Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-28-1992 Agond.i No. ~2 - J Aganda CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Dalb. APRIL 28, 1992 / Special Call Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, April 28, 1992 at 5115 p.m, in the Civil Defense Room of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered) 5115 p.m. 1. Receive a report and hold a discussion with Michael Morris from !.North Central Texas Council of Governments regarding membership to the Regional Transportation Committee and review the riew Intermodal Service Transportation and Efficiency Act. 2. Receive a report and hold a discussion with the Parks and Recreation Board concerning results of neighborhood meetings regarding the 1986 Bond Program and consider a recommendation as to how to proceed, 3. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding possible funding for engineering studies for the southern extension of thu runway at the Municipal Airport and give staff direction. 4. Receive a report and hold a discussion concerning Fred Moore Park. 5, Continue a discussion regarding the zoning and platting process and standards and give staff direction, 6. Receive a report and hold a discussion concerning the status of contract negotiations with the Upper Trinity Regional Water District, 7. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. 81 New Buainess This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas, 9. Executive Sessions A. Legal Matters Under Sec, 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec, 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec, 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T,S, 1. Discuss personnel matters and duties of the City Manager, the City Attorney, and the Municipal Judge as related to the operation of Municipal Court. e Aponda Item__ City of Denton City Council Agenda April 28, 1992 a Page 2 10. Official Action on Executive Session Itemst A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments NOTEt THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT IS LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE. C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of (P.M ) 1992 at o'clock (a.m.) CITY SECRETARY NOTEt THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IS ACCESSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 566-8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX SO THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE. AMM00132 CITY CQUNG oooa0 P o s tl ~ w O r + ~t iJN tt Agenda Nu, Agonda Ilona `1 7M Date 8 9z ciryof DENrON,TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE{A17) 566.8307 O/Noe of the CIly Manager NlEMORANDiJM TOt Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager FROM3 Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager DATEt April 23, 1992 SUBJECTt Michael Morris On Tuesday evening, Michael Morris, Director of Transportation for North Central Texas Council of Governments, will be with us. We have asked him to come to discuss two items. One, the Regional Transportation Committee (RTC) and the importance of it and our nomination of a Council Member to it, Secondly, the Intermodal Surface Transportation and Efficiency Act of 1991 (the now highway bill), The federal government has specific funding categories in this new bill that could relate to several projects that the city is currently pursuing. Michael will talk about these new funding categories and the criteria for obtaining funding from them. We would be happy to try and get any information the Council might want p to the meeting. Please call us at your convenience, Rick Svehla Deputy City Manager RStbw AMM00137 I CITY -COUNCII O~~~OpQa o4' 0#41 A~ IN pO ' ° o oa 0 O .v ~ O oo~bQ~QQC GG00~~~~~ r 'i CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Use of Parks and Recreation Bond Punds RECOMMENDATION; Receive a recommendation from the Park Board regarding the expenditure of bond funds, SUMMARY; The Park Board has conducted numerous neighborhood meetings to get the opinions of our residents on how these funds should be spent, BACKGROUND; In 1986, the City passed a bond issue which approved tho construction of three recreation canters. One of these has been constructed and $2.7 million remains to be spent on the remaining facilities. Options for the expenditure of those funds have been solicited and reviawed by the Park Board, i PROGRAMSo DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED; Parka and recreation users will be affected by this decision. FISCAL IMPACT: Additional operation and mnintpnance costs will be associated with the option that is adopted. RESPECT LY S~JED: Lloyd Harrell City Manager ared ame Steve Brinkman Title Diregt of Parka and Recreation Appr~~~ 1 j1A Title 2b33C/3 t, i Agenda PIo.. ~.-g / Agenda item ltls - Dale CITY o/ DBNrON, rEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 M E M O R A N D U M _ = = = _ _ _ _ TOt Dalton Gregory and Members of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board FROM: Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation DATE: April 20, 1992 SUBJECT: Conclusion from Neighborhood Meeting - 1986 Bonds Funds After conducting six open meetings to receive citizen input on the remaining $2.7 million in 1986 Bond Funds, it is apparent there is little public support for the option of developing a community center with or without a natatorium at this time. Therefore, the following report is submitted for your consideration. T. Summary of major points from neighborhood meetings • Strong support for the acquisition and development of park land first in South Denton then in the Northeast. • Provide basic park facilities like those at Avondale for neighborhood use including playgrounds, trails, picnic facilities, restrooms, and ballfields, particularly in South and Northeast Denton. • Defer construction of recreation centers until an appropriate level of funding is available for construction, operation, and maintenance. • Support to p:.aovide development in areas of the City as approved in 1986 Bond Program. • Maintain facilities properly once they are constructed. 11. Philosophical direction based on input from neighborhood meetings • Land acquisition that will accommodate future recreation centers is essential in the South and Northeast. ii konde No Agonda Item,, (LS' *.Z April 20, 1992 Page - 2 i Promote acquisition and development of neighborhood parks rather than at centralized, community-wide facilities. • Basic park development (i.e. Avondale) should be provided at all future neighborhood park sites. Maximize park acquisition and development through state matching grants. • Incorporation of citizen input from additional neighborhood meetings into Comprehensive Master Plan as it is developed. III. Next Steps for Implementation of 1986 Bond Funds. • First, investigate availability of land in south Denton and identify appropriate tracts for park development. • second, investigate availability of land in Northeast Denton and identify appropriate tracts for park development. • Acquire land for park use after a;,proval from Park Board and City Council. • Conduct additional neighborhood meetings to solicit input for South and Northeast park site Master Plans. • If land is acquired, submit grant application in July 1.992 for park development to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department where deemed feasible. • Reserve 'remaining portion of bond fund for recreation center construction. The Park Board would recommend reserving a portion of the bond funds for the future construction of two recreation centers. (This construction would require additional funding through a future bond program.) Depending on the timing, the amount which is used to acquire a park site and the intial development may be doubled by leveraging those funds with a matching grant from the Texas Park and Wildlife, Local Park Fund. At the Board's direction, staff will fast track the grant application to the state for its next review oycle beginning in July, 1992. If approved, the City could fund two park development projects per year through this program. Honda No. •L)Z Agenda Itom_ ![J S °2! Wto y ~ ~3 April 20, 1992 Page - 3 IV. Other Major Considerations • Renovation of Civic Center Pool ($1,000,400) may be most effectively addressed through other funding sources to insure a prompt response to this need. If funding is requested through a matching grant as originally proposed, any construction could not be actualized until the 1994 swimming season. In addition, any application for the pool would be in competition with other park development grants that the city expects to submit for South and/or Northeast Denton. s North Lakes Road Extension to Bonnie Brae to alleviate traffic problems in that neighborhood ($130,000) is recognized as•a significant issue , although it is not identified for funding in the current North Lakes Park Development. Renovation of Denia and North Lakes centers (minimum $1000000 per center) is another critical need which was highlighted by the inadequate space and equipment to properly conduct the neighborhood meeting at North Lakes. • Increased maintenance of current park facilities • Expansion of amenities at existing neighborhood parks to provide facilities similar to the Avondale Park development Even though there was little support for the options pi,esented these meetings were a great opportunity for staff to listen to citizens from every neighborhood express their recreational needs and expectations of the City. Citizens showed their active interest and support of expanded park services by their attendance at the mestingm and the issues discussed. In addition to the Band program, citizens commented several times that a stronger Park Donation policy is needed and that the City needed to make a much stronger commitment to properly maintain facilities once they are built. With the direction and approval from the Park Board and City Council, staff will initiate the next phase of implementation of fthe--1,986 Bond Program. ~r dte Brinkman AJJ0032F A~anrla roc. ya ~ ~~y .w Agontla Itorn PARRS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING ib,, f~3 MONDAY, APRIL 20, 1992 at r, ,r ~ .•-.t ~1 5:30 P.M. SENIOR CENTER MEMBERS PRESENT: Dalton Gregory, Chairman Tom Judd, Vice Chairman Burkley Harkless Catherine Bell Direct STAFF PRESENT: SettseMvicenandxEconomic Development municipal Steve Brinkman, Director of Parke and Recreation Bob Tiokner, Superintendent of Farks Alicia Mentell, Superintendent of Leisure Services Janet Simpson, Park Planning Coordinator Joy Hesch, Administrative Secretary GUESTS ORES NT: Rhonda°collister, Denton Jaycees David Hiott, Denton Record-Chronicle Carla Pride, Student at TWU Representatives of Township II Nei.ghborhood Association I nr r xn m0 ORDER The n+eeting was called to order by Dalton Gregory, chairman. NGS MRFRI T~trrxS FROM PREVIdUa II, AP ROVA dF M on a motion by Catherine Bell, second of Tom Judd, the ~min tua o the 1992, were app' meetings of March 23, 1992, and April 2, For the convenience of the guests present, Dalton amended the agenda to begin with other items. III. ,namftER ITEM Christopher Hall, a Ph.D• student at the University of North Texas, stated that be heard had there was money available the establi hment of ab d sc golfmcourse parks, and he wanted to propose cost effective and is extremely in Denton. He said it would be very and require goif.thitewoulde is attract popular in other areas. The necessary in other sports such pas tennis not is participants of all ages. Mr. Dalton asked how much land would be needed for the golf course. s said normally about would Ball stated that a edisc olf course can be rwise. Another representativer would not be used ath run five sores is needed for the . It w uld t ke an aver.are of one and from 1,500 to 6,000 linear feet. a half hours to o play L6 holes. The only maintenancguHeeaddedlthat mowing and the course can be designed to fit the park. about 90 people where participation is very limited on tennis courts, can participate on a disc golf course at tone he advantages is that ptayed can on the same basis as regular golf, One of be played as an individual game, as a partner is not always necessary. Agonda No...__LP~ 'Q~T Acdunda Item._ llJS Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting We April 20, 1992 Pagr - 2 The cost to establish the course would cost approximately $3,000 for nine holes and $12,000 for an 18 hole lirse. The cost to an individual to participate is minimal when compar, to regular golf. Mr. Hall said the game had also been included in the Pepsi Games. Bob asked if they knew if Pepsi or other companies sponsor courses. Mr. Hall said that it may be possible to get sponsors for the different toles on the course. Dalton asked if there were any others present who would like to speak to the board. Don Leander of Township 11 Neighborhood'Association said he would like to make a statement to the Board. Mr. Leander said he had talked with Janet Simpson several times with the idea of trying to get landscaping along Piney Creek so that it can be used for walking/jogging/biking rather than having to use the streets in the area. Their suggestions for development would require low maintenance and they have volunteers that would maintain the property. They were asking for funding for heavy equipment to move the rocks, etc. Dalton said that it would seem when rocks are to be moved, it would involve the drainage. Janet said any development would have to be approved by planning, Engineering, and Utilities with regard to the floodplain. Dalton asked if the staff has looked at costs involved such as engineering and staff time. Janet said that staff's major concern, as far as developing a trail, was to look at the configuration and available space. To build a trail for public use would require careful consideration and study to make sure the trail met all safety standards and that it was not too narrow and too close to the creek to obstruct the drainage. Mr. T,eander said they had considered the drainage and felt it would probably improve drainage. Bob Tickner suggested that Bill Angelo of community services may be able to do the heavy equipment work. Janet said a meeting should be set up with Mr. Angelo and the neighborhood association. Janet said the next step to take would be to investigate the possibility of securing a donation of land from the bank for a neighborhood park. Dalton commented that it sounded like a great opportunity to work with a neighborhood group. Rhonda Collister of the Denton Jaycees asked the Board to consider the Jaycees request for permission to sell beer at the Just Hoop It Tournament at North Lakes Park the last weekend in May. She said the department would realize approximately $1,000 plus the Jaycees would renovate the volleyball courts which they had originally installed. Information had been provided to Steve regarding the plans for security and liability requirements. Dalton said the request would be included on the next agenda as an action item. Nondo No, Agonda ltarn and and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting Lute April 20, 1992 am/ 3 Page Tom Judd stated that a packet of information regarding playground equipment had been given to him at the public meeting at North Lakos Recreation Center. The concept was to gat the community involved in building and designing play areas as opposed to Parks going out and putting in a playground. Tom thought it would be worth exploring. Wood is used in the construction and would have a 25 year lifespan. Bob said that the playground equipment he had observed that was made out of wood does not hold up well in this part of the country. Janet said she was aware of a park that had used this type of equipment and that it may be worthwhile to visit the park and talk to the departments who maintain the equipment. IV. ACTIONS ITEMS A. Connider Information Received at Neighborhood Meetings Regarding the Implementation of 1986 Bond Funds. (Steve Brinkman) Steve referred to a memo that had been provided to the Board which was a synopsis of the six neighborhood meetings held to receive citizen input on the remaining $2.7 million in 1986 bond funds. The summary of major points from the meetings is as followse • Strong support for the acquisition and development of park land, first in South Denton and then in Northeast Denton. • Provide basic park facilities like those at Avondale Park for neighborhood use including playgrounds, trails, picnic facilities, and ballfields, particularly in South and Northeast Denton. ♦ Defer construction of recreation centers until an appropriate level of funding is available. • Support to provide development in areas of the City as approved in 1996 bond program. • Maintain facilities property once they are constructed. Philosophical direction based on input from neighborhood meetings: ♦ Land acquisition the, will accommodate future recreation centers is essential in the South and Northeast. Promote acquisition and development of neighborhood parks rather than at centralized, community-wide facilities. ♦ Basic park development, i.e, Avondale, should be provided at all future neighborhood park sites. • Maximize park acquisition and development through State matching grants. i ij E` Agenda No. Aganda item 445 - Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting ale,_~ April 20, 1992 Page - 4 • Incorporation of citizen input from additional neighborhood meetings into Comprehensive Master Plan as it is developed. The next steps for implementation of the 1986 bond funds would be: • First, investigate availability of land in South Denton and identify appropriate tracts for park development. • Second, investigate availability of land in Northeast Denton and identify appropriate tracts for park'development. • Acquire land for park use after approval from Park Board and city council. • Conduct additional neighborhood meetings to solicit input for South and Northeast Park Site Master Plans. • If land is acquired, submit grant application in July of 1992 for park development to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department where deemed feasible. Other major considerations includes • Renovation of Civic Center Pool ($1,000,000) may be most effectively addressed through other funding sources to insure a prompt response to this need. If funding is requested through a matching grant as originally proposed, any construction could not be actualized until the 1994 swimming season. In addition, any application for the pool would be in competition with other park development grants that the city expects to submit for South and/or Northeast Denton. • Creation of a new road in North Lakes Park accessing Bonnie Brae in the northwest portion of the park to alleviate traffic problems in that neighborhood ($130,000) is recognized as a significant issue although it is not identified for funding in the current North lakes Park Development. • Renovation of nenia and North Lakes Centers (minimum of $100,000 per center) is another critical need which was highlighted by the inadequate space and equipment to properly conduct the neighborhood meeting at North Lakes. • Increased maintenance of current park facilities. • Expansion of amenities at existing neighborhood parks to provide facilities similar to the Avondale Park development. Dalton asked the Board members if they felt the statemenL accurately represented the tone of the meetings. C ~i agenda No. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting Aponda Item April 20, 1992 Late Page - 5 Tom Judd said he was speaking as one who had attended all the meetings and the statement sounded very close to his perception of the meetings. Burkley had attended the meeting at Wilson and what he had heard at that meeting was the need for park land in South Denton. Catherine said she had attended one meeting which was at Wilson Elementary and had heard the same as Burkley. She asked how long it would take to acquire the land. Betty said the City would need to inventory what land is available, investigate the purchase prices, receive direction from the Park Board as to an appropriate site, and then enter into negotiations. Steve said that is a priority, and if the Park Board and Council approves it, work will begin soon on the acquisition of land. Burkley asked if money for land was included in the bond issue. Betty said that money for land acquisition had been included in the bond but not as a specific line item. An amount of at least $200,000 had been suggested for land acquisition as a part of the two recreation centers development. At the time of the bond. election, staff had hoped that land would be donated as sites for the centers. This was at a time when there was strong development in the area. Dalton said it was his understanding that the Park Donation Policy would be used as a part of the platting process. Betty said the city has a Development Review Committee. When someone is planning a development, all the key members of the departments who have something to do with the development work with the individuals who are putting the development together. In the course of the discussion, they are supposed to identify an appropriate ratio of park donated policy relative to the site development. There have not been any ma'joi developments since the Park Donation Policy was put in place. Dalton asked if a development had to be so large before the policy would take effect. Steve said the policy gave the City the ability to ask for land or fees in lieu of land based on the size of the development. Bob said the policy gave the developer a choice of giving fees in lieu of land based upon one quarter of one percent of the construction value. That is due upon payment of building permit fees. Bob stated that this was optional. Dalton asked if any money had been received and what was meant by optional, Bob replied that the policy was not mandatory. t Aponda No. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting Agendaltem 4646 April 20, 1992 Da to _ -Wj Page `-In developing the polioy, Betty said staff had worked with developers over a period of several months at which time the developers had been very vocal. regarding the park on voluntary. Throughout the process, the developers insis eid thatiif staff could work with them that the city would get much more land i through a voluntary park donation policy than would be realized on a mandatory basis. Betty said that it was unfortunate that this came at the time of the downturn in development. i Bob said that if land had been secured through a voluntary policy, it could be used for a matching grant. If the land had been received on a mandatory basis, the state would not consider it for a matching grant. Dalton said his sense of the input received at the meetings was to stick with the conbept of the bond package of developing two sites, one in the south and one in the northeast. He recommended putting in boldface print the last paragraph of the memo from Steve to the Board which refers to the Park Donation Policy, He also recommended requesting a maintenance crew in the 199293 to handle any new acreage. It was recommended that an amendment be included in Item I of the memo in the third bullet statement. It should read, "Defer construction of recreation centers until an appropriate level of funding is available for construction and operation and maintenance.tl In addition, restrooms should be included as a basic park facility in Item 1, bullet statement 2. Tom moved that the Park Board recommend the Parks and Recreation Department move ahead with the staff recommendations if approved by Council. Burkley seconded the motion, and the motion was passed with a unanimous vote. Dalton suggested that the minutes of the neighborhood meetings, copies of the newspaper articles, and the flyers be included in the backup which is to be provided to council. He said he believed that a comprehensive effort was made to inform the community, to d evelop a dialogue, and in the long run, a lot of light was shed on the the staff in Hae also said that he the preparations for the meetings. V. 0=-Q S_?ON IT .Mfi None. VI. INFORMATIONAL ITPM~ None. VII. ADJO N The consensus of the Board was that the meeting should be adjourned. 4 4 k agenda No..~¢~ Aganda Ham_fZOS PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS APRIL 8, 1992 THROUGH APRIL 18, 1992 i *Attached are the synopsis of each neighborhood meeting. The presentation of options vary from one meeting to the next. Please ensure that you are referring to the appropriate options is you review the minutes. ,r ~r Nanda No, on~illam Minutes for Public Meeting th for Parks and Recreation Department c April s, 19920 11:00 a.m. ~1l~ is Denton Senior Center man, Denton Senior Center Advisory Board: George Holden, Chair Staff: Betty McKean, Executive Director for Municipal Services and Economic Development Recreation stave tf Park e Planning Coordinator Janet Simpson, Guests is Citizens 2.7 millioni presentation expenditure meeting for a piof essenttion on the options for the 1986 Bond funds. Option As Renovation and Expansion of North Lakes Recreation Center Renovation of Denia Recreation Center Renovation of Civic Center Pool Natatorium in conjunction with the D.I,S.D. Option Bt Renovation and Expansion of North lakes Recreation center Recreation center Renovation of Denia Renovation of Civic Center Pool option C: Two Recreation Centers The citizens were asked for their comments or suggestions, Comments: the ♦ Will there be a walled concrete diivisitoon betwehei air recreation pool and competitive pool col will have temperature? According to Steve Brinkman, the p controlled be no walls betiween e pools. in the pools, but there will ♦ will the Civicen include an pwould be o for swim meats? Steve Brinkman said the pool 25 meters in length, ♦ Since the Renovation of the civic center includes extra parking spaces, will Civic center park land be used for the parking spaces? Steve Brinkman indicated that the on-street mentioned will the problem n of n visibility built. be corrected. 7 f 2 Agenda No. Agenda ltom April 8, 1992 D316 Page - 2 13 ; 0 What other amenities will be built with the Renovation of th,: Civic Center Pool? Will it include basketball courts an: indoor pool? The renovation will be done in phases. In the first phase, the pool would be reconfigured into a facility similar to the one at Wet In Wild which is a zero-depth pool. Zero-depth means that the pool will be sloping much like a beach. No plans were made to include basketball courts and an indoor pool as a part of the renovation of the Civic Center Pool. AJJ0032C } D©~ Agenda No. ya - d / A Fr ; 6 , 19 cl z 110 Agenda llttem culo SIGN IN SHEET CITY OF DENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS N ~ ADDRESS TELEPHONE ...77 L J / ~6 ,-q g jjA At- O S -3 2 q 2. 5 4_-eoZ' z' Z24 1J lip (~4uoev '616 l Q ~ bb 3 i i~ mgwfa No. A(lentla Ilgm__ S v~ Minutes of Public Meeting of the Parks and Recreation Department's;` April 9, 1992, 7:00 p.m. f Trinity United Methodist church Board: Tom Judd, Vice Chairman, Parke and Recreation Advisory Board Staffs Betty McKean, Executive Director for Municipal Services and Economic Development Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation Janet Simpson, Park Planning coordinator Luisa Rodriguez, Secretary Guests: 28 citizens Steve Brinkman initiated the public meeting with a brief }presentation on options for the expenditure of $2.7 million of bond funds, Option At Renovation and Expansion of North Lakes Recreation center Renovation of Dania Recreation center Renovation of Civic Center Pool Natatorium in conjunction with the Denton independent School District option Bs Renovation and expansion of North lakes Recreation Center Renovation of Dania Recreation Center Renovation of Civic Center Pool option cs Two Recreation Centers Steve then relinquished the floor to Tom Judd who explained how the Park Board members arrived at the options presented by Steve Brinkman. Tom Judd then asked the citizens for comments or suggestions. Comments: + Glary Drumb said that South Do.-.ton always gets left out when projects are being considered by the City of Denton. He also J mentioned that the Parks and Recreation Department is breaking their promise to the citizens of Denton by considering other options besides what was originally passed by the 1966 Bond Election. Gary Drumb said, "You are not going to have any luck getting support from this side of town." + There are many children that live in South Denton, however, there is a lack of ballfields and parks in South Denton. .i Cc J_9, , M(1oi da 411 Agernda fimn_._ os Z Iblo April 9, 1992 40/ 7 3 Page - 2 Commentsi • A couple of the citizens that were present commented that South Denton voted for the 1986 bond election because it was a balance of packages that would benefit the entire city of Denton. For example, Northeast and South Denton would acquire a recreation center. Citizens present felt option A or B would only benefit North Denton. • Not willing to consider option A or B, but will consider an option that consists of ballfields and parks. • According to one of the citizens present, the City of Denton Parks and Recreation Department made a promise in the 1986 Bond Election and felt that th,) promise should be kept as an obligation to the citizens. • option C should be presented in more detail. • According to Bill Claiborn, of the CIP 191 Committee, "The Council approved subsequent projects because the City would be able to leverage the money to complete more projects than were approved by voters in 1986 Bond issue." He also mentioned that he saw no leveraging of those funds approved by Council on option A. Bill claiborn also said, "These options tend to regionalize the city." • Frustrated with City of Denton due to the :lack of ballfields and parks in South Denton. Suggestionsi • Consider Option C together with the purch.-.se of land in South and East Denton. Then when the economy gets better, put the issue of the construction of two recreation centers on a bond package. • Should consider option C. However, instead of allocating all the $2.7 million dollars on two recreation centers, build one center which is twice as big. • The City of Denton should consider buying RTC land located in South Denton for the purpose of building ballfields, soccer fields, and parks for the community. The operation and maintenance costs would be less if this option is considered rather than option A or B. t {i jt ~f Acmida No.. = L~ Ageiidaltmm ~ a~--- Dolo April 9, 1992 Page - 3 Suggestions: • The Parks and Recreation Department should put a hold on is better t and $2.7 million recreation departmeent • Use the $2.7 million in bond money to build ballfields, parks, in both South and walking East Denton htrailor and ere there is soccer a shortage, North The citizens that attended the public meeting were mostly from South Denton. According to them, their main concern is the lack of ballfields and parks in the area. Steve Brinkman informed them that the City of Denton is in the process of purchasing land for i the purpose of building a park. However, the citizens wanted to know the time frame for the land acquisition and development. The majority of the citizens are willing to waitfVerrthe construction of the recreation center in their area. , balifields and parks with playground equipment were more important to them at this time. AJJ0031B ,r r Apo~~da No.c ~Q Afe% '91199;Z U Wia -SIGN SIGN IN SHEET CITY OF DENTON PARRS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS $ 32 Ess ~G TELEPHONE 5 e ~qr o +x~sot_J s l*i1 04vr- rz~(.e 5los r cl Dior s l G; M Lt_ 7-31 (~(o LL 17 ~a-~Go7 43 '7 75-2- 'Z2 6, r ti `i Agenda No. _ Via= D~ Agenda alto . SIGN IN SHEET CITY OF DENTON PARRS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS TAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE Q \ V f 4} Apentla No. y~ ~ Auenda Iiem02- Qale ~ k~3 Minutes for Public Meeting of the Parks and Recreation Department April 13, 1992, 7:00 p.m. Robert E. Lee Elementary council: MaryaHret Council imember er Board: Tom Judd, Vice Chairman, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Neta Stallings, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Member Staff: Betty McKean, Executive Director for Municipal Services and Economic Development Planning Parks coordinator creation Steve Brinkman, Janet SimpsonI Park Director Luisa Rodriguez, Secretary Guests: 6 citizens attended the public meeting Steve Brinkman initiated the public meeting with a brief pre funds. Hen then taskedions fork comexp nts Land osuggesti nsiofrom tithe $2.7 mi fu citizens. gptJ gn A:_ Renovation and Community Center Expansion of North Lakes Recreation C Natatorium in conjunction with the Denton independent school District Renovation of Dania Recreation Center and Civic Center Pool South Denton Park Land Acquisition Option B: Renovation and Community Center Expansion of North Lakes Recreation Center Renovation of Dania Recreation Center and Civic Center South Denton Park Land Acquisition Option C:_ North Lakes and Dania Renovation and Expansion Renovation of Civic Center Pool South Denton Park Land Acquisition i on ion D: SNorth Lakes, outh Denton Park aLand dAcquisition and New R Renovation Civic Center Pool District Center Option E Renovation of North Lakes Recreation Center New Natatorium Dania Renovation and Expansion Civic Center Pool Renovation South Denton Parks Land Acquisition f' ja fa C3 1 Agenda NO.. ~ el Agenda''llem-G_ 0alo April 13, 1992 r~ ~3 Page - 2 One recommendation that the Parks and Recreation Department received was to reconsider the location of the natatorium to Ryan High School. According to one of the citizens present, the high school has an area of land that can be used for the purpose of the natatorium. It was also said that the problem of transportation by the High School Swim Team would be solved if the Board considers this recommendation. Steve Brinkman informed the citizens that the Denton Independent School District is considering using that land for a future elementary school. He also mentioned that a neutral zone fcr the natatorium was preferred by the D.I.S.D. rather than locating it at one high school or the other. one of the citizens indicated that she would consider Option D if part of the money could be used for park equipment for the South Denton park land acquisition instead of using the money for the new district center. The main consensus of the public meeting was that the citizens could do without the two recreation centers at this time. However, the citizens felt that South Denton was deficient in parks and ballfields. AJJ00315 Ij C h5 i1 E l 9~-oil ~e'W a-t ws#? wle y~ SIGN IN SHEET CITY OF DENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE / /J!v o -A 0 ~ . k~ Po,~ ZI50Y UAL wc s fir. 3 g •7 71 5_ JAG ~C7©' c P• ~J}~L-9.5 2-`i u4 3 ey iy 3 1• Adonda No. Agen om ILIo Minutes for Public Meeting 3 for Parks and Recreation Department April 14, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. Woodrow Wilson Elementary Park Boards Gregory Dalton, Chairman, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Tom Judd, Vice Chairman, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Burkley Harkless, Member, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Catherine Bell, Member, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Counoil: Margaret Smith, Council Member Staff: Betty McKean, Executive Director for Municipal Services and Economic Development Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager Janet Simpson, Park Planning Coordinator Joy Hesoh, Administrative Secretary Guests: 13 citizens Steve Brinkman made a brief presentation on options for the expenditure of $2.7 million of bond funds. Options A: North Lakes Community Center Expansion Natatorium and Civic Center Pool Renovation Major South Denton Park Land Acquisition Option B: North Lakes Community Center Expansion Civic Center Pool Renovation Major South Denton Park Land Acquisition Option C: Expansion of North Lakes and Denia Civic Center Pool Renovation Major South Denton Park Land Acquisition Option D: New District Center Civic Center Pool Renovation Major South Denton Park Land Acquisition option E: North Lakes Community Center New Natatorium Civic Center Pool Renovation Major South Denton Park Land Acquisition st fi h Agenda No. ltom Agenda April 14, 1992 Page - 2 ail comments: • If it cost $1.2 million to construct the Martin Luther King, Jr. Recreation Center, why would it cost so much more now to build another recreation center similar to MLK. According to Steve Brinkman, CDBG made funds available for MLK, so the center actually cost $1.4 million. • An employee of the YMCA expressed concern of, the natatorium being in competition with them. • Loyce Wilson, who is from South Denton, indicated, "I do not want to negate the possibility of recreation center down the line, because there is no place for teenagers. But need to crawl before we walk - start with land on South side. We will compromise and go with something rather than nothing." • According to one of the citizens present, Denton is in need of a community park. She frequently goes to Avondale Park and it is heavily populated. • One of the citizens want to know if any money was allocated to the renovation of Joe Skiles Park. Recommendations: • Postpone the expenditure of $2.7 million until the economy takes a turn for the better. • Will not just consider the South Denton Land Acquisition, but want it developed into a park similiar to Avondale Park. 0 Stay with the original plan of the two recreation centers, however, instead of constructing two small recreation centers, just construct one bigger recreation center. 4 Consensus was to acquire land for the development of ballfields and installation of play ground equipment. Also, the size should be big enough for a future recreation facility. AJJ00329 1 y i~ fV A Cate SIGN IN SWI= CITY OF DENTON PARRS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE d., «t ~I tv 3a) F' Stn zt, V11 "7 44 ZIA Zod,) pow c 7 ZAA Sid -2 1 (A ho -3 C/ 3 '3 9L - 4, (o7 - 3 - z9 4d r j Agenda No. Minutes of Public Meeting Agenda flam. 44)S *-q for Parks and Recreation Departmert~~, -a S;YZ April 1,5, 1992, 7:00 P.M. a~ 5~3 North Lakes Recreation Center council: Harold Perry, Council Member Margaret Smith, Council Member Park Board: Tom Judd, Vice Chairman, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Neta Stallings, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Member Staff: Betty McKean, Executive Director for municipal services and Economic Development Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation Janet Simpson, Park Planning Coordinator Luisa Rodriguez, Secretary Guestst 39 citizens Tom Judd initiated the public meeting with a brief history of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Steve Brinkman then presented the options to the citizens. Option A: North Lakes Community Center Expansion Natatorium and Civic Center Pool Renovation Major South Denton Park Land Acquisition Option B: North Lakes Community Center Expansion Civic Center Pool Renovation Major South Denton Park Land Acquisition Option C: Expansion of North Lakes and Denia Civic Center Pool Renovation Major South Denton Park Land Acquisition option D: New District Center Civic Center Pool Renovation Major South Denton Park Land Acquisition option E: North Lakes Community Center New Natatorium Civic Center Pool Renovation Major South Denton Park Land Acquisition Comments: North Denton does not have neighborhood parks for small children. • South Denton only has Skiles Park which includes two poorly surfaced tennis courts and a broken merry-go-round. • North Lakes is too congested with people who are jogging or walking along Windsor. 1 Agenda th. 9v? April 15, 1992 Agenda Ilum CfJSZ _ Page - 2 Dale .-~2- 9,2 Comments: There is a shortage of parks in all of Denton. Ago% • North Lakes park does meet the needs of children and teenagers in North Denton because facilities surrounding the park are adult oriented. • Plenty of ballfields in Northeast Denton, however, there is an overall shortage of parks in Northeast Denton. suggestions: • Stay with original plan of two recreation centers. • Many joggers and walkers in North Denton. Need walking and bicycle trails. Delay the expenditure of $2.7 million at this time until the economy gets better. • Purchase land in South Denton for the development of ballfields and the installation of playground equipment, • Expand North Lakes and Denia Recreation Center for the purpose of teenagers. • North Denton citizens will not consider any type of expansion at North Lakes until the problems of traffic are resolved. Reconsider location of natatorium to another part of town. • Additional lighted parks for youth in North Denton. • Purchase and development of land in Northeast Denton for a park. • The expenditure of $2.7 million should go on a referendum so the that citizens can vote on how to spend it. • Sidewalks and hiking trails for North Denton. The three main concerns from the citizens that were present at the public meeting were: 1. More parks in South Denton. 2. No expansion of North Lakes until the problem of traffic is resolved. 3. More parks in Northeast Denton. Aal00326 r Agenda No, SIGN IN SHEET T CITY OF DENTON PARRS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS N E ADDRESS TELEPHONE 1 3 0 P X 5'~ •a'l JO~~ SG/dNa C, 2613 "T~~✓td.~/ idD` •~87-_!OI U)OC. 113 /'>QD6 pR, Lj/J 7-ij Al -387- 2-338 f 1 P MOaUA~ 37S-a poc*ev /1, L2 /Z .1iw~ Si~1e tilt+z.+ N~1.~ 'kv-(V, I yy 3&2 -7 g0 z_ -py f~~✓~✓' n C.P'OPOAC)C.~ '{u 'tea f'7 jy / ) t c 1 yy) 0 s o 3 k 1 I fi 9J LL T-',rt4 -SA 2 z~ sr 5 ..~/z a,~r rru~c oS" f <oc~~e~~ l%/j r O~ ~Uk4 d vvV ci2 0 a a 3 8 7 -G 3 3 b f) ef AL 741);VA 90 ii Apnnda No. ~lz Apida z9 ~ ~3 SIGN IN SHEET CITY OF DENTON PARRS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NEIGHBORHOOD MHETINGS ADDRESS TELEPHONE NAME T 23 +3 r 3 34 ( J3 S //C m - LlC(J~0` J lac( c P,50, 744L4.o L~t~' f ?7 I ~ . ~,?i ~SG~L • 1.17 331.), a~ i Ifl[i .z3o+Y'~_u rL/ Agenda No. Agnnda Ham- ~ S ~Z= pile ---=4~" Minutes of Public Meeting for Parks and Recreation uspartment April 16, 1992, 7:00 P-m- Newton Rayzor Elementary Park Board: Dalton Gregory, Chairman, parks and Recreation Advisory Board Tom Judd, Vice Chairman, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Council: Harold Perry, Councilman Municipal staff: Betty McKean, Executive Director for Services and Economic Development Steve Brinkman, Director or Parks and Recreation D Janet Simpson, Park Planning Coordinator Pam Livingstonr Leisure Services Manager Luisa Rodriguez, Secretary Guests: 10 citizens Tom Judd gave a brief presentation on the history of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and on the options being considered for the expenditureaof s2.7 million. uggestions: The citizens were then asked for their ao Options As NatatoriumsandmCivicyCenterr Pool paRenovation Major South Denton Park Land Acquisition North Lakes Community Center Expansion Option B: Civic Center Pool Renovation Major South Denton Park Land Acquisition Option Cs Expansion of North Lakes and Denia Civic Center Pool Renovation Major South Denton Park Land Acquisition Option D: New District Center Civic Center Pool Renovation Major South Denton Park Land Acquisition option E: North Lakes Community Center New Natatorium Civic Center Pool Renovation Acquisition Major South Denton Park Land l s p. r..i:2'16\q IS i; , Awda No. Aponda [lam. GUS Oslo " ' April 16, 1992/ Page - 2 Comments: • The $2.7 million dollars "hat remain are sufficient for the purchase and development of land in South and Northeast Denton. • Does the South Denton Land Acquisition consist of playground equipment? At the present time, only the land acquisition has been discussed. • The community of South Denton will be willing to help if the option of a park in South Denton is considered (i. e. community built playground). Suggestions: • A park for Northeast Denton which consists of playground equipment, skateboard areas, and go-carts. • A recreation center in Northeast Denton. • The money allocated in the 1986 Bond Election should be used in the areas where the original recreation centers were supposed to be located - Northeast and South Denton. • Purchase land in both Northeast and South Denton for the purpose of a park with the installation of playground equipment. AJJ0032B x tleM, Apixotem-'a2 SIGN IN SHEET CITY OF DENTON PARRS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE f 1220 ^s1'' ~~3 -LJ3 / a - ~8 ice, ~K lnc Di , /o Jai 2 0 I eq Dr 54 0 60 3 4o of7l 587-Y72.0 A/ I' -up Oentonneeor&Cb ie ms.~. nos as xo. zw Denson. Texan - ' tLosh2t.Ilp ~ 33 ,c~ rf~ CitY to ponder subsfi tote arks C by David warit; ro ec a tioa~. Denton Farb cad Becres. City Counou nwouna ram ama bd wonid w~ tb. y North to mad 28.7 min in kaad ■ww► bow p ..a. - = to : : toP aob~eh o~iaa Cintee .nd boilmd a 1o PM . 10DWW OMn, than tsetse a ra an. a.ola:, t.cao,. it indoor/outdoes plot rather °`nasnwnoMa Ms•a woald ...v o .ad the - than build two amailsr ■ w;N SAN 1400 000 is asatsr■ on !ha aortheaat and ■Mnta7tae Pmnr~. 09=1sta. "Ve 7ho Denton air Counea will he.. 2te R A1a1 ~ /~rMNpr eo~Olda'~k gk Oe*rg &a g&s ~ ~ a two raaaatinn reO i that sabetltrrtad „ h an _ by (_!ns*wv=W two arse a~~ 4teO in a IM bpnd be ~tW~l6t ~ 77at~an Gat~l~ an City 'anal- Utd two now osatsrn editl wan PC$" , bat to baud *804 10,% *7 would need to bstdgets because of speed Naar vi +be bond momar barter times and slower th Ugh econazo, seted Ludo and C'u, rsmdndar aiwo bpma ee~add lttioa growth ib aid Cantu e about ~halt the dw dteMatn at the Martin >-M&. 194 Jr. 8eaaagty ~ ooa for y. ~ compleetedinLM9., board will eoadnot ;oar yparb atnien ales Ana 400,0 new and the ownail will oaaduct 1200,000 world bael~ To pq Ibr tpm m t6a prapoesls oparktiai and malatataing the 16~d 00 ft W- V tasee might need to ,96 miIIion bond paetrageth~ br atser Ms. Sarni said ceadftlaa that no tas iace+aw be atlt recnatiaa llae an ender the, strain oa tight cbt7 SaaCOMM/SA Council FrMM/U n~ Movements. maiatda i~a• coo each. m4ntm Would be The 0011231011 will dieauss two pspoAn&thw en~t on ~ 20,000square fi* plans recammeadsd by the =Z ~y0 WM the Denton parka board at Tuesday's p ant School District ~g~~., : the toads and mss` etpaad North ing the 6duty. Laken by 20,000 aq~ar~ feet at The second plan 1. can. a cost of $2 million lum approving naooate todstla6 North'Lek" DIED o dales a ftttoij hr the and Dania Se~.ation bonnd lludulft~{es for 4100,000 eachc Both options also iaalade `.aC9a 'O~tlO egaa d ~ Nadia ~t $ 0, oo to 1 mll on, plus new park adstina North Lakes a later d At to he built at 1 V Agenda Nn. Agenda Ilem Ikle .~~~8=~ r, Sunday,APril5, 1992/DentonRee6z+d-Chr6nicle/11H NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS The City of Denton Parks and Recreation I ` fIGTIGE CP- Advisory roadiscuss rd will hold neighbofiood ~lwN: Meetings options for the use of The `I" of Psrkt d ROCrvOtien Advis llOry ry 600r Board 1086 Bond funds for Recreation Centers. wmOO IP01l to dlKW10Widna far the u00 of 1116 BOW WndO hr RKnOtlen COMhro, Aprtl 9, 1992 7100 pm.- irlydty United Methodist T~Hy1UnIff*d7AMMw#t Church' Ch4woWEwjift n 636 East Hobson April 12, IOM, 7;00 P.M. LN10EUm«MN0AkckPy Sc IOa April 13, 1992 7100 p.m. Lee Sementory School ? , +I E ,m, 800 Mack Place IJ91 Emerson Aprll Ii, NIL 7A p.m. April 14, 1992 7100 p.m. Wilson Elementary ROynf9I fsry$V" school i100 A10i1n1 dln~+lmowyrlensto 1601 Emerson s~ Z fv March 20, Aorll 2,$, 1"1 AprM 15, 1992 7100 p.m, North Lakes Rocnx tfon Center 2001 West Windsor April 16, 1992 7100 p.m. Rayzor Elementary School 1400 Malone Please direct any questions to 566-70 Agoida No. Aponda Item GUS ~a ciety- to consider r pool renovation Ay Dadd Mutt suf%Mter Part of two major options the council is canaldaring for the bond program also included The city staff will recommend on Tuesday spending X00,000 to buy a large parcel of land that the city council spend $500,000 of a $27 for use in south Denton. million bond packaje renovating the CI,,go "Lnatead of epsndbw half a million on land we Center Pool instead of spending the money to will spend half a million on the l," if the buyy a large piece of ark land in mouth Denton, oouncil agrees with the new propoaasaid Steve Thr council had asked the staff to Brinkinan director of part and recreation. says to repair the pool with at of $ . at w we don't ~~nhe" to purchase the land out of bond money which may bs }ued expand the North baker ation Center and to butfd an The city staff is currently pursuing other Indoor-outdoor pool facility at the NorthlWuq options to pay for the park land Center. "We're got some ideas, but we're still trying to develop that on which way to go," said Lloyd Harrel!, city manager. He said one posalb lity the city staff was exploring wa • uatag interest money earn past band issues to make up a Of the $600,000 needed to buy the park lanlaft The renovation of the Civic Center Pool would cost $1 million , but the city wo=n' for only $600,000 of that from the $2.7 in bond boney. The city will apply fora matching grant from the Texas Parks and Wildlife Ladd park 94o POOL./dA Pool I+'rom/IA' Fund, Mr. Brinkman said. City Council 1l The two major bond pro Cowd to cowmpo l F~~,J~-l(,,i(1 posals the City Council will propopow to ~ bull l ~ a nee, pod ~C consider Tuesday are. may, Moo yw ONt C;0MW Pool Wd ■ A plan 000 to expand North sound North L wm Aamom c4n*, Lakes by 20, fast at ` a cost of $2 million, plus r + ~ ~ renovate existing North Lakes r wMmxee t•.oorkll dxr,~hars, and Dents Recreatlon Qenter Mw ipal &AWkV, 215 L Molannay st facilities for $100,000 and spend X600,000 repairing the Another $1 million would be Civic Center Pool. spent on a 20 0004quamfoot ■ A plan to upend North new pooi faoflity at North ( Lakes by 10,000 sq feet at Lakes, with the Denton In. \`1S a cost ")f $1 ml on, plus dependant School District renovate existing North Lakes matching the funds. $600,000 and Dania Recreation Center also d be spent an repairs faoilitias for,;100,000 each. to the Civic Center Pool. Agenda No, Agenda Rom DentonRecord.-Chrofile a palm in2sennooe VoLANa960 Denton, Texas Aptll,llea 95cwt, _ a r Z - a Parks--- Pr 1~. Piair W eha~ngasa n" HH o~nssCaidn°. ~d 1 At Tuesday l mnoil to be -r workshopproon°noil members, board 000000001 $500 000 of thee sL7 million on Neighborhood in an ~ Z City OiDdals hope to win meeting f 600A00 would have been need du*W a to . larp st of pars series of veep l hborheod ■wNnr~l~Mpi--a+w~aw Ice TI DwMpam Au latae ltre cow the meedaP, or - piano to wad e,pl~M ptcpoerY nd+ee is $L7 14,7 million on Denton *0 Wend an hetit~ amend acted at the dty etas snd 1he aft w~a"m commusity Me1M~ members ale &Ttl to swat barb bard to asove ahead are . oa with the neighborhood Fak74 eatioean pal ■nMiaa7Pe~nr.edw meettnpofltbeproJects Top,* the (laic Caster pool n~~?,y~~~e,eeK The first ati hborhood sad bmild on lndocrleutdooR chxd%e» laron Late meeting to rsoetre pat on the ' POOL at Mortis 1Ak" These and pool options was to wouladwrc resatiopLaa planecentertos thane! and eonthesd 1)satoa ; at 111 a m. Way at the budid two spprored by yotrs to a 1006 This wonl says the city CAll eof°tthheerermainin bond Wee" 1100,000 to ,000 in ysarlf W1 boyhood meetinp will 01 titaaagOr Harrell operatlea and maintenance afi 7 p m. sad be: co an mity Ushod t0,lyy no plannars mama wwaasm support x odisb ilburch) M the hearbags t or or ~d Won y• bonds and certificates at SdHobsonLana, yw Monday Plans. Mambies ey l me* d a dty spy!! abli`stlan to ps0' or &P ps° p80i 1 14 a t Wilson acre as Wits and row-eaum vow Dentin rsrldsoft b I•W* need a very strong lwwn Elementary Scheel, 1g0i i a top.ooboh rsrYeatioa public hdosmation dutipalps ■ April lg at NrW Wm ~st Noyth Lkes instead an ptttog this oat beGue we gecreatCeater, 4001 W. of building two rmaller SeePAFii'S/6A Windw, and ftatisa in nor' M April 10 at li a y s o r 31 entary School, 1400 200 board willAPOm st to e8theicusePffirminput film the neighborhood meaun , rbe an~o board will the coomil report dp t April 41. , Apida No, Agonda llam_a2 Denton R Dale ---n 38 pages in 4 awtwns VOL K No. 252 Deni on, Taws Apia 10, heel 25csnu .rr..r-.roc ram rez:.r W,Axr m o++++"a+-az••: - 1 No Oppose e with the proposal PIWm/ILA tarySchool,Soo meMetingdisae d eta at the at Le ELmea geed, Mack Race. Khe cn.lfttle thing poa said The parka board has prv. we'd get in the bond issue, oppose =7 they ,d w= North Lakes you ve taken that away, too," mid it would be more wAd He aannd other roWdentssaid /y cost-effective during tough they wanted theprorso ation p ark plan economic times. maters they wereramell but no matter bow of mmtlonLakkees would cost would prefer parkland for BynavidMott $1160,000 a year if it ware ex• athlatlo Ids. fan oy ae.aw:i~ paraded and the pool baitt as "We don't need a opposed to spending =300,000. • buildings what we need is land South Denton residents Thursday blasted a year to operate two new to fayy on," said John city proposal to scuttle two recreation centers maters, said Sane Brinkman, that were going to be built with money from a parka director. He suggested the solution bond ggrraamm a roved by voters in 1988, might be to spend $1 million Thi~Dentc parks board sad day etas Also, to build the centers, currently dedicated to the in- to o members have proposed spending $2.7 million aloadwd and would new need side a be Paz p doaroklaur / o n t d out n walks o r p o o I o n ezpanding North Lakea Recrestion Center, utility Una world be necessary dia s w time repalrhtg the Civic Center Fool and building an e°sesary 'Kt's as ideal time to ob• indoor/outdoor pool at North Takes rather at the cites Mr, Brinkoun to i n land" because the tkhaa bnilding the two canters - one in nor- Bald. Each 2 the new centers economy has deprossed the thaest Deatoa sad one in the southeast part would be about half the site of real estate market Mr. ofthadty. the MLKRecreation center. Bristoferson said. "Wow's "T think it would boo =ethical to use the What was o dually pro. the time to do it, I think, bond for this pnrpom," former Mayor Ray p~ could not l» t today," rather than spending just, for Stephens sold at it neighborhood meeting said Tom Judd, a member of the sake of spending, anvi by the parks board to pup rw- the parks board. "Our f is "Let's get the land and that we're not shorlchanag have another bond issue to ideate opinions t about the proDOSaLpe n that this area so much u getting build thew centan," "We tried to ar i trfieee the }rest value for our money" Jayne Boston agreed, City Hall of ahiffing it *xA d keep keen word. shortchanging the AAb*ut 38 people attended the mssting at Trinity United Methodlet Church. By a show of hands, more than two--thirds of thaw at. tending oppoeedtheswitch. say ia~ 61111M in the area large piece of parkland in The nest neighborhood meeting to discuss iacludia9 the Timber Oaks, south Denton for future the bond propouL will be at 7 pm Monday Forrestridge, Monter,ito, development. Southmont and Bent Oaks But the purchase was seeOPPOSE/8A developments - couldn't removed hvm the proposals walk to North Lakes and under study when - at the couldn't always get rides aouncWs request - $W,000 there, of the $2.7 million was "There are a lot of diverted for repairs for the Children in these areas and deaytesg Chic Center POOL they don't have any place to Daring an eseeutive ase• go and pplay b~all," she said, Rion at their last meeting Mr. Brlakmaa said the city council members disowwa maetar plan showed there finding other ways to buy wee not enough pwW and in parkland in earth Denton. rain Denton. City Manama T,16ya He on ~ to roll said at the neghborhood spend the $2. mllCpjn a }toad meeting that Were was monoy prosented to the "sons than enough =n in cu+ >f600,000 world have bond interest to on been spent to purchase a that me*parktand," ii Apida No.. :Q EDITORU~,"' wt JI' I , 'l3 City proposal ~a/jf 7 for pool good use of funding 0 no ofthe benefits of the U.B. form of governwent is r that the people's np* sentatives can nrospond to changing realities faster them in a pure dL democracy. It ahnply takes less time for & a sitting body to tailor its decisions to reality than itw=W for the entire ac populace to debate and v*W on my De Aa Aa in ppWnt is the proposed by the 4 Denton Parks and Recreation MIA p y to open' $&7 million is ' 006 toad moy in v peyns dilfireat Orom the tthh original proposal. Voters OKW the M m*tbena eiet ar~ ~ Southeast sides adtewn. Now, wow a onters would Mate making thow centers c smaller than originally wanted and would require $150,000 to $100,000 in yearly maiabmamp - something originally covered by the band package. Bins curb TWO so quickly, garb and recreation vtaE'rig3stlya to think pr how Denton resident pt tho e most far their money. The g' as nd North Lkes Receation Cimter, outdoor ~iwlmming pool faciliity and extensively I a*vAe, the pool at civic Center Park This substitute plan makes good i sense. Denton residents cerulnly need an indoor pool Bins swimming is such = for tlw older reesident, an indoor would allow o Denton wAA&tt a to exerdae and e*y It AIM makk" a lot more Sam to c have two usable pools and a flret-dass t recreation center than to buy land and build two additional aentars thstwonld r not be u to Dardaas's standards. We My support thin alternative, r and a Denton residents to e beeam~ with the plan by at. c tending the series of neighborhood r meetings the parks and recreation i department has scheduled to discus it, ~ Those meetings will be 7 m Monday at ire rJementary Bdnoo 800 Mack Place; 7 p.m. iVnndaT at Wilson Sla a yB 1E01 Emerwn Bt.; t and 7 Elementary 9choo4 1400 M~aione ft c t c {f ~ ~ t p.~. r.IeHnnMIL" 14AMI.TRR-0167 f2L Agenda w, AUanda Item. ZiJS Dale 6A/Dem3onReoa~d-Chroaric4J~aiusda~,ppol.i1.1992 3y a~( ,~3 019ty-seeks feedback on bond package 9y Dom Cobh northeast section of the city, a xVa0a1 Edetar second on the city'e south side. 'Ass two Centers were not built A now natatorium for Den- became city amewe to ton is not a sure thing yet, pay far bond retiremaatwsth a As Denton school officials tat increase ab4 when the city ponder awhat to put in nd whoa to a put bond. economy it ~oqp r did not . package gypped befon the voters, cfty officials ay - - I ect.14 said are listening to residents' view. Harrell. on whether to spend old braid He was iseussing the mone9onanrtktorium natatorium during oint The ;2 mi],ion natatcri mss of and part of yropoeed espaaaion of ' sahoel board officials Friday at North LLakes Community the school's administraton Coates', is ; Joint PvJect be- building: twween the city and school Comshvetion cost increases district. whittled. the sign of bui,diaae School officials currently , the bond money could build plan to spend ;1 million of a and city official were also =89.6 million bond concerned sbou# an if rotors approve it. additional ¢800,000 earls -jeer idea Is to llst the ;1 to operate the illion aeeparateoposi- a he said. once m =lamp site devalolmnent plans slow School trustees are., 19,000 square feet for the scheduled to make a decision natatorium with an sighttdapp on the total bond package swimming pool; a smaller Tuesday. If they =j it and recreeaticmal pool that could be call an election, iest it mod for therapy; a 10,000 would go before esters is May ~e tot Synmiudum; 90. At Ieeat. one school trust" now pares ups s; ~ additional suggested not calling for a locker rooms and a multi. bond olactfam until next fall or purpose gym. I&W In. the second of sat public "We need a &d ft ibr oar to Can public opi- swim team," said sclsocl trustee niwM Vicki Hdt. `Ws have to work around TWU (Tomes Woman's no an spend ;2.? million on a University) which is hard natatorium and expansion of because we have to work North bakes. The mosey is is& around ahoameir) ~aduL.... We .0w from a 1.9W bond program approvedLy'vo&w in 1988. City swim dabs and private The messy Initially was to swim clubs also use a swimm- be used for building two ing pool in Flower Mouud for recreation centers, one is the same oftheir evemta. Aponda No..~~~~ Ar~enda Ilem_li~,~' ~r`~ Wednesday, Aprfl-16. I992/DeatOa RecoId.Cb..nlcW t IA Northeask reside nts favor park..and -PUr ! *DavidMott stafiovrlur no put on Nll at all if no bell twds k," Mrs, Boston ighborh"d are Northeast Denton resilient. nfA6ting said. "Wo have said on the added their support land at ♦a s ~ " "nei~ ~od ra 8 park N w"f r p,n any Mrft center uth g 'Diveonus't the ~landd.. the to ~pum~ II6 h~da Thurat~ay, a majority of .7 'eed0^ gout Denton resi eats at. spend #2 C~, 2001 W.wkWM tending a neighborhood money, million is bond Meeting told parks board and about the . meeting attended w million bond issue. 'may ~~s that south Denton t 20 »ople, residents said The land wow nbably d~emn ended mre park °9 they wov~dild6r that the city cost more than and th did not iiu new rureation Brinkman said. ' , land. centers with money 4om bonds has dldas to Spend At the mfg, residents approved by wtera in 1988 as much ar M.00 uateea a major parcel of land 0 for the ■ Suggested building two land. 2001 OO&Aft as also is enton. purchased for South But residents also said Promised to vote ociaB. D rs, even if The 23113t in a series of Istb - should be ~d to build must be smaller because of Meetings a 7 p.m today at 'Buying it and fnst limitedlilads. North Lakes Recreation cows graze on it L not biting ■ Suggested building one i Center, 200 t W. Windsor, it the utilization" small recreation center and board Steve rkman, parks BilKeith, a nartheast Denton baying and developing park said the City nnident. land in south Denton. Council is - considering' several "We don't want ■ Criticized a proposal to U F.Wdng build a $2 million- indoor/ J inpti8ns toh ay for ~ Pak ud~gd can it Re want to t our pool if using interest i;rpm bond ch n grase on it, said boated outdoor at t bemuse it is the North Lakae ya. Boston, a south Denton center it mIAt oom mom 7001 yet using resident, nearby y~ part of the ps isea~ ;2. 'O land is ping to do us e Suggested pig it door/outdoor pool on a upa. rate bond issue. "Let's let it stand coal its own," said Marlene (tray, "Let's not piggy back and ntooohmoasy party, At the ' Meeting bol~rd councilwoman and th reminded residents that the Imm deuta, n° a desaid pnuot Baal decisions on the $2,7 million have been made, y~ !i Agenda Ho. _~~U/ yr--~- ' Agenda item z - r e Dente n ReeordLA -G"I M11 411%-511010 Mpages In3sections Vo1.6e,No.257 Denlon.Tcxn ArU16,1M 25 cents Southside park gains support Parks From/1A "I would really lute to Sea the and troads taken care of before enZ ■ Suggestad building a pro. t4' largeparka and recess- I'm is done in the area, p,d indoor/outdoor pool in hd11 said Jim &n sibrecht, whom Denton instead of at Neighborhood , The dca three recreation liv,n sear Q meeting centers are Martin Luther nightmare NMuk ortRr~ 'Tt'ea Northl.akss. Sing Recreation Ceuta 1300 At the meeting residents Mr. Judd said the proposed ■WHAT04MOdoreoodtnssapbsepeh Wilson; Denis Recreation also, $2 rafflion pool faafflty might Ra>o+eM and r*W oenwM* regal seas Center, 1001 Partin; and the ■ not the no longer be a realistic option, P brperd>rt 7rtieknMbend torMy North Lakes &d*, 7001 W. because the city and the Dan. ei 7 Windsor, Con Independent School ■W"Uft7keeefe ~ City officials haw agrwdL ■ Suggested additional District would have shared ■WHIRLMaysorEW «,enpehed,teoo south Denton needs more liQQlitfn and more youth- costs for the natatorium. Mrtar 6t parkland sad have been e=- oslenteI facilltles at North Tusaday, DIED trusts" in- optionstobnypropaty Lakee, definltei~~rr postponed a tiDavldeaott ■ Requested more 4Fou~d multimillion dollar bond Hutt included its half t7fs4wkftar North Daatoa residents equipment for amar+ maaren packe *read the parkland for south living meth of Hercules Street, of the cui=g cost.. The tido might haw turned, dur• ! Denton should be a priority. ing a aeries of neighborhood meetings, But they also told parka board for Denton residents demanding roes member's and city AW-1s that pro mAlems needed to parkland in the south part of town, ! tr+ffir`mw Parke board member Tom Judd ; be ruminated wound North conceded Wednesday that a major " Lakesbrier.itwasemisnded park in south Denton =p would One of the city's proposals be amcsrg the board's to the Would double the sift at the City Council when the. board con- North Lakes center, I elder community wavationa neat' About 40 people crowded into a meeting room at the North Lakes Recreation Ceatar to hear options the parka bard is studying and to Add . their input lute how to spend $10 million in bond money originally designated &r two recreation eenten, V yon71 give us ball A" and [ us" - not just the land - tZ_bs rvai happcau~a"w in the " Dd Judd r•pIi•d "I'm our that will be a very strong reoommenda- Mrs. Sriatotersan said south Denton Ouxte'dy has AMM to "two poorly enr*ced tennis courts, &W swings and a broken amq-go-round• at oars small park. She said residenta have to drive to other parts of town to See PAliPMI" 'i NOTICE Agenda No, _~o? -l~/4z O Agenda ItemY(1~,1`_?~ _ NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS The City of Denton Parks and Recreation Advisory Board will hold neighborhood meetings to discuss options for the use of 1986 Bond funds for Recreation Centers. April 9, 1992-7:00 p.m.-Trinity United Methodist Churc 633 East Hobson April 13, 1992-7:00 p.m.-Lee Elementary School 800 Mack Place April 14, 1992-7:00 p.m.-Wilson Elementary School 1601 Emerson April 15, 1992-7:00 p.m.-North Lakes Recreation Center 2001 West Windsor April 16, 1992-7:00 p.m.-Rayzor Elementary School 1 400 Malone Please direct any questions to 566-8270. - over Options for the Implementatto;a"81Q-Ta. .s 7986 Bond Funds for Parks andF-le --l atron In 1986, Denton voters arov,~d the xpendie of $5.9 mill. for the development of athletic fields, three tneighborhood5centersn centandeers. expansion The on remaining the Senior enior fund Centel. All of the facies have, constructed with the except liti ion of two neighhorhood recreation te the implements* s ($2.7 million) are now available to Recreation. .iou of the 1986 Bond Program for Parks and Recreation. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has dete"mined that in the current economic climate if the two centers were built, their size would he about half revenue Potential of what was originally p;:roposed, s;ith low and prohibitive operation and maintenance costs. The Park Board has developed other opt±.ons for the use of the $2.7 million which represent better and more efficient funds. use of these OPTION A , This option involves the renovation and 10,000 square foot expansion of the North Lakes Recreation Center to include a regulation size gymnasium, men's and women's locker rooms, fitness room, meeting rooms, multi-purpose room, and accommodate the recreational needs of creates a youth area teenagers. A new 19,000 square foot natatoriumg woulddalsoabe constructed to provide year-round recreational, competitive and therapeutic programming to the city. Construction of the natatorium requires the participation of the Denton Independent School District in the construction costs. Recreation center would be renovated. The In addition the Denia remaininq'f nds would then be used for the renovation of the Civic Center Pool, OPTION B This secondary alternative would app1 participate in the natatorium funding, Y if the DIED did not of Denia and North Lakes Recreation enters, and des the renovation 00 re foot expansion of the North Lakes RecreatioCen er,Oto aqunew Community Center. This expansion would include a regulation size gymnasium, locker rooms, multi-purpose room, kitchen, meeting rooms, youth c(,nter, fitness room, and racquetbail Courts. The remaining funds would then be used for the renovation of the Civic Center Pool. These options will be discussed in detail at the Neighborhood Meetings listed on this flyer. You are encouraged to attend and voice Your opinion on this issue. If you cannot attend you may call the Park Department office at 566-8505 or send your written comments to City of Denton Parks and Recreation Department 321 East McKinney Avenue Denton, TX 76201 over t 'r ~I rti JCITYM COUNCIL mt-M - - - - - 4++4t -f - ooooogoaoao 00° ooo~ ` E ti I, °oo 0 o. p ~ x OS O o a c o c c o o G°°°° at. l ,1 Agenda No. Q~2_ Agenda 11em__Z( A Ctry of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING/ DENTON, TEXAS 78201 / TELEPHONE (817) 888.8307 Office of the Clry Manager MEM012.PiNI7iJM TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager s FROM: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager DATEr April 23, 1992 SUBJECT: Work at the Airport For the last several months, we have been working and have been successful on several FAA grant proposals. These include the airport master plan, the land for the extension of the southern runway and clear zone on the northern end, and the runway overlay project. The last project that we are working on is the 1000' extension on the southern end of our existing runway. i We have been pursuing this last grant vigorously for the last several months. The Airport Board is unanimously in favor of this project and have been working with us diligently to parsue this grant. We have been told by a number of FAA officials that the grant is imminent. The total amount of the grant for the engineering and the actual construction of the 1000' extension has been estimated a,L over $1 million. We have been told that the City of Denton's participation or share of that project will be 10%, or somewhere around $1201000 to $150,000. As always, this is a very good kind of project for the City of Denton since we get to leverage every dollar of ours for $9 of federal money. However, because of our recent success, we have all ready begun to stress the present budget. That is, since we were successful on the land, the master plan and the overlay, our 10% share of thos6 projects will be approximately $13,800, $13,500 and $120,000 or approximately $145,00 - $150,000 this year. Because we were successful in getting these grants in such rapid succession, we did not anticipate these costs in last year's budget. Therefore, the Council has elected to fund these projects from the existing fund balance and any other funds we could find. Because we were able to find a small amount of money from the 1985 CO issue for development of the southeast corner of the airport, we estimate that the total effect of these grants on the unencumbered fund Agenda No. Aponda Item LCJS Lloyd V. Harrell a / April 23, 1992 Page 2 balance will be to reduce this amount between $100,000 and $110,000. As you are aware, the more we decrease our fund balance, the more difficult becomes the task to balancing the 1992-93 budget, Because of our success on projects for this year, we have been attempting to see if there are other ways that we could begin to get assurances from the FAA that we will indeed be successful in securing the grant for the extension within the next year so that we could begin construction and have the extension ready by next summer. This would allow us to facilitate the growing number of jet landings and take-offs. Indeed, we all ready have two large jets based at the airport, and we believe this extension would generate even more aircraft using, or being "home based", at our airport. FAA personnel have advised us that the City of Denton could fund all of the engineering work up front. We have visited with Freese and Nichols about the costs of this total engineering package. It is estimated to be approximately $95,000. The FAA has indicated that they believe all of this cost would be eligible to be used as part of our 108 match on the entire overlay project. Obviously, this is less that the entire grant amount of money. However, it is still a very substantial amount of money that would impact the remaining fund balance significantly. We, therefore, began discussions to see if we could reduce the cost further. We have had initial discussions with Freese and Nichols that indicate we could do the engineering in phases. This would allow us to spend around $60,000 for the first stages of the engineering design. We believe this could be done, and it would further reduce our initial cost. We have also discussed with Freese and Nichols using staff personnel to do the actual surveying. At this time, we are still checking out all of the technical data requirements and the form of that data with Freese and Nichols, but we believe that could be handled by the staff. This would reduce the cost further to somewhere around $45,000 - $50,000, Our last scenario, or proposal, would be to continue to work with the FAA to see if we could split the grant offer into an offer for engineering and an offer for construction. That would mean that the engineering design total cost of approximately $95,000 would be split on a 90/10 basis which means our cost and initial outlay would be only $10,000. Obviously, this would be the most preferred alternative. Staff will continue to work on all of these alternatives and will bring you and the Council up-to-the-minute information on them at our meeting Tuesday evening. ii Agenda No. cza. (L.: Apendaltam_~'s_~ ~ - Lloyd V. Harrell 3 y April 23, 1992 Page 3 1 have attached a letter from Mr. Mike Nicely from the FAA which indicates that all of these costs can be eligible to be counted as part of our 10% of any projects. Our problem has always been that we have never been able to secure a letter from the FAA that says these costs will be counted as 10% of our project. We have been advised by former and existing FAA personnel that this is almost always nadvised the siderationAandooneBthat Council would weigh heavily. Given the indications by the FAA and the strong desire to continue see the airport grow, the Airport Board felt that it was appropriate that these items be discussed with the Council. Our Airport Board Chairman, Mr. Rick Woolfolk, will be in attendance Tuesday evening to address these issues with the Council. I wanted to provide this information to you and the Council so that the Council would be aware of the implications of any of these decisions on the existing budget. The staff is very excited about the prospects of getting the southern extension for our airport. However, we remain cognizant of the existing budget limitations. Therefore, we think the most advantageous alternative would be to continue to seek construction of the airport extension into two grant offers soothat we would have the smallest effect on the budget. if you or the Council has further questions, we would be happy to try to answer them at your convenience. Rick Svehla Deputy City Manager RStbw AMM00138 AIRPORTS 04-21-1992 11:00 ?17 d24 512? AgonCaItem- WO _ Lam' y 9 APR t 1 12Q Mr. LToe Thotspson Denton Municipal Airport Routs 1, Box 100 Denton, TX 76205 Dear Mr. Thompsons This letter is in response to your inquiry regd.higrirvices eligibility for reimbursement of engineering which are performed prior to the issuance of a grant. I An airport sponsor can be'reimbursed for the preparation of pans, project prior to the execution of awgrantaprovided the for a p sponsor can most owrtain conditions. The consultant retained to provide such services must have been pprocured in acoordanaje with 44 CFR part 1s and Federal Aviation Administration A-' isory circular`150/5100-18.rvioa_a ,.~~t~ettrat JL'V ?lr of this adyifory airou~ar tAO far Airnorta. a*+~g►ti rroiec A copy jig-* bboon enclosed, in order to satisfy this re irement, the fiaaticn, airport sponsor must complete the enclosed cart which is entitled, Lo WA~ Reimbu rs r such servicea could not be elAe ubmittedrto the our rolLice. the madeuntil a 4ranthas ba. n~d sa Certification completed Ne hope this has boon roe doinotto oiuurtinquiry. if you have any questions, pisao~ sincsrsly, r ORIGINAL SIGNED BY MIKE NICELY HiM Hiosly qq prj~jsrpprtanDivision enclosures (2) Ij Njenda No.. D ~ Auenda Item__ W10 GRANT SUMMARY DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 1975 AIPN7-48-0067-01 Install Visual Approach Slope 75% Federal $ 20,700.00 Indicator Lighting System. 121% State 30450.00 12j% City 3,450.00 Total $ 27,600.00 1975 AIPN7-48-0067-02 Land Acquisition. 759 Federal $ 18,679.31 121% State 31113.22 12j% City 3,113.22 Total $ 24,905.75 1976 AIP#5-48-0067-03 Land Acquisition. 90% Federal $297,000.00 5% State 17,833.33 5% City 17,833.33 ".'otal $332,666.66 1977 AIP#5-48-0067-04 Relocate FM 1515 and related 908 Federal $ 93,652.45 improvements. 5% State 5,202.91 5% city _ 5,202.92 Total $1040058.28 1977 AIP#5-48-0067-06 Extend runway from 4,150' 90% Federal $ 53,650.00 to 5,000' and related 5% State 2,980.55 improvements. 58 City 2,980.56 Total $ 59,611.11 1977 AIPM5-48-0067-05 Install Medium intensity 908 Federal $3180550.31 Runway Lights, VASI-4, and 58 State 17,697.24 lighted wind cone. 58 city 17,697.24 Total $353,944.79 1979 AIP1/5-48-0067-07 Overlay and mark runway. 806 Federal $650,888.86 20% city 162,722.22 Total $813,611.08 1980 AIP#5-48-4800-01 Install radio controls to 80% Federal $ 80,000.00 the I.L.S. 208 State 20,000.00 Total $100,000.00 (f 7%90 Agenda No. Agenda Item#,g Dale Y, AIP#3-48-0067-02 Federal. $ 34,691.40 Update the Master plan and Environmental l Impact 0$ TCity otal ~ gg~ 854 ~ Assessment Report. 1985 AIPN3-48-0067-03 Develop Southeast:Corner. 90% Federal $226,737.22 106 City _ 22,746 02 Total $249,`4 1989 AIPN3-40-0067-03 Replace Infield Drainage 90% Federal $300,000.00 10% City 33.000 00 System. Total $333,000.00 TOTAL FEDERAL $2,094,549.55 TOTAL STATE 70,277.25 TOTAL CITY 272 600.11 GRAND TOTAL $2,437,426.91 i : •1 49 ABondaNo,_~a AQantla Itam_,~ 5 1011.3 Dato 7~y US.Depoorrev f WnwtAtI0r1 Soc!hwest aeg on OfkbnSpOrt' ;.;,:s:ana Arxar5a5 Forl WOO. Texas ?9!9ypprp Fodt I Avwtlon New Nex co O~ ahana t AdmWstrati } Texas v ' J The Honorable Bob Castleberry Mayor of Denton 215 East McKinney Street Denton, TX 76201 Dear Mayor Castleberry: Your request for assistance under the Airport Improvement Program, as authorized by the Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990, for Denton Municipal Airport has been approved for Fiscal Year 1992, The allocation is as follows: Federal Funds: $135,000 Project No.: 3-48-0067-06-92 Description: Conduct Master Plan Study This allocation may be used only for the planning described above. our Airports representative, Mr. Willie Villalobos, will contact you to provide any further assistance you may need. We look ssuccessfulforward your staff toward the Sincerely, George D. Conley Manager, Texas Airport Development Office TOGETHER WE SUCCEED • ,F ;i Agenda No, Arida Itorn 42 'P Data y U,S.Depor1nw1 Southwest Region Forl Ylor h. Texas 76193.0000 o(Tronspor:otfon Arkansas. Louisiana New Mexico. okishoma. FvoWal AvWlon Texas AdriNNstratIm y l The Honorable Bob Castleberry ` l Mayor of Denton 215 East McKinney Street Denton, TX 76201 Dear Mayor Castleberry: Your request for assistance under the Airport Improvement Program, as authorized by the Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990, for Denton Municipal Airport has been approved for Fiscal Year 1992. The allocation is as follows: Federal Funds: $1130760 Project No.: 3-48-0067-05-92 Developments Acquire land for north and south runway protection zones (55.7 acres). This allocation may be used only for the development described above. You will note that the allocation does not contain all of the funds and development you requested. Our airport representative, Mr. Willie Villalobos, will contact you within 7 days to provide any assistance you may need and to work with you to establish a project schedule. This schedule will include a timely grant offer being made based on land costs established by appraisal and review appraisal. This allocation is tentative and will remain valid so long as the project formulation is proceeding on an established schedule. Failure to meet the schedule will jeopardize project funding and could lead to withdrawal of the t6lbaht*ena We look forward to working with you and your staff toward the successful completion of this project. sincerely, ~G1 George D. Conley Manager, Texas Airport Development Office - TOGETHER WE BUCCEED t { \ i t„5 Ssr:tl!..tl .Z 1 f~ti: r I~tv>>I nµ1 , r{>~,c>trl 1 4jY fr J .1 I ' ~ 1~•TF V'. I! 411 s ~.Sq ',5..~.44•i~1r '7.~ I~T ~"~P (CIS" ^~~10f 4EF~ ~s, 1 t Y •.;,.,,~f LLY llIS I i( .S` 1 \ • M1 M Y4 I\ ~ 4 l S A9 Q ate. swim" P'"im . ioA WWK Texas 7610-00M Aftnus. Wstans, Fefta1 AVkWWn Texas e Mexko, ok+enoma, Ad1NrN6fro1{pn F EB 2 7 102 - The Honorable Bob Castleberry Mayor of Denton 21V East McKinney Street Denton, TX 76201 Dear Mayor Castleberry: Your request for assistance under the Airport Improvement Program, as authorized by the Aviation Safety and capacity Expansion Act of 1990, for Denton Municipal Airport:'has been approved for Fiscal Year 1992. The allocation is°as~.follows: Federal Funds= $1,176,000 Project No.s 3-48-0067-07-92 Development: Overlay Runway 17/35; rehabilitate taxiways and apron. pr.r~.triiil:, This allocation may be used only for the'development,described above and you are expeoted to proceed without delay...;'Our airport representative, Mr. Mike Nicely, will contact you within 7 days to provide any assistance you may need and to +ork with : you tro establish a project schedule. This schedui'e~'ill,include' a tiwoly grant offer being made baso4 on reoeipt•`of,bida'far constsouction. This allocation is tentative and willt!remain ' valid so long as the project forrPlation is prweeding on the schedule. Failure to most the schedule will jeopardize project funding 4~nd could lead to.withdrawal of the tentative allocation. We look forward to working with you and your staff ".toward the successful completion of this project. Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY 1104 4v, GyON Hugh W. Lyon Assistant Manager, Airports Division CITY COUNCII l oG ppp00000 dD c r o e pp~o D DO . ~6~OD o s o O 4- )10 S ooOO~~~~~COG G00ppp~Ov~o ti arr.-r-,, d} CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Agenda No. Agenda Item.__We5- TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council 0ale 4- 2 OM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager w'•'TECT: Maintenance at Fred Moore Park RECOMMENDATION: Receive a report and give direction. SUMMARY: Mr. Carl Young brought numerous concerns about Fred Moore Park to Council to be addressed. i BACKGROUND: f Each neighborhood park area receives both daily and weekly maintenance. This level of maintenance can only be increased if additional budget dollars are found or if other services are reduced or eliminated. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTO OR GROUPS AFFECTED N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A RESPECTF hY SUBMITTED: Lloyd o. Harrell City Manager Prepare by: N me Bab T ckner Title Superintendent of Parks Approv : Nam Batty o an Title Executi•,e Direot for Municipal Services/Economic; Development A Agonda No. Auonda Ilom_i:VS~ Lbto ? CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E, McK1NNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 M E M O R A N D U M Q TO: Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation FROM: Bob Tickner, Superintendent of Parks DATE: April 10, 1992 SUBJECT; Fred Moore Park Concerns We have reviewed the concerns of Mr. Carl Young noted at the city Council meeting on Tuesday, April 7, 1992, and have the following informations 1. x serf L-ElgotXJ9 Wiring We have checked the park site for any loose, hazardous electric wiring on a utility pole, The only thing found was a cover plate partially pried loose on a galvanized steel pole at the basketball court. The wires inside the pole are normal I with insulation and not hazardous, A new cover plate was made and has been installed. 2. Basketball Cgurt We have checked the basketball court and found no major problems. All four goals were rebuilt in December, 1991, with new heavy duty goals and chain nets. The court surface has begun to wear since it was resurfaced by a CDBG grant in 1985 at a cost of $7,160. This is normal wear just as the tennis courts which need to be resurfaced periodically, No funding is available for resurfacing this year. 34 bark -e-9 rity ~i,ghts There are three security lights broken, This is a continual maintenance problem on the 17 security lights in the park. All lights were repaired this past October. It is unknown when this current damage was done. Replacement will be made as soon as equipment and material can be arranged. 8171566,8200 D/PW METRO 434.1519 Agnnda No. Page 2 Agenda 4, klaygrounO, Eau me t In refr,rence to some playground equipment being removed and not reinstalled, some old, less safe equipment was removed in 1985 to be replaced by new equipment funded by a CDBG grant, In 1981, a new modular wood playground unit was purchased for $7,450 and installed by Parks crews at a cost of approximately $1,440. In 1985, $74,337 of improvements were made to the park including playground equipment, picnic shelter, drinking fountain, basketball court resurface, sidewalks, trees, automatic irrigation system, and hydromulohing of bermuda grass seed. In July, 1990, the Park Division worked with the N.I.C.E, group and the Police C.O.P.S, program to provide paint and materials to paint selected playground equipment. We are always seeking volunteer groups and SoDuts to assist in painting playground equipment. New cushio±i sand was added beneath the playground equipment this past Leoember. This is an annual maintenance item. 5. Class in the Park Glass at this park is a continual maintenance problem. Due to the heavy use this park gets from adults, glass bottles are discarded in other than the trash containers. This park gets serviced six days per week for litter pickup and restroom cleaning. We do not have the resources in our budget to give it additional servicing beyond once per day, 6. Ballfield-Lights/Blegchers, Baokstops To our knowledge there are five lights out on the ballfield. This is not a number that will affect the usability of the facility as they are scattered among the six poles. leased on manpower, we currently change light bulbs once per year as needed unless an unsafe condition develops. The ballfield has been rented since March i with no complaints about the lights, One bleacher board was found broken. It has been repaired. The 2x8 boards placed at the base of the backstop were found misaligned. Those will be replaced by a concrete curb as soon as material and manpower can be scheduled. r 7. Sareboard The scoreboard was damaged a number of years ago by lightning destroying the interior electronics. Since the park is used only for practice, we elected not to reactivate the scoreboard due to budget restraints, 8. Tree Limbs Tree trimming is a continual maintenance practice. To our knowledge there are no dangerous tree limbs. The division will be trimming trees this summer on our normal maintenance schedule. a Agenda No._`_~ _QLy , Page - 3 Agenda Ilea S 8410 9. Drinking ours ii C~ The drinking fountain was turned on around the first of March along with the restroom. Some problems with the veUve sticking were noted. The fountain was shut off and parts urdered. It has now been fixed and turned back: on. 10. Sidewalks The CDBG office informs me that no funds have been allocated for sidewalks along Fred Moore Park. Money has been allocated for a sidewalk along Wilson Street between Bradshaw and Ruddell, It is expected to go to bid within the noxt month, 11. American Legion Hall and U S Fl~q The City entered into a 99 year lease with the American Legion Post #840 in July of 1953. The lease specifies that the post must, at its own expense, construct, and traintain any building placed on the property. It also states the; building cannot be leased, sold, or assigned to any other person, firm, or corporation and must be under the control of the American Legion Post #840. The City does not. place flag poles and flags at any of the parks. Major buildings such as recreation centers are equipped with permanent all-weather flags. We have a pole and fle:g at the Martin Luther King, Jr. Recreation Center. 12. `ire Ants Fire ants are a continual maintenance problem at all parks. We treat the areas in a combination of ways with a reproducing sterilant, baits, and quick kill, This time of year, with the wet conditions, the ants are very visible moving to dry, warm conditions, We will continue to attack this problem at this park and all the others as materials and manhours are available. We will be spot treating in anticipation of the Easter Egg Hunt on April 18, 13, Low Mud Snots Low spots appear from time to time in all our parks. Top dressing to level these spots is done as time and material permits. Currently, we are able to do this on athletic areas and where the spots prohibit activity. We do not know of any spots at this time that require immediate attention. 14. Kitchen Area/Restroom The restroom is serviced six days per week and sanitized by using a strong solution of pine cleaner. Public restrooms are extremely difficult to deal with in parks. They are abused and used improperly for reasons that are beyond our comprehension. We do not have the resources to service the Page - 4 Agenda'il~om restroom beyond once per day. The concession area of the restroom is used only in the summer months by the Summer Action Site staff as a storage and program staging area. Painting can be scheduled or volunteers sought to paint the area, however no problems with the current paint exist as the area is used only for storage. 15. Picnic Tables The report of scum on picnic tables was not found. Discoloration due to the tables being out in the elements is evident. We will disinfect all tables with a pine cleaner. 16. Drainage Evesorg Two years ago, a larger drainage ditch was placed through the park as part of the Alexander, Street Drainage Project. Funds were not available to put underground pipes through the park. The underground pipes will be installed in the park in Phase II which was recently approved by CDBG Board in March 1992. 17. No Ei]totrio in Pignig-SheAgT When the new picnic shelter was installed in 1985 near the basketball court, electric service was installed. This is the only park currently in our system with electric in a picnic shelter. An older shelter on the east side of the park does not have electricity. No plans or funds are available to provide power to it. We feel confident this park is maintained at or above the level provided at others the same size. The type of aotivity and use make things often appear unkept between servicing. In our stretched condition to service all areas, we can not give Fred Moore Park more than the onoe per day attention. We will continue to perform the best we can and work with the police, N.I.C.E., and other groups to assist us in this effort. 7 Roberti O Tia ner AJJ0030F ~I , CITY CQUNCII y pppp~000°Q~ G ° ~~~~0 00.'~ ro~,Cp~.. v ~t'QC GCQp0 i i 92-0/4 DATEt 04/21/92 rT~Y CQLtNCIL REPORT B0~ o TOt Mayor and Members of the city council FROMt Lloyd V. Hat;rell, City Ma.aager SUBJECTt DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS RE9MENDATTOW That the issues, ideas, and questions brought out be forwarded to the Zoning Ordinance Task Force for incorporation into the re-write of the zoning ordinancel and/or the Planning and Zoning commission for incorporation into the platting ordinance re-write. SUMMARYt A review of the subdivision (platting) and zoning processes and standarde will be undertaken using the Goldfield zoning and platting proposals. There are three zoning districts in the vicinity of Goldfield, At SF161 and PD48 (see attachment 1). AOHINQ+ Zoning regulates the use of land and buildings on the land. The zoning process is Attachment 2. With "straight" zoning standards, a list of Permit (SUP) are established slot area times dimension tstandards i such Use minimum lot size are set= and building area standarde, such as setback from lot lines and height, are defined as quantified standards. Comparison of permitted area standards for At Sr161 and PD48 is Attachment 3. In terms of residential development area standards, A zoning is more strict than Sr16 or PD48. PD48 allowed large homes to be built, but did not require minimum house size. A list of uses allowed in A and SP16 is Attachment 4. Once property is zoned, it may not be used oontrary to the zoning ordinance without going through the rezoning prooase, a legislative act requiring Planning and Zoning and council action or for nonuse quantified dimension or area standards (like setback) through a variance process. "Usfl" variances, such as retail in a single family distri•ot, are illegal. 8U1lDIVISION/P •a9'TINGf When property within the city limits is subdivided and/or developed, it must be platted. The plat map defines property lines. Platting insures that there is adequate infrastructure to support the proposed dovolopment, that the infrastructure is consistent with master plans which lay out the provision of infrastructure for the entire community, and that the developer pays his share of the infrasteucture casts commensurate with the demand of the proposed development. Lot, dimensions must be consistent with those of the zoning ordinance. For instance, a lot being platted in an 8816 zoning district may not be logs than 160000 square feet. Agenda No. Agenda I,teem_l-z Nto 2 . yJ .Z / Review of plate is s ministerial or an administrative sot. That i state law requires that plate meeting the City's regulations must be approved, See section 212.010 of the Local Government Code, Attachment 5. There has been concern voiced that the Go'.dfleld plat was approved not meeting the requirements of the regulations. Staff and Planning and Zoning commission have not found this to be the case. Property which is unplatted follows the process outlined in Attachment 6. Notice and public hearings are not required. once one or two family zoned or deed restricted land is platted (lot lines defined), it may not be subdivided without replatting, outlineca in Attachment 74 one or two family replete (called residential replete) require notice within the subdivision being replatted, and a public herring. (See Section 212.015 of the Local Government Coda, Attachment 8.) In the Goldfield plat situation, no more than two dwelling units on the 6.4 acre tract may be built, nor any further subdivision may take place without replatting. Lots may be no smaller than one sore without rezoning. 0 RESTRICTIONIs Deed restrictions are private contracts. only Houston is enabled by the state to enforce deed restrictions under its police power authority, Deed restrictions may not violate Fair Housing laws. Thoy often define rigid architectural controls such as roof pitoh, exterior material, and minimum house size. Parties iz1 the contract must own land on which the restrictions apply. Enforcement is by suit in district court, At a neighborhood meeting sponsored by staff, the Goldfield consultants appeared amenable to development of a private contract with neighbors, but no specific suggestions were made by adjoining on nearby landowners, though staff and consultants wore seeking them, ZONING "ORDINANCI RB-bM 2V The Ta►k Force hem recommended the Nixed Use District (MRD) with buffer yards. It is now reviewing design guidelines for site plans and has begun to review residential district standards, Council direction could be made a part of that process. PLATTING PROCESS U -wRITEs In the spring of 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission and Council approved the concepts shown in Attachment 9, A draft ordinance Irepared by the Planning and Development Department has been undergoing legal review since December. Council direction conoerninq platting could be made to staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission, Staff and the Planning and zoning commission, who were briefed on March 26, 1992 wham the 0oldfield final plat was approved, are not rsuggesting more strict regulatory procedures or standards for Goldfield-like development, BACKGROUNDt See Attachment 10. Agenda No. Agenda Ilem~ ze) Dole Development Regulations S~LZ March 31, 1992 Page 3 CROOBUS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFSOTSDI Developers, homebuildera, home buyers. rlA= IMPACTI N/A fully sub tod ~l r P pare S/ L1o d V. Harrell city manager c.~ rank H'. ob ins, TOP Executive Direct r Planning and Development Attuohmentss 1. Goldfield location map 2. Zoning " 31 Zonindistrict comparison 4. A and SF16 uses and standards 61 State standards for plat approval 6. Plat process 7. Replat process of state "residential" replat provisions 91 Platting Process Amendment Summary 10. Goldfield chronology i AAA00628 r: 3 I ATTACHMENT 1 No 0(c63 3NPdVtEY C. POULLALIFIR SURVEY r. 20' DRAkAOE CC 0 60' 100' EASEMENT + WT.,1,, llgLCK.6, .4ENTON-CATHOL~C A051N. I , CAB, H/P 100 P,R. I I Skw, ESIMN rr• ZONED A (CHURCH USE) J 570RM DRAIN INLET 6 S 60'63'42' E 646.30' ; P.OB, ALAN H. GOLDFIELD, at uK (6.427 ACRES ZONED A) o. ° e V LML. ESNN't, V 2906/p 634 ~y n~ SEIB E%ST, ~MZEB~ \ 0 _ 1" + r_ NEW PUBUC ST, ROSY \ 3 E'~ 4 <ci LOT 2 (PROPOSED) \ y > I ~ 11 rail' a ILI (PROPOSED) 40' Ol \ sp' `~ptip !v- 1 + rfq~ E1'3 N 5'i0' W 470.80' ~i 2 pa, 04 ExBT, '`l,°ii,l~ ROY 0. ZONEDI A at ua o g 3 } } COfTAOE "iljj',!?. I (RESIDENTIAL USE) ~u~ 2gA'~ ~ } } ESMpi. vfW 2q.g5 16b 7 tow 111 o 6os~1 8 II 11 y~O 131? , ~qv <i I , t 1~ p~ZONED SF-I6 1 _ iI NICHOLS k CLEARMAN ZONED A g m (AGRICULTURAL USE) f a ✓ Cxis q V611/p1277D,R 7 ' i ' \N r Ri U 'wJ N n3'OT4T" w 61s.7sr MT. d1AYF1 OMMAY 1 I ly ~ A a ~ ~ 4 d ~'i 1~~ J ~L C 1 I Cal z NOMTH 142.24' 4. N ED FIRE RANT 1.1 / = 1 ro 10' DRA"t ESMNT, rl_ UTHMT UBDINIO SOU HMONT LACE, SK ONE v BLOCK 0 NED /P 2D1-4P,/ OA SF4 IEPENNSYLVANIA (50' ROW) : Agenda No. ATTACHMENT 2 Agmda Ilen~_ llJS ZONING 11310 9- 5~ z i L Predesign Conference* Submittal Of Application Staff Review and Comment -me Kaiiing List prepared for 2 oe 0feetywitthiinthhetcity 1 - 4 week limits process Notice Sailed 10 days before public hearing to property owners Within 200 feet Staff XGcoNendation prepared for Plamb q and Soninq Commission 4.t week process P144niM and Z~ulon Public gearing Reeommsndation to approve Reaewtwndstion to Deny Uval Documents are Petitioaer may appeal requested to be praparad Notice in gant= lie'hiarysPr or City Council Public Steering Mam ordinance venial prepar E3 *Rsoommended but not regmiredo po/Soning Agenda Ilem ll1a~✓ lblu ~ - z Attachmeut 3 dl? AREA STAWARDS FOR AGRICULTURE, SINGLF. FA1' MY-16, AND PD-45 ZONING DISTRICTS s ~ o u y` x Minimum Lot Size, SF Detached (000 so 1 Ac, 16 6 V / Minimum Lot Size, SF Attached (000 sf)** NOT 2 NOT ALLOWED ALLOWED Minimum Lot Width, SF Detached 150' 100' 60' Minimum Lot Width, SF Attached NOT 20' NOT ALLOWED ALLOWED Minimum Lot Depth, Residential Use 150' 120' 110' Maximum Building Coverage (By Percent) 20 35 60 Front Setback IV 35 10' Side Setback 15' 10' 8', but many 0, Rear Setback 10' 10' 10' Maximum Height (Stories) 3 2.5 * Lot sizes, setbacks, lot frontages, depths and widths vaiyr PD-45 allows large homes on relatively small lots. PD zoning requires a site plan showing detailed building position and dimensions What Is provided are "typical area features" as provided in the PD-45 zoning case to Council in 1982. SUP required, rev. 4/15/92 i. Ala +1 i l~ 'l konda No. ATTACHMENT 4 A47onda pare 1s_._ Data °W0! __AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT z / PPRMITTED U8E8i Primary Residential Uses One Family Dwelling Detached Educational, Institutional E Sogaial Uses church or Rectory Group Homes Institutions of Religious or Philanthropic Nature Monastery or convent occasional sales Park, Playground or Public Community Center School, Public or Denominational Utility, Accessory and'Inc{dental Uses Accessory Building Electrical Substation Electrical Transmission Line Temporary Field or Construction office (Subject to Approval and 'Control by Building Inspector) Fire station or similar Public Safety Building Gas Transmission Line and Metering station Home occupation off-Street Parking incidental to Main Use Swimming Pool (Private) Telephone Line & Exchange switching or Relay Station Water Reservoir, Water Pumping Station or Well Water Treatment Plant Recreational and Entertainment Uses country Club (Private) with Golf Course Golf Course (Public) Park or Playground (Public) Playfield or stadium (Public) Transportation Relatod Usgs Railroad Track or Right-of-Way Honda No.._~ Agonda item. ZZ)-g AGRXCULTIIRAL DTBTRTCT Data, &9ricaltUral.Ty2e Uses Farm or Ranch Greenhouse or Plant Nursery Hatchery, Poultry IRMTTTEn nova A=T8•APPROVED OPVCIFIC MEN ZOIRMITI Primary Res "oaWA U.!@ Community Unit Development HCrel or Motel Trailer Camp or Mcbile Home Park $duaa tonal Ins i+,+++ + a i d~Uses Art Gallery or Museum Cemetery or Mausoleum College or University or Private School Correctional Facilities Day Camp Day Nursery or Kindergarten School Fairground or Exhibition Area Fraternity, Sorority, Lodge, or Civic Club Halfway House Haze for Care of Alcoholic, Narcotic or Psychiatric Patients Hospital (General Acute Care) Hospital (Chronic Care) Nursing Home or Residence Home for Aged School, Private Primary or secondary school, Business or Trade vY1i~essOrv atld ~noaden ~i fin na community center (Private) Eleatrical Generating Plant Private Utility Shop or Storage Yard Public Building Shop, Yard of Local, state, or Federal Government Radio and Teldvision or Mioro-Wave Tower Off Street Remote Parking Sewaga Treatment Plant c4. Nonda No. ~~z_ AQontl1Qom~ol ua►, AgRIOMLItRAA DISTRICT (continued) Recreational and Entertainment Uses Amusement, commercial (outdoor) Drag Strip or Commercial Racing Go Cart Track Golf course (commercial) Rodeo Grounds Roller or Ice Skating Rink Stable, Private Club', Stable, Commercial Rental Stable, Boarding Swim or Tennis Club Theater, Drive In Transportation Related Uses Airport Landing Field or Heliport Railroad Team Track Retail and Service Type Uses Florist or Garden Shop Greenhouse or Plant Nursery (Retail) Agricultural Tvtie Uses Animal Pound (Public or Private) Animal Clinic or Hospital (with outside runs or pens) Animal Clinic or Hospital (without outside runs or pens) Livestock Auction Livestock Feeding Plant, Pens or Yards Commercial_ Typo Uagn Sand, Gravel or Earth Sales or Storage Scientific or Research Laboratories Natural Resource Storage and Extraction Extraction and Storage of Sand, Caliche, Stone, Clay or Gravel Petroleum or Gas Well Petroleum Colleoting or Storage Facilities Mining or Storage of Mining Wastes { P: Y AwWa No. Agenda lom._WS "All AaRIUQLTUFAL DIBTR,JCT taontinued) Qpggial Industrial Processes Temporary Asphalt or Concrete Hatching Plant Brick Kiln or Tile Plant Cement or Hydrated Lime Manufacture Dump or Sanitary Fill Area ARRA REQUIRMNTBt Minimum Lot Size - 1 Acre - single Family Detached Minimum Lot Width - 150 Feet - single Family Detached Minimum Lot Depth - 180 Feet - For Residential Uses Maximum Building Coverage - (Residential Use) 20% of Lot Area YARD RUDUYRIIMBNTR t Front Yard - 40 feet Minimum side Yard - 15 feet minimum Rear Yard - A minimum of 10 feet from property line 8IQ8T,$j~,AUL11TI0Nt~ f Three (3) stories, except as foliowss Xn the districts where the height of buildings is restricted to two (2) or three (3) stories, cooling towers, roof gables, chimneys and vent stacks may extend for additional height not to exceed forty- five (48) feet above the average ghrade line of the building. Water stand pipes and tanks church steelpes, domes and spires, and school buildings and institutional buildings may be *rooted to exceed three (3) stories in height in residential areaas restricted to two (2) or three (3) stories in height, provided that one additional foot shall be added to the width and depth of side and rear yards for each foot that such structures exceed three (3) stories in height. .j 1,1- LI i` cl MOrlda No, Agenda flem._ ~!81r-16~~ 9in lgryl~l]C UIle _!z ~~.BrsiTTan ns~, Pr Marv Resident at i. One Family Dwelling Detached Church or. Rectory occasional Salem Park, Playground or Public Community Center School, Public or Denominational IT~,~,11ty. Aaa~s@orv and Tncidenta~ Ueee AccesIaory Buildingg Electrical Transmission Line Temporary Field or Conotruaticn Offiele (Subject to Approval and Fire Station or Building Building Gas Transmission Line and Metering Station Home Occupation Off-Street Parkin Incidental to Bain Use Swimming Pool (Private) Telephone Line and Exchanges switching or Relay Station Water Reservoir, Water Pumping Station or Well Reo~4n3~riind F-~er'ta~tlMent UsQs Public Golf Coarse Public Park or Playground T lnsr~orta Reta ed MM Railroad Track or Right-of-Way Artrigill + jjX L Niue Uses Farm or Ranch pl ei it Noels No. Agenda Ilam WIfl -~t~~~~:z . single laaily Icon -i►,god) PERMITTED O8R8 WITS APPROVED 811CIrt g&R PER MITI Primary Residential Uses One Family Dwelling Attached Community Unit Development Educational, ynst ional & special uses Art Gallery or Museum Cemetery or Mausolaum College or University or Private School Day Vamp Day Nursery or Kindergarten School Group Homes Halfway House Institutions of Religious or Philanthropic Nature Monastery or Convent Nursing Home or Residence Home for Aged School, Private Primary or Secondary Utility, AccessoXy and Incidental Usle Electrical Substation Public Building, Shop, Yard of Local, State or Federal Government Radio and/or Televison Microwave Tower Off Street Remote Parking Water Treatment Plant Rgoreational and Entertainment Uses Country Club (Private) with Golf Course Public Playfield or stadium stable, Private Club Swim or Tennis Club Transbortation Rejated U@@R Airport Landing Field or heliport ARIA RZ M L Minimum Lot Sizes 16,000 Single Family Detached 2,000 Single .Fomlly Attached lot, II Agenda NO, APIda llom- _ "BB..=bpi Minimum Lot Widths 100 ft.- Single Family Detached 20 ft.- single Family Attached Minimum Lot Depths 120 feet for Residential Uses Maximum Building coverages 35$ of Lot Area (Residential) ]~8~•.~'iQSL~.61ti~lT~.E Front Yards 35 feet minimum side Yard: 10 feet minimum Rear Yards 10 feet minimum i 8~IG1[T ~daLYmT0~~9! Two and one half (2 1/2) stories except as follows In the districts where the height of buildings i~, restricted to two (2) or three (3) stories, cooling towers, roof gables, chimneys and vent stacks may extend for additional height not to exceed forty- five (45) feet above the average ghrade line of the building. Water stand pipes and tanks church steelpes, domes and spires, and school buildings and institutional buildings may be erected to exceed three (3) stories in height in residential arsaas restricted to two (2) or three (3) stories in height, provided that one additional foot shall be added to the width and depth of side and roar yards for each foot that such structures exceed three (3) stories in height. 1. signs 2. Sighting 3. Landscaping 4,• Parkingg (Based on use. See Article 15) 5. Screening and Fencing .~i iri~,ru•iLwi enda Nn. 222.008 Atl § LOCAILt*~J'?l~M~`R'?^ AOontlallent,._~S__ ~,J._.._.... planning commission, the governing body of the iits extraterritorial jurisdiction, ta~Cing into-ac-- municipality, co' unt access to and extension of sewer and water~~ 2 f Acts 1987, 70th Leg„ ch. 119, 4 1, off. Sept 1, 1987. mains and the Instrumentalities of public utilities; 4 212.009. Approval procedure (3) a bond required under Section 212.0106, If (a) The municipal authority responsible for ap- applicable, is filed with the municipality; and proving Plata shall act on a plat within 80 days after (4) It conforms to any rules adopted under Sec. the date the plat is filed, A plat Is considered don 212'002• approved by the municipal authority unless It Is (b) However, the municipal authority responsible disapproved within that period, for approving plats may not approve a plat unless (b) if an ordinance requires that a plat be ap. the plat and other documents have been prepared as I~ proved by the governing body of the municipality inu by Section 212.0105, (f applicable, addition to the planning commission, the governing Acts 1987, 70th Leg„ ch, 149 4 1, off, Sept 1, 1987, t body shall act on the plat within 80 days after the Amended by Acts 1989, 71st ieg„ ch. 624, 4 8.01, eff, ` I date the plat Is approved by the planning commis- Sept 1, 1989. 1 Chq e e ~I afon or Is consltlered approved by the inaction of the "rho n /.02 of the Seas amenthis A act commission, A plat is considered approved by Local the I changes GoTernment Code, merit t M to Chaska 2i2 and 2,q$ i i to . and to Section 12,002, property Code, t governing body unless it Is disapproved within that apply only nly to a sub eutdirtebn of a tract of land and to an owner of the n I period, tract If the tract Is subdivided on or offer 6eptember 1, IM." a (c) If a plat Is approved, the municipal authority 212 I 4 .0106. Water and Bawer Requirements in i t, giving the approval shall endorse the plat with a Certain Counties It certificate indicating the approval. The certificate 1 i must be signed by; (a) This section applies only to a person who; A (1) the authority's presiding officer and attest- (1) Is the owner of a tract of land In either. I. ed by the authority's secretary; or (A) a county that Is contiguous to an interne. (2) a majority of the members of the authority. clonal border; or 4 (d) if the municipal authority responsible for ap• (B) a county in which a political subdivialon proving plats falls to act on a plat within the pm has received flnaneial assistance through Sub• scribed period, the authority on request shall issue a chapter K, Chapter 17, Water Code;' certificate stating the date the plat was flied and (2) divides the tract In a manner that creates ac that the authority failed to act on the plat within the any lots that are Intended for residential purposes period, The certificate Is effective in place of the and are five acres or less; and endorsement required by Subsection (c), (3) Is required under this re (e) The municipal authority responsible for a subchapter to have a th proving plain shall maintain a record of each appl plat prepared for the subdivision. th cation made to the authority and the authority's (b) The owner of t}te tract u1 action taken on It. On request of an owner of an (1) mltet: act' affected tract, the authority shall certify the rea• sons for the action taken on an application. the (A) Include on the plat or have attached to Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 149, 11, oft Sept. 1, 1987. the plat and u ewerCservice nfacilities that will 4 211.010. 8landarde for Approval be constructed or installed to service the sub& vision and & ,statement of the date by which the t (a) The municipal authority responsible for ap• facilities will be fully operable; and ` proving plats shall approve a plat If: (B) have attached to the plat a document t (1) it conforms to the general plan of the mu• prepared by an engineer registered to practice t nlefpality and its current and future streets, al. In thu state certifying that the water and sewer t leye, parks, playgrounds, and public utility faeill~ service facilities described by the plat or on the tier, document attached to the plat are in compliance i (2) It conforms to the general plan for the ex• with the model rules adopted under Section tenelon of the municipality and Its roads, streets, 16.848, Water Code; or 1i and public highways within the municipality and (2) must b 308 r' A/. AgondaNa. ATTACHMENT 6 Agenda Item_ PLAT Predesign Conference* at G.R.C. Rr Preliminary Flat City Council Decision Submittal** Ir- Final Plat submittal Development Review (including construction Coma~ittaa Recommendation plans) Development Review =adj!&co*Unrvtt*4property sy Notice to Committee Recommendation owners r 100 acres Planning and Zoning Commission Decision Planning and Zoning NNyylar and Copies sub- Commission Reconmenda- mltted and signed for Lion tiling. Notes The entire Development contracts plat process may for public improvements take two nonths, *Unless Waived by Chair of DRC **Properties that do not require submittal of engineering plans may be review by the Planning and zoning Commission using the final plat process only. ATTACHMENT 7 nclontla No. nyentla Ilem_~/_~ REPLAT IR'o Predesign Conference* at D.R.C. Preliminary Plat Development Review submittal** Committee Recommendation Development Review Committee Recommendation Residential*** Replat Planning and zoning property owner notice commission Recommendation Notice to property owner of land within Zoo teat of the replat in the EZZy Council Decision immediately preceding plate it residential use for not more than two units per lot - 15 days prior to the public rinal Plat Submittal hearing. (including construction and Zo plans) Planniosgulsissionninq Recommendation Notes The entire City council decision at replat process may Public Hearing take s months* 1~lylar and copies sub- ■itted and signed for tiling *Unless Waived by Chair of DRc **No Engineering Planst Preliminary and Final Plat may be process together. P&S decides. ***If repplat is in subdivision which was deed restri.ated or zoned for 1 or 2 units per lot$ within last 5 years. Notice goes to subdivision lot owners within ZOO,feet of the replat. 1~rfy1 Agnnd;3 No. ATTACHMENT 8 A;;unrla Ifcm__ S LAND USE & RELATED ACTIVITIES [7a[o ~z~~' ` §212.Qfie_..__e_ W I ¢ 212,014. Replotting Without Vocating preced• or both, For a logal protest, written inetru~et(W " / Ing Plat signed by the owners of at least 20 A replat of a subdivision or part of a subd[vialon area of the Iota or land Immediately adjoining Percent of the the may be recorded and le controlling over the proved. urea covered by the proposed replat and extending a Ing plat without vacation of that plat If the repiat; 200 feet from that area, but within the original (1) Is sighed and acknowledged by only the subd)vialon, must be filed with the municipal plan. owners of the property being replotted; ning commission or governing body, or both, prior (2) Is approved, after a public hearing on the to the close of the public hearing, matter at which parties in interest and citizens (d) In computing the percentage of land area have an opportunity to be heard, by the municipal under Subsection (c), the area of streets and alleys authority responsible for approving plats; and shall be included, (8) does not attempt to amend or remove any (e) Compliance with Subsections (c) and (d) Is not covenants or restrictions, required for approval of a replat of part of a preced. Act. 1997, 70th Lop„ ch. 149, i 1, etf, Sept, 1, 1987. Ing plat it the area to be replotted was designated or reserved for other than single or duplex family Il 212.01b. Additlonat Requirements for certain residential use by notation on the last legally re. E Replats corded plat or In the legally recorded restrictions (a) In addition to compliance with Section 212.014 applicable to the plat, a replat without vacation of the preceding plat must Acs 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 149, 1 1, off, Sept. 1, i984, conform t0 the requirements of this section If., Amended by Ads 1989, 71st Leg, ch. 846, if 2 to 6, off, Aug (1) during the preceding five years, any of the . 28, 1949, area to be replatted was limited by an Interim or 4 212.016. Amending Plat permanent zoning classification to residential use (a) The municipal authority responsible for ap• for not more than two residential units per lot; or proving plats may approve and issue an amending (2) any lot in the preceding plat was limited by plat, which may be recorded and (a controlling over deed reatriotlons to residential use for not more the preceding plat without vacation of that plat, if than two residential units per lot, the amending plat is signed by the applicants only (b) Notice of the hearing required under Section and Is solely for one or more of the following 212,014 shall be given before the 115th day before purposes; the date of the hearing by; (1) to correct an error in a course or distance (I) publication in an official newspaper or a shown on the preceding plat; newspaper of general circulation In the county In (2) to add a course or distance that was omlttad which the municipality Is located; and on the preceding plat; (2) by written notice, with a copy of Subsootlon (3) to correct an error in a real property de- (c) attached, forwarded by the municipal authority sorlption shown on the preceding plat; responsible for approving plats to the owners of (4) to Indicate monuments set after the death, property In the original subdivision, as Indicated disability, or retirement from practice of the engi• on the most recently approved municipal tax roll neer or surveyor responsible for setting monu• or In the case of a subdivision within the extrater• ments; ritorial jurisdiction, the most recently approved (6) to show the location or character of a monu. county tax roll within 200 feet of the property ment that has been changed In location or charoc• upon which the replat is requested, The written ter or that Is shown incorrectly as to location or notice may be delivered by depositing the notice, charavter an the preceding plat; properly addressed with postage prepaid, In a (6) to correct any other type of scrivener or post office or postal depository within the bound. clerical error or omission previously approved by aries of the municipality, the municipal authority responsible for approving (c) If the proposed replat Is protested in accord. plate, Including lot rnumbern, acreage, street once with this subsection, the proposed replat must nsmos, and Identification of adjacent recorded ! recelve, In order to be approved, the affirmative plats; vote of at least three-fourths of all members of the (7) to correct an error In courses and distances municipal planning commission or governing body, of lot lines between two adjacent lots If; 311 E ti r f. PLAMNG PROC S AMENDMENTS SUMMARY v tut T IB PROP08 aD RATIONALE nod plats.' Approved by Planning Staff approval. Planning and toning (P f) New enabling legislation. r lest lot subdivision with end toning. to deny. Eliminate redundancy. Save time, s an ,0ADT and no lior road extensions, r I P with public hearings. Approved by council. P A a eliminate redundancy. Sava time, ~ N v("jo final Plate. Approved by P a a. P i t ' 2T P161ignary plate, )tpproved by Council. Staff Eliminate redundancy, gave time. Preliminary plat with city Approved by Council. Council Mo change. Council should know participation, about end approve funding in support of development. 1. Variances Approved by Council. P i t Eliminate redundancy, Save time. d. General Development Plans (GDP's) Approved by P a Z. P A I No change, S. Development on a mingle tract Required to plat, Platting not requited. Equity and fairness. Infra- ~O subdivided prior to January 1, approved by P a 2 struoture in place, 1960 (before Denton had or Council. nubdlvislon regulations). 5. Single family or duplex develop- Required to plat, Required to plat. No further exactions. Developmenh exactions only to ment on a single tract with approved by P a E, meet need generated, streets, utilities, and drainage in place. P. Additions or alterations to an Pequired to plat, Platting not required, DOVOI%a#Mt #%action$ only to existing building, no drainage, Approved by P i t, meet need. Property lines are street, utility, additional park- known ing, curb cut, or street sccess changes needed. - 1Slk/1 7 3sh4•d!'.'1. l 1 \~1 PLATTING PROCESS ANN""ENTS SUMMARY RATIONALE--- 18 PROPOSED ~ w A - Attorney General opinion 11101. Platting and elections platting not required. ~8 Vb I Lion or development In the required. Approved by cv erritorlel jurtedlctlon, on a P L t or C°unetl, 5M1 ted. rood, no utility extensions Develo" At not Yet ooou[14n9, V` n ce, ary. Conveyance plat, No exactions. elections not moessary• Conveys Platting end exactions information to talon, n0 development, inside roved by Inf0rsational notes on the plat final Platting 9 land sale. Lot requited. ApP about requirements for final plot buyers. o ty lelts (tCL), p a = or council. and poanltrle exactions. z ze tween 5 and 39.9 acres' fired. No demand lot infrastructure. n buildings so lot line■ not neou- m 10 and exactions Platting not r°~ otlalion e w sary. 40 ecru from A" { jWbdptision, no development [c L, platting roved by between developers and THE, in lend sale. Lot alas 40 or more ec[es. required. council. 1989. The smaller the tract, 4M else of larger tract, 39.9 to 20 ac res. nearer Wilding is Ilk ly 0 If no development, land 4s1e, to start, and ictrastructure 11, Subdivision to out out a piece of a Final m pcutlat on , tract eral _ ODp requited on larger treat needs are Closter. larger treat owned by one, within Development Plan {GDP) _ Conveyance plat, if 'cut out. is extraterritorial Jurisdiction of on larger treat. at least 5 Batas in size. city. _ Final plot, it 'cut out' is lose than 5 rare.. it development on out out. General Development Plan on larger tract - Final plat on 'out out' Implements long range size of larger troctf 40 + Acres. planning in private Bettor, if no development - platting not required if development on 'cut out' - GDP larger tract - final plat on 'out out. 1.851/4 i i FSh 4a':4'. I PLATTING PROCESS AMENDMINTS SD "My AT \ VVV IS PROPOSIA AATIONALs Z2 l Development plan data required. General nevelopment 19.9 Acres or Less t~ Plan Preliminary plat on larger treat .yV final plmt it development or conveyance plat, If no development. 1 Add average dally traffic and storm comprehensive infrastructure water run-off data, Could be provided impact analysis and long range by staff, planning. G r nl Q1, Zt1g1e 21. Redevelopment on existing lots or sidewalks may be Sidewalks not required. Assessment Incou nga lnfill.' sidewalks tract exactions. exacted. Regular program phrase eliminated. added to list of inf[sstueture essessment program not required. Md 'regular mentioned. assessment program.* I/. Ascending plate to correct errors. Not mentioned in Allow as stated in state enabling Iowa. Consistency with enabling laws. regulations. 15. 'Residential' replat notice. To all lots within sub- Notice to lot owners within 200 feat and consistency with enabling laws. division, unless more within subdivision boing replatted, Add than 100 lots, than 20a rule and super-majority rule In notice to $00 foot acoordanco with state enabling Iowa radius. 16. Public Improvement guarantees. Required before building Require before building can begin. Applicable to ITJ Platting where Permit is issued. building permits ors not issued, '851k/S .I j <t ^i ii Agenda No. - Q/ Z Unto ATTACHMXNT 10 GOLDFIELD CHRONOLOGY Nov. 7, 1991: Predesign with DRC. Discussed platting in 10A zoning district. P&Z scheduled for 5 Dec. 91. Dec. 2, 1991: Meeting between Robbins and Mrs. Goldfield. Discussed requirements for platting, private streets in PD's and rezoning and platting process, Dec. 110 1991: Meeting with architect, Robbins, City Manager, and Mrs. Goldfield, DRC comments conflrmea. Dec. 260 1991: DRC reviews preliminary plat and PD Detailed Plan. Jan. 2, 1992: DRC reviews preliminary plat and detailed plan. Jan. 8, 1992: P&Z tables detailed plan and preliminary plat. Feb. 5, 1992: staff sponsored neighborhood meeting at city Nall, Feb. 60 1992:, DRC reviews preliminary plat and detailed plan. PD zoning application withdrawn. Feb, 12, 1992: P&Z postpones at applicant's request consideration of preliminary plat. Feb, 200 1992: DRC review preliminary plat. Feb. 26, 1992: P&Z recommends approval of preliminary plat. Feb. 28, 1992: Final plat submitted for review. March 3, 1992: Motion to approve dies, no second. Council voted to consider preliminary plat on March 17th. March 17, 1992: Council approves preliminary plat. March 24, 1992: Council member asks for review and possible new regulation. March 25, 1992: P&Z approves final plat. Briefed on Council briefing to be made on April, AXX00142 !i l G' CITY COUNC T L i L i L PFFF ~pppb44p ~ ~ c` 0 o ti ~~d~44 H < pOpp~o - ocaGCao i f 1 I LOA 0 0 Agenda Date April 22, 1992 PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD AGM;DA ITEM TO; CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD FROM: R. E. NELSON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES RE: CONTRACT WITH UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT FOR INTERIM TREATED WATER SERVICES AND RAW WATER 1RECCa2=AT.=: The Utility Staff recommends approval of the contracts subject to legal review. The contracts were presented to the Public Utilities Board for consideration at the April 10 1992 meeting. 'rhe Board expressed concern that the contracts were generally unbalanced in favor of the District. Staff was able to satisfactorily address the general concerns such as the requirement for Denton's five year lead time for non-renewal notification. However, the Board was not agreeable to the projected net income reduction in 1994 and 1995, even though the projected net income through 1998 would be $2,253,000 higher. Staff was directed, to continue negotiations with the District. Two alternatives were considered for increasing revenues in 1994 and 1995. These were to adjust either the take or pay amount or the price structure. Since the pricing will vary considerably from year to year, the option to adjust the take or pay amount, was selected. A sliding scale concept was adopted as indicated in the following table. 1 yn ,A'f 1L r. I Agonda No. Page 2 Agonda Ilem., /a1s ?o1~. 'VET REVE~F,i, M ~ /D WATER SLIDING SCALE CURRENP BAR TAKE_Qg 60k TAKE WHOLESALE PA CONTRACT ($1000) ($1000) ($1000) 1993 NA 504 604 604 1994 70 551 472 617 1995 70 661 566 624 1996 60 656 703 0 1997 55 783 839 0 1998 95 $$l TOTAL $4,136 $40128 $1,845 The projected net income for 1994 is still short by ;66,000, it is up by 037'000 in 1995 and the six year total is up by Tom Taylor, General Manager, indicates that an initial load factor Of 70 percent will be difficult, but possible. Depending upon how other water supply arrangements develop, the load factor for later years could be significantly higher. He purposely used the lower or conser•rutive volume projections in order to not overstate the sales potential. If events come together faster than projected then the volume sales would be much higher. The contracts provids long term net revenues and protect Denton's short term concerns as well as avoid a large sudden drop in net revenues whon Corinth and LCh.VA transfer to the District. The two contracts provide for temporary raw water at 85 percent of Dallas price, Denton has first opportunity to sell raw water, a 55 cent treatment/transmission service fee, variable cost, a sliding scale of peak day request which includes raw water price and service fee'iv, and long term transmission service priced for full cost of service on the utility basis. Key elements of the contracts are listed in Exhibits I and II. I e Agenda No. ! Agenda Item_ZdS _ r off ~D Page 3 Through 1996, the date the District plans to have a water plant completed, the accumulative net revenues will be $2,291,000 higher from the District than if Denton continues with current contracts with Corinth and LCMUA (See G)ihibit III.) Net revenuers from sale of raw water could continue through 2010. The two reductions in annual net revenues are anticipated, one in 1994 is a result of Corinth & LCMUA transferring to the District„ and one in 1999, when the District's treatment plant is completed and the District begins purchasing raw water only. Postponing related major capital improvements, such as the Lake Ray Roberts Water Treatment Plant is another benefit to Denton's association with the agreement. BACKdROMM i The proposed agreement provides four major benefits for Denton: 1, Avoids major revenue drop when Corinth and LCMUA transfer to the Di€trict, 2. Higher total net revenues. 3. Continued additional net revenues through 2002. 4. Postpone major capital improvements. Corinth could conceivably transfer to the District as early as May 30, 1995. Their existing contract requires a five year notification f or termination. Denton supported the development of the District anticipating that the District would serve Corinth & LCMUA. The District was created by the Texas legislator on June 16, 1989, and Corinth became a participating member in 1990. Corinth could argue that the five year period began when they became a participating member, and that the transfer could be completed after May 30, 1995, providing that the District has the pipeline facilities necessary to serve Corinth. f II Agenda No. Page 4 Agendaltem_4JS ~f cY-W !D These are scheduled 'o be in place by May 30, 1994. entered into an intea-im water contract with Denton with the understanding that they would be a a Denton Water Plant as soon as service was availablet tDe encouraged LCMUA to participate with the District foor r wat water er service. If the District were to contract with competing water suppliers, such as Dallas, to provide services by May 30, 1994, Denton's net revenue would drop by $66,000 instead of the projected $145,000. Corinth plans to add a well and reduce their dependency upon Denton, The District is planning improvements to serve additional members. Due primarily to volume differences, the total Interim Period net revenues from the District is projected to be $2,291,000 higher than those projected if the District were to serve Corinth and LCMUA by options other than Denton's resources. The District is making arrangements for several sources of raw water. The District has agreed to utilize Denton's available raw water before any other raw water resource and they have agreed to access other sources as Denton's available supply diminishes. In return, the price of raw water is set at 85 percent of the price charged by Dallas. This is projected to provide Denton ;vith additional net revenues through 2012, Linder current contracts, Denton has agreed to consider including Corinth Is and LCMUAIa future needs in their planning of capital improvements. By Corinth and LCMUA transferring to the District their future supply will be available for Denton. Major capital improvements can be postponed. S t" `Fftiq rj 4{londa No. JAI-- Aponda Itam~S Page Page 5 Wto 5 a,P is Submitted BY: BUJ R.E. Nets n Prepared By: Executive Director of Utilities Ldle' K. Allison, Director Water Engineering and operations Approved Byr E. Nel on Executiv Director of Utilities Exhibit T: Interim Treatment/Transmission Contract Key Elements Exhibit ITs Temporary Raw Water Contract Key Elements Exhibit III: Net Revenue Projection MWDFU8JrM ~t s, a dgendu No. -~,-„Q~ .r Agenda Item. 4L " _ EXHIBIT I W10 /CJ DENTON/UTRWD INITIAL PERIOD WATER TREATMENT & TRANSMISSION KEY ELEMENTS • Initial Period 6 Year (Treatment) • Transmission Term 20 Years - 20 Year Lxtension/UTRWD Option 5 Year Notice Prior to Option • Transfer Corinth/LCMUA 1995 • Delivery (2,5 MGD to 4.50 MGD) • UTRWD Supply Raw Water • Guaranteed WTP Capacity - 4.50 MD • Sliding Scale Take or Pay • Water Treatment Rate Structure Variable Costs $ .45 Service Fee Raw Water (25V Dallas Price) • Water Transmission Rate Structure (Initial. Period) Variable Costs 10 service Fee • Water Transmission Rate Structure (Lang-Term Service) 0 & M Pumping & Energy Depreciation Rol (9,5*) Street Rental Fee (4* of Transmission Costs) ty-014VPG~ E' Y 6 r.. Agonda No. 02 Agendillom A) S EXHIBIT II Wlu J ~ /D DENTON/UTRWD INTERIM WHOLESALE RAW WATER SALES KEY ELEMENTS • Temporary Sale • Denton Protects Water Rights • Periodic Offer - 85t Dallas Price/No UTRWD Board Action - 854'+ Dallas Price/UTRWD Board Action Required • First Opportunity - UTRWD Used Denton Water First • 6 WD Guarantee/10 Years • 20 Year Term 20 Year Renewal Option 5 Year Denton Notice V 'I • "I. it EXIBIT III Aganda No. Agenda Item_ LCJS~_ DENTON/UTRWD We '~jr---YtL- INTERIM TREATED AND RAW WATER NET REVENUE PROJECTIONS 8;~ io APRIL 17,19M UTRWD CONTRACT CURHENT WHOLESALE WITH SLIDING SCALE TAKE OR PAY L_ CONTRACTS WATER PEAK DAY CONTRACT CUM NET AVE DAY/ NET CUM NET YEAR REQUEST REVENUES REVENUES PEA, K DAY REVENUE REVENUES (MGD) ($1000) ($1000) (MGD) ($1000) 1000) 1994 1.60 604 604 1.00/1.60 604 604 N 19(34 2.25 551 1,155 1.00/1.65 617 1,221 T E 1995 2.70 661 11816 1,00/1,70 624 1,645 R 1 1996 3135 656 2,472 1.0/1.75 639 2,484 M 1987 4.00 783 3,255 1.00/1.85 663 3,147 1998 4.50 881 4,136 1.00/1.95 687 3,834 _ UTRWD WATER TREATMENT PLANT COMPLETE 1998 5.00 745 4,18 R 2000 5150 819 51700 A W 2001 5.80 $64 61564 W 2002 6.10 908 7,472 A T 2003 6,40 953 6,425 E R 2004 6.70 998 9,423 2005 7.00 11042 10,465 2006 7.80 1,132 11,597 2007 8.20 1,221 12,818: 2008 8.80 1,310 141128 2006 9,40 1,0 150528 2010 1040 11489 17,017 Agenda No. _ fig. 41ZZ Agenda ilan, k -So <~o EXCERPT MINUTES- PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD April 22, 1992 50 REVIEW AND CONSIDER CONTRACT BETWEEN UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF DENTON. Nelson introduced this item advising the the re-negotiated price is 858 of what the City of Dallas charges, Denton's water attorneys have concluded that this is representative enough to protect Denton's water rights and has the flexibility that it can fluctuate from year to year. Allison reviewed the costs with Board on the contract indicating that after extensive negotiation with the UTRWD, he feels the rates are reasonable. Coplen made a recommendation Viat the Board accept the contract as written, However, +Ie further recommended that staff figure out a way to balance the books in the water department for 1994 and 1995 so that the Utility won't be finding it necessary for a rate increase due to this contract. Thompson concurred. He stated that the utility cannot-reset YaIf'G rates to its customers based on other cities' needs for water. The motion as made was seconded by Frady. Laney asked if the water we are selling will still be surplus water after 1999. Nelson replied yes, unless Denton growth is explosive. If the growth of the city does require it, the contract can be amended. Laney expressed concern that if the growth in the Denton community is explosive, then there will be gr.estions over whoso water this is. Coplen commented that only riurplus water is being sold. He indicated his concerns were the same as Laney's; however legal counsel has advised and evidence has been shown that the utility is only selling surplus water at a reduced value, and this is the key to protection of Denton's water rights. Nelson noted that the UTRWD has a contract with the City of Dallas, but they have not opened that contract yet,, and won't until Denton cannot furnish their needs. Nelson observed that Denton now has 11 MGD for. Denton's use at a population of 66,0001 Denton uses 10 MGD. There is 24 MGD in Lewisville Reservoir and Ray Roberts, plus 2 MGD in Cooper Reservoir. Therefore, Denton can increase population to 155,000 before being out of water. With water conservation measures, Denton could support a higher population than that. Thompson called for a vote. Ali ayes, no nays, motion MMMMM~ triUd. r:': f 9] ZC i Agenda No. -0 Agenda Ilem_Ze) S #Z (kilo carried. 16 Y Ap Coplen went on to L-equest that staff explain to the City Council that the biggest concern the Board has is 4 the 858 legality issue. The rest of the contract is as fair as the Board and staff know how to get it. The Board does not want to end up with Denton becoming a regional supplier. Nelson stated he would ask the City Attorney to double check with the Austin Attorney to assure Denton's rights. Thompson emphasized that Denton does want to help the neighboring cities as much as possible; Denton fathered the district in a sense and hopes the other cities prosper under this contract as well y tj 4 F RCIT COUNCII i f~ T.. I ooOC~OQpol10G O~~ofG' n Gp~' ~ 7 Q j 0 ~~~dp~QQ!N YbOCO00~0 all i~ e r~'V41 j' ~i Agenda No, Agenda IIum~~ Date C1rY• of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MoKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: Sandra White, Municipal Judge Harlan L. Jefferson, Director of Treasury operations DATE: April 24, 1992 SUBJECT: APRIL UPDATE ON COURT PROCEDURES For the second time, Judge White and I have combined our efforts to develop a progress report on the recent changes in the Municipal Court. We have reviewed the status of the recommendations for the "Warrantless-On Site Arrest" and "Request for Warrants, Traffic Cases and others" categories in the Municipal ,judge's February 14, 1,992 memorandum. We also reviewed other applicable recommendations that arose after February 14, 1992. Since our last update report :indicated that virtually all of the recommendations that fell in the abc,ve mentioned categories have been implemented, this report shall only address those recommendations that have unresolved issues related to them or those that have quantifiable progress data that can be reported. Our evaluation is as follows: 1. JUDICIAL RXQOIRBNSNTIRIXONNENDATION: Presentation of warrantless on-site arrest affidavit, to be sworn to in the Magistrate's presence, setting forth sufficient facts to establish probable cause for the arrest and continued detention of the accuses. Status: The Police Department is complying with this requirement. The list below is a breakdown of the total number of affidavits for warrantless arrests that were presented to a magistrate since February 20, 1992. We separated them according to the City Magistrates and County Magistrates. CITY MAGISTRATE No. Probable Cause Found 223 88.14 Probable Cause Not Found _ 30 1 86 Total ~0. 8171566-8200 D/P'W METRO 434.2529 .1 Monda too. rr1~_ Wto Memo to Lloyd V. Harrell April 24, 1992 Page 2 COUNTY MAGISTRATE No. Probable Cause Found 68 100 Probable Cause Not Found 0 0 Total Many of the cases in which probable cause was not found were arraignsd soon after we implemented the new procedures. Since our March 23, 1992 report, probable cause was not found in 15 cases, and most of these resulted because a probable cause affidavit was not filed. 2. JUDICIAL ZZWOZRSHSNTIR8C0!!UNDATZON: No formal charging document needed. Status: The filing of a sworn complaint on Class C Misdemeanor on-sight jail arrests was to be disbannedj however, there remains the problem of having a complaint filed in situations where the defendant must be brought to Court within a few days because he/she has been unable to post bond. They could be released on PR Bond if no other solution could be found. The prosecutor and the Judge are to examine this problem and solutions thereto. 3. JODZCrAL R8QUZRBNBNT81RsCoMVEN0ATZON: After a Defendant for a traffic case fails to appear to answer charge--recommend that a computer generated postcard be sent to advise Defendant he has neglected ticket. Allow specific time to make an appearance after postcard notice--than begin warrant application process. status: From the date we started complying with this recommendation, 2038 notices have been sent to Defondants. The chart below illustrates the response rata to those notices. Notices Mailed # of Responses $ T~r 21038 514 25.2 Of the 514 responses which resulted in payment, we collected $22,532.72. This compares to only $5,641.00 collected from the 522 warrants issued since March 4, 1992. In addition warrants have not been actively served since April 15, 1992 because of the amnesty program being in effect. r c <'j _11L - Nonda No, Agenda item S gyp,,' C' halo L Memo to Lloyd V. Harrell April 24, 1992 Page 3 4. TUDrCrAr, RRQOIRENAWTIRSCOKKENDATION: officer appears at Clerk's office to fill out affidavits-- not computer generated with statutory language, but only pre-formed heading and conclusion (officer fills in facts in body), signs in Magistrate's presence, at time Magistrate makes determination of PC or not, and warrant signed at same time if PC found. (No need for Clerk Affidavit.) There may be ability to incorporate an affidavit into ticket writing process, but would still be signed in front of Magistrate. Status: Since early March, Police officers have presented probable cause affidavits to the Magistrate at scheduled times, in terms of the officers salary, the cost of this activity as of April 23, 1992 was $2,562. Of the time Police officers have spent in the courtroom presenting affidavits, forty-four point five (44.5) hours have been on duty and sixty-eight (68) have been over- time hours for a total of one hundred twelve: ,point five (112.5) hours. This involved fifty-two different officers. The Attachment is a list of the officers, the number of hours spent in the courtroom, and the overall cost for officers to sign affidavits in the courtroom. The financial and time burden on Police officers has been limited because the Word Processing Center is typing many of their affidavits, However, the assistance of the Word Processing Center has produc0d more affidavits than the Magistrate can process, This process creates more affidavits being presented to the Magistrate than can be handled in a two hour time period. 5. JUDICIAL RSQUIRENEWTIRSCONNSNDATION: Magistrate/Judge will make self available at certain times for Peace Officer, Traffic and Clerk affidavits in location to be determined such as the Courtroom or preferable an area accessible to a word processor to generate warrant at tims of PC finding to get backlog done or redone, Magistrates will make additional time available for processing and PC determinations. Part-time Judges schedules must be consider in light of their other private practices. Status: We are complying with this recommendations. The schedule is Monday from 7:00am to 9:00am, Wednesday from 2:00pm to 400pm, and on Friday from 3:00pm to 5:OOpm. Because the Monday session is the least; productive of the three, we plan to make some adjustments in the schedule to better accommodate all parties involved. G t Agenda No. Agenda Item/a2j- ` . C. / Lulu.-r~~_9L _ Memo to Lloyd V. Harrell l/ a April 24, 1992 Page 4 6. MUNICIPAL JanaB/ST." RECOMMENDATION: During the period from April 15, 1992 through May 4, 1992 that the Municipal Court have an "amnesty" on all citations. Status: The amnesty program was implemented as scheduled. Even though the program has received good local advertisement, the response has been minimal thus far. Of the more than 6,000 eligible cases, we have received 60 responses which resulted in $3,435.75 being collected. We are hopeful that more Defendants will resolve their case during the latter part of the program. More cases are normally processed during the last two ( 2) days of amnesty programs than all the pervious days combined. Attempts are being made to advertise the amnesty program in the metroplex to enhance response during the last week of the amnesty program. i If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sandra White Harlan L. an Municipal Nudge Director/, r asury Operations. HJ:lb AFF00242 ATTACHMENT agenda No. Adonda Ittrma) may, GJ. AFFADAVIT SIGNING PROCESS FROM MARCH 4, TO APRIL 23 OVBR- ON- OFF- IsADDId HOURLY 7AAJd DUTY DUTY TY TOTAI. OPFJCER I RATE IIATIR HOURS: HOUM' HOURS 1 Atcbepe, Tim 39 15.27 22.91 1.0 _ 010 _ 1 0 2 Beaidoo, David 66 12.69 19.04 2.0 2,0 3 Bewvldm, Syivla _ 44 15,27 22.91 10.5 3,5 4 Bem l' David 119 12.06 18.12 _ 1.0 _ 1.0 5 B_tufner, Mike 9 17.06 25..W 0.5 I.3 2,0 6 Binkerl, Dsk Y51 12,69 19.04 T 0.5 0.5 1.0 7 Blo tack, Bryon 16 14.74 2211 7.0 7.0 6 Boyd$". D04 13 14.02 21.03 2,0 210 9 Brett, Jame$ 65 12.69 19.0{ 0.5 0.5 1.0 10 Brown, Jlmmk r A63 13.3_4 20,01 0.5 0.5 1.0 11 Bryan, James 21 12,69 19.04 1.0 2.0 3.0 12 bah, JIM 61 _ 15,27 22.91 _ 1.0 0.5 1.3 13 CaAeel, Paul 66 12.69 19.04 _ 2.0 0.5 2.S 14 CoWW. Daotel 26 12.69 _ 19.04 ^ 0.5 1.0 13 15 Copelmd, Cn{I 114 13,4 20.01 _ 1.0 ~OA 1.0 16 Cnts, Gary 51 15,27 22.91 9.0 930 17 Codia, Brad _ 117 13,34 _ 20.01 1.0 010 1.0 11 Doir"r, Jim _ 304 13.36 _ 20.34 ~0.0 1.0 _ 1.0 19 Fylky, Doe 29 iS.27 22,11 0.5 0.5 1.0 20 Envia, Joe 27 13,34 20.01 1.0 1.0 21 Poster, Rusty 115 13.34 20.01 0.0 1.5 1.5 22 OrelYKd, lope _ 31 12.08 18.12 _ 2.5 _ 2.5 23 Ourels, VIBinta 22 12.69 19.04 o.s 0.5 24 H&x*m Olllis 70 15.27 22.91 ` 0,0 _ 2.0 2.0 23 HoASReW, berek 26 _ 12.08 18.12 1,5 1.5 26 H*". Ore" 24 14,74 _ 22,11 1.5 1.3 27 Hksolom, Orw* 111 14.02 21,03 _ 0.0 2.0 2,0 21 Jaokm, too 157 7.72 11.38 0.5 0,0 0.3 29 lwepo, hl. 20 14.02 21.05 0.0 2.0 2.0 30 Jotmpn, Roo 14 12,69 19.04 210 2.0 31 Kidwell, Todd 40 1169 19,04 2.0 0.0 2.0 32 Kromee6erter, Kevin 32 12.00 18.12 2,0 _ 0.0 2.0 3J Lot e, Oros 122 12.06 It 2 2.0 34 Lee, Bryce 67 12.01 _--Si. 12 0.0 2.0 V 1 0 35 Moak, Alvia 33 _ 13.34 20,01 0.5 ` 0,0 0.5 36 WCWIWO. Paul 46 13.27 W 22,91 1.5 0.0 1,3 37 Moon, fhry 45 15.27 22.91 1.0 W 1.0 31 M4gm, 7aoe ~ 125 12.00 56.12 ~ 1.0 _ 1.0 39 Nivon, Troy _ 111 _ 14.02 21.03 1.3 23 4.0 40 PadlRo, But 37 1314 20.01 1.0 2.0 _ 310 41 1Ly, Dobby 311 14,02 21.03 0.0 TO 2,0 42 5diltr, Jay 42 15,27 21191 2.0 0.0 2,0 43 dumped, Brian i 123 12.06 11,12 _ 10 0.0 2.0 44 Smith_Kelih so 13.34 20.01 3.0 _0.5 3.5 45 Bteadum, Damy 124 12.06 11.12 0.3 0.5 46 Stock4rd, Mike 23 14,74 22.11 1.0 1,0 47 swaftem, Cbrlom ~4 14.02 21,03 1.0 3.0 41 Taylor, wokael 3S 14.02 21.03 1.0 1.0 49 Tlieoclm, BI11 1S 14.02 21.03 OA 3.0 3.0 30 Turner, Mark 120 12.04 11.12 0,5 0.3 51 Weber, Lee 14.02 21.03 0.0 3.5 3.3 $2 Woods, Tom 7 17.06 23.39 1.0 0,0 110 TtYfALB 441 61.0 1124 TOTAL COST FOR OFFICERS SIONU40 APFIDAVITS IN TH 9 COURT ROOM INCLUDES, ON•DUTy WA0M, OVER-TIME WADES, INSURANCE, WORKBR'S COMP„ TMRS, AND PICA =2,562 ti ii CITY COUNCII y oood~aaooo 0°°0 { oooao oooo~o ti x odQOO .ti r * * ^O~Vo °0° o a c o c c a Q o°° J HANDOUTS GIVEN TO COUNCIL 4-28-92 INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT OF 1991 OVERVIEW Increased Funding Roadway t 40% Transit T 100% More Flexible Programs Increased MPO Role in Programming Funds Congestion Management Element Expanded Transportation Boundary Links Transportation and Air Quality MPO REQUIREMENTS Long-Range Plan Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) i congestion Management Plan Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) z TRANSPORTATION AND AIR QUALITY PLANNING AREAS NONATTAINMENT U 'lr AREAa f. 4' ! w 3 Y~ t'y t 'j r KWALL PARKER . f / KAUFMAN METROPOWTAN PLANNING AREA JOHNSON E" TIP PROJECT SELECTION Transit: MPO°"SU't - > Transportation Authorities NHS: TxDOT Cooperate MPO Surface and Congestion: MP O Consult TXDOT TRANSIT PROGRAM Section 3: Discretionary $12 Billion Nationally (8% Overall) Formulam, $18 Billion Nationally (12% Overall) Section 9: Urban Public Transportation Section 16: Elderly and Disabled/Nonprofit Section 16: Rural Public Transportation Federal Share capital 80/20 Operating 50/50 (Section 9 Only) 5 CONGESTION AIR QUALITY PROGRAM Nonattainment Areas Air Quality Plan $f Billion Nationally (5% Overall) Federal Share 80/20 6 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM Consolidates Primary, Secondary, Urban $32 Billion Nationally (20% Overall) Federal Share 80/20 Flexible Use: Management - Infrastructure POLICY ORGANIZATION Federal Law Governor Metropolitan Planning Organization (NCTCOG) Regional Transportation Council B Regional Transportation Council Ed Galllgan, Chairman George Kemble Councilmember Fort Worth Transportation Authority City of Grand Prairie Dottie Lynn Art Martin, Vice Chairman Mayor Pro Tem Deputy Mayor Pro Tom City of Arlington City of Plano Morris Matson Lee Walker, Secretary Councllmember Commissioner City of Fort Worth Denton County Morris Fairrlsh Jim Alexander Councilrr,3mber Councilmember City of Irving City of Denton Chris Samos Mika Anderson Commissloner Councllmember Dallas County City of Mesquite Gary Slagei Jerry Bartos Mayor Councilmember City of R'chardson City of Dallas Bob Smith Robert Dollorhide Councilmember Mayor Pro Tern City of Garland City of Watauga Grady Smithey Domingo Garcia Councllmember Councilmember City of Duncanville City of Dallas J. R. Stone Milburn Gravley District Engineer Mayor TxDOT, District 2 City of Carrollton Charles Tandy Donna Halstead Councilmember Councilmember City of Dallas City of Dallas Tom Vandergriff Bob Hampton County Judge Commissioner Tarrant County Tarrant County Virginia Nell Webber Jack Hatchelf Mayor Pro Tom Commissioner Clty of Fort Worth Collin County Henry Wilson James Huffman Councllmember District Engineer City of Hurst TxDOT, Dlstriot 16 Mark Wolfe Jim Jackson Mayor Commissioner City of Coppell Dallas County Vacant Jim Jenne Ellis County Dallas Area Rapld Transit 9 Vacant Johnson County 1991-92 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM Regional Transportation Plan Implementation Regional Congestion Management Air Quality Planning Regional Aviation Planning Local Government Technical Assistance 10 PARTNERSHIP IN REGIONAL. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING Recrlonal Transportation Executive Board Air Caller Council Policy Committee Highway Air Transportation Air Carrier Public Transportation Technical Technical Advisory Technical Committee Technical Committee Committee Committee Travel Demand Railroad Management Task Force Task Force RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DESIGNATION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS AS THE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION FOR THE URBANIZED AREAS OF DENTON AND LEWISVILLE Rfq WHEREAS, the Governor of Texas, in April 1974, designated the North Central Texas Council of Governments as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for transportation planning for the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan region in accordance with Section 112 of the Federal- Aid Highway Act of 1973 (Public Law 98-47); and, WHEREAS, the 1990 Census has designated Denton and Lewisville as urbanized areas; and, WHEREAS, the cities of Denton and Lewisville have requested the Governor of the State of Texas to designate the North Central Texas Council of Governments as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the urbanized areas of Denton and Lewisville for ongoing urban transportation planning, and WHEREAS, the cities of Denton and Lewisville make up more than 75 percent of the urbanized area totat population, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED: Section-1 That the Executive Board of the North Central Texas Council of Governments, amIng by and for the cities of Denton and L.ewisvllle, does hereby express the support for the designation by the Governor of Texas of the North Central Texas Council of Governments as the Metropoiltan Planning Organization for the Denton and Lewisville urbanlaed areas, Sectlon 2. That the Executive Director of the North Central Texas Council of Governments Is authorized to execute an agreement with the Governor's office, or their designee, for designation of the Nonh Central Texas Council of Governments as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Denton and Lewisvllle urbanized areas, 12 Section 3, That this resolution shall be In effect Immediately upon its adoption, IM Alexander, President North Central Texas Council of Governments Councllmember, City of Denton I hereby certify that this resolution was adopted by the Executive Board of the North Central Texas Council of Governments on March 26, IM, D yle, ~Seratary c reasurer North Central Texas CouncU of overnments Mayor, City of Desoto 13 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DESIGNATION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS AS THE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING FOR THE URBANIZED AREAS OF DENTON AND LEWISVILLE WHEREAS, the Governor of Texas, In April 1974, designated the North Central Texas Council of Governments as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for transportation planning for the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan region in accordance with Section 112 of the Federal-Ald Highway Act of 1973 (Public Law 98.67); and, WHEREAS, the 1990 Census has designated Denton and Lewisville as urbanized areas; and, WHEREAS, the Cities of Denton and Lewisville hs;•re requested the Governor of the State of Texas to designate the North Central Texas Council of Governments as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the urbanized areas of Denton and Lewisville for ongoing urban transportation planning; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED: Section 1. That the Regional Transportation Council of the North Central Texas Council of Governments, acting by and for the Cities of Denton and Lewisville, does hereby express support for the designation by the Governor of Texas of the North Central Texas Council of Governments as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Denton and Lewisville urbanized areas. Section 2, That this resolution shall be forwarded to the Governor's Office with a request to amend the Metropolitan Planning Organization agreement currently in effect between the Governor's Office of the State of Texas and the North Central Texas Council of Governments, dated August 26, 1986, to include the Denton and Lewisville urbanized areas. 14 Section That MPO designation shall be in effect Immediately upon the execution of an amended agreement between the Governor's Office of the State of Texas and the North Central Texas Council of Governments. Section 4. That this resolution shall be In effect immediately upon its adoption. Ed Galilgan, Chairma Reglonat Transportation Council Councilmernber, City of Grand Prairie I hereby certify that this resolution was adopted by the Regional Transportation Council of the North Central Texas Council of Governments for the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan Area on April 91 1992. i Art artin, !lice Chairman Regional Transportation Council Deputy Mayor Pro Tom, City of Plano S5 a, ~ 5b~i ° k F' Q oo ~ oy p £ ~ ~ o bt SJ ° ro ro m A IN ~ a~ N ro~ ~ ~ ro v ro ro g~N R~ ^_1p IN Btf N N N a ry~ 35. ,V Q ~ R~ 91 ti g oar, 5a5 g 5 pros ( 6' p. Si R E tl E a b as NpM as E' ap u a a ro o5aa• ~aO a ~ c a s a g a~ aro ro o tltl ~ a S c a Q dog r Efl c c w % a ro a d rob. o c ffii o 0 0 0 0 p% ~ N z ~ ~ pg ~pd f n ~ A a g N 8 ~ °a a+ v po Y1 f9 ~ a a a a s a a a a a 3 g ~ ~ ~ p ~ g° Z a ~ ~ ~ C7 O z z x x x x z z t4 x z z a z x O O O O O O O O O O O O a 9' O O h z x z z z z z z x z z x ~•p ~j z x F` M M M M M M M M M MI M M M M O Z w OCF