HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-24-1992
Agenda No.
Agenda llom~_._
AGENDA Dale ~ , ~
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
March 24, :1992
Special Ca11 Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
215 E,24, 1992 at 5115 p,m, in the Civil Defense Room of City Nall,
McKinney, Penton, Texas at which the followittg ~.tems will be
considered:
5:15 p.m.
1 • Receive a report and hold a discussion with the Parks and
Recreation Board and the '91 Committee regarding
implementation of the 1986 bond program,
2• Receive a report from the Righway Department regarding litter
and sweeping activities on the I35E right-of-way.
3. Receive a report and hold a dl.scussian regarding the Storm
water Uiility,
4, Consider approval of a resolution authorizing tide Mayor to
sign a petition requesting a Certificate of Interim use from
the Interstate Commeroe commission for Unian Paaifia right-of-
way,
Miscellaneous matters from the Cit
y Manager,
6, New Business
This item provides a section Por Counoil Members to su
items for future agendas. ggest
7, Executive Session;
A• Legal Matters Under Sec, 2(e), Art, 6252-17 V,A,T.S,
B• heal Estate Under Sea. 2 f
( Art. 6252•-17 V,A.T,S,
C, Personnel/Board Appointments
652-1'f V.A.T,S. Under Sea. 2(g), Art.
1. Consider appointments to the Building Code Board,
the Electrical Code Board, the Sign Board pf
Appeals, the Historic Landmark commission, and the
Planning and zoning commission.
2, Consider an appointment of an Assistant City Fudge
for the Municipal Court.
t
1)
1
Agondi} No. ~R V I D
Agenda Item Lille J
3, Consult with the city Manager, City Attorney and
Municipal Judge regarding goals and objectives for
1992 for Municipal Court.
7. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
C E R T I F I C A T E
1 certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on
the day of , 1992 at o'clock (a.m.)
CITY SECRETARY
NOTES THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IS ACCESSIBLE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. THE
CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE
HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN
ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY
SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 566-8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS
DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX SO
THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH
THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE.
ACC00053
it
CITY
,~COVNCJJ
L~
0 ~o~0
0~Cw
% .°o
QQ 'ti r r aV
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Agon& No. Agenda Ilem~
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council C1alo _ ~ y' _4°~'
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager L /
SUBJECT: Implementation of 1986 Bond Funds for
Parks and Recreation Facilities
RECOMMENDATION: In older to minimize operation and maintenance costs and
maximize revenues and services, the Park Board recommends the $2.7 million
remaining from 1986 bond funds be used for an alternative recreation
development as outlined in the attached proposal.
SUFRWY: With City Council approval, the Park Board plans to have four
public meetings and two Council public hearings to receive citizen input on
implementation of the 1986 bond funds.
BACKGROUND: The bond funds were originally to be used to build a northeast
and southeast recreation center. Because of the delay in selling these bonds
due to the slow economy, the bond funds authorized would only be sufficient
to construct centers of approximately half the size originally planned. In
addition, the high operation and maintenance costs associated with centers
make the implementation of the original proposal impractical because of
budgetary constraints. The Park Board met with the 91 Committee in 1991 to
poll them as to a shift in implementation of the bond program. At that time,
there was a consensus between the 91 Committee and the Park Board to consider
other options. Staff has been exploring those possibilities and has
discussed them with the Park Board. The Park Board has agreed on a primary
and secondary option to recommend to Council, and these specific alternatives
will be discussed with the 91 committee Monday evening.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
FISCAD IUACT:
RESP FULLY SUBMITTED:
Li d V. Harrell
City Manager
Prep red b
Name t Brinkman
Title Director of Parks and Recreation
Approvedr Name Title Executive Director for
Municipal Services/Economic Development
Fi
Pyonda No. ~ x/02 '0 /0
Agenda 11cm._
X16 3 - R
P 7
CITY or omrm, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E, MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201
M E M O R A N D U M
TO. Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation
DATE: March 19, 1992
SUBJECT: Implementation of 1986 Bond Funds
In 1986, Denton voters approved the expenditure of $5.95 million
for the development of athletic fields, three neighborhood
centers, and expansion of the Senior Center. All of the
facilities have been constructed with the exception of two
neighborhood recreation centers. The remaining funds ($2.7
million) are now available to complete the implementation of the
1986 Bond Program for Parks and Recreation.
The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has made a decisive
judgement call that it would not reflect sound management
practices to build the two neighborhood centers as approved in
1986. It was the consensus of the Park Board that in the current
economic climate it is not prudent to consider opening two new
centers when the City has been experiencing budget cutbacks which
have forced our current facilities to operate with minimal
staffing, inadequate equipment and supplies, and reduced operating
hours. In addition, due to inflation, the value of the bond money
has declined since 1986, Therefore, it is estimated that if two
new park sites should be purchased for the center locations, the
remaining available funds would construct centers only half the
size of what was originally proposed.
The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has also adopted the
position that all new facilities will be built to the quality
standard of the Martin Luther King, Jr. Center and be maintained
at a proper level. Current, as well as past Board Members have
consistently maintained concerns about curtailing center hours,
inadequate funding for equipment and supplies as well as staff,
and the City's inability to provide adequate funding levels for
maintenance. For example, the Senior Center and Martin Luther
King, Jr. Center were never completely funded for equipment and
furnishings. Therefore, the Board feels it is crucial to spend
the current funds in the most efficient manner possible so new
facilities do not further drain operation and maintenance budgets.
81715668100 DIFW METRO 434.2529
FS
Agenda fJo,_ /OC yUILI
Agenda Item_
Implementation of 1986 Bond Funds tble _ 3 "0? ~
Page - 2 3 Al 7
It was on this basis that the Parks and Recreation Advisory Foard
considered other options for implementing the $2.7 million for
recreational facilities.
With the Board's and staff direction, Hatfield Crookless
Architects, Inc. developed six possible options for the bond
money. These options are outlined in Attachment I, "Summary of
Options", which will be reviewed at your meeting on March 24,
3,992. After weeks of deliberation, the Board recommends the
following:
Option 6 - In cooperation with the Denton Independent
School District, construct an indoor/outdoor
pool and expand North Lakes Recreation center
(approximately 40,000 sq.ft. total).
Option 4 - If DISD does not participate in building a
pool, expand North Lakes Recreation to a
comprehensive Community Center (approximately
30,000 sq.ft. total).
As with all bond funds, it is always possible simply not to expend
the money on capital projects and instead use the funds to pay off
outstanding bond indebtedness,
It Is the opinion of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board that
Option 6 (DISD participation in a natatorium) represents the most
beneficial and economically feasible alternative at this time.
Their full recommendation will be presented in detail at the
council meeting.
Budget and program summaries and conceptual floor plans are
included on the two recommended options (6 and 4), as well as
option 1 which is the original approved bond program (see
Attachment II). A comparison detailing the estimated impact to
the operating budget between the various options is also included
(Attachment III).
OPTXON 6
A City of Denton/DISD partnership provides the following benefitsa
• DISD participates in one-half of the construction cost of
the natatorium ($1 million) and in turn is allowed to use
the pool under the terms of a joint use agreement.
is
Implementation of 1986 Bond Funds Age ndatlo.
Page - 3
Agenda It6jr, 41
7
• A 20,000 square foot indoor/outdoor pool facility would
include a warm water recreation pool which can be used
for therapeutic programming, spa, flume slide, an outdoor
deck and sunbathing area, and adequate room for locker
rooms and bleachers.
• Provides a competition size indoor/outdoor pool which
would draw year-round revenue to the center, allows for
therapeutic and fitness programming, and provide
facilities for DISD swim team.
• DISD participation leverages the City's bond funds to
create a facility which accommodates a broad range of
recreational services.
• Expands the existing North Lakes Recreation center itself
to 20,000 sq.ft. and would include a new gymnasium, men,'s
and women's locker rooms, fitness room, meeting rooms,
multi-purpose rooms, and creates a youth area to
accommodate the recreational needs of young children and
teenagers.
• Generates a greater amount of revenue than any other
option and in turn has the least impact on the operating
budget (see Attachment III).
• Represents a cooperative effort of two taxing agencies to
maximize a quality facility to taxpayers while
efficiently managing tax dollars.
OPTION 4
in the event option 6 does not meet with citizen, DISD Board, or
city council approval, or if the DISD bond package is not approved
by voters, Option 4 is recommended as the next best alternative
solution. The following is a brief summary of option 4 benefits:
4 Expands the existing North Lakes Recreation Center to
30,000 square feet.
• New facilities developed will include a full size gym,
locker rooms, multipurpose room, meeting rooms, youth
center, fitness expansion, racquetball courts, and
kitchen.
• Revenue will be enhanced due to racquetball courts and
additional programming areas.
• operation maintenance costs are contained as a result of
existing facility and staff.
4 This facility would serve a broader range of recreational
needs than a smaller neighborhood center.
{
Implementation of Bond Funds AgendaNo..
Page - 4 Auende Item
0alo 3' 9i
1/7
In order to solicit citizen response to this alternative use of
bond funds, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has
recommended the fallowing process:
• Four neighborhood meetings will be held to present the
three options and receive public input.
• Park Hoard makes final recommendation to City council
based on feedback from neighborhood meetings.
• Two City council public hearings will be held to
determine support for options.
• DISD Board is bri0fed throughout the process.
• City council considers resolution regarding
implementation of bond funds.
The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board respectfully requests your
oonsideration of these options and will be present to respond to
any questions at the meeting,
i
Tevfe qrn ma n
Attachment T Summary of Options
Attachment II - B
6e 4, udget and Program Summaries for Options
Attachment III - Budget a Impact and Cost Comparison of
Attachment IV - Memo~ne lssues Rand I
elated to Community Center
options
Attachment V -
Minutes from Park Board meeting on
February 24, 1992
Minutes from Park Board Meeting on
AJJ002AC March 10, 1992
Planning Options
City of Donlon summary of opt t,6 9 -o-/d
D00"Tlent of Parks and Rtecreatlon Agenda Item 4-1-
Option Option 'I . Two New District Centers _ rata gz
V District District -
Center I Center
A B.
1 1,150,000 1 1,
w 160,000
r~I Pm 1; 5boRc s r±~~;Y of i6f9,Sao sP = $2,700,000
rJ.w Pv412~00cro0ss New PaNi 10000 s
New 04M Cost!-Ali 1 I5p 000 Now 04M Coil ' 'i 1 I ~p~000
New Revenue A4) 10,000 New R.Ye M0:1 10,000
Option 2 - Expand Two Existing Centers
Npr#h Exp. p5g Dw"' Expq
040 ,1
Lakes WGd 15pa./ f=PcrF a48espaee + ~efv j
SI, I 0 00 of ea 91,467 sF g ow a 91 457 Sr L
New O1M Coslsi 1000 $l, 10,000 New ~dA~ Cos~u 177610001 15L0 doo
ew ROYN UN 90, w 0YONSI 9O 006
Exist, Ana 11 404 SF Pork Exist. Ana 11,404 SP $2,700,000
Edit Porklnp 109 Spaces EMI. Porkhq 00 $pan
Option 3 . New District Center (New site) r -
N~1ew 1
North 000 Add., 1 CAntct
Now rea 1,344 IF DPr1ia New b~ a01 344 SF I Contor
Lakes Now akktp777ggSpoC~ Newggoarkhq7ggSpaces w 12'00p02'pOp~J,t({,
~nacas
$1 1000 Told10'o' ~nql?11645poca Ron '000 T001dr°&' 1 745pa « e.~wy Par F
Exif}, Ana lI 404 SF Eylet~ Area 11 141 SF 'vVrAg` 46yp
Re $2,700,000
Exist, , Porkkp (D9 Span Exiel, PoWng CO Spaan New OUA Costs W WO
Option 4 - North Lakes corlmuN Center Now Revax»i 190,000
ty Expansion (For Reaeatlon)
Commu Ity,
North Center
E Uir, f"10
Lakes xponsl n
52 fork
,000, 00 land
• 7N 1500,000
Re ,000 Niw P 90
Spac
0 $2,700,000
Exist, oOn, Edst~ p I Span Totd Prksp v1D5 Span Extol , At I1,a54W~
Exist, Pa u0 - - - -
Now 01M (N1dnS ,000
Now RWenwp41dn1100
1130,
Option 5 - North Lakes CoTminity Center Natatorium
North
Now Nototor urn
Ufa (So th Dento
Lakes 12,000,000 I ptarpark
SReo ,000 No PorlYg9t0 was ;100 p i 15W'000
1slot, Met It 4W SP To 4Mea30a54SF o}lon, I ~ ~ $2,700,000
dot, porkhp 109 Span Toid PaMnd f 79 Span 11:1: Ana I 1404 SP
01 M Cats dblolorkvny M0 000 /yt, Edl Paklnq b0 Spoon J
New RwsrwMPbfNorin)160,600 /yr.
Option 6' . Norih Lakes c«m,Aty center Experlsion & f4ettatorium
Now Natoo
-
NOftfl D~IP&R S~D - i1~ 000 :4100 rh enk
~ /~,y 00Lakes wwPo'Idanpr~t0 sFN 0 Ig~00000 $2,700,000 P&R
R`0 1p00 No Corrvm,r~~ltyGaoler otion, $11000,000 DISD
R onolon ~,1~17c00000 Exi,I,Ar 1I,Ar n $0,700,000
E*f pak4lplt SP Prt= gi0hoocn Exist, Pn~p j
01 M Costal 1160,000 /yr. Total Atsal 40 740 SF
New Rovalm 160,000 / yr, told Par** X99 Swaii
Hof field Crookless Architects, Inc.
7615 Groonvllto AY*mio Salto 310
oolffat, Tom/ 75281 Febiery 21toss
ATTACHMENT I RWANd FOuery
Aponda Ne.
March 9, 1992 Summary of Options Agondaltom _i
alto ~~zf 37
s
OPTION 1 - TWO NEW DISTRICT CENTERS
i
If we develop two new centers and purchase a minimum of 25 acres
for each. new Community Park area, we would only be able to build i
centers approximately the size of North Lakes and Denia. These two
new centers would be approximately 11,560 sq.ft. which is f
approximately half the size of our new Martin Luther King, Jr.
center and similar in size to North Lakes and Denia which are too
small to adequately provide a full range of recreational services
as a 20,000 sq.ft. facility. They would also be extremely costly
to operate and maintain. We have estimated an annual expense of
$150,000 for each building but only approximately $10,000 in annual
revenue due to the small siaa.
i
i
OPTION 2 - EXPAND TWO EXISTING DISTRICT CENTERS
If we expand Denia and North Lakes Centers, it would add
approximately 10,000 sq.ft. to each facility which would bring the
centers up to approximately 20,000 sq.ft. which is the same size as
the Martin Luther King, Jr. Center. This gives us three District
Recreation Centers which are all the same size and allows us to
offer similar services to citizens in all three areas. operation
and Maintenance costs at each center will increase by $75,000, and
it is estimated that revenues will increase by $20,000 at each
facility.
OPTION 3 - NEW COMMUNITY CENTER (NEW SITE)
If we construct a new District Recreation center the same size as
the Martin Luther King, Jr. Center, it would add 20,000 sq.ft. of
space which would include a full size gym. Land for a Community
Park would need to be purchase in either Northeast or southeast
Denton. The total cost of this 25 acre tract would be
approximately $200,000. This option would provide a new $2 million
District center and allow a $250,000 renovation/expansion to both
North Lakes and Denia. The trouble with this option would be the
high cost of annual operation and maintenance costs of $175,000
compared to the small amount of revenue generated, $20,000 per
year. The major issue that must be dealt with in this option is
where the center is located. Both areas of town were told they
would get a center, and this would cause us to pit one area against
the other.
ATTACHMENT I
Agenda No.
March 9, 1992 Aflenda item
Page - 2 s
Dolo
OPTION 4 - NORTH LAKES COMMUNITY CENTER EXPANSION
If we develop North Lakes Center into a Community Center, it would
allow for a 20,000 sq.ft. expansion which would cost approximately
$2 million. This would create a facility that would be in excess
of 30,000 sq.ft. and would have a wide array of recreational
options for the entire community. It would also allow us to
provide some expanded facilities and programs for the neighborhoods
that adjoin the center which are now offered only a gym and fitness
activities. This option would cost approximately $10o,00o in
additional annual operation and maintenance costs and would
generate approximately $30,000 in new revenue. It also provides
$100,000 for both Denia and North Lakes Centers for renovation of
the existing buildings. By using the $2 million for the expansion
of North Lakes, it follows very closely the original intent of the
bond issue to provide additional recreation center space and does
it at a much lower cost than options 1, 2, and 3. New facilities
developed will include a full size gym, locker rooms, multipurpose
roam, meeting rooms, youth center, fitness expansion, racquetball
courts, and kitchen. This expansion will allow us to program six
major areas within the center.
OPTION 5 - NORTH LAKES CENTER NATATORIUM
If we build a natatorium without any support from the Denton
Independent School District, it would necessitate us spending $2
million on the development of the pool itself and not have any
funds left for expanding the North Lakes Center. Because there are
no funds for expansion, we will not be able, design wise, to create
one building. This will necessitate patrons going outside from the
Recreation center to the pool and will also cause us more in
operation and maintenance costs because we will need to have
separate building supervisors any time the buildings are open. We
estimate this will add approximately $20,000 in additional annual
personnel costs if we need a separate person to monitor the pool.
This option also provides $100,000 for both Denia and North Lakes
Centers for basic renovations. The North Lakes Center will
continue to function as an undersized center that will continue to
provide inadequate services to the public. It will also be hard
pressed to service or accommodate the large number of pool users
that may also want to pazticipate in fitness or gym activities.
Due to the pool expansion, we would be able to develop a number of
new aquatic programs and classes as well as provide the public a
great deal of time that is open for swimming on a year round basis.
This will allow us to program three major program areas within
these two facilities.
t
Agenua No, y~q -4 m
Mr.rch 9, 1992 A000a Itom_ /
Page - 3
ate ,~~a~-yz
OPTION b - NATATORIUM AND ExpANBION
This option would only be possible if the Denton Independent School
District participates in one half of the cost of the natatorium
which would be approximately $1 million. With their participation,
the total project funds go up to a total of $3.7 million which,
after purchasing a South Denton park for $500,000, leaves us $3.2
million for recreation center expansion. of that amount, $100,000
would be earmarked for renovation of the Dania center. The balance
would allow us to renovate and expand the North Lakes Recreation
Center into a Community Center by expanding the building by 100000
sq.ft. at a cost of $1 million, building a natatorium at a cost of
$2 million, and renovating the existing building at a cost of
$100,000. The total size of this new community center and Pool
would be in excess of 40,000 sq. ft, and would be one of the top
recreation facilities in the state. This option allows us to
program six major program areas within the center. Additional
amenities will include a regulation gymnasium, men's and women's
locker roams, fitness room, meeting rooms, multi-purpose room, and
creates a youth area to accommodate the recreational needs of young
children and teenagers.
10 214 363 0143 HCA,1NC- 1
~Qenda No..
Agendi Ilem
Hatfleid Crookfess Architects D&chk*Murn2a~4-92,
space Ptu►nl + Intarbra
' Genst k+llon
February 28, 1992 T
OPTION-NORTH LAKES COMMUNITY CEN'IrER
NATATORIUM AND EXPANSION
North Lake Recreation Center Expansion to Community Center
City of Denton Departmont of Parks and Recreation
1. Pool + Enclosure Related Construction:
(Option 5, lines 1.a through 1.s) r $ 1,981,300
2. New Recreation Center Related Construction:
a. New Construction: 10,086 of Cgs $76.04/sf w $ 756,844
b. Parking: 50 sp (1 sp/200 sf) (cp $8001sp - 40,000
a Landscape and Irrigation Allowance= 30,000
d. Site Utilities Allowance per slte r . 20,000
9. Building Furnishings Allowanced: 10,086 of C $3.00/of w 30,258
f. Equipment Allowance: 10,086 of @ $3,00/of r 30,258
......w.......... ...w»»..w..».
Sub Total Single Comm. Center (1,a thru 1,0: $ 907,380
Construction Contingency (3% of 1,g) 27,220
1. New Construction Total $ 934,580
J. A/E Planning Fees (7% of 1,1) 65,420
...............r..................................»....r.. r.. w....».._»»_.....»..»»».
k. Total New Construction, Recreation Comm. Center r $ 100000000
3. Renovation Costs - North Lake Centers
a. Renovatlons: 11,404 of existing 0 $8,04 • 91,743
b. A/E Planning Fes (Renovatlon: 9% of 3.a) w 8,267
a Total Probable Renovatlon Costs r $ IC0,000 'c
4.. Total Probable Cost (Pool + Expansion + Renovation) $ 3,0811 ,370 ,
,
6. Owner Related Expenses:
a. Site Survey: 4.600
b, Sall Testing: 3,500
o, AM Reimbursable Expenses: 81000
d. Pool Consultant Reimbursable Expenses: 2,600 }
w..._....»• w .........................M........»» w....................».
d. Total Owner Related Expenses: $ 18,70U j
rrrarrwmrrwwrwrrrrwrrrrrrrr.rrrrrrrrrrrrwwrrrwrrwwrrrrrawwrr~r
6. Total Probable Cost North Lake Center Exp. (Option 8): $ 3,100,000
7. Project Participation:
a. City of Denton Parks and Recreatlon (Municipal): $ 2,100,000
b. Denton ISM 112 of Pool (line 1) + 112 Owner Exp. (line 5,d) r $ 10000,000
wr.u.Y..MV....1.1w.......... I..,..»I.......... ........6....... I..... H....... ..+.w Y.Yw.I./Y
a Total Probable Cost (Iles 6): $ 3,100,000
A'T'TACHMENT II
INrnMn A, ~I , Jr„ AIA 14N1b1d Creeklatu Arehllw
derlsd~n H, CroeMh~4, AIA 7e160rwvA4Awnua SQ4.110Le•610 0",Tw4 ?W31
210MA100 {FAX 214?M-01431
s
ri
1& 214 303 0143 HCA. M pp i -
' Agenda w. 7_ o'O1D YOS
Hatfield Crookless Architects Ibtenda IrPm y9~
Mager Pkr hg Ar/ $Paw P"rq; + kit &rs 3
Cana rainn L■n>g
February 28, 1992
OA't`ION: 6'- NORTH LAKES COM14UNITY CENTER
NATATORIUM AND EXPANSION '
North Woes Recreation Center and Denla Recreation Center
City of Denton Department c f Parka and Recr:-i2don
1. summary North Lakes Community Center Natatorium and Expansion
a, Probable Coat
Natatorium Costs $ 2,000,000
North Lakes Center Expansion 100000000
North Woes Center Renovations 1000000
•1MNYww.Nw-N- MwwMNw--NNNMwwvy--N--N--NNNr-
Total Costa- North Lakes Community Center and Natatorium $ 3,100,000
Funding Participation: Denton Parks and Roo. $ 2,100,000
Denton lndep,Soh1DisMot: 10000,000
b, Total Area. Existing area 11,404 SF (109 Parking Spaces
Natatorium 19,260 SF 0 Parking Spaces
Expansion 10,086 SF (80 Parking Spaces
-wN-N-Yw-M-N--w-.N--Nw NNM--Nw-rryNw wN W,w
Total Area 40,740 SF (220 Parking Spaces)
o. New 0 & M Costs - North Lakes Center/Natatorlum 5160,000tyear
d. New Revenue - North Lakes Center/Natatorium $80,000/year
2, LAND ACQUISITION $ 500,000
3, RENOVATION OF DENCA RECREATION CENTER $ ]00,000
TOTAL $3700,000
DENTON I,S,D, PARTICIPATION _ 100-02
CITY OF DENTON TOTAL PARTICIPATION $W00,000
ChM 0 H, 4Lrek1•ii AJA AIA Hr • arrr rr Ar•M1 I
, 76 }8 0nr1wIM Avrtrr» BuIN910L661 Y pr1••, Trkar7!12,11
214:16;-0100 (FAX: fldit 0143)
r^r, l i
1r
OPT" I
mum"" • Mww La" Comom Mry tF111M ftmkIMIII OW mk w l
a Prob" GM
w E.oW 0 000.0600
Neia C.,I
Neatl.w cuw lwwrw Iro 0130
rw Car~iwai iw eaUVWC.MV wi+.rwrTii,ioo,ooo / `'//yy,
i1Mr4 Pr~b0Y0a. O&W PUN"FIw: itt00.Oro / l~l'•I
OMF• Y410 9d1 Dm 1,000.000
'too mw.
pOT 140,001 I1SO00 P) Ica F][UpeT ~iL 4at' ` ' -'7
raW ArM ,0.7W gF 1071 PWWV sm ) \ _cr%N 5UN 011ILGK
U Ilw 0 1 Y tYM1 • NwN IlM1 CMM•Mrs4+I $1 So,00Nryw
N1r Ph w MYM \WA N"oNwaw W UA0
W 1~{rYll!~
/ E1oUf'M.R 91. 11 t fg4c.. 1
1. 'LMefr.W
/ PITH O'!A t\
1 1
P3fiFiZiftm .
\
HNS M G *
/ diN
g11M'7h{/ FK~
W YS
d ;b 100 IUaPYT J ~
/ h. cult. - W W
z
CONCEPTUAL SITE DEVELOPMENT p
OPTION WX ($)I
NORTH LAKES COMMUNITY CENTER ~O
EXPANSION and NATATORIUM
py~OMS~D1parMMtd P1M Yd H1W44M \ 0
Hatfield Crookhul Archlhlatd, Ind.
rs+s o1110.uY Av.rN1, sd1101 O ~
t14J.IO000 r6f31FA%: 2IU "143 HCAOMIS
r,.
ri
Agenda No, -j~ JD/d
Hatfield Crookless Architects Agenda Item
We
~~b"414em""-"'
Space Planning + Interiors
Construction M naaement
February 28, 1992
;OPTION 4 - NORTH LAKES COMMUNITY CENTER
EXPANSION
North Lakes Recreation Center Expansion to Community Center
City of Denton Department of Parks and Recreation
1. New Construction (Typical Addition per Center):
a. New Construction: 20,074 sf @ $75.00/sf = $ 1,552,800
b. Parking: 96 sp (1 sp/215 sf) @ $800/sp = 76,800
c. Landscape and Irrigation Allowance = 30,000
d. Site Utilities Allowance per site = 20,000
e. Building Furnishings Allowanced: 20,074 sf @ $3.00/sf = 62,114
f. Equipment Allowance: 20,074 sf @ $3.00/sf = 62,114
g. Sub Total Single Comm. Center (a thru g): $ 1,803,828
h. Construction Contingency (3% of g.) 54,115
I. New Construction Total $ 1,857,943
J. A/E Planning Fees (7% of i.) 130,057
k. Total New Construction, North Lakes Comm. Center = $ 119881000
2. Renovation Costs - North Lakes Center:
a. Renovations: 11,404 sf existing @ $8.04 = 91,743
b. A/E Planning Fee (Renovation: 9% of 2.a) = 8,257
o. Total Probable Renovation Costs = $ 100,000
. . - -
3. Total Probable Cost (Expansion + Renovation) $ 2,088,000
4. Owner Related Expenses:
a. Site Survey: 3,000
b. Soil Testing: 2,000
c. Reimbursable Expenses: 7,000
d, Total Owner Related Expenses: $ 12,000
5. Total Probable Cost North Lakes Center Exp, (Option 4): $ 211001000
6, PARK LAND ACQUISITION $ 500) 000
7, RENOVATION OF DENIA RECREATION CENTER $ 300)000
TOTAL $2,700,000
Norman P. Hatfield,, Jr., AIA Hatfield Crookless Arohlisols
Christian H. Crookless, AIA 7515 Gioanvillo Avonuo 800 3101.8-519 Dallas, Texas 76231
2141353.9100 (FAX; 21403-041)
E'
f
Agenda No.
Hatfield Crookless Architects Agenda llw s,
Dale Master Plan NE2, -o? 11,b
Space Planning +_Tnte ors 'L
Construction Manaaemenv T ,3
February 28, 1992
OPTION 4' - SUMMARY
NORTH LAKES COMMUNITY CENTER EXPANSION
North Lakes Recreation Center
City of Denton Department of Parks and Recreation
1. Summary - North Lakes Center
a. Probable Cost - North Lakes Community Center
New Construction Costs $ 2,000,000
Renovation Costs 100,000
Total Costs - North Lakes Community Center $ 2,100,000
b. Total Area -Existing area 11,404 SF (109 Parking Spaces)
New Addition 20,074 SF (96 Parking Spaces)
Total Area 31,478 SF (205 Parking Spaces)
c. New O & M Costs - Nc,th Lakes Comm. Center $100,000/year
d. New Revenue - North Lakes Comm. Center $ 30,000/year
2, PARK LAND ACQUISITION $ 500.000
3, RENOVATION OF DENIA RECREATION CENTER $ 100,000
TOTAL $2,700,000
Norman P. Hetlisld, jr., AIA Hattlsld Crooklsss Arahltrits
Chriolisn H. Crookisss, AIA 7515GroonvilleAvenue 5ulio=L8.610 Dallas, Taus M311
2141363.0100 (FAX; 2141363-0t43)
i
G
OF, 43
nw.W cr . 14O l Camnurr 4a, \
oco
No. nwcr01Y1on~cor car 1 2 100 ON
i;,; caw • Ibr i,w Caw+y G,a1 ..._VI t.t Oo.0a0 / \
TOW N"
/ / \ \ \
Ara: I l' lo/ v 1190 pm" 906ea0
Nw Al04~on: "o u k (M pMy ° /
rar wa - ~+.m sr'-- jibs r.narK so.c«) • ~ \
D Ilw o • Y ca • rMr I comm. Cw {Ioo.ooogw
a. wa Ida • wm ub" Caw- cw wm r / \
hM+n~N4gs Rtt, cm
• 0muAr7~. 1.41~N
6. ~ / ~IYG.1rrc. .4
` / / WIHw~ u / \
nw- 1, Mew / TU~ NATAIORIUIy,
r
Rr
E~MC9 , o M1cN ! ~
r- X I is I N4 T G His R T'!
mmil W16 ;N \
/ r~ um •
/ ~ I ~ / \ / awanrts n.w crr.
1 1 l r - f/ O 5o low 11lOPMY A
/ Mn c
w 'd
W
/ CONCEPTUAL SITE OEVELOPMENT P
OPTION FOUR (4):
NORTH LAKES COMMUNITY CENTER
EXPA~1N~M31a0N ~RM"PAPll~Ohly)
apRM1 , °TbtYi
H# MNd Crol*Ws Arohlts0s, Mo.
> 1" IU.,.. s,w olo ~
7luibs;100 1A%: MVM1010 WAS MS
i
i
i~
,J
t
Agenda No.. 902 r0/D
Hatfield Crookless Architects Agendal
p~IOMasterPlanning~-~
Space Pla
Construcllon Manacemenl /lo
February 28, 1992
OPTION I TWO NEW DISTRICT CENTERS
This option will require additional land acquisition
City of Denton Department of Parks and Recreation
1, New Construction (Typical Single District Center):
ar New Construction: 11,560 sf @ $74.98/sf = $ 866,812
b. Parking; 58 sp (1 sp/200 sf) @ $800/sp = 46,400
c, Landscape and Irrigation Allowance 30,000
dr Site Utllitles Allowance per site = 20,000
e, Buliding Furnishings Allowanced: 9,008 sf @ $3.00/sf = 34,680
f. Equipment Allowance. 9,008 sf @ $3.00/sf = 34,680
g, Sub Total Single Comm. Center (a thru g): $ 1,032,572
hr Construction Contingency (3% of g,) 30,978
I, New Construction Total $ 1,063,550
J, A/E Planning Fees (7% of L) 74,450
k, Total New Construction, Single Comm, Center = $1,138,000
2. Owner Related Expenses:
a. Site Survey: 3,000
b, Soil Testing: 21000
o, Reimbursable Expenses: 7,000
d. Total Owner Related Expenses: $ 12,000
3. Total Probable Cost per Site (Option 1)c $ 10150,000
r
Norman R HOW$, Jr., AIA Heltlsld Crookltoo Arohllscts
Chrlstlan H, Crookless, AIA 75150ieonvllloAvenue suIL 4x35391500 (FAX: Texas01431
tl
{t
ii
Agenda No.
Hatfield Crookless Architects Agenda lie
[)ate Mtastar Plannln ;.2
Spaoe Planning
+ ntel ro-t s/7
an~eenne
February 28, 1992
OPTION 1 - PROGRAM OF AREAS
TWO NEW DISTRICT CENTERS
The following Is a program list of the spaces and sizes of spaces included In the two (2)
Identical, Option 1 New District Centers similar in size to the existing Denia and North
Lakes Recreation Centers, Each new District Center may include the following;
Description/Use Size of Area of
of Space:
Space Space
1, Covered Entry/Porch 13 x10 130 sf
2. Foyer (Inside A/C Vestibule) 20 x 10 200
3. Gymnasium (with Spectator Seating for 160) 94 x 68 6,392
4, Control Office/Central Check-Out 15 x 12 180
5, Center Supervisor's Office 10 x12 120
6, Games Hall 42 x 31 1,302
7. Vending and Snacks Area 11 x25 275
8, Men's Restroom/Locker Room with Shower 12 x 29 348
9. Women's Restroom/Locker nocin with Shower 12 x 29 348
10. Housekeeping and Custodial 7 x 24 168
11. Multl-Purpose Meeting Room (div. Into 2 Mtg Rms) 24 x 48 1,152
12. Craft Storage and Kiln Space 9 x 24 216
13. Total Area (Net) Programmed 10,651 sf
14 Gross Building Area (@ 92+% N/G Ratio) 11.560 sf
ji
Norman p, He11101d, Jr., AIA Hstf otd Crooklsss Arehitsots
Christian H CrooMrsas, AIA 7515 areenvllle Avenuo Suite 310 LB°519 Dallas, Taxes 76231
21413639100 (FAX: 214/3B3.0143)
t
r
I
t
Agenda No,
Hatfield Crookless Architects Agenda fteln-Are*4"k"
Space Planning + n er ors
ongtr~otion Manyaement/O
February 28, 1992
OPTION 1 - SUMMARY
TWO NEW DISTRICT CENTERS
Center "A" and Center "a" (To be named)
City of Denton Departmojnt of Parks and Recreation
1. Summary - Center "A" (To Be Named)
a. Probable Cost - Center "A"
New Construction Costs $1,150,000
New Park Land Costs 200,000
Total Cost - Center "A" $ 1,350,000
b. 'Total Area 11,560 SF (58 Parking Spaces)
o. New O & (Ni Costs - Center "A" $ 150,000/year
d, New Revenue - Center "A" $ 10,000/year
2. Summary - Center "B" (To Be Named)
a, Probable Cosi• - Center "B"
New Con;-traction Costs $1,150,000
New Park Land Costs 200,000
Total Cost - Center "B" $ 1,350,000
b, Total Area 11,560 SF (58 Parking Spaces)
o. New 0 & M Costs - Certer "a" $ 160,000/year
d. New Revenue - Center "B" $ 10,000/year
TOTAL $ 2,700,000
Norman P, Helfleld, Jr„ AIA Hatfield Crookleas Arahllecte
chrlatlan H. Crookless, AIA 7S160reonvJ1aAvonue Solto310tS-S1B Deltas, Texas 76231
2 1 413 6 3 91 00 (FAX: 214(363-0143)
P.
c
March 19, 1992
COST COMPARISONS OF THREE PRIMARY OPTIONS
ANNUAL ANNUAL NET TOTAL ANNUAL
OPTIONS SQ. FT. 0 & M1 REVENUE2 COST COST/SQ.FT.
option 1 - Two 23,000 300,000 20,000 280,000 $12.17
remaining New
Centers - as $2.8 mil.
proposed in the over 10 yrs
original bond issue
option 6 - Community 400000 150,000 80,000 701000* $ 1.75*
Center with
Natatorium and DISD $0.7 mil.
Participation over 10 yrs
option 4 - Community 30,000 100,000 30,000 70,000 $2.33
Center without
Natatorium $0.7 mil.
over 10 yrs
* This figure will lower with DISD participation in the operation and maintenance costs.
1 Operation and Maintenance costs include staffing, supplies, equipment, utilities, and
general maintenace and repair costs and are based on the value of 1991. dollars.
2 Annual Revenue is based on Fiscal Year 1990-91 revenue figures.
AJJ00298 \ Q
ATTACHMENT III
1
'J !
2
l
1
a
N
Agenda Nb, o9 4 /D
Agenda Item./
wto
J7
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201
M E M O R A N D U M
a a a a .a a
TO: Mayor 4tnd Members of the City Council
FROM: Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation
DATE: March 18, 1992
SUBJECT: Issues Related to Community Center Options
The following is a list of questions that are anticipated at
neighborhood meetings as staff presents options for implementation
of the remaining $2.7 million in 2986 bond funds. The staff
i responses are provided for background information.
i
GENERAL ISSUES
Question #1: Why can't the City build what was approved by
voters in the 1986 Bond Program?
Response #1: It is possible to build the two new centers using
the $2.7 million in existing Bond Funds. ]However,
government bodies have to make hard judgement calls
and the City of Denton simply can not afford to
implement what wau approved. In the current
economic climate, it does not seem logical to
consider opening two new recreation centers when
the City has been experiencing budget cutbacks
which have forced our existing facilities to
operate with minimal staffing, inadequate equipment
and supplies, and reduced operating hours.
The City would have to acquire land for the two new
centers. In addition, the value of the bond money
has eroded since 1986. We estimate that by the
time land is purchased and these facilities are
completed, the funds will only construct centers
that are 10,000 sq.ft. in size or half the size of
the Martin Luther King, Jr. Center. A center that
size would be similar to North Lakes and Denia
Centers which are already inadequate because of
8171566•8200 D/FwMErrzo 43a•25291 ATTACHMENT IV
Agenda No. "O/D
Agenda ElamDale '9
Page -2
their original reduction in size. In addition, the
Park Board has adopted the philosophy that all
futuro facilities will match the quality of the
Martin Luther King, Jr. Center and be maintained at
a level that retains that quality.
If we build two additional centers, they would be:
• Too small to adequately serve the areas in which
they would be built, half the size of the MLK
Center.
• Much more costly to operate and maintain per
square foot than a Community Center.
• Would provide a limited scope of services and
revenue.
• If we can not afford to adequately operate and
maintain our existing centers, why bring more
new facilities on line?
oues ion 02: What was approved in the 1986 Bond Election?
Response #2: Proposition #5 on the ballot in 1986 called for the
development of Athletic Fields, Neighborhood
Centers and a Senior Citizen Centers Expansion. We
are proud to say that of the $5.95 million approved
by voters the city has spent $3,250,000 to
implement a majority of the bond projects as
outlined below.
1. Projects funded to date:
a. East Recreation Center $102000000
- This is the MLK Center
completed in 1989
b. Senior Center Expansion $ 750,000
Completed in 1990
r
j
~i
Agnnda No, '92-0/'0
Page - 3 Agenda Item
Daw
a~ 3~
c. Athletic Field Development $1,3001000 7A"'7
This included:
- Denia (1988) - 2 softball fields
2 soccer fields
- Evers (1988) - 4 baseball fields
2 football fields
- North Lakes (in design) -
4 softball fields
5 soccer fields
2. Projects identified not yet funded:
a. Two Recreation Centers $2,700,000
Ouestion #3: Will there have to be another election to approve
the reallocation of the Bond Funds?
Response #3: A referendum is not required to reallocate Bond
Funds. In order to notify the public of the Cityfs
intent, four neighborhood meetings and two City
council public hearings will be held to solicit
citizen input.
i-ne Park Board and 91' Committee met and decided
that adequate information would not be available if
the item were simply listed on a ballot.
Therefore, the meetings and public hearings
(advertised in the Denton Record Chronicle) were
scheduled throughout the community to allow for a
proper presentation and open discussion between
citizens and staff members. A referendum would
further place the City Council in a difficult
position where they can not honor the vote due to
the operation and maintenance impact on the
operating budget.
Ouestion 14: These options do not address the need for
facilities in East/Northeast Denton.
Besgonse #4: The city realizes there 15 an inadequate supply of
recreation facilities in East Denton. However, the
operation and maintenance costs associated with a
new recreation center (apuroximately $175,000)
would significantly impact •ie operating budget of
the city preventing the implementation of other
urgent services.
A'dH.~... r~.,
S4S`
1~
E
Sl
J
4~
9~2 ~ o io
agenda No,
Agenda Item
Page - 4 .3~~-
lhle
a~~.~
POOL I88UE9
4uestian ~`5: Why does the City want an indoor pool?
Response ~r~5,: There are currently two competition size indoor
pools in Denton, at the University of North Texas
and Texas Woman's University. The pool as UNT is
not open to the public. The pool at TWU is open on
a limited schedule to Wellness Center members only
at a cost o£ $25 per month.
Benefits of a public indoor competition size pool
include:
- Provide access to general public (currently not
available)
- Acconunodate DTSD swimmers who now drive out of
town for practice and competition
- Provida extensive year round aquatic programming
including swimming lessons, scuba training,
therapeutic programming, etc.
- This year round faaili.ty generates more revenue
to offset operation and maintenance costs as
apposed to an outdoor pool which is open only
three months out of the year.
Question 1~6s Has DI5D agreed to pay for half of the pool?
Rest~onse DTSD staff has agreed to recommend the inclusion of
the cost of half of the pool construction ($1
million) in their Bnnd Hleotion scheduled for later
this year.
Question a~1s What would be the City's agreement with DTSD in
regard to the pool?
Remo s 7: If approved by voters, DISD will share in one half
of the cost of the pool construction. In return,
bTSD would be allowed to use the pool for practice
and swimming meets throughout the school year.
DYSD would also share in a portion of the operation y
and maintenance costs.
f'
E?
Agenda Na, w 9
Page 4 Agenda Item
Cite W._......
POOL ISSUES
Question 05: Why does the City want an indoor pool?
Response: There are currently two competition size indoor
pools in Denton, at the University of North Texas
and Texas Womants University. The pool as UNT is
not open to the public. The pool at TWU is open on
a limited schedule to wellness Center members only
at a cost of $25 per month.
Benefits of a public indoor competition size pool
include:
- Provide access to general public (currently not
available)
- Accommodate DISD swimmers who now drive out of
town for practice and competition
- Provide extensive year round aquatic programming
including swimming lessons, scuba training,
therapeutic programming, etc.
- This year round facility generates more revenue
to offset operation and maintenance costs as
opposed to an outdoor pool which is open only
three months out of the year.
Question #6: Has DISD agreed to pay for half of the pool?
Response #6: DISD staff has agreed to recommend the inclusion of
the cost of half of the pool construction ($1
million) in their Bond Election scheduled for later
this year.
Question #7: What would be the City's agreement with DISD in
regard to the pool?
Response #7: If approved by voters, DISD will share in one half
of the cost of the pool construction. In return,
DISD would be allowed to use the pool for practice
and swimming meets throughout the school year.
DISD would also share in a portion of the operation
and maintenance costs.
L.
i,
r
S{
Apenda No.
Agenda Item~~!
Page - 5 (late .3-,AtV- 92-
a
Question #8: Why does the City want to share a pool with DISD?
Response #8: Both agencies will benefit from this shared
facility. DISD will be able to provide an indoor
pool to students without the burden of full
operation and maintenance liability.
In turn, the City will be able to provide a pool to
the general public which it would not be able to
accomplish without DISD participation.
This is a good example of two taxing agencies
cooperating to provide a needed facility to
taxpayers.
DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
estion #9: What is the impact on the tennis center?
Response #9_: In both development options (6 and 4), the
gymnasium will abutt the existing play courts
(where the basketball goals are located). The
natatorium would be constructed immediately
adjacent to the tennis courts.
Due to the limited space around the recreation
center, configuration of the expansion was required
to the west toward the tennis courts. Future
development of the tennis center will be focused to
the south and west. Fortunately, none of the
courts will have to be removed due to the
expansion.
Question 10: What is the impact on the residents to the east?
Response 10: The architect has designed the expansion to the
west away from the neighborhood to reduce this
impact. In addition, low continuous earthen berms
with tree and shrub screening will provide a
barrier between the neighborhood and pool area.
Question #11: Regarding park land acquisition in south Denton.
Response #11: and can only say there acquisition inthe likely section ]of park
city in the near future.
Y
l
Page 6 Agenda No.--__~ 4/d
-
Agenda Itam A'j
lJale a s~qz
nest- inn Wiz?: Will the
community Center be able to properly maintain a
Response #12; R significant reason for delaying construction of
implementation of the bond funds was the operation
and maintenance costs needed for two center
Operation and maintenance costs for the S.
community
center is significantly lower and will have less
impact on the City's operating budget. And because
the City is committed to properly maintaining all
new constructed facilities, the Parks and
Recreation Departmentfs operating budget will be,
increased to allow for the expected operation and
maintenance costs associated with the expansion of
North Lakes to a community Center.
Question 13: W?iy would we consider the option to construct a
Community Center?
se F13; The community Center option
recreation center square footage provides
(30,000 hs most
and includes racquetball courts which wool
generate a great deal of revenue for the faciliity.l
other amenities will include a new re ti
gymnasium, mans and women locker rooms regulation
rooms, multi-purpose rooms to accommodate classes
(aerobics, dance, craft, etc,) and a youth area
with a game room and two multi-purpose rooms to
accommodate the recreational
of young
children and teenagers. This option mead&
closely fo?lows the original, intntf also more
issue whi ' was to provide two the bond
recreation anters, additional
OuestLQn #14: Why then would we consider a
partnership? natatorium with DisD
8002D9 9-J3416 The reason a DTSD partnership in
should be considered over a community center Is:
• Gets the DTSD involved with an indoor, pool which
brings in an additional $1 million for
construction of the facility. They would also
be responsible for a portion of the operation
and maintenance costs.
r
C
Benda Na..____902 -Of0
Page 6 AgOlida item
-
W16
a5
Ouestion X12; Will the City be able to properly maintain a
community center?
Response #12: A significant reason for delaying construction of
the two approved centers and reconsidering
implementation of the bond funds was the operation
and maintenance costs needed for two centers.
Operation and maintenance costs for the community
center is significantly lower and will have less
impact on the City's operating budget. And because
the City is committed to properly maintaining all
new constructed faalilies, the Parks and
Recreation Departmentf:-: operating budget will be
increased to allow for the expected operation and
maintenance costs associated with the expansion of
North Lakes to a Community Center.
Question #13: Why would we consider the option to construct a
Community Center?
Response 13: The Community Center option provides the most
recreation center square footage (30,000 sq.ft.)
and includes racquetball courts which would
generate a great deal of revenue for the facility.
Other amenities will include a new regulation
gymnasium, mens and women looker rooms, meeting
rooms, multi-purpose rooms to accommodate classes
(aerobics, dance, craft, etc.) and a youth area
with a game room and two multi-purpose rooms to
accommodate the recreational needs of young
children and teenagers. This option also more
closely follows the original intent of the bond
issue which was to provide two additional
recreation centers.
Question 114: Why then would we consider a natatorium with DISD
partnership?
Response #14: The reason a DISD partnership in a natatorium
should be considered over a community center is:
• Gets the DISD involved with an indoor pool which
brings in an additional $1 million for
construction of the facility. They would also
be responsible for a portion of the operation
and maintenance costs.
3
C`,r :ir t
id) 1'.1(x::
j:
Agenda No. _ya -D Jb
Page - 7 Agenda Ilem•.___
Da:e
• Creates a Community Center that would be 40,000
sq.ft. in size, approximately 20,000 sq.ft. each
for both the pool and the center. This option
provides 10,000 sq.ft. more of recreation
center/pool space than Option 4.
• Provides the broadest range of facilities of all
the options and bringLi in the most revenue per
square footage then any other option including
the two new centers approved by voters.
• Leaves open the option of adding racquetball
courts or some other types of facilities at some
point in the future.
• Provides an indoor pool which would:
- Allow for a year round swimming program and
public swimming.
- Allow the DISD swim team and other school
groups to use the facility during the school
year,
- Provides for the therapeutic and fitness needs
f of many Denton residents.
Ouestion #15: Why put all of our money at one location?
Response #15: By creating a Community Center at North Lakes, we
will be able to:
{ • Get DISD involved in half of the pool cost ($1
million) and some operation and maintenance
costs.
• Have the greatest revenue generation potential.
• Have the least amount of operation and
maintenance cost per square foot of facility.
• Have the widest variety of programs and
facilities for the public.
1
r
Steve RrInkman-
AJJ002A1
'l
Z V A+},
1
l
t'
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 41nda No. v~0 /d
5:30 P, M, , MONDAY Agonda liom
FEBRUARY 24, 1992 wig
SENIOR CENTER ~7 _
MEMBERS PRESENT: Dalton Gre or.1~
Tom Judd, Vice~ Chairman
Chairmant
Catherine Bell
Burkley Harkless
STAFF PRESENT; Betty McKean, Executive Director for Municipal
Services and Economic Development
Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation
Bob Tickner, Superintendent of Parks
Alicia Mentell, Superintendent of Leisure Services
Pam Livingston, Leisure Services Administrator
Janet Simpson, Park Planning Coordinator
Cathy Avery, Supervisor, Goldfield Tennis Center
Joy Hesch, Administrative Secretary
GUESTS PRESENT: Sherry Foutch, Denton GirlsI Softball Association
Mark Williams, Denton Boy's Baseball, Inc.
Wayne Allen, Denton Baseball, Inc,
Jane Malone, Denton Youth Soccer Association
Rich Slivocka, Denton Area Little League
Eddie Ary, Denton Youth Football Association
Sally Leigheber, Denton Tennis Association
1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Dalton Gregory, Chairman.
II. APPROVAL OF MINU ES FROM LAST ME IN
On a motion by Catherine Bell, second of Burkley Harkless, the
minutes of the meeting of January 13, 1992, were approved.
III. ACTION ITEMS
A. Consider Standards for Co-sponsored Youth Sports
Associations, (Bob Tickner)
Bob began the discussion by stating that staff had
combined the first proposed standards, the standards for
concessions, and suggestions from the representatives of
the associations as well as members of the Park Board
into a more simplified version. The purpose was to make
the financial reporting procedures less complicated.
Also, Item 10.C. had been added because of some concerns.
The item now states, "in naming divisions, no name may be
used that might refer to inferior or lower level status
of participants unless name is a trademark of a
nationally franchised organization approved as a co-
sponsored association."
Dalton asked if any of the Board members of the
associations had any questions,
ATTACHMENT V
ti
W
1I
!f
ParkL and Recreation Advisory Hoard Meeting Agatida No. 9~ /b
February 24, 1992 AQendaltmm~
Page - 2
4?
III.A. (continued)
Tom asked Bob to elaborate on why the financial reporting
procedures were essential.
Steve said that in the past, due to turnovers in the
governing boards of the associations, records had been
incomplete and/or unavailable when questions or problems
arose.
Dalton asked for further clarification on the phrase
"source of receipt" which is found on page 2, section 8,
second sentence of the standards. He inquired as to
whether the department wanted a copy of each check or the
deposits.
Bob clarified that the department is not asking for a
copy of each chock, just a copy of the checkbook log.
Dalton suggested that the item could read "copy of the
checkbook log." He said that item IX.F. would mean more
accountability. He would like for the associations to be
more accountable but does not want the reporting to be a
burden. He felt that the wording needed some work.
Wayne Allen of Denton Baseball, Inc. had some comments
regarding the Standards which were;
Item IV.A. - should include "per league" at the end of
the statement.
Item IV.B. - should include "per league0l at the end of
the statement.
Item VIII. - the purpose of the item would be served by
copies of bank statements rather than a
checkbook log.
Item IX.A. - questioned the meaning of the $50 cash
reimbursement limit. Bob clarified that
no reimbursements over $50 could be made
in cash and should be handled with a
check reimbursement.
Item IX.E. - questioned the requirement for two
meetings per year, It would be too
costly. Dalton said it means two board
meetings per year, not of the membership.
The wording should be changed from
"advertised" meetings to "announced"
meetings.
Item XI.C. - the concession stands will not meet
health department requirements unless
renovations are done. Steve commented
that the Parks Department has no control
over that situation. Bob said it may
depend on the types of food sold. Wayne
iI
j~
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting AgendaNo,_ 9oP Ole
February 24, 1992 -
Page - 3 Agenda Item__ _ ~0/ `
Item XI.C. (continued)
suggested that the item be written as a
disclaimer.
Item IX.K, - wanted clarification of "special events'$.
Item XII. - could see a problem with the dates and
times. Wayne said his league would start
practicing on March 1 this year and next
year they would probably start practicing
in February. He felt the dates should be
moved up. He would also like to have a
Fall baseball league from September 1 to
November 1, Dalton commented that the
paragraph states the fields would be on a
first come, first served basis at times
other than those stated. Steve said the
fuses for the lights are installed on
March 1, and the fields are available on
a rental basis until April 1 when they
will be available for regular practice.
There are no funds in the budget to cover
the additional maintenance required for
ntarting earlier, and the crews currently
have a limited amount of time to work on
the fields. Dalton said that there
probably should be more funds for
operation and maintenance built into the
budget. Wayne said the purpose of a fall
league is to provide a recreational
program for the kids who do not play
football. Dalton said the cost of such a
program needs to be calculated.
Rich Slivocka, representing the Denton Area Little
League, wanted clarification of what PAL stands for and
what sports would be involved. Alicia Mentell said PAL
stands for Police Athletic League. PAL looks at where
there is a need and they will not compete with other
athletic associations. This year PAL ran the basketball
program and plans to also sponsor, a boxing program.
The consensus of the associations was that there may be
a problem with allowing only the child(ren) of head
coaches to be assigned to specific teams. A lot of
parents want to e~,rpool. Dalton suggested that this may
be taken care of by selecting teams from a neighborhood.
Bob said the teams should be formed by a draft through an
open process and then, if in agreement with everyone,
teams can be made up to accommodate those wishing to
carpool. Mark Williams said that Denton Boyts Baseball,
Inc, uses an appeal process to try to accommodate
carpooling and the standards may be revised to allow for
some sort of appeal process. Dalton suggested that Bob
work with the groups to come up with some alternate
wording.
f
l
s
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting Agenda No, . y~ -e~ ~D
February 24, 1992 Agenda llem-_-A
Page - 4 Dato
~37
Dalton asked for a motion approving the standards with
the understanding that amendments can be made later.
A motion was made by Tom Judd and seconded by Burkley
Harkless that the Proposed Standards for Youth Sports
Associations be approved with the amendments to Section
IV and Section VIII. The motion was passed unanimously.
A draft of the standards with the amendments will be
prepared for review at the next meeting.
B. Consider Recommendations for Reallocation of Bond Funds
for Recreation Center. (Steve Brinkman/Norm Hatfield)
Steve introduced Norm Hatfield, the consultant hired for
looking at options for reallocation of bond funds. Steve
said that Norm had designed the senior center, Denia
Recreation Center, and North Lakes Recreation Canter.
Norm presented six options, one which includes the
construction of a pool in cooperation with the Denton
Independent school District.
The six options were as follows:
Option 1 -,Renovate North Lakes and Denia Recreation
centers and build two new 9,008 sq.ft,
recreation centers as approved in the 1986
bond program.
Option 2 - Expand North Lakes and Denia Recreation
Centers with park land acquisition
option 3 - Renovate Iforth Lakes and Denia Recreation
Centers and build new district center with park land
acquisition
Option 4 - Expand North Lakes Recreation center and
renovate Denia Recreation Center with park land
acquisition
Option 5 - Expand North Lakes Recreation Center to
include an indoor pool and renovate Denia Recreation
Center with park land acquisition
option 6 - Expand North Lakes Iacreation center and
include an indoor pool in cooperation with DISD and
renovate Denia Recreation center with park land
acquisition
Norm, with the aid of charts, explained the advantages
and disadvantagus of each option. Staff Is recommendation
was Option 4. Dalton asked the reason for staff
recommending option 4 over Option 5. Steve said that
is
Agonda No, 70? -Ole
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting Agenda Item--.--,L 'lil/
February 24, 1992 Dalo _ 3?~T 92
Page - 5
building a pool at North Lakes would not allow expansion
of the center for other activities such as a new
gymnasium, game room, meeting rooms, and an expanded
fitness facility. These new facilities would allow more
neighborhood participation by families and young people.
Without these expanded facilities, the center remains at
a size that is insufficient for providing quality
services.
Tom commented that in his experience in using the center
at North Lakes the people want an expanded facility. He
said the area residents might feel short changed to have
a pool and not have the center expanded also. The center
needs room for weights and racquetball courts. He
questioned the figures for operation and maintenance
costs of Options 4 and 5. He thought it would cost more
to maintain a pool than was indicated. Steve said the
operation and maintenance costs were taken from other
cities' pool operations.
Tom said he would like to recommend option 6 if DISD
would go along with the plan. He did not like option 5
because North Lakes Center is too small and needs to be
enlarged rather than have a pool built. His second
choice would be option 4.
Catherine would recommend option 6 only if DISD
participates, Her second choice would be option 5 and
the third choice would be Option 4.
Burkley said he likes option 6 because of the
competitiveness it would create and would help in keeping
the kids involve. His would like to see options 4 and 6
combined. His second choice would be option 5 and third
choice would be Option 4 because it allows funds for the
renovation of Dania center.
Betty said she likes option 6 because of the new programs
it would allow but would want to know how realistic it is
to anticipate a partnership with DISD.
Dalton said he also likes Option 6 but felt Option 5
would be more conducive to a wider range of participants.
Betty asked the Board if they would be willing to defer
expending bond funds until there was a commitment from
DISD. Dalton said DISD would have a bond election in May
for $5 million per year.
try,
it
4
ii
Agenda No.
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting Agenda Ilam #J
February 24, 1992
Page - 6 (hto ` a 9z
.3z~3 f
Tom suggested that the center supervisors from North
Lakes and Denia attend a future meeting so the Board
could hear their opinions.
The consensus of the Board was to build one facility
rather than two.
C. Consider Projects Recommended for 1996-97 Capital
Improvement Program. (Steve Brinkman)
Steve said aach member would be contacted by phone to get
their recommendations for CIP projects.
D. Consider Revisions to Fees and Charges Ordinance.
(Alicia Mentell)
Alicia said this item dealt with raising fees at the
Goldfield Tennis Center to bring them in line with the
City Council's philosophy of 50% cost recovery. To
explain the terminology, she said the court reservation
fee was used when a person wanted to call in advance to
reserve a court for play. A rental fee is when a person
wishes to hold a tournament on four to eight courts.
Tom asked if any courts are available when a tournament
is going on. Sally Leigheber, representing the Denton
Tennis Association, responded that there are neighborhood
courts available at other park sites if all at the tennis
center are being used for a tournament.
eurkley moved that the Board recommend adopting the
proposed fees. Tom seconded the motion, and the motion
was passed with three voting in favor of, the motion and
one against.
IV. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
Due to the length of the meeting, the consensus of the Board
was to table the informational items.
V. O THE
None.
VI. EXECUTIVE SESSION
Dalton made the following statement:
"As Chair of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, I hereby
advise you that the Board is going into closed session for
deliberation pursuant to section 143.053(d) of the Texas Local
Government Code, and section 2G of the Texas open Meetings
Act. The time is now 9:03pm, and the date is February 24,
1992.11
f
'R
o
r'
Agenda No, 9~ -ova
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting
February 24, 1992 Agenda lem ~
Page 7 Ikle 'a
'Ay 3
At the end of the Executive Session, Dalton stated:
"The time is now 9:20pm, and the date is February 24, 1992,
and the Board is now reconvening into open session to vote on
the disposition of this action as required by section
143.053(d) of the Texas Local Government Code.10
After the meeting was reconvened, Catherine Bell moved that
the Park Board should recommend to the City that the land
should be purchased for a park. Tom Judd seconded the motion,
and the motion was passed with a unanimous vote.
VII. ADJOURN
On a motion by Catherine Bell, second of Burkley Harkless, the
meeting was adjourned.
i
j AJJ00269
i
G
Minutes of the Special Meeting Mon~fa No. _ 90~ -O/O~
of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Agenda Item 7TH/
March 10, 1992, 5:30 P.M. fbto.. x-07
Denton Senior Center f..
'aMembers present: Dalton Gregory, Chairman `
Tom Judd, Vice Chairman
Neta Stallings
Staff present: Betty McKean, Executive Director for Municipal
Services and Economic Development
Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation
Alicia Mentell, Superintendent of Leisure
services
Bob Tickner, Superintendent of Parks
Janet Simpson, Park Planning Coordinator
Joy Hesch, Administrative Secretary
Guest present: Norm Hatfield, Hatfield Crookless Arch., Inc
Dalton called the meeting to order. He said the purpose of the
meeting was to reconsider alternatives for the implementation of
bond funds for recreation facilities.
Steve Brinkman said more detailed floor plans of Options 4, 5, and
6 have been developed after receiving staff input. He then
relinquished the floov to Norm Hatfield, who presented drawings of
the three floor plans for the members to consi'der. The options are
as follows:
Option 4 - North Lakes Community Center Expansion
This option would allow for a 20,000 sq.ft. expansion of the
North Lakes Recreation center and would cost approximately $2
million. This would create a facility that would be in excess
of 30,000 sq.ft. which would include a full size gym, looker
rooms, a multipurpose room, two meeting rooms, a youth center,
expansion of the fitness center, three racquetball courts, and
a snack area. This concept loaves space for the possibility
of the addition of an indoor swimming facility in the future.
Option 5 - North Lakes Community Center and Natatorium
This option would allow for a swimming pool facility without
any financial support from the Denton Independent School
District. The facility would be operated separately from the
main North Lakes Recreation Center and would cost
approximately $2 million. Since the pool would be a separate
facility sharing only a common wall, the personnel costs woW.d
increase by approximately $20,000 annually for additional
staff to monitor the facility. The option would provide
$100,000 for both Denia and North Lakes Centers for basic
renovations only and would leave North Lakes undersized an,t.
not able to adequately accommodate the added burden of the
pool users who would also use the center.
ATTACHMENT V
i.
Pi
i
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board A99nda No. 90? -D/,o
Minutes of Special Meeting
penda Ilem_/
March 10, 1992
Page - 2 Wo
3s a~ .97
0 tion 6 - orth kes Co m nit Center Expansion and Natato iu
The concept for this option would be possible only with the
Denton Independent School District sharing in the cost of the
swimming facility which would be approximately $1 million for
each entity. This would allow the City to expand North Lakes
Recreation center building by 10,000 sq.ft. at a cost of $1
million, reserve $500,000 for purchase of park land, and
provides $100,000 for the renovation of the Denia Recreation
Center. The total cost of the center expansion would be
approximately $3.1 million for a facility in excess of 40,000
sq.ft.
Norm said the plans were conceptual, and in Options 4 and 6, the
configuration of the different areas could be changed.
Steve said staff's recommendation would be to pursue Option 6 with
the cooperation of DISD and option 4 if the school district was
unable to participate.
D
prior to the regular Park alton will be meetit,g with the 11910 Committee on Monc!ay, March 23,
meetings with Council and the r19111 Committee, four neighborhood
meetings would be held in different areas of the city and two City
council public meetings in order to receive input from the
community.
Dalton commented that he felt that the City would be missing out on
a great opportunity for an indoor pool if Option 6 was not
recommended. He said it looks favorable that DISD would include
the $1 million required for their share for the pool in their bond
election in May. He thought it would probably be considered as a
separate issue. If DISD is unable to participate, he would
recommend Option 4 because of the provision for racquetball courts,
an area for youth, and an expanded fitness area plus leaving space
for a pool in the future. He said he would prefer eliminating the
two meeting rooms which would allow space for three additional
racquetball courts for a total of six. He felt the courts would
bring in more, revenue than the meetings rooms.
Tom did not include a pool as his top priority since the recreation
center facilities were inadequate. He was also concerned that a
pool was not included in the last bond election. His
recommendation is to go with option 4 which provides the
racquetball courts and expanded fitness area. He stated that he is
a member of the Denton Square Athletic club and has observed no
heavy use of the pool while the racquetball courts are in great
demand. He would like to see at least four courts at North Lakes
for the possibility of holding racquetball tournaments in the
facility. Norm agreed that four courts are necessary for
tournaments.
A
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Agenda No,
Minutes of Special Meeting Agenda Item
March 10, 1992
Page - 3 tklo
Tom suggested that another option should be made availe.ble for the
citizens to consider at the public meetings. The option would show
the effects if the money for a future South Denton park might
instead be added to the facility.
Dalton said that in his opinion adding more options would cloud the
issue.
Norm clarified that Option 4 would allow for future expansion or
construction of a pool if the natatorium was not approved.
Neta said she was in favor of recommending Option 6 if DISD can
participate in the cost of construction. She feels the heated pool
would be a benefit to the whole community, especially for
therapeutic uses. The only pool which is open for public use is
the one at Texas Woman's University, and that pool is usually too
cola for therapeutic activities. She and her family have
investigated using the indoor pool in Lewisville as an alternative.
If DISD is unable to participate, she would recommend option 4
because it still provided for the possibility of a future pool.
The Qonsensus of the Board was in favor of option 6 with DISD
cooperation and with option 4 as a backup if DISD was unable to
participate.
As follow up, Steve Brinkman was requested to discuss the options
with Catherine Bell and Burkley Harkless to determine their choice
of options.
NOTE: At a separate meeting, Catherine Bell and Burkley Harkless
selected Option 6 as the best use of bond funds.
AJJ00285
PoWffW4
7rr:3rtrr,
Agenda No. yo2D/O
Agenda Item,
Date
3 7 a~ 3 ~
CITY of DENTOM, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 78201 / TELEPHONE (817) 668.8307
Office of the City Manager
MF.MQRANDi.TNI
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
FROM: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager
DATE: March 16, 1992
SUBJECT: '91 Committee Recommendation
i
The 191 Committee will be meeting on Monday, March 23, 1992, with
Dalton Gregory, Chairman of the Parks Board, to be briefed on the
options for the last rec center money. We will be able to report
on their recommendations at your City Council meeting Tuesday
night.
i
Rick aSvehla
Deputy City Manager
RS:bw
AMM0010B
i
=a
CITY
~ COUNCII
ooooaaoo~o~,o~~..-
0~~0{ o r c ~ GAO l-~
000 ~ v ~000~
r~
--mot--
r
l~
k~
Agenda No.
Agenda I1am-40-14
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP b;to
Tuesday, March 24, 1992 Il R' /D
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
RE: DISCUSSION OF THE STORM WATER UTILITY
MARXm
On Tuesday, March 10, 1992, Bob Coplen, Chairperaon of the Council's Storm
Water Utility Committee, presented the Committee's report. The Council
accepted the report at that time and requested that the issue of establishing
a storm water utility be placed on a future Council workshop for additional
discussion.
The next phase in the process of establishing a storm water utility, if the
Council decides to do so, would be to develop an Action Plan which will include
the necessary public hearings. A suggested Action Plan schedule Is attached
as Exhibit III. The Committee recommended that the storm water utility be
established, but left the implementation of the utility fees as an issue for
Council's later deliberations.
To establish the utility will require, 1) preparation of an ordinance; 2) giving
appropriate legal notice to the public, and 3) the holding of a public hearing.
If, after these steps are taken, the Council adopts the ordinance and
establishes the storm water utility, the utility may either continue to be
funded by ad valorem taxes, or the Council can decide to take the next step
and develop and set storm water fees (rates). If the Council decides to set
the fees, this process could take from four to six months, This process will
entail developing a good data base, designing the rate structure and holding
a second public hearing specifically for the rates.
The Storm Water Committee and the Staff recommend that the City proceed
with establishing; the Storm Water Utility, but leave the decision about
whether to adopt storm water fees to a budget discussion Item.
Attached Is Exhibit I, a summary tabulation of the Storm Water
Committee's recommendations, Exhibit II, an excerpt of the State law
relating to setting up storm water utilities (Section 402.045 relates to
the public hearings, etc., required to set up the utility), and Exhibit
III, Suggested Action Plan Schedule.
Pre red sp idly,
Y'
R. E, son, Execut veDirector Lloyd V Harrell
Department of Utilities City Manager
Exhibits 1: Tabulation of Storm Water Committee Recommendations
II: State Law
III: Action Plan Schedule
A18'1}WM.CC disk 83 pg. 2
f,.
1'1
r{
Agenda No. D /O ^
Agenda Rom
Date 3'a~ 9
EXHIBIT I
STORMWATER UTILITY
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
■ ESTABLISH UTILITY IMMEDIATELY
■ IMPLEMENT FEE WITH FY93 BUDGET CYCLE
OR REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
■ BASE ALL FEES ON IMPERVIOUS ACREAGE
■ BILL OCCUPANT
■ INITIAL FEE UNIFORM FOR ALL RESIDENCES,
DIFFERENTIATE WHEN PRUDENT
■ TWO TIERED FEE FOR MOBILE HOME PARKS
■ ASSESS APARTMENT COMPLEXES INDIVIDUALLY
■ PRO RATE COMMERCIAL FEES TO OCCUPANTS
■ 25% EXEMPTION TO GOVERNMENT PROPERTIES
■ SEEK 25% EXEMPTION FOR CHURCHES
■ PROVIDE CREDITS FOR ON SITE
STORMWATER FACILITIES
t7
i,
§ 402,017
WATER AND
¢ 402,017. Water Syrteen in HomeTBale MuniclpaJftleS
(See main talume for tat 1(o°) and Agenda llotn_
(c) The muaici li and MY
(kilo 3 0? May we -
to require pwater eu8tomere eto action too ~----9
and maintain the system
paY charges int peRte and
posed for the water furnished. ~U
'mended by Acts (See main volume for test of (d) J
1989, 714t I.eg„ ch. 304, 1 2, eK. Aug. 28, 1989.
Nlet0tieW and Staha" Notre
1989 1.erlelatlon
The 1989 amendmen w ter supplied secure t ~ ent of charges for
deleted nctund t, at the end Of aubsec, icl, the o+rnere P Perty to the owner,
g the imposition of a Ilea or property agent or the pereso in charge of he
SUHCfL'FMR C, MUNICIPAL DRAINAGE Z"I'ILITy SYSTEMS
Acts 19A9, 71st Ley„ C& 1Pf0 ; 1 ont"ded flay subchapter f
§ 402,041, Short title $ubeh Amended biapter may be
Acts 19917 LRted as the Stualetp Drainage Utility Systems Act,
Y 6, ch. 852, ¢ 1, off, June 16. , 199 199E
Historical and Statutory Notes The acts an'd 9e dated
1911 Leg4lsttoa data they oe urr m° YeV ae of the
Sections 9 and 4 of the 1991 Act pmride; "5ee.4
"Sec. 9. 'A"lion not Effect oa IJtlgagoai The AM does
The governmental " apply to any y matter that on the eN
and Proceedings a of a m date of this Act ectivs
the effective d data of t1t1a0Pebty taken before
estabWhmeat, tmaactag, and oPeRtlobn oL~ mu ulumately nnults la the nAtter ben 8 bdiatpa g Fold n1cJPrlly owned d++itWte system w not be fd by r fmalaudgmeat of
a court of mmPetlai beld
mraJ
invalid on the grouw that the ataMment and Nriadktbo;
operation OL a ID
tam were not perfor to owned bsiuge aye. "(2) has been held 4amt bff a Cmal
accordance with law, of r court of competent Juriad)cA fin Judgment
402,042. Leglaladve 14tdhag
(a) The legislature ffads that authority is needed to,,
ea4blpermit un ~ to establlah a mUnk4w u serviol ~a+t1e utility system within the
(2) Provide rules for the tne; operwyo1e,
(3) protect the public health and Bate otF the system; , wstjr property caused potat wne overflaw". surftace~ etsgnawn sera Ponution
atiaing from D0a runoff within the bo
area: ttadaries of the established Service dele
th declare, system created to
afar a public hearing, a drainage
under~yb~the tee torbe a pub tft
(b) preeen'be bases on whkh is mualeipal
Lees is support of the System may be sueasdrs4W ed utility system may be funded and
(6) Provide exam
pdoas of twtaln peraoas from " saubch U d
Proecrfbe other vales related to the subject of mataktprtl
(bl This subchapter is rauttedjaL dminage.
Aft4inded 1 1 by m Aft 19lW1, 7 4'' 6, 1211 11(b> at, Ale 94 19 Acb 19117 Iyd > e~ .
141E
EXHIBIT
a
i
i
WA'T'ER t" UnuTIE9 p~/
Title is a~~$1 0. 7v~ " Q ~Q
ttbtoricai and Statutory 4otes prwsbaa or applications of this Act tntaC W1461
1999 Legislation given effect without the invalid Provt' or ap.o!
Secuoos NO and 2 of the 1989 amendatory act Plication, and to this end the proviabll t}>T--
provide: Act are declared to be severable,"
"See, 1, (a) Subchapter C. Chapter 402, Local
Government Code, is amended by this section." 1991 L*lialstlon U
'Sec. 2. If any provWon of this Act or its For validation and application provisions of the
spplicadoa to any person or rircumstances is 1991 amendatory act, see Historical and Statu.
held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other Wry vote fallowing 1 402.041,
¢ 402,040, Application of Subehapter to Municipalities
This subchapter appl es to any municipality,
Amended by Acts 1989, 713t Leg., eh 1230, 1 1(0, eft. Aug. 28, 1989; Aes 1991, 72nd Leg„ ch. 852,
¢ 1, eff, June 16, 1991,
Hlatorteat and Statutory Notes
1991 Legislation
For validation and application provisions of the
1991 amendatory act, we Historical and Statu-
tory Note following 1 402.041,
¢ 402.044, DeMitlons
In this subchapter.
(1) "Senefitted property" meana a lot or tract to which drainage service is rnade
available under this subchapter and which receives water, wastewater, or electric utility
service from the mtmlelpallty having jurisdiction to adopt this subchapter and declare
the drainage of the municipality to be a public utility,
(2) "Cost of service" as applied to a drainage system iwrvice to any benefitted
property mesas.
(A) the prorated cost of the acquisition, whether by eminent domain or otherwise
of WA rights-of-way, options to purchase !and, easements, and interests in land
relating to structures, equipment, and facilities used in draining the benefitted
property;
(H) the prorated cost of the acqulsition, construction, repair, anti maintenance of
structures, equipment, and facilities used in draining the benefrttad property.,
(C) the prorated cost of architectural, engbneering, legal, sad related seMces,
plans and specil'ications, studies, surveys, estimates of coot and of revenue, and all
other expenses n or in idont to planning, providing, or determbilog the
ilea ibWty a d p y of structures, equipment, and facilities used in draining
property;
(D) the prorated cost of all machinery, equipment, fnrnltan, and facilities ntces-
swT or Incident to the provision and operation of draining the benefitted property;
(E) the prorated cost of funding and financing charges and Interoot ariaing from
construction pro*lx and the start-up met of.a drainage faeili'ty used in draining the
benefittad property;
(F) the prorated cost of debt ser toe and roam requirements of structures,
equipment, and faei}ideo provided by revenue bonds or oils drainage revsniwpledgs
eecuritiea or obiigadons boned by the municipaljty; and
(d) the administrative cats of a drainage utility systeta,
de(3) "DrWxW' n 0e btidgee, catch basin dhttoneie, oondui* craeits, culverts,
, dltcbes, draws, flumes, pipes, putnps, sloughs„ treatment works, and
appurtenaneas to those items t whether natural or artificial, or uaing force or gravity,
that an used to draw off et11 s; water from land, any the water away, eoUkt, store,
or treat the water, or divart the water into natural or artificial watercourvaL
(4) "Drainage charl*t means:
(A) the l4vy imposed to nearer the cost of the service of the muok4aiity in
furnishing drainage for say bowfitted property; sad
148
r,
§ ~OYiO4.t ,~qp~ yam'
~1" ""LAATEB 'E~-D /d
18) if specifcall WATER
an amount made is Provided by to governing body of the mu nicipalityn~ce
the municipality, funding of future drainage system ordinance,
- Sla9~
0) 'Drainage system" means the
the municipality and dedicated to there em~Owned 0.e controlled in whole or in part by Jr~ /v
siona for additions to the system Perty, includin
P 8 Provi-
(6) "Facilities" means the property, either rea), Personal, or mixed, flat 4 us
Providing drainage and included in the system. ed in
(7) "Public utillty" means a
municipality rough Muni inage service that is
cip
regularly Provided by the
benefitted pro ai
(A) p dediroperty eated to that service r the uae a he
party within the service area and that s based on:
an established schedule of charges;
(13) the use of the police power to fmplement the sei+ red and
(C) nondiscriminatory,
subchapter. reasonable, and equitable terms as declared under this
(8) "Service area" means the municipal boundaries
the and any other land arena outside
municipal boundaries which, as a result of topograPh
overland flow nto the watersheds served by the drainagey or bydrauUq, contribute
pprovided, however, that in ao event system of a
municipality
may s service area extend farther th
boundan'a of a muaicipal Ws current extnterritoria)
area of one municipality extend Into the boon lu6dktio4 an the
nor may or muaiciPallty, The service area w to be eetabltehedf la the cr ulCOfporsted service
drainage at>7rty Provided, that no rnunlci "~a°0Q establLhlo°Dng~ e'
tb manidpal boundaries except a munkipap~ shall extend a esrvice area outside of
in one or more counties of Ieea than 8gp,00b of more than 400,000 PoPulatloa logted
federal census. Popnlatios accordla6 Wthe
(9) "User" means the ^ recent
Ae+soa or eatrty who pwy or occupies a benefitted ptyaerty,
I. aadtYsdJaoe 18 I9Yl'.T~ eb. 1290, t 1% eK Aug, 28, IW, Acla LOS 72nd L491 862,
i!q Letl Nk w JUW >tlataeorr Notes
1992 ramsrdsorp a~ 9tap
4+7r N04 IWQliisg ; 442041,
f 40 H& - A&pdon of Sylont Ratan:
m (a) Sub*t to the re4~ementa In 3absec*u
by a majority vote of its entire memb"hjd (c}, the goveetrfar boo of th
an
an o p, may adopt t* +abeha
to bb a pubile~l ° ~0~0° and dint desists, the pier by
drafaaleolths oiuniefPatity
m 1P! ordtbaaoe the iuvernta= body Must fbsd'6t'
(b(1)) tbso L.t
ty will establish a acbednle of drafoaes
bf qt1a
0 the prOParb "trio awn sabjaet. to rix aJ> rest
Uft bon ymn an ~ draf wp C f r~ Ptopadyr it the
e
, and
i'fa ~w1' aads~ thin
egf~M mWeVsh7 wal oew &%int p serotes Oil . , ......,r
(c) Bifars oR.re.eoaabiry sod
adopda the ordhw
newspaper off cfrodattoa in the m 1e air bolt' inwt'pitbagk t tl dt O* hf' a
e* i ooadder the Pro Porcd ardfnana, and Dka d tl tb
The gore ProPasd otditptnee mtmt be'
of ~ ''lrsl pabaftum 7ua o(wo M as lit y~ t%~ date
1411 '
`I
WATER AND LMLITIE9 § 40 Ac$aNo.
Title lJ P Ilam___
(d) After passage of the ordinance adopting this subchapter, the munici alit m qqgg ,a
a schedule of drainage charges. The municipality must hold a notice[' of the hea r"tfilt~r / Y
charges before levying the charges, The municipality must give l0 _
the manner provided by Subsection (c). The proposed schedule of drainage charges, as O(/~
originally adopted or as revised, must be published in the notice.
(e) The municipality by ordinance may adopt and enforce rules as it considers appropri•
ate to operate the drainage utility system. Provided, however, that the prohibitions
contained in Section 212.003(a) of the Local Government Code relating to quasrzoning and
other land use regulations in the extraterritorial lurisdioion of a municipality shall apply
that any rule [may be stablished using impervious cover meas'urem ntsdrelatting tocland except
and building size.
Amended by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1230, § 1(e). eft. Aug. 28, 1989; Acts 1991, 12md Leg., ch, 862,
§ 1, eff. June 16, 1991.
Historical and Statutory Notes
Ml U violation
For validation and application provisions of the
1991 amendatory act, see torical and Statu-
tary Note following § 402.041.
¢ 402.046. Incorporation of Existing Facilities
The munklpality may incorporate existing drainage facilities, materials, and supplies
Into the drainage utility system,
Amended by Acts 1991, 72nd Leg„ ch. 862, § 1, eft. June 16, 1991,
Historical and Statutory Notes
19111 Legislation
For valldation and spplkstion provisions of the
1991 amendatory act, see Historical and Stator
wry Note following ¢ 402.041,
¢ 402.047. Drainage Charges
(a) The governing body of the municipality may charge a lot or tract of benefitted
property for drainage service on any basis other than the value of the property, but the ation basis must be directly related to dralzage and the must none levy, and a
any cla"Me and
of the beneftted properties in the municipality mu
reasonable. service (b) In setting the schedule of charges for drainage service, the governing body mites arm The
bane its body ma oa an iav ed °PIW and awbament rolls for that purpose. The
governing g body may use apprw
governing body mar aLo coaslder the land use made of tine ben, fitted P tpebw sled
governing body may oonsWer the alas, in area, and topography parod
property, is asesaloi the drainage chargs to the ply.
(c) The governing body may ft rates for drainage charges in adhtna and may change,
ad} at, and readjust the rates and charges for drainage service from time to time. The
rates must be equitable for simtlar services in all swan of the service area.
not
(d) Unless a person's lot or tract is exempted under this subchapter, the persm mays
estabEs
use the drainage system for the lot or tract unless the person pays the full,
drainage charge.
(e) Usera residing tritlila the estabiiabed service area, but outside the munk*dlIWa
boundaries, may appeal sates established for drainage charges to the Texan Water
Commission u authgtised by Section 18,018 (b) of the Water. Code,
Amended by Acts 19111,12ad Leg„ oh. U2, 11, eff, June 16, 1911E
145
a
ii
t
§ 402.047 WATER AND lrrr>9rrrteg 9a - O /o _
sn o.
Hlawrkel ana 9 nw 9
19e1 l.egfshW tatatory Note Agenda
For validation and appsMtion provuiorw of the f ilU :`f z,
1991 ameodabry act. see Historical and Sate
Wry NOW following 1402.041. /D
§ 402,048. BWingsr Depoalt Not ltequlred
(a) The municipality may bill drainage charges, identified Separately, with the mmid.
polity's other public utility billings. Any delinquent billings may be colleeted oo the
beneftted property under the procedure prescribed by thin subehaptar.
(b) The municipality may not require a deposit for drainage service as a precondition W
accepting surface flow in the dminsge utility system.
Amended by Acts 1991, 72nd 1.eg„ ch. Ab2, 11, eff, June 16, 1991.
Hlssorkal aM Stsuutory Ne4a
1eel 1,e Wau"
For validation and appllatloo provisions of the
1991 amendatory act, see Historical end statu-
tory Note following 1402.041,
4 402,049. Segregation of Income
The income of a drainage utility system must be
segregated municipal smunts. If drainage char are olfor the oos~ 4r f ser~te, the
municipality may transfer tM charges in whole or in part to the m ggeen~ee t for e
pled xc pged to retire say p n outstanding munkipn} boundaries and ~ for anypart
any t g indebtedness or obligation incurred, or as a reserve for
future construction, repair, or maintenance of the drainage System, It the goterning
body yes levied, in the drainage ebarge, an amount in coo ution to the fending of
future system improvements, Mading replacemen4 now construction, or estenaisn, that
amount is not transferable to the general fund.
I cod Jbbne Acts 1991IM, Ilst Ug.. OX 1290, 3 1(n, off. Aug. 28, 190,, Arta 1991, 72nd Law.:'Ck &W,
Hwarkw a1w 9tbhrkwy Notes
1181 Legtelatiaa
For vaiiduka and application, p -fisio" of the
1981 amendatory let, see r1i:Lrrieai std state,.
tory Note following 4 40119L
4A2.OSL Deilnaueet Charges
(a)' Any charge clue hereunder which IS not
action at law b the m ~'~f° dine may be retiovsred is an
at law or let this subehapbeeI°*t of the other penalties pmvidstF
ar1°a y p W when doe eSW msidpa6.11tow" within the "Wee, k limb ankoaNky. any telly netieft Ro+taad Dy'ths m men to tHseooWtuana of
' m u" are hereby ampow=
erect to asdoeea thin prryviebw a~tat
4-11 sqwl
e a" aocordsom wilt, thi►c hen 0 nose es. emp60 rMw the
to any bowfittod I t ea served bs the d ~ti sp pe tioea ior he
the eaforaement of t+xevlsiona ' t6ia s u i°aeei°° oyrepair or for
Amended by "1981, 72nd
,
~ ~ ~ ! 1. ~ Jags 11,,.198E••.
t ~ OA Mess L tin 19p ia~irlwy ae~
NblSriew Saw 210410607 NS60
IM lwglela M
ft V valldatioa and applies" PWWO s'ot thk
INI
Namrafdatoeywiagarta, O MMOClne and -
tory M041
....L~' .
1!~
>1
WATER AND UTILITIES A~p Q(3 7a /0
Title IS
102,061, Drsinate Revenue Bonds Agendo Item
By majority vote of the governing body, the municipality may issue revenue ~-aW- L
bonds. The municipality may use the Bond Procedures Act of 1981 (Artiee7[7k$~ ,p
Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes), In addition, the municipality may pi,-dge income received U°JJ
by contracts for the provision of drainage to other governmen.4 or governmental
subdivisions located inside or outside the service area,
Amended by Acts 1991, 72nd Leg., ch. 962, i 1, eff. June 16, 1991.
Historical and Statutory Notes
194k Legislation
For validation and application provisions of the
1991 emendatory act, see Historical and Statu-
Cory Note following 4 402.041.
§ 02,062. Discontinuation of Drainate System
(a) If, after at least five years of substantially continuous operation of a municipal
drainage system, the governing body of the municipality determines that the s stem
should be discontinued, that the powers under this subchapter should be revoked, and
that provision for municipal drainage should be made by other revenues, the governing
body may adopt an ordinance to that effect after providing notice and a public hearing as
provided by Section 402.046,
(b) If the. municipality discontinues a system under Subsection (a), it mar not adopt a
system under this subchapter for at least five yearn after the discontinuation.
(c) A discontinuation dots not affect a written obligation bxurred by the municipality
for funding or for the purchase of equipment, materials, or labor for the drainage system
that is not then fully paid or otherwise discharged,
(d) A claim for damages based on an alleged failure of the drainage system that 4 filed
with the municipality before the adoption of the ordinance discontinuing the drainage
system is not abated by the discontinuation.
Amended by Acts 1989, 11st Let„ ch. 1230,1 1(g), eff, Ans. 26, 19891 Acts 1991, 72ad Leg., ch. 862,
1 1, Of. June 18, 1981.
Hiewrkal and S4awm7 Notes
t"I L"Wation
For validation mod mppli^it!rn provisions of the
1991 amendatory set, see Hlstorkw mad State-
wry Nota following 1 4ftOIL
§ 402,063. Exemptions
(a) A governmental entity or pawn described by Subsection (b) and a lot or tract in
which the governmental entity or person holds a freehold interest may be exempt from
this subchapter and aA mdiaanoes, resolutions, and rules adopted under this subchapter,
(b) The following may be exempt:
(1) this aisle;
(2) a county,
(8) a municipality,
(4) a school, district
(c) The following sW be exempt from the provisions of any nuke or ordinanom
adopted by a munkipality puratant to this Act
(1) property with proper construction sad maintetrastes of a aloofly suffkisat and
privately owned drainage system;
(2) property held sad maintained in its usbarsl state, until such time that the property
is developed sad all of the publie Infrastructure constructed has been weepted by the
munkipality for nWnteoana; and
lt,'I
i•
`i
402.063 WATER ARID U3T e
(3) a subdivided lot, until a structure has bees built on the lot and a ceAQiH(l 1W
occupancy has been issued by the municipality having jurisdiction to Ot the n_
subchapter and declare the drainage of the municipality to be a public uQ J~
Amended by Acts 1991, 72nd Leg„ eh. 862, 1 1, elf. June 16, 1991.
Hlstorleal and Statutory Notes
1991 Legiilatyon
For validation and application provisions of the
1991 amendatory act, see Hhtarical and Statu-
tory Note following 1 402.041.
1 402064. Effect of Subchapter
Thls subchapter does not:
(1) enhance or diminish the authority of a home-mile municipality to establish a
drainage utility under Article XI, Section b, of the Texas Constitution;
(2) preclude a municipQq from utilizing mvenues, other than drainage utility
revenues, for drafaage purposes; or
(3) preclude a municipality from impaing impact, tea or other charge* for drainage
authorized by law.
Added by Aeu 1888, 71st Leg., ch. 1730; 1 1(h), off. Aug. '&B, 1909. Amended by Acts 1961, 72nd
Ieg., ch. 86$ 1 1, off. June 16, 1991.
SUBCHAPTER D. WROVEME M TO WATER AND SEWLR SYSTM
1N CERTAIN MUNICIPALITIES
1 402.061, Application of Subehapter to Certsda Itfaakipalltiee '
To exercise authority under "subehspter, a municipality moat
(1) have all or a major part of its territory in a county with a population of more than
25,000; or
(2) bs located in a county in which at least 60 percent of the told area Is, regularly
covered by water and in which is located the majority of tbs WW area of a wildlife
refuge for species of wildlife on the federal endangered speein Hat
Amended by Acts 1986, 71st lep, ch. 1, 1 88(b►, off. Aug. 28, 1989.
Idlalae4ed sad 84et1t4M7 N"a I Ad), OL Aug. 28, 1889, For eabjeoct matter
110 [ egAlstlsa of ch 266, 1 2 see 1 402.OM-
71se 1fM ameedmeot to ooeloem to Aeas 196T; Bodso gil the INS amendstosT set psa
roloool dnfgoa# I Ise i alid"d note is main ridnt.
a" (Ik AW added a" L 'This, sestina smsmds the Loeai Covarnmrot
171. Ants 1817, 70th leg„ eb. 256, 14 1,. 2 Code to conform to Seeliome 1 sod Si c1sptsr
amended Venom's Aan,Civ.SL set 1110e and 284 Arta of the 70th Isgislapun.,gagisiar See.
wen repoW by Aeta IBM, 714 lop, dh, i, sins, 1997,"
462.66 & Bkpealed by Aeta N91, 72nd Log, ch. 9% # 1, off: Key I6, Mill S
Molorkal sad 96atasnf Notre Acts 1997. 70dk"Lsp, ek 21Kj S
The resealed M= Arelated Cents 6e„ Vernon's Ann gv.St wt 111k 1 2A,
require that p v f owoen mooed their prop Acts UW 710 LW ch. 1, 1 8*6 W
erty to a estne gsLm, waa desired five;
tsar
118
t
a'R«nsy.
~i
f~
t;
agand~ Na. '"D/a
A00nde Itarrr, # 3
N10
EXHIBIT III
STORMWATER
UTIIJTY
SCHEDULE FOR AN OCTOBER I1 1993P IMPLEMENTATION
OF ESTABLISHING A STORM WATER UTILITY
(without establishing rates)
I COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION TO ESTABLISH
A STORM WATER UTILITY
April 1992
II. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION (three times)
May 1892
III. STORM WATER UTILITY ORDINANCE HEARING
(30 Days After Notification) July 1992
IV. APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A
STORM WATER UTILITY
August 1992
1
AI\STMM.CC DISK 88
r,
IC I TY
MCOUNCII
~ R oooo~Upt}p40QG0~~~; y
e A
qo c Qp`~:
O e
QO~aCy L i I-
i
Agonda No, -9c~~~1
Agenda Ilom_
Date
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 24, 1992
TO: Mayor and city council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Petition Requesting a Certificate of Interim Use from the
U.S. Interstate commerce commission
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the Mayor to
sign a petition requesting a certificate of interim use for
Missouri Pacific right-of-way from the U.S. Interstate Commerce
commission.
BACKGROUND:
The Union Pacific Railroad (UP) has notified staff that they have
requested permission from the Interstate Commerce commission to
abandon a portion of the Denton Branch railroad corridor. In order
to prevent the abandonment of the right-of-way, the City of Denton
must petition the ICC for a Certificate of Interim Use. If
granted, the certificate prevents the railroad from exercising
their abandonment .rights.
Staff is still in the process of negotiating a lease agreement with
the Union Pacific for the use of the right-of-way. We continue to
make progress. Hopefully we will be ready to present a draft
agreement to the council in the near future.
You will recall, from earlier discussions, that the UP was to
notify us of the proper time to file an interim use petition. They
gave us notice on Friday (March 20). The petition is the next step
in our efforts to preserve the existing right-of-way for use under
the provisions of the Rails-to-Trails Act.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The petition and the Certificate of Interim Use does not obligate
the City to perform or provide any services or improvements. It
merely lets the ICC know that we are interested in the property and
prevents the railroad from abandoning the right-of-way.
Please: let me know if you desire additional information on the
matter.
Agenda No. a o/v
Council Agenda Report
Resolution for Certificate of Interim Use
Page 2.
Thank you for your consideration.
Prepared Bys
9404:~ -
s ava
ss tant to the City Manager
Approved By:
Lloyd V. Harrell
City Manager
Agn~d3 No. 9a~-0/00 Agendo Ilem
oafo 7 - 0'7-
3~3
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN A PETITION REQUESTING A
CERTIFICATE OF INTERIM USE FROM THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE
COMMISSION FOR UNION PACIFIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
WHEREAS, the Union Pacific Railroad has filed a petition with
the Interstate Commerce commission requesting permission to abandon
a portion of its Denton Branch railroad; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton has an interest in preserving the
railroad right-of-way under the provisions of the Federal Rails-
to-Trails law as the preservation of that right-of-way will create
potential future recreational opportunities for the citizens of
Denton and North Central Texas; and
WHEREAS, the Interstate Commerce Commission requires that the
City petition for the issuance of a Certificate of Interim use in
order to prevent the abandonment of right-of-way; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES:
SECTION I. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign a
petition requesting the Interstate commerce commission to issue a
Certificate of Interim Use for the purposes of preserving the
railroad right-of-way proposed for abandonment by the union
Pacific.
SECTION II. That this resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992.
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY: _
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
(DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCHO CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
1.
is
i'
P
CITY
~ COUNCII
o0~pQo40QGe~~0
bhp { e OOQ -
~O ti O`er
c
QQ N r y P nti~'~
QQOOOC.n. L ~ U L ~~~'COG~~ _
~y.
aati:t~:EC~
! is
Agenda No,
Agenda Item _ C1__~.
I1ite
Xt,
I !
i February 27, 1992
I
I I
' f
Mr. Jackie Doyle
Chief Building official
~ i
City of Denton
215 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
w
Dear Mr. Doyle:
Please consider my application to participate on the Building code s
Board of Denton. I have several years of manufacturing management
and facilities management experience and would enjoy helping your
group in any way possible.
Sincerely,
i
J as G. F as
tachment
jm
f I
CITY OF DBNTON Agenda No.
BOARD APPOINTMENT INFORMATION Agenda lism_ p#,I_G
Oato
NAME I-~
~5 C~, ~~f s 517- 5(~ o -,555(0
ADDRESS PHONE NO.
(D 12. TE c l TO f~c7Ai~
CIT STATE ZIP CODE
.a Ta✓nAS 7L Zd5 - 5~ 44
N EMPLOYER
ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER PHONE NO.
nzao A 19POQ.Tno
I TE ZTP CODE
C~A I was _ Mo zo s
OCCUPATION
HAVE YOU PRIOR SERVICE ON A CITY BOARD?
IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBEt_
MANS OF CITY!
WOULD YOU HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON ANY BOARD? NO
IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE1
ON WHICH BOARD DO YOU WISH TO SERVE? ~G~lodtiy G T/IM~~~ ra r'^
STATEMENT OF APPLICANT/ A.l~ fn_•_l/,~✓L~DYGa SG~@._
.J e x ~w a~ maw c,~ Tix vah
w
~2•Z!a-9z
DATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
BOARD MEMBER ATTENDANCE POLICY
It is the policy of the City of Denton City Counoll that Members of the various
city Boards and Commissions be removed from office for lack of attendance at the
various meetings of the Boards and commission. Members may be removed on the
following basise
1. Regular Meetings. Board Members may be removed from office for three
unexoused absences during the course of one year and/or lack of attendance
at 501 of the number of regular meetings in tho year.
2. Special Called Meetinga. Board Members may be removed from office for
lack of attendance at 50i of the number of Special Called Meetings in one
year.
An unexcused absence is defined as an absence for which no advanced notification
is given and/or as doterminad by the chairman of the affected Board or
commission.
OFFICE USE ONLY!
TERM OF APPOINTMENT!
SEGINNINO ENDING
THIS APPLICATION MUST B8 PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL MEMBERS IN EXECUTIVE SESSION,
AND NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN UNTIL THE SECOND NESTING FOLLOWING THE PRESENTATION.
4
1i
HANDOUTS TO COUNCIL
AT MF.ETING OF 2-25-92
Agenda No, /p _e /D
Agenda Item Lble
MEMORANDUM
TCf Jennifer Walters, City Secretary
FROMI Jackie Doyle, Building official
DAM February 25, 1992
SUBJECTf Vacant Board Positions
Building Code Board has one regular member and one alternate
member vacancy. The regular member if possible should be an
engineer. Alternate member position has no specific requirements.
Electrical Code Board has one regular member vacancy which if
possible should be filled by a building contractor. Terry
Sch,-rtx, a building contractor is currently an alternate member
who could fill this position4 if this were done another alternate
would be needed.
Plumbing and Mechanical code Board has one vacancy and possibly
two if Bill Burley has to resign. if two positions are required
to be filled they should be filled by mechanical contraotors if
possible,
.
HANDOUTS TO COUNCIL
AT MEETING OF 2-25-92
Agenda ~Vo. 9.2 ' U ~bU ~b
POTENTIAL BOARD MEMBERS Agenda liem
14 RUSSeIl•eates - Architect 16A_ j .2
2. Fred Gossett - Builder---------------------------566-2480
3. Craig Gossett - Builder-------------------°-----566-2480
4. Gerald Stone - Architect------------------- ---387-4881
5. Allan Nelson - Architect-------------------------566-0266
6. Jim Kirkpatrick - Architect----------------------387-8182
7. Gary Bell - Builder------------------------------382-2828
8. Dave Boston - Builder 387-7752
9. Barbara Russell - Realtor------------------------566-2730
10. Robert Bell - Plumber-Master---------------------382-5360
11. Dan Coward - Plumber-Master---------- 565-1010
Tommy Davis - Builder----------------------------382-8921
13. Bobby Jones - Builder 382-3124
14. Bill McCarty- Builder 566-1599
15. Wayne Smith - Builder----------------------------566-3369
a.6. Mike Davis - Builder-----------------------------387-2592
17. Russell Madden - Electrician Master--------------383-3939
18. Kenneth Keese - Electrician Master--------------- 387-6050
19. Meyer Insulation----------------------------"----566-1707
20. John Adami - Builder/Realtor------------------- 565-9902
21. Emory Groanig - Builder--------------------------382-9931
22. Frank Cunningham - Plumber/HVAC------------------- 382-0367
23. Michael Howard - Architect-----------------------387-0855
24. Tom Bunger - DISD/Master Electrician-------------387-8194
25. Temple Holt - TI/Master Electrician--------------387-6419
26. Lyle Whitworth - Master Electrician--------------387-7120
27. Drue Mosley - Master Plumber---------------------383-2422
28. Bob Jones - Builder------------------------------ 382-3124
29. Dale Irwin - Developer--------------------------- 566-0033
30. John Allen - Builder 566-1899
• 4,
Agenda.No. "w
Agenda Items d-
Date ' - /
c "~JL / 6t✓~~
r a
t Agonda No, %02 D /!3
1 Agendallem-
Date y1/
r
I w
CJ~ a
JY"
l
CITY OF DENTON
BOI i APPOINTMENT INFORIMJITEON agEOtlaHem r /
Agenda No. o '{,IO ✓ " / J
Agenda Ilem_ _ ~C~ G
1 N DaIA
ni 40 A,
AD --30 1 n ONE ILI
CITY STATE ZIP ODE
p ~L 76 2,n
NAMIr OP EMELCi R
AES > JiPL YEA PH NE
STATEL ZI C DE
QCCUPATION %
HAVZ YOU PRIOR SERVICE ON A CITY BOARD? `-ham
Il YES, PLEASE DE;3CRIBEt
MANX OF CITYt
WOULD YOU HAVE A CONFLICT OF IVTZMT ON ANY BOARD?
It YZJ # PLLUB DESCRIBE t
ON WHICH SOAAD DO YOU WISH TO SEAVZ?
STAI NT OF APPLI o,r
00 iA .1 n
J o-n d _ .
s
~ e
DATE SIGNA U Or APPLICANT
i0At30 la is Amrearrs "lqu
1t is tke Nlley of tke city a colter city commit tut mmbwro to me
Vinous elty ' Wards amd CeBmleRlurs bo re"'ed free 099100 for leak of
attordame at this walors sptials o9 this Weeds a w Ceals410ns. Karbers may
be restored 04 tM fouawieg Masao
i
to "g ftstigS .L Ward members may be rested feast o991a0 fes
Fee w ww a&boom"$ durluf the me" of one year sad/er lack
of 0U*darae at fat a the mustbr of regular meetings jr, thi0 roar.
30 1010- 914hod beard Nnbera Bay be rammed tram Gifts*
&,mm as u a arse as faa of ya a~rber a#.- so",t" Called : 4% :
rwim"t in osw rear.
As ursseueed aboomae is dofibif as aB ahiance too whisk mo edrureod
nekillaatles is guest and/me as dt.44ML4e4 by 00 Chialrsf, of %VA 49904904
lewd K Calmlosiemi
USE
TZRN Or APPOI YDPi.Xmt ;:..,,rt
g , INlt . !tD Y
THIS APPLICATI(*;:-[IST BX,I,PRESEMO TO ~*TEZ COUNCIL dERS TN
ZXE.UTIVB SCSSr644i AND NO ACTION WILL
!MELTING IO.LLOWiNG THE PRESENTATION. BH Tun UNTIL THZ SECOND
. 410/A
s
Agenda OF DENTON No.
BOJ~i APPOINTMENT INFORMAT9$btaitem
Agenda No.
c: /1-Aliplitil HAM
P9 NE
ITY STATE ` :1
,arc ZIP 0Da
NAME OF ENpL YER c c r
ADDRESS OP E1J L0 YXR c
CITY STATE 7C `
p ~ DE
iTPATION .L___„_.
HAVE YOU PRIOR SERVICE ON A CITY BOARD? N G
IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE=
NAME OF CITY
W=D YOU RAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON ANY BO
IF Yu s PLEASE DESCRIBE 2 ARD?
ON WRICX BOARD DO YOU Klan TO SERI PLyn,, n~ J ?rI >,Rtf/.I
STATEMENT Of APPLZ
rr I! 't/ fCAW, •i ir. I• 'W /rat •QS ~C ~ 7S.
...J 6,- 1
.l hr)Il. r ` /9a. '.o. c ~p •v .i ,
DATE
SIGMiATM of APPLICANT
lm_ifO01~i A1'Plll~f`. r...•••• f
It is too volley of the Clty at "ales Clty Csanell tAat
easlou Olty ' baudo asd Commlrsloms be ramovad lrow o!!le wloieelaek e!
rttondaw• at the rarlws m•ottago at the boards A" COwANdIOM. MMb•te may
b• romw•d as 4" lOliwi" baoto,
1. baadla_.r
.~ei~s'~"ass• so"d my be 94 91 item o/lion for
of attrmdammo at Sao as tbo =Lv oo g"I" at 004 f rgmiar moottails is type roag.
7o fa•mla& Called K"kine■ board Nombora say be ru Ned lr" a!llaa
r o as • sees at lot at am muabor as b
*ia"age is me yore. owlal Called
am umoaomood -6 -148 to deltmod u am oMomeo !or Wbleb 00 ah•ma•d
notlllwtlem to dlry amd/or as deteralaod by Us Cbalrsu at the ajlwt•d
8"1 ar Comaloslon,
TEM6M OF APPOINTMENT!
B INNIN
IRIS APPLICATION MUST BE PRESENTED TO TEE C N
EXECUTIVE SESSIONO AND NO ACTION WILL as TAM tyRT L Tu WjWZpj IN
MEETING FOLLOWING TBE PRESENTATIONo
SECOND
• 6I04A
lgentla No, -2 'iL ~
Agonda No CITY OF DENTON
.
Agenda APPOINTMENT INFORMATIONvAda Item 64 S
ftem.._---r~-c
Date Y2'<<~'
NAB ~!v 3 ~ 3 3 W~~
ADDRES ¢
ONE
STTETEf y~ ZIP ODE
NAME OF OVER
ADD SS 0 EMPLO R
ITY NE ! ~
STATE LL
..CGTPJITIO - ZIP ODE
RAVE YOU PRIOR SERVIC,;; ON A CITY BOARD? Q
IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE, 5..~
NANX OF CITYr ~
WOULD YOU SAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON ANY SOAK? All/
IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE,
1-ll.
ON WHICH BOARD DO YOU WISE TO SERVE? ~8TJI1.~
STAT NT OF AP LI r t
J
DATE
zcrr T P I '
HAAD rOlJ4R,1 ATrzwnA..r.
tt is !ho Policy ot the city a! Daaton City Council that Merbers o! the
""taus City 'Boards and Coarissions be raaoved leor elfice !oe lack e,
attendance at the venous reetings o! %be Bosrde and Coaslsalons. Ma+bers my
b• rerrvad an the fetlorla~ basis,
3' s 1 ,e n Board keebors may
uaeseuse a ence■ during the ayoYbe p ad frog olllaa for
e! sttendaaoe at 501 0! the auaber of 1 year and/or lank
eqular rsetingo In the year.
led M••tlna• Board Merberr MAY be reravad lras c!!!aa
,Metle~s la
ateaa sacs at 50t og w nurbel e! Bpeolal called
An ono yeae.
no Y "'t'joa'd alt nee is defined a an absence for vhlah no adwnoed
rd ofet is olws and/ee as dote= Red by the Chatrsya of the a!laoeed
Beard or Caalesion,
I OSE
TERM OF APPOINTMENT,
MUST BEGINNING ENDING
THIS APPLICATION
EXECUTIVE SESSION BE PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL AND No MUTING FOLLOWING ~ E PRES A ION ILL MERE 8 IN
SECOND
rFEB 990 6104A
T1. n- t !
' r
Agenda No
CITY 01° DENTON Agendaltem GCiS / C' /
BOl i APPOINTMENT INFORMATION
_V_016 tale
r Agenda No.
GQSC j
. ?/1n155EN ¢ ~f C/ `5
G l
J NAME `Y/3 &X CREEK C.9' Iblo - 3 $2-039 2
ADDR DEIJ'rpN. 7`Eh~}s P762
ITY STATE ZIP CODE
DELTA Az2 LTNES ZNG.
NAME Or EMP DYER % .
D4"IS PF WooeTw rAiv. otsefPoRr ZJ4 -s-2 Y - 2.2-1,7 R 'J
ADD~F'EMIPLOYER 7-X
F ONX
TY STATE zip CODE
MTAS,tcrNE RICO r _
HAVE YOU PRIOR SERVICE ON A CITY BOARD? YES Sor vctY 4oN6 'Aft
IT YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE: ?ct1NNP4(e CoMot1jcNooL LE - dwPVs
NAME Or CITY s jean Ck N RS
WOULD YOU RAVE A CONFLICT Or INTEREST ON ANY BOARD? NO
IF YZB, PLEASE DESCRIBE,
ON 1BICE BOARD DO YOU ARSE TO SZRVZ7 T-oiV0 r fL4NAISAI& 47-HE+t &000$ $
STATEMENT Or APPLICANTS 'M XWIF9 7[0 roJ vac v6o0NMtNT AW ri"
S I'142 MAYox 0 -s W VF so M
r gr* rw M N ' k AOMi
kV &IWCEP ;W rW
C t Re s A 7D
6v$
r4NV TMCWV73 /Mtvr' /D r1GbP1Nb R"M .L, /701y ~ it 194/
DATS r SI=AT Or AAPLICAWT
AND smash kmNa IC! AguQ
tt is ww policy et km City at twat" City C•wwii tAat "abets of ems
various City 'le"As sad Convotasicas be conaved 9940 office got lack of
atsww4aae at aw vsries• mattis*e ad tb• Beards and Omissions. Memoirs may
be tea►vd on the 9ousivi" basis$
10 Bssatla~Ngetlm4 least SSarbeto may be removed from oftles tot
Stso u0oaaua• a omega during %be tvurso ad am y4at sad/et last.
•t aneadasa• at 144 et Uw tumor et toraa9 asetlmfa is Me year.
3. Madtirigo, Bcrd ngrbNCa ray be toggled fire oftise
• ar a lace 4% Sst •t w Names of special Called
Mse"afs is aw lost.
As w*x4v4ed absoase is d•fisod as as abeelw* for vbisb se advaec*d
mati9iostise is pilrws asd/•c as dotorrlad by Uw chairs" at t" attested
Board ga CeriasieNo
OFFICE USE ONLYS
TZRN Or APPOINTNENTs
B INNIN ENDING
TBIS APPLICATION MUST BE PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL NEWERS IN
xxxoTIVE SESSION, AND NO ACTION WILL am !Aj= UNTIL TRZ SECOND
MWING IOLLOARNG THE PRESENTATION.
6104A
s
CITY OP DENTON Agenda 1Jo.
B0111 APPOINTMENT INrOFMATIM~UondajjmmZC_~
Agnnda No, _L. -j /D D110
Agenda 11am 6'
AD 8 % 0~ IT PS NZ
? G o
TTY STATZ ZIP C_.
NAM OF EMPLOYER
AD 847 LMPLOYLR PRONZ
CITY ST~ /sTATZ 'I( ZIP DE
V Ltd •VP.- /Ira ~r R/7~ o z
il.
OCCUPATION
RAVS YOU PRIOR SZRVICZ ON A CITY BOARD? Jt•'t
IF YZSo PGZASR DESCRIBES
NAM OF CITYS
WOULD YOU RAVE A CONFLICT OF INTERZST ON ANY BOARD? 'OVi~
IF Yu f MASS DESCRIBES
ON NSiCS BOARD DO YOU KISS To SERVZ? ✓ - .f~
STATEMENT OF ASPLI S 4A V
r
DATE Q Ta Or >P iT
moaao N 11, ATnuoara POLICT '
tt is the Polley of tM city et berates City Ceemeii tact Nmmbere et th
varleus City 'Nana OW Caesluiomm be reawved Ives ettlae let Saab e
attowanee at tae vesiema meatimta st the beards amt Comm/aalone. Nasbaa may
be YamwN es tae teLlorlaq basics
16 beard members may w rammved item ettleo lee
roe emeseu a wade CYri toe ONE" at one year and/ee isea
ot. attemtamse at us et tae aYMet e1 rgmiat "Wass is the year.
beard Hemims may be removed lees ettiee
e, as a we as fns ed um mum bet at CPerlal C61144
Mawls~d La an year.
N mmemameed Abdo" is Mlimad as as atwmae tot wbleb as ahaneet
1Mtltleation is taws ad/et u detarm/nel by tael CbAlrsam e9 the alteetst
Mart or Csmstsdism.
OFTICI SR Yr
TZIN OF APPOINTIINT t
B INNIN
TS%S APPLICATION MUST IS PRNSZNTED TO TSZ COUNCIL XMZRS IN
ZXZCUTIV8 SZSSION, AND NO ACTION WILL IS TARN UNTIL TSZ SRCOND
MZZTING rOLLOWINd THZ PAUSNTATION.
410/A
I
V
LAW C+W'Tf DB /S lD /D
HOWARD F„ WATT, Agenda No.
AITOMBY3 Atb COI7NSFLOPS AT LAW AW Agenda (lam_
}IDWARD 9. WATT' We ✓
BDLLOVII.BSS
MIXli 11c Mlll, F.V 1108 Y. IaUS T
DPMON, TPXAS 76201
817087 OM!
MRTR021034-M30
March 11, 1992 PAX 817/M34152
Judith Abbott, Chairman
Historic Landmark Commission
The Texas Building
100 W. Oak
Denton, TX 76201
Dear Judith:
I ha!re recently been given the o
work for the City of Denton on a contracttbasis,toIdhavemlearned
that it is a violation of the City Charter of Denton for me to do
wor:c for the City of Denton (even as an independent contractor)
while holding a position on a City Board. Unfortunately, I am
going to have to resign my position on the Historic Landmark
Commission. Because I have been asked to begin work on a case
immediately, this resignation is effective as of this date.
I have really enjoyed working on this Commission with you and
the other members. I am a staunch supporter of the goals of the
Commission and the Historic District. My support will not end even
though I must give up my position on the Commission, itself.
Please let me know if I can be of assistance to the Commission in
any manner on any project in the future.
Thank you.
Ve y truly yours,
,t
Howard E . 4a t
HEW/bc
r
#BOARD LTRTf1n..b PAMn,Y LAW ITIXAS BOARD op 1.BOAI, SI7ICI,URATIDY