JBM JCNNtCM, YtICK[LL, WACAN'r kM A~welkt , cMrnly lyw..~ ~11 .n~C ~-1 C ~y4 wl h i o S A ~I o- o, y 3 Z! 1 ` ' - STREET c 46 4 y ,^y D N la Ll N w ~i s N r~ LO - z A 1 C5 ,l 1•+ _ _1 Y, q~q t' A 11 ,~L Agenda No, 17 Agenda Ilnm__!l ll~~ From To .4 P.M.) ~n eclNesdu~ oy o WIsk 12. 1r3L9 In INDICATE NORTH M1 M, lstl 29 +rsz - 170 IZ 1~.1 .I~or STREET 173 ~ g I s~ U ~ nJ N S ®M JOHN ION, wCKUL. PMJICAHY yN AIµtilt1Sil 11, IM. CW,Niy 94+.01 3 J r e c a K i) i-,oc.UStnncl ~rJ, cl Mandat4 _ Z Apa~.._ rFLun~~ N~iAlo+oin/I'Y Ira nda Itom-A~ ~r ~ r1 P 41 P~•~t Rita -97 ~ from (r,M,) To l oy o W-4ik INDICATE NORTH c t~1 umm" C. J Z w4-~ - 0 STREET Z lp~ Z 7-0- low _ 27 - 54 r ,v I fv + w - ~H 1N Je JOMION, WWMLL, WKCAHY - wd Aiwal,ly, ti i 6 1 l ~ 4`\ r. I c w o N o slow 3pr tj l^ -7 LZ b V . FUf fi, c.~- J`,, STREET ` !Z $WN ~I s In Gf ~ ~ <o 0 5 ° j3 ~ m v~ N ~ E O z m~ ~ N c is Agonda Ilom-~ iI::XAEi Dl l IIFiVT .i! i n (lIU f'i1DL IL IlTT VIiR t.i.! i JL, 138 ilR IT-O/ 7"I(JL'FIt'I1A'iti .1! fL.i"'i ll "':S.il ::,SiJUh, 015101 M:$ PASSER-07 Erb! I"<'n,"l "WIN 901A.JII M 1:;I.Jf"IMARY ***;X A*mr 114T. t 0 OLC OFFSC:T t'L .'C 1 0.73E t3rfJ 3S DUAL. THRUS (^+h) Wir-dsnr PHA`;I EEO IS FiUtil- THRUS M 08) ARI ER."Oi_ EiT K.f-"1' ER0,51"3 "j'HU'6a C',ONCI.IRRENT F H(-)E'. 24 h 44.0 ; i-H 3+ 7 TOTAL. PHASE' 'riml (SEES) _0.1:3 <::1.2 ,•t-! i:! 21.:' F-HASE. TIH1- (%y 611.7 r! t• 0 ? _,"i..: c.r',.11!F:r:•; OIT~ FI I L.i-;l'I:VIa`E(ti; F'HAaE: {NEhtla) c HF?f_ DAiI l J l 7!::11 S FHASE I)1F,:FC'fION Nlro-TI f1 I ! I' i FE''IJIkU G9L-fFM WB'Ih3RU 1!1 ftl.Ll 'ff+I I! Yi I`dI -'I-IA`SL: TIME (iEQ) i N 1 2. ii 2 1.„' rn ; C!ti C!i! V/C•-T:ATf 34 EVE.L OF SERVICE t A A DELAY (SECSIV01) U 1 a 1`'.7 U 14.7 l-EVEL. OF S(::RVIC6 A b 1i UUE.JE (Vf?)i/L61N+:) 7 .7 .!:t 1.. 1 i`FGFS (IiTOPS/HR) O. J, 7. 7, ?I. 1'",. Cr. 19fl. No T0f'AL 1MrFi0 C;f OI`i D11 -F1Y 1111H1H[JH DE:L.AY (,YCLE. [3i'J(-11 30 SECS E r i_01gs m! I:`' iaumv. r+F 51 . `3C1L.N) fE:.>:O7 DE ARTIMI;11I IIi, tl!r ~,hlrJ f'1J1:0._[C; 'i',.ANBk UF:fA'fIOPJ PASSER II--FI'I MLII_'fIE'HFul: A I,.:flM f''(.1FJFESSION - lnL,lM VER 1.0 7UL 88 ).'q Kk I:',i :'f f='F?Llbf I ;F ION! 1011T'iCaPJ SUMMARY k*** AJhER R7 **1 INT. 1 V SEC, OFF` ET IRT i f'HAUf- '>T':fa 15 DUAL l'HRUS (:.+h) Wl nd'ar~r t! IJiI: F),E f f't1A3iE; 81.:0 15 DIJa1L. YHRU5 (A+13) Afi'fE:fiTFiL- CROSS STREET C{.'1MCIJRREIgT PHASES 2+-6 1.6 Li'; IlJttl_ 'd+ aii :5+7 TO AL PHASE TIME (5EC5) 6, 1 .0 a ~.:,.9 , 0 ' - 9 F'I-IASE TIME 6Cr.2 U Diu.';; i.rJ f! °~.fl ! f_TF'' l.f f l..(';T'IVE IIEi _r, PHASE {MEMA) 5E 11 6 1F.1-1 iL17 4 7C1J B f-HOSE UIR:E:CTION NDLIf M i3FiTHRIJ (,j('. call-TF'M ldH'FIIf;3J PHOI,IJFi. T1. ME: (SEE) C. :?h,9 V/(,' .-RAT 00 le, C!I) 1 C i ::'E3 +?C! .17 I.CiVEL Uf= III=EiVIC;fS A A A A Of-LAY (SCC /VEEI) 0 fa.i! C! ;.„7 0 121. 1.3 cf i. .i) LSL VHL. OF C;CiF!V1M } E' 2 V G (I l"llJr11E (VE:HI1-.C1Mf:) .+J! • • ~ • ' 5 {iTOF'E; (S1MPS/HEM:) Q. i. 17.1. 101 Tl)1'l)i- Y hI f t E"C:; V Cih! iil t.0I, Ili (H 1 ILTI DG!.-AY CY(. I-E J.6 ISfJC;fii'JI'}I 108 BEEF) lratrt; Dr I' irtmuni: of H Ji'iu inrl rmi!lic,: frtut,pc!rLatiun V 1 MIT No Y, a QQxU } 4 (1 11 k Ail.f.;f 517LNi ~ ` TEXAS DF:I Flf !1fk::{11 OF Li AAji 'I 51 ND PUP A.C II r1Nt F'QIITATION (15E1I Bl I°IUI_ T IFHAhE M l f:'il', li M. 1~.0G _.1F ON J 4: 1 C?1 VE.F' 1.. 0 71.11_ E3E FIlSfh-07" DLsI FItilRb5?1IRI 1:}111UT 1'0N 11 PHI) WY I Y.~ k INT. 1 U GEC, DF F )F E !?f T ; F,HiA I CIED IS DUAL '101RUS (;:+b) 41.ir)d:..nr 0 Y. TIFF 3E1 t ! 143 T Pl-IAP „}EU U. DUAL- 'fHkUS (11+G) (-SI'i'lCI~:1F1L. '11TtE:.C'i' Cf";:C}:IU ISM EE-T '":OOKARiRE:'i T PHASES +E.; 06 i 00 TOTAL R 1-t3 fi ' r7 Tl T(iL 11-1ASf. T 1.I,IE ( SEC ) 29. :i F"IASI.. 1 IME. I%J X11). r % 1 u 51 I I I /1.tI FI f04SE:. Lf I I&C I' 101\1 WWI,, I I TI _J.; U : I .1 1 I II{l,l LJI:+i 11'1 I_Ii I lil 1.1 ti 11(.' 1 1*1 WJs 1'1114) '+1ASSE TIME (SSE) .V (s . t_I -'3G„0 /(.-,'--RAT 10 i1i:' )C is l )'9 Ii Vf.L CIF SERV I U.. I-1 A Fl t.r EI. C,:.:LAY (SEC£i/VEH) Ai E3.0 JUELIE (VEI-1/1_ANM (i 41 C? ! V .4 r0F'G (3-riw,s/FIIt) 161. lp.i. fil"E'F11. l; l ! } F'+Ir.l + i:NN I M_F;Y 1.111MI NUM DELAY CYCLE 1,0 .07RUVEF1 26 BECS r'I'po Si' : ITT ! ( l'. i.i •a'4. 1.1!"il 1: C) iql?71L1 Alionda No. ~2- Aflollda 1IOrI1---__ Ql1o .i ATTACHMENT 6 DRAFT Minutes PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION A9ooda No. Z January 8, 19%191 Agenda llonL_._ _ Wto The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of /tgle City of Denton, Texas, was held at 5:00 p.m. on January 8, 1991, in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 215 E. McKinney. Present: Jim Engelbrecht, Ivan Glasscock, Judd Holt, Mary Evelyn Huey, William Kamman, and Fran Morgan A Absent: Roy Appleton III Prevent from Staff: Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning and Development; Karen Feshari, Urban Planner; , Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney; Owen Yost, Urban ° Planner; and Todd Parton, Planning Technician Chairman Holt called the meeting to order. ~I. Food Lion a. Hold a public hearing and consider a detailed plan on a portion of Planned Development No. 72 (PD-72). Twenty property owners were notified within a 200' radius; 3 letters were received in opposition, 2 in favor, and 1 undecided. Staff Report: Ms. Feshari stated that the petition is a request for approval of a detailed site plan in a portion of PD-72 for the purpose of a retail grocery store with off-premise sale of beer/wine. It consists of 4.116 acres located at the southeast corner of North Locust and Windsor, adjacent to Strickland Junior High School. The , surrounding land uses of the site to the north is PD-721 a portion of which was recently taken out of PD-72 and zoned SF-7. To the south, east, and west is property zoned Agriculture which is used for single family residences. Locust Street' is designated as a primary arterial. Five feet of right-of-way on North Locust will be dedicated in order to make the right-of-way 50' from centerline. Right-of-way on Windsor is adequate. The applicant is required to install a right turn lane from Locust onto Windsor. it is acceptable as shown on the site plan. No other street improvements are warranted as Windsor is already improved and Locust is a state highway. Sidewalks are existing on Windsor; therefore, the, development is required to install sidewalks on Locust only. The driveway locations as shown are acceptable to the Engineering Department. Water and sewer are available to this site, however, additional fire hydrants will be required at the northeast corner of r `t T D Al P&2 Minutes R IF January 8, 199J~i Page 2 Agenda No. Windsor and Locust and approximately Soo' south of tie intersection along Locust. In accordance with the Landscape and Tree Preservation ordinance, a minimum of 20% streetyard must be landscaped. The proposed detailed " plan reflects 30$ streetyard landscaping with an overall of 18% for the total site, Because of the close proximity of the residence to the south, the applicant is proposing a buffer yard with a 6' high brick Crete wall along that property line. This screening wall will follow the property boundary along the southern and eastern portions of the tract and will terminate inside the property near the northeast portion of the site. In order to provide partial screening from the neighbors west of Locust and north of Windsor, the applicant is proposing 31 high berms supplemented with trees and scrubs. There will be on-site detention; however, prior to final plat approval the applicant shall provide the calculations of the pond to the Engineering Department. On April 17, 1984, the city Council approved rezoning of PD-72 from Agriculture, it originally consisted of 127.4 acres of land. PD-72 is approved for a mixed use development of single-family lots, duplex, four-plex, multi-family, open space, neighborhood service, and garden homes. On July 16, 1991, the city Council approved an amendment to the boundaries of PD-72 by deleting .196 acres from the district and rezoning it SF- 7. This site is located in a low intensity area according to the Denton Development Plan (DDP). These areas are intended primarily for the protection and , preservation of residential neighborhoods. The plan does however allow for non-residential uses as well subject to the following policies. The first policy analyzed is strict site plan control within 16001 of existing low density residential areas. The detailed plan submitted reflects sensitivity towards the surrounding neighborhood by the increased landscaping, buffer yards, and screening being utilized. The second policy is traffic design to ensure that multi-family and non-residential uses have access to collectors or larger arterials with no direct access through residential streets. Locust is a primary arterial as well as a State highway, and Windsor according to the Thoroughfare Plan is designated as a secondary arterial.. The third policy is the overall density and intensity standard. When PD-72 was approved, this particular site was allocated 2,691 intensity trips. It was based on acreage. Because the detailed plan reflects square footage, there is a reduction of 728.4 y 4. f 4 P&z Minutes p D DQenda No.. R IF January 8 , 199001, Page 3 Agenda ROn1_ wig intensity trips. The fourth Policy is sufficientgreen space, recreational facilities, and diversity of parks being provided. As noted earlier, 30% of this site is landscaped within the streetyards. The overall landscaping of the site is 18%. The fifth policy is input into planning by neighborhood associations. on ° December 15, 1991, a neighborhood meeting was conducted by the applicants. Approximately 20 citizens attended. The neighbors immediately adjacent to and in close proximity to this site that were at this meeting appeared to be pleased with the design but did have concerns pertaining to the traffic and drainage situation. A few other citizens that reside outside of the immediate area voiced concern about traffic and drainage but were basically opposed to this area being retail, mainly because of the proximity of the .school. The sixth policy is the concentration/separation policy. According to the DDP, neighborhood service centers are small nodes of non- residential establishments intended to offer mainly convenience goods and services at the neighborhood level. These centers shall be located at least 1/2 mile from any other non-residential retail center. The size of non- residential centers vary from 2 to 5 acres depending on their access to specific categories of thoroughfare. Direct access to primary or secondary arterials according to the plan is a maximum of 3 acres. Since this specific site has been designated as neighborhood service through PD-72, we do not consider that this policy is violated. With regard to the traffic concerns, the applicant ;,as submitted a traffic impact analysis. The Engineering Department has analyzed the analysis and finds it acceptable. The results of the traffic impact analysis indicate that the intersection of Locust and Windsor is currently operating at an excellent level of service and will continue to do so after the development is constructed and operational. In addition, an evaluation of this increase in vehicular traffic volumes on Locust and Windsor with respect to the school pedestrian environment indicated a very minimal impact. The additional 50+ vehicles that are anticipated will travel on both streets during the afternoon dismissal period, and will not necessitate any change in the existing school area traffic controls. The right turn lane proposed on Locust at Windsor will assist in maintaining level of service B while assisting school-bound traffic in turning at the intersection. Also, the additional sidewalks shown on the site plan along the west property C JV i r, Is P&Z Minutes h n ~ January 8, 19*1, P{~onda No. "--U L Agenda Item Page 4 [718 lines will certainly aid in improving the pedestrian walking environment in the area immediately adjacent to the school. With regards to the drainage concern, the Subdivision ordinance requires the developer to adequately handle site drainage. The applicant has chosen an on-site detention pond as opposed to major off- site improvements. on question, Ms. Feshari explained that the DDP allowed a four acre neighborhood service center in 1984. It has changed from that time to now. At the time PD-72 went through the system, they viewed that maximum four acres as being acceptable, that's why it didn't violate the policy of the plan at that time. The definition she gave earlier of neighborhood service centers is verbatim from the DDP. There is no definition of neighborhood service in the Zoning Ordinance. The only definition is in the DDP. Mr. Kamman asked if there will be a left turn lane off of Locust for south-bound vehicles. Ms. Feshari said no. Mr. Kamman asked if any congestion could be anticipated. Ms. Feshari replied that the applicant hired i traffic engineering consulting firm and they did an extensive impact analysis on the site. The Engineering Department reviewed it with them and did not anticipate any problems at that location. Ms. Morgan asked what "generally acceptable" means. Ms. Feshari answered that it a standard phrase. Mr. Engelbrecht asked about Windsor being four lanes, it is currently striped for two lanes. Ms. Feshari said that it is large enough to be striped for four lanes. Mr. Salmon said that it is currently striped with more than two lanes at the intersection and is only striped as two lanes further to the east. The pavement is wide enough to provide parking on both sides and hava four lanes of through traffic. Mr. Engelbrecht asked if parking will be continued on the i n 1 ii i. P&Z Minutes January 8, 199 Aq~nda No, ~5 Page 5 ApandaRoml* Dato south side of Windsor once this facility goes itt. Mr. salmon said that the street is wide enough to have parking plus four lanes of traffic. He ar:3umes parking would still be allowed on the street unless it became a problem for some reason. Mr. Dngelbrecht said that going through the intersection it becomes confusing as to whether there are two or four lanes. It will becore a similar intersection to the one at Malone and Univeralty. Will the developer be required to expand the striping? Mr. Salmon replied that it has not been required up to this point. The street is functioning at a good level of service and this particular development does not add enough traffic to the street to warrant any additional improvements. Mr. Kamman said that he thinks parking in the street by a curb cut would create a problem by blocking vision. Mr. salmon said that there is an ordinance requiring people to park so marry feet away from driveway openings. That is enforced through the Police Department. If them are a lot of problems with on-street parking in front, of the facility, it will be looked into. It would take an act of City council to remove the parking. Ms. Huey asked is there is a potential that parking in front of the "1 1 4. ,'t t have to be removed. Mr. Salmon 0 d was referring to the parking in front of th, A, If. Petitioner: Architect. Design Group, stated that he rte the developer of Food Lion Grocery stores. a on the north side of this site running east Locust is on the west side running north and south. Two entnancesi are proposed into the facility which meet the minimum setback requirements of the City. An attempt to screen the parking lot by the addition of ^ome trees and a hedgerow atop a berm has been made. In addition, they meet or exceed the landscape requirements of the City of Denton which are quite extensive compared to other areas. The store itself is approximately 32,700 square feet. 164 parking ~f ry \ . r t v , l 7 ;i rP&Z l Jan Minutes Aponda No. January 8, 19!,i( Page 6 Agar3tla Il~e~m___, spaces are being provided which exceeds parking requirements. The detention area to the south will detain all the on-site water. Through proper sizing of the pipe and release of that detention water, they will not cause any water problems downstream. Food Lion has built an 850,000 square foot distribution center off of 4 I-35W near the Alliance area. They are currently looking to expand that center. It will serve the existing stores in the Dallas-Fort Worth area and those that are currently being developed throughout the region. Denton has long been on a list of sites to serve. Food Lion typically creates a competitive market and food savings could be as much as 0 overall. If Food Lion can serve food at a lower cost, the other stores can too. That benefits the local con:-;umer more than anything. This store will not be a 24 hour store. Out of their 900 stores across the nation, only 1 is a 24 hour stare and it is adjacent to a submarine base. Food Lion wants to be a good neighbor. The School District has been contacted to find out their concerns and another meeting has been scheduled with them on Friday. They have not expressed any major concerns at this point. A six foot screen fence will be put all the way around the store which will forca the children to use the sidewalks instead of cutting through the parking lot. They are also installing a sidewalk along Locust. There will be one internally illuminated sign that meets the sl.gn ordinance. Ms. Huey asked if the grade of the land will remain the same. A Ar. Abell explained that there will not be a retaining wall. The land currently slopes from Locust to the east property line. They will have to depress the parking lot somewhat, The greenbelt will remain at its present grade although there may be some amount of berming to facilitate screening. A public utility easoment will be dedicated to facilitate future City expansions. Ms. Huey asked how the depression on the west side and the berming will impact the drainage situation. Mr. Abell replied that it will essentially not be impacted at all, Currently anything that falls in Locust runs in the borrow ditch on either side of Locust. That will not be effected. Everything that falls in their h { P&Z Minutes January 8, 194, Agenda Mo. _ Z _ rc I~ II~II Page 7 a IlomZ, ' CUta area will be directed to t.,eir detention area for holding and proper release. Ms. Huey asked how the detention area works. Mr. Abell said that it is like drainirry everything into an empty swimming pool, filling it up, and then releasing it with a small pipe at a flow rate designated by the City. For the most part it will be an empty grass area that is dry and then only fills up with water in the event of heavy rains. r Mr. Glasscock asked how much business the store will have. Mr. Abell said that he is not aware of the projections. He showed a picture of a complete store that is next to residences and a day care center. Mr. Engelbrecht asked if they would have a problem establishing a no-parking zone on the street in front of the store. Mr. Abell said that they do not have a problem with that. It is really a City matter. There is parking across the street and there is parking at the school as well. Mr. Engelbrecht said that considering the fact that there is a larger amount of pedestrian traffic, mainly younger children, there is one down side to the berms in terms of line of sight. He asked if they had looked at the berms in terms of their, line of sight onto the sidewalk from the driveway coming out onto Windsor.. Mr. Abell said they could provide any type of sight triangle for the berm. They initially put the berms in the area for scrAening but they can be adjusted. Mr. Engelbrecht asked staff to take a look at the berms with regards to the line of sight at Windsor because of the large amount of pedestrian traffic. There needs to be a good line of sight there. He also asked if there are problems with children at this facility, does Food Lion feel that the school district is responsible for the behavior of those children on the Food Lion property, Mr. Abell, said that he cannot speak directly for Food / 3 Y. k ;i 7r Q tl P&Z Minutes kanda No. January 8, 199, Page 8 Agonda Itom_ Lion. It would be his interpretation that they would not hold the school district responsible for anything. Mr. Engelbrecht asked if there were problems would they call in the school district or the principal of the " neighboring school. Mr. Abel said yes. There will be a manager of the store and the goings on in this site will be his responsibility to handle. His first inclination would probably be to meet with the principal of the school and see what could be solved. Mr. Engelbrecht said that he has a problem with that. When the children leave the school they belong to the parents and the community, not to the school. Food Lion chose the site knowing the school, was there, and it is important to establish up front where everybody stands in this relationship. They are not the responsibility of the school district. Mr. Abell said that things such as loitering and vandalism are civil matters and they will. be addressed as such. In favor: Giles Gowing, 2906 N. Locust, stated that he has lived in his house for 35 years. In his opinion, anything that is good for the city, school, and county, he is in favor of. He lives right there by it. Donna Jeans, 3101 Cedar Hill, which is the second cul-de- sac across the street from Strickland Junior High. she also owns property at 3105 and 3107 Cedar Hill, 3100 Inglewood, and 3104 Inglewood. She has spoken with her renters and they are in favor of this project. She would like to welcome Food Lion to the neighborhood. If they do choose to build, she will build another duplex of probably $120,000 value, on those additional lots that she has. Mrs. Blagg, owner of property to the south of the site, said that she is in favor of the development. They need come kind of business out there in that part of town. she is not against it. in opposition: Tom Woods said that he lives on Teasley Lane but he is representing his parents that live C t l' P&Z Minutes R Jan anuary 8, 199,, Etc fl~ Page 9 Allem_- di rectly across the stre.~et from the proposed have several problems with this. Aside frornthsite, They e benefits to the people that plan to build, what benefit to the neighborhood is this going to be. There are more cons than pros when the teal picture is looked at. The increased traffic is a minor portion of it. There are left hand turns out of the driveway going across two 0 lanes of traffic. How will that be provided for. It is v creates a ery close to the intersection to begin with which children VeThereng.isoua lacktofn a especially turn with school off Locust. When Loop 288 is opened up there will be more traffic down Locust. It is currently a one lane road. Are there any plans to widen it? There is no guarantee of the success of this business. What happens if the business doesn't make it. People will have to look out their front windows at it. He doesn't' know of any other buildings near residential areas in town that have a facade like it. Windsor is a secondary arterial but half of it goes through city parks and school zones. The rest of it to the east is through residential area. Are there any plans to upgrade it to handle the increased traffic? Along with more traffic comes noise. There is also problems with businesses being located near a school. There will be vandalism and graffiti. It will be an eyesore. It does not make sense to him that "-his business is going to be so small in a remote location. It they project that much business then why aren't they going along University or Loop 288. There is no data for review on their sales projections. Was there any consideration about putting this up closer to the Loop where it would seem more appropriate? Those intersections are more likely to be commercial. The people living just south of there will change their mind when they try to get out of, their driveway in the mornings. He sees the same situation where he livc,a at on Teasley and I'-35. He is also concerned about depreciating property values. This will not do anything for the homeowners. The majority of people there are homeowners, not renters. Vickie OrFelein, 205 E. Windsor, stated that there is no question that Food Lion retail grocery store will be a boost to the Denton economy in terms of discount prices and new jobs. At this time, she has legitimate concerns that need to be addressed before Food Lion is built in a residential area and close to two schools. She is ~f \ c w lk el 0 P&Z Minutes January a, 199 r~Qortla No. 9a5 Qom? Rr) /I y Page 10 A F T concerned about the affects on property values in the area. She has heard conflicting things from realtors. She has heard depreciation and appreciation. I£ the property values do increase, will taxes increase? Will future zoning be commercial or residential. she moved there to live and she wants it to remain a residential area. There is a moral issue and a problem with the sell of beer and wine in a residential area and especially by a school. She foresees a problem with the traffic congestion. With increased traffic is the potential of automobile accidents. From a local supermarket survey, it was fund that deliveries are made from 6 AM to 12 PM and additional deliveries are made from 3 PM to 5 PM in the afternoon. This will be a lot of congestion around rush traffic time. There is also a potential for crime. Will there be local police tc patrol the neighborhood or will Food Lion provide their ow,t security. There is also the potential for the parking lot of Food Lien to be come a local hangout. That can be seen on University Drive every night, especially on the weekends. She has a problem with that. In light of the above concerns, she emphatically thinks and feels another site should be selected. she presented a petition against Food Lion be allowed at the proposed location. Recommendation; Ms. Feshari stated that staff recommends approval of Z-91-021. Mr. Holt asked if there is any place in town where there A is a supermarket in a residential area. Me. Feshari said that the Food Lion locations in the Metroplex usually try to go into the neighborhoods. Staff evaluated the square footage as oppose the larger supermarkets. Some of the other chains eare much larger than this as a general rule. in speaking with the representatives of Food Lion, they will work with the city on hours of operation. The Commission could place a condition on the hours of operation and when deliveries can be made. Ms. Huey asked if the beer anr: wine issue could be separated. Ms. Feshari said that the reason that had to be included is because in the table of permitted uses, beer and wine is listed separate from retail uses. That's why the t ti P&z Minutes eq,tjcla FT January 8, 199 Aenclallom___ Page 11 application says a grocery and the sale of beer./wine for off-premise consumption. cities can't impose stricter requirements than what State law imposes. Food Lion will exceed the minimum distance required from the school. Ms. Huey asked if Food Lion has indicated that they would accept restrictions on delivery hours. Ms. Feshari said yes. They usually get deliveries in the morning. Ms. Huey asked if there has been any indication of the feelings of the School Board, Ms. Feshari said that representatives have met with members of the school district but they have not met with the School Hoard. They could not get a meeting together before the one on Friday. Rebuttal: Mr. Abell stated that Food Lion has never had to close a store due to lack of sales. Food Lion has typically expanded at a rate of 20% per year for the last five years. Basically they are doing it with their own cash. The traffic on Locust is a big concern. it is a State highway and as with all roads and highways, if the load increases because of development north of this area, that will be taken into account and the road upgraded accordingly. He is sure that this will not remain a two lane roadway for another, 10 years. In relation to the sale of beer and wine, the manager will strictly prohibit the sale to minors. Such a sale could cause the liquor license to be revoked. There are two methods of delivery. There is the large tractor-trailer rig from the distribution center of which one visits each store every day. Typically the tractor-trailer comes in, drops off the trailer, and picks up the trailer that he left the day before that is loaded up with scraps to be recycled. The second trunk is a refrigerated truck that may or may not come every day depending on the demand of the store. They do not typically come more than once a day. The only other servicing is a parcel pick-up zone in front of the store that is used by bread vendors, doll and doughnut caters, and special deliveries such as chips and soda pop. Those would be small step van or UPS type trucks. All deliveries are made during store hours. Typical store hours are 7 AM to it PM. The traffic analysis that was performed coincided with school pick- Y. r ~ \_J i ~j 4 P&Z Minutes Benda No. ° DR A T January 8, 1999, Agoil 11om _ 12 (I'l n~~e UP/drop off times and rush hour. The maximum peak hour of shopping in the store was projected to be between 3:45 and 4:45. That equated to 55 cars within that hour on Windsor generated by the store. That is less than one per minute. Some of those people will be dropping off ' kids. They will already be going up and down the street. It is not really an additional car on the street, it is just a car that is going to use the store. Food Lion hopes that neighbors will be shopping at the store and not criminals. Graffiti is a civil matter and will not be tolerated. The manager will look to the police department to step up patrols, etc. Most cities have ways to prevent loitering in certain areas. Food Lion wants to be a good neighbor and is not going to put up with any abnormalities that other stores wouldn't tolerate. chairman Holt closed the public hearing. Mr. Gngelbrecht stated that in regard to the concern for pedestrian traffic, there is school related pedestrian traffic in areas worse than this around town, and to data there have not been any problems. Malone and University is a similar situation with a convenience store on the corner. They sell beer and wine as well. They have two curb cuts on each street. In addition, the students cross another parking area which is one giant driveway. There has been a concern about that for years but there has never been an accident. The traffic count is at least as high or higher, The Food Lion site is , interesting in that the other three corners are secured from commercial development. There is a park on two corners and residential uses on the third. The only additional traffic in the future will be from Food Lion and Loop 288. That will not be anywhere near the traffic counts at University and Malone where there is retail on four corners. They have not had an injury there that he knos.,.4 of in the last eight years. He has also spoken with people in the grocery industry, and from what he has heard, Food Lion has a good reputation financ,tally, as an industry leader, and for location management. He does not feel a great concern that they will leave this location because of financial problems in the near future. He believes that the landscaping will provide visual protection for the neighborhood. He would like to add a recommendation that a no-parking zone be established along the entire frontage of this parcel on f ,v c, v. ~I ~s Jan J~J JJ`! L, P&Z Minutes Jauaxy 8, 194, Adonde No Page 13 Agonda lion) _ j-gy-- ~z Windsor. Therefore he moved to recommend approval of 2- 91-021. Mr. Glasscock said that he does not think traffic is going to be bad at this location because it is a middle school and not a high school. He seconded the motion. Mr. Engelbrecht clarified that his motion included a recommendation for a no-parking zone along the property on Windsor Street. Mr. Glasscock asked if the ordinance to prevent parking to close to a curb cut would eliminate most of the parking in front of the store. Mr. Salmon replied that the ordinance only prevents parking within a few feet of the curb cut. Mr. Engelbrecht said that he did not intend to limit delivery hours. It will quickly become evident to the manager and the drier as to the best delivery times. They are not going '.o want to get entangled in traffic. An off-set of 15 to 20 minutes can make the difference in missing the traffic. Ms. Huey said that she knows that Windsor is a mad house for about 30 minutes twice a day. The rest of the time it is rather quite. But during that time it is very serious. A Mr. Engelbrecht noted that the loading dock is on Windsor. Mr. Holt noted that there is parking all along the street when there are night-time activ'ties at the school. Mr. Engelbrecht said that the activities cause pedestrians. Windsor is four lanes and there could be parking on the other side of the streets. He just thinks there is a problem when people have to see what's on the sidewalk and then across a line of cars as well. Mr. Kamman said that the recommendation is that the City council think about the situation. Mr. Holt said that the grocery seems to be more than just a neighborhood service store. It will attract people i P&Z Minutes N6nda No. January 8, 19411 Agondaltaro FT Page 14 r a from further away. Piggly Wiggly is in a neighborhood and it does create a traffic problem. 9 Motion carried (5-1). Mr. Holt voted no. b. Consider the preliminary plat of Lot It Block 1 of the Food Lion T-2 Addition. Staff Report: Mr. Yost stated that the site is 4.116 acres. The public improvements being offered by the applicant include one off-site fire hydrant on Windsor, one on-site fire hydrant, approximately 410 feet of sidewalk along Locust Street, and a right turn lane from Locust onto Windsor. The plat conforms to the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. The Development Review Committee recommends approval. Petitioner: Robert Marshall stated that he is the engineer and surveyor for this property with the firm of Goodwin aid Marshall at 6001 Bridge Street, Fort Worth. He is ava;.lable to answer questions. Mr. Engelbrecht moved to recommend approval of the preliminary plat of the Food Lion T-2 Addition, Lot 11 Block 1. Motion was seconded by Ms. Huey and unanimously carried (6-0). III. Hold a public hearing and consider the preliminary and final replats of Lots 75 and 16, Block 4 into Lots 15A and 16A, Block 4 of the Hillside Addition. Nineteen notices were mailed to property owners within 200' of the sitet two were returned in favor of the replat. staff Report: Mr. Yost stated that this tract is being rezoned from Single Family to Two Family. The replat conforms to Chapter 34 of the Code of Ordinances. Mr. Holt asked if the curb cut would be on Bernard and if the one on Fannin would be closed. Mr. Yost said the proposed curb out will be on Fannin. The existing curb cut on Bernard will be closed. Petitioner: John C. Johnson, 2905 Pensylvania Drive, stated that he is t-;e owner of the lots. The replat is just \ housekeeping. Nothing has been done with the lots since 1947. M i r ALL0010A A{~onda No. 'Q 2~ f Agonda Rem NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A DETAILED PLAN FOR 4.116 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF WINDSOR DRIVE AND LOCUST STREET (F.M. 2164), BEING A PART OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT r NO. 72; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 84-50, the City Council approved a planned development district (PD-72) for 127 acres of land located at the intersection of Windsor Drive and Locust Street (F.M. 2164), as more particularly described ther-in; and, WHEREAS, the Resolution Trust Corporation ha,~ applied for approval of a detailed plan for the district on 4.116 acres of land located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Windsor Drive and Locust Street (F.M, 2164) for the purpose of allowing for the construction of a Food Lion grocery store; and, 8, 1992, after a public hearing, the Planning and~Zoning Commission recommended approval of the detailed plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That Exhibit B, attached to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference, is approved as the Detailed Plan for the 4.116 acres of land shown in Exhibit A, also attached to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference, in accordance with Article IV of Chapter 35 of the code of Ordinances. The property shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the following conditions: 1. A permanent fence shall be constructed around the detention pond prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any building on the property and shall thereafter be maintained in good repair and condition. 2. A temporary fence shall be placed around the property during initial construction on the site. 3. No deliveries shall be made to the property by the use of a commercial vehicle whose gross body weight, as defined in Chapter 18 of the Code of Ordinances, is more than 12,000 pounds, between the hour_ of 7:00 a.m. and 9;n0 a.m. and between the hours of 2:30 p.m, and 4:00 p.m. SEC ION IT. That a copy of this ordinance shall be attached \ to Ordinance No. 84-50, showing the detailed plan herein approved for a portion of the district therein established. 5v. )E .I, k6nda No Q _ AUonda Item ~ i Lt~fa _l~ "Vt SECTION III. That any parson violating any provi i n ohs r ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $2,000.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. SECTIOU IV. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City secretary is hereby (irected to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the city of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the 4 date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: _ APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY 11Y. r -tf ig r r, r M ,H EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING a 4,116 acre tract of land In the BBB & CRR Co, Survey Abstract No. 186 situated in the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas and being Tract III of those certain tracts described in deed recorded in Vol, 2895, Pg. 677 of the Deed Records of Denton Coun , particularly described as follows; ty, Texas and being more BEGINNING at a 12" iron pin set near a wooden R,O,W, marker on the East right-of-way lino of , North Locust,4reet (I-W. 2164) (90' R,O,W.), said pin being on the North line of a tract conveyed to Eugene Blag,, by deed recorded in Vol, 3190 Pg, 358 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE N 00°17'31" E along said East right-of-way line, 410.98 feet to a 12" iron pin set in the South right-of-way line of Windsor Drive (80' R,O,W); THENCE S 89'40'30"E along said South right-of-way line 436.89 feet to a 1/Z" iron pin found in the West line of a tract conveyed to the Denton Independent School District by deed recorded in VoL 5350 Pg. 558 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE S 00°51'45" W along said West line, 413,76 feet to a 12" iron pin found in the North line of said Blagg tract; THENCE N 89°18'35" W along said North line, 432.78 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 179,309 square feet or 4,116 acres of land. Agmida No,a~~ fQZ Agenda Item_ Palo 17°; C Apenda No... Agenda kem_~I ~K EXHIBIT B Palo Detailed Plan for Retail Grocery Store: 1. Development Information (1 page), 2. Site Plan with Development Standards (1 page). 3. Landscape Plan (1 page). r. ti~ lgnada No, Agenda Item_.~- a,to'/n&^~ Development Information 2. Statement of Intent of Owner, To build and operate a retail grocery store. 2. Relationship to the Mater Plan, The plan complies with the Denton Development Plan. 3. Permitted Uses, The property may be used as a retail , grocery store. 4. Development Standards. As shown on the site and landscape plans. r ~v t 1 w, L .y ~ d DeaLU11 Independca 601001 DiA1" id OIIIC[ 01111[ A!!Il iAN1 SVI [RINiLNO[N~ /OA •ypN[\\ AI IAIII~ P O BOX 2]97 DENTON. TEXAS 76202 January 13, 1992 Agonda No. _ .2.1 Agenda item Mayor Robert Castleberry 4310 _/-P--[_~ Member of the City Council of Demon C/o City of Deulon, 215 fast McKinney Denton, Tx, 76201 Dear Mayor Castleberry; ,f The planning committee of Ilia Denton Independent School District met with Food Lion represcnlative Phillip Abell and his associate. The meeting was lield at the Denton 1SD Central services facility on Friday, January 10, 1992. Karen K, Feshari of the City of Deulon offered technical assistance to the school district, After a comprehensive review and analysis, it is recommended that the following conditions be placed on the zoning for the Food Lion properly; I, Fencing must be placed around (lie de(ention pond to detract nuv,van(cd visitors to this location, 2. 'temporary fencing must be placed around the construction site. 3, 't'here will be delivery allowed for Class 6, 7, and 8 vehicles between the hours of 7;00 A.M. to 9;00 A,M. and between the hours of 2;30 P.M. to 4;00 P.M. 't'hank you very much for your consideration, Sincerely, Gilbert Bernstein c; Dr, Tim Sonnenberg Mr, Lloyd Harrell Ms, Karen K. Feshari Ms, Barbara Fischer Ms. Barbara Colenian Planning Committee Members Board Members ~v J 1'J, 41 4T ]F T 7 T 7 7 14: T TTM -CITY ::-C~tJNCIL tffT4 _ - - TTITT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .1 o~o~QoadaQ aoao Px F o0 V o D 0 ~ ~a 4 o o v : ODV F a G0 ' OppOti•roV t~~,oU~v Op00CC(}uG~O~~ ~ ~ .k L it t r. 4'J rblq Y 4 f ~f I~ Agenda No. Agenda linm~_ ~ Q 0 Azj~~Jj"~ - DATE: 01/21/92 CITY COUNCIL REPORT RRMAT TOi Mayor and Memhera of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTI DOWNZONING 19.8 ACRES FROM PD 95 TO SF-16 RECOMMENDATIOO : The Planning and Zoning Commission recommender approval (6-0) at their meeting of December 11, 1991. SUMMARY : tf Downzone a 19.8 acre tract from Planned Development 95 to SF-lb. PD 95 was approved for a retirement community. BACKGROUND: See P&Z Report. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS _OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Neighborhoods and City Departments FISCAL IMPACT: N/A e ul y au om : Prepared by: Llo . Harrell City Manager Kagan K. F hart Ur n Planner 7 Appro ed: Fr nk H. ob ns, AICP Executive Director Planning and Development AXXOOOEI/5 C ~V <_r 1 r a ~ Is Nelda No. Agenda I1enr_ 5 T PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION R$lf®RT1.~~~._,~ Tot Mayor and Members of the City Council ~--f~- Case No.? Z-91-019 Meeting Dates 01/21/92 GENERAL INFORMATION Appiioantt Peter Kern, M.D. 2500 Hinkle Drive, #31.3 Denton, TX 76201 ~h Current Owners Same Requested Action: Downzone a 19,8 acre tract of land from Planned Development No. 95 to single family-16 (SF-16) residential. Location and Sizes A 19.8 acre tract located on the east side of Hinkle Drive between the Denton Center shopping facility and the Good Samaritan Village. Surrounding Land Use and zoning: North - PD-21; Good Samaritan Village South - General Retail; Denton Center East - General Retail and MF-1; North Texas Fair Association Nest - Single Family 10; Residential Denton Development Plant Low Intensity Area. SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportations Hinkle Drive is considered a collector street, has adequate right-of-way and is improved with curbs and gutter; therefore, no street improvements or right-of-way are warranted, As Hinkle is a collector, 75 feet of separation is required between driveways. J d r~}enda Nu, _ Agaiida (case 2-91-019) Uale Page TWO SPECIAL INFORMATIO2r (Continued) sidewalks will be required along the frontage of Hinkle. ' Drainage: The existing drainage pattern to the east should be maintained. A letter of map revision needs to be obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for the required fill prior y to preliminary plat approval. Utilities: Water: There is a 16 inch waterline on Hinkle. sewer: There is a 24 inch sanitary sewer with a 6 inch stub on Hinkle. Pro rata reimbursement of $21.00 per linear foot, to be paid to Texas Instruments will be required. Eleutric: Service is available from the west side of Hinkle or from a circuit along the southern property line. Fire: Fire flow is adequate. Parksi The Park Donation Policy is applicable. The Parks Department requests a donation of land for the development of a leisure park. When FEMA determines the actual 100-year flood zone, the Park staff would like to meet with the developer to determine boundaries and issues relating to this donation. This area should be delineated on the preliminary and final plats. Landsoapingi Prior to removal of any protected tree, a permit must be obtained. _J 14cY a<ry ~l 1 1'. qq iAgonda No, Agonda !ton.__-1 Li > (Case Z-91-019) W lo Page Three HISTORY This site was the subject of a zoning change request from SF-10 to PD classification in August of 1981. The developers proposed 240 ° multi-family units and 32 single family units on the 19.8 acre tract. The request was approved by the Planning and zoning Commission but was denied by the City council due to strong neighborhood opposition. On March 19, 1985, the city Council approved the rezoning of this tract from single family "SF-1n" to Planned Development "PD" classification and use for the purpose of a retirement campus. The site plan was approved for 67 units of single family attached housing on 9.5 acres, with a density of seven (7) units per acre; 183 multi-family units on 5.7 acres with a density of 32 units per acre; and a 60 bed health care facility on 1.3 acres. On December 11, 1991, the Planning and zoning commission recommended approval of Z-91-019 by a vote of 6-0. ANALYSIS This property is located in a low intensity area. According to the Denton Development Plan, low intensity areas are designated as the City's primary housing areas. The requested action of downzoning this tract from a retirement community to single family residential is not only encouraged but also,compli.es with the policies of the Denton Development Plan. RECOHHENDATIO*I Planning and zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-91-019 (6-0). ti I ..'II : ~YW10N~ J' ......'lrX('y1~ ~i Ij Menda No, ld ~ r Aponda ttem- Rite (Case 2-91-019) Page Tbree ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Ordinance 85-62. 3. Approved site plan for PD-95. ' 9. Draft Minutes of P&Z meeting of December 11, 1991. 5. ordinance AXX00081 t ti j f1 ATTACIUMENT 1 Z 91-019 Kern Property Downzoning Sits~~ onda Flo. ~ ~1jFonUa Ifoln.~ 1~~~ [klle 1-04k NORTH g NAPOENVItw~L-ALDWI i__~i~ ~eEPSy ! MEAOOrV E• -'-1 x aAPK _[R, Ap'`' GAGE , aLLMEA Or IJr A~~ ~ i J SITE MCA w I~ a NINDS09 r~ I JI_ MoaiNalrnE I t_ f J ~ IMSA ~ t _ eaxLtMC M CEEN r If~ i( m 1 w NE AOIEE L X11 ti ~ ~ --1 ORTN .ANE f YAM PAP4 ~.,e ~ IL1 1+lll. III ~ (',+J 1! I d ~ 1 ATA ORIVF,~,~ z Z w l r 1 FAIR r !II P£L++AVEN TALIA 1 1 ° 14CETON Cr, 1 ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ I AEEN9PAIR II ~ Pa55 \ J Y~ I ya I Tul ANEW iULAHE FAIA. OUNDS / / a !!I!Y z s~'Ea , 5 ~rl 4d A IV I AC \ ,llgrC ANhEPSi OR, w \ ----r~ rAt Y IIu1I! S I 5uN5Fr rY OR, NESTyS r7` rMEgr fAllll 4. _ _ rraN AAr tOR EKRI'PA0I0( cOLL n$ rrl ~ xESTt!ESr R ELEMENiMr 1 r~~ ~u tll 1 DATE: 11/26191 SCALE; NONE 1 e` C Yb 4 li 11 rU~s 10271. ATTAC11MENT 2 Nonda No. _ W2' Agenda Ilom_ 0 00 No. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 19.8454 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HINKLE DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET NORTH OF UNIVERSITY DRIVE (U.S. HIGHWAY 380), AND IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE-FAMILY "SF-10" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT w "PD" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: y rW SECTION I. That the zoning classification and use designation of toe following described property, to-wit: All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the R. Beaumont Survey, Abstract No. 31, City and County c£ Denton, Texas, being part of a (called) 42.07 acre tract described I.n a deed from Sidney Brandenberger to Crawford Building Corporation on June 13, 1955 and recorded in Volume 411, Page 491, Deed Records of said County, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a cross-tie fence corner post set in concrete at the northeast corner of said 42.07 acre tract; THENCE south 0°54' west along and near a fence on the east boundary line of said 42.07 acre tract 871.15 feet to a 2-Lnch steel fence post set in concrete; THENCE north 88°41'50" west 993.13 feet to a steel pin on the east boundary line of Hinkle Drive, THENCE north 1°18'10" east with the east boundary line of Hinkle Drive 874.10 feet to a steel pin on the north boundary line of said 42.07 acre tract; THENCE south 88°31'30" east along and near a fence on the north boundary line of said 42.07 acre tract 987.61 feet to the place of beginning and containing'in all 19.8454 acres of land. is hereby changed from Single-Family "SF-10" District Classi..Lca- tion end Use designation to Planned Development "PD" District Classification and Use designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION II. That prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the use of any building within the planned development district, the following conditions shall be met: 1. The property shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plan. 2. The single family attached structures shall be no more than one story in height. C 2. +r y Y bonds iJn. " ~1pGrrda Isom y 3. The trees along the western property llne siTall be retained as a screening device. SECTION III. That the development of the property shall be in substantial compliance with tine site plan attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, na an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances o: the City of Denton, Tuxas under Ordinance No. 69-1, be, and the Clnssi icacioneband~Useodsub~ectshto theh above change District and specifications. SECTION IV. ti That the C1Cy Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the 3eneral welfare of the City of tthings,forxthe cand with ofa the bdistrictidandtfor ~ its peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to =nerving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect hearingse havinge heits heldapproval, by the Planning land public oning Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after giving due notice thereof. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of March, 1985. CITY OF DENTUN, TEXAS r ATTEST: CIGFiAIR~LOTTFp717,~,7T7~~~~,nC.1AXY F DENTON) TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM; JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY. Z-1724/DAVID L. SPALDINC ',sE 2 {t 3. t ' w uuvrnm ON n Site Location A rdw ' p VC astt++~ 0 Site -Data r I 1. Aron 0 SIT. - 71,IM'a 0 = Ih5 Acroe lr-;J a 1 1 = Q C ~ 2, Current Zoning - Single Famlly - SIB-10 = rwKU+r.e C .r ~ 0 r i~ 5, On S1to Parking r 4PR Required Spaces 1/250 0. Building Area = 40 t M 0a `so a a o, Y. Deeign• Parking (Includoe 6 HG 5t411e) = ~8 r = Y1 u Q 4, vp-51to Not Avallable , "0.1$TOh n 5, Bullding 6rob5 Aroay - (Maximum) 35 AWAO ~&round Level ~ ~gp Building '1 - 5500 ef, Building 2 - 5000 of. 0 Mllding 5 -5500 ef, VICINITY MAP Total Sroee Area c 10,000 of. ~ i r 6. Helght of 5ulldingb - 501-0 MA H Gf: t 12Ioor to Aroa Ratio = ,14 Q ~,Q,.- f E Zoning SP-10 f KOnKok l~L~ 1y I 4 ~ I SS ~j • ~s- - g Son Scr Aj/ - F / ' ' 101I III to /CZIYAeA PIN i~ r I N I it iy-S.1.L Gam. G-~i CURE I I `I F his A tonin 5~-ID 9 IQ 1r'ARK/r~4 Slpt~N"1'lA1A U~~ h I /3 cAtis 1 - + I' P ,h 00500 41% / .T I IhC Ac:r~~ ;rod c7/Lb PLAN r I ti I. ' 7Y,PC[ X74 L- n 1- III LL li U~ L  L 0 7 _..le_ , . Fill by/rOnt _ ~ CC•• ~ - - - N• • Gtclrital ~o+R• 4intS/ r~_ ~ Y______~~ F. ~ Q ~ !On I Iwo ~ s~xna^.+x-~c,:res-s'~.u.an.r..'r ~1~__ • _ -~llrt _~'~1^ 6uU4 Lrain I InllL ! r la, wai.tr I;ng,07 ~ o N N I A ~B R A r 1 r i S6 .4." R.L. F. ~ 4io+m pro~r, LJr: ..j.':.1 Gllti~•~ 1 . P~pt ~+.cd (abk FeI~cE f~ a ds. LWS d r. '<'S . c~• cfrau~itsifn 29. NORTH 5 too c 1 of motion ~rom Survey by I4SS ' s c A L E 111 ~ 2a• o ~J1te InPo~^~nat rt Nosh, In<i. Penton, Texas. prints traciA1s 0~ S' l0' 20 30' 40 50 751 1:Jo' 1251 sheet ft ~ . .....ter.. d/tf / /I/ . • i ..r ..L 1...'.'L. n.,. .~W.~Vti IfN aM.:.~w.M .nN..1n.~M1\VJ il..i w//fir ' gi~wrYRWiMp/.1aY1 - - - _ - - wnY.ro~~r IrWf.N.l~r1Y~ w~ ..w~rd+wwww.+y~. ~~~•~r:.CwW~u~~a •JdViaAWi.M~n Jna Y.ri~i T.Wa~Jwaw~{LL~rM.CcYiY(Iit.r w....4.. r41. AJO"A. ~ - _ ~ w , r.1~/W►r Y4MMiWWMN'4~..~~•I~..r .y I.. +.J.~b. r1....~.rWw/M~M. r ~wr.nru+n~aw+.w'"'w pp~ 1 • t L0f RA Lor 6 LOr 7 ' B . BL oc ZONED /VF-1I GRAPHIC SCAL C SCAL E IN FEET EXISTING xle ' 0 5 10 20 30 40 50 w to 10 50 75 100 DRIVEWAY FIRE pp HYDRANT 10 15 20 SCALE IN METERS 6' SAN. SEDER ` FANS TM- Amma .i ISUN6 • . • . M . r► - 6' WATERLINE EIUSTM S• Ul •r PROPOSED 4` WIDE CONCRETE w"!M!!ALK ~r PP 67.00" EAGLE Lor 1 fi1MVIN BLOCK 4 z F~ iwpm O COL L INS O Z sss ,1 x it °w ~ .....Q1............ do f O Lor 2 p BLOCK 4 O L 1 Z e ,,1 6.  ~CUAh y 0 66.96t - 65.06 "EXIST 'NG co - cum i 3 0 r CUT I Q Q O v 0 S 89 59 04w W 134951 ti LOT 14 J LOT 3 BLOCK 4 I N BLOCK 4 Lcj sss ZONED 3F-7 I RECEIVED JAN 0 3 Im t F PLANNING i DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1JOR CHANGES IN TOPOGRAPHY FLOODPLAIN INFORMATION NOTE: NO MAJOR CH %ROPOSEDo NO PART OF THIS TRACT APPEARS TO BE WITHIN ARE PROPOSE LEGEND AN AREA DESIGNATED AS A FLOOD HAZARD AREA O J~/ ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE / , FIP - Found 1/2" Rebar PROGRAM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR THE JOHN C , JOHNSON MO,N - Monument ETROPLEX ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS CITY OF OENTON, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS ;NG. 't FRING PLANNING SUR VEYING ROW - Right-of-Way COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER 480194-000501 ENGr.{A16",,DATED AUGUS7,4, 1991 2 9 0 5 PENNSYLVANIA 601 SOUTH SIP - Set 1/2" Rebar ai cnirrw rAnom I Rntlt_EVAW SUITE 0 DENTON, TEXAS 76201 -X- - Fence Line THIS FLOOD STATEMENT DOES NOT IMPLY OR CERTIFY AND (817)363-, -E- - Electric Line SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO IDLY OA CERTIFY THAT THE p N T O N , TEXAS PREL l -T- - Telephone Line ~eRTY NWOR STRUCTUAIES SHow HEREON$ OR - - - l~ moommow, d STRUCTURES ERECTED AT ANY TIME AFTER THE DATE OF THIS MH - Manhole SURVEY, WILL IE FREE OF FLOODING OA n= OAMAV., PP - Power Pole GREATER FLOODS CAN OR MAY OCCUR AND FLOOD MEISHTS MAY SE INCREASED OR OECAEASEO BY MAW-MAK OR LI LP - Light Pole NATURAL =IS OF GOO) CAUSES BEING A FH - Fire Hydrant _-.r - Panzer Line BEING 0312 ACRE CI rY L O,L,- Building Line Me - Utility Easmt, 0aE,- Drainage Easmt. mw~ rCHECKEDi WN: _ C.E.- Communications Easmts APR L.IM.f+A PLAT FOR REVIEW ONLY HILLSIDE ADDITION LOTS 15A 9 16A, BLOCK 4 IEING A REPLAT OF LOTS 13 4 16, BLOCK 4 . omnse ?&I TUC r cat 1ruAt -rkt T ci lQVFV = Ap:4TAACT 996 _ y r 1. r 1 L6 1 I Iluaod Dordopeonl 1Sdf .-IS w.r»r..+w ww.- w IY p 1 `t ~~~I~i♦N'I Ni} I ~ .1-1- ♦ J/~ nam rrN.N C JI~t.C IA U Aftoe► _ 1 ~1 yjd~ltnldaaeoo do • • r _ 7? ecru T I I ~ .r l•°' ~YM►.11 ~ ~~I ~-~'J uuu ry Iw~l lwl A~r~YMTyM~Y. 1 ~~~~.yy»» y ~ ~\i(~ YINCI~ 1 1~ 1.~1•~11'.»l. ~ ~ ~ I,. r I M. Y.~rwa aNyl q.♦1 I .i1 \`-\j`y` yy.• V ~ ~ C..I , ; ' Iru I I ,I,o r a I S \ ' f600ls fa Nllr fealAp , \R~.1«~.nn yip C \ IcIMN L i •1CI_•__~ M 8 S1e01. hwIY 2onrny t_ \ L 7 ~r~til L IJ 0 O 1. I1M.ar.l ay. 111 I/ _ - ~f' - ~ \ ( lO,,nn W.rNI iINN 111w.I N14w 1 I t~ ti d 3+ ecru ~ ' told Lad Aw. 18.8454 ocul A 10•+IM.1.IIhN ,.w.bwNrlW w.`. IraNolly Ioaod Sing'* P.nllY (i.nf rd Ilolnl toalo0 DEVELOPMENT PLAN F147 .--------TL Aw 1.11 I PECAN tIJ `d RE T CAMPUS 3TAANES/B AD PAR1'NMMP .I'.wa r. DBN'!"ONI TEXAS 11y h d l kb'~I w 11 A 1 1.1 k., Sl Ie loo," .11 1-3 I ~ \ _ _ f 1 I ~J' ~YLI~LWNN MY . I VV I. lJl Ni AL ~M e I L.. ~ ~~I I kno tnu ~ !11.914 Family twl.a I r..n~ .r 4 bw \ . t - VICIMW MAP \ 8 singla Family H o o o-- -L 1 I _ ...YY. IY. AJ- lbm ulwtl M.IM w. yam. ljN.~J~ I r' r [-_.-~I~ 'Ib ou.....✓IU. Yi1.ef I- es_ f ~ J 4 t.x .ortluWriutt"Wix IYN~u w~•~..~Ij L l." 1 T.l.l-lA.d Au. 1010,494 ur.. FI.w1I11 .u..d 91.Pb Llnlly 6.au.1 A.HII toa mp DEVELOPMENT)I PLAN PECAN NYI I N 1 ..i(1L.r('j(.[py PARTNEA8WP DENTON. TEXAS r C. s IP s: is ii ATTACHMENT 4 P&Z Minutes Dec IJ fJ !ni December 11, 1991 Page 6 , l~entla o. A~ontlalllonj petition. f opposed: Mary Ann Murkey stated that she owns 906 Bell which is occupied by a yellow house. She is concerned about the entrance to the parking area. It is hard to get out of the driveway of the house onto Bell. Mr. Morgan said that the entrance will be on Withers about 1001 from the intersection of Bell. o Recommendation: Ms. Feshari stated that staff recommends approval. Chairman Holt closed the public hearing.+ Mr. Kamman stated that he does not see any problems with the proposal. Mr. Holt said that it will be nice to see the fruits of the landscaping ordinance on apartments. Mr. Kamman moved to recommend approval. Motion was seconded by Mr. Glasscock and carried unanimously (7-0). Mr. Holt left the meeting. IV. Hinkle Persona]. Care a. Hold a public hearing and consider rezoning a 19.8 acre tract of land from Planned Development 95 (PD-95) to SF- 16 on property located on the east side of Hinkle. 24 notices were mailed to propert., owners within 200 feet of the site; five were returned in favor and 0 in opposition. ' Mr. Robbins clarified that there are two separate zoning cases for this tract. The first is to rezone the entire PD to single family. The second case is for a SUP on four acres. Staff Report: Ms. Feshari presented the staff report (attached). Mr. Engelbrecht asked how many units per acre there would be with SF-16 zoning. 6. y Y. J ~L i P&Z Minutes December li, 1991 X15! Page 7 Apentla fJ*5~ 47 Mr, Robbins said that there would be 40 average density is 2.5 per acre. There is a considerable amount of flood plain on this tract that cannot be developed. Ms. Huey asked what a personal care facility is. 4 Ms. Feshari said that it is not specifically a nursing home. It is one step up. It is for people that need medical attention but do not need a nursing home. There will be nurses. Petitioner; John Zimmmerman, engineer, stated that part of the property is in the flood plain and they are working with FEMA. Mr. Engelbrecht asked if people will be c-ming and going from the facility or would it be just the staff and visitors, Mr. Zimmerman said that the clients are not bed-ridden. They are usually in the 80s and need some amount of supervision to get medication. It is a domicile with some of their own belongings. Perhaps they have no one at home to care for them. They have dining and recreational programs. At the personal care center he visited in another town, the people did not have vehicles. Staff consists of 35-50 people, Mr. Kamman asked if it would be like an apartment. Mr. Zimmerman said that he hasn't seen art exact floor plan but it will be one story. It is difficult for the elderly to negotiate two stories. There will not be individual. kitchens. The care center will be in the southwest corner of the tract fronting Hinkle. The City has adequate screening berms to reduce the visibility from the street. There will also be livinq screens. Ms. Huey asked the plans for the other 15 acres. Mr. Zimmerman said that it will be left as it is until such time as they may need to expand the facility. That would require an SUP amendment but there are no plans for developing the remaining acreage at this time. There may be a foot path along the creek. c4 Si. DP&Z ecMinutes w AFT December 11, 1991 AOondaPlo. Page 8 Apanda lona In Favor: Truitt Lea e, 1210 Greenbriar, stated that this is the first positive step for the property that has been proposed. Good Samaritan Village is a good neighbor and an asset to the neighborhood. There is a drainage problem in the creek area. That area should be made into a park. It cannot be used and has no real access. Residents of good Samaritan use the property to go to the shopping center. He lives three houses off of Hinkle and the drainage is so bad that it backs up to his house. If the property owner does any drainage improvements, that would help. It should be considered that a lot of people use the sidewalk and bike path. George Spuller, 1205 Greenbriar, stated that he is in favor and recommends that the front of the building face Hinkle. He has lived in his home for 23 years and there have been some improvements to the drainage but it is still a concern. He is pleased with the development and is glad to find out what a personal care center is. He would like to know the density. Mr. Engelbrecht answered that according to the plan it is a 60 room, 120 bed facility. The rest of the property would be governed by how much of the property is usable. opposed: No one was present to speak in opposition. Recommendation: Ms. Feshari said that staff recommends approval of the rezoning from PD-95 to SF-16. Vice-chairman Kamman closed the public hearing. it was moved by Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht, and unanimously carried (6-0) to recommend approval of Z-91-019, b. Hold a public hearing and consider a specific Use Permit or, a 4.59 acre tract of land for the purpose of a personal care center on property located on the east side of Hinkle, north of Denton Center. 24 notices were mailed to property owners within 2001) 4 were returned in favor and o in opposition. Staff Report: Ms. Feshari presented the staff report (attached). B, ; f' e:\wpdocs\z91019.ord Ir ATTACHMENT 5 Ardonda PJO. ~ Agonda flam__ P_ ORDINANCE NO. W16 4 ~ tGE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A'IN ZONING FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 95 (PD-95) TO ONE-FAMILY DWELLING (SF-16) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 19.6 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HINKLE DRIVE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Peter Kern has applied for a change in zoning for 19.8 acres of land from Planned Development No. 95 (PD-95) to One- Family Dwelling (SF-16) zoning district classification and use designation) and WHEREAS, on December 11, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commis- sion recommended approval of the requested change in zoning; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the change in zoning will be in compliance with the Denton Development Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the zoning district classification and use designation of the 19.8 acres of land described in Exhibit A, attached to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference, is changed from Planned Development No. 95 (PD-95) to One-Family Dwelling (SF-16) zoning district classification and use designation under the c010prehensive zoning ordinance of the city of Denton, Texas. SECTION II. Viat the City's official zoning map is amended to show the change in zoning district classification. SECTION 111, That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $2,000.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective four- teen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause tha caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official news- paper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR C 9. w. ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERSe CITY SECRETARY Agenda No, WAgOnda Ren) SY : fife APPROVER AS TO LEGAL FORM: • DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY ~t t t~t.v ~~_J Q' J\ 'rah' BY. A PAGE 2 C~ 10, a ;V 'd EXHIBIT "A" P~onda No. Agenda Ilem._.. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Date.__I--,_L- '/6 /G WHEREAS, PETER KERN is the owner of a certain parcel or t D of land situated in the R. Beaumont Survey, Abstract Number 31, Denton, Denton County, Texas, and being a part of that tract conveyed to Crawford Building Corporation from Sidney Brandenberger in a deed dated June 13, 1955, and recorded in Volume 411, Page 491 of the Denton County Deed of Records and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a found 1" square iron rod found in an old R.R. cross-tie concrete footing at the nortboast corner of a 42.07 + acre tract as described in said deed from Sidney Brandenberger, et ux, to Crawford Building Corporation; THENCE S 00°52'59" W, along and near a fence on tits western property line of Infinity Strata Addition and the western boundary line of Denton County Fair Association, a distance of 871.18 feet to a found 2" steel post, said post being on the northern boundary line of Denton Center Phase II; THENCE N 88045'53" W. along and near a fence on the northern boundary line of said Denton Center Phase II, a distance of 993.89 feet to a found 1/2" iron rod, said iron rod being op the eastern right-of-way (60' wide) of Hinkle Drive; THENCE N 01°18'10" E, along and near a fence on the eastern right-of-way of said Hinkle Drive, a distance of 875.35 feet to a found 1/2" iron rod; THENCE S 88031'18" S, along and near a fence on the southern boundary line of Good Samaritan church, a distance of 987.51 feet to the Point of Beginning and Containing 865,122 square feet or 19.860 acres of ?sand, more or less. 01► ' e JOHN ZI NffR A 24-go d iUnq PAGE 3 11. r t _ THIN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CITY: COUNCIL 41 Tw: - - 9 ~r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ooOQOo F DV ~oo - _ OO~ { ~ N o00~ ' - _ b0 `ti o pP A c d d Q` N r o v t p0a~ to fi t tr y t. r i t. y 4~ y s 7L:~- DATE: 01/21/92 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT To: Mayor and Members of the city Council Agenda No. #A- : Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager Agenda / porn ~ 4tle dqA FROM SUBJECT: SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A PERSONAL HEALTH CARE FACILITY 2 RECOMMENDATION: (//J 4 The Planning and zoning Commi anion recommended approval of the specific use permit and site plan (6-0) at their meeting of December 11, 1991. SUMMARY: Request approval of a specific use permit on a 4.82 acre tract of land located on the east side of Hinkle, directly behind Denton center shopping Center. DACKO$OUND: See P&Z Report. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Recipients of health care, City Departments, Neighborhood FISCAL IMPACT: N/A ci:l l 4Bal Prepared by: d i'. Hal - City Mk.nager Ka en K. F Shari Ur an Planner a App ved3 l F nk H. Ro bins, AICP Executive Director Planning and DevelC%ment AXX000H1/4 4 4 f. m Agenda No. ? d Agenda Item /QS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REP3O To: Denton Planning and Zoning Commission Cage No.: Z-91-020 Meeting Date: 01/21/92 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicants Peter Kern, M.D. 2500 Hinkle Drive Denton, TX 76202 current owner: Same Requested Aotion: Specific Use Permit on a 4.82 acre tract of land for the purpone of a Personal Health Care facility. Looation and Size: 4.82 acres located on the east side of Hinkle, directly behind Denton Center. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant (rezoning request for SF-16) South - "GR" General Retail; Denton Center East - "PD 25" (rezoning request for SF-16); vacant West - "SF-10" Residential Denton Development Plan: Low Intensity Area SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: Hinkle Drive is considered a collector street, has adequate right-of-way and is improved with curb and gutter; therefore, no street improvements or right-of-way dedication are warranted. c. i P'r:';, rrg1. f 4 Agenda No, (Case 2-91-020) Page TWO Apon7n; F ~gIL l SPECIAL INFORMATION - (Continued) Transportation: As Hinkle is a collector, 75 feet of separation is required between driveways. 4 sidewalks exist along the frontage of Hinkle. Drainage: Tho existing drainage pattern to the east should be maintained. A letter of map revision needs to be obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for the required fill prior to preliminary plat approval. utilities$ Water: There is a 16 inch waterline on Hinkle. Sewert There is a 24 inch sanitary sewer with a 6 inch stub on Hinkle. Pro rata reimbursement of $21.00 per linear foot paid to Texas Instruments, will be required. Electric: Service is available from the west side of Hinkle or from a circuit along the southern property line. Fire: Firs flow is adequate. all e Si Mond.2No, _g -oar 4 Agenda 11ei'n_ (Case Z-91-020) Unto_~~ Page Three 4i SPLCIAL INFORMATION - (CoAtinued) Parks: The Park Donation Policy is applicable. The Parks Department requests a donation of land for the development of a leisure park. when FEMA determines the actual 100-year flood zone, the Park staff would like to meet with the developer to determine boundaries and issues relating to this donation. This area should be delineated on the preliminary and final plats. HISTORY This site was the subject of a zoning change request from SF-10 to PD classification in August of 1981. The developers proposed 240 multi-family units and 32 singly family units on the 19.8 acre tract. The request was approved by the Planning and Zoning commission but was denied by the City Council due to strong neighborhood opposition. on March 19, 1985, the City Council approved the rezoning of this tract from single family "SF-10" to Planned Development "PD" classification and use for the purpose of a retirement campus. Tho site plan was approved for 67 units of single family attached housing on 9.5 acres, with a density of seven (7) units per acre; 183 multi-family units on 5.7 acres with a density of 32 units per acre; and a 60 bed health care facility on 1.3 acres. On December 11, 1991, the Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval of Z-91-020 (6-0). I it Awda No. _UFO, Aganda aom_ (Cage Z-91-020) Page Four Date _ L~1 ANALYSIS The site is in a low intensity area. According to the Denton Development Plan, these locations are primarily for residential uses. The Plan does however, allow for diversified uses. The following policies are analyzed. 1. Strict site plan control within 1600 feet of residential gP" dwellings. The applicant has submitted a site plan as well as an architectural elevation. in addition, there is a landscaping plan which exceeds the minimum requirements. Berms will be utilized along the frontage of Hinkle in order to add to aesthetics and to buffer from the residences across Hinkle. 2. Traffic design to ensure that multifamily and non- residential uses have access to collectors or larger arterials. Hinkle is considered a collector, all access will be from Hinkle. 3. The overall density/intensity standard is not violated. currently, the entire tract of land, 19.8 acres has an allocation of 1683 intensity trips. 4.5 acres of land for institutional use is allocated 382.5 trips. Although 60 trips per acre is the allowed intensity of this site, because trips had been approved via PD-95, this policy is not violated. 4. Sufficient green space, recreational facilities and diversity of parks are provided. As stated in the "SPECIAL INFORMATION" section of this report, the Parks Department is requesting a donation of land for d leisure park on the property adjacent to this site. In addition, the applicant is exceeding the landscaping requirements by 35%. 4 l 1i ' IS . ,j Agenda No, (Case 2-91-020) AUonda Iloin Page Five Uuto._~ ,I~1' _ lo~ iZo2 ANALYSIS - Continued 5. Input into planning by neighborhood associations, To staff's knowledge, the applicant has not conducted any n neighborhood meetings; however, there has been an article in the Denton Record Chronicle pertaining to the proposed land use. In addition to the policies of the Denton Development Plan, the zoning ordinance states that a Specific Use Permit shall be issued only if all of the following conditions have been found; 1. Conditions That the specific use will be compatible with and not injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property, nor significantly diminish or impair property value within the immediate vicinity, Comments The applicant, as part of the application has submitted an architectural elevation which depicts the design of the building, since berms will be utilized along the frontage of Hinkle, the residences across the street should not be able to see the entire building. In addition to the berms, the applicant has chosen to exceed the landscaping requirements. The normal floor--to-area (FAR) ratio for a single family dwelling is approximately .28; the proposed health care facility's FAR is .23, Because of the design of the building, internal and external traffic circulation as well as the landscaping, it does not appear as though the surrounding property values will be significantly diminished or impaired. 2. Conditions That the establishment of the specific use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding vacant properties. Comments The only vacant property near this site is to the north and east. All of the 19.8 acres is under common ownership at this time and is planned, at some point for single family residential use. All other properties are improved. Y. ki f 'i w Agonda No. W Aponda Ilom_ 01..~ (Case Z-91-020);lo Page Six oCiCJ ANALYSTS - Continued 3. Conditions That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and other necessary supporting facilities have been or will be provided. Comments When the applicant goes through the platting process, all of the drainage improvements as well as surrounding infrastructure must be addressed. 4. Conditions The design, location, and arrangement of all driveways and parking spaces provides for the safe and eonviinient movement of vehicular and pedestrian traffic without adversely affecting the general public or adjacent developments. Comments The Engineering department has worked with the applicant in the design and location of the driveways and parking spaces and has found this condition generally acceptable. 5. Conditions That adequate nuisance prevention measures have been or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise, and vibration. Comments The design of the site is such that there should be little noise created by this type of development. 6. Conditions That directional lighting be Orovided so as not to disturb or adversely affect neighboring properties. Comments The landscaping plan shows eight (8) lighting fixtures mounted on the building shining down. The maximum height of the fixtures will be 12 feet, 7, Conditions That there are sufficient landscaping and screening to ensure harmony and compatibility with adjacent properties. Comments This condition is met. i c.. r. I y :i l 9 Agenda No, Agenda- i -F- (Case Z-91-020) Page Seven /LW . 8, ANALYSIS - Continued In accordance with Section 35, Article III, Division 4: "In authorizing a specific use permit, the Planning and Zoning commission may recommend and the City Council may impose additional reasonable conditions necessary to protect the public interest and welfare of the community including a time period for which a specific use permit is valid." e r~ RECOMMENDATION Planning and zoning commission recommends approval of Z-91-020 (6-0). ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition 2. Approve petition with additional conditions 3. Deny petition 4. Postpone consideration ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan 3, Landscape Plan 4, Architectural Elevation 5. Ordinance 85-62 6, outline from applicant what a personal care facility is. 7. Minutes c£ P&Z meeting of. i)ecember 11, 1991, S. Ordinance AXX00080 1 x J ,t i i ATTACHMENT 1 Z 91-o20 Personal Care Center (Kern) Agond3No. r~02 #jf=NORTH i ~'_j ` oanJ ( ~ MEAOOVYtE'a~ If Ip GABE CY iii W <„J ALCM s}fE1 _ S= c in. -6px MCA z WINDSOR SITE , - 1 J f NGRTNAI CE_ JL-_ - / C oar MIMOSA GREEN z W I ~y HEAGIEE Z j IlMCq l4~ 1 ¢ W VAN ~LT - PARK-E M ¢ < RATA ORIYE m OA AflK (WJ / I r ~ FA[N H AU -Bll-RN tA4IA t BELHAVEN \ INCETON CT,__ L FATRGRGUT•DS !l w GREENRRAIR i ROSS TULANF.~~ e: J 2i Tul_ ANE/ U IL ~SF!ER O MAyR \ L~ \ Z laJ IV AC L \ 1 ~I J GR. Ll Lu AMHERSt tge -I I~ TAL T S9NSET AL Y ``II" _x.11 u C01.L ~R-,Y E.ST I I EMFq Y-_~ ~ ~A~A~~ eMEflY TAN R, y 100 N" TARY RY i vESTCMESTER L Lull I ~ PATE; 11/26191 SCALE: NONE C 4 I• 27 .z f h Il i Agenda No. _SCI' i nrd i 1 onus _ _ 7,17 1 Coto I f I !Ill:hllllfI IT trlII1,I-I -111 ; IE C\'\\ f t; iii 1 Ili Ole s - I ly. ~ ~Y1 ,1 ( I li r I !l~ld~~etc~f6e ~ ~ ~I f?~~ Il'I ! I !y r~y~,ns• o~ ~ l~~ ~ r 4 an d be c; ~ a f 'V, li. Z I P { ~ ~ ~ ,u 1 ~\p ~~pp~f)~ Q I p ~7 i t 11f~ l ~ N ~Y ~ Jill if A K Ru Fi'314~ _3~aST4+• rto 1 r\ \ ` ; n 1 \ ~I se.o io~t - a k f{ ! ! o a m , I 1 r ' SO~! CA;~~~ CcNTcRl KERN PER AI , -_♦f•' -/1 1 ( 9 OBNTON, iE%A9 r , LANE 1 I 1 1 - 1 r 1 s 1 1 1 ~ calla 1 < a ors 1 i / lon a nwu . . 1 ~ St if ~u n ~i~ln{~Ln+ ".w FF 11 "PERSONAL 3, PNM1 CARE LENIER y 11 0 ~ nanf Kaftl Mx1Y [qAT MIN rlr i1a) i { [SI' A.t+ 1♦i~Ya al MM1V ".11 carat +v A It • lE It A{iellda Item-, Ir 1 - / 1 p \ ` Ij ~ ~-f, i C"J i l'`T3J II • . r f~ '~,5#--t _L.._. i. ~ of e y r L a r~ Ill \ \ ~ ~ _ _ _ i J I t t III r \ ➢ r !i c - i i OIL CI: \ . \ l'.rw n. t T~ ~ f' ` I • \ t' '1 I J, ♦I~ -V h -f 7~ I / ~i~ .,}}}III 1 .r' ~ R\ (Tp IX '10 yn, sroi.a~'.t 2d -np..ay,s._a,o.. N~a_gvah»i..Q.L.s.4a.,a.,.. rein ~%.a+n-.: -•t j { E t I I~ , its ~ 1}6 :g { ~ ~ A - g ~i { il!'y31 y i j 11 r I i f I n1 7' ~l 'r'-i 11 .'j s 1 4' t Er c f } a}~ E7 i 1 t! 1 1 it tik.r G ° k^j ! ! c ii i r {1 ! 1 i !I '!i'~Esflil~l !Ir li, ~I`` ~I lilll;`k I 4 f i ? i z ~ t~ 1 ~ tj~ ~ II Hilt' ij ~13i ~I !I i !E I ! 6i tl+ r~ip'I` C Ili It s e s r e j is i I~; 3 d'l1lj ! Jib r{ 1 I?! ! !IE' E' e t 1'I !E !I~ a. t 7 ti✓ r{ i yd///wr41+~'i'l?MM4M'~C'~Y~is!WbkMA1MA,-'~F,lyrclas yaNS(f.Ni.~.kK~y,~I.Y[t}r~t ~yai?KM1K~`~•Y7-•.,w •~t~. '/Iq~p_ , 1 ~ It 1 V 1 l 1 O ` { ' \ CA~ , ~ rl--_ - w~ _ Il n) \ \ ♦~r«1 r41 III ,IM WII YII', -~'////,Z 111 A n~ i r A ras ....r V r/rv Il iww ww we ru 1. ll` Y 1 1 r ~ / 141 G) 6 i _(T n;i' l: J , ~r~ fl-O LI11 MI• Y.r M II 1 t; pp~~ A 1 ~r. ~ ~ ry ~ ~ rtoa YrW er Wn ii ~ U> I 111.., " ~ ~ / \ [ f0i. rE; >1 I - w u I 1111' I,. ~ (/"~,~Y . 4 w•.. nw w• ~i Lrr valr li"• 1 u ♦i nl - 1r' / !CW «IW MM MI M11'll / L n ~ 1 i } I•I rN f r W 1 111 r ` 1 A \ (I ~.n.~ ~ ~ f 1w.M a I 1 a w ~ u~ r0~ ti t`r 7 ~ , rt 1 • mlr li ' 111 J 1. ~1 l~Gl~qr_~ 1~ ~Ir ,l 1 .ra~.~r rlwl i~• rrl~~u -1_~\ i [ i _ i ' ~ r. r.E He!rr .rrr:r flrR j'~ _~~..I~ ) ~ JvnrrS ~ .r, .s 1.ur / R' • CCC `1 '1 ' ^~J • \ ' M { y 1 I\MrYWR...=b•\II Ry.tlr 11l I ' \ . e ~ , '!irW a"w iawr. rr'x 1 " V 71 Y..n,r alma. t.:a ~ \ll wa. • nm'woa I f_ll~ ( ~ ~ YrM e, 1414r••„rrroa %o 1 .M 1 1 .w w n le.I 11 V I. 1Y1 M•111 w IIi I11 N. 11. -l'.V• ~`fi 1 "rr r... 1\ \ i 'i 1 , / r V C~ IlrlH `0'111111 t1,frryl 11 lIp ~.IN M. 11. t 4,. OD S t SI KERN r E ONfON OENf ON COUNTY. TEXAS eowrl[ A [w a~irutlRwAVW MIAS 1RrrRCIRM01lfA 11 A.V" 1 i.:1o~~~~la Y\~~`. j~ ,r~ _ n11~IHirt(III$V~ (N / u / K ` 1 n L~4R'~G/~P6 PLLN f Y 1 l,.'df.A 1F1F ' • O~dlh7lli V ...r~._l,:'. Uu_"L!!y.__..._ y.~a r rt (I i v. k-. (y ni ci 4 Q y FFSONf" F- LE\,/ATIc!;, C+ n g' ao' fie' o.' usamirm Km ruan n, ERN PERSONAL CARE CENTE AKHTEOTIE"d"EERIM-AINMI DENTON, TEXAS AIA, RE, l - = DR. PETER E, KERN - OWNER 121ODDONIAL W"ARLIWTai,TVMM3AC$i»,V$7 4 C u ri I~z~L rl.,~Z ATTACHMENT 5 Agonda Nn.UPI_4 A gonda lion? No, HE ZONING HAP AS SAMENWASEADOPTEDUASTAN APPENDIX TO OF THE CODE I F ORDINANCCES OFYSHE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINeLK E NO, 69-1 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 19,8454 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HINKLE DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET NORTH OF UNIVERSITY DRIVE (U,S. HIGHWAY 380), AND 15 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CI4d31FICATION FROM SINGLE-FAMILY "SF-l0" D USE "PDTRDISTRICTSCLASSIFIICA IYON AND DESIGNATION TO DESIGNATION; AND PROVIDING DEVELOPMENT FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS; SECTION I, That the zoning classification and use designation of the following described property, to-wit; All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in '.,he R. Beaumont Survey, Abstract No, 31. City and County of Denton, Texas, being part of a (called) 42.07 acre tract described in a deed from Sidney BrandenbArger to Crawford Building Corporation on June 13, 1955 and recorded in Volume 411, Page 491, Deed Records of said County, and being more particularly described as follows.' BEGINNING at a cross-tie fence corner post set in concrete at the northeast corner of said 42,07 acre tract; THENCE south 0°54' west along and near a fence on the east boundary line of said 42.07 acre tract 871.15 feet to a, 2-inch steel fence post set in concrete; THENCE north 88°41'50" west 993,73 feet to a steel pin on the oast boundary line of Hinkle Drive; THENCE north 1°18'10" east with the *eat boundary line of Hinkle , Drive 874-LO feet to a steel pin on the north boundary line of said 42.07 acre tract; boundaryoline o88 fo3slaid"42 east 987.61afeet fence to on the place rof beginning and containing'in all 19.3454 acres of land. Is hereby changed from Single-Family "SF-10" District Classifica- tion and Use designation to Planned Development "PD" District Classification and Use designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas, SECTION II, That prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the use of any building within the plgnnad development district, the following conditions shall be met; L. the property shall be developed in accordance wits the approved site plan. 2. The single family attached structures shall be no more than one story in height. ;t l~genda Mo. ~.e~~----- A96nda 110W property ffe shal be 3 retained as along a screening e device, r SECTION III. That the developmect of the property shell be in substantial compliance with the site plan attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appeneix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under Ovainance No. 69-1, be, and the same is hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and Use subject to the above conditions and ! specifications. SECTION IV. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensf.ve plan for the purpose of prom orl.ug the general welfare of the City of t~ Denton, for Texas, the character of the bdistrictidandt for its peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view lives toandconserving encouraging value of the buildings, protecting human citizen$ the maximum benefit to the and its land fr the mtDenappropriate tonP Texas, uses of City of SECTION V. That this ordinance shall be In full force and effect hearings havingeheretofore sabeen a hold by approval, Planning sand toning Commission and the City Council of the City of Danton, Texas, after giving duo notice thereof. PASSED AND APPROVED this the l day of March, 1985. '6 '9TE KRT-- MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: M~90 L Of DENTON, CITY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Dui BY:401L 1 :-1724/DAVID L. SPALDING/PAGE 2 C c~ r 3 c ATTACHMENT 6 Agonda No. Agonda llon~ W16 f~~o2 DOROTHY V. KERN PERSONAL CARE FACHM 2350 HROM E DIRITON, TEXAS 7U un wnew pmrao W care uWt will offer a needed level of healthcare for the 11w unit will provide care on a persona, basis that is more complete than resldentW care, but less than nursing home care. If you or a member of your family needs that little "extra step" of care like assistance with bathing or showering, personal daily hygiene, supervision of their medications and treatments and the providing of their daily meals. The Dorothy V. Dorothy Pavillion also offers housekeeping, laundry service, recreational activities, and a general homelike atmosphere. And All of this is provided at a substantially lower cast and is provided to give you peace of mind for residents,that need some supervision, but do not need nursing home care. Remember, this personal care unit will have a high degree of medical supervision by llcertued nurses instead of ail nursing aides. Look into this new and unique service for your family members. We will be able to take wheel chair bound patients, rJ . c. 1 l A P&Z Minui:,?s AEjonda No. _ December 11; 1991 AQan IRII ua Rani,-~ 55 T Page 8 A In Favor: Truitt Leake, 1210 Greenbriar, stated that this is the first positive step for the property that has been proposed. Good Samaritan Village is a good neighbor , and an asset to the neighborhood. There is a drainage problem in the creek area. That area should be made into a park. It cannot be used and has no real access. Residents of good samaritan use the property to go to the shopping center. He lives three houses off of Hinkle and the drainage is so bad that it backs up to his house. If the property owner does any drainage improvements, that would help. It should be corsidered that a lot of people use the sidewalk and bike path. George Spuller, 1205 Greenbriar, stated that he is in favor and recommends that the front of the building face Hinkle. He has lived in his home for 23 years and there have been some improvements to the drainage but it is still a concern. He is pleased with the development and is glad to find out what a personal care center is. He wou?,d like to know the density. Mr. Engelbrecht answered that according to the plan it is a 60 room, 120 bed facility. The rest of the property would be governed by how much of the property is usable. Opposed: No one was present to speak in opposition. Recommendation: Ms, Feshari said that staff recommends approval of the rezoning from PD-95 to SF-16. " Vice-chairman Kamman closed the public hearing. It was moved by Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht, and unanimously carried (6-0) to recommend approval of Z-91-019. b. Hold a public hearing and consider a Specific Use Permit on a 4,82 acre tract of land for the purpose of a personal care center on property located on the east side of Hinkle, north of Denton Center. 24 notices were mailed to property owners within 2001; 4 were returned in favor and 0 in opposition. Staff Report: Ms. Feshari presented the staff report (attached), t y I ie~„s5'f1 f~ ,;t1 i P&Z ecemberMinut1e1s, 1991 A Agondaonda Na. F A D Declto~n Page 9 fhto 1409-12' Mr. Appleton asked what a leisure park is. Ms. Feshari explained that it is a more passive recreation area for jogging, benches, etc. Staff is waiting to see what FEMA designates as the flood plain. The floodway and possibly part of the flood plain could be made into park area. The front of the care center " will be 103 feet from Hinkle. Mr. Appleton asked if the property owners agreed to donate land for a park, if there would be public access. ~ Ms. Feshari said yes. Mr. Engelbrecht said that he does not have a problem with this proposal but he is concerned about Denton Center's ability to survive. As it declines it will look seedier and seedier. It is being ringed with facilities that will not use it. Normally a moderate activity center would have apartments to support the center. Tho health care industry is booming right now. These facilities are being concentrated. If the industry declines, then the whole area will have a problem. Mr. Kamman said that he doubts the property would be developed single-family and the neighbors would not want apartments. Petitioner: Mr. Zimmerman stated that the drainage problem is compounded by an inadequate facility that overflows down through the shopping enter. It may have less than a five year capacity in the channel. A concrete lined channel on the petitioner's property would make the situation worse further down. It would be better to widen and provide some detention. That will be addressed along with the availability of land for a park. He can understand the concern that the facilities will decline. The mean age is advancing and this facility will be needed for a number of years to come. The elderly populatiLn needs this types of facility to contribute to their comfort. It has a real place in society. It is not a bad site for, this use. They are still doing an analysis of the drainage and working with engineers. The bad thing about the channel improvement is that they would lose a lot of trees. Mr. Appleton asked if the owner has discussed the park r. 3 II P&Z Minutes December 11, 1991 Page 10 Agonda No Agonda Item alto donation policy. ~B. Mr. Zimmerman said that no decision has been reached. In Favor: Mr. Leake said that as a homeowner he cannot ask for a better situation. This is an excellent idea. It won't disturb the neighborhood. Opposed: No one was present to speak in opposition. Recommendation: Ms. Feshari stated that staff recommends oe approval contingent on council approving Z-91-019, vice-chairman Kamman closed the public hearing. Mr. Appleton asked if trees can be saved when channelization is done. Mr, Salmon said that channelization will not be required. The water needs to drain naturally. The floodway is 100- 200 feet wide. It can't be touched. The floodplain can be built in so there is a considerable amount of developable property on this tract. Ms. Huey asked if the sign will meet the ordinance. Ms. Feshari said yes. It is 6' high and has 60 square feet of effective area. Mr. Appleton moved to recommend approval with the condition that at least the floodway be, donated for a park. Ms. Huey seconded. ' Mr. Morris stated that the policy adopted by the Council mandates that there be no requirement to donate parkland in conjunction with zoning, The Glouncil has already decided that the City will not require donations. Mr. Appleton withdrew his condition and Ms. Huey agreed. Motion to recommend approval was carried unanimously (6- 0) . Mr, Engelbrecht asked if there is a language in which the commission could make a recommendation to the council about a donation, %C. a P&Z Minutes R 7-z D ecember 11, 1991 Page 11 IblO. Mr. Zimmerman said that this is a problem area so the owner may be happy to donate it, Mr. Leake said that there 'A already a drainage problem under the shopping center so the property is no good for anything else, AXXOOOBO :000 a 5~ r ALLOOOE4 ATTACHMENT 8 rgonda No.. p2 Apond~3 ltom_ Date NO. J~A02-11 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A PERSONAL HEALTH CARE FACILITY, ON 4.52 ACRES OF ]J~ND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HINKLE DRIVE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 4 WHEREAS, Peter Kern has applied for a specific use permit for a personal health care facility; and WHEREAS, on December 11, 1991, the Planning and zoning Commission recommended approval of the permit; WHEREAS, in accordance with Artic?,e 10 of the Appendix B- zoning of the Code of ordinances, the City Council finds that all the following conditions exist: 1. That the use will be compatible with and not injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property, nor sign?- fic:antly diminish or impair property values within the immediate vicinity; 2. That the establishment of the use will not impede the orderly development or improvement of surrounding vacant property; 3. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other necessary supporting facilities have been or will be provided; 4. That the design, location, and arrangement of all drive- ways and parking spaces provide for the safe and con- venient movement of vehicular and pedestrian traffic without adversely affecting the general public or adjacent developments; 5. That adequate nuisance prevention measures have been or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise and vibration, if any; 6. That directional lighting, if any, will be provided so as not to disturb or adversely affect neighboring pro- perties; and 7. That there is sufficient landscaping and screening to ensure harmony and compatibility with adjacent pro- perties. i Agooda Vo.. ` A()onda flom. NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY AIMS f SECTION I. That a specific use permit for a personal health care facility is granted for the 4.82 acres of land in Exhibit A, attached to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference. SECTION II. That the property shall be developed, used, and maintained in accordance with the site plan shorn in Exhibit B, attached to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference. ° SECTION III. That the City's official zoning trap is amendea to show the change in zoning district classification. SECTION IV. That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a suns not exceeding $2000.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. SSZCTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the city of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ^ A ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. D.RAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY au BYs r i PAGE 2 r. FPNAS 4. EXHIBIT A Apm~tla No. Agor tla Ilom_ ~1 tl~lor_._- az ,2,2 BEING a 4.82 acre parcel or tract of land out of the R/+ Beaumont Survey, Abstract Number 31, Denton, Denton Countyy~, yy Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a found 1/2" iron rod, said iron rod being in the Easterly Right-of-Way of Hinkle Drive at the e Southwesterly corner of a 19.8454 acre tract as described and recorded in Volume 3022, Page 34 Deed Records Denton County, Texas; THENCE N 01018'10" E. along the Easterly Right-of-Way of said Hinkle Drive a distance of 455.00 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod for a corner; THENCE S 88045'53" E, a distance of 462.00 feet to a set 1/2" Iron rod for a corner; THENCE S 01018'10" W, a distance of 455.00 feet to a.set 1/2" iron rod for a corner; said iron rod being in the Southerly line of said 19.8454 acre tract; THENCE N 88°45'53" W, along the Southerly line of said 19.8454 acre tract, a distance of 462.00 feet to the Point of Beginning and Containing 210,209 square feet or 4.82 acres of land more or less. VjHN ZIMMERMANb i P rr~7//r C~ PAGE 3 s ~i . i~ T T -CITY COUNCIL - - - - - - - oOQ0QQ17~Q~OQ~~oO L OO~O a ro OpGP . o P p a d o v o n i O~O~ f o y S E+ f7/7n f-(0) " } t ~Yr.tt 1~~r 1. } k11 ; lifl, i s ~ U DATES 01/21/92 QITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAL Agenda Mo. _ Agonda Item_ T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council i131~ - FROMt Lloyd V. Harrell, city Manager SUBJECTS Z-91-018 Rezoning .7675 acre from PD-40 and 6F-7 to Multi-Family 1 (MV-1). RECOMMENDTIOt3t The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval (7-0) at their meeting of Dsceniber 11, 1991. SUMMARYt Request to rezone a .7675 acre tract of land from Planned Development withers Streoetrty located at the No. 40 and SF-7 to corner of Bell Multi-family Avenue, and (MF-I) on southeast BACKGROUNDt See P&Z Report. PROD S DER RTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEDs City Departments, Neighbors FISCAL IMPACTS N/A i ull u dt fit 4Ka ed byt L1 y d V. Harrell City Manager Fes ari Planner Appr vedt r nk H. Robbins, AICP Executive Director Planning and Development AXXOOOBI/3 C L i_. .+AI l Aponda f PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPOT v_~_, Tot Mayor and Members of the City Council Case No.: Z-91-018 Meeting Date,: Jt.nuary 21, 1992 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Marvin Morgan 2286 W. Oak Denton, TX 16201 Current Owner: First State Bank P. 0. Box 100 Denton, TX 76202 Requested Aotion: Rezone a .7675 ac).e tract of land from Planned Development 40 and SF-7 to multi-family - one (MF••1) . Looation and Bizet A .7675 acre tract of land located at the southeast corner of Bell Avenue and Withers Street. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - MF-1; Residential South - MF-1 and SF-7; Residential Bast - MP-1 and SF-7; Residential West - MF-1; Civic Center Park Denton Development Plant Moderate Activity Center. SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: Bell Avenue is an improved collector street and Withers is a local street. Dedication of five feet o£ additional right-of-way on Withers is required. C~ ti 1 D 3 2 1 9 AID AT 1 0 m ' STATE OF TEXAS LOT 7 LOT 9A ~I BLOCK 1 COUNTY OF DENTON HILLSIDE ADDITION WHEREAS, John C. Johnson is the owner of t ier of that certain 0.322 acre tract W of lend situated in the go Puchalski Survey, . Survey, Abstract Number 99G, in the ~L City of Denton, Denton County, Texae, $Aid ks, said traot being all of Lots 1& and 16, Block 4, Hillside Addition, as shows as shown by the plat or hap rwco ded , in Volume 1, Page 13, Plat Records, Othto to fthton County, Texas, said tract r~ ' also being all of thAt tract conveyed to Jo od to John C. Johnson from Martha*99 c J~ Hacker by deed recorded in Volume 3051, P&gi 11, Page 0486, Real Property Records,. Denton County, Texas, and all of that tract at tract conveyed to John C, Johnson M/ TAI TO jc"-r T from Roy PuYsur, Jr. by deed recorded in 4ed in Volume 29850 Page 0776 Real FANN11 re tract being more particularly ij i ~ iron rod in the south right- r ~ i occupied northwest corner of PO F3 utes 46 seconds last with said 4.60 feet to a set half inch N 89' .corner of said Lot 16, also of Bernard Street] FND 3/8' 67.00' ROD utes 45 seconds last with said s of 101.16 feet to a set half 1 z Pt corner of said Lot 15j 0 18' AVER. H ~utea 04 seconds Nest with'tbe 0 ico of 134. S1 feet to a found t ~~t rnrnwr n~ ~ A t nt•- 1 C w J Sf Q Yr ~4t S J I ! fly ~ lam. F a ' r I i 3 LOT a 1 5A M O ~ O I z O V-+ 0 0 H f z H d L . sp I- -j A O V~ Ww t H 6773 SOFT, J H F` - z i 66.96' FND 1/90 S 8965 ROD ~ r 1_ tV fig, ,  nll. MWI~113.~~1~ vwM&ww&V41 wAkpxcwo LOT 14 . 8VRVIY0R' 5 C6RT C 3 A T I F I C A I N BLOCK f KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PPESENTS3 y4~ That I, Stanford Hauptmann, Registered Pk ,ered Public Surveyor, do hereby certify that this plat and description was F nr~ceci fry ~rt~rLa~d accurate survey of the land and that the i found or placed undir my personal supervision with the laws Stanford it EAGLE Texas Reg i Ell-] Land Surv FAMVIN ago !'OLl1NJ arvision or direction in accordance 4 EGEND s~ tanford Hauptmann Date FIP - Found 1/2" Rebar oxas Registered Professional MON - Monument and Surveyor Number 2255 ROW - Right-of-Way SIP - Set 112" Rebar CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL METROPLEX ENGINE -X- - Fence Line F ENGINEERING X PL 501 SOUTH CARRO~L BOULEVARD -E- - Electric Line APPROVED THIS DAY OF (817) 383-1416 DALLAS 2, -T- - Telephone Line GRAPHIC SCALE IN LE IN FEET A,D. 15._ MH - Manhole 0 5 10 20 30 40 5 1 7N inn F I N A L PP - Power Pole I1 LP - Light Pole FH Fire Hydrant e C Center Line 0 3 10 VGINEERING CONSULTANTS BaLI Building Line GRAPHIC SCALE IN I I 4 PLANNING SUR 'EYING U.E.- Utility Easmt. LEVARD SUITE 0 OENTON, TEXAS 76201 O,Eo- Drainage Easmt. JI I LS 21 A.-70AA CART YAOTiJ 7ZA_2A7I C.E.- Communications Easmt. 0 r E FY'- - ,I E ADDITION I 16A, BLOB" r r. r n ■ i 1 I, s r N 1 N S88'45'WE 462.00 one r i' ~CI~ll~1G I SEE LAN03QAft PUM - - - - - - - --6- UTLaY EAMMENT r'ROP; r waleR IIKF Cam- c,~ 1 Paoe.2' 'M - PROP, I I FIRE HYD,1 I I 'r N , N r 0 M KC. I RC I ' t, LLJ I; f l_ CARE CENTER Gr S .RSONA DENTON, TEXAS 1 8. wv r y oj`)d W TULANE SSW PP STREET ul 3 . e- w PROPOS I~ b LOT 18l y ?I C \ 4,86 AC Y ` f . ~i VJ 1 t NORTH o Z I I N~P UNIVERSITY I HYD. PLACE ADDITION I I Kc 1 { RESIDENTIAL OSF-10 L I I  ~ i ~J \ ( 0 / I \ NOTES: 6 TOTAL AREA 4~88 ~~I,d960 S•F- 4.86 AC. aAOP,r- ~o FLOOR TO AREA RATIO 0.23 .0.23 NO. OF REQUIRED PARKING / SPACES 55 •r NO. OF SPACES PROVIDED 65 a~,,D" 11' a MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF MAIN \ \ ZC IjXJ ~ BUILDING...... .354 0 \ MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STORAGE BUILDING 14'-6" TOTAL NO. OF PATIENT ROOMS.....60 ~ r TOTAL NO. OF BEDS....., 120 GROSS FLOOR AREA OF MAIN I ti ' I 1 / a WAIEP LKE3 10 OF 0. NOTES D1'314NED D PER G CXTTY Of F DE NTON FKIILDING.........48,373 . GROSS FLOOR AREA 0° STORAGE tp \ X40 \ BU!'LUING......... 500 S.. co \ e. \ 9 FIRE , b NYD. S16N \ \ ~ ' ~IG' UPI ~IG' UTILITY EASEMENT r f - - i j J,q N 98' 45' 53" W ---h- - _ PP PP PP jmmlp~ i - OENTON CENTER PHASE II SHOPPING CENTER ZONED GR -30. ~11 Y r:l _ - - - z f f LT I 1! 11 l Pf f J /It VI I' = l 'f`r I +5 u (came 2-91-018) konda No. ~ - - ~ Page Two Agonda ltem__ _ fbte SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued) There is an existing sidewalk on Bell; however, the developer will need to install a sidewalk on Withers. Utilities: Water: A twelve (12) inch water line exists on the west side of Bell Avenue, a six (6) inch water line exists on the north side of Withers and east side of Vine street. Sewer: An eight (8) inch sanitary sewer line exists on the east side of Bell Avenue and a six (6) inch sanitary sewer line exists in Withers. Fireflow: Fire hydrants exist at the southeast corner of Bell and Withers and the northeast corner of Withers and Vine. Spacing and coverage are adequate for multi-family zoning. Electric: Single phase service is available from the east side of Bell Avenue per city requirements. Drainages Site grading should be towards Bell. Drainage is adequate for this property. Landecapings A minimum of 20 percent of the streetyard must be landscaped as well as four (4) percent of any interior parking lot. There are several protected trees on this site. Removal of any of these trees will. require a permit. Parkas The Park Donation Policy applies to this multi-family use. A fee in lieu of land is recommended at a rate of one-fourth (1/4) of one (1) percent of the construction value to be collected at the tame of building permit application. The park fee would be used for improvements to Civic center Park. C ti: 1 y (Case Z-91-018) Apondallcrn_ - Page Three N16 - ° - % HISTORY Planned Development No. 40 was j,ezoned on July 6, 1982 from General Retail (GR) and Multi-family (MF-1) for the purpose of general retail and offico uses. On April 3, 1990, the City Council approved rezoning a 1.6 acre tract within this planned development to Single Family-7 (SF-7) for the purpose of building a church. buildings are Some office n of the site is 40 known as "Bell Place."g Thin a e remainder portion n undeveloped. 1 - :4yT ANALYSIS This property is located in a moderate activin allocation Study area Number 50 is currently at thirty-five (35) percent intensity trips. Moderate activity centers are allocated 350 trips per acre. Therefore, this particular site is allocated 268.6 intensity trips. Multi-family use on a .7675 acre tract of land. is allocated 153.5 intensity trips. The applicant is proposing approximately 26 apartment units on this site. With the appropriate landscaping and required parking, the development should be an asset to the area because of the proximity to Texas Woman's University. This request appears to be in compliance with the policies of the Denton Development Plan. , RE1COMMUNDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-91-018 C ti 1 ~ ~J TyNRLIj 4 :f r.. 'A Yfi:Ai C%~ 4[II Nonda No. - - - _ i AgW8 (cage Z-91-018) Page your Dote ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. PD-40 Site Plan 3. Draft P&Z Minutes of December 11, 1991 4. Ordinance " AXX00082 C ATTACHMENT 1 Z 91-018 Morgan Property AgelldaNo. NORTH 0 ;REENV000Ji~i.._.J1~.J ~4 cR. 0ECN-000 ~7ALIA ~EARI _ 1 a PAK~4MN O 7 7 7 w -FOREST ~l/ ` Y LM} WCOD~ ~,F.Q I KE F J m fABERSS V~\v ~`75 REE L~ _W000LANU L,_•~~~ ` ` u0 HOC lTo* 4 L O HWY. soo J L, N- LE ~ = iYU cAtwvs Y,ru u GOLF COURSE I] COLL M. SITE WArNE _ J N _ iN{RD ~ O ~ LA7 WHORE ._I , . INIRO r SEC„ L-~~j y~ PiR TLC 3I(~~~ OAKTREE RED w 4 L 50.W YERf AOC~EOAKz l.__.J TEXAS A;EAOOWOAA \ WE PERG J a c NrfR In 3 WAY I/ USN MANN ERAS I WITHERS Y L PAIS W MAR. • NfR,I G Y I z U• G R ~ NILE & GRE _ LINE IL J` -WOOOPOR ENN N ~ C1• CNAR• 9ASER $ OAWS J ~EC Q ULAND / j OAVIS A(Q$y KENT ILL mc-x oAK UL7 C~ 01t_.J OAK t m s- ~ i~nn HS ff--~~ W I NIKORY El fL u l TY l U ~ u lcKOa~v L_ OE %Ts DATE, 11126191 $CALE: NONE c 1. s Wllheu 61ree1 l e`.1 r'r 'rrr wMrl M ~ 1 wO W., / r E I 1,~ 1 ~ IIM / H pt 11MIIOw 1 ~ ~ Ce ran mlxlnrirtrvlnnnil n~ 1llpl, ~ - _ ~I r ~ uewu 3 0 e PROPOSED OWEN OFFICE COWLEx 1~7'C "rrl lllo.wl 1. r.,ti ` 1 ~ u.. j ~ Gd11yW rowan a r { 37 ;t ATTACHMENT 3 P&Z Minutes y(t~ December 11, 1991 AdondaNo.ll_1L I(` Page 5 '=JJJJ dR,~5 IS d5 T Aponda ilom___ Mr. Appleton said that the project is a good compromise and transitional use. He is concerned about the screening in back. It looks sketchy in some places. Mr. Engelbrecht arrived at the meeting. o Mr. Holt atated that this project will look nice and compliment the neighborhood. He is in favor because most of the drainage isn't from this lot and will be better under the Planned Development than with SF-10. He moved to recommend approval. Motion was seconded by Mr. Appleton and carried (4- 2 . Ms. Hue and Mr. Kamman voted no. III. Hold a public hearing and consider rezoning a .7675 acre tract of land from PD-40 and SF-7 to MF-1 district on property located at the southeast corner of Withers and Bell Avenue. 15 notices were mailed to property owners within 200' feet of the site] 1 was returned in favor and 2 in opposition. Staff Report: Ms. Feshari presented the staff report (attached). Petitioners Marvin Morgan, 2286 W. Oak, stated that if approved, construction will begin as soon as possible. There will be 24 units. The project will blend in with the neighborhood and be an asset to the apartment situation in Denton. Mr. Holt asked how the landscaping ordinance would affect the project. Mr. Morgan replied that so much of the front yard must be green. The apartments will be towards the front and the parking will be in back. There will be three separate 8 unit structures. Me. Huey asked if there is a demand for more apartments. Mr. Morgan said yes. Mr. Holt asked if all the apartments around TWU are occupied. Mr. Morgan said that the last he heard was that there is a 98% occupancy rate in Denton and 105# occupancy is expected. In Favors No one waa present to speak in favor of the 3. .5 r, y P&Z Minutes DRAFT December 11, 1991 Page 6 tbonda No, ADonda Ilaro_ petition. Dalo Opposed: Mary Ann Murkey stated that she owns 906 Bell which is occupied by a yellow house. She is concerned about the entrance to the parking area. It is hard to get out of the driveway of the house onto Bell. Mr. Morgan said that the entrance will be on Withers about 1001 from the intersection of Bell. Recommendation: Ms. Feshari stated that staff recommends eld approval. Chairman Holt closed the public hearing. Mr. Kamman stated that he does not see any problems with the proposal. Mr. Holt said that it will be nice to see the fruits of the landscaping ordinance on apartments. Mr. Kamman moved to recommend approval. Motion was seconded by Mr. Glasscock and carried unanimously (7-0). Mr. Holt left the meeting. x IV. Hinkle Personal Care a. Hold a public hearing and consider rezoning a 19.8 acre tract of land from Planned Development 95 (PD-95) to SF- 16 on property located on the east side of Hinkle. 24 notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the site,, five were returned in favor and 0 in opposition. Mr. Robbins clarified that there are two separate zoning cases for this tract. The first is to rezone the entire PD to single family. The second case is for a SUP on four acres. Staff Report: VS. Feshari presented the staff report (attached). Mr. Engelbrecht asked how many units per acre there would be with SF-16 zoning. 4. i' t n )E 4 a ei\wpdoce\Z91018.0rd ATTACHMENT 4 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 40 (PD-40) AND ONE-FAMILY DWELLING (SF-7) TO MULTIFAMILY DWELLING-1 (MF-1) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 0.7675 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BELL AVENUE AND WITHERS STREET] PROVID- ING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOFI AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. v WHEREAS, Marvin Morgan has applied for a change in zoning for 0.7675 acres of land from Planned Development No. 40 (PD-40) and one-Family Dwelling (SF-7) to Multifamily Dwelling-1 (MF-3.) zoning district classification and use designation) and WHEREAS, on December 11, 1991, the Planning and Zoning commis- sion recommended approval of the requested change in zonings and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the change in zoning will be in compliance with the Denton Development Plant NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION L. That the zoning district classification and use designation of the 0.7675 acres of lt:nd described in Exhibit A, attached to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference, is changed from Planned Development No. 40 (PD-40) and One-Family Dwelling (SF-7) to Multifamily Dwelling-1 (MF-1) zoning district classification and use designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the city of Denton, Texas. SECTION II.. That the City's official zoning map is amended to show the change in zoning district classification. SECTION III. That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $2,000.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall, become effective four- teen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published tw1ce in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official news- paper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992. C BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ~ i J. t .:'91:..55:-y T{ ` Y a ) Agenda No: Agenda Itnm._._.._-•--- ATTEST! JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA A, DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY PAGE 2 t 6. v. b EXHIBIT "A" !g©nda No. A4lenda Item_ D31e Thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 51 seconds West with the east right- 4 of-way of Bell Avenue a distance of 148.00 feet to a found PK nail for the northwest corner of said Lot 1, also being in the south right-of-way of Withers Street= Thence south 89 degrees 13 minutes 39 seconds East with the south right- of-way of Withers Street a distance of 151.15 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing in all 0.7675 acres of land. A C PAGE 3 "7 . h ' ii f CITY CQUNCH 9 F A pooooaaaaaaao~oo e ~D • 4CppO.c ~ ti o~o~ _ Y Q r ~°~oohy oa s oo~'~w rrfry1 ^ co VO v1, W U ~aa a DATE? 01/21/92 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Agenda No. ondaItem- TOi Mayor and Members of the City Council Atg,,te FROM i Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager lki a I SUBJECTS Z-91-017 Rezoning of a 1.63 acre traot of land from the SF-1 ist of to the PD district for medical offices and accessory uses. RECQMMENDATIONS F The Planning and zoning Commission recommended approval (4-2) at their meeting of December 11, 1991. SUMMM's Request to rezone a 1.63 acre tract located on the eaot side of Bonnie Brae, approximately 800 feet south of University Drive. IACKGROUNDs See PAZ Report. PRO-Q ANS. DEPARTMENTS OR OROUQS_ F G EAi Neighbors, Planning Department, Building Inspections FISCAL IMPACTS N/A j Re full e b S.t-td6d Pr pared bli L1 yd V. Harrell City Manager Ka en K. F Shari Ur an Planner Ap r Fr H, Robbins, AICP Executive Director Planning and Development AXXOOO81/2 C C s li AqAConda No. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMIBsroN REPO I`om_~ E IhtoTTQa To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Case No.: Z-91-017 Meeting Dates January 21, 1992 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Marilyn Rose Janke, M.D, 145 South Forest Lane Double Oak, TX 75067 Current Owner: Dale Brown 718 N. Elm Denton, TX 76201 Requested Action: Rezone a 1.63 acre tract of land from SF-10 district to Planned Development and approval of a detailed plan for the purpose cf medical offices and accessory uses. Location and size: A 1.63 acre tract of land located on the east side of Bonnie Brae approximately 800 feet south of University Drive. surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - SF-l0/Residential Use South - SF-10/Church East - SF-10/Residential Use West - Agricultural/Vacant Denton Development Flan: Low Intensity Area. SPECIAL INFORMATXON Transportation: 50 feet of right-of-way dedication from center line of Bonnie Brae as shown, is acceptable. A sidewalk is existing on Bonnie Brae. C 's t ~i ii t Agood.n No. Agenda llein_ (Case 2-91-017) Ualo 1`~1w Page TWO • 7 SPECIAL INFORMATION - Continued Utilities: Water service is available from the 16 inch water line on Bonnie Brae. M Sanitary sewer service is available from the eight inch sewer behind the eastern boundary of the property. A minimum of two (2) fire hydrants are required. Spacing shall be 300 feet based on commercial use. Currently there are no existing fire hydrants fronting this site or within 300 feet. Drainages Storm water will need to be detained on site and run directly into the storm sewer, HISTORY On September 26, 1.990, the Planning and Zoning commission approved the preliminary and final plats of the Dale Brown Addition. This plat represents a seven (7) lot subdivision for SF-10 lots. Because of driveway separation regulations on primary arterials, the plat reflects four (4) joint access drives. On December 11, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Z-91-017 by a vote of 4-2. ANALYSIS Thio site is located in a low intensity area. According to the Denton Development Plan, low intensity areas are primarily intended to protect and preserve residential neighborhoods. Specific policies of the Plan are analyzod for non-residential uses in these areas. e i~ IJ, Agenda No. (Case 0-91-017) Agenda Itens__i~w T" Page Three Nte._~°!1.'~~~1 ANALYSIS - continued policies$ 1. Strict site plan control within 1,600 feet of existing low density residential areas. Developments must maintain the character of the area with architectural design and landscaping. Comments The detailed plan submitted reflects a sensitive layout and design which appears to be compatible with the neighborhood. Three (3) buildings ranging square of 3,000 to 3,500, coupled with extensive landscaping and buffering reflect the applicant's desire of protecting the neighbors. Traffic design to ensure that multi-family and non-residential u8eg have access to collectors or larger arterials with no direct access through residential streets. Comment: Bonnie Brae is a primary arterial. The site design allows for one (1) curb cut in the center of the site. The Engineering Department has reviewad the internal and external traffic flows and has found them to be acceptable. 3. Overall density/intensity standard is not violated, comments This site is allocated 97.8 intensity trips (60 x 1.61 acres). The proposed de~,elopment will utilize 150 trips (10,000 gfa/1,000 x 15). The Plan allows for a disproportionate share allocation when the intensity standard is violated. The proposal is in intensity study area $115 which has 12,550 intensity trips available for allocation. Disproportionate share analysis: a. Adequate infrastructure Bonnie Brae is a primary arterial that is already improved. The capacity of Bonnie Brae is such that the proposed development will not significantly impact the road. Water and sewer are also in place and are sized adequately to support the proposed medical offices. 4 4! ~i t' O~onda iin. _ (Case 2-91-017) Agenda Ilorr Page Your S ~l ANALY8I8 - Continued b. Unusual topography - a This site is relatively level. There does not appear to be any unusual topographical features. c. compatibility with surrounding properties - ,f The detailed and landscaping plan along with the architectural facade indicate compatibility. The floor-to-area ratio (FAR) of the surrounding neighborhood is approximately .23. This development represents an FAR of .14. d. Other plan policies - The applicant, by submitting a detailed plan and conducting a neighborhood meeting, appears to be sensitive to the policies of the Plan which we analyze, For the most part, the proposal conforms to the policies of the Plan. 4. Sufficient green space, recreational facilities and diversity of parks are provided, comments The Landscaping and Tree Preservation ordinance requires a minimum of 20% landscaping in the street yard. The proposed landscaping plan shows 56%, which is more than twice of what is required. In addition, the applicant is proposing , living screens along the boundaries of residential uses as opposed to a wooden or masonry wall. The impervious surface ratio for this site is ,56 percent, 5. Input into planning by neighborhood associations - Comments On November 5, 1991., the applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting in order to obtain input from those in the immediate area who may be impacted. Although the turnout was not as great as they had hoped, overall, the citizens who attended appeared to be pleased with the design. R - N l~enda No. ~ A4cnda//inm (Case Z-91-017) (late _Ly r Page Five /0 ANALYSIS Additional policies of the Plan, applied to non-residential uses in low intensity areas are as follows; n 1. Separation/Access Non-residential uses should not be located within one-half mile from other non-residential uses. Although this site is located .r closer than one-half mile to other uses, from a land use planning perspective, the proximity to University Drive has to be examined. University Drive is located approximately 800 feet to the north of this site. Bonnie Brae, being a primary arterial, has the potential of becoming strip commerciai like University Drive. one strategy of deterring the strip commercial is to consider low to moderately intense office uses. Offices that are designed to be compatible with residential neighborhoods act as a buffer and as a logical land use transition. 2. Concentration The plan also states that the size of non-residential uses vary rom 2 to 5 acres depending on their access to a specific category of thoroughfare. Maximum acreage for primary arterials is three (3) acres. The proposed medical complex is 1.63 acres in size; therefore, this policy is not violated. At the Planing and Zoning Commission meeting of December 19, 1991, there was some opposition by the neighborhood. It appeared as though their main concern was not the proposed land use, rather what additional drainage the proposed land use would contribute to an already existing drainage problem. The drainage regulations in the subdivision ordinance requires new all development to handle on-site drainage in such a manner to not "add-to" existing drainage conditions off-site. The proposed development is of good site design and represents compatible land use to the adjacent neighbors. The applicant has worked very hard with City staff in order to comply with the regulations and to ensure compliance with the overall policies of the Denton Development Plan. i 1, rNT ila 11yyE; C ql (Casa 3-91-017) agondaNo.~I_ page six Apnda I1om RECOMMENDATION Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-91-017 (4-2)• ALTERNATIVES 4 1. Approve petition 2. Approve petition with conditions 3. Deny petition 4. Postpone recommendation ATTACHMENTS a.. Location Map 2. Detailed Plan 3. Landscape Plan 4. Letter to the Neighborhood 5. P&Z Minutes of December 11, 1991 AAA0018E N w ATTACHMENT 1 "r91-017 Janke Property DD'' n ACnrdo Ilom_g, lk~la NORTH _I r_• dE_ 41EE1, TXUNCEaAlRO CJ II ~~n z~~~ I~~° ~ A A L / 'vl,, 4NE~ il1w, I~ I f PS TCXI 1 iTAL AL 1! ~ ~~Mr.~aS. Hby, 380 g I UNIVERSITY 0. cT Rif i _ EMEar NvTON Cr i ~ vES7C,!ES'ER ELEME' C l w L m wi CORpfLL LLj < jr L _rf [CARLTCN Z z [ID LINDEN Iy z y( r_ SITE o CROW 1 N V~ ECA ~ I MCfA9KNA ~ W S£NA I ~I 1 lL SCRIPTURE„ a FT [S.C_RIP7URE EF~~ c~~l - 1 XDUSTRN PL. jw \ l POEN~ N ~pMM~ .a- ` 5~ ItAL N tY Ai.AMO u `l ! W. HICKORY v ]I co 7 STEI.L❑~~ W 4 MI,I,BERAT lV LLJ L 11 777 DATE; 11/25/01 SCALE; NONE ~ I s+u 11e.fMn ~ Site Data w« r ►n r . ur w« Q ~yl'..~ NMM N". All t 1 Vn r vVry Mar. xG 1tN VL ~ i!• N t a. a.w xA ar.r. d S was r. VICINITY YAP I .111IM MN. tlLW r. ff LenM9 M•q j.^L'~-. ~,~/tL!t1 P t t N !{rN...♦ -^^_s l CL ~ ~ I Cr N 'C1 V Ny_ Lt f ` Y L. w~~~~-{1 , Y114'.~ .`.-•-.--J~ i Ia~ lEW3 ji n.a.c fu _iu...c ~ r ~ G 1. t' • ~I.•.i.~xTi.~uY. L--- { -,C•"'a' r..., - 7. T. 1{ _T~`_--- f 4u~ i+ rte 11~ . 1 NAIH T,t[ IL.L.INI •J T plw.ru .n+~ _ _ W I1- I5._. 1 W ' I V 1 I'~m y~aj[, f ~ ~77 1 ~.rl' 11..•1 ti - (A~ F i N LIL'..M ,1. . 1_ . .__111 1_ .1.- ..-•lL t- -lLJ__-__. r•l, I. ! rU A1ln♦1 Y'♦ M:yl I i• ~lil ~.~Y-...~._...)-r--'-".. 1 JiT~ -y_-. la -rt±. ¢ IL.,Waal. .~~°f _I_ ~ - .`•`I'fi.-__~~----..-_. T o N N I E A R A E •HOark s De:aiied 51~e Plan s <t 1 1 , is o' 5111 WMwMIw+ kan IVYOV HNW411 1 WIN 1111. cl"Wa TIM►. wl ' w 0 f ~ ~tl L 1f IY.. 1x rm IL 1 A ~a W 1 y k ~ ATTACHMENT 3 nda o. c~~. _ i~ A nda 110 17 f f~~ s Sz_ 1 C ! - t~ I U. , I FI[d jj I I J t IR -HILL N YJJ V +1M E r F` I l1111iit ffff I~ d, Y . ~ ~ qtr 1 O rv~ . \ .rw u~. Iw 1•M.I Nx wr wY.~.w - rf..w r -ry rwI E4 _ _ _ _ .f• rgouul 6 A tliwY nwwy M ' V vM MnN MI •I lr ~ ~ ~r ' r•N ,..r ~ . I wM w~rlr • ' f NfW r \f4 'fvruwNrfi ua K11~„~V IaVI\f. Ml.l kiYII AIM •~1 1 lf4MyM 144 'i=1 •r MM LN I.w; hIC~Lh Mtll(eVNL I WYW INf, 1'.w 'N w. IUW M\rfl' 1M14 ~1 ru\~ I.w. 1•If 0 .10.'ffM WfffVf'f•4 ~►r:....N f« IWq~11{L•M.•{frN .n. w.~~ 1•n .•Hi u4 ~IVi YNp Mb•1Y{N fa H. ~ f NMfwfAl'N pu,, f•\ wlfw wN ..fl.flfW •NY\IrV. r~tr~ Y~MIf^ff • rl•w• N41•y 14rf. 1. r1\.I wN IW wY i •IIIII•MI. 'mfr l•lfNp•I1N I/IN {11,Ir>w~w ~~^'xw.~Y NYNMY' Ilf(IRif)'Il lp l III If 41, ~~y W Hlo { lt{N 4.Y i' MI • wr Yr.n~ wl, ' NWy rn 1...ury•• n..wl A t', t x ATTACTIMEN'r 4 ~J~atl~yn ~an~¢s, Lam, 2gtg e~c t(f~tuu, <SaUe 207 L~enEon, ~erat 76207 ~~nxd I',d t1[a('~e~fal.lu ~l~nllu htcs 1jminm *.):'~One 18,71 e9s.1 07 ~,If nv, ,y(m edann :a.(<my u~ . 40 06"4 AgondaNO• Arjonda itnm.. October 28, 1991 L~jlO al Dear I am a local pediatrician c3001feetnsouth purUniversitychase of amsht side oping of Bonnie e Brae, approximately Professional offices. this will be the location of my p Potentially, we may be neighbors and I amrthew edtin your opinions and concerns. Because the integrity of your neighborhood andner as hasidentialcarefullycharacterdesigned. I hopetheyoubwilluildingbesasinpsuch excited as I am about this. You are invited to see the design of the site and then preview the building plans on Tuesday. November5th at 6s30 P.M, at my present HCA al). 2515 Scripture, architect* builder, tcity ista(Medical ff, and Irwill ubedpresent ttooansweroquestions.fie if you are unable to attend but would like information, please feel free to contact me at 893-1477. Sincerely, Marilyn R. Janke, M.D. c 11 i 'E ATTACHMENT 5 ulll/'lll'd~~~alll~lll+~04V Minutes Planning and Zoning Commibsi n December 11, 1991 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission o the City of Denton, Texas, was held on Wednesday, December 11, 1991, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 215 E. McKinney. Present= Roy Appleton III, Jim Engelbrecht, Ivan Glasscock, Judd Holt, Mary Evelyn Huey, William Kamman, and Fray: Morgan Present from Staff: Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning and Development; Karen Feshari, Urban Planner; David salmon, Engineering; Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney; and Olivia Carson, Secretary Chairman Holt called the meeting to order. II. Hold a public hearing and consider the rezoning of a 1.63 acre tract of land from the SF-10 district to Planned Development for medical offices and accessory uses on property located on the east side of Bonnie Brae, 24 notices were mailed to surrounding property owners within 200 feet; four were returned in favor, 2 were opposed, and 1 was undecided. Ms. Morgan arrived at the meeting. Staff Report: Ms. Feshari presented the staff report (attached). Mr. Holt asked if staff was at the neighborhood meeting. Ms. Feshari said yes. Mr. Appleton asked if the living screen will be continuous. , Ms. Feshari said that it would be in some areas. The applicant is using berms so the hedge may not be completely continuous. Ms. Huey asked how the berms will affect drainage. Ms. Feshari replied that it will have no substantial effect, The drainage will come down in the same direction. Mr. Salmon explained that the drainage falls towards the street. When Bonnie Brae was constructed the property drained towards the rear. The owner raised the back of the lot so that it drains to the street. The berms will have no effect on drainage. The water will pond in the parking lot and will Y. 'i i P&Z Minutes December 11, 1991 DF Page 2 Agenda No, Agonda Item.,. drain slowly toward the west through an underground' ppe. Petitioner: Fred Gossett of Gossett Construction, 600 S, Elm, stated that he represents Dr. Janke. She has been sensitive in efforts to maintain the integrity of the neighborhood. The artist rendering of the proposed building is traditional and will not detract from the enjoyment of the neighborhood. The a site drains towards the west and will be engineered to do so. Material was previously brought in to make the back of the property higher than the front and if there is a problem it will be corrected. Ms. Huey asked the purpose of the berms. Mr. Gossett answered that they are an attractive way to shield the adjacent homes. There is considerable detail in the landscaping plan. The streetyard has 56% landscaping, and that does not include the living screen on the other sides. The petitioner did not want to impact the well being of the neighborhood. In favor: No was present in favor of the petition. opposed: Linda Lystad stated that the water flows to the north in this area. Her house was built 22 years ago. They raised their house and brought in fill. They had no problems for awhile. When Bonnie Brae was rebuilt, it was not lowered. It is now higher than the surrounding land. The new drains are insufficient for the water. The City has explained that the problem is with drains further down the way but in 1990 the runoff filled up lots and Bunnie Brae was impassable, Any further development to the south will cause worse problems. Mr. Holt asked if she thinks the proposal will cause worse problems. Ms. Lystad said yes. There is less absorption and Bonnie Brae can't i.:,ndle anymore water. The water starts coming down the hil.L across the street. The property in question just adds to the problem and water gets higher, Bonnie Brae skiould be lower but now right now it can't hold the water. G. R. Rawley, 119 Stanley, stated that his lot backs onto the site. The drainage problem is compounded by tho Jehovah's Witness parking lot which drains to the east. A long time ago he learned to scrutinize the little print. The site plan mailed to the property owners is unreadabl.o. Any errors are h ti P&Z Minutes ~nb o J~ December 11, 1991 - Page 3 Agonda Item__ _ a I NO ~Tee unforgivable. This work can't be trusted. The tree is 'in wrong place so it makes the whole drawing untrustworthy. About half of the property drains to the east. Water will come down off of the berms. it is unclear where trees will be on the berm„ The Jehovah's Witnesses put up trees when they came in and when they died they were not replaced, If this project has to go in, a wall would be more acceptable. The building is proposed to be 30 feet high. There are no two story houses around. The property should not be used for other than what it is currently zoned for. He bought his house 25 years ago. If the City cannot stick to zoning then it is in bad shape. The houses are going to be devalued. The landowner knew when she bought the property that it was zoned single family. It is a sad state for people to have to judge what is going on by reduced copies. If the landowner cared, then she would have sent out something readable. Ms. Feshari said that 8 1/2" X 11" reductions are normally sent out but people can come in to the office to look at plans and have their questions answered. Staff recommends approval. Fred Gossett: Mr. Gossett said that the site has been engineered to drain down to Bonnie Brae. His client is not responsible for water coming off the Rayzor property across the street. Water will be retailed on this property and then go down the storm drain. The property is not creating drainage, that is coming from other areas. The site is zoned for SF-1.0 which would have a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of .27 to 30%. There would be more roofs, driveways, and parking than with the three buildings proposed by Dr. Janke, The church is not a part of this project. The berms are not in place yet. They will be built as the property develops. They are required to abide by the City landscaping ordinance. If the landscaping dies, it is required to be replaced by City ordinance. 301 is the approximate height of a one story building with an 8-10 roof pitch. There will only be one curb cut onto Bonnie Brae. Dale Brown, owner of the property, stated that when Bonnie Brae was rebuilt, he built up the lot according to City standards. Ms. Hurry asked what material was used. Mr. Brown replied that it was dirt and rubble from the Bonnie Brae project. 4 46 i# k °r P&z Minutes A December it 1991 AooiidaNo . o, Page 4 _ AElenda Item 113W lirl-V-V 15; ~2/ Chairman Holt closed the public hearing. He said &hatGtne k people living downhill to the north have a drainage problem and they are r:oncerned about development making it worse. What assurances do they have that this will not be the case. Mr. Salmon stated that on-site detention of the water is required. Staff will review plans for the detention and the building plans to make sure they coincide with the plats. The building inspectors will be out there when the parking lot is built. He feels confident the drainage will be controlled up o to a 10 year storm. Currently the drainage pipes go down Bonnie The Rayzor property will continue to go down Bonnie Brae. from system under University is undersized and will be upgraded when the a widens University. single little m family, but inthisprojectthanwouldTberfor is it is only a little bit more. The runoff will be slightly larger and that is why detention is being required. If the property developed as SF-10, then no detention would be required and the water would all go out to Bonnie Brae. This way there will be low areas in the parking lot where water will collect pipe. foot or so deep. it will slowly go down into the drain pip The pips go to University an come out near Twin Lakes. Mr. Holt asked when University would be widened. Mr. Robbins said that the State cannot provide a date. Mr. Appleton asked what would happen if there were a big storm. Mr. Salmon said that if it were beyond a 10 year storm then the water would back up on Bonnie Brae. Mr. Holt stated that it looks like there is a drainage problem but that it would be worse if the property developed SF-10. The proposal might help a little. Mr. Kamman stated that he cannot believe the doctor would want a foot of water in her parking lot. Mr. Salmon said that the City engineering division designed Bonnie Brae and its drainage and instructed Mr. Brown to build u his lots. The site drainage. doctor will lbe hire w during the t op platting process. FYI y rr.-- ?i `i P&Z Minutes December 11, 1991 Page 5 X41 Agonda Mr, Appleton said that the project is a good comp mise,//hnd transitional use. He is concerned about the screening in back. It locks sketchy in some places. Mr. Engelbrecht arrived at the meeting. Mr. Holt stated that this project will look nice and compliment the neighborhood. Hit is in favor because most of ^ the drainage isn't from this lot and will be better under the Planned Development than with SF-10. He moved to recommend approval. Motion was seconded by Mr. Appleton and carried (4- 2). Ms. Huey and Mr. Kamman voted no. , ,g k III. Hold a public hearing and consider rezoning a .7675 acre tract of land from PD-40 and SF-7 to MF-1 district on property located at the southeast corner of Withers and Bell Avenue. 15 notices were mailed to property owners within 200' feet of the site; 1 was returned.in favor and 2 in opposition. Staff Report: Ms. Feshari presented the staff report (attached). Petitioner: Marvin Morgan, 2286 W. Oak, stated that if approved, construction will begin as soon as possible. There will be 24 units. The project will blend in with the neighborhood and be an asset to the apartment situation in Denton. Mr. Holt asked how the landscaping ordinance would affect the project, Mr. Morgan replied that so much of the front yard must be green. The apartments will be towards the front and the parking will be in back. There will be three separate 8 unit structures. Ms. Huey asked if there is a demand for more apartments. Mr. Morgan said yes. Mr. Holt asked if all the apartments around TWU are occupied. Mr. Morgan said that the last he heard was that there is a 98% occupancy rate in Denton and 105% occupancy is expected. In Favor: No one was present to speak in favor of the J SCChht1' c, •,r pLL000F2 Agonda hlo..~+ Agenda Itafri- ,)--q 1e /7-; ORDINANCE NO. - / ROVI)ING FOR A CJGE TEXAS, P ZONING AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, (SF-10) TO I ACRES OF LAND DWELLING FROM O NET CLASSIFICATION FAMILY AND USE DESIGNNATIONr/FORLO1p6[ATELY D Boo FEET DISTRI LOCATED ON ETHE EAST SIDE OF ST UNIVERSITY DRIVE, EPR PING FOR A PE23ALTXLIN THE SOUTH OF W FOR THE DISTRICT; PROM XIMU AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR DETAILED MAXIMUM AN EFFECTIVE DATE. i change in zoning WHEREAS, Marilyn Rose Janke has applied d for or (SF_10) to planned One family for 1.63 acres of land district clas3sification and use designation development (PD) zoning lan for the district; and and for approval of a detailed p on December 11, 19910 the Planning and Zoning in zoning; WHEREAS, of the requested change Commission recommended approval and WHEREAS, the city council finds that the change in zoning an approval of the detailed plan will be in compliance with the Denton Development Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, • THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON dig r~ct Rclassification and use ,FS3'- That the zoning is nation of the 1.63 acres of land described in Exhib t F attached to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference, desig planned development changed Prom one family dwelling (SF-10) to of Denton, Texas. (PD) zoning district ordinance af the Citye designation under the comprehensive zoning orated into g~'CTiON IT. That Exhibit Be attached to and Detail reference, is approved as the Dewar d351of the this ordin e by the district in accordance with Article IV of C ap Code of Ordinances. is amended to SEgj ON T7I. That the City's official zoning map show the change in zoning district classification. person violating any provision of this GF r 10N_I.,- That any p be f fined a sum not exceeding ordinance shall, upon conviction, Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violate $2,000• shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. C 1 ,.S w ` Agenda No, Agenda Ilam Date _L- SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. w PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of January, 1992. 4to BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY A C Page 2 7 r h ,y T~ EXHIBIT A Agenda No, Awoa Ilom_ ~ Dala " LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS I, 21 31 41 5, 61 70 OF BLOCK 1 e DALE BROWN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF DENTON DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS a j `l Q 1 4 Ys a i] l; F Agenda No. "'0 Agenda Rem EXHIBIT B Det6 r• ~l Detailed Plan for Bonnie Brae Medical office Complex: 1. Development Information (1 page). 2. Site Plan with Development Standards (1 page). 3. Landscape Plan (1 page). 'e r. R1Y29N}t~ Y itliY! y DD Aganda No. , 10?' ADonda Item tyre Development Information p2` 1. statement of Intent of Owner. To build and operate professional medical offices. 2. Relationship to the Master Plan. The plan complies with the Denton Development Plan. 3. Permitted Uses, The property may be used for professional medical offices and accessory uses, as defined in Chapter 35 of the Code of Ordinances. 4. Development Standards. As shown on the site and landscape plans. k j CITY: COUNCIL 4 A ~~Qp0goo ppp 0 OO CZ) oa ~O r Q 00~~~000oa~cacc 4. I. r: W. j DATES 01/21/92 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT /0onda No. ~ Q TOt Mayor and Members of the city Council Agondal(em PROMS Lloyd Wto t?~ V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTS PRELIMINARY. AND FINAL REPLATS OT LOTS 15 AND 16, BLOCK 4, H L ADDITIONS INTO LOTS 15A AND 16A r RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning and zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) at their meeting of January 81 1992. SUMMARYt The site of .312 acres is located at the southwest corner of Fannin and Bernard Streets. CSr.rently, the site is the location of one residence- roughly 3/4 of the site is vacant. Duplex use iF, proposed. Public improvements include approximately 235 linear feet of concrete sidewalk. One curb opening is proposed onto Fannin Streets an existing opening onto Bernard will be closed. BACKO OUNDS The applicant initially approached the staff this fall, consequr,ntly submitting the attached proposal (Attachment 1). The City Council has approved the rezoning of this land from single family (SF-7) to duplex (2-F). City services and facilities, including water, gas, sanitary sewer, e telephone, electrical, and solid waste, are available. The replats conform to the minimum requirements of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulationas Chapter 34 of the Code of Ordinances. gRppRAMS, DEPARTMENTS ox a,ROUPS FFECTEDi Residents and taxpayers in Denton. i C 1¢' Q DATES 01/21/92 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT AgondaNo.. G~ Agenda korn„ :;%f TOS Mayor and Members of the City Council [k1(e aV- ~foe PROMS Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTS PRELIMINARY AND FINAL REPLATS OF LOTS 15 AND 16, BLOCK 41 H as ADDITION) INTO LOTS 15A AND 16A llf~~~~~ R OMMENDATIONI The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) at their meeting of January at 1992. SUMMARYS The site of 312 acres is located at the southwest corner of Fannin and Bernard Streets. Currently, the site is the location of one residence- roughly 3/4 of the site is vacant. Duplex use is proposed. Public improvements include approximately One curb opening is proposed eonto 3 Fannin Street) an existing opening onto Bernard will be closed. BACKGROU DS The applicant initially approached the staff this fall, consequently submitting the attached proposal (Attachment 1). The City Council has approved the rezoning of this land from single family (SP-7) to duplex (2-F). Cit! services and facilities, including water, gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and solid waste, are available. The rrelata conform to the minimimi Land dinar.ces. Regulations) Chapter34 of the Codeeofu0r PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUP'S AEFECTEDS Residents and taxpayers in Denton. " 4 44 ~:r. Y y Ys At ~rl~4N:1ylr` tyf r~ "T' 1,~ '~}.,.a ~•.4--~h M~'~ ~ ~:y+.:~~►./`r^rw.liJ. .t'^ ~ f. I ` {1 ~~M11 ryry tt 1 V r e CPO f~ _ 'J"~+ .1J r J f: 'r~J •,r ~T~~ l r[ ~I ( r ~1 r } . 4 IF 9 -4 f 40 q 51 3.. 20 tl N ~~t •1~ / r Al 04 GiR40,9lok'1~M Ile •i `f . N ell rt _ 41 I 14 10 t ~s7 y t ! ~ r :2 1 4 1 ~ lr~ f 3 rf ~ -Y ~ 1 I H,c r I I Qtz f r A ~ t 4 . ~ .1 i J f 1 12„ is o ! ~ ~ ~ t3 lA 1 y~ w 1 i an t w~W~ ~ji i t w in U1 (d iI I " ~.C N l 1(J h C a n r " ~r - 1 1 7E r• r ~ i I 1(! f J 1 1 f • Y ' o f 1 i I t ice. r  ti .~.-v nv nw~>t ~a r~~~1111 CfY 9~111i 6: SC!ltlA3 ~ ~ +y ,'f LAOI WITW MCA SPAS. SM Al 4 r0, 4$ PEI 'Ma 4, il, ~ O~n lA~sfk SJIt, if C~!IPA~IE6, 8EF04E b~ECi44, (Ali! 414; PEP CtV 61'I; if R41 %A; I 1A. U • 'v 1 d I s5~ I ~~'Jn N,Cr d • i tit I a ~ 18 ' i s { 1 st, fat 51 I 1 1~y If! `I l1 L \ ri, All - ool I I 1W 3. ~ 1 ~ y 't~1j5 { I i8 5r~~ 1 \OP i No p fit r f~l~ G o r, 9g 1 I loo" .f a ~ ` Y r~ 20 rte. L• - ! ! 1t • ~Y •uj~1~~ It N 88°a5'53' w t f ILK p !,z. FIR. r `,0„ ,H10„ H B H 4~ H, i • ~ y- I L. s t t`✓--- 8"'H 41N fi uL 6 ~ :ti 9AR6w~+f A H~1 { )Ll 0 Ta i r T L S i 1 I z u. - 1 a t 1 r , LAS, 1 1 1 !am M City Counoil Format Agbnda NO, Hillside Page 2 Apida 110M_ w Date .L:~~" A FISCAL IMPACTI N/A Gap fully a ittedl a Prepared by l yd ar e 1 City Manager Q. Owen Yo15 ASLA Urban Planner Ap x Md, ~ ra H. Robbins, AICP _ Executive Direotor Planning and Devalopment AXX00091/9 C t VA ATTACHMENT 1 Agnnda NO. L ~ P 91-028 Johnson Agottrla 11Orn_._._ Da,u NORTH SCAIPtUAE E c:0 0 =Elmm W, OAK C MCUOnr U~ w, A aC ®~C H o Y 1~`~~~L _ o` 1 ❑ C [7--Iw C L JilJ / y Bj ~ ! n SITE / At li AAi \q I ~ DATE; 112192 SCALE; NONE u co r 8DNW MAt V C_ _ I _ . aoraxc wiAt: r ~1 - - - _ - - Cw.~....PARX ROAD _(V _l 78UE If] AYE. C AM I C4 _ F-11 AK do (I tax MILAN Him U. S,l1T \~lpAj _y5AW0~ SQ. CARROI.L U_- _ ~I~!-.11._....1 jr-A F-1 -l ~I~_~ if-J P11 AL' E,l ~ t. - h ATTACHMENT _2 kienda No, l Agonda III FUN.IN STREET Uale.L~_a~ Lar ,1s B4 0CK 4 n .q ZLor 1s in B4 0CK 4 134 , 6' AS CURRENTLY PLATTED AS PROPOSED REPLAT FANNIN S 7R EE r cla 4 o Lar Jsa Lar JsA d BLOCK 4 r. BLOCK 4 a `Jr' C7 C G (i iIVPLAT Or LOTS 15 R 1G, E?I.Ul.lC 4, IISI..I.A CfJlf kI10 ;TION t .ti e; Lj I r ATTACHMENT 3 R 91-028 Johnson Agonda No. _ Apwa Ilom~ p i7Ctio I f NORTH LOT 7 LOr 81 ? f ~l ' Bc OCK 1 ZOA,FJ MF - it + tI Y~ 1 I )Oyoq IT ` IH~C1 I I I F~rYNJ,IY- V'r F D-. tr"NN IIE ' - + I . ...etM1M7 e- WI feWM - _ elaN"LN _ N 89'574601 E 134.601 "TAU tftu i 2,' + b` ! CII 11W QR vEN"Y Z I I _ 67.00 Nvcq eA a _ r 6RQN~• 1 Pn I R I V i ROCD I ' 1 i' ~C7 CV^, 1 y G"9 \ I I 2 NCiCR I ~ 30- 1 Y 9rC"NORC I - N 11 WIDE I 69 ZONE 2'-F cot 16 MCA r R Cot 15 I 65. ~ I e I _W ~ I Ifl ita y~NCtEA L o r 15,A o L o rr -i;,Q BLOCK 4 8" BL oCk' 4 y f o r , 6773 90,r1, y ,r, J W t ese5 90~rr, I eie I ea. "I _ . as. aaa I ~~~~rrd r ro cuae11N6 ' W 2 5 89"59' 0401 W 134.51' cur I o t o 0 LOr 14 1 HL QCK I ~ ~ ~ ~ r f ZONk°0 SF-7 I ~ If 656 P R E L I M I N A R Y R E R L A T 3, ~ DATE. 112182, SCALE: NONE Y" - / 907 FANNING; txts]IK co HOUSE ~~tr 3 i so .11 4 Z " i th 1 m fi D I t; I~ l7 n q S 00002' 4 i i I CSI `7 M i ~ 101.1 4' L r` ' r, ~ tl (r~. frl o m y: 3 ~ r ti Z ~01 T i 1t H .O aQi a A A4 H 1 Uhl p t y w I I I i tl F 8 r r- 8 S 00000 45 E IOlAB•-== » A. I _ ._i tV ti` MA ICAI.IN • t> B~'RNARO S REST ~ t - - !ONNM(ld/(, A()(,!f/ON U!N/UN 0f 1. N! 0("K 1 a.18l /!iHt1 dll ~f l A J Al l 'a Y F~ k b M ATTACHMENT 4 P 91-029 Johnson Agenda No, f Apmfa Ram_. ;--,Y NORTH tot I cot Am NEEUIN AMMON AoCN / _ W A W! ~I CO F STREET_ ' I N 84'SY 46' E 134,b0' I SIP SIP Am a1,SJ' SIP a3, 10. ! A(4 I I I LS' WIDE P01 la' AVERAGE Bull INS I14r OEQicAiroN 3' WIDE SIDEWALK I ! FADEALK I Q~ I w I a LOT a LOT i a a 154 ~6A a~ OI a o + o ° 8 ~f go , a~ d ~I o y r $ 'TI 9 FIR I i a3aa b I~lf sa,rt, I ^V 677] SS Jt. I I ~V. Uo S 84'59'04' w 134,51' SIP SIP Ap 888 I NILLSIOE iOO111ON cot tr N ax 4 F I N A L R E P L A T C DATE,; 112192 SCALE; NONE 4. v llII 'CI n~ Or 1 M N 00'03'41- N L J IOLII' o V 10 ~ i 4 r a ~ H ` z I~ H w z Rr• p n i O Q y ~ a b 00'07'11' L I~ T n m 101. LI' h 111 1[/0 "n IS- I o I! H Z7 Z % ~f ~ ~ n x AVERAGE EUILRING LIRE A 1 y D r _ i N A 101.16' _ n ~ m m S 00'00' 46' E 101.16' i S i BEh'NARQ_._ STREET 60' N.U. M, AEtF.p UE01f Af ION n r, D jo*v't *,rove ow) Z A Ye { ATTACHMENT 5 P&Z Minutes January 8, 1992L Aoan(la hJo r RL FT Page 14 AUontla b. Consider the preliminary plat' of Lot 11 Block 1 of Food Lion T-2 Addition. the Staff Report; Mr. Yost stated that the site is 4.116 acres. The public improvements being offered by the applicant include one off-site fire hydrant on Windsor, one on-site fire hydrant, approximately 410 feet of sidewalk along Locust Street, and a right turn lane from Locust onto Windsor. The plat conforms to the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. The Development Review Committee recommends approval. Petiti.onert Robert Marshall stated that he is the engineer and surveyor for this property with the firm of Goodwin an6 Marshall at 6001 Bridge Street, Fort Worth. He is available to answer questions. Mr. Engelbrecht moved to recommend approval of the preliminary plat of the Food Lion T-2 Addition, Lot 11 Block 1. Motion was seconded by Ms. Huey and unanimously Y carried (6-0), I . :210111, Hold a public hearing and consider the preliminary and final ln replats of Lots 15 and 16, Block 4 into Lots 15A and 16A, Block 4 of the Hillside Addition. Nineteen notices were mailed to property owners within 2001 of the site] two were returned in favor of the replat, staff Reports Mr. Yost stated that this tract is being rezoned from Single Family to Two Family. The replat conforms to Chapter 34 of the Code of Ordinances. Mr. Holt asked if the curb cut would bo on Bernard and if the one on Fannin would be closed, Mr. Yost said the proposed curb out will be on Fannin. The existing curb out on Bernard will r)e closed. Petitioners John C. Johnson, 2905 Pensylvania Drive, stated that he is the owner of the lots, The replat is just housekeeping. Nothing has been done with the lots since 1947. In 2947 the lots were divided, People have lived on the lots and bought and sold them, but no one has ever tried to got a permit to do anything with them. The lots are 501 wide, Current requirements are for 60' wide lots, By turning the r lots around 90 degrees, the lots can be made into lots that `l r 4 ti P&2 Minutes rbentla No..._~~ January 8, 199 ggpqtlg Ilom-- _r.. I.J Page 15 are 60' by 100'. Thac meets current requirements. No one was present to speak in favor or in opposition to the replat. Recommendations Mr. Yost stated that the Development Review Committee recommends approval. Chairman Holt closed the public hearing. Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of the prelimanry and final replats of Lots 15 and 1.6, Block 4 into Lots 15A and 16A, Block 4 of the Hillside, Addition. Motion was seconded by Mr. Engelbreeht and unanimously carried (6-0). V. Hold a public hearing and consider an amendment concerning signs to Planned Development No. 142, a 245 acre tract. Staff Report: Mr. Robbins stated that there is now a new opportunity to take another step with a development that is probably the most important from an economic standpoint of all the developments that active in the community at this time. It is also important to further a major goal of the DDP which is balanced growth. This is the site of the proposed regional outlet center, Some of the actions that have occurred on this property in the past include the approval of a development plan, the council approved the expansion of water utilities based on economic development potential, and last night they directed staff to facilitate moving the 1-35 exit ramp to Loop 288. The cost of moving the ramp will be born by the developers. The proposal tonight amends the Hillarest PD ordinance to adopt the special sign district criteria and ` procedures outlined in the sign ordinance. He reviewed ordinance language with the Commission. He ,aid that the developer is proposing to add language to the existing PD to specifically address using the special sign district provisions. This is not a proposal to deviate from sign provisions but to be explicit about what the rules will be when it is time to do the detailed plans. They can go by the sign regulations but if they deviate, then special sign district standards will be applicable, The Commission discussed the proposal. Petitioner= Don Dillard, 5000 Thanksgiving 'Power, Dallas, stated that they are trying to avoid creating a completely new sign district. They are trying to abide by as much of the 6. , M =a r M k ICITY COUNCII a ouaaao . oooo°°o' 'c~oc4,~ +pppa ~ ~ ~°°O a° ~ x o o uL. y i~~_3L~J+~J~1~~1~+..J}1...♦~~1. ~.r1 ~1. J~1-F~4 L.I~a. '"•~~{-S~.i.~1-'-'.:.-.~:.'~.i`~«.:.;: ~ 1. 1 v Y' S {i ail r, r DATEt 01/21/92 TO I CITY CCU CI t.~.iEppRT FC Mam Mayor and Members of the , FROM t City ~ouncll Lloyd V. Harrell, city manager A900daNo. SUBJECTr PD 142 (HILLCREST A001103110r), , I t SIONAOE The Planning and 2onin meeting Of Jenua g Commission cocommended approval (6-0) at their SU~t The petition requests amendment ordinance concerning signs, °g glee the PD 142 t 'crest) zoning PD deviate from the sign ordlnanceQ the nr quests th h (Hil the specfal si an the e G00 review of gn District section of the the s tprocedures andE elgnria of 1arltof signs, excopt thnt signs tn a PA deailed plan with less than t fast of Frontage could be reviewed. apply to the ~~tvRQ~ 8e9 PAZ Report, P_~._RAM__"DF'F~P,~NT3 Q d OUPS AFFE` CT'Ebt Developers of ""crest, Planning and Development Department 4AL ~p~Cpr N/A R fully, eu 1_ttH~r L1 yd V. Harrell APp ovod City Manager t. ank/AF1: °RobSL~L.- -nni ~ ATCP Exeoutivo Director Planning and Development AtL'echmnntt P&rL Report A:: X0oo01 /.10 4 i r. ~ z q Y +'yl Adonda No. Agonda 1~0m_ G 9Y PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT Tot Denton Planning and Zoning Commission Case No.t Z-91-022 Nesting Dater 01/21/92 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicants Rancho Vista Development Co. 500 Thanksgiving Tower Dallas, TX 75201 Don Dillard Current Owners Same Requested Actions Amend PD 142 concerning signage review criteria and process. Location and sizes 245 acre tract located on the east side of 1-35N both north and south of Loop 288 (under construction). surrounding Land Use and Zonings North - Agricultural, Commercial; 76 Truck Stop South - PD 113 Planned Mixed-Use District East - Conditioned Light Industrial & SY 161 Vacant- Residential West - IH-35N Denton Development Plant Urban Center. HISTORY On July 16, 19910 the City Council approved the rezoning and Development Plan of this tract of land from Agricultural District. to Planned Development District for the purpose of a mixed-use C t 4 •s 3 r! it bonds No, _ _ (Ca:ae 2-91-022) AOondaltom,., Page Two nn,, fl 0 HISTORY business center. This development would conform to the regulations of the Sign Ordinance. On April 2, 1991, the City Council approved an amendment to the , Sign Regulations, creating a new section referred to as a special Sign District. This new district was designed to enable flexibility by providing for the application of site specific and sign specific review standards. ANALYSIS The applicant is requesting an amendment to this Planned Development to allow for more flexibility for effective signage. Attachment W2 is what the applicant is proposing. in essence, the applicant is requesting that they be allowed to utilize the procedures and criteria set forth by the special Sign District with the exception of the 600 foot requirement for creating a special sign District as that would apply during the review of a detailed plan. in other words, an individual detailed plan's frontage may not be 600 feet. PD 192 was approved with the following language (see page 11): L. Landscaping, Trees, and Signs; The regulations of the Denton ' Landscape Code in effect on the date of the approval of this plan, shall apply to the district. The language in the sign regulations pertaining to Planned Development follows: 3. panne 7ev Qpment Dish icts. The regulations for signs located in planned development zoning districts shall be contained in the ordinance or concept or detailed plan approved for this district except that no off-premise signs shall be permitted. Should the regulations for signs be omitted from i' c ti ti f kjonda No. ~ :-CI n/~~ (Care Z-91-022) Agentlaltam_/__ ~J Page Three ANALYSis - Continued an ordinance or concept or detailed plan for the district, the sign regulations that would be applicable to the most restrictive comparable zoning district classification based upon the land uses permitted therO.n, as determined by the Executive Director of the Department of Planning and community Development shall be applied to the aistrirt, or part thereof, for which the regulations were omitted. The applicant currently has the option of the following provisions of a Special Sign District, which was adopted by the City Council to provide more flexibility. Should the City Council reconsider the sign ordinance pertaining to the 600 foot provision in the Special Sign District, the applicant would most likely achieve his goal., "to provide restrictive and coordinated, ;yet flexible, set of management rules for Hillcrest Center, si.gnaga." Following are applicable components of the node of Ordinances, SIGN __QRD,TNANCE K. SPECIAL SIGN DISTRICTS 1. Purpospo The purpose of a special sign district is to allow properties to deviate from the single regulations of this article if a qualifying property has an alternate comprehensive plan that is g.leArly superijo to what could be accomplished under standard regulations. 2. Application and -Plans. Any person requesting the creation of a special sign district, or amendment of a sign district, shall submit an application, the fee and the required plan, along with any other information specified by the administering department. 3. Sign Plan- The sign plan for the district shall show, in the form and manner specified by the department, the location, setback, size, and height, of all signs regulated by this article and any other conditions, restrictions, or regulations that will apply to the district. 1 h a t~ r Ag~ntla No. ~ (Case 2-91-022) ArPnda llani~_.W~ - Page Three ANALYSIS - Continued an ordinance or concept or detailed plan for the district, the sign regulations that would be applicable to the most restrictive comparable zoning district classification based upon the land uses permitted therein, as determined by the Executive Director of the Department of Plasining and Community f)ovelopment shall be applied to the district, or part thereof, for which the regulations were omitted, The applicant currently has the option of the following provisions of a Special Sign District, which was adopted by the City Council to provide more flexibility. Should the City Council reconsider the sign ordinance pertaining to the 600 foot provision in the Special Sign District, the applicant would most likely achieve his goal: "to provide restrictive and coordinated, yet flexible, set of management rules for Hillorest Canter signage." Following are applicable components of the Code of ordinances. SIGN ORDINANCE K. SPECIAL SIGN DISTRICTS 1. r osg. The purpose of a special sign district is to allow properties to deviat;e from the single regulations of this , article if a qualifying property has an alternate comprehensive plan that is -cj9 rly _ a. et -r to what could be accomplishad under standard regulations. 2. -p%J-JvAtiQ-q-=i..JLjL=4 Any person requesting the creation of a special. sign district, or amendment of a sign district, shall submit an application, the fee and the required plan, along with any other information specified by the administering department. 3. " n Ej"_,_ The sign plan for the district shall show, in the form and manner specified by the department, the location, setback, size, and height, of all signs regulated by this article and any other conditions, restrictions, or regulations that will apply to the district. Y, t! is a (Case 2-91-022) Apentlailom _yC Page Four fkiu L,~V~`.~ ANALYSIS - Continue! 4, a 'e .Si£ plan, In considering a district and sign plan, the commission and Council shall consider, but are not limited to considering, the following: (a) Scale, The relationship between signs scale and site scale. (b) Color. The relationship of sign color to the color of property, buildings, and landscaping. (o) Material and shape. The materials and shapes of signs and how they relate to their surroundings. (d) .Landscaping. The relationship of signs to landscaped features in and outside the district, (e) Illumination. The impact and compatibility of sign illumination. (f) Integration. How the signs in the district are integrated into a unified development concept with the topography, building design, landscaping, traffic circulation and other development features, 5. 9XVAti9j]_t The Council may approve the creation of a sign district for any property which has more than 600 feet of continuous street frontage on one public street if it finds the districts (a) provides a comprehensive plan for signs that would be ' clearly superior to what would be allowed without the plant (b) would be compatible with surrounding propertiost (a) Is not being used merely to avoid or gain a variance of the sign regulationst (d) 17oes not violate the spirit or intent of the sign regulat:ionst and (e) Complies with the requirements of this section. `r { t k Y V it Agenda No, ..._ZOC Agonda lli, (Came Z-91-022) Ikle.-LfC"~~- Page Five Q¢ ~p !1~/,j ANALYSIS - Continued 6. C d tiorga T no ed. The Planning and Zoning Commisslon may recommend and the city Council may impose appropriate conditions concerning the placement or use of ziigns in the district in order to protect surrounding properties, the community, and comply with the intent of this section. 7. Proced a The procedures for approval of a sign district and thereafter any amendment of the district, shall be the same a as those applicable to a change In zoning classification or regulations. 8. pesian~tion on zoning. app Property approved as a special sign district shall be shown on the official zoning map with the abbreviated designation "SD". 3. Planned Lg_y optent tr tsThe xeJ~tiong--L %jgns_ logated in___Dlanne~ develobment~'f~] riots shall ~~e gontained in thg ordingW_L or concegt- e a L_ n7 mn annX yLl fgr_the district, except that no off-premise signs shall be permitted. Should the regulations for signs be omitted from an ordinance or concept or detailed plan for the district, the sign regulations that would be applicable to the most restrictive comparable zoning district clafssification, based upon the land uses permitted therein, as determined by the Vxecutive Director of the Department of Planning and Community Development, shall be applied to the district, or part thereof, for which the regulations were omitted. ~N?~G oRDZt~c~ The following language in the Planned Development section. r~~r Provisio~sl A. 1, E,4rpoqg, The purpose of this article 1E, to provide for the creation of Planned Development zoning districts. These districts are intended to provide for the development of land as an integral unit for single or mixed use in aecordanca with a plan that ria ar fin a established . C r: Mono No, (Case Z-91-022) Aponda~ile~m9_1~_ Page six Il~lo=e41_, ANALYSIS - Continued regulations of other. zoning Ais ricts. They are also meant to encourage flexible and creative planning to ensure the compatibility of land uses, to ullow for the adjustment of changing demands to meet the current needs of the community, and to provide for a development that is + superior to what could be accomplished in other zoning districts by meeting one or more of the following purposes; (a) Provides for a design of lots or building, increased recreation, common to open space for private or public use; berme, greenbelts, trees, shrubs, or other landscaping features; parking areas, street design or access; gI other development plans amenities or Featuresbg ou]d be of special benefit to thg property ungrs or coms~unit~ 4. Commissigii Approval of Detailed Elam The Commission is delegated the authority to approve a detailed plan or the amendment of, a detailed plan for property for which a development plan has been approved by the City Council, unless no detailed plan has been approved for the property within ten years of the date of approval of a development plan, in which rase the detailed plan must be approved by the City Council., after notice and hearing. The approved detailed plan shall be attached to the ordinance establishing the District, The Commission shall approve the detailed plan if it finds thatc (a) The plan complies with the general concept plan or development plan approved for that property; (b) The plan provides for a compatible arrangement of buildings and land uses and would not adversely affect Ajoining neighborhoods or properties outside the plan; (c) The plan provides for the adequate and safe circulation of vehicular traffic; and (d) I_fhe _ p? ~n --is _ in subs antial om~?lidneo watt the dscape,__sian aupdivision and ox regulations of he City~_ot,_i not,__the_plan offers corresondina benef is that_mor_t dpvigtion fr-om_tl~oea oryUlat.ions. (A lp 1 s ~s r i i Aponda Na.._ (Case Z-91-022) Ado da Item. pegs seven l13~a 4r~ ~ 'r ANALYSIS - Continped rrV/H/J-- 5. Conditions Im ose , The Commission or the City Council may impose conditions concerning the location, use, c arrangement, construction or development of the District in order to ensure the appropriate use of the District and to protect surrout.ding properties. (underling for emphasis) RECOMMENDATION , The Planning and Zoning commission recommend approval of the applicant's proposed amendment (6-0). ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition 2. Approve petition with additional conditions 3. Deny petition 4. Consider directing P&Z to consider amending the Sign Regulations concerning the 600 foot requirement for the creation of a Special sign District, 5. Return 'the petition for further consideration by P&Z. ATTACHMENTS 1, Location Map L 2. Proposal from Applicant 3, Ordinance 91-1.01 Excerpt 4, P&Z Minutes AXXOOOA3 It i i3 i ATTACHMENT 1 Z 91-022 Hilicrest Center ACenda No. --14A Agonda Ilefn___ Dale _ ~nIV-- NORTH h a i SITE \ I I I 1 ~ hy~ lI U 1 ~ 1 Va JGEa \1~1 ~J C \_J {C-~ °A1Nr OR, LOW 9. C .ti c r' 1 I = I I 0: 00-1- C rs ~J i~----__-~- - L wrsrcat~ WMXIL l i z ~ 4.11 Q < lJl ~ I e C l r Y. Rf ~ a r ti i' • it 'r- ATTACHMENT 2 Agenda No. AMENDMENT T6 Agonda [tern - BILLtlREBT CENTER FD ZONING tk+le.'~~1~.7 INTRODUCTION 111hisa proposed amendment to the P,D. zoning ordinance (Ordinance 41- 101) for the, 245 ac, tiilicrest Center Development in Northwest Denton will provide a high level of sign oontrol and aesthetics with flexibility to assure a quality mixed-use business canter within Hillorest Center Planned Development (PD), Killorest Canter Planned Development (PD) was approved with the Denton Sign Ordinance as the regulating ordinance for signs within the PD, The proposed amendment will provide market sensitive sign regulations for the PD and also provide for the astabliahmant of harmony and uniformity between the planning, architecture and signage within the Hillorest Cantor Development. Those provisions constitute a restrictive and aoordinatud, yet flexible, trot of management roles for Hillorest Center signage. AMZ"XZNT All signage (location and design) within the Hillorest Center Development (PD) will be governed by the provisions of the Sign Regulations of the Denton zoning Ordinance, except as modified by the following special provisions. Review of proposed sign plans shall be in accordance with the criteria and prooodures of the special Sign District provision of Chapter 33, Signs, Code of Ordinances, except that plans may have less than 600 feet of continuous root Frontage on one public street. 1 ✓ e FT I I ATTACIIMENT 3 A Agenda IJo, Developmer_t Plan • Rillcrest Center Agonda fomry___ - Page 6 die f J. Calculations of FAR Parking facilities shall not be included in calculating floor to area ratios. K. Road Alignments: Adjustments in the location of roads shown on this plan may be made without amendment of this plan if approved by plat or detail plan. All public roads shall be designed and constrnaed in accordance with City of Denton design criteria and construction standards in effect at the rime of detail plan approval, L. Landscaping, 'Dees, and Signs: The regulations of the Denton Landscape Code in effect on the date of the approval of this plan, shall r apply to the district, r M. Westgate Neighborhood Buffer/Screen: A brick screening wall, six (6) feet in height, shall be provided along the north and west edge of the existing Westgate neighborhood, which shares a common aoundary with this district. This screening wall shall be constructed in Its entirety prior to the issuing of e building permit for the construction of any building south of Westgate Road, It shall meet or exceed the requirements of the attached Standard Details for Thin Wall Mck Screening Wall (see Paragraph 91D). N. Pedestrian Aeatas and Circulation: Presently, there is no public pedestrian accesa(circulation system (existing or proposed) adjacent to any portion of the district's boundary. In the event a public pedestrian system develops adjacent to the district's boundary prior to approval of a detail plan on property within the district next to the public pedestrian system, such public pedestrian system will be recognized and extended by development within the district. Sldewallts will be constructed along both sides of all public roads within the district. Use of meandering sidewalks within easements outside public rights-of-way will be permitted. $L 1~.4 Itnr►aet AxnalY,El~ A traffic impact analysis has been prepared and submitted on the basis of maximum development within the disuict of 5,300,000 square feet, The City of Benton may require the preparation and submission of an updated traffic impact analysis under either U the following conditions: If any on-site or adjacent public roadway, or controlled intersection on such roadways, reaches a trahfilc flow level which exceeds capacity (defined as worse than Level-of-Service (LOS) C). Requested development would exceed 61300,000 square fret. 11. NVISTA~XIIIe~~F:~XUIM.lO v. ~F „ ~t 14 ATTACHMENT 4 ~ P&Z ~I~~~eUUnn~~VTT.i Minutes DU ~.515January 8, 1991 Page 14 A - [kilo I b. Consider the preliminary plat of Lot 1, Block I of the Food Lion T-2 Addition. Staff Report: Mr. Yost stated that the site is 4.11 4 acres. The public improvements being offered by the applicant include one off.-site fire hydrant on Windsor, one on-site fire hydrant on the southwest corner of the site, approximately 410 feet of sidewalk along Locust Street, and a right turn lane from Locust onto Windsor. The plat conforms to the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. The Development Review Committee recommends approval. Petitioner: Robert Marshall stated that he is the engineer and surveyor for this property with the firm of Goodwin and Marshall at 6001 Bridge Street, Fort Worth. He is available to answer questions. Mr. Engelbrecht moved to recommend approval of the preliminary plat of the Food Lion T-2 Addition, Lot 1, r Block 1. Motion was ss:conde.d by Ms. Huey and unanimously ` carried (6-0). V. Hold a public hearing and consider an amendment concerning H~ signs to Planned Development No. 142, a 245 acre tract. Staff Report: Mr. Robbins stated that there is now a new opportunity to take another step with a development that is probably the most important from an economic standpoint of all the developments that active in the community at this time. It is also important to further a major goal of the DDP which is balanced growth. This is the site of the proposed regional outlet center. Some of the. actions that have occurrsd on this property in the past include the approval of a development plan, the Council approved the expansion of water utilities based on economic development potential, and last night they directed staff to facilitate moving the 1-35 exit ramp to Loop 288. The cost of moving the ramp will be born by the developers. The proposal tonight amends the Hillcrest PD ordinance to adopt the special sign district criteria and procedures outlined in the sign ordinance. He reviewed ordinance language with the commission. He said that the developer is proposing to add language to the existing PD to specifically address using the special sign district provisions. This is not a proposal to deviate from sign provisions but to be explicit about what the rules will be when it is time to do the detailed plans. They can go by the 12. 'r. E? U U~ P&z Minutes January 8, 1991 1~ d h! r Page 15 Agaifda Ilom___ sign regulations but if they deviate, then special sign district standards will be applicable. The Commission discussed the proposal. Petitioner: Don Dillard, 5000 Thanksgiving Tower, Dallas, stated that they are trying to avoid creating a completely new sign district. They are trying to abide by as much of the sign ordinance as possible. They have over 10,000 feet of frontage of 1-35 and Loop 288. They want it to be viewed as a total so that when they came in with a sign plan for a project; whether it is 1000 feet or 200 feet, it would come to the Commission as part of the site plan. If it meets the sign regulations, it would be okay. If it is something different, then you would have a special procedure you would use to review it by the sign district regulations. They would like to follow that procedure. It would still have to go to Council. They just do not want to be restricted by 600' rules. That is the issue in essence. It is a unique PD and zoning. They just want a little flexibility subject to City approval. Mr. Holt said that if they sold 100 feet they would be able to get something akin to a variance as opposed to someone that bought 100 feet on University. Mr. Dillard said that the person would be in a PI) that has unique zoning. Mr. Holt said that on University they would be stuck with the sign ordinance but in the PD the city would have the option of approving something different, which might even be better than what the sign ordinance requires. Mr. Dillard said that Hwy. 380 is already pretty much developed and any parcels that are sold will probably be smaller ones, in an area that is undeveloped, there is more flexibility to do sign plans that have an architectural flavor. The City always has the option that if they don't like it they can turn it down. The burden is on the developer to prove that it is unique and worthwhile sign plan. Mr. Fngelbrecht stated that the Commission should keep in mind the goals of the sign ordinance to reduce clutter and improvs visibility. This iu going to be coming to the commission in little pieces. While there may he improved architectural style, the other goals may be overlooked. C 13. r. ~l r E 1 P&Z Minutes A A January 8, 1991 Apanra tam- DIR Fri P age 16 Agonfa Ia In favor: No one was present to speak in favor of the petition. Opposition; No one was present to speak in opposition to the petition. Recommendation: Mr. Robbins said that staff recommends approval. Chairman Holt closed the public hearing. Mr. Robbins clarified that the staff is recommending approval ~ of the language in the petition. That may not be the way the language is written ultimately. Mr. Morris commented that the Legal Department does have a problem with the Planning Department's interpretation of how signs can be treated in PDs. That; statement is for future reference. As to the particular issue before the Commission tonight, they have some concerns about using a particular PD amendment to make an exception to the general ordinance. The ordinance says that with 606 feet of frontage, there can be a special, sign district. This amendment adopts those provisions except for that particular requirement which he assumes means that in future PDs the Commission could also adopt any other particular portion of the sign district regulations and leave out other parts. They have a problems with that general idea. The commission should address this case on its merits at this point and the legal issues will be addressed at the Council level. These issues probably will be discussed with future PDs. It was moved by Ms. Morgan, seconded by Mi Engelbrecht and , unaniii-jusly carried (6-0) to recommend approval of. 7-91-022. ,e°' ol.ivia\jan8pz 14. ` C i C r. s E, {i ii 1 ALL0010E k0rlda No, Agenda Ilem_ R110 . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 142 (HILLCREST CENTER) TO PROVIDE FOR THE METHOD OF APPROVING SIGNS IN THE DISTRICT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: p=Qrt I. That paragraph 7, (L) ("Landscaping, Trees, and Signs") of the Development Standards of the Development. Plan ("Exhibit B") for planned development district 142 (Hillcrest Center), as adopted by Ordinance No. 91-1011 is amended to read as follows: L. Landscaping, Tres, and Signs: The regulations of the Denton Landscape Code in effect on the date of approval of this Plan shall apply to the district. The sign regulations for each platted property within the dis- trict shall comply with the standards applicable to nonresidential zoning districts, except that the City council may approve an alternative comprehensive sign plan for a property in accordance with the criteria and procedures applicable to special sign districts as pro- vided for in the Code of Ordinances, but without the requirement that the property have 500 feet of contin- uous street frontage on one public street. SECTION _11., That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992. BOB CASTLLBERRY, MF:YgR - ATTEST: JEN14IFEIZ WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: i `e o, f * 4; CITY COU'NCL 4 r~ y i r 1 ~QQQQ°~4°n►aa ~NUUU ono ` ~~°o 0 O~OOOwo T O N Y 6 QQOJ~~ °~oocticcoo°° _ y. f 6 DATE: 01/21/92 CITY SOUNCII, REPORT_ FORMAT i Agenda No. TOt Mayor and Membere of the City Council A901100 l FROMt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager alt1 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE FOOD LION T-2 ADDITION= LOT 1, BLOCK 1 R9COMMENDATION: + The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) at their meeting of January 80 1992. :i RY: The 4.116 acre tract is located on the southeast corner of Windsor Drive and Locust Street. The land is currently undeveloped, and is proposed for a 32,710 square food supermarket. Public improvements to be constructed by the developer include one on- site hydrant, one off-site fire hydrant, approximately 410 feet of concrete sidewalk, and a right-turn from Locust Street onto Windsor Drive. Two curb openings are proposedi one each onto Locust and Windsor. Five feet of right-of-way will be dedicated on Locust. iiACK0R0UNDt The current zoning is Planned Development (PD-72) which proposes neighborhood service for this Bite, Simultaneous with the preliminary plat, the applicant is seeking detailed plan approval. City servicen and facilities, including water, gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and solid waste, are available. The plat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations) Chapter 34 of the Code of Ordinances. 2E Obi l DEPARTMENTS OiUM, U-PS AFF.EEg. EDI Fire Department, ftgineering Divielon, Residents and Taxpayers in Denton. :dot efdnN~ F f i Ayonda Pao, " City council Format Food Lion-T2 Agooda i~etn Page 2 Wto FISCA IMPACII r4 N/A Aeapec idly aubrPi edt L Lloyd Harrell by t City Manager Pre Owen Yoat, -ASL Urban Planner woe Approv Fra bb n AICP Planni Execut ivend Development r Planninga AXXOOO91/7 y ATTACfSMSNT 1 Agenda vo N 91-029 Food Lion Agendallem__1 - IWO / - ,NORTH y4I~ ` ~ is ° SIIAY1 ~ „ ( a Y9LLAOR r i A®ol1 0 two H F CIF. ~~SI ~ / WIN9SOR w,Hor~ ew+v, _ S~ 0 WINOSOfi~'01 05~ F~ -~110111'~~ *Not \k a ~ eNOaK ~u « r TL-- EME ' ~wwo aR~ V - jo. f waTrarou l e e ss D C 1 T -7- -IT IL E ° W .Lglq g01T10N U 7' fMPGPOU i Hwy. 380 ~ / u'--~a❑ w ivu TWU 00 YJ E"E" I'R:t, i 1 I L.Jll DATE; 12121191 SCALE; NONE / r. y, h i a i m . z A JOYI... M:.. z s 8RWK [LM _IL - letiw~ri 4N ~.f J lOctLT__-( _ - Jm LOCUST F. M. 21G4 - _ F. M, 21G4 Q}~ - y - ~ rfcsaN n fOMLFq LI / z ° 1-4 _YEIi_.li III _Jl-!f_ ~ yF m na rr ~ U Y- srrn acymr_r ~rma_1 1oUE` n j ° I \-(EE r li 1 NAIEM000 ~ ~~I1f ~ _ fi oyo / l % Y+ ,.1, 1 1 4l ATTACHMENT 2 i P 91-029 Food Lion Agenda No. Agonda Etom_ wle f NORTH WINDSOR bR I VE p _S 6W40'30* E -oq NYE .436.89' - s N 5 o I I r> 1 I Ja p ~ H ;2 ~J° I W r~ I J 1 W J f o to PROPOSED LOT' I ~V) a 1 IN ! 79, 3Q~ :S , F Y t °zL, Co a 4, 116 Acres J°~. J Nla CURRENT ZON IM 'PD-72 W41 PROPOSED 'ZONING PD 0 1 I&°1 r ! ~ 1140 ~ - J a7 to I 9 I _I 3 LL y~ r7 I h~ >~J~ o IV1 rcw ~ ~ ~ N 89. 18'354 W 432.78 P R E L I Ml NARY v, f P L A T n _ DATE: 1/2/02 SCALE; NONE 4 4 Y. a ~ LOCUST SD IIIOHT TURN LANE ORIVf ~7 iRq~,Vg` 20 FOOT a STAK- TV'I/7' 31 E: --:„•~.a~ _ 4.1 d 96.. 1 E h1 - - -ZPRDPOSEO RI(iNT•DFWAY DEDICAT ION_LINF[ N- _ 0 0.47 ACRES PRO II T POStiO 20 FT __UTILTTY EASEMENT - evo ~ N Y I ego v>o C~7a nto - IN 0! 4L z w C7 40 O " O C 10 m rn AN, R1 I M A o Goo All cn z -4 -o . "'u ti ~ e H v V H I wr I Zz.~ d z .we z - { 3 ..-N Tn Z G3~ K I a c7> N I ao ~ y A ore 1 W ooe / coo •00 14~ 1 -'J1• 00 I ~~-10 VI I L I TY EASEMENT 0.00- S 40451'45' W r 413x76' _ 1 STRICKLAND JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Z DFNTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT VOI.. 535. PG. 558 D.R.D.C.T, , C ~Y1 1 h ATTACHMENT 3 D P&Z Minutes January B, 199 Agonda IVo..__ Page 14 C t A~Iontla Item. +L_. knock of ie °J b. Consider the preliminary plat of Lot It Food Lion T-2 Addition. Staff Report: Mr. Yost stated that the mite is 4.116 acres. The publin improvements being offered by the applicant include one off-site fire hydrant on Windsor, one on-site fire hydrant, approximately 410 teet of sidewalk along Locust Street, plat right he and a conforms la to from Locust onto Windsor. T the The Subdivision Development Review Committee recommends approval. De Petitioner: Robert Marshall stated that he is the engineer and surveyor for this property with the firm of Goodwin and Marshall at 6001 Bridge Street, Fort Worth. He is available to answer questions. Mr. Engelbrecht moved to recommend. approval of the preliminary plat of the Food Lion T-2 Addition, Lot; 1, Block 1. Motion was seconded by Ms. Huey and unanimously carried (6-0). r III. Hold it public hearing and consider the preliminary and final replats of Lots 15 -Nnd 16, Block 4 into Lots 15A and 16A, Block 4 of the Hill .de Addition. the replatin 200' of Nineeteen noticeswere returned in proerty owners Staff Report: Mr. Yost stated that this tract is being rezoned from Single Family to Two Family. The replat conforms to Chapter 34 of the Code of Ordinances. Mr. Holt asked if the curb cut would be on Bernard ::nd if the one on Fannin would be closed. b e closed. on Fannin. The Mr. Yost said the proposed curb cut on Bernard will cut will existing curb c Petitioner: John C. Johnson, 2905 Pensylvania Drive, stated that he Is the of the lots. The replat is ju housekeeping. Nothing has been done with the lots since 1947 In 1947 the lots were divided. People have lived on the lots and bought and sold them, but no one has ever tried to get a permit to do anything with them. The lots are 50' wide, the lo601 ts can e be lots. made into turning lots Current u 90 degrees, the for lots around that ti 1 ij ..It 11 111 TI.T111 CY COUNCII Y' 7 trill ITT 11 111. TTTT o~oQao Wood ~oo~oo QO~ A ,y A. d~ O Q O Z o~ o OF a0 O~~Oay r a ,v , t e * ~Ci'o F _ A r I. w S Y. 1 i ` JILLOOOIF Nsinda 11o Apaida Ito~m_f_ 111~s1 ORDINANCE 140. Data r-~' j ~ ` / AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING A COMPETITIVE SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the city has solicited, received and tabulated com- petitive sealed proposals for the purchase of necessary materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has reviewed and recommended that the herein described proposals are the best responsible proposals for the materials, equipment, supplies or services as shown in the "Proposals" submitted therefor; and WHEREAS, the City Council. has provided in the City Budget for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the ma- terials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted herein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the numbered items in t following numbered bids for materials, equipment, supplies, or st_ ices, shown in the "Proposals" on file in the office of the City's Purchasing Agent filed according to the number assigned thereto, are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids for such items: BID ITEM NUMBER No Y No? 1303 2 Andritz Ruthner $447,385.00 , 1308 1&2 Hudiburg Chevrolet $164,480.00 1313 1 Hudiburg Chevrolet $ 30,975.00 1313 2 Metro Ford $ 49,495.00 1316 All Turblex, Inc. $491,720.00 1322 All NovS:h Texas Nursery & Landscape $16 per tree SFt-CTION II. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted proposals, the City accepts the offer of the persons submitting the proposals for such items and agrees to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the terms, specifications, standards, quantities and for the specified sums contained in the Invitations, Proposals, and related documents. 5 Y. A ~.1 =a . .'y.1..iP VIA y~ 's Agenda No. _ n!~~ ,a• Agonda Iten~,_~~ - SECTION III. That should the City and persons subwitti a'~'e proved and accepted items and of the submitted proposals wish to enter into a formal written agreement as a result of the accep- tance, approval, and awarding of the proposal, the City Manager or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract which shall. be attached hereto; provided that the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions, spec- ifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained in " the Proposal and related documents herein approved and accepted. SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted proposals, the City Council hereby rf authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the approved proposal or pursuant to a written con- tract wade pursuant thereto as authorized herein. liECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective imme- diately upon its, nassaga and approval,. PASSED AND F.PPROVED this day of , 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: A APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: ~v ri fy S, {i l~ a i~ DATE: January 2i., 1992 CITY COUNCIL REPORT A{IendaNo. ltpenda Item._ QQ ry TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council tt~te FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1303 - PECAN CREEK WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT c PHASE I IMPROVEMENT EQUIPMENT PRESELECTION (ITEM 2) RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to Andritz Ruthner, Inc. in the amount of $447,385.00. SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of equipment with a long delivery time. These two belt filter presses are required as a portion of the Waste Water Treatment Plant 13 million gallon per day expansion. Delivery of this equipment is critical to the completion time of the facility and compliance with E.P.A. and T.W.C. regulations. There were two bids submitted which were lower prices but were evaluated by Alan Plummer and Associates as not conforming to specifications of the bid. BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet for Bid Item #2, PUB Meeting Minutes from January 15, 1.992. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Pecan Creek Waste Water Treatment Plan, Water/Wastewater Utility and Citizens of Denton. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this equipment will come from Capital Improvement Program Bonds. Respec fully submitted: A L'lo d Harrell City Manager. Approved by: Name: Denise Harpool Title: Senior Buyer DH/jh 228.DOC 4 i4 am f 1303 A ! I I I I I I I I I 1 f 1 I I I I I I Em We FWM CF>:fIC WMI PAFKCN I lomica I aan im I ~ I AM=- I SAFIIUM l NATPATW-kTc I cute IPmmnm, twl I SDO HARVEY E nMal Dc. I I Rm DIM a 1 I I I I I aPPY1 DATE NOYNO 17, 1991 ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I " I r181 Dt.-MOOCH I I I I I I I t. i rm t R.Cm 1 { ! P?1,5oo.oc 1 { I 2. 1 rM 2 BELT PMM 1 I *4?11000.00 1 I $483,929.90 1 $4,385.00 I I I I 1 I I 1 I 3. 1 rMi 3 I $184,900.00 1 I I I I $132,940.00 1 ! APBAM I F3oCJPTTQI I ! F9CEMCH I FYQ77PTECN I CrEmOH i 1 ! e I Yes I Yes I YES i TM I YES I YM I AtttMIK 112,3 Im YES YFS YES Im YM I I I I I I I Eln f 13031 an we PrA cam 1as1E1 A+vrm7v>P i ){oars I morn I soars I Km TnaUlm- I llC. I DOW 601 11 600 I 1~ 6a2 I 561I8R90ti I I RAHr AtA'.4i I I ! I ! ! fflmmo I 1 CCtN wE t1xmo 17, 1991 I I I I 1 c0w. I I I I I I I rm rccFMON I ! I I I~ I I 1. I rm I mw I I M,%4.00 E yt29,026.00 } $612,940.00 I►at tFS4sruB I I I ! I I I I (Dodo) I 2,1 nm 2 ax Px= 1 ~6' 9,000.00 1 I 1 1 1 I ~ UCL I I I I I I I w 3. I Zit 3 I I I I ! I I x AM= I E7~FY'racll I Exc>~nd1 I PXLt mm I 1 XtY nm I F70CFPTtON I I t 3 I I I I I I I I 1 tiUL I C/tz I YM { YES I YES I NO I I AR7F " 1,2,3 YES YES YFS YPS ctu I Q V V A y ~ f 's ii ~l v; 4851 FG2/03 JAM-1`•-"?' IdED 1510 IN IT`i' GF [iE1JT0H IIJA TEL N0:817-566-0120 Monda No. I` Age"da Itein_ Excer~t Rite Minutes of Public # tilities Board fl 5r/7 January 14, 1992 10. PRESSES FOR THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT 'HE pUpCHASE OF TWO BELT FILTER PLANT 13 MGD EXPANSION. Martin advised that four bids ware r ceived on this project. The lowest bid was $369,000 vs, the 59470,W bid t tat is being recommended by staff. The two low bids were not in confo mance with specifications. Staff is recommending the lowest bid conform ng to specifications, Andritz Ruthner, Inc. , in the amount of $447,385. Alan Plummer, Engineers on this project, reviewed with the Board the bid analysis and diseussod the variation between the bid specifications and the equipment bid by the low bidders v . the equipment bid in conformance to specification by Andrftz Ruthner, In After general discussion, Frady made a motion to recommend to the City Coun 85 asthevlowest r 1ua if ed bidder itSecond by Coplen~. AIn the ll ayes e o nays, $997,3 motion carried, c Ilk K ti 2? DATE: January 21, 1992 d CITY COUNCIL REPORT ABentla llom TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council 1 Odle FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager Gy/'7 SUBJECT: BID #1308 - TWO MAN AERIAL DEVICE D RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder Hud burg Chevrolet for the combination of item 1 and 2 + consisting of a Chevrolet Cab/Chassis and an Altec Aerial Device. The price is $82,240.00 each for two complete units, total bid award $164,480.00. SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of two (2) aerial devices v" or bucket trucks used by the Electric Distribution Division in maintenance kind new construction of the overhead distribution system. They will replace trucks purchased in 1978 ad 1979 with mileage of 89,000 and 90,000 and the last 5 year maintenance cost of $54,100.00 and $74,180.00 respectively. The old units will be sold at auction. BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR_W GROUPS AFFECTED: Fleet Services and Electric Distribntion. FISCAL IMPACT: These trucks will be funded from a combination of 1991-92 budget funds approved during the budget process and motorpool replacement funds. Budget $90,192.00 Motorpool $74L288.00 Total $1641180.00 Respe•.fully submitted: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Approved by: Name: Tom D, Shaw, C.P.M. / 'Pitlo: Purchasing Agent jDoc b 1 ~ r Bm 0 1308 f I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f I i I I I I I I I I I Wf, 2 WN AWL M= 1 DilW LCM= I KOMM 1 SU!= WUM I BEL UM f DAWNS I o"NSCIAL 1 um =a. E =mfi I Wm Fm 1 WJIL AY I I HWT. I aumm f Oc I m I PmEaw I eam o3w. I ! DVISTF t. ! SAID I DilkNAMIA1. I 1 I I I ! I I I I I I OM DATE 4AK1A1C 7, 1992 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I f rDH DEEMPrIa1 I I I I I I 1 I I r l i E ! I I I I I I I I I 1. I (2) CAhAFASW I i I ! f I I I 1 I 1 ! 32,000 ovw I NoS I 434,899.00 1 $33,.388.65 1 $30,91o.25 1 00,265.001 444,500.00 1 535,490.90 1 435,066.99 1 0,395.001 13+,714.00 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11W~ I I cm I cic I Fm I PPmew I MD I au E WrIL I From I DITIL I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I ! I f ! I I I I ! 1 I 1 2. 1 (2) 2 HAN AMU, DEaM I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I WUr11ST! BU 1 461,074.00 1 447,340.00 1 I 1 133,873.00 1 463,493.0 1 f $53,873.90 1 ! 1 ACE[" n MR= I 46o.00 I WC I I I I lino 1 0173.00 I I 1LC 1 I ~ I ADDEW 02 CIMM I I I I I I I I I 1 I I A. > +CY WV I SrAWAM I $1,647.00 f I I IwrD WLIC 0432 1 51,870.00E IMM U C $432 1 I I B. 11iDAam MUTES I WA I 41,682.00 1 I I I 42,229.00 f $1+,601.00 1 I $2,229.00 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I r I Km I Rl'im" I N= I I I f 4EF&LIFr I 19S1wA1W I I t~AIIIT I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I E I f I I I I I I I I I I 1 f I E I 1 I I E I tmzvm 1 210 DAYS f 125 DAM 1 90-120 DAYS 1 75 DAYS 1 90-115 DAYS I 120 DAYS 1 120-150 DW f 60-120 DAYS I 90-120 DAYS I 90.•120 DAYS I I I 1 I E I I 1 I f f I 5 o a p v `1 t 4 DATE: January 21, 1992 Agonda CITY COUNCIL REPORT No. _ " Q r Agondoltem TO* Mayor and Members of the City Council Dale FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1313 TRUCK CAB & CHASSIS " RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specifications: Item 1 28,000 lb GVW Truck Cab/Chassis with 5th wheel, Hudiburg Chevrolet at a cost of $30,975.00. Item 2 48,000 lb GVW Truck Cab/Chassis for knuckle boom, Metro Ford at a cost of $49,495.00. Total bid award $80,470.00 SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of two large truck cab/chassis. Item 1 replaces a 1964 model truck with over 156,000 miles and a last 5 year maintenance cost of $17,738.00. The new unit will be assigned to the Electric Distribution Division and will be used primarily to pull. a pole trailer and or a 40' flatbed trailer. Item 2 will replace 1985 model truck with 85,000 miles and a last 5 year maintenance cost of $22,768.00. The 1985 unit was originally the carrier for a digger body. A new digger truck and body was purchased in 1988, the old digger sold and the chassis placed under a new knuckle boom crane, Due to Insufficient frame strength on the old truck it is no longer economical to maintain or safe to operate. The new truck with extra heavy duty frame will go under the , existing knuckle boom. Hudiburg Chevrolet and Summit White GMC both offered lower prices for item 2 however, they failed to meet minimum specifications for front axle, front suspension, rear axle and frame section modules. + BACKGROUNDt Tabulation sheet, PROGRAMS DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Distribution Division and Fleet Services. FISCAL IMPACT: Both units will be funded from 1991-92 funds approved during the budget process and motorpool replacement funds. Budget $47,520.00 Motorpool L2L950.00 $80,470,00 c 1 L ~r. y.{e~a VH j~ CITY COUNCIL REPORT P JANUARY 21, 1992 Agenda No. PAGE GE 2 2 OF 2 q~(,.LZ► _/n Agenda Ilom_~ Respect ully submitted: + GG . Lloyd Harrell City Manager, Approved nby : Name: Toni D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent TS/jh 229.DOC 1YYi .'y F BID i 1313 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I ~ I BID NAPE Ma CAB CHASSIS I SilrruT MUTE I WrRO FORD I BrJllIllkM I BII1, Urfn I D& W I HUDIRM { K WAY I ac I SALE'S i INIF=TIONAL I WRD I PEImu-T I alEv f t EAWMTIOM I I TRUCS(S I 1 1 I MEN DATE JAR= 71 1992 I I I I I I I ~ I I I t t I I I n-Em Dkrm TICK I I I I I I ! I ~I i~ h I I I 1.~ 1-. ~t I t I t I ► I f I 1. I (1) TRUCK CABA NASUS I I I I I I I 1 I 28,000 GYW I $311102.65 1 $31,950.00 1 $33,851.00 1 1332,060.25 I N/B 1 330,975.00 1 $33,550.00 t I I I f I I I I E I ac I FOFD 1 IMIL E MRD I I M. I iff'L t I t { I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I 2. I (1) TR(x7t CAB/CNASW I I I I t I I I 48,000 CVW 1 $43,000.00 1 $19,495.00 1 $50,650.00 1 N/B 1 $60,681.00 1 $44,369.00 1 $49,911.00 I I MAKE G I FOR I tr'L I I I I tEMMILT I I C EV. t t aN'L i I I I 1 I t E I 1 1 I 1 I I i DUB= I 90-120 DAYS 1 115-60 DAYS 60-120 DAYS ( 75 DAYS 1 90-115 DAYS I 75-100 DAYS 1 90-120 DAYS t t i I ; I l 1 I I i I 1 i I 1 ,#,M I I t a- N ~ Y f0 0 3 ' 1 a o N v , DATE: January 21, 1992 Q CITY COUNCIL REPORT Agenda No. it Agenda ilom-` (l:le.~r~~' T0: Mayor and Members of the City council 17t1 FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1316 - BLOWER PECAN CREEK WASTE WATER TREATMENT RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to Turblex, Inc. in the total amount of $491,720.00. SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of equipment with an w expected long delivery time. These two single stage blowers are required as a portion of the Waste Water Treatment Plant 13 million gallon per day expansion. Delivery of these blowers is critical to the completion time of the facility and compliance with E.P.A. and TWC regulations. Other bids received were lower f.r in price but were evaluated by Alan Plummer and Associates as not being the most efficient or lowest bid. BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet, PUB Meeting Minutes 1-15-92. PROGRAMSL DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFEC,TE_D: Pecan Creek Waste Water Treatment rl.ant, Vlater./Waste Water Utility and Citizens of Denton. E..SCAL IMPACT: Funds for this equipment will come from Capital 7ripio`vr.ms~ntg Program Bands. Rospec filly submitted: L oyd V. Harre.1 City Manager Approved by: oi erne: Denise 4ar N itles Senior Buyer T DH/jh 226.DOC C r t. I 1! r ' I • "r 7 BID It 1316 ' I I I t I I 1 I BID NAME Bt,C ERS PECAN CRF-I( I JUMM INC. I DRESSER IND. I DRESSER W. I DRESSM M HASTE r ATER TRE:A'iNM I I Roars (1) 1 ROOTS (2) I ROUTS (3) I 1 1 92-151-600 i 92-151-601 1 92-•151-602 OPEN DATE JANUARY 81 1992 1 1 I 1 I qZy I ITEM DE9CRIP'ITCN I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 TOTAL BID PRICE I $11911720.00 1 +,3960425.00 1 027,700.00 1 $489>070.00 I I I 1 DESIGN LOAD: 100% I 356 1 389.7 1 371.4 1 362.6 1 I DESIGN LARD: 75% 1 262 1 303.2 1 285.9 1 275.6 1 DESIGN LOAD: 50% 180 ( 222.7 1 214.8 1 198.2 1 I E(CETTICNS RE WESTEn I NO I NO I NO I YES I BM YES 1 YES I YES I YES I I I I 4Qonda Nu. ~ _ Agonda Ilomnr Data- r2 7 rT A c., n tJ C, i f I` 1011da AA hflendd Itan)_ lltto . j- - Minutes of PublicrYt ~ January 1S1t 19921es 8oa,rd 9 CONSIDER 1311D OPENING #1318 LOWERS CIWERS CENTRIFUGAL AL BT< FOR THE PU$CHASE OF TWO SINGLE STAGE I=}CPANSION. FOR THE W4STEWATER TRETMMT PLANT 13 MGD Staff is recommendin' although they represent t'hebhighest nliials c the lowest responsive bidder, ($491,720), Laney questioned the legality Of the id, Martin advised that bid evaluation was based nr the bid amount and the w ighted guaranteedmpotiower coftonhe other The we!ghted average guaranteed ma um power consupn sumption. Turblex blowpi. Is 2e5 KW. Evaluated at $7,5oo r KW, this power consumption results in an evaluated life cynic, coat differs e blower bids submitted . The cost Jiff rentof $97 500 ialw~ou dtbe recovered inttlhree to four Years. All bidders submitted heir bids with full knowledge evaluation criteria; this criteria was ublished within the bid specifcs i of th nse Coplen indicated that during staff view of bids, the break even analysis should be considered for shorten pe ocls to match the current teohnological unknowns ns In br ak evenaa alysistas aodeci i nma nto dolitions. Staff needs to utilize a Iloardd Acdon; Laney made a motion to recommend to the City Council they accept the bid of , Turblex, Inc,, of Springfield, Mo. ,fin the amount of ;491, 720. Secord by Frady. All ayes, no nays, motion ca ed. i, v v. f 1 DATE: January 21, 1992 CITY COUNCIL REPORT Agenda TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council AgonUalIltom_//- FROM: Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1322 - TREES-CONTAINER GROWN ~yryJ+ RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder meeting specification, North Texas Nursery and Landscape in the amount of $32,000.00. SUMMARY: This bid is to purchase container grown trees for the Tree Power Program. The lowest bid by Green Fiddler did not meet our minimum specification of 5' which made North Texas Nursery and Landscape the lowest bidder. There is also an option in this bid to purchase 2000 additional trees if required by the city for this program. The purpose of the program is to reduce summer electric bills, improve air duality and privacy. Funds for this program were approved by Council in 1991-92 Budget. BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet, Memorandum from Richard Foster January 9, 19920 PUB Minutes. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Utility Division, Citizens of Denton. FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted funds for 1991-92 account #610-080-•0257-6983. Respect lly submltted: Lloy , 'Harrell _ City Manager ~ApQprrov~ed : Names Denise Harpo 1 Title: Sanior Buyer DH/jh 225.DOC i, BID A 1322 I I I I I ~ I I I I BID NAM, TREES - CONTAINER GROWN I MEADOR NORTH TEXAS I OREEN I NOLES l A-1 I I I NURSERY I FIDDLER ENTERPRISES i INDUSTRIAL I 1 I I I I OPEN DATE JANUARY 91 1992 i I ( I I I --I I. I _ -I~.~ -I I ITEM DESCRIPTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2000 TREES I $19.50 1 $16.00 1 $14.00 i $22,00 ; $50.00 { I I 1 I I I I I I .I co 7 n 1 n l Q 0 Q 1 C~ S r. _ tt a P()erJa No, .2 ,r AI)onda Itom_ A,,,,,- Date ..177 CITY of DFNTON,t TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, T MS 20 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent FROM: Richard Foster, Public Information Coordinator/Utilities DATE: January 9, 1992 SUB.JECI': TREF. POWBR BID 01322 " The low bid which met our specifications was submitted by North Texas Nursery f, Landscape, 1200 E. University, Denton, Texas 76201, The bid was $1.6 per tree, I recommend that the contract be awarded to this bidder, This item will be considered by the Public Utilities Board at their January 15th meeting. Pending their recommendation, I would like to have this contract placed on this City Council agenda for January 21. Please advise if you need additional information. Minutes of the PUB meeting will be supplied as back-up for the Council agenda. Thank you for all your help, is ar Foster RF/sc IDS/010992003 cc: Bob Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 ;w F, n M I DENTON UR TEL P10+ 81 Sb6••8120 14351 F03~iJ3 kend.+ 7'/1e A Exce pt Agonda Minutes of Public tllities Boatel" / January I , 1992 77 f 7 I1. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF BID ,#132 IN THE AMOUNT OF $16 PER TREE TO NORTH TEXAS NURSERY & LANDS APE FOR AWARD OF A "TREE POWER" PROGRAM CONTRACT. Nelson introcluced this item explaini g that the pttrpose of the "Tree Power" program Is two-fold. One, to improv air quality, and two, to reduce energy ' consumption in the homes. The p grant calls for a five distributing 8000 trees per year ro trees with she Option of an additio 1 20001 ends received a firm bid of d of North Texat Nursery and Landscape of $16 per tt ecommends the tow bid of The staff has taken the Board's advic available from the original ton propos and The Ve, The the list lowest ofbidspecies v trees not meet specifications. Staff'is looks received did is in the pro~lese of outliin g' at this first year as a pilot ro and placement while, at the ameltimet trying to antidasome flexibility In the program, p garding dlat"ibution At the end oJ' !,,he pilot project, if tL% s remain, the Utility can claim these at 75% of their original cost, plus the tfti t out to June, y has an option to extend the program Laney asked how customer selection, will be mide for receiving the trees. Foster advised that he is working wt h Data processing on various selection methods, and so far, staff has deter Ined that no businesses, apartments or mobile home ,tita will be eble fort a program, It would be self-defeating not to make sure the trees went to p imarily single family homes and duplex itij Ins ar as lowerin Isnstill Intfhe plan ing stagest.~ eost~ are concerned. Program management Lanoy made a motion to recommend to tote City Couil bid of $16 por tree from North Texa4 Nursery and that the lowest ceptJed, , Second by Frady. All eyes and Landscape be accepted. na nays 'motion c+arrIed. i I A i r x l ~j S's r CITY COUNCIL W A w ooooaoaao p coo L7 ~ F 0 j O 1 r. y E Agenda U0 - AU- -4 ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. OF TUSOF FOR FUNDS PUBLIC EXPENDITURE WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated com- petitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager nr ? designated employee has receiv- ed and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowt responsible bids for the construction of the public im- provements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and plans and specifications therein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the following competitive bids for the con- struction of, public works or improvements, as described in f at onsthe file Invitations'", "Bid Proposals" or plans in the Office of the City's Purchasing Agent filed according as bee bid number assigned hereto, are hereby accepted and approved - inq the lowest responsible bids: CONTRACTOR AMOUNT LID NUMBER 1321 SOUTHWEST INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTORS, INC. $24,203.00 SECTION N ?I• That the acceptance and approval of the above and th public for construction eofesuchh the person dsubmitting the constitute and the g roved, until such parks or improvements withe allnreqaccepted uirementsnspecified in the Notice person shall comply omply to Bidders including and payment bonds, aftertnotificationaof furnishing of performance the award of the bid. SECTIION III. That, the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all necessary written contracts for the performance of the construction of the public works or improvementstin accordance with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and Bid Propos- als, and documents relating thereto specifying the terms, c• y ra _ r c r t t Agenda Ilom ._...a 57 tions, plans and specifications, standards, quantities and pe7- fied sums contained therein. SECTION IV. That upon acceptance and approval of the above competit.iva bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and ir,provements as authorized herein, the City Council here- by authorizes the expenditure of funds J.n the manner and in the amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized contracts executed pursuant thereto. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective im- mediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of __,,1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, NAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY., APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: 4y t. Ih fi{ R f N. DATE: January 21, 1992 entla No. CITY COUNCIL REPORT Agontla llonl 1 1 Rata 17 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM, Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1321 - CONCRETE FOUNDATION FOR ARCO • SUBSTATION RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder Southwest Industrial Constructors, Inc. in the amount of $24,203.00. r SUMMARY: This bid is for all labor and materials to construct a cone:.eta foundation for the Arco Substation. Southwest Industrial Constructors was the lowest of six bidders. BACKGNOUND: Tabulation Sheet, PUB Meeting Minutes January 15, 1992. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Substation, Electric Utility and Citizens of Denton. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this project will come from Electric Bond Funds Account #612-080-RB90-F000-9217. Respec ully submitted: l\ C/ I~ _ Ll yd V. Harro.l.l City Manager A Approved by: Name: Denise Harpool Title: Senior Buyer DH/jt 227.DOC DID a 1321 ! I I I I ! I I I I 1 1 I ! I I I I I I BID NAAS ARCO MUREM I FORT DAU TON I E.L. DALTON cRArO ! MMR-Wr I MXAM I FLOYD XNN I F011NTATION I f !CONSTRUCTION I INDU,SMAL I CONSrRUCL'LON I L1Tfi I I I I raVSTRUCTORS I I I OPEV DATE JANUARY 14, 1992 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ITEM DFMRIMON I I I i I I I I f i f I I 1. I a>NCR>rE FUMATION f $516.29 I $547.05 I $272.00 I $2.64.80 I $298.00 I $395.00 I I UNIT PRICE (CY) I I f I I ! I I 1 I E f 1 I I ! I I I I I 2. I MAL I $470189.00 1 4660,000.37 I $,74,860,80 1 $24,203.00 I $27,216.00 E $36,103,00 1 f I I I I I I I f ACIQML=r, ADDRZA I YFS - I YFS I YEs I YES I I I I I I I I I ! f I I I I I f 1, l s N pN F~ T N 4 Q i h ;Yp't ki i' JAII-1 -'9~ WED iSr7y ID! ITY OF DENTON Up TEL N0.817-556-81210 tt3S~ P<71~171 Aganda N0. Aganda Ilorn~ Excerpt Qile I.L-.? Minutes of Public Utilities Board January Ib, 1992 Q D 13. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF LOW BID ki ETING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE EQUIP) ENT FOUNDATIONS FOR THE ARCO ' SUBSTATION, BID #1321. Harder reviewed this item recommending the low bid of six bidders, Southwest Industrial from D3nton, in the amo nt of $24,203 ($284.80/Cu,Yd). be accepted. Frady made a motion to rec mmend to the City Council that they accept the low bid of Southwest Indus rial in the amount of $24,203. Second by Laney, All ayes, no nays, motion c Mon. A C I ti ~j CITY COUNCII 00oo°oa40a00hopopp 0~~: ,v r ppp _ 00 ~ o q x C d Q ' Q ti. Oppnro ~ ^O °00ooc000coo~°°°~ q1 y f AOonda No. AV --e Aponda Ilotn~~^~ Iktl6 __1_:.~L 5 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR EPIERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN A000RD- A14CE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE + DATE. WHEREAS, state law and ordinance require that certain contracts requiring an expenditure or payment by the City in an amount- ex- ceeding $10,000 be by competitive bids, except in the case of pub- lic calamity where it becomes necessary to act at once to appro- priate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to pre- serve the property of the city, or it is necessary to protect the public health of the citizens of the city, or in case of unforeseen damage to public property, machinery or equipment,, NOW, 'T'HEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the City Council hereby determines that there is a public calamity that makes it necessary to act at once to ap- propriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to preserve the property of the city, or to protect the public health of the citizens of the city, or to provide for unforseen damage to public property, machinery or equipment, and by reason thereof, the following emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services, as described in the "Purchase Orders" attached hereto, are hereby approved: PURCHASE ORDER 14UMBER VENDOR AMOUNT PO #21468 1 & S FQUIPMENT $10,395.03 SEC4`ION II. That because of such emergency, the City Aianager or designated employee is hereby authorized to purchase the mater- ials, equipment, supplies or services as described in the attacheu purchase Orders and to make payment therefore in the amounts there- in stated, such emergency purchases being in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases by the City from the requirements of competitive bids. t ti 4 S Agenda No. ~ Agenda Item Dite _ SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become eff ctivAim- mediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1991. - -1 6 BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCII, CITY ATTORNEY BY: A c 1C_ r. } I 4 ' DATE: January 21, 1992 CITY COUNCIL REPORT Agenda Plo. Agenda Item %p!,~'' _ TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Dme_1__ FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #21468 - J & S EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATION: We recommend Purchase Order #21468 to J & S ! Equipment in the amount of $10,395.03 be approved. SUMMARY: This purchase order is for the emergency repairs to a piece of equipment critical to the proper operation of the Waste Water Treatment Plant. The machine is used to plow sludge into the ground as a portion of the sludge disposal program. The unit is a Big A Sludge Tractor purchased in 1979 at a cost of $49,777.00. Estimated replacement cost is approximately $85,000.00. It is one of two similar units in our fleet. BACKGROUND: Purchase order #21468, Memorandum from Jack Jarvis, Superintendent of Fleet Services. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Fleet services Divisions and Waste Water Division. FISCAL IMPACT: 1991--92 budget funds for equipment maintenance 620-082-0470-8342. Respec ully submitted: to d V. Harrell City Manager Approved by: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent TS/jh 222.DOC t k s r . t..~, 11 F e ,-•frry c , !t !3 1 THIS IS A W I Y Of LtIV I UN, f kAAS CONFIRMING ORDER ! (IF MARKED) t x : PURCHASE ORDER NO: This number must appear on all F<: 2!41618 DO NOT DUPLICATE Invoices, delivery slips, cases, / \ Ons„ boxes, packing slips and bills. --Raq No: fill 0 i. Bid No: L/,\ Dater c. l Page No. i VENDOR PURCHASING DIVISION /901.u TEXAS STREET I DENTON, TEXAS 76201 IJAME/ J030 c: :U L 1 `r•i"l l' t' 1 ; i r „ 8171383-7100 011`N' S1ETRO8111267 0042 FAX 8 1 71782 4692 ADDRESS ~j = Y: 1 I.;)L. U P •11<K,v n'f DELIVERY I:I I I' 1 , :!.kI 1(:14 f, 1. Y ; ADDRESS ! t.. c I V I ti ..;vTGfll I:: VENDOR Na DELIVERY QUOTED, JJ.):,2 'i 1 FOB UcbTINATI TERMS k a1F~ ifnML= c Clll' r! y?yIH it * IG R7 67 c :Mt1Y::. G C%,-PAIL !:I1-;Ifs, 1PIh 1!•.ttiN`: v v G ` ~1 OACLWTAL 7t -,iF) lti. 4Pr1: !:.I1- 1.1 ijl VLPIDOR INSLRl1CTI0NS 3 Terms - Net 40IUn' s olhul i,c specil'ed - I. t ori wnlits PiUidirplicale eal>y. I ',hippm9lrnlru<tions f.O LI $dl to Acc . 80 . L7cslin~!ion piiapaidto~Isson>rn~re:~ sn~~n~rrnr j ` j r - Acceu I uyab.e b No ledar l a • '11(h 3~11l.s h X ,half ho twkldul f } 215 C-. McKinney 91. m pricos billed rrarknrlx 769()f PurrlinsV~iSlDrvr,inn C k D Nonda No Agenda item__ y Jr I CITY of DENTCN, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY t N, XAS 7620! M E N o R A N D U M A TO: Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent PROM: Jack Jarvis, Fleet Superintendent DATE: December 10, 1991 SUBJECT: EMERGENCY REPAIR OF UNIT 7067 BIG A SLUDGE APPLICATOR PURCHASE ORDER NO. 21468 ISSUED TO is EQUPMENT SERVICE INC. Purchase order no. 21468 was issued to 3S Equipment icrvice, Inc, for an emergency engine repair on December 5, 1991. This purchase order was expedited due to the emergency of the situation. The Big A is critical to the operation of the Water Reclamation Plant. It's 11 abacklogsmakingvitadifficCltbtoekeepttherplante opplant. erating Down the time could cause capacity. necessary Our cost for this repair was $10,395.03, The funding for this repair is budgeted in Water Reclamation account number 620-082-0470-8342. rte' Jack Jarvis c 8171566.8200 DIPW METRO 434.2529 r t t CITY COUNCIL M #f# #tff Y f' H4+ + oooo~ppp09990 e H O~~O ddd `A, 0 1. o O O~ 0~~~~~CCQGGCpppp~o ~ u Y. r` 3 r r A08nda No. A©ontlallom,_Q~f¢L/ ORDINANCE NO. fate _L / AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR PURCHASES OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WHICH ARE AVAILABLE FROM ONLY ONE SOURCE IN ACCORDANCE, WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PUR- CHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING AN EF- FECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 252.022 of the Local Government Code provides that procurement of items that are only available from one source, including: items that are only available from one source because of patents, copyrights, secret processes or natural monopolies; films, manuscripts or books; electricity, gas, water and other utility purchases; captive replacement parts or components for equipment; and library materials for a public library that are available only from the persons holding exclusive distribution rights to the ma- terials; need not be submitted to competitive bids; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to procure one or more of the items mentioned in the above paragraph; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the following purchases of materials, equip- ment or supplies, as described in the "Purchase orders" attached hereto, are hereby approved: PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT POP 21938 TRAFFIC GNGINCP;RING & CONTROLS INC. $.54,1.56.00 SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above items shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the quotation for such items until such person shall comply with all requirements specified by the Purchasing Department. ~.CTT,ON III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any contracts relating to the items specified in Section I and the expenditure of funds pursuant to said contracts is hereby authorized. C s' r. ti /F 2 A, ~i Agenda No. Agnda Ilem_[Le2_6!1 ORDINANCE NO. Oaia Y AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR PURCHASES OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WHICH ARE AVAILABLE FROM ONLY ONE SOURCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PIJR- CHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING AN EF- FECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 252.022 of the Local Government Code provides that procurement of items that are only available from one source, including: items that are only available from one source because of patents, copyrights, secret processes or natural monopolies; films, mantiscripts or books; electricity, gas, water and other utility purchases; captive replacement parts or components for equipment; and library materials for a public library that are available only from the persons holding exclusive distribution rights to the ma- terials; need not be submitted to competitive bids; and WHEREAS, the City council wishes to procure one or more of the items mentioned in the above paragraph; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the i•ollowing purchases of materials, equip- ment or supplies, as described in the "Purchase orders" attached hereto, arP hereby approred: PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT PO# 21938 TRA171 C L'NGINF.BRING & CONTROLS INC. $54,:56.00 SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above items shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the quotation for such items until such person shall comply with all requirr..ments specified by the Purchasing Department. SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any contracts relating to the items specified in Section I and the expenditure of funds pursuant to said contracts is hereby authorized. 4 t x y ~i =le 3 V Y Agenda No. Agenda Ilam__4Q6 wto _ /dJ~ to SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective'imm~di- ately upon its passage and approval, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992 BOS CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST; JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY; APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM; DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY; DATE: January 21, 1992 Agenda No. _ 02'OD0S CITY COUNCIL REPORT ADoridaltem Rite _ L~J'4 1~ TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council 6 FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #21938 - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND CONTROLS INC. 0 RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this purchase order in the amount of $54,156.00 to TEC be approved. SUMMARY: This sole source purchase order is for 6 pieces of model 1880 EL Closed Looped Traffic Controls at $5,798.00 each and 3 model 1880 EL Closed Loop Traffic Controls at $6,456.00 each. The prices vary depending upon programming and optional items. The controller will he located at: 1. US377/Carroll at Collins/77 2. Nottingham at US 380 3. McKinney at Mockingbird 4. Lindsey at US377 5. US377 at Acme St. 617 Teasley Lane at 135E 8. 135E at Ave D 9. Shop spare for Emergency Backup These controllers are single source and exempt from the bid process due to software programming and patent rights as defined by S'-,ate Law. TEC is the only distributor for Transyt bri-:,d Controllers. No other controller is compatible with the City of Denton Closed Loop System. BACKGROUND: Purchase order #21938 Traffic Engineering Controls, Quote from TEC dated 1-5-92. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Traffic Control Division and Citizens of Denton. FISCAL IMPACT: These controllers will be funded from several sources. 5 from Street Bonds Funds 1 reimbursed by developer (Lindsey at 377) 3 from a combination of 1991-92 budget funds C d ` t t I r~ CITY COUNCIL REPORT Apenda'0- ' JANUARY 21, 1992 AQendallem PACE 2 OF 2 Due 4 Respec 'ully submitted: 1 d V. Harrell" City Manager Approved by: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent TS/jh 221.DOC 4 t 1 901-8 TEXAS STREET PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TX 76201 P. O. NUMBER DATEIVENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYI 21938 01/14/92 C15 TRA47701 % VENDOR SHIPTO; TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 6301 N. MERIDIAN-SUITE 100 A0811daNo,_QPZ Apenda llem_ OKLAHOMA CITY* OK 73 halo rr f ITEM ACCOUNTNUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO, LINEAMOUN 01 441 020 STRT 8127 9150 TRANSYT 8 PHASE CONTROLLER 02 441 020 STRT 8727 9150 AND CABINET 03 441 020 STRT 8727 9150 0.01 US 377/CARROLL AT COLLINS/77 5679840 04 100 020 0012 8336 0.01 SWOP SPARE EMERGERCIES 5079800 05 443 020 STRT 9101 9105 0.01 NOTTINGHAM AT US 380 5*79800 06 100 020 0012 8502 MCKINNEY AT MOCKINGBIRD '3,798.0 07 225 006 0050 9101 SAME AS ABOVE 2*00060 08 100 020 0012 8502 0v01 LINDSEY AT HWY 377 50798.0 09 410 020 HWOP 0001 9150 TRANSYT 8 PHASE CONTROLLER 10 410 020 HWDP 0001 9150 CCNTROLL.ER AND CABINET 11 410 020 HWDP 0001 9150 0.02 TEASLEY LN a135E DIAMOND 129912.0 12 410 020 HWDP 0001 9150 0,01 135E AT AVE D INTERCHARGE 60456.0 13 410 020 HWDP 0001 9150 CONTROLLER 14 410 020 HWDP 0001 9150 0.01 US 377 AT ACME ST• 5r798*0 TOTAL FCR P.Oe 54* 156 .01 The C11y of Denton, Texas Is I" exempt-House Blll N0.20. Reference P.O. Number on all BIL, Shipments and Invoices. Shipments are 1=. 0. S. City of Denton, ores Indicated. By Send Invoices T0; Direct Inquldes TOt Clty of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C. P. M, Purchasing Agent 216 E, MaKlnney St., Denton, TX 76201 Tom 0. Shaw, C. P. M. Asst, Purchasing Agent (or as Indleated on Purchase Order) 8171666-C311 DIFW Metro 267-0042 C The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer c, b, M1 r: tl ii r !1, O1~?ti1 2 1`.•1$3 FROM TRAF E110 & CONTROLS TO 191739 4652 P,01 C I TRAFFIC ENGINEERING & CONTROL-S4 No. p,o. Box 7293 Agonda Item-W5 Hu14TSVIL1-E, TX 773427993 409/291-3110 FAx409/2815-2262 Date r7 DATE y of Dento:l 01/05/9, To i Traffic Transportation Dept. , Attn: Jerry Clark sues c.r Special Quota FAX. 3,i7-iQ2-4692 attention: Ma. Denise HearPool Purchasing p (6)1880EL Closed Loop 8 phase oomplete w16:1U0plua°ables and '12yL onitor LCD at original oontraot price of >,x x LA"T PURCHASE at this 1' 1}'~'' ?f 1f Yn' Y. N l H'.t',i M1~f rT I` t3) 188CI-L Closed Loop 8 Phase (Diamond) complete as above . $64.6-000%. Thi. quote is at special pricing and the factory his informed us that will be a cost be issued for the next '12 to ~4 months. This new quote will be issued later this wee)., Abovo quotation Good for 30 Days ox, 02/05/92 41 Nevin A 'i>rne 800-395 8723 ~uw ~sii Fr ora :u :AF[- EM .,,..•.w•.c w, anerA Odra. roc?: T52Fa~~28 TOTAL P,01 t I CITY IILLU COUNCII a 000000oooooaoooogoDOa o. o0 4 ` t p e O o~oooOVV ~ t ~ OoODo V4~COGG~00 11 H- - - - - - - - - - - - - - k t . .j s Agonda No, ORDINANCE NO. Agenda I1em-;Z5 Wok" AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT H~o" BONE ENGINEERS,INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES RELATING TO EARTH ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY SURVEY AT THE DENTON SANITARY LANDFILL; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING THE EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the Mayor is authorized 'co execute an agreement between the City of Denton and Rone Engineers Inc. of Dallas for Professional Engineering Services relating to the Earth Electrical Resistivity Survey at the Denton Sanitary Landfill, under the terms and conditions contained in said agreement, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION II. That the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and amount as specified in the agreement. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992• BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCHO CITY ATTORNEY BY: 1256.DOC ti c 4 n rl i DATE: January 21, 1992 CITY COUNCIL REPORT Aoenda No. _ - M - AQenda/l:om ie - TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Me"1- 12, FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager r SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #21937 - ROME ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATION: We recommend purchase order #21937 to Rona Engineers be approved in the amount of $12,540.00 F. SUMMARY: This purchase order is for the performance of an annual Earth Electrical Resistivity Survey (FEES) at the City of Denton Landfill. This test is required by the Texas Department of Health. The purpose is to identify and locate the possible existence of leachate migration at the Denton Sanitary Landfill. Rona Engineers has performed similar studies for other area landfills as well as the City of Denton in the past. The performance of this study by Rona Engineers is a professional service and exempt from the bidding process as defined by the laws of the State of Texas. BACKGROUND: Purchase Order #21937, Contract from Rona Engineers, Letter of Qualification from Rona Engineers. PROGRAMS Landfill, DEPARTMENT UR GROUPS AFFECTED: City of Denton Sanitary l, Solid Waste Division Denton Municipal Utilities, FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this (FEES) study will come from 1991-92 budget funds account # 630-024-0803-8502 Special Services. Respe ullly`submitted: / Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Approved: l~ Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P,M. Title: Purchasing Agent TS/jh \ 220,DCC Cv r t a Yr THIS Is a 41;11 1 or L)WV1UN, 1EXAS - CONFIRMING ORDER XX PURCHASE ORDER N0; PC 21937 (IF MARKED) This number must appear on all DO NOT DUPLICATE Invoices, delivery slips, cases, tins., boxer, packing slips and bills, Req No: Bid Na: Dote: 01 14 92 Page No. 91 VENDOR PURCHASING DIVISION 1901.8 TEXAS STR£E T / OENTON, TEXAS 76201 NAME/ RCNE ENGINEERS 8171383-7100 OIFWMETRO8111267.0042 FAX8171382-4692 ADDRESS 11234 GOODNIGHT LANE DELIVERY CONFIRMATION ONLY C23 ADDRESS SOLID WASTE - LANDFILL DALLAS. TX 75229 901 A TEXAS ST OENTOi X 76201 4 VENDOR NO. RON49000 DELIVERY QUOTED 01 25 92 FOB DESTINATION TERMS Ol 1e000 EA VENDOR CAT* A N / A MFG NAME 26540*N00 12654061 CITY 0 90629 ANNUAL RESISTIVITY SURVEY ary ti N A r 4 PAGE TOTAL 126540:0`. GRAND TOTAL ! 126540 01 630 024 0803 8502 126540000 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS: 3. Terms - Net 30 (unless oiherwlso specited i I. Serif originnl invotco with duplicate copy. 4. Shipping Inslrucllons: F.O.B. Deslinalion groped Nn!ess OLMMiSe speciliodi 2. SIT to Accounts Payable G. No federal or slate sales lax shall be Included 215 E. MaKlnney St, In prices billed. - Oenlon, TX 76201 Purchasing Division a j i H M J Rone Englneers, Inc, Metro 214/263-1555 31234 Goodnight Lane Tel. 214!241243.451 .4537 RoneEngineers Gallas, Texas 75229 Fax. 235174 r UaffesfFor3 Worlh/Hou hJHouston 800!243.8494.6494 December 31, 1991 City rt Denton p~ ~4D2 _ Department of Public Works hlenda No. 215 E, McKinney Street Agenda Item__ 4 E Denton, Texas 76201 ~Qo ATTN: Mr. Charles Watkins 1111a - -.9 l RE: QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE ELECTRICAL EARTH RESISTIVITY SURVEY CITY OF DENTON SANITARY LANDFILL DENTON, TEXAS Dear Mr. Watkins The purpose of this letter is to Identify Pone Englneers, int.'s experience In performing, Interpreting, and analyzing electrical earth reslstlvity surveys (EERS) with relationship to landfills, The writer and Rona Engineers, Inc. have been performing EERS programs since 1982, We were the forerunners of coordination of EERS programs with Texas Department of Health Division of Solid Waste Management personnel, who at that time consisted predominantly In the review process of Mr. Bill Price and Mr. Chat Safe. Pone Engineers, Inc, has performed reslstlvity surveys at landfills operated by the City of Weatherford In Weatherford, Texas, Camelot Landfill for the City of Farmers Branch in Hebron, Texas, and for the City of Denton at the Denton Sanitary Landfill. Pone Engineers, Inc, has performed six surveys at the Denton Landfill since 1986 and our EERS reports have been accepted by the Health Department In all cases, We own, operate, and manage our own EERS equipment which consists of a Bison Model 2350 electrical earth reslstlvity meter with associated ancillary, equipment. This equipment Is that recommended by the , Texas Department of Health and has been utfllzed for the last ten years for resistivity studies. Pone Englneers, Inc, Is uniquely quallffed to perform the EERS program at the Denton Landfill due to our experience with prcvious slmllar studies and particularly our experience and knowledge at the specific Denton Landfill site. We would be pleased to further discuss any dotalfs of our experience and knowledge at doing this work at your convenience. Thank you for consfdaring Pone Engineers, inc. to perform these studies. Please contact us should questions arise on fnformation contained heroln. Very truly yours, Charlos M. Jacks , P.E. Vice President CMJ/ksf C c" Geolechnicai Consultants QoosciortcoslEnvironnlonlal Construction Materials Testing :i s V E" Rone Engineers, Inc. ' 11234 Goodnight Lane Metro 2Dallas, Texas 75229 ref' 214/241.4517-1555 Fax RrS Dallas/Fort WorrhlHouslon . 2141241 .5174 800/243.8494 February 18, 1991 - Proposal 12.18-GD Clly of Denton Department of Public Works 215 East McKinney ~jDenton, Texas 76201 Agenda No. Attn: Mr. Charles S, Watkins Agenda Ilan) fklle PROPOSAL FOR SFRVICCS ' EARTH ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY SURVEY 77 DENTON SANITARY LANDFILL DENTON, TEXAS Gentlemen: GENERAL Rone Engineers, Ina !s pleased to Submit the following proposal to conduct the annual earth electrical resistivity survey (EERS) as required by the Texas Department of Health, PURPOSES AND SCOPE OF STUDY The purposes of this earth electrical resistivity survey are to Identify and locate the possible existence of leachate migration at the Denton Sanflary Landfill and to provide Information for comparison with previous and future surveys. To accomplish the intended purposes, the study shall include the following: k Conduct a field resistivity survey utilizing both sounding and prolffing techniques, Reduce and analyze ffoid data by direct plot, Barnes' Layer Method, Moore's Cumulative Method, and Apparent Resistivity. " lnlerpret the data based on comparison with prevlousfy conducted baseline resistivity surveys t and geotechnical Information. ' Prepare a report including all above iterns and submit three (3) copleS to the City of Denton. Geolechnlcal Consultants GeoSClancasll:nvIronmenlal . Consirucllon Malerrais Testing x lcf I{i 1. 7s r; i. ii if .T City of Denton Department of Public Works Proposal 12.18•GD Agenda No. February 18, 1991 Agenda Item___~ Page 2 Dtla FIELD INVESTIGATION DA General Apparent resistivity data will be obtained In the field utilizing a Bison Model 2350 Earth Resistivity Meter, Electrode arrangement will use the Wenner or Price Array of four probes at equal spacing centered over o the specific survey point. Evaluation will be made using both sounding and profiling techniques. Profiling measures lateral changes In the apparent resistivity. The electrode separation remains constant, while the entire electrode configuration Is moved from station to station. The A•spacing used in the profile surveys for this Investigation will be 18 and 36 feet for all profiling stations. Sounding measures the apparent resistivity change with depth. Again using the Wenner or Price Array, the A•spacing Is increased from a center point at a set interval. As the electrode spacing is Increased, the depth of penetration Increases, At each sounding location, an Initial A•spacfng of three feet will be used. This spacing then will increase in three-foot Increments, The apparent resistivity will be measured at each successive interval to a final spacing of 36 feet. Field procedures will be performed In general accordance with Texas Department of Health, Division of Solid Waste Management "Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Earth Electrical Resistivity Surveys" Technical Guide, updated May, 1985 and the October 23, 1991 letter from TDH to the City of Denton, ENGINEERING SERVICES The engineering report will present the results of the field and laboratory data together with our analyses of the results and recommendations, We will provide three copies of the report. The report will addrossi (1) general soil and groundwater conditlons; (2) comparison of previous profile survey results to the results of the current survey; A (3) generation of several baseline sounding results around the perimeter of the landfill; and (4) analysis and Interpretation of all data derived from the survey. Items other than those specified above, which are revealed by these studies or are necessitated by a change In project scope, may require revised field and engineering services, These services will be discussed and negotiated on an individual basis. ANTICIPATED COSTS FOR SERVICES AND SCHEDULE Servlcos will be performed In accordance with the attached schedule of fees. Based on the anticipated quantity of work and the attached schedule, the total cost of this Investigation should be on the order of $11,000,00 to $13,000.00. For budget purposes, a maximum cost of $13,000.00 Is recommended, This cost will riot be exceeded without prior authorization. t Rona y I .~I „ i i City of Denton Department of Public Works Proposal 12.18-GD.nj~ ti February 18, 1991 A{lenda No. February 2 Agonda/ f_le~m/__a4 E Win FIELD INVESTIGATION Z2A General I y Apparent resistivity data will be obtained In the field utilizing a Olson Model 2350 Earth Resistivity Meter. Electrode arrangement will use the Wenner or Price Array of four probes at equal spacing centered over the specific survey point. Evaluation will be made using both sounding and profiling techniques. a Profiling measures lateral changes in the apparent resistivity, The electrode separation remains constant, while the entire electrode configuration is moved from station to station. The A-spacing used In the profile surveys for this fnvomfgatlon will be 18 and 36 feet for all profiling slatlons. Sounding measures the apparent resistivity change with depth. Again using the Wenner or Price Array, the A-spacing Is Increased from a center point at a set Interval, As the electrode spacing Is Increased, the depth of penetration Increases. At each sounding location, an Initial A-spacing of three feet will be used. This spacing then will Increase In three-foot Increments. The apparent resistivity will be measured at each successive interval to a final spacing of 36 feet. Field procedures will be performed in general accordance with Texas Department of Health, DIvlslon of Solid Waste Management "Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Earth Electrical Resistivity Surveys" Technical Guide, updated May, 1985 and the October 23, 1991 letter from TDH to the City of Denton, ENGINEERING SERVICES The engineering report will present the results of the fleld and laboratory data together with our analyses of the results and recommendations. We will provide three copies of the report. The report will address; (1) general soil and groundwater conditions; (2) comparison of previous profile survey results to the results of the current survey; (3) generation of several baseline sounding results around tho perimeter of the landfill; and (4) analysis and Interpretation of all data derived from the survey. Items other than those specified above, which are revealed by these studies or are necessitated by a change In project scope, may require revised field and engineering services. These services will be discussed and negotiated on an Individual basis. ANTICIPATED COSTS FOR SERVICES AND SCHEDULE Services will be performed in accordance with the attached schedule of fees. Based on the anticipated quantity of work and the attached schedule, the total cost of this Investigation should be on the order of $11,000.00 to $13,000.00. For budget purposes, a maximum cost of $13,000.00 Is recommended. This cost will not be exceeded without prior authorization. Aone IN 1-4. i~ t{y 2 N¢M City of Denton Department of Public Works Agenda No. 002 Proposal 12-18•GD February 18, 1991 Agenda Ilem tar Page 3 Ible - 07 r;r The estimated costs shown in this proposal are based on the anticipated soil conditions. The final Invoi e will be based on the specific quantities drllfed and tested. If unanticipated conditions are encountered during the survey, we will notify you accordingly. We will Initiate these studies within 7 days of receipt of notice to proceed, and anticipate that 4 to 5 working days will be required to complete the Ileld investlgation, You will receive the final report approximately three to four weeks following the completion of the ffold phase. r Thank you for the opportunity to present this proposal. Please read carefully the attached Terms for Geotechnical Engineering Services, Sign and return one copy as your authorization to proceed. Do not hesitate to call If you have any questions or if you have suggestions regarding changes to the nareement or to the proposed work scope. We look forward to working with you on the project. If any questions arise, please call. Sl rely, Charles M, Jackson E. Vice President, En nearing CMJ/ksf Copies submitted; (2) \r Hone 1 x r .~I City of Denton Department of Public Works Q Proposal 12.18-GD Agenda 110, February 18, 1991 D Page 4 Agenda Ilom_.~Qo.5_41 _ COST ESTIMATE ar EARTH ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY SURVEY DENTON SANITARY LANDFILL DENTCN, TEXAS FIELD INVESTIGATION 4 30 Hours, 2•man Crow @ $100.00/hour $ 3,000.00 6 Hours, Princlpal Engineer @ $90.00/hr ..........,......540.00 30 Hours, Staff Engineer (as required by the State) @ $55.001hour 1,050.0 y Subtotal, Field Investigation $ 5,190.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES Engineering Supervision, Analysis and Report Preparation 6 Hours, Senior Princlpal Engineer @ $90.00/hour $ 540.00 120 Hours, Staff Engineer or Englneering Geologist @ $55.00/hour 6,600.00 7 Hours, Drafting and Secretarial Support @ $30.00/hour.... .........................210.00 Subtotal, Engineering Services $7,350.00 TOTAL ESTIMATE $12,540,00 Based on this schedule, the total cost of Ihls investigation is estimated to be $11,000,00 to $13,000,00. Unit prices shown are applicable through December, 1992. Rone Engineers, Inc, reserves the right to modify quantities of above Items Including engineering servlces to account for specific conditions encountered In the field. Modiflcatfons may necessitate variations In portions of ,ne recommended budget. However, the upper Ilmit estimate will not he exceeded without prior authorization. C gone ii ~entla No.._ _lee TERMS FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING 4WAJV..I@~S - Ya EMENT 11110 -~•-a 7 ' MENT Is made by and between RONE ENGINEERS, INC., hereinafter relerrod to as GE07ECHNICALNEE~, and CITY OF EPARTMENT OF PUBLIC, WORKS, hereinafter referred to as CLIENT. MENT between the parties :onsists of these TERMS, the attached PROPOSAL fdenlified as Proposal No,12.18.GD, dated 11, 1991, and any exhibits k~r attachments noted in the PROPOSAL, Together, These elements will constitute the entire FEEN T superseding any and all pr or negotiations, correspondence, or agreements either written a oral. a T must be mutually agreed to In writing. Any changes to This F CARE CLIENT recognizes that subsurface conditions may very from those observed at locations where borings, surveys, or explorations are made, 40 and that site conditions may change with time. Data, Interpreta lions, and recommendations by GEOTECHNlCAL ENGINEER will be based solely on Nformatlon avellable to GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER Is responsible for those data, Interprelatfons, and recommendations, butwilf not be responsible for other pertiss'tnterprelallons or use of the Information developed, Services preformed by GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER under this AGREEMENT era expected by CLIENT to be conducted In a manner consistent wtlh the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the geotechnlcal engineering profession practicing contemporaneously under similar conditions in the locality of the protect. Under no ohcumstance is any warranty, expressed or implied, made in connection with the providing of geotechnical engineering services. SITE ACCESS AND SITE CONDITIONS CLIENT will grant or obtain free access to the site for all equipment and personnel necessary for GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER to perform the work set forth In this AGREEMENT. CLIENT will notify any and all possessors of the project site that CLIENT has granted GEOTECHNICAL ENGNEER free access to the site. OEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER will lake reasonable precautions to minimize damage to the site, but It is understood by CLIENT that, in the normal course of work, some damage may occur and the correction of such damage is not part of this AGREEMENT unless so specified in the PROPOSAL, CLIENT Is responsible for accurately delineating the locations of all subterranean struotures and ullitttea. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER wilt lake masonable precaullons to avoid known subterranean structures, and CLIENT waives any claim against GEOTECHNiCAL ENGINEER arising Irom damage done to subterranean structures and utilities not identified or accurately located. SAMPLE DISPOSAL OEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER will retain samples transported to the geolechnicaf laboratory for lasting for a period of thirty (30) days following submission of the report covering those samples. Further storage or transfer of samples can be made at CLIENT'S expense upon CLIENT'S prior written request. MONITORING If GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER Is retained by CLIENT to provide a site representative for the purpose of monitoring specific portions of construction work or other field activities as set forth in the PROPOSAL, then lhfs phrase applies. For the specified assignment, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER will report observations and professional opinions to CLIENT. No action of GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER or GEOTECHNICAL ENGNEER'S site representative can be construed as offering any AGREEMENT between CLIENT and others. OEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER will report lu CLIENT any observed goolachnicaily.relatod work which, In GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S professional opinion, does not conform with plans and speciflcalions. The GEOTECHNICAL ENGNEER has no right to reject or stop work of any agent of the CLIENT, Such rights are reserved solely for CLIENT. Furthermore, GEOTECHNICAL ENGNEER'Spresence on slto does not In any way guarantee the completion or qualify of the performance of the work of any party retained by CLIENT to provide field or conslructlon•related services, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER will not be responsible for and will not have control or charge of specific means, methods, techniques. sequences or procedures of construcflon or other field activities setected by any agent or agreement or CLIENT, or safety precautions and C programs incident thereto. Terms • Page I of 3 1 r, r r lisitt~ Agenda Ilant„_..ao- BILLING AND PAYMENT r CLIENT will pay GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER In accordance with the procedures indicated In the PROP and Its achments. Invoices will be submitted to CLIENT by GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, and will be duo and payable upon presentation. H CLIENT objects to all or any portion cf any Invoice, CLIENT will so notify GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER In writing within fourteen (14) calendar days of the invoice date, identify the cause of disagreement, and pay when due that portion of the invoice not in dispute. In the absence of written notification described above, the amount as stated on the Invoice will be paid, Invoices are delinquent If payment has not been received within thirty (30) days from date of invoice, At the option of the GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, CLIENT will pay an additional charge of ors-and-one-hall (1.5) percent per month (or the maximum percentage allowed by law, whichever Is lower) on any delinquent amount, except for any portion of the Invoiced amount In dispute and resolved in favor of CLIENT. Disputed amounts withheld by the CLIENT which are subsequently resolved In favor of the GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER will carry the additional charge, as described above, effective thirty (30) days from the dale of the original Invoice. In the ovens CLIENT falls to pay GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER within sixty (50) days after invoices are rendered, CLIENT agrees that GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER will have the right to consider the failure to pay the GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER's Invoice as a breach of thlo AGREEMENT. TERMINATION This AGREEMENT may be terminated by either party seven (7) days after written notice in the event of any breach of any provision of this AGREEMENT of in the event of substantial failure of performance by the other party, or if CLIENT suspends the work for more than three (3) months. In the event of termination, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER will be paid for services performed prior to the date of termination plus reasonable termination expenses, including, but not limited to the cost of completing analyses, records, and reports necessary to document job status at the lime of termination. RISKALLOCATION Many risks potenti.liy affect GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER by virtue of ontering into this AGREEMENT to perform professional engineering services on behalf of CLIENT The principal risk is the potential for human error by GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. For CLIENT to obtain the benefit of a fee which Includes a nominal allowance for dealing •vith GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S liability, CLIENT agrees to limit GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S liability to CLIENT and to all other partlae for claims arising out of GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S performance of the services described In this AGREEMENT. The aggregate liability ;,f GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER will not exceed the amount of the GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S fee for negligent professional acts, errors, cromissions, Umitatlons on liability and Indemnities In this AGREEMENT are business understandings between the parties voluntarily and knowingly entered into. and shall apply to all theof:;ma of recovery including, but not limited to breach of contract, warranty, tort (including negligence), strict of statutory liability, or any other cau to of action, except for willful misconduct or gross negligence. The parties also agree that CLIENT will not week damages in excess of the timitalons indfrecily through suits with other parties who may join GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER as a , tilled party defendant. Parties means CLIENT and GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER and their officers, employees, agunts, affiliates, and subcontractors. Both CLIENT and GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER agree that they will not be liable to each other, under any circumstances, for special, indirect, consequential, or punitive damages arising out of or related to this AGREEMENT. DISCOVERY OF UNANTICIPATED HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CLIENT represents that CLIENT has made a reasonable effort to evaluate if hazardous materials are on or near the project site, and that CLIENT has Informed GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER of CLIENT's findings relative to the possible presence of such materials. Hazardous materials may exist at a site where there is no reason to believe they could or should be present. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER and CLIENT agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials constitutes a changed condition mandating a ronegullatlon of the scope of work or termination of services. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER and CLIENT also agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous matariafs may make it necessary for GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER to take Immediate measures to protect health and safety. CLIENT agrees to compensate GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER for any equipment decontamination or other costs Incidont to the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER agrees to notify CLIENT when unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials are encountered. CLIENT agrees to make any disclosures required by law to the appropriate governing agencies. CUEN( also agrees to hold \ GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER harmless for any and all consequences of disclosures made by OEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER which are required by governing law, In the event the project site is not owned by CLIENT. CLIENT recognizes that It Is CLIENT'S responsibility to Inform the ; C Terms - Page 2 of 3 V. ,s 3 t r a: rr, Acanda No. tp9n a em n1 Fh of the discovery of unantfclpaled hazardous materials or suspectearraRardo~mefs a .-/~C ~~///jj~j~ any other provision of the AGREEMENT, CLIENT wolves any claim against GE0 ECHNICAI ENGINEER adsing from L ENGINEERS discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials, including, but not limited ated by delay of the project and any cost associated with possible reduction of the property's value. CLIENT will be responsible for ultimate disposal of any son ales secured by GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER which are found to be contaminated. This Includes any soil or rock cuttings, and contaminated drilling or wash water which Is generated as a consequence of drilling activities, DISPUTES RESOLUTION All claims, disputes, and other matters in controversy between GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER and CLIENT arising out of or In any way related w to this AGREEMENT will be submihed to 'altelmalive dispute resolution' (ADR) before and as a condition precedent to other remedies provided by law, if and to the extent CLIENT and GEOTECHNICAL ENr31NEER have agreed on methods for resolving such disputed, then such methods will be sot forth in the'Allernative Dispute Resolution Agreement" which, if attached, is Incorporated Into and made a part of 900 this AGREEMENT, If no specific ADR procedures is set forth in this AGREEMENT, than it shall be understood that the parries shall submit disputes to mediation as a Nndttion precedent to litigation. " If a dispute at few arises from matters related to the services provided under this AGREEMENT and that dispute requires litigation instead of ADR as provided above, then: (1) the claim will be brought and tried in Judlclal jurisdiction of the court of the county where GEOTECHNfCAL ENGINEERSs principal place of business is located and CLIENT waives the right to remove the actlon to any other county orjudlolal jurisdiction, and (2) the prevalling party will be entitled to recovery of all reasonable costs Incurred, Including staff time, court costs, attomays'fees, and other claim related expenses. GOVERNING LAW AND SURVIVAL The law of the State of Texas will govern the validity of these TERMS, their inlerpietatfon and performance. If any of the provisions conlained in this AGREEMENT are held Illegal, Invalid, or unenforceable, the enforceability of the remafnfng provisions will not be Impaired. G'milattons of fiabllily and Indemnities will survive terminalion of this AGREEMENT for any cause. Tho paiiles have toad the foregoing, understand completely the terms, and willingly enter Into this AGREEMENT which will become effective on the date signed below by CLIENT. BONE ENGINEERS INC _ CLIENT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER y 8y Charles M. Jackson, RE, Vice President Position Position December 11, 1991 Date Dale l Terms • page 3 013 ' y i CITY' r COUNCIL 4 I I t- - A oooo~oQaoaoaooooo0 oo°~{ °oo o 0 0 O00 ro ~ °0~accacl~W rt `i 'i l` A~ w CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Agenda No. Agonda Ilorti - TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Date FROM., Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: GTE Easement RECOMMENDATION: Approval of ordinance authorizing mayor to execute easement to GTE SUMMARY: GTE is converting their facility from overhead to underground and have requested an easement for this conversion. BACKGROUND: City of Denton and County of Denton jointly own this tract and is leased to the Texas National Armory Guard for 99 years (beginning 1-30-53). PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFEQTED None FISCAL IMPACT None AEEOOOCB -V 4 r. NI i e:\wpdocs\orftotter.ess r' ~i Agenda No. Agenda Isom ORDINANCE NO. W:a AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTONp TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE YOftO EXECUTE AN EASEMENT FROM THE CITY OF DENTON TO GTE SOUT`iWEST INCOR- PORATED; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the attached easement between the City of Denton and GTE southwest. " s CTION II. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this i:he _ day of , 1992. J BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY I Y f _ BY: a~ tr, I MC 400460 Epn65-A IaEV. 1.411 THE STATE OF TEXAEXCHANCE___DENTON KNOW ALL MEN BY THE PRESEMI COUNTY OFDENTON n ORDER NO----.-..------ Tbat_ Clrv of Denton, Texas and Count.,..yof Denton, Texas 111 of the County of. Denton _ .-A Stage aillormaid, for and (a of the fm of doli/ `AQC~ed \`eC~ ` tell Dou1n is 10.00 f io us in hard paid by VfE Sculh.ar rneorpontel. W s Delaware mryolrtron. the raeipl of A hirh is hereby ackmwledgM and confessed, have this day nM6d Ind conveyed and do, by them posts 1, grin and eQ ,~,a convey vnlo GTE SoutAam Inrorpunted, in Iuttaswrs and asligm, A aumenl [en width, to ton6lrucr, pines. QhJ y`J`{tw operate, taped, mrmum, Iepsir, reptue and rcmove such burled communiulbn able u Grants may from time to time requu6, consisting of buned able, vGG markers and wtmary ri+turet rend appunenorKea, over, retail, under Ind upon the folloring described property In wit: C4 Being a portion of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, being out of the E. Puchalskl Survey, Abst. )998, and being a part of a tract of land as conveyed from W.C. Potter and wife, MaybeLl Wallace Potter to the City of Denton and the County of Denton by deed dated 12-18-52 and recorded in Volume 383, Page 187 of the deed records of Denton County, Texas, and more particularly described as follows: 4 Beginning at a point of intersection of the north boundary line of said tract and the west boundary line of the Gulf Colorado and Santa Fe Railroad property , to the point where the said west boundary line of the Gulf Colorado and Santa Fe Railroad property intersects the south boundary Line of said City of Denton and County of Denton tract; Thence, north 88° 23' west along said south boundary line a distance of 10 feet for a ,.AN point for corner; Thence, northward 10 feet from and parallel with the Gulf Colorado and Santa Fe Railroad to a point where said line intersects the north boundary line of the City of Denton and County of Denton tract, said point also being in the south boundary line of Prairie St.; Thence, eastward along the north boundary line of said tract and the south boundary line of rrairie St. to mint of beginning, containing .098 acres of land more or Less. SRualed to Denton, Texas County, State of sod the Chr(d reompLraa the genial mum at mid Wae, u above deaerlbed, to bared upon pallmloary ourwy only, and Crulor(l) hereby Apee(d dial the eueeeet hereby granted a" apply to the adual location of said Use sebal oomtructed. Grantor coveolou for himself, his luairmmon and udgm, sat to PlAM or maintain any building or struewe ft mid statement Grantor voanu to the Calcites the might of toVeu ud agrees over my (ow) Adlarmet taaida to or from mad right of way for the purpor6 of tnmpecuog, otaiatowal eonnrecuog, ranooltrvetldg, openung and removing Itt buried comarawatiou able sod Auoc L,tei s Appurtaances over, under, aesou and upon the above described pruparty, and the right to alarm makers and other devices to nsppett or mark mid wruWCUOO where ne,tsmrri The Grano, start agrees in leclude the right to retool sold buried wmmuntauon able on mid permits to conlorm to any future highway reloatlon, wldentng or lmprovememl. The Grouter och+ow16310 that the wmidarauon rewired above imchldom wmpossai for any and 1U damages to the surf," or pea or aopa looted thereon resulting from odpal mutructioo Ly Gionim. Should Grantee or its assets or employes, mbsenueut W ou"i tamllstloo of wmmumlatloe fictttles 9,10" the uASaimm described above, have oeasloo to ester upon the premises in perlorm maintenance upon such fsetlltlm. Gnome epees to pay Oroowi the renal caab what of that portion of taps destroyed to the coupe of perlomaaiu of rich Irainamaaice; and Grunion apau to reactive ruch amount to full dHCbefga of any claim for des"ll wbich v might have bisect advertised. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD du above desolbeet am mot and hiahu unto the rid Chances, its rucrssors said sofas, imul mid Uoe ahaU ion abandoned, And I (wt) do hereby btad myuU (ourselves), my (oar) legal repeamomtlws, to wwraat and forever dai all and angulaor this above dumbed uammet asill flights unto the sold Gammas. W sueea sort and ewgm, agelnet wary panne erbolnaor+w tawtully chiming or to claim the $am u any put drwamf. EXECUTED day of_.__19- City of Denton, Texas County of Denton, lesas r. CEIITIFICATE OF ACKNOtVi.COGhtC.NT FOR 1NDWIDUAM THE STATE OF.. County of BEFORE ME, the uoderdmad autbodty, on thin day personally appeued r. lvow to me to be the portion G1 whoa uw (r) tl (a») rvbacrtbed to the fougolai Wtrm+mO and arJmowled pd to me that..-_ r! executed " ems for tM r g , i and ooal mwa t6wdn eaPresred. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE t4Je.~•-•-• day A. D. 19_.... Notary Pu*bll _Couory, to n 10 n a gal 0 O, N 9 8 " n n Av +O p = In I 0 x•. B Ss y f I ! Jo S F Ic 7 iy I ~ ~ a 0. n o B~ V e ~ or 1M I I ~ a I i~~ h y ~ i~ E ~ pgp ~ Axx a lu ~ I ' CERTIFICATE OF ACYNOWLEDOMENT FOR WDTYMUALS THE STATE OF.._~.------- County of BEFORE ME, the rud"gned authority, on this day pmecullY eppared know„ to me to be the pennn (1) whose name (s) u (sre) mbtotbed to the loregoing tattrument, and aclmowledged to me that__~__ executed the am lot the purposes and corulderstloo thwelo eaprmsed. A. D. lB_ GIVEN UNDER WY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE of - Notary Publlc_ -..__Coooty, CORPORATION AL'KNOWLEDGMENT THE STATE OP-. of.._.._----- ll} County BEFORE ME, the uodetstgoed, a Notary Pribbo in and for Wd County and State, on LW day persauauy oppateol Imowo to me to be the paaon and offtm whoa name ti nrburibtd to the fotegotng lostnunenl and ardmewledged to mo that On ame wrt the ant of (he ald_------ and that he erecated the am a the act of turn torwrodon for the purposes and eomldentl: n therein expressed, end to We mmci(y v,Nr1u yimbl. ~ CIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE tnfs the....-.---day of A. Dto ISEAL) Notary ELbltc lA e0d%76r ConntY. Y. C 4A i~ it iI. Agenda No. J Z - Aganda Ilen - S, Date NORTH Loop zee T,& P. MX&T. R.R, INTERSTATE HWY. 35 U.S. 77 SHERMAN DR. • U,8 HWY. 300 LOCUST LOOP CARROLL OLVD. 5172e OAK WKIWAffY D0170N AIRPORT KKST. RR INTERSTATE 3e WEST TEASLEY LN. a T.&P. MK&T RR INTERSTATE 35 EAST SANTA FE R. R. P.M. 2101 U.S. HWY. 377 1 ,f i ;i i; _ A I4 WARRAN71' 111`M]--WW Finrb. 10,1 arl WIN" 51P,,.1e ddnndnlmmu MAPIIM SiH In,Iry C.., Ihllr ! THE STA'1'L OF 'I'EXA5Know ]1tvlclt By These Presents; ` COUNTY OF... PEN7.A2i / (j~ Voc. 3e3 Agenda No. we, N, C. Potter and wife, Maydoll Wallace Potter P~' l87 Agenda Ilem_ (5i -~T Wt0 4_ of the County a! Denton State of Texas - - - for and to aluidendoo of VIA :5e the sumof'THREE THOUSAND ($3000,00) AND N0~100 . I . _ «DCUARS, cash I It to us to bud patd by the City of Denton, Tsxas, a Municipal ff corporation and the County of Denton, a political subdivision of the State of Texas, in equal amounts of Fifteen hundred Dollars from each of said grantees, i bane (Iranted, Sold and Conveyed, and by tbeu preeenu do Craw, Sen and Convey unto the Bald ~j City of Denton, Texas and County of r, Aon of Ito County of Denton State of Texas all that cettala I tract or parcel of land, lyinn and being situated in the County of I Denton Stale of 'texas, being out or the E. Puchalski Survey, Abstract No. OH, and heinq a part of 84 acres described in deed from Midland Life Insurance Corlpany to h', C. Potter and Life :laydell Potter, datod j May 1, 1040, as shoran of record in Vol. «84, Fage 83 of the Dead f Records or Denton County, Texas, and being more particularly described as followst DfdCTN WO at a point in the south boundary line of the above mentioned 84 acre tract, said point hoing the southwest corner of a 1,81 acre ;i tract caned by 11, C. Potter, said point nlt+o being the southeast corner of the 10 acre tract conveyed herewith Said poinIL being located 103,00 varas (453 foot) north Ss degrees 2a ntinutes west of the soutlitrest right-I, Of-Way line of the now U, S, Hirhtaay No. 771 i I~ THEXCF North 88 de,-,roes 23 minutes 'l'est alon,r, said south boundary line i a distance of 31)8,010 varas (1105,6 feet) to a point for tno southwest corner of said 10 acre tract conveyed herowlth; I T111i\CE North 1 dogree 37 minutes east a distance of 141.84 vnras (3041) f to a point for the northwest corner of said 10 ncve tract conveyed herewith, said point also being in the south boundary line of Prairie Street( I~ t b Y y ~ 1) if THLNCh South 08 dogreas 23 minutes east nlonr• the south boundary line or Prairie Street n distance of 398.010 varas (1106.0 foot) to a t point for the northeast correr of said 10 acre tract conveyed lteret+i thl said point nlso hein, in the southwest boundary line of a .G.4A acre tract conveyed by W. C. Potter and wife to the 'texas I1ifliv4'-Department for right-of-way Purposes for the new U.S. Highway No. 771 A(]Bf1d0HD..lt1L~'// C South 1 degree 37 minutes west a distance of 141.84 vase P Agenda41am b {394 feet) the southeast corner of said 10 acre tract and point J p ginning. We The above described trnot of Land contains 10 acres, more or less. ~ 4 , I TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described premles, together with all aa1 singular, the dgbta and j nppurteaancea thereto fa soywtse belonging onto the said City of Denton, Te-Ms and the County of Denton, their successors f XUand assign forever; and we do hereby bind ourselves, our ~I bdrs, ,),moron and adminlstralon, to Warrant wad Forever Defend all sad singular the said premises unto the kj said City of Denton, Texas and County of Denton, their successorts r f itatm and assigns, against every person wbomsmver lawfully dalmleg, or to data. the same, or any pats thtreof. this 18th day at Nhnesa our hands at Denton, Texas ~i December A.D. 19 62. Witoea at Request of Gnsatost 1..~U...... t eryt 161N nail C'7 ♦ 6atlnt,tt I71 x ~1.. 1 ItryHe,4i . . LNU F Y r~ ii S~ v Agonda No. ^7~ !'hit the city or Menton, Texas r.nd the Cnanty or Menton, A(;onUa Ilom_R! . C111o ..L-- ;nth !)e*:"- ':,tdirs oolitic ::nc' cornoratc, hcrcinrftar. _ r :led ),a^-rorn, °or :.nd in r,~mrtdmat'on 01' the -t~10n of Ten '7 ultr.rs 010.00) a- '1t in hanr. ~c:±d !)y tile To:S-El "ur r:1 ;.rmury 1!ovrc:, a body roll? ir, : nd cur^nr: to, existing n):',:r the laws or kite State of reins, horein,^.rtr,r tolled l,:rrce, t I a receint of which is hereby oc!cnot)led;;ed and conrcnrec3, has lc^sod rnd deasad, -ne by thet;e presents does 1." rc : nd ddmiso 'Into the sold bcpsee the foltovin- tract or T+'' ncrcol of land located In the City of Menton, Texas, ;:nd lore rr.rticularly doscrthed as follows, tn-.,its All that cer'..in tract or !,:,reol of land lying and bel„g 'i tuated in 'lie County or i)ento)t, State or roxas be r~r-tt or the 'I. P~_rchnlski ')urvey, ,`•h5t, ;Otte, and ~)oing a n:rt of 011 '.•t•ea described 'n deed frON :'idlonc! Life Insurance C,,:^rny to t!, C. )'otter-!,m' • i('c "aydoll :.llaco "otter, c!atod liay It i8-!0, na 0101 r,f t•OCOrd in 'all 2049 Prr~e 83 of t hp Docd Records nr 1)enton C tatty, Toxrrt, , nd hoittT nm•e p rticulnrly c:cscribor, ns follows; at ,a <•o!nt in the south ?o'.md.°cy tine of the r.hmrc :sentiotlod Wnoro tract, .laid -oint ')oinLI the amtth. );ont corner or a 1,61 vere tract utnod by 'a, C, Potter, aid point - 1 :o hotn, the r,•,uthe:•at corner of the 10 ecre ivact convcycc! herewlth~ sole! mint hoinn locm.ted 163,08 v;u'as (453 foot) north 68 dc,-rocs 23 ninitles wort of the oouthtrest ri••ht-of-way lino o,' the new U.S, J11ghtray No, 77; R" fCR North 30 derroos 23 inutca west chair said south h•und,,ry Poe a clistanco or 308,016 varac(1105,eoot) to a "nint ror the southwcet cornor of seid ten -ere tract conveyed herc:P th; '111'XrEs north 1 deCreo 37 •!1nutcs east a clft trance or 1.11,34 vnran (304 fort) to a --aint I'ar the north-mst corner of aid ten •,orr.' tract conveyer: lturewitlr, onid point also ',c!n, in the ^nuth 'oo•.ind:try line or Prairie street; "'FNcrr south "6 de. r:es 23 :mutes cost r.l(ittL the tnulh -^cdary i1no ut' Pralrio ~trcet a distr.nco of M,016 var.,^s (110566 foot) to n point t'or the norther•st corner of tho ten acrd tr^•ct conveyed hororrlth said noint- Iwo he!nr in the southrait ')oundnry' lino P a C,d4 rcro iracyyt con- -Lmtdfor ri I)t-ortway ~Ur olfs rortho newni.S. 1,'1r-1)tr:yTtbt- 77; -V(33 , - c rep .~1 u.t'•e:; t:crt a c:i: trnrd of 1,11.84 "araa (394 to tho a• ithecut corner of uid ten tore toast :n•' to the -)lcco or bc~T)nring, ::nd cont,-Jning ten acres of innr , r)oro or lrs , t C k ;U i•,.,. J :LU tl:o +:e +i .^c: •+relii.:es unto lho ;;Ad ~ Lc 'roe, !ts „nccrr o:s not asr'i;'ns Cron this; ".'.to fur and Agenda No,-~.. u:!u•inL ::utc: unto tha cncl of the felt term of nancCy -nine (0'J) Agenda Ilnm-~ /n~~ hence no>a on;uing ~:n: fully to be tom+leto: and anc:r•~, Iwo Tt is understood nn:l ::Freud '!y r,nu but -:u the parties r FT 0 Jj hcreta '.lint at the terninat.'++n of thIt, lease atl 'luiWings ++truntures and otter equlnment -heed on the dcntsed )remises • the term or (It's lease :?hall I>euome the -^ror)orty of the Los•,ors. Lessee covenants and n!,rees to coru7unce construction or n ilding or huildings suit:+''.1e for use of a, unit of the To:( s National ware! within trco (2) yor.rs from the Onto here- ofl tt !icing sndorsiood that fn the went thlo covenant he not o;,::rved by Lossee, thin contract uhail hvcoste null and void nn;' '.hose preciloca s1:a11 wholly and ahsolutuly revert to Lo9riors, Lessors aoreo to provide, , t their Olin m:^cnao all '.t:?c09.° ry o:rt er, lirht and he++t inq extensions to :+ithin five feet of any lirdldln;; on or rl•ict: mry he 1 cod nn said Are rtsos, In an "Al .uas it is 1 ,^rncttcal to rr+'•:c the sanitrsy arer systan or the City of Irent(in awile+lo to juch nromi+.es, the Lessors agree that they will construct and n^y for a sonic tr:t:c to dispose or tile sewera,,e. E:XCCT&D in Ow)licate it is =,day of ianu+.ry, 1063. n SSTY OF bP:`'TUS, ~":`~S5 :7ayor L t*Q .ovn y u+ ~ o I ' -C way 'ter er ns,:ortn Cha 'u+an Carl L. k'hin ay C Treaouror A'rT ;ST r e n - _ t~ f 'CITY COUNCIL R u --._OUOOQQQGOF0 Q~~ ~ F yObpo~ 0 0 0 G L r M. Agenda No. Agenda Ilom tJC31o a~~,? CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS'782011Z PHONE (817) 668.8307 Office of the City Manager M E M O R A N D U M TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager DATE: January 13, 1991 SUBJECT: Sidewalk Ordinance In reviewing several sections of the new codification, It has come to both mine and the City Attorney's attention that we do not have an ordinance that clearly speaks to the question of who should maintain sidewalks in front of their cities that Debra is familiar with, as we 11 astthe ones nth tlltam familiar with, cities have this kind of ordinance. Indeed, in our code, it appears like the Le may have been some attempts at clarifying these responsibilities. However, in the opinion of the Attorney, there is no clear delineation. Therefore, I have asked Legal to prepare an ordinance that would clearly define responsibilities. This ordinance is very much like the ordinances that require landowners to maintain the boulevard, or right-of- way, area in front of their property, a I believe the ordinance is very straight forward. It makes the maintenance responsibility the responsibility of the land owner. It sets up some procedures whereby the city could step in and remedy particularly dangerous situations and then bill or attach liens to the property, The Attorney advises that it is still possible for the city to step in and construct large projects as is currently the case, If you or the Council has further questions, I would be happy to try and answer them at your convenience, Rick S e I Deputy City Manager RS:bw AMMOOOB6 5. t z +t Agondo No. % Agcwla Ilom_, Ikile =I 9Z ORDINANCE NO. p~ Z ~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING ARTICLE II OF DIVISION II OF CHAPTER 25 ("STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND PUBLIC PLACES") OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO REQUIRE ABUTTING OWNERS TO REPAIR DE- FECTIVE SIDEWALKS; MAKING ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS LIABLE FOR IN- JURIES CAUSED BY DEFECTIVE SIDEWALKS; PROVIDING FOR THE FIXING OF A LIEN FOR THE COST 01' REPAIR; PROVIDING FOR PENALTY IN THE MAXI- MUM AMOUNT OF $500.00; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. o THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I, That sections 25-55 through 25-60 of Chapter 25 of the Code of ordinances are amended to read as follows: Sae. 25-55. Repairs by Abutting Property Owners. The owner of real property abutting upon any defec- tive sidewalk shall reconstruct or repair the same at the owner's expense. The duty to repair exists independently of any action by the city to notify the abutting owner of the defective sidewalk. When a sidewalk is found to be defective, the City shall notify the owner of the abut- ting property to reconstruct or repair the same. Any owner who knowingly fails to reconstruct or repair the defective sidewalk within 30 days after the date notica is sent is guilty of an offense. Sao. 25-56. Repair by City; Liability and Liens. If any person fails or refuses to repair or recon- struct a defective sidewalk after notice is given as required by this Division, the city may, but assumes no , duty to do so, go upon the property and do or cause to be done the work nocessary to correct the defective side- walk. The expense incurred by the City shall be a per- sonal obligation of the owner of the abutting property. If the owner fails or refuses to pay the expense within 30 days after the City gives notice thereof, the City shall file a statement of the cost with the county clerk. The filing shall constitute a privileged lien against the property, second only to liens for taxes and street im- provements, to secure the payment of the cost incurred. The cost shall bear interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum from the date the statement is filed with the county clerk. The City may file suit for recovery of the funds by foreclosure of the property on which the lien exists. C n kenda Na. , . _ Afjwida Seo. 25-57. Liability of Abutting property owners r injuries. (a) The abutting property owner shall be primarily liable in damages to any person who suffers any loss or d sidewalk. amage because of a defective condition of the abutting The t shall held liability for any act its performs pursuant stoethis Chapter, including the inspecting of sidewalks or the giving of notice to abutting owners. (b) It shall be the duty of any property owner, ten- ant, or other person making special use of any sidewalk for the purpose of ingress or egress, for loading eleva- tors, downspout drains or any other special use of what- ever kind or character, to keep the sidewalk, parkway, driveway, or other area within the public right-of-way that is open to the public for pedestrian use free from defects and hazards of every kind and character. The special user shall be liable in damages to any person who suffers any loss or damage because of a defective condi- tion of the sidewalk, driveway, parkway or other area within the public right-of-way which is available to the public for pedestrian use. See. 25-58. Definitions. (a) Abutting Property. The real property that is con- tiguous to or contains a sidewalk. (b) Sidewalk. That portion of the public right of way between the curb lines of a street, or the lateral lines of a roadway, and the adjacent or abutting property lines intended for the use of pedestrians. (c) Defective sidewalk. Sidewalk sections that are upheaved or depressed, thereby causing an abrupt change in grade of 40% or more (two inches vertical in 10 inches horizontal) or creates an unsafe condi- tion as determined by the City Engineer or his or her designee. B99TTON IL, That sections 25-59 and 25-60 of Chapter 25 of the code of ordinances are repealed. 4QTJSN ITI The provisions of this ordinance are separable, and the invalidity of any phrase or part of this ordinance shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remainder of the ordinance. C 2 r, Y h f4 ;`?LR1gt `.i ra Agonda No, AgWil Item Data o s•CmroN IV That this ordinance shall become effect tvel7.ur- ance teen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of, this ordinto be papersof het City ofeeDant nton Texas, Record-Chronicle, ten t (10) official days of ethe date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of ° 1992. ATTEST: BOH CASTLEHERR YRRY MAYOR JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: fl , 3 { c. C STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND PUBLIC PLACES § 26,62 (b) New apartment complexes of two (2) or more buildings and existing apartment com• plexes of two (2) or more buildings which are not presently numbered shall have numbers at least ten (10) inches tell. Such numbers shall be of a contrasting color to that of the surface on which they are mounted, (c) Existing apartment buildings which already have identifying numbers maybe allowed to continue to use those numbers if they are fudged by the chiefs of the police and fire departments to be clearly visible and readable from the street or driveway serving the build, inga. (d) The owner or manager of apartment buildings with identifying numbers shall request an inspection of the buildings by notifying the city building inspection division to determine If the numbers are visible and readable from the street and driveways serving the buildings. (Ord. No. 88.016, § VI(21.19), 1.1988) Sees, 26.14-26.40. Reserved. Agenda No, AOsnda Item-._XS_J/aG NIB AR7ICLE H. CONSTRUCTION AND REPAIR J!~ c7 DIVISION 1. GENERALLY 0 Sees. 26.41-2660. Reserved. DIVISION 2. SIDEWALKS, CURBS AND GUTTERS* Sec. 25.51, Permit required. It shall be unlawful for any person to construct, reconstruct or repair any sidewalk, curb or gutter in the city without first obtaining a permit from the engineering department of the city for such work. (Code 1966, § 21.24) See, 2552. Bond required. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to construct, reconstruct or repair any sidewalk, curb or gutter in the city without having first executed and delivered to the building Inspection division a current approved corporate surety bond in the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000,00), and such bond shall be conditioned as follows; (1) That all work done by the principal in the construction, reconstruction or repair of any sidewalk or curb and gutter shall be performed in a g^od and workmanlike manner and in faithful and strict compliance with all ordincncos, rules and regula• tions approved by the city council governing the construction, reconstruction or repair of sidewalks or curbs and gutters; 'Cross reference-Housing generally, Ch. 16. 1685 \ INFORMATION PRESENTED TO COUNCIL AT MEETING OF 1-21-522 ~ v l9 It `t § 25.52 DENTON CODE Nonda No. Apogdallg,~mr 2) That the principal shall dally indemnify and hold the city tivBttfe/artE I~arhrtese fi any and all cost, expense or damage, whether real or asserted, because of any inju done to any person or property in the prosecution of the work or that may arise out of or be occasioned by the performance of such work, (3) That the principal shall, without additional cost to the person for whom the work was done, maintain all sidewalks or curbs and gutters constructed, reconstructed or re- paired by the principal for a period of one (1) year from the date of such work and within ten (10) days after notice from the engineering department of the city that a maintenance is necessary, and that the opinion of the city engineer as to the necessity for maintenance at any time within the one-year period shall be conclusive; (4) That such bond shall be in force for a continuous period of one (1) year after any sidewalk or curb and gutter Is constructed, reconstructed or repaired by the principal, and that one (1) recovery shall not exhaust such bond, but such bond shall be a continuing obligation against the sureties thereon until the entire amount therein provided for shall have been exhausted; (5) That the principal shall upon notice from the city engineering department post an additional bond in the amount of any decrease in the original bond by reason of recovery thereunder; (6) That the city may for itself or for the use and benefit of any person injured or damaged 1 by reason of any defective construction, reconstruction or repair of any sidewalk or curb and gutter by the principal, maintain suit on the bond in any court of competent jurisdiction or that any such inJtured or damaged person may sue and recover there- under in his own behalf. (b) The city council may increase the amount of the bond of any person at any time such action is deemed necessary to pro',ct the interests of the city. (c) Any owner of real estate repairing or engaging another to repair his own sidewalk shall not be required to give such bond, (Code 1966, § 21.25) See. 26.83. Construction to comply to standard specifications, It shall be unlawful for any person to construct, reconstruct or repair any sidewalk or curb and gutter in the city, except in strict compliance with the Standards Specifications for Public Works Construction, as adopted by the city council, and amended from time to time, (Code 1966, § 21.26) See. 2664, Removal and replacement of ourbs and gutters. (a) All curbs and gutters to be replaced shall be removed to the next expansion joint on both sides of the area, or, with the approval of the city, the curb and gutter may be sawed with a concrete saw to produce a smooth joint, 1686 ` r 11 I~ )1 ~I I t S'T'REETS, SIDEWALKS AND PUBLIC PLACES § 25.08 lb? All curbs and gutters shall be replaced within forty-eight (48) hours of removal unless an extension is granted by the city, ;cr Where curbs and gutters are removed for driveways, construction work or other pur• poses, the complete curb and gutter shall be removed. Any asphalt removed shall be replaced after the curb and gutter have been replaced. The profile of the Bowline of the gutter section shall be maintained throughout so that existing drainage is unobstructed. (Code 1966, § 21.27) 9 Sea 26.66, Form of resolution ordering construction, (a) The city council may by resolution passed by a majority vote, order the construction, reconstruction or repair of sidewalks or curbs and gutters along any section or part thereof in the city or in front of any property abutting upon the sidewalk, curb or gutter. (b) The resolution shall, in general terms, describe such sidewalks or curbs and gutters and the street, avenue, alley or place or section or part thereof along which such sidewalks or curbs and gutters are to be constructed, reconstructed or repaired. The council shall have the power to assess the whole cost of any such sidewalk and/or curb and gutter or any part thereof against the property abutting or fronting thereon and against the owner thereof, except the cost of excavation and grading which shall be borne by the city. (Code 1966, § 21.32) Sea 25.56. Abutting property owners to pay certain costs. It shall be the duty of the owner of property abutting on any street, avenue, alley, place or square or section or part thereof where sidewalks or-curbs and-gutters have been ordered by the city council to be constructed, reconstructed or repaired as provided in this division, withbi thirty (30) days from the date of the publication ofnotice and'the gibing,of personar notice, to construct, reconstruct or repair such sidewalk or curb and gutter in. accordance with the specifications mentioned in such notices and pay all cost and' expense of the construction, reconstruction or repair, except the cost of excavating and grading which shall be borne by the city. (Code 1966, § 21.35) Sec, 2557. Authority to use other methods. Nothing in this division shall be construed as a limitation upon the power of the city council to use another authority or method for the construction, reconstruction or repair of sidewalks or curbs and gutters and for the assessment of the costs of construction, reconstruc- tion or repair against the abutting property owners. (Code 1966, § 21.36) Sec. 2558, Repair or replacement-City to bear costal exception, The superintendent of streets is hereby authorized to repair or replace sidewalks or curbs and gutters that meet the criteria of section 25.51, with the city bearing the total cost of r 1687 Aoantla No. _ j2~pQ7r A90ul)a ITenl__- (kilo F' (i Si a E § 25.58 DENTON CODE excavation and removal and the total cost of labor in repairing and replacing such sidewalks, curbs and gutters if the abutting property owner, prior to the commencement of such work, pays to the city the cost of materials for the project as determined by the superintendent of streets, (Code 1966, § 21.37) Sec, 26.69. Same-Criteria, Criteria for sidewalk repair or replacement as provided in section 26.68 shall be as follows: (1) The sidewalk location must be in the city right-of-way, (2) A minimum of fifteen (16) linear feet per residence must meet these repair or replace. ment criteria. Moo (3) Sections to be replaced must be shattered or cracked or structurally unsound, based on the following: a, Sections that have holes in them two (2) inches or more in diameter or that are cracked or broken with missing or loose pieces; b. Sections that are upheaved or depressed, thereby causing an abrupt change in grade of forty (40) percent or more (two-inch vertical in ten (10) inches horizontal) or creates an unsafe condition as designated by the superintendent of streets; j c. Sections having surface spalling only will not be considered criteria for replace. ment. These areas will only be considered if the superintendent of streets deter- mines they create an extremely unsafe condition. (Code 1966, § 21.38) Sea 2660, Same-Limitations, The provisions of sections 26.68 and 26.69 shall be limited to replacement and repair of existing sidewalks abutting residential areas. It shall not apply to new construction or side. walks abutting nonresidential property. The procedures in sections 26.68 and 26.69 may not be utilized if the city council has, by resolution, ordered the construction or repair of sidewalks, (Code 1966, § 21.39) Sees, 26.81-26.70, Reserved, DIVISION 3, RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION See, 26.71, Permit-Required. It shall be unlawful for any person to dig up, break and excavate, tunnel, undermine or In any manner break up any public street, sidewalk, driveway or other public property or to make 1688 Nenda No. _..~p~"'aQ_~ Agenda non -l1e_~~_---.._ \ title ti i r f CITY COUNCIL + +f4 0ooooogoaoaaaaooo = o. ~o 0 00 F ' Gl ~rYi-: WF+ 1. _ _ _I ~ 111-~ru~~ 1 ~ rr. < 1 f hx r. I *rr i 14- `~fr', L ~1~+-1 +YLa l I~l '.L s ~ za N Ppenda No, Ago{ida Itom_ - ~ OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTQ&N.EY MEMORANDUM / TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the city council FROM: Debra A. Drayovitch, City Attorney SUBJECT: "Revolving Door" Ordinance DATE: January 17, 1992 Pursuant to your request at the Council meeting of December 10, 1991, attached is an ordinance which prohibits former council- members from entering into contracts with the City for a certain period after they leave office. Also attached is a copy of the minutes from the December 10 meeting. The ordinance as originally drafted last summer contained a one-year prohibition. However, the attached ordinance does not specify the period during which the former councilmembers are prohibited from entering into contracts with the City. should you have any questions in this regard, please let me know. Debra A. Drayovitch DAD:js Attachments A po: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager ALL'9111) hDeXcaral In Qualily Sercics" L'r f 1 ~i 9twpdocs\69144.0 Nenda No, Ago0a Uom JJ Z! ORDINANCE NO. Dale AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 10 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO PROHIBIT CERTAIN CONTRACTS WITH FORMER COUNCILMEMBERS FOR A CERTAIN PERIOD; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY GRDAINS: SECTION I. That Chapter 10 of the Code of ordinances is amended by adding a new section 10.36 to read as follows: Sec. 10-36. Contracts with Former Councilmembers. (a) The City shall not, within after a councilmember leaves office, enter into a contract with any business entity in which the former council member has a substantial interest. The prohibition of this paragraph shall not apply to: (1) a contract required to be awarded to the lowest respon- sible bidder through competitive sealed bids as re- quired by State law; (2) a contract to purchase items that are available from only one source as specified in Tex. Loc. Gov't Code, Chapter 252, as amended; (3) a contract required to receive a city service or parti- cipate in a city program which is available to the gen- eral public; (4) a contract that is necessary to preserve or protect the public health or safety of the citizens or because of a public calamity that requires the immediate appropri- ation of money to relieve the necessity of the munici- pality's residents or to preserve the property of the municipality; and (5) the purchase of real estate or an interest in real estate. (b) For purposes of this section, a person has a substan- tial interest in a business entity if: (1) the person owns ten percent (30%) or more of the voting stock or shares of the business entity; i h u S~ V A001)da No. c"~ Z~" Aoenda Itemm_I_ _DD~Z_(2L/,,.:. Onto (2) owns either ten percent (10%) or more or $5,000 o ore? of the fair market value of the business entity; or (3) funds received by the person from the business entity exceed ten percent (10t) of the person's gross income for the previous year. (c) A former councilmember is considered to have a substantial interest under this section if a person related to the former councilmember in the first degree by consanguinity or affinity has a substantial interest under this section. v (d) For purposes of this section, a "business entity" means a sole proprietorship, partnership, firm, corporation, holding company, joint-stock company, receivership, trust, or any other entity recognized by law. SECTION II. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this agreement, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of compe- tent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this agreement, and the parties hereby declare they would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective im- mediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the - day of , 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY:_ Page 2 q ,ten ~ CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MIgTE~ ~7T Itom TUESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 1991 or l& The City Council convened Into the Planning Seminar Updates (O p.m, in the Civil Defense Room. Present: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Hopkin-~t Council Members Alexander, Chew, Perry, Smith and Trent. 1. The City Council received reports from the City's Executive Staff on activities for the next six months, A. The Council received a report from Frank Robbins, Executive Director of Planning and Development, on a departmental activities occurring in the next six months (December through May). B. The Council received a report from Betty McKean, Executive Director of Municipal Services/Economic-.40 Development, on departmental activities occurring in the next six months (December through May). C. The Council received a report from John McGrane, Executive Director of Finance, on departmental activities occurring in the next six months (December through May). D. The Council received a report from R. E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities, on departmental activities occurring in the nett six months (December through .day) . E. The Council received a report from Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, on departmental activities occurring in the next six months (December through May). 2. The City Council received a report and held a discussion regarding ongoing capital improvement projects. Deputy City Manager Rick Svehla reported on the status of ongoing capital improvement projects. 3. The City Council received a report and held a discussion regarding a proposed schedule to complete the approved CIP and discuss future bond proposals. City Manager Lloyd Harrell presented the status of the city's bond program and reviewed potential alternatives for funding future CIP improvements. A memorandum on 1992 CIP funding issues was presented to the Council. The City Council recessed at 6:10 p.m. and reconvened at 6:43 p.m. in the City Managers Conference Room. C s t ,k City of Denton City Council Minutes Nonda No. December 10, 1991 Page 2 AdenU.n Itom-_ Wo 1_~ 1-9 to 4, The Cj.1:y Council received a report and held a 'dlscusillon regarding the status of City Council Goals for 1991. City Manager Lloyd Harrell provided a summary of the status of the 1991 Council goals, Councilmember John Trent asked how much Community Development Block Grant funding had been spent on demolition activities. Councilmember Harold Perry requested a cost-benefit analysis of the city's economic development efforts, including an analysis by the city's new internal auditor, Councilmember Jane Hopkins stated a need for the City Council to consider the appointment of a citizens charter revision commission, At a minimum, she suggested that the item be placed on a future agenda in order to decide one way or another. Councilmember Perry stated that he did not think a committee was necessary since major charter changes were unnecessary. Councilmember Trent commented that it would be up to the citizens committee to decide whether changes were needed. Councilmember Alexander added that no issues in the Charter needed changing other than those items that conflicted with state or federal law and the 6% payback provision. Councilmember Chew also stated that a revision committee was not needed. Mayor Castleberry remarked that the Charter needed to be look at after ten years, Councilmember Smith suggested that a list of housekeeping items and other issues be compiled for the Council to review at a future date. The Council decided to discuss the matter at a future worksession in February or March in order to give themselves an opportunity to give the City Manager feedback by February 1. The City Manager also suggested that the Council review the Model Cities Charter for ideas. The Council requested that copies of the model charter be provide to them after Jan 1. 5. The Council received a report and held a discussion on possible city code of ethics. City Manager Lloyd Harrell introduced the item and presented samples of, code of ethics from various cities. I 1 Councilmember Smith favored the Plano ordinance stipulating no city contracts with past councilmembers for a period of time. Mayor Castleberry asked for consensus. Consensus was given, Councilmember Perry asked if a motion was in order and moved to formally request City staff to draft an ordinance prohibiting Councilmembers leaving the Council from entering into a I c, 7 City of Denton City Council Minutes AgondaNo• ~.2 December 10, 1991 Agenda item_ Page 3 L contract for goods or services with the City ofle, ntn for one year. Councilmember Mark Chew second the motion. The motion passed unanimously, seven to zero, 6. The Council received a report and held a discussion on procedures for citizens speaking at public hearings, City Manager Lloyd Harrell introduced the item and presented a sample of a "Request to speak Form" that is used by the County of Denton to identify and present individuals who wished to speak at public hearings, , Councilmembers stated that using the cards may make addressing the Council a more orderly process. The Mayor asked whether the cards would be ordered as presented to the City Secretary and staff. The City Manager stated that other communities ordered the cards on a first come, first speak basis. Councilmembers agreed on the format. The City Council gave their consensus to the use of a request-to-speak card. 7. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding student involvement in local government. City Manager Lloyd Harrell introduced the item and presented a summary of information collected by staff showing the involvement of students in the local city government of Texas cities with universities. Councilmembers discussed options ranging from an ex- officio position to a Council-appointed committee on student affairs. Concern was expressed over giving students a greater voice in the community than other citizens. Concern was also expressed over placing an ex- officio member on the council without having that individual elected by the citizens of Denton. The City Council agreed to meet in the future with student leaders from both the University of North Texas and Texas Woman's University to review and discuss issues of interest and importance to the student population. There being no further agenda items, the City Council adjourned. Bob Castleberry, Mayor City of Denton, Texas w L i~ M CITY COUNCIL TTT - I IT Tw M. X oooQaoaaaa r~oo~ OOOO t F ro ~OOOa L. , r d 1 • nOC~u CrlUriuu`~JO - h it t I Nonda No. j nllonda Ifom~ !5~ (2.~ ~ ~v Rile . CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. WKINNEY / DENTON, TEXA 7 2-I/ M E M O R A N D U M TO. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager ~ FROM: John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance DATE: January 16, 1992 SUBJECT: GENERAL OBLIGATION AND UTILITY REVENUE BONDS The $4.5 million in revenue bonds are being issued primarily for the upgrade of the sewer treatment plant. The General Obligation Bond Funds are to be utilized in the following manner: • $1.5 million are for street repair in conjunction with the 1986 Bond Election and CIP program • $9400000 is for drainage projects also associated with the 1986 Bond Election and CIP program. • $190,ooo is for bridge improvements that have been necessitated by the recent excessive rainfalls. If you have any questions, or need more specific information on these projects, please advise. AFF0013A C 8171566.6200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 t. l' Y' J U S! Aponda Mo. _1P_=ILT~,~ r Agonda Ilem q y ± tE?.~! R?le CITY of DENTON, TEXA8 MUNICIPAL BUILDING/ DENTON, TEXAS 76201 /TELEPHONE (817 566.8200 OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES MUKORANDUM w DATE; January 15, 1992 TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City ",'onager FROM: R. E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities RE: Utility Revenue Bonds At the Public Utilities Board meeting on Wednesday, January 15, 1992,-the Board approved the sale of $9.5 million in revenue bonds to be used by the Wastewater Utility In upgrading the Pecan Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. The Minutes of this action are attached. Respectfully, R. Nelson, Executive Director Department of Utilities Attachment; Minutes PUB Meeting of January 15, 1992 t TJEDx CAVED 'S'O konda No, ._l04 _s! r~ Agnnda Ilom~p 'r 4 0ale Excerpt R Minutes Public Utilities Board January 15, 1992 11. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF FISCAL YEAR 1992 WASTEWATER BOND SALE. Nelson explained that, in order to meet the financial requirements of the Wastewater Treatment Plant updates just approved by the Board, plus 4 construction activity, the Wastewater Utility needs $4.5 million added to the $2 million nova in the bond fund, This will take the Department to Spring 1993. The City is going out for a bond issue of $5 million and the Utility Department would like to add on $4.5 million In bond sales to this issue. This would lower costs of handling bond sale, plus the utility will! get better interest rates. The Board asked if it would be possible for tLe city to consider making some of the bonds available locally in denominations smaller than $5,000. Nelson replied that this has been done in some other cities, but not in Denton. The Board requested this option be considered in any future bond issues, Hardin indicated that the underwriter will generally do this if the request Is made. Coplen stated the option is worth considering Lanny made a motion to recommend to the City Council approval of a $4.5 million Wastewater Utility bond issue. Second by Frady. All ayes, no nays, motion carried. r ,j Agenda No. AQonda Ifon:-&~ rr CERTIFICATE FOR J ~Q ORDINANCE DIRECTING THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTE ION TO ISSUE CITY OF DENTON UTILITY SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, AND DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE AND PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF SALE OF SAID BONDS THE STATE OF TEXAS ; COUNTY OF DENTON CITY OF DENTON We, the undersigned officers of said city, hereby certify as follows: 1. The City council of said City convened in REGULAR MEETING ON THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 1992, at the Municipal Building (City Hall), and the roll was called of the duly constitutad officers and members of said City Council, to-wit; Jennifer K. Walters, City Secretary Bob Castleberry, Mayor Mark chew John Trent Jane Hopkins Jim Alexander Harold Perry Margaret Smith and all of said persons were present, except the following absentees: thus constituting a quorum. whereupon, among other business, the following was transacted at said Meeting: a written ORDINANCE DIRECTING THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CITY OF DENTON UTILITY SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, AND DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE AND PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF SALE OF SAID BONDS was duly introduced for the consideration of said city council and duly read. It was then duly moved and seconded that said Ordinance be passed; and, after due discussion, said motion, carrying with it the passage of said Ordinance, prevailed and carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENTIONS: 2. That a true, full, and correct copy of the aforesaid Ordinance passed at the Meeting described in the above and foregoing paragraph is attached to and follows this ~S r 4onda No. Agwida Ram- ihto 1-°AL.9.e2----45~ certificate; that said ordinance has been duly recorded city council's minutes of said Meeting; that the above and foregoing paragraph is a true, full, and correct excerpt from said City council's minutes of said Meeting pertaining to the passage of said Ordinances that the persons named in the above and foregoing paragraph are the duly chosen, qualified, and acting officers and members of said City Council as indicated thereint and that each of the officers and members of said city council was duly and sufficiently notified officially and per- sonally, in advance, of the time, place, and purpose of the aforesaid Maeating, and that said Ordinance would be introduced and considered f5• passage at said Meeting; and that said Meeting was open ;,o the public, and public notice of the time, place, and puipuse of said meeting was given, all as required by Vernon's ..nn. Tex. Civ. St. Article 6252-17. p 3. That the Mayor of said City has approved, and hereby approves, the aforesaid ordinancet that the Mayor and the city Secretary of said City have duly signed said ordinance; and that the Mayor and the City Secretary of said city hereby declare that their signing of this certificate shall constitute the signing of the attached and following copy of said ordi- nance for all purposes. SIGNED AhD SEALED as of the 21st day of January, 1992. City Secretary Mayor (SEAL) We, the undersigned, being respectively the City Attorney and the Bond Attorneys of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby certify that we pr(ipared and approved as to legality the attached and following ordinance prior to its passage as aforesaid. City Attorney Bond Attorneys v r. i Nowfa No. __~,2 -,gyp 2~ Aganda I ~~?1 ~9~ ORDINANCE N0.92 - r -4r ~O ORDINANCE DIRECTING THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTEN ION TO ISSUE CITY OF DENTON UTILITY SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, AND DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE AND PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF SALE OF SAID BONDS THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON ° CITY OF DENTON WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, deems it necessary and advisable that the bonds hereinafter R+ described be authorized, issued, sold, and delivered. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON ORDAINS; Sertlon 1. That the city secretary is directed to cause the following notice to be published in the "Denton Record- Chronicle", which is a newspaper published in, and having general circulation in, the City of Denton, on the same day of each of two consecutive weeks, with the date of the first publication to be on or before February 17, 1992, being at least fifteen (15 days) prior to the date upon which the city council intends to pass the Ordinance described in the following notice: "NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CITY OF DENTON UTILITY SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1992 Notice is hereby given, in accordance with Article 2368a, Vernon's Annotated Texas Civil Statutes, that the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, intends to pass, at a Regular Meeting to be held commencing at 7:00 p.m., on March 3, 1992, at the Municipal Building (City Hall), an Ordinance authorizing the issuance, sale, and delivery of an issue of bonds, to be evidenced initially by a single fully registered bond payable in installments, but convertible into definitive bonds in multiples of $5,000, to be dectgnated as "City of Denton Utility System Revenue Bonds, Serie-- 199211, in the maximum principal amount of $41500,000, to be secured by and payable from a first lien on and pledge of the "Pledged Revenues", which "Pledged Revenues" include initia117 the "Net Revenues" of the "System", with said "System" initially consisting of the City's entire existing combined waterworks, sanitary sewer, and electric light and power system, all as will be defined and provided in the aforesaid Ordinance. Said bonds will bear interest from their date at maximum rates not to exceed fifteen percentum per annum, will be scheduled to mature serially in Aganrla No. f Aganda Itam-'35-~-k 1 9" (o installments within a maximum of not to exceed thirty year from their date, and will be subject to redemption prior to maturity, and will have such other and further characteristics, as will be provided in the aforesaid ordinance. Said bonds will be authorized, issued, sold and delivered pursuant to Articles 1111b, 1112, 1113, and 1114, Vernon's Annotated Texas Civil Statutes, and other applicable laws, for the purpose of obtaining money for improvements and extensions of the afore- said "System". e CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS" Section 2. That the City Secretary is directed to issue a Notice of Sale of Bonds in substantially the following form: OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS UTILITY SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1992 The City Council of the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, will receive sealed bids at the Municipal Building (City Hall), 215 E. McKinney Street, in the City of Denton until: 7:00 p.m., Tuesday, March 3, 1992 for the purchase of: S40500,000 Utility, System Revenue H ds, Ser s 1992, to be dated March 1, 1992, and to mature serially December 1 each year 1995 through 2014. Sealed bids, plainly marked "Bid for Bonds", should be addressed to "Honorable Mayor and City council, City of Denton, Texas", and must be submitted on the "Official Bid Form" to be made available by the city council prior the date of sale. All sealed bids will be publicly opened and tabu- lated before the council. Copies of the "Official Statement", "Notice of Sale", and "Official Bid Form" are being prepared and will be mailed to prospective bidders on or about February 18, 1992, and will be furnished to any prospective bidder upon request, by First Southwest Company, 500 First City Center, 1700 Pacific Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75201, Financial Advisors luo the City. The City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any and all irregularities. By order of the city Council of the City of Denton, Texas. JENNIFER K. WALTERS City Secretary City of Denton, Texas. Said Notice shall be published once in The Bond Buyer, New , York, New York, which is a national publication regularly and primarily carrying financial news and municipal bond sale "Denton j Reand sid Notice also cord-Chronicle", which shall has b been published designated as in he e Odle to the ublications shall be newspaer of atl least Denton. Said for receiving bids. Aponda M AgontlaItem j~ffi;__.. NIB K ,+Oonda Nu.._LC °0 TOT 4 Agcnwla amlL L_~l_ LLt18 J- 2Z- pj /o NOTICE OF INTENTION if TO ISSUE CITY OF DENTON UTILITY U SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS Notice is hereby given,-in accordance with Article 2368a, Vernon's Annotated Texas Civil Statutes, that the City council of the City of Denton, Texas, intends to pass, at a Regular Meeting to be held commencing at 7:00 p.m., on March 3, 1992, at the Municipal Building (City Hall), an Ordinance authorizing the issuance, sale, and delivery of an issue of bonds, to be evidenced initially by a single fully registered bond payable in installments, but convertible into definitive bonds in multiples of $5,000, to be designated as "City of Denton Utility System Revenue Bonds, Seriea 299211, in the maximum principal amount of $4,500,000, to be secured by and payable from a first lien on and pledge of the "Pledged Revenues", which "Pledged Revenues" include initially the "Net Revenues" of the "Systemtl, with said "System" initially consisting of the City's entire existing combined waterworks, sanitary sewer, and electric light and power system, all as will be defined and provided in the aforesaid Ordinance. Said bonds will bear interest from their date at maximum rates not to exceed fifteen percentum per annum, will be sched- uled to mature serially in installments within a maximum of not to exceed thirty years from their date, and will be subject to redemption prior to maturity, and will have such other and further characteristics, as will be pro- vided in the aforesaid Ordinance. Said bonds will be authorized, issued, sold and delivered pursuant to Arti- cles llllb, 1112, 2113, and 1114, Vernon's Annotated Texas Civil statutes, and other applicable laws, for the purpose of obtaining money for improvements and extensions of the aforesaid "System". CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS C 1i tk l~enda1)o ApnnU~ Ilnm__L~J .fa ~f.~ ~ OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE O:Ite ,2 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS UTILITY SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1992 The City Council of the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, will receive sealed bids at the Municipal Building (City Hall), 215 E. McKinney Street, in the City of Denton until: F 7:00 p.m., Tuesday, March 3, 1992 for the purchase of: $4.500,000 Utility System Revenue Bonds, Series 1992, s to be dated March 1, 1992, and to mature serially December 1 each year 1995 though 2014. Sealed bids, plainly marked ,Bid for Bonds", should be addressed to "Honorable Mayor and City Council, City of Denton, TexasO~, and must be submitted on the "Official Bid Form" to be made available by the City Council prior the date of sale. All sealed bids will be publicly opened and tabu- lated before the Council. copies of the "Official Statement", "Notice of Sale", and "Official Bid Form" are being prepared and will be mailed to prospective bidders on or about February 18, 1992, and will be furnished to any prospective bidder upon request, by First Southwest Company, 500 First City Center, 1700 Pacific Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75201, Financial Advisors to the City. The City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any and all irregularities. By order of the city Council of the City of Denton, Texas. JENNIFER K. WALTERS City Secretary City of Denton, Texas. C S Y Is #C r r Y COUNCIL 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4441 -H q mm O oooO~ODUO ~y~oooOO -1 p0It % MMM o°u a_ o° ~oQOO~~~~QC .44 Qu - u. s 7w ;f • dgonUa No..__! C Ayonda Itarn_ a pp_6194 ~.J 11 CERTIFICATE FOR /J f ' ORDINANCE DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE AND PUBLICATC: OF NOTICE OF SALE OF CITY OF DENTON GENERAL OBLIGATION BOM S THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON CITY OF DENTON We, the undersigned officers of said City, hereby certify as follows: 1. The city council of said City convened in REGULAR MEETING ON THE 21st DAY OF JANUARY, 1992, v at the Municipal Building (City Hall), and the roll was called of the duly constituted officers and members of said City Council, to-wit: Jennifer K. Walters, City secretary Bob Castleberry, Mayor Mark Chew Jane Hopkins Jim Alexander Harold Perry Margaret smith and all of said persons were present, except the following absentees: thus constituting a quorum. Whereupon, among other business, the following was transacted at said Meeting: a written ORDINANCE DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE AND PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF SALE OF CITY OF DENTON GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS was duly introduced for the consideration of said City council and duly read. It was then duly moved and seconded that said ordinance be passed; and, after due discussion, said motion, carrying with it the passage of said ordinance, prevailed and carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTENTIONS: 2. That a true, full, and correct copy of the aforesaid ordinance passed at the Meeting described in the above and foregoing paragraph is attached to and follows this certifi- cate; that said Ordinance has been duly recorded in said City Council's minutes of said Meeting; that the above and foregoing paragraph is a true, full, and correct excerpt from said City Council's minutes of said Meeting pertaining to the passage of t 1 Y J R 1 44 tl laonda No. Agooda,Itam 4 said ordinance; that the persons named in the above and fore z going paragraph are the duly chosen, qualified, and acting l/ officers and members of said City Council as indicated therein; and that each of the officers and members of said City Council was duly and sufficiently notified officially and personally, in advance, of the time, place, and purpose of the aforesaid Meeting, and that said Ordinance would be introduced and considered for passage at said Meeting; and that said Meeting was open to the public, and public notice of the time, place, and purpose of said meeting was given, all as required by Vernon's Ann. Tex. Civ, St. Article 6252-17. 3. That the Mayor of said city has approved, and hereby approves, the aforesaid Ordinances that the Mayor and the City secretary of said City have duly signed said ordinances and ad that the Mayor and the City Secretary of said city hereby declare that their signing of this Certificate shall constitute the signing of the attached and following copy of said ordi- nance for all purposes. SIGNED AND SEALED the 21st day of January, 1992. city Secretary Mayor (SEAL) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - We, the undersigned, being respectively thn City Attorney and the Bond Attorneys of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby certify that we prepared and approved as to legality the attached and following ordinance prior to its passage as aforesaid. City Attorney Bon Attorneys C { . l.F f~ Z. C: r Iti{IOnda No, _-~L D z ` ORDINANCE NO. 92 - Agenda Item. S _~6J ORDINANCE DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE AND PUBLICATION OF NOTICE' / fit- ~54L OF SALE OF CITY OF DENTON GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON CITY OF DENTON THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: S 1. That the City Secretary is directed to issue a Notice of Sale of Bonds in substantially the following form: OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS $2,630,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 1992 The City Council of the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, will receive sealed bids at the Municipal Building, 215 E. McKinney Street, in the City of Denton until: 7:00 p,m., C.S.T., Tuesday, March 3, 1992 for the purchase of; 82,630.000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 199,?., to be dated March 1, 1992, and to mature serially July 1 each year 1994 through 2012, Sealed bids, plainly marked "Bid for Bon's", should be addressed to "Honorable Mayor and City Council, City of Denton, Texas", and must be submitted on the "Official Bid Form" to be made available by the City Council prior to the date of sale. All sealed bids will be publicly opened and tabulated before the Council. Copies of the "Official Statement", "Notice of Sale", and "Official Bid Form" are being prepared and will be mailed to prospective bidders on or about February 18, 1992, and will be furnished to any prospective bidder upon request, by First Southwest Company, 500 First City Center, 1700 Pacific Ave„ Dallas, Texas 75201, Financial Advisor to the City. The City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any and all irregularities. By order of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas. JENNIFER K. WALTERS City Secretary City of Denton, Texas. i 2, That said Notice shall be published once in The Bond Buyer, New York, New York, which is a national publication regularly and primarily carrying financial news and municipal bond sale notices; and said Notice also shall be published once in the "Denton Record-Chronicle", which has been designated as the official newspaper of the City of Denton. Said publications shall be made at least thirty days prior to the day set for receiving bids. Agenda No. Agenda Ilemd Rile /7 c~ • r f'. i Z Agenda No. -002. Agenda Itom.roe d OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS / Y $2,630,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 1992 The City Council of the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, will receive sealed bids at the Municipal Building, 215 E, McKinney Street, in the City of Denton until: 7:00 p.m., C.S.T., Tuesday, March 3, 1992 for the purchase of: 52.630 000 General Obli Ation Bonds Series 199 to be dated March 1, 1992, and to mature serially July 1 each year 1994 through 2012. Sealed bids, plainly marked "Bid for Bonds", should be addressed to "Vonoeable Mayor and City Council, City of Denton, Texas", and must be submitted on the "Official Bid Form" to be made available by the City Council prior to the date of sale. All sealed bids will be publicly opened and tabulated before the council. Copies of the "Official Statement", "Notice of Sale", and "Official Bid Form" are being prepared and will be mailed to prospective bidders on or about February 18, 1992, and will be furnished to any prospective bidder upon request, by First Southwest Company, 500 First City Center, 1700 Pacific Ave., Dallas, Texas 75201, Financial Advisor to the City, The City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any and all irregularities, a By order of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, ► JENNIFER K. WALTERS City Secretary City of Denton, Texas. l C, 4 i vs 3 CITY COUNCIL r :XT t a oooo°°°oaaa oaF°aOOOOD ~U q O p Q Ot7~ F q ~°°~000oacaccoo°°°°°° r ~ 4✓ e !i ~i i t IT Agonda Nn, Argwida ILr;m F5 /A -„A The Mayor and Members of the City Council TO: FROM: Joe Thompson, Airport Manager DATE: January 16, 1992 SUBJECT: Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Participation This Priority Request was asked for by the Federal Aviation 1110 Administration in a letter to Mayor Bob Castleberry on December 11, 1991, The request was made so that the City of Denton could meet Part 23 of the Department of Transportation Regulations involving substantial amounts of Federal Funds to encourage Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) participation. It is mandatory that a DBE Program be approved prior to the issuance of any Grants. The City of Dento:t has been notified that two (2) Grants from the Federal Aviation Administration are pending approval (see attachments "A" and "B"). C Ina .,..i i3 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Agonda No.. TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Apanddlle°1- Rite _ FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager ~y ~fZ SUBJECT: Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Participation (f;{ 7 RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Airport Staff and Airport Advisory Board to implement a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program in order to meet Federal Aviation Administration Grant Requirements. SUMMARY: There will be no cost to the City of Denton. BACKGROUND: This will meet the Federal Department of Transportation Requirements that the Federal Aviation Administration has to use in order to issue Federal Grants. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: This agreement will be administered by the Purchasing Department for bidding of contracts and may be used by other Departments to receive Federal or State Grants, FISCAL IMPACT: This will place Denton in a more positive position to receive Federal or State Grants. Respec ully submitted: Loyd V. Harrell Prepared by: City Manager Joe Thompson, Air ort Manager Approved: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager C C x r r t Q~ Attachment "A' Aoanda No, ~QQ2 Agenda Ilom- SID ihv,es1 Rog an Fart ~Noith, Texas W93-0000 LJ S. Department 6 of Transportation nsas ~uu51ara FT y?w h1ex~CO Ok1al'orr4 Federal Aviation Teas Administration December 11, 1991 The Honorable Bob Castleberry Mayor of Denton 215 East McKinney Street o Denton, TX 76201 Dear Mayor Castleberry: Part 23 of the Department of Transportation Regulations requires sponsors of airport projects involving substantial amounts of Federal funds under the Airport Improvement Program to have procedures for encouraging disadvantaged business participation. Since you have requested Federal financial assistance for a new airport, we encourage you to develop an acceptable Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program at this time. The Denton Municipal Airport is considered a likely candidate for a project in Fiscal Year 1992. It is mandatory that a DBE Program be approved prior to issuance of a grant. Enclosed is a development kit to use in developing your sDBE it program. When you have developed your program, please along with your DBE Program goal to: Civil Rights officer, Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Fort Worth, Texas 7ti193-0009 and send a copy of the cover letter only to this office, if you need assistance in preparing this document, please contact our Civil Rights officer at (817) 624-5009, This letter is not to be considered a commitment of Federal funds. Sincerely, 5fVd F Sto t Airport Program Specialist Texas Airport Development Office Enclosure C TOGETHER WE SUCCEED - .F - u Agenda No. 2 N Agenda limn. ~ CA316 el 2, CITY of DENTON, TEXAS PURCHASING DIVISION / 501.E TEXAS STREET / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 • M L M 0 R A N D V M Tot Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager 1 From: Melanie A. Harden, Buyer Date: January 17, 1992 SUBJECT: D B E PROGRAM Purchasing has reviewed the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise program to be implemented after Council approval. We are prepared to keep and update the required DBE Directory and to include the required verbage in bid documents for items funded by the Federal Aviation Adminstration Grant. C 8171566,8311 DIFW METRO 2670042 1 s k y it r T ;t c wpd"s%dbe,r i Ayonda No. AoVda Item , RESOLUTION NO. Wo j- ~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ADOPTING A NEW DISA22 A TAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM FOR THE DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Federal Air Administration has requested the City ` to up(.ute its Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program for the Denton Municipal Airport; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTIQI1. That the attached is adopted as the new Municipal Airport Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program for the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION II. That this resolution shall become effecive im- mediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY w BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY k BY!~ C 1 n l E4 iF W.,ALL000A8 Attachment AC60a No. L Agonda Ilom Ebte CITY OF QENTON, TEXAS AND MUNICIPAL AIRPORT ~f~.I DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM p 1. DBE DIRECTORY The City of Denton has compiled and will maintain and update a DBE Directory, which is located in the Purchasing Department, The State Department of Highways and Public Transportation Director will be used to supplement the City+s Directory. Directories of other agencies may be also be used when a project requires a search ' for DBEs beyond the normal recruiting areas, The City's Directory lists firms that are capable of performing general contracting and particular solicitations. The Directory is organized by type of work the contractor desires to perform, i,e., general construction, lighting, marking, engineering, etc. The Directory indicates which firms have passed the city's own certification process, those certified by the small Business Administration (SBA) under the Section 8(a) program, those certi- fied by the State Department of Transportation and some firms that do not have current certification. The following information is shown for each firm; 1. Company Name 2. Type of Contractor 3, Address 4, Telephone Number 5. Owned by Woman, Minority, or other DBE 6. Contact Person The incl det will udate the DBEs Director certified duig that period. will in the event a bidder names other DBEs it desires to use, these firms will be included in the Directory if they can be certified. Other DBEs that desire to be listed will also be included, upon request. The Dior is made le to bidders and efforrtseto meet the DBEagoalsbestablished byte Ci y of Dent nhand made a part of bid specifications, The Directory is a primary source for locating potential DBE contractors. 1 i Y, w • ~r Agana Pao. e•_ - Agooda Ilam - Sources of Information Listed below are sources of information the sponsor may use to c m- pile and update its directory: 1. state and local directories. 2. organizations funded by the Minority Business Development Agency (MBDA) of the Department of Commerce. 3. Local and regional offices of the Small Business Administration. 4. National Minority Supplier Development Counsel DBE Data Bank. II. Proa@,.dures to Aeoertain the Eligibility of DBEs and Joint Ventures Involving DBEs The City of Denton will certify the eligibility of DBEs and joint ventures involving DBEs that are named by competitors for FAA- assisted contracts to be let by the City. The City may also accept the certifications made by other DoT recipients. The City of Denton requires prime contractors to make good faith efforts to replace a DBE subcontractor that is unable to perform the contract successfully with another DBE. Substitutions of DBE subcontractors after bid opening and during contract performance must be approved by the City of Denton. In these instances, the City of Denton verifies the eligibility of the substitute firm. Any business that desires to participate as a DBE will be required to complete and submit schedule A (Appendix 1) to the City of Denton. Any business that desires to participate as a joint ven- ture DBE will, in addition, be required to complete Schedule B (Appendix 2). The schedules must be signed and notarized by the authorized representative of the business. The required Schedule must accompany the DBE participation informa- tion submitted to the City of Denton by competitors. A firm seeking certification as a DBE will not be required to sub- mit schedule A or B if either of the following applies: 1. The potential DBE corizactot states in writing that it has sub- mitted the same information to or has been certified by the City of Denton, any DOT element, or other Federal agency that uses essentially the same definition and ownership and control criteria as the DOT. In this case, the potential DBE must ob- tain the information and certification (if made) from the other agency and submit it to the City) or C Page 2 1 ti ~t Agonda No. Aponda Itom 2. The potential DBE contractor has been determined by the Sma21 Business Administration to be owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals under section 8(a) of the Small Business Act, as amended. (See page 5 regarding information that 8(a) firms are required to provide.) zzz. Uniform certification standards The City of Denton will take at least the following steps in deter- mining whether a firm may be certified as a DBE: 1. Perform an on-site visit to the offices of the firm and to any job sites on which the firm is working at the time of the eligi- bility investigation.' 2. Obtain the resumes or work histories of the principal owners of the firm and personally interview these individuals. 3. Analyze the ownership of stock in the firm, if it is a cor- poration. 4. Analyze the bonding and financial capacity of the firm. 5. Determine the work history of the firm, including contracts it has received and work it has completed. 1 On-site Certification Visits Per guidance from the FAA, office and job site visits may be omitted from the investigation in any of these situations: 1. When the City, at its discretion, accepts the certification of another DOT recipient, which included visits conforming to the regulations. 2. When the City obtains the report of a site visit completed by another DOT recipient, which the City relies on. A firm applying for certification may be required to supply such re- port or cause the other recipient to supply it. The City will then draw its own conclusions regarding eligibility. 3. When the City recertifies a firm that ?.s previously reviewed on-site, and eligibility issues (e.g., change in owner.hip) have not arisen that make a second visit necessary. In the absence of such issues, an on-site visit need be conducted only once. Page 3 t~ N 4 } i !1 i FI !a j Agenda Item, n.S-_. w1f, 6. obtain or compile a list of equipment owned or available t rh firm and the licenses of the firm and its key personnel to perform the work it seeks to do as part of the DBE program; and 7. obtain a statement from the firm of the type of work it prefers to perform as part of the DBE program. Decertification Procedures Whenever the City of Denton comes to believe that a firm with a current certification is no longer eligible, the firm will be afforded the rudiments of due process prior to revoking its eli- gibility. The steps to be used are: 1. A letter will be sent to the firm, stating that the City is contemplating decertification. A brief description of the reasons for the proposed action will be included. 2. The firm will be given an opportunity to respond in person and in writing to present information and arguments. An informal meeting or hearing may be part of the process, but a fo.,,mal adversary proceeding will not be used. While these procedures are not a regulatory requirement, the DOT has recommended them to make the process fair and to prevent un- necessary procedural litigation. IV. DBE DEFINITION To qualify for certification, a firm must meet the definition of a disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE). The definition used by , the City of Denton is as follows: A small business concerns 1. Which is at least 51 percent owned by one or more socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, or, in the case of any publicly owned business, at least 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more socially and economically dis- advantaged individualst and 2. Whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more of the socially and economically disadvantaged individuals who own it. C Page 4 c s ii Nonda No. 9vL rl~d 2 _ Agenrtallcm~_~ Determinations of BUS?,~,ess Size ~1o The first step in the r.-ertffication process is to make a ter urination of business size. If the applicant is not a "small business concern," as defined below, it will not be certified by the City of Denton, even though it may be owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals and eligible in all other respects. Even a firm certified by the small Business Administration (SBA) under the 8(a) program is not eligible if it is not small. 1. The size standards established by the SBA in 13 CFR Part 121, as revised on May 25, 1988, are used for making size deter- minations, 2. However, no firm is considered small if, including its affil- iates, it averages annual gross receipts in excess of $14 million over the previous three fiscal years (Section 505(d) (2), Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, as Amended). Thus, a general contractor must "graduate" from the program once its gross receipts exceed the $14 million ceiling, even though the SBA standard for general contractors is $17 million. 3. Contractors are still subject to applicable lower limits established by the SBA. For example, the SBA size limit for electrical contractors is $7 million (average of annual gross receipts for three-year period). The $7 million limit, rather than the $14 million ceiling, governs in size determinations of these contractors. xThe Department has stated that the $14 million limit for small business concerns, which is discussed below, applies to Section 8(a) firms. Sponsors have the authority and obligation to require a section 8(a) firm applying for certification or recertification to submit financial figures indicating it3 average annual gross receipts for the three years prior to the date of the application. If a firm has earned gross receipts in excess of the $14 million standard, the firm must be denied certification or decertified by the sponsor. A firm that refuses to supply information to enable the sponsor to make this determination may be either denied certification or decertified by the sponsor. Neither the DOT nor a sponsor may require a section 8(a) firm to submit other eligibility information, including any pertaining to ownership and control, or social and economic disadvantage. A sponsor who believes that the Section 8(a) status of a firm is questionable should communicate the information to the Small Business Administration, which is solely empowered to grant or revoke 8(a) certifications. Page 5 - 1. ~~enda Pfd, _ 4. For ATP-funded subcontracts of $1(1,000 or. less, a firm s s all under the SBA regulation: if, inc]ttd.ing its affiliates, it has no more than 500 employees. 5. For AIP-funded subcontracts over $3.0,000 acid prime contracts, a firm is small under the SJM rc.qulahions if, including its affiliates, it meets the applicable standard in terms of average gross receipts, number of employees, or other measure. While for many of the businesses used in ATP projects, the SBA standard is measured in gross receipts, this may not always be so. For example, a manufacturer of concrete products (SIC 3272) is small if it has no more than 500 employees. If one of these businesses earns gross receipts in excess of the $14 million cap, it would not qualify as small and hence for eligibility as a DBE, even though it may have less than 500 employees. 6. All affiliates of a firm, as well as the firm itself, are con- sidered when determining gross receipts earned or number of persons employed. Affiliation exists if one firm r.ontrols or has the power to control the other, or a third party or parties controls or has the power to control both firms. 7. Information on gross receipts earned by an applicant is obtained from its submission of Schedule A (Appendix 1). 8. If a firm applies for certification in more than one category (e.g., general construction and special trade subcontractor), the applicable SBA standard is the one that describes the work the firm will perform under the AIP-funded contract. 9. Size determinations will be reviewed annually in connection with the recertification process. Socially and Economically _Disadvantaged Individuals 1. Any person having a current 8(a) certification from the Small Business Administration is considered to be socially and economically disadvantaged. 2. The City of Denton makes a "rebuttable presumption" that individuals in the following groups who are citizens of the United States (or lawfully permanent residents) are socially and economically disadvantaged; a. Wo e 7 b. B1acl:Ameri ans, which includes persons having origins in any of the Black racial groups of Africa; Page 6 0 v. - s 6gerlda No, - Ageoda Iler»_ Date _1-A 77- c, is a is Amer ca s, which includes persons of Mexica , puert American, or culture Spanish or RicanI Cuba p Cen r or originthr regardless of orace; Portuguese d, INati ndians, Eskimos, Aleuts,lorlNativeeHawaiians; are American e. Asian-Pacific Americans, which includes persons whose origins 4 are from Japan, China, Taiwan, Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, the Philippines, Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Trust Territories of the Pacific, and the Northern Marianas; and f, Asian-Indian Americans, which includes persons whose origins are from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka. The City of Denton will generally assume that business owners who fall into one of these groups are socially and economically disadvantaged. Their disadvantaged status challenge will not generally be investigated, unless a third-party 3. Other individuals may be found to be socially and economically or p athedisabled male,example, disadvantaged on a case-by-case basis. Vietnam veteran, an Appalachian may claim to be disadvantaged. If such individual requests that his or her firm be certified as a DBE, the city of Denton, as part of the certification process, will determine whether the individual is socially and economically disadvantaged under the SBA regulations. These owners must demonstrate that their disadvantaged status arose from individual circumstances, rather than by virtue of membership in a group. ChaIIenae Procedures Any third party may present evidence challenging whether a firm's owners who are presumed ho be socially and economically disadvan- taged are truly disadvantaged. individuals 3certified as 8(a), ever, are not subject to these challenges. When the City of Denton receives a wri•eten challenge to the dis- advantaged status of a business owner that is certified or seeking alsoo initiateian ins certi ec nomicadisadvantage. The willCity makeitasedeftemayrminati quirt'. 3If a challenge is made to the owners of an 8(a) firm, the sponsor should refer indicated o information eSor question to the SBA for, resolution, i Page 7 ;a Agenda No. _ ~j'--~--- Apenda I1em_ _ Coto The guidelines in 49 CFR 23.69 anl. Appendix C will be us d for these actions. The procedures are informal; strict rules of evidence do not apply. While a challenge is in progress, the presumption of social and d if disadvantage continues, anthe firm has been certi- fied, it will continue to be eligible as a DBE. E1 standards r The City of Denton will use the following standards to determine whether a firm is owned and controlled by one or more socially and economically disadvantaged individuals. of socially and economically' 1. Barra fide membership in a group he or she is established on ofhsuchsgroup diBadvataged the applicant individuals must be the app r and is so regarded by that particular disadvantaged community. However, the City of Denton is not required to accept the claim if it is determined to be invalid. Proof of ancestry alone is not o clusiv ically evidencedis of member- ship in a group of socially and ecoadvantaged r or individuals. The fact a person's groups gdoens dfatheot necE ssarily relative belonged to one licant as a member for purposes of DBE qualify the app certification. If the individual has not held himself or herself out to be a member of the community of disadvantaged individuals, as not acted as a member of that population communityt large as a membertoftthe grouby persons in the pop for purposesnofdDBEdceas belonging rtification. group, the individual disadvantaged group roup 2, An eligible DBE must be an independent business. The ownership and control by disadvantaged persons must oro be f realorma, subownerstantishipal, of and continuing and must go beyond ons The the firm as reflected mus in it the oust maryoincidents f ownes- advantaged owners must enjoy ship and must share in the risks and profits commensurate with their ownership interests, as demonstrated by an examination o the substance rather than form of arrangements. Recognition of Dees the business as a separate sufficeentitfororo ogni ionpasaaDBEur.Tn is not necessarily y otential DBE is an independent ~ncludigg determining whether a p the City of Denton considers all relevantthea adequacy of its the date the business was established, with non resources for the work of the contract, relatio ships degree - financial, equipment leasing, and othe. DBE firms vary from industry p" Page S c, 'h ~i IC Agenda No. F; Aooiida Row ~ pale _ _ ~41 3. The disadvantaged owners must also possess the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and day-to-day, well as major decisions on matters of management, policy, and operations. The firm must not be subject to any formal or in- formal restrictions which limit the customary discretion of the disadvantaged owners. There must n be restrictions ip through, for example, bylaw provisions, par agreements, or charter requirements for cumulative voting rights or otherwise , that prevent the disadvantaged owners, without the cooperation or vote of any owner who is not socially and racotom'.. 11y disadvantaged, from making a business decision of th6 ,Ir.. 4. If the owners of the firm who are not socially and economkca °.ly disadvantaged individuals are tdisproportionately en othe p rfio is notrc,-',n, le for. the operation of the firm, by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals and is not eligible. Where the actual management of the firm is contracted out to individuals other than the owner, the persons having the ultimate power to hire and fire the managers are considered as controlling the business. 5. All securities which constitute ownership and/or control of a corporation for purposes of establishing it as a DOE must be held directly by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals. No securities held in trust, or by any guardian and for a minor, shall be considered as held by socially economically disadvantaged Individuals in determining the ownership or control )f a corporation. 6. The contributions of capital or expertise by the socially and economically disadvantaged individuals to acquire their itaterests in the firm shall be real and substantial. Examples cf insufficient contributions include a promise to contribute capital, a note payable to the firm or its owners who are not socially &nd economically disadvantaged, or the mere partici- pation as an employee, rather than as a manager. 7. In addition to the above stanQards, special consideration is given to the following circumstances: a. Newly formed firms and firms whose ownership and/or control has changed since the date of the advertisement of the DOT- oro dh ng iin the reaions d focontract are r the timing l of athe scrutinized firm. b. A previous and/or continuing employer-employee relationship between or among present owners is carefully reviewed to ensur that the and capabilities, as~~ employee-owner management responsi- bilities ~ ` Page 9 5'. Agenda No Agonda Item. - 1. r 7~4 c. Any relationship between a DBE and a non-DBE which has a interest in the DBE is carefully reviewed to determine if the interest of the non-DBE conflitks with the requirements for ownership and control. 8. A joint venture will be certified if the DBE partner of the joint venture meets the eligibility standards, is responsible for a clearly defined portion of the work to be performed, and a shares in the ownership, control, management responsibilities, risks, and profits of the joint venture. 9. A joint venture is eligible to compete in a DBE set-aside if the DBE partner of the joint venture meets the eligibility 64/ standards; the DBE partner's share in the ownership, control, management responsibilities, risks, and profits of the joint venture is at least 51 percent; and the DBE partner is responsible for a clearly defined portion of the work to be performed. 10. A business applying for certification as a DBE or as a joint venture DBE must cooperate with the City of Denton in supplying any additional information which may be requested in order to make a determination. For example, the applicant may be required to provide income tax statements, 11. The City of Denton safeguards from disclosure to unauthorized persons information that reasonably may be regarded as con- fidential business information, consistent with Federal, state, and local law. 12, once certified, a DBE will be required to update its submission annually by submitting a new Schedule A or certifying that the Schedule A on file is still accurate. Firms are notified upon certification that a new schedule A must be submitted whenever there is a change in the firm's ownership or control. 13. The denial of certification by the City of Denton is final for the particular contract and any other contracts being let at the time of the denial (except when the Department of Trans- portation reverses the denial, following an appeal), Firms denied certification may correct deficiencies in their owner- ship and control and reapply for certification only for future contracts. Page 10 i` A 1 Agenda No..1 _ Agenda Itom-w-~_ Chle V. Percentage Goals for the Dollar V lue of the Work to be Awarded to DBEs Establis in the Overall Goal The program must contain a single overall goal for the use of DBEs in AIP-funded contracting, together with a description of the meth- odology employed in establishing i,t. (Appendix 4 contains a sample methodology.) The following guidelines apply when establishing the overall goal: 1. Make a nrolection of the work to be accomplished during the goal period on all AIP-funded contracts (excluding purchases of land) and estimate the cost of the work items in each. Whenever possible, an engineer's estimate of the costs should be provided. The overall goal may cover a one-year period or may be set for a particular grant, project, or group of grants and/or projects. Whichever method is used, the goal must be updated annually. The overall goal and the base from which the goal is calculated must reflect both construction and nonconstruction contracts funded by the ATP. Eligible nonconstruction includes funding for archi- tectural, engineering, planning consultants, and other professional services, purchase of vehicles and equipment (e.g., snow plows, crash/fire/rescue vehicles) and supplies. While contracts to purchase land are excluded from the goal-setting process, all other contracts let under land acquisition projects, such as for real estate survey and appraisal, are included. Funds received under the AIP for work that is accomplished by the sponsor's own employees or the employees of another public agency ("force account") are excluded from consideration. other costs that are not contracted (e.g., for administration and advertising) should also be excluded. 2. Select he geographical area(s) to be used in seeking DBEs for the work to be accomplished. Sponsors and their contractors must, as a minimum, seek DBEs in the same geographical area in which they seek contractors or sub- contractors generally for a given solicitation. The relevant geographical area may vary depending on the contract. For example, if a sponsor advertises for general contractors in a 5-county area to do a construction project, then the availability Page 1]. t~ 's AgOnda No. . Agor)da Ilom_ 4► Data 71 NP of DBEs for that project must be based on its search in the 5- county area. If the same sponsor uses a larger area, such as state-wide, to advertise for professional services, the DBE goal for these con- tracts must be based on its search on a state-wide basis. 3. Consult the Directory and other sources to determine the , availability of DBEs in the relevant geographical areas. Sponsors may consult, in addition to their own DBE directory, the directories or lists of State and local agencies, other DOT re- cipients, the Chamber of Commerce, the Small Business Administra- tion, the Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce, and other listings. These sources should provide a basis for determining the availability of DBEs in the relevant areas capable of performing the work of the contracts. 4. Tdentify potential for DBE participation Based on a review of the directories and prior accomplishments, sponsors should identify potential for DBEs to participate as prime or subcontractors in the ATP-funded projects during the goal period. The following factors should be considered: a. The number and types of contracts to be awarded and the number and types of DBEs likely to be available to compete for those contracts; and b. The past results of the sponsor's efforts to contract with DBEs and the reasons for the high or low level of those results. The above approach provides for practical r*oals that are related to the known availability of qualified DBEs. 5. Calculate the overall Goal The overall goal is determined by dividing the Federal share of potential awards to DBEs (dollar value) by the Federal share of all prime contract awards (dollar value) forecast for the goal period. Appendix 6 contains information on the Federal share. Federal Share of Potential DBE Awards Overall DBE = Goal Federal Share of All Prime Contract Awards Page 12 c~ ti v. x f5 w -i41 Adonda No, Aponda Ilom._ X5_2 Dale _/X in the example in Appendix A, the Federal share of all jech costs is 90%, and the calculation becomes: (90%) x $125,500 = $112,950 Overall DBE 13.9% Goal (90%) X $90,000 $810,000 If the overall goal does not represent an increase over the previous year's accomplishments, the sponsor must provide an ` explanation why an increase cannot reasonably be achieved.4 Sponsors should submit information for any additional AIP-fiinded work to be undertaken during the goal period for which estimates 4 are not available at the time of program submission. Potential for DBE participation should also be identified for these projects. A revised overall DBE goal will need to be submitted to the FAA for approval. Sponsors must also obtain approval prior to soliciting bids for these projects. (There is no exact formula that can be readily used to establish overall percentage goals. Sponsors who propose to use a formula should ensure that the availability of DBEs and the other factors contained in the regulation have been considered. The population of the minority community is only a very general guide to avail- ability, Goals adopted by other DOT recipients or other state or local agencies in the same geographical area may be a useful guide when contracting requirements are similar, Also, the history of FAA Regional data as broken down by state and various airports can serve as an excellent reference.) vx. Overall DBE Goal of Less than 10 Percent Sponsors who submit an overall DBE goal that is less than 10 per- cent must take the following steps in addition to those described in the previous pages. 1. The sponsor is required to submit a justification which pro- vides information on the following points: a. The sponsor's efforts to locate DBEs; b. The oponsor's efforts to make DBEs aware of contracting opportunities; 4sponsors submitting an overall goal of to percent or more should not include any of this information in their submission. C Page 13 c v Agenda Ilam__._Lti~lLL , c. The sponsor's initiatives to encourage and develop DBEs; d. Legal or other barriers impeding the participation of DBEs at a level of at least 10 percent in the sponsor's FAA- assisted contracts, and the sponsor's efforts to overcome or mitigate the effects of these barriers; e. The availability of MBEs to work on the sponsor's FAA- assisted co,;teacts; a f. The size and other characteristics of the minority popu- lation of the sponsor's jurisdiction, and the relevance of these factors to the availability or potential availability of the DBEs to work on the sponsor's FAA-assisted contracts; and g. A summary of the views and information concerning the availability of DBEs and the adequacy of the sponsor's efforts to increase DBE participation, as provided by persons and organizations consulted by the sponsor (see 3 below). 2. The sponsor must ensure that the request for the overall goal is signed or concurred in by the elected official, head of the board, or other official responsible for the operation of the airport sponsor. 3. The sponsor is required to consult with minority and general contractors' associations, community organizations, and other officials or organizations that could be expected to have information concerning the availability of DBEs and the adequacy of the sponsor's efforts to increase DBE partici- pation. A Notice Publishing the Overall Goal When the overall goal is submitted to the FAA, the sponsor is re- quired to publish a notice announcing that the proposed goal and methodology are available for inspection for a 30-day period at the sponsor's principal offices. The notice should state that comments will be accepted by the sponsor or the Department of Transportation for 45 days following publication. The notice sh<uld include ad- dresses where comments may be sent and should state that the com- ments are for informational purposes only. Sponsors should publish the notice in general circulation media and in any media of the disadvantaged community and trade associations. Page 14 r Agenda No. Agenda Item Past Year Accomplishments Date ~Tshculy When counting DBE participation toward the goals, sponsors exclude contracts for land, funds for force account, and other non- contractual work (as these same items are excluded when estab- lishing the goals). only the Federal share of AIP-funded contract awards may be applied toward the overall goal. These amounts are reported to the FAA on approved forms. For example, assume that the sponsor depicted in Appendix 4 awards contracts as shown below: (Actual Awards) w Project Items Amount DBE Professional Services 50,000 300000, Construction: 610,500 84,500 Equipment: 2500000 0 (Land)5 00 0001 0 Total 910,500 114,500 Achievement toward the overall goal is determined by dividing the Federal share of actual awards to DBEs (dollar value) by the Federal share of all prime contract awards (dollar value) made during the goal period. Achievements should reflect contract amendments, as well as awards. The Federal share of all project costs in this case is 90%. overall (90%) x 114,500 = 1030050 DBE Goal = = 12.6% Achievement (90%) x 910,500 - 819,450 Thus, the Federal share of contracts awarded to DBEs is $103,0501 while the Federal share of all prime contracts awarded is $819,450. Although an overall goal of 13.9% had been established (Appendix 4), the sponsor achieved 12.6% in actual DBE participation. Addi- tional information on counting DBE participation toward the goals is contained on pages 35 and 36. Updated Goal The overall goal must be reviewed at least annually. The review includes an analysis of projected versus actual DBE participation. An updated overall goal and methodology must be submitted to the FAA 30 days prior to the end of the goal period or when requested sLand is not counted toward the goals. Page 15 i` C r, f4 l , ~l Agooda No, _ Agonda Nom,. _ ._,_1 0018 by the Regional Civil Rights Officer. Appendix 4 contains a sa rl format for the update. Unless otherwise requested, only this in- formation, not the entire DBE program, should be submitted. An up- date is required even when the sponsor does not anticipate awarding any FAA-assisted contracts during the following 12-month period. If the sponsor's overall DBE goal expires and a new goal has not been approved, the sponsor may not issue further solicitations for AIP-funded contracts, including IFB's or RFP's, unless the FAA has + approved the specific contract goal or a new overall goal. Explanation for Failing to Meet Overall DBE Goal Sponsors who fail to achieve the overall DBE goal are required to provide an explanation showing why, failure to meet the goal was beyond the sponsor's control. Co tract Goals A contract goal must be established for each prime contract funded by the AIP that has subcontracting possibilities. The requirement applies to both construction and nonconstruction (i.e., architec- tural, engineering, other professional services, equipment, etc.). A single goal for DBEs is also used for the contract goal. The appropriate goal should be included in the contract solicitation (a sample clause is shown on page 30). Contract goals should be set to achieve the overall goal, as illus- trated in Appendix 4, Individual contract goals may vary from the overall goal, The contract goal is determined by dividing the total dollar value of potential subcontract awards to DBEs by the total estimated dollar value of the prime contract. Unlike the overall goal, which is based on the Federal share only, contract goals are based on the total contract amount - the Federal share plus the sponsor's matching funds. Specific Contract Potential DBE Contracts (Dollars) DBE Percentage Goal= Total Estimated Cost of Prime Contract (Dollars) Sponsors are not required to submit contract goals with their DBE program, but a description of the methodology (Appendix 4) to be used in establishing them should be included. The FAA Regional Office may require approval of contract goals prior to solici- tation. Page 16 ; y, Ij Q a Nontla No, 1% AQonda Ilom_ ` 11110 In the example in Appendix 41 the sponsor was able to eAtablih contract goals of 5.7% and 16.6% for the two construction projects. DBE potential in professional services was identified, but a con- tract goal was not established, as more than one contract may be let. No DBE participation was projected for purchase of the fire truck, as none of the manufactures known to the sponsor are DBEs, Be- r cause no subcontracting opportunities exist, a contract goal will not be established. VIl A Means to Ensure that Competitors Make DooQ Faith Efforts to Most the DEE Goal Whenever the City of Denton issues a solicitation for an FAA- assisted contract that has subcontracting possibilities, the solicitation will contain the DBE contract goal. The City will follow this procedure for nonconstruction as well as construction projects. Thus, the appropriate goal will be included in Invi- tations for Bids (IFB) for construction work and in Requests for Proposals (RFP) for architectural, engineering, and other pro- fessional services. The solicitation will include a statement that the apparent suc- cessful competitor will be required to submit DBE participation information and that as a condition of receiving the contract, the competitor must meet the DBE goal or demonstrate to the City that it made good faith efforts. The actual clause to be used is: "The bidder/proposer shall make good faith efforts, as de- fined in Appendix A of 49 CFR Part 23, Regulations of the Office of the Secretary of Transportation, to subcontract percent of the dollar value of the prime contract to small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals (DBE). In the event that the bidder for this solicitation qualifies as a DBE, the contract goal shall be deemed to have been met. individuals who are rebuttably presumed to be socially and economically disadvantaged include women, Black Americans, Ftispanic Americans, Native Americans, Asian-Pacific Americans, and Asian-Indian Americans. The apparent successful competitor will be required to submit infor- mation concerning the DBEs that will participate in the contract. The information will include: (1) the name and address of each DBE; (2) a description of the work to be performed by each named firm; and (3) the dollar value of the work of the contract. If the bidder fails to achieve the contract goal stated herein, it will be required to provide documentation demonstrating that it made good faith e Page 17 u Agonda No. ~ Aclon0a ftem__pp~~ .M WIV efforts in attempting to do so. A bid that fails to me these requirements will be considered nonresponsive.', The DBE participation information will be required prior to com- mitting the City to award the contract to the apparent successful competitor. (If a contract goal has not been established, the clause shown should not be included in the solicitation.) (If a contract goal has been established, a bidder may not meet the c requirements of the bid specification by stating that it will accomplish all work of the contract using its own employees. It, first, must demonstrate to the sponsor's satisfaction, that it made good faith efforts to meet the goal, and despite those efforts, was, unable to subcontract any of the work to DBEs.) If the contract goal. specified in the solicitation is not met, the apparent successful competitor will be required to submit documen- tation of the efforts it made. The City will then determine whether these are "good faith efforts." The following criteria will be used: 1. Whether the contractor attended any pre-solicitation or pre-bid meetings that were scheduled by the recipient to inform DBEs of contracting and subcontracting opportunities; 2. Whether the contractor advertised in general circulation, trade association, and minority-focus media concerning the subcon- tracting opportunities; 3. Whether the contractor provided written notice to a reasonable number of specific DBEs that their interest in the contract was being solicited, in sufficient time to allow the DBEs to participate effectively; 4. Whether the contractor followed up initial solicitations of interest by contracting DBEs to determine with certainly whether the DBEs were interested; 5. Whether the contractor selected portions of the work to be performed by DBEs in order to increase the likelihood of meeting the DBE goals (including, where appropriate, breaking down contracts into economically feasible units to facilitate DBE participation); 6. Whether the contractor provided interested DBEs with adequate information about the plans, specifications, and requirements of the contract; Page 18 C a` c 4 Y. y d; U Agenda No. _Q0r2 Agenda Item-, 1~ ez 2 7. Whether the contractor negotiated in good faith with inteYc~sted~ DBEs, not rejecting DBEs as unqualified without sound reasons based on v, thorough investigation of their capabilities; 8. Whether the contractor made efforts to assist interested DBEs in obtaining bonding, lines of credit, or insurance required by the City or contractor; and 0 9. Whether the contractor effectively used the services of available minority community organizations; minority con- tractors groups; local, state, and Federal minority business assistance offices, and other organizations that provide assistance in the recruitment and placement of DBEs. The following points apply to good faith effort determinations: 1. Good faith efforts are those that could reasonably be expected to result in goal attainment by a bidder who aggressively and actively seeks to obtain DBE participation. 2. The above list of nine efforts are recommended by the Dev partment as ones that bidders/proposers may make to obtain DBE participation. It does not represent a mandatory checklist of required actions) no one or combination is required in all cases. 3. The list above is not intended to be exhaustive; other factors or efforts may be relevant in appropriate instances. 4. The city will examine the quantity and intensity of the efforts as well as the type of actions taken. Efforts that are merely z)ro forma are not sufficient, even though they may be sincerely motivated. Alternative Requirements A recipient may prescribe other requirements of equal or greater effectiveness in lieu of good faith efforts. In that case, the recipient should notify the FAA by letter of the content of those requirements prior to contract award. In the event that FAA does not approve of the alternative require- ments, the recipient may be required to use good faith efforts as described above, conclusive Presumption When 49 CFR Part 23 was published b,,+ the Department in 1980 (45 Fed. Reg. 21172, Mar& 3J., 1980), Section 23.45(h) and (i) estab- lished a conclusive presumption to be used in the award of DOT- Page 19 konda Na Auonda Iloni 0310 aesisted contracts. f Under these provisions, the recipient presume conclusively that if one bidder met the MBE contract goals and of- fered a reasonable price, bidders that did not meet the goals had not exerted sufficient reasonable efforts, and hence were ineli- gible to receive the contract. For example, if the low bidder failed to meet the goals, the recip- ient was required to award the contract to another bidder that had, provided that its price was reasonable. k An amendment to Part 23 published on April 27, 1981 (46 Fed. Reg. 23457) replaced the conclusive presumption with the current provi- sions that are illustrated above, which allow the low bidder to receive the contract if it meets the goal or satisfies the recip- ient that it made good faith efforts. r: When the amendment was published, the Department stated that recip- ients may use the mechanism of the original Sections 23.45(h) and (i) or another system of their choice, provided that it is as or more effective than the good faith efforts. Thus, sponsors who wish to use the conclusive presumption approach may do so without obtaining approval from the FAA, Page 20 t K t NondaNo.~ ~w-Appendix I Agonda Item- 11T SCHEDULE AfJ:1to ~ INFORMATION FOR OETERMININC DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ELATE RISE AIGI~512LITY , at any time, the Department or a recipient has reason to believe that If any person or firm has xillfull;•and kuovinSly provided incorrect information or made false statements, or acted in a manner prohibited by 49 CFR Part 29, the responsible official shall refer the matter to the General Counsel of the Department. He/she may initiate procedures for suspension or debarment as provided in 49 CPR 29,17 and/or refer the ratter to the Department of Justice under 18 U.S.C. [001, so deemed appropriate. 1. Naas of firm 2. Address of firm 3. Phone number of firm ( ) 4. Contact Person 5. Nature of Business: Specify major services/products. 6. Geographical Area Served: States counties 7. Years firm has been in business , 8. Type of ownership: (Check one) Corporation Partnership Sole Proprietorship Joint Venture Other (Specify) Appendix 1 t' r~ y f [I Ac~pntla3lum.__~A_ Schedule A l<ta ..1.~~ Page 2 of 6 9. Ownership of firm: Identify thoae uh knaM sc ent or more of the firm's ownersbip. Columns (e) and (f) uuod to be filled oat only if one or more owners is not a socially and economically disadvantaged individual. A S C D S . F Now Years of Ownership voting r face Sex Ownership Percentage Percent If one or more owners is not disadvantaged, list the contributions of money, equipment, real estate, or expertise of each of the owners. (Attach a separate sheet if necessary.) 10. Control of firm: Identify by name, race, sex, and title in the firm those individuals (including owners and non-owners) who are responsible for day-to-day management and policy decision making including, but not limited to, those with prime responsibility for: a. Financial Decisions b. Management Decisions, such as: (1) 6stimatins C Appendix 1 2 { ri ~i t I Pponda No. hgondaltan__ Schedule A /„e% lIJJ~ Page 3 of 6 [rto ! P.Z. i (2) Marketing and Sales d~ r 2 f (3) Hiring and Firing of Kanaigement Personnel (4) Purchase of Major Items or Supplies c. Sslpervision of Field Operations 11. For each of those listed in number 10, provide a brief summary of the person's experience and number of years with the firm, indicating the person's qualifications for the responsibilities given his or her. (Attach a separate sheet if necessary.) 12. Describe or attach a copy of any stock options or other ownership options that are outstanding, sad any agreements between owners or between owners and third parties whi,.h restrict ownership or control of the disadvantaged owners. (Attach a separate shoot if necessary.) Appendix 1 3 C ~r r 'W Aponda No. /n? - 0 ApondaJlorri 5j4-- Late Schedule A ~ i/mange 4 of E 13. Zdentify any owner (see Item 9) or management f~ifY {s7e'e zter 10) of the eased firm who is or has been an employee of mothom firm that has an 1 ownership interest in or a present business relationship with the named firm, Present business relationships include shared space, equipment, financing, or employees as well as both firms having some of th'e same owners. r 14. What are the gross receipts of the firm for sach of the last three years? Year ending Gross Receipts $ Year ending Gross Receipts $ Par ending Gross Receipts $ 15. hags of bonding company, if any, bonding Limit: Source of letters of credit, if toy: 16. Are you authorized to do business in the state as well as locally, including all necessary business licenses? Its No a Attach one copy of the operating license, if any. Type of Business License Number Appendix 1 4 c Y ;i L~ 'r konda No. Apondalloin Schedule A R31o - / g~' /Page 5 of 6 17, Specify the major items of equipment owned an r leaV y the firm. Name and Address Equipment Owned Quantity Equipment Leased of Ovnar ' i 4 18, Has the firm ever applied for or been denied DDE MDE/W3Z certification with the City, Department of Transportation, or elsenherel Yes No Application Pending If yes, name the certifying authority, data, sad state circumstances of such certification or daaial, Appendix L S t `I J{ Aflonda ND. Agenda Itern0,4_____ Schedule A "Page 6 of 6 We AFFIDAVIT -vff Z "The undersigned swears that the foregoing statements are true v/ranyd' correct and include all material information necessary to identify and explain the operations of (name of firm) as well as the ownership thereof. Further, the undersigned agrees to provide, through the prises contractor or, if no prima directly to the grantee, current, complete, ° and accurate information regarding actual work performed on the project, the payment therefore, and any proposed changes, if any, of the foregoing arrangements and to permit the audit and examination of books, records, and files of the named firm. Iny material misrepresentation will be grounds for re terminating any contract which may be awarded and for initiating action under Federal and State laws concerning false statements." Note: If, after filing this Schedule A and before the work of this firm is completed on the contract covered by this regulation, there is any significant change in the information submitted, you must inform the grantee of the change through the prime contractor or, if no prime contractor, inform the grantee directly. Signature Name (Print or Type) Title Date Corporate Seal (where appropriate), Date State of , County of On this day of , 19-, before mr. appeared (name) , to me personally known, who, being duly sworn, d d execute :he fors going affidavit, and did state that he or she was properly authorised by (name of fins) to execute the affidavit and did to as his or her free act and deed. (Seal) Notary Public Commission expires Appendix 1 6 v. i. iy Agenda No. Ardonda item,. Appendix 2 Rate SCHEDULE B Q INFORMATION FOR DETERMINING JOINT VENTMEE ELIGIBILITY (This form need not be filled in if all joint venture firms are disadvan- taged business enterprises.) 1. Name of joint venture 2. Address of joint venture 4 3. Phone number of joint venture 4. Identify the firms which comprise the joint venture. (The DBE partner must couple" Schedule A) a. Describe the role of the DOE firm in the joint venture b. Describe very bviefly the experience and business qualifications of each non-DBE joint venture: S. Nature of joint venture's business 6. Provide a copy of the joint venture agreement. 7. What is the claimed percentage of DOE ownership? 8. Ownership of joint venture; (This need not be filled in if described in the joint venture agreement, provided by question 6.) a. Profit and loss sharing. b. Capitol contributions, including equipment. c. Other applicable ownership interests. 9. Control of and participation in this contract. Identify by name, race, sex, and "firm" those individuals (and their titles), who are responsible for day-to-day msnagament and policy decision asking, including but not limited to, those with primary responsibility for: Appendix 2 1 k 3 i i Y g i' Agenda No. _ ! s~G[~--- Agenda Ilom__:._-._.__ Rate Schedule B t`' dr} 33 p~'`~ Page 2 of 3 a. Financial Meisions b, Management Decisions) such as; (l) 6atimeting (2) Marketing and Sales " (3) Hiring and Firing of Management Personnel (4) Purchasing of major item or supplies c. Supervision of field operations Note,' If, after filing this Schedule B and before the completion of the joint venture's work on the contract covered by this regulation, there is any significant change in the information submitted, the joint venture must inform the granteeo either directly or through the prime contractor if the joint venture is a subcontractor. Affidavit "rho undersigned swear that the foregoing statements are correct and include all material information necessary to identify and explain the terms and operation of our joint venture and the intended participation by each joint venturer in the undertaking, Further, the undersigned covenant and agree to provide to the grantee current, complete, sad accurate information regarding actual joint venture work and the payment therefore, and any proposed changes in any of the joint venture arrangements and to permit the audit and examination of the books, records, and files of the joint venture, or those to each joint venture relevant to the joint venture, by authorized representatives of the grantee or the Federal funding agency. Any material misrepresentation will be grounds for terminating any contract which may be awarded for initiating action under Federal or State laws concerning false statowants," Appendix 2 2 ~ S, 4 FsrY PHtd K1 4 fq AConda No, Agni)da ROM_~_ 1Cl__. _ Schedule B Wto Page 3 of 3 3 Name of yirm Name of Firm k Signature Signature Name Name Title Title i Date Data 0 Date State of County of r On this day of , 19r, before as appeared name , to se peraoaally known, who, be ng duly sworn, did execute the foregoing affidavit, and did state that he or she vas properly authorised by (name of firm) to execute the affidavit and did so as his or bar free act and dead, Notary Public Commission Expires (Seal) Date State of County of On this day of , 19 , before so appeared , same , to me peraoaally known, who, being duly sworn, 4 -id execute the foregoing affidavit, and did state that he or she was properly autborised by (ease of fires) to execute the affidavit and did so as his or her frog. act and dead, Notary Public Commission txp res (Seal) 3 Appendix 2 i ,a 4 f 1Snda No. Zet- AgOnda Ilum_. .1 2CG_ 0310 J_. 'tr" Appendix 3 SAMPLE FORMAT - UPDATED GOAL INF( ~ATIi V ZT1'0>' Airport Sponsor: Name of Preparers Tel. No.: Goal Period: From: Thru: Part I: Overall DBE Goal for FAA-assisted Proiects Mark one box below: q An overall DBE goal IS NOT required because the airport sponsor does not plan to award any contracts during the goal period based on an FAA grant that exceeds the amount which requires the setting of a DBE goal. (See page 2 and 3 of the Kit for amounts.) An overall DBE goal IS required. The DBE goal methodology is attached (See sample in Appendix 4.) Part II. Leasina Goals and Methodology (See sample in Appendix 5.) Estimated Date Date Description Gross Lease Lease % Joint Lessee of Lease Receipts bagin• Expires MBE iIBE Venture Totals This Year's Leasing Goals: MBE:_Z HBE: X Narrative Description of Leasing Goal Methodology: Explanation for Not Increasing Goal Above Previous Year's Level (if applicable : Last Year's Leasing Goals: MBE; NBEr Explanation for Not Achieving Last Year's Leasing Goals (if appliable): Appendix 3 C i4 k S' Ri V Appendix 4 SAMPLE FORMAT - OVERALL DBE COAL METHODOLOGY Airport Svoaeor; City of Nev Ho a, Aganda No. D Oregon Name of Preoarer: Richard Smith Tel, No. Agnndaltarn Coal Period: Prom: 1 1 ' l DBE Goal; 89 Thru: 12/31/89 aalU Overal 13.9X* ~0 *If the goal is less than 10x0 attrch required justification, Methodology for Establishing Overall Coal: . Pro Act items $ Amount * 9 DOE Prof. Serv,: 500000 Constructioa: 600000 45,000 Equipment: 250,000 80,500 Land; (100,000) r,► -0- Noncontract; (404000) ww -0- - -0- Total 9000000 125,500 (13.9X) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: Item Description $ Amount $ DOE Plana 5 Design 4 000 Inspection b Supervision 4 500 4,000 Consultant 40,000 -a Real Estate Appraisal X500 40,000 Real Estate Survey 500 50- Audit 500 500 500 Total 508000 450000 (90.02) i * The federal share of all estimated contract costs shown is 90%, Land, in-house work, and other noncontractual costs are not included in the goal-setting or reporting process. Note: Sponsors add their contractors may meet DOE goals by using the breakout in the methodology or by using any other breakout. Appendix 4 e 1 < 'f. A?yendix 4 Construction: Contract It improve access road, Its Description $ Amount $ DBE Aganda No, ' Remove Curb 1,500 1,500 jj Rsswve Bituminous Paving 5,000 5,000 Agondallem_ Excava t ion 21000 2, 000 w1a .17 2L-142- M. Caen savers 2,000 -0- 027q Catch Basins 4,000 -0- Manholes 2,000 -0- Concrete Walk 4,000 -0- Combined Curb 6 Gutter 8,000 -0- Paving 144,500 -0- Elsctrjc 13000 11000 Marking 500 500 Total 174,500 100000 (Contract Goal: 5.7%) Contract 2: Construct Hold Apron - RW 18L Item Description $ Amount $ DBE Clearing 5,000 50000 Excavation 400000 100000 Paving 325,000 -0- Trucking 35,000 35,000 Landscaping 15,000 15,000 Lighting 5,000 50000 Marking S00 500 Total 425,500 70,500 (Contract Goal: 16.6%) E UQ IPMENT: Item Description $ Amount $ DBE Firs Truck 250,000 -0- LOD t Item Description $ Amount $ DBE Easement 1000000 NONCONTRACTUAL: Item Description $ Amount $ DBE Tres Removal (Force Account) 300000 Administration 92900 Advertising 100 ~0 Total 4010 Appendix 4 2 \ C~ v. :r Appendix 4 Previous Year's Goals: DBE: 12,5% Previous Year's Accomvlishmenta: DBE: 13.1% AaondaNo. - _ r@ande ftotti Th,~w C,L lbfe 18 ~2 Explanation for Not Achieving Previous Year's Goals (if applicabls Not Applicable. i Explanation for Not Increaaia Goal Above Previous Year's Accomplishments (if applicable : Not Applicable. Narrative Deacri tion of overall DBE Goal Methodoto . Include Iofomatiom oa 1 Recruitment Area s and (2 Any Additional AIP Pro3ect_s Expected Duriag the Goal Period. For the two construction projects, our recruiting area consists of the county encompassing the airport and the 4 adjacent counties. Our estimates are based on the availability of qualified DBE's, as listed in our Directory and the State DOT Directory, and the fact that the work is similar to work performed last year. W#9 know of a ODE based outside the metropolitan area who is capable of performing other work under Construction Contract tl, but that firm has been uawilling in the past to travel to our job sites for contracts of this ciise. The estimates for professional services reflect our search state-wide. We utilised a DBE 2 years ago who we expect to compete and be the best , qualified for portion's of the work. Once the scope of the work has been determined, a goal will be established for each prime contract having subcontracting possibilities. The goals will reflect the DBE potential shown in the breakdown of the work items. Regarding pur^hase of the f£retruck, ve are unaware of any manufacturers that are DIL'a. Because there are no subcontracting opportunities, a contract goal will not be established. One additional AIP project is planned for the goal period, Our engineers have not yet completed estimates for the expansion of the North Terminal. When these are completed, we will submit s. revised overall DBE goal. 3 / Appendix 4 ` r .T 'f t it z! CITY OF DENTON PURCHASING OFFICE 901-B TEXAS ST. DENTON, TEXAS 76201 Agenda No. 817.383-7100 ADarlda flgm__ METRO 817-267.0042 Dato ~+¢Z Z FAX 817-382.4692 BIDDER'S LIST APPLICATION New Application Add Commodities Federal I.D. Nor Social Security N. Date: Name ardor Address Change Delete Commodities 1, Applicant's Name and Mailing Address for Bidding Forms end 2. Mailing Address for Payments (ildifferent from item 1): s Purchase Orders: ,,vr 3. Type of Organization (Check IDne): M nor y-Owned woman-Owned 4. How Long in Present Ind Adual Partnership Non-Profit Organization Business: Corporation, Incorporated Under Laws of the State ol, 6. Persons Authorized to Sign Nd<, Offers and Contracts (Indicato NAgent): Name Official Capacity Telephone N (Include Area Code) _ 6. Persons to Contact on Bids or Quotes: Name Officiul Capacity Telephone N (Include Area Code) 7. Type of Business: Manufacturer = FacUory Representative Whobsale Dealers Retail Dealer Construetbn: 0 Unlimited Contracts Cl United Contractor - Service Establishment - Define: Other - Defoe: W- I hereby oatify that Information supplied herein Is correct. Print or Type Name arod Title Signature FOR PURCHASING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY I to Recd. ten Mailed ten Recd. Date Enl. Vendor N Nan1e Key t~- \ n Ag0nda No. _ COMMODITY LIST Agenda Item 07D And Please place a checkmark by the class(es) you are inte WtF~ed nisi ng: D 005 Abiasivos 265 EirictrlcaI Equipment and Supplies (Excetit Cable and Wire 010 Acoustical Tilo, Insulating Materials, and Supplies -267 £iectronlo Components, Repiwement Parts, and Accessories: _015 Addressing, Copying, Mimeograph, and Spirit Duplicating end Miscellaneous Electronic Equipment (Not for Testing or Machine Supplies: Chemicals, Inks, Paper, etc. Analyzing-See Class 730) _ 020 Agricultural Equipment, Implements, and Accessories __290 Energy Collecting Equipment and Accessrnles: Sularand Wind _ 022 Agricultural Implement and Accessory Parts 295 Elevators, Building Type v025 Air Compressors and Accessories 300 Embossing and Engraving -031 Air Conditioning, Heating, and Vontilatlng Equipment, Parts 305 Engineering Equipment, Surveying Equipment, Drawing and Accessories (Soo Related Items in Class 740) instruments, and Supplies 036 Aircraft end Airport, Equipment, Parts, and Supplies 310 Envelopes, Plain or Printed 045 Appliances and Equipment, Household Type 315 Epoxy Based Formulations for Adhesives, Coatings, and 050 Art Equipment and Supplies Related Agents _055 Automotive Accessories: Automobiles, Buses, Trucks, etc. 320 Fastening, Packaging, Strapping, Tying Equipment and 060 Automotive Maintenance Items and HepaluReplacement Parts Supplies _ 065 Automotive Bodies, Accessories, and Pats 330 Fencing o _ 070 Automotive Vehicles and Related Transportation Equipment - 340 335 Fire Fertilizers sod n Sal Equipment pmenttan and d _076 Automotive Shop Equipment and Supplies _ Supplies 080 Badges, EmNems, Name Tags and Plates, Joweiry, etc. --345 ainrdsl4 aAid l&g and )Sefery Equipment and Suppl es (Except Nuclear 085 Bags, Bagging, Ties, and Erosion Control Equipment 360 Flags, Flag Poies, Banners, and Aocessories -100 Barrels, Drums, Kegs, and Containers -_360 Floor Covering, Floor Covering Installation and Removal 105 Bearings (Except Wheel Bearings and Seals-See Class 060) - Equipment, and Supplies -110 Bells and Selling: Conveyor, Elevator, Power Transmission, 365 Floor Maintenance Machines, Parts, and Accessories and V•Belts 390 Foods: Perishable _ 115 BlochomfcaA, Research -395 Forms, Continuous: Computoi Paper, Form Labels, Snap Out 120 Boats, Motors, and Marine and Wildlife Supplies Forms, and Folders for Forms -_125 Bookbinding Supplies 400 Foundry Castings, Equipment, and Supplies -135 Bricks and Other Clay Products, Refractory Materials, and 405 Fuel, Oil, Grease and Lubricants Slone Products u410 Furniture: Health Care and Hospital Fa Ility 140 Broom, Brush, and Map Manufacturing Machinery and Supplies -415 Furniture: Laboratory -145 Brushes (Not Otherwise Classified) -_420 Furniture: Cafeteria, Chapel, Dormitory, 150 Builder's Supplies Lounge, Scholl Household, Library, _ _ 165 Buildings and Structures: Fabricated and Prelab&ated 426 Furniture: Office _ 165 Cafeteria and Kitchen Equipment, Commercial 430 Gases, Containers, Equipment: Laboratory, Medcsl, and _ 175 Chemical Laboratory Equipment and Supplies Welding ,180 Chemical Raw Materials (in Large Ouantftles Primanlyfor ._A•"+ Germicides, Cleaners, and Related Sanitation Products for Manufacturing Janitorial and Laundry Products) Health Care Personnel -190 Chemical and Solvents, Commercial (In Bulk) 440 Glass and Glazing supplies 192 Cleaning Compositions, Detergents, Solvents, Arid Strippers- -445 Hand Toils (Powered and Non-Powered), Accessories and Prepackaged Supplies 193 Clinical Laboratory Reagents and Testa (Blood Grouping, _ 450 Hardware and Related Items Diagnostic, Drug Monitoring, etc.) 460 Hose, Accessories, and Supplies: Industrial, Commercial. and 195 Clocks, Timers, Wa dRs, and Jeweters' end Watchmakers' Garden Toes and Equipment 465 Hospital and Surglral Equipment, InsWmsnls, and Supplies _ 200 Clothing, Apparel, Uniforms, and Accessories 470 Hospital Eqquulpmenl and Supplies: Mobility, Speech Impaired, -205 Computers and Information Processing Systems: Hardware, and Restrcilnl Items Software, Peripherals, Accessories, Supplies, Related 476 Hospital, Surgical, and Related Medical Accessories and Materials Sundry Items ___210 Concrete and Metal Culverts, Pilings, Pipe, Septic Tanks, 486 Janitorial Supplies, General Une Accessories and Supplies 490 Laboratory Equipment and Accessories (For Wneral Analytical -220 Controlling, Indicating, Melsuring, Monitoring, and Recording and Research Use): Nuclear, Optical, and Physical Instruments and Supplies _ 493 Laboratory Equipment andAccessodos: Biochemistry, _ 226 Coders, Drinking Water _ Chemistry, Environmental Science, etc. _ 232 Crofts, General 495 Laboratory and Field Equipment and Supplies: Biology, 233 Crabs, Specialized Botany, Geology, Microbiology, Zoology, etc. _ 240 Cutlery, Dishes, Flatware, Glassware, Trays, Uten<ils, and _ 600 Laundry and Dry Cleaning Equipment, Accessories, Paris and supplies Supplies-Commercla1 250 Data Processing Cards and Paper 505 Laundry and Dry Cleaning Compounds and Supplies -_255 Decals and Stamps ` 610 Laundry Textiles and Supplies 266 Draperies, Curtains, and Upholstery Material (Including 616 Lawn Maintenance Equipment, Accessories, and Parts (Non- Automolb0i Agricultural Application _270 Drugs, Pharmaceuticals and 84ologlcais (For Human 620 Leetharand Related Equipment, Prodkats, Accessories and Therapeutic Use) Supplies -271 Dnrga, Pharmaceuticals, and Sets (For Large-Volume 525 Library and Archival Equipment, Machines, and Supplies Parenteral Adminlstratlon, Infusion, irrigation, and Tube 530 Luggage, Brief Cases, Pumas and Related Items Feoding) 540 Lumber and Related Products 260 Electrical Cahles and Wires (Not Electronic) _`545 Machinery and Hardware, Industrial t r. _650 Marken, Plaques, Signs, and Traffic Control Devicos 830 Tanks (Metal, Wood, and Synthetic Materials): Mobile, 655 Marking and Stenciling Devices Portable, and Stationary _556 Maas Transportation-Transit Bus _,832 Tape (Not Data rocessing, Measuring, Optical, Sewing, Sound, or 657 Mass Transportation-Transit Bus Accessories and Parts - 840 Telev[slon Equipment and Accessories ds and ratus and Instrument; (Not for Electrical or 659 Mass Maas Transportation- flBail all Vehl Vehicles Partnds ad Accjnd Aocessories -846 Testing Ap&a 659 _ Electronic asurements) _ 560 Material Handing and Storage Equipment and Allied items 860 Textiles. Fibers, Household Linens, and Piece Goods _665 Mattress Manufacturing Machinery and Supplies ^855 Theatrical Equipment and Supplies 11 670 Metals: Bars, Plates, Rods, Sheets, Ships, Structural Shapes, 660 Tickets, Coupon Books, Sakes Books, Script Books, eta 0 Tubing, and Fabricated items - 575 Microfiche and Warolilm Equipment, Aocossories, and Supplies 663 Tires and Tubas 578 Misoefieneous Products 664 Train Controls, Electronic _580 Musical Instruments, Accessories, and Supplies -965 Twine _ 695 Nursery Stock, Equipment, and Suppltea 870 Venetian Blinds, Awnings, and Shades 1 _600 Office Machines, Equipment, and Accessories 875 Veterinary Equipment and Supplies t _605 Office Mechanical Alds, Small Machines, and Apparatuses 880 Visual Education Equipment and Supplies (Except Projections Lamps-Sea Class 285) 610 Office Supplies: Carbon Paper and Ribbons, All Typos v 885 Water Treating Chemicals _615 r)ffice Supplies, General 890 Water Supply and Sewage Treatment Equipment (Not for AirO °s 620 Office Supplies: Erasers, Inks, Leads, Pens, Pencils, etc. Conditioning, Steam Boiler, or Laboratory Reagent Water) I 625 Optical Equipment, Accessories, and SuppFas 895 Welding Equipment and Supples 630 Paint, Protective Coatings, Varnish, Wallpaper, and Related 898 XMadRay and Otlter Radiologkzl Equipment and Supplies ° 635 Painting Equipment and Accessories 905 Aircrafft:Operators Services u640 Paper and Plastic Products, Disposable 906 Archltect•EngineerandOther Prolessional Design Services (For 645 Paper (For Office and Print Shop Use) Construction Coverage See Public Works, Class 963) 650 Park, Playground, and Swimming Pod Equipment 908 Bookbinding, Rebinding, and Repairing 655 PholoprapMc Equipment and Supplies (Not Includng Graphic 910 Building Maintenance and Repair Services Arts, kAicrot4m, and X•Ray) 9115 Communications and Made Related Services ,_665 Plastics, Resins, Fiberglass: Forming, Laminating, and Molding 920 Data Processing Services and Software Equipment, Accessories, and Supplies -924 Educational Services 670 Plumbing Equipment, Fixtures, and Supplies _929 Equtpment Maintenance, Reconditioning, and Repair Services- ~675 Poisons:Arrio0uraf and Industrial Agricultural, Automotive, Heavy Industrial Equipment, and 680 Police Equipment and Supplies Marine Equipment _ 700 Printing Plant Equipment and Supplies (Except Paper) 931 Equipment Maintenance, Reconditioning, and Repair Services- 705 Pdntkg Preparationa: Etching, Photoengraving, Typesetting, Appliance, Athletic, Cafeteria, Furniture, Musical instruments, and Preparing Mats, Negatives, and Plates and Sewing Equipment _,710 ProathetloDevices, Hearing Aldo, Auditory Testing Equipment, 934 Equipment Maintenance Reconditioning, and RepalrServices- Electronio Reading Devises, ela Laundry, Lavin, Painting, Plumbing, and Spraying Equipment 715 Publications nclAudovisual Malsdats (Prepared Materials 936 Equipment Maintenance, Reconditioning, and RepairServices- Onfy, Not Equipment, Supplies, or Production) General Equipment _ 720 Pumping Equipment and Acosasorles 938 Equipment Maintenance, Reconditioning, aryJ Repair Services- _725 Rack Communication, Telephone, and Telecommunication Hospital, Laboratory, and Testing Equlpment Equipment, Accessories, and Supplies _ 939 Equipment Mantenence, Recondition", and Repair Servic:es- 730 Redo Communleationand Telecommunication Testing, Office, Photographic, and Radio(Television Equipment Measuring, and Analyzing Equipment, Accessories and 948 Financial Services Supplies 948 Health Related SoNoes (Not Including Human Services) 735 Rags, Shop Towels, and Wiping Cioihs 052 Human Services ~-•4 Refrigeration Equipment andAaessories 966 Library Services (Excluding Class 908-Bookbinding. Rebinding, _746 Road rid Highway Building Materials (Asphaltic) and Repairing) 760 Road and Highway Building Materials (Not Asphaltic) 961 Miscellaneous Professional Services _765 Road and Highwney Equl entand Parts: Asphalt end 962 Miscellaneous Services Concrete Handing and I ocessIng -_964 Personnel, Temporary (Employment Agency Services) 760 Road and Highway Equipmenl: Earth Handing, Grading, _966 Printing, Publohng, Silk Screening Production, and Typesetting Moving, Pecking, etc. 968 Public Works, Construction, and Related Services _766 Road and Highway Equipment (Except Asphalt, Concrete, and 971 Real Property Rental or Lease Earth Handling Equipment fn Classes 765 and 760) u976 Rental or Lease Services of Equipment-Agricultural, Alraah, 770 Roofing (Except Wood-See Class 540) Automotive Heavy Equipment, and Maine Equipment 776 Sah (Sodium Chloride) (Except Tabla-Sea Class 393) 977 Rental or Lease Service of Equipment-Appliances, Cafeiai* -780 Scales and Weighing Apparatus (See 17508 for Laboratory Film, Furniture, Hardware, Musical, Sewing, and Window and Balance;) Floor Coverings _785 Schod Equipment and Supplies 979 Rental or Lease Services of Equipment-Engineering. Hospital, 700 Seed, Sod, Sole, and Inoculant; Laboratory, Precision Instruments, Refrigeration, Scales, and -800 Shoes and Boots Testing Equipment SW Sound Systems, Components, and Accessories: Group 981 Rental or Lease of Equipment-General Equipment Intercom, Music, Publio Address, etc, -9g3 Rental or Lease Services of Equipment-Janitorlah, Laundry, 805 Sporting and Athletic Goods Lawn, Painting, Spraying, and Textio Equipment 810 Spraying Equipment (Except Household, Nursery Plant, and W985 Rom. it or lease Radio SSlces of quIpo Photographic, 988 Roadside, Grounds, and Park Area Services Printing, _ 816 Steateam rid Hnt Water Filings, A rid Podes, and Equuipip Supplies -990 Security, Fire, Safety, and Emergency Services _ 820 Steam Boilers. Steam Heating, and Power Prrtl Equipment 825 Stockman Equipment and Supplies / i C, r a~ la fl City of Denton Texas Agenda No. 901.B Texas Street Ayonda item_ Denton, Texas 76204 i2oto PURCHASINGIWAREHOUSE DIVISION GENERAL INFORMATION BUSINESS HOURS: MONDAY THRU FRIDAY EXCLUDING HOLIDAYS PURCHASING 8,00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M. PURCHASING NUMBER: (817),V3-7100 WAREHOUSE 7:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M. WAREHOUSE NUMBER: (817)5N-8438 RECEIVING 8:00 A.M. 4;00 P.M. MEWAREHOUSE TRO NUMBERMBER, (817) 26.0042 FAX NUMBER: (817) 382.4692 00 Invoice address: City of Denton Accounts Payable 215 E. McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Materials, supplies and services supplied to the City of Denton without an authorized purchase order are the responsibility of the vendor. Purchase orders are required prior to payments being authorized, To remain on the City of Denton Bidder's Mailing List, vendors must actively participate Inthe bidding process either by submission of bids or notice In wrhing that you are unable to bld on a partlcular transaction but wish to remain on the Bidder's Mailing List for that particular item. A supplier's continued failure to respond to Invitatlons for Bids, Request for Proposals or Requests for Quotations will be understood by the Clty o1 Denton to indicate lack of Interest and concurrence In the removal of the supplier's name from the Bidder's Mailing List for the items concerned. Please ratify the City of Denton Purchasing Department Immediately of any changes in name, address, or telephone number, changes In personnel fisted on this application, and addition or deletion of items you are Interested In providing. No officer or employee of the City of Denton shall have a financial Interest, direct or indirect, in any contract with the City of Denton. Minority and small business vendors or oontractors are encouraged to bid on any and all City of Denton, Texas projects, The City of Denton Is an Equal Opportunity Employer, 942,DOC CI +f a CITY COUNCIL A ooooo~ooonoaaoono°OQOO°o o` o0 s~ C °°°°00~oocarIO 4 Y i; Agenda No, Agenda llom__~, _ January 21, 1992 Dale j I CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ° FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager RE: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN EXTENSION OF A SANITARY SEWER LINE. ADJACENT TO THEMUNICIPAL AIRPORT. RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of January 153 1992, recommended to the City Council approval of the construction of approximately 1250 linear feet of sanitary sewer line at the Denton Municipal Airport to serve existing and planned hanger facilities. Construction is to be accomplished by field staff. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: Existing hangers on the north side of Airport Drive are servod by septic system. Some of these systems are showing signs of failure. Plans to expand facilities and add hangers will incorporate land that is necessary for constructing additional septic facilities. Without a gravity sanitary sewer line, further development is essentially at a stalemate. `I'hese businesses do not meet the criteria for Economic Development funding assistance. It might be noted, however, that the city has used very little of the $250,000 per year of the Plan Line funds for the past three years the program has been available. Additionally, the northern half of the airport has a total of seven (7) existing hangers with a total assessod value of $638,364, some of which could be served by such a line plus three new hangers (two of which are currently tinder construction) , which will havo an estimated assessed value of $476054, and will generate $3336.18 in annual city taxes. It might also be noted that these hangers are home to 16 fulltime employees and the new hangers will be providing fobs for 13 new employees in an aircraft engine maintenance business. i _i1' [i➢.i~ Y Agonda No. _9 Apnnda Ilvm_t However, monies are available in the budget for miscellaneous sewer line construction ($100,000), and for sewer line infill ($150,000). The fiscal Impact can be minimized by constructing the line with in house resources. This particular installation is relatively simple in nature, requiring no r specialized equipment, skills or services, above and beyond what Is already available to the Department. AGENCIES AFFECTED; "ate Denton Municipal Utilities, Citizens of Denton, Airport personnel, planning department. FISCAL IMPACT: Estimated Cost If Contracted Out: $31,250 Estimated Cost for Materials Oily: $10,000 Estimated Cost of Labor: 110,00 0 Estimatod Cost if done In House $20,000 / A *MraA(nn submitted, . ll PREPARED/APPROVEDBY: R. H'. Nelson, Txecutive Director Department of Utilities Exhibit: Location Map Minutes PUB Meeting of January 15, 1992 C Ai\AN11T9L. CC ' Disk Xx ti A • JAN 13 '92 14:22 P•1 Aoenda No. 9 °DOL Aoenda Ilom_ ti ' ry.SP r• a • r Proposed Lima d'~ llndnr Cogskwatian Nan~e~e t:+ (✓~•epectd Nanyar• Small 1 n y Nanda No. Agonda Iloln _ Excerpt Minutes of Public Utilities Board Colo January 15, 1992 14. CONSIDER OE L OF PAI, AIRPORT. OF A SANITARY SEWER LINE ADJACENT TO T Nelson reviewed this item advising that the City owns the Airport and lease hanger space to industrial firms. Normally, the property owner, the City of Denton in this case, is responsible for extending sewer lines. However, the Airport does not have funds to pay for installation of sewer lines. All of the hangers and businesses north of the terminal use septic tanks. However, those have not been wonting very wall and now that several now hangers and concrete aprons are being constructed, it is becoming very difficult to find enough area to put in the septic tank drain fields. has looked at the ~lposlsibllity of using funds set aside in the plan 1 ne program; planned to however, the value of the hangers served and the number of people they will be hiring is not sufficient for this to qualify under the Plan Line Program. fore, funds There lines In unsor ed areas itof the City, that is to us d to Install sewer need be Thompson asked if there was any way the Utility Department could recover this cost. He emphasized that the City (General Government) as the developer should be paying for the installation. Coplen stated that the Utility Department is doing several other projects of this same nature, i.e., lines, underground power strongly that he iityshould not support installation of septic sewer systemsl. Thompson agreed that perhaps installation was justified but asked about the second hase, by this installation be growth fin that area. unded by Gene General Government or by the Airport? then there mIf a ot y out cfidevelopment plant line fund.- already sot Laney the Utility commented could pull that A aside. Nelson advised that once this project is installed, there may be other hangers to the north that may also request this service. Board Action After substantial discussion, Laney made a motion to recommend to the City Council that the Utility Department complete tin in-house installation of 1250 linear foot of sanitary sewer line as shown on the location map, at an estimated cost to the Utility of $20,000. Second by Coplen. All ayes, no nays, motion carried. c NMI I I INFORMATION PRESENTED TO COUNCIL. ~ Deloitte & AT MEETING OF 1-21-92. Touche f I Nenda No. ! k Agonda Ilem__ 4 Dale _ 'Is • 1 COPY OF QENTON,TEXAS Report to Management for the Year Ended September 30, 1991 i, I f A ..a n Member BrITIntemalional i, VUTA Ytt] J, e ip TABLE OF CONTENTS I.A Pie , f FINANCIAL PLANNING 2 'A ACCOUNTING AND Ri3PORTING FOR INSURANCE PROGRAMS 2 j IMPACT AND DRAINAGE FEES 3 ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES AND ISSUES: ' ' Physical Inventory Procedures 3 + Review of Permits Issued 3 Purchasing Policies 3 Fixed Assets Inventory 4 INTERNAL AUDIT 4 APPENDIX Debitte & << TQuehe~ a Deloitte & Touche Suile 1400 Telephone: (214) 720-8100 Lincoln Plaza ITT Telex 4995628 500 North Akard Street Dallas, Texas 76201-3302 I to j December 20, 1991 The Honorable Mayor and City Council and City Manager City of Denton 215 E, McKinney 4 Denton, Texas 76201 ) _trA Dear Mayor, Council Members and City Manager: In planning and performing our audit of the general purpose financial statements of the City of Denton, Texas ("City"), for the year ended September 30, 1991, (on which we issued our report dated December 20, 1991), we considered its internal control structure in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the general purpose financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control structure. Our consideration would not necessarily disclose all matters In the Internal control structure that might be material weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of the specific Internal control structure elements does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that would be material in relation to the general purpose financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period ty employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, However, we noted no matters involving the Internal control structure and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined above. A description of the responsibility of management for establishing and maintaining the Internal control structure, and the objectives of and inherent limitations In such s structure, is set forth in the attached Appendix, and should be read in conjunction with this letter. We did note other matters related to the internal control structure and certain administrative and operating matters, These recommendations resulted from our observations made in connection with our audit of the City's general purpose financial statements for the year ended September 30, 1991, This report in intended solely for the use of the City Council and management and should not be used for any other purpose, We will be pleased to discuss these recommendations with you further and to assist you in implementing them. Yours truly, ~ r International -1- x ' i 1 ii i FINANCIAL PLANNING Observation; The current economic situation has created a turbulent environment for elected officials. Many cities are faced with declining revenue bases and have been forced to increase taxes, reduce fund balances and/or Initiate cost reduction measures. This existing environment has accentuated the need for development of financial plans projecting bath operational revenues and expenditures beyond the scope of the current budget process, This planning may enable the City to develop a formal strategy for identifying service levels and funding service delivery in future years, Recommendation: Develop a financial plan, covering at least five years, to be utilized as a goal for budget development and resource allocation, The City should revise this plan as an integral part of its annual planning and goal-setting sessions, ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING FOR INSURANCE PROGRAMS Observation: The Governmental Accounting Standards Board ("GASB") has Issued Statement No. 10, "Accounting and Financial Reporting for Risk Financing and Related Insurance Issues," which addresses accounting and reporting requirements for governmental entitles which are self-insured or retain certain Insurance risks, Since the City is self-insured for certain insurance programs, the requirements of this statement are applicable for financial statements for periods beginning after June 15, 1994; however, early application is encouraged, Statement No. 10 will require the following accounting and reporting considerations: The activities related to self-Insurance must be reported in the general fund or an Internal service fund. The total premiums charged to other funds should be based on an actuarial method or historical cost Information and adjusted over a reasonable period of time so that internal service fund revenues and expenses are approximately equal. Deficits in the Insurance program must be funded over a reasonable period of time and disclosed in the notes to financial statements. Disclosure in the notes to financial statements will include, among others: " Basis of estimating liabilities Carrying amount of liabilities Reconciliation of changes In aggregate liabilities for two years If the City participates in public e: tity risks pools, then depending on the level of risk assumed, the disclosure and accounting requirements may be extensive. Recommendation: The application of GASB Statement No, 10 may require procedural and reporting changes in the City's accounting procedures. An evaluation should be performed as to the Impact of this statement and procedures established to implement such changes prior to the effective date. 2 DeT u he r. 4 f' i~ IMPACT AND DRAINAGE FEES Observation; Under recent legislation, the City is authorized to levy fees to support storm water drainage improvement projects. These fees can be utilized to fund construction of or improvement to infrastructure necessary to transport storm water End can also be utilized to ensure compliance with state and federal clean water regulations. We understand that the City has formed a committee to address the Impact of this legislation. Recommendation: Consider conducting a study to establish equitable fees which can be utilized for drainage projects and/or improvements to provide compliance with mandated laws and regulations. Key study elements should include: " Land use by type Pervious and impervious area(s) Runoff coefficient Rate structure ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES AND ISSUES Physical Inventory Procedures Observation; The City physically counts Its inventory every year-end, which Involves many man- hours and is quite time-consuming. Previously, the inventory software made it difficult to perform physical counts at times other than year-end. However, the software has been modified to permit counts during the year. Recommendation: Perform the physical Inventory counts on a cyclical basis throughout the, year to reduce the time demands at year-end. Ills would also allow personnel to perform other year-end duties. Cyclical counts also Identify significant variances or shrinkage In a timely manner. Review of Permits Issued Observation: The City issues prenumbered permits for such things as building construction. " However, no reconciliation is performed between the permits issued and the cash collected. Such situation could allow permits to he issued for which no monies were received or for which the monies were misapplied. Recommendation: Cash collections for permits should be reconciled to the number of permits Issued on a regular basis. This type of reconciliation could be performed by the newly created internal audit position. Purchasing Policies Observation: A considerable amount of time was spent by City staff developing and writing the City's current purchasing policy and administrative procedures manual. However, the manual has been in draft form for over a year and has not been formally published. Deloitte & Touches 3 - k i 'tl~ F; CAB 6j r r; L Recommendation: The City should formally publish its current purchasing policy and administrative procedures manual In order to avoid any potential complaints or misunderstandings. Fixed Assets Inventory Observation, The City has performed periodic physical inventories of fixed assets purchased with federal funds, However, a complete physical Inventory has not been performed In several years for all City fixed assets. Recommendation: Perform a complete City-wide fixed asset physical inventory to ensure that fixed ` assets continue to be accurately reflected In the financial statements, Periodic physical inventories establish additional control over the City's fixed assets and assist in evaluating the City's Insurance needs, ,f INTERNAL AUDIT Observation: Currently, the City relies on its system of internal accounting control and the annual indepen6rit audit to provide assurance that the financial statements are fairly presented, While this reliance la adequate, an Internal audit function would provide an additional control level and establish a system which would better monitor operations and the accounting system of the City. We understand that the City has provided for an internal audit function which will report to the Executive Director of Finance. The City is commended for recognizing the Importance of an Internal audit position, Recommendation: Due to the type of projects that will initially be undertaken by the internal auditor, and to ensure the most efficient use of this resource, this reporting arrangement should be appropriate at this time. However, the annual Internal audit plan as well as all reports issued by the internal auditor should be submitted to the Audit Committee of the City Council. A NO& & .4- TDuche n i4 F C ii APPENDIX MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR, AND THE OBJECTIVES t' AND LIMITATIONS OF THE INTERNAL CONTROL STRUCTURE The following comments concerning management's responsibility for internal accounting control, the objectives of and the Inherent limit-1ons in a system of internal accounting control are excerpts from Statements on Auditing Standards of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Management's Responsibility Management Is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of Internal accounting control, In " fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of control procedures, Ob ectives ✓ The objectives of a system are to provide management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition and that transactions are executed in accordance with management's authorization and recorded properly to permit the preparation of financial statements In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, Limitations Because of inherent limitations in any system of internal control, errors or Irregularltles nevertheless may occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of the structure to future perlods is subject to the risk that procedures may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the procedures may deteriorate. 5 _ Towhe s- - b INFORMATION PRESENTED TO COUNCIL li Deloifte & AT MEETING OF 1.21-92. ,S: Is * 1 Touche f Agenda No. _ Agenda Mein Dale I t ' CITY OP DBNTON TFx L As i Singte Audit Reports for the k year Landed September 30, 1991 „q I { r -A .9 { rci C s MemUer w~ DRY International ~I I 1 5 j CITY OF DENTON TEXAS TABLE OF CONTENTS C PaRe Independent Auditors' Report on the Schedule I of Federal and State Financial Assistance 2-3 Schedule of Federal and State Financial Assistance Independent Auditors' Compliance Report Based on an 4 ` Audit of General Purpose Financial Statements Sb independent Auditors' Report on Internal Control Structure independent Auditors' Report on Compliance With the General Requirements Applicable to Major Federal ~_g Financial Assistance Programs independent Auditor' Report on Compliance With the Specific Requirements Applicable to Major Federal 9 Financial Assistance Programs i Independent Auditors' Report on Compliance With Requirements Applicable to Nonmajor Federal to Financial Asststance. Program Transactions 11 Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Independent Auditors' Report on Internal Controls 12 14 (Accounting and Administrative) C i. r 4 (.l µ F i Deloitte& Touche Suite 1400 Telephone: (214) 7208100 Lincoln Plaza ITT Telex: 4995628 500 North Akard Street Dallas, lexas 75201-3302 i INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON THE SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL AND STATE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE 4 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Denton, Texas We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Denton, Texas (the "City") for the year ended September 30, 1991, and have issued our report thereon dated December 20, 1991, These general purpose financial statements are the responsibility of the City's management, Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these general purpose financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, Issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement, An audit Includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures In the general purpose financial statements. An audit also Includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion, Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general purpose financial statements of the City taken as a whole. The accompanying supplemental schedule of federal and state financial assistance for the year ended September 30, 1991, is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the general purpose financial statements, The supplemental , schedule Is the responsibility of the City's management. Such supplemental schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the general purpose financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects when considered in relation to the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole, December 20, 1991 rV 1 F"I ' r Inleina~iorlal x J' CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL AND STATE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Catalog of Fund Federal Balance Federal Orentod Domestic Program Fund September 30, Pass-Through Grantor! Grant Assistance or Award Balance Revenues Program Title I.D. Number I.D. Number Amount October 1, 1990 a era late a Ex_penditures 199f U'S. Department of Housin end Urban Dewe n~~mcnl Commumly Development $ 7,371 Block Grant (1) B-84-MC-48-0036 14.218 S614,000 S 7,571 Community Development 19,714 Black Grant (1) B-85-MC-48.0036 14,218 677,918 19,714 r Community Development Block Grant (1) B-86-MC-48.0036 14.218 557,384 (17,077) S 1,279 S 1,279 (17,077) Community Development 11,441 (76,212) Block Grant (1) B-87-MC-48.0036 14.218 571,558 (76,212) 11,441 Community Development Block Grim( (1) 8.88-MC-48.0036 14.218 553,966 72,390 10,186 10,186 72,390 Community Development 181,770 1,186 Block Grant (1) B-89-MC-48.0036 14.218 578,483 1,186 181,770 Community Development 261,237 S 20,097 281,334 Block Grant (1) B-90-W-48-0036 14.219 553,090 community Development Block Grant (1) B-91•MC-48.0036 14,218 647,168 13,764 3,912 17,676 Community Development Block Grant (1) B-88-MC•48.0222 14.218 7:1,000 Community Development 3,287 3,287 Block Grant (1) R-89-MC48-0222 14,218 50,000 Community Development 35,166 31,745 66,911 Block Grant (1) R-90•MC+18-0222 14,218 47,1)00 Passed Through Slate of Texas Department of Commerce: Rental Rehabilitation 4B 778 49,359 98,137 Program R-87004 14.230 597,891 7,572 566,908 105,113 672,021 7,572 U.S, De artment of the Interior attona arrServrce Texas Historical Commission 48.89-40065.007 unknown 1,000 _1000 1'000 2'000 U.S.De artmentofTrans~wrtation e era v at an Administration - Airport 269,712 31,841 301,556 Improvement Program (1) 87134800670386 20.106 300,000 (1) Major program (Continued) -2- a { 1 r. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL AND STATE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE YEAR F.NDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Catalog of Federal Fund Balance Federal Grantor( Domestic Program Fund Pass-Through Grantor/ Grant Assistance or Award Balance Revenues September 30, Program Title I.D, Number I.D. Number Amount Oclober 1. ,990 Federal State Local Ex itures 1991 Passed Through State Department of Highways and Public Transp) rtation: t Driver Behavior Selective Program 580-XXF-6021 unknown 9,942 S 9,492 $ 9,492 Selective TrafRo Enforcement 8 174 8,174 Project 581-XXF-6124 unknown 12,000 Traffic Management Program - 12,246 S 4,082 16,328 Carroll Blvd. 581-TMF-6093 unknown 15,007 Traffic Management Program - 23,810 7,936 31,746 Engle Urivc 581-TMF-6084 unknown 41,303 Traffic Light Synchronization 37,471 13,499 50,970 Project 580-TLF-6174 unknown 34,471 360,905 57,361 418.266 Federal Emcr•enoy Management Ageney Passed Through Stale Of Texas Dcpartmenl of Publio Safety. 67,543 67,543 Emergency Management Program unknown 67,543 Total Federal Financial Assi S 7,57? 996.35E t63A74 1,159.830 S 7,572 Assistance Slate of Ten, C 'min uslice 532,042 8,745 40,787 rug A use estslanco SF-91-C14-4009 NIA 37,078 3,128 7,916 Drug Abuse Resistance SP-92-C14-4387 NIA 49,376 484,788 788 , 14 640 59,579 Child Abuse Investigation SP-91-B03.3137 NIA 47,726 _ ~L_ 81,769 26,513 108,282 State of Texas Energy Division 11,073 11.073 ^Recycling Program 1037 N/A 20,000 Total State Financial 92,942 26,513 119,355 Assistance £ 7,572 LL TOTAL F INANCIAL FEDERAL STANCE 7 572 $9966356 842, 18 9^7 $1,279,185 (Concluded) -3- A t x 4 r' Deloitte & Touche o . - sane lnoo ' Telephone: t2141720-8100 Lincoln Plaza ITT Telex. 4995628 500 North Akard Street Dallas, Texas 75201 3302 • 0 ` INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' COMPLIANCE REPORT BASED ON AN AUDIT OF GENERAL e PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS i The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Denton, Texas; We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Denton, Texas (the "City") as of September 30, 1991, and for the year then ended and have Issued our report thereon dated December 20, 1991, We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, Issued by the Comptroller General of the llnited States, nose standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement. Compliance with laws, regulations, contracts and grants applicable to the City Is the responsibility of the City's management. As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of the City's compliance with } certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. However, our objective was not to provide an opinion on overall compliance with such provisions. The results of our tests Indicate that, with respect to the items tested, the City complied, in all material respects, with the provisions referred to In the preceding paragraph. With respect to items not tested, nothing came to our attention that caused its to believe that the City had not complied, In all material respects, with those provisions. This report Is Intended for the Informatlon of the City Council, management and appropriate federal and state agencies. This restriction Is not Intended to limit the distribution of this report, which is a matter of public record, December 20, 1991 r' U i WO(11,111onal -4. s i 1? Delcitte & buche Suite 1400 - Teli,plrone: (214)_ 720 1310 - 0 Lincoln Plaza i r I Tolcx 4995628 500 North Akard Street Dallas, Texas 75201-3302 • INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON 771E INTERNAL CONTROL STRUCTURE .Y~ The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Denton, Texas: We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the Clo, of Denton, Texas (the "City") as of and for the year ended September 30, 1991, and have Issued our report thereon dated December 20, 1991. We conducted our audit In accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, Issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement. In planning and performing our audit of the general purpose financial statements of the City for the year ended September 30, 1991, we considered Its internal control structure in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the general purpose financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control structure, The management of the City is responsible for establlshing and maintaining an internal control structure. In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of Internal control structure policies and procedures. The objectives of an Internal control structure are to provide management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition and that transactions are executed in accordance with management's authorization and recorded properly to permit the preparation of general purpose financial statements In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of inherent limitatlons In any internal control structure, errors or irregularities may nevertheless occur and not he detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of the structure to future periods Is subject to the risk that procedures may become Inadequate because of changer In conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation of policies and procedures may deteriorate, vii i ~Il~Cff13~10118~ 5 h I~ 7:' I:YY l~?y IRKS yatilFF~.. 4 ,w For the purpose of this report, we have classified the significant internal control structure policies and procedures In the following categories: is Billings - Receivables rA - Cash receipts Purchasing and receiving - Accounts payable q - Cash disbursements Payroll Inventory control ,t - Property and equipment - General ledger - Compliance with laws and regulations related to the federal and state financial assistance a programs r, For all of the Internal control structure categories listed above, we obtained an understanding of the design of relevant policies and procedures and whether they have been placed In operation, and we assessed control risk. Our consideration of the internal control structure would not necessarily disclose all matters in the Internal control structure that might he material weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A material weakness is a reportable condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the specific Internal control structure elements does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities In amounts that would be material In relation to the general purpose financial statements being audlted may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees In the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no matters Involving the Internal control structure and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined above. This report is intended for the information of the City Council, management and appropriate federal unrl state agencies, This restriction Is not Intended to limit the distribution of this report, which is a matter of public record. A December 20, 1991 Delcitte & 6 buch+ L ` r Y, i5 Deloitte & i buche Swte 1400 Telephone: (214) 720.8100 I Lincoln Plaza ITT Telex: 4995628 500 North Akard Slreel Dallas, Texas 75201.3302 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERAL, REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO MAJOR FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council c City of Denton, Texas; We have applied procedures to test City of Denton, Texas (the "City") compliance with the following requirements applicable to each of its major federal financial assistance programs, which are Identified in the schedule of federal and state financial assistance, for the year ended September 30, 1991; Political activity Davis-Bacon Act Civil rights Cash management Federal financial reports - Allowable costs/cost principles - Drug-Free Workplace Act - Administrative requirements Our procedures were limited to the applicable procedures described In the Office of Management and Budget's Compliance Supplement for Single Audits of State and Local Governments, Our procedures were substantially less in scope than an audit, the objective of which Is the expression of an opinion on City compliance with the requirements listed In the preceding paragraph. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. With respect to the items tested, the results of those procedures disclosed no material instances of noncompliance with the requirements listed in the first paragraph of this report, With respect to Items not tested, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe thal the City had not complied, in all material respects, with those requirements. If1(0malIona! 7 - M This report is intended for the information of the City Council, management and appropriate federal i and state agencies. This restriction is not Intended to limit the distribution of this report, which Is a F matter of public record. December 20, 1991 i-A I'u GiSTM, 1 q w~ -•A -I PI Touche 3 I i! r Deloitte & buche . - - Swlu 1400 --Telephone: - (214)120-8100 Lincoln Plaza ITT Telex: 4995626 500 North Akani Street Dallas, Texas 75201 3302 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO MAJOR FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS b The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Denton, Texas; We have audited City of Denton, Texas (the "City") compliance with the requirements governing types of services allowed or unallowed; eligibility; matching, level of effort; reporting; special tests and provisions related to the Community Development Block Grant and Airport Improvement Program; claims for advances and reimbursements; and amounts claimed or used for matching that are applicable to each of its major federal financial assistance programs, which are identified in the accompanying schedule of federal and state financial assistance, for the year ended September 30, 1991, The management of the City is responsible for City compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance with those requirements batted on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, Government Auditlpg Standards, Issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and Office of Management and Budget Circular A-128, "Audits of State and Local Governments." Those standards and OMB Circular A•128 require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about wl~. • material noncompliance w'th the requirements referred to above occurred, An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about City compliance with those requirements, We believe that , our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the City complied, in all material respects, with the requirements governing types of services allowed or unallowed; eligibility; matching, level of effort; reporting; special tests and provisions related to Community Development Block Grant and Airport Improvement Program; claims for advances and reimbursements; and amounts claimed or used for matching that are applicable to each of its major federal financial assistance programs for the year ended September 30, 1991. t~ a + December 20, 1991 hlfemaiional 1 `f 1 r 1 rs~ rr?~ b Deloitte & buche Suite 1400 telephone: (214) 720-8100 Lincoln Plaza ITT Telex: 4995028 ;low 600 North Akard Street Dallas, Tuxas 75201-3302 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS ~ APPLICABLE TO NONMAJOR FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM TRANSACTIONS The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City Council of the City of Denton, Texas; In connection with our audit of the 1991 general purpose financial statements of the City of Denton, Texas (the "City") and with our study and evaluation of the City's Internal control structures used to administer federal financial assistance programs, as required by Office of Management and Budget Circular A-126, "Audits of State and Local Governments," we selected certain transactions applicable to certain nonmajor federal financial assistance programs for the year ended September 30, 1991, As required by OMB Circular A-126, we have performed auditing procedures to test compliance with the requirements governing types of services allowed or unallowed; eligibility; and special tests and provisions applicable to those transactions. Our procedures were substantially Itss in scope than an audit, the objective of which Is the expression of an opinion on City compliance with these requirements. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. With respect to the items tested, the results of those procedures disclosed no material Instances of noncompliance with the requirements listed in the preceding paragraph. With respect to items not tested, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City had not complied, in all material respects, with those requirements. This report is Intended for the Information of the City Council, management and appropriate federal and state agencies. This restriction is not intended to limit the distribution of this report, which is a matter of public record. December 20, 1991 C l~ F% RT C - i iI I nlefnatia ial 10- x 4 ti CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Questioned Program Find in¢lNoncompliance Costs CURRENT-YEAR COMMENTS None • STATUS OF PRIOR- YEAR COMMENTS Texas Historical Commission Grant Number $133 48-89-4065,007 Finding; Incomplete documentation was maintained to support the in-kind services provided to match the grant funds received Status; The Planning Department has revised their recordkeeping procedures in order to document all _,i in-kind expenditures. .a a. -ll- C HI F 4 Deloitte & Touche Suite 1400 Telephone (214) 7208100 Lincoln Plaza ITT Telex: 4995628 500 North Akard Street Dallas, Texas 7b201-3302 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROLS (ACCOUNTING AND ADMINISTRATIVE) tow The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Denton, Texas: We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Denton, Texas (the "City") for the year ended September 30, 1991, and have issued our report thereon dated December 20, 1991, As part of our audit, we made a study and evaluation of the Internal control systems, including applicable Internal administrative controls, used in administering federal financial assistance programs to the extent we considered necessary to evaluate the systems as required by generally accepted auditing standards, Government Auditing Standards, Issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the Single Audit Act of 1984 and the provisions of Office of Management and Budget Circular A-128, "Audits of State and Local Governments," For the purpose of this report, we have classified the significant Internal accounting and administrative controls used In administering federal financial assistance programs in the following categories: Accounting applications: Billings Receivables Cash receipts Purchasing and receiving Accounts payable Cash disbursements Payroll Inventory control Property and equipment General ledger 'A''.,atiw ti hlf8li'1111101)(11 - 12- ri r k b F~~ -.t - Controls used In administering federal programs: General Requirements: .1 - Political activity - Davis-Bacon Act - Civil rights - Cash management Federal financial reports - Allowable costsleost principles ` - Drug-Free Workplace Act i - Administrative requirements Specific Requirements: v+° - Types of services Eligibility Matching, level of effort Reporting Special requirements, if any Claims for advances and reimbursements .i Amounts claimed or used for matching The management of the City is responsible for establishing and maintaining the internal control systems used in administering federal financial assistance programs. In fulfilling that responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of control procedures. The objectives of internal control systems used In administering federal financial assistance programs are to provide management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that, with respect to federal financial assistance programs, resource use is consistent with laws, regulations and policies; resources are safeguarded against waste, loss and misuse; and reliable data are obtained, maintained and fairly disclosed in reports. Because of Inherent limitations in any system of internal accounting and administrative controls used In administering federal financial assistance programs, errors or Irregularities may nevertheless occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of the systems to future periods Is subject to the risk that procedures may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the procedures may deteriorate. Our study included all of the applicable control categories listed above. During the year ended September 30, 1991, the City expended 75% of its total federal financial assistance under major federal financial assistance programs. With respect to Internal control systems used in administering major federal firancial assistance programs, our study and evaluation included considering the types of errors and irregularities that could occur, determining the internal control procedures that should prevent or C Deloitte & 13- Touche a N detect such errors and irregularities, determining whether the necessary procedures are prescribed and are being followed satisfactorily and evaluating any weaknesses. With respect to the internal control systems used solely in administering the nonmajor federal financial assistance programs of the City, our study and evaluation was limited to a preliminary review of the systems to obtain an understanding of the control environment and the flow of transactions through the accounting system. Our study and evaluation of the internal control systems used solely in administering the nonmajor federal financial assistance programs of the City did not extend beyond this preliminary review phase. Our study and evaluation was more limited than would be necessary to express an opinion on the • internal control systems used in administering the federal financial assistance programs of the City. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the internal control systems used In administering the federal financial assistance programs of the City. Further, we do not express an opinion on the internal control systems used in administering the major federal financial assistance programs of the 04 City. Also, our audit, made in accordance with the standards mentioned above, would not necessarily disclose material weaknesses in the internal control systems used solely in administering nonmajor federal financial assistance programs. However, our study and evaluation and our audit disclosed no condition that we believe to be a material weakness in relation to a federal financial assistance program of the City. This report is intended solely for the use of the City Council, management and appropriate federal and state agencies and should not be used for any other purpose. This restriction is not Intended to limit the distribution of this report, which Is a matter of public record. r December 20, 1991 Debi & ~ 14-Twhe f v rj ,r 1 INFORMATION PRESENTED TO COUNCIL AT MEETING OF 1-21-92. 51,5-4-'a CITY of AENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76101 January 21, 1992 Apanda 1Jn. __.r c Aponda Ron~__ The Honorable Mayor and City Council 0310 and City Manager After review and discussion of the preliminary draft of the auditor's management letter on Tuesday, January 14, 1992, staff has prepared the following responses relating to recommendations presented. FINANCIAL PLANNING observation: The current economic situation has created a turbulent environment for elected officials. Many cities are faced with declining revenue bases and have been forced to increase taxes, reduce fund balances and/or initiate cost reduction measures. This existing environment has accentuated the need for development of financial plans projecting both operational revenues and expenditures beyond the scope of the current budget process. This planning may enable the City to develop a formal strategy for identifying service levels and funding service delivery in future years. Recommendation: Develop a financial plan, covering at least five years, to be utilized as a goal for budget development and resource allocation. The City should revise this plan as an integral part of its annual planning and goal- setting sessions. Response: At present, the City Council prepares a 5-year Strategic Plan annually which addressee major fiscal policies. In addition the Council has also adopted financial policies such as approving only a balanced budget and retaining a General Fund balance of 88 to 108 of annual expenditures in an effort to assure financial health while not binding future year's Councils. Although most major area< eve been addressed, the expansion of some financially related policies may b +ropriate. ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING FOR INSURANCE PROGRAMS observation: The Governmental Accounting Standard Board ("GASS") has issued Statement No. 10, "Accounting and Financial Reporting for Risk Financing and Related Insurance Issues," addressee accounting and reporting requirements for governmental entities which are self-insured or retain certain insurance risks. Since the City is self-insured for certain insurance programu, the requirements of this statement are applicable for financial statements for periods beginning after June 15, 1994 however, early application is encouraged. Statement No. 10 will require the following accounting and reporting considerations: i 8171566.8200 DIFW METRO 434.1529 t r. ti ;j i Responses to Management Letter Year Ended 1991 Page 2 ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING FOR INSURANCE PROGRAMS (continued) • The activities related to self-insurance must be reported In the general fund or an internal service fund. • • The total premiums charged to other funds should be based on an actuarial method or historical cost information and adjusted over a reasonable period of time so that internal service fund revenues and expenses are approximately equal. • Deficits in the insurance program must be funded over a reasonable period of time and disclosed in the notes to financial statements. • Disclosure in the notes to financial statements will include, among otherst • Basis of estimating liabilities • carrying amount of liabilities • Reconciliation of changes in aggregate liabilities for two years • If the City participates in public entity risks pools, then depending on the level of risk assumed, the disclosure and accounting requirements may be extensive. Recommendation: The application of GASB Statement No. 20 may require procedural and reporting changes in the City's accounting procedures. An evaluation should be performed as to the impact of this statement and procedures established to implement such changes prior to the effective date. Response: The Accounting Department continually monitors proposed and issued statements of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board and their effect on the city's policies and procedures. Early implementation of the application of GASB Statement No. 10 is planned for fiscal year 1993-94. MFG': AND DRAINAGE FEES , Observation: Under recent legislation, the City is authorized to levy fees to support storm water drainage improvement projects. These fees can be utilized to fund construction of or improvement to infrastructure necessary to transport storm water and can also be utilized to ensure compliance with state and federal clean water regulations. We understand that the City has formed a committee to address the impact of this legislation. Recommendattont Consider conducting a study to establish equitable fees which can be utilized for drainage projects and/or improvements to provide compliance with mandated laws and regulations. Key elements should include: • Land use by type • Pervious and Impervious area(s) • Runoff coefficient • Rate structure Response: The completed Analysis of Storm Water Utility Funding Options of the Storm Water Utility Committee was presented to the Public Utility Board on Wednesday, January 15, 1992. C h S `i I Responses to Management Letter Year Ended 1991 Page 3 ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES AND ISSUES Physical Inventory Procedures Observation: The city physically counts ito inventory every year-end, wh±.ch involves many man-hours and is quite time-consuming. Previously, the inventory software made it difficult to perform physical counts it times other than year- end. However, the software has been modified to permi`, counts during the year. Recommendation: Perform the physical inventory counts on a cyclical basis throughout the year to reduce the time demands at year-end. This would also allow personnel to perform other year-end duties. Cyclical counts also identify significant variances or shrinkage in a timely manner. Responset The Finance staff agree that cyclical counts of inventory could be beneficial and have made this recommendation each of the past two years. As detailed in the observation, the accounting software was incapable of segregated shut downs until recent modifications. implementation is scheduled to occur in the second quarter of this fiscal year. Review of Permits Issued Observationt The City issues prenumbered permits for such things as building construction. However, no reconciliation is performed between the permits issued and the cash collected. such situation could allow permits to be issued for which no monies were received or for which the monies were misapplied. Recommendation: cash collections for permits should be reconciled to the number of permits issued on a regular basis. This type of reconciliation could be performed by the newly created internal audit position. Responsei Finance staff will coordinate procedure development for the reconciliation of permits with the Building Inspection Department. Purchasing Policies Observationt A considerable amount of time was spent by City staff developing , and writing the City's current purchasing policy and administrative procedures manual. However, the manual has been in draft form for over a year and has not been formally published. Recommendation: The city should formally publish its current purchasing policy and administrative procedures manual In order to avoid any potential complaints or misunderstandings. Responses The City will formally publish its current purchasing policy and administrative procedures manual. Fixed Assets Inventory Observationt The City has performed periodic physical inventories of fixed assets purchases with federal funds. However, a complete physical inventory has not been performed in several years for all City fixod assets. i c~ r, v v ~v t Y Responses to Management Letter Year Ended 1991 Page 4 ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES AND I88U%i~ (continued) Recommendations Perform a complete City-wide fixed asset physical inventory to ensure that fixed assets continue to be accurately reflected in the. financial statements. Periodic physical inventories establish additional control over the city's fixed assets and assist in evaluating the City's insurance needs. Responset Staff agree that a complete City-wide fixed asset physical inventory should be completed and prepare annual budget packages which have not been funded. Another package will he presented during the 1992-93 annual budget process. INTERNAL AUDIT Observations Currently, the City relies on its system of internal accounting control and the annual independent audit to provide assurance that the financial statements are fairly presented, While this reliance is adequate, an internal audit function would provide an additional control level and establish a system which would better monitor operations and the accounting system of the City. We understand that the City has provided for an internal audit function which will report to the Executive Director of Finance. The city is commended for recognizing the importance of an internal audit position. Recommendations Due to the type of pr.>jects that will initially be undertaken by the internal auditor, and to ensure the most efficient use of this resource, this reporting arrangement should be appropriate at this time. However, the annual internal audf.t plan as well as all reports issued by the internal auditor should be submitted to the Audit Committee of the city Council, Response: The annual internal audit plan as well as all internal audit reports will be submitted to the Audit Committee of the City Council as they are issued, AFF0013E ,r v, INFORMATION PRE,SENTEP TO. COUNCIL AT, MEETING OF 1w21-92. I'aonda No.. Agendallc(n._ r_ 4e CITY OF DENT4N, TEXAS l~`~`lllt ll l l l l 11111/,% AA I k 4 I I ~ l .4 r / I ' ni . I i' SS 41/1 ~Il~l1l ` Conlprchenai~e %~ulldal T~nallelal Repor! Tor the dear Tilde) September 30, 199'1 r J,n .ur~ r0`- 4 1 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1991 Prepared by the CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS FINANCE DEPARTMENT CITY MANAGER Lloyd V. Harrell EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE John F! McGrane M I r TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTORY SECTION: Transmittal Letter ,i Certificate of Achievement , , , x 4 Organization Chart ,,,,xl List of Officials ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,xii FINANCIAL SECTION: Auditors' Report ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1 General Purpose Financial Statements. Combined Balance Sheet - All Fend Types and Account Groups , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 2 Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - All Governmental Fund Types and Expendable Trust Funds , , , , , , , , , , , , , , g Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual - General, Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds ,10 Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings - All Proprietary Fund Types , , , , , , , , , , , , ,12 Combined Statement of Cash Flows - All Proprietary Fund Types , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 14 Notes to Financial Statements ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,19 Combining and Individual Fund Financial Statements-and Schedules- CombiningBalanceSheet - Alf Special Revenue Funds ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,48 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes In Fund Balances - All Special Revenue Funds , , , , , , , , , 46 Combining Balance Sheet - All Capltal Projects Funds , , . , Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes In Fund Balances - All Capital Projects Funds .54 Combining Balance Sheet - All Enterprise Funds , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 58 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings - All Enterprise Funds , , , , . , , , , , , , , , 62 Combinin) Statement of Cash Flows - All E~fr prise Funds , , , , , , , 64 Sched, a ,f Revenues, Erpenses and Cha- d, s In Retained Earn, ds - Budget anI :tual - AC'-'ntk,prlse Funds , , , , , , , , , , , , .68 Combinir,f Balance Sheet - Utility System . , , , , , , , , , , , . . . . , , , . , 70 Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings - Utility System , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 74 Combining Statement of Cash Flows - Utility System . , . , , , , , , , , , 76 Combining Balance Sheet - All Internal Service Funds , , , . , , , , , . . . .82 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings- All Internal Servlce Funds ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,84 I l %n x Page Combining Statement of Cash Flows - All Internal Service Funds 86 Schedule of Revenues, Fxpenses and Changes in Retained Earnings - Budget and Actual - Working Capital Fund 88 Combining Balance Sheet - All Trust and Agency Funds 90 Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities - All Agency Funds 92 4 Supplemental Financial Information- General Fund - Schedule of Expenditures - Budget and Actual 95 ST4177SMAL SECTION fUNAUDITEM Table 1 General Government Expenditures by Function Last Ten Fiscal Years 108 2 General Revenues by Source Last Ten Fiscal Years 110 3 Property Tax Levies and Collections Last Ten Flscal Years 112 4 Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property Last Ten Fiscal Years ........................114 5 Property Tax Rates and Tax Levies - All Overlapping Governments Last Ten Fiscal Years .........................116 6 Special Assessment Collections Last Ten Fiscal Years 117 7 Ratio of Net General Bonded Debt to Assessed Value and Net Bonded Debt Per Capita Last Ten Fiscal Year; 118 8 Computation of Legal Debt Margin ................................12.0 9 Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt . 121 10 Ratio of Annual Debt Service Expenditures for General Bonded Debt to Total General Expenditures Last Ten Fiscal Years 122 11 Revenue Bond Debt Service Coverage - Last Ten Fiscal Years 124 12 Property Value, Construction and Bank Deposits - Last Ten Fiscal Years 12E. 13 Principal Taxpayers ...........................................129 14 Schedule of Insurance In Force .......................................130 15 Demographic Statistics - Last Ten Flscal Years 132 16 Miscellaneous Statistlcal Data .........................................134 c t~ C W 4 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS e'1 C Comprehenslve Annual Flnenclal Report T V~ F~ CITY of DENTONr TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DEN TON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 January 21, 1992 T0; The Honorable Mayor, Members of City Council and Citizens of the City of Denton c Submitted herewith Is a copy of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the City of Denton for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1991. The responsibility for both the accuracy of the presented Information and the completeness and fairness of the presentatlon of the data, including all disclosures, rests with the City. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the enclosed data are accurate in all material respects and are reported in a manner designed to present fairly the end results of operations of the various funds and account groups of the City. All disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain an understanding of the City's financial activities have been Included. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report is presented in three sections: introductory, financial and statistical. The Introductory section includes this transmittal letter, the City's organizational chart, and a list of princlpai officials. The financial section Includes the general purpose flnancial statements, the combining and individual fund and account group financial statements and schedules, as well as the Auditor's Report on the flnanclal statements and schedules. The statistical section Includes selected financial and demographic Information, generally represented on a multiyear bnsls. This report Includes all funds and account groups of the City. The City provides a full range of services, which include police and fire protection; sanitation services; the construction and maintenance of highways, streets and Infra-structure; and water, wastewater and electric utilities. Economic Condition and Outlook The local economic conditions have hr,en affected by the state and national recessionary trends. The total ad vaiorem tax base fell from 82,124,615,827 In 1989 to 82,094,143,126 in 1990, However, there were some local business additlons that have contributed to the Improvement of the tax base. Sales tax recelpts grew from 85,161,383 at September 30, 1990, to 85,342,618 at September 30, 1991. In March, 1991, the new 81.5 million, 25,000 square foot Camping World facility opened. Its first quarterly sales amounted to 81,3 million, In addition, three restouran#x, Red Lobster, Kentucky Fried Chicken, and Arby's opened new stores with a total valuation of over 81,2 million, Two local companies, Petarbllt and Safety Clean, had plant expansions of 9,735 and 69,106 square feet respectively. Announcements of the future openings of Albertson's and Food Lion grocery stores should add an additional 120,000 square feet of new commercial space to the City's tax roll. In k v. 4 =i I. Transmittal Lotter (continued) addition, Manufactures Retail Outlets, Inc., (MRO), has announced plans to open a retail outlet center In Denton. When completed, the Center will comprise 302,000 square feet and will have approximately 100 name brand manufacturer's outlet stores. The complex anticipates gross sales of 962,583,702 when complete. With these types of commercial activities occurring within the City it is anticipated that the economy will continue to grow over the next several years, The economic effect of the new Alliance Airport in Denton and Tarrant County should provide future economic activities. Alliance Airport Is located only 15 miles south of Denton on Interstate Highway System 35 West, M. Ray Perryman Consultants, Inc. projects that Alliance Airport's economic Impact should include 9,164 permanent jobs within Fort Worth PMSA, 9702.8 million additional local spending and $234,4 million in employee earnings. c Major Initiatives Although the future looks promising because of the economic development activities f that are occurring within the City, the preparation of the budget for fiscal year 1990.91 was a difficult process, The City, encountering tremendous growth in the early 1980's, began experiencing only limited growth in 1989. In preparing the budget, the City knew that fiscal year 1990.91 would be one of continuing challenge. Past growth had placed enormous strains on manpower, equipment and Infrastructure, The flow of revenues that had accompanied growth trends was stagnating by the slowing economic conditions throughout the area, Revenue bases that would typically be expanding by annual increases of 10% to 15",6 had slowed to 1 % to 5%, and in some cases were actually declining, It was anticipated that this situation would only be a short term condition due to a more diversified economy and, as hoped, the metroplex economy Is once again on the upswing, Commitments by large commercial firms and other developments mentioned earlier will add significantly to the employment and revenue bases, Long term projections for Denton still indicate continued growth and expansion well beyond the year 2000. The 1990.91 budget challenge was to stay poised and ready to handle the future expansion without drastically reducing current service levels. In all funds, personnel additions Included those positions that were determined a priority by the City Council, were absolutely essential, or would pay for themselves through Increased revenue collections, In addition to the uncertainty of federal, state and local economies, a conservative approach was taken In budgeting both revenues and expenditures, Despite a generally conservative stanca, the budget maintained the level of service which the citizens of Denton had come to expect, as well as included some major Initiatives as determined by City Council, The budget for fiscal year 1990.91 could be viewed as a "cutback" budget. Overall expenditure increases were reduced to a minimum, while staff looked at a minor tax Increase in order to fund only current level services. The tax Increase was approximately $.02 below the rate necessary to bring revenues to the 1989.90 levels, All salary performance provisions and market adjustments were eliminated, While this is obviously not the type of cutback that our organization can sustain in the long run, It is anticipated that with the economic development activities discussed earlier that property values and local economy will rebound wlthfn the next year, For the Future - As Indicated earlier, the City has embarked upon an economic development program with the philosophy of attracting Industrial prospects and expanding existing companies. The establishment In 1987.68 of the Economic Development Office and the development of a utility rate Incentive program should help facilitate future growth and attract industrial prospects like those mentioned previously, The Utilities Department has also established i' r. .._.,.111 Transmittal Letter (continued) within Its Capital improvements program (CIP), a $500,000 assistance program to aid In the construction of water and sewer fines for industrial and residential development. In addition, the Planning Department has developed the Maln Street Program, which began in !1,a 1988.89 budget year, The Coordinator works in conjunction with the State's Main Street Program In order to revitalize the downtown area. During fiscal year 1986.87, a five year, $21, 637,000 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) was approved by Council. A voter approved bond safe authorized the sale of bonds to finance the program with the bonds to be Issued over a period of years. Fiscal year 1990-91 would have been the fifth year of 1986.87 CIP, and an unissued balance of $10,922,000 remains unsold but authorized by the voters. Because of general fund revenue shortfalls and the commltment to the voters not to ralse taxes to fund the CIP, certain projects were rescheduled. ' In brief the 1990.91 proposed budget recommends that projects within the program representing significant operation and maintenance costs were put on hold to a future date. These projects include the recreation centers, the library expanslon and a law enforcement center. Other street, drainage, traffic, and athletic field projects were Initiated pursuant to the current and extended seven year CIP program. The Utility Department: Water, Wastewater, and Electric Departments 04 continued with their Capital Improvement Frogram which continued to replace necessary items within the Utility Department. In addition, the Utillties have reviewed necessary expansion plans which Include building a now water treatment plant In the future, This Improvement, along with the opening of Flay Roberts Water Reservoir in 1988.89, will provide adequate water supply well beyond the year 2000. Fine nclal Information The management team of the City Is responsible for establishing and maintaining an Internal control structure designed to ensure that the assets of the City are protected from loss, theft or misuse and to ensure that adequate accounting data are compiled to allow for the preparation of financial statements In conformity with continued generally accepted accounting principles. The Internal control structure is designed to provide reasonable but not absolute assurance that these objectives are met. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that (1) the cost of the controls should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived, and, (2) the valuation of cost and benefits requires estimates and judgments by management. Single Audit As a recipient of federal and state assistance, the City also Is responsible for Insuring that an adequate Internal control structure is In place to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations related both to the state and federal programs. This Internal control structure Is subject to periodic evaluatlon by management and the outside auditors of the City's financial statements. As a part of the City's single audit, tests are made to determine the adequacy of the Internal control structure Including that portion related to the federal financial assistance programs, as well as to determine that the City has compiled with applicable laws and regulations. IN - 6 ti Y. it e R, Transmittal Letter (continued) The result of the City's single audit of the fiscal year ended September 30, 1991 provided no Instances of material weaknesses in the Internal control structure or significant violations of applicable laws and regulations. Budgeting Controls The City maintains budgetary controls to ensure compliance of legal provisions embodied in the annual appropriated budget approved by the City Council. Activities of the General Fund, Special Revenue Fund (Recreation Fund only), Debt Service Fund, the Enterprise Funds and the Internal Service Fund (Working Capital Fund only) are included in the annual operating budget. Projected financial plans are adopted for the Capital Improvement Funds. The ` level of budgetary control (that is, the level at which expenditures cannot legally exceed the appropriated amount) is established by function activity within an Individual fund. The City also maintains an encumbrance accounting system as one technique of accomplishing budgetary controls, and a technique of budgetary "lock out" which will prevent a transaction from exceeding,. legally appropriated budgetary amounts. As demonstrated by the statements and schedules included In the financial section of this report, the City continues to meet its responsibility for sound financial management. General Governmental Functions The following schedule represents a summary of General Fund, Special Revenue Funds and Debt Service Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1991 and the amount and percentages of increase/(decrease) In relation to prior year's revenues. The amounts In this schedule are expressed in thousand of dollars. Increase Percent of (Decrease) % of Increase Revenues Amount Total from 1990 (Decrease) Taxes $19,756 76.66 4 759 4.00 Licenses and Permits 243 .94 (18) (6.90) Franchise Fees 615 2.39 38 6.59 Fines and Forfeitures 986 3.83 (272) (21.62) Fees for Service 1,288 5.00 (93) (6.73) Interest 643 2.49 (105) (14.04) Intergovernmental 1,245 4.83 (236) (15.94) Miscellaneous 996 3.86 (407) (29.01) TOTAL $25,772 100,00% $(334) 1128% IV - \ i~ 1 Transmittal Letter {continued} a The most signifleant Increase In General Fund revenues from a contlnual source was again in the tax category. This Increase Is attributable to an Increase in property tax rate. The property tax value decreased marginally by approximately $30.5 million as compared to the 1889 tax year, and the tax rate was increased from $.6183 to $.6551 per $100 of assessed valuation. The second largest tax source Is sales tax which Increased $180,000 from the prior year, The City receives 1 % of the 7 1/4% sales tax collected on sales occurring within the city, The category of revenues that is associated with lvlunlripa} fines, (i.e., warrant tees, court costs, police fines, etc.) was down by $270,000 because of P. lengthy redesign of court procedures necessary due to several higher court decisions defining the probable cause needed for warrant Issuance. A The miscellaneous category of revenues decreased primarily due to decreases in auction proceeds and charges for street cuts. The following schedule presents a summary of General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, and Debt Service Fund expenditures for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1991, and a the percentage of increase/(decrease) In relation to prior year amounts. Once again, the amounts slated In this schedule are expressed in thousands, Increase % of Expenditures Percent of (Decrease) Increase Amount Total from 1990 {Decrease) Current: General Government $ 91868 29,76 $(156) (1,56) Public Safety 10,983 33.12 798 7,84 Public Works 4,612 13,91 (63) {1,35} Parks and Recreation 2,648 7,98 2 .08 Capital Outlay 235 .70 (339) (59,08) Debt Services; Principal 2,715 8.19 462 19.97 Interest and Fiscal Chargas 2 105 6.35 (218) (9.38) TOTAL $33,166 100.00% $ 476 1.469x As in the prior year, the primary reasons for the Increase in operating expenditures were salary and wage pay for performance Increases and Increased health Insurance costs. The significant increase In debt service expenditures was due to debt Issuance In 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990 and 1991. In December, 1986, voters approved a $21.6 million Capital Improvement Program that was to be phased over a five-year period. v- c1 »u„ e 1 1 r Transmittal Letter (continued) 4 In March, 1991, $590,000 of Certificates of Obligation were Issued for improvementu to the City's Municipal Building and vehicles, machinery and equipment purchases. General Fund Balance The fund balance of the General Fund decreased by 2.0% in 1991. The fund balance provides the City with an average of 44 working days of expenciltures. However, $398,312 of the balance is reserved for encumbrances. In addition, within the unreserved portion ' of the fund balance, $518,649 of the balance Is designated for subsequent year expenditures. Proprietary Operations Enterprise Operations The City's Enterprise Operations consist of a utility system which provides for electric, water and wastewater services, The Enterprise Operations also include sanitation services for residential, commercial and landfill operations. In the Water Fund there was a 12% rate Increase which rslsed the average cost of water from $2.47 per 1,000 gallons of water in 1990 to $2,78 per 1,000 gallons in 1991, Wastewater/sewer rates Increased 9%, This new rate will cause the average monthly residential sewer bill to Increase from $15.00 to 816.37, resulting in a $1.37 per month Increase. Electric rates experienced no Increases for the year, In the Sanitation Fund there was a rate Increase of 6% for all customers, This increase in residential rates will result In an Increase of $.56 per month for each residential customer. The rates Increased from 89.39 per month to $9.95 per month. The commercial dumpster customers Increased from $1,02 per month to $17.76 per month depending on the size and frequency of pick up. Internal Service Operations The Internal Service Operations consist of the Working Capital and Motor Pool Funds. The Working Capital Fund accounts for the financing of goods and services provided ry the Municipal Garage, Warehouse and Machine Shop to other City departments. The Motor Pool Fund Is responsible for the purchase of City vehicles not budgeted in other funds. Fiduciary Operations Expendable Trust Fund The Employee Insurance Fund accounts for the accumulation of resources for the payment of Insurance policies and employee Insurance claims still outstanding, r VI t n r ai l 1 ' 1 r Transmittal Letter (continued) Agency Funds The Agency Funds consist of Payroll and Deferred Compensation, The Payroll Fund Is responsible for the collection and payment of the City's payroll and associated ilabliltles, The Deferred Compensation Fund accounts for City employees' investments in a deferred compensation plan, Debt Administration At September 30, 1991, the City had $24,566,730 in General Obligation Bonds outstanding, $55,643,008 in a Note Payable to the Corps of Engineers, $4,620,000 In Certificates of Obligation and $55,710,000 of Utility System Revenue Bonds. The City has maintained an , "Aa" rating from Standard and Poor's Corporation and an "A•1" rating from Moody's Investors Service, Inc, on Its General Obligation Bonds. Utility Revenue System Bonds have maintained an "A" rating from Moody's Investors Service, Inc., and an "A+" rating from Standard and Poor's Corporation, As was mentioned earlier, the City has developed a plan for Issuing annual General Obligation Bonds that were approved by the voters In a capital improvements plan. The Certificates of Obligatlon are used for short-term construction projects and financing motor pool vehicles. Cash Management The City follows an active program of cash management, keeping all temporarily idle funds In Interest bearing accounts, These accounts are in the form of NOW accounts, certificates of deposits, Local Government Investment Pools, Treasury Issues and Federal government agency Instrumentalities. On August 31, 1991 the annualized yield on Investments was 7.58%, compared to 8.22% and 8.72% for the same period in 1990 and 1989 respectively, investable funds as of September 10, 1991 were $77 million, which is an increase from $75 million In 1990 and $56.2 million In 989. Investment maturities have been lengthened from Be days in 1987 to 984 days In 1991, As of September 30, 1991, the City's average yield on investments was 7,50% compared t, 8,26% for the same period in 1990. The City's Investment policy Is to maximize yield with a mirsmal amount of risk while maintaining an actively competitive yield on its portfolio, Accordingly, all of the City's deposits are either insured by the Federal Depnslt Insurance Corporation, the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, or are collateralized by governmental securities, All collateral on the deposits Is held by a third party financial Institution's trust department In the City of Denton's name, The investments of the Deferred Compensation Fund In which the City participates are held separately from those of other City funds by an outslde trustee appointed by the City, State statutes authorize the City to Invest in obligations of the U.S. Treasury and U,S, agencies, obligations of the State of Taxes and related agencies, repurchase agreements and municipal securities of any state rated "A" or above by Standard and Poor's Corporation or Moody's Investors Service, Inc. V11 i c_ F t; fs Transmittal Letter (continued) Risk Management During 1991, the City continued its risk management program for the City of Denton, In 1987, the City contracted to have an actuarial study to project the City's workers' compensation and liability costs over a five year period, The following schedule represents the projected costs as done by the actuarlal study compared to the actual costs that the City experienced as of September 30, 1991. This schedule, as presented, Is expressed in thousands. Workers' General Program m ngaagn Liability 9= Transfer o FY '91 Projected $268 $371 $639 $55 FY '91 Actual 290 37 327 55 As part of the comprehensive plan, the City purchases property and casualty insurance along with participating In a self-insurance fund for its workers' compensation benefits and general liability. Reserves are being accumulated in the fund to meet potential future losses. In addition, the City's risk manager has Initiated various programs to control risk and to train employees In safety standards for the prevention of future losses by the City, independent Audit The City Charter requires an independent audit of the accounts of the City by an independent auditor, The accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche was selected by the City Council to perform the annual audit. In addition to meeting the requirements set forth in the City Charter, the audit was also designed to meet the requirements of the Federal Single Audit Act of 1984 and related OMB Circular A-128, Awards The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City for Its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the flscal year ended September 30, 1990. In order to be awarded the Certificate of Achievement In Financial Reporting, the City published an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report. This report satisfies both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements, The Certificate of Achievement Is held for a period of one year only. We believe that our current Comprehensive Annual Financial Report continues to most the Certificate of Achievement requirements and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine Its eligibility for another certificate. The City has also received the GFOA's award for Distinguished Budget Presentation for Its 1991 annual appropriation budget, receiving Its highest rating to date. In order to qualify for the Dlstingulshad Budget Presentation Award, the City's budget document was judged to be proficient In several categories Including policy documentation, financial planning, andorganization. The City has submitted its 1992 budget to the GFOA to determine Its eligibility for another certificate. We believe that it continues to meet the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award crlierla, viii - C t 4 , r. 1 I 11 ll si Transmittal Letter (continued) I ~ Acknowledgments I would like to thank all of the Finance Department staff, the department directors and division heads for their diligent efforts in the preparation of the annual financial report, A tremendous amount of time and effort went into the development of this report, especially by the Finance Administration staff, I would also like to thank the City Council. It Is their strong leadership and faithful support of the City that helped make the presentation of this repoll possible. John F, McGrane Kathy L. DuBose 400 Executive Director of Finance Director of Accounting & Budget Operations AAA00254 A Ix . \ fr.• I~ r r r ~ Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presented to City of Denton,` Texas For Its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 1990 A Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting is Presented by the Govemment FirmcW Cfficm Association of the United States am Canada to govemment units and public employee retirement systems whose comprehensive annual fkwwW reports (CAFR's) achieve the highest standards in government acebunting and financial reporting, ~ru Nr~ e~..u. President Alecut Director X- t~ I CITY OF DENTON List of Principal Officials September 30, 1901 ELECTED OFFICIALS Title Name Mayor Bob Castleberry Mayor Pro•Tem Jane Hopkins " Councilmember Jim Alexander Councilmember Margaret Smith ,ra Councilmember Mark Chew Councilmember Harold Perry Councilmember John Trent CITY OFFICIALS Title Name City Manager Lloyd V. Harrell Deputy City Manager Rick Svehla Executive Director for Finance John F. McGrane Executive Director for Utllities R. E. Nelson Executive Director of a Planning and Community Development Frank Robbins Executive Director for Munlclpai Services and Economic Development Betty McKean City Attorney Debra Drayovitch Police Chief Michael Jez Fire Chief John L. Cook City Secretary Jennifer Walters xii t CITY OF DENTON ORGANIZATIONAL CHART CI II2Y N5 or OENION CITY COUNCIL CNY AIICANEY MNNCIPAI JUDO[ CITY MANAGER GENERAL COVEMMENI _--i I CIrf SCCWIMY GEC(Ilhi ONICYgf (Yrcmr amcim EXECWAK MMYCEWP EXEcurw DWCMR Or UINIII(f Cr MAWW Me KV o(my CRY MAKWA Of !WANG[ or MUN KAY/(CON D(Y f uraurr AoEArY MAAIwrYC AMMY !turf rE+wrt AOIW MUN SERV ADAAW [IEC.'YRR' uncRCY MIS/YC vw rx[ ALC101AYMt1 ai7l ?P unuivmrr- ~ MNrER V7✓IIIAC7 C'CWIANr'rYOMECPKN EKIYCERPIC/RiARS M/RCMIIfAVC/~IMREAYNrSE KRSCWMEY Ikw smw SiIPE[15 7RGAS1,py CLMIMpA17Y SEMICE$ AAbVAf CIfSTD1AFR SERN6E LA99WY PAY [M'MQYA(RrK SERV AN/MCp'+A( GINN17 AYlpR4AYAAN SERNC[S i~„ ~1 i I r COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OVERVIEW i f I Deloitte & buche _ Suite 1400 Telephone 1214) 720.8 100 Lincoln Plaza 1TT Telex: 4995628 500 North Akard Street Dallas, Texas 75201.3302 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Denton, Texas; We have audited the accompanying general u ' ("City"), as of September 30, 1991, and for they ear then ended,twhich are listedt in th De o table of etas contents, These general purpose financial statements are the responsibility of the City's management, audit, responsibility is to express an opinion on these general purpose financial statements based on our We conducted our audit In accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement, An audit includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion, f In our opinion, the general purpose financial statements present fairly, in all material res financial position of the City at September 30, 1991, and the results of Its operations and the rasthe h flows of its proprietary fund types for the year then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole. The combining and Individual fund and account group financial statements and schedules lists] in the foregoing table of contents are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the general purpose financial statements of the City. This additional Information 1s the responsibility of the City's management, Such additional Information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in our audit of the general purpose financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects when considered In +s relation to the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole, cat December 20, 1991 Member QRTInlerna~ional 1 798,dw lmuary 6, 1992 11:33 AM n 1.' 1-Z•1'. iA~.11~ V H T i CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i COMBINED BALANCE SHEET - ALL FUND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS SEPTEMBER 30 1991 i Governmental Fund Types A0SETS AN0 OTHER DEBITS General Speolsl Revenue Debt $a Moo capital Projects Cash and deposits (Note 2) 61,369,903 / 922,423 0644,408 6 4,57002 Investments (Note 2) 4,086,863 28,000 8,081,788 Receivables (net of allowances for unoolleotibles)- Taxes 632,338 e Accounts Unbllled utility service 41,471 Special assessments Accrued interest 84,620 118 116,491 cry Other 424,187 22,520 22,149 134,621 204,486 68,734 Due from other funds (Note 11) Due from other governments 109,920 1,287 i- Merchandise Inventory Deferred bond issuance costs Restricted assets (Note 4) Cash and deposits (Note 2) Investments (Note 21 Accrued interest Due from other funds (Note 111 Advanos to other funds Fired assets (net, where epplfcabla, 44~ of accumulated depreciation) (Note 3) { Amount avsi(sble In Debt Service Fund I Amount to be provided for retirement r of long-term liabilities Total Assets and Other DebiU 68,711,632 61,287,444 1688;680 012 859,8g1r' The accompanying notes to financial statements are an Integral part of this statement, { Comprehensive Annual Financlnl Report w l i ~ q {yy i! CITY OF DENTnN, TEXAS F)duclary Fund Totals proprietary Fund Types Types Account Groups (Memorandum Only) ~e Trust and General Fixed Genera) Long- September 30, September 30, Enterprise Internal Service Apenoy Assets Term Usbll)t(es 1991 _ 1980 6 1 464,992 41,238,410 4 It 4 8,110,338 d 2,204,416 28,743,226 A,236,269 3,540,003 48,714,13!+ 38,278,182 e 632,338 688,975 4,442,989 98,710 4,541,598 5,006,463 5,008,341 5,008,341 4,983,232 41,471 88,717 689,318 41,739 791,285 780,838 513,279 226,082 1,206,217 1,148,182 4,199,405 327,477 1,292,481 6,227,183 10,824,446 111,207 212,980 11330,895 1,684,920 31015,816 3,116,582 879,001 879,001 930,642 6,347,872 8,347,872 875,432 28,248,616 28,249,816 38,721,404 373,000 373,000 840,841 230,340 230,340 371,742 600,000 500,000 600,000 148,533,174 2,604,294 79,463,288 230,780,744 222,333,025 A 309,628 309,526 722,478 28,537,612 28,537,612 30,234,920 6229,920,366 $9,8161642 46,338,716 479,463,280 928,847,136 4376,819,644 $362,543,304 -3• - Comprehensive Annu61 Ffnenclel Report ~ t s} is ,V",1 10 t 4 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS r COMBINED BALANCE SHEET • ALL FUND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS (Continued) SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Governmental Fund Types LIABILITIES, EQUITY AND OTHER CREDfTB General Special Revenue Debt Service Capital Projects Liabilities Accounts payable and accrued expenses 4 638,940 b 162,688 ! 867 ll 4,779,403 Retalnege payable - 33,896 AocumulstGA unpaid compensated absences (Note 41 , Deposits 65,000 1 Payable from restdoted gusts (Note 4) Accounts payable and accrued expenses (Note 7) Retalnage payable s}~ Due to other funds (Note 11) Accrued Interest Revenue and general obligation bonds payable, current Due to otMrfunds Mole 11) 1,266,090 43,238 67,197 77,573 Other liabilities 9,351 Advance from Electric Deferred rawnuss 178,962 24,392 218,190 1,165 Leases payable (Notes 4 and 5) General obligation bonds payable (Nate 4) Certificates of obligation (Note 4) Revenue bonds payable (net of bond dleoount) (Note 4) Claims payable (Note BI Notes payable (Note 41 TotalUmbilitles $2,037,992 0 220,196 6 278,364 4 4,901,377 ^ Ths scoompenying notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement. •4• - Comprehensive Annual Financial Report i Pill N.- I/ ^~'LBEl Pt~lyy{, d- 1IR~p of ~t A CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS r Proprietary Fund Types Fiduciary and Types Account Groups Totals °'ummumm~ Memorandum Only) Enterprise Interne! SsMoe Trust and Consist Fixed Oenersl Lon . Agency Assets 9 September 30, September 30, Term Usb)lides 1881 1890 8 6,266,461 11,847,234 62,123,886 1 1 0 16,888,228 / 6,826,831 e 9,760 . 43,845 180,724 604,938 21,343 . 2,523,299 3,049,680 1,113,788 2,880,188 1,176,786 1,202,794 871,830 432,429 871,830 484,238 1,022, 913 432,428 107,894 T,478,904 1,022, 913 1,00D.000 1,478,884 1,570,448 3,627,160 3,882,043 3,627,160 3,022,860 27,121 92,348 . 6,434,810 10,298,187 600,000 8,361 9,351 600,000 500,000 422,689 424,370 ' 21,829 933,221 212,148 233,977 86,981 23,611,369 24,444,680 26,723,880 • 2,ols,eeB 2,600,332 4,620,000 5,2864000 52,206,000 ' 52,206,000 66,710,000 ' 702,707 , 66,843,008 702,707 923,469 6128,481,483 13,837,195 66,843,008 63,869,188 62,918,720 ! $28,847,138 11171,620,445 9189,822,380 C •6• c Comprehenalvo Annual Financial Report f ,i CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS_ COMBINED BALANCE SHEET • ALL FUND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS (Continued) SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Governmental Fund Types WON LIABILITIES, EQUITY AND OTHER CREDITS (uncial Speolal Revenue Debt Servlos Caphd Proleota Fund Equity: Contributed ooplial • From other munlcipalitlss 1 ' 1 or governmental unite In aid of construotlon Investment in general fixed assets • Retained earnings • I j Reserved for bond retlrsment (Note 4) Unreserved Fund belanaes • t Reserved for debt servioe 309,626 Reserved for snoumbrenaes 398,312 31,469 3,028,398 Reserved for a-pitel prolsots 4,931,878 Unreserved • Designated for subsequent years' expenditures 518,649 1,033,779 Undesignatsd 3,765,689 Total Equity and Other Credits 4,673,660 1,087,248 308,629 7,958,274 Total Uabilklem, Equity end other Credits 66,711,832 41,287,444 1586;880 - X612,8539,661 The aocompanying notes to finanolsl statements ars an Integral part of this statement. •9• Comprehensive Annual Flnanciel Report C t C, r - CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS r Proplatary Fund Types FlduTfary Fund msss~ Account Groups Tows {Memorandum Only) Enterprise Internal Service Trust and General Fixed Genera[ Long. September 30, September 30, Apenoy Assela Term Llebilitles 1891 1980 8 14,903,082 $4,315,037 $ 1 $ 8 18,218,118 0 18,070,268 21,802,264 e 21,862,254 21,432,283 78,463,288 79,453,288 78,123,207 10,697,850 36,907,016 1,363,410 10,697,850 10,441,788 iF , 38,270,426 22,743,468 309,626 722,476 17,088,672 3,466,179 2,327,019 22,000,648 32,343,796 1,554,428 1,272,202 3,419,986 7,178,684 6 101,438,873 5,876,447 ,244.486 3,418,995 79,463,288 ' 203,889,188 192,720,844 $22D,920,366 19,615,642 $8,338,716 $78,463,298 028,847,138 1376;819,844 $382,643,304 a 7- Comprehenslve Annual Flnenrlal Report C~ h M CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES AND EXPENDABLE TRUSTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 199,1 Govwnnwntal Fund Types ■ awarel Spada fbvenue Debi Srvlea Capital Projects REVENUES; Twts■ $16,362,151 4 $4,404,258 4 Licenses and permits 243,070 ' Franddss fees 814,940 ' Fines end fods@ure■ 806,632 4 Few for Iervlc" 680,389 607,447 ' Interest revenue 636,708 7,016 709,857 Intorgoveormentei 603,724 740,010 320,776 0.00 Contributions mile"aneous 806,885 187,943 2,626 676,530 Total Revenues 19,822,427 1,643,216 4,406,823 1,715,163 EXPENDITURES; - Currsm General Government 8,869,273 898,386 ' Pubtio a afety 10,840,524 142,236 PuMo works 4,513,382 99,044 ' Parke and rscrerlon 2,247,291 400,778 ' Other Capital outlay 182,968 51,824 4,330,418 Debt esrvlos • Principe! retksment 2,714,888 interest and fiscal Charges 2,106,106 Tate! Eepsndkure■ 26,753,408 1,1592,266 4,819,773 4,330,419 EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 16,830,9811 140,0491 1412,9601 12,616,2681 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES IUSESI Proceeds of long-term debt 165,810 9,009 200.000 Operating transfers in 6,839,644 210,974 - ' Operating trsnsfsn out 1240,9741 11610001 ' Trel Otter Fbwwi" Sources (Uses) 6,854,486 204,993 200,000 EXCESS OF REVENUES AND OTHER SOURCES OVER IUNDEN F-XPENDITURE9 AND OTHER USES 170,4861 1651934 (412,9601 12,416,2661 FUND BALANCE • October 1 4,760,045 911.314 722,476 10,373,630 FUND BALANCE , September 30 4 4,873 660 41,087,249 4 309,526 4 7,968,274 The moompenying not" to finenclel etrwnente we an Integral part of this statement, •B \ Comprehensive Annual Financial Report f. r, i~ CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Tor W lkirwandum o„ 1y1 Fldudary Fund Typo Yew Endwl ExpwW@Wo Trwt Saptwnbw 30, 1091 Saptwrbor 30, 1890 / 119,760,479 118,996,832 243,070 281,080 014,940 677,180 885,532 1,257,661 4 1, 207, 030 1, 381,006 246,108 1,699,745 11730,101 1,573,410 1,490,945 15.295 16,286 8,652 4,126,107 6087,980 5,405,882 4,300,068 31,874,287 31,170,205 9,807,069 10,024,207 10,982,759 10,194,010 4.612,408 4,674,572 2,048,007 2,946,602 3,232,005 3,232,006 4.161,802 4,506, 201 e,077.918 2,714,004 2,263,002 2,105,105 2,323,360 31232,005 40,727,930 42,346,209 1,164, 683 10,863,0431 111,107,0041 , 004,026 1,150,000 7,150,518 7,418,944 (05,0001 (340,9741 1641,101) 10610001 '7,174,400 8,027,843 1,0a91583 (1,879,1741 (3,130,1011 2,350,402 19,107,707 22,240,028 '.`131419,9951 117,428,593 -.410,107,707 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report ` 4 x l i r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN I LIND BALANCES • BUDGET AND ACTUAL GENERAL, SPECIAL REVENUE AND DEBT SERVICE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Ilk Osneral Fund Vriencs Famoble Budget Actual 1UnfavraWd REVENUES! Tutee 414,904,440 115,362,181 4 387,741 , Licenses and permits 246,816 243,070 (2,7481 Frsnch4e less 009,214 014,940 6,720 Fines wW leHeltures 1,370076 986,632 (384,043) Few for servlcse 1,048,133 680,389 1306,744) A Interest revonus 1,26,000 030,700 211,706 Intergovernmental 489,414 603,724 14,310 Contributions MiscoMaosous 401,614 805,905 404,271 00010 Total Revenues _ 10,661,806 19,822,427 270,821 EXPENDITURES: Cumant- Ommol Government 9,600,378 5,901,068 005,200 Public safety 10,765,347 10,849,668 (94,3111 Public worm 4,082,972 4,606,607 1)%486 Perm Oral reersetien 2,276,487 2,240,668 34,828 Other CsPitel alley 182204 164,076 34269 Debt service • Principal teoiretnern Interest and fiscal chrgm Total Espeedkwee 27,412,408 20,052,867 760,651 EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDERI EXPENDITURES (71860,6021 10,830,4301 1,030,172 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Proceeds of lwv.iwm debt Operating transfers in 7,285,002 6,039,544 1340,068) Operating tram I" out 1240,074) 1240,9741 _ Total Other FktwvAnp Sswoae SU"o) _ 7,285,802 6,688,670 (587,032) EXCESS OF REVENUES AND OTHER SOURCES OVER (UNDERI EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES 1676,0001 (131,860) 443,140 FUND BALANCE • October 1 3,138,744 4,760,046 1,011,301 FUND BALANCE • Ssptanbar 30 4 2,603,744 4 4,818,186 12,064;141 r The ecoompanyiV Was to linenelel stet mente .•.a on Integral pert of this elalemeni, •10- CompfehensIve Annual Flnenclel Report - C 'r r. 41 -SITY OF DENTON, TEXAS N~ •Y 6p.d.l Rov6nue Roam lon Fund D*bt 96rvico Fund Vvlwcs Vr16606 6 Fravonble FnvcwsWo Budoot Aotc ~J (unfwonbltl B04rt AcwW Iunfaofs"41 4 4 44,286,800 14,404,288 4117,408 602,670 447,680 1236,0901 ' 20,220 20,229 2,626 2,626 682,670 467,808 1214,8611 4,286,000 4,406,823 120,023 618,000 396,468 222,643 ' 2,6001000 2,71086 1114,8681 • 2.146.900 21106,106 41,006 6181000 396,408 222,643 4,740,800 4.819,773 172.9731 64,001 72,343 7,882 1460,0001 1412,9601 47.060 04,801 72,343 7,082 (460,000} 1412.9601 47,060 6,204 112,6011 (21,706) 662,110 722,476 160,386 173,866 469,842: 1114,0231 1102.110 4309,626 ? 1207,410• - s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report a: a Ia I. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS M r: COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS - ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30 1991 Proprietary Fund Types Enterprise Internal Service OPERATING REVENUES: $63,716,444 $ Electric service 10,899,660 ' Water service 6,824,893 Sewer service 3,838,916 6,468,815 Charges for services 228,470 368,786 Sundry 84,107,273 5,637,600 0 Total Operating Revenues OPERATING EXPENSES: 841,467,676 6 Purchased power Fuel 2,066,286 88,126 ' Purchase of water 9,881,204 622,778 Salaries and wages Materials and supplies 1,190,018 3,110,941 2,945,567 62,463 Maintenance and repairs 6,454,507 1,317,30 Depreciation 2,140,344 279,933 Miscellaneous Total Operating Expeneee 66,223,696 6,383,480 Operating Income (loss) 17,883,677 464,120 NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES): 4,103,243 366,976 Interest revenue (8,627,7691 1170,654) Interest expense and fiscal charges 1214,226) 73,675 Other (2,738,761) 260,097 Total Nonoperating Revenues IExpensesl Income Before Operating Transfers 15,144,826 714,217 + OPERATING TRANSFERS (IN) 85,216 OPERATING TRANSFERS IOUTI (6,819,899) 174,860) 8,410,142 639,357 66,263,395 724,063 Net Income RETAINED EARNINGS • October t $64,673,637 61,363,410 RETAINED EARNINGS • September 30 The accompanying notes to financial statements are an Integral part of this statement. • 12, Comprehensive Annual Financial Report s r. '3v~y t CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Totals (Memo(andum Only) Year Ended September 30, 1991 September 30, 1990 863,716,444 662,680,319 10,699,650 9,734,904 6,624,893 5,263,661 9,307,731 8,732,674 597,256 190,143 89,944,873 86,601,701 .:01 641,467,675 642,345,467 2,066,266 1,402,344 88,125 10,603,982 9,910,136 4,300,969 3,993,609 2,998,020 3,102,878 7,771,872 7,912,069 2,420,277 2,344,919 71,607,176 71,011,422 18,337,697 16,590,279 4,460,219 3,893,081 (6,798,323) (6,453,209) a (140,660) (304,714) 12,478,654) 11,664,842) 16,869,043 13,725,437 86,215 (6,894,7691 (6,703,172) 9,049,499 7,022,266 56,987,448 49,965,183 686,036,947 856,987,448 . 13. Oomprehonalve Annual Flnanclal Report - r p l/ If ~I ly CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS _ COMBINED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS - ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Proprietary Fund Types Enterprise Internal Service Cash Bows from operating actlvkiea: Cash received from customers 6 89,310,534 0 6,462,136 Cash paid to employees for services (9,821,838) (822,806) Cash paid to suppliers (50,643,096) (3,366,660) Net cash provkled by {used fat operations Z8~846,600 11,403+671 eJ Cash flows from nonospitel financing activities: Oporating transfem (8,734,684) (74,880) Net cash provided by (used for) noncapkal financing activkies (8,734,684) 174,8601 Cash flows from capital and related financing aotivk)ss: Contributed capital 428,981 147,890 Proceeds from the sale of contractual obligation 380,000 Proceeds from Notes Payable 2,007,000 Interest paid (8,841, 9841 1170, 6641 Principal paid on contractual obligation (3,627,160) (800,3321 Acquisition of fixed assets (11,896,869) (1,200,666) Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets 73,676 Net change In restricted assets 6,477,488 Net change In deferred bond issuance cost 61,641 Advance from Electric Net cash provided by (used for) capital related activities ° 113,201,9021 (11580,005) Cash lbws form Investing actlvk(es: Advance to Sanitation Proceeds from sale of Investment securities 66,707,680 8,821,011 Interest received on Investments 4,103,243 366,978 Purchase of Investment securities (88,763,420) (8,633,766) Principal paid on notes payable (23,18D) Net cash provided by (used fot) Investing activities (8,866,7771 644,222 Net Increase (decrease) In cash and cash equivalents (68,783) $82,928 Cash and cash equivalents October 1 66,763 72,084 Cash and cash equivalents September 30 6 9 464,892 The accompanying notes to financial statements are an Integral pert of this statement. . 14- Comprehensive Annual Financial Report ti 1 T t/ ~a DSl".:i•l~ gc ff l: i~t 1 .:lYr CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Totals (Memorandum Only) Year Ended September 30, 1991 September 30, 1990 6 94,772,870 8 91,872,123 (10,444,744) (9,825,463) 163,998,766) (52,248,027) 30,32Q,172 1097;833 e 1818091644) (8,703,1721 (818091644) 16,703,172) too 677,861 340,863 , 390,000 21,960,000 2,007,000 1,980,127 (7,012,648) 15,713,780) (4,427,482) (3,627,850) 1t2,899,613) 18,216,411) 73,676 8,477,468 (18,606,673) 61,841 (39,996) 600,000 (14,781,808) (12,931,608) (600,000) 64,628,591 16,190,727 4,480,219 3,893,W (77,387,185) (23,748,543) (23,180) (1,430,812) 18,421,666) (6,606,647) 338,186 (6,332,696) 128,827 4,868,604 4 464,992 4 (878,0911` -16• Comprehensive Annual Financial Report C C• CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS - ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES (Continued) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 f Enterprise Internal Service Reconciliation of Proprietary Operating Fund Income to Net Cash Provided by (used for} Operating Activities Operating income (loss) 617,883,677 $ 464,120 Adjustments: r Depreciation expense 6,464,507 1,317,365 Decrease tlncrease) In receivables 516,975 (47,988) Decrease (Increase) In due from other funds 4,666,286 (327,477) Decrease (Increase) in inventories 224,039 (124,272) Increase (Decrease) In accounts payable 3,100,200 11568,680 Increase (Decrease) in leases payable (24,028) 113,389) Increase (DecresselIn accumulated unpaid compensated absences 59,365 (1281 Increase (Decrease) In due to other funds 14,066,321) 11,333,5421 Total adjustments 10,962,023 1,029,451 Net cash provided by (used for) operating sctivitlea $28,846,600 4 1,483,671 n -16- c - Comprehensive Annual Financial Report C, l x i o "u CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS B Totals Year Ended September 30, 1991 September 30, 1990 418,337,697 416,690,279 7,771,872 7,912,069 468,967 (286,844) 4,356,809 14,442,734) 99,767 11,224,022) 4,669,080 487,861 (37,417) 74,799 69,239 84,673 (6,388,863) 1,601,762 11,991,474 4,207,364 X430,329,172 419,797,633 -17' Comprehensive Annual Flnenclel Report - - + r I :i i CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS a E 18• C Comprahandva Annuat Financial Report C ti. s 'wy ~ j Y )t CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 (1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The City of Denton ("the City") was Incorporated September 28, 1866, The City operates as a Home Ruie City, under a Councll•Manager form of government and provides the following services as authorized by Its Charter: public safety (police and fire), public works, parks and recreation, electric, water and sewer utilities, sanitation, and general administrative services, The financial statements of the City Include all activities for which the City exercises oversight responsibility. The criteria considered in determining governmental activities to be reported within the City's general purpose financial statements Include the degree of oversight responsibility exercised by the City Council ever the aotlvlty or function; the City's accountability for the entity's fiscal matters; the scope of public service of the entity and the nature of any special financing relationships which may exist between the City and a given governmental entity. The accounting policies of the City conform to generally accepted accounting principles As applicable to governments, The following is a summary of the more significant policles: A, Fund Accounting The accounts of the City are maintained on the basis of funds or account groups, each of which Is considered a separate accounting entity, The operations of each fund are summarized by providing a separate set of self-baiancing accounts which comprise Its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues, expenses and expenditures, The following funds and account groups are used by the City: Governmental Fund Types General Fund. The General Fund Is the principal fund of the City. All general tax revenues and other recelpts that are not allocated by law or contractual agreement to some other fund are accounted for In this fund, From the fund are paid the general operating costs, the fixed charges and the capital Improvement costs that are not paid through other funds, Spacial Revenue Funds- The Special Revenue Funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sourres (other than special assessments, expendable trusts, or major capital projects) that are legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes, These funds Include the grants from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (Community Development Block Grant) and from the Texas Criminal Justice Division, Department of Education, the recreation fund and miscellaneous other revenues. 19 i C. y h Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 Debt Service Fund- The Debt Service Fund accounts for the payment of princlpal and Interest on general long-term liabilities, paid primarlly by taxes levied by the City, and for the payment of principal and Interest on capital leases In the governmental fund types. Capital Projects Funds- The Capital Projects Funds account for the acquisition of capital facilities being financed from » bond proceeds, contributed capital, or transfers from other funds, other then those recorded in the Enterprise Funds, the Internal Service Funds and the Trust Funds, Proprietary Fund Types rr Enterprise Funds- The Enterprise Funds are used to account for operations that are financed and operated In a manner similar to private business enterprises where the Intent of the governing body Is that the costs (expenses, Including depreciation) of providing goods or services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. These funds Include the Electric, Water and Sewer Utility Systems (Utility System) and the Sanltatlon operatlons, Internal Service Funds. The internal Service Funds account for the financing of materials and services provided by one department of the City to other departments of the City on a cost-reimbursament basis, These funds Include the Working Capital Fund (vehirle maintenance, warehouse end machine shop) and the Motor fool operation, Fiduciary Fund Types Trust and Agency Funds. Trust and Agency Funds are used to account for assets held by the City In a trustee capacity or as an agent for Individuals, private organizations, other governments, and/or vthur funds, These Inciude Expendable Trust Fund (Employee Insurance) and Agency Funds, The Expendable Trust Fund Is accounted for In essentlai)y the same manner as Governmental Fund Types. Agency Funds are custodial In nature (assets equal liabilities) and do not Involve measurement of results of operations, General Fixed Assets Account Group The General Fixed Assets Account Group represents a summary of the fixed assets of the City, other then assets of the Proprietary Funds. Capital outlays In funds other than Proprietary Fund Type are recorded as expenditures of those funds at the time of purchase and subsequently recorded for control purposes In the General Fixed Assets Account Group. General Long-Term Liabilities Account Group The General Long-Term LlabVItias Account Group represents a summary of the long-term liabilities of the City paid principally by taxes levied by the Clty. This account group does not Include long-term debt accounted for In the Proprietary Fund Types, 20- c t f ye y.. r Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 B. Basis of Accounting The accrual basls•-Tho Proprietary Fund Types are accounted for on a flow of economic resources measurement focus. Accordingly, the accrual basis, whereby revenues and expenses are Identified In the accounting period In which they ere earned and Incurred and net Income Is determined, Is utilized for these funds, Modified accrual bads--The Governmental Fund Types, Expendable Trust and Agency Funds accounted are for on a t of financial measurement accrual baslsIs used for these funds. Modifications In the accrual basis for these funds Include the following; 1. Revenues are recognized when they become both measurable and available for use during the " year, Those revenues treated as being susceptible to accrual Include taxes, Interest and intergovernmental revenues, Revenue sources from licenses, fines and forfeitures, service charges and other miscellaneous revenues are recognized as the cash Is received, 2. Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability Is Incurred, except for Interest and principal on general long-term debt, which are recorded when due, and vacation and sick leave, which are recorded when payable from current available resources. 3 fo cumbrance expenditu euofimonies are recorded rInaorder torreserve r that portion other of the applicable appropriation, is employed as an extension of formal budgetary Integration. Encumbrances outstanding at year-end are reported as reservations of fund balances since they do not constitute expenditures or liabilities, C, Budgets and Budgetary Accounting The City Council follows these procedures as prescribed by City Charter, In establishing the budgets reflected In the financial statements; 1, At least tslxty days prior to the beginning of each fiscal year, the City Manager submits to the City Council a proposed budget for the fiscal year beginning on the following October 1, The operating budget Includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing them, 2, Public hearings are conducted prior to the adoption of the budget In order to obtain taxpayer comments, 3. The annual budget adopted by the City Council covers the General Fund, the Special Revenue Fund (Recreation Fund only), the Debt Service Fund, the Enterprise Funds, and the Internal Service Fund (Working Capital Fund only), The budget Is legally enacted by the City Council through passage of an ordlnence prior to the beginning of the fiscal year, The general purpose financial statements reflect appropriation control by function activity within an Individual fund as approved by City Council, 4, 't'he City Charter provides that the City Manager has the authority to transfer any unenuumbered appropriation balances from one expenditure account to another within a single office, department or agency, The Charter also provides that within the last three months of the year the City Manager must request the City Council to approve any transfer of unencumbered appropriation balances or portions thereof from one function to anuther as well 21 C , i Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 e. Basis of Accounting The accrual basls-.The Proprietary Fund Types are accounted for on a flow of economic resources measurement focus, Accordingly, the accrual basis, whereby revenues and expenses are Identified In the accounting period In which they are earned and Incurred and net Income is determined, Is utilized for these funds. Podlfled accrual balls--The Governmental Fund Types, Expendable Trust and Agency Funds are accounted for on a flow of financial resources measurement focus, Accordingly, the modified accrual basis is used for thasa funds, Modifications In the accrual basis for these funds include the following; 1. Revenues are recognized when they become both measurable and available for use during the year, Those revenues treated as being susceptible to accrual Include taxes, Interest and Intergovernmental revenues. Revenue sources from licenses, fines and forfeitures, service charges and other miscellaneous revenues are recognized as the cash Is received. , 2. Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability Is Incurred, except for interest and principal on general long-term debt, which are recorded when due, and vacation and sick leave, which are recorded whon payable from current available resources, 3 Encumbrance In a order to rraerve contracts, that portion other for the of the pplicsble expenditue accounting, of l monies are recorded purchase appropriation, is employed as an extension of formal budgetary integration. Encumbrances outstanding at year-end are reported as reservations of fund balances since they do not constitute expenditures or liabilities, C, Budgets and Budgetary Accounting The City Council follows these procedures as prescribed by City Charter, in establishing the budnets reflected In the financial statements; 1. At least sixty days prior to the beginning of each fiscal year, the City Manager submits to the City Council a proposed budget for the fiscal year beginning on the following October 1, The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing them, 2, Public hearings are conducted prior to the adoption of the budget In order to obtain taxpayer { comments, 3. The annual Fund (Recreation eFundponly),yththe City e Debt Service e covers Fund, the Enterprise Funds, and the Internal Service Fund (Working Capital Fund only). The budget Is legally enacted by the City Council through passage of an ordinance prior to the beginning of the fiscal year. The general purpose financial statements reflect appropriation control by function activity within an Individual fund as approved by City Council, 4, The City Charter provides that the City Manager has the authority to transfer any unencumbered appropriation balances from one expenditure account to another within a single office, department or agency. The Charter also provides that within the last three t oaths of the year the City Manager must request the City Council to approve any unencumbered appropriation balances or portions thereof from one function to another as well 21 ,4, sl Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 as any Increases in fund appropriations, Individual amendments were not material In relation to the original appropriations which were amended. All budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles except that for the Governmental Fund Types and Proprietary Fund Types encumbrances are treated as budgeted expenditures In the year of commitment to purchase and for the Proprietary Fund Types depreciation expense Is not budgeted, Ali unexpended appropriations at fiscal year end lapse to the appropriate fund balance except for those of the multi-year grants and/or projects, A reconciliation of revenues and expenditures on the budgetary basis to revenues and expenditures on the modified accrual basis for Governmental Fund Types Is as follows, + Special Revenue Funds Otneral Fond Revenuest Budgetary basis $29,761,871 ( 407,809 Speolal Ravanua Funds Unbudgetedt Community Development Broak Grant 606,420 Recreation 6,908 Crlminol Justloe 115,891 Bmily Fowler Wary 57,963 Other 575,211 Long-Term Losses 168,910 51009 Revenues on modifled accrual beefs 25,917,597 1,703,199 Fxponditureu Budgetary ba3le 20,583,831 386,488 Encumbranose Ineq 100,661 Special Revenue Funds Unbudgetedi Community Development Mock Grant 504,030 Reareetion 91321 Ctlminal Justloe 126,891 Emlly Fowler 61,382 Other 6211186 Expenditures on modifled accrual basis 29,894,382 1,607,286 Revenues (underl expanditursa on modified accrual bsole 1 17e,49$) il 166,934 22 \ r. p i Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 D. Cash and Investmenot For the purposes of the "Statements of Cash F)ow," the City considers demand deposits and certificates of deposits with maturities of under 90 days to be cash and cash equivalents, Investments are carried at cost which approximates market value except for Investments in the deferred compensation plan which are carried at market value, Interest earned on Investments Is recorded In the funds In which the Investments are recorded. E, Unbilled Receivables , The City accrues amounts for utility services provided In September, but not billed at September 30, 1991. F, Inventories Inventories are valued at cost or the lower of cuss or market. Cost is determined using a moving average method. L.. Vxed Assets fntemrlse and Intents/ Servlae Funds. xed assets Contrib tied p operty Isarecrecorded at o recorded at fair omarket luvalue attthet date of ucontribution, Depieciatlon period, recorded on each class of depreclable property utilizing the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, A 23 . r? i t t 1 ti ~i Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 Estimated useful lives are as follows; Useful Life Flied Asset lYeare) ENTERPRISE FUNDS. Eltctde System General assets • Structures 60 • Equipment 6 20 + Distribution assets • Structures 60 . Equipment 20 33 1 Transmission assets . Equipment 20 33 Internal combustion assets • Structures 60 • Equipment 13 20 Steam power assets . Structures 60 . Equipment 20 36 Water end $*wee System Structures 60 Water and sewer mains 20 33 Equipment 10 20 Furniture and fixtures 10 Water Storage Rlghta 40 100 SOMOOOM Vehicles and equipment 10 Landfill 8 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS. a Vehicles and equipment } 10 Renewals and betterments of property and equipment are capitalized, whereas normal repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred, General Fisted Assets- f General fixed assets are recorded as expenditures In the General, Special Revenue or Gapltal Projects Funds when acquired, Such assets are capitalized at cost in the General Fixed Assets Account Group, Significant gifts or contributions of assets are recorded In the General Fixed Assets Account Group at the fair market value at the date of acquisition. Public domain (Infrastructure) general fixed assets consisting of streets, curbs, sidewalks, gutters and drainage systems, are capitalized along with other general f)xed assets No depreciation Is provided on general fixed assets, 24- pr- Notes, city of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 H, Property Tax Revenue Property taxes attach as an enforceable Ilan on property as of January 1. Taxes are levied on October 1 and are due and payable at that time, All unpaid taxes levied October 1 become delinquent February 1 of the following year, The City records revenue from current property taxes In the year In which bills are measurable and available. An allowance Is provided for delinquent taxes not expected to be collected In the future, At September 30, 1991, the City had a tax margin of 91,84 per 0100 valuation based upon a maximum ad valorem tax of 92.50 per 9100 valuation Imposed by TAxas Constitutional law, Additional revenues up to 937,473,500 could be raised per year based on the current year's assessed value of 92,038,803,285 before the limit Is reached, I. Compensated Absences The City allows employees to accumulate unused vacation up to forty days. Upon termination, any accumulated vacation time will be paid to the employees, Generally, sick leave Is not paid upon termination Alire and ll other employees are paid only upon Illness w accumulate hile in the em l ploy of the City, mum of 90 days for Ac of September 30, 1991, the liebillty for accrued vacation leave and accrued sick leave is approximately 93,049,580. Thr amounts applicable to the Enterprise Funds 19504,938) and Internal Service Funds (921,343) have been recorded In those funds, and the amount applicable to other funds signifianttOroup. The amount financial resources Is Llablilties (42,523,299) has been current available General expected to be paid from J, "Memorandum Only" Total Columns Total columns on the combined statements are captioned as "memorandum only" to indicate that they are presented only to facilitate analysis. Data In these columns do not present financial position, ons unting principles. eThisnpresntationsdoesnnotirepresetntt e l consolidation, I terfund generally have not been made In the aggregation of this data, (2) CASH AND INVESYMENTS In order to facilitate effective cash management practices, the operating cash and certificates of deposits of all funds, except for the deferred compensation fund are pooled Into common accounts for the purpose of Increasing income through combined Investment activities The City's bank deposits (cash and certificates of deposit) at year-end were entirely covered by federal depository insurance or by collateral held by the City's agent In the City's name, The investments of the deterred compensation fund are hold separately from those of other City funds by an outside trustee appointed by the City, Statutes authorize the City to Invest In obiigatlons of tho U,S Treasury, U.S, agenciss, repurchase agreements, municipal pools, and certificates of deposit, ?J i F` '.I C, Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 At September 30, 1991, the City's Investments are Insured or registered or the securities are held by the City or its agent in the City's name, As of September 30, 1991, the City's Investments are as follows; Par Cost Market Value U,S, Treasury Securltles $46,750,000 $46,549,953 $47,478,527 U,S, Agency Securities 22,000,000 22,220,801 22,624,220 Municipal Pools 81193,000 8,193,000 8,193,000 M $76,943,000 876,963,764 > $78,192,747 (3) FIXED ASSETS Genera/ Fixed Assets- General fixed assets balances and transactions for the year ended September 30, 1991, are summarized below; Balance Balance October 1, Transfers/ September 30, 1990 Additions Deductions 1991 Land $ 4,726,786 $ $ $ 4,728,788 Buildings 8,438,732 2,643,071 10,981,803 Streets 47,345,044 2,248,818 49,593,882 Machinery and equipment and other improvements 7,176,732 268,410 7,444,142 Constructlon In progress 8,438,913 31061,889 14,791,889) 8,706,693 Total $78,123,207 $8,121,968 6(4,791,8891 8791453,286 A investment in General Fixed Assets From bond issues $64,854,613 $7,863,668 414,791,889) $57,916,182 From current revenue 71946,078 268,410 • 8,213,488 62,799,591 8,121,968 (4,791,889) 86,129,670 From cont(lbutlons 13,323,616 • 13,323,616 Total 276,1123,207 $8,121,988 - 614,791,889) $79,453,286= 26 5 • jl • a 'k Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 follows) General Fixed Assets by function and activity as of September 30, 1991 are summarized as Total Mach./Equlp, and LAM TOM PN1on TO 007GaEq 1, l Buildings Other .straata Improvements ase 663,241,604 $4,894,462 1 890 8,,132 OFN `I.k,4I QO~ERNMEN7'; 0 34, 702, 284 16, 664, 838 Parks Parka a 2,462,887 11,718 2,302,162 e rant Legal 69,834 42,028 139,098 71,e9a 17,808 Munlolpel Court 7,367 71888 Personnel 7,367 8,889 CMO/MBED 19,326 8,888 Buffdfng Malntanance 18,329 7,896 Library 2,160 MsnninglCb 66o'6? 6 21868 6,746 • OPeratlone Argp,.yla 163,266 73,201 2,034 677,867 4,024 71,084 ''1 11 11 1 11 - 11 Total Ganarel Government 4,124 3,387,783 128,948 2,308,884 PUN'to WORKS; 931,143 TraHfo Englnearing 36,878 Errtargenoy Management 16,798 36,978 Englnpring , 26,782 16,799 Coda EnforoamenE 4,871 26,782 ' Public Works Adminlatralfon 4,871 20,733 Streets 14,961,763 4 336 20,733 street 8weepMg/prainage 11,660 14,881,678 Airport Bond 30,821 74,280 3,788 30,821 Airport 2,813 3,798 E""MOntal Health game$$ 476 2,613 • Animal Control 268,403 476 • Total Public Works 268,802 116,381,813 / 4336 3,601 4 277,392 114,691,678 it 218,608 z7. C M 4 G , Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 Mooh.l6qulp. and Other Total Lend Bulldinpe Streets Improvements loontlnuedl MANCEr Finance Administrstlon / 38,826 4 / 1 1 38,826 Customer 9 ervl re 30,134 38,134 Purohasing 3,688 3,BBtl Csahlering 13,694 13,684 • Accounting 18,884 19,864 Court Clerks 21,973 21,973 Tax 2,006 2,006 a~ Word Processing 26,734 1,122 26,812 Information SeMoeo 134,996 2,903 132,09 Dofenslve Driving 1,083 1,083 Tout Finance 288,066 4,026 292,831 PdifUC SAFETY; Fire Adminlstratlon 14,314 14,314 Fire 0p a ra lions 166,101 1,260 163,841 Fite Preventlon 6,829 1,063 4,770 Brnergency Medical 10,473 19,473 Flit !2611 7,698 7,698 Poltos Adminlntetlon 19,710 19,710 Criminal Investigation 42,318 42,318 Police Operations 63,783 83,783 Police Support operations 08,032 881832 Police Orants 23,881 23,881 A Total Publlo Safety 448,637 1,063 1,280 440,324 Construotlon In Ptogtan 017081093 TOTAL 979,463,286 44,720,788 110,991,803 449,693,862 17,444,142 28 t v C ~t v. r rp5rr t IY'i f{ Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 Changes In general flxed assets by function and activity for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1991 are summarized as follows; 1 General General Fixed Acaete Transfers! Fixed Aeeets 1011!80 Additions Deductlone 9130191 TOTAL PRIOR TO OCTOBER 1, 1989 $63,241,504 $ 1 $63,241,804 GENERAL GOVERNMENT; Parke 161,188 2,291,798 1,452,967 Parke Grant 69,044 68,83! e Legal 60,092 11,806 71,989 Municipal Court 7,367 7,367 Paracnnel 9,888 $,see CMOIMSED 19,326 19,326 Building Maintenance 7,896 7,896 Library 465,365 125,160 660,616 Planning/CD 144,071 9,228 163,298 Opmationa Anelysle 4,824 4,824 Total General Government 928,831 2,437,952 3,367,783 "LIC WORKS; Traffic Engineering 34,249 1,730 36,878 Emergency Management 14,1$0 1,648 161798 Engineering 26,259 603 26,762 Code Enforcement 4,871 4,871 Public Works Administration 20,733 20,733 streets 12,732,945 2,248,819 14,891,763 3treet Sweeping/Drainage 29,091 2,630 30,621 Airport Bond 3,798 3,788 Airport 21813 21613 Envitonrnudal Health Servioee 476 476 Animal Control 31801 266,802 288,403 Total PubHo Works 412,870,782 42,621,031 4 $16,391,813 -29• C t J, YY ~f 0 .;Aft r g Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 i General General Trendenl Fixed Aseets Fixed Asset 10!1!90 Addpions Deductions 9130181 (oonlinued) FINANCE; 21,696 8 16,229 1 1 38,826 Finsnoe AdminttrstVon 26,684 10,660 36,134 Customer SeMoe 3,688 Purohulno 3,889 707 12,887 13,694 4 Csehlsrlnp 18,998 888 18,184 A coom ding 21,973 Court Clerks 20,642 1,431 286 1,780 2,086 Tot 28,734 Word Prooe+sinp 29,734 Inlormetlon 9ervl006 108,043 28,862 134,996 1,083 Dslenslve Driving 1,083 226,169 71,887 296,868 7etd Finena PUBLIC BAFEM 12,122 2,192 14,314 Fire AdmlMettNion 186,101 96,101 Fire Operetlons 105,101 8,829 Firs Prevention 6829 19,473 18,473 Emupenoy Mediosi Fire (261) 7,696 7,698 19,710 18,710 Poiloe Administration 42,318 31,728 10,680 C rimin el In•ratl petlo n 67,678 8,206 83,793 Polloe Operetlons 86,028 604 99,832 Polio* Support Opentiom 13,863 10,029 23,891 Polloe Orent 419,018 29,819 448,837 Total PublEo safety Construotion in Prooress 8,438,913 31091,869 (4,781,889) 6,708,893 TOTAL 878,123,207 08,121;889 4(4;791,889) $70,453,206 • 30- i a~ i Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 Construction In progress is composed of the following; Project Expended to Aoproorla>Ion September 30 1991 Alrport Improvements 8 333,000 8 310,821 4 22,179 Northeast Recreation Center 1,300,000 4,000 1,296,000 Athletic Fields 600,000 272,190 327,810 Library 425,000 67,467 357,543 Mrs Statlon N5 666,600 666,500 a Law Enforcement 200,000 60,451 149,649 GIS Computer System 111501000 503,310 646,690 Fire Station N6 611,700 59,758 651,942 City Hall/Fire Station Roof 200,000 176,215 23,785 Street and Bridge - Carroll Turn 20,000 16,557 3,443 Highway 380/01d North Projocts 29,164 24,665 4,489 Miller Parkway 417,942 363,736 $4,207 Miller Turn 96,061 95,460 611 Teasley Projects 616,517 660,779 65,738 Fry 138,014 116,388 22,626 Hickory 867,702 806,504 51,198 Locust 11155,313 657,466 697,847 Elm 314,516 31,705 282,811 Scripture 370,034 370,034 Bell Avenue 643,656 643,556 Mingo Road 131,871 117,019 14,852 Willow Spring 516,970 516,970 Traffic System/Square 434,000 190,751 243,249 Sidewalks 180,157 126,805 53,662 James Street 2,646 2,646 Longrldge Street 61800 50800 Stuart/Sunny 2,262 2,252 Loma Dal Rey 986,792 56,643 930,149 Nottingham 306,446 7,181 299,266 Anima( Control-Paving 5,062 61052 Bell/McKlnney Intersection 74,106 74,106 Pedestrian Islands 35,259 533 34,726 Fort Worth Drive 4.694 4,1594 Total 41273 .954 66,708.693 $84 24,281 •31- C R s h 1 S+ E 9 Motes, Clty of Denton (Contlnued) September 30, 1991 f Enterprise and Internal Service Funds- Fixed assets of these funds are as follows; September 30 0 1991 1990 Utility System- Land anddand rights S 1,799,537 S 11799,637 Water storage rights 67,347,084 66,340,064 Electric plant and equipment 76,142,672 71,1001 17l) Water plant and equipment 39,869,828 38,581,603 Sewer plant and equipment 37,766,454 38,492,384 212,926,656 206,313,668 Less • Allowance for depreciation (72,534,213) (66,375,193) 140,391,342 138,938,486 Construction In progress 7,000,863 2,996,803 Total fixed assets - Utility System $147,392,205 8141,935,799 Sanitation. Land and land rights $ 11992,239 $ 1,994,772 Vehicles and equipment 419,169 401,699 Less • Allowance for depreclatlon (1,270,439) (1,032,816) Total fixed assets - Sanitation $ 1,140,989 S 11353,666 ■Tli _ Internal Service- Vehicles and other assets $ 13,230,058 $ 12,617,635 Leos - Allowance for depreclatlon (10,425,774) (9,718,195) 0 2,804,284 $ 2,899,440 Construction In Progress 21,555 Total fixed assets • Internal service $ 2,804,284 $ 2,920,995 32- s, I .j Notes, Clty of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 (4) LONG-TERM LIABILITIES follows; Long-term Ilabllities transactions for the year ended September 30, 1991, are summarized as Balance at Balance at October 1, September 30, 1990 Issued Retlred 1991 Genora/ 1Ong. Term LWArtles General Obllgation bonds 8 26,868,509 S 82,157,180 8 23,511,369 Certificates of Obligation 2,835,000 200,000 4340888 2,800,332 • Obligations under capital leases 60,783 164,926 13,640 212,148 Accumulated unpaid compensated absences 2,393,124 130,175 2,523,299 TOW9000ra/long-termW11111es 30,967,396 496,100 2,605,368 28,847,138 Proprietary Fund Types Utility System revenue bonds 68,610,000 2,900,000 65,710,000 General Obligation bonds (pledged by sanltatlon revenues) 1,178,221 122,80 1,055,371 ContractualObllgatl,on 1,620,000 870,000 850,000 Certificates of Obllgetion 910,000 390,000 130,332 1,169,888 Obligations under capital leases 35,218 13,389 21,829 Accumulated unpaid compensated absences 467,042 69,239 626,281 Note payable 63,869,188 2,007,000 23,180 68,643,008 Tofa/prOPrlstaryfund typos 116,379,669 2,486,239 3,859,761 114,9780167 Total long-term lisbllltlea 4147,337,066 42,981,339 48,485,109 0143,823,296 33- A ~r i~ i +i , Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 C General Bonded Debt- General bonded debt at September 30, 1991, is comprised of the following: Amount Outstanding at Interast Rate Final Original Amount September 30, Bonded Debt M Issue Date Maturity of Issue 1991 General Obligation Refunding 6.70 to 8.30 1986 2004 423,726,730 $16,076,730 General Obligation 6.40 to 9.40 1987 2007 31600,000 2,800,000 General Obligation 6.60 to 9.60 1988 2008 31800,000 3,260,000 General Obligation 6.60 to 9,60 1989 2009 3,616,000 3,440,000 Total General Obllgation Bonds 34,441,730 24,666,730 Certificates of Obligation 6,00 to 9.00 1987 2007 600,000 400,000 Certlflcates of Obligation 6,00 to 8.76 1987 1997 11100,000 740,000 Certificates of Obligation 6.60 to 9,60 1989 1999 111661000 640,000 Certificates of Obligation 6,00 to 9.00 1989 1999 11660,000 1,400,000 Certlflcates of Obligation 6.30 to 6,70 1990 1993 1,260,000 860,000 Certlflcates of Obligation 6.40 to 8.40 1991 2006 690,000 690,000 Total Other General Bonded Debt 6,146,000 4,620,000 Total General Bonded Debt $40,688,730 429,186,730 Proceeds of general bonded debt are restricted to the uses for which they were approved In the bond elections, The City Charter expressly prohibits the use of bond proceeds to fund operating expenses, The general obligations are collaterallzed by the full faith and credit of the City and, ' primarily, payable from proporty, taxes. In 1986, the Clty defeased all general obligation bonds by placing the proceeds of new bonds in an Irrevocable trust to provide for all future debt service payments on the old bonds. Accordingly, the trust account assets and liabilities for the defeased bonds are not Included In the City's tlnencial statements. On September 30, 1991, 416,266,000 of bonds conaidered defeased are still outstanding. 34 ri t ~i Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 Revenue Bonds- r Revenue bond debt at September 30, 1991, is comprised of the following Issues: Amount Outstanding at Interest Rate Final Original Amount September 30, Revenue Bonds 1961 Issue Date Maturity of Issue 1991 Utility System 4,75 to 9,025 1983 2007 $25,280,000 411,275,000 Utility System 9,00 to 12,00 1984 2009 20,000,000 31600,000 Utility System 8.00 to 11,00 1984 2004 11000,000 200,000 Utility System Refunding 5,00 to 7,00 1987 2009 17,485,000 17,485,000 Utility System 6.75 to 9,76 1988 2007 31600,000 3,150,000 Utility System 6,00 to 9.00 1989 2009 20,000,000 20,000,000 $87,285,000 $55,710,000 The City has the option to retire at per all or a portion of the bonds, except for the Utility System Revenue Bonds Issued October 26, 1984, prior to maturity on or after December 1, 1993, The bonds Iscued October 25, 1984, give the City the some option on or after December 1, 1994, The revenue bonds are collateralized by the revenue of the Utility System and the various special funds established by the bond ordinance, The ordinance provides that the revenue of the System is to be used first to pay operating and maintenance expenses of the System and second to establish and maintain the revenue bond funds, Any remaining revenues may then be used for any lawful purpose. The ordinance also contains provisions which, among other Items, restrict the Issuance of additional revenue bonds unless the special funds noted above contain the required amounts and certain financial ratios are met, The City Is In compliance with all significant requirements. Below is a summary of the various restricted asset accounts required by the bond ordinance as of September 30, 1991: Interest and Sinking Fund S 7,864,632 / Reserve Fund 4,812,000 Emergency Fund 260,000 Extension and Improvement Fund 2,827,746 115,55 77 Assets In these accounts consists of cash and U.S, government securities. Related liablllties and retained earnings are as follows: Payable from restricted assets- Accrued Interest 4 1,470,602 Revenue bonds payable, current 21505,000 Retained earnings reserved for bond retirement --1-0,b7fM 81,E 6,554,377 35 i R Notes, City of Denton {Contlnued) September 30, 1991 In prior years, the City defeased revenue bonds by placing the proceeds of new bonds in an Irrevocable trust to provide for all future debt service payments on the old bonds. Accordingly, the trust account assets and liabilities for the defeased bonds are not included In the City's financial statements, On September 30, 1991, 933,385,000 of bonds considered dofeased are still outstanding. In addition, the City has established a reserve fund to pay for General Obligation bonds pledged by Sanitation revenues of 8119,076, Note Payable. In '1980 the City and the City of Dallas contracted with the Corp of Engineers for the construction and development of Ray Roberts Reservolr in Denton County. In contracts with the Corp ' of Engineers, the City will pay for twentyslx (26%) per cent of the estimated water storage rights of the reservoir. Water obtained from the Reservolr will be pro rata on the basis of each city's proportional share of total construction cost, The closing of the dam was completed In 1987 with water being available from the Reservoir In 1989, The City's estimated total cost of water storage rights at September 30, 1991, was 867,347,000, Of this amount the City's estimated cost for present demand Is 829,690,440, The amount allocated to the storage for present demand shall be paid In fifty (50) consecutive annual Installments, the first of which was due and payable within thirty (30) days after the City was notified by the contracting officer that the project was completed and operational for water supply purposes. Annual installments are due and payable In October, The project investment cost allocated for the remaining portion of the storage space provided In Ray Roberts Reservoir for future use is currently estimated at 827,406,660 on the basis of cost presented, and the basis of cost at September 30, 1991, No principal or Interest payment with respect to this storage for future water supply Is required to be made during the first ten (10) years following the date the project is operational for water supply purposes unless all or a portion of such storage Is used for purposes of withdrawal of water from or transfer of water Into Ray Roberts Reservoir during this period, When any portlon of the storage for future water supply is used, the amount of the project Investment cost allocated thereto, plus Interest applicable to such portion as provided, will be due and payable on the date of the first use of such portion, The sold amount due shall be paid within the life of the project and not to exceed fifty (60) consecutive annual payments, The City Is also responsible for twentyslx (26%) per cent of the cost of any major capital replacement facilities required, The City will also be required to pay the government twenty-six (26%) per cent of the annual experienced operation and malntenance costs for speciflc water supply faclllties at the Reservoir, C 36 c~ Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 Aggregate maturities of the long-term debt (principal and Interest) for the years subsequent to September 30, 1991, are as follows; Bonds General Fiscal Year Obligatlons Revenue Notes Payablo Capital Leases Total 1992 4 5,488,703 8 7,756,138 82,059,140 862,208 8 15,366,189 1993 5,007,433 7,469,087 2,069,140 62,208 14,587,868 1994 4,402,480 7,100,213 2,126,137 62,208 13,690,038 1995 3,961,030 6,747,819 2,125,137 61,146 12,896,132 1996.2000 17,448,317 28,328,632 12,627,344 33,903 68,338,098 48,714,948 2001.2006 6,767,295 19,623,708 20,133,946 20,133,845 38,397,168 2006.2010 2,082,363 14,200,868 2011.2016 20,133,946 20,133,946 ' 113,634,319 113,634,319 2018.2048 ' Total principal 45,127,621 91,416,365 194,832,052 281,673 331,666,701 and Interest Less applicable Interest {16,940,691) {36,706,366) (139,189,0441 (47,6861 (190,682,9861 Total principal 4-29,186,730 4 66,710,000 866,643,008 $233,977 r 4 1400773,716 Bands Authodiod and Hnlssued- General obligations bonds suthorized but unissued as of September 30, 1991, amounted to $10,922,000, When issued, the proceeds will be allocated to the applicable Capital Projects Funds, (6) LEASES Leases payable represent the remaining principal amounts payable under lease purchase agreements for the acqulsltlon of vehlcles, copier equipment, computer hardware and other equipment, These leases are recorded as capital leases, The vehicles, copier equipment and the landfill ment are recorded In the General Fixed Assets and General Long -1 erm Liabilitesr Proprietary Fund Types, and the comruter equip Account Groups. Remaining requirements, including interest, under these leases are as follows; •37• C 't h - - v s I~ s t' Notes, Clty of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 General Proprietary Long-Term Year Fu0 Types Llabllitles 1992 S 6,738 5 55,470 1903 6,738 55,470 1894 6,738 55,470 1995 6,738 54,408 a 1996 33,903 26,952 254,721 Less - Applicable Interest (5,123) (42,673) Net Present Value 921,829 9212,148 (6) PENSION PLANS Texan Municipal Retirement Plans Plan Descrlptlon- The city provides pension benefits for all of Its fulk•tlme employees (except firefighters) through a nontraditional, joint contributory, defined contribution plan In the state-wide Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS), one of over 570 administered by TMRS, tin agent muktlple•amployer public employee retirement system. It is the opinion of the TMRS management that the plane In TMRS are substantially defined contribution plans, but they have elected to provide additional voluntary disclosure to help foster a better understanding of some of the nontraditional characteristics of the plan. Benefits depend upon the sum of the employee's contributions to the plan, with Interest, and the city-financed monetary credits, with interest, At the date the plan began, the city grante monetary credits for service rendered before the plan began of a theoretical amount equal to two times what would have been contributed by the employee, with Interest, prior to establishment of the ty can grant as oftennas2an0nu~allyfanotheremployee's of addition, the plan plan, accumulated contributions. service since the monetary credit referred to as an updated service credit which is a theoretical amount which, when added to the employee's accumulated contributions and the monetary credits for service since the plan began, would be the total monetary credits and employee contributions accumulated with Interest If the current employee contribution rate and city matching percent had always been in existence and If the employee's salary had always been the average of his salary in the last three years that are one year before h date, At retirement, benefit sum of the s accumulated cont ibutlons with Interest and theemployer•financed monetary edits withpint rest were used to purchase an annuity. Members can retire at ages 60 and above with 10 or more years of service or with 26 years of service regardless of age. The plan also provides death and disability benefits. A member is vested 38 r r. Notes, City of Denton {Continue(j) September 30, 1991 after ten years, but he must leave his accumulated contributions In the plan. If a member withdraws his own money, he Is not entitled to the employer.flnanced monetary credits, even if he was vested, The plan provisions are adopted by the governing body of the city, within the options avallable In the state statutes governing TMRS and within the actuarial constraints also in the statutes, Contrlbutlons- The contribution rate for -she employees Is 5%, and the city matching percent Is currently 200%, both as adopted by the governing body of the city. Under the state law governing TMRS, the city contribution rate is annually determined by the actuary. This rate consists of the normal cost contribution rate and the prior service contribution rate, both of which are calculated to be a level percent of payroll from year to year, The normal cost contrlbutlon rate finances the currently accruing monetary credits due to city matching percent, which are the obligation of the city as of an employee's retirement date, not at the time the employee's contributions are made, The normal cost contribution rate Is the actuarlally determined percent of payroll necessary to satisfy the obligation of the city to each employee at the time his retirement becomes effective. The prior service contribution rate amortizes the unfunded actuarial liability over the remainder of the plan's 25-year amortization period, When the city periodically adopts updated service credits and Increases in annuities In effect, the increased unfunded actuarial liability is to be amortized over a new 25-year period. Currently, the unfunded actuarial liability $a being amortized over the 25-year period which began January, 1991, The unit credit actuarial cost method is used for determining the city contribution rate. Contributions are made monthly by both the employees and the city, Since the city needs to know Its contribution rate In advance to budget for it, there is a one-year lag between the actuarial valuation that Is the basis for the rate and the calendar year when the rate goes Into effect, The city's total payroll In fiscal year 1991 was $23,371,197 and the city's contributions were based on a payroll of $21,120,188, Both the city and the covered employees made the required contributions, amounting to $1,078,635 (6.00% of covered payroll for the months in calendar year 1990, 4,17% normal cost plus 0,83% to amortize the unfunded actuarial liability, and 5,15% for the months In calendar year 1991, 4,34% normal cost plus 0,81% to amortize the unfunded actuarial liability) for the city and $1,062,662 (6%) for the empioyees. The city adopted changes In the plan since the previous actuarial valuation, which had the effect of increasing the city's contribution fate for 1991 by 0,02% of payroll, There were no related•part~, transactions. funding Status and Progress. Even though the substance of the city's plan is not to provide a defined banefIt In some form, some additional voluntary disclosure is appropriate due to the nontraditional nature of the defined contribution plan which had an Initial unfunded pension benefit obligation due to the monetary credits granted by the city for services rendered before the plan began and which can have addiflons to the unfunded pension benefit obligation through the periodic adoption of Increases In benefit credits and benefits, Statement No, 5 of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASH 5) defines pension benefit obligation as a standardized disclosure measure of the actuarial present value of pension benefits, adjusted for the affects of projected salary Increases, estimated to be payable in the future as a result of employee service to date, The measure is Intended to help users assess the funding status of publio employee pension plans, assess progress made In accumulating sufficient assets to pay benefits when due, and make comparisons among public employee pension plans, The pension benefit obligation shown below Is similar In nature to the standardized disclosure measure required by GASB 5 for defined benefit plans except that there Is no need to project salary Increases since the benefit credits earned for service to date are not dependent upon future salaries 39 • \ 1' r. ~f Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 The calculations were made as part of the annual actuarial valuation as of December 31, 1990, Because of the money-purchase nature of the plan, the Interest rate assumption, currently B•6% per year, does not have as much Impact on the results as It does for a defined benefit plan, Market value of assets is not determined for each city's plan, but the market value of assets for TMRS as a whole was 106.2% of book value as of December 31, 1990• Pension Benefit Obligation Annuitants currently receiving benefits $ 11861,369 Terminated employees 718,390 Current employees Accumulated employee contributions including allocated invested earnings 8,427,468 Employer•flnenced vested 8,745,842 Employe r•financod nonvested 2,785,771 Total $22,536,840 Not Assets Available for Benefits, at Book Value 19,345,511 Unfunded Pension Benefit Obligation $ 3,1910329 The book value of assets Is amortized cost for bonds and original cost for short-term securities and stocks, The actunriai assumptions used to compute the actuarially determined city contribution rate are the same as those used to compute the pension benefit obligation. The numbers above reflect the adoption of changes in the plan since the previous actuarial valuation, which had the effect of Increasing the pension benefit obligatlon by $132,681, Trend lnformatlon . Four lose Hlrtorlool Trend Information December $1, December 31, December 31, December 31, Year Ended 1987 1986 loss 1990 Net Assets Available for Benefits 811,643,689 $14,146,080 $16,633,114 $19,346,611 Penslon Benefit Ubllgatlon $13,666,302 $16,639,047 $19,319,318 $22,639,840 Percentage Funded 86,2% 86.0% 8611% 8618% Unfunded Penslon Sonefit Obligation $ 2,021,613 $2,492,967 $ 2,686,704 $ 3,191,329 Annual Covered Payroll $16,636,036 $18,148,919 018,947,816 $21,120,188 Unfunded Pension Benefit Obligation as a Percentage of Covered Payroll 12.2% 13.7% 14,2% 1511% City Contribution to TMRS $ 826,976 $988,006 $ 1,020,272 $ 1,078,836 Average City Rnte 6.0% 6.3% 5.4% 6.1% •40. - 41 t 1I ,l Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 ~w rend information prior to 1987 Is not available, Ten year trend information will not be shown separately until five years of data have been accumulated. Fireman's Relief and Retirement Plan, The City provides pension benefits for all Civil Service employees of the Fire Department through a defined contribution plan. The Board of Trustees of the Denton Fireman's Relief and Retirement Fund Is the adminlstrator for the pension plan. The Pension plan Is not considered a part of the City of Denton entity. In a defined contribution plan, benefits depend solely on amounts contributed to the plan plus Investment earnings. Fire employees are required to become a member o as a condition of employment. An employee becomes fully vested after 20 years of credited service. City contributions for, and Interest forfeited by, employees who leave employment before vesting are redistributed to plan participants, The City's total Fire Department portion of payroll in fiscal year 1991 was 45,580,546, doth the City and the covered employees made the required contribution (8,5;6 for 1990 and 9.0% for 1991), amounting to $296,824 from each source or 4593,648 in total, I (7) DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN The City offers Its employees a deferred compensation plan created In accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 457. The plan, available to all permanent City employees, permits them to defer, until future years, up to 25% of annual gross earnings not to exceed 47,500. The deferred compensation is not available to employees until termination, retirement, death, or unforeseeable emergency. All amounts of compensation deferred under the plan, all property and rights purchased with those amounts, and all Income attributable to those amounts, property, or rights are (until paid or made available to the employee or other beneficiary) solely the property and rights of the City (without being restricted to the provisions of benefits under the plan), subject only to the claims of the City's general creditors, Participants' rights under the plan are equal to those of general creditors of the City In an amount equal to the fair market value of the deferred account for each participant, Investments (primarily cash and cash equivalents) in the deferred compensation plan are recorded at market value, It is the opinion of the City's legal counsel that the City has no liability for losses under the plan but does have the duty of due care that would be required of an ordinary prudent Investor. The management of the Clty believes that it Is unlikely that it will use the assets to satisfy the claims of general creditors at this time. (8) SELF-INSURANCE PLAN The City has established a self-insurance plan for workers' compensation benefits and general liability, Accrued claims payable Include provisions for claims reported and claims Incurred but not reported, The provisions for reported claims is dete!mined by estimating the amount which will ultimately be paid each claimant, The provision for claims incurred but not yet reported Is estimated based on the City's experience. -41• c 1 + i fn i) Notes, City of Denton (Continued) Septomber 30, 1991 The costs associated with the self-insurance plan are reported as Interfund transactions. Accordingly, they are treated as operating revenues of the Expendable Trust Fund and operating expenditures (expenses) of the ether funds. (9) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Agreement with TMPA- In 1976, the City, along with the cities of Bryan, Greenville and Garland, Texas (the 'Cities") « entered Into a Power Sales Contract with the Texas Munlclpal Power Agency (TMPA), TMPA was created through concurrent ordinances of the Cities and Is governed by a Board of 01rectors consisting of eight members, two appointed by the governing body of each clty. Under the terms of the agreement, TMPA agreed to construct or acquire electric generating plants to supply energy and power to the Cities for a period of not less than 35 years. The Cities in turn agreed to purchase all future power and energy requirements In excess of the amounts generated by thelr systems from TMPA at prices Intended to cover operating costs and retirement of debt, In the event that revenues are Insufficient to cover all costs and retlre the outstanding debt, each of the Cities has guaranteed a portion of the unpaid debt based, generally, upon Its pro rata share of the energy delivered to consumers In the prior operating year. Asof September 30, 1991, total TMPA debt outstanding was approximately 91,233,000,000, and the City's guaranteed percentage is approximately 22%. In the opinlon of management, the possibility of a material payment under this guarantee Is remote in that TMPA Is generating operating proflts and assets exceed liabilities. TMPA operates a 390 megawatt lignlte•fueled generating plant. Should TMPA be dissolved, each City would bs entitled to an undivided Interest In the property, Selected financial statement information of TMPA is as follows: September 30, (Unaudited) 1991 1990 (000's) (000's) Operating Revenues 8 109,248 S 169,697 Operating Expanses 108,291 109,114 Operating Income 60,967 60,483 Other Nonoperating Sources (Uses) (69,947) (62,349) Current Assets 67,053 68,404 Total Assets 1,448,278 1,541,426 Long-Term Debt 1,366,056 1,457,679 Total Liabilities 1,426,367 1,512,638 Total Equity 21,911 28,788 r .42. ;v i Yg Y, Notes, City of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 Agreement with City of Dallas. During 1985, the City entered Into an agreement with the City of Dallas which provides foi the purchase of a minimum of 500,000 gallons/day of untreated water from the City of Dallas from Lake Lewisville, This contract will be effective for 30 years, Litigation- Various claims and lawsuits are pending against the City. In the opinion of City management ! and legal counsel, the potential losses, after insurance coverage, on all claims will not have a material effect on the City's financlal position as of September 30, 1991, (10) SEGMENT INFORMATION FOR ENTERPRISE FUNDS Segment Informatlon for the year ended September 30, 1991, was as follows: Utility System Sanitation Fund Total Operating Revenues 9 80,469,479 $3,723,009 $ 84,192,488 Depreciation 6,216,884 237,623 6,454,507 Operating Income 17,521,363 447,429 17,968,792 Operating Transfers Out 6,475,168 344,731 61819,899 Net Income 8,403,318 6,824 8,410,142 Current Capital Contributions; In aid of construction 429,991 429,991 Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable, gross 9,767,803 9,787,803 Allowance for uncollectlbles 6,324,914 5,324,914 Accounts receivable, net 4,442,889 4,442,889 Property, Plant and Equipment Additions 11,673,821 25,037 11,698,858 Total Assets 227,987,780 1,932,676 229,920,356 Net Working Capital (Deficit) 31,935,027 (224,517) 31,710,510 Bonds Payable 65,710,000 1,056,371 56,765,371 Notes Payable 55,643,008 65,643,008 Total Equity (Deflrlt) 101,836,567 (397,694) 101,438,873 The 86,000,000 advance from the Electric System to the Water and Sewer System Is eliminated in the combined Utility System financial statements, c •43• x t i, r, Notes, Clty of Denton (Continued) September 30, 1991 (11) INDIVIDUAL FUND DISCLOSURES Individual fund disclosures as of and for the year ended September 30, 1991, are as follows! Interfund Receivables and Payablea; Fund Interfund Ddicit Fund Reoalvablea tnteriun3 Payablea BalanonrRstalned 4ener11 11 11 al Fund Earnings tit any) d 134,821 Special Revenue Funds: 1111,266,090 Community Development atock Grant Rsarsatlon 17,120 3,428 Criminal Justloa 10.2l e ¢ Emily Fowler 26,877 9,466 (3,842) other 268 Debt Sarvlse 1801199 20,138 Capital NOJsot Fundat 67,197 Airport Improvement $treet Improvement 7,624 General Prolsota 8,424 62,022 Bond Program 372 Other Caplld Prolaob 60,310 17,666 , Enterprise Funds Utility system sanitation 4,181,077 4,489,018 Internal 66Mpe Funder 288,888 416,837 (387,884) Working Capital ; Motor Pool 187,969 27,121 Trust .xl Agenoy Funds; 139,608 Expandable Trust Agenoy, payrotl 123,148 36 Total 1,189,336 92,313 $6,467,623 $8,467,623 (12) SUBSEQUENT EVENT In December, 1991, the City Council granted a refund or credit to certain customers of the Denton iun1clpal , 1 Utility System who received electric utility service from October 1, 1990 September September 30 30, 1991, of 6,003 per kilowatt hour of ergrgy received during that porlod, an estimated amount of 62,339,000 representative of excess net revenues of the System, , through 44 C s ti COMBINING AND INDIVIDUAL FUNDFINANCIAL STATEMENTS i S [r=; CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS SUMMARY OF SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Community Development !flock Grant (ODBG) - to account for the operations of projects utilizing Community Development Block Grant Funds: Such revenues are restricted to expenditures for r specified projects by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Recreation - to account for the revenues and expendltures for the recreation programs which are self. supporting, All expenditures will be reimbursed 100°x. Various business operations, such as concessions, fall Into this account: Cr/mina/ Justloe - to account for revenue received from the State of Texas Criminal Justice Division, E'mpy Fowler Llbrary -to account for fines, donations, memorials and gifts to the library that are restricted to the Public Library, All Other • to account for miscollaneous special revenue sources which ere required to finance specific activities, s r M r •as• \ t Comprahenelve Annued Flnenclal Report I t CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET - ALL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Community Development Criminal ASSETS Block Grant Recreatlon Justice Cash and deposits + @ 19,713 177,939 @ Investments ` Receivables (net of allowances for uncollectibles) Accrued interest Other u 17,044 3,331 126 Due from other funds 17,120 Due from other governments 26'877 62,773 37,613 Total Assets @106,660 @81,270 864,621 LIABILIVES AND FUND BAIANCE Liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued expenses @70,360 @ 9,132 Due to other funds @66,708 3,42R 10,219 9,466 Deferred revenues 19,387 61000 Totsi Liabilities 93,146 24, 3 G 1 68,183 Fund Balance (Deficits): Reserved for Encumbrance= 9,334 6,074 Unreserved 4,171 60,846 Total Fund Balance ;Deficits) {3,642} 13,605 68,919 13(3,6421 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance @108,860 @81,270 @64,521 i •46• Comprehensive Annual Financial Report t YYS31tl r}rd Y, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Totals Emily Fowler All Library Other September 30, 1991 September 30, 1990 864,391 $770,380 b 922,423 8 524,657 4 28,000 28,000 116 116 r 2,021) 22,620 11,601 tsr 289 1801199 204,465 336,000 1 19,627 109,920 184,648 564;661:` $980,342 $1,287,444 $1,056;908 510,086 4 4,290 B 162,566 8 46,111 20,136 43,238 88,121 26 24,392 11,361 10,111 24,426 220,196 144,693 16,031 1,030 31,469 167,760 290619 964,886 1,036,779 763,653 44,650 966,916 1,087,248 911,313 , 41154t$611, 4.980,342 41,287,44 51,066,906 •47• ` Comprehenelve Annual Flnenclal Report y !I l" , R r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES ALL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 I i Community Criminal Development Block Grant Recreation Justice REVENUES: 4 99,435 Intergovernmental 6479,719 4 447,680 Fees for services 22 Interest revenue 26,135 Miscellant,rus 28,678 808,420 473,716 99,435 TotalRevenua EXPENDITURES Current- General government 504,030 • 126,891 Public safety Public works 400,778 Parks and recreation 4,011 Capital outlay 128,891 Total Expenditures 504,030 404,787 EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER tUNDER) EXPENDITURES 4,390 88,828 (28,468) OTHER FINANCING SOURCES IUSESLr Proceeds of long-term debt 25,468 Operating Transfers In Operating Transfers Out 28,468 Total Other Financing Sources (Used EXCESS OF REVENUES AND OTHER SOURCES OVER IUNDER) EXPENDITURES AND OTHER 4,390 88,928 USES FUND BALANCES • October 1 _ 9,115 (12,009) 13,8421 FUND BALANCES (Deficits) • September 30 4 131606 466,819 4 {3,6421 .48. \ Comprehensive Annual Financial Report , C x - i ~i 4 sr CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Totals -W""- Emily Fowler All Year Ended Llbrary Other September 30, 1991 September 30, 1990 w 9 8161,766 $ 740,910 38,368 121,499 81,026,733 6,231 607,447 484,731 763 7,018 23,354 109,675 9,755 167,843 „Y 87;953 431,642 393,893 1;643,216 MUM-W® 11,226 383,131 898,386 1,486,290 18,344 142,235 106,986 99,044 99,044 40,167 400,776 486,142 7,646 61,824 163,798 51;392 508,166° 1,692;285 2,234,196 16,661 (112,4721 (49,049) (282,334) 9,009 9,009 184,618 210,974 (16,0001 408,494 9,009 (16,000) 189,518 204,983 408,494 26,670 67,046 18,980 156,934 126,180 888,870 911,314 844,560 1, 956,918 785,153 91,087,248 8 911,313 •49• Comprehensive Annual FInenclal Report F 'w u f!: -WOAYtyO i! CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 9 ,Vol •60t - - Comprahemiva Annual Flnrnalal flepon I Y. Py:-'JAY(' CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS SUMMARY OF CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Ahport Improvement Grant Fund - to account for FAA Grant in aid for runway extensfun and airport development, Genera/ Projects Funds - to account for Investing nonrecurring funds In capital plant expansion or Improvements, extraordinary maintenance projects, facility construction orother large nonrecurring, projects, funded by operating revenues, Street Improvement Fund - to account for repairs and rehabilitation of city streets funded by grants and bond proceeds, W1111s rs Square Fund - to account for paving downtown parking lot to provide parking lot in central business district funded by bond proceeds, Constructlon Ptolects Fund - to account for major rehabilitatlon and construction of facilities funded by bond funds, Other - to account for miscellaneous capital revenues and expenditures. a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report t ,a I`I CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS si COMBINING BALANCE SHEET - ALL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Airport Street ASSETS improvement Gront General Projects Improvements Williams Square Cash and deposits 844,178 82,094,068 8 908,374 Investments 812,660 ' 2,313,287 Receivables (net of allowance for uncollectibies): • Accruad Interest - 46,095 Other receivables 22,149 Due from other funds 8,424 Due from other go, rnments Total Assets 866,326 82,094,068 83,276,180 $12,660 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued oxpenes 813,370 81,287,076 8 8 Hetalnr~e payable Due to other funds 7,624 372 62,022 Other liabilities Deferred revenues 9,361 1,166 Total Liabilities 22,149 1,287,447 61,373 Fund Balances: Reserved for encumbrances 698,902 1,696,441 Reserved for capital , projects 44,176 107,719 1,517,366 12,660 Total Fund Balances 44,176 806,821 3,213,807 12,660 Total Liabilities and Fund Balances 8681326 82,094,088 83,275,180 812,660 -62- Comprehensive Annual Financial Report - ` ~.r f ~ i! , CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS ' _ Totals Constructlon Projects Other September 30, 1991 September 30, 1990 $1,506,621 $4,403 $ 4,570,202 $ 616,094 6,768,601 8,081, 788 10,102,001 70,396 115,491 226,763 22,149 60,310 - 68,734 665,000 1,287 1,287 28,342 $7,406,828 86,890 $12,069,e61 411,637,190 M1hdr° mm $3,477,671 $1,287 $ 4,779,403 4 402,496 33,896 33,896 160,974 17,666 77,573 667,840 9,361 9,351 1,155 33,000 3,529,121 1,287 4,901,377 111631060 631,066 3,026,398 1,631,966 3,246,662 4,403 4,931,878 8,541,574 3,876,707 4,403 7,968,274 10,373,630 $7,406,826 88,690 612,869,661 811,637,190 53 Comprehanslve Annual Flnenclol Report i a t r ~ x r ' CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS R a COMBINING STATEMENT OF t ZVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - E ALL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Airport Street Improvement Grant General Projects Improvement Williams Square f REVENUES: Intergovernmental 6299,680 $ 29,096 8 0 Interest revenue 42,160 286,134 Miscellaneous 28,956 64,103 Total Revenues 299,680 100,202 340,237 EXPENDITURES: Capital outlay 297,803 391,991 1,165,360 63 Total Expenditures 297,803 391,991 1,156,360 63 EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 1,877 (291,789) (816,123) 163) OTHER FBVANCING SOURCES (USES): Proceeds of long-tern debt 200,000 Operating transfers In Total Oft; Fkwcin9 Sources (Us$$) 200,000 EXCESS OF REVENUES AND OTHER SOURCES OVER {UNDER) EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES 1,877 (91,7119) (816,123) (83) FUND BALANCES • Ottober 1 42,299 898,410 4,028,930 12,623 FUND BALANCES - September 30 6 44,178 6806,621 $3,213,807 812,660 • 64. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 4 C 4 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Totals Y'ar Ended Consttuctlon Projects Other September 30, 1991 September 30, 1990 9 b 4 328,776 9 18,176 381,573 709,867 759,206 591,371 2,100 676,530 12,631 972,944 2,100 1,716,163 790,013 2,483,847 1,386 4,330,419 5,603,087 2,483,847 1,356 4,330,419 6,603,097 (1,610,903) 745 (2,615,266) (4,713,0841 200,000 111601000 200,000 1,160,000 (1,510,9031 745 12,416,268) (3,563,084) 5,387,610 31668 10,373,530 13,936,614 4 3;876,707 $4,403 9r 7,958,274 910,373,630 , 56 - Comprehensive Annual Flnanclal Report \ C 5 rce'~aa~ a_s,wti~A CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS F, c „t A 56• \ - Comprehenalve Annual Flnenclal Repert t 1?:YYi i:,l?y /yi't ZNy) A I.V IN 11(544 1. ~t l CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS SUMMARY OF ENTERPRISE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Utility System - To account for the provision of utility services to the residents of the City. All activities necessary to provide such services are accounted for in this Fund, Including, but not limlted to, administration, operations, maintenance, financing and related debt service. Sen/tatlon - To account for the provision of sanitation services to the residents of the City. All activities necessary to provide such services are accounted for In this Fund, Including, but not limited to, administration, operations, maintenance, financing and related debt service. .67 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report a C - is tan,<.i'8 r• ~ i; s t u CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET • ALL ENTERPRISE FUNDS SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Y I ASSETS Utility System Cash and deposits 6 w Investments 28,743,226 Receivables (net of allowances for uncollectibles) . Accounts 4,442,889 Unbllled utllity service 4,066,170 Accrued Interest 669,319 Other 393,118 i Due from other funds 3,930,737 Merchandise Inventory 1,330,896 Deferred bond Issuance costs 879,001 Restricted assets . Cash and deposits 6,097,266 Investments 28,249,616 Accrued Interest 373,000 r. Due from other funds 230,340 Advance to other funds 600,000 Fixed assets (net of accumulated depreclotlon) 147,392,206 Total Assets 8227,987,780 A •68• (t Comprehensive Annual Financial Report CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Totals Sanitation September 30, 1991 September 30, 1990 1 $ 1 58,763 28,743,225 16,697,385 4,442,889 4,966,741 e 162,171 6,008, 341 4,983,232 669,319 423,847 ~i 120,161 613,279 687,983 T! 268,668 4,199,405 81886,691 1,330,89b 1,554,934 870,001 930,642 260,607 8,347,872 676,432 28,249,616 38,721,404 373,000 640,841 230,340 371,742 6001000 600,000 1,140,969 148,633,174 143, 288,823 11;932,876 1229,920,366 $222,374,480 ! (Continued) . 69- Comprehensive Annual Financial deport - - - e 6 V CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS_ COMBINING BALANCE SHEET - ALL ENTERPRISE FUNDS Icontinuedl SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY Utility System • Liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued expenses 6 6,020,780 Retainage payable 9,760 Accumulated unpaid compensated absences 390,029 Meter deposits 1,113,766 yr/ Deterred Revenue yr Payable from restricted assets P Accounts payable and accrued expenses 871,830 Retainage payable 432,429 Due to other funds 1'022'813 Accrued Interest 1,470,602 Revenue and general obligation bonds payable, current 31606,000 Due to other funds 3,466,106 Revenue bonds payable 62,206,000 General obligation bonds payable Advance from Electric Nate Payable 66,643,006 Total Liabilities r 126,161,213 FUND EQUITY: Contributed capital From other municipalities or governmental units 14,903,082 In aid of construction 21,862,264 Retained earnings (deficit) _ Reserved for capital projects 17,068,672 Reserved for band retirement 10,678,776 Unreserved (deficit) 37,423,784 Tott4 Fund Equity (Daflc:ltl 101,836,667 Total Liabilities and Fund Equity $227,987,780 C 60. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Totals Sanitation September 30, 1991 September 30, 1990 $ 234,671 S 6,265,451 S 3,155,261 9,750 9,750 114,909 604,938 446,573 - 1,113,766 1,137,794 001 871,830 464,236 432,429 107,894 1,022,913 1,000,000 9,382 1,479, 984 1,570,449 122,150 3,627,160 3,022,850 416,937 3,882,043 7,937,364 52,205,000 66,710,000 933,221 933,221 1,056,371 6001000 500,000 500,000 65,643,008 63,659,188 2,330,270 128,481,483 129,775,720 14,903,082 14,903,082 21,862,264 21,432,263 , • 17,088,672 23,802,222 119,075 10,697,860 10,441,768 (516,769) 36,907,016 22,019,406 (397,694) 101,438,873 92,698,740 $1,932,676 i 9229,920,366 8222,374,460 61 - Comprehensive Annual Financial Report A d iSit y d; fSAy.i 1A 2 4 i% CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS ALL ENTERPRISE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 OPERATING REVENUES: Utility System Sanitation E!ectdc service Water service $63,715,444 8 , Sewer service 10,699,660 Charges for services 6,624,893 Sundry 310,660 3,628,2B6 Total Operating Revenues 118,942 109,628 a 80,469,479 3,637,794 OPERATING EXPENSES: L~- Purchased power Fuel 41,457,675 Purchase of water 2,066,266 Salaries and wages 88,125 Materials and supplias 8,268,209 1,622,996 Maintenance and repairs 900,266 289,762 Depreciation 2,433,406 612,151 Miscellaneous 6,216,884 237,623 Total Operating Expenses 1,627,296 613,049 62,948,116 3,276,680 Operating Income 17,621,363 362,214 NONOPERATINO REVENUES {EXPENSES}; Interest revenue Interest expense and fiscal charges 4,103,243 Other (6,649,442) (78,327} a Total Nonoperat)ng Revenues (Expenses) 1198,678) (17,647) 12,842,877} (96,874) Income Before Operating Transfers 14,878,886 2fi6,340 OPERATING TRANSFERS 11N) OPERATING TRANSFERS !OUT) 86,216 Net Income (6,476,169) (344,731) 8,403,316 6,824 RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICIT) - October 1 RETAINED EARNINGS {DEFICIT) -September 30 56,667,913 (404,518) $66,071,231 6 1397,6941 -{12, Comprehensive Annual Flnanclel Report \1 r 1'Y i;l.kt1,1, • . lL•`a CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS TOtals Year Ended September 30, 1991 September 30, 1990 463,715,444 862,880,319 10,899,660 9,734,904 8,624,893 5,263,661 31838,916 3,696,917 228,470 162,749 R 84,107,273 81,637,660 41,457,676 42,346,467 2,066,266 1,402,344 88,126 9,881,204 9,325,796 11190,018 1,198,132 2,945,667 3,078,486 6,454,507 6,525,810 2,140,344 2,066,885 66,223,896 65,942,869 17,883,577 15,594,681 4,103,243 3,947,779 (6,827,7691 15,286,7161 (214,226) (260,6611 {2,738,751) (1,699,4871 15,144,826 13,695,194 85,215 (61819,8991 {6,703,172) 8,410,142 6,992,022 66,263,396 49,271,373 884,673,537 466,263,395 83- Comprehensive Annual Finenclal Report - - C l U J ' t, t V r 1~ J CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS - ALL ENTERPRISE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Ceah flows from operating activities, Utility System Sanitation Cash received from customers ° B 86,660,663 $3,049,961 Cash paid to employees for services 18,229,682) Cash paid to suppliers (1,692,167) 149,087,796) (1,666,299) ` Net cash provided by (used for) oparations 28,343,106 602,496 vs Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Operating Transfers (6,476,1881 Net cash 1269,6181 Provided by (used for) nonoapital financing activities (6,476,1681 (269,618) Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Contributed capital 429,991 Proceeds from th9 sale of contractual obligation Proceeds from notes payable Interest paid 2,O0i,000 Principal paid on contractual obligation (8'748'120) (96,874) Acquisition of fixed assets (3,603,000) {122,150} 111,673,1 (26,0371 Net change to restrloted assets 6,477,488 Net change to deferred cost Advance from Electric 61,6641 41 Net cash provided by (wed for) capital related activities (12,968,841) $,081) A Cash flows from investing activities: Advance to other funds Proceeds from sale of Investment securit(os Interest received on Investments 63,07,380 Purchase of investment securities 4,1103,243 (88, 23,420) Principal paid on notes payable ( Nat cash provided b (23,180) Y (used for) Investing ecKlvitles (8,986,777) Not increase In cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents October 1 68, 166,88881 1) (82} Cash and cash 8Y equivalents September 30 8 8 C -64- Comprehensive Annual Financial Report i Y. a CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS_ Totals Year EndeI September 30, 1991 Septembor 30, 1990 8 89,310,634 4 76,365,762 (9,821,839) (9,245,879) r (60,643,096) (48,990,698) 28,946,600 18,119,186 (6,734,684) (8,703,172) (6,734,684) (6,703,172) 429,991 340,963 20,000,000 2,007,000 1,980,127 16,841,994) 15,647,266) (3,627,160) 13,022,850) (11,698,868) (8,092,463) 6,477,468 (18,806,673) 81,641 (39,9951 600,000 113,201,902) (12,687,167) 1600,0001 " 55,707,580 15,818,663 4,103,243 3,647,779 (88,753,420) (20,864,3071 (23,180) (1,430,812) (8,986,777) (3,328,6871 (66,763) (4,699,841) 66,763 4,656,604 9 $ 66,763 65- Comprehensive Annual Flnanclal Report 4 1z IV, 3 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS - ALL ENTERPRISE FUNDS (Continued) 1ti FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Utility system Sanitation Reconciliation of Enterprise Operating Funds Income to Net Cech Provided by (used for) Operating Activities Operating Income (loss) $17,521,363 $ 367.,214 Adjustments: Depreclatiun expense 6,216,864 237,623 Decrease Ilncreasel In receivables 602,828 (66,853) Decrease (Increase} in due from other funds 4,688,276 08,010 Decrease (Increase) in Inventorles 224,039 Increase (Decrease) In accounts payable ?,9&0,977 219,223 Increase (Decrease) in leases payable 124,028) Increase (Decrease) In accumulated unpaid compensated absences 28,627 301838 Increase (Decrease) In due to other funds (3,696,7611 (369,660) Total adjustments 10,821,742 140,281 Net cash provided by (used for) operating "vitles 828,343,105 4 502,4915 •86• Comprehensive Annual Financial Report v. t1. Ik" CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS` Totals Year Ended September 30, 1991 September 30, 1990 917,883,677 815,594,681 • 6,464,507 6,525,810 618,976 (306,054) 4,906,288 (4,875,734) 224,039 1980,711) 3,100,200 414,234 (24,028) 132,588 59,366 79,88E (4,066,321) 11522,505 10,962,023 2,624,604 828,845,600 918,119,186 r a .67- Comprehens)vo Annual Flnanclat Report CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS_ SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS - BUDGET AND ACTUAL - (BUDGET BASIS) • ALL ENTERPRISE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Utility S1ostem Variance- Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) OPERATING REVENUES: Electric service $83,782,000 $63,715,444 $ (66,856) Water service 11,720,000 10,699,660 (1,020,460) Sewer service 7,182,000 5,624,893 (1,657,107) Charges far services 269,000 310,660 61,650 Sundry 1,032,000 118,942 (913,068) Total Operating Revenues $3,976,000 80,469,479 (3,605,6211 OPERATING EXPENSES: Purchased power 43,256,180 41,467,675 1,798,605 Fuel 3,081,810 2,086,266 1,016,644 Purchase of water 219,560 88,125 131,436 Salaries and wages 9,601,787 8,749,084 852,703 Materials and supplies 11169,395 883,024 286,371 Maintenance and repairs 3,476,177 2,084,917 1,391,260 Miscellaneous 6,980,352 1,796,696 4,183,657 Capital outlay 3,021,060 1,362,750 1,668,310 Total Operating Expenses 69,806,321 58,478,636 11,327,786 Operating Income 14,168,679 21,990,943 7,822,264 NONOPERATING REVENUES IEXPENSES): Interest revenue 890,000 4,103,243 3,213,243 Interest expenses and fiscal charges (7,848,000) 16,549,442) 1,298,566 Other 1200,000) (196,678) 3,322 + Total NonopseWng Revenues IExpennusl (7,168,000) (2,642,877) 4,615,123 Income Before Operating Transfers 7,010,679 19,348,066 12,337,387 OPERATINU TRANSFERS IN OPERATING TRANSFERS (PUT) (6,475,168) (6,475,188) Net Income 636,511 12,872,898 12,337,387 RETAINED EARNINGS • October 1 48,318,532 $6,667,913 8,349,381 RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICIT) • September 30 (Budget Basis) 48,864,043 69,640,811 20,686,788 ENCUMBRANCES AND CAPITAL OUTLAYS NET OF DEPRECIATION (4,469,680) 14,489,680) RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICIT) - September 30 (GAAP Basis) $44,384,4e3 066,071,231 $200886,768 Be- Comprehensive Annual Financial Report ti r l1 't I• CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i Sanitation Total Variance- Variance- Favorable Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Budget Actual (Unfavorablel 4 4 4 $63,782,000 463,716,444 4 (66,556) 11,720,000 10,699,550 (1,020,450) 7,182,000 5,624,893 (1,567,107) 3,530,660 3,528,266 (2,394) 3,789,660 3,838,916 49,266 206,209 109,528 196,681) 1,238,209 _ 228,470 11,009,739) 3,736,869 3,637,794 (99,076) 87,711,869 84,107,273 13,604,6961 43,256,180 41,467,675 1,798,606 3,081,810 2,066,286 1,015,644 219,560 88,126 131,436 1,674,263 1,620,166 (45,902) 11,176,060 10,369,249 806,801 333,987 287,371 46,616 1,503,382 1,170,395 332,987 426,647 506,417 178,770) 3,902,824 2,690,334 1,312,490 818,501 598,767 (219,7441 6,798,853 2,395,452 4,403,401 61,692 42,684 19,108 3,082,752 1,395,334 1,687,418 3,215,090 3,054,294 160,796 73,021,411 61,632,630 11,488,581 521,779 583,500 61,721 14,690,458 22,574,443 7,883,985 890,000 4,103,243 3,213,243 (182,287) (78,327) 103,940 18,030,2671 (6,627,769) 1,402,498 (20,000) (17,547) 2,453 (220,000) (214,2251 6,775 (202,267) (95,8741 106,393 (7,360,2671 (2,738,7511 4,621,516 319,612 487,626 168,114 7,330,191 19,835,692 12,505,601 86,215 85,216 85,216 86,215 044,731) (344,731) (0,819,889) (8,819,899) 59,996 228,110 168,114 7,696,607 13,101,008 12,505,501 (394,643) (404,618) 19,8761 47,923,889 66,263,395 8,339,506 262,835 1176,408) 158,239 48,619,396 69,364,403 20,845,007 (221,286) 1221,2861 (4,690,8061 (4,690,866) 6 (555,9331 8 (397,694) 4 168,239 843,828,630 $64,873,637 420,845,007 •69• \ - Comprehensive Annual Financial Report - I .CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET • UTILITY SYSTEM 1% SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 ASSETS Electric System Cash and deposits Investments 9 Receivables (net of allowances for uncollectibles) • 28,743,226 Accounts Unbllled utility service 4,442,889 Accrued Interest 3,866,929 Other 669,319 300 217,049 Due from other funds Merchandise Inv rntory 2,404,639 Deferred bond issuance costs 1,330,895 Restricted ossets • '72,138 Cash and deposits investments 3,629,426 Accrued Interest 12,407,673 Due from other funds 99,369 Advtnce to other funds and sub-funds 91690 Fixed assets (rat Of accumulated depreciation) 61600,000 Total Assets 38,886,498 8103,679,62 A C 70. Comprehensive Annual f rnancial Report - 1 i V I2`i:ryA(C~ ' ail yqY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Totals for Utility System Water and Sewer System September 30, 1991 September 30, 1990 0 b 0 58,681 28,743,225 15,697,385 4,442,869 4,955,741 , 989,241 4,856,170 4,816,039 669,319 423,847 176,069 393,118 668,697 Aloo, 1,526,098 3,930,737 6,519,013 Pi 1,330,895 1,554,934 406,863 879,001 930,642 2,467,839 6,097,265 556,367 16,842,043 28,249,616 38,721,404 273,641 373,000 640,641 220,760 230,340 238,420 61600,000 500,000 108,505,707 147,392,205 141,935,268 0130,408,251 0233;987,780 ` 0220,215,269 71. Compraharl.lye Annual Financial Report C C C 4 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET • UTILITY SYSTEM jCanllnuedl SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY Electric system Llabilitl s: Accounts payable and accrued expenses 6 3,7 TJ,661 Retalnage payable Accumulated unpaid compensated absences 244,368 r Deposits 1,113,788 Payable from restricted assets - Accounts payahle and accrued expensos 430,276 Retalnage payable 417,496 v✓ Due to other funds 969,467 Accrued Interest 760,648 Revenue bonds payable, current 1,860,640 Due to other funds 1,983,107 Revenue bonds payable 26,696,340 Advance from Electric Notes payable Total UaWttuea 38,176,669 Fund Equity; Contributed capital - From other municipalities or governmental units 13,060 In aid of construction 1,260,976 Retained earnings - Reserved for future CIP 6,992,974 Reserved for bond retirement 6,724,647 Unreserved (deficit) 62,411,314 Total Fund Equity 66,402,870 Total Liabilities and Fund Equity 4103,679,529 .72. - Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 1g a I ri:r....;+; s} CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, } Totals for Utility System Water and Sewer System September 30, 1991 September 30, 1990 4 2,310,119 S 6,020,780 S 31139,803 9,750 9,750 9,780 6 145,671 390,029 361,602 1,113,766 1,137,794 441,564 871,830 464,236 14,933 432,429 107,894 63,446 1,022,913 1,000,000 709,954 1,470,802 1,669,977 1,854,460 3,605,000 2,900,000 1,482,999 3,468,108 7,161,867 26,508,660 52,206,000 66,710,000 810001000 810001000 65,643,008 66,643,008 63,669,188 93,974, 664 132,151,213 127,212,011 14, 890,022 14, 903,082 14,903,082 20,601,279 21,862,264 21,432,263 11,075,698 17,068,672 23,802,?22 a 4,854,228 10,578,775 10,322,693 )14,987,530) 37,423,784 22,542,998 36,433,697 101,836,667 93,003,288 8130,408,261 0233;987,780 $220,215,269 l3 f Comprehensive Annual Flnenclal Report \ e ~r TV y ii CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS - s u. t COMBINING SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS • UTILITY SYSTEM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR EMDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 t ~ Water and Sewer Electric System System I OPERATING REVENUES; Electric service $63,715,444 $ Water service 10,699,560 Sewer service 6,624,893 Charges for services 310,660 Sundry 118,942 Total Operating Revenues 64,026,094 16,443,365 OPERATING EXPENSES: Purchased power 40,378,316 1,079,369 Fuel 2,062,632 3,734 Purchase of water 88,126 Salaries and wages 4,384,812 3,873,397 Materials and supplies 396,434 603,822 Maintenance and repairs 1,221,763 1,211,643 Depreciation 3,014,911 3,201,973 Miscellaneous 724,186 803,109 Total Operaling, Expenses 52,182,964 10,765,162 Operating Income 11,843,140 5,678,223 NONOPERATING REVENUES {EXPENSES): Interest revenue 3,176,530 926,713 Interest expense and fiscal charges (2,335,8481 (4,213,6941 Other (91,138) (106,640) Total Nonopersting Revenues (Expenses) 749,644 (3,392,421( Income Before Operating Transfers 12,692,684 2,285,802 OPERATING TRANSFERS (OUT) (3,718,686) (2,766,682) Net income 8,874,098 (470,780) RETAINED EARNINGS - Ocfobar 1 65,264,737 1,413,176 RETAINED EARNINGS • September 30 $64,128,836 $ - 942,396 •74• Comprehensive Annual Flnencial Report - 1. 1 ' ,4 1 E~ CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Totals for Utility System Year Ended f September 30, 1991 September 30, 1990 $63,716,444 $62,880,319 10,699,550 9,734,904 5,624,893 5,283,661 310,860 366,271 118,942 79,444 80,469,479 78,124,699 .J~ 41,457,676 42,345,467 2,086,266 1,402,344 88,125 8,268,209 7,890,238 900,266 919,284 2,433,408 2,478,996 6,216,884 6,289,117 1,627,295 1,632,834 62,948,116 62,868,277 17,521,363 16,266,322 4,103,243 3,847,779 (8,549,442) (5,168,184) (196,678) 1260,661) (2,642,877) 11,770,966) 14,878,486 13,496,366 (6,476,1681 (6,308,436) 8,403,318 7,186,931 68,667,913 49,480,982 465,071,231 466,667,913 75 Oomprehenelve Annual Financial Report f, ell er t' l _CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS • UTILITY SYSTEM i FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 } Electric Water and Sewer Cash flows from operating activities; System System Cash received from customers $70,684,780 Cash paid to employees for services 81b,07b,803 Cash paid to suppUers 14,383,9221 (3,846,7801 _ 141,280,1351 (7,807,861) 4 Net cash provided by ;used for) operations 24,920,723 3,422;.z82 Cash flows from noncapital financing acilvftles: Transfers out (3,718,6881 {2,7b8,682) Net cash provided by fused for) nonceplial financing activities 13,718,588) (2,756,682) Cash flows from capital and related financing actlvities: Contributed capital Proceeds from the sale of contractual obligation 3T299 392,692 i Proceeds from Notes Payable Interest paid 2,007,000 Principal patd on contractual obligation 11(2,426,986) (4,364,134) Acquisition of fixed assets ,860,640 (1,884,480) Net change to restricted assets 7(8,769,130) } (2,160,6911 Net change to deferred cost ,838,296 (1,180,828} Advance from Electric 27'983 23,878 Net cash provided by Wood for) capital related actlvlttea 8,000,000 16133310981 (1,626,743) Cash flows from Investing activities: Advance to other funds Proceeds from sale of Investment securities (6,000,000) Interest received on investments 66,707,680 Purchase of investment securities 3,178,530 926,713 Prenclpal pold on Notes Payable 188,763,4201 Not cash provided by fused fort investing activities (23,6801 (15,869,310) 903,633 Net Increase fn cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents October 1 (271) (66,4101 Cash and cash 271 68,- 0 equivalence September 30 $ 70• Comprehensive Annual Financial Report t v CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i Totals Year Ended September 30, 1991 September 30, 1990 4 65,660,683 $ 73,247,901 18,229,682) 17,894,421) (49,087,798) 147,387,687) 28,343,106 17,966,593 . (8,475,1681 (6,308,4361 (8,476,168) 16,308,436) 429,991 340,953 20,000,000 2,007,000 1,980,127 (6,748,120} (6,418,736) (3,506,0001 (21900,000) (11,673,821) (8,084,996) 6,477,468 (18,805,673) 61,641 (39,995) 8,000,000 16,988,841) (12,928,319) (61000,000) (5001Or0) 66,707,580 17,077,707 , 4,103,243 2,388,726 (88,763,420) (20,864,307) (23,180) (1,430,812) (14,966,7771 (3,328,667) (56,691) (4,699,8481 66,681 4,666,629 4 = 0 - 4 68,681 ~m 77 - Comprehensive Annual Financial Report - P p, a CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS UTILITY SYSTEM (Continued) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Etootric Water and Sewer System System Reconel".-Ilon of Enterprise Operating Funds Income to Net Cash Providc' by (usr t i..r) Operating Activities Operating Income Iloss) 611,843,140 Adjustments; 8 6'678'223 Depreciation expense 3,014,911 3,201,973 Decrease (Increase) In receivables 448,469 Decrease (Increase) In due from other funds 164,368 s 8,110,227 11,621,961) Decrease (Increase) In inventories 224,039 Increase (Decrease) in accounts payable 1,819,978 11060,999 Increase (Decrease) in leases payable (24,028) Increase (Decrease) In accumulated unpaid t compensated absences 890 27,637 Increase (Decrease) in due to other funds 1,483,107 16,178,888) Total adjustments 13,077,683 (2,266,841) Net cash provided by (used for) operating eotivltles 624- g2,729 'Q 3, ' 422,382 -78- Comprehensive Annual Financial Report C i ~i CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 11 i f Totals ( Year Ended September 30, 1991 September 30, 1990 e 017,621,363 816,266,322 6,216,884 6,289,117 802,828 1387,2861 4,688,276 14,609,4131 224,039 (968,711( 2,880,977 636,331 124,0281 132,688 28,627 (4,186) (3,696,7811 1,590,849 10721,742 2,699,271 028,343,106 ' t 17,9~a a 79 Comprehensive Annual Ftnenclal Report s L sir Y n CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 1 i F • s/ { A C •8o• Comprehensive Annual Financlat Report 5 ..t CITY OF DErITON, TEXAS { ! SUMMARY OF INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Working Capita/ Fund • to account for the financing of goods and services provided by the Warehouse, Municipal Garage, and Machine Shop to other City departments. Such costs provided by the Warehouse are billed to the other departments at mandard labor charges and cost of parts plus 12%. Municipal Garage and Machine Shop billings include labor charges and cost of parts plus 25%. Actual costs Include depreciation on the building, Improvements, machinery and equipment used to provide the service. Motor Pool Fund • to account for the purchase of Clty vahlcles not budgeted In other funds. These vehicles are then leased to other City departments. Monthly charges are equal to the vehicle cost less salvage value divided by expected life of vehicle. 81 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report < p t l CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS lz COMBINING BALANCE SHEET • AL.L INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS J SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 ASSETS Working Capita! Motor Ponl j M Cash and deposits $ S 464,992 f Investments 4,236,269 Receivables 6,152 92,668 Due from other funds 187,969 139,608 Merchandise Inventory 1,684,920 Fixed assets (net of accumulated depreciation) 281,370 2,522,914 Total Assets $2,160,411 $7,456,231 0 LLABILfTIES AND FUND EQUITY Llabilitlas: Accounts payable and accrued expenses 61,796,049 $ 62,186 Leases payable 21,829 Accumulated unpaid compensated absences 21,343 Due to other funds 27,121 - Contractual obligation 2,019,668 Total Liabilities 1,866,342 2,071,863 Fund Equity, Contributed capital - From other municipalities or governmental units 281,391 4,033,646 Retained earnings 13,678 1,349,732 Total Fund Equity 296,069 5,383,378 Total Liabilities and Fund Equity $2,160,411 $7,466,231 •92• Comprehensive Annual Financial Report / C 1 .i CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS I k Totals Sagtembar 30 1891 September 30, 1990 $ 484,992 8 72,064 4,235,269 4,422,506 98,710 60,722 327,477 + 1,684,920 1,680,648 2,804,284 2,920,996 09,815,842 $9;026,934 ra+r 81,847,234 4 266,364 21,829 35,218 21,343 21,489 27,121 1,380,663 2,019,668 2,430,000 3,937,195 4,135,704 4,315,037 4,187,177 1,363,410 724,053 5,678,447 4,891,230 r $9,616,642 $9,123,934 83 - Comprehensive Annual Flnenclal Report C `i r Vw I CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS - ALL INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Working Capital Motor Pool OPERATING REVENUES: Charges for goods and services $3,859,735 $1,909,080 Miscellaneous 251,960 116,835 Tout Operating Revenues 4,111,966 1,726,916 f OPERATING EXPENSES: E e Salaeos and wages 622,778 I Materials and supplies 3,110,941 Maintenance and repairs 62,463 Depreciation 32,915 1,284,450 0+ Miscellanrous 235,319 44,614 Total Operating Expenses 4,054,416 1,329,064 Operating Income (Lose) 67,269 396,861 NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES): Gain Noss) on dlaposal 2,043 71,632 Interest revenue 366,976 Interest expense and fiscal charges (2,369) 1168,196) Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) 1316) 260,413 Income Before Operating Trantfars 5e,963 657,264 OPERATING TRANSFERS (OUT) (74,860) Net Income (Loss) (17,9071 667,264 RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICITI • October 1 31,686 692,468 RETAINED EARNINGS • September 30 9 13,678 41,349,732; -84- Comprehensh,e Annual Flnanclel Report C i t CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i Totals Year Ended September 30, 1991 September 30, 1990 f $5,468,815 $6,038,767 368,788 27,394 6,837,600 5,064,161 622,778 584,371 i 3,110,941 2,795,477 52,463 24,412 1,317,386 1,386,269 279,933 278,034 5,363,480 5,068,563 464,120 (4,402) 73,676 (44,1631 356,976 246,302 (170,554) (166,494) 260,097 34,646 714,217 30,243 (74,860) 839,357 30,243 724,053 693,810 41;3631419 G 724,063 air •85- Comprehenslve Annual Financial Report - i e o~ r - Ei 4 r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS ALL INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 t Working Capital Cash flows from operating activities: Cash received from customers 4 3,918,124 Cash paid to employees for services (622,906) Cash paid to suppliers (3,200,610) rlet cash provided by (used for) operations 94,709 Cash flows from noncaphal financing activities: Transfers out 174,860) _ Net cash provided by (used for) noncapital financing activities (74,860) y Cash flows fr.am capital and related financing activitles: Contributed capital Proceeds from the sale of contractual obligation Interest paid 12,369) w Principal paid on contractual obligation Acquisition of fixed assets (20,3361 Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets 2,044 Net cash provided by fused for) capital related activities (20,880) Cash flows from Investing activities, Proceeds from sale of Investment securities Interest received on investments Purchase of Investment securities Net cash provided by (used for) Investing activities Net Increase In cash and cash equivalents (801) Cash and cash egPivalents October 1 801 Cash end cash equivalents September 30 $ -0. Reconciliation of Internal Service Operating Income to Net Cash Provided by (used 1w) Operating Activities Operating Income (loss) @ 67,269 Adjustments: Depreciation expense 32,916 Ilncreese) decrease in receivables 16,693) (increase) decrease In due from other funds 1187,969) pncreasel decrease In Inventories (124,272) Increase (decrease) In accounts payable 1,869,416 Increase (decrease) in leases payable (13,389) Increase (decrease) In accumulated unpaid compensated absences 1128) increase (decrease) In due to other funds (1,333,642) Total adjustments 37,440 Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities 4 94,709 88 _ Comprehensive Annual Financial Report C 1 r, I, i1 5 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 1 Tolals Year Ended Motor Pool September 30, 1991 September 30, 1990 41,644,012 66,462,136 86,516,361 (622,905) (679,684) 1165,150) 13,366,660) 13,258,329) 1,388,862 1,483,671 1;678,448 (74,860) (74,860) 147,880 147,860 390,000 390,000 1,650,000 (168,195) (170,654) (166,494) 1800,332) (800,332) (505,000) (1,180,320) 11,200,6661 (1,078,786) 71,632 73,076 (44,163) 11,639,3661 (11660,005) (144,442) 8,821,011 8,821,011 366,978 366,976 245,302 (8,633,766) (8,633,766) (2,612,1621 544,222 644,222 (2,266,860) 393,729 392,928 (732,854) 71,263 72,084 804,918 4 464,992 4 464,992 4 72,084 s 396,861 8 454,120 8 14,402) 1,284,450 1,317,366 1,386,269 (42,395) {47,988) 19,210 (139,608) 1327,4771 433,000 (124,272) (266,3111 (110,536) 11558,880 73,427 (13,389) 167,7691 (1261 4,787 _ (1,333,542) 79,247 992,011 1,029,451 1,682,860 4 11388,862 1 1,483,671 8 1,678,448 •87- Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 1, 7 V 3 I N 1 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS - BUDGET AND ACTUAL - (BUDGET BASIS) - WORKING CAPITAL FUND k: FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Working Capital Fund r Valiance- Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) OPERATING REVENUES: Charges for goods and services $4,057,000 43,869,735 9(197,265) Sundry 28,000 261,950 223,960 Total Operating Revenues 4,086,000 4,111,685 26,685 OPERATING EXPENSES: Salaries and wages 627,488 622,904 4,084 Materials and supplies 3,133,115 2,952,638 180,477 Maintenance and repairs 65,970 42,864 13,106 r Miscellaneous 263,831 218,191 46,640 Capital Outlay 9,041 12,096 (3,066) Total Operating Expenses 4,089,446 3,848,693 240,762 Operating Income (4,445) 262,992 267,437 NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES): Interest expense and fiscal charges (2,3591 {2,3591 Total Nonoperattng Revenues (Expenses) (2,369) (2,359) Income Before Operating Transfers (4,446) 260,633 265,078 OPERATING TRANSFERS IN (OUTI (74,880) (74,860) Net income (79,306) 185,773 265,078 RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICIT) - October 1 (Budgetary Basis) 31,586 31,586 RETAINED EARNINGS IDEFICITI • September 30 (Budgetary Basis) {47,7201 217,368 265,078 ENCUMBRANCES AND CAPITAL OUTLAYS w NET OF DEPRECIATION (203,680) (203,680) RETAINED EARNINGS IDEFICITI • September 30 (GAAP Rasls) $ (261,400) $ 13,676 $ 265,078 -Be. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report C R w. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS SUMMARY OF TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 • EXPENDABLE TRUST FUND Employee Insurance - to account for accumulation of resources for the payment of employee Insurance claims and Insurance policies, AGENCY FUNDS Payroll - to account for the collection and payment of the City's payroll and associated liabilities, Defamed Compensetlon - to account for the City employees' investment In a deferred compensation l lan, I .gg. ~Comprehensive Annual Financial Report ~9 G r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET • ALL TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Expendable 'trust ASSET" Fund Cash and deposits 6 317,368 Investments 3,640,003 Receivables: Accrued Interest 41,739 Other 127,326 Due from other funds 123,146 Total Assets 44,149,682 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Accounts payable 4 26,846 Claims payable 702,707 Due to other funds 36 Total Liabilities 729,687 Fund balance 3,419,996 Total Liabilltles and Fund Balance $4,149,662 A i i , 9D Comprehensive Annual Financial Report C C i F" f' it CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Totals Agency Funds September 30, 1991 September 30, 1990 4 4 921,042 81,238,410 4 848,019 3,540,003 2,968,237 41,739 50,571 98,766 226,082 46,334 1,169,335 1,292,481 664,500 82,189,133 $6,338,715 44,677,661 42,096,820 82,123,665 81,303,800 702,707 923,459 92,313 92,348 2,189,133 2,918,720 2,227,259 3,419,995 2,360,402 42,189,133 86,338,716 $4,577,661 A -91. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report ,e Pr`r`{9 L~ -CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS t i; AL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991ES ALL AGENCY FUNDS FOR STATEMENT Balcnce October 1, 1990 PAYROIL FUND ASSETS Cash and deposits 8 Other receivables 9,546 Due from other funds 664,500 Total Assets 674,048 LIABILITIES Accounts payable 4 874,046 Due to other funds Total Liabilities 9 -674,048 r+~ DEFERRED COMPENSATION FUND ASSETS Cash and deposits 4 591,913 Total Assets $ 691;913 LIABILITIES Accounts payable • due to participants $ 591,913 ToIW Uabillties 8 691,913 TOTAL AGENCY FUNDS ASSETS Cash and deposits s 691,913 Other receivables 9,546 Due from other funds 664,500 Total Assets 91;2615,969 LIABILITIES Accounts payable $1,265,969 Due to other funds Total Uabilitias $1,265,969 •92- - Comprehensive Annual Financial Report s x ~a 11 , a I. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Balance Additions Deductions September 30, 1991 S 42,002 $ $ 42,002 89,210 98,768 + 604,836 1,169,336 4838;047 8 611310,093 $578,509 $34,776 $1,217,780 92,313 92,313 4670,822 $34,775 $1,310,093 $318,141 $31,014 $ 879,040 $316,141 $31,014 $ $79,040 $318,141 $31,014 $ 879,040 $310,141 431;014 5`. 879,040 $380,143 $31,014 $ 921,042 89,210 98,756 604,836 1,169, 335 $9540188 8314014 421189,133 , $896,650 $65,789 $2,096,820 92,313 92,313 $988,963 466,789 $2,189,133 93 f Comprehensive Annual Financial Report s n rt h n~ `t i CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS- .94- Comprehensive Annual Finenclel Report SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION 1. w I 1 1 l j I V wt ;r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS GENERAL FUND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION f SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES BUDGET AND ACTUAL ! FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 4 r! i i II! l i I •96• Comprehensive Annual Nnanclal Report 4 f r t. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS CcNERAt FUND -SCHEDULE Of EXPENDITURES BUDGET AND ACTUAL FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Variance- Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) r I GENERAL GOVERNMENT, Administration (0000) Personal Services 8 374,394 4 378,776 6 14,381) Supplies 18,975 19,707 (7321 Maintenance 1,663 11691 (28) ° Services 77,607 76,938 669 i Sundry 12,436 11,173 1,262 484,974 488,284 13,310) Building Operations (0002) Personal Services 218,128 206,694 11,634 Supplies 28,800 22,869 6,931 Maintenance 123,600 82,484 41,016 Services 664,206 674,162 (9,967) 934,633 886,109 48,624 QUEST (0003) 443 } Personal Services 34,144 33,701 Services 278 (278) 34,144 33,979 186 Word Processing (0081) Personal Services 169,921 160,112 (1911 Supplies 16,660 14,868 682 Maintonance 26,026 20,747 6,279 Services 7,412 7,422 00) A 208,909 203,149 6,760 Personnel (0008) Personal Services 367,140 324,260 42,890 Supplies 36,971 32,810 3,381 Maintenance 31200 2,062 1,138 Services 70,211 69,346 866 Sundry 8,320 8,293 27 484,842 436,661 48,281 .96. I C Comprehensive Annual Flnsoclel Report - { Il ~ t a -CiTY OF DENTON, TEXAS GENERAL FUND - SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Variance- Favorable Information Services (0080) Actual (Unfavorabla) Personal Services 6 444,690 S 436,696 8.096 Supplies 36,198 11 Maintenance 38,163 36 86,709 Services 284,073 4,012 31,697 Sundry 1456,899 138,174 10 9 1 Fixed Assets 13,374 (661) 13,926 ,465,064 673,127 191,927 Legal Adminfstratlon (0004) Personal Services 330,388 Supplies 334,902 (4,414) 8,500 9,266 1765) Maintenance 700 Services 27,873 217 f01 Sundry ,7112 2 8,181 4,830 4,747 83 Fixed Assets 11,260 11,806 1646) 383,661 383,172 379 Municipal Court Judge (0005) Personal Services 96,966 Supplies 93,260 31894 11800 1,485 315 Maintenance 400 Services 400 6,6e0, a,672 sob 104,735 99,417 6,318 Municipal Services (0009) " Personat Services 146,470 Supplies 147,960 11,480) 6,297 4,665 632 Maintenance 355 Services 346 , Sundry 14,772 14,913 (141( 392 383 9 167,286 188,268 (980) Library Adminfstration 00701 Personal Services 126,246 Supplies 127,812 (11668) Maintenance 17,066 16,918 148 Services 1,650 1,640 10 54,655 69,695 (4,940) 199,617 204,965 (6,348) 617 t` Comprehensive Annual Flnenclal Report t v. r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS a GENERAL FUND • SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 v r Variance- Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Library Support Services (0072) Personal Services 4 305,140 6 306,116 8 (9761 Maintenance 700 621 79 Services 300 120 160 306,140 306,857 1717) Library Adult Services (0073) Personal Services 226,603 228,861 (2,348) Supplies 4,967 6,131 (164) Maintenance 450 296 165 Services 34,960 33,655 1,305 Fixed Assets 66,000 62,999 3,001 ,jam 322,880 320,931 1,949 Library Children Services (0074) Personal Services 145,780 143,104 2,676 Supplies 1,400 1,376 24 Services 600 476 26 Fixed Assets 28,300 27,459 801 175,980 172,454 3,626 Finance Administration (00201 Personal Services 212,598 208,428 4,170 Supplies 2,134 2,131 3 Maintenance 92 92 Services 23,676 22,714 861 238,399 233,386 6,034 Purchasing (0021) Personal Services 176,634 187,794 (12,180) Supplies 7,880 9,148 (1,266) Maintenance 2,000 1,563 437 Services 21,125 20,789 336 206,639 219,292 (12,663) •98• Comprehensive Annual Financial Report r I ~j ;l ~a _CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS GENERAL FUND - SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES BUDGET AND ACTUAL {CONTINUED} FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Variance- Favorable Budget Actual IUniavorable) Customer Service (0022) Personal Services 8 647,274 8 661,211 8 86,08;; Supplies 142,308 89,205 43,103 Maintenance 4,500 618 3,982 Services 139,170 51,119 88,051 Fixed Assets 14,300 8,879 6,421 ° 947,552 720,932 226,620 Cashiering (0023) Personal Services 202,888 190,207 12,681 Supplies 3,650 3,379 271 Maintenance 300 269 41 Services 16,626 16,954 (3281 Fixed Assets 12,185 11,105 11080 235,649 221,904 13,745 Accounting (0024) Personal Services 418,876 413,308 61568 Supplies 17,625 18,262 (637) Maintenance 776 564 211 Services 13,800 14,204 (404) Fixed Assets 870 868 2 451,946 447,206 4,740 Tax (9026) Personal Services 54,034 r[ t, 197 bd7 Supplies 8,195 796 399 Maintenance 85 52 33 Services 21600 1,672 828 84,814 62,717 2,097 Municipal Court Clerks {00261 Persunal Sorvices 201,322 200,131 994 Supplles 20,363 21,534 (11181) Maintenance 1,182 1,731 (549) Services 7,965 7,730 236 Sundry 31360 1,862 1,508 Flxed Assets 1,300 1,431 11311 235,482 234,609 873 99 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report C, } CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS GENERAL FUND • SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES BUDGET AND ACTUAL (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Variance- Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Finance Administration Misc, (020M) Personal Services 6 25,000 b 9 25,000 Services 110,000 57,008 62,992 Administrative Transfer 81000 81000 Sundry 630,668 533,136 (2,568) 673,668 598,144 76,424 Accounting Misc. (024M) Personal Services 105,800 93,204 12,596 Services 180,000 142,262 37,748 s''r Insurance 567,256 519,986 47,271 Administrative Transfer 180,000 180,000 Sundry 264,000 361,032 (87,0321 1,297,066 1,286,473 10,683 Planning and Development (00151 Personal Services 366,624 356,099 10,426 Supplies 20,820 21,220 (400) Maintenance 350 167 183 Services 16,136 16,862 1726) Administrative Transfer 1,000 11000 Sundry 983 1,726 (743) Fixed Assets 3,186 3066 19 408,998 400,240 8,768 Planning and Development Misc. (015M) Sundry 161,600 161,627 (227) 161,600 161,827 (227) Main Street Program (0016) Personal Services 39,404 39,939 (536) Supplies 1,550 1,513 37 Services 8,782 81900 (118) Sundry 2,928 2,928 Fixed Assets 1,816 1,763 52 54,479 66,043 (5641 Tote/ Genera/ Government 8 9,648,927 4 9,020,023 4628,904 • 100 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report ti x r I~ CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS GENERAL FUND • SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES BUDGET AND ACTUAL (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Variance- Budget Actual Favorable (Unfavorable) PUBLIC WORKS, Engineering 10010) Personal Services $ 914,622 Supplies 8 844,349 0 70,273 29,862 28,926 626 Maintenance 12,130 Services 81606 31626 29,878 30,669 Administrative Transfer (781) Fixed Assets 26,616 (26,616) 688 986,760 603 86 938,460 48,290 Inspection (0014) Personal Services 297,761 Supplies 297,696 86 10,363 10,100 263 Maintenance 18,834 Sundry 16,064 2,780 Fixed Assets 230 b8 174 920 82 838 328,088 323,988 4,100 Transportation Englneerng 100121 Personal Services Supplies 233,232 240,148 12,426 (6,914) Maintenance 10,006 2,420 Services 104,232 98,261 6,971 33,891 22,76 1 11,140 383,780 371,163 12,617 Code Enforcement (00131 Personal Services Supplies 167,938 168,933 8,198 19961 Maintenance 4,762 436 Services 2,100 2,609 8,627 (409) 7,608 1,019 183,863 183,812 61 101 - Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 2 x p r; CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS GENERAL FUND • SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES BUDGET AND ACTUAL (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Variance. Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Airport (0019) Personal Services d 61,668 S 62,889 3 (1,201) Supplfes 4,400 4,220 180 Maintenance 4,785 3,710 1,075 Services 8,130 8,676 (448) Sundry 570 610 60 79,553 79,884 (331) Street Patching 100311 Personal Services 369,734 353,500 6,234 ~'.upplles 37,249 42,443 (6,194) Maintenance 408,266 386,355 22,901 Services 46,698 39,458 6,240 850,937 820,756 30,181 Street Sweeping/Drainage (0810) Personal Services 237,796 219,360 18,436 Supplies 23,874 22,887 987 Maintenance 68,647 65,406 3,241 Services 73,589 67,69E 5,891 Fixed Assets 3,500 2,530 970 407,406 377,861 29,526 Street Constructlon (0033) Personal Services 299,901 280,944 18,957 Supplies 15,292 25,472 (10,180) Maintenance 279,176 235,673 43,502 Services 119,992 105,927 14,085 714,360 648,016 66,344 Street Lighting (0034) Services 373,000 401,847 (28,847) 373,000 401,847 (28,847) Environmental Health Services 10038) Personal Services 119,928 119,502 426 Supplies 4,865 4,230 635 Servfces 11,347 6,616 4,731 136,140 130,348 6,792 C • 102. C Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 8 v. i~ i Y CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS GENERAL FUND • SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES BUDGET AND ACTUAL (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Variance. Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Animal Control (0039) Personal Services t 177,141 S 178,368 t 772 Supplies 23,575 19,929 3,648 Maintenance 14,737 Services 12,320 2,417 28,630 24,849 3,781 244,083 233,487 10,816 Total Pwo works t 4,887;960 t 4,609,822. ij 178,38'i A • 103 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report r. 1 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS GENERAL FUND • SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Variance- Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) PARRS & RECREATION; Parks & Recreation Administration (0060) Personal Services 8 169,884 8 169,923 8 (39) Supplies 32,580 34,115 {1,536} Maintenance 11500 742 768 Services 29,406 30,503 (1,097) Sundry 300 434 (134) Fixed Assets 414 383 31~ 234,084 236,100 (2,016) Recreation (0062) Personal Services 680,772 682,514 11,742) Supplies 61,727 59,238 2,489 Maintenance 81860 8,619 231 Services 219,969 215,179 4,790 Interfund Transfer 2,400 2,400 Sundry 566 566 Fixed Assets 17,096 12,676 4,619 991,379 978,692 12,687 Park Maintenance (0063) Personal Services 787,326 768,736 18,591 Supplies 72,360 66,786 5,564 Maintenance 101,681 106,388 (3,7071 Services 106,026 97,917 8,109 a Sundry 150 150 1,067,533 1,038,826 28,707 Total Parks & Recreation 8 2,292,996 S 20263,618 8 39,378 104 a C Comprehensive Annual Financial Report ti. r I . f.' Sls[ru t r 4'! CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS GENERAL FUND - SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES • BUDGET AND ACTUAL (CONTINUED) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Variance- Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) rueuc safern Pollce 10040) Personal Services @ 4,911,646 4 4,921,602 4 19,967) Supplies 207,747 196,219 11,628 + Maintenance 150,978 164,721 (13,7431 Services 448,929 461,944 (13,015) Administrative Transfer 26,468 26,456 Sundry 600 11123 (523) Fixed Assets 20,157 13,077 7,080 6,766,512 6,786,142 118,630) Fire Administration 10050) Personal Services 371,139 360,882 10,257 Supplies 26,683 26,427 (744) Maintenance 25,917 26,572 (665) Services 121,562 103,418 18,144 Sundry 700 651 49 Fixed Assets 6,841 61680 161 561,842 524,630 27,212 Fire Operations (00611 Personal Services 3,019,508 3,169,205 (149,697) Supplies 70,200 66,200 4,000 Maintenance 49,900 86,639 (16,639) Services 142,348 142,051 297 , 1,281,966 3,443,996 (162,039) Fire Prevention (0062) Personal Services 176,160 156,726 20,434 Supplies 4,900 4,674 226 Maintenance 51000 1,981 31019 Services 17,029 11,898 5,131 203,089 174,279 28,810 C 105- Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 3, 4 r ~ Uyr CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS GENERAL FUND - SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES BUDGET AND ACTUAL (CONTINUED) M FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Varlance- Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Emergency Medical Services (0063) Personal Services 4 676,373 S 660,816 4 16,867 Supplies 89,666 69,304 262 Maintenance 24,662 16,497 w 8,166 Services 146,468 137,962 81618 907,069 874,268 32,790 Emergency Management (0064) Personal Services 62,331 49,286 3,066 Supplies 6,213 3,840 1,373 Maintenance 1,310 1,172 138 Services 13,033 12,822 211 Flxed Assets 180 179 1 72,067 67,279 4,788 Total P"wo Safety 410,782,626 410,869,894 4 {971089) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL FUND 427,412,408 426,662,867 4769,661 •106• i C Comprehensive Annual Financlal Report 8 t I I STATISTICAL SECTION E i i i i i i Ir 1 ...:r~x•,SA II b f 3-40 STATISTICAL SECTION A C 107- i 1 r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i r. GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES r BY FUNCTION (1) LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS f Fiscal General Public Public Year Government Safety Weeks ' 1982 $ 4,348,188 $ 4,805,245 $ 1,208,589 1983 4,170,991 6,020,468 2,180,879 1984 4,673,090 6,531,882 2,785,622 1985 6,191,869 6,363,330 3,071,489 1986 6,601,963 7,166,369 3,690,350 i, 1987 7,498,530 7,742,987 3,630,471 1988 8,468,435 8,318,904 4,040,489 1989 10,842,100 9,150,314 4,367,287 1990 10,470,382 10,184,816 4,228,457 1991 9,867,669 10,982,759 4,612,406 r< t, 111 Includes General, Special Revenue, and Debt Service Funds 121 1982 Capital Outlay also included In Departmental Totals 131 Difference due to advance refunding of General Obligations bonds and Certificates of Obligation in November, 1986. a 1108. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report s, = rte+r.e_,.,, f Y CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS _ Table 1 Parks and Debt Recreation Other Capltai Outlay (2) Service Total $1,137,967 9352,673 8 266,346 F1,882,987 913,735,839 1,257,726 513,377 1,746,561 14,889,992 1,498,226 385,783 2,392,868 17,267,461 a 1,719,742 11016,119 2,419,628 20,782,077 2,110,862 1,044,401 167,146(3) 20,661,081 2,262,215 390,369 3,663,923 25,178,485 2,306,063 446,593 4,164,783 27,747,257 2,397,948 403,633 5,508,631 32,669,813 2,846,692 574,721 4,586,442 32,690,610 2,648,067 234,782 4,819,773 33,165,446 •105- C~ r,lve Annual Flnenclal „ayort (y i l ei CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS GENERAL REVENUES BY SOURCE (1) LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Lice lses Utllity Inter Fiscal and Franchise Governmental Year Taxes Permits Fees Revenue _ 1982 $ 7,695,670 8 98,943 $330,694 $ 986,405 1983 8,819,953 213,490 367,937 1,036,903 1984 10,406,911 303,725 418,680 826,676 1986 11,845,499 356,661 484,171 1,270,019 1986 13,83810 i3 379,238 377,960 1,791,435 1987 16,866,362 280,171 426,319 1,123,194 1988 17,394,836 211,999 650,879 1,179,092 1989 18,674,210 222,766 695,142 1,681,446 1990 18,998,832 261,080 577,188 1,480,669 1991 16,756,479 243,070 614,940 1,264,634 11) Includes General, Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds • 110 i i_ - Comprehensive Annual Financial Report _ x CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Table 2 Fees for Fines and Interest Miscellaneous Services Forfeitures Revenue Revenue Total 8 186,716 6 397,610 6163,436 8 366,067 610,411,349 246,808 661,214 110,189 469,270 11,924,784 494,212 616,826 192,196 642,462 13,860,677 1068,673 716,044 330,026 272,088 16,442,181 1,060,070 669,194 246,666 836,803 19,178,268 1,128,764 780,748 347,416 918,666 20,870,629 1,312, 662 1,144, 911 600,178 11006,108 23,600,886 1,298,206 1,232,766 608,280 2,073,460 28,486,266 1,297, 881 1,267, 661 748,200 1,486 :8 2$,106,107 1,287,836 986,632 643,722 996,263 26,772,466 i - 111 - Comprehanaive Annuel Finenclal Report i ~.M1 q* C h r11 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS e PROPERTY TAX LEWES AND COLLECTIONS LAST TEN FIQr%AL YEARS 9 F(soal Total Current Tax Percent of Levy Delinquent Tax Year Tax Levy Collections Collection Colleotlons 1982 14,930,971 14,746,613 98,28% 1137,078 1983 5,376,210 5,122,101 95.27 148,747 1984 61996,965 (1) 6,786,881 96,61 166,763 1986 6,808,814 (1I 6,625,734 97.31 167,360 1986 8,516,906 (1) 8,164,114 95.88 228,806 1987 10,801,306 (1) 10,474,616 96.97 303,849 1988 12,192,485 (1) 11,741,034 96.30 313,375 1989 12,646,346 (1) 12,281,164 97,11 441,851 1990 13,167,415 (1) 12,719,236 96,60 336,907 1991 13,718,332 (1) 13,343,006 97,26 203,867 (1) Dantc n Central Appraisal D(strict P 112 . Comprehensive Annual Flnanclsl Report i RPM CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Table 3 Outstanding Total Collections as Delinquent Taxes Total Tax a Percent of Outstanding as a Percent of Collection Current Levy Delinquent Taxes Current Levy 04,883,691 99,94% 4 723,596 14,8796 6,270,848 98,04 1,066,234 19,81 6,953,644 99,29 1,269,189 21.17 6,793,094 99.77 1,369,577 19,97 8,392,920 98.54 11019,080 11,97 10,778,165 99.79 1,042,749 9.66 12,054,409 98.87 1,064,131 6.73 12,723,015 100.61 1,133,897 8.97 13,066,143 99,15 1,276,664 9,69 13,546,892 98.76 11810,683 11,74 C - 113 - - Comprehensive Annual Financial Report j y 7 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS t ASSESSED AND ESTIMATED ACTUAL VALUE OF TAXABLE PROPERTY LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS 4 Real Property Personal Property Fiscal Assessed Estimated Actual Assessed Estimated Actual Year Value Value Value Value 1982 6 450,732,269 $ 460,732,259 4212,704,829 42!2,704,829 1983 (1) 831,397,479 831,397,479 218,549,070 218,549,070 1984 (1! 901,334,606 901,334,606 226,262,045 226,252,046 19850) 919,943,824 919,943,824 234,092,434 234,092,434 1986 (1) 1,176,422,667 1,176,422,567 267,120,891 267,120,891 1987 (1) 1,621,636,234 1,521,636,234 298,827,706 298,827,706 1988 (1) 1,758,860,855 1,768,860,855 291,433,722 291,433,722 19890) 1,833,449,786 1,833,449,786 304,911,159 304,911,159 1990 (1) 1,776,614,696 1,776,614,695 362,386,866 362,386,868 1991 (1) 1,738,498,296 1,736,496,296 3U0,106,990 300,106,990 (1) Denton Central Appralsal District 1. -114- Comprehensive Annual Flnsnclal Report x h I CITY OF DENI ON, TEXAS - Table 4 Total Ratio of Total Estimated Actual Assessed to Total Assessed Value Value Estimated Actual o 6 663,437,088 8 663,437,088 100% 1,049,946,649 1,049,946,549 100% 1,127,586,551 1,127,586,651 100% y✓ 1,154,036,258 1,154,036, 258 100% 1,443,643,468 1,443,543,468 10096 1,820,463,940 1,820,463, 940 100% 2,050,294,577 2,060,294,577 100% 2,138,360,946 2,138,360,946 100% 2,139,001,681 2,139,001, 661 100% 2,036,603,285 2,036,603,286 100% - 115- Comprehensive Annual Financial Report C <t rr y C CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Table b PROPERTY TAX RATES AND TAX LEVIES DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS TAX RATES (Per 9100 of Assessed Valustlonl Fiscal School Year City District County State Total 1982 0.7740 1.220 •2370 ,00 2.2310 toss 0.6100 0,730 1886 .00 1,4086 1984 016800 0.810 2120 .00 1.5820 1985 0,6900 0.880 ,2116 .00 1.8818 1986 0.5900 01860 •1760 .00 1.6160 1987 0.6000 0.790 •2308 .00 116109 1988 0.5928 0.770 ,2264 •00 1.6882 logo 0,6828 0.830 .2269 .00 1.6487 1990 0,6183 1.086 ,2410 •00 1.9243 1991 0.6561 1.228 .2647 1130 2.1478 The tax rote decreased In (local year 1982 pursuant to an increase In *$messed valuation from 60% to 100% of estimated actual value of all taxable property, TAX LEVIES Fiscal School Year City District County Slate Total 1982 6 4,930,971 8 8,736,614 S 6,846,888 6 920,614,173 ' 1983 6,376,210 6,847,268 9,012,748 23,238,216 1984 6,985,966 9,938,768 91080,168 26,012,901 less 6,808,814 11,833,437 10,209,084 28,851,315 1988 8,516,906 14,290,090 11,164,643 33,971,629 1987 10,801,306 16,619,326 19,414,002 46,834,833 1888 12,192,486 18,284,787 21,497,470 61,974,762 1989 12,648,346 20,609,393 22,846,164 66,100,893 1990 13,107,415 26,907,760 24,814,386 63,889,661 1991 13,718,332 28,076,876 27,913,048 89,708,258 SOURCEr Denton Cantrb. Appraisal District - 110 • f, . Comprehensive Annual Financial Report ti sr. ;;I faAi htsp 'S ]yJt CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Table (I SPECIAL ASSESSMENT COLLECTIONS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Total Delinquent Outstanding Current Current Ratio of Assessments Current and Fiscal Assessment Assessments collections 10 Collections Delinquent Year Due Collected Amount Due Adlustments Assessments 1982 $ $ 8 7,490 $137,899 1983 600 137,399 1984 649,992 307,006 66.8% 6,137 376,249 1986 ' 98,020 278,229 1986 279,229 1987 1988 279,229 90,711 188,818 f989 ' 1,766 186,783 1990 97,038 89,717 1991 48,246 41,471 117- t t~ Comprehensive Annual Financial Report b Y, {I r~ CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS RATIO OF NET GENERAL BONDED DEBT TO ASSESSED VALUE AND NET BONDED DEBT PER CAPITA LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Fiscal Assessed Value Gross Year Population (In thousands) bonded Debt(2) 1982 50,322 4 663,437 (1) $14,247,000 ; 1983 63,383 1,049,947 16,817,500 1984 57,703 1,127,687 16,552,760 1985 61,237 1,164,036 22,480,000 1986 64,480 1,443,643 22,066,869 1987 65,191 1,820,464 26,386,060 1988 65,623 2,060,296 28,764,769 1989 66,011 2,138,361 30,770,309 1990 66,270 2,139,002 30,933,509 1991 66,470 2,036,603 28,131,359 0) Assessed value increased due to an increase in assessed valuation from 60% to 100% of estimated actual value of taxable property (2) Excludes general obligation bonds pledged by sanitation revenues a • 1990 Census • • Estimate as of January,1991 c 118 - - Comprehensive Annual Financial Report r. f r I CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Table 7 Less Debt Service Ratio of Net a Bonded Debtto Funds Net Bonded Debt Net Bonded Debt Assessed J,je Per Capita 5 30,831 614,218,169 r 2.14 34,049 18,783,451 1.60 1283 314 91,266 16,481,486 1137 268 605,541 21,8 74,469 1.90 1,247,326 367 20,818,633 1.44 323 1,895,340 24,670,720 1.36 1,912,928 378 26,861,831 1.31 409 1,132,060 29,838,249 1.39 449 722,476 30,211,033 1.41 309,628 49 27,821,833 1.37 419 1 • 119 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report l' r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Table 8 COMPUTATION OF LEGAL DEBT MARGIN SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Net Assessed Value $2,036,603,286 4r Plus Exempt Property Total 77,778,321 Total Assessed Value $2,114,381,608 Debt Llmit - No debt limit Is mandated by law but the City does recognize six percent as an economic limitation $ 126,662,896 Amount of debt applicable to debt limit - Total general obligation bonded debt $24,666,730 Less general obligation bonds pledged by sanitation revenues (1,066,371) Certificates of obligation 4,620,000 28,131,369 Less • Amount In debt service fund available for payment of principal 309,626 a Total Amount of Debt Applicable to Debt Limit 27,821,833 Legal Debt Margin $ 99,041,063 CF iw •120• Comprehensive Annual Financial Report i ..1 r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 't+ Table 9 COMPUTATION OF DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING DFBT SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Percentage Amount Net Debt Applicable to the Applicable to Jurisdiction Outstanding City of Denton (1) City of Denton City of Denton $29,186,730 100.0% 829,186,730 ' Denton Independent School District 43,110,000 84.0 36,212,400 Denton County 7,164,622 21.4 1,631,089 Total 866,930,219 it) The 'Percentage Applicable to the City of Denton" Is based on the relative assessed values within the City of Denton, •121• Comprohenalve Annual Finenciel Repoli 1 t 'i CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Table 10 RATIO OF ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES FOR GENERAL BONDED DEBT TO TOTAL GENERAL EXPENDITURES (1) LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS r Ratio of Debt Service Fiscal Interest and Total Expenditures Year principal Fiscal Charges Total Debt Service Expenditures (percent) 1882 01,123,750 It 769,237 0 1,882,987 513,736,838 13.71% 1983 1,047,760 6881811 1,746,681 14,888,992 11.73 1984 1,264,750 1,126,108 2,392,858 17,267,461 13,80 1116 1,417,386 1,002,143 2,419,528 20,762,077 11,64 1986 136,438 21,708 167,148(2) 20,661,081 0.76 1987 860,900 2,603,923 3,663,923 25,178,486 14.66 1888 2,140,773 2,024,010 4,184,783 27,747,257 16,01 1889 3,314,167 2,194,464 6,508,631 32,668,613 16,86 1990 2,263,091 2,323,349 4,686,440 32,880,608 14,03 1891 2,714,668 2,105,106 4,819,773 33,068,044 14.58 11) Includes General, Speclal Revenue and Debt Service (2) Debt Service variance due to 1986 refunding of debt w - 122. t Comprehensive Annual Finnnclef Report `w x 7 v I . r.j f ~i F~ CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS f~ L LD) opp~ a .123• Comprehensive Annuul Flnenclel Report C„ S Il CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS REVENUE BOND DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS ? Net Revenue Fiscal Operating Direst Operatln Year _ Revenue Expenses Iii Available for Debt Utility System Service 1982 637,668,916 830,729,686 8 8,80„9,230 1983 41,376,356 33,236,869 8,1'.19,687 1984 55,639,035 39,765,633 115,873,402 1986 67,541,640 62,104,689 16,047,051 1986 73,507,978 58,911,014 14,698,964 1987 73,120,971 69,829,407 13,281,864 1988 73,383,668 61,203,168 12,11M,398 1989 77,366,137 80,247,323 17,117,814 1990 78,124,699 66,669,160 21,565,439 1981 80,469,479 66,731,212 23,738,247 (1) Excluding Depreciation C C 124 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 4 v. v CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Table 11 Debt Service Requirements • Principal Interest Total Coverage $1,298,459 $1,642,163 $2,640,612 2,41 11640,000 1,073,631 2,613,531 3.11 2,060,000 2,336,712 4,396,712 3.61 1,735,000 3,909,606 6,635,606 2.74 2,046,000 3,880,181 5,926,181 2.46 2,020,000 3,462,639 6,482,539 2,42 2,116,000 3,338,428 5,463,428 2,23 2,260,000 3,388,817 5,638,817 3.04 2,430,000 4,274,233 6,704,233 3.11 2,900,000 4,645,866 7,446,656 3.19 e 126 - Comprehensive Annual Flnenclal Report r K 's CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 1 r PROPERTY VALUE, CONSTRUCTION AND BANK DEPOSITS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Commercial Construction 111 Fiscal Property Value Number Year tin thousands) of Units Value 210 $11,846,452 1982 $ 863,437 1983 1,049,946 221 74,777,113 1984 1,127,587 291 81,264,078 1985 1,164,036 645 88,768,781 1986 1,443,643 460 41,452,104 1987 1,820,464 227 46,619,496 1988 2,060,295 113 21,927,481 1989 2,138,361 160 31,376,613 1990 2,139,002 134 6,427,910 1991 2,043,852 70 6,149, 572 111 City of Denton Planning and Development Department Estimate (2) City of Denton Chamber of Commerce Estimate C • 126 - Compfehenslve Annuat Financial Report 1 s i'. l CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Table 12 Resldentlal Construction (1) Bank (2) Number Deposits y of Units Value (In thousands) 983 426,214,973 $288,979 233 26,366,660 388,005 564 49,273,898 386,000 618 49,995,190 475,179 673 54,972,729 581,819 457 33,417,130 467,504 304 24,577,039 448,058 268 21,241,087 642,486 318 20,249,571 714,892 187 12,414,469 665,630 • 127 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report C C C~ ti x k ,•'Yay CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS • 128 q Compfehendve Annua} Flnenclal Report < 'a i CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Table 13 PRINCIPAL TAXPAYERS SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Percentage of Total Taxable Taxable Assessed Assessed Name of Taxpayer Kind of Property Valuation • _ Valuation Peterbllt/Paccer Diesel Trucks 869,607,866 2,84% General 't'elephone Telephone Utility 41,027,744 1,86% Texas Instruments Electronic 38,297,872 1.83% Manufacturing Tetra Pak Packing Manufacturing 36,726,866 1.76% Andrew Corporation Electronic Equipm„nt 32,714,180 1,6896 Victor Equipment Welding Equipment 20,439,303 0.98% NotamirLifemark/AMI Hospital and 17,113,483 0.82% Professional Buitding Acme Brick Company Brick Manufacturing 16,022,143 0,72% Golden Triangle Mall Shopping Mall 13,948,098 0,87% Denton Center Joint Venture Shopping Center 13,440,197 0.84% 8288,236,760 13.77% ' Source; Denton Central Appraisal District Reported Property Value, 1990 •129- Comprehensive Annual rlnenclal Report r~ . K CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i 1 f SCHEDULE OF INSURANCE IN FORCE SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 The City of Denton Is largely self-Insured, This includes but Is not limited to the first $50,000 of each ' property loss and $10,000 of each vehicle loss. However, liability policies are purchased for airport, paramedic/EMT, recreation program and employee dishonesty exposures. Exposures that are not retained by the City are covered by various Insurance companies including; Expiration Insurance Company Premium Policy No, Date 1. Arkwright $ 47,140 390695 10/01/92 2. Arkwright 111,697 290609 10/01192 3. U.S.A.1.G. 4,500 AL01459 10/01/92 (Willis Corrcon Aerospace) 4. Texas Political Subdivision of Paid HO 165 10/01/92 (Employer's Casualty Ca) Loss/Contribution 5. Western World Insurance Company 6,778 GLA318087 01/31/92 6. Appalachian Insurance Company 250 YA242 11101192 7, Western Heritage Insurance Company 3,795 RTPN.103.911.2011 10/01/92 8. Western Heritage Insurance Company 1,612 CLP-0107461 09/07/92 Y • 130 ComprO )nsive Annual Financial Report 4 n CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS_. h Table 18 Education Level in Public School Unemployment School Years (1) Enrollment (2) Pate (3) 16'8 8,386 • 6,896 16.8 8,481 6.8 16.8 8,9r4 3.6 16.8 91618 7,6 16.8 91919 6,2 16.8 91899 8,4 16.8 10,180 6.2 16.8 10,276 7.6 16.6 10,696 6.4 16.8 10,960 7.6 133 Comprehensive Annual F)nanclal Report C L14' ..1 ~J1 , J }a ~r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS_ } Table 16 MISCELLANEOUS STATISTICAL DATA SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 Form of Government Council-Manager Area 61.0 square miles Date of Incorporation September 26, 1886 Miles of Streets 300 Number of Street Lights 4,624 'i Fire Protection: Number of stations 6 Number of firemen and officers (exclusive of volunteer firemen) 96 Police Protection: Number of stations 1 Number of policemen and officers 104 Municipal Electric Department: Number of customers 27,114 Annual electric production 820,286,910 KWH Average monthly consumption 68,367,242 KWH Mlles of electric line 397,8 miles Municipal Water Department; Number of customers 17,626 Annual water production 4,287,196,000 gallons Average monthly consumption 3F,7,266,000 gallons Miles of water main 296 miles Municipal Wastewater Department: Number of customers 16,698 Miles of sanitary sewer 330 miles Annual wastewater discharge 3,162,870,000 gallons/year Building Permits Issued 486 e Recreation and Culture: Number of parka 16 with 642 acres Number of libraries 1 Items in circulation 134,967 Emp;oyees (All Funds): Exempt 146 Nonexempt M Total 918 -134- Comprehensive Annual Financial Report c 4 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 1 i E DEMOGRAPHIC STATISTICS f LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Per Capita } Fiscal Year Population (1) Income (1) Average Ape 1982 60,322 $7500 , 26.3 ; 1983 63,383 7,800 26,6 1984 67,703 6,040 26,8 1985 61,237 8,E15 28,2 1986 64,480 9,746 27,4 1987 65,191 9,750 27,6 1988 65,623 9,760 27,6 1989 66,011 9,760 28.2 I 1990 66,270 • 9,750 30.7 1991 66,470 0 • 9,750 30,7 f (1) Planning and Community Development Department's Estimate 12) Denton Independent School District Estimate , (3) Texas Employment Commisslon Estimate ' 1990 Census ' • Estimate as of January, 1991 132 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 1, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS " z~ s 1 I Table 14 Amount of Coverage limit ; 1, Boller and Mach[nery $73,690,000 2. All Risk Coverage 60,161,100 3. Airport and Hanger Keepers Liability 6,000,000 4. Workmen's Compensetlon $elf•insured 6. Ambulance- Prof esslonal Liability 500,000 6. Transportatlon 100,000 7. Recreation Center - Medical 10,000 8 Recreation After School Program • Canis 1,000,000 131 - Comprehenmive Annual Financial Report - - ~d