The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06-23-1992 At p), nda 11ni17,_ AGENDA QG ~D CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL U June 23, 1992 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, June 23, 1992 at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: NOTE: Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may also be considered as part of the Agenda for the Regular Session. 5:15 p.m. 1. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V..1.T.S. 1. Consider settlement offer in R. C. Small & Assoclates, Inc. v. City of Denton, Texas. 2. Consider settlement offer in Winterrowd vs. Casteel, et al. 3. Consider authorization for settlement of David Amberson and Linda Amberson v. Todd Kidwell and City of Denton, Texas. 1 V. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Consider appointments to all City of Denton Boards and commissions. 2. Discuss personnel matters and duties of the City Manager, %ne City Attorney, and the Municipal judge as related to the operation of Municipal Court. 2. Receive a report and hold a discussion on the Master Plan for the 200 acre South Park Including the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board's recommendation for initial development. 3. Presentation and discussion of the Capital Improvement Program. (Recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Public Utilities Board.) City of Denton City Council Agenda 7 June 23, 1992 Page 2 4. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the city's new automated attendant phone service. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, June 23, 1992 at 7100 p.m. in the Council. Chambers of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: 7:00 p.m. 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Resolutions of Appreciation A. Consic:er approval of a resolution of appreciation for Tillman Uland. 3. Citizen Reports A. keceive a citizen report from Mike Reynolds, Grubbs and Ellis, regarding the City's cooperation in development projects. B. Receive a citizen report from Joe Dodd regarding proposed amendments to the sexually oriented busineso ordinance. C. Receive a citizen report from Fred Connell regarding addition of a proposed drainage project to the capital improvement program. 4. Public Hearings A. Hold a public hearing on and consider approval of the preliminary and final replats of portions of Lots 7 and 8; into Lot 11, Block 71 of the Alex Robertson Addition. The 51040 sq. ft. lot is located on the north side of Mill Street between Cook and Allen Streets. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-0 at its June 10 meeting.) 1 City of Denton City Council Agenda ~3 7 June 23, 1992 Page 3 B. Hold a public hearing on and consider approval of the preliminary and final replat of Lots 11 2 and 3, block It Janke Addition, Lots 1-71 Block It eon property h located onrthe east side of Bonnie Bran, approximately 800 feet south of University Drive. (The Planning theirn meetingg of o Mays29n recommended approval 1992.) C. Hold a public hearing on and consider adoption of an ordinance approving an amendment to SpecifiUs Permit No. 200 (Kern Personal Care Center), enlarging the area from 4.82 acres to 4.857 acres. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-0 at their meeting of May 13, 1992.) 5, Consent Agenda Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Aproval of designee totimplementt each Item In accordi the Staff recommendations. Listed below are bids and purchases orders to be approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda, Detailed back- up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 6.A, 6.B, 6.C). This listing is provided on the Consent Ageenapproval da t a lof Council Members to discuss or withdraw an item prior the Consent Agenda. A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid #1365 - 300 KVA Padmounted Transformers 2, Bid #1370 - Lease of Scraper 3, Bid #1366 - Wilson Street Sidewalk Improvements 4, Bid #1374 - Demolition and Clearing #19 5, Bid #1388 - Cooke County College Construction 6, P.O. #25029 - IBM 7, P.O. #25030 - IBM Agoncla Nu.._-~a Anonda I~lo G ~3~: ~ 7 City of Denton City Council Agenda June 23, 1992 page 4 B. Plats and Replats replat of Lot 1, Consider approving a preliminary Block 1, plus approximately .588 acres of unplatted land into Lots 1R and 2R, Block It of the Alvin Addition. (The Planning and Charlotte Whaley royal 5-0 at their a commended app Zoning Commission re 1992.) meeting of June 10, 6. ordinances A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting a competitive sealed proposal and awarding a contract fo)' purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. (5.A.1. Bid #1365, 5.A.2. - Bid #1370) B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive 5 Award Bid contraLO-V 4publid aids and providinq for the works or improvements. Bid #1388) #1374, 5.A.5. for the C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing expenditure of funds for purchases of materials or exempting accordance with the eprovisions eoff state n law source a such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. (5.A.6. - P,o, #25059, 5.A.7. - p.o. #25030) D. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with Corga Associates Architects for professional consultingJr. services in Recreation connection with the Martin Luther King, Center and anticipated future litigation. E. Consider adoption of an ordinance with authoriziTengxathse State City sportation for Manager. to execute an nand prdinanc ublic Tranthe 181 at Depa y rtment o of Highways installation of traffir, signal controllers Dak2Meadow its intersection with interstate Highway and authorizing Drive, and Londonderry Lane in the expenditure of funds therefore. City of Denton June 23, 1992 City Council Agenda !3rio c Page g F. Consider adoption of traffic from south ton ordinance providin intersection with north on Malone Stre t or one-way feet Scripture Street to a from its Stree(200') north of said intersection°with wo hundred and providing for a penalty in the Scripture of $200.00 for violations thereof, maximum amount • G. Consider adoption of 150 providin an ordinance revising Ordinance 9,1- Denton g• rules of procedure for the City Council of time limits of business me ing presentations for City Council ngsnF and He Consider meetings, adoption of an ordinance authorizing Manager to execute a contract >Jetween the Cit end C.H. Guernsel• she city X9°2 electric utllie lating consultin Y of Denton Y rate study, g services for the 7. Resolutions A. Consider a Manager to proval of a resolution authorizin t he statement submit an amendment to the 1990 riv City Projected Use ofCommunity Develupment ObjecLivesnd H°UBin Funds s(,bmitted to the and g and Urban Develorment, Department of Be Consider approval of Mans er to a resolution authorizing g execute all necessary documents to the city that $25,000 in 1990 Community Development Block rovide fund6 be designated to be sed in conjunction with Section 202 E1derl Grant sing that the National Deve ypmnt C ncil am Grant a a la ment pplication by C. Consider approval order for information b resolution complying with Environmental Protection A g 6 of the United the NO- VI-91-2641. g Y~ as contained in States Docket D. Consider approual. of officials ng resolution for designating certain behalf as bein of the City of Denton indealinting far, and on Parks & Wildlife Department, for g with the the Texas park land located certain grant programs for 200 acres ac rpose of pertlRecreationcipatinat Teasley and Hobson, res of Advisory Board recommends (The Parks and 8- Miscellaneous approval.) matters from the city Manager, City of Denton City Council Agenda Q~ June 23, 1992 Page 5 F. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for one-way traffic from south to north on Malone Street from its intersection with Scripture Street to a point two hundred feet (200') north of said intersection with Scripture street; and providing for a penalty in the maximum amount of $200.00 for violations thereof. G. Consider adoption of an ordinance revising ordinance 90- 150 providing rules of procedure for the City Council of Denton, Texas; amending presentations by citizens and time limits of business for City Council. meetings. H. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract between the City of Denton and C.H. Guernsey relating consulting services for the 1992 electric utility rate study. 7. Resolutions A. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to submit an amendment to the '.990 Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds submitted to the Dep..-_tment of Housing and Urban Development. B. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute all necessary documents to provide that $25,000 in 1990 Community Development Block Grant funds be designated to be used in conjunction with a Section 202 Elderly Housing Program Grant application by the National Development Council. C. Consider approval of a resolution complying with the order for information by Region 6 of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, as contained in Docket No. VI-91-2641. D. Consider approval of a resolution designating certain officials as being responsible for, acting for, and on behalf of the City of Denton in dealing with the Texas Parks & Wildlife Department, for the purpose of participating in certain grant programs for 200 acres of park land located at Teasley and Hobson. (The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommends approval.) 8. Miscellaneous matters from the city Manager. - z City of Denton City Council Agenda , June 23, 1992 Page 6 9. Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 10. New Business This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 11. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art, 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. NOTE: THE CITY EXECUTIVE SESSION ATCANYCTIME EREGARDI G{ ANYIITEM TFOR WH CH ITNIS LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE. C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denotoclock Texas, } the _day of 1992 at r _ CITY SECRETARY ACC00096 -1 fir, fi;fn - J CitY of Denton Cit June 23~ 1992 Y Council Agenda Page 7 Q NOTE; THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IS ACCESSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS HEARING IMPAIRED FOR THE IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 566-8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX SO A SIGN LANGUAGE THETCITY SECR TARP SIOFFICEITER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH A.. 4iro c CITY UNCILi oooo~odo~anana11oa~ooo~ till o d OO~~d ! a N t oOV~, CCGGGLIO~~ vqpp~ F +444 'CITY COUNCIL' -OOOQVa~9QQQ O~oo' F < O lioco~caa'~°°° _ l T - Tjtrr ~:t -4 f..:t 1" tl L:. June 11, 1992 Mr. John Cooper Denton Beautification Commission 215 East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 r Dear John; I regret that my personal obligations require me to resign my Board Member position on the Denton Beautification Commission. I spoke with Cecille Carson who suggested that I remain involved in an advisory capacity. Although that is appealing I feel until I complete my job search for employment, it will be necessary to devote full time to this endeavor. I fully support the program and its great benefit to Denton, and will hope to be involved again in the 'uture if an opportunity is availa?le. Best re 97-- ' W. idd Jone , June 15, 1992 Edward J. Coomes, Jr.. 809 Denton Denton, Texas 16201 Dr. Jean B. Schaake Chairperson, City of Denton Library In Care of College of Arts and Sciences University of North Texas Denton, Texas 76203 Dear Dr. Schaake: as a member Friday, June 12, 1992, I was informed indirectly that I on ard. The information came, have a conflict of interest in the matter of arrell. I remember of the City of Denton Library Bo Mr, Lloyd indirectly, from the city manager, not I might have such a some time ago asking whether or conflict thee is and was told no, but I do not remember whom I board any event, I do need to resign frand~h of lccurse, I do not wish to now, apparently, a conflict, ard does. The ground of the work which the bofor the library- SO compromise any wife, suzanne, conflict is that resignation. please accept my ht me a I shall miss all of you on the board; you all have tang colleagues. Mrs. Orr very great deal and have been delightful taas and well I as have to Mrs. se convey my thanks and Mrs. Poole also have taught me excellen e ou l enjoyed being with all of you. Will y p to all of you in and best wishes to all members of the boar , Orr and Mrs. Poole? Thank you, and best wishes and for our city. your future deliberations for the library Sincerely yours, .2 r /EGdwaxd J 'Cooms,GJr. , co: City Manager, Mr. Lloyd Harrell / Library Director, Mrs. Joella Orr v Mrs. Eva Poole Councilman, Dr. Harold Perry File -WWI -o vy 01 X)t'l G~ June 9, 1992 r To htayor Castleberry and rCity Council. DJembersI This is to inform you that as of the end of my 2nd term as planning and zoning commissioner I will not consider serving a 3rd term, Thank you for the opportunity to serve my community and fellow man in such a noteworthy position. It has been a great learning experience as well as an enjoyable one. If I can be of futher assistance to the council or city please call men Thank you very much Respectfully yours VCt w rY~.O ry V~ Fran Morgan t1 CITY OF DENTON BOARD APPOINTMENT INFORMATION NAXE Jn; PHONE NO, ~J ADDRz3C~~~ S (~'S I(r~~/I STATE ))~Z~~IP CODE CITY NAME OF EMPLOYER . 3F7 ILL(- PHONE N0, ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER o ( ZIP CODE CITY STATE C 0 ' T~ OCCUPATION C}(ICf^ /~ILG"7l HAVE YOU PRIOR SERVICE ON A CITY BOARD? No IF YES, PLEASE DESCRISE1 NAME OF CITYr - WOULD YOU HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON ANY BOARD? /U IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBii Oft ~I~PaP7 Ap~!)Snk i~b SERL'E7 _ ON WHICH BOARD DO YOU WISH TO ~l STATEMENT OF APPLICANT+ ! i ni .rLiAi F'I !_~C? ?bG1L~~ 1r S/ ~'T 1+( (C'F .s rJ i j77u1S i'cxJ P~NttE Fr fl) AAl GNS~~E-:Tl lu~'T TifcSF nF z(s c.ilc DATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT r2~C / c N T rj(i~t , BOARD MEMBER ATTENDANCE POLICY It is the policy of the City of Denton City Councll that Members of the various of a City Boards and s Commissions ith removed from office MemLefor be removed on the various meeting following basisi 1. Reoullar deBtinga. Board Members may be removed ro loffic for three unexcused absences during the course of one year andlor ack of at SC% of the number of regular meetings in the year. 2 lao attendancee ait 50% of the number of specialecalled Meetl gs~ in one Board or determined sby absence for nthed affe ted notification year. nced An ugiven s nd/orn As Is defined commission. w rr rr n Y u - OFFICE USE ONLYe TERM OF APPOINTMENTr BEGINNING -NDINO ILPPLZCATION MUST BE ANDSNO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN UNTIL THE SECOND MEETING FOLLOWING THEUPRESENTATION. AD rnda t; o. crrr GF DEHTGx BOARD APPOINTMENT INFORMATION tlrlcr,,ia Han___L~S C . NAVE L L. 7- 8' F.- ADDRESS OM R~ - _ J7 APl„,Ov✓ ; PHONE NO. CITY STATE 1 ZIP CODE NAME OF EMPLOYER Rs-- 7-O'K ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER PHONE NO. CITY STATE ZIP CODE OCCUPAT.CON r ' HAVE YOU PRIOR SERVICE ON A CITY BOARD? a IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE, NAME OF CITY, - - - WOULD YOU HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON ANY BOARD? 10 IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE? ON WHICH BOARD DO YOU WISH To SERVE?~ - L~LZ(~~' !S~! s-.~C~,(('.~SA~67 Y S v rao/C~' ,yA~{ , STATEMENT OF APPLICANT? H&S_ a 4 4v _ 8 Y S, .LAS T~_ 5: JIL1' k/Fl n ~ ANY 1 DATE ~ ' Ly, SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT BBOARD_ BERATTENDANCE_ POL_ZC_Y It is the Policy of tthe City of Denton City Council that Members of the various City Beards and Commissions be removed from office for Zack of attendance at the various meetings of the Boards and commission, Members may be removed on the following basiat 1a ular Meatt f1" Board Memberv may be removed from office for three unexcused absences during the course of one year and/or lack of attendance at 50% of the number of regular meetings in the year. 2. S ec a Cal ed Msating Board Mambos may be removed from office for lack Of attendance at 50% of the number of Special Called Meetings in one year. An unexcused absence is defined as an absence for which no advanced not.ificat!on is given and/or as determined by the Chairman of the affected Board or Commission OFFICE USE ONLY---- TERM OF .4PPOSNTMENT7 THIS APPLICAT BEGINNIN(7 ION MUST BE P „ Y ENDING AND NO ACTION WI RESENTED TO ,;fE COUNCIL MEMBERS IN EXECUTIVE SESSION, LL BE TAKEN UNTIL THE SECOND MEETING FOLLOWING THE PRESENTATION. / CITY OF DENTON A~IVO BOARD APPOINTMENT INFORMATION 64- 397- NAME 10 I / ~A ^ O q_~ . PHONE NO ADDRESS 2 ZIP CODE STATE CITY NAME OF EMPLOYER R e PHONE N0. ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER r '`f ZIP CODE STATE CITY e 4 "e _ ✓CC0 -:3--- _ OCCUPATION ? /,l u HAVE YOU PRIOR SERVICE ON A CITY BOARD IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE! NAME OF CITY1 WOULD YOU HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON ANY BOARD? - IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE;,_-._--------- ON WHICH BOARD DO YOU WISH TO SERVE? the ~L{y ~,f qde ti0kk ~ STATEMENT OF APPLICANTr .G T/o'±: A AJI ,t Y ~d AL ATURE OF APPLICANT DATE C- BARD ious ME BER ATTEND C POL CY Council that Members of the var the City of Denton City -9 for the It is the policy ,of removed on the city Boards and oof ofieheons besrandVeomrr+ieston~C Memberscma of attendance at various meetings following basis; s Board Memoera may be removed from office for tree unexcued e year and/or lack of attendance t 3A.-ab es during the course of on un the number of regular meetings in the year at 50% of s maY be removed from Office Board Member, in one 2' lack f-attandance3g of the number of Spacial Celled Meetings year. is defined a an absence for which no advanced notification s determined by the Chairman Of the affected Board or An l;ntven9e8 d/orn as de is 4 Commission. OFFICE USE-ONLY' ENDING `J OF ApPOIHTMENT1 BEGINNING TERM ETHE SECOND MEETING E FOLLOWING THEUPREBENTATT.ON. THIS AppLICATION MUST BE PSENI WILL BE TARE UNTIL AND NO ACTION r CITY OF DENTON Ai~t~Ai BOARD APPOINTMENT INFORMATION rrnME - ADDRESS`~ PHONE NO. CITY STATE ZIP CODE NAME (~OF EMPLOYER S•1 (tie. S 7 1 ~iQss U ttv ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER PHONE NO, 0' o'mf~ CITY STATE ZIP CODE * OCCUPATION Q-Ax om HAVE YOU PRIOR SERVICE ON A CITY BOARD? IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBEr NAME OF CZTY: WOULD YOU HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON ANY BOARD? IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE: ON WHICH BOARD DO YOU WISH TO SERVE? r~U LCxCi&Vk STATEMENT OF APPLICANT: I: "e ~v 4S22L' 1~1~11C. DeN 1 5 'ror- A Le ' 1f'[ Ul.e C G(. r11nre /teeSf tiX6 14iCtG1%1 hod, DATE G "~G l L SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT BOARD MEMBER ATTENDANCE POLICY It is the policy of the City of Denton city council that Members of the various City Boards and Commissions be removed from office for lack of attendance at the various meetings of the Boards and Commission. Members may be removed on the following basis: . Regular Meeting Board Members may be removed from office for three unexcused absences during the course of one year and/or lack of attendance at 50% of the number of regulaa' meetings in the year. 2. Special Called Meetings. Board Members may be removed from office ,+'or lack of attendance at 50% of the number of Special Called Meetings in one year. An unexcused absence is defined as an absence for which no advanced notification is given end/or as determined by the Chairman of the affected Board or Commission. OFFICE USE ONLYI TERM OF APPOINTMENT: BEGINNING ENDING THIS APPLICATION MUST BE PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL MEMBERS IN EXECUTIVE SESSION, AND NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN UNTIL THE SECOND MEETING FOLLOWING THE PRESENTATION. crrY OF OSNTON BOARD APPOZNTXSXT "FORXATION /dlr,;ir'id PJn ih!m ClJS C ADDRESS - U ) PHONE NO. -~J-- CIT~ STATE• - 1--~ _ ZIP CODE 7 oo NAME OF Eh:LOYER ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER PHONE NO. CITY STATE - ZIP CODE OCCUPATrOH HAVE YOU PRIOR SERVICE ON A CITY BOARD? IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE, NAME OF CITY, WOULD YOU HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON ANY BOARD IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE,? OH WHICy BOARD DO ^~r ! YOU WISH TO SERVE? CC - - STATEMENT OF APPLZCANTr.. Wit, DATE ~J u~ra U'Qa_ SIQNATURS 0,7 APPLICANT C tit ~u fb ti}~ It is ehe c~='~`\~ Fo11cy of City the C1 f Denton Cit Boerdr and Commissions be removed Y Council that members of variou attendthe various following of the Boerda and Commission. office for Ime* of 1. g beatst ance members may be removed 'It the on the 8lfCY2lts Kee c^ Board me un0xou, absences durin hers O1dy be removed from office at 50% of the number of g the course of one Year and or lac for three regular meetings in the yaar/. k of attendance ,4~ tctal •>>ed ,w. lack of attendance at 50'. of othe members may be removed from office for year. number of Special Called Meeting a An unexcused one 11 given absence is defined as an and/or as det absence for which no Adv Commission ermined by the chairman of the arced notification affected Board or OFFICE USS ONLY, TERM OF APPOINT MAWrj "_ig~GXWX-NG DING THIS APPLICATION mUgT PR8 N D AND NO ACTION WZLL BS T TO TH6 COUNCIL NSm BRS IN SXECUTIY-~ E 5 L AKEN UNTZL THS SECOND NZETINO FOLLOWImO THS PRSSSN.TATZON, der 7 Aglilda No, ~ C D/ P CITY OF DENTON BOARD APPOINTMENT INFORMATION Agerd+) fh'ill.,.„`~s__- • NAME 12 ADDRESS 7 q C PHONbJ ' N0. -~-L! CITY STATE f - f ,J ZIP CODE NA,11E OF EMPLOYER ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER M 1 s 7' PHONE N0. CITY TA ZIP CODE r Fyu~'~:.r -ter k 1 . OCCUPATION HAVE YOU PRIOR SERVICE ON A CITY BOARD? p IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE: NAME OF CITYi WOULD YOU HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON ANY BOARD? _yo y(' IF YES, PLEASE DES'CRIBEr ON WHICH BOARD DO YOU WISH TO SERVE? _AZQ 02 rs i STATEMENT OF APPLICANT: " - GrG .refer DATE 000 - - 1Z, SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT J 1 - / B_4RD MEMBER ATTENDANCE POLICY It is the policy of thO City of Denton city council that Members of the various City Boards and commissions he removed from office for lack of attendance at the various meetings of the Boards and Commission. Members may be removed on the following basis: Reaular Meese1 unexcused Absenaces during the courseaof obe removed from office for three ne year and/or lack of attendance at 50% of the number of regular meetings in the year, 2. SneCia Called Meetings. Board Members may be removed from office for Lack of attendance at 50% of the number of special called Meetings in one year. An unexcused absence is defined as an absence for which no advanced notification is given and/or as determined by th, chairman of the affected Board or commission. _ OFFICE USE ONLY: TERM OF APPOINTMENTr BEGINNING THIS APPLICATION MUST BE PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL MEMBERS 1'N EXECUTIVE SESSION, AND 80 ACTION WILL BE TAKEN UNTIL THE SECOND MEETING FOLLOWING THE PRESENTATION. BOARD APPOXNTMSNT rxFORMATiOM / J0 WATSON tt'dj NAME 1105 ABBOT'S LANE (817) - 566-0570 Home ADDRESS PHONE NO, ,DENTON TEXAS 76205 CITY STATE ZIP CODE HCA DENTON CWDIUNITY HOSPITAL_ _ SPECIAL CARE COORDINATOR - INTENSIVE CARE AND PROGRESSIVE CARE UNIT NAME OF EMPLOYER 207 N. BONNIE BRAE. _ (8i ! - 898-7001 Work ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER PHONE No. DENTON TEXAS _ 76201 CITY STATE ZIP CODE REGISTERED NURSE - SPECIAL CARE COORDINATOR OCCUPATION HAVE YOU PRIOR SERVICE ON A CITY BOARD? NO R IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE! _ NAME OF CITY: WOULD YOU NAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON ANY BOARD? NO IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIDEt ON WHICH BOARD 00 YOU WISH TO SERVE? Denton Housing Authority Board and/or HHum n Se vie Advi9o u om iC~ee STATEMENT OF APPLICANT) I believe it-3s mporran~ o conyrrt6uR o e community in which you ddlive. I feel}}~~I am well-qualified to contribute to thel.ebov, yesinccereswisi too mh~nEr~bdreou~o C~ieeweitare o dt~ieep~puYyaceao my anc ue _ =MII112TY." DATE 06-10-92 SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT C ~~QX SCS7lJ Be= MEwsER ATTE1?DANCB POLICY It in the policy of, the City of Denton City Counci? that Members of tho various City auar6a and Commissions be removed :rom office for Itck of attendance at the various meetings of the boards and Commission. Member] may be removed on the following baslst An. Board Members may be removed from office for three 1. g~eular xegt " unsroused absences during the course of one year and/or lack of attendance at 501 of the number of regular meetings in the year. 2. Jnecial Ca1,[bd lilt 1, Board Members may be removed from office for lack of attendance at 50% of the number of Special Called Meetings in one year. An unereused absence is defined as an absence for which no advanced notification is given and/or as determined by the Chairman of the affected Board or commission. ,r** I would be pleased~torserve _on any board or committee deemed appropriate. OIFICB UJd OMLYt TEAM OF APPOXH21HAWT: BEaINWIWG ENDING THIS APPLICATION MUST BE PRESFNTED TO THE COUNCIL MEMBEAS IN EXECUTIVE SBSSIOM, AND 90 ACTION WILL BB TAXEN UNTIL THE SECOND MEETING FOLLOWING THE PUSEWTATION. CITY : _ coUNCIL" _ ~ Y oO~Qa opOu nD~~~00 O° + .v r 000- Oti -o° , p vo o ~ d kj_ . ~G40DC~4G4p0 y .t CITY COUNCIL_PORT- REFORMAT / X) TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council e tLQ, FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, Ciry Manager O DATE: June 18, 1992 SUBJECT: Initial Park Development at the south Park RECOMMENDATION: Accept a proposal for initial park development at Pato be submitted rk Fund Grant to Texas Parks and wildlife for a the South Park matching Local ` SUMMARY: This grant proposal to be submitted on July 316 1992 to Texas Parks and Wildlife park facilitieslforvthis are of the cityhl Park will address needed pa In addition, i.t allows the rantity The Pa ks and SRecrOeation 1Advisory funds with a matching g osal be submitted to the state inBoard the has recgrant appommend icat that ion tpackage. The proposal includes a development adjacent to Hobson Lane with abpicnic sand tables, playground, 2 tennis courts, volleyball, lake with fishing pier, open space, soft and hard surface trails, restroom and parking. A neighborhood park type of development near Jason Drive an on onderry would include basic picnic and playground BACK.___ GROUND: Two neighborhood meetings have development receive been held to the input from interested parties regardi an was developed a grant park. After the preliminary master p rant, proposal was formulated which balances the criteria of the g the long range park development needs of the city, associated maintenance costs, and the expressed desires of the adjacent neighborhood. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: The South Denton ark users th' ~ughout the City will directly community as well as park facilities. benefit from these expanded pa this sitetenance costs will be FISCAL IMPACT: Additional development operation associated with any RESPECIF,,FULLY SUBMITTED: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Ile, city council Report Format O Page - 2 prepared Name: Janet Simpson ordinator Title: Park Planning Approved: Name: t McKe Title; Executive rector for Municipal Services/Economic Development AJJ003FF CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 115 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 M E M O R A N D U M To: Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Betty McKean, Executive Director for Municipal. Ser•df:es and Economic Development DATE: June 18, 1992 SUBJECT: Proposal for Initial Development of South Park with the imminent purchase of the South Park, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has recommended that staff proceed with a matching gr<.-.nt application to Texas Parks and Wildlife for initial development of basic park facilities. This initiative was a result of five public meetings held in April to discuss implementation of the 1986 Bond program, wherein citizens articulated strong support for park acquisition and development. Due to the fact that the grant application is due on July 31, 1992, there is an urgency to develop an acceptable conceptual master plan that balances the criteria for a favorable grant application, the long range park development needs of the City, the reality of funding proper maintenance of the development, and the expressed desires of the adjacent neighborhood. citizen input is critical to the development of the master plan; therefore, two neighborhood meetings were held to inform interested parties of the park purchase and grant possibilities and to receive input on how the park is developed. The first meeting on Thursday, June 90 was a brainstorming session /workshop during which citizens were invited to identify what they would ultimately like to see at the park. At the second meeting on Thursday, June 11, staff presented a preliminary conceptual master plan for the park. citizens were then asked to prioritize possible recreation amenities (i.e. trails, playground equipment) to help determine the initial development. A summary of both meetings are included in your backup. 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2519 tij~rldg lb. << G -~3 June 18, 1992 Page - 2 on Friday, June 12, a staff committee, along with Park Board Chair Dalton Gregory, spent several hours playing out various development scenarios to create an overall successful grant proposal that would also satisfy neighborhood needs and City budgets. This draft grant proposal (Attachment 1) which was accepted by the Parks and Recreation Advisory 'Board on Monday, June 15, 1992, includes a community park development off Hobson Lane, a minimal neighborhood park developmeht off Jason Drive near the multi-family neighborhoods, and a concrete trail connecting the two areas. Neighborhood parks are basically an extension of the backyard and provide open space for play, picnic tables and playground equipment for residents within walking distance. A community park serves residents within a much broader service area providing facilities that accommodate a longer stay, which can include parking, restrooms, tennis courts, ballfields, picnic pavilions, playgrounds etc. Also included in the grant proposal is a lake and fishing pier. Although it was not a top priority for the neighborhood, the lake construction will rank very high in the grant criteria as the state gives significant additional points fo•: preserving "wetland" areas and at the same time allows the city to address the existing drainage problem in the floodplain along Teasley Lane. At the recommendation of the Engineering Department, a permanent lake will also serve as a detention pond for water runoff from the Southridge area. During heavy rainfall, the detention pond will hold the water and allow a slower release into the drainage system. While the Board and staff acknowledge from a practical standpoint this proposal cannot fulfill all the desires of the neighborhood, we are excited that we were able to include a very large percentage or thwir tfw lirinotimi, tifauFilly, wiwn (wfilinq with No mrilly diverse opinions and wishes, coupled with our need to fulfill state requirements of the grant, some judgement calls had to be made in order to make this a balanced development that would be received more favorably by the state. Staff did make compromises at the very strong urging from a majority of the citizens regarding extending the trail system. This extension will, of course, affect maintenance costs and, for all intents and purposes, open up the whole park. We clearly realize this is a shift from the original proposal of one 25 acre development within the park. However, it is in resnonse to overwhelming requests to create additional trail miles and provide natural open space areas. This decision to open the park and provide natural areas is predicated on being able to maintain these areas at Class D level (NO mowing) and the continued support from the City Council if there is pressure from citizens to upgrade the maintenance in these areas at a later date. June 34, 1992 Page - 3 At their meeting on June 15, 1992, the Parks aid Recreation Advisory Board unanimously recommended to-accept the gran proposal Although the overall sentiment was to proceed with o>ment, there were concerns expressed by residents in aps ark submitted. devel the attendance at the meeting as outlined in two arpl Board dnareas of the concerns included developinge la round facilities Somerather than one, t size oand )Positionyto fencing yof any portion of if two are built, strong pp the park, and the omission of an athletic field from the oinitial ssibl, optionsmare Provided for your consideration the following p 1. Submit the grant proposal as recommended by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board July 31, 1992. Impaott if grant is approved, construction could be completed in the summer of 1994. operation and maintenance for FY 1993••94 would ©oal$9ent lof see attached memo from Bob Tickner, Sup Parks. 2, Submit an alternate grant proposal on July 31, 1992, Impacts if grant is approved, cone tion and maintenance would in the summer of 1994. op affected by in FY the 1993-94 e 1 of and the change l from de thelprroposed evel determined by development as shown on the map. 3. Delay the grant submission until January 31, 1993. Impacts if grant is approved, construction could be completed in early 1995. operation and maintenance would not be affected until FY 1994-95, and will be proposed. determined by the degree of development prop Since the matching grant fund is authorized by the State Legislature, it is difficult to preedaifttthyear, stability and e of the gl:ant fro; a tight budget years, as we are particularly during experiencing. 4. Do not submit a grant and construct a partial development with the available $500,000 in 1986 Bond funds. o in Impact perationiandrmaintenancepwould be affected 3 FY 1993-94 and would be determined by the degree of development proposed. Al June 18, 1992 Page - 4 It is our concerns i next dtified , the citizens. number of related identified by several months to bring to the Park Board the following issues or discussion and resolution. • Interim access ion the park after p January 1993 • Fencing a pess • Time line for removal of fence 0 Use of alcohol on par property structures • Design of playground 9 Maintenance coats s Mowing regulations • Overall lighting in the park • Tennis court lighting "Pay-for-Play" * Plans for park if grant application is denied • Current grazing lease on property • Platting strategy In addition to these concerns, there was a considerable amount of discussion at both neighborhood meetings regarding engineering issues. There were concerns of how the construction of lakes and other park development would effect the overall dr inage of the lakes is area. One of the purposes of including detention ponds which will slow runoff and improve downstream ent was drainage. The traffic impact agreed that time periedslo mheaviest also brought up, , although most park use would not conflict with rush hour traffic in the residontial ncrease, as would However I it with acknowledgedeved wolild l i property. Staff will make a full technical presentation Charan proposal at the Work Session, Dalton Gregory, make a presentation. 4 - ~~L r eB:tty Mc an Attachment AJJ003FC June 19, 1992 A(loidaIon) RECOMMENDED GP.ANT PROPOSAL 8110 SOUTH PARK DENTON, TEXAS ESTIMATED cosx TABULAR SUMMARY OF PROJECT ELEMENTS I, eveio Site Plans and Design criteria 89,736 A. Master Site Planning II, Undertake Construction Benin Complete 2 months after 6 months after: project approval project approval 55,000 A. Site Preparation Infrastructure - road improvements, 55,000 flood B. Parking North - 20 spaces 65,000 South - 60 spaces Interior Roads south _ 2001o0e 300000 feet 114,684 20100 C. Utilities - electric, water, and sewer 60,000 D. Buildi,ig Structures 1. Restroom E. Recreation Facilities 84,480 1. Concrete hike and bike trail 8' X 1 mile 30,000 2. soft surface hiking trail 1 mile 100,000 3. Playground structures 40,000 4, 2 Picnic Pavilions 5, picnic Units SNorth 2 outh - 4 91000 80,000 6. Lake 20,000 7. Fishing pier 60,000 8, 2 Tennis Courts 15,000 9, Volleyball Court 35,000 10. Basketball Court 30,000 11. Security Lighting F. Miscellaneous 1. Contingencies, program signs 45.D4Q TOTAL $1,000,000 ATTACHMENT I INITIAL DEVELOPMENT PHASE COWW"Ty"1010,t02d1 DEVRCPNE41 SOUTH PARK r rtie Eavn10P%" N f FORK 1W tIpwa, PRELIMINARY i~ tl lO ~dua6IA 46E 199 ke ~W'0i CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN 00 PkNO Iw.NW E,W0.00V 1. ACINE DIMOVIAHt SEC( , MMOw AME 1002 / .r.x I r wwr tv.+. cou1. 6rM VNlle It CITY OE AFNiON eubmJ Urptlro e•r 0441 PAAKB ANU NEGFlEASION Al+PANIAIFNT O J.y, OCIIpXi 20CEn EE. NMMw ~l lirw AdWi.I. OMAFG rr V MlireenM OwrkE Efill 02r Uw wn r.. xr rw.. r.ruxx x~r.«'Iw .«i..i i~rr'..a. \f/ r...«r.....« x..rr~«.rxn. r,x xxin wr. w.« xr rl x.n •f l' J EW~ wn rlw•x...~rNi..~.wr«r.~,rx..rrnnnr r«.x IM _ In "r ' ~ ~ ~}w~ Oni4~ y 1I` k{ JMMyIMNIr.I ~__.I \ r -0 0 1il j 0000 WOO Of S Ewr+r 1 _ _ U`1i`ti.iw V Ky ~~yV Ir 1 rr'1rf~r~ ~ , '~1 r'i. .r, .w.1r~`;Phrr,'Pr y..~ u'r ~~E teik, Ytv ~ tg.lr r ' ~`t~'hWf'.~iF4 1 v . ~ w Room ATTACHMENT II 4 JJ q ` III ~ II/1 (f 'O)~Jppa~~I I`I`I EYE ~._.~.a.. UL L11 V LI~R.JtF= a UL1^31-_f "A 'In ~`1........._....... v 'Lkaa-._E 11 ~1ED` ~'1 ~.f-_. ~I ~i L, i~ _rl ~I `M`me ~I SHAW OAXI -'lam N ! < ~yw~! tl kS~_ y 1 26 i yy _ lLC ODO M I( 693 rg 761 LowaotR~r PNK I 2944? 593 ~Lj /J{ I E It ~ W ar -"-'t.. t.~+ a r l.IDj, 1410 R rte' 'f F 1 ~ I r 31 it a+~" s~ }lori'E~al~~rv POPULATION TOTALS FACED O N 1990 CENSUS ATTACHMENT III `f I PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MEET' gb" flenr._._ s 5:30 P.M., MONDAY, JUNE 15, 1992 7 SENIOR CENTER 4 MEMBERS PRESENT: Tom Judd, Vice Chairman Catherine Bell Burkley Harkless Neta Stallings STAFF PRESENT: Betty McKean, Executive Director for Municipal Services and Economic Development Bob Tickner, Superintendent of Parks Alicia Mentell, Superintendent of Leisure services Janet Simpson, Park Planning Coordinator Joy Hesch, Administrative Secretary GUESTS PRESENT: 10 Citizens from Neighborhood Adjoining the 200 Acre Park Site in South Denton I. NEETI=Q CALLED TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Tom Judd, Vice Chairman. After the meeting was called to order, Tom presented a plaque to Catherine Bell in appreciation of her dedicated and distinguished service to the citizens of Denton as a member of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board from July, 1986, to July, 1992. This was Catherine's last meeting as a member of the Board. II, APPROVAL, OF MINUTES FROM LAST MEETING, On a motion by Bur kley Harkless, second of Neta Stallings, the minutes of the meeting of May 18, 1992, were approved as written. III. ACTION ITEMS A. Consider a conceptual master plan for the development of the 200 acre South Park. (Janet Simpson) Janet began the discussion by stating that the department had been working hard for the last two months on the master plan for the development of the park. She provided a summary of the process and said the item was on the agenda for this meeting because the deadline for submission of the grant application to Texas Parks and Wildlife was July 31, 1992. A recommendation was needed from the Park Board to be able to proceed with the application. Janet said that two neighborhood meetings had been held at the Southmont Baptist church to receive input from the neighbors for development of the site. The first meeting was held on June 4 with approximately 60 in ATTACHMENT IV MqPPW- WO ~.vs Parks and1992reation Advisory Board Meeting June 15, Page - 2 attendance. There was a strong indication that residents of the neighborhood would prefer passive activities such as open areas, picnic facilities, playgrounds, and trails. other activities such as athletic fields and the infrastructure were also discussed. At the second meeting on June 11, 30 were in attendance. Charts were provided for information which categorized ctctivities suggested at the first meeting as passive/a, estimates for construction Texas level o and intenanfe, grant ranking criteria by Parks r and citizen annual operation and maintenance Were further charted as unstructurpriority.ed The activities , structured activities, water related activities, support, facilities, landscaping/site enhancements, and indoor facilities. Also listed onathe charts were citizen concerns regarding traffic, a in the usa and lighting issues, was ban of for picnic and parks. Again, support playground activities. simi Janet referred to a which Park F nd monies one used in the application Betty for the further development of North Lakes Park. the said the modified infrastructure acostsa rewbasedd would ability to plat the property approval. She said that require Planning and zoning app because the grant application for North Lakes Park faille its first review, some modifications were made. aking to application was successful when esubmit a proposal, she the "mix" of amenities shown on the to do the beet job explained the department is trying or a possible on the application for the South Pee first better chance of it being approved and Betty had submission. Janet said that she, chair, all day Friday, worked with Dalton Gregory, June 12, on the budget to improve the chances of securing the grant on the first try. Tom said the proposed master plan seemed to be balancing act with ate net referred to the conceptual drawing of ranks high. lan which was developed using suggestions the master p made at the neighborhood meeting on June 11. The concept located the entrance to the park opposite oe from The main difference f Hobson theSanta Mon ig inalcf concept wase• the positioning the recreation center and the tennis courts. ThlaeOround included dirt pathways through gC coo ded areasems, outdoor picnic areas, sand volleyball, program area, open play unlighted athletic fields, + wildflowers, bandshell// amophitheatre area, five parking areas, and retention ponds. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting June 15, 1992 Page - 3 Janet said the Engineering Department had indicated1/2a2 improvements to Teasley would possibly Occur in 1-- be years, and at that time, curb' 'cuts could possibly included in the improvements. e of for retention ated that a recommendation ranksp Janet indic use that c very had been included tte beca when they are considering ring the grant high with the appi.irations. ion the HobsonoLane Janet said the department cf development • neighborhood park type well as the Jason Drive se with side of the acreage a This will pro vide additiona laccess park Board approval. She said that at the me to the Park as many as points in tr g at citizens had indicated they wanted of possible. The initial plans were to develop a mile and to trail from Hobson Lane to Teasley Lane Londonderry. olic Betty told the Board it would be a question of Police to be devel oped. regarding the type of traslto whether the trail should seemed to be a controversy trail is soft trail or one of concrete. If the be a a mountain bike could be used, but during soft, possibly wet times, more people would not be able to use the trail. Bicycle use during bad weather would cause dangerous ruts and drive maintenance costs up. If concrete is used in the construction, the trail would be usable in all kinds of weather anare~ sd with astrullersg diverse populations such as epee, and all other types wheelchairs, toddlers with tricY he of bicycles. Not only doer, the concrete surface opeen n the e trail up more readily to the handicapped, of days maintenance free surface on ssedmby citizens that asphalt the year. It had been dangerous to walk or jog on, be a deteriorates and is then n particularly for the el foot trail would oen would up the prime issue since an eight whole park. The conceptual drawings indicated the development of 18 acres on the south side of the si'ce and seven acres on the north side. it the fence were maintenance would removed be which wo impacted. open it the whole the Board, Bob gave a briefing on As directed by y maintenance issues. concerns Bob said the department was aware of the, ma new facior lities. The regarding maintenance when building budget as and a maintenance repyiofo class, would the classifications. would be e prepared Pared on the basis Norida No Agenda IWm__ S Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting June 15, 1992 .page - 4 The classes were as follows: Class A Mainteena days Mowing - Once every fi er day i 6 to 7 days per Litter Control - once p week per day Restrooms - No less than once p Floral Plantings - Two seasonal rotations irrigation plantsband ttiz f in lush condition C ss ai ten_.nre Mowing - once every io working days Litter Control - Serviced two times per week or as needed per week Restrooms - Serviced five times P Floral Plantings - Only perennials or flowering trPA.s/shrubs mai Irrigation - As plant gded to rowth fornactivitytain ~ta~ sy e C tenance - Usually once per month or every 20 mowing working `deay.Ys low level, once per year Litter Control or if reported Restrooms - Normally not available have Floral Plantings . None wildflowers may Irrigation - Not irrigated The Class h maintenance would be used for the entrance area along the 1.2 mile trail or 35 acres areas. The a maintenance. The would be maintained in the Class B YP costs remaining h acres would The be maintaestimatedined as annual Class C (see attached ed ordinance). are: Class A - $ 4,400 Class S - 86,175 Class C - 5,943 - Total $96,518 would the Bob responded that maint Tom asked enance that if cost $ the 6,trai 1751 is concrete why it will irrespective of the material of the trail, security equir would be mowed and require an additional of aches txailnd including lighting, the sides and policing. edgedt litter control, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting June 15, 1992 4...... A,-3 Page - 5 The following are other options,which may be considered: Fence 200 acres with no development, and no public use until 1994 $ 21400 Fence 180 acres, develop 17 acres Car public use in 1994 $45,245 Fence 175 acres, or develop 25 acres with three public access areas $64,600 Betty eAplained the serious maintenance dilemma that opening up additional park land would cause. The City will be facing budget cuts, and Parks and Recreation will not have additional funding for crews and equipment. Neta asked if part of the undeveloped property would be fenced. Bob replied that some type of barrier could be created to discourage vehicle access. However, there would be costs associated with constructing any new fences. The City would probably not lease 'the unused portions to a citizen. Janet said the cattle lease that is in effect now would probably not be renewed since it is not a significant revenue producer. Janet summarized the master plan for the southern portion of the park as follows: i;ard hiking/biking trail - 1 mile Soft surface trail (pedestrian only) - 1 mile playground area Picnic pavilion Picnic units (4) Sand volleyball Tennis Courts (2) Interior road The master plan for facilities adjacent to Jason Drive would include a playground, picnic units, and parking inside the property. citizen concerns and policy issues were: Lighting, pay-for-play at the tennis courts Lighting issues Construction materials for playground equipment Removal of fence What to do if grant not approved Tom commented that the Board was dealing with the initial phase of development only. The later phases would Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting June 15, 1992 5/l0 Page - 6 include the items which had been left out. He wanted the citizens to realize that the complete development will take a long time, possibly several years. Catherine said that she had not been at the neighborhood meetings but was concerned that, as had happend with the development of the Martin Luther King, Jr. Center and Park, the Board would vote on things only to be cut dues to budget constraints. She wondered if that would happen in this development. a Burkley asked what the source of funding would be for the development. Betty said the City will attempt to use the $500,000 of Bond funds to obtain matching funds from the state. without the grant, a lower level. of development could possibly occur. If the City Council decides to proceed with the grant application and it is subsequently not approved by the state, the Board will be asked u hecanr be delay construction so the grant applicati submitted a second time. Neta asked if it would be possible to rise half of the funds for development noa matching the other half for leverage in applying for grant. Betty said the $500,000 cannot be used before the grant is considered. Bob built prior to the gr nt they would not be con idered. At this point, Tom asked. the citizens who were present if they would like to make any comments and asked that they limit their comments to five minutes. An individual said he felt the park ehould be left in its natural state, that it would be ludicrous to mow the whole park, that it would create an ecological imbalance. He suggested that hundreds of trees should be planted. Janet responded that a mile had been set aside for soft trails and a mile would be paved to accommodate the strollers. she individuals, th t tricycles, , handicapped one of and city's Further, p are requirements as part of sidewalk p alongn then street.ughfThe is for a p Engineering Department had indicated they would consider the paved trail The access trail would fulfilling satisfy both the publlic Therefore, as well as engineering requirements. Betty said the City is trying to do as many of the citizen's wants as well as meeting grant requirements. J i , some mom 1l l MOORE n+vESrACNr cawJwr, rRUSrEe VOLL4W 2540, PAGE 729, REAL PROPERTY RfCOROS 1 MJM' +I , J 1 1 3 ~ r 1 ~ - I ED GE ERA RE /L - wi IMII 1 /f r J ae w 47.720 e ro. u J t. r o r a m J - .1 U1 ati S J ' s 1 i is, x. 4 * 1~ Y -mot V. Y ~ 11 i. _ a• r 1 _r - z ~1 a~ ti ArM . r. s f - r a. ' c i ~ al z ii • i , Sk - 1 ii e~ i P~or M1 i ~ ~p 1 r { - F L~1 5S c 'A~ i 1 L V! "fir xtESS llAll tt k 0.8496 AORE soon sr t~ntasrr to 3 EASE IT. ' f 40 1 ti } fl7drr~n rs' I ur 2 e taLu» r r•rGv . 1 •i to, svrLUr sfrGt , I „ • cart rotf..~'.~-r.,, . • r J 6 1' 9/d MNr e . a r~ ncr M N 81' 42^''51' N lSM.43' rrfr is, s~ rsfr[e MET &Cps M' R7 ry. I f) S r afru_ cara+fn c`ree uw aurrfR rR Y FRcwosFo cc,;; cur Ewrm Urc ua+r ♦ WEsr souse- cow'Wrf aye iav surrn+ • ,~pp ~qv ~p S! r~,}.~ .554 . Nra rAT[ MMfi r 1 t# M"A r ch r earn ccoinwre am run rLrrfl4 1'&A& VTfSrAr pur e ° - i r i• _ S 1 1 Y Yt ]RECEIVED - r MAY 2 1~~ F i } ♦ . Q 1 'pufit,INS i tEVELOPMENT 1MENTf 1 o ro .a ~4 coq I-V ew I I PRELIMINARY REPLA T OF, 4:276 A~S~ ~LOT IR AM LOT 2R BLOCK ! &Rkl' W SCALE • Pal 01MH JAC, 1 AL VNV AND CHARLOTTE WHALEY ,A MhON CITY AND COMFY QF DENMA4 1'LXAS. ` L K. y ' CKO By . a DATE REVISIONS ,4C fi r i, I ~ I 1' i i iiu / 1 - t J s l i ♦ •r Y 4 i 1 Q ~ y 'f'tJ ♦ i '1 4 { PAYJ! OR 3` fit lilt ~ 1 Z ~RE 1 ~r _ I ZONED too ~41 1 Aµ,'CA~ES ES G ~ P~E~cM EE ~s ~ * ~,s~, ,~t,• ZONED 5 f , Q OL.0G ESIAtEs ti Z SITE QC . i ARll i ILLi RQ l \ OL y , , -rim f-, ■ Fir 2 r3,~,~, gEWAY p64 GmN6 1.".. ED GR a 1 u ZO i• ro~ssl f S H , VoL,a, R. ,gar{I 4A r V , f F ~J so' +E 52823 ,,rod TRACT aptreoAy 14 Ro. M of ~r i OR O Cv1 z ~r 3 v :M VICINITY" MA ILI, ii u ' • a /'/r~S (kt moo MMES s co. sr ' a e 4 ~J r J 1 !t •i r rs sera s GR ~r 1 1I ~ i r ZD GR + 1 r~ . ~ rl I 1 1-~~1 •A y ' t y 1 ♦ ~P k / N 87' 7150 4 0161 S 87575 4 6 1 s tom RRCs 1~s fJ , • . • • , ,tit;. ?oW MAY2t2 r s ?r Er,u. JKANNING A DEVEI.OPAtGNV DEPARTMENT • ~ ~ ralas~c r ~ ~ + + F w r.v ZK mar sEn g i Mu. dux ruu r I DENTON, TEXAS 76202 (817) 382-5421 LO ! A TOM JESTER A PAUL HAYWOOD ~ v 515 SOUTH CARROLL 8(,VD. ALE ADDN MoA4E rrvESrMExrs co,, rRUSr DENTON, TEXAS 76201 (817) 387-7585 p~ L t; MOORE a • A (01,76 r 4,7686 ACRES C I PR pq~ ~ SED ~AJ4~t R ~?~w ~s ZONED + N COMMA • 1f COMMERC ZONED C rl - t ~fl~ oz n _~MrMGKO AMYA K UjW LEGEND FND' I,P, . FOUND IRON, PIN TOWN sra~ e P to p SET IRON PIN ! ow F hoodf CI,rCENTERLINE 1 i PROPE"Y LINE - 125s~ ' I EASEMENT'LINE - - I R i BUILDING LINE ---8b ~ra,e496c~ w is ~ Ana .IiTHE X X ' ~asrnK, 10' CONTOM LINE --i*- , r ASPHALT (ASPH) CONCRETE (CONC) +«:~:a~.r11 . , , DOILDINL' WALL " r.... t r - POWER POLE -Q P/P' rr FIRE ` HYDRANT + FH r Y- WATER VALVE HVV a.r~w'rrat~' MANHOLE • MH DEED BEARINGS M w- j_ 3 r, si too SO 0 100 Zf►0 301 ` J SCALE IN FEET v rop+osarr or pavraN roPO wts h 1 , DMM, J r...._...._ . 11f1 R CKa DATE - - By J-J~IR -tea mot, 7- T 1~- I i 1 I L~ ■ lC e. l l 1 + r I 1 r^~~ J D \ Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting June 15, 1992 Page - 7 Every attempt is being made to both maximize the grant's successful considerations as well as the largest number of citizen priorities. Bob stated that once an activity is included and people begin to use it, then maintenance and liability concerns arise. A citizen asked if a paved trail was one of the prerequisites for the state grant and if that is what would be presented to Council. She also asked where the soft trail and the paved trails would be located. Janet said trail would be from Hobson to Teasley to Jason. An individual said that she had understood at the last neighborhood meeting that only one playground was to be developed off Hobson Lane, but now the city was proposing a second playground on the north side. She said the new proposal would be splitting the money into two developments. She suggested that with two playgrounds the maintenance costs would be increased and the major playground development (Robert Leathers) would be jeopardized. She also stated her discomfort with dividing the dollars and providing a playground for use by the residents in the apartment buildings on the north side of the park since they were transients. Janet said the purpose of two playgrounds was to serve a large part of the citizenry in tlie area who may not have transportation to the playground on the south side of the park. At the last neighborhood meeting, some citizens had voiced a concern regarding a playground in their area. Neta stated that if two playgrounds were a problem, was it possible to locate one playground the north end of the park. Tom commented that at the neighborhood meetings concerns had arisen recjaruing the possible traffic congestion along Hobson Lane due to the park entrance. He said that having two playground areas may help to alleviate some of the concerns by allowing access from more than one end of the park. A question was asked regarding when the final decision would be made about whether there would actually be the two playground locations within the park. Bob said the final design would be done after the grant is received (spring of 1994). Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting a 3 ~~i~2 June 15, 1992 Page - Staff was asked if the City always goes with the lowest bid. Bob said the lowest bid is accepted only if the bid conforms to specifications. He explained that we accept the lowest best bid. A question was asked about the timeframe for Phases II and III. Janet said that funding for further development. would probably have to come from future Capital Improvement Programs that would be voted on by the citizens. David Glass expressed a concern that plans for athletic fields had been deleted. He wanted to know if the grant depended on the plan submitted. Betty agreed that while staff had noted the citizens' desires for playing fields, there was a concern that their inclusion might hurt the grant's chances. She further explained that this was a staff judgement call because we had yet to complete the athletic fields under the existing park grant at North Lakes. She said staff was concerned that it might not look favorable to ask for more fields when the authorized ones had yet to be built. She also told him that, unfortunately, practice fields require nearly the same level of maintenance as league- play fields. Bob said the City already has a grant for ballfields at North Lakes Park and felt the state would not rank highly another plan for athletic fields. At this point, Tom said the chair was open for a motion. Neta moved that the Board recommended that Council accept the proposed conceptual master plan and initial facility development. Burkley seconded the motion, and the motion was passed with a unanimous vote. B. Consider a resolution supporting a Texas Parks and Wildlife grant application for development of the 200 acre South Park. (Janet Simpson) Janet said the Board, at its meeting on May 18, 19920 recommended that staff proceed with a matching grant application for the development of South Park. The to i indicate and has to be included in resolution is only a tion formality the support of the Park the grant application Board. Catherine moved that the Board adopt a resolution in support of the matching grant for development of the 200 acre South Park. Neta seconded the motion, and the motion was passed with a unanimous vote. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting June 15, 1992 Page - 9 S /7~ C. Consider a development plan for North Lakes Park. (Bob Tickner) Bob presented a drawing of the master plan for the development of North Lakes Park. He said that since notification of the award of $500,000 in matching grant, funds last November for athletic field development at North Lakes, an archaeological survey has been completed. The project design is now being finalized and will be submitted to Texas Parks and wildlife later this month for review. If there are not a lot of revisions, construction could possibly start in November. IV. Qiscussion Items A. Discuss Civic Center pool renovation. (Janet Simpson and Bob Tickner) Janet said that in 1991 the Park Board recommended a CIP project for renovation of the Civic center pool. Discussions were held with Council regarding building an indoor/outdoor pool. Subsequently, Council directed staff to look at what could be done in repairing the current pool. An architect was hired who presented three options. Council wanted more specifics on what was planned, and at council's recent retreat, staff presented a report on proposals for a phased renovation. Janet reviewed the report with the Board. Phase lA would be for critical mechanical repairs only and would cost approximately $294,600. Phase 1B would cover the construction of pool buildings, restoration of pool equipment furniture, replacing wood and chain link fencing, eliminating two on-street parking lots and adding a 5o space parking lot in Civic Center Park, and the addition of a toddler pool. This phase will cost approximately $314,400 for an overall cost for Phase 1A and 1B of $609,000. Tom commented that he recalled Norm saying the pool piping system would not accommodate a six hour filtering system. Janet said that the new piping would be contained in the guttering system. Janet continued that Phase II would convert the existing pool into a zero depth pool, and Phase III calls for expansion of the pool facility with a new competitive pool in Civic Center Park. Janet said that at the Council retreat, Council had identified funding and instructed staff to do an architectural study for Phase 1A. Staff will be sending Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting June 15, 1992 Page - 10 out Requests for Proposals soon with construction on Phase lA to be started immediately after the current pool season ends. V. Informational Items Betty said that the recruiting process for the director's position had begun. The announcement would close. in August, and it is hoped that a new director would be selected by sometime in the fall. r Alicia provide the Hoard with clippings from the Dallas Morning News regarding the free food program which had been served that over 3t 0 lunches arembethe ing federal estalished governments by the daily. The date for the July meeting was discussed. Tom Judd said he would be unable to attend the meeting if it was held on the regularly scheduled date of July 20. Janet said that possible agenda items would include After School Action Site issues, alcohol consensus sofethin the e Board as parks, to schedule the next issues. for and ossibly July 13. Tom said that as chairman of the Park Naming Committee he had received commitments from the following individuals to serve on the committee. They are Harold Perry, Jane Hopkins, Mayor Castleberry, Linda Eaddy, Loyce Wilson, and Popo Gonzales. '..ri LS.- VI. Other Issues consisting of items and concerns brought by citizens, staff, and Board members on which no action will be taken. VII. Ad ou on a motion by Neta Stallings, second of Burkley Harkless, the meeting was adjourned. AJJ003F7 Agenda Nnnt__ June 18, 1992 D L~~ IMPORTANT DATES AND DEADLINES Neighborhood Meeting June 4 and June 11 Park Board June 15 City council June 23 Grant Application Due July 31 Cattle Grazing Lease January 11 1993 Expires Grant Review Complete January 31, 1993 If Grant is Approved Archaeological study February, 1993 is I n i t i a t e d, Beginning of Design Phase Archaeological Study August, 1993 and Design Phase 1 Completed .a'.ftrhw}Y Construction Phase November, 1993 Begins Initial Construat.ion June, 1994 Complete i~ SUMMARY OF PUBLIC MEETING Alcnda Ilarn____---a- SOt7THMONT BAPTIST MIURCH l>+lu^ r "2 TMMSDAY, JUNE 4, 1992 Council Members Present: Eulins Brock Jane Hopkins Jack Miller Park Board Members Present: Tom JuddStallings~ Chair Neta Staff Present: Betty McKean, $eervices and Economic Development Bob Tickner, Superintendent of Park Coordinator Janet Simpson, Park Planning Joy Hesch, Administrative Secretary The meeting began at 7pm with approximately 56 citizens present in and addition to Council and f athe Board meeting wassto receive inputyforKthe explained the purpose development of the newly acquired park property in South Denton. A question was asked regarding the existing facilities at Denia Park. Staff responded with the following: It Recreation Center • Soccer Fields • Softball Fields • Playground • Picnic Area • Tennis Court • Basketball ♦ Restrooms • Trail • Parking The following are items which were suggested by the citizens for development of the property. • Walking/jogging trails with short. cuts • Landscaped area - community garden ♦ Bike trail with mile markers, benches, and 911 phone ♦ Wildflowers • Water fountain ♦ Par course ♦ Restroom • Playground - toddler ♦ open space • Driving range rills • Picnic area with tables, g • Pavilion • Natatorium • Increase water area • Fishing nati!~e • Arboretum _ • Sand volleyball • Bandshell Trees for buffer - boulders ♦ Forrestridge entrance • Non tournament athletic fields ATTACHMENT V Aocnda No.._-----.. A9anda [toll1-- Page - 2 Fountain - water feature Large open spaces for hot ai balloons soccer fields - youth and p la • Basketball - lighted, paY flap Y • Tennis - liactivitiay for p y Youth play i ment Recreation center - exercise equ p • Softball Batting cage The following were concerns and policy issues: • Traffic - parking (interior) off park road hide parking Hobson improvements • Lighting issues _ Montecito Lake Drainage - silting Parking No alcohol a taken into eon said all the suggestiOng would b Janet Simp resented at the follow- consideration and a on tThursday$ WJune bu P 1992, at 7pm in up public metistgChurch. southmont Bap pLF718E SIGN YOUR NAME r YOUR ADDRESS r AND YOUR PHONE pAD RESS RiONE NO. /4'/1 k- 4-!l I v~ne_✓__ S~o~Pa~2~e 566 3 3 3 o It Ad It Art /lie J4 fs 5, S-8G9~ J Nti, L ,s -777 j :33?. 17 v 2 061 Pfio 07 c.1a~ ~c•L~ 4. C\ LJGZJt~ ~ i Z Sixb S 3~ z y Z Z L G zc -Z (o S4 U ?O F/ 7 Gr/ 5 . PLEASE SIGN YOUR NAKED YOUR ADDRESS. UM YOUR P$QNE^' p v?✓ a ADDRESS PHONFa NO- u 32 G G V II 5o , 4.Y(. ~v7 " 2M Z a 66 - 377 / ~ L ~ r r 3 le!' O~ Agenda Itnal wS. °t SUMMARY OF PUBLIC MEETING q- h`n ONT BAPTIST CHURCH _ SOUTHM 1992 THURSDAY, JUNE 13, Eulina Brock Council Members Present: Dalton Gregory, Chair Tom Judd, Vice Chair park Board Members Present-* Director for Municipal : Betty McKean, Executive Development Staff Present services and Economic Bob Tickner, Superintendent of Parks inator Park Planning CO Eng Janet Simpson, ineering David Salmon, Civil Engineer, Department Joy Hesch, Administrative Secretary citizens present. The meeting began at -IPM with approximately 31 would begin itublia meeting f on Betty McKean explained the meeting process tor those persons who were not at the public June 4. suggestions made by , Janet reviewed the suggthat since the After introductory cometentuhslic meeting. She said "passive" Citizens at the last P been to develo pinto suggestions had been categorized overwhelming desire of citizens had ities first, all their water related activities, amen )Port facilities. 'These had been further structured and unstrrndtsupp activities, sea attached charts). indoor f«Cilities, rant rank, categorized as passive and active level ofBmaintenanca, g She explained construc and maintenance costs. and annual operations entire 200 A proposed long range conceptual master plan systemfor, the Playgrounds, then presented including a tennis trail courts, basketball couit acres was i.cnic pavilions, lakes, fishing pier, picnic tables, P s aCej wildflower areas tournament unlighted sand volleyball, open P bandshell, non- Janet discussed arboretum area, restrooms, center. noted and n recreation in the floadplain and traits, and some athletic athletic fields, development plan doinaluded rovaI from TEMA and the Army Corps proposed osed that r the restrictions 1 000,000 woul V~dabYiTexas allowed fields which ar,Tanet said aft ti p ark a grant is app would be par of Engineers. ent of the breakdown of sources rant ofd$5001000. A Eor initial development parks and Wildlife. It was $500,000 from 1986 Bond funds and a ture may interior roads. explained liminary that estimate of a asiarki q astruc costs w aturetcosts pre utility servi0 , P infrastru including the balance after subvalop e izens Is what would be used for initial de so P sited from the Vifuture and V8stions were then regarding on ask, the north side of the Suggestions lan. A question was regarding the master partment building ound and picnic facilities near the apartment Janet said that there ~ogpacee a ne ydistanae of trail ccess to property. restroom, and oPe ergs, parking It was stahe exactadistance from Jason Drive was also ddsatsJas°n although the trail would be provide had not been determined ATTACHMENT VI Summary of the Public Meeting June 11, 1992 y~ Page - 2 A concern was expressed about the entrance to the park off Hobson Lane between Forrestridge Drive and Santa Monica. There were pros and cons voiced as to whether the entrance should line up with Forrestridge or Santa Monica. David Salmon addressed this concern stating that no plans ha-' been made for widening Hobson Lane in the near future. After a lengthy discussion, the consensus was to place a park entrance opposite Santa Monica. Questions were raised regarding pedestrian access on Teasley. It was suggested that a small parking lot would be necessary across from Longridge on Teasley. Some of the citizens were concerned that the proposed parking spaces would not be enough in the park and that cars would park on the streets. Engineering and Parks staff agreed that an additional lot was feasible on Teasley. Additional questions were directed to David Salmon regarding traffic counts on Hobson Lane, improvements on Ryan Road, increased traffic on Hobson and Teasley Lanes, and drainage issues. Janet Simpson indicated that development of the lakes would improve the drainage in the area by detaining the runoff and releasing it slowly into the system. Citizens were requested to prioritize facilities for the initial park development that would be funded, if approved, through the Local Park Fund matching grant. Again, passive, unstructured activities were given first priority including trails, playgrounds, picnic facilities, and open space. Restroom~ also rated high as a support facility to the park. .._o There was lengthy discussion regarding the trail system. Citizens stressed that they wanted as much trail length as possible; there were suggestions of up to three miles. Janet stated that within a limited development, it would be difficult to include a long trail and that doing so would cause much more of the park to be opened. She explained the mandate to restrict initial development to no more than 25 acres due to a need to hold maintenance costs in check. The discussion continued with citizens urging a longer trail length and their insistence that money could be saved if it were a soft surface trail, rather than concrete. Janet indicated that regardless of the material used to construct the trail, a long trail would require more land and would drive maintenance costs up. Dalton Gregory then added that maintenance was a concern since no additional maintenance funds or personnel had been allocated to date for this park. He stated that while the Board and staff would also like to be able to open the entire park, it simply did not appear to be feasible at this time due to maintenance funding constraints. He explained that opening up more of the park was not a decision the staff or Board could make. Budgetary considerations would have to be authorized by the City council. summary of the public Meeting (1110. June 11, 1992 Page - 3 There was discussion regarding a playground. Staff had identified $50,000 for the structure. It was suggested that if a Robert Leathers playground were constructed that'$100,000 would be needed. Some citizens present expressed that the $100,000 figure was excessive for a playground. After some discussion, staff used the $100,000 amount as a base figure that could be modified if needed.,' After prioritizing and costing out the desired passive amenities, consideration was then given to structured and active facilities. r Citizens identified two tennis courts and discussed the issue of lighting the courts. There was a suggestion of "pay for play" coin operated lighting. There were also concerns about any lighting in the park other than security lighting that might disturb neighboring residents. Basketball courts and a sand volleyball court were also given as a priority in the initial development as activities that would attract adolescent and teen participants. A discussion of including some athletic field development for practice was considered as a temporary facility. The facility would be located in the area designated for a future recreation center. There was some support for athletic field development in the initial phase due to demand. others expressed concerns regarding additional congestion that would be created if athletic fields were placed near the park entrance. After the completion of facility discussion and attendant costs, there was a balance of approximately $250,000 remaining from the $1,000,000 budget. Citizens reaffirmed their major priorities of trails and plai-grounds. Suggestions were made that those remaining funds might be used to develop more park acreage. Other suggestions included development of the lake area with a fishing pier, establishment of wildflowers, and athletic practice/non- tournament fields for soccer, T-ball, and baseball. Staff summarized the }process stating that the plan would be finalized and a budget prepared for the grant application. This rickage would be presented to the Park Board on June 15 and to City council on June 23. The fact that those meetings are open to the public was emphasized. The meeting was then closed. AJJ003F'3 A(Ioinda No dO /9 PLEASE SIGN YOUR NAME, YOUR ADDRESS, AND YOUR PHONE N~~IR•_ /v._'p?3 7 Lea NAME/J JJ ADDRESS PHONE NOL .2//~' SG6 3 3 7_ ,a-, ~eura~'zr~n, S° ~~f~rtv~Ea1 Cr•~+~ S~S-9~~~ I y z- i j%a 6-1 .3 q ~7- 9f7- 06 M ,duos 5 .0 C' Rct -e2: 1110 1 1 c~ w ~iUl rCCtc~ -3,~3 -,50 / l oD ZT, ~ Rp,r Sa31 k ~ tN7 1 ?r 3 cg ` C 1~nC11 (J i1 ~~Clll__- ray. ^«.:sw..~ PLEASE SIGN YOUR NAMEf YOUR ADDRESSe AND YOUR PAONS N 'G gya'y_2~'~ v ADDRESS FHOr NO_ NAME - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r Julie 11, 3,992 SOUTH PARK DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES AT THE JUNE 11, 1992 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS UNSTRUCTURED ACTIVITIESa ANNUAL PASSIVE/ CONSTRUCTION LEVEL OF GRANT OPERATIONS/ CITIZEN FACILITY ACTIVE COST MAINTENANCE RANK MAINT. COSTS PRIORITY PLAYGROUND PASSIVE $ 50,000 CLASS B HIGH $ 3,200 ROBERT LEATOERS PASSIVE $ 50,000 CLASS B HIGH $ 3,700 PLAYGROUND PICNIC UNITS, TABLE, PASSIVE $ 11500 CLASS B MEDIUM $ 11350 CONCRETE PAD, GRILL, TO LOW AND TRASH RECEPTACLE PICNIC PAVILION PASSIVE $ 35,000 CLASS B MEDIUM $ 3,100 (WITH 10 TABLES) TO LOW r TRAIL SYSTEM - PASSIVE $110,000/ CLASS B HIGH $ 1,090/mile MILE AND C C1 n - NATURE $ 5,220/mile - WALKING/JOGGING lighted N N LIGHTED PAR COURSE PASSIVE $ 15,000 CLASS B MEDIUM $ 31200 y I pt AJJ003E? June il, 199?. STRUCTURED ACTIVITIESi ANNUAL PASSIVE/ CONSTRUCTION LEVEL OF GRANT OPERATIONS/ CITIZEN ACTIVE COST MAINTENANCE RANK MAINT. COSTS PRIORITY FACILITY ACTIVE $ 70,000 CLASS B MEDIUM $ 11500 TENNIS COURTS PER 2 COURTS $ BASKETBALL COURTS ACTIVE $ 35x000 CLASS B MEDIUM 850 CLASS B LOW $ 850 SAND VOLLEYBALL ACTIVE $ 15,000 COURTS ACTIVE $ 37,000 CLASS B MEDIUM $ 1,500 UNLIGHTED SOCCER FIELDS CLASS B MEDIUM $ 2,000 UNLIGHTED SOFTBALL ACTIVE $70,000 FIELDS CLASS A LOW $40,000 DRIVING RANGE ACTIVE $100,000 Fd I N f LOW $30,000 v ACTIVE $100,000 CLASS A BATTING CAGE 50,000 CLASS B LOW $ 1,300 t BANDSHELL ACTIVE $ $.ii0hted 2 ~ 1~ June 110 ,1992 WATER RELATED ACTIVITIES: ANNUAL PASSIVE/ CONSTRUCTION LEVEL OF GRANT OPERATIONS/ CITIZEN FACILITY ACTIVE COST MAINTENANCE RANK MAINT. COSTS PRIORITY FISHING PIER PASSIVE $ 20,000 CLASS C HIGH $ 1,500 EXPANDED WATER' PASSIVE $250,000 CLASS C MEDIUM $ 250/ SURFACE acre AJJ003E2 ~z n W N f Itl O 3 June 11., 1992 SUPPORT FACILITIES: ANNUAL FAE VE/ CONSTRUCTION LEVEL OF GRANT OPERATIONS/ CITIZEN FACILITY COST MAINTENANCE RANK MAINT. COSTS PRIORITY PARK FURNITURE N/A CLASS B LOW - DRINKING FOUNTAIN $ 21500 $ 150 BENCHES $ 600 $ 25 - TRASH RECEPTACLES $ 300 $ 15 - GRILLS $ 250 $ 25 - SIGNS $ 1,200 $ 250 RESTROOMS N/A $ 75,000 CLASS B LOW $ 21000 INFRASTRUCTURE N/A CLASS B LOW $ 11000/ $ 5.20/ - PARKING SPACE - ROADS $60/LINEAR space FOOT - UTILITIES $30,000 SECURITY LIGHTS $6,000/ $ 150/ 1 _1_ LIGHT light SITE PREPARATION * N/A $ 50,000 N/A LOW IRRIGATION N/A $ 5,000/ CLASS A LOW $ 500/ ACRE AND B N d acre _ ~ ~a o *Sits preparation includes rough and fine grading for initial site development. ~(a► U - kn uric 11, 1992 LANDHCAPING/BITE ENHANCEMENTS: - ANNUAL LEVEL OF GRANT OPERATIONS/ CITIZEN PASSIVE/ CONSTRUCTION ACTIVE COST MAINTENANCE RANK MAI:NT. COSTS FACILITY PRIORITY CLASS A LOW $10,000/acre LANDSCAPED AREA - PASSIVE VARIES - ;25,000+ COMMUNITY GARDEN CLASS B LOW $ 60/acre WILDFLOWERS PASSIVE $ 20500 CLASS A LOW $120/acre ARBORETUM - NATIVE PASSIVE $751000+ CLASS B LOW $ 8/tree TREES FOR BUFFER - PASSIVE $50,000 BOULDERS CLASS A LOW FOUNTAIN - WATER PASSIVE $20,000 FEATURE AJJ003E2 D N (p C1 5 June 11, 1992 INDOOR FACILI'2IESi ANNUAL CITIZEN PASSIVE/ CONSTRUCTION LEVEL OF GRANT OPERATIONS/ COST PRIORITY FACILITX ACTIVE MAINTENANCE RANK MAINT. CLASS A LOW $100,000 NATATORIUM ACTIVE $2,0001000 LOW $100,000 RECREATION CENTER ACTIVE $1,400,000 CLASS A WITH EXERCISE EQUIPMENT CITIZEN CONCERNS AND POLICY ISSUES: t TRAFFIC ISSUES DRAINAGE ISSUES ALCOHOL BAN LIGHT'IWG ISSUES (U AJJ003E2 (:3 CL f.L N tL • i4 O 3 ' ~Tl 1 6 WVV ~r A0on0 No. -D/e___ Agenda [life JV CITY of DENTDN, TEXAS MUNICIPAL 6UILDING / 215 E MGKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 M E M O R A N D U M r TO: Betty McKean, Executive Director for Municipal Services and Economic Development FROM: Bob Tickner, Superintendent of Parks DATE: June 18, 1992 SUBJECT: Maintenance Impact Study for the New South Park (Teasley at Hobson) In an effort to provide a picture of what kind of impact the maintenance and operation will be to the City budget, I have analyzed several options based on how the park could be used. These costs are based on local and regional cost data. The numbers reflect a fairly accurate representation of what it will cost for both direct and indirect labor, special projects, special events, and small. construction improvements that are performed by maintenance crews. Each hark site is different and usage levels are different, making it, difficult to put a figure on a proposed site specifically, Approximate costs per acre for each level of service is based on our current budget. We feel this site will become one of the most heavily used parks due to its location in the city, its proximity to active neighborhoods, and many residents who have not used park facilities before will begin to take advantage because of the convenience to recreation facilities. From the neighborhood meetings and staff analysis, the proposed development plan for 25 acres with a connecting hard surfaced trail of eight acres will be as follows: ATTACHMENT V11 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 0110 June 18, 1992 Page - 2 Recommended Proposal ($11000,000 development): Service Level Class A Areas - Park entrances, landscaped beds, .44 acres $ 40400 Class B Areas - Two general park facilities areas, roads, parking, hard trails, 34.47 acres 96,175 Class C Areas - 16 acres, maintained as required by ordinance 11536 Class D Areas - 149.09 acres, natural areas, 4.407 soft trail area Total Maintenance Impact $96,518 Although another option may be less desirable from the citizen view point, the following proposal will reduce maintenance and operation costs. Class A Areas - Park entrance landscape bids .33 acres $ 3,300 Class B Areas - One 17 acres general park area - 1.2 mile eight acres hard surface trail 62,500 Class C Areas - 16 acres, maintained as required by ordinance 10536 Class D Areas - 149,09, natural areas, 4,407 soft trail area Total Maintenance Impact $710 743 The reduced maintenance option is predicated on the elimination of the north end park/playground area in Phase I (See Attached Maintenance Standard Classification Schedule for explanation of service levels) Also, a lower service level. may be assigned to specific areas to reduce the maintenance impact. There must be a clear understanding on the public's part that a majority of the acreage mill be left in a natural and an unmowed (Class D) state. The dejartment will M~mt)a No. ' Agenda LI? June 19, 1992 Page - 3 be unable to respond to special maintenance requests without council support future budgets. We ;eel confident that these costs accurately reflect our minimum on-site as well as indirect off-site support costs for operation and maintenance. Please contact me if you have any further questions. Robert ✓K. T ckner AJJ003FE Agonda Pao. Awenda gem.~ s' CITY OF DENTON / to p lp.: SX1 PARKS AND RECREATION - MAINTENANCE STANDARD CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE Class A Maintenancq 1. Turf Care: Grass cut once every five working days. Aeration as required but not less than two time per year. Reseeding or sodding when bare spots are present. Weed control practiced when weeds present visible problem or when weeds represent five percent of the turf surface. 2. Fertilization: ` Adequate fertilizer level to ensure that all plant materials are healthy and growing vigorously, Application rate to be three or more times per year. 3. Irrigation: Irrigation system will be available. Frequency of use follows rainfall, temperature, seasonal length and demands of plant material. 4. Litter Control: Once per day or five days per week. 5. Pruning: Usually done at least once per season unless species planted dictates more frequent attention, Sculptured hedges or high growth species may dictate a more frequent requirement. 6. Disease and Insect Control: Usually done when disease or insects are inflicting noticeable damage, reducing vigor of plant materials or could be considered a bother to the public. Preventive measures may be utilized. 7. Lighting: Replacement or repair of fixtures when observed or reported as not working. 8. Surfaces: Should be cleaned, repaired, repainted or replaced wk:en appearance has notlQeably deteriorated. 9. Repairs: Should be done whenever safety, function, or bad appearance is in question. rhi~~nd:.t Page - 2 10. Inspection: Inspection by a staff member at least once a day when regular staff is scheduled. 11. Floral Plantings: Some type of floral plantings present. Normally no more complex than two rotations of bloom per year. Care cycle usually at least once per week except watering may be. more frequent. Health and vigor dictate cycle of fertilization and disease control. Beds essentially kept weed free. 12. Restrooms: No less than once per day servicing. Additional service may be required for special events and activities. Class _R Maintenance 1. Turf Care: Cut once every 10 working days. Normally not aerated unless turf quality indicates a need or in anticipation of an application of fertilizer. Reseeding or resodding done only when major bare spots appear. Weed control measures applied three times per year to present a good general turf quality. 2. Fertilizer: a=- Applied only when turf vigor seems to be low. Low level application done twice per year - June and September. 3. Irrigation: Dependent on climate and as budget allows to maintain a general turf quality when rainfall is below 25 inches per year or periods of drought. b. Litter Control: Service of two times per week. High use may dictate higher levels of service during season activities. 5.' Pruning: When required for health or reasonable appearance. 6. Disease and Insect Control: Done only on epidemic or serious complaint 1iasis. thinto effect when reatened or where h publ.icts or Control plant put comfort is concerned. Page - 3 7. Lighting: Replacement or repair of fixtures when report filed. 8. Surfaces: Cleaned on complaint basis. 'Repaired or replaced as budget allows. 9. Repairs: Should be done whenever safety or function is in question. 10. Inspections: once per week. 11. Floral Planting: Only perennials or flowering trees or shrubs. 12. Restrooms: Serviced five times per week. Class C Maintenance 1. Turf Care: Low frequency mowing schedule based on species. Usually once per month or avery 20 working days. Low growing grasses may not be mowed. Weed control limited to legal requirements of noxious weeds. 2. Fertilizer: Not fertilized. 3. irrigation: Not irrigated. 4. Litter Control: Very low level. once per year or on complaint basis. 5. Pruning: No regular trimming. Safety or damage from weather may dictate actual work schedule. 6. Disease and Insect Control.: None except where epidemic conditions exist. /~rncla No. Page - 4 Ali cntla lturtt-___~!/s. =P{ D1 10 7. Lighting: Replacement on complaint or employee discovery. 8. Surfaces: Replaced or required when safety is a concern and budget is available. 9• Repairs: Should be done when safety or function is in question. 10. Inspections: Once per month. 11. Floral Plantings: None. Areas may have wildflowers, perennials, flowering trees or shrubs. 12. Restrooms: When present, serviced five times per week. Class q Mainty ec e 1. Turf Care: Not mowed. Weed control only if legal requirements demand it, 2. Fertilizer: Not fertilized. 3. Irrigation: Not irrigated. 4. Litter Control: On demand or complaint basis, 5.' Pruning: No pruning unless safety is involved. 6. Disease and Insect Control: None except where epidemic conditions exist. A{ ij cfa No..__9e~.'P_ A(IcwJii Page - 5 7. Lighting! Replacement on complaint basis. 8. Surfaces: Serviced when safety is consideration. 9. Repairs: Should be done when safety in question. 10. Inspections: once per month. 11. Floral Plantings: None. 12. Restrooms: When present, service based on need. AJJ00402 Zas § 20.48 DENTOYCODE y f (g) 'rhe procedures in this section shall not apply to a vehicle or vehicle part that is completely enclosed within abuilding in a lawful manner where it is not visible from the street or other public or private property, a vehicle or vehicle pw t that is stored.or parked in a lawful manner on private property in connection with the business of a licensed vehicle dealer or junkyard or an unlicensed, operable or inoperable antique or special interest vehicle stored by a collector on the collector's property, if the vehicle and the outdoor storage area are main- tained in a manner so that they do not constitute a health hazard and are screened from ordinary public view by means of a fence, rapidly growing trees, shrubbery or other appro. priate means. ,h) The procedures in this section shall be administered by regularly salaried, full-time employees of the city except that the removal of a vehicle or vehicle part from property may r be by any duly authorized person. State law reference-Similar provisions, Vernon's Ann. Civ. St. art. 4477.9x, 15.09. Sec, 2049. Disposal of junked vehicles. A junked vehicle or vehicle part may be disposed of by removal to a scrapyard, demolisher or any suitable site operated by the city for processing as scrap or salvage. The process of disposal must comply with the provisions of section 20.48(d). The city may transfer the vehicle or vehicle parts to a disposal site if the disposal is only as scrap or salvage, State law reference-Similar provisions, Vernon's Ann. Civ. St. art. 4477.9a, § 5.10. Sec. 2060. Enforcement. The person authorized by the city council to administer the procedures authorized by this division may enter private property for the purposes speclfi'ed in the procedures to examine a vehicle or vehicle part, obtain information as to the identity of the vehicle and remove or cause the removal of a vehicle or vehicle part that constitutes a nuisance. Secs, 20.51-20.70, Reserved. ARTICLE III. GRASS AND WEEDS' See. 20-71, height limitations on certain weeds, grass and uncultivated vegetation. (e) It shall be unlawful for any person having control or supervision of any lot, tract or parcel of land or portion thereof, occupied or unoccupied, improved or unimproved, within the corporate limits of the city to suffer or permit grass or weeds or oth it vegetation, except agricultural crops, trees, shrubs, flowers or other decorative or ornamental plants under cul, tivation, to grow on an average to a greater height than twelve (12) inches upon such premises or to leave such weeds or grass upon any premises after such weeds or grass have been cut. 'Cross references-Health generally, Ch. 14; housing generally, Ch. 15; solid waste generally, Ch. 24; landscaping, screening and tree preservation generally, Ch. 31. State law reference-Nuisances, V.T,C.A., Health and Safety Coda §'342,001 et seq. 1396 r N'MSANCES § 20- 73 ysY y~ land under e acres of two ingle (b) With respect to lot, tracts this sects nehall not be applicable to herarea in excess of one ownership, the prorown hundred (100) feet from any open public street or way, or to the area in excess of one hundred (100) feet from any adjacent property under different ownership on which habitable dwellings are located. within the (cl The provisions of this article shall be applicable to all railroad rights-of-way city, lot, tract, parcel (d) It shall be the duty of any person having supervision or control of any of land or portion thereof, occupied or unoccupied, improved or unimproved, within the cor• or cause to be removed, if porate limits of the city to cut or cause to be cu4ssan e~ and/or other vegetation as often ' necessary, to comply with this section, all such gr • as may be necessary to comply with the provisions of this section. (Code 1966, § 12.26) to Sec, 20.72, Notice to owner of violations', abatement by city; collection of costs. ther If the owner of any lot, tract or parcel of can shall ert;fY the owner y~ fail or addrefuseressed to comply with section ce ad hen the city publication as many as two (2) times within ten (10) him at his post office address by not be had or if the owner's address is not known. At consecutive days, if personal service may may enter the expiration of ten (10) days after notiflcation as provided muse h work tohbe done in order upon he premises and may do such work as necessary that the premises may comply with the renulrements of this article. A statement the cost own of uch condition shall be maild to the thereof. Such cost eate of the meaWng the premises, whin incurred by the city to abate Ei thirty (30) days of the statement shall be paid within t the city council and on file in the office shall include re administrative fee as established by file a state secretary, in addition to the actual cost of cutting or removing the vegetation' of the city if the statement has not been paid within the thirty day p®rsod, the city manager ch condition premiseso ment with the county clerk of the expenses incurred to abate su on nhe whi such and the city shall have a privileged lien on any lot, tract or parcel of land upo to tax Liens and liens for street imp ovem expense is incurred, second only due. For tanY such ten (10) percent on the delinquent amount and reco very and f° eclosure had in the name expenditure and interest, , suit it may he instituted thereof shall be prima facie proof of of the city, and the statement uch ndo krperformed by the city. the amount expended in any (Code 1966, § 12.27) Sec, 20.73. Appeals from amount billed for cutting. Within fifteen (16) days of the date a statement ofclo he re~ ablenth of he charges premises as provided in this article, such uwder may sfppea a written statement with the city billed for abating the su htchs ges city council by ng [unreasoi able. Such appeal shall be submitted to the manager stating -1397 BASIC MAINTENANCE IMPACT RECOMMENI FT) PROPOSAL SOUTH PARK 1 r }y"f 1 ) PRRLiMiNARY -.w 1 y+ ;A } rr'r 1 1 tt+~..+r I~ CL A'~'j A - X44 acres f.QNCRPTUAL MASTER PLAN i , r. ~.x,e war 1014 atr ar ri ] CLASS 13 - 34,47 acres rEI' rnnicsnrutnccrtennounrrnrurnrvi f ` BLAIr I' 100' W' 4 t ; `I A r\ qtr : , h>+ fr' CLASS C q 1' 100' W' I - 16,00 aera A 1 A J CLASS D - 149109 acres qli~ ntir, ~ 1~ tft 1 1 i"~ LNa~,dr II yy SEE ATTACriEU MAINTENANCE STANDARD CLA$SIFICATICN n Yti} Sig' Y A4:: t +'lf p QQ S 71~R1! w+l '3 i' 1 rY r i ~ t I} , ~ ~ to 1 = t' It: ~ Cl j ~ r 1 ~ ) ♦ 1 f' ...n r r i+n IJ ty ~ t t crt ~fTN!ri' i.t I T'~"', i}1 ' ~~~r l 1_ rfi~~`', +~t' ~ s rt 1, ItTr t~ t hii - , q r II r , r Y45 r tr Ytyu L It t ,a,E f r d _ r' f4 r ~?f "ht + - i '~I~ , r7't- 11t ~e +t ~a S L id7 1M1 i -~Il I 1 { r y ~ifl~ ST'> ty 1F , ~P {kF 'q ~,'i~ hlk3ti a I , ~ - • _ ~ ~ ~ ~ • 1 r 4 " S ~;,,1,v` + r,~, fit' y;'!;~~,s~ - ' rs Ir Ir i _ ~ n ~ 1~ ;Yi 214 i XY`, , / i r-+!•..-~-- .r 7:....` C ITY _ COUNCI] i rr- ' 1 .L.x',•A" L..- Q.Y.W. FFFF ooooanoa0Q0000O1~~, "gyp ~ a O 0000000cc c a ~ c eon°°~~ '~ti pE~e, pia Ilam ~ wry of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 668.8307 Office o1 the City Manager MEM0nA &Kn JM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FRCM: Betty Williams, Deputy City Secretary DATE: June 19, 1992 SUBJECT: Work Session item #3 The back up for this item is attached to the agenda under separate cover. Betty -tXirlZl Deputy City Secretary ~y tWtbl ~ - . - 'CITY _r .COUNCIL:, - t - T - - ::ooooa~ooonaooooppo OQQO~ y ti _ ~ v r m Q. © IT a - - Do~~pOpO ° L'DCCGL~p~ I 4 klonda No Arl~ixfalforti_.__l~h/~S Nki CJTY of DENTOM, TEXAS 215 E. WKINNEYI DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (617) 566.8200 M_EM 0_14 -A N__U U M DA'I'F,: June 16, 1992 TO: Lloyd Harrell, City )tanager FROM: Gary A. Collins, Director of Information Services SUBJECT: Automated ALLendaint This memorandum is to keep you informed of our progress on implementing the Automated Attendant feature on our phone system, As you know this feature of our new telephone system will allow the various departments to have prerecorded messages regarding commonly asked questions on selected phone numbers and provide the citizens with information about their services on a 24 hour 7 day a week basis, After meeting with all the departments, most of the departments have decided to supplement their existing phone numbers with additional numbers to provide the citizena w.Lh this inforin at1on, The exception to this was the four ar An we are going to implement first. All prerecorded messages will be preceded with instructions on 'iow to use this feature with the most important instruction being that at an yLime the caller can reach a perscn by pressing U and they will be connected to a person in the appropriate department during normal business hours, At this time we are planning to implement this feature on July 1, 1992 f'or' four areas, These areas are the personnel's Job Line, Municipal Court, Library and Parks and Recreation. During the week of June 22 to June 26 the various departments and divisions will be recording their respective messages. On Sunday June 28 and Wednesday July 1, 1992 we will place an advertisement in the Denton Record Chronicle explaining this service for the first four areas. On July 1, 1992 we will activate this service for these four areas, Also during the month of July we will send out bill stuffers explaining this service for these four areas. On Monday August 31 1992 we will be activating this service for the remaining departments and divisions, On Wednesday July 29, and Sunday August 3, 1992 we will be again placing advertisements in the Denton Record Chronicle explaining this service for all the departments and divisions. This 2 phase approach will provide us with time to discover and resolve any quirks or problems before all the departments and divisions are activated, &Jol)(M KIP, Agoncid [tm„__ .~J If you have any questions or I can be of any further service do notes j°? hesitate to give me a call, Gary A~ Collins Director -f Information Services I i A I 4 AO t J /~``VO Sit! ip g Cr st t N U y d a l drr ~ BETTY BETTY L. MCNETT, tee 3 ° Vol, 1161 Vol, 1161 Pq.966 O.R.QC. I o ,Q N 89363! 89'36'31' ri lure A izo,ts- ~ 1 l Ss' EA ro 12, 1 r cn 1~ r (0.4 v aL~ f o i I ct! N 8; I~~ a 1 i L~ ( EL `IA n V I V o LC ti (0.5 -4hi 1: ! ` N8 f i N y 1II r- o ~ J x ~ r g ~a o I 0 (i V t it 66 1 ' o Pip • el. MOM 1 0 10 20 b 40 50 100 GRAPHIC SCALE ILI vyEt ~I•_so' " ' o P61N r- Of 0 DENTON C JEHOVAH" Vol. 654 A0 i ~r i OF 6326 ACRE'S t^Irv nr nCAMIA/ rCaVA C% SHELfT . 7 - -i) I= 1 i 1 DATE REVISIONS By i NT/lp j ~ r ■r I li ss r i r~ i r t a , STATE OF TEXAS XX COUNTY O F, DENTON XX wHRRLII ' , , S,. WE OARY~JANKE, 11trrD,~1IFli HAk~xX t MAk'ItjN R:. wxl$ 41M TM2 OW RPS OF A 1,6326 ACRE 4;TRACT OUT OF THE ROBERT A>aAUJ V REAUMOOT .8tJRV1flf '0S)TRACT .31, CITY OF ,D,~N1"ON .COUNTY, {TR J 04 Y G 71LL 01~.; X,OTS'..,.17 frM t{s T; ""Rt 6CX ON N, AN AD AND'. O~ SIR $ b'~ OWN R A l TO TER'.OY• ! Qi`tiE T`0B, _QXTON COUNTY, F 1tI;Cp1pED ,'11' ~11I#~E?.t11tG8tw2, tAT56P. ODRNTOCTNR PLAT . TR> R;CP! RgCORDSA OUN TRXAB ,p1~b $~21 $EING MOREAUTICrI.1~ItL~f 0910CRIBED AS r BETTY l; WNETT 1 VOL1161 h"G'0R IT AIGHT-OF-WAY . OF, BONN119 ARAB STREET AT 1 : B , EROWNADDlTI0N 'WHICH,,IS .;~E I+ORT1iWEST N CONGREGATIO$1 QF ;JN.QVA ';S WITNESSES KM' RBCORD9 0P DETOU St0LVTY,, 'TEXAS j 1N $9'66$31 E- 132611, 00 SECONDS EAST •WI" THE 0;~l$T,1-9IGDT-OF- tV► 'E' OF 514.50 F83T TO AN 1110*.. PIH AT-THE. iT ACRE- TRACT; DEEbED , BY JACXIN T: BROWN r~ i ►LUN$ 1! 161 s . PAGE-9660 DEED. RECORDS. OF Lo. 1. _ i 1 ' 3.1 SECONDS EAST, WYTH . THE ' SOUTlH LINE OF OF 13 TRACT~'eBEIN0- ON THE W EST ZI P; ' AT THE L 0' 14B'Op.I,OT 91 ` r•0.e*4 Act' OF BELLEMBAD ADDITION AS R$CORDBD 1N r DENTON COUNTY i , -TEXAS ECO' NDS " 60 S' FAST wxTH THE. STl'LIMt OF ' 1#10~8 , OF SAID'. BkO!F N TRACT, A OZ STANCt OF 'NEST LINE OF: tOt. 5 Op EAlb HSW;OXAD 114 28 SBCaNoo WT' 1V2l'A .THS T, LINE 'OF . N ERQWN TRACT A DIlSTAX01 '.Q 5. ` r R..OF LOT. 4.110:0,-, bHI;LkMEAb ADbXT20t# t fA-9~rn~tnc., v~cn+~M~tr ~1~m~~+i~en`t'Y*u~i'eio s ll4 1 , w a eG~ 1 1 1'" / r 5Yi 1 L f ~fT m r OM" ACRE t 1 L1. i f~ . is .i S~d41x~G~0'N', 12A,18' - y 1 124400 . a I APPIROV Q rW qT 36 AD.j 19 GARY JANKE MAR $ARILYN R. JANKE - : DAT9 7. i~ 8Y rw ctr cw xOF WAA is STATE OF TEXAS , XX COUNTY OF DENTON XX cur ~v. N k DEFORE MEN THE-UNDERSIGNED NOTARY PUBLIC 1 ZLIC _*N AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE ~.f?:►" Ei I. Y rARY ON'THIS PAY PERSONALLY APPEARED GARY JANKE JANKE AND MARILkN R. J'ANKE KNOWN TO ME TO BE THH PERSONS WHQSE NAMES ARC SUSSCRIH )BSCRIBED' TO THE FORkGOING INSTAUMZNT; W.. AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME TRA'r xHHY EXECUTHI MUTED THE SAME FOR THL.PURPOSE AWD TO THE CAPACITY THEREIN STATEDi t ..,:....,.;.4T:;. 3 9.0' T ~.1t.U t CONSIDERATIONS THERRIN EXPRgSSED AND IN THE to • tCOW ACRE 1 " Pt+rMNnt ; 'CE THIS DAY OF ".0` . r • r / to Ptpr f. aT ~ a r+t 0 a 10 -1d ~0 100 ~Ide ~t NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF TEXAS GRAPHIC SCALE +~~'lCI 14AB6' IN' 30~ 5 89"28'006'W 161.6 PRIM D NR E OF NOTARY 'I MY COMMISSION EXPIRESs PQINr-of-BEGINNINI DENTON CONGREGATION X f JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, Vol, 6'59 P4.332 DJU I ED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR, DO HEREBY M AN ACTUAL AND ACCURATE SURVEY OF THE rulDDw^lu tarlMl? 'bT l r%on ttur%WD VV '.ftrD40A1/lt- Mt- • i &Am~mmmmmmml& -'Y. / 1 DW?j c% I a r i SAY AEV0ION9 CKD ; BY t _ j y~ i e ~ l a t ~r T T - • w I _I i Lii r s Li 2 A - rk=F _L l ti 7 :CITE COUNCIL I I _ {tI f _ t #:ooo~o~adoaaaab~201 6o c 4. 0 -1-~OOOtiTO H ~ E*~G : - °0~~ccncct}4o~I r r r + 1 t ♦t ~.~i~~ ``I liI i-♦ l111 ~ IL !.r t ` NI inapprtriatinnuf GRe~~~ TILtJW S. ULA" WHEREAS, Tillman E. Uland is retiring after, 37 years of dedicated service to the City of Denton since his employme June 1, 19551 and Uland has WHEREAS, during his career with the (.'tYr Tillman cooperation with consistently maintained astated u goals c of the Police and dedication to thantont and Department of the City of De WHEREAS during his tenure with the City, Tillman E• Uland has always placed the utmost importance on the welfare Of the citizens of Dentont and WHEREAS, Tillman E. Wand has always responded to his duties in, a loyal, trustworthy and extremely faithful manner, in,; a spirit of cooperation with his fellow employees and, the communityt NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT REB0:.7ED BY THU COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP DENTON1 That the sincere and warm appreciation of the City uponithe permanent formally spreading dthis Uland optimal l minutes of the City Council and forwarding to official manner her a true copy hereof. ~,,``day of , 1992. PASSED AND APPROVED this the ~1Sa A 1 A. K ~i1 BOB CABTLEBERRY, MAYO ATTESTt JENNIFER WALTER9,'CITY SECRETARY By t 4:zae APPROVED AS 'TO LEGAL FO1'Y(ATTORNBY DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, Byl -CITY CpUNCIL T. T .ooQ~oaoanooo~baoo~o : . CS J i s rLt y~t:i }k{~ y Ai~entlu lltrm__..~~ -..s? 4 V~f~..,C /ilf Summary Of Citizen's Report to Denton City Council on Problems with the Sexually Oriented Business Ordinance Since It is likely that Wrangler's may be forced out of business in Lewisville and Denton's S.O.B. ordinance is the easiest to comply with for an Adult Only shop and has, perhaps by accident, made it difficult for a general interest video store to carry a minimal amount, of sexually oriented material-- It may be time to repair the current ordinance, f After a full year of hearings and the unanimous approval of P&Z, a draft went to the Council that should have permitted up to 30% adult material without zoning problems, A last minute change by the legal ntaff cast doubt on which videos would be counted. If the ordinance read (under "Adult Bookstore or Adult j Video Store Means;")--EXCEPT THOSE FILMS AND MOTION PICTURES WflICH HAVE RECEIVED RATINGS BY THE MOTION PICTURE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA OF G, PG, PG-130OR R OR WERE PRODUCED BEFORE 1980-- there would be no doubt, about most of the videos that a building inspector could count. As it is, an Inspector could count PO-13 films while another inspector might not count some NC-17 films. The present: definition might suit; a lawyer-but-it-Is-of-no «aid -to a store owner or an inspector, There can be a good rase made not to Include-the portion- of the ordinance ab.,ut unlawful display to minors In a zoning law, but rules need to be somewhere in the body of Denton law, State law setts a broad outline but leaves tho final responsibility to local communities. The only convictions I am aware of in the city have been over display to minors, Hearings were held in P&Z on the subject but the provision (which is still in the heading of l the current: ordinance) was left out of the final draft. I favor the age of 18 since the state Ill uses a face-forward photo for persons over that ago and Is a quick check of age without: math and birthdates with I;he use of the state allowed ago of 17, Also a problem that might not fit In a zoning-regulation-- is the problem of material carried by cable, The omnibus crime bill passed in '80, insured local government control of "unprotected speech" on subscription television, While local cable has not run anything that has baon illegal for adults to see, there 4s a real problem for the same material being available to minors, The display to minors provisions of Texas law are considerably different from what is permitted for adults, Joe Dodd 1107 Greenlee t'iC; Ail, Denton Zoning Regulat iOD Adult Video Store means: (a) Acornmerclai establishment wtlich has as or1e of itu principal business purposeu offers for sale or rental for any form of consideration any one or more of the following: (1) photographs, films, Motion piCtUT08, video casettes or video reproductions, slides, or other, visual representations DISTINGUISHED OR Thin Is NOT criminal CHARACTERIZED BY A N law but these are criminal ` law definitions which no EMPHA I an matter efepictinl;, describing or relating to "specified t3t,ild:ng ng OPtafuitcSlyelia s can e, sexual activities" or "specified nor can a stently enf parson anatomical areas"; reasonably amply with. (13) Far the purpose of this definition, a commercial extablisthwent shall be considered to have as "one of itq principal business purposes" the sale or rental of materials described above, if- ( 1) Tito establishment makes rise of a sign viuible from any public street, whether located on or off t:he property of the establishment, advertising the availability at the extablishmont of any material described in (A); or (7) The ext.ablishwerit devotes more than 30 Z of its total 1-100r area which is opert to the public to the display of items for uale or rental that are described i.rl (A); (3) More Man ;$0% of the total number of itoms displayed for sale or rental by the establishment are rnaterials described in (A); or, (r) The establishment rogularly rnaintains orl the property for sale or rerlLal inat:eri.als described in (A) whose total ref:ail va:ue is more than 50-% of the Lotal retail value of all rnaterialu kept on the premises for title or rental. -3 r Aocnda low., DENT'ON ZONE CONTINUED-- Date _----~r •2' :~c2 Specified Anatomical Areas means human genitals in a state of sexual arrousal. Specified Sexual Activities means and includes A N Y of the following: There are hundredo (A) the fondling or other erotic touching (thousands'?) of rG-13 of the human genitals, pubic region, buttocks, Films which could anus, or fomale bfeasts; fell under thief and (l3) sex acts, normal ror p~ fA„iE-l,orv~orted, and there are NO-17 t,CTUAL OR SIMl1nr l), Films which SOME. including intercourse, oral copulation, Building Officials or sodomy; might not count. (c) mastarhation, ACTUAL OR SIMULATED; or (D) oxcrotery functions as part. of or in connection with any of the activities set forth in (A) throligh (C) abov*. r~ State penal Code 43,21 ;',,~a1r A armful or Display of Harmful Material to Minor (a.) For- Purposes of I;hi►3 ~;ection: (1) -Minor'" means an ind.1vidual. younger- that[ t'/ years. (1) "1larrnl'ut raateri.al- rrlearis material whose domiriarlt therrie taken as a whole: (h) appeals; to the purient interest of a minor-, in sex, nudity, or excretion; ity (B) is patant,l.y offe.USive to prevaiting Ncan beodeterminodabynrde scan<1mrds in ttie adait community as a al court oases whole with respect: to what. is suitabl.e local the local for- minors; and rtheo has (C) ifc rlttfir]y Without rodeerrling, social deoi sed to go to VHhle for minors. ever the (b) A person comrriits an offorlse it, trial unscrambled running of knowing that ttvz material is tlarrrli'u1: (1.) and knowing the Per-t3on IS a rp'irl.or, an NC-17 Film on cable) or the city can set Ito cells, distributes, exhibits, of I)089068e1s for sale, distrit)llt.ion, or exhibitiorl to H genaral guided BEFOHE ,ninor- hartnfill material; the praatioe beaumes he djsplays3 harmful triaterial and is even the more troublesome. reckloss about. whether a rrlinor- is grQSent Wbo will be offonded or alarrried by the dtyf>lay; or __svf;'r1oN ON 1s1afF`tOYINO hMtl' .._SECTION ON DRFUNSES W1{1C1i INCLUDES! (?l) the sale, distribution, or- exhibition wail tA) a minor- wllo wasa oior' o k,%, rse. :ortsent.ing parent, 6uardiu Federal Criminal C 'ode <P,4'_s t"ec. 7 ~?.a, ( able% Television Obscenity (a) Now Offense- Chapt€i, 71 title 18 United 'Matey C odo is amme;nded by inserting at the ond, the following nE;w section: 1468. Distributing obscene material by cable or 9Ub8criptiOn. teleVitrion (a)WhoHVer knowing utters any obsc:erto language or distributes any obscene matter " by means of cable television or subscription Services on tolevision, stall bar punished by imprisonment for not more than 1 years or a fine to accordance wit.b t.hia title, or both. (b) As used in t:hirs section, the town "dirst:ributo' means to send, transmit, retransmit, telecast., broadcsisiL, or cablecasL, including; by wirc., microwave, or satellite, or to produce or provide material for such distribution. (c) Nothirst its. this chapter, or the (:abte (:ornrnunicRMorts policy Act; of 1964, or any other provNiurt of Foderal lwiw is intended to interfere with or preempt the power of the lt:atoq, including political subdivisions thereof, to regulate the tattering of language ,,,W that is obscene or otherwise tinptotected by the CouRt:iLution or the distribution of mutter, gthat is obscene or otherwise ttnprotect:od Note: unprotected speech inaludee by the Constitution, of arty sort, by means thane materisis of cable televison. or subscription sarvi.ces on "harmful to television. minors" --Passed in 1988•--- - 9a ATTACHMENT 3 Pgonda No AgO3da linm_.!QS - NO, NORTH P 92-017 Alex Robertson Replat J eo1~ it 2 LOT I I a I 5040 90. FT. - urvr;~a~ .i den Ittior N W DOW OF ECSlnN6 (609 5 rREEr MILL FINAL REPLAT ristes 51291 Scales NONE ` (y 1y Y ; / AFA NEWS Published b The American Family Association of De"(utl C011111y may, 9% ll1nnda No P U 110s 2641, Ihnton'Texas 76202 (817) 899 AM jtOVCO,j1rj, Q& STORES FN- 1A, f hl101'rj+1edk„11,1 . I.ticlitvay Maul V1DEO S'i'(JItF Na "S1i+Ms 106 W. I Iickoty 1Afail(Milr) D(tilloll "I'X 76201 pllyless Video slot es }fi(HI Wilson .187.5499 (3 Iocotions) I)clllon,'l X 76201 Mrlfll Office: 1,97-4592 N.'1'exas Book & Supply I IUO Dallas Uiive 1013 Ave. C Benton, TX '16205 O lick Stop Uenlon, I'X 76201 565.1212 900 Ave, C. Urnton, T' 76201 13, Imi(on Ilookse11e1s 7Go 183.3012 CIolden'I'risngle Milli 71"1 1-35E' 22(1) i-35E3 71 n, 1'X 7(12{}5 C'ileo Ocrltorl, TX '161.1}5 8566.3663 1-11(11''x, tlnivrssity 5{,(,1C,8 66.3 Uerllon,'I'X "16201 ro Stnr e Ld-:rez i1.N; I'. i3auk State l'1'( ' 'ensl(fy l.n., # IN 11'nlden I)ooks Student Union Building Ma111 1)eu(1n "X 7!1205 ti(11(Icn'I'ritiul;lc T)enlnn,'I'X 21.01 1.351?, 11420 565-2026 3112-A292 Denton,'1'X 76205 Downlown Video :182.4855 K•Mnrt' NJ r. Joe Dodd 23M W. thilvelsily 114 N. 1A)CU51 (110 1110 Slillilre) Convenir.nce. Stores" Denlon, TX '16201 I)cntou,'I'X 76201 1601 F. McKinney 383.2602 387.7482 De'll1on,'E'exns 76201 565.1314 1Im logs Hook Store Cox',idco 2.105 Colorado Blvd. 912 W, University Shute Stltiiil I)rive•h1 Uenton,1A 76205 Ue.nttln, TX 76201 1918 n, 1Vorth Drive 565.1764 wi-54(m l)irrllon, TX '16201 382.8211 ' X.Afari It nK'nn of Malden nooks " P.1 's collvenlrnre Mores, /me, hos three su,res in IA"nfan, (1V1lf,vj.jheta ley pium the store of Krill F. AlrA'inrie)'sfi11 has flit logo 'f l,'s ' un lf, her has horn said, Ihtltn'.ur1'rietd-are.lcfllale pum 11 is easy Io find nn attclnnlive to the porn dcalcn. 'Clean' cv+nvenicncc slare< inchldc, 7•11.2,Icvco, l .J,'s, Rick's brlve•ln nod DO t t:+fl. A'clcnn' brink sUlrr" Lc VIMfl+nan's, Inuead oMMa(I try WaIl11a11 (it Target, and for videos use llluckhu.mers Video, or 1~n~gcrs,, 'I tie Impnl lnnl Ih1ng Is Ihn1 It+cre are allerunlivcx out there pad we shuuld.tic_Supp9clLul hu5111455SS 191111.layl; nladc..IImAccislon tV.bc 14(x+d c(tllelvi In Imilon and tint Se11 poll It may utcnn dfivinga fewex(fa blocks, but it Is a small prlee In 11ny it) keel+I )vi mu n prat p1me in 11vc. n1 1K1 l Ill-11 (11 I Ills Nroff I:t1 I. (Im In S( OR I1111.NUS, SUN(1AYSCII001,C'IAS>a, (11AVOP10 Pq r 71-7 CITY COUNCIL` . _ L "xQJ _ ooooanannnoo ~0doo O~~~O~ { y ~0 i a o d - LQOOO~ P o V t ~ ioOC~~ " _ _ ~400C~ur r ft f 4 -4,1 DATE: 06/23/92 CITY COUNCIL REPORT Aahnd3 Mu. - d /8 AUvda ltnmk5 - 4/ TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council fl:lu_._. G~-92 FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager / 6 ° SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY AND FINAL REPLATS OF PORTIONS OF LOTS 7 AND 8, BLOCK 71 INTO LOT 11, BLOCK 71 OF THE ALEX ROBERTSON ADDITION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval 5-0. gUMMARY• The 5,040 square foot lot is located on the north side of Mill Street between Cook Avenue and Allen Street, No final plat exists which defines the current configuration of the lot, but the lot has been transferred by deed ("metes and bounds1t) as early as 1954. Since the lot existed in its current configuration prior to the adoption of the zoning ordinance, there is no violation of the area requirements, according to Section 35-91 (b) of the zoning ordinance. Currently, the lot is vacant and is proposed as the site of a single-family residence, This is compatible with the character of the existing neighborhood. Since sidewalks were not required by the original plat, and all other required public improvements are in place, there will be no new public improvements with this replat. $ACKGRQUND: The proposed lot is currently zoned multi-family (MF-1), which allows the single-family detached use. No change in zoning is proposed. City services and facilities, including water, sanitary sewer, electrical, and solid waste, are available. The replats conform to the minimum requirements of the subdivision and Land Development Regulationsi Chapter 34 of the code of Ordinances, PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: None Mayor and City Council AUenda Il/rm_24-15-- 3une 23, 1992 N16 Z- Page 2 a All FISCAL IMPACT: o An addition to the tax base and housing stock of the City of Denton. ~tespectf y/s/ubmitted: v prepared by: Lloyd Harrell A, City Manager G. Owen Yost, Urban Planner Approved: Frank H. Robbins AICP Executive Director Planning and Development AXX00185 ATTACHMENT 1 klri;W!i !n P 92.017 Alex Robertson Replat 2,V~ NORTH L ~ ~ I~ 4 }dRl( i ~ I _ 1 W 1 F`- w C 4`45 { l___ LE.RILN zI Sii eI`1l z.~~i` I „'3Rd'R.f. rry•cRV I~.~I~..----I y'.-~, , ~ ~Kf 1 r7 ❑ e ❑ C - F--, Lam - u HAY L f --`-1r~~V1 Q~ `If 01K '1K (lI~ I ai~'(n,RY ~ 3' ~ I' ~J KSCJ L ~IC wICIKORY I(''~'}41 f F4 -AL I 1-tlCBERNV ~ 11 ~J I] ~tl r7 JENY"NAYS SVCAW~Pf „ VUL• .,Wf' K w 1 FEAT < Y ~4 3U0 = CEKIEAY cc E. PRdIR `r r PA 11A~ LO,O,f• ~1 K w t O a r i ~ LA W 1 ~I r 1 f 1 I / J DREG MOOAE yvE W * n j =1 A~ V Y ~ ~J( RUY4 a K OOnK ^^.LL NS I 0AROt1L9 u4 ,w iN 0 r IKUC++ERrr iSTA SHADY o~ aLECRE v rv OAKS OP L LINOSEY u SANTA F1 "WAq g l' LdpE j ""F~s a~VI Cr. Dow 5/29/92 Scales NONE , ATTACHMENT 2 Agonda PJrJ. , ~a AHendaltums_~.L~._ P 92-417 Alex Robertson Replat 1z,~ Z- NORTH ip 4id f 8 3 ' d r~r~~rsa+oo - MW 0EXt Oftf .Q _ .eau _ '°td $ ~ «xxWCC,yy v I y 14,11 r na nm^ - _ • N • ~OiNT oK eC3.~n~NO T 4 _ MILL (Fey C! O/ nu .wM1 srmerr I60; 1 PRELIMINARY REPLAT Data 5/29/92 Scala NONE Nynda No. Agen lei 1 [1Nn ` Minutes PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 10, 1992 The regular meeting of the Planing and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas, was held on Wednesday, June 10, 1992, at 5;00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall. Present: Jim Engelbrecht, Ivan Glasscock, Mary Evelyn Huey, William Kamman, and Fran Morgan Absent: Judd Holt and Marvin Willis Present from Staff, Frank Robbins, Fxecutive Director for Planning and Development; Owen Yost, Urban Planner; Harry Persaud, Senior Planner; David Salmons, Engineering; Gerald Cosgrove, Water/Wastewater; Cecile Carson, Administrative Analyst; and Donna Baker, Planning Technician Vice-chairman Kamman called the meeting to order. 1. Minutes It was moved by Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht, and unanimously carried (5-0) to approve the minutes of the May 13, 1992, regular meeting. II. Consent Agenda Motion was made by Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht, and unanimously carried (5.0) 'o approve the consent agenda as follows: The General Development flan 24.6259 acres located at University Drive and 1-35, b, the preliminary repiat of Lot 1, Block 1, of the Alvin and Charlotte Whaley Addition, plus approximately .588 acres cf unplatted land. C. The preliminary and final replats of portions of Lots 7 and 8, Block 1, Alex Robertson Addition. 111. Consideration of acquisition of 1.825 acres at the Spencer Road Power Plant was withdrawn from the agenda. 1V. Work Session. a. Sign Ordinance - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ICITY E + -COUNCIL - - - - -t - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ooagaaaaaa~o - nF o(~ --QO 0F p ~ o D ► b~ ~a CE: b ~ p -QUO~.yr ~~f`V °ococa~aap°c t2t I DATE: 06/23/92 q CITY COUNCIL REPORT, kunrla P.denda k!ana._-_tQ[.y B'•. TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council INtu ' Tdy?~ FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager ~ REPLAT LOTS 1, 2f BEING REPLATS OF SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY MIADDITION, FINAL DALEBROWN OF THE & ~ ADDITION, LOTS 1-7, BLOCK 1 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and zoning Commission recommend approval (4- 0). SU RY The 1.6326 Brae, a approximately 800 located fet o south of University Drive. The only public improvements to this site are two (2) fire hydrants. The hydrants will be installed by the City Utility Department and paid for by the developer. BACKGROUND: The zoning on this tract is Planned Development No. 144 (PD-144). A detailed plan for three medical office buildings was approved. Prior to the PD zoning, the property was zoned and platted for seven (7) Single-family 10 lots. City servicos and facilities, including water, gao, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and solid waste, are available. The replat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulationsi Chapter 34 of the Cole of Ordinances. PROGR&M EPA TMEN3'S OR GROUPS AFFECTED- Building Inspections and Planning Department A09.g0 No. _Yo ~U~!'~ Mayor and City Council Aganda ltem_ZS__ !ice June 230 1992 Page 2 a~ FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Respect lly submitted: Prepared by: Lloyd V Harrell city manager a,,tv Kar n4 K. F Shari Urban Planner Approved; / Frank H. Robbins~AICP Executive Director Planning and Development AXX00186 ` AEendi No. Q1lL_____-- Agenda P 92-019 Janke Addition Replat NORTH ,dc a r' + j DEL'aAVER _JL_11 a t ii C N Z I 4U'~CE'AfPO / VIII m o ~ LU u% );F-7 t'S ICHIASRIC A.MHERS' r ITA 3 HYrY, 380 UNIVERSITY OF ,Y ST fflaT HEx10H , -1~xESTC~!ESSER ELEME! 4 as rA I- I III ~o- Imoa u lI ~ c°ROg`L~----~ EHr~ [ESE r w m - --°---I E-1 CA7L0-4 ! LINDEN F r ~ N Y a SITE a ~ a w ~SENADU 1" I MCPAFKNA g U CON- rL Do [i ~-----HOUSTON -PL-~ O a O DENrONKNIT ALAHDa'~ 11jfALC IF W. OAK ~'N, OAK _ ' C~IU W y~ W, H1CKOr2Y a ` !L` JI I o --yrN~eERRY F- FF7-7-7 7~/11[tL'IT Date: 5/20/92 Scale; NONE? ~j Aganrla No. -It) ~c~enda Ilem_.~~ '..y'---~--- ca,~o NORTH P 92-019 Janke Addition Replat~ l 1 if - 40 o) I m e \ I 9 jry I ~I <r~ CI Arco / 0 dam, L0 SF.y Z i 2 eY~ ~ I f M N ~tW m a II RI oo a ti~ OLOC, ' I P rz ~5,w Aim 3 11 !f' rr we : S 'w w U buWrrx rrnawr w A iMr rrr n ti ~t H Lor,J f ~ y fwir .rRr 11 ,{taj~~,rq~~,j~ ,W I . ~ ` ~ !auk[ d,trtM~r ifJlr S, "W 0. 0 F& a., 11 G.,t S Il f I8 P~1r 0~'Bf GM,NNB 111IIIIItI V 1(4 aster <aaarrm. a I' I f 0 } 0 5~ .y t0 ~ PRELIMINARY REPLAT hate, 5/20/92 Scale: NONE L~ ~Rr w Agivid3 hlo. NORTH P 92.019 Janke Addition Replat I } . ,w IO I~IY oLeC I Ito} M. at + i o ~y ! M B9'!6'D' f Il7J7' I r~-- - yS A 1(/ 1T T3+S I I 1 I I r I •Jl IWIe I a~ co, I • ` ; I a ,y w Ur i tS + z'.P! e ~ U Za ~ ~ ry~ ~ I .c• z "s I ~ G Vf4 f~ ~ ~ CL~~woo►...,.ura n P O ~ y I m .s,r ~ ulrwvrt irco J' yg r y. R f f' N ILOY 1 N K Ur G ? C I ~~r S ~ y e~ 1 r ! g 0. R u, I ' ~ ILOre ZG N ~ g ~ ICa~iwrl I a ~63 '1 u k f3i+.t/.. I I n, b ~E ion , A I r LL,. e t w NM'MOV[ iWr 4 `tPi 5 r s• k, rr s>4', I r 1 • LPI 8 sf y~Q • I M1 .1-P wr .3 - 4 f&l bp/ MGM + I ra' C• 1 I MM l07 W Y, 1 I ~I S 19.11W w IV or LOY e W/dL m A J~Mt Khr"r cw Afl a 111 SOUM IpVCtY [(A,{!!~~ le-N M' 1 • i r.(t"I, MI OM^.C P4r, ICX~t7 70W7 y ul mot L f FINAL REI'LAT Ditto. 5/20/92 Scale: NONE A{~or;(Ia No. P&7 Minutes DRAFT Of May 27, 1992 Page 9 be 57 trees instead of the required 45. There is a small drive from the site to University that magnifies the size of the street yard. Staff recommends approval of the alternative landscape plan. Ms. Huey asked about the dotted line on the drawing. Mr. Yost said it is an easement. ' Mr. Engelbrecht moved to approve the alternative landscape plan for Cracker Barrel Restaurant. Motion was seconded by Mr. Glasscock and carried unanimously (4.0). Vt. Hold a public hearing and consider the preliminary and final replats of Lots 1, 2, & 3, Block 1 Janke Addition, being a replat of Lots 1.7, Block 1 Dale Brown Addition. Staff Report; Mr. Yost reported that the tract is 1.6326 acres located on the east side of Bonnie Brae, approximately 800 feet south of University Drive. The only public improvements tc this site are two fire hydrants. The hydrants will be installed by the City Utility Department and paid for by the developer/ The zoning on this tract is Planned Development 144. A detailed plan for three medical office buildings has been zpproved. Prior to the PD zoning, the property was zoned and platted for seven SF-"O lots. No one wos present to speak in favor or in opposition to the replat. Recommendation: Mr. Yost stated that the Development Review Committee recommends approval of the replat pending submittal and approval of drainage plans. It was moved by Mr. Engelbrecht, seconded by Ms. Huey, and unanimous?y carried (4-0) to recommend approval of the preliminary and final replats of the Janke Addition conditioned upon approval of drainage plans. VII. Hold a public hearing and consider amending the sign ordinance. Mr. Kamman stated that the Commission will listen to the speakers at the public hearing and sort out the issues, They will not be taking any further action this evening. Rob Rayner, 700 Dallas Drive, read the definition of a stake sign to the Commission. Ile asked them to consider changing the allowable size of a stake sign from a 2" X r " IV, -.CITY . ` ~COI7NCIL r. 1- - - - T"INT: -.-__:TT777 - TT I-TT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - t - _ ooooonoaoaaoooo~oo T T. ~O 4 aAO~ 1~ a O d O _ D~~O~yrb N t E+O~~Q.. ooco, Uc f T. J. if j=# w J DATE: 06/23/92 CITY COUNCIL REPORT nopwh 416, . 9 •O~~ ' Agendl Itam_ Cr- TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council [bto ~P'~~~ FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PEPROPOSED RSONAL CARE D PERMIT 0 (KERN CENTER) ENLARGING THE AREA TO 4,857 ACRES RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and zoning Commission recommended approval, 5-•0, at its May 13, 3.992 meeting. SUMMARY' The current permit is for 4.82 acres. In the plat process, it was discovered that the site plan covers a slightly larger area. This amendment would conform the permit with the proposed plat. BAC GROl1ND: An additional .037 acre (approximately 1611 square feet) was needed by the applicant for additional landscaping on the northern edge of the site. PROGRAMS. DEP RTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: None LISS'AL IMPACT: Slight addition to the tax base of the City of Denton. Respectfully submitted: oyd V. Harrel prepared by. City Manager G. Owen Yoer4yLA Urban Planner Apprpved: Frank H. Ro bins AICP Executive D rector Planning and Development AXX0018C Agonda tdo.._lu~.-"Q Artori0 Win 12'L ° - STAFF REPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council To: Z-92-013 Meeting Dates 06/23/92 Case Noss GENERAL INFORMATION Applicants John D. Zimmerman 107 Division xcourt 76012 Arlington, Current owners Peter Kern 2500 Hinkle Drive #308 Denton, TX 76201 Requested Actions Amendment to specific Use Permit No. 200, approved for the Kern Personal Care facility, Location and Sizes side of Hire•.leo directlydnolocated on rth of the Denton Center Shopping facility on university HISTORY On January 21, 1992, the City Council approved the rezoning of a 19,8 acre tract of land as well as approval of a Specific Use Permit for a portion of this tract, The Specific Use Permit. was approvedaf r a 4.it was disc t of land; however, during the platting of thi site, overed that roved S.U.P. differed slightly from the metes and bounds for the app lat This amendment is for he for e the metes and bounds the Sr.U.Pi.nainto conformity with the propo purpose of bringing plat. The additional a11611 dditional landscaping incorporated into the design to accommodate RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning commission recomm.. d approval of Z-92-013 at its 05/13/92 meeting. Case No. 2-92-013 h{ic (gill//an--!g9t•~S-(~~f~i1 G P310 ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition 2. Approve petition with additional conditions 3. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Approved SUP Site Plan 3. Corrected legal description 4. P&Z Minutes ~lAYtsd AXX00163 Page 2 e r updccs%5924 p ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 92-012 TO CORRECT THE ACREAGE COVERED BY SPECIFIC PERMIT NO, 200; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on January 21, 1992, the City Council approved a spe- cific use permit for a personal health care facility located on the east side of Hinkle Drive; and WHEREAS, the acreage covered by the permit, ncorrectly de- scribed in Exhibit A to Ordinance No, 92-012 as 4.82 acres, should have been 4.857 acres; NOW, THEREFORE, t THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTIQN I. That Ordinance No, 92-012 is amended by replacing Exhibit A of Ordinance No, 92-012 with the new Exhibit A, attached to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference. SECTION II. That a copy of this ordinance shall be attached to Ordinance No, 92-01.2, showing the amendment herein approved, SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective imme- diately upon its passage and approval, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992, BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY., APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. D:',AYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: _L _ A(Jer)(Ia 110m__!~S1 EXHIBIT "A" WHEREASa PETER KERN, is the sole owner of a certain parcel or tract of land situated in the R. Beaumont Survey, Abstract Number 315 Denton, Denton County, Texas, and being part of the tract conveyed to Crawford Building Corporation from Sidney Brandenberger in a deed dated June 13, 1955, and recorded in Volume 411, Page 491, of the Denton County, Deed of Records and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: Beginning at a found 1/2" iron rod at the Northwest corner of Denton Center Phase II as recorded in plat reference Volume A, Page 129, Denton County, Deed Records; THENCE N 01018'10"E, along the Easterly Right-of-Way of r Hinkle Drive, a distance of 458.00 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod fo- a corner) THENCE S 88045'53" E, a distance of 462.00 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod for a corner; THENCE S 01018'10" W, being parallel to said Hinkle Drive, a distance of 458.00 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod for a cornor, said iron rod being on the Northerly boundary line of said Denton Center Phase II; THENCE N 88045'53" W, along said Northerly boundary line of Denton Center Phase II, a distance of 462.00 feet to the } Point of Beginning and Containing 211,596 square feet or 4.857 acres of land, more or less. xr JOHN ZI ME MAP Ta d-/q/ 2490 9 a i I)aIa ~iz "~.~1 Z ~ , l NORT ; fr. Z-92.013 Kern Specific Use Permit a Jill. \ A NYi K ~ £7£AS I~ BARK `C vY Ev u ,r ~t I ALIIR J OMPOAN ids 110 . A" I Est: V 11 p 1 ` ~ Y i ?f ~P SITE J saR a t JOJ Q C, If C ENI _ l 6orLIkO N~ l ~ v k E ai I',~ KE ill ` J VA» ILt g W f ~ I ~ t ~ I i ( RAtA V ~ ~ kt }S L ~A N ~ I ~ fA1N u~i , II~ BEL~YEN 41A j CT w R E AIR TUi ANEW tuLAhf,_~~ MIRGROtIOS AC ti ~i M Ot IV AwMERSt tN. ~ Y~~ 'G nn 1 LJ❑ fE)r i' Is~,rli.5"-~! t~ER' ~l ~ tAli@t~ ~ + ~ ~'~i a/✓/`_-__.-.._.._~ r10k RArlU 111 ~ t~ .7 4+ E l~ ` i,' 1'1 Date: 517192 Scale: NONE: - . -WWI Aoonda PJn..__l Acronda ltnrn._,S e._.. I i I 1 q1 ~ ,u Nrt ' ~ \I,V ~ iyN111H r ~~r'1 1 1..a . { 12 ; - ~ ~ '1 'I 1 ' I.~jL. 4 ii' 1 i It l1/ / y r 01- ~IM X111. r -•~y.n..- -f.~~__ C! a. ,YMII Y r, I OM'.[ 1 1 .SS J, A I ; ~ ~ ~ , ,y, WW- AgendaIllom-_/~s- 0110 ~r - °_z-- P&7 Minutes g May 13, 1992 Page 7 Oakridge Apartments Addition. V. Hold a public hearing to consider an amendment to a Specific Use Permit (SUP) for the Kern Personal Care Center, revising the metes and bounds and the size of the site. 18 notices were mailed to property owners within 200'; one was returned in favor and one was undecided, Staff Report: Mr. Yost reported that this amendment is a bookkeeping operation. About two months ago an SUP was approved for a nursing care facility on 4.82 acres. During the platting process, it was discovered that the property is actually 4.857 acres. This amendment is merely to correct the acreage. No one was present to speak in favor or in opposition to the amendment. Recommendation; Mr. Yost stated that staff recommends approval of the amendment. Chairman Holt clo3ed the public hearing. Motion was made by Mr. Engelbrecht and seconded by Mr. Glasscock to recommend approval of the amendment to the S' 1P for the Kern Personal Care Center. Ms. Huey asked if the size of the building or lot was being affected. Mr. Yost said just the size of the lot. Mr. Robbins clarified that the lot isn't changing. It is the SUP boundaries that do not match the lot dimensions. Mr. Engelbrecht asked if the person who was undecided has been contacted by staff. Mr, Yost said not yet but an attempt will be m~idc prior to Council consideration. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). VI, Hold a public hearing and consider the rezoning of a .258 acre tract of land from the Commercial District to the Two-family District on property located at 1320 Myrtle. .qpp,.- -CITY t - COUNCILI °oooooc~a0 P 000000 a a 1 d O , to tR? r L dip- __6-23:72 G/-" DATE: 06/2372 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members uF the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PREL114INARY REPLAT OF LOT 11 BLOCK 1 OF THE ALVIN & CHARLOTTE WHALEY ADDITION, PLUS APPROXIMATELY .588 ACRES OF UNPLATTED LAND; INTO TATS 1R AND 2R, BLOCK 1. RECOMMENllATION: The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval 5-0. SUMMARY: The 4,276 acre tract is behind the existing structure, at the northeast corner of the I-35 frontage road and University Drive. There will be two curb openings accessing the frontage road, plus one at the southeast corner of Lot 2R, accessing University Drive. Lot 1R is currently a gasoline station and convenience store, and Lot 2R is proposed for a Cracker Barrel restaurant. The restaurant, with an attached gift shop, will encompass 9700 sq. ft., with 176 seats. Approximately 150 people will be employed. Approximately 500 feet of sidewalk is proposed, in addition to two fire hydrants to be installed, plus one to be relocated. A section of storm sewer will also be required. BACKGROUND: The current zoning is partially general retail (GR) with a section ui commercial zoning on the south. No change in zoning is proposed. City services and facilities, including water, sanitary sewer, electrical and solid waste are available. The replat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations; Chapter 34 of the Cade of ordinances. ~]USia3 NO Mayor and City Council June 23i 1992 Page 2 C yJTF- GROD DEPARTMEt3T OR ROGRAI'IS N/A the City of Denton• of gT,SCAL I the tax ba3e An addition to mi d, ly Respect z Harrell VVI Lloyd prepared City Manager ' ,bY'A G. Owen Yos urban planner Approved! Ito bins AICP~ rank Director Executiv d Development planning an AXX00184 44 ~~i- ~ ~ ! i i i • KMON ~ 11~~~ ' ~ ~ R«Y 0 . i State of Texass County of Denton: • I ~U111 ~ MMi 1 tell `Ipp~l { u r roullr Uw 1+ 1L I r I r 11 I 'R~ .k 11 ~I YII W ti 1 We, John Lee Woods And wife, Debra Joyce Woods, hereby accept this Plat as a ! i~ ~'Inlr.ny r in q true and correct plat of a Replat of Part of Lot 7 ■nd 8, Block 7, of Alex IY Robertson Addition, Recorded in Volume 1, Page 19 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, being more pArticulArly described as follows: Inllln _ 'Alin 1 ryr. pmaY.rpji1 l~. 9 j M rYYIY y,l r , . I Willi NIIII I ~ , r I Ste` a ► q w a .r Stole 1 : 30 ' BCGIIIHING At an 1/1 inch iron rod met for the corner comm+ou to said LOO 1 and Lot i I of sAid Block I in the North RIGHT O► WAY (R.O.W.) of Hill Street (60 font tr ► ^r THENCE North 88 degrees West with the said North A.O.W. line of Hill Street a till ' I, Irr HU~I distr,uce of 48.0 feet to an 112 Inch iron rod met for corner; I SCd] ,IA , Illly 1•tl At all THENCE North 01 degrees 30 minutes Fast departing said North R.O.W. line a distance of 105,0 feet to A 1/2 inch iron rod met for corner In the line common .r to maid Lot 8 and Lot 9 of sAid !flock 7; I ' q THENCE South 88 degrees F,apt with line common to sold Lat 8 And mniel Lot 9 a ,1` ~II~ I•r" t distance of 48:0 feet to A fence peat found for corner in the west line of Lat ~ 114YYY11M * ~ ~ r 1 3 of said Block 7; r«r TIIENCE South 01 degrees 30 minutes Nest with the line commo11 to the FAat line of u,,. I r'A .~I I I. 10 I1 ~ rll,`~ AAid Lot 7 and A and the, real t'ne of said Lot 3, LoL 2 and Lor I, a distance of 4 105.0 feet to the POINT OF >aF.G1NNING and contnining 5040 mquare feet of lAtid, • T11IS DAY OF 19 ~ r 9 rr1•L~ John Lee Woods Debra Joyce Woods Z0NIN4-1 v 3 _ M~F • I v BEFORE M10 THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, a Notary Public in and for maid County and SET 1/2' IRON Roo State, on this day personally appeared Known to me to 940__ _ 5 880E 4B.d FOUND FENCE POST be the person whosi name is subscribed in the- foregoing instrument, end •lci . -o4G+ _ _ 1420 acknowledged to me that he executed same for the puposss and consideration herein ~.:.r.' expressed and in the capacity therein stated, ;4• W 8 b BLK• 'X.Q►~I I N1t~ BLK. 8 GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND ORAL OF OFFICR, THII Tilt DAY OF mr-1 8 w 2 >n Notary Public in and for Dalisa County, Texas BEFORE M6, THE UNQERBIGNRD AUTHORITY, a Notary Public in and for said County and,f LOT 11 5040 SO. FT. State, on this day personally appeared Known to se to :i~• ^ be the person whose name in subscribed in the foregoing Instrument and acknowledged to sae that he executed same for the puposes and consideration heroin expressed and in the capacity therein stated. n• sn w 0 GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, THIS THE DAY OF 19 a z Notary Public in and for Dallas County, Texae 7 25 FOOT CLOG LINE in i xx* S'rATF OF IFXAS: COUNTY OF IIFN'ron: SET1/2'14oN ROD 1 9Q0' SfTI/2"IRON NOR 1424 ,1 n r~ N BB° W •0 POINT OF BEOiNNING 10 1, R.J. DADA, Rngimtered Professional Land Surveyor, hereby certify that thin plrr was prepared from a,1 Actual And Accurate Survey, And that tho%. corner F- mot1:tmentm shown thereon were plAred snider my perA011A1 Aupervislon In nccordAnce with the plAlting Tu1rA Anti regulAtlnnA of the City of Denton, '1'rxnA. MILL ~I,4r, c_•►, vtrltLl, 1.,>~,h~ STREET X -,z 1, 4 (60Y • .r L•+ iJ r A n. a. ,In„m sire; 4 a% wt cq f,%J t rMnA VI70, Ln„q 09J, YC)V7 W11090 PRELIMINARY REPLAY s Certificate or Approval LOT I!, 9LOCK 7 ~ ~ • ' • PART OF LOTS 7 8 8 6LK II Approved this nay or A.D. 15 n. o. 119 BLOCK 7 , rnV044 It- by the WY COUNCIL AL ROBERTSON ADDITION P Y ~f the City of Denton, Texaa, o , i, TexeR. ANA DITION TO THE CITY Of DENTON, 4:' ClroAt nays A+j P.-) lip, I, DENTON CgqUN Y YXAg PLAT RECQRbe JANUARY, 1927 b~n~~~ 1 Vol. I P% 19 ot' (Net F:•&It DEED RECORDS OF DENTON BOUNTY, TEXAS Absfrod No. 623. J ,r MAYOR Surveyor, ' 0w*r Secretary 9e c [ et e r r R,J DAUM R.PL S. "NRLEEE ED DEBRA JOMCE WOOgS i PO 1Box 210858 r~,i• i os Y^xnt 78211 ,Jnlon Texas 78205 Drawn. Scale - 1114031 30 FEET SHEET OF 1j'ir S~•i ~ni Checked Dale; Onto; Revisions; gy; MAY, 1992 Job No...~ , 7402, 41 f - - - - ~-r y ~4 Mr rc"°K.~ r ► i « N~ State of Texas: ti »llrll County of Denton: au ; . , 4 rNUlr , . . 1 , rI1~01 ~ , tl IM~I ~.,1 , )yea Woods, hereby accept thix PI as A Ne, John Lte Nooda and wife, Debra Joyce 4100 .lpR I! lrnal * true and correct plat of a Replat of Part of Part of Lat 7 and 8, block 7, of Alen r „ !n ' Robertson AddiVion, Recorded in Volume 1, Page 1, Page 14 of the Deed Records of Denton deactibed as follows; rMr, „ppNnsu~!!}, County, Texas, being more particularly deactit inlllN. rgllrt ! 4~ ,,o i l L wSim BEGINNING at an 1/I 11 h irnn rod set for the cc ar tho-enr-ner comma $CO%: /fo=, l~r='yo, 1+~~!a { S~~ I of said Block 7 in the North RIGHT OF NAY (N z t t °e m !t ! \ 1 i.,a a i V11 14 ~ I THENCE North 88 degrees West with the said No ~foT ~I+ s:lrr#In distance of 48.0 feet to an 1/I inch iron tom 1 % Sca1~ In , ; y.~ls THENCE North 01 degrees 30 minutes Fast depi to maid Lot 8 sad Lot 4 of acid Block S THFNCS South 88 degrees East'mith line common distance of 48;0 feet to a fence post found fc 3 of said Block 7; THENCE South 01 degrees 30 minutes Nest with tt ro ~}i distance of 105.0 feet to a 1/2 Inch iron rod • ~ ~ 1 r'^ Raid Lot 7 and A and the vest line of said Lot 10 4 101,0 feet to the P0114T Or BI!GINNING and contt 142.0 THIS DAY OF 14 4Apo,&, 1 CPI in r; (04-2, V John Lee Woods M1 0 3 IJ zMFI BEFORS HBO TNt UNDMIGNtD AUTHORITY, State, on this day personally appear 1N HOn ►6. w.r•.nn whnai nama is subs 940 SET 1/2" IRON HOD i . Pm 1 W - i ~r zoN►NC~ Ci In a J V) -r - M aaa~ 94 d ~ QIV><N UNDER MT NAND AND REAL Of ONtICg ! 0ltICIs THIS THE DAY Of 1► . 19 a Z w 1 V .Pw W N~ Notary Kblie in and for Da11aa County, Texas 7 28 FOOT DIDG LINE . z z W to J j STATF OF TEXAS. ~ff,52 _ Y7 Q ) COUNTY OF VFNTON; r r . www E 844d SEi 1/2` IRON ROD df nal^Land Surveyor, hereby certify that this 1 at+d accurate Survey, nmt that cite corner tttider my perreorcal iups.rvixion lit nrrordAtire IMIN of the City of ftenrorr, Texnr. 1 1 rns~.~ MILL r T'4n 0f1, (11 A I e r1c,"1#44ooS ANA Catj~;-60.'t) ['AsGb o~J Gt4-y Tb f (nft4l IF Date; Revislone; Douro, Registered Profeaslonal Land i pint wee prepared front an octue. end eCi r EeiSTi~IC~ 8 $AN Sri. _ morinmente ehown thereon were placed m,ider x C.+t.I nc ~r~~rn►~ ~`~~Vtil f with the plotting ruled end regulotlorta of s rwrr X (60) r^ Y r NC, . _W ~ r Cwt ~.+N _ w_ S 7 c~ i- f Y (p r 1 ■i 1 r i F G •~~__~_„A R.J. DAllro Registered Proteettlnnel Land S, T Certificate of Approve) PRELIMINARY REPLAT i 1.0 I I, BLOCK 7 ,rte + FART OF LOTS 7 8 8 ELK. I I Approved this BLOCK 7 Day of - A. D. 19 - - - - ALEX ROBERTSON AW i by the f,ITY COUNCIL of the City of Denton, Texee. AN ADDITION TO THE CITY 01 UENTON COUN Y EXA QKT ' 0''0.'' PLAT REC Y6 JAN' ti 1 I ILI tna~~cia rya, Mayor and City Council June 23, 1992 Page 2 PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS ORR GROUPS-AFFECTED: N/A FISCAL, PACT: An addition to the tax base of the City of Denton. Respect ly si mi d' ~ Prepared by: Lloyd Harrell City Manager G. Owen YOS Urban Plaw.,er Approved: rank H. Ro bins AICP Executive Director Planning and Development AXX00184 Ia,~ _...G v NORTH P-92-018 Alvin & Charlotte Whaley Addition 1~- ~AUER GR. FA P L I ~ kf J w HOLl.6M ~ S\ ~ ~zl ~i1 ~ N~ 3.°o~G I eS If `I1tr i MI1 \ Iz HOSR_lini_ v pis 4~`~+GOI'u~lJ E ~~t D~ O NAB. 119p A I ~ 380 HWY, 380 HWY - - UPI SC~flOI ~ \ \ ITE a 1 ;D S. 0 } n 4' ~ a I lp MC e ^ MM f SCRIPTURE _ Scale: NONE Date. 6120192 I "No NORTH Cracker Barrel S~S r r r n• ` C ~ 1CJ '1 \111 rye 1~.~~I f{iA1 LOT i,.~ spur I' ~~Ir~ k 1 { ~ a ~l n1 ~ ICI: ti 1. ~ l1 1 w an.1 H.rr,rrYU r-~ /'~1 1 \ 1 ~1~ ~ LOT IR ~ ~ r ` L I ! i rN ,11 S J~ 1dr"°. I ~ f i J lit I ~l f~b~~• aa~ ~01 ~ i 1 t ~ I r ~ • Miry yly~.I - rltl/ni.~+- ~.ti..1I-~1 *EST ia111kia VIY..~ __I ~ - -t1C~-FMAFIMMY" 3AC,1' ~I.i / fur two- PRELIMINARY REPLAT Date: 613192 Scales NONE n~ Honda ~Ql1_ Minutes PLANNING AND 'ZONING COMMISSION June 10, 1992 The regular meeting of the Planing and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas, was held on Wednesday, June 10, 1992, at 5;00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of City Halt, Present: Jim Engelbrecht, Ivan Glasscock, Mary Evelyn Huey, William Kamman, and Fran Morgan I Absent, Judd Holt and Marvin Willis Present from Staff: Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning and Development; Owen Yost, Urban Planner; Harry Persaud, Senior Planner; David Salmons, Engineering; Gerald Cosgrove, Water/Wastewater, Cecile Carson, Administrative Analyst; and Donna Miker, Planning 'T'echnician Vice-chairman Kamman called the meeting to order, 1. Minutes It was moved by Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Mr, Engelbrecht, and unanimously carried (5.0) to approve the minutes of the May 13, 1992, regular meeting, 11. Consent Agenda Motion was made by Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Mr, Engelbrecht, and unanimously carried (5.0) to approve the consent agenda as follows: The General Development Plan 24,6259 acres located at University Drive and I.35. b, The preliminary replat of Lot 1, Block 1, of the Alvin and Charlotte Whaley Addition, plus approximately ,588 acres of unplatted land, C. The preliminary and final replats of portions of Lots 7 and 8, Block 7, Alex Robertson Addition, III, Consideration of acquisition of 1.825 acres at the Spencer Road Power Plant was withdrawn from the agenda, IV, Work Session. a. Sign Ordinance - 1 {.C I T Y - - ~z COU~C.IL~ } ~oooaaaaooooo Op~O + e N ~GO6 . j -o C O a o do Q. j op0 ~ r o N s~ °0~oodcanc~0~° t ALI,0O01F 4011111 Fla, .,__7 '0/ hgenda Itrrrl- ~5. " ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVID- ING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated com- petitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and WHEREAS, the City council has provided in the City Budget for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the ma- terials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted herein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I, That the numbered items in the following numbered bids for materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid Proposals" attached herto, are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids for such items: BID ITEM NUMBER NO VENDOR AMOUNT 1365 ALL WFSCO $24,750.00 1370 ALL HOWARD-MCANFAR EQUIPMENT 522.167.00 SECTION II. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the terms, specifications, standards, quantities and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid proposals, and related documents. ye ::a_w SECTION III. That should the city and persons submitting ap- proved and accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bids, the city Manager or his designated reprejentative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions, spec- ifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained in the Bid Proposal and related documents herein approved and accepted. SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered tems of the submitted bids, the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective imme- diately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: Aij,mUa !:ern„-_ees - a DATE: June 23, _-_yZ- CITY COUNCIL REPORT .yo~ .y / TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID # 1365 - 300 KVA PADMOUNTED TRANSFORMERS RECO14MENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder, Wesco in the amount of $4,950.00 oach for a total award of $24,750.00. Delivery is 7 - A weeks after receipt of order. SUMMITRY: This bid is for the purchase of five (5) 300 KVA Padmounted electric distribution transformers. These units are being purchased to serve Exposition electrical Mills with service, They will be Utility as a portionof the loop feed designed ~forathe E position Mills projectnicipal Seven bid responses were received in reply to the seventeen notices mulled. BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Distribution Division and Exposition Mills Development. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this purchases will be taken from Electric Utility Revenue account 610-080-0252-C045-9222-203, Respectfull submitted: Lloyd V Farrell City Manager Approved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent TS/Jh 270. DOC BID EVALUATION 1365 03-Jun-92 03:26 PM 300 KVA 120/208 LOOP FEED ANUFACTURER F QUANITY NL TL LF PRICE EM PRICE DELIVERY WK VENDOR MANUFACTURER-F- TECHUNE HOWARD 5 -504 ----3432 0.38 $a~230 $60,325 10-U GRAYBAR _ JIMELCO 5 887 3292 _ 0.38 $5,383 $64,081 4--5- - --TEMPLE INC GENERAL ELECTRIC 5 577 3415 0.38. ,44498 $62,776 15-17 POLEUNE ELECTRIC__PAUWELS 5 546 2901 0.38 671 $60,875, 12--_14_ PRIESTER SUPPLY COOPER--__ 532 _ 3297 _9.38 _ $_,-5 514 -1,831114-16 SESCO SESCO b 1030 4150 --0,38 $-6 499 77,96131 - 6-8- WESCO ___-----------______5 --_542 -----2974-.__---0.38 $41950 $56 166 - -8------ LOW BID WESCO$56,166 _7--8 l6 Y] ~ N v ' l iD O 1 u2~tvi✓' BID N 1365 I I I I I I BID NAME KVA PADMOUNTED I TECHLINE I POLELINF. I PRIESTER GRAYBAR I TEMPLE TRANSFORMERS I I I I i OPEN MAY 28, 1992 I I I I { N I ^ITEM DESCRIPTION i VENDOR i VENDOR VENDOR { VENDOR I VENDOR { _I I I_ _i I_ I_ I I I I I I ! I I i E I I I l.i PADMOUNTED TRANSFORMER $5,230.00 $5,671.00 I $5,514.00 I $5,383.00 i $5,498.00 I I i I I I f { MANUFACTURER I HOWARD I PAUWELS I COOPER I JIMELCO I GE I I I I I I I DELIVERY I 10-12 I 12-14 { 14-16 I 4-5 I 15-17 I I I I I I LOAD LOSSES NLt I 504 I 546 I 532 i 887 I 577 TLt I 3042 I 2901 I 3297 I 3292 I 3415 IMP. 2.07 { I { I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I BID N 1365 I I I I { I i I I BID NAME KVA PADMOUNTED I SESCO WESCO I I I TRANSFORMERS { I i I I OPEN MAY 28, 1992 I I I I { i ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VFNDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I . 1 I I I I I i ~ N SV 1.1 PADMOUNTED TRANSFORMER I $6,499.00 I $4,950.00 { I I I •r I f I 1 III a MANUFACTURER f SESCO f ABB I I { I I I I i I I i I~ DELIVERY I 6-8 I 7-8 I I I I Lls I I I I I I ~I t i t I LOAD LOSSES NLt i 1030 I 542 I I Ii~ Q TLt I 4150 I 2974 { I I fI a oQ IMP. I I I I I ~I ~sa~ak DATE: JUNE 23, 199klGe ___/P = 3_-__f_Z CITY COUNCII, REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID # 1370 - LEASE OF SCRAPER RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid bo awarded to the lowest bidder Howard- McAziear Equipment Co, in the total amount of $22,167.00, SUMMARY: This bid is for the lease of two (2) Caterpillar 6238 self loading scrapers including pickup and delivery. The machines will be utilized for an excavation project at the City of Denton Landfill, Three (3) bid responses were received from the eight (8) notices mailed. BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Solid Waste Landfill Operations. - FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this lease will come from 1991-92 budget funds account #830-029-08,,:3-8509, Landfill operations special services. Respec ully submitted: Lloyd V, Harrell City Managor Approved: Name: Tom ll, Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent TS/jh 271. DOC M,}onda Ptu.._~a BID k 1370 HOWARD I DARR + T-K-U REQUIP i EQUIP CO. i EQUIP CO. BID NAME LEASE OF SCRAPER i MCANECO' I I I OPEN JUNE 2, 1992 j I r I - _ __I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR VENDOR _ I I 2 EA LEASE OF SCRAPER i $10,000 EACH i $13,500 EACH ; $10,200 EACH I CATERPILLAR CATERPILLAR I CATFRFILLAR MAKE I I I I I I I 623 I 623 623E MODEL I 2.1 2 EA DELIVERY i $541.91 EACH i ;700 EACH i $500 EACH 3 I 2 EA PICK UP $541.91 EACH j $700 EACH $500 EACH I I I I I I I I I I $22,167.84 I $29,800.00 I $22,400.00 TOTAL i I I I CITY COUNCIL t A - - ooo°°~°o°aonaoooopoop o a Uppyr0 v SE~Cp ~~~4QOCOGGDbc'°{ ' ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD Or CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated com- petitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREA-61 the City Manager or a designated employee has receiv- ed and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works or im- provements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and plans and specifications therein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the following competitive bids for the con- struction of public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invitations", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City's Purchasing Agent filed according to the bid number assigned hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as be- ing the lowest responsible bids: BID NUMBER CONTRACT-PE AMOUNT 1376 FLOYD GLENN SMITH $ 12,901.00 << 1374 90YD EXCAVATION $ 13,180.00 1388 SOUTHWEST INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTORS $138,636.00 SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the bid for construction of such public works or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such person shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice to Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notification of the award of the bid. _ Ia. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to SECTION execute all necessary written contracts for the performance of the construction of the public works or improvements in accordance with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such contracts are made and document accordance rel ting thereto specifying rthente$ms,Propos- als, condi- w rl~enda It/em__~S tions, plans and specifications, standards, quantities and speci- fied sums contained therein. SECTION IV. That upon: acceptance and approval of the above compe'citive bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and improvements as authorized herein, the City Council here- by authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized contracts executed pursuant thereto. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective im- mediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY. Agenda Itern_~S DATE: JUNE 23, 194c - ~O--; ^9%L /D CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1366 - WILSON STREET SIDEWALK IMPROVMENTS ItEcoMMEND„ AT--- ec $12e`nd tills bid be awarded to Floyd Glenn Smith contractors in the amount s01 - 00 SUMMARY-. bid Is for aitdisia sidewalk 13 Orfeet ~flTim hid includes all labor and BradshaY Street to RUddell, ce with all U materials as well latiot spfornCommu qty Dev lopmenttBl ck Grant ContracttsUr an Development Rego only one bid was received from thirty four (39) notices mailed. The bid price was below our engineeAgi esimafor the project and Floyd Glenn Smith has performed quality work on p projects- Senior Civil BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet, Memorandum from David Salmon, Engineer. PRO-RAMSd the ART ENT ton GROUPS AFFECTED: Comrnwlity Development Division an FISCAL IMPACT Funds for tills project will come from account #219-056-CDfiES-8509. CDBG funds for Wilson Street Sidewalks. submitted: ` 41 rell 4C.111~tyvcianager Approved: P. M Namo: TG urchasing Agent Title: TSljh 272.DOC Apnnda No Agendaltem_-~5~ BID N 1366 I I L~ /p ! I SID NAME WILSON STREET FLOYD GLENN I SIDEWALK i SMITH I OPEN JUNE 2, 1992 ! i I I N ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR i VENDOR i TOTAL I $12,901.00 I 1 I I I ~ I BID BOND I YES i I I I I i ! ~ I I I I I ~ I d4+/9 ~ Apnnda PJo. A(jenda item_~S - e , Nic /D CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM DATE: June 4, 1992 T0: Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent FROM: David Salmon, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Wilson Street Sidewalk Bid Please process this bid for the next available city council meeting. Although only one contractor bid on the project, the prices are extremely reasonable, The total bid is much lower than our estimate. Obviously, Floyd Smith is a qualified contractor and we should receive top quality work. u _ David Salmon xc: Barbara Ross AEE0016B 8171566.6200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 ,WWI Agonda No. Mpnd,i DATE: JUNE 23, 19921~i1o CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1374 - DEMOLITION AND CLEARING #19 RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder, Boyd Excavation in the amount of $132180.00, • SUMMARY: This bid is for the demolition of existing structures and the clearing of six (6) sites designated by the Community Development Department. 1) 625 Mill Street 4) 222 Normal Street 2) 538 Maddox Street 5) 15,12 N. Elm Street 3) 335 Mill Street 6) 2303 Conway Street Each site will be cleared and leveled suitable for mowing, Trees will remain undisturbed where demolition work will permit. BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet, Memorandum from Barbara Ross, Community Development Administrator, PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Community Development and the Citizens of Denton. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this project will come from account #219-056-CD67-8502 Community')ovelopment Department. Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V, Ilarrell City Manager Approved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent TS/jh 273,DOC BID ,w 1374 I I I I I I I I I I I ! BID NAME DEMOLITION & I GARY STEVENS 1U.S. EXCAVATIONI ATS SERVICES IBOYD EXCAVATIONI KENNETH I CLEARING 019 I & MINING I (TELCO SALES) I ! SENNETT I OPEN JUNE 4, 1992 I I I I 1 I I I _I I I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 I I I I I I I 1.1 625 SMITH STREET $1,570.00 I $1,250.00 I I $1,300.00 I I I I I I ! I I 2.1 538 MADDOW STREET I $875.00 1 $1,400.00 I $1,200.00 I i I I f I i I I 3.1, 335 MILL I $1,470.00 $1,600.00 I $1,200.00 I I 4.1 222 NORMAL I $5,430.00 I $5,450.00 I I $5,500.00 I I I I I I I I I 5.1 1512 N. ELM $1,200.00 I $2,050.00 I 1 $1,780.00 ( 1 I I I I I I I 6.1 2303 CONWAY 1 $2,900.00 1 $1,850.00 I 1 $2,200.00 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 TOTAL I $13,445.00 1 $13,800.00 1 $280561.00 I $13,180.00 1 $13,650.00 I I I I I I I I I I ALL OR NONE I I ALL OR NONE I I I I I 1 I I r m' ro ~i n sY ro to m 6 1 S o , Agenda itam__LU_~ CITY of DENTON Community Development Office 110 West Oak Suite 6 Denton, Texas 76201 (817) 383.7726 MEMORANDUM Y DATE: June 10, 1992 T0: Tom Shaw, Purchasing Department FROM: Barbara Ross, Community Development Administrator SUBJECT: Demolition #19 The Community Development for $13,180.00 to like to nd clearance Boyd Excavation of the structures in Demolition #19. Please inform us as soon as the purchase order has been approved by City Council. Thank you. Barbara Ross BR:nb l,5er,cla No. AOeada iit:n,~~ DATE: JUNE 23, 1992 0A10 Gv ~_~rZ CITY COUNCIL REPORT yajJ / TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1388 - COOKE COUNTY COLLEGE CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATION: Council approve award of Bid #1388, Cooke County College Construction, to the low bidder, Southwest Industrial Constructors, in the amount of $138,636.00 (base bid including alternates 1 through 7). SUMMARY: Bids were received for the general construction and renovation of lease space for Cooke County College at 608 East Hickory Street, Denton, Texas. Southwest Industrial's base bid is $129,500 and the total amount including all alternates (see tab sheet) is $138,636.00. Fourteen vendors received bid packages and six bid proposals were submitted. BACKGROUND: Tabulation shoot PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Facilities Management Division and Cooke County College. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this project will come from account #100-032-0002-9101. The City of Denton will receive lease payments from Cooke County College offsetting the cost of this project. submitted: R4s ~ Wrrell City Manager Prepared by: Name: elanle Harden Title: Buyer Approved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent 277. DOC BID / 1388 OPENING DATE: 6-17-92 HID TABULATION FORM LEASE SPACF FOR COOKE COUNIII COLLIsGE DENTON TEXAS 92429.00 Z•3 Contractor [lase Hid All. #1 Alt. #2 Alt. #3 Alt. #4 AIL #5 Alt, #6 All. #7 Bond Add. 1 Lamar Waller N Dal-Mac l43 6~s'lq-c +I1gI'oo +1341 oo 3z .av 1016.00 g5I5.00 43clz,oo Hates Construction N s Scobill Construction 1 "19 5v'I • )CO 3~00.~ I DODO J Intercom Construction N Phoenix Commercial ? I O0 , t 17-00-co I000-CO t I sc)-x0 +150.00 1100.00 +2.Z Co. Brian Gansien N 13 Southwest l rd. Uncj-rs. 125 500, vo +~uo,oo i~15z + 550, G0 10-13.00 +z'I5 00 5P8b - I o0o too ✓ BCM Wayne Allen Construction DBR Construction S51oB°I$, +17 -'~b + I Og5'o0 ~a'15 0o fi 10'~S,oO t 64q .co +'52,8000 -3 oci-o J 1~ Holzem Inc. P5'' M0 ° 15oo,oe) }000.Qp ty00,00 -t 1400-00 1400-Co 5500-00 -1,000 -GC V ✓ Jones & Jeffery Construction f~ CBS Mechanical N r fo ' Alternate Number 1: Provide marker boards in Classrooms #201,202,203,2,04 and 217. V - Alternate Number 2! Provide millwork, rough in and sink installation in Room #213, n N Alternate Number 3: Provide gas lines and gas cocks to Room #214. Alternate Number 4: Extend existing millwork In Classroom #210, t Alternate Number 5: Provide electrical outlets at Classroom #204. Alternate Number 6: Provide all new 2x 4' layin ceiling tile throughout areas indicated on RCP Plan 2/A2 and ground floor entry corridor. O ~U Existing ceiling grid to remain, remove all wail paint and debris from existing grid. Alternate Number 7: Time of Complolion. Substantial completion of (lie entire work prior to midnight August 15, 1992. 0` 1 FCIT'y COUNCILI - F p°°aago990dpp~~~o -}ppp0 F N Opv a O ~ o f = .oooQ~caGCCaa°°°~ . ORDINANCE NO. U AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE F FUNDS FOR PURCHASES OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WHICH ARE AVAILABLE FROM ONLY ONE SOURCE AV PUR- ACCORDANCE WITH THE EXEMPTING CHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS F COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND EF- FECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 252.022 of the Local Government Code provides that procurement of items that are only available from one source, including: items that are only available from one source because of mono patents, copyrights, secret processes asn water and other;ufilms, manuscripts or books; electricity, q purchases; captive replacement parts or components for equipment; and library materials for a public library that are available only from the persons holding exclusive distribution rights to the ma- terials; need not be submitted to competitive bids; and r more of the WHEREAS, the City council wishes to procure one THEREFORE, items mentioned in the above paragraph; NOW, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the following purchases of materials, equip- ment or supplies, as described in the "Purchase Orders" attached hereto, are hereby approved: PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT $86,112.00 '!50 IBM $63,328.95 IBM 7.50330 0 SECTIOI-I_I. That the acceptance and approval of the above items shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person comply t quotation for such sp cifieds bytthesPurchasing shall complly y with Department. SECTION 111. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any contracts relating to the items specified in Section I and the expenditure of funds pursuant to said contracts is hereby authorized. AgEndJlu+m_ SECTION IV, That this ordinance shall become effective immedi-al. ately upon its passage and aPPrOv ~ 1992. PASSED AND APPROVED this the - day of BOB CASTLF.BERRY, MAYOR r ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY JENNIFER WALTERS, BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL F: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCHI CITY ATTORNEY f[YS' 7 Apnncfa hlo.._9a ~d ~8---, Allonda lllem_ leS °/e DATE: JUNE 23, 1992 M10 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #25059 - IBM $86,112.00 RECOMMENDATION: We recommend Purchase Order #25029 in the amount of $86,112 to IBM be approved as presented. SUMMARY: Purchase Order #25029 is for the annual renewal of a sole source proprietary maintenance agreement for IBM software licenses. This software is protected by patent and or copyright and only available from IBM. The maintenance agreement allows for both "trouble shooting" the existing system as well as any new releases from IBM. The affected software is the basis for the operation of the Information Services mainframe computer. The cost of this agreement is approximately 5% more than last year. Data Processing Advisor Board recommends approval. Acquisitions of supplies or services available from only one source due to copy rights or patents are exempt from the bid process. BACKGROUND: Purchase Order #25029, Minutes of Data Processing Advisory Board. PROGRAMS I DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFFCTED: Information Services Division, FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this agreement will come from 1991-92 budget funds account number #100-099-0080-8341 Maintenance of Office Machines. Respec lly submitted: Llo V. Harrell City Manager Approved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent TS/jh 275. DOC A{Ii nda No ggrndd [W III MINUTMS OF Nlu Z DATA PROCESSING ADV180RY BOARD MEETING OF JUNE 11, 1992 ME*JBERQ.. FMSENT: Jim Kuykendall, Bob Minnie, Brian Scott MEMBERS ABSENT: cengts Capan and Don Edwards OTHERS PRESENT: Gary Collins, Ray Wells and Chuck Pierce Bob Minnis made a motion the minutes from the March 31, 1992, meeting be approved as written. Jim Kuykendall seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Gary Collins explained that a number of months ago the City of Denton had gent out a bid for 11 personal computers, and the City of Denton Utility Department bid on these computers and submitted the low bid. Gary Collins also stated that since the Utility Department was low bidder for the personal computers, they had to let out a bid for the parts necessary to build these personal computers. Ray wells explained that after bidding the parts COMPUCAN Center in Farmers Branch was low bidder at $18,666. Bob Minnie asked how many computers this would entail, Ray wells responded that these parts would allow them to make 11 computers and that all of them were in the Utility Department with the exception of one personal computer in Customer Service. Gary Collins stated that since Cengie Capan had indicated he could not make this meeting, Gary Collins had called Cengis since the University of North Texas had at one time built their own personal Computers. Cengia had told Gary Collins that approximately 3 or 4 years ago the university started building their own computers because the price differential on building personal computers and buying them was so great. in the last year the university has gone bank to purchasing their personal computers since the price differential had gotten to the point where the university did not feel it was worth the bother. y Gary Collins stated that all of these computers were equivalent to an IBM PS/2 model 80 or above. Ray wells explained that they were all 486 machines with the exception of 2 that were 396 machines and met the specifications outlined by the requesting Department or Division. Gary Collins explained that. the ::next lowest bidder on the original PC bid was Gateway Computers at $24,000 and the highest bidder was IBM at $82,000. Roth Brian Scott and Jim Kuykendall expressed their dissatisfaction with the Gateway Computers their respective companies had ntir.chased, Bob Minnis asked what software was going t.o be used. Tray Wells responded that the software would be standard off the shelf software and each Department or Division would purchase the software they needed. Gary Collins reminded the board that the agnndaNo ._M~ A ici,dj Item _"e~s_- lv , 6-, City had an Adminiatrative Directive regarding thi~,jj, urcha~e ~o' y ' software, so there would be no violations of the copywrite law. Bob Minnie as}: what would we do about warranties. Chuck Pierce responded that the Utility Department would perform all of the warranty work and the parts had 1 or 2 years warranty with them. Brian Scott ask if the machined would have EISA Architecture, Chuck Pierce indicated that the machines would have I5A Architecture. Church Pierce indicated they had found out that the E3A Architecture would add $600 to $900 to the cost of each machine and felt when that capability was needed, they would look at replacing the mother boards and doing a major upgrade of the personal computer. Brian Scott asked Gary Collins what his feelings were. Gary Collins responded that lie was biased and felt very secure in calling 1)3M and knowing they would respond. Gary Collins a~eo stated that the communications group had assured him they would respond in a timely manner and the city was already dependent on this group to maintain the fiber optic lines for the Telephone system and other communications such as the Radio eyetem. Gary Collins expressed his concern about the 3270 connectivity issue and the need for his staff to provide software support to these users. Chuck Pierce responded that they have tested out the 3270 connectivity, Ray wells said that their Department had been instructed by their Executive Director to find ways to save money and this was a way for them to save money. Jim Kuykendall asked if this Division had enough manpower to support these 11 PCs and what they would do if a Police radio went out and this PC went out. Ray wells responded that they had 6 people to service the various equipment they are responsible for and if all 11 PCs went down at the name time there wag a potential for a problem, but that to date they have not encountered problems providing support to the Telephone system, Radio syetem and various computers they now service, Brian Scott asked how much additional memory those personal computers could have. Chuck Pierce responded that they were coming with 4 Megabytes of memory but could handle up to 32 megabytes of memory. Jim Kuykendr,ll asked if the price differential between acceptable assomb.led personal computers and the component parts was not so high would the Electric Department be using this method. Ray wells responded that they had been instructed by their Executive Director to try to save money. Gary Collins added that in conversations lie had with Bob Nelson the Executive Director of Utilities, Bob wanted to at least try th;.s method this time to see if it was not cost effective, wit)i the onder,standing that the City could always revert back to the other proce$6 at a later time. Gary Collins also stated that witb. t.hz~ exception of Customer Service, all of these personal computers were .for use in the Utility Departments and they would he the onoa feeling any adverse Impact and were willing to take that ~is3:. konda,No Brian Scott made a motion that the D.P. Advisory Do%td-raanmmend' the City Council approve the purchase Of personal computer parts from COMPUCAN Center at least this year. Bo)) Minnis seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Gary Collins explained that the purchase recuevt for $86,112 was for the annual renewal of 16 software licenses maintenance for a 12 month period and this was proprieta):y software, Bob Minnis asked how this coat compared with last year's costa. Gary Collins responded it was approximately 5%- greater: than last year. Bob Minnis made a motion that the D.P. Advisory Hoard recommend the City Council approve the renewal of the software license maintenance with IBM. Prian Scott seconded the motion rind it passed unanimously. r Gary Collins explained that the purchase request for $63,328,9$ was for the continuation of the annual maintenance on the IBM hardware and this was the fourth year of the 5 year MSA contract that restricted IBM's price increases to 3% in a single year, Bob Minnis mode a motion that the D.P. Advisory Board recommend that the City Council approve the annual renews.l of this hardware maintenance contract with IBM. Brian Scott seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously, Gary Collins reviewed the proposed budget of the information Services Department with the 0,2 Advisory Board. There being no need for action none was taken, There being no other business the meeting was adjourned. THIS IS A CITY of DENTON, TEXAS CONFIRMING ORDER PURCHASE ORDER NO: pL 25029 (IF MARKED) XX This number must appear on all In vices, delivery slips, cases, DO NOT DUPLICATE dns„ boxes, packing slips and bills. Req No: Bid No: D Dale: 06 08 92 Page No, 01 ENDOR PURCHASING O1V1SION 19018 TEXAS STREET 7OENTON, TEXAS 76201 81713837100 O/FIN ME FPO 8171267-0042 FAX 8177382 4692 AME/ DDRE FEL ECX 660176 DELIVERY CONFIRMATICw ChLY C11 DRESS ADDRESS INFCRMATICh SEFLICES DALLAS TX 75226 3248 E. MCKINNEV DENTON* TX 76901 VENDOR NO. 11152500 DELIVERY QUOTED 06 15 92 FOB DESTINATION TERMS 01 86112,6000 SS ENDOR CAT* N N'/ A MFG NAME 14000 660119*00 CI7Y A 92921 IBM SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE CA q U PAGE TCTAL 8 •1 2400 GRANC TOTAL I 8 e1 2400 01 100 044 0080 6521 66*112.00 6\ VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS: 3, terms - Net 30 (Unless olBo(wlse snecilied) 1. Send original invoice vjilh duplicate copy. 4. Shipping Instructiom FOR Desllnallon prepold (unless omerwise sneciileo zyr u!rz>+l, Bill to - Accounts payable 6. No federal or stale soles tax shall be Included 216 E. McKinney 51. In prices billed. Purchosinq Division h....l..n TV ~R nnr ' Agenda DATE: JUNE 23, CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Iiarrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #25030 - IBM $63,328.95 RECOMMENDATIOnd Purchase order #25030 to IBM in the amount of $63,328.95 be approved as presented. Surd re use d by InfformationOservicestDivision 'his entraet renewal nIsifor the H IBM and th year of a five year not exceed This CSAIMRSA hardware maintenance icontract is only available fromoffered IBM " therefore exempt from the bid rsP tion 252,020 g General Exeepti ns ,exas Local Government Code, Subchapter B, The Data Processing Advisory Board recommends approval, BACKGROUND: Purchase Order $25031, Data Processing Advisory Board Minutes. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTSORGROUPSAFFECTED:InformationServicesDivision, FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for the contract renewal will come from 1991-92 budget account #100-044-0080-8341 maintenance of office machines. y submitted: ~ila'r 4dfanager W City Approved: ~ Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent 276. DOC !!gend'lIlem~_. 5._^ MI14UTES 0' DATA PROCESSING ADV7 1()RY BOARD 9~f ~Z MEETING OF JUNE i1, 1992 MEMBER.'.' PRESENT: Jim Kuykendall, Bob Minnie, Arian Scott MM23ERS ABSENT: Cengis Capan and Don Edwards OTHERS PRFSENT1 Gary CD11ins, Ray Wells and Chuck Pierce Bob Minnie made a motion the minutes from the March 31, 1992, meeting be approved as written. Jim Kuykendall seconded the motion and it pawed unanimously. Gary Collins explained that. a number of months ago the City of Denton had sent out a bid for 21 personal computers, and the City of Denton Utility Department bid on these computers and nu6mitted + the low bid, Gary Collins also stated that since the Utility Department was low bidder for the personal computers, they had to let out a bid for the parts necessary to build these personal computers. Ray wells explained that aftea2 bidding the parts C014PUCAN Center in Farmers Branch was low bidder at $18,666, Bob Minnie asked how many computers this would entail, Ray Wells responded that these parts would allow them to make 11 computers and that all of them were in the Utility Department with the exception of one personal computer in Customer Service. Gary Collins stated that since Cengie Capan had indicated he could not make this meeting, Gary Collins had called Cengis since the University of North Texas had at one time built their own personal computers. Cengis had told Gary Collins that approximately 3 or 4 years ago the university started building their own computers because the price differential on building personal computers and buying them was so great, In the last year the university has gone back to purchasing their personal computers since the, price differential had gotten to the point where the university did not feel it was worth the bother, Gary Collins stated that all of these computers were equivalent to an IBM PS/2 model 80 or above. Ray wells explained that they were all 486 machines with the exception of 2 that were 386 machines and met the specifications outlined by the requesting Department or Division. Gary Collins explained that, the next: J.owest bidder on the original ESC bid was Gateway C:ompv.tea: s at $24,000 and the highest bidder was IBM at $82,000. Both Brian Scott and Jim Kuykendall expressed their dissatisfaction with the Gateway Computers their ~especti.ve companies bad purchased, Bob Minnis asked what software was going to be used. Ray WeI18 responded that the software would be standard off the shelf software and each Department: or bivisi.~~n would purchase the software they needed, Gary Collins reminded the board that the i C A'~!C''lUd ite/.,w--_-9A City had an Administrative Directive regarding 0k6 purchase- software, so there would be no violations of the copywrite lav Bob Minnie ask what would we do about warranties, Chuck Piersk responded that the utility Department would perform all of the warranty work and the parts had l or 2 years warranty with them, Brian Scott ask if the machines would have EISA Architecture, Chuck Pierce indicated that the machines would have ISA Architecture. Church Pierce indicated they had found out that the ESA Architecture would add $800 to $900 to the cost of each machine and felt when that capability was needed, they would look at replacing the mother boards and doing a major upgrade of the personal computer. Brian Scott asked Gary Collins what his feelings were, Gary Collins responded that he was biased. and felt very secure in calling 173M and knowing they would respond. Gary Collins also stated that the communications group had assured him they would respond in a timely manner and the city was already dependent on this group to maintain the fiber optic lines for the Telephone system and other communications such as the Radio system, Gary Collins expressed his concern about the 3270 connectivity issue and the need for lixe staff to provide software support to these users, Chuck Pierce responded that they have tested out the 3270 oonnectivity. Flay Wells said that their Department had been instructed by their Executive Director to find ways to save money and this was a way for them to save money. Jim Kuykendall asked if this Division had enough manpower to support these 11 PCs and what they would do if a Police radio went out and this PC went out. Ray wells responded that they had 0 people to service the various equipment they are responsible for and if all 11 PCs went down at the same time there was a potential for a problem, but that to date they have not encountered probleme providing support to the Telephone system, Radio system and various computers they now service, Brian Scott asked how much additional memory these personal computers could have, Chuck Pierce responded that they were coming with 4 Megabytes of memory but could handle up to 32 Megabytes of memory. Jim Kuykendall asked if the price differential between acceptable asnembled personal computers and the component parts was not so high would the Eleotric Department be using tbis method. Ray wells responded that they had been instructed by their ?'executive Director to try to save money. Gary Collins added that in conversations he had with Bob Nelson the Executive Director of UtillL-ies, Bob wanted to at least. try this method this time to see if it was not cost effective, with, the +.inder,titanding that the City could always revert back to tl.e ot.hez pxocgss at a later: time. Gary Collins also stated that with t:1»- exception of Cuotomer Service, all of these personal c.omputei.s 1-yere for use in the Utility Departments and they would be the oneo feeling any adverse impact and were willing to take that Li No -e9 11 hyeAl 11c i1_~s ~,lo ,C Brian Scott made a motion that the D.P. Advisory BoblrYd__reaomme d.__-... the City Council approve the purchase of personal computer parts from COMPUCAN Center at least this year. Bob Minnis seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. fury Collins explained that the purchase request for $86,112 was for the annual renewal of 16 software licenses maintenance for a 12 month period and this was proprietary software. Bob Minnis asked how thin coat compared with last year's costs. Gary Collins responded it wane approximately 3% greater than last year. Bob Minnis made a motion that the D.P, Advisory Board recommend the Cit maintenance Council approve IBM, Brian Sc tt seconded thef motion land nit passed unanimously. Gary Collins explained that the purchase request for $63,328.95 was for the continuation of the annual maintenance on the IBM hardware and thin wag" the fourth year of the 5 year MSA contract that restricted IBM's price increases to 3% in a single year. Bob Minnie made a motion that the D.P, Advisory Board recommend that the City Council approve the annual renewal of this hardware maintenance contract with IBM. Brian Scott seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously. Gary Collins reviewed the proposed budget of the Information Services Department with the D.P Advisory Board. There being no need for action none was taken, There being no other business the meeting was adjourned. THIS IS A - U11Y Ot "LIV IUN, 1EXAS CONFIRMING ORDER - (IF MARKED) XX PURCHASE ORDER NO: DO NOT DUPLICATE This number mbsl appear on all FC 26030 Invoices, delivery slips, cases, A clns., boxes, packing slips and bills. Req No: Bid No: \ Date: 111 92 Page No. Ol DL VENDOR PURCHASING DIVISION /9018 TEXAS STREET/DENTON, TEXAS 76101 VAME/ ZEN 81`71383,7100 D/FW METRO 81 7/26 7 0042 FAX 817/387.4692 40DRESS P C 8OX 660176 DELIVERY CGNFIRMATION GNLY C11 DALLAS TX 75224 ADDRESS Iir9i=CRMATICN SEFVICES 3240 Eo NCKINNEY DENTON• TX 76201 VENDOR NO. 11152500 DELIVERY QUOTED 06 15 92 FOB DESTINATION TERMS 01 63328.960 SS ENDDR CAT• 0 N / A MFG NAME CITY N 93921 1.000 68.a2t$•9f IBM HARDWARE MAINTENANCE r r io m w a z in q PAGE TOTAL E r c^ •5E 01 100 '044 0060 6941 63.32E•95 GRAND TOTAL S 6 • 2 •9: VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS: 1 I I. Send original Involce with duplkaIe copy. 3. Terms --Net 30 fum"s otherwise spec od l 2. Bill to - Accounts Pays No 4. Shipping Inslrucllons: F.O.B. Destination prepaid (unless otherwise spedhedl 21ti E. McKinney 5t. S. No federal or s(alo sales tax shall be Included ripninn 18 E. TX McKinney In prices billed. Hsu 2 Purchasing Division ~ :CITY,- -COUNCILI Y ~ 1. "3: YR `GOOOOaaouaooQOOOO~o t GG ~ y ~~O - O z d - o dF / o C - ~C O { . 4^COEG9a`~~~ t $ 4 14. I'LL e:urdocs\cergan,ord Aran+iUa klan___(C! ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AU'T'HORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT HIRING CORGAN ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES IN C01414PCTION WITH THE MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. RECREATION CENTER AND AFTICIPATED FUTURE LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; ,ND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute an agreement hiring Corgan Associates Architects for r professional consulting services in connection with the Martin Luther Bing, Jr. Recreation Center and anticipated future " litigation. SECTION III That the expenditure of funds therefor as set forth in the agreement is hereby authorized. SECTION IIT. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A.:Di7IS7TCH, CITY ATTORNEY r _ Agenda a~9 CONSULTING SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND CORGAN ASSOCIATES AA.'-i'ITECTS The CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, a home rule city slcuated in Denton County, Texas, hereinafter called "City", acting herein by and through its City Manager, together with Corgan Associates Archi- tects, hereinafter called "CONSULTANT", hereby mutually agree as follows; I. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES CITY desires to contract with CONSULTANT for consulting services in anticipation of future litigation surrounding the Martin Luther King, Jr. Recreation Center in Denton, Texas and in an effort to diagnose and propose solutions to problems at this facility. II. CONSULTANT'S SERVICES CONSULTANT shall render services necessary for the development of the project as outlined below. CITY and CONSULTANT understand that these services are contemplated in anticipation of future litigation, and CONSULTANT agrees to keep confidential all data and work product made available to it or arising out of the performance of these services to the extent allowed by law. CONSULTANT shall exercise the same d9gree of care, skill and diligence in the per- formance of these services as is ordinarily provided by a profes- sional consultant under similar circumstances. In the course of performing the duties enumerated below, CONSULTANT agrees to assist CITY's building operations superintendent and attorneys, and other CITY personnel as may be required. CONSULTANT's duties shall include the following: 1. Perform Geotechnical and Architectural analysis services in accordance with the attached letter of April 9, 1992, which letter is hereby incorporated as if fully set forth herein. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for supervision and control of all subcontractors performing services in connection with this letter. 2. Perform additional consulting services as needed in con- nection with anticipated future litigation surrounding the design of the Martin Luther King, Jr. Recreation Center in Denton, Texas. CITY and CONSULTANT recognize that the possibility exists that the scope of these services may be expanded in the future to include expert testimony by CONSULTANT; however, such services are not a part of this agreement at the time of its formation. D ~ TTI. TERM OF AGREEMENT CONSULTANT shall commence rendering services upon execution of of the agreement have been satisfied be in effect until allster msement. This agreement thi IV. COMPENSATION TO HE PAID CONSULTANT CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT for the services performed here- under as follows: • performed by CONSULTANT in connection with A. Services Exhibit "A", the attached letter of April 9, 1992 will be compensated by CITY as set forth ii,; the letter, which is hereby incorporated into this agreement. out B. scopelofaExhibitc"AllwillrbedcompensatedAas foll.ows;the 1. Amount of payment for services: CONSULTANT will charge the CITY Paon he yment for actual professional time spent. for time expended Ninety-five vices will based hour upon ex- ($95) ) per for time pals and Seventy--five Dollars ($75) pended by associates. 2. Reimbursement of Expenses: CONSULTANT's expenses shall be reimbursed by CITY at actual cost, with travel d eage prevailing rate app' tion purposes. C. Dates of Payment: CITY will pay CONSULTANT within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice from CONSULTANT. V. SUPERVISION AND CONTROL BY CITY It is mutually understood and agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT that CONSULTANT and all subcontractors are independent contractors and shall not be deemed to be or considered employees the CITY, for the purposes of income tax, withholding, social security taxes, vacation or emo] yeeeab nefit. CITYr shall cnotpehave tion, or any other City PAGE 2 A(lenda I1nm.._.[e5 o supervision and control of CONSULTANT or any employee or subcon- tractor of CONSULTANT, and it is expressly understood that CONSUL- TAN'r shall perform the services hereunder at the general direction of the City Manager of the CITY or his designee. VI. SOURCE OF FUNDS All payments to CONSULTANT under this ag..,,;iment are to be paid by the CITY from funds appropriated by the City Council for such purposes in the Budget of the City of Denton. VII. INSURANCE CONSULTANT shall provide, at its own cost and expense, any and all insurance necessary to protect CONSULTANT in the operation of its business. VIII. INDEMNIFICATION CONSULTANT shall and does hereby agree to indemnify and hold. harmless the CITY OF DENTON from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever, by reason of injury to property or t!A rd persons to the extent directly and proximately caused by the error, omission or negligent act of CONSULTANT in the course of the performance of this agreement, and CONSULTANT will, at its cost and expense, defend and protect the CITY against any and all such claims and demands. IX. CHOICE OF LAW AND VENUE This agreement shall be governed by law of the State of Texas, and venue for its construction and enforcement shall lie in the courts of Denton County, Texas. X. CANCELLATION CITY AND CONSULTANT each reserve the right to cancel this Agreement at any time by giving the other party fourteen (14) days written notice of their intention to cancel. If the Agreement is canceled before completion, the CITY agrees to compensate CONSUL- TANT for services pro-ided and expenses incurred prior to notice of cancellation. PAGE 3 Aganda Item_~S r~ supervision and control of CONSULTANT or any employee or subcon- tractor of CONSULTANT, and it is expressly understood that CONSUL- TANT shall perform the services hereunder at the general direction of the City Manager of the CITY or his designee. VI. SOURCE OF FUNDS All payments to CONSULTANT under this agreement are to be paid by the CITY from funds appropriated by the City Council for such purposes in the Budget of the City of Denton. VIZ. INSURANCE CONSULTANT shall provide, at its own cost and expense, any and all insurance necessary to ;rotect CONSULTANT in the operation of its business. VIII. INDEMNIFICATION CONSULTANT shall and does hereby agree to indemnify and hold. harmless the CITY OF DENTON from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever, by reason of injury to property or third persons to the extent directly and proximately caused by the error, omission or negligent act of CONSULTANT in the course of the performance of this agreement, and CONSULTANT will, at its cost and expense, defend and protect the CITY against any and all such claims and demands. IX. CHOICE OF LAW AND VENUE This agreement shall be governed by law of the State of Texas, and venue for its construction and enforcement shall lie in the courts of Denton County, Texas. X. CANCELLATION' CITY AND CONSULTANT each reserve the right to cancel this Agreement at any time by giving the other party fourteen (14) days written notice of their intention to cancel. If the Agreement is canceled before completion, the CITY agrees to compensate CONSUL- TANT for services provided and expenses incurred prior to notice of cancellation. PAGE 3 a xI. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this Agreement, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this agreement, and the any portions declare they would have enacted such remaining such invalidity. EXECUTED this the day of 1992. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: - LLOYD V. HARRELL CITY MANAGER ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: - APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVIT_CH, CITY ATTORNEY ter' ~'y BY: CORGAN ASSOCIATES ARCHI- TECTS, CONSULTANT BY: TITLE:__ DATE : coroaO.mlk PAGE 4 DATE: JUNE 23, 1992`')end3l CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #25031 - CORGAN ASSOCIATES RECOMMENDATION: We recommend Purchase Order #25031 in the amount of $12,900.00 to Corgan Associates be approved as presented. SUMMARY: This purchase order is for Geotechnical and Architectural analysis of the MLK Recreation Center. The Intent of this analysis is to determine the conditions " present at this project which have caused premature maintenance and to subsequently make recommendations to effect a remedy. The project scope of services is outlined in the attached proposal from Corgan Associates. This analysis will be performed as a professional service and is exempt from the bid process as per Texas Local Government Code Subehaptor B Section 252.22 Genera) Exemptions, BACKGROUND: Purchase Order #25031, Proposal from Corgan Associates. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Parks and Recreation Department. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this project will come from 1991-92 budget funds for Building Maintenance account # 100-032-0002-8301. Respoctft submitted: U Lloyd Harrell City Manager Approved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.m. Title: Purchasing Agent TS/jh 274. I) O C Lei 1 r Ur uciv r viv, i cAwo 901-8 TEXAS STREET PURCHASE ORDER P00110EWt ON,TX7$P17L_ye Aclr, nda Ilem__ _ P, 0, NUMBER NO, 25 031 DATFJVENDOR 6-06-92 C38 C14~(~l1MENT __-l°_ ' y.2 T cDit~looo 7~,~ y VENDOR SHIPTO; CORGAN ASSCICATES CONFIRMATION ONLY Cara 501 ELM sSTREE7 SUI7E 500 FACILITY MGMT 321 E4 N.CKINNEY OALLAS TX 78202 DENTON• TX 76201 ITEM ACCOUNTNUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINEAMOL Ol too 032 0002 0301 0.00 CITY OF DENTON IMPLEMENTATION 12090000 02 100 0T-2 0002 8301 0.00 PHASE MLK RECREATION CEN7ER 0*0 • TOTAL FGR PaC. 12~400~0 The City of Denton, Texas is tax exempt-House BIII No, 20. Reference P,O, Number on all B/L, Shipments and Invoices, Shipments are F 0. S, City of Denton, or as Indloated, By Send Invoices Tot Direct Inquiries To, City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J, Marshall, C, P. M, Purchasing Agent 216 E, McKinney St,, Denton, TX 76201 Tom 0. Shaw, 0, P M, Asal, Purchasing Agent (or as Indloated on Purohase Order) 8171668-8311 DIFW Metro 267-0042 The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer AqiiiiJAn 8~y 9 April 1992 Mr. Bruce Henington Superintendent, Building Operation City of Denton, Civic Center 321 East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Re; City of Denton Implementation Phase Martin Luther King Recreation Center Dear Bruce: We are pleased to present our proposal for Geotechnical and Architectural analysis services for this project. We propose a three phase approach to determine the conditions present at this project which have caused the wooden flooring to experience premature maintenance, and subsequently to make recommendations to effect a remedy. The specifics of these steps and our proposed fees for each Phase are as follows: PHA E GEOTECHNICAL GROUNQ WR'I'ER MONITORING 1. Drill core holes and take samples to analyze for moisture content and permeability, 2. Piezometer tubes will be installed around and under the building to monitor static water levels. 3. A report summarizing the findings will be published. We propose Rone Engineering perform this portion of the work, This work will be supervised by Mr, Charles M. Jackson PIE., Vice President of Rone Engineering, Mr, Jackson has preformed numerous similar investigations with our firm with good results, Proposed Fee $3,500.04 s 920t911)41[)ALI Afl("1161 NO, Mr. Bruce Henington 2 6 April 1992 PHA i II 7 iER CIVIL, MECHANICAL PLUM BIN-C _AND ARCHITECTUKAL DATA 1. Site grading verifications will be recorded on the grounds adjacent to the building. 2. Plan and specification review will be performed. 3. We will enlist the technical services of the American Wood Flooring Association for wooden floor installation standards. 4. Structural review will be preformed by Raymond L. Goodson, Jr„ Inc. of Dallas, Texas, k Proposed Fee $65500.00 PHASE III Compile and resent a summary of all data and make recommendations to the City of Denton in report form. The recommendations will be reviewed with the City for purposes of implementing a remedial construction contract. Proposed Fee $2,900.00 We propose to bill for reimbursables at cost, plus a 1.15 multiplier factor to cover administrative costs. Upon completion of this analysis and report we will give you a fee proposal to produce the documents to implement the recommended modifications. We look forward to working with the City of Denton Parks and Recreational Department on this project. Please call our office if you require further information or more specifics regarding this proposal. Ve truly yours r rent Byers Principal 9202916 VDAL1 - - ==CITY [I H..4 COUNCILl - f - -L.. - - - -1 1 T-T a - - f - - - - ~ - ' p0~Q aUO~QD ~Op~ ~ t y p O O ~~~DO ' E 00`v r~ oaaroGC,,oo Id. 46 6 CITY COUNCIL REPORT-FORMAT PAI) 6- - 41- y2J DATE: June 15, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the city council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Ordinance and Agreement with the Texas Department of Transportation for the installation of signals at three intersections on FM 2181 s RECOMIMENDATION . Approval SUMMAR : The agreement provides for the City to furnish and install five traffic signal controllers for the intersection of FM 2181 (Teasley Lane) with Interstate Highway 35 East frontage roads, Oak Meadows Drive, and Londonderry Lane. The State will reimburse the city up to the sum of $34,180.95 as estimated for these services. DACKG OU D: Two temporary traffic signal controllers will be used to control traffic at the intersection of FM 21VI with the IH35E Frontage Roads during construction (widening) of Teasley. One controller will replace these two after construction and two additional controllers will be installed at the Oak Meadow Drive and LondoMerry Lane intersections. sCity rewill purchase imburse the city install these five controllers. The State will PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Engineering and Transportation Department FISCAL IMPACT: The City of Denison will provide labor and materials for installation of the traffic signal controllers during the road reconstruction of F.M. 2181 (Teasley Lane). This ar roao reconstruction work will take approximately one (1) y complete. Upon completion of the traffic signal installation and states acceptarn"e, the city will invoice for reimbursement up to the maximum amount of the agreement. AEE00116 ~1tlr",d•J 110nt__~S ~ CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 F_, McKINNF.Y / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM DATES June 1, 1992 r Tot Lloyd Harrell, City Manager FROMt Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering 6 Transportation SUBJECTt Traffic Signal Agreements _ FM 2181/Texas DOT The agreement is being revised to reflect scope o:' work changes on the three signals. The Texas Department of Transportation iu allowing us to bill for a more realistic number of hours involved in this, complicated project. Construction on the bridge for Teasley at 135 will require that the old signal equipment be removed, two temporary signals be installed (one on each side) to limit construction exposure to the wiring, and a final system that will operate the intersection in its constructed configuration. As you can see, there are goipg to be significant man hours involved. The State Department of Transportation was reviewing the previous agreements and reeontacted us to be sure that all phases, removal, temporary, and final had been budgeted. We had only budgeted an approximate amount of hours to install the two temporary and then convert one of those to final operational stage. The State ` profers the other type method of operation so we agreed to revise our estimate. Thuy have also agreed to pay for snme detector cards, racks, and miscellaneous equipment that were not previously eligible, The State also felt they could only pay for 20% of the two temporary signal controllers, We will get to keep the equipment with 20% off the purchase price. The reduction for the 808 deduction for the two temporaries is mainly offset by the increased labor charges. We feel the cost estimate attached to the agreement will fairly compensate the City for its involvement in the project, our request Is to place the revised agreement on City Council's next agenda for consideration of approval. J r C t" ARE00168 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 1 etwpdocs~,. rev.o ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CI'T'Y MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE TEXAS STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AN[' UBLIC TRANSPORTA- TION FOR INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLERS ON FM 2181 AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35E, OAK MEADOW DRIVE, AND LONDONDERRY LANE IN DENTON; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I, That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute an agreement with the Texas State Department of Highways and Public Transportation for installation of traffic signal controllers on FM 2181 at its intersection with Interstate Highway 35E, Oak Meadow Drive, and Londonderry Lane in Denton. SECTION II_ That the City Council hereby authorizer, the expenditure of funds in the manner and amount as specified in the agreement, SEC'T'ION III That Ordinances No, 90-103 and 92-065 are repealed. SECTION IV, That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of _ 1992 BOB C;ASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL, FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLERS BY A MUNICIPALITY `Y" THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the State of Texas, act- ing by and through the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation, hereinafter called the "State", and the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, hereinafter called the "City", acting by and through its duly authorized officers as evidenced by ordinance No. hereinafter acknowledged by reference. W I T H F S S E T H WHEREAS, the state owns and maintains a system of highways and " roadways, including FM 2183 and I-35E, in the City of Denton; and WHEREAS, the City has requested the state to reimburse the cost of obtaining and installing traffic signal controllers at the intersection of I-35E and FM 2181, the intersection of FM 2181 and Oak Meadow Drive, and the intersection of FM 2181 and Londonderry Lane, hereinafter called the "Project"; and WHEREAS, the State and City wish to cooperate in the construc- tion of this Project; and WHEREAS, the City desires that equipment be provided that is compatible with standard signal operation; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the city and the State for the City to assist the State in supplying traffic control equipment on the Project; and WHEREAS, on the 29th day of November, 1L..88, the State Highway and Public Transportat4r)n Commission passed Minute order no. 88031, approving the Project; and WHEREAS the State is authorized to enter into an agreement with the City ror the Project pursuant to Article 6673-b, V.A.C.S.; A G R E E M E N T NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreem,ants of the parties hereto to be by them respectively kept and performed as hereinafter set forth, it is agreed as follows: Article 1. contract Period This agreement becomes effective on final execution by the State and shall remain in effect as long as said traffic signal controller is in operation at the described location, or unless PAGE 1 A,~c~n~a X10. otherwise terminated or modified as hereinafter provided. Article 2. Construction Responsibilities A. For all items of construction other than furnishing and installing the traffic signal controller, the State will prepare the construction plans, advertise for bids, and let the construc- tion contract, or otherwise provide for the construction. and will supervise the construction as required by said plans. The State will secure the City's approval of construction plans prior to award of contract. B. The furnishing and installation of the traffic signal con- troller will be part of the construction to be undertaken by the City, and the State will reimburse the City for its contribution to the Project, as prescribed under Article 3, "Compensation." Article 3. compensation A. The maximum expenditure under this agreement without modification is $34,160.95. A cost estimate of the work authorized under this agreement is marked "Attachment A", attached hereto and made a part of this agreement. B. The State will reimburse the city the cost of furnishing and installing the traffic signal controller according to the location and manner of construction shown and described in the plans and specifications. C. The State will reimburse the City for properly supported costs incurred under the terms and conditions of this agreement. Costs incurred prior to the issuance of a written "Work Order" by the the State will not be reimbursed. The State wil reimburse city for labor, equipment use, materials, supplies, penses, and warehouse or material handling charges, if the City has already paid these billings from City funds. Article 4. Payments A. The City shall submit the State's Form 132, Billing State- ment, or other type of invoice acceptable to the state upon com- pletion of the Project and state's acceptance thereof. B. An original and four (4) copies of the Billing Statement should be submitted to the following address: P.O. Box 3067, Dallas, Texas 75221-3067. C. All billing statements shall be properly documented, sum- marizing all coasts by description of for performed, costs, d qunn ity of exteons, materials and devices, unit price, D. The State shall make payment to the city within thirty (30) days of receipt of the City's request fod, pa meat, rprovid. that the request is properly prepared, nd do PAGE 2 Atlaida Il``em...rs,~~ NIP, E. Unsupported charges or charges made after final acceptance v by the State will not be considered eligible for reimbursement. The State will prepare a final audit upon completion of the autho- rized work or at any time an audit is deemed to be in the best interest of the State. Article 5. Personnel, Equipment, and Material A. The City will use labor and supervisory personnel employed directly by the City, and will use city-owned machinery, equipment, and vehicles necessary for the work. in the event that the City does not have the necessary machinery, equipment, and vehicles necessary to perform the work, these items may be rented or leased as necessary at the low bid price submitted by two or more approved bidders. B. The State will reimburse the City for materials purchased other than by competitive bid procedures only if such procedures are jhown to be in the public interest and if the State has given prior approval for the use of said materials. All materials used for the work shall be new and undepreciated. Article 6. inspection of Work A. The State shall make suitable, frequent, and complete in- spection of all materials, equipment, and the work of installation to determine and to permit certification that the Project and its components meet all applicable requirements of the plans and spec- ifications in suitable condition for operation and maintenance by the City after its completion. B. The City will provide opportunities, facilities and repre- sentative samples as may be required to enable the State to carry on suitable, frequent, and complete inspection of all materials and application methods, and sufficient to afford determination and certification by the State that all parts of the installation and the component materials comply with the requirements of the approved plans and specifications. The State will promptly notify the City of any failure of materials, equipment or installation methods, and the City will take such measures as necessary to ob- tain acceptable systems components and installation procedures without delay. Article 7. Maintenance and operation Responsibilities Upon completion of the Project, the City agrees to operate and maintain the traffic signals at its expense as a part of its street system and agrees to assume the cost of all electrical power re- quired for signal operation, including electrical power needed during test periods. Article 8. Termination A. This agreement may be terminated by one of the following conditions: PAGE 3 hdonda hJo...•..Ge~_ A(Joidsltert_! Z_e (1) By mutual agreement and consent of both parties, (2) By the State, by giving written notice to the City as a consequence of City's failure to perform the services and obligations set forth in a satisfactory manner and within the limits provided, with proper allowances being made for circumstances beyond City's control. (3) By either party, upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other. B. If, at any time, the City fails to assume the construction responsibilities as prescribed herein or the maintenance and opera- tion responsibilities for the traffic signals in a satisfactory manner as determined by the State, the State reserves the right to assume the construction responsibilities or to arrange for mainte- nance and operation responsibilities at the expense of the City. Article 9. indemnification To the extent permitted by law, the City shall save harmless the State from all claims and liability due to activities of itself, its agents, or employees, performed under this agreement and which result from an error, omission, or negligent act of the City or of any person employed by the City. The City shall also save harmless the State from any and all expenses, including attorneys fees which might be incurred by the State in litigation or in otherwise resisting said claim or liabilities which might be imposed on the State as the result of such activities by the City, its agents or employees. Article 10. Remedies Violation or breach of contract terms by the City shall be grounds for termination of the agreement, and any increased cost arising from the City's default, breach of contract, or violation of terms shall be paid by the City. This agreement shall not be consid- ered as specifying the exclusive remedy for any default, but all remedies existing at law and in equity may be availed by either party and shall be cumulative. Article 11. Disputes Should disputes arise as to responsibilities and obligations set forth in this agreement, the State's decision shall be final and binding. Article 12. Subletting The City shall not sublet or transfer any portion of its respon- sibilities or obligations under this agreement unless specifically authorized in writing by the State, in the event subcontracts are entered into by the City, the subcontractors must adhere to the provisions of this agreement. PAGE 4 lqpp~ Amendments onsibill1rieS, or Article 13• character, re'p time frame, acted by written aarties C n hanges in the shall be ell both p herein must be executed by obligations au o°thisdagreement Any amendment Insurance work only with City Article 14• erforming ance to the entity P of self-insur City's City, as a self-itheeprotection injuties arising from <<ragrap shall extend damages and rovisions of this t d to force5`for any and all The p and not intend' tate this Agreement. hereto to any other S under benefit of the parties or otherwise, performance for the b are solely grant any rights, contractual create person or entity- and Assigns 9ucoassos.'s transfer its rights or Article 15• otherwise the prior wr The City shall itten not agreement except with l obligations under this consent of the State ,s gooks and Records Inspection of City of the agreement for Article 16• termination the City l, for purpose of and records of the City at The State shall, examine the books erformed by to completion, the amount of work p books, prior of checking The City shall maintain all boo o s, records and other evidence p iin n the purpose termination, the time of contract at Papers , accounting sentativ nes~ars documents, p shall make sdu y eriauthod ori and edv fc The State Shall any or three Y the Stat ate shall to costs incufate aond of its o agreement, tion by the during the contract .h„ directly perti- City which are City's offices a ment under tions the date of final payment records of the making audit examina, from to all such f. or purpose of have access agreement for nent to this tions. excerpt and transcrip Legal Construction contained in this Article 17. provisions aLidillegal, or In more held to be inv illegality, of be he invalidity , and case any for one any or reason, su,h thereof, agreement shall any respect, other provisions illegal, or invalid, shall not a "Oct aCAs if such unenforceable in d contained herein. unenforceability s»all be had onst cnever been shis agreement vision unenforceable pr Laws and Venue with Article 18• Governing and in accordanc artier be construed under regarding the p sha d. Any legal actions in Denton Countyg This agreement Texas. be filed laws of the btate of agreement must obligations under this Texas. PAGE 5 Agenda No. A;lcnda ilaut n.~.. lv . Article 19. Prior Agreements superseded This agreement constitutes the sole a:,d only agreement of the parties hereto and supersedes any prior understandings or written or oral agreements between the parties respecting the within subject matter. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The State and the City have signed duplicate counterparts of the agreement. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: LLOYD V. HARRELL, CITY MA_- NAGER ATTEST: JENNIM, WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: THE STATE OF TEXAS BY: TRAFFIC OFERATIONIS EpJGTNEER ATTEST: BY: SECRETARY control PAGE 6 ATTACHMENT A TO: Paul 1wnCIMkwU FROA: Jeff Gann DA'T'E: May 22, 1992 SUBJECT: Charges To FN 2181 at I-35,FM 218L at Oak Meadow and FM 2181 at Londonderry. Equipment and associated cbsts of installing two temporary traffic signal controllers and cabinets at F,T1,_ 2181 Nwy 1-35 in Donlon are as follows: M Personal, Services HOURS RA'Z'E 'TOTAL Paul Iwochukwki 11raffic Engineer)... 30 @ 14'.'i3 = 591.91) Manny Coronado (t'raff'ic Supervisor). 25 @ 16.85 - .121.25 Jeff Gann (Traffic 't'ech)....... 25 @ 13 85 - 3,11;.25 Les Oibson (Traff.Ic Tech)....... 25 @ 13.21 = 3:30.25 Mike May (Tra(•fic Tecti) 25 @ 12.83 = 320.75{ Consul tanL Cost for Timing Adjustment ...................15 @ 60.00 = 900.00 Cont:ract.or Cost for Manual Traffic Counts = 500.00 Labor cost Sub Total = 3,410.40 E< uipment Cost v COST TOTAL Transyt, 1880CL 8 phase Controller 2 (s 51798 = It, )9(i.00 and Cabinet complete with n11 plugables, and Model 1.2EL LCD Conflict Monitor. Canoga ( 1142-tT ) De Lector 11 @ 137 - 1''718 00 Amplifiers Canoga Power Supplies 2 @ 250 - 500100 Misc. E1ecLrical Items 2 @ 50 - 100 (1) Equipment cost: sub Totsal - 13)944.00 Equipment; reimbursable by TxDOT (.20 x 13,944) 2,'188.80 't'otal coal, (Temporary Signals) - 6,199.20 p~j QQ 01ln ATTACBMhN'l' A ((;0N'I't)) pexu±flltcnf,. i Equipment and associaLed cost's of nstali . ing three trctf'fic sind controllers and cabineLs at, 11ree inLcxtiecti.vti-s. on. Fri 2181, in I)enton are as fol.lotas~ porsoxinl, Sergi Ge HOURS RA'rF.. 'T'O'TAL, Paul ht.uchttl;wu ('T'raffic P:ngIneerl • '10 @ 17.72 ' gib 85 35 6 508,90 t•fatuty Coronado ('l'raf f i c Supervisor 1 ' 35 to 1,1 18.F ,508T IS r af f is 1,CC111 . • • r Jeff Gann ( 95 @ 13.87 ('1'1,afi'i.c 'T'ech).•..•. Les Gibson 35 L 13.17 471.•15 dike Mny ('iral''ic Tecltl....... ;l o @ tlo . oil = 1, 800.00 ul.I knit, Cost fox' STgna, Cike $yttclu•oni;,attiou.... , . . Contrm"tox CusL fc.r "tattual _ I,'~00.Un '1'ra;'f is , Labor ('041, Sub Total 61313.76 . tit}u:itL>ners 1.o=t._I, lhfy COS'T' I'O'I'AI 'Iransyl 188oFL 8 pha:-e C'onirol.ler and Cabinet r:outpiete with all g 5, 708,OU= 11,596,00 pLut;ables & Model 12E], LCD Conf Lict Monitor. 'iran:,.pl t8801;1, C'otttrolier 111(1 Cabinet; (same as above bill for 1 @ t;,15t1,UU- fi,-151l,1l0 pi alliond oprrOAC)u i Canoga I P 12 IT 1 IJetectux' 8 C~ -160.00- 3 , 1180 t10 .Vep1,il'i-rrs. 78G.U0 - Canotzct F'ol~• r~ r S~.tppJ ices 3 o 2(12.00 1 ~ill.t)U 3 w) 50,00 - Misc. items Z•L,fifiB.UU-- IdgnipmenL cost, Sub Total. 'L7,ii81.76 ['01.11 cost, (Permanenl, S igna.l.s ) ;54, 180.9Ci oLai. Project, cost, i l' an} lttest,fulls please cont.acC Pelttl ttanchukt:a nL { 81 7 1 186-83 i8. -r t CITY- t COUNCIL . ~oo~,cnacao~poo 0o pP DE ~p ppp;- oOQGG~ a .v p ~ i _ cpa zo ~ L 0 O . ~O - t ~ i-H l AUtinun NO .....9,? - o ~ CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Il'h TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Ordinance for one-way traffic on Malone Street RECOMMENDATION: ,mfr' Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission (CTSSC) recommends "vU approval SUMMARY: This ordinance will establish one-way traffic from south to north on Malone street from its intersection with scripture Street to a point two hundred feet (200 feet) north of Scripture Street. BACKGROUND: At the point where Jagoe merges with Malone north of Scripture, northbound traffic and southbound traffic on Malone are controlled by yield signs, making northbound traffic on Jagoe the through traffic. This has been a source of public complaint for some Yime. Staff has developed a plan that would rectify this situation. Making the suction of Malone from Scripture to Jagoe one-way northbound would enable implementation of this plan and also provide better safety for the general area. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Engineering & Transportation Department, Police Department, and general public FISCAL IMPACT: About two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) AEE00168 Agenda ItCm._!QS f)Clo 3~_f~~ CTSSC MINUTES a ~ May 4, 1992 ITEM 06 REOUEST FOR ONE-WAY TRAFFIC ON At ONE S_ RETt Iwuchukwu presented the request, He said the proposal is to eliminate the southbound movement on a Small section of Malone Street at the intersection of Scripture. There is approximately 200 feet of Malone street affected from its intersection with Scripture Street to where Jagoe merges with D;alcns. The need to rebuild this intersection was originally brought to the attention of the CTSSC by Marilyn Smith, a former commission member. The commission disdussed possible design features and staff presented a design to rectify the potentially hazardous situation created by geometrical problems. Staff is now ready to implement „ the plan and is soaking a one-way ordinance for this section of Malone to complete the process. Thirty degree (300) angle parking spaces will be created within this section for use by the business community. All businesseu affected, and area residents, have been notified. The doctors' offices were contacted and they are in favor of the improvement. Chadwick asked if warning signs would be installed. Iwuchuwku said yes. "Do Not Enter" signs would be installed on southbound Malone, Iwuchukwu said the northbound traffic lane will merge into the normal flow of traffic on Malone. Buttons and appropriate signage will be installed. STAFF RECOMMENDEDt Approval COMMISSIONERSt White made a motion to accept staff recommendation. Amador seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. CTSSC MEMO April 29, 1992 ITj gFQUEST FOR ONE~A~ 1nAfiFTC ON M_A31JN STREET:. The intersection of Jagce Street and Malone Street has been the subject of favveral CTSSC discussionsin several previous meetings. The i tsue w Marilyn Smith, n based ron her aised bown past member of CTSSC, Ms. personal experience and complaints she receivedfr'm the public. Staff ha¢ presented a plan that was developed to rectify the potentially hazardous ssituation design real edthe problems the geometrical intersection. This plan is now ready for implementation and staff is seeking a one-way ordinance for the section of Malone that would be affected to enable completion of the process. The section to be affected is approximately 200 feet of Malone StrL,,t from its intarsection with scripture Street to where Jagoe merges with Malone. Notices have been mailed out and area business and neighborhood major traffic generators have been invited to the meeting. The doctors' offices nearby have been contacted and they are in favor of the improvement. The parking spaces shown.in the sketch will be marked with narrow angles to minimize conflict with through traffic. Staff recommends approval for an 3rdinanee to convert to one-way traffio, northbound, the section of Malone street et to beginning from 200 feet north SofiScripture, a point app 2 N J 3: n`. O~ U- z Nvl~»8 N NVA88 O v a L) -113/\0' -IdW8ON z r- - o9vr W 1--- aaeoo 41131804 MARIETTA GOBER T ~ JAGO + Z MALONE z NORMAL LOV£LL ~ p ~ D rn m z BRYAN BRYAN D r FRY m 00 eptia0v MARIETTA GOBER N m z JAGO o MALONE 0 rn v NORMAL LOVELL n -o rn ~ Z m m BRYAN BRYAN x W f D r E r FRY_ z W ~ ~---Y-Wajj epua0v rn din-rh w z L Q EGA N J SENA a E1> 0 W it 'NGRESS Fwt m FLOW HOSPITAL f► SCRIPTURE Q PROPOSED 0 Q > a~z ,o ro GL 49 < o a o z m ALL00241\1620.1 aryenda No. 02 -O/ Agenda IIN~r,__.f?S -~.C, ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOP ONE-WAY TRAFFIC FROM SOUTH TO NORTH ON MALONE STREET FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH SCRIPTURE STREET TO A POINT TWO HUNDRED FEET (2001) NORTH OF SAID INTERSECTION WITH SCRIPTURE STREET; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $200.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That Malone Street, from its intersection with Scripture Street to a point two hundred feet (2001) north of said intersection with Scripture Street, is hereby restricted to one-way traffic travelling from south to north. SECTION IT. That when signs are in place giving notice there- of, any person who shall violate the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding Two Hundred ($200.00) Dollars. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective upon the installation of signs giving notice thereof, and the City Se- cretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992, BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY B Y t r -CITY COUNCIL TT"T 7-- TT ooooaoaa oappooo o F o0 P ~ - 0 ~~~Q(IppCCGG'JCt}~0~~ - T J- CITY COUNCIL REPORT ~{:ends (lera___~.5 v~ ` [Ilia TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Mv_ e / v FROM. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager d SUBJECT: CITIZEN COMMENTS AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS DATE: June 23, 1992 RECOMMENDATIONt Approve the ordinance revising City Council Rules and Procedures to provide for citizens to address the Council on agenda items. BACKGROUND: As per the City Council's direction, staff has revised the City Council's Rules and Procedures to allow for citizens to voice their concerns on agenda items without one week prior notification. SUMMARYt The following ordinance provides for a citizen to address the City Council for up to three minutes regarding any agenda item during a regular City Council meeting, It also still provides for notification by 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday prior to the Tuesday meeting in order for a citizen to address the Council for five minutes on any non-agenda item. The memorandum attached provides a brief summary of how citizen comments are structured in City Council meetings in several other cities. Also attached is a draft Request to Speak card which has been adapted for citizens to indicate they would like to speak regarding a specific agenda item. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Denton citizens and customers FISCAL IMPACT: None A0enSlo No, Please advise if I can provide additional information. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Lloy V. Narr.ell City Manager Prepared by; Catherine E. Tuck Administrative Assistant Approved byr suus a~ Assistant to the City Manager V 1 Mrnrla ~`Jn - D/ ciry of DEWON, rEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 568.8307 Office of the CIIy Manager TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: CITIZEN COMMENTS AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS DATE: June 3, 1992 Denton's current policy for citizen comments allows citizens to speak at any public hearing during City Council meetings. The Council recently instituted request to speak cards (please see card attached). Rules for public hearingo are read by the Mayor at each meeting and are also attached. A Citizen Report section at the beginning of each meeting allows a forum for citizens to comment on any Issue. However, in order to be on the agenda, a citizen must contact the City Secretary on Wednesday prior to the City Council meeting in order to be placed on the agenda posted 72 hours before each meeting. The format that other metroplex cities and governmental entities in Denton County follow for public hearings and other citizen forums at public meetings varies. However, most cities have each speaker fill out a card prior to or during the meeting and the Mayor or City Secretary calls upon citizens in the order the cards are received. The following gives a summary of the format that each entity generally uses, Arlington Cards are available before and during the City Council meeting and are distributed by the Public Information officer for public hearings and other citizen comments, For zoning requests, the requestor is given ten minutes at the beginning and five minutes of rebuttal at the end. Others in favor or opposition receivo five minutes to speak. However., if over ten people are signed up to speak, comments are limited to three minutes eactr. Speakers may address non-public hearing items at the end of each meeting with the same time limits. Carrollton Carrollton uses no form to sign up speakers for public hearings or other citizen comments. Visitors are given time at the end of each ada to speak on any itehi other than public hearings. Citizens , may also speak prior to the regular meeting on an agenda item during the briefing session, Speakers may be limited to five minutes during the public hearing and visitors sections due to time constraints. Dallas Dallas uses a public meeting appearance card for citizen speakers. A speaker's list is kept for citizens sign up to speak on agenda and non-agenda items. Citizens must sign up prior to the beginning of the meeting. Citizen comments are only allowed at the two regular Council meetings, not at Council briefings. Citizens are listed in the order requests are received by topic. Denton County The County uses cards for any citizen who would like to speak. People may address any subject that is not on the agenda at the beginning of the meeting, comments regarding agenda items are taken at the time the item is considered. Speakers during a public hearing also are called upon by the names on the cards submitted. All speakers are limited to three minutes of comments. Denton Independent School District Speaker cards are used for any citizen wanting to speak during a public hearing or during the open forum period at the beginning of each meeting. Speakers are requested to limit their comments to five minutes during public hearings and three minutes during the open forum but this is not strictly enforced. Fort Worth Any citizen who wishes to speak on a public hearing or other item fills out a card before speaking. Cards are accepted during the entire meeting. Citizen presentations are the last item on the agenda and may include any issue. Citizens are called upon in the order in which cards are received during the public hearing and also for citizen presentations. Carland Citizens may address the city Council at the end of the meeting on any non-agenda item. They may also address the Council after staff presentation on any agenda item. There is a time limit of 3-5 minutes if many citizens want to speak on an issue. Grand Prairie Citizens fill out speaker cards to speak at Council meetinga. Agenda items may be addressed by a speaker after staff presentation. Comments are limited to 5 minutes per speaker. Other citizen remarks may be made at the end of the meeting during a the citizen comment section. The time limit is 3 minutes, GrapRe Grapevines requests speaker forms be wanting to address filled out b the City Council, A citizen request section is the first item on each agenda and is the time for an any person hearing comments to be voiced. There are no non-public speakers. time time limits on !rvinq Citizens may speak on any Council discusses item on the agenda at the time the it, To address the City Council a City Council member or on other issues, agenda, the City Manager must place it on the Lewisville Lewisville uses a form for citizens to fill out if they would like to speak on a public hearing or other agenda Item, Cards are available before and during the meeting and are returned to the City Secretary, Citizens may also fill out tie cards and record their viewpoint to the Council without speakiri public hearings are allowed ten minutes at the boginn kl and five minutes for rebuttal, Those in o ~ ~ Proponents in to speak. pposition are allowed tutee Anyone wishing to speak on non-public hearing items are limited to five minutes. Speakers are called upon in the order of the agenda item and the order they were received. Citizens may address other subjects not on the agenda during a Citizens/Visitors Agenda time and speakers are limited to five minutes. Mesquite Citizens may fill out a speaker card indicating they wish to speak on a particular agenda item register their au , do not wish to speak but want to during the citizen forumoportionooftthe m8etin ' or wish to speak be commented on at the time the Council considersA hem. items may The citizen forum section is limited to 3 minutes at the beginning of the meeting. No more than 10 citizens may speak during this time and personnel matters may not be addressed. if the citizen wishes the City Council to discuss or take action on hidiher request, the citizen must request to be on the agenda on Monday at noon, one week prior to the City Council meeting. Plano Citizens may speak on agenda items at the time of Council discussion, A general discussion section is provided for any other citizen comments at the end of the meeting. Citizens are given 5 Af oid,t 11m31_ minutes for city-related items onl y per citizen. Speaker cards are also uised to ihelpof thr e topics ~e1 9 who wish to speak. Identify Please advise if I can provide additional information, RESPEC ULLY SUBMITTED, D L oyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared byi L Catherine E. Tuck Administrative Assistant City , REQUEST TO SPEAK 0fs AN AGENDA ITEM ~5 . ~O Cr you wish to address the City Counci ( jA(Yo lenMa ~i calt,J WELCOME to the Denton C if itCouncil meeting) The CiY Counci~ he you at this meeting. I Y ) speak has low. This please follow the format outlined i on soethat everyone who swishes to upon you in an orderly opportunity, Council on an agenda item is 1, Any person wishing to address the City Opposite side of this card. requested to please complete the form eak ate the approprlate time o the items 2, The Mayor will call your name to sP uat hearing agenda. Speakers are limited tother gendaIt ms, on and three minutes each on any forward to the speaker's podium, lease step our comments to the Mayor and 3. When addressing the Council, please direct y state your name and address, City Council. public meetings observe ore, Please refrain from private 4, The council requests that citizens attend ng xpressing esior rules of decorum ThBaerefker by applause of other fors Of l i ng your Thank conversations while "howithaspea sesbyo e8= d her discussion agreement or disagreement everyone to h ' demonstration. This will allow you for your assistance. PLEASE RETURN THIS CARD TO THE CITY SECRETARY BEFORE THE MEETING BEGINS. REQUEST TO SPEAK ON AN AGENDA ITEM PLEASE T DATE NAME - PHONE ADDRESS ZIP CODE CITY AGENDA ITEM speak ins A, I wish to speak on this item. I will Support Opposition but would like the B. I do not wish to speak on this item, Council' following comments circulated to the City five hearing speakers is minutes and three Time limit for P enda items. minutes for all other g ALL00275\210,2, f~3Jtr , AN No. AN ORDINANCE ENDTNG OF PROCEDURE SECTION I OF PRESENTATIONS F13 OR TTiE CITY ORDINANCE q COUNCIL MEETTNGSY CITIZENS ANCOUNCIL OF UENTON15p PROVIDING RU EFFECTIVE DATE ' PROVIDING A SET IME LIMI'T'S OF ' TEXAS; AMENDING ERABILITY CLAUS BUSINESS FO ING THE COUNCIL of E; AND DECLARING CITY THE CITY OF AN DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: C 1; of Pro educe of Section T amended 'by the Cit of Ordinance Citjzens+l ~tha amendment y Council of NDent o' 90-150 adopt agraph hereafter be anParag"Ph °6.s anti e6 ' 4 entitledToPYe' ysn hereby read 5 follows; Time Ljmjta,{ sentation by 6'4 Prase tation which shall wishes to place b Citiz ens. (a regular C a subject on the Any Person ManagertsOffice obit meetings shall Council agenda who at matter h he that fact advise the cit which5:00 p,m, W dnesdn to place donhthepecified sub. y he wishes the desigh,ter to the Councildmee° later aenda ing ar my person who wishes d subject to be conaidereat or item that is on the to addres s form patcidal meetinge-mu ste aouncilosagthe endaouncil regard- toplle mretulet eA+. it The them CityeSecretquestrto regular speak particul for n g Th ar no longer tayor will call nary the before the an thre asy person whagenda o hasjtem is considers (3) Minutes cjtize onl Provided in this°t applied to by the Ctty coas that uncil only pon having obt paragraph maspeak °n an' agenda .its C l and will ained the y address t cil minutes beal sl cheduled for u no nanimous consee of Coun the agenda note completed or T gular longer tnt es$an three Paragraph do provisions on the publicg in res apply to Person cation. p°nse to n appear' of this (c) An an official at a notice blor public h person Who and ret urn it t must complete ° address hearing. O Cit a it quest hto Council at a for no lon The Mayor will secretary before thespeak~' form not d tothan fivag minutes thencitizenpp°ispeak address lie er (5) the speak provided Y perso unanimous consent O i the my Counciupon .11 this onbtainwho has (5) minutes °f l havied may the council. after all scheduled and willng be d the perso allowed five Persons have addressed ALL00275\210.2a Al~rrlda fit". ~~o----- ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION I OF ORDINANCE 90-150 PROVIDING RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE CITY COUNCIL OF DENTON, TEXASp' AMENDING PRESENTATIONS BY CITIZENS AND TIME LIMITS OF BUSINESS FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. Section I of Ordinanca No. 90-150 adopting Rules of Procedure of the City Council of Denton, Texas, is hereby amended by the amendment of paragraph 6.4 entitled "Presentation by Citizens" and paragraph 6 5 entitled "Time Limits" which shall hereafter be and read as follows: 6.4 Presentatl,)n by Citizens: (a) Any person who wishes to place a subject on the Council agenda at regular City Council meetings shall advise the City Manager's office of that fact and the specified subject matter which he desires to place on the agenda no later than 5:00 p.m. Wednesday prior to the council meeting at which he wishes the designated subject to be considered. (b) Any person who wishes to address the Council regard- ing an item that is an the Council's agenda for a regular or special meeting, must complete a "request to speak" form and return it to the City Secretary before the applicable meeting. The Mayor will call upon the citizen to speak for no longer than three (3) minutes as that particular agenda item is considered by the City council. Any person who has not applied to spea% on an agenda item as provided in this paragraph may address the Council only upon having obtained the unanimous consent of the Council and will be scheduled for no longer than three (3) minutes after all other regular business on the agenda has been completed. The provisions of this paragraph do not apply to person appearing at a public hearing in response to an official agenda notice or publication. (c) Any person who wishes to address the Council at a public hearing must complete a "request to speak" form and return it to the City Secretary before the applicable hearing. The Mayor will call upon the citizen to speak for no longer than five (5) minutes. Any person who has not applied to speak as provided in this paragraph may address the council only upon having obtained the unanimous consent of the council and will be allowed five (5) minutes after all scheduled persons have addressed the Council. w ARenda Ili;ro_ S - 5,5 Time Limits: Speakers before the Council arc re- quested to limit their remarks to five (5) minutes or less except for citizens speaking to a particular non- public hearing agenda item for which presentations shall be limited to three (3) minutes or less, That if any section, SECTION II subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or a thereof to of co petent any person or circumstances is held invalid b pan2cation of co t jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect y c°the Councilyof theeCity of Denton1OTexas this ordinance, and the city have enacted such remainin ~ hereby declaring g portions despite any such g inval alwould idity, CTToA-1111. Than this ordinance shall become effective imme- diately uon passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ~ 1992. BO$ CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY c_ BY., Page 2 Aqvmda 6.5 Time Limits; Speakers before the Council are re- quested to limit their remarks to five (5) minutes or less except for citizens speaking to a particular non- public hearing agenda item for which presentations shall be limited to three (3) minutes or less. SECTION II. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstances is hold invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declaring it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION Y U . That this ordinance shall become effective imme- diately upon its passage and approval. s PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY - BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY L , BY ; ~ ~,t,,La(t Page 2 -WWI CITY COUNCIL i M oo~°°~~n0 000 F °p00o .o Uo f noon ~ - 4 c. x p o r o ~ a ~F a O '~~~oO~roN se+Q`w- t °00accacconn°° f CITY CI COUNL AGENDA ITEM June 23, 1992 TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM; Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager RE: RECEIVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR CONSULTANT FOR 1992 ELECTRIC UTILITY RATE STUDY. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Public Utilities Board approve to the City Council the hiring of C. H. Guernsey to conduct the 1992 Electric Utility Rate Study for the City of Denton, This recommendation will be placed before the City Council at their meeting on June 23, 1992, SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: The 1992-93 Utility Department budget, as recommended by the staff and approved by the Public Utility Board, proposed an approximate 4.8% reduction in electric rates, In order to assure the Denton ratepayers of an equitable allocation of this rate reduction, it is necessary to conduct a review of the electric rates based on a "cost of service" study, Although staff recommended that an outside co reviews nsl,lting firm perform su h a study periodically to assure the Denton ratepayers that the rates meet all appropriate state of the art ratemaking principles and that such principles be compatible with neighboring utility systems. Therefore, on May 20, 1992, Requests for Proposals for this review were sent to the attached list of consultants. (Exhibit 1), We have received five responses to this RFP. (Exhibit II), 1, C.H. Guernse Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Guernsey is a well-known southwest regional engineering consulting firm, They do engineering and rate studies for municipals and co-ops throughout the Southwest. They performed the rate study for the City of Denton in 1988. The same people will be involved with the rate study that performed the previous rate study and, therefore, have a familiarity with our electric f system. The city of Bryan has also used C. H. Guernsey in the past for their rate studies. 2. A211 MRI, Mohnton, Pa. This is a small firm headed by Mr. At Herman who used to be the municipal electric management and rate consultant with Gilbert & Associates of Redding, Pa. Gilbert & Associates performed a management study for Denton Municipal Utilities in 1978- 79, a Power Supply Study in 1980 and an Electric Rate Study in 1983. Mr. Herman has done rate analysis and has provided rate modeling for the Texas Public Utilities Commission and has done rate studies in the past for Lower Colorado River Authority in Austin, Tx. 3. R.W. Beek & Associates, Denver, Colorado R. W. Beck is a nationally recognized consulting and engineering firm specializing in public power consulting work. They have offices in many cities across the United States where there are a concentration of public power systems. We have worked closely with R.W. Beck over the years with many TMPA feasibility and engineering studies. 4. RMI (Resource Managrement International), Austin, Texas. RMI is a major consulting engineering firm specializing in public power systems. Their headquarters are in Sacramento, California and they have offices in several cities where there are concentrations of public power systems. Their strengths lie in Management Studies, Performance Improvement Studies, Feasibility and rate studies for the electric and water utility industry. 5. Black & Veatch, Kansas City, Mo Black and Veatch has been our electric system design engineers for our power plant, the early development of our 69,000 volt transmission and substations systems, and the two hydroelectric generating units. They have also performed several mechanical system improvement studies for our power plant, plus they did the Waste to Energy Feasibility Study in 1988 for the SWAC study. Therefore they know Denton's physical electric system fairly well. FISCAL IMPACT Consultant Base Bid Additional Cost Total C. H. Guernse 18,600 1 100 19,700 A'H/MRI 16t400 3 350 (est) 19 760 R.W. Book 26_L500 None 26 500 RMI 128)200 000 2 900 211,900 Black & Veatch 5 000 33 200 lqpp~ .~M Rita j0/ AGENCIES AFFECTED: Citizens of Denton, Legal Department, Data Processingand Customer Service Departments, Denton Municipal Utilities Electric Department, Prepared/ Approved by: Respectfully submitted: • Howard Martin, Act g Executive Lloyd Harrell Director, Dept. of Utilities City Manager EXHIBITS: I. List of Consultants II, RFP III Ordinance IV. Contract V. Executive Summaries from Proposals ALL00284\1105.3A7 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENT014 AND C. H. GUERNSEY & COMPANY, RELATING TO CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN OF ELECTRIC RATES; AUTHO- RIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENT014 HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the city manager is authorized to execute the attached agreement iaetween the City of Denton and C. H. Guernsey & Company relating to consulting services for the design of electric rates. SECTION I . That the City Council hereby authorizes the ex- penditure of funds as set forth in the agreement. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective im- mediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: _ c:wpsllcatvacl /V CONSULTING SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN TEE CITY OF DENTON AND C.H. GUERNSEY & COMPANY This Agreement is made between the CITY OF DENTON (City), a municipal corporation located in Denton County, Texas, and C.li. GUERNSEY & COMPANY, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, (Consultant) as follows: T. CONSULTANT'S SERVICES A. Consultant shall provide the following services to City: 1. Project electric revenue requirements, using the proposed 1993 budget as the base-year, and estimate revenues required from all revenue sources over the following three year period. 2. Develop a cost of service study using one or more accepted allocation techniques to estimate costs to serve each customer rate class. 3. Develop fair and equitable rate structure(s) which produce sufficient revenues to meet the City's current and future needs and which will recover proportionately and equitably the costs of services from each customer class. 4. if requested, present f'sidingfj to the Public Utilities Board or the Cfty Council. B. The Consultant's services will be prrovidand incorporated accordance with the scope of work attached as Attachment Contract by reference. C. The Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care, skill and diligence the performance onal services as is under similar ordinarily circumY provided by y a pr•ofess stances. TI. COMPENSATION TO BE PAID CONSULTANT A. The City agrees to pay the Consultant for the services performed at the hourly rates set forth in Attachment e, but the Consultant shall not be paid more than $19,700 for all services required to be provided under this Agreement regardless of the number of hours required to provide those services. The consultant shall bill the City once a month for the hours worked to the date of billing and the City shall pay each billing within thirty days of receipt of an undisputed bill. Ten per cent of the total bill for services performed will be withheld until all requirements of this contract are met by the Consultant. III. TERM OF AGREEMENT This Agreement shall begin on the date of execution and shall continue until all services have been performed and payments made. IV. CONSULTANT IS INDEPENDEN'T' CONTRACTOR The Consultant is an independent contractor and shall not be deemed to be or considered an employee of the City for the purposes of income tax, withholding, social security taxes, vacation or sick leave benefits, workers' compensation, or any other City employee benefit. Consultant shall perform the services to the satisfaction of the City Manager or his designee. V. INDEMNIFICATION The Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever, by reason of injury to property or third persons to the extent directly and proximately caused by the error, omission or negligent act of the Consultant, its officers, agents, employees, and invitees in the performance of this Agreement, and the Consultant will, at its cost and expense, defend and protect the City against any and all. such claims and demands. VI. CHOICE OF LAW AND VENUE This Agreement uhall be governed by law of the State of Texas, and venue for its construction and enforcement shall lie in the courts of Denton County, Texas. PAGE. 2 konjidii No VII, CANCELLATION City reserves the right to cancel this contract at any time upon fourteen (14) days prior notice, but Consultant shall be paid for all services provided up to the date of cancellation. VIII. NOTICES All notices, communications and reports required or permitted under this contract shall be personally delivered or mailed to the respective parties by depositing same in the U.S. mail, certified, return receipt requested, at the addresses shown below, unless and until either party is otherwise notified in writing by the other party at the following addresses. All notices shall be deemed delivered as of the date of the receipt. If intended for City, to: If intended for Consultant, to: City of Denton C.H. Guernsey & Company Lloyd V. Harrell, City Mgr Suhas PI Patwardhan, Vice Pres, 215 E. McKinney 3555 Northwest 58th Street y' Denton, TX 76201 Oklahoma City, OK 73112 EXECUTED this the day of 1992„ CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: _ LLOYD V, HARRELL, CITY MANAGER ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: PAGE 3 Wto zr y .5 ~ n4dfy1 i C.R. Guernsey & Company, CONSULTANT By; Suhas P. Patwardhan Vice President Director, Energy Division i i PAGE 4 ATTACMCMgT A SCOPE OF WORK 1. Financial Analysis The Consultant shall review the electric utility's historical and future revenue requirements and expenses. The Study shall anticipate costs and revenue requirements and develop rates to be applied for the next 3 fiscal years. Projected future capital and operating expenditures will be provided by the Utility Staff, but shall be reviewed and analyzed by the Consultant. • The rates shall. be designed to provide revenue such that bond rate covenants are met. Bond covenants require that pledged revenues be 1.25 times average debt service requirements, However, revenues shall also be such that net income is sufficient to allow an annual transfer from the Electric Fund to the General Fund equal to six percent (6k) of net investment. 2. Rate Design Structure The Consultant shall evaluate the cost associated with serving all the various identifiable classes of customers, Rates shall be designed to recover such associated customer class costs as much as possible, however, recognizing such rate making principals as moderating any &i9nificant change, of historical rates. Customer classes shall be of similar description to current rate-making practices of area utilities and the Texas Public Utility Commission, to the extent that such classes are applicable to the City of Denton's electrical system. Rate structure design shall consider the following areas of concern to the utility; a. Cost of Service The rates charged for providing electrical service to each class of electric customers, to the maximum extent practicable, should reflect the costs of providing electrical service to such class. b. Demand Charge Customers PAGE 5 The Consultant shall review for appropriateness the minimum primary service requirements of 750 KW for the General Service Primary KW exclusion for ( the Genera Large Service r Commercial (GS)trate. c. Seasonally Adjusted Rates The Consultant shall review and consider rates charged for providing electric service to each class of electric consumer on a seasonal basis which reflects the costs of providing servic seasons of the the ye y seasonally for the electric system. d. Load Management Techniques The t shall review techniquesand make recommendations s for aimprovement. e, Demand Ratchet The Consultant shall review and consider the system demand related costs and the existing summer peak demand ratchets and determine whether the ratchets adequately track customer class costs. Such analysis will by custom rd class. ion of he ratchet include changes in the application F. General Service The Consultant shall review and consider the effect of the existing rate structure on General Service ust oners twho heir have a relatively large energy usage in proport to demand, A service rate class. separate large ratdesign e g, Local Government Rate The Consultant shall review and consider the rate for local government service to determine whether the existing rate is recovering icoots of in providing electrical service to the the rate class. h. The Consultant shall consider other utilities' rate structures for the purpose of designing City of Denton rates that are highly competitive. 3. Rate Making Standards PAGE 6 . Agondii No. The Consultant shall address the number of rate classes that currently exist and the feasibility of reducing the number of classes currently established sdWasdrate schedules, or where appropriate, 4. Reporting Requirements a. Schedule Preliminary review and development of revenue and expense projections shall be completed by August 1, 1992. A draft final report shall be due within 7 days of approval of draft report. A final report shall be delivered by August 24, 1992. The final report shall include: 0 An Executive Summary of key points and recommendations. 0 Supporting exhibits, schedules, figures, and work papers. 0 A discussion of the assumptions and principal considerations. 0 A review of the study methods. 0 An explanation of the data requirements and sources. 0 A listing of conclusions and recommendations. h. The Consultant shall provide the City of Denton with twenty-five (25) copies Of the final Utility Rate Study report. After delivery of the final report, the consultant shall present the report to the Public tTtility Board or City Council, as designated by the Executive Director of Utilities. PAGE 7 LIST --F C:ONSLTI,TANTS 1 C• Imo. GUERNSEY & COMPANX 3555 W. W. 58th Strut (Oklahoma City, C)K 73112 2. A2H ENERGY SERVICES PO Box 201 101 Nortlx Fifth Stro©t Suito 301 Rora.dirxg, PA 196703-0201 3. It. W. B I:CK AW17 ASSOCIAZ"FS L7r~nver NatiorlExl 13arllc guild3rl suite 1900 1125 Sevantaontlx St. I7o.xvor, CO 80202-2615 4. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT INTL. INC . (I2.MI) 8310 Capital of '.PoXaEi Highway North, Szxito 385 Austiri, TX 78731-1026 5 • I'SI.ACK & VEA~rCH 8400 Ward Yarlkway YO Box 8405 Kaxxsa~s City, MC> 541:14 ti Apondallom_~S_ CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF ELECTRIC RATE CONSULT3ANT r 3 'y9J dune .1992 1 Does consultant s response address the scope of work contained in the Request for Proposal (RFP)? (See attached comparison) C.H. Guernsey - Yes A2H/MRI - Yes, proposes use of system marginal costs. Also refers to proprietary computer model. R.W. Beck - Yes, very specific to RFP itemo, RMI Yes, addresses specific RFP items. Black & Veatch - Yes, proposes use of Average and Excess Demand method. 2. Does consultant's response state that time schedule outlined in RFP can be met? Guernsey - yes MRI - Yes Beck - Yes RMI - Yes, but schedule indicates a meeting to discuss data w wee p after contract approval Black & Veatch - Yes for final product on Aug 24, but doesn't address draft by Aug 1 3. How many hours does consultant state project will require? Guernsey - 250 hours MRI " 200 hours Beck - 350 hours RMI 275 hours Black & Veatch 350 hours 4. Does consultant's response include a not-to--exceed cost for all services provided? Guernsey - yes MRI Yes for professional services, but at cost for other expenses Beck - Yes for professional services, but unclear about out of pocket expenses/computer use/reproduction Acpida Ifam hqe -_l 4. (Continued) RMI - Yes Black & Veatch Yes a. What is total cost? Study Effort Expenses Total Guernsey $18,600 $1,100 $19,700 A2H/MRI 16,400 3,350 * 19,750 Beck 26,500 included 26,500 RMI 26,000 2,900 28,900 B & V 28,200 5,000 33,200 * Estimate only - not firm b, what is cost per hour for professional services? + Guernsey - $74.40 MRI - 82.00 Beck 75.70 (not broken out of total expenses) RMI - 94.55 B & V 80.57 c. What is cost per hour based on total expenses? Guernsey - $78.60 MRI - 98.75 Beck - 75.70 RMI - 105.09 B V - 94.86 5. Does consultant address other costs that would be charged to City outside of scope of work? Guernsey - States taxes imposed on services extra Services outside scope at hourly rate late payment of bill interest (45 days) MRI Use of personal car above stated estimate Expert testimony Beck Charge for extra trips (three in proposal) Possible extra charge for computer use and reproduction expenses RMI Could be extra charge if schedule slips due to lack of (timely) data availability B & V Interest charge of bill paid after 30 days Expert testimony 61 Does consultant's response state that reporting requirements can be met? V-8 - 6. (continued) [kite 4- r ;0 Guernsey - /.5 d,/ 5I MRI Yes Beck - Yes RMI _ Yes B & V - Yes 7• Yes, but stated schedule questionable Does consultant's response provide evidence of e a experience to adequately complete rate study? xp-rtise and Guernsey - Yes MRI _ - Denton study in 1,989 Beck - Yes - Denton study in 1983 Yes No Denton, but Greenville RMI 1992 study in Yes B & V - No Denton, but Greenville in ' Yes - Denton work sometime in past past 8• Are there any specific differences in lowest two bidders in terms of the a the proposals of the or quality of the completed rate xpected cast, timeliness, study? Guernsey - -Provides true not to-exceed including professional services and other -Close proximity to Denton allows for more timely, lees expensive meetings as required -Conducted Electric rate study in 1989 _ has good knowledge of Denton utility and rate structure plus historical data (if maintained) -Low bidder (by only $50 but firm) MRI - -Does not provide not-to-exceed price - expenses may exceed estimates -Price is Only $50 above low bidder (but not firm) -,Estimate for travel seems low - any additional trips required will drive costs up significantly beyond lowest bidder -Will gain valuable knowledge of Denton system through current TMPA contract -Other experience with Denton dated 112SPOMSE TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL IcIr (Did tw> lowest bidders address specific RFP requirements) RFP ITEM A2fi G_IJER_ NSE_y I•. Financial Analysis 3 year projection (93-95) Yes Yes Bond Covenants Yes Yes General Fund Transfers Yes Yes 2. Rate Design w Costs per Customer Class Yes Yes Recover Costs per Class Yes Yes Rate Making per pUC No Comment yeu 3. Areas of Concern Cost of Service Yes Yes Demand Charge Customers Yes Yes Seasonably Adjusted Rates Yes Yes Load Management Yes Xe:; Demand Ratchets eute.a ° 1` e s Yes General Service Yea Not Specific Local Gov Rate Yes Yea Competitive Rates Yes Yes 4. Rate Making Standards Number of. Rate Classes Required Yes Yea REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL STUDY OF ELECTRIC UTILITY RATES CITY' OF DENTON You are invited to submit a LQ2gga1 for an Electric_Rate Study for the Department of Utilities of the City of Denton. I. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The purpose of the study is to conduct a utility rate study to assure that all present rates correctly reflect present cost of service for all customer 'Lasses. II. SCOPE OF WORK: A. Electric Rate Study 1. Financial Analysis The Consultant shall review the electric utility's historical and future revenue requirements and expenses. The Study shall anticipate costs and revenue requirements and develop rates to be applied for the next 3 fiscal years. Projected future capital and operating expenditures will be provided by the Utility Staff, but shall be reviewed and analyzed by the Consultant. The rates shall be designed to provide revenue such that bond rate covenants are met. Bond covenants require that pledged revenues be 1.25 times average debt service requirement-n. However, revenues shall also be such that net income is sufficient to allow an annual transfer from the Electric Fund to the General Fund equal to six percent {0) of net investment. 2. Rate Design Structure The Consultant shall evaluate the cost associated with serving all the various identifiable classes of customers. Rates shall be designed to recover such associated customer class costs as much as possible, however, recognizing such rate making principals as moderating any gignificant chances of historical rates. w Page 2 Request for Proposal Customer classes shall be of similar description to current rate-making practices of area utilities and the Texas Public utility Commission, to the extent that such classes are applicable to the City of Denton's electrical system. Rate structure design shall consider the following areas of cg corn to the utility: a. Cost of Service The rates charged for providing electrical service to each class of electric customers, to the maximum extent practicable, should reflect the costs of providing electrical service to such class. b. Demand Charge Customers The Consultant shall review for appropriateness the minimum primary service requirements of 750 KW for the GP and LP rate and the 20 KW exclusion for the GS rate. C. Seasonally Adjusted Rates The Consultant shall review and consider rates charged for providing electric service to each class of electric consumer on a seasonal basis which reflects the costs of providing service to such class of consumers at different seasons of the year to the extent that such costs vary seasonally for the electric system. d. Load Management Techniques The Consultant shall review Denton's load management techniques and make recommendations for improvement. e. Demand Ratchet The Consultant shall review and consider the system demand related costs and the existing summer peak demand ratchets and determine whether the ratchets adequately track customer class costs. Such analysis would include recommended changes in the application of the ratchet by customer class. Npod'i NO ee, Page 3 Request Eor Proposal f. General Service The Consultant shall review and consider the effect of the existing rate structure on General Service customers who have a relatively large energy usage in proportion to their demand. A rate design should consider establishing a separate large general service rate class. , g. Local Government Rate The Consul ant shall review and consider the d rate for local government service to determine whether the existing rate is recovering costs of providing electrical service to the customers included in the rate class. h. The Consultant shall consider other utilities' rate structures for the purpose of designing City of Denton rates that are highly competik~live. 3. Rate Making Standards The Consultant should address the number of rate classes that currently exist and the feasibility of reducing the number of classes currently established as rate schedules, III, GENERAL INFORMATION A. Description of Denton's Operating System The City of Denton owns and operates its electrical system which primarily serves the population of 66,000 within the corporate city limits of Denton, Denton is located 20 mills north of the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, and thirty-five (35) miles from either Dallas or Fort Worth, Due to the close proximity of Denton to these dynamic metropolitan areas and transportation centers, Denton has experienced commercial and residential growth. Page 4~ Request for Proposal H. Available Docum n ~ A COPY of Denton's proposed 1992-1993 operating budget and 1993-1997 Capital Improvements Plan summary documents are enclosed for reference. in addition, the current rate schedules are enclosed. Copies of the complete departmental operating budget, capital improvement plan, and both staff and long-range forecasts are available. The Utility Department has also performed rate studies in-house and the full rate study reports are available for inspection, C. Electrical Rertuiremanta Retail electrical sales in fiscal year 1991 were 779,626,000 KWH. Electrical system power and energy requirements are projected to change at a rate of 2.90W, 2.49W, 2.191, 2.59$ and 3$ over the next five years with a 48V load factor. Current peak electrical demand is 180,000 KW with an estimated 1.3V growth. Current generating capability is 183,000 KW. There are approximately 327 miles of electric lines. Average residential rate per KWH is 7.6 cents. Average residential KWH per month is 926. D. S'ustomer Mix Denton has a total of 26,900 electric customers, and approximately 88* are residential, 11.7$ are commercial and industrial, and 1.9k other. The University of North Texas and Texas Woman's University represent approximately 8.5% and 3.5V respectively of the peak demand requirements of the system. E. Ur_ility and tzyr S aAf The Utility Department, including Electric, Water, Wastewater and Community Services, is under the direction of the Executive Director of Utilities. The Electric Department Director is responsible for the day-to-day operation, maintenance, design, and construction of the Electric Production Division, the Electric Distribution Division, and the Electric Substations and Metering Division. The Water and Wastewater Divisions are responsible for the day-to-day operation, maintenance, design, and construction of the Water production Division, the Wastewater Treatment Plant, the Municipal Laboratory, and tht Water and Wastewater Field Services Division. Community Services responsibilities include Solid Waste, Fleet Services and Drr,inage Operations. Page 5 Request for Proposal ive Director of Utilities reports to the City The Execut Manager, who is responsible to the city Council. The Utility Department purchases the services of several support groups. The Finance Department, under provides direction of the Executive Director of Finance, p the most support services through their Finance and Customer Service Divisions. The Customer Service Division is responsible for the accurate and timely billing and collection of individual customer accounts. Data Department sunder is direction of the Fina ace lDeparment. R F. ^_eration and Power S )Div The City of Denton has a 183 MW steam generating plant located within the city and is aparticipantCin a 400 MW lignite steam g g plant Power a owned b the nd type of additionalnfuture capacity additions has not yet been determined. IV. REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT A. ~~r~ ~ncil The Denton City Council, composed of a Mayor and six roes rand with the authority to Cou set ncil B p l s r {l it_v rr~ The Public Utility Board is a five member board appointed by the Council with the City Manager and Executive Director of Utilities serving as ex officio members. This Board serves as a consulting, supervisory body. The Board is charged by charter tow cttt in an advisory capacity to the City Council, authority to hold public hearings and to study iaand recommend policies relating to the operation, p enlargement, future planning and such other matters as may be referred to it by the City Council. All rates the charges for utility services mine be Council whasb final Board on a periodic jurisdiction on approval of utility rates. C. Public Ut lity Commission The City of f PuDenton is blic Utility subect to Commissin he injurisdiction e the Texas setting matters. ~r T ~i1~11da Nn. Ago.++ld Rant. S - to , Page 6 Request for Proposal V. QUALIFICATIONS A. The Consultant shall pcovide in the and comprehensive description of the proposal a complete shall list the qualificatine and background of thepfirm in the field of electric rate studies, proposal peshallrsonnel list to the asPro The ject Manager and staff support respective resumes, signed to the project along with their The he name oral shall telephone vide a list of clients, including Ph umber of all references, VI, EXPERT TESTIMONY The Consultant shall anticipate that personnel involved an/or responsible for the development of the electric rates at a later time, required to give expert testimony. Professional service additionfeestherfsuchftest eonys all be considered to be in listed separately as designated inysecti nt VII (B) sof lthis request for proposal, VII, REPORTING A, sc~ Selection of the consultant and authorization to commence work is anticipated to be completed by July 1, 1992. Preliminary review and development of revenue and expense projections shall be completed by August 10 1992 A draft final report shall be due within 7 days of approval of draft report, A final report shall be delivered by August 240 1992. B. Qrea _nr-~~i~ o Final _R M= r The Consultant shall provide the City of Denton with tXQntv- Jy0 (25) copies of the report. After delive final Utility Rate Study consultant shall r' of the final report, the of the Cit present the report to a joint meeting y Council and Public Utility Board. rtii)Cgda ltum_-/G S-' gip, y Page 7 Wto 'off 3 Z Request for Proposal VIII, PROPOSAL " A. F9rmat Each candidate shall provide proposal Outlining the three {3) copies of their subject rates o0nsultant 's understandin methodolo study, detailing the 9 of the two parts that will be used. The approach and proposal shall be in 1 The Utility Rate consultant Study proposal, addressin g and ,s understanding of the scope of the qualifi ncl dne g the firm' S work; and client reference F li and t, 2. The consultant's list. fees, price schedule detailing all B. Tal osr The Consultant shall submit general terms and conditions for s Proposal stating hourly rates of various ervices g the involved in the categories of Plus standard requirements shall beuli* An estimateergonnel to be cost for the stud sted. A t.ota.l Of manpower. y shall be submi:ted. "not to exceed" C. ~eleEtion of n roeoaa a Due to the nature of Lhe study, proposal submitted y, the technical consideration in will be the Fortson of therefore awarding the moat important not be a C' be complete and s ec' contract and should, ontrolling factor in the fic. evaluation cost ma will be considered in t the evaluation process, The Cit he negotiation and ProCe it value y of Denton will award of f the Proposal analysis which will perform an overall best. cost analysis consider the technical requirements as and ability to perform the Denton reserves hs p ied' In addition resolicit i ght to reject all the city of , respon.aible in the event that no proposals and to provide proposals are received and adequate mutually satisfactory results. . Pr~enQa Rem ~.5.,-,_ June 8, 1992 tlERNSE T r Mr. R. E. Nelson, P.E. Executive Director of Utilities City of Denton 215 East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Bob; SUBJECT: Proposal for Study of Electric Utility Rates Thank you for allowing C. H. Guernsey & Company to once again prepare a proposal to the Utility Department, City of Denton, Texas for an electric rate study and cost of service. Our proposal includes the following: Section I Scope of Work Section Il Listing of Analytical Services Professional Staff and Resumes Section III Partial Client List of Analytical Services Group indicat- ing our previous experience related to similar projects Section IV Corporate Overview and Information Section V Engineering Service Contract/Cost Proposal l would like to point out certain important points to be considered during the development of this study and in your selection of the consultant to provide these services. • C. H. Guernsey & Company has developed the rate tariffs currently in use by the City of Denton. The time-of-use and standby rates were developed in 1989. In 1990, C. H. Guernsey & Company updated these tariffs as well as the base rates. • C. H. Guernsey & Company is quite familiar with the wholesale power supply arrangements of the City with the Texas Municipal Power Authority (TMPA), Our Involvement with other Texas municipal systems as well as numerous ongoing jobs in the state of Texas allows us a unique insight Into power supply in the state, • The City of Denton has purchased and previously used the PC-based cost of service software developed by C. H. Guernsey & Company. Selection of C. H. Guernsey & Company would mean that all work could be replicated on the City's cnmputers and that "what if" studies and updates can be prepared by City persontiA during and after the completion of the study. This type of T Agenda NIr. R. E. Nelson, P.E. a 5! Jr Page 2 June 8, 1992 I activity would result in speedy and specific responses to the needs and concerns expressed by your staff, utility board members, and city council members on a real-time basis. • C. H. Guernsey & Company's experience in developing financial forecasts used in conjunction with bond prospectus statements provide us with the ability to integrate the City's financial forecast for the next three fiscal years as well as the future capital and operating expenditures developed by the utility staff Into a cohesive rate structure. I Our significant work history with municipal electric systems provides us with the ability to provide insight into the give and take required to reflect cost of service requirements with customer impact, historical continuity, value of service and customer acceptability standards. These criteria will be developed based upon input from City personnel as well as the current ratemaking procedure espoused by the Texas Public Utility Commission, I • The location of C. H. Guernsey & Company in Oklahoma City allows our personnel to respond to all City requests in a timely manner. During the previous studies, C. H. Guernsey personnel were able to meet with City staff members as early as 8:00 In the morning. Travel expense from Oklahoma City are minimal based on the proximity and the adequate transportation between the two locations. ' • One of the critical aspects of the study would be. to ensure that the proposed rate design of Denton can compete on a level playing Field with the retail rates charged by Texas Utilities. Because of our previous working relationship with Denton, and more importantly because of our ongoing Involvement with Texas Utilities retail /wholesale rates, we have a unique insight into the ratemaking at Texas Utilities and Denton. We would, therefore, be able to develop competitive f rates using our existing knowledge of both utilities. • We would propose to use the same project team that has successfully completed your last rate design proposals. The team would include Jeff Hoppe and Suhas Patwardhan, they have intimate knowledge of your rate-setting process, your cost of service philosophy and the availability of data. The project team is already well-versed in the Denton operations and, having previously presented rate study findings to the utility board and city council, is in a favorable position to address your requirements during this study, • Guernsey is proud of its long-term involvement in the utility ratemaking arena In the state of Texas, We believe that we have provided more regulatory assistance and regulatory testimony before the Texas PUC than any other consulting firm. We are intimately familiar with the ratemaking standards of the Texas PUC. We, therefore, would be able to brh b in ;,11 the relevant ratemaking and cost of service standards and issues In the preparation of L, - ,n's rate study. This would assure the citizens and ratepayers that the rate design and pricing policy is predicated upo,t acceptable regulatory standards and the citizens are not losing the protection of an independent PUC because of tho internal Zontrol on the rates by the City of Denton utility board and city council. ~~ri+trJa PJo l(8 bfr, R, A9c+i~a ttum, !~S E. Nelson, P, E, Page 3 r,- - June 8, 1992 We have the ability to redundant meet the time schedule set manpower requirements forth in the Request for Proposal. we can respond as quickly Generally di find that a cost of service and rate design study can be completed within the o ecm°nsen tof our frame as indicated from Jal l as you want In completing your study, 1992 to in bringing its rates in line with cost of erv August of the areas Historically, City has taken si and other acceptable ime that need to be evaluated in this study include., 1 pratemaktn related costs through the demand or ever c g gnificonsiderations,cant strides Some rate design; energy component, thereby resultingd in cost•based on discriminatory Le. di of capacity- gn' and existing seasonal cost differentials. T710 study should also develop recommend consolidating the exi rates into a more manageable number of rates ations on , O the rate design is the anal P ysis Texas Utilities, Inc. n will be pre m competitive position faced by Denton v1 t the critical aspects of chal-ged p ed to deliver the final report on the August 24! 1992 time ameY asea upon July 1, W1992 e start date. We propose to perform a not-to-exceed fee of the $I9 study of your electric 700 utility rates consistent with performed for Ns tee is lower th an the t~e Your statement of work for or the you In 19 a Because of our extensive knowled f e of Youreraters t*n offer to do the study for a lower price in 1992, full rate study that we three years p evious , Section V of our proposal shows a standard ngtneincreases in our cults overothe we c executed between Guernsey and Denton earlier , This section also provides the standardihourl 10 the one the Categories of Personnel and the r p ejected manpower requirements for the study. Y rates for We are proud of our rate consulting work for oth of referer;,~es, We urge you er to call these references tPublic provided power clients, them, attached to this letter is a list ascertain the qualify of work and services we have We hope that evaluation of our extensive experience, our on oin similar services to Denton in the past, availability of the s :meg o ec= torical relationshi in r our extensive knowledge of the regulatory pr J earn to assist you in th rCtg a in espoused by the Texas PUC, and our competitive pr cetawot oi d r convince including is project, should be the successful contractor et perform this rate study for ou t the regulatory policies to a favorable reply and an y that C. H. Guernsey & opportunity to begin working un ti,is proect on an We are looking forward expeditious basis. Sincerely, C, H. GUERNSEY & COMPANY Sub,u-p,-l'att~ar~Iian; P Vice President Director, Energy Dlr,islon SPP/csh Enclosures r •w~ nt;trnrJa ~ln 9~~- ~~8 Pttcnrl,~ll^rn,,,_li?S'_ Mr. R. E. Nelson, P.E. Page 3 l/ June 8, 1992 We have the ability to meet the time schedule set forth in the Request for Proposal, Because of our redundant manpower requirements we can respond as quickly as you want in completing your study. Generally we find that a cost of service and rate design study can be completed within the one-month time frame as indicated from July 1, 1992 to August 1, 1992, Historically, City has taken significant strides in bringing its rates in line with cost of service and other acceptable ratemaking considerations. Some of the areas that need to be evaluated in this study include: (1) demand tilt, i.e„ recovery of capacity- related costs through the demand or energy component, thereby resulting in cost-based non-discriminatory rate design; and (2) seasonal cost differentials. The study should also develop recommendations on consolidating the existing rates into a more manageable number of rates. One of the critical aspects of the rate design is the analysis of the real competitive position faced by Denton via -via rates charged by Texas Utilities, Inc. We will be prepared to deliver the final report on the August 24, 1992 time frame, based upon a July 1, 1992 start date. We propose to perform the study of your electric utility rates consistent with your statement of work for a not-to-exceed fee of $19,700. This fee is lower than the fee for the previous full rate study that we performed for you in 1989. Because of our extensive knowledge of your ratemaking process, we can offer to do the study for a lower price in 1992, even with the increases in our costs over the previous three years. Section V of our proposal shows a standard engineering service contract similar to the one executed between Guernsey and Denton earlier. This section also provides the standard hourly rates for the categories of personnel and the projected manpower requirements for the study. We are proud of our rate consulting work for other public power clients. Attached to this letter is a list of references. We urge you to call these references to ascertain the qualify of work and services we have provided them. We hope that evaluation of our extensive experience, our ongoing historical relationship in providing similar services to Denton in the past, availability of the same project team to assist you in this project, our extensive knowledge of the regulatory arena in the state of Texas, including the regulatory policies espoused by the Texas PUC, and our competitive price, would convince you that C. H. Guernsey & Company should be the successful contractor to perform this rate study for you. We. are looking forward to a favorable reply and an opportunity to begin working on this project on an expeditious basis. Sincerely, C. H. GUERNSEY & COMPANY Syhas-P-Patw~rdt-ian, ]sE` Vice President Director, Energy Division SPP/csh Enclosures 40flild No. A9010llwm__/~_ ESTIMATED COST 1 Hours S/UM Amount Principal s0 100 $ 81000 Senior Consultant 100 75 7,500 Analyst 50 50 2,500 " Clerical 20 30 Total Labor $18,600 Travel 400 Reprographics 600 Phone/Postage Total Cost $19,700 lu~nnda N0. Age310a flem__ S _~O f~• V. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE FEES PrincipalM $100 per hour Senior Consultants) $75 per hour Analyst $50 per hour Clerical $30 per hour M u' Mr. Patwardban, Mr. Stover rn Mr. Hoppe, Ms. Lambert `t *,~:aar,:; 1 A{)mirfa No. f.2 ~ ~ Slanaaefaer~(1~:ntlt1 IIRn1 ~S Rosources / lnfemalronai ti.IIR _..__W__, June 8, 1992 Mr. Robert E, Nelson, P,E, Executive Director of Utilities 215 E, McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Re_ Cost Proposal for an Eiectri Rate Study Dear Mr. Nelson: At your request, this proposal is being submitted in two sections. The first, entitled Technical Proposal, and this Cost Proposal for the work described in the Technical Proposal. COST ESTIMATE Rased on our evaluation of the work required to successfully complete the proposed study, we estimate the cost will total $19,750 including $16,400 for professional services and $3,350 for project out-of-pocket expenses. For this effort, A2H/MRI will agree to a "not-to-exceed" amount of $16,=100 for the professional services. We have made our best estimate on the expense portion of the total cost listed in detail below. However, with the ever changing airfare situation, and other factors which are beyond the control of the consultants, we feet that expenses should be on an "at cost" basis. Certainly A2H/MRI will do everything possible to keep our expenses within the amount estimated. As an example, the airfare listed is the lowest cost, seven day excursion fare, currently provided by the carriers. DETAILED PRICE SCHEDULE Professional Services For the professional services associated with the study, the following details are provided in regards to standard hourly rates and staffing requirements, Billing nofeonal Rate Hours Albert A, Herm.m $90 80 Patrick S. Hurley $90 80 Beverly A, Timmer $50 40 Total i%i-rrrLl If?Ql,_ Robert E. Nelson, P.E. t~.uo Page _2_. Denton, 'T'exas June 8, 1992 1Sjlnated ExNn§91,. In addition to the cost of professional services, certain other expenses consisting of, but not limited to, travel and living expenses of A'H/MRI employees when engaged on a project away from the home office, and long distance telephone and telegraph charges, printing, reproduction and data processing charges will be billed at cost. If our employees use their own cars to make a trip in your interest, you will be billed at 28 cents per mile. Rented automobiles will be billed at cost, 1. Air fare - Five Round Trips, Reading, PA - Dallas, TX @ $320 per trip $1,600 2. Car Rental - Two Trips, Airport - Denton 250 3. Hotel - Fifteen nights @ $60/night 900 4. Meals - Fifteen days @ $30/day 450 5. Telephone, Copying, Etc . . . 150 Total . 53.350 Summary Estimate Professional Services . $16,400 (Not-to-exceed amount) Estimated Expenses . J ,.35Q (At Cost) 'T'otal 19 750 TERMS AND CONDITIONS AZH/MRI will submit combined invoices, administrated by MRI, rendered monthly for the preceding month's services performed and expenses incurred on your behalf up to the not-to-exceed limit. Invoices will be due and payable thirty days after receipt. Our assignment may be interrupted or terminated at any time without further liability other than for the c ,arges and expenses incurred up to the date of such interruption or termination. EXPERT TFSTINIONY The fees for any testimony prepared in conjunction with this electric rate study are considered to be in addition to the fees associated with the study itself. The hourly rate for testimony for bc'I Mr. Herman and Mr. Hurley is $90,00 per hour. Any expenses associated with the preparation and submittal of testimony are likewise considered outside the Scope of Services for the conduct of the Rate Study. All additional expenses for testimony will be billed at cost to the City of Denton. MANAGEMENT RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL A1~3ndu Nn, _ _ Ja D/~ Robert E. Nelson, P.E. n +da Irani e S - 5! Denton, Texas ttlln 6-3 - y2~ - -page---3-- June S, 1992 APPROVAL .cam ~tr5_, the City, This Proposal will serve as our agreement when executed by an authorized representapive of and return two opies~o~he e represer lttaivesthlisted e ityY of Denton, please Sign at the app . ropriate space Sincerely, MANAGEMENT RESOURCES 1 NTERNAT1oNAL ASH energy services Patrick S. Hurley Vice President A. A, Herman, Jr. Principal Mara emen PSH/sjm 8 onsultant AGREED AND ACCEPTED City of Denton, Texas By~_ Title Date MANAGEMENT RESOURCES INTERNA-r1ONAL f~ h page 3 Robert I's. Nelson, I',E• June S, 1992 Denton, 'T'exas/ < G' APPROVAL This Proposal will serve as our agreement when executed by an authorized representative of the City. If it is found to be acceptable to the City of Denton, please sign at the appropriate space and return two copies to the representatives !istcd below. Sincerely, 'r MANAOBMENT RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL A'll energy servlCes / ant y A. A`, Herman, Jr. I.J Vice Pa tri clr S. Hurley President urley Principal Mianagement~-f.on,.ultant PSH/sim s' AGREED AND ACCEPTED i City of Denton, Texas i Title Date - MANAUFAIENT RESOURCES [,N j j.RNA'I IONAI, r RErFIV!zn , o I992 a R.W. BECK ~mlld'1 AND ASSOCIATES Arlcaua Ilem S_~ w , Seventeenth Stra r•t ■ I kn r r I~t ~'a✓..1 fu Dn - mer Na tiun nl Hank Building. Suite 1900 tz1121 e, C,dunel,, )?.,riT I 1-'S A( Tulephonc f 1011 294.1!00 ■ P,~u 11011 24i ~l81 I CD-0000-BG-AA June 9, 1992 Mr, Robert E. Nelson Executive Director of Utilities City of Denton 215 E. McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Mr, Nelson: Enclosed are 3 copies of our response to your request for proposal for an Electric Rate Study, On behalf of R, W. Beck and Associates it is our sincere pleasure to submit this proposal to the City of Denton to provide consulting services in connection with this rate study. We believe our Firm is uniquely qualified to provide the services you require on a timely basis, Some of the benefits our Firm and Project Team have to offer include: • A Project Manager who has conducted numerous rate studies for municipal utilities in Texas; • A team of rate analysts who have presented expert testimony before numerous state commissions, including the Texas Public Utilities Commission; • Mr. Ed Cecil, a member of the Project Team, is co-author of APPA's Rate Manual; • A, diverse Project Team which will be dedicated to this project; and 0 A nationally recognized Firm in the areas of rates and litigation. Our proposal is divided into five sections for your review: Section Title 1 Scope Of Work 2 Project Personnel 3 Statement Of Qualifications 4 Finn Brochure 5 Compensation and Schedule Section 5 is attached separately, Km mAIA■Cnlumbu,, NE D Dmmcr.CO ■ InJi.,nerolia IN I Ann,-,pd,,%IN Nnhvilrn TN MQIhnJo, FI. ■ Phernie, AZ m Cueeimente. CA • Searle, WA Njolvia Plo. Mr. Robert E, Nelson I)i!n 3 _,199 -2' June 12 3 J .c [ We invite you to contact the references we have included in our proposal (see Section 3, under "Project Profiles") to gain a better understanding of our capabilities. Please contact me directly at (512) 349-2254 if you have any questions, We appreciate the invitation to submit this proposal and look forward to working with the City of Denton. Sincerely, R. IN. BECK AND ASSOCIATES A Todd W, F! nger, P.E. Principal Engineer Approved: Edward A. Cecil Partner TWF:th (275701) Enclosure ncr,r.• ,0 AYSMATFs Section COMPENSATION AND SCHEDULE NOT-TO-EXCEED COST ESTIMATE Based on our experience in performing other studies similar in nature to the work scope and plan included in this proposal, we propose to provide the service set forth in Tasks I through 8 for the estimated cost of $26,500. This estimate reflects three trips to the City of Denton, the first to meet with the Utility Staff, become familiar with the City's needs and goals, discuss the determination of the Test Year period, and review data available for the study; the second to review intermediate results with the City after completion of Task 5; and the third to present the final report. Should additional trips be requested by the City for further presentation, the cost of such additional trips would be estimated based on hourly rates for the people involved, the time required and expenses. Costs for additional trips would be estimated and submitted to the City for approval prior to making the additional trips, We are willing to discuss revisions to the project scope and resulting cost adjustments to meet the needs of the City of Denton, ADDITIONAL SERVICES For additional services requested by the City, not outlined in the Scope, we propose that the City would pay the Consultant, upon submission of monthly Invoices, an amount equal to the actual hours of services furnished by the individuals working directly on the assignment multi- plied by the product of our established hourly laL•or cost for each individual, The City would reimburse the Consultant each month at cost for all out-of-pocket expenses directly chargeable to the work and for use of the Firm's computer and reproduction facilities at the then current rates. The following list indicates the pay rates, including salary costs and a project multiplier of 2.4. The current hourly rates on this basis for each member of our Project Team are provided in the following list. ccVpr0026/692 R. W. Beck and Associates 5.1 COMPENSATION AND SCHEDULE A( (J,? llnm___2S LABOR HOUR REQUIREMENTS The following table presents our estimate of total labor hours to complete the Scope of Work as is outlined in Section 1, Estimated Task Description Trips Hours 1 Project Initialized Data Collection 1 24 2 Review of Projected Revenue Requirements and capacity and Energy Forecast 32 3 Develop Recommendations for Test Year Determination 32 4 Allocate Electric Cost of Service to Customer Classes 72 5 Interpretation of Cost of Service Study (COSS) and Review of Existing Rate Schedules and Desi 1 of Rate Schedules 1 68 6 Development of Fro posed Rates 40 7 Preparation of the Re ort 38 8 Report Presentation 1 24 ..4 PROJECT SCHEDULE Assuming authorization from the City early in July, and assuming that data for the study will be available from the City on a timely basis, we anticipate delivery of a preliminary draft report to the City by August 1, 1991 Upon review of the draft report and incorporation of comments from the City, we estimate a final draft can be delivered within 7 days and a final report delivered no later than August 24, 1991 ed/pr0026/692 R. W. Beck and Associates 5•3 ~ ~[ulrcld Ain _ yu2 -D/RMI ~~fJcrula It(, n S - ln, f~• I ri n~ k r fit, June 9, 1992 Mr. Robert E. [Nelson, RE, -Executive Director of Utilities City of Denton 215 East McKinney Denton, TX 76201 41 Subject; Proposal for an Electric Rate study Dear Mr. Nelson: On behalf of Resource Management International, Inc, (RMI), I am pleased to submit this Proposal to the City of Denton (City) for the purpose of conducting an Electric Rate Study. Enclosed are three copies of RMI's Proposal to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the rates charged for electric service, This Proposal ~I has been prepared in response to the City's Request for Proposal dated May 20, ii 1992, and is specifically based on the City's requirements. 4I RMI understands the complex issues that are involved in the Electric Rate Study that the City is contemplating. The consulting personnel that we propose to assign to this engagement have successfully completed similar studies of this importance and complexity. We are prepared to initiate work immediately and are fully capable of supporting all activities necessary to complete this engagement within the time period specified in this Proposal. As you review the enclosed proposal, I request that you take special note of RMI's experience and understanding of ratemaking issues that make us highly qualified to 4 conduct this important study for the City. This includes, Demonstrated Applicable Experience 4 RMT's C:Jnsultants have extensive experience in the performance of rate studies for electric utilities. This experience covers all facets of electric ratemaking and related matters. In addition, we have a thorough understanding of the functional activities and processes associated with the ~i financial and operating environment of a utility. Our proposal describes several relevant electric rate studies in which members of the project team proposed for this engagement have played significant roles, 8310 CArr AL ue tEXAS 11W:UAY V09nr,5urre 385 • Ausnr, TX 78731.1026. (512)1 ;5.5413 -FAX (512) 3056534 ,•i 0if o-w.~. I'L I'r.•i i~.,17. IS•an_ANI oR ~rc<ivr~rP. l'.\ I'.v IL fl 1 Mr. Robert E. Nelson y June 9, 1992 [)age 2 • Project schedule RMI is accustomed to completing complex assignments under demanding schedules. We understand that the capability to apply a broad range of analytical and managerial expertise within a limited schedule will be important to the City. A Quality Assurance Practices RMf is an acknowledged leader in the field of p,viinage onst~tteder the to utilities and regulators. 1'he firm and our people delivery of high quality work products based upon thorough and independent analyses. This project, as with all of our engagements, will be conducted in accordance with prudent quality control practices which will withstand the scrutiny of external parties, Personnel Qualifications In undertaking a project of this nature, it is important that a seaso, 1 project team be established. We have proposed a team of consultants for this project who have substantial experience, both in the establishment of rates co for p hmg utilities and in the successful management of chaRenging engagements. The Project Mwnager will be Richard Covington. Mr. Covington has been in served the utility business orover lecteleven utility~anddas aManageruof Ra es and electric Director of Rates for an Economics for a natural gas company. He has participated in or directed electric rate studies for a broad range of utilities. Mr, Covington will be assisted on an as needed basis by an experienced team of rate ppbrjof~ession~ including Dr. Michael Schmidt, co-author of Rate Design for utilities, published by the American Public Power Association, I will provide issues and the review executive htsagotmpetit with of future revenue re(lurmen n of final results. KM1 It i,,), aci %I%S 1111111 1•.t. K1%1 ru% ~1 1 . , If 'S Mr. Robert E. Nelson June 9, 1992 sY Page 3 We appreciate the opportunity to submit this Proposal and look forward to the prospect of performing this work for the City of Denton. Should you have any questions regarding this Proposal, or if we can be of assistance in any other way, please do not hesitate to contact me or Mr. Covington. Sincerely, R. John 4iner P al Executive Consultant q Enclosure Iq RMI I'. Nj villa PJn 1~ D/8 DAO SEC11ON Vi COST PROPOSAL. itMI proposes to perform the Scope of Services Presented in Section II of this Proposal on w a time and expense reimbursement basis within a budget limit which will not be exceeded without the prior written approval of the City for the scope of work as described in this Proposal, RMI will invoice work on a monthly basis, with a detailed statement describing work performed and a full accounting for hours spent and expenses Incurred, The Scope of Services and the specific schedule for performance of the work are subject d to adjustment depending on any additional tasks requested by the City during the course of the study. In addition, the level of effort and scheduled completion dates associated d with the study could vary from that assumed herein due to the unavailability of critical data or difficulties in scheduling meetings with the City. However, based on the Scope of Services described earlier and the assumed availability of all necessary supporting data In a timely manner and in the right format, the cost estimate shown in Table VI-1 has been prepared for this assignment. This estimate is for the Scope of Services described in this Proposal and is based on the assumption the City will provide the Minimum level of data d shown in Section rh, d' •I'able VI-1 includes a budget breakdown by task to present the budget limit, This task breakdown is for budget estimating purposes basis of our proposed the right to modify the level of effort p q er task as thewo krequires T reserves ' prrovoyided the authorized total budget level is not exceeded. RMI's hourly consulting rates are shown on d Exhibit Vi-1, 161 •I'he cost estimate shown in Table VI-1 has been prepared based on the level of effort we feel appropriate for the type of analysis to be undertaken for the City. Should the City r prefer a dllferent Icvei of detail than assumed herein, we would be ha PpY to prepare a revised cost estimate which reflects the desired stud approach, d, y VI-1 d' TABIX VI-i COS-P PROPOSAL TASK TASK DES(.MUMON HOURS NUMBER COST 1 • 5 Orientation and Data Development 32 $ 30300 6-9 Review of Test Year Data/Develop 48 _ 4,940 Revenue Requirements 10 • 14 Cost of Service Study W` 90 9,360 r 15. 17 Proposed Rates 55 w_ 5,400 18 • 19 Final Report so 30000 r Total _ 275 _ $26,000 L'xpenses (1) - 1 20900 TOTAL SPUDY COST' $28,900 NOTli (1); Includes travel reproduction, and telecommunications expense, i r i r VI.2 i ~ljorrda No. ~ d AgNidaItIml_-l S to Herr VI-1 RESOURCE MANAGEMIr.NT NATIONA[, [NC. VEFS FOR SERVICES 1992 Managing Executive Consultant Principal Executive Consultant $135 per hour ' Execudve Consultant $120 per hour Principal Consultant $115 per hour Supervising Consultant $105 per hour +I Senior Consultant $ 95 per hour t Associate Professional $ 85 per hour Analyst $ 75 per hour / Research Assistant $ 65 Per hour ■ Technician $ 50 per hour office Services $ 43 Per hour $ 39 per hour PMi fees shall be adJusted each year co change in fees officially established by the Board of pliecro lof ~Ih year to reflect the V!•3 Ailf)II(fa No, Apda p,tJJ rl'Inrd Part vuv, BO. (50= f-!a d,li)5 ! nnsristl,SSCun 1,111,4, 9175339 <<Y June 9, 1992 R Department of Utilities City of Denton, Texas 215 E, McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Attention: Mr. R, E. Nelson, P,E, Executive Director of Utilities RE: Request for Proposal for an Electric Utility Rate Study We are pleased to submit our proposal to perform an electric utility rate study for the Department of Utilities of the City of Denton. Black & Veatch has over 15 years of national and regional experience in conducting the type of rate study requested. We are particularly pleased that over the years our recommendations and high quality of services have been so well received, This is evidenced by the fact that nearly 70 percent of our engagements are repeat assignments. Our proposal is presented below in the following sections: Scope of Work Qualifications Experience/Representative Engagements Key Personnel • Cost Estimate Schedule The Qualifications section of this proposal provides a background of Black & Veatch In general and the firm's Management Services Division in particular. If selected, personnel assigned to this Division will perform the study, This section highlights our involvement in financial studies for our many utility clients. A description of our various services is included, 1 1 S Page ? Ar, R, E. Nelson, P,E. June 9, 1992 scope is tntenttlufdUtilities~lr tyuest for proposal the The scope of Wnrk sectir sppot styestottr Sthe ugepar can and will to pproach all scope can and will be tailored of serrlr~Ct rvice,andtr to designrirltt;I "'Innertwhichtis both thorough of our studies, including c and practical, By so doing, the results are both useful and the study economically prepared. We realize that policy considerations are an important part of utility system operations. lity Black & Veatch views ole cis an d isol'hirs role each res tuhs innain eftecuive rclatironshipswith offered as suggestions rather than our clients. The Ex to +tterformed}foreetlectric ut+fides,talonBtwithtlisltingstoftrepre~senta- Black } references es to similar studies p five engagements for electric rate studies. As demonstrated by this experience, investor Veatch serves a wide vauttil tits, t?~ bistwell rounded client basetassures +tt our knowledge of I customer groups of these 1 available options, Objectivity, added dimension of ptstghttinto l Pethics in r°blemstltnd possible solutions studies, It also hr g as well as an understanding of supplier and customer paradigms. pertormtng tl e work, fir The Key Personnel section offiout nan cibh~and ecc nomictexptertitsegi) lor (Ile proposed study, firm will utilize engineering, 1 cx erience sionsl~regurdi~gttheewo k, ~lr, Brady hastover provide 15 ytars ars' e pe oca Robert J. Brady will serve , as access to important working with electric utilities, and hs1 personally developed numerous electric utility cost of service and rate design studies since The Cost Estimate section Of tlctou ll~tesltintated cost to Cotmpleteltth~ tptroposedpscopenof to be assigned to the work and the work. The Schedule section of this proposal provides our proposed s.i :Lade for Completion of the scope of work. you wi 4Vetlarchconfident tthat Outsyshope tematict pproach We sincerely desire the opportunity oal aconduct ' give careful consideration to Dur propos will ognizing local result in recommendations which can be readily implemented while rec conrems. ~ileiEda (lent- /~S fir, R. E. Nelson, P.1:. Page June 9, 1992 The Scope of Work section presents our suggested method to compiete the study. While the scope is designed ;o be responsive to the Department of Utilities' request for proposal, the scope can and will be tailored to meet specific requirements. We endeavor to approach all of our studies, including cost of service and rate design in a manner which is both thorough and practical. By so doing, the results are both useful and the study economically prepared. We realizo that policy considerations are an important part of utility system operations, Black & Veatch views its role as an advisor to each utility and, as such, our opinions are offered as suggestions rather than directives, 'T'his role results in an effective relationship with our clients. e 1'he Experience/Representative Engagements section of this submittal contains specific references to similar studies performed for electric utilities, along with listings of'representa- tive engagements for electric rate studies. As demonstrated by this experience, Black & Veatch serves a wide variety of public and investor-owned udJtics and customers and customer groups of these utilities, ']'his well rounded client base assures our knowledge of available options, objectivity, and adherence to professional ethics in the performance of our studies, It also brings an added dimension of insight into problems and possible solutions as well as an understanding of supplier and customer paradigms, The Key Personnel section of our submittal presents the staffing for the proposed study. The fine will utilize engineering, financial, and economic expertise in performing the work, Mr. Robert J. Brady will serve as Project Nlanager for the study and will provide convenient local access to important decisions regarding the work, Mr, Brady has over 15 ),cars experience working with electric utilities, and has personally developed numerous electric utility cost of service and rate design studies since 1975, The Cost Estimate section of our proposal presents the proposed billing rates for personnel to be assigned to the work and the total estimated cost to complete the proposed scope of work, The Schedule section of this proposal provides our proposed whedule tier completion of the scope of work. We sincerely desire the opportunity to conduct the proposed studies and hope that you will give careful consideration to our proposal. We are confident that Our sysicniatic approach will result in recommendations which can be readily implemented while recognizing local concerns. Agpntj~j ! Mr, R. E, Nelson, Y.E. Lhpt ' Page 3~s June 9, 1992 We look Ponvard to the opportunity to Further discuss our proposal with representative' of the Department of Utilities of the City of Denton, proposal or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call lJ, r io Brady at (913) / 339-3372, at your convenience, !f you have (luestions regarding our Very truly yours, r BLACK & VEATCH John R. Stack Senior Planner Ikm Enclosure i i i r r r Cost Estimate The following preliminary cost estimate for the proposed scope is based on hourly rates for the classification of individuals directly involved in the study, plus expenses and out- of-pocket costs, Proposed hourly rates for perfonnance of financial studies by Black & Veatch are shown in the tabulation below. Job Descriotion Hourly Billing Rate /Hr. Stenographic 35,00 Technical Support 55,00 Project Engineer 75,00 Assistant Project Manager 00.00 Project Manager 105,00 Partner 150.00 Invoices shall be due upon receipt. if an invoice is not paid within 30 days of receipt, interest will be added and will accrue at the rate of 1.1/2 percent per month. Invoices will be submitted in approximately 4-week intervals (l3 per year). r Department of Utilities City of Denton, 'Texas Not to Exceed Cost Hours Cost r $ Partner 10 1,500 r Project Manager 120 121600 Project Engineer 140 10,500 Technical Support 40 2,200 Stenographic 40 1,4(10 Subtotal 350 211,200 Expenses 5 t 'T'otal 33,200 If the services can be cornpteted in less time and at less cost, the Department will be billed only for the actual fees incurred. The above not to exceed cost eseludes expert witness related work. r ?I r .CITY COUNCIL: J-P ~ dapbflQ00 pp t:: oop\p o r o e p0~j~/ -DO ~ a O~ a U~ C I~~pF~r i **bJ p~~~COuCr~4GG~ ti~ 06/23/9'1. G'iT1 C_Ol1NC'I1,_ftI T-1 l'I'_1?C)R_dIA'i DATE: 4p'1' 1a 1'0; Alayor and Members of the City Council A(;e''j•'!Ic!„p.---- FROM; Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager [l'i~ _ ~3.c~Z SiJB.J; Approval of a resolut;ion authorizing the City Manager to submit nn amendment to the 1990 Final Statement of Community velopment Objectives and Projected Use of Funds submi.,ted to the Department of Housing anci Urban Development, Approval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute all. necessary documents to provide that - $20000 in 1990 CDBG runcis be designated to be used in conjunction with a Section 202 VI derly Housing Program Grant application by the National Development Council. fODWA TLQNr The Community Development Block Grant Committee recommends approval. Minutes of the June 9th meeting are attached. E &,Uc G UN11; As part of the 1990 Final Statement;, City Couno.il approved the use of $100,000 in CDC1G funding to subsidize the City's participation in HUD's Urban Homesteading program. The City's application to the program was not approved. Those funds are now available for reallocation to other projects. During the past year, the Denton Housing Authority (DHA) and the City of Denton have been studying the possibility of rehabilitating the Crawford Building (Razor Building) for use as low income elderly housing. Discussions with the County Commissioners have concluded. The Commissioners are preparing the, necessary documentation in order to donate the Crawford Building to the Denton Housing Authority contingent on DIIA's purchase of the surrounding property. The County is requesting it payment; of $223,960 for the property. This is the amount the County originally paid to purrhaso the property. The Denton llousing Authority has also approached the Denton County Housing Finance Corporation in order to roquest funding for the property purchase, Section 202 funding requirements do not allow cities or local public housing authorities to apply for funding. As it result of this, the National Development Council (NDC), which is currently under contract with HUD to provide technical assistance to the City of Denton and our non-profit,, is setting up a local non-prof it, In order to take possession of the property and make Page 2 Aij,.,ndt'hm.._~`~_ I) I to Application to [IUD for the Section 202 funds, It is Important to note that NDC is not requi.red, cinder their l~ technical assistance contract, to set up a local, •ion- profi.t, The Community Development staff and DHA would like to officially express our appreciation to NDC for their assistance. Community Development is currently working to set up a local non-profit housing development corporation to serve the City, This organization will have the ability to raise funds for similar projects from both the public and private sectors, It is anticipated that after development of the City's local housing non-profit, NDC will requ9st that [IUD allow the ownership of the Crawford Bot1 ling elderly housing project to be transferred to the new local non-profit 5U¢1h~llY : I'lie accompanying resolutions will allow the City to amend the 1990 Final Statement and allocate $26,000 in CDBC[ funds to the Crawford Building project, Low income, elderly citizens Denton Housing Authority Community Development Office Denton County National Development Council 15 AL IMP CT: Them will be no impact: on the General. Fund, Respect ally submitted: Llovgt' v , Harrell City Manager PreTared bv: r I Dai-barn [toss Community Development Coordinator Approved: ,~~I; ' ~ k Robbins AICP Executive Di.roctor for Planning & Development /Viwirla No _.._Vu_?__.:c-/~__.... . Unofficial Minutes CDBG Committee Meeting June 9, 1992 Civil Defense Room Members Present: Curtis Ramsey, Katie Flemming, Jack Weir, Peggy Norton, Rosemary Rodriquez. Members Absent With Notification: Dennis Stephens, Fred Hill, Sara Parker, Ray Trejo. Members Absent Without Notification: None Also Present: Marian Hamilton, Executive Director, Denton Housing Authority; Cheryl Fox, Manager, Heritage Oaks Staff Present: Barbara Ross, Community Development Administrator; Eric Billips, Community Development Program Assis- tant; Nancy Baker, Community Development Secretary, Chairperson, Curtis Ramsey, called the meeting to order at 12:18 P.M. Mr, Ramsey asked Barbara Rose to brief the Committee Members on the Section 202 Grant to be used for the Crawford Building Elderly Housing Project. Ms. Barbara Ross, Community Development Administrator, told the Committee that the Section 202 Grant was funded annually by HUD. Me, Ross said that the Denton Housing Authority nor the City of Denton was eligible to apply for this grant money as it must be requested by a non-profit. Ms. Ross stated that Sally Loveland of the National Development Council has offered to sponsor the City in applying for the grant, A commitment from the City of $26,000 is required with the application. Any unused portion would be returned to the City. Ms. Roes stated that the City of Denton had previously allocated $100,000 of tho CDBG funds to subsidize other HUD funds for an urban homesteading program. The Urban Homestead- ing application was not funded, therefore, those funds are available for reallocation, Ms. Ross provided the Committee members with two draft resolutions to be approved by the City Council, The first resolution would authorize the city Manager to sign and submit an amendment to the 1990 Final Statement of Community Development objectives and Projected Use of Funds submitted June 22, 1990 to the 06partment of Housing and Urban Development with appropriate certifications, as authorized and required by the Housing and Community Development Act of i974, which allocated approximately $100,000 of the entitlement funds for development of an urban homesteading grogram, that would reallocate an approximate amount of $26,000 of the urban homesteading funds to be used for the purpose of supporting an application for Section 202 Elderly Housing funding to rehabilitate the Crawford Building to be used as low income elderly housing. Ms. Ross stated that the second resolution would authorize the City Manager to submit a commitment that $25,000 in 1950 Community Development Block grant funds be utilized in conjunction with a Section 202 Elderly Housing Grant application for start-up expenses of the project. Me. Ross introduced Marian Hamilton, Director of the Denton Housing Authority and Cheryl Fox, Manager of the Heritage Oaks apartments to the Committee members and stated they are the key individuals working to accomplish the project. Me. Ross asked the Members if they had any questions regarding the project. Katie Flemming, Committee Member, asked Marian Hamilton what the downtown infrastructure was to support residents who would live at the Crawford Building. Me. Hamilton stated that for the most part, the location had several benefits. The one drawback would be closr, accessibility to grocery stores but Ms. Hamilton stated they were working with SPAN on making transportation available to tenants of the Crawford Building. Ms. Hamilton stated there are at least six restaurants within walking distance, as well as the downtown shopping area. Ms. Roes also pointed out that this project would be a positive step in preserving the existing low/moderate income residential area which is a designated "preservation area." Ms. Rosemary Rodriquez, Committee Member, asked what the need for this type project was. Ms. Cheryl Fox, Manager of Heritage Oaks said that the waiting list for the Heritage Oaks never- falls below 50. Me. Fox also stated, in relation to the infrastructure the Oaks really area than Heritage question, a accessibility to conveniences at will offor tenants. Mr. Ramsey asked how many residents the Crawford Building would house. Ma. Hamilton stated that it was estimated that it would house approximately 24 residents. Me. Fox said that in order to receive funding for this project, the project would need to house at least 40 residents and for that reason, the project would also include an addition to the existing structure to be built. Mr. Ramsey asked if the Blain Hotel was going to be part of the project. Me, Fox said that was still being discussed but it was probable that it would. Mr. Ramsey asked if the Section 202 funds would allow funds for maintaining the property. Ms. Hamilton responded that funds would be allowed for some operating expenses of the property and that since they would have no debt service, as in the case of the Phoenix and Heritage Oaks, they would have funds for maintenance. !is. Fox said it would allow more operating funds than the bonds for Agenda Ilww---- ...~_7' Unofficial Idi nutea CDGG Committee Meeting June 19, 1992 Page 3 Heritage Oaks allows. Mr. Ramsey asked if a dollar estimate has been projected for a good Me. Fox there Is at this before project, be madelbutloffered have l to ilook of her guess to be around one million dollars. Mr. Ramsey asked the Committee Members if there were any further questions regarding this project. There were not, in support of 1990 CDBG fundscfor1ethe~purpose City Mr. Council Ramsey to reallocate $26,000 motion supporting an application for Section 202 Elderly Housing funding of the fromthe Crawford National Development to e be p used as pl low l infor come h elderly housing. C Ms. Rodriquez moved to accept the motion. Ms. Peggy Norton seconded the motion. The motion was voted on and was approved unanimously. March forth 23, 1992 and March 26, minutes of the Mr. aRarymsey,then put J Mr. Jack Weir moved to accept the motion. Hs. Rosemary Rodriquez seconded the motion. The motion was voted on and was approved unanimously. Mr. Ramsey asked Committee Members if there was any further business to discuss. There was not. Mr. Ramsey adjourned the meeting at 12:40 p.m. nt,t,0026e`,240, a Arjontla Nu A11e,ida 11(!m 7 , RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION AU'I'liORIZING TUF C:LTY MANAGER 11'0 S THE 1990 FINAL STATEMEN'T' OF COMMUNITY D PROJECTED USF OF UIIMIT AN AMENDMENT 1fOUSING FUNDS 5UBM.IT'D JUNE 2 EVFL'OPMFNT 08JFCTIVES TO AlJTNO AND URBAN bFVELOF'MENT WITH i990 PO THE DEPARTMENTAOF ACT OF RI 1997 77 AND RFQUIRFb 13Y ""'F ffOUSING OPRIATE CERTIFICATIONS, AS 91 AS AMENDED; AND PROVIDING AND C AN EFFOCTIVFTbA'DEV of via ELOPMENT wilEREns, the city of Dent" is c ble urban commun.itiec on , cerned with the living environment and expanded nog clQCent tuniti development mic opportuni~ius~a suitable WffEREAS, the City of Denton has a of low and moderate income; special concern for persons WHEREAS, the cit pared, through a the irynof Denton, as an entitlement cit lizing its 1990 enti.tlementticfpation process Y, has pre- $559,139,00; and funds in the approximate amount of WFlEREAS, the City of Denton had proximate amount of $J.oO, 000 of the ontptlvment funds l meat of an urban homesteading program; and for develop_ WHEREAS, the Cit an approximate amount Of of Denton, Texas, now desires to reallocate for the maee of tl $25,000.00 of the urban homesteadin clergy Housing Pro PPOrtlncL an application for a g funds the re habilittiogram through the National Develo Section cil Street, ba of the Crawford BuildJ.n pment Council for Nor, TlfEREFORE~ Texas, to be Used as low g located at 306 Income elderly Locust Y housing; '1'11E COUNCIL, OF TILE CITY OF DENTON JjERFBy RESOLVESI AEI-00 1. That the Cit. authorizes the City Manager to submit and Urban bevelo bmit to of De the City of Denton rtm the 1990 Final state tt an amendment for the reallocationtoff Housing ment that was application and appropriate asburanc,ov four lsubmitted for a gr In ant the liousing and Commun.it entitlement funds under support an application for bevelnpment Act of, 1979, as amended, to be J.ocated in the Crawford Bu li ec to provide elderl Texas. g, 306 Locust y housing to street, Denton, e'ECUON_U, That the city t or his designee to handle a.ll fiscal nda~m.inistIs tive city to the amended final statement, Y Manager ers re- Ago nda No.._._xa3 Ane+itla Ile i--e3 (mlo SECTION III, That this resolution shall become effective im- mediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992, BOB CASTLEBERRY,W MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DA©RA A. DRAYOVITC![, CITY ATTORNEY I Page 2 AMENDMENT TO THE 1990 FINAL STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS This '-s an amendment to the 1990 Final. statement submitted to the Department of Housing and Urban Development on June 22, 1990, The City of Denton wishes to real.l.ocate $25,000 of the $1001000 previously allocated to the Urban Homesteading program to the following; Crawford Building Rehabilitation $26'000 The City will provide these funds to provide a financial commitment as required by federal regulations in order to submit a request for rehabilitation funds under the Section 202 Elderly Housing program, Section 202 funds will be utilized to rehabilitate the Crawford Building for use as low income, elderly housing. Application will be made by a local non-profit affiliate of the National Development Council. the rehabilitation find management of m the Denton Housingy will be the Authority, Objective: To increase the supply of affordable housing for low and very low income persons Texas Tract Street, Block enton~ Location; 306 ensus bocust Group l C Any commonts regarding the amendment should be directed to the Community Development Office 110 W. Oak, Suite B Denton, 'T'exas (817) 383-7726 - - - - T- T CITY ri I.~ 1 -COUNCIL - # - L m x_ m IT T 7: f - - - - - a - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - '~QQ[10000 a0 :,:..4 t OOH ° r D F ~~~V, r •l o a b~~4flcflu 't # 1 t I ALL002G9\240,0 nir.fa h!p- _ . I)31e ..__~P -,23-92 RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION AUTTIORTZITIG THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS TO PROVIDE THAT $25,000 IN 1990 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS BE DESIGT(ATED TO 13E USED IN CONJUNCTION WIT" A SECTION 202 NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL; AND PROGRAM PROVIDI G GRANT FOR AN E FECTIVEYDATE. WHEREAS, the City of Denton is a contributing body to the Na- tional Development Council in a project seeking approval of a Sec- tion 202 Elderly Housing Program; WHEREAS, Section 202 Elderly Housing Program requires the National Development Council to demonstrate a commitment of p colter advance estimated sufficient funds by nthe Department not covered by capital Housing and Urban Development; WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Urban Development has determined that assurance by the National Development Council of its commitment and willingness to provide those funds can best be assured by requiring a resolution of the contributing body that up to a specified amount of funds will be made available for such purposes. IJOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OE' DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: That the City Council of the City of Denton pledges the sum of $25,000 in Community Development Block Grant funding in support of the National Development Council's sponsor.- ship of a Section 202 Elderly Housing f~ Program Street, application to rehabilitate the Crawford Building, Texas. SECTION That the funding will be made available for the this project to meet estimated start-tip expenses specified in this application, the minimum capital investment and the estimated coat of any amenitien or features (an tloperptiogeco is re la ed h eeto) which would not be covered by which are specified in this application. SE,JL1j III. That the City Council of the City of Denton authorizes the City Manager or his designee to execute all neces- sary documents and to handle all fiscal and administrative matters related to the provision of these funds for the National Develop- men';. Council's Section 202 Elderly Housing Program grant application, MjnndaNo, . ~.~b p ~ ABvmda Item. / s a IA SECTION _IV. 'T'hat thi.S resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval, _ 1992. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of i&-B CASTLE43ERRY, MAYOR - ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY,. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM'AT'FORNEY DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY 1 BY: LP i it I- -CITY { ` COUNCILI . ~11[ Ail ~.-OGO~OOO OP AF~~O~~, ~ - O C - R i Ager~zl l:a~r1_ a~'. r - C___-- wl(j Gt G /e `J CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM June 23, 1992 TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager RE: CONSIDER A REAOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, COMPLYING WITH THE ORDER FOR INFORMATION BY REGION 8 OF THE UNI^ ED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, AS CONTAINED IN DOCKET NO. VI-91-2891; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the information provided in the Municipal Water Pollution Prevention Program environmental audit to comply the Environmental Protection Agency's Order for Information Docket No, VI-91-2841. The Public Utilities Board will review and set forth their recommendation on June 22, 1992, This recommendation will be placed before the council at their meeting on June 23, 1992, SUMMARY The City of Denton is required to submit updated environmental audit information and a council resolution no later than July 1 of each year, The environmental audit information must address compliance activities for the previous twelve month period from April 1 through March 31, BACKGROUND The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) initiated the Municipal Water Pollution Prevention (MWPP) program to encourage municipal wastewater facilities to nron,Ide sufficient resources for compliance maintonance prior to becoming now, r:n~littnt. EPA's goals for the MWPP include "prevention of wastewater permit violations; maximizing the useful life of Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) through effective operation, mnintenanco, and financial management; reduced waE1owater flows and loadings; and ensuring timely planning and financing for future needs and growth prior to the occurrence of wastewater permit violations." The MWPP program requires the annual submission of information pertinent to Denton's wastewater system, EPA is requiring this information from all wastewater systems in the EPA Region VI. The MWPP program requirements are outlined in an "Order for Information" (see Exhibit 111). The "Order for information" requires an annual environmental audit of Denton's wastewater facilities. Information in the audit will be reviewed by EPA to dotorming areas of likely noncompliance. The major elements of this audit include, Part 4 Description 1. Influent Flow/BOD loadings 2. Effluent Quality/Piant Performance 3. Age of Wastewater Treatment Facilities 4. Overflows and Bypasses 5. Ultimate Disposition of Sludge 6. Now Development 7. Operator Certification and Training 81 Financial Status 9, Subjective Evaluation 10, Point Calculation Table The audit process generates points that are based on the facility's answer to the question. The EPA did not specify what these points mean, but it is obvious that a high point score indicates poor plant conditions and a low score indicates a plant in good condition, The Denton wastewater system scored a total of 102,5 points out of a total of 920 points possible, (see Exhibit IV, Point Calculation Table). EPA requires the submission of a resolution (see Exhibit I) from the Denton City Council concerning the acknowledgement of the information provided in the environmental audit and actions that the council has taken to ensure permit compliance, Section 309 of the Act, as amended by the Water Quality Act of 1987, provides civil and criminal penalties for failure to submit information required under Section 308 and criminal penalties for knowingly making false statements, FISCAL IMPACT No direct fiscal impact as a result of these actions, The potential exist for future indirect costa from accelerated compliance schedules, administrative orders, etc. AGENCIES AFFECTED Citizens of Denton, Denton Municipal Utilities Wastewater Department, Denton City Council Prepared bye Respectfully, Howard Martin, Director Lloyd V. Harrell Environmental Operations/Fin. Adm, City Manager .._.__9 C1L. tglawla No kjoida R. E. Nelson, Executive Director Department of Utilities EXHIBITS: I, Resolution II Environmental Audit (under separate cover) III MWPP Order for Information IV Point Calculation Table BILE: C: 1WP611PUBAGEND\MWPP792 A:PUBMWPP,622.pg, q &4 RESOLUTION N4. OF DENTON, TEXAS, COM- OF THE UNITED CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT OF THE TION SY REGION 6 IN DOCKET NO• p, RESOLUTION ORbER FOR INFORMA AS CONTAINED PLYING WITH THE EFFECTIVE DATE. STATES ENVIROANME PROV DING FOR AN GENC r VI,91-26411 discharges effly Rteg'onr6tof the the City of Denton issued by WHERofS,the Permit No. TX0047180, and A ency (EPA)i the EPA thority prbtection g Clean Water Act, Environmental of the Prevention (MW PP) pro- ' WHEREAS, under the aut or ry Pollution has initiated a Municipal Region 6 of the grams and of the MWPP' requesting that the purp0see VI-91-2641), WHEREAS, tc further Docket No. THEREFORE, order ( NOW, EPA has tissue this resolutions DENTON# TEXAS: the City CITY OF BY THE COUNCIL OF THE al Water BE IT RESOLVED with the Mul VT compliance Docket No. VI-91-2641)) That, Protection Ag S,SN Orderfrom theoEn ironmentaof an Environmental Pollution Pr,ventio1~911 submission rior to Tu1y 1 of dated September 5th, comgleti.on aneatment Plant p (EPA), requiring EPA Region 6 that t lianceowith Audit for the pCit0 Counoilainfot ken to maintain comp each y,ar, the City have been actions will be or Permit N0• TX0047180' al water Pollution NPDES the Municiport (attached to this 1. That it has reviewed prevention EanSv EXnibit A) Audit Rep neaessary to ,,Solution actions it has taken the following in NPOES Permit 2. That ermit requirements contained 1991: maintain P effective November 25r Design No. TX0047180, and Prelimina~Yreatment Completed an Uprating Wastewater a. for the Denton Report plaritl Design and Zpe13fMGD) Completed-the Detailed of phase b• the Construct pr vaments Yequired for tnd p for 15 MGD) and Pha compl i~ance s pe,mit ,,vices Costruction S to Approved an Engineering and Assoc ates ve- c• with Alan PlummQr necessary Contra's of the_._ begin construction tewater Treatment plan~• ments at the Denton Was t~■ 0CS\M,PP , RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, COM- PLYING WITH THE ORDER FOR INFORMATION BY REGION 6 OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, AS CONTAINED IN DOCKET NO. VI-91-2641; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Denton discharges effluent under the au- thority of NPDES Permit No. TX0047180, issued by Region 6 of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); and '.44FREAS, under the authority of the Clean Water Act, the EPA has initiated a Municipal Water Pollution Prevention (MWPP) pro- graml and WHEREAS, to further the purposes of the MWPP, Region 6 of the EPA has issued an order (Docket No. VI-91-2641), requesting that the City issue this resolution; NOW, THEREFORE, r f BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That, in compliance with the Municipal Water Pollution Prevention Order For Information (Docket No. VI-91-2641), dated September 5, 1991, from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), requiring the completion and submission of an Environmental Audit for the Denton Wastewater Treatment Plant prior to July l of each year, the City Council informs EPA Region 6 that the following actions will be or have been taken to maintain compliance with NPDES Permit No. TX0047180t 1. That it has reviewed the Municipal Water Pollution Prevention Environmental Audit Report (attached to this resolution as Exhibit A)., 2. That it has taken the following actions necessary to maintain permit requirements contained in NPDES Permit No. TX0047160, effective November 25, 1991: a. Completed an Uprating and Preliminary Design Report for the Denton Wastewater Treatment Plant; b. Completed 'the Detailed Design and Specifica- tions for the Construction of Phase I (13 MGb) and Phase II (15 MGD) improvements required for permit compliances c. Approved an Engineering Construction Services Contract with Alan Plummer and Associates to begin construction of the--necessary improve- ments at the Denton Wastewater Treatment Plant. r" 1~ Lim" j, 3. That it will consider approval of,an 1992-97 Capital Improvement Plan and Annual operating Budget that will increase rates approximately 101 in FY 1993 and 25% in FY 1994 to fund the operation and capital expense of approximately $9.18 million for Phase I improvements necessary for permit compliance. SECTION 1, That this resolution shall become effective imme- diately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTESTi r JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt DEBRA A. DRAYJVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BYs -ti1- PAGE 2 1 Aamll Ilem UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 6 114 THE MATTER OF DOCKET NO. VI-91- 2641 THE CITY OF DENTON § PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 308(a)(ta)(A) § CLEAN WATER ACT, (33 U.S.C. 4 1318(a)(4)(A)J § In Re; NP DES PERMIT NO. TX0047180 § ORDER FOR INFORMATION The following FINDINGS are made and Order issued pursuant to the authority vested to the Administrator of the above re the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by referenced statute (hereinafter the Act) and duly delegated to the Regional Administrator, Region 6, and duly redelegated to the undersigned Director, Water Management Division, Region 6, I, The city of Denton (hereinafter referred to as the "Permittee") is a municipality in the State of Texas, located in Denton County, the mailing address for which is 215 East McKinney Street, Denton, Texas 76201, Pursuant to the authority of Section 402(x)(1) of the Act, 33 U,S,C, 6 1942, Region 6 issued National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No, TX0047180 to the Permittee on September 19, 1986, with an effective date of September 20, 1986, The permit authorizes the discharge of specified qualities and quantities of effluent to receiving waters named Proan Creek; thence to Lake Lewisville in the Trinity River Basin, t T R:FX1 Aviida Ilcm-_-. /46S- 7 C Dockb~sNo ,--V-I--41-2641-- Page 2 Section 308(a) of the Act, 33 U.S.C. J 1318(a) provides that; Whenever required to carry out the objective of this Act, Including but not limited to , , determining whether any person is in violation of any limitation, prohibition or standard of performance the Administrator shall require the owner or oparator of any point source to provide such other information as he may reasonably require III FINDINGS OF FACT Part 11.8.5. of the permit requires that at all times all facilities shall be operated as efficiently as possible and in a manner which will minimize upsets and discharges of excessive pollutants, Part II.B,2. of the permit requires the Permittee to take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment, It is EPA's policy to promote pollution prevention wherever possible, To I accomplish this goal in the area of domestic waste treatment, EPA is Initiating the Municipal Water Pollution Prevention (Mb1PP) program. This MWPP program includes preventing wastewater permit violations; maximizing the useful lives of'Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) through effective operation and maintenance, financial management and reduced wastewater flows and loadings; and ensuring timely planning and financing for future needs and growth prior to the occurrence of wastewater permit violations, Agendi liem._ _ 5 7 C' Docket g~ VI.91.2641 ~ -?3 %Z Page 3 ORDER l/ Based on the foregoing FINDINGS and pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator under Section 308 (a)(4)(A) of the Act 33 U.S.C. I 1318(a)(4)(A), and Section 309(x)(3) of the Act, 33 U.S.C. $ 1319(a)(3), and duly delegated to the Regional Administrator, Region 6, and duly redelegated to the undersigned Director, Water Management Division, Region 6, it is ordered; r A. That the Permittee, by July 1, 1992, shall submit the information outlined In the attached environmental audit (Attachment 2) to EPA and a copy to the Texas Water Commission (TWC), This environmental audit shall be signed by a duly authorized representative of the POTW. The reporting period shall cover April 1, 1991, through March 31, 1992, B. That the Permittee shall submit a resolution from the POTW'■ governing body to EPA and a copy to the TWC. This resolution shall accompany the environmental audit and shall include the information found in Attachment 3, 21 Vx C. That the Permittee shall submit an updated environmental audit and accompanyin,;y~~,eolutioq '~.,'`"4wvt -,,ojy¢k;~E~A,NtY1iAC..YIar grii'w report shall cover the previous twelve month period from April 1 throuoh Keroh 3%1, /qjPjIWd No, Agenda Ilan _~a- DocktpeNo,_ VI.91-2641 Page 4 W 6 -,23 - layaj Section 309 of the Act, as emended by the Water Quality Act of 1987, provides civil and criminal penalties for failure to submit information required under Section 308 and criminal penalties for knowingly making a false statement under Section 308, This information should be addressed to the TWC and EPA at the following addresses: V.S, Environmental Protection Agency Region 6 Water Management Division Enforcement Branch (6W-E) 1445 Ross Avenue Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 Texas Water Commission Attn: Ms, Jennifer Sidnell, Chief Wastewater Enforcement Section Water,Quality Division P,O, Box 13087, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711.3087 This Order shall be in effect until the Permittee's NPDES permit is reissued to address these reporting requirements. The effective date of this Order shall be the date it is received by the Permittes, DATED: This SEP 0 5 1991 day of _ 1991, My on o, Knudson, F.E. Director , Water Management Division (6W) MUNICIPAL WATER POLLUTION PREe1o MWPP ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT REPORT PREPARED BY MMICIPALITY: STATE ; NPDES PEFMI T FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CONTACT PERSON: MUNICIPAL OFFICIAL TITLE TELEPHONE CHI E P OP,E RATOR ; NAME TELEPHONE SIGNATURE; AIJTNORIZEb TITLE DATE REPRESENTATIVE f j EPA REGION S _ MARCH 1991 L.J y _ Nonda NO, 0, List the average design flow and daily OODs loadings for our facility in the blanks below. If you are not aware of 'these des fgdllcbant1-ti-m r:dfer'Z-~3y to your 001 rtanual, //Y Aver-tge Flow Daily 0005 Loading (MGD) (Pounds per day) Design Crfteria, - 90% of the Design Criteria: C. How many times did the monthly flow (Col, 1) to the WWTP exceed 90% of the design flow? (Circle the appropriate number) 0-4 a 0 points; 5 or more • 5 points D. How many times did the average monthly flow (Col. 1) to the WWTP exceed the design flow? (Circle the appropriate number) 0 - 0 points; 1-2 = t points; 3-4 = 10 points; 5 or more t 15 points E. How many times did the maximum dally 9005 loading (Col. 3) to theWTPP exceed 90% of the dally design loading? (Circle the appropriate number) 0-1 d 0 points; 2-4 = 5 polntS; 5 or more = 10 points F. Ilow many times did the maximum daily 9005 loading (Col. 3) to the WWTP exceed the dally design loading? (Circle the appropriate number) 0 = 0 points; 1 C 10 points{' 2 = 20 points; 3 = 30 polntS; 4 = 40 polntst ' 5 or more = 50 points G. List each point value you circled for C through F in the blanks below and place the,total In the box, c i points = D points = _ E points • F points.. TOTAL POINT VALUE FOR PART 1 2nter this value on the point calculation table on the last page. 2 Agenda !!em 2S 7 (2; Maximum Daily Mass Loading Nio IIWPP Reporting Period NHS-N - Total 8005 TSS or N03-N Phosphorus Year Month (Ibs/day) (1159/day) (ibs/day) (lbs/day) Other 4 hynatln Item. , i~s " ~ ~ C, "l" many renths did the effluent 8005 concentratIDnD(6g/_I oadrnq- 'ibs/day! exceed 4o-, of permit I nits? appropriate number! (Circiz the 0 I = 0 points; 2 _ 10 points; 3 = 20 points; 4 = 30 points; ` or more = 40 points 0. Noll many months did the effluent PODS concentration (mg/1) or loading (Ihs/day) exceed permit limits? (Circle the appropriate number) 0 _ 0 poihts; 1-2 = S points; 3 or more t 30 points E. Now many nonth; did the effluent TSS concentration (mg11) or loading (lbs/day) exceed 90S of the permit limits? (Circle the appropriate number) 0-1 ; 0 points; 2 = 10 points; 3 ■ 20 points; 4 S 30 points; 5 or more ■ 40 points P. Now many months did the effluent TSS concentration (mg/1) or loading (lbs/day) exceed permit limits? (Circle the appropriate number) 0 = 0 points; 1-2 - 5 points; 3 or more a 30 points G. Now many months did the effluent Ammonia-Nitrogen or Nitrate-Nitrogen tonCentratlon (mg/1) or loading (ibs/day) exceed 90% of the permit limits? (Circle the appropriate number) 0.1 S 0 points; 2 10 points; 3 a 20 points; 4 ■ 30 points; 5 or more a 40 points H. Now many months did the effluent Ameonla,•Nltrogen or Nitrate-Nitrogen concentration (mg/ll or loadlnq (lbs/day) exceed permit limits? (Circle the appropriate number) 0 ■ 0 points; 1.2 = 5 points; 3 or more ■ 30 potnts 11 How many montht~did the effluent fecal Coliform concentration exceed the permit limits? (Circle the appropriate number) 0 O•points;, I-2 = 5 points; 3 or more = 30 points J. How many months did the effluent Phosphorus concentration (mg/1) or loading (lbs/day) exceed 90% of the permit limits? (Circle the appropriate member) 0.1 Z 0 points; 2 : 10 points; ' ; 20 points; 4 S 30 points; 5 or more S 40 points 6 v S c A,,enda Item,.. I': rT :GF 'r T1!f 6,;SIf.L+;il1' i(E1Ti!fliT ff..CILITIES l.. What year a+as the wastewater treatment plant constructed or last naior expansion to Increase the hydraulic capacity of the plant c om p l e t lid Current Year - (Answer to A.) Age In Yyears ears Enter Age in Part C., below. B. Check the type of treatment facility that is employed: Fctor ftechanIca I Treatment Plant 2.5 (Trickling filter, activated v sludge, etc.) Aerated Lagoon 2.0 Stabilization Pond 1.5 Other (Specify) 1.0 C, Multiply the factor listed next to the type of facility your community employs by the age of your facility to determine the total point value of Part 3: TOTAL POINT Mot FOR PART 3 = x I _ actorj` age Later this value or 50, which ever Is less, on the point calculation table on the last page. B A rode Ne. /peadalimt.__~~s DIN; _ ';tI111AT1 I'ISrcSIficri rf SLtCGf - - What is the final disposition of sludge from your treatment plant? 0. Cescribe sludge management practices C. if sludge is disposed of by land application (surface application or shallow Injection), complete the following; !I) Does your facility have access to sufficient land for: (Circle the appropriate point total.) 3 or more years - 0 polnts 24,35 months 10 points 12-23 months 20 polnts 6-12 months = 30 points less than 6 months _ 50 points (2) chat type of cover is on the site? Crops consumed by animals whose products are consumed by humans. Crops that are directly consumed by humans. Neither directly or indirectly consumed by humans. No plant cover 10 lr dcitit y h, ror- ;our f air access to su t f t Iand I?ndallen). S .Z G' ic(en y M ~Circie the filline sites anPrOPriate t total a noin ? or.11cre 1 24.3 Years 1?- Mon 0 points 6-123 monttlhs 10 points less than ti months _ 30 Points months points b0 points f?1 is the I anditll register ed/p@rmltted to receive Yes ....,.....0 Points sludge? r!o ...1466.50 Points t' Does tl~e fr/A in New llevico, see to below. Plan? sludge idisposal site have (New fl an approved ' Ground Nater Discharge Yes ...,....,.0 Points Iro "•.SO Points Does this city have an aPProved Sludge YeS , 4 " „ 0 points managment plan? (Oklahoma only) 110 It too So Point, TOTAL POINT VALUE F OR PART 5 Enter this total on the point calculation table on the last page. I? Agenda It/em_. 2S ~~j.. foes oior facility h"vv access to sufficient land fIIIfne sites /6 for: ,'Circle the appropriate point total) 3 or, nore years = 0 points 24-34 months = 10 points 12.23 Months 2 20 points 6-12 months - 30 points less than 6 months 50 points {z) Is the landfill registered/permitted to receive sludge? Yes 66606064140 Points r No ...,,...,.50 Polnts N/A In New Ilexico, see E. below. E. Does the sludge disposal site have an approved Ground Water Discharge Plan? (New ltezico only) Yes ...,,,....0 Points No .....,....50 Polnts F, Does this city have an approved sludge managment plan? (Oklahoma only) Yes ,..,..,,..0 Points No ..,.,x..,.50 Polnts• N/A TOTAL POMT VALUE FOR PART 5 I-j Enter this total on the point calculation table on the last page, 12 F ' Agenda NO, R_fe PAR1 OPERATOR CERTIFICATION AflD 1PAINING Provide information for your Wastewater Treatment Plant and Collection System (not Public Water Supply). A. Responsibie person-In-charge of operation per shift. SHIFT: NAME : _ TELEPHONE A: CERTIFICATION N: LEVEL:- LEVEL OF CERTIFICATION REQUIRED: SHIFT;__ NAME: TELEPHONE A: CERTIFICATION A: LEVEL: LEVEL OF CERTIFICATION REQUIRED: SHIFT: NAME: TELEPHONE d: CERTIFICATION LEVEL: LEVEL OF CERTIFICATION REQUIRED: _ SHIFT: NAME: TELEPHONE N: CERTIFICATION A: LEVEL OF CERTIFICATION REQUIRED: S. please attach an arganitational chart for your wastewater treatment collection treatment system personnelt4ons, maintenance, system, aboratnry, includIng the l 14 _P..L~....-- Agenda No. Agenda tt{t•rlii Ir tr t j., r,i 1n C'0' Varua1, TLE: I,,I'CEA OF EACH CERTIFICATION LEVEL appropriate] TOTAL: COMMENTS. _ E. Points determination for operator certification and training. (Circle the appropriate point totals below.) (1) Certification level for responsible person(s) in. charge; Ali meet or exceed required level. - 0 Pok.s Any below required level, 30 Points !2) Training for last certification period. All staff has required-training, - 0 Points Some staff has less than required training, but all staff with at least 1 year of service. has 1, points some training, ' Ono or more staff with at least l year of service J0 Points has no training, 16 1~'-7r G `I Agenda Item PAPT V: FI1b111C[AL STATUS All Financial Status Inrornation should be based on your Current Fiscal Year Oudnetr List Fiscal Year Begins: Ends; A, List your annual o&II costs, replacement costs (equipment replacement, such as motors, pumps, bearings, etc,, for the useful life of the treatment facility), debt service costs, training costs, and revenue. Annual Cost Require Actual Budget Wastewater Revenue ~ d - - 0&M: S _ S Total: Replacement: + Debt Service: - $ Training: + + s Sub Total: S = S Balance: f-. Debt Service: + S + 3 Debt Service ; S f Reserves: other Reserves: total: _,.R. B, Are revenues and expenditures for the wastewater utility/system posted to or kept in accounts separatf NA non-sewer accounts (i,e,, water utilities, public works, etc,)? (Circle one) Yes No Explain; l8 Atle'163 IWI 5=~~ G-- ( , Ire the equipr:rnt rcplacerenl fi nds In a seoregated accb't}~flt? - aQ 'Circle One' Yes NO Equipment replacement, such as motors, punps, bearings, etc „ for the useful life of the treatcent facility.) Equipment Replacement Fund Ben ImnIng Date r Balance: < - Additions: Disbursements: S Ending Balance, S 4ate:~___ Explain disbursements; t, What financial resources do you have avaitrblo to pay for your wastewater improvement/reconstructlon needs? (excluding maintenance replacement mentioned in D above) Is there a capital improvement% fund in plate? (Circle one' Yes No 2b Nloitdarlo.--2 Acienda Are there corn"ercial or industrlal dischargers to your ii<l tewater system? 'Circle Pro' Yea No Describe; (1) Co you have an industrial pretreatment program? (Circle one) Yes No If yes, describe! - (21 Have you pursued source reduction to reduce the load on your treatment works? (Circle one) Yes No If yes, describe! _ G. How are septic tank pumpings (septage) handled at the treatment plant or land application site? il, Have you considered development of a plan to address water conservation and/or the reduction of.organic and nitrogenous loadings to the e,f use of flow reduction treatment ban c on i use s of by garbage individuals disposal3s? etc~} devices (Circle one) Yes NO If yes, describa! 22 Agenda NO Agendalla~~__~S_ Co you have a'3 y prparai'+ to collect hazardous household fror, individuals at the wastewater treatment plant or other location is O prevent disposal in the ti.asteaiater collection system? CIrrIe )ne) Yes No If yes, describe; fl. Do you recover digester gas or have any other type of recycling or special programs associated with your wastewater treatment system? (Circle one) Yes No If yes, describe; Q. Is your community presently involved in formal planning for treatment facility upgrading. If yes, please describe: P. Now many times in the last year were there overflow or backups at any point in the collection system for any reasoA, except clogging of the service lateral connection? tines ' 24 Njonth No. AgenCkIlem_~5----7 C Is there policy enccuraeinq continu !no education and ttkiA•inin-g,fgr___4-a_S- +:a sr.ewater treatrient plant enl+loyees? Circle one Yes No !s it in wrItIr.g? {Circle one Yes NO Explain policy: W. Cescr!be any major repairs or mechanical equfpnent replacement that you made In the last year and include the approximate cost for those repairs, Do not Include major treatment plant construction or upgrradfng programs r X. Any addltfonal comments? (Attach additional sheets'if necessary.) 26 nrle,ion Rent ~S nITAIENi 3 SAMPLE IfNPP RESOLUTION Resolved that the city of that the following Actlons were ten informs EPA Region 6 akn y e (50verning body)' l' Reviewed the Munf kateyoll Lion P JtfaA Envirnnrren^~- Report which is attached to this resolution, al Audit 26 Set forth the following actions necessary to maintain permit requirements contained fn the NPOES Permit number a , r b. C d, Passed by 11 (majority) on (date) (unaminous) vote of the - POINT CALCULATION TABLE Agrnd~ Ilum .v,al Fill in the values from parts I through 7 in the columns below. Add the numbers in the left column to determine the point total that the wastewater system has generated for the previous year. Actual Maximum Actual Values Values Possible Part 1: Influent Fluw/Loadings 0 80 Points Part 2: Effluent Quality/Plant 0 310 Points Performance Part 3: Age of WWTP 22.5 50 Points Part 4: Overflows and Bypasses 20 100 Points Part 5: Ultimate Disposition of 50 200 Points Sludge Part 6: New Development 0 30 Points Part 7: Operator Certification 10 150 Points ti TOTAL POINTS 102.5 910 Points FwA4XH I B I T / 9.29 -C ITY t COUNCIL r T, #I i 1 ~t r ry i 44 r o~12oo~ooaaaooo~,o~ - c: J V '1 90 r f4 Iylyly yII~~~~ 11 1 C t , i ` X14 ~ i ,tYft ~ ~ t~ CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Attbnrfz IU;ra 2r.u`__"_2_D'-.--.. r1l0; Mayor and Members of the City Council ~gG /et~/7 FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager DATE: May 26, 1992 SUBJECT: Matching Grant for Park Development RECOMMENDATION: Consider a resolution to authorize the Parks and Recreation Department to submit an application for a matching gran to fund development at the new 200 acre South Denton park site. SUMMARY,: To maximize existing bond funds and provide basic park facilities at the 200 acre South Denton park site, the a rks and Recreation Advisory Board has recommended an applicon x Parks and Wildlife submitted to grant. The City would fund its portion through 1986 B ndmFunds. BACKGROUND: After conducting six neighborhood meetings to discuss the implementation an the remaining 1986 Bond Funds, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommended the acquisition of park land in South and Northeast Denton. in addition, there was strong support to provide basic park facilities at these sites much like uusedftacoilities found at and AvondalenParks. been the PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS_ AFFECTED_ The South Denton community as well as park users throughout the City will directly benefit from these expanded park facilities. this site enance costs will be FIS with any development operation and associated IMPACT: RESPECTF LYY~SUBMITTED: Lloyd Harrel City Manager rep4ddby: ~XName impso Titl anni g coordinator J Approv~ Nam - -Be ty , c can Title Executlive Director for Municipal Services/Economic Development Npiod No .._..7 1 f - Agenda Ilem__- es CITY of DENTONr TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Betty McKean, Executive Director for Municipal Services and Economic Development DATE: June 9, 1992 SUBJECT: Matching Grant for Park Development As you know, the City is now in contract with the F.D.I.C. to purchase 200 acres of land on Teasley Lane between Londonderry and Hobson. In order to expedite the development of the basic facilities, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has recommended that an application for a Local Park Fund matching grant be submitted to Texas Parks and Wildlife for the next review cycle. The deadline: for this application is July 31, 1992. The attached resolution authorizes the City to make application for these funds. The Parks and Recreation Department held two public meetings this month to receive input regarding the development of the South park. A conceptual Master Plan is being finalized. This long range plan will reflect the initial phase of development recommended for funding through this grant process. The Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission reviews applications twice per year, Therefore, notification on grant applications submitted in July, 1992, will occur in January, 1993. As stated in the Local Government Project Review Procedures, "Projects presented to the Parks and Wildlife commission will be scored with the criteria, rating factors, and points shown in the "Project Priority Scoring System". The priority rank of a project will depend on its scores in relation to scores of other projects under consideration. Funding of projects will depend on the availability of funds." 8171566.8200 D/PW METRO 434.2529 3~•r June 9, 1992 Page 2 The recommended priorities for projects include: d ix and n To provide a more ba nrntunities in the wider, area ,of outdoor recreation opp To provide a better geographic distribution of outdoor recreation opportunities in the project area? To maximize the use of funds for basic recreational opportunities, handicapped, low To provide improved / recreation zcup zens pin areas income, elderly, dor minority g orc tizen where these groups need improved oppties, To provide for needed recreational opportunities in those locales where differences between supply and demand are greatest, To improve water-related recreational opportunities where feasible, To improve cooperative efforts between recreational providers, other government entities, institutions, and the private sector. To preserve and protect identified natural reas$ open f spaces, and wetlands or recreational p p these criteria, it is the. opinion of staff that this Based on otential for matching grant funds. project has the p _0t y an AJJ003E5 ..w2=_D/Q........ N wio,i No ALL00253 q n~.lenri3 Vern... /qq~.5.~ RESOLUTION NO- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS DESIGNATING CERTAIN OF- FICIALS AS BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR, ACTING FOR, AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF DENTJN IN DEALING WITH THE TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE DEPART- MENT, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PARTICIPATING IN CERTAIN GRANT PROGRAMS; CERTIFYING THAT THE CITY OF DENTON IS ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE ASSIS- TANCE UNDER SUCH PROGRAMS; AND DEDICATING THE PROPOSED SITE FOR OUTDOOR RECREATION USES. WHEREAS, the United States Congress has passed the Land & Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (Public Law 88-578) for outdoor recreation purposes; and WHEREAS, the Texas Legislature has approved Parks & Wildlife Code, Section 13,309 authorizing the state of Texas, and its poli- tical subdivisions, to participate in the federal program estab- lished under said Public Law 88-578; and WHEREAS, the Texas Legislature has approved Parks & Wildlife Code, section 24,005 for the purpose of allowing the political subdivisions of the State of Texas to participate in the Texas Lo- cal Parks, Recreation & Open Space Fund; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is fully eligible to receive as- sistance under these programs; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is desirous of authorizing an of- ficial to represent and act for the City of Denton in dealing with the Texas Parks & Wildlife Department concerning these Programs; NOW, THEREFORE THE COUNCII, OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SaZIZ N I. That the City of Denton hereby certifies that it is eligible to receive assistance under these Programs. SECTION 11, That the City of Denton hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager to act for the city of Denton in dealing with the Texas Parks & Wildlife Department for the purposes of these programs, and the city Manager is hereby officially designat- ed as the representative in this regard. S,C I~NIll. The City of Denton hereby specifically autho- rizes the City Manager to make application to the 'rexas Wildlife Department concerning as a known park sitee "South That the Park" on t for i use to be in the City of Dent "South Park" site will be dedicated upon completion of the propused acquisition for public outdoor recreation purposes. Merida rte / ~ SECTION immed That this resolution shall become effective iately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ~ 1992. B0B CASTLEBERRy, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: Page 2 Ile SECTION IV. That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992• BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY '-s BY: L Page 2 . r F11nnd;a Nn.._9iS ".Qlb?. lot 1 It, RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE PARTICIPATION OF THE DENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT IN THE GRANT PROCESS FOR FUNDS ASSOCIATED WITH THE LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND AND LOCAL PARK FUND AS CONDUCTED BY THE STATE OF TEXAS THROUGH THE TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT. WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Department is responsible for the planning, organizing, and operation of all city recreation programs and the construction and maintenance of all City owned open space, parks, and cemeteries; and WHEREAS, we believe this grant application reflects sound funding principles on the part of the Parks and Recreation Department and the City of Denton/ and WHEREAS, the facility which will be developed will greatly impact the community's ability to participate in leisure recreation activities; and WHEREAS, we believe that funding this application would result in increased outdoor recreation opportunities for the citizens of Denton) BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PARRS AND RECREATION ADVISORY HOARD OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, states its enthusiastic support for and belief in the Parks and Recreation Department's effort to acquire needed Land and Water Conservation Funds or Local Park Funds for desired developm at South Park. D 1 on Gregor C m Tom J440, vice C a rman • CatherineBell, Board Member Note S al nq , LBoard Memb r~ Hurkley Hatxless, Board Member kmntla No.._.~~ -D/o_..._.. PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING IMP, 5:30 P.M., MONDAY, JUNE 15, 1992 - '_F.ZL-iu,JO~ SENIOR CENTER MEMBERS PRESENT: Tom Judd, Vice Chairman Catherine Bell Burkley Harkless Neta Stallings STAFF PRESENT: Betty McKean, Executive Director for Municipal Servicos and Economic Development Bob Tickner, Superintendent of Parks Alicia Mentell, Superintendent of Leisure Services Janet Simpson, Park Planning Coordinator Joy Hesch, Administrative Secretary GUESTS PRESENT: 10 Citizens from Neighborhood Adjoining the 200 Acre Park Site in South Denton I. MEETING CALLED TO ORD The meeting was called to order by Tom Judd, vice chairman, After the meeting was called to order, Tom presented a plaque to Catherine Bell in appreciation of her dedicated and distinguished service to the citizens of Denton as a member of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board from July, 1986, to July, 1992. This was Catherine's last meeting as a member of the Board. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM LAS E TRIG on a motion by Burkley Harkless, second of Neta Stallings, the minutes of the meeting of May 18, 1992, were approved as written. III. ACTION ITEMS A. Consider a conceptual waster plan for the development of the 200 acre South Park. (Janet Simpson) Janet began the discussion by stating that the department had been working hard for the last two months on the master plan for the development of the park. She provided a summary of the process and said the item was on the agenda for this meeting because the deadline for submission of the grant application to Texas Parks and Wildlife was July 31, 1992. A recommendation was needed from the Park Board to be able to proceed with she application. Janet said that two neighborhood meetings had been held at the Southmont Baptist Church to receive input from the neighbors for development of the site. The first meeting was held on June 4 with approximately 60 in Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting June 15, 1992 Page - 2 attendance. There was a strong indication that residents of the neighborhood would prefer passive activities such as open areas, picnic facilities, playgrounds, and trails. other activities such as athletic fields and the infrastructure were also discussed. At the second meeting on June 11, 30 were in attendance. Charts were provided for information which categorized activities, suggested at the first meeting as passive/active, gave estimates for construction Tcost, exas levParks el o and maintenance, e, grant ranking criteria by annual operation and maintenance costs, and citizen priority. The suggestions were further charted as unstructured activities, structured activities, water related activities, support facilities, landscaping/ site enhancements, and indoor facilities. Also listed on the charts were citizen concerns regarding traffic, drainage, and lighting issues, and a ban of alcohol usage in the parks. Again, support was indicated for picnic and playground activities. Janet referred to a draft budget which was similar to the one used in the application for Local Park Fund monies for the further development of North Lakes Park. Betty said the modified infrastructure costs are based on the ability to plat the property in a certain way and would require Planning and zoning approval. She said that its because first review, application modifications were made, and the some c i application was successful when resubmitted. Speaking to the "mix" of amenities shown on the proposal, s explained the department is trying to do the best job possible on the application for the South Park for a better chance of it being approved on the first submission. Janet said that she, Bob, and Betty had worked with Dalton Gregory, Board chair, all day Friday, June 12, on the budget to improve the chances of securing the grant on the first try. Tom said the proposed master plan seemed to be balancing act with what the citizens want along with what: the state ranks high. Janet referred tk: the conceptual drawing of the master plan which was developed using sugg made at the neighborhood meeting on dune 11. The concept located the entrance to the park opposite Santa Monica off Hobson Lane. The main difference from the original concept was the positioning of the recreation center and the tennis courts. The concept included dirt pathways through wooded areas a playground areas, sand volleyball, picnic program area, open play, unlighted athletic Yields, wildflowers, bandshell/ amphitheatre area, five parking areas, and retention ponds. i Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting June 15, 1992 9 Ltd/ / page - 3 Janet said the Engineering Department had indicated that improvements to Teasley would possibly occur in 1-1/2- be years, and at that time, curb-cuts could possibly included in the improvements. Janet indicated that a recommendation for retention ponds had been included because that type o plan high with the state when they are considering the grant applications. Janet said taek department the HobsonoLane of development like to neighborhood park type side of the acreovalage side with This will provide additional access Park Board app points into the park. She said that at the meetings trails t e citizens had indicated they wanted as many possible. The initial plans were to develop a mile of trail from Hobson Lane to Teasley Lane and to Londonderry. Betty told the Board it would be a question of policy regarding the type of trail to be developed. There seemed to be a nontroversy as to whether the trail should If the il is be a soft trail be used, butrduring a mountain bike could concrete. soft, possibly wet times, more people would not be able to use the trail. Bicycle use during bad weather would cause dangerous ruts and drive maintenance costs up• if concrete is used in the construction, the trail would be usable in all kinds of weather and would with ails strollersble for diverse populations such as and all other types wheelchairs, toddlers with tricycles, of bicycles. Not only does the concrete surface open the trail up more readily to the, handicapped, days of maintenance free surface on t!-he maximum nunmsb that asphalt the year , It had been expressed by citige deteriorates fand is or the then dangerous to walk or " aintonance wouldg bena particularly prime issue since an eight foot tcail would open up the whole park. The conceptual drawings indicated the development of is reand moved acres on t would he on the sout If side fence e were site the north side. . acted. open up the whole park, maintenance Vgula brie ing on As directed by the Board, Bob ga maintenance issues. Bob said the department was aware of the major concerns regarding maintenance when building new facilities. The maintenance n he divided basdiis i of into the classes would be prepared o classifications. 121 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting t)Itv..~ June 15, 1992 Page - 4 The classes were as follows. Class A Maintenance. Mowing - once every five working days days per once per day, 6 Litter control - week Restrooms - No less than once Per day Floral plantings - Two seasonal rotations Irrigation plantsband turf in needed luto maintain sh condition ~ C~,aB, g B..a+Ma i ntg~nC_~ Mowing - once every 10 working days Litter control - Serviced two times per week or as needed week Restrooms - serviced five times per Floral Plantings - only perennials or flowering trees/shrubs to mai Irrigation plantegrowth fornactivityimum ss t8 Mowing - usually once per month or every 20 working days per year Litter Control - Very low level, once or if reported Restrooms - No allyanot available have Floral Plantings wildflowers Irrigation - Not irrigated The Class A maintenance would 2 miledtrar tar entrance areas. The area alone the , maintenance. The would be maintained in the Class B type (see satt ched.ordinance). Thep esmaintained as timated annual l costs area Class A - $ 41490 Class B - 86,175 Class C - _ ~.94-3 Total $96,518 Tom asked that if the trail is concrete why would the maintenance cost $86,175• Bob responded that it will irrespective of the material of the trail., rgan additional sides of acres trailnwoulduba mowed rand lighting, edged, litter control, and policing. lor3ur;a ~dn pp Q/~ Farks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting yz June 15, 1992 Page - 5 The Following are other options which may be considered: Fence 200 acres with no development, and no public use until 1994 $ 21400 Fence 183 acres, develop 17 acres for $45,245 public use in 1994 Fence 175 acres, or develop 25 acres 0 with three public access areas $64,60 mma that Betty explained additional serious maintenance iw uld na usei.le The City opening p add funcuts, dingafor crews n Reequipmentcreation 1 notlhabe facing ve additional budget Nota .asked if part of the undeveloped property could be fenoe3. Bob replied that some type of created to discourage vehicle access. However, there would be posts associated probably not tleasenthe unused fences. The City would p piortions to a citizen, Janet said the cattle lease that s in is not a effect signiPioant would rvenue probably praduaere renewed since it i Janet summarized the master plan for the southern portion of the park as followst Hard hiking/biking trail - 1 mile Soft surface trail 1 mile (pedestrian only) - .a. playground area Picnic pavilion Picnic units (4) Sand volleyball Tennis Courts (2) Interior road and parking would ain lude a a playground, picnic adjacent inside the property. Citizen ooneerns and policy issues were: Lighting, pay-for-play at the tennis courts Lighting issues Construction materials for playground equipment Removal of fence What to do if grant not approved itial phases of en development Board dealing with nwould ph Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting Junu 15, 1992 Page - 6 include the items which had been left out. He wanted the citizens to realize that the complete development will take a long time, possibly several years. Catherine said. that she had not been at the neighborhood meeting3 but was concerned that, as had happened with the development of the Martin Luther King, Jr. Center and Pa,-^k, the Board would vote on things only to be cut dues to budget constraints. She wondered if that would happen in this development. Burkley asked what the source of funding would ba for the development. Betty said the City will attempt to use the $500,000 of Bond funds to obtain matching funds from the state. Without the grant, a lower level of development could possibly occur. If the City council decides to proceed with the grant application and it is subsequently not approved by the state, the Board will be asked whether to delay construction so the grant application can be submitted a second time. Neta asked if it would be possit,le to use half of the funds for development now and use the other half for leverage in applying for a matching grant. Betty said the $500,000 cannot be used before the grant is considered. Bob commented that if facilities are built prior to the grant they would not be considered. At this point, Tom asked the citizens who were present if they would like to make any comments and asked that they limit their comments to five minutes. An individual said he felt the park should be left in its natural stater that it would be ludicrous to mow the whole park, that it would create an ecological imbalance. He suggested that hundreds of trees should be planted. Janet responded that a mile had been set aside for soft trails and a mile would be paved to accommodate handicapped individuals, tricycles, and strollers. Further, she explained that one of the City's requirements as a part of improvements to a thoroughfare is for a paved sidewalk along the street. The Engineering Department: had indicated they would consider the paved trail as fulfilling the sidewalk requirement. Therefore, the trail would satisfy both the public access as well as engineering requirements. Betty said the city is trying to do as many of the citizen's wants as well as meeting grant requirements. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting 1A . June 15, 1992 r:--'=_~ 3.J~Z Page - 7 7 Every attempt is being made to both maximize the grant's successful considerations as well as the largest number of citizen priorities. Bob stated that once an activity is included and people. begin to use it, then maintenance and liability concerns arise. A citizen asked if a paved trail was one of the prerequisites for the state grant and if that is what would be presented to Council. She also asked where the soft trail and the paved trails would be located. Janet said grail would be from Hobson to Teasley to Jason, An individual said that she had understood at the last neighborhood meeting that only one playground was to be developed off Hobson Lane, but now the city was proposing a second playground on the north side. She said the new proposal would be splitting the money into two developments. She suggested that with two playgrounds the maintenance costs would be increased and the major playground development (Robert Leathers) would be jeopardized. She also stated her discomfort with dividing the dollars and providing a playground for use by the residents in the apartment buildings on the north side of the park since they were transients. Janet said the purpose of two playgrounds was to serve a large part of the citizenry in the area who may not have transportation to the playground on the south side of the park. At the last neighborhood meeting, some citizens had voiced a concern regarding a playground in their area. Neta stated that if two playgrounds were a problem, was it possible to locate one playground the north and of the park. Tom commented that at the neighborhood mestings concerns had arisen regarding the possible traffia congestion along Hok)son Lane due to the park entrance. He said that having two playground areas may help to alleviate some of the concerns by allowing access from more than one and of the park. A question was asked regarding when the final decision would be made about whether there would actually be the be locations donei after thea grant His received two final design playground (spring of 1994). k. Parks and Recreation Advisory Hoard Meeting 1}flt, _y,~, June 15, 1992 Page - 8 Staff was asked if the city always goes with the lowest bid. Bob said the lowest bid is accepted only if the bid conforms to specifications. He explained that we accept the lowest best bid. A question was asked about the timeframe for Phases II and III. Janet said that funding for further development, would probably have to come from future capital Improvement Programs that would be voted on by the citizens. David Glass expressed a concern that plans for athletic fields had the plan submitted. to know if the grant depended Betty agreed that while staff had noted the citizens' desires for playing fields, there was a concern that their inclusion might hurt the grant's chancew. She further explained that this was a staff judgement call because we had yet to complete the athletic fields under the existing park grant at North Lakes. She said staff was concerned that it might not look favorable to ask for more fields when the authorized ones had yet to b E ill. She also told him that, unfortunately, practice require nearly the same level of maintenance as league- play fields. Bob said the City already has a grant for ballfields at or Lakes lt the state a wou'id not rank highly another plan for athletic 1 At this point, Tom said the chair was open for a motion. mmi Meta mothat tualmaster plan and ainitialifacility the proposed p deVelased twith ra seconded oration, and the oration was pa B. consider a rosoluticn supporting a Texas Parks and Wildlife grant: application for development of the 200 acre south park. (Janet Simpson) Janet said the Boara, at its meeting on May 18, 1992, recommended that staff proceed with a matching grant application for the development of South Park. The grant application to formality and has to be included in resolution the ate the support of the Park Board. Catherine moved that the oard dadopt e aelopmentresolutio thon .:in support of the matching grant and the of 00 acre South motion was paased with a unanimous vote~otion, t f Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting A{y;:;r1a [""S= f. J, June 15, 1992 Page - 9 ~ ;,r•/~ J C. Consider a development plan for North Lakes Park. (Bob Tickner) Bob presented a drawing of the master plan for the development of North Lakes Park. He said that since notification of the award of $500,000 in matching grant., funds last November for athletic field development: at North Lakes, an archaeological survey has been completed. The project design is now being finalized and will be submitted to Texas Parks and Wildlife later this month for review. If there are not a lot of revisions, construction could possibly start in November. IV. Discussion Items A. Discuss civic center pool renovation. (Janet Simpson and Bob Tickner) Janet said that in 1991 the Park Board recommended a CIP project for renovation of the Civic Center pool. Discussions were held with Council regarding building an indoor/outdoor pool. subsequently, Council directed staff to look at what could be done in repairing the current pool. An architect was hired who presented three options. Council wanted more specifics on what was planned, and at Council's recent retreat, staff presented a report on proposals for a phased renovation. Janet reviewed the report with the Board. Phase 1A would be for critical mechanical repairs only and would cost approximately $294,600, Phase 1B would cover the construction of pool buildings, restaration of pool, equipment furniture, replacing wood and chain link fencing, eliminating two on-street parking lots and adding a 5o space parking lot in Civic Center Park, and the addition of a toddler pool. This phase will cost approximately $314,400 for an overall cost for Phase 1A and 1B of $609,000, Tom commented that he recalled Norm saying the pool piping system would not accommodate a six hour filtering system. Janet said that the new piping would be contained in the guttering eiystem. Janet continued that phase II would convert the existing pool into a zero depth pool, and Phase III calls for expansion of the pool facility with a new competitive pool in civic center Park. Janet said that at. the council retreat, Council had identified funding and instructed staff to do an architectural atudy for. Phase 1A. Staff will be sending Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting OM June 15, 1992 Page - 10 out Requests for Proposals soon with construction on Phase 1A to be started immediately after the current pool season ends. V. nfo gtional Items Betty said that the recruiting process for the director's position had begun. The announcement would close in August, and it is hoped that a new director would be selected by sometime in the fail. Alicia provide the Board with clippings from the Dallas Morning News regarding the free food program which had been established by the department with funding from the federal government. She said that over 300 lunches are being served daily. The date for the July meeting was discussed. Tom Judd said he would be unable to attend the meeting if it was held on the regularly scheduled date of JulY 20. Janot said that poasible agenda items would include After Schoct Action Site issues, alcohol usage in the parks, and possibly budge issues. The consensus of the Board was to schedule the next meeting for July 13. Tom said that as chairman of the Park Naming Committee he had veceived commitments from the following individuals to serve on the committee. They are Harold Perry, crane Hopkins, Mayor Castleberry, Linda Baddy, Loyce Wilson, and Popo Gonzales. VI. other, Issues consisting of items and concerns brought by citizens, staff, and Board members on which no action will be taken. VII. Aiourn on a motion by Neta Stallings, second of Burkley Harkless, the meeting was adjourned. AJJ003F7 June 18, 1992 IAtto /7y/7 IMPORTANT DATES AND DEADLINES June 4 and June 11 Neighborhood Meeting June 15 Park Board June 23 City Council July 31 Grant Application Due January it 1993 Cattle Grazing Lease Expires January 31, 1993 Grant Review Complete if Grant is Approved February, 1993 Archaeological Study is initiated, Beginning of Design Phase August, 1993 Archaeological study and Design Phase Completed November, 1993 Construction Phase Begins June, 1994 initial construction complete AtEfil j 'CITY t CIL _:COUN - '-T T . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1 a : ~ooo~o~anaa °D~~oo ~00~ti•y 4 r ' - y ~ C' - - i a AGENDA BACK-UP GIVEN TO COUNCIL ONLY 6-23-92 June 15, 1992 Edward J. Coomes, Jr., 809 Denton Denton, Texas 76201 Dr. Jean H. Schaake Chairperson, City of Denton Library In Care of College of Arts and Sciences University of North Texas Denton, Te.tas 76203 Dear Dr. Schaake; On Friday, June 12, 19920 I was informed indirectly that I have a conflict of interest in the matter of serving as a member of the City o2 Denton Library Hoard. The information came, indirectly, from the city manager, Mr, Lloyd Harrell. I remember some time ago asking whether or not I might have such a conflict and was told no, but I do not remember whom I asked, in any event, I do need to resign from the library board since there is now, apparently, a conflict, and, of course, I do not wish to compromise any work which the board does. The ground of the conflict is that my wife, Suzanne, works for the library. So please accept my resignation. I shall miss all of you on the boards you all have taught me a r very great deal and have been delightful colleagues. Mrs. Orr and Mrs. Poole also have taught me excellently, and I have enjoyed being with all of you. will you please convey my thanks and best wishes to all members of the board, as well as to Mrs. Orr and Mrs, Poole? Thank you, and best wishes to all of you in your future deliberations for the library and for our city. sincerely yours, Edward Js'Coomes, Jr. oci City Manager, Mr. Lloyd Harrell Library Director, Mrs. Joella Orr Mrs. Eva Poole Councilman, Dr. Harold Perry File f ' ~Y June 9, 1992 To, Mayor Castleberry and City Council Members; This is to inform you that as of the end of my 2nd term as planning and zoning commissioner S will not consider serving a 3rd term, Thank you for the opportunity to serve my community and fellow man in such a noteworthy position. It has been a great learning experience as well as an enjoyable one. If t can be of futher assistance to the council or city please call me. Thank you very much. R spectfuD y yours IV 41%.- rA4yyV, Fran Morgan U , CITY OF DENTON BOARD APPOINTMENT INFORMATION NAXE --LY-nom /J ADDRESS PHONE NO. 230 Crisi /~l r9t~c~ F'y7- s CITY STATE ZIP CODE NAME nOF EMPLOYER yn'` F1fh;Gll2 h! 3i ADDRESS ~O~F~ EMPLOYER PHONE N0, 4,11 16! I G'011 D2~ - - CITY SrATS GIP CODE _1rrni7jAl r~-- -71oZ0 L OCCUPATION C g j C F A L 0 'r HAVE YOU PRIOR SERVICE ON A CITY BOARD? r IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBEt NAME OF CITY t WOULD YOU HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON ANY BOARD? IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBc' , T__--_ - - ON WHICH BOARD DO YOU WISH TO SERVE/? t0b 12L_. STATEMENT OF APPLICANT1 Ica f1 I~GC~r J. _4*1 ON 7t} rlti2~ i~0~151kY /~)f}20 T,t(,1.1, I~~ n~~G~Rt.ui T'/_. 7n ShLfL!~ 70Er13~ J ~ilr? 4n ,.h17(fjs ~tk'lliT rJf2I7t,r~ ~cuil~, I~ rb nlf .,Z!!( tifAS C~ DATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICAA'! rlfCi~ CtF' LI`i Wile R4~1 ,~ti rllL,n , BOARD MEMBER ATTEND CE POLICX It Is the policy of the City of Deaton City Council that Members of the varlouS City Boards and commissions be removed from office for lack of attendance at the )arlaisa meetings of the Boards and Commission. Members may be removed on the following basist 1, RecularMegtjjgs. Board Members may be removed from office for three trnexcused absences during the course of one year and/or lack of attendance at 509 of the number of regular meetings in the year, Sggc al Call9~~1$e4i~g3~ Board Members may be removed from office for lack of attendance at 509 of the number of Special Called Meetings in ono year, An unexcused absence is defined as an absence for which no advanced notification is givetu and/or as determl.ned by the Chairman of the affected Board or Commission, - - _ y..,....._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OFFICE USE ONLYt TERN OF APPOINTMENT t BEGINNING ENDING THrS APPLICATION MUST BE PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL MEMBER'S IN EXECUTIVE SESSION, AND 90 ACTION WILL BE TAKEN UNTIL THE SECOND MEETING FOLLOWING THE PRESENTATION, CITY OF DENTON BOARD APPOINTMENT INFORMATION ADDRESSSj J PHONE NO. CITY STATE ZIP CODE _ NAME OF EMPLOYER ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER PHONE NO, CITY STATE ZIP CODE lar"aig-D S.oparY aoF'~s~ioc OCCUPATION - HAVE YOU PRIOR SERVICE ON A CITY BOARD? __-A/v s IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE1 NAME OF CITYi WOULD YOU HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON ANY BOARD? 0 IF YES, PLEAgb DESCRIBEr ON WHICH BOARD DO YOU WISH TO SERVL'? ( s rr,S~jy STATEMENT OF APPLICANTt ~dD ~q~ pR~,t ,x p Y~,i ~N TN a DATE SIONATURE OF APPLICANT BQARD ME1fBER A~ENDAuCE POLIO it is the pollcy of the City of Denton city council that Members of the various City Boards and Commissions be removed from office for lack of attendance at the various meetings of the Boards and commission, Members may be removed on the following baaisr r, R~9+l1ar Meerlnae. Board Members may bu removed from office for three une&used absences during the course of one year end/or lack of attendance at 50% of'the number of regular meetings in the year. 2, SOBOLaI Celled Meat+acs Hoard Members may be removed from office for lack of attendance at 50% of the number of special called Meetings In one year. An unexcused absence is defined as an absence for which no advanced notification Is given and/or as determined by the Chairmen of the affected Board or Commission. OFFICE USE ONLYt TERM OF APPOINTMENTi BEOINNINO BNDINO THIS APPLICATION MUST BE PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL MEMBERS IN EXECUTZYE SESSION, AND 90 ACTION WILL BE TAkEN UNTIL THE SECOND HEETZNO FOLLOWZHO THE PRESENTATION. CITY OF DENTON BOARD APPOINTMENT INFORMATION ~co0~ t~,r~,yaA~rn A6 4 _ 3~7~ 79icf ADDRESS PHONE NO, QPN7?~ 7X CITY _ 7 G Z_ O STATE LIP CODE NAME OF EMPLOYER w ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER PHONE N0, CITY STATE ZIP\CODE 3it+C - r~CQ0l1Nr/NS - ~K4.C11.~~ 1 OCCUPATION J NAVE YOU PRIOR SERVICE ON A CITY BOARD? IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBEt NAME OF CITYt - WOULD YOU HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON ANY BOARD? IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE: ON WHICH BOARD DO YOU WISH TO SERVE? STATEMENT OF APPI; ICANT o /C.I,q ~e L/.Q d~P 1/t' G~ x Nr c T DATE LS ATURE OF APPLICANT DOA.k,D MEMBER ATTEatn~CE POLICY It Is the policy of the City of Denton City Council that Members of the various City Boards and Commissions be removed from Office for lar.'k of attendance at the various meetings of the Boards and Commission, Members may be removed on the following baeiat RAQUIRC Meetings, Board Members may be removed from office for three unexcused absencos during the course of one year and/or lack of attendance at 50% of the number of regular msotings In the year, ?•atecia! Called N..~+nas• Board Members may be removed from office for lack of eetondance at 50% of the number of Special called Meetings In one year, An unsxoused absence is defined as an absence for which no advanced notification is given and/or as determined by the Chairman of the affected Board or commission, o d OFF-W;- 88 OHLYi TERM OF APPOINTMENTI BEOINNINf1 ENDINti THIS APPLICATION MUST BE PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL MEMBERS IN EXECUTIVE SESSION, AND NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN UNTIL THE SECOND NEETINO FOLLOWING THE PRESENTATION. CITY OF DENTON BOARD APPOIMTMSNT INFORMATION NAME ADDRESS PHONE N0. CITY STATE ZIP COD NAME OF EMPLOYER ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER PHONE NO, 0 \j CITY STATE ZIP CODE OCCUPATION lS 5 ofh k~U K l\ p( r- HAVE YOU PRIOR SERVICE ON A CITY BOARD? N~ IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE? _ NAME OF CITYi WOULD YOU HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON ANY BOARD? IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE: ON WHICH BOARD DO YOU WISH TO( SERVE? f"L•k6 &Jul STATEMENT OF APP? ZCANT i r ~y3~~ ~5 ti~ Awl ~1^ l ~r r, a'4c Du C -e 1 DATE G 16 y z SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT !°•5111„,,. MEMBER ATTIS WQr FOLD It is the policy of the City of Denton city council that Members of the various City Boards and Commissions be removed from office for lack of attendance at the various meetings of the Boards and Commission. Members may be removed on the following basis: 1. g¢Aular,.MO• tnaa, Board Members may be removed from office for three une.ecused absences during the course of one year and/or lack of attendance at 60% of'the number of regular meetings In Cho year. 2. Ul sq,l31_4ellled Meetinae Board Members may be removed from office for lack of nttandanoe at 601 of the number of Speoia! Called Mestinga in one year. An unexcused absence is defined as an absence for which no advanced notif.ticatlon is given and/or as determined by the Chairman of the affected Board or Commission. OFFICE USE ON,GYt TERN OF APPOZIlrMENTt BEGINNING ENDZNO THIS APPLICATION MUST BE PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL MEMBERS IN EXECVTIVE SESSION, AND NO ACTION WILL BE TAKE?! UNTIL THE SECOND MEETING FOLLOWZNG THE P"S,tNTATION. BOARO APPOrNTxaNT rNFaRMASIOx NAME ¢t i ADDRESS r - t3 _ hview tt~1~ PHONE NO, CITY, STATE - ZIP CODE NAME OF EMPLOYER ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER - PHONE No O. CITY o STATE ZIP CODE OCCUPATION I;~ N HAVE YOU PRIOR SERVICE ON A CITY BOARD? IF YES, PLWAL,'~,' DESCRIBEr NAME OF CITY: WOULD YOU HAVE A CONFLICT -OF INTEREST ON ANY BOARD? IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBEi r; ON WHICH BOARD DO YOU NISM TO SERVE? STATEMENT OF APPLICANT:, t --~LL DATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT G e C m B438D MEMBER arnew C It I itysBoards andbpmwis;ion Cit Of Denton CJt s be removed from offigntfor that Aec Bvt various meetings of the Boards and Comm.iaslon. k. attendance at the following basis Members may be removed on the 1. 8lanlar Mue e,,,, ---.~,.a~• Board Members may be removed from office for three unommmod absences during the course at one year and/or lack of attendance At SOf of the number of regular Meetings in the year. 24Sa1 e.lled xse Board Members may be removed from office for look of attendance at 9o1 of the number of Special Called Meetings in one year. An unexcused absence is defined as an absence for which no advanced notification is given and/or As determined by the Chairman of the attected Board or cosasission. TERM OF APPOINTNAWTI 4 - -y eeOINNIHG BNDING~~~~'""-""`"' 1 THIS APPLICAXION NUSr ea PRSSENTSD TO THE COUNCIL NdMeaRS IN exaCUTIV6 1eBSION, AND NR ACTION HILL Ba TAxo UNTIL THa SSCOND MtfBTING FOLLONINO TH6 PRaedNTATION. CITY OF DENTON BOARD APPOINTMENT INFORMATION NAME - - ADDR,"SS I Pxnxe PHONE C~ xo.L. )rZL9 .rcRrrf it ~ STATE - - ZIP CODE, NAME OF EMPLOYER ~E~f'Mm 01I ADDRESS OF E,Y/pIL,pY -L./✓ ~ g p; A,; ~r+-_ ,~~J~L~1 L ~ !'I r H /j~~ s J' / 4-R y~= PHONE NO. CITY - STATE ZIP CODE OCCUPATION HAVE YOU PRIOR SERVICE ON A CITY BOARD? IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE: - NAME OF CITY: WOULD YOU HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON ANY BOARD?- A/p~F f~jq~t W IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE t ON WHICH BOARD 00 YOU WISH TO SERVE? A dI_L1 ~~.._CE STATEMENT OF APPLICANT: DA 71S 2, --C~~~ ,r~ tee, a✓ .t~..,ri,_~+.i l7 ~,~'~y' ~-~~=....444!!!!!! ..•~~~"~II..~TTT~~ liL, 1 I SIGNATURE OF AppLICAN-21 It Is th ill y Of Q0 C f Denton City Council that Members of the various City Boards and Commissions be remove(i from office for lack of attendance at the various meetings of the Boards and Commission, Members may he removed on the following basie: 11 •~L@9Gdlt4~• Board Members may be removed from office for three unexcused absenees during the course of one year and/or lack of attendance at 10% of the number of regular meetings in the year, lack year. 2. UcolAd cettgp ofothe umber of Special Called Msetings office one An unsxcueed absence is defined as an absence for which no advancod notiflcltion is given and/or as determined by the Chairman of the Affected Board or Commission, _ O,rFICE USE ONLYr TERM OF APPOINTMENT: THIS APPLICATION Nusr BEIPRNEIszNT8'D TO Th'E COUNCIL MEMBERSNOIN EXECUTIVE. S,SSSION, AND NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN UNTIL THE SECOND NEETINO FOLLOWINO THE PR6'SENTATION. B(J.Vt11 APPOIXTMBa'T INrORMA11D7il _jo WATSOVr-_ NAME o~ IL05 ABBOT'S LANE (1117) - 566-0570 Home PHONE NO. ADDRESS TEXAS 76205 F? : ,DENTON - - CITY STATE ZIP CODE HCA DENTON COMhfUNITY HOSPITAL SPECIAL CARE COORDINATOR - INTENSIVE CARE AND PROGRESSIVE CARE UNIT NAME OF EMPLOYER . (617) - 896_7001 Work 207 N. BONNIE BRAE ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER PHONE NO. TEXAS 70201 DFNTON STATE ZIP CODE CITY REGISTERED NURSE - SPECIAL. CARE COORDINATOR OCCUPATION HAVE YOU PRIOR SERVICd ON A CITY BOARD? IF YES, PLEASE DEgCRIBEt~_ r! NAME Or CITYi ' WOULD YOU HAVE A CONFLICT OF ZHTEREST ON ANY BOARD? NO IT YES, PLEASE DESCRSBI!___._. ON WHICH BOARD DO YOU WISH TO SEAVE? Denton Housing Authorit Board andLa' 1 ' um n Sevice Ad i o Lo i e I believe it H's Nmpur.fanf O c: n_ r~~uremTot. tee STATEMENT OF APPLICANTI community in which ou live. I feelkkI am well:gu_a1, £ild to rnnhr~hura alio' auoono`lm eeineeresAn to MCON.be O'Id ~re°wee aea a o?dt~iee~pujXceaoi m} c6mmun DATR 06-10-92 SXGXASDRE or APPLICANT q 4)06'rio It is the police of the Ci>zy 0 Denton City rlouncil that Xaabars of the various City vari uaameetings*1the loarderandvcommission do Members cway be removed on the following baalsl 1 AggUAAX NgaelAgm, Board Members may be removed from office for three un so! the races during regular u reetings n in year and/or lack of attendanve cu 1 gAtlial Board Members say be removed from office for .lack of attendanae at So% of the number of special Called Meetings in one, year. An unexoused absence is defined as an absence tar which no advanced notification is given and/or as determined by the chairman of the affected Board or Commission. *f~ I would bo pleaeed to serve on any board or committee-deemed app .tp j+,te. r rr..r rr rrrrr.+rrrr err rrr~.r•'rr.rrr...+..rr.wrrrrr.r..rrrrr rr . r err OrrrcE USB 0?ILT I TsRM or APPOINTMBNTt utQINXINO siiaaxo J I'WZS APPLICATION ACTION YII'-1x BB TAXV O T LETHS SECOND MNNTINGEIOBLLONZNOtTNBUPRESENTATION. AND 1. - ih :M t("JITYI- J-~ €li-COUNCILI (L 3 - R T T- TT: a -T TT- { TT- ~~~Qi14 r Opp~04 }top ~ y f p0 . -a c, T L7 O oy ~ p _ . OpOCi~JCQuLdn~~~ - ' . . i : - It I . C .U CITY of CENTONi TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING IAcKlNNr Y - % DEN70N, TEXAS 76201 _ MEMORANDUM TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager Sandra Whiter Municipal Judge l~ ()peratione FROM. }Sarlan L. Jeffersonr Director of Treasury June 19, 1992 DATE: SUBJECT: UPDATE ON COURT pROCEDURES date report regarding the This is the third municipal Court 1 es in the court in which Judge White and s reported e the solutions recent changes have reviously collaborated. Since we have p issues this report will only address unresotem report our item by to several issueuantifi.able progress data, and those with q ,j is as follows. irc3ment/Recommendation: No formal charging 7udiciel Requ document needed. Taint on Class C filing of a sworn comp The ail arrests was to af'rnmplaintiriled dig misdemeanor on-site roblem of having however, there whrens the p post bond. in situatir dasebecauthe se De/ heahas bmust be een unable to post could within a few Y are examining this They could be released on PR Bond if be found. The prosecutor and the judge problem and solutions thereto. There may be ability to irement/Recommer,detion: process, but 26 Judicial Requ incorporate an affidavit into tickeistratel.g would still be signed in front of Mag You that it is not etas: Wo previously 'the affidavit to Y orate the process Of reviewingtthe proof practical w it# we are in the process. However, ro ased in the ticket will, of a new ticket. The changes p p 817/5668200 D/Fw mETRO 434.2529 Memo to Lloyd V, Harrell June 19, 1992 Page 2 among other things, inform Defendants not to report to the Municipal Court Clerk's office before seven days of the citation issue date and no later than twenty days of the citation issue date. This will reduce frustration from Defendants who report to the Municipal Court Clerk's office before their formal complaint is filed. We also anticipate a reduction in the number of dismissals because of this problem. 3. Judicial Requirement/Recommendation: Magistrate/Judge will make self available at certain times for Peace Officer, Traffic, and clerk affidavits, in a location to be determined such as the Courtroom or, preferably, an area accessible to a word processor, to generate warrants at time of PC finding to get backlog done or redone. Magistrates will make additional f time available for processing and PC determinations. Part- time Judges schedules must be considered in light of their other private practices. Statu,_g: We are complying with this recommendation, The current schedule is Wednesday from 2:00 pm to 4+00 pm., and on Friday for 3100 pm to 5;00 pm. Previously, we also scheduled a Monday session from 7:00 am to 9:00 am, The Mo:ieRy session was not productive and was cancelled. We have also unsuccessfully experimented with extending the hours of the Wednesday and Friday sessions. The affidavit signing process has also generated more staff and Judge time outside of the two (2) hours signing time periods because of the word processing capability. The affidavits cannot be reviewed in Court, nor warrants produced due to the tremendous volume of affidavits to he signed. The UNT officers have begun to appear after the Judge and Chief Jackson met. The backlog is almost complete a;. hopefully, this will enable the process to return to norm4-, one last note, more affidavits have been found insufficient to establish probable cause due to careless errors and indifference on the part of some officers. Chief Jez has indicated that he wanted to be advised of officer indifference and incompetence. He has also requested that Legal provide a section in their field operations manual for training of new recruits and those lacking sufficient PC skills, 4. Municipal Judge/Staff Recommendation: During the period from April 15, 1992 through May 4, 1992, that the Municipal court have an "amnesty" on all citations. d Memo to Lloyd V. Harrell June 19, 1992 Page 3 Status: The amnesty program waived the warrant fee and/or late fee on more than 6,000 cases. The results of the program is as follows: • 187 cases were paid in full. (Revenue $12,221.50) • 20 defendants elected to take a driver safety course. (Revenue $200.00) • 6 defendants paid only fifty (50%) percent of their fine. (Revenue $217.00) The response rate and revenue was less than the $30,000 we enpected. of i our might citati onsd have been at a r duced level for more than a program, the general public TV. A not t aware m that the the city amnesty renewed its efforts to enforce citations with warrants. Since the conclusion of the amnesty program, an aggressive warrant drive has been initiated. In this effort, the Police Department has served 311 warrants and collected $34,084. - In addition to the items listed above, I would also like to point out that the 1991/92 Municipal Court revenue projection is less than year'sfigure+s years should 9exceed the 1990-91 fiscal year figures, iteis apparent that the revenue will be far below 1988-89 and 1989-90 figures. To increase the collection of unpaid judgments, the Municipal Judge has instituted a new Judge's docket. Defendants that enter a plea of guilty or no contest shall be required to pay at least fifty percent (50%) of the total judgment. Defendants are then scheduled for the Judge's docket to make arrangements to pay the remaining balance. If they cannot pay the fifty (504) percent up front, they are immediately scheduled for the Judge's Docket. Ditring each docket, we collect from $600 to $1,000 in revenue. Th;s is substantially more than the amount of revenue collected at indigenvy hearings, and this docket has increased staff, Judge, and Bailiff courtroom time. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact either Judge White or myself. HJ:af Attachment AFF002CC REVENUE HISTORY OF MUNICIPAL COURT (MCT) 4 Of iREV 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 Y FAR OCTOBER $ 105,024 $ 101,616 $114,516 $78,301 68,4 NOVEMBER 86,400 102,398 95,435 62,962 65.9 DECEMBER 78,874 93,190 64,994 67,673 104,1 JANUARY 97,197 111,625 59,602 71,187 119,4 FEBRUARY 87,431 104,882 76,411 67,857 88,3 MARCH 101,798 103,305 74,714 99,425 133,0 APRIL 96,253 102,211. 70,306 86,242 122,7 MAY 112,643 105,414 53,881 87,801 162.9 TUNE 90,771 113,441 53,096 nLY 920028 116,155 59,411 3 AUGUST 103,570 105,524 62,787 :;EPTEMBER 87,337 102,929 74,191 'T'OTALS $1,139,326 $11262,690 $859,744 AAA00131/12 e:Wpdocslmwpp ` HANDOUT TO COUNCIL 6.23.92 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, C014- PLYING WITH THE ORDER FOR INFORMATION BY REGION 6 OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, AS CONTAINED IN DOCKET NO, VI-91-26411 AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Denton discharges effluent under the au- thority of NPDES Permit No. TX0047180, issued by Region 6 of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)1 and WHEREAS, under the authority of the Clean Wat+•r Act, the EPA has initiated a Municipal Water Pollution Prevention (MWPP) pro-. gram) and WHEREAS, to further the purposes of the MWPP, Region 6 of the EPA has issued an order (Docket No. VI-91-2641), requesting that the City issue this resolution; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS. S TJrgN- I That, in compliance with the Municipal Water Pollution Prevention Order For Information (Docket No. VI-91-2641), dated September 5, 1991, from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), requiring the completion and submission of an Environmental Audit for the Denton Wastewater Treatment Plant prior to July 1 of each year, the Clity Council informs EPA Region 6 that the following actions will be or have been taken to maintain compliance with NPDES Permit No. TX0047180: 1, That it has reviewed the Municipal Water Pollution Prevention Environmental Audit Report (attached to this resolution as Exhibit A). y' .2. That it has taken the following actions necessary to maintain permit requirements contained in NPDES Permit No. TX0047180, effective November 25, 1991: a. Completed an Uprating and Preliminary Design Report for the Dent( 1 Wastewater Treatment Plants b. Completed the Detailed Design and Specifica- tions for the Construction of Phase I (13 MGD) and Phase II (15 MGD) improvements required for permit compliance) c• Approved an Engineering construction services Contract with Alan Plummer and Associates to begin construction of the necessary improve- ments at, the Denton Wastewater Treatment Plant. ~i1 3. That it will consider approval of an 1992-97 Capital Improvement Plan and Annual Operating Budget that will increase rates appropriately in FY 1993 and in FY 1994 to fund the operation and capital expense of approxi- mately $9.18 million for Phase I improvements necessary for permit compliance. SECTION II. That this resolution shall become effective imme- diately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992• BO RRYB CASTLEBE, MAYOR PL ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: - APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: PAGE 2 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM r. 1 ~ 1997 J~7\/v~r(~~ ~•ti~1~•r1~''(I ~~iiiL~l''~i'•'1ry' S r"'.•;'~'' c~.''la ~i: (Y~1~1 ~ 1 (j'y'. i.. . yr A' t+ iiaZ it S. PROPOSED " Oodlu'ded to Quality ""orvico - 1993 - 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN CASH REQUIREMENTS ELECTRIC UTILITIES X 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT YEAR 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 TOTAL NUMBERS CATEGORY 1 POWER PRODUCTION ADDITIONS $0 $1,200 $10,000 $8,000 $0 $19,200 2 POWER PRODUCTION REPLACEMENT 45 130 80 0 0 255 3 OVERHEAD EXTENS/IMPROVES 331 396 332 346 594 11999 4 UNDERGROUND EXTENS/IMPROVES 125 950 1,000 926 820 3,821 5 DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS 220 263 276 289 304 1,352 • 6 METERS 98 113 144 155 166 676 7 LOAD MANAGEMENTPROGRAM 25 30 35 40 45 175 8 DISTRIBUTION SUBSTATIONS 298 269 329 914 67 1,877 9 STREET LIGHTING 190 214 261 337 296 ) 1,298 10 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 164 379 205 261 255 1,264 11 TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 228 242 251 258 293 1,272 12 GAS PIPE LINE 2,000 0 0 0 0 2,000 13 RIGHT-OF-WAY/FACIL PURCHASES 10 90 0 60 0 160 14 OFFICE EQUIP, COMP, FURN, SYS MAP 192 94 314 65 46 701 16 BUILDINGS; CENTRAL DISPATCH 0 3,500 2,300 0 0 5,800 16 COMMUNICATIONS AND CONTROL 100 346 85 fit 191 783 17 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENT 28 30 31 33 33 155 18 ECONOMIC CONDUCTOR REPLACEMENT 0 23 0 0 0 23 19 OVER TO UNDER CONVERSIONS 330 2,646 360 375 380 4,090 20 MISCELLANEOUS, OTHER 460 480 .480 480 480 2,400 '?•asl 5/8/921155 TOTALS $4,664 $11,394 $16,483 $12,590 $3,970 $49,301 `fie ~ 1993 - 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN CASH REQUIREMENT WATER UTILITIES x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT YEAR 1993 1994 1995 19911 1997 TOTAL NUMBERS CATEGORY 1 NEW WATER PLANT [TRANS LINE $276 41 4,$72 $4,160 $9,796 $18,5994 2 BOOSTER STATION 3 ELEVATED STORAGE 400 1,301 1,099 0 0 2,800 4 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE 1,522 778 1,333 669 686 41988 5 REPLACEMENT WATER LINES 429 677 526 480 460 2,592 6 FIELD SERVICES REPLACE WATERLINES 100 101 100 100 100 501 7 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER LINES 50 ~50 11610 100 1,250 500 8 OVERSIZE WATER LINES 100 9 TAPS, FIRE HYDS, AND FIELD EQUIP 158 212 231 259 331 1,191 10 LABORATORY IMPROVEMENTS 16 16 33 20 4 89 11 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 146 56 146 69 1 /5 592 12 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 21 1 31 1 0 64 13 OFFICE FURNITURE/EQUIPMENT 38 15 9 19 9 90 14 MISCELLANEOUS 0 85 271 10 0 366 e 15 OZONATION DISINFECTION 0 166 1,665 2,490 1,046 5,376 16 TEASLEY LANE WATERLINE 842 0 0 0 0 842 5/819211,68 $4,297 $3,799 $9,871 $11,174 $12,977 $42,118 T yA 1993 - 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN WASTEWATER UTILITIES X 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT YEAR 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 TOTAL NUMBERS CATEGORY 1 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IMP $70160 $1,830 $200 $80 $80 $9,350 2 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EXP 0 0 0 0 2,440 2,440 3 LIFTSTATION IMPROVEMENTS 57 31 42 234 25 389 4 COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE 478 1,286 820 870 922 4,376 5 REPLACEMENT SEWER LINES 814 851 495 480 '180 3,120 6 DEVELOPMENT PLAN ;SEWER LINES 250 250 250 250 250 1,250 7 OVERSIZE WASTEWATER LINES 100 100 100 100 100 500 8 INFILTRATION/INFLOW 100 190 100 100 0 400 9 TAPS AND FIELD EQUIP 45 50 31 52 144 322 10 LABORATORY IMPROVEMENTS 60 68 28 60 12 228 11 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 70 215 186 89 126 686 12 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 34 32 6 5 1 78 13 OFFICE FURNITURE/EQUIPMENT 4 0 2 12 59 85 14 MISCELLANEOUS 0 3 0 0 0 3 TOTAL $9,172 $4,824 $2,260 $2,332 $4,639 $23,227 51819212:0 t4 1993 - 1997 CAPITAL IMF loWr MENTS PLAN CASH REQUIREIVIL,NT COMMUNITY SERVICES (s x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT YEAR 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 TOTAL NUMBERS CATEGORY 1 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT $30 2 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT $6 ~0 $54 $0 $90 3 OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT f 5 0 0 15 4 MOBILE' EQUIPMENT 6 6 6 6 6 8 7 32 5 BOND ISSUES 09 228 422 393 431 1563 630 500 912 1,000 607 3649 6 MISC. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 10 13 9 7 LANDFILL CONSTRUCTION 8 10 49 8 LANDFILL MAINTENANCE 18 3 38 8 35 1 3, 36 200 13 0 21 1 3422 9 RECYCLING PROGRAM EQUIPMENT 126 10 MISCELLANEOUS 0 0 0 p 0 p 76 125 85 725 75 1086 6/8/92 11:53 - $908 $1,103 $4,669 $2,261 $1,151 $10,032 UTILITY UEPART4rNT ANTICIPATED BOND SALES x 1000) Total Electric Water Wastewater S. Waste DraJnage F Y Bond Bond Bond Bond Bond Bond Ending Sales Sales Sales Sales Sales Sales 1991 0 0 0 0 0 0 1992 ' 4,400 0 0 4,400 0 0 1993 4,450 0 0 4,250 200 0 1994 10,625 7,250 0 3,250 125 0 1995 24,350 12,000 8,000 1,250 3100 0 1996 19,250 8,600 9,600 1,250 0 0 1997 14,750 0 11,250 3600 0 0 Total $73,425 $27,750 $28,750 $13,500 $3,425 $0 ' Not fnciuded In Totals. UTILITY SYSTEM BOND FUND ANALYSIS x 1000) Prior CIP New CIP F Y Beginning Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Interest Ending Ending Balance Sold Avaliable Used Used Earned Balance 1991 17,843 0 17,643 0 1,646 4,942 10,481 tiVs:;9AA 1912 13,374 0 17,774 0 3,700 2,437 10,741 1993 12,285 4,260 16,635 700 12,247 2,503 3,156 1994 3,194 10,700 13,894 0 5,826 7,731 1,287 1996 1,132 21,375 2.2,607 0 9,830 13,066 1,402 19% 903 22,350 23,263 0 14,602 9,365 973 1997 721 14,750 15,471 50 16,324 718 368 1993 - 1997CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ~80MD CURRENT AID -IN TOTAL _ FUND REVENUE CONSTR - OTHER M X 1000) ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT 93 $4,864 9.87% $2,198 6,93% $2,527 15.23% $40 17.47% $99 12f32% 94 11,394 23.11% 71541 23.780/a 3,651 22.00% 40 17.470/a 162 21.150ia 95 16,483 33.43% 12,760 40,23% 3,528 21.260/a 49 21.400/a 146 19,o6oio 96 12,590 25,54% 8,942 28,20% 3,395 20.460/a 50 21.83/0 203 26.60% 97 3,970 s.o50/o _273_ o.86% _3,491 21.04% 50 21.83% 156 20,370/0 $49,301 $31,714 $16,592 $229 $766 WATER DEPARTMENT 93 $4,297 10,20% $3,122 8.76% $1,042 m2oo/o $50 13.37% $83 25.000/a 94 31799 9.026/o 2,465 8.91% 1,239 21.64% 60 16.040/a 35 10.54% 95 91871 23.44% 8,488 23.78% 1,296 22.64% 50 13.37% 37 11.14% 96 11,174 26.53% 9,984 27.98% 1,073 18.74% 70 IS.720la 47 14.16% 97 12,977 Sam 11,628 32.58% 1,075 18.78% 144 38,6oo/o 130 39,16% $42,118 $35,687) $5,725- $374 $332 WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT 93 $9,172 39.49% $8,905 48.170/a $210 4.77% $28 21.88% $29 13.680/0 94 4,824 20,77% 31326 17.99% 11400 31.eo0/o 30 23.44% 68 32.64% 95 2,260 9.73% 1,242 6.721/0 988 22440/a 12 9,380/0 18 8,810/0 96 2,332 10.04% 1,318 7.130/0 934 2121% 30 23.44% 50 23.92% 97 4,639 19.97% 3,696 mom _ 871 19.78% _ 28 21.88% 44 21.06Vo $23,227 $18,487 -$4,403 $128 $209 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 93 $908 9.05% $665 9.529b $233 9.og% $0 NIA $10 2.060/0 94 1,103 1 o 99% 600 8.69% 503 19.63% 0 NIA 0 0.000/0 95 41669 46.64% 4,112 68.88% 482 18,81% 0 NIA 75 15.46% 96 2,201 21.94% 1,000 14.32% 801 31.25% 0 N/A 400 82.47% 97 1,151 11.47% 607 8,69% 544 21.23% 0 NIA 0 0.000/0 $10,032 $6,984 $2,563 $0 $485 5/8/92 11,97 Pri _ 1993 - 1997CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES BOND CURRENT AID-IN TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER x 1000 1993 ELE $4,864 25.28% $2,198 14.76% $2,527 62.99010 $40 33.90% $99 44.800/0 WTR $4,297 22.33% $3,122 20.97% $1,042 25,97% $50 42,37% $83 37.56% WW $9,172 47.67% $8,905 59,81% $210 5.23% $28 23,73% $29 13,12% CSR 908 4.72% $.665 4.47% 233 5.81% $0 0.00% $10 4,52% $19,241 $14,890 $4,012 $118 $221 1994 ELE 11,394 53.95% 71541 54.13% 3,651 53.76% 40 30.77% 162 61,13% WTR 3,799 17.99% 21465 17.69o/o 11239 18.24% 60 46.15% '35 13.21% WW 4,824 22.84% 3,326 23.87% 1,400 20.61% 30 23,08% 68 25.66% CSR 1,103 5.22% UQ 4.31% 503 7.40% Q 0.000/0 Q 0.000/0 $21,120 $13,932 $6,793 $130 $265 1995 ELE 16,483 49.62% 12,760 47.97% 3,528 56.o5% 49 44.14% 146 62.9o% WTR 9,871 29.66% 8,488 31.91% 1,296 zo.59% 50 4505% 37 13.41% WW 21260 6.79% 1,242 4.67% 9B8 15.70% 12 1o.813% 18 6.52% CSR 4,B69 14.03% 4.112 1546% 4482.. 7.66% Q 0.00% Z5_ 27.17% $33,283 $26,602 $6,294 $111 $276 1996 ELE 12,590 44,49% 8,942 42,09% 3,395 54.73% 50 33.33% 203 2 ooo/o WTR 11,174 39.49% 9,984 47,0095 1,073 17.30% 70 46.67% 47 6,71% WW 2,332 8.24% 1,318 6.20% 934 15.o8% 30 20.00% 50 7.14% CSR 2201 7.78% LQQQ 4.71% 8Q 12.9130 Q 0,000A !Q.Q 57.14% $28,297 $21,244 $6,203 $150 $700 1997 3,970 17.486A 273 1.68% 3,491 58.37% 50 22.52% 156 47,27% wrR 12,977 57.07% 11,628 71,76% 1,075 17.97% 144 64.86% 130 39.39% WW 41639 20.40% 3,696 22,81% 871 14.68% 28 12.61% 44 13.330/o CSR ,x,151 5.06% 607 3.75% 544 9,1o% Q 0.000/0 Q 0.000/0 $22,737 $16,204 $5,981 $222 $330 5/8/9211.27 Pa `A K Ab~i3AY 11f!!1lYI M19YgPA M K 6i 4tYl70 k'6 , ; ,bSxiZp1 .1 i rl r IADwf 1W 1FAMOR Saw NA" F -97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN NN POSED VS PRIOR YEAR ar~otis~ PRIOR YEAR PROPOSED APPROVED DIVISION1 BUDGET BUDGET VAR"Wg YEAR DEPARTMENT (DECREOP 1992-93 APPROVED Electric Depwtmenl 6,258 4,864 (1.394) Water Department 8,980 4,297 (2,643) Wastewater Department 7,455 9,172 1,717 Cts1M►Nxtity Sw*m Department 2,625 918 (1,707) 1993-94 APPROVED Electric Department 7,888 11,394 3,506 Water Department 5,187 3,799 (1,388) Wastewater Department 4,639 4,824 185 Community Services Department 2,870 11103 (1,787) 1894-96 APPROVED Electric Department 14,397 16,483 2,086 Water Department 12,312 9,871 (2,441) Wastewater Department 2,813 2,260 (Sg3) CammunltyServices Department 5.690 4,669 (921) 1895-96 APPROVED Electric Department 13,841 12,590 (1,251) Water Department 9,868 11,174 1,318 Wastewater Department 3,800 2,3,92 {768) Communfty Services Department 716 2,201 1,486 1986-97 APPROVED Electric Department WA 31970 WA Water Department WA 12,977 WA Wastewatar Deparlment WA 4,639 WA Community Services Department WA 1,151 WA w A 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES SOARD) 15-Apr-92 (ALL YEARS) REQUESTING Pf?OVECT P T 0 rPT NllMBEf?Ifpfy HONA CURFIENT ,11D-!N x FUND REVENUE C57N8T1i OTHER TMAL PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1992-93 ELEOTP40 0"2"1 MIOC,~MOgQUIPMENTIFURNITUFIE $0 $201000 ELECTRIC 93•-0260-02 CIS $0 $0 $20,000 ELECTRIC 93--0250-0 PLANT R9COR('~ STUDY $0 $0 000,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $60,000 ELECTRIC 93-02611-01 POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS 000,000 $0 $0 $100,000 ELEMIC 93--0261•;0T OFFiCEIPACILITY EQUIPMENT, i•IXTURES AN $a $ 13,000 $0 $0 $60,000 ELECTRIC 93--0261-03 UNIT S FDF MOTOR REPLACEMENT $0 $0 ii6,000 $0 $0 $10!60 ELECTRIC 93-4261-4M FUEL GASPIPf:LINE $2.000.0w X6' $0 $0 $0 $16,000 ELECTRIC 93-0252-01 O!H EXTENSIONS & IMPROVEMENTS $0 $33100 $0 $0 $331 ELEOTRIO 93-026902 POWER FACTOR 1MPROV9MENTS $0 11 $25,000 $0 $0 $331,00° ELECTRIC 93•-0262-03 UG EXTENSIONSIIMPR~MENTS $0 $126,004 0 $0 S(,CTR10 95-0,262-04 TRANSFQ+RME1~8 EQUIPMENT; so $0 ,000 to $0 $126,000 ELECTRIC 93-0252-05 MOTOR PC701 REPLACEMENT 5?251,OOO' $0 $2za,4o51 ELEOTNIC 934242-* MISC 10" AMP EQUIPMENT $0 $0 10$60,000 $0 $sz,°$0 $111°,000 ELECTRIC 93-0262-07 RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS $10'°~ $0 $0 $100,000 EWTRIO 0$4252-09 00H TO UNDERGROUND CONVERSIONS $0 0 $,000 $0 $0 510,000 ELECTRIC 93-0262-00 MISC. OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFURNITURE $0 $6.~ $0 $0 $9$5,000 ELECTRIC 93-02U-10 CONTINGENCY ,000 $0 $0 56,000 ELECTRIC 93-0263-Ot METERS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT $0 ~RG'000 $0 $0 $198!000 SLECTAIC 1i 0263-A2 MOOILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 00 $0 698 $0 $0 $0 $98,000 ELECTRIC 93-0253-03 MISC TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT $0 8' 0 $00,000 ELECT" 9$~?2b;f-p4 LOAO MANAG1EMENT PROGRAM ;0 $23,000 $0 $0 $23,000 ELECTRIC 93-0264-01 MISC TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT $0 0 $95,000 $0 $0 $26,004 ELECT". 934ZS"2 UPGRADS SCAOA i $26,000 $o $0 $26,000 ELECTRIC 93-0266-01 HICKORY SUBSTATION ACB RETROFIT $198J)00 $o 0 00 X104,0 $0 $108000 ELECTRIC 93-4266.09 _ REPLACE 40 XV BREAKERS S $o $0 $108,000 ELECTRIC 93-0256-03 MISC TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT ~'w $x°°'00° p $0 $94,000 ELECTRIC 93-020mN MOBILE EQUI, REPLACEMENT 06619 $0 ,000 $o 630,000 ELECTRIC 93-0266-06 BATTERY REPLACE-LOCUST SUB $o $0 $1$ $0,,77000 $ $000 a0 $11,0$0 $18,0°0 So 510,000 i~ 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) 16-Apr-92 (ALL YEARS) REQUESTIAK,I PRWEO,r van. 1 BOND CURRENT AID-IN T ?rw DEPT Nl1MBER FIND 96VENUE C"TR onccH to ELECTRIC 0"257-01. MISG, OFFICE I QUIPMENTIFURNITURE $0 $4,000 ELECTRIC 93-0268-01 RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING $0 $0 74,6w 0 ELEOTHIC 85-4946-02 MEAT IT M AA7 FtlAL i $0 #$1!132,,000 000 $40,0 ~ 172,000 ELECTRIC 93-0268-03 STREET (,l(1HTS - SECURITY $0 $32,000 $"iQQO $0 $0 132,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1993-94 ELEOTRIC 9aTo2s041 MISC, pFFICE AUiPMEAIT/FURNITURE $0 2p,004 ; $0 ELECTRIC 94-0250-02 MOTOR POOL 10 18 00 $16,000 ELECT" 0"250F03 NEW SERVICE FACILITY x,6«1,0$0 $0 ' 10 $®,0$0 118,000 ,6«1,0$0 0 ; 13300 - $0 $0 ~M.00p ELECTRIC 94-0261-01 POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS $ ELECTRIC 94-0251-02 OFFICE/FACILITY EQUIPMENT, FIXTURES AN $$16,000 $0 $0 ELECTRIC 84-0261-03 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ,000 $0 $0 $16,000 SLECS'FUQ l14-01161-04 POWERPLAW101p~iCV~Mf:I~ITB so 114,000 $o s16,000 129,000 1;W1 $0 ELECTRIC M-0251-06 UNIT 6 GENERATOR RETAINING RINGS '1 0$0 00 so $130 $0 , 014PTFW 047W-01 lNH ~ W IMPF104MF~+IT4 E388,D00 ,0 so ~ $130 000 ELECTRIC 84-0262-02 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS $0 $30,000 $0 Mpmo "49-0 U/0 1604 MAC? JMWVEM4NT6 $0 i96A,h00 $30,000 ELECTRIC 81-0262-04 TRANSFORMERS AND EQUIPMENT so 3o", ! axomlo 9,11-144-0 MOSIW RQU $0 1263,000 10 10 1283,000 IPlr1 AEPLACSIII N C $0 sI8 ID" $0 1117,000 ELECTRIC 94-0262-08 MISC. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT $0 $130,000 ;0 ; $ 10'"o I EL 16 X0-07 MQwr `a4wo,.FAUMNTO $0 $10,0D0 $0 $0 ELECTRIC 94-0262-08 O/H TU uNDERGROUND CONVERSIONS 12,300,000 $346,000 $0 04,f alokoTNIQ, 04-M2-00 AlISO. OFP1CE MUIPMF~I'~IFORNI URS $0 $51Dgq $0 $0 $2,6a6,000 ELECTRIC 84-0252-10 CONTINGENCY $0 $480,000 $o $0 80,E ELEOTRIC 94-02) -11 COMMVNICA'I"$ EQUIPMENT 60 $231000 $0 $~3 $0 $$23,000 ELECTRIC 94-0263-01 METERS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT . 000 ELECTRIC 04 90"9 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $0 $i 13,000 $0 $0 1113,400 ELECTRIC 94-0263-03 REPLACE METER TESTBOARD $S' $0 $22,000 $27,000 ELECTRIC 84-OM-W TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 150,000 $o $o ~n $60,000 $24,000 W $0 i24,000 ..r 1093-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED ts-Apr-92 (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) (ALL YEARS) P ONJI &P" PAW60T ?"for BOND CURRENT AID-IN Nc!$IBEit FUND HE'VENUE CONSIR OTHER rom ELECTRIC 94-0263-06 LOAD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM t0 $30,000 s0 $0 $30,000 EL CrRIa 044254.01 TO AND EQUIPMENT $4 $251000 s0 $0 0W ELECTRIC 94-0264-02 UPGRADE BCADA COMM LINES TO FIBER $0 $3301000 $0 $0 $3301000 EMT W 0"N54-4$ #34PL.A00 VINTAGE RADIO RWEAPTEFIS $0 $181000 $0 $0 $10100 ELECTRIC,, i LA 94-0254-04 MOBILE DATA 8Y TEMS $0 $110,000 $0 $0 $110,000 IOW 4111$TAT" ACS RETROFIT S 3THIC ' H 9"2"l KING iD $182,000 W W 221R ELECTRIC 94-0265-02 REPLACE 69 KV BREAKERS $95,000 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 I"L! 0"Os-" MII3O, Togw ANP EQUIP, $0 $301ow 60 is it" ELECTRIC 94-0255-04 MOBILE EQUIP. REPLACE. #6605 $0 $20,000 s0 $0 $20,000 Euww w-02ul-05 pa'>wIgTRAWMMER¢(HICKORY 1) so $12.0m $0 $0 s1g,Aoo ELECTRIC 94-0265-09 LAND AQUISITION s0 $80,000 $0 $0 $60.000 CIHHIG w401-41 MM. OFM E IcOUIPMENTPFl1HNITUFiE $4 ,,000 to W $4,000 ELECTRIC 94-0258-01 RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING $0 $38,000 $40,000 s0 $781000 SLECT" "_04#702 STW-T pa"m r 4%MRIAL $0 , $$04,000 $0 $0 $104,000 ELECTRIC w-0268-03 STREET LIGHTS - SECURITY s0 s34,000 $0 $0 :34,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 19W,-96 St >4-po1 ~116C. QFME aaIUIPMNYfFtfF3NITUAE 4028o,W0 0 W $3a0,0o0 ELECTRIC Ki-0250-02 MOTOR POOL 0 $10,000 $0 $26,000 sag ow ' NEW RYI4P FACILITY $2,300,040 $0 $0 60 0+01vW100 ELECTRIC 954251-01 POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS $0 $361000 $0 s0 s36,000 ifS-0 1«02 OIIR:IC ASIII,.1'tY EQUIPMENT, FIXTURES AN $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $16,400 ELECTRIC 95-0261003 GAS TURBINE COMBINED CYCLE INSTALLAT $10,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1010001000 EI QTRIC 2¢9-01 WH I TEWION$ A IMPROVEMENT$ $0 $332,004 40 $0 On,= ELECTRIC 06-026242 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS $0 $'~l,000 $0 $0 $31,000 9"2I;2 " U1Q Ma a- 4SMS & IMPROVEMENTS $0 $1.04:,000 $0 ELECTRIC 95-0262-04 TRANSFORMERS B EQUIPMENT $0 S ELECTRIC %-0252-05 MOTOR POOL Ri PLACEMEN'C $0 $42,,000 s0 $000 $0 00 $278,000 ELECTRIC 95-0262-0 MISC. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT $0 $82,00 $124,040 $0 $135,000 $0 $ SO $135,000 -NF3fA +Atd:,a _p gt, ugl_tl3t •q PA i.A 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 15-Apr-92 LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) (ALL YEARS) REQUESTING PROVEOr PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN DEPT NUOSER O"MMM FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER TOTAL ELECTRIC 95-0252-07 OH TSB WO CONVERSIONS $0 $3601000 $0 $0 ;980,000 ELECTRIC 96-0262-08 MISC. OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFURNITURE $0 $16,000 $0 $0 $15,000 ELECTRIC 9"252-0 CON l"PlICY $0 $480,000 $0 $0 114$01000 ELECTRIC 95-0253-01 METERS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT $0 $144,000 $0 $0 $144,000 ELEOMO 95-0263-02 MOTOR POOL REPLACEMENT $0 46,000 $0 $26,000 $114,000 ELECTRIC 95-0253-03 MISC TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT $0 $21,900 $0 $0 $21,000 ELECTRIC 0542534A LOAD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM $0 $36,000 $0 $0 4,98,904) ELECTRIC 95-0254-01 MISC TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT $0 $30,000 $0 $0 030,000 ELECTRIC 954254-02 REPLACE VEHICLE 6420 $0 $2.000 RO $13,009 416fo0D ELECTRIC 96-0264-03 COMPUTER AIDED DISPATCH $11+11000 $34,000 $0 $0 $N.000 rEI SGTI~IC 96-02&"l iiETRQ BREAK-LOCUST/NORTHLAKES $266,000 ;d $0 i0 "46,0Q0 ELECTRIC 95-0255-02 SUBSTATION SCREENING (LOCUST) $53,000 $0 $0 $0 $53,000 EL.EOT'RIC 9542" BATTERY REPLACEMEN'TINORTHLAKES 410,090 W $0 $0 001000 ELECTRIC 954255-94 MISC TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT $0 $30,000 $0 $9 $30,000 ELECT" 0-02 Of DUPLEX AIRPORT SUBSTATION 480,000 $0 0 $0 ;80,000 ELECTRIC 96-0257-0t MISC. OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE $0 $4,000 $0 $0 $4,000 ELECTRIC "-025$-01 AgSI0ENT STREET LIGHTING $0 $30,000 $49,000 $0 470,000 ELECTRIC 96-0258-02 STREET LIGHTS - ARTERIAL $0 $147,000 $0 $0 $147,000 ,Ii ELECTRIC s D, -9 STREET LIGHTS T &I0¢ul~lt Y $0 moo $0 $4 $ -a ,W - 11 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1996-96 ELECTRIC 98-0260-01 MISC, OFFICE EQUIPIFURNITURE $0 $200 $0 $0 $20,000 ELECTRIQ 9A-0251-01 POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS $0 $36,00i, $0 W $38,000 ELECTRIC 96-0261-02 OFFICE/FACILITY EQUIPMENT, FIXTURES AN $0 $15,000 $0 $0 15,000 ELECTRIC 9"25t-03 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 110 $8,000 $0 $28,000 98,000 ELECTRIC 98-02'61G04 GAS TURBINE COMBINED CYCLE INSTALLAT 000 $0 $0 $0 810001000 ELECTRIC98-0232-01 04H EXTENSIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS ~ $0 $346,000 $0 $0 5346,000 ELECTRIC 96-0262-02 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS $0 $33,000 $0 $0 $33,000 ELECTRIC 98--0262-03 U/13 EXTENSIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS $0 $926,000 $0 W $928,000 1993-97 CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT PLAN LISTING OF PROJEC; TS (ALL. YEARS) REQUESTED {APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD} 15-Apr-82 IRE'QuFSr# l% fa --~-w - - m RdIECT T OED rVLIAl9l:f BOND ~11HlJ CtaligEN?" ,1JO-rN ----r•`• fir ELECTRIC IYUE' CONSTl7 UTHEp O~kCTRifi TRANSFORMERS AND EQUIPMENT ELECTRIC ' MOT" p w EiOPRACSMENT so s'89,000 ~2 08 MISC, TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT $0 WOOD $0 $0 $289,000 Oa"0 7 A44 $0 $164,000 ELECTRIC 98-0262-Qg T~T WAY~ENTS $o $140,000 $0 1YO, Oq ELOCTRIii O/H TO LUG COAIVERSfONS w sw,Q00 $0 $140,000 ELECTRIC MisC. 98- AI~pIC r p4►fP.{~tr t7 u I ITUE $a> $376,000 i 4,alw 0262-10 CONTINGENCY i0 $16,000 $0 ELECTRIC $0 $375,000 a-o -ot M " ELECTRIC Ma . w $480,000 $0 010ow " 98-0253-0?. MOBILE EQWPM~ REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT $0 $6 E~CT'RIC 00-025 0,$ MW TOOI.9 10 X155,000 $480,000 ELECTRIC NO EQUIPMENT $0 $6,000 $0 $0 . 0263-04 LOAD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM $0 s$ ,000 $13,000 $18.000 ELM 4 Mw.. 98- $0 $0 ELECTRIC 98--02W-~1 8C T000 ANO EQUIPMENT ro $10,000 $0 W)q , E ~ -02 AURCH OP TIME DOMAIN REFUMETER $0 t90,oo,0 $0 x,000 REPLACO y0' TAQE! $0 ELECTRIC 98-0264-04 FMOO REPEATERS $1600 $26,000 s0 ' $26,000 PURCHASE FfVE MOBILE DATA UNITE ' $0 $0 $0 TRIC ELECTRIC W-005$"' OUPLEXAI $12.,000 $8,000 $?$,aoo WOK SUBSTA7Ipy $0 88-0265-W REPAIR LOCUST ST SUB F.XT $0 $20,000 MISC TOOLS $0 , ELECTRIC AND EQUIP $10,000 $Q $0 $2 SLL~C. RIO 96-40255-N MOBILE EQUIPIREPLACE PYES02 $0 $90,000 $0 00 $10,000 A~921, -01 MISC, $0 $9,000 $0 00 $04000 ELECTRIC 98-0257 READ LE9TREET L1p iT HQNITUiiE $0 $4,~ $0 $8,000 $17,000 el- "-!a OA^~ "2 OT"M I~K~iH'r'~ - ARTERIAL $0 $33,000 10 $0 $1,ow ELECTRIC 98-0258..0;1 STREET LIGHTS - SECURITY $60000 $83,000 $0 12171000... $0 $0 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1996-97 $0 $37,000 $0 $217,000 ELECTRIC ELECTRIC 07-0950'"01 MIX OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE $0 $37,000 TR 97-0251-01 POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS "HMO+iq;; ELECTRIC 07-025142. OpF10EIpAQILl7y lkOUIpMENT, FIXTURES AN $15000 $0 97-0251-03 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMF.N'f so $1165 $,000 i0 $1.5,000 ELECTRIC ,000 $0 $ao,aw $0 yt1,000 $$00 $3,000 $18,000 $12,000 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 15-Apr-92 LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) (ALL YEARS) NC-W 417AfQ PROJECT Pf~Ctl C>" VOND CURRENT AID-IN UEpT NUMBSR 1G1~1 FUND REvkwus, coNs?F? OTHER to r4 ELECTRIC 97-026241 O!H X7 M51QM5 AND IMPROVEMENTS W $094,D00 $0 $0 ;Sg~,gpp ELECTRIC 97-0252-02 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS $0 $33,000 $0 $0 03,000 ELECTRIC 97-0252-0 UIQ WOV4 , , 014 W IMPROVEMENTS $0 $090,01K1 t4 $0 11WI P" ELECTRIC 97-0252-04 TRANSFORMERS AND EQUIPMENT $0 $304,000 $0 $0 $304,000 ELEOTRIC 117-924245 MOTOR PC►% AEP ,ACEMENr W WON $0 $127,000 Z14,QQ0 ELECTRIC 97-0252-06 MISC. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT $0 $145,000 SO 0 $145,000 ELECTRIC 17-02IW41 O/H TO UNDERGROUND CONVERSIONS $0 $380,000 $0 $0 W,00D ELECTRIC 97-0252-08 MISC. OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFURNITURE $0 $12,000 $0 $0 $12,000 ELECTRIC V7-0202-44 cONTING CY W $480,000 w $0 44",009 ELECTRIC 07-0263-01 METERS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT $106,000 $W.Do0 0 $0 $188,000 ELECTRIC 97-0253-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $0 $0 0 $14,000 $14,000 FI.ECTRIC 97-0263-03 MISC TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 0 $23,000 0 $0 $23,000 LLKOTRIC P7-090$44 LOAD MMIAOEMW PFIOGUM $0 $46,0130 W 0 41I{,QQO ELECTRIC 97-0254-01 MISC TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 0 $25,000 $0 $0 $25,000 FL140TNIC 01.00442 'AePLACS WHICLE 00404 $0 01000 $0 $12,00 414,000 ELECTRIC 97-0254-03 REPLACE VINTAGE RADIO REPEATERS $0 $16,000 $0 =0 =18,000 0140M. Old ENLA GE COMMUNICATIONS SHOP 0100,000 $!<0 $0 M ¢100033 ELECTRIC 97-0255-01 SUBSTATION SCREENING (NORTHLAKES) $67,000 0 $0 i0 $87,000 RLACT" E ECTR 01-025"2 IC 3 FIBER OPTICS (LOCUST TO H CKORY) $0 $75W1001) $0 lo 0 0 $$0 , 0 $iS`,ow ,000 01E0TRIO WI-OW-04 MISOVEII.S MO EWIPMENT $0 $30200 $0 $0 WOOD ELECTRIC 97-0267-01 MISC. OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 0 $4,000 $0 $0 $4,000 LLECTRI10 07-4258-01 RESIL OMAL MEET LIGHTING $0 $31,000 $50,000 W $87,000 ELECTRIC 97-0268-02 STREET LIGV ff, - ARTERIAL $0 $170,000 $0 $0 $170,000 ELECTRIC 97-090-09 STREET LIQHT4 - SECURITY 00 $301000 $0 $0 $39,000 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN USTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) 24-Apr-92 (ALL YEARS) ` Rl:QUE'Srwa ~J"iiWECT +4ROVECr .~....,._.,~....._......m.-.....,~,.......__.._._....._._..,......_........,_ - Lr' ~YNMdER nAN BONA CURHE 410-IN FUND i:wv s CQIm OrHER TOTAL PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1992-93 WATER 144 -01 MPCWA OOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFURN $0 $1,000 WATER 03-(460-02 OFFICE REMODELING $0 000 t $11 $0 $2,000 !r0 SO $2,000 WATER 1lr-W~O-d! #00IIA CllIIPM- .r $0 $19,000 $0 $31,000 #i4,00G WATER 95$-0480-02 OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT $0 $2,000 $0 so 2,000 WATER -04$g 4 BT#i f{ t3 CURRENT 0EECTQR $0 $12,000 so $0 121000 WATER N3-0460-04 COVERED CHLORINE STORAGE BUILDING $0 $20,000 $0 $0 20,000 WATER u-44" A01 RAY ROBERTS WTP AND RAW WATER FACIL $0 $040 $0 WATER 93-0480A03 BOOSTER STATION AND SYSTEM TIE-IN $0 $0 $0 0 WATER. 15-0141Qef02 FINISH WATER TRANSMISSION LINE $0 0 WATER 93-04,30D06 DISINFECTION SYSTEM MODIFICATION $400,000 $276,000 $0 $0 $0 40275 0,,000 WATER ~ Tp_$400,000 $a $u $o aooooo 1-01 OvIaASIM WATERLINE;; $100,01)(I 40 $0_ $0 $100,000 WATER 93-0481-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $0 $44,000 $0 $62,000 $96,000 WAY" '11F*0}4! •0!I WATt~R TAPS, 00P6 $0 $0 $5010001 WATER 934W6144 REPLACE FIRE HYDRANTS & VALVES $0 $0 $11i,ooo $0 $0 i16,000 WA's M401-0 REPLACE WAYORLINL STOW PROGRAM WATER 93-MI-06 (1993) REPLACE MISC. WATERLINES 127,000 $0 $0 $127,000 to i22,000 $0 io i22,000 WAM. 9-044144 PEVEL"IWT PLAN WATERLINES i0 $$130,000 $0 $0 $$60,000 WATER 93-0481-.6 (1993) DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE WT $3,000 $0 $0 $0 WAT T W1-~T4SiM1(~ . frl p r~MOS REPL„ WATERUNSS $3,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,00 WATER 93-0481-11 ESTASUSHMENT OF EAST LOWER PRESSU $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $30,000 WATT 9i-0481«12 TEASLEY LANE MEPI.ACII MENT (SI?NPT) $942,000 WATER 93-0481 D06 (1992) REPL. MISCELLANEOUS WATERLINES $0 $0 $0 $842'000 WATER $3'°0441)08 (1062) PISTRIEUT ON SYSTEM UMAAD> WA $o $2tso,0a0 $0 i0 $280,000 $483,000 $0 $0 $0 $48$,000 WATER 93-0161COS (1991) DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE WA $1,006,000 $0 $0 WATER 0.0482-01 WATER METERS $0 $1,008,000 WATER 93-0483-01 FIELD EQUIPMENT $0 $1,1000 ~w► $0 $00$0 $0 ;$1911,000 WATER 93-.04t19T02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE $0 $0 11,000 WATER 93-0~183-03 GIs WORKSTATION $0 $1,~ $0 $0 $1,000 $o $20,000 $o $o s20,000 v ,.p+.+n~ w,aara , 3h'?-ra7.!:! I s,'{fo 4 u?. ,4 A4';1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 24-Apr-92 LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) (ALL YEARS) REQUESTING PROJECT PRCUECT VOND CURRENT A10-IN DEPT NUMBER Q TION FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTWE'R TOTAL WATER 9$-0480-01 LABORATORY UPGRADE $0 $3,000 t0 t0 $3,000 WATER 93-048U42 LABORATORY EQUIPMENT $11,000 $0 i0 $0 $11,000 WATER U-0400-0 t?IY IN,~NAi<It3N MQMT SYSTEM i0 11,000 $0 $0 i11000 WATER 93-0480-04 WATERSHED MONITORING STATION $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $2,000 WATER 0-04" HYAC RENOVATION $2,000' $0 $0 t4 $?Pw PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1993-94 WATER 840450-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/TURN $0 $1,000 $0 $0 ;1,000 WATER 94-0460E02 OFFICE REMODELING $0 $6,000 $0 $0 $6,000 WATER 9440480-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $0 $6,000 $0 $20,000 $26,000 WATER 94-0480-02 OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT $0 $2,000 $0 $0 2,000 WATER 44'-0490-09 NEW HOOSTSA PUMP FOR THE UPPER PRE $65,000 $0 $0 $0 65,000 WATER 94-0460-04 REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING CHEMICAL ST $0 $20,000 $0 $0 20,000 WATER W-04WA01 RAY ROBERTS WTI AND RAW WATER FACIL ;R ;0 $0 $0 0 WATER 84-046OA03 BOOSTER STATION AND SYSTEM TIE-IN $41,000 $0 $0 $0 41,000 WATER W-0480002 FINISH WATER TRANSMISSION LINE $0 $0 $0 $0 0 WATER 94-0480F03 OZONATION DISINFECTION SYSTEM (SPEN $166,000 $0 $0 $0 166,000 WATER 04'-048pF04 2 MG ELEVATIRD STORAGE TANK $1,301.0w $0 so $0 113011000 WATER 94-0461-01 OVERSIZE WATERLINES $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 WATER W-0451-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $0 $16,000 $0 $15,000 $91,000 WATER 94-(481-03 WATER TAPS, LOOPS $0 $0 $60,000 $0 $60,000 WATER 94.1)"1-04 REPLACE FIRE HYDRANTS & VALVES $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $16,000 WATER 94-0461-06 REPLACE WATERLINE STREET PROGRAM $0 $360,000 $0 $0 $360,000 WATER %-0461-08 REPL. MISC. WATERLINES (1994) W $28,000 $0 $0 $26,000 WATER 94-0461-08 DEVELOPMENT MAN WATERLINES $0 $260,000 $0 $0 $260,000 WATER M-04#11-49 (1684) DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE WA ~~OCO $0 $0 $0 $46,000 WATER 94-0461-10 FIELD SERVICES REPL. WATERLINES $0 $101,000 $0 $0 $101,000 WA`rER 94-'046106 (1993) REPL. MISO, WATERLINES $0 $289,000 $0 $0 $289,000 WATER 94-0461E09 (1993) DISTRIBUTfON SYSTEM UPGRADE WT $36,000 $0 $0 $0 $36,000 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED 24-Apr-9 (ALL YEARS) (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) 1~1;GK1A6T)WGI PROUECr pp(, icr 9OND OORRENr AID-IN lY(IAIBJ"!i ON FUND REVENUE CONSrA Men TO AL WATER 94-0461D09 (1962) 0.14TRIIMON SYSTEM UPGRADE WA $486,000 y WATER 94-0482-01 WATER METERS $Q $0 $0 000 i 1133,000 $0 $0 :193,000 WATER 94--0 M + WNA$ EQUIPMENT $0 $5,000 $0 00 $510QQ WATER 6140483-01 FIELD EQUIPMENT $0 $1,000 $0 $0 WATEf(, 04-~ 40-62 OF`FICO Wp► l1'ANDFURNITU8 $0 $1,000 $p $1000 WATER 64-NW41 DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM $0 $0 $1 t :"TSR 94.048042 ,ABORATORYOQU1PME{T ,000 $0 $0 $1,000 00 WATER 84-0480-03 WATERSHED MONITORING PROGRAM $$2,000 $0 $0 $3' "-0410.44 !.lQUICr 0H,R411f1'II? CiARED SPEC $0 133,000 10 $0 13,000 114,000 ~ 00 ;0 $14,= PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1994-95 WATER 964450-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFURN $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $11000 WATER 95-4440T01 MO6iLf;Egt!!P~(ENf $0 s921000 $0 110,000 $+l,aoa WATER 95-0480-02 OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT $0 $2,000 $0 $0 2,000 WATER i$-04040$ I„11OM' Y pApMLE COU" (F~3 $0 X9,00(1 1z0 $0 2411000 WATER 95-0480-04 REPLACE SCADA SYSTEM $125,000 SO $0 s0 126,000 WATER 96-0480-05 SITE ACQUISITION FOR ELEVATED STORAG $0 $65,000 $0 $0 65,000 WATER 96-0480A01 RAY ROBERTS WTP AND RAW WATER FACIL $72,000 s0 $0 $0 72,000 WAT-" i!lr•0440A03 DOOSTER 8TATION AND SYSTEM TIE-IN $4,00000 $0 $0 $0 4,000,000 WATER 96-NOOC02 FINISH WATER TRANSMISSION LINE (1990) $0 $0 $0 $0 0 WATER ".44" OXQNAN-m- 6ISINFECTIQN SYSTEM (SPEN $10846,000 $0 $0 W 1,448,000 WATER. WATER 95-046OF04 2 MG ELEVATED STORAGE TANK $1,099,000 $0 $0 10 1,099,001) S-WeOGar O GNA" gI"FgaTi Nd SYSTEM (RAY H $81 Iwo $o is $o 91,000 WATER 95--0481-01 OVERSIZE WATERLINES $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 WATER 9""j-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $0 $64,000 $0 $10,000 $64,000 WATER 96-0461-03 WATER TAPS, LOOPS $0 $50,000 WATER 115-0461-04 REPLACE FIRE HYDRANTS d VALVES $0 $40,000 $50, $0 WATER 96-0461-05 REPLACE WATERLINE STREET PROGRAM $0 WO'~ 10 $150,000 $0 $0 $160,000 WATER 96-0461-08 (1990) REFL. MISC. WATERLINES $0 $20,000 $0 $0 i20,000 :5:n.4. ,.;cv+. ,.1 . 1P a%y4t•, ...3uG=J Iya.a:.: M•d ln:.., 1993-97 CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT PLAN 24-Apr-92 LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) (ALL YEARS) REQU01'N? PROJECT PRGUEQT BOND CURRENT .MD-W DEPT NUMBER ~l I! ON FUND REVENUE CONSTR OrNEN TOTAL WATER 95-0461-08 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATERLINES $0 $260,000 $0 $0 $250,000 WATER 05 4)481-RR (j$0 014TRIEUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE WA $24,000 60 $0 i24,ARR WATER 95-0461-10 FIELD SERVICES REPLACE WATERLINES $0 $100,000 $0 $0 6106,060 WATER 81-0l11 F98 (11W ) RfOl, MW; WATERLINES $0 $368,000 $0 $9 ""low WATER 95-0461F09 (1994) DIST, SYS. UPGRADE WATERLINES $796,000 $0 $0 $0 $796,000 WATER 96-0"1900 (1993) DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE WA $510,000 $0 $0 $0 ;5100 WATER 95-046241 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $0 621,000 $0 $1 i,D00 138,000 WATER 96-0462:-02 WATER METERS $0 $140,000 60 $0 040,000 WATER 95-0462-03 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT $0 $6,000 $0 $0 $6,000 WATER 9b-0483-01 MELD EQUIPMENT $0 $1,000 W $0 $1,000 WATER 95-0463-02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $14000 WAFER 95-OW-0 '"NMANCE SYS'T'EM . $0 $30,950 $0, 30 Mow WATER 96-0480-01 DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM $0 $1,000 $0 $0 61,000 WATER 9"40"2 GAS CHROMATOG)RAP14 (GC) 48,000 III $0 $0 Wacw WATER 95-W60-03 LAB EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $2,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1995-96 WAS' 4 015-0414Q~0I MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FURN $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $1,000 WATER 96-0450-02 SERVICE CFNTER OFFICE DEVELOPMENT $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $10,000 WATER 00.044"ll MO61L9 Pr, APMENT $0 $1,000 $0 $13,000 $1 ,000 WATER WW60-02 OFFICE' oRNITURE AND MACHINES 60 $2,000 $0 $0 2,000 WATER f-4400-09 TOOL$~41OUIPMENT $0 $2,000 $0 ;Q 3,000 WATER 98-046" MAINT- WANCE EQUIPMENT SHED $0 $10,000 $0 60 10,000 WATER 06-046CA01 RAY ROBERTS WTP AND RAW WATER FACIL $2050,000 $0 $0 $0 2,68N,000 WATER W046OA03 BOOSTER STATION AND SYSTEM TIE-IN $2,540,000 $0 $0 $0 2 648 000 WATER 98-0460A02 FINISH WATER TRANSMISSION LINE (1990) ~1,68~fQ00 $0 $0 $0 116621000 WATER 96-046OF03 OZONATION DISINFECTION SYSTEM (SPEN $1, 8 ,000 $0 $0 60 1,980,000 WATER 98-04K*01 OZONATION DISINFECTION SYSTEM (RAY R 6619,000 $0 $0 $0 519,000 WATER 96-0461-01 OVERSIZE WATERLINES $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 k `J 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) 24-Apr-92 (ALL YEARS) REQWOPW PROWECT PRGOl,ECT aEP1 NUME R 19ONQ CURRENT AID-IN S. FUND RE[ViEAIUE CONSTR OTHER TOTS. WATER WI-0401-09 ;M W EQUIPMENT WATER 98-0481-09 WATER TAPS, LOOPS $0 $2'000 $0 $13,000 $16,0p0 WATER < WI-0481-04 REPWO I RE WMAMTS 8 VALVES i70,000 $0 574,000 WATER 96-0461-06 REPLACE WATERLINE STREET PROGRAM $0 140,000 $0 $0 WATER, . $O 1150,000 $4 $0 1160womo ,000 WATER 91}-4481-08 (1996) REPL„ AIIS(St. UANI OUS WATERLINES $0 $90,ow $0 $0 x¢11400 86-0481-W DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATERLINES $0 $260,000 WATER; -W41T09 (1998)131$T. BYB, UPpRA E WATT RLiNEB $o $zso;ooo WATER 96-0481-10 FIELD SERVICES REPLACE WATERLINES 00 $0 $0 ~r WATER 98-04415 08 1986) "PL, MIELLINEOUS WATERLINES 10 $100,000 $0 $0 1106,000 $0 $910,000 $0 so $Si6" WATER 96-0461009 (1995) DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE WA $382,000 $0 $0 WATER, 96-0481F9q (1094) 01-OT, BYB, LJP+af"g WATFAUNES $26b1000 $0 1382,000 WATER 98-0482-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $0 $i960 0 $0 4m 00 ,000 WATERW-0413-4; WATERMETER$ $0 4140,000 ,ODQ $0 $0 000 $0 121,0$0 140,000 r WATER 98-0462-03 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT $0 $5 .000 1$6,400 WATER 044 1 FIELD EC~NPMENT ,0o0 $o t0 a 000 WATER 98-0483-02 MISCELkANEOUSOFFICE EQUIFMENTIFURN $0 ;1,000 r<0 $0 41!000 WATER 911-Wp"l L,AI#000Y 00 $1,D$0 $0 $100 $0,06$1,o00 ATION .$8,000. 4 WATER 96-0480-02 DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM $0 $1,000 $0 WATER MWAIZ-0$ LASORUTQRYEQUIPMENT $0 $1,000 WATER 98-0480-04 WATERSHED MONITORING $0 $0 18$2,000 $0$0 O $0 $00 $2,000 WAy R ,000 S $8,000 A . " ,H,. NEF1: S Man.INFRAREDSP90 $121000 $0 $0 00 ;12,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1998-97 WATER 97-0460-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFURN $0 $1,000 $0 WATER 97-0466-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $0 $1,000 WATER 97-0480-02 OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT i0 0 $ $2122,,00000 0 $0 $0 :22,000 s° So $2,000 WATER 87-046OA01 RAY R0%RTS WTP AND RAW WATER FAC "4$#t'0id,000 $0 $0 WATER 97-04NO02 FINISH WATER TRANSMISSION LINE (1990) $3,766,000 $0 $A 0 $0 3$8'76 8,0,090 WATER 97•-0"01 Q70NATION DISINFECTION SYSTEM (RAY R $1,048,000 $4 ;0 $ 10 11 $1 04000 ,0<8,40p AM8>lY I..il1Y1A y4)tly ,yIABDII :IM1ILLMI :'tl`41'....I 1 }.OltIe1RY.i , •YUA4:1 k(g,/'A1 p.Hjl(}(j t.~:N' .✓OI~~~: .l^✓.~[.. INb~ia. ~t.2#`\f(lf~fx,(:S Ili9 t6iQ1aC,; 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) 24-Apr-92 (ALL YEARS) REQ1/,E$r1A+G PRCtIECT PRCIlECT QEPT ~ NUMBER FOND CURRENT A!0-iN PROW ON FUND REVENUE' CONSTR OTHER rorA4 WATER 97-0461-01 OVERSIZE WATERLINES $100,000 WATER 97-044142 MOMLE PQUIPM04 ' $0 00 i0 i0 $100,000 WATER 97-0481-03 WATER TAPS, LOOPS $0 $ $0 619,00 00 ;130,0$0 $144,000 WATER 97-0"I-N AEPI. PRE HYDR rS 6 VALVE'S $144,000 i0 5144,000 WATER 97-0481-06 REPLACE WATERLINE STREET PROGRAM 660 X40)000 $0 40 `",000 WATER 97-04Af~0~I AEPL. MI1~..WATERI~N90(im) $0 i160,o00 $0 00 $160,000 WATER 97-0461-08 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATERLINES $0 250,000 , WATER 97-0441-09 1997 DISTRIPUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE WAT X1so $260,000 $0 $0 $260,000 4100 WATER 97-0461-10 FIELD SERVICES REPLACE WATERLINES )0$ $100,000 0 $0 0 00 $0 $0 10 , WATER 07-048fH09 (1998) MISCELLANEOUS WATERLINES $0 $$10 $ $100,000 WATER 97-0481H09 (1998) DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE WA $527,000 ,Q$0 so $0 59170 WATER 97-~p"wop (1995) DISTAIt GN EYOTEM UPGRADE 11 fa,r w $0 $0 $0 $627,000 WATER 97-0482-Of $0 i140,000 WAS 97 2 WATER METERS 00 $0 $0 0110, MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT $o $140)000 WATER 97-0483-01 FIELD EQUIPMENT $0 $0,000 S6,Jp0 $0 $11000 $0 $0 WATER Yy.-04 "2 OFFICE EQLIIPMW 8 FURNITURE $0 $111000 $0 ;0 $1,000 WATER 97-0480-01 LABORATORY EQUIPMENT $0 $4000 $40000 WATER 97~-0480-02 MOWLE' EQUIPMENT (REPLACEMENT) $0 $0 0 54,004 WATER 97-0480-03 WATERSHED MONITORING ,000 $0 i0 16,000 $0 $6,000 $0 $0 18,000 v 29-Apr-92 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) (ALI. YEARS) PROUECT PRWEC7' OONA CURRENT AID-IN DE'EPTQUES7ING FUND REVENUE CONS7'R OMER T07AL D NUMBEROf$ I0N PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1992-93 93»U4°;1-01 MlW6.1.~4~/+ E000 OFFICE I QUIPMENTIFURN 1 $2,~ $0 $2,000 WASTTE $1' ATEH WASTEWATER 93-84131-02 OFFICE REMODELING $0 $19 0 s0 122,0$0. $41,040 WA> ATEIi 98-D T9^~1 MOBILE SWIPM $O $22 800 $O #0 $22,000 W118TEWATfIi 934970-02 LIFE STATION RENOVATION EWATER $p $10.000 93~-WZ4~ LIFT STATION 60,,WA 11 EA) $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $95,000 WAS i ~ ; WASTTEWATER 93-U470 -04 BENEFICIAL SLUDGE REUSE PROGRAM $0 ~ ~~~p p p $ SO $$0 $30 i$W,00$W,000 WASTEWATER LIFT STATION SCAD4 COMPUTER ,o$0 $o WASTEWATER 93-0470-05 SLUDGE FIELD IMPROV£MENrs $3o00 526,9$0 i0 $0 $2¢,000 WASTEWATER f1g.p17'0»07 SPARE PUMP 440 LO, $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $,000 V00,p00 WASTEWATER 93-0478-08 ,PECAN. CREEK SAMPLING ACCESS $7'~,~ $0 W $0 WWTP AN UlGAADE -13 MACS W/481'ErNATEH 93-04?!~~ SO $o $100,000 WASTEWATER 93-0471-01 OVERSIZE SEWERLINES $100,008 00 $0 $0 $7,p$0 $0,000 m, A 95. 11»n WoLo goulpmo," $0 00 $29,0$ 0 00 525000 ,WAV WWAS'TL WATER 98-0471-03 SEWER TAPS ~16Q,0$0 $6 00 $0 s WA$Tl I .000 ATER 91{-0471.04 AEP1 QE,$ !lt~AUNS STREET PROGRAM $405,000 W~~yyA-~R g3-0074-05 HICKORY CRK, INTERCEPTOR CREEK CfiO ~~p ~ ~ $0 $0 i0 So $106,wo WASTMATER 97l~971~ 01I A9PL. MISQ, S RLMIES (1993) $o so $250,000 WASTEWATER 93-0471-07 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWERLINES $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 WA5 AT4~1 x»0474.-" COLLOOTION SYMM UPGRADE-STUART #192 0 60 $0 $a 100,000 WASTEWATER 93-0471-10 UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR (1993) $0 $0 1 42,000 $ WA#'TEWA't'EA ~-Q4yt»41 ~IPILT~iATION WFLOW CORRECTidN„ 5400,000 $0 $266,000 WASTEWATER 93-0471D05 R£PL, SEWERLINE COOPER CREEK $1 a,0 $0 0 $0 0 $158,000 WASTEWAT ER "71010 UPGHAGE I RCEPTOR (1992) ,000 $O i0 $5,800 WASTEWATER 934472-01 FIELD EQUIPMENT $0 $5 $0 $0 $1,000 WASTEWATER 93~-Q479-02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT A FURNITURE $0 $1.000 $0 $0 1$1,000 WASTEWATER 93-0472-03 GIS WORKSTATION $0 58,000 $0 $0 $8,000 WASTEWATER 934951-01 LABORATORY UPGRADE $35,0$0 $0 $0 $0 $$8,000 l WASTEWATER 93-048142 LABORATORY EQUIPMENT 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 29-Apr-92 LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) (ALL YEARS) REOU STING PROJECT PROJECT BAND CURRENT AID-W DEPT NUMBER p#KW77ON FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER TOTAL WASTEWATER 93-0481.03 DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $1,000 WASTEWATER 93-0481-04 WATERSHED MONITORING STATION $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $3,000 WASTEWATIER 93-048145 BOOINQUOATOR$0 $4,000 `0 $0 $4,000 WASTEWATER 93-0481-06 HVAC RENOVATION $8,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,000 WASTEWATER 81401-07 MUFFLE FURNACE $0 $4,000 $0 $0 $4,000 WASTEWATER 83-0483-01 PRETREATMENT EQUIPMENT $0 $9,000 $0 $0 $9,000 WA$TW#ATSR 93-0483=02 DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM $0 $1,000 i0 $0 411I WASTEWATER 93-0483-03 VEHICLE (REPLACEMENT) $0 $16,000 $0 $0 $16,000 WA T"AT6A "-048.4-04 SW INCUBATOR $0 $1,000 $0 $0 ;i,4pla PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1993-94 WASTEWATER 94-0461-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFURN $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $1,000 Wl14TEWATE i 1~4-MIE'02 OFFICE REMODELING $0 $8,000 $0 $0 $8,000 WASTEWATER 94-M70-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $0 $16,000 $0 $36,000 $62,000 WA$TF.WAT9_A 94-0470-u LIFT 5Y1AVON RENOVATION $0 $20,000 $0 $0 320,000 WASTEWATER 94-0470-03 LIFT STATION SCADA $0 $11,000 $0 $0 $11,000 WASTEWATER 94447049 LAND PURCHASE $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 WASTEWATER 94-0470-06 IRRIGATION UTILIZATION $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $26,000 WASTEWATER 24-tH7U-0$ SLUDGE FIELD IMPROVEMENTS 113 $20,000 $0 $0 $24,000 WASTEWATER 94-0470 09 BENEFICIAL SLUDGE REUSE $85,000 $0 $0 $0 $136,000 WhSTE;VA,';EA 944m7wo3 WWTP UmRADI - i3 MCjp $1,460,000 $0 $0 60 $1,480,000 WASTEWAT04 9441471 01 OVERSIZE SFWERLINES $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 WR.,4TaVATEn 84-0471.07,, MOVILEEQJJIPMENT $0 $131,000 $0 $32,000 $1831000 WAS-rm;ATf n 00,.04714:3 SEWER TAPS $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $30,000 WH^,TEWA"Ek 94-0471-0A R;~pLACE3EWERLINESTRECTeROGRAM $0 5160,000 $0 $0 $160,000 WASTEWATER 94-,0477-0v HICKORY CRK. INTERCEPTOR CREEK CRO $0 $110,000 $0 $0 $110,000 WAS"(W&.ktA 94-0)7!. L'$ R'47P1., MISS, SEWERUNES (1994) $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $180,000 ` WASTEWATER 94-0471••07 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWERLINES $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $260,000 WASTEWATER 94-0471-09 UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR (1994) $44,000 $0 $0 $0 $44,400 v'\ IM-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 29-Apr-92 LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) (ALL YEARS) \ REQUE,Srm f'RAIucr PRwgoT SONA CURRENT AID-IN I lJUM6E(i ~I(k7lOAl FUND PEVE'NUE CONSTR OTHER TOM WASTEEWATER 94-0471-10 INFILTRATION INFLOW CORRECTION $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 WAS'"A'CF.A "7108 REP4» 1141$C, SEWFAUNE$ (1093) $0 $321,000 $0 $0 $921,034 WASTEWATER 94-M71 E09 COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE-STUART $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 WASTRWATP "71510 UI OWO {NTSRCEPTUR (1$93) $710,00r. $0 $0 W 5718,000 WASTEWATER 94-0471 D08 REPLACE SEWER LINE COOPER CREEK $0 $90,000 $0 $0 $90,000 WASTSyiIATE~t 114-0 71010 UPOPA09 INTSRCEP~TOR (1992) $324,000 $0 $0 $0 $424,000 WASTEWATER 94-047201 FIELD EQUIPMENT $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $3,000 WA WATPI %-0479-R OFFICE EQUIPMENT A FURNITURE 50 $1,00 40 $0 $1,000 WASTEWATER 94-0472-03 MAINTENANCE SYSTEM $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $30,000 WA$tIV04TOR 94-04$1-01` DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM 00 $2,000 $0 $9 $2;000 WASTEWATER 94-0481-02 LABORATORY EQUIPMENT $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $3,000 WAMWATR 9~1-W81^D8 WAT9FWfRD MONITORINQ $0 01000 $0 $0 58,m WASTEWATER 94-M81-04 MAINTENANCE BUILDING RENOVATIONS $0 $10,000 i0 $0 $10,000 WAST"AT$R 94-04111-44 LWUIO CNRO ► "RED SPED ;55,000 b w $0 sb,aa4 WASTEWATER 944483-01 PRETREATMENT EQUIPMENT $0 i1i,000 $0 $0 $!8,000 K►rl,4TOWATM, %4"34,2 MMOT9 MONITOPANO EQUIPMPIT $0 $8,004 60 P 49,000 WASTEWATER 94-0483-03 MAINTENANCE BUILDING RENOVATIONS $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $3,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1994-95 WA "Al" tai-0461-01 MISC LLIIN"$OFFICEEQUIPMENTIFURN $0 $1,000 W W 81,000 WASTEWATER 95-0470-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $0 $28,000 $0 $18,000 $46,000 WASiw FAT i 9b-0170-42 "LIi T OVATION REI OVATION 40 $33,000 $0 $0 MD00 WASTEWATER 95-0470-03 LIFT STATION SCADA $0 $9,000 $0 $0 $9,000 WA WATER 95-0470-0 BENEFICIAL SLUDGE REUSE PRO(iRAM $20+11000 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 WASTEWATER 95-0471-01 OVERSIZE SEWERLINES $100,000 $0 $0 SO $100,000 WA"MATER "71-O7 MwLg EQUIpAlEN1 $0 $121,000 $0 $0 1121,000 WASTEWATER 954471-03 SEWER TAPS $0 $0 $12,000 $0 $12,000 WASTEWATER 95-0471-04 REPLACE, SEWCRLINE STREET PROGRAM $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $180,000 WASTEWATER 95-0471-05 HICKORY CRK. INTERCEPTOR CREEK CRO $0 $165,000 *0 $0 $1651000 l f IMMY9 gFN1be' M'XNk?7 RY.W~kI 1H,.'Mt~ r.yy 1 'i=tMq' Ill y ;•}I}'y" •.a1,~. lig t7 ;,VHI~u~ AAA 1999-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) (ALL YEARS) 29-Apr-92 WOES ln7M. Pf CT 17F►7 NWQI"R 90N11 CURRENT AID-IN J:F; < - FUND REVENUZ CONNSrR ATHE'q TQrA4 WOTEWA19R s45-0471-0G REPL. MISC. SEWERLINES (1999) - 8 WASTEWATER 95-0471-07 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWER LINES 0 $ 50,000 WASTEWATER 1)5.0471^09 UPGRADE INMCEPTOR (1985) 00 i20,00o $0 60 $180,000 WASTEWATER 95-0471-10 INFILTRATION INFLOW CORRECTION 100+00 1A $0 $O 1250,000 ,000 WASTEWATER 95-0471F09 UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR (18114) $101,000 $0 $o so $0 17s7rl11, WASTEWATER 95-0472-01 FIELD EQUIPMENT iTJ1,0$0 $0 i0 1100,000 1o ooa WASTEWATER 95-0472-02 OFFICE' EQUIPMENT 6 FURNITURE $0 $1,000 40 WASTEWATER 95-0472-03 M0131LE EQUIPMENT $0 $1,000 $0 $a 111000 WO"ATER 05'-04$1.-01 DIV INFOHAUTIdNMgMT8Y3Tr;M $0 t19,ooo i1 ~ X1,400 WASTEWATER 85-0481-02 GAS CHROMATOGRAPH MGM 10 14,0^0 so 10 119,000 WASTEWATER 9&-D IN WATERSHED MONITORING 122,000 $p io 0 0,000 WASTEWATER 954M81-4M LAB EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT so 56,000 $0 $0 1 0.000 WASTEWATER W-043,41 PRETREATMENT EQUIPMENT SO $8,000 t0 0 18000 WASTEWATER 95-0483-02 DIV INFORMATION MQMT SYSTEM $2D 0 X1000 i0 $ 12,00DO0 $o U 60 ~ >1~~OQ0 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1895-99 12,000 WABdEWA7l q -0461-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE E'QUIPMENT/FURN WASTEWATER 95-0470-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 11,000 1p WASTEWATER 05-0470-03 LIFTSTATION RENOVATION $0 $28,000 10 $18,060 -8,000 ' WASTEWATER 95-0470-03 LIFT STATION SCADA $0 133,000 10 000 WASTEWATER 96.04!0..;35 I8"15FICIAL SLUDGE REUSE PROGRAM 00 $9 0$0 $0 $0 ~ 1 1933,000 0 $0 ,000 WASTEWATER 85-0471•-01 OVERSIZE SEWERLINES $200,000 $0 0 WASTEWATER "71-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 1001,001 00 ~ 1200,Ww WASTEWATER 95-0471-03 SEWER TAPS ~ 1121,000 is $0 1100,000 WASTEWATER 0-0471.04 REPLACE SEWERLINE STREET PROGRAM 10 2121,000 WASTEWATER 95-0471-05 HICKORY CRK, INTERCEPTOR CREEK CRO $o $0 $189,000 $U $12,r)00 $a io $ 60 00 WASTEWATER 95-D4714)0 REFL. MISC. SEWERl1NE3 (1995) 10 11611000 $0 $0 S19n,009 WASTEWATER 95-0471-07 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWER LINES $1 $0 $113 $2sa0,,ooa 000 $o $o $0 $196,U00 WASTEWATER 95-04FI-09 UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR (1995) 50 10 $180,000 148,110 $o $o $2so,alo $0 $48,000 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 29-Apr-02 LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOAHD) (ALL YEARS) REQUE9T1N0 ARwECT PRoIECT BOND CURRENT Alp-IN pin NUMBER ,PTION FUND REVENUE COWNSTR OTHER TOTAL WASTEWATER 95-0471-10 INFILTRATION INFLOW CORRECTION $100,000 $0 SO $0 $100,000 WAMT *TOR "71F W UPW W'1'ERC6I"TOR (1984) $771,000 $0 $0 $0 $771,000 WASTEWATER 85-W72-Of FIELD EQUIPMENT $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $1,000 WA8TEWIAT'ER 06-0472-02 t FMO ftgNT 6 FURNITURE $0 $1,000 $0 ill 61,000 WASTEWATER 95-0472-03 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $0 $19,000 $0 $0 $18,000 W44MAnK W044-01 DIV IN MATION MGMT SYSTEM i0 $4,01' $0 W t4~p" WASTEWATER 85-0481-02 GAS CHROMATOGRAPFI $22,000 $0 $0 $0 $22,000 WAV"A''m wi-0 l -w . WATEFISH D MONITORING $0 $6,000, $0 $R $4,00 WASTEWATER 96-0461-04 LAB EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT t0 $6,000 $0 $0 $8,000 +NWk*AT" W440" I PR TiI114T 4EN"I'EQUIPMENT $0 $1910m $0 $0 $191"" WASTEWATER 9t;-0483-02 DIV INFORMATION MQMT SYSTEM $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $2,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1995-96 w4mMA't4 ; WI-MI-01 MISCELLANE0USOFFICE EQUIPMENTIFURN $0' $1,000 $0 $0 $1,000 WASTEWATER W-0451-02 SERVICE CENTER OFFICE DEVELOPMENT $0 $10,000 t0 $0 $10,000 W ~#1SWA? R ti"?"I Wait* ONIPMENT $0 416,Og0 $0 $28,000 >N1, WASTEWATER 96-0470-02 LIFT STATION RENOVATION $0 $131000 SO $0 $1111000 WA IA 7A 0 UFT STATION 0044 $0 $1 t,G04 W $D 411,000 WASTEWATER 96-4470-06 BENEFICIAL SLUDGE REFUSE PROGRAM $0 $80,000 $0 $0 $60,000 WASTI,WAT p 170Foe F.A4~VATI fT, WORTH DRIVE L. x124,000 W $4 $a $1 O,o40 WASTEWATER 96-0,17OF07 REACTIVATE HWY 360 L. S. $90,000 $0 $0 $0 $90,000 WOTOW1AT" "0141GVENwSg1M MNES $1001000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 WASTEWATER W0471-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $0 $24,000 $0 $221000 $46,000 WASM VAM W-0471-03 SEWER TAPE $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $30,000 WASTEWATER 96-0471-04 REPLACE SEWERLINE STREET PROGRAM $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000 WAS1'E1MAM 96-04711-44 IIEPL. MISC. %VgRUNES (1996) 'vM06 44, 0 $160,000 $0 $0 3180,000 WASTEWATER 98-0471-W DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWER LINES $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $260,000 WASTSWATER 98-0471-" UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR (19%) $491000 $0 $0 W $48,000 WASTEWATER 98-0471-09 INFILTRATION INFLOW CORRECTION $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 I ✓1;:'I :l ,`,M1S>l'=d $L?r2:^ fGiAf.U, rtNiiM 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) 29-Apr-92 (ALL YEARS) REQUESTING PROJECT PRcvECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN DEPT NU448ER MORI,PnON FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER TOTAL WASTEWATER 9fi-047106 REPL. MISC, SEWERUNES (1995) to $150,000 $0 WASTEWATER 96-0474G09 UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR (1995) $821,000 $100,000 WASTEWATER 96-0472-01 FIELD EQUIPMENT 0 $O $821,000 WASTEWATER 96-0472-02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 6 FURNITURE $0 S1,00 ~ $00 $0 $0 $1,000 0 $0 E1,000 WASTEWATER 6b-0481-01 LABORATORY RENOVATION $0 0 $21,000 $$0 $0 WASTEWATER 96-0481-02 DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM $22,000 $0 $0 $22,000 WASTEWATER $I) $5 ;6,000 0 $0 $6,000 D8-0481-09 WATERSHED MONITORING EQUIP Zl! ;7,000 $ i0 ;0 i7,600 WASTEWATER 96-0481-04 FOURIER TRANSFORMED/INFRARED SPEC $38,000 $0 $0 WA$ WATER "-""I PR" _,AT4 "TOQUfpMENT $0 $38.000 I $14,000 $0 $0 $14100u PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1998-97 WASTEWATER 97-0451-01 " MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FURN $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $1,000 WASTOWA'CEIfi' 97-047041 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $0 $21,000 $0 $44,000 WASTEWATER 97-0470-02 LIFT STATION RENOVATION $14,000 $0 "5! ooo WASTEWATEA 97.40470-0 UFT S7AT" SCADA $0 0 114,000 0 $11,000 $0 0 $14,000 WASTEWATER 97-0070-06 COVERED SERVICE VEHICLE PARKING $y1,0000 $0 $0 50 $yl,ppp W40TEWATIM 974447047 TREATME'NTPAVED ROAD $28,000 $0 $0 $0 $26,000 WASTEWATER 974470006 WWTP UPGRADE - 16 MGD $2,440,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,440,000 WASTEWATER 01.0474-01 OVERSIZE SEWERUNE$ :1001000 $0 =0 >j4 $440,000 WASTEWATER 97-0471-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $46,000 WASTEWATER 974471-08 SEWER TAPS $0 $0 $28,000 $0 $20,000 WASTEWATER 97-0471-04 REPLACE SEWERLINE STREET PROGRAM $0 $160,000 $0 WASTEWATER' ST-0471-03 REPL MISC~ SEWEALINES (1997) $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $160,000 WASTEWATER 97-0471-06 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWERLINES $0 $180'000 WASTEWATER 97-,0471-07 UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR (1897) 011,000 0 $250'0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $51 $260,000 WASTEWATER 97-0471-09 INFILTRATION INFLOW CORRECTION i'000 J WASTEWATER 974471H05 REPL, MISC. SEWERUNES (1998) ~1~'O$0 $150,000 $0 i0 $160,000 WASTEWATER 97-04711108 UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR (1996) $871,000 i0 $161,000 WASTEWATER 97-0472-01 FIELD EQUIPMENT $0 $0 $0 $ $1,000 $0 $1,040 ;0 ;0 41,000 i 1993--97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMk 'NT PLAN LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) 29-Apr-92 (ALL YEARS) 010 Ivor" Nwwr ' N(lAfB R Po BOyVD CuRR.&ff AID-IN ! ? FUND REVENUE Q(JMV,STR OTJdE tOrAL WASTEWATER 97-0472-02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 6 FURNITURE $ 0 ~ 1000 WA AT q 97^0411•-01, LA000 010OQUIPMi;NT$0 so $1,000 WASTEWATER 97-M81-02 WATERSHED MONITORING $0 i2(+p0 $0 $0 49!9 -0 WAoTEWAT.1i g7- MIt*tl Q~y~N i0 $4,000 Mc Mr SYSTEM $o $0 ;4,000 WASTEWATER 97-048f-04 SAMPUNQ tQ1161IPlr1ENT $1.000 $p Q $0 PING $6 to MD LE ac IPMENl ;o sfz,0G0 $1,000 WASTEWATER 97-0481-08 ADMINISTRATION BLDG RENOVATIONS $0 $12.9m $40,000 W YV Tit 117-041 . a1 UMPLM EQUIPMEN 00 $0 $0 i4o,oo0 WASTEWATER 97-0483-02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE $$10' $101"a WAOUWl►'t" 07-0" 9lItWINQ 1 0QVl1' 50 $6 000 $0 WASTEWATER 97-0483-04 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $to,(" $0 $0 16,000 $0 518,000 $0 so $94'0 $16.000 ,,,I /kff ,:aunntG ,-Awn .r,.ruzsu eawa(p Y1N4nM t1~Y,lLy Id+il#ro @~MVWiI 9-'1YNR8-i 6'FSt+~A7: r, W1G!C3 Si`.'P+S#iV Fsafikk .SW.U „V4.t5'i ..tSii+d?I A/..1`ti=E' V.Ak4S f,~'$4tY [,W9[YU 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) (ALL YEARS) 30-Apr-92 REQUESTING PROJECT PRQJECT RAPT NUMBER ~~~.}rj~IPTfON BOND CURRENT AID-IN FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER TOTAL PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1992-93 SOUP WASTE "-0400..01 MISGEL. QFFICI~ SUPPORT EQUIPMENT SOLID WASTE 93-0800-02 NEW PERSONAL COMPUTER $0 $2,000 $0 $0 b, SOLID WASTE 95-0$00.04 CITY CANNEL BROADCASTING $O $5,000 $0 $0 ` 0" SOLID WASTE 93-0801001 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $30'~ $0 000 SPUD WASTE 93-0801a42 MOD" EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $13,000 S0 $01 AO SOLID WASTE 93-0801-t03 TRUCK WASH FACILITY $0 $13,000 $0 0 S0 $0 $8, $1 , 000 SOUP WASTF. 99-001-04 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT' $0 $ 1 ,000 S 0 $ 1I SOLID WASTE 93-0802001 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) ROLL OFF TRUCK $0 11.000 $0 000 SOLID WASTE 92-002002 MCBILE EQUIPMENT--(R) ROLI.OFF TRUCK $0 $17,000 $a $p 174 SOLID WASTE 93-0802-04 EQUIPMENT-FRONTLOAD DUMPSTERS $0 $ 0,000 $0 $0 $17,000 SOLID WASTE 93-(1002..06 EQUIPMENT-ROLLOFPS $0 $20,000 $0 $0 117,000 SOLID WASTE 93-0802-08 DUMPSTERS $0 $24,040 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 SOLID WASTE 93-0402-0r COAAPAGfAR 50 $lo,ooo $26,00 SOLID WASTE 93-0802-08 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT S0 $1,000 $a $0 $0 $10,000 SOLID WASTE 03-480841 MOBILE EQUIPMt~N7•i~i) PICKUP TRUCK $15,000 i0 $f! $15 AQ4 SOLID WASTE 93-0803-03 NEW PERSONAL COMPUTER $a $0 $10 16,,000 000 $0 $0 1!0, $0 $10, 10, 000 SOLID WASTE 93-0404-04 WATER PUMP AND HOSE $1500 000 SOLID WASTE 93-0803E12 EXPAND LANDFILL (ENGINEERING) $0 $1a,A$0 $0 s S0 0 ,000 SOMA WASTE 99-QJIQ9-i4; MISGEi l AhfEPus OFFICE EQUIPMENT $35,o00 $0 $0 i0 ;18,AQQ $1 $0 F1,000 $0 $Q 51[000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1993-94 SOLID WASTE 94-0800-01 MISCEL. OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT SOLID WASTE 94-0000..02 UPGRADE RADIO SYSTEM TO 900 MGHTZ $0 $4,000 $0 SOLID WASTE 94-0800-03 800 MEGAHERTZ HANDHELD RADIO $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $3,000 SOLID WASTE 94-0401!01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $2,000 $0 $0 14,000 SOLID WASTE 94-0801!02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $12'000 $0 $0 $2,000 000 [ SOLID WASTE 94-0901..03 M(SCE'LLANEL)US OFFICE EQUIPMEMT $0 $0 $ $11,,060 $ $000 00 $0 $0 $$112,000 $O $1,Opq ..rte .-/,1101~ 30.•Apr-82 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) (ALL YEARS) PROJECT PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN [REQU98:TING T1ON FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER TO~At T NUMBER SOLID WASTE 94-0801e01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $23,000 $0 $0 $23,000 UCK $0 SOLID WASTE 94-0601902 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) FRONT LOAD TRUC $0 519,000 $0 $0 $19,000 SOLID WASTE 84-0802101 MOB ;0 $25,000 $O $0 $26,000 SOLID WASTE 94-080242 EQUIPM -FRONTLOAD DUMPSTERS ,000 $0 $0 $26,000 SOLID WASTE 94-0802-03 DUMPSTER SCREENING $0 $0 $25$18,000 $0 $0 $15,000 SOUR WASTE $4-0002-06 EQUIP-MISCELLANEOUS DUMPSTFRS $o $17,000 $0 $0 $17,000 SOLID WASTE 94-0802-OB EQUIPMENT-COMPACTOR $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $1,000 SOLID WASTE 94-0802-07 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT $33,000 SOLID WASTE 94-0802901 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) ROLL OFF TRUCK $D E33J~ $0 $0 $0$0 $0 $33,000 SOUP WASTE 94-M2092 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) ROLLQFF TRUCK $0 $33,000 $0 $33,000 SOLID WASTE 94-0803t01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) SCRAPER $0 i33 ~ $0 $0 $42,000 SOLID WASTE 94-003-03 FLEXIBLE MEMBRANE LINER $0 $46,000 $0 $0 $42,000 SOLID WASTE 94-0803404 LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM $0 i1 ~ ;0 $0 $6,000 SOLD WASTE 94-0603-0 MISCRUANSOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT ilao,ooo $o $0 $0 $1$1,00a SOLID WASTE 94-0803E06 EXPAND LANDFILL (ENGINEERING) $$0 $0 80 SOLD WASTE 94-0603-07 ALT. R4SP, FAO..•PESIQN & CONST, 00 $30,0$0 $0 $0 $sa,o0 SOLID WASTE 94-0803-08 FENCING i0 ,000 $0 $0 30000 WWP WASTE 94-0503-0R PAVE LANDFILL, PAR' 0NG AND PUBLIC DISP $0 $5 000 $0 $0 $6,000 SOLID WASTE 94-0603-10 STRAW MULCH LANDFILL $100,000 $410,000 $0 $0 $510,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1994-95 $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $3,000 SOUR WASTE 95-0600-01 MISCSI.OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT $o $13,000 ~ $0 $0 0 1,000 SOLID WASTE 95-mlool MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $13,000 $O SOLID WASTE 115-0501902 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK ,000 $O i0 il,ooo SOLID WASTE 95-0801-03 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT $o $1 ;0 $0 $$1,000 SOUP WASTE 95-0601 eC i MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $23,000 $0 $0 $23,000 SOLID WASTE 95-0801902 MOBILE EQUIPMENT'-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK ~ $0 $23,000 $0 $24,000 SOLIO WASTE 95-0401101 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $24,000 $0 $0 $24,000 SOLID WASTE 95-0801102 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(P) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $24,000 t 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 30-Apr-92 LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) (ALL YEARS) REQUE$rINO PROJECT PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN DEPT NUMBER n~RTION FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER TOTA4 f i,t SOLID WASTE 94-0801e01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $23,000 $0 $0 $23,000 SOLID WASTE 94-M102 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $23,000 $0 $0 1,23,000 SOLID WASTE 94-0802f01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) FRONT LOAD TRUC $0 $19,000 $0 $0 $19,000 SOLID WASTE 94-0902-02 EQUIPMENT-FRONTLQAD DUMPSTER.S $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $26,000 SOLID WASTE 94-0802-03 DUMPSTER SCREENING $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $26,000 SOLID WASTE 94-0602-05 EQUIP-MISCELLANEOU$ DUMPSTERS $0 $18,000 $0 $0 $16,000 SOLID WASTE 94-0802-08 EQUIPMENT-COMPACTOR $0 $17,000 $0 $0 $17,000 SOLID WASTE 94-0802-07 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $1,000 SOLID WASTE 94-0802901 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) ROLL OFF TRUCK $0 $33,000 $0 $0 $33,000 SOLID WASTE 94»0902002 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) ROLLOFF TRUCK $0 $33,000 $0 $0 $33,000 SOLID WASTE 94-0803101 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) SCRAPER $0 $33,000 $0 $0 $33,000 SOUP WASTE 94-0803-03 FLEXIBLE MEMBRANE LINER $0 $•42,000 $0 $0 $42,000 SOLID WASTE 94-0803-04 LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM $0 $46,000 $0 $0 $46,000 SOUL? WASTE 04-0045 MISCOLL,ANEWS OFFICE EQUIPMENT $0 PAN $0 $0 $14000 SOLID WASTE 94-0803E06 EXPAND LANDFILL (ENGINEERING) $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 SOUP WASTE $4-080"1 ALT. QISP. ~%AC,-DESION 6 CONST, $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SOLID WASTE 94-080-08 FENCING $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $30,000 SWD WASTE $4-0809-0>i PAVE LANDFILL PARKING AND PUBLIC DISP $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $3,000 SOLID WASTE 94-0803-10 STRAW MULCH LANDFILL $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $5,000 $100,000 $410,000 $0 $0 $610,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR IP94-96 SOUP WASTE 900-01 MISCEL, OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $3,000 SOUP WASTE 96-0801901 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $13,000 $0 $0 $13,000 SOLID WASTE, 96-0I101g02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $13,000 $0 $0 $13,000 SOUP WASTE 96-0801-03 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $1,000 SOUP WASTE 0-0801001 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $23,000 $0 $0 $4000 SOLID t PASTE 95-0801002 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK a, $0 $23,000 $0 $0 $23,000 SOLID WASTE 96-NOIM1 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $24,000 $0 $0 $24,000 SOLID WASTE 96-0801102 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR'- _jAD TRUCK $0 $24,000 $0 $0 $24,000 "Mr, r '1: y,1; r'LVfi:SC /crywcq. tptyUlY r-!1.110, pAMtias ,m f rp»tnc.• 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED 30-Apr-92 (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) (ALL YEARS) REQUESTING PROJECT PROJECT BOND CURRENTT AID-IN DEPT NUMBER DaSOR,IPTION FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER TOTAf SOLID WASTE 964802g01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) ROLLOFF TRUCK $0 5171000 $0 $0 _ $17.000 SOLID WASTE 95-0802-02 EQUIP-MISC. DUMPSTERS AND CONT. $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $40,000 SOLID WASTE U 080243 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $1,000 SOLID WASTE 95-0802001 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) ROLL OFF TRUCK $0 $33,000 $0 $0 $33,000 SOLID WASTE 96-0802002 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) ROLLOFF TRUCK $0 $33,000 $0 $0 $33,0011 SOLID WASTE 95-0802f01 MOJiLE EQUIPMENT-(R) FRONT LOAD TRUC $0 $37,000 $0 $0 $37,000 SOLID WASTE 954803;01 OVERHAUL TRACK LOADER $0 $17,000 $0 $0 $17,000 SOLID WASTE 95-0803-02 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $1,000 SOLID WASTE 954803503 EXPAND LANDFILL (CONSTRUCTION) $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 SOLID WASTE 95-0803101 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) SCRAPER $0 $66,000 $0 $0 $66,000 SOLID WASTE 96.0803-03 CASON TSETH FOR COMPACTOR $0 $14,000 $0 $0 $14,000 SOLID WASTE 95-0803-05 STRAW MULCH LANDFILL $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $5,000 $3,200,000 $388,000 $0 $0 $3,588,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1995-96 SOLID WASTE 9"800-01 MISCEL. OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT $0 $4,000 $0 $0 $4,000 SOLID WASTE 96-08011101 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $13,000 $0 SWD WASTE 96-M11102 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $13.000 SOLID WASTE b8-0801-03 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT $0 ;)$1,000 so 31~ $0 $0 $13,0QQ $OLID WASTE &8-Qd01.04 UPGRADE RADIO SYSTEM TO 800 Mf:CiAHER $0 $20,00,0 $0 $0 $1,000 SOLID WASTE 96-0801001 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R REAR LOAD TRUCK ^ $0 $20.00 ) $0 $12,000 wtl $0 $12,000 SOLID WASTE 06-0801002 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) RSAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $12.000 $0 $0 $12,000 SOLID WASTE 96-0801101 MOOLE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $24,000 $0 $0 $24,000 SOLID WASTE 8b--Wlf02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LQ/~n TRUCK $0 $24,000 $0 $0 $24,000 SOLID WASTE 96-0801g01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $25,000 SOLID WASTE 98-0801gQ2 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $26,000 SOLID WASTE 96-08021101 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) FRONT LOAD TRUC $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000 SOLID WASTE 96-080?-02 EQUIP-MISC. DUMPSTERS AND CONT. ;,in~xt'•'+ . $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $30,000 SOLID WASTE 96-0602-03 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $1,000 SOLID WASTE 95-0002-111 UPGRADE RADIO SYSTEM TO $00 MEGAHER $0 $26,000 $0 $0 $26,000 1993-97 CAPITAL, IMPROVEMENT PLAN 30-APT-92 LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) (ALL YEARS) RI QUESTINQ PROJECT PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN OEPT NUMBER PTIQN FUND REVENUE CQNSTR OTHER TOTAL 4 t 4, SOLID WASTE 96-0802001 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) ROLL OFF TRUCK $0 $17,000 $0 $0 $17,000 SOLID WASTE 98-0802002 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) ROLLOFF TRUCK so $171000 $0 $0 $17,000 SOLID WASTE 98-0802101 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) FRONT LOAD TRUC $0 $37,D00 $0 $0 $37,000 SOLID WASTE A8-0602901 MOBILE 9QUIPMF.NT-(R) RQL.LOFF TRUCK $0 $36,000 $0 $0 $36,000 SOLID WASTE 98-0803-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $2,000 SOLW WASTE 96-0803f01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) SCRAPER $0 $66,000 $0 $Q $06,000 SOLID WASTE 96-060302 STRAW MULCH LANDFILL $0 $13,000 $0 $0 $13,000 SOLID WASTE 98-0903-03 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) WATER TRUCK $0 $4,000 $0 $0 $4,000 SOLID WASTE 964803-04 UPGRADE RADIO SYSTEM TO 800 MGHTZ $0 0,000 $0 $0 $8,000 $0 $449,000 $0 $0 $449,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1996-97 SOLID WASTE ` 97.00"ll 'MISCEL.'OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $51000 SOLID WASTE 97-0801101 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $13,000 $0 $0 $13,000 SOLID WASTE 97-09Q1-02 MISCFLtANSAU$ OFFICE EQUIPMENT $0 $1,000 $0 $0 CAM SOLID WASTE 97-0801101 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $12,000 $0 $0 $12,000 SOLID WAS 97-W1102 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $12,000 $0 $0 ;12,000 SOLID WASTE 97-0801801 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $25,000 SOLID WA 97-0A0190 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK, $0 $26.000 $0 $0 $264000 SOLID WASTE 97-0801h01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $25,D00 SOUO WASTE 97-08004; MOBILE EQUIPM"T-(R) REAR LOAD TRUCK $0 $26,000 $0 $0 $26,000 SOLID WASTE 97-0802101 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) FRONT LOAD TRUC $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000 SOLID WASTE 97.0802-01 EQUIP-MISC. DUMPSTERS AND CANT, $0 $30.00 $0 $0 $30,000 SOLID WASTE 97-0802-02 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $1,000 SOLID WASTE 97-W2W$ MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) FRONT LOAD TRUC $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $40,000 SOLID WASTE 97-0802f01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) FRONT LOAD TRUC $0 $19,000 $0 $0 $19,000 SOLID WASTE 07.0002901 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) ROLLOFF TRUCK $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $38,000 SOLID WASTE 97-0803-01 MISCELLANEOUS BUILDING IMPROVF.M, $0 $6,000 $0 $0 $6,000 SOLID WASTE 97-0803101 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) SCRAPER $0 $66,000 $0 $0 $66.00 SOLID WASTE 97-0803-02 STRAW MULCH LANDFILL $0 $51000 $0 $0 $5,000 ,.n wie a omm" KAVM emu" mswm 6FOWN va" WAM 06M 4mm PAM I: W 4 am" f cqe~ 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN LISTING OF PROJECTS RIEQUESTt' D (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) 30-Apr-82 (ALL YEARS) REQUEST/NO PROJECT PF'OJECT T BOND CURRENT RAID-IN ~T OEPT NUMBER ~WRIPTION FUND REVENUE CONSM OTHE'H TOTAL SOLID WASTE 97-0003-03 WATER SPRINKLER SYSTEM $0 $10,000 $0 $0 ;t0,A0A $0 $376,000 $0 $0 $376,000 I 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (ALL YEARS) PROJECTS REQUESTED (AF`?ROVED By PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) 30-Aµr-92 EfEQrUES TINC ~ PRcuecr NUA(BER pRa/ CT T/ON _ BOND CURRENT AID-IN PROJEC FUND REVENUE TS PROPOSED FOR CONSrr, DRAINAGE 1882-83 OTHEq TQrAI DRAINAGE 83_0810-04 QUIP-(R) 3/4 TON PICKUP DRAINAGE 83-Qdfp.pS AVENUEO $0 DRAINAGE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN $139,000 114,000 90 DRAINAGE 93-0810-08 PECAN CREEK - BRADSKAW $0 #p $f ,000 83-Oafp pT COOPER CREEK $62,000 $0 $0 SO $f38000 EAST nRAINACE 9349,000 $0 90 #i $82,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOP? 1988-94 990,000 $o DRAINAGE $630,000 94 90 0 $ 00 ,000 DRAINAGE 84-0810FOi MOBIL6EQUjp_(R)TRACKHOE 911,000 $U 94 1SO 000 DRAINAGE 6"10-02 Mf AND SERVICES 90 $644,000 94-0810-03 ~'Ef" MATERIALS AND $O DRAINAGE 1M HYDROMULCHING $0 $13,000 $0 DRAINAGE 'pSipF 5 COOPER CREEK DRAINAGE » PHASE 1 120,000 $0 $0 $f 3,000 bRAINAO!~ ~-08f OFOb COOPER CREEK DRAINAGE - PHASE If 90 $20,000 $U 90 ;20pOp >~4-pSfA~OA MOp11EEAUIP-(N}SfptM $2$0,000 #p 90 $20,00o PROJECTS P BOOM MOWER $260:000 $0 so4 S4 $260400 DRAINAGE 'ROPOSED FOR 19$4-86 $0 $12,000 $0 $0 $260,000 - 9500,040 165,000 90 $12,000 96-0810FOI MOBILE EQUIP GRADALL i0 DRAIAINAGfz _ AS-08t0-02 MISCEL. MATERIALS AND SERVICES $0 $665.000 DRAIN 85-Ogt $26,000 DDfaA} GE HYDROMUICF}fNG 30 DRAINAGE 8S"~1~# MOBILE EQUIP . A 1$5,040 $0 $0 $26,000 86-0810F08 COOPER CREEK DRAIN~QFQFIPAHDq I 90 $20,000 $0 0 #26,0A4 D Q~ aS-0410FA7 Coop . aR 10 $0 ~K DRAINAGE. Pff $466,000 $Q 17$,400 $75,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1986-96 ASE fl ;466,000 90 $0 9$68,0 56,000 DRAINAGE 9912,004 $0 $0 $0 00 DRAINAGE IgF01 MOBILE EQUIP - 970,000 $0 $75,000 DRAINAGE. ,040 $1,lS0 78,000 98-08101102 MOBILEE'QUfP-(R)BACKHOE L ' #0 DRAINAGE 10-03 MISCEI„MATERIALS AND,64PVICES $25,004 $0 DRAINAGE . x"0810-04 NYDROMUICHINQ s0 $6,000 $0 90 06,000 > -Q8i0EGf MOBILE EQUIP-.(t~) SIDE BOOM MOWER 10 Ur X40 $0 $6,000 $20,000 $0 $0 924,000 112,000 $00 90 920,004 • #4 #12,000 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 30-Apr-92 LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) (ALL YEARS) REQUESTfNQ PROJECT PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN VEPT NUMBER 7lON FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER TOTAL PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1992-93 DRAINAGE 93-0410-01 MOBILE EQUIP-(R) 314 TON PICKUP $0 $14,000 $0 $0 $14,000 DRAINAGE 93--0810-04 AVENUE 0 $139,000 $0 $0 $0 $139,000 DRAINAGE 00-011045 DOWNT"N MASTER Pl-AN $52,000 $0 $0 $0 $52,004 DRAINAGE 93-0810-06 PECAN CREEK - BRADSHAW $349,000 $0 $0 s0 $349,000 DRAINAGE 03-061047 COOPER CREEK FAST DRAINAGE $90,000 $0 $0 $0 4".000 $630,000 $14,000 $0 $0 $644,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1985-04 DRAINAGE 94-0810F01 MOBILE EQUIP - (R) TRACKHOE $0 $13,000 $0 $0 $18,000 DRAINAGE 04-OS10-02 MISOEL. MATERIALS AND SERVICES $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000 DRAINAGE 94-0810-03 HYDROMULCHING $0 $20,000 s0 $0 $20,000 DRAINAGE 944010F04 : COOPER CREEK DRAINAGE - PHASE ( $260,000 $0 $0 $0 $260,00 DRAINAGE 94-0810F06 COOPER CREEK DRAINAGE - PHASE II $260,000 $0 $0 $0 $260,000 DRAINAGE 44-091GE0$ MOBILE EQUIP-N) SIDE BCQM MOWER so $12,000 $0 $600,000 $66,000 $0 $$12,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1994-95 DRAINAGE 96-0810F01 MOBILE EQUIP - (R) GRADALL $0 $26,000 $0 $0 $26,000 DRAINAGE 0"10-02 MISCEL MATERIALS AND SERVICES $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $26,000 DRAINAGE 96-0810-03 HYDROMULCHING $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000 DRAINAGE 06-081045 , MOBILE EQUIP-(R) MOTOROMER $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $76,000 DRAINAGE 96-0810F06 COOPER CREEK DRAINAGE - PHASE I $456,000 $0 $0 $0 $466,000 DR,AINAQE 954610F07 CO1?Pq GREEK DRAINAGE - PHASE II $456,000 $0 $0 $0 4464,000 $912,000 $70,000 so $76,000 $1,067,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1996-96 DRAINAGE 96-08101201 MOBILE 0UIP - (R) GRADALL $0 $26,000 $0 $0 $26,000 DRAINAGE 96-081002 MOBILE EQUIP-(R) BACKHOE $0 $6,000 $0 $0 $6,000 DRAINAGE 98-081043 MISGEL, MATERIALS AND SERVICES c#~ $0 $26,000 $0 $0 $26,000 DRAINAGE 96-0810-04 HYDROMULCHING $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000 DRAINi t)l 96-0810901 MOBILE EQUIP-(N) SIDE BOOM MOWER $0 $12,000 $0 $0 $12,000 tm - a R#}pt1 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) 30-Apr-92 (ALL YEARS) LDfp UFS T/NG FRGUEC7' PRQIECT T NUiSIBEp AF'~~pTlON BOND CURRENT AID-IN FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER rOTA4 DRAINAGE 96-0810-06 PECAN CREEK - KERLEY TO WOODROW DRAINAGE 0"6101-107 MQBILE EQ.-(R) 12 YO, DUMP TRUCK $ $1,000,0$0 0 $6,000 $ i0 0 $0 $0 $0 o $1,000,000 i0 $8,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1996-97 $1,000,000 $94,000 $0 $O $1,084,000 DRAINAGE 97-OSIOFOi MOBILE EQUIP - (R) GRADALL DRAINAGE 97-081002 MOBILE EQUIP-(R) BACKHOE $0 $26,000 $0 $0 $25,000 DRAINAGE 97-0810-03 MISC L. MATERIALS AND SERVICES $o $12,000 $0 $o $12,000 DRAINAGE 97-0810-04 HYDROMUL.OHING $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $20,0pQ DRAINAGE 97-0810105 MOBILE EQ-(R) RUBBER TIRE LOADER $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000 DRAINAGE 97-0810E01 MOBILE EQUIP-(N) SIDE BOOM MOWER $0 $11,000 $0 $0 511,E DRAINAGE 07-OBIOH05 MOBILE EQUIP (R) STREET SWEEPER $0 $6,000 $0 $0 $6,000 DRAINAGE 97-0810H07 MOBILE EQ.-(R) 12 YD, DUMP TRUCK $0 $2,~ $0 $0 $32,000 DRAINAGE' 97.0810-0 PECAN CREEK- ROBERTSON ST. $607,000 $i0 $12,000000 12, $0 0 $0 $ 50 $0 0 $12,000 $827,000 C 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 30-Apr-92 LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES HOARD) (ALL YEARS) REOUESTINQ PROJECT PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN DEPT NUMBER qTI IPTION FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER TOTAL $607,000 $141,000 $0 $0 $748,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1992-93 FLEET SERVICES "580-01 NEW EMISSION CONTROL ANALYZER $0 $4,000 $0 $0 $4,000 FLEET SERVICES 93-0580-02 FUEL TANK OVERFILL BUCKETS $0 $4,000 $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $8,000 $0 $0 $8,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1993-94 FLEET S£RWCES 94-058"ll RSPWE TIRE CHANGE MACHINE $0 $8,000 $0 $0 olm FLEET SERVICES 94-0580-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT-(R) PARTS TRUCK $0 $16,000. $0 $0 $15,000 FI.W SERVICE$ "4580-09 ANTIFRREZ.g RECOVERY SYSTEM $0 $4,000 $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $25,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1994-95 FLEET SERVICES 854580-01 MOBILE EQUIP-(R) SERVICE TRUCK $0 $16,000 $0 $0 16,000 FLEET SERVICES 95-0580-02 REPLACE TWO TRANSMISSION JACKS $0 $8,000 $0 $0 $8,000 $0 $22,000 $0 $0 $22,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1995-96 FLEET SERVICES 0b-0580-01 REPLACE AIR COMPRESSOR $0 681000 $0 $0 $4,000 FLEET SERVICES 96-0580-02 NEW FLEET MAINTENANCE CENTER $0 $250,000 $0 $400,000 $650,000 $0 $256,000 $0 $400,000 $656,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1996-97 FL OLERV.I,CES 97-0580-01 REPLAOR TIRE BALANCE MACHINE $0 $1Q.000 $0 $0 $10,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1992-93 MAO"INI» SFIQP 994581-01 REPLACE WIR4 WELDER $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $2,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1993-94 MACHINE SHOP 94-0581-01 REPLACE WIRI5 WELDER $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $3,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1994-95 MACHINE SNAP 95-0581-01 WELPINQ EQUIPMENT AND GAUGES $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $2,00 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 30-Apr-92 LISTING OF PROJECTS REQUESTED (APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD) (ALL YEARS) REQUESTING PROJECT PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN DEPT NUMBER Df$G1111PTION FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER TOTAL PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1995-96 MACHINE SHOP 96-0661-01 MISQFL. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT $0 $2,000 $0 $D $2,000 PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR 1998-97 WELDING TRUCK $016,000 1>0 $O $16,000 MACHINE SHOP 97-0591-01 MOBILE EQUIP-(R) F ~ L~ .,4 ~~,,t~., ~~~.~9' T ~ 5993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL GOVERNMENT ANNUAL AID OPERATING DMSIONI PROJECT BOND IN AND DEPARTMENT NUMBER PROIECI' NAME FUNDS CONSTRUCTIQN OTHER TOTAL. MAINTENANCE 1942-93 PROPOSED 0 • DRAINAOE 061003 W`a.$DN-MORSE-AI.EWDER AREA 0 103,000 103,000 • AIRPORT 001902 1000 FOOT RUNWAY EXTENSION-SOUTH 125,000 1,124,000 1,249,000 PART MC OW11 PARR DAVEWPMENT SOUTII 500,000 500,004 1,000,000 PARK/REC OD012 PARK ACQUISrMN NORTHEAST - LAND 200,000 200,000 5,000 POL,IGB WWI LAW WOORCEMENIT GEMEWCOMPIXX 2,407,000A 2,407,000 - :3M2 00-0 I4,9, ,000 s,x► *t.PPR PRIOR YEAR r 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: C.Lp - M a Pro ecl: WILSON, MORSE, ALEXANDER DRAIANrE CHANNELS Pro ect Number: 0810-05 Estimated Cost; $103,000 Project, Descriptlon: COMPLETE ALEXANDER ST. DRAINAGE BEGUN IN 1990 BY ADDING REST OF STORM SEWER TO MORSE, CONCRETE OVERFLOW CHANNEL, AND PIPE IN PARK AT OUTFLOW, enellislPufpo44 _ (RELIEVE LOCALIZED FLOODING PROBLEMS AND REGAIN PARK LAND, Task 60edule (MonUVYear) Deal n Bid Construct Completed !ad Innl Date; APR-93 JUN-93 Endln Dots: MAY-93 SEP-93 Construction Fundln schedule $1,000's) FundiD Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds - SU AultVUnissued Bonds $0 Aid In Const, $0 Other $103 _ $103 Total-Unauthorized ' $0 $103 sQ _ 50 , $0 s0 $103 Construction Fundln Costs d1,000's Costs Soufco Prior ! 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 9E-97 Totai Services 56 - Ss Land $0 Construction $97 $97 Other _ $0 Total 50 $103 _ SQ $0 so 50 $103 Operating Su dot Costa i1,000's Ex enditure T e _ 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total _ e _ Personal Services $O Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets _ Total _ $0 $0 5 - $0 $0 $0 ....rb, ..,a,~.. e.m....«x ,svweai .-~u.+i :anaui~ r aGkXF €s~> x'k u? g b14~'3t; E.'3WM MWI A YY,.~W UbAw 6'~N9ir90 000" BIB{ NNrlnsl 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fond: C.I.P. Funds_ _ Project; 1000FT RUNWAY EX7 SOUTH , Pro ct Number: 001902 Estimated Cost: $1,248,600 Projapt Description; EXTEND THE SOUTH RUNWAY 8Y 1000 FEET. _ 90% FEDERAL FUNDING 10% CITY FUNDING _ - - Benefits PPorpA TO IMPROVE THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 0 THE DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. Task Sghaduia (Mcnth/Year) Design Bid Construct Completed Be Innln$_Data: 1993 1993 993 Sndlng Date: 1998 1993 199-1993 Construction Fundln Schedule $1,000's) Funding Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds - --W. - - - $a AulhJUnissued Bonds $a Ald in Const, $1,124 $1,124 Other C,O,'s _ $125 $125_ Total $0 $1,249 $0 SO $0 - $o w $1,249 Construction Funding Costs $1,000's _ wabill Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 - 96-97 Total R Services - - - -$0 Land $0 Construction $1,249 $1,249 Other $0 Tote! - $0 $1,249 -_-$0 $0 - $0 - $0 - $1,249 Q ratin Bud el Costs $1,000'9 _ Expenditure T 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 _ 96-97 - Total _ Personal Services - $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets ya - - - - Total - - - - $0 -----$0 -----$0 $0- 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund, 0063 Pro C PARK DEVELOPMENT -SOUTH - Ma Pro Number. 0863_-11 Eatknated Cost $1,000,060 ProJeGS peacript.w: INITIAL DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW 200 ACRE PARK SITE IN SOUTH DENTON TO INCLUDE BASIC PARK FACILITIES AND ESSENTIAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THESE FACILITIES, HenelltslPurposa THIS PROJECT WILL ADDRESS A CRITICAL NEED FOR PARK & LEISURE SERVICES IN THE AREA AS ARTICULATED BY CITIZENS IN RECENT BOND IMPLEMENTATION MEETINGS. Task $0adule (MorlttVYear) Desl n Bid Construct Completed _ Innln Date; 2-93 9-93 12-93 Endin Dates 9-93 12-93 12-9b 12-95 Construction Fundin Schedule $1,000's =0onnst. ce - Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total s $b00 _ Bonds $600 $500 $0 orized $600 $0 $1,000 $O $0 $0 Construotlpn Fundla Costs *11000'a ` $o - $o - ~i,p0o Goat &quro0 Prior 92-93 93-94 94-96 96-96 96-97 Total Services Land $70 $70 Construction $880 $0 Other-Unauthorized $b0 $$60 Total - _ $50 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1.000 0 ratan tau tCosta $1,000'a 16tt tune T 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-87 Total Personal Services $40 $40 Supplies $8 $8 Maintenance $1 10 0 services $110 Debt Service $17 7 $17 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 - - $o rolal $0 $75 - - - - $75 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund-`-- 0063 - - Rro ect: PARK ACOUlS1TlON - - Pro of Number: __-b6r- 0063-12 NORTHEAST - Lam - EatirnaledCast. $zoo,o'oo Project gea4riptlon: ACQUISITION_OF LAND !N NORTHEAST DENTON~ FOR A COMMUNITY PARK. ~8nef11S/PUfpp&d SERVE THE FUTURE PARK AND LEISURE NEEDS OF CITIZENS IN THE NE AREA OF THE CITY. Task Schedule {MonthlYvar) - -Des! n Bid _ Construct Com leled Be Innin Date' A 1092 6-93 Endln Date: 5-93 12-93 12-93 Constructio _ n F(indln SC he lg $~,p00's Fundin Souroe Prior Existing Bonds 92-93 g3-94 , 84-95 ` - - $260 95.96 96-97 Total Auth/Unissued Bonds Aid In Const. $200 Other-Unauthorized $0 Total $0 a2oo $o - $0 - $200 $o a2 cost tiouroe Construction Fundlr2 0osta ~oo - Prior 92-93 Services 93-94 94-95 S Land erv $10 To_IaI Construction $190 -S I0 Other-Unauthorized $190 Total $o $z0 $o o _ _$o $o - $o - - -a0 0 ralln 9u et Costs $1,OW-8- §o Ex nditure T $200 Personal' Services 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 - - Total Supplies $3 Mr/intenance $1 S3 Services $1 $1 Debt Service $1 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 - - - - - - - - $0 - 5 $0 - $0 _ _ _$`s_ ti 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0040 _ Ma Proect, ` LAW ENFORCEMENT/COURT -COMPLEX--_____ Project ct Number, 004001 Estimated Costs 52,407,000 _ _ P OW. pasalptiolt; PROVIDE RENOVATION OF THE EXISTING MOORE BUILDING TO RELOCATE POLICE DEPT AND MUNICIPAL COURT. ~ettafltslPutppr, ADDRESS EXISTING OVERCROWDING FOR POLICE AND COURTS. PROVIDE B!" t rER SECURITY. PROVIDE FOR FUTURE GROWTH. _ Task Schedule (MonVYear) _ Dest n Bid Construct Completed Beginning Oafei 4-92 10-92 3-93 Ending pate' 10-92 11-92 - 10-93 10-93 Con StrUCII n Fundin Schaduto 51,000's) Fundi Source Prior 02-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds $143 $143 AulhlUnissued Bonds $2,264 $2,264 Aid In Const, $0 other $0 Total $143 $2,264 $0 _ ^ $0 _ $0 $0 _ $2,407 _ Constructlon'Fundin Costs $1,000'8 Cot Source Prior _ _ 92-93 93-94 94-95 - 95-96 96-97 Total Services $143 $143 Land $0 Construction $2,264 $2'264 Other $0 Total $0 $2,407 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,407 0 ratln Hu tCosts $1,000's EX nditure T 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total _ Persona! Services $0 Supoes $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Deb! Service $0 Insurancr. $0 Fixed Assots $0 Total - 50 $0 s0 $0 ,ar.+,- ..yuy. g•nau,:rr. e..uavy... warw.:. 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL GOVERNMENT DIVISION/ PROJECT Alll ANNUAL 1) RTMBNT NUMBI3R PRp1ECT NAil6 BOND IN OPBRATIN(1 AND 199344 PROPOSED ~N_~ CONSTRUCTION OT}IIyR TOTAL LNT ENANCB MA 4 ENGINEERING 001WI UUJAN MOUR SIDEWALKS • ENGINEERING 001002 WILLOWWOOD BIKEWAY/SIDEWALKS 53,000 51,E 4 ENOIKEMNO 0(15004 IN'TERSECTIQN CONTROL SIANALS 152,000 152,000 • ENGINEERING 001005 TURN LANES FOR ARTERIALS 253,000 213,000 « HNGINEERINO 041006 110,000 1,000 L'EAB.STRLAN aIQNALS 110,000 • ENGINEERING 001020 UNIVERSITY DRIVE 13S TO ELM (ROW PORCH) 100.000 m,000 ENOWHERINO OD109i PAYNE DRIVE PAVM 4 SWEWAL.KS 106,000 • PLANNING 001503 LANDSCAPE TEASL.EY LN (535 TO L MILLER) 95,000 306,000 LIBRARY 047002 LIBRARY ODUPIMRIZHO SYFMM 311 1^3'000 211,000 30,000 • PARK/REC 006001 POOL RENOVATION ,000 711,000 1,000,000 PIREIPOUCB 005041 Pam"LICB COMPUTER LW OW OW 1,000,000 to,aoo . 1,s00,000 ►APPR PRIOR YEAR (Z3.Qt1 0.,,~~« mM„ 040 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: ' _ 0010 - - - _ - Ma LILLIAN A~iLLER SIDEWALKS Protect Number 0010-01 - - Estimated Cost; $53,000 - - ProFect Description: 4' CONCRETE SIDEWALK ALONG WEST SIDE OF LILLIAN MILLER FROM IE35E TO TEASLEY LANE Benet{t;lPtifposa; TO PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM SOIITk- RIDGE SUBDIVISION TO MAJOR RETAIL AREA AT IH35E AND LOOP 288 Task Schedule {Month/Year) Design _ Bld- - Construct Com feted Be Innin Data; Q_ APR-94 _~MAY-94 JULY-94 EndinDate; MAY-84 JUNE-94 AUG-94 Construction Fundln Schedufa ~$1_;_000's~ Fundln~SoUrce Priory 92-93 - 93-94 94 95 _ 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds $53 - $53 Auth/Unissued Bonds Aid In Cosst. $0 Other $0 Total $0 $0 $63 $0 $0 $0 _ _ $53 Construotfon Fundln Costs $1,000's LlttbUf Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 96-96 96-97 Total Services $5 _ Lend $5 Construction $48 $0 Other $$0 Total $0 $0____$63--_---- _ $0 $0 $0 -$53 0 ratin 9u et Costsl,D1)p's _ _ _ - - Ex lure T 92-93 93-94 94-96 96-96 96-97 i Total Personal Services - $0 Supplies Maintenance $0 $D Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets Total - - - $0 $0 $0 - _ $0 - - - ~-.,..n.. .~.y.d... .v......... .._•.NSV .+ss~w i~~AY}1 exe4t~~ yetLS~V 6fFfi4'd, =rA.^.ari i`if4~Sii7 riuSi/da i~7t~i ~-Y ~tJi M~MNI lmlk?sti 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund; 0010 - Pro Ct;~ Ma _ ILLOWWOOD 61KEWi 7SIDEWALKS Pro cl Number 0010-02 - E&tlmat@d Cnht $112,350 Pfa)acl q@scliPdon: CONSTRUCT A 5' SIDEWALK AND fFREPATH ALONG WILLOWWOOD STREET (SOUTH SIDE) FROM WYSTERIA TO MCCORMICK - BenefitslPurPA&a; PROVIDE SAFE AREAS FOR PEDESTRIANS ANa BICYCLISTS ALONG WILLOWWOOD ST. INCLUDING SCHOOL ROUTE TO BORMAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Task Schadu!@ (Monthly@ar) _ Desi~ nn 131d Construct Com leted BeginningDat@1- AUG-93 OCT-93 DEC-93 l±ndin data; SEPT-93 NOV-93 JAN-94 - Construction Fundln Schedule $1,000'8) 95 9 - - Fundln Sauroe Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-9fi 96-97 Total Exlsting Bonds - AuthlUnissued Bonds $0 Aid in Conal. $0 Other-Unauthorized $0 _ $112 $112 Total SO so 8112 so $a _ - $112 Construction Fundin Costs $1,000'8 - Lfab I 6ource Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-9fi - 96 97 Total- Services $e - Land $6 Construction S1 $0 Other $100 - $4 Total $0 SO - -$112 - --4 _ ~_~0 $0 0 $112 O rafln Bud otCosfs $1,000's~- rtdlture 7 92-93 93-94 94-95 9b-96 96-97 Total Personal Services - _ Supplies $o- Mainlenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total - - - - 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM C,11231CtPPRJ10010_ Fund; 0010 06/16/92 to ot: INTERSECTION CONTi~OL SIGNALS ProJeGtNumber, 001004__ stimated Cost; $253,050 - Ito I Dow Ion: IN ORDER TO ADDRESS INCR;zASED TRAFFIC i VOLUMES BY PROVIDING CAPACITY AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS, TWO MAJOR INTERSECTIONS SHOULD BE SIGNALIZED, _ I3eY1a11tslPufpgse; `INCREASE MOTORIST SAFETY AT VARIOUS INTERSECTIONS THAT MEET TRAFFIC VOLUME WARRANTS SET FORTH BY THE TEXAS MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. Task Sc dj la {MCntt1/Yaer) Des) n Bid Construct Com leted Ba Innin Da g ---ta - JAN_94 APR-94 JUN-94 nIn Date; MAR-94 MAY 9a DEC-94 Fundin Source ConstruoNan Fundln Scheduls $1,000's) Prior 92-93 Existing Bonds 93-94 94-95 98-97 T ---otal--_ _ Auth/Unlssuad Bonds 1 $0 Aid in Cosst. Other-Unauthorized $0 Total $0 $ 0 $184 $69 - $0 $184 $69 50 $263 Construolivn Fundln Costs $1,000's $0 $253 L~bW SotIr06 Prior 92-93 93-94 Services 94-95 95-96 - - x Land $25 - `97 Total Construction $2 $ t Other $157 $69 $2 $226 Total $0 $0 - $184 $69 -$0 _ 0 ratln Bu at Costa $Z,1)00's - $2n3 $ - - le 7 92-93 93-94 94-95 Personal S Services 95-96 96-97 _ Total-- Supplies ~50 Maintenance Services $1 $1 $0 $1 $1 $4 Debt Service $1 $ 1 $1 $1 $4 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total _ sir,}vi► 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Full 0010 _ Pro t; TURN LANES FOR ARTERIALS Pra ct Number, 0010-05 Estimated Cost: __$110,250 _ Pro)aat Description; CONSTRUCT TURN LANES (LEFT OA RIGHT) AT INTERSECTIONS FOR CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT, n7n 41slPufposa' CAPACITY AND TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENT WHICH REDUCES FUEL COSTS FOR THE MOTORING PUBLIC Task Schedule. (MonthlYear) - _ Desl n B_idConslruct Completed Be inning pate; JAN-94 APR-94 JUN-94 _ EndIng Date; MAR-94MAY-94 DEC44 'Construction Fundln Schedule $1,00076) Funding Source ~ Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds - $p AuMnissued Bonds $p Aid in Const, $p Other-Unauthorized $68 $42 _ $110 Total $0 $0 $68 $42 $0 $p $110 Construction Fundin Costs $1,000's U404i 4owQ0 Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Services $6 - $6 Land $2 $2 Construction $60 $42 $102 Other _ $0 Total $0 $0 $68 $42 - $0 $0 ---$110 Operating Bu t Costs 161,000'6 EX rldture Type 92.93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 - T Total Personal Services ' - T $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total - $0 $0 $o ----$O l _ - - $0 - - -$0 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Pro ct: PEDEST_RIAN SIGNALS Ma - Pra at Num4e- ri - ooio-0s- _ Estlmated Cost: $33,600 P(0*4 Description, PROVIDE PEDE_STRIAN SAFETY AT THREE KEY INTERSECTIONS USING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. THERE WILL BE THREE CROSSINGS AT EACH INTERSECTION. 8enetitwFurpose: ? TO PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY GIVING SUFFICIENT WARNING TO THE MOTORING PUBLIC. Task Schadula *M n-/Year) Desi n Bld_ Construct Completed R-94 MAY-94 JUL-94 Be Innin Date: ]A~PR-9444 lEndln pate: JU N-94 DEC-94 Construotlon unoin Scheduie S1,000's) _ Fundln Saone Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 t stns AuttYUnissued Bonds SQ Aid In Const. $0 Other-Unaut horiz~d S17 $0 TotalSO S17 534 S17 S17 - - Construction Fundln costs $1 low's $34 Iat1UI 6ource Prior 92-93 9----~ Servlcea 93-94 94-96 95-96 96-97-- Total- L Construction $15 $17 $Other Land $2 ]-i- Total _ SO 50 S17 - , _ 0 satin u e 1 s 51,S50 50 Ex torn T 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 - 96-97 Total - Personal Services Supplies - - $0 Maintenance $o Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $p Total - - - $0 ---_$0 $0 $0 ~f ~s+xsu+ weayaq= nk'ktttq :F± tia 4't1M'L1 !uAh&.W hOa'yiiY.4 Aru fey teiRai 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM F-C-NPm ooia ROW ASE) ub er; 001020 ed COSe oo,oao eacriptIon; IPATION IN THIS TxDOT PROJECT. urp WIDEN 380 TO B-LANE THOROUGHFANr= TO ADATE HEAVIER TRAFFIC FLOWS. ----Task SGtledule (MnnthlYeurj ` RDe~ slgn Bid construct Com leled tea nnin Data: - - [Ending Data, Constructlon F - -1 Fundin Source Prior n Schedue 51,000's - 92-93 93-94 94-95 Existing ~1-6 Bonds - Aulh/Unissued Bonds $100 Aid In Const, $ $10 Other $0 Total $0 0 $100 $0 Clruction lS$° _ 5100 U0111 Source - Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 9S-96 Services - 96.97 - Total- - Land - Construction $1 $0 Other $100 - $0 Total 00 SU 0 $100 $p - - - - - - a0 $0 $100 Ex diture7 p ratan Bud aI Costs $1,o0i}'s Personal5ervlces _ 92-93 93-94 94-95 - 95-96 96-97 Total Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assols $0 Tolsl 0 0 - - $0 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0010 - ' Pro t: - - PAYNE DRIVE Pro Number 0010-91 - Eetlmated Coat: S3o6,000 PtoJe~t pdeC,IWi~n,- : 'CONSTRUCT PAVfNG, DRAINAGE AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS FROM WESTGATE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION AT WEST MEADOW TO f ONNIE BRAE USING 25' BACK TO BACK SECTION. _ BarfefitslPurpO;pl THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM A MAJOR RESIDENTIAL AREA TO NORTH LAKES PART AND UPGRADE STREET FROM RURAL TO URBAN SECTION. Task $chddule (Montti,rYear) Desf n Bid Construct Com sled In I I DA, 6; OCT-96 JAN-97 Ettdl A4lAI` DEC-96 - MAR-97' FEB-97 MAY-97 Fund t~pur Construction FundIn 040's Prior 92-93 Schedule S1, Existing Bonds 93-94 94-85 96-96 - AulIVUnissued Bonds 96-97 Aid In Const. $0 Other-Unathorized $0 Total ~ $306 SO $0 $0 $306 $0 $306 _$a S0 Construotlon Fund6 Coate a1,000's $306 Prior 92-93 93-94 - i Services 94-95 95-96 - Land $43 96-97 T Total Construction $10 51 Other $263 '5 Total SO _ S253 $0 $30fi St) so 0 ratln su at Costs ;i,000's _ $Q--.-._50 t:X ndlluro.T` ~ 5300 Personal Services 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96--97 Total Supplies - Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $o Fixed Assets $0 Total $O $0 - - - - - - $O ° 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0015 - Pro ct; TEASLEY LANE SF M;2181} ' SUE Pro Oct Number, 001503 - LANDSCAPING - SL EstimatedCpst_ Sz19,4sa ProJect Ddsc~IPIIOn: LANDSCAPING OF TEASLEY LANE, FROM INTERSTATE 35 TO LILLIAN MILLER, fM BEAUTJFICATION OF A MAJOR ENTRANCEWAY. Task Schedyle (Mon ear) _ Design _ Bid Construct Com leted Mlinn Date01!94 03/94 ate, 05194 0~~04/94 -1944 12!94 - Construcilpn Fundin S0- _V1e1,00p's Fundln Source Prior 92_93 _ Existing Bonds 93-94 _ 94-9b'- 95y96 9-6- - - Auth/Unissued Bonds - 97- Total r UnauthlUnlasu Bonds 596 - - - $0 Aid In Const- Grant $95 Other-Unauthorized $123 $0 Total 50 $123 $0 - $0 Uablll Source Construction F ndin Cost $1,00o's) _-50 -tea Services Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 - ` - _ `9b 96-96 96-97 - Land $17 Totsl Construction $17 Other $105 $0 Total $96 $105 50 5218' S4 $96 0 ratin Bud 81 Cosis $1,p00 s~ 50 30 $218 Expenditure TWO 92-93 93_94 -T _ Personal Services 94-86 95-96 96-97 - SupplIes Total Maintenance $0 services $15 50 Debt Service $15 $30 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 $15 _.___515 530 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund. Pro L' LIBRARY COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM Ma Pro Number; 0070-02 es led Cost: 5311.000 Proto Doscflptlon; A COMPUTERIZED CATALOG OF ALL MATERIALS OUSED i H N THE LIBRARY ACCESSIBLE BY SERVERAL TERMINALS FOR PUBLIC AND STAFF USE. 68~ "ts/PUlp0W,,AN ONLINE SYSTEM-Td PROWDE PATRON AND STAFF ACCESS TO ALL MATERIALS INSTEAD OF THE CARD CATALOG SYSTEM. Tas-k Scfiadula (MonthlYear) Design Bid Construct Completed e Innin pate) 10194 01195 Endtn Duet ' 10194 01195 0, Construction Fundin Schedule $1 A00's) _ FUndl Sol~rce Prior _ 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds --$0 Aulh/Unissued Bonds $0 Aid In Conal' $0 Other-Unauthorized $911 $911 Total $0V $0 $311 $0 50 50 $311 Construction Funding Costs $1,000, Coot &otlroe Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Services $0 Land $0 Construction $0 Other-Fixed Asset $311 $311 Total-Fixed Assets s0 $0 $311 $0 SO $0 - - $31111 O ratio Budget costa $1,000's Bx ndllwa;T 92-93 93-94 94-95 85_-96 96-97 Total - Personal Services - $0 Supplles $0 Maintenance $0 Services $o Debt Service $0 insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total - co S0 $0 50 $0 $0 t Ikd~il0 ~A++ ee+.,.a rr ~,s~?rtf rrnswti' ,1*ww" fVOWS i.SYdW,-'i ltiyd~,+ FxF?Y~" t it WWI OM NI 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 00fi3 MqP Pro l: POOL RENOVATION Pro eAl Number: 0060-01 Estimated Cost. $1,000,000 _ ProJect Description: THIS PROJECT WILL ALLOW FOR THE COMPLETE RENOVATION OF THE EXISTING CIVIC CENTER POOL FACILITY. Bondfits/Purpm: ENHANCE AQUATIC RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES FOR DENTON CITIZENS AND RENOVATION OF A FACILTIY THAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN 1966 AND IS IN POOR CONDITION. Task Schedule (MonIWYear) Design Bid Construct Cornpleled se Innln Date: 10/93 6194 10194 Ending Date: 5194 9194 5195 _ 5195 _ Construction FundingSoho A $1,000's _ Fund In Source Prior- 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds $0 Auth/Unissued Bonds $0 Aid In Cosst, $0 Other- U nau lhorized $1,000 $1,000 Total -$0 $0 - --$1,000- so $0 v so - -$1,000 Construction Fundin Costs $1,000's Cost Srouroo Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97- ~ Total Services $50 $50 Land $0 Construction $950 $950 Other $0 Total 50 -_50 $1,000 $0 50 _ $0 $1,000 Operating tau et Costs $1,000's Won retuType 92-93 93-94 94-95 _ 95-96 _ 96-97, Total Personal Services $0 Supplies $2 $2 Maintenance $5 $5 Services $3 $3 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 -$10 Total _ _ $U---- -ao _T $10 $0 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FIRE/POLICE COMPUTER ~M~~--- or, 005o01 Ff- 0050 st $1,500,000 ip)ron: COMPUTE R/MIS FIRFJPOLI CE ose; COMPUTER-AIDED DISPATCHDAA MANAGEMENT; S ACCESS TO DATA; ETC. Task SGhedu[a (MonWear) _ Desi n Bid Construct Completed I3e Innin Date: 1193 4/93 6193 IEndln Date;' 12193 ConT39 so Ule $1,000'6) _ Funding Source Prior 92-94-95 95-9fi 9fi-97 Tota! Existing Bonds AuthlUnlssued Bonds $0 Aid In Const, $0 Other-Unauthorized 00 0 $1500 Total o $,oo $4 $o $1,540 Gonslructlon Fundln Costs f 000's Liabii Woe Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95.96 96-97 Total Services Land $0 $0 Equipment $1,600 Other $1,600 Total __$0 $O $O $1,600 $0 $0 $0 $1,50000 0 ratin IBM Lt Costs $11000'0 Expenditure Typo 92-93 93-94 94-95 _ 95-96 96-97 Total - Personal Services - - Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total ,yawn. v..r,..ry 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OENERALGOVERNMENT - AID On No BOND IN TOTAL FUNDS CONSTRUCTION 17lIIER p1V M Y G 1S10N! PRQIRCT DR ISION, NT WMIBER PROIB4.'4' NAME 638,000 638,000 1,497,000 733,000 1994-95 PROPOSED 001014 STURT REWNSTRUC110N 742,500 744,500 500 000 75,000 swWBURM 007001 LIBRARY PHASE I 250,E 250,000 3 LIBRARY NORTHEAST PARIURBC 006313 PARK DEVEL OPMEW " 399,000 5 5 Wow FAC11.1TY MNOT 00=1 NEW ROOF 5 GENERAL FUND BLDG •APPR PRIOR YEAR 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund, 0010 Ma L )L- Pro t, STREET RECONSTRUCTION_ Project Number. 0010-14 - Estimated Cost: $638,400___ _ Project pewiptlAlY THIS FUNDING WILL ALLOW THE CITY STREET DEPARTMENT TO UNDERTAKE MAJOR REPAIR FOR SHORT SECTIONS OF STREETS UTILIZING RECYLING AND OTHER METHODS. _ Benefits/purpose . "COST EFFECTIVE USE OF CITY MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT CAPABLE OF DOING SMALL STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. Task. 5chadula (MonthlYear) Desl n Bid Construct Com leted F e Innis esDate: MAY-95 ~JUL-95 _ Endi~ Date; JUN-fly _ fiSEP-95 - _ Construclion Fundin Schedule $I,000'$ Funding Source Prior 92-93 _ 93-94 94-95 _ 95-96 96-97 Total Exlsiing Bonds - $0 AutIVUnissudd Bonds $0 Aid in Const. $0 Other-Unauthorized $1336 _ $638 Total $0 s0 $0 $b3d $0 $0 $638 Construction Fundin Cote t►1,000's~ _ _ _ LlaWli ISwroe Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Services $50 $50 Land $0 h" Construction $588 $588 Other $0 " Total $0 s0 $0 $638 $0 ri $638 p ratln tau et Costs >5100's Ex nditure Type 92-93 93-94 94-95 _ 95-96- 96-97 Total Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services s0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 $0 50 $p------ $0 $0 .-,.;,,,,,,h ruW .si veasN'n 1. A%1+ VadN7M i5Y1614Yfl4 k tu: sya(w>t raa~FS.w LAaitdr p'7k,eq C.w" KUNOW 1nr 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund, 0070 Ma Pro t: LIBRARY PHASE I Pro Number 0070-01 - Estimated Cast; $1,467,000 - - Pro)W Dascriptlon, NEW BUILDING 15,000 SQ FT ON 7 ACRES OF LAND. BenafltslPufposat TO PROVIDE QUALITY LIBRARY SERVICES TO RESIDENTS IN A HEAVILY POPULATED REGION OUTSIDE OF THE CENTRAL AREA. Task-Schedule (MonthlYear) Design Bid Construct Completed Beginnin-o~a.~te., 1-01-92 4-01-96 10-01-96 1lufinoDate: - 11-10-92 4-05-96 10-111-96 10-11-96 Construction Funding Schedule F undl &ouroa Prior 92-93 93..94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds $107 $60.5 $167.6 Auth/Unissued Bonds $575.0 $575.0 Aid in Const. $744.5 $744.6 Other $0.0 Total $0 -$107 $1,380 ___-$0 $1,487 Construction Fundin Costa $1,000'6 wability uroe Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 - 96-97 _ Total Services _ $107 -$107 Land $0 Construction $1,380 $1,380 Other $0 Total s0 $0 $0 $107 $1,380 $0 _ $1,487 _ Operating Bu t Costs $1,OA0's Ex lure Type 92-93 93-94 _ 94-95 95-96 96-97 TOW _ Personal Services $165 $160 $165 $480 Supplies $2 $2 $2 $6 Maintenance $11 $12 $17 $40 Services $4 $4 $4 $12 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets- J_ $63 $65 $67 $196 Total - $0 -$0 $235 $243 $265 - ~M_73 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0063 - - - ---r~P - Pro ecl: PARK DEVELOPMENT - NORTHEAST _ Project Number: 0063-13 Estimated cost: $500,000 Projw Description: INITIAL DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW PARK SITE - IN NORTHEAST DENTON TO INCLUDE BASIC PARK FACILITIES (I.E. PLAYGROUND, PICNIC, TRAILS, PRACTICE BALLFIELDS). BetrefllslPurpos®;" 'THIS PROJECT WILL ADDRESS A CRITICAL - NEED FOR PARK 3 LEISURE SERVICES IN THE AREA AS ARTICULATED BY CITIZENS IN RECENT BOND IMPLEMENTATION MEETINGS. 'cask SOedu1e (MontWYear) Design Bid Construct Completed Beginning Dater 2-94 -9-94 12-94 (Ending Date: 9-94 12-94 12-96 12-96 Construction Fundln Schedule $1,000's Funding SOU roe Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds $250 $250 Auth/Unissued Bonds $0 1Ald In Const. $260 $260 Other-Unauthorized _ $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $600 50 $0 $500 _ Construollon Fundin Costs 51,000's W- _ OgSi SQS1tG9 Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-9f--- total Services $36 -$35 Land $0 Construction $440 $440 Other-Unauthorized $26 _ $25 Total $0 $0 $0 $600 $0 $0 .$500 Operating 60 get Costs r11,000'e 5x rldlture Type 92-93 93-94 94-96 95-98 96-97 Total Personal Services $40 $40 Supplies $8 $8 Maintenance $10 $10 Services $17 $17 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total - $0 -$0- - - $0 - $75 - -$0 $75 f 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: _ 0002- FM U Pro cu _ NEW ROOF FOR 5 GENERAL FUND CITY BUILDINGS Ma Pro act Number; 000201_- Estimated Cast; _ $399,000 - Projact pescriptlow THE CITY OF DENTON WOULD INSTALL NEW ROOFS THE CIVIC CENTER, OLD SENIOR CENTER, NORTH LAKES, DFNIA, AND VISUAL ARTS CENTER. _ 8enefltslPurpose: PREVENT RO_OF LEAKAGE, PROTECTING BUILDING ASSETS (15 YEAR WARRANTY). Task Sghaduje (Adonth/Yearj Se Innis Date; Design _ Bid Construct Completod 9 10-1--94 3-1-95 5-1-95 _ rwndfn 'pate; 1-1-95 6-f-95 12-1-95 12-1-95 Construction Fundln Schedule ($1,000's) FUndln Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 _ 95-96 - 96-97 Total Existing Bonds - - _ AutIVUnissued Bonds $0 Aid In Const. $0 Other-Unauthorized $157 5242 $0 Tolat $0 $0 - - $399 _ $0 $157 $242 so 5399 ConslructlonFundln "Costs $1,000's _ Utiblll Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-06 - 96-97 Totai r Services Land $o Construction $0 Other $157 $242 $399 Total $0 $0 $0 - Sib? $242 $399 50 0 ratin Bu at Costs $1,000 Ill ndllure Type 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 - 96-97 - Total - Personal Services - Supplies - $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total -so pU - - 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL GOVERNMENT DMS10N/ PIIUJEG'1 AID ANNUAL OPERATING DWARTMI3NT NUMBER PRAJBAT NAMlI BOND IN 1995-% PROPOSED InINp9 CONSTRUCTION AND MIER TGTAI, iMAMMMANCE ' "'WERM 00100 FORT WURTIi DR PAVING & DRAIN MHA9E ~ 694,000 • ENGINEERING 001013 ARTERIAL TURN LANES 049,000 11rIQ1tR[y(J - 401015 SIDBYVAISJRdKgWAXa 127,000 127,000 • ENGINEERING 001016 AVENUE B PAVING 128,000 1210000 , E WOURM 001017 TRAPJr1C WNAkS 144,000 141,000 • ENGINEERING 001021 ARTERIAL TURN LANES 297,0M 234,000 2 W400MBRM 901022 134,000 ,000 CONSTRUCTION 338,000 134,000 • ENGINEERING 001023 WBSTWAY PAVING AND DRAINAGE 331,000 • RMGINERRING' 001028 PART WURTH DR PAVM A DRAIN 326,000 316,000 MWE U) • ENGINEERING 001068 COLL IN SP PAVING A DRAIN PHASE 0 621,000 021,000 n 525,000 525,000 ' PLa1NNpr(} ' . 00001 ' CM PARK WATER FACILITY STUDY • PLANNING ODISQ LANDSCAPE LOOP 218 $0,000 ' $0,000 K A~NNM 99MA LANDSCAP$ FOR WOR'J'111)RBYE-1 274,000 273,000 S47,000 40 . ,000 4x,ooo 44,000 89,000 11,000 . S3,COD •APPR PRIOR YEAR - s/\ .,,v..~m ..nvn*riraf:aa afw?n vowo m ff"*M ww"14 KA04 M EV&15 Now WWI WON" No"" 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fun(d: aot0 - Pro c1: FT. WOR'T'H DRIVE PAVE&DRG (PH I) - M-a-~-- Pro dot Number: 0010-03 Estimated Cast $699,004 - - Pro)ect Desorlption, CONSTRUCT PHASE TI OF A 4 LANE DIVIDED ~v THOROUGHFARE (SDH&PT) FROM IH35 TO COLLINS STREET WITH A WIDE MEDIAN TO PROVIDE FOR FUTURE EXPANSION TO 6 LANES. HenefitsJPurpow PRIMARY REASON FOR RECONSTRUCT IS TO PROVIDE CAPACITY AND TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS BY CONSTRUCTING A MEDIAN AND IMPROVING DRIVEWAY ACCESS _ _ Task Schedule (MonthJYoar) Deslyn Bid Construct Com !sled Be Tnnin D MAY-96 OT-96 JAN-97 - Endin Oate: ' SEP-96 NOV-98 JUN-97 Construction Fundin Schedule ($1,000's) _ - urld n SRUrce Prior 922=93 ` 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 _ Total - [Aid xisting Bonds $392 $307 uth/l}nlssued Bonds $699 In Const, $0 ther $0 50 otal - $ - SO $0 Sa - $392 $307 $699 Gonstructlon Ftrndin Costs $1,000's _ Liability Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total _ Services - - 516 Land $15 Construction $0 Other $377 $307 $664 Total $0 $0 _ $0 _ $0 _ $392 $307 O $699 0 _rall_ ny Bud et costs $1,000-6) _ Ex nature T 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total _ Personal Services - - Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 $0 o - -$0 - - - $0 - 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ARTERIALTURN LANES mber, 0013 Cost: 5127,050 _WIPIlon; THIS PRJECT WLANES rSAT --Q 001 R LEFT FOR CAPACITY AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENT, Ur Aose, INCREASE CAPHILE MPROVING SAFETY AT CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS. Task Sahedute (Month/Year) Deai n Bid Construct Completed Be Inning Data,' jMA R- 9JUIL -95 SEP-95 R-96 AUG-85 NOV-96 Construction Fundin Schedule S1,0OA's~ _ Fundin &ouroe Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 96-96 - Exisfing Bonds - 96-97 Total AuttVUnlssued Bonds $0 Aid In Consl. $0 Other-Unauthorized 50 Total $U _ $127 $0 _ 50 $0 - $127 Construction Fundin Costs $1,000'8 5127 _ So _ $127 UabU Saurae `Prior 82-93 9344 Services 94-96 96-96 96-97 Total Land $$10 $10 2 $2 Construction $116 15 52 Other $11 b Total 50 $0 SD - - _..-_50 610,000 8 SO 5127 - $127 o- ratln BU IC 8 Ex two T _ 92-93 93-94 94-95 85-9 Personal Services 6 96-97 Total Supplies _ 50 Maintenance $0 Services $ 0 Debt Service 50 Insurance $ 0 Fixed Assets $ Total - - 0 $0 $0 sq- - 50 50 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM rAND ooid - SIDEWALKS/BIKE Number 0010•• 15ed Cost: $128,100 Nscripoon SIDEWALKS WILL BE LLECTOR STREETS FOR SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOLS, PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SHOPPING. _ 88ndfltslPyrposa: ; PEDESTRIAN SAFE_TY WILL BE ENHANCED THUS ENCOURAGING MORE ACTIVITY AND REDUCING AUTOMOBILE TRIPS. - - Task Schecula (MonlhlYear) _ Design Bid Construct Completed Beginning Date: FEB-95 JUN-95 AUG-95 _ Endln Date: MAR-95 JUL-95~ OCT-95 T- _ Construction Funding Schedule ($1,000's) _ Fundih 'Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97- Total Existing Bonds - ---$0 Auth/Unissued Bonds $0 Aid In Const. $0 Other-Unauthorized $128 $129 Total io $0 - $ - - $128 $0 $128 notO12-i3-1913- ndin Costs $1,000's Uablli Source 94 94-95 Ser vices -T- $7 7 Land $3 $3 Construction $ t 18 $118 Other $0 Total - $0 $0 $128 $o - $128 0 rating Bud el 00616 $1,000'6 E>t r Pure Type 92-93 93-94 94-95 96-9fi - 96 91 Total Personal Services - _T- - - - - $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total - - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1992-97 CAPfTAf_ IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund; aolo -w. _ - _ Pro eGt; - -----P-A-VIN -_G--- - AVENUE B - - _ Pra eat Number o010-~ s ~M-~ Estimatedcost; cast; $143,650 - _ Pro~eat Aetariptlon, AVENUE B WILL BE RECONSTRUCTED FROM_EAGLE_ TO UNDERWOOD INCLUDING SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE AND CURB AND GUTTER. anelttslPurposa: EXISTING STREET IS 1N NEED OF REPAIR BEYOND WHAT NORMAN MAINTENANCE OR REPAVING OPERATIONS CAN ACCOMPLISH. Task Schedule {MonthlYear} - - _ Desi n Bld Construct Com leled Be Inntn Dater FE8-95 MAY-95 JUL-95 - Endlrt Date: APA-95 JUN-95 OCT-85 Fundl Source construction Fundln ScheduI 51,0o0s Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 - Existing Bonds - 95-96 96-97 Total Auth/Unissued Bonds $ Aid in Consi. $0 Other-Unauthorized $0 Total $0 $0 $O _x144 _ $144 Consiruatlon Fundln (Jolts 51,400's $0 $144 $ 0 _ 51.44 IU sgltl Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 Services 95-96 96-97 _ Tofa! _ Land $ 1 $10 - 0 Construction 50 Other $134 $134 Total 50 SO SO 50 SO So _x144 0 ralin Bu tCosts Sf,oA4`s 5?4a EN diture T 92-93 93-94 94-86 95-96 Personal Services 96-97 Total - Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets _ $0 Total - - - - i "Ph 0+ lhli D-w. WOW P 404q wkdN 4 itllwm U ",m au~u toy 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM V 1ot: Gf rOOfO-17 ated Cost: $ 97 _ 597,150 at Descripil; THIS FUNDILL ONSTRUCTION FUND WO LARGE INTERSECTIONS OR THREE SMALL INTERSECTIONS DEPENDING ON COMMUNITY NEEDS AT THE TIME. Berl efltaft( se; --T_ SAFETY AT INTERSECTIONS MEETING WARRANTS ACCORDING TO THE FIC TEXAS MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. Tasic Schedule (Month/Year) _ Des! n Bid _ Construct Completed Be Innin Date, FEB-95 MAY-95 JUL45 Ending Date APR-95 JUN-95 SEP-96 SEP-95 - _ Construction Fundln Schedule $1, 000's) Fundin Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 - 96-97 Total Existing Bonds AutiVUnissued Bonds $0 Aid In Const. $0 Other-Unauthorized $0 Total $0 `50 - SO - _ 297 $297 $0 5297 Constructlon Fundln Costs $1,000's _-5297 ulablll SaUrce Prior - 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 _ 98-97 total Services - Land $36 - $35 Construction $2 $2660 0 $2 Other $0 Total So So - - - $ o $297 - $0 $297 0 ralln Bud et Costs $1,000- E>< andilure T o 92-93- 93-94 94-95 95-96 96 97 - Total Personal Services - - - Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $o Debt Service $1 $1 $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total - - $o $o s2, -WWI I 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund. 0010 _ _ Pro)eat. ARTERIAL TURN DANES Project Numbef; 0010-21 Estimated Cast; $13_4,400 projact Cesfxlption; THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE THREE TURN LANES (RIGHT OR LEFT) FOR CAPACITY AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENT. • SerfelltslPufpolq. INCREASE CAPACITY WFIILE IMPROVING SAFETY FEATURES AT CRITICAL INTERSECTIONS. Tu@k Schedut~ {Mor,ttdYw Design Bid Construct Completed Ba Innln Date; FE6-98 MAY-96 JUL-96 19ading Cate; APR-96 JUN-A6 NOV-96 _ Construction Funding 'Sohaclula $1,0001s Fundirt &oures _ Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 98-87 Total Existing Bonds - - SU AutWUnissued Bonds $0 Aid in Const• $0 Other-Unauthorized 5134 $194 [Total $0 $0 $Q SO $134 - $0 $134 Construction F'undln Coats $1,000's Liablli ai Prior 92-93 93-94 94-96 95-96 96-97 Total Services $20 --$20 r Land $2 $2 Construction $112 $112 Other Total $0 _$0 s0 _ SO $134 $0 $134 Q faun Budget Costs $1,0001 s E>< tole Y 92-93 93-94 94-96 95-96 96-97 Total Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 so _ ,.r.,:,.-. n..<<.; r ....':'riff. h;Vit)g4 6ii:i1N..I 1•'1.4[Yk'iRk4!+`. IYty~4 IRM1P^.r IMMtY! 1992-97 CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0010 - - Pro Got: STREET CONSTRUCTION 1a~ Pro t Number 6010-22 _ - Estimated Coet; _ $338,100 Pro*! 00$Cflptlon: THIS FUNDING WILL ALLOW THE CITY STREET DEPARTMENT TO UNDERTAKE MAJOR REPAIR FOR SHORT SECTIONS OF STREETS UTILIZING RECYCLING AND OTHER METHODS. efils/AurpASe: 'COST EFFECTIVE USE OF CITY MANPOWER AND CAPABLE OF DOING SMALL STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. Task Schedule (MonthlYear) Desl n _ Bid Construct Cam fated Sa Innin Data. APR-96 MAY-96 JUN-96 ndln pate: MAY-96 JUN-96 SEP-96 - Construction i undin Schedule $1,00018 _ _ Fundin Souroe Prior 92- y Existing Bonds 93 93-94 94-95 95-96---------- 96-97---- Total - AuttVUnissued Bonds $0 Aid In Const. $0 Other-Unauthorl~d $0 _ $338 $338 Total $0 - $0 $0 _ $0 $338 $o $3381 _ Oo(1struotion Fundln costs $1,00010 UWII Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 9b-96 - 98-97 - Total Services $26 $25 Lend Conslructlo1 a0 $313 $313 Other Total $0 $o -$o - - so $n _-$0 $3391- $0 $338 0 ratln Bud et Costs $1,000's) ipa- rkA 92-93 93-9494-95 nal Services es $0 $0 enance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Foxed Assets - - $0 Total - y- -$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: _ 0010 - - - _ Pro ctf WESTWAY PAVING AND DRAINAGE Fro AQI Number: 0010-23 ~stlmated Cast: _ $316, 50 PCOJad pat~cripllan; THIS PROVIDES PAVING ANA DRAINAGE - IMPROVEMENTS FOR 8"O WIESTWAY STREET BETWEEN FULTON AND CARROLL fitslPWIP0 'THE EXISTING STREET HAS DETERIORATED TO THE POINT THAT RECONSTRUCTION INCLUDING PROPER DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE NEEDED TO INSURE PAVEMENT DURABILITY. Task Schedule (Mon ear) - Bid t3t3 I~Oi~ta ~l D8-~i- MAY 98- Construct Com toted FEB-96 _ -96 _ Erldir!U Data; ApR-96 JUN IC L -96 EC-98 DEC-96 - Gonstructian Fundln Schedule $1,000's) Fund Jng Source Prior 92-95 93-94 94-95 95-96 Existing Bonds 9&-97 Total - Auth/Unissued Bonds - $0 Aid In Cosst, $0 Other-Unauthorized $0 TOtal~ SO $0 $ O $163 $163 $316 _ $0 5183 153 $316 Gonstructlon Fundin Costa S1,aA0's _ wabillit 1$04 a Prior 92-93 93-94 94-9y8 95-e6 - Servic ee 96-97 Totah Land $24 - $24 Construction $5 $5 Other_ $134 $153 $287 Total $a - $163 $316 0 ratan tau et Costs $1,000's - - 8x nditure T 92-93 93-94 94-95 Personal Services 95-9ti - - 9fi-97 ~ Total Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Se6ices $0 Debi Sorvice $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total - a, tiauws bn1+►411 uopmw xrIfH7P1.a,~~ reYihi„ .aYF~a rhitf;`'i; l.ps4„j i ubkd o-1 -H~9 k rlU1 noh BeVNfa?.iJ .~lu!i.•4. 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - Fund; 0010 Pro{act. FT WORTH DRIVE (1-35 TO COLL-INS) PH II Pro act Number 0010-29 - _ EsllmatedCost, $621,000 pfo*t DP",cr{pgorr CONSTRUCT PHASE ! OF A 4-LANE DIVIDED THOROUGHFARE (TxDOT) FROM IH 35 TO COLLINS STREET WITH A WIDE MEDIAN TO PROVIDE FOR FUTURE EXPANSION TO 6 LANES. _ BanafitslPUfpAaa, PRIMARY REASON FOR RECONSTRUCT IS TO PROVIDE CAPACITY AND TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS BY CONSTRUCTING A MEDIAN AND IMPROVING DRIVEWAY ACCESS. Task Schedule (MonthlYear) Desi n Bid Construct Completed Be Innln Dated MAY-95 SEP-96 NOV-95 Sndln Date. AUG-95 OCT-96 1 UL=96 JUL-96 _ construction Fundln Schedule $1,000's) Fundin Source Prior 92-93 83-94 94-95 - 95-96 $321 96 a7 $300 Total $621 Existing Bonds $0 AuthlUnissued Bonds $0 Aid in Const. $0 Other-Unauthorized _ Tota1 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $321 $300 $621 Gonslrucllon Fundin Costs $1,400's Uablli taaurce Prior 82-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 §50.96-97 _ Total $50 Services $15 $15 Land $256 $300 $656 Constrociian $0 Other - Total $o $0 $0 $0 $321 - -$300 _ `_$fi21 _-Operating Bu et costs $i,000's - 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 9&-97 Total Ex nditure ype T $0 Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets I 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund; Project; COLLINS STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE PH 1 _ ° - - - Pro ct Number; 0010-68 - Me Estimated Cost, $525 ,000 - Proleot,pats4iptlam PROVIDE 4t FOOT STREET FROM FT, WORTH RIVE TO DALLAS DRIVE INCLUDING DRAINAGE, SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE,riLRD CROSSING, AND RELOCATION OF INTERSECTION AT DALLAS DRIVL; 0 ane11t8lAUrpose, PROVIDE ALTERNAT EVI ROUTE TO EAGLE18EL-I DALLAS DRIVE INTERSECTION AND RELOCATES TRAFFIC FROM DANGEROUS INTERSECTION AT DALLAS DRIVE, Task schedule (MontlvYesr) Desl n Bid Construct Com eted B irnnin Date JAN-96 MAY-96 JUL-86 ErOn 'Date- APR-96 JUN-% MAR-97 Fun di tiouroe Conairuction undinSoheduie -$1' -13 Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 Existing Bonds 95-96 9-6--9-7-- Total AuttVUnissued Bonds $0 Ald In Const. Other-Unauthorized $0 Total $150 $a $0 $Q $0 SO x375 _ $S25 Construction Funding Costs $1,000'S $16° 5376 $526 uabu Ice 'Prior 92-93 93-9q Servlcea 94-95 9b-96 96-97 To1ai_ Land $35 T' - ~$36 rr Construction $115 $115 Other $0 Total $3'75 $ $0 $0 $a $0 $150 - - $375-.---_$0 EX nd11Wa Y 0 ratln am t costa 51,000's $526 Personal SerolCes - 92-93 93-94~ 94-95 95-96 96-97 Tolai Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance Fixed Assets $0 Total $O _ $0- $0 $0 -$0 - --$0 . . ..i-.-,., i ,c...ia:.u rnH\!W M4V.key". t'AIAS+ CRi4~f.•. pxtcts,. .arnn-.n ..w....... 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund; _ 0015 - LM GC CITY PARK WATER FACILITY STUDY W aP_ Project Number. _ 001601 Estirnated Cost; $50,000 - Pro)w Oewlplion; DESIGN OF A SCENIC PART BASED ON A HISTORIC DESIGN, IN THE PECAN CREEK WAT`RSHED. Eienet6im rp-ow BEAUTIFICATION AND UTILIZATION OF ONE OF _ DENTON MOST VISIBLE SITES. POTENTIAL FOR WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT. Task Schedule (MontWYear) Design Bid _ Construct Completed nnin Date; 1-95 Ending Date; 11-95 _ Construction Fundln~Schadule $1,000'6 ,Funding Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94.95 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds - !$0 Unauth/Unissu Bonds $50 $50 Aid In Const, $0 Other $0 Total $0 $0 s0 $0 650 $0 $50 Construction Funding Costs $1,0006 Cost Source Prior 92-93 93-94 _ 94-95 95-96_ 96-97 T01a1 Services -$50 u -$50 Land $0 Construction $0 Other - $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $50 $0 $60 Operating Bud at Costs $1,000'6 Expenditure Type 92-93 93-94 94-85 95-96 96-97 Total _ Personal Services - - $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Flxed Assets $0 Total_ - - $5 - - $0 - T$0 $0 - - $ - - :~s 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Furtd; Ar-- 15 tt ~OOA 288 LANDSCAPING Arp Numbeft 001502--'- POW: ~atlmated Plaj} LANDSCAPING Of LOOP 288 RIGHT-OF-WAY, FIR COLORADO BLVD, TO MC KINNEY STREET, D?"tIIow BEAUTIFICATION OF A MAJOR EN RT ANCEWAY, Tij k S7dFa Ul-&(40-n lW;Y- r) - Be Innfn pate; Desf n Bid Construct Com feted 01195 04196 07/96 Fr1GMn fa+lle; 02/96 08/95 12/96 Fund!. 'txlurca Constructon Fundln Sr:hedule $1,ooo's _ Exlstfng Bonds Prior 92-931 8394 _ 94-96 95-96 96-97 AuthlUnfssued Bonds - Total Unauth/Unissu Bonds $274 J$273 Aid In Const,-Grant Other $273 Total SO - $0 S0 $p LIablNty Sourt~--w _ Construction F ndln Cost $i,000,s $547 $0 $547_ Prior _ 92-93 ► Services 93-54 94-95 95-96 - Land 96-97 Total Construction $38 $38 Other $290 $0 Total - $290 q - $0 $219 --~-$219 $p O ratin laud et Costs $1,000'a $o $547 $0 ExPendlture Type 82-93 _ - $547 - Personal Services 93-94 84-95 95-96 - SuppNeg 96-97 Total Maintenance $0 Services $40 $0 Debt Service $40 Fixed Assets $0 Total _ $0 $0 - $0 - _ `sg13t-..} taMV-iN Ik'PiYe,'3'? 4vivA'ba ~ti~W.li %eiMtj PWAf1i '~i.(v FJiY3tuy prq ¢ wow. kaxxpa 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Pro o -----0015 Pro Oct Number- FORT WORTH DRIVE LANDSCAPING - t 001__- 5Ag_` Estimat6~Oost; - LMT 112 AroJect pescrlptlon: LA_ NDSCAPING OF FORT WORTH DRIVE, - - FROM COLLINS STREET TO 1-35, BenefilslPUf,o BEAUTIFICATION OF q'jNp~pR ENTApNCEWAY---- Task Sphadule (Mon;hlYearj 13P In pate. Dew B!d - 01194 Q94 Construct Cott feted Endln pate; 02=94 05194_ 04/94 _ 11/94 Funds Son jj,rce - Construction Funding po12/94- - Pn Existing Bonds or 92-93 Jule 0000. } 93-gq - 84-95 Ault/Unissued Bands - 95-96 _ 96-97 Total Ll0aulh/Un1ssu Bonds - - Aid In COnst.- Grant $0 Qlhe---r - _ - _ $45 $0 Total - - $44 $45 $0 ~~$0 S0 - $44 Llabllfty Spurt Construction F ndin Cost $0 $69 ` $p - - $0 Prior 92-93 g $1000's Services 53-9- 94-95- $69 Land 95-96- Construction $6 Total Other - w $o $6 Total - $47 $0 $0 - $47 $0 O $0 $36 - Expenditure Type 0 ratinBud et Cos $ is $1 pOp` --$89 $0 $36 Personal Services 92-93 93-94 - ii -9-5 supplies -95 - 95-96 - 96-97-- Total Maintenance Services $o Debt Service $5 $6 $0 Fixed Assets $11 Total - $0 $0 _ _0_ it t , yv e}ar?.v r Sara a atwa b 4 rta,tl K, xwe MAW uawr+n mgaai caau-. > 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund; Mai-- Pro clc FORT WORTH DRIVE LANDSCAPING • I Pro ct Number 001508 EstimatedCosr $89,112 Prot Description, LANDSCAPING OF FORT WORTH DRIVE, FROM COLLINS STREET TO 1-35. ~enafllslPurE~ose; BEAUTIFICATION OF A MAJOR ENTRANCEWAY. Task Schedule (MonihlYear) Design Bid Construct Coon Ip eted Endinnipa gate, ^ 0of/94 103194 2!94 J 04!94 ~ _J66194 j _ _ 12!94 Construction Funding Sahedule~$1,000's Funding Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-- 0 Existing Bonds ~ - - - $0 Auth/Unissued Bonds $0 UnauthlUnissu Bonds $45 $45 Aid In Const,- Grant _ $44 _ $44 Other Total $0 - $0 $0 - - $0 _ $89 ----$0 $89 Construction Finding Cost ($1,000's Liability Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Services $6 $6 Land $0 $0 Construction $47 $47 Other _ $36 $36 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $89 - $0 - $89 Operating Budget Costs 51,000's~ _ - Expenditure Type 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total $0 Personal Services $0 Supplies Maintenance $5 $6 $11 Services $0 Debt Service $0 $0 Fixed Assets - - Total - - $0 - $0 $0 $5 - ---$6 _ -11 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL GOVERNMENT ANNUAL =DEPASKMENWT OJ$4'f AID OPERATING FtBBR PR(3lE~ T NAME BOND IN AND KJNDS' ~ 1996-9T PROPOSED N RU4'I iC)N OTHER TAT AI. MAINTENANCE • SWINflli M 001050 MISG STREET CONSTRUCTIANAUCONSUUCTION 334,000 + ENGINEERING 001051 INTERSECTION CONTROL SIGNAL 314 337, • FN(i1NLdUM 00101$2 31DAWALK QQNSTRUCPIAN ,000 317,000 loom • ENGINEERING 001053 TURN LANES FOR ARTERIALS 137,E 137,E 1,000 137,000 137,000 • BTIGWERIi4f} 001010 Mp!T<i(J READ SHOULDER, 146,000 176,000 • DRAINAGE 011002 COOPER CREEK CHANNEL (PHASE 1) 500 000 * PRAINAOE 011004 Avamm a 500,000 2,000 .OOD PLANNING 001510 LANDSCAPE PORT WORTH DR (PHASE U) 181,0 00 8/ 000 139,000 PARX4= 006314 POOL. WMANSIAN , 168,000 61,000 FIRE 005101 REPLACE SNORKEL 1,304,000 1,700,000 ~~QqO 575,000 575,000 +APPR PRIOR YEAR 1992-97 CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund; 0010 M Project; MISC STREET CONS_TRUCTiON_IRECONSTRUCTION Pr* 61 Numl)er; 0010-50 Estimated Cosh _$338,100 _ _ Pro)eat 0a%riptIon: THIS FUNDING WILL ALLOW THE CITY STREET DEPARTMENT TO UNDERTAKE MAJOR REPAIR FOR SHORT SECTIONS OF STREETS UTILIZING RECYCLING AND OTHER METHODS. _ Nnet{ts/Purposa; . COST EFFECTIVE USE OF THE CITY MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT CAPABLE OF DOING SMALL STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS, Task Schedule (MonthlYear) Desl n Bid Construct Completed - Be Innin Date,: JAN-97 MAR-97 MAY-97 Endip Date. " FEB-97 APR-97 SEP-97 ~ Construction Fundln Schedule 51,000's Fundl-_ng _Source Prior 92-93 93-94 - 94-95 _ 95-96--- 96-97_---_ Total _ Existing Bonds $0 Auth/Unisaued Bonds $0 Aid in Const. $0 Other-Unauthorized _$338_ $338 Total $0 $ $0 s0 _ $0 _8338 $338 Construction Fundin Costs $1,000's LiebUf taoUfCe; Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 _ 95-96 96-97 Total services $25 $25 Land $0 Construction $313 $313 Other $0 Total $0 - $0 $0 - --$0 - $0 - $338 - $338 operating Bud et Costs ($1,000's Ex Iufe Type 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96 97 Total Personal Services Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 - -$0 - ~0- Total ---$0 50 _ 50 - $0 ,mow, 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund. 0010 - Pro c1' INTERSECTION CONTROL SIGNALS Pro act Number; 0010-51 Vskimated Coat $317,000 Protect Daacrlptlon; IN ORDER TO ADDRESS INCREASED TRAFFIC VOLUMES BY PROVIDING CAPACITY AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS, TWO MAJOR INTERSECTIONS SHOULD BE SIGNALIZED P#neNt$/ trtpo$aW INCREASE MOTORIST SAFETY AT VARIOUS INTERSECTIONS THAT MEET TRAFFIC VOLUME WARRANTS SET FORTH BY THE TEXAS MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DGVICES. Task Sahadula (MonWYear) _ Design Bid Construct Completed Be innini Date' - OCT-96 -JJAN-97 MAY-97 finding Date.' DEC-N ]FEU-97 OCT~97_ OCT-97 _ Construction Fundln Schedule ($1,000's Fundln Sw. Prior - 92-93 93-94 94-9,5i -95-96 - 96-97 Total $O Existing Bonds $0 Autl0nissued Bonds $0 Aid In Const, $317 _ $317 Other-Unauthorized Total $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 _ $317 $317 ConatruolionFundin Goste S1,oQA'a LIab111 Woo Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total ` ! Services $18 $18 Land $2 $2 $297 $297 Construction $0 ` Other - Total $0 $0 $0 -----$0 -$0- $317 $317 $i,0o0's Operating Uu 16-6616 Ex ~92-93 93-94 94-95 - 96-96 _ 96-97 - Total ~_$D Personal Services Supplies $1 $ t $1 $1 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Servico $0 Insurance _ $0 Fixed Assets Total $0 $0 $0 $0 _ eri1A+0.f 1:,9i+5ui !i?4R eVYP3lQ kaVfia%' t+.iA?4lf d!o'Yd!'.N 4WYBW iM'AM'M i9AltlPiJ 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0010 Pro ect: SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION - Project Number: 0010-52 Estimated Cost: $134,400 P(ojwt 00606Ptlon: SIDEWALKS WILL BE PROVIDED ALONG ARTERIALS AND COLLECTOR STREETS FOR SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOLS, PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SHOPPING AREAS. Benefits7Purpo", PEDESTRIAN SAFETY WILL BE ENHANCED THUS ENCOURAGING MORE ACTIVITY AND REDUCING AUTOMOBILE TRIPS. Task Schedule (Month)Year) Design Bid Construct Corn lelod 13e innin Oato.~^ OCT-96 FES-97 97T- APR-97 Ending Date JAN-97 MAR- JUL-97 Constructionundin Schedule $1,000's Funding Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bands --_-_$O Auth/Unlssued Bonds $0 Aid In Const, $0 Other-Unauthorized $134 _ $134 Total $0 - $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $134 $134 _ Consiructlon,, ndin Costs $1,00016 Uawl Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 _ Total _ Services ------$10 $10 Land $2 $2 Construction $122 $122 Other $0 Total $0 $0 $0 ~$0 $0 -y $134 $134 _ Operating Bud et Costs S1,000's _ Expenditure Type 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total _ Personal Services - $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $1 $1 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 so $0 SO $1 $1 Fun 1892--97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM d: 0010 pro Pra ct Numger ct - - , TURN LANES FCR ARTERIALS - - - Estimated Cast: Pro aeiP~ SIP v CONSTRUCT TURN LANES (LEFT Ot{ RIGHT AT fNTERSECTIONS FOR CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT } 8 enef116/PUr WI CAPACITY AND TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENT REDUCES FUEL COSTS FOR THE MOTORING PUBLIC, Task Schedule (Month/Yetar}----_-- l3e inn! pat Design _ Bid Constr OCT-96 uct Com leted Endi Odtet JAN-97 MAR-97-- Fun DEC_86 FEB-97 SEP-9Swlroe Prlor Ganstrucflon Fundin Sdul$j-w 's} Existing Bonds 92-93 93-94 941g"- AuthlUnlssuedBonds 95-96 96-97 -f-"t l Aid in Const, Other-Unauthorized $0 Total $137 $0 $0 $137 Ltabii t'SSource ConstfuctianFundln Costs $1,000't7 $0 -~x137 $137 Services Prior 92-93 93-94 Land 94-95 95-96 96-97 total ConstfUctlon $13 $13 Other $3 13 Total - $121 $0 _ $o - $121 O do E% ratin 8u a1 Costsa$1, p00's1 - -$0 _ $137 $9 Personaal l So T $137 ervk;es 92-93 93-9q 94-95 - Supplies 95-96 ~6-97 T Total- _ Maintenance Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 $0 46 $0- $0 - _ -i0- II ` ' Y FaWYV7 r/VHMF.Y !'Y41✓R Iou>y iNA1iV:r rrwa5nr wse.Yf.,i xf'9iM1Pr; UAWAT2I f111T/h'2 [1Nd4Y.! l1lMSf!1 NliAlrnYgrM~r. 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund. - - - 0010 _ _ - Pro cG SHOULDE_Fi ON MINGO ROAD - Map-- Pro t Number 0010-80 Eatlmated Cast; $175,soo - Pro I Dewlptlon; BUILD 2' WIDE ASPHALT SHOULDER ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF MINGO ROAD FROM RUDDELL STREET TO MOCKINGBIRD. _ SenOfi161PUrpose: PROVIDE A SAFE PLACE FOR MOTCRIS7S TO PULL OVER IN AN EMERGENCY AND ELIMINATE HAZARDOUS LOW SHOULDER, Task Schedule (Monlt0ear) Design _ Bid Construct Completed 6e Innin Date, " OCT-96 FEB-97 APR-97 _ Endln Date, DEC-96 MAR-97 - SEP-97 SEP-97 _ Conslruollon Fundin Schedule $1r000's) W-47- Fundin Source Prior 92-93 4 93-94 94-95 95-98 - _ Total Existing Bonds $0 Auth/Unlssued Bonds Aid In Const. $0 Other $0 $176 $176 Total - S0 $0 $0 ~~s~ 6176 ~.$176 n Construction Fundin Costs $1,000's "abAl fwurc Prior r2-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 jj 96 -97 Total Services $30 $30 Land $0 Construction $146 Other $1$0 $0 Total $SO - - $0 $17s $176 _ Q ratln Bu t Costs $11001s) - E4 , rlditUre T a - 92-93 93-94 94-96 95-96 96-97 Total Personal Services $o Supplies Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 $0 SO _ Total L-- - ---$p --$0- ---o 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM dpi; COOPER CREEK CfiANN` -EL pHg3 1 - Ma t Humbert 0810-02 [jF3OVIW,ACK nd. C. LP. imated Cosh $500,000' _ - @$~IR1brt; DEVELOP A PLAN FOR COOPER CREEK & CONSTRUC ANNEL IMPROVEMENTS AS NECESSITATED BY DEVELOPMENT,SfLTATION OF CAPACITY. STARTS MINGO THEN UPSTREAM AS FUNDS ALLOW. AIPurpoOO. REDUCE FLOODING N SOLATED A- RE'AS A1JD RECT OVERTOPPING OF CULVERTS FROM MINGO ROAD TO END OF SE L REDUCE MAIIJTENANCE COSTS. Task Sf hedula p6n-1 dYeer) _ Desi n Bid__ Construct Com leted Be In pataOCT.g6 ms-97 APR-97 EndingnlnDate. JAN-97 MAR 97 _ DEC-97 Construction Fondin Schedule ($1,000's) _ Fun Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-96~ 95-96 96-97 - Existing Fonds h--$$600 AuthlUnissued Bonds Aid In Contt. Other-Unauthorized Total $0 $0 S0 $0 $0 (Construction Fundin Costs -,040's) _ LIabII &QUrc~@ Prior 92-93 93-94 - - SendCes 94-95 95-96~ 96-97 Total Land $30 $30 Construction $0 Other $0 Tote! $0 $0 - $0 -$470 $470 $0 $0 $500 $500 0 ratan Su of Costs $1,000's X~?T 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 _ _ 86-97 Total Puraonal Services Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $2 $2 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total so $0 $0 - - - - - - - $0 $2 2- FORM # wsa"! au wa i N~^1 eB4QN1 4M1M9~W .:..are... .-..ti+...i antN 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT HF)OGRAM _..T- Lip..-__ Fund; O.LP' - - - Pro cl; AVENUE G DRAINAGE OUTPACE pro t Number 0810-Oa Estimated Cost; $139,000 FOR EX S NIGIDRAINAGE COLLECTED FROM AREAS AROUND OAKI, H CKOR ENUE E, - - I3aneHtslYUipOS9; EXPAND OUTFALL CAPACITY TO ALLOW THE STORM SEWERS CONSTRUCTED WITH AVE E AND OAK-HICKORY TO FUNCTION AS DESIGNED WITH THE PROPER OUTFALI_ SYSTEMT ?ask Sahaduie (MonthlYear) DesI n Bid Construct Completed ~l0 n(in pale;` 0 CT-96 FEB-97 APR-97 I_ _ 4EnQlD pale; JAN-97 MAR-97 SEP.97 _I _ Construction Fundln Schedule $1.000's)- Funding Source Prior 92-93 93-94 _ 94`95 96 47 -al ]$139 Existing Bonds Tot Auth/Unlssued Bonds Aid in Const. $139 _ Other-Unauthorized $0 39 Total $0 $0 $0 _ _ Construction Funding Costs $1.000s ~leplli 6ourt18` Prior 92-93 93-94 94-96 95-96 96-97 $15 Total = $16 Services $0 and $124 $124 Construction - _$0 Other 50 $0 _ $0 50 $139 $139 Total $0 0 ratio Bu elCosls $1,000'0) Tola4 Ex ndlturo yPe `-J! 92-93 93-94 94-96 95-~96~ - 96-97 $0 Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 _ $o $0 Fixed Assets - - - - $0 S0 $ Total - - 199397 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 0016 - Mti Fund, - - - prp i, FORT WORTH DRIVE LANDSCAPING - li _ pro t Number. 001610 Emimated cost $167,874 prpjgat oesmiption; LANDSCAPING OF FORT WORTH DRIVE, FROM 136, SOUTH TO MISSION STREET. Benefltr~pulpose; BEAUTIFICATION OF A MAJOR ENTRANCEWAY. Task Schedule (Month/Yeao jDesl n_ Bid Construct Com lolod IOe nn1194 04194 _ 06194 3!94 05!94 77 11!1'000Prior 95-96 96-97 Total Fundln So woe Existing Bonds $0 $B4 $$0 AuthlUnissued Bonds $0 UnautWUnissu Bonds $84 _ $$0 Aid In Const.- Grant _ - _ $0 TotOthrtl ef - -$0 $168 .~--$168 SO `$0 $Q - $0 _ _ Construction F ndin Cost ($1,000's -Total Liability Source Pr1or 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96- 96-97 $12 $12 Services $0 Land $89 _ $89 Construction - --$67 _ $67 Other $168 Total $O $0 $p - $0 $168 O~eratin Bu et Costs $1,000's)__ Expenditure Type 92-93 93-94 94-95 96-96 96-97 Total $0 personal Services $0 Supplies $64 $64 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Fixed Assets _ - - E`\ Total_ - $tl b0.. $0 _ - --$64 - --$64 gars ~ 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund. 0063 Pro ct; POOL EXPANSION _ Pro ct Number; 0063-14 Estimated Cost, $1,300,000_ _ _ Prow Description; THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE FOR AN EXPANSION OF ACQUATIC FACILITIES IN THE CITY, BenefilslPurpose; ENHANCE AQUATIC RECREATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS AND INSTRUCTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR DENTON RESIDENTS, Task Schedule (MontWYeao Design - Bid Construct Completed___ Be lnnin Date, 10-96 2-97 6-91 End n Dates 2-97 4-97 5-96 _ 5-98 _ Construction Fundin Schedule $1,000's) - Fundin Source - Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds $0 AuthlUnissued Bonds $0 Aid in ConsL $0 Other--Unauthorized A$1,300 _ $1,300 Total $0 $0 $4 $0 $0 $1,300 $1,300 ConstructlonFundln Costs $1,000'6 Cost Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 _ 96-97 Total Services - $104 $104 Land $0 Construction $1,196 $1,196 Other $0 T _ $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $1,300 $1,300 Operating Budget Costs $ '000's~_~ Ex dlture Type 92-93 i 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 _ _ Total_ Personal Services _ $40 $40 Supplies $8 $8 Maintenance $5 $5 Services $12 $12 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total - - ~0 $0 - $0- $0 - $65. - -------$65 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project: Re lace Snorkel PrpJect Number: 005101 Estimated Cosl: $575,000 Prgw..ADowription, REPLACE SNORKEL I~anellts/Purpasei REPLACE-1974 AMERICAN LA FRANCE 7b F'T- SNORKEL. Task Schedule (Montt0oar) Design Bid Constfucl Complleted- Be innin Dole:T 1193 _ 4193 6193 Ending Date: 12193^ Construction Funding Schedule $1,0001s V Fund~Souro6 ^~Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total / Existing Bonds - - - $0 Auth/Unlssued Bonds $0 Aid In Const, $0 Other $575 $575 Total $0 $0 $0 - $0 _ u $0 $575 $675 _ Construction Fundin Costs $1,000's _ biabUlt Source Prior 92-93 - 93-94 94-95 95-96 T96-- Total Services $0 Land $0 Equipment $575 $575 Other $0 Total $0 $0 $0 -$0-- $0 -$575 $576 T Operating Bud et Costs $1,000's Ex, ndlture Type 92-93 93-94 94-95 _ 95-96_ 96-97 Total Personal Services _-$0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Uebt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets Total $0 .'ter liRFi MoMA4".1 IStMp3 Cfi! 4+. KA1WJiS l9ati'.~L`, IOWA Kkxm malloH ra~aa •RANS:i 14,4.j{iA4 ,Ill~lni 3tt,liJ 1993-97 CAPITAI. IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL GOVERNMENT All) OPFRA'l'IN(; BOND IN AND DIVISION PROJECT FUNDS CONSTRUCTION OTHBR TO'1AI. MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT NUMBER PROJECT NAME OTHER PROJECT'S SUBMITTED 4b'L 000 1,46'1,000 ENGINEERING 0010-55 BERNARD STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE 2,777,000 2,777,000 ENGINEERING 0010-56 WILLOWWOOD PAVING AND DRAINAGE 779' 771 ENGINEERING 0010-57 MYRTLE STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE 649,() ENGINEERING 0010-58 COLLINS STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE PH 11 690,000 612,000 ENGINBERING 00.10-59 MAPLE STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE 612,000 000 4,000 ENGINEERING 0010-60 KINGS ROW PAVING AND DRAINAGE 2,135,000 2,173535, ENGINEERING 0010-61 EAST WINDSOR DR. PAVING AND DRAINAGE 704,000 7,129,,000 000 2,000 ENGINEERING 0010-62 WEST WINDSOR DR. PAVING AND DRAINAGE 3,129,000 2,167,000 ENGINEERING 0010-63 SOUTH BONNIE BRAE PAVING AND DRAINAGE 2,167,000 647~ 4,147,000 3'47' 3,506,000 ENGINEERING 0010-64 MAYHILL ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE PH I 6 ENOINEERINQ 0010-65 MIAYHIM ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE PH 11 2,545,000 ENOINEERING 0010-66 MAYHILL ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE PH 111 2,545,000 3,062,000 ENGINBBRiNCI 0010-67 MASGH BRANCH ROAD PHASE 4 3,062,000 235 ~ 235,000 ENGINEERING 0010-72 RINEY ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE 772' 772,000 ENGINEERING 0010.-13 MASCH BRANCH ROAD PHASE 1 000 2,711,000 ENGINEERING 0010-74 MASCH BRANCH ROAD PHASE H 2,011,000 2,430,000 ENGINEERING 0010-7$ MASGH BRANCH ROAD PHASE IU 1,,430,0,3000 ~ 109,000 ENGINEERING 0010-76 SOUTHEAST DENTON SIDEWALKS l 1109 000 1,109,000 ENGINEERING 0010-17 STATE SCHOOL ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE ,001' mI ~ ENGINEERING 0010-78 HICKORY CREEK ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE 24'~ 24,000 ENGINEERING OOIG-79 HIGHLAND STREET SIDEWALK 14,000 114,000 ENGINEERING 0010-81 AVENUE A PAVING 114,000 1,014,000 ENGINEERING 00II&V SCRIPTURE STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE 1,101487,0,00 000 (00,000 ENGINEERING 0010-83 RINEY ROAD PAVING ~ 60,000 ENGINEERING 0010-64 MOCKINGBIRD LANE DRAINAGE 16 oo0'000 60,000 ENGINEERING 0010-85 MISC. STREET RECONST'RUCTTON 100,000 ENGINEERING 0010-86 MISC. SIDEWALK REPAIR 1100 00 ,0 ~ 00 182,000 ENOINEFiRINO 0010-87 M1SC TRAFFIC CON'T'ROL SIGNALS 481' 400 ~ ENGINEERING 0010-88 WEST WINDSOR DRIVE PAVING 2q0 ~ 240,000 FNGINHERiNG 0010-89 PAYNE DR1V14 PAVING AND DRAINAGE, I 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL, GOVERNMENT ANNUAL 111V1SJPN PROJECT All) OPERNfING DHPAR9'MFNT MIMBFR BOND IN AND PROJECT NAME FUNDS CONSTRUCTION OTHER TOTAL MAINTENANCE OTHER PROJECTS SUFMI'ITBD FNGINESRING 0010»90 MOCKINGBIRD 1,ANE CONNECTION 159,000 DRAINAGE 0810-12 SEQUOIA PARK DRAINAGE 1 141,000 DRAINAGE 0810-13 THUNDBRBIRDDRAINAG1,041,000 1'041'000 DRAINAGE 0810-14 DANIE[S/FT. WORTH DRIVE DRAINAGE 84,000 DRAINAGE 0814.16 CORBIN ROAD URIDGE 330,E 330,000 1'37,0 [,537,000 DRAINAGE 0810-17 ET. WORTH DRIVE DRAINAGE 537 DRAINAGE 0810»18 RANCI{ ESTATES DRAINAGB 5,000 537,000 DRAINAGE 0610-19 COIT STREET DRAINAGE VRAINAQE 01!10^20 HOUSTON PLAGF/SENA DRAINAGE 480,000 480,000 DRAINAGE 0210-22 HIGHLAND PARK ROAD 167' 16?'~ DRAINAGE . 0810.23 EAST HICKORY STREET DRAINAGE 162'000 162,000 0 } DRAINAGE 08W24 SOUTH RUDDELL ST. DRAINAGE 52'~ ,000 15,,0 DRA[NAGB 0810-25 PECAN CREEK ^ RUADELI. TO WCx1DROW ~ 252,0000 0' DRAINAGE 016[4 26 OAKLAND STREET DRAINAGE 1'[65'000 1,185,000 907,000 ~ ooo i; U.RAINAAE 0810-27 NORTHRIDGE DRAINAGE 734,000 234,000 DRAINAGE 0810-28 STRICKLAND JUNIOR 111011 79,000 1 D.RAINA0H 0810-29 GOOD SAMARITAN VILLAGE 79 ,000 1 DRAINAGE 0810-29B GOOD SAMARITAN VILLAGE-RF.VISFD 22222,E 35511,000 DRXWAGB 0810-30 EVERS PARKWAY DRAINAGE 2,000 222,000 DR~'.INAGE 0810-31 SHADY OAU DRAINAGE 17,E 17'000 565,000 565,001} DRAINAGE 0810-32 ECPOR STREET DRAINAGE 611,000 611,000 AIRPORT 001906 CONSTRUCT NORTH HOLDING APRON 9,000 86,000 AIRPORT 001907 LAND ACQUISITION FOR 1500' F,XTN NORTEi 95,000 AIRPORT W1908 EXTENDED NORTH RUNWAY/TAXIWAY 1500' 139,000 1,25..,000 1,391,000 195,000 1,750,000 1,945,000 AIRPORT 001909 EXECUTIVE ITT PARKING APRON 100'X150' 24,000 218,000 242,000 AIRPORT 001910 COMMERCIAL SERVICE APRON 480'X150' 20,000 176 000 196,000 PLANNING 001$07 BEAUTIFICATION 017 UNIVBRSITY DR. IT 11 396,000 395,(1)0 791,000 PLANNING 001511 HIGHWAY 77 BEAUTIFICATION 278,000 278,000 556,000 20,000 LIBRARY 007003 LIBRARY PHASE It 1,7W,W0 1,700,000 284,000 PARKS 006205 DENIA CENTER EXPANSION/RENOVATION 1,250,000 1,250,000 .._n 7,500 y mks MAO r" W WAPM e~.aae Raa4w raraaw, rr~'s>;r ra3,~3 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL GOVERNMENT - ANNUAL AID OPERATING DIVISION PROJECT BOND IN AND. DEPARTMENT NUMBER ~ PROJFCT NAME FUNDS CONSTRUCTION OTHER TOTAL~MAINTENANC$ OTHER PROJECTS SUBMITTED' PARKS 006MI UPGRADE EXISTING PARK SYSTEM 1,500,000 19500,000 100004 PARKS 006302 SCHOOL PRACTICE FIELDS 330,000 330,000 34,000 PARKS 006303 TOWNSHIP H NEIGHBORHOOD PARK ACQUIS & DEV 2251000 225,000 3500m 1,500 000 1,500,000 45,000 PARKS 006304 OUTDOOR AMPHITHEATRE PARKS 006305 CIVIC CENTER PARK RENOVATION & IMPROVEMT 1,050,000 f,050,000 2000 PARKS 006306 NORTHEAST COMMUNITY PARK ACQUISITION 250,000 250,000 6,000 PARKS 00601 EVER$ PARK ACQUISMON/DEVELOPMENT 7500000 750,040 25opm PARKS 006305 MACK PARK ACQUSITIONIDEVELOPMENT 750,000 750,000 25,000 PARKS 006309 DENIA PARK ACQUSTTIONIDEVELOPMENT 7500000 750,000 30,000 PARKS 006310 NORTH LAKES PARKS DEVELOPMENT PHASE II 1,700,000 1,700,000 $0,000 FACILITY MOT 00020T ENERGY MANAGEMENTlHVAC 276,000 276,WO FACILITY MOT 000204 SMALL. BUSINESS INCUBATOR 115,000 I1:,•^00 730,000 317'000 1200,040 FACILITY MOT 000205 PHASE It & III SPACE IMPLEMENTATION N6 200,000 FACILITY MOT 000205 CITY HALL FIRE SPRINKLERS 131,000 131,000 3,000 FACILITY MOT 0011209 NEW ROOF FOR ONE UTILITY FUND BLDINO 175,0011 175,040 FIRE 005401 OUTDOOR WARNING SYSTEM 300,000 300,000 6 i 4i : a O 6,004 'y; PROJECTS SUBMITTED IN PRIOR YEARS DRAINAGE COOPER CREEK CHANNEL PHASE Il 1,251,000 1,251,000 4,000 DRAINAGE PECAN CREEK DRAINAGE NEW ROBERTSON 607,000 607,040 DRAINAGE PECAN CREEK ALONG UNIVERSITY 322,000 322,000 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: - 0010 - - - - _ Pro t:- BERNARD STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE _ Maw Pro 1 Number: 6010-6b - EstlmatedCost, _ $1,461,600-- - - Pro}ect Deserlptlon; PROVIDE 45 FOOT STREET ING,UDING CURB AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK BETWEEN EAGLE DRIVE AND HICKORY STREET, Benefils/Pu pose PROVIDE ADDITIONAL CAPACITY AND PROPER DRAINAGE ON BERNARD STREET WHICH WAS DESIGNED FOR SINGLE FAMILY USE BUT HAS INCREASING MULTIFAMILY USE, _ Task Schedule {Monlh/Yeary Desl n Bid Construct ComPleled B Innirt Dale; JAN-97 ' APR-97 JUN-97 _ Endin Date; MAR-97 MAY -97 DEC-97 - R-- Constructfon Fundln Schedule $1,000'6) Fundl Source Prior 92-93 83_84 Exlating Bonds 94-95 _ 95-96 9697 Total Auth/Unlssued Bonds _ $0 Aid in Const. $0 Other $0 Total $1,462 $0 $O $4 61,482 Construction Fundin Costs $1,000'g $U $0 $1,462 51,462 P Lisblil Source - Prior 92-93 93-94 94-96 w ~ Services - 95-96 96-9--7 Tote! f Land $240 62nD ( Construction $76 $76 Other Total - $1,187 $1,1e7 - $0 $0 S4 - $0 $1,462 O ratio au tCosta $1.00019 $0 $1,462 gdlture Type 92-93 93-94 - - i Personal Services 94-95 959fi- 96-97 Total Supplies - - - Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total - ~Q $0 $0 awuw ~uuu~ 'ter , cam ~!t+rn a asmxy .,nor w+a... r.-...d. .ar.~..., a•++•.u-:« res+a 6wtw1 NsYi1#f iYF.~k1 IWI.~fl H9flM 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund; 0010 _ _ Project: _ WILLOWOOD_PAVING AND DRAINAGE T Project Number; 0010-56 T ` Estimated Cost; Project Description; REBUILD WILLOWWOOD STREET TO A 41 FOOT STREET WITH CURB AND GUTTER. ALSO, INSTALL ADEQUATE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. (BONNIE BRAE TO SanaNts/Purpose; PROVIDE SAFE ADEQUATE PAVEMENT SECTION ON A COLLECTOR TRAVELED TO SHOPPING, SCHOOLS AND ALSO REMEDY LOCAL DRAINAGE PROBLEMS, Task Scheduie (MonthlYear) Design_ Bid Construct Completed ~e~inn~ Date; JAN-97 JUL~97 OCT-97- Ehdln Dg(el JUN-97 AUG-97 SEP-99 _ Construction Fundln Schedula~,000's) Funding Source Prior 92.93 93-94 94-95 95-96 _ 96-97_ Total - Existing Bonds $0 Auth/Unissued Bonds $0 Aid In Cosst, $0 Other -__$2,777 _ $2,777 Total $0 $0 _$2,777 $2,777 - Construction Fundln Costs 00 Is) Liabill SoUroe Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Services $240 - $240 Land $60 $60 Construction $2,477 $2,477 Other $0 Total $0 _ $0 $0 _ _$0 ~$0 $2,77Y - _ $2.777 _ Opera inBud at Costs $1,000's Ex ndituie yee _ 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 ----96-.97 Total - Personal Services ~$0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 ----$-0- - - - Total $0 $0 - - ~0 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MYRTLE STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE - - LPROVIDE -_ooin umber 0010-57 d Cost: escri ption; PROVIDE 31 FOOT_EET WITH i1AND GTTER LK ON ONE SIDE, AND ADEQUATE DRAINAGE, CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN COLLINS AND DAUGHERTY STREETS. PUfpo&e; SOLVE IDE ADEQUATE ACCESS TO BUSINESSES IN THE AREA. - - Task Schedule (Monlh/Ye--ar) _ Desl n Bid Construct Completed ~tfl InninDate; JAN-97 SEP-97 - NQV_gj - dln Rate; JUN-97 OCT-97 MAR-98 - _ Cons Uuctian Fundln Schedule ($T-,06 Fundln ; ource Prior 92-93 93-94 94-9- 95- 96-97 Existing Bonds Total Auth/Unissued Bonds $0 Aid in Const $0 Other _ $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 ---$649_ - $649_ Construction i andir) Costs $11 000'8 ~ $0 _ $fi49 $649 lability Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total _]4 Services Land $65 $Construction $160 $1Other $424 $4Total - $0 $d $0 $0 $649 $60 ratln Bu et costs $1,00016 F ure T w 92~-93 - 93-94 94-95 95-96 _ 96-97 Total l Services - $0 nc6 $0 $0 ice $0 $0 sots $0 - $0~ $0 $0 - - $0 - _ - - - - $0 $0 _ - _ $0 :MkS+:1 rt-aa!4A'si 7aW~KA x441 'rY/.i x:: s4L, k-.+:'s;j+.c 4AIif+°: kldi~~J 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0010 ap Project: COLLINS STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE PH II Project Number: 0010-5B _ Estimated Cast: $689,850 Pro)W Description: PROVIDE A 41 FOOT STREET_BETWEEN_C_ARAOLL BLVD. AND WELCH STREET. PROJECT INCLUDES SIDEWALK AND DRAINAGE. _ Benefits/Purpose: THIS PROJECT WILL CONSTAUC7 PHASE II OF - THE COLLECTOR STREET TO DIRECT DALLAS DRIVE TRAFFIC TO UNT AT WELCH STREET. Task Schedule {Month/Year) Design Bid Construct Completed Beginning Date: JAN-97 AUG-97 OCT-97 Ending Date: MAY-97 SEP-97 APR-98~ _ Construction Fundin Sohodule ($1,000's) Funding Source Prior_ 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total_ - Existing Bonds _ $0 AuthJUnlssued Bonds $0 Ald In Const, $0 Other $690 $690 Total $0 $0 _$0 $690 $690 Construction Fundin Costs $1,000'6 Llabilit source Prior 02-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Services-- $64 $64 Flo Land $65 $65 Constructlon $561 $561 Other $0 T -$0 $0 ------$690 O ratio Bud et Costs $1,000'x) Expenditure T92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-9% Total Personal Services $0 Supplles $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ~s d~ 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund, 0010 Ma .Project: _ MAPLE STREET PAVING AND DAPdNAGE Project Number, 0010-59 Estimated Cost; $612,150 - Project Desalplton; PROVIDE 41 FOOT STREET BETWEEN AVE D AND WELCH STREET WITH SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE AND ADEQUATE DRAINAGE. Senefits/Purpose; PROVIDE IMPROVED ACCESS THROUGH LINT CAMPUS BY REPAIRING DAMAGED STREET AND UPGRADING DESIGN FEATURES. Task Schedule (Month/Year) Dosign Bid Construct Com plated Be Innlnp Dater JAN-97 AU G-97 OCT .97 Ending Date, JUN-97 SEP-917 - Construction Fundin Schedule ($1,000'x) Funding Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Tatal Existing Bonds $0 AuttVUnIssued Bonds $0 Aid In Const. $0 Other _ $612 $612 Total J $0 $0 $0 ---$0 - SO $612 $612 Construction Funding Costs $1,000'§ Liability Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 ~96-97 Total _ Services $57 ` - - $57 Land $53 $53 Construction $502 $502 Other - - $0 Total $612 $612 Operating Bud at Costs $1,000's - Ex nditure Type 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 $0_ _ $0 - - $0 $0 - $0 ,w~ar, .,yew+ <gyYrg ,,may s'SM-~ rrh.? EfliYC4 e1r.:< 2i s.34cFz" I'1R~+i. MAW RRVX~I 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund; 0010-ap- - - Pro ect: KINGS ROW PAVING AND DRAINAGE Pro ect Number: 0010-60 Estimated Cost: $2,134,650 Projdot Description; PROVIDE A 4 LANE ARTERIAL SECTION WITH MEDIAN BETWEEN SHERMAN DRIVE AND LOOP 288. PROJECT INCLUDES DRAINAGE AND SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE. BenatitelPUrpose: ' PROVIO~ ADDITIONAL CAPACITY ON KINGS ROW AND ACCESS TO LOOP 288 FOR MUCH OF NORTHEAST DENTON. Task Schedule (Month/Year) Desl n Bid Construct CompI ot©d - Be Inning Date JAN-97 SEP-07 DEC-97 Endin Date: AUQ-97 OCT-97 N V-96 - Construction Full_ Schedule ($1,00 is) Funding Source Prior 92-93 _ 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total - $0 Existing Bonds $0 AuthlUnlssued Bonds Aid In Const. $0 $2,135 $2,135 Other - - - Total - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _$2,135 - - $2,135 Construction Fundln Costs L51,000'sL _ Uablll BOUrce Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 96-98 96-97 $216 Tota $216 Servic Land es $85 $85 Land $1,835 $1,835 Construction $0 Other - Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,135 $2,135 O ratin Bud et costs $1,A00's _ - t;x nditure T 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 - Total- $0 Personal Services $2 $2 Suppiles $2 $2 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets - _----_$0 ---0 - ---Q - $0 $4 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM r8HERMAN EAST WIDIVE PAVING AND DRAINAGE [Map-~ p010-61 m WIDEN WINDSOR DRIVE TO 45 FEET BETWEEN E AND BRISTOL COURT, PROJECT INCLUDES SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE AND ASSOCIATED DRAINAGE. 8eneflls/Purposa: OPEN UP EXISTING BOTTLE NECK IMPROVING TRAFFIC FLOW IN THE AREA. Task Schedule (Month/Year) _ Design Did Construct Completed BA Inn1n Date, FEB-97 SEP-97 NOV-97 Endln Date; JUN-97 OCT-97 tr- 4AR--9~-8 _ Construction Fundin Schedule 1 00 ' Fundin Source Prior 92.93 93-94-- 94-95 1 0 S~ g5 g6 - Existing Bonds - - 96-97 Total - - AuttVUnissued Bonds $0 Aid In Const, $0 Other _ $0 Total ~0 - - $704 $704 $o - _ o $704 $704 Construction Fundin Gosis $t,ooo's) _ aQ 1_Iabill Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 k-9-6-- 96-97 Total Services _ Land $65 $fi5 Construction $35 $35 Other $604 $604 Total $0- $0 - _ $0 _ $0 $0 $704 - - 0 0 ratln 13ud et costs $t,owls $704 -70 EX ndliura Typo 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-9& 96-97 Total-- Personal Services Supplies ---so Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total ° - - ......+..i Mti.. ni-`fri. -:Y.1YZ:' e•,4llv!h t;yyy:LY (?%MRG' fa~~'/1 troYi{'Y ~~4~fi RIr~ F~9i!~n 8~~735,. 2Ri~7. 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0010 Map Pro ect: WEST WINDSOR DRIVE PAVING AND DRAINAGE Project Number - 0010-62 Estimated Cost: $3,129,000 PtOjaat t awlptlon: ADD 2 ADDITIONAL LANES TO WINDSOR DRIVE AND REBUILD EXISTING LANES BETWEEN HINKLE DRIVE AND BONNIE BRAE, INCLUDES LANDSCAPED MEDIAN AND SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE. Benefits/Purposw IMPROVE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AROUND NORTH LAKES PARK, Task Schedule (MonihlYear) Design Bid _ Construct Completed SB Innln Date: JAN-97 AUG-97 OCT_97 nding Date: JUN-97 SEP-97 - SIP=98 _ Construction Fundlnq Schedule $1,000's) Funding Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-96 95-96 96_97 - Total Existing Bonds $0 AuttVUnlssued Bonds $0 Aid In Const. $0 Other $3,129 $3,129 - 3, - - • Totat _ $0 _.__$0 $0 $0 $0 $3,1-29 $3,129 Construction Funding Costs S$1,00o's Liability Source Prior - 9243 93-94 - 94-95 95-96 96-97 - Total Services $260 $260 Land $0 Construction $2,609 $2,609 Other ---$260 - $260 Total $0 -$0 $0 $0 _--_$0 - $3,129 $3,129 _ 0 ratin Bud et Costu $1,000A Expenditure 722 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 - 96-97_ Total Personal Services V - $0 Supplies $1 $1 Maintenance $1 $1 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 - - Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $z -------2- 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund; -_0010 - - - - Pr~ecL _ _ _ _ SOUTH BONNIE BRAE PAVlIJG AND DRAINAGE _ - Pro ct Number; - Ma 0010-6- 3 Estimated`` _ $2, s7- ,2oo PraJect gescrlption PROVIDE 45 FOOT STREET WITH CURB AN D - GUTTER, SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE, AND DRAINAGE. PROJECT LIMITS ARE FM 1515 TO WILLiWWO0D STREET, 86nefils/Purposa; PROVIDE MUCH NEEDED REPAIR TO BADLY DAMAGED STREET AND IMPROVE ACCESS TO SCHOOLS AND HOMES IN THE AREA WHILE SOLVING AN ONGOING DRAINAGE PROBLEM, Task Schedule (Mo'nlh/Yea_r)-Dest n Bid Construct Completed - Be inn{ng pate; JAN-O_ AUG-97 DEC-97' ndln Date; JUL-97 SEP-97 _ M_AR-98 =Consl1 Source Construclion Fundin Schedule $1,o00's} rior 92_93 ` 93-94 94-95 6 97 ow-- Existing 95-g - 96- ` T - - Aid In 0 $0 50 - _ $0 $0 - $2,167 $2,167 Construotion Fundi n Costs $1,ooo-s $2,167 Iaabllit Source - $0 52,167 Prior 92-93 93-94 ` 94-95 ` - Services - 95-96 6 96-97 Total Lend - $220 1~2 Construction $60 Other Total $o so - --ratrn But costs r$1 000's ~0 167 Ex ndllure.T -w Personal Services 92-93 93-94 94-96 95-96 - - 96-97 -Total _ Supplies Maintenance - $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Tote! - - $0 $0 $0 50 a 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - un : 0010 - ~M~-- ProJect: MAYHILL ROAD_PAVING AND D_ AAINAGE PH I Project Number: 0010-64 - Estimated Cost: $4,647,300 Pro*I Description: PROVIDE 45 FOOT STREET BETWEEN US 380 ANQ - McKINNEY WITH SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE, DRAINAGE, BRIDGE AT COOPER CREEK, AND TURN LANES AT 380 AND McKINNEY, _ eenetitslPUrpOS0: PROVIDE SAFE AND EASY ACCESS TO AREAS OF DENTON EAST OF AND ALONG MAYHILL ROAD. ADDRESS TRAFFIC SAFETY ISSUE AT MAYHILL AND McKINNE_Y,_ _ Task S%hedule (Month/Year} _ Desl n Bid Construct Completed Be Innis Data: JAN-97 DEC_97 - MAY-98 - - [Ending Dace: NOV-97 JAN-98 SEP-9L Construction Fundln Schedule ($1,000's} Furldln Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds $0 AuthlUnissued Bands $0 Aid in Const. $0 Other $4,647 $4,647 Total $0 $0 $0 ---$0 - $0 -$4,647 $4,6471 Construction Funding Costs $1,000's _ _ I~abili +SOUroe Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Tclal Services - $420 $4?0 Land $1 Constructlon 80 $180 $4,047 $4,047 Other $0 Total J $o ~$0 $0 $0 $4 647 $4,647 Operating Bud ei Costs $1,000's Ex vndlture -Type 92-93 9394 94-96 95-96 96-97 To1sl Personal Services - - - - --$0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total a 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0010 a A- -AND-DRAINA Project: MAYHILL_ROAD PAVING_GE PWIII Project Number: 0010-65 % Estimated Cost, _$3,605,950 ProlectDescriptlon; PROVIDE 45 FOOT STREET BETWEEN MOKINNEY AND SPENCER ROAD INCLUDING SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE, BRIDGE AT PECAN CREEK, DRAINAGE, AND TURN LANES. BaneNtslPUrpose: "PROVIDE SAFE AND eASY ACCESS TO AREAS EAST AND ALONG MAYHILL ROAD, ADDRESS TRAFFIC SAFETY ISSUES AT McKINNEY STREETS _ Task Schedule (Month/Year) De n-- Bid _ Construct Com lotod - Be Innin Dated JAN-97 JAN-98 - MAR-98 NOV-97 FEBJ96 ~B 99 Irnding Dater Constructlon Fundln Schedule $1,s00 s) 96 97 _ Total Funding Source Prior 92-93 - 9394 _ 94-95 9 $O Existing Bonds $0 Auth/Unlssued Bonds Aid in Const. $0 $3,506 $3.606 - - - Other $0 $O ~p g0 $3-,506 $3 606 - - Total Construction Funding Costs $1,000's Prior 92-93 93-94 94•-96 95-96 96-97 -Total --50 Llabili Source - - $350 AV Services $3 $160 $160 Land $3,006 $3,006 Constructlon - $0 Other - $p $3,506 $3,606 - Total $0 - - Operating Bud at Costs $1,00'0 Tota 92-93 93-94 94-96 95-96 96-97 p±ndIture.lypel TO Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance b0 $0 ° Fixed Assets - $0 $0 - - Total 0 i.a s .i x 149 of Simi "#A. ht49"l tFatJY.?] away W13 gxi wow-1 MOM ppRgry 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0010 Pro cV MAYHILL ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE PH lil map Pro ect Number: 0010-66 Estimated Cost: $2,545,200 Project Description.- PROVIDE 45 FOOT STREET BETWEEN SPENCER AOA AND COLORADO BLVD. INCLUDING SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE, DRAINAGE, AND TURN LANES, BenetitWPurpose: PROVIDE SAFE AND EASY ACCESS TO AREAS EAST ALONG MAYHILL ROAD, WILL REPLACE UNSAFE RAILROAD CROSSING. Task Schedule (Month/Year) Design Bid _ Construct Completed tae Innin Rata: JAN-97 NO V-97 JAN-93 Endin Date: SEP-97 DEC-97 _-DEC-96 Construcllon Funding Schedule $1,000's) _ Fundin Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 ^ Total Existing Bonds - - --$0 AuthlUnlssued Bonds $0 Aid in Cosst- $0 Other $2,545 $2,546 Total _ - - - - $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 _ $2 645 - $2,545 _ COnSiruollon FffUOOl , - 000's _ Uabilit Source Prior 92-93 -95 96-96 96-97 _ Total Services _ 5270 270 Land $ 130 $130 Construction $2,145 $2,145 Other $0 Total $a $0 $0 $0 - $2,645 $2,645 7ratIn udget C osts 193-94 94-95 96-97 Total Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 $o $0 - $o 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0010 - - IM11'-__ pro ect: MASCH BRANCH ROAD PHASE 4 - Pro act Number: 0010-67 Estimated Cosl, ,061,800 Prot pescrlption; PROVIDE 27 FOOT ROAD BETWEEN SPAINGSIDE ROA AND FM 2449 WITH CURB AND GUTTER, BRIDGE AT HICKORY CREEK, AND DRAINAGE, t3-netils/PUfpose: ' COMPLETE LINK BETWEEN HWY 380 AND FM 2449 TO EASE TRAFFIC CONGESTION AT FM 1515 AND BONNIE BRAE. Task Schedule (Month/Year) Design Bid Consiruct Gomplotod ee Innln bate: JAN-97 NOV-97 JAN-98 - - Iwndfn Date: SEP-97 DEC-97 DEC-98 ~ Construction Fundln$Schaduh($1,040's) 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Funding Scuroe Prior 92-93 T$O Existing Bands - - $0 AuthJUnls~ued Bonds $0 Aid in Const, $0 Other $3.062 53,062 To181 x3,062 53,062 0 Construction R indin Costs $1,00o's ~ 60urce~ Prior 92-93 93-94 _ 94-95 95-96 96 97 _ Yotal _ Services _ $300 $300 Land Construction $400 $400 Other $2,362 $2,362 - - - r- - - $0 Total $0 $0 $U $0 - $0 $3,062 $3,062 satin Bud et Costs $1,000 '6L-- Ex ndlture_Tylpe 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97~ Total Personal Services $0 Suppllos Maintenance $0 Services $0 $U Debt Service $0 Insurance Fixed Assets $0 Total - - - - $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 ....Y,v.. ....,,.a... ...sw. ~w•-n evn=a ...,.x^:s n.s!.v:ef thBY!r w'+k-` F9SY "t la i57 11k$uY.~ ifKSeffFz b i4 ~t ARM wivmk! 1992-97 CAPITAL, IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0010 project: RINEY ROAD _ PAVING N_ D Ma , DRAINAGE- Pro ect Number: 0.010-72 _ Estimated Cost - $235,200 - _ f;roJW Description: PROVIDE 41 FOOT STREET BETWEEN_ WINDSOR DRIV AND HWY 77 INCLUDING SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE AND CURB AND GUTTER. Bonefil6JPUfpOSg UPGRADE ACCESS FOR RINEY--R-6- ROAD DUE 70 YMCA, CITY PARKS, NORTHRIDGE SUBDIVISION AND OTHER INSTITUTIONAL USES IN THE AREA, Task Schedule (Monlh/Yow) Desfgn Bld Construct Com~Ieted ni - EndlnDate: AN 97 MAR-97 AUG 97 Construction Fuhdln Schedule $1,000'x) Funding Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-9b - 95-96 9ti-97 Total _ Existing Ronds - - - $0 Auth/Unissued Bonds $0 Aid In Const $0 Other $235 $236 Total $0 $0 _ $0 _ $0 i_ _ $0 $235 $236 Construction Fundin Costs Llabili Source Prior 92-93 93--94 94-96 95-96 96-97 Total- Services $23 $23 Land $0 Construction $212 $212 Other $0 Total $0 $o $U $0 $235 - $235 0 rating gud et Costs $1,000's - Ex nditure Type 92-93 93-~94 94-95 95-96 - 96-97 Expenditure Personal Services - $p Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets _ $0 Total - $0 - $0 ------$0 --.$0 - - $0 $0 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM kilMn~CHRISI)ISTALr , ot: MASCH BRANCHR0AD PHASE i - ct Numbe: 0010-73 alod Cosot escrltion: PROVIDE 27 FOOT ROAD BETWEEN HWY 380 AND ROAD INCLUDING DRAINAGE AND CURB AND GUTTER, Benefits/ft tirpose; ' PROVIDE IMPROVED ACCESS TO 360 FROM INDUSYRIAL AREA AROUND THE AIRPORT. Task Schedule (Month/Year) Design _ Bld construct_ Completed tae Innin Date: OCT-96 MAR-97 MAY-97 cndln AAte FEB-97 APR-97 MAR-88 F- _ Construction Frmdin Schedule $1,000'6) Eundin Source Prior 192-93 83-94 94-8G - - 05-96 86-97 Total Existing Bonds Auth/Unlssued Bonds $0 Ald In Cons . $0 Other $0 $772 $772 Total -$$0 $p- - 2 $0 $o $7i2 - $772 Construction Fundln Costs $1,000's W- Liablli Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-85 95-96 96-97 Total Servica3 - - - - - $70 ~$70 Land Construction $60 Other $6642 42 $6$0 42 Total $0 _ _$0 - $0 $o - - $o $772 - - $a $772 Q ratin Bud at - rPeersonal nditur@ 7 92-93 96-88 96-97 Total Services lies $0 enence $0 ces $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total --0 $0 $0o $o " om - .<.a ttEax+?-i a=wFw.ebwNY.suae~ak 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM L MASCH BRANCH ROAD PHASO 2 - - - - Nurn bor - ted Cast 001 o-7a~"~ 9e8crl tlon; $2,010,750 p PROVIDE p7 F0_0T STREET BETWEEN FM 1515 AND fAFREA 010 RISTAL ROAD INCLUDING CURB AND GRTTER AND DRAINAGE EXISTI ES WILL BE UTILIZED , ulpose,IMPROE ACNDROUND AIRPORT. Desi n ask Schedule ( MonthlYear) ------._.-.g B6glnnin Date;_ 81d OCT-96 - Construct Com Toted !"ndin Date; JUN-97 AU_G-97 MAY-97 JUL-97 ~ SEP-98 - Fundin Sou cr Construction Fundin~Schedule 51,000's) _ - Existing Bonds Prior 92"93 93-94 94-95 - - - _ _ _ Auth/Unissued Bonds 95-96 %-97 I l - Aid in Const, $0 Other $0 Total _ $0 $2,01$2 0$0 Ltabili Sau cr @ Construction Fundfn O 0 $2,Prior 92-93 Costs 000 s _$2,011 Services - 93-94 94-95 - - Land - f'6-96 96-97 - Tolai Construction $200 ' _$200 Other $240 $240 Total - $1,571 $0 _ $1,571 _ $0 _ _ IIEx rldiEurePeratpe IngBud elCoslss$1,000i8 a0 - `$0_ $200 Personal Services 92-93 93-94 94-95 Supplies 95-96 96-97 Total Maintenance -'---$0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 $0 `$0------- $0 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund; 0010 Pro eci; - C -F BRANCH ROA -D-PHASE 3 - Ma Pro act Number; 0010-75 Estlmated Costi $1,430,100 PrOjeCf pescrlptl0n; PROVIDE 27 FOOT ROAD BETWEEN FM 1515 AND SPRINGSIDE ROAD INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER AND DRAINAGE. Benatits1Purpose' ALLIVIATE TRAFFIC CONGESTION AT 1515 AND BONNIE BRAI BY PROVIDING A LINK TO 1-35 TO THE SOUTH. Task Schedule (MonihlYear) Desi n Bid _ Construct Completed _ Be innfn Date: OCT-96 MAY-97 JUL-97_ ndln pate; APR -97 JUN-97 AUG-98 Construction Fundin Schedule 51,000'8} _ Funding Source - Prior 92-93 93-94 94-96 Total 95-96 96-97 Existing Bands _ AuttVUnissued Bonds $0 Aid In Contt. $0 Other $0 Total $0 $1,490_ $1,430 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$-1,430- $1,430 F1 ConstructionFundin Costs $1,000'8 _ Liabill Source Por_ 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 _ Total Services Land $140 J~43 Construction $350 Other $940 Total $o so - so $o - _ - --O rtan Bud et Costs $1O $ $0 $1,430 EX r4tursT 92-93 93-94 94-95 '-96 Total Personal Services - - - Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total - $0 $0 $0 $0 - .__m-~ _._r... ...rm. rwsw„ .•wn*.~ •..<rwra Jswum wew.01 w~'A bf A ~SMd464 kwim,. 4"W Wiwi; to"" w"" amgkfl+f 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0010 _ lMa~_ Pro ct: SOUTHEAST DENTON SIDEWALKS Pro ect Number: 0010-76 Estimated Cost' $109,200 _ _ Project Description: PROVIDE SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE OF MORSE STREE (ROBERTSON TO WOODROW), DUNCAN STREET {MORSE TO WILLOW SPRIN KERLY STREET (DUNCAN TO ,SHADY OAKS). Henellts/PUrpose: PROVIDE A SYSTEM OF PEDESTRIAN ACCESS IN SOUTHEAST DENTON ALONG MAJOR STREETS, EXISTING PATHS INDICATE USAGE, _ Task Sche~lute (MonlhJYear) Desl n Bid Construct Completed Be innin$Vale: - OCT-96 _ JAN-97 _ MAR-97_ Ending $ale, DEC-96 FEB-97^ JUNN-97 - _ Construction Fundln~Schedule ($1 000'8) _ - fundin Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 T6-97 T Total - Exlsting Bonds - - - - - $0 Auth/Unlssued Bonds $0 Aid In Cons[, $0 Other _ _ $109 $109 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $109 $109 Construction Fundin Costs $1,000'8 _ Llablllt Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 ` - Total Services - $10 ~$10 Land $2 $2 Construction $97 $97 Other $0 Total _ $0 $0 $0 $0 - -$0 - 5109 $109 O ralln Bu et Costs $1,000'8 Ex nditure Type 92-93 93-94 94-9b 95-96 96-97 Total Personal Services - _ $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total - $0 -$o $0 - $0- --$0 - -$0 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Pro t STATE SCHOOL ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE Project Numben 0010-077 _ Estimated Cost: $12020,000 Projectt7escription: REBILD STATE SCHOOL ROAD AS A 45' BACK TO BACK STREET WITH CURB AND GUTTER INCLUDING NECESSARY DRAINAGE IMPROVMENTS. SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE. ~eaafitslPurpose PROVIDE ADEQUATE RAVED SURFACE FOR ACCESS WIMBLTON VILLAGE, BRIARWOOD, AND STATE SCHOOL. CURRENTLY IN VE POOR CONDITION. - Task Schedule (Month/Year) Design Bid Construct Completed *WE~7 te: OCT-9o -NAY-97 JUL-97- JUN-97 _ DEC-97 - Construoti0n Fundln Schedule ($1,000's) rce Prior 92-93 - 93-94 94-95-__ 95-96 96-97 _ - Total $0 Fundin SoE(06-- Existing Bonds $0 AutK/Unissued Bonds $0 Ald In Const. $1,020 - $1,020 Other - Total $0 - _ $0 $0 $0 $0 -$1,020 $1,020 Construction Funding Costs $1,000's x Liability Souroe Prior T 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 - 96-97 Services $148 Total $148 Land $0 $$72 $8$0 Construction $0 Other Total $0 - $0 $0 _ $0 __.SO $1,020 S'1,020 Operating Bud et Costs $1,00016 ~ x nditureT 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 _ Tole1$0 Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 FlxedAssets Total $0 $0 - -J - - $0 $0 $0- $ , nc04 WMKI7 V4&" x¢..17 #N 1 "arm, Woo" "mu" .se~e a+e~n' ~mx+ea a wx ..arms iwu.ree 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0010 Pro Oct: HICKORY CREEK ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE pro ect NumUer; 0010-076 EetimatedGast: $601,000 Prot 0escflptlon: REBUILD HICKORY CHEEK ROAD FROM 2181 TO BOUNDARY OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. NEW STREET WOULD BE A 24' ESTATE SECTION WITH UPGRADED CROSS DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, f natitslPUrp0s@: PROVIDE SAFE ACCESS BETWEEN MCNAIR ELEMENT SCHOOL AND RESIDENCES Task Schedule (~AOnthlYear) - Design Bid Construct Coo nplote-d tEn!din nning Date' OCT-96 APR-97 JUN-97 ' patg; MAR-97 MAY _-97 NO V-97 ) Construction Fundlh Schedule $1,00,0-s - To Fundln SauroO Prior 92-93 93-9A 94-95 96-96 _ 9697 Total $0 Existing Bonds $0 Auth/Unlssued Bonds $0 Aid In Cosst, $601 $601 Other $601 J $601 Total $0 $0 $U $0 _ - Construction Fundln Costs $1,000.6 Uabill soforCe ` Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 a87 Total $67 Services $0 Land $614 $614 Construction $0 Other - - Total $0 L----- $U $0 $o ---$601 $601 0 ratln Sud et Gosts $i,ooo Ex ndltufe T 92-93- 93-94 94-95 96-96 96-97_ Total $0 Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Flied Assets - - - - - - $p - $0 $0 $0 Total - 1992-97 CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0010 - Ma - Pro eot~~ HIGHLAND STREET SIDEWALK Project Number: -0010-79 Estimated Cost: $23,500 Project Description: CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK ALONG HIGHLAND STREET F CARROLL BOULEVARD TO BERNARD STREET. Beneflts/Purpose;; PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FOR STUDENTS - BETWEEN UNT AND HOUSING AREAS. Task Schedule (MonthlYear) Design BId Construct Completed - se innln Date; JAN-97 _ MAY-97 JUL-97 Endlne;; Date: APR-97 JUN-97 OCT-97 Construction Fundln Schedule $1,000'sj Funding Source Prior 92-93 - 93-94 94-95 95-96__- 96-97 'Total Exlsting Bonds $0 AuthlUnlasu9d Bonds $0 Aid In Const. $0 Other $24 $24 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $24 $24 _ Construction Furldin Gosts $1,000's _ flablli °souroe Prior 92-93 93-94- 94-98 95-96 - 96-97 - Total Services $3 $3 Land $1 $1 Construction $20 $20 _ $0 Other Total $0 - $0 $0 _ SO - $0 ---$24 - - $24 Q ratin Bu et t~% nditure-~ 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total - Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 "NW14 w0w. pfw*A i amt wm" awl" 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0010 Ma Project: AVENUE A PAVW_G_- Pro t Number; 0010-081_ Estimated 00SG $114,400_ v Pro*t Description; REBUILD AVENUE A BETWEEN PRAIRIE STREET AND CHESTNUT STREET. STREET WOULD REMAIN CURRENT WIDTH. MOCKINGBIRD. _ _ Seneflis/Purpose: REPLACE OLD PAVEMEMT AND CURB AND GUTTE_R ARE IN POOR REPAIR. Task Schedule (Month/Year) Design Bid - Construct Completed KeRnning Ending Date: JOAN 97 MAY 97 OCT 97 _ - - Construction Funding Schedule $1,OJ0's) _ Funding Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-_9_7 Total Existing Bonds $0 Auth/Unissued Bonds $0 Aid In Const, $0 Other _ $114 $114 Total $0 $0 $0 _ $0 --_-SO - - - $114 $114 _ Construction Fundin Costs $1,000's~ _ Liability Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Services $20 $20 Land $0 Construction $95 $95 Other $0 TOtal _ $0 $0 _$0 _ $0 $0 $114 $114 OperatIng Bu et Costs 000,6) Ex ncilture Type 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Personal Services $0 - Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets _ $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund:: __~---0010 - Pro L' SCRIPTURE STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE LEA - - Pro act Number 0010-082 - - Estimated COSt; $1 087 7,000 W0,16 tOescrlption; 14EBUILD SCRIPTURE STREET BETWEEN BONNIE BRA JAGOE STREET, NEW STREET WOULD BE 41' BACK TO BACK, PROVIDE SID WALK AN ONE SIDE, Bane(haJPurPQ$i PROVIDE NEW PAVEMENT AND CURB -AN-07G UTTER REPLACING THAT IN POOR REPAIR, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE IN A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT EXPERIENCES SOME FLOODING IN HEAVY RAINS. Task Schedules Month/fear) Desl n_ Bid _ Construct Com loled_ ee innin gate; OCT-96 JUN-9i Ending gate; MAY-97 JUL-97 , ~ Co nstruction Fundln Schedule ($1,o0o's) Fun in Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-9fi 96-97 Existing Bonds Total Bonds - ap Aid In ConsL $0 Other $0 Total $0 $0 SU _ $1,087 _ $1,087 $av $0 $1,087 $1,087 Ccnsiructlon Fundin Costs $1,000-s hlabill Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-96 95-98 _ 96-97~_~ Total - Services Land $184 - $184 Construction $10 $10 Other $893 $893 Total ~0 _$0 _ $p - - - $0 $0 $0 $1,087 - $1,087 O ratio bud Personal l Se t Costs $1,040'x) - PX Se Trvices 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 9--97 Total - Supplles $0 Maintenance $p Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $p Total $0 - - $0 SO $0 ---$0 - - $0 _ $0 , ....s-aa n+ro+rn SSi x KAfeml ~ mwmi amm AgN 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - - Fund: 0010 Map Pro ect: RINEY ROAD PAVING Project Number: 0010-83 Estimated Cost: $100,000 Project Dowiptlon: PROVIDE A 41' BACK TO BACK ST-+'=.ET FROM DONNA DRIVE AT US77 TO THE BEND IN RINEY ROAD. THIS NEEDS TO BE BUILT IN CONJUNCTION WITH TO THE HWY 77 PROJECT BY T_XDO_T, _ Benellts/pwpose; PROVIDE A SAFER ALIGNMENT FOR RINEY ROAO AND ALSO A SAFER INTERSECTION AT US77. Task Schedule (MonthJYear) ~ - Design Bid Construct Completed B innin Date OCT-94 MAR-95 MAY-95 Ending Date: FES-95 APR-95 _ SEP-95 Construction Fundln Schedule $1,000'x) Funding Source Prior 92-•93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds $0 Auth/Unlssued Bonds $0 Aid In Cosst, $0 Other $100 $100 Total $0 $0 $0 _ $100 $0 $0 $100 _ Construction Fun_ dinCost e $1,000's - - v~- Llability Source Prior 92-93 93.94 94-95 95-96 _ 96-97 Total _ Services $17 $17 Land $0 Construction $83 $83 Other _ $0 Total $0 1 $0 $0 $100 $0 $0 $100 _ Operating Bud et Costs $1,000's) Expenditure Type 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-_96-_ 96-97 ~ Total Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund Ooi _ Pro ecU MOCKINGBIRD LANE DRAINAGE Project Number, 0010-54 _ Estimated Cost: _$60,000 Project Descriptlon: REPLACE EXISTING CULVERTS UNDER MOCKINGBIR SOUTH OF MINGO ROAD WITH PROPER SIZED BOX CULVERTS. BenelitsIPurpose: IMPROVE DRAINAGE ON MOCKINGBIRD LANE AS WEL PROVIDE A WIDER CROSSING FOR SAFETY, Task Schedule (MonthtYear) Design - Bid Construct Completed Baginnin hate. OCT-96 JAN-97 MAR-97 ]Ending bate: DEC-9fi FEB-97 JUN-97_ construction Fundln Schedule $1,000A Funding Source Prior _ 92-93 93-94 94-96 95-96 9647 Total $O Existing Bonds $0 AuthlUnlssued Bonds $0 Aid in Const, Other $60 -$60 Total _ $0 a0 $0 $0 $60 $60 in costs $1,000's _ Construction Fund Liabillt~ Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96____--_ 96-97 Total _ ` $10 $i0 Services Land $1 $i $1 $1 $0 Construction $49 $49 Other - - Total $0 $0 - $0 ~0 0 $60 - $60 ,000's _ Operating tau el to $1 Expenditure Typo - - 92-93 93-94 -4-95 95-96 - 96-97 Total -SO Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $_0 Fixed Assets - --lo Total $0 $0 $0 $0 -----$0 t :~iN4.'1t PAX", bow, ~MLFAY Uuv.u0 MMMY'M 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM mmXwoft --0010 8 - umber~-' rMISC, STREET RECONSTRUCT10fV d Costi 0 0 10-85 escrlpilon; STnEE 700 WRGE TO 8E CONSIDERED MAINTENANCESC , F- urpose' " PROVIDE MINOR STRE'FT`RECONSTRUC'TIONS UPON AND EVALUATION, PROJECTS WOULD NORMALLY 13E T00SMALL INDIVIDUALLY. Desl n Task schedule (MnnlhlYearj Be fnnln Date; Bid Construct Pnciln pdtD, OCT-96 JAN-97 Com let©d AUG-97 NO'V-96 SEP-97 OCT-97 Fundln Source` Construction Fundin S-0 -;I-(; Existing Bonds Prlo - 92-93 f$1,000's). AutiVUnfssued Bonds - - 93-94 94-95 _ 95-96 - 9&-97 Aid In Const - Ttai Other - $0 Total $0 a $0 $0 Liabill $owr g Construction Fundln $ o $0 _ $o $250 $250 Servfces Prior 9~-93 OOSis;$1,000 g X260 $250 Land 93-94 _ - 94_9y ` 95-96 Construction 96-97 _ Total Other $42 $42 Total $2 $2 $0 $206 $0 $0 $206 Ex ndafure'- 0 ratin Bud etCo$ts j$1,000's SO ,SQ - _ 250 $0 Personal Services 82-98 _ 93-94 - $260 Supplies x`95 _ _ Maintenance 95-ss 96-97 Total Services '~-$U Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 - $0 J ati . p{*aysyi .eAtxiY f'aw!'F'3 F1 WI1d+7 r~ti YtuRNl I.tY:R21 v - ....pr.w aurv, ,.:N+t'±f.cNNM+f 1'E~I(!La 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund _ Ma 0010 _ _ Pra ot: MISC. STREET_RECONST_ RUCTION Project Number: 0010-85 Estimated Cost: $260,000 Project Description; PROVIDE FOR SMALL MISC STREET RECONSTRUCTI THAT ARE TOO LARGE TO BE CONSIDERED MAINTENANCE. Donal itslPurpose: ; PROVIDE MINOR STREET flECONSTRI. IONS UPON REQUEST AND EVALUATION, PROJECTS WOULD NORMALLY BE TOO SMALL CONSIDER INDIVIDUALLY. Task Schedule (Month/Year) 0e31 n_ Bld Construct Completed Beginning Date;` 0 CT-96 JAN-97 _ NOV-96 AUG-97 SEP-97 OCT-97 _ trndln Date: Construction Fundln Sohedule $1,000's - - Funding Source Prior ~ 92-93 _ 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97_ Total $0 Existing Bonds $0 f Auth/UnIssued . Bonds - $0 I! Aid ld In onst $260 -$250 Other C Other Total $0 $0 $0 - 260 _§2 Goristruction Fundin Casts $1,000's Llabill SOUfCH< Prior 92-93 - 93-94 94-95 95-96 - 96-97 Total - $Q2 $42 Services .2 $2 $2 Land $2$2 $2 Construction _ 06 Other - - Total $0 SO $0 $0 T $0 $250 - $260 p ratio Bud et Costa $1,000_ - E>< nditure T 92-93 93-94 94-95 96-96 96-97 Total $O Personal Services $0 SUPplle3 $0 Maintenance $o Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $ Fixed Assets - " - _$o :---$0 $0 ~0 ----$o -----$a Total - 1993--97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0010 Pro got: MISC_SIDEWA_L_K REPAIR Project Number: 0010-86 Estimated Cost: $100,000 Project Description: REPLACEMENT AND MAJOR REPAIR OF EXISTING SIDEWALK WHERE NEEDED. BonefitslPurpose: REPAIR OR REPLACE UNSAFE STRETCHES OF EXISTI SIDEWALK THROUGHOUT THE CITY. Task Schedule (Month/Year) - Desi n Bid__ Construct Completed Beglnnin Dale: 10C -96 JAN-97 MAR-97 Ending Date: DEC-96 FEB-97 JUN-97 _ Construction Funding Schedule ($1,000's) Fundln Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95_ 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds $0 AuthlUnlssued Bonds $0 Aid In Cosst, $0 Other $100 $100 Total $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 $100 $100 Ganstruotlon Fundin Costs Liability Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 9647 Total Services $5 -$5 Land $0 Construction $95 $95 Other $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $100 $100 Operating Bud et Costs 51,000's Ex ndime Typo 92-93~ 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 --Total__ u~ Personal Services Supplies $0 Maintenance `s Services Debt Service Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 $0 ~0 $0 $0 $0 ,..,w..v-r+ .::.w.en rxuaroa k0s"n oval-?I A' +i41 kAW" k4aMq None) 17969! w n"" t 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0010 - - - - - - Pro cc MISC TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS Mme` Project Number: 0010-87 - Eallrnated Cast. $162. 0 -00 - - _ _ _ Project Deacrip, on: PROVIDE TRAFF_IC CONTROL_ SIGNAL_S AT TWO INTERSECTIONS TO BE DETERMINED IN THE PROJECT YEAR. '6ene-fit PUrpose: PROVIDE SIGNALIZAT ION AT NTERSECTIONS - ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS, Task Schedule (MonthlYear) _ Desl n Bld Construct Completed Beginning Date: OC-9fi FEB-97 - APR-97- - Ending Date. AN-97 [MAR-07--T UN-97 Construction Funding Schedule ($1,000's) Funding Source ` Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 9_5-96 96-97 - Total - Exlsting Bonds - - - - 0 AuthJUnissued Bonds $0 Aid in Cosst, $0 Other $182 $182 'Total - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $182 $182 Construction; FundIn Costs $1,000's Llablll Source_ Prim 92-93 93-94 94-95 - 95-96 96-97_ Total Services - $30 -$30 Land Construction $2 $2 ^ $160 $150 Other $0 Total $0 _$0 SO $0 $0 $182 $182 Operating Bud et Costs 51,000'x) Ex nditure T - 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-86 96-97 Total Personal Services - - $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Flxod Assets $0 Total $0- - $0- ---$0 $0 $0 $0 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund; 0010 _ _ CMgP Pro c WEST WINDSOR DRIVE PAVING Project Number: 0010-88 Estimated Cost $400,000-_ - ProJact iiascrlptlo-w EXPAND EXISTING WINDSOR_ _TO 4_LANES FROM HON BRAE TO THE RECREATION CENTER AND WIDEN THE 2-LANE SECTION FRO TO HINKLE. 6nsfltslPUrposa: PROVIDE BETTER AND SAFER ACCESS TO NORTH LA PARK AND THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS, Task Schedule (MonthlYear) _ Dest n Bid Construct Comploted [EN-Inning Date: OCT-96 MAR-97 MAY-97 _ Endin Date; FEB-97 APR-97 SEP-97__ - Gonstructicn Fundin Schedule ($11000's) _ Fundln Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds $0 Auth/Unissued Bonds $0 Ald in Cons[, $0 Other _ $400 $400_ Total $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $400-$400 Construction Fundin Costs $1,U00's _ Ugbilit SOtkrCe Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96~ _ 96-97 Total Services $68 $68 Land $0 Construction $332 $332 Other $0 Total - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400 -u $400 _ 0 eratin Bu et Costs $1,000's Ex nditure,Type 92-93 _ 93-94- 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Personal Services _0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets _ $0 Total - INR~P! t:~s'.h kt~e4~i N+AIY'1J A7~!<Q Kepi ~g7RW! 111lfeM 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund:_- 0010 _ Ma _ Project: PAYNE DRIVE PAVING AND DRAINAGE Project Number: 0010-89 Estimated Cost: _ $240,000 Project Description: CONSTRUCT A 24' WIDE STR_EET_WITH_CURS AND G_U BETWEEN WESTGATE DRIVE AND 1-35. RIGHT OF WAY TO BE DONATED. RenWfits/PUrpoS.' PROVIDE BETTER ACCESS IN AND OUT OF WESTGAT AREA. Task Schedule (Month/Year) Desi n Bid _ Construct Completed BeOinning Datel OCT-96 FEB-97 APR-97 lcndln Date; JAN-97 MAR-97 - OCT-97 Construction Fundln Schedule ($1,000'x) Funding SOUfCP v Prior 92-93 _ 93-94 - 94-95 _ 95-96 96-97 Total $0 Existing Bonds Auth/UnIssued Bonds $0 Ald in Const, $0 Other $240 _ $240 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ---$240 $240 Construction Fundln Costs $1,000's _ LIbHi_Source - Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Services 4 y $24 $24 Land $0 Construction $216 $216 Other _ $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $O $240 $240 Operating Bud et costs ($1.000's) Ex ndltwe Type. 92-93 _ 93-94 94-95 95-96 96_97_ - Total Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total - $0 so $0 - - $0 - - -$0 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0010 Pro ct: MOCKINGBIRD LANE CONNECTION Project Number: 0010-90 _ v Estimated Cost: $169,000 Protect Description: CONSTRUCT A CURVED CONNECTION ON MO_CKINGB LANE AT PAISLEY REPLACING THE EXISTING DOG LEG. RIGHT OF WAY HAS ALREADY BEEN ACQUIRED. Ranefits/Purpose: PROVIDE SAFER INTERSECTIONS AT MOCKINGBIRD AND PAISLEY STREETS. Task Schedule (MonthlYear) Design BId_ Construct Compleled Ra Innln Date: OCT-96 FEB-97 APR-97 Ending Date. JAN-97 MAR-97 AUQ-97 Construction Fundin . Schedule ($1,000's) _ FundingSodree Prior _ 92-93 93-94 94-95~ 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds M - - - $0 Auth/Unlssued Bonds $0 Aid In Const, $0 Other $159 $159 Total $0 $0 $0 T$0 _ $0 $159 $159 _ Constructlon Funding Costs $1,000 1, ablll source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 _ 96-97 Total Services $23 $23 Land $0 Construction $136 $136 Other $0 Total Y $0 $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $159 $159 _ 0 eratln Dud et costs $1,000'6 - - - - S>< ndltureTy~e 92-93 93_-94 94-95 96-96 96-97 Total - Personal Services - - - - $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 $0 - - $0 - $0 - $p $o , 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund~ Project; SEQUOIA PARK DRAINAGE Project Number; 0810-12 Estimated cost; $1,041,000 - - Pro*t 0esorlptlon; INSTALL STORM SEWER SYSTEM IN SEQUOIA PARK SUBDIVISION, SYSTEM WILL INCLUDE A COMBINATION OF UNDERGROUND AND CONCRETE CHANNEL. SenefllsfPurpoe. SOLVE SEVERE STREET FLOODING PA6- 6- IN THE SEQUOIA PARK SUBDIVISION. THERE ARE NO KNOWN ACCOUNTS OF WATE HOMES. Task Schedule (Month/Year) Design _ Bid Construct Completed Be I~nnin Date, OCY-96 MAR-97 MAY-9_7 W- _ Ending Date; FEB-97 APR-97 FE8-98 - Construction Funding Schedule $1,000'x) - - Funding Source Prior 92-93 ~93-94 94-95 95-J6 96-97 Total Existing Bonds - - ----$0 AutIUUnlssued Bonds $0 Aid in Cosst, $0 Other $1,041 $1,04_1 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,041 $1,041 - - Construction FundIn Costs Llabiti $our" Prior 92-93 93-94 94.96 95-96 ~96-97 Total _ Services $93 $93 Land $11 $11 Construction $937 $937 Other $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,041 - $1,041 _ Operating Budget Costs $1,004's EX nditure T 92-93 93-94 94-95 96-9G 96-97 Total _ Personal Services SO Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 $0 -------$0- $0 $0. 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund.. C.LP. Pro t. THUNDERBIRD DRAINAGE Ca Pro at Number: 0810-13 - Estimated Cast $6a,ooo _ _ _ _I Project Powiptlon: INSTALL STORM DRAIN SYSTEM UNDER THUNDERD_ NEW SYSTEM WILL TIE INTO EXISTING WESTGATE HEIGHTS SYSTEM, Benetlts/Putpose: ;SOLVE LOCAL FLOODING PROBLEM, WATER IS KNO TO ENTER AT LEAST ONE HOME, Task Schedule (Moolh/Year) Des! n Bid Construct Completed Beginning D4W,- JAN-97 [APR-97 JUN-97 ndin Date, MAR-97 MAY-97 AUG-97 Construction Fundin' Schedule $1,000's) _ Pundin Source Prior 92-93 v 93-94 94-95 _ 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds - $0 AuttdUnlssued Bonds $0 Aid {n Cosst. $0 Other $84 _ $__8.4 Total $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $0 _ $84 $84 Construction Fundin Costs ($1.000's) _ Uablllt Some Prior 92-93- 98-94 94-96 95-96 96-97 Total Services - $8 $a Land $1 $1 Construction $75 $76 Other $0 Total - $0 $0 $0 $0 $94 T--- - $84 _ O eratin Bu at Costs $1,000'6 -93 93-94 94-96 95-96 T 96-97 Total Ex ndture Typo 92 Personal Services - - `--_`$0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total .....m.. ..,...,..raw~e xix.xwr.'f?n111Aq F,T41MI 1 A ICJ f) IANN Iit4Rti'•! "W4 MMI" r 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - Fund: C.LP. Maw Pro ot: DANIELSlFT, WORTH DRIVE DRAINAGE , Pra ect Number 0810-14 ~Btlmated Cost: $330,000 Project Description: INSTALL CONCRETE BOTTOM CHANNEL WITH GRASS SLOPES BETWEEN FT. WORTH DRIVE AND ACME BRICK. INCLUDES DUAL 8' BOX CULVERTS AT DANIELS STREET. _ BenefltWPurpose:~ SOLVE LOCAL FLOODING PROBLEM. Task Schedule (Month/Year) Design Bid Construct Completed Beginning Date: OCT-96 FEB-97 APR-97 Ending Date: JAN-97 MAR-97 JUL-97- construction Fundln Schedule[$1 000's) Funding Source Prior 92-93 93-9_4 _ 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total _ Existing Bonds _ $0 Auth/Unissued Bonds $0 Aid In Const. $0 Other $3_30 $330 Total Y $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 _ $330_ $330 Construction FuOn Costs Wablli Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 _ 95-96 96-97 Total' Servlces - $29 $29 Land $11 $11 Construction $290 $290 Other $0 Total _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $330 $330 Operating Bud et Costs $1,000,6 E>< ncilture Typo 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 - Total _ Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund; C.LP. Ma - Pro ct: CORBIN ROAD BRIDGE - pro JeGt Number; 0810-is - E9tlmated Cost $1,002,750 _ Pto*t Description: PROVIDE TWO LANE BRIDGE WITH SIDEWALK OVER DRY FORK HICKORY CREEK AT CORBIN ROAD TO PASS 100 YEAR FLO 6Hne11t81PWPgSd; "REPLACE EXISTING LOW WATER CROSSING WITH A BRIDGE SPANNING THE DESIGN FLOOD (100 YEAR). Task Schedule (MonthlYear) _ Design Bld Construct Completad He Innin Date; OCT-96 i JUN-97_ SEPW_97 ndln9 Dated- MAY-97 JUL-97 FEB 98 Construction Schedule $1,000'x) Funding Source Prior 92-93 4-95 Total Existing Ponds $0 AuthNnIssued Bonds $0 Aid In Const, $0 Other $1,003 $1,003 Total $0 $0 $q - - $0 $1,003 - $1,003 ConstructTlonnoln Conte $1,000's - - 7Construcilon Source Prior 92-93 94 94-95 95--96 96-97 Total_ _ --$150 $i50 $20 $20 $833 $833 er $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,003 $1,003 Operating Butl et Costs ($1,t04'T1115-16 -Typo Ex ndlture 92-93 _ 93-94 94-996-97 Total Personal Services - $0 Supplies Maintenance $O Services $0 Debt Service $0 $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 $0 _fl.-_ $0 $0 win . ..«„.+.,.•s im„ i;xw-•:a itK94V:$ m7AAT',' 6Yin`CAi iN%.~~SS !i1!$.U'8 IKti'4~7 ftigl9=i IlWtftlM 7 MP6~y[Y 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: C.I.P Pro eat: FT. WORTH DRIVE DRAINAGE Pro ct Number. 0810-17 _ - Estimated Cost; $537,000 _ _ ProJac! 0880ption: PROVIDE UNDERGROUND DRA_INAGE AND OPEN CHANNEL EAST OF FT. WORTH DRIVE SOUTH OF MASSEY, TO JAMES ST. BenefitslPurposw COMPLIMENT JAMES ST. PROJECT AND REDUCE DRAINAGE PROBLEMS. Task Schedule (MonthlYear) Design Bld Construct Completed Beginning APR-97 JUN-07 [Ending Dole: MAY 97-__ SEP-97 Constructlon Fundln Schedule ($1,000'$) Fundin Source Priur 92-93 93-94 94-95 - 95_96 - 9& 97 J Total Existing Bonds -SO Auth/Unlssued Bonds $0 Aid In Const $0 Other-Unauthorized $537 _$537 Total $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $537 $537 _ Construction Fundtn Cosis $t,000's Cost Source Prlor 92-93 93-94 94-9.5 95-96 96-97 v Tolaiu Services $0 Land $0 Construction $537 $537 Other _$0 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $537 $537 _ Operating Bud et Costs 51,000's Sx ndlture Type 92-93 9394 94-•95 95-96 96-97~ Total _ Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0~ $0 $0 _$0 $0 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund; C,I.P - Ma Pr0 tt RANCH ESTATES DF,AINAGE Estimated Cost: $664,000 Project Desoriction, CONCRETE BOTTOM CHANNEL FROM HAMPTON DR. TO HWY 380 WITH UNDERGROUND SYSTEM AND LARIAT RD. CROSSOVER. Heneflis/Purposel WILL SOLVE A LOCALIZED FLOODING PROBLEM AND REMOVE SEVERAL HOMES FROM THE FLOODPLAIN. Task Schedule (Month/Yoor) Des_iq_n Bld Construct Completed Beginning pater _ APR-97 JUN-97 Sndin Date; MAY-97 SEP-97 Construction Fundln Schedule Fundln Source: Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds - $0 AulhlUnissued Bonds $0 Aid In Const, $0 Other-Unauthorized _ $664 $6_64 Total - $0 $0 _$0 - $0 -$0 _$664 $664 - Construction Fundin Costs $1,000'x) _ Cost Sourco Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 96-96 96-97 Total Services - - $0 Land $0 Construction $664 $664 Other $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $664 - $6- Operating Bud Ot Costs $1,000'$ Expenditure To 92-93 _ 93-94 94-95 95-96 _ 96-97_ Total Personal Services Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 $0 - $$0 b/ \ mar:, ,„vnn ,xwww! ssrau,; Nt1 f ;1 CYAY+ii - . ;aE a'A.~,%i lQ!&I {fit 5RiW44 fkT/SM1F9 flYrClb ftiI11gM~ 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - - - - _ _CgITSTREETDRAINAGE [Mai-- rLON C.I,P mber; T 0810-19 Estim led Cost: st' - scrlptlon: PID E AN UNDERGROUN- - D DRAIN _ AGE SYSTEM OIT P- INATE HIGH WATER 1,rkij POTENCIAL HOUSE AND YARD FLOODING. Task Schedule (Month/yearj Design Bfd Construct Com fete ed Be In~ing gate; AP Endl bat- g APR-97 JUN-97 MAY-97 _ SEP-97-~ _ Construction Fun din Schedule $1,000's) Fundln Source Prior - 92-93 - 93-94 94-95 95-96 _ Existing Bonds J_19(6~ 7 Total Auth/Unissued Bonds $0 Ald In Const. $0 Other-Unauthorized $0 dotal $0_ $480 $460 Construction Lo- Costa $1,0006 $460 $480 Cost &i uroe Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 Services 95-96 - 96-97 Total Land - - - $0 Construction $0 Other $480 $480 Tote! $0 $0 0 $0 $o $480 $480 Operating Bud et Cosls-$1,000's - - Ex nditure Type 9293 93-94 94-95 - Personal Services - - 95-96 96-97 Total Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total _ $0 S•0 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM rn C.LP HOUSTON PLAOE/SENA DRAINAGE ber; 08 10-20 Ast; $447,000 iptioCONSTRUCT DRINAGE SYSTEM ER SCRIURE, RADLEY M. TO TIE INTO SYSTEM AT GOBER. asa; ~ ~ REDUCE OR ELIMINATE WATER UNDER HOMES ING OF YARDS. Task Schedule (MonttifYear) Des! n_ Bfd _ Construct Completed 13 Innin vale, APR-97 JUN-977 Fndin 'Date; MAY-97 SEP-97 Construction FUndln Schodule$1,000's) _ Funding Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 - Total Existing Bonds - - _ AutlVUnlssued Bonds -$0 Aid In Cosst $p Other-Unauthorized $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $U $4_47 $447 Construction Fundin Costa 1,0 Is - $O -x447 _ _$447 Cost scarce Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 L 7 J otal ervices _ Land - $0 Constructlon $0 Other $447 Total $O SO $U _ $0 - $0 - $0 $447 0~ratin Bud el CostsS1,000's - - Bx ndil ure T 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 - 96-97 Total - Personal Services - Supplies - $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total - - - $0 - _ $0 _ _ , _ ...w.. ..raut sezK'" ,rAwpn nNffN'S 5ss,g;Fa G'OI'ei 4y 4211DYeU ALIYAYaa YdlTGrtl I1 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund, C.I.P _ Ma Prowl: Proct Number; 0810-22 Estimated Costa - 5162000 _ _ _ _ AroJ001 pesCrlpllon, CONSTRUCT PIPE AND INLETS ACROSS FROM TWu GOLF COURSE ON HIGHLAND PARK RD, senaflts/Purpose: REDUCE OR ELIMINATE FLOODING OF HIGHLAND PARK ROAD. Task Schedule (MontW/ O- j _ Design Bid Construct - Completed He innin Date; MAY-92 finding Date, JUN-92 Construction Fundln Schedule 1 000'x) _ _ _ Fundln Soures.~ Prior - 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 _ Total _ Existing Bonds $0 Auth/Unissued Bonds $0 Aid In Const. $0 Other-Unauthorized $162 _ $162 Total $0 $162 $0 $0 50 T $0 $162 Construction Fundln Costs $1,00_0's~ cost source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96- 96-97 Total Services - - - -$0 Land $0 Construction $162 $162 Other __$0_ Total $0 $162 $0 $0 $0 $0 $162 - O~erating bud of Costs $1,000'x)_ Ex nditure Type 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1993--97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund; C I,P Prp ect; E. HICKORY ST. DRAINAGE Project Number; 0810-23 - - - Estimated Cost; $143,000 Ptojw Description; PROVIDE AN UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE SYSTEM FUR HICKORY ST. FROM PECAN TO WOOD ST. AND EXTENSIONS TO BRADSHAW AND CRAWFORD ST. DenetitslPurposa, ELIMINATE LOCAL FLOODING_ AND DRAINAGE PROBLEMS, Task Schedule (Mooth/Year) _ Design - Enid Construct_ Comulotod E MAY-94. jEndin2 Date; JUN-94 E- Construction Funding Schedule $1,000's _l - Funding Source Prior 92-93-~_ 93-94 94-95 95-96 96•-97 Tota_ _ Existing Bonds - - - $0 Auth/Unissued Bonds $0 Aid In Const, $0 Other-Unauthorized $143 _$143 Total - $0 $0 $143 $0 $143 Construction Funding Gosts $1,000 s _ _ r Cost Source Prlor 92-93 - 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Services - - - $0 Land $0 Construction $143 $143 Other $0 Total $0 $0 $143 - - $0 $0 $0 ----$143 Operating Bud $ 1000, Ex rldlture T 92-93 93-94 _ 94-95 _ 95-96 96-97 Total Personal Services - $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets Total ~itppks '=t„Hiq iiairY.6'•( ~{)K.{f.5', 4ti1g."~ MiW1D110i~~ .n-AYMI'lII1f1Af JNNSLS r.wn• . ax..{„ u'diVll}4 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: C.I. P - - Project, S. RUDDELL ST. DRAINAGE Project Number. 0810-24 Estimated Cost $252,000 PrOjeCt QeBCrlpSlon: PROVIDE UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE ON RUDDELL FROM HICKORY TO WILSON ST. AND MODIFY BRIDGE, Benefits/Purpose; RELIEVE DRAINAGE PROBLEMS AROUND THE PHOENIX APTS. Task Schedule (MonthlYeao Design Bid Construct Completed - Beglnning Dater MAY-95 - Bnding Dater'-_.,_- JUN-95 Construction Fundin Schedule ($1,000's) - Funding Source Prior 92-9393-94_ 94-95 - 95-96 96-97 Total $0 Existing Bonds $0 Auth/Unissued Bonds $0 Aid in Const. $252 $252 Other-Unauthorized Total _ $0 $0 _ $0 S2b2 $0 $0 $252 Constructlon Fundin Costs $1,000's Cost Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 ---96-97 _ 'Total _ $0 Services $0 Land $262 $252 Construction $0 Other - - $0 $0 $0 $252 $0 $0 25 Total _ - - _ 0 ratin Bud t Costs S$1,000's) Ex nditure T Ype 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 - 9-97 Total $0 Perconal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets - - - - - _$0 --$0 - - - $ - Total f.~ 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: --ci.P Pro Ce PECAN CREEKK - RIJDDELL TO WOOD ROW s__-- - ProaclNumber; os10-2s EsomatedCost; Pr01e00 oorlptlon; CONSTRUCTA CONCRETE BOTTOM IN CREEK- SMEEN RUDDELL AND WOODROW AND ENLARGE CHANNEL, Sene6tsftrpose; CREATE AN ADEQUATELY SSIZED C NAH NEL TO REDUCE WATER BACKUP AND FLOODING. Took Schedule (Monthl/Year} ` S innin Data; Deaf n Bid Construct Com letod t;1, Date; _ MAY-9a - JUN-94 Fundfn Source Constructlon Fundln Schedule $1,000's) Prior 92-93 93-94 _ _ Existing Bonds 94-95'~ 9b-96 96-97- Auth/Unlssued Bonds Total Aid in Const, $0 Other-Unauthorized $0 Total $0 $1,165 $0 $0 $1,185 $0 $0 - s $1,185 Cost &oUfCe - Construction Ftlndf Costs $ ----$0 $1,185 Prior 92-93 93_94 1,_000S Services - 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total_ Land _ - - Construction $0 Other $11185 $0 Total $1,185 $0 SO $1,185 $0 _ ---so - $0 4 rstlnQ Bud 8t GOS1S *1,000's- $0 51,185 Ex nditure T ` 92-93 _ Personal Services 93-94 94-95 95-96 - Supplie8 96-97` Total Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 - $0 $0 $0 v... ..r.+.,. ..v:. „µ•r+r snmwi neAxmy MHUN.N IwRAKfI P!ihR#N, {tA7J[KY ttvwwq MOW $r*wq 1 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Prp act: OAKLAND STREET DRAINAGE Project Number 0810-26 --V _ -~-W Estimated Cost: $907,000 Pro)oct Description: PROVIDE UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE ON OAKLAND FROM LOCUST TO PECAN SOUTH OF WITHERS. Sonetit¢IFurposs: ELIMINATE DRAINAGE PROBLEMS ALONG OAKLAND TO PECAN. Task Schedule (Month/Year) _ Design 81d _ Construct Completed 8e Innin Date: T- APR-97 JUN-97 _ Endin Dale:' - MAY-97 SEP-97 Construction Fundin Schedule !Funding Source Prior 92-_93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97_ Total Existing Bonds $0 Auth/Unissued Bonds $0 Aid In Const. $0 Other-Unauthorized _ _$907 $907 Total _ $0 $0 $0 $0 _ $0 $907 T ---$907 _ Construction Fundin Costs $1,000'9 _ _ _ - Com Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Services $0 Land $0 Constructlon $907 $907 Other $0 Total $0 _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $907 $907 O ralin Budget Costs $1,000'6 Expenditure Type 92-93 _ 93-94 94-96 95-96 96-97 _ Total Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund, _C.i.P - - - -•-------------------L~ Project: - NORTHRIDGE DRAINAGE Project Number: 0810-27 Estimated Cost: $234,000 _ _ _ _ pro}eat pesarlption: PROVIDE UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE FROM HWY 377 AND WINDSOR TO CARROLL AND NORTHRIDG,E. EAST TO BOLIVAR. Seneflts/Pufpuse: ELIMINATE LOCAL FLOODING AND ENHANCE BOLIVAR PROJECT COMPLETED IN 1989. Task Schedule (Month/Year) - _ Desi n Bid Construct Completed Innin Date: APR-97 JUN-97 - Fen An ' pate: ~~AY-97 SEP-97 - Construction Fundrn Schedule 51,000's) Fundin Sou roe Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 86-97 Total Existing Bonds $0 AuthlUnlasued Bonds $0 Aid In Const. $0 Other-Unauthorized - $234 $_234 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 _$0 $234 $234 _ Construction Fundin Costs 51,040'x} r CQst Source Prior - 92-93 93-94 94-96 95-96 96-97 _ Total Services _ $0 Land $0 Construction $234 $234 Other $0 Total $0 - $0 $0 $0 $234 $234 0 ratln Bud Let costs $1,400's EX ndlture T 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total- Personal Services - T $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 $0 $0 ...i.w. <.+n.w u+r¢.sn ,ueneaa ps!lu5d wMAUI RGi3~7 RNAGA M7+.{1{W.{ 14~iFt2 t!M11WJ { F~9 IV~N 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund; C.I.P - Ma Pro t: STRICKLAND JUNIOR HIGH Project Number: 0810-28 - - - Estimated Cost: $79,0_00 _ Project Description: CONSTRUCT A PIPE AND CONCRETE CHANNEL FROM STRICKLAND TO NORTH SIDE OF WINDSOR DR. Benefits/Purpose; PROVIDE ADEQUATE SITE DRAINAGE AND REDUCE MAINTENANCE, Task Schedule (Month/Year) Design Bid Construct Com.pleted Beginning Date: APR-97 JUN-97 - r End n Date: MAY-97 SEP-97 _ Construction Funding Soho ole ($1,000's Funding Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 _ Total _ Existing Bonds $0 Auth/Unissued Bonds $0 Aid In Const. $0 Other-Unauthorized $79 $79 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7 - $79_ Constructlon FundinCost e $1,000's ,0 cost Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Services $0 Land $0 Construction $79 $79 Other $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $ 879 Q erating Bu et Costs' $1,000's _ Ex ndlture T e 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Personal Services - - - $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets _ $0 Total --'$0 _--$0 -----$0 $9 $0 $0 ✓'1 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Pd:i ct; GOOD S AMARITAN VILLAGE Ma 0Number,0810-29 ated Cost; $351,000ct Description; CONSTRUCT AN_UNDERGROUND PIPE SYSTEM RE CURRENT DRAINAGE CHANNEL EXISTS. Ben9lltslPurpose: ELIMINATE AN UNSIGNLY ACCUMULATION OF MUD, DEBRIS, WEEDS, AND STANDING WATER. Task Schedule (MontttlYear} Desi n Bid Construct Completed nn#nDate; APR-97 UN--PEnaiin 'Date; MAY-97 SE P-97 _ Construction Fundin -8chedule$1,000"s _ r1n Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-96 95-96 Y 96-97 Total Bonds - _ $0 ssued Bonds nst, $0 Other-Unauthorized _$0 _ $351 $351 Total $0 0 $0 $0 $0 $351_ ----$351 ConstrMFu"dfn _ cost'$01000 Prior 92-93 5-96 96-97 Total Services - - Land $0 Construction $0 $351 $361 Other _ $0 Total _^$0 _ $351 Personal Services $0 0 7$0io$l f""ndltur~ a 92-95-96 96-97 Tolai Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debl Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 70181 $0 $0 $0 (:Y:Y,a'i) kYlAl( P2fpcdi7 W.xegeei k#U t-. iuuwr. 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund ooio Prq t; GOOD SAMARITAN VILLAGE ORglNAGE Pro CI Number: 0810-298 - ~r^a~-- estlmated cost,, 5222,000 _ PrP*l Aascriptlgn; CONSTRUCT AN UNDERGROUND PIPE SYSTEM WHERE CURRENT DRAINAGE CHANNEL EXISTS, THIS IS A DEVIATION FROM THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL IN THAT THERE IS LESS BOX CULVERT._ 8anelftslAUrpose: ELIMINATE AN UNSIGHTLY ACCUMULATION OF MUD, DEBRIS, WEEDS AND STANDING WATER. - Task Schodule.(MdnthlYear) Des, n Btd_ Construct Completed Baglnnl~ rl_ gg~ APR 97 Endln pate; JUN-97 MAY-97 SEP-97 Fundln Source Construclion Fundln Schedule $1,000's) Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 Existing Bonds _ 95-9fii~ gg_97 Total Auth/Unlssued Bonds Aid In Cosst, $0 Other $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $222 $222 or Construction Fundin Costs $1,000's __$222 _`$p`P2 Llablfi Source` Prior 92-93 _ Services 93-94 94-95 95-9fi - 9fi-97 Total _ Land $32 532 Construction Other $190 $0 Total $0 $190 $0 $0 $0 - - $0 Q ratln dud et costs' $1,000's - ~0 $222 $222 Ex ndlture ? 92-93 _ Personal Services 93-94 _ 94-95 95-96 _ _ 96-97 Totat Supplies $0 Maintenance Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total _ $0 - - $0 - _ - ----$0 - $o 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund; C.I.P. Project: EVERS PARKWAY DRAINAGE Pro ct Number, 0810-30 Estimated Cost: $17,000 Pr - )w DoWiptiont CONSTRUCT A CONCRETE-LINED CHANNEL FROM- EVERS PKWY TO N, LOCUST. Renetits1Purpose, ELIMINATE ACCUMULATIONS OF MUD, DEBRIS, AND STANDING WATER. WOULD NOT ELIMINATE VERMIN FROM ADJACENT VACANT LAND, _ Task Schedule (Month/Year) _ Design Bid Construct Completed B9 innin Date, APR-97 JUN-97 f~ndin Date; MAY-97 SEP-97 - Construction Fundin Schedule ($1,000's _ 6-97 Total_ Fundin Source Prior _ 92-93 - 93-94 _ 94-95 _ 95-96 9647- Existing Bonds $0 Auth/Unissued Bonds $0 Aid In Const, $0 Other-Unaulhorized $17 $17 Total $0 $O $0 $0 SO - $17 $17 Construction FundingCost s $1,000's _ 6081 Souroe Prior _ 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Services, $0 Land $0 Construction $17 $17 Other $0 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 ----$0 $17 $117 Operating Budget Casts $t,000's) _ Ex ndifure Type _ 92-93 93-94 94-96 95-96 06-97 Total _ Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 $0 ---50 ----$0 $0 $0 V/ 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM RrO C _ SHAD Y OAKS DAAINAGEt Number; -0810-31 ted Coil; - $565000 - - LCONCA'EETE ion; CONSTRUCTUN DERGROUND DRAINAGE AND ANNEL FROM DALLAS DR. TO DUNCAN ST. WITH PIPES MIT H STS. AND INLETS. e REDUCE DRAINAGE PROBLE_MS GS DRAINAGE PROJECT ALREADY UNDERWAY. Task Schedule (MonthlYear y - _ Desi n Bid_ Construct Completed LC a Innin Dale APR-97 JUN-97 ndln pate; MAY-97 SEP-97 ~ Construction Fundin Schedule $1,090's) Fundln Sourc Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 L09~6-97 Total Existing Bonds - AutlVUnlssued Bonds $0 Aid In Const. $0 Other-Unauthorized $0 Total $0 - $565 - -_$665 $0 $0 $0 $0 $566 $565 Construrtlgn Funding Cps16 51,00016 - - 04 Sourr;a Prior 92-93 93-94 '94-95 95-96 96-97 Total _ Services Land $0 Construction $0 Other $656 $665 Total Y- $0 --_$0 $_0 - $0 SO $0 $565 $565 O ratln-su etCosts $1,000's - ~x ndilure T - 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 T9t 97~ Total'-- Personal Services Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insuranco $0 Fixed Assets $0 - - $0 $0 so _$01 arixWi9 nW'IWWV 6k A p''osea.' ,a.*w vYtVtlK! OWN 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fundy C.I.P. Project: SHADY OAKS DRAINAGE pro Bat Number; 0810-31 Estimated Cost: $56_5,000 Rroleot uescflpt I on; CONSTRUCT UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE AND CONCRETE CHANNEL FROM DALLAS DR. TO DUNCAN ST, WITH PIPES TO HILL AND SMITH STS. AN_D INLETS. _ - -Benefits/Purpose: " `REDUCE DRAINAGE PROBLEMS AND ENHANCE WILLOW SPRINGS DRAINAGE PROJECT ALREADY UNDERWAY. - Task Schedule {Month/Yaarj Design laid Construct Complolod Beginning Date; APR 97 JUN-97 Endln Date; MAY-97 SEP-97 _ Construptlon Fundin Schedule ($1,000's cerior 92-93 3-94 4-9595 96 96-97 Total $a $0 s d Bonds $0 $565 5665 r1rnConst. horized $0 _$0 $0 $0 50 -5 - $665 Construction Fundin Casts $1,000's Prior 92-93 93-94 _ 94-95 95-96~ 96-97 Total $O $0 $565 $666 rd $0 $0 $0 $O $0 $0 $665 q ratln By et Costs $1,000'6 nditur~e T 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Bx $o Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets - - - - $a - 50 $a - -$0 50 $0 - - Totaf 'fir ...Ir~~ ~ ~ 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: C.I.P. Project: _ ECTOR STREET DRAINAGE- Pro ect Number: 0810-32 _ $611,000 _ _ _ Estimated Cost: Protect Desoriptlon: PROVIDE UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE FROM PANHANDLE TO EXISTING CHANNEL ON UNIVERSITY DR. Benefits/Purpose; RELIEVE LOCALIZED FLOODING. Task Schedule (Month/Year) _ Design Bid Construct ~Completed Beginning Date: APR-97 ~ JUN-97 T Ending Date: _ MAY-97 SEP-97 - Construction Fundln 'Scheduia~$1,000's) Funding Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 _ Total Existing Bonds $0 AuttVUnissued Bonds $0 Aid in Const. $0 Other-Unauthorized _ $611 $611 Total $o $0 ___$0 $0 $611 $611 Construction Fundin Costs $1,000'6 _ • Cost SOUrce Prior - 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Services $0 Land $0 Construction $611 $611 Other $0 Total $0 $0 $0 _ _ $0 $0 $611 - $611 0 ratln Budget Costs $1,000's Ex Ilditure T e J 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-90 96-97 Total Personal Services _ - ~ $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets Total $0 $0 -$0 v- $0 $0 $0 .o...' ! kltlA7y HNWi ~4'ry FwMwx 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund. - - CJ. P. Funds T----- _ pro L' -Construct Norlh Holding Apron r0 601 Number F6tlmated Cpsf--- 85,300 W Pr0*1 gescrlption; Construct North Holding Apron r - 90% Federal Funding 10% City Fundln`- BenefitstPurpese, To Improve the Economic Development o! the Denton Municipal Airport. Task Schedule (Month/Year) _ Desl2n - Bid Construct Com Toted 8g Innin Date: 1993 1993 1993 Sndin Date; 1993 1993 1993 1993 Construction Fund_I `903 FundinQsource Prfor _ 92-93 $1A00s) - Existing Bonds - 9394 94-95 - 95- ----9 6-97 Total Auth/Unlssued Bonds $0 Aid In Const, $86 $0 Other C.O,'s $9 $66 Total - $0 $95 $9 _$0 $0 $0 $95 _ Construciton Fund-In Costs $1,0 -0's - - 1 , Source Prior 92-9393-94 94-95 ~Services $.1 95-96 _ 96-97 Total _ (Land 4 1 $14 Construction $81 $0 Other $81 Total - -$0 $0 - $0 - $9,i _ $95 O ratio Sud etCasls 51,400's Ex nditure T 92-•93 93-94 94-95- 9.5-96 - Personal Services - g6 96-97_ -Total Supplies - $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total _ - $0 $0 - - - --$0- $o took" h...w u,...,.1 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund; _ C,1.P. Funds ..-_..~Ma~ Project: _ Construct North Holding Apron - - - Pro ct Number: 001906 Estimated Cast; $95,300 _ - pcujoct pescrlp}iQn: Construct North Holding Apron 90% Federal Funding _ IOOA City Funding Ronefils/PUrpow To Improve the Economic Development of the Denton Municipal Airport, ?ask Schedule (MonthlYear) _ Desl n Bid _ Construct Completed Be Innin pate: --1993 - 1993 1993 Bndin pate: 1993 1993 1993 1993- _ -E Construction Fundin Schedule Funding Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds $0 Auth/Unlssued Bonds $0 Aid In Const. $86 $86 Other (CA.'.s - $9 $9 Total $0 $o $95 $0 $0 - $0 $95 _ - ConstructionnFundin Costs~$1,044's) ~labill SaurCe Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total -14 Services $14 Land $0 Construction $61 $61 Other $0 Total _ $0 _ $0 - $95 $0 $95 Operating Bud et Costs $1,000's - f»X nditure T 92-93 93-94 94-95 96-96 96-97 Total Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets Total $0 $0 $0 - $0 -------$0 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund:-- C.LP Funds ---~MaE____. , Project. Land Acquisition for 1500' Extension North _ _ Project Number: 001907 Estimated cost; _ $1,391,200 Pro)eot Description: Land aqulsition for 1540' Extension North 90% Federal Funding 10% City Funding - BenelltslPurpose: To Improve the Economic Development of the Denton Municipal Airport. Task Schedule (MonthlYoar) _ Deal n Bid Construct Compleled Ba in Date. 11993 1993 --F-'T963-j 993 1993 _1993 ~ 1993 - Ending Data: _T - _ Construction Fundln Schedule $1,000's) Fundln Souroe Prior _ 92-93 93-94 84-95 85-96 _ 96-y7 Total $U Existing Bonds AuthlUnissued Bonds $0 $1 2$0 Aid In Const. $1,262 Other (C.O.'s) $139 $139 Total $0 $0 $1,391 $0 $0 $0 _ - $1,391 construotlon Fundln Costs $1,000's _ Liability Source Prior 92-93 93-94 _ 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Services $0 $1,391 Land $1,391 $0 Constructlon $p Other _ Total $0 J $0 $1.391 $0 $0 - $0 $1,391 Operating Bud t Costs $1,000's Ex nditure T 92-93 _ 93-94 94-95 95-95 - 96-97 Total Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets - - Total $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 •ww.. rMwa:., u.~p3r.5 IbA~Mt raaM4ay l1Mi KA1Rb1 ,rtwha~ wrasM 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: _ C•E,P. Funds Project: Extended North Runway/TaxIWay 1500' _ Project Number: 001908 Estlmated Cost: $1,94b,280 Pro)ect DescOption: Extend North Runway and Taxiway 1500' North, move all I.L.S. 1600' North and Install Taxiway lights, 90% Federal Funding 10% Clty Funding BenetAWPurposa: To Improve the Economic Development of the Denton Municipal Airport, - Task Schedule (MonthlYear) Desl n Bid Construct Completed Beginning Date. 1993 1993 1993 Ending Oate; 1993 11993_ - 1993 1993 _ _ Construction Fundln Schedule ($1,000's) Funding Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total _ Existing Bonds - $0 Auih/Unissued Bonds $0 Aid In Conti. $1,750 $1,750 Other-C.0. _ $195 $195 Total - -$0 _ $0 $1,945 _ $0 $0 _ $0 __-$1,945 Construction Fundln Costs $1,000's) tdablll. Source Prior 92-93 93.94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Services _ 292 Services $292 Land $0 Construction $1,653 $1,653 Other Total $0 $0 $1,945 $0 $0 $0 _ $1,945 Operating Bu et Costs $1,000's Expenditure lypo 92-93 _ 93-94 94-95 96-96' 96-97 Total- - Personal Services $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed _Assets _ $0 Total _ - - - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1993--97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: _--C.LP Funds Pr0 OU JExecut 6J8J81 Parkin Aron Y ap' --1-00'x-1b0' - Project Number; 001909 Estimated Cost; $242,300 - PraJect Description: Executive Jet Parking on 100'x150' 90% Federal Funding 10% City Funding_ _ B0netitslPUrP0se; To Improve the Economic Development of the Denton Municipal Alport. Task Schedule (Monthlyear) Desl n Bid Construct Com-ploted Be Innln t7ate, 1994 1994 = 1994 [Ending Oats: E]l994 1994 1994 1994 Construction Fund n Schedule $1,000'6) _ Fundin Sou(ce Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 - 96-97 Total Existing Bonds AuthlUnissued Bonds $0 Aid in Cosst. $0 $219 $2$0 Other-C.O. $24 _ $24 70181 - - SO $0 $0 $242 $0 $0 $242 Construction Fundln Costs $1,000's _ _ Liability Soil- q Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97_ Total_ Services - - - - Land $36 Construction $0 Other $206 $206 _ $0 Total $0 $0 $0 - $242 - $0 $0 - $242 0 ratln Bud et Costs $1,000's _ EX nditUrB T T 92-93 _ 93-94 94-95 _ 95-96 96-97 Total - _ Personal Services $O Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services Debt Service $0 insurance $O Fixed Assets $0 - - _ $0 Total $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 - - $0 _ .,«..+..r,.,.,..,, rw,tpk lW~SY 4Vwk!GS MiRY11 fgotAM9 Hf1flAU, n7m~n mw..., 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: C.I.P. Funds Ma Project: _ Commercial Service Apron 480'x150' Project Number: 001910 Estimated Cost: - $195,900 - pro}ect Description; Commercial Servica Apron 480'x150' 90% Federal Funding 1_096 CIS Funding _ _ BenefilslPurpose, To Improve the Economic Development_of the Denton Municfpal Airport. Task Scf aduls (Month/Year) Design Bid Construct Completed Be innin Date 1994 1994 1994 _ Ending Date; 1994 1994 994::_7_1 1994 Construction Fundin Schedule $1,000'x) Funding Source Prior 92-93 t114 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds - $0 Auth/Unlssued Bonds $ Aid In Const. $176 $176 Other-C.O. _ $20 _$20 Total $0 _ $0 $196 $O $0 $196 Construction Fundfn Costs $14490'& ~Iab14 Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 6-97 Total Services $29 $29 Land $0 Construction $167 $167 Other $0 Total $0 s0 $0 $196 $0 T- $0 $196 _ C raUn Bud et costs $1,000'6 Ex nditure Type 92-93 _ 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97_ Total Personal Services w - - $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 m Fixed Assets _ $0 Total $0 _ $0 $0 $ $0 $0 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund; ao16 - - - Pro C ~ BeauliNcatlon o! University Drive -Part Il. ~ ~ L~~-~- Pra at Number; oQ15o7 - tatlmetedCast' $790,76b _ Pra)RCt Da$arlptlon: Extension of landscaping a porilon of University Drive, from Malone Street to Loop 288 pe"tits1purpOSe,' Continuation of the landscaping of a major entranceway plan of beautillcation, Task Schedule (Month/Year) _ _ Design Bid _ Construct Corn leted Be innln paler 096 03196 05196 _ ~ndin URte; 0 960`4196 11196_ 12!96 _ Construotion Fundfn Schedule ($t,0"") _ _ Fund(ng Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 70181 _ Existing Bonds - Auth/Unlssued Bonds $0 Unauth/Unissu Bonds S396 $396 Aid In Const,- Grant SO Other - - - $395 $395 Total $0 50 - - _ $0 $0 $0 $0 $791 $791 Constructlon F nding Cost ($1,000's) { Liability Source Prior^ 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 - 96-97 Total Sorvlces Land $87 $$0 Conslruollon $0 Other _ $333_ $333 Total $0 $0 $371 $371 - ~0 $0 $0 $791 $791 0 ratan Bud et Costs $1,000's Ex nditure T - Pe Yip 92-93 93-94 84-95 95-96 96-97 Total Personal Services Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total - - $0 $0 _ $0 ---SO ...e• r I:a.v...: uPm:a 4J4N!7 tt1iltq :FY[i7 W1.22H7i ►fnR4My Mf~tlpt q~A„ 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund; - - Prp t' ' HIGHWAY 77 866TIFICATION - Ma - - - Pro act Number; 001511 Estimated Cost: $556,329___~ pro}oct Oesoription: Design of a scenic park based on a historic d ,sign, in the Pecan Creek watershed. Sanefilslpurpose: Landscaping of highway 77, from Orr Street to 1-35. Task Schedule (Monih/Yeat) Design Bid _ Construct Completed 6eglnningDate; oil- 03/95-- 05!95 i;ndfn 0gte: 02/95 04195 11195 12196 _ Construction Fundlnp Schedule $1.000's) Funding Source Prior- 92-93 1~93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Existing Bonds Auth/Unlssued Bonds $0 Unauth/Unlssu Bonds $0 $278 $278 Old In Const.-Grant _ $278 $278 Other Total $0 $0 _ _ $0 - _ $0 $0 $b56 $0 $556 Construct[ onF nding Cost {$1,000'-sLt95-96 Liability Source Prior 92-93-94 94-95 96-97 TServices $39 Land $39 $0 $0 Construction $234 $234 Other _ - - - - $283 $283 Total _ $0 $0 _ $0 $0 _ $556 $0 $566 0 ratin Bud at Costs $1,000's Expenditure Type 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total - Personal Services Supplies $0 h4aintenance $0 Services $20 $20 Debt Service $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total - $0 ` $0 $0 $20 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund. C.I.P. - Ma - Pro eor LIBRARY PHASE II _ Project Number 0070-03 Estimated cost, $1,700,000 Projaat 066cr1pNom Additional Iloor space added to existing building (15,000 sci-fi.), SanafltslPurposa; To provide additional quailty library services to residents In a heavily populated region outside of Central Area. Task Schedule (MonlhlYear) _ Des! n Bld Construct Completed Beginning pate; 1-01-95 1-01-96 10-01-9fi Sndn Date; 1-10-95 1-05-96 10-11-96 10-01-97 Construction Funding Schedule $1,000's} Funding Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 _ 96-97 Total Existing Bonds - $0 AuthJUnIssued Bonds $0 Aid In Const, $0 Unauthorized Bonds _ $120 $1,580 _ $1,700_ Total - $0 $0 $0 $120 _ $0 -$1,580 $1,700 Constructlon Fundln Costs $1,000's Liability Soproe Prior 92-93_ 93-94 94-95_ 95-96 ` 96-97 Total services $120 - $120 Land $0 Constructlon $1,580 $1,580 Other $0 Total $0 _ $0 $0 $120 $0 $1,580 $1,700 Operating Bud et Costs' $1,000's - - - - - - ex ndlture Type 92-93 _ 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total _ Personal Services $189 $189 Supplies $4 $4 Maintenance $4 $4 Services $12 $12 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 $0 - - $0 --0 J- _ __$284 _ $284 i.._ ......e.. i-~.... i r 1.-....I l_: i1,WGr.1 ,wnW. kwuarwr Y•w~K 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 0062 - Lelsura Services -R Y- - Ma ---y Fund, Pro act yDENIA CENTER EXPANSION/R_ENOVATION Pro act Number: 006205 - - Estimated Cost: - $1 254,400 ROOM DescrkptloiY This would allow for an 8,000 SOL expansion and renovatlon of existing center facilities to Include meeting and game rooms, _ - BenefltslPUIws ,J Provide critical expansion to this arorusod recreation center which shares space with Borman Elementary and would rectify design problems of original building. TasK Schedule (MonthlYoar) ~aslgn___ Bid Construct Complated Beginning Date, 1J-01-9fi 3-01-67 6-01-97 2-01-97 5-01-97 7-01-97-_ 7-01-97 w _ Endin Dete, Construction Fundin Schedule $1,000 s - Fundln Source Prior 92-93 93-9q 94-95 95-96 96"97--- Total $0 Existing Bonds $0 AuttVunissued Bonds $0 Aid er Co. - _ -$1,,250 $1,250 _ Other J _ Total $0 - $4 $1,250 004'8 $0 $4 - $U $1,250 Gonstruollon Fundln Costs $i, - - $88 hlabtlk Souf_ - Prior 92-93 93-94 94~9b - 95-9fi 9fi=97 _ ota _ $88 $0 Services $1 1$0 band $1,162 Construction - - $0 Other-Unauthorized _ _ - $0 $0 r $1,250 Total $0 $0 $1,264 _ SD - 0 eratln Bud al costs ($1,000's - _ otal Ex nditure T - 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 530 _ $30 Personal Services $11 $11 $15 $15 Supplies Maintenance $1g $18 Services $0 Debt Service $0 - Insurance $1 Flexed Assets - - $75 Total - ~4 $0 -$0 - - 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0063-Packs Division _ _ Ma Project: - UPGRADE EXISTING PARK SYSTEM Pro ect Number: 006301 Estimated Cost: $1,500,000 Project Description: Renovation of 14 playground sites, new park furniture, resurfacing tennis courts, parking col renovation, restrocm renovation, landscaping, and irrigatlon. Benallta/Purpo s: This upgrade will Increase user safely, allow more efficient maintenance, and Improve appearance of arks, enhancing quality of life. Task Schedule (Month/Year) Design Bid Construct Com leted Beginning Date: 10-01-93 3-01-94 6-01-94~ Ending Date: 2201-94~ 94 16-01-95 6-01-96 Construction Fundln SGttiedU10A_000's) Fuading Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 - 95-96 96-97 Total - Existing Bonds $0 Auth/Unissued Bonds $0 Aid In Const. $0 Other $1,500 $1,500 Total $0 $0 $1,500 $0 - $0 $0 $1,500 Construction i unding Costs jS1,OW's _ _ r: Liability 6ource Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 _ 96-97-~ Total Services Services $90 Land $0 Construction $705 $705 $1,410 $0 Other Total $0 -$0 $795 $705 $0 $0 $1,500 Operating Bud et Costs $1,t)00's Expenditure Type ^T 92-93 - 93_-94 - 94-95 - 95-96 96_-97- Total Personal Services Y - $0 Supplies $1 $1 Maintenance $2 $2 Services $7 $7 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 $0 Fixed Assets - - - - - - - Total _ $0 - $0 $0 -$0 $10 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0063 Map Project : SCHOOL PRACTICE FIELDS Project Number: 0063-02 Estimated Cost: $330,000 Prot Description, Development of selected athletic fields at selected elementary schools for practice fields to be used by youth athletic teams. RenetltsRufpos@: Enhance the opportunitles for youth athletic Wants to practice on sate and adequate sized fields. Task Schedule (Month/Year) Desi n Bid Construct Completed Beginning Date 3196 - 6197 _ 6197-_ Ending Date; - Construction Fundin Schedula$1,000's) Fundin Fiource Prior 92-93 93_94 _ 94-95 96-96 _ 96-97 Total Existing Bonds $0 Auth/Unissued Bonds $0 Aid In Const. $0 Other-Unauthorized $330 $330 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $330 $0 _ $330 _ Construction Fu ndln~Costs~$1,000's Cost Source ' Prior 92-93- 93-94 94-95 95-96 96 97 Total $U Services Land $0 Construction $330 $330 Other $0 Total $0 $0 $0 --_$330 $0 _ _$0 $330 _ O ratln Bud et Costa $1,000's) Expenditure Tp . 92-93 93-94 -94-95 96-96,- 96-97 Total Personal Services $24 $24 Supplies $2 $2 Maintenance $7 $7 Services $1 $1 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 $0 Fixed Assets $34 - $0 - -----$34 Total $0 $0 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0063-Parks Division_ Map-_ Prowl: TOWNSHIP II NEIGHBORHOOD PARK ACQUI & DVLP Project Number; 006303 _ Estimated Cost: Project Description: Park land acquisition and development in Township II subdivision. HenefitslPurposa: Provide a park to Township II which is not in service area of a park & Improve quality of other neighborhood parks city-wide. TOWNSHIP II IS A CITIZEN REQUEST.__. Task Schedule (MnthlY?ar) Design Bid Construct Completed Be Innin Date 10-01-94 2-01-95 6-01-95 EncNn Date;` 2-01-96 4-01-95 5-01-97 5-01-97 _ Construction Funding Schedule ($t,t}00's} _ _ - - - Funding Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-9fi 96-97 Total Existing Bonds AuthlUnlssued Bonds $0 Aid In Const, $0 Other-Unauthorized $225 - $225 Total $0 $0 $0 $225 $0 $0 $226 Construction Fu Win Costs $1,000's _ _ Wabilli Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Services $0 Land $150 $150 Construction $75 $75 Other Total _ $0 -$0--0 $225 ~SO SO ---$225 - Operating Bud et Costs $1,000's Expenditure Typa _ 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total _ _ Personal Services - - $15 $15 Supplies $2 $2 Maintenance $8 $6 Services $10 $10 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total -»T-T $U $0 $0 $35 $0 $35 •~w,u; ~e~,ssr-:~ ~x~xi.rt~.~~ eetrwax awe. d.x..... 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGnAM n 3-Parks Division Ch OUTDOOR AMPHITHEATRE DEVELOPMENT to ct Number: 006304 EstimaledCost: $1,500,000 Project Descrlptlon; Development of an outdoor amphitheatre, parking, and related recreational facilitles to house a historicai- musical drama. REQUESTED BY DENTON CO, AMPHITHEATRE ASSN., INC,__ Benetils/Pur This project will generate revenue and provide - economic development benefits to the City while providing a unique facility to this region. Task Schedule (MonlhlYear) Oesign_ Bid Construct Corn leted BB Innin pate; 10-01-96 3-01-97 6-01-07 Endln Date; ~ 02-01-97 6-01-97 - 1-01-98 1-01-99 _ Construction Fundln-Schedule 1,000's) Funding Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-96 95-96 96-97 Tclal Existing l9onds - - - - - Auth/Unl3sued Bonds $0 Aid In Const, $0 Other-Unauthorired $0 F Total $1,600_ _ $1,500 - $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $1,500 - $1,500 _ Construction Fundin Costs $1,000's Uablll &urce Prlor 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total _ Services - r. - - Land $120 $120 Construction $0 $1,380 $1,3$0 Other Total $0 $0 ap - SO - $0 _ $0~- $1,600 $11500 0 ratan Bud et Costs $1,000_s~ EK nditure T ---,92-93 _ . 92-93 93-94 94-96 , 96-96 96-97 Total - Personal Services - - $26 - $25 Supplies Maintenance $5 $5 $6 Services $5 Debt Service $10 $10 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund 0063-Parks Division _ DP - - Pro a 6-V IC CENTIcN_Pokk RENOVAT_IO_N & IMP_ROVENENT- Project Number: 006305 - - Estimated Cost $1,050,000 Pro)sct DOWIP110nt Park Improvements and des gn and ongineerin0 for creek water features, 4n_eflis/PUr pose This park is often he iocai paint for city-wide special events and needs renovation & improvements to accommodate these activities & showcase a quailty city park. Task Schedule (Month/Yoor) - Desl n Bid _ Construct Completed 0 Inning Date, f0-01-s4 3-01-95 - i6_01_95 'n Date:'' 02-01-95 5-01-95 12-01-96 _112-01-96____ Construction Fundin Schedule $1,000's) Fundin SOUrce Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds _ - - $0 Auth/Urilssued Bonds $0 Aid In Const. $0 Other-Unauthorized $1,050 Total _ $0 $0 $0 $1,050 50 5o $1,050 CGnsiructlan nding Cost Liability source Prior 192-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Services $120 $120 Land $0 Construction $930 $930 Other $0 Total $0 - - $1,050 - $0 - g0 $1,050 - 0 ratin 0111 et Costs 51,000's) _ Ex nditur'Typa 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96_-_ 96_-97 _Total Personal Services - $15 $16 Supplies $1 $1 Maintenance $2 $2 Services $2 $2 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 $0 W~ft A! 1992-97 CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Mme,- t 0063-Parks Division _ NORTHEAST COMMUNITY PARK ACQUISITIOmber- Cost _ o,ooo~ J_eacrlption, Acquire 25-or mare acres of lartheast Denton tot future development near Loop 296, Purpose; Future recreation faclltlios in a growing f the Clty. Task Schedule (MonthlYee) Desl n Bid - Construct -110-01-97 Completed Be innln Date 10-01-97 Ending Date; Total Conslructlgn Fundin Schedule 1,000's) _ 95-96 Fundln Source Prior 92-93 - 93-94~_ 94-95 $p ` Existing Bonds $0 - $0 AuthlUnissued Bonds Aid in Const $250 - $260 $ Ocher-Unaulhortzed _ Total $0 $p $0 $250 250 Construction Fundln Costs $1,000'6 Total - 92-93 93-94 9496 95-96 $0 ulablli Source _ Prior Services $250 $250 $0 Land $0 Construction _ --~§260 $260 Other - $0 $O $0 - $o Total So - p ratln Bud et Costs $1,000'sZ- 95-96 96_97 _ Total_ 1$10 Ex nditureT A2-93 93-994-85 $5Personal Services $1 Supplies $1 Maintenance Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $6 Fixed Assets ------------$p - --S0 - 50 _ _~$0 - $6 6 ; Total 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0063-Parks Division_ Mel-- Pro ecti EVERS PARK ACQUISITIONIDEVELOPMENT - Project Number. 006307 Estimated Cast; $750,000 Proj9Gt Description, Project includes acquisition of 5 acres adjacent to Evers Park south of Evers Elementary. Upgrade 2 existing ballfields, new lights, reslroom and concession stand, sewer line. Senefits/Putpoae; 'Enhance existing facilitles, provide for growth of programs of programs. Task Schedule (Monlh/Year) Design Bid Construct Completed " 10-01-96 4-01-97 7-01-97 10-01-98 oil nnin Pate: _ Ending Date: Constructlon Funding Schedule $1,000x) Funding Source Prior 92-93 - 93-94 94-95 95-96 _96-97 Total Existing Bonds $0 $0 AutWUnlssued Bonds Aid In Cons1• $0 $750 $7$0 Other-Unauthorizbd - Total $o - $0 _$o SO _$0 $760 $760 Constructlon Fundln Costs $1,000'x) l.Iablii Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-96 _ 95-96 96-97 Total- $25 $25 Services $200 $200 Land $525 $525 Construction Other - - - Total $0 - $0 $0 - $0 -$0 $760 . $760-1 0 ratimlt ud et Costs $1,000's _ Expenditure T 92-93 93-94 84-96 95-96_ 96-97_- Total Personal Services $20 $20 $2 $2 Supplies $3 $3 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets - _ $0 - - $25 - - $25 $0 ../rte. 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0063-Parks Division _ I project: ct: MACK PARK ACQUISITIONIDEVELOPMENT Pro act Number: 006300 Estimated Cost; $760,000 _ Pro)"t Description; Purchase of 10 acres of land east of park south of of McKinney, redevelopment of playground area, parking, and athletic field areas, Be nef 1181 Purpose: To enhance existing facilitles, upgrade playground, and provide for buffer areas and nelghborhood services. Task Schedule (Month/Year) Desi n Bid Construct Completed. - B innin-Date: ' 10-Oi-96 3-01-97 7-01-97 8.01-98 s_nding Daate _ Construction Funding Schedule ($1,000 S Funding Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96797 Total Existing Bonds $0 AuthJUnlssued Bonds $0 Aid In Const, $750 $750 Other-Unauthorized _ Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $760 75 Construction Fundln Costs~,000's _ Uabill 6oufce Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 _ 96-97 _ $26 Total $25 Services $300 $300 Land $425 $425 Construction $0 _ $0 Other - - - - - Total $0 $0 $0 $750 $760 0 rating sud et Costs $1,000's _ _ - Ex ncilture Typo 92-93 93-94 94 95,_ 95-96 - 96-97 Total $ Personal Services) $ $2 $2 $2 $2 Supplies $3 $3 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets _ _ 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: -0063 lM.~_... ~ Pro t; DENIAPARKACCUISITIQ_N1D_EVEIAPMENT !T *t Number: 006309 _ Estlmaled Cost: $750,000 - Project Description; io-e6 slPurpose: Project includes completion of Park Master Plan with 2 lighted softball fields, paved parking, concession/ restroom, trail y stern. Acquire 10acres south side of park for open. space, Task Schedule (Month/Year) _ Desirn _ Bid _ Construct Corq eted se Innin Date; 10-1-95 3-1-96 7-1-96 _ Endln pate;- - 9-1_ 97 - Construction Funding Schedule ($11000's) Funding Source prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 - 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds $0 Auth/Unlssued Bonds $0 Aid In Const. $0 Other-Unauthorized $760 $760 Total $0 - --OO $o $o _ $750 $0 - $750 Cost Source Prior 92-93 93••94 94-95 7Total Services t.and $0 Construction Fundln Costs $1,00010-=----- $100 $100 Construction $0 Other $325 $325 $650 Total $0 $0 $0 $426 $326 $%60 O ratln Bud et Costs $1,000`a $p _ Expenditure Typo 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 86-$7 Total Personal Services - $20 $20 Supplies $5 $5 Maintenance $3 $3 Serviusc $2 $2 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 $0 - -$0 $30 $30 ! k's"xiila*:t iN*ssrt ~+ryq,. rw+*w 1993-'97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0063-Parks Division-- Pro t; ORTt~ LAKES PARK DEVELOPMENT PHASE II - Pro of Number; Ma - 006310_ EsUmatedCostc Sf,700,000 RrAJect Qescriptlon, Project will si d rd estroom facilities in the soccer - complexlplcnic area, 3 new soccer fields, a Rugby Ifeld, 2 multipurpose courts, 4 tennis courtspavod parking, & roadways, enef)tslPurpose: Project will enhance existing facflilles allowing for more capacity, safety, and Improve park and nefghborhood appearance T9sk Schedule (MonlhlYesf)' Deal n B Innln pate; Bid - _ Construct Completed 10-1-96 3-1`96 7-1-96 L Sndin Oatet IS-1-96 71-98 H7 1-98 - Construction Funding Schedule $1,000's) f unding Source Prior 92-93 --96 93-94 _ 94-95 Existing Bonds 9&~96-- 96-97 Total Auth/Unlssued Bonds $0 Aid In Const. $0 Other-Unauthorized $0 Tote! _ $0 $0 $0 $850 $850 _ $1,700 W _ Construction Fundin Costs 51,080'6` $0 -$850 - $850 $1,700 QOSt $OUrCA Prior 92-93 Services - 83-94 94-95 95-86 96-97 -Total Land $120 $120 Construction $0 Other $1,580 Total $1,680 50 $o _ $o $o - 0 ralln Bud et Costs $1,000's 120 - $1 580 _ $1 70Q Expenditure Type " 92-93 93-94 94-95 Personal Services 96-97 Total Supplies - $50 $50 Maintenance $10 $10 Services $10 $10 Debt Service $10 $10 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total $0 - - - - $0 _ -------$80_. 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund; _ 0002-_FMD_~- - Map Project: _ LVERGY M-ANAGEME-NT - Pro e;t Number. 000202 Estimated Cost $276,000 Project pesofiption: Install a now energy management system In tho Police Station, North Lakes, Denla, MILK, Jr., Visual Arts, and all Fire Statlons, Eenefits/purposn: Energy systom to control environment and add comfort to buildings. Also, will reduce maintenance time and Increase life of equipment. _ _ - Task Schedule (MonthlYear) Desi n Bid Construct Completed Be Innin Date, 10-1-98 _ 8-196 6-1=9fi Ending Date; 5-i-96 7-1-96 7-1-9fi fit-97 Construction Fundin Schedule 11-1000's) _ Funding Source Prior _ 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds $0 AulhlUnissued Bonds $0 Aid In Cosst $0 Other $276 $276 Total $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0 $276 $276 Construction Funding Costs $1,0o0's) LIablllty Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95+ 95-96 - 96-97 _ Total - Services $20 $20 Land $0 Construction $266 $256 Other $0 - Total $o_ _ $0 _ $0 $0 $0 __$276 ~----.$278 0 oralln Bud of Costs Ex nditure Type _ 92-93 93-94 94-96 95-96 ^ 96-97 Total Personal Services ~ - - - $0 Supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total _$0 $0 $0 $0 ~f4+ Ka}n"'v., kMy1N5 rev,'„ wv...-1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - 0002-FMp Pro SMALL BUSINESS INCUBATOR Pro er. 000204 Funt !~stist: $230,000 - e Station sw1 nla smaN businoss Proription. Re model Fir indiSenposet the building and Croate office andlor I lgh cturing space for small businesses. - Task Schedule (MonthlYear) Desi n Bid Construct Completed Be inning Date; 10-1`3 - 6_1-93 T7-1 6-1-;93 7r1-93 -96 0 s} - Total Gonstructlon Funding Schedule ($1'00 93-94 94-95 _ 95-96 ^ - 96-97_ - $0 Funding OUiCO Priar~ 92-93 Existing Bonds $0 Authlunissued Bands $115 16 $116_ Aid in ConsLlGrant $1$116 --C0 $ Other-Unauthorized _ i-0- $0 $0 _ $0 _$230 - T01a1 - Construction Funding Costs $1,000'6 Total- - 92-93 93-94 94-95 - 95-96 96-97 _ $0 Uablll source Prior $i6 Services $16 $0 Land $214 Construction $214 $230 _ $214 Other - - - $0 $0 $16 Total - O ratln Bud etcosts ~$1,000's) - 96_97 Total 92-93 93-94 94-95__-- _ 96-9 $63 - $180 e T - $67 $60 $9 Services $3 $3 $3 $1 $1 $2 $4 ce $35 $35 $35 $105 rMaRntenan $0 $0 bt Service $15 De Insurance $14--- -$1 $313 Flied Assets - - $0 $110 $100 - - $1 - - - - 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 0002 - -FMD Pro Qt' _ P E II & III SPACE IMPLEMENTATION [Pro ct Number 000205 =stimated Cost: fpjeG Aescflptfgn; Phase,!! & III Implementation for nd nly - reconstruction of Moore Building, Old City Hall, ervice center, civic center. _ N911Af""PV4pOS9c Provide office space for General Fund stag, - Task Schedule (Month/Year) Desf n_ Bfd Construct Completed Be Innin pate: T' 10-1-96 y 11 197 1-1-98 - -Ending Date; 11-1-97 12 1-97 12-1-98 12-1-98 Fundln Construction Fundln Schedule $1,000'x) Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 Existing Bonds 95-96 _ 9697 - Total - AuthlUnissued Bonds - Aid In Const, $0 $0 Other-Unauthorized $0 Total - $0 $0 $0 $1,200 $1,200 Construction Fundin Costs $1,000'sZ $o $1,200 - $1,200 Uabili Source' Prior 92-93 _ _ r Services 83-~ 94-95 _ 95-96 - 96-97 Total Land - - - $0 Construction $0 Other_ Total - - $1,104 $10104 $96 $1,200 - - $96 ---$0 $1,200-1 Ex end(ture T e - 0 satin Sud et Casts $1,A00'a 92-93 - - 93 6 - Personal Services -94 y5_96 9697 - Total Supplies -$0_ Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 - Total 0 $o - 0 $0 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM [p~ nd 0002-FMD__- ject: CITY HALL FIRE SPRINKLERS act Number: 000208 ' Map------ imatod Cost: - $131,000 - *ctDescrf Ilom _ p insl_ail now Nr9 sprinkler system Mall, -_co @nefits/P m9eiiur - Fire safely - ng code, - Task Schedule (Month/Yoarj _ Design _ Bid _ Construct Completed Beginnin Date: 10-1-96 1-1-97- Endfn Date; 12-30-96 2-1-97 10-1-9 - - - 10 1-9710-1- Construction FundiFnSchedule 011_000 s _ ftFunlinn ce LP~rior 92-93 s 9394 85`96 9d Bond- - $0 orized $0 $0 $0 _ gp -0 - $131 $131 -GonStructlonFUndingCo,ts $j,000'sI_ $0 $131 - j31 L10111 Source Prior 92-93- - Services 93-94 94- 95 95-96 9fi-_ 97 - Total Land -$9 - Construction $9 Other $0 Total - - $0 - - $122 $122 $o _o -$s 1-x$0 __$0 Ex rlditure T O ratln Bud at Costs $1,000'sL $122 _---$131 YPe-T~ 92-93 93-94 94-95 _ Personal Services 966-97 - Supplies - Total' Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 _ $3 $3 Fixed Assets Total $0 $0 $0 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund. 0002-FMD LMtt , Pro ect NEW POOF FOR ONE UTILITY FUND BLDING Project Number 000209 Estimated Cost: $175,000 - _ Project Descrlptlon; Install a new root for the Service Center. Benefits/Purposa; Prevent roof leakage protecting building assets (16 year warranty), Task Sr;hodule (MonthlYear) Design Bid _ Construct Comploted _ Beginning 110 -1-96 121197 6 621 Endin Date* 1-97-_- 12-1-57-_ Construction Fundin Scnsdule ($1,000'x) Funding Source Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Existing Bonds $0 Aulh/Unlssued Bonds $0 Aid In Const. $0 Other-Unauthorized $175 $176 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ~ $175 $175 Construction Funding Casts $1,000'6) t_Iabitlt Source ° Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Total Services $0 Land $0 Construction $175 $175 Other _ $0 Total $0 ~$0 $175 Operating Bud etGosts $1,000's~ - 9-6-47-- Ex rtdlture Typo 92.93 93-94 94-95 95-96 Total tal Personal Services - - $0 supplies $0 Maintenance $0 Services $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance $0 Fixed Assets $0 Total - ------$0 ---_$0 $0 ~Q $ rarkt :AM'?~ ilWUC'%AY f YFiKI 155Y/AT 4TYAY~:Yp1A£Y/5? 1993-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Fund: 0054 _ pro ot: ~Outdoor Warning System Pro ct Number; 005401 Estimated Cost: $3007000 - project Descdptlon; Outdoor W-arning System BenetltsiPurpOW Notity Public In the event of tornado, etc. Task ~ahedu~o (MontnrYear) Desi n Bid construct Compieled il93 A193 6199 Beglnnin Date: tyg3 Endin Date: Total - cons1ructlon Fundln Schedule 1,000 s1 pundln SoUrce ~ Prior 92-93 93-94 94-95_,- 9b-96 ~ 96-97 Existing Bonds $0 $0 Auth/Unlssued Bonds $300 Aid In Const. $3001- $30 Other _W s0 SO - $0- _ $300 $0 Total Construction Funding Costs $1,000's - _ - Total _ _ 95-996 - - r96 97 _Lhbiil ource Prior92-93 93-94 4-95 $0 Services $300 land $300 $0 F_quipment $0 $300 Othef 00a0$ Bud, 3t Costs $1,A00's) - Total Total - O _r in 95-96 96-97 $O Ex ndttufe Typo 9243 - 93-94 94-95 $0 personal Services $0 Supplies $p Maintenance $0 Servic" $0 Debt Service $0 Insurance gp $0 Fixed Assets Total - ~ ~ ~ ~ .J , ~ , clry of DENrom TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Janet Simpson, Park Planning Coordinator Bob Tickner, Superintendent of Parks DATE: June 3, 1992 SUBJECT: Civic Center Pool Renovation The following report summarizes the direction recommended by staff for the renovation of the Civic Center Fool. BACKGROUND: In 1991, as part of the long range strategic planning for park development, the Park Board recommended and City Council authorized CIP funding in fiscal year 1995-96 (See Attachment I) for renovation of the Civic: center pool. In early 1992, the Park Board and Council began considering options for the implementation of the remaining 1986 Bond funds. one of those options was the development and expansion of the North Lakes Recreation Center including an indoor/outdoor pool. During the March 24, 1992 joint session of the city Council and Park Board, the City Council directed the Board and staff to schedule neighborhood meetings for public review of those options and requested a recommendation for the repair and renovation of the Civic Center Pool. It was the Council's contention that before a new pool is constructed, the City should conduct a study regarding the repair and renovation of the existing facility at Civic Center Park. Existing available bond money was recommended to fund the Civic Center pool renovation. In April, 1992, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board conducted a series of six neighborhood meetings to discuss the implementation of the 1986 Bond funds. Conclusions from those meetings and the Park Board recommendations were presented to the city council on April 28, 1992 (Attachment II). on page four of the attached Park 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 4341529 June 3, 1992 Page - 3 PHASE I.A. & I.B.s Repair and Renovation of civic center Pool The Civic Center Pool was constructed in 1966 and is in full operation today, meeting existing city health standards for water quality, purity, and public safety (See Attachment III). The Civic Center pool exceeds the Texas Department of Health Swimming Pool Standards for a circulation rate of 8 hours or less for an average pool load. The pool has a current capacity of circulation of 6.2 hours which is right at the recommended rate for pools with heavy bathing loads. When repairs are made it is recommended that the circulation and pump system be upgraded to a 6 hour rate or less to accommodate the projected increase in bather loads. Our follow-up conversation with Norman Hatfield concluded that the circulation rates that he quoted to the council in April were based on the State of Iowafs standard for optimal pool performance. Mr. Hatfield was speaking in generalities and it was never the intention to leave an impression that the City of Denton pool water quality was substandard. The Civic Center pool water quality is checked regularly by the City health department and meets or exceeds the City ordinance standard (See Attachment III). Phase I.A. repairs listed kjelow are critical to providing a quality service and to avoid a major shut down due to an unexpected mechanical failure. The Parks Department continues to maintain, patch, and repair the pool and its equipment (much of which has passed its life expectancy) as needed. However, at some paint due to age, these "nuts and bolts" items must be replaced including: • New gutter system $ 85,000 • Replace the existing pool deck 50,000 • New pumps 15,000 • New r,:irculation piping 45,000 • New filtration system 70,000 Phase I.A. Subtotal $ 265,000 Contingency 4% 10,600 Architect Fees 19.000 PHASE I.A. TOTAL $ 2941600 Phase I'.B. addresses another critical area, the issue of public perception (which drives revenue). The overall appearance of the pool has deteriorated significantly, even to the point that some citizens have commented that they will not use the facility. This negative image has also developed a perception that a crime element exists which also deters patrons. The wood structures and fences have decayed, pool deck furniture was eliminated several years ago due to deterioration, and existing pool equipment (ladders, diving boards, lights, etc.) must be replaced. June 3, 1992 Page - 4 An additional feature that is added to this initial phase is the construction of a separate toddler pool This pool would be programmed specifically for very young children who are unable to physically negotiate in even two feet of water. A fountain or other water play features would be included in this pool. This new attraction will renew participation in an age group that is not currently served at the pool. Phase I.B. will also include: • Reconstruction of pool buildings (bathhouse, concession) $ 100,000 • Restore pool equipment and deck furniture 35,000 • Replace existing wood and chain link fence and landscaping 53,000 • Eliminating two on-street parking lots (34 spaces) and building a new 50 space parking lot on Bell Avenue. 50,000 • Toddler Pool 45.000 Phase Y.H. Subtotal $ 283.000 contingency 4% 11,400 Architect fees 20,000 PHASE T.B. TOTAL $ 3140400 PHASE I.A. & I.B. TOTAL $ 6090000 Although partial funding from a state matching grant was discussed R-- in the original proposal, upon verification with Texas Parks and Wildlife, we found this minimal level of renovation and repair would not meet the staters criteria for funding approval. PHASE II - conversion to a Zero-Depth Recreation Pool - Approximately $1,000,000 including Phase I This phase involves converting the shallow end of the existing pool to a more leisure-recreational pool. The pool edge would begin at a zero depth and gradually slope to about three feet in depth, much like a beach. This shallow water will accommodate younger children and those who prefer to simply wade, splash, or play. The beach affect also accommodates the disabled since no steps are required into the pool. Water play equipment would also be placed in the shallow water as added enhancements. in addition, because a larger portion of the pool would be shallow a greater number of participants could use the pool. The deeper end of the pool would remain and continue to accommodate the swim team's competitive .needs. The competitive pool would be physically separated from shallow recreation pool by a bulkhead which would also serve as a runway for lifeguards. This major renovati.c,1 of the pool would extend the pool life 25 to 30 years. June 3, 1992 Page - 5 hrsse III - Pool Expansion As stated in the architect's original proposal, this phase was to build a new competitive pool at Civic Center Park, demolish existing pool buildings, build a new bath house and concession area, and add another 60 space parking lot. With two community park land purchases approaching and the attendant planning necessary to development basic facilities, it is requested that staff be allowed the opportunity to fully analyze the appropriate location of this new competitive pool for the City. The major long-term impact this facility would have on the City the Parks and Rshould be considered as ecreation master plan is developed in the next er. five year Since no new CIP funding is identified until the 1996-97 fiscal year for the pool expansion and to avoid any delays, it seems most anmaster plan to place the making the decision the on land. acquisitions and other pool before beneficial in Civic Center Park. With approval of the city Council, staff will contract with the appropriate experts in the field to develop working drawings and specifications for Phase I in order to bid this project in the fall. Jan t Si son Robert K. T ckner Attachments AJJ003B3 June 31 1992 Page - 1 of 4 PHASE 1A (bee Page 3 of Memo) FUNDING OPTIONS CIVIC CENTER POOL PROJECT OTHER AFFECTED PROJECTS PHASE I.A. SOUTH PARK LAND ACQUISITION $294.600 $500.000 Funding Option 1 • $294,600 from 1985 G.O. Bond • $200,000 from 1986 G.O. Bond program interest earnings. program. • $300,000 from 1986 G.O. Bond program interest earnings. STREET PROJECTS • No funding. Funding Option 1 Issues: 1985 Bona program interest earnings that have been earmarked for street projects would be eliminated if these available funds are used for the Civic Center Pool. No tax increase is associated with this Option. F CIVIC CENTER POOL PROJECT OTHER AFFECTED PROJECTS PHASE I.A. SOUTH PARK LAND ACQUISITION $294.600 S500 000 Funding Option 2 • $294,600 from new • $200,000 from 1986 G. 0. Bond Certificates of Obligation. program. • $300,000 from 1986 G. O.Bond program interest earnings. STREET PROJECTS $310,000 • $310,000 from 1985 G. 0. Bond program interest earnings. Funding Option 2 Issues: This option funds Phase I.A., South Park acquisition, and Street projects. A tax increase of $ .0023 would result from the sale of ($294,600) Certificates of obligation. CHART June 3, 1992 Page - 2 of 4 CIVIC CENTER POOL PROJECT OTHER AFFECTEA PROJECTS PHASE I.A. SOUTH PARK LAND ACQUISITION 5-- 2 4-_ 60 0 5500 000 Funding 0~ ptiOn 3 • Use $294,600 from 1986 G.O. • Bond sinking fund $500,000 from 1986 G. 0, Bond reimbursement. program. STREET PROJECTS $310,000 • $310,000 from 1985 G. O, Bond program interest earnings. Funding option 3 Issuers This Option has a significant imact On Park designated bonds by reducing the reserve of 1986 Bonds to $1,231,850 for future recreation center development. This strategy will allow us to complete street projects from the 1985 G.O. Bond program interest earnings. No tax increase is associated with this option. June 3, 1992 Page - 3 of 4 PHASE 1.A. AND I.B. (see Pages 3 and A of Memo) FUNDING OPTIONS CIVIC CENTER POOL PROJECT OTHER AVYECTED PROJECTS PHASE I.A. and I.B. SOUTH PARK LAND ACQUISITION $609,000 _ $500,000 Funding Ogtion 4 • $300,000 from 1985 G. 0. • $200,000 from 1986 G. 0. Bond Bond program interest program. earnings. • $309,000 from now • $300,000 from 1986 G. 0. Bond Certificates of obligation. progr.atrL interest earnings. r STREET PROJECTS • No funding. !Funding opt on 4 Issues: 1985 Bond program Merest earnings that have been earmarked for street projects would be eliminated if these available funds are used for the Civic Center Pool. A tax increase of $ .0024 would result from the sale of $309,000 in Certificates of obligation. CIVIC CENTER POOL PROJECT OTHER AFFECTED PROJECTS PHASE I.A. and I.B. SOUTH PARK LAND ACQUISITION $609,000 ....15001000 B'undinq Option 5 • Sell $609,000 in new • $200,000 from 1986 G.O. Bond Certificates of Obligation. program. • $300,000 from 1986 G. 0. Bond program. STREET PROJECTS $310,000 • $310,000 from 1985 G. 0. Bond program interest earnings. Fund ng Opt on 5 Issues: This Option funds Phase I.A., South Park acquisition, and Street projects. A tax increase of $ .0047 would result from the sale of $609,000 in certificates of Obligation. June 3r 1992 Page 4 of 4 - OTHER AFFECTED PROJECT8 CIVIC CENTER POOL PROJECT SOUTH PARK LAND ACQUISITION PHASE T.A. and I.B. ~ypp 000 F-UnAina Option 6 • Use $309,000 from 1986 G.O. • $500,000 from 1986 G. 0. Bond program. Bond sinking fund reimbursement and then sell $300,000 in new certificates of Obligation. STREET PROJECTS $310,000 H $310 1 program 0 infrom terest e earnings. n f~cant impact on Park Fund ng Op on 6 Issueet Th s Opt on ha ds as, a by reducing the reserve of 1986 designated bon Bonds to $1,231,850 for future Will Te center allow us to development. This strategy complete street projects from the 1985 G.O. Bond A tax increase interest earnings. ° program 000 in $ .0024 would result from the sale of $309, Certificate3 of Obligation. CIT'r Of 029TOR CAPITAL IMNOW- fAIr - !1`-liar-91 DA14 PROJECT DETAIL- ##11#1#1iii### ######i####isi#i#i##i##s#4i ;*,a###i####i#s#i#######i#i#####**ORGN-NO*YEAR* PROJECT TITLE: POOL RENOVATION/EXPANSION PROJECT 1. 0060-01 1995 TTL EST CAPITAL COST: 31,884 Thousand Month Year TTL EST 1st YEAR O&M COST: 60 Thousand EST START DATE: OCT 1995 TTL EST 4.NNL'AL O&M COST: 60 Thousand EST COMPL DATE: MAY 1997 iif,##ii#si#ii#i#####~.#i##fffi#i#iif###f#*##i#1111#1111##i####1111####f iii####iiif###iffffff 1, BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will allow for the complete renovation. of the existing pool facility and the addition of a zero-depth pool and diving well, II. PROJECTED PROJECT BENEFITS/PURPOSE: Enhanced recreational (swimming) opportunities for Denton citizens and renovation of a facility that was constructed in 1966 and is in very poor condition. III. PROJECT BUDGET (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): Post-Completion Est Capital MAY 1997 Project ; Est 1st Yr Est Annual CAPITAL Expenditure % of ; 0 A M Oper/Maint Oper/Maint COST Curr S Intl I Total ; COST Curr S Intl S Curr S Intl S Services: t0 f0 0% ; Personal Serv: $15 $11 $15 $17 Land/ROW: 0 0 0% Supplies: 5 6 5 6 Construction: 1,200 11584 80% ; Maintenance: 10 12 10 12 Equipment: 300 300 20% ; Services: 20 24 20 24 0th 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0% ; Oth 1: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 O% ; 0th 2: XXXXXXX 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (Thous): $19500 $1,884 100% ; TOTAL (Thous): $50. $60 $50 360 s.=eeoe_caczc_cv - ! ss=e=ceceaae=__c -oeee_eececea proof 0 IV. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): YR 1: 1995 YR TOTAL: S1,8B4 % YR TTL: 100% OCT: 1.864 !NOV: 0 ;DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 ;FEB. 0 ;MAR: 0 APR; 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 :JUL: 0 ;AUG: 0 :SEP: 0 , ii -72- 1996 YR TOTAL: s0 % YR TTL: 0 ; 0 OCT: 0 ;NOV: 0 :DEC: 0 ;JAN: 0 ;FEB: 0 'SEP: u APR: 0 :MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 ,JUL: 0 :AUG: YR 3: 1997 YR TOTAL: $0 % YR TTL: 0 MAR: J OCT: 0 :SOV: 0 :DEC: 0 :JAN: 0 ;FEB: 0 :SEP: 0 APR: 0 ;MAY: 0 ;JUN: 0 :JUL: 0 ;AUG: proof 0 V. FCNDING'SOURCES (Dollars to Nearest Thousand): 1Auth h Unauth &; ; ;SOURCE: XXXXXXXX; gold :Unsold Unsold ; Certificate : Operating ; Aid in : YEAR YR Go rSond :GO Bond GO Bond :of Obligation Revenue Const Grant TOTAL SO ; EO ; EO s0 ; 30 1995 s0 so s0 ; a 0 1884 1996 0 1 0 1,884 ; 0: 0: 1997 0; 0 0 0: 0 0 0 i 0 ' TTLS: 30 (1,889 S0 so so 51,884 su so ; ; proof 0 NOTE: ATTACH SITE MAP IF PROJECT INCLUDES LAND, ROW, OR CONSTRUCTION. ATTACHMENT 1 PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING + MONDAY, APRIL 20, 1992 5:30 P.M. SENIOR CENTER MEMBERS PRESENT: Dalton Gregory, Chairman Tom Judd, Vice Chairman Burkley Harkless Catherine Bell Director Municipal and Executive Economic Development STAFF PRESENT. Betty Service McKean, Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation Bob Tickner, Superintendent of Parks Alicia Mentell, Superintendent of Leisure services Coordinator Janet l,s Administrative Planning Secretary Joy Hesch GUESTS PRESENT: Christopher Hall Rhonda Collister, Denton Jaycees David Hiott, Denton Record-Chronicle Carla Pride, Student at TWU Representatives of Township II Neighborhood Association 1. MBETTNG CALLED TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Dalton Gregory, Chairman. ctfn II, 1 PREVIOUS ME_m +S APPROVAT OF MIN 71~~ minutes of the on a motion by Catherine Bell, second of Tom Judd, the roved as written. meetings of March 23, 1992, and April 21 1992, were app For the convenience of the guests present, Dalton amended the agenda to begin with other items. III, OTHER ITEMS of North Texas, a. Christopher Hall, a Ph.D. student at the University available for stated that he had heard o the establishment of a d ee golf course parks, and he wanted toprpose in Denton. He said it would be very cost effective and ii extremely that popular in other other sport such pas tennistandggolf.thIt would attract is necessary in participants of all ages. Dalton asked how much land would be needed for the golf course. Mr. constructed Hall stated that a disc golf course car, bp would not be used otherwise. Another represnntative said normally about five ares is from 1,500 to 6,,000d lfor inear efeet course, It would take an average of one and a half hours to play 18 holes. The only maintenancn required would be mowing and the course can be designed to fit the park. He added that where part3.cipation is very limited on tennis courts, about 90 people can participate on a disc golf course at one time. The is 13hat placed be the same basis as regular o. individual game as0aepaof the rtner is no a always necessary. be played as an ATTACHMENT 11 arks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting ?ril 20, 1992 ige - 2 The cost to establish the course would cost approximately $3,000 for nine holes and X17,000 for an 18 hole course. The cost to an individual to participate is minimal when compared to regular golf. Mr. Hall said the game had also been included in the Pepsi Games. Bob asked if they kn!iw if Pepsi of other companies sponsor courses. Mr. Hall said that it may be possible to get sponsors for the different holes on the course. Dalton asked if there were any others present who would like to speak to the board. Don Leander of Township 11 Neighborhood Association said he would like to make a statement to the Board. Mr. Leander said he had talked with Janet Simpson several timer. with the idea of trying to get landscaping along Piney Creek so that it can be used for walking/jogging/biking rather than having to use the streets in the area. Their suggestions for development would require low maintenance and they have volunteers that would maintain the property. They were asking for funding for heavy equipment to move the rocks, etc. Dalton said that it would seem when rocks are to be moved, it would i involve the drainage. Janet said any development would have to be approved by Planning, Engineering, and Utilities with regard to the floodplain. Dalton asked if the staff has looked at costs involved such as engineering and staff time. Janet said that staff's major concern, as far as developing a trail, was to look at the configuration and available space. To build a trail for public use would require careful consideration and study to make sure the trail met all safety standards and that it was not too narrow and too close to the creek to obstruct the drainage. Mr. Leander said they had considered the drainage and felt it would probably improve drainage. Bob Tickner suggested that Bill Angelo of Community services may be able to do the heavy equipment work. Janet said a meeting should be set up with Mr. Angelo and the neighborhood association. Janet said the next step to take would be to investigate the possibility of securing a donation of land from the bank for a neighborhood park. Dalton commented that it sounded like a great opportunity to work with a neighborhood group. Rhonda Collister of the Denton Jaycees asked the Board to consider the Jaycees request for permission to sell beer at the Just Hoop it Tournament at North Lakes Park the last weekend in May. She said the department would realize approximately $1,000 plus the Jaycees would renovate the volleyba,llIpourts which they had originally installed. information had been provided to Steve regarding the plans for security and liability requirements. Dalton said the request would be included on the next agenda as an action item. irks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting >ril 20, 1992 ige - 3 Tom Judd stated that a packet of information regarding playground equipment had been given to him at the public meeting at North Lakes Recreation Center. The concept was to get the community involved in building and designing play areas as opposed to Parks going out and Putting in a Playground. Tom thought it would be worth exploring. Wood is used in the construction and would have a 25 year lifespan. Bob said that the playground equipment he had observed that was made out of wood does not hold up well in this part of the country. Janet said she was aware of a park that had used this type of equipment and that it may be worthwhile to visit the park and talk to the departments who maintain the equipment. V. ACTIONS IT~SS A. Consider Information Received at Neighborhood Meetings Regarding the Implementation of 1986 Bond Funds. (Steve Brinkman) Steve referred to a memo that had been provided to the Board which was a synopsis of the six neighborhood meetings held to receive citizen input on the remaining $2.7 million in 1986 bond funds. The summary of major points from the meetings is as follows: • Strong support for the acquisition and development of park land, first in South Denton and then in Northeast Denton. • Provide basic park facilities like those at Avondale Park for neighborhood use including playgrounds, trails, picnic facilities, and ballfields, particularly in South and Northeast Denton. • Defer construction of recreation centers until an appropriate level of funding is available. • Support to provide development in areas of the City as approved in 1986 bond prograia. • Maintain facilities properly once they are constructed. Philosophical direction based on input from neighborhood meetings: • Land acquisition that will accommodate future recreation centers is essential in the South and Northeast. • Promote acquisition and development of neighborhood parks rather than at centralized, community-wide facilities. • Basic park development, i.e. Avondale, should be provided at all future neighborhood park sites. • Maximize park acquisition and development through State matc!,ing grants. rks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting ril 20, 1992 ge 4 Incorporation of citizen input from additional neighborhood into Comprehensive Master Plan as it is developed. meetings funds would be: The next steps for implementation of the 1986 bond ugh Denton and • First, investigate availability of land in south identify appropriate tracts for park development. igate availability of land in Northeast. Denton and r Second, invest ark development. identify appropriate tracts for p Acquire land for park use after approval from Park Board and city council. input for • Conduct additional neighborhood meetings to solicit south and Northeast Park Site Master Plans. July of 1992 • if land is acquired, submit grant application in Y to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department for park dev feasible. where deemed Other major considerations include: be most • Renovation of civic center Pool ($1,000,0o0) may effectively addressed through other funding sources to insure a prompt response to this need. If funding is requested o osed, any construction could a matching grant as originally Prp season. In addition, swi not be actualized until the lwould bemingcompetition with other any application for the p expects to submit for park development grants that the City South and/or Northeast Denton. Bonnie Brae • creation of a new ropad in North Lakes Park accessing eeognixed as a in the northwest ortion of the park to alleviate traffic ) problems in that neighborhood ($130,000 significant issue although itDis not Identified for funding in 00 the current N lakes Park . North RRenovati r o is Dania highlighted by critical Lakeneeds wasimum of per r cent ) ace and equipment to properly conduct the the inadequate ap .neighborhood meeting at North Lakes. • IncreaAed maintenance of current park facilities. • Expansion of amenities at existing neighborhood parks to provide facilitietl similar to the Avondale Par development. the statement Dalton asked the Board members if they felt accurately represented the tone of the meetings. .rte 4 irks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting )ril 20, 1992 ige - 5 Tom Judd said he was speaking as one who had attended all the meetings and the statement sounded very close to his perception of the meetings. Burkley had attended the meeting at Wilson and what he had heard at that meeting was the need for park land in South Denton. Catherine said she had attended one meeting which was at Wilson Elementary and had heard the same as Burkley. She asked how long it would take to acquire the land. Betty said the City would need to inventory what land is available, investigate the purchase prices, receive direction from the Park Board as to an appropriate site, and then enter into negotiations. Steve said that is a priority, and if the Park Board and Council approves it, work will begin soon on the acquisition of land. Burkley asked if money for land was included in the bond issue. Betty said that money for land acquisition had been included in the bond but not as a specific line item. An amount of at least $200,ooo had been suggested for land acquisition as a part of the two recreation centers development. At the time of the bond election, staff had hoped that land would be donated as sites for the centers. This was at a time when there was strong development in the area. Dalton said it was hio understanding that the Park Donation Policy would be used as a part of the platting process. Betty said the City has a Development 11,eview Committee. When someone is planning a development, all the key members of the departments who have something to do with the development work with the individuals who are putting the development together. In the course of the discussion, they are supposed to identify an appropriate ratio of park donated policy relative to the site development. There have not been any major developments since the Park Donation Policy was put in place. Dalton asked if a development had to be so large before the policy would'take- effect. Steve said.the policy gave the City the ability to ask for land or fees in lieu of land based on the size of the development. Bob said the policy gave the developer a choice of giving fees in lieu of land based upon one quarter of one percent of the construction value. That is due upon payment of building permit fees. Bob stated that this was optional. Dalton asked if any money had been received and what was meant by optional. Bob replied that the policy was not mandatory. rks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting ril 20, 1992 ge - 6 In developing the policy, Betty said staff had worked with developers over a period of several months at which time the developers had been very vocal regarding the park donation being voluntary. Throughout the process, the developers insisted that if staff could work with them that the City would get much more land through a voluntary park donation policy than would be realized on a mandatory basis. Betty said that it was unfortunate that this came at the time of the downturn in development. Bob said that if land had been secured through a voluntary policy, it could be used for a matching grant. If the land had been received on a mandatory basis, the state would not consider it for a matching grant. Dalton said his sense of the input received at the meetings was to stick with the concept of the bond package of developing two sites, one in the south and one in the northeast. He recommended putting in boldface print the last paragraph of the memo from Steve to the Board which refers to the Park Donation Policy. He also recommended requesting a maintenance crew in the 1992-93 to handle any new acreage. It was recommended that an amendment be included in Item I of the memo in the third bullet statement. it should read, "Defer construction of recreation centers until an appropriate level of funding is available for construction and operation and maintenance.„ In addition, restrooms should be included as a basic park facility in Item I, bullet statement 2. Tom moved that the Park Board recommend the Parks and Recreation Department move ahead with the staff recommendations if approved by Council. Burkley seconded the motion, and the motion was passed with a unanimous vote. Dalton suggested that the minutes of the neighborhood meetings, copies of the newspaper articles, and the flyers be included in the backup which is to be provided to council. He. said he believed that a comprehensive effort was made to inform the community, to develop a dialogue, and in the long run, a lot of light was shed on the issue. He also said that he appreciated the major effort of the staff in all the preparations for the meetings. DISCUSSION ITEMS None. T. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS None. CI. A JO The consensus of the Board was that the meeting should be adjourned. .n I> 11 IJ R A N U U 11 - lu; tietto Plckean, tixecutlvo 011eeGeC Municipal Services/Economic Development r Kuhl : IVonie f 1a ! o-Kul 1 , (tanager Environmental Health Services N 11F'+ 1'E: June 1, 1y52 Subj: Cjvlt: CEIII'ER PARK SwIMMINU PUOL A review of the Environmental Health Division's records show that the swimming pool at the Civic Center Park has always been in compliance with the standards set For public swimming pool maintenance, CHLORINE RESIDUAL: The maintenance of Free chlorine residual In the pool at all times will prevent the start or z1gae troubles, fhe Free chlorine residual should be at least 1.0 ppm, The Civic Center Pool has had a Free chlorine residual of between 1.U and 3,U each time it was inspected, pH: (hydrogen ion concentrations) Uptimum coagulation, disinfection ant swimmer comfort depend upon maintenance of a Draper pH level, [he pH of pool water should be above /,0 with an optimum level of '/.d, Testing of the Civic Center Fool has shown reading of b,ti tO 1,b, bJi: Acid (can be irritating to eyes! /,0: Neutral /,d: Ideal range, chlorine at maximum erFectiveness /,b: Satistactorg, but less effective range For chlorine /'B: Chlorine eftectivensse decreases rapidly, even when present in proper amount the swimming pool at the Civic Center Park genarallg falls within tiJe guidelines, on the rare occasion when the reading has been at the outer range of the acceptable levels corrections are easily made with the adjustments occurring within a feu) hours CLARITY: Increased turbidity in a pool duce to algae is not only esthetically objectionable, but creates a hazard to proper swimmer supervision, Our inspection reports show no records of a problem with clarity at the Civic Center Pool. ALGAL CONTROL: Once algae obtains a "tae-hold" in the pool the maintenance of a chlorine residual is diFfimult and may foster bacterial growth, Our records show no problem with algae at the City H001, SKlM1'IEKS ANIJ OASKEIS: these devices, used to trap unwanted debris, have been clears and in working order each time the pool has been inspected by Environmental Health. information you 1 will be nappy to provide any additional might need, ATTACHMENT III T ~ PROPOSITION NO. 1 , 1990-1991 s,I••ETS/TpJWSPCRTATION/TPAFTIO CONTROL Fort. Worth Drlvo/James street 5_34.944 Drainage 1986-1987 $ 450,000 53,466,000 Lllllan Hiller Parkway Widening 230,000 Turn Lanes Upgrade Traffic Signals at Carroll 170,000 Boulevard and tlnivsrsity Drive 165,000 Nam signal Installations 64,000 pROposITION NO-3 signal at Loop 288 and U.S. 380 25,000 EIpANBIONI Traffic Study 40,000 ANIMAL CONTROL CENTER Evers park sidewalk 15.000 1986^197 Sidewalk on Hercules $1,139,040 slan . Animal Control Center ExPan I-MAN 1987-1988 S 185,000 Woodrow Lane Widening and $ 625,040 TOTAL Improvements 450,000 PROPOSITION No. 4 Rebuild Existing 51'1•1 Avenue TIRE STATION AND EQUIPMENT (with present &I%9=ent) 250,000 Mingo Road Traffic and Drainage 1988-1989 ~Op Improvements 200,000 Firs station Teasley Lane Imp_o amnization 75,000 lire equipment Traffic Signal Sy 21, m 700,000 Traffic signals $1,525,000 TOTAL ( PROPOSITION N0. 9 1982-1989 $ 250,000 ATMXTIO YIELDS /NEI4RBOH00D Y.H.2181 (Teasley Lads Your Lana ANY, SENIOR arrIZEN CENTERS Divided From IH-35E South to , 1966-1987 Ryan Road rcvement■ 50,000 $1,200,000 Dav • Street paving lop East Recreation center I Avenue E Improvements (Eagle Drive 40,000 Athletic Field' DeVelOPrent $1,250 000 I to IH-35 Service Road) „ $ 340,000 1987-1988 $ 750,000 1969-1990 Senior Cents' Expansion 550,004 ' $1,300,000 Loop 208/Loaal Partloipation, Your $2,200,000 Athletic Yield Development Lane Divided From U.S. 3BO South 1222-2989 to Colorado Boulevard 600,000 $1,300,000 U.8.380/Local Partiaipatlan~ Six Recreation Center Lane olvided From tl.8. 77 (Locust) Athletic Field Duvalepment $1,550 to Loop 285 500,000 'Expansion of Nottingham (Free 1990-1991 U.S. 380 to Hinge Road) Acquisition 250.000 $1,400,000 D.B. 380 Right-of-Way Acqu S3i560,000 Recreation center 450, Athletic Field Dewlopmenti, 61,850,000 1990-1991 $5,950,000 Fort worth Drive (U.8> 377)+ Your $1,065,000 TOTAL Lane Divided From I8-35E to PROPOSITION N0. 6 F,H. 1830 117,000 HEHTS Reconatruat ion of Oriole atrast 61,1820000 LIBRARY IMPROVE $7,736,000 1989-1969 6 400,000 TOTAL Library Expansion, Phase 1 1490-1991 Lon Completion of Library Rxpane+ 000 PROPOSITION NO. 2 ' DRAINAGE TOTAL 51,0001000 1986-1987 $ 300,000 PROPOSITION No. 7 pOHPL4X Taylor Park Drainage 250,000 LAN rMRCF.MNT CENTER/ Woodrow Bridge 110,000 1988-1989 pecan Creek Drainage 90,000 200,000 Audra Lane Drainage 64'000 piing for Law Enforcement center/ S gurninq Tree Drainage 60,000 court Complex Stuart/selena Drainage 1922-1990 study Drainage Regulations $ 889,000 $ 500,000 Law Enforcement canter/Court 1987-1988 Complex, Phase I $ 337,000 1990-1991 Willow Spring' Drainage 250,000 Malons Street Drainage 150,000 Comp?.ation of Law Enforcement gurniay Tree Bridge 50.000 C~Jntsr/Court Complex Teasliiy Lane Drainage $ 787,000 TOTAL $2,600,000 1985^1989 S 425,000 Update Hacker Drainage Plan 1989-1990 , S 625,000 Loma del Rey Drainage 350,000 Stuart/eunnydala Drainags Drainage improvements in Holly H111 Area 61,2~075~'000 ATTACHMENT IV June 3, 1992 1986 Capital Improvement Program Proposed Expenditure Summary Teasley Lane Property - 200 acres (Future Site for Recreation Center) Land Acquisition $ 5001000* Land Development 5001000** i North East Park (Future Site for Recreation Center) Land Acquisition 200,000 Land Development 250,000 TOTAL DEVELOPMENT COSTS $11450,000 i I AVAILABLE BOND FUNDS $ 831,850 CURRENT BALANCE 618,150) REMAINING BONDS TO BE SOLD $ 1,8501000 ~ 618.150 BALANCE AFTER DEVELOPMENT $ 1,2310850*** * Total funding for this acquisition has not been determined. This total does not include a $500,000 matching grant for which the city will make application for on July 31, 1992. Park Board has recommended approval of this grant application. A resolution will be submitted for City Council approval oi, June 23, 1992. To be reserved for future recreation center development. MLK Center construction costs in 1988 totalled $1,300,000. AJJ003B3 w - ~ i ATTACHMENT V CITY Of DE'AMON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINKY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Massager ~ FROM: John F. MCGrane, Executive Director of Finance DATE: June 4, 1992 SUBJECT: GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS AND INTEREST There are several areas that regulate the sale and use of General obligation bonds. They are Federal Legislation and Regulations, the State constitution, State Legislation, City Charter and ordinances and bond covenants associated with bond certificates. With regarda to the use of proceeds from the sale of general obligation bonds, the primary regulations governing those areas are Federal Regulations and bond covenants. In 1986, Congress passed legislation directly aimed at limiting the amount of arbitrage that tax exempt organizations could realize with the sale of bonds. In essence, arbitrage is the investment of proceeds at a higher interest rate over the actual payment of tax exempt interest. For example, if the City sold a million dollars worth of bonds at a seven and one-half (7 1/2x;) percent interest rate and was able to invest those proceeds at a nine (9%) or ten (lot) percent rate of return, the City would realize income because of its tax exempt status. In 1985, the City sold $10 million worth of general obligation bonds. Since these bonds preceded the 1985 Legislation, arbitrage was not an issue. There is a bond covenant that states the bonds will be used for the purpose of acquiring land and making improvements for public purposes. In audition, it states that it is not expected that any of the proceeds of the bonds be used in any manner that would cause such obligations to be arbitrage bonds under the internal Revenue Code. Much more flexibility exists with the 1985 bonds than does with the 1985 bonds. The 1986 Comprehensive Bond Program utilized a staggered bond sale for the program. All of the bonds associated with the program would be sold after 1986 and would be subject to the federal arbitrage regulations. 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 r Memo to Lloyd V. Harrell June 4, 1992 Page 2 In general, there are a number of covenants that relate to the arbitrage regulations and subject the bonds to those restrictions. The one that concerns the immediate issue presented to Council is that investment earnings should be used for the purpose for which the-, bonds were sold. Proposition #5, passed in 1986, authorized the issuance of $5,95 million park improvement (athletic field and neighborhood and senior citizens community center) bonds. It would be a matter of interpretation whether the swimming pool improvements could be considered part of the athletic field and neighborhood and senior citizens community centers. In my opinion, based on the wording of the proposition and the wording of the campaign literature outlining the program areas, the swimming pool improvements would fall outside the bond project definition. It is my understanding that a number of options will be presented to City Council that may accomplish the task without having to make that interpretation. If you have any questions regarding any of above please advise. AFF002AC