Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-04-1992 j n,a^nda Nn. /J.P----. AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL August 4, 1992 6 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, August 41 1992 at 4:00 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the fo.. -)wing items will be i I considered: c NOTE: Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may also be considered as part of the Agenda for the Regular Session. 4:00 p.m. 1. Budget Presentations 4:00 - 4:10 Introduction 4:10 - 4:50 City Services General Government Legal Municipal Judge Planning & Development 4:50 - 5:20 Dinner Break 5:20 - 6:05 Finance Administration Purchasing/Warehouse Treasury Operations Treasury Tax Municipal Court Customer Service Accounting & Budget Operations Information Services 6:05 - 7:00 Municipal Services Parks & Recreation Library Environmental. Services Municipal Services/ Economic Development Facilities Management Human Resources Regular, Meeting of the City of Denison City Council on Tuesday, August 4, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: City of Denton City Council Agenda CEs August 4, 1992 Page 2 7:00 p.m. 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Presentation of Keep Texas Beautiful Awards. 3, Public Hearings,. A. Hold a public hearing to consider the preliminary and final replats of portions of Lot. 2, 3, 41 5, and 6, Block B) into Lot 6R, Block B of the Schmitz & Ripy's Addition. The .4128 acre site is at the southeast corner of Bell Avenue and Schmitz Street. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval, 5-0, at its July 8 meeting. The preliminary replat was recommended conditionally,) B. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance rezoning .4128 acres from Multifamily (MF-1) to General Retail, (GR-C). The land is located on the southeast corner of Bell Avenue and Schmitz street. (The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval, 5-0 at its July 8, 1992 meeting.) Z92-015 C. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance amending Specific Use Permit No. 201 on property zoned Light ]Industrial for the purpose of expanding the Denton County Jail Facility by constructing i four dormitory type detention housing units. Tho property contains 21,97 acros and is located on the west side of Woodrow Lane, approximately 350 feet south of McKinney Street. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval, 4-1, at its July 22, 1992 meeting,) Z-92-016 4. Consent Agenda Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the staff recommendations. Listed below are bids and purchases orders to be. approved for payment under the ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back- up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda it,nm 5,A) . This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss or withdraw an item prior to approval of the + c w Alp; ,i!a ili'nl City of Denton City Council Agenda August 4, 1992 Page 3 X,6 Consent Agenda. Upon receipt of a "request to speak" form from a citizen regarding an item on the Consent Agenda, the item shall be removed and be considered before approval of the Consent Agenda, A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. P.O. #23767 - Alan Nelson Architect . i 5. Ordinances A. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City,. Manager to execute an agreement hiring Alan Nelson Architects for, professional consulting services in I connection with listed building maintenance and construction projects, (4,A.1. - P.O. #23767) B. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving the retainer of the law firm of Henderson Bryant & Wolfe to represent I the City in pending litigation styled i?,~tul Ti1phu u v. i y of Denton. C. consider adoption of an ordinance approving settlement and release in Wiinterrowd v. Casteel.gt a1. D. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending Chapter 27 of the Code of Ordinances by the addition of Article V thereto establishing an Emergency Medical Subscription service; providinq for procedures and authorizing charges therefore; and establishing membership fees, E, Consider adoption of an ordinance contracting with an auditing firm for the City of Denton for the year ending September 30, 1992, " F. Consider adoption of an ordinance naming a public park. (The Parks and Recreation Board recommends approval.) 6. Resolutions A. Consider approval of a resolution appointing Tom Harpool to the Board of Directors of the Texas Municipal Power Agency. B. Consider approval of a resolution temporarily closing the 100 blocks of West Oak, North Elm, West Hickory and North Locust Streets from 6:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. on Saturday, September 19, 1992 for "County Seat Saturday". I ~ 1 M~ar,d•a No. ,~1_~~,,,,~ City of Denton City Council Agenda August 4, 1992 Page 4 C. Consider a resolution regarding the 1992-93 budget of the Denton central Appraisal District. 7. Presentation and discussion of affirmative action hiring for certain classas of City employees and give staff direction. 81 Consider a request to allow the Fred Douglas and Fred Moore Alumni Association to sell. lunches in Fred Moore. Park on " August 8, 1992. (The Parks and Recreation Boa:ed recommends approval.) 9. Consider a request from the North Texas State Fail Association to allow the use of loudspeakers, amplifiers and musical instruments August 24 through August 27, 1992 until 11:00 P.M.,, on Friday, August 21 and August 28, 1992 until 12 midnight; on Saturday, August 22 and 29, 1.992 until 12 midnight; on Sunday, August 23 from 1:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.; and o:, Sunday, August 30 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m, for the purpose of the North Texas State Fair and Rodeo. 10. Submission of the effective tax rate and rollback tax rate. 11. Submission of the certified collection rate. i 12. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. 13. New Business This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 14. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 625217 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate ler Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252•-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Af,,cintments Under. Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. :onsider appointments to the Animal Shelter Advisory Committee, the Downtown Advisory Board, the. Electrical. Code Board, and Library Board and the Planning and Zoning Commission. w ~ I , , T - ..r- rt Q n f r~Ienda Pao %~;,-Q City of Denton City Council Agenda August 4, 1992 •,2~ ~~+ff f _ Page 5 t NOTE: THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT IS LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE. ' I C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the -day of 1992 at -o'clock !a.m.) CITY SECRETARY NOTEt THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IS ACCESSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY SECRE111ARY'S OFFICE AT 566-8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY' CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX SO THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE. ACCOOOA7 i` t r, 1 h ,'CITY. C UNCL ET _ +.r err 'r' .1.......:= 1. + •KlYf - uaOcoon r 4' • l` n \r ~ Imo.. . f .Y .CIA.. - 3 DATE: 08/04/92 CITY C UO NCIL_ kv:;" TO: Mayor and Members of the city Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY 0 BLOCKN BFIINTO RE LOT T 6ROF BLPORTI OCK O BS S AND 6 CHMITZ 2 & 3RIPY I S ADDITION. RE(LOMMENDATION: The Planning of the preliminarynandnfiJuly 8, 1992, neil repl is by ac5-0 mended d approval vote. The preliminary replat was recommended with the condition that an additional five feet of right-of-way be dedicated al^ng the Schmitz Street frontage. SUMMARY s The .4128-acre tract of land is on the southeast corner of Bell Avenue and Schmitz Street, near, the campus of Texas Woman's University. Currently the land is vacant and is proposed for immediate use as a commercial parking lot. Proposed zoning would also eillow certain other small. retail uses. The early as 1 proposed 8, so tract this configuration snot required to be included in the replat. ~ No public improvements are required. The applicant is not pursuing a request to vary the ROW dedication requirement. in or(ler to avoid existing construction will have to meander"future , instead sidewalk paralleling the new ourbline. Currently, the zoning on this tract is for multifamily (MP-1) use, A zoning change to General Retail (conditioned) (GR(C}) has been applied for. "anitary city er, services s electrical,] and facilities, solLd waste, including are avail b.le. sew 34tof Development minimum 12agulations) Chapter of The ubd visa n s and conform S the code of Ordinances. Engineering and Planning and Development Departments LS-rjj7 I P t Addition to the tax base. ti r. r s ti , P I- q4 Page City Council1992or1nat Page 2 lktfn August ! Reap fufl1 aubmitteds Prepared bL 1 9yd. Harrell ` City Manager G. Owen at, ABLA Urban Planner J Apfan i F Robbins AICp Executive Director p Planning and Development 11 E AXX0018D I ~Y ATTAC11MENT 1 All^rld ~1a Mrjn'!d It Q ORTH P`-92.021 Schmitz and Ripy's Addition 45-t-1 a II { 0111' I 0 _ 1 n h'J } 0 ~ Ut eORE_lY,r''t 4. o c- 42i~~'~-~y7f411 F -'Lis Mf ~.L . Sat!° VE9 ~~rVVV/// (FfRSf QI~ i / g4SS1~./~--- \ IYYME 1E%d5 JdK 'I111 of 1g7k:4 S E X A r_ z CENTER = Q VAY J ~ .T ~R. 1 Rel1 , C ~TnnKr a I -f y/Ji gpp i IEuR 4N ~ ~ ~ xOCOFOa~~ /~/J 1 C I~_RS' / _ u _ n d Cis C~ ARA ~ - Est t ( I ~ S OIRBER J i ~ V r ru ^~aerc ~,vT 9 f 2 & '7 l- ~ 9Rnav rF.. 1 uLkHO I .y i.l OeYIS A SAID _._-~~fgf A, ~ t lZ~+- eENI °a C] l f1 LIP p- [,I9AK __j D L-2 L~71~_-J UL~N-- JAENTMN X15 AERAr SY Amu '~1'xl Si /(~7 R MORE R FEIN) to z ]nY,1LUU l u 9rR^E6 _ s / CEMt7ERY -If ;y Y S 1jnL 1. PfialFt Cau'R L +\4- i -/y~ pp 41RI PtUILO!`IU iu U t[[wnRR ( rC K1` J y CEV SE Y-'.._~ \ n9F rte n U ~15YI. 10~ z~~22y~ ,III / F `t~ r r^ -',~t Date: 6/12192 scale: NONE 2 , Y. ATTACHMENT 2 q1 k? r" 1a Flo. -Ole! P-12-021 Schmitz and Ripy's Addition NORTH i 7~ ,.kip;- f Lor a 1) r 3 2 ~OJ V LON. 6R /.i ONED I ~ ryr,rr.wi YrYr..- ~ ~ klF Y fY/~1 w 1 t1F1 PRELIMINARY RE1PLAT Uatet 712!92 5calei HONE ATTACHMENT 3 ~ P-92.021 Schmitz and Ripy's Addition NAo NORTH A-l 4 SCHMI TZ STREET W MNI W .IY f 044W V LOT 6R 1i BLOCK B 1wr, oar YR I Y »L ~ A J u M Mr p'Wr IMM A W ~j-Mf I / i I }.Y{It7 A YY( 7YW YAK 1 I FINAL REPLAT Dow 6/18/92 Scales NONE \r I r I` I ~ ATTACHMENT Q P&Z Minutes July 8, 1992 Page 5 c~t1n _ .lL.._ . dir. Engelbrecht stated that whether this property is used for parking, or for retail, it will generate traffic, It is questionable whether the street is adequate now, The new development will put more traffic on Schmitz and the City may 9 have to look at widening the street. There will also probably be more multi- Eamily in the area in the future, He moved to recommend denial of the variance request. Motion was seconded by ,b(r, Glasscock. Ms, :Morgan said that she agrees with Pyir, Engelbrecht, Mr. Kamman also agreed that the traffic will increase in the future and the dedication would save the City money, ivtotion to deny variance carried unanimously (5.0), b, Consider the preliminary and final replats of portions of Lots 2, J, 4, 5, and 6, Block B, into Lot 6R, Block B, Schmitz and Ripy's Addition. Staff Report: Mr, Yost stated that the ,4128 acre tract of land is on the southeast corner of Bell Avenue and Schmitz Street, It is heavily vegetated. No public improvements are required. Currently, the zoning on the tract is nulti•&„ra9y. A zoning change to general retail (conditioned) has been applied 6;r. The condition will limit tu; land uses. With the recommendation of denial for the variance, staff can recommend approval of the replat with the condition that 5' of ROW be dedicated and shown on the plat along the Schmitz Street frontage, With the condition, the replat would conform to tite minimum requirements of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations, Petitioner; Gary Hammett asked that the plat be approved with the condition of 5' of ROW be dedicated along Schmitz Street. Vice-chairman Kamman closed the public hearing. Motion was made by Mr, Glasscock, seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht, and unanimously carried (5.0) to recommend approval of the preliminary and final replats of the Schmitz and Ripy's Additon with the condition that an additional 5' of ROW be dedicated and shown on the plat, r'` m a 0 1 i . :tom r CITY r C0UNCI: p00ggq00 DD Op0 e P i v. L DATE: C~08/.0~y4//92 ~ t>.jnrda X40..1 j`'!'~-~... _ I CITY COUNCIL REPOT TO, Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager ICJ SUBJECT: Proposed rezoning of .4128 acres, located at the Street, from southeast -family corner l to General Avenue Retail a (conditioned). Multi 4 RECO_~MMNDAT 01' The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (5-0) with conditions on July 8, 1992. SUMMARX: The .128 multi-fanily ruseT. ac No public is currently vacant and is zoned for BhCKGROUND: stoy being in P&Z considered report. on the same gis land Council agenda. See Hi FROGMG• DEPAF_3_TMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Engineering Departments Planning and Development Department 1,15CAL IMPACT: increase to the potential tax base. Respectfully submitted: A h Lloyd V. Harrell Pre ed by. City Manager G. Owen Yost ASLA Urban Planner Approved: 4ka FrH. Robbins AICP Executive Director Planning and Development E AXX001©C/2 4 t t; PLANNING AND ZONING +10Y14ISSION R£POR3'" ~ To: Mayor and Members of the City Council i case No.: Z-92-015 Meeting Dates August 4, 1992 " GENERAL INFORMATION Applicants Hammett & Nash Co. Mr. Gary Hammett. P.O. Box 1552 Denton, TX 76201 current owners Conine Capitol Company Mr. Doyle Conine P. 0. Box 627 Denton, TX 76202 Requested Actions Rezone a .4128-acre tract from Multi-family One [MF-1] to General Retail (Conditioned) (GR(C)]. Location and Sizes A .4128 acre site located near the Texas i Woman's University campus, on the southeast corner of Bell Avenue and Schmitz Street. surrounding Land Use and zonings f North - The right-of-way of Schmitz St., across from which in an existing apartment building in MY-1 zoning. South - An existing apartment building in MF-1 zoning. East - An existing duplex in MF-1 zoning, West - The right-of-way of Bell Ave,, across from which is a T,W.U# classroom building and a student parking lot in MF-2 zoning. Denton Development Plans Moderate Activity Center r r. j ~iJ Cl~d;3 i~0. Case No. 2-92-015 1.t to = C1r 3+...! August 4, 1992 SPECIAL TNFORMATTON G Transportations i The proposal of a commercial parking lot will help alleviate the current parking problem in the area. Since the subdivision , regulations allow no driveway access to Pall Avenue, the traffic situation at that point will not be aggravated. Access to the site will be via separate entrance and exit drives on Schmitz Street. Utili.tieat There is a 6-inch water line on Schmitz St., and a 12-inch water line on Bell Ave. There are also 6-inch sewer lines on both Bell ind Schmitz. All are adequate for the proposed zoning. There is an existing fire hydrant on the northeast corner of Bell s Schmitz, No additional hydrants will be needed to serve this site. Electric service is available from Schmitz Street. Drainages Drainage from the site currently goes into gutters on Bell and Schmitz. Also, the recently-constructed drainage improvements on vine Street help handle the run-off water. The proposed uses will require nothing more, although uses that are not listed, or uses requiring a specific use permit, may require additional consideration. HISTORY The land was formerly the site of a single-family home, whioh burned down, and was demolished, several years ago. Currently the site is vacant except for many mature trees and other growth, it is currently zoned for multi-family use, permitting one- to three, story apartments. Much of the nearby land is under state control. Page 2 r i i/!O CIII!e. !f 0. Case No. Z-92-015 August 4, 1992 .ANALYSIS The .4128 acre site is in Intensity Area No. 50, which is 35% allocated. r ! Intensity Area 050 allocates 350 intensity trips per acre. The proposal would require 268.32 intensity trips (.4128 x 650). This h is greater than the 144.48 (.4128 x 350) allowed by the Penton Development Ilan. According to the plan, if a proposal. violates the policy of proportionate share, as this does, a determination should be made I of any planning considerations that might warrant approval of a disproportionate allocation of i.ntennity trips. The following items should be considered: a, The location of the proposfr,d development in reference to existing or proposed public facilities such as streets, water or sewer lines, and drainage facilities. The property will only have access to Schmitz 5t, and none to Bell. Water and sewer lines along Schmitz and Bell are adequate for the proposed use, and existing drainage Facilities will handle water runoff from the site. Thus, this policy is complied with. b. The topography of the land in the planning area and in the proposed development. The site has a large amount of protected trees. These treeet help create the character of the area, No major modification of the natural drainage patterns is warranted, either. In keeping with these statements, the applicant has agreed to conditions which will preserve a large portion of the trees. Thus, this pol.ioy is complied with, c, The land use in the planning area and in the si.irroundi.ng areas, The surrounding land uses are mainly multifamily. To the west, however, is it T.W.U. classroom. building and student parking lot. The area, therefore, is imbued with character by t}gin University. A commercial parking lot, or other small retail P•."e 3 ~ J ti k 1 , Case No. 2-92-015 1V1 / 7 August 4, 1992 ANALYSIS - Continued use, would not have a negative impact on this:. character. Rather it would provide a public service. Clearly, there is a need for additional parking in this area, and the proposal would take vehicles off the public i>treets. Thus, this policy is complied ' with, d. The allocation of trip generation intensity in reference to other policies of the Plan. All of the allowed uses in cR zoning include many that are incompatible with the character of the neighborhood. These incompatible uses have been excluded from the proposal, leaving a list of uses that would not negatively impact the area and would blend with the existing neighborhood. Also, one of the goals of the Denton Development Plan is to "promote land use diversity to encourage housing and community facilities in close proximity to employment centers." This is in keeping with the stated form for it Moderate Activity center. Thus, this policy is complied with. Staff observes that this proposal complies with A, B, and D, and a disproportionate share of intensity trips is therefore warranted. RECOMMENDATION A The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval, with the following conditions: 1. The floor-to-area ratio (FAR) of any structure shall not exceed .3 to 1. 2. The height of any structure will be limited to two stories 3. Existing vegetation of 2-inch caliper or greaten located within 20 ft. of the Bell, Ave. right-of-way, within 14 ft. of the :Schmitz 5t, right-of-way, within 1.5 ft, of the southern property line, and within 10 ft, of all ether property lines, will be preserved In a healthy condition. Page 4 C i' 'e i. I H ~4)ernla P!a Case No. Z-92-Q18 ~~d`~~u'slt m._ August 41 1992 [)Al RECOMMENDATION - Continued ` 4. The building line paralleling the southern property line will be 15 feet. ° 5. Allowed uses will be limited to: Commercial (surface) parking lot Antique shop Bakery or confectionery shop (retail) Cleaning & pressing, small shop & pick-up GUJtOm personal service shop Dormitory or rooming house Drapery, needlework or weaving shop Florist or garden shop Greenhouse or plant nursery (retail) Handicraft shop Hotel or motel Household appliance service & repair Institute of religious or philanthropic nature Laundry or cleaning, self-service Museum or art gallery Mimeograph, stationery or letter shop Offices, professional and administrative Public library Retail stores and shops studio for photographer, musician or artist Plus, the following uses will be allowed with an approved specific Use Permit: Restaurant Animal Clinic (inside runs) Fraternity/sorority house C Page 5 i i. y ` Ei i ,r kl18RRi1H0~~~r-r J. 1 gand1 mY--. A - CdBS~ !!o. 8-92-015 A d r~ ~ August 41 1992 7.,... ALTERNATYVR9 a 1. Recommend petition 2. Recommend petition with additional conditions 3. Recommend denial of petition 4. Delay consideration ATTACMUNTS 1. Location Map 2. Metes and bounds description 3. Intensity Area No, 50 4. P&7 Minutes of July 8, 1992 meeting. Page 6 C i C i t A ATTACI MIENT 1 y _ 1 ~ Schmitz and RiPY's Addition NORTH j Fo~~S~ZY j + I ! / l~ swj, LJL~~c~,ql - I'll UO U I -]OCHW.Y. 380 J V) TWU 0 CAMPUS i o TWU c0_L FGE J I, GGLF C9UA9F - / o a f WAOt n IRn OD / LFTYNOAE I` Q1f1 ~ ilf ~SAW-I YER CFM11 _ / - -~~1RIRE( L_ FIRST1II ii CJ -1 J l R A 17- J ~ Ilr - ITY IC%F$ J '(jAY~~ MEADC)ROA L V~y r ~ X~ S YICE J . _ FEPG- ¢ TEXAS Gt.NTER rtANN (7 o f_ > 9C MkR. z - _ - - [ - _ f4~S~ ~ D Pau- r M-kLL c~Q > 1 0 LIIiF 1I~ w iyq I uJ w l10~E~ ao J i r- {Ir I L I' S ` L~ f11R aN_ S woooFOR~ ii __If 1 11 ` a L 1 IA LIBRAi' CE:_NIER CA -No II iJ DAVIS rl$?~ V KENT Mi d C__ - - OAK _ _DAK [ u^K.1 CKORw JAIL ❑ GAL - I- JAIL OENIUN R15 x 111 \ IIC-'' COMPI A_ ~ jBERRY o i ~ ~ a . _ 1 Q OA1: aL0!J l q l_10UU - - z N / CEMET_ERV ~ [ T~ . C 1.7.7T E - - 7 - =WFENT OJ1 w Y L, J Ck Date: 6/12/92 Scale: NONE } 1 ATjL002CC 1 ~1~~enda llonL_ _ L„)._ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING R A CHANGE FROM MULTI-FAMILY ONE (MF-1) TO GENERAL RETAIL (GR) DISTRICT CLAS- SIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION WITH CONDITIONS FOR 0.4128 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED NEAR THE TEXAS WOMAN'S UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BELL AVENUE AND SCHMITZ STREET; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Hammett & Nash Co. has applied for a change in zoning for a 0.4128 acre tract of land from Multi-Family One (MF-1) to General Retail (GR) district classification and use designation with conditions; and WHEREAS, on July 8, 1992, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the requested change in zoning; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the change in zoning will be in compliance with the Denton Development Plan; NOW THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS, SECTION 3. That the zoning district classification and use designation of the 0.4128 acre of land described in Exhibit .A, attached to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference, is changed from Multi-Family One (Mr-1) to General Retail (GR) dis- trict classification and use designation with conditions under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION II. That in accordance with ordinance No. 91-078, the property shall be subject to the following conditions: A 16 The maximum floor-to-area ratio (FAR) of any structure shall not exceed .3 to 1, 2. The maximum height of any structure will not exceed two stories or twenty-three feet (231). 3. All existing vegetation of a two-inch (211) caliper or greater located within twenty feet (201) of the Bell Avenue right-of-way, within fourteen feet (140) of the Schmitz, Street right-of-way, within fifteen feet (151) of the southern property line, and within ten feet (101) of all other property lines, will be preserved in a healthy condition. 4. The building line paralleling the southern property line will be fifteen feet (151). ,Y E~ . r ,i t` J ' //J ...._mar//..,. 5. The allowed uses for the property are showw4n `(of permitted uses attached hereto as Exhibit B and +/:L' ch is incorporated herein. SECTION III. That the City's official zoning >7ap is amended to show the change in zoning district classification. SECTION Iy. That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding j $2,000. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offenae. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the city Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be , published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTESTt JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: _ a APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY C Page 2 C f , } ~s Agenda Pdo ~ _r _C!U r LIST OF BXHISITO 1) Exhibit As Description of Property - 1 page i 2) Exhibit B% List of Permitted Uses - 1 page 41 A) . ii !-1 EXHIBIT A ~1r r aU~nda tdu LJ FIELD NOTES TO 0.4128 ACRES IN THE B.S.B. AND C.R.R. COMPANY SURVEY ABSTRACT NUMBER 185 CITY AND COUNTY OF DENTON, TEXAS. ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE B.B.B. AND C.R.R. COMPANY SURVEY ABSTRACT NUMBER 185, CITY AND COUNTY OF G DENTON, TEXAS, AND BEING PART OF LOTS 2, 31 4, S, AND 6, BLOCK 8 OF SCHMIT2 AND RIPY'S ADDITION AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF DENTON, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 85, PAGE 270, DEED RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. 4 BEGINNING AT A STEEL PIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 61 BLOCK 51 SAID CORNER BEING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SCHMIT2 STREET WITH THE EAST LINE OF BELL AVE.; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINU'T'ES 00 SECONDS EAST WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SCHMIT2 STREET A DISTANCE OF 210.00 FEET TU A STEEL PIN FOR CORNERI THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 65.47 FEET TO A STEEL PIN FOR CORNERp THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO A STEEL PIN FOR CORNER; THENCE SOUTH WITH A FENCE PART OF THE WAY A DISTANCE OF 25.U0 FEET TO A FENCE CORNER POST FOR CORNERT r k THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES OU SECONDS WEST WITH A FENCE PART OF THE WAY A DISTANCE OF 170.00 FEET TO A STEEL PIN ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 6, AND ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID BELL AVE; THENCE NORTH WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 6, AND WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID BELL STREET AVE A DISTANCE OF 90.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 0.4128 ACRES OF LAND. r i }t /5~!rnBa X20 r-' RA~jer!r19 71Bfli~--- ; _ ~-(,11r; f EXHIBIT B 1J_ T OF PER91 TED _JaRs 1 Commercial (surface) parking lot Antique shop Bakery or confectionery shop (retail) Cleaning & pressing, small shop & pick-up Custom personal service shop Dormitory or rooming house ~r Drapery, needlework or weaving shop Florist or garden shop Greenhouse or plant nursery (retail) Handicraft shop Hotel or motel Household appliance service & repair Institute of religious or philanthropic nature Laundry or cleaning, self-service Museum or art gallery Mimeograph, stationery or letter shop Office, professional and administrative Public library Retail stores and shops Studio for photographer, musician or artist in addition the following uses will be allowed upon obtaining an approved specific Use Permit: Restaurant Animal Clinic (inside runs) Fraternity or sorority house " k 5p _ t f - _ F I d 1;~2nr~;it~o. ~.ni 9- fi.tiurula list-} P&.2 Minutes July 8, 1992 , Page 6 ✓ y C. Hold a public hearing and consider the rezoning or .4128 acres from Multi- family 1 zoning district to a General Retail (Conditioned) district. i Staff Report, Mr. Yost stated that the .4128 acre site is located near the Texas Woman's University campus. The applicant intends to build a 4 commercial parking lot. Currently, NIF-1 uses are allowed. Adjacent land uses to the north and south am apartment buildings in MF-1 zoning, To the east is a duplex in MF-l zoning; and on the west is a TWU classroom and parking lot in MF-2 zoning. Mr. Kamman asked about the surface of the proposed parking lot. t Mr. Salmon said that it will have to conform to the Subdivision Regulations. Mr. Kamman asked if the drainage will be changed. Mr. Salmon said that the drainage runs towards Schmitz and then down to Vine. In general, the grade of the parking lot will need to slope towards Schmitz Street. Mr. Yost stated that the intensity of the area is 3501o allocated so there are sufficient trips available for the proposed zoning. A 15 foot setback is proposed to preserve the existing vegetation. Mr. Robbins explained that in general retail zoning the setback is usually 10'. 15' is being suggested as a condition in order to protect the vegetation, Mr, Conine stated that he looked at the property and determined that a parking lot would be ra good use. There are around 250 cars in the neighborhood on a daily basis and the lot will relieve some of the congestion, He originally wanted 55 spaces but that number has been reduced to 35. The lot has been planned around the vegetation, It will be an asset to the City and should get an award. 99% of the trees will be protected. Only 2 will be lost and one of therm is diseased. This parking lot will take some of the strain off of the neighborhood. People may use the free street parking up first but I he is planning to offer reserved parking and is hoping that people will lease space on a monthly basis. They will be competing with the free parking which is why they need additional latitude. The Planning Department has excluded many general retail uses, He can live with that and asks for the Commission's ti i ra tl ~ P&Z Minutes 15 July 8, 1992 Page 7 approval of the request. Recommendation; Mr. Yost stated that staff recommends approval with the following conditions; 1. The floor-to-area ratio of any structure shall not exceed .3 to 1. 2. The height of any structure will be limited to two stories. 3. Existing vegetation of 2 inch caliper or greater located within 20 feet of the Bell Avenue ROW, within 14 feet of the Schmitz Street ROW,' within 15' of the southern property line, and within 10' of all other property lines, will be preserved in a healthy condition, I 4, The building line parallelin,t the southern property line will be 15'. 1. Allowed uses will be lirnited to; Commercial (surface) parking; lot Antique shop Bakery or confectionery shop (retail) Cleaning & pressing, small shop & pick-up Custom personal service shop j Dormitory or rooming house Drapery, n.Tdlework or weaving shop Florist or garden shop Greenhouse or plant nursery (retail) Handicraft shop Hotel or motel A I Household appliance service & repair Institute of religious or philanthropic nature Laundry or cleaning, self-service Museum or art gallery Mimeography, stationery or letter shop Offices, professional and administrative, Public library Retail stores and shops Studio for photographer, musician or artist C 'v .j H, 7,77 in 7 : .Y1 771 P&Z Minutes July 8, 1992 [btu ~ ~-yPage 8 ~A6 Plus the following uses will be allowed with an approved Specific Use G Permit; Restaurant i Animal Clinic: (inside runs) Fraternity/sorority house 4 Vice-chairman Kamman closed the public hearing. Mr. Engelbrecht moved to recommend approval of Z-92.015. Motion was seconded by Ms, Morgan and unanimously carried (5-0), V, Confider the removal of protected trees for the purpose of replacing culverts under i Hobson Lane between Montecito and Santa Monica Drives, Mr, Salmon stated that the existing metal culverts under Hobson Lane west of Montecito Road and east of. Santa Monica are in extremely poor condition. Emergency repairs have been m-tde twice in the past six months. The det,lgn process has been fast-tracked and plans are to bid a new box culvert immediately, The new culvert will be larger and about 20' longer than the existing ones, This will allow for expansion of Hobson Lane in the future. Also, there will be adequate concrete and rock rip rap installed at each end of the culvert to retard the erosion problem that has caused the existing culverts to fail. There are two protected Chinaberry trees on the south side of the road that will need to be removed in order to construct the culvert as planned. One is on the east side of the culvert and is 10" in diameter. This tree appears to be about halt' dead. The other is on the west side of the culvert and is about 18" in diameter. A Chinaberty tree is related to a Hackberry. Property owners were contacted. One is not opposed to the removal of the trees and the other did not reply to either letters or t;aephone calls, Presumably, they have no objection, He asked the Commission to look favorable on the removal of the trees. Mr, Kamman asked if this project could be done without the removals. Mr, Salmon said that the culvert could be shorter but then they wouldn't be able to widen Hobson and they might have an erosion problem, The sidewalk will remain as it is. A portion will be removed rind rebuilt, Hobson will eventually be four lanes with sidewalks on each side. I ` f s~ c~ I T Y ~tCOUNCI: J- a - ~1 _Y~• I -4- 1 i .L. .y O }r •~~w y nO '1 i bA ~J a r 4 r• V Y. T t /.gyp hi .:Hly}, 3 I DATE: August 4, 1992 CITY COUNCIL REPART h x[(10 ht0. _ 0 - - TO. Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager AV' ~LI i SUBJECT: Z-92-03.6 Amending SUP 201 - County Jail Expansion RECOMMENDATION; ~ I The Planning and Zoning Commi9sion recommended approval (4-- 1) at their meeting of July 22, 1992. SUMMAR . This is a request to expand the Denton County Jail Facility by constructing four dormitory type detention housing { units. BAS:KGROUND : See F&Z Report. PROGRAMS, LIE RThfENTS OR GROUPS ,AFFECTE Denton County -FISCAL IMEALCT: N/A Rospe,.fully submitted; Prepared by: I,1 yd V. Harrell 7 " City Manager y=K-~s 1 K ren K. Feshari Urban Planner Approv luw - .4 ra k H. Robbins ,;ICP Executive Director Planning and Development AXXOO:IBC f sf >.'I a PLANNING AND ZONIN!1 COMMISSION REPORT t To. Mayor and Members of the City Council Case No.s 7.-92-016 Meeting Dates 08/04/92 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicants Denton County I 110 W. Hickory Denton, TX 76201 (Honorable Joff Moseley, County Judge) Current Owners Same Requested Actions Amend Specific Use Permit No. 201 on property zoned Light Industrial for the purpose of expanding the Denton county jail facility by constructing four dormitory type detention housing units. Location and sizes A 21.97 acre tract of land located on the west :side of Woodrow Lane approximately 350 feet south of McKinnoy Street. , Surrounding Land Use and Zonings North - General Retail; vacant South - Single Family 7, City of Denton Animal control building East - Light Industrial; and MF-1; vacant, and single-family residential, and apartments West - Light Industrial (C); vacant Denton Development Plans Low Intensity Area I ti~ I C 4 Y. a~ iP xt i~ a ~ D~prnla Plo. r ~y Ft~1unU .uom. t~.~_ Tj Planning and Zoning Commission Report f~la Z-92-016 August 41 1992 SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: Additional public improvements are not required as the property has already been platted. The Engineering and Transportation Department suggests that the County petition the Texas Department of Transportation to use their maintenance crew to widen the pavement on r* McKinney Street from Woodrow Lane to Jeannie Street so that a westbound turn lane may be added at the jail entrance. No additional driveways on Woodrow or McKinney Street will be permitted. it appears that the existing drive approaches will be used which is acceptable. utiV'ties: Water Water service will be provided by the 20 inch water line on Woodrow. Sewer Sanitary sewer service is available from thy, 12 inch sewer line on Woodrow. There is an existing 24 inch sewer line traversing this site. The line as well as the easement; must be abandoned prior to issuance of any building permit. 1 The request for abandonment is the responsiblity of the applicant. Fire There is a fire hydrant located on Woodrow in front of this property. Fire flow is adequate, Construction of Luildings must comply with the Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire Code, 1985 Edition, Section 87-103, The building must be fully protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system and must comply with the city of Denton Ordinance 91-065, except where the state has imposed a separate regulatory scheme in regard to the fire protection. Fire sprinkler plans must be approved by the Fire Marshal, Page 2 i 4 k l V 1 y' ~~,rltla No. . OgonO,111eoL Planning and Zoning Commission Report 42Io a-92-osu . Augaat f, 1992 SPECIAL INFORMATION Electr k Electric service is available. r HISTORY This tract of land was zoned Light Industrial in 1989. shortly after this rezoning case, the City Council approved an amendment to the zoning ordinance requiring correction facilities to have an approved Specific Use Permit. On April 7, 1992, the City Council approved the case of. Z-92-008, a specific use permit for the expansion of the jail. On July 22, 1992, the Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval of Z-92-016 (4-1). ANALYSIS Although this property is located in a low intensity area, a disproportionate share of intensity was allocated with the zoning to LI. Property owned and used by governmental agencies must be analyzed differently than properties owned by private entities. According to the city legal department "the power of the city to regulate the use of county-owned property through its zoning power 4 is limited." This opinion was determined because the Texas Attorney General has ruled that political subdivisions are immune from the Municipal zoning power subject to "a rule of reasonableness.' The Legal Department believes the City probably could not prevent the County from expanding the use of the property for County purposes unless the City could show that use of the 1 property would be unreasonable. c Page 3 .ti ( 41 t 1 A tit~:nda No. f Planning and Zoning Commission Report Z-92-016 Ct31~i_L~ ~L-7~ AUgust 4 f 1992 ANALYSIS - Continued t The applicants submission has shown on a site plan all of the technical data required for review of a Specific Use Permit, The request is for expansion of the existing facility by constructing four dormitory type detention housing units. Each dormitory will be 3,465 square feet and one story in height. Staff's opinion is that the expansion of the jail is no more intense of use than most uses allowed in the Light industrial district. Therefore, it does not appear that the use of the land would be unreasonable, 111 RECOWENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of. Z-92-016 ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition - 2. Approve petition with conditions 3. Deny petitic -i 4. Delay Consideration ~ ATTACHMENTS ~ 1. Location Map 2. Current site plan, approved April 7, 1992. 3. Proposed Site Plan 4. Memorandum to City Council dated 2/28/92. 5. Draft copy of minutes from P&Z meeting of July 22, 1992. AXX00114 `Y t Page 4 ti i vvumy %oorractional raciiity r n'1PACHMf.NP 1 f~~~ n~~•~~~J, tom`" ct,+, NORTH a° J 17- Yet I I/ ~r.~ H• r '3 [I~P 41$ Y ~ ~ C~.~ PAISLEY a >4 I I ~HR AiV s Eli 1! i w....OR w, Y CT, U 8ER CHAR- I d!q r 3 7 J LONOFtppQpy 11 o odws ADD Q® T ~ t I~RMINCJ C NNE1Y 1~j K OAK F. M. 426 HICKORY a y o eERRr ~ ~ SITE a) srcA- ~ I L J I CEtaEl ERY ; I R C) a PRA! 0 r 1r / ~ 3~It fR£6 MO(IR PAq ~ r, 1 " 'SON W ~ 2 F r ~ 1r MORSE 7G r~ i 1t 9/31/01 SCALD: MOWN - _ -T Will I +i 1 A9'TACHMGNT 2 lr,.~da No. A~fenda II~r,L ~ p~ y c, oil S I - I + I ; ~ I I I : A, i f ill' i .~1+ 1 j ~ - ~ h~ II h~~l II G~~ { .rte d ~ , i II I I lryry1^^ll'•~ , I Y 11' I 1~ I ,I KI I j 1I - I li' 1 1~I' I ' I II I r l i 1 ~ i 91 I I gIIt 1i I ;lilt SI l1~. ~ ~ I~1 I i ~p I h____~~i r Y +o -~I AI OITION TO 7NA LX STUANU SANTOPURO ARCI41[ww CTS, INC. OMN'TON COUNTY IAIt. MCw4CIW1 heulnNC ''o ~ wM nuwV1 RINION 11'NI ' MII II.-4YIIp. 111,1 l/111 NY r 1 ~S ,t r ATTACHMENT 3 1 I'1 \ ~ I A.r~c:I~IJa Hem III t 1 I I Ic r~,p:;.~l .I 1 1 I I N - 4 ~ f I. i Rr- 1 , I111 I 1 b -~i~~ iI 1y ~Y I D .il w.L~.r T V~ I I 1 y 1 I II _ J ~{4 --'~T,TTTTTTi1TT1 ~ ~ I = umlLwjijl rU- Jilll ID f ~ _,p ► I I I Itil. f/ l 1 lIIII 1 II I i i n P&Z Minutes ,+?panda f:b,~ July 22, 1992 Page 2 the 10.18 acre tract. Ms. Morgan questioned the drainage improvements which w l b conducted by the 'texas Department of. Transportation and whether or not this would take care of the drainage detention pond which is currently east of the Gonetics Center. Ms. Feshari indicated this would be eliminated upon the completion of the drainage improvements, 1 Petitioner: The petitioner was present to answer questions. 9 No one was present to speak in favor or opposition to the request. Recommendation: Mrs. Feshari stated the Development Review committee recommends approval as the final plat conforms to "A the minimum requirements as set forth in the Subdivision and Land Uso Regulations; Chapter 34 of the Code of Ordinances. J A motion was made by Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Fran Morgan to recommend approval of the final plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Loop 288 Addition. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). _l- V. Hold a public hearing and consider amending Specific Use Permit #201 on a 21.97 acre tri.ct of land, known as the Denton County Jail facility, on Woodrow Lane for the purpose of constructing four dormitory type detention housing units. 1.8 property owners were notified within a 200 foot radius of the tract; Zero were received in favor and one was received in opposition. Ms. Feshari indicated that upon reviewing the responses from the previous case when the jail was considered, she discovered the person who sent in an opposing letter had originally been in favor of the facility with no comment. Ms. Feshari called the respondent with Amwest Savings Association of Dallas, and he indicated the marked opposition was inadvertently done and that, if needed, he would fill out another form indicating chat he was in favor of the SUP amendment. Staff Report: Ms, Feshari reported this request is for the expansion of the Denton County jail facility for the purpose of constructing four dormitory kype detention housing units on the property. Each dormitory will be 3,465 square feet, one-story in height. The tract of land was zoned Light InJ.ustrial in 1989. Shortly after the rezoning case, the City Council approved an amendment to the zoning ordinance requiring correctional facilities to have an approved Specific Use Permit. Jn April 7, 1992, the City Council approved the case of. Z-92-008 which was a specific use permit tor the expansion of the jail. Since this tame, Denton county has determined an additional need for more housing , because of the overcrowding situation and has requested this / amendment to this recently approved Specific: Use Permit for the dormitory type housing. I 1 . I P&Z Minutes July 22, 1992 Page 3 Ms. Feshari reviewed the city of Denton's role when another M governmental entity has a zoning request. The property is in a low intensity area. In the backup, a memo from Joe Morris, former Assistant City Attorney, discussed the authority of cities regulating other governmental entities and part of that included the Attorney General's opinion that political subdivisions are immune from the municipal zoning power subject to "a rule of reasonableness". The City's legal department t>elieves the city could not prevent the County from expanding the use of the property because there is no proof of unreasonable use of the land. Ms. Feshari stated all the site plan information that was submitted meets all the technical data requirements of a specific use permit. She expressed the staff's opinion that the expansion of the jail is no more intensive of an use than most uses allowed in the Light Industrial districts. No one was present from Denton County to speak as petitioner nor was anyone present to speak in favor of the amendment to the Specific Use Permit. i Opposed: E. C. Hilliard, resides at 113 Wocdrow, Denton, stated that he also owns property at 103, 109, and 113 Woodrow. Mr. Hilliard stated he is approximately 40 feet from the jail and voiced his concern for placing additional dormitories because of the noise factor of the existing facilities and the problem of not being able to sell his property because of its close proximity to the jail. He also expressed the problem or the lack of restroom facilities for those lining up to visit inmates, Mr. Glasscock indicated the Commission sloes not have much choice in the issue because of the opinion of the Attorney General. Mr. Engelbrecht stated the Commission could direct the staff to look into the issues of noise and health issues. Willie Hudspeth, 316 N. Ronnie Brae, Denton indicated he is planning on building a home, just south of Mr. Hillard's property on the other side of the creek where the new elementary school will be built. Mr. Hudspeth questioned why the Commission is considering the item if the County could build the facility with or without the City's approval. He continued by expressing his concern for the noise and the potential rroblems of residing so closely to the correctional facility. Mr. Hudspeth emphasized that he was speaking on behalf of himself and not the Hoard of DISD on which he is a member. No others were present to speak in opposition of the case. Staff recommended approval of 7-92-016. of Mr. Engelbrecht asked for reiteration eiteration of the legal. issue \ c r. s j A P&Z Minutes fge2+fa 1lem 1 July 22, 1992 Page 41 Pill) the case. Ms. Feshari reviewed the legal issue of tl,b <e'i~/ considering the "reasonableness" of the project. There was no one present to speak in rebuttal of the 1 opposition. Dr. Huey noted that there were two very diverse ~ considerations in review of the case. one is the continuing problem of the overpopulation of the jails and the need for additional space. Other considerations are the concerns for the residents and the question of the location of the school. A request. She lso, there is the consideration of "reasonableness" in the the students who indicated that t atshe was tending inclined e school and toward residents of the area. Ms. Morgan question DISDIs involvement in this case. Ms. Feshari stated that DISD was not within 200 feeti therefore, were not notified, nor has any staff member heard anything from DISD in reference to this case, Mr. Engelbrecht asked if the staff could contact the County regarding the health issues. Mr. Robbins responded that the staff will address those issues with representatives from the County. Mr. Engelbrecht asked for a motion. Dr. Huey moved and Fran Morgan seconded the motion for denial of Z-92-016, Mr. Glasscock asked for clarification of what this denial meant legally. In making her motion, Dr. Huey stated it was her intention that the commission go on record as thinking this is a unreasonable use of the property. Mr. Robbins brought out the City council has the final authority on this specific use permitt Planning and zoning commission is only making a recommendation. Mr. Robbins brought out that in talking with some of the county Commissioners, the health issue of additional restrooms has to do with wh.11 they need more room. The lack of restrooms art-4 a result .af the ovf rcrowding issue. These additional dormitories bring requested will alleviate overcrowding problems, and the County feels this kind of construction will save the taxpaysirs money. The motion to deny Z-92-026 failed 3-2, with Messrs. Glasscock, Engelbrecht and Willis voting against denial. Motion was made by Mr. Glasscock and seconded by Mr. Willis to recommend approval of Z-92••016 with stipulation that the County Commissioners will be notified of the present situation and improvements be made to address the situations G, r P&Z Minutes July 22, 1992 Page 5 L that were pree,ented by the neighbors. Mr. Engelbrecht emphasized the importance of haven the grade school in the area and the situations that seem to be arising should be addressed. He continued by stating that this public hearing process allows these issues to surface so that they can be batter managed, allowing all parties to operate efficiently. t The motion to approve Z-92-016 passed by a vote of 4-1, with Ms. Morgan caiating the opposing vote. VI. Hold a public hearing and consider amending the boundary of PD-26 to encompass 2.794 acres. The site is east of Newton a { Street and approximately 580 feet north of Morse Street. Staff Report: Mr. Yost stated that approximately 1.18 acres are being recommended for rezoning from PD-26 to SF-7. The reason for this is because of a land swap between the Denton Independent School District and ALICO. The land swap will enable to the proposed elementary school to be located in a more apropos location. 17 notices of the public hearing were mailed; no written replies were received. Mr. Yost indicated there would be no changes to the water, sewer, or electric utilities in place now. No change to the natural drainage patters of the ALICO site. The natural drainage to be concrete ,:'iich will be northeast to the site. This proposed land swap between DISD and ALICO would allow the school to be built without costly redesign and ALICO's driveway would be relocated approximately 50 feet to the north and would be paved to city specifications. The intensity trips would not vary a great deal; the trips for the current PD-26 have already been allocated and are in the development plan. Any fluctuation in intensity trips would create only a very minor change in the allocation status. Staff recommen'.,.d Z-92-017 with the condition that any trees or protected t;•-.es that are removed for the driveway or for any other reasca would be replaced by four canopy trees of at least. 211 caliper. This condition was not written in the staff report but Mr. Yost stated it was part of the staff recommendation to the Planning and Zoning C!=mission. Dr.. Huey asked if there would be a requirement to come back to the Commission if there war, removal of any protected trees. Mr. Yost stated no since this was a staff function. Petitioner: Bill Coleman of Coleman and Associates surveying represented the petitioner, D.I.S.D. Mr. Coleman stated this action would bring the legal description of PD-26 in r, a i r, 1 E ALL002EI n~~nr,t~~ rlo. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING A S1? CIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE COUNTY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ON 2;1.97 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF WOODROW LANE, APPROXIMATELY 350 FEET Z SOUTH OF MCKINNEY STREET; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. I WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 92-053, the City Council granted a { County oof Woodrow LTexas ane;,and ° of permit (No. 211©97 spciZic use WHEREAS, the County of Denton, Texas has applied for an amend- ment to specific use permit No. 201 to expand the County dJail site etention for the purpose of constructing four (4) dormitory-type housing units; and WHEREAS, on July 22, 1992, he Planning Zoning Commission recommended approval of the proposed WHEREAS, in accordance with Division 4 of Article III of Chap- ter 35 following conditions nexist tas tottheoamendedapermit: that the of 1. That: the use will be compatible with and t sinjurious to the use and enjoyment ofother pertywithin , t ig immediate diminish or impair property values vicinity; 2. That the establishment of the use will not impede the orderly development or improvement of surrounding vacant property; and other adequate utilities, access 3. Thai: facilities have been or drainage be provided; a 4. That the design, location, and arrangement of all driveways and parking spaces provide for the cafe and convenient movement of vehicular and, pedestrian traffic without adversely a.ifecting the general public or adjacent developments; 5. That adequate nuisanco prevention measures have been or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise and vibration, if any; 6. That directional lighting, if any, will be provided so as riot to disturb or adversely affect: neighboring properties; and hharmony and compatibility with adjacent properties, NOW,r ensure THEREFORE, r. %i 1i Fi tic, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the specific use permit approved by Ordinance No. 92-053 is amended by the adoption of a new site plan, attached to this ordinance as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by refer- ence. Exhibit B shall replace Exhibit A of ordinance No. 92-053, and this property described in ordinance 92-053 shall be developed, used, and maintained in accordance with Exhibit B as attached hereto. SECTION II. That a copy of this ordinance shall be attached to Ordinance No. 92-053, to show the amendment herein made. SECTION III. That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, bo fined a sum not exceeding $2,000.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. SECTION IV, That this ordinance shall become effective four- teen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary { is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in thee Denton Record-Chronicle, the official, news- paper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the 1 date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992, BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: - APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY VZ J ' 1 Page 2 '4 1 i! ~C ITY CC~UNCE o~ooa~aaaoooo~o~n OOD i N .rj~ 1 a O .a t d ' 1 OO r o ,v, t o +~~J- ~ - . Y {1 C C A,ICrcI1 A(jf1I'J'J I IIOf(0 ORDINANCE NO. q c/ AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT i HIRING ALAN NELSON ARCHITECTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH LISTED BUILDING MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCII. OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute an agreement hiring Alan Nelson Architects for professional consulting services in r;.+~ connection with the listed Building Maintenance and Construction Projects. SECTION II. That the expenditure of funds therefor as set forth in the { agreement is hereby authorized, SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective Immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992. BOB CASTLEBEI RY,NIA.Y0R ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOViTCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: DATE: 8-4-92 f CITY COUNCIL REPORT ~'Oend3 No. TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Ilan l.l:fo FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager 11 ~j" Zk--~C C SUBJECT-. PURCHASE ORDER #23767 - ALAN NELSON ARCHIT Cv 1 RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that Purchase Order #23767 to Alan Nelson Architect be approved as presented in the amount of $21,500.00 SUMMARY: This purchase order is for Architectural Services on a list of proposed building maintenance and construction projects. The projects were approved, along At. with Certificate of Obligation funding, during the 1991-92 budget preparation process. All of the approved .projects will not require architectural services. Only those projects where the use of a professional architect would add assurance of quality and value are Included In this proposal. Each phase is a separate list of projects and any phase can be eliminated or cancelled at anytime prior to start of work. If individual line Items are deleted an amount of deduction would need to be negotiated. Phase One has been completed or is in progress. Architectural Services are recognized as "Professional Services" and exempted from the bid process by the Law of the State of Texas. BACKGROUND: Purchase Order #23767, Proposal from Alan Nelson dated 6-29-92. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS _AFFECTED: Citizens of Denton, Facilities Management, and Alan Nelson. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for the Professional Services are Included in the Certificate of Obligation sale for Building Construction Project9. Funds balance for account #995-032-BLDG-9225-8502 Is $30,950.00. Respec ully submitted: ~Llo d Harrell City Manager Approved: X n Name Tom D. ahaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent agenda.295 c. Y. F Cr r v or L)EN I LW I EXAS THIS IS A PURCHASE ORDER NO: F C 2:1 161 CONFIRMING ORDER A r x This number must appear on all (IF MARKED) involcas• delivery slips, cases, DO NOT DUPLICATE tins„ boxes, packIN 8109 and bills. e Date: C? 1 i S., Page No. d 1 No: Bid No; PURCHASING O1VlSION /9018 TEXAS STREET /DFNTON, TEXAS 76201 n{I'ndd 110, - / OA 8171383-7100 D/FINMFTRO8111267.0042 FAX 817/302 Ct .4692 (C (fT Rem~~ n Ah ht:LSCN DELIVERY CCNFInMATICh CALY 2 N GAK FACILITY NGNT N'10 TESS ADDRESS 321 C. MCglt•NCY D NTCN TX 7L2,1 DEh70Ns TX 16201 q E17-666-3266 J~ DELIVERY QUOTED 07 10, 92 FOB " DESTINAI10N TERMS lENDORhlO. NEL50040 i 1.400 1.Qg0.vS0 1 7A4C.000 33 VI:NppCCqq.CAT. A N A MFG•;NAM E CiIY / 9()117 EICDLNG SPECS CONSTRUCTION,8EAV F Pf>GJEC1 MANACEM NT DENIA FLOUPs VISUAL ARTS.MINDOM- NVIO SCHULII• FCLICC .4/C• CIVIC CENTER AICs 0AS COhVERSIUN,SCNIDN CEhTEAr VISUAL ARTS PARKtNG LOT* VISUAL, ARTS LIGHTING l MFG NAME i.1S40 751)•Lr. ' i 2 75C•000 EA VE`OCR CATvA N / A rHA;l3 II• ICL►ET PARTI1ICN5'AEPLACEN~NI 3 48CC.000 IiA. VEhI)CR CAT. A N / A MFG NAIVE . ( IIY 0 9()117 FIIASL 1119 SGUht) SY'iTEtl#CITY HALL SIGHT RI NliVA11Gh•AAM1~ A 2EO.Ct' MFG NAML I•Uufl 64 A 9 BG+000 LA Ve(11Y XA46117 N./ A PHASE IVsCIV1C CENT41t pGNOVATIOh. AIRPURT PARKING LOT* 1 CIVIC CENTER PAfiKING LOTS CITY HALL SIOkMALKSs'FiHti STAT1Ct, 44FAF ' 11CCF AT POLICc 31ATICN9 F0rJ11'ReNCV,ATICK AT AEC• CCNTER:is CA'FETiI` I¢ • PAGL TCTAL Ct,at:.~ G1'.AFS "ILTAZ 21 .z aa:; 5~.~ c.T.~c ~a~5 u.•~a 1,sot,.aa CHIT INSTIt'JLT':~NI3 - T_.Y_ 3.7erms -Net 30 IUNossotheh a smcmed'I rd ulyioal ktwlce with diyu'• kilo co; 4. Shipping Inslrwtions: FOB. Destinatlon prepaid i lnpae oina(Yr,ae SWilled) ii to Ak,uoul'h i'nyaue S. No federal or state sales I0A shall be included 2ib E. McKinney in prices billed. i7anlon, T% 700 ! w Se, r, i l i. ERFIIBIT A ALAN F, NELSON . CIO, o A R C; H I T E C T Agorda NO. . June 29, 1992 r;Ai---- t Bruce Henington, Director, Facility Management City of Denton 215 E. McKinney ° A Denton, Texas 76201 FE: Additional Deferred Maintenance Projects Bruce, In reference to our conversation last week about the proposed list of construction projects, I have reviewed and reorganized these projects Into phases as requested, and Identified my proposed fee for work In each phase. Most of these fees are established from an abbreviated percentage of the cost, but on several of the smaller projects of limited service I only anticipate a few hours of time for review and cool dinatlon. By organizing similar projects Into larger packages, I was able to reduce the total fee. I have also categorized each project Into afferent areas of antfoipated service. As I expfained to you during our meeting, my desire Is to provide you wff.i whatever scope of service necessary toward project completlon. On each project we will as a minimum: 1. Assist In soliciting bids, review of bids, and recommendations concerning potential contractors, 2. Provide coordlnatlon with any contractors or constructs,,)n manager In tho execution of the project. A 3. Provide any drawings, specifications, or other documentation a,~ : rlay be necessary to define and establish the scope of work for the purpose of bidding and construction. I look forward to working with you on these projects. Should you have any questions about this proposal, please feel free to give me a calf. Sincerely, JN6 Atan F, Nelson Architect AFN:cn Al.C~lIIEC?Ef?c p F An;IVPy 1drr.R' :?Li':'GGI 502w C !,v Li 1,JICN TEAS vii; a!] c ~A ^16, r. 1lln``~ ! i1 (l 1 1 CITY OF DENTON DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PROJECTS Agenda Ns.C~_. NE 29, 1992 A!landa !tan . _ JU PHASE ONE (Authorized under P,O, Number 23767) 1. Denla Floor Replacement Bidding Phase 6. Visual Arts Windows in Progress 10 Nette Schultz Tennis Courts Completed q' 8. Police Radio Room A/C In Progress 1 9. Civic Center A/C Under Construction 30. Gas Conversion . Sr, Center In Progress 3. Visual Arts Center- Lighting In Progress { 25. Visual Arts Center-Parking Lot In Progress 4 PR P D FEE; $ 7,000.00 PHASE TWO, h, Toilet Partitions Replacement Civic Center Library City Hall PROPOSED FEE $ 750.00 PHASE THREE 31, Sound System - Councll Chamber 38. City Hall Light Renovatlon City Hall Ramp PROPQUP FEE; $ 4,500.01 ng f_Q_Up 7. Civic Center Renovation ^ 17, Airport Parking Lot I/ 25. Civic Center Parking Lot 26. City Hail 81dewaiks 6. Fire Station #4 Parking 14, Roof at Policy Station 37. Roof Renovatk'on at Rec. Centers 39, Carpeting PRQfQSED FEE,, $ 9,250.00 TOTAL ALL PHASES; 21 50209 (Numbers relate to items identified In January 16, 1992 City of Denton Updated Project Llst) G if Y. kAEslld1 ~a0. ,QaeA Ar~wi(l 1 em CONSULTING SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND ALAN F. NELSON ARCHITECTS The CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, a home rule city situated in Denton County, Texas, hereinafter called "City", acting herein by and i through its City Manager, together with Alan F. Nelson Architects, hereinafter called "CONSULTANT", hereby mutually agree as follows: I. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES CITY desires to contract with CONSULTANT for consulting services in connection with building maintenance and construction 100 projects. II. ~ CONSULTANT'S SERVICES CONSULTANT shall render services necessary for the development of the projects as outlined below. In the course of performing the duties enumerated below, CONSULTANT agrees to assist CITY's Facilities Management superintendent, and other CITY personnel. as may be required. CONSULTANT's duties shall include the following: j 1. Assist in soliciting bids, review of bids, and recommen- dations concerning potential contractors. 2. Provide coordination with any contractors or construction manager in the execution of the project. 3. Provide any drawings, specifications, or other documenta- tion as may be necessary to define and establish the scope of work for the purpose of bidding and construe- + tion. III. TERM OF AGREEMENT CONSULTANT shall commence rendering services upon execution of this agreement. This agreement will continue to be in effect until all terms of the agreement have been satisfied. c:_ E. 1 A r, hjr nda No.. ~ M,Acoda IIE nom.~• TV. COMPfsNSATION TO BE PAID CONSULTANT CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT for the service.' performed here- under as follows: A. Services performed by CONSULTANT in connection with Exhibit "A", the attached latter of June 29, 1992 will be compensated by CITY as set; forth in the letter, which is hereby incorporated into this agreement. "A" performed by CNSULTANTas outside the B. scopeiofaExhibit services 1. Amount of payment for services: CONSULTANT will charge the CITY on the basis of actual professional time spent. Payment for ser- vices will be based upon the rate of Seventy Five Dollars ($75.00) per hour for time expended by principals and Twenty Five _ Dollars ($25.00) for time expended by associates. C. Dates of Payment: CITY will pay CONSULTANT within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice from CONSULTANT. V. SUPERVISION AND CONTROL BY CITY It is mutually understood and agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT that CONSULTANT and all subcontractors are independent contractors and shall not be deemed to be or considered employees of the CITY, for the purposes of income tax, withholding, social security taxes, vacation or sick leave benefits, worker's compensa- tion, or any other City employee benefit. CITY shall not have supervision and control of CONSULTANT or any employee or subcon- tractor of CONSULTANT, and It is expressly understood that CONSUL- TANT shall perform the services hereunder at the general direction of the City Manager of the CITY or his designee, f PAGE 2 w A n 4 S Agr,ni II[~m fLlrr `1_ VI. SOURCE OF FUNDS /Jx All payments to CONSULTANT under this agreement are to be paid by the CITY from funds appropriated by the City Council for such purposes in the Budget of the City of. Denton Certificate of Obligation Funds Building Improvement Program. VII. ° INSURANCE CONSULTANT shall provide, at its own cost and expense, any and all insurance necessary to protect CONSULTANT in the operation of e~ its business, VIII. INDEMNIFICATION CONSULTANT shall and does hereby agree to indemnify and hold harmless the CITY OF DENTON from any and all damages, lass or liability of any kind whatsoever, by reason of injury to property or third persons to the extent directly and proximately caused by the error, omission or negligent act of CONSULTANT in the course of the performance of this agreement, and CONSULTANT will, at its cost and expense, defend and protect the CITY against any and all such claims and demands, Ix. CHOICE OF LAW AND VENUE This agreement shall be governed by law of the State of Texas, and venue for its construction and enforcement shall lie iv the courts of Denton County, Texas. X. CANCELLATION CITY AND CONSULTANT each reserve the right to cancel this Agreement at any time by giving the other party fourteen (14) days written notice of their intention to cancel. If the Agreement. is canceled before completion, the CITY agrees to compensate CONSUL- TANT for, services provided and expenses incurred prior to notice of cancellation. PAGE 3 i l - ~a ji IZy, ~ p Aflq'03 tJo~ !~~en Hem_ XI . SEVERABTLITY CLAUSE If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this Agreement, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this agreement, and the parties hereby declare they would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. EXECUTED this the day of , 1992. a CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS t ~l BY., LLOYD V. HARRELL-_ CITY MANAGER ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY A BY. ALAN F. NELSON ARCHITECTS, CONSULTANT BY: TITLE:----- DATE : corg ank.e:en PAGE 4 C r" .j CITYRME, = M~COUNCI] -r - r ry~ L Qaoo~ UUL L ~ooo Q~~ i N r ADO o ~D F 1 r. u b t \ (1 t \hbupauU . ord /a.7 A 7 Rill) ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON APPROVING THE RETAINER OF THE LAWFIRM OF HENDERSON BRYANT AND WOLFE TO REPRESENT THE CITY IN PENDING LITIGATION STYLED PAUL IWUCHUKWU V. CITY OF DENTON, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the Council of the City of Denton approves the retainer of the lawfirm of Henderson Bryant and Wolfe to represent the City in the pending litigation styled Paul Iwuchukwu v. City of Denton. SECTION IL. That the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor., for payment of services to Henderson Bryant & Wolfe at its normal billing rates to the City. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of August, 1992, BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: C, Ai ti. ;j .!Itl 1444- - l e I CITE' COUNCII Y i.lP r ~IJyr.~-_• :XT vooaoaaoo~o= 000 ° ~ 000 p~OQti { ro ro~OO 00040000 r ° N S e oO~~~..F!y_ . Iti~r MY r.~.W y~ .rl fir. Xrr - e of%wp7docs%wintfset.D PAO _L 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING A SETTLEMENT IN THE MATTER OF WINTERROWD V. CASTEEL, ET AL; AND DECLAF;ING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: 1 SECTION I. That the attached Compromise SetlP,nent and Release of All Claims in the matter of winterrowd y, Casteel, et al, providing for the settlement and compromise of the litigation now pending between the parties in the United States District Court for the Fastern District of Texas, Sherman, Texas, Civil Action No. 4:92CV85 is approved in accordance with its terms. SECTION II. That this ordinance shall become effective immedi- ately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992. r BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WA11VERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: i i' A r~ is "i ~i 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT'~Pld4I',p, ' FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AgcWd 1legt) SHERMAN DIVISION JEFFERY WINTERROWD * [✓1e ` V. * CAUSE NO. 4:92CV85 PAUL CASTEEL, BOBBY RAY, MICHAEL JEZ, THE DENTON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, and THE CITY OF DENTON 4 COMPROMISE BETZL~Et tF1NT 6 LE BE OF ALh, CLAIMS 1. FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the SUM of TWELVE THOUSAND AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($12,000.00) in hand paid this day in cash, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, JEFFERY WINTERROWD, Plaintiff, does hereby release, acquit, discharge, and quitclair unto PAUL CASTEEL, BOBBY RAY, MICHAEL JEZ, and their respective employees, agents, insurers, and attorneys, and those in privity with them, and THE CITY OF DENTON, and its past, present, and future elected officials, officers, employees, agents, insurers, and attorneys, and those in privity with them, (all collectively known as the Released Parties), whether named herein or not, all and each of them, of and from any and all actions, causes of action, claims (including subrogation claims, claims for contribution or indemnity-as to money paid in connection with this settlement, claims under the survival of action statute (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §71.021, etc.), claims under the wrongful, death statutes (Tex. Civ. Prac. &.Rem. Cade §71.001, etc.)), and demands, f on account of or in any way growing out of any and all negligence, conspiracies, intentional misconduct, wrongful claims ha,.ndling, violation of constitutional or statutory rights, breach of any duty 2q-9 \ r it A r I ~~ntl~j hJO. of cod p9nnda l m ` q faith and fair dealing, fraud, breach oftiff intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress, personal` + injuries, damage to reputation, pain and suffering, grief, bereavement, loss of consortium and companionship, damage to familial relationship, mental anguish, psychic injury, loss of L earning capacity, loss of household services, loss of wages profits and money, damage to and taking of property, punitive damages, attorney's fees, pre- and post-judgment interest, and all other causes of action and damages whether known or unknown and whether heretofore asserted or not, connected with or resulting from the incident in question which occurred on or about October 11, 19910 (all as more fully described in Plaintiff's pleadings on file herein, to which reference is made for a more complete description) or from any litigation yr from this settlement. Plaintiff agrees to defend, indemnify and save harmless the said Released Parties of and from all further claims, (including subrogation claims), demands, costs, attorneys fees, and expenses arising cut of any injuries and damages sustained by him or by his respective natural or adoptive family members or relatives as a result of said incident in question, or any litigation or this settlement. 2. The Plaintiff understands and agrees that the amount paid under this agreement is in full satisfaction of all injuries and damages arising on account of the above described events and that he will receive no further sums of money therefrom. The Plaintiff agrees to not assert or prosecute any further claims or lawsuits therefore against anyone whomsoever, whether or not herein or otherwise named, described or identified. Any and all claims ~v t 1 I` a 1 1 lq) r.,xJa ~Jo. ,4!_T AAgencla of good faith and fair dealing, fraud, breach oD10c intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress, personal "d o injuries, damage to reputation, pain and suffering, grief, bereavement, loss of consortium and companionship, damage to familial relationship, mental anguish, psychic injury, loss of c earning capacity, loss of household services, loss of wages profits and money, damage to and taking of property, punitive damages, attorney's fees, pre- and post-judgment interest, and all other • i causes of action and damages whether known or unknown and whether heretofore asserted or not, connected with or resulting from the incident in question which occurred on or about October 11, 1991, (all as more fully described in Plaintiff's pleadings on file herein, to which reference is made for a more complete description) or from any litigation or from this settlement. Plaintiff agrees II to defend, indemnify and save harmless the said Released Parties of I and from all further claims 1 (including subrogation claims), demands, costs, attorneys fees, and expenses arising out of any injuries and damages sustained by him or by his respective natural i or adoptive family members or, relatives as a result of said incident in question, or any litigation or this settlement. 2. The Plaintiff understands and agrees that the amount paid under this agreement is in full satisfaction of all injuries and damages arising on account of the above described events and that he will receive no further sums of money therefrom. The Plaintiff agrees to not assert or prosecute any further claims or lawsuits therefore against anyone whomsoever, whether or not herein or otherwise named, described or identified. Any and all claims Igo ~ I f i c t' J against parties not specifically released herein, aiTd%,y _ hereby assigned in full to the parties hereby release 3. Further, JEFFERY W'I.NTERROWD expressly warrants that t -erg' are no outstanding unpaid hospital liens, medical insurance subrogation claims, or property damage subrogation claims and it is i expressly understood and agreed that JEFFERY WINTERROWD has already paid or will pay out of the aforementioned sum of TWELVE THOUSAND AND NO/10n DOLLARS ($12,000.00) all property damages and medical, doctors' and hospital charges received in the past or to be incurred in the future and that JEFFERY WINTERROWD will defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the said Released Parties, of and from the payment of such subrogation claims and hospital liens (especially with reference to any liens under the Texas Hospital Lien Law). i 4. JEFFERY WINTERROWD expressly warrants that his spouse, if he has one, has not suffered any loos of consortium as a result of the events in question or JEFFERY WINTERROWD's alleged injuries and damages. JEFFERY WINTERROWD also expresElly warrants that no member of his family has suffered any psychic injury, mental anguish and/or damage to the familial relationship as a result of the events in question or as a result of JEFFERY WINTERROWDOs alleged f damages and injuries. JEFFERY WINTERROWD agrees to defend, hold harmless and indemnify the Released Parties from the payment, and for the defense, including, expenses, and reasonable attorney's fees, of any and all such claims for loss of consortium, psychic injury, mental anguish and/or damage to the familial relationship. ur.--aTgM 3- r yi ~i J J A 5. It is expressly warranter) by Plaintiff that no prim4m o C> inducement has been offered except as herein set forthi~at~-th Release is executed without reliance upon any statement by q representation of any person or parties released or their representatives, concerning the nature and extent of the injuries, damages and/or legal liability therefore: that acceptance of the consideration set forth herein is a full accord and satisfaction of a disputed claim, which is incapable of being exactly determined, , and for which liability is expressly denied. 6. FOR THE SAME CONSIDERATION, it is agreed that the above- styled suit will be dismissed with prejudice to refiling the same, and that costs of court will be taxed against the party incurring the same. 7. Although originally drafted by attorney for the Released Parties, this Release is a contract which shall, in the event of any dispute over its meaning or application, be interpreted fairly and reasonably, and neither more strongly for or against either party. This document contains the entire agreement of the parties hereto. 8. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE ARE CONTRACTUAL AND NOT MERE RECITALS. WITNESS MY HAND THIS DAY OF , 1992. JEFFERY WINTERROWD APPROVED: Chad Baruch Attorney for Plaintiff JI r..7app ~y c 1 I y. -T - ---r-- S d Njenda PJo STATE OF TEXAS * hgerrda rt~ COUNTY OF * RIO *_~2 This instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ C~RQ 1992, by JEFFERY WINTERR0WD. i Notary Public -State of Texas II I i 1 1 a C \Y~ } . IT<YY. COUNCII A r 6 - ooQQ~Q00o09Udp~~co 4 O ~ r^ ~~,-Lt O~Q R h I. ADO .kt7~ <.i I J 4 I I Y. I J d2 A- MEMORANDUM G Tor Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager From; James R. Thomason, Assistant Fire Chief Dater July 27, 1992 I Rer EMERGENCY MEDTCAL SERVICES MEMBERSHIP PROGRAM The 1991-92 Fire Department Emergency Medical Service budget package provided for the creation of an Emergency Medical Services Membership Program. This program is intended to limit the out of pocket expenses for the uninsured portion of the ambulance na ills in urreordy its members. This is accomplished by the establishing the Denton Fire Department Emergency Medit:l Services Membership Program (DEMS). DE'MS members will pay a one time per year membership fee of $36 per membership. The cost is the same for an individual who lives alone household members live or a household, as long as those listed as permanently within the household. onMof their a bechargheld portion for the deductible or copay nce company. ' we file the ambulance bill with their insuraDenton be requiredC of the emember aunless y the payment Ccomes f d rectly todthe Fire Department. This program was to have been implemented by mid-year. However as Kathy DuBose, Director of Accounting and Budget operations, and I A discussed implementation of the membership program, we discovered other possible greatly enhance o r billing l and collections software ities. would efit-, of J After due cons '.deration, we made the decision to explore those capabilities and move cautiously toward the implementation of a billing system designed specifically for emergency medical services as well as membership programs. The system we have selected, by Sweetsoft EMS software, will insurance provide einsr Insurance claims generation~forsothera the standard rd paper C kk~ II companies. The system will also provide past ue a ounEs tracking, membership information and many other features necessary to make this a workable program. This process took more time than originally intended and required some capital outlay which was not originally budgeted for. In spite of these obstacles, we still j were able to bring the program in for the amount of funds available and we anticipate revenues at or above the projected amounts. The budgeted amount for institution of the membership program was $15,000, for office supplies and advertisement. We also requested $5,670 which was earmarked for a computer and software but was not approved. A In an effort to establish the billing and membership system Kathy DuBose and I agreed to use the available funds to purchase the necessary personal computers and software which would give us the capabilities to effectively manage our EMS accounts. We were able to do tY.is by expending $11,610 for the two personal computers. One PC will go to the fire department and one to accounting. At the same time we were able to retain $3,390 in advertising funds to publish brochures announcing the membership program and the enrollment application. Based on information received from Ms. DuBose (iaee attached memo) we should be able to recover sufficient funds from Medicare/ Medicaid claims and the more efficient dispatch of past due accounts to offset the cost of the computers and software. We have projected a possible revenue of $16,920 from the membership program. With the additional capabilities of the EMS billing system Ms. DuBose and I feel there will not only be a increase in the collection rate of EMS accounts, but a considerable savings din the amount of time spent researching and pursuing past invoices. We believe that through the electronic insurance claims submission portion of this package alone we should be able to more than justify the expense and time involved in this system. The turn around time for Medicare/Medicaid would be reduced from six (6) to twelve (12) weeks to a matter of days, usually fourteen (14) to twenty-one (21) days. Electronic claims submission, plus a greater collection rate due to a more efficient tracking system, and the membership program should then allow us to have a greater income potential than was originally planned for. As with any unknown, there are no hard facts to base our projection on. We have only the history of our collections and an educated guess and the projections of our accounting department based on patients transported and the percentage of Medicare/Medicaid patients. Other departments have also played a significant role in putting together the membership program. 't ~ Agcr;r!~ Vern We worked with Ann Bingman originally to allow us to use the-D TO utiliti^s invoicing system as a mechanism to allow households in Denton to subscribe to the membership program and simply pay a three dollar ($3.00) per month charge on their utilities statement. t This I hope will create interest since the household will not have r to pay the $36.00 membership fee up front. Gary Collins in the Information Services Division has also provided considerable guidance in the acquisition of the personal computers and related software necessary to build this invoicing and membership program. If you have questions conserning the membership program please do not hesitate to call me. JRT/lh 11 I I 1 C I l t 1 1 I ~119grJa }d0 - CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 78 01 MEMORANDUX 0 DATE: April 8, 1992 TO: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager FROM: Kathy DuBose, Director of Accounting & Budget operations` 1 SUBJECT: AMBULANCE BILLING SYSTEM 1 During the past year, we have discussed the low collection rate of the City's ambz:lance service billing, Although the city billed almost $453,000 during the 1990-91 fiscal year, collection of this billing was only $196,500 (43,41). Accounting staff has dedicated much time identifying factors contributing to this problem, and I have listed same below. i As a service, thu City files Medicare and Medicaid claims for patients. Initial bills are sent with a request for filing information (medicare f, etc.). This request is often ignored until a second request is issued after thirty (30) days of non payment. After receiving the necessary information from the patient, the appropriate Medicare claim is filed. Medicare makes payment to the patient after four (4) to six (6) weeks of filing. The patient is then responsible for forwarding that portion of tl,,- payment ,Ind the portion that Medicare does not pay ($55 of the $120 I 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434-2629 1 e hperJa Ito. 4 [LEe ~.V ~l:'r~ ~ ~ basic fee) to the City. At ninety (90) days of non-payment, th account is sent to ttie City's agency for collection. That agency retains twenty-seven (27%) percent of any monies collected. We often have problems with errors Medicare make in processing claims, even though we have sent all the correct information on the appropriate forms. At times correspondence sent in an attempt to r rectify these errors io last. We receive letters and calls (as does the City Manager) from disgruntled patients that have assumed the error or delay is the fault of the City. At this time, the City does not file insurance claims for patients. Although some insurance payments are made directly to the City as the provider of services, most are made to the individual. Most patients eligible for Medicare or insurance:. reimbursement assume that the city has filed on their behalf and become frustrated when they receive billings and letters of intent to turn over their account to a collection agency. After reviewing available billing systems and discussing possible enhancements with the Fire Department management we have agreed on what we believe to be the best system to improve collection. I've outlined below highlights of that system and estimated the financial impact on collection efforts. The ambulance billing system includes computer software with the ability to electronically file Medicare claims. (Medicare assures payment within fourteen (14) days on electronic filing.) 1 The system also includes the capability of filing insurance claims. One personal computer would be required at EMS for data input and ~Y f I ~ J11 1 40 is kjrq3 41 one in Accounting for billing and collection. EMS staff would gather all the necessary information on each ambulance run for filing of claims and billing and enter same into the billing system. Accounting staff would produce bills, track payments and be responsible for collection efforts. With the ability to electronically file Medicare and insure patients are paid within two weeks, the Accounting staff could notify patients of filing and inform them of the anticipated payment date. Billings could be timed to coincide with the patients receipt of the Medicare payment and encourage a payment schedule be established for the balance not paid by Medicare. As you are probably aware, most hospitals and doctors offices now file insurance claims for patients in efforts to improve collections. Payments on these claims are made to the provider of service. The patient is then responsible for the portion of the bill not paid by insurance. The billing system we propose includes the capability of filing insurance claims. The ability of the proposed billing system to , electronically file Medicare and insurance claims will greatly enhance the "turn around" time from billing to collection. Any time gained directly relates to increased interest earnings and a i f reduction of "collectible" accounts turned over to the collection i { agency that retains twenty-seven (27%) percent of all payments. After analyzing the average number of Medicare claims and related collections, the accounts that are forwarded to the I collection agency and related collection, the anticipated increase in collections from more timely Medicare payments and enhanced { t~ 1 1L6.W iL~ r4' r collection efforts, Iive estimated below the F.1$n1 for a one year period: 5% increase in payments on accounts (after Medicare payments) $ 31400 Reduction in collectible accounts sent to collection agency 2,100 f Interest earnings on more timely collection 1,500 ' I 1% increase due to enhanced collection efforts 4,300 30 i I cannot estimate the effect insurance claim filing will have on collections, once implemented, the syptem would provide the necessary data base fer these estimates. Allowing EMS to input ambulance billing information will reduce paper flow, increase accuracy and timeliness, and allow the 1 Accounting billing clerk more time dedicated to collection efforts. The personal computer could also house other PC applications and ~ act as a terminal for mainframe data entry. I + i i AFF00223 I 3E V 1 e:wpdocs\emsm.o A 1 S ORDINANCE NO. f1 1' V t~- - 1C~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON AMENDING CHAPTER 27 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCE BY THE ADDITION OF ARTICLE V THERETO ESTABLISHING AN EMERGENCY MEDICAL SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE; PROVIDING FOR PROCEDURES AND AUTHORIZING CHARGES THEREFORE; ESTABLISHING MEMBERSHIP FEES; AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. i THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: ~ I 1 SECTION 1. That Chapter 27 of the Cade of Ordinances is r amended by adding a new article to read as follows: ARTICLE V. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES MEMBERSHIP PROGRAM Section 27-107. Emergency Medical Services Membership Program. (a) Purpose and Authority. This article establishes a medical emergen :y subscription program, as authorized by Chapter 773 of the Health and Safety Code, to be known as the Denton Fire Department Emergency Medical Services Membership Program, hereafter known as Denton Emergency Medical Services (DEMS). The purpose of DEMS is to offer a program to members of residential households that would cap their emergency medical service and ambulance transportation costs while reducing the loss of life and disability. (b) Administration. The Fire Chief shall be responsible for the development of written rules, policies, and procedures relating to the implementation and the administration of DEMS not inconsis- tent with this section, The Fire Chief shall report on a yearly basis to the City Manager and the City Council on the status of DEMS. Each report shall include a full financial statement of the financial status of DEMS. Section 27-108. Eligibility and Enrollment. DEMS shall be open to any person or any household of any city or area served with emergency ambulance services by the City of Denton. Members receiving utilities from the City of Denton may be charged the annual fee through the utility billing. Section 27-109. Member Benefits. Members who join DEMS shall receive the following benefits offered by the Dentoo Fire Department: c ' Y. 1 J v t; f ' hp;:nda Iferil_j~]~-• ~ ~ (1) For insured members, the payment of the uninsured'o Q , i.e. the deductible or co-pay portion or any exclusions under medicare or medicaid of prehospital emergency medical services, including: (a) Basic Life Support (BLS) services; (b) Advance Life Support (ALS) services; and (c) Ambulance transportation services. (2) For uninsured members, the payment of one-half of the regular charge of prehospital emergency medical services, , including: (a) Basic Life Support (BLS) services; (b) Advance Life Support (ALS) services; and (c) Ambulance transportation services. (3) For members, upon request, maintain a Medical Information File which may contain: (a) Medical information to responding paramedic unit; (b) Minor child treatment release; and (c) Member's physician designation, (4) For members, upon request, maintain Emergency Contact File (optional) (a) Notification of parents at work; (b) Notification of other family memberst and (c) Senior citizen family contact. Additional member benefits may be added at the discretion of the Fire Chief, section 27-110. DEMS Membership Fees. The DEMS membership fee charged to each household shall be an annual fee in an amount established by the City Council, and kept on file in the office of, the city Secretary. Payment of the fee shall entitle any individual or permanent resident of the household to receive DEMS benefits, Guests and visitors or others not a permanent resident shall be charged directly for ambulance I services. Section 27-111. Duty to Respond. Under no circumstances will delivery and application of available emergency medical services or ambulance transportation services be delayed or refused based upon whether or not a person is a member of DEMS or can demonstrate an ability to pay for the services, PAGE 2 i i. ri r I 1 Mmrida:jo. CI~)J_ _ 1110 Q??? - - w Seotion 27-112. Termination. / LJ C ID DEMS may be cancelled by a majority vote of the City of Denton City Council. If the council chooses to terminate the program prior to the new program year, the City may, at its option, refund membership fees on a prorated basis. The city shall be obligated to provide thirty (30) days written notice to members prior to program termination. SE.C_:TIO II. That the membership fee shall be $36.00 for each household. This sum shall be payable in advance or a person or household may enroll in the program by applying at the city's Utility Customer Service Department. If a ° person or household wishes to pay the enrollment fee with his utility payments, the City shall impose a charge of $3.00 on each monthly billing. This sum shall be payable upon receipt. In the event a person fails to pay his utility bill on or before the due date, he shall not be eligible for the benefits of DEMS. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective on the day of , 1992, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official news- paper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992. { I BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR 1 ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY A BY, APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: PAGE 3 C °J r E' t ki al 1 C I TY ICOUNCI] - H4-- r I # " ~ ooaoo a o a a Q Q D 000000 0 - O ~ !~-r- 00°C rnu 5~+0~~ a_~ OpQQCC~uG00~~00 TI III I 4 ! h I q-: Yri ~rC }nRn$ 1 4 1 _ r A;1crcla fda. .Z ` Q_~ CITY of VENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McK1NNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 i MEMORANDUM i DATE: August 4, 1992 TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: Kathy DuBose, Director of Accounting & Budget Operationsc' SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF AUDITING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 i In response to Requests for Proposals for auditing services for the I fiscal year ending September 30, 1992, eight firms submitted { proposals. The proposals were evaluated and three firms were interviewed by the Audit Committee, the Executive Director of Finance, and the Director of Accounting & Budget Operations. After oral interviews, the Audit Committee is recommending that the firm of Deloitte & Touche be retained at an amount not to exceed $32f500. This amount is $7,000 less than the current audit fees. This fee can also be reduced by $2,000 annually if the City chooses not to have the firm conduct a separate management study. If you need further information, please advise. i I h AFF00332 81715668200 DIFW METRO 434-2529 r C 'r s M Ij ii AT,Loo 2 E9 G] ORDINANCE VO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT PBETWEEN ROVIDE THE CITY OF DENTON AND - - - - - AUDITING SERVICES AS AUDITORS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR EPIDING SEPTEMBER, 30, 1992; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS,; i SECTIQIJ I. That the Mayor is authorized to execute an N Agreement between the City of Denton and - designating them the auditing firm for the City of Denton for the 4 fiscal year ending September 30, 1992, in accordance with the conditions set forth in the responses to the Request for. Proposal, a copy of which is attached hereto. SCTI_QN_li. That the expenditure of funds in an amount not to exceed $ is hereby authorized. SECTION _III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992, BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY - BY,, APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: ti N ' a I L'' li y! Ii f 7 1 r YC0UNCII lA o~oootioaoaa Qoooo^ ~ k ocoo~: ooDO~~ ~C C C a 0 0 0 4 ~ ~ 0` ~J 1-4 1 1 Y• ~l . 1 { j1 r 1 CITY COUNCIL REPO I FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~o FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager DATE: July 29, 1992 SUBJECT: Naming of the 200 Acre Park Site on Teasley Lane RECOMMENDATION: Consider a recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board regarding the naming of the 200 acre park site on Teasley Lane to Southern Trails Park or South Lake Park. f SUMMARY: As outline in the policy for Naming Park Lands and Facilities, the City council is asked to consider and take action regarding the recommended name for a new park site on Teasley Lane. BACKGROUND: At the June 15, 1992 meeting of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, a committee was selected to be responsible for recommending a name for the new park site. The committee included Tom Judd, Park Board Vice Chair, Mayor Bob Castleberry, Council Member Harold Perry, Council Member Jane Hopkins, Loyce Wilson, Popo Gonzales, and Linda Eaddy. After two meetings, the committee made a recommendation to be forwarded to the Park Board. The recommendation included the top two names as voted on by committee members. Those names were South Lake and Southern Trails. On July 20, 1992, the Park Board considered the Park Naming Committee's recommendation. As a result of the discussion at the meeting, a majority of the Board members favor the name southern Trails Park, By a majority vote, the Park Board recommends that both names, South Lake and southern Trails, be submitted to Council for consideration. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: The name selected for this park will provide an identity for this park site to the entire community. FISCAL IMPACT,: There is no fiscal impact related to this action. 4VEE FUL LY SU . Harrell city Manager C_ qNlame b a et S mp n ark ann g Coor dinator Appr. Nam t. e n Tit er' Executi e Director for. Municipal Services/ Economic Development r 4 r N f l ALL00 M M<~oi~rla hlo." _ ORDINANCE NO. I~ b6 i AN ORDINANCE NAMING A PUBLIC PARK] AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Denton has purchased 200 acres in South Denton for use as a public park; and 4 WHEREAS, a committee composed of Tom Judd, Mayor Castleberry, Dr. Harold Perry, Jane Hopkins, Loyce Wilson, Popo Gonzalez and Linda Eaddy have recommended to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board the names of South Lake or southern Trails for consideration; and WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, composed of Dalton Gregory, Tom Judd, Neta Stallings and Burk.ley Harkless re- commend to the Council the names of Southern Trails or South Lake for Council's consideration; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it would be, proper and fitting to name the park , NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the public property acquired for park pur- poses located adjacent to Teasley and Hobson Lane shall now and hereafter be known and designated as Park. SECTION II. That the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby authorized and directed to let that public park herein named Park be so designated on the official map of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective im- mediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR `Y II t r, Ago nda 1,10 ATTEST: Cale JENNIFER WALT..RS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY I Y I, i I Page 2 `r C. I 1 ti l a PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING ~W 5:30 P.M. p MONDAY, JULY 20, 1992Y DENTON SENIOR CENTER t:s~; f V~ 1 AC1igridI7 Pfo. _ MEMBERS PRESENT! Dalton Gregory, Chair i" Tom Judd, Vice-Chair A.ju ,fi ltsm_" Neta Stallings Burkley Harkless ~ILp STAFF PRESENT: Betty McKean, Serviceseand Economic Development 4 Bob Tickner, Superintendent of Parks Alicia Mentell, Superintendent of Leisure Services Janet Simpson, Park Planning Coordinator Joy Hesch, Administrative Secretary GUEST PRESENT: Philip Neeley~ I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Dalton Gregory, Chair. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM LAST MEETING On the motion of Neta Stallings, second of Tom Judd, the ' minutes of the meeting of June 15, 1992, were approved as written, III, ACTION ITEMS A. Consider a recommendation from the Park Naming Committee regarding the new 200 acre park. (Tom Judd) Tom said the committee which consisted of Mayor Castleberry, Council Member Harold Perry, Council Member Jane Hopkins, Popo Gonzales, Linda Eaddy, and Loyce Wilson had two meetings to discuss suggestions for naming the new park in South Denton. The suggestions had been , 'h narrowed to four possible names - South Lake, signature, southern Trails, and South Park. Tom said that not all members of the committee had been able to attend both of J the meetings, but he had subsequently polled those l members, Popo Gonzales, Jane Hopkins, Loyce Wilson, and Linda Eaddy, for their choices for the park name, The top two choices were South Lake and Southern Trails. South Lake had barely edged out Southern Trails for the name, and Tom felt that most people would be happy with southern Trails if that were the recommendation. Dalton remarked that Sandy Kristofferson had talked with him and had indicated that she had collected 600 names on a petition in favor of selecting Signature Park as the name. L C Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting PVn,Ia 1o July 20, 1992 Page - 2 Janet commented that the Board could choose to se d Loth names to suggested that the Atophtwoa choices l be the committee had ' Council for consideration. Dalton said that if there were a South Lake Park and a North. Lakes Park it could create a sense of polarization within the community. Tom remarked that none of the council members on the committee seemed to think there ! would be a problem with regard to polari,e,tion. Janet said that Southern Trails had been discussed as a possible name because it describes the location and the major feature of the park which are the trails. A trail system was the number one amenity desired by neighborhood residents. Burkley commented he felt that people may get South Lake i and and , North the new n developed thought Southern Trails would be note appropriate. Neta made referece to Section 1E of the Park Naming Policy which states that the recommended name be forwarded to Council, and she supported the name South Lake. Dalton also felt that only one name should be recommended for consideration by council, but he preferred Southern trails and would not support a motion for forwarding two names to Council. Tom Judd indicated that he had voted for and Tom would directed osta a the make named Southern Trails, council aware that three Board members supported the III choice of Southern Trails over South Lake. Neta then moved that both names, South Lake and Southern ` Trails, be recommended to Council for their consideration I as a name for the new 200 acre park. Tom seconded the motion. The motion was passed with a vote of three in favor and one opposed. IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Receive and discuss a report regarding the sale of alcohol in parks. (Bob Tickner) Bob said thYs item was being brought to the Board for discussion because of two recent requests by groups for permission to sell alcohol in a park. Staff requested the Hoard to clarify the guidelines for considering these requests. pr commented that stoff is trying to be proactive and Betty 4 C CITY OF gENTON h~;rndallo DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION !-ti F-•j. POLICY FOR NAMING PARK LANDS AND FACILITIE I, PROCEDURE FOR NAMING PARK LANDS AND FACILITIES A. 'The chairman of the Packs and Recreation Board shall name i a committee that lawill anbefreilitiesltofor rec,ardehding a the B. name for all park B. The committee shall be responsible for research, study, and recommendation of a proposed name to the Board. Rationale for the selection of the recommended name shall , be given in writing. C. The Parks and Recreation Board shall approve or disapprove of the name recommended by the committee. D. If the committee's recommendation is disapproved by the Board, then the ri~atter may be referred back to the committee for further action. be forwarded to E. hell City approval Council h for recommended their n consideration, tt II, GUIDELINES FOR NAMING PARK LANDS AND FACILITIES A. Park lands shall be named within sixty (60) days after acquisition. B. Park lands and facilities shall be named in the following manner: 1. In honor of individuals who donate land for park space or donate a major part of the funds required to construct or renovate a facility; 2. In honor of individuals who sell open space to the city at a reasonable costf 3, in honor of deceased national or state heroes; 4. In honor of deceased community leaders] 5. physical features plake,intrees, streams river) of the land; 6, in relation to siib-divisions within the Citys 7, in relation to streets adjacent to the park. Recommendations under 1, 2, and 4 should noht be City publicized until final action has been taken by ,i Council. I 1 y, y } l A01,mdi No. rlrgand,t item- 1 NW -~1 1 - r) t C. Recreation centers that are a part of or lie win the boundaries of a park shall bear the name of that park (such as North. Lakes Center or Denia Park Recreation Center) unless the park name 'cannot be incorporated in the facility name (such as Denton Senior center). 1 • 1 4 r i A 0. Z t,. 1 k ~ a f 1 J SUMMARY OF PARK NAMING COMMIT'T'EE MEETING` DENTON SENIOR CENTER Aoe+ida THURSDAY, JULY 2, 1992 r Committee Members Present: Tom Judd, Vice-Chair 1 Park & Recreation Advisory Board Bob Castleberry, Mayor Dr. Harold Perry, Councilmember Popo Gonzales i Committee Members Absent: Jane Hopkins, Councilmember Linda Eaddy o- Loyce Wilson Staff Present: Janet Simpson, Park Planning Coordinator Guests Present: Sandy Kristoferson Tom Judd called the meeting to order at 12:15 p.m. and introduced all the members present. Staff and guests were also introduced. Tom asked Janet Simpson to give an overview of the Policy for 1 Naming Park Lands and Facilities. Janet passed out copies (attached) of the policy, an inventory of existing parks, and a summary and History of Park Names. She indicated that in accordance with the policy, the Committee was named by Dalton Gregory, Chair of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. When the committee selects a name for the park, the Park Board will consider the name and make a recommendation to the City Council for final approval. The policy also states that park lands shall be named within sixty days after acquisition and in order to have the item scheduled on the Park Board and City Council agenda., the committee would need to mate a decision in the next few weeks. Janet then summarized the guidelines for naming park land. Tom Judd stated that Jane Hopkins preferred the park not be named for any individual or group, the adjacent subdivisions, or the adjacent streets, rather a name relating to a geographical or physical feature of the site should be considered. Tom Judd then asked for suggestions from those present. Mayor Castleberry said that he also supported a geographical name such as South Lakes Park or South Park. He stated that a geographical name is helpful to those looking for the park to locate it easily and would provide a balance with North Lakes Park,. Sandy Kristoferson then began discussing the development of a "Robert Leathers" playground for the park and circiilated pictures. Her suggestion for the park name was signature Park and presented two logos using that name. she stated that when the playground is built, volunteers would be allowed to place their hand prints or signature in concrete. Mayor Castleberry said he thought that if 1 , .y. 1 f: ~l A 1 R{jDOlfld Ii D.` Page - 2 G the neighborhood wanted to sponsor the Robert Leathers plagrou that her idea would be a good way for the neighborhood to promote the playground and that is could even have a separate name, such as Signature Playground. Ms. Kristoferson stated that the , city neighborhood was not sponsoring the playground, round at the parka committed $100,000 to the construction of a playg promote and and that the she would, along with others help to p solicit volunteer labor for the project. Janet Simpson said60t000 ~ the $100,000 would be used to construct two playgrouiads, , for one near Hobson, and $40,000 for one near Jason Drive. Tam Judd added that volunteers should be gathered from all areas of the 4 city when the project developed. Ms. Kristoferson agreed and stated again that she would like the entire park to be named Signature Park. Popo Gonzales stated that after looking at the Master Plan the lake feature o out and he Three e Poshould reflect nds Park, the water development and suggested the Dr. Harold Perry agreed that the lakes would be a predominant feature and supported Mayor Castleberry's suggestion of South Lakes Park. He agreed that this name would keep a balance with North Lakes while serving as a directional name. He stated that the lakes would be heavily used by the public and provide not only for other name. recreational also suggested Forest Lakes for a park and wildlife. HeC also so Janet Simpson then stated that staff had also suggested names that the park, They ysical phwere related to the staff suggestions Ridgeview Park andLakeW Lakewood Park scharacteristics of included Towne Lake and Providence Park. Tom Judd asked if staff had considered a contest or newspaper ad to it stated ight that solicit by rthee coname. Janet mmittee, although Simpson be difficult to complete in a short time period. Tom stated some good suggestions had been discussed at the meeting and set the next meeting date for Thursday, July 9, 1992, at the Denton Senior center. He thought the other committee members would be available at that time, and wanted to proceed as quickly as possible. Sandy Kristoferson asked if she could attend the meeting Loyce Wilson, who was the o that on the 9th. Janet appointed member from the neighborhood would most likely be at the next meeting. Tom Judd added that Ms. Kristoferson was welcome to attend and sit in on the discussion. The meeting was adjourned. ,r C ti I r. 1 r 1 f _ d I~ • 1 OMMITTEE MEETING If' SUMMARY OF PARK NAMING C DENTON SENIOR CENTER ill, . THURSDAY, JULY 9, 1992 f!1 ) Committee Members Present: Tom Judd, Vice-Chair Park & Recreation Advisory Board Bob Castleberry, Mayor 4 Dr. Harold Perry, Councilmember Loyce Wilson. Committee Members Absent: Jane Hopkins, Councilmember Linda Eaddy Popo Gonzales Staff Present: Janet Simpson, Park Planning Coordinator Tom Judd called the meeting to order at 12:15 p.m. and summarized the discussion from the previous meeting. Loyce Wilson said she had been in contact with several citizens in her area, and had received many ideas for the park name. Some of the suggestions included Cedar Park, Woodview, Chaparral and Ridgeview. She also presented a petition with. 600 signatures in support of the name Signature Park as it was proposed by sandy Kristoferson at the first meeting. Ms. Wilson said she thought the concept was good and that it was obviously supported by the neighborhood. Mayor Castleberry stated that he still supported the name South Lakes. Ms. Wilson said ehe had a concern that if the lakes were not built, the name wuuld not be appropriate. Mayor Castleberry stated that the lakes were a very high priority because of the grant criteria and due to the fact that a lake would serve as a detention pond for water runoff. Dr. Perry said the lake development was important not only for engineering aspects, but would also support fish and water fowl for recreation and nature study. Dr. Perry continued that he also supported the name South Lakes, because it is important to balance with North Lakes Park and provide direction for park users. Tom Judd stated that Jane Hopkins, who was unable to attend the meeting supported the name South Lakes or South Park, Janet Simpson said that the name Southern Trails had been suggested by staff as a possibility since it not only provided a direction, but included "Trails" which is a high development priority for the neighborhood. Tom Judd stated that he could support Southern Trails because it was a more descriptive and unique name. c r 1 f ~yr;n:to 4Jo~ - I Page - 2 has b a r concern park name will create an he perception that image 4 Mayor there he Castleberry relate to the public. Tom Judd then asked each member present to list their top three ! choices in order of priority. He said he would poll the absent committee members, tabulate all the suggestions and present the top two choices to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board on July 20, 1992. The meeting was adjourned. ~I A AJJ00426 e t r, 1 ~ `rte.; ~CITYK: zC0UNCII M WJ - -1 .y _ i OOOOO~QQ~~OQQD ~oOC/ r-~ i JO :F ~p Z O Y~ V 111E dA %r tC+ ~r oo~o~~~~nCCL~Gr Y w+_ 4i n~ _ aaJ l F--•-- , _ it , 1 f [rSi'Y V 11 J A e;updocsNtnpa.r A 1635.2 y A~endra P.U. _-q~~---- I 1 RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION APPOINTING TOM HARPOOL TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. G WHEREAS, term of office of Tom Harpool on the Board of Direc- tors of the Texas Municipal Power Agency has expired; NOW, THERE- FORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY RESOLVES: o SECTION I. That pursuant to the terms and provisions of Ordinance No. 75-22 of the City of Denton, Texas, Tom Harpool is hereby appointed to a two year term of office on the Board of Directors of the Texas Municipal Power Agency, the term of office beginning July 31, 1992 and ending July 30, 1994. SECTION II. That this resolution shall become effective imme- diately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992 BOB CASTLFBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: - APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY., 4 f *00 Agbrtd IOItt._ Serving the citiee of Bryan, Denton, (3BPland 6 Greanvllly, 1 March 31, 1991 Mr, Lloyd Harrell, City Manager city of Denton 215 E. McKinney Denton, TX 76201 ointment RE: Board Member App Dear Mr, Harrells tlls our records indicate ha Power Agency w111a expire emduring the month of the Directors of the Texas July 1992, lease send me a After the City Council reaches a decision an this matter, p certified resolution fpe specifying the person selected to represent your City on the TMPA Board Directors. , your cooperation is appreciated. Sincerely yours, Wanda M. Callahan Assistant Secretary TMPA Board of Directors wmc '1'ex+ts 77505 (400) $73.2013 nrypn, ~ - Tuxx+yluulcipwlPawa Aaanoy P.O. Box 7000 rXl g4123ry~ HdWI iJOtlj rd 07.64 c7,6/6l/94 r. J ~ I ~F I I CITY COUNCII j ~ _ cr OO~ ~ TOO~~ ~ ti «4 r 1 ODQQQrO V• S r+4- ~ OQ~u~~uf~Q~COL i~ I L44..4_ -'Lr-+ 1• ~ .4~-Ill-♦.:_~»-.-_. 1 4e V i` 1 i~ 5 S j ^^1~ ~ ~r CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMA TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council f CAROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: CITY t;OUNCIL CONS IDFRA`I'ION REGARDING CLOSING THE 100 ~ BLOCKS 01, OAK, ELM, HICKORY, AND LOCUST FRWI 6 A,M, - G P.M. ON SA'2URDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 1992 FOR "COUN'T'Y SEAT SATURDAY" CELEBRATION 9 RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval. BACKGROUND: For seven consecutive years the Denton Central Business District Association has sponsored County Seat Saturday, a celebration on the Courthouse Square provided for the community by the downtown businesses. This celebration has grown into one of the most popular in Denton and last. year attracted over 7,000 visitors to the Square, The Denton County Commissioners Court has shown its support for this community event by granting permission to use the Courthouse and grounds without charge, To provide for the safety of the community and provide space for special events, it is necessary that the streets on the square be closed from 6 a.m. - 6 p.m, on the day of the event only, The attached petitions in favor of the street closing reflect the support of the merchants and property owners for this event, Two businesses have signed the petition in opposition: T & Sons and Fllington's• Theso establishments have access t' o their buildings through back entrances on streets that will be open during the event, Property owners not represented by businesses on the Square were mailed a letter of explanation and asked to return a signed petition, As of this date, we have not received a written response from Margaret Hutchinson but have received verbal approval through telephone contact, it E c-i 'c i T--~1I 'f 1 y A 1 F ('TTY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO; Mayor and Members of the City Council f FROM; Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUI3JECT: CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION REGARDING CI,OSI`'G THE Io0 ~ BLOCKS 01, OAK, ELM, HICKORY, AND LOCUST FROM 6 A.M. 6 P.M. ON SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 1992 FOR "COUNTY SEAT SA'T'URDAY" CELEBRATION 4 RECOMMENDATION; Recommend approval. BACKGROUND: For seven consecutive years the Denton Central Business District Association has sponsored County Seat Saturday, a celebration on the Courthouse Square provided for the community by the downtown businesses. This celebration has grown into one of the most popular in Denton and last year attracted over 7,000 visitors to the Square, The Denton County Commissioners Court has shown its support for this community event, by granting permission to use + the Courthouse sand grounds without charge, I To provide for the safety of the community and provide space for special events, it is necessary that the streets on the square be closed from 6 a.m. - 6 p.m. on the day of the event only, 1 The attached petitions in favor of the street, closing reflect the support of the merchants and property owners for this event. Two businesses have signed the petition to opT:osition; 'I' & Sons and Ellington's, These establishments have access to their buildings through back entrances on streets that will be open during the event. property owners not represented by businesses on the Square were mailed a letter of explanation and asked to return a signed petition. As of this date, we have not received a written response from Margaret Hutchinson but I have received verbal approval. through telephone contact. II a i 5 1 N)Cndj No. Ai)(,nda Ql ijj C C PROGRAMSL_UEFART S' AFFECTED: Businesses on Square, Main Street Program, DCBDA, event participants, community at large ~'T5CAI._ IMPr~C1'; None I IZespe Yuliy subm1 ted q oyd V. Harrell City Manager re ed by Ja Bi e f nager Ma'n Street rogram Ap rove rank H. Robb s, AICP Executive Director k Planning and Development i I I w. _ -mac - ~ ~7✓ T \ I i 1 1 I REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE lui'~a4b~ Organization requesting street closure DeA-rMQ i3~sr~es5 plSTfdl GT /Z5r i.4.TlOh.~ ~ '~C_~~ r~21 Contact Person: JAI.~G fal ~Es Address: JOO W OAIC V6%JWZ a•p+l Ml rmW T'4 1U"l Phone Number: Street To Be Closed: C,~a.+~, NtC.~Gat~l, l.e~rnr'N~ou~~ `fi+~ Sgu,~st,~ toa.m- UPeti ALA. Date and Time To Be Closed:5AT, SE:PT- Iq.lA9 I 1 Intersecting Streets: 566 AisoVE + Reason Fou Closure: CO~~JJr`/ GE'AT' SacVO4dy Please complete the bottom portion of this form, $3r3e residents and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST be contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure. NAME AUTHORIZED O US FAVOR/OPPOSE ~r I r ~ 3 ~C..Le 2U 9. 10. 2993C/S ^Y I I t RE UES OR STREET CLOSURE Organization requesting street closure OKI (nstiz" 'FSV 5S pk<--rIPA6T 1S55GGI4-riD1j - \ Sl AJG Contact person: e Address: IrA W OAS tAVAo g.o~i bar-►i IN '1U?c1 f7-'- Phone Number: EL-►+^ ~ H 4 C.K~`l i ~,,vST' ►ib THE SQ V AQ+e Street To Be Closed:Qk% far_LoprA-AL,a. ?~T Date and Time To Be closed: Intersecting Streets: COVE A Reason For closure: residents Please _<~~~:='•°*.a the botto• Portion Of this orClosuce MUST be and/or busit+esses affected by the street contactedand sign to below with an indication of being in favor oc in opposition the $treat closure. NAM AUTHORIZED FAVO OPPOSE OY BUSINESS SI TUR t 4. 7. ± I jjiji~ 8 .U Y m 'wl C L•(f'n~ ~In~h 1c P 615'!c 10. 2983C/5 s n wk REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE Organization requesting street closure De~.m~~.! e em* .A.L. + P.~tJSl1.,16E,5 p1STISrSGT /~,SSoGe,t~,TIOfJ ~ 1 qurrni ; Contact Person: -kAWF- BI L-156 ZD . Address: f00 W OA IC LUtZ 9,0 1 Oe 4m0 T U zi Phone Numbers STS` Street To Be Closed:OAe,W•M +H1tXA: gtL4CAAT*'AZWW0IIASSWARA to a v" - lip W AL-4-1 Date and Time To Be Closed: S^T. 515.P'T Iq,ig4a. 4 I Intersecting Streets: "45 ABOVE Reason For Closure: CCx.JxrN SEAr SatVet*q Please complete the bottom portion of this torsi. aLSe residents and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST be contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor I or in opposition to the street closure. 1 NAME AU R ED 0 BUSINESS FAVOR/OPPOSE 1. R x/ S"rA z~ i 2. n u ✓s~ Y 3. F U C,(D / Vo NJ 6-0- 4 -kw rA 5 . If1~~1i,~S c At.0 R c~ P J 51 IV ~,Vlo.-I ma V6) t I U( 1~E '~o ~I., I~, vU 1U :,VI;I(III ~ tk . W l,li Y I Ci ~ l G J ? rep/>>+~ro---/}Jc+l. 10. A/011,Lsl 29B3C/5 \Y~ + t 1 Y. - ~f I i REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE Organization requesting street closure t)e4JMW C.6MTRaL, P.SVSfAIESS Dis-rr-1 GT ASSor j4- -jokJ ~snc a u. Contact Person: •.~ANg $I}..ES Address: G loo VJ OA-4 tVI~ A04 tftt mpo 'i'SL JUDo1 W'W._ _r._ R.--- Phone Number: S?o(* b5-%9 Street To Be Closed: C ACLeA ffi, K1C*: 'q, ZOC.isr-Aeoowo 71445 .(;QVA Lo aM-t~~a►r~Al.l. Date and Time To Be Closed: S^'r. SMPT: Iq,l^Ct Intersecting streets: 5Bds A80v( Reason For Closure: C0Uh1714 SE,b7' ssn~eg4.~ Please complete the bottom portion of this tors. residents and/or businesses affected by the street closure MY-S_T be contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure, NAME AUTHORIZED 1 0 BUSINESS 9 A FAVOR/OPPOSE i W--j ' rM~<sr c- c.~rL. 6. ' 9. 4Vw 9. 2983C/5 ~ J r 'f 1 i REQUEST FOR STREET CL05URE Organization requesting street closure bC-,&rr0Kj C,t✓rOTRAU ~1JSIf.1ti=~S QIST21GT /S,SSgGI/,~'~!p►~1 1~„'! Contact Person:, 3ht. BI uEs AE!'ida I :V ' v [1tt+ - ~ Address: (Do W PRIG fm-OW, gn~.l i TV -1U9,01 Phone Number: s106 %6-A9 Street To Be Closed: CAe,Et-rAj MC -0e\1, [XJST"AOOOrJb `ri-m GQQArz-. LO a vt~ - In p rh A LJ..• Date and Time To Be Closed: SAT. Intersecting Streets: GeE A?,oVG Reason For Closure: GoUr.J"M S6A'r 4T-U'I-Ak Please complete the bottom portion of this form. ALL residents and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST be contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure. { R ess 1 AUTHORIZED IGNAT E FAVOR/ - 1. 10 45 G I1 2. _1J.0t NJ L C (iyt~✓ 3 _ i 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 2983C/5 I I y ! l i REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE Organization requesting street closure Ccj#-tro 1 C.6m*rpAL,. _ T3VSIp.IGSS OISTIeIGT /s,SSb~;I/,~-I-IDIJ Contact Person: JA.h.IG BIUEs ~41~nJaPJo., Address: Ion w o,41G sutra dcjj ~ti~ t~~1t,2-o I0 e Phone Number: Sto& %5-'A9 1 1 Street To Be Closed: 4A4,BG+1A ~ Hlt rcne~l, ~c~sr-A~puND~A_ ~p~ Au. Date and Time To Be Closed: 5r, SE-',PT'. ICIIqqq loQ~+- Intersecting Streets: SSE; A$ovcn-. Reason For Closure:_C.oL-5.j S(:'AT' ,G^T-UP-Ueiy Please complete the bottom portion of this form. ALI, residents and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST be contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure. Ar-e,u\ r)12 GS5~ AUTHORIZED ~S S NA RE FAVOR OPPOSE 2. / 3, 4. 5. 6, 7, B, 10 - 2983C/5 1 1 II i I III iy, e P RE UES'C FOR STREET CLOSURE IQrnda ~JDC~~V- Agenda Ilem_ k' Organization requesting street closure Ccnma►-J GtilrFeb~I~C_ C_ f PaVStl,.1CS'S pIS:TIZIGT /sSSoGI/,~`(-101.1 ~y Contact Person: JANE 1311 ES Address: JOo W OAK SVM Aod-I C~hrmt" U1A-11J2-o1 Phone Number: S7Dto $5.'A9 - - Street To Be Closed: QAeI6(,m HILKaoeyl LADeQS..T-• 5 k:a T-k C-0 A-20 u Date and Time To Be Closed: fir. F-T. fR,IqqQLOQ W 'ALA" ° irweM~rr..~:~. Intersecting Streets: SP.ES Apovr=, Reason For Closure: 60VW~4 S-A-r SarU23Lj Please complete the bottom portion of this form. ALL residents and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST be contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure. A-oDeess AUTHORIZED r ~~~45S- SIGNATURE h 1 FAVOR/OPPOSE . 3. 4 5 - _ 8. 10 2983C/5 C L 1 RE UEST FOR STREET CLOSURE ~ti ~tld Itt,~~j Organization requesting street closure Dc-,t, ►.1 C• r.sri~,s~ T3VStr.,it:.ss 171ST'f~1GT /L55oGl/~r-r~til .--~=~-~~.~a Contact Person:_3A"CG BI L E5S 1r Address: loo %A,' OAK SU1r~ 9.0,0 'Ti -IU9.01 t b~t,rTn i Phone Number: STIvG a5~q Street To Be Closed; C;AC,~isw~,Hi[X~ar~y,~~c.,~ST •Aou,~p.~~~n Date and Time To Be Closed: 5A'r. 5F_~F'1" I loQr lsPrn~ ~ q, IqR~ tntersecting Streets: SEE AUbVC= Reason For Closure: C-00tfT'~4 G64T` G&TVC ~ Please complete the bottom portion of this form. ALL residents and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST be contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure. AUT ORIZED Or 12 S1 _AT E FAVOR OPPOSE 1. 2. 3 9 ~ A 5. 6. 2963C/5 (-1 I r 'i i~ RREQUE;T FOR STREET CLOSURE I.J L F~N7 rrda 1J Q-3 r11I organization requesting street closure° }:n(, IPr ff ]3V~+f~.lE6S pIS'rfz.1GT /S$SoGI,Q.TlOl.1 n,~. ) I fl Contact Person: B14.E5 Y Address: iCyo W o/►IC 5V ao+~ perr.rrnN IN 'IUP-D3 Phone Number t Street To Be Closed: M~ E^~HI'D~`~~`~r'n2OUND^iF~6 StauAR+~ uPrA A1.t- ~I Date and Time To Be Closed: SAT 65-pr. 19'19ga- j intersecting streets: Gr,6 AMsoVS I 4 Reason Foc Closure: SEATR31~4d'y M Please complete the bottom portion Of this tocis. residents and/or businesses affected contactedand sign belov with an t indication of lbeing In favor li or in opposition to the street closure. A ~~5 AUTHORIZED GNATIME FAVOR/OPPOSE I 2. 3. 41 5. 9. I 10.- 2983C/5 c l3 1 REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE) rl' hgrnd7hao L VU ~ ~ organization requesting street closure DS#- '-'r`•l T6vtiime,6S R71ST04GT ASSC6I4T-;Otj ~~Bit,Es contact Person; Addcsos: -Loo W OAiG 1.0M X064 bepr to rN -ll.~LzI r Phone Number: StP40 ad~R 1 Street To Be Closed. CANC.PW-A K10X40r-%43L4C-0ST•AQW J0 VA6 SQVA 4 lpa.m- Upm - .p.LLA 1 Date and Time To Be Closed:5Ar1 SePr- A 141q;L Intersecting Streets: SEE A XgOVS 1 4`I Reason For Closure: 6W.M~ StAr 6a>QP-L Please complete the bottoa portion of this fora. residents and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST be I contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure. Ab-Dpes "AMR-, AUTHORIZED -010-' ff S ATU FAVOR OPPOSE 1. ~r~ VV L `l - ~6 2. I 3. ' 4. 5. b. 7. 8. 9. 10. 2983C/5 I 1 t tl l r REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE ~4l~nda No.~ J c~^_ rJ Organization requesting street closure Dr#-t'r0Q C.6a-rs `"fai 73VStr`tesS p!S'ffZ1GT nS~rA.T'loti.l ~ J~. ~ ~ ~ Contact Person: 3At-J0 SI UES Address: f00 W OAS f.UITo ;.cA t7R"r.rm rl "Ti 'lu ?-01 Phone Number: Slots 966-0 Street To Be Closed: qer,Bl.r+~rNfC~KcMe`IrI.OC-vST'ArdDU►.tDTF► ~qv,~R io a rr ~ V PrN ~ ALA, Date and Time To Be Closed:5AOr, C%rT- Iq~lg4a. intersecting Streets: SBF AZovE Reason For Closure: G Okay SEAT' SarV204.4 i Please complete the bottom portion of this forme residents and/or businesses affected by the street closure ST be contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure. Alt) Dek~s~ AUTHORIZED \ j Or SUMN" -G I N TUB FAVOR. fib 1. C)-( W. 2. 4. S 6, 7. 8. 9. 10. 2983C/5 1 ~ y 1 REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE r tion requesting street closure C-eJTP'W'1a110 . ; organization 11310 ~~•sll,ig6S pISTF=iGT nsSoGi~o.-r+or.1 Contact Person: -`NG Bs UEs w~ -14po1 J Address: IM ) d~K LVff-C a'D4 tosf-r= Phone Number: 'Ur' bb?~i A1 ~1,(,pGJSr•Ai ~►11]"THE SGtU/RC Street TO Be Closed. 0.-.~-~ eA-M' t%IC'KAAZ (pavr- l,pM-Aw i 5 r. taste and Time To Be closed: Sa►'T n Intersecting streets: 5E6 a20y6 - - Reason For Closure: CCx.>NT%4 CZAI- Please complete the bottom portion of this form. $4eSe residents and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST be contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure. AUTHORIZED FAVOR OPPOSE S 2._ - 3. 4. 6. 7. 9. 10. 2903C/5 low N, f REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE ~llendafVi, (23 c~ Organization requesting street closure D *-rtOQ C-6M.Tr{#;d':+..._Q- 'f3uSIA1f✓6S DiSTrCrGT /SSSoGI,tLTlo1.J 1 LN, J-C~ Contact Person: -3ANIE BIt.Efw V f Address:-I OO W OAK 4VSIT 4,04 G6nrmpJ T%' IU¢aI Phone Number: S-tPt+' W ;6R t Street To Be Closed: 0AX,'.1..rn+HICor-O 14k l.4G,J%T'•A2wwc) "1j18 ggu,R + to A P Date and Time To Be Closed5A7. SEPT ~ l~rh-~~ rq, rR4 Intersecting Streets: 5E6 ABove, Reason For Closure: Coy&M-4 GZA'r GWTVIB44 Please complete the bottom portion of this torsi,! residents and/or businesses affected by the street closure ST be contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure. AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE + FAVOR/OPPOSE 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. + e. 9. 10. 2983C/5 L I j r. - - - - - REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE Alwida PJn. - ! . ~~uq+fa Itc+nl. k OeganIzation requesting street closure eTC'Q ~ r, 73VSlAJC:SS t~IST~IGT /S$SoGI,<LTIOl..I C Contact Person: 3AW0 BIL.66 Address: loo W AAK faUM a"44 b5o►-rMIJ IN'IUD-Ot Phone Number: 5U6 atia4 Street To Be Closed: 4A4eLet-eA, lu'-'eNr t.ot^`Ar"Awuwo iiAz sQUASEd to o✓M"-Lop m-/AU.. " S►r• :yF.FT Iq~tg4a. Date and Time To Be Closed: Intersecting Streets: 666 AaovE Reason For Closure: C00Xrrq S¢.AAT' G4TVgt* Please complete the bottom portion of this form. a residents and/or businesses affected by the street closure ST be contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor i or in opposition to the street closure. -NAM- AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE F VO /OPPOSE o N 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 9. 9. 10. 2963C/S REQUEST FOR STRE£4T C[~OSURE ~ A errla Merit DEro~ ANT°~`" organization requesting street closure p~U51h„~B6S pISTa~.'IGT /x55cGI,C1,T101.1 ~ ~~l Contact Person: -'►-IE BI ~E¢ Address: 100 W OAK L0A1Z a," M"J=P -N 1UD~0 ► C Phone Number: COL au.'~9 Street To Be Closed: 4AX,p,1-Mj Her 'O~`~; ~`x'~r '4~p~~D Sq~/ Uaky" - (ipm- ALAI Date and Time To Be Closed: S&T, 98Pd- lq,IQqgo~ intersecting Streets: GEM ABove, Reason For Closure: (XLX)hjJ SEA'r" Sary2t*%%4 Please complete the bottom portion of this form. residents and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST be contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure. ujms op N~ AlQN RIRZED _ FA 0 OPPOSE /V vv, 1. 1 r 3. 5.~ 6. 7. e. 9. I 10. 2983C/5 Y~ ti C i . i p I 1 I', I REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE (r j IM, L-Ae, -j C-SYr n organization requesting street closure 73osime,$5 01sT'0ACT /YSSoOIQ.TIOPt n'IP° Contact Person: JX..1E BIt.66 o Address: 100 W oxr. soil 9.DA4 C:0,0NmrJ 714 .1u" I 4 Phone Number: Slob abaq Street To Be Closed: C41cud,E1►~^~MIGC`l,LaG~IST'KZOU►~D^1445 600ID- (P04v" JprA - 4LA. I Date and Time To Be Closed:5Ar. SMFr- 1q,1c14;. 4 Intersecting Streets: 5Er- AlSbVe. Reason For Closure: C[x)x r`/ Sje4l %&TV2t %4 Please complete the bottom portion of this fora. ~L3e residents and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST be contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure. ` MXNE • AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE FAVOR/OPPOSE !Z G t' "z 1. I 0c) 2. 3. I 4. 7.! - e 10. 2983C/5 0I n ~ I\ I l 1~ r J M13UEST FOR STREET CLOSURE aga~~d~ No.`s ~ _ Organization requesting street closure De# rkj T$V~Sflle~`r AIf~T121GT /x55oGl,q.'r'IOAl Contact Person: JANE Bs uEs Address: 100 vV DA. r. 460 WO a.O4 bft~ ),Jm10 IN 1V4-0t Phone Number : SEP& % A9 Street To Be Closed: Cam, HICKCOC%41L7C. Sr-AQWM0 T46 CAvAZ4 Leavv.- 1,pm ALA. Date and Time To Be Closed: 5AT. aIE.P'r, Iq,1g4., Intersecting Streets: Gets 42BoVff, 4 I Reason For Closure: CW1 SeWr SesV2tA%4 Please complete the bottom portion of this tors, residents and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST be contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure. ADp2Bn5 1 - gxMr'-' AUTHORIZED J SIGNATURE ' ~~rAVOR/OPPOSE 1. /0 pA-V 2. I 3 4. 5. , 6. 7 I 8. 9, I 10. 2983C/5 ti ♦ ~Y l ' 1 REQUEST_ FOR STREET CLOSURE ' lt~ancla horn organization requesting street closure D45,~-=N Z > }3~5~~~¢S DISTW cT /AS6cGI4.-rloN r Contact Person: SIDES, Address: 100 W C IG 6U WO 0'1~0 4 tat" 0 `f `1UP-01 Phone Number: S-Wo %6A44 Street To Be Closed: OAe,e.l-M HI 'OG~~~~_ r~/J~O~~oTH6SCpv~LC (aavr.- UPrA At t. p' or- Date and Time To Be Closed: 54►T- S.F'T A laq, Intersecting Streets: 5E6 ABOvu s Reason For Closure. C,Cx.5kir,+ SEAT SaTV2La4,4 Please complete the bottom portion of this form. ~(y rebidents and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST be contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure. NAME AUTHORIZED OF BUSINESS SIGNATURE FAVOR/OPPOSE I 1..,, y b eA z. 3. a - 4. I 5. h 7 S. - 10. 29S3C/5 i l E 1 i REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE ~~olada th J J F aencla flcnl 2.LU_.t.1.. 1 Organization requesting street closure D~urni J-MIL-~ C=1 F.S~+si~,ebs RiST'~GT /s55oGi,cLTior..l ~~I~~~_! T Contact Person: B:t,ES Address : 1 cc W OA,K susV a0 4 06f-rmN IN '1 u9-o t Phone Numbor: 620` ab~`~ y Street To Be Closed: ( ,e4,M, KICXIOZ'i, t,OGt~r+T ,~py+~D 1149 GQQA9.8 1 laarn- Upnt" i AU Date and Time To Be Closed: igLa4~- 1 I Intersecting Streets: GOO ABuyd, o Reason For closure: cD+.3xjl SEA'T' Se:M30L- '4 Please complete the bottom portion of this form, &k residents 1 and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST be contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure, NAME AUTHORIZED OF BUS S SIGNATURE FAVOR/OPPOSE $ f , , CI Tc>~1' 1. 3. CD 6FFiCg J v 4. 5. UNIQI)E RPaE~ ~i~USTS vi l 7- 9L5a U P~41__U nee a. 9. Z;ilA C'L%e 10. Z983C/5 t ti 1 .....'AII*} J V, REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE Organization requesting street closure De;X t J f ENT~,ei. F3VSfIJE6S F{1CntI~IJo, : piSTE1GT /x5ScC.r.ATIO/J ~ ~ Contact Person: +*JG 81WES Address: IOo W_OAIG f60Mr1.04 Mt-- oJ'TU'tu"I - _ / Phone Number : 6b'?9 I i street To Bo Closed : OAe a 4A, }AIC*:ccq, LdGA)Sr''AiaWWC) THS bouArt+C tp A rr+ ^ t~ P►N A.L A. r Date and Time To Be Closed: SaLT, 5ef7' Iq,IgCt intersecting Streets: Sees a$oyu Reason For Closure: Ccx~NT`~ Ar G4TVMAq j I Please complete the bottom portion of this form. ~LL4 residents and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST be contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure. -NAM& AUTHORIZED -OF llusi*g" I--91(;NATURE FAVOR/OPPOSE 1. 2) 2. 3. a 4. 5. 7. S. 9. 10. 29B3C/5 5 r J O MAIN STREET co~ DENTON too West Oak, Suite 209 Denton, Texas 76207 f1abJ .L1r"' (817) 566-8529 l June 23, 1992 , I owl lace Duvall 2100 South Lane Denton, TeXasl 76201 Dear Mr, Duvall: County sent Saturday is a Colebrnt,'totl and commemoration of the, spirit and LradiLion of the past. IL is a gilt. Lo the community from the merchants and professionals in the Central Business District Association, The Courthouse on the Square will be transformed from the sent, or county government, to the leaf, of social functions as it was in 1896, when the cattle Anil crone right through Lown, once again, the event will require that we limit accoss to the Square to pedestrian traffic. The City of DenLon requires that, it, addition to signatures from business owners in the affoated area, we collect signatures from property owncrsa. We would approcinte your signature on the enclosed form. We have encloser. an envelope for your convenience in returning the 8lgnrd fvrm to the DAltn Street office by July 10, 1992. In 19110 County Seat Saturday received the awrn•d for Best Promotional [went from the Texas IlownLown Association. 0101 your cooperation, we can continue Cho tradition of this award-winning 1'esLival hi Denton, If you have any ques Mis 'filllnlt you in advance 1n1' your prompt . CL`SpOI181', I'ekardinks the sL1 e(!t'. ctosuro of County Scat. SaLuuday, p,lenso do not. hesitate Lo call us at 666-8529 or mol.ro 211-931.2520, extension 8529. ly, f J 1 S' 'ore ,lane 13, tPR Main Street; PlanagOr encI AHILIATLD WITH: Nalionil Trasl for liisloric Preservallon, Mitional Main Slreel Center, Texas Historical Coromissfon, 'Ibxae Main Street Cenlrr, •f exns DwaOluwn Associmion, renlon Central [7usiness Uislrio Association i~ ~1~ 4 i V t t 1 1 , i •q', u DI.rcCVER 0 DOWNTOWN MAIN STREET Jfll D E N T O N blond»rdo~~~~ -`,~r~ 4 g41pttd 100 West Oak, Suite 204 - Denton, Texas 76201 (817) 566.8529 1ltlti ? Arn__L -4 at I -C-111-. 1 June 23, 1992 1 Wallace Duvall 2100 South Lane Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Mr, Duvall County Seat Saturday lsitaisea`'giftito the communitYtfromotheltmerchants and tradition of the past. professionals in the Central Business District Association. The Corrthouae on the the seat Square will be transformed was in 1896, when thec~attle, traitlmcamet right through it social functions as s town. Once again, the L raffic.~Tle City of Denton that lthat, inCadditiont pedestrian to signatures collect signatures from property from business owners in the affected area, we owners, We would appreciate your signature on the enclosed form. We have enclosed an ' envelope for your convenience in returning the signed form to the Main Street office by July 10, 1992. In 1990 County Seat Saturday received the award for Best Deuooneration, we Promotional Event from the Texas Downtown Association.st iv Withiyour can continue the tradition of this award-winning fe cuestions any Thank you in advance for your prompt response, if lQayou sehavenot hesitate Co regarding the street closure or County Seat Saturday, please i call us at 566-8629 or metro 214-491-2520, extension 8629. go erely, 42 Bile s Main Street Manager encl. AFFILIATED WITt(t National Trust for Historic rteservation, National Main Street Center, Texas Historical Commission, Texas Main Street Center, Texas Downtown Associatlon, Denton Central Business District Association A 4 1J1Ji I 1 Ir M CITY „ µ C 0 U N C I I « i oooaaoaoo~o°~,---. 000000 ~ F ° ~ °0000~~ 3 r O U~u a tu.L002E7 fir....! RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS THE 1992-93 BUDGET OF THE DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the 1992-93 proposed budget of the Denton Central Ap- praisal District was submitted to the city of Denton before June 15, 1992; and WHEREAS, the Denton Central Appraisal District adopted this proposed budget on July 16, 1992; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton has 30 days from the adoption of the proposed budget by the I+enton County Appraisal District to adopt a resolution approving or disapproving it, and WHEREAS, the proposed budget contains a list showing each proposed position, the proposed salary for the position, all benefits proposed for the position, each proposed capital expenditure, and an estimate of the amount of the budget that will be allocated to the City of Denton, Texas; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOt,VES: SECTION I That the city council, pursuant to Article 6.06 of the Texas `Pax code, the 1992-93 budget adapted by the Denton Central Appraisal District on July 16, 1992, SECTION II. That this resolution shall become effective imme- diately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY i BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: - A ti AW, T y I LEE WALKER I i lt''\'% PRF.C I NCT 9 r BUDDY COLTS A PRECINCT I F M r DON IULL D [ PRECINCT4 SANDY JACOBB PRECINCT 2 DENTON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUR JUDGE JEFF MOSELEY tt (B17) 383.029tlvj`JJ' July 23, 1992~a. 1 ~ ~1(,nda I Bn . Honorable Bob Castleberry ~l City of Denton x'10 _ 215 E. McKinney Street Denton, TX 76201 Dear Mayor Castleberry, On Tuesday, July 21, 1992, the Denton County Commissioners Court, discussed the proposed 1992 budget for the Denton Central Appraisal District, During the d{scusslon, the Court requested input from other governmental entities In order to determine it other entities ore l In agreement with the proposed 1992 budget for the Denton Central App Please review the enclosed analysis prepared by Denton County Auditor, James Wells The Commissioners Court expressed extreme concern In the proposed $ 121,000 Increase for salary and benefits, Send your response to the Denton Co y Commissioners call Coe rt as soon to the Aide possible Thank you. If you have any questions, Court, Linda Haggett at 817-383.8399. YFFMOOSSEE LEY `JDe nton County Judge J M/Isb cc; Commissioners Court County Auditor, Jaynes Wells Chief Budget Officer, Donna Stewart COURTIIOU5EON TM 39 11ARF 1 119 W. HIM) HY - DENTON, TFXA976201 (817) 399.8399 (917) 393.1196 • (900) 340.3199 \ i. _ , c BUDDY COLE LEE, WALKER PREC1NCr I PRECINCT 9 SANDY JALZ)B9 4 ! DON HILL PRECINCT 2 PRECINCT 9 * IN 10 DENTON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUft JUDGE JEFF MOSELEY (817) 383.0288 G f~ July 23, 1992 Honorable Bob Castleberry A.1lrnda (o1r{,_.1 City of Denton ) r " i 215 E. McKinney Street n'1o r y Denton, TX 76201 J} Dear Mayor Castleberry, On Tuesday, July 21, 1992, the Denton County Commissioners Court discussed the proposed 1992 budget for the Denton Central Appraisal District, During the discusslon, the Court requested Input from other governmental 1 entitles In order Io determine If other entities are In agreement with the proposed 1992 budget for the Denton Central Appraisal Dlstrlct , Please review the enclosed analysis prepared by Denton County Auditor, James Wells, The Commissioners Court expressed extreme concern In the proposed $ 121,000 Increase for salary and benefits, Send your response to the Denton County Commissloners Court as soon as posslbie, Thank you, If you have any questlons, please call the Alde to the Court, Linda Baggett at 817-383-8399. Yo trot I J F MOSELEY Denton County Judge JM/Isb cc; Commissloners Court County Auditor, James Wells Chlef Budget Officer, Donna Stewart COUIVNIOUSEON T]IF, SQUAIM • 110W. HICKORY • OENTON, TEXAS 70201 \ (817) 393.8399 s (817) 3834180 • (W) 3403189 \ r6 r, t;o c n DENTO.N COUNTY COURTHOUSE ANNEX COUNTY%CDITOR 41116654W Jai E. MCKINNEY ICCOU.NTSPAIARIA.. 111U56345II DENTON. TEAS 16101 V f INTERNAL.LUDIT 1111s"51`1 COLLFSTIONS 11111s"43" ~ IBAd ~ DENTON COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE JAMES A, WELLS, CPA DENTON COUNTY AUDITOR J MEMO J Apr!1W,1 Lem,-- .l - - - July 16, 1992 CUIH _.l~l To; Denton County Commissioners Court i From: James Wells, County Audito4__ , Re: Analysis of 1993 Denton Central Appraisal District Budget At a advertised public hearing on July 16, 1992, the Board of Directors of the Denton Central Appraisal District voted unanimously tc approve the budget proposed by the district staff. Three individuals spoke at the public hearing, which was lightly attended. Two members of the Hoard of Directors were absent, According to State Property Tax Code, the taxing jurisdictions that must fund the District's budget have 30 days from the date of the public hearing to protest the adopted budget. As requested by the Commissioners' Court at their July 14 meeting, I have prepared the following analysis of the Appraisal District's 1993 budget, I 1. The 1993 budget will increase by $169,400 from $2,208,725 to $2,378,125. This represents an increase of 7.7%. 2, Denton County's required allocated expenditures to fund a portion ' of the District's budget is estimated in their budget to increase to $345,820. The County's funding for 1992 is $303,008. Next year's funding will be a function of the final Appraisal District budget, the County's tax levy and the levies of the other 46 taxing entities served by the District, 3. Of the nearly $170,000 budget increase, $121,100 will be for salaries and benefits, and $16,000 will be for furniture & equipment. The District will add 1 full-time employee--a department head for the newly created land appraisal department. Annual salary for the new position will be $44,400. A half-time position at $10,000 and a part-time position ($3,000) will also be added. There will be 48 full-time positions in the 1993 budget. 4. The revenues and expenditures associated with the collection of taxes for taxing entities are separate from the proposed budget. , Collection is a self-supporting, non-profit operation that totaled approximateIy $100,000 in 1991. i c' e njenda tloin. _.1~~~L91~.__.• tide 0 ' l . _ "in lie 5. Merit raises of 3% for existing employees are included proposed budget. The average salary of Appraisal District employee q will be $25,250 plus $4 per month per year worked longevity pay. 6, The Property Tax CodR requires that Appraisal Districts return t unspent funds to the taxing entities that fund them, About three years ago, this was accomplished by the District lowering for one year their assessments on the taxing entities. In late 1992, the District is planning to issue refund checks of unspent funds (rather than lowering the assessments) to the taxing entities. The refunds will be of an unspecified amount. District staff stated that they " liked to keep 1 1/2 months of expenditures in reserves, and the 1991 ending fund balance was approximately $600,000. 7. Other major spending increases in the 1993 budget include $10,000 for medical insurance premiums; $5,000 for legal expenses (up to $85,000); $7,000 for DP maintenance; and $6,500 for legal notices. Training and travel will be reduced by $4,400 and telephone expenses will be reduced by $4,800. Appraisal Review Hoard expenses stay constant at $22,680. The above analysis cover the major portions of the 1993 budget. I trust that it will be beneficial to you in making your decision on the budget, i i 7 , Z A @COMC JUN ] 5 RECT CIYY CF NAG FIS OFFICO f 4 r' konda Ho. AgarrU~y+terrt~ DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT 1993 PROPOSED BUDGET ,.r y DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT 1993 BUDGET TABLE OF CONTENTS ASlerrda IJo. Arplid3 Item_ _~7 ~S 1 Page 1 - TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2 - BUDGET LETTER I Page 4 - SUMMARY OF 1993 ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AND COMPARISON TO THE 1992 BUDGET Page 5 - 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS EXPENDITURES BUDGET AND COMPARISON TO THE 1992 EXPENDITURES BUDGET Page 6 - EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES & DECREASES Page 35 - 1993 ALLOCATIONS WORK SHEET Page 37 - 1993 SALARY SCHEDULE \J 1 I r Y. e A DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT, "I I MORSE STA££T P.D. 40% 7014 DENTON. TEXAS 16707 611 _6E 0401 / ` A{1n,uf0 N0... Aueiida Ilan. JJ_ '7 June 10, 1992 ~I Chairman of The Board Members of the Board of Directors Denton Central Appraisal District Gentlemen The Denton Central Appraisal District's 1,993 Proposed Budget for the fiscal year ending December 31, 1993 1s hereby submitted to the Board, Tn accordance with Section 6.06 of the State Property Tax Code, the Budget is also being submitted to the 47 Jurisdictions that financially support the operations of DCAD. The member Jurisdictions served are located in Denton, Dallas, Wise, Tarrant, Cooke, and Grayson Counties, The 1993 Proposed Budget retiects an increase of 0,79, which is equivalent to 8169,399,76, A merit salary increase of up to 39 is included. Of the total budget increase, 892,238.47 will benefit the appraisal activity, This is the first budget in recent years in which the maJor percentage of the in^rease directly benefited the appraisal activity, Previous budget' udget increases have primarily accommodated legislated mandates, which seldom are related to appraising property, A substantial portion of the appraisal related kludget increase will be utilized to improve our appraisals of land, The current state of the economy has made it difficult to appraise land at market value, Substantial tracts of land are being offered on the market, and ofpurchlased, at a fraction of is substantially impacted tbypspeculation, 1eavailability tofalue land, availability of financing, location, topography, traffic patterns near the land, accessibility, zoning restrictions, and foreclosures, Mass appraisal concepts work well for tax appraisal purposes on most classes of property, and normally address land sufficieptly, However, sometimes individual tracts of land require an in-depth analysis, To address this need, we are creating a department that will focus on appraising land, 5 l L r. I Page A{tanda 1do. L,1~ r, ti..r! r ~1f~ 'y AflCltrld p4111 ~cl The Land Department will be comprised of a newly created dep r head position and two appraisers that will be transfered from other departments, One appraiser will be transferred from the Residential Department and one from the Commercial & Land Department, Currently, both the Residential and Commercial & Land Departments appraise land. When the two employees are transferred into the Land Department, the j responsibility of appraising land will shift to the Land Department. This approach will permit the land appraisers to dedicate 100$, of their time to appraising land, The other budget increases are due to the constantly increasing demand for DCAD's services, Our data processing maintenance increase , Is due to the additional data processing equipment that has been mr purchased, This equipment is necessary to provide support systems such as sales, which are extremely important to an appraisal program, The budget for advertising of legal notices is increasing three-fold, This is due strictly to mandatory advertising, Increases in printing and postage for various notices reflects the continual escalation of legislated mandates. Our staff fully understands that the additional cost of the latter expenses referenced above is ultimately borne by the taxpayers. However, the Legislature apparently believes that the taxpayers wish to be taxed endlessly, Irregardless of the additional cost, when the Legislature decrees that an appraisal district provide additional services, appraisal districts must perform. Sincer y, Joe Rogers Chief Appraiser A is e DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT Page 9 SUMMARY OF 1993 ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AND COMPARISON TO THE 1992 BUDGET 1,00r,ila No 1992 ~t,7errJallen 93 BUDGET CLASSIFICATION 4tiu - 11 -1 1 _ t REVENUESI FUNDING FROM JURISDICTIONS $2,188,725,36 $2,358,125.12 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS $20,000.00 $20,?x-0.00 TOTAL REVENUES $2,208,725,36 $2,378,125.12 rrrrwarwawwrr rwnrrrwrrrrrr EXPENDITURESe TOTAL BUDGETED EXPENDITURES $21 208,725.36 $2,378,125.12 rrrrrwrrwwrrr rrwrsrwwrrvvw 1111 I k A I ti v. t 1 i DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTi"r!T Page 5 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS EXPENDITURES BULGET 0ot,o ` Abe qa ilom AND COMPARISON TO THE 1992 EXPENDITURES BUDGET r L ACCT CLASSIFICATION 1992 BUDGET 1993 BUDGET 5117 SALARIES, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , $1,134,105.38 $1,225,128.52 5119 SOCIAL SECURITY (FICA), , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 78,174.73 84,693.18 w 5120 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115,602,76 125,899.22 5121 RETIREMENT (TCDRS) , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 59,250,15 63,274.83 0 5123 LONGEVITY PAY , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 91720.00 11,756,00 5124 AUTO EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113,940,00 118,188.00 5125 WORKERS' COMP INSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174925.06 20,896.69 5126 GENERAL INSURANCE , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 15,134.00 15,134.00 5127 AUDIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,275.00 4,350.00 5128 LEGAL SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80,000.00 85,000.00 5129 OIL, GAS, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL, AND UTILITY VALUATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,850.00 21,750.00 5130 DEEDS, SALES, AND VALUE INFORMATION . . . . . . . , 28,756.89 29,422.76 5132 PRINTING SERVICE, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 33,887,16 37,256.69 5133 OFFICE SUPPLIES , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 43,295.00 44,915.00 5134 FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,729.12 33,759.00 5135 OFFICE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE. . . . , , , . , , , , 9,200.00 9,200.00 5136 DATA PROCESSING MAINTENANCE . . . . . , , . . , . , 93,356,00 100,485.20 5137 MEMBERSHIPS, SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES . . , , , , , 8,032.83 71076.45 5138 TRAINING - SCHOOLS, CONFERENCES, AND TRAVEL . . . . 27,700.00 23,285.00 5139 POSTAGE & FREIGHT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62,098,00 67,088.00 5141 LEGAL NOTICES & ADVERTISING . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,000,00 91500.00 5143 ELECTRICITY, WATER & SEWER, , , , , , , , , , , , , 23,212.00 31,920.15 5145 TELEPHONE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32,528.28 27,708,44 5146 BUILDING & GROUNDS MAINTENANCE, , , , , , , , , , , 28,765,00 33,365.00 5148 APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 22,680.00 22,680.00 5152 CONTINGENCY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,000.00 30,000.00 5153 BUILDING & LAND PAYMENT . , , . . , , , , , , , 59,088.00 59,088.00 5154 BUILDING & LAND IMPROVEMENTS. , , . , . , , , , , 25,290,00 27,000.00 5155 MISCELLANEOUS , . , , , , 7,430.00 7,605.00 5156 OTHER ASSETS. . . . , . . 700.00 700.00 TOTAL . ' . . . . . . . . . . . , . $2,2081725,36 $2,378,125,12 asaa aaavsavar as av avapvmavm v , w. 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 6 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASE63e1 IA Hoy d(3NT. ACC9 ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL---- (DECREASED) - 5117 SALARIES . . . 1993 BUDGET ■ $1,125,128.52 $191,023116 1992 BUDGET ■ $1,134,105.36 i THERE ARE 48 FULL-TIFIE EMPLOYEES IN THIS PROPOSED 1993 BUDGET. PRIMARY ELEHENTS OF THE 1993 SALARIES BUDGET ARE AS FOLLOWSi (1) A 3% MERIT INCREASE FOR EXISTING PERSONNEL (2) A DENARTMENT HEAD FOR THE NOW LAND DEPT, a THE PERSONAL PROPERTY DEPT. (4) FART-TAMS EMPLOYEE FOR FOR CURRENT EMPLOYEES' SALARIES X 1.03% . . . . $1,168,128.52 DEPARTMENT HEAD FOR NEW LAND DEPT. . . . • • $441000.00 HALF-TIME EMPLOYEE FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY . $10,000.00 PART-TIME EMPLOYEE FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY DEPT $3,000.00 TOTAL SALARIES - ACCT A 5117 . . . . . . . . ;10225,128.52 srsr..rr.wrw■ 5119 SOCIAL SECURITY (FICA) . . . . . . . . . . . 1993 BUDGET ■ $84,693.18 $6,518.45 1992 BUDGET ■ $78,174.73 THE FICA BUDGET ITEM IS BASED ON THE EMPLOYEES' COMPENSATION. THE FICA BUDGET AMOUNT IS COMPRISED OF THE FOLLOWING, (1) FICA ON SALARIESi SALARIES X FICA RATE FICA AMOUNT $1,225,128 52 010765 $93,722.33 ' (2) FICA ON LONGEVITY, i LONGEVITY X FICA RATS ■ FICA AMOUNT $11,756.00 0.0765 $899.33 (3) LESSr FICA ON SALARIES OF FOUR EMPLOYEES NOT PARTICIPATING IN SOCIAL SECURITYi SALARIES X FICA RATE FICA-AMOUNT - $1290784.09 0.0765 ($9,92848) TOTAL FICA - ACCT $ 5119 . . . . . . . . . . $84,693.18 rs.or.rwr \ f I 1 r. 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 7 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) 5120 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . 1993 BUDGET - $1254899.22 $10,296.46 1992 BUDGET - $1150602.76 THE GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE BUDGET IS FOR EMPLOYEES ONLY. ii,~ ~rd~ P!o"~,v' d THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT DOES NOT PAY FOR DEPENDENTS' IiI-, INSURANCE. THE CURRENT ANNUAL BILLINGS FOR FORTY SEVEN Ago 'llOm EMPLOYEES TOTALS $113,618.96, WHICH AVERAGES $2,417.42 PER EMPLOYEE. WE HAVE BEEN ADVISED THAT THERE WILL PROBABLY BE A 12%+ INCREASE DURING THE LAST QUARTER OF 1992. BASED ON THE EXPECTED AVERAGE ANNUAL COST PER EMPLOYEE, THE GROUP HEALTH BUDGET ITEM IS CALCULATED AS FOLLOWSs ESTIMATED NUMBER OF ANNUAL COST EMPLOYEES X PER EMPLOYEES - TOTAL 48 $2,707.51 $129,960.48 LESS AMOUNT CHARGEABLE TO TAX COLLECTIONS ($4,061.27) TOTAL HEALTH INSURANCE - ACCT A 5120 $125,899.22 ` rrrrrrrrror 5121 RETIREMENT (TCDRS) . . . . . . . . . . . . 1993 BUDGET - $63,274.83 $4,024.68 1992 BUDGET - $59,250.15 TKI RETIREMENT EXPENSE IS 5.174 OF GROSS PAY FOR ALL FULL-TIME PERSONNEL. THE BUDGET CALCULATIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS s (1) TCDRS ON SALARIESi TCDRS TCDRS SALARY X RATE - AMOUNT $1,212,128.52 0.0517 $62,667.04 {2) TCDRS ON LONOEVITYi TCDRS TCDRS WNGPVITY X RATE? - AMOUNT $11,756.00 0.0517 $607.79 TOTAL RETIREMENT - ACCT 5121 . . . . . . . $63,274.83 rrrrrrrrrr C 1 t it C 1 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 8 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCT ACCOUNT OR CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) 5123 LONGEVITY PAY, 1993 BUDGET $11,756,00 ---$2,036,00 y1 1992 BUDGET r $9,720.00 EACH EMPLOYEE'S LONGEVITY PAY IS $4 PER MONTH FOR i EACH YEAR OF GERVICE. THE BUDGET INCREASE IS DUE A(;er,da No. TO THE ACCRUAL OF THIS BENEFIT TO EMPLOYEES HIRED rj ~r Abe BEFORE THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINS, AN EMPLOYEE HIRED d'Item.{ ] Q DURING THE FISCAL YEAR WILL NOT BE ELIGIBLE FOR Rile THIS BENEFIT DURING THE FISCAL YEAR. TOTAL LONGEVITY PAY TO ALL EMPLOYEES , , , , $11,924.00 LESS LONGEVITY PAY CHARGEABLE TO COLLECTIONS ($168,00) TOTAL LONGEVITY PAY - ACCT # 5123, , , , , . $110756,00 www~wwwaw■ 5124 AUTO EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT , . . , , . , , , 1993 BUDGET w $118,188.00 $4,248.00 1992 BUDGET w $113,940,00 THIS BUDGET ITEM IS INCREASING FOR THE NEW EMPLOYEE IN THE LAND DEPARTMENT. (1) EMPLOYEES THAT RECEIVE A STANDARD MONTHLY AMOUNT OF $350 FOR AUTO EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENTI NUMBER OF RATE PER NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES X MONTH X MONTHS w TOTAL 26 $350.00 12 $109,200.00 (2) AUTO REIMBURSEMENT TO EMPLOYEES THAT DO NOT RECEIVE A STANDARD MONTHLY AUTO REIMBURSEMENT. THE PAYMENT IS FOR MAKING MAIL RUNS, PICKING UP OFFICE SUPPLIES, AND OTHER MISC. TRIPS, MILES RATE PER NUMBER OF DRIVEN X MILE X MONTHS TOTAL 800 $0,280 12 $2,688,00 (3) EMPLOYEES THAT RECEIVE A STANDARD MONTHLY A140UNT OF $175 FOR AUTO EXPENSEi NUMBER OF RATE PER NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES X MONTH X MONTHS y TOTAL 3 $175.00 12 $6,300.00 TOTAL AUTO REIMBURSEMENT - ACCT II 5124 $118,188,00 wwsw»www~~~ Y. 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 9 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION ----TOTAL (DECREASED) 5125 WORKERS' COMP INSURANCE. . . . . . . . . . . 1993 BUDGET - $20,896.69 $2,971.63 1992 BUDGET - $17,925.06 THE INCREASE IS DUE PRIMARILY TO THE RECLASSIFICATION OF A . t ~rnd~ Ju. M 0111)2) POSITION FROM A CLERICAL RATING TO AN APPRAISER'S RATING AND THE INCLUSION OF LONGEVITY INTO THE AMOUNT SUBJECT TO At)r;ntta Ile rt__ WORKERS' COMP. C:tls A~ (1) APPRAISERS 0 $2.61 PER $100 SALARYi ( L( 9 SALARY x RATE TOTAL 2.6100% $17,042.69 LONGEVITY X RATE - TOTAL 216100% $153.57 (2) OFFICE CLERICAL 0 $.64 PER $100 SALARYi SALARY X RATE - TOTAL $572,151.87 0.6400% $3,661.77 LONGEVITY x RATE TOTAL 0.6400% $38.66 TOTAL WORKERS' COMP - ACCT A 5125. . . . $20,896.69 ru rrrrrrr A 5126 GENERAL INSURANCE. . . . . . . . . . . 1993 BUDGET - $150134.00 $0.00 1992 BUDGET - $15,134.00 THE GENERAL INSURANCE BUDGET ITEM IS COMPRISED OF THE FOLLOWINGi (1) BUILDING, CONTENTS, ETC. . . . . . . . $4,500.00 (2) BOND INSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . $1,516.00 (3) COMPUTER EQUIPMENT . . . . . . . . . $2,605.00 (4) PMLIC OFFICAL LIABILITY . . . . . . . . $4,500.00 (5) VALUABLE PAPERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,200.00 (6) EMPLOYEES DISHONESTY BONDS . . . . . . . $600.00 (7) NOTARY REGISTRATION. . . . . . . . . . . $213.00 TOTAL GENERAL INSURANCE - ACCT # 5126. . . . $15,134.00 rrrrrrrsrr l` v. t: A 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 10 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) 5127 AUDIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1993 BUDGET n $4,350.00 $75.00 1992 BUDGET r $4,275.00` ~flentla ldo. - THE 1992 ACTUAL AUDIT CHARGE WAS $4,7.00. THE BUDGET ' FOR 1993 IS BEING INCREASED A MINOR AMOUNT. ~4iol'++U~l1em. G TOTAL AUDIT - ACCT 8 5127. . . . . . . . . . $4,350.00! c) rrrnrrrrr ~-'I~ 9 5128 LEGAL SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1993 BUDGET r $85,000.00 $5,000.00 1992 BUDGET w $801000.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM IS CHARGED FOR ALL LEGAL EXPENSES ASSOCIATED WITH DEFENDING VALUES. NOTE] THE 1991 EXPENSES FOR THIS ACCOUNT WERE $103,525.45. TOTAL LEGAL SERVICES - ACCT M 5128 . . . . . $85,000.00 rrrwrrrrwrw 5129 OIL, GAS, AND UTILITY VALUATION. . . . . . . 1993 BUDGET w $21,750.00 ($2,100.00) 1992 BUDGET w $23,S50.00 THE BUDGET AMOUNT FOR THIS LINE ITEM 15 BEING DECREASED FOR 1993. THIS ITEM IS CONTRACTED FOR A TWO (2) YEAR PERIOD AND WILL BE REBID DURING 1993 FOR 1994 AND 1995. THE 1993 CONTRACT IS FOR $21,750. TOTAL VALUATION SERVICES - ACCT @ 5129 . . . $21,750.00 urorrrwr 5130 DEED, SALES, AND VALUE INFORMATION . . . . . 1993 BUDGET r $29,422.76 $665.87 , 1992 BUDGET r $28,756.89 THIS BUDGET ITEM IS COMPRISED OF THE PRIMARY SOURCES OF VALUE INFORMATION. (A) DEPT - ADMINISTRATION VALUE SOURCES ` (1) MARSHALL AND SWIFT UPDATE. . . . $337.85 (2) MARSHAL SERVICES - 3 SETS. . . . . . $408.16 (3) AERIAL PHOTOS. . . . . . . . . . $20000.00 (4) BREA MARKET DATA @50 PER MO. . . . . $600.00 (5) SREA COMP BOOKS. . . . . . . . . . . $1,200.00 TOTAL DEPT 1. - ADMINISTRATION VALUFS SOURCES -$4,546.01 j' 5130 DEED, SALES, AND VALUE INFORMATION (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) ~Y t r. I ii I I A 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET ?age 11 i I EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED 1 ACCT ---CLASSIFICATION ATOTAL (DECREAa^ED) 5130 DEED, SALES, AND VALUE INFORMATION (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE) / - - (B) DEPT 2. - COf41ERCIAL & LAND DEPARTMENT SOURCES AclandaNo` ~ (1) MARSHAL & SWIFT COMMERCIAL ESTIMATOR. $508.56 ' r (2) MARSHAL & SWIFT RESIDENTIAL ESTIMATOR $379.60 Agenda ltnr (3) D/FW APARTMENT REPORT . . . . . . . . . $320.32 Lae (4) D/FIB OFFICE REPORT. . . . . . . . . . . $412.30 (5) D/FW SHOPPING CENTER REPORT . . . . ~II $412.30 (6) D/FW INDUSTRIAL REPORT. . . . . . . . . $412.30 (7) TEXAS ECONOMIC PUBLISHERS, INC. . . . . $100.25 (8) URBAN LAND INSTITUTE. . . . . . . . . . $294.00 + (9) M.L.S. DENTON BOOKS . . . . . . . . . . $619.01 (10) N/E TARRANT CO BOARD OF REALTORS. . . . $220.00 (11) NEW MARKET REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL. . . . $104.00 (12) M.L.S. DALLAS ON-LINE COMPUTER SERVICE @$98/H0 . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,176.00 (13) TRENDS IN THE HOTEL INDUSTRY. . . . . . $179.13 (14) APARTMENT OPERATING EXPENSE REPORT. . . $37.44 (15) REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRENDS . . . . . $110.00 (16) GREATER DENTON BRD OF REALTOR . . . . . $100.00 (17) MPF RESEARCH INC. "APARTMENT, OFFICE, SHOPPING CEN'T'ER, INDUSTRIAL REPORTS". $1,700.00 (18) NEW MARKET GROUP SOUTHWEST "REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRENDS". $150.00 TOTAL DEPT 2. - COMMERCIAL PROPERTY SOURCE $7,235.21 (C) PERSONAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT (1) CAR COST GUIDE . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5140.00 (3) TRADE-A PLANE . . . . . . . . . . . $78.00 (4) VEHICLE REGISTRATION LIST . . . . . . . $600.00 (5) MaCLEAN HUNTER MKT RPRT-TRUCK BLUE BOOK $112.00 (6) DATA QUEST - GUIDE FOR OLDER EQUIPMENT. $372.13 (7) DATA QUEST - VOLUMES 1 & 2. . . . . . . $791.16 (8) NATIONAL MARKET BLUE BOOK $85.00 , (9) AUTO AND TRUCK N.A.D.A. ; . . . . . . . $75.00 (10) COLE (CRIBS/CROSS) DIR . . . . . . . . $620.00 (11) POLK CITY DIRECTORY . . . . . . . . . . $88.00 (12) ZIP CODE DIRECTORY. . . . . . . . . . . $36.30 (13) AIRCRAFT BLUE BOOK. . . . . . . . . . $91.00 (14) INSURED AIRCRAFT TITLE LIST . . . . . . $75,00 (15) OLDER TRUCK BLUE BOOK . . . . . . . . . $85.00 (16) NADIA OLDER USED CARS. . . . . . . . . . $43.00 (17) FORKS BROS. BLUE BOOK . . . . . . . . . $50.00 (18) HUNNICUTT COST INDEX. . . . . . . . . . $25.00 (19) MARSHALL & SWIFT UPDATE . . . . . . . . $113.00 (20) CARS OF PARTICULAR INTEREST . . . . . . $20.00 (21) MISCELLANEOUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . $200.00 TOTAL PERSONAL PROPERTY $3,699.59 5130 DEED, SALES, AND VALUE] INFORMATION (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) i 3 `i ti i 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 12 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED` ACCT CLASSIFICATION ACCOUNT OR _ TOTAL (DECREASED) 5130 DEED, SALES, AND VALUE INFORMATION (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE) (D) DEPT. 4 - RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT r (1) MOBILE HOME N.A.D.A. . P4ienda tJo. - $78.00 c. C1 I (2) MARSHALL & SWIFT RESIDENTIAL COST A,{lendlllom HANDBOOK . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63.95 Llile TOTAL RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY $141.9-5 CX 1-j'-DD $141.9 (E) DEPT, 7 - RESEARCH & TRANSFER DEPARTMENT (1) BUSINESS RECORDS MICROFILM D"NED INFO &$1,1501HO . . . $13,800.00 TOTAL SAGES & VALUE INFO - ACCT # 5130 . . $29,422.76 ww+++wrwww 5132 PRINTING SERVICE ' . . . , • . . . . . 1993 BUDGET + $37,256.69 $3,369.53 1992 BUDGET - $33,887.16 THIS ACCOUNT IS CHARGED FOR ALL ITEMS THAT ARE PRINTED, THIS BUDGET ITEM IS CALCULATED AS FOLLOWSi I (1) REAPPRAISAL NOTICESi QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE TOTAL - 185,000 -V0.052 ° -$9,620.00 (2) MICROFICHE COPIES OF REAPPRAISAL NOTICES . . . . . . . • 57,500.00 (3) CERTIFIED APPRAISAL, ROLLSi -PAGES-- X UNIT PRICE w TOTAL ' 74,250 $0,0813 $6,036,53 (5) STATIONERY,FENVELAPESS BUSINESS CARDS, $3,050.00 EXEMPTION FORMS, INVOICES, LABELS, AND VARIOUS STANDARD FORMS, ETC . . . . $50500.00 (6) PRINT BUDGET - 75 COPIES. . . . . . . . $350.00 (7) PRINT RENDITIONS. . , $10150.00 (8) ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT - 75 COPIES , (9) SALES LETTERS . . . , $350.00 NEW ITEMSr $1,725,16 (10) NEWSLETTER. . . . . . . . . $10600.00 (11) APPRAISAL MANUAL. . , . • $375.00 TOTAL PRINTING - ACCT 4 5132 . . . . . , - - C • $37p256.69 wrsrrwrrww i 1 n 4f Il. ~l 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET FNge 13 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES , INCREASED ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) 5133 OFFICE SUPPLIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1993 BUDGET - $44,915,00 $1,620.00 1992 BUDGET - $43,295.00 THE OFFICE SUPPLY BUDGET IS COMPRISED OF THE FOLLOWINGi ~i No. Y (1) DATA PROCESSING SUPPLIES &)nncla AgNI 240 m ~C) p (A) GREEN BAR STOCK FORMS - 1 PART llzie L CASES 4=~- X UNIT PRICE TOTAL $46.00 $4,600.00 s 100 (B) GREEN BAR STOCK FORMS - 2 PART CASES X UNIT PRICE TOTAL 20 $61.00 $1,220.00 (C) APPRAISAL CARD FORMS v QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE - TOTAL 800 1 ON $0.015 $12,000.00 C (D) MAGNETIC COMPUTER TAPESi QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE - TOTAL 30 $30.00 $900.00 (E) PRINTER RIBBONSi QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE - TOTAL 40 $50-.00 $2,000.00 (2) MAPPING SUPPLIESi (A) MICROFILM READER/PRINTER PAPER (PLAIN PAPER) REAMS X UNIT PRICE TOTAL 100 $3.50 $350.00 5133 OFFICE SUPPLIES (CO)rTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) e v J f1 p l./ 1 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Edge 14 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED " ACCT CLASSIFICATION ACCOUNT OR TOTAL {DECREASED} 5133 OFFICE SUPPLIES (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE) - (B) MICROFILM READER/PRINTER PAPER (CODED PAPER) >C~~~-~ 4 pi}antl~ PJol ROLLS X UNIT PRICE r TOTAL Arlo r`a Ileml_ 1-~ --5-- $63,00 $315.00 (C) VELUM MAPPING PAPER ROLLS X UNIT PRICE r TOTAL, - 10 $43.00 "$430.00 (D) ??TRACT & MAP JACKETS FOR PLAT CABINETS QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL - r 400 $12.25 $4,900.00 (3) GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES (A) MAPSCO (DALLAS CO. & TARRANT CO.) r SETS X UNIT PRICE s TOTAL, I 15 $36.00 $540,00 (B) k;NVELOPES QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE TOTAL 135,000 $0.03 $4,050,00 (C) RETURN MAIL STATIONERY QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE TOTAL 25,000 $0.222 - - $5,550.00 (D) COPIER PAPER 11500000 SHEETS r 360 REAMS) REAMS X UNIT PRICE r TOTAL, - 360 $3,50 $1,260.00 ('E) MISCELLANEOUS - PENS, PENCILS, TYPEWRITER RIBBONS, FILE FOLDERS, TAPE, ERASERS, ETC . . . , , . . . , . . . . . $6,500.00 (F) BOOKS ON P. C., SPREADSHEETS, ETC, , , $290,00 (G) FAX PAPER . . . . . . , . , $100.00 TOTAL OFFICE SUPPLIES - ACCT 0 5133. . , , $44,915,00 C ssrrrrsrrs ti y ,I 1 al 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 15 EXPLANATION OF MEMirrRES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCT CLASSIFICATION OR TOTAL ACCOUNT (DECREASED) 5134 FURNITURE & _ , EQUIPMENT. 1993 BUDGET Y--$33,;59,00 -$16,029.88 1992 BUDGET ■ $17,729.12 THIS BUDGET SECTION IS DIVIDED BY DEPARTMENT, WITHIN EACH DEPARTMENT, THE BUDGETED ASSETS ARE GROUPED SO THAT ADDITIONS TO DCAD S ASSETS ARE GROUPED TOGETHER, NondaNo; FURTHER, REPLACEMENT ASSETS ARE ALSO GROUPED TOGETHER, AN "N" TO THE LEFT OF THE ITEM MEANS THAT IT IS NEW +tiJw Irk OR AN ADDITION, ACCORDINGLY, AN "R" INDICATES AN fa!In~ 1___. ASSET TO BE PURCHASED THAT WILL REPLACE ONE PURCHASED PREVIOUSLY, tJ (1) DEPT, 1 - ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT ASSETS N (A) FILE CABINET, FOUR DRAWER, LEGAL SIZE, W/LOCK QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE TOTAL, - 2 $300.00 $600.00 H (B) BOOKCASE, 72" H x 48" W QUANTITY x UNIT PRICE ■ TOTAL $225.00 N (C) OPEN SHELF FILING SYSTEM QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE ■ TOTAL 2 - $300.00- _-_$600 00 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT ASSETS . . . $1,425.00 (2) DEPT. 2 - COMMERCIAL & LAND DEPARTMENT ASSETS N (A) MOBILE MAP STAND N/12 BINDERS QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE ■ TOTAL 1 00 - $400.00 5134 FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) ti I 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page lb EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) 5134 FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE) N (B) PERSONAL COMPUTER & SOFTWARE QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE - TOTAL AoondaN06-0 Agenda lom-EI'- l 1 $3,000.@@ $3,00@.00 N (C) PERSONAL COMPUTER PRINTER J101 H~) QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 N (D) COMPUTER STAND QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE TOTAL r 1 $400.00 $400.00 TOTAL COMMERCIAL & LAND ASSETS . . . . . $4,900.00 (3) DEPT 3 - PERSONAL PROPERTY ASSETS N (A) FILE CABINET, 4-DRAWER, LEGAL SIZE, W/LOCI( QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE - TOTAL 1 $300.00 $300.00 TOTAL PERSONAL PROPERTY ASSETS . . . . . $300.00 (4) DEPT 4 - RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEPARTIM ASSETS N (A) TABLE, 2' X 3' QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE ■ TOTAL - - $100.00 $100.00 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT ASSETS $100.00 5134 FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) i C r, 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET page 17 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCT ACCOUNT OR CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) 5134 FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE) 1 (5) DEPT 5 - DATA PROCESSING DEPARTMENT ASSETSr AcC''lda,VU. AgCe1r;a N 114p1 (4 (A) FILE CABINET, 4-DRAWER, LEGAL SIZE, WITH 14CK fljly QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE TOTAL $300.00 $300.00 N (D) MODULAR DATA PROCESSING FURNITURE QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE TOTAL I 1 - - $300.00 $300.00 R (C) 1200 LINE PER MINUTE COMPUTER PRINTER QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1 $13,000.00 $13,000.00 R (D) COMPUTER TERMINALS QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE TOTAL - 12 $405.00 $4,860.00 TOTAL DATA PROCESSING ASSETS . . . . . . . $18,460.00 (6) DEPT 6 - APPRAISAL SUPPORT DEPARTMENT ASSETS N (A) FILING CABINETS, 4-DRAWER, LEGAL SIZE, WITH LOCK QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE TOTAL - 3 $300.00 $900.00 N (B) FILING CARTS QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE TOTAL $120.00 $240.00 TOTAL APPRAISAL SUPPORT ASSETS $1,140.00 5134 FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) 1 r, s lE 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Mge 18 EXPLANATION OF EXPLWDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES ' INCREASED ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) 5134 FURNITURE & EQUIPHCNT (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE) (7) DEPT 7 - RESEARCH & TRANSFER ASSETS AgondaNo. N (A) PLAT CABINET At~enJa~cm ) ~Q_. QUANTITY R UNIT PRICE a TOTAL ( - B - v ~3~_) 4 i~ 1 $2,809.00 $20809.00 N (B) PERSONAL COMPUTER & SOFTWARE UANTITY X UNIT PRICE a TOTAL ^ 1 $3,000.00 $3,000,00 N (C) PERSONAL COHPtPCER PRINTER, 24 PIN QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE - TOTAL 1 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 N (D) ROLLED NAP FILES QUANTITY R UNIT PRICE TOTAL 3 - $175.00 5525.00 TOTAL RESEARCH & TRANSFER ASSETS . . . , . $70434,00 TOTAL FURNITURE & EQUIPT - ACCT # 5134 , , , $33,759,00 C 1 •a a 1 A,I 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Nge 19 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) 5135 OFFICE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE . . . . . . . . 1993 BUDGET - $9,200.00 $0.00 1992 BUDGET - $9,200.00 1 MAINTENANCE OF ALL OFFICE EQUIPMENT EXCEPT FOR THE PERSONAL COMPUTERS, THE PRIMARY COMPUTER AND COMPUTER PERIPHERtAL DEVICES IS CHARGED TO THIS ACCOUNT. THE EQUIPMENT INCLUDES TYPEWRITERS, ADDING MACHINES, M~incla;doC' U COPIERS, AND FORM BURSTERS. WHEN THE COST TO REPAIR A~J run tfa " 11can~_1 THE EQUIPMENT EXCEEDS THE COST OF REPLACEMENT THE ASSET IS REPLACED AND CHARGED TO THIS ACCOUNT. Cola DEPT. 01 - ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTt0!lTf L C?~ 1. COPIER (SHARP SF2400) $1,400.00 2. VARIOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT $5,914.00 DEPT. 06 - RESEARCH & TRANSFER 1. MICROFILM READER/PRINTER (314 MODEL 500) $250.00 2. MICROFILM READER/PRINTER (3M MODEL 7540AJ) $500.00 3. HICROFISCHE READER/PRINTER (3M MOD 7540AJ) $500.00 4. ENGINEERING COPIER (OCE MODEL 7100) $576.00 TOTAL OFFICE EQUIPT MAINT - ACCT K 5135. . . $9,200.00 5136 DATA PROCESSING MAINTENANCE. . . . . . . . . 1993 BUDGET - $100,465.20 $7,129.20 1992 BUDGET - $93,356.00 THIS ACCOUNT IS COMPRISED OF BOTH DATA PROCESSING HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE. BOTH ITEM ARE CHARGED 7r. TH.KS ACCOUNT SO THAT THE TOTAL COST OF DATA PROCESSING WILL BE SHOWN IN ONE ACCOUNT. ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT IS INCREASING THE EXPENSES IN THIS ACCOUNT. THE SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE COST IS BEING DECREASED B% $4,079.00. (A) HARDWARE MAIN TENANCEP 1. MAINFRAME & ACCESSORIES HONEYWELL 7000 . . . , . . . . . . . $30,328.20 2. 1200 LPN BAND PRINTER (PRINTONIX P9012 PRINTRONIX MODEL P9012 . . . . . . . $2,369.00 3. 600 LPH DRUM PRINTER " ULTIMATE MODEL 244523-001-2260 . . . $3,276.00 4. 600 LPN BAND PRINTER PRINTRONIX P600. . . . . . . $2,592.00 5, 515 ME DISK DRIVES, FIVE (5) EA . . . $8,400.00 6. 9-TRACK 6250/1600 BPI TAPE DRIVE. . . $2,592.00 7. 9-TRACK 6250/1600 BPI TAPE DRIVE. . . $2,592.00 5136 DATA PROCESSING MAINTENANCE (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) C 4 I C I t r. j t` 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 20 i EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) rT FROM PREVIOUS PAGE) 5136 DATA PROCESSING MAINTENANCE (CONTINUED 8. TERMINALS . . . . . . . . . . . $1;m .00 7. VARIOUS HARDWARE CONNECTIONS, CABLE AND MOVING EQUIPMENT . . . . . . . . $1,500.00 8. PC MAINTENANCE . . . . . . . . . . . $2,000.00 / 9. UPS MAINTENANCE (EPE) . . . . . . . . $3,500.00 Ari •rr V (8) SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE: ialMrt 1. CONTRACT MAINTENANCE. . . . . . . . . $25,836.00 $8,360.00 2. DESIGNATED PROGRAMMING EXPENSES . . 3. TRAINING ON PC AND WORD PROCESSING. . $1,640.00 4. MICRO COMPUTER PROGRAMMING. . . . . . $41SM. 00 TOTAL D.P. MAINT - ACCT M 5136 . . . . . . . $100,485.20 5137 MEMBERSHIPS, SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES. . . . . . 1993 BUDGET r $7,076.45 ($956.38) 1992 BUDGET ■ $8,032.83 THIS ACCOUNT IS CHARGED FOR ALL MEMBERSHIPS AND DUES, AND SUBSCRIPTIONS TO EDUCATIONAL MEDIA. THOSE ITEMS NOT APPLICABLE DIRECTLY TO A DEPARTMENT ARE CHARGED TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT. FURTHER, THOSE ITEMS CHARGED WITHIN A DEPARTMENT THAT ARE NOT CHARGEABLE TO A PARTICULAR EMPLOYEE ARE CHARGED TO THE DEPARTMENT HEAD. DEPT. 01 - ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT CHIEF APPRAISERi 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.00 3. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF APPRAISAL DISTRICTS $900.00 4. INTERNATIONAL ASSOC. OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $95.00 5. DENTON & LEWISVILLE BOA1;U OF REALTORS $235.00 6. NORTH TEXAS CHAPTER OF TAAO' $100.00 7. N/E TARRANT CO. BOARD OF REALTORS $500.00 8. THE PERRYMAN REPORT (ECONOMIC REPORT) $99.00 9. KIPLINGER NEWSLETTER $63.00 10. NEWSPAPERS $94.00 It. PROPERTY TAX LEGISLATIVE SUMMARY $125.00 12. ZIP CODE DIRECTORIES $33.45 " THE FOLLOWING ARE FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC'S USE 13. TEXAS PARKS & RECREATION MAGAZINE $10.00 14. TEXAS MONTHLY $20.00 DEPUTY CHIEF APPRAISER 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.00 3. INTERNATIONAL ASSOC OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $95.00 5137 MEMBERSHIPS, SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) I . 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET page 21 d EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) 5137 MEMBERSHIPS, SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE) DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIONS 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.00 3. ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL ASSESSORS $105.00 t 4. TEXAS hUNICIPAL LEAGUE $250.00 5. EXECUTIVE STRATEGIES $75.00 6. WALL STREET JOURNAL $119,00 Aljritd~ tJo 7. VARIOUS FINANCIAL ORGANIZATIONS $440.00 Aclcnd Ilem._ 8. CITY & STATE MAGAZINE $25.00 l f 1110'__'--- c~A - q ADMINISTRATIVE] ASSISTANT: 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 ~L 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.00 THE FOLLOWING ARE PAYROLL RELATEDi 3. COBRA NOTIFICATION SERVICE $828.00 4. AMERICAN PAYROLL ASSOCIATION $125.00 RECORDS MANAGER] 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.00 3. ASSOC. OF RECORDS MGRS. & ADMINISTRATORS $120.00 APPOINTMENT OF AGENTS MANAGERi 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 II 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.00 TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT $4,936.45 DEPT. M2 - COMMERCIAL & LAND DEPARTMENT APPRAISAL SUPERVISOR - DAVID STROTHERt 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.00 3. TEXAS ASSOC OF APPRAISAL DISTRICTS $45.00 4. URBAN LAND INSTITUTE $120.00 SENIOR APPRAISER - CHERYL MARTINI 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.00 APPRAISER - GEORGE CLERIHEWI 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.00 APPRAISER - CIAIRE HANCOCKI 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.00 5137 HEMBERSHIPS, SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) q 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET P2ge 22 ~ EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) 5137 MEIMERSHIPS, SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE) t~ APPRAISER - HERBERT GERSTNERF 1 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.00 a APPRAISER ~ OPEN (REPLACES JOHN LANGFORD)F 1. BOARD OF TAR PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35,00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS ----$45.00 lqcndaNo TOTAL COMMERCIAL & LAND DEPARTMENT $645.00 AgenclyEt3~~_ Ll;lr~ l DEPT. 03 - PERSONAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT APPRAISAL SUPERVISOR - JOHN ENGLANDF 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.00 3. NORTH TEXAS TAAO CHAPTER $10.00 SENIOR APPRAISER - GENE SCRUGGSi 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.00 APPRAISER - MARY BLEVINSi 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.00 APPRAISER - DEBRA GONZALESi 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.00 TOTAL PERSONAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT $330.00 DEPT. 04 - RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT APPRAISAL SUPERVISOR - DEBORAH HILLi 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.00 SENIOR APPRAISER - TERRY HANCOCKF 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.00 APPRAISER - DAVID POSEYj 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.00 APPRAISER - LAURA MOON-NEYF 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35,00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.00 513.7 MElBERSHIPSF SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) ,Y 4 'T 1 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 23 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ' ACCT CLASSIFICATION ACCOUNT OR TOTAL {DEGREASED) 5137 MEMBERSHIPS, SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE) APPRAISER - KIM POSEYi 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $35,00 $45.00 , APPRAISER r- KAREN SINGLETONr 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $35.00 $45,00 , APPRAISER - ROGER NARRISr 11 f 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS ent;a fJol-~C7__".Q: 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $35,00 $45.00 A(wnr':.Eihni_ 1 . APPRAISER - CfMISTY SANDERSs 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $35.00 L 6 $45.00 U APPRAISER - GENE XEYs 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $49,00 APPRAISAL SUPPORT CLERK - STEPHANIE NARTINEZ: 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.@0 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT ---$800.00 DEPT. #5 - DATA PROCESSING DEPARTMENT DATA PROCESSING SUPERVISOR - LINDA MCCORMICK 1. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.00 TOTAL DATA PROCESSING DEPARIISNTs --$45. 00 DEPT #7 - APPRAISAL SUPPORT DEPARTMENT ' APPRAISAL SUPPORT MANAGER - RUDY DURHAfli 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35,00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45,00 SR SUPPORT & COLLECTION CLERK - DONNA DYE 1. 40ARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $45.00 S45.00 SR SUPPORT & COLLECTION CLERK - S. TUMLINSON 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS $41.;,00 5137 MEMBERSHIPS, SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) E 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET A $age 24 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCT CLASSIFICATION ATOTAL (DECREASED) N 5137 MEMBERSHIPS, SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE) SR SUPPORT & COLLECTION CLERK - C. BRADSHAW 1. BOARD OF TAX PROFESSIONAL EXAMINERS $35.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ASSESSING OFFICERS _--$45 00 - 4 TOTAL APPRAISAL SUPPORT DE?ARTMENTr $320.00 TOTAL THIS LINE ITEM $7,076.45 ! 4 5138 TRAINING - SCHOOLS, CONFERENCES & TRAVEL 1993 BUDGET - $23,285.00 ($4,415.00) 1992 BUDGET - $27000.00 THIS ACCOUNT IS CHARGED FOR ALL EDUCATIONAL RELATED TRAINING AND TRAVEL. THE TRIPS TO AUSTIN TO PROTEST THE STATE PROPERTY TAX BOARD VALUE FINDINGS ARE ALSO r CHARGED TO THIS ACCOUNT. ~(lgrr/a No.l #1 -ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT Alj~qoj !111111 U.1 ~ DEPT. 12.110 CHIEF APPRAISER-JOE ROGER3 1. TWO (2) TRIPS TO AUSTIN FOR SPTU PROTESTS $400.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF APPRAISAL DISTRICT ANNUAL MEETING IN AUSTIN $400.00 3. COMPTROLLER'S APPRAISAL DISTRICT OPERATIONS ANNUAL SEMINAR IN AUSTIN $350.00 4. LBJ INSTITUTE APPRAISAL DISTRICT SEMINAR $350.00 5. TAX COURSE FOR RPA CEU'S $350.00 DEPUTY CHIEF APPRAISER-JOHN BROWN 1. TWO (2) TRIPS M AUSTIN FOR SPTB PROTESTS $400.00 2. TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF APPRAISAL DISTRICT ANNUAL MEETING IN AUSTIN $400.00 3. COMPTROLLER'S APPRAISAL DISTRICT OPERATIONS ANNUAL SEMINAR IN AUSTIN $350.00 4. LBJ INSTITUTE APPRAISAL DISTRICT SEMINAR $350,00 5. REVIEW COURSE FOR CLASS IV RTA CERTIFICA $845.00 6. TAX COURSE FOR RPA CEU'S $350.00 DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION-JOE FORSYTHE 1, ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL ASSESSORS ANNUAL MEETING IN AUSTIN $350,00 2. TAAO TAX COURSE FOR RTA CEU'S $350.00 3. MAKE SCHOOLS & SEMINARS $500.00 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT-KATHY PIERSON 1. PAYROLL ADMINISTRATION COURSE $120.00 2. TARO TAX COURSE $350.00 5138 TRAINING - SCHOOLS, CONFERENCES & TRAVEL (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) r k` 4 t. a n 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Phge 25 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCT CLASSIFICATION ACCOUNT OR TOTAL (DECREASED) 5138 TRAINING - SCHOOLS, CONFERENCES & TRAVEL (CONTINUED FROM-PREVIOUS PAGE) RECORDS MANAGER-TOM HARRIS 1. ASSOC- OF RECC'•TS MGRS, & ADMINISTRATORS $120.00 APPOINTMENT OF &.1-ilPS MANAGER-GINGER BARTLETT 1. SPA REVIEW COURSE $725,00 2. TAX COURSE FOR CEU'S $350.00 - TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT $7,410.00 IUendo No. DEPT. N2 - COMMERCIAL & LAND DEPARTMENT ~~,~rndaItorn- APPRAISAL SUPERVISOR - DAVID STROTHER+ 1. APPRAISAL INSTITUTE COURSE 102 (SPA CEU-S) $500,00 i SENIOR APPRAISER - CHERYL MARTINr 1. APPRAISAL INSTITUTE COURSE 102 (SPA CEU'S) $500.00 APPRAISER - GEORGE CLERIHEW 1. APPRAISAL INSTITUTE COURSE 102 (SPA CEU'S) $500.00 APPRAISER - CLAIRE HANCOCKe 1. SPA CLASS III REVIEW $725.00 2. SPA TRAINING COURSE $350.00 3. SPA TRAINING COURSE $350.00 APPRAISER - HERBERT GERSTNERi 1. SPA TRAINING COURSE $350.00 2. SPA TRAINING COURSE $350.00 APPRAISER - OPEN (REPLACES JOHN LANGFORD)i 1. SPA TRAINING COURSE $350.00 2. SPA TRAINING COURSE $350,00 TOTAL COMMERCIAL & LAND DEPARTMENT $4x325.00 DEPT. #3 - PERSONAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT APPRAISAL SUPERVISOR - JOHN ENGLANVt 1. SPA TRAINING COURSE $350.00 SENIOR APPRAISER - GENE SCRUGGSr 1. SPA TRAINING COURSE $350.00 APPRAISER - MARY BLEVINSi 1. SPA TRAINING COURSE $350.00 5138 TRAINING - SCHOOLS, CONFERENCES & TRAVEL (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) ` c i R . ek 1 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 26 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) 5138 TRAINING - SCHOOLS, CONFERENCES & TRAVEL (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE) APPRAISER - DEBRA GONZALESi y 1. SPA TRAINING COURSE $350.00 l 2. SPA TRAINING COURSE $350.00 TOTAL PEAsbNAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT $11750.00 F DEPT. M4 - RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT APPRAISAL :SUPERVISOR - DEBORAH HILLS NjonSla fJn 1. SUPERVISOR MANGMNT COURSE 401 (SPA CEU'S) $350.00 Agflnd' a 2. PERSONNEL MANGMNT COURSE 402 (RPA CEU'S) $350.00 SENIOR APPRAISER - TERRY HANCOCK, 1. NO REQUIREMENTS FOR 1993 $0.00 APPRAISER - DAVID POSEYr 1. ONE COURSE FOR SPA CEU'S $350.00 APPRAISER - LAURA MOON-KEYS 1. ONE COURSE FOR SPA CEU'S $350.00 APPRAISER - KIM POSEYS 1, ONE COURSE FOR SPA CEU'S $350.00 APPRAISER - KAREN SINGLETONS 1. NO REQUIREMENTS FOR 1993 $0.00 APPRAISER - ROGER HARRISS 1. ONE COURSE FOR RPA CEU'S $350.00 APPRAISER - CHRISTY SANDERSs 1. COURSE 230 $350.00 2. SPA EXAM REVIEW $725,00 APPRAISER - GENE KEYS 1. ONE SPA COURSE $350.00 2. SPA EXAM REVIEW $725.00 APPRAISAL SUPPORT - STEPHANIE MARTINEZS 1. NO REQUIREMENTS FOR 1993 $0.00 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT $4,250.00 - 5138 TRAINING - SCHOOLS, CONFERENCES & TRAVEL (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) 4i t r 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 27 MLANATION OF ERpENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR TOTAL (DECREASED) ACCT CLASSIFICATION --------------------5138 TRAINING - SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & TRAVEL (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE) y DEPT. N5 - DATA PROCESSING DEPARTMENT DATA PROCESSING MANAGER - LINDA MCCOWCK $1,350.00 1. VARIOUS SOFTWARE COURSES SENIOR INFORMATION SPECIALIST - JUDY FRANK 1. VARIOUS SOFTWARE COURSES $900.00 $2,250.00Je~,dailo/ C TOTAL DATA PROCESSING DEPARTMENTI p,t!!;nrYutitie'n z1 ry~, DEPT 07 - APPRAISAL SUPPORT DEPARTMENT APPRAISAL SUPPORT MANAGER - RUDY DURHAM, $250.00 1. STEERING COMMITTEE $500.00 2. RPA/RTA TRAINING SR SUPPORT & COLLECTION CLERK - D. DYE $150.00 1. PC TRAINING COURSE SR SUPPORT & COLLECTION CLERK - S. TUMLISON $150.00 1. PC TRAINING COURSE I SR :SUPPORT & COLLECTION CLERK - C. BRADSHAW $150.00 1. PC TRAINING COURSE PC SPECIALIST - KEN COPE $700.00 1, PC TRAINING COURSE APPRAISAL ASSISTAN`P & COLLECTION CLERK I MARY BETH BRUNER $350.C0 1. TAR COLLECTION COURSE APPRAISAL ASSISTANT & COLLECTION CLERK IY A CAROLYN VANDERSURG $350.00 1. TAX COLLECTION COURSE APPRAISAL ASSISTANT & COLLECTION CLERK I MARGIE LINDLEY $350.00 1, TAX COLLECTION COURSE APPRAISAL ASSISTANT & COLLECTION CLERK I GEORGIA BLACKBURN $350.00 1. TAX COLLECTION COURSE TOTAL APPRAISAL SUPPORT DEPARTMENTi $3,300.00 TOTAL TRAINING - ACCT M 5138 . . . • • • . . $23,285.00 $23,285 h` r, 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 28 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR ArCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) 5139 POSTAGE & FREIGHT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1993 BUDGET ■ $67,088.00 $4,990.00 1992 BUDGET r $62,098.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM IS COMPRISED OF THE FOLLOWING: (1) REAPPRAISAL NOTICES, WHICH ARE MAILED TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AND AGENTS ON HAY 15THi 1851000 NOTICES @ $.30 EA . . . . . . . $55,500.00 a (2) GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE, WHICH INCLUDES LETTERS & PACKAGES. . . . . . . $21000.00 (3) SUPPLEMENTAL VALUE NOTICES, WHICH ARE SENT r~ APPROXIMATELY 9 TIMES: / !y)en:l:3 11u( 3,000 NOTICES @ $.30 EA . . $900.00 Z (4) CERTIFIED MAIL FOR ARB ACTIVITY . . . . $2,000.00 p,41,;rrl3f~rri._.. (5) LETTERS SOLICITING SALES INFORMATION. . $2,900.00 (6) SENDING CHECKS TO PAY BILLS . . . . . . $600.00 (7) POSTAGE MACHINE RENTAL. . . . . . . . . $588:00 (8) POSTAGE BOX RENTAL (2 EA. @ $340) . . . $680.00 (9) POSTAGE MACHINE MAINTENANCE . . . . . . $480.00 NEW ITEM: (10) NEWSLETTER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,440.00 TOTAL POSTAGE & FREIGHT - ACCT @ 5139. . . . $67,088.00 rrrsrrrrr■ 5141 LEGAL NOTICES & ADVERTISING. . . . . . . . . 1993 BUDGET r $90500.00 $6,500.00 1992 BUDGET r $3,000.00 THIS ACCOUNT I3 CHARGED FOR ADVERTISEMENTS IN NEWSPAPERS CONCERNING EXEMPTION MATTERS SUCH AS HOMESTEADS, OVER-65, DISABLED VETERANS, AND PRODUCTIVITY VALUATION MATTERS. OTHER ADVERTISEMENTS HAVE TO DO WITH APPRAISAL REVIEW NOTICES, MISCELLANEOUS CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING, - AND INVITATIONS TO BID. ADDITIONAL MANDATED ADVERTISING IS INCREASING THIS ACCOUNT SIGNIFICANTLY. BEGINNING IN 1992, THERE WILL BE THREE ARB RELATED ADS THAT WILL RUN IN THREE NEWSPAPERS FOR A COST OF APPROXIMATELY $2,250. THE AUDITED EXPENSES FOR THIS ITEM FOR 1991 WAS $7,218. TOTAL LEGAL NOTICES & ADVER - ACCT aw 5141. $90500.00 rrrrrrrrr C i n i1 1 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET rage 29 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITUMS, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCT CLASSIFICATION ACCOUNT OR TOTAL (DECREASED) ---------5--------- 5143 ELECTRICITY, WATER & SEWER 2993 BUDGET i' 531,920,15 $8,708,15 1992 BUDGET - $23,212,00 THE AUDITED 1991 AMOUNT FOR THIS ACCOUNT WAS $26,920,15, ADDITIONAL, FUNDS ARE BEING BUDGETED FOR THE NEW STORAGE BUILDING, e ELECTRICITY, WATER & SEWER - MAIN OFFICE BLDG $26,920.15 {inut,a No C' ELECTRICITY - NEW STORAGE BLDG $51000.00 gUa!vl It2ni._)) TOTAL ELECTRICAL' WATER & SEWER - ACCT 0 5143 $311,,920.920.15 RJ 5145 TELEPHONE. . , . . , , . , /l/1 J 1993 BUDGET - $27,708,44 ($4,819.84) (1) LOCAL LINES - DENTON 0566-09041 1992 BUDGET - $32,528.28 $384.32 PER M0. X 12 MOS. - $4,611.84 (2) LOCAL LINES - LEWISVILLE 0(214) 221-68781 $292.33 PER NO. X 12 MOS, - $3,507.96 LESSI 501 ALLOCATED TO TAX COLLECTIONS ($1,753.98) (3) METRO LINE - DENTON 0434-80161 $186.41 PER M0. X 12 MOS. - $2,2:5,92 (4) METRO SERVICE 0434-2602. FOUR OUTGOING AND EIGHT INCOMING LINESI $388.00 PER M0. X 12 MOS, w $4,656.00 (5) LANG DISTANCE CALLS $600.00 PER N0. X 12 MOS, - $7,200.00 (6) DATA LINES-DENTON/LEWISVILLE 0L00-3333r $240.88 PER W. X 12 MOS. - $2,890.56 LESS' 501 ALLOCATED TO TAX COLLECTIONS ($1,445.28) (7) DATA LINES-DENTON/LEWISVILLE 0I.00-36461 $225,70 PER N0• X 12 MOS, $2,708.40 LESSr 50% ALLOCATED 710 TAX COLLECTIONS ($1,354.20) (8) CONTRACTED MAINTENANCEr $574.23 PER QTR, X 4 QTRS. - $2,296.92 (9)-AT&T LANGUAGE INTERPRETING LINEr $25.00 PER N0. X 12 MOS. - $300,00 (10) MULTI-BUTTON PHONE (REPLACES SINGLE BUTTON)1 $200.00 EA. X 8 SETS - $1,600.00 (11) LOCAL DIRECTORIES $253.30 TOTAL TELEPHONE - ACCT 0 5145 . . . . . . , . $27,708,44 r, wrraru rr■ i. a a~ YYi 1 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 30 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) 5146 BUILDING & GROUNDS MAINTENANCE. . . . . . . . 1993 BUDGET w $33,365.00 $40600.00 Z 1992 BUDGET + $28,765.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM COMPRISES ALL BUILDING AND GROUNDS j MAINTENANCE. AT SOME POINT IN THE NEAR FUTURE, THERE WILL HAVE APO BE SUBSTANTIAL FUNDS SPENT ON REPLACING , PART, OR ALL OF, THE AIR CONDITIONING UNITS. s~laF,u NOTEi THE 1991 AUDITED EXPENSES FOR THIS ACCOUNT Arlen I J WERE $44,371.96. t?eIe _ ,L/ C f SECTION I - BUILDING SERVICES (1) BUILDING CLEANINGi (1A) JANITORIAL SERVICE (CONTRACTED) PER MONTH X MONTHS TOTAL $1,200.00 12 $14,400.00 (1B) JANITORIAL SUPPLIES PER MONTH X MONTHS TOTAL $75.00 12 $900.00 (10 REFUSE (TRASH) PICK UP PER MONTH X MONTHS - TOTAL $25.00 --12-- --^$300.00 (1D) EXTERMINATING INTERIOR OF BUILDING PER MONTH X MONTHS TOTAL $75.00 12 Y -$900.00 TOTAL BUILDING CLEANING. . . . . . . . (1) ■ $16,500.00 (2) BUILDING, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING MAINTENANCE] . . . . . . . . . (2) ■ $2,000.00 (3) ALARM MAINTENANCEi (3A) FIRE ALARM MAINTENANCE. . . . $480.00 (3B) BURGLAR AND FIRE ALARM MONITORING $720.00 TOTAL ALARM MAINTENANCE. . . . . . . . (3) $1,200.00 C 5146 BUILDING & GROUNDS MAINTENANCE (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) 4 r. t 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET No 31 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURDS, INCREASES AND DECREASES 1 INCREASED ACCT CLASSIFICATION ACCOUNT OR - TOTAL (DECREASED) 5146 BUILDING & GROUNDS MAINTENANCE (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE) _ (4) AIR CONDITIONING/HEATING MAINTENANCEi (0) QUARTERLY 1AINTENANCE CONTRACT r;Jenda Nd " r ~.1 I PER QUARTER X QUARTERS TOTAL [,k) till $150.00 a (4B) SUHM/WINTER CHANGE OVER $600. PER QUARTER X QUARTERS TOTAL $285.00 - $1,140.00 I (4C) ADDITZONAL SERVICE --PER-HOUR- X HOURS « TOTAL $35.00 10 $350.00 (4D) EMGENCY AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS . . . $2,500.00 ( TOTAL AIR CONDITIONING & HEATING MAINT . (4) - $4,590.00 l NEW ITEHi (5) VARIOUS BUILDING REPAIRS . . . . . . (5) . $4,0W,00 TOTAL SECTION I . . . . .(1)+(2)+(3)+(4)+(5) - $28,290.00 SECTION II - GROUNDS MAINTENANCE SERVICE (6) "OWING & TRIMMING SERVICE (6A) LAWN MOWING & FLOWER BED MAINTENANCE PER-?IONTH X HONTHS « TOTAL ---i0 - $425.00 $4,250.00 (6B) "OWING REAR OF LOT WITH TRACTOR PER11ONTH X MONTHS TOTAL $6 $450.00 TOTAL MOWING & TRIMMING SERVICE . . . . .(6) _ -$4,70@.00 5146 BUILDING & GROUNDS MAINTENANCE (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) c 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 32 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCT CLASSIFICATION ACCOUNT OR TOTAL (DECREASED) 5146 BUILDING S GROUNDS MAINTENANCE (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE) (7) WEED AND ANT CONTROL DURING SPRING, SUMMER C AND FALL, da N COST PER TREATT ZJ X TREATMENTS TOTAL W1r, ` - L.U $75,00 3 (7) ■ $225.00 rf ` ~t ` I (8) PURCHASE OF FLAGS. . . . . . . . . . (e) $150.00 TOTAL SECTION II. . . . . . . , ,(6)+(7)+(e) $5,075.00 ,r TOTAL BLDG & GROUNDS MAINT - ACCT A 5146 $33,36500 rrrurrrr. ~ 5148 APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD . . 1993 BUDGET r $22,680.00 50.00 1992 BUDGET ■ $22,680.00 J THIS BUDGET ITEM IS CHARGED FOR PAYMENTS TO ARB MEMBERS 1 FOR WORK DURING THE MANDATED VALUE EQUALIZATION PROCESS. r (1) (lAY, JUNE AND JULY MEETINGS, NUMBER OF PAY PER NUMBER OF TOTAL -MEMBERS- X DAY EA. X _MEETINGS - PAY 9 $80.00 25 $18,000.00 (2) FOUR (4) SUPPLEMENTAL ALL DAY MEETINGS: NUMBER OF PAY PER NUMBER 0? TOTAL -MEMBERS- X DAY-EA. _ X -MEETINGS PAY 9 $80.00 4 $2,880.00 (3) FIVE (5) SUPPLEMENTAL HALF DAY MEETINGS, NUMBER OF PAY PER NUMBER OF TOTAL -MEMBERS- X DAY-EA. _ X MEETINGS - PAY 9 $40.00 5 - 81,800.00 TOTAL APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD - ACCT 4 5148 5221650.00 rsrrrrrns■ 1 ti S . I 1 A 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Page 33, EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES INCREASED ACCT CLASSIFICATION ACCOUNT OR TOTAY )DECREASED) G 5152 CONTINGENCY. , . . . . . . . . . 1993 BUDGET r $30,000.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM WILL REMAIN THE SAME, 1992 BUDGET - $30' d F ' ~3 J I FUNDS FOR UNANTICIPATED EXPENDITURES . . v • $30,000.00 rlgpnila I1o'~ a=:rrrro"a , LLto L -C - 5153 BUILDING & LAND PAYMENT. . . . . . . . . . . 1993 IPJDGET ■ $59,085.00 $0.00 1992 BUDGET - $59,088.00 THIS ACCOUNT IS CHARGED FOR THE PAYMENTS ON THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT'S BUILDING AND LAND NOTE, MONTHLY NUMBER OF TOTAL -PAYMENTS R MONTHS X ACCT 5153 - $4,924.00 ---12 $59,088,00 5154 BUILDING & LAND IMPROVEMENTS . , . , , . . , 1993 BUDGET = $27,000,00 $1,710.00 1992 BUDGET - $25,290.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM IS CHARGED FOR VARIOUS BUILDING AND LAND IMPROVEMENTS. (1) STORAGE BUILDING - 24' X 48', WIRED AND AIR CONDITIONED . . . . . . . . . . . . . $25,020.00 (2) LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS . . , . , , . , $2,000 00 TOTAL BLDG & LAND IMPR - ACCT 4 5154 . . . . $271000.00 rr"NSS="rN 5155 MISCELLANEOUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193 BUDGET - $7,605.00 $175.00 1992 BUDGET ■ $7,430,00 ITEMS THAT WILL NOT FIT WELL IN ANOTIIER CATEGORY. (1) BANK SERVICE CHARGE. . , . . , , . , , , $300.00 (2) FILM & FILM PROCESSING , . . . . , $10000.00 (3) MISCELLANEOUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,000.00 (4) COE-FEE CUPS. . . . . . . . . $180.00 (5) REIMBURSING UNEMPL.OYKENT . . . . . . $5,000.00 l' (6) SAFE DEPOSIT BOX FOR COMPUTER TAPES. , , $125.00 y TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS - ACCT 4 5155. $7,605.00 ".""Noun= Y. r' t) ~j A 1993 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET P 4 Ala ~~s?~ g _3,. Atlo7da ) EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES F' nf3fl+lll3f11.. Ik7U7 L1C1CREASED ACCOUNT ' ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (15EC1 ED) 4 5156 OTHER ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1993 BUDGET , $700.00 $0.00 1992 BUDGET a $700.00 THIS ACCOUNT IS USED TO PURCHASE MINOR ASSETS, j (1) MEASURING WHEEISe QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE w TOTAL - - $100.00 5 $500.00 (2) 100 FOOT MEASURING TAPESe ~I QUANTITY X UNIT PRICE w TOTAL 10 $20.00 $200.00 TOTAL OTHER ASSETS - ACCT 0 5156 . . . . . . $700.00 wowww■ y. , C 5 i n ISMS c, r3 `I f I f DENTON CINTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT Page, 5~_ 1993 APPRRIBAL BUOOIT ALLOCATIO18 WOHKSHIIT 4 ALL VIOURIS ARI ISTINATIB L1.1..- I OF DENTON OUT OF (,la 1993 1992 TOTAL COUNTY COURTY BUDCIT 1/ JURISDICTIONS TAX LEVY LIVIIB CBARGIS CHAROIS ALLOCATIOHB 4D { SCHOOL DISIRICT81 4 oil ARGYLE IBD........ 321319,856.17 112191 $21,945.51 $2),94851 1 312 AUBRIY ISO...,,..... 3962,283.42 1.5161 $11,591.93 511,541.43 SIS DINTON 10 $31,328,812,62 16.4681 3311,395.66 $371,395,66 i S11 XRUN [SD.,......... 3911,123.65 1.4181 511,962.41 311,962.41 SIB LAAE DALLAS ISO...., $3,162,971.61 1,9101 $15,329.81 $15,324,81 619 LINISVILLI ISO,...... 363,118,131.58 33.1191 9161,339 14 $761,339,14 ell LITTLE ILK ISO....... 31,2651954,95 16651 BIS,25165 $15,251.15 Bll HORtEWEBT ISO,....... 5948651422195 5.1661 1118184169 355,412.76 $1144314,45 Sit PILO? POINT ISO,..... $1,592,913.49 1,8371 $19,188.68 111,725,36 $29,914.14 $13 PONDIR ISO.,......... $556,411.31 1.2924 $6,712.66 96,712.68 $14 SANGIR ISO........... 51,8841271.98 119911 922,69846 5224698.46 SCHOOL DISTRICTS TOTALS 811745671141,72 61.8111 31,416,215.97 366,198.12 511482,444.19 Gil DENTON COUNTY 928,)11,f68.64 15,6911 9345181953 $1.11 5345,819.53 CITIISr (26 CITY Of ARGYLE.....,. $232,511.35 1.1221 32,811.88 32,811,68 Cq CI11 Of AUBRIY......, $83,111.32 1,0441 91,N1.13 SI,16113 C31 TOWN Of BARTONVILLI.. $611598.98 1,1361 $814.31 $814,31 C13 CITY Of Tel COLONY,,. 93,812,113.83 2,1351 $46,644.46 $46,644.46 C14 TOWN Of COR]NTB...,.. $121,132,68 1,3191 $0,674.92 $8,674.92 CIS CITY Of DENTON....... 513,468,663.33 7,1811" $162,241.35 31621141.35 C30 CITY OF DOUBLI OAK... 9153,129,25 1,181E $1,843.43 $1,843.43 C11 CITY Of FLOWIR KOUND, 341257,311.91 2,2381 3511284.61 $511281.6) C22 TOO Of 8ACKBIRRY..., $11,161.12 1.1161 1134.44 $134.14 C19 TOO Of 81CXO11 CRIII 32524651.42 1.1331 $3,143,51 $3,143.51 CIB CITY Of BIGILAND %'j, 1202171186.81 . 11914 $27,438.86 $21,438.86 C09 City of JUSTTR.,,.,,, 989,342,95 1,1411 311116,25 $1,176,25 Cie CITY Of ARUOIRVILLE.. $26,716.94 1.1141 $321.83 $32183 CIO CITY Of KRUK,...,.... 996,16361 1,1511 51,158.41 $1115841 ell CITY Of LAKI DALLAS,, $121,919.82 1.2211 $5,911,51 $5,171.51 C25 CITY Of LAXIWDOD VILO 022,711,19 1.1121 3213157 $27357 C12 CITY Of LINISVILLI... 311,321,519.21 5,9511 $136,382.12 n2,36 31361464.18 CH CITY Of LITTLE ILK... 3124,129.41 1,1601 51,556.25 31,556.25 C23 CITY Of KASSIALL CRX, 95,91712 1.1131 $7115 $1115 C33 to" Of NOHTILAXB.., $51,692.33 1,1171 $611.65 $611.65 C24 CITY Of OAX POINT.... $11,11119 1,1311 $856.63 $056,63 elf CITY Of PILOT PONT.. $31211N.31 1,1641 93,767,16 33,161.!6 CIS CITY Of PONDER...... $141593.61 1,1181 $115,79 3115.14 C17 CITY Of ROAHO1E...... 3321,123.38 1.1681 33,856.14 93,656,29 C16 CITY OF SANGBR....... $322,516.66 11711 $30885,8S $3,885.85 C28 CITY Of TROPSY CLUB.. $611,861,38 13161 $7,251.19 $1,251.19 CITIES TOPALB 534,212,189,55 21,6171 3472,241.61 $8236 $472,32291 i" 3 ~ :r L` DINION CINIRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT 9 36 1993 APPRAISAL BUDGIT ALLOCATIONS NORE8811T Aorda No A - ALL IIGURIS ARI 1811KATIB Agond,~ 11t!m - ~ILI- i 11 DBNTOM OUT 01 {Nio __.}q43 1992 TOTAL COUNTY COUNTY BUDOIT JURISDIC1I018 TAX LIVY LIVIIS CSARG88 COAP919 ALLOCATIONS SPICIAL DISTRICIlt N14 CLTARCRIBI NATIRSBRD AUTBORITY..r.,r..... $16,114.21 I,IIRI 1192.91 9192,91 N47 CORINTB MUD.......... 92291591.34 1.1211 $2,769.32 $2,769.)2 111 DINTON COUNTY 1101 DISTR[CT........... 8331919.53 1,1181 $418.91 $488.91 Lll DINTON COUNTY LIVY IMPNOVINIMT DIST 11, 1146,849.52 1.1771 $1,768,99 $1,768.99 V45 DIMTOM COUNTY MUD 12. 0668,978.51 1.3521 $8,155 22 980158.22 BUD VINTON COUNTY ROAD 4 UTILITY DISTRICT IL $1,681,111.69 1.8831 $21,238.98 121,238.98 RI1 DINION CO RICLAMATIOM / ROAD i UTILITY DIST. 1981,199.81 1.5151 $11,816.56 $11,816,56 i WIZ LAIR CITIBB MUA...... $38,545'.34 1.1241 $164.31 1461.32 N13 TWIT CLUB MUD...,,. $966,589.17 1,5181 $11,643,81 $186.52 111,831.32 SPICIAL DISTRICTS TOTALS $4,761,973.99 2,5131 $570352.11 $186.52 $57,518.51 GRAND TOTALS 1191,237,773,91 111.1111 $2,291,651.12 166,167.11 $2,358,125.12 u+uuar+aur a+oor as+aauuaau atar+r+ua - rar azu auro + 1 I r~ ~ II j inn ~a 4 SALARIES SCHEDULE Ar~nnda Plo. C1~-mow Page 37 Agentl1llo n,_ _l 49~- TITLE (I1^ )fin/ l ~C 4)-SALARY fC1 ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTr CHIEF APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $59,256.42 DEPUTY CHIEF APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 948,232.15 DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . $46,802.03 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825,442.94 RECORDS MANAGER. . . . . . . . . . . . . $26,780.00 SUPPLEMENTS & AGENT FORMS MANAGER. . . . . . . . . . . 528,840.00 ARB SECRETARY & LIAISON OFFICER. . . . . . . . . . . . 53,090.00 COMMERCIAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENTi " APPRAISAL SUPERVISOR-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY . . . . . . . $41,271.63 SENIOR COMMERCIAL APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $29,476.15 COMMERCIAL APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923,074.58 COMMERCIAL APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919,527.56 "OMMERCIAL APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . . . . $23,074.56 COMMERCIAL APPRAISER (HALF TIME EMPLOYEE). . . . . $100000.00 INFORMATION SPECIALIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $170172.58 LAND DFPARTMENTt APPRAISAL SUPERVISOR - LAND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $44,000.00 SENIOR LAND APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $30,666.66 LAND APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $25,505.83 1 PERSONAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENTi APPRAISAL SUPERVISOR-PERSONAL PROPERTY . . . . . . . . $37,249.67 SENIOR APPRAISER-PERSONAL PROPERTY . . . . . . . . . . $26,866.16 PERSONAL PROPERTY APPRAISER . . . . . : . . . . . . . . $19,198.95 PERSONAL PROPERTY APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $24,035.08 APPRAISAL ASSISTANT (PART-TIME). . . . . . . . . . . . $3,000.00 INFORMATION SPECIALIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $15,599.57 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT; APPRAISAL SUPERVISOR-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. . . . . . . 537,972.02 SENIOR APPRAISER-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. . . . . . . . . $27,607.75 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . . . $23,527.55 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . . . $23,0B2.43 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . . . $19,527.56 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . . . $23,074.58 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . . . 018,889.86 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . . . $17,859.49 APPRAISAL SUPPORT CLERK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $14,504.65 INFORMATION SPECIALIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915,599.57 APPRAISAL SUPPORT DEPARTMENTi APPRAISAL SUPPORT MANAGER. . . . . . . $410271.63 SENIOR APPRAISAL SUPPORT & COLLECTION CLERK. $22,050.00 SENIOR APPRAISAL SUPPORT & COLLECTION CLERK/SO. OFFICE $22,050.00 APPRAISAL SUPPORT & COLLECTION CLERK . . . . . . . . . $20,019.87 APPRAISAL SUPPORT & COLLECTION CLERK . . . . . . . . . $12,858.70 APPRAISAL SUPPORT & COLLECTION CLERK . . . . . $12,858.70 APPRAISAL SUPPORT & COLLECTION CLERK/S0. OFFICE. . . . 912,858.70 , APPRAISAL SUPPORT & COLLECTION CLERK/SO. OFFICE. . . . $12,858.70 \ RECEPTIONIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $14,809.65 C011TINUED ON NEXT PAGE r Y` Orr i.'.1 > 1'd VL i. 1 ~ . 'A V. 1@ ^ t c CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE DATA PROCESSING PERSONNEL: ~~~s40,0b9.55 Z 1, DATA PROCESSING MANAGER. . . . . • • • ' 122;6b8;9'f. SENIOR INFORMATION SPECIALIST. $22, 896.781-rj MICROCOMPUTER SPECIALIST RESEARCH & TRANSFER PERSONNEL: 829,382.43 RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECH III • • . • • . ' ' • $20,623.05 017,473.17 SENIOR RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECH II , RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECHNICIAN 1517,473,17 RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECHNICIAN I . • . • • • RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECHNICIAN I . • • • . ' • • 016014,,130966..96 6 . . . . . , . . 52 RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECHNICIAN I t 81,2251.128.52 TOTAL r~.~rrrrr.+rrrr P I 1 h A E 9 r, i i 1 A MIE - C I TX-- C4UNCI] . I Till T' IT IT y+-rye-~-- l MIM - 0O~o0o P 0 6 00: 0 e 0+;- ^ t L i 4 .1 r~ j.._U rr CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNWIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76101 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8100 f MEMORANDUM DATES July 10, 1992 TOs Betty McKean, Executive Director ° Municipal Services/Economic Development FROMi Thomas W. Rlinck, Human Resources Director SUBJECTi SUMMARY OF EFFORTS TO ATTRACT PROTECTED CLASS INDIVIDUALS FOR FIRE RECRUIT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION The City of Denton Fire Department has made significant attempts to bring qualified protected class individuals into the Fire Department. Unfortunately, with the restrictions of the employment process governed by the State civil Service Law and the new Civil Rights Act of 1991, these attempts have not been successful. This memo will summarize the efforts made throughout fiscal year 1991-92, the results of the most recent Fire Recruit entrance examination, and the barriers that exist in hiring a protected class individual from this list. CjW1TINO EFFORTS The Personnel, Police and Fire Departments have coordinated recruiting activities at universities whose populations are predominantly protected class. These universities includes o Sam Houston State University o Lamar University c Paul Quinn University o East Texas State University o Prairie View A & M University o Laredo State University o Pan American University o Texas A & I ' o Texas College o Texas Woman's University o Jarvis Christian College o Wiley College o Northeast Louisiana State University o Grambling State University o Tyler Junior College Out of 711 individuals from these institutions expressing an interest in the City of Denton as a potential employer, 531 were of a protected class. The breakdown of these students is as follower APP001FI r k . 3 a J lot da NOC C-7 AilU~irl:~~((ilera-l. I1 -1 Memo - Betty McKean Mlle „U. _ 1-J--q July 10, J.992 Pags 2 African American H57 panic Ca18c0asian Otther Male 172 39 109 13 Female Other recruiting efforts includes v o Minority Job Expo at Southwest Texas State University o Cinco De Mayo Festival in Denton adio o uni.vercitiesawithjob linessnotified ofeupcomingnexaminationio station o Recruiting night at Martin Luther King Jr. (MLK) Recreation Center of these, the Minority Job Expo was the most successful. A total of 141 a individuals expressed an interest in employment with the City of Denton. However, due to the volume of participants, it was not possible to obtain as exact summary of the diversity of the group. The other recruiting efforts tdid he not appear to spark a significant amount of interest. Five applications for re examination ted ere distributed at the Cinco De Mayo Festival and eight li ~ M at the KLX Center. In order to sell the organization to quality applicants, it was important that quality recruiting material be used. Therefore, a new recruiting brochure was developed and printed describing an exciting career with the City of Denton Fire attract e individuals to top display eCity of board Denton recr lti g t ble,dieplay pictures to. The Fire Department also offered an orientation session and study tutorial for any interested applicant. Sixty attended. J' Z_XAK1AAZ1_M_RF' -q A total of 240 individuals took the Fire Recruit entrance examination administered breakdown Juno 6# 1992. is as O fothe 223 that passed, 31 (14%) were in a protected class African American b Hispanic 8 Native American 5 Female (Caucasian) 12 As indicated on the attached eligibility list summary, the highest rank of a protected class individual is seven (7) with a score of 93. Of the 22 individuals who tie for this rank, one is an Hispanic male and one a Native American male . individual s higher Nineoindividuals ntie in ranking eight s(8), with one )being in a protected class. Similar results existed in the entry examination administered October 1989 and November were in 1989, a protected class Ar in tested 1991, 30 passed. ( 18) of those passed 13 the 225 ,,:ho passed the examination were in a protected class. A chart Is also attached which compares other areacitytedre de into p rtmen s to Denton. As 'fire departments exists throughout ther bringing pr APP001F1. 4 Y. i Memo - Betty McKean p}r,ntk3= x July 10, 1992 L ~I_~, Page 3 C1alo LEGAL ISSUES The Fire Department's employment process is governed under Chapter 143 of the Texas Local Government Code (Sections 143.021 - 143.026), In surnvaary, this law mandatest G c A position may be filled only from an eligibility list that results from an examination. o An eligibility list may be created only as a result of a competitive examination held in the presence of eech applicant for the position. 9 o The entrance examination must be open, competitive and free to each i person who makes proper application. o An applicant may not take an examination unless a least one other applicant taking the examination is present. (Examinations for beginning positions in the fire department may be held at different a locations if each applicant takes the same examination and is examined in the presence of other applicants.) o The eligibility list shall be kept in existence for a period of not less than six months or more than twelve months unless the names of all applicants on the list have 'seen referred. The commission shall I determine the length of the period. i o Each applicant 'e,grade on the written examination is based on a maximum grade of 100 percent and is determined entirely by the correctness of the applicant's answers to the questions. Tho minimum passing gre'-1e fs 70 percent. o To fill a beginning position, the (Civil Service) director shall certify to the municipality's chief executive the names of the three persons having the highest grades on the eligibility list. o From the three names certified, the chie4 executive shall appoint the person having the highest grade unless there is a valid reason why the person having the second or third highest grade should be appointed. Another law that has a significant impact on the hiring process is the Civil Rights Act of 1991. This law states: "It shall be an unlawful employment practice for a respondent, in connection " with the selection or referral of applicants or candidates for employment or promotion, to adjust the scores of, use different cutoff scores for, or otherwise alter the results of, employment related tests on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or, national, origin." It also states "Except as otherwise provided in this title, an unlawful employment practice in established when the complaining party demonstrates that race, color, religion, sex or national origin was a motivating factor for any employment practice, even though other factors also motivated the practice." In brder to try to change some of the laws that create barriers to protected class hiring, the Texas Municipal League (TML) introduced a bill to the State Legislature in the 1991 session. This hill would allow the adoption of APFOOM S r I i I 1W,1 NO., - Memo - ertty McKean fails_ July 10, 1992 Page 4 Affirmative Action Programs to select individuals pursuant to an Affirmative Action Program. However, they were unsuccessful in obtaining a hearing for this l bill. OPTIONS Some options are offered below to hire protected class individuals into the Fire Department. The consequences of each of these are also outlined. a O IWI I - Invalidate current eligibility list and QIye another examiration' This examination could be given at a location outside of Denton designed to attract a larger number of protected class individuals to take the examination. (For example, a university with a predominantly African American student populationp or at Southwest Texas State University in San Marcos which already attracts a large number of protected class individuals at the annual Minority Job Expo. Consewences 1. Unless the test was administered in an area that had a predominantly protected class population, there would be no guarantee that giving another test would produce the desired results. 2. A significant increase in expenses would be incurred for the following reasons: a) Cost to purchase additional tests 1 (The cost of the test is $25 for, the first 10 and $10 for each additional examination. If 250 more individuals were tested, the cost would be $2,650 plus shipping. Approximately this amount of money has already been spent for the June examination.) b) Travelling costa for test administrators and proctors (Approximately three days would be needed to prepare for and administer the examination. If 250 applicants are anticipated, approximately nine people would be needed to proctor, administer and score the examination,) c) Possible charges for testing facility d) Costs for additional advertising to attract a large turnout 3. The Civil Service Law mandates that an eligibility list is valid for no less than 6 months or more that 12 months, to be determined by the Civil service commission. The length of the list is determined prior to posting the examination. The Fire Department generally does not have many vacancies to fill, thus not needing to test frequently. Therefore, the Commission determined the current list be approved for 12 months. Unless there is a valid reason to pass over every person on the list, by law, this list is in effect for one year. 4. A negative image may occur from the citizens for making tho hiring process more difficult for Denton citizens. APP001FI C ti K . r r~ienrl3 p1p, r n( eruH.1 Am cf l Memo - Betty McKean X115 - YC(c _ July 300 1992 11 Page 5 5. It is anticipated the Fire Fighters Association on both the local and state level would in~.ervene on behalf of the individuals not selected. option-11- Pass over, individuals on the eligibility list to rote a t individuals., As stated 24 e previously, people would be passed over before the first protected class individual could be considered. Consequences 1. There is no guarantee the highest ranked protected class Individual c ; would pass all portions of the selection process (i.e. physical ability test, medical examination, background check). 2. This would be in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 referenced ~ above which prohibits employment practices or altering the results of employment related tests on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or na.,ional origin. 3. This option would also be in violation of the civil Service Law that { mandates the person with the highest score be hired unless a valid reason exists to pass that person over. 4. As in option 1, it is anticipated the Fire Fighters Association on both the local and state level would intervene on behalf of the individuals not selected. 5. The City of Tyler recently lost a lawsuit to the District Court for passing individuals over to hire a protected class individual. This suit is currently being appealed in Federal Court. Option III - DQ not hire off this list and wait until list expires !June 1993), Conseouences { 1. Although no legal ramifications exist, if no one is hired off this list, no staffing would exist for the new fire station. 2. As stated above, the cost to test 250 applicants icy $2,650 plus shipping. Approximately'this amount of money has already been spent to give the last examination. 3. A failure to hire will not allow the Fire Department to substantially I reduce overtime costs, which is a current budget issue. v option ZV - Hire oft the current_ eligibility list as normal and in accordance with the laws. c~onseauences 1. No leg.%l ramifications would exist and proper staffing would occur. 2. This option would perpetuate the problem of having no protected class individuals in sworn positions in the Fire Department. 0_2tion V - Hire enouo staff off tha current eligibility list to reduce the gvvertime problem, bu do of hire additional staff until after current list expires.. After the current list expires, we can look at either testing at APP001FI s pw~ i. rt A(IP,11fId NU ~ Afer~ifA Ilo7~~~ Menlo - Betty McKean July 10, 1992 811,9 -•b _ ~,i` Page 6 (0 t a predominantly protected class population area, or once again try to change State Legislation. Consequences 1. No legal ramifications would exist and proper staffing would occur. + I 2. No guarantee exists that a bill allowing Affirmative Action Programs would be passed before the next examination was administered (especially with the Civil Rights Act of 1991), 3, As discussed above, significantly higher costs would exist to administer the examination outside the Denton area. However, if the test were not administered outside the Denton area, no guarantee would exist the outcome of the eligibility list would be as desired. I pot o VI =.Create different eliaibility ltste and rotate hirina from eac-h lilt. The City of Beaumont currently uses the practice of having a list of Caucasian males, minority males, and females. As positions become vacant they are filled on a notation basis from the different lists. Conse"ences 1. This would be in violation with the Civil Service Law which basically says that hiring must be done off an eligibility list with the highest scoring person being the first considered unless a valid reason exists to pass over to 09 second highest scoring person. 2. This would al3o be in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 which states that employment practices based on race, gender, religion or national origin are prohibited. 3. Currently Beaumont's Police and Fire Associations are challenging this hiring practice and the results not yet known, This memo clearly outlines the practical preriLcament the City faces to improve its commitment to hire protected class individuals. We have done everything we know to stay within the legal bounds of the law. We are now asking the Council to weigh the pros and cons of the outlined options and make some political decisions in directing the staff to the next step in improving our conunitment to a diversified workforce. If further information is needed, gleaae let me know. Thomas• nc attachments APPOOIFI l ~t ~ EE Arfrnd3l e c, TT ELIGIBILITY LIST SUMMARY j1ij r 4 RANK RACE GENDER SCGRM 1 Caucasian male _ 100 2 Caucasian Male 99 i 3 Caucasian Male 97 _ r 3 Caucasian Male 97 4 Caucasian male 96 4 Caucasian Male 96 4 Caucasian Male 96 4 Caucasian Male 96 4 Caucasian Male 96 5 Caucasian Male 95 5 Caucasian male 95 5 Caucasian. Male 95 5 Caucasian male 95 5 Caucasian Male 95 5 Caucasian Male 95 6 Caucasian Male 94 6 Caucasian Male 94 6 Caucasian Male 94 6 Caucasian Male 94 6 Caucasian Male 94 6 Caucasian Male 94 6 Caucasian Male 94 6 Caucasian male 94 6 Caucasian Male 94 7 Hispanic dale 93 7 Native American hale 93 7 Caucasian male 93 7 Caucasian Male 93 APPOO M C A~ T 4a ' i! F 4 /g1~ IJa hlo. ~ _ RANK RACK OENDER SCORE 7 Caucasian Male 93 7 Caucasian Male 93 Z 1 Caucasian male 93 7 Caucasian Male 93 7 Caucasian Male 93 " I 7 Cauvaelan Male 93 7 Caucasian Male 93 7 Caucasian Male 93 7 Caucasian Male 93 7 Caucasian Male 43 7 Caucasian Male 93 7 Caucasian Male 93 7 Caucasian Male 93 7 Caucasian Male 43 7 Caucasian Male 93 7 Caucasian Male 93 7 Caucasian Male 93 7 Caucasian Male 93 4 Native American male 92 8 Caucasian Male 92 8 Caucasian Male 92 6 Caucasian male 92 8 Caucasian Male 92 9 Caucasian hale 92 9 Caucasian Mals 42 9 Caucasian _Male 92 8 Caucasian male 92 9 His anic Male 91 9 Rim panic male 41 91 Caucasian Halo gl 9 Caucasian Male 41 9 Caucasian Male 91 APPOOM xr is .r f`' n n'anl'I lit h~0__ _ l PAM RACE OENDER sCORR `c 9 Caucasian male 91 9 Caucasian Male 91 9 Caucasian male 91 9 Caucasian male 91 9 Caucasian male 91 t 10 Caucasian male 90 10 Caucasian male 90 10 Caucasian male 90 10 Caucasian male 90 10 Caucasian male 90 10 Caucasian male 90 10 Caucasian male 90 10 Caucasian Male 90 10 Caucasian Male 90 10 Caucasian male 90 10 Caucasian Male 90 11 _ Caucasian Female 99 11 Caucasian Female 89 _ 11 Afriotn Aaaeicar. Male at it Caucasian male 89 11 Caucasian male 89 11 Caucasian male 89 .11 Caucasian male 89 12 Caucasian Mile 89 11 Caucasian Male 89 11 Caucasian male 89 ' 11 Caucasian male 89 11 Caucasian male 89 12 Caucasian Female 8a 12 Caucasian Male 88 12 Caucasian male 88 12 Caucasian Maly 88 APPOOIFI f; i A a r < Vida No. I ~L Agr,,rW,,,i How RANK RAC= OLNDRR $CORN L111~3 C ' =LI~._q~ 12 Caucasian male B8 12 Caucasian male 88 12 Caucasian Male 88 12 Caucasian Male 88 12 Caucasian Male 88 w ` 12 Caucasian r Male 88 12 Caucasian Male 88 ! I r12 Cauculan Male 88 His anic Yale 07 Caucasian lenale 87 13 Caucasian Male 87 13 Caucasian Male 87 13 Caucasian M&Ia 87 13 Caucasian Male 87 13 Caucasian male 87 13 Caucasian male 87 13 Caucasian Male 87 13 Caucasian male 87 13 Caucasian Male 87 13 Caucasian Male 87 13 Caucasian Mal* 87 13 Caucasian Male 87 13 Caucasian male 87 13 Caucasian Male 87 13 Caucasian Male 67 + 13 Caucasian Male 87 13 Caucasian Male 87 13 Caucasian Male 87 13 Caucasian male 87 13 Caucasian Male d7 14 Caucasian male 86 14 Caucasian Male 86 APP00lFI C T, i Apodd No C, Apr,nda Ilorn~ ~j ecoRS LY lu c lH_. RAxx RACII oexnax 14 Caucasian male 86 14 Caucasian Male 86 14 Caucasian male 86 14 Caucasian Male 86 14 Caucasian male 86 14 Caucasian Male 86 1S African American Male 45 ' 17 NstiVs American Kale is 16 Caucasian Male 85 15 Caucasian Male 85 15 Caucasian Male 85 1S Caucasian male 85 15 Caucasian Male 85 15 Caucasian Male 85 15 Caucasian Male 85 SS Caucasian Male 85 1S Caucasian Male 85 16 Caucasian Female 64 16 Caucasian Male 84 16 Caucasian Male 84 16 Caucasian Male 84 16 Caucasian Male 84 16 Caucasian Male 84 16 Caucasian Male 84 16 Caucasian Male 84 16 Caucasian Male 84 16 Caucasian Male - 16 Caucasian Male 84 16 Caucasian Male 84 16 Cau:asian male 84 17. Caucasian Female 83 17 Caucasian Male 83 APP001F1 i' i c 4- t~ 4! Njo rid o No RACS GENDER $CORE ~ fe~x 17 Caucasian male 83 ft_ila 7 17 Caucarian Male 83 ~ oblb 17 Caucasian Male 83 17 Caucasian male 83 1$ Nir anic Male 82 18 Caucasian Male 82 18 Caucasian Male 82 18 Caucasian male 82 18 Caucasian male 82 18 Caucasian Male 82 18 Caucasian male 82 18 Caucasian Male 82 19 African American Male el _ 19 Caucasian male 81 19 Caucasian male 81 19 Caucasian Male 81 j 19 Caucasian Male 81 19 Caucasian male 81 19 Caucasian Male 81 20 Caucasian Tamale 80 20 Caucasian Female 80 20 Caucasian Fesrale 80 20 Hispanic Male so 20 Hispanic •0 20 Caucasian male 80 20 Caucasian male so 20 Caucasian male 80 20 Caucasian Male 8C 21 Caucasian lemrla 79 21 Caucasian male 79 21 Caucasian male 79 21 Caucasian Male 79 APPOOM n ii Nonda N0 _ RANK RACE OMMzR SCORE 21 Caucasian male 79 J C~ 6 1J 21 Caucasian male 79 l 21 Caucasian male 79 21 Caucasian male 79 G 21 Caucasian Hale 79 21 Caucasian male 79 22 Native American Male 78 22 Native American male 79 e 22 Caucasian male 78 22 Caucasian male 78 23 Caucasian Male 17 23 Caucasian Male 77 23 Caucasian Hale 77 23 Caucasian male 77 24 African American Kale 76 24 Caucasian male 76 24 Caucasian Mai.e 76 1 24 Caucasian Male 76 t 25 African American Male 75 r 25 African American Male 73 26 Caucasian Male 74 26 Caucasian male 74 26 Caucasian male 74 27 xis panic male 73 27 Caucasian Female 73 ' 27 Caucasian Male 73 27 Caucasian Male 73 27 Caucasian Male 73 27 Caucasian male 73 28 Caucasian male 72 28 Caucasian Male 72 28 Caucasian Male 72 "P001F1 a I[ r M1 t i RANK RACE UNDER SCORi A{Jflndd 29 Caucasian Faaals 71 ' Ac~end~ I~cm r 29 Caucasian Mal* 71 (}~ln „L1~ .1 1 1 29 Cavcasian male 71 I r } CJ ' a I APPOO M C t I r j c% li ETHNIC/GENDER DISTRIBUTION OF r SELECTED NETROPLEX FIRE DEPARTMENTS Gender Ethnicity Total % City Male Female C AA H 0 Caucasian 278 16 ; 280 7 b 1 95% Arlington 51 1 61 0 1 0 98% Addison , 3 ; 118 0 2 0 98% Carrollton* 116 1486 53 1070 294 99 65 70% Dallas 100% Denton* 91 8 99 0 O 0 i2; 507 80 67 2 77% Ft. Worth* 644 1 4 2 0 97% Garland* 211 4 ; 209 2 0 1 98% Grand Prairie* 136 4 ; 136 2 ; 237 1 4 2 97% Irving* 244 12 { 178 3 3 2 96% Plano* 173 3 ; 137 0 1 0 99% Richardson$ 136 , C = Caucasian AA = African American H = Hispenlc 0 _ Other I *City under Chapter 143 Civil Service Law SOURCE: Taxes State Association of Fire Fighters Annual Statewide Salary Survey 1992 , I FIREMETRO ti 1 ` 1 CITY' VF:F_- 4T +3COUNCI] ♦f+ L.-N «a .-1. OQUUUL aQO~oo r: F oo~~~~QCCC rs^,Or~~~o+ L 14 4 r ~~-----CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMATL~ y 714F TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager DATF, July 29, 1992 SUBJECT: Consider a request to allow the Fred Douglas and Fred Moore Alumni Association to sell lunches in Feed Moore Park on August 8, 1992. RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Parks and ~ Recreation Advisory Board and staff to grant the Fred Douglas and Fred Moore Alumni Association po7irmission to sell lunches in Fred Moore Park on August 8, 1992, fie the )urpose of raising funds for scholarships. f SUMMARY: City of Denton Code of ordinances, Chapter 22, Section :'.2-26 b, requires groups or persons wishing to sell concessions in city parks to seek permission from city Council with the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. B•ACKGROUHD: Previously, other groups have made similar requests with approval. The NAACP held a voter registration and fundraiser in 1991. MS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED; PROGRA, None. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RESPECT ULLYSUBMITT~E~D,~ Lloyd liar rell City Manager Prepared y: N me Ro ert K. Ticknor Title Superintendent of Parks Appro d: GliC N Bet McKean I Title Exe tive Director for Municipal Services/Economic Development c.1 JI 'r, I A 4 " I A. Y. Aaonda Pao. _ Agenda I'em _ i 1 '-----~Yp.►~^NJ-'.va-'-.~~:e.Y~fwL4 ,..•_...-'~a'L'~.M.I:enasYY.L:ri.A~..~a..vrs:~~.J.Y,laryai«.:.k~'.:a.Y~L.A:'fai✓..+:+r w._.~aiw.. ~_wn~... L~jl~ - 'r_~ _ - All J U L 1 7 ~nr1 S~_3o3~ CITY Or- ^-:NTON PARKS i r~cCREA'flOft~ a x Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting July 20, 1992 h~tnJat+n V Page - 7 I Dalton suggested providing the information to each y school's office so the information regarding the ASAS can 1 be handed out at the school's registratidn. The consensus of the Board was to go with Option 2. D. Receive a report on the status of the director's ' position. (Betty McKean) Betty said positive responses to this position had been received. The search firm will provide five individuals to be interviewed by a selected panel. A tour of the facilities for the prospects has been planned. The search firm will be meeting with Dalton to get the Board's perspective on where the department: is. Betty said the target date for having someone on board is October 1. V. INFORMATION ITEMS Janet said that Ms. B. J. Forte had requested permission to scull lunches at Fred Moore Park with the proceeds going to the Fred Douglas and Fred Moore Alumnae Association for scholarships. The request had been received too late to be placed on the agenda. The consensus of the Park Board was to recommend approval of the request. Janet distributed copies of a letter which Betty had sent to Willie Hudspeth thanking him and congratulating him for his work on this year's successful Juneteenth Celebration. Dalton asked about the status of acquiring new park land in Northeast Denton. He said he was aware of a church that had bought land near the Hodge Elementary School and thought the City might look at acquiring property in that area. Bob said an individual had approached the department about 70 acres in that general area. The individual proposed that he may he willing to donate half the acreage with the City buying the other half. Tom presented a catalog he had received about playground equipment. He suggested that several companies be researched and considered as providers of the equipment at the new park. At the October meeting of the Board, Betty said a representati,ie from the Robert Leathers company would make a presentation regarding that company's equipment. Also, staff from the Dallas Parks and Recreation Department might be able to visit and speak on maintenance of the equipment. Bob said that the Community Development Block Grant had \ granted $15,000 for playground equipment for Evers Park, and the money will be released in September, II~ Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting July 20, 1992 Page - 8 A enrla h o.~j~ Agenda ltam_- .1._~-~~ WI(j J Dalton said a meeting of the committee on the development of Science Land would be held at 7pm after the Board meeting and ti invited everyone to attend. offers have been received for the use of temporary space from two retailers. One would be at no 4 cost and the other at minimal cost. VI. OTHER ITEMS r None. VII. ADJOURN On a motion by Neta, second of Burkley, the meetings wasI adjourned. AJJ0046C 1 c a t r L"IT CITY' .COUNCIL + - - Opaa0000cUno r - 00 o r o E ~Qn'~-+-= X00 r 00 = , O . o n- 0 ~O~oooooccCncCaa`~°~~v Li. Ll C 1 I~ P . CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM NOISE ORDINANCE DURING THE NORTH TEXAS STATE FAIR AND RODEO, AUGUST 21-30, 1992 I DATE: August 41 1992 ° I BACKGROUND: The North Texas State Fair Association has requested that the City Council qrant an exemption to the noise ordinance during the North Texas State Fair and Rodeo, August 21-30. The noise ordinance prohibits the use of loudspeakers, amplifiers, and musical instruments on Sundays. The ordinance also declares loudspeakers, amplifiers, and musical instruments a noise nuisance, particularly after the hour of 10:00 p.m. (please see copy of ordinance attached). However, the ordinance states that the City Council may make exceptions when the public interest is served. SUMMARY: Mr. James Roden of the North Texas State Fair Association has requested that the North Texas State Fair and Rodeo be granted the following exemptions from the noise ordinance: DATE: EXEMPT UNTIL: August 24 - 27 (Monday - Thursday) 11:00 midnight August 21, 22, 28, 29 (Fridays, Saturdays) August 23 (Sunday) 1:00 P.M. - 11:00 P.M. August 30 (Sunday) 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. Mr. Roden indicated that this is the same timetable that the fair has scheduled for several years. The Police Department has received noise complaints from citizens in the neighborhood during other ovents which ended later than 10:00 p.m. which have been held on the fairgrounds in the past. A memo from Lt. Welborn is also attached. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTSjOR GROUPS AFFECTED: North Texas State Fair Association, citizens and visitors attending the fair, neighborhood t r. 1 r Anend~ tJo ~ `r~ lr FISCAL IMPACT; LL In i ~5~ None Please let me know if I can provide additional information. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTEDt Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: ~ r Catherine E. Tuck Administrative Assistant i J I r 'f. 1 q~ 1 r{1! ntl 'lera_ ~~C Chapter 20 (l;li _ t~ ` NUISANCES* Art. 1, In General, 20.1-•20.30 Art. 11. Abandoned Properly, 20.31-20.70 Div. 1. Generally, 20.31-20.40 Div, 2. Motor Vehicles, 20.41-20.70 Art, 111. Grass and Weeds, 20.71-20.73 a ARTICLE 1, IN GENERAL Sec, 20.1. Noise, (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to make or cause any unreasonably loud, dis. turbing, unnecessary noise which causes or may cause material distress, discomfort or injury to persons of ordinary sensibilities in the immediate vicinity thereof. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person to make or cause any noise of such character, intensity and continued duration as to substantially interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of private homes by persons of ordinary sensibilities, (c) The following acts, among others, are declared to be noise nuisances in violation of this Code, but such enumeration shall not be deemed to be exclusive: (1) The playing of any phonograph, television, radio or any musical instrument in such manner or with such volume, particularly between the hours of 10;00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., as to annoy or disturb the quiet, comfort or repose of persons of ordinary sen• sibilities in any dwelling, hotel or other typo or residence; i2) The use of any stationary loudspeaker, amplifier or musicid instrument in such manner or with such volume as to annoy or disturb persons of ordinary sensibiltt.iee in the immediate vicinity thereof, particularly between the hours of 10;00 p.m. and 7;00 a.m,, or the operation of such loudspeaker, amplifier or musical instrument at any time on Sunday; provided, however, that the city council may make exceptions upon application when the public interest will be served thereby; (3) The blowing of any steam whistle attached to any stationary boiler or the blowing of any other loud or far-reaching steam whistle within the city limits, except to give notice of the time to begin or stop work or as a warning of danger; (4) The erection, excavation, demolition, alteration or repair work on any building at any time other than between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:30 p.m., Monday through -Crow references-Protected migratory bird roosts declared nuisance, § 0.87; inspection and abatement warrants, § 19.88 et seq,; Insect and rodent cont,ol in mobila home and rec. reational vehicle parses, § 32.91. Supp. No, 1 1389 r i , , § 20.1 bENTON CODE ?;l ^ d Item. 1_ Cl_._ Saturday; provided, however, that the city council may issue special permits for such work at other hours in case of urgent necessity and in the interest of public safety and 1 } convenience; (5) The creation of any '.oud and excessive noise in connection with the loading or un- loading of any vehicle or the opening or destruction of bales, boxes, crates or con. ` tainers; (6) The use of any drum, loudspeaker or other instrument or device for the purpose of attracting attention by the creation of noises to any performance, show, theatre, motion picture house, sale of merchandise or display which causes crowds or people to a block or congregate upon the sidewalks or streets near or adjacent thereto. (Code 1966, 14.20, 14.21) Cross reference-Animal noise, § 6.26, I See. 20.2, Odors. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to create or cause any unreasonably noxious, unpleasant or strong odor which causes material distress, discomfort or injury to persons of ordinary sensibilities in the immediate vicinity thereof. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person to create or cause any odor, stench or smell of such character, strength or continued duration as to substantially interfere with the comfortable t 1 enjoyment of private home 3 by persons of ordinary sensibilities. + (c) The following act,t or conditions, among others, are declared to be odor nuisances in 1 F violation of this Code, but such enumeration shall not be deemed to be exclusive: ~ (1; Offensive odors from cow lots, hog pens, fowl coops and other similar places where animals am kept or fed which disturb the comfort and repose of persons of ordinary sensibilities; j (2) Offensive odors from privies and other similar places; (3) Offensive odors from the use or possession of chemicals or from industrial processes or activities which disturb the comfort and repose of persons of ordinary sensibilities; (4) Offensive odors from smoke from the burning of trash, rubbish, rubber, chemicals or other things or substances; (5) Offensive odors from stagnant pools allowed to remain on any premises or from rotting garbage, refuse, offal or dead animals on any promises. (Code 1966, H 14.22, 14.23) Sec, 20.3. Garbage, trash and rubbish nuisances-Generally, (a) Storing or keeping garbage, trash and rubbish. The storing or keeping of any and all stacks, heaps or piles of old lumber, refuse, junk, old cars or machinery or parts thereof, garbage, trash, rubbish, scrap material, ruins, demolished or partly demolished structures or buildings, piles of stones, bricks or broken rocks on any premises bordering any public street Supp. No 1 1390 1 r. .1rtu~~ ftyl NOhTH TEXAS STATE FAIR ASSOCIATION ti ff ~ PrlPnda No W1. f~ Il~s ~ rl ]('II:d It^H) July 28, 1992 P•nfdent(fiecullve Dl. eclm: James Floden Catherine 'fuck AcnfRe,t: anccl 215 E. McKinney A<Irnlnisbollonon Bob po,ee„ Denton, TX 76201 Ycu P.esldonMrona Fro nla; Bill Allen Dear Ms. Tuck, Ek, ,etary: Bob Malhcws ucasum: The North Texas State Fair and Rodeo will be held August 21-29 and Lloyd Ballad will feature both professional and local entertainment (bands, °ie1oi Hoberl Bell modern dance ensembles, square dancers, cloggers); arts and crafts alo,.ncadlon booths; civic organization booths; cook-offs; a Texas Old Time Scot Fmd Fiddlers Contest; children's art exhibit; a children's petting zoo; Melvin llalsler youth and open livestock shows; youth and professional rodeos; a Fred ylerp¢r Hobert Haub pageant for girls ages three to eighteen and continuous live enter- vale lnvin tainment. 7roy 1.10,one Malin caaFre MccKhl KnIgM The North Texas State Fair and Rodeo, which has f,)r 64 years produced Jelly MohalnlOy an annual Fair and Rodeo in the City of Denton, makes the following pillli requests: Danny Cche«e lir (Allcon elmalors: ' JoH Moseley, 1. Permission to have outdoor entertainment using electrical Cnom). Judge music equipment, a carnival with music, and rodeos and lfoyd Hanell, livestock shows with the use of a loud speaker at the C,ty A(anege, chuck Carpenter. Fairgrounds, F',e,idonl of Ghambnr of commaae 2. The hours of entertainment will be: l Innumry (bald of 04a1.w. 11 . K. hers UOng Marknannaac,. Friday, August 21 4:00 p.m. - 12:00 p.m. + Saturday, August 22 1:00 p.m. - 12:00 p.m. Sunday, August 23 1.:00 P.M. - 11:00 P.M. Monday thru Thursday, August 24-27 4:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. Friday, August 28 4:00 p.m. - 12:00 p.m. Saturday, August 29 1-.00 p.m. - L2:00 p.m. j Sunday) August 30 8:00 a,m. - 4:00 p.m. ccrely, mes Roden, President/General Manager North Texas State Fair and Rodeo 7ltli f 221714OPTHCAHM01I_ PO WA 6X) DCNION PxAsi6;ili? "1 71 "t. 71'e3: * • ` A. 1 I I p ON~ I - ~ tip •rlrl,3 tie. _ 111111 Denton Police Department 221 N, ELM DENTON, TEXAS 76201 1 Catherine'I'uck July 26, 1992 Administrative Assistant City of Denton 215 H. McKinney St. Denton, Texas 7001 Re: North'rexas State Fair and Rodeo Catherine, Recently the Denton Police Department has been meeting with the atcwly formed North Denton Center Neighborhood Association. 'The members of this association live in the immediate vicinity of the fair grounds. As we have begun to form a Comnmmity Policing program in (his area, Ilse primary concern expressed has been Ilse noise problems associated with events occurring at the fair grounds. I hclicvc that ,he citizens in this group will not approve; of the variance requested by Mr. Roden for the upcoming fair. If this variance is granted, I believe that the City of Denton should make even, etron to notify the citizens that live In this ar,a. otherwise, they will be calling the police expecting to Itave (he noise slopped. It might be advisable to contact the association president, Gene 'Truss, and inform him of the date the council will consider (his request. I feel certain that they will want to appear before the council and express (heir concerns. Sincerely, i /James M. Welborn, Lieutenant, Field Operations f (817) 566.8181 METRO 4344620 f~ t r RCITYr, ,,.,.,,,COUNCI1 --4 r pI - - r .A' L _ oooO~~~pOQOQODOpOp1%pCO to t O O 7:- C' r- ~OO OO ~v tQ~O`~" - \J 1 /n t: Z i CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E, MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM TO. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: Harlan L. Jefferson, Director of Treasury Operations DATE: July 30, 1992 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF EFFECTIVE TAX RATE Attached please find the "Notice of Effective Tax Rate". The law requires municipalities to submit the notice to the City Council and publish it in a local newspaper. The notice contains next year's effective tax rate, rollback tax rate, and the notice-and-hearing limit, As you are aware, the effective tax rate allows the public to evaluate the relationship between taxes for the current fiscal year and upcoming fiscal year. This rate will produce the same amount of tax revenue if applied to the same properties in both years. The rollback rate is the highest tax rate the City can set before taxpayers can start rollback procedures. The notice-and-hearing limit is the highest tax rate the City can set before it is required to schedule hearings to discuss the proposed tax rate and publish notifications of the hearings. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. I I H.7 i lb AFF00333 C E 4 8171555.8200 D/FW METRO 434-2529 < 1997 PROPUTT TAX RIITRS IN CIT! OF DsNTOlf This about three tax rates. List property they Denton. 7t rate the presents information determine property taxes lest year. This year'a effective tax rate would fsed to rollbac tasotalrstttaxeise ethighestt year Lf.xyourate t compahere tpropsrtles taxed In botbah ytere. This q irae the 060 takhtLaxing unit can sat tove tesp rollback procedures. In each cams theme rates are found by dividing ther total at taxes by the tax base (the total value of taxable property) with adjust t~f ! stars law. The rates are given per $100 of property value, i1tJ AlId TJd? _1 Lest year's tax rates li (1A (Pllf i fi La t year's operating taxes Last year's debt taxes S L~4d 2801956 l~j , Last year's total taxes Last year's tax base $ 10,499,168 Last year's total tax rate $ 1,970,393,883 S .b851/$100 TA1a year's alfsotlre tax vets! Last year's adjusted taxes (after subtracting taxes on lost property) + This year's adjusted tax base $ 13,446,811 (after subtracting value of new ro This year's effective tax rate p Wrty) $ 2,872,714,976 1 x .03 s Maximum rate unleee unit publishes 5 .7180/$100 notices and holds hearings $ .7395/5100 This year's rollback tax rate! Last year's adjusted operating taxes (after subtracting taxes on lost property) + This year's adjusted tax base S 9,205,305 This ys ar's effective operating rate $ 1,872,714,976 x 1.08 (or add Sa08 for schools) ^ This year's $ •4915/$100 { max um operating rate + This year, debt rate $ .530815100 This year': rollback rate $ .2239/$100 S .7547/$100 sCRiDUL■ 112 Unencumbered Fund aalances low ofethe curirentafiscal year proThese b lleft in not iinit's are the mproperty tax accounts at the end obligation, encumbered by a corresponding debt Tvw of Prowrty T~ s_..~ General Fund General Debt Service fund $ 3,132,.580 S 709,526 MUM Di 1992 Debt service The unit Plana to pay the following amounts for long-term debts that are secured by property taxes. Theme amounts will be paid from property tax revenue (or additional sales tax revenues, if applicable). ~ Principal & ]merest Requirements for 1991-92 DS'l'DYlotlon o! Dab Principal Interest Other Amounts Total a To St Pal" To sa ft" IQ-6X-EA" E&MIlt 1985 Oeneral Obligation Refunding $1,765,000 $ 878 653 I 1987 General Obligation 175,000 ' $909.10 $2, E44,562.10 1987' Certificates of Obligation 15,000 209.650 909.09 385,259.09 1987A certificates of Obligation 120 000 25,350 909.09 51,259.09 1988 General obligation 175' 39,190 909.09 160,099.09 1989 General obligation ,000 218,013 909.09 218,982.09 1989 Certificates of Obll ation 175,00 250,175 909.09 426,084.09 1989A certificates of Obligation 1293850 1'383 909.09 26,557.09 1991 Certificates of obligation 47460 61,419 909.09 192,178.09 1992 CsrtLtkcstes oL Obligation 85 150 9'391 909.09 57,760.09 1992 central Obligation 91232.908 909109 342,829.09 ~-Q 909,09 233, lL 817 B9 alm -5 52,0 'A 001 510.000.00 54.739.657.00 Total required far 1992 debt service Amount (if any) paid :rom funds listed in Schedule A $4,709,657 Iscess collections fast year 500,545 Total to be paid from taxes in 1992 + Amount added in anticipation that the unit will 54,236,117 Coll Oct 1004 of 1140 taxes in 1991 Total Debt Service Levy ~ 14,236,112 EMEND This notice notains a summary of actual @!(active and rollback tax rate calculations, you can inspect a copy of the full calculations at the office of the city Secretary, 215 S. C xainnsy, Denton, Texas. Na" of person preparing this notices Harlan L. Jefferson Titles Director of Treasury Operatlono -a~ Date prepared! July 28, 1992 r. 4 Il { -W+ «.~r..~...a.... fem. 11 - ,CITY CVUNCI: Y - • 0 0 q(\a4aacoo = O F 0 °pdCV~ j p ~ Imo' ~ pppop~cc~,v • ~ ~ rG~w`~` ucauc~o~ µ I-.= t ~y Ci 4 k tl G~ CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. WKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 r MEMORANDUM DATE: July 28, 1992 v TO: John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance FROM; Harlan L. Jefferson, Director of Treasury Operations SUBJECT: Collection Rates for 1991-92 and 1992-93 This is to certify that the anticipated collection rate uF.ed for tax rate calculations is 100% for the 1992-93 budget year. The actual collection rate for budget year 1990-91 exceeded ninety-seven (97%) percent. Through June 30th, the actual collection rate for the 1991-92 budget year was ninety-oix point seven (96.7%) percent, These rates only include currant taxes. The anticipated collection rate for the 1992-93 budget year also includes delinquent taxes, rollback taxes, penalties, interest, and the additional penalty under section 33.07 of the Property Tax Code. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact no. A HJtlb AFF0032E 8171566-8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 w - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - n - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - :CITY COUNCIL r - - - - - A - - Y t - - - - TER- - ~ooooaaaoaooooo00-- 00 k~oo 0 C7 7 - OVO *r'~} U ' b _ . oooo~acac ~c4U°° . 1t~.. -t-r} ~ I. l e q~ CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING ! DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 5668309 Office of the City Secretary MEMORANDUM t DATE: July 291 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jennifer Walters, City Secretary SUBJECT: Animal Shelter Advisory Committee A The Animal Shelter Advisory Committee was established by ordinance 89-115 on September 5, 1989 fulfilling the requirements of the Animal Shelter Act. Members of the Committee appointed in 1989 were Nonie Kull (person whose duties included the daily operation of an animal shelter), Jesus Nava (city official), Betty Johnson (representative of an animal welfare organization), Steve Meyerdirk (licensed veterinarian), and Mike Widmer (individual not involved by occupation or membership in any of the other categories). Section I (b) of the ordinance indicated that two terms of office would expire on June 30, 1990 and three would expire on June 30, 1991. In March of 1991, Council reappointed the current members to the Committee. The term of office for Mike Widmer and Jesus Nava has expired and staff is requesting council to consider appointments to those two positions. As Mr. Widmer has only attended one meeting in the two years he has been an the Committee, staff requests that the Council consider a replacement for him. If you have any questions or require any further information, please let me know, Jenn a Waal ers City cretar A00000A2 t 1 Aytpnd,l tdo, ' ~1!;Chi! 1fgHt ~ J rt No. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING SECTION 4-5 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES; ESTABLISHING THE ANIMAL SHELTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE) PRESCRIBING THE DUTIES THEREFORt PRESCRIBING QUALIFICATIONS AND TERMS OF OFFICEt RENUMBERING THE REMAINING SECTIONS OF ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 4 OF THE CODE) AND PROVIDING AN c EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the 71st Legislature of the State Of Texas enacted H.B.2379 which became effective September 1, 1999, and amends s~ Article 4477-6b, V.T.C.S. to require the governing body to appoint an advisory committee to assist in complying with the requirements of the Animal Shelter Act; NOW, THEREFORE, t BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: SECTION I. That Section 4-5 and 4-6 of Code of Ordinances are hereby amended to read as follows: -01 Section 4-5. Animal Sbelter Advisory committee - Creation. (a) There is hereby established and created the Animal Shelter Advisory committee to be composed of five (5) members, who shall most the following qualifications: (1) one licensed veterinarians (2) one city official; (3) one person whose duties include the daily operation of an animal shelters (4) one representative of an animal ' welfare organizationt and (5) one person who is not involved by occupation or membership in any of the above categories. (b) Each member shall serve a term of office of two years from the date of his appointment provided that when the original committee is appointed, two (2) members shall be appointed to serve a term expiring on June 30, 1990, and three (3) members shall be appointed to serve a term to expire on June 30, 1991, t0 be determined by drawing of lots at the initial meeting. c a ) '.t A 22 Section 4-6. Purpose. (a) It shall be the purpose of the Committee to I assist the City in complying with the requirements of the Animal Shelter Act, Article . J 4477-6b, V.T.C.S., as amended and to make 1 recommendations to the City council regarding methods and procedures necessary to ensure compliance with the Act. (b) The Committee shall meet at least three times each year. SECTIQ Ir That the existing Sections 4-5 through 4-34 be renumbered respectively, Sections 4-7 through 4-36. SECTION iir_ That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and arrroval, PASSED AND APPROVED this the 1-54 day of 1989. RAY ST NS, YOR ATTEST: a4A U JENNI F WALTERS, CIT SEC ETAR , APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: -L&ja~ LL901-%~ ` 9/6/89 I PAGE 2 s r. i . 8 City of Denton City Council Minutes A~,rsrtiahJo~J, March 5, 1991 Page 44 R!1e_ c B. The latest sales tax numbers had been~livied. For the first four months of the fiscal year, the City was down r about $48,000 over budget projections, The last month came up more than $20,000 over. r C. Staff was recommending that the Council encourage the passage of H.B. 943 whim allowed cities a 1/20 sales tax increase by a vote of the people the proceeds to be used to reduce property taxes. Under current state law, Denton was prohibited from putting that to a vote of the people because a part of Denton County was in tr.9 DART Regional Transportation System. This bill would take out the provision that prohibited cities in similar circumstances from voting on this type of tax. 16. There was no official action taken on Executive Session items during the Work Session. 4 17, New Business There were no items of New Business suggested by council Members for future agendas, Mayor Castleberry stated that he had been working on a project which involved coordinating the efforts of the various drug groups such as D.A,It.E, and the high school groups, if Council had no objection, he would move ahead in locating a coordinator to combine efforts of the different groups. Consensus of the Council was to proceed with the project, le. The Council convened into Executive Session into the 1 Executive Session to discuss legal matters (considered action in County vs. City and received legal advise regarding qualifications of Candidates and Council Members), real estate, and personnel/board appointments (considered appointments to the Building Code Board, Cow-unity Development Block orant Committee, the Electrical Code Board, the Historic Landmark Commission, the Human Services Committee, the Animal Shelter Advisory Committee, the Blue Ribbon Committee for storm Water Utility and the Sign Board of Appeals.) The Council reconvened into open session and took the following action: A. Boyd motioned, Alexander seconded to reappoint the following members to the Animal Shelter Advisory Board: Nonie Kull, Jesus Nava, lietty Johnson, Steven Meyerdick and Mike Widmer. Motion carried unanimously. \ 0 , CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES HANDOUTS TO COUNCIL. - 8/4/92 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT SUMMARY BY CATEGORY 1990.91 1991.92 1991.92 1992.93 RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE* PROPOSED Pool Manager Cert. $ 1,325 300 $ 11000 $ 1,500 Restaurant Inspections 23,043 21,600 22,500 22,000 9,159 7,600 7,600 7,600 Grocery Store Inspections Swimming Pool Inspections 14,980 14,400 14,400 14,400 Food Handler Permits 51,405 46,000 42,795 43,500 2,802 Day Care Inspections 3,418 2,802 3,000 Beer and Wine Permits 7,363 7,160 7,160 7,160 t 1 700 1,700 Animal Carcass Pick-Up 2,330 1,700 Animal Pound Fees 67,695 56,725 68,000 68,000 ° General Resources 162,794 236,883 227,183 216,882 TOTAL RESOURCES $363,612 $393,070 $395,338 $383,644 1990.91 1991.92 1991.32 1992.9:+ EXPENDITURES ACTUAL _ BUDGET ESTIMATE* PROPOSED Personal Services $296,871 $310,362 $313,823 $307,744 24,231 26,835 26,835 26,635 ` Supplies 11,948 8,098 8,098 7,732 Maintenance Services 31,484 40,867 39,674 41,633 0 0 0 Sundry 0 6 508 0 Fixed Assets 0 6,908 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $363,512 $393,070 4395,338 $383,644 1990.91 1991.92 1991.92 1992.93 PERSONNEL IN WORKER YEARS) ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE* PROPOSED 1.0 ServlcelMaintenance 6.0 5.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 Office/Clerical 1.0 1.0 TechnicallParaprotesslonal 3,0 3.0 ,0 5,0 Professional 0.0 010 0.0 2.0 1 0 1,0 Management/Supervision 1,0 1.0 rOTAL REGULAR PERSONNEL 10.0 10.0 10.0 1010 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.0 TemporarylSeasonal TOTAL PERSONNEL 10.b 1016 10.5 10.0 Estimate as of May, 1992 j, 182 "Dedicated to Qua!!fy Service" - i 'la CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS s A ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES s } ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES .J SUMMARY BY DIVISION "?1 1990.91 1991.92 1991.92 1992.93 RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE* PROPOSED Environmental Health $ 110,693 $ 98,762 S 98,466 $ 98,962 Animal Control 70,025 58,425 69,700 67,700 General Resources 182,794 236,883 227,183 216,882 TOTAL RESOURCES $363,612 $393,070 $395,338 $383,544 1990-91 1991-92 1991.92 1992.93 EXPENDITURES ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE• PROPOSED Environmental Health $130,347 $141,936 $141,936 5135,695 Animal Control 233,166 251,135 253,403 247,849 TOTAL EXPENDITURES ~c 363,612 $393,0!0 $396,338 $383,544 . I I I 199r.r 91 1991.92 1991.92 1992.93 PERSONNEL (IN WORKER YEARS) ACTUiaL BUDGET ESTIMATE* PROPOSED Environmental Health 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Animal Control 6.5 6.6 6.6 6.0 TOTAL PERSONNEL 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.0 j ' Estimate as of May, 1992 183 "Dedicated to Quality Service" \ I T. M G t; I FOOD ESTABLISHMENT PERMIT FEES 1 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH JULY 1e 1992 HANDOUTS TO COUNCIL - 8/4/92 NUMBER NUMBER CURRENT CURRENT CURRENT CURRENT CURRENT CURRENT CURRENT OF OF FEE FEB FEB FEB FEB FEB PER EMPLOYFF-t BUSINESSES REVENUE PLUS $10 PLUS $20 PLUS $30 PLUS 540 PLUS $50 0.5 156 $ 55 $ 8,580 $10,140 $11,700 $13,260 $14,820 $16,380 6.10 51 75 3,825 4,335 4,845 5,355 5,865 6,375 11-IS 25 95 2,375 2,625 2,875 3,125 3,375 3,625 16-20 15 115 1,725 1,875 2,025 2,175 2,325 2,475 21.25 11 150 1,650 1,760 1,870 1,980 2,090 2,200 26.30 7 170 1,190 1,260 1,330 1,400 1,470 1,540 31.35 3 190 570 600 630 660 690 720 3640 2 210 420 MO 460 480 500 520 40-PLUS 12 220 2,640 2,760 2,800 31000 3,120 3,240 Told 282 $22,975 $25,795 $28,615 $31,435 $34,235 $37,075 92-93 BUDGET CALCULATIONS$ PROJECTED 92-93 CURRENT REVENUES $ 90F962.00 LESS - PROPOSED EXPENDITURES (1361970,00) TOTAL EXCESS OVER REVENUES--------------------$ (38P008.00) I INCREASE EXISTING FEES BY $50.00 $ 371075.00 REINSPECTION REVENUES GENERATED 31500.00 f ADDITIONAL REVENUE GENERATED BY INCREASE 40,575.00 TOTAL REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES 21567.00 NOTES 1. Each additional $10,00 Pee increment will generate an additional $2,820 in revenue. 2. Reirlspection revenues generated are not based on incremental percentage increases due to expected compliance by food establishment owners. . - s ~ HANDOUTS TO COUNCIL - 8/4/92 11`114Ml M bL1111NFl11NB '1HE SEASONAL AN1hIAL CUNYHOL OF 1L'EK YUti1TI N bnrvacn RE1duot1on-•-we {could be Forced to discontinue hovinn till t UtFicer be on duty From 'In:UU p, m, to 8: 00 p,m., 11onday through hviday, From April 1 through September 31, In f1aral wear ISSU-el this poeltion handled the tollowinll ea11.s. IYI'E Uh RELA)'S'1' FUR SERVICE NO. OF RE:WULSTH Lossible rabies exposures (bitns) .............2P npp rassivs animal .............................13 Unrestrained dog .............................333 ,y Livestock problem .............................PO Wildlife problem ..............................31 [lick up a dead animal.... I ....................GCi Animal noise problem ..........................29 Unrestrained cat .............................15`1 Sick or injured animal ........27 (Auarantins of a possible rabies SUSpsCt........ '7 I 10tal ....................7U2 Without the Seasonal Animal Control OFFicer position onlll let) of these requests For service would have been considered to br, omergoncU situations and responded to by an on-call UFFIr;or. t i Y I'i:, Uh NEWEST FOR SERV 1 CE NO. UI' REWUEk;7 S I'ossiblu rabies exposures (bites) .............2d Oppressive animal . ......................13 Livostock problem,, ti., HO Wild11Fe problem ..........................:j1 Sick or injured animal. ..E!V Wuarantine of a possible rabies sLl9pact........ 7 Total ....................12U C. 4 t l r. ij H~ NPOUTS TO COUNCIL - 8/4/92 _CITY OF OEN70N, I S ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES KEEP DENTON BEAUTIFUL KEEP DENTON BEAUTIFUL10800 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - The Keep Denton Beautiful Board is appointed by the City Council to develop programs and make recommendations on t issues related to the appearance and environment in Denton. The Board implements and organizes a number of activities and events Including city-wide clean-ups, Adopt-A-Spot, Tree City USA, Christmas Treecycle recycling, and school projects. Keep Denton Beautiful is a certified city in the Keep America Beautiful, Inc. national program. In order to maintain that status, the city submits an annual photometric index (litter survey} and cost benefit analysis, The Community Improvement Coordinator acts as the liaison to the Keep Dentan Beautiful Board. 9 MAJOR DIVISION GOALS - 1. To develop a comprehensive marketing program using promotional material, newsletters, media and speakers bureau. 2. To enhance and beautify our community through positive and effective education. 3. To urge the City Council and Municipal Judge to strengthen anti-litter message. 4. To strengthen the enforcement of the antidumping, junked vehicle, trash and debris, and high grass and weeds violations. 5. To develop a promotional plan to further expand the Adopt•A•Spot program. 6. To plan, promote, and conduct clean-up events throughout Denton. 7. To involve children and students in environmental programs, 8. To support involvement of the universities in the program including membership on committees, clean-up events, and Adopt-A•Spot. 9. To meet with neighborhood representatives to discuss the programisl• W. To encourage and promote landscapelbeautification projects. 11. To encourage and promote tree planting and maintenance. 12, To develop, encourage and promote membership in Keep Denton Beautiful. MAJOR DIVISION OBJECTIVES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992.93 t. Complete one city-wide clean-up. 2. Organize Adopt-A-Spot month and clean-up. 1 Complete annual photometric index. 4. Complete annual cost-benefit analysis. 6. Present information on beautification to 30 civic or school groups, 1990.91 1991.92 1991.92 1992.93 , WORKLOAD MEASURES ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE PROPOSED 2 1 1 1 1. City-wide cleanup 1 2 2 2 1 1 2. Neighborhood clean-ups 1 1 3, Photometric index 1 1 36 30 3 3 4. Presentations to groups 26 10 32 40 6. BoardlCommittee meetings 1990.91 1991.92 1991.92 1992.93 PRODUCTIVITY MEASURES ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE PROPOSED 100% 100% 100% 100% 1, City-wide clean-up 100% 100% 100% 100% 2, Photometric index \ 3. Completion of beautification projects 100% 100, 100°k 100% within project time table AAA00A8711 ~ (r "Dedicated to Quality Service" 1 r~ A CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES KEEP DENTON BEAUTIFUL KEEP DENTON BEAUTIFUL/0806 1990.91 1991.92 1991.92 1992.93 RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE' PROPOSED Solid Waste Transfer $0 $0 $0 $10,000 ; Recycling Reserve 0 18,100 18,100 37,925 Memberships 0 505 600 500 Donations 2000 2,000 1,000 11000 Containers 0 1,500 300 0 General Resources (2,0001 {660} {12,2991 (30,7751 ' II TOTAL RESOURCES SO $21,445 $7,6011 $18,650 1990.91 1991.92 1991.92 1992.93 EXPENDITURES SUMMARY ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE' PROPOSED Personal Services $ 0 S 0 $ 0 $ 0 Supplies 0 1,050 2,100 3,666 Maintenance 0 1,500 300 0 Services 0 5,895 2,901 6,470 Sundry 0 13,000 21300 8,515 Fixed Assets 0 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $0 $21,445 $7,601 $18,650 i 1990.91 1991.92 1991.92 1992.93 PERSONNEL IN WORKER YEARS) ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE' PROPOSED Service/Maintenance 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OfflcelClericat 0.0 0.0 0.0 010 TechnicallParaprofessional 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Professional 010 0.0 0.0 0,0 Mana9emenUSupervision 0.0 0.0 010 0.0 TOTAL REGULAR PERSONNEL 0.0 0.0 010 0.0 Temporary/Seasonal 010 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL PERSONNEL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MAJOR BUDGET CHANGES Estimate as of May, 1992 f_ AAAOOAB7l2 1 - "Ded/cated to Qualify Service" i ~ I ~a HANDOUTS TO COUNCIL - 8/4/92 August 3, 1992 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PROJECTS 1992, 19931 1994 _ i PROPOSED PROJECTS COMPLETION/STATUS 5/29/92 ! Morrison Lease Agreement (ongoing) 8/31/92 A Cooke County Lease Agreement (ongoing) Denton Municibal Center (design only) • Law Enforcement Court Complex Phase I 11/1/92 Design • City Hall West (Old Police Station) 4/1/93 Design • City Hall (O'Neil Ford Civic Complex) 6/1/93 Design • Customer Services, Personnel, Data 8/1/93 Processing Design Discontinue City Annex Lease Late 1994 • Move Personnel and Data Processing Certificate of Obliaation Buildina Proiects ($700,000 in projects) • New Denia Gym Floor (15,013 9/30/92 9/30-93 • New Electrical Panels - City Hall (10,868) In Process • New Security Lighting - visual Arts (6,547) ].1/1/92 • New Restroom Partitions - City Hall, Library, SCivic Center moke Detection6 • New Security/ System - 8/30/92 , city Hall (27,500) Bid 8/20/92 • New Window Frame Replacement at the Visual Arts Building (36,240) 12/1/92 • Renovate Civic Center Restrooms to Meet A.D.A. and Upgrade System (17,040) In Process • New A/C - Police 911 Room (41200) In Process • New A/C - Civic Center Back Offices and Back Restrooms (61500) 2 • New Tennis Courts - Nette Schultz Park 10Com1pl 9ete • Swimming Pool Safety - Rewire Electrical, New Diving Board, New Ladders (18,500) 'o i I 'J a r I 1 Page - 2 i PROPOSED PROJECTS COMPLETION/.STATUS Certificate of Obligation Building Projects ($700,000 in projects) - continued • New Library Roof (107,000) Complete • New Roof. Police - Flat Section Only 3/1/93 0 ; (4,000) 11 • New Security Systems - Tennis Center, Complete Senior Center, North Lakes Center (6,000) • New Parking Lots ;h Fire Station 04 (22,700) In Design Airport (28,000) In Design + Entry Visual Arts (5,000) in Design Civic Center (105,555) In Design • New Sidewalks - City Hall (25,665) 12/1/92 • New Library Drapery (4,000) Complete I • Gas Conversion - Senior Center 1/30/93 (35,000 • Sound System - Council Chambers 3/30/93 f • Projects to Meet A.A.A. Requirements 12/15/92 1 in the City Hall, Civic Center, and Library (8,410) • Architectural Services (30,950) 1/12/93 • Convert Fire Station to Gas (25,000) To Hid 9/1/92 • Roof Renovation - North Lakes 10/1/92 • New Lighting - City Hall (7,000) 3/30/93 • New Carpet - City Hall (20,000) 5/30/93 f `J I G 1