Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-07-1992 A~nnda No, Agornd,r Ilom Nfu . Jv-..1. . AGENDA ~GLg G ~~J CITY OF DENT.ON CITY COUNCIL OO July 7, 1992 Work Session of the City of Denton City council on Tuesday, July 7, 1992 at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: NOTE: Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may also be considered as part of the Agenda for the Regular Session. 5:15 p.m. 1. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Consider action in Paul Iwucillakwu v. City of Denton. 2. Consider settlement offer in R. C. Shall & Associates Inc v City of Denton. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Consider appointments to all City of Denton Boards and Commissions. 2. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding revising Ordinance 90-150 providing rules of procedure for the City Council of Denton, Texas; amending presentations by citizens and time limits of biisiness for city council meetings. 3. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding further action on the possibility of an agreement with the Denton independent school District relative to the telecasting of Council and School Board meetings. 4. Receive a report and hold a discussion on the development plan for North Lakes Park. 5. Discussion of major budget issues. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, July 71 1992 at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of city Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the fol]i.)wing items will be considered: hjv 0a No. City of Denton City Council Agenda July 7, 1992 Page 2 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Consider approval of the minutes of the regular sessions of June 2, 1992 and June 23, 1992 and the Planning Seminar of June 5-6, 1992. 3. Public Hearings A. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance rezoning a 10.18 acre tract of land from Planned Development No. 41 district to the General Retail (Conditioned) district on property located at the southwest corner of E. McKinney and. Loop 288. (The Planning and Zoning commission unanimously recommended approval 4-0 at its meeting of June 24, 1992.) B. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance amending Specific. Use Permit No. 192 allowing for a new expiration date of May 7, 1998 for a horse training facility on a 173 acre tract of land located on the east side of Teasley lane, known as 3503 Teasley Lane. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 4-0 at its meeting of May 27, 1992.) C. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance approving a detailed plan for a portion of Planned Development No. 6 being a 12.2077 acre tract of land located east of 1-35, northwest of San Jacinto Boulevard, and east of Piney Creek Boulevard. The property is better known as San Jacinto Plaza. (The Planning and Zoning Commission rP.zommended appro-al 4-0 at its meeting of May 27, 1992.) 3A. Consider approval of a resolution accepting a grant offer from the Federal Aviation Administration in the amount of $810,000 for the construction of drainage improvements at the Denton Municipal Airport. 4. Consent Agenda Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the city Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. City of Denton City Council Agenda July 7, 1992 Page 3 Listed below are bids and purchases orders to be approved for payment under the ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back- up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 5.A, 5.B, 5.C). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss or withdraw an item prior to approval of the consent Agenda. A. Bids and Purchase orders: 1. Bid #1367 - PC Component Parts 2. Bid #1377 - Asphalt, Emulsion & Road Materials 3. Bid #1378 - Precast Manholes 4. Bid #1379 - Cable 4/0 Concentric & 500 Compact Copper 5. Bid #1380 - Cement, Lime and Aggregate 6. Bid #1369 - Roof Repair - Electric Pvr.dv.ctian 7. Bid #1372 - Contract Concrete Work 8. Bid #1381 - Taxiway & Apron Improvements 9. Bid #1392 - Tennis Courts Slab/overlay 10. PC #25224 - Michigan Instruments, Inc. 11. PC 025368 - General Electric B. Plats and Replats 1. Consider the preliminary plat of Loop 288 Centre, Lots it 21 3 and 41 Block 1 and a comprehensive pedestrian access plan on a 8.64 acre tract of land located at the southwest corner to E. McKinney and Loop 288. (The Planning and zoning commission unanimously recommended approval 4-0 at the meeting of July 240 1992. 5. ordinances A. consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and awarding a e( itract for purchase ol materials, equipment, supplies oi me rvices. (4.A.1. - bid #1367, 4.A.2. - Bid #1377, 4.A.3. - Bid #1378, 4.A.4. - Bid #1379, 4.A.5. - Bid #1380) B. consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for +'si award of contracts for public works or .improvements. (4.A.6. - Bid #1369, 4,A.7. - Bid #1372, 4.A.8. - Bid #1381, 4.A.9. - Bid #1392) C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for purchases of materials or equipment which are :.vailable from one source in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. (4.A.10. - PC #25224, 4.A.11. - PC #25368) nt~ondaD,o.. 9a -o~o~ A~enUa ;tntt~~~~" City of Denton City Council Agenda July 7, 1992 Page 4 D. Consider adoption of an ordinance vacating public utility easements on 2.258 acres of land lying in the Mary L. Austin Survey, Abstract Number 4, City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, and being a portion of easements from C. M. Simmons et ux to Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc, recorded in Volume 437, Page 613 and Volume 449, Page 439 of the Deed records of Denton County, Texas and assigned by Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. to the City of Denton in instruments recorded in Volume 2736, Page 825, real property records of Denton County, Texas, (The Planning and Zoning commission renommended approval.) E. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to award an insurance contract for Public Officials Liability Insurance. F. Consider adoption of an ordinance revising ordinance 90- 150 providing rules of procedure for the City Council of. Denton, Texas; amending presentations by citizens and time limits of business for city council meetings. 6. Resolutions A. Consider approval of a resolution adopting a policy in support of the Americans With Disabilities Act. y B. consider approval of a resolution adopting revision, to the personnel policy relating to tuition reimbursement, C. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the Right- of-Way Agent to accept the conveyance of a 0.4053 acre tract of land in the Morreau Forrest Survey A-417, Denton C.unt}r, Texas, from the Texas Municipal Power Agency. D. Consider approval of a resolution temporarily closing Pearl Street, between Carroll. Blvd. and Denton Street on Satti,rday July 18 for a block party. 7. Miscellan.ous matters from the City Manger. 8. official Action on Executive session Items: A. Legal Matteru B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments P~ertla Ptc. ~??.~D.~ ~ City of Dentin City Council Agenda July 7, 1992 Page 5 9. New Business This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 11. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. NOTE: THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT IS LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE. C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1992 at o'clock (a.m.) CITY SECRETARY NOTEI THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IS ACCESSIBLE TN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 4b HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY SECRETARYfS OFFICE AT 566-8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNIChTYONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX SO THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE. ACC0009A ~i ~r CITE!- . COUNCII t.-. ..ALL L 4 - 00 " oOQUU~IlU ~/O-- of a B o D t~t. o CI O o ~ t E 0~• °0a~ccacc as + $+.i - -M t-tL 4 Agenda Na. _ Agenda Item CITY COUNCIL REPORT T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: CITIZEN COMMENTS AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS DATE: July 7, 1992 RECOMMENDATION: provide for citizens to address Arove the ordinance revising City Council Rules and Procedures BACKGROUND: As per the City Council's direction, staff has revised the City concerns Council's on Rules and Procedures to notification. agenda items without one week prior their SUM14ARYi The following ordinance provides for a citizen to address the City Council for up to three minutes regarding any agenda item during a It also still provides for regular City Council meeting. notification by 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday prior to the Tuesday meeting in order for a citizen to address the Council for five minutes on any non-agenda item. This ordinance has also been revised per Council direction by allowing request to speak cards to be submitted until the item is considered. The provision requiring a unanimous vote by Council for citizens to speak who have not followed the procedure outlined has been deleted in sections 6.4 (t and (c), "must" has been replaced by the word "shall" in saction 6.4 (c). Also, please find attached a draft of the Request to Speak card for your review. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS. OR GROUPS AF~ FECTED1. Denton citizens and customers FISCAL IMPACT: None A;3ondz Flo. a -D D Ayer~da Ilr~m~.~~. Please advise if i can provide additional information. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, / Off!/ QGt Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: Catherine E. Tuck Administrative Assistant i f 1 A; endz No. A9enUa I;am wS ~a 4- _ REQUEST TO SPEAK ON AN AGENDA ITEMit~lb ___7'~ WELCOME to the Denton City Council meetingl The City Council is pleased have you at this meeting. If you wish to address the City Council on an agenda item, please follow the format outlined below. This will assist the Mayor in calling upon you in an orderly fashion so that everyone who wishes to speak has the opportunity. 1. Any person wishing to address the City Council on an agenda item is requested to please complete the form on the opposite aide of this card. 2. The Mayor will call your name to speak at the appropriate time on the agenda. Speakers are limtted to five minutes each on public hearing items and three minutes each on any other agenda items. 3. When addressing the Council, please step forward to the speaker's podium, state your name and address, and direct your comments to the Mayor and City council. 4. The Council requests that citizens attending public meetings observe conversations rules of thee Council coil Therefore$ nf please and refrain from private expressing your agreement or disagreement with a speaker by applause of other forms of demonstration. This will allow everyone to hear the discussion. Thank you for your assistance. PLEASE RETURN THIS CARD TO THE CITY SECRETARY AE VEST TO 9PEAlf ON AN AGENDA ITEM PLEASE PRINT NAME DATE ADDRESS PHONE CITY ZIP CODE AGENDA ITEM A. I wish to speak on this item. I will speak ins Support opposition B. I do not wish to speak on this item, but would like the following comments circulated to the City Councils Support opposition Time limit for public hearing speakers is five minutes and three minutes for all other agenda items. A;)@;IIfB 110. ALL00275\210.2a Agenda Ilern_~SQ°~ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION I OF ORDINANCE 90-150 PROVIDING RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE CITY COUNCIL OF DENTON, TEXASI AMENDING PRESENTATIONS BY CITIZENS AND TIME LIMITS OF BUSINESS FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS1 PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION-I.' Section I of Ordinance No. 90-150 adopting Rules of Procedure of the City Council of Denton, Texas, is hereby amended by the amendment of paragraph 6.4 entitled "Presentation by citizens" and paragraph 6.5 entitled "Time Limits" which shall hereafter be and read as followst 6.4 Presentation by Citile ale (a) Any person who wishes to place a subject on the council agenda at regular city council meetings shall advise the City Manager's office of that fact and the specified subject matter which he desires to place on the agenda no later than 5100 p.m. Wednesday prior to the council meeting at which he wishes the designated subject to be considered. (b) Any person who wishes to address the Council regard- ing an item that is on the Council's agenda for a regular or special meeting, shall complete a "request to speak" form asking to speak regarding the item and return it to the City secretary before the council considers the item. The Mayor will call upon the citizen to speak for no longer than three (3) minutes as that particular agenda item is considered by the City Council. The provisions of this paragraph do not apply to person appearing at a public hearing in response to an official agenda notice or publication. (c) Any person who wishes to address the Council at a public hearing shall complete a "request to speak" form and return it to the City Secretary before the applicable hearing. The Mayor will call upon the citizen to speak for no longer than five (5) minutes. 6.5 Tuna Limits Speakers before the Council are re- quested to limit their remarks to five (5) minutes or lees except for citizens speaking to a non-public hearing agenda item, for which presentations shall be limited to three (3) minutes or less. SECTION II. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the kenda No. -e 49 A7o0a Item validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declaring it would have enactod such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective imme- diately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR , ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY.SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY sit Page 2 CITY A ~ cOUNCII H ~L f OooOQQ oQr 0~6 R g0~00~ ~ v ~o~G0+ pt- ci x G r ..1 _ ~.a w July 7, 1992 lvlonda No, TO. Mayor and Members of the City Council A(lenduHem FRUM: Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: RECEIVE A REPORT AND HOLD A DISCUSSION REGARDING H1UMER ACTION O 0'4 THE POSSIBILITY OF AN AGRI'IIU:NT WI11I DISI1 RELATIVP. TO 771E 11;LECASTING OF COUNCIL AND SC'IIOOL BOARD MEETINGS REC(k+ ENDATION: The staff recommends that the Council instruct the staff to pursue some type of cooperative agreement with DISD and/or other parties. BACKGROUND/SIMARY: On June 24, 1992, Mayor Castleberry, Councilman Miller and members of the City staff met with several representatives from the Denton Independent School District (DISD) relative to the broadcasting of School Board meetings and the potential of sharing equipment purchased through the Sammons Grant funds received by the City. The DISD members were very interested in utilizing a portion of the funds or in approaching the broadcast of meetings and channel operation through some typo of cooperative agreement. Although the City has tentative plans to utilize all of the grant funds, there is substantial promise for the later option which would involve sharing of some equipment and a cooperative agreement for broadcasting School Board meetings as well as Council meetings. With the participation c4 DISD, it may be possible to contract out for the broadcast of the meetings with the City providing the equipment and another party providing the manpower and expertise necessary for the broadcast. Such an approach could relieve the staff from hands-on management of the project and increase the quality of the broadcast. PItO(jPMS, DEPAR'I~;N7'S Oi GROUPS AFFECTED: City of Denton, DISD, Citizens of Denton, FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. Respect illy submitted, y arro City Manager IA4/62992068/1 tl'wi.1 k.9nda No. Agenda 31em IVX 3 COOPERATIVE, AGREINENT Dale July 7, 1992 a V/ a Page 2 Prepared by: i g Director of Comm xty Services Approved by: e 6son Executive Director of Utilities Attachment i IA4/62992068/2 LUCITE' COUNCII Hill 11 1 I III r; ITI, M 1 1 11 11 kkk 1 J.r OoOQQo40dQ Gi~~o n~ c= ' Q~OOOO { ~ H O°OOO~~~ j~ ~~~4CCOGL~4~~~ y: i CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT lvgnnda P:o. kjrnda ARm lmlo _.=~r 7 TO: Mayor and Members of the city council FROM, Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: North Lakes Park Construction Plan RFCnTxtJENIIATION: The Park Board and staff recommend the approval of the plans to construct a softball complex, a restroom/concession building, a soccer complex, a picnic pavilion and new playground equipment, fishing pier, and a hard surface trail at North Lakes Park. SUMMARY: The Parks Division, with the approval of Council, will submit the construction plans for development of North Lakes Park per the 1986 Bond program and the approved grant from the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. ~ACKGROUNQ: In 1986, the citizens approved a bond program ti, improve athletic fields at Borth Lakes Park which would include a lighted four field softball complex and five soccer fields with one to be lighted. The department submitted a grant application in 1990 to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department to enhance these facilities and for additional park facilities. The grant was approved in November, 1991. PROD a4s DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: The new facilities will provide for expanded recreational opportunities for citizens and athletic associations. The Parks and Recreation divisions will be impacted by the new facilities and new program capacities. FISCAL IMP G,~' s Development funds to come from available 1986 bond funds for the $1.25 million projeca: including the $500,000 matching grant. Future operation and maintenance impact projected during the Fl 93-94 budget year. C7F RESPE ULJLY SUBMITTED: Lloy V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: l Name Robert K. T okner Title Superintendent of Parks Approved Name Bett an Title Executi Director for municipal services/Economic Development pr }r I{ Yi F s NdCndd rlD..~~ =Qr~~~ AI1ei d i IIP,III ciry of DENTON, rNXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 M E M O R A N D U M T0: Mayor and Members of City Council i FROM: Bob Tickner, Superintendent of Parks DATE: July 1, 1992 SUBJECT: Presentation of North Lakes Park Development Plans The Parks Division staff has been working with our park planning firm, J T Dunkin Associates and Teague Nail and Perkins Engineers, to complete the plans and specifications for the North Lakes Park athletic field and park improvements. These plans will be sent to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department in Austin for review in the grant process this month. The project schedule, plans, and specifications will be forwarded to the Parks and Wildlife Grants- in-Aid Section for review and to the Architectural Barriers Committee for compliance with the American Disabilities Act. This is expected to take up to four months. After approval, bids may be taken in October with a request for approval of the bids going to Council, in November. Construction is planned to begin in December with completed facilities being made available to the public as they are ready. Some will be available during the summer of 1993. The major athletic softball and soccer facilities are not expected to be available until spring of 1994 due to turf grass establishment requirements. I will be available at the Counc~' work session to present an overview of the project and answer any of your questions. O 'Robert K. T ck er AJJ00422 81715668200 DIPW METRO 434.2529 f' AOenda hJo. ~DaD PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETINGAUerda Etem_. 5:30 P.M., MONDAY, JUNE 15, 1992 SENIOR CENTER l Eti IlEE~~~ MEMBERS PRESENT: Tam Judd, Vice Chairman 1t~. Catherine Bell Burkley Harkless Neta Stallings STAFF PRESENT: Betty McKean, Executive Director for Municipal Services and Economic Development Bob Tickner, Superintendent of Parks Alicia Mentell, Superintendent of Leisure Services Janet Simpson, Park Planning Coordinator Joy Hesch, Administrative Secretary GUEbTS PRESENT: 10 Citizens from Neighborhood Adjoining the 200 Acre Park Site in South Denton 1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Tom Judd, Vice Chairman. After the meeting was called to order, Tom presented a plaque to Catherine Bell in appreciation of her dedicated and distinguished service to the citizens of Denton as a member of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board from July, 1986, to July, 1992. This was Catherinefs last meeting as a member of the Board. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM LAST MEETING On a motion by Burkley Harkless, second of Neta Stallings, the minutes of the meeting of May le, 1992, were approved as written. III. ACTION ITEMS A. Consider a conceptual master plan for the development of the 200 acre South Park. (Janet Simpson) Janet began the discussion by stating that the department had been working hard for the last two months on the master plan for the development of the park. She provided a summary of the process and said the item was on the agenda for this meeting because the deadline for submission of the grunt application to Texas Parks and wildlife was July 31, 1992. A recommendation was needed from the Park Board to be able to proceed with the application. Janet said that two neighborhood meetings had been held at the Southmont Baptist Church to receive input from the neighbors for development of the site. The first meeting was held on June 4 with approximately 60 in Ppenda No.a Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting Agpi)Oltom ' June 15, 1992 Ible Page - 2 attendance. There was a strong indication that residents of the neighborhood would prefer passive activities such as open areas, picnic facilities, playgrounds, and trails. Oth(sr activities such as athletic fields and the infrastructure were also discussed. At the second meeting on June 11, 30 were in attendance. charts were provided for information which categorized activities suggested at the first meeting as passive/active, gave estimates for construction cost, level of maintenance, grant ranking criteria by Texas Parks and Wildlife, annual operation and maintenance costs, and citizen priority. The suggestions were further charted as unstructured activities, structured activities, water related activities, support facilities, landscaping/ site enhancements, and indoor facilities. Also listed on the charts were citizen concerns regarding traffic, drainage, and lighting issues, and a ban of alcohol usage in the parks. Again, support was indicated for picnic and playground activities. Janet referred to a draft budget which was similar to the one used in the application for Local Park fund monies for the further development of North Lakes Park. Betty said the costs are based on the ability to plat the property in a certain way. she said the grant application for North Lakes Park failed on the first go round. Some modifications were made and the application was resubmitted. The department is trying to do the best job possible on the application for the South Park for a better chance that it will be approved on the first round. Janet said that she, Bob, and Betty had worked with Dalt.)n Gregory, chairman of the Park Board, on Friday, June 12, on the figures to also improve the chances of securing the grant on the first try. Tom said the proposed master plan seemed to be balancing what the citizens want with what the state ranks high. Janet referred to the conceptual drawing of the master plan which was developed using suggestions made at the neighborhood meeting on June 11. The concept located the entrance to the park opposite Santa Monica off Hobson Lane. The main difference from the original concept was the recreation center and the tennis courts. The concept included dirt pathways through wooded areas, playground areas, sand volleyball, picnic areas, restrooms, outdoor program area, open play, unlighted athletic fields, wildflowers, bandshell/ amphitheatre area, five parking areas, and retention ponds. } Adonda Ne. ~v_? _2~ . Agenda 11em Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting U314 le 7 _ Z June 15, 1992 Page - 3 Janet said the Engineering Department had indicated that that s time, would ocutslcould possibly Zbe improvements years ' and at to included in the improvements. Janet indicated the plans for retention ponds had been included because that type of plan ranks very high with the state when they are considering the grant applications. Janet said the department would like to develop neighborhood parks on the Hobson Lane side of the acreage as well as the Jason Drive side with Park Board approval. She said that at the meetings the citizens had indicated they wanted as many trails as possible. The initial plans were to develop a mile of trail from Hobson Lane to Teasley Lane and to Londonderry. toe be question Betty told the Board devel ped.f policy of ttrailwould There regarding the type seemed to be a controversy as to whether the trail should be a soft trail or one of concrete. If the trail is soft, possibly a mountain bike could be used, but during wet times, people would not be able to use the trail. If concrete is used in the construction, the trail would be usable would prime issue since an eight foot trail would pen up the whole park. The conceptual drawings indicated the development of an 10 acre park on the south side of the site and a seven acre park on the north side. The areas could be fenced, or the fence could be removed which would open up the whole park. Bob said the department was aware of the major concerns regarding maintenance when building new facilities. The maintenance had been classified into classes and a budget would be prepared on the basis of the classifications. The classes were as follows: C ss A Maine nce Mowing - Once every five working days Litter Control - Once per day, 6 to 7 days per week Restrooms - No less than once per day Floral Plantings Two seasonal rotations irrigation plantsband turf in lush condition `a c Mjn 1tla Nn..~~: Q_.e20_--- Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting Agerda Ilcm- &t s SL June 15, 1992 Ct,ta_7~_Z_ Page - 4 Class B Maintenance Mowing - Once every 10 working days Litter Control. - Serviced two times per week or as needed Restrooms - Serviced five times per week Floral Plantings -Only perennials or flowering trees/shrubs Irrigation - As needed to maintain minimum plant growth for activity class C Maintenance Mowing - Usually once per month or every 20 working days Litter Control - Very low level, once per year or if reported Restrooms - Normally not available Floral Plantings - None, areas may have wildflowers Irrigation - Not irrigated The class A maintenance would be used for the entrance areas. The area along the 1.2 mile trail or 35 acres would be maintained in the Class B type maintenance. The remaining 165,09 acres would be maintained as Class C. The estimated annual costs are: Class A - $ 4,400 Class B - 860175 Class C - 5,943 Total $96,518 Tom asked that if the trail is concrete why would the maintenance cost $86,175. Bob responded that most concrete trails have security lighting, along the sides of the trail would be mowed and edged, and policing would be required. The following are other options which may be considered: Keep the area fenced with no development, no use $ 2,400 Fence 183 acres, use 17 acres for park $450245 Fence 175 acres, use 25 acres, 2 parks 464,600 Betty commented that the City would like to do the development without additional maintenance costs, but the proposed development would create additional costs. The City will be facing budget cuts, and Parks and Recreation will not have additional funding for crews and equipment. Aomidj Agenda Itnm_~S ~ ~ parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting E)atu._2=-•'Z~- June 15, 1992 Page - 5 Neta asked if part of the undeveloped property wwould be ould be fenced. Bob replied that some type created to discourage use. The City would probably not lease the unused portions. Janet said the cattle lease that is in effect now would probably not be renewed since it is not a revenue producer. Janet summarized the master plan for the southern portion of the park as follows: Hard hiking/biking trail 1 1 mile mile soft surface. trail. " playground area picnic pavilion picni,; units (4) sand volleyball Tennis courts (2) Interior road The master plan for facilities cadcauniteto aJason Drive nd parking picnic 'would include a playground, inside the property. Citizen concerns and policy issues were: Lighting, pay for play at the tennis courts Lighting issues Construction materials for playground equipment Removal of fence roved What to do if grant not app Tom commented that the Board was dealing with the initial phase of development only. The later phases would include the items which had been left out. He wanted the citizens to realize g~ bly severs complete development will take a long time, po years. Catherine said that she had not been at the neighborhood the meetings but was concerned that, as had happened ter and development of the Martin Luther King, Park, the Board would vote on things only to be out due to budget constraints. She wondered if that would happen in this development. Burkley asked if the proposed master plan hinges on getting the matching grant from Texas Parks and Wildlife. Betty said the City will attempt to use the $500,000 of Bond funds to obtain matching funds from the state. The If l it b decided to aside proceed with then a mini t deapplication velopment. could 's I~cnda - Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting ~ger.6a itcrn ld1 s _ _ June 15, 1992 Page - 6 grant application and it is not approved by the state, the Board will be asked whether to delay construction so the grant application can be submitted a second time. Neta asked if it would be possible to use half of the funds for development now and use the other half for leverage in applying for a matching grant. Betty said the money cannot ;;e used before the grant is considered. Bob commented that if facilities are built prior to the grant they may not be considered. At this point, Tom asked the citizens who were present if they would like to make any comments and asked that they limit their comments to five minutes. An individual said he felt the park should be left in its natural state, that it would be ludicrous to mow the whole park, that it would create an ecological imbalance. He suggested that hundreds of trees ahou~d be planted. Janet responded that a mile had been set aside for soft trails and a mile would be paved to accommodate handicapped individuals, tricycles, and strollers. one of the Cityts requirements as a part of improvements to a thoroughfare is for a paved sidewalk along the street. The Engineering Department had indicated they would consider the paved trail as fulfilling the sidewalk requirement. Betty said the City is trying to do as much of the citizen's wants as well as meeting grant requirements. Bob atatted that once an act-vity is included and people begin to use it, then maintenance and liability concerns arise. A citizen asked if a paved trail was one of the prerequisites for the state grant and will that be presented to Council. She also asked where the soft trail and the paved trail would be located. Janet said the trail would be from Hobson to Teasley to Jason. An individual said that she had understood at the last neighborhood meeting that only one playground was to be developed off Hobson Lane, but now the city was proposing a second playground on the north side. That would be splitting the money into two developments. she suggested that with two playgrounds the maintenance costs would ba increased and the major playground development would. be jeopardized. She also stated a problem with providing a A)9nda f1 a. Age;ida l m ~sp'°E~L Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Dleeting I)alo 7~ 7- June 15, 1992 lJ/~ Page - 7 playground for use by the residents in the apartment buildings on the north side of the park since they were transients. Janet said the purpose of two playgrounds was to serve a large part of the citizenry in the area who may not have transportation to the playground on the south side of the park. At the last neighborhood meeting, some in tizens had voiced a concern regarding a playground area. Tom commented that at the neighborhood meetings concerns had arisen regarding the possible traffic congestion alon Hobson Lane due to having two playground areas emapark y help ttonalleviate somehof the concerns. A question was asked regarding when the final decision would be make about the two playgrounds. Bob said the final design would be done after the grant is received. staff was asked if the City always goes with the lowest bid. Bob said the lowest bid is accepted only if the bid conforms to speeificationo. A question was asked about tie timeframe for Phases II and III. Janet said that funding for further development would probably have to come from Capital Improvement Programs. A concern was expressed that plans for athletic fields had been deleted and wanted to know if the grant depended not in the on the t submitte. if the wila they be included facilities later? gran Bob said the City already has a grant for ballfields at North Lakes Park and felt the state would not rank highly another plan for athletic fields. At this point, Tom said the chair was open for a motion. Nets moved that the Board recommended that Council accept the proposed conceptual szconded the motion, and the motion master lan and development. Burkley y was passed with a unanimous vote. B. Consider a resolution development Parks and he 200 Wildlife grant application for acre South Park. (Janet Simpson) Janet said the Board, at its meeting on May 18, 1992, South Prkin Therant application for the staff development of with a li 2 as f r Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting ~11er,di Itanf_. _ June 15, 1992 Page - 8 (kilo /d Y// resolution is only a formality and has to be included in the grant application to indicate the support of the Park Board. Catherine moved that the Board adopt a resolution in support of the matching grant for development of the 200 acre South Park. Neta seconded the motion, and the motion was passed with a unanimous vote. C. consider a development plan for North Lakes Park. (Bob Tickner) Bob presented a drawing of the master plan for the development of North Lakes Pdrk. He said that since notification of the award of $500,000 in matching grant funds last November for athletic field development at North Lakes, an archaeological survey has been completed. The project design is now being finalized and will be submitted to Texas Parks and Wildlife later this month for review. If there are not a lot of revisions, construction could possibly start in November. IV. Discussion Items A. Discuss Civic Center pool renovation. (Janet Simpson and Bob Tickner) Janet said that in 1991 the Park Hoard recommended a CIP project for renovation of the Civic Center pool. Discussions were held with Council regarding building an indoor/outdoor pool. Subsequently, Council directed staff to look at what could be dole in repairing the current pool. An architect was hired wt.o presented three options, council wanted more specifics on what was planned, and at council's recent retreat, staff presented a report on proposals for a phased renovation. Phase 1A would be for critical mechanical repairs only and would cost approximately $294,600. Phase 1B would cover the construction of pool buildings, restoration of pool equipment furniture, replacing wood and chain link fencing, eliminating two on-street parking lots and adding a 50 space parking lot in Civic Center Park, and the addition of a toddler pool. This phase will cost approximately $314,400 for an overall total cost of the two phases of $609,000. Tom commented that he reoalled Norm saying the pool would not accommodate a six hour filtering system. Janet said that the new guttering system would be able to handle it. G rj i A,~ onda hJo, q.2 "D.Z/U Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting Agcndi 1tem.__ ` June 15, 1992 I)Ao _ Page - 9 Janet continued that Phase II would convert the existing pool into a zero depth pool, and Phase III palls for expansion of the pool facility with a new competitive pool in Civic Center Park. Janet said that at the Council retreat, council had identified funding and instructed staff to do an architectural study for Phase 1A. Staff will be sending out Requests for Proposals soon with construction on Phase 1A to be started immediately after the current pool season ends. V. Informational It ms Betty said that the recruiting process for the director's position had begun. The announcement would close in August, and it is hoped that a new director would be selected by sometime in the fall. Alicia provide the Board with clippings from the Dallas Morning News regarding the free food program which had been established by the department with funding from the federal government. She said that over 300 lunches are being served daily. The date for the July meeting was discussed. There was concern that the chairman, Dalton Gregory, may be unable to attend the July meeting. Tom Judd said he would be unable to attend the meeting if it was held on the regularly scheduled date of JulY 20. Janet said that passible agenda items would include After School Action site issues, alcohol usage in the parks, and possibly budget issues. The consensus of the Board was to schedule the next meeting for July 13. Tom said that as chairman of the Park Naming Committee he had received commitments from the following individuals to serve on the committee. They are Harold Perry, Jane Hopkins, Mayor Castleberry, Linda Haddy, Loyce Wilson, and Popo Gonzales. VI. other Issues Consisting of items and concerns brought by citizens, staff, and Board members on which no action will be taken. VII. AdioQrn on a motion by Neta Stallings, second of Burkl.ey Harkless, the meeting was adjourned. AJJ003F7 E ~E N rr-~ CITY COUNCII i i ooooa~oaaoo 0000 _ Q~~~ y E ~ ~iJOp .r p0 ~ o D o e lgnda No. Agnnda Item R^ CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTESale JUNE 20 1992~QG The Council convened into the Work Session at 5:15 p.m, in the Civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins, Council Members Brock, Chew, Perry, Smith and Miller. ABSENT: None 1. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters (considered action in Winterrowd, et al), real estate, and personnel/board appointments (considered appointments to all City of Denton Boards and Commissions) 2. The Council received a report and held a discussion with the Beautification Commission regarding current projects including: A. "Welcome to Denton" signs B. Name change for the commission Cecile Carson, Community Improvement Coordinator, stated that the Beautification Commission began discussing this item in January of 1992 after Mayor Castleberry had provided information that funding would be available for at least one sign to welcome individuals to Denton. Two locations were discussed for the first sign and University Drive and Dallas Drive were considered by the commission as priority locations. The commission felt that University Drive should be the first priority. The second median or third median on University Drive eastbound from I-35 and the area between the service road and the Rayzor property where the 1-35 service road connected to University Drive were considered. A concern was expressed by the Highway Department regarding liability if a motorist would run into the sign and the sign would have to be very small following the construction of the road. A recommendation from the Highway Department was to locate the new sign to the east of the I-35 service road at its connection to University Drive and adjacent to the Rayzor property. It could be located on state right-of-way. This would provide safety factors and would not have to be removed during construction. The design of the sign would be similar to a sign recently constructed at TWU. John Cooper, Beautification Chair, stated that the commission members had met with staff regarding the construction of the sign. The sign would be brick with the wording imprinted in the concrete. Bronze lettering could be used instead of imprinting the lettering which would allow for easier reading of the sign. The sign could be modified to fit each location. The Commission voted to approve the University location and the basic design. Harrell indicated that it was hoped that there would be enough money for two signs - one on Dallas Drive and one on University. I1 AUcritla IOm s. t City of Denton City Council Minutes June 2, 1992 Page 2 9 Carson at th was looking having somecoreallhOf the mater als donated ist chtas the brick of Acme Brick Co, he ck from Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins wanted to know why the University Drive location would be the priority location as more people entered the City on Dallas Drive than on University. She did not feel the University location was a good location for the sign as the road was going to be widened and with the traffic patterns as they were, a motorist would not be looking for a "Welcome to Denton" . There was no way to tell how the road configuration would be osincgne construction was completed. Perhaps the sign could be moved further down the road so that once a motorist was through the intersection area, the sign could be better seen. Carson indicated the landscaping project on Dallas Drive was more or less guaranteed versus the University project which had been delayed. The first two medians of Dallas Drive had been completed and staff had received word from the Department of Transportation that the Governorts Award for Beautification would continue the landscaping on Dallas Drive, it was felt that since the landscaping had been started, it might be better to place the sign on University as it would not disturb the landscaping. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins felt that if the placement were poor and the sight line were poor, the sign would be a waste of money. Cooper felt that there probably would not be any better placement than the one suggested due to the construction and the liability factor. Council Member Perry questioned if it were premature to place a sign on a highway which was going to be under construction in the near future. He felt it would be better to find a location which was ready for the placement of the sign. Council Member Chew indicated that he a problem with the funding of the sign. He did not realize that the city would no longer be a member of the Sister Cities Program. Mayor Castleberry indicated that the City had beeii paying dues to the Sister City program and had not participated in the program. He also indicated that some of the money would come from the U.S. Conference of Mayor's organization which the city did not participated in any longer. Council Member Brock felt that the Dallas Drive location might be too far inside the City and perhaps a sign further out should be Nurlda Na. __902 -D~o Mannda Item. .S o~ City of Denton City Council Minutes ~1Lq June 2, 1992 Page 3 considered. Council Member Miller felt that the impact of the signs would be felt when there were a number of signs placed throughout the City. Consensus of the Council was to study the sight lines of the proposed locations and the cost of alternate lettering with bronze letters and bring the results back to Council. Cooper indicated the commission would like to change their name to the Keep Denton Beautiful Board which was more iii keeping with the duties of the Commission. Consensus of the Council was to proceed with the name change. 3. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding a proposed ordinance which provided alternatives to the method 'of notifying property owners about grass and weed violations and reviewed letters provided to citizens for notification, Cecile Carson, Community Improvement Coordinator, indicated that certain state statutes affected the Community Improvement Office. The proposed ordinance would provide alternatives to the mailing of notices. Those alternatives were to post the notice on a stake on the property or posting the notice on a door of a property. The ordinance would also include a provision for repeat offenders. The wording stated that during a growing season a property owner would he responsible for mowing their property during that season. There was a list of 100 property owners who were repeat offenders who continually received notices from the city regarding weed and grass violations. The proposed amendment would allow the staff to mow properties that routinely were in violation of city codes. Some owners would not mow their property until the City sent out a notice which was a costly procedure. A notice would be received when the property was in violation which stated what the standards were and that the property owner must maintain the property for the remainder of the year. Notices would be sent out at the beginning of each growing season. Jesus Nava, Assistant to the City Manager, indicted that staff knew who the repeat violators were and that the procedure would not be used on a routine basis but rather for those individuals who continually violated the regulations. Mayor Pro Hopkins was concerned for those individuals who might be gone from the City on vacation and who received a notification while they were gone, Those individuals might not receive their notification until after the City nad already mowed the property. . s n,3enda hlo. _ I~i4 '61'90 1b, Z 7_-zgr _ City of Denton City Council minutes June 2, 1992 page 4 She felt that another notification should be given to violators. Nava stated that under the current ordinance a letter, would be sent after the violation had been received. The property owner was given 10 days to mow the property. If it had not been mowed after that 10 day period, a contract was issued to mow the property. a person was gone for three weeks, there might be the possibility that he would be missed and the contract given for mowing. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, indicated that the second notice should indicate that the City would take care of the mowing after that notice and that it should not be included in the first notification. Carson indicated the repeat offenders would receive two notifications. A letter would be sent at the beginning of the growing season indicating thelfprthe ovisions of therordinance a lationnd 10 day. standards of the ordinance. the second notice would t which notic e wouldcalso state again provision to mow the property. additional notices. onto the property and mow it that eCity ing might without send would not h discretion as to and d gave too Mayor reciHokins felt ve the notices that who would Staff indicated that they would look at the ordinance again to clarify the wording. Carson indicated that perhaps the section regarding repeat violators could be deleted and the other provisions of the considered. Eor Council feedback ordinance regarding the proposed notification letters. Consensus of the Council was to proceed with the new letters. 4. dThe council was to iscussion on the Fall 1991hCitizen CSprvey conducted and prepared by the University of North Texas, Marketing Department Profession Gopala Ganesh. Session under This item afrom considered the during City MangerRegular. Miscellaneous Matters The Council convenes' into the Regular Session at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. i5 i; d u ic- A,~ontla PJo. -Do~O City of Denton City Council Minutes June 2, 1992 Page 5 PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins; Council Members Brock, Chew, Perry, Smith and Miller. ABSENTS None 1. Pledge of Allegiance The Council and members of the audience recited the Pledge of Allegiance, 2. The Council considered approval of the minutes of the regular sessions of May 5, 1992 and May 19, 1992. Perry motioned, Hopkins seconded to approve the minutes as presented. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 3A. The Council received a report from Derrell Bulls regarding the Texas Special Olympics. Dr. Bulls stated he would like to present a report to Council regarding the activities of the Special Olympics and members of the City who were involved. He indicated that many people were involved in the initial bid process, one of the goals of the Special Olympics was to get people to work together. He felt that City employees involved in the Games were outstanding. He applauded the efforts of all of those involved. He presented the names of individuals who he felt should receive special recognitions Bob Castleberry (Finances), Margaret Smith (Volunteers), Alicia Mentel (Special Events), John McGrane (Administration), Brenda Burton (Overall Special Events), Darren A,1%.er (Evaluation), Max Blackburn (Registration), Gary Collins (Computers), Harlan Jefferson (Finances), Pam Livingston and Cathy Avery (opening Ceremonies), Teresa Milam (Closing ceremonies), Rhonda Gattis and Brian Bender (Awards), Kurt Lemley and Kelly Allensworth (Olympic Village), Steve Johnson (Victory Dance), Richard Brewster (Entertainment), and Nancy Gotcher (Clinics and Demonstrations). Many, many people were involved in this program which made It a hugh success, He was extremely proud of the City of Denton employees who participated and volunteered their time to the Games. He presented the Mayor a letter of appreciation. Mayor Castleberry thanked Dr. Bulls for his report and for his particiration as Director of Games. 3B. The Council received a citizen report from Mike Cochran regarding citizen input at City Council meetings. ~gonda .`7o. 4 A~endu item City of Denton City Council Minutes June 2, 1992 Page 6 Mr. Cochran stated that the current procedure to speak to Council regarding an item which was not a public hearing was to make a request to the City Secretary on the Wednesday prior to the Tuesday City Council meeting. The agendas for the regular City Council meeting were posted on the Friday before the meeting. In order to speak to an agenda item a person must make his request before the agenda was made public. For the majority of the citizens, those who might first hear of an issue in the newspaper, this system erected a barrier to participation in City affairs. It was a barrier to true democracy. He had conducted a random phone survey with the cities of Dallas, Arlington, Ft. Worth, Lewiuville, Garland, Carrollton, Grand Prairie, Irving Mesquite and Plano and all of those cities use a system which made it easier for citizens to participate in the decision making process, Each of the cities allowed a citizen to speak to an agenda item by filling out a card and presenting it to the Mayor prior to hearing of that particular item. He asked that the council consider such a system which would open up the rigid structure of the City's council meetings. such a system would allow a better mechanism for citizen participation in community affairs and could offer fresh ideas on issues of importance. Mayor Castleberry thanked Mr. Cochran for his report and indicated that Council would take it into consideration. 4. Public Hearings A. The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance providing for a change from Planned Development No. 6 to Single Family 10 (SF10) Zoning Designation for a 38.487 acre tract of land located on the east side of Dallas Drive, north of the exit of interstate Highway 35 and U.S. 77, also known as Township II, Phase 1. (The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval, 6-0) Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, indicated that this was a city initiated zoning case for administrative purposes in order for the existing development to correspond to the proper zoning. According to city ordinances as well as state law, rezoning, by amending the zoning map, were official only by passage of an ordinance approved by the city Council and signed by the Mayor and City Secretary. Technically, this tract of land was designated for commercial, multi-family, duplex, and single family uses. In order to ensure property owner protection, the City requested the removal of this subdivision from PD-6 to the Single Family -10 zoning district. A neighborhood meeting was conducted in order to answer questions and relay explanations to residents in the area why the city was initiating this rezoning. "i 1v~rntla tttl. 'z7 City of Denton City Council Minutes June 2, 1992 0 Page 7 The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. The following ordinance was considered: No. 92-090 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 6 (PD-6) TO SINGLE FAMILY- 10 (SF-10) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 38.487 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DALLAS DRIVE, NORTH OF THE EXIT OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35 AND U:S. HIGHWAY 77, ALSO KNOWN AS TOWNSHIP II, PHASE I; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Smith motioned, chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye'", Smith ""aye'O, Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye"". Motion carried unanimously. 5. Consent Agenda Perry motioned, Brock seconded to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith ""aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously, A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid #1359 - Transformers 2. Bid 01362 - Sewer Cleaner 3. Bid #1363 - Collection service 4. Bid #1364 - Water Treatment Chemicals 6, ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and awarding a contract for purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. (4.A.1. - Bid #1359, 4.A.2. - Bid #13620 4.A.3. - Bid #1363, 4.A.4. - Bid 01364) i Agenda No. Agenda llem_ DA0 7 " 7- City of Denton City Council Minutes June 2, 1992 Page 8 The following ordinance was considered: NO. 92-091 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Smith motioned, Hopkins seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving a lease agreement between the City of Denton and Cooke County College. Bruce Hennington, Superintendent of Facilities Management, stated" that the proposed ordinance would recommend leasing the upstairs of the facility to Cooke County College. The Master Space Plan, recently completed, indicated that there was adequate space available for City use and for rentals. The lease would be a ten year lease beginning with the fall semester. There was a cost participation needed to complete the upstairs. In the next two years it was anticipated that the following departments would occupy the building - the Law Enforcement/ Court Complex, Information Services, Personnel along with Cooke County College. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 92-092 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING A LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND COOKE COUNTY COLLEGE; AMENDING THE BUDGET TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS FOR BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motioned, Perry seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. C. The council considered adoption of an ordinance amending sections 2-80 and 2-81 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton by changing the name of the Beautification Advisory Commission to the Keep Denton Beautiful Board; changing all r 5 ~nnda Pao. _~Zs~.: -U•?D--. Ualo 7' 2 City of Denton City Council Minutes 9 7 9 June 2, 1992 Page 9 references to the Commission to the Board; amenci,.ng Section 2-81 of the Code of ordinances of the City of Denton changing the name of the Enforcement and Beautification Division to the Community Improvement Division; and providing for a repealing clause. (The Beautification commission recommended approval.) The following ordinance was considered: NO. 92-093 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 2-80 AND 2-81 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON CHANGING THE NAME OF THE BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMISSION TO THE KEEP DENTON BEAUTIFUL BOARD; CHANGING ALL REFERENCES TO THE COMMISSION TO THE BOARD; AMENDING SECTION 2-81 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON CHANGING THE NAME OF THE ENFORCEMENT AND BEAUTIFICATION DIVISION TO THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DIVISION; PROVIDING FOR A REPEALING CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Smith motioned, Perry seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance amending Section 20-72 of the Code of Ordinances to provide for alternate methods of giving notice of grass and weed violations; providing that the City may correct repeated weed and grass violations in one growing season by mowing without further notice; and providing for a penalty in the maximum amount of $2,000.00 for violations thereof. Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, stated that following the work session, several changes had been made to the ordinance as per council's wishes. The following ordinance was considered: AN ORDINANCE OF TH'r' iNTON, TEXAS, AYENDING SECTION 20-72 OF THE CODE aCES TO PROVIDE FOR ALTERNATE METHODS OF GIVING :r GRASS AND WEED VIOLATIONS; PROVIDING FOR A PENAL " ~(E MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; P,. ""71DING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DA'Z'E, AQ.r,,w1A N3. ,1 e~~ia llem ~ ~ City of Denton City Council Minutes June 2, 1992 Page 10 Hopkins motioned, Miller seconded to adopt the ordinance with the changes as indicated by the City Attorney. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. E. The council considered adoption of an ordinance prohibiting the parking of vehicles on the south side of Texas Street, from its intersection with Crawford Street to a point fifty feet (501) west of Ruddell Street; providing a severability clause; and providing a penalty not to exceed two hundred dollars. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, indicated that there were two ordinances available for Council consideration, one ordinance provided for the total elimination of parking on Texas Street and one ordinance limited the hours of parking on Texas Street, The original recommendation from the Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission was to eliminate the parking on the south side of the street. After further discussion, it was felt that an alternative proposal would be to restrict the parking during the working lours of employees at the service center. Council Member Miller asked if the Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission had approved the alternate ordinance. Svehla replied no but that the second ordinance addressed the concezn of the neighborhood over total elimination of parking. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 92-095 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF VEHICLES ELfWEEN THE HOURS OF 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 5:00 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TEXAS STREET, FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH CRAWFORD STREET TO A POINT FIFTY FEET (501) WEST OF RUDDELL STREET) PROVIDING A SEVERABIL2:'11 CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motioned, :perry seconded to adopt the ordinance limiting the hours of no parking between 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye" and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. F, The council considered adoption of an ordinance approving agreements for judgement for pending litigation between the City of Denton and David Solis. i AnenO No. Agenda 11en~ai r_ tk to _ 1-::--7 ZL- City of Denton City Council Minutes U June 2, 1992 Page 11 The following ordinance was considered: NO. 92-096 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING AGREEMENTS FOR JUDGEMENT FOR PENDING LITIGATION BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND DAVID SOLIS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. chew motioned, Smith seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. G. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance vacating a portion of a public utility easement, Lot 2, Block 8, Southridge Addition. (The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval.) Jim Harder, Director of Electric Utilities, stated that the City currently had a 16' easement. There was a single phase line in part of the easement and staff had r problem vacating an 81 section of the current 16' easement. T"are was adequate easement to ,he line with the 81 easement. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 92-097 AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT RECORDED IN VOLUME 31 PAGE 51 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTY , TEXAS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Brook seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. H. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance executing an agreement with the North Texas Umpire Association to provide umpire and scorekeeper services for the City0s softball leagues for 1992. Alicia Mentel, Superintendent of Leisure Services, stated that the ordinance would allow the City to enter into an agreement with the North Texas Umpire Association. The Association had provided the City quality service for over five years. The game rates were the same as the prior year. The expenditures involved would be offset WON tl ti• F, it n D~i onclaNo. Agertd.aItem /cis City of Denton City Council Minutes June 2, 1992 Page 12 by fees which were assessed to the teams. There was no significant change from the previous contract. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 92-098 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE NORTH TEXAS UMPIRE ASSOCIATION FOR OFFICIATING SOFTBALL GAMES FOR CITY LEAGUES) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Hopkins seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 7. Resolutions A. The council considered approval of a resolution temporarily closing the Interstate 35-E frontage road from its intersection with Avenue E to its intersection with Bonnie Brae on July 4, 1992. Catherine Tuck, Administrative Assistant, stated that this was a request from the Kiwanis for a street closure during its annual fireworks celebration. The Highway Department had no problem with the closing. The following resolution was considered: NO. R92-027 A RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY CLOSING INTERSTATE 35-E FRONTAGE ROAD, FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH AVENUE E TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH BONNIE BRAE ON JULY 4, 1992; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motioned, Miller seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 8. The Council considered an appointment to the Regional Transportation Council. The Mayor opened the floor to nominations. it u i~ t{ivdaNo. Agenda Et^m 2 S' 62 D: la L9_.. City of Denton City Council Minutes /3 June 2, 1992 (J Page 13 Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins nominated Council Member Miller. Council Member Chew nominated Council Member Perry. Hearing no further nominations, the Mayor closed the floor to nominations. On roll vote to appoint council Member Miller to the Regional Transportation Council, Brock '1nay", Miller "aye", Hopkins Olayell, Smith "aye'$, Chew "nay", Perry "nay", and mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried with a 4-3 vote. On roll vote to appoint Council Member Perry to the Regional Transportation Council, Brock "aye", Miller "nay", Hopkins "nay", Smith "nay", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "nay". Motion failed with a 3-4 vote. 9. The Council considered an appointment of a North Central Texas Council of Governments voting representative. The Mayor opened the floor to nominations. Council Member Chew nominated council Member Miller. Hearing no further nominations, the Mayor closed the floor to nominations. on roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 10. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, presented the following items: A. The City had received a letter from Parkland Memorial Hospital regarding the North Texas Poison Center. Parkland was asking for financial support in the amount of $6,000. The letter had been forwarded to the Fire Department for further information and to the Human Services committee for consideration. A report would follow at a later date regarding those department recommendations. B. An updated APPA agenda had been distributed to Council. C. A reminder to bring notebooks to the Planning session. 41 Ill oll Agendil 1)310 - City of Denton City Council Minutes /,g June 2, 1992 Page 14 Item #4 from the Work Session was considered. Jesus Nava, Assistant to the City Manager, stated that the Citizen Survey had baen completed and all the data complied for review. in general, City services received high ratings. Respondents were satisfied with most service levels and did not want them reduced to maintain the tax rate. He reviewed service areas and respondent satisfaction and dissatisfaction as was indicated in the agenda back-up materials, 11. There was no official action taken on Executive Session items discussed during the Work Session. 12. New Business The following items of New Business were suggested by Council Members for future agendas: A. Council Member Smith asked for a discussion on a plan/idea to clean up the major city routes as there seemed to be a lot of trash accumulating on city roadways, A. Council Member Smith suggested that the Council review Mr. Cochran?s suggestion regarding citizen input during council meetings. C. Council Member Brock suggested that the Council might review Mr. Cochran's idea during the upcoming Planning Session. D. Council Member Brock asked for an update/briefing on City recycling. E. Council Member Perry asked staff to look at the litter problem from University on the east side of Carroll up to the two churches. F. Council Member Miller suggested the Council review the charter relative to Council districts,, number of Council members, and single member versus at-large district. 13. There was no Executive session held during the Regular session. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. i C i' Aponda No, -0 Agpiido Ilam_~s ' ~ - - IWO City of Denton City Council Minutes June 2, 1992 Page 15 BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS JENNIFER WALTERS CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ACC00093 i it Rile CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 7 9 JUNE 23, 1992 The council convened into the Work Session at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins; Council Members Brock, Chew, Perry, Smith and Miller, ABSENT: None 1. The Council converted into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters (considered settlement offer in R. C.-Small & Assoc iaCea Inc V,, City of Denton Texas, considered settlement offer in Winterrowd vs. Casteel, et al, considered authorization for settlement of David Ambgrson and Linda -Amberson v Todd KidWe > and City of Denton, Texas), real estate, and personnel/board appointments (considered appointments to all City of Denton Boards and Commissions and discussed personnel matters r-nd duties of the City Manager, the City Attorney and the Municipal Judge as related to the operation of the Municipal Court.) 2. The council received a report and held a discussion on the Master Plan for the 200 acre South Park including the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board'a recommendation for initial development. Dalton Gregory, Chair-Parks and Recreation Board, stated that the Parks Board had recommended the Master Plan which was presented to council. The first phase involved several community meetings with residents which gave the residents the opportunity to indicate what facilities they would like in the park. Those items were then categorized with regard to cost and priority. Most of those suggested items had been included in the. Master Plan. One item substituted was the development of a lake and fishing area rather than undeveloped practice fields as the proposed lake would be considered more favorably in the grant application. The Parks Board recommended that staff proceed with a matching grunt application to Texas Parks and Wildlife for initial development of basic park facilities, Due to the fact that the grant application was due on July 31, 1992, there was an urgency to develop an acceptable conceptual master plan that balanced the criteria for a favorable grant application; the long range park development needs of the City, the reality of funding proper maintenance of the development, and the expressed desired of the adjacent neighborhood, Janet Simpson, Park Administrator, presented the details of the Master Plan. Residents had indicated the need for passive facilities. A community park, which was a more intensely developed park, and a neighborhood park were being planned. A future recreation center would be planned for an area near the community park. The proposal included a development adjacent to Hobson Lane li Agenda No, Agenda Ilern~._? . City of Denton City Council Minutes >ate June 23, 1992 Page 2 with a picnic pavilion, picnic tables, playground, 2 tennis courts, basketball courts, sand volleyball, lake with fishing pier, open space, soft and hard surface trails, restroom and parking, A neighborhood park type of development near Jason Drive and Londonderry would include basic picnic and playground facilities only. Walking trails would be provided throughout the park. A proposed entrance off of Teasley Lane would provide residents of Southridge adequate access. Neighborhood meetings provided information on what facilities the residents would like to see in the park. Passive development was suggested as a first priority which included trails for walking and jogging, playgrounds, picnic facilities, and landscaping. Active development was a second priority which included tennis courts, basketball courts, sand volleyball, and unlighted ball fields. Support facilities included adequate parking, restrooms, and security lights. Simpson presented the grant criteria which included trails, swimming, playground areas, hiking trails, Phase one would included a neighborhood park developed on the north side of the development. A concrete trail was proposed to link the two parks with soft surface trails in other parts of the develcpment. A lake would be developed to help with drainage and also be a positive factor in the grant application. Simpson presented the components of the grant application. She detailed the recreation facilities which would be included in the grams application which included concrete hike and bike trails, soft surface hiking, playground structures, 2 picnic pavilions and picnic units. Tennis courts, basketball courts volleyball and security lighting would also be included. Betty McKean, Executive Director for Economic Development and Municipal Services, stated that the original intent had been to open only 25 acres which was much less than the proposed plan. Citizens had indicated that if the park were opened to trails, they would be satisfied if the rest of the park were left natural. Most of the park would not be mowed. She detailed the maintenance requirements which would be throughout the park. Some areas would receive weekly maintenance in regards to mowing and liter control and other areas would only receive maintenance every two weeks or more. The decision to open the park and provide natural areas was predicated on being able to maintain these areas at Class D level (no mowing) and the continued support from the City Council if there were pressure from citizens to upgrade the maintenance at a later date. Four options were provided for Council consideration: (1) submit the grant proposal as recommended by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board on July 31, 1992. (2) submit an alternate grant proposal on July 31, 1992, (3) delay the grant submission until January 31, 1992, or (4) do not submit a grant and construct a partial development with the available $500,000 in 1986 bond funds. ~i Aq&nda Ilorn~~s _ Dalo City of Denton City Council Minutes June 23, 1992 Page 3 Mayor Pro Tem. Hopkins expressed appreciation to the Parks Board and staff for all of the work involved with the project. She felt the project should move ahead in order to proceed with the grant application. Council Member Perry suggested the lake be could be termed a wildlife refuge and could be included in the grant application. He suggested rerouting traffic off of Teasley as that street was extremely busy. Consensus of the Council was to proceed with Phase I and the grant application. 3. The Council was to receive a presentation and discussion of the Capital improvement Program. (Recommended by the Planning and zoning commission and the Public Utilities Board.) This item was considered during the Regular Meeting under Miscellaneous Matters from the city Manager. 4. The Council was to receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the City's new automated attendant phone service. This item was considered during the Regular Meeting under Miscellaneous Matters from the City Manager. The Council convened into the Regular Session at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins] Council Members Brock, Perry, Smith and Miller. ABSENT: Council Member Chew 1. Pledge of Allegiance The Council and members of the audience recited the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Resolutions of Appreciation A. The Council considered approval of a resolution of appreciation for Tillman Uland. The Mayor presented the resolution of appreciation to Tillman Uland. boonckNo Aorntla lz,lo City of Denton City Council Minute, y June 23, 1992 Page 4 The following resolution was considered: RA92-007 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION OF TILLMAN E. ULAND Perry motioned, Smith seconded to approve the resolution. on roll vote, Brock "aye , Miller ayes, Hopkins "aye", smith aye , Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "ayes". Motion carried unanimously. 3. Citizen Reports A. The council received a citizen report from Mike Reynolds, Grubbs and Ellis, regarding the City's cooperation in development projects. Mr. Reynolds stated that he had been before the Council on a number of occasions on zoning cases and as a developer. He had stated in the past that the city was anti-growth. Recently he had been involved in the sale of property in Denton and had received excellent cooperation from City staff especially the Planning Department and the Economic Development Department. He thanked the City for all of the help he had received. B. The Council received a citizen report from Joe Dodd regarding proposed amendments to the sexually oriented business ordinance. Mr. Dodd felt that during the year of hearings held on the sexually oriented business ordinance, three findings had been made: (1) explicit depictions of actual sexual activity was legal material in the City of Denton and in the United States, (2) the material should never be available to minors, and (3) the community would be better served if a limited amount of the material were available to the public through general interest stores as opposed to large super stores. He felt that one of the priorities should be that the material should not be available to minors. Perhaps an age limit should be included in the ordinance. A larger problem with the ordinance was the wording in terms of definitions. If the Motion Pictures Association rating had been used, a building inspector would be able to look at the outside of a box and count the number of tapes which would be excluded. The current wording was very confusing. The present definition might suit a lawyer but it was of no aid to a store owner or an inspector. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins stated that she had advocated that the movie ratings be used. She had asked the attorney previously if those rating could be used and questioned if any changes had been made knnda No. Al~r.ncla Ilmn. ~oZ T~_ o~lo -----2- 2_ City of Denton City Council Minutes D 7 9 June 23, 1992 Page 5 which would now allow use of those ratings. Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, replied that the use of the Motion Picture Board ratings standing had not changed. She would forward the Council the legal option which had previously been rendered in regards to using those ratings. She stated that she would review those ratings and would report back to Council. C. The council received a citizen report from Fred Connell regarding addition of a proposed drainage project to the capital improvement program. Mr. Connell stated that he was concerned with a drainage ditch at Good Samaritan Village. He was concerned with the danger of the ditch to the residents of the Health Center of Good Samaritan Village who walk in the area, to the older drivers in the area who had to negotiate the ditch through the area and to the children who played in the ditch. He asked the Council to inspect the area to see what the ditch looked like and the condition it was in. The Resident Council of Good samaritan had taken on the issue and asked that the ditch be taken care of instead of the occasional work which was done on the ditch. Mayor Castleberry asked staff to present a cost analysis and plan for possible inclusion in the CIP. 4. Public Hearings A. The Council held a public hearing and considered approval of the preliminary and final replats of portions of Lots 7 and 8; into Lot 11, Block 7, of the Alex Robertson Addition. The 5,040 square foot lot was located on the north side of Mill street between Cook and Allen Streets. (The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval 5-0 at its June 10 meeting.) Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that this was a one lot replat which was a replat of split lots. Before a building permit could be issued, the plat needed to be plotted. Since the lot existed in its current configuration prior to the adoption of the zoning ordinance, there was no violation of the area requirements. The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor. No one spoke in opposition. u, /gonda No. D;rlo City of Denton City Council Minutes 77 June 23, 1992 Page 6 The Mayor closed the public herring. Hopkins motioned, Perry seconded to approve the preliminary and final replats. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. B. The council held a public hearing on and considered approval of the preliminary and final replat of Lots 1, 2 and 3, block 1, Janke Addition, being a replat of the Dale Brown Addition, Lots 1-7, Block 1, on property located on the east side of Bonnie Brae, approximately 800 feat south of University Drive. (The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval 4-0 at their meeting of May 27, 1992.) Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that this was a residential replat of a prior subdivision planned development. The replat conformed to the minimum requirements for the subdivision and Land Development Regulations. The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor. No one spoke in opposition, The Mayor closed the public hearing. Perry motioned, smith seconded to approve the preliminary and final replats. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council held a public hearing on and considered adoption of an ordinance approving an amendment to Specific Use Permit No. 200 (Kern Personal Care Center), enlarging the area from 4.82 acres to 4.657 acres. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-0 at their meeting of May 13, 1992.) Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that this ordinance was to correct the meta and bounds description of the site. The site plan was not changed and this amendment would conform the permit with the proposed plat, The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor. !I +s li ii Ar,nda No, Agenda Itom_! s City of Denton City Council Minutes June 23, 1992 Page 7 No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. The following ordinance was considered: 92-099 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 92-012 TO CORRECT THE ACREAGE COVERED BY SPECIFIC PERMIT NO. 200; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Brock motioned, Hopkins seconded to adopt the ordinance. on roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", E-arry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 5. Consent Agenda Brock motioned, Smith seconded to approve the Consent Agenda as. presented. on roll vote, Brook "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid ;1365 - 300 KVA Padmounted Transformers 2. Bid ,1370 - Lease of Scraper 3. Bid 01366 - Wilson Street Sidewalk Improvements 4. Bid #1374 - Demolition and Clearing #19 5. Bid #1388 - Cooke County College Construction 6. P.O. 025029 - IBM 7. P.Q. #^5030 - IBM B. Plats and Replats 1. Considered approving a preliminary replat of Lot 1, Block 1, plus approximately .588 acre, of unplatted land into Lots 1R and•,2R, Block 1, of the Alvin & Charlotte Whaley Addition. (Tho Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval 5-0 at their meeting of June 10, 1992.) 6. ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting a competitive sealed proposal and awarding a contract for purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. (5.A.16 - Bid #13650 5.A.2. - Bid 01370) %i rj Agenda N0. A4~nntJa ltom .2S '~°ZT....~ City of Denton City Council Minutes June 23, 1992 U Page 8 The following ordinance was considered: No. 92-100 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE] AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Smith motioned, Hopkins seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. (5.A.3. - Bid #1366, 5.A.4. - Bid #13740 5.A.5. - Bid ,1388) The following ordinance was considered: No. 92-101 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS) PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Smith seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for purchases of materials or equipment which are available from one source in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. (5.A.6. - P.O. ,25059, 5.A.7. - P.O. #25030) The following ordinance was considered: No. 92-102 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR PURCHASES OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WHICH ARE AVAILABLE FROM ONLY ONE SOURCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ii I yi Nloiide No. nr,anda i~oR,~~s' ~a City of Denton City Council Minutes / S!c' June 23, 1992 71 Page 9 l~ Brock motioned, Smith seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll voter Brock "ayer', Miller "aye'r, Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye'r, Perry aye , and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with Corgan Associates Architects for professional consulting services in connection with the Martin Luther King, Jr. Recreation Center and anticipated future litigation. Bruce Hennington, Superintendent of Building operations, stated that the contract concerned the building at the Martin Luther King, Jr. Recreation Center. There continued to be problems with the building. The contract would determine what was wrong with the building and what could be done to correct the problems. The first phase would take water samples and ground samples to monitor water in the building and under the building to determine where the water was coming from. The second phase would have the civil engineers look at the plat drawings and determine what would be needed to the grounds outside to repair and fix the building. Phase three would be a report with exact recommendations as to how to fix the problems and the cost of those repairs. Council Member Miller indicated that the total amount of the contract was not listed in the body of the contract. Hennington stated that the contract referred to a letter by Corgan and Associates which indicated that the fee would be $12,900. If it were determined early that there was a water problem and exactly where it was coming from, the cost would not be as great. The following ordinance was considered: No. 92-103 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT HIRING CORGAN ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. RECREATION CENTER AND ANTICIPATED FUTURE LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Miller motioned, Perry seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion crried unanimously. Council Member chew returned to the meeting. I rl j NWifla No. ~v? Agorata Itom leS City of Denton City Council Minutes a~ T 9 June 23, 1992 Page 10 E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with the Texas State Department of Highways and Public Transportation for installation of traffic signal controllers on FM 2181 at its intersection with Interstate Highway 35E, Oak Meadow Drive, and Londonderry Lane in Denton; and authorizing the expenditure of funds therefore. Jerry Clark, City Engineer, stated that this was a contract amendment. The original contract would have paid the City for installing two temporary signals at Teasley Lane. Original payment would have included both of the temporary signals and the City would keep the controllers. The State revised the contract to include additional time for installation of the signals and would reduce the amount paid to the City to 20%. The following ordinance was considered: No. 92-104 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE TEXAS STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FOR INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLERS ON FM 2181 AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35E, OAK MEADOW DRIVE, AND LONDONDERRY LANE IN DENTON, AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance, on roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance providina for one-way traffic from south to north on Malone Street from tts intersection with Scripture Street to a point two hundred feet (2001) north of said intersection with Scripture Street; and providing for a penalty in the maximum amount of $200.00 for violations thereof. Jerry Clark, City Engineer, stated that the ordinance would establish one-way traffic from south to north on Malone Street from its intersection with Scripture to a point two hundred feat north of Scripture. This would make the section of Malone from Scripture to Jagoe one-way northbound and would eliminate the yield signs which would provide better safety for the general area. Smith asked about the head-in parking in the area, Individuals i r~ Agonda No. _~2=U0_.~ AwdoItom_ f?Sp,a City of Denton City Council Minutes 4/9 June 23, 1992 Page 11 wanting to park in those spaces would need to cross traffic. Clark indicated that that was an overflow parking area. The following ordinance was consideredt No. 92-105 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR ONE- WAY TRAFFIC FROM SOUTH TO NORTH ON MALONE STREET FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH SCRIPTURE STREET TO A POINT TWO HUNDRED FEET (200e) NORTH OF SAID INTERSECTION WITH SCRIPTURE STREET; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $200.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Hopkins seconded to adopt the ordinance. on roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. G. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance revising Ordinance 90-150 providing rules of procedure for the City Council of Denton, Texas) amending presentations by citizens and time limits of business for City Council meetings. Catherine Tuck, Administrative Assistant, stated that per Council's direction, staff had revised the city Councilfs rules and procedures to allow for citizens to voice their concerns on agenda items without one week prior notification. The proposed ordinance provided for a citizen to address the Council for up to three minutes regarding any agenda item during a regular Council meeting. Public hearings would still be five minutes. The ordinance would still provide for notification by 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday prior to the Tuesday meeting in order for a citizen to address the Council for five minutes on any non-agenda item. Council Member Chew questioned paragraph B of the ordinance which required "unanimous consent of the council for those not filling out a card." He felt that that was too restrictive. Council Member Smith agreed that that provision was not needed. She suggested a revision that the speaker card be given to the City Secretary during the meeting rather than before the meeting. she also felt that it might be too confusing to have same card for public hearing speaking and for agenda speaking. She suggested two differed cards to keep the items separate. Council Member Brock felt that the ordinance made the public { i A~e,idJ Iicm__.t~rs City of Denton City Council Minutes June 23, 1992 Page 12 hearing speaking more difficult. Mayor Pro Tern Hopkins agreed that those portions should be amended. She felt that with a public hearing, the individuals should only have to complete a card with their name and not so much information as some one speaking to an agenda item, Tuck indicated that the cards were implemented to make the records more accurate. One card was used as some speakers might not know if their item was a public hearing or an agenda item before the meeting. Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, stated that the passage of the ordinance would require additional information on the Consent Agenda so that an item could be considered from the audience. Council Member Chew asked again about the language regarding a speaker who had not completed a card. He suggested that that wording be removed. City Attorney Drayovitch stated that that language was taken from the council's current rules of procedures. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins suggested that the first part of paragraph B be changed to reflect the wording that the card could be presented before the item began. City Attorney Drayovitch suggested that the changes be made and the ordinance considered at the next meeting. Smith motioned, Chew seconded to postpone the ordinance until the next meeting for consideration to be placed on the work session as well as the regular session for consideration. on roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye".. Motion carried unanimously. H. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the city Manager to execute a contract between the City of Denton and C.H. Guernsey relating consulting services for the 1992 electric utility rate study. Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that the outside consulting firm would perform a study to assure that the utility rateLi met all state of the art rate making principles and that such principles were compatible with neighboring utility systems. Requests for proposals were sent out with five responses received. It was recommended that the firm of C. H. Guernsey be awarded the contract. D.alo ~r City of Denton City Council Minutes Tq June 23, 1992 Page 13 The following ordinance was considered: No. 92-106 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A C('NTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND C. H. GUERNSEY & COMPANY, RELATING TO CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN OF ELECTRIC RATES; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motioned, Perry seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "ayelt, Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 7. Pesolutions A. The Council considered approval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to submit an amendment to the 1990 Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds submitted to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Barbara Ross, Community Development Coordinator, presented information on the first two resolutions. The first resolution would reallocate $25,000 to be used in conjunction with an elderly housing program grant application. Council Member Smith asked if the Luilding would be sprinkled. Ross replied yes. City Manager Harrell indicated that overtures had been made to the Denton County Housing Development Corporation to provide funding to help with the project. Formal action had not been taken but informal discussions indicated that it would be forthcoming. The following resolution was considered: No. R92-028 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1990 FINAL STATEMEFT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS SUBMITTED JUNE 22, 1990 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT WITH APPROPRIATE CERTIFICATIONS, AS AUTHORIZED AND REQUIRED BY THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974, AS AMENDED; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (t 7 n fi City of Denton City Council Minutes June 23, 1992 Pays 14 Smith motioned, Chew seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered approval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute all necessary documents to provide that $25,000 in 1990 Community Development Block Grant funds be designated to be used in conjunction with a Section 202 Elderly Housing Program Grant application by the National Development Council. The following resolution was considered: No. R92-029 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL NECESSARY DOCUMEN'T'S TO PROVIDE THAT $25,000 IN 1990 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS DS DESIGNATED TO BE USED IN GRANT CONJUNCTION WITH A SECTION 202 ELDERLY APPLICATION BY THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUiiSCIL; AND PROVIDING FOR AN 3FFECTIVE DATE. Miller motioned, Smith seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Chew Brock "aY'+, Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye++ Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered approval of a resolution complying with the order for information by contained in the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2641. Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that the EPA had developed a program known as the Municipal Water Pollution Prevention Program to assure that municipal wastewater facilities provided sufficient resources for compliance maintenance prior to becoming non-compliant. Jim Coulter, Environmental Services Administrator, stated that this was a pilot program which divided the wastewater treatment program into 9 areas of evaluation. The audit process generated hy;.EPA The that were based on the facility's answer to the questions. required the submission of a resolution from the City Council concerning the acknowledgement of the information provided in the environmental audit and actions that the Council had taken to ensure permit compliance. Age~~cla ilein,!eS *a N10 City of Denton City Council Minutes Ae June 23, 1992 Page 15 Hopkins questioned the substitute resolution which indicated a change in the rate increase wording. Nelson indicated that the Public Utilities Board had requested the change in wording in order to accurately reflect the rate. The new wording stated that rates would be charged appropriately. The following resolution was considered; No. R92-030 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, COMPLYING WITH THE ORDER FOR INFORMATION BY REGION 6 OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Aq CONTAINED IN DOCKET NO. VI-91-26411 AND PROVIDING FOR AN EF:.ECTIVE DATE. Chew motioned, Smith seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "ayes, Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council considered approval of a resolution designating certain officials as being responsible for, acting for, and on behalf of the City of Denton in dealing with the Texas Parks & Wildlife Department, for the purpose of participating in certain grant programs for 200 acres of park land located at Teasley and Hobson. (The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommended approval.) The following resolution was considered: No. R92-031 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS DESIGNATING CERTAIN OFFICIALS AS BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR, ACTING FOR, AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF DENTON IN DEALING WITH THE TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PARTICIPATING IN CERTAIN GRANT PROGRAMS; CERTIFYING THAT THE CITY OF DENTON IS ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE ASSISTANCE UNDER SUCH PROGRAMS, AND DEDICATING THE PROPOSED SITE FOR OUTDOOR RECREATION USES. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins motioned, Chew seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "ay0, Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye}t, and Mayor Castleberry "aye", Motion carried unanimously. at Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. 'J Agonda No. ~~,4p?,Q,,,w,_ Agenda lltmi._leS Dalo City of Denton City Council Minutes June 23, 1992 Page 16 City Manager Harrell indicated that he did not have any items for consideration but would like to return to the work session items which were not considered earlier. 3. Presentation and discussion of the Capital Improvement Program. (Recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission dnd the Public Utilities Board.) John McGrane, Executive Director for Finance, stated that this was a five year plan with five annual plans. One section was the utility section and one section was a general government section. Items were reviewed by staff, the executive staff, a number of public hearings were held and then the Planning and Zoning Commission considered the items. McGrane stated the*. Council Member Miller had asked about the assumptions which went into the CIP. He listed the assumptions which included the CIP would be financed by long term debt, level of debt service, 1/3-2/3 tax rate golit, slight or no value growth, voter approval of non-approved 1•A:ojects. M,.yor Pro Tem Hopkins stated that the last bond package had promised no tax increases. Were these recommendations also based on no tax increase or would bonds have to be sold. McGrane replied that to the question if there would be any anticipated tax increase with the program as presented, the amount of debt would tried to be held at the same level which would keep the tax level the same. The 1986 issue was based on a five year plan that anticipated a growth in the ad valorem tax base and anticipated a certain interest rate. It also anticipated arbitrage earnings because at that point in time, the federal government had not passed the 1986 tax law which no longer allowed the City to use those interest funds. city Manager Harrell indicated that when the Council felt it was the appropriate time to approach the voters with a new five year capital improvement program, it would be a major policy issue which the Council would have to debate. Council Member Brook stated that before the public hearings at the Planning and Zoning commission, there were additional opportunities for citizen input. McGrane indicated that letters were sent out in the first round asking for input on proposed projects. ~I 11 I ncteadaHem ~S~. Dite City of Denton City Council Minutes Ja~ O~ June 23, 1992 Page 17 McGrane continued with the criteria for placement of CIP projects. The first round included staff priority; the second round included executive committee rankings based on the ranking factors of public safety, health, life (25*), legal requirements, liability (22.5$), quality of current service (20%) and economic growth and development (17.51). The third round included staff recommendations and public hearing input at the Planning and zoning commission and the fourth round was recommendations to the City Council. Kathy DuBose, Treasurer, presented the general government projects. The proposed projects for 1992-93 included a Wilson-Morse-Alexander area drainage project, a 1000 foot runway extension-south for the Airport, park development in the south part of the city, park acquisition in the northeast part of the City and a law enforcement center/complex. City Manager Harrell indicated that when the Council looked at the 1992-93 proposed budget, it would be in two parts. one part would be the operating budget and the second part would be the first year of the CIP program. When the council approved the 1992-93 budget, it would be approving the operating budget and approving the first year of the CIP program. DuBose continued with the 1993-94 proposed projects which included Lillian Miller sidewalks, Willowwood bikeway/sidewalks, intersection control signals, turn lanes for arterials, pedestrian signals, University Drive 135 to Elm right-of-way purchase, Payne Drive paving and sidewalk, landscape Teasley Lane 135 to Miller, library computerized system, pool renovation and fire/police computer. City Manager Harrell indicated that the pool authorization had been prepared prior to the decisions by council at the Planning seminar. The decisions made by Council at the Planning session would be substituted for the current proposal. . DuBose stated that the 1994-95 ,projects included street reconstruction, library phase 1, park development in the northeast and a new roof on 5 general fund buildings. The proposed projects for 1995-96 were Fort Worth. Drive paving and drainage (Phase I), arterial turn lanes, sidewalks/bikeways, Avenue B paving, traffic signals, arterial turn lanes, street construction, Westway paving and drainage, Fort Worth Drive paving and drainage (Phase II), Collin street paving and drainage (Phase I), city park water facility study, landscape Loop 288 and Landscape Fort Worth Drive - 1. Proposed projects for 1996-97 included miscellaneous street construction/ reconstruction, intersection control signals, sidewalk City of Denton City Council Minutes June 23, 1992 Page 18 construction, turn lanes for arterials, Mingo Road shoulder, Cooper Creek Channel-Phase I, Avenue G, landscape Fort Worth Drive-Phase I, pool expansion and replacement of snorkel. Council Member Smith asked for the total package costs. DuBose replied the total was approximately $10 million. Bob Nelson, Executive Director for UtilitiAS, presented the utilities CIP. The utilities CIP projects were developed around the needs of the City. Major projects for electric utilities included an addition to the power production plant in about 1995- 96; gas pipeline for next year, and a central dispatch and building. Water itilities major projects included new water plant/transmission lines, booster station at Hartlee Field, distribution system improvements and an elevated storage tank. Wastewater major projects included major renovation of the plant and collection system upgrades. Community Services major projects included mobile equipment and drainage projects. Harrell indicated that there was a difference between utility bonds and general government bonds. Utility bonds were revenue bonds which were supported by the rates and were issued by the Council. General obligation bonds funded general government and required voter approval. Nelson indicated the types of bonds which would be needed end the amounts which were included in the handout he presented to Council. It was predicted that the rates would increase approximately 3% in 1994, a 4-5% increase in 1995 and a 6% increase in 1996 and 1997. Water increases would be approximately 6%. Wastewater increases were estimated at 10% for the current year and approximately 7$ in future years. 4. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding the city's new automated attendant phone service. Catherine Tuck, Administrative Assistant, stated that as part of the new phone system, a pre-recorded message system could be installed. The system would involve calling a bacio numbs- and receiving a num,tier of menus to choose from. A two phase approach would be used. The first phase set of numbers would include four numbers - library main informatiox number, personnel job line, municipal court system, and parks ?.nfnr,iation. The departments were working on the recordings and would be available for the July switchover. The second phase would begin a month later which would implement all of the other lines. Public information would be Apo~r~a Flo. _ D.,2o Agenda horn le 's City of Denton City Council Minutes June 23, 1992 Page 19 provided such as notices in the newspaper prior to the eimxpllaemeinntation of system ase would the citizen ynewsletter. inserts would The system would be monitored for information such as the number of calls, the time of the calls, which information was accessed more frequently. Council Member Perry asked if everyone could access the system, Tuck indicated that if an individual did not have a touch tone phone, the call would automatically be transferred to an attendant, 9. Official Action on Executive Session Itemst There was no official action taken on Executive session items discussed during the Work Session Executive session. 10. New Business The following item of New Business was suggested by a Council Member for a future agenda: A. Council Member Brock suggested a work session discussion on the sexually oriented business ordinance. B, Mayor Castleberry indicated that the contracts with Moore building working well. It was not time to make a dacision as to the names of the various buildings. He asked Council Member Smith and Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins work with city Manager and he on names for the buildings, 11. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters (considered settlement offer in a,-Small & Associates, Inc. v C Hof Denton Te offer in considered settlement .1LtterrOwd yg CAsteel. et al, considered authorization for settlement of son an dd Kidwe>> and City eP flow}n,i '.'axes), real estate, and personnel/board appointments (considered appointments to all City of Denton Boards and Commissions and discussed personnel matters and duties of the City Manager, the City Attorney and the Municipal Judge as related to the operation of the Municipal Court,) No official action was taken. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned. k e E1 I Ag la No, Ap ida Ilon7.__'e6 ve. _ W18-_ =2 City of Denton City Council Minutes `'1 June 23, 1992 Page 20 BOB CASTLE BERRY, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS JENNIFER WALTERS CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ACCO0098 i M~r~nt~a P1o, .-V- P Agen~aa Itum!e S ~ MINUTES OF THE 1992 CITY COUNCIL PLANNING SESSION HELD AT THE GARRETT CREEK RANCH EXECUTIVE CONFERENCE CENTER FRIDAY. JUNE 5. 1992 The meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. City Manager Lloyd Harrell welcomed the City Council to the planning session and introduced the staff and topics of 4he day. At 10115 a.m., City stafZ began its presentations to the city Council. Presentations were made in the following order: capital Improvements Program - John McGrane, Executive Director of Finance Short & Long Term Finances and Budget - John McGrane Park Development Update - Betty McKean, Executive Director of Municipal Services and Janet Simpson, Parks Planner. South Park Land Alternatives & Municipal Swimming Pool - Betty McKean & Janet Simpson, In regards to the finank.ing of south park land alternatives and the repair work to swimming pool, staff requested direction from the City Council. The Council discussion involved methods of financing the purchase of the south park land and the renovation of the municipal swimming Pool. Interest funds from the 1985 Bond Issue were proposed for use in conjunction with either of these projects. However, the council decided to dedicate the funds to street improvements, Councilmember Mark Chew moved that $300,000 in earned interest funds from the 1985 Bond Program be used to fund street improvements. Councilmember Jane Hopkins seconded the motion. Council voted 7-0 in favor of the motion. In regards to the acquisition of the south park property, Councilmember Hopkins moved to use $500,000 of the 1986 Bond funds to purchase of the south park land. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Chew, council voted 7-0 in favor of the motion. Finally, the Council directed staff to develop a Request for Proposals for architectural design work for Phase IA and IB of the Municipal Pool renovation project, but wait until the budget process to decide whethnr to fund IA or IB, or both. Councilmember Euline Brock moved to have staff develop the RFP. Councilmember Jack Miller seconded the motion. Council voted 5-2 in favor of the motion. tl ffito City Council Minutes 1992 Planning Session June 5-6, 1992 Page 2. After the motions and city council votes, the staff presentations continued: Space Master Plan - Betty McKean At approximately 1:15 p.m., the City Council broke for lunch. The planning session resumed at 2:00 p,m. Staff continued its presentations: Library Update - Joella Orr, Director of Library Employee Compensation & Benefits - Tom Klinck, Director of Personnel Police Update - Mike Jez, Police Chief Fire Update - John Cook, Fire Chief Comprehensive Strategic Planning - Frank Robbins, Executive Director of Planning and Community Development Engineering Update - Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering Utilities - Bob Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities, Lee Allison, Director of Water and Wastewater Services, Howard Martin, Director of Environmental Services, Jim Harder, Director of Electrical Services and Bill Angelo, Director of Community Services SATURDAY. JUNE 6, 1992 The City Council resumed its planning session at 8:30 a.m. The day was dedicated to reviewing prior year accomplishments and setting goals and objectives for the new year, Bob Saunders facilitated the discussion. The results from the session are attached. Bob Castleberry, Mayor Jesus Nava, Jr. Assistant to the City Manager 1 l Agenda No. _._1 "DoZb Agenda Itam_ 5 T7 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS RESULTS FROM THE 1992 CITY COUNCIL PLANNING SESSION JUNE 5-6, 1992 I' i s? tt rf Agenda No. Agenda llernz Rato ACCOMPLISHMENTS * Served people well - things worked * Settlement (trial) Waste Management suit over; successful switch over * Councilmember Perry learned a lot, relationships, etc. * Adjusted district boundaries * Purchased south park land * Good job including citizens In decision-making * Fine working relation ,hip with judicial/executive * Economic development success * Special Olympics * Learned to trust/value ~Aaff * Constituents have expectations from council members * Moore building leases * Director - minority class * Loop 288, cooperation between city-highway department 2 :3etl yi:f$ sfdl E'. ii p. off,.. Agnnd3 I~lfni n ~C D3 to Accomplishments (continued) y~o ~9 * Policing/fire community orientation * Implementation of Mercer Plan * Mark's work with American Legion, park * Prank Robbins' work with Chamber of Commerce * Square, streetscape project * Volume of Issues handled * "Destiny decision" Upper Trinity * Some good, long range planning * Added another fire station * Ambulance business in top shape * Appointed stormwater advisory committee * Student committee .i * Lots of street work * Work with athletic leagues * Work with public transit 3 Fgonda No. ~Ilerda Ilnm_~~_'*~ _ D)IO Accomplishments (continued) * Priorities for work needed on buildings, long range program * "Fix up" of old steam plant * Facilitated development on Hunt property Example of good working relationships: staff, Council, property owners * Citizen survey * Expansion of After School Action Site * Airport development, improvements * Dallas Drive median work * Beautification Committee * Tree City USA designation * Work on substandard housing * continued good cooperation with County, Schools * Working relationship of Council having some shared experiences to build respect for each other, listening, trust i 4 t, Aprida No. Apollo item D3io_ 7- 7-yz Accomplishments (continued) •f'a q Continue to work on sign ordinance * Budget process * Listening to public; sidewalks i t 5 t' tj €i ISSSt E% CONCERNS, PROJECTS yl3 ~ spy * Upper Trinity * TMPA Concerns * Budget * Sign Ordinance * General Ords. Rules & Regulations * Stormwater utility j * Impact Fees * Changing Public Participation Process for Council Meetings * Space - Moore Building * Charter Review * Task Force - New CIP - Bond Issue * 21 st Century "Shared Vision Process for Denton" * Chamber of Commerce & City Council Working Relationship 6 h Adnnda No. Agenda Etom ieS I)J In * Perception of City - "Difficult to Do Business With" Need for P.R, How to HELP "little Person" Deal with City staff * FM 2499 & Other Highway projects * New Park Superintendent * Upgrade of Streets * Renovation of Civic Center Pool * Total Quality Management - Internally Externally with citizens * Recycling * Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal * Intergovernmental Relationships - Local - State - National Implications of Bal. Budget * Substandard Buildings * Special Olympics - 25th Anniversary * Affirmative Action 7 f AgohdaNo.._ c _r1 - Agenda Ilom^~S _ * Perception of City - "Difficult to Do Business With!" 7 7 Need for P.R. How to HELP "little Person" Deal with City staff * FM 2499 & Other Highway projects * New Park Superintendent * Upgrade of Streets * Renuvatlon of Civic Center Pool * Total Quality Management - Internally Externally with citizens * Recycling * Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal * Intergovernmental Relationships - Local - State - National Implications of Bal, Budget E * Substandard Buildings * Special Olympics - 25th Anniversary * Affirmative Action 7 z Agenda No, Agenda inCRI~~] iG _ * Economic Development Cost Effectiveness * A.D.A. * Water Tower Sighting/Design * Airport Development * Develop Plan for Sidewalk Repair * Legislative Action for Authority for 1/2¢ Sales Tax Relief for Property Tax Lobbyist for Legislature? * Civil Service Reform * Trucking Regs, Etc. for Economic Development * Court of Record * Examination of User Fees Relief for Property Tax * State In-Lieu-of-tax Payments * Housing - Continue Effoils for Low Cost * Disposition of Central Fire Station 8 yjoGti i." 1 Sep.. Apenriz Na . ~Oo26 w. * Public Safety Issues * Fry Street Fair * Donation of Old Southern Hotel to Housing Authority * Entire Fairground Issue * Our Own Working Relationships i .9 Ar~onda Plo. __._2~= D,~D Agenda ltom_-& MAJOR ISSUES FOR 1992 Wa-7~_. ~y TMPA * Staff review of rate structures * Share with City Council * Evaluate Future I1, Rules and Re tions * Perception that City is difficult to do business In/with * Look at procedures are we both efficient, effective, and user friendly * Explore survey of businesses and development community on the topic * Objectivity is Important * Questions about level of regulatlon, control, philosophy * Planning and Zoning, etc. * 21st Century Process 10 's r AgUda No, Aparrtla llem_ A0 IH, _P~blic Relations Wfe * Open up Board/Commission appointments to "new participants" * Mayor's/Council corner in newspGpar (no freelancing) * Parks and Recreation insert (look for other ways like It) * Use Cable television * Public Information Officer IV. Strategic Planning Pr~~ he 21St C~nt_ urv) * Shared vision of the future * Staff will collect other experiences * Jack and Margaret work with staff to convene a steering committee V. Publ, is Participation at Coun~i meeting * Anyone may speak to agenda Item * Three minute llmit/speak at time item called 11 i 1 i~ 'a .,a -4 aD Nenda Na. AQenda Ilem,_v * Sign card before meeting "'`°q SGg VI. Affirmative Action * Council needs to send signals * Hire where city can * Be Inclusive in board appointments * Develop other non-civil service positions for minorities 1 * Training managers to be sensitive * In-house workplace diversity committee VII, Charter Review * Wait until Texas Waste Management Issues are resolved * If committee Is appointed, then process needs to comprehensive 12 µ i' ij ®C I TY.~ COUNCII 1 _ TTT emu` r----r'~--- 'y N F 11 L OQOQ~~Q4do o aoooo~ ~OQA~ { N r QQ~ O~ OOH. J 41 aoOQ~~~4QCCtluGO~~~~~o~ w~ 2( DATE: 07/07/92 Agenda No. CITY COUNCIL REPORT Agenda IIUm- c:.1 Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager Q SUBJECT: Z-92-0091 REZONING A 10,18 ACRE TRACT FROM PD-41 TO GENERAL RETAIL (CONDITIONED) BZCQMME'NDATION: The Planning and zoning (4-0). Commission recommend approval S _ RY: This is a request to rezone a 10,18 acre tract of land from the Planned Development district to the General Retail (conditioned) district on property located at the southwestern corner of E. McKinney and Loop 288, BACKGROUNDS See P&Z Report. rEgGEAMS, DEPARTMENTS R G OU S AFFECTED: All property owners of this tract, Planning and Development, Building inspections and Engineering Departments, drainage and transportation. FISCAL TMPAC"': N/A Respeo fully sub itteds Prepared by; Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Kaftan K. Feshari Urban Planner Ap4HR Frains AICP Exeeotor Planning and Dev elopment AXX0019E ~i } i? li sr Agandd No QaQ AUctida PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT Tot Mayor and Members of the City Council Case No,s Z-92-009 Meeting Dates July 7, 1992 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicants First State Bank P. 0, Box 100 Denton, TX 76202 (Michael Cordell V.P.) Current Owners First State Bank K-Seven corporation Jack Paul/Tom Fouts Requested Actions Rezone a 10.18 acre tract of land from the Planned Development District No. 41 to the General Retail district (Conditioned). Location and Sizes A 10.18 acre tract of land located at the southwest corner of E. McKinney Street and Loop 288. This request includes the Genetic Research Center. Surrounding Land Use and Zonings North - General Retail District South - PD-41 - Planned for SF Attached East - PD-41 - Planned for Multifamily West - Agricultural/SUP - Putt-Putt Golf Denton Development Plans Moderate Activity Center f SPRCIAL INFORMATION } Transportations Driveway variances have been granted for the entire 10.18 acre tract. An internal access system between all tracts was also approved as part of the variance. F CI j i•. si Nonda PJo, . ~a -ova {Z-92-009) Agenda iforn~S July 7, 1992 (?ato Y3/ SPECIAL INFORMATION - Continued Utilities: Electric: Electric service is available to the property from the electric circuit running along Loop 288. Underground electric service is recommended. Water: There is a 20 inch water line in the easement within the western portion of the property. Sewer: There is an 18 inch sanitary sewer line in the easement within the western portion of the property. Fires Fire flow is more than adequate. uvainages The Texas Department of Transportation will be responsible for drainage improvements for this tract. At the time these improvements are made, the detention pond located on the tract east of the Genetics Center may be eliminated. No building permits will be issued on this site until such drainage improvements are made. HISTORY On October 19, 1982, the City Council approved the rezoning of a 112.80 acre tract of land from the Agricultural district to the planned Development district and approved a comprehensive site plan for single-family attached and detached, multi-family, general retail, and open space usage. Page 2 kwida mo. ArIcnda It(,, rn (Z-92-009) NAO _ - July 7, 1992 HISTORY - Continued 6 1986, the City Council approved the detailed site plan on May , d at the southwest corner of for a 2.1 acre tract of land looatei ved site plan represented McKinney Street and Loop 8 hopping center with a gasoline service an 8,000 square foot s15' the Planning and Zoning commission s to station. OnNovember 20, ationoint approved a variance to the Subdivision and Land Use issues discussed and allow two (2) curb cuts on Loop lan, reflected j consequently approved with the 1986 sited p the west, curb cut access with the property immediately locations, and drainage. All of these issues were critical because of the impact they would have on adjacent properties. The approved adequate and shared access to based on providin other driveways properties in Planned Development 41. On June 13, 1989 the City Council approved a detailed site plan for a 1,951 acre tract of land located approximately 500 feet west of the Loop 288 and McKinney Street intersection. This is the location of the Genetics Medical Research Center. On March 25, 1992, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial of a detailed plan for a .83 acre tract of and locatedwat the southwest corner of East McKinney and Loop 288. Deial violations cut of the locat ons~,i drivew y Land Use widths, on and regulations because Regulations pertaining gorier clearance, as well as disuniting an existing detailed plan. the Planning and zoning Instead of the applicant appealing cit Council, the adjoining property Commission's decision to the licant in submitting a plan for the owners otiose to Join the app entire 10.18 acre tract. roved On May 4, 1992, an alternative access (c Commis) plash wing proved by the Citizen Traffic ctig, Support access to the adjoining tracts. on June 24, 1992, the Planning and Zoning commission conducted a public hearing on Z-92-009 and voted to recommended approval (4-0). Page 3 k; ~rjonde Plo. qo~ - l~.~d (2-92-009) Anendnlioin /eS'r3A July 7o 1992 [Wo ANALYSIS The property is located in a moderate activity center. According to the Denton Development Plan, these centers encourage mixed use development. This particular area was approved, via PD-41, for general retail type uses. Moderate activity centers are allocated 350 intensity trips. However, when this 20.18± acre tract was approved for general retail type uses, a disproportionate share allocation was made, as general retail type uses utilize 650 trips per acre. in keeping with the moderate intensity for this site, staff recommends there be a maximum floor to area ratio (FAR), maximum building height, as well as a specific list of permitted uses. By placing such conditions on this tract, the City can better monitthe development thus ensuring the area to remain a moderately intense area. A condition approved with ordinance 82-83, the original ordinance approving PD-41, states: 6. A living screen or a six (6) foot masonry wall must be erected between the 10.18 acre retail area at the southwest corner of Loop 288 and East McKinney Street and the single family attached area beginning at its southern boundary when the general retail area is developed. As the designated use to the south of this site is still planned for single family attached dwelling units, it is recommended that a similar condition remain with the 10.18 acre tract. (see recommendation.) Provided that specific conditions are approved for this site, the request complies with the policies of the Denton Development Plan for moderate activity centers. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and zoning commission recommends approval (4-0) of 2- 92-009 with the following conditions: 1. Maximum building height: 35 feet, Page 4 ;I ,y i~ NrI0a No, -Ze 'DIZG (Z-92-009) Aye"ndallam,_S,'~~ July 7, 1992 a' I)alo on RECOMMENDATION - Continued 2. Maximum FAR for entire site: .36 3. Curb cuts as approved by Citizen Traffic Safety Support Commission, as shown on preliminary plat of Loop 288 Centre, Attachment 8. 4. Along the southern property line(s) of this tract, the developer(s) must comply with one of the following: a) A 35 foot landscaped area with randomly spaced Bradford Pear, Live Oak (bath 2" caliper min.) and Redbud (1 2/2" caliper min.), average 10 ft. on center. Any protected trees in this 351 landscaped area must remain. No parking or any other structure is allowed in this area; or b) A 15 foot landscaped area with a six (6) foot masonry wall along the property boundary plus supplemental vegetation consisting of randomly spaced Bradford Pear, Live Oak (both 211 calipers min.) and Redbud (1 1/21+ caliper min.) average 10 ft, on center. Existing trees 911 in diameter and up shall remain unharmed. No parking cr any other structure is allowed. 5. All trees (10"+) located within 20 feet of the property line fronting Loop 288 shall remain, this is not in lieu of required landscaping, rather is supplemental to the requirements of the landscape and tree preservation ordinance. This condition does not apply to the 69,035 sq. ft. tract located at the corner of Loop 288 and McKinney. 6. A comprehensive pedestrian acoeos plan as shown on the proposed preliminary plat of Loop 288 Centre, Lots 1, 21 3. and 4, Block 2 must be complied with. 7. Allowed uses as shown on list of permitted uses (attached). ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition 2. Approve petition with additional conditions 3. Deny petition 4. Delay consideration Page 5 .aeisJA1. yy R'a 1 Aganda No. gxd (2-92-009) Agenda ltonn July 7, 1992 No ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map. 2. List of Permitted uses. 3. Ordinance 82-83. 4. Approved detail plan for Genetics Building. 5. Approved detailed plan for 2.1 acre tract at southwest corner of Loop 288 and McKinney, 6. Minutes of the Citizen Traffic Support Committee (CTSC). 7. Site plan reflecting curb cut locations as approved by CTSC, 8. Reduced copy of Preliminary Plat of Loop 288 Centre, Lots 1,203 and 4, Block 1. 9. Draft copy of Minutes from P&2 Meeting of June 24, 1992. AXX0016F i Page F E' 4 ~t ALL00296 nnFr:ua 11emRs, 312..__.. ORDINANCE NO, _ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 41 (PD-41) TO GENERAL RETAIL (GR) DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION WITH CONDITIONS FOR 10.1834 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF E. MCKIN- NEY STREET AND LOOP 288; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATi.. WHEREAS, First State Bank has applied for a change in zoning for 10.1834 acres of land from Planned Development No. 41 (PD-41) to General Retail (GR) district classification and use designation with conditions; and WHEREAS, on Jung 24, 1992 the Planning and zoning commission recommended approval of the requested change in zoning; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the change in zoning will be in compliance with the Denton Development Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION _I. That the zoning district classification and use designation of the 10.1834 acres of land described in Exhibit A, attached to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference, io changed from Planned Development No. 41 (PD-41) to General Retail (GR) district classification and use designation with conditions under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION II. That in accordance with Ordinance No. 91-078, the property shall be sutject to the following conditions: 1. The maximum building height will be thirty-five (35) feet. 2. The maximum Floor-to-Area Ratio for the entire site will be 0.36. to 1. 3. Curb cuter will be installed as approved by the Citi- zen Traffic Safety Support Commission as shown on the preliminary plat of Loop 288 Centre, Lot 11 20 3, and 4, Block 11 as shown in the Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein. 4. Along the southern property boundaries of this tract, the developer or developers must comply with one of the following: Onenda No. ~I7p2 -Dad _ Agenda a. Plant a thirty-five (35) foot landscaped area with randomly spaced Bradford Pear, Live oak (both 2-inch caliper minimum) and Rebbud 1 h inch caliper minimum) trees, having an average height of 10 feet on center. Devel- oper shall not remove any protected trees in this thirty-five (35) foot landscaped area. Developer shall maintain this area as a per- vious area and shall not allow parking or any other structures to be constructed in this area; or b. Plant a fifteen (15) foot landscaped area with a six (6) foot masonry wall along the property boundary plus supplemental vegetation consisting of randomly spaced Bradford Pear, Live Oak (both 2-inch caliper minimum) and Redbud (1k inch caliper minimum) trees, having an average height of 10 feet on center. Developer shall not remove any existing trees nine (9) inches or greater in diameter. Developer shall maintain this area as a pervious area and shall not allow parking or any other structure to be constructed in this area. 5. All trees ten (10) '_.nches or larger in diameter located within twenty (20) feet of the property line fronting Loop 288 shall remain, this is not in lieu of required landscaping, rather it is supplemental to the requirements of Chapter 31 of the code of Ordinances of the City of Denton which provide for landscaping and tree preservation. This condition does not apply to the 69,035 square foot tract located at the corner of Loop 288 and McKinney Street. 6. The provisirins of a comprehensive pedestrian access plan as shown on the preliminary plat of Loop 288 Centre, Lot 1, 20 30 and 41 Block 1, as shown in attached Exhibit B attached hereto and, incorporated herein must be met. 7. The alloweO uses for the property are shown on the list of permitted uses attached heroin as Exhibit C, which is incorporated herein, SECTION III. That the City's official zoning map is amended to show the change in zoning district classification. SECTION rV, That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $2,0004 Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense, Page 2 i r..h.:ak I i ,70 Fonda No...~.-.._ K, Agenda Unn ~ s p &gjj0(_V. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the - day of , 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS; CITY SECRETARY I BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY i CS---) i Page 3 a tF¢yfrj t u ` t Monda No.._99--d D Agenda Item A~s DAD List of Exhibits 1) Exhibit A: Description of Property - 2 pages 2) Exhibit B: Preliminary Plat - 1 page 3) Exhibit C: List of Permitted Uses - 1 page ,f ALL0029E t j'. Agenda Dla. ~ 9a ~ Q,,,~O Agenda th!u EXHIBIT A TRACT ONE Lut 1, Block 1, THE GENETIC CENTER, an Addition to the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, according to the Plat thereof record- ed in Cabinet H, Slide 92, Plat Records, Denton County, Texas. TRACT HO All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situ- ated in the M. Yoachum Survey, Abstract 1442, Denton County, Texas, being part of a certain (called) 10.1597 acre tract deed by Tom D. Jester, Jr., and Paul M. Haywood, Jr., to First State Bank of Denton on the 3rd day of May, 1989, recorded in Volume 2571, Page 471, Real Property Records, Denton County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the Southwest corner of said 10.1597, an iron pin in the fence; THENCE North 010 37 min. 32 sec. East along the West boundary line of said 10.1597 acre tract a distance of 254.80 feet to an, iron pin; THENCE South 880 22 min. 28 sec. East a distance of 201.00 feet to an iron pin; THENCE North 010 37 min. 32 sec. East a distance of 414.92 feet to an iron pin in the South right-of-way of East McKinney Street (F.M. Road 426); THENCE South 830 54 min. 21 sec. East along the South right- of-way of East McKinney Street and the North boundary line of said 10.1597 acre tract a distance of 219.61 feet to an iron pin; THENCE South 000 53 min. 32 sec. West along the Went boundary line of a 75 foot utility easement a distance of 650.03 feet to an iron pin in the South boundary line of said 10.1597 acre tract; THENCE North 880 43 min, 40 sec. West along the South boundary line of said 10.1597 acre tract a distance of 428.28 feet to the Point-of-Beginning and containing 4.5486 acres of land. TRACT TxR All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the M. Yoachum Survey, Abstract 1442, Denton County, Texas, being a part of a certain (called) 10.1597 acre tract deed by Tom D. Jester, Jr, and Paul Haywood to First State Bank of Denton on the 3rd day of May, 1989 recorded in Volume 2571 Page 471, Deed Records of said county, and being more fully described as follows: Y~t I! ~l Ayantla nom.~s BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of said 10.1597 acre tract, a wooden highway right-of-way post, said post being the recognized South line of East McKinney Street and the West line of Highway Loop 288, also being the Northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Loop 288 Center, as filed in Cabinet F, Page 165, Plat Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE South 01* 16 min. 56 sec. West with the West line of said Loop 288 passing at 364.51 feet the Southeast corner of said Lot 1, Block 1, 288 Center and continuing of said course a total distance of 564.51 feet to an iron pin for the southeast corner of said 10.1597 acre tract also being the Northeast corner of a (called) 16.1605 acre tract described in a deed from U.S. Independent Companies, Trustee to U.S. Independent Companies recorded in Volume 1249, Page 753, Deed Records, Denton County, Texas; THENCE North 880 43 min. 40 sec. West with the South line of said 10.1597 acre tract and the North line of said 16.1605 acre tract a distance of 258.83 feet to an iron pin on the West line of a 75 foot City of Denton Utility Easement as described in Volume € 10290 Page 281, Deed Records, Denton County, Texas; THENCE North 000 53 min. 32 sec. East with the West line of said easement a distance of 650.03 feet to an iron pin on the recognized South line of East McKinney Street; THENCE South 830 54 min. 21 sec. East with the recognized South line of East McKinney Street Passing at 37.66 feet the Northwest corner of said Lot 1, Block 1, 288 Center and continuing on said course in all a total distance of 64.69 feet to a wooden highway right-of-way post] THENCE South 660 47 min. 19 sec. East with the South line of East McKinney a distance of 214.30 feet to the point-of-beginning and containing 3.6838 acres of land. 7 F I~ ~ I I I I k I c ~ I.I, AN M, IAIIY, IV+CI n, III II IiI~K. O Df I INIA1N NWIH - _ I r McbHkf Y / I + S~fft I ! ' I.L7., "jl 111 iJll;~'~. ~'1lla, ' ICTI /'I N 1'1 INI 11 fi,tl I ,.Itl„ri II I, II ~ I11 i I _,I ,eYn. wr I I ~I~ i ~w`tn i. ~IIF.Ai t • I .,IiIN! • I , ohm Lot T / 1 m 11 I ,rrr I. I, r rx,twlC .vel I, pq P4 l I .L PREL&WARV PkAr ti f tt' I j Of DKl1KW0(R•IIyA ' r leT! I Loop 900 Con fro, (~I LW VAvtym No 9 I01N LOU C3, of Amid A UND SMKT00 N0 I i I =X n, Block On& ~~(W N Y .real AN AOOfl'MIN ro rimy Purr OF OEAIrOM C"rr of ".Wr4W ----------------_DIMNER/DCALDPER STArE of Wool$ IMI $IeR ex« or OWN a MO r ""t[s KA. - TOKK CW. ~yy~T y{yyy CONTAWNNQ S.1r ACRES OLKMx, Ix Y 10AMI 0 KOKNI M A,M MuS M go". u 0 " P. 0 ! 100 o PW5 ANT Kft 0. II11/ 11!!'1'DNYNX Mot 1U~1'IVIUA INI m.. L. MI. Iwn~.1 ray { rr s EXHIBIT C Awda No. Agenda Item ~S LIeT OF PERMITTED U8E8 [Alta .3/ Animal Clinic or Hospital ~ '•y' Antique Shop (no outside runs or pens) Art Gallery or Museum Auto Laundry A Bakery or Confectionery Shop (Retail) Church or Rectory g, Cleaning and Pressing Small Shop and Pickup College of University or Private School Community Center (Public or Private) Custom Personal Service Shop °rr Day Nursery or Kindergarten School 1 Drapery, Needlework or Weaving Shop Electrical Substation Electrical Transmission Line Fire Station or Similar Public Safety Building Florist or Garden Shop Gas Transmission Line and Metering Station Gasoline Service Station Greenhouse or Plant Nursery (Retail only) Handicraft shop Household Appliance Service and Repair Institutions of Religious or Philanthropic Nature Laundry or Cleaning Self service Mimeograph, Stationery or letter Shop New Auto Parts sales Stores Nursing Home or Residence Home for Aged Off Premise Sale of Beer and/or Wine Off Street Parking Incidental, to Main Use off street Remote Parking Offices, Professional and Administrative Park, Playground or Public Community Center Public Library Retial Stores and Shops School, Business or Trade School, Private School, Publio or Denominational' Studio for Photographer, Musician, Artist or Health Telephone, Business office Telephone Line and Exchange Switching or Rela y Eating Establishments y station Medical Research institution (in building only) i . ATTACI MENT 1 {~onda tlo. Agencla Itan_ ~e S Nto A~o pSl / NORTH r - - J U P~IsLEY sr, NAars~Er r-~ 0 we x! +r f1 1 ~ISITE J~ SHADY OAI(f / I ~ J1 ~r I ' 1 1 IA MA DATE; 2/20/02 SCALE; NONE r S t? Attachment 2 r4~ancfa No. npenaa f(amS-~`ZQ._ LIST 0! PERMTTTp_ 068 f)310 _2~2-12' Animal Clinic or Hospital (no outside runs or pens) Antique Shop Art Gallery or Museum Auto Laundry Bakery or Confectionery Shop (Retail) Church or Rectory Cleaning and Pressing Small Shop and Pickup College of University or Private School Community Center (Public or Private) custom Personal Service Shop Day Nursery or Kindergarten school Drapery, Needlework or weaving Shop Electrical Substation Electrical Transmission Line Fire station or similar Public Safety Building Florist or Garden Shop Gas Transmission Line and metering station Gasoline Service Station Greenhouse or Plant Nursery (Retail only) Handicraft Shop Household Appliance Service and Repair Institutions of Religious or Philanthropic Nature Laundry or Cleaning Self Service Mimeograph, Stationery or letter Shop New Auto Parts Sales Stores Nursing Home or Residence Home for Aged off premise sale of Beer and/or Wine off Street Parking incidental to Main Use off Street Remote Parking Offices, Professional and Administrative Park, Playground or Public Community Center Public Library Retiil Stores and Shops School, Business or Trade School, Private School, Public or Denominational studio for Photographer, Musician, Artist or Health Telephone, Business Office Telephone ikine and Exchange Switching or Relay Station Eating Establishments Medical Research Institution (in building only) j 0~ ~i l enda ~)o. ~P4 --0a20 ATTACHMENT 3 ARer:da lcem_.S '`~3fJ ila(o ~_2_7 f NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING NAP OF THE CITY OP Op DENTO TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE COOS F ARIAS SAIDpMAPEAPPCITY LIESpTOEAPPROXI,~lATELYB112.aa ACRES NO0F6L~ND OUT Of THE N.E.P., i P„R-R« SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.. 927, THE M. L. AUSTIN SURVEY,, ABSTRACT NO. 4 „ AND THE M. YOACHAN SUSCAIBED REYN42 AN PARTICULARLY DES 0 UECOLARIING AN A TEXASI ~EFFECTIVEDATE~ RVEY, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSI SECTION I. The Zoning Classification and following described propmrty, to- wits Use designation of the All that certain tract or P.R.Jt., survey„ Abs t Parcel of land situated in the i.ract No. 927, Denton CountYe, Texas, being part of the second Tract of a dead conveyed by J- R.. Earle, at ux to Delbert T. Cruze on April 18, 1941, recorded in volume 290, Page 1551 Deed Records of $aid County, and being more particularly described as follower BEGINNING at the southeast corner of the above described Second tract in the center of the channel of Pecan Creek, THENCE west with the center line 09 Paean Creek the following 5 courses 7god distancesr (1) north 84004.' west 171.73 feet, (2) 5a'2a west 247,69 feet, (3) north 8308'2a" west 384.79 feet, (4) south 84037' west 298,1 feat and (5) south 71017' west 311.7 feet to the east right of way of Loop 288 THENCE north 1015' east with said east right of way 370.3 feet to a right of way posh THENCE north 1037' west 200.2 feet to a right of way post THENCE north 1015' east with said east right of way 1530,0 feet to a right of way post! THENCE north 55034' east with said right of way 56.0 feet to a right of way post on the south line of East McKinney .strestj THENCF youth 65025' east with said McKinney right of way 80,9 feo;t to a right of way post THU01 south 61057' east with said McKinney right of way 304.0 feat to a right of way post TIMUCE south 62030' east with said right of way 56,0 feet to a fence eornerl THENCE south 21041'10" west 194449 feet to A fence corner? THENCE south 62046140" east with a fence 46795 fast to a fence corners THENCE north 24000010' sent with a fence 191.0 feet to a fence corner on the south right of way of McKinney street] THENCE south 61059' e,lot with said Moxinney street right of way 458.6 feet to a right of way post] 2-1540/}FRED H, DEAL-PAGE ONE err' _ _ 'i A47onrJaPlo...~=_Do•2~ AgenddJlmn~ THENCE southeasterly with said McKinney fence ,s right Of way and with a 3.6110 to the left 125,4 feet to a fence corners THENCE south 1045' west with a fence 1320.0 feet to the place of beginning, and containing in all 52.351 acres of land. All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the M. L.. Austin Survey,, Abstract No. 4, and the M. Yoaeham Survey, Abstract No. 1442, Denton County, Texas, and being part of a toeDelberttT_ Cruz& oo Aprile18,c1911, recorded R1nE Volumee290,~ Page 155, and pact of a tract conveyed by C,. E. Wallace, at ux to Deb Cruze on July 12, 19J4, recorded in Volume 306, Page 482, Deed Records of Danton County, , Texas, and being more particularly described as followai BEGINNING at a fence corner on the south right of way of East McKinney Road also being the northwest corner of the above described Wallace to Cruze tract, THENCE south 84020' east with said eight of way 486.0 feet to a corner, THENCE south 660311240 east 213.46 feet to a corner at the intersection of East McKinney and Loop 288.1 THENCE south 1015' went wits: the west right of way of Loop 288 a distance of 1573,0 fast to a eight of way post, THENCE south 9047' west with said right of way 200.2 feet to a right of way post, THENCE south 1015' west with said right of way 393.7 feet to a corner in the center of the Channel of Pecan Creek, THENCE westerly with the center of Pecan Creek the following courser and distaneess (1) south 84041' west 399,05 feet, (2) south 7404x' west 192.9 feet, (3) south 600561' west 391,2 fast, (4) north 45001' west 304.6., THHrENCE north 03057' west with a fence 510,0 feet to a lance cOnstj THENCE no►t.h 1058' east along and with a fence 992.0 feet to a fence corner on the south line of said Yoacham Surveys THM'01 north 89054' east with a fence 97561 feet to a fence corner; THENCE north 1035' east with a fence 1312.9 feet to the place of beginning and containingi 60.528 acres of land. is hereby changed from Agricultural "A" District Classification We to Planned Development "PO" District Classification and Use under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas subject to the following conditions and restrictions and site Plan attached hereto to-wit, l,. Land uses within the planned development are restricted to the uses specifically designated on the general concept plant specific site plan withinakhoudesignated landbusee&coaa loF,aent occurs Z-1540/nco H. 0, -"AGE TOAD ~dr L. t~ i} Ailunda Item eso:~'/ 0110 3 / 2. Specific development Proposals shall conform X20 . to City of Denton requirements regarding zoning use classifications, subdivision regulationa, building codes and any other codes related to development 3. Density in multi-family areas shall be limited to 22 units per acres 4. Density in single-family attached areas shall be limited to 10 units per acre S. Reaidential streets in accordance with City of Denton standards shall be provided for internal circulation, 6. A living screen or a six (6) foct masonry wale. must be erected between the 10.18 acre retail area a McKinney t the southwest corner of Loop 288 and East area begs ntingtata Itstsouthernleboundary when the general retail area is developedr 7. Adequate screening consisting of a living screen or a six (6) foot solid masonry wall shall be erected along any property line where general retail abuts low density single family residential housing when the general retail area is developed 8. Any land use permitted in the general retail (OR) classification of the zoning ordinance may be developed in the areas deaignated as general retail without amendment of the planned development (PD) ordinances 9. if the development plans are not realized within five (S) years so that actual development includes some' residential and is not ltmitd to general retail, the planned development will bb re-evaluated and considered a candidate far possible back-zoning to a smaller size center. The zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the Cityy or Denton, Texas, under Ordinance No, 69-1, be, and the sane it hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and Use, SUCTION II. That the city council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is In accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the g1ty of Denton, Texas, and•,with reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most ap,eopriata uses of land !or the maximua benefit to the City or 0enton, Texas, and its citizens. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect heeaarings having heretofore passage and approvalthe Planninq land public oning 1-1440/FRED R. DEAL-PAGE TARES Il l ior, N•,.:al f, ~tltli Agenda Item, 4 , Commission and the city council of the city of Denton, Texas, after giving due notice thereof, PASSED AND APPROVED this the 19 ~daV of October, 1982, IC RD 0, TEA , 77Y'O CIT OF 0 TON, TEXAS ATTESTi CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SEC RY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS eYr 2-1540/FP.ED H. DRAL-PA01 FOUR 4 ~i M - r.•r. IH,' 1..1. ire. ~ -!'j 1 M X47171.7 'aa 9001 low 49•B Y~ •C I)'r<klun r•mu lr ur t~ en 'p+Ye~o1 ' c`~ 1 Iall!l SII}ON171)Me) 111 )111`1 )IIIU)III OJIIY/ 'pY 1Y'1 A3lwve-1'Inw b r 0 'pi 9L'0! 'y t5 iONIl SIO 9NI 117M0 NO'd IaY LPL li . . t 1DIlIISIA pNIl UMA j! • AIIwYf`II In" a 03H9V1711A11wV u ri AA, C ! 37DHIS ~I ~~e 0 ~pp O.OI _ f; Q' ) 191111 SIO 'J111 It p~ 9! 1r r1r 17MU - lOrbtSlOpHf373Md ~ ~ . 47MYvl-II Inw IDI"BSIIIDN1733M0 I 03111V11V f, A7MVl 3l5NlS 1Y11µ1 r)•ws linglp.~ e 3` AIINYIqIIIIw ' 1►'I SIY1r p'tlr Idol tll y, '0916'` I .-li'i rrn.,p. I'-t lhllblr YGl )I lh', r al„ rYfr ' ~ e1 V r. )e hn1o 1~ - iYH • ''•111"1'91 1 N "1 tr rtr o rl.llr~ aln rnln Y 19IIIlS to 'pt 9)•y1 rer "Hurl r..rlx)Y•. u: ILI a' 71Y1311 3Sf10HY Itilq 1HYld 3115 S Iva 3H 39 1DIN i "'J, 'IIY134 Iva iN:}p i 4 h ti a sr tr 1 ru rl Y. .r .t-~ I i; S I111n0 3 X 13d0b 1 3vt s elr:r. i oVSt-z - Nb'Td 311S i L i j 1 I f r k 51 M1 f iS it g: r ral SITE PLAN - z-1540 _ • .r.l u, u.l , 41E I HOPLE R E QUI I It. S . II !Si n _ _ IgSf N f,FNEItAI HCIAIL M1~Yy~ ~ OISIRICI DL NL RAL ~y SIIE PLAN LAND USE OIL TAIL ~ lal l:wylps::;.y; 10.1•ea m 5If11Cl •a liu.~ u1 r 1\\ i P,.1/ury AI I.UY f. 11.{ .tM! m C rill II 1{. 1:1 {I .I {.{1 r4 'wlL!rnl ll.in mbi~oow,l (,!1 ii 4A1 ■o. 1.41 101.1 Ili u .(III! III `f 1 MIN. II-f AMH.Y ~4 ! u IOltlu 11 SV r.l I rn.+ae SINCIC FAMILY r 1 OWELLINODISINIC 1 I MUL II-FAIAAY Al IAI IILU 1, r~jf OWit IfirOSpIIC1 10.0 AC. DWELIJNO WS11C1 ° to Ila..hflrl su•..1. 1 19.10 no. 1iN 1J,T61ro. 0 m 1 WHOLE FAMILY UCIACIIEO MtII II•f AMrIY • iC o { OWE L LINO UIS 111iC 1 d _ DWf 1, lIN0 UIS11UL•1 T. 441 ~C. 10.26 *c. q MUL I - fAMµ.Y 1'41 .o, S, UWELU IO UIS IIIICI ..II.Oil ll({I11(I,lll \Inl,l 1 I 1 SINOI f I AMII Y DF IACHFU ' Ir(/69 ~C, I ~ ~ OWL LLIIIO UIS IIIICi ~~-t-" ~ Ili~l'111y 11 nuuwu O nrlh f 1q I 00.34 me 6.66 Ao. 10.06 so' CRLIp . 1 Q I Jl:, ' fl ATTACHMENT 5 ogonda No... =D O GENETIC CENTS A,eitida item R 'AIM A T M 44 Ac rl 1 / i NNI i~p law R~ I\I p is t f f4' t )am$ I u.wra .y, / lIDh~lll~ IffK N1 'r 1 Yfw~ MM/. 14t t,RELIMINAIRIY PPLAT a too, AfOrr Hr arnrric cthrtR Lor 1. Weer , 0 w.ww ,Nw p~ SCAU UD C DATI Al, ZO. t",q J ~1 f• P it Agonda No. zaia[; b.- Agenda ktmn__ C~--sA ~ 1 Qalo _..__=i o(~j` 77•` .~.aT+ei 'v'~y .i,~+.~.~-..w • ••~r Derr +r ~'-~g-- • I f~ 1 - C ~ ~Ir ~ j 1 T C 1, J It 1 12 " .2.1790 rrda NO. Acjeoda ltom- -15 .319 CT99C MINUTES ATTACHMENT 6 R3tn May 4, 1992 Page 5 STAFF RECOMMENDEDi Approval COMMISSIONERSi Gore made a motion to grant the variance. Kay seconded the motion, Motiln passed unanimously. ITEM f4 DRIVEWAY VARIANCjS - 4QAIUNSY AT LOOP 2881 Iwuchukwu presented t'o request. He said this request Is for an additional driveway ,n McKinnoy Street. A variance had been approved by the Pianni.LI and Zoning Commission prior to CTS9C assuming variance rempo.-sibility in 1985. City staff has been m,4ting with the owners for three months to work out an errangemant regarding this problem. The gas station has increased in size from what was proposed at the time of the variance. None of the driveways meets corner clearance requirements for an arterial street. The owners agreed to make some unusual exceptions, one of which was to designate all driveways as shared access, but to dedicate them to public use. Thou driveways will alwaym remain shared. That was one of the compromises the City worked out,with them. But, the key issue is that the variance had already been approved. This additional driveway which is for the vacant lot will also meet requirements. It can be shared to access the other properties. This is not proper but goes along with the fact that commercial property is very hard to sell without proper access. As for as staff is concerned, this is the best that can be made of the prior condition. Chadwick asked if there was any development plans for the vacant lot between this site ■nd the Genetic Center. Iwuchukwu said he had no knowledge of development. iwuohukwu said the access on Loop 288 will probably be the location of a median opening when Loop 288 is widened. Chadwick asked if there was one owner for the whole development. Iwuchukwu said there was three. Mike Cordell, one of the owners from lot State Bank came forward to address the commission. He said, the entire tract is approximately 10 acres. first State Bank owns the lower portion comprised of 3.68 sores, A corner has been sold to the K 7 Corporation. First State Bank proposes to retain 2 individual pad sites to the mouth. The owners of the property next to the Wnetic center propose to develop that into office space. The Joint access is a compromise. Cordell said in 1988, a Loop 286 Center was approved under planned development. There was three curb cuts approved. The layout proposed today better serves ■ll owners concerned. Chadwick said the commission would be approving the overall plan which includes 4 curb cuts, Iwuchukwu said 3 drive approaches were approved in 1985. The commission would be voting for relocation of those with this plan. i i~jer,da hlo, CTSSC MINUTES nQenya It m__~~._'!9 /May 4, 1991 page v halo __2 2- a STAFF RECOMMENDEDi Approval COMMISSIONERS1 Erwin made a motion to approve the entire curb cuts as proposed. White seconded the motion, Motion passed unanimously. ITEM 05 TRAFFIC M pAOrMENT ON BE u nn STREET Iwuchukwu presented the requested. He said there has been 3 major issues centered around this area. The control of traffic at the intersection of Bernard and Eagle, Sycamore and Bernard, and Highland and Bernard. Other additional problems are speeding on Bernard Street, parking and corner clearance, and vehicles parked close to the corners, staff has isolated these three intersections as where the majority of the problems exist. The intersection of Eagle and Bernard Street has one major problem. The high retaining wall on the northwest corner makes it diffi.ult to make a left turn maneuver or straight through crossing from the southbound approach. Staff looked at accident records and as of November 1991 there were 20 accidents within a 12 memth period. Those type accidents are accidents that would normally require something be done to manage the intersection. There are two major ways to manage an intersection with that volume of traffic. One is an all-way stop control. The other is a traffic signal. A traffic signal would cost approximately $50,000 - $80,000. Oita option looked into was to convert Bernard Street to one-way traffic northbound beginning from Eagle Drive to Hickory Street or to any of the intermediate streets. Staff received so many letters in opposition to that which was presented in the last two meetings, The majority of the residences do not want conversion to one-way traffic. Most of the responses received wanted a traffic signal. one of the major reasons staff is not recommending the signal is the funding process. No funding is available to signalise that Intersection now. Normally, It would be placed on the CIP process. It you place an intersection on a CIP plan, It would be installed within five years based on funding availability. To solve the problem for the southbound approach, staff recommended one-way traffic northbound. If any accident should happen at the northwest corner$ it would Impact the City more. Sycamore and Bernard is another intersection that staff has frequently received complaints., It is currently a two-way stop intersection. Staff did counts'in 1999 and 1994 and it did not meet warrants for a 4-way stop control. Staff has talked to several people and there is a general consensus for a 4-way stop sign at 'his location. corners were painted yelLow at the' intersection, but there are still several misses. The speed on Sycamore, most of the time, is not within the speed limit. Staff doesn't know to what extent a 4-way stop would go in minimising speed, Staff is recommending a 4-way stop because of overwhelming citizens demand even though it does not meet warrants, /7 i arrm,x~,. E, ~l t~ k 1*4CrI n_ti.. 1 F 1 `~YFI IYY~.1 r + 1 ~ ~ I ~ Iyl 1 I I , I ti j / • 1 1 ~ 1 I ti j/ • 1 I j W W iG i Y I a n I 1 1 1 I 1 ~ I 1 I 1 • 49 3L90 ® IMF r1~•~r'i.1'' N ~ d 44 ,y ~i ATTACHMENT 7' Apnnda hlo, - ya D?~._____ Agenda IIm-141-A-_ 1 i~ r i i 111 "I a )yea rw.. wr rwwr wr r aw•' l7Ry _ 1 1 +U r r r ' r a rrr • ~~.~~wr ~r±w~i ~ i I I `i p„ 1. a I , e- L D ~ ~ I V`Jr r~H"u. "rrN ul5'pt'f~a)Iro"I~. I c~~ I n ~l Iwarn+ I ro l' hq r. c I RA., I \1lr pp / (All III I sI l Nro1H ~ R NI In 1 ~ ~lel~ I wawrl I 111 I ~ \ h / ~ I I $ F UfJlnl Yii I I II.I. YINIwIY. r 00 5 , I ' YFI'i~ 11 elR _ wur bM 1. HI! I .J.-_.}iu!ZY_L~, '1 Ie SIN AI II 1 I , 1 I, 1 Ir+m~N, + I I 1}I V I tl 1 1 ~'i1 I PVMtl ' ~ I 1II Nl wIl 1 f ' I 'IU. YM AIYI H I 1 1/J nlNan Lela eelnne .rur. 1_ 1 I (I lal lj / { I PRELWWARr PLAT r AMI 9a p~~ R "e 0q1Ip159n1q / tel i LA Mot b1 A919 ~'t➢nQPm 288 liiq nMNraI MO. IlM / I nwwr\ ~ r 6®re ' i ' . WI I S, If mnd I uvN.n. R-10cli Ong ' _ Mlllbli--• ~ ill. ♦~a.tlly ✓_~.nyu¢vll . - ' AN imn" n vs❑I., jm,uf I m, rO ME • cirr of DwmroN ON?I[R/ O[H.LANIEN Icofmrv OF OFNTON rev sort e.I,« x Mala r um r rnen~rrs - K .-:1KH-tom. SWIE OF rEXAE o eei ID7 a R r o of iie d Nlli\ fl 1p01 "RNpr RAM A. , NUSrl Ri NIIN, II coNrAWNQ *J? AICNS /SMi NL~ IUAGAd~ ~11 • ~ tl+N INM Ib11~11 I i II ,i ~ s Fj Abe lcla PJO. _f~ nQenda Ilont_~~ MINUTES Planning and Zoning Commission PRAr? June 24, 1992 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas, was held on Wednesday, June 24, 1992, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 215 East McKinney. Present: Jim Engelbrecht, Judd Holt, Mary Evelyn Huey, and William Kamman Absent: Ivan Glasscock, Fran Morgan Pad Marvin Wills Present from the Staff: Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning and Development; Owen Yost, Urban Planner; Karen Feshari, Urban Planner; Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney, Tanya Cooper, Assistant City Attorney, Jerry Cosgrove, Water/Wastewater, DavidSalmon, Engineering; Darlene Weatherly, Executive Secretary Chairman Holt called the meeting to order. I. Minutes It was moved by Dr. Huey, seconded by Mr. Englebrecht, and unanimously carried (4-0) to approve the amended minutes of March 25, 1992, Motion was made by Mr. Engelbrecht, seconded by Dr. Huey, and unanimously carried (4.0) to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of May 27, 1992. It was also moved by Mr. Englebrecht, seconded by Bill Kamman, and unanimously carried (4.0) to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of June 10, 1992. 11. Consent Agenda Consider the final plat of Lot 1, Block 1 of the Kern Personal Care Center Addition from 4.857 acres of previously unplatted land. The commission voted unanimously (4-0) to approve the consent agenda. III. Hold a public hearing and consider rezoning a 10.18 acre tract of land from PD-41 to General Retail (conditioned) on property located at the southwest corner of E. McKinney and Loop 288. Thirteen property owners were notified within the 200' radius; two letters were returned in favor and zero in opposition. Staff Report: Ms. Feshari presented the staff report (attached). ~D. r; Agonda No. Agentlnliorn_~S 73~ Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes v June 24, 1992 Page 2 Mr. Karnman asked about the location of the curb cuts which were in the original detailed plan presented March 25, 1992. Ms. Feshari pointed to these curb cuts on the preliminary plat. Dr. Huey asked if the dimensions were the same from the previous plan. Ms. Feshari indicated that the dimensions were not the same. The plan which was presented in March did not include all the area to the south. The detailed plan approved in 1986 for the 2.1 acre tract was the entire area, starting from McKinney Street going down to the southern property line. The owners of the property split that detailed site plan and sold a portion to the K-7 Corporation and because of problems which have occurred, the current plan is being presented. Dr. Huey asked about the plan for the corner lot and whether or not this was a reduction in what was considered before. Ms. Feshari stated it was basically the same, with the exception that there is more land now. The current site plan is what was approved by the Traffic Safety Support Commission only for the purpose of showing the curb cuts. The conditions in the recommendation were reviewed carefully with all of the applicants and they all agreed with the conditions. Ms. Feshari emphasized with conditioned zoning, more flexibility is allowed to the citizens. The same use of a gasoline station is being proposed for the site. Mr. Bngelbrecht asked the distance to that curb cut on Loop 288 to the corner. Mr. Salmon indicated it was approximately 115 feet from the curb cut on the loop to the corner of McKinney Street. On the last submittal,it was about 50-55 feet. He added the minimum for the intersection of two arterials in the ordinance is 250 feet. Petitioner: Mike Cordell, First State Bank of Denton, indicated this plan was better that what was previously submitted. All the owners of the property feel the land will be more marketable considering the overall 10 acres of land use and the traffic flow therein. K-7 is more pleased with this particular clan. The city staff was complimented for working extremely well with the applicants in putting the final proposal together. Mr. Cordell noted that for the remaining pad sites, fast-food restaurants were being targeted, and the remaining property would be on the lines of the Genetics Center and office space use. Good traffic flow would be experienced between both properties. r~oncJaPto..--9~2 Gr.~O-~µ Anenda IImn S ~ Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes June 24, 1992 Page 3 Dr. Huey asked how wide the two entrances were. into the service stati0o Lrea. Mr. Cordell responded that it was approximately 35 feet to the nearest throat on the K-7 site providing adequate space for maneuvering large vehicles. No one was present to speak in favor or in opposition to the request for rezoning. Ms. Feshari stated that staff recommends approval of Z-92.009 with the following conditions: maximum building height, 35 feet; minimum FAR for entire site, ,36; curb cuts as approved by Citizen Traffic Safety Support Commission, as shown on preliminary plat of Loop 288 Centre; along the southern property line(s) of this tract, the developer(s) must comply with landscaping requirements as outlined on the staff report; a comprehensive pedestrian access plan as shown on the proposed preliminary plat of Loop 288 Centre, Lots 1, 2, 31 and 4, Block I must be complied with and allowed uses as shown on the list of permitted uses which was attached to the staff report, Chairman Holt closed the public hearing, Motion was made by Mr. Kamman, seconded by Mr, Holt, and unanimously carried to recommend approval of Z-92.009 with the conditions stipulated, Consider the preliminary plat and comprehensive pedestrian access plan of Loop 288 Centre, Lots 10 2, 3, and 4, Block 1 on property located at the southwest corner of E. McKinney and Loop 288, Staff Report, Ms. Feshari stated the preliminary plat contains approximately 8,64 acres of land and is located at the southwestern corner of E, McKinney and Loop 288. She further explained that the only difference between the preliminary plat and the zoning case is that the Genetics Center is not included in the preliminary plat as it is already a legal subdivision, Ms. Feshari reported a comprehensive pedestrian access plan is reflected on the plat. She indicated the location of the sidewalks which go through the middle of the property instead of going along McKinney and Loop 288, 1;i addition, the access easement that goes along the middle of the property stops at the bottom of the property line for continuation when the tract to the south is developed, No road improvements are warranted as both streets are state highways. There Is a 75 foot easement between Lots 1 through 3 and Lots 4 which contains as 18 inch sanitary sewer line and a 20 inch water line, The Texas Department of Transportation has o2-O2` , ii t t CITY -,,,,COUNCI] I 00oooooaoaooQOO~ocooo 0 O 4 ~ W ' 57 ~J O * w v' o00~~~04C000Gflp~G~~ , X., T ~a DATE: 07/07/92 CITY COUNCIL REPORT t~ondaNo, (?"Z QaOa--r~-•. Agenda Item TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council W10 FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Z-92-014, AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC USE PERMIT (SUP) NO. 192 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission, at its meeting of May 27, 1992, recommended approval (4-0). SUMMARY: Amend SUP Nu. 192, allowing for a new expiration date of May 7, 1998 for a horse-training facility at 3505 Teasley Lane. pACKrg4UND: I See P&Z Reoort. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR, GROUPS AFFECTED: Code Enforcement, Planning Department and Building Inspections FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Resp fully s bmitted Prepared by: Llc d V. Harrell city manager K ren K. Feshari f Urban Planner App oved: Fran obbins i4ICP Executive Director Planning and Development AXX00196 E3 ii a~ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT Tot Mayor and Members of the City Council Came No.s Z-92-014 Meeting Dates July 7, 1992 GENERAL INFORMATION Applioaints Lynn and Jerry Cott Trust under the Will of Chester H. Roth Sundown Ranch 3505 Teasley Lane Denton, TX 76205 Current owners Same Requested Actions Amend Specific Use Permit No. 192 allowing for a new expiration date of May 7, 1998 for a horse training facility. Location and Sires A 173 acre tract of land located on the east side of Teasley Lane, known as 3505 Teasley Lane. HISTORY On May 5, 1987, the City Council approved a Specific Use Permit at 3505 Teasley Lane for a horse training track (ordinance 87-081). On May 17, 1988, the City Council approved the amendment to Ordinance no. 87-081 to provide for a new expiration date for the Specific Use Permit granted for a horse training park (Ordinance 88-089). The following condition was added: 3. If construction of the facility herein authorized has not begun in accordance with a building permit issued on or before May 7, 1993, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. On May 27, 1992, the Planning and zoning commission heard this case (Z-92-014) and recommended approval (4-0). 4 Fonda No, q~ D~a _ Agenda Item ~5 ?~~,8 Da~o ~ 7~ 7-- a (Case Z-92-014) 3 July 7, 1992 ANALYSIS The applicant has requested an extension of five (5) years from the approved date of May 7, 1993, in hopes that the Texas Racing commission will approve a Class I, Metroplex track in the Dallas- Fort Worth area. The Planning and Zoning Commission does not believe this will be a problem so long as the other two (2) conditions as stated in ordinance 87-081 still apply. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval (4-0) of the following: Condition #3 of ordinance 88-089 be amended to reflect an expiration date of May 7, 1998. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Ordinance 88-089 3. Ordinance 87-081 4. Minutes of May 27, 1992 P&Z Meeting. 5. Ordinance AXX00168 Page 2 _ ~~rrrr ii ~4wncia No. 902 DAD ATTACHMENT 1 AJ~11~3Ilom~s~ Z 92-014 Cott Specific Use Permit NORTH ~t ~V<\'f, / J 01 -Ti SF- 1,0 1 , ` 1 PD., A ! I' ! P PD-65 6-192 [Sc 1G 1`-- - i ~ I I A C I -(V- r PD- 68 ~ 404 >1 r S-140 1 Date: 5/15/42 Scale: NONE 3 !r :i }t ATTACHMENT 2 ~Oo P10. ~4 Agenda ftem` ,~5.3 c3 NO. s~ ~3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE N0, 87-081 TO PROVIDE FOR AN EXPIRATION DATE FOR THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT GRANTED THEREIN FOR A HORSE TRAINING PARK FOR 173,3 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT 3505 TEASLEY LANE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That Section I of Ordinance No. 87-081, providing for a specific use permit for a horse training park for 173.3 acres of land located at 3505 Teasley Lane, is amended by adding an additional condition thereto, to read as fellows: 3. If construction of the facility herein authorized has not begun in accordance with a building permit issued on or before May 7, 1993, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. SECTION II. That a copy of this ordinance shall be attached to Ordinance No, 87-081, showing the amendment herein made. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and aTed 1. PASSED AND APPROVED this the ay of 1988. V RAY B HEN , MAYOR ATTEST; NIFER ALTERS O , CITY S APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY. BY: `Yyl U~~ l,781L ~ A ondaNo, Agentla 11nm4~0_s 3 ATTACHMENT 3 N 0 , AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A HORSE TRAINING PARK, AS SAID PERMIT APPLIES TO 173,3278 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT 3505 TEASLEY LANE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE. MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $1,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That, pursuant to Article 10 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances, a specific use permit for a training park for horses is hereby granted for the property located at 3505 Teasley Lane, as is more particularly shown in Exhibit t-A attached herein and incorporated herein by reference, subject to the following conditions and restrictions: 1. That the property shall be developed and used in accordance with the site plan shown In Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 2. The training park shall not be used for events which are to be open to the general public. SECTION II. The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14tH day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Crdinances of the City of Denton, 'texas, under Ordinance No. speto show such cifications, permitted use, subject as amended, l the above scohereby nditionsamended SECTION III. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby rinds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things, for the character of the district and for its pecvliar suitability for particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate of land for the maximum banefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and ,its citizens. SECTIONIV, Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of t punishablecertificate by saefine enot requireme thereof gutI,ty of fa amisd misdemeanor permit i ;r 1 J ~ - ~gonda Nn..~_y~ O O AE7e+ida t{onf_ .~S ~~/3 exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1,000,00). Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ordi- nance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be punished within the limits above, SECTION V. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or applicatiothereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity, SECTION VI, That this ordinance shall become effectivo fourteen 14 `days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of f t , 1986. i E 4RAMEN MAY OH DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: Rib N 1 bR b S, CI 'CH T CIT F DEN ON9 TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: 5-1921PACE TWO / a, i fl mpdocs\cott P{~Ondi1'0.._ =_d Diu ORDINANCE NO, _ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NO. 192 AS IT APPLIES TO 173 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT 3505 TEASLEY LANE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 87-081, the City Council granted a specific use permit (No. 192) for 173 acres of land located on the east side of Teasley Lane for a horse training facility; and WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 88-089, the Cite Council amended the permit to provide that it would expire if a building permit for the horse training facility was not issued on or before May 7, 1992; and WHEREAS, Lynn and Jerry Cott have applied for an amendment to extend the expiration date to May 7, 1998; and WHEREAS, on May 27, 1992, the Planning and zoning Commission recommended approval of the proposed amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council has found that granting the extensi_., will not violate any of the required conditions of Division 4 of Article III of Chapter 35 of the Code of Ordinances; NOW, THERE- FORE, THE COUNCIL OF' THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That Section I of Ordinance No. 87-081, as amended by Ordinance No. 88-089, is further amended by amending paragraph 3 to read as follows: 3. If construction of the facility herein authorized has not begun in accordance with a building permit issued on or before May 7, 1998, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. SECTION II. That a copy of this ordinance shall be attached to Ordinance No. 87-081, to show the amendment herein made. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 7.992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR su { i j ~ j 2~1 fi n".li Adnnda ~~o, . Dn Ito ADunda Ilom_~ S !r` D3to fly ATTESTt JENNIFER WALTERSt.CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY By t i 0. h{iantla No. -.~~fl..~¢ 401 Agejju3I1em ieS P&Z Minutes U0 - r - .Z May 27, 1992 /d3 Page 7 of Hobson, Ill, Hold a public hearing and consider approving a detailed plan for San Jacinto Plaza being a portion of Planned Development 6 on a 12,022 acre tract of land, Staff Report: Mr, Robbins reported that a site plan for this site was approved in 1984 by plat but no zoning ordinance was adopted, This purpose of this case is to adopt a site plan by ordinance, 'rho case Is city initiated, One of the concerns expressed at a neighborhood meeting regarded restaurants. They will not be listed as a permitted use. In favor: Mark Fleege, 1516 San Gabriel, stated that he Is the president of the Township 11 neighborhood association, He thanked the Commission for rezoning hb neighborhood and asked what uses will be permitted with the proposed site plan, A list of uses was provided to him. He said that the concern of Township 11 is that the undeveloped pad sites be consistent with the existing uses and not be businesses like Pep Boys. He asked the Commission to approve this cast so there won't be any more of that same typo of problem, Mr, Robbins said that this case should make that clear for this site. Mr. Fleege said that he hopes that doing this In advance will solve some problems downstream. No one was present to speak in oppasition to the case. Recommendation. Mr. Robbins sated that staff recommends approval of 2.92.011. Vice-chairmata Kamman closed the public hearing. Motion was made by Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Mr, Engelbrecht, and unanimously carried (40) to recommend approval of Z•92.011, N. Hold a public hearing and consider an amendment to Specific Use Permit 192 on a 173,E acre tract of land located at 3505 Teasley Lane for the purpose of extending the permit expiration date for a horse training facility. 14 notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the tract; one was 9. Nonda No. AnemmNlem_ 5 '°`3f P&Z Minutes May 27, 1992 /l 13 Page S U received back in favor and two were in opposition to the amendment. Staff Report; Mr, Yost reported that this request Is to extend the existbig Specific Use Permit (SUP) for five years. The use is not on the ground yet. A regional horse ttafning facility is proposed. If the State approves a horse track In the area, this would be a training facility used in conjunction with it The facility would not be for spectators. The, 173 acre tract of land is located on the east side of Teasley Lane. Petitioner; Jerry Cott, Sundown Ranch, stated that they are active In Arabian showing and breeding but the training facility would be for Thoroughbreds. It Is probable that there will be a Class 1 track in this county or an adjacent one. They have spent many dollars on their farm and have had inquiries about their training facility from around the world. Running horses are delicate. It is not good to drive them very for, A racing stable will stay in an area for a season, They demand expensive care for the animals. The trainers would live in the community and buy their groceries here. The horses would be trucked to the track on race day and brought back, His training track was designed by engineers in Kentucky that design other race tracks and things for the federal government, The track will be one mile and built up, It is not intended to be a public racetrack. It does not affect the aquifer. He has checked with the Texas Water Commission about the water rights. Bent Oaks, the ptoposed new library and fire station are located across the street ENT has some fairly high antenna and their is a microwave tower in the area, The rest of the property Is for sale. Sundown Ranch Is not, The Denton State School is located to the east and the border is heavily wooded, They intend to leave it that way. They have a park like setting, They intend to compete and attract wealthy people to their facility. If no Class 1 track Is developed in the Metroplex, then this facility will not be built. Mr. Kamman asked if the facility will be compatible if homes are built on adjacent tracts. Mr. Cott said that all they will have will be trucks which deliver horses and then go away and trucks taking horses to the track. There will not be a lot of car traffic. This will enhance the area for homes better than microwave towers. Some other area developments are also nice. Mr. Kamman asked if there will be a loud speaker. Mr, Cott said no. Aperrdi Rom _ ?,5 P&Z Minutes Tom` May 27, 1992 Page 9 Ms. Huey asked how long construction would take. Mr. Cott said that the track will be made out of special material, not just dirt. That is the problem with the track in Weatherford. It could take a year to build. No one was present to speak in favor of the extension. Opposed; Nancy Paddock, Krum, stated that she is speaking for Mr. Khraesh, His property is adjacent to Mr. Cott's, Mr. Khraesh purchased his property for single family uses. When Mr. Cott got his SUP It stopped Mr. Khraesh's development. That Is why his property Is for sale. No one wants to live next to a horse farm. Mr, Khraesh can't get an agricultural exemption and has to pay commercial taxes. He purchased his property when the zoning on Mr. Cott's land was compatible for single family and commercial usrs. This SUP has cost Mr. Khraesh a lot of money. Mr. Kamman asked when Mr. Khraesh purchased the land. Ms. Paddock said in 1984. Hannah Khraesh, 918 Live Oak, Dallas, sated that he came to this county in 1980. He purchased his property for development of 200 single family homes, not for cows and horses, He has been unable to do anything since the SUP was granted. There is only 20' between Mr. Cott's barn and the fence. He spent $1,500,000 on this land. Nobody will pay $10,000 an acre for a horse. It is not even good pasture land. If the I Commission approves this extension, it will cost him $1,500,000. Why say "Welcome to America" if a person can't depend on being able to develop. A horse ranch can be put somewhere else. Recommendation: Mr, Yost stated that staff recommends approval of the amended dale for the SUP with maintenance of the other existing conditions for this SUP. Rebuttal: Mr. Cott stated that the zoning for his Sable as sell 1 place tanwhen Mr, s of hay Khraesh bought his land. As for the area pastures, h per year off of his. Cumulative zoning has made it difficult for him to do anything other than a ranch with his property. Mr. Khraesh has wanted to do multifamily development and he has uffered him money for his land. Mr. Khraesh made a bad business decision and is upset. Ms. Huey asked Mr. Cott's tax status. Ar~nntlahlo, Oo~O_ Apendollcm~5~ X3,6_ lkto P&Z Minutes 992 May 277, , 1992 May Page 10 Mr, Cott said that he has an agricultural exemption for his homestead and one of the barns, He does not know why Mr, Krlesh can't get an exemption. Mr. Kriesh said that Mr, Cott never offered him any money and told him that he hated his land, Vice-chairman Kamman closed the public hearing. Mr. Glasscock said that nothing is proposed to be changed, The Commission Is just being asked to give a five year extension to what has already been done, He moved to recommend approval of Z-92.014 as recommended by staff, Motion was seconded by Mr, Engelbrecht and unanimously carried (4.0). V, Consider approval of an alternative landscape plan for Cracker Barrel Restaurants. Staff Report: Mr, Yost stated that the proposed Cracker Barrel restaurant does not quite meet the landscape ordinance and this alternative landscape plan has been submitted, 17% of the street yard will be landscaped instead of 20o but there will be 57 trees instead of the required 45, There is a small drive from the site to University that magnifies the size of the street yard, Staff recommends approval of the alternative landscape plan, Ms. Huey asked about the dotted line on the drawing, Mr, Yost said It is an easement. Mr, Engelbrecht moved to approve the alternative landscape plan for Cracker Barrel Restaurant. Motion was seconded by Mr, Glasscock and carried unanimously (4-0), VC. Hold a public hearing and consider the preliminary and final replats of Lots 1, 21 & 3, Block 1 darike Addition, being a replat of Lots 1.7, Block 1 Dale Brown Addition, Staff Report: Mr. Yost reported that the tract is 1.6326 acres located on the cast side of Bonnie Brae a pproxtmately 800 feet south of University Drive, The only public Improvements to this site are two fire hydrants, The hydrants will be installed by the City Utility Department and paid for by the developer/ The zoning on this tract Is Planned Development 144. A detailed plan for three medical office buildings has been approved, Prior to the PD zoning, the property was zoned and platted for seven SF-10 lots, L, YI i r tC IT COUNCIL OO~O`~ h DOS OOC 41 ~~~0d~ o g c a c c a n°°°°o~ DATE: 07/07/92 CITY COUNCIL REPORT Agenda yo. A Agendallonn 3Ci TO, Mayor and Members of the City Council Calo,__7~21::: 7A FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTt Z--92-011, APPROVAL OF THE DETAILED PLAN OF SAN JACINTO PLAZA RE_COMMENDATIONt The Planning and Zoning commission at its May 27, 1992 meeting recommended approval (4-0). SUMARY: Approve a details('. plan for a portion of Planned Development No, 6 on a 12,2077 acre tract of land. The San Jacinto Plaza is an existing use. BACKGROUNDt See P&Z Report. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR QROUPS AFFECT: Township II residences, Plarning Department anti Building Inspections. FISCAL IMPAC t N/A Respeo ully submitted: Prepared by: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Ra en E. F Shari Urban Planner Approved: Frank 4H, bin AICP Executive Director Planning and Development AXX00199 Non6t No. ~e Dao Apendd Item. les DAto c PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT Tos Mayor and Members of the City Council Cade No,s Z-92-011 Meeting Dater July 7, 1992 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicants City of Denton 215 East McKinney Denton, TX 76201 Current Owners FDIC 550 17th NW Washington, DC 20429 Requested Actions Approve a detailed plan for a portion of Planned Devolopment No, 6 also known as the San Jacinto Plaza, Location and SiZes A 12.2077 acre tract of land looated eaet of I-35, northwe,it of San Jacinto Blvd., and east of Piney Creek Blvd, Surrounding Land Use and zonings North - PD-61 residential (in process of being rezoned SF-10) South - CommercialF Animart East - PD-61 Golden Triangle Mall West - PD-61 Pep Boys and Wolfes Nursery Denton Development Plans Low intensity Area HISTORY on August 23, 1969, Planned Development 6 was approved with a comprehensive site plan. Township II, Phase I, and San Jaointo Plaza were approved by ordinance for commercial, single-family, multi-family, and duplex uses. The language in the original ordinance (69-35) implied that the uses of the PD could be changed by platting. konda No. Agenda Ilan S ti3C N10 May 270 1992 (Z-92-011) Page 2 In September of 1984, San Jacinto Plaza was replatted and a site plan was approved. No ordinance exists for San Jacinto Plaza. On May 27, 1992, the Planning and Zoning commission hold a public hearing on Z-92-011 and recommended approval (4-0). 71N11Lk',1r8 Because this use is in existence, no policies of the Denton Development Plan will be analyzed. The purpose for this application is two-fold, 1) It is an administrative exercise within Planned Development 61 and 2) The neighbors in the adjoining Township IT, Phase T have expressed concern about allowed uses in the shopping center, At a neighborhood meeting conducted on April I1 1992, concern was expressed specifically regarding restaurants at this location due to odor and increased traffic. A traffic impact analysis was conducted on this tract in September of 1984. The analysis was based on retail uses, specifically 11dry- goods" type uses. Although theoretically, eating establishments not exceeding 5,000 square feet could be located herei in reality, due to the road design at Wolf's Nursery and Dallas Drive, additional traffic would create safety hazards, As this area is designated as a low intensity area, a disproportionate share of intensity was allocated with the zoning. Therefore the existing structure as well as the additional square footage as shown on the site plan, should bu limited to the attached table of permitted uses. RECOXHONDATXON The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval of Z-92-011 approving the detailed plan with the attached table of permitted r uses, which excludes restaurants as a permitted use (4-0). 11 s A~e,~rla Ilam~_~C , mfo May 27, 1992_ (Z-92-011) Page 3 ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Reduction of detailed plan 3. Reduction of Pp-6 comprehensive site plan 4. List of Permitted [Tees 5, Minutes of May 27, 1992 P&Z Meeting 6. Ordinance i i AXX0016C I Aponda No, _y~ -~D Agenda lltim,_.~5.''~`, 3C ATTACHMENT 01I0 Z 92-011 San Jacinto Plaza NORTH SHADY OAKS OR. ~ r Slag OY OAKS OR, r~~ 1 Cis SANTA FE _ ~MILOERNESS \ l \ 1 POMF.RyPLANT~ W~ a' FAA EC7O $ LIEF TRAtL J I~ S' rlT. \ MATER ipERTHENT _ r1 S''OlNf \ G J~ s ~Cq,yy 4t~;RCEe ~O JyoY C 4 r , ,poO 7! / ~q ~v~AUAY !ct~' I ~ y``~G SITE yam. IllIl1 p ~ ~ I O4r O~ ~ 1 \P /L ~Q,tJac ow y~ a~f~gfsr O~J~~ a \ yyff ~ Yy F V~ ~ CO JRI NYC f~H~psr ~ ONHOST LANE -_•-~L~NC 'fLAAK _CA X _ _AiE'M00~ ORIYE,Y /Q \ ',VPER 04YE~ SMEMSE P. HAP L 'I ~y Ntl9~ 4~ -=~JfJJI / SHIP5 hates 5/15/92 Scales NONE tJ A'T'TACHMENT 2 . ~{}ontla ~ln. 6 D lTtrnda ttom .CAS '4i3C. r r r 1 fir` 3 r~ : wl~ ;rl'~ .a Ipp 1~ rre ` ~ I.I4 J4 rl '4/ ~ ~ h I r ~ • i P fi C~ nl . •1\ a t ~ F~ J r rl ` • 111\ ♦ .oi •nM/' 0 Id inrrw•. ~~ri~.a+ 1w~.wil tl,7`y ll`~ r ~ }~lYy 1 ' J tl 1 ra 1 ~ II • Y r ~ s• ATTACHMENT 3 4011da NO, 7A ~~Q_.._ - \ Dilu ~ i y r ter ' If _ r~ ~ t t A'rk+n/ra' /IMAw/ Iwulx~N.•N Iw '2~31 Nit- \ Iw ` it, a 1 x 1 \ ere. it \ ipere. CA, ` TAY .lY S ,r ~~•--~~v /Nt arL~ r~~/ A l / r /r~~, /.;r/~ U / ' • //`'fir ,j~ /fad f'~ j/~/i r / 1 .IrIMl4{IMYe N \ C.... ry~~ry~ R 1 'Pe .AMd e , YA-'! a e we talc x . n »n, +emn O% ww a na nW ww, a a awnr n 14 Gtr a mtw r TRIANGLE PARK •I,NTON, TEXAN \ OWNmat RANK 11CKEIMN & AS"CIATEB w1umm }MINI e.~t~~ RRRIIIRIl~wu,eb.____._nrt'41411Lf}rr ~u.~afy,_ , inaYG'.n F~ ?3 'f r. A Ll A(pndo itom~2s Attachment 4 D-ite - -1 Permitted Use Animal clinic or Hospital (no outside runs or pens) Antique Shop Art Gallery or Museum Bakery or Confectionery Shop (Retail) church or Rectory Cleaning and Pressing Small Shop and Pickup college or University or Private School Community Center (Public or Private) custom Personal service shop Day Nursery or Kindergarten School Drapery, Needlework or Weaving Shop Florist or Garden Shop Greenhouse or Plant Nursery (Retail only) Handicraft Shop Household Appliance Service and Repair Institutions of Religious or Philanthropio Nature Laundry or Cleaning Self service Mimeograph, stationery or Letter shop New Auto Parts Sales Stores Nursing Home or Residence Home for Aged Off Premise Sale of Beer and/or Wine off Street Parking Incidental to Main Use Off Street Remote Parkinq, Offices, Professional and Administrative Public Library Retail Stores and Shops School, Business or Trade School, Private School, Public or Denominational Studio for Photographer, Musician, Artist or Health Telephone, Business Office Telephone Line and Exchange Switching or Relay station ,z ALL00278\2000,7 A( r d0 ltoht 2S C' Dijo ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINA WCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF A DETAILED PLAN FOR A 12.2077 ACRE TRACT OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 61 ALSO KNOWN AS SAN JACINTO PLAZA AND BEING DESCRIBED AS LOTS 2A, 3A, 5A, AN". 6A, BLOCK A, REPLAT PART OF BLOCK A, TOWNSHIP II, PHASE II, CITY" OF DENTON, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS] PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a 12.2077 acre tract of land is a portion of Planned Development No, 61 adopted by ordinance 69-35, enacted on the 23rd day of August, 1969, also known as the San Jacinto Plaza and being described as Lots 2A, 3A, 5A, and 6A, Block A, Replat Part of Block A, Township II, Phase II, City of Denton, Denton County, Texasj WHEREAS, the City of Denton has applied for approval of a detailed plan for said 12.2077 acre tract; and WHEREAS, on May 27, 1992, the Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval of the detailed plan; and EREAS plan will be,inhcompliance n with the Denton Development h Plan; aNOW,- THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSI SECTION i. That Exhibit A, which is attached to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference, is approved as the Detailed Plan for the 12.2077 acre portion of the district which is described as Lots 2A, 3A, $A, and 6A, Block A, Replat Part of Block A, Township II, Phase II, City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, in accordance with Article IV of Chapter 35 of the Code of Ordinances, BEOT~•ION . That the City~s official zoning map is amended to show the change in zoning district classification. SECTION TTr That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $20000. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. SEOT_ Icy, That this ordinance shall become effective four- teen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official news- paper of the City of Denton, Texas, within to (10) days of the date of its passage. 8. E is Aponda No, Agonda ltom-, se Dmo A) PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ day of , 1992.. BOB CASTLEBERRYf MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERSo CITY SECRETARY BY: i APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCHe CITY ATTORNEY } I, r II 9, rtm^. a r Agenda No. 070 Agenda Item. ~S~G ()a(o EXHIBIT A 1) General Location Map -one Page 2) site Plan Map - one page 3) List of Permitted Uses - one Page 1 1 I I EXHIBIT A d~rnda No. ~;~e~ A~nntla Ileoi ieS''~~C.__ Z 92.011 San Jacinto Plaza Dalo .__?7-_ NORTH SHADY OAX$ oil. I '~'~'S~ar;r ~dx5 DR, ~dF I C;* 11NtA :E ~ERI,'65! ~ N 9~ ~LAJL POWER YA1ER tpEAt Cox .44 F o J c' qa cA 4.0 ej. A, tp11 tit Sa j E x\ Gay a ov oa !T C Y1Nl1*I1 LA W 44' \ '7j OLAM CRIV I-' At W`e AP \ \~f Av "v Q \ 41 -yI HAP v I s nr 141« 5/15/92 So" NONE is J, i EXHIBIT A S+ ar, 1: QAx aiHl}1T h.~~andaliuin_5'3C 44 l't . ~ I fff 1 1 ~ 1 ~J i ; if, I ~ol~ ~f Y ~S EXHIBIT A A~ontlaPlo..~sc~_ vQ...VO. Agendaltom-ze-S2~~C Wto Permitted Uses Animal Clinic or Hospital (no outside runs or pens) Antique Shop Art Gallery or Museum Bakery or Confectionary Shop (Retail) Church or Rectory Cleaning and Pressing Small Shop and Pickup college or University or Private School community Center (Public or Private) custom Personal Service Shop Day Nursery or Kindergarten school Drapery, Needlework or weaving shop Florist or Carden Shop Greenhouse or Plant Nursery (Retail only) Handicraft Shop Household Appliance Service and Repair Institutions of Religious or Philanthropic Nature Laundry or cleaning self service Mimeograph, Stationery or Letter shop New Auto Parts Salem Stores Nursing Home or Residence Home for Aged Off Premise Sale of Beer and/or Wine Off Street Parking Incidental to Main Use Oft Street Remote Parking Offices, Professional and Administrative Public Library ` Retail Stores and Shops School, Business or Trade School, Private school, Public or Denominational Studio for Photographer, Musician, Artist or Health Telephone, Business Office Telephone Line and Exchange Switching or Relay Station i ;r t r~ F00nda No, Agenda 11em--Ie.S'r~ _ P&Z Minutes 7=,9,g May 27, 1992 1-6 /S Page 7 l/ of Hobson, III. Hold a public hearing and consider approving a detailed plan for San Jacinto Plaza being a portion of Planned Development 6 on a 12,022 acre tract of land, Staff Report: Mr. Robbins reported that a site plan for this site was approved in 1984 by plat but no zoning ordinance was adopted. This purpose of this case is to adopt a site plan by ordinance, The case Is city initiated, One of the concerns expressed at a neighborhood meeting regarded restaurants. They will not be listed as a permitted use, In favor: Mark Fleege, 1516 San Gabriel, stated that he is the president of the Township 11 neighborhood association, He thanked the Commission for rezoning his neighborhood and asked what uses will be permitted with the proposed site plan, A list of uses was provided to him. He said that the concern of Township It is that the undeveloped pad sites be consistent with the existing uses and not be businesses like Pep Boys, He asked the Commission to approve this case so there won't be any more of that same type of problem. Mr, Robbins said that this case should make that clear for this site. Mr. Fleege said that he hopes that doing this in advance will solve some problems downstream, No one was present to speak In opposition to the case, Recommendation: Mr, Robbins sated that staff recommends approval of 2.92.011, Vice-chairman Kamman closed the public hearing. Motion was made by Mr, Glasscock, seconded by Mr, Engelbrecht, and unanimously carried (4.0) to recommend approval of Z-92.011, IV, Hold a public hearing and consider an amendment to Specific Use Permit 192 on a 1731. acre tract of land located at 3505 Teasley lane for the purpose of extending the permit expiration date for a horse training facility, 14 notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the tract; one was 1,el EI COUNCII t _ i 1 T.Lru OF a ~~O e O OO~~a { ro r000o o D ti ~Op ° v, Y e ~p0` ~oacaccaoQo M I t' Agenda Ilan C~_ CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Rite TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell r City Manager SUBJECT; Resolution esolution approving a Grant Offer from the Administration for tha Runway Overlay and ' Aviation Taxiway/Apron areas, w-al emen ts to the RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Airport Advisory Hoard and Airport Staff that the Grant Offer from the Federal Aviation Administration be accepted. SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration has approved asphalt the Runway and micro-seal the Taxiway and Apron areas, and to re all surface markings. The total Project is $900 000a wiProject th this Grant Overlay with $810,000 of the amount required. paint providing BACKGROUND: The City of Denton has submitted a Preapplication 1989, 1990 and 1991, for this Improvement in PROGRA.Mg L DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEDO This agreement will not affect ;.r, oth%,r Department or Group, FISCAL IMPACT; There will be a cost of $90000 dollars to the City funding, The City Council approved the use of Unreserved Funds nfrom the General Fund balance in the 1991-.92 Budget Process for this Project, for 10% percent Respe ully s b itted: i Pre ` _ ~ L1 V V. Harrell City Manager Joe omp p z Airport Manager Approved: Rick Svehla Deputy City Manager E' E J A i ngonrfq No, a ~o~a Agenda Item ~M a ~as TO: The Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Joe Thompson, Airport Manager DATE. July 2, 1992 SUBJECT: A Resolution approving a Grant offer from the Federal Aviation Administration for the Runway overlay and improvements to the Taxiway and Apron areas. The Federal Aviation Administration has approved a project to overlay with asphalt the Runway and micro-seal the Taxiway and Apron areas, and to repaint all surface markings. The Project is for $900,000, with the Federal Aviation Administration paying 908 of the cost or $810,000, and the City of Denton will have to pay 108 of the cost or $90,000. It is the recommendation of the Airport Advisory Board and Airport Staff that the Grant offering from the Federal Aviation Administration in the amount of $810,000 dollars bo accepted. j i S l~ I~ AAAOOA61 Agenda Ilern___[_~_ 9y RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A GRANT OFFER FROM THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $810,000 FOR THIS CONSTRUCTION OF DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AT THE DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT; AND PRO- VIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Denton has submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration an application for federal assistance for a grant of federal funds for a project for development of the Denton Municipal Airport] and WHEREAS, the Federal Aviation Administration has approved a project for development of the Airport consisting of the construc- tion of overlay and taxiway improvements; and WHEREAS, the Federal Aviation Administration has submitted to the City of Denton a Grant offer in the amount of Eight Hundred Ten Thousand ($810,000) Dollars for the construction of such improve- ments, together with a Grant Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: SECTD2_1__ That the City of Denton hereby accepts the Grant Offer and agrees to comply with all of the assurances and condi- tions contained in the Grant Agreement, and the City Manager of the City of Denton or his designee is hereby authorized to execute such Agreement, mediately upl4K tsThat this resolution shall become effective in- passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ day of _ r 1992, BOB C LEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: 'r uu))11 , a kgenda No. Af;wlda I{om Of kar ortrr~t Of TfQ 1Qf10f1 SOuthwesl RegW AlkansAS, Loulslana, FOrI WOO, Texas 76183.0000000666 Ft" Aye mw NOW VOACO, Okfahoma, AdmWitration Texas JUN E b 1992 The Honorable Bob Castleberry Mayor of Denton 215 East McKinney Denton, TX 76201 Dear Mayor Castleberryr Enclosed are the original and one copy of the Grant Offer, AIP Project No. 3-48-0067-07, for improvements at the Denton Municipal Airport. The improvements include overlaying Runway 17-35 as well as the rehabilitation of the taxiways and apron. This Grant Offer is financed from PY-9 2 funds, Please accept by resolution within 30 days from the date of the Grant Offer* After the Grant Offer has been accepted by resolution of the governing body of the city and executed, please return the original to us. The copy is for the city's files. sincerely, W H gh Lyon Assistant Division Manager, Airports Division Enclosure (2) oc (1) s Texas Department of Transportation j Division of Aviation P. 0, Box 12607 Austin, TX 78711-2607 TOGETUR Wa SUCCBBD - 6}}J) ~ !i ,I 0.` ~ilNr+t 'D F..t.,~ 0-7 Agenda Apenda lwn)._ ~ S # GRANT AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PART 1-OFFER Date of Offer: June 25, 1992 Project No, 3-48-0067-07 Airport: Denton Municipal Contract No. DOT FA 92 SW-8111 TO: CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS (herein referred to as the "Sponsor") FROM: The United States of America (acting through the Federal Aviation AdmUstration, herein referred to as the "FAA") WHEREAS, the Sponsor has submitted to the FAA a Project Application (also called an Application for Federal Assistance) sated June 24, 1992, for a grant of Federal funds for a project for development of the Denton Municipal Airport (herein called the "Airport"), together with plans and specifications for such project, which Application for Federal Assistance, as approved by the FAA is hereby incorporated herein and made a part hereof, and WHEREAS, the FAA has approved a project for development of the Airport (herein called the "Project") consisting of the following-described airport development: Overlay RW 17-35 and Rehabilitate Taxiways and Apron all as more particularly described in the property map and plans and specifications incorporated In the said Application for Federal Assistance, FAA Fwn $100.31 (1049) 4eveloDmeM of Wid Program age 1 of Pages o Jt'1 v< f j l Agenda No. ALIenja Ilan) l>310 of 9,2 aj NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to and for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of the Airpo~a Airway Improvement Act of 1982, as amended b the Airport and Airway Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1987, herein called the Act, and f or the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979, and in consideration of (a) the Sponsor's adoption and ratification of the representations and assurances contained in said Project Application and its acceptance of this Offer as hereinafter provided, and (b) the benefits to accrue to the United States and the public from the accomplishment of the Project and compliance with the assurances and conditions as herein provided, THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES, HEREBY OFFERS AND AGREES to pay, as the United States share of the allowable costs incurred in accomplishing the Project, ninety (90) percentum of all allowable project costs. This Offer is made on and subject to the following terms and conditions; Conditions 1, The maximum obligation of the United States payable under this offer shall be $810,000. 2. The allowable costs of the project shall not include any costs determined by the FAA to be ineligible for consideration as to allowability under the Act, 3, Payment of the United States share of the allowable project costs will be made pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of such regulations and procedures as the Secretary shall prescribe. Final determination of the United States share wJ1 be based upon the final audit of the total amount of allowable project costs and settlement will be made for any upward or downward adjustments to the Federal share of cosm 4. The sponsor shall carry out and complete the Project without undue delays and in accordance with the terms hereof, and such regulations and procedures as the Secretary shall prescribe, and agrees to comply with the assurances which were made part of the project application. 5. The FAA reserves the right to amend or withdraw this offer at any time prior to its acceptance by the sponsor, 6. This offer shall expire and the United States shall not be obligated to pay any part of the costs of the project unless this offer has been accepted by the sponsor on or before July 31,1992 or such subsequent date as may be prescribed in writing by the FAA, 1 PM Foam 5100 3Y (108a) DevalepMOM Of H0164 N00rem Page o 6 Pages ~r ~lnnda No. ~ -D~_ o_ 7, A The sponsor shall take all steps, including litigation if necessary, to recover~~ezf€rttt S3A fraudulently, wastefully, or in violation of Federal antitrustxPstatutes, I n any o ther_~ manner in any project upon which Federal funds have been a nded, or rrdsused 7~~y -'I' For the purposes of this grant agreement, the term "Federal funds" means funds however used or disbursed by the sponsor that were originally paid pursuant to this or any other Federal grant agreement, It shall obtain the approval of the Secretary as to any determination of the amount of the Federal share of such funds. It shall return the recovered Federal share, Including funds recovered by settlement, order orjudgement, to the Secretary, It shall furnish to the Secretary, upon request, ail documents and records pertaining to the determination of the amount of the Federal share or to any settlement, litigation, negotiation, or other efforts taken to recover such funds, All settlements or other final positions of the sponsor, in court or otherwise, involving the recovery of such Federal share shall be approved In advance by the Secretary, 8- The United States shall not be responsible or liable for damage to property or injury to persons which may arise from, or be incident to, compliance with this grant agreement, 9. Unless otherwise appruved by the FAA, the sponsor will not acquire or permit any contractor or subcontractor to acquire any steel or manufactured products produced outside the United States to be used for any project for airport dc,elopment or noise compatibility for which funds are provided under this grant. The sponsor will include in every contract a provision implementing this special condition, 10. It is mutually understood and agreed that if, during the life of the project, the FAA determines that the grant amount exceeds the expected needs of the sponsor by $5,000 or five (5110) percent whichever is greater, the grant amount can be unilaterally reduced by letter from the FAA advising of the budget change, Conversely, if there is an overrun in the eligible project costs, FAA may increase the grant to cover the amount of overrun not to exceed the statuto fifteen (15%) percent limitation and will advise the sponsor by letter of the increase, Upon issuance of either of the aforementioned letters, the maximum obligation of the United States is adjusted to the amount specified, 11, The property map referred to on Page I of this Grant Agreement Is the Prope Ma Exhibit "A", dated September 5, 1981, attached to the Application for Federal Assistance attached to the Grant Agreement for Project No, 3-48.0067.01. 12, The plans and specifications referred to on Page 1 of this Chant Agreement are the plans and specifications approved by the FAA on May 29, 1992, fAA farm 51Qp.;7 (10-Bgl gevelopmeM or Nolse froprem age 3 o Pages r1 AlJOW fill NO, nt,enda DAO 13, The Sponsor agrees to perform the following; a,?s 1, Furnish a construction management program to f %A prior to the start of constructions which shall detail the measures and procedures to be used to comply with the quality control provisions of the construction contract, including, but not limited to, all quality control provisions' and tests required by the Federal specifications. The program shall include as a minimum; a. The name of the person representing the sponsor who has overall responsibility for contract administration for the project and the authority to take necessary actions to comply with the contract. b, Names of testing laboratories and consulting engineer firms with quality control responsibilities on the project, together with a description of the services to be provided, c. Procedures for determining that testing laboratories meet the requirements of the American Society of Testing and Material's standards on laboratory evaluation, referenced in the contract specifications (D 3666, C 1077), d. Qualifications of engineering supervision and construction inspection personnel, e. A listing of all tests required by the contract specifications, including the type and frequency of tests to be taken, the method of sampling, the applicable test standard, and the acceptance criteria of tolerances permitted for each type of test. f, Procedures for ensuring that the tests are taken in accordance with the program, that they are documented daily, that the proper corrective actions, where necessary, are undertaken, 2. Submit at completion of the project, a final test and quality control report documenting the results of all tests performed, highlighting those tests that failed or did not meet the applicable test standard. The report shall include the pay reductions applied and reasons for accepting any nut-of-tolerance material, An interim test and quality control report shall be submitted, if requested by the FAA. 3. Failure to provide a complete report as described In paragraph 2, or failure to perform such tests, shall, absent any compelling justification, result in a reduction In Federal participation for costs incurred in connection with construction of the applicable pavement. Such reduction shall be at the discretion of the FAA and will be based on the type or types of required tests not performed or not documented and will be commensurate with the proportion of applicable pavement with respect to the total pavement constructed under the grant agreement. 4, The FAA, at Its discretion, reserves the right to conduct independent tests and to reduce grant payments accordingly if such independent tests determine that sponsor test determine that sponsor test results are inaccurate, i FAA Fwm 3100.31 (1089) Development of N01ee Raorem Page 4 of 6 Pages i~ i~ ~I i Agenda No. _ ~o oZQ_ Agendalt,m NO L--ter 5 14, Buy American Requirement, Unless otherwise approved by the FAA, it will not are or permit any contractor or subcontractor to acquiro any steel or manufactured products produced outside the United States to be used for any project for airport development or noise compatibility for which funds are provided under this grant. The sponsor will include in every contract a provision implementing this special condition, The Sponsor's acceptance of this Offer and ratification and adoption of the Project Application incorporated herein shall be evidenced by execution of this instrument by the Sponsor, as hereinafter provided, and this Offer and Acceptance shall comprise a Grant Agreement, as provided by the Act, constituting the contractual obligations and rights of the United States and the Sponsor with respect to the accomplishment of the Project and compliance with the assurances and conditions as provided herein. Such Grant Agreement shall become effective upon the Sponsor's acceptance of this Offer, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION W Assistant Manager, AIp9rts Division Part Il - Acceptance The Sponsor does hereby ratify and adopt all assurances, statements, representations, warranties, covenants, and agreements contained in the Project Application and incorporated materials referred to in the foregoing Offer and does hereby accept this Offer and by such acceptance agrees to comply with all of the terms and conditions in this Offer and in the Project Application. Executed this day of , 19- CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS (Name of Sponsor) By. (SEAL) Title; Attest; Titles P- Form 5100 at (10-89) oewiopmeM at Hake Proprem Page 7516 Pages Si:YLIJ{ I[.. 1YT. i ,tl _ 9a - oao A{tenda No. A{londa 114rn__~~~~ I Nto ~.2 CERTIFICATE OF SPONSOR'S ATTORNEY acting as Attorney for the Sponsor do hereby certify; 'T'hat in my opinion the Sponsor is empowered to enter into the foregoing Grant Agreement under the laws of the State of Texas. Further, I have examined the foregoing Grant Agreement and the actions taken by said Sponsor relating thereto, and find that the acceptance thereof by said Sponsor and Sponsor's official representative has been duly authorized and that the execution thereof is in all respects due and proper and in accordance with the laws of the said State and the Act. In addition, for grants involving projects to be carried out on property not owned by the Sponsor, there are no legal impediments that will prevent full performance by the Sponsor. Further, it is my opinion that the said Grant Agreement constitutes a legal and binding obligation of the Sponsor in accordance with the terms thereof. Dated at this day of , 19_. ey i I i i i E i AM Form 01031 r10-0 D04100MW of Nolfd ROWOM Page of 6 ages 3 APPLICATION FOR owAa.eaiMo ISO 404) M. YL{WrRTaO yMy,y FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 4ivvL NM OF NewswK a a+n ~aawr~o N ~n wM ApOMC.4/I r.+u« . nw ~ Iw'°°A"N°" A 2"dB IIEii11^ S 'A`' _ < ej f 13 COMWi MM a Ull 06MMMO of PRUKU 4400 r.A~M WnM+r Ka o.w-bvt , w Djlo 2 2~y~- _ M. ArtueunwroAwnafr ty"of Denton Airport ANMM M'M. Mw M, MMIa and ar W*) ~ ~&W " w of No worn % to .omod ri ~n wwwv 5000 Airport Road Joe Thom OW m:. it Box 100 Denton, Texas 76205 (817) 383-7702 7 5 6 0 0 0 5 1 4 A ear K MidUridt+M a#" ow. 6warl l am cofts d Vim~ M lyw L" G MirdtrM A wMw 1MMwMM a a NMNMAAaM 0. T06M14 it boo TOM ® "o` p Orr.~ O >irar«+ F. wwwwooo Y ~onk awrnwA M R*A"% ~ spowbu loop M m**. ❑ © 4 IN" whit, M 06w too 1. 42,111 A Now ANN I Dwtltt ANN Q MOM **go" 0. W~ Momw Orin Awu*k 76;M, MAtlt a MAl440ft Federal Aviation Administration to . sM 2 0 • 1 0 6 aew.nwr neu a wRr+n~a rMOxet overlay and mark Runway 17/35; TMLAirport Improvement Program Rehabilitat6 and mark taxiway and apron w AMIM AMMM IV ONUM lava SPAW MN*& 04k Denton City and County $w ow &am Dw A Aw+uM Food 08/01/92 10/15/92 26 I 26 is WMMU MOM* WAS MAN a VAT$ 0100" 01M t"" PM1MM M PM AMSvIW ONTO a 1 810,000 N! M. 000019" / 90,000 oATI MALI I 9 a IMMr . 1 ~ 1 M10 C3 MooopuM s Man WAM IN LO. MIS • aArr 1 M (3 00 O MAMiY KA/ MOT NO IILt4TI0 M MRATI POP' MMW 1. M/Iw MMIMMa 1 A$ /t. M M A/KliAMf MaAMMI~R am so MMU► mom ,p wM r '1rA~ Ma1MM►~ a Mkt O w 900,000 K M MN a w MAIIMIN>!MM Aar IaLIM W ML w IIM1,4wraMlfOwIMM~N0An011 W MMIR w A~MMI0T,1M1 tOMMIMM+R MW 1 11 AW AM MMON M1MI lI #VM MM OW M M A/MUM. W AM TMI AMMJ W W" OIMM V W" IM ARAB IMIIMAIMC*M Y 1M Awt fAMOf M AttaMtl A.1rMMMia~ tiwiMM aTyM~wl~iM MA~lMM01/ia to Erport Manager 817 383-71D2, J 1n i OMM Idrnd a IrrwM AiAMiW/ ` 06/24/92 MK/Md M ow Gc.W A, 10) Auo* t td for Local RlprodueU00 1 t: S Agenda hlo, ` 'QaD OEPARTIAENT OF TRANSPORTATION • IEOERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Agonda lrtnt.A0,s 0#34 so-.wu~ RtIO NO, PART II PROJECT APPROVAL INFORMATION SECTION A Item I. Does this assistance request require State, local, Name of Governing Body regional, or other priority rating? Priority Rating Yes X No Item 2, Does this assistance request require State, or local Name of Agency or advisory, educational or health clearances? Board Yes X No (Attach Documentation) Item 3. Does this assistance request require clearinghouse review (Attach Comments) In accordance with OMB Circular A•95? X Yet No j NCI'COG Item 4, Does this assistance request require State, local, Nome of Approving Agency - - regional or other planning approval? Date Yes X No Item Sr Is the proposed project covered by an approved Check one. State M comprehensive plan? Local Cl Regional r] Yes X No Location of plan Item d. Will the assistance requested serve a Federal Nome of Federal Installation installallon? Yet X No Federal Population benefiting from Project Item 7. Will the assistance requested be on Federal fund Name of Federal Installation ~ or installation? Location of Federal Land Yet X No Percent of Protect Item 0. I Will the assistance requested have on impact or offset See Instruction for additional Information to be an the environment? X provided. Yes No Item 9. Number of; Will the ossistonce requested cause the displacement of Individuals individuals families, businesses, or forms? Families Business$$ Yes X No Forms Item 10, is there ether related Federel assistance an this Sea Instructions for additional Information to be protect prevlout, pending, or anilelpoted? provided. Yes X No IAA fens $100.100 I6-70 SUPEnotOSS IAA fOnM 6100•I0 PAO[t I TNRU T Page 2 I YA''I Y.i CSI 1J Il ' i it Agenda 4Wrn,_n s'1~4L- ONG, p~ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION + FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 0IMS NO. 04 A 209 l PART 11 • SECTION C (SECTION 8 OMITTED) (((!(///,JJJJJ~ The Sponsor hereby represents and certifies as follows: 1, Compatible Land Use.-The Sponsor has taken the following actions to assure compatible usage of land adjacent to or In the vicinity of the airport: 1, Airport Height/Zoning ordinances 2. Noise Compatibility and Compatibility Land Use Plans ' 3. City Annexation Programs 4, Commercial Zoning Around Airport 2, Defaults,-The Sponsor is not in default on any obligation to the United States or any agency of the United States Govern. merit relative to the development, operation, or maintenance of any airport, except as stated herewith: raa~ ' Ponible Disabilities,-There ate no facts or circumstances (including the existence of effective or proposed Item. use agreements or other legal Instruments affecting use of the Airport or the existence of pending litigation or other legal proceedings) in resionable dons of Part V of thbbAppliwml t make tI eithertby limiting Its legal or financial bill y oout and r otherwlit,extceptta efa owe or carry out the lov ~ NOW , 4: Land,-(s) The Sponsor holds the following properly Interest in the following areas of land' which are to be developed or used as part of or in eomatlon with the Airport, subject to the following exceptions, encumbrances, and adverse interest, all of which arw are Identified on theAmrsaamillasij property mapdesignated as Exhibit "A" Attached to the Application for Federal Assistance attached to the Grant Agreement for Project No. 3-48-0067-01. Fee Simple Titles Parcels 1r2r3r4p5r6rC and D te y n a yproperty Gltenas its s.eA erea -tdont, i afwaa Of lfand~need only berIdenriflMd bets by the of f s awry kind d aRature, lnctudlsr~ fNns, easen►anls, teaer, ate, , T` aria number* shown on the property ntap. Page 3a FAA Form 51W1OO 14.76) IH3t4e k[f~ Y '0 6 Agenda Itom_iels 3 /7 [Me OMp,NQ. b4}r DEPARTMENT IF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ~y ('d//(~/{ of PART 11 • SFCTION C (Continued) The Sponsor further certifies that the above is based on a title examination by a qualified attorney or title company and that such attorney of title compiny has determined that tht Sponsor holds the above property Interests, (b) The Sponsor will acquire within a reasonable lime, but in any evert prior to the start of any construction work un 4er the hic such all of wheich a essare Identified on Intaforemenerest in ed property tress m apt deliglut d as Exhibit "A"tst tlon work is to be performed, NONE (OTn the el der etio ethe following Ping property;Interesttt in the foiloweina are" offI ind• whkh art to ble developedcor usedtas part of or In rn+ with lhelrpo%~Ilbtii ilA,>(e uPo^ completion of the project, all of which are" are identi!<ed on the aforementioned the co tr*t property mop designated NONE e except o follows an exclusive right for the conduct of any seronautleal activity at any airport owned 5. Exchmlve Rights. or controlled by the p NODE 'I terest in verse drAA1Obr list inch at" a tereils of oowy te a fkf~e+nd tow Iifur ,including f ono twme^t~l suat oic. Thefseparol cams altlend,need only be Wentifl d hereby the 7 of shown on the property Hasp. Ptga 3b FAA Pam 6100.100 o-w nA ijb' r' [I 11 DEP.ARTMlNT OF TRANSPORTATION -FED EPA L AVIATION aOJA11411I N...UN cwo NO, ro•ttou♦ f_ PART III - BUDGET INFORMATION - CONSTRUCTION SECTION A - GENERAL S 1. Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog No . . 20.106 Dala 2. Functional or Other Breakout . SECTION B - CALCULATION OF FEDERAL GRANT Use only l-w revisions -ter- Total Cast clesrillcotla: Amount Latest Appcoyed Adjustment Requited Amunt or 1. Adninislrationexpense $40000 S $4,000 2. Prof inlinary expense _ 1 , 000 1 , 000 _ 3. Laoiilstruclures, right-of-way 4, Architectural engineering basic lees 65,000 65,000 5. Other archileclural engineering fees 6. Project inspection lees 46 r 000 46,000 7. Land developirat 8. Reiocatlon Expenses 9. Relmhan payments to wividwls and Businesses 10. Demolition and reaaval 11. construction and project improvement 784,000 784 x000 12. Equipment _ 13. Miscellaneous 14. Total (Lines 11hroh 13) 15. Estimated In" (if applicable) 16. Net Projed Amount (Line 14 minus 15) 17. Less: Ineligible Exclusions I& Ada: conic encles 19. Total Project Amt. (Excli di Raublll AIN Grants) 00, 000 900,000 20. Federal Shan tegll W of Lim 19 10, 000 8100000 21. Add Rehebilitatlon Grants Regwsted (100 t eftent) 22. Total Fedstil pill reptesled(Llnes 20 i 21) 10, 000 8100000 23. Graeleeshm 900000 900000 24. 00w slaves _ A 21 Total Poled (Gros 22, 23 L 24) 1900, 000 S $9001,000 FAA Item 3100.100 n 130 SUPRRILOms t+AA FORM Itoe •10 PAatI I TNRU 7 Page 4 vr, a-itn;. r. n a e- F~JOflnit OEPAATMENTOP TRAN"TATION • FIDEA AL AVIATION ADMIWISTRATI n c~ SECTION C - EXCLUSIONS D310 NONE ClaNfkel len 1"111$6 fw E.clrlel leer Pwlie iywfM CeMlpa'c1 PrwiUen 1 26 121 e S e b. n e. f. e Telel$ S S SECTION D - PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING NON-FEDERAL SHARE 27. GranleeShxe $90,000 a. Secuff es b. Modsates C. AppropfislionslBy Applicant) 90,000 d. Bonds e. Tax Lewes f. Non cto _ t. own (Explain) K TOTAL - Grantee $hale 90, 000 28. Other Shares a. State b. 01bef c, Total Other Shares 29. TOTAL 590,000 SEITION E - REMARKS For Program Narratives See Preawlication. PART IV PROGRAM NARRATIVE Altaeh - See Instructions FAA pem ypp.tpp (&IN 1UPERSaOES FAA FORM 6100.10 PAW I TNNU 7 Pogo 5 Agenda No, __A_::. 8a PART V Ager1da 1lom_-leS 14 ASSURANCE Dtlo A1RpORT srorlsoRS ~ 7 a A. GENERAL 1. These assurances shall be compiled with in the performance of pant ag umenu for alrport development, airport pkrtsing, and noise compatibility program pants to airport rponsom 2. 71,Ase assurima are required to be submitted as pen of the pm)ect application by sponsors requesting funds under the provisions of the Airport wed Airway Improvement An of 1982, as amended by the Airport and Airway Safety and Capacity Frpansion M o('1987, or the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1919. As used herein, The teem public agency tponwr means a public agency with control of a public-we airport; the term private sponsor owner of a pub •use airport; and the term sponsor includes public sporoons and private sponsors. 3, Upon acceptance of the pant offer by The sponar, these smursaees are Incorporated in and become part of tht gnnl agreement. B. DURAMN AND AFFIJGABUI17Y. L Airport D e r r J n p se e ri or P Csaaj 111—) F.%W Projecl6 OF 1 , W e o by s PabYc Agcy Sporar, The terms, conditiom Lad assurances; of the pant apameat shall remain is full fora and Watt throughout the useful Lite of the faciUtke developed or equipmtot aNuhed for as airport developateat or White compatibility Program project, or throughout the useful life of the project items Installed within a fecihty under a soles compatiblllty Program pr*ct• but in any event not to tweed twenty (20) years (roe the date of acceptance of a grant offer of Federal fun for or the pm*d. Hcvmr, There shalt be no Umit on the duration of the amumaee against eaduehe Mots or the terns, conditlook and assurances with respect to real property acquired with Federal Nods. Furthermore, the duration of the Civil Rights arurance Q W be as specified in the aawrame. 2 Afapad oevelopmod at fito oemillaarRey Fromm iPsojsda Unarm" by a rsit.ra spammam 7W precedlag paragraph 1 Ww appli s to a peMale aposew a" that sirs nsefuf We of peoject items Installed wlthia a (mility «the useful mii~fet d reciiltka developed or cagulpostat acquired wader an Wirporl davtbpmeet or anise aomF Mikity program project shall be no less than 10 y"m home the date of the bmeplana of Pedera1 ale for the project. 3. Alrpar PhaWair udarfahns Icy a 3psaa:. Wiest oehnwfae speeilkd in the past apeemem, oNy Aawnnae 1, 2. 3, s, 6, 13, 10, 30, 31 33 34, wed 36 is Sectlom C apply to pimWq project The torms, 00adi0000, Wad assumacm of the put "meat &IAU mmale in NO fora wed efted during the Use of the project, C SPONSOR (=2f9'BCA7M Tat sponsor hereby Worn and ceaiftat, with respe t to thh grant that L Gemad Faded RagWhassWals It WW Oompfy With all Wppikabk Federal kws, 1egak110ns, eaKWId" M44M Polkles, guldeuna mad requirem6ets r they relate to the applcacatioe, 6w7tamot and use of Federal rued' for the project Imeluding but as halted to the fofloNrt` Padad Laosimetim a. Federal Mellott Act of 1938 - 49 USG 1301, seq, b. DmrtBacoa Act • 40 USG Me),1M.I c. Federal Pak Labor Standards Act of 1936 - 29 U.S.C. ?Al,yceg. d. Hatch M • S U.S.C 01011,11M.1 r t e. Unilotn Rckaytlon AmW6noe and Real Property Ae4ulmitloa Policies at 1970.42 U.S.G 4601, ct I, Natural HWork Preaeratloa Act of 1966 • Section 106. 16 UAC 470(0.' gb Atc%wWtkel and Historic Ptnervetoa M of 1974 . 16 U.S G 469 through 469G' h. Food Disaster Proterfloa M of SM • Section 1,02(6) • 42 U S C IOlta,` 1. Rehrbiliutlon Act of 1979. 29 US.C, 791. J. CMI 11*ts Act of 1%4.71tk VI.42 U S.C. 2000d Through dJ. L Avladom Safety and Noise Abataaaest M of 1979, 49 USG 2101, Sj M. 1. Are Waerkahntla M of 1913 - 42 U.SC. 6101, _ AN. ma. Axhiwdvr t Barriers M o(1964-42 U.S.C 4131, cl tom' n. Alrposl sad Arway lsspeove--- Act of I9r2, as amea w .49 US.C 2201, qM. o. Poompkm mad fadtwtrid fowl Use M of 1978 • Sectbe 403 - 2 V.S.C SW p. CAatrad Work Hawn and Safety Saadards Act • 40 VIC 327, f sN.' q, CopelaW ,1sW*kbs.^L M • 11 UAC_ 874,' r. National Faviroanwntal Pa" Act of 196Y • 42 U.S.C 4322.$A L Endangered Soeeks Act . 16 U SC 668(6}, !j _sq,' t. Singk Audit Act of 19x4 • 31 U.SC MI, it ja u, Drsi•Pree WoAplate M of 1948.4) U.S.G 702 1hrouO 706, v. Aviation Safety end Cspedty Expansion M of 1990. rwend" odor. EeecutMe Order 12372 • Inttrp trttmtatal Revkw of Federal Programs Executive Cadet 11246 • FALW PaipMrymem Opportualty' Federal a. 499 18 • Undom AdWaWntht Requiremeos (or Octants and Coopemtk Agretreens to State and Local Governments.' b. 49 CPR Part 20 • Restrktfons or LdA*ing. Airport ursAm age AoondaNO p? Uas!_-- c. 49 CFR Pan 21 • Jondiunminsim in NedenllyAuieud Programs of the Department of Trsupd4wWa.I♦?R2tLUtiat~s of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of IVA. p d. 49 CFR Part 23 • Partictpali0n by Minority Business PAterprise in Department of Transportation t nm~2`2~__~!L C, 49 CFR Part Z4 _ Uniform Relocation Aaisunce and Real Property Acquieilion Regulation for Federal and Federally ~g ,t /a S' assisted Programs.' .r' D f. 49 CPR Part 27 - Non-Discrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Receiving or Benefithns from Federal Financial Assistance.' g. 49 CFR Part 29 • Debarments Suspensions and Voluntary Exclusives. H. 49 CFR Part 310 - Denial of Public Works Contracts to Suppliers of Goods and SerAma of Countries That Deny Procurement Market Access to U.S. Contractors. i. 29 CFR Part 1 - Procedures for Predetermination of Wage Ralea.' j. 29 CFR Part 5- Contractors or Subcontractors on Public Bulking or Public Works Financed In Whole or Part by Loans or Grant$ from U.S.' it, 29 CFR Part S _ Labor Sundards Provisions. Appliabk to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction,' 1. 41 CFR Part 60 • CHfice of Federal Cootnrt Compliance PmV*ms, Equal Employment Opportunity, Department of Labor (Federai and Federally-assisted Contracting Requirements).' m. 14 CM Part 150 _ Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, omm otl/awnaeu sad BN11vt cwow a (Ofat1B) a. A 87 • Cost Prindpks Appal" I* Gnats and Contracts with State and [.cal Governments.' In. A-121 • Audits of State and Local Governments,' `lbae laws do cot apply to airport lauafttag spowors. lbws Irws do Cot a~ty toprnL u ryon sort '49 CPR Part Is and bIv® l7rsvkr Aa7 ooatabt requirements for Stoic and tool governmens receiving Federal assistance, Any nequieeaxer levied upon Stale and local governments by Ihk n utiort sad circula shall also be applicable to prime sponsors romMrag Federal assistance under the Airport said Airway Impmwment Act of 19tS2, as. amended. Specific sesunnow required to be included in sma t agreements by say of The above laws, reguWlooe of dreulLrs an Ieeor"led by reference is the grel sgeemsat 2 Rwpaalft r Asahoorgy of do Sposar. a Pa6Bt Ailey Sposmr, It has kill authority to apply for the gnat, and to finance and arty out the proposed project; that a resotutica, modoe at similar action bas bees duty adopted or paned so an official no of the opplic"I's govctwos body outhoririag the rBlog of the appilatka, Including all uaderatasdissr and awrseoa coeulbw thereto, and dlreedeg authotiodatt; the Penns Ideetlfled w the ofrkw reprreeuHw of the opponent to act In coaaecom with the application u3 to Provide suck sd lidoeal [efonsadoe as may be required. b. Frisson Spusor. It has 1*0 outtwrity to apply for the gnat and to finance and carry out the proposed pro}cct sad comply with all terms, oo"liona, and sesurseea of this , Vt agrameat. It Lh" designate a of[kW rcpresenutive and data in w^ritiu` direst sod author itt that person to file 14 pplicatios, including all understanding and amunnces coeuiaed therein; to act in commectioe with the applieatim and to provide such additloeai lofonoatlon w my be required. 3 Sparasor lasd AwrWiYy, It law suf[kieat roods svaitabk for that portion of the projod oos% which an not to be paid by the United States. It has sufficient funds available to secure openNoe red mdnteaaave of Items funded under the grant a"mcol which it will owe or control, 4. Good Tide• L. II holds goof title, satisfactory to the Secretary, to the landing area of the airport or site thereof, or will life assurance mtisfactory to the Secretory that good title will be acquired. b. For lout eorspst"IlY F -1P Projects to be 01111i out aT the property of the sponsor. It holds good title satisfactory to the Secretary to that poctioe of the Property upon which Peden[ funds will be espeeded or will 0" assurance to the Secrstory that pod tick will be obtained. T, rim R*Irt sd pnreaa a, At will sat lab or permit my active which would opersit to 6epr1ve It of ay of the rights and powers eecelury to perfom ray of sill of the teems, ooeditioes, seed sawr"cow to the scant "Meet without the writue approval of the Secrelaq, llattr(e wiith srrcperfoi tormaeremu by the sponsor. o T1rL ah ll b ye does to a mann eroaaepubk o tthe Semutrywhich would b. It will not sell, lase, eetu caber or otherwise trader or dispoic of say pert of Its title or other Interests in the Property shown os VAitibit A to thin application or, for a note ecerips bility Program Project, that portion d the PMPertY upon whkh FeAenl feeds bout been expended, for the duration of The tones, oaeditioes, seed asursnces is like Vast agreement without appnrvd by the Secretary. U the tnederee Is found by the Secretary to be eligible under the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of IM to assume the obliptlas of the grant Lgeeemest and to have The paver, authority, Ind rinanew resourew to carry out all such obligations, the eponwr shall insert in the oortlrki of document transferring or disposing d the sponsors interest, and make binding upon the trarWene, all of lbe terms, comditioa, and assursnm eceweed In Ihle gnat agreement Airport AssuromW - alt S 3'~ AgrwtJA c. For all noise compatibility program ProYits which are to be aural out by another unit of local megoNhlirent or or neon property arced by a unit of local government other than the sponsor, it will enter into an agree".rth that government, Except at otherwise specified by the Secretary, that agreement shall obligate that gavetnmeBC A) 1112 RID!'- / t temts, codillata, and assurances that would be applicable to it if it applied directly to the pM for a grant l0 uaderuke ~`'~a~✓ the noise Compatibility program project, That agreement and changes thereto must be satialanory to the Secretary. It will take $eps to enforce thin gnumtnt aplnst the local government if there it tubstantial noacomptionee with the lens of the agreement. d. For noise o"petibility program projects to be carried out on privately cared property, it will enter into " agreement with the owner of that property which includes provisions specified by the Secretary. It will take asp to enforce this agreement againat the property owner whenever there Is substantial noncornpilance with the terms of the speement. e. It the sponsor is a private spatial, it will take steps satisfactory to the Secretary to ensure that the airport will mnlinue to function sa a public-use airport In aaordance with these amuntacet for the duration of these assurwncu. f. If an arrangement Is made for naasgement and operation of the airport by any agency or person other than the sponsor or an employee of [be sponsor, the sponsor will reserve sufficient rights and authority to ensure that the airport will be operated and maintained in accordance with The Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1962 the regulations and the terms, comditlow and assurances in the grant agreement and sbW ensure that such arrangement also requires compliance, (herewith. 6 vdak led Name. The pnnfect is reasonably consistent with plats (existing at the lime of submission of this applkwlion of public agencies that are ,lutborinsd by the state in which the project is located to plan for the developmeat of The area surrounding Use appal. For nolaw compeability FrWssm projects, other than land acquisition, to be carried out oe property no owttM by the airport and over which property arm r public spay hen lead use cwhol or authority, the sponsor sW obtale from each such gewty a written deciaratim that strb army tinpports that project and the project Is reasonably cossisleol wO the agency's piuv regarding the property. 7. Cosriaemedles of hod l1m ens It has given fair coeaderation to the Interest of oommunittes In or new which the project may be located. L Cw sherd as with Lbm to making a decision to uadertake say airport development project under the Airport and Airway Improvem tti Ad of 19112, It ban undertakes moon" coesultatice s with affected pinta udeg the alrpon it which the Flood is pope" 9. Pink Fiarimga (a pro* larmMag the loratlaa of its alrrpar, an distort runway, at a major runway avteeaioe, it bps the ai~rportta ~u llootatfor pubk lem AW Its c Weacy will the opmb end obj)ocdm of such plplanni~ng ashy b rtaimetal hurt carried outbby the community. It alsalk when requeasd t y the Secretary, submit a wily of the transcript of path beaefage to the Secretary, 10. Ads cad Maces On aNty3um&w& le projects plrpon location, a major rvewey wttepoa or runway loatioe It wed pprovide for the Oovenw of the pate is which the prolm L loaned to can* in writing to the Stu-tary that The project will be looted, deaigacd, constructed, and operated goo m to oompfy with applicable air sad water quality p:aadards. In any me whoa such standards have am been approved and when applicable air and water quality pandarde bevo been promulgated by the Administrator of the Environmental Protecdoet Agieay, certification shall be obtained from a,h AdmlaWrator. Notice of certification or ref" to artily ahai! W provided within potty days after the pfdAct appil atioa ho been received by the Secreury, IL Iaeal AppromL In projects lovolvieg the ooastructloa or atemdoa of any ramway at airy geetral "tioo airport located astride a line aeparaliinmgg two counties within a Angie date, it ban reaived approval for The project from the governing body of all villages Incorporated wader the laws of that dau which an located cod" within fns mina of the ntarep boundary of the airport. 12 Teamiaal oewknposa Is sengaiphaa pot projeco which Include terminal development p a public airport, It boo, on the date of submittal of the ppar*oJecd grant appileadoe, all the safety equipment required for artil adow of such airport under Section 612 of Ute liederai Aviation Act of I"S sad W the murky equipment required by role or regulation, sad hot pravMkd for aaesa to the pameayer eapMnlag and deplaeing area of such airport to Fdox: rs eeplaniny or deplardng from ninreaft other than air carrier simmik U. Aarn ed% Spsoa, Aram, and RsamWhwo g Rgdssmarw a. If shed lap am Flood accounts and records which fully dbelae the Asmat and dispaeitioa by the Md*al of the proceeds of Me gnat tM total oosiof the project Ica on tsectlos with whkh the grant M ghtn a aced. and the amount sad nature of that portion of the cat of the project supplied by other sources, sad such Aber fla t"CW recordlt pertinent to the project. The aemu is and racads SSW be, k9pl in aaordance with ua aoo%nNag system that will Willett as effective audit in mordence with the Nqk Audi) Act of 19141. b. It alp" make available to the Secretary and the Comptnilkr (keen! d the United Stales, or my of their duly autbo&W reprutntatives, for the purpose of audit and ermslsttioa, any boots, drevmeatn, papers, and records of the recipieat 11x1 are pertinent to the pant. The Secretary may require that an appropriate audit be conducted by a reclpkmt. to any sae in which an G,dsptmdeat audit is made d The mounts of a spatial relating to the dbpositbe of the psoceedd of a V"I or relating to the project In connection with which the grant win ,-jvea or used, It shall file a anifltd ropy of such audit with the Comptroller General of the United Seat" not later than 6 months following the ekwt of the fiscal year for which the audit wan made, Airport X-myrances. ) sgr Agunda (Pin leg eQ 14 Misivennexi Ways Ranks It shall include, in all contraeu in exec" of 5ZOW for work on any projects runde¢ h"r the `tint agreement which involve labor, provisions establishing minimum rates of wag", to be predetermined by thl5cnusyct I-Albor, in accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act, es awnded (fo U.S.C 276a-276x•5), which contractors shall pay to akllkd ad 0 and unskilled labor, and such minimum rates shall be sated in the irMAlioo for bids Ind shall be included In proposals or bids for the wort. 15. Veaearas Pieferoee 11 shall include, in all contracts for wort on any projects funded under the pant agreement which involve ahor, such provisions a are necessary to ensure that, In the employuent of Labor (except in ececuttve, adminiarative, and supervisory positions), preference scull be Sven to vetcrena of the Vietnam en and disabled veterans as defined in Section 315(c)(1) and (2) of the Airport and Airway improvement Act of 1962. However, this preference shall apply only Overt the individuals are available and qualified to perform the wort to which the employment relates. 14 Coafptry An, FWss aid Speodatiost. It will execute the project subject to oar* specifications, tad schedules approved by the Secn¢tuy. Such plans, sptcifkatieot, std seheduta shall be submitted to the Secreary prior to commencement of rile preparation, cotw ucthrc, or other performtnct under this pant Mipesment, and, upon approval by the Secretary, shall be incorporated into thlt great apwmenl. Any modifications to the approved plese, specifications, And schedules shall ALSO be subject to approval by the Secretary wW inrorpotilion into the pant agreement. 17. Gaadsdlas lie pedios rd AppowL II will prwide and maintahs competent technlal supnvion At the construction site throughout the project to assure that the wort conforms with the plans, sprecincatios, and schedules approved try the Seen ,~,y for the project. It shag subject the ooatrudion work on any project rontalaed in an approved project Application to In7,:.ri;b and apprwaf by the Secretary and such work shall be in aocondan a with regulatlow and procedures prescrlbt.J by the Secretary. Such regutatioet A/W procedures shall require such cat and prop reporting by the sponsor of sponsom of curb project as the Secretary thad deem monetary. I& Pisfm ha~aca► In Carrying out ptanniag peojecttu a. it win eavoute the project in accordance with the Approved propem asrtstiw woulned in the project 4ppi"604 or with eodibcatioas dMassfy approved, b. It will furakh the SwfttM with rich periodic repots as required pertaWieg to the phuteing project nod pkAWrrg work acwtift c, It wW hcfude to Lag published material pepsu in coemoctbn with the plawd" project a nonce that the material was pepas seder a pot liwided by the Umffad States d, It will make such m ttfW Available for eatimiaatioe by the puMk, and Apes that au material prepaed with funds under this project than bt subject to copyright to the United Sates or any other country. I. it wig ow the Secretary unrestricted suthority to publish, disclae, distribute, and otherwise use any of the material prepared in ooaneetioa with thk VUL L It wig "I the Secretary the not to dkuppro a the spoaaoet employment of speeifnt conwltanr WW their subcontrsMon to do Lag or any put of tkk project a well w the tot to disapprove the proposed scope and met of professional urvktL fi It will paint the Secretory the tight to dkapproK lbe WA of the apDW&I Araploysa to do W Of soy put Of the ptojea, h. it uedentands and area that the Secretays approval of this fm~ftl pent or the Secretws app"W of say ptanmias WA14r) developed K put of this past does ink tonsgtule or uapy Any OWMAM Of oommitmeat oe Ibe part of Ibe Secretary to approw any pesNng or future application for a Ptderd airport grant, 19. Opnsios std hfsisksssoa a. It will auitaNy operate and maintain the Airport wed W facilities thereon or eosee led therewith, with due regard to diewde wed flood eosditkoas y~ MaPout to f~ close the airport for eooseroeaudW purposes must flit be Approved by the Secretary. IU 9fpoA NO all f wh" am 000000 1 to serve the aerosa4ow oem of the Airport, other this faegitim owned or amtrolhed by the United States, than be operated it Mig grow in anode And krviotable condigoo aced Is wee rdaece with the mielmum standudo as may be required or prwrribed by appllable Federal, suit, And foal a eeies rot maintenance amt operation. It will not cause ot permit any acthiy or action thereon which would interfere wish Its sae for airport purposes, In furtherance of thin assurance, the sponsor will bat In effect at all rimes arrangements for- (1) operating thn atrpon'a aeroaautkrl facillifa wherever required; (2) Promptly FrAdLieg Mind lighting hoards resulting from airport ooWltiont, tae L40S temporary COWWOK Ind (3) Promptly ootlfliag ahmea of any condition affecting oero cubes! use of the alrPM, Nothing contained herein shag be construed to require that the alryorl be operated for aeronautical use during temporary periods when Inow, flood, or other climatic condillohs Irdetftne with such opetitioa and maintenance. Purther, nothing herein shag be construed is requiring the maintenance, repels, restoration, or reptacetnent of any drttclute Of facility which 6 substaetisiy damaged or destroyed due to as act of God or other cooditloo or cirevmatanee beyond the control of the sponsor. Airport Assurance* age ii l~nl}eta {{jo. _~r~ r D a0 b. It will tunably operate and maintain nuke compstibflity program Items that it owns or evnlrokn 'eidivhic~I~Fdire ' 3.19 have been expended, Ds:0 ~ pi a s- dQ Ilasrd Itmaaosai and fioWmailams. It will take appropriate action to astute that such terminal airspace as V required to protect instrument and wuAi operations to the airport (inclueling established minimum night attitudes) will be adequately cleated and protected by renwrvb% lowering, rdomtins, marking, or lighting or otherwise miNgatnns cAstias airport haarda and by preventing the establishment or neation of future airport hamrds. ZL Colofmtble Lad the It will take appropriate action, including the Adoption of tuning laws, to the extent reasonable, to restrict the use of hod adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the airport to activities and purposes compatible with normal airport operations, ododing LoWna and takeoff of Aireruft. In addition, if the projw is for noise compatibility program impkmemtation, it will trot awe or permit any change to land use, within its jurisdiction, that will reduce the canpatibillty, with respect to the airport, of the noise compatibility program measures upon which Federal funds have ban expended, 2L Bmac'tic Noad moira.sioa a. It will make its Wrport available as an airport for pubtic•uae on fair and matonabk terns and without unjust diactiminatbe, to all types, kinds, and elves of Aeronautical urn. b. In any mgmement, contract, lease or other Arrangement under which a right or prMlese at the airport Is granted to any person, f t^ or torporatioa to coedud or engage In any oemamutical acthity for furnishing services to the public at the airport, the sponsor will insert and enforce provisloa requlrinl; the eoetrador to (1) wraith amid services oe a fair, equal, and so unjust' dLeriminatay bans to all users thereof, and oooddwriimt oatory d~YCarn each r~aiieR service, olher simidar gyp that the ceastractor (Z) may be aallowedra~ make mand oask mold discriminatory reduedoess to volume pum: rm. C. Pxh fiaedbsmed operator at my Airport arced by the ryoesor shall be subject to the same cola, lets, Rmtals, and other chaps a are uelfora+fy mppticabk to Ad other fisod-bmsrd oporotors mokirg the same or AmW ova of auh alrpon u, utiliehg the some or dmilar fochitiem. d, Bad mfr carrier WWS much airport "haw the right to service Itself or to use hey fisedbaad operator that IS asthorfined or permitted by the Airport to serve any aL carrier at much airport. e. Each Air arrkr°tr1sC tsfrpod (whether as A tenses, aaleeaat, or swbeceaot of aaolber de ardef ueonl) shot! be subject to mueh wMLe 1ory and ev"maitWy comparable rules, rtrukdor, eoedltioas, rats, fees, Meta* std other chutes will, respect to ("ties dlrtcty mad wbetaedany related to pro" q ~ lion w are oppt'abk to sal such air orders which make NOllar use of such airport and which utltlae Nmik i f ~ status as to reatocomew c. fiotioae smeh a tenses or eoeteaaehr asset Nseatoq carriers mad eowrlipu cry tesanl or dpawfy &W nod be unrewrtnably withheld by my airport prwided so air carrier assume obligations wbaanridy rimiiar to those aheady impowd on air saints in rich clamodficaticria or sutw. f. it will mod esercito or peer any right or privilege which operates to prevent any person, firm, of corporal) but not opersl United Aircraft on the airport from pedormhts any wrvka on its on &Uaikh with its own emp"a (bdudims to "otenaooe, rtpair, tad fueling) that it may choose to perform. S In the evmat the spoew Nag eserciwa any of the runts And privikta rr~t~ tom rancorort or em Irrvol"w will be provided on the same medltkes All would V* to the furnishing by of the sponsor under theme peovisloft b. The spoetor say eaubLiA such fair, equal, And not unjuaty discrlmissotory coeditlma to be met by ail Leis of the Airport as may be nearmry for the Ask add effitiemr Opt Mellon of the airpom i. The oporaor say prohibit of limit any Siva type, tied, or class of aememuliat use of the air" If such action Is not awry (of the Ask operation of the Airport or neewrafy to All the CWH "ON needs of the pubik. ri t?adeshe l Rama It wilt permit a ern salve right fa the use of the Airport SAY persona providing, of isteodies to pqtoovvilddiss, we dew servka to the public For pwq-'sea of this the ptwWW a "Mots at mn airport by a ainsk ftsed.baoed oporaw &W am be coemlrve l as an exctuAve right both of the fotlowdms apply a. it would be uareeso Baby eatly, burdurorne, or impractical for more than one flud•bwad operator to provide such services, tad b. If Allowing mean than ow feed based operewt to provide such services womk require the reduction of space leased pummesl to an emiatktg asreetwal berweea much Nagle fisedbaaed operator Amid such airport. It further spew that it will not, either diredy or iodirady, grant of permail any person, firm or ODVMtloss this exclusive advertising am shl at the Airport, of At Any Other Airport now owned or controlled by it, to conduct Any merueoutial cwttia, u Wudins, ri but not limited to ciuriet flightwsrip1w trslnhtg, aircraft MOW And nghtseelnsak of g, atria+l+~ogrsphy, trop dusting, lion petroicurnProducl1wisethtfor not conducted (aoonjunct with other Wroautkal activity, M*reanWmalatenance of alleyth, sale alrttah parts, and any other activities which beauty of their direcl MIAtloahip to the operatbe of Aircraft an be regarded w w mtromutial activity eduins At such ore Airport before T, MW mIMI y It eta the AJ~ AW At wayy o Improvement Ad o 0( 1942 he grant A rpod uranra age u AponddPlo Aqerlda Inm_~.~ la. Ike and PeaW Stfucturc. II Will maintain a fee and rental strunufe consistent with Assurances 221}} 23, for the faciftiea2-.7 ~a..- and services being provided the airport users which will make the airport as sep4ustainfng as poulbk ufff fIFd circumstances existing at that particular airpon, taking Into actount such factors as the volume of traffic and emoadmy collectkm. No part of the Federal share of an airport development, airport planning, or note compatibility project for which a grant is made under the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1482, the Pedersl Airport Act or the Airport and Aimay Uevek"ot Act of 1970 shall be included in the rote base in establishing fees, rates, and charges for users of that airport, 25. A taxes on lrprxt aRetviii It viation fueltesub air u 'port a undi t e control f a publi bage agency, MI ~ t for generated the capital? r the airport and any local airport; the local al operating cola he the airport system; or after lost facilities which are owners or operated by the corer or operator ot the airport and directly and substantially related to the actual air Irarlaporui0oa of passengers or property, or for noise milirlion purposes on or off the airport. Provided, however, that if covenants or assurances In debt obligations Issued befor. September 3, 1982, by the owner or operator of the airport, or provisions eructed before September 3, 141&2, In governing statutes controlling the owner or operator's financing, provide for the use of the revenues from any of the airport owner or operator's fadfilla, including the airport, to support red only the airport but also the airport owner or operslor's general debt obligations of other fad Ales, then this hm lation on the use of all revenues generated by the airport (and, in the case of a public airport, bat taxes on avlallon fuel) si not apply. 270 PAporr mail Inspections. 11 will submit to the Secretary such annual or special financial and operations reports as the Secretary may reasonably request. For airport development proilecta, It wW slao nuke the airport and all airport records and documents affecting the airport, including deals, kasm operation and use agreements, regulation and other instruments, available for Inspection by any duly authorized opal of The Seem" upon reasonable request, Por noise compatibility program pia, It will Wo mate mordc and documents relating to the project rod coaNaued compliance with the terms, conditkea, and sourreces of the grant agreeattut including deeds, lea es, agreements, reLa and rAjlabk for inpectlot by any duly autboeiaed sgeaf of the Secretary upon ressonabk request. other instruments 27. Uss oEOovrassrey AinaR It wiU make available all of the facilities of the airport deekiped with Federal financial assistance and all those usable for kadling sad takeoff of aircraft to the United States for uw by Ooverameat alm"I't in common with other khcrah of all tines without cb", encept, U the use by O*vernawa! alscrsh Is sufrtantlecharge may be made for a reasonable chase. proportional to such use, for the ooat of operating aid maintaining the f "Lies; wed. Unkas otherwise determined by the Satetary, or otherwise agreed to by the sponsor, and the uYag agency, substantial use of A e airport by glovernmeol a{rtnh will be oorWdered to eWC when opemdotr of such aleemh am In excess of thou which, in the OpWm of calendar moch! t Semlary, would unduly interfere with use of the Andbag areas by other authorized sfer aft, or during any a. Five (S) or more aoverumal aircraft ate regularly based at the airport or on Land adjacent tberefo; or b, 71be toW number of movements (eouulag each leading as a mwemeet) of government aircraft is 300 or more, or the gross sceumulaiM weight of government aienah usiag the airport (the IoW movements of government almaft multiplied by gross weights of such dreral!) is La emu of rft mluloe ponds. X Land her 1!tslesal P%ck%a It wits furnish withwA cos to The Pederai Government for we In eonaectioa with any air traffic control or air navigation activities, or wsatber•reporting sad communication activities related to alt traffic toelyd, any areas of load or water, or estate therein, or rights In boll4lo . of the sponsot r The Secretary coft"m necessary or dedrable for caeatnscffon, operation, and mslnkaance at Pederai expense of epaee or fatuld" for such purposes. Such areas or any portion thereon will be made available as provided hertin within four moeths after recei of A written request from the Secretary. W 29 Ali" Layout Plan, a. It will keep up to date at all times as airport layout plan of the airport showing (1) boundarks of The airport sad W proposed additions tbercl% together with the boundaries of all of le area owned or controlled by The Vow" for airport purposes and proposed addifim thereto; (2) the loathe and nature of all exletieg sad proposed airport facilities and as"xio es (such so mnwaya, Wiways, aprons, termite{ building~ 1=m seed msdn~ Including all proposed extendon and redwtdoes of existing airport f"fles; and (3) the io OW of so exktlng and proposed norwiatdat situ red of all elating improvements therson. Such Airport Layout plan seed each neeadmeat, revision, of modl1100" therreof, be subject to the approval of the Secretary which approval shall be evideesad by the aiOssture of a duly nproeeutive of the Seemtary on the fax of 1be airport Layout plan. The sponsor will not make or emit Any changes or aihmlioes In the airport or in any of its facilities which are not In ooafor wily th the Al" Layout plan approved by the Seemary red which might, in The opinion of the Secretary, adveraey affect the safely, utwq, or Oncy of am alfietterit. b. If a ehuye or Wilaredon in the air " or is fscilltks is etude which the Secretary determLsen Wveney fiNwes the safety, utwty, or efficknry d any Fe&" owed, leased, or funded property oo or off the &I" And which lance ilk conformily with the airport layout plan a approved by The Secretary, The owner or operslor will, if requested by The Sot etary (1) elliniaAte each adwme effect In a meaner approved by the Seemtaryl or (2) bear all casa of reloatlag such property (of replacement thereof) to a site acceptable to ilk Secreary and all costa of restoring such property (of n~airent or c to T level' es of safety, utility, efticknry, and oust of operation wising before the unapproved change Airport minty age 6 lkm_~5"A 30. G+1 Rights. Agenda It will r sty with such rules as are promulgated to assure that no person shall, on the pounds of race, creed, color, national origin age, or handicap be exctuded from participating in any activity condoned till t, n, .t-_ - - 7'y 9 2 funds noshed front t ant. Thu assurance obliptes the sponsor for the period during which Federal financial sasistance .3 a 5 is extended to the I r, except where Federal financial assistance is to provide, or is in the form of personal proprrty or real property or anti.:. therctit or structum or improvements Ibetm, in which use the aswnace obllplea the rponor or any transteme for the longer of the following periods (a) the period during which the propeRy is wed tot a purpose for which Federal finswial ssistauoe is extended, or for amber purpose imohing the provision of similar services or benefits or (b) the period during which the sponsor retains ownership or possession d the property, 3L D4tosal of List a. For land purchsted under a grant for airport raise compatibility purposes, it will, when the land is no longer waded for such purposes, dispose of such land at fair market value at the esrskn practicable tine. 71hat portion of the proceeds of such disposition which is p bole to the Unlled States share of the cost acquisition of such land will, at the discretion of the Secretary, (1) be fAld to the Secretary for deposit to the Trust Fund or (2) be reinvested In an approved noise compatibility project a preso~nbed by the Secretary. b. (1) For land purchased under a gent for airport dmiopmeol (other than noise compatibility) purposes, it will, when the Lend is no longer nerved for airport purposes, dispose of such land at fair market value or make available to the Secretary an amount tquai to the Ualled Seta proportionate stare of the fair market value of the land. That pouWbf of OK of s proceeds woif such ill, disposition whlich is pt~Sar~te to the United States share of the east M coq ( upon application, to Secretary, be mimvted in camber eligible airport improvement prolied or pro* approved by the Secretary at that airport or within the national airport system, or (b) be paid to The Sonetary for deposit in the Trust Fund If no Path eligible project edial (2) l.1ad shelf be comaiderod to be needed for airport purposes under thin amursoes if (a) It may be [seeded for seronewtkal purposes (todedling runway, pmesilom wee) or urns an noise buill laod, and (b) the revenue from interim uses of Posh land contributes to the fins" ask 4WIliiefesey of the airport. Further, land purchred with a grant revered by an Wrport operator or owner before Deasbrr 31, 1981, wid be eoeddtred to be Deeded for airport Poderal pas a owner re of m raise or the of Poch land, ~ such paw before December 1, IW7, was wdfred by the opersim abject to sueh we, and the land oontinva to be wed for the purpose, ranch ass having waraewaid not later theca December IS, 19". e Disposition of mach land under (a) or (b) will be strbject to the munition or reservatloa air say interest or right therein nwasary to ewre the sorb land will only be used for porposa which am oompat ible with noise levels sasoeiaed with the operadon of the WrporL 32. h3aglraslag era Dsallga 9+nims It wig award each cm tract, or subcontract for proem an"Wo emt, construction management, plarnhrg studiees, feas"Ity studies, archhe Wrai snvkes, psehaWrary, esiod"VMs, dielgw, engnering, surveying mapping, or related servka with rayed to the project in the came muner an a wairm for archisectud and engineering services Is wVAWtad order Mike IX of the Fa6trsd Property and Administrative Services Act of 1%9 at so egWvakat cimliificitioewbaaed regWreaseol prescribed for or by the spomor at the airport, 33. Pessip hYAot Rant ielka It will not allow funds provided under Ihfs pVaanat to be used to fund sey project which taw any product or service of a foreign omntry dud% the period is which each foeelp country Is Lured by the Untied Stales Trade Representative as decrying felt and egvkabk market opportualties for pnsdwis and suppliers of the United States in prmunmeat and oorwrractioa, 31. Pbbdm 9lasdsis, and 9PerddtaYom It will carry out the project In accords" with pOlcks, standards, and specification rpp~ Pnoliacts, daledu List / ry311,buIWA &so WWtW 10 W The 606M U ibis pram, wad is alocad vthe ~ArnoappUmFAA Advisory Circulam bit sets polkkil, aaadardt &W spedfratior apposed by the Secretary. 3S. Rdmosti am and Rd Property Ar¢Waa (1) It will be guided in aoqulring Beal property, to the Brea" extent pmdkbbk under State Law, by the {tad agWxWm in Sbpar B of ~9 CpR Part 24 =try, pay of rdrbum property owners for asoeaary espcmw r specifW In Su~ & (2)" it wW provide a reloeatiaa taaWlism program o/feeleg the services described it Subpar C and fair and reason" reioestioa pryme ils sad asslpande to dleplawd peeves a required In Subparts D and a3 d 49 CFR Pan 24. (3)1t wW make available witbY a reasonable period of time prior W dlaplacamsnt comil h 1, nplaaeent dweltlrys to displaced peraoea in anordsom with Subpart Rot 49 CFR Pan 24. 366 De*Fsse Wadipdaea It will provide a dry-free worWAm at the slid of wort godfled is the Vaal tppiiatim In toemdaneo wkh 49 CPR Pat 29 by (1) prblishleg a statement aotifyltig Its emplo~ee~ that the unkwful aumufature, dtttnbtetlon, QYpenslry, poremba or use of a controlled srrt:sace Y prop ad 1a the sponsols wortplem and sp~eifying the action that wW be Went sgaiast its employees for violttlon of music proWrlon: (2 aRabitshirg a deug.hee awareness program to anfom Ira empkrym abo it the danger ofd abuse In the woxkplaa and say available drug couaseft relubUltalloo, and employees assistance programs: (3) not ff ying the PAAwithin tea days Cher rceeMng notke of to employee rrlminal drug statute toavictioe for a vloislion oorurrieg to the wvrtplsee, sad (4) 11Yklm4 Al good talth effort to maiaWa a drug4reo workplace. Airport uran00s age hpcnda No. __~_D?A 3- ' 3f1 CURRPM' FAA ADVISORY QRCUTARS FOR AIP PROJBC[5 AgettCfa 11 cm IrJfedirm Date February 26. 1942 [ ll0 - NlJNWA SUBMcir ` ~a 5 70/746416 Oborution Marking and Lighting 150/5104146 Architectural, PniprAtring, and Planning Conaultsnt Services for Airport Grant Projects CH O I 150/5200630 Airport Winter Safety and Operations CHO I A 2 I30/5210.5B Painting, Marking and Lighting of Vehicles Used on an Airport 150/5210.76 Aircraft Piro and Rescue Communiatiens !50/3210.14 Airport Fire and Rescue Penwnnel Protective Clothing 150/5210.13 Airport Rescue and Fireflghring Station Bulking Design 130/5220dA Water Supply Systems for Aimrsh Fox and Itt" Protectloa 150/5220.10 Guide Spacilkation for Water/Foam Type Aircraft Fire and Rescue Trucks 0110 1 A 2 130/3220.11 Airport Snowblower Speak shoe Guide 130/5 224 1 2 Airport Sooweweeper Specifcation Guide 130/5220.13A Runway Surfam Condition Sensor Speciflcatloo Ouke 130/5220-14A Airport Fine and Rescue Vehicle Specification Duke 150/522413 Standings for Storage and MxJnlenaaes of Airport Snow Remeril and la Control Equipmeav A Guide 130/5220.16 Automated Weather Obse" Systems for Moa•Podenl Apylkat Dos 130/522417 Design StaD,;w* for AlmnA Rescue Firefighting Training Pa ' itks 150/530413 Airport Dslp 10ISMSO Airport Ominw 150/5320-6C Airport Pavement Design tad Eraluntbn CHO 1 A 2 150/S32412A Measurement, Cocaavctioa, and Malateeanm of Skid Resistant Airport Pavement Surfaces 150/5324N Airport Lasdaeaply for Noise Control hrpoaaa 0//3W-4A Runway kaph Requirements for Airport Design 130/5301F Marking of Pared Areas as Airports 150/534440 lastallatice Details for Runway Ceatertine Touchdown Zone Lighting Systems CHOI&2 0/0534438 Segmented Circle Airport Muter System 10/5314148 &ooom y, Approach L*dq Aids CHCIA2 10/33104178 Standby Power for Noe-FAA Airport !.lilting Systems 10/5314180 Standards for Airport Sip Systems LSO/331419 Taxiway Centerlime Ught* System 150/531421 Airport MhwIlascots IJgl dq Visual Alds 1$0/5314238 SupplemenW Wind Comes 1000/0334424 Runway and Tasway FAV L40ting System I30/534427A Alr•Tobrousd Radio Comm d Airport Lighting Systems t0/534S.3D SpecUicsom for L421 hoels for Remote Control of Airport Ughting 10/5345-SA Circuit Selector Switch ISO/3345.7D Specification for L424 Underground Electrical Cable for Airport Lighting Circuits 150/sus-106 Specification for Constant Regulators Rap lator Monitor ISO S34S.12C Spodficatice for Heliport Beama t0/5345.13A Spa iflattka for L411 A and wdliary IFeky Cabbw Assembly for Pilot CcmW of Airport Ughtlag Circuits ISO/5345.268 Spatifkatioas for IAA Mug and Receptacle, Cable Coanacton CHOIA2 10/5343d7C Specific* n foe Wind Cana Assemblies 041043.261) Psactialos Appoint Path tWimior (PAM) Systems IM/OS345.39B FAA Specification &M Runway and Tadway CtateAiae ReoofkL*w Marken 15t1/3343-42C 8, Iii, kien for Airport LJoi Baaea, Trtwdormer Ilariags, Junction Dow and Aommorks ISO/S3043D Spadfim toe for Obstruction 1.Jttt* Equipment l0/SX$-0D Spe W"tloa for Taaiway sad Runway Sips IS0/334S-SA Ughtselghl Approki Light Structure 10/5343-46A sporulatlon for Ruewyy and T Light Fudurea 1$0/3345 47A Ur lades Trawforeaen for Zr=w"L t ring Systems 10/534349A Specificatioa L4%, Radio Control Squlpnent 13015%S.50 Spetifiatloe for Pod" Runway fJghu CH 1 C0/534131 Specifcaatioe for Discharge-Type Fleisher Equipment I30/5343-52 Oenerk VWW Ohdeslope Indicators (OVGr) mawang Design 1 0/SMO.12 Airport Sl o ping and Omphks Airport Terml>vl paNlltks at Noa•Hub Loaliooa 10/336413 Planning and DWp Guidance for Airport Terminal Facilities at Non-flub Locations 10/S3742C Operational Safety on Airports During Comtruction upon unnea (7-91) Page a 019 iT_C {'lilt I Ye+w/rt'a~ i i( ~Ier~~la PJa _~~~aZD k~Fnda Ilnm,_L~s .~J/~ CtlRRPM PM ADVISORY QRCULARS POR AP TROJBt,'13, Dita NUMBER SUBIBCr a ll,! a 130/537MB Constriction Proper and Inspealoo Report•Alrport Omni Prog in l50/537410A Standards for Specifying Comtrwtion of Airports m/3770.11 Usa d Noadeaructim Testing Device In the 0vslustion of Airport Pw.menu CHO I%/sMI2 pudty Caatrof of ConarWion for Alrpon Onnt Projects ISO/$M2 Heliport Des 130/5 90.3 Vertipm Da i i i 1 i if i i t RCITY" COUNCI] L 1« °°~a 00~ a 0 ~d0t7 Q ti 0 '-4• r0 t~*ell °0°acc~ccaao°° 4+L - J-1 LEE= r r DATE: 07/07/92 CITY COUNciL REP T +pendiNo. _ `_)dU A~c~nda lton~ _ S~ T_ TO; Mayor and Members of the City Council N10 -4;C FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager 7 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LOOP 288 CENTRE, LOTS It 2, 3 AND 41 BLOCK 1 AND A COMPREHENSIVE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS PLAN .RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval (4-0). S RY: The preliminary plat contains approximately 8.64 acres of land is located at the southwest corner of E. McKinney and Loop 288, A comprehensive pedestrian access plan is reflected on the plat. No road improvements are warranted as both streets are state highways. There is a 75 foot easement between Lots 1 through 3 and Lot 4 which contains an 18 inch sanitary sewer line and a 20 inch water line. The Texas Department of Transportation has agreed to perform all drainage improvements for this site by widening the existing barrow ditch. At the time these improvements are complete, the existing detention pond located east of the Genetics building may be eliminated. All utilities are available to this site, SACKG-~ ROUND: This property is currently zoned Planned Development No, 41.1 however, there is a rezoning request for General Retail (Conditional) zoning running concurrently with this application. In accordance with the comprehensive site plan approved for PD-41, this area has been designated for general retail type uses. On February 26, 1992, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the vacation of poop 288 Center, Lot 11 Block 1, The applicants requested the vacated plat because of the illegal subdivision of the land. On May 4, 1992, the applicants requested a variance from the subdivision anrt Land Use Regulations pertaining to curb cut locations. The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission (CTSSC) approved the curb cuts as shown on the preliminary plat, The plat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulationsl Chapter 34 of the code of ordinances, t ca City Council Format pen0a I-- July 7, 1992 lom- Page 2 Gal 3 - PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GR UPS AFFECTED: All property owners in the plat, Building Inspections and Planning Department. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Respec ull/yJsubmitted, 1/• Prepared by: oy V. Harrell City Manager K en K. F Shari rlrban Planner j App oved: Frank H. Robbins AICP Executive Director Planning and Development i i AXX00190 1 ~YirndaPJo._._902 A~enda Item_~ y NORTH /ALII(~~ PAISLEY L y~+ a,,,,,T I ~ 7 Mai o~[ II AIG KIWI "I SITE 1 6MApY OA«= ~I au DATE; 2/20102 SCALP; NONE I Ir IpNJ5 YR1 O 1 'J ~ I .IN II I f _ IJI/IAI 1" IXX IJYII't' I ..l it it ll'NIY. I r Ni Ll'lllnl'r' I'I AI o Di If - Y) YND J ni , ' Zu 1 I I I+ I l I ~ ~ ~I) iN/Ilr Illnld % I I III r..I i I )el ~ II k 1 11 r lun I II 2S I 1 1 rn ~n lw ~ra^ [ rl I I ~ --~_ltFMIW DAn r w. , I AM lN1 I 1 ; I I ~ 'I rA" II f it I1 .I,nrr ; np.r.+l L.fly l _ (5\1 IX: 1 I I m r + I ' ...IL LUl~1' 1 ?N- ` t 1 ;d ( .riM . rl I~ r,Il Sr11r - I II}\ rl r. I ' IYY~111L-fu.~X/ I a Or j SURKYOM Loop 909 Confrol „uX.ll 9 D" Al A . uwcll+T+oo , Logo And v - r. /lft{nlnD M011540NY ~ i I 1 / 1 ' IMIO YJIIw YrYI Np IIM a I Mock One 2. . AM AMYMM I I TO T/IRI r 'rrlrlra ,r.,,l „ ~ DClTY OF DIMTON •••••",Ire.. I ICMMfTY Or 3100DO o+k+ra/ IxNlalla 1 $VATE Or )WAS _ . J AoINYAlPDMO sw AGMrI Iw{I eldR $ w d dN11N1 r M11I IMVI11tS NP Not iM I II P 0 "I 100 N nIYS Jdll YlNIU11 YII 0 N, 11 IYA7 I DENIM, h Not INII'iAi MU, 111 II 4 [b'r~'e1i~Y'-•p'n )r5):.~, w`v~.+ll is , 1 `r . 0(lond,1 No, Agpida it I T.- Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes DRAr June 24, 1992 7 Page 3 Dr. Huey asked how wide the two entrances were into the service station area. Mr, Cordell responded that it was approximately 35 feet to the nearest throat on the K-7 site providing adequate space for maneuvering large vehicles. No one was present to speak in favor or in opposition to the request for rezoning. Ms. Feshari stated that staff recommends approval of Z-92.009 with the following conditions; maximum building height, 35 feet; minimum FAR for entire site, .36; curb cuts as approved by Citizen Traffic Safety Support Commission, as shown on preliminary plat of Loop 288 Centre; along the southern property line(s) of this tract, the developer(s) must comply with landscaping requirements as outlined on the staff report; a comprehensive pedestrian access plan as shown on the proposed preliminary plat of Loop 288 Centre, Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Block 1 must be complied with and allowed uses as shown on the list of permitted uses which was attached to the staff report. Chairman Holt closed the public hearing. Motion was made by Mr. Kamman, seconded by Mr. Holt, and unanimously carried ) to recommend approval of Z-92-009 with the conditions stipulated. Consider the preliminary plat and comprehensive pedestrian access plan of Loop 288 Centre, Cots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Block 1 on property located at the southwest corner of E. McKinney and Loop 288. Staff Report-, Ms. Feshari stated the preliminary plat contains approximately 8.64 acres of land and is located at the southwestern corner of E. McKinney and Loop 288. She further explained that the only difference between the preliminary plat and the zoning case is that the Genetics Center is not Included in the preliminary plat as it is already a legal subdivision. Ms. Feshari reported a comprehensive pedestrian access plan is reflected on the plat. She indicated the location of the sidewalks which go through the middle of the property Instead of going along McKinney and Loop 288. In addition, the access easement that goes along the noddle of the property stops at the bottom of the property line for continuation when the tract to the south is developed. No road improvements are warranted as both streets are state highways. There Is a 75 foot easement between Tots 1 through 3 and Lots 4 which contains as 18 inch sanitary sewer line and a 20 inch water line. The Texas Department of Transportation has as AA)rnda NO, _ 9a O.2,c) Agenda 11em,_./c SS _ ~Y_~•J""'/ 02 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes June 24, 1992 Page 4 agreed to perform all drainage improvements for this site by widening the existing barrow ditch. At the time these improvements are complete, the existing detention pond located east of the Genetics building may be eliminated. All utilities are available to the site. Ms. Feshari brought out that on February 26, 1992, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the vacation of Loop 288 Center, Lot 1, Block 1. Applicants requested this vacation because of the illegal subdivision of the land. The plat does conform to the minimum requirements of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. Recommendation, The Development Review Committee recommended approval Mr. Kamman asked about the location of the sidewalk. Mr. Salmon noted the details of the sidewalk have not been worked out. The final plat and construction plans will specify the sidewalk plans. He did indicate the sidewalk will be elevated between the driving area and the sidewalk will be a curb above that. Mr. Kamman asked if this was being done for safety reasons. Mr. Salmon replied yes. In addition, in this type of development where offices will be on one side and fast food and a service station on the other side, the sidewalk, as planned, will give office personnel a place to walk in order to use the restaurants, etc. In addition, Mr. Kamman asked if there would be breaks in the wall. Mr. Salmon agreed and Indicated the purpose of having them run down in the middle was so that the middle access could be used by everyone from within the development. The sidewalk will be used by the public as well as by those from the interior. Mr. Englebrecht asked about the sidewalk from eastern exit of McKinney Street and Loop 288. Discussion was held on the location of the sidewalk and the uses thereof. N 3 I# Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes June 24, 1992 Page 5 Mr. Salmon reported the applicant has proposed this in lieu of the standard sidewalk around the site along the roads. He added that the applicant is required to provide a certain amount of sidewalk and the city cannot require more footage than what would be required from a standard sidewalk. In response to a question by Mr. Engelbrecht on whether or not this is a variation from what has been done, and if this will be done in the future, Mr. Salmon indicated that this is being done in the Hillerest Center, The ordinance gives developers some flexibility which may be more advantageous for their development and still serve the city's purpose. Petitioner Mike Cordell, First State Bank, indicated the owners have no strong preference where the sidewalks should be located, No one was present to speak in favor or in opposition to the preliminary plat. Chairman Holt closed the public hearing. Recommendation: The Development Review Committee recommended approval of the preliminary plat of Loop 288 Centre, Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Dlock 1 and a comprehensive pedestrian access plan. Mr. Kamman moved to recommend approval of the preliminary plat of Loop 288, Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 1 and a comprehensive pedestrian access plan. The motion was seconded by Mr, Engelbrecht and passed unanimously (4-0). IV. Hold a public hearing and consider the final replat of Lots 1R and 2R, Block 1 of the Alvin and Charlotte Whaley Addition located on the northeast corner of I-35 frontage road and University Drive. Staff Report: Mr. Yost stated the site is 4.276 acres, encompassing the proposed Cracker Barrel Restaurant and the existing convenience store which is on Lot 1R to the southwest. The zoning is a mixture of General Retail and Commercial, both zonings allow the proposed use of a restaurant. The public improvements in :lude approximately 45 feet of concrete sidewalk, two fire hydrants will be installed, one i additional fire hydrant will be relocated and approximately 100 feet of storm sewer will also be required. The city services are available or planned and the replat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations; Chapter 34 of the Code of Ordinances, t tf ~t is r~ CITY CQUNCII ooooo~oooaa o ~ x f e 41 r~ !t Agenda No, ^Qa0 Agenda Ilam,,,Y Nte ---a) ORDINANCE NO, C ~Y°< P AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the purchase or necessary materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for the appropriate of funds to be used for the purchase of the materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted herein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the numbered items in the following numbered bids for materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid Proposals" attached hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids for such items: BID ITEM NUMBER NO VENDOR AMOUNT 1367 ALL COMPULAN CENTER $ 18,666.00 1377 1 JAGOE PUBLIC $ 20.50 TN 1377 2 SUNMOUNT $ 22.50 TN 1377 3 SOUTHERN ASPHALT $ .3744 GL 1377 4 KOCH MATERIALS $ .535 GL 1377 5 ELF ASPHALT $ .6232 GL 1377 6 KOCH MATERIALS $ .535 GL 1377 B KOCH MATERIALS $ .636 GL 1377 9 KOCH MATERIALS $ .635 GL 1377 10 VULCAN MATERIALS $ 19.33 TN 1377 11 VULCAN MATERIALS $ 19.33 TN 1378 ALL DALWORTH QUIKSET $ 23,920.00 1379 1 STUART IRBY $ 19,180.00 1379 213 CUMMINS $1080900.00 1380 1 GIFFORD-HILL $ 4,19 EA 1380 2,3 GIFFORD-HILL $ 56.00 TN 1380 41,516 F & G TRUCKING $ 9.58 TN 1380 4A F & G TRUCKING $ 9.48 TN 1380 7 F & G TRUCKING $ 7.68 TN 1380 8 CHEMLINE $ 64.71 CWT 1380 9 CHEMLINE $ 70.71 CWT ~R:K tt" ij it i~ /Annda No. A(1Cnda IIOnI lbl(f 4Q a 9 SECTION II. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the persons submitting the bids for such Items and agrees to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the terms, specifications, standards, quantities and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid Proposals, and related documents. SECTION III. That should the City and persons submitting approved and accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions, a peel fications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained In the Bid Proposal and related documents herein approved and accepted. SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted bids, the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and In accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1992. i BOB CASTLEBERRYj MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITC11o CITY ATTORNEY BY: lC ~ l! l Ar~r;nfla ~~0. ~.Zvc -'Q~6 DATE: JULY 7, 1942 A0enda11ein CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: ~ y Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1367 - PC COMPONENT PARTS RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid Co be awarded to the lowest bidder, mpuLan Center in the amount of $18,666.00. SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of component parts necessary for the assembiy of eleven 01) personal computers. The of sembly and maintenance will be done by the Electric Department, Communications !,ad Electronics Division. The Data Processing Advisory Board recommends approval. To maintain compatibility with the components our recommendation is based upon an all or none evaluation, BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet, Memo dated June 4, 1992 to Data Processing Advis- Board, Minutes of Data Processing Advisory Board, PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Utility Communications and Electronics Division and PC users in the City operation, FISCAL IMPACT: Funds to purchase these component parts will come from 1991-92 budget funds from the individual division acquiring a PC. Respec fully submitted: Ll yd V, ~Fl'az~rell City Manager Approved: Name: Toni D, Shaw, C,P,M, Title: Purchasing Agent TS/jh 272, DOC rtn~ta.,,y HID M 1367 (p 1 of 2) I I I I I I I I I M&A I DALLAS ICOMPULAN I UNIV. ICOMPURI7E1 ASI I TOS IMICROLANDI BID NAME PC Component Parts I PC I ICOMPUTER I I DALLAS (COMPUTER I I ! I STORES I I I SYSTEMS I I OPEN May 27, 1992 I ! I I ! I I I~i ! _I_ I I I I ! $ IQTY.1 ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR J VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR 1 VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR 1 { I I--------- I--------- I-------- I---------I--------•-1-•--------I---------I---------1 1 1 3 1386 Motherboard l $489.00 l $239.00 I $230.00 1 $358.00 1$594.45* 1 $239.00 1 $249.00 1 $285.00 1 2 1 8 1486 Motherboard 1$1489.00 1 $590.00 1 $550.00 1 $863.00 1$1048.61*1 $590.00 1 $569.00 1 $620.00 1 I IRAMI I I I I I ----I I•--------- I I 3A 1 38 I 1 MB SIMM 1 $37.00 ) $31.00 I $33.00 $39.00 1 $59.75 l $32.00 I $29.50 l $35.00 1 ! ! 1_ -----l-•-------- ---------I-•---------!--------- 1---------l------- --I---------I 3B ! 1 4 MB SIMM 1 $147.00 1 $130.00 1 $135.00 I $148.00 1 $156.90 I $125.00 $129.00 $148.00 3'. 256K SIMM 1 $412.00 I $10.00 $10.00 1 $12.00 1 $59.75 I $10.50 l $11.00 $11.25 1 f (HARD DRIVESi 1----------1--------- ---------i---------I- - -----I--------- I------------------L 4A11 1u I 120-130MB Quantum! $368.00 1 $355.00 1 $345.00 I $344.00 I N/B l NIB 1 NIB l N/B 1 I I I---------I------------------J----------I---------1---------1---------1---------I 4A21 I 120-130MB Conner ! $368.00 1 $345.00 1 $345.00 1 $357.00 1 $385.00 1 NIB 1 $349.00 1 $320.00 1 I I----- _ -------1--------_1 - _ _ _I -I---------I---•------ l---------I 4A31 I 120-130MB Maxor I $368.00 1 $355.00 $345.00 $347.00 I $406.68 I $345.00 1 $349.00 1 $328.00 I I--------- I _----1--------- I l----•----- I 4A41 I 120-130MB Westernl $368.00 1 $345.00 NIB 1 $343.98 1 NIB I NIB 1 $349.00 1 $325.00 1 j I Digital 1---------I---------1--------------------I---------I---------I---------I---------I 4911 1 1 200MB V•uantum I $661.00 1 $560.00 NIB $636.00 I NIB l NIB I NIB 1 NIB 1 1---------- {----------I---------I---------I---------l---•------I 4821 I 20CMB Conner { $621.00 1 $555.00 j $545.00 1 $576.00 I $585.34 1 $549.00 ! $569.00 1 $520.00 1 I I I------------------I---------1---------I---------•1---------f------------------1 41331 1 200MB Western 1 $621.00 1 $549.00 1 NIB 1 $596.00 1 NIB I NIB l $569.00 1 $535.00 1 ! I Digital 1---------J---------I---------I---------I---------I-- ---------------1---------} t3 4011 I 300-400MB Quantuml$1064.00 J $830.00 1 NIB 1#1236.00 1 NIB I N/13 NIB NIB iP n. 3 4C21 I 300-400MB Conner 1 $943.00 J $690.00 1 $845.00 1 NIB I NIB I N/8 1 $895.00 1 NIB I q 011 1 Micropolis SCSI 1$1363.00 1$1100.00 1 NIB 1$1165.00 1 NIB I N/B NIB NIB I V t 345MB I--------- I-------_-I--------- I--------- I--------- 1--------- 1---------1- ----1 5 ~1 S 021 1 Micropolis SCSI 1$2575.00 1$2390.00 1 NIB 1$1884.00 1 NIB 1 NIB 1 NIB I NIB l I ! 1043MB 1---------1---------1--------- 1-----•----I---------I---------- 1------- *SYSTEM (continued) PRICE gf i r E,. BID N 1367 (p 2 of 2) 1 M&A I DALLAS ICOMPULAN I UNIV. 1COMPURIZEI ASI I TOS 114ICROLA'ADI BID NAME PC Component Parts I I PC I ICOMPUTER I I DALLAS ICOMPUTER I I OPEN May 27, 1992 I I I I STORES I 1 { SYSTEMS { 1 M IQTY.1 ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR VENDOR I VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I I IDISK DRIVESi 5A J 11 1 1.44MB 3.5" I $52.00 1 $54.00 1 $48.00 1 $53.00 I NIS I $45.00 I $49.00 1 $45.00 I I I 1- -------1___------I---------I---••-----I---------I---------- 1---------I---------I 5B 111 I 1.2MB 5.25" 1 $52.00 I $55.00 I $54.00 I $53.00 I $62.46 1 $49.00 1 $49.00 1 $48.00 1 I IMONITORSi J--------- I I I I I I I I 6A 110 1 1411 Color SVGA 1 $295.00 I $270.00 1 $285.00 1 $295.00 1 $298,10 1 $269.00 1 $265.00 1 $274.00 I I I 1---------1--------•-I---------I- I I I ---------I 60 1 1 1 201, color SVGA 1$1806.00 1$1550.00 1$1495.00 1$1738.00 1$2345.33 1$1575.00 1$1675.00 1 $989.00 1 7 111 (Keyboard I $25.00 I $26,00 1 $23.00 1 $32.95 1 NIS 1 $27.00 1 $22.00 I $20.00 1 1 I---------I---------I-••-------I---------I---------I-------••-I--------- 1..----_--_I 8 1 11 IMouse 1 $25,00 1 $13.00 I $18.00 I $12.94 1 $10.26 1 $13.00 I $13.50 1 $19.00 I 1 (MULTI I/O / VIDEO..i1---------I--------- 1-- I---------1--------- 1---------I_ -------1---------1 9A 1 11 J AT Multi I/O 1 $22.00 J $20.00 1 $23.00 1 $28.00 I NIS $13.00 I $22.50 1 $14,00 1 I I I---------- 1--------- I----------I---------I------_---I--------- 1_-•------- 1--_------I a°1M 9B 111 I 512K VideoRAM VOA1 $68.00 1 $49.00 1 $46.00 1 $65.94 1 $65.76 1 $67.00 1 $69.00 1 $53.00 1 l I I------ I---------1---------I--....-----I---------I---------•I---------J---------1 9C J I 1MB card 16bit 1 $81.00 I $79.00 1 $70,00 1 $94,98 1 $156,69 I $76.00 1 $109.00 I $103.00 1 I I I---------I----------I------------------1---------I- --_----I---------I- -------I 9D 1 I 1MB card 32bi'- I $112.00 I $150,00 1 $150.00 { NIS 1 NIB 1 NIB 1 NIS 1 NIS 1 I I I___ ------•---I--------- 1----------I--------- 1---------1 9E I I iMB card 32bit S31 $125.00 $320.00 1 $275,00 I NIB J NIB I NIB I NIB I NIB 1 (CASE/POWER SUPPLYr J---------- 1_____-___I_____-__-I._________I______-__I--------- 1---------1 10A1 11 1 Mini Tower 1 $76.00 1 $59.00 I $60,00 1 $221.00 I NIS 1 $54.00 1 $59.00 I $59.00 1 10PI I Full Tower 1 $75,00 1 $130.00 $126,00 1 $221.00 1 NIS I $103.00 1 $115.00 1 $119.00 I _-_-----,_I____- ---1 lOC1 I AT Style I $76.00 1 $61.00 1 $60.00 I $134.00 1 NIS 1 $64,00 1 $69.00 { $60,00 I ISOFTWARSt I..-_-_----I--------- I--------- I--------- I--------- I---------- I--------- I-________f ro ; 11A1 11 1 DOS 5.0 $46,00 $35.00 1 $45.00 1 $39.00 1 NIB 1 $36.00 1 $39,00 I $46.00 I v a I---------- I---------- I--•-•------I--------- " 11B 11 Windows 3.1 1 1 I J $58,00 1 $40.00 I $45.00 1 $45.00 1 $98.97 1 $42.00 1 $45.00 1 $45,00 00 1 I ITAPE DRIVEi I--------- J--------- I I I I I 12AI 60/120MB 1 $209.00 1 $220.00 1 $190.00 1 $194.50 I $223.89 1 $195,00 1 $209.00 1 $186.0 a 1----------I--------•-I---------1-_ 12BI I 120/250MB 1 $895.00 1 $280.00 1 $275.00 1 $258.50 J $276.68 I $265,00 I $269.00 1 $242.0 i y~ R t=1~ nlondd No ella -a o?o_._ Ater; l"i;7 la 1, =S ° ,-h'.... CITY of DENTON., 'PEXAS 216 E, McKlnney/ Denton, TX 78201 / Phone (817) 666.8230 MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES DATE: July 1, 1992 TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager FROM: R. E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities RE: Purchase of PC Components One of the responsibilities of the Electric Department's Communication Division is the maintenanco, renovation and, occasionally, the assembly, of the electronic control and computer systems for the Electric Department's "Systom Control and Data Acquisition" (SCADA) equipment, Asa result, we have three or four technicians who are very knowledgeable about the makeup of computer systems, As a result of this expertise and with the goal of saving the city money, this crew requested authorization to build a PC at a cost of about $1800 and teat it in comparison to a $6000$8000 IBM PC unit, Authorization was given, and the PC unit was built, tested and performed very well. It has a 486 main processor, 108 megabytes hard disk, an 8 megabyte RAM and operates at 33 mhz. Subsequently, the Electric Department built throe additional PC's for throe Gonoral Government Departments who were In dire need of PC's, Finance's budget group, Personnel (for the oporatilnn of the Mercer Pay Plan), and Purchasing, These units have also performed exceptionally well over the past three months. When the 1992 PC Purchase Package came up, the Utility Department Communications Division offered to bid on the PC units, Bids requested were "Type I", a 486 machine and "Type 1I11, a 386 machine. Bids came in on the Type I (486) machine with IBM bidding $7,287 per unit, a total of $80,157, while the Utility Department Communications Division bid was $1,988 per unit (11 units needed), or a total of $21,868 for a total sa-Angs to the Ity of $581289. The second lowest bidder was Universal Computer Storo for $1,903 per unit; however, that machine was not comparable and the Purchasing Department threw out the bid; below that was Gateway 2000 at $2,195 per machine. For the Type II (380) machine, the highest bidder was Dell Computer Corporation at $2,867 per machine, socond was the IBM bid at $2,634 per machine, and the Utility Department Communications Division bid was $1,423 for the same machine. DEDICATED TO QUALITY SERVICE 7 ~a 9 Purchase of PC Components Page 2 The Communications Division bid includes all costs for parts, labor, overhead, eta. Through the contacts the Division has with electronic component vendors because of the SCADA system and electronic communication system repair work, the Communications Division is able to buy top quality computer components at very good wholesale prices. The labor to assemble the units is minimal (3-4 hours), since all parts are modular components. The Utility Department would like to provide the PC requirements for the organization on a trial basla for this year and are curtain this division can continue to save the city money. The Division has been requested to accurately track all material, labor, overhead and warranty costs on these units to be certain that they really are providing a savings over commeroi;.ily purchasing these units. /Respectfully 1 R, E. NAlson, Executive Director Department of Utilities acs Tim Harder, Dlreotar of Electric Utilities Ray Wells, Supt., Metering/Substations/Communications file r' r! A~anrla Pia. -Q~Q_w g ~a y CITY of DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES /901 -A Texas Street / Denton, Tx 76201 M E M O R A N D U M TOi Data Processing Advisory Board FROM$ If4 Chuck Pierce, Communications a Electronics TARUs Ray D. Wells, Superintendent, Electric Metering/Communications & Electronics,/Substations DATE1 June 41 1992 SUBJECTI HID No. 13671 PC COMPONENTS/PARTS rrrrrrrrrr. wrrrwrarw r.r rrrrwr.r a~wrr.rrrrrwr.rrrwrrrrsrrrwrrwrrrrr On March 26, 19920 the City of Denton opened Bid No. 1345, for 11 personal computers of various configurations. Bid respondents were IBM, KCR Corporation, Leos international, university Computer Storeo, Gateway 2000, Dell Computers, Elasic Computer, and the City of Denton Communications & Electronics, At that time the City of Denton Communications & Electronics Division demonstrated that the they could build and maintain these computers in-house, providing a cost savings of more than $45,000 over IBM on the cost of equipment alone, In-house maintenance of these computers would also save on expensive maintenance agreements. On May 28, 1,9921 the City of Denton opened bide (Bid No, 1367) for the components necessary to build these PC's. At this time we anticipate the coat of components for the 11 personal computers requested to r~ approximately $18,666, allowing for variances in optional configurations per each user. We respectfully request approval. by the Data Processing Board for submission of Bid No. 1367, and accompanying purchase order for City Council approval. CPtpl 06042194.WP a1 ft PC COMPUTER LIST COMPUTER QTY DEPT NAME R-Q.# ACCT # 386 1 CUSTOMER SERVICE ANN BINGMAN 146897 100-040-0022-9103 486 1 UTILITY ADM SAM FLEMING 114620 810-080-0260-9229 486 1 UTILITYADM SAM FLEMING 131608 810-080-0260-9229 486 1 ELEC ENGINEERING SAM FLEMING/GLENN FISHER 114618 610-080-0266-9229 486 1 ENERGY MGMT KIERSTEN DIETERLE 116304 610-080-0267-9220 486 1 WATER PRODUCTION TIM FISHER 121193 620-081-0480-9'103 486 1 WATER DJSTR BILL BROWN 116216 820-081-0481-91 3 486 1 WASTEWATER TRTMT ASA BROWN 137660 820-082-0470-9103 486 2 COMMUNITY SVCS BILL ANGELO 116317 830-024-0800-9103 ' 386 1 COMMUNITY SVCS BILL ANGELO 116318 830-024-0801-9103 ,I r p~l ~i v~ A.votia t40...- 02 - d Apentl.1Ito III Wto CITY o/ DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES/ 901 •A Texas Street / Denton, Tx 76201 M E M 0 R A N D u m TOi Denise Sarpool, Sr. Buyer Purchasing ~f FROMt Ray D. wells, Superintendent V Electric Metering/Communications & Electronics/substations DATES June 12, 1992 SuBJECTs DATA PROCESSING BOARD APPROVAL, SID N0. 1367. , ssrrrrrsrsesrrrrrwwsssrrrarsassrrrrmasrrsrmsrssrsrsrrrsrwrrsrurs On June 11, 1992, this department appeared before the Data Processing Advisory Board, with request for approval to present Bid No. 1367 to the City Council. After thorough discussion, the D.P. Advisory Board unanimously approved our request. This department now requests that Bid No. 1367 be placed on the City Council Agenda Item on June 23, 1992, for their consideration for approval. Attached is the documentation presented to the D,P. Advisory Board. RDW t pkl. cc; R. H. Nelson, Executive Director Utilities Jim Harder, Director Electric Utilities 06122197 . WP $~1 Aoentla 41om_ J_p"''!~ ~ _ DATE: JULY 7, 1992 CITY COUNCIL RFPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID 01377 - ASPHALT, EMULSION, ROAD MATERIALS RECOMMENDATION.-, We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidders as fo11^ws: 1, Hot Mix Delivered Jagoe Public 20.60 ton 2. Cold Mix Delivered Sunmount 22.60 ton 3, ACID Liquid Asphalt Southern Asphalt 3744 gl 4. CRS-2 Asphalt Emulsion Koch Materials .838 gi 8. MRS-2 Asphalt Emulsion Elf Asphalt .8232 gl 8. MS-2 Asphalt Emulsion Koch Materials .833 gl 7. Asphalt Prime NO BID RECEIVED 8. AEP Prime Koch Materials .838 gl 9. Hot Water Dilution Kooh Materials .838 gl 10. PB-4 Proccated Aggregate Vulcan Materials 19,33 ton 11, PB-6 Precoated Aggregate Vulcan Materials 19.33 ton SUM14ARY: This bid is for asphalt emulsion materials and precoated aggregate for use-by the'Street Department, These materials will be used for mndntenance anrt special projects. Eight responses were recefvod in reply to twelve bids mailed. BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet, Memorandum from Jerry Clark. PROGRAMS, DETARTMENTS OR GROU11S AF'1~ECTED: Street Department F'ISCAL_IMPACT: Funds for this purchase will be taken from budgeted funds for Street MWlntenanoe Ma0rfals, 3 h 9i Agonrld No, l~= o?a Agenda lin~n.~s Rilo - I - CITY COUNCIL REPORT JULY 7, 1992 PAGE 2 OF 2 Respectfully submitted: Llo d Harrell city Manager Prepared by: N DenSs~ Harp L ame; Title: Senior Buyer Approved: Name: Tom'D, Shaw, C,P,M ,ntle: Purchasing Agent 298. BID ~j t Arjonrb NO, Agrmda DA CITY COUNCIL REPORT JULY 7, 1992 PAGE. 2 OF 2 Respectfully/ submitted; u Llo d Harrell City Manager Prepared by: Name: Denise Harp al 'ritlei Senior Buyer Approved: Names Tom'D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent 286.BIU . ti 1i i! { A PAOF 1 of 2 BID N 1377 I I I I 1 1 I BID NAME ASPHALTiEMULSION RD MATERIA3, IKOCH MATERIALS I ELF ASHALT I JACOE PUBLIC i RACAREYNOLDS JUGHMANCONSTHALTI INC. I AND . OPEN DATE JUNE 11t 1992 1 I I I I I -1 I I I -1 N IQUANTITY I DESCRIPTION 1 VENDOR VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR 1 VENDOR SECTION A i 1 1, 1 IHOTMIX DELIVERED NIB { NIB 1 $20.50 $23.83 1 NIB I I A. DEDUCT FOR PICKUP I NIS NIB $2.00 I $4.33 1 NIB I 1200-6OOTN1 P. ADD FOR INSTALL N/B I NIS 1 $5.00 I $15.00 NIB I, 1 500+TNS CI. ADD FOR INSTALL ` NIB I NIB 1 $2.50 1 $6.00 I N/8 I I i I I I I SECTION B I 2. I 1COLD MIX DELIVERED NIS 1 NIS I NIB i NIS j $24.00 I I SECTION C I I I 10 ASPHALT I NIB NIB I NIB 1 NIB 1 N/B I ..6232 NIS NIB NIB 4, I 1CRS-2 1 H35 AL 6232 I NIS NIB NIB I 6. I IMRS-2 I .635 GAL 1 .6232 I N/B I NIB I NIB I 6, IMS-2 1 7, IPRIME NIB I NIB NIB I NIB { NIS I I 8, IAEP PRIME .636 1 ,7532 I NIB I N/8 I N/B I I I I I i i I' q, ~ 1HOT WATER DILUTION 0636 .0636 NIB NIB NIB I I SECTION D I 1 1 I I I; 10.1 IPB-4 PkECOATED AGGREGATE NIB NIB N/13 NIB NIB { /8 I N/B I NIB { NIB N/B I? I I A. FOB DENTON JOB SITE NIB I 1 I I B. FOB DENTON STOCKPILE B NIB NIB NIB I NIB ~s I1.~ IPS-6 PRECOATED AGGREGATE N/B I NIB NIB I NIS 1 NIB I; f A. FOB DENTON JOBBITE I NIB I NIB I NIB I NIB B i NIS B. FOB DENTON STOCKPILE I NIB I NIS 1 NIB N I H/B io y 124 HR TELEPHONE NUMBER 1 I 1 I a 1 m N ao I PAGE 2 ut 2 BID N 1377 1 1 1 I 1 ~ I 810 NAME ASPHALT,EtWLSION RD MATERIAL 1 SUNMOUNT CORP VULCAN SOUTHERN 1 1 MATERIALS J ASPHALT AND 1 OPEN DATE JUNE 11, 1992 1 1 PETROLEUM 1 # QUANTITY I DESCRIPTION 1 VENDOR VENDOR 1 VENDOR 1 SECTION A I 1. 1 1HOTMIX DELIVERED 1 $21.80 TANDEM 1$23.76 TRAILER 1 NIB 1 I 1 1:20.90 TRAILER I I I 1 I A. DEDUCT FOR PICKUP $2.90 1 $5.76 1 NIB 1 1200-600TN1 B. ADD FOR INSTALL 1 $10.00 1 $23.76 1 NIB 1 1 600+TNS 1 C. ADD FOR INSTALL $6.00 1 NIB 1 NIB 1 I 1 SECTION B I 1 I 2. 1COLD MIX DELIVERED $22.50 1 $23.08 1 N/A I 1 SECTION C I i 3. 1A010 ASPHALT N/B 1 NIB .3744 GAL 4. IORS-2 1 NIB NIB NIB 1 6. 1 IMRS-2 { NIB NIB NIB 1 6. 1 1MS-2 NIB NIB NIB 1 7. 1 1PRIME NIB NIB NIB g. I 1AEP PRIME NIB 1 NIB I N/B 9. I 1HOT WATER DILUTION NIB 1 NIB 1 NIB 1 1 ~ I I ~ SECTION D 1 I I 10.1 1PB-4 PRECOATED AGGREGATE 1 NIB 1 N/B 1 NIB I I A. FOB DENTON JOB SITE 1 NIB 1 $19.33 1 N/B B. FOS DENTON STOCKPILE I NIB 1 $19.33 I N/8 1 11,1 1PS-5 PRECOATED AOGREGATE 1 NIB 1 NIB N/B 1 I I A. FOB DENTON JOBSITE N/8 1 $19.68 NIB 1 'ate 1 B. FOB DENTON STOCKPILE NIB 1 $19.58 NIB 1 n ~1 12.1 124 HR TELEPHONE NUMBER t } Apeflda illllll. DjW CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. ,MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM DATE: June 29, 1992 TO: Denise Harpool, Senior Buyer FROMs Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering & Transportation SUBJECT: Bid #1377 - Asphalt Emulsion and Road Materials The department has evaluated the bids received on June 11, 1992, We find the prices to be acceptable, Please award the contract to the low biddor meeting specs for each item. Jr Car~~~ AE90016B 8171666.8200 D/FW METRO 484-2529 s ~i Me DATE: July 7, 1992 CITY COUNCIL REPOR'T' TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1378 PRECAST MANHOLES RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder, Dalworth Quikset, in the total amount of $23,920.00. SUMMARY: This bid is for eight manholes to be used by the Electric Distribution Department in servicing the Exposition Mills Outlet Mall. Two bid responses were received In reply to two notices mailed. BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet, Memorandum from Don McLaughlin PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Distribution, Utility Customers of the City o Denton FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this purchase will be taken from Electric Distribution Revenue account#612-080-RB90-9220. Respect ully submitted: r' F~ . L1 yd V. Harrell City "Manager Prepared by. Name: Den se Harpool Title: Senior. Buyer A proved: Name: Tom D. Shaw Title: Purchasing Agent 278, DOC 1 'I v r~ knrida No.. BID N 1378 BID D PRECAST MANHOLES IBROOK9 PRODUCTSI DALWORTH OPEN DA 17UNE 11i 1992 i INC QUIKSET CO M ITEM DESCRIPTION II- --I I ' VENDOR VENDOR I I I I PRECAST MANHOLES $2,990.00 I ;2,680.00 (8 EACH) I ! I ~ I I DELIVERY I 21 DAYS I 16 DAYS I ) I I I 1 i 1L P /Wilda No. -tar Da?~ A!lenda 11om ~S D~,TY of IDENTONMMCIPAL UTII,ffWS/9o1-A Texas Street/Denton,TX 76201 - - HEMORA=UM TOt Denise Harpool, Senior Buyer PROMS Donald L, McLaughlin, Distribution Engineering Administrator DATE= June 17, 1992 SUBJECTS BID #1378 mrrrr,errarmmmsrrsrrrrmrwammrrreew rrrmwwrmaamnrrammmmrswrarrrrarrrr Award bid #1378 to low bidder Dalworth Concrete Products. DalWorth's bid was $2,580 per manhole. The total cost of r, manholes will be $23,920. These manholes will be installed gat Exposition Mills, The accounting number to charge is 612 080-18890-CO45-9220.2203. DLMttn f 06152387„G.- , 11 lncc, R. E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities Jim Harder, Director of Electric Utilities n ,1 DATE: July 7, 1992 CITY COUNCIL'., REPORT Q TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1379 CABLE 4/0 CONCENTRIC & 500 COMPACT COPPER RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid he awarded to the low bidders meeting specifications for each item. Item 1 to Stuart Irby In the total amount of $190180,00 and items 2 and 3 to Cummins in thto total amount of $108,900.00. SUMMARY: This bid is for underground cable used by the Electric Distribution Depa~rtme'nt throughout the City of Denton's system. These bid items are to replenish warehouse inventory, Cable offered by vendors other than Kerite, for items 2 & 3, did not meet our specifications for lifetime warranty and construction of the semi-conducting shield, Sixteen responses were received In reply to thirty bids mailed. BACKGROUND; Tabulation Sheet and memorandum from Don McLaughlin PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Distribution Departmont and utility customers FISCAL IMPACT; LI'unds for this purchase will be taken from Warehouse Working Capita or E ectric account #710-043-0682.8708. Respe' utly submitted: L10Y Harrel' City Manager Prelim pared bl`1 QrY' Name, Den se Harp i Title; Senior Buyer proved; Name: Tom D, Shaw Title: Purchasing Agent 283. DOC f'y BID $ 1379 I I I I I f BID NAME CABLE 4/0 CONCENTRIC 6 TECHLINB I I I I I STUART IRBY (PREFERRED SALES( KBS I CUMMINS 250 d 500 COMPACT COPPER OPEN DATE JUNE 16, 1992 I I I I _ I I I f $ 'QUANTITY i _ DESCRIPTION I I I I VENDOR I VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR I VENDOR 1. I I CABLE 4/0 CONCEI4MC I I I I I I I $1,726 I =1.370 I NIB ~ $1.540 I $1.496 I 2. ' i CABLE, 500 KC MIL I I , I I $5.015 J $5.820 ~ :7.990 I $5.330 $7.950 I 3. + CABLE, 250 KC MIL i $3.459 + $3.500 I $4.920 I $3.230 I $4.900 I I I I DELIVERY I 84-98 DAY 63-154 DAY I 7,2 DAYS I I I I I 16-22 WKS MANUFACTURER CON DUMEY f KERITE I PERRILLI ~ CABLEC I BID N 1379 ~ I I I I 1 ,BID NAME CABLE 4/0 CONCENTRIC & I TEMPLE I LAMBERT I I I I POLELTNE I JACOB9 IND. PAIESTER 260 6 500 COMPACT COPPER OPEN DATE JUNE 16, 1992 I I I + ' I~ I I 1 (QUANTITY I DESCRIPTION ,I VENDOR ~ I----- -I• I ~I ~ ~i♦ Y I VENDOR I VEtiDOR I VENDOR ~ VENDOR I l i CABLE 4/0 CONCENTRIC f =1.486 $1.643 I I I I I I (1.596 ~ $1.883 $1.640 I ~2, i CABLE, 500 KC MIL I I I I f $5.960 i $5.789 I $5.547 I $6,267 $4.060 I 3. i CABLE, 260 KC MIL I $31797 I $3.498 I $3.356 I $4.603 I I I $6.360 j I I I DELIVERY I f 115-130 DAYS , I I I I I I 16-22 WKS I 14-16 WKS 13-18 WKS MANUFACTURER I CABLEC i PERRILLI PERRILLI OKONITE i HENDRICK td Iii n S RONE I I I f ~ i I I N~ I I V I I NO BID RESPONDENCE I I I DEALER ELECTRIC I 91 AMP IN O C NELSON ELECTRIC CL,tFFORA OF VERMONT FUSON MORON EY,ETROTECH SYSTEM i I G 1 Aperrda D CITY of DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES/901-A Texas Street/Denton, zx 76201 MEMORANDUM TOs Denise Harpool, Senior Buyer FROM$ Donald L. McLaughlin, Distribution Engineering Administrator DATEI June 26, 1992 SUBJECTi SID #3.379 r r r ra > lr q r.7 m m m r r mr m,a r r r r a r L a m w v e p w r m w r r b r w r w m w r a m r r r a r m r w a w m r r w m a m r v Award the 140000 feet of 220 mil 4/0 concentric to Stuart Irby, low bidden. Stuart Irby's bid was for Reynolds, at $1,37/ft., for a total cost of $19,190. Delivery was quoted for 63 days, Award the 10,000 feet of 500 KC MIL compact power cable and 6,000 feet of 250 KC MIL compact power cable to Cummins, for Kerite. The bid for 500 power cable was $7,95/ft, for a total cost of $79,500. Delivery was quoted as 12 to 14 weeks, The bid for 250 power cable was $4.90/ft, for a total cost of $29,400, Deliverl, was quoted as 12 to 14 weeks, Kerite was the only manufacturer to mrlt specifications. The 500 and 250 cable are for projects such as Exposition Mills and South Locust underground conversion. The previous cable specification was changed because of problems with stripping the cable for terminations. The other consideration is the importance of the circuits where this cable will be used, I called Greenville and the Univeruity of Texas for references. Notch placer9 have used Kerite cable, and said that the cable provide the long-life and trouble freo- operations needed for r.,eliable electric service. A spreadsheet of tlid #1379 is attached. DLM t to 06262391 c .)Attachment c: - Ih?5g3.kp: A e ~c BID 1379 ITEM 1 26-Jun-92 14,000 FEET OF 4/0 CONCENTRIC 220 MIL 01;49 PM DISTRYBUTOA MANUFACTURER ~/FT E_XT. COST ~O. U. D_ELIVERY CUA+IMINS -CABLEC--- $1,495 - $20,930 STOCK TEMPLE _ CABLEC _ $1486 $20,804 _ STOCK LAMBERT CABLE PIRELLI $1.64 -$-2-3,00-2- 1.38. 115 DAYS - JA-CQBS INDUSTfiIE5 OKONI7E _ $1,883 __$26,367 1_.317 14-16 WEE_K_S_ PRIESTER SUPPLY HENDRIX WIRE _ ^$1.fi40 $22,960 18 WEEKS _ Ti+CHLiNE CONDUMEX $1.726 - $24,164 - 84-98 DAYS Sl`UARTIRBY J RE1fNOLDS W~$1,370 $19,180_-- 63 DAYS KHS ELECTRIC -PIRELLI 640 _ $21,G60 w 1,38 1618 WEEKS LOW B I D ~ ------$1.37 . $19,180 63 DAYS n I ~ ao t BID 1379 ITEM 2 26-Jun-92 10,000 FEET OF 500 KC MIL COMPACT POWER CABLE 01;49 PM _ MET _ _T DISTRIBUTOR _ _MANUFACTURER SPEC. $%FT EXT. COST O. d._ DELIVERY NOTE- CUMMINS A u KERITE YES $7.950 _$79,500__ _ 12-14 WEEKS CUMMINS B ` CABLEC _ __N_0 $5;700 $57 000 STOCK TEMPLEA _ CABLEC NO _$5.960 $69,600 22-24 WEEKS 1/3 NEUTRAL TEMPLE B CABLEC ^-NO $5.701 _ $57,010 LAMBERTCABLE _ PIRELLI NO $5.780 $57,890 1,765 130 SAYS JACOBS INDUSTRIES OKONITE $6.267 $62,667 1.732 14-16 WEEKS PRIESTER SUPPLY ROME N0 _ $5.050 $53,58- 11-i3WEEKS _ TECNLINE CONDUMEX NO $6.016 $50,160 84-98 DAYS STUART IRBY PIRELLI---.--_ Np_- _ - - $5.820 _$58,200 154 DAYS KBS ELECTRIC u _ PIRELLI _ NO X5,330 $53,300 1.755 20-22 WEEKS PREFERRED SALES . KERITE -w_ _ - YES _ _$7.990 - - $791900 72 DAYS - LOW BID $5.016 $60,160 i k~ ,9 $ ` Iti N ~ i W 26-Jun-92 BID 1379 ITEM 3 01;49 PM 6,000 FEET OF 260 KC MIL COMPACT POWER CABLE ET _ - _ - DISTRIBUTOR-_ _-MANUFACT URER SPEC. _-FY _ $/FT EXT~C03 O_D• DELIVER WEEKS__.___. KERITf YES $4.900 $29,400 CUMMINS 12_ $3x50 $2260 CABLEC 0 -STOCK-.-_ _ ' 22-24 WEEKS 113 NEUTRAL CUMMINS B CABLEC IV0-_-- $3.797 $22 782 TEMPLE A NO $3.734 $22,404 STOCK _ TEMPLE B 6A--B-LE-C- JXM EAT CABLE PIRELLI _ NO $3.498 $20 988 1,48 130 DAYS - WEEKS JAC085 INDUSTFlIES OKONITE_--~_-_ N-$ $4 060 $24,350 - 1 ii 4- - 1563 WEEKS NI-- 4.603 $27,19 1.472 PRIESTERSIaPPLY~ ROME -IV_$3.469 $?0,164 T LIN 84-98 DAYS ECHE COiVDUM FJ( AYS _ STUART IRBY _ - PIRELLI N-- -$3.600 $2_ 11._000 164 D v `-"-j~3.23183 BS ELEI- - f'iRELI 72 DAYS LES~ KER Y$4.920 $29620 LOW BiD - $3.23 - N y Q ' Lt ~ . R V j I ~ V v, rv I. ~F Agenda Da;o Kerite Cable References 1. City of Bryan, Bobby Singleterry, (409) 361-3767 Bryan is a new user of Kerite. They now have one 600 amp circuit installed in an industrial park. They have had problems with the drain wires on Unishield. Currently, they use cable with a,1/3 concentric. They also have 21100 feet in stock for replacement of substation getaway circuits. He believed the cable stripped about the same as the rest. He said that soap and water worked better than cable cleaner to prepare cable for termination. 2. City of Greenville, David McCulla, (903) 457-3145 Kerite nary the sole cable source tip to two years ago. The specification was rewritten at the direction of their Public Utility Board. Approved manufacturers are Kerite, Okonite, and Hendrex. A life-time warranty is a requirement of the specification. They are very pleased with Kerite's past performance. 3. University of Texas, Homer Ward, (512) 471-62 The University of Texas has 8 to 9 years experience with Kerite. They have used Kerite cable for a remote campus research center. The University considers the loads critical. They extensively researched the cable before purchase. University representatives called several utilities in the Northeast who gave good reports on the cable. Splicing and terminating the cable was easy and forgiving. 4. El Paso Electric, Max Ludwig, (915) 543-4048 In 1984, they installed 2000 KC MIL Kerite cable in a static VAR System. In 1988, they began using Kerite in critical distriLution circuits. They consider splicing to be extremely easy. 06262391 i Agenda Ilem__s_ _ gale DATE: July 7, 1992 aG~~? y CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FRON1: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1380 CEMENT, LIME, & AGGREGA'T'E RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder for each item as follows: 1. Portland Cement (94#bg) Gifford-Hill $ 4.19 ea 2. Bulk Portland Cement Clifford-Hill $ 56.00 ton 3. Type X Bulk Cement Clifford-Hill $ 56.00 ton 4. 3/4 #4 Washed Rock F & G Trucking $ 9.58 ton 4A. 3/4 Class A Rock F & G Trucking $ 9.48 ton 5. 1 1/2" Rock F & G Trucking $ 9.58 ton 6. 4" - 8" Rip Rap F & G Trucking $ 9.58 ton 7. Flex Base F & G Trucking $ 7.68 ton 8. Type A Hydrated Lime Chemlime $ 64.71 cwt 90 Type B Hydrated Lime Chemlime $ 70.71 cwt i SUMMAR : This bid is for cement, lime, and aggregate to be used by the Street Department, Electric Distribution, and Water & Sower Field Services, These materials will be used for various City projects and for routine maintenance. TXI withdrew their bid which matte Gifford-Hill the low bidder for Item one. Eight responses were received In reply to thirteen bids mailed. BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Street Department and other Field Service Departments. FISCAL IMPACT:, Funds for this purchase will be taken from 1992 budgeted funds for each using departments, yiF t' AgUnda N0. Agenda Ilnm ~s CITY COUNCIL REPORT 7'~ JULY 7, 1992 PAGE 2 OF 2 Respe tfully submitted: - L yd d V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: ~ J Y Name: ben se Harpool ~ Title: Senior Buyer Approved: Name: Tom D. Shaw Title: Purchasing Agent 284. DOC i t-.uSb+W PAGE I of 2 BID $ 1380 1 1 ! 1 I ! 1 I BID NAME CEMENT, LIME 6 AGGREGATE VULCAN [HOWARD MCANEAR 1 DAVIS GIFFORD 1 TEXAS 1ND. I NORTH TEXAS I' EQUIPMENT 1 HILL ! k INDUSTRIAL I OPEN DATE JUNE 160 1992 I I 1 ! ! I_ I # IQUANTITY I DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR [ I I 1 I I I I I. 14500 SK I PORTLAND CEMENT NIB I NIB 1 $4.19 I $3.95 NIB 1 k l 2. 13 TRK LD I BULK PORTLAND CEMENT I NIB 1 NIB 1 $56.00 1 $56.28 I $59.28 1 1 1 I 1 3. 150-100TN I TYPE I HULK CEMENT 1 NIB I NIB 1 $56.00 I $59.78 1 $62.28 [ 1 1 I 1 I 40 1800 TN I CONCRETE AGGREGATE CLASS A $13.09 1 NIB 1 NIB I $9.83 [ NIB i' 3/4" #4 1 4 i [ ! 1 4A.I500 TN I CONCRETE AGGREGATE CLASS A I NIB NIB NIB 1 $9.83 1 N/B I I 1 I I ! I 3/8" ROCK I I 1 I 1;. I 1 5„ 1200 TN I 1 1/2" ROCK, LIMESTONE [ 612.84 NIB NIB $9.58 NIB ! 1 6. Iloo TN i 411-811 RIPRAP LIMESTONE I NIB I NIB I NIB 1 $11.42 NIB 1 k I I I I I I 7. 11000 TN (TYPE At GRADE 1 FLEXIBLE BASE [ $J.1.19 ` NIB NIB $8.33 N/8 [ ! k k'' 1 [ E, 8. 180,0000 I BULK TYPE At HYDRATED LIME ; NIB [ N/B NIB NIB NIB [ I 9. 1500,000$ I BULK TYPE B, SLURRY LIME I NIB I N/8 I N/8 NIB k NIB 1 1 I [ j I 1 I I !WITHDREW THEIR I P Ar I''. Fo Sr `D ! 1 1 1 I I BID } LX 1 I I I ! I I I ~ a I`. ~ kL l 1 9»r!+ti0 z,5 t. PACE 2 of 7. BID 1380 I I I I I ! I I BID NAME CEMENT, LIME & AGGREGATE I CHEM LINE ! LAFARGE CORP IF & G TRUCKING I I I ! I I INC I I ! OPEN DATE JUNE 16, 1992 I ! I I ! ~I I ~ 1 I 0 (QUANTITY I DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR { I } ~ ~ I I I I 1. 14500 SK I PORTLAND CEMENT I NIB I NIB NIB I I I I I I I I I I I' 2. 13 TRK LD I BULK PORTLAND CEMENT ! NIB I NIB I NIB I I ! ! ! I I I I I 3. 150-10OTN 1 TYPE I BULK CEMENT I N/B NIB I NIB I I I I I I I ~ I I' 4. 1800 TN I CONCRETE AGGREGATE CLASS A { NIB $9.83 ! $9.58 I I I I 3/4" #4 I 1 I I I I I I ! I I ! II 4A.1500 TN I CONCRETE AGGREGATE CLASS A I NIB I NIB $9.48 1 ! I 3/8" ROCK I I I I ! I I I 1 I I I 5. 1200 TN 1 1 1/2" ROCK, LIMESTONE NIB I $9.83 { $9.58 ( I I ! I ~ I I i I I,, 6. 1100 TN 1 4"-8" RIPRAP LIMESTONE I NIB $10.08 I $9.58 I I I I I ~ I I I ! 71 11000 TN ITYPE At GRADE 1 FLEXIBLE BASE I N/B $8.08 I $7.68 { I I I I ~ I 1 ! I' 8. IB0,000# I BULK TYPE As HYDRATED LIME I $64.71 I NIB I NIB I ! I I 1 I! 9. 1500,000# I BULK TYPE B, SLURRY LIME ! $70.71 I NIB ~ NIB I I I I I I I I I I I I i 1 ALL OR NONE I I I I I i I I I I I I FF? q ! E N i \7 9C I T Y TT COUNCIi 4 Y l Lrr Oo~~pO~°de6r p04p~~oOJM D _ L~ _r r~ o o'er r OvOQ~ P 0 ooOQ~ca6c r _ i Nonda No. A!Jenda Item) .fls2 Lblo ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated com- petitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has receiv- ed and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works or Im- provements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and plans and specifications therein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL Of' THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I,, That the following competitive bids for the con- struction of public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invitations", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City's Purchasing Agent filed according to the bid number assigned hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as be- ing the lowest responsible bids: BID JMBER COT CTO AMM&T. 1369 C.D. MCKAMIL $ 370500.00 1312 FLOYD GLENN SMITH EXHIBIT A 1381 APAC-'TEXAS $731,091.50 1381 PRECISION AIRFIELD LAYOUT AND STRIPING $ 342,798.50 7,869.00 1392 EDWARD MCDONALD Co. S$EE=j, NIz_. That, the acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids shall not constitute a contract: between the City and the person submitting the bid for construction of such public works or improvements h;arein accepted and approved, until such person shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice to Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and furnishing of performance and payment bands, after notification of the award of the bid. SECTION III. That the city Manager is hereby authorized to execute all necessary written contracts for the performance of the construction of the public; works or improvements in accordance with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and Bid Propos- als, and documents relating thereto specifying the terms, condi- A 'fill k 1 is AgLntla Itom_ tions, plans and specifications, standards, quantities and speci- fied sums contained therein. SECTION IV. That upon acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids and the execution, of contracts for the public works and improvements as authorized herein, the City Council here- by authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized contracts executed pursuant thereto. SECTjOI_V. That this ordinance shall become effective im- mediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED MID APPROVED this the day of . 1492. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ` ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: 0.0 Agenda tume.6 BID # 1372 I J /~S BID NAME CONTRACT CONCRETE WORK FLOYD GLENN I J SMITH OPEN DATE JUNK 16, 1992 I I q QTY DESCRIPTION J VENDOR I I I I ! 7.6.A-71 IREBUILT INLET (REMOVE AND I I REPLACE TOP) I IA. 4' INLET I $'700.oo I I IB. 6' INLET I $750.00 I EXHIBIT A J IC. 8' INLET I $800.00 I { ID. 10' INLET $850.00 I 7.6.A-8I ]REBUILT EXISTING INLET SPECIALI I I IA. 4' INLET I $1,900.00 IB. 6' INELT I $10900.00 I IC. 8' INLET $2,350.00 I I ID. 10' INLET $2,400.00 I 7.6.A-9I IINLET SITE PREPARATION I $150.00 8.1 I IBARRICADESr WARNING SIGNS I $200.00 I I ]AND DETOURS ( OPTIONAL) I I 8.2 I IDOWEL-ON INTEGRAL CURB $4.00 I 8.2-A I (CONCRETE CURB AND OUTTER I I I IA. 8' TO 250' I $7.50 J IS. 250' TO 1000' I $6.50 I IC, 1000' - UP I $6.00 8.3 I 16" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY IA. 0 TO 50 SQ YDS I $29.25 I IB. 50 TO 100 SQ YDS I $27.00 IC. 100 TO 500 So YDS I $24.75 I I 8.3-A I4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK I I I IA. 0 TO 50 SQ YDS 127.00 I IB. 50 TO 100 SQ YDS $20.00 I I IC, 100 TO 1000 SQ Y0 I $18.00 8.4 ICONCRETE MEDIANS I $20.00 { 8.6 ICONCRETE STEPS I $45.00 8,15 ICONCRETE RIP - RAP I $28.00 8.448 ]ABANDON INLET/LATERAL I $250.00 ~ I I I TOTAY. I $20r123.50 I ~ I I +$19r923.50 i i alto DATE: July 7, 1992 CI'.ry COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1369 ROOF REPAIR ELECTRIC PRODUCTION RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder, C.D. McKamie, in the total amount of $37,500.00. SUMMARY: This bid is for all labor and materials to replace a section of roof at the Electric Production Plant. C. D. McKamie was the successful bidder in replacing the McCormick St. Fire Station roof, his work was above average. In reply to twelve notices mailed, two bid responses were received. BACIWROUND: Tabulation Sheet, Memorandum from Jim Thune. i PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Production FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this purchase will be taken from Electric Production budgeted funds account #610-080-0251-8301. Respe ulty sub tted: Llc d . Harrell City Manager Prepared by: Name: Denis Harpool Title: Senior Buyor Aid -cd: Nama: Tom D. Shaw Title: Purchaoing Agent 280. DOC M:4.cu,EF F kf Agenda llcrc '45 BID 11 1369 I I IDAU BID D ROOF REPAIR ELECTRIC I CBS ROOFING f CD MCKAMIE PRODUCTION PLANT J I I OPEN DA JUNE 41 1992 I I I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR BASE BID I $39,707.00 I ;37,600.00 ~ I 1 I I NAILERS I $2.70 $2.60 I I I ADDITIONAL COST FOR I $18.00 $8.00 I OVERTIME I I I I i i i 1 P'n'AV{ 111 l~ F~011 f1r7 No, Agondo 11ol. Da10..~' ~ y1a__••_. Pill „ l TO: Denise Harpool, Buver FROM: Jim Thune, Plant Manager DATE: June 19, 1992 RE: ROOF REPAIR BID 01369 The Electric Production Department recommends accepting low bid from C.D. McKamie, for roof repairs to Units Three and Four. The following bids were submitttedr D, MgKamie CBS Mg~ha~ria_1 Base Bid 3 370600,00 $ 391,707.00 naillags 2.60 2.10 O/T 8.00 18.00 Bond ✓ Please Dr~oceed to Council for authorization. Executive Approvals: r _ Jim Harder, Director of Electric, Utilities Bob Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities Thank you, Jim Thu , . Electric Production Manager JT/ks cc: Jim Harder, Director Bob Nelson, Executive Director File: XXVI Requisition 0119666 tl Agnrida No. _ o~ Q p DATE; July 7, 1992 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM! Lloyd V. Harroll, City Manager ° SUBJECT: BID # 1372- CONTRACT CONCRETE WORK RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low over all bidder, Floyd Glenn .'math for an annual estimated amount of $75,000.00. SUMMARY: This bid is for all labor and materials to perform concrete repair for all City of Denton field crews. Floyd Smith was the successful bidder for the past year and was very competent, Three bid responses were received in reply to thirty three notices mailed. BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet and Memorandum from Jerry Clark, PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR CROUPS AFFECTED: Engineering, Streets, Electric Distribution, Water & Sewer and Traffic Departments. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this work will be taken from budgeted funds for concrete work from the individual Departments requiring the work. RespeC 11y submitted: 4LIod Hrrell ager Prepared by: Name jlse Harpo 1 Title: Senior Buyer proved: Name: Tdm D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent 282.1311) ~f S PAGE 1 of 2 BID N 1372 I I J I I ~ I I BID NAME CONTRACT CONCRETE WORK AMERICAN J FLOYD GLENN I CALVERT 1 1 PAVING I SMITH I CONSTRUCTION OPEN DATE JUNE 16, 1992 I I I I 1 I QTY { DESCRIPTION { VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 I I I I I I 2.11.5 I [RING AND COVER (INLETS) 1 $165.00 1 $150.00 $500.00 ) SP J REINFORCING STEEL 1 $0.30 $0.30 $3.90 SP-2 I ISAW CUT (EXISITING CONCRETE;) J $3.80 } $3.00 ~ $5.00 J SP-3 I ISTRUCTURAL CONCRETE (CLASS A) { $324.00 { $300.00 1 $190.00 I IFOR HEADWALLS I I I I 3-A I IREMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT 1 $13.50 1 $9.00 1 $9.00 1 3-B 1 IREMOVfi CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 1 $3.50 1 $3.50 1 $7.00 1 3-C I IREMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY I $13.50 1 $75.00 I $6.50 1 1 (AND SIDEWALK I I I I 3.3 1 (UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 1 $10.00 I I $7.00 5.7-B 12" ASPHALT PAVEMENT (TYPE 1 $75.00 I I $70.00 { [D PATCH MATERIALS) 1 I 1 1 5.8-A 1 16" CONCRETE PAVEMENT 1 $29.25 1 $29.25 1 $45.00 1 1 ((RADIUS, ETC) [ I I I 5.8-B 1 18" CONCRETE PAVEMENT I I I I I I (RADIUS, ETC.) I I I I I A. 0 TO 50 SQ YDS (8") $31.68 1 $32.40 I $60.00 1 I 1B. 50 TO 100 SQ YDS (8") { $29.68 1 $30.15 1 $50.00 1 I 1C. 100 TO 500 SQ YDS (8") J $27.68 1 $27.90 1 $40.00 6.7.2-A1 (ADJUST MANHOLE AND INLETS 1 $27.50 1 $350.00 I $750.00 1 IWINGWALLS, ETC., SEE ITEM 1 [ $250.00 1 I ISP-3 FOR STEEL I I I I 7.64A-1} 14' ID MANHOLE (0' TO 6' DEPTH)( $1,045.00 1 $950.00 1 $20000.00 1 7.6.A-21 15'X5' JUNCTION BOX (O' TO 6' 1 $1,155.00 1 $1,000.00 1 $20500.00 I a I [DEPTH) I I I I ra. 7.6.A-31 14' INLET (0' TO 6' DEPTH) 1 $1,100.00 1 $900.00 I ,$250.00 1 " 7.6.A-41 16' INLET (0' TO 6' DEPTH) 1 $1,265.00 [ $10050.00 I $3,500.00 1 j 7.6.A-51 18' INLET (0' TO 6' DEPTH) 1 $10485.00 I $1,300.00 I $4,500.00 1 106.A-61 110' INLET (O' TO 6' DEPTH) 1 $11650.00 1 $1,400.00 I $5,500.00 1 l °o ~ Q . li i' PAGE 2 of 2 1372 I I SID 4 I I I CONTRACT CONCRETE WORK AMERICAN I FGUYD GLENN I CALVERT BID NAME I PAVING I SMITH I CONSTRUCTION I I I I OPEN DATE JUNE 16, 1992 _ VENDOR I VENDOR VENDOR I 4 I QTY 1 DESCRIPTION I 7.6,A-7I (REBUILT INLET (REMOVE AND i I I IREPLACE TOP) I 6797.50 I 6700.00 I :1,500.00 I IA. 4' INLET I 6880.00 I 6750.00 I 62,000.00 I IB. 61 INLET I 6990.00 I 6800.00 I 62,500.00 I I IC. 8' INLET I 61,017.50 I $850.00 I 63,000.00 I ID. 10' INLET I I 't.6.A-8I REBUILT EXISTING INLET SPECIALI 62,200.00 I 61,90(1.00 I 61,500.00 I IA. 4' INLET I 62,200.00 I 61,900.00 I 62,000.00 I I IS, 6' INLET I 62,750.00 62,350.00 I 62,500.00 I le, a' INLET I ID. I 62,400.(0 I 63,000.00 10' INLET 62,750.00 } 6165.00 I 6150.00 I 61,100.00 I I I 618,000.00 7.6.A-91 (INLET SITE PREPARATION I IBARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS 6330.00 6200.00 I I I I 8.1 I I LAND DETOUR(OPTIONAL) I I I 615.00 IDOWEL-ON INTEGRAL CURB 64.00 64.00 I 8.2 I 1 1 I 8.2-1 I ICONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER I 68.00 I $7.0 1 625.0D I I IA. S' TO 250' 66.50 66.50 I 618.00 I IS. 250' TO 1000' I 66.00 I 66.00 I 615.00 I IC. 1000, - UP I I I 8.3 I 16" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY 629.25 I 629.25 I 630.00 I IA, 0 TO 50 SQ XDS I 627.00 I 627.00 I 629.00 i IS, 50 TO 100 SQ YDS I 624,75 624.75 I 627.00 I IC. 100 TO Soo SQ YDs I I I I 8.3-A I I4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK 1 .00 I 627.00 640.00 I IA. 0 TO 50 SQ YDS 621 I 620,00 J 620.00 I 631.60 25 Is, 50 TO 100 SQ YD9 I 618.00 I 618.00 I 622.50 I m ' I I IC. 100 TO 1000 SQ YD8 I 631.50 I 620.00 I 636.00 I i3 a 8.4 I ICONCRETE MEDIANS 645 86 I ICONCRETE STEPS 631.50 I .00 I 6250.00 I S 629.25 I 628.00 I 6200.00 I , 8,15 I ICGNCRETa RIP - RAP I 6250.00 I 6250.00 I 61,000.00 I 8.448 I IABANDON INLET/LATERAL ` I I I QT I I I I I I .''C 0 Q I I I 651,082.40 I 74.89 620123.50 I Cl I I I TOTAL 623x0 I I I } "6221632.39 ''6191923.60 I R641,005.40 * TOTAL FOR ITEMS ALL VENDORS BID ON - DELETING 3.3 - 5.78 AND 8.1(ERROR BY CALVERT.) Ij .l s~ i? rr Aj rich No. Age+,11a 1I0III lbW q /D CITY OI DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNBY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM DATE: June 29, 1992 TO: Denise Harpool, Senior Buyer FROM: Jerry Clark, Director of E-.►gineering & Transportation SUBJECT: Bid #1372 - Contract Concrete Work The department has evaluated the bids received on June 16, 1992. We find the prices to be acceptable. Please award the contract to Floyd Smith Concrete who was the low overall .bidder. Je r Car CQ~~ AEE0016B 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 I "1 ::411F Apanda dJa. ~~D~?U A17ea0 Ilcro. Halo ___7=]~~ DATE: July 7, 1992 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1381 TAXIWAY & APRON IMPROVEMENTS RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder per schedule, APA.C-Texas for schedule I at a total base bid of x,731, 091.50 and precision Airfield Layout & Striping for schedule 11 at a total of $42,798.50. SUMMARY: This bid Is for all labor, materials and equipment for repair and resurfacing of the runway at Denton Municipal Airport, Four bid responses were r,aceived in reply to fifteen notices mailed. BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet, memorandum from Joe Thompson PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS' OR CROUPS AFFECTED: Airport staff and citizens utilizing the Denton Municipai :;sport FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this project will be split between the City of Denton and the FAA. The City will paying 105 from account #402-022-AG05-0001-9120. Reap fully su fled; ,lo d Harrell City Manager Prepared by: Nam©: Denise Harpoo. Title: Senior Buyer Approved: Name: Tom D, Shaw Title: Purchasing Agent 279. DOC x'.~:14p~y E- 31 la ~tirlv., 111Yk1;1 I BID M 1381 I I I ! ! BID NAME TAXIWAY AND AIRPORTI PRECISION ! I I ,7AGOE I SUNMOUNT I APAC-TEXAS I IMPROVEMENTS AIRFIELD I PUBLIC I I INC. I I LAYOUT AND I OPEN JUNE 180 1992 I STRIPING ! I I _k I ITEM DESCRIPTION j VENDOR EW VENDOR -i VENDOR ! VENDOR ! 1.1 TOTAL BID SCHEDULE I I N/B I $832,295.15 1 $894,491.00 I $731,091.S0 I 2.1 TOTAL SID, SCHEDULE It ! ! I I ALTERNATE 1 I N/B 1 ;783,695.15 1 $802,951.00 1 $672,291.50 I I I ! I I I 3.1 TOTAL BID, SCHEDULE II I $42,997.25 I $69,717.25 I N/B I N/B 1 I I I { I BOND I C.C. ENCLOSED I YES 1 YES I YES I j ~y m ro ~ I!I n~ i I v ii 7J i Arjenr)a Pfa. _..L~' ~D Agenda Ilnm_~5~ _ Oato DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CITY OF DENTON M E M O R A N D U M TO: Denise Harpool, Purchasing Agent FROM: Joe Thompson, Airport Manager DATE: June 29, 1992 SUBJECT: Runway Overlay After reviewing the Bid Tabulation by Freese and Nichols, Inc., the F.A.A. has issued a Grant Offering for $810,000.00 or 90% of cost with the City paying $90,000.00, or 10% of the cost for a total cost of $900,000.CO. The City Attorney's office is preparing a Resolution for the acceptance of the F.A.A. Grant by the City Council on July 7, 1992. Please prepare the Bid Tabulations on Schedule I Base Bid for a contract with APAC-Texas, Inc. of Fort Worth, Texas. Also, Schedule II Runway Painting, Taxiway & Apron with refleci:ive marking for a contract with Precision Airfield of Denton, Texas. on, r.poYt Plana er Joe T 6P-'S* JT:cg . cticvxq II Eiln TAULILA77ON DATE; JUNE 18, 1992 TIME: 2:00 P.M. PROJECT: Runway Overlay and Taxiway & Apron Improvement Denton Muncipal Airport FAA Projec. No. 3-48-0067-•07••92 City Project Bid No, 1381 Denton, Texas $898,186,00 iugineer's Estimate SCHEDULY:I PREPARED BY: Vreese and Nichols, Inc. En Ineer's Estimate SCHEDULLII 381890.00 Apse Tots, Inc. Precision Airfield :Den blieCo• S unnio;T.7,,,,.2 P.O. Box 1807 Layout do Striping 11 x 250 P.O. Fort Worth, Tx. 76101 P•O, Box 250 x. 76202 RoanokDeItem No. Description uantit Unit Cost mount Cost t ,SCHEDULEI BASE BID 11,140 TON S28.00 1311,920.00 N.B. $0.00 $29.00 $329,060.00 $33.00 5357,620,00 1 Bituminous Surface Course 2 Bituminous Tack Coat 18,000 GAL $0.55 $9,900.00 NR $0.00 $1.25 $22,500.00 $0,50 $9 • 3 Rum"ySpot Repalrs 51600 S.Y. $7.00 $39,200.00 N.B. $0.00 $12,88 $72,118.03 59.00 $50,400.00 30 4 Pavement Milling 2,653 S.Y. $1,50 $3,97950 N.B. $0,00 $3,10 $8, E $ 50 5295~000t3 5 Stress Absorbing Membrane Interiaycr 84,400 L S. $8,2000000 $2$8 2 0'00 N g $0,00 $45,675.00 5$45,675.00 $19,000,00 $19,000,00 6 Shoulder Grading .00 55000.00 7 Temporary Marking 1 L5. $2,500,00 $2500.00 N.B. $0.00 $2000,00 $2000,00 $5,000 6 Temporary Lighting 1 LS. $5,500.00 $5,500.00 N.D. $0,00 $2,227,85 $2,227.85 55,00000 $1,000.00 9 Herbicide 25 GAL. $20.00 $500.00 N.B. $0.00 $44.00 $1,100.00 512000000 10 Micro Seal Surface Course 60,000 S.Y. 5235 $141,000,00 N.H. $0.00 $2.00 $L20,~ 11 Bituminous7ackContforMicro5eal 6,000 OAS.. $0.53 $3300.00 N.B. $0.00 $1,25 S7 .00 $0.50 $3W0•0 $731,095.60 $0.00 $832,296.16 =894,491.00 ToW Base Bid - SCHEDULED 1 Pepe 1 J dl~ CL • ro w 'T. 3 , ~O e: at..rr i' i, B10 TABULATION DATU: JUNE 18,1992 TIME; 2:00 P. M. PROJECT, Runway Overlay and TaxiwayRApronImprovements Denton MuneipM Airport FAA Project No. 3-48-0067-07-92 City Project Bid No. 1381 Denton, Texas E'ngineer's Estimate SCHEDULE f 5898,186.00 PREPARED BY; Freese and Nichoti Ino, En ineer's Estimate SCHEDULE If $81890,00 Apac-Texas, Ina Precision Airfield Jagoe-PubHo Co. SunmountCorp. PA, Box 1807 Layout do Striping P.O. Bout 250 P.O. Box 1770 Forl Worth, Tx. 76141 P.O, BOX ?M Denton, Tx. 76202 Roanoke, Tx. 76262 Denton Tx. 76202 item No. Descrl tlon uantil Unit Cost Amount Cost Amount Cost Amount Cat Amount SC11L'D 81 ALTERNATE NO, I 1 Bituminous Sur race Course 11,140 TON $28.00 $311,920.00 N.B. $0.00 529.00 $323,060.00 $32,00 $356,480,00 2 Bituminous Tack Coat 18,000 OAL $0,55 $9,900.00 N.B. $0.00 $1.25 $22,500.00 $0,50 $9,000.00 3 RunwaySpot Repairs 5,600 S.Y. $7.00 $$9,200.00 N.B. $0.00 $12.88 $72,129,00 $9.00 $50,400.00 4 Pavement Milling 2,653 S.Y. $1.50 53,979."A N.D. $0.00 $3,10 $8,224.30 $7,00 518,571.00 5 Stiess Absorbing Membranelnlerlayer 84,400 S.Y. $2.43 $205,092,00 N.D. $0.00 $2.70 $227,880.00 $3.50 $295,400.00 6 Shoulder OradIng 1 L.S. $8,200,00 $8,200,00 N.D. $0.00 $45,675.00 $45,675.00 $19,000,00 $19,000,00 7 Temporary Marking I L.S, 52,500.00 $2,500.00 N.D. $0.00 32,000.00 52,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 8 Temporary Lighting 1 L.S. $5,500.00 $5,500.00 N.D. $0.00 $2,227.85 $2,227,85 $50.00 '5,000.00 9 Herbicide 25 OAL. $20,00 $S00.00 H.B. $0.00 $44.00 $1,100.00 $60.00 11,500.00 10 Emulsified Asphalt Slurry Seil 60,000 S.Y. $137 $02,200.10 N.D. $0.00 $1.19 $11,400.00 $0166 $39,640.00 11 Bituminous Tack Coat for Slur Seal 6,0001 GAL. $0.55 $3300.00 N.B. $0.00 $1,25 $7500.00 0.50 $3000.00 Totni Bid - SCHEDULE I ALTERNATE. NO, 1 $672,291,50 $0.00 $783,695.15 $8021951.00 Page 12 ~ n N N - 7 o r ~ snu~u: Ng9kL!SW1i ti • BID TABULA 77ON DATE: JUNE 18, 1992 TIME: 2:00 P,M, PROJECT; Runway Overlay and Taxiwsy&Apron lmprovemenis Denton Muncipal Airport FAA Project N4.3-48-0067-•07-92 City Project Bid No. 1381 Denton, Texas Engineer's Estimate SCHEDULF.I $898,186.00 , PREPARED BY:. Freese and Nichols, Inc._ Engineer's Estimate SCHEDULE 11 $81890.00 Apso-Texas, Ina. , Precision,Airtkld,•; Jagoe-Publioco. Sunmountcorp, P.O. Bac 1807 L I - i&$ tdplnE•: P,O, Box 250 P.O, Box 1770 Fort Worth, U 76101 ~t`"P O. $cot 250 Denton, U 76202 Roanoka,'IM6262 nto4 Tx.76 Isom No. Descri Lion uantit Unit Cost Amount Cost Amount Coat Amou 1 Cott mount SCHEDULEII,. $0,62 $63,240.00 NIB, $0.00 I RumvayPaintinS 102,000 SF• N.B. $0.90 $0,37 $37,740,00 2 Taxiways & Apron Painting 8,300 S.F. NIB. $0,00 $0,37 $3,071.00 $0,62 ' $5,146.00 " NIB. $0,00 3 Retro-Reneciive Markers 2.50 PA. NIB. $0.00 17.95 $1987.50 $5.33 51331,25 NIB. $0.00 Total Bid - SCHEDULE 11 $0.00 :•12,768,60 i $69,717.25 $0.00 I r Page 3 dN' ' ~ 3 Q • V j+, i u +.i i A~eruL~ Ilanf_.!~-5_+~~,Lg~ DATE: July 7, 1992 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1392 TENNIS COURT SLAB/OVERLAY RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder, Edward McDonald Co- ,in the total amount of $37,869.00. SUMMARY: This bid is for the labor and materials to lay anew post-tension concrete slab wearing surface on the existing tennis courts at Nette Schults Park. T vo bid responses were received in reply to three notices mailed. BliCKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Parks & Recreation Department and Citizens utilizing the park. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this project will be taken from Certificate of Obligation for Building Improvements account #445-031-PARK-921.5. 4Res ull y sub tted: Harrell City Manager Prepared by: S.l~ Gl,~-• ~ . Name: Denise Harpool Title. Senior Buyer Approved: Name: Tom D: Shaw _ Title: Purchasing Agent 281: DOC ~V f 1 flb+U:n~ BID 1392 I I I I THE TENNIS I EDWARDS I BID NAME Tennis Court Slab/Overlay I COURT CO. I MCDONALD CO. I I I ! OPEN DATE June 23, 1992 I I I I I I # (QUANTITY I DESCRIPTION I VENDOR VENDOR -.i I I -I I ! I I 1 i 1 (Lump Sum INew Slab and surface at I $38,025.00 I $37,869.00 I I I Nette Schultz Park I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! Bid Bond? I YES I YES I I ! I I Completions 45 DAYS I 70 DAYS I I I I I I I ~ I I I f I I I ! I I I I ! I I I I ! I I r I I 1 I t I I I I 1 i I I ! I I r i I I I I I j ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ! I I I I I I ~ * 4 fi f+ f; 1 CITY COUNCI] ri 11 o~~ado09~a pp~b 000 { ~ "~~°o' o° : o T Y ~OO~oO~"'QL CU ULU"~oooo~ t i! } Banda Pto, ~(~enda Itern.~0 ~~r.._ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR PURCHASES OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WHICH ARE AVAILABLE FROM ONLY ONE SOURCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PUR- CHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING AN EF- FECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 22.022 of the Local Government Code provides that procurement of items that are only available from one source, including: items that are only available from one source because of patents, copyrights, secret processes or natural monopolies; films, manuscripts or books; electricity, gas, outer and other utility purchases; captive replacement parts or components for equipment; and library materials for a public library that are available only from the persons holding exclusive distribution rights to the ma- terials; need not be submitted to competitive bids; and WHEREAS, the city Council wishes to procure one or more of the items mentioned in the above paragraph; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the following purchase's of materi.als, equip- meet or supplies, as described in the "Purchase Orders" attached hereto, are hereby approved: PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT 25224 MICHIGAN INSTRUMENTS INC 25368 GENERAL, ELECTRIC 110,296.98 ;171,606.00 SECTION LZ. That the acceptance and items shall not constitute a contract between othe City hand tithe person submitting the quotation for such items until such person shall comply with all requirements specified by the Purchasing Department, aCTION III,' That the city manager is hereby authorized to execute any contracts relating to the items specified in Section I and the expenditure of funds pursuant to said contracts is hereby authorized. 3 Dito a~ 9 SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective immedi- ately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY APPt:,,)VE1% AS TO LEGAL FORM: DERRi'. A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: . r~ pgonda 1,o. _ 9a~o ad - AfFewla ltem_ U3to DATE: JULY 7, 1992 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Membera of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #!25368 - GENERAL. ELECTRIC RECOMMENDATION. We recommend this purchase order to General Electric in the total amount of $17j,606.00 be approved. SUMMARY: This purchase order is for the materials necessary to replace the first stage nozzle block in unit four steam turbine, located at the Electric Production Plant. Due to design and compatibility requirements the nozzle block is only available from General Electric, making this purchase sole source. BACKGROUND: Purchase Order #25368, Memorandum from Jim Thune. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Production, Utility Customers of the City of Dentan. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this purchase will be taken from budgeted funds acct #610-080-0251-9'339. Respec ally submitted: Lloyd Harrell City Manager Prepared by: Name: Denise Harpobl Title: Senior Buyer Approved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. 'T'itle: Purchasing Agent 287.BID ^4 }1 2ns '1 1 THIS IS A, CITY 11 DEW UV, 1 EXAS CONFIRMING ORDER XX PQRCHASE ORDER NO: PC 25368 (IF MARKED) This nunibor must appear on all DO NOT DUPLICATE cross, a delivery slips, cases, clns boxes, packlrg slips and bills, flay No: Aid No: Date: 06 29 92 Page No. at /E NDOR PURCHASING DIVISION /,901.6 TEXAS STREE T 7 DENT ON, TEXAS 76201 LAME/ GENERAL ELEC791C 8177383-71`00 DIFKIMETRO61712670042 FAX8177387.4692 0DRESS P•C• BCX 6E5e21 DELIVERY CCNFIR04ATICN UNLY C21 ADDRESS ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION DALLAS TX 762t5 901 8 TEXAS STo DEN70N9 TX 76201 VENDOR NO. GEN64000 DELIVERY QUOTED 10 23 92 FOB DESTINATION TERMS 01 1*000 EA VENDCI1 CA • 4 N / A MFG NAME 1 8x129*000 1EE9129e4C CITY No 2092 NG2ZLE PLAIEDMG: STIL 106e-2 MIG MATERIAL PFOPRIETARY TG GoE• MACHINE NCN-CUMPETI7IVUs AVAILABLE CNLY FROM CNE SOURCE 02 15.000 EA YEl+DCA CAT* A N / f MFG NAME 1839000 30477.8( CITY 0 82052 BOLT. $CC h1:AO 00625 » 11X!.00L DUG: 04318501P0006 i ~p N Cl N PAGE TOTAL 7 001 GFAAL TC7AL : 1 1 AOer01 41 e14 08,13 0251 8333 171rE0e.00 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS: 3. Terms - Nel 30 wriless oihmwae specified iT 1. Send original Invoice with duplicate copy. 4. Shipping histruclions: F.O.B. Destination prepoltunless ov ervd3e speahecn 2, eig to - Accounts Payable G. No federal or state sales tax shall be included 216 E. McKinney St. In prices billed. purchasing Dlvleion~ n AJeni!a hlo, _~C1___.~! o7Q____ Agenda !1em_.de's_''~,;5 _G TO: Jim Harder, Director of Electric Utilities FROM: Jim Thuns, Electric Production Manager DATE: June 15, 1992 RE: UNIT FOUR STEAM TURBINE The Unit Four steam turbine is scheduled for major inspection this Fall, November 2, 1992 through December 18, 1992. During that inspection, first stage nozzle block replacement is recommended, The attached requisition is for the replacement nozzle block material. General Electric has issued a technical information letter, TIL 1086-2, concerning the first stage nozzle. Failures of nozzle have prompted GE to re- design the nozzle block and recommend at the first available outage, replacement to the new design. The nozzle black design and fabrication are proprietary to General Electric, This order is non-competitive, available from only one source, Funds were budgoted under the Electric Production budget account 8339. Lead time is estimated at 4-6 months, Please review the attached information and advise authorization to proceed to purchasing for procurement. Q_,11m Thun , Elect f; Production Manager JT/ks Attachment File: XXVI Lz,B.2, u 56 t ~i r., U 4 ri 1~11'Ida tic. kfotlda ltcm ~S ~ Ci T d~ 9 DATE: July 7, 1992 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: MICHIGAN INSTRUMENTS PO #25224 RECOMMENDATION: Council approve sole source purchase order to Michigan Instruments in the amount of $10,296.88. SUMMARY: This order is for the purchase of two cardiopulmonary resuscitator systems including cases, backboards, and oxygen cylinders. Michigan Instruments la the sole supplier and manufacturer of the Thumper equipment. BACKGROUND: Quotation from Michigan Instruments, Inc., memorandum from James Thomason, Assistant Fire Chief, and purchase order #25224 to Michigan Instruments, Inc. i PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Fire Department & Paramedic Mobile Intensive Caro Units (MICU). FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this purchase will be made from lease/purchase account 0720-004-0020-9142. ly submi ted: arroll *CityMa e r Prepared by: Name: Melanie A. Harden Title: Buyer A ` roved: \ Name: Tom D, Shaw Title: Purohasing Agent 285, DOC - ;r (E ~I f~ Agonda No. FAX FA.'C FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX FAX F*Yj "j; FX'1-6 Q FAX MICHIGAN INSTRUMENTS, INC. 1./9 6300 28th Street SE PHONE:(616) 942-$122 Grand Rapids, N1I 49546 FAX: (616),442-8984 DATE: ._FAX nMBER: car 7 ~/h # Of PAGES: (rncludlag Cover) TO: FROM: ,~/~trrcdk - m SUBJECT: MMSAGEbear Melanie: Below is a quote that you requested for the Thumper System. We are currently backordered to the end of July. Please order as soon as possible to reserve the units from that batch. QUOTATION Item 2 Thumper' Cardiopulmonary Resuscitator systems: $2.01220.00 2 Thumper unit ($1,996.00/ea) 2 Thumper' CIS Case (hard) ($278.00/ea) 2 Thumper Backboard w/straps ($246.00/ea) 2 MOG - E ($590.00/ea) Transportation Charges will be an additional $76.98 (FOB Grand Rapids) Michigan Instruments is the sole supplier and manufacturer of this equipment. Warrantyi 2 year warranty conditional upon misuse or alterations to Chei basic unit. Terms: It/20 Net 30 days This quota is valid for 60 days from the above data. Sincerely, ~J Yolanda Saladin Customer Service Coordinator 1-800-590-9939 IF YOU MOVE ANY QUESTIONS OR PROBLEMS REGARDrNG n-US TRANSI4ISSION, PLEASE CONTACT OUR OFFICES, „i7}7a ~f 'f Agenda Flo. Oo~D Aflenda tsmS`~ DOO g~y MEMORANDUM Tot Melanie Hardin, Assistant Purchasing Agent Proms James R. Thomason, Assistant Fire Chief~,,~- Dates June 16, 1992 Res THUMPER MECHANICAL CPR DEVICE 'I The Fire Department has been using the "Thumper" mechanical CPR device for approximately twelve years as a secondary aid device in CPR situations. The Thumper performs mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation while providing the patient with 100$ oxygen. We originally chose the "Thumper" brand due to ease of operation and reliability because of the distances our MICU's had to travel and often with only one paramedic to the patient. We feel the "Thumper" is still the best on the Market. Michigan Instruments no longer sells the Thumper through retail outlets but rather through the parent company making them a single source supplier. JRT/lh Cf T Y of L1EN I ON, TEXAS THIS IS A - PORCHASE ORDER NO: FC 2E224 CONFIRMING ORDER AX X This number must appear on all (IF MARKED) invoices, delivery slips, Cases, DO NOT DUPLICATE - clns., boxes, packing slips and bills. Date: cc 20 92 Page No, 0 1 Req No; Bid No: PURCHASING OIVISION 1901.8 TEXAS STREET I OENTON, TEXAS 76201 VENDOR .9177,789.7100 OIFW METRO 8 1 7/26 7 004 2 FAX 8!77382.4692 DELIVERY CL'lVFIRNATICK CALY NAME/ MICHIGAN INSTFUMENTS INC ADDRESS 6300 28TH ST SE CENTRAL RECEIVING C01 ADDRESS 90l 8 TEXAS ST• GFAND RAPIDS MI 4954b DEN7CN• TX 76201 TERMS VENDOR NO. PI044000 DELIVERY QUGTED 07 15 52 FOB DESTINATION 278.000 5_6.01 N / A MFG NAME py 2w000 EA VENDOR CAT• CITY A 46814 1HUMPEF C/S CASE HAFO 4e32901 MFG NAME 246.600 02 2•000 EA VEC111Y AA46514 N / A THUMPER lEACKBOARD M/STFAPS 19180901 MFG NAME 909000 03 2.000 EA VENDOR CAT; ,S& N / A CITY w 46514 VOC - E 76.9 MFG NAtIE 1.040 t 04 76•980 EA VENVOA CAT* A N / A CITY N 96286 FRGPAY&ADD FR E1GHT91F EXCEEDS• CONTACT BUYER. T N / A MFG MANE 2.996.000 7.992905 015 1.000 FA VECITY 0A +6514 1HUMPEF CAFOIOFULMCNARV RESUSCITATOR SYSTEMS l7 ~ ~ ro .y N C m a FAGS 7CIAL 2 6•S GFAkC T07AL 1~ 2 6°S 109256.58 01 720 404 0020 5142 3. Teens - Nei 30 Nnleas olherwjse specified I VENCOR INSTRUCTIONS: I. gml original involca with duplicate copy. d. Shipping Instructions: F.0.0. Destination prep* tunbss orheiwlse speediedl - 2. Bil, to - Accounts Payable 6. No lederal or state sales tax shall be Included pruchasinp Divislon^ 2111 E. McKinney 31. I,r prices billed. n.,.,.., rv ~cnnf c • s i€ waw,~ #CITY COUNCII H4i 00oooooaQoaooooo~ooo~oo . ~~~00 r o V t E ooo~~ °~acro~caa~c 'IF C 5 f It' Agenda No. y2 _ Agenda Item n". rate A la e, CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT DATE: July 7, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Consider and ordinance abandoning and vacating a portion of the Brazos Electric Transmission Line Easements - Loop 288 and Spencer Road RECOMMENDATION: The De"elopment Review Committee recommends approval The Planning and zoning commission recommends approval SUMMAR IBACKG OUN : The attached plat illustrated the easement for proposed abandonment. In October of 1987, the City of Denton purchased the Brazos transmission line in this area and was assigned the associated easements. Gary Hudson, First state Bank of Denton, has requested that this easement be abandoned. The existing easement bisects the property. The transmission line is not, energized. In exchange for the abandonment, the City will be granted a 20' Public Utility Easement along the Loop 288 and Spencer Road frontage of the First State Bank of Denton tract. AEFOO142 ~f ALL00240 Aye~icFa Atnm~•s'D ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE VACATING PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS ON 2.253 ACRFS OF LAND LYING IN THE MARY L. AUSTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 4, CITY OF DENTON, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING A PORTION OF EASEMENTS FROM C.M. SIMMONS ET UX TO BRAZOS ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC. RECORDED IN VOLUME 437, PAGE 613 AND VOLUME 449, PAGE 439 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS AND ASSIGNED BY BRAZOS ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC. TO THE CITY OF DENTON IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN VOLUME 2736, PAGE 825, REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Denton has received a request for abandon- ment of utility easements from First State Bank of Denton, Texas, owner of certain property affected by said easements; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton has determined that the easements being vacated are no longer needed for public use; and WHEREAS, the fair market valua of the easements have been de- termined and received in the form of execution of a new utility easement granted upon the property from First State Bank to the City of Denton in an easement executed on the 26th day of May, 1992, as required by section 272.001 of the Local Government Code and DENTON, TEX., CODE ch. 2 art. IV. (1991); NOW THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That public utility easements on 2.258 acres of land lying in the Mary L. Austin Survey, Abstract Number 4, City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, described in attached Exhibit "A" and being a portion of the easements described in instruments recorded in Volume 437, Page 613 and Volume 449, Page 439 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and assigned to the City of Denton in Volume 2736, lags 825 of the Real Property Records of Denton County, Texas are permanently vacated and extinguished as an easements for public utilities. SECTION II. That by reason of such vacation the City of Denton's property interest in the easements shall by operation of law, revert to the owner or owners abutting the easements herein abandoned and the City of Denton releases any and all claims to the use of the property as an easement for public utilities. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective imme- diately upon its passage and approval. Agenda FJo. Agenda Ilum~~ Sq``~ 1~ N to 'A fah PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992, BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY (l i Page 2 i1 i ArlondaIsom ~t S y'4!.5'1J_--. Into ._2!.2~a.~._ EXHIBIT "A" All that certain tract of parcel of land situated in the M. Austin Survey, Abstract 4, Denton County, Texas, being a part of a 41 + acre tract deeded to Malcolm Simmons et ux, from L.E. Walker et ux on March 7, 1946, recorded in Volume 324, Page 162, Deed Records of said county, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the north side of a public road called "Spencer Road" at a fence qorner 60 feet north of the southeast corner of said 41 acre tract; THENCE north 720 46' 30" west with said north side of Spencer Road 270.64 feet to a right-of-way monument on the east right-of-way of Loop 288; THENCE north 200 001 40" west with said Loop 288 right-of-way 59.7 feet to a right-of-way monument] THENCE northeasterly with a 1.95896 curve to the left having a tangent bearing north 320 461 52" east 126.6 feet to a right-of.-way monument; THENCE north 326 301 0811 east with said right-of-way 204.8 feet to an iron pipe for a corner; THENCE northeasterly with a 1.948880 curve to the left at 2.0 feet passing a right-of-way monument, continuing a totO distance of 332.57 feet to an iron pipe for a corner; THENCE south 2' 1i' 10" west with a fence 723.19 feet to the place of beginning containing 2.258 acres of land. AVE00015 A4kts plW I'LIP 4, n a 21o NTOf /CIIIIVNmCLORit&"1• AT~N NTNVIT. At/T1NCr A13, mT C" v VAMP INS PA1t= w tAAO 3,71116 21 m IUAT M 1 t , AnT1AC! N 1. 1x11 IT tpl70N, CnnM COMM. TlMt, A`0133" PAtr OO A IoAL l Il Alit T"" ""MIT om noo L. 1. mum " oz To 14ACotAt OtMN, A. K AT w Tot /n &AT or I NAAU, 1161, &XmO to 101- All, PAn 167, Dm R1- or CO41C11 t6111P1, TMY, A" Ott" M PARTIn1AMLT Ctt M AO POLIOYII 1s"m1 004P, 1Wi I COOOMMIN IM PO OW.11~oi OT 01 1 t7~"TTfL1I It AtCo"{ MIT 60.1 nO 2914 m &MMA►T e11Nm w 1 61 MI OX 1NAAT1 PsO "oT1 77 "am to /tmOTY I7 O3NO1 otlT Otn m 14IR11 l 3,7et or OAit Pro10P AOta A of{TAfolt or 711.61 TLtT ro A MOW 1tmorr :011AT POINT AT A P"" IN LOW PisI R TOW{ MPOO to imn{ 6{ MINOnt 77 O7tON{O w"T win $LSO VTR ,,,777y Tide oM m r 174017-M•W1 w "to 116 A nnA"t W 11.76 7117 n N tow plop Ttt•tr MOOTWf/01T MttN !1t Mn oto4T-w-IiT w out LOW Sol tiln A ~x To m As" PAY11A M t3AAML A1Wt OF NT o m to ""TL t1 1►tn►6. A Win w 29 11, P1 7 , A COM w NOOI t6 enAm 46 MAI IS ttWNt1 Mn 116.11 rCn sr Y An LOW" of St/.U n n AM im plot tAh MM Q 4, TmCt Mw71 It PONYO It M7oO7t{ 06 amet O WT VPt In r` 0PC5E.O S~ otONFw-W! M out IOw LII A 11"A"! w 106." r"r n Alt .1 S im plot uw {1N plan MOOTrtAe7aLr Mtn m WT uopn-a•r7 w wM, T [ Wn A MAO "M 1401 MV&SO A Cm LA w it t"om as P 0 "11NON / 1t001M, 1 Win of 1711 111T, A ttoAt w NONn 1t ram It MIA- 11 tltOppt WT 1{2.11 POINT, AO All ANC Lum. Os 1w 177.71 rW TO M IA" viol R~ P~ A ~OgNCPNMiFtt SJ~V`l AN 61,11 r MB L~tAf[A6AP66111to AS 91 11 sprons e.i"{{ct0771wt~ MMTL?[w1► 1" As PAM ow ~P A0 Q TA 63RTNlCR-1 comrl"" ' Gf no "m MT " NA" Of AM A.'~♦ ;~ohf±1 L OMY M. MMSIT, "/mtT SO IT "At m{ owIVRT WA - e•. o~T W. a ns as$" w 713 PWP 91Ablm "71ON most Ttm 93 Act&$ f Ms n IVnI{ul mt►W►Mmn, PNen111w6. OMOWtiot w _I gAgy WW MAIr" 1 . BAS O , ttmT Y ON" 128nM. JU It A+j S ~e 104 j ti 6 f~v~tt +to 7 m► PWttrt t1 n.wT mn t, WAS wrltw m lw TW A" *mWW Noprtw 4691POIM,oR T AOFM 4 !2911 N, w M.6"tn PAM {O ~ ~~~~{Npppp1{{ M}~ y1~ ♦ O7 New }yy yl, ~oO ~7 yN ~yO 7N3AR~MIpO~t yY}6pI M~ANINO7{I *I-'ItAtApNO~P~, 1m M7T1AYy/K/ MI MKI. ~ yoOf.IpmNy1~~Ny~Y"OtYyll pppr~.MAtw Oy3y~l~. (Lbj 1I! IAKIN. r PCA~_ t t,p pMP~IOpItY N YRW MN, INL VN. 00"=%z ~R O 1' 11NM~C J. W. CHE ~~RYF.Y_ 8 f3z4 4 s41 ft6 72iS0 ACMS N 71E 1x111 + UGA14f46 fIQgbr OG9~. d uo 1tu CONSULTINO ENGINEERS L SUMEYOR~ Y AUSTIN S71 MY AS. A Out Atw!016 Ir IWW9;f gFtiTC'I. Tt7A7 7dPOI Po►1711 MY AM COVItY M OtNTOK TIC Mel MO 6057 l doboomllkm& l~gQnd,t'~o. -oa nfleidj Itaill le . P&Z Minutes D31o - °2 May 13, 1992 Page 13 Mr. Glasscock noted that the problem is not really the duplex but the people in it, He also owns rental property and sometimes he gets good people and sometimes not. If there were two older couples with only two cars there wouldn't be a problem. This area has been commercial for a long time. Ms. Huey said that she is in opposition to the petition but only because the zoning for the whole area needs to be looked at before just one property is changed. She considers this to be spot zoning. Mr. Holt moved to deny Z-92.002. Motion was seconded by Ms. Huey, Mr, Engelbrecht agreed that he would like to see the area studied before the zoning is changed. It Is a moderate activity center and the proposed zoning would reduce the Intensity, but it might cause harm in another way. The area does have sofne geographic features that buffer it. He Is In favor of the motion. Mr. Kamman said that even if the zoning is left as it Is, the rental of the house could be just as bad, Mr, Engelbrecht said that there was a situation in his neighborhood where too many tenants were living in a house, They had to deal with the owner to get the problem resolved. Motion carried (41), Mr. Glasscock voted no. r-VII. Abandonments a• Brazoi electric transmission line easement abandonment - Loop 288 and Spencer Road Mr. Clark stated that the existing easement is located in the property on the northeast corner of Spencer and hoop 288, The Electric Department has recommended abandoning the easement in exchange for a 20' casement along the frontage of the tract. Mr, Engelbrecht moved to recommend approval of the Brazos transmission line easement abandonment. Motion was seconded by Mr. Kamman and unanimously carried (5-0), CITY COUNCII I _ iTirlilti ~QOOOq 0 pp~ oooOOOO o x e e O on~p f 71l . O ~oo~~~ ~ Q C G 0 G C 11111:iI IT Ill.., 11111 11 T1 TTIIII k bs Nq,nda No, Agenda Item D I)ale 4 CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKWNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager DATE: June 25, 1992 SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF PUBLIC OFFICIAL'S LIABILITY INSURANCE Reconoendation: That the City Manager be authorized to award an insurance contract to National Union Fire Insurance Company for Public Official Liability Insurance. 5uaaary: Quotes received from the bidding process are outlined on the attached paper. National Union Fire was not only the low bidder but also offered the lowest deductible at $25,000 for a $1,0001000 limit policy. All policies provide approximately the same basic coverage with the exception of National Casualty whose policy covers electric Utilities thus accounting for their higher premium. National Union Fire has the highest A.M. Best rating (A+ 15). A sample policy is also attached for your review. Background: The potential for the city of Denton to sustain an unacceptable large loss is likely to increase over the next few years and could present a danger to our Risk Retention Fund. Lawsuits under the Americans with Disabilities Act and other civil lawsuits will likely be filed as civil rights cases in Federal Court thereby stripping the city of State tort protection. Public Official Liability insurance will serve as protection from depletion of our Risk Retention Fund from such lawsuits. Fiscal Xapact: Premiums will be paid from the Risk Retention Fund. Respe fully Submi ted: Loyd V. Harrell City manager 8171566.8200 D/FIN METRO 434.2629 e a Agenda No. 7os _ Agenda Ilem S E~ Dmo - Z' a~ ~a Prepared byt L-~ p3j tt-C t~6 c w Max Blackburn Risk Manager Approved: kxecut . McGr ane ive Director of Finance MB:lb AFF002E2 i 1 ALL002AB Ago ndi No. Agenda Item egl Dale ORDINANCE NO. ON ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL OF NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY FOR PUBLIC OFFICIAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAItIS: SECTION I. That the proposal of National Union Fire Insurance Company for public official liability insurance coverage for the City of Denton, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, is hereby accepted. SECTION II. That the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and amount as specified in the agreement. SECTION I7,1L That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM2 DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY oe" ~f e! s' Aimildd pia :)adds Ilom /~S~r-C Law Enforcement and Public Officials a Liability insurance 1992 Bids N4 tional international casualtp xatioaal union Ins, co, Law Enforcement Fire Y,nfo em AN Beet Rating AX Best Rating A A-Xxv g 71M Hest' Rating 1►+zV 1,000,000 2,0001000 500000 *$103,273 Declined to 1,0000000 50,000 139,383 Declined to 21000,000 100,000 88,819 Bid Bid 119,872 Public Officials ability 1,0001000 50,000 11000,OOQ 100,000 56 6 100 , $37,816 1Q0 1,0001000 250000 200000000 25000 $32,240 46,425 200000000 500000 81000f000 500004 $53x153 ,231 4,0001000 501000 63,153 510001000 50,000 71,850 79,414 Elea Utilities N/A Airport N/A Yes No Prior Acts NSA Yes Yes No Pollution NSA No NO No Punitive Dmge N NIA No NO No Canpejlat~Qn BY ENDORSEMENT R noe ati Yes - 50$ NO BY ENDORSEMENT Yes - 20$ Yes - 25% * NoTEi Bids are contingent upon Kirin securing shotguns in all g tWO (2) additional police vehicles, jailers and Ai;midst NO -es x E1.3h ` NATIONAL. UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY or- PrrrsBUR(BK PA. A OWAL STOOK C0WMV t07~o 7oP1HEf OWN " Y OF%* 7 msow pUjU0 oFFOAL8 AND EMPLOYEES LIABIL ~~~CE (This Is a daima4n*da PoI Yt Ptesss In consideration of the premiums and in relianoe upon the statements made to the Insurer in the application, the Declarations page with Policy Form 89283 constitute the a * end the National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa, herein called the "Company agrees a INSUIR1NG AGREEMMS Ceveragss A, fa and C tOd A. The Company aim W will on behalf of claims fiimt made apolnntt the allbeasuse of a WrongfulA pr"ll ~ at the~~ to pay for any OMI is first made during the poikrY Period and written nctioe of said claim is "lved by the G-: rn any during the P04W wlil roirnburse the Public Entity for all Loss for Which the Public Entity shall be ,equlred PWW. B. The Company by law to indemnify the Insure" for any 0611 claim or claims first wrhten notice fo said claim reooty by the provided that the cisim is W made during the policy period Company during the poky P"40d. A, The convany A pay on behalf of the Public Entity All Loss which the Public Entity v 1 b 10GAthe oWigsled to pay for am' Civil claim or claims first mede against K beoauso of a Wrongful Act, Produring the claim is first made during the policy period and written notice of sWd claim is reamed by the Company policy period. II. DellWflone , or Unit, which Is Inly named in tMdit~ocl r*tY" s sha)l anct~e0al tlltutod the inoeptlon mental date of thIs Policy, B "Insured" shell msran, 1. the Pubtio Enflty; 2, all persona who were. now am or shall be lawfully •locted or lawfully appolnted officials and members of the Public Eftft; such Public 3. mombem of oommissions, boards or other units operating by and under ft wrisdkition Of lotch form, Entity and within an apps rnsnt of the total operating budget Indicated in the apPkA provided that the Insurance afforded shall not wend 10 aans 0t afuthow ing hospitals, utiIIM OUSE units unless specifically endorsad hereon; schools, goo*rfts or law smorowriont agencies; 4. employees as may be responsible to the Public Entity or to its commissions, boards or other units as eat forth In 13" above, provided that the Insurance afforded $hall not extend to any person g on a relalner or contro*lval agreement; Insolvency or bank 5, the estate or legal representative of Insureds In the vase 01 death, incompetenoy, ruptcy or such Insured. »en 4vn(w No -0-9 _U my Ar ern .r Itr ,eS .~Jr~ 1 or alleged error or mpsatatement Of misf~ang^t-a 0, "Wrongful Act" shalt mean a atlas sot of breach of duty In.~ misfeasance, malfeasance and noWSk"rrce.by--an Insured gs~ 1~ or omission or noO ~P a public official or employee of the PJW D. "Loss" shall mean the isimunt which the tinu Ire far~►Yte pty, lam oriclla mms maw gail~~ for Wro gful shah be required by law to pay as indemnity k and w4ena of Investigation and defense of legal Acts and"Include damages, ON I Cp oot ft s a of oiRclals or employees Of tine Public ar a0*" (ex0luding from such costs end e>~!tee file aa aridos ur similar bonds matters other governmental body), claims a sufta And appeals therefrom, oust of att ohmont, appeal provided always however, such sub~*ct of Lou shelf not include fines or penalties Imposed by law, or which may, be doomed uninsurablo under the law pureuaM to which this policy sotWe id~ and hood of this PoIICY such lesser period, L -1polley Perlod" shall mean the period of one year following the and of q the time between the effective date and the termination of the policy is less than one year, Iii' t~xf>1utFone of Lou in oonneotion with any claim: The Company shall not be liable to make any payment A. asking the return of any profit, advantage, gain or remuneration to which the Insured uass re p j~9enni 9gar+al y however, tthe Inwre;:Iis hha such lack~ot legal a~~+ the tenna of this policy entitled: of the insureds, however, not'vrlthstanding the foregoing. B, brought about or contributed to by the dine as to any claims upon whbh suit is brought the Insuredo shell be protooWd under the "a of this policy the insureds, u pose a judgment or other against them by room of any alleged dWW"sty on the part of deliberate Intent were ma~teria to the cause of a don dish tlnal m adjudication Insureds readysm to the ds with actual dishonest purpose that ty committed b by the to adJudloatedi 0, seekinq relief, or redress, In any form other than money damages; D. for bodily Injury, sickness, dtsease, death, mental anguish or lor claims loss arising use thereof by reason of the E. lot low, damage to or destruction of any tangible proWrtY or the W090ingi ess; F. for Injury arising from: 1. false arrest, assault cmat~n Inolud 8 W not Nm~ted to lit»! ailander ore olattilon otran~inuse dividual'soright 2, disparagart+snt, diets of privacy, 3, wrongful entry or eviction or other Invasion of the right of prWate oonupanCY: ~ Of telecasting the public E orrrelated to advertising, broa G. arlsing from a pv6iioatio beha`sfe in the course of activities oonduoted by or on mnstion and/or adverse pouesslon; H. arising from Inverse colds I, adaing from strikes, (lots or civil commotions; J, arising from the wllifui violation of any statute, ordinance or regul8tio committed by or with the knowledge or consent of any Insured; K arising from the discharge, dispomet, release or escopo of smoke, vapors soot, fumes, aokfa, Alkalis, tOxIO ohamicals, liquids or gases, waste materials or other Irritants, contemtnants or pollutants Into or ape land, the atmosphere or any watercourse or body of water; L. arising from the Insured's activities In a fiduciary capaoity; ntant, n the M. arising from a s of any aNorhowever, notwithstanding the ifortegoing, thegInsureds sh~ube protiscted soups Of his ptolerofessional duties; under the terms of this poiloy uoy a es to any claims made against them as Public Officials or Employees o the public Entity; 2 N. for a~` wrongful act date an neared kr iwor mto t ight reasonably Azpect that such wrongful act would give rise rip tto Wtv claim; kends NO, L°`-~~ . dv2W 0. arising out of breach of contract; hgenda Ilem ~126 R~ 4 - p. gdMV out of the activities of any law enforcement agency or personnel, RAO IV. Nuclear Rnergy 00111 l Exclusion it is agreed that the policy does not apply: 1. Under any Usbility Coverage, to Injury, sickness, disease, death or destruction. (a) with respect to which an Insured under the policy is also an Insured under a nuclear energy liability policy issued by Noolear Energy Uablllty Insurance Association, Mutual Atomic Energy liability Under. wrtters or Nuciear Insurance Association of Canada, or would be an Insured under any such policy bW for fie termination upon exhaustion of its limit of liability, or (b) resuMng from the hazardous properties of nuclear material and with respect to which (1) any person or organization Is required to maintain financial proteatlon pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, or any law amendatory thereof, or (2) the Insured Is, or had this policy not been issued would be, entitled to indemnity from the United States of Americ& or any agency thereof, under anyr oragga went entered Into by the United Slates of America, or any agency thereof, with arty perowr o 2, Under any Medical PaymMte Coverage, or under any Suppiemertwy Pay provision relating to Immediate medical of sufglcal relief, to expanses Incurred with respect to body injury, knees, disease, or death resultkng from the hazardous propert!w of nuclear material and arrieing out of the operation of a nuclear facility by any Persrm or organization. r 3. Under any Uabllity Coverage, to Injury, sickness, disease, death or desowtion resulting from the hazard. f} ous propar%s of nuclear material, 0. (a) the nuclear malarial (1) Is at any nuclear facility owned by or operated by or on behalf of, an Insured or (2) has been disoharged or dispersed thsrafrom; (b) the nuclear material Is contained In spent fuel or waste at any time possessed, handled, used, prw- ewed, stored, transported or disposed of by or on behalf of an Insured; or of alas disease, In conrnodestruction Owe out of the otion with the planning, construotif on bmaan Insured intenanco, of seriloss, (c) the aerials, parts sloXness, mat operation or use of any nuclear facility, but if such facility Is located within the United States of America, Its lerritorisa or possessions or Canada, this exotuslon (o) applies only to Injury to or destruction of property at such nuclear facility, 4. As used In this ewlfon "hazardous properties" Inoludoe radloactlve, toxic or exploslve properties; , "nuclear material" means source material, special nuclear moterlat or byproduct material; "source material", "special nuclear material", and "byproduct material" have the meanings given them In the Atomic Energy Act of 1054 or In any law amendatory theft; "spent fuel" means any fuel element or fuel component, solid or liquid, which has been used or exposed to radiation In a nuclear reactor; "waste" means any waste material (f) containing byproduct material and (2) resulting from the operation by any person or organization of any nuclear facility Included within the definition of nuclear facility under paragraph (a) or (b) thereof; "nuclear facohy" means (a) any nuclear reactor, (b) any equipment or devloe designed or used for (1) separating the Isotopes or uranium or plutoN. um, (2) processing or utilizing spent fuei, or (3) handling, processing or packaging waste, 3 njr.Ma Ma _ q.2 -O n for the processing. febr`catir'the custody +g or alloy`~f;v:~-- (o) any eopment or devto! used material N at any ome 4:•0 total amount 01 Stroh matadal M oontaifai'f4+ore~A7~3r ~ 7°9z or device IS located co m. Orr 2W gram of uranh~n~ premises where such equip 0cmbinatior+ tt>ere Or more tf►an X / a pivonium or vmnrum 223 or any A -41190 Of 235, used for the storage or dlsPotN exo9vatlon, premises W place prepared or (d) any mature, basin, of waste, a{ oonduoted on such the and all and includes the site on which any of the tore9o`n!; b located, ~ promises used for such oparatb~ r fusion In a Setf•aupport►ing own "nuclear reads" means any aPPW*~ dplgned used to susteJn nuclea roaow V to oontain a 0Wca1 mass of fissionable mateWt estruction o1 property tt» word "`nlry" or "desfsuotbn" `nd►fdes all loin,:; of With fospeat to Injury ry to to d of d""oily radioSOW'D contarn eh911 not be liable to make any latteewt for loss arislnp out of We W oCo r any nuclear reaction or explosionno matter where ft occurs or where Fl3RTHER oTo T,,F f ar y Ing wh A911E, t14 any radbacti~`ty the f*WK$ of It We eMeot• Y. Untlt of Ublllty • the deductible amount as get forth M Item 4 Of the peolaratbna The dedunftble amount Is to be borne by t repeated A Trill p0`ky Is only to pay the excess ° In respect of each and every Lost (as herein deout the same Wrongful Act or series of 00dnuous, as a Single Loaf and only one Insureds and is not to be `nwred• LOSS to amola)m or claims shall be construed or Interreiated Wrongful Aett gh'ing 0" ded4dblo amount Shall apply ~o• drog B The total: Habillty pftj company xfoceed the Lmttrot Lis" du$ led the Inptelm3Pot eriod the(Doolaraltione The not Disoovery Period, t. 0PP to {norease the Compsny'a Unlit of Liability. imolusfon herein 01 more than one tnwred shall not serve Vi. Defame Provielone claim or incur any 009U and expenW of {nvgtlgatlon A. The Inetreds shill not admit c1liability for or ptt{e any ,s written consent (w11io and/or h oon9ent Shalt A dalenee it, connection with any a1m without the Company Prior not be unreasonably vrhhhefd)• Nis the Invest~ya• 9 The company shall have the right but not the duty to assume, In 0% Oft&the 'do ~e bonand/Or defense of any claim and {n the event of the exerolsoof this +`ghtthe t to Section whh their full cooperation claim and the Inwreds refuse, thou wb}eo 0. If tM Company recommends settlement of any the amount of the SOWOment raoommended V, Limit Of LWlky, the Company 's HabIIHy for Loss shall not exceed by the Oompany and the costs and expense of Irrvestlgatlon and/or defense at of the time t the In indopedonttyrof t and t11a Insured than thereafter mege$at*, tmresNgsto and/or defend such claim or suit c ft"N. Vtl. Lose prevlelom Coatly relmburso the Insureds A. The CemPanY shall, during the Pendenoy of any .vas orveat►gs$A made, Period that In those InUon and detente of salts provided for that portion of Lou constst rIg of costs and exponee of licatbn of Exclusions A s,ld/or 13 the Insureds shall, on instances in which a final adIudloadon ytabllshes he O PP by the Company, return to the Company Any ~ 91 The limo whom a Lost shall be Incurred within the meaming of this Po{Icy shall be the date on which the tsurs4s shall give written noWS to the Company 49 hereinafter provided. Iva notice g.9 soon r nt io the insureds' rights under thlt Policy, g C. The insureds shall, as a oondkion P epode Intt the tnSUreds• vrsadceble to the Company of any claims roads aga ht is exercised by the Inwreds in 0. It during the Policy Period of during the Discovery Period the rig lance with Section VIII, Discery Period), the Insureds 911911; 4 Agenda No, (1) reooive written or oral notion from any third party that It is the intwftn of ~e Shied VIOZ ~ Insureds responsible for 0* results of any Wrongful Act; or ~<a .Ie,~ (2) become aware of arty occurronoe which may aubsequenty give rise to a Um belt r d;~e9ge Apt the Insureds as respocta any wrongful Act /a and provided that in either case tim Insureds give written notice to the Company during the Policy Period or dwing the Discovery Period, if appiloabia, of such written or oral notice under (t) above or wxh oecurrnnoo under (2) above, any claim which Is subsaquertffy made against the Insureds arising cut of such Wrongful Act shall, for tho purposes of this Policy, be treated as a claim during the Policy Period. E. The Insureds shall give the Company such Information and ooopersoon as it may reasonably require and as shall be In the Insureds' power. sill. 01soovery Period If the Company or the Insured camovis or non-rare" this Policy, the lr urreds shall have the right, upon payrr»nt of the additional premium of 26% of the total Polley premium hereunder, to an extension of the cover granted by this Policy In respeot of any oialm or claims first made against the Insureds and reported to the Company during the period of 12 months after the effective date of such cancellation or refusal to renew but only In respect of any Wrongful Act oommttt«f before the off ooWo date of such cancellation or refusal to renew and otherwise covered by this Policy, This right stall terminate, however, unless written notice of such election together with the additional premium due is reeetved by the Camp" not later than 30 days after the effective data of cancellation or refusal to renew, This clause and the rights contained herein shall not apply to any cancellation resulting from nonpayment of premium. tX. franoti{stion 01sues This Policy may be cancelled by the Insureds by surrender of this Policy or by giving written notice to the Company stating when thereafter such cancellation shall be effective, This Polley may also be oancelled by the Company by delivering to the insureds or by mailing to the Insureds by registered, certified or other first class mail, at the Insureds' address shown In Item I of to Declarations, wrYLten notice stating when, not lass than thirty (30) days thereafter, the cancellation shall be eHecW9, However, M the Company cancels the policy because the Insureds have failed to pay a premium when due, thin Policy may be oanoslled by the Company by malling written notice of cancellation to the Insured at the address shown in this Policy, stating when, not Ices than ten (10) days thereafter, such cancellation shat! be effective, The mailing of such notice as aforesaid shall be sufficlent proof of notloe and this Policy shall terminate at the time of surrandw or the data and hour .pecHled In such notloe, which shall become the end of the Policy Period If this Polley shall be cancelled by the Insureds, the Company shall retain the customary short rate proportion of the Premium hereon, if this Policy shall be cancelled by the Company, the Company shall retain the pro rata proportion of the premium hereon. Payment or tender of any premium by the Company shall not be a condition precedent to the effeotfvenT of cancellation, but such payment shall be made as soon as practioabls. If the period of limitation relating to the giving of notice Is prohibited or made void by any law controlling the oonstruotion thereof, such period shall be deemed to be amended so as to be equal to the minimum period of limitation perms tW by such law, X. Authorisation and Notioe BY aooeptancs of this Policy, all Insureds agree that the Publio En* shall act on behalf of all Insureds with respect to the giving and receiving of notice of claim or cancellation, the psyment of premiums and the receiving Of any return premiums that may become dub under this policy, and aoeepting any endorsement Issued to become a part of this policy, Notice sent to the Public Entity at the address shown In tho Declarations shall constitute notloe to ale Insureds, XI. aenerat 04nditions A, romtory This Poicy only appfles to claims or cults brought against the Insureds In the United States of Amodoa its territories or possessions, or Canada. S 8. Nob'co of palms ArlWa Item leJ All notiices of Balms, applications, demands or requosts provided for in this Palic~.bain ymi na_>~d2' addressed to the Company's Administrative Offices, 70 Pino Street, New York, New York 10270. C. Action A#&6st Company No aobon shaft tie against the Company unless, as a condition precedent thereto, the Insureds shall have fully compiled with all the terms of this Polley, nor until the amount of the Insureds' obligation to pay shall have been ffnelly detarmIned either by judgment against the Insureds after actual trial or by written agreement between the Insureds and the claimant, which agreement has been approved by the Company in accordance with Section VI, Defense Provisions. , Any person or organization or the legal representative thereof who has secured such judgment or written agreement shall thereafter be entitled to recover under this Policy to the extent of the Insurance afforded by th4 Policy, No person or organization shall haw any right under this Policy to join the Company as a party 10 any action against the Insureds to determine the Insureds' liability, nor shall the Company be Impleaded by the Insureds orthelr legal ropresentattves, Banknrptoy or Insolvency of the Insureds or of the Insureds' estato shell not relleve the Company of any of Its obligations horoundar, D. Mwpers and AcgWWWMs If, during the tern of this Policy, an Insured named in Item I of the Declarations shall to merged, consolidated or otherwise combined, immediate written notice must be given to the Company, Coverage hereunder shall not apply to any Wrongful Acts oommitted subsequent to the date of merger, consolidation or other combination unless the Company gives its consent In writing by endorsement to this Polley, &&Vsvon t:lawlt In the event of any payment under this Policy, the Company shall lire subrogated to all the Insureds' rights of recovery therefore against any person or organization, and the Insureds shall execute and dellver all instru• ments and papers and do whatever else to necessary to secure such rights for the Company, The Insureds shall do nothing to prejudice Euoh rights, Any amount recovered In excess of the Company's total payment shall be restored to the Insureds, lost the coat to the Company of recovery. F. tDtlltar fns*rtce Such Insurance as is provided under this Policy shall be excess over any other valid and colleotible Insurance, Q. Assonment This Policy shall be vold If assigned or transferred without the written consent of the Company, H. Conformity pause Terms of this Policy which are in conflict with the statutes of those states wherein certain provisions and covorag; Included under this policy are not permitted are hereby amended to cover only those provisions and coveregso as apply and cWorm to such statutes, GYtanpas Notice to any agent or knowledge possessed by any agent or by any otter person shall not effect a waiver or a change In any part of this Polley or estop the Company from asserting any right under the terms of this policy, not shall the terms of this Polley be waived or changed, except by endorsement Issued to form a part of this Policy. In witness whoreof, the Company has caused this Policy to be signed by lit Presk#ent and Secretary and cuuntersigned on the t;oiaratlons Pago by a duly authorized agent of the Company, * l11RI e+a+ary Mwrx 6 03/01/p2 14:34 04044904142 NATIONAL UNION' onda No, _ 11 003 This a oresment, effective forms a part of all lumber rssuWto by In consldor t on of the premium ohsrged, It is hereby understood and agreed that item a (3), Section ll, D"nltlons, of the Policy Insuring Agreements, is :mended to read as follows: SECTION ll DEFINITIONS ITEM B 3. members of commissions, boards of other units operating by and under the )udsdlcoon of such Public Entity and within an apportionment of the totai operatlng budget Indicated In the application form, provided that the Insurance ufforded shall not offend to any of the following boards, commissions or units unless specifically endorsed hereon: schools, airg"t transit authorities, hospitals, utilities (except for the water and waste water utilitief), housing suthoritlea or low enforcement agencies; e r j AUTHORIZED RHPRESENTATIVE SAWU PRINT Of FORM : POLLS r h 05/04/02 14; 34 04043004142 NATIONAL MON kpnda No. ~a -oa4 Agenda 11nm IRS,' II~IQIaBlSfIiAENTa► ~/I/~ ~~~a1a __~~7~~L Thir lndonameM, of &jve forma a pan of aoi v rnumber Issued to by In consideration of the premium charged, It is hereby understood and agreed that Section III of the policy entitled ExciuAlOns Is emended to Include the following. The Company shall not be liable to make any payment Of loss In connection with any claim; q) prising out of any awards of book salary; r) arising out of the operation of or activities of any schools, airports, transit authorities, hospitals, utllltiq (except for the water and wssta water utilities), housing authorities, law entoroement mantles and/or security agencies unless specifically endorsed heron; a) to any cross claims or counter claims brought by one Insured under this policy against another Insured; In addition Exclusion L Is amended to road as follows; L) arlsing from the Insured's actvitias In a tudielary capacity ea respects to any employes benefit plan. It further understood and agreed that the combined Limit of Usbility that the Insurer shall be hams for on any claim Involving this or any other valid or collectible National Union Fin Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Ps, policy shell be Ilmhod to the LImlt of Unbllfty stead in Item 3 of the Declarations Page, All other terms, conditions and exclusions shall remain the some :7 n &ENTATNE i? .i. CITY MCOUNCII i - oooo~aoaaaQO~o~oo pOO~ i a T QOO~ pp oD~ po C ~~,~~op r o v t ~ * 0~~ ~~d~CCDGG09~~~0 ALL00275\210.2& A003 No, Agondalien, ~ ORDINANCE NO. !U/ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION I OF' ORDINANCE 90-150 PROGT.DING RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE CITY COUNCIL OF DENTON, TEXAS; AMENDING PRESENTATIONS BY CITIZENS AND TIME LIMITS OF BUSINESS FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEi{AS, HEREBY ORDAINS? SECTION I. Section I of Ordinance No. 90-150 adopting Rules of Procedure of the City Council of Denton, Toxas, is hereby amended by the amendment of paragraph 6.4 entitled "Presentation by Citizens" and paragraph 6,5 entitled "Time Limits" which shall hereafter be and read as follows: 6.4 Presentation by gitizeDs: (a) Any person who wishes to place a subject on the Council agenda at regular City Council meetings shall advise the City Manager's office of that fact and the specified subject matter which he desires to place on the agenda no later than 5:00 p.m. Wednesday prior to the council meeting at which he wishes the designated subject to be considered. (b) Any person who wishes to address the council regard- ing an item that is on the Council's agenda for a regular or special meeting, shall complete a "request to speak" form asking to speak regarding the item and return it to the City Secretary before the Council considers the item. The Mayor will call upon the citizen to speak for no longer than three (3) minutes as that particular agenda item is considered by the City Council. The provisions of this paragraph do not apply to person appearing at a public hearing in response to an official agenda notice or publication. (c) Any person who wishes to address the Council at a public hearing shall complete a "request to speak" form and return it to the city Secretary before the applicabla hearing. The Mayor will call upon the citizen to speak for no longer than five (5) minutes. 6.5 Time Limitst Speakers before the council are re- quested to limit their remarks to five (5) minutes or less except for citizens speaking to a non-public hearing agenda item, for which presentations shall be limited to three (3) minutes or less. SECTION Il. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the kmida No~ Agenda 11cm jes wl a 14-~ validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the city Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declaring it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION Ill. That this ordinance shall become effective imme- diately upon its passage and approval, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRYO MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERSt CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCHt CITY ATTORNEY BY: Page 2 .e NS C ITY L=--=COUNCII lilt yam/ u LLLL N F i I 1 .1. 1'. ITT I, ~r III TIT I III - 6i I 1, IT r I } I IIIFI IIITI T 1 11 It 1. oo~0~Q009 0 pp0~00 . ~O p0~ : o QO ~ 4.~ OQ ~ pp~ QDOOOO~~aw~d~ ooO~O` ITI III TITIITII Ill TIT TIISIFII 11 Fit 1 1. 1 TI Ill I III I TI I ITT Ill y E ti r) Agenda No. Agonda I1om&°#--~~'~'' - Wle CITY of DENTON; TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager DATE: June 29, 1992 SUBJECT: AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) Recommendation. That the City Council approve a. resolution adopting a City ADA policy, Slim mary: The Americans with Disabilities Act becomes fully effective for public entities on July 260 1992. Section 35.106 of the Act requires a public entity to disseminate sufficient f, information to applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons to inform them of the rights and protection afforded by the ADA. As a minimum, Cities must make available to the public the following: transition plan, self-evaluation checklist, grievance procedures, and an ADA coordinator, The City of Denton will make available a binder with the following sections to satisfy ADA requirements: Section I city Policy Section II Synopsis of the ADA 1 i Section III ADA Self-Evaluation Checklist Section IV Transition Plan Section V Therapeutic Recreation Program Res ct£ul y bmitted- 'I Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared By: `yn cx~. L P~c~ etcb L~ti Max Blackburn Risk Manager Approved: t I J h F, McGrane xeeutive Director of Finance 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 4342528 ii AFF00182 Agenda No, Anen is Ifem_ ,E S to RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ADOPTING A POLICY IN SUPPORT OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, in 1991, the City of the City of Denton, Texas created, an ADA Task Force to provide technical assistance and support to implement the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA); and WHEREAS, the City of Denton supports and endorses the letter and spirit of the ADA as passed by the United States Congress and signed into law by the President; and WHEREAS, the ADA recognizes the isolation, discrimination and segregation of persons with disabilities; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton has rights of persons ithdisabil ties provided rbyaSe tiosupported 04 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973; and WHEREAS, the compliance date for implementation is now in effect; NOW THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION I The following policy, attached hereto and made a part hereof is hereby adopted as an official policy of the City of Denton, Texast "Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Policy" SECTION II. The foregoing policy is attached hereto and made a part hereof and shall be filed in the official records with the City Secretary. SECTION IIr• The City of Denton will take necessary admin- istrative and budgetary actions to support the development of a system of services, programs and facilities that ensures the equality, dignity, and civil rights of individuals with disabili- ties. SECTION IV. The City of Denton urges the private sector and all citizens to ensure that individuals with disabilities enjoy full and equal access to all services, programs, facilities, and opportunities in all places of business covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act. SECTION VI That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approved. Agenda iton~,~ PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR i ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY i BY: i APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY I BY: 3 I 'r .I Page 2 h~arufaficm_~S ~'/,c/ CITY OF DENTON Page 1 of 2 POLICY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE SECTIONt PERSONNEL/EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 142FEEtENCE NO, t SUBJECTS IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) EFFECTIVE DATEt TITLEi AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) REFLACESi Policy Statement: It is the policy of the City of Denton to provide equal access to all City sponsored services, programs, and activities for citizens and employees with disabilities, as provided by the "Americans with Disabilities Act" of 1990, 42 U.S.C. S 12101, et seq., as the same may be amended from time to time (the ADA). The City will not discriminate against a "qualified individual with a disability", as this term is defined by the ADA, with regards to job applications, hiring, advancement, discharge, compensation, training and other terms, conditions and privileges of employment. The City will make reasonable modifications and accommodations in policies, practices, and procedures to ensure equal access; will provide auxiliary aids and services when necessary to provide effective communication and, will operate its programs so that, when viewed as a whole, those programs are readily accessible to, and useable by, individuals with disabilities. Administrative Frocedures: 1. The City Manager shall appoint members to the "City ADA Com- mittee" to: ensure policy training and implementation, assist in making reasonable accommodation decisions where the accommodation will not result in a hardship to the City, provide a forum for reviewing grievances, and act as a source of information on ADA for the employees of the City of Denton. Membership of the City ADA Committee shall be as follows: the Risk Manager, one representative from the Personnel Depart- ment, from the Fire Department, from the Engineering Depart- ment, from the Parke and Recreation Department, from the Plan- ning Department, from the Police Department, and two represen- tatives from the Utilities Department, in making recommenda- tions, the Committee shall use due diligence to obtain input or advice from not less than one community member who has a disability. II. The City Manager shall appoint an ADA coordinator who will serve as the ADA committee Chairperson. Questions concerning general ADA policy, reasonable accommodations, and grievances Fs Apanda No.. ~rz~ D Agenda Rom_L a Dalo - by citizens or employees not resolved by Department shall be directed to the ADA Coordinator for resolution. The ADA Co- ordinator shall convene the ADA Committee, as required, to resolve issues or make recommendations to Departments, the City Manager or the city council, as appropriate. III. In order to be qualified for a City position, an applicant must have the skills, experience and knowledge as reflected by the essential functions of the position with or without reason- able accommodation. inquiries regarding preemployment or em- ployment procedures, interviews, and hiring shall be directed to the Personnel Department for resolution. supervisor train- ing will be conducted by the Personnel Department as required to educate the supervisors of the requirements of. Title I of the ADA. IV. The Building ?Inspections Division will, prior to issuing a building permit, advise applicants of the need to comply with the requirements of Title III of the Americans with Disabil- ities Act. V. All supervisors are responsible for continually monitoring and evaluating current policies, procedures, facilities and pro- grams to achieve and maintain compliance with this policy. AFF00182 p E; 4. J:E 1 CITX ` COUNCIL T~ ~ano4floaa ~o 000~00~ o r n e y~~oc0 ox D 0 O~ ro l * * ~,00~ 0~~~~ 4 C C Q G C 6 4 4~ boo. . A2entlaNn. ~~oav ApWa Rem._ toile C,t_y Coutic%1__lteport,__L?ormEit, U To: Playor and Members of the City Council Carom; Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager Date: June 24, 1992 Subject: TUITION REIMBURSEMENT POLICY RECOMMENAAT:TON: It is recommended that the City of Denton consider approval of a resolution adopting a personnel policy revising tuition reimbursement, and providing an effective dale of passage, that will apply to all requests for tuition reimbursement submitted for courses completed after September 1, 1992, SUMMAILY: Due to increased participation and costs associated with tuition, it has be.comc necessary to snore closely monitor guidelines for sharing in the cost of tuition reimbursement for city employees, The proposed changes to the policy will streamline administration of the program, and place limitations on the number and types of courses that the City will provide rei,tnbursement for. BACKGROUND: In 1986, the City Council adopted the current personnel policy authorizing the City to share in the cost.,,-.4 of approved courses and educational programs for city employees. Currently, 138 employees are participating in tuition reimbursement tit, an es Lima Led annual cost of $14,100,00, This represents cr 600% increase in employee participation as well as a 250% increase in reimbursement cost; associated with the program since the current po).icy was adopted. If the City Council appvove~, the rasoLution adopting the new tuition reimbursement policy, Lhe Followini; would occur: The level of reimbursement is limited to those courses of study related to a City career field and to two courses (eight semester hours) per semester, for a total of 32 semester hours per year, Reimbursement is limited to payment for tuition and mandatory fees, Ltc,i.mbursen,ent rates (i.e. 100%, 80%) are established as part of the budget process based upon the availabi.lit,v of funds and not, to exceed the current tuition and mandatory fees charged by the University of North Texas or 'texas Woman's University (whichever i.s greal,or). Applicatien for LniLion reimbursement wouid be considered cis part of the budget, pvoce.',;s. Any employee detii.ring to apply for. Luit,ion re imbuvsemcwnL Weilld bV rectuir0 cl to nntif}' heir supervisor of the ant ;ic•,ipated number of crOdi-L hours Lo be z 1gond3 AQonda Council Report For maL.\Tuitioil Reimbursement Page 2 - June 2d, 1992 reimbursed during the budget year, The supervisor would forward to the Director of Human Resources, a memorandum signed by the Supervisor and endorsed by the Department Director. The memorandum will list all employees requesting tuition reimbursement and total. number of anLic'i-paten credit, hours for each employee during the budget year. The submission deadline for forwarding this request will also be designated in the budget calendar. Changes have been made to the administrative procedures for City implementation of tuition reimbursement. The completed TulLion Reimbursement Agreement form, would be submitted only once, at the initial application for reimbursement, Any student; who maintains a "continuous enrollment" status would not be required to reapply. All, employees would coml'r)ete a Tuition Reimbursement Registration Card prior to the start of each semester) stating ells*,ib.le courses and associnted credit (tours, Regintration Cards submitted after the beginning of the semester would not be accepted for reimbursement consideration. Actual payment, of reimbursements would be made three times it year in January, ,tune, and Sopt:ember, upon receipL of an original grade transcript and evidence of employee payment, FI{(l(IRAMS~_PIMA RTMl?.N['SG320t11?S-Al'FE.C'PFII); Approval of the Tuition Reimbursement policy will affect a.l.l. fu11- time City employees) emp] oyed for six months, eligible to participate in the educational assistance program, ETS(:A IM1?A911' Council approved $8,000 For tuition reirnbursemenL for the 1991/92 fiscal year, Due to Lramendous demand and increses in tuition raLes, a budget transfer from the City Manager's contingency Fund in the amount of $6,100, was made in February 1992, to meet the anticipated reimbursement needs L111°011911 the SnrnmCr 11 s0ntester) 1992, Based on antic'ipatecl degree completion, increased participation, and increased tuition costs, it, is anticipated that $1,11100, will meet: reimbursement, requirements for 1992/93 fiscal year, file 92/93 proposecl funding level w111. stay at the 1991/92 level.. Respectfully Submittedt l,Ioyd Narre1.1 City Manager i ir:•s a-sr:. t I it Agonda No. Agenda Iteot~S'_'~~~' - Nio___~~ 2_ .2 Council. Report. FormatV'fuition Reimbursement Page 3 - June 2,1, 1992 Prepared Ley; A4ilivv, Thomas . K:linck Ii Director Fct or Human Resources Department Muni Svc/Economic Development \cprtuit2.mem ji N ;r ALL00283\1410,17h Aonnda No. Aponda Rnm__.~~ Wto _1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING REVISIONS TO THE PERSONNEL POLICY RELATING TO TUITION REIMBURSEMENT; AND PRO.77.DING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the director of the Personnel/ Employee Relations Department for the City of Denton has presented a proposed policy regarding certain employee rules and regulations for the Council's consideration; and WHEREAS, it is the policy of the City of Denton to improve City services by encouraging upward mobility and employee devel- opment and excellence of performance by sharing costs of approved college cours;:s and educational programs; and WHEREAS, based upon the recommendation of the City Manager, the city council desires to revise the existing policy on employee tuition reimbursement, adopted by the Council on November 5, 1985; THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION I. The following policy, attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby adopted as an official policy of the city of Denton, Texas: - Tuition Reimbursement (Reference No. 107.09) SECTION II. The foregoing policy is attached hereto and made a part hereof and shall be filed in the official records of the city of Dentor, with the City Secretary. SECTION III. The policy entitled "Tuition Reimbursement" adopted by Resolution on November 5, 1985, is hereby rescinded, provided however, that said policy shall apply to all requests for tuition reimbursement submitted for courses completed prior to September 1, 1992. SECTION IV. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its passage and approval, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: s fZE~~E{'JE LIOFI CI pEf "0 CIu 999?. jt H 23 NI fa 20 t Ao~qda No, Agenda item D1to APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCHO CITY ATTORNEY BY: I 'r I i i Page 2 WV4 i!- - !p'J iti.'t r?S1 ifEE:c IVED r,Il"j, 0 f' 1)rNT0H PEWFMI iEL 1992 JUN 23 del 10; 20 i i i i i c i I i Arlonda PJo.._,_,(,~ w.Qr~Q. A~entlallem._~.~,1 MEMORANDUM TO, BeI;Ly McKean, Executive Director Municipal. Services/Economic Development FROM: Thomas W. Klinck, Director Personnel/Employee Relations DATE: June 11 1992 SUBJECT: Tuition Reimbursement Betty, as you are already aware, we have experienced a tremendous increase in participation for the Luit.ion reimbursement program, since its adoption in 1986. Due to an increase in participation and an increase in Luition costs, iL has become necessary revise the guidellnes for reimbursemennt. I am proposing wo make tho following changes to the current Tuition Reimbursement Policy: Application for tu:i.tion reimbursement, along with appropriate degree plan documentation shall be submitted to the Personnel Department 30 calendar days prior to enrollment. As long as an employee maintains tho status of "continuing student", he/she will not be required to rrapply each somester. A Tuition Reimbursement. RegisLrat:ion Form must. be completed prior to Lhe start; of the semester. Registration Forma submitted after the start; of a semester will not bc; considered for reimbursement. Reimbursement :is limited to t:hoso courses of study rotated to a City career field. (Se(' attached List..) Re.imbu7-moment; is ltmiLed Lo two courses (eight credit; hours) per semester, for a maximum of 32 credit hours per y0ar. Tuition reimbrtr8emonl; will be paid Lhroe Limes a year in Lhe monl;hs of January, June, and :leptember. Employees are required to notify their DeparLine nt of' an Intent to apply for tuition reimbursomenL as part. of Lhe budget process. the notification will include an anticipated number of crodit; hours to be submitted for reimbursement during the budget year. Prior to l6 days from Lhc end of a sr,,aster, partic pauLs must submit. tin orig:Ina.l grade report, a..d evidence of. employoc payment, Lo bo coneldered for reimbursement. s ! Aperida Date MRMORANDl1M\Tuition Reimbursement Page 2 June 1, 1992 We are recommending that the proposed policy be considered I'LL the July 7, 19923 City Council Meet.i.ngt with an immediate effective date. Reimbursements roquested for both 1992 summer semesters will be reimbursed in accordance with the current Tuition 14..jmbursement Policy. An analysis of past participation in tuition reimbursement demonstrates that. employees who are taking advantage: of the tuition reimbursement: benefit are, for the most por1,1 tenured City employees. Tuition reimbursement serves as art important benefit, for recrui.Ling and retaining quality employees and contributes toward meeting the City's mission of providing yual.ity service. Please feel free i;o cont,act me about, any questions or concerns regarding this matter, Thomas W, K-1-inck to 1. t,ce . ,jull 6/28/92 rjph Agonda No. 2-U ~ Agenda Itum_!~S CITY OF DENTON PAGE J. OF_ 1)31o - 7~ POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE !J SECTION: REFERENCE NUMBER: HUMAN RESOURCE DEPARTMENT SU81ECr: EFFECTIVE DATE; EMPLOYEE BENEFITS AND SERVICES TrrLM REPLACES: TUITION REIMBURSEMENT POLICY STATEMENTr It is the purpose of the City of Denton to provide quality services for its citizens by encouraging upward mobility, employee development, and excellence of performance by sharing the expense of approved courses and educational programs. A course or educational program will be defined as a class of instruction taught at or by an aocredited college, university, or trade school and that meets on a regular basis over an extended period of time. The availability of tuition reimbursement is subject to City Council approved funding levels. Tuition reimbursement levels will be established annually as part of the Budget process based upon anticipated participation and available funding. To be eligible for consideration of tuition reimbursement, an individual must-be a regular full-time employee and have completed at least six months service with the City prior to application approval. Courses offered by accredited colleges, universities, or trade schools are eligible for tuition reimbursement subject to-the following: o the completed Tuition Reimbursement Agreement along with documentation similar to a degree plan shall be submitted to the Human Resources Department at least 30 calendar days before enrollment; o the course of study shall be related to a city career field as determined by the Director of the Human Resources Department; o the maximum reimbursement shall not exceed the equivalent amount reimbursed to employees attending either the University of North Texas or Texas Woman's University (whichever is greater), and is limited to reimbursement for two courses (eight evetitt hours each semester) and not to exceed 32 semester hours each year. Seminars and conferences will not be eligible for tuition reimbursement. Approval for reimbursement for seminars and conferences is subject to Departmental training budgets. Courses not directly job related nor on an approved degree plan are ineligible for tuition reimbursement. Approval for reimbursement for these courses is subject to Departmental training budgets. If an employee resigns or is terminated for any reason prior to course completion, the City shall not be obligated to reimburse any part of the expense. APP001D4 Mae !j ~i e: n f Apanda Ilont_ les PAGE _2 OF 4 ~IH POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (continued), TrrLE; REFERENCE NUMBER: TUITION REIMBURSEMENT Only those employees with an approved degree plan will be considered for tuition reimbursement. Employees must provide the Human Resources Department with evidence of an approved degree plan in a course area intended to broaden their knowledge of their current position or to prepare them for possible assumption of new job responsibilities within the city, in order to be eligible. An employee shall receive reimbursement for only one degree at each level (undergraduate, graduate and advanced graduate). An employee who leaves the city service lase than two years after completion of the reimbursed course must return the monies to the City upon termination. Employees terminated due to a reduction in force shall not be required to reimburse the monies. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES: The City will participate in the cost of those courses which are: -required by a degree plan which is related to a City career fields or -required by a trade school course of study which is related to a City career field. The costs of only the courses and educational programs which prior to registration have been reviewed by the employees supervisor and department head and approved by the Human Resources Department shall be eligible for reimbureement. Employeue enrolled in a degree program must submit the following itema: o a degree plan, o a statement of career goals, o a receipt outlining tuition costs. Employees seeking reimbursement for technical training must submit the following items to the Human Resources Department prior to registration: o a description of the program, o documentation equivalent to a degree plan, o cost of the program, o a letter stating long term career goals, o a receipt outlining tuition costs. The Institution must be accredited by an appropriate accrediting agency. Non-credit continuing education courses containing the same or similar information as received in previous courses (repeat courses) an well as credit obtained under the College Level Examination Program (CLEF) are not eligible for tuition reimbursement. Tuition reimbursement will be paid only once for each approved course. The City will not pay tui eon reimbursement for courses for which tuition reimbursement has already been received by the employee. APP001D4 .v wc;> rL SfSN~ V,,.1, RECEIVED CITY O OE ifl'OH PERSONNEL 092 JUN 23 0110: 20 AgendJ ltem~_S PAGE ,3_OF 4 0310 POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (continued) TTCLE: REFERENCE NUMBER: TUITION REIMBURSEMENT Reimbursement will be provided when a grade of "C" or above is achieved in college undergraduate courses, and a °B" or above in college graduate courses. For those courses or training programs for which grades are not aceigned (Pass/Fail), a certificate of completion will serve as proof of course completion. original official grade slips and transcripts are the only acceptable documentation of course completion for college earned credit courses. copies will be made and original grade slips and transcripts will be returned to the employee. Upon completion of the course, it shall be the responsibility of the employee to furnish official grade slips, transcripts and certificates as proof of course completion. No payment will be made until the employee has furnished satisfactory evidence of having completed the course. The City will pay the costs of tuition according to the following schedules: courses required by an approved degree plan and courses directly related to an employee's job duties will be reimbursed according to the provisions below. o Employees who attend state and/or County or accredited private colleges or universities shall be reimbursed at the rate established as part of the Budget process based upon the availability of funds and not to exceed the current tuition and mandatory fees charged by the Universit!, of North Texas or Texas Woman's University (whichever is greater). Mandatory fees shall be considered as part of the tuition rate charges. Books, supplies, lab fees, parking fees or other expenses in connection with courses to be taken are not eligible for reimbursement. The City will not pay the cost of tuition which has been or shall be paid from other sources such as scholarships, grants, Veterans benefits or other subsidies. In the event of partial scholarship or grant, reimbursement will be based on the actual expense to the employee but shall not exceed the amount established in maximum reimbursement schedule. Tuition Reimbursement will not be granted for auditing courses. Tuition Reimbursement will be paid from a non-departmental fund three times a year in the months of January, June, and September. The Human Resources Director may on behalf of the Executive Committee approve and authorize reimbursement. 1. Application Process A. Employees are required to notify their suparvisor of an intent to apply for Tuition Reimbursement and an anticipated number of credit hours to be reimbursed during the budget year, at a date designated as part of the budget calendar. The supervisor will forward to the Director of Human Resources, a memorandum, signed by the supervisor and endorsed by the Department Director, stating all employees requesting Tuition Reimbursement, and the APP001D4 er..raca. f RECEIVED CITY OF DENTON FCW'12100'LI_ 1997 JUN 23 All 10: 20 E ~i 1 ncdandd No. Ahenda Ilem~ ~~._T PAGE _4 OF 4 W10 POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (continued) TRLS: REFSRANCS NUMAER; TUITION REIMBURSEMENT total number of anticipated credit hours for each employee. The submission deadline for forwarding this request will be Included at a date designated in the budget calendar. Any exceptions to these time requirements must be approved by the Director of Human Resources. B. Employees must obtain a Tuition Reimbursement Agreement and Tuition Reimbursement Policy (Exhibit A) from the Human Resources Department. The completed Tuition Reimbursement Agreement must be submitted to the Human Resources Department 30 calendar days prior to scheduled course registration. A current degree plan (or comparable documentation) showing evidence of courses related to a city career field, must be submitted to the Human Resources Department with the first registration and kept on file for validation of courses. C. Any change to a degree plan must be submitted to and approved by the Human Resources Department prior to registration for a non-approved course. D. Employees must obtain a Tuition Reimbursement Registration Form from the Human Resources Department. The completed Registration Form will document the course titles and number of credit hours for which the employee intends to register. The completed Tuition Reimbursement Registration Form must be submitted to the Human Resources Department Relations Department prior to the start of the semester. E. Upon course registration, an employee will submit a copy of his/her school registration form to the Human Resources Department. F. As long as an employee maintains the status of "continuing student", he/she will not be required to reapply each semester. However, he/she must comply with Application Process steps D and E each semester. II. ,FEE REIMBURSEMENT: The employee will pay all costs. At the end of the semester, the employee will submit payment receipts, and original grade reports to the Human Resources Department for approval. All receipts are due within 15 days of the end of the school term. Payment for tuition reimbursement will be made three times yearly. The employee will be reimbursed based upon the actual fee schedule of the school they are attending. APP001D4 4*ii!nf~~ b: t IP,ctitiu4l l~ L'ti tnd • a RECEIVED CITY ?f= OEW'ON F EIR'S I IF L. P92 JUN 20 AM 10: 20 a' O ?D 4arida No. TUaT~QN ~Z~LMBUFiSEML:N`T' REG1:S'FFA9 rd NAME: DIVISION: _JOB TITLE: CHECK ONE: UNDERGRADUATE--_ - ---GRADUATE: _ PROGRAM MAJOR:.-_ DEGREE PLAN ON b"ILE:------- COURSE(S): DAYS: TIMES: CREDITS: Employee's Signature The above named employee has notified this Department of an intent to pursue course work and to request reimbursement for costs associated with tuition and fees, in compliance with the Tuition Reimbursement Program and Policy. The employee is aware and acknowledges that any reimbursement received fur this period shall be repaid to the City of Denton by deduction said amount from the employee's final check if the employee leaves City service on or before two years from the completion of the course(s). Department Director's Signature i ~j ~`UYT~gN REZMBU>IZSEMFNZ' AGRI~~~J`r~--S ~~°u nil - - .2 This Agreement is entered into vn the day of 199__betwoen 46 3 City of Denton ("Emplcyer") and UtploYee" I The parties declare the following: 1.) The City of Denton has instituted an educational incentive benefit program and policy which provides tuition reimbursement for regular, full time employees attending educaLiona.l institutions accredited by the State of Texas. A copy of Lhis policy is attached as "Exhibit A" and made a part of Lhis agreement for all purposes; 2.1 The Employee has read the attached document and by signing this agreement is hereby notifying City officials of it desire to pursue course work under this program; and 3.) The City officials respnnsible for administering the program will approve the requested course work for reimubursement if a grade as specified under said program and policy is achieved and if all other conditions under said program and policy are met, As set forth above, both parties agree as follow,: 1.) Emplovee agrees to comply with all Lerins and provisions of the attached document , City Personnel Policy No. 107.09, marked as "Exhibit A" as if all such terms and provisions were reprinted herein. L.) Employee agrees to comply with all terms and provisions of Lhe attached documenL marked as "Exhibit A" wliich states: An Employee who leaves the C.iLy service less, than two years after completion of the reimbursed course must return the funds to the city upon termination. Employee further oxpressly agrees and consents that if' the Employee leaves the City service less than two years after completion of a course for which reimbursement was made, the City will deduct the the reimbursement amount due and owing from F,mployec's final paycheck. Employee shall sign and deliver, to the City of Denton lluman Resources Department an Authorization of payment. authorizing 1.110 deduction from Employee's final paycheck. This Authorization will include any amount due and owing to the City for not Navin; fulfilled the Lwo-year requirement for receiving tuition reimbursement, ruiner this program, tuition refmhttrseuient under this program. 1N WITNESS W11FREOF, the partica: to this AgrecmenL have hereto set. t.heIr hands, executed the daite ~tnd year first, above written, CITY ON DENTON (Employer) Employee Name (Typed) Employee Signature i a ~i i r:. CITY COUNCI' oooooaQaooooooG~ooOO 00 , N a o~ °O 0 °lot , OCR ~G,v .y r j' ; JO <t : Nenda No. ApontlnIle m fX~le 2' CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT (A7 41 Ide / a TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Arco Electric Substation Land Acquisition E 0 ENDATION; Approve resolution authorizing the right-of-way agent to accept the conveyance of a 0.4053 acre tract of land from the Texas Municipal Power Agency 5UMMAR The Electric Department will utilize this tract as an electric substation site. This site is necessary to maintain the elcctri; distribution power servico in the eastern part of Denton. BACKGROUND: The site has been appraised by an independent real estate appraiser. The consideration being paid to T.M.P.A. is the appraised value and the fee charged by the appraiser, PROGRAMS, DEPARTM~FT$, OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Department FISCAL IMPACT: Perpetual maintenance as part of City of Denton electric distribution power system AEE00185 r f C ti tl ;t ra ALL0027F\1636.ea A0 ndiNo. _ U2 Apenda itvnt [e~ 0alo RESOLU'ION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON AUTHORIZING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AGENT TO ACCEPT THE CONVEYANCE OF A 0.4053 ACRE TRACT OF LAND IN THE MORREAU FORREST SURVEY A-417, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION I, That the Right-of-way Agent is authorized to accept the conveyance of a 0.4053 acre tract of land in the Morreau Forrest Survey A-417, Denton County, Texas, by special warranty deed, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated, from the Texas Municipal Power Agency. 2ZQTION II. That the Right-of-way Agent is directed to cause the special warranty deed to be recorded in the Real Property Records of Denton County, Texas, upon its acceptance. SECTION III. That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM; DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY 0 BY: ii Agmda Ilom.~sq C Ralo SPECIAL WARRANTY Deco Date1 Grantors Texas Municipal Power Agency, A Municipal Corporation Grantor's Mailing Address (including county)i P.O, Box 7000 Bryan, Brazos County, Tx 77805 Granlsae City of Denton Grantee's Mailing Address (including county)e 215 East McKinney Street Denton, Denton County, Texas 76201 Considerationi Ten Dollars and other Good and Valuable Consideration Property (including any improvements)e ALL that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land situated in the Morreau Forrest Surrey A-417 Denton County, Texas and nine being a part of a tract shown by deed from James H. Russell, Jr., Trustee to Texas Municipal Power Agency dated July 23, 1980 and recorded in Voluae 10270 page 165 Deed Records and being more partiouaarly described as followse BROWNING at ■n iron pin found at the northwest corner of said Texas Municipal Power Agency (T,M.P.A.) tract THENCE south 00 05' 30" Hest with the west line of said T,M.P.A, tract a distance of 103.87 feet to a point for a corner THENCE south 89. 59' 54' east and passing a steel fence corner post at 3.6 feet and continuing with a fence and passing another steel fence corner post at 169s54 feet and continuing a total distance of 170.07 feet to a point in the east line of said T,N,P,A, tract] THENCE north 00 05' 30" east a distance of 109,75 feet to an iron pin found at the northeast corner of said T.M.P.A. tract THENCE north 89' 57' 30" west a distance of 170.07 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 0,4053 acres of land. Reservations from and Exceptions to Conveyance and Warrantye None Grantor, for the consideration and subject to -the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance and warranty, grants, sells, and conveys to Grantee the property, together with all and singular the rights and appurtenances thereto in any wise belonging, to have and hold it to Grantee, Grantee's heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns forever. Grantor binds Grantor and Grantor's heirs, executors, administrators, and successors to warrant and forever defend all and singular the property to Orontes and Grantee's heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the name or any part thereof, except so to the reservations from and exception to conveyance and warranty, by through, or under Grantor, but not otberwfse. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. AEEOOOBE - _ _ ~ „rarrsra !I\ 1~J1~ it i~ 1 I Apen6a Ilom_ S~/~L1, Teens Muniolnsl poxer Agency 8Yl VV Ed Wagoner STATE OF TEXAS Executive Di ctor/General Manager COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before ■e on the aC 7 1992, by day of R•^ 410 WANDL24, AHAM y Yubllo, state of Texas MY EDREI Als5 Accepted this day of Denton, Texas (Resolution no. 91-073) 19 for the City of BYI Roger N. Wilkinson Right-of-May Agent i A b1 ~ H i~ b O rl O ~p Q At 0 W H A Is U n dF V OQ~N~ H U E r CITY COUNCII 'f~TY 1 bra rrr- 0ooooop4ooaQa Qoooo ...y. 0 0 0 c s~ pp Q v y-+yj'''~~ 0 15% o a, t e * oo~oo ~~CCCOurO~n~~ } AUanda No. -(.~~.D AUonda Ilom s J~ CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council. O v FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager DATE: July 7, 1992 SUBJECT: Street Closing Request for Pearl Street, from Carroll to Denton, for a block party on Saturday, July 18, 1992 RECOMMENDATION: To temporarily close Pearl Street, from Carroll Boulevard to Denton Street, on Saturday, July 18, from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. for a neighborhood block party. SUMMARY: Laura Davis, representing the neighborhood, has requested that the street be closed to provide adequate space and safety for those attending a neighborhood block party. The property owners or tenants affected by this closure have signed the attached petition. One owner is on vacation and her signature is not on the petition. However, verbal permission was obtained from all residents before the event was planned. No owner or tenant will be denied access to their property during the event. Both the Police Chief and Fire Chief have been advised of this event and have no safety concerns with this temporary street closure. Please advise if I can provide additional information. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, C 1 yd 'V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: Catherine E. Tuck Administrative Assistant ,i q kjnnrla.`Jo. Jot X hr Aoenda lei) lS ~I Ul:o l- v`" REQUEST FOR S'rI:kMMT CLOSURE Organization Requesting Street Closure: W Contact Person: Address: A! C' Phone Number; 11 Street To Be Closed: -f,;t')O I ' Date and Time To Be Closed:-fit-{ 01 Intersecting Streets: : y l tn~ Reason For Closure: I( 4-, 1 Please complete the lower portion of this form. tenants affected by the street closure MUST be contacteALL ro owners and/or U and mustysign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure, Name of Property Owner/ Address Tenant of Pro rt Authorized Favor/ S1 nature oppose 41 fi jt-e,le' " Vii. ) /r,j7~>, y % 3. S %U r 4 ~ Gin n - rv >~',T n $ , C -,4C I i /I c blcK 6. QG. e1 ; C 1 - (A '00q . / if 10. J7 AMMOOOFC ft Ej aQ_- Agwidi Ilam_ REQUEST FbR STREE7T CLt7SURE Qrganization Requesting Street Closure; Contact Person:., Address: Phone Number: Street To Be Closedr Date and Time To Be Clos,ee~: Intersecting streets i Reason For.Closure: ` Please complete the lower portion of this form. ALL property owners and/or tenants affected by the street closure Kus be contacte3 and must sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure. Name of Property Owner/ Address Authorized e nt. of Property -0i nature OFavor/ ppose L 17/ 1 T 6.- 7. 8. 9. 10. AMMOOOFC AAAOOA79 A{londa No. Apenda 1Icfin. S 1 Ua1n _._._1 " _ 2.. RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY CLOSING PEARL STREET BETWEEN CARROLL BOULEVARD AND DENTON STREET ON SATURDAY, JULY 18, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 19921 AND WHEREAS, Laura Davis, on behalf of her neighborhood, as evidenced by the signed petition of the residents living on either side of the affected-street, is requesting that Pearl Street, from its intersection with Carroll Boulevard to its intersection with Denton Street, a public street within the corporate limits of the City of Denton, Texas, be temporarily closed to public vehicular traffic between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8t00 p,m, on July 18, 1992, for the purpose of having a neighborhood block party; and WHEREAS, Laura Davis, has assured the City that the property owners and tenants in this area will not be denied access to their properties as a rrasult of the temporary closing of this road, and that they have agreed to the temporary closing of this roadl and WHEREAS, in order to provide adequate space for the said fund- raising event and in order to protect the safety of citizens who, attend, the city Council of the City of Denton deems it is necessary to temporarily close a portion of Pearl Street between Carroll Boulevard and Denton Street from the hours of 8800 a.m. until 8100 p.m, on Saturday, July i8, 19921 NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION , , That Pearl Street, from its intersection with Carroll Boulevard to its intersection with Denton Street, a public street within the corporate limits of the City of Denton, Texas, be temporarily closed to vehicular traffic from the hours of 8:00 mom. to 8300 p.m, on July 18, 19920, for the purpose of having a neighborhood block party. SECTION rr, That the City Manager shall direct the appro- priate City Department to erect barricades on Pearl Street from the intersection of Carroll Boulevard to its intersection with Denton street, at 8300 mom. and to have the same removed at etOO p.m. on said data. "Qua-111 - That this resolution shall become effsotive immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992. BOB CASTLEB- E R -XAXOR k, 1 Wto ATTESTi JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY ' BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH,'CITY ATTORNEY BY i • 1 c 1 i I i Page 2 -ta i~ HANDOUT TO COUNCIL 7-7-92 r CITY of OENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 M E M O R A N D U M TO$ BETTY NO1(EAN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL SERVICES/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FROMi NONIE BULL, MANAGER OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DATEi JULY 7, 1992 SUBJECTS ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH BUDGET SCENARIO FOR FULL RECOVERY In response to council Member Chew's request, the attached information details the schedule of fees necessary to make the Environmental. Health budget 100-034-0039 self supporting. In summary, the existing food establishment permit fee will have to be increased by $50.00 (which is a 90.9% increase) along with the implementation of a reinspection which will amount to one-half the original annual inspection fee. Please let me know if you need further information. 1 Non a ull Mana r of Environmental Health Services ABBOOOE7 ATTACHMENT 8171666.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2629 a fi Ff FOOD ESTABLISHMENT PERMIT FEES ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH JULY 1f 1992 NUMBER NUMBER CURRENT CURRENT CURRENT CURRENT CURRENT CURRENT CURRENT OF OF PEE FEE FEE FEE FEE PRE FEB EMPLOYEES BUSINESSES REVENUE PLUS 310 PLUS$20 PLUS $30 PLUS $40 PLUS $50 0-5 156 $ 55 $ 81580 $10,140 511,700 $13,260 $14,820 316,380 6-10 51 75 3,825 4,335 4,845 5,355 5,865 6,375 11.15 25 95 2,375 2,625 2,875 3,125 3,375 3,625 16-20 IS HS 1,725 1,875 2,025 2,175 2,325 2,475 21.25 11 ISO 1,650 1,760 1,870 1,980 2,090 2,200 26.30 7 170 1,190 1,260 1,330 1,400 5,470 1,540 31.35 3 190 570 600 630 660 690 720 36.40 2 210 420 440 460 480 500 520 40-PLUS 12 220 2,640 2,760 2,800 3,000 3,120 3,240 Total 282 $22,975 $25,795 $28,615 $31,435 $34,255 $37,075 92-93 BUDGET CALCULATIONS: PROJECTED 92-93 CURRENT REVENUES $ 98,962.00 LESS - PROPOSED EXPENDITURES (136,970.00) TOTAL EXCESS OVER REVENUES--------------------$ (38*006.00) INCREASE EXISTING FEES BY $50.00 $ 37,075.00 REINSPECTION REVENUES GENERATED 30500.00 ADDITIONAL REVENUE GENERATED BY INCREASE $ 40f575.00 TOTAL REVENUE8 LESS EXPENDITURES--------- 8 20567.00 NOTE: 1. Each additional $10.00 fee increment will generate an additional $2,820 in revenue. 2. Reinspection revenues generated are not based on incremental percentage increases due to expected compliance by food establishment owners. 91n r: Z SS 1 HANDOUT TO COUNCIL 7-7-92 16 MINUTES OF THE 1992 CITY COUNCIL PLANNING SESSION HELD AT THE GARRETT CREEK RANCH EXECUTIVE CONFERENCE CENTER FRTAAY~ UNE 5. 1992 The meeting was called to order at I0:00 a.m. City Manager Lloyd Harrell welcomed the City Council to the planning session and introduced the staff and topics of the day. At 10:15 a.m,, City staff began its presentations to the City Council. Presentations were made in the following order: Capital Improvements Program - John McGrane, Executive Director of Finance Short & Long Term Finances and Budget - John McGrane Park Development Update - Betty McKean, Executive Director of Municipal services and Janet Simpson, Parks Planner. South Park Land Alternatives Municipal Swimming Pool Betty McKean & Janet Simpson. In regards to the financing of south park land alternatives and the repair work to swimming pool, staff requested direction from the City Council. The council discsission involved methods of financing the purchase of the south pa,k land and the renovation of the municipal swimming Pool. Interest funds from the 1985 Bond Issue were proposed for use in conjunction with either of these projects. However, the Council decided to dedicate the funds to street improvements. Councilmember Mark Chew moved that funds from the 1985 Bond Programbe,0used n to rf ndinstreet $3 improvements. Councilmember Jane Hopkins seconded the motion. Council voted 7-0 in favor of the motion. In regards'' to the acquisition of the south park property, CouncilmeaWr Hopkins moved to use $500,000 of the 1986 Bond funds Councilme ember Ch w~ south C uncil r voted land. 7-0 in avor motion of the seconded motion. by Finally, the council directed staff to develop a Request for Proposals for architectural design work for Phase IA and IB of the Municipal Pool renovation project. Council also directed that Phase IA, totaling $300,000 be funded from earned interest funds from the 1986 Bond Program, but wait until the budget process to decide how to fund Phase IB. Councilmember Euline Brock moved to have staff develop the RFP, fund Phase IA of the renovation from City council minutes 2992 Planning Session June 5-6, 1992 Page 2. bond interest funds and discuses the funding of Phase TB as part of the 1992-93 budget process. Councilmember Jack Miller seconded the motion. Council voted 5-2 in favor of the motion. Councilmembers Chew and Perry voted in apposition to the motion. After the motions and Council votes, staff presentations continuedi Space Master Plan - Betty McKean At approximately 2:15 p.m., the City council broke for lunch. The planning session resumed at 2:00 p.m. with staff presentations: Library Update - Joella Orr, Library Director r Employee Compensation & Benefits - Tom Klinck, Personnel Director Police Update - Mike Jez, Police Chief Fire Update - John cook, Fire Chief Comprehensive Strategic Planning - Frank Robbins, Executive Director of Planning and Community Development Engineering Update - Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering Utilities - Bob Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities, Lee Allison, Director of Water and Wastewater Services, Howard Martin, Director of Environmental Services, Jim Harder, Director of Electrical Services and Bill Angelo, Director of Community Services SATOMY. JIM-E-6, 1992 The City Council resumed its planning session at 8:30 a.m. The day was dedicated to reviewing prior year accomplishments and setting goals and oi0jeotives for the new year. Bob Saunders facilitated the discusiionj The results from the session are attached. Bob Castleberry, Mayor Jesus Nava, Jr. Assistant to the City Manager AAAOOA61 HANDOUT TO COUNCIL 7.7.92 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ACCEPT114G A GRANT OFFER FROM THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $810,000 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AT THE DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT; AND PRO- VIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. wHFREAS, the City of Denton has submitted to thu Federal Aviation Administration an application for federal assistance for a grant of federal funds for a project for development of the Denton Municipal Airport= and WHEREAS, the Federal ,v:ation Administration has approved a project for development of the Airport consisting of the construc- tion of overlay and taxiway improvements] and WHEREAS, the Federal Aviation Administration has submitted to the City of Denton a Grant Offer in the amount of Eight Hundred Ten Thousand ($810,000) Dollars for the construction of such improve- ments, together with a Grant Agreement] and WHEREAS, the City Manager, in accordance with Sea. 8.07 of the Charter of the City of Denton, has requested that the City council transfer $90,000 from the unappropriated balance of the General Fund to Accounting Code Airport Department Budget Account code 100- 022-0019-8907; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: SECTION I. That the City of Denton hereby accepts the Grant Offer and agrees to comply with all of the assurances and condi- tions contained in the Grant Agreement, and the City Manager of the City of Denton or his designee is hereby, authorized to execute such Agreement. SECTION XI, That in accordance with Section 8.07 of the City Charter, the Council hereby approves transfer of $90,000 from the unappropriated balance of the General Fund to Accounting Code Number 100-022-0019-8907 and the expenditures of funds to fulfill the terms of the Grant Agreement. SECTIQ,N III, That this resolution shall become effective im- mediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR S jl ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY3 - Lt- / i Page 2 lj Si i F HANDOUT TO COUNCIL 7.7-92 CITY of DENTON Community Development Office 110 West Oak, Suite B Denton, Texas 76201 (8'17) 383.7726 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 7, 1992 T0: Barbara Ross, Community Development Administrator FROM: Kathy DuBose, Controller, Finance Department SUBJECT: Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) In response to Councilman Mark Chew's request for additional information on CASA, I have attached a copy of the HSC questionnaire from CASA. Ms. Marjorie MacAdsms, Executive Diroctor of the Denton chapter of CASA, submitted this information for review by the Human Services Committee. Please call me at ext. 7236 if you have any questions concerning the human services agency requests. Barbara Ross BR:nb Attachment i t f CASA of Denton County 612 North Bell Denton, Texas 76201 February 26, 1992 City of Denton Human Services Committee 110 West Oak, Suite a Denton, TX 76201 Gentlemen, Enclosed you will find a completed Questionnaire for Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) of Denton County. We respectfully request a grant to CASA of Denton of $10,000 County in the amount , Your consides'ation of this request will be grontly appreciated. if you need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (214) 823-9824 or 526-7945, or you may contact Linda Nomeyer at (817) 565-0289, Sincerely, Marjorie MaCAdams Executive Director MM/sh Enclosure QUESTIONNAIRE FOR A HUMAN SERVICES ORGANIZATION, This questionnaire represents the city of Denton Human Services committee's efforts to compile sufficient information on a particular Human Services Organization no that an adequate assessment and evaluation of the organization, its programs, and its needs can be determined before taking any action or making recommendations to the City Council. The word ORGANIZATION will be used where possible and will also 'mean Agency, Order, Corporation, Association, city Department or Division and Individual. Please answer all questions that are applicable and to the best of your knowledge. If your organization in not yet established, plesae attempt to provide reasonable estimates. NOTE! If you need further assistance, contact Barbara Ross, 383-7726, Section I. General -Information A. Dater 2431 -2P~ A. official Name of organizations Couz-t A7?nointed Special Advocates C. Addresac 612 TI. Dell ° 1 .I on o n 7b2GT D. Telephone Numbers - ($17)565-02$9 E. Name of Person Making Presentations )'lur orie hiacuhdams (Please attach a resume) SEE ATTACIM;N'1' "A" P. Give a brief statement of the purpose and goals of your organizations NASA is a non-nrofl,t orp-nnization in Denton Count that 1"'i11 pro- vide trained court appointed vOJ.untoern r!lo tir 11 nvest e, mon- ed children secure permanent bla oomen-b in P. oafe nurturing holno~t- Section II. Nature of Organization's Request A. Request is from a(an)t Existing organization New organization City department/division B. What are your reasons for appearing before the Human services committees To ensure that V-, SP, beeonien a viable ad,junot to the enltrts of Denton County and an integral part of. Denton County services to abused and or neglected children i Section III. iteguest for Pundirie A. Is this your initial request to this Committee for funds? Yee XX No B. if no, how many other requests have been made in the last three years?- ' HSC Questionnaire Page 2 C. W hat was the nature of these requests and what action did the committee take? needed. Please state briefly use back of page if additional space is D. What is your request to the City Council for funds in dollars? •`0.01000.00 1. If this is your first request for funding, please explain in detail what the above amount will be used fur. Office support (printing, tolenhone brochures vo].un- teer training (training manuals), Salary (ncirt time dir. eotor _ trainingz ~n~i n~ rt i ni nn fi a r3 tats and j1a i nna+ + 2. If your request is an increase over last year's request, please explain in detail why the increase is heeded and what these funds would be used for. N/A E. If this is a now Proor@_M or service please discuss the mood for the program and how that need' will be addressed. Also include monitoring and evaluation efforts. Judges often have ton few faotS regarding a child for whom a Tifo changing; deoioion must be made, The voluntner Advocn.te offers an objoctive citi ,en or9,cnteci viownoint and infor~iat on -etch en-+.hles the Court to make a more i.nfor,..nd ,juclge.mnnt, The Execubive Director 9.0111 be responsible for oomnlinnoe with Rat- iona.l. and state CAJA Standards. F. State whether the program is temporary or permanent, If the program is permanent and you will be expanding the service, state what your expectations are regarding future funding sources. Permanent. Future fundinr; from an annual fundraiser! county- -ble, hunport from businesn and oornorn.tion~,'t looel, hate and federal n+ into i and a nd,.., :al donatlon,a „ HSC Queatlonnalre Page 3 0. If these funds are to be used as a local match for Federal, State or local assistance, please specify= the funding being applied for ,:tats the name, address, and phone number of the funding organization ToxnH CAS 507-A 4est Lynn Austin, TX 78703 (512) 1473-2627 the total amount being requested from the funding organization $_.i,on o 00 the total amount being committed by your organization $ 000.00, and whether your commitment will be cash, in-kind, or both BOTH how long is the funding available for the program fjj0_YJ ljJnjMuM_ H. From what other sources (if any) has your organizationnrsquea ad funds forn(;er~ this program, what was their response, what was the amount and what is the status of the request? Source Amount Status National CASA :010,000,00 Pending, - section IV. Orcanizatlonal and General characteristics of he oroanl:ation A. Name of Executive Director or Person in charger P.iarJoria r1aoAdamq 8. Date organization wan establishedt -,,,2/1!,/92 0. Now waR your organization established? By& 1, Law 2. Articles of Incorporation XX 3. Voluntary Assoc. _-(Since suer 1991) D. Doss the organization have a State approved charter? Yes No 9. Doss,hha organization have written and adopted by-laws? Yen No F. to the organization established for profit , limited profit , or non-profit YY , _ +~+ywwwNe► ~(}.,,,,c~, ~Yhat•y HSC •Questionnalre u[,V Page 5 Section V. Policy Making Body A. The organization is governed by as 1. Board of Directors 2. Executive Committee 3, others so The Polley Making Members are appointed or selected bys Appointed, C. How many serve on this PoiLcy Board? J D. What is the length of their term? nr y ,,11, E, How often do they meet? - ,.W Hood Oct F. If there is no Board or Committee, who is responsible for determining policy? N/A Section VI, Organization's Financial Report A. Revenues by Sources current Budget Pro osed Budget Dec. 31 MonthF'eb. 1992 to Month W. 19%2 Month.Jan, 19,'? to MonthL 192, 1. Federal 2. State 30 City of Denton X610,000.00 (Request sUbotted) exew h_ 44 city of Lewisville 54000,00 (Reque t t bo Ssib- m tte~) 5, The Colony 6. Denton County 7. United Way/Denton e, United Way/Lewlsville 9. Contracts f 17'~A N.~A 10. Donations 4250.00 250,00 ! 11. other* 50000.00 01equost Pending) 0th^ er§10,000,00 (Request Pending) TOTALS Waiting to fulfill requirements so Texas CASA will give us 45,000 as start up grant, ""We are applying to National CASA for a $10,000 start up grant, *04Applying to VOCA for 015#000 grant-Requested Application Forms & Guidelines ~i i t~ 113C questionnaire Page 4 o. To the organization tax exempt at the state level , Federal level , or both With exception of State automobile and gasoline taxes. H. What geographical area does your organization serve? (Please 1Lut specific city neighborhoods, cities or counties. A map delineating your program area may be attached.) DEN ON com my 1. What is the total population of the area served? (Can use 1980 census Data,) 273,525 (1990 Census J. Under what auspices does the organization operates 11 Governmental 2. State 3. Local 4. Voluntary 5, Religious _ 64 Fraternal Order 7. L:jor organization 8, Civic Organizat.ton _ 9. other non- ro IL K. Is your organization classified as institutional semi- institutional (nursery school, day camp, eta,), or non-inutltutIona l j L. Is your organization licensed or supervised by any governmental organization? yes No XX If yen, give name of the organization M. Is your organization a member or branch of any of the followings 1. Community Council 2. United Way 3. Other coordinating or planning body 4. standard setting body or accrediting organization Nations). 0A5A M. What in the total number of professional staff members In the organization?~ What are the main olassifications of professional workers (counselors, planners* coordinators, sto.)7M0i1Livc iayiye~e~ _ o, Now many service volunteers are active during the year? (Do not Include adsnintstrative volunteers, members o► boards or coinnittses,) .10-40 x992..1993 a HSC Qusstionnalre Page 6 B. 1Expenditureei Current Budget Pro osad Budget Dec. 31 Month 19_ to Nonth_ _39_ Month Jan 9-2-2 to Month/ 1992 Personnel Director 410x'/50 Others Salary Increases Non-Personnel Rent 6,000 Telephone 1J400 Utilities _ 1000 Office supplies 12000 Insurance n/a maintenance 400 Conferences# seminars, etc. 850 Mileage -0- Food _0_ Audit Fees 500 Consulting Fees _ n/a FICA 985 Non & ggub oriptions 11 Ot..her* Pos age 1 OBpp O 0ffAce ]emu p; &-7?urn. -1,0000 Contf.ncQllav Fund 1,715 ~r nt~ng As Photocopying 1,200 q un eeret Tra nine Goi / gyel 1,300 _ 900 *If other is more than 1 percent of the total budget, please itemize. Section VI. 0 "nization's inanalal~ ge o t (continued) C. What is the total approved budget for this current fleca.l year? 29~F ,000 What is the total proposed budget for the next fiscal year? *33o000 D. What is your organization's cost per unit of service? (Examples cost per trip, cost per meal, coot per volunteer hour). More than one may be neaded. Estimated X66. /4oont por volunteer hour NOTAs Please attach a copy of your Annual Roport or Audit and current approved budyst. SEE ATTACIIhtEINT "B" HSC Questionnaire Page 7 5~ation VII, Gerylces Provided by Oraanizatior.~ A. Explain in what specific functlon(e)/field(s) your organization is now oAt peraa~~~ting (in Information and Referral, Child welfare, etc.) the time thi`c than?' ),a ao.rsrr1Ara►. (,1A!t4 njanr +n l.n.,o ..n1iI.q-tC,er 7..3vocates !vor'tin ; t,ith abused and ne,^^ ectecl children f !:}tnm tho courts have J11ried.iction. 8. Are there any specific client participation qualificattonu (income limits, minority groups, geographical area, etc.) Court appointed child cases ( usu7,lly Child nroteetive eery .o oases ) , - C. Please estimate the total number of persons/families to be served that are low and vary low income. See Attachment A for income levels, Very Low Income Low Income D. How is the need for your organization's services documented? CA5A has arnv,n frnm nnn r?rnran i a„,j~attj_a lrl_ in 1007 +n z7o CASA ngonotes in 4? St:~tesj (29 of which are in Te ,)q t u H~ ~ Ins Uri f f rYs P e a E. Are the earns •or similar services' now beL~~ ~rovlded y e.nother organization in Denton County? Yes No if so, planes give name of organization, type of service, difference in their and your services. F. Service Statistics for last fiscal year. 1, Total number of persona contacting organization N/A 2. Total number of persons contacted by organization _ 3. Total number of clients served A, Total number of clients referred to another organization 6. Total number of clients being turned down a. Ara local citizens provided with the opportunity to participate In the development of the organization's programs (does not include volunteers. Yes_ How do they participate Arved on origiona]. steering comm. No Please explain why Currently on Board of. Dir., and Vol. °i HSC Questionnaire Page 8 H. Direct benefits are those where funds are provided to assist a specific household or group. Indirect benefits are those where households or neighborhoods benefit are a result of a project even though funds were not provided directly to them. Please indicate the approximate number and type(s) of benefits your project/program will provide. Explain the benefits that will result. 14 Indirect households benefiting Explanation _ 3. Direct households benefiting Explanation.])nnandon-t on_numher of oases ass ad her nnnrt, There are currontly many children under tho court'.,i iuris- I. Are local citizens provided with the opportunity to participate in the policy making decisions of the organization? yes ox How Through Board of :Arootor_:~_ No Please explain why r it Now often are the organization's proyrame monitored and evaluated and who does the monitoring? Volunteorr are monitored on a ocntinual basis by the Executive c r , Dir. monthly t,,3.th an annual evaluation. Texas has periodio o~, a Section VIII, Pleesa Identify any unmo agda you sea in your organization lr~r~o ~ and/or the community. U Looking in the futttro CASA continues to nlan for expanding nin- ority involvement both at Board end volunteer level. Administratively, a nart 'time georetnry will be added. w asc Questionnaire Page 9 Section I%. other commants which might be useful to the Committee Denton Co+.irity is the fastest growing, county in the Ste.to, and the second fastest r.,r.,orr.ing in the Country. This moans a great- er stress on the existintr social service aroneieg attomntint, to handle the growing numbers of abusol and neglected children, The reaeon those of, us in Denton_ County who aro involved vai th CASA are so excited, 19 due to the outstanding reputation for helping abused and negIncted children en;joyod by the CASA pro- grain natj.mvide. In 1986, President ReaCn e recognized CASA aii cline of the seventeen outstanding volunteer programs in the coun- try . AAA002FO Revisedi 01/15/92 s ATTACIDIENT "A° Marjorie L. MacAdams Resume 4318 Briar Creek Lane (214) 823-9824 Dallas, TX 75214 EXPERIENCE: 1976 to January 1980---FAMILY OUTREACH NORTHWEST Helped to create and run Family Outreach Northwest, under the auspices of the National Council of Jewish Women, Family outreach Northwest is toCay an ongoing viable non--profit organization. January 1980 to July 1990---FOSTER CHILD ADVOCATE SERVICE Director of FOCAS, The National Council of Jewish Women and the Dallas Mental Health Assn. appointed Marjorie MacAdams as Director of the new non-profit organization, FOCAS. During her tenure as Director and Executive Director of Focas, MacAdams, along with George Golman, initiated the now well. established and very successful "April in Paris" annual charity ball, In may of 1990, Marjorie received the Director of the Year Award from the National CASA Assn, This award was established for CASA by the National Kappa Alpha Theta Sorority, In May 1990, The Dallas Volunteer Center presented MacAdmams, on behalf of FOCAS, the County Outstanding Volunteer organization of the Year Award. September 1990 to July 1991---PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR of TEXAS CASA During the ten months that Marjorie MacAdams served In this position, she started 14 additional Texas CASA Programs, with 8 or 10 in the offing. She helped initiate nearly all of the 13 programs already in existence in September of 1990, During her years with FOCAS, she and then Judge Craig Penfold, had started programs throughout the state. Today there are 27 or 28 programs in Texas, Due to funding cuts, MacAdam's job became non-existent, EDUCATION: Woodrow Wilson High School Dallas, TX Northwestern University Evanston, IL University of Texas Austin, TX a ^E PAGE 2 Marjorie L. MacAdams PROFESSIONAL SKILLS' Excellent management skills. Fine ability to work with people- I.E. volunteers and professional ...Knowledgeable and proficient in getting new programs off the ground... Fund raising ability--bath creative and traditional... Skilled in 111terviewing techniques and in interpersonal relationships ...Excellent understanding of; and ability in, public relations... Experienced public speaker and writer. ITION AND Texas CASA HONORS 1991 member of Texas ssn, for Infant Mental Health 1999--Testimonial Dinner planned by FOCAS Board 1990--Received Director of the year award for National CASA f Avian, 1990-As Executive Director of FOCAS, accepted the Volunteer of the Year Award for most outstanding Volunteer of the Year organization in Dallas County. i 198901990--Vice President of Texas CASA Network Board 1989-1990--Served on State Task Force Board on Permanency 1988-1990--Member of child Abuse Coalition Board 1987-1989--Board Member of National Center for Juvenile Justice out of Pittsburg,Pa, 1987-1988--Board Member of National Center for Juvenile and FAmily Court Judges based in Reno,Nv. 1985-1987--president National CASA Assn.( Received the Presidential Award from President Reagan as one of the 17 outstanding volunteer organizations in the U.S.) Marjorie Mac Adams has also served on numerous local boards, including the Mayor's Task Force on Adolescence. (P( C Ir ;j t M ATTAC[04EuT ',B° C1lSft Ur DF,MTON COUNTY PROPOsi'D BUDe3E'r JONUMY t, 1992 TI IRU OECEMDfR 31, 1992 1 NCOMt: r Orantu Contributions/Oonat:,l0lie gi5,00q In Kind Contributionm 5,000 '1'0'1'/1L. PRO,IGCTED .INCOME -9-~QL110 $29,000 rXi"1 NS ES i n, AdminIetratIvot anlnrv (Feb' 1-I•Irsv 3.t, 1 dnv a week. r; incLcrdeA 6ravoI ) Salnrv (Juan t--OOa.31) Part-tlmo $ 21050 81750 TnxAa and rrl ige benet'lts for OO rlOCOuntinp Serviccia Part-time S985 Dunes/5ubsorlpfiOlin 6(10 Trashing R rd. (conrer•nnco/']'ravel) lUU Orrion I,anninp b5U MI.( Iti(i s 6,000 To Icrrhonn 11000 Fur nlburo !i r)r(ire Epuinmr, 11000 Equipmcir,t 11n.trst(Ina nco/ por'l ro 11000 Orr lrn 5urp1 as 400 PrI ntinp/i'Itobororvlnp 1,200 Poetapn 11200 1_000 't'otal 525, 9B5 F}, VutuntPbrer 'Crai nirig E,Onrerencl~i'Cr+.rvr~l 5 500 09 Tubed 5 1300 C, ContInpenoIec; Tof>al ffi 1715 r TOTAL rROJECTED EXPENSt3S $211000 i CITY ofDENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E, MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 HEMORAMUX DATE: July 6, 1992 TO: The Mayor and Members of the city council FROM: Harlan L. Jefferson, Director of Treasury Operations SUBJECTt TAX EXEMPTIONS ~~N During the review of the Major Budget Issues Report, a member of the city council inquired about tax exemptions offered by area taxing jurisdictions. The jurisdictions include Denton County, Denton Independent School District (DISD), and the County Education District (CED). We have compared the level of their 1991-92 "over 6511 and homestead exemptions to the City of Denton0s exemptions, and the information is as followet OVER 65 HONBS"rBAD JUI?ISDICTIOAI BXBNPrION LEVEL BXBlIR= Denton Independent School District $ 10,000 $5,000 County Education District 20,000 $51000 20% of Value) City of Denton 20,000 $5,000 Denton county 500000 $ 0 If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. I AFF002F9 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 t: i s 3a tj wry OI osmr m, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Corria Gil, Budget Analyst, Finance FROM: Robert K. Tickner, Superintendent of Parks DATES July 7, 1992 SUBJECT: Mowing Cost for 30 Acres at North Lakes Park This is in reference to Councilman Harold Perry's question on the cost for mowing the 30 acres of park land on the south side of North Lakes Park. This land is proposed to be reassigned to Class D maintenance level, no mowing. The cost is estimated to be $2,160 for mowing this area six times between May and October. Please advise if additic al information is requested. /Robert K. Tick ar AJJ00445 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 ~i F) ,i r r - REQUEST TO ADDRESS AN AGENDA ITEM WELCOME to the Denton City Council meeting! The City Council is pleased to have you at this meeting. If you wish to address the City Council on an agenda item, please follow the format outlined below. This will assist the Mayor in calling upon you in an orderly fashion so that everyone who wishes to speak has the opportunity. 1. Any person wishing to address the City Council on an agenda item or a public hearing item is requested to complete the form on the opposite side of this card. 2. The Mayor will call your name to speak at the appropriate time on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each on regular agenda items and five minutes each on public hearing items. 3. When addressing the Council, please step forward to the speaker's podium, state your name and address, and direct your comments to the Mayor and City Council. PLEASE RETURN THIS CARD TO THE CITY SECRETARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS AN AGENDA ITEM PLEASE PRINT NAME DATE ADDRESS PHONE CITY ZIP CODE AGENDA ITEM - A. I wish to speak on this item. I will speak ins _ Support Opposition H. I do not wish to speak on this item, but would like the following comments circulated to the City Councils Support Opposition Time limit for regular agenda items is three minutes and five minutes for public hearings.