Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-29-1992 r q AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL September 29, 1992 Special Call Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, September 29, 1992 at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: 5:15 p.m. 11 Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing a program to promote local economic development and to stimulate business 1 in the City, and approving an economic development grant agreement with PACCAR, Inc. A 2. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Consider intervention in Dallas County Park Cities Municipal Utility District v. City of Dallas and city of Grapevine. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Consider appointments to the Downtown Advisory Board, the Electrical Code Board, and the Animal Shelter Advisory Board. 3. Consider an appointment to the Community Justice Council. 4. Receive a report and hold a discussion on the electric rate study acid the proposed electric rates and give staff direction. 5. Receive a report and hold a discussion on the water rate study and proposed water rates and give staff direction. 6. Receive a report and hold a discussion on the wastewater rate study and proposed wastewater rates and give staff direction. 7. Receive a report and hold a discussion on the solid waste rate study and proposed solid waste rates and give staff direction. 8. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding solicitations on the roadway and give staff direction. 9. Receive a report and hold a discussion on the City0s position regarding the Fry Street Fair and give staff direction. \ r 1 I City of Denton City Council Agenda September 29, 1992 Page 2 10. Receive a briefing regarding the new security system at City Hall. C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1992 at o'clock (a.m.) (p.m.) CITY SECRETARY NOTE: THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IS ACCESSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 566-8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX SO THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE. ACCOOOB9 4 CITY _ COUNCIL i - of f)" O A ~p ~p ; 0 a- 0 .o a- 0 0 , `'F g o O~ODQ41 r o M t£ OHO O 0 :1 T, °~oacoocoooo . TZ~ 7 7 T H -1 FT 3 CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING % 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 25, 1992 TO: Mayor and City Council Members FROM. Betty McKean, Executive Director Municipal Services/Economic Development J SUBJECT: PACCAR/Peterbilt Grant Agreement I i Denton has been privileged and proud to have Peterbilt Motors Company, a division of PACCAR, Inc., as our largest manufacturing employer since its location here in 1980. We were all especially pleased and excited when PACCAR announced on August 24, 1992, that Denton had been chosen as the new location for the Peterbilt Division Headquarters. The City of Denton's first contact with PACCAR was through a consulting firm in early May 1992. Very little information was provided on the nature of the firm. We were told that the prospect was a very prestigious company (a Fortune 400 company) looking for an existing building for office purposes. They indicated an interest in the Moore Business Forms building. We were also informed that Denton was among several cities being considered. With that in mind, we examined all of our economic development incentive programs to determine how we could best position Denton to be selected as the new site. Our formal tax abatement policy was not applicable, due to the fact that the project involved an existing building rath(:r than new construction, The Moore Business Forms building is riot located in an Enterprise Zone, and we were informed that the Freeport Exemption was not applicable. in order for Denton to be competitive, alternative incentives, outside of our established policies and programs, were explored. The following represents the incentive program as presented to PACCAR: r 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 I Page 2 7 the Electric Utility Economic/Industrial 1. Application °f IDR) at the Moore Business Forms facility Development Rider will provide an estimated savings of over $54,000 over a five year period. The II. An Economic Development Grant Agreement was proposed. he grant agreement is permissible under dSection 380.001 of tthe Loral Goverom idesCthe fol pwings provides agreement PACCAR, Inc., will purchase the Moore Business Forms building Should the aches ed value of land and first five years after at 1700 Woodbrook. building exceed $1,545,650 during urchase, the City Of Denton will make economic dethemodopemeaot f grant payments equal to the amount ftax typaid Denton independent school District (DISD) property PACCAR for building and land valuations exceeding $1,545,650. rant State law does not afford school districts the same Therefore, under capabilities as it does cities and counties. Judge this agreement, the City of Denton will be responsible fo ortion. On September 29, DISD's grant payment P rt an d valuationca Moseley will present to the comis ion eirscrease agreement for the County's portion would not be considered ~ Any physical expansion to the building reement will be five part of the agreement. The term of the ag years. been etermined, we While the amount that PACCAR will earmark for 5 improvemellion wints/ ll renovations to the Moore facility of has approximately not yet ximately $ construct a new research aand have been informed that a / nd debevelspentopment to freacinolviatety at thelexisting manufacturing In order to ht be under Investment might remodel of some of the extent offices f at the exni11st in improvements/ demonstrate what twe e heve chos nCi 's inve $1 this agreement, renovation for our example. INCREASE VALUATION IMPACT OF PACCAR MILLION GRANT AGREEMENT Tax Rate Amount .7180 $ 71180 Increased City property Tax 6250 6,250 Increased DISD Property Tax TOTAL ESTIMATED ANNUAL GRANT $ 13,430 PAYMENTS BASED ON $1 MILLION VALUATION INCREASE Page 3 RETURN ON INVESTMENT The return on the City's investment is extremely promising. In addition to having the distinction and pride in being chosen as the new home of a company that ranks No. 186 on Fortune Magazine's Top 500, the relocation will produce a very positive economic impact thtoughout the community: 1. NEW JOBS IN DENTON Direct: The new facility will provide approximately 225-250 new jobs with an estimated payroll of $6 million annually. (It is unknown at this time how many of Peterbilt's Newark, California, employees will choose to relocate to Denton.) Indirect: In addition to the new jobs at the Peterbilt facility, the relocation will also generate indirect jobs in Denton. It is estimated that a minimum of 1001 new jobs will be created In the new home construction industry and that 842 new jobs will be created in the service and retail areas. DIRECT JOBS CREATED Pete rbilt Division Headquarters T722 INDIRECT JOBS CREATED Construction ('temporary jobs) Retail/Service (permanent) TOTAL NEW JOBS 434 W II, NEW HOME CONSTRUCTION AND EXISTING HOME SALES It is estimated that approximately 140 new and existing homes will reloc be purchased in Denton aina the result home valuation inn Dent no of conservative side, apply g average $98,000 to the sale of 140 new/existing homes, would generate a total quite possible 0that nthelmajority of area's s homreal estate es purchased or is built will range from $125,000 to $150,000 and higher, boosting estimated total home sales to $21 million or more, Source: Denton Chamber of Commerce 2 Economic Development and Research Center, University of Texas, be created disposable community. \I 1 , r Page 4 7 The employee profile for the new facility consists of approximately 50e engineers and 50$ administrators and clerical support. Many of % the relocating employees in California have already contacted the an interest in $250,000 and priced Dahomes.ealtors expressing Chhigheramber p a III. CITY OF DENTON SALES TAX REVENUE Date Based on the following formula', the City of Denton can anticipate $16 ,800 annually in additl.onal sales tat the new generated by the estimated $G million annual p Y Peterbilt facility. CITY OF DENTON SALES TAX REVENUE GENERATED BYE RBILT RELOCATION Estimated Payroll $6,000,000 ll Disposable Income $2,400,000 40% of Payroll Local_ Dis ursem` $1,680,000 70% of Disposable Income Sales Tax Revenue 16,800 1% of Disposable Income_ City of Denton The agreement will appear on the September 29, 1992, City council 's c agenda for your approval. lrwilltjoineusoand willRbe available office in Bellevue, Washington, to respond to your questions. The new Peterbilt Division Headquarters will provide a tremendous boost to our. Denton economy in the way of new jobs, increased in the construction industry, a real shot in the arm for ouactr.ivity and a resulting growth in retail and real estate market, service businesses. Peterbilt is known world-wide for its high standards in quality and the superior performance of its products. It is a clean industry the type of industry we believe is an ideal match for Denton. In addition, the employee profile of the the type of Headquarters is that of a well-educated workforce, individuals who will fit perfectly in Denton and who will become involved in our community. Our office has received numerous Calls excited from citizens and businesses throughout area who are very its employees. about the warm eadquarters to P terbil. and they will join u in showing 'Source-, Economic Development and Research Center, University of North Texas. v 2~9 9_z _ Page 5 Q 7 Please let me know if you have any questions or if I can provide you with additional information. l Betty McKean, Executive Director Municipal Services/Economic Development lr/6683 I i i + - T 1 i r C ~ l § 180.00I PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT I PLANNING AND DE N'ESMAW Electronic Reseanh Title 12 Title 12 See WESTLAW Elw=nk Research Gulde tod• ty's governing body, m lowing the preface. by the commission sha f 880.001, Eeonomk Development program i (a) The governing body of a municipality may establish and provide for the adminlstra• I The commission t(on of one or more programs, including programs for making loans and grants of public of C Commerce. money and providing personnel and services of the municipality, to promote elate or local Amended by Acts 1989, economic development and to stimulate business and commen,lsl activity in the municipall• ¢ 103, eft. Sept 1, 1991. , ty, (b) The governing bod rical y may: Hdet 141tIo and (1) administer a program by the use of municipal personnel; 1989 a (2) contract with the federal government, the state, a politicai subdivision of the main 19989 89 amendment t as D a 8tf state, a nonprofit organization, or any other entity for the administration of a ro enth to the chp and p 8rarot ain volume in subsea area to t to the par (3) accept contributions, gifts, or other resources to develop and administer a pro Commission Acts Texas gram. Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch, 686, ¢ 1, eft. June 14, 1989. chmended V 1G8Ig,hl 4swas epee ' leg„ eh. 1 1, ¢ iB(bl, elf. E 9 880.00!. Eeononrk Development Grunts by Certain Muntelpalltles - (a) A home-rule municipality with a population of more than 100,000 may create Notes of programs for the grant of pub is money to any organization exempt from taxation under , promotion of d, Section 601(x) of the Internal Revenue Code of 19861 as an organization described in 1 In order to create avco Section 501(e)(3) of that code r for the public purposes of development and diversification appropriate county tun of the economy of the state, elimination of unemployment or underem to state, and d6velopment ur e p smart in the l ommerce . The furtherance of those publlo purposes and shall be used the t he state recipientg y rants as determined b the recipient's governing board for pproP y 381.002. Advertlel ance of this section and under conditionss prescriubed by the municipalityto be in further (a) It authorized b, election, the co (b) The funds granted by the municipality shall be derived from any source lawfully g eneral fund anmam available to the municipality under its charter or other law, other than from the proceeds advartise and promos of bonds or other obligitiors of the municipality payable from ad valorem taxes. separate fun' Added by Acts 1991, 72nd Leg„ ch. 18, ¢ 13,06(s), eff, Aug, 26, 1991, Amended by Acts 1991, 72nd tutee o Leg., lot C,8„ ch. 4, 125.02. off. Aug. 22, 1991• only for board t Pur"PO qu t 2e U.SA,A 16001(epa) r In a county qu board shall devote i Hdatortad and Statutory Notes Vernon's Ann.Civ.St, art. 1182m. ! development of the c Prior Laws d The board cons Acts 1989, 71st Lsg„ ch, 215. and who serve terms compenealion. Vacs SUBTITLE B, COUNTY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT same manner as the (d) Annually, the I CHAPTER 381, COUNTY DEVELOPMENC AND GROWTH for the ensuing seat Sectbn (e) Subject to the Cross Community and Economic Develop. Peermanenrtni provements for Institutions of per) Bef, rent, or t ment Programs in Ceruin Counties, higher education, see Vernon's Ann.Civ.St art p Before a claim 1182n, approved by the b. commissioners court 1381.001. County Indwtrial Commlalon which it acts on any (See main volume j)r hart of (a) and (b)] (g) Although co money or levy o of < (c) In a county with a population of 14,320 to 14,340, or 15,500 to 16,600, or 17,710 to appropriate more I 17,800, or 22,900 to 23,000, a person appointed to the commission also must be serving or Amended by Acts 198 must have served on in Industrial foundation committee, commissioners court, munielpaU. 102 , 'L fem..- ,l-y , y D ciryof DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 565.8307 Office of the City Manager M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayer and Members of the City Council FROM: Jennifer Walters, City Secretary DATE: september 25, 1992 SUBJECT: Sack-up for Agenda Item d 1 The ordinance and contract for PACCAR will be delivered to you someone on Monday for your review. Jen fer Wa ters 2727 /2 _ -"-'ate 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a CITY -C4U1vCIL - - - - - - - - - - - - t - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TM: - - { - oo~Op~obOQO p~~oop ~O 1 Hr pp. -per; opp 0 0: o 0 N. i T., ppp0~~~~JG G 0 6 G Q~~~~o~o c - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i ,CC I I . _ 9-d-,70,40. DAVID WHITE 1)ISTAICT Nocr 401 lN, HICKORY 362nd D15 fRICT COURT Dw'rON, TEXAS 762,01 (817) 565-8516 DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS (817) 565-8517 September ll Mayor Sob Castleberry 7.].5 E, McKinney Denton, Texas '16201 Dear mayor Castleberry: As a result of the passagr. c 1113 2335 by the Legislature, massive chany,38 n our criminal justice system rommenced on i september 1, 1969. One of tkle major changes has involved the increased use of community-based corrections for certain of tender.s. '1'110 ],egi.slai:ure has required that each jutilcial district have a Criminal. Justice Plan in order to recoi.ve state aid, which plan shall include: 1) a summary of services; 2) a descript.ion of proposed new facilities or programs or significant expansion of existing facilities or programs; 3) a descr•ipLion of services needed for offenders; 4) a cony or description of Proposed contracts required to achieve proposed fac,il:i.tl.es or programs; 5) a statement of. commitment to achieve a targeted level of aUer.nat.ive satlct.ions; 6) descriptions, of implementation processes; '1) descr•i.ptiores of existing programs; l1e Division. E3) any other information required by t The criminal y jurisdic.ti.oll desiringcltoyreceive11fundsJforrany Council in any r community corre.m.1011s facility. 4 The Community Justice Council. is to consist; of a city r.ouncil member of the most, Populous city in the area to be served, anti this position is vacant since Jim Alexander i.s no longer a councilman. Enclosed you will find a ballot on which you are to cast your vote. Please return the ballot to me at Carroll. Courts 1301ding, 401 W. Hickory, Denton, Texas '16201. by October 1, 1992. Your time in complying with this request is greatly i appreciated. Yours Truly, I JavidpWhi.te Local. Administrative Judge i I e er II11. 1 , BALLOT FOR THE COMMUNITY JUSTICE COUNCIL VOIT FOR ONP ( ) MAYOR, BOB CASTLEBERRY i { } JANE HOPKINS Iw ( ) MARGARrT SMITH ( ) MARK CHEW ( ) DR. HAROLD PPRRY ( ) JACK MILLER ( ) DR. EIJLINE BROCK f CITY COUNCIL ~oonooao~aoQ oooo°o o ~ A f) o ° o d i OD~OF °O0d0aoa coo T } h. September--29,--1992 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager RE: RECEIVE A REPORT AND HOLD A DISCUSSION ON THE ELECTRIC RATE STUDY AND THE PROPOSED ELECTRIC RATES AND GIVE STAFF DIRECTION RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utility Board, at their meeting of September 9, 1992, recommended to council approval of the proposed fiscal year 1993 Electric rate ordinance, pending legal approval. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: The Board was briefed on the Electric cost of service study and proposed rate changes at the August 27th meeting. A representative from C.H. Guernsey explained the cost of service methodology and how the results suggested changes to the rate structure. One of the primary goals of rate design, in addition to allocating appropriate rates to each customer class, was to become more competitive with other electric utility companies. This resulted in a rate design that provided a significant rate decrease for large commercial customers. This was accomplished by combining the General Service (GS), General Primary (GP) and the Large Primary (LP) commercial/ industrial rates into two new commercial rates, General Service Large and General Service Small. The cost of service study recommended a $1.00 increase be added to the facility charge of the small residential customer. During the discussion of Electric rates, the Board elected to delete the proposed increase in the small residential customer facility charge. in addition, the Board directed the staff to develop an experimental weekend rate. The proposed experimental weekend rate was presented to the Board at the September 9th meeting. After much discussion the Board revised the proposed rate and approved a new Experimental Weekend Rate. Overall, Electric rates are proposed to decrease by 5.1% in 1993. Exhibit I provides a summary of electric rate changes. Exhibit II contains the Electric rate study and proposed rate ordinance for fiscal year 1993. Exhibit III contains the minutes of the September 9th Public Utility Board meeting. J v Page 2 r FISCAL SUMMARY; 4 The proposed 5.1% decrease in Electric rates wonid cover anticipated expenses and provide a net gain on the cash basis of approximately $68,000. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Citizens of Denton, Electric Customers, Denton Municipal Utilities, Legal Department, Finance Department, Public Utilities Board, and City Council, i Respectfully submitted, 1 qjlloVd4V. Harrell, City Manager Prepared by: - ard Martin, i ector of How Environmental Ope ations/ Financial Administration Approved by: R.E. Nelson, Executive Director Department of Utilities Exhibitsi I. Summary of Electric Rate Changes II. Electric Rate Study and Ordinance III. Minutes of PUB Meeting of 9/9/92 \7 CI Ty OF DENTON ELECTS ED URATL V- 3 J_. CURRENT VERSUS PROPO Current Proposed Rates _ Rates - Rate Schedule f 6.50 6.50 4,23 Residenik?I R1 4,20 Facility Charge $ per KWH Energy Charge/cents pe 7.50 7.50 15,00 Resident, R? _ Single phase 15.00 Facility Charge $ 4.95 Facility Charge $ -Triple Phase 4.20 Energy Charge/cents per "Hi 3.80 4.45 0 - 1,000 KWH (Winter) 5,45 Inter 5,45 6,00 All additional KWHSummer) 6.00 0 - 3,000 KWH All additional KWH (Summer) 60.00 GSI. 60.00 9,00 General Service Large _ g 00 1.36 Facility Charge 1,40 Demand Chsrgel$ per 1.36 Energy Chargelcents Per NH KWH 1,30 1,36 Rlders'. Energy Charge) 1.10 For Primary Service For Primary Service 8, ownership 16.00 _ GSS 16.00 20,00 General Service gingle Phase 2000 7.00 Fes; ity Charge $ `Triple Phase 7.00 Facility Charge $ - 6,56 Demand Charge/$ per KW 6.66 3,60 (First 20 KW not BIIWd) 2.600) 3.60 Energy Chargelcents KWH (0 - Energy Charge All additional KWH 25.00 _ 20.00 90,00 Ex rlmental Weekend Rate Phase WK 26,00 4,25 Facility Charge $ 4,25 - Faclllty Charge $ - Trlple Phase KW not Billed) Demand Chargel$ per KW not Demand Charge Current (First 6 Billed) 7,60 Demand Charge Proposed; (First 20 KW - 2.92 Current Energy C1110199/cents KWH (0 - 700) 6,26 Current All Addtlonal KWH 0 - 2,600) 2.80 Proposed Energy Charge/cents KWH { Proposed All Additional KWH 15.00 16.00 20.00 Leai Govemrrter?t Si =-1 ygle Phase 20.00 6.00 Facility Charge $ ` Triple Phase 6.00 2,96 Faclllty Charge $ - 2,88 Demand ago/centse peKWH Energy Char 15.00 15.00 20,00 Resldendai Tlm,_d-°~ ~Sing Pate 20.00 2610 FaclliSy Charge $ phase 24,80 1,70 Facility Charge $ TrlP1e KWH e peak 1,40 Of' Energy Charge/cents per off peak Energy Chargalconts Par KWH I 1 t f I CITY OF DENTON ELECTRIC UTILITY, CURRENT VERSUS PROPOSED RATES z : /W- Rate Schedule Proposed Giant Rates Rates 1 neral Seryce Tme of Use - TGS Current Facility Charge $ - Single Phase 25.00 Current Facility Charge $ - Triple Phase - 30.00 Proposed Facility Charge $ 70.00 Demand Charge/$ per KW On Peak 10.00 12,50 Demand Charge/$ per KW Off Peak 4.00 4.00 Energy Charge/cents per KWH 0,50 1.00 Riders; Energy Charge/cents per KWH For Primary Service 0,40 0.20 For Primary Service & Ownership 0,20 0.20 r Street Lighting _ LS Sodium; 10O W Facility Charges 4,75 4,75 250 W 6.75 6.75 400 W 8,50 8150 Mercury; 175W Facility Charges 5.50 5,50 250 W 6,50 6,50 400 W 8,25 8,25 1,000 W 15,00 16,00 Energy Cost = Monthly Bulb Wattage Factor x Current Energy Cost Adjustment Monthly Bulb Wattage Factors; 100W 48,00 48.00 2,50 W 105.00 105100 1 400 W 159.00 159.00 Mercury; 175 W 70.00 70.00 250 W 98,00 98.00 400 W 153.00 153.00 1,000 W 380,00 380.00 Other_Llght g__= LO Energy Charge/cents per KWH 250W Sodfum 5.14 5,14 400 W Sodium 5.14 6,14 400 W Mercury 6,14 5,14 1,000W Mercury 5.14 5,14 Monthly Bulb Wattage Facljrs; 250 W Sodium 105.00 105.00 400 W Sodium 159,00 159,00 400 W Mercury 153,00 153,00 1,000W Mercury 380,00 380.00 Traflic Lighting - LT Energy Charge/cents per KWH 5,14 5,14 Docoratlye Lightl_ ng_- DL Facility Charge $ 3.70 3,70 KWH per Customer 415.00 415,00 Energy Charge = Monthly Bulb Wattage Factor x KWH per Customer, i CITY OF DENTON ELECTRIC UTILITY" CURRENT VERSUS PROPOSED RATES , - Proposed Current Rate Schedule Rates Rates Dawn to Dusk- DO Sodium: 7 50 7.50 10O W Facility Charges 9.75 9.75 7.50 W 12.00 12.00 400 W Mercury: 6,25 6.25 175 W Facility Charges 7.25 7,25 250 W 8.00 8.00 400 W Energy Cost = Monthly Bulb Wattage Factor x Current Energy Cost Adjustment Monthly Bulb Wattage Factors: 48.00 48,00 100 W 105,00 105.00 250 W 159.00 159.00 400 W Mercury: 70,00 70.00 175 W 98.00 98.00 250 W 153.00 153.00 400 W 1,000 W Temporary 9ervlce _-T1 15 00 15.00 Facility Charge $ - Single Phase Facility Charge $ - Triple Phase 20a,00 68 16 0100 ,30 Energy Charge/cents per KWH 60.00 40.40 Labor/Equipment $ per Hour - Regular Time 76 00 60,20 Labor/Equlpment $ per Hour - Overtime Interruptible Prlmary_ Serva~Pi 70.00 80.00 Facility Charge $ 4,00 7.00 Demand Charge/$ per KW 0.20 1,38 l Energy Charge/cents per KWH Athletic Field - AF 2000 20.00 Facllkty Charge $ - Single Phase 30.00 30,00 Facility Charge $ - Triple Phase Demand Charge/$ per KW: 1.00 1.D0 October through May 1.00 June through September Off Peak 14 0 00 0 4.50 June through September On Peak Energy Charge/cents per KWH: 3,75 3.75 October through May 3 76 3.75 June through September Off Peak 7 50 7.50 June through September On Peak Uninterru !ibis Power Supper- UPS 65 7,56 Facility Charge $ 250 W Power Standby Unit 7 7.95 30.96 Facility Charge $ 1,200W Power Standby Unit 25.00 26.00 Installation Charge $ CITY OF DENTON ELECTRIC UTILITY _.y-.--..-------- CURRENT VERSUS PROPOSED RATES_..z9-~z. Rate Schedule Proposed C rent Rates Rates ES Standby_Supplementary, & Maintenance Service Facility Charge $ - Primary Service 60.00 60.00 Facllity Charge $ - Secondary Service 25.00 25.00 Demand Charge Primary/$ per KW On Peak 11.00 10.10 Demand Charge Primary/$ per KW Off Peak 4.00 3.50 Demand Charge Secondary/$ per KW On Peak 11.00 10,20 Demand Charge Secondary/$ per KW Off Peak 4.00 3.70 Energy Charge Primary/cents per KWH Emergency 5.20 5.20 Energy Charca Primary/cents per KWH Non-Emergency 0.20 0.20 Energy Charge Secondary/cents per KWH Emergency 6.30 6.30 Energy Charge Secondary/cents per KWH Non-Emergency 0.60 0.30 Industrial Ecanomt Development Rldor[DR Reduction to System Demand: Year 1 50.00% 50,00% Year 2 40.006/6 40.00% Year 3 30.00% 30.00% Year 4 20.00% 20.00% Year 5 10.00% 10.00% Thermal Stora qe Incentiv_e - TS KW Demand shifted to Off Peak First 500 KW $ per KW 250.00 250.00 All Additional KW - $ per KW 125.00 125.00 Energy CoM Adjustment -_ECA ECA Winter/cents per KWH 1,70 1.70 ECA Summer/cents per KWH 1.70 1.70 i ` I f it I EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES September 9, 1992 8. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF ELECTRIC RATES. Harder reviewed the electric rates, advising that for the small GS (250KW) customers, there will be no increase. Motion Laney made a motion to recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed electric rate adjustment. Second By Coplen. Discussion The Board requested advertising the Time of Use Rate in the paper since it is in the process of change, Experimental Weekend Rate (EWK): Harder explained that for rateCresultstin ausrrent isrbelow (the GS rrate, but above the former Weekend (WK) rate. Compared to the current GS rate f EWE rate increases the facility charge from $15,00 to' 0 new reduces the demand charge from $7.00 to $5.60 per KW, and does not change the energy rates or block structure, proposed EWE rate as proposed, Coplen objected to the former WE rate. Coplen noted that tingfairness tto cusgomershwithin this rate class, including churches, the EWE rate should be equivalent to the WE rate. The load profile of several churches was reviewed. The Board emphasized the importance of notifying all potential users of this rate, not just churches. The staff was directed to search out the types of customers that may entry under this rate. Copl nu recommensend notices aview for ded staff setnuprfiles and records in order to document the effect of the new rate. After discussion, a consensus was reached to withdraw the first motion. Second Motion: Coplen made -a second motion that the rates as outlined be accepteu with the revision to the EWE rate that lowers the demand charge and the energy charge for each block, Second by Laney. Discussion: Thompson indicated a concern with a 5% reduction for residents and a 25% reduction for churches. ~y page 2 Nelson stated that the rates will be held to exactly what they were in November 1990, except for the 25% reduction below what current the rates are for the churexperimental" enrate,tbut there shouldebeian recognize this is an ending point to it, so it can be re-examined. This ending pont should be at least on a yearly basis, helping them work with the churches, Laney encourages staff operate their heating and cooling systems, learn how to efficiently p this and only a few churches the electric company's recommendations. Coplen stated staff has have taken advantage f proposed Rate: $20 and $25 facility charge $ 4.25 demand charge first 20 KW no charge i first 2500 @ 5.25/KWH ents/KWH all over r@ 2.8 atchet 80% Vote: t hair called for a vote on the second motion. All ayes, no C The nays, motion carried. Lego- pmm nted legal input from Drake; Drake advised the rata The Board request has a rate class, fairly basic premise that if tithe utility individuals within the rate class. must be set up to apply to al,l this s experimental rate where only There is a potential problem with h thixp y.... a certain number of people are allowed in that rate, Thee canrate be no restrictions on the number of customers for a particular 1 elecrote,o 44 '1~ ORDINANCE, NO. i AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SCHEDULE OF ELECTRIC RATES; ADDING NEW GFNERAL SERVIC" LARGE (GSL), GENFRAL SERVICE SMALL (GSS), EXPERI- MLNTAL WEEKEND (F.WK) APPLIANCE REBATE (APR), AIR CONDITIONING CYCLING REHATE (ACR), AND VOLUNTARY LOAD REDUCTION (VLR) RATE SCHEDULES; DELETING THE GENERAL SERVICE (GS), LARGE PRIMARY (LP), GENERAL SERVICE PRIMARY (GP), GENERAL SERVICE PRIMARY TIME OF USE (TGP), AND LARGE PRIMARY TIME OF USY (TLP) RATE SCHEDULES; PROVI- DING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS; SECTION I. That the Schedule of Rates for electrical services as provided for in Chapter. 26 of the Code of Ordinances, is amended to read as follows. ARTICLE I. ELECTRIC RATE SCHEDULES PAGE R1. Residential Service Rate 2 R2 Residential Service Rate 4 GSL General Service Large 6 GSS General Service Small 9 EWK Experimental Weekend 12 G1 Local Government Lighting & Power Service Rate 14 (City, Couni:y, Independent School District) TR Residential Time of Use Rate 16 TGS General Service Time of Use Rate I-8 LS Street Lighting 21 LO other Lighting 23 LT Traffic Lighting 25 DD Dusk-to-Dawn Lighting (Security Light) 26 T1 Temporary Service Schedule 28 P1 Interruptible Primary Service 30 AF Athletic Field 33 ES Standby, Supplementary & Maintenance Service 35 DL Decorative Lighting 40 IDR Industra_al Development Rate 41 TS Thermal Storage Rate 42 UPS Uninterruptible Power Supply 43 ECA Energy Cost Adjustment 45 APR Appliance Rebate 46 ACR Air Conditioner Cycling Rebate 51 VLR Voluntavy Load Reduction 52 1 ~j I 71 SCHEDULE R1 z.. /D 4/_5^ RF_SIDENTIAL SERVICE (Effective 10/07/92) APP)v,ICATIgH Applicable to all electric service used for residential pur- poses in a single family dwelling or an individually metered apartment; supplied at one point of delivery and measured through one meter where usage is not in excess of 700-_KWI1 per 30-day month during the billing months MAY through OC9'OBER. If usage in any such month exceeds '700 KWH, billing will be rendered that month under. Rate Schedule R-2 and thereafter for a period extending through the 12 billing months of the next year ending with the October billing. Annually, in November, the customer may again quaii£y for the R-1 rate provided that consumption has not exceeded 700 KWH per 30-day month during the previous six summer months. Where individiial dwelling units are being served through the sane meter and the KWH in the billing months of MAY through OCTOBER exceed 700 KWH times the number of dwelling units, the billing for that month and 'thereafter will. be rendered under Rate schedule R-2. NET MONTHLI;Mrr (1) Customer Facility Charge $6.50/30 days (2) Energy Cha a 4. 200/KWJ1 (3) Energy Cost Adjustment Schedule ECA MINIMUM BILLING $6.50/30 days TYPE OF SERVICE' The City will supply single-phase servica at any standard volt- ages available from the City's distribution system through one standard transformation. PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILI`1'IEG All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider, I PAGE 2 i i 1 PRORATION ,OF ~TT1.ITY BILLS tn lling for the Faci.lity charge shall be based on 1?, bilgs ' Fu annually. Formula: Aotual da_ys in ready ng pr.1iod x customer. charge 30 ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT A charge per KWI! of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in ro accordance with schedule ECA. PAGE 3 Sc'HEDULE R2 RESSDEfI_ IA1, SERVICE (Effective 10/07/92) APPLICATION Applicable to any customer. for allOlc,ctric service dwelling or an used indir v and urposes in an isd pp11 d Private point of delivery iduntil p artment, idualally metered ap livable to any customer heat- r.,easured through one meter. ro`A. 5tan pe heat pump. ing with electric energy, 'co tempo- N~t ap~al_icable to resale service any event, nor tary service exec tin conjunction with rary, standby, or supplemen applicable rider. WIN`i'L,R 5UMI~iER NET f40NTHLY RATE months of Billing months of Billing months NOV chrough APRIL MAY through OCT (1) Customer Facility charge $ 7,50/30 days $ 7.50/30 days single Phase 00/30 days $5.5.00/30 days Three Phase $15 . (2) Energy Charge First 1,000 3CWH 4,2OeIKS4H Additional KWH 5, 45C`/KWH First 3,000 KWH 6,00{%1KNFI Additional K4I11 (3) Energy Cos Adjustment schedule ECA schedule ECA MINIMUM BILLING $ 7.50/30 clays $ 7,50/30 days single Phase $15,00/30 day. $15,00/30 days Three Phase TYFE OF SERVICE, The City will supply single-phase service (or three-p00) cycles vise if t,vailak,le at the point of delivery) at 51Y s distribtion and at any standard voltages available from the City point system through one GuSndomertis not already available ervatice the o£ p te type desired by , sbythe contract ar.rangeti+~ents between the city and the of service customer may be required in advance. PACT: 4 ~ r1 9 PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not pa within 15 calenOar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF u,r LITY _BILLS Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual day _in repol.na_periocA x customer facility charge j 30 I ENERGY CHARGE Billing for the energy charge shall be based on actual KWH con- sumption during the billing period, Formula: KWFI in rate block x Rate per M-111 in rate block AFNNERGY COST APIUSTMrNT A charge per KWH of enerq; taken for fuel cost calculated in accords ,ce with Schedule ECA. PAGE 5 `Iyy~ 7 1 SCHEDULE GSL GSNERAISPRVICE LARGE (Effective 1.0/07/92) I APPLICIITIO14 The GSL Rate is applicable to any customer having a minimum actual demand of 250 KW for all electric service supplied at one point of delivery and measured through one meter. Customers 'viith an average actual demand equal to or greater than 180 KW during the previous twelve month period may be allowed service under this rate, subject to the minimum billing r r provision. Customers who elect to discontinue service under this rate are ineligible for service under this rate for twelve months. Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to tempo- rary, standby or supplementary service except in conjunction with applicable rider. NET M0_N_T_ LY RATE (1) Customer Facility Charge $60.00 per 30 days (2) Demand Charge $ 9.00 per KW of demand per 30 days '3) Energy narge 1.40*1KWII for all KWH Energ%., ost Adjustment Schedule ECA M +IMUM SILLINC An amount egainl to the facility charge plus the greater of 1) demand charge a calculated on 250 KW, or 2) seventy percent (70%) of the maximum worrthly demand charge for any month during the pre- ceding months May through October. TYPE OF SF?'VICF secondary or primary service available to commercial and indus- trial customers. Primary service is rendered at one point on the customer-'s premises at a nominal voltage of 13,200 volts. PRIMARY SERVICE DISCOIJNT Customers who own, operate, and maintai'i all facilities neces- sary to receive three phase primary voltage service and all trans- formation facilities required for conversion to utilization voltage shall receive a discount of 0.3G/KWIi. Primary service customers PAGF. 6 i utilizing City owned and operated facility and transformatic1 equipment necessary to receive primary voltage service shall 1 receive a discount of 0.1G/KWfi. The City shall own, operate and maintain all metering facilities, either at primary or secondary voltage. PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. DETERMINATION OF DEMAND The demand shall be determined by the KW supplied during the 15-minute period of maximum use during the current month as deter- mined by City's demand meter, but shall not be less than 70% of the highest monthly demand determined during the billing months of MAY through OCTOBER in the 12 months immediately preceding the current month. POWER FACTOR The City reserves the right to make tests to determine eligi- bility for the GSL rate, and to determine the power factor of the customer's installation served during periods of maximum demand or by measurement of the average power factor for the monthly billing period. If the poorer factor is below ninety percent, the demand for billing pui.poses will be determined by multiplying the uncor- rected KW billing demand by 90% and dividing by the determined power factor. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet _ customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF-UTILITY BILLS (a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill- ings annually. Formula: Actu.i_ days in redlnNLeriod x customer facility charge 30 (b) Billing for demand shall. be calculated on a 30 day per month basis and prorated for lone}er or shorter billing periods. PAGE, 7 'PAN Formula: Actual days in reading period x KW demand x Rate 30 days ENERGY CHARGE Billing for the energy charge shall be based on actual KWH con- sumption during the billing period. Formula: KWH in,_rate_block x Rate per KIM in rate block ENERGY COST.' ADJUSTMENT A charge per KIM of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in accordance with Schedule F.CA, I.J PAGE 8 1 1 . Ap.,,,pa •.„rn SCHEDULE GSS GMERAL SERVICE SMALL (Effective 10/07/92) APPLICATION The GSS rate is applicable to any commercial or industrial customer having a maximum demand less than 250 KW for all, electric service supplied at one point of delivery and measured through one meter. Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to tempo- rary, standby or supplementary service except in conjunction with applicable rider. NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Customer Facility charge Single Phase $1.5.00 per 30 days Three Phase $20.00 per 30 days (2) Demand Charge $ 7.00 per Kw (first 20 KW not billed) (3) Energy charge I First 2500 KWH 6.56/KWH All KWH over. 2500 3.E, 0 VKWH (4) Energy cost Adjustment Current ECA Schedule MTNIMUh1 6ILhING amount equal to the facility charge plus the greater of: 1) the mand charge calculated on the actuc,A KW demand, or 2) seventy per Ott (70%) of the maximum monthly demand charge for any month dur_ig the preceding months of may through October. TYPE OF SERVICE Secondary service available to commercial and industrial customers. The City w!. 11 Supply single-phase service (or three-phase ser- vice if available at the point of delivery) at sixty (60) cycles and at any standard voltages available from the city's distribution system through one standard transformation. Where service of the type desired by the customer. is not already available at the point of service, special contract arrangements between the city and the customer may be required prior to its being furnished. PAGE 9 i i PAYMENT G' Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from elate of issuance. DETERMINATION _OF QEMAAICJ The demand shall be determined by the KW supplied during the 15-minute period of maximu use demand meter, butdtshalgl nthe curren ot be less thanh70% oftthe mined by City highest monthly demand determined during the billing months of MAY through month. OCTno casetsh 111 billedldemand beylesscthang0tKW current In cases where the connected load is constant, the City may, at considere.d demand. fe3/4sWatt. one volt am- its pere shall option, be estimate POWER FACTOR rmin The City reserves the right t make oteserved during periods power factor of the customer. s in. of maximum demand or by measurement of the average power factor for the monthly billing period, if the power factor is below ninety percent, the demand for billing purposes will. be determined by multiplying the uncorrected K;q billing demand by 90% and dividing by the determined power factor, SPECIAL FACLU`.tIFS All services which require special facilities in order to meet. customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider, PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS (a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill- ings annually. Formula; Actual des in T'caclincl_.1?ei iocl r, customer f.aciliity Charge 30 rte bday illing (b) Billing basis and c1 prorated k for calculated longeror on a month periods. Formula: Actual days iii _re~7din9_perod x adjusted KW demand x Rate 30 PAGE 10 , ENFRGY CHARGF. / C' Billing for the energy charge :;hall be based on actual KWH con- sumption during the billing period. Formula: KWH in ratE block X Rate per KWH in rate block ENERGY COST ADJU'3'IX T A charge per KWH of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in accordance with schedule ECA. w I PAGE 17. f J~ ~ v Ps 7 .y]~ a3o SCl1EDULE k:~'1K gXPER1t+SFNTAL_!'I Lr1tE~ip R_ATL /2) (EFFEC"Pivr: aojo 7 ~ whose APPL-ICATION. midnight from F?riday at oad e to any commercial. end Odnau I-r y rie 2 mid ApPlicabl rIt ld2 emand l 10 mid- load occur.) d~ariny and does not ether l k'ridaY a demathround gh Sunday at 12 midnight the 12 midnight load. during the period from Sunday the maximum demand nor to tempo- that exceeds 80° of in any event, wi night th ale service xcept in conjunction Not applicable to re:' Service e rary ,stanabY or supplementary applicable rider. RATE $20.00/30 days--Tingle Phase NET MONTliL~_-- - Charge 00/30 days--Three Phase Facility $2- (1) customer r 4 , 25/1CW (first 20 KW not billed) (2) Demand charge Charge • 5.2.5411C%gli (3) Energy KW11 2.sogyWii First 2,500 ll over 2,500 KWFF All' Per Schedule ECA (4) k:nergY Cost Adjustment. 4IV11UM- BTLS,TNG us hale demand cri o'cf a? /mopt}}Slfor cZthreeP An amount eg1.1a1 to the $20/month for s1ng3-e phase service service, per 30 day billing SERVIOV (or three-phase ser-• TYPk_ QF service cycles s1 ly single phase at sixty (60) will p point of Clelivery) distri bution The City C~ ere 0f the the p - Y if avai standard voltages available fr om the service ce lable a at the poi vi nt and at any h one standard transformation Whavailable and the system throug the customer i.s not alrc<<dY etween the city ntract arrangements » type desired by of service, spec aluiorea. customer may be c q past, due if not paid "PAY MENT are due when rendered and }j,anc1), . lls calendar.. days from date of Within FAGS 1?. t i j2ETFRMINATION OF DEMAND c~ / The demand shall be the 9W supplied during the fifteen (15) minute period of maximum determined by use during the current month as determined by the City's demand meter. The first 20 KW demand shall be billed at $0.00/KW. The adjusted M demand will subse- quently be used for billing the demand portion of the utility bill. In no case, shall billed demand be less, than 0 KW. aPBCIA~ FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PROR&VION UE U'f`ILITY BILLS Billing i,Nr customer facility charge and demand shall be calcu- lated on a 30-day basis and prorated for longer or shorter billing period. (a) Billing for the Customer Facility Charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual dots inrgadi_rlg._p~riocl x cu.ltomer.__ facility chase 30 (b) Billing for the Demand Charge shall be based on 12 bill- ings annually. Formula: ActtW days in reading period x adjusted KW demand x Rate 30 ENERGY CHARGE Billing for the energy charge shall be based on actual KW11 con- sumption during the billing period. Formula; KWH in rate block x Rate per AWli in rate block ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT A charge por KWf1 of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in accordance with schedule ECA. PAGE 13 y SCHEDULE G1 Zs LOCAL GOVERNMENT G(Effective 10/07/92) APPLICATION Applicable to any local City, County Or School District for all electric service supplied at one point of delivery and measured through one meter. Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to tempo- rary, standby or supplementary service except in conjunction with applicable rider. NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Customer Charge Single Phase $15.00 per 30 days Three Phase $20.00 per 30 days (2) Demand Charge $ 6.00 per KW of demand (3) Energy Charge 2.884 per. KWH for all KWH (4) Energy Cost Adjustment Current ECA Schedule MINIMUM BILLING An amount equal to the demand charge as calculated below but not less the.n fifty percent (50%) of the maximum monthly demand charge for any month during the preceding months of May through October plus $15.00/month for single phase service or less than s,•.., $20.00/month for three phase service, per 30 day billing period. TYPE OF SERVICE, The City wall supply single.-phase service (or three-phase ser- vice if available at the point of delivery) at sixty (60) cycles and at any standard voltages available from the City's distribution system through one standard transformation. Where service of the type desired by the customer is not already available at the point of service, special contract arrangements between the City and the customer may be required. PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of .issuance. PAGE 14 4 DETERMINA`PrnN ~F__C3FMAN[) The demand shall be delivered by the Mq supplied during the 15-minute period of maximum use during the current month as deter- mined by city's demand meter. POWER FACTOR The City reserves the right, to make tests to determine the power factor of the customer's installation served during periods o'I maximum demand or by measurement of the average power factor for the monthly billing period. If the power factor is below ninety percent, the demand for billing purposes will be determined by multiplying the uncorrected XW billing demand by 90% and dividing by the determined power factor. SPELT L FAC'ILI`f'IES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject. to the special facilities rider. 1'RORA'I'ION OF UTILI'PY_I3II, LS (a) Filling far the Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill- ings annually. Formula: Actual days in readinc_pgr-_iod x customer farili'.Y charge 30 (b) Filling for demand shall be calculated on a 30 day per month basis and prorated for longer or shorter billing periods. Formula: Actual days__ n_reading__p~ri_oci x KW demand x Rate 30 EN RGY COST AD,7(JS--- A charge per KwH of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in accordance with Schedule ECA. PAGE 15 SCHEDULE TR RF.SIUEIJjrIAL T_il_IS OF_U G (EffC tive 10/0"1/92) 1 AP._ PLI(ATION customer for all electric serviQ~ 3n andi~ Applicable to any delivery and residential purposes in an ind pp7cieci at one point dwelling private vidually meterccl apartment, Customers applying for the TR rate measured through one meter.. must remain on this rate for twelve (12) continuous billing per- iods. event, nor to tempo- Not applicable to resale: Jeservicenexcept in conjunction with nary, standby, or au plementary applicable rider.. NET MONT}iLy., _ILx_ f% Customer Naci.lii:y Charge (1) r 1,.00/30 days Single Phase $15.00/30 $20,00/30 days Thr -e I-~...- (2) Energy Charge 24 , 84 /KWii On-Peak Houra 1 qp /KGJIi Off-peak Hours Schedule P:CA (3) Energ) Cost Adjustment MTNIMUM_STLLING Charge. The. minimum monthly bill shall be the Customer Pacil.ity TYPE _F sg VICE c Iles at second~he single-phase (it three-pitiase at: sixty (60) e desired by special e of the distribution valterge' available vat, the point o of f servi be ce, and the customer may customer, is not already contract arrangements betwefL1Y1lYeheclty required prior to its being DEF'IIJI'J.'I_~N . OI~_2N=FI A_KjIOUKi ,s on-peak hours, for t.hc ~,urpo ;e oC this rate , each i'he City ~ to E:00 P.M, each as he i.ng from 1;00 L.r' ed ~ tile, are desiynai.e.d changed Monday throuy}l PriclaY, staring on , Junet e aaknd h couorsntimnuayibng be through ' September 30 each year. 1'he City from time to time -end the customer will be noti.fi.ed twelve (12 before sucY, change:; become el'fc;cti.ve, months s PAGE; 1.6 f 1 DEFINITION .OP OFFPrAX HOURS j The City's off-peak hours, for the purpose of this rate sched- ule, shall be 611 hours not designated as on-peak hours. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS Billing for the Facility Charge shall be based on 12 billings annually using the following formula: Actual d: in reading period x customer Facility Charge 30 ENERGY CHARGE Billing for the energy charge shall be based on actual KWH con- + sumption during the billing period. Formula: KWH in rate block x Rate per KIVH in rate block ENERGY COST ANJJUSTMENT f A charge per KWH of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in accordance with Schedule ECA. PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. PAGE 17 SCHEDULE TGS GENERAL SI RVICE_IMIU Ol?_USE G (Effective 10%07%92) APPLICATION Applicable to any customer having a minimum demand of 750 K49 for all electric service supplied at one point of delivery and measured through one meter, with the City providing all. facilities necessary to receive primary voltage service. Supplementary ser- vice will be available subject to the applicable rider. Not appli- cable to resale or temporary service. Customers electing this rate must remain on this rate for a minimum of twelve (12) continuous billing months. NET MONTHLY R_AU, (1) Customer Facility Charge $70.00/30 days III (2) On-Peak Demand Charge $10.00/Kil of On-Peak Demand (3) System Demand Charge $ 4.00/KW of System Demand (4) Energy Charge 0.5G/KIJfI (5) Energy Cost Adjustment; Pet, Schedule ECA MINIMUM..aILLING The minimum monthly bil'i shall be the sum of the Customer Facility Charge, the On-Peak Demand Charge, and the System Demand charge; but not less than 100% of the maximum monthly total demand charge for any month during the preceding months of May through October. TYPE OF SERVICE secondary or primary service available to commercial and indus- trial customers. Primary voltage service is available to any cus- tomer with a minimum demand of 250 KW. Primary service is rendered at one point on the customer's premises at a nominal voltage of 13,200 volts. The City will supply single-phase service (or three-phase ser- vice if available at the point of delivery) at sixty (60) cycles and at any standard voltages available from the City's distribution system through one standard tranf>formati.on. available at service of the type desired by the customer is not already the poi of service, special contract arrangements between the City and the customer may be required. PAGE 18 I I~ i i1 DETERMINATTO I OF ON-PE11K pEMAND The on-peak demand shall be determined by the KW demand sup- plied during the fifteen (15) minute period of maximum use each month during on-peak hours as recorded by the City's demand meter and adjusted for power factor, but not less than one hundred per- cent (100%) of the maximum on-peak demand similarly determined dur- ing the billing months of June through September in the twelve (12) months immediately preceding the current month. The on-peak demand will be billed every month. DETERMINATION OF SYSTEM DEF-LAND The system demand shall be determined by the maximum KW demand supplied during the fifteen (15) minute period of maximum use each month as recorded by the City's demand meter and adjusted for power factor, but not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the maximum system demand similarly determined during the billing months of June through September in the twelve (12) months immediately preceding the current month. POWFR FACTUE2 PENALTY The City reserves the right to determine the power factor of the customer's installation served during periods of maximum demand or by measurement of the average power factor for the monthly bill- ing period. If the power factor is below ninety percent (90%) on- peak and average demand for the demand for billing purposes will be determined by multiplying the unadjusted billing demand by ninety percent (90%) and dividing by the determined power factor. DEFINITION Of'ON-PHAK HOURS The City's on-peak hours, for the purpose of this rate sched- ule, are designated as being from 1:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M. each Monday through Friday. The City's on-peak hours may be changed from time to time and the customer will be notified twelve (12) months before to such changes become effective. UFFINITION_.OF OFF_EE.AK HOURS The City's off--peak hours, for the purpose of this rate sched- ule, shall be all hours not designated as on-peak hours. SUP1?LEMFN'1'i1L_ POWER RIDER Customers requesting standby or supplementary power shall be allowed service under this rate, schedule; however, the determina- tion of system demand shall be adjusted to read: The system demand shall be the stun of the maximum KW demand supplied during the fifteen (15) minute period of maxi- mum use as recorded by the City':; demand meter plus the KW nameplate rating(s) of the customer's generator(s). In the PAGE? 19 I-Af i 1 X7Z 6-- event the customer's generator(:.) is/are off-line at the t of the establishment of the maximum system demand, the KW nameplate rating of the generator(s) unavailable for service shall be removed from the determination of the system demand. ; In no event shall the system demand be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the maximum system demand similarly deter- mined during the previous billing months of June through September in the twelve (12) months ending with the current month. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special. facilities in order to meet the customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to special facilities rider. PRORATION OF U'2'.ILITY BTLILS (a) Billing for the Facility -harge shall be based on 12 bill- ings annually using the following formula: Actual days in r adinc__hcr_iod_x Customer Facility Charge 30 (b) Billing for demand shell be. calculated on a 30-day-per- month basis and pro rated for longer or shorter billing periods using the following formula: Actual_days in, readirlg___period x KW Demand x Rate 30 ENERGY COST A~JUSTMEN A charge per KWH of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in W accordance with Schedule ECA. PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. PRIMARY SERVICI_ DISCOUNT Customers who own, operate and maintain all facilities neces- sary to receive three phase primary voltage service and all trans- formation facilities required for conversion to utilization voltage shall receive a discount of 0.3VKWJJ, If primary service is provided and the City owns and operal-es all f.cilities and transformation equipment necessary to receive primary voltage service, a discount of 0.14/KW will be applied to the customer's bill.. The City shall own, operate and maintain all metering facilities, richer cvt. primary or secondary voltage, at the City's option. PAGE 20 tl SCHEDULE LS ST-Rh E'T_T-JGHTING l / J APPLxCATION Applicable to all street lighting owned and maintained by the City of Denton. NET MONTHLI_RAPE (1) facility Char e see table (2) Eneray Cast Adjustment current ECA X Monthly Bulb Wattage Factor I?~u i t i,t y_Charye t l.b 4 attac0e Factor Lss LSA 100W Sodium Vapor $ 4.75 48 KWI3 LSB 250W Sodium Vapor $ b,-/5 105 KWH LSC 400W Sodium Vapor $ 8.50 159 KWH LM LMA 175W Mercury Vapor $ 5.50 70 KWH LMB 250W Mercury Vapor $ 6.50 98 KS4H LMC 40OW Mercury Vapor $ 8.25 153 KWH LMD 10004V Mercury Vapor $15.00 380 KWH TYPE OF SERVICE The City will supply single-phase service (or three-phase sec- vice if available at the point of delivery) at sixty (60) cycles and at any standard voltages available from the city's distribution system through one standard transformation. Where service of the type desired by the customer, is not already available at the point of service, special contract, arrangements between the City and the customer may be required prior to .its being furnished. PAYMENT Bills are due .'hen rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. PROPATION OTC' U'I'IhITY__~iiLiS a) Billing for the Facility Charge shall be based on 3.2 bill- ings annually based on the following formula: Actual ._day_ in__rgading. L?oridd x. customer facility charge 30 PAGE 2 1. M~ y i 1 1 a ENERGY 900_.ADIQ MENT A charge per KITH of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in accordance with Schedule ECA. I~ 1 ~.:Lif 1SY' PAGE 22 ~J d ,L ry` I(; 171 ~ A SCHEDULE Lq . OTlic L1GFI1'ING `3/ to s LUA APPLICAT1c2 maintain he and Applicable State and Local Government agencies that instal their own Denton, liclhts l ofher, titan the city of NET MO ,L' Y RAZ'h BULB WATTAGE LS1 250W Sodium Vapor FACTOR L52 40 LM1 OW Sodium vapor 40011 13' 1``~/KIVH Mercury 5.140/KWH 105 KWH LM2 100011 Mercury Vapor Vapor 5.144/I<1411 159 KWH J w + !-,013 5. 140/KW1I 153 KWH 380 KWH APPLICATION Applicable to other unmeterecl ligl~tir~q services, NET 1,1q, N` HLy HAT-k lot tts 11000 x Hours used her Month x 5,140/KWH 1,000 TYPE-- VI' SERVTCL At the Cityts available Secondary voltage and phase. I_'_YMENT Bills are due when rendered, and be Within 15 calendar days from date of come past due if not paid MAINTENANCE D ARGE issuance, Maintenance expenses bill,,c, at cost., SPECIAL FACIL.I1'IES All services which cirire customer's service special ' facil far special al Yequ r i eriements shall be prov dec} in order. ities rider, to meet object to the PAG1 23 -'T T_ - _s .{rraul,t NO, SCHEDULE LO OTHER LIGHTING LOA APPLICATION Applicable to state and Local Government agencies that install and maintain their own street lights, other than the City of Denton. BULB WATTAGE NET DIONTHLY RATE FACTOR LS1 25OW Sodium Vapor 5.144/KWf; 105 KWH LS2 4001; Sodium Vapor 5.144/KWH 159 KWH LM1 40OW Mercury Vapor. 5.140/KWfi 153 KWH LM2 1000W Mercury Vapor 5.140/K1114 380 KWH LOS APPLICfl'I'ION Applicable to other tinmetered lighting services. NET MONTHLY M' E Total Watts x Hours used per Month x 5.140/KWH 1,000 TYPE OF SERVICE At the City's available secondary vol.tacle and phase. PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. , MAI tPENANCE CHAg_QE, Maintenance expenses billed at cost.. I SPECIAL FA~11_I_T'TEs All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special. facilities rider. PAGE 23 •r~ y ENERGY COS:_nDJUSTMENT 0/5 A charge per KWII of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in accordance with Schedule ECA. i ~s I I PAGE 24 WIN! 4 N(!iW,I'k(. __9aC WQ3o_...__ 1).Ito -----y SCHEDULE LT J i'RFIf 1?IC LIGHTING APPLICATION Applicable to State and Local Government agencies that operate and maintain their own traffic signals. NET MONTH-L-Y RATE 5.144 per KWII II All 1<tilli Ty PE Or SE42VIIN, At the City's available secondary voltage and phase. PAYMEN'P Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. MAINTENANCE CRANE Maintenance expenses billed at cost. SPECIAL FACILITIES All servic(.s which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. _ E,tLFaG_Y_COcLp_Lr)jkqTMENI A charge per KSdH of energy taken f ,)r fuel cost calculated in accordance with Schedule ECA. I PAGE 25 4 SCHEDULE DD DUSK 'I'O_UAI~N LIGHTING APPLICATION Applicable to ally customer within the area served by the City's electric distribution system for outdoor area lighting when such lighting facilities tire operated as an extension of the city's distribution system. NET MONTHLY RAPE (1) Facility Charge See table (2) Eneray`Cost Adjugtment. Current ECA x monthly bulb wattage factor F'ac_l ity_ Charcfg Bu ].b Wattage Factor DSA 10OW (odium Vapor $ 7.50 48 KWH DSB 250W :radium Vapor $ 9.75 105 KWH DSC 400W Sodium Vapor $12.00 159 KWH DMA 175W heronry Vapor $ 6.25 70 KWH DMB 250W Mercury Vapor $ 7.25 98 KWH DMC 400W Mercury Vapor $ 8.00 153 KWH TYPE OF SERVICE The City shall furnish, install., maintain and deliver electric service to automatEca.lly controlled, mercury or sodium vapor light- ing fixtures conforming to the City's standards and subject to its published rules and regulations. Where necessary for proper illumination or where existing poles are inadequate, the City will install or cause to be installed, one (1) pole for each installed light, at a distance not to exceed eighty (801) feet from said existing lines, at no charge to the customer. Each additional pole span shall not exceed a span spac- ing of one hundred (1001) feet. Additional poles required to in- stall a light in a customer's specifically desired location, and not having a I~ght installed on same, shall bear the cost. PAYMENT i - Bills are due when rendered, and become-_ past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. TERM OF._CONTRAC`1' i A two year contract shall be agreed to and signed by each customer desiring Dusk-tc-Dawn Lighting Service authorizing fixed monthly charges, which may be reviewed annually, and to be applied PAGE 26 T t to the monthly municipal utilities bill. In the event that a cs tomer desired the removal of the unit or discontinuance of the ser- vice prior to completion of two (2) years, the remainder of the ' contract period shall become due and payable. After the end of the ' initial two (2) year contract, service shall continue on a month- to-month basis and may be cancelled by either party upon thirty (30) days notice. I SPECIAL FACILITIES All service which requires special facilities in order to meet the customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to special faoilit.ies rider. PRORATION OF UTILITY BILL, Billing fox the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual. days in_reading__period_ x customer facility charge 30 ENERGY COST.ADJUSTMENT A charge per KWH of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in accordance with Schedule ECA. 4ufcv\PAG1 27 Ag SCHEDULE T1 '1'E;MPOF3F~F2Y_ SERVICE (Effective 10/07/92) APPLICATION Applicable when a customer requests electric service on a short term or temporary basis where a customer has received a permit from ed. the City after the c ertif'icate of occupancy ptl as been issu not applicable NET MONTHLY RP.TF_. (1) Facility Charge Single Phase $15.00/30 days Three Phase $20.00/30 days (2) Energy Charge 6.56{/Mqf{ (3) Energy Cost Adjustment Current ECA Schedule MINIMUM BIiLING Facility charge TYPE OF SERVICL. At the City's available secondary supply. PAYMENT •a.•,.' Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days frown date of issuance. ADDITIONAL 'T'EMPORARY S_ERV[CI:_CIIARGFS Labor. (Regular Time) f6o0r eac111additionalohouro(to be6mea- sur.ed to the nearest-. one-quarter hour) Labor (Overtime) $75.00 minimum up to 1 hour. $75.00 for each additional hour. (to be mea- sured to the nearest one-quarter hour). Premium time to be added where applica- ble. Transportation ro be billed by hours or miles, as applicable, according to the estimated cost of operating the equipment. PAGE 28 I 14,111 Oil Plo. Material Material that cannot be salvaged to be billed at Stores cost plus 25$ and applicable sales tax. At the time a temporary service is re- j moved or converted, any loss in the material installed clue to negligence or willful action by the customer will be billed separately to customer at Stores cost plus 25% and sales tax. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet the customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to special facilities rider, see section 25-23(e) for standard re- quirements. PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual days in.,read ing_per.iod _ x customerfagili_.1 charge 30 ENERGY CHARGE Billing for the energy charge shall be based on actual KWH con- sumption during the billing period, { Formula: K4VH in raft: block x Rate per KW11 in rate block ENERGY COSY ADJUSTMENT A charge per KWH of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in accordance with Schedule ICA. PAGE,. 29 t A,!(wO No D,;la y a J~ SCHEDULE P1 ~f 1N`IF32RUP'I'S13L1 _Pk iIIAy F,RVICF (Feeective 10/07/92) I pPPLT CA`1'I ON June, July, Applicable to all customers taking primary monthss e orvif vice power load exceeding 1,000 KVA during the -)rovided service subject August and September and is, by ront;ract, 4' retains the lo~dhreductionigo .ls to load interruptions. The C.it.y number of customer.. on this rate if the city are met. NE`r MONT}iLY CHARGE (Estimated transmission firm) Charge $70.00/'30 days acility (1) F 0.2 0(~IKW}l Energy Charge $ 4.00/lCS+l (3) Demand Charge Cost Adjustment Current ECA Schedule (4) Energy PAYMENT Bills are due %.rhen rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calm.tar days from date of issuance. MINIMUhf SIi,LTNG An amount equal to the demand charge as calculated below but not less than one hundred percent (1000 of the maximum monthly KW i ous billing months of MAY Simi .lar.ly determined during the prev h OCTOBER in the 12 months ending With tile current month, no through 000 KW. LESS than 1, •rYpE OF SERVI_CF, Interruptible primary voltage service (transformation equipment customer with a bl 12-month upte pr- customer; is available to any owned by demand of 5, 00o KW or. greater, Interrremises atla ,pint on the customer p base at the mamininy semum rvice monthlr eyndered at one } nominal voltago ]3,2.00 volts or G9, 000 volts thr.ee'p option of the 'iti].ity. and The primary voltage service customer shall own, operate, receive Lhree phase primary m transformation facilities required for maintain all f_Icilities necessar'Y to r operate and voltage service and all or. secondary el own, conversion to utilization voltage. `}'he City Shall ects to meter. f maintain aatl Ili- acilltleS, either at primary thooOti].ity's option. Where the City voltage, voltage, two percent shall YIe added to the demand at secondary PAGE, 30 t . ~U o ' G charge, the energy charge and the energy cost adjustment charge t account for transformer losses. DETERMINA`PION OF I)L IAND The demand shall be determined by the KW supplied during the e period of demand meter, but, l' not tlessGthann 100% month determined of the determined by y months maximum monthly Kw similarly determined during the billing ourrent throug, OCTOBER ithalne110010oKwhs immediately preceding the POWER FAC'POR REQUTR_ _ T5_ AID Al7JUS`I'hII N''S EML] The City preserves the right to make tests to determine the r' power factor of the user's installation served hereunder Suring periods of maximum demand for the monthly billing periods. ercent, the the power factor so rpses w~llebreedetermined by0%multiplying the demand for billing puulpo percent and dividing uncorrected Kw billing demand by ninety (90a) I by the determined power factor. SPECIAL FACIL111'TL_S nt- All service which requires special facilities in d erto teto the customer'-; service requirements shall be provide subj facilities rider. PRORATION OP U`PTLI7'Y_ B1L1-.S (a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill- ings annually. Formula; Actua1_ days__n _readinc3__11el-iocl x customer facility c arge 30 (b) Billing for demand shall Iforc longer o shorter chilling month basis and nd prorated periods. Formutao Actupl da s_ n tegading_I2 rind x Kw Demand X Rate 30 ENERGY CHAnGE Billing for the energy charge shall be based on actual KWH consumption during the billing period. r~ g~1!, PAGE 31 INI r{~onda Flo. y~.= -G~D NIP Formula: KWH in rate b7._~ck x Rate per KMI in rate block ENERGY COST AD; U_ggrMF i Per KI4H of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in A charge p accordance with schedule CCA, PAGE 32 i ~';Publf~d IIO. SCHEDULE AF ATHLETE' FULD APPLICATION Applicable to all electric service metered at one point for use to light specified areas for athletic events where such electrical use will not occur between the hours of 10:00 A.M. and 7:00 p.M. NE1' MONTHLY RATE (1) Customer Facilities Charge Single phase $20.00 per 30 days Three Phase $30.00 per 30 days (2) Energy Charge Billing months of_June__t}ii_otigll Sel~temberT All Other Hours (Off Peak) 3.75 per KWH 1,00 PM to 8:00 PM (Peak) 7.50G per KWH (Weekdays excluding city Holidays) Ililli}ig me nths og ocLoher LllrotiC li_ Mav: All hours 3.75(;/KWH (3) Demand Charge Billing ttPnths -of June t)rOLIgh_SQ2tp All Other Hours (Off.' Peak) $1,00 per Kiq per 30 days 1:00 PM to 8:00 PM (Peak) $4.50 per KPI per 30 days Rill_in~c_monCh_~___of OcaoYler_throulz_13 All hours $1,00 per KW per 30 days (4) Energy Cost AdjUsL'ment Current F,CA Schedule MINIMUM ElTf,f,ING, Facility Charge PACF. 33 tl I 1 i 1 ZY-H_OF SERVICE; At the City's available secondary voltage and available phase, For use only between the hours of 7:00 P.M. and 10:00 A.M. from June through September and all hours from October through May. POWER FACTOR The City reserves the right to make tests to determine the power factor of the customer's installation served during periods of maximum demand or by measurement of the average power factor for the monthly billing period. If the potter factor- is below ninety percent, the demand for billing Purposes will be determined by multiplying the uncorrected Kit billing demand by 90% and dividing by the determined power factor. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF UTILITY BII,f,S (a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill- ings annually, Formula: Actual days in _rog, iijg enLi cl x customer charge 30 (b) Billing for demand shall be calculated on a 30 day per month basis and prorated for longer or shorter billing periorls. Formu:?.a: Actual dalS _in readi-ncl_pe_ri,od x KW demand x Rate 30 ENERGY CHARGE Billing for the energy charge shall be based on actual KWH con- sumption during the billing period. Formula: KWH in rate block x Rate per KW11 in rate block ENERGY COS"'_ AhJU03T4EN11' A charge per KWH of energy taken for fuel. cost calculated in accordance with Schedulr. ECA. PAGE: 34 SCHEDULE ES Fll`Ib NIA1N'PINFIIJCU SERVICE STANnY~ .`iUP[?LYtIINPARY (r:ffective to//0~/~2) APPIOICATION to customers who: Applicable in all areas served by the city enerati.on facility ovre.r g _ total (l) ov7n and/or operate an electric p ovin al used for non-emergncy uses and which has a a ~acity (wh ichever is seelectrio nameplate or effective carallel witll tIleo y,the custom- power fifty (50) KSJ or m ore in Parallel f.or the purpose of gene ~ er's own consumption, and ,s else- ccuipment or.cli is com~tlble with the C ty I hi point and which (2) employ 1 the customer de]ivery s stem or t the City s electperso el, and tric system a to will cause no damage equipment. or present undue Hazards to City f which and/ scats an electrica l generating facility or op b a registered professional (3) own or Independent Power has peen certified annuthe utility and reliable in engineer practicing u production Industry to be a fnctioning generating facility' generating system at },east electrical t~ovrer J (4) operate ans eannually- 6,500 hour, and parallel (5) execute an agreement for inter-connection operation with the City i INTERCONNECTIOi~_ Cos'P ment or e City for any equip 1 the customer The customer shall reimburse Of i:tt r,Ystem. fa uired as a result f the installation ,r P1cctY.is cilities req fa generation in parallel with the city to extend its of I a] 1 costs of the City or at The customer shall pa y parallel operation of the facilities or. m edin order t tot11~ -rmil}te [ in te rconr,ection, some futurefac~i~lit.y. customer's 7 YpN of SEK~rICL 60cycles at alternating current's stem most available The City shall supply electric imary voltage customer the voltage and phase of the City Me p to receive City to the location of tH-e customer. operate and maintain .11, facilities ne; sa. shall own, 1 service and all tr.ansformatiotThe City three phase primary voltage utili.zat.ion volta% either at t ilities, ties required for conver sion to ties own rper.ate and maintain a1I. metering fac PAGE 3'> it Tom, ~ r \1 primary or secondary voltage, at the City's option. Where the Ci y elects to meter at secondary voltage, the secondary energy and on- peak demand che.rges shall aphlY• NET i•i0(JTHLY Rl+TF Primary secondary Service Service_ (1) Facility charge $60.00/30 days $25.00/30 days (2) Demand Charges: On-Pkuak Demand $11.00/KW $11.00/KW System Demand $ 4.0011«a $ 4.00/KSV (3) Energy Charges: 0 ?/KS41I 0.5G/KWH Non-Emergency Energy 15. 201KWII 5.3q/KWH Emergency Fnergy (5) Energy Cost Adjustment Per ECA Per Sch ECA MINIMUM BILLING The minimun monthly billing shall be, the highest. of the follow- ing: toe On-Peak (1) The still) of the iusthe tonier°t ,,a tl i u~dCharge, Charge, Demand Charge, n (2) A charge of $1.00 per KVA of Installed transformer capaci- ty. DETERMTNA`i'IUN OF .ON_PFF11(_~FMAIJll The on-peek demand shall be determined by the KW demand supplied by tl!e City during the fifteen (15) minute period of maximum use during the on-peak hours as recorded by the City's demand meter a+ul adjusted for poser factor, but not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the maximum on-peak demand which occurred during the billing months of June through September in the twelve (12' months im%.ediately preceding the current month. DFT K__LtE LAND_ _COGPNCRAPION UNT'11S ,NOT ERMTNATIUN OF nN_PFA OPERlfPIN(LI <US'COMFRS. PFAK _DID NOT _CONTk27I3LITE__TO CITY!S ANNUAE, SYS'PEM PFAK If a customer's cogeneration unit(s) is/are off during peak hours, and the customer's peak did not contribute to the City's annual system peak, and the cogeneration unit is one (1) MW or larger, then the nameplate rating of the customer's unit(s) shall be deducted from the peak demand. PAGE, 36 I The customer shall be charged the appropriate on-peak demand charges for the KW supplied by the City for the succeeding twc: ve (12) months, 2 E'PERMINA'1'ION OF _SYSTEM DEMA Q The :system demand shall be determined by the sum of the KW demand supplied during the fifteen (15) minute period of maximum use as recfdethe c.bcustomCity's demand mjter, plus the KW nameplate of rating(s) In no event shall the system demand be less than seventy per- cent (70%) of the maximum on-peak demand similarly determined dur- immediately months Septber nth in the twelve (12) moing the I)ETERMSNAT CON_ OF__ NON-f MERG1 NCY ENE_RCY. All energy supplied to customers whose) generating units are less than one (1) MW capacity. DLTEERMIN&TION_ of_ EMLwgENC Y j',w IzcY_ Emergency energy is all energy supplied by th City during peak custom- hours of operation to displace energy normally supplied by er`,, one (1) MW or larger unit.. POIP! R FAC''fIR .PENAL' The City reserves the right to determine the power factor of the customer's Lnstallati.on served during periods of maximum demand or by measurement of the average power factor for the monthly bill- ing period. If the power factor is below ninety percent (90%) dur- ing on-peak hours, the demand for billing purposes will be deter- mined by multiplying the uncorrected KW billing demand by 90% and dividing by the determined power factor.. The formula is as fol- lows: Unaijusted_I i.1111ig_di nmand x .9 Determined power factor DEFINITION_ OE_ ON7:L EAK _HOURS 8 00 P M. each Prow 1 :EOt0 1).`M. otot 1 Thee idesignated sh being for th ule, ar I Monday through Friday. I DEFINITION _OT_OF'T~l?L??nl(__ ~JOQI2,, The City's off-peak hours, for the purpose, of this rate sched- tile, shall be all hour.,, not designated as on-peak hours. PAGE 37 D ~ -4 i/ 57SPECIAL FAQ TLI7'TS All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF U'III,iTY BILLS (a) Billing for demand shall be calculated on a 30 day per month basis and prorated for longer or shorter billing periods using the following formula: Actual days in reading period x Customer Charger 30 r (b) Billing for demand shall be calculated on a 30 day per month basis and prorated for longer or shorter billing periods using the folloi,+ing formula: Actual_ days in reading-.per_iod x KW Billing Demand x Rate 30 I ENERGY CHAPGE Billing for energy shall be based on actual K41I consumption during the billing period. Formula: K1911 in rate block x Rate per KWH in rate block CREDIT FOR ENERGY DELIVERED-IN-TO-CITY'S SYSTEM DURING ON-PEAK HOURS If Customer-produced energy is fed back into the City's system during on-peak hours, an amount equal to fuel. cost calculated in accordance with. Schedule E.C.A., as applicable to such energy is credited monthly, provided that. Customer has paid the City "or necessary added metering, protective and other equipment as deter- mined by the city. CREDIT FOR ENERGY ___p] L[Vf I21;U_INIQ_ CITY'S SYSTEM DURING OFF-PEAK HOURS If Customer-produced energy is fed back into the City's system during off-peak hours, an amount equal to $0.01241 per KWH (for each KWH delivered back into the City's system) will be credited monthly, provided that Customer has p,iid the City for necessary added metering, protective 1Ld other equipment as determined by the city. PAGE 38 ■ I I`ncnd:~l;am ~y ~ ENFRCY COS `I AD3USTMFN`I` D A charge per KWH of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in accordance with Schedule EM. PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within twenty (20) calendar days from date of issuance, LINE PAYMEIJT CHARGES Sills are considered past due if not received within twenty (20) calendar days and shall be accassed a late payment charge of one and one-half percent (1,50) per month an any unpaid balance. N PAGE 39 SCHEDULE DL DECORATIVE LIGHTING APPLICATION Applicable to any customer on the perimeter of the square ser- ved by the City's electric distribution system for outdoor area lighting when sack lighting facilities are operated as an extension of the city's distribution system. NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Facility charge $3.70 (2) Energy Cost Adjustment Current: ECA x Monthly Bulb Watt- age Factor based on 415 KWH per. Customer 'T'YPE OF SERVICE The City shall. furnish, install, maintain and deliver electric service to auto,nat.ically controlled lighting fixtures conforming to the City's standards and subject to its published rules and regula- tions. The service is provided between dusk and midnight. PAYMENT I Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid k within 15 calendar clays from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All service which requires special facilities in order to meet the customer':; service requirements shall be provided subject to special facilities rider. PRORATION Of UTILITY BALLS Billing for the Facility Charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formuia: Actual.- day;; in re_~ding._pe r_ od x Facility Charge I~ 30 ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT A charge per 1<WH of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in accordance with Schedule ECA. I PAGE. 40 1 01 SCHEDULE IDR G/ INDLJS'PRTALLI--LOMIC UI;VFIUPt^ll,'NT RIDER ' I AVAILABILITY I This rider is available to the customers who receive service from either of City's Rate Schedules GSS or GSL. APhLICATION This rider is available to electric service supplied at any one rA location and measured through one meter. This is for firm electric service applicable to new customers and existing customers as de- scribed below. (1) New customers whose electric service represents demand not previously served by the city at any location in the City's service area in the last 12 months and where such metered demand is in excess of 200 KW. (2) Existing customers: served under Rate Schedules GSS or GSL who add additional metered demand of at: least 200 KW on top of their existing level of demand. This additional load will be separately metered. Under no circumstances may this rider be used to reduce the current amount of other firm service billed to the customer. Dur- ing the term of this agreement, the customer may not reduce other firm service peak demand. NET MONTHLY RATE The custoinor shall he charged under the appropriate applicable rate schedules with the exception that the monthly billing demand or system demand will be adjusted in accordance with the following table: Reduction tc Billing Time Period !)emend or._Sy_'tem.Demand First Year 50% AO% Second Year. 40% Third Year 2.0% Fourth Year 10% Fifth Year CONTRACT _UMI.QD The term of the contract will be a five-year period. PAGE 41 4 i I i a ~ G~f SCHEDULE TS A rfl ect'iveG1'o/07/g2 )SVY, _APRI, CATI0t7 _ to be on Time-of fs'a rat Mine Applicable to ally customer t'I' agTal 5tor.age facility for five (5) years and who has a thermal imum storage capacity of 5001000 13`1'U. f?AYf_~Fi3`PS 12MAL S'I OR11Gk;_ 1.NCf l33'IVC TILE y250/K14 First 500 KW shifted to off -p-' $12`;/3CW Addi tonal YW shifted s qualifying to off-peak The yments shall be made to q rmal storage incentive pa customers based on the f0110t1ing method: shall be submitted t1o }~eei)equipioentf shalltbe che p design Vie thermal ! aeity (nfU). ties for app rTY1e royal. KW and output cap to a maximum of ric demand (KW) )a incentive Payme the for input elect limited nt system shall )'e for 10,00o 67'U per 500 square feet for the conditioned area o faci lity to be served. e units the thermal storage units upon completion, the input. output of '11he customer may Observe will be measured by the City of llenton. ll i.nfarma; ion all c1 calculations for the actual s or and ecuiim~c»t used to citculate fluid ize or air be the vfaerciilfy aity. Au?.iii ,,ate under normal lje pay menu. handlers %.1hi~},'j ;ou at> I q the Y'kq load for incentive included in i i PAGE 42 I 7 r \ r; SCHEDULE TS TIIERPIAi, STORAGE _TNCENTIVE (Effective 10/07/92) APPLICATION Applicable to any customer tgho agrees to be on Time-of-Use rate for five (5) years and who has a thermal storage facility of a min- imum storage capacity of 500,000 BTU. THERMAL STORAGE INCENTIVE PAYMENTS First 500 KW shifted 52501Ki9 to off-peek hours Additional KW shifted $125/KI9 to off-peak hours Thermal storage incentive payments shall be made to qualifying customers based on the following method; A design shall be submitted to the Director of Electric Utili-• ties for approval. The thermal storage equipment shall be checked for input electric demand (KW) and output capacity (BTU). The system shall I,e limited for incentive payment to a maximum of 10,000 BTU per 500 square feet for the conditioned area of the facility to be ,erved. Upon completion, the input--output of. the thermal storage units will be measured by the city of Denton. The customer may observe and verify all information :ind calculations for the actual size of the facility. Auxiliary equipment used to circulate fluid or air handlers which would operate under normal peak periods will not be included in calculating the 149 load for incentive payments. ' PACIP 4 2 -T- SCHEDULE UPS UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY APPLICATION Applicable to any customer who, by written agreement, receives service for interruptible POWer supply for a computer or other electrical equipment. Not applicable for resale service in any event, nor to tempo- rary or standby service except in conjunction with applicable rider. NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Customer Facility Charge: 250 W Power. Standby Unit: $ -1.55/30 days 1,200 W Power Standby Unit $30.95/30 days (2) Tnsta lation Charge $25.00 For any W Power Standby Unit other than above, the monthly customer charge will be based on the following formula: (1) Monthly Cnarge: 5% of Annual Maintenance Cost PLUS + 12 months +1I 6% Annual.._Returrl_of°Investment PLUS 1 12 months 8% Interest on a 5 Year I,ife TYPE OF SEiWICE The City .hall furnish, install, maintain an automatically controlled alternating current power backup unit: conforming to the city's standards and subject to its published rules and regula- tions. PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILI'Pif';s All services WrIich require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PAGE: 4 3 e~ 1 I PRORATION OF i3l'TI,ITY BILLS (a) Billings for the Pacilit), charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula; Actual days in reading-period x customer facility c`•arge 30 days PAGE 44 1~1 1 SCHEDULE ECA ~Fjls J F.NF.I2GYCOST- P DJUSTfii NT (Effective 10/07/92) ENERGY 9-00t_AD7USTME14 T All monthly KWH charges shall F)e increased or decreased by an amount equal to "X" cents per K44H, to be known as the energy cost adjustment (ECA). The ECA shall be computed in the months of April and October to be applied to the following periods e of a ity s trough October and November. through April respectively. no case change energy the . adjustment Ihe ECA shall be calculated ltwice in culated bytthe of the six (G) months periods following formula: ' ECA (Winter) = Proj-ected_cncrgy_cost for winter months Projected KW11 sales for winter months ECA (Summer) = Protected-energy cost for summer months Projected KW11 sales for summer months The above Formula results; in Winter 199Z/93 and Summer 1993 ECA's as follows: ECA (Winter) = 1.70C/KNIT ECA (Summer) = 1.70C/KWEI variabed In the event that actual cumulative tE of fuel, and costs of Texas Municipal Power Agency (I"MPA) energy energy (excluding TMPA's fixed charges) is greater than or less than the cumulative ECA revenues by $1,0000000 during the fiscal year, the City may recompute the Energy Cost Adjustment and re- establish an ECA that collects or returns such difference over the remaining months of the fiscal year. such change in ECA shall be applied evenly to all remaining months' FICA. PAGE 4 5 11 ida 'gin, 9oC SCHEDULE APR e, 5- APPLIANCEREDATB (Effective 10/7/92) I App"tication Pr~ram..Summ~r•y The City of Denton Utility Department is offering cash payments to customers who purchase and install high efficiency air conditioners or heat pumps in new or existing residential or commercial facilities, The program's objective is to reduce energy demand and con- sumption, theroby saving customers dollars on their utility bills and reducing the peak load of the City of Denton's electric system. Prggam Guidelines 1. All installations must be for accounts served by the City of Denton Utility Department and must meet all applicable national, local, and manufacturers' codes and specifica- tion.,-,. 2. To qualify for a rebate, equipment must be new when in- stalled. 3. All equipment must be purchased. No leased or lease/ purchaso equipment will qualify for a cash rebate. 4. Installations must be made by licensed contractors and *or dealers. 5. No re.bate will be paid on a partial replacement of an air cond'-tioner. the compressor, condenser and the evapora- tor i:oil must be replaced to qualify for a rebate. 6. Payments for residential central cooling systems, which includes apartments and mobile homes, will be limited to a capacity based on a minimum of 500 conditioned square feet per ton. 7. The conditioned area in square feet is required on each residential central system request for payment. 8. The rebate will be paid to the purchaser of the qualify- ing equipment upon verification of compliance with program guidelines 9. Requests for payment must be received by the Director of Electric Utilities within GOdqy_s of installation. 10. Equipment and installation are subject to inspection by the city's Building Inspection Department before final approval for payment is issued. PACE. 4 6 11. The Appliance Rebate Program guidelines and payments ale subject, to change err.thout notice The Appliance Rebate Program may be discontinued without 12. time by the City of Denton. prior notice at any 1. GE14ERA1, PROCEDURES A. App'-i.cation )li- 'Po determine who qualifies for a rebate, an ai'L on for rebate must be completed and set to the cation of Elect-ric Utilities athifla60 daY_!L_O i ip tinq Director. Of the equipment. installation dealers have rebate application forms and wtl complete these forms f'or the purchaser. It is the purchaser's respo+i;aibility to see that the dealer completes the form and submits it to the Director o". Electric Utilities. B. Inspections inspected 1 Installations of central systems will be by the city"; F3uilding Inspees cti wionll be Debar processeda host be approved before rebai: C. payments to Particip~;~1t`ash payments trill be made to the bur-chaser of the icipating retail equ e qualifying equipment. Part t ment dealers will receive a cash paymen of $20 p per unit for the sale of windotr units, central air conditioning aystE=++ts or heat pumps ato offset their pplications, Cost for properly filling out the app onsible purchasees. Program participants are resp for submitting the correct inl:ormatipSl onal The ilti paymlent ty Department trnot, issue any additi nt eras incorrect due to a mistake unles.; the ;a L.ywe employee. in processing by a City L 1 yments to dealers . i'he tweni.y dollar pa will be made only if 1. they supply the qualify- ing equipment to the customer oofk~Liedequi is paying for the installation denied went. Dealers '11)(i purchasers may be guide- payment for failure to follow program lines suc}1 as; failing to supply correct c;quare footage or SEER/Ir,L'.R fiqur.la~ingSpartiof equipment. which ir; not near; r.ep a split sygtem7 or failure to fill out rebate forms properly. PAGE. 4'? I I I I Tyy 7 7 11. The Appliance Rebate Program guidelines and payments ate 5 l subject, to change without notice. 12. The Appliance Rebate Program may be discontinued without prior notice at any time by the City of Denton. I. GENEfcAL PROCCDURES A. Application To determine who qualifies for a rebate, an appli- cation for rebate must be completed and set to the Director of Electric Utilities within 60 days of n s - a_12 ati_O 11 of the equipment. Participating dealers have rebate application forms and will complete these forms for the purchaser. It is the " purchaser's responsibility to see that the dealer completes the form and submits it to the Director of Electric Utilities. B. Inspections Installations of central systems will be inspected by the City's Building Inspection Department and must be approved before rebates will be processed. C. Payments to Participant:, •_Iash payments will be made the purchaser of the qualifying equipment. Partici.p<'ting retail equip- ment dealers will receive a cash payment of $20 per unit for the sale of window units, central air conditioning :.ystems, or heal: pumps to offset their cost for properly filling out the applications for purchasers. Program participants are responsible for submitting the correct information. The Utili- ty Department will not issue any additional payment unless the payment was incorrect due to a mistake in processing by a City employee. 1. `t'he. twenty dollar ($20.00) payments to dealers will be made only if they supply the qualify- ing equipment to the customer or builder who is paying for the installation of the equip- ment, Dealers and purchasers may be denied payment for failure to follow program guide- line-3 such aes: failing to supply correct square footage or SEER/EER figures; installing equipment wt)ich is not new; replacing part of a split system; or failura to fill, out rebate fora, properly. PAGE, 47 h 2. payments will be made to customers who PurV chase and install new qualifying equipment. If a tenant purchases and installs qualifying equipment, the payment is made to the tenant. If the owner of- rental property purchases and installs qualifying equipment, the payment is made to the ot,mer. If the purchaser of a mobile or custom home selects and pays for a qualifying unit, the purchaser will receive the rebate, iI. CENTRAL ELECTRIC AIR CONDITIONERS AND HEAT PUMPS A. A new condensing unit with an inside evaporator coil will qualify if matched, as specified, in the current issue of the ARI Directory of Certified Air Conditioners and Air Source Heat Pumps and the unit meets the minimum ratings as specified in the 1.992 Appliance Rebate Program. If the unit is riot in the current ART Directory, the manufacturers' latest data approved for publication will be accepted. if the unit is not in the current ART Directory or data approved for publication, the average of the high and low SEER/EER coil only, not including blower coil., will be accepted as listed in the current ANT Directory, B. computer simulations may be used if ratings are not listed in the current ART Directory, provided the following criteria are met: { 1. Systems using mix-matched coils must meet all I y° established program guidelines to qualify for a rebate, 2. The computer simulations must be signed, certified, and dated by a r_egi.stered rofes- sionai ei gi~neer and an officer of the company making the submittal. 3• The engineer who certifies a simulation must attest to the accuracy of the input data, the validity of the calculation procedure used, and that the results are in accordance with D.O.E. approved methodology, 4. A complete set. of the :input data and an indi- cation of the source of the data must accompa- ny the simulated ratings, 5. The simulated ratings must be bas-id on the condensing unit's t_sted combination as listed in the current ARI Directory or latest data PAGE 48 i f ~2 z approved for publication and identified by ue correct model numbers of both the condensing unit and coil as listed in the current ARI Directory. 6. Simulated ratings must not exceed 1050 of the SEER rating of the tested system used as a base. 7. An open file of computer simulations will be maintained at the Energy Management Office. Supplying erroneous ratings or data can lead to disqualification of those involved from further program participation. C. Program Capacity and Payment Formula 1. The maximum allot-able I3TU per hour capacity eligible for a residential rebate: is deter- mined by dividing the square footage of the conditioned area by 500 and multiplying by 12,000. I Example: The Program Capacity for a 1,500 square foot house is: __1150 3.0 x 12,000 36,000 BTUH 500 The City will pay a rebate on a unit that meets program efficiency standards and is sized at 36,000 STAN or less. 2. Actual payment will be determined by dividing the RTUFI of the installed unit (up to, and including tea.' the Program Capacity) by 12,000 and multiplying by the incentive. The incentive amounts and SEER ratings are refer- enced on page 5 and are incorporated herein as if fully set forth at length; Example A: A person In a 1,500 square foot house installs a 30,000 BTUH central air conditioner with a SEER rating of 12.0. 1.5g0 = 3 x 1.2,000 - 36,000 Program Capacity 500 30,000 = 2.5 x $75/tan = $187.50 Rebate Amount 12,000 PAGE 49 9 l p Example 13: A person in a 2,000 square foot h tYse instals a 60 000 BTUH central ai conditioner with a SEER rating of 12.0. , 1 2. 000 4 x 12,000 - 48,000 Program Capacity 500 48X000 4 x $75/ton $300 Rebate Amount 12,000 Example C: A person in a 2,000 square foot house installs a 60,000 BTUH central heat pump with a SEER rating of 12.0. 2,000 = 4 12,000 - 48,000 Program Capacity 500 48,000 = 4 x $100/ton - $400 Rebate Amount Minimum SEER/EER k2at_i.19 Incentive Centralir Col,dit_onincd Single Phar'~ (SEER) 1~.0 $ 11000/t0/toonn Three Phase (EER) Central Heat Prim , Single Phase (SEER) 12.0 $100/ton 17 0 $100/ton Three Phase (EER) 10.0 $ 50/unit Room_ Air Conditi_oiiee_s 10.0 $ 50/unit Room Heal Pump, 12.0 $500/unit Geothermal f[eaY:____PuIvq * Refer to 111992 Appliance Rebate Program: Methods Used in Determining Equipment Efficiency and Eligibility" * For calculation purposes, one ton equals 12,000 BTUH PAGE 50 : i 1 . SCHEDULE ACR AIi2_CONI IT[4PI1?{? CYcij!"G__RED 1L (Effective 10/07/92) 4~1'LICATION the city of DentOll This schedule is av,1 fable to ally cu, tto rate schedules R-11 R- Utility Who is served and billed system With has a central. air conditioning ho agrees to GSS/GSL and G1, 2, r minimum connected compressor outp ut of 2.5 tons an w o to install a control device to his/her ai . permit the utility c will enable th r to c conditioning system. The devi.ce utility to cortr. ol Utility ods of shall the operation of. the air conditioneroomitions during he periods the utility's peak load and emerclencY ` ht to interrupt se r vice to the compressor unit for right iq have the approximately seven and one-half minutEpe k to d Condit ons are eak load conclit.ions. 30 of. each year. interval. during p defined as being from June 1 through September TERMS AND CONDITIONS time by applying A Customer may apply for this schedule o'it ally f. Denton utility. newable for and entering into a contract v+itlt the City year and shall be rlication and contract shall be fora term of: one l the Cu the stomer amount shall, Of additional one year terms. Upon appuova l of the app installation of the load reduction dc'~LOe+ (tons) receive a monthly credit on his/her utility bilel which shall be based upon the customer's compressor date output the load credit shall be the The start date. for receiiind on thirty is installed 0n the co edm~ressnr. and tested EOr l thirty reduction device proper operation. The amount of the cr is base up (30) day billing cycle and prorated according to the start date. The amount of credit (d t 01) qa natl1PYj;il.)l.e customer's bill shall b~ determined in the credit per Billing cycle compressor output in `Pons $10.00 2.5 to 5,0 $ ?,00 per ton All over 5.0 1s electric bill shall not exceed shall Any credit on a cu.~tomer' 11le months that the U Juity August percent (500) of said bill.. shall be June, rebate a credit to appli.cabl,e customer`s and September. PAGE' 51 sc1{EDULE VLR V0L JMTA-R-Y LQA[) RI DUCTION (Effective 70/07/92) APPLICATION This program i available to ecjou e>t bwho y agre to YeCust mers demand by a minimum of 100K4 upon r reve:' Y power under who execute contracts authorizing the City to interrupt the terms and conditions set forth in these contracts are for for credits on their utility hills. TFRMS ANI) CONDITIONS shall be provided as set forth Electric utility hill incentives in the attached contract agreements, but not to exceed twenty-four ($24.00) per KW demand. The customer will be charged acco15dingato the current rate ear. A credit the monts of applied Ltoytheu ustomer's September of eech y~. October bill. PAGE 52 h Arlr n1a ` AGREEHEHT FOR TEMPORARY REDUCTION IN DEMAND C The City of Denton, Texas, a Bowe Rule city situated in Denton County, Texas, hereinafter called 11CF11Y," acting herein by and through its Executive Director of Utilities, Robert E. Nelson and - l - - - who e address is - hereinafter caled "CUSTO1A1R," hereby mutually agree as follows: 1. APPLICATION: This Agreement is applicable only when CUSTOMER receives service during the months of July, August, and September, 1992, when service is subject to load reductions of a minimum of one-hundred kilowatts (100 ItIV) upon two hours notifica- tion by telephone by CITY'S Representative. The CITY and CUSTOMER have determined the estimated peak loads for the months of July, August, and September, 1992, for CUSTOMER to be as follows: Peak I)ema.ici: I«P Service Address: 2. DEFINITIONS: The following definitions shall apply to this Agreement: Peak KW Demand: The actual or estimated peak KW usage, whichever is greater, for the months of July, August, and September, 1992, based on historical billing records plus estimates of changes in load, equipment, etc. Maximum Demand During Reduction: Customer's maximum (or peak) demand KN that occurs durinq reduction(s) requested by the city. _Demand Reduction: Peak 104 Demand less Maximum Demand Dur- ing Reduction, Utilitv's_Peak_Day: 'rhe day on which the maximum KI4 demand is placed on the entire electrical system. I i 3. SERVICES TO BE _PERFORMED: The City has a public interest in reducing the system peak RW in or~c r to maximize the efficiency of its utility system and thus, agrees to pay CUSTOMER twenty-four ($24.00) dollars per Kw demand for a one time reduction of at least one-hundred Kw (100KW) during the month; of July, August., and September, 1992. CUSTOMER calculates the Maximum Estimated Reduc- tion in Demand to he an estimated Kw. The actual reduc- tion shall be based upon measurements taken by City's representa- tive. CITY agrees to monitor i.ti; system load and determine if a reduction in peak KId is required. CITY shall notify CUSTOMER by telephone not later than twelve noon of a day if such reduction is PAGE 53 I ,G 'red durinc that day, CUf3T0I'1lat agrees to acknowledge such requ 00 arcl "1 o'clock for ptnat day bett~teen the hours of 3: qut and reduce 100 o quest p. 4. GENE "P1, ,LING__IIIF=0F211A'1'IUfl: CUSTOMER wolthe Ccharged according to the current rate sch(~dIlle applicable to credit shall for the months -)f July, August, and September', which shall be applied to CUSTOMER'S October, 1992 bill, calculated as follows: KW Peak. KW Minimum Demand July-September, 1992 L`xxJ~ KW LESS Maximum Demand During Reduction(s) xx KW Total Demand Reduction x 24.00 Total Credit: $ xx.xx r tion 5. MT`~C!!.LLAi~l ,OU5: CUSTOMER is granted a one-time exem whereby CUSTOMER need not reduce demand by at least 100 KW from its peak KW dema!x}, However, if the cUSTOMER's one-time exemption DaY, occurs on the same date a;; the Utility's Peak this contract becomes void z,nd shall terminate immediately. If the ( 1STOMER fails, when requested, to reduce its peak demand more than 100 KW on more than one occasion, this Agreement becomes vCityand shall terminate immec.iately without furt.her notice by the . 6 j ,R effect for the period beginning I ER This Agreement is July 1, 1992 and ending at midnight, September 30, 1992. 1992. EXECUTED lhi r, day Of - - CITY OF DEN'1'oN, TEXAS CUSTOMER By : EXECUTIVE R. E. NELS ! _ - ON (Nuroc) J - DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES Address - Cliyl51nlc17i!> code 'Tele)hone Number APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: - - DC:13RA, A. DRAYOVI,rcii, CITY. ATTORNEY Account Number 1\lclcr Number By : - Coiiwee Person - - PAGE: 54 h AGREEMENT FOR TEMPORARY REDUCTION IN DEMAND The city of Denton, Texas, a home Rule City situated in Denton county, Texas, hereinafter called "CI'PY ' acting herein by and through its Executive Director oih uti itizs, Robert Nelson and follows: hereinafter called 'CUSTOMER,' hereby nnitually agree as 1. APPLICATION: `Phis Agreement is applicable y wand CUSTOMER receives service during the months of July, August, n service is subject to load reductions of a September, 1992, who S minimum of one-hundred kilowatts (100 KW) upon two hours notifica- tion by telephone by CITY'S Representative. r The C] TY and CUSTOMER have determined the estimated peak for - loads for the months of July, August, and September, 1992, TOMER to be as follows: _ i<W 1 Peak Demand: Service Address: 2.. DEFINITIONS: The following definitions shall apply to this Agreement: Peak KW Demand: The actual or estimated peak KW usage, whichever is greater., for the months of July, August, and September, 1992, based on historical billing records plus estimates of changes in load, equipment, etc. Mndi 161^ tl at noccC~rs 1}dUrin(j ecluction(s) customer's dmby the peak) derna city. Demand Re~juction: Peak i<4J Demand less 14aXi.rnum Demon During Reduction. Utili:_y! Peak Day: 'rhea day on which the maximum KSP demand is placed on the entire electrical system. 3. SERVICES TO BE _PERCC)13P?ED: 1,he city has a public interest in reducing the system peak IctP in order to maximize CUSTOMER iciency of its utility system and thus, agree.; to pay ($12.00) dollars per KW demand for a one time reduction of least one-hundred KW (1o0KW) during the months of July, August, September, 1992. CUSTOMER calculates the Maximum etimaed Reduc- actual r representa- tion in Demand to be an estimated Th tive. shall. be eased upon rnea~stirements taken by city's CITY agrees to monitor its system load and determine if a notify such reduc tion i reduction ephone notl"I ter Ithan twelveenoon Cof a day shall telephone is PAGE 55 ~ y 1 1 N L) required during that day. CU511'0I,IER agrees to acknowledges h request and reduce its load for that day between the hours of 3:00 o'clock p.m. and 7:00 o'clock p.m, ' t 4. GENERAL f3II.LI -G -INFORMATTON: CUSTOMER will be charged according to the current rate schedule applicable to the CUSTOMER for the months of July, August, and September, 1992. A credit shall be applied to CUSTOMER'S October, 1992 bill, which shall be calculated as follows: Peak KW Minimum Demand July-September, 1992 KW LESS Maximum Demand During Reduction(s) xx KW Total Demand Reduction xx - KSd x 12.00 Total Credit: .xx _Xx " 5. MTSCFLILI,ANEOUS: CUSTOMER is granted a one-time exemption whereby CUSTOMER need not reduce demand by at least 100 KW from its peak KW demand. However, if the CUSTOMER's one-time exemption occurs on the same date as the Utility's Peak Day, this contract becomes void and shall terrinate immediately. If the CUSTOMER fails, when regjested, to reduce its peak denand more than 100 KW on more than one occasion, this Agreement becomes void and shall terminate immediately without further notice by the City. 6. TERM: This Agreement is in effect: for the period beginning July 1, 1992 and ending at midnight, September 30, 1992. EXECUTED this day of -------_------_v--_-_ 1992. CUSTOMER CfTY OE DENTON, TEXAS BY: (Namc) R. E. NELSON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES Address Cily(S1[11e/Z1p Code J Telephone Numhcr APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: Account Number DEBRA A. DRAYOVITC't, CITY ATTORNEY Xleter Numhcr _ BY Contoe~ Ycrsnn - PAGE; 56 Von" . ~1 SECTION. I7.. The-it if any section, subsection, 1~arayrap}1, sentence, clause, Th phrase or word in this Ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding sha11 not affect the validity ul of the of the remaining portions of this ordina n ce, and the City City of. Denton, Texas, her.ehy declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any silt=h invalidity. SECTI,._ ON 111, That the shedule of u to the IzateF, first ll regu'lar clolillinyhcycleeonforGafter charged and appp r~ October 7, 1992. da of , 1992. PA`iSED AND APPROVED this the y 13011 CAc;TLF.BERRY1 MAYOR ATT);ST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY,. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCII, CITY A'r,r0RNEY BY: - - - PAGE 57 I 1 CITY COUNCIL : oaao 00 000 Q~oo~~oo o O F 0000000 ~ r0 L7 0 o°Q_ p o rJ ODOO01~ro N s~+oObb- - °0.°ooaoauGaoo°° - Sept_emb r_.291 1992 ~c .e CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION , i TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager RE: RECEIVE A REPORT AND HOLD A DISCUSSION ON THE WATER RATE STUDY AND PROPOSED WATER RATES AND GIVE STAFF DIRECTION RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utility Board, at their meeting of September 9. 1992, recommended to the City Council approval of the proposed fiscal year 1993 Water, rate ordinance, pending legal approval. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: The Board was initially briefed on proposed Water rate changes at the August 27th meeting. The discussion on Water rate design primarily concerned options for allocating the residential rate increase to the three block rate structure. The Board elected to select the option that allocated the rate increase to the first block rate (0-15,000 gallons). The Board also asked the staff to consider a residential rate structure that provided a minimum amount of water (21000 gallons) in the basic facility charge. After further review, the Board elected to retain the current rate structure. The overall water rate increase proposed is 5.90%. A new "Adopt a Spot" rate was introduced that supports the Keep Denton Beautiful Board efforts. Changes were proposed to the existing Government Sprinkler Irrigation ordinance to lower the costs per 1000 gallons on the basis of providing either non-interruptible or interruptible service. Exhibit I contains a summary of water rate changes. Exhibit II contains the fiscal year 1993 Water rate study and ordinance. Exhibit III contains the minutes of the September 9th Public Utility Board meeting. FISCAL SUMMARY: The proposed 5.9$ increase in Water rates would cover anticipated expenses and provide a cash net gain of approximately $35,000. i 1 ~Page 2 PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: citizens of Denton, UtilitiesLegal lDepartment, Finance eDeparttment,l Public Utilities Board, and City Council. Respectfully submitted, a r" CL .Harrell, City Manager Prepared by: award Martin, Di Ctor of H Environmental Operations/ Financial Administration Exhibit: II WaterrRate study and e or Changes dinance III. Minutes of PUB Meeting of 9/9/92 7 ^i'r r`r~l Lf CITY OF DENTON WATER UTILI CURRENT VERSUS PROPOSED MRS- Cu Proposed rrent Rate Schedule Rates Rates Residential - WR & WRN 880 8.25 314' Meter 10.50 8.80 1' Meter 15,00 14.00 1 112' Meter 16.75 16.65 2' Meter 2.40 2.22 All Gallons Black Rate - Winter 2.40 2,22 First Block Rate - Summer 3.35 3.35 Second Block Rate - Summer 420 4.20 Third Block Rate - Summer Residential outside Corporate Limits - WRE 1116 11,15 314' Meter 12,26 12.25 1' Meter 16.70 16.70 1 112' Meter 20.00 20.00 2' Meter 2.95 2,95 All Gallons Block Rate - Winter .95 First Block Rate - Summer 2 2.00 Second Block Rate - Summer .095 500 2 20 5.00 lhlyd Block Rate - Summer COn1M8fcial ndustllal -WC & WCN 1845 17.20 314' Meter 20.95 18,85 in Meter 23.60 21.80 1 112' Meter 28,85 24.30 I 2' Meter 60.00 68.75 3' Meter 110.00 114.55 4' Meter 140.00 147.30 6' Meter 165.00 166.90 8' Meter 2,65 2.50 Volume Charge11000 Gallons Commercial outside Corporate Limits - WCE 18.65 18.65 l 314' Motor t' Meter 20.60 20.60 25,9'.8 26.95 1 112' Mater 29.60 29.60 2' Meter 87.90 87.90 3' Meter 147.40 147.40 4' Meter 168.90 188.90 6' Meter 214.05 214.05 a' Meter 3.15 3,15 Volume Chargeh000 Cations Wholesale =WW1 & WW2 165x00 155.00 Facility Charge WW1 170.00 Facility Charge 'MW2 1y700.00 .00 20.00 WW1 Demand/1000 Gallons 27,40 WW2 Demand/1000 Gallons 270.4.34 .34 0.4719 Readiness to Seria11000 Gallons 0 65 0.90 Volume Chargeli000 Gallons i \I CITY OF DENTON WATER UTILfTV°'r CURRENT VERSUS PROPOSED RATE'S y ay ~z' Rate -Schedule--- Proposed Current Hates Rates Government - WG & WGN 3/4' Meter 1' Meter 13.60 12,30 1 1/2' Meter 15. 13.65 2' Meter 18. 65 65 16,95 3' Meter 23.65 19.10 4' Meter 52,75 58.30 6' Meter 92.65 82,65 ' 116.65 116.65 8' Meter 136,25 136.25 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 2,60 2.35 Local Government Irrigatlon_._ WGI j 3/4' Meter 13.60 18.30 ql 1' Meter 15,05 20.30 J 1 1/2' Meter 18,65 26.75 1 2' Meter 23.65 30.85 11 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 2.20 2.35 Sprinkler Charge Per 100 Square Feet 0.00 1.00 Adopt A Spot - WGA 3/4' Meter (Billable 3-times annually) 8.80 0,00 1' Meter 10,50 0.00 1 1/2' Meter 15.00 0.00 2' Meter 16,75 0.00 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 2,60 0.00 Govornment Raw Water - WGU Facility Charge 142,00 142.00 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 1.40 1.40 Metered Hydrant - WFH Facility Charge 30.00 27.50 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 2.65 2.50 Deposit 650,00 650.00 installation Charge 60.00 45.50 1 CITY OF DENTON WATER UTILITY CURRENT VERSUS PROPOSED RATES Jr. Rate Soheduie - Proposed Current Rates Rates Residential WR WRN 8 80 0,26 314' Meter 10.50 9,80 1' Meter 15.00 14.00 1 Meter 16.75 15.65 2' Meter 2,40 2,22 ~ All Gallons Block Rate - Winter 222 First Block Rate - Summer 23. 40 40 3,35 Second Block Rate - Summer 4 20 4.20 Third Block Rate - Summer Residential outside Corporate Limits- WRE 11 15 11.16 314' Meter 12,25 12,25 1' Meter 16.70 16.70 1 t Meter 20,00 20.00 2' Meter All Gallons Black Rate - Winter 2.95 2.95 First Block Rate - Summer 2.95 2.95 Second Block Rate -Summer 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 Third Block Rate Summer Commerclallndustrial - WC & W2 1845 17,20 314' Meter 20,25 18,85 1' Meter 23,50 21.80 1 1/2' 2' Meter Meter 28.85 24.30 2' M 60.00 68.76 3' Meter 110.00 114,55 4' Meter 140.00 147.30 8' Meter '165.00 166,90 8' Meter 2.65 2.50 Volume Chargol1000 Gallons Commercial outside Corporate Llmiis -_WCE. 3!4' Meter _ 18.55 18.65 20.50 20,60 1' Meter 25,95 25.95 I 1 1!2' Meter 29.50 29,50 2' Meter 87,90 87.90 3' Meter 147.40 147.40 4' Meter 108.90 188.90 8' Meter 214.05 214,05 e' Meter 3.15 3,15 Volume Charge11000 Gallons Wholesale - WW1 & _'NN 155.00 165.00 I Facility Charge WWI 170.00 Facility Charge WW2 170,00 WWI Demand/1000 Gallons 19.42 20.00 WW2 Demand/1000 Gallons 27.34 27.40 0,4862 0.4719 Readiness to Serve/1000 Gallons 062 0,90 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 1. CITY OF DENTON WATER UTILITY CURRENT VERSUS PROPOSED RAl`ES Rate Schedule Proposed f`~ Current Elates Rates Government_ - WG 13.60 12,30 314' Meter 15.05 13,65 i' Meter 18.65 16.95 1 1/2' 22' Meter Meter 23.65 19.10 ' M 52.75 58.30 3' Meter 92.65 92.65 4' Meter 116.65 116.65 6' Meter 8' Meter 136.25 136.25 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 2.60 2.35 Local Government irriaatl0n - WGI 13.60 18.30 314' Meter 15.05 20.30 t' Meter 18.65 26.75 1 112' Meter 23,05 30.85 2' Meter Volume Charge/1000 Gallons (Interruptible) 2.20 2.35 0 2,35 Volume Charge11000 Gallons (Non.-Interruptible) 20. 660 1.00 Sprinkler Charge Per 100 Square Feet Adopt A Spot WGA 8,80 0.00 314' Mater (Billable 3 times annually) 10.50 0.00 1' Meter 15.00 0.00 1 1 Meter 16.76 0.00 2' Meter Volume Chargel1000 Gallons 2.60 0.00 I Government Raw Water -_WGU 14200 14200 Facllity Charge 1.40 1.40 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons Metered H Brent -_WFH 30.00 27.50 Facility Charge 2 65 2,50 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 650.00 650.00 Deposit 50,00 45.50 Installation Charge EXCERPT , PUBLIC UTILITY BOARD MINUTES September 9, 1992 9. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF PROPOSED WATER RATES. Martin reviewed these rates, advising that the study recommends a 5.98 across-the-board increase. This results in the following rate increases: Residential, 6.118, Commercial, 6.098; Government, 9.958; Corinth, 0.768; and LCMUA, 2.588. enc There is help in a the tcityrate beautificat ont eff rts.cagIn residents to o help addition, a "Local Government Irrigation Rate" basedeVOnopan at a reduced cost of $2.20/1000 gallons interruptible service. Motion: Cople-ti made a motion to accept the water rate increase a recommend. Second by Giese. Discussion:. None Vote: All ayes, no nays, motion carried. 1 i UA)RM E.0 ORDINANCE No' FOR WATER SERVICE THE SCxEDULF OF RATE SELETING THE SOxFDULE; INTRA` EWER RATE E AN ORDINANCE AMENDING NOT CONNECTED TO S FFECTIVE ADDING A NEW ADOPT-A-SPOT SERVICE RATE AND PROVIDING FOR AN ~ CLAUSE; GOVERNMENTAL SEVERABILITY PROVIDING A PATE. fiEREBY ORDAINS for water service THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON amendedlto the Rate Schedules Ordinances, Codc. SECTION I. That the vided for in chapter 26 of read as fOllo4ls: WATER RATE SCHEDULES PAGE • 2 n WR Residential Water Service NOt Connected to Sewer Rate WRN Residential Water Service 6 WC commercial/Industrial Water Service Not a WCN Commercial/Industrial Water connect"-d to sewer 10 Local Government Sprinkler Irrigation Rate orations, WGi s to Municipal Corp WW1 Water Sale for ts.& Other Governmental Entities 12 Water Districts & By Agreements Prior to dune If 1986 ale to Municipal Corporations, WW2 Water Sales for Rw Water Districts & Other Governmental Entities 13 Tune It 1g86 74 By Agreements After antra-Governmental Sales of Finished Water t a Spot 16 WG 1~1 L,ocal-Governmental Water SfrUn~reatedAWater 19 WGA WGU Intra-Governmental Sales ant 20 WFH R Metered Water. from Fire xydr service ater WRE Extra-Jurisdictional Residential Windust)'ial W WCE Extra-jurisdictional Commercial & 22 Water service 26 Water Tap and Loop Rider 'ties special Facile a WATRATE.0 Jr, ~l, _j1_1 ORDINANCE NO. _ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SCHEDULE OF' RATES FOR WATER SERVICE ADDING A NEW ADOPT-A-SPOT RATE SCHEDULE; DELETING THE INTRA- GOVERNMENTAL WATER SERVICE NOT CONNECTED TO SEWER RATE SCHEDULE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the Rate Schedules for water service as pro- vided for in Chapter 26 of the Code of Ordinances, are amended to R read as follows: r WATER RATE SCHEDULES PAGE WR Residential Water Service 2 WRN Residential Water Service Not Connected to Sewer 4 WC Commercial/Industrial Water. Service Rate 6 WCN Commercial/Industrial Water Service Not Connected to Sewer 8 WGI Local Government Sprinkler Irrigation Rate 10 WW1 Water Sale for Resale to Municipal Corporations, Water Districts & Other Governmental Entities By Agreements Prior to June 1, 1986 1.2 WW2 Water Sales for Resale to Municipal Corporations, Water Distracts & other Governmental Entities By Agreements After June 1, 1986 1.3 WG Intra-Governmental Sales of Finished Water 14 WGA Local-Governmental Water Service for Adopt a Spot 1G WGU Intra-Governmental Sales of Untreated Water 17 WFH Metered Water from Fire Hydrant 19 WRE Extra-Jurisdictional Residential. Water Service 20 WCE Extra-Jurisdictional Commercial & Industrial Water service 22 Water Tap and Loop 24 Special Facilities Rider 26 r ~I i SCHEDULE WR RESIDENTIAL LIATER SERVICE [Effective 10/7/921 pA pLICATION Applicable for single family residentiai service, and individually metered apartments or mobile hopes or multi-family facilities with less than 4 units. Not applicable to resale, temporary, standby, or supplementary service except in conjunction with applicable rider. NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Facility Charge Billin Per 30 Uay_s ' a.ao 3/4" Meter $ $10.50 1" Meter $1000 1-1/2" Meter $15..75 2" Meter (2) Volume Charge Rate Per 1.000 Gallons WINTER SUMMER Billing months of Billing months of NOV through APRIL MAY through OCT 0-15,000 gals $2.40 $2.40 $3.35 15,000-30,000 gals $2.40 $4.20 Over 30,000 gals $2.40 MINIMUM.pIT,LING: Facility Charge PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIE( All services which require special facilities in order to meet custom- er's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special r facilities rider. PAGE 2 / I iLL+ 7 PRORATION OF UTILITY HILIS (a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill- ings annually. Formula: Actual da s .in reaiinczeriod x customer charge 30 days (b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per month to determine the million gallon consumption to be charged to each rate block. Formula: Actual days in readina_ period x CAI, in rate block x RATE 30 days per 11000 gallons in rate block 1 III PAGE 3 SCHEDULE WRN RESIDENTIAL WATER SERVICE NOT CONNECTED TO SEWER (Effective 10/7/92] APPLICATION Applicable for single family residential service, and individually r+ metered apartments or mobile homes or multi-family facilities with less than 4 units, where the metered water is not returned to the wastewater system for collection and treatment; i.e., lawn sprinkler f or septic system. 11 I Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to temporary, standby, or supplemerrt~ary service except in conjunction with appli- cable rider. NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Facility Charge Billing Pe130 Days 3/4" Meter $ 8.80 1" Meter $10.50 1-1/2" Meter $15.00 2" Meter $16.75 (2) Volumo Charge Rate Per _1-,_0 0 Gallons WINTER SUMMER Billing months of Billing months of NOV through APRIL MAY through OCT 0-15,000 gals $2.40 $2.40 15,000-301000 gals $2.40 $3.35 Over 30,000 gals $2.40 $4.20 MINIMUM BILLING: Facility Charge PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past duct if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. PAGE 4 T /'I 1 Sp_C?nI, FACILITIdS order to meet custom ities ided lsubject to the special special facYOV All services which require s erls service requirements shall be p facilities rider. p2,, APIO_ N OF UT1LI--nY nII,LS for the Fac be based on 12 bill ility charge shall (a) Billing (a) annually. Formula: s in re adin_g___period x customer charge Actual day 30 days i on 30 days per y Billing for the water oused n a~lonl be base( (b) consumpt on to be charged the million g month o aach rate determine blG1c, Formula s in readin pe~ rl°a x GAL in ratblock ingra _ rate Arti~al clay.-- per 1,000 gallons 30 days block t .ISUS' i I I it I PAGE 5 C' SCHEDULE WC COM~IE`,RCIAT_-INDUSTRIAL WA'rE-LI SERV?C6 RATF [Effective to/7/921 APPLICATION Applicable to all commercial and industrial users, or other water pr_ users For not otherwise cl ss delivery ied aunder nd m this sured d hrough one meterWater provided at one point applicable to resale service in any event, nor to temporary' stand- Not. epp service except in conjunction with apk3 licable by, or supplementary rider. NETM- CNTHLY RAPE (1) Facility Charge BilLing Per 30 3/4" Meter 18.45 ~ 2.0.28 1" Meter 1-1/21+ Meter $ 2" Meter $ 23.50 $ 2288..85 60.00 311 Meter $110.00 4" Meter $140.00 6" Meter. $165.00 8" Meter (2) Volume Charge $2.65 per 3.000 gallons MINIMUM BILLING: Facility Charge PAYMENT aid within 15 Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not p calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL_FACILi'PIE;S All services which require special facd in order to meet subject to the spec0al er's service requirements shall he provided facilities rider. PAGr 6 pp- ~yy 9 I _l -oo__ - 20` J UTILITY 4I7r be based on 12 bill- ,R RATI_ O"-OF-~ charge shall (a) Billing for the Facility ings annually. Formula, od x customer charge e din eri days .a:-g- ctual 30 days per. l' 30 daYs sed shall be based on ed to each u for the ~gater on consumption to be oharg (b) gillingormine the gall month to det- rate block. eriod x in rate block x RATE Formula: r in readin - peLr 1,000 gallons in rate pctua7. da 30 days block PAGE 1 POor~la PJO.._.~a J PRORATION OF U'PILITX_BILLS (a) Billing for the. Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill- ings annually. Formula: Actual days in readj.n _ eriod x customer charge 30 days (b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per month to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to each rate block. Formula: Actual days in_,readin-g er.iod x GAL in rate block x RATE 30 days per 1,000 gallons in rate block I PAGE '1 ~ F SCHEDULE WCN COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL WATER SERVICE NOT CONNECTED TO 5ES4ER (Effective 10/7/92] APPLICATION Applicable to all. commercial and industrial users, or other water users not otherwise classified under this ordinance. For all water provided at one point of delivery and measured through one meter where the metered water is not returned to the wastewater system for r collection and treatment; i.e., water used in production or irriga- tion or where wastewater flow is measured separately. Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to temporary, standby, or supplementary service except in conjunction with appli- cable rider. NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Facility Charge Bill.in Fier 30 Des 3/4" Meter $ 18.45 1" Meter $ 20.25 1-1/2" Meter. $ 23.50 2" Meter $ 28.85 3" Meter $ 60.00 4" Meter $110.00 6" Meter $140.00 8" Meter $165.00 (2) Volume Charge $2.65 per 1,000 gallons MINIMUM BILLING: Facility Charge PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of .issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PAGE 2 Ir ..J PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill- iangs annually. Formula: Actua] da s in xeadin eriod x customer. charge 3o days s Per d shall be ba5ed on 3o Billing for the water all nsconsumption to be charged to each (b) month to determine the g rate block. r` Formula: erg x GAL in rate block x RATE per Il Ooo gallons in rate Ac__ tUal days in read ng,__ 30 days block I I 1 PAGE 9 1figr,c!a 11 SCHEDULE WGI LOCAL GOVERNMENT SPRINKLER IRRIGATION RATE (Effective 10/7/92] APPLICATION Applicable to sales of finished water for irrigation purposes to all local accounts supplied at one point of delivery and measured through one meter. Wate will. be provided on a non-interruptible basis or on an as available basis, interruptible as needed to meet peak requirements. /j Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to temporary, stand- by, or supplementary service except in conjunction with applicable rider. NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Facility Charge Billing Per 30 Da s (A) Meter Chag e 3/4" Meter $13.60 1" Meter $15.05 1-1/2" Meter $18.65 2" Meter $23.65 (2) volume Charge Interruptible $2,20 per 1,000 gallons Non-interruptible $2.60 per 1,000 gallons MINIMUM BILLING: Facility Charge PAYMENT Sills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILrrILS All services which require special facilities in order to meet custom- er's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PAGE 10 1 ~~p • t 1 •\I PRORATION OF UTILITY E3ILLS (a) Billings for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual d.a~s in reading Period x Facility Charge 30 (b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per month to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to each rate block. I Formula: +i Actual des in reading erio x oGAL ver11,000egablock 11onsxinArate 30 block. I PAGE 11 SCHEDULE WWI WATER SALE FOR RESALE To MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS, WATER DISTRICTS, AND OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIEY AGREEMENT EFFECTI _ S B VE PRTA IO JUNE 1 1986, {I [Effective 10-7-92] Pis APPLICATION Applicable to all water sales contracts with water districts, or governmental entitiesmademunicipal corporations, for the purpose of providing water for resale to the prior to June 1, Not applicable for temporary public 1986,' in conjunction with applicale ri airy' or supplementary service except MON-- THY CHARGES (1) Facility Charge r y15.5.00 (2) Volume Rate $ 0.95 per 1,000 gallons ~3) Demand Rate 233_04 ber000 aa].lons *ANNUAL C}fARGE 12. (4) Readiness to Serve Rate $ 0.4862 per 1,000 gallons *As determined in the last month of each Contractual Water Year, The e annual charge, ing for if any, shall the next Jul bte ncluded on the trhich it is char ed Y Following hi end of the monthly b.ill- dance with the monthland shall be billed and be Water Year for. Y billing provided for below yable in accor- PAYMENT Denton shall render bills on the tenth (10th) day of each month, shall be due and payable %Ihen rendered. guent if not POW by the ti-rentY- bills are considered deDlins shall be a five percent 5 fifth (25th) day of the whichever, is less or five hundred dollar month. There (25th) of the mont}Ytdded to the bill if not Paid by the charge, Y the twenty-fifth PAGE 12 \I SCHEDULE WWI WATER SALE FOR RESALE TO MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS, WATER DISTRICTS, AND OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES BY AGREEMENT EFFECTIVE PRIOR TO JUNE 14 1986 ~ (Effective 10-7-92] APPLICATION Applicable to all water sales contracts with municipal corporations, water districts, or governmental entities made prior to June 1, 1986, for the purpose of providing water for resale to the public. Not applicable for temporary, standby, or supplementary service except in conjunction with applicable rider. MONTHLY CHARGES (1) Facility Charge $155.00 (2) Volume Rate $ 0.95 per 1,000 gallons (3) Demand Rate er 1,000 gallons 12 *ANNUAL CHARGE (4) Readiness to Serve Rate $ 0.4862 per 1,000 gallons *As determined in the last month of each Contractual Water Year. The annual charge, if any, shall be included on the monthly bill- ing for the next July following the end of the Water Year for *e w'..ich it is charged, and shall be billed and be payable in accor- dance with the monthly billing provided for below. PAYMENT Denton shall render hills on the tenth (10th) day of each month. Bills shall be due and payable when rendered. Bills are considered delin- quent if not paid by the twenty-fifth (25th) day of the month. There shall be a five percent (5%) or five hundred dollar ($500.00) charge, whichever is less, added to the bill. if not paid by the twenty-fifth (25th) of the month. PAGE 12 7 SCHEDULE WW2 WATER SALES FOR RESALE TO MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS, WATER DISTRICTS, AND OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES BY AGREEMENT, AFTER JUNE 1, 1986 (Effective ].0/07/92] APPLICATION Applicable to all water sales contracts with municipal corporations, water districts, or governmental entities made on or after June 1, 1986, for the purpose of providing water for resale to the public. Not applicable for temporary, standby, or supplementary service except in conjunction with applicable rider. MONTHLY CHARGES (1) Facility Charge $170.00 (2) Volume Rate $ 0.95 per 1,000 gallons (3) Demand Rate $328.08_per 1.000 gallons 12 *ANNUAD CHARGE (4) Readiness to Serve Rate $ 0.4862 per 1,000 gallons *As deteriA ned in the last month of each Contractual Water Year. The annual charge, if any, shall. be included on the monthly bill- ing for the next July following the end of the Water Year for which it `s charged, and shall be billed and be payable in accor- dance with the monthly billing provided for below. PAYMENT Denton shall render bills on the tenth (10th) day of each month. Bills shall be due and payable when rendered. Bills are considered delin- quent if not paid by the twenty-fifth (25th) day of the month. There shall be a five percent (5%) or five hundred dollar ($500.00) charge, whichever is less, added to the bill if not paid by the twenty-fifth (25th) of the month. If not paid by the last day of the month, there shall be an additional interest charged on the unpaid balance, equal to the auction average rate quoted on a bank discount basis for a twenty- six (26) week treasury bill issued by the United States governmont, as published by the Federal Reserve, for the week prior to the date such bill or bills are delinquent, or ten percent (100), whichever is less. PAGE 13 SCHEDULE WG INTRA-GOVERNMENTAL SALES OF FINISTI_ED WATER [Effective 10/7/921 APPLICATION i Applicable to sales of finished water to all Cite of Denton Departments and accounts supplied at one point of delivery and measured through one A meter.. Not applicable to resale service in ally event, nor to temporary, stand- by, or supplementary service except in conjunction with applicable rider. ET MONTHLY RATE (1) Facility Charge Billing Per_30 Dav 3/4" Pieter $ 13.60 1" Meter $ 15.05 1-1/2" Dieter $ 18.65 2" Meter. $ 23.65 3" Meter $ 52.75 4" Meter $ 92.65 6" Meter $116.65 8" Meter $136.25 1-,u (2) Volume Charge $2.60 per 1,000 gallons MINIMUM BLLLINGt Facility Charge PAYMENT Hills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet custom- er's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS (a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 bill- ings annually. PAGE 14 1 9 7 Forn.ul.a: A tual days in readin period x facility charge rJ`_ 30 days (b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per month to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to each rate block. Formula% Actual des in. reading-p! ri.od x pGAL i er 1no00tgallonk ingrate 30 days block II PAGE 15 SCHEDULE WGA LOCAL GOVERNMENT W&TER SERVICE FOR "ADOR_ A SPOT" (Effective 10/7/92] I APPLICATION Applicable to sales of finished water to all local government ac- counts supplied at one point of delivery and measured through one 3/4 inch meter with a quick coupler and hose bib for the Keep Denton Beautiful Board's Adopt-A-Spot program. J Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to temporary, 1 standby, or supplementary service except in conjunction with appli- cable rider. NET ANNUAL RATE (1) Facility Charge Per Pil_].ing 3/4" Meter $ 8.80 (2) Volume Charge x,60 per 1000 Gallons 14INIMUM BILLING: Facility Charge ?AYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 1.5 calendar days from date of issuance, SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet custom- er's service requirements shall. be provided subject to the special facilities rider. FACILITY CFIARGE (a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 3 billings annually in the months of October, April and July. (b) Billing for the water used shall be based on the gallons consumed. PAGE 16 SCHEDULE waU TNTRA GOVI_I?NMENTAL SALES OF UNTREA`iF_U WF~TER [Effective 1.0/7/92) APPLICATION Applicable to all City of Denton Departments and accounts for untreated y~ water supplied at one point of delivery and measured through one meter. r Not applicable for resale except in conjunction with applicable rider. I NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Facility Charge $142.00 per 30 days (2) Volume Charge $ 1.40 per. 1,000 gallons MINIMUM BILLING Facility Charge PAYMENT' I Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 l calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILI'fIFS All services which require special facilities in order to meet custom- er's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF_UTIFLT'Y BILLS (a) Billing for the Facility charge shall. be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual ds__in reading period x customer charge 30 days (b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per month to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to each rat.-. block. PAGE 17 I !gym da h? Arc d:+;laiz _-._-904 - - Formula: Actual. days in reading_neriod x GAL in rate block x RATE 30 days per. 1,000 gallons in rate block t PAGE 18 . it 1 SCHEDULE WF'H METEREn SVI~TER FROM FIRE HYDRANT (Effective 10/7/92] APPLICATION Applicable for all water taken through a fire hydrant or other di- rect distribution lin.:source at one location for private or commer- cial use not associated with fire fighting. _ DEPOSIT $650.00 User shall places a deposit for each use of each of the City's hy- drant meter(s) needed. Deposit to be returned when meter is re- turned and final bill is paid. NET RATE Volume Charge; $ 2.60 per 1,000 gallon,3 Volume use shall be computed by subtracting the meter reading at time of customer paying deposit and receiving meter from meter reading upon return of meter times any applicable multiplier. FACILITY CHARGE $ 30.00 per 30 days INSTALLATION CHARGE $ 50.00 per meter per installation PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past Jue if not paid within 15 calendar days fror date of issuance. PAGE 19 a INI Ho. 9A e. A;~ I ra._. _ SCHEDULE WRE G I EXTRA-JURISDICTIONAL RESIDENTIAL WATER SERVICE [Effective 10/7/921 APPLICATION r Applicable for single family residential service, and individually metered apartments or mobile homes or multi-family facilities with less than 4 units outside the corporate limits of the city of Denton. NET MONTHLY RA'T'E (1) Facility Charge Billing Per_~0 Days 3/4" Meter $11.15 1" Meter $12,25 1-1/2" Meter $16.'70 2" Meter $20.00 (2) Volume Charge Rate_Per 7.,000 Gallons WINTER SUMMER Billing months of Billing months of NOV through APRIL MAY through OCT 0-150000 gals $2.95 $2.95 150000-30,000 gals $2.95 $4.00 Over 30,000 gals $2.95 $5.00 MINIMUM BILLING: Facility Charge PAYMFNT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due xi' not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PAGE 20 9 ~J I PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS (a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actuall da s_in reading_erioq._ x customer charge 30 days (b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per month to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to w each rate block. Formula: j 1 Actual des in reading_p riod x GAL in rate block x RATE 3( days per 1,000 gallons in rate block I I PAGE 21 I V G SCHEDULE WCE EXTRA-JURISDICTIONAL COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL SVATER SERVICE [Effective 10/7/921 APPLICATION Applicable for all commercial and industrial users or other users not otherwise classified under this ordinance outside of the cor- porate limits of the City of Denton for all water service provided at one point of delivery and measured through one meter. Not applicable to temporary, standby or supplementary service, except in conjunction with applicable rider. NET MONTHLY RAT, (1) Facility Charge I3i11_inci_Per. 30 Da s 3/411 Meter $ 18.55 I" Meter $ 20.50 1-1/211 Meter $ 25.95 211 Meter $ 29.50 311 Meter $ 87.90 411 Meter $147.40 611 Meter $188.90 81, Meter $214.05 (2) volume Charge $3.15 per 1,000 gallons MINIMUM BILLING: Facility Charge PAYMENT Bills are due vhen rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES Al). services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF UTILITY [3ILI_.S (a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. PAGE 22 1 a ~A Formula: Actual davs in reading period x customer charge 30 days (b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per month to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to each rate block. Formula: Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE 30 days per 1,000 gallons in rate block I PAGE 23 1 ~yy 7 d rhtir.nrfa PJo. _.7r~' 4•.~c~____,-- r WATER TAP AP-Ti-M-1-ME-0- (Effective 10/07/92) ' APPLI ATT N This schedule applies to the installation, removal, or Util relocation of water taps and loops by the City of aDento at on for department at the request of a person, corporation. { TAP AND LOOP FES Any person, association of persons, or corporation that requests that a water main tap, water meter loop, be removed, installed, or relocated by the utility department shall pay in advance to the Utility department the following applicable fees: WATET TAPS WITH LOOP @ize of Tam and Meter Paved Sree_t p_n~qved Street 3/4 inch $ 785.00 $ 400.00 835.00 $ 435.00 1-1/2 inch $ 1060.00 $ 700.00 2 inch $ 1185.00 $ 785.00 WATER T&P° WITHOUT LOOP, r~+ nd Meter Paved Street Unuaved Street Size of ..t. • 2 inch $ 810.00 $ 400.00 WATER LOOPS Size of Loop 3/4 inch $ 235.00 1 inch $ 275.00 1-1/2 inch $ 400.00 METER RELOCATIONS Size of Tan and Meter RelocatiQn- of 10 Fee or Less 3/4 inch $ 50.00 3. inch $ 75.00 1-1/2 inch $ 75.00 2 inch $ 100.00 PAGE 24 ~uR Ar~~l1~J_t ljf~l__.~eJ_---------•- FEES FOR, INSTALLATIONS NOT LISTED For installation of a tap or loop for which a fee is not specified, the requestor shall pay in advance a deposit based upon the estimated cost of such installation, or similar work, plus an administration charge of 20*. Upon completion of the installation or similar work requested , the applicant shall be billed at actual cost, as determined by the Utility department, plus a 20% administrative charge. Any excess deposit shall be refunded to the applicant. The ins,A.C.ation charges may be waived by the Utility department for a request to install taps exclusively dedicater., to fire sprinkler systems. i f PAGE 25 1 / h 4)0111,1 No. • w .~3 J~ SPF,~___=IAL FACSL2TIS RIDF.F2 (1) All service shall be offered from available facilities. If a customer service characteristic require facilities and devices which are nut normally and readily available at the location at shall provide whichsethrve `~subject requests paragraph 2 of thisschedule. the (2) The total cost of all facilities required to meet the cus- tomer's load characteristics which are incurred by the Utility shall s be subject to a special contract entered into between the Utility r and the customer. This contract shall be signed by both parties prior to the Utility providi,i, service to the customer. I I I PACE 26 D ~ 4VI , sen- araclrapit + tion, P application section, subse r+r C t- court if any this ordinance } d by any alid- in Sc TI_Ox TI,}zra}set or. word ~tanees i.s heldot a!.£eandt the City ci.rcum~ha],ding shall n ha~,e erson such 0-- or.dinanCe it vrou].d renoe, claus an e, ox f~af to y P , f this decla they. ~~nt 7urisdicoioti)onions s hereby invai.i.ditY' such of com})ehe remaininc3 Denton, Texa it, any S its of prtions deli' ein adopted tion Counci.1. of th remaining p ates her ooump such schedule of R" a]1 water. enacted li e That the ed to -13 th ~~ifTON_ -Charc3ed and 199? ' be effects-e+ October 7+ - 1992' r oc,,,riny pY after day of _ _ - Y,ASSF;U Al1U APPROVED this _ Mn J 1 1308 CA5'PLEBF;RRY, ATTE5`P : r.i,Py ARY 3RKNIFER WALTFR,~, - I'0 L'('AL "01} t4 A`I„Pp}2F1EY URAYGVT`i'CF}+ C}'PY APPROV4UAMI DEBRA I I PAGE 2! `may i l I I` Sr_C`'ION II. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sen- tence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstances is hold invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the valid- ity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION._IlI. That the Schedule of Rates herein adopted shill be effective, charged and applied to the all water consumption occurin or after October 7, 1992. rf PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1992, -BOB CMFiLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVI'T'CII, CITY A'T'TORNEY BY: PAGE 27 T - ,--JIM ICITY-11- T-M COUNCIL - m T - - i - TTT, ♦ - . oa~aaa v - 0 or o 0 d~a~OtiroN °~nnannnr, i -r i I t 3 02 D3 C~ ~iepberobeY 29 r 1992 CITY COUNCIL WORK Si ~N TOIL MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Manger ' FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Man REt RATEISTUDY REPORTAND PROPOSED WASTEWATER RATES AND GIVE STAFF DIRECTION RECOMMENDATIONS I' The Public Utility Board, at their meotng of ept m posed 1992, recommended to the Cj,ty council approval of the pr legal fiscal year. 1993 Wastewater rate ordinance, pending approval. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: The Board was initially briefed on proposed Wastewater rate changes at the August 27th meeting, One of the major topics discussed was the change in wholesale rate methodology that results in a rate decrease for those customers. The Board also asked the staff to present a residential rate option that included 21000 gallons in the ba6io rate After reviewing the proposed option, the Board subsequently elected to retain the existing rate structure. y The Board subsequently met on September 9th and recommended an overall fiscal year 1993 wastewater rate increase of 14.0%. The rate incse for overall rate eincreasem includesoma customers least Irate decrease, Exhibit I contains a summary of Wastewater rate changes. Exhibit II contains the fiscal year 1993 Wastewater rate study ofdtheoSeptembere 9thiPublic Util.itytBoard meeting. minutes FISCAL SUMMARY: The proposed 14.0% increase n in ratos would provide a cash net gain of approximately PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Citizens of Denton, Wholesale Wastewater. Customers, Denton PublicpUtilities VtIlLties, Ci.tyLCounc.ll E'inance Department, Page 2 Respectfully submitted, Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager. Prepared byt H in, D rector of Environmental Operations/ Financial Administration Exhibitsi I. summary of Wastewater Katie Changes Meeting a of 9/9/92nre II, , Minutes wastewater of PUB Rate II1 ,1I I CITY OF DENTON WASTEWATER UTILITY' ' CURRENT VERSUS PROPOSED RATESI 9-~29 ~z - 3 Rate Schedule -Proposed Curro -Rates Rates Rosldentlal - SR_ Facility Charge 5.00 4.45 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 1.90 1.65 Rosldential_wtthoul_Woler Service - SRN Facility Charge (Inside Clly} 6.00 4.45 Facility Charge (Outside GIN) 6.4 J 6.40 Volume Chargo/1000 Gallons (Inside City) 1.90 1.65 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons (outside City) 2.50 2.50 Residential outside Corporate Limits and with GIN of Denton Water Service - SF1W r' Faclilly Charge 6An 6.40 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 2.50 2.50 Regular Commerclel_- SC Facility Charge 13.00 10.75 Volume Charge/1000 Clallons 2,46 2115 Sampling Charge (As Required) 35.00 30.00 Analyslo Charge (As Required) 15.00 15.00 Surcharge - See Below Commercial Induslrial wlthout_Water Service - SCN Facility Charge (Inside City) 13.00 10.75 Facility Charge (Oulslde Cily) 14.40 14.40 Sampling Charge (As Required) 35,00 30.00 Analysis Charge (As Required) 15.00 16,00 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons (Inside) 2A6 2,16 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons (Outside) 2.85 2.85 I Commercial with Dedicated Water _Motors SCD 3/4' Motor 18.45 17.80 ✓ 1' Motor 20,26 19.60 1 112' Motor 23.60 22,60 2' Motor 28,85 25.15 3' Meter 60.00 71.15 4' Motor 110.00 118.60 6' Meter 140,00 152.60 8' Metal 165.00 172.80 Sampling Charge (As Roqulred) 35,00 30.00 Analysis Charge (As Required) 15,00 16.00 Volume Charge/1000 Gallo,is 2.45 2.15 Surcharge - Soo Below Regular Commercial outside Corporate Limits and with C~of Donlon Water ServiceSCW Facllliy Charg_e 14.40 14.40 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 2.85 2,85 Sampling Charge (As Required) 35.00 30,00 Analysis Charge (As Required) 15.00 16.00 Surcharge - Soo Below I J 1 v 1 r CITY OF DENTON WASTEWATER UTILITY- CURRENT - VERSUS PROPOSED RATES Rate SSchedule Pruposo-d- • Cu rent - Rates Rales Motored Wastewater - SM Faclllty Charge (inside City) 161.00 130.00 Facility Charge (OUIsIdo City) 195.00 196.00 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons (inside) 2.45 2.15 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons (Outside) 2,85 2.85 Sampling Charge 36,00 30,00 Analysis Charge 16.00 16,00 Surcharge - See Below P Metered Wastewater Catestorlost SMA Facility Charge (inside City) 161.00 130.00 Facility Charge (Outside City) 195.00 195,00 Volume ~ barge/1000 Gallons (Inside) 2,46 216 Volume Chargo/1000 Gallons (Outside) 2,85 2.85 Adminlslratfvo/Program Categorical 320.60 260.00 Sampling Charge 36.00 30.00 Analysis Charge 16,00 iG,00 Surcharge - See Below Meterad_Waslewaler Non-Cate~orbal SMt3 Facility Charge (inside City) 161,00 130,00 Facility Charge (Outside City) 196,00 195.00 Volume Chargo/1000 Osillons (inside) 2.46 2.16 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons (Outside) 2.85 2,65 Adminlstrative/Program Non-Categorical 37.00 30,00 Sampling Chargo 36,00 30,00 Y ` Analysis Chargo 15,00 16100 J Surcharge - Soo Below Eating. Places SEP Facility Charge 13.00 11.65 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 3.00 2.65 Sampling Charge (As Requlrod) 35.00 30.00 Analysis Charge (As Required) 16.00 15,00 Surcharge - See Below EquiPment SarvIces - SES Facility Chargo _ 18.00 11,65 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 3.40 2,65 Sampling Charge (As Requlrod) 36,00 30.00 Analysis Charge (As Required) 15.00 15.00 Surcharge - Sao Below government _L__.SG Facility Charge 13,00 11,65 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 2,16 1.85 Surcharge - See Below Induslrkjl Water - SGE Facility Chargo _ 100.00 100.00 Volume Chargo/1000 Gallons 1.10 0,95 Surcharge - See Below CITY OF DENTON WASTEWATER UTILITY CURRENT VERSUS PROPOSED RATES. Rale In edul3 Nroposed rrenl Rates Rates Wholesale - SSC 76,00 125,00 Facillty Charge 1 85 210 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons Surcharge - See Below Surchage Bloohemloal Oxygen Demand - BOD 0.00183 0.00159 Total Suspended Solids - TSS 0,00227 0.00197 • J~ 1 I r 1 CITY OF DENTON WASTEWATER TI LIT ~ - J CURRENT VERSUS PROPOSED R TES At-a- Schedule Proposed Current - - -Rates - Rates Residentlal -SR facility Chargo 5.00 4.4 6 Volume Chargo/1000 Gallons 1.90 1.65 Resfdentlaf wllhout Water S©rvico - SRN Facility Churge (inside Cfty) 5.00 4.45 Fevillty Charge (Outside Cfty) 6.40 6.40 Volume Chargo/1000 Gallons (Inside City) 1,90 1,65 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons (Outside Clly) 2,50 2.50 Resldenllai outside Corporate Limits and with Ci ol_Denton Water Servica Pf!W Faulty Charge 6.40 6.40 Volume Chargo/1000 Gallons 2.50 2.50 FIRLL{tar Commercial -__SC Facility Charge 13.00 10.76 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 2.46 2.15 Sampling Charge (As Required) 35.00 30.00 Analysis Charge (As Requlrod) 15.00 15.00 Surchargo - See Below Co_mmorclaNlndustrial withoul Water Service - SCN Facility Charge (Insldo Clly) 13,00 4.45 Faclllty Charge (OutSldo City) 13.00 6.40 Sampling Charge (As Required) 35,00 30,00 Analysis Charge (As Raqulred) 16,00 +5.00 Volume Chargo/1000 Gallons (Inside) 2.45 1.66 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons (Outside) 2,85 2,50 Commercial will) Uodl_caled- Water Motors__. SCI7 3%4' Meter 18.46 17.80 1' Motor 20,25 19,60 i 1/2' Meter 23,60 22.60 2' Motor 28,86 25.16 3' Mote; 60.00 71.15 4' Motor 110.00 118.60 6' Motor 140.00 162,50 8' Motor 165.00 172,80 Sampling Charge (As Requlrod) 35.00 x0,00 Analysis Charge (As Hequlred) 15.00 15,00 Volume Charge/1000 tlallons 2,45 215 Surcharge - See Below Regular Commerclal outside Corporate I.1mlls !11-10-vi lth CI of DBnlOn Water SeMco - SCW Facility Charge 14.40 14.40 Volumo Charge/1000 Gallons 2.85 2,85 Somplfng Chargo (As Required) 35,00 30,00 Analysis Charge (As Required) 15,00 15.00 Surcharge - See Below 4t . 1 CITY OF DENTON WASTEWATER UTILITY W CURRENT VERSUS PROPOSED RATES % ~9- Rate Schedulo Proposed C ont Wes Rates Pretreatment,- SPT_(SPA or 41% Facllity Charge 13.00 10.75 Volume Charge/11000 Gallons 2.45 2.15 AdminlstrntivolProgram Categorical (SPA) 320.60 260.00 AdmiolstrativelProgram Non-Categorloal (SPB) 37.00 30.00 Sampling Charge 35.00 30.00 Analysis Charge 15.00 16.00 Surchnrge - See Below Metered Wastewater -n--q4 Facility Charge (Inside City) 161.00 130,00 Facility Charge (Outslcle City) 195.00 195,00 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons (Inside) 2.45 2.15 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons (Outside) 2.85 2.86 Sampling Charge 35.00 30.00 Analysis Charge 16.00 16.00 Surcharge - See Below Metered wastewaler CAtogorlcal - SMA Facility Charge (Inside City) 161.00 130.00 Facility Charge (Outside City) 196.00 195.00 Volume Charge/11000 Gallons (Inslde) 2.46 2.16 Volume ChargeM000 Gallons (Outside) 2.86 2.85 AdmInlslrativelProgram Categodcal 320.50 260.00 Sampling Charge 35.00 30.00 Analysis Charge 15,00 15.00 Surcharge - Soo Below Metered Wastewater Non-_U9921__3Mk3 Facility Chargo (Inslde City) 161.00 130.00 Facility Charge (Oulslde City) 195.00 196.00 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons (Inside) 2.46 215 Volume Chargollo00 Gallons (Outsldo) 2,86 2.86 AdminislrativeMrogram Non-Calogorloal 37.00 30,00 Sampling Charge 36.00 30.00 Analysts Charge 15.00 15,00 Surcharge - Soo Below Ealing_Places=SEP Facility Chargo 13.00 11,65 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 3.40 2.06 Sampling Charge (As Roqulred) 35.00 30,00 Analysis Charge (As Roqulred) 15.00 15.00 Surcharge - See Bolow E-crulpmenl Soryicea; - SITS-Facility Chargo 13.00 11.65 Volume Chargo11000 3allons 3.40 2.85 Sampling Charge (As Required) 36.00 30.00 Analysis Charge (As Required) 16.00 15.00 r Surcharge Bee Below I I 7 CITY OF DENTON WASTEWATER UTILITY CURRENT VERSUS PROPOSED RATES Rate Schedule Proposed Current Rates Ralos Government - SG Pacillty Charge 13.00 11.65 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 2.15 1.65 Surcharge - See Below Indusidal Water=- SGE Facility Charge 100,00 100.00 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 1.10 0195 Surcharge - See Below Wholesale SSG Facility Charge 75.00 126.00 Volume Chargol1000 Gallons 1.66 2.10 Surcharge - Soo Below Surchar o Biochemical Oxygen Demand - 601) 0.00163 0.00169 Total Suspended Solids - TSS 0.00227 0.00197 I EXCERPT / PUBLIC UTILITY BOARD MINUTES September 91 1992 10. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF PROPOSED WASTEWATER RATES: Martin noted that Board asked staff to hold the wastewater rate increase to 10% this year and no more than 15% next year.. This was the driving force that behind the recognition that, when looking at t;ie projected balance sheet, such a rate structure would require a $400,000 to $500,000 cut, the release of five to six full time employees and throw to four temporary employees, Nelson noted that staff presented to this information to the City Council, and Council then looked at a 12.5% increase, However, upon further review, it was noted that the difference between a 12.5% increase and a 15% increase amounted to 50(~ per customer, Therefure, Council has directed staff to bring back to the Board a recommendation for a 15% increase for this year. Martln advised the hoard that what was distributed in the Agendii packet was all based on a 10% increase) he directed the Board's attention to the handouts distributed prior to the meeting which are based on a proposed 15% increase as directed by the i2ouncil. Based on an overall rate increase as proposed, Martin reviewed with the Board the following customer class rate increases: 14.818 for Residential) 15,60%, Commercial) 18,34%, Eating Places) 18,75%, Equipment Services) 15.69%, Gover.nmentl and a decrease in Wholesale of 12,4$, Motion: Following substantial discussion, Coplen recommended to the City Council acceptance of the proposed rate structure. Second by Clark, Votei All ayes, no nays. Motion Carried. jej, 3 y - ink ORDINANCE NO. - / AY ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SCHEDULE OF RATES FOR WASTEWATER SERVICE; ADDING A NEW COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER SERVICE TO USERS WITHOUT CITY OF DENTON WATER SERVICE (SCN), RESIDENTIAL WASTEWATER SERVICE TO USERS OUTSIDE OF DENTON CORPORATE LIMITS WITH CITY OF DENTON WATER SERVICE (SRW), AND COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER SERVICE OUTSIDE THE CITY OF DENTON CORPORATE LIMITS WITH CITY OF DENTON WATER SERVICE (SCW) RATE SCHEDULES; DELETING THE RESIDENTIAL WASTE NTON CORPORATE (SRW)WATER FORFAN EEFFECT VE DATE LIMITS RATE SCHEDULES; O AND PROVIDING USERS THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DE14TON HEREBY ORDAINS: ECT ON I. That the Rate Schedules for wastewater service as provided for in chapter 26 of the Code of Ordinances, are amended to read as follows: WASTEWATER RATE SCHEDULES PAGE 3 SR Residential Wastewater Service 5 SC Regular Commercial Industrial Wastewater Service 7 SEP Restaurants & Food Service Wastewater Service 10 SES Equipment Services Wastewater Service SPT Commercial/Industrial Pretreatment Wastewater Services 13 I SCD Commercial/Industrial Wastewater Service with 15 Dedicated Water Meters S5c WhGolesale Division or Subdivision is 20 so Intragovernmental Wastewater Service SGE Sale of Treated Wastewater Effluent to Municipal 22 Utility Customers SM Metered Wastewater Inside/outside Corporate Limits 24 SRW Residential Wastewater Service to Users Outside Denton 26 of Water service { ill SRN Residential Wastewater Service to Users without City of Denton Water Service 2 a SCN Commercial/Industrial Wastewater service to Users without City of Denton Water service 30 SCW Commercial/industrial Wastewater Service outside the City of Denton Corporate Limits with City of Denton 32 Water Service Wastewater Tap Fees 34 Special Facilities Rider 36 ,R f 1 ~I I PAGE 2 ~✓1"~'tlz tJo- 9~ _4.~1J SCHEDULE SR RESIDENTIAL WASTEWATER SERVICE [Effective 10/7/92] PPLIGATION Applicable for single family residential service, and individually less apartments or mobile homes or multi-family facilities with than four (4) units. k[ot applicable for sub-billing or other utility billing by service " user in any event. NET MONTHL_ Y RATS (1) Facility Charge $5.00/30 days (2) Volume Charge $1.90/1,000 gallon effluent Monthly billings shall be calculated by using ninety-eight percent (98%) of water consumption for the month as determined herein, up to a maximum of thirty thousand of December through Februar (30,000) gallons. For the months used. For the months of March t~through e Nov mb rptithesaverage monthly rate of water consumption for the preceding months of December through February shall be used. If the customer did not have water service for those prior months, the actual water consumption for the months March through November or 10,000 gallons, whichever is less, shall be used. MINIM B:f.L- LING Facility Charge $5.00/30 days PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SP ECIk FACII,ITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PAGE 3 PRQRATION OF FACILITY CHARGg Billing for the Facility Charge shall be based on 12 billings annually, Formula: cctua], days in reading perioA x customer charge 30 days VOLUME CHARGE Billing for the wastewater volume shall be based on the wastewater volume calculated during the billing period. Formula: Average water voLYgp .9a _ x Rate per. 10000 gallons iaoo PAGE 4 i i 1 SCHEDULE SC ~*°~e COMMERCIAL ANP INDU5TFjIAL WASTFWATE SRRVTCE 1 1 (Effective 10/7/92) REGULAR COMMERCIAL! APPLIICATION Applicable to all commercial and industrial wastewater service users and to all wastewater service users not otherwise classified under SEP, SES, SPT, SCD, SM or. SCN listed herein. 1, MONTHLY RATE (1) Facility Charge $13.00/30 days (2) Volume Charge $ 2.45/1,000 gallon effluent Billing based on eighty (80%) percent of monthly water consumption. SAMPLINGlANALYSIS CHARGF, (1) Sampling charge (each) $35.00 (2) Analysis charge (per test) $15.00 COMMERCIAL ADD JNDUSTRIAL SURCEi,~$G.F In addition to the above charc,a for commercial and industrial service, there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial. surcharge based on the following formula: Cu=Vu ((Bu-250) B + (SU-250} S)) Wheres Cu is the surcharge for user X. Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X. Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 250 mg/l, whichever is greater. B is the unit cost factor ($0.00183) for treat- ing one unit of BOD per 1,000 gallons. Su is the tested SS level for user X or 250 mg/l, whichever is greater. PAGE 5 4 unit cost factor ($0.00227) for trea,- S iis ng the one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons. MjN MuM BILLING $13.00/30 days pAN YMF_NT aid within gills are due when rendered, and become past due if not p 15 calendar days from date of issuaner.-. SPECIAL-FACI---ILITIES ecial facili ovided e bjectt to the All services which require sp • customer's service requirements shall be p special facilities rider. M 1'R03TON OF FACILITY CEiARGft Billings for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formulas eri x customer charge Actu 1 da s39 days 0Us~_E~ HARGE volume Billing for ho wastewater per.i.od, during thelbi linga the wastewater Formulas gallons r ie X Rate per 1,000 9 v 1; of ~Lf `1000 I PAGE 6 y SCHEDULE SEP RESTAURANTS &(FOOD_ SERVI ~ AST EWATEE SERVICE APPLICATIUN Applicable to all restaurants customers food and are e categorized whby prepare and serve food ich Standard Industrial Cod directly to 5812 or 5B13. NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Facility Charge $13,00/30 days (2) Volume charge § ` 3.40/1,000 gallon effluent p' Billing based on eighty (80%) percent of monthly water consumption. ~ §AM~'LING NA ~Y.SIS C ARG~,H.-' (1) Sampling Charge $ 35,00/each (Z) Analysis Charge 15.00/test f EP EXEMPTIONS (1) Customers under the SEP rate shall be charged the Sc + rate if only pre-wrapped and pre -processed foods are Nerved from their premises and no food processing is performed on the premises so that only minimal organhc material is discharged to the sanitary sewer. exemption for the SEP class shall be determined by the City of Denton Environmental Health Services Food inspection Division. 1 (2) Customers under the SEP able raindustrites bsurcharga ifethe rate plus the applicable ri customer: manhole on the { (a) Installs a wastewater sewer discharge sline; sanitary e (b) Agrees to pay for the City to sample and analyze, quarterlyr the wastewater discharge for the renal lowing: Biochemical Oxygen Demand ( and Grease Suspended Solids ( )r and Fats, oils PAGE 7 3 (FOG), based on the actual costs; and (c) Agrees to pay, based on the industrial surcharge formula, a surcharge on all wastewater discharged that is in excess of 500 mg/1 of BOD and 550 TSS as determined by the monitoring performed in Section 2(b). MINIMUM.-BILLING i $13.00/30 days 1NDUS RIAL SURCHARGE The industrial surcharge calculation that applies to equipment services claiming the SEP exemption shall be based an the following formula: Cu=VU ((BU-500] B + (Su-550] S]) Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X. Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X. Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 500 i mg/1, whichever is greater. B is the unit cost factor ($0,00183) for treat- ing one unit of BOD per 1,000 gallons. Su is the tested SS level for user X or 550 mg/l, whichever is greater. S is the unit cost factor ing one unit of Ss per 1`000 0gallons. treat- AYMED'.T Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of isnuance, PE AL FAQ-1LI3'IES All services which require special facilities in order to meet cuntomer's sorvice requirements shall be provided subject to the special. facilities rider. PAGE 8 1 I P13ORATION OF FACILITY CHARGE Billings for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: ~ctyal days in reading period x customer charge 30 days M UME CHARGE Billing for the wastewater volume shall be based on the wastewater volume calculated during the billing period. Formula: I Water volumx Rate per 1,000 gallons 1000 I PAGE. 9 PRORA'PTON dF FAGITI~TY-- OHARGE Billings for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formulas n..r~,a~ lave in reading per o x customer charge 30 days VOLUME CHARGE Billing for the wastewater volume shall be basediodn the wastewater volume calculated during the billing p Formula: ate v^~ume x .8 x Rate per 1,000 gallons 1000 >nsaa" II PAGE 9 -PIN ' V i SCHEDULE SES I F;OUIPMENT SERVICES WASTEWATER SERVIC__ [Effective 10/7/921 PPLTCATION Applicable to establishments which perform washing, cleaning or servicing of automobiles, trucks, busses or similar equipment and are categorized by Standard Industrial Code Numbers 5541, 7549 or 7542, NET MONTHLY_ RATE (1) Facility Charge $13.00/30 days (2) Volume Charge $ 3,40/1,000 gallon effluent Billing based on eighty (80f) percent of monthly water consumption. ,$,kMPLING/ANALYSIS CHARGE (1) Sampling Charge $ 35.00/each (2) Analysis Charge $ 15.00/test SES EXEMPTIONS Customers under the SES rates shall be charged the SC rate plus the applicable industrial surcharge if the customer; (a) installs a wastewater sampling manhole on the sanitary sewer discharge line; (b) Agrees to pay for the City to sample and analyze, quarterly, the wastewater discharge for the fo7.lowingr 'F Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Total Suspended Solids (TSS), and Fats, oils and Grease (FOG), based on the actual costsr and (c) Agrees to pay, based on the industrial surcharge formula, a surcharge on all wastewater discharged that is in excess of 500 mg/l of BOD and 600 TSS as deter- mined by the monitoring performed in Section 2(b). it PAGE 10 i I 1 ,20 y~ MINIMUM BILLING $13.00/30 days INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE The industrial surcharge calculation that applies to equip- ment services claiming the SES exemption shall be based an the following formula: r Cu=Vu ([B"-500] B + (Su-600) S]) r Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X. Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X. Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 500 mg/l, whichever is greater. B is the unit cost factor ($0.00183) for treat- ing one unit of BOD per 1,000 gallons. Su is the tested SS level for user X or 600 mg/l, whichever is greater. S is the unit cost factor ($0.00227) for treat- ing one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons. PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACYLYTYF~S All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF FACILITY g1LAA Gr; Billings for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: PAGE 11 I 1 i Actual _A4 ,s in reading period x customer charge 30 days VOLUM__ CHARGE Billing for the wastewater volume theelbilling aperi d. the wastewater volume calculatedduring Formula: x Rate per' 1,0()o gallons water yolu10o0 PAGE 12 a G% SCHEDULE SPT COMMERCIAL.E-INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT WASTEWATER SERVICES [Effective 10-7-92] APP^LICAT-ION ubject Applicable to all major to EPA Pretreatment criteria or commercial n other ucommercialtandrindustri- al customers that have the probability of discharging extra stewat which err which are listed on EPA smcategoricals pollutant tlist wastewat- NET MONTHLY CHARGE (1) Facility Charge $ 13.00/30 days (2) Pretreatment/Program Charge a. Categorical $320.50/30 days $ 37.00/30 days b. Noncategorical (3) Volume Charge $2.45/1,000 gallon effluent $0.00183/mg/1 of BOD (4) Surcharge $0.00227/mg/1 of TSS Billing shall be based on 80% of water consumption or 100% actual metered wastewater. SpL G/ANALYSIS CHARGE (1) Sampling charge (each) $35.00 (2) Analysis charge (per test) $15,00 INRUSTRIAL SURCHARGE In addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial, there will. be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge based on the following formula: Cu-Vu ([Bu-250] B + [Su-250] S]) Where: Cu is the surcharge for urger X. Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X. PAGE 13 r 1 I Bu is the tested BOD level for user X oz 2x mg/1, whichever is greater, B is the unit cost factor ($0.00183) for treat- ing one unit of BOD per 1,000 gallons, Su is the tested SS level for user X or 250 mg/11 whichever is greater. S is the unit cost factor ($0.00227) for treat- ing one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons. MINIMUM B LLING $333.50/30 days Categorical $ 50,00/30 days Non-Categorical PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF FACILITY CHARGE & PRETREATMhNTLaIQCRAM CHARGE Billings for the Facility and pretreatment/ program charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: &ctual dq in rea ing_period x customer charge 30 days VOLUME CHARGE Billing for the wastewater volume shall, be based on the wastewater volume calculated during the billing period, Formula: Water volume x .8 x Rate per 1,000 gallons 1000 or W4stewgtex volume, x Rate per 1,000 gallons 1,000 PAGE 14 I I &Y1111,1 NO SCHEDULE ~7[ COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL 137 'LR SERVICE WIT DEDICATED WATLt 'CRS (Effective 10, APPLICATION Applicable to all commercial and industrial wastewater service users and to all wastewater service users not otherwise classified under this ordinance whose wastewater is measured by a mater edicated to water_ which is returned into the wastewater collection and treatment system. Not applicable for sub-hi.lling or other utility billing by service user in any event. I NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Facility Charge Bi lina Per 30 Days 3/4" Meter $ 18.45 I" Meter $ 20.25 1-1/211 Meter $ 23.50 21' Meter. $ 28,85 3" Meter $ 60.00 4" Meter. $110.00 6" Meter $140.00 811 Meter $165.00 (2) Volume Charge $2.45/1,000 gallon effluent g/1 of AOD (3) surcharge 0.00227/$0.00 of 39S $ Billing based on ninety-eight (98%) percent of monthly water flow. S PLEL\ANALYSIS C,UARU (1) Sampling Charge (each) $35.00 (2) Analysis charge (per test) $15.00 INDUEjo L SUE91IARGE 1 In addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial, there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge PAGE 15 `I based on the following formula: Cu=Vu ([Bu-2501 B + [Su-250] SD Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X. ~ Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X. Bu is the tested BOD level for user x or 250 mg/1, whichever is greater.. B is the unit cost factor ($0.00183) for treat- ing one unit of BOD per 1,oOO gallons. Su is the tested ISS level for user X or 250 Mg/l, ~ S is the unit cost factor ($O.o0227) for treat- ing one unit of sS per 1,000 gallons. MINI_ UM.-BILLING $18.45/30 days AYM tJT_ ome Bills are du when from rendered, date nand boc issuance. due if not paid within 15 cal SPECIAU FACT UTIES All serviced which require special facilities i subjr t tomeet customer's service requirements shall be provided special facilities rider. pp OR~I.0 OF FAC•-- ILIU CHA GE Billing for the Faci7.ity charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: ~c 1 days in r_?ddin~_period x customer charge 30 days OL ME Gf3ARE Billing for the wastewater volume shealbll b based o the wastewater volume calculated during PAGE 16 Formula: Water volume x ,98_. x Rate per 1,000 gallons 1000 I I ~ I PAGE 17 T1 7 • ~I R ~ SCHEDULE SSC (Effective 10-7-92) WHOLESALE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SERVICE FOR A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY, DIVISION_OR SUBDIVISION APPLICATION Applicable to any municipal corporation, or other governmental agency or subdivision which operates a wastewater collection system and contracts with the City of Denton for wastewater treatment service. NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Facility Charge $ 75.00/30 days (2) Volume charge $1.85/1,000 gallon of effluent (3) Surcharge $0.00183/mg/l of BOD $0.00227/mg/l of TSS Billing shall be based on one-hundred (100%) percent of actual gallons measured. MINIMUM BILLING $75.00/30 days INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE In addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial, there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge based on the following formula: Cu.=Vu ([BU-250 B + fSU-250) S)) Where: Cu is tho surcharge for user. X. Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X. Bu is the testsu 60D level for user X or 250 mg11, whichever is greater. B is the unit cost factor ($0.00183) for treat- PAGE 18 y ing one unit of BOD per 11000 gallons. Su is the tested SS level for user X or 250 mg/l, whichever is greater. S is the unit cost factor ($0.00227) for treat- ing one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons. PAYMENT aid within i Bills are due when rendered, and become past due it not p 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES order to meet All cervices which require special facilities in subject to the eustome,r facilservice redurrements shall be provided specia PRO_ RATIQN_ OFD FACILITY CHAR for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings Billing annually. Formula: h_ __ys i_.._reading period x customer charge 30 days VOLUMk CN_ ARGE Billing fo volume wastewater during thelbilling aperiod, wastewater Formula: Wast„ov~a_ter v_- ollume x Rate per 1,000 gallons 1000 EF EC~I 1~E DATE stated herein shall be applied to all wastewater The charges 1962. services provided after October 7, PAGE 19 r r 1 SCHEDULE SO IN_TRA-GOVERNMENTAL WASTEWATER SERVICE [Effective 10/7/92] Y-- I AIPL CCATION Applicable to all City of. Denton Departments and agencies for all wastewater service. NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Facility charge $13.00/30 days (2) Volume Charge $2.15/1,000 gallon effluent (3) Surcharge $0.00183/mg/1 of BOD $0.00227/mg/l of TSS Billing shall be based on eighty (80%) percent of water consump- tion. INDUSTRIAL SURCHARG In addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial, there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge based on the following formula: Cu=Viz ([Bu-250] B + [Su-250) S)) Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X. Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X. Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 250 mg/l, whichever is greater. B is the unit cost factor ($0.00183) for treat- ing one unit of BOD per 1,000 gallons. Su is the tested SS level for user X or 250 mg/1, whichever is greater. S is the unit cost factor. ($0.00227) for, treat- ing one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons. PAGE 7.0 4 a MINIMUM BILLING no_._--- ay -yam, 30~ $13,00/30 days PAYMIaT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance, SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider, PRORATION OF FACILITY CHARGE Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually, Formula: Actual-days in reading perio x customer charge 30 days vOL_ UME CHARGE Billing for the wastewater volume shall be based on the wastewater volume calculated during the billing period. Formula: Water volume x ,8 x Rate per 1,000 gallons i " 1000 I ~I PAGE 21 I _ - W.__......._ err 1 I C ~ SCHEDULE SGE 1 SALE OF TREATED WASTEWATER EFFLUENT TO MUNICIPAL UTILITY CUSTOMERS [Effective 10/7/92] APPLICATION Applicable on sales of treated wastewater effluent to any municipal utility. rr Not available for resale in any event. NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Facility Charge $100.00/30 days (2) Volume Charge $ 1.10/1,000 gallon effluent MINIM(1 ,BILLING $100.00/30 days PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACIJL-IT-9S All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. i'RORATION OF FACILITY GTiARGF, (a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual days in readina_ period x customer charge 30 days VOLUME CHARGE Billing for the wastewater volume shall be based on the PAGE 22 Y 9 qz~ effluent volume calculated during the billing period. Formula: Effluent volume x Rate per 1,000 gallons 1000 I I i I PAGE 23 V ~1I \1 1 i SCHEDULE 8M METERED WASTEWATER INSIDE OUTSIDE CORPORATE LIMITS [Effective 10/7/92] APPLICATION Applicable to any wastewater s'.rvice customer desiring to meter all wastewater discharge from a single customer location and not otherwise classified under this ordinance. NET MONTHLY RATE (Inside Corporate (Outside Limits)_ _ Corporate Lim- its). (1) Facility Charge $161.00/30 days $195.00/30 days (2) Volume Charge $2.45/1,000 gals $2.85/1000 gals discharge discharge (3) Surcharge $0.00183/mg/l of BOD $0.00227/mg/l of SS SdPLING/ANALYSIS CHARGE (1) Sampling charge (each) $35.00 (2) Analysis charge (per test) $15.00 INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE In addition to the above charge, there will be added to the net monthly rate for commercial and industrial, an industrial surcharge based on the following formula: CU=Vu ([Bu-250] 8 + [Su-250] S)) Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X, Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X. Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 250 mg/l, whichever is greater. B is the unit cost factor ($0.00183) for treat- PAGE 24 1 V l l i ing one unit of BOD per 1,000 gallons. Su is the tested SS level for user X or 250 1 mg/l, whichever is greater. S ($0.00227) is the unit cost factor for treat- ing one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons. MINIMUM BILLING (Within Corporate (Outside Limits) Corporate Limits) $161.00/30 days $195.00/30 days PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and. become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATIO14 OF FACILITY CHARGE Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings a,inually. Formula: Actual days in__ reading period x customer charge 30 days VOLUME CHARGE Billing for the wastewater volum^ shall be based on the wastewater volume calculated during the billing period. Formula: Wastewater volume x Rate per. 11000 gallons T 1000 PAGE 25 A 1,`10 I L,~~._ SCHEDULE BRW RESIDENTIAL WASTEWATER SERVICE TO11SE_ RS OU_ TSIE CITY OF ~ENTON CORPORATE R~'OT~TE /921 ~vzcE CITY [EffectiveWATER APPLICATION le family residential sewer customers indiv u' te limits of for sing ora of ally metered apa,7tments o unit outside of thetcorpor facilities Applicable with leas than four (4) ~l water from the City the City of Denton and also receiving Denton. NETT THI'Y RATE $6.40/30 days (1) Facility Charge $2.50/1,000 gallon effluent (2) Volume Charge ninety-eight percent Monthly billings shall be calculated by using on for the month aallons determined the herein/ months (98%) of water consumptithousand (30,000) g tion shall months ber. mp the average k~O to a maximum of thirtebruary, actual water consu of December through through NOVreceding months of used. For the months of MarOn for the p monthly rate of water consump used. If the customer did not shall be the actual water ` December through vice February y those prior montl's' November or 10,000 f have water the months march through ! consumption for shall be used. gallons, whichever is less, I i Yz+ MINIM BILLING $6.40/30 days PAYMENT past due if not paid within Bills are due when rendered, and become 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES special facilities in order to meet require, rovidpd subject to the All services which reuirements sha13. be p customer's service requirements special facilities rider. PAGE 26 Dnrmd.i ~i'ro q PRORATION OF FACILITY CHARGE Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on :12 billings annually. Formula: Actual days in reading period x customer charge 30 days VOLUME CHARGE F Billing for the wastewater volume shall be based on the I I wastewater volume calculated during the billing period. Formula: Averac water volume x .98 x Rate per 1 000 1000 , gallons R I PAGE 27 SCHEDULE SRN G RESIDENTTAL WASTEWATER SERVICE TO USERS WITHOUT CITY OF DENTON WATER SERVICE (Effective 10/7/92) APPLICATION Applicable for single family residential service and individually metered apartments or mobile homes or multi-family facilities with less that four (4) units, without City of Denton water service. NET MONTHLY RATE (Inside Corporate Limits) (outside corporate Limits) (1) Facility Charge $5.00/30 days $6.40/30 days (2) Volume Charge $1.90/1,000 gals $2.50/1,000 gals Minimum volume charge will be for five thousand (5,000) gallons per month. MINIMUM BILLING $14,50 Per 30 Days $18,90 per 30 days per resident unit per resident unit PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES _ All servicss which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider, PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS (a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual days in readinna period x customer charge 30 days PAGE 28 y ~a k ~y -a3 ' AreuJa Plo. 02 er sball be based (b? Billing for the aced duringotheebilling period. on wastewat- er volu.me calculated Formula: gallon Avera a water volume x .98 x Rate per 1,000 g 1,000 PAGE 29 r SCHEDULE SCN COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL 14ASTEWATER SERVICE TO USERS WITHOUT , CTTY OF DENTON WATER SERVICE I [Effective 10/7/921 APPLICATION Applicable to all commercial/industrial facilities not also receiving metered water service from the City of Denton, including sub-divisions, for apartments, mobile home parks, or other commercial/ industrial users. The monthly charge for apartments and mobile home parks shall be based on the maximum number of units served during the month. Other commercial/ industrial users will be billed on a case by case basis. NET MONTHLY RATE Inside Corporate outside corpo- rate Limits Limits (1) Facility Charge $ 13.00/30 days $14.40/30 days f (2) Volume Charge $ 2.45/1,000 gals $2.85/1,000 gals Minimum volume charge will be for three thousand (3,000) gallons per month. SAMPLING ANALYSjS _CIi G (1) Sampling Charge $35.00/each (2) Analysis Charge $15.00/test INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE In addition to the above charge, there will be added to the net monthly rate for commercial and industrial, an industrial surcharge based on the following formula: Cu=VU ((Bu-250) B + [Su-250) S) Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X. Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X, PAGE 30 tl Bu is the tested BeDtlevel for user X or 250 mg/10 whichever is g B is the unit cost factor ($0's for treating one unity of BOD per 1,000 gallons Su is the tested SS leevel for user X or 2.50 mg/l, whichever. is g S ($0,00227) is the unit cost factor for treating one unit of SS per 1,Ooo gallons. MINIMUM BILLING ~ $20.35 per 30 days $$21.55 per 30 per unit per unit PAYMENT days from redate ndered, of ndsbecome e past due if not paid within Bills are due when 15 calendar aPF;CIAL FACILMM All services which require special faciliies i subjr t meet customer's service requirements shall be provided special facilities rider. pPRORATION F UTILITY BILLS Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 (a) billings annually. °y Formula: Actual da s in rea in erio x customer charge 30 days on the (b) Billing for the wastewater calculated during the billing dperiod. wastewater volume Formula: Calculate Wastewater volume x Rate per 1,000 gallons 1,000 PAGE 31 1 SCHEDULE SCW SERVTCE COI ERCTAL/INDUSTRIALR tTR&O LTMTTS OUTSTDE CITY OF pEN OTON WATER SERVICE WITS ITY- ~01-- 10/7/92} [Effective or any other facility not industrial orate limits A P P L -IC-P V -ON out ll commercial ce aial , Wastewater servi Applicable to under this ordiing waters a d the cor otherwise cover o nn and receiving of the Ci0ityt of Denton. from the NETY_~-- $14.40/30 days (1) Facility Charge $2.85/110 00 gallon effla nt (2) Volume Charge $00 00183/mg/l of "0' (3) Surcharge $010('227/mg/l of S5 tion. based on eighty (80%) Percent of monthly mater consume Billing CHARGE ALYSTS SAMPLING J/-AN $35.00 Sampling charge (each) $15.00 Analysis charge (per test) and industrial, INDUSTRTALSURCHARGE anercial induettia1 surcharge mm charge f or to the above in addition net monthly rate there will be addend ing the net based on the foll "250J S}) Cu-VU ((pu'250J B + ISU e for user X• Where Cu is the surcharg 1000 gallons for Vu is the billing volume Per user X. user or 250 gOD level for Hu is the tested rester. mg/1, whichever is g for treat- is the unit cost factor ($0.00183) PAGE 32 lF SCHEDULE SCW COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER SERVICE OUTSIDE CITY OF DENTON CORPORATE LIMITS WITH CITY OF DENTON WATER SERVICE (Effective 10/7/92] APPLICATION Applicable to all commercial, industrial or any other facility not otherwise covered under this ordinance outside the corporate limits of the City of Denton and receiving water and wastewater service from the City of Denton. NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Facility Charge $14.40/30 days (2) Volume Charge $2.85/1,000 gallon effluent (3) Surcharge $0.00183/mg/l of BOD $0.00227/mg/l of SS Billing based on eighty (80%) percent of monthly water consumption. SAMPLING/ANALYSIS CHARGE I Sampling charge (each) $35.00 Analysis charge (per test) $15.00 INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE S E~. in addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial, there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge based on the following formula: i Cu=Vu ((BU-250] B + [Su-250) S]) Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X. Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X. Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 250 mg/1, whichever is greater.. B is the unit cost factor ($0.00183) for treat- PAGE 32 lmllrh NO ing one unit BOD per 1,000 gallons. Su is the tested SS level for user X or 250 mg/1, whichever is greater. unit of SS per 1000 gallons. treat- S ing the MINIMUM BILLING $14.40/30 days PAYM NT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES customer's eser.vice requirements All servis which require special facilities in order special facilities rider. PRORATION OF FACILITY CHARGES (a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Pctual day in reading perm x customer charge 30 days VOLUME CHARGE wastewater Billl.ng for the shall wastewater volumecalcul ted during thebilling aperiod the Formula: Rater volume x,.8 x Rate per 1,000 gallons 1,000 PAGE 33 _VW I i:,,f WASTEWATER TAP FEES (Effective 10/07/92) APPLICATION This schedule applies to the installation, removal, or relocation of wastewater taps by the City of Denton Utility department at the request of a person, firm, association or corporation. + TAP FEES Any person, association of persons, or corporation that requests that a wastewater main tap be removed, installed, or relocated by the Utility department shall pay in advance to the Utility department the following applicable fees: PAGE 34 I Gc,r.-rrfd WAST 6A`rER TAPS WTTH CLEA~_NAUT_ Paved Street gDRA Ved-Stret Size of Tap-- $ 710.00 $ 335.00 4 inch $ 735,00 $ 360.00 6 inch $ 400.00 8 inch $ 775.00 $ 435.00 10 inch $ 835.00 FEES FOR ?NSTALLATIONS NOT LISTED eci.fied, for which a fee is not sp on the For inst~~llatiopaf intap dvance a deposit based up the requester shall estimated cost of such installation, or an administration charge similar work, Plus of 20%. Upoti completion of the applicant lor similar work requested e the e shall be billed at act.ua] cost, as determined by the Utility department, plus a asha11 istrative charge. Any excess deposit be refunded to the applicant.. PAGE 35 ~L 7 p~;et;r~;1 No J,rJ; Itd9nl__ - SPECIAL FACILITIES RIDER (1) All service shall be offered from available facilities. If a customer service characteristic requires facilities and devices which are not normally and readily available at the location which the customer requests service, then the City shall provide the service subject to paragraph 2 of this schedule. (2) The total. cost of all facilities reburied to meet the customer's load characteristics which are incurred by the city shall be subject to a special contract entered into between the Utility dprthe iorcto the Cityhprovidingcservice to signed by both th parties the customer. r i PAGE 36 y I SECTION IS. That if any section, subsection clause , paragraph, sentence, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION III. That the schedule of Rates herein adopted shall be effective, charged and applied to all wastewater service accruing on or after October 7, 1992. PASSED AND APPROVED this _ day of 1992. BOB CASTLFBERRY, MAYOR _ CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: ALL00361 PAGE 37 Ll LL CITY -r COUNCIL ~r - J I 4 - ooopoWOO Dpp~G a - - 'OO~nQ y N oQQOD ' . V o q 0 0 o Q. 4~o~Q~O T o M t ~ O~O~~~O °0ppaaaaenop°. 3 U3b September 29~ 1992 AJI CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: RE; RECEIVE A REPORT AND HOLD A DISCUSSION ON THE SOLID WASTE RATE STUDY ANDE1PROPOSED SOLID WASTE LANDFILL RATES AND GIVE STAFF 1 RECOMMENDATION their meeting of September 9, The Public Utility Board, at Council approval of the Solid commended to the City Wa19s92, te raatetess, , pending rending legal approval. BACKGROUND/ SUMMARY: The ordinance provides for a $0rate increase for residential customers from $9.95 to $10.30 for the basic rate per 30 days. The State of Texas surcharge for solid waste received at the landfill is being passed on to both of a residential and commercial customers in the separate itemfof the bil3l..5% charge which will be shown as a The residential collectionese,eviceseincludingtinflation yassociated with providing personal services. There has not been a since with fuel and ncr residential or, commercial solid waste an theecost of payments pass 1990. The 3.5% surcharge is to the City Is required to make to the State for solid waste received at the City landfill. The absorbedrthisgadditional state received at landfills was more than tripled in September Wast The on has waste cost over thelcurrent cfiscal. iyear. Exhibit I contains a summary of Solid Waste rate changes. Exhibit II contains the residential Exhibit sntaainitation collection services ordinance. Board meeting. minutes of the September 9th Public Utility Page 2 PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED, All residential and commercial solid waste Customers. Respectfully submitted, i LHarrell, City Manager Prepared by: Bill Angelo, Direct ' Community service Approved by' L_ Howard Martin, irector Environmental Operations/ Financial Administration Exhibits: I. Summary of Solid Waste Rate Changes II. Ordinance III. Minutes of PUB Meeting of 9/9/92 ~yy 9 i I 1 CITY OF DENTON SOLID WASTE "0-fILITY-----'~~ CURRENT VERSUS PROPOSED A-TES-- Rate ScheduieY Proposed Y Current Rates Rates ' Residential - SWi Facll ty Charge $ 10.30 9,98 Surcharge 0.35 0.00 Commercial - SW2 Dumpsters: Cubic Yards Collected Per Week Rate Per Cubic Yard Per Week 1 3 8.93 8.93 4 - 6 6.92 6,92 7 10 6.66 6.66 11 - 25 6,52 6.52 26 50 6.47 6.47 51 100 6.29 6.29 101 125 6.02 6.02 126 - 150 5.93 5,93 151 - 175 6.65 5.65 176 and over 5,47 5.47 Open Tops/Compactors Rent Per 30 Days 20 CY Open Top 39.53 39.53 30 CY Open Top 52.50 52.50 40 CY Opon Top 67.76 57.75 12 CY Compactor 87,15 87.15 15 CY Compactor 89.25 69.25 20 OY Compactor 115.50 116.50 25 GY Compactor 115.50 115.50 30 CY Compactor 157.50 157.50 42 CY Compactor 176.40 176.40 Open Tops/Compactors Service Charge Per Cubic Yard 20 CY Open Top 5,40 5.40 30 CY Open Top 5.40 5.40 40 CY Of.sn Top 5.40 5.40 12 CY Compactor 6.40 5.40 15 CY Compactor 6.40 5.40 20 CY Compactor 5.40 5.40 25 CY Compactor 5,40 5.40 30 CY Compactor 5,40 6.40 42 CY Compactor 5.40 5.40 Landfill Rate 3.45 3.45 Special Waste 6.60 0.00 Commercial Surcharge 3.50% 0100% paid" COMPW10i AbnlAy Rentil ?eel of MNI Y 6,11hp Container Dnlivory Fee 50.00 50.00 Tire Cutting Chargas, Automobile Tires 2,00 2.00 Truck Tires 4,00 2.00 Ft nn4: rto ._.__9a ~a•G EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITY BOARD MINUTES September 9, 1992 The following two items were considered together: 11. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING RATES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL SANITATION COLLECTION SERVICES. 12. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING RATES FOR USE OF THE CITY'S SANITARY LANDFILL. Nelson introduced this item. Angelo then explained that r' residential rates are recommended to Increase 3.5%, plus an additional 35(P per customer due to the State landfill surcharge. Commercial rates will also increase 3.5% due to State landfill surcharge; it is proposed to leave the landfill's rates the same, with the exception of adding $2 to cover tires, also a state-mandated fee, plus going to a $4 special waste handling fee since this is such a labor intensive procedure. Laney made a motion to recommend to the City Council approval of these two rate adjustment recommendations. Second by Coplen. All ayes, no nays, motion carried. w AAAOOD4D y e2 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON ESTABLISHING RATES FOR RESI- DENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL SANITATION COLLECTION SERVICES AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 24 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the charges for residential garbage collection services as authorized by Section 24-42(b) of Article II of Chapter 24 of the Code of Ordinances is hereby established in the amount of Ten Dollars and 30/100 ($10.30) for each individual family unit for each thirty (30) day period. In addition, each unit shall be assessed a fee of thirty-five cents (350), or 3.5% of the monthly service charge, to reimburse the State of Texas for the statutory surcharge for landfills ac- cepting solid waste. SECTION II. That the charges for commercial and institutional garbage collection services, established in accordance with Section 24-66 of Article III of Chapter 24 of the Code of Ordinances, shall hereafter be: A. DUMPSTERS Cubic Yards Rate Per Collected Per SVeek Cubic Yard Per Week 1-3 $8.93 4-6 6.92 7-10 6.66 11-25 6.52 26-50 6.47 51-100 6.29 101-125 6.02 126-150 5.93 151-175 5.65 176 or more 5.47 B. OPFM TOP CONTAINERS AND COMPACTORS Type of Rent Container per 30 Days Service Charge 20 cubic yard open top $39.53 $5.40 per cubic yard 30 cubic yard open top 52.50 5.40 per cubic yard 40 cubic yard open top 57.75 5.40 per cubic yard 12 cubic yard compactor. 87.15 5.40 per cubic yard 15 cubic yard compactor 89.25 5.40 per cubic yard owipm h Types of Rent Per_ 39 -Days Service Char e container 20 cubic yard compactor $115.50 5'40 per cubic yard 25 cubic yard compactor 115.50 55.40 .40 per cubic yard 30 cubic yard compactor 157.50 42 cubic yard compactor 176.40 5.40 per cubic yard An additional 3.5% charge will be assessed to compensate for the State of Texas Surcharge for Solid Waste received at Landfills. A delivery fee of $50.00 per container will be charged to all new customers for open top containers and compactors. SECTION III. That this ordinance become effective im- mediately upon its passage and app j 1 PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of p 1992. 1 BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST; JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY \ 1 . BY; PAGE 2 - =CITY - COIaNCIL r - - -TX T I T: :7, TTT -o~oooo~'anoao o~oooo_ ooo, rood - o U 0 0°. 4a 500`a O~O~ti p0 CITY COUNCIL REPORT hcolf,c TO. Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Charitable Solicitation at Intersections DATE: September 29, 1992 BACKGROUND: In 1988, the City Council received an increasing number of complaints about persons and organizations attempting to solicit business or charitable contributions from the occupants of vehicles j at intersections. Groups and individuals were soliciting on 1 numerous busy intersecl-lons all over the city, causing traffic problems and endangering the individuals collecting the funds. In March 1988, the City Counci.l discussed this problem at a work session and felt that solicitation upon roadways was dangerous for the person: engaging in solicitation as well as a traffic impediment of intersections. The Council felt that safer alternatives for soliciting charitable contributions were available without utilizing public streets and rights of way. As a result of the City Council's discussion, the City Attorney was directed to draft an ordinance addressing solicitation at intersections and roadways. The proposed ordinance was adopted and is the current provision in the Code that, prohibits solicitation in roadways. Section 21-10(a) of the City Code reads as fellows: No person shall be upon any street or roadway or be or go upon t..hu :shoulder or median of any street or roadway for the purpose of soliciting business or charitable contributions of any kind from the occupant of any vehicle. At the September 1, 1992, City Councs..i Meeting Alan Hempstead, representing the City's firefighters, requested an e::emption to Section 21-10(a) on behalf of the Muscular Dystrophy Association's (MDA) Annual Fill-the-Boot Campaign. Firefighters have traditionally collected funds at intersections for MDA. However, since 1488, the City's firefighters have solicited twice at alternate locations on private property because of. Denton's ordinance:, Mr. Hempstead :mentioned two Oklahoma cities that made special provisions for their annual Fill-the-Boot Campaign despite local ordinances that prohibit solicitation in roadways, Because the ~I request was presented as a Citizen Report the Council was unable to take any action or make any decision at that time. A councilmember requested that the item be placed on a future work session agenda. SUMMARY: ' Veronica Oglesby, Administrative Intern, collected information from several metroplex cities as well as the two cities in Oklahoma mentioned in Alnn Hempstead's presentation. The results of this survey are attached, i Ten of the 13 cities contacted currently have local ordinances addressing solicitation on streets and rights of way. Four of the 10 cities permit solicitation on streets and rights of way through their local ordinance- Grand Prairie, Lewisville, Carrollton and Plano. These four Texas cities have additional permitting requirements. Solicitation is also permitted in the City of Allen even though it does not have a local ordinance addressing solicitation on streets and rights of way. In the City of Allen the Police Department handles all solicitation problems as obstruction of traffic. 'i Grand Prairie permits organizations that register to solicit on roadwc,-1s as long as the solicitation does not impede traffic, The ordinance requires organizations to show proof of insurance and charter of incorporation, It also specifies the dates and times the solicitation may take place, Lewisville also limits charitable solicitation to certain weekends and hours. In addition, Lewisville requires proof that the charitable organization meets the definition as established by the Internal Revenue serviue. Plano requires the organization to wear traffic safety vests at :il times, to provide proof of insurance, and to sign a liability waiver in favor of the city. The City of Plano permits solicitation in the rights of way as long as it is not a state highway or farm-to-market road. The City of Carrollton permits solicitation at intersections provided the organization executes a written agreement releasing the City from any liability arising from the solicitation drive, It also states that no person shall walk on the main roadway and no solicitation is to take place along arterial highways during the morning and evening rush hours. Tulsa, Oklahoma, one of the two cities Alan Hempstead referred to in his presentation, permits only sworn public safety officers to solicit in roadways for charitable projects adopted by their bargaining agents. According to the Municipal Code and the Motor Vehicles and Traffic Code received from Oklahoma City no person shall stand in a roadway for the purpose of soliciting donations. However, the police department says the area firefighters stand in the median without violating the ordinance. f ~I / a29 After reviewing the information received from the 13 cities, i appears that 'the issue of soliciting charitable contributions in roadways is a concern. For many of the citi,is, regulating solicitation in roadways is a problem despite local ordinances. j Because of the many problems and safety concerns some cities have chosen to prohibit solicitation in the roadways altogether. However, other cities have dealt with the issue by designating specific roadways and suggesting alternative locations to solicit funds. These alternative locations include parking lots, shopping centers and grocery stores. Several of the cities are currently researching and updating their ordinance. In the absence of a local ordinance regulating charitable r.ontributions in roadways the state law prevails, Article IX Section 81 (c) of the Texas -Traffic Laws states: A person may not stand in a roadway for the purpose of soliciting a ride, contributions, employment or business from the occupant of any vehicle, except that a person may stand in a roadway to solicit charitable contributions if authorized by the local authority having jurisdiction over the roadway. State law prohibits solicitation on roadways and from occupants of vehicles. However, it allows cities to give an exemption foi- charitable contributions with City Council approval. A reque6. would still need to be made to the City Council. This seems to give a City Council more flexibility in determining what charitable group may solicit, However, the Legal Department has stated that the City Council would not be able to discriminate between two charitable organizations, in reality, all charitable organizations who requested an exemption from the City Council would be allowed to solicit donations at intersections if the City Council were to repeal its current ordinance and go to the state law provision. RESPEC ULLX SUBMITTED, h Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: Catherine E, Tuck Administrative Assistant SUMMARY OF LOCAL FiREA SOS. T C T'Z'AT T ON c7RD T NANC E:~ CITY LOCAL CHARITABLE fiO_LICITATI0N S0LICITATIdl1 ORDINANCE ~N RICHT-OF-WAYS 1. OKLAHOMA CITY YES NO 2. TULSA YES NO- only sworn ptiablio safety officers may solicit in roadways for chari.Y.able projects adopted by thsir bargaining agents 3. ADDISON YES NO 4. ALLEN NO YES 6. ARLINGTON NO NO prohibited by a section of the Utreet Code Pedestrians on RoadwayD 6. CARROLLTON YES YES 7. DALLAS NO-repealed 8/92 governed by State Law 6. FARMERS BRANCH YES NO 9. GARLAND YES NO 10. GRAND PRAIRIE YES YES 11. LEW18VILLE YES YES YES YES ; 12. PLANO YES NO 13. UNIVERSITY PARK i o 4 I l , SUR_' /E:W (:7 F' _9 7.CJCAT, Ci SPIES' ,..r SOZ=C2TA'1'1'C7N (7RD2N.ANCES uG'/ 1. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma The City of Oklahoma City does have an ordinance regarding charitable solicitation. Section 13-36 of the Oklahoma City Municipal Code reads: No person or organization shall directly or indirectly solicit money, donations of money r for charitable, educational, religious, patriotic or philanthropic purposes, on the streets unless such person or organization has first obtained a permit. Section 32-458(a) of the Motor Vehicles and Traffic Code states that no person shall stand in a-roadway for the purpose of soliciting a ride, donations, employment or business from the occupant of any vehicle, In response to Mr. Hempsteads report that Oklahoma City made special provisions for the MDA Will-the -Boot Campaign, the Police Department said no one is permitted to solicit in the public rights of way. However, the firefighters stand in the median without violating any ordinance, 2. Tulsa, Oklahoma The City of Tulsa does have an ordinance regulating charitable contributions, the City of Tulsa Oklahoma Charter and Reviscad_ Ordinances, Title 37 Chapter. 11 Section 1105, Title 37 states: No person shall step or stand in the roadway or median to channel traffic for the purpose of soliciting a ride, employment, business, or contributions of any kind from the occupant of any vehicle; provided however, that sworn public safety officers may solicit contributions for a charitable project officially adopted by their bargaining agents. 3. Addison, Texas They do have a local solicitation ordinance, Nan-profit/charitable organizations are exempt from paying for permit registration, However, no one is permitted to solicit on public streets or in the right-of-way. fi Il4. Allen, Texas l I The City of Allen does not have and ordinance regulating solicitation in the rights of way. If soliciting becomes a problem the Police Department handles the situation as an obstruction of traffic. 5. Arlington, Texas They have no local ordinance regarding soliciting charitable contributions. However, soliciting in roadways is prohibited by Section 6.05 of the Street Code, Pedestrians on Roadways. 6. Carrollton, Texas They have a local ordinance regarding soliciting charitable contributions. Charitable solicitation upon public streets is allowed provided the organization obtains a permit from the Director of Traffic and Transportation, Included in the information needed to obtain a permit is the provision that the o:ganizatlon execute a written agreement releasing the City from liability due to injury or damage arising from the solicitation drive. Other provisions of the ordinance state that no person shall walk on the main roadway, and no solicitation shall take place along arterial highways Monday through Friday, 7am to gam and ipm to 6pm. 7. Dallas, Texas They had a local ordinance regarding charitable solicitation, however it was repealed August 26, 1992. 8. Farmers Branch, Texas The Police Department handles all solicitation permits. No one is allowed to solicit on street corners medians or at intersections, 9. Garland They do have a local ordinance regarding soliciting. It is illegal to solicit on city property and no one is allowed to solicit in the streets. 10. Grand Prairie They do have a local charitable solicitation ordinance and it permits charitable organizations to solicit on roadways as long as they do not impede traffic and have previously applied for and received a permit. Specific provisions required to receive a permit state that the organization must file an application 30 days prior to the activity, and provide phone numbers of persons or organizations to receive the funds collected by solicitation, Also the organization must provide a copy of thoir charter or articles of incorporation and sign an affidavit stating that at least 75% of the monies collected will go directly to the stated charity. The \ ,M 1 7 . o J oroanizetion may solicit only between the hours of 9am - 9pm Mon ay/ through Saturday, and must provide proof of insurance. Permits are issued for not more than 3 consecutive days within a 30 day period and only 2 such permits per calendar year. 11. Lewisville They do have a local ordinance regarding charitable solicitations in roadways. Charitable organizations are allowed to stand in a roadway provided they first register and obtain a permit in of the ordinances stwith ate t that rsolicit tion imayc take p place onlys during certain weekends of certain months and for no more than 3 consecutive days, Soliciting i.a permitted only at spocific intersections of crossings between lam arid 7pm, The application for the permit is to be filed not less than five (5) days before the proposed solicitation and must include proof that the nharitable organization meets the definition as establisher! by the Internal Revenue Service. 12. Plano way ordinance Charitable organizationsaholdingipermits solicitation They publlico rights of local conduct solicitations within the city and upon public: rights of way provided no charitable solicitation shall be conducted upon or within the rights of way of any State of Texas street/road or any farm-to--market road. Other provisions state that solicitation must be conducted during daylight hours, for no more than 1 consecutive 24 hour period per year per organization. They must also provide in favor certificate and fweinsurance, execute a waiver ar traffic safety vests at o all liability tiimes, of the City 13. University Park The City of University Park does have a local ordinance regulating solicitations, Persons seeking contributions for a charitable purpose must register with the Chief of Police and the Chief of is issue Police will certificate p prohibited on any public street, alley, or traffic island. ~I I. f -CITY COUNCIL -T: 11T ooooo~aao~' gp'pU _ TT: o T. - co lk di ODU r 0 M e f VSO. UOppQQggGO~~~~ } CITY COUNCIL REPORT Ia': T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM., Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager DATE: September 14, 1992 SUBJECTt BACKGROUND ON THE FRY STREET FAIR BACKGROUND The Fry Street Fair, sponsored by the Delta Lodge, has occurred annually for the last thirteen years. The event is a street fair with arts and crafts and music with proceeds going to various charity organizations. Although the event began as a small street party, over the years it has drawn crowds in the thousands to the small area between Oak and Hickory streets, The large numbers of people in attendance coupled with the large amounts of alcohol consumed throughout the afternoon and into the night has caused 1111 complaints by neighbors and increased police problems. Although in the past several years there has been no alcohol sold outside, fair attenders were able to purchase alcohol at clubs on Fry Street and bring in their own alcohol. Parking and litter from the large numbers of people also causer', i%coblems in the Fry Street area. Noise complaints and public intoxication incidents have also been a matter of concern. I The fraternity held the street fair on Fry Street, between Oak and Hickory, every spring for the first ten years. The last three years, the Fair was held on sites other than Fry Street. 1990 FRY STREET FAIR In 1990, the City Council rejected (by a vote of 4-3) the Delta Lodge's request to close Fry Street because a landowner voiced an objection to the street closing. The event was held at the North Texas State Fairgrounds. The 1990 event resulted in large numbers of complaints from the neighbors who live near the Fairgrounds. The event was not well-planned and did not have adequate security, portable toilets, or clean up crews. Public intoxication and related inappropriate behavior were major complaints in the neighborhood and in Denton Center. In addition, there were parking, noise, and litter complaints. Based on the large numbers of complaints by citizens, the North Texas State Fair Association determined that the Fry Street Fair could not return to the Fairgrounds, 19:xl FRY STREET FAIR In 3.991, the Delta Lodge again requested that the City Council close Fry Street. Twice the number of off duty police officers w© e 3 to be hired to provide security for the event on Fry Street. A more detailed plan for security and clean up were provided than 1v past years. However, the same landowner again voiced opposition to the street closing. Grace Temple Baptist Church also voiced an objection to the event being held on Fry Street. All the tenants and other landowners (except Curtis Loveless) had given their consent to the closing. However, the City Attorney informed the City Council that property owners have a right to access their property via a public street. By closing the street over a property owner's objection, the City Council could be opening itself up for potential damages. The City Council rejected (by a 4-3 vote) the street closing request, The Delta Lodge hold I the Fry Street Fair at Carriage Square in 1991. 1992 FRY STREET FAIR In 1992, the Delta Lodge's request to close Fry Street came to the City Council without the same landowner's consent. The City Council did not feel it could approve the Fry Street closing without all property owners' consent, However, in order to assist the Delta Dodge, directed the Mayor and City Manager to meet with I the North Texas Fair Association's board of directors to see if an arrangement for the event to be held at the Fairgrounds. The Mayor and City Manager met with the Fair board and the Delta Lodge and negotiated additional conditions for the Delta Lodge in order to hold the event at the Fairgrounds (please see copy attached), The additional conditions placed on the Delta Lodge were negotiated jointly and were more restrictive than any rental group normally had to comply with at the Fairgrounds. Additionally, the City Council granted an exemption to the Sunday restriction on loudspeakers, amplifiers, and musical instruments in the City's noise ordinance. Despite the additional conditions met by the Delta Lodge, many of the neighbors were still concerned with the behavior, of those who attended the Fry Street Fair. Please advise if I can provide additional information. RIESPE FULLY SUBMITTED, 1 Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared byt Catherine E. 'l'uck Administrative Assistant ant FRY STREET FAIR CONDITIONS AT THE NORTH TEXAS FAIRGROUND Fair Date April 12, 1992 CONDITIONS Security 15 Off Duty Police Officers 39 Delta Lodge security positions 2-10 Band security officers The Delta Lodge will ensure that the security and off duty officers meet with the business owners and check with them throughout the event. Portable Toilets 35 Port-a-lets Six available in the parking areas plus building facilities Litter/Clean U2 Delta Lodge hiring a company to clean up inside the Fairgrounds Delta Lodge to clean up: Parking lot of. Kroger and rest of center In residontial area as far as the trash is found in the two churches property and retirement home In the Hinkle area " t Fence A six foot chain link fence will surround the area for the Fair Several entrances will be manned by security officers and will keep alcohol from being brought into the event Fair Time Tho Fair will open at noon, with the "Star Spangled Banner" at app,toximately 3.2:l5p,m, and the first band starting at 12:30 p.m, it will and no later than 10:00 p.m. and beer sales will stop at 900 P.M. Other Conditions The Delta Lodge will provide full details of this meeting in writing to Mr.. James Roden and both parties will sign off on it, Additionally, a contract with security deposits and other provisions will be signed, Meeting Date: March 20, 1992 AGENDA rrEM#5 - 9/29/92 Denton Municipal Utilities FY 1993 'H'ATER RATE STUDY [DENTON r TEXAS Dedicated to Quality Service AGENDA ITEM#5 - 9/29/92 Denton Municipal Utilities FY 1993 WATER RATE STUDY EDEENTO J TEXA Dedicated to Quality Service r I 4 COST OF SERVICE AND WATER RATE DESIGN FISCAL YEAR 1993 w~ ~ F l PREPARED FOR 1 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD DENTON CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 1992 Lj R. E. NELSON, Executive Director Department of Utilities 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PAGE NO. 1. INTRODUCTION I II. METHODOLOGY 1-3 111. RESULTS 3 IV. IMPACT OF RATE INCREASE 34 ON RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS V. IMPACT OF IRATE INCREASE 4 ON COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS VI. COMPARISON OF RATES WITH 4 OTHER CITIES REVENUE REQUIREMENTS To SOURCES 5 H. METHODOLOGY III. USE OF UTILITY BASIS FOR 6 WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS 7 EXHIBIT 1 - REVENUE TARGET COST OF SERVICE 1. SOURCES 8 8-14 no METHODOLOGY EXHIBIT 11 - COST OF SERVICE 15-45 EXHIBIT IIA - UTILITY VERSUS CASH BASIS 46 I ~ TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTIMI)) RATE DESIGN PAGE NO. I. SOURCES 47 II. METHODOLOGY 47 III. RESULTS 47-4$ IV. BILL COMPARISON 49 V. COMPARISON OF RATES WITH + OTHER CITIES 49 EXHIBI'T' III - RATE DESIGN .50-59 EXHIBIT IV - BILL COMPARISON 60-64 EXHIBIT V - COMPARISON OF RATES 65 WITH OTHER CITIES EXHIBITS "I. DEVELOPMENT OF REVENUE TARGET 7 H. COST OF SERVICE 1545 IIA. UTILITY VERSUS CASH BASIS 46 III. RATE DESIGN 5U-59 IV, BILL COMPARISON 60-64 V. COMPARISON OF RATES WITH OTIIER CITIES 65 RATE ORDINANCES 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 i 1 WATER RATE STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION A Water utility rate study has been conducted to determine the rate change necessary to meet the revenue requirement reflected in the fiscal year 1993 Water department budget. Major impacts on the budget include new Ray Roberts recreational payments, additional revenue funded capital asset r additions, and well demolition. These are offset to some extent by decreases in some operating and maintenance expenses. The rate study was based on the Cost of Service model used in development of the fiscal year 1992 rate study, Some adjustments were made in the methodology used for wholesale costs of service determination in this rate study, II. METHODOLOGY The 1993 water rate study was conducted following a basic three step processr A. REVENUE REQUIRMMUTS The fiscal. year 1993 Water rate study was developed from the costs identified in the fiscal year. 1993 portion of the 1993-1997 Capital Improvements Plan, the fiscal year 1993 operating budget, and other non-operating expenses. This provides the overall level of rates needed to meet _r_ y T 1 1 1 financial obligations during the budget year. The revenue requirement includes a 6% return on net investment to General Government and an overall 1.25 debt { coverage ratio, Exhibit I reviews the development of revenue targets for fiscal year 1993, Expenses, revenue, and net gain/loss are shown by customer class, Revenues and net gain/loss are displayed both without -a rate increase and with a proposed rate increase of 5.9W. I B. COST OF SERVICE STUDY The second step in the rate study is to identify the cost associated with each customer class. These costa are distributed to customers based on identifiable allocation factors, This process identifies the relative demand placed on the water system by each customer and seta the stage for specific rate design. our two wholesale customers are treated separately due to differences in their respective contracts. The results from the cost of service can be found in Exhibit II. C, RATE DESIGN The revenue requirements and cost of service allocation provides target revenues for each customer class. The actual rate design involves the development of specific facility and volume charges. Volume charges for residential customers differ during the summer and winter periods. The rate per 1,000 gallons of water consumption is constant during winter months, but higher rates are charged for greater consumption during summer months. -2- 1 Block rates for summer period are 0-15,000, 15,000- 30,000, and over 30,000 gallons. i The results of the rate design can be found in Exhibit III. III. RESULTS Analysis of existing water rates estimates fiscal year 1993 revenue of $12,174,546 and expenses of $12,857,976 for a loss of $683,430. With the proposed rates outlined in this document, water revenue would increase by 5.9% to $12,893,438, resulting in a gain of $35,462. A summary of the rate increases by customer class are shown below. Rgaidential onmercia Government yZholesale iolegAlg 'T'otal Corinth LCMUA 6.11$ 6.09% 9.95V 0176% 2.58* 5.90% IV. IMPACT OF RATE INCREASE ON RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS Current versus proposed rates and bill comparisons for residential customers are shown in Exhibit IV, Exhibit IV, Table 1 compares the bill, of an average residential customer in 1993 at current and proposed rates. The proposed water rate increase would result in an average $2.35 increase in the monthly bill during 1993, from $30.45 to $32.80, or 7.72k. Exhibit .IV, Table 2 compares the bill of a residential customer with large water consumption at current and proposed rates. The proposed rate increase would result in an average $3.25 increase in the monthly bill during 1992, from $58.30 to $61.55, or 5,57W. -3- , 1 Exhibit IV, Table 3, compared the bill of a residential customer with very large water consumption at the current and proposed rates. The new rates would result in an increase in the average month of $3,25, from $91.80 to $95.05, or 3.541, V. IMPACT OF RATE INCREASE ON COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS Exhibit IV, Table 4, compares the bill of an average commercial customer in fiscal, year 1993 at current and proposed rates. With an average monthly water consumption of r 40,000 gallons, the proposed rate change would result in an average monthly bill increase of $7.40 from 118.85 to $126.25, or 6.23%. V1. COMPARISON OF RATES WITH OTHER. CITIES j Exhibit V provides a comparison of the City of Denton proposed water rates with Lewisville, Arlington, Carrollton, and Garland. These cities are currently reviewing projected rate increases and actual rates are subject to change by October It 1992. -4- REVENUE R-EQUIREMWNTS I VFW REVENUE REQUIREMENTS I 1 LVatf , REVENUE REQUIREMENTS I. g04RCE9 Revenue requirements were determined by using data from fiscal year 1993 Operating Budget, 1993-1997 Capital Improvements Plan, and associated proforma documents, as revised; the 1992 Utilities Forecast; revised department fiscal year 1992 revenue and expense estimates; and financial information from the Finance Department, II. METHODOLOGY Revenue requirements were developed by using the most current utility department documents. However, dada on in capitalized plant assets, administrative support charges, depreciation, and debt service were obtained from the Finance Department. In some cases, plant in service was revised by the most recent Utility department estimates. This data was used to compute wastewater return on investment and depreciation charges specific to wholesale customers. Because the revenue and expense estimates continue to evolve over time, some adjustments must be made to the existing forecast and budget data. In addition, some rate increases must be implemented over a two or three year period. This may i result in reductions in planned expenditures. These adjustments have been made to the extent possible as of the date of this document, -5- ~1 III. USE OF UTILITY BASIS FOR WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS i Wholesale customers revenue requirements are based on a utility versus cash basis. Total costs include a proportional share of budgeted expenses; a 9.01t ROI on net treatment plant, interceptors, and one-half of lift stations; a 4% street rental fee, and a share of capital depreciation on all net plant, interceptors, and one-half of lift station assets. For this rate study, some changes in methodology were made. All contributed capital was removed from the return on investment (ROI) calculation; federal contributed capital was removed for calculation of depreciation expense; payment in lieu of taxes was removed; ROI was charged on capitalized working capital (calculated at 12.5k of 0&M); capital work in progress (CWIP) Interest was included at the average interest rate; and both wholesale customers were combined into one wholesale rate class. An illustration of the utility and cash methodology is provided in Exhibit IIA of the cost of service section of the study. -6- EXHIBIT I REVENUE REQUIREMENTS Y I. 1 1 I 1 CITY OF DENTON WATER UTILITY DEVELOPMENT OF REVENUE TARGETS ' Desari Ion Resldentfal CommerClal _Govemmem Corinth LCMUA T'otal FY 1993 Expenses $5,769,788 $6,003,758 $331,398 $430,186 $332,846 $12,857,976 FY 1993 Revenues 9,443,849 697165 $283.602 425i 4120 12174,646 Q Current Rates FY 1993 Net GaIN(Loss) ($316,939) ($306,603) ($47,796) ($4,366) ($8,728) ($683,430) i i FY 1993 Proposed 6.11% 6.09% 9.95% 0.76% 2,58% 5.90% Percerd Increase FY 1993 Revenues $6,776.226 $U43.88 11,81 3 $429,039 2 479 112,893.4 38 Q Proposed Rates FY 1993 Net 4aIrMoss) $16,438 $40,124 ($19,685) ($1,147) ($387) $35,462 i r~ l1 COST OF SERVICE 1 . 1 1I 1 COST OF SERVICE 1. SOURCES The sources of data for the development of the Cost of Service Study were the revenue requirements model, current fiscal year 1993 Operating Budget and associated proforma, 1993-1997 Capital Improvements Plan, 1992 Utilities Forecast, Finance Department, and water utility staff. II. METHODOLOGY A. INTRODUCTION The following customer classes were used in the ` development of the Cost of Service Study: f 1. Residential Ilhl z. Commercial 3. Government - City, County, DISD 4. Wholesale Corintli/hake Cities Each residential, commercial, and government class represents a combination of all rate customers in that class. B. DESCRIPTION OF COST OF SERVICE MODEL The cost model uses the base-extra capacity allocation process to determine cost associated with each customer class. The first step is to allocate costs to the functional components: base casts, extra-capacity costa, and customer costs. -8- 1 I J Base Costa are defined as those costs that occur principally related to the total annual quantity of ,i water used. 2. Extra Capacity Costs are those costs that occur principally to meet peak-day demands. 3, Customer Costs are those costs related to customer billings and meter costs. those functional component costs The next step is to allocate to each customer class. 1, Base Costa are allocated nual age ofc~.heu totalr anclass according to it's per water consumption forecast. 2. Extra Capacity Costs (peak-day) are allocated to ~ each customer class in relation ttt year consumption load factor I as detennined by analyzing data. 3, Customer Costs are allocated according to the number of billings and meter cost equivalents. theter costs equivalents are developed according relative cost invested in each customer's meter. C. DESCRIPTION OF SECTIONS The Cost of Service Study was divided into 13 sections which are briefly describad below. 1. Section 13 S%u=ary of Revenue and Cost Allocations (Cost WI) -9- This section summarizes the allocation of cost between the three functional components of base costs, extra capacity costs, and customer costs. This summary essentially outlines the total cost of operation and includes the revenue required to cover these costs. Total revenue includes additional revenue to be collected through a rate increase. Information is divided between sources and uses of working capital and reflects the rate I increase required. Section 2s Allocation of Departmental Expenditure (Coat W4a) This section allocates fiscal. year 1993 Operational Budget expenditures to each of the six water divisions. Expenditures are shown by expense category and allocated to base, extra capacity, and customer cost components. Section 31 Allocation of New Additions to Plant (Cost W5A) This section allocates new capital assets that are added to the water plant in service during fiscal year 1992 and 1993, Specific asset categories are shown and allocated within each division to the three functional cost components. With the exception of the distribution water mains, water hydrants, and. water meters, new additions were t allocated to base average day costs. -10- e 4. Sections 4,5,6, and 7: Gross Hook Value, Depreciation Expense, Accumulated Depreciation,and Net Hook Value - Plant In Service (Cost W5, W5b, W5c, W5d, and Wye These sections allocate plant in service within each division to the three functional cost components. Plant in service data was obtained from Finance Department- records for fiscal year 1991. Fiscal years 1992 and 1993 projections were based on the most current department budgets and estimates. 5. Section 81 Return on Investment (ROI) To General Fund (Cost W5f) This section calculates the ROI due General Government on the basis of the value of net capital assets. Adjustments are made for contributed capital and water storage rights. An ROI rate of 6% is paid in 3.993 based on net investment as the end of fiscal year 1991. 6. Section 9a Wholesale Customer Allocations (Cost W5g) This section calculates the allocation of costs to f the two wholesale customers. It is considered appropriate to use the utility basis of cost allocation version the cash basis used for other customer classes. A description of the difference between the two methods is shown in Exhibit IIA. Coat allocated to wholesale customers is based on -11- "Ile relative shares of the water production plant and transmission asset values and projected revenues. Specific r.osts include a 9.15$ return on investment (cost of borrowing and risk premium), depreciation expense, and a 0 street rental fee. I I 7. Section 10: Summary of Revenue and Cost Allocations to Customer Classes Distribution (W1) This section summarizes the allocation of total coat and revenue to individual customer classes. Information is divided between sources and uses of funds and identifies the rate increase needed to cover total costs, 8. Section 11: Basis for allocating Extra Water Capacity to Customer Classes (Distribution W2) This section develops customer allocation percentages based on average and peak water usage load factors. Wholesale customer capacity allocations are based on peak demand as stated in contracts between the City of Denton and customer cities. 9. Section 121 Distribution of Units of Service to Customer Classes (Distribution W3a and W3b) This section illustrates the units of service: annual water volume, customer billings and meter costs. Volume usage and customer billings are summarized from consumption files. Extra capacity -12• a percentages are developed on schedule W2. Meter cost percentages are developed on the basis of total billings and relative costs by meter size using AWWA meter equivalent ratios. 10. Section 131 Distribution of Costa to Customer Classes (Distribution W4, W4a, W4b, W4f, wog) A. Total Water Costs (Distribution W4) This schedule summarizes the allocation of all component costs to customer class. These costs are divided into base costa-average day, extra capacity-maximum day, customer accounting costs, and customer meter costs. A. Average Daily Ease Costs (Distribution W4a) This schedule summarizes the allocation of average daily base costa to customer classes based on percentages of annual water volume usage. Expense categories are subdivided into costs that affect retail and wholesale customers, retail only, and wholesale only. C. Extra-Capacity Maximum Day Costs (Distribution W4b) This schedule allocates expense categories to retail and wholesale, retail, and wholesale customers on the basis of their percentage of total maximum day costs. -13- ~V 4 D. Customer Accounting Costs (Distribution W4f) This schedule allocates accounting and other administrative costs to each customer class based on the percentage of total annual billings. In the case of wholesale customers, additional costs were allocated based on the extra time and effort on the part of the utility staff and Customer Service to administer these contracts. Most of these costs relate to the operation of the Customer Service Division in the Finance Department. E. Customer Meter Costs (Distribution W4g) This section allocates costs to customer classes on the basis of the number of meters in service and the total cost of each meter by meter size. After discussions with City management, the methodology used to calculate extra-capacity costs for the Government customer clasp was changed. In fiscal year 1993, water will be provided to this class on an available, interruptable basis. This resulted in allocation of extra-capacity costs at the 1 average daily base percentage, effectively lowering the extra- capacity costs for the Government class. The overall rate increase required to cover allocated coats changed from 35.88W to 16.85. L4- 1 1 EXHIBIT II COST OF SERVICE PAGE SECTION 1. SUMMARY OF REVENUE AND 15 COST ALLOCATIONS (COST WI) SECTION 2. ALLOCATION OF DEPARTMENTAL 16-17 EXPENDITURES (COST W4a) SECTION 3. ALLOCATION OF NEW ADDITIONS 18-19 TO PLANT (COST W5a) SECTION 41 GROSS BOOK VALUE, DEPRECIATION 20-28 5,6,7 EXPENSE, ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND NET BOOK VALUE - PLANT IN SERVICE (COST W5, W5b, W5c, W5d,W5e) SECTION 8. RETURN ON INVESTMENT 29 (ROI) TO GENERAL FUND (COST W5f) low EXHIBIT II COST OF SERVICE (CONTINMD) PAGE 30.36 SECTION 9. WHOLESALE CUSTOMER ALLOCATIONS (COST W59) 37 SECTION 10. DISTRIBUTION OF UNITS OF SERVICE W1ASSES TO CUSTOMER (DISTRIBUTION 38 SECTION 11. DISTRIBUTIONOiASSES TO CUSTOMSR (DISTRIBUTION W2) 39-40 . DISTRIBUTION OF UNITS SECTION 17 STOMER OF SERVICE To UT ON W3a, W3b) CLASSES (D u 41.x5 UTION OF COSTS TO SECTION 13. CUSTTpBVIER CLASSES (DISTRIBUTION W49 W4a, W4b, WOf war) SECTION 1 RE~N~ ~ COST OF OCA•tjONS (COST WI) ALL i PI J_ R0916ex,W1Ct FhY DENTON MUNICIPAL. UTILITIES CCWF_Wt Wr"r COST OF SERVICE STUDY xe-ep-9z ALLOCATION TO RUNCIIONAL COMYONI:N7S A TER WMTEM t«1 + 'Um V•w Bll/q YHr B«• FxY• B•IIy A1Hr j-20" Ix e~3-93 h Cp KRy ALLO L'ASgN I e • BA61e SOl1RCRSOF t"ORKI O CAPITA + Bak of Water $12,174,646 x REVENUE RATE CHANGE 863,422 - s Subtotal $12,867,068 0%74. 9% T13.7% Be3,093 _ 776,070 9,834,603 1,766,216 1tz,esv.9tt er venues: _ Tap Fees _ $36000 fooA% 36.000 T~ YHr-RHdsd _ B Aid-In-Construc6an~ 50,000 _ 100.0% 60,000 ovr.rrunr e CoOform Analysis 20,000 f00.0% 20,000 Towrrre I Intarssl- ratlenc 03,000 _ 100.0% _ 93,000 _ _ tow ehM e Misce$aneousIncome 11,000 _ 100.0% _ 11,000 lowrbnt 9 Subtotal _ ;200,000 18,T% 60.3% 23.0% $36,000 _ $124,000 ffA,000 #99,0w to Total $13,088,068 --6R%1 8.2% 74.7% 13.9% ;683,083 ;810,070 ;5,766,b93 1,815,215 ha,we,vn USES OF WORRINO CAPITAL: o.eex 9.oxa, 9o.avA t0cwl orations Mania I 6,191.05E _ osrn v_xar 7.1 24% te,00% 100 0y% tt 7nce Services _ ;z,28i,1ee 0.9%72,1% 14.9% $20,601 f272,3et _$11630252 $337,072 s«c4a-wa w t2 _ 5171037 3,4% 68.1% 38.4% 828 17316 300,35S88,fi31 e•. coot-WN is d Power 678,207 b2.5X 47.7% - - 301,604 274,03 e« cost-w•A is - 941,646 0.3% 6.4% 91.3% 2,466 79,492 860,698 B« coet-Wa is _ Services 860,252 O.e% _ 2.3% 07,1% 6,348 10,872 - 834,032 _ Y' 46 Purchase of Water _ 191,022 40.6% 63,6% e» coot-w44 88,732 102,200 s« cost-wa v IrnUtanee 8 Sun kt! 36,825 0.6% 13.7% 48.4% 39.2% 279 _4,904 _ ie,ete 14,02e B« test-Wu is Bad _EXPIN e___ 86,000 _0.6% 7.6% 76,0% 16.9% 370 4,033 40,354 10,333 Aq. of Alt Ey •nd~er« +s lilts Rs Roberts Pmts 1,057 710 _ 100.0% _ 1 967,710 _ s« co AM » AdrNMstntlveTreemhts 848,682 100.0% 648,682 A-eut_A_oH.coete 21 Wholesale R01 09,535 47.6% 62,6% _ 28,182 31,173 a«coet-wy _ 22 ersd on III 23 Wholesale Street Rental 29,908, 0.1% 0.3% 70.3% 14.3%1,932 91 23,790 4,276 arse on R•vnu« 24 General Fund ROI - 6% 943,316 _ 29.1% 46.77% 26.2% 274 703 430,700 237 843 a« CeN-wee _ 26 Oifsetb Wtroksaie X4816 1.3% 0.3% 64.9% 43.6% 5738&1 _5482 180,314 53,647 ze subtotal =0,930,661 -7.6% 72.0% 1$878,436 _4.67 ?9 ;8,440499 $11473 e00 1e,9w,eea Det R Ca onwt _ Its e a et _ V For Rev. Debi ltS Fund _ $2 478,267 100.0% v 2,478,267 ct.e•e. Atq_osy 29 CtB••• A . o•y 20 FbtedAtuh 1092000 0,1% 8.4% 33.0% 66.8% _ --11250 0110 569,983 635,617 e••cs,i-wss » Wholscab Depreciation EBpens _ 67,558 47 4% 62.0% 24,048 27,322 e« cost-weg- 01-Bees Arq_ MyT _ $2 Repayment to Electric _ 600,000 T0.7% 0.0% 90.3% 3,390 46,120 461,600 ct. Bee•Aq.O•y 33 suLloml 4,122 226 0.1% 3.3% 80,4% 10.2% $4,630 $$35,370 3 3M,380 $668 &70 $4 j .122.22 x NET CNANOE81k W1C rAj,6% 76% 76.5% 16 0% _ Aqa Ni t;.nduu«'] WHOLE NETCHANOESIN W/C 4,082 06% 7.676.0% 16.0% 20 t-1 3,706 776 u WATER REVEHU°_ REQUREMEHT ,867,968 6.0% 74.9% 13,7% $68$083 _ $776,0,634,693 $1,78b,216 ltz.esr.97e 5,221 38 Revenue IncreaseNeeded•-> SAM 100% SECTION 2 ALLOCATION OF DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES (COST W4a) 1 i J V H661562M93 Fltil DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Coat-W44 COST OF SERVICE STUDY wr. zt _eop_02 Ai1•OCATlON TO F4INCTIONAL CONPD7113NTti ~ WATER BYSIEM QFPARTUFNT MOM irl Yew 6eMV Maer er• Eee• 8eke Mar --Aq. Ems. - -le92-6a Go•I6 Goa. AV, Day c+p.axy coax Cml. Ca a+ G.'. ty hLLOC. eAe16 Sudgel (A) (m_ (cl WA-flig A STRATIO 1 PsrsOnd 8ervlcss 2841,060 60% 90.0% :13,302 $13,302 {23,446 cl ` 8••• AgyOd x IWa 6,300 6.0% 6.0% 90,0% 416 _ _416 7,470 cl ` Bu. Avg. opy 6.0% 6__..0% 90.0% i c+ • !u. Aq, n.y~.._ 3 Purchased Power - ttbintanance _ 37, 100 6.0% 6.0% 90.0% 1,666 1,866 33,380 c+ 0-15-40 a Day_ 6 8enkes B4 600 6.0% 6.0%-90.0% 4,240 4240 76,320 0••/+. Ag. Ory . - 2,793 5 WA 6.0% 00.0% 140 140 2 614 cl • 8•+. Aq, o.Y s Insurance e,+. x 8undr 2,660 6.0% 90.0% 128 126 2,286 Cl • Awo.Y__. 3,000 6.0% 6 Q% 90.0% 160 160 _ 2,700 - Gf ° e,t•Aq. o~_._ x Fbred Assets _ y Total :104,693 6.0% _ 6.0% 90,0% :20,230 {20,230 X3!84134 ATRR PRODUC ON - 460: to Persontl8arvlces :706.9!7 52.3%- 47.7% _ _ :370,946 :337,872 o_Ago fMq-.,,f 11 Su Iles 418,43 0 52.3% _47,7% 217,W 196,631 P A!9 0 lMar CM 12 Purchased Power T 678,207 52.3% 4747% 301,504 274,703 0 • ,[+r lMw o _ fs 1Aslntanance 248,100 100.0% 248_100 a•E.u Av,p•~cmy kAs b96 761 100.0% 698"761 _ c° e... h..•a. 0.Y 14 sm^' - - _ to Purchased Water _ 191,022 48.6% 63.6% 66,732 102,280 0 • Aq c•y1M•" 08y is Wa1af R hb 1,967,710 _ 100.0% 1,967 710 G•BAt!Av~tp• p.Y 20 if tt Insurance t2,208 62,3% 477% 61388 6,021 0 • Avg ogfM..ca I G. B... AVr p, 100.0% p.0w gundry Ito Meld Asasho 63 000 27,733 26,287 0 • AM n•Yimm c.Y_ Totei =4780,348 80.2% 19.8% ~aB16,782 $044,684 U O - 4611 xt Pana1s18erMws $778663 100.0% _ X8,5/3 c+e u.AVC.o.y r 48,070 100.0% 46,070 c+s.u A~q.n a~ 100.0% _ yI- 664,149 Z! Purchamsoed Power T c•a... Aq, 0•y l a. 88aMefxarlce 684,148 100.0% 25 8eavkw 108,989 _ 100.0% - 106 888 _ G.e...A.e, o.y xs Insurance T 12,283 33.5% 68.0% 4,068 8,206 E ° Aq o•,aIM.. 0*tz 1000 100.0% 1,000 o•en.AVe.oe,, Bun - 1 303,760 • Aq o. v as Fhnd Asasls _ II 1 000 33.1% 641260 E yM.r H. y 1: 1 $2,429 963 %4.4% 26•tl% $1,604,608 ;822,466 12,42°,0.3 ATER O - 462' a.t ao Psrsunsi 8stNces >i 281 780 100,0% - =26t,%69 e• .t« ce.l+ 15,617 f-0ALW*W cool. of BuDPIW 18,617 10.0% - 62 Purchased Power _ B'cwtMa. cos 3s Wintmmmm _ 77 037 100.0% 77,037 e~cV•+ Ma• ce.l• M Servleaf 14524 100;0% 1 34,524 s•a+t Mow ceol. ow c 36 Irauranu _ 3 826 100.0% _ ,41x6 - s•a,lr_ M 1 000 _ 100.0% 1 000 ~ _ p° - Mav Ce41 ~_90~000 _ _ eucu.l Ma. O~. at Fbtad sets 90A00 100.0% 3 ch6H 36 Told $464,463 100.0% $454,48 RSrna.WK$ First DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES CASH WON COST OF SERVICE STUBY BASIS 21-Sip -l2 ALLOCATION TO FUNC'RONALCOMPONBNTS \ WATER SYBTEY Teel Ver 13" Motor Br. E,6'• Store Motor Aq. Eie81 _ l eel-e2 Costs Costs 1 Aq. O•y Cepsoly C•ste Cost. Cab Cep tc y ALLOC.---- l 6 BAB IB J IN (I fQ1 I01 IN __1OL WA 3 B O[ B NO - 46 : Ss Persond Brvlces _:146+973 6.0% _6.0% 90.0% $7,298 _$7,299 I131,378 Cl - Pot* Awgo.Y 4s Suppfln ,_8-250 5.0% - 5.0% 90.0% 413 413 7,426 Cs_Dole Avg CRY4 41 Purchased PoWer 5.0% 5.0% 90.011 CI . Boot AM Cry 42 i"tenu6ce 12,000 6.0% 5.0% 90.0% _ goo 000 10,800 cl • ea. Avg, ory - a Services w. 22,166 5.0% 5.0% 90.0% 1,100 1,108 t9,842 cl•_eneAvg. DRY M Insurance 220 5.0% _ 5.0% 90.0% 11 11 19E at . Base A%V. Coy u 13u~ 5.0% _ 6.0% 90.0% Ct - Bn•AW. DRY 6e Fbted A sels 22,000 6.0% 6.0% 90.0% 1 100 1,100 19,000 Cl . Ban My CRY 41 Total $210,601 6.0% 5.0% 80.0% $10,631 (-10i ,63 AT R LABOR TORY - 48 1 =189,641 48 PW$On3d 9rviCM $109,803 _ 100.0% $109,803 CI . BaseAw.Cry 40 Supplies _ ~w _ 21,470 100.0% 21,470 01 - Bass Avg. Day So Purchaled Power _100.0% _ ct . BneA 0 al hWnNnancs 6,180 100,0% _b,18o 01.Bu,Aw.CRY B2 Bemitim _ 32,120 100.031 322120 - cl eastAw Day sS Insurance 185 100.0% 185 _ CI - en6 Avg. o.Y M 8undr cl . 0406 Aw. Bey W V so FblsH1 fusels Total $t74,810 $174,808 _ a .ens Avg. ory I TO L My k Tot.l 57 Persons! Services _ 2,7el,1ee 0.9% 12.0% 72.1% 14.9% $20,001 $272,301 $1,030,262 __$337,972 $2,261,188 OR SUPPlks 5-17,037 0.2% 3.4% 50.1% 38.4% 828 17,346 300,334 196_631 617,039 is Ftifebased Power 578,207 _ $2.3% 47.7% 301,604 274,703 578,207 m mmirienance _ 941,545 0.3% 0.4% 91.3% 2.465 79,492 - 660,606 941,645 A n Serv3cee 850,262 0.6% 2.3% 97.1% 5,348 10,872 634032 859,252 n _ Purchased Water 191,022 48.5% 53.5% 69,7312 102,200 101,022 as Water q is _ T 1,057 710 100.0% _ 1 067 710 1,967,710 w Insurance 31276 0,5% 12.1% 42,8% 44.8% 151 `3,778 13,323 14,028 31,276 W Bun 4 560 2.6% 24.6% 72.4% _ 128 11128 3,296 4,651 a FtKSd Assess 1,092,090 0.17E 8.4% 33.0% _ 68.6% 1,250 _ 911260 369,963 039,617 1,092,000 n Total $6A 31 764 0.4% 5.8% 76.3% 16.0% _$001.761 _ $406,224 $0,348,703 $1,607L039 _$6,431,797 i'L T SECTION 3 Old OF ~W Al)DITIONS ALLO TU PLANT (COS'T` W5a) F'093:' eae¢192'WA3 Fhrr DENTON MUNICIPAL, UTILITIES Wooer COST OF SERVICE STUDY aD9r-w5a 17-sop-92 ALLOCATION TO NUN C71 ON AL COM PON EiN 1S IWE9IMENT IN WATER PLANT NODMON9 r0 PIANO rr1 PE3RCE3NTAOE35 CUS71DMI3R Year errnU AIe1r er: ~*r BAST3 low-641 Crer Cools AVp. Dw Capacity Co11ei 1fe11r A1'7. - Fa1• _ Co1h Coeh C.PrcIF/ -~KIS W ER AD UM RA O - 46 autS o I BuNdln 6 E_~111~men =2,000 100.0% tq_ FurnMre ixtres c=ore Awng1 on 100.0% 000 1900% C_0 Ar.nw91on E u moot 100.0% - C.Br. Awnp. Ow e Radb E II wart _ _ c.er•AV.nya Non Dept Fixed Ara c-are Avueee Dw 7 subtotal ater Touclb $3,000 c.er1 Avee 0- 460• 13,000 a BUNdInQ6 E ul inert $32_000 _ 62.3% 47,7% - e FurnNure 6 Fixtures 100_0% _ $16,744 $16,260 DAAve myNa. ory m Wks E moot` $2,000 100.6% - - c-Bmo Av"o Day n Simile & Brld s 1 - 2,000 - c•ar1 Av« aee Dry 1z _ IAachlnerY 6 E u 00.0% Y - _ 13 Radio Equipment 100.0% Caere Avlnyl Day u Miscellaneous E I 100.0% C.ar.Awned p2Y_- Is Water WeMe o-are Aso--raga 0r 523% 47.7% - of ,v+f I Ia Raw Water 8latbn 100.0% - 0 ° Aro DerN.. 0w _ H. rr Stara 0e De b/86u 62.3% 47.7% comer. Awr.e. Day 010 a Reservoirs R St. Pt 62.3% 47.7% - D`A.a'Dmt ow ra TurboOeneralin Un 62.3% 47.7% - - 0-AvgDarArrDay » Pum Motors Boo o - o. Mr o SP. 3% 17.7% ---D_L_ rr, 21 Pud}Icatbn 9 tam - 1400,000 62.3% 47,7% - 0 • An 0myNa Dw_ f 22 Watar Malin - 209,302 fG0 698 0 . Asp WrIIAa Dy - _ 2s Structures 61m ove 100.0% 100.0% C.Br1 Av/npi Cw rr subtotal ;434 52.5% 47.5% - - at Do -Ib o - 61046 $206,854 $431.000 as BUNINRY 3 Equl Rren 100,0% - - - sFurniture & Flxturaw _ 100.0% - - c•ar. Av/r.or ow m OHke Equipment _ 100.04E - _ c•pr/ Av"o O.Y 20 streets A Bat s 100.0% 0•Dre Av.r1e10 at Machiner & E ul 100.0% - - c. ere Avlner on a Radio E f marl 100.0% - c.ere Ave .p1 DOT $1 Mlscallarwoua E ul 30,000 76.0% 25,0% 0 _ cbnof rskm a Trarwmlaa. Water Me $104000 22,660 7,600 Dei of sylelm u Dlabibution WaMrM 787,000 33.1% 66,_-N% - _ 044,66Y _ 1,303,441 D. 100.0% %Wr Do tmal Nov M Water Mehra 767,000 a- B!!, Arergl D _ 33.1% 116,8% a Water drams $16,000 _ 100.0% D' Aw DrrNr b.y M Servbw 60 Opp _ 16,066 C.er1 AVI/pa 0 100.6% 50,000 y- w ar Irrolneraton 100.0% O.B-r.AVVnploy y Inter ceptorr/CoNecto _ 100;00%- c.erlAv.r_e1o~- a subtotal ;2,&7000 27^e%' 29.N% 46.3% - 787,000 $732,063 $1,310,841 tz,em goo 1 l COST-W5r DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES n9121112AKS fhd COST OF SERVICE STUDY Warr ALLOCATION TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONFNTS I7-9•G-2Q INVESTMET WAMANTER D?TIONS TO 940 CUSTOMHR _ HASR -_J 111117 l Tat pHR TAOFTS• euty r:1« b c~kiy - urn c. J Y•e Biwa M•1« a••• ~ywOY co•w cook Col BASIS J 190-93 co•w Cq6 Are. Dry C - 2A- at Me n 46n' 100.0% •o FwnXure i fixtures - - 100.0% - c•er• nr.rq• D•v 41 011104, ETLlpmeni 100.0%- - c•Br• Ar--~na• Cw- 42 Radio E I swot 100.0% B• CU.I.M.brca•b - a IAI_ icalarws Eq i 00,000 $90,000 100.0% C. Br• Avmr2• D•Y M ^ 1(~(a1- er Mat * 100.0% Wo.000 45 6arv IDN 00.9% $p0,900 - N subtotal $90,000 1 _ - - -~1`I - 31 a 100.0% 1---- - 0 C. am* A1.1.9, Coy c•Sw• AwnO• D•Y Furniture i Fixtures $1,000 , -21L000 47 F 190.0% _$22,000 $22,000 AB 01XCe lAachlne_ s- _ X21 X990 700_o% w subtoUl $22,000 _ _ - c•Bw• nr•n9• p•r - IN or Labe 10 - so' $16,000 _ 100,0% c•Sr• Aw Na Ow_ - w Bull-din i E IT =18000 Items - 100.0% c•Bw• Ar•.o• o y~ Si Furniture-_-i fixtuf 100.0% 9,000 C.UY. Ara.2•D,~ s2 of oMachines 100.0%-,- - Sr9,o99 Mlsca~l 9,990 - $19"000 i _ 500.0% 1u sublotal $19,000 ,.i-- _ c•ar• Ar«ro•-- d i tai 500.9% c.er•AV.r.2•D«l _ ys Darts Uttfa £kn - ~ RaY, Robert! _ - - _ *1,a9e,cao subtotal $677 000 $1 004,106 $_1_616 666 Total $3 968 00 26.6% 20.6% 44.6% w h r 1 t \I Re12102,WKS Fhel DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILPI-iES W1•r COST OF SERVICE STUDY 7-ssp e2 ALLOCAMNTOFUNCTIONALCOMPONENTS INVEATMENT IN WATER PUNT 111000VONe TO PIANO Tat PERCENTAGES COSTOMBR BASH Yer 11 0,112 Yetr 8r• prte 611e+2 YNei 1r12-01 Caeb Cab AW, 0.y 1+prly cash cash CA L% CQ Iy - AMC __-_-~A6I9 1 Water eterln - 4 0 e0 Furniture i Fixtures 100.0% c-eNe Avre2e Voy N OHlce Equipment 100.0% - C-But Av.+.26 ow 42 Radio Equipment _ 100.0% c.er. Awago Day _ 0 Mlscelianeous Equip $00.0% c•ereAver.2•o•y _ H Water Motors =60,000 100.0% 80,000 e.cust Yebr cc.b u Bervkr - 100.0% c•eN6 Avem2s0 _ subtotal $00,000 100.0% at Enginewing - 63• _ c=ors Ave pe o.y a Furniture i Fixtures 41 000 _ 100.0% $sc)(0) w Office Machines subtotal 222,000 u 100.0%~ c •er• AV*--* Water Labors o - 460• 50 BYNdlny i E ui men $10,000 100.0% - =t8 000 _ -B "a Ave --rage 00y r1 Furniture k Fixtures 100.0% c•sr• Avereee oey_ u Office Atexshinw _100.0% c.eNe Averye o.y 1 ea MletaYaMOUe E ui 3,000 100.0% 3,000 c-ere Awre2e o._ f ~ er sublodl (<16 000 100.0%. . - - 16,000 rl__ f ~O N Oarza Uttd Ekn - - T 100.0% - - ceer• AVwNs 00@L se RayRobard 100.0% n ea tuWotal a.er• Avw.ee y be Tota1L3,366,000 _26.6% 26 6% 44.a% $077,000 $1,004,106 _=1,610 666 f,,oae,ooo SECTION 4,5,6, & 7 GROSS BOOK VALUE, DEPRECIATION EXPENSE ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION, AND NET BOOK VALUE PLANT IN SERVICE (COST W5b, W5c, W5D, AND W5e) a cos r-Ivs Wale COST OF SERVICE STUDY 6~wy 1 -Bp-1e ALLOCATION TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS INVEATMENT IN WATER PLANT (NETBPCK VALUE) B UX4M flV T"I PERCENT OES CUSTOMI3R EASl3 Yom _ 8111p U* Erta "I" YNr An, Dta 11,02-93 1-0. vow My Dal' CpacNy Ce1b C41h, ^444 Capaa My n m a 1. 1- fn (A fin 4ao Water Adminidratlon;3ae,see o% ~3e8,oata Y~ F 100 4eo Water Production 6,697,371 V 571.0% ^42.4% 3,802,366 2,%66,9141 461 Water Distribution 17,%71,724 46.7% 29.3% 2b.aYT-7,898,190 5,065.8421 4,398,86 28,02 4BZ Waier Metering f 40,302 91.8%I 8.2 312,275 413 Water Engineering 30,762-__ jN100.0% 30,782 4so Water laboratory 102,626_- 100.0% 102,62e Q L ,736,636---l Water Rights 64,736,436 100.0% Total f =79,477,00 10.3% 80.%% 8.9% :8,206,445 $54,163,839 1!7,104,706 F '7 24,70.371 I~ 1 4gt: tirV b WrN DENTON MUNICIPAL. WITLIU S +r- COST OF SERVICE STUDY COST-wsn •w 'A, ALLOCATION TO FUNCTIONAL C INVESTMENT IN WATEH PLAN~YCIN~N (GROSS DOCK VALUE) Test PAItC NTACi$S L IISTUMAR Y•i erlyti MNK BN• E.f. ST11p MMK AAS13 66a`w Cab fw •b Ave, Dy Cp •oIH C•.b Aro. Ezt• C••b Ce•4 C~pNi Wals dnIwo at 1- 6 ry utn`c. 801 & Elul It me $462 -5 - BAAIB - a FUrnkuro & Flxturee 100.0% -V `$462,4a6 • Offkw 08 068 100.0% - - - c.BN. Avn9• o.y-_ E Mont $138,f96 100,6% 68,086 a.B _ N•AVnB.Ow- 4 Stare E u ment- ;14,774 100.0% !38,196 c.eN• Av.nq• o a Radio EOLLIDment $0 762 1 4,774 _ _ - c^e N. Avr.B• o,y e Non Dspt Fiwed Ass ,;I,ao - - 1f000o.o.0% % r x`,762 c.eN• Avrp• o subtotal 68211311 0,040 _ c.BN. af•r Productlo 160.0% $ ,318 mq. Dy - 480 98P Av. s Building & E I men - - _ 1662.41° QU p,__ j_ 8,078,804 • FutnNure & Fixtures $24,364 - $3,179__619 to Office $2,886,688 o_Aw o.yn1.. D Office EaulDment _ 000,0% $20,66.1 _ I t 100.0% - me .~v Awnn•C,y Streets rfdoea $16,477 _20,_6464 - c.BN•Av• I' _ MBnhlner 8 E co o.y _ ul m $638,221 :41 100.0% C.B"Av_:409 Day Rad LO E4 _lpment j31 849 - - - 638,221 .BN. AV• _ Allecellaneous E Ui - 100.0% 31,88 c mg• Loy IB - $338,926 9 100.00% - ~B. D _ C.BN•A1 y Water WaNs $446 062 62.3% _ 47,7% 336,928 c.Bw AI - D y IB Raw Wate8lallon E $ 9 B63 100,0% 232882 212,190 0 . AVU Dar,Atu o.y !J +a Stara Da dJetr $43 341 - 108,683 62.3% 47.7% ew Avnp. o Reservoirs j,%- 4 81. PI ;781 N - 4 62.3% 47.-' ?2,E78 20,662 0. A o. Ma o. . 16 Turbo Deneratln Un - - - 409,18183 _ 20 62.3% . 41,7% 372,811 0. AvB Om VIM oy_ PUM , Motors, Boo -$302-888 21 -Purification OVStem 16,40 62.3% 47.7% _ -190,779 0-AnOmyMwoy IIIIII $1,9 _ as W 62.3% 47.7% 172000 0. AV ;,IIIO y /Water Mains =213,460 - 100.0% 1,002,967 -813,632 0 » Aro o.yMn oy x+ Stlucture• 4fm rovo j48 243,460 _ 100.0% AvHp• 0•y zr subtotal $11~111 62,131 56.4% 44,8%- _ 46 i• W er Distd Ut -401, $9,124,112 $1,928,318 lu,os a..ao 2a DUNdIn 4 E-quljrmen $1,732,15t 26 Fui MUre 4 Firluree ;6218 100.0% - $1 732,619 V. oy 27 Office 10!M.o L --i 6,21 8 0-11"s A~+N. E ~~ment $19,586 m Streets 8 ed s $18, 100.0% crtBM•AV•r.B•Day d0s712 - 19,560 c.BNe Ay 0- $29.687 a• Machinery 4 E v m 100'0% 48,742 60 Radio E I Mont - - 100.0% c.BN• AvnB• oy _;II,OflB 100.0% - _-29 687 c.eN•Avn.B• oy 61 MI•cellaneaw E ui ;93,916 75.0% 4,069 _ c.BN6AV• 32 TransMlu. Watx Ma 10,671 83 25.0% 82,937 - oy-- _ 33.1% 66.9% 20,979 m D•vpm of 91 DisMlwtbn Wafer M 111,112.920,4f 100.0% 3 631,066 7,140,676 0 . Ar• c.yM" Now s. WaterMefera $6,116 12,826,417 - 36 Water drams - 33.1% 06.9% - c.eN• AVK.B. aff $440 969 66 Services 2833,44 100.0% 440 0 9 y 3 6240. AA oa Mw Dy 959 67 Incirwralors 100.0% _ 2433 O.BN• Avrp• 66 ~lnta =4 061 100.0% - a" _ D.e«• AVN.B• oy fon10o6ecto $1,361 385 _ 100.00% - _ 4,Oaf o.eN.A~•.a s• subtotal 3o 097,37 •o.y _ 47.1% _ !1361,386 28.1% 23.6% >i14~177,602 ;8,754,393 ;7,185,181 po,wrsae .rw•wl~ aeexlc2ww FNM DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES cosr-wen Wow COST OF SERVICE STUDY 17 - Sep -92 ALLOCATION TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS INVESTMENT IN WATER PLANT NNISS BOCfr NILUE) ~ Tat _ eRCNTA61S G'USTOMHR 8 SB _ yow B11p M•iw so0 FAt• milky Now Avp. EAa 1 11 lsex-p Cosh Cast Avg. 13W C°p•oNy Co1F Cosb Costs csOwRy --_^ALIOC.i~ a,de•1 room IW f.1 fA fY ,a _ °ABIB Wat ate 62: 40 Furnitufs i Fixtures ;1,746 f00.0% _11,746 a-eue Avrp• oq n Office Equipment ;667 _ 100.0% u 087 c=e..• A••r.e. on 42 Radio Equipment ;16,210 100.0% 18 210 c=BM• Av•rw. o.y 41 Miscellaneous E I ;17,620 100.0% 17,820 CnBr•AVrp•Day w Watw Meters ;2,038,79 100.0% Y2,038,70 _ B-CuaL Mots, Costs 45 Services ;7,110 100.0% _ 7,110 C=Bu. Avap•oy~ w subtotal ;2,002,173 87.9% 2.1% 12.082,114 W w F ewln - 63' 47 Fur IT Kure 6 Fixtures _;16,66,4 100.0% _ ;18,964 C°e.•• Average ow 40 office Machines ;24 726 100.0% 24,726 c..--- BM• Avsr•OS may _ 40 subtotal 41,679 100.0% ;41,978 - N1,5Ta Ww1w Labufalo - 4110• 50 BuNonj.rk E~dpmer ;79,206 - 100.9% _;79,206 C_=BU• AVnW Day _ 31 FurnBufs 3 Fixtures ;10,017 100.0% 10,017 _ C-flue Average Day 52 iOffla Machines ;1903 100.0% 4,903 C=Bo•Avrr.a• Day _ N SS MlsceMfnecus E i ;16 186 _ _ 100.0% 16,186 C!!B_.•• Avrnos Day i 34 subtotal ;t1f,311 100.0% $119,3t1 _ $115.311 11 - 5s Qafza tJ the Ekes ;260,064 - 100.0% ;290,064 C°Ba• Avnar Ory I 5e Robwts ;67,097.00 100.0 A Jl._ ;67 9 7,084 c°Bwl AVOf 7347.06, ST subfnlal $57,341 $6 ,06-1~-- 5e Totd rt10141a 26t Il I 16A5ri 72.1% 11,9% -~1f1,218,601 ;73,108,1 b2~12,093,49r,1 1101,413x52 BASES FOR ALMOA710RJ: A+ Cu•lom•f ApcouAlq C0116. Tobs r•cov 6d Yam minMvn bfl. B. Cfsle,nsr M#tw Cests.Tobsrscovw•d sommlmsmu bit c. Bue Avraa• O°y . To be r•cowrd Yen avw°ss momhy wl,m• ud. Da Msah s OW b Awrfes Day Ratio. To be leowsred Yom f►Hly oh+ra• or ooMenM pod, volume fols, E. MnHm HaurioAwraas Day Rohe. Toberswwfd fiwn faclllychwas a losemolpook wWnsr•Ns F. N ;tlM sowdlre b M• o•gMd ayMta• 01 N OUIa 0014. Caplal Afsoalbms: Avnas dwV ler•ces1-s 11.03 mad ON Isms. 40111% e•ray fo41er Weasel 1.36 mod 0.11 Ones Sal% TOW dsfy loraoest- 12,41 mad 1.00 am•s 52.33% Madnw tlry Nosiest- 23.72 mad 1.61 tsnss 47.67% foe Aoductlon P•dl NxaRFersaMl° 37.51 mad 0.02 flues 64,61% For01•YbJbn (Whom IN LAFM, book 14 Wed. dyf•clabom rviMr Vim IM•d Movie, N 14bcald 10 cost componm U) i R0211a.Wrc/ FhN DPNTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ~ WATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY cosr-wsr AI. LO C:ATI ON 11) PUN C77 ON AI. COM PON RN T vs INYEEIMENT IN WATER PANT (DEPRECN FM EXPEN8q Tat PERCHNTAOF.3 (:UST)MBR BASE Yu ache MN,v Bllhe M;i lent-W ce as Gtr Argrpy C•P•eNy (;Oslo Gtr costs Ate' c ,panN E>t♦costs .uioc or ninistr a ion- 60 eLMis t BuNdlrtg i E. q< Prr men $0,230 100.0% x Furniture d Fixtures 15007 8,230 1 .0% c.Ar• Avsr.e• o.y 00 5,907 l a OfRa_ Eau m lpant (3,260 100_0% C.ew An c- nsa.oy Store E u ment $1,477 _ 100.0% C.er• AV.ne• Oy - e Radio E i ment $178 1,477 C.er• - M•r•q, 0y 100,0% 876 e - Non De t Fixed Ana 100 0% - c.er• Avrao oy 2 subt0tei (20,639 100.0% c»ar.Avr.o -0 -4y Water roductio - 0. f20, 639 Rxo,ero e -CcNnJ i EquI me $121,212 62,3% _ 47.7% n Furniture 6 Fixtures $2,136 100.0% _ 2$63,,438 42b $67,787 D .Ave o. Ma 0•-- y to Office Equipment -__$3,831 100.0% - _ c=er. Awr•e• o.y 11 _ Streate 8 Brfd a $1,648 - _-31831_ c. Br, Anrp, p•y_ 100.0% 1,848 - - Iz Mschlner 9 E ul m f - c+ar• Av 93,922 100.0% - !w• 0y 83,822 11 Radio E ul mant $3.189 ON, - C'-Av. - DRY Ia Mlscelerreoua E W cy6r, Awr•e• D.y le water We No - - 52.3% 100.0% ` _ - - c.■r - Av F!n• Day re Rsw Water Station E ^ $6,493 47.7% $00.0% g • Are D.yMc• o.y (N 17 st^or■pe Depo to/8tru $087 - 6 493 c.e~ Arne. Dsy - I Reservoirs 6 St. PI - - 62.3% __47.7% 164 413 D -AM o. I 62.3% 47.7% rM•xp.y- ro Turbo Generating Un 62.3% 47.7% - - AM ptyA!%x Dry 2C Pum ,Moors Boo - 62.3% 47.7% - o'Are o•rM-°pW___ 21 Purification stem $65841 62.3% o -Avg DAYM•r Cy "`47,7% 22 Water Mains $12,173 _44`017 40,824 0 - Avg DA Mu Dy as Structures A 1m rove - _.I 00.0% 12,173 $1 _ 100.0% - c.6«•Avre2.Dty 24 tuhtotal $300 913 17.0% 33.0% - 1 er at bulb $201,189 $99124 uoo,e+s 21 BUNtill na a E I n 3~4 150 - - 100.0% - - 2s Furniture i F11' lures 622 - 100,0% 34,/60 - Cc^er, AvrAe, o•y_ _ 77 Office E ment $3,913 622 _ C.Br. M•ne. OH _ 100,0% M Btraets 8 edd9ss $4874 _ 100.0% 3,913 - C.BM• Ar•r•e• oy 29 MaChlner &E u _ $2,069 - 100.0% 4,974 0.6 e,AveA - x Radio Equipment $4409 _ 100.0% _2969 J c-Bw Awrp. Dy 11 Miscellaneous E 1 $1,692 4,409 _ c.■rs AV", Dy 12 Tnnsnll■s. Water Me $491,192 76.0% 26A% 6119 1,723 _ - ervt«n _ 33,1% 08.9% - - as Distribution Water M $621,640 - ___L 0,438 324,443 D0u.trnel Are Dy M. Nov 100.0% ~ ~ 021,848 k Water Metsn $271 33.1% 81.9% _ e.6r, M•ne• D.~ y _ Water drants $21,173 - - 100.0% BO 191 o.MQ04YMu 1 se 8ervloes - - 21,673 $140443 100.0% O.er• AwrAe• Dy 31 Incinstaton 14 401 0,443 c.■r. AY *L Day _ 100.0% as Interc6ptors/Cokeclo 876 19 100.00% c.nrA Morass p•y- 39 _ .80,216 3708,647 -.647 subtotal $1,396,108 48.4% 2712% -••23,4% 899,216 !;328,347 R8e2112.Wlb fhal DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES cvsr-we. Wi1ir COST OF SERVICE STUDY 1 r `B1R -9a ALLOCATION TO FUNCn ON Al. COM PON RN TS INVESTMENT IN WATER P{ANT MEPRECN VON EXMR$0 Test RCRNTA ES CUSIXOMRR RASE V•r Blthp MNr er. Exfi costs MNr Are. Esf - 101a-q CefM Gott, Ma, D•Y cfprlry costs coati CK "n.By AllAO.- :3 dA ate Metering - 4B ' OASIS a Furniture 6 Fixtures _ =176 100.0% - - OlifcoE Inept 1176 c C•Br•AYSr.a•D.y 234 l000% 34 C.". AV.na.11 Rodb EquI Mnent _ t1 821 _ 100.0% ` 1,821 N MlscaRaneous ;1 782 _ - - r'o'Ory 1(10.0% Y 1 782 M Water Motors 100.0% C•Brs Av pp 890 - c•Br• Av.r.a• Dy 99,890 11-cmat Motor Cosh H Servloae ;366 100.0% _ 366 e6r• Mena• D M subtotaf t10 3A836 98.2% 3.B% ry t99,890 ;3,817 1107.677 ~f-w-mer EnBfnaerln - 483 4r I FwnRUre t FI#wae $1!35 100.0% a fL_____lx Meohlrwe _ ;2846 - _ 31,836 c..er. Av.r.ys o.y 100.0 subtotal - - % _ 2,646 c.e^. AYn.o.D_.y__11 t4,.480 +e _ 100.0% 11, 480 - WAj!j Laboratory -4$0. H.~rw GO Building i F. I n _,t 1,424 W _ 100.0% 11,424 - VC-9.0 Arel FwnMure 6 Fbtures 11,802 00.0% u Of k,e Machines 00.0% M.r.af D•y Mlecegrwous Ei 00- 0076 1,389 AV. x subtotal i63h Vie. e"r _ Water !e: 000% ;6,378 - Qarxa Uttle Elm _ 6,001 Rapy 100_0% -_;6,001 -00 C•BW Av . 0 H Aaberb t6 7Q970 ss 100.0% _ R7 0,B70 _ c.ar. Av.r.e, D e~ subtotal ;676,971 100.0% - 6.971-_ Totd2,406,92gI 32.8% 49.6% 17.75f11 ~1 ;788,906 t1,5B1649 142647111 k..es,us BA80 FOR ALtOCATIONe: , A• p.1.hmN Aoeounltra CoR.,lob.f•cevrd for.ImNIm1A1 b1I. B• Cu.lrn•r MNr COWTeb•f•covr•d famminlnun bel C• BW Avrpo Oy . fo b• f•conr.d pram wrae• monvity whm• md. D• MoMaxT O•'Y MAWN000sy Raab. Tob.lnWond fan foclYly Maryo rfwonM R.da vlunrrr•s. E• Mr.nt Hoes, Is Avsrfp. DsY Rrb, TO b•r•av+rwt hap l.c111y Mry.r.rfon.lp•rk wfun•rsa.. F. AIMeN•d ecc0041re M W r.M10sd Russo ot.lo%h$, cosh. Gpl.pNbca4NV; Aymms d•Iyfer.crt• 1180 ftod e story hobr la•crlr 1.11 mad 0.11 R[has n•f 1l.et% fsW dsiy /a•ort• 12.41 1.0111 rlrtnun d lor•cust• ~ 1.00 th•. u,0 rsab "b Ivlof.coel. 337..1 ~d ~ 1.91 b,.01 p2 tf *nns.. s Se07.1.0711% % % Fa Di INN 4loFarsk on J bn IWIrnM MOdybA.Y hu.sd, dlpnahBort rrhr wsn fksd r.•t•, 1. abuhd Mc•d calpon•n1.) l k 1 1 n612192.Wlu rl,r DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COar-WSd ` wow COST OF SERVICE STUDY \ 17-9113-12 ALLOCATION TO 1t1NC71ONAL COMPONENTS INY[BTim emy IN WATER PLANT NCCUWIATFD DEPAECN r1ON1 eat _ PSRCHN TAOBS CUSTOMER _ BA SR Mp. E*Y• Wr 811h2 MNr Bat E*0 ■llh■ NOW Co•b Co•b AvB. b.Y CRrMy C40% Coate C441. C4r°Y °Y BAe le IB■2_pf W w A 6 ■tratio - 60' _ - - - - I Building R Equlpmen 077,518 100.0% 077,b18 c•Br• AvrPB• Dwy _ x Furniture R Fhdures S60,4 98 100.0% 60,488 !T-_ D•Brt Avr•e•.D.y- a Office E ul ment (1361196 100.0% 438 198 - c.er. Ave.B• Day storo E u men! 012,670 100.0% 12,870 D.B.•• A•.r.a. D.y a Radio E I wd 03,730 10010% 3,730 C•Bw• AvrPB• DRY e Non Dept Fixed Aa■ $1,040, 100.0% _ 1,040 c•■at• Av•nge OPY - 7 subtotal $203,6491 100.0% - 0263,850 $233.65D Water A oduc Ion - 460' B BuNding R Fqul men 0737,704 52.J% 47.7% 0368,008 $351,698 ° Aw °•ynM.r o.y - s FufnNure R Flxtures $12,369 100.0% 12,368 c•Br• Avrs• D.y 50 office rnent 010,961 T 10010% 10,961 cw6_r• Avrw• D.Y-_- n 8tratB R Bddge~ _ !4,619 100.0% W 4,658 C•e.•. Ar•r.B• D.y 12 _ Macachinry R Egul m 0216,232 100.0% 218,232 C=Bw Avnp. Dq----_ _ u EquiQrrrnt 026,988 100.0% _ - 28,988 o•er• Av.reo. DW Radio 14 _ !a e Mlscelm*ous Equip 0338,928 - 100.0% 338,928 C•Br• Ayr.■. D.r IB Watar WeNs 0446,062 - -62.3% 47.7% -232~BB2 212,190 ° -Avg Nm °•y u Raw Water etallun E 018,18 100.0% 10,418 C.er• Avr.B• Ow r~I 57 etOla De blBtr 06,852 621% 47.7% 3,686 3,287 D = Avg D•yNa o.y lj1 0761,994 52.3% 47.7% 409,183 372,611 D - Ava D•y/Mm Day } eI I! Reurvotrs R 8t. PI i U Turbo Ocnelating Un 62.3% 47.7% o -Avg myN..o.y 20 Pum a Motors 8001 0362,668 52.3% 47.7% 189,778__j72,9 09 D -Avg D• m-~ ° z1 PudHcalion 8 tom =1,429,497 62,3% 47.7% 747,983 041,50 4 0 - Aw my N r DPy 2y 84 744 T- c•ar. Avrp• D.y~ u Water Matra 064,7M _ 100.0% 81n7eturas R Improve 06 100.0% 21 subtotal $4,456.00 62.1% 47.0% 02,321 766 02,133"306 H..rs.oeo Waller Dlablbu ton - 48 ' _ - - - - 25 Bu6ding R E ul men 935,466 100.0% 0936,468 CwBY. AYWM6 D.y z. Fufnkwe R FlxtwN 2,323 100,0% 2.3323 _ C•er• Lnge o.y 27 office E fnent 12,297 100,0% ,?2,297 a•BrP AxK.s. o.y 21 ,,tfeMs R Bd ■ _ 12,166 - 100.0% 12,166 C•Br. Ar•fs■• Dq_ 20 ner • Eu 18,977 100.0% 18,977 c.Br• Avr.a• ° Machi m 21 Radio Etlul ent 21 132 100.0% ,132 c.ew AvrPe• Day a1 MlsuNsMOUe E I 16,742 _ 75.6% 26.0% 12,567 4,186 w.■noli se Trwomise, Watw Ma 4,280 662 33.1% 08.6% _ 1,409,741 2,860,810 D • Avg 04yNr Nov N DstribuWn Water M 6,049,093 _ 100.0% 6,849,093 were rwr.B. °•yJ J >w Water Melem 737 33.1% 68.9% 244 493 D -Avg °1YNbrow _ y Water 'r,Ydranb v 173,167 100.0% _ 1731167 o•Br. Arne. D a, tiarvkec 1,007,7tl1 100.0% _ 1,087761 0.er.AVnBPONY a7 incinerator 2_,040 10010% _ 2,640 C.er• Av•rog• OIa__ N Inleri faJCoNecto 432 519 432,619 subtotal ~12,826_B6 59.0% 8% 22.3% __06,281,852 _ =3,686,663 02,866,189 f1z,B2.,es• al 1 C09T-WSd ~ DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILI'IiES COST OF SERYIGE STUDY e94x1 a2wKd FhJ /aLLOCA'iONTO PINION Xi, co [PONBNV; A1tA r1N41 rE0 Dk7AEGN 17DM) wow en N cu ~1 1r-W- Cl1S'f't)M"5t Fxv. µlno'. MNI6 ~,y c4prxY aAeI YttltcYl4TAOFS~ enhe CO,p ' er1 .oxY Gs1Y - yo t 911he wC6N.M Ave D4Y r p~BW. A~InY.IOW _ calls 2 1H2-49 :84 _ 100 0% 667 claw. Av1 der GI n - 46 Y 6,406 $612 100_0% _ cer.__A~.'D' Dlt- BawN.wH.I;o.a._..-- Furolture k FIIAurea 3667 ` - +146 40 41 01~ Ike 4u t - =y0 _ 100.04E 1_726624 C --!A .-Ma. oh' _ pad40 E ul ment - t ,616 _ - - 11 d4 .six 42 E } t4- 126 71' J f11i,3'►6 - 44 Mlece6aneoua 31,720,624 100.0% 26,524 o.v 44 Water Me{arsJ- =1 616 1;ervkM l- ,7ti6 _ c•xr1 AV.no 4S 1 741,67 3e subtotal = 4;042 Ie _ 3• 100.0% =46,746 Star En "of ~ =0.766 _ -100.0% furnHure a FIIAurea ~4 012 r.B"s cechiMa 4r dt{ $3,346 Av! M a subtutal 3,037 u 100,0% Aa!pUW Wer $3 MIS 2, 100,0% o~- 60 1luY is nQ -E- u9~n 13,637 100._0'/. _ -,107 tl.7e6 FI Wurea J 112706 61 furnii i 12,491 100.0% ° p1tY.s " ceer_~. A.v...._ no' w Machtnee 3 101 100,0% N ,766 00 3200,061 .Br. Av~n?• ow E ul 312 subtotal 2,411,376" 12,611;uD MIS subtotal ONa .0% - RI 1a: 1200, 661 326 11,426, I r--t - Glaa'eS UHb - 32 41/,37 100.0% _ 136 : 96 44,3tD 14,98_8,794 Rey pobelts 611,429 ,O Q0, 30 aublotal 1?,__-. 6t FaA ~ 36.6% 16-8% 21,941,24 4I'MUT1 li. bu. T01a1 = µ1pCA110w8' Cu1km Coal. tab. Iwr 4an n1lnMUn bl volu0* u11donJ Pax voli+ufi IJr. 60 A+e c,.,.,or MAW Ca 1. 1eb.rKO~od to Weg1 ma* iK111V Jio61 a 1... a° Br, Av~W. oM. To b. ncoMnd job# rr Wead xfim lrHlY~W~ar~1a+11Dac C~ to AW1101 D- Ado' 4631% MMM D+Y 1, Avhb1 W AJb. T....a. I,& cM,r cold. O,4e IM61 6.41% M,VW E• Ic,prdin7 b F. wNDa3p11.06 nod 0.11 tonal 6262% Fa IYCd"U" - "12 1767% F NM Av.l+es dJM twoo"to 12i/ Dqmad d V.0 1"41 Mol% Fa DUYbu1b^ , tlnrl NbclAbn~: jsW do" Hr's l+ 23.12 mad 4 2 C.D141 3151 ~ to cost caiPOnadA MaMad do lwo Is n IWd roNt. N JboNal M+I }I*WW ra13M 14 N used. d10/ocwUOn rJ}MI F (W Mn F. 1xrb oO* 1 I i 1 R6e2110.W1t3 Final DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILI'IIIJS C0er-W3d WAO COST CF SERVICE STUDY ' 17-s•p-Ax ALLOCATION TO FUNCTIONAL COM PON11 NIS IWEATMENT IN WATER PLANT 14ccUMUTA TED OEPREC14 ROM Tess PRRCUNTAGE _ 2ST0 BR RASf3 Y•K Rllhe MstK 6Y• E t. a11ty mot" Avp. Fata _ 11►2-W Coib Coeb Ava0ey CpatiM Cesb Doeb Cost CapaRy - 9Aei IN in Im I- stowr Mete n - 461 4d Furne urs i Fixtures $6l2 100.0% _ $612 claw Awroa• DAY Office Equipment- 0887 - 100.0% 867 0-9a• Awns. OW - 42 Rs4' T E ul ment $e,406 _ 100.0% C-aa•Av •Dot 49 r:,ueeerteo us E ul =4,128 10_0.0% 4,126 - - 0-11me Averaas Day - 4e Wale(MateTa $1,726,524 1n0.0% - 1,728,524 B.CU•I. M•ter CC•b... u Ramose $1,616 100.0% .-u1.516 c-Dame Awr4le DW_ 44 eubtolal =1,741,672 _ 80.1% 0.9% $1,728,524 $15.348 11,741 a 77 w er En Inswin - 63• --T_ i 47 Furniture 8 Flxlures moo $6,760 o-are Avraa• D.y_ 4e Office Mach lives 4,042 4,042 c.ea•AVrwe0•Y 40 blolal 10,790 10.7H rto.na weer f.aborsto - 480:_ - --1 w 6u0Gn0 6 E1LI11prTwn 100.0% - L $3.346 _ C-9ae Av.r•ae el FurnHura 6 Flrtwes $3y637 _ _ 100.0% 3,e37 C•Bw Awrps DW .0% 2,4 D7 c•ar•Awr•ae DW _ S2 Office Machines 100 N 6y 1.11aca Meneous E i _=3,507 100.0% _ 3,107 c-6a•Av.ry•n.y__ 54 subtotal $12,786 100.0% :12,786 {I2, tee Water RI h s: _ 65 _ Garza Llitk EMTI $200 061 - fflD(O 1;200,061 C.aa• A_ R Roberta-:2.411,37 2 411,376 c•D.4•_Awr D subtotal $2,611,42 -2,811.4429 ^-t2,6n,4zu 66 Totals $21,941,24 _ 38.6% 40.6% 22.7% $e, 008,136 $8,944,31pL $4,966,79 621,041.240 e AeF9 FOR AIwCAT10N& A- cu•1an1l Att0Vr4n0 Cola 101,11KAVK•d k",ptntnmI bit. a. trtvganu Mail, Calc lobs r4oavw6d taemOrmi bit C. aa• Avorw Day - Tobs r•tewnd tan ways monIhVWI rls wed. D. Matnum Day to Awr1e• OW R•No. Tob• r•cw•nd tan ta11"y umma or s•aondp• k volane nl•r. E- Matnun Hour b Awrle• DAY R41br lobs noowred kom%C111Y 08110 or 1601MAlpsd, valum•rahw. 1. f4local•d stcadlra 1o Via WI2404 warps 0101 om•r 06sb. O.eO Itnsr 46,65% cpW movotone: Aveaas dWty lalcrt. 119] mei e Mrly new wetal- 1.96 riled 0.11 t6ner 6.11% Tow da H w" al- 11.41 fried 1,06 ttnee 52.9.% Mu VA" dWtastaal- 23.72 mad 1,41 *1166 47.11% Fw Producbon P•d1 14"I11706cssl- 9F.61 mad 3.02 afro, 66.01% Fa DOWAlon (When ah• dldY buN Is used, drpr•obuon rMher hti lk•d wsdr. Is Nbcalod to 00.1 eofrponnb.) h DE+NTON MUNICIPAL UTILITTI?S cost-we. ~ Raextaz.wru r1,.r COST OF SERVICE STUDY wSwr ALLOCATION TO NUN CTi ON AI, COM PO N RN TS tr'SM -tl IMyEeMENT IN WATER HART p/frBOOK VALUE) Tvl p13RCHNTAGHS _ CUSTOM HR BASH _a - 1011y1p M•I.r B0• FaY•- allro M.l.r Avg, KIOC. crowns 00.17 co.t. 00.17 clp.clry . r1m-W Go.t. C•.Y A.a.14 fiASle rater Ad balior - 60: 100.0% - _q3 BuMdin E ! . Dw _ t i 1384 072 _ 0.er. AWM # Pw Store c.e0• Av.r.a 100.0% 2 Furnhufa & Fildures , #8,671 100A% O.S"1 Ave-go DRY a Office Equipment _ 100.0% 0.100. Av.r.a. prr- • Equipment 12,104 100,tl% c.Sr. Aceraa• awa Radio E I ent -!3,022 c=ea. Aw.a. Dry e 100.0% UMAN subtotal #3991666 _ 100.0% - - We a roduntbn - 460 62.3% - 17.7% 12,793,611 _ #2.616,280 D = Avg DaYAJ.x D.y 0 ° BY. Awrp t O.y e Bufldln9 Equlprnen #5338,900 12,006 - 9,03 c.em Aveea. Dw_-- o Furnfure 6 Flxturea 112,005 7 t #9 1 o0.0 % - to Office Sui mon,703 113 c=B0. Memo. u.y 68 421,989 c=Sr.Awrweb.y rl Streets t.Brid a #13,8 IOOA% 00 - 1421,9±9 4,001 P=Br. Awnae 00y rs Machiner bKip m 1.0% 0.er1 Av brace +J u Radio E of molt 100.0 4 '00.0% ' _ u Miscellaneous E ul _ 62.3% _ 47.7% D=AwD.ym"Opy is Water WON$ - - - 100-„_0% - 93,445 _ d32 v RawWater Station E #93,446 62.3% 47.7% 19,093 7o`Avp D.PM Lt DLy #8 D • Aw 00MM Ply i)e b18tr 62,3% Reaervolrs a St. PI 47.7% 52,3% -47.7% D . Avg DwM"DAY TurboQanereUn " 62.3% 47.y% D'Av9 b.yMw<D q x Pum , Motors, Boo 62.3% 264,994 292D . Ava (IfIMM . Dor- m -Purification S atom $497,322 - 1000% - 178,717 _ c•er. Av.rq. Pw Z2 Walwr Mains _117± It 7 _ 43 100.0% _ za Structulea klm love #43 57.6% 12.4% J--- _-13,±02,369 #2,786,0!4 $0,607,373 24 subtotal 8,697,371 _ Water istr butio - 48 - .0% - #797,032 _ c.6 r. Awns. Dw _ 2 696 _ - 0.S0 "a me Awno• Dw 2a Building i E ul Inon 797 032 1 00 21 Furniture ± Fixtures 2,696 100.0% 100.0% 7,260 c.Sre Aver•ae DAyT_ 21 Office E9u ffsent -7 269 - 36,667 C•Sr. Awrea• D!Y 36,667 100.0% ze (Streets 6 Bddpas 100.0% 10^610 c.er. A-reraae Dw m _ Ataohlnery L E u m 1 o,OSO 100.0% 22,967 0.100. Av.na• DO!- ,o 0 ao Radio Equipment 22,967 67,174 - __0% 26.D% -50380 {6,793 0•een 30 E 1 6e9% 2,121,314 4,289,766 D •Aw o. MK uxov_-- t:qmpp at MlscaNtmaous 76 - 33 Transmiss. Walla Me 0,411,082 - 6,977.321 o5r•Awrroe Pay 33 DlatribuN nWatetM 6,9773 100.0% 24 33.1% -1,648 _ 3,130 D-~_AV P.YM"". a Water Mafarv 4,676 287,772 a•m0•AVera•Drr- x Wafer drama 267,772 100.0% - - 100.0% -_i,?461-o e7 - c.ar ere Servlues 1,74_6,0±7 - 11 421 c.Bre Ave.a. Dry err Incinerators 1,421 100.0% - - _ _ 100.0% _ 910_689 ere _Interc toralCOlleclo 916,686 % ___:7,896,180 _ =6,066,042 t4,308,691 117,211,003 subiDtal 17,2712724 ~4SJ% 29.3% 26.0 - ~yy i DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COST-w5• RSexla7.wx1 F+tl COST OF SERVICE STUDY W'P'r 17-e•P-OZ ALLCCATI ON TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONETS INVESTMENT IN WATER PLANT (NErnock VAA(UEl Tat ERCENTAOHS (,'UST FMHR EASE r•K +IIFip C•prb M•M co to C=, lii Ana. +r• ExYe CaOh CoOa c"k AW Fps 1ef#-a! Co•b oOM , D•Y _ eA+le Ietertna - 482 _ - f0o.0% :1,138 c e~envno+Dw or 10 Furnkurs d Fixtutu_ iL188 - 100.0% c•aw Av•rsa• Ow 11 Oltlce E R1ent - _ 100.0% 7,802 c. sr. AV•ngs Ow •x Radb E/Llr1 ent 7,802 _ 13,494 c.er• Ave•a• o•r _ a Mleeepeneous Equip 13,484 100.0% 100.0% 312,276 e•wsl MSlsr com 1♦ Water Meters 312,276 - 6,684 c•Rr. Av.r•a• Dw u Servbee 6,694 100.0% - _ +Obtotsl 340302 (312,276 _1125 02(1 As.o.aal f 40 _ at E 1 earn - 83' - (10:098 c.nr. Ave;:. D+Y 100.0% _ AY _ Fufnkura 6 Fixture+_ 10,088 1 % _ 20,894 CONT. Ave D.y~_ Office MSChlnes _ 20,8841 - -100.0% (30,762 _ bc,Tas 44 1+ Subtotal 30762 X1.0 - er aboraro - 0' 100.0% - - (76,881 O`ar• nvrw. Day I eo BuNdnBfE4ulPme 76,601 1DO.G% 12,180 c-ewnwrw•ow 51 Furnkure 6 Fixture+ y 12,190 IOO.U% - 2,407 c•Rr•_Aveea• n 1 sz Olkce.- MacAInes 2,407 - - - - - 100.0% 12,079 W Cneu• Awrrp. P.y Ml+eageneous E ui 52,078 - - f102,b26 N wblohl 102,624 54 ' Water 1 a: _ 100.0% (60,013 c•Br• Avory nsY Ours LIdM Elm _ _ 60 013 Dw 62 100.0%Roberts 100:0% 57 Subtotal 736,836 Tolall i 5 477 00711 10.3% BD.7% 0.9%-__.,_~, ~B 2tlB 496 (84,183 899 (7,104_706 M.477.000 BASIS FOR AL1pCA1gMe: 68 A• olAwn"AocalnlsV (:etls. To b•r•covrW tom minMun bNa. WIbmNlltlw Crt•.Tob•rreVKM Yo'nminhw^ bill C. S••s AYK•a• Dw • TO bO r•e•'Ar•d Man OxapO mon+IM vown• Wd. U• Mrman D•VI*Avr•a•Dw RWO.TOb•Irovrrl cam IOCIMy cllaa•a•wontl p•R votun•rtlr. E. Mmmu HOUbAmaoot)OYRtlb.T•b•r•Wwed from bcllAychfa•alrlmelpllk wwnsreHl. F. Nlec•IOd seOerdlra b+1•w•l2N•d wKlas of el e+fOr wOl.. . 16.51% Avr•a•dtlM ra•orl• 14.03 mad ON 11nr 0.11 isn•l 5.11% mOd COpAtl Nbotlbn•' etl•ly beta lw•w1• 1'" 1.00 Mn•r 52l TOW d•y brOOYI• 174$ mad A?.el% Fm P4oducbon 21.72 mad 1,01 bn•t Mrlnun drybr•C 77.51 mad 3.02 HMOs "Sm Fa DI1VHullon P•el xary FaOCnI- (WMnIMO UIIaYhrlOau•d,drprscNtlon ltlMrlAUI IMaI r••1s,is tllocalW to ootl eompon•n1O. Y SECTION 8 RETURN OF INVESTMENT (ROIL TO GENERAL FUND (COST W5f) f b Rea2112.Wx3 F" DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES coer-ws7 COST OF SERVICE STUDY w+N ALLOCATION TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS I7-B,p-et WATER PLANT GENERAL FUND RETURN ON INYEaTMENT \ T«~ PERCENT O CUSTOM R BASE _ arlYp M514r e«. E51'S comb comb cp Iry Lass-q G5N G5Y .We. GY Gp«Ny IM I t From Schedule COST-W59: 1 NET PLANT • 6YST1711r $24,741,371 33.2% 36.1% 28.7% -$6,208,406 ;9,426,204 $7,104,706 24.7-$,314 .0% 67.347,004 57,347,004 2 Water Storage Rights 67,347,094 100 - 3 -Ace. Depr. - WtF.Rlpht (1,409,38 100.0% _ 1,409,38 11,449,36n 4 + Lend 194,112 100,0% 194,112 194,M - 100.0% 1 ,796,862 1,796,382 6 + Cornlrudbn-In-Pro 1.766,602 B Fixed Assets - Nst 62,609,723 - 9.0% 81.6% 8.8% 8,208,468 67,299,666 7,104,706 02.000,725 7 - Water Stciape F11911110. ($67.347,064 100.0% _ (87.347,064 137.347,004 e -Contributed Csplhl (16,994,204 39.2% 36.1% - 28.7% (6,306,410 _ (0,_094.916 (4,622,974 !10,064,204 100,0% 1.469.367 7,409,307 9 + ACC. Daprec. on Wtr. 33,2% 38.1% 28,7% 1,861,226 2,526,308 11,602,298 0,510,532 10 + Acc. Deprec,on Cont. 8,679,832 1 1 Total Rq Beals 16,317,673 29.1% 46,7% 26.2% 4,763,200 7,460.289 4,114,126 10,317.374 _ 8.60% 0.00% 8.06% 6.00% 0 12 ROI Rate N 13 Told $979,D~0 20.t% 46.7% 26.2% _ $286,197 7$447,010 $246,846 °79.001 Rp 100.00% 14 Used for Fiscal Year $943,346 29.1% 46.7% 26,2% $274,793 $430,709 $237,643 w 1 i SECTION 9 WHOLESALE CUSTOMER ALLOCATIONS (COST W5g) r I i I I { 3sa h T R TIES F.Y COST AL1-OCA?IONS j 92 LAKE CI. 1993 WAS 9- $4 500,000 $45k 06 A NET BOOK VALI)F.; ke Cities 900 OQO 725000 1 Grass Production Plant alloced 0epreciatlon (4 years) ,775,000 $3600,000 $3,775, 2 Lsss lake Citles Ac ul" P ,eduction plant Lake Cities Net 61000,0()o 3 Equals G,000,000 500,000 500,000 5,040 ALLOCATION BASIS: $22 B. of Lake cities Plant $225,000 p.6000 4 Capacity 0.6292 0.0375 5 lake Citles Demand Callon (#31#4) 0 0375 6 Annual DepreClatlOn C'apl►al Cost! 7 Net Production plant Gallon (#61#4) plant peak 2.07% 1.67% .a.+ 8 Depreciation Cost! Dally Demand vs. 9 eke Cities Maximum capacity 1 2.4 200,0()o vs- 10 Cap 500'000 axlmurn Dally 10 a0e sties MJ 30,000,000 $0 $g 46B,056 Q 502y.._111 ED CAPITAL: $0 $1,446207 C, Cr CRIBntrl Water Transmo`n!Wate( Transmi ssion i1 G~')ss Couia d Depreciation Transmission 12 Less Accum on Water $18,750 als Net Cnntributed $18,750 ?~Wg 012_ 7 13 Equ ANNUP.LoDEPaRnCI#6fO#BkXPE1JSE; 2 6 7 D. 14 produc> WIN i5 Transmission clatlon C*"nse 300,000 i6 Water Depro 3iA,5s3 82,748. INVESTMENT: 1022 9S2,748 E. RETURN ON 418,814 Production Plant (#5x#7) 17 9.15% i8 Transmission 9.34% 19 Net Water .uy capital plus 1.5% 20 Water Cost of on Investment 17,163 q$324,120 , 00 °l0 21 Return 1 A.00% STREET RENTAL;i18~5 P 22 Projected Revenue ff$ 23 Stre(A Rental Percentage 24 Street Rental Page 1 P30,. LAKE CITIES F.Y. 1993 WATER COST ALLOCATIONS G. PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES 25 Plant $314,583 $0 26 Transmisslon 102,231 0- 27 Total 416,814 0 28 Tax Rate 0.006851 0 ; 29 Payment in Lleu of Taxes RIM $0 H. WORKING CAPITAL: 30 Operatlon & Maintenance Expense $213,691 $168,089 31 Working Capital Percentage 0.00% 12.500,,lo 32 Water Cost of Capital plus 1.5% 0.00% 9.15% 33 Working Capital $3.'l66 $.N3 r' I. LAKE CITIES FIXED COST SUMMARY: 91 - 92 92- 93 34 Water Depreciation Expense $27,762 $26,667 35 Return on Investment 38,930 35,038 36 Street Rental 12,687 12,965 37 Payment In Lieu of Taxes 21806 0 38 Working Capital 3,766 1,923 39 Fixed 0 & M 183,255 133,959 40 Total Fixed Costs $U.912,'~S ?iQ, O If, LAKE CITIES VARIABLE COST SUMMARY: 41 Water Cost $25,261 $88,164 L6 341129 42 Variable 0 & M 30A 43 Total Variable Costs $55,697 =U K, LAKE CITIES TOTAL COST: k2AL $332.846 44 Projected Revenue $317,163 $324,120 46 Revenues Over Cost ($7,789) ($8,726) 46 Shift in Revenues 2.69% Notes: 1. Used 40.44% as the % of Contributed Capital that applies to Gross Transmission. 2. Used 90.00% as the % of Contributed Capital that applies to Accumulated Depreciation. 3. Fxcludes depreciation on Lake Cities donated waterline. 4. 21-Sep-92 CA123r3\rstudy\93\w\93wwho1e,wk3 Page 2 -31- CORINTH F.Y. 1993 WATER COST ALLOCATIONS A. NET BOOK VALLIE: 91 - 92 92-93 1 Gross Production Plant $10,618,431 $11,05?,431 2 Less Gross Accumulated Depreciation 4,15 2247 4 455060 3 Denton Net Production Plant 6,464,184 6,597,371 4 Less Lake Cities Net Production Plant 3,775,000 3,600,000 Fi Equals Corinth .41located Production Plant 2,689,184, 2,997,371 6 Gross Transmission System 8,723,633 10,671,633 7 Less Gross Acc, Depreciation Transmission System 3.77670 4,260,552 8 Denton Net Transmission System 4,947,963 6,411,082 9 Less Net Contributed Transmission System 0 1,446,207 10 Equals Corinth Allocated Transmission System 4.947 963 4 964,874 B. ALLOCATION BASIS 91_ 92 92 - 93 11 Denton Capacity 24,200,000 30,000,000 MGD 12 Corinth Peak Day 1,250,000 1,000,000 MGD 5,17% 3,33% C. ANNUAL DEPRECIATION EXPENSE: 13 Production Plant 305,158 300,813 14 Transmission System 436,182 4.84,8x}2 15 Total Plant & Transmission Depreciation Expense 741,339 785,694 16 Minus Lake Cltles Plant & Depreciation Expense 27,762 26,667 17 Applicable Depreciation Expense 713,577 759,027 18 Corinth Percentage 5,17% 3.33% 19 Depreciation Expense 36.858 25a l D. RETURN ON INVESTMENT; 20 Production Plant 138,904 99,912 21 Transmission System 255 677 166,490. 22 Net Water System 394,481 265,408 23 Water Cost of Capital plus 1,5% 9,34%a 9115% 24 Return on Investment AM 24,297 E. STREET RENTAL: 25 Projected Revenue $479,401 $425,820 26 Street Rental Percentage 4,00% 4,00% 27 Street Rental $19.176 17 Page 1 -32- . I I I 1 1 CORINTH F.Y. 1993 WATER COST ALLOCATIONS F. PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES 91 - 12 92-93 28 Plant 29 Transmission 138,904 0 30 Total 2557 0 31 Tax Rate 394,461 0 $o 32 Payment in Lieu of Taxes 0.006851 Q. WORKING CAPITAL. 33 Operation & Maintenance Expense $323,767 $258,559 34 Working Capital Percentage 0,00% 12,50% 35 Water Cost of Capital plus 1,5% 0,00% 9115% 36 Working Capital Q 2 ti H. CORINTH FIXED COST SUMMARY: 37 Depreciation Expense $36,858 $25,301 38 Return on Investment 36,845 24,297 39 Street Rental 19,176 17,033 40 Payment in Lleu of Taxes 2,703 0 41 Working Capital 51638 2,959 42 Fixed 0 & M RU 64_9 218,!41 43 Total Fixed Costs S 8 3 I, CORINTH VARIABLE COST SUMMARY: 44 Water Cost $61,239 $102,858 45 Variable 0 & M 38,118 39,818 46 Miscellaneous Income .($720) 820 47 Total Variable Costs 1=01 it41,856 J. CORINTH TOTAL COST: $485,505 IQ.IB& 48 Projected Revenues $479,401 $425,820 49 Revenues Over Cost ($6,104) ($4,366) 60 Shift In Revenues 1.03% Notes: 1. Used 40,44% as the % of Contributed Capital that applies to Gross Transmission, 2, Used 90,00% as the % of Contributed Capital that applies to Accumulated Depreciation, 3, No Federal Grant Funds in Water. 4, C:1123r3\rstudy\931w193wwhole,wk3 21 -Sep--92 Page 2 -33- h~ R89,392.WA3 Fl, rl DENTON MUNICIPAL IJ'IILIIIPS ~)gr-W59 I WSW COST OF BFRVICF STUDY 21-erR-9z ALLOCA970N TO IrUNMIONAI. COMPONISN'IS WATER PUNT WN(NER4 kr.USrOAr HCALCUTAWNS T«t rINCHNTA _EE CUSTOMER BASI3 _ Yr BII N9 MHU 9rr UBllh) Mdr Ag COO 1992-93 Colb Col: Day CrpCorti Corb cc rb C1pully tl rl B 2t.ka citlae Iel.r~ ~14t6000001-66,4% 44.6%g! ~24, i 7 12-F 4,92-8,318 t,052,430 2,000,666f 148,6004000 llll LL ) 3 IJuUiuld - 16 662,431 6G.4% 44.8% 076 2,021,762 35230 GMM Moore -62 14MR 30.96 0w) .465.060)1 (4,466,06D) B1kb a. Depmcimi ~n10~-{~, OD0.00011 0% go s 6506~--i_~62~1%_ _ 47. X ^--L_- 5862,720 1 902,340 (900 6 NEr - - - x,602,3 2,70::,014 6,697,0173 a LGAUA F1wd raE Lmo -ilL 6,000,000 66.4% _44,6% 2.676.421 6,898.090 600,000 -66,4% 44,6% 277,040 222,062 500,000 9 LCMW Msx a]!_M OD) 10 n" Gl~rld MdD) 30,000000 66.4% 44.6% -16,622,591 13,377,100 28,809,007 11 Nw Aod NErtt GphrplW D,600o 0,5000 T O.eooo 0.6000 _0.80_00 1 12 _RW"kOon 0DOVORk11n 0.0376 _ 0.0375 0,0375 0.076 0.0376 13 IGMUA 8twra _ 1,67%. 1.87%_ _ _-1.67% _ 1.57% 1.67% 14 Co~lrlh hYK~(MOD) _ 1000000 F3-0," 00,000 -1,OW000 1 omxcoa 1,000,000 130000,000 00,000 301000,000 30000 000 3p,0DOD -18 PwwN ai ToLi 3.33% 3.33%_ -33,93% _..3.33% ' 1 ryLU PRg1LroILON _PuN=.141}1:%: 17 ►Mt LCAIUA Pl" 3-_~56.2% 438% ` W-_~i 2,024~076i801 3,000,000 15 1.c;1,uA Max 0" _ iMMC1uj__ 500-10M) 66.% 44.0% ]tL_ 2 !7 ,040 _20.962 600,000 a4.Km CaN'Oalb_n 0.0376 0.0376 0_0376 0.037b 0.0376 0.1600 1B Dam 20 LGMUA F1wd E xoio. $18-760 65.4% - 44.6% 10 309 8,381 10,760 21 TnrrmkWan _Dorr_e?k* n 484,552 W 33.1 % 66.0% _ 180,439 _ '32 _443 404,002 22 _15: UA 1Mr1TE11rn- 0 560 33, I % _ 66.0% V _ . - 6600 23 tCMUA• Al9abd Trop lrrl 4761022 _ 33,1% B6, ,,0% _ 167x178 _ L? ,84b 176,022 247 L0MVA0~1 _ 1,67% 1,67% 25 - LCMUA Tromnwwilon u#p -c _ 7,917 6297 7,817 25 LOMIA OLM 188008 8.0% 0.3%_ 91,9% I.0% 10,037 490 164,649 x,004 160,009 27 Cod rAh'+ 0& M _ 268,669 6.2% _ 0,37 _69.7% 23.7% 16,069 _ 799 180,90Y 61,394 250,EE9 25 YWrYMg Q % 12,60% 1260% 1260% 1260% 1260% 29 Embrdera -Cori m crp ♦ Le R LMUA4 _Nblklrp CWJ $1,0236.0% 03% 919% 118% 116 6 1,789 34 1,923 31 Cud_rah'n Wt*Iry_ C~IMI - ~_T.t969 02% _,__07%__607%- 237'4 706.'1 7032,969 1)EN',ON Ml AICIPAL UT'ILI'TIES cos?-wbg Wea COST OF SEfiVICE STUDY 21 -06p-92 ALLOCATION TO RINCITONAL COMPONI'.N'!S WATER PIANt WBU(E.4,IE pU glUJEq CAfCUU IIU 3 E Test PERCENTA6B8. . 9 TCM ER Year 8illin9 Motor - - _ C E3A6t-- Daee ExtraBiling --Moter4 - 1D92-9,7~ Conti Costs Avg. Day Capaolfy Costs Costa Avg. Extra I J1 d 9 A R C D A A Coetn Copa01 LA C ~ _ L D 32 IOHUA-IYr Oe IIO _600 000 33 a NH Red. PIa11 Cy,1J Coe - - o.61oD - _ 217,0 1e z2z`e6z 34 NM WFroteeele PredWUm 300,000 35 x Wtnt4wle~q~01 ilosrtlP 9.16%- 3e . RDlnn LCA4WA's Phsduc8 - - B.Ib% --i- .-.._13J,%71 .463 300,000 `16,21'! l 12,248 27.463 3 34 7 Go TrerwmWbn _ D3.1x - - Aeo. DpreelJbn 60.9% nrumWl 4,280,662 39 - 33.1% CB B%----- 7, ND,678 10,371,633 Nr limemiwron 5,411_052 _ -06,9% 58 - 1 409"741 28(10 810 40 nrwe Cont6,/rd CpN.r -_8% 2,121,3!4 4,200,651 41 33.1% 58.9% 4,289,7(18 B,411.002 4044% _ 6,292,200 10,702,004 42 40.44% 40 16,994,204 a area nemnmed rrrirrn~r 9,~59,05A - 441E 40,44% 41144% 33.1% tltl.B% 43 Aeo. Crp. .n Cmt,n. c_peJ 2,140,188 .__1327,8110 6 ,_670032 erso cee % - - _ 44 t iren^nxlbn Me. Dep, 33.1% 80.00% 46 Mo. o -1,849,289 3,733,b64 aslPasz rp, on trMe. aor,rC. a- 6~021,e49 _ - 9D.fH1%- % Bo.~% 9000^xr - 85,8% 1.081,041 3,380,'r07 48 rat C";inU ~q nsnenra - 1,448.207- _ - - $.ozr,wA - ~ 33.1% 47 Net rnm. --NN um4b. Dan 4,861,874 478,525 _ iii .fIG-44l-, a~iz 5tl.9 ~.,,exe, 41 LoMPA ahw T - _ (,642,789 -3,322,086 Lt IOBUA NelTuLIM,I n(!± 62,745 1:6'/z 1.07%7 % 50 a Wholn!t Roi Peroenl _ 8.16% - 33.1% 08.9% - ~ 27 360 , • 66,x88 61 lo1wA 1FerrmU,bn Rol 1NS =767E 9.16% 33.1 % 8,16% ~_~r-_ _ 86.8% 7,676 52 Wars DsaeCislhIT 300,BIa 63 +Trwwmlesbn a ~-184,882 87.0% - 33,0% - _ 88,8% 201 888 P tlt4 M • Total E 766 084 --r--"• 300,813 65 150,438 -324 413 -lake -b3. 9% 404,082 t{rdh us --•L- 46,8% 61,2% _•352,128 _~?36d7 706,095 66 .Us Alioce Nb 57 x 001 fmh - -l-- 45,0% 61.0% 13,_,•009 _ 13 e9A I'Vrq Pemanl 0,33% 409~908 769,0'(8 68 . Codnth'e nCJa bn E 26 301..._ &0%- 59 Dsdisn Net Want 871371 _ w 67,5% 42.4% - I.CMIIA Net r _ a 500ooo 902 959 `2 796 o14 11 t'bdntll NbceAed Rode _2 907 3FJ --61.2% _ 43.8% - 2 --8,597,373 59.3% ,024,398 1,6?6,d01 3,60U,D00 02 ■ Wrksfr P1urt Porark _ x.33 - --1 777 9e0 1219 413 A3 OuOrth Rodsation IMen - - 3.33% 1"--' 2,997,973 99012 3.33% 64 z l4Mleee10 WX Paroorrl 9 a% _ y40_7% tl5 .-WdrMr Rent RO-I -.916%_--'9,}d%. 8,1b% 0.16%- 90.912 ---=8 NB - 69 3% 40.7% _.___.-61428. 0,721 9,148 1 I 1 RSO1592.WK3 Flnsl DENTON MUNICIPAL U'I'ILI'I'IES COST-W6g Winer COST OF SERVICE STUDY 21--flap-92 ALLOCATION TO PUNMIONA1, C(*1110NEN'1S WAIEM PUNT WHOMMLc evar"Ex Goxvvr"o ~T MPERCEN AOEB CUUTOMEf% _ BABE. -t Year _ PIA 11fnB Meter 9ssu Crtra &Ilinp Metor Avg, - t:xtre 1982-93 osts costs Avg. Day Capacity Casts Costa Coale Ceparaty -T- Dud t P 1 G O A r- 8 C D 66 Ono~TtsrxTL ~ L-1 10,871,833 _1_33,09%~0.9119 I vn'F 7,140,678 10.071.099 t- 61 TRns. Axum. Dcpsc, 4( 280,66-_-._~-- (4,260,651) 2. N 314 4289,758 0.411 6s Denbn Contributed Yrp 8411,002 53.09% _88.91% -/002 89 - Net Contributed Treneml 4,4M,207 33 09% 80.01% 4 8 626 887,867 1,446,207 .076 1,8 {2,789 3 70 - Codrrh NbTa/1d Traier __.4,964,974_ _73;09% e322__.1085 . 4084 I I x tinfnM ph" Penient 3.33% 3,33% 3-.33% _ 3.3.3% 3.33% - 94,760 -1101736 165,490 72 Trar+mlab . (bdrah Nat 165 498 T3 z m04#6 " Parceat 9,15% 9.-- 9.16% D.16% 9.15% 74 - Codrsh 7ronomN.hn R __=16,160 v~- 33.00% 89.111% 16.160 -I . W 75 ibdrah-R edict Rewnue -~26,9ffi -_8.21% 0.31% 89.74% _23.71% 26,448 1,318 21by47 101.109 42.120 76 LCMILt Proieclad Rs~wrtits ,324,120 1.0714 _ 0 30% 91.94'li _ t.78% - 19,364 _ _ 863 _ 208,011 6-1782, 3244,120 77 M 64M RwrYl Ferdnfs _ 4.00% _ 4,00% TI a Onrfrsh BYsw Ren4i =17,033 8,21%_ 0,31% 60,74i 23.'14% _10b6 _ 63 I1 r878 _-4044 17,033 7s~ ILMLN~BYSN RsrrsJ- X12,995 6.07% .30% D}.94%- Y.70% 774 --_-39 _J X11820 232 12,985 _ - 6541 H4 69% 10,309 _ 6,081 10,760 se P1M pe~n5nn 6x_ sense IB 760 I a1 Tortamlrlon DT E_" r?rr _ 7,917 33.09% 60-01% 2 820 6,297 7,017 - _ ,7 6OA9% _110 _6 - 1 _7 B9 -__34 1,023 17 YWrMinR_ CISJ 1,923 _27,.489._._..___.._._..__-. 56.41% _44.69% 246 27,463 66 Pled F" 94 Trananllet{Orl 33.09% 01% - 2,606 7,576 s5 RMesl Rrthl 12,866 6.97tA 0.30%_-01.94% 179% _ 7T4 39 _______511920 -___232 12,985 as YlYi1r, 98,184 19.46% 6:.56% 47.211 00,I04 si O LM 1681089 - 51971L -_0,38% 9194%.- 1.79% 10,037 499. 11i4e6,B 160,089 at lf.MllA_ TOTAL 2,646 - 3.20% o,1n% __72^0816 __24.47% 410,928 1 Al 5239,923 $61 03 332,040 6I_00% 25.301 869 D!poq!tg- - 184 962.7 _ % _ - at Workln IW - 21069 8,21% -_0.31% yit^~ ' 40.68 - _ -_p -----ti3tl.7703 9t 16 iae s2 P11nt R01 9,1~4tl ,160 0 i3 03 Trarrmlwion Rol 16,160 64 gbr.,t 7larrhl 17,0.33 6,21% 0,31% -89.71%, _-23,74'. --'--1,060`-------_63111079 _1.014 17.053 -_-.102 079 J 40,45% u3 66% 471779 G~f779 102.0110 95 Yhtw _ SF9 6 21% 0 9111+ _100 00% 23.74% 19 069_ _ 709 19013071 _91,394 200,G69 - 029 (020) 97 MNsaelle neuun - _ - - - j A/ C(MiINIII T07AL. E430,10 - f1/ 3131__. 081 }2831283 _Y, 140,751, A30,160 1 ' Jv SECTION 10 SUMMARY OF REVENUE AND COST ALLOCATIONS TO CUSTOMER CLASSES (DISTRIBUTION W1) J r ~t R090WWK3 IRY DENPON MUNICIPAL U111.111ES Orar-Wr W.kr COST OF SERVICE STUDY ' SUMMARY OF ALLOCAMONS TO CUSTOMER CIA081FICATIONS WAMR SYS11N orrital 1992-83 Rosldanllal Commerclol Oovuno- I Wholesale Wh0la salo Allocatlnn -eWy~I_~,WRNS_~_.-jYJC,WCN)__._Nj_lO,WON1-L Corinth ~LCMUA_ [lases GOURCES OF WORKING CAPITAL: _ I sale of z l V nW_etRato Change t2'6 122 _ 6,769.785 _ ~ - --=I 3 Subtotal {12,°67,966 6,003,7b7 _ 38113BB __-430,188 _--332,848 12,067,973 Other Rove u si--_ I\ 4 Tap Foss ---_------_---=35.000 f7,B09 -----16_200 983. 0_ 0 Soo Dlet-W4la_RL_ s Al d- I n- Construadon 60x100 26,441 23,166 1,404 0 u- 0 SoDlst,•W4{n e Colilorn Analysis 20,100 _ 7,91%8 116 66'7 920 0 Bee tllst-W4jp-gJ_, I Interest- Operations 93,090 _ 47,320 43,086 2,6120 0 Gee Olat-W4ja~,L e Mlacella_nsous Income 111fp0 - 6,697 _ 6094 309 0 0 Sae Olet-W4Lg!__ s Subtotal _._=208,000_ OA,076 ;88.241 _;6,°66 - ..$026 ;0 _ to Total C_f13,006_i98 ;6,9B 3,8bB __$8,101,990 1._____;337,264 00= X332, &t 1 13,066,973 USES Operations 6 a to e' ~m+e 11 Personal Servlcos $2320111e. 11,170,332 ;1,067,094 69,°68 ;106896 ;09,012 Bee DlagL 12 erg{lea _ 617,031 _ 211,074 _ 241-712 131467 24,211 16,780 Sae Dms-w4_, 13 Purchased Pc vet 670 207 _ 247,2 06 269,374 1$,997 - 26986 17L6BB Boo DIet-W~a-B!_ W 14 `Maintenance 911,61b 404,041 1!:0 168 24,606 44,094 - 26,736 See Dist-M(R- at-W41a. =g~._. VIC 09 869 262 368,726 491,6x6 22,364 40 240 26 2z4 s19 RI_ v 1e Ca .----_L_ r 1e Purchase of Water_ 1911A72 0 o 0 - 102,11 58 80,164 _8ee Diet-tea-_U)- 11 Insurance 8 Sundry T - 35,926 _ 16,374 ----10,748 932 - -1,070 _ -_-t,093 Gee Dist__W4 a-gj_ 06,000 30114 33035 1.054 0 -_~0 Bee Dle1tW4(a-g)- is it Debt EMW u Lake RayRobert!Arnie 1,°671710 126 _ j.0Wr772 ____661812 0 _ 0 See Dlab-W4 20 Administrative Transfers- 040662 _537,006 82,93° _4,428 15,463 - -_0,668 see Dbl-W4(a=Qi_ 0 WholesakmROI - 69,336 A29^94J4----{27,679 -_---.I1,712}__J242297 36,Wa B„a_nls1-W4a--gi_ 2. _ - - - _ Bee plal_W4(a-9~ m Wholesale Street Rental Fees.- -----2BL998 RS15 067 {16_A 29) _17,0.73 12 _°06- Uoe Dist- W4(a -gL_ 24 _ Deneral Fund ROI - 6% 043,346 8041°71 412,328 _ --_28,016 0 Dlsl-Wye-y~-- n - Of1se16 Whobsale 140182 otleel 4,266 T eubtnfal _-A8,93B6fl) _>1„410829?." T_4,U051066 _`,{22137:0 ,.,_.,402,%49, 3!1 obi d - Y._.----_.-_--.. 2r For Rev. DDebt I&SFund 21470,96 _1,0211737__._ 1,OM~602 0 _--_-__-o Seo_Dlel-W4(a_ 24 For to Rev. Debt Rsasrve n _ 0 0 0 o a see Dial-W4{a_91._ _ - _ - . -v _ - 2s Fbled AasetoYDeprsclatlon_ 000 A _ 687186U 470,094- 31_010 0. 0 See Dlsl W4 a- _ . so Wholesale Depreciation Fx_pens 61,966- 60" IS w4.yl sI Ut1N Bads 0 0 9 0 0 Sea Dhtl-W4Qi~w__ 32 _ fi"Ynbnt to F.hroUkl 600,°00____ _ 2I9 040 266x924_ 14 230 0 0 son 0181--w4 a- 0 subtotal ;4,122 Yl6 - :1,003 220 _=2 0901361 __~116~689 ;26,301 26 067 1u 34WI1uLENEIfCN NOEBINWIU-____ oB2r _--{2?8l1}-~i2~oi11 _--_-_-.S!TjlL llebe.-.,_. lazy 36 WATFR REVENUE RFOUREMEN1C_ f12,°62,8B6_[M j6760170~_-.:6003,/67___ 1;.039 308. 2,846 12,067,9'/3 s4RovcnuaIncrease, Noodcd-> 681% 1 SECTION 11 BASIS FOR ALLOCATING EXTRA WATER CAPACITY TO CUSTOMER CLASSES (DISTRIBUTION W2) i i 1 9 RB94699,WK3 Fker DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES R+~ •T= wow COST Or SERVICE STUDY 21 -8413-W ALLOCATION TO (AISTOMHR c7,ASSIP1CA'f10N8 9161 PM RA919 FOR ALLOCATING EXTRA AMER CAPACITY 1 _ aa_.gnc_ a 4,WONx m+.__- losalo.aet_~- LCMUA _4 asx~-_.Totd ~ele~uo.~ Fiscal Year 1993 Resldentkl Commercial J DovOFnmenlal co Wholesale Wlwlasalo 1 Estimated Anmxal Water Usage 1,603,800 2,037,688 106,860 _ _ 204,400 _ 176,200 4,027,118 x DNide by 306 days 365 366 386 - 386 386 306 s Average Ddiy Water Usage 4,120 6,663 v 280 660 480 11,033 Estlmaled Annual Willow, 188,804 26,788 1,392 12 12 196,008 1 - - - _.~1 Av Monthly QdbnalBNMng - 8,900 ! 79,024 78,042 17,033,333 14,60_0,_ _000 20,646 a g. _ Amg 1W M, 1 W e Pasts Month Historical(DOWN) 216,412 233,077 __---13,300 31,000 16,203 _ 608,102 r Billings Durlnpthat Peak Month V 13,842 2,173 118 1 i 18,133 e Pear MonthyQaMornef8161ng - 16,682 107,260 --116,431 _ 31,000,000 16,283,333 _ 31,498 9 Monthly Average Load Faclor - 616 87.84% 73.87% 64.96% - 96.63% - _,-86.23% (Average Month versus Peak Month) Ny rlaeFwW r,lnwgl wM1 23,721 0 Fxcsss Gds (OOC0e) (Une 6 - Line 6) B,V64 _ 26,237 39,389 13,980,887 883,333 14,724,260 1 (MULTIPLYBYUNE4)11000 1,123,162_---726,166 64,830 ___-__---_--167,800 6,200 v 2,081,867 19 Percent 63.96% 34.9o% 2.63% 0.06% 0.30% 100.00% La (Max. Day - Avg. Day Atlocatlon) X Perca B,B46 4,400 334 f,000 60 u Max Day Water 00099-_~ 10,066 10,043 824I_ 1,680 630f -23,722 le Wholesale Capacity Allocations (Voq-_ 1.00 0180 - 1.60 +e Allocated to Retail Customers IVOO 13,094 6,489 _ -_039 - _ 22,222 n Permit 66,92% 36.20% 2.88% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% EXHIBIT 12 DISTRIBUTION OF UNITS OF SERVICE TO CUSTOMER CLASSES ~`IISTRIBUTION W3a AND W3b) y , TI sns1592.Wx3 Fhst DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES mer-WJr nwr WATER & WASTEWATER STUDY ~ DISTRIBUTION OF WATER COSTS TO CUSTOMISR MAMIMCATION5 o1'.Is PM FIBCAL YUM 199.2-1903 Ifld Rtkll^ Commercial Governmental Wholasee -r{-1'holeaelo~-Tolal__ b" _ l fWC.WCN] (WO,WO~1_I-_ Corin LcMUR~- Units o Service; A o me(f100' (Average oay1 - 1,603, 2036,6V 105'2.90.^._- 264,6 --Y176,6~ 4,027,116 cxw.-Aw. o.v - 00 L 37.3~~6 60.80 ~T2.e3 6 0 } 36 Og. e. Exba Cepao t1-YfODI 0.846 - 4.480 0.334 1.000 r 9 Ma7dmum l3a 519§ 31.98 _21Q3 B.OL 0.3BZL naAy, oeYAxc~.~F_ o. Ealknated BIINnpa 196,004 BB 1,3w 12T `12 198 008 A - L _19N-L- Igjasl- L o.o~4G l ----001- ~oo•pp Ae Curl AOCLCnrt._ lnas bV Mater z m. N0 of Bill 314 inch Metw MNlnya 100,127 12,602 449 - - - - _4__-_,_ _,--173,078 A• curi_M1c<LCae1• 1 Inch Molar 13116n s 6,194 3,563 105 8,882 A. cun. Aca.Co.,. 1.6 Inch Motor 81111nga 2,380 2,730 _ 112 6,238 A= curt Aaa,.cosl. 2.0 Inch Meier 84111E- f,M 6,801 479 - 7,265 A. cun. Acuc..t. 3.0 Inch Meter Billln 672 187 869 A- cu,i AWCo.u 4.0 Inch Motor Bl lllnpa 499 62 661 A c-ul Aaot.Caste 0.0 inch Mater 81111n at 7 -12_ ~ - - 81 n. cuu Ard.cort. I 8.0 InchMeteiBlNlr1g,--- 6, - 12 e3 A. cu,l.AaAlto W _10.0 Iuch Molar Blllina 10 10 A• curl AcsuMola 188,804 26,709 _ 1392 12 _ _ 12 188;666 A. cu.r 88.2 0.0 ,01 00 0gq.02 ate Coe el ht n[n Rat 3141nohMetsrCod 1.00 --1A0 Too 1.00 1.00 - $125 4-cwt. Mraa Carts _ 1 Inch Meter cost 1.87 97 - - =209 e.w.t mew cote 1.6 Inch Meter Coat 3.33 x.33 3.33 3.33 3.33 416 e,.cu.1. M.lu Cosa 2.0 Inch Molar Coal 6.33 6.33 - 5.33 _ 5.33 6.33 peal: e_cuol. Ma.rcoot$ 3.0 Inch Meier Coal 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 {1,260 a. 01st Mrtu cosh 4.0 Inch Mater Coal 16.60 10. Be - 18- SC 18,96 18.Be 2,Oe3 a.a1LLM&I$,Co.t, e40 Inch Male( Cost _ 33.33 _ --33.33 _ 33.33 - 33.33 33 33 ~4 f8tl e•atl Mcnr cosh • B O jnch Motor Coat -•-_53.33 ___63 _6333 63. IOA Inch iAefar 73.33 73.3 D,18 e•CUaL W. M, co,M 0/4 Inch Mato( Coat Ev _ 100,127 - _ 12,602 149 - 0 0 173,078 e.cuu Maw Cott* 1 Inoh Mater Cwt E l 8,075 _ 5,961 176 0 0 14,800 a-cult Mr Mr Cosh 1.5 Inch Meter Cost E 9,120 _ 374 W0 0 17,444 B.wrL M.Mr Cow 2.0 Inch Mater Cwt E _ 5,836 y _ 90,333 2,663 - 0 _ ~0 96,721 Batt Mrsr costs 3.0 Inch Mater Coat E 6,710 1,071 0 0 8,500 BCW, Mow Cobh- - 4.01noh rCost •D _ ---61311 973 0__.~~0 9,184 a•cuH M4nr roih 6.0 Inch MaMr Cwt E -----_0 2,038 249 _ --__0 ---400 _2,065 a=curt Med, cafe--- "11t1d1 Mate C 2 16 0 - 840 0 3,365 e-lut Ly1for Cort+ 10.0 not a ei~ad E ulvafenb 7 T _ 711 a att. MyMr cork sublotmi 102,667 78.433 _ 400 - - 269,EOSf-wr1. Motu cosh 1Ag-o%-6111 Curi_M.MrCar --2.44% Al III RaalsuxWM rh« DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES oior-war, W101 WATER & WASTEWATI?R STUnY DISTRIBUTION ON WAMR COS'PS TO CUSTOMBR MASSIFICAMONS 21-6q-02 rI6CAL YEAR 1902-1093 01'. EO PM -~_..--_T__~_ ,_,-u ___-_-_~_-_...J....~_ Rea d~ Comrtlarclal Qovernmental -Who(ebale ~4 ho e-f mle - Arlocnan - _ I`A_-- _ _M(S3~K+a~1 LcyuA - °-PM = ~C,_ _e...._, w. a Co a---a-~~ u auox GP _ _ 3/4InchMotor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,oD 1.00 30 M•!«Cy,clp 1 InohMolerCost 1.67 1.87 1,87 1.87 1,07 60 MN«aQwe y 1.6 Inch Meter Cwt __3.33 3.33 3.33 3,33 3_33 IDO Mc!«c•,wtr 2.0 Inch Mater Cost 6.33 6.33 b.33 6.33 6,39 _ 180 Mn«a.p.ol~_ _ 3.0 Inch Mato( Cwt `_10^67 10.67 10.67 10.67 10.07 320 MH«C,p OCIy _ 4.0 Inch Mato( Cwt _ 18.67 l e,67 10F07 18.87 16.67 BoJ Ma« cpw~y 6.0 Inch Meta Cwt _-99.33 33.33 33,33 33.33 - 33.331,000 M««c~aoty 6.0 C • Co• ^63 33 - 3 33 _63,33 _ _ _ 63.33 bJA3_ 1 900 MN Cn~a~Y=-_ 10.0 (nofl a1+sr Cwt 73.33 73.33 73.33 ____73.33 73.33 2,200 M.lr co.ew _ wbt0la 1=06-.07 _ 186.67 196.8_7 _ 190.67 189,67 6,980 _M_armP.oty 1 - =~C`___ ~~,9 3.3 3.33 3 3 _ 3.3--100,00 H.IK C~___ 1 us. Meter xe Cap•a t EAU e 1 Inch Moto( 160.127 12 602 `448_ 0 0 173,076 Msl_ « r. rM I Inch Mater Cost 6,667 6,939 176 0 0 14,771 M.!«c«,.cly 1.6 Inch Meter Cwt ~_-7;860 i,129 374_ 0 _ 0 _ 17 461 M.lr c,~wty 2.0 loch Matw Cwt 6,639 30 362 2 554 0 0 98 740 Mr!«c -!y 3,0 Inch Mato( Coet -_0 ~~-Y 7,107 1 996. _ 0 .__p_ 0103 MU«clp w~ _ 4,0 InchMetwCosl_ --_---0 __8_1311 =873 p p 9,167 MN«°y,atLr_... 8,0 Inch Al eter Cwl _ o 2,030 249 _0 400 2066 Mtlr cgrOly - --r t?1!t~l o.'~ __~Z b 4 - -_6 Q 3 bs uM ~,~er io.o n~i-TT(®ar cwT"' - o _ r4 a - a o _ 747 ,In« cw.~ty apbtoW 1 Z t _ v78,901 T 01871 640 400 _ 289,194 M««c wt 6 293 ~46_.__ -0~2f}FL_---' 0.14 =-t00,0.~hJ~..eSillLCcraAy ___J I r ~I I 1 i SECTION 13 DISTRIBUTION OF COSTS TO CUSTOMER CLASSES (DISTRIBUTION W4, W4a, W4b, W4e, W4f, W4g) 3 ne+lsa,tvra rn~ DENTON MUNICIPAL UT} MES niSr-w4 W.6r WATER & WASTEWATER STUDY Sumi.r ]11S-l'11INUTION ON WATER COSTS 21„t%P-W 1'0 UJSTOM HR C3. ASS] FI CATI ONS 01',66 rY MCA1. YEAR 101:-1093 ` Oovernmen~ Wholoeein Whcieeel® F_T Residential Commercln C tYiaJy__1__ o Wc~1NL_- --~~rlr-to--- Lc1AU __Lte1 TOTAL WATER COSTS: a; Coot Allocated to Both Wholesale k Retail: cowtorm Analy.e--- --{f~ 9oe - If~a_~16 _-~I) -J fB2o - ---3° ---..x,000 ¢ 08A1-DoParlm w,lal _ 2,227,814 2,4200792 _ 136,111 ____23,108 160:431 61181,0&4 3 Adminlstretlve Tramle 637,000 82,011 _ 4,428 1b,4b3 9,868 648,683 s subtotal - $2,766,713 {2,49_8,114 $139,b.c' $2671739 "188,089 "6,819,837 b_. Coat Allocated to onlY._RaleN:-_ e Otherlneome 98,168 --87,62 ---~6.331) Bed Dob1 F~IPenae 90,114 036 1,864 0_-- 0 _--_76,003 e Ray Roberts PayInants _807,126 D33 772 68 BI2 0 0___ 1+867.708 , 6 For Rev. Debt I&S Fun _ 1,021,737 _~84,BD2_. -71918 0 __0 2,978,267 to - 0 - 0 ----_----0 ---'0 ---------a -0 Fb1ed Asserts 687,880_173_094 31,040 -__0 0 1,092.000 IE General Fund Rol _ G04_971 412,329 26,0.16 D 0 843,345 - .~-~-0' 0 0 - 11 - R a mant to Eleclrb 259,840 _ 286,924 14,230 0 ° - 6001000 __-y _Y 1e subtoSsL 6_t075,4Y3 _-"3--~Fi7by231 {198,890 _ "0 $0 $0,647,314 c. Coal Alioated to only Whakan - - 6102_858 =a 184 191 022 1e i•11rohaead Wster =0 0 17 _ Wholesale Rd_ 1e _ Wholesale Street Bents {I3__, ___907 (161202 828 10 - Workln9 Capital 2 2 2280 0 so _De t~erlatbn Expense. _120,9 __-_124,238 _.(1,499 _ -26,3Di 28,6!17 _ _ ° x1 subtotal. 174 =172,447 21041767 811022 - - - - ¢r Total Water b~atem Costs - 361759,788 ~Oy(q~76'7 $3311x98 - f /30,188 "332 &119 $12,857,973 n Avera9eCoaVt,DDOO■Ibne"910 1' TAL COSTS TO ECOVER: - - - 24 BE COSTS - AVG. DAY $3,767,653 $5,1°5,14!0 _ $203,924_ =283 283 $239A.K3 9640,202 zs El(TM CAPAdTY___ 900,624 _---6, 05,3_0 433,907 148,%41 611.{63 1,759,932 b Cu0T064ER ACCOUNTING C -W -563,913 66,149 - 4!650 17,301 10,920 66:938 2r CUSTOMER METER COSTS: J 527,798 220,724 - 10"910 881 _ 644 - 774,1.844 y Total Costs $6,769,768 =0,003, 768 - =331,396 $430,106 $332&16 ~E12,067,i76 ao Avg. CosU1,000Gals. $3.83 $2.05 $3.13 $2,10 $1.80 $3.19 Eatinwied Revenues without . 3o Revenualncreoea 3h4=fb•.14~=--_$3e?893~==f-_=13~~120[ _?.i74 t4~~ 71 $3.92 f2.80 $2.eB f2.06 f I.B6 $3.92 J u InClaaeoln Revenueo-> 6.80% 5.30% 10.06% 1,037E 2.69% 5.81'% r 7 nf9T-W.a UENTON MUNICIPAL UTIUTIES Rsa+cvz,WK..A Fhai WATER & WASTEWATER STUDY wa•. )IS-f RIS(ITiOH OF WAMR COSTS ~ TO CUSTOMS?.R MAS.SIIRCA7IONS zl -aw -Yt FIecA4 +VAR 002- I2 W 01'.66 P9 Ibn I - 11 Ab• mrraef -..a _.._-71 W mm- - I . telClesela whole-eal0 1 "ova en - `ReTi ddenl~l i l Cfti " n eu•a ..__J - LWS: 9Ii1 . L_;W°-[Il__~L5!la word ~ _ coflnlh t~cMuA ToSRi 1==- pjstoibution of COSt6-- lL - AVEMOE DAILY BASE COSTS; 5.06x asx - +000.1% w.ecAC z.esx ra Aw_mr a-?am 0 (20, B. Base Cast Allocated to Rc_~.-____~ 908) 110_718) _ (66'7) (920) - ° 0T Colttorm Analyab - -^"10.7,022 I9p~307 164.649 _ 3,948,0Aw_2.!/ 07 rlmenW 1,490,16_4 2,-019,37tl 0 - - a Admlahallve Tramte p u.• Aw on' 0 0 '92,9,007 ,247 12,O21D,84D :103,066 5179,437 1IGt,b49 3, - - subtotal 1,442 0 0.00% 30 41.23% 66.87% 2.90% - 0 (!04,000) cl•n.•cAw_oly_-_ b, Rate CoM Allocated _to or ~ - (42977)06) ay Othet lnoome __tn 0 49304 cl«u.••n,2Cq Y0.35T. 28680 1,433 --BadOebiFxpente68,812 ~ ~1,967,710 r,.muAw o•Y' 8D7,126 1,00.7,772 Ra0 2,478,267 CI°9AIaA'AIO•y o -------1,384,602 71,818 For Rev. D1,0020 40 41 10,447 0 0 -F369.99 S3 c+°su•Awa.y 148,414 201_12 2 I Fixed Assets 12,498 0 430,709 C+•R,1•Am.o.y42 177,673 240,937 o 43 general Fund RCI 0 p cau.•• ew_D•v 461,600 cl•Rn Mw CAY 44 1228,14626.2,263 13.102 195,593 3 43.145,991 .16% 1 46 ,82subl32,319490 49 63.96Y _ _-f~,72 cz•u.••AwoaY _ o.RaeeCoalAlbcaledSoonlyWholesale: 347,779 140-,-983 4y rohatsd Watts - - - --10,431 - 17,723 0 A• ao. AcctCo•u- Pu v~ -_.(/6,734) Wholesale Rd fL -__11,920Wholalala t3tael W.an(9,912 2 0:13 1,708 o A- coatAal~.•tl(1,690) 41)0 A•cuuAcduw Wwlrlnp Cepltal 11,037 13,00 9 leWnat-. 150581 _l (13,770) - subtoh~-~(83~,103 {IM,941)J^_.12,334 ..189,799 196.374 - 199,762 Total Bess Coale y3,r07_663 16,106,690 _ 1263`924 =283,283 1239,fY23 _ 10,4(0,292 63 - 12,61 - ---'12,61 42,480-- 11.29. 17.38 as Avg. C04111,000 oale. I I Upr~ 1 Re61602,WK1 rrw DENTON MUMCIPAL UTIMIES DiS r.-w4h WSW WATER & WASTEWATER STUDY DISIRIHUMON OF WATER MS-TS 2+-emp-a2 TO MISMMLIR MASRIMCAT1ONS 01:55 Pal FMAL W_1H 1.102-1093 Realdenl~l 6ommarc{si Oovernmuninl 'Nlloloeale-' Wholea`Dle Allee.lpn C~LWF~wArr1_>~rC.y~4i+L-i,_N!_. C_I~rit?.__ ~c~t uA_IrrI otaL----- _ EXTRA CAPACITY COSTS: a. Cost AMccated to Both Wt 53.96% 34.96% 2.63% 6.05% 0.30% _ 100.003, ad CaMform_-Analysis _-0 0~~- _0 0 - 0 $0 oOAw, D.yMax Dar--1 as OM- Departmental _ 446.217 _ _-_289,642 21,081 - 8t,394 - 3,004 819,947 o=Aw. o2rM," o.3, ay - AdminNtrative Tranaie 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 o.Awg0arM•X o.r se 9 0 0 0 n 0 D.Aw. U,yMmm O.y w subtotal $416,217 -._-•$288,842 :21,891 _-$61,394 $_3,004 $810,947 b. Cost Allocated to only Re _60.81% _ 36,32% 2.877. - 00 OMor Incorne 2D, 406)1 - 8,180 --(1 ,4 - - p --p u _ ) (f 0,000} ol•Aw.o.ranxn.y 61 Had DOW Expense 8,077 3,960 297 0 0 10,333 viyAw. n.yl Mavo.y 02 -Ray Roberts Payments - - - 0 - 0 _ _0 o1.Alq, o.y1A+.. ow_ ra For Rev. Debt f4S Fun 0 0_ _ 0_ 0 Of Ami Vsylw. n1y _ I as Mod Assets 370,106 245,060 18,352 0 0 639,617 Of AVu DayyWX My as General Fund R01 139,878 81,140 6,825 - o 0 237,643 01.Ayu oaylMamDay al - B B -----8 - a 0 DI.Avp. D";Ma. Day m Re;,n0mrnt to Electric - 0 0 0 of .AVy.Dw/Ma1 rimy M ' - subtotal. ---$482,667 $320,999 _ l $24 ,039 _----$0 $0 - 1`837,693 _ 9. Cost Allocated to only Wholesale: 96.24% ,.-.--L76% _ _100,0% 70 PulehasedWatsr ----$55,07_0 _W- $,17,211 ---ta?,290 A.CUALA_tclOdsla ^ 71 Wbolssala RCI--_ (18,333 11,946)- - -(696) 13_068 _-----17,315_ _0 A. c.ar Acalcm.l. _ M _ Wholesale Street Banta Y -_-(2_,516 (1,0_39) - (123) 4,044 ---•-.232 •--.~-.0 A._Cuat AWC0111 ra .-.Working Cap)lal _ (433 (262 - (21) rat 34 0 A. Duh._t.-Aee+Gomte A _ DepieclaHon Expense (16,066 (10,470} _-._-(764) 13,664 13,666 ----V 0 Ad Cuel, Aecl,cact is subtotal. ($37,_349_-(824,336)- ($1,622) - $87,318 ----$78,460 $102_260 ra Total Exh* Capanity Costs $900,621 $666,306 $43,907 $14_6,741 - $81,463 _ $1,759,030 n Annual Cost/Extra Cepaolty M[ $8131,669 -_-$131,234 -$131,459 _y$146~741 - $1,829,)-- $138,607 - I a2 I aeot6uz,wicl Fh1! DEN TON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES bl:l r-Wll wekr WATHR 8r. WASTEWATER STUDY O1STRIUUTTON OF WAMR COSTS 71 '9rp-71 TO CVSTU1d1111 MA&SINICA-170N5 01'.66 PM FIBCAL YEAR I602-tow -Heel ertt I Commeruial Oovernrtlenfa holeieTu ~Mholesalo Nacd an CUSTOMER ACCOUNTING 68.13% 13.18% 0.71% 0.01% OAI% 100.01% a. Cost ANocated to Goth W1---- 62_60% ---.-12.05% 0A8% -2.30% 1.19% 100,06% is _ Co orm Analysle- --_.~p -----~---p p p p _ 0AL._Cult .Aoa,conc ro 04A1-Depaftmental- y.- 24,434 3,733 - --°201 800 _-`---370 28,358 A,. Cult AwLCmtc eo Administrative Transle 837,000 82,038 4,426 16,453 9,666 640,562 A- Curl. Acct Cools et 0 0 0 0 A. Cult ACCICOd1 6x Subtotal - $661,440 $65,771 $4,828 610,059 210,1137 $677,036 b. Cost Altocatodloonly WB 68,13% 13.16% 0.71% 6f ro, 01el Income 0p 0 o Ale Cost Me1COFh M ad Debt Expense 314 40 0 370 At= Cua Mef collies ay Roberta Payments 0 0 0UAl- Cult Aoofccr% se RnY. Debt Ire Fun 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,U. curt heatCost, ea dod Assets 1,077 164 9 p - 0 11250 nt. Cult McLCwte eo ` General fund RCI - 0 - 0 U - 0 o At. a,.t Mot co,6 b 4 0_ - 0 U 0 At. a_._t Ma1.COeL, _ of - Repayment to Eleotric --_2,011 _ -448 24 p AI. acre Mctcwa 92 - subtotal. ` -__-14,306 $656 $36 $p$0 $6,660 o, Cost Allocated to only Wholesale; KID% _ 50,0%_ 1 m Purchased Water -~Y-$D 0 A2.aut Aeacoac 04 ` Wholesale Rd 0 -0 r' -0 o AY. att_M000Oru oe Whole" Is 6beet Banta _ (1,078 _ j241) - (13) - - 1,060 774 (0) V. Cult .Aactcoru b o ng CapNal (39) (2 104 116 0 A2`actMCtcma er - A_epraol stbn Expense 0 - - o 0 0 0 0 A2. Cult. Aecl.colt, ro - subintal. 111.636 v (0260} -..1116) T S1_24x - $es9 _ _ Ito) _ ts Total Cuefomer Accounting C___ $663,013 =88,149 - _ _ =4,050 _ :17,301 ;10,820 3862,935 loo Average OneU&INng $3.34 :3. 34 fi,44f, '2 $910.60 03.46 i •:x.;1;.:9 R000921M M&I DENTON MUNCIPAL UTILITIES arsr-w~a wowr WATER & WASTi-1WATP.R STUDY OISPRIBUTION OI+WAT73R cons 21 _ g,p _ 02 TO QISTOM 13R a, ASSI PI CA1I ON S 01155 PAM F191AL YEAR 1092.100.7 Resren,tar Commelc al Ouvernrrento holasale TT wholesale lr Alledw tin (WWH-WHI41- I fWW_;C Iw mIU_ _cerlt111L_._L uA Total re J--_I B=Cust. Metal Cos CUSTOMER METER COST4 (18.24% 29.31% 2.46% 0.24Y, 0.15% a. Coat Allocated to Both Off 97,91% 29.20% 2.44% 024% 0.16% 100.007. 101 Colllorm_ Analysis _-.0 0 0 -----u - 0 _~-$0 0- coot. Able cols 102 06M- Departmental 207,909 116,042 0,699 790 499 393.747 11• auL Ah141.Ce111 too AdmInlatratlve Transfer 0 0 n - 0 0 a. a,u Awtu.mnn 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 111. met9t C4,04 lot subtotal __.....__$207,809 $115,042 $0,608 a_---$7011 _ $499 $393,747 b. Cost Allocated to only P~ 99.Y4% 29.31% 2.46% 104 Other Ino ome (23,994) (10,260) (969) O. 0 -v(36,00(l) 01n Cosl. etlwco,ll, lop BAd Debt EXpenow 3,398 1,448 121 0 0 4,933 alt cwt. mow.co14 toe Ray Roberti Paymento 0 - 0 0 _ Cl 0 0 el. cost. mowcdltl loo For Ray, Dobt 168 Fun 0 0 0 0 0 0 ens cwt. ALw.0e1a 1 110 O O 0 O 0 0 al. cwt. welw.aolh 111 Fbcad ;;l 8;1 92,260 _Y 29,749- 2,232 -_-0- 0 91,260 01- cut, uaw.co111 112 _ Aeneral Fund w - 197,520 80.652 9.721 0 --------o - 274,793 al• Cul. metwcolh_ 110. 0 0 0. __-_-_--0. 0- 0 el A awl. mstmca Ih u~ -HepaymenlloEkatrlo - --30,700 ,13,229 1,104 ---_0 0 - 46,120 o1.Owt.Melw.Oorh 115 sublobtL $290,062 $111,713 $09322 $0 $0 $361,008 a. Cod Allocated to only Wholesale;_ 81,64% -----:18.49% - 100.00% ,la Purchased Watoo 0 - ---i 0 0 $0 $0 0 82. 0w1. Muw.colh u2 Wholesale FWI---_ 0 - 0 o 0 0 ---0 e2. OWL Me11f.0e111 11e Wholesale Sheet Renfa -^^-(42) (27) (2) -63 u_.._.- 39 0 A. all. Aool Odds 110 Wodling Capital _ (10) _ (4) 0) 0 8 (0) e2. awLAlNw.ad1>. 120 iHpreclotlo_nEmpoohe 0 0 W- --0 0 _ 0 - -_-0_ e2-cult aKwaoll. 121 ■ublolat. ($72)L--- ($31) ($a) 1112- $44J------($0) 122 Told Ouslomer Me lot lot cods 627,790 $229,724 $19,910_ $991 644 $774,943 Iae Ay44agaCosVMeberEglMabr _ $21~ $2.00 $1.35~~`u{199 -$=2.89 EXHIBIT HA UTILITY VERSUS CASH BASIS (WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS) r i E f tl k WHOLESALE UTILITY BASIS Costs Included in Retail But Not Included in Wholesale Department 0&M Yee Yes Administrative Transfer Yes Yee Fixed Assets Yes No Bad Debt Yes No Water Rights Yes No Debt service yes No Repayment to Electric Yes No General Fund Rol Yes No I Purchased Water No Yes Wholesale Rol No Yes Wholesale Depreciation Expense No Yes Wholesale Payment in Lieu of Taxes No No Wholesale Street Rental Fees No Yes Rol on Working Capital No Yes C XP Interest No Yes ter:. -46- Y V~J 1 I~ A RATE DESIGN RATE DESIGN 1. SOURCES The water rate design is based on the following sources: COSL of flervice study, development. of revenue targets, and the existing rate structure. 11. METHODOLOGY b Rate design was developed primarily on the revenue requirements calculation and the Cost of Service Study. This results in a recommended overall rate increase of 5.95k for fiscal year 1993, Rate increases for individual customer classes are based on the differences between costs and expected revenues using the current rate structure, For each customer class, the rate increase was generally applied equally to the facility and volume charges currently in use. For residential customers, however, the rate increase was applied only to the first block (0-15,000 gallons). The existing three block summer rate structure waJ retained. Exhibit 1, "Development of Revenue Targets," forms the basis of the ratite design. Costs flow from the Cost: of Service Study and are compared with current rate revenue projections. The revenue shortfalls for each customer class determine the rate increases required. 111. ZUSU ;PS -47- 9 1 Exhibit III, "Water Rate Design Options," is the result of the rate design. Volume flows and revenue at current and proposed facility and volume rates are shown. A. VOLUME LOW (DESIGN W1B AND WIC) ! Water volume flows by 5,000 gallon increments for each customer class are shown for winter, summer, and total volume estimated for fiscal. year 1992. Percentages of cumulative volume expected for each volume increment are also projected. B. REVMME AT CURRENT RATES (DESIGN W2A, W2B AND W1D) Facility charge revenues are shown by meter size for each customer class. Volume revenues in dollars and percentages are shown by 5,000 gallons increments for winter, summer, and total volume revenues. Current facility and volume rates are also shown. C. REVENUE AT PROJECTED RATES (DESIGN W3A, W3B, AND W30 These schedules display the same information described in B above except that the new proposed rates are used to project facility and volume charges. The design W3c schedule summarizes the individual customer anti total costs, revenues, rate percentage increases, and net gain using the recommended rate design structure. Rate increases by customer class are as follows: $gsiderl ial Qo krcial, GQ_v_ Wholesale s l metal Corinth LCMUA 6.111 6.09% 9.95g 0.76 2.58W 5.9W ~sw~rwi IV. BILL COMPARISON Exhibit IV provides a comparison at current versus , proposed rates for each customer class. Tables 1-3 show the impact of the proposed rate increase on residential customers with small., moderate and large water consumption. Table 4 compares the bill of a commercial customer at current and proposed rates. V. COMPARISON OF RATES WITH OTHER CITIES Exhibit V provides a comparison of the City of Denton proposed water rates with Lewisville, Arlington, Carrollton, and Garland. Rates for these cities are estimates subject to change by October 1, 1992. t -49- 1 EXHIBIT III RATE DESIGN i i I r EXHIBIT III RATE DESIGN I f r' I. f ' \1 1 BILLING DETERMINANTS (DESIGN W1a, W1b, W1c) ~4 y R091592.WK1 - Fkid DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILMES DF'SIaH--wl. WATER 6 WASTEWATER STUDY WATER RATE DESIGN OPTIONS WA'retl FlUINGOEIERMINANTS I :AL `I^"7 1992-1993 commwela, q;AUA tilllings'- - - - - - 0.75 Inch 760,527 12,502 449 173,076 1100 Inch 3,583 105 86882 I 1.50 Inch .-_--2_3911_ -_._-2,739_ _-_112 5,239 ____2.00 Inch 1,095 5,991 479 7,205 3,00 Inch 672 167 _ 659 4.00 Inch 4" 52 551 6.00 Inch 61 7 12 60 { - 6_00 Inch 51 63 10.00 Inch 10 Todl 188,801 5743_ _ 1,381 T 12 12 130001 88112% 13.16% 0.71% 0.01% 0.01% t00A0% Winter Voium2LNOV`AprOt}Q's)__~ 4.9" 1001472 8,437 _ S93 107,305 f*F - - - 245,687 9,314^ 622 265.823 0 10,OW _14.998 121,998 7526 1311x629 -.5.000 _ 19 N b2 i164 ,86% 20AN 24.09!. --Za,OJO 10,257 640 -_667126 25,000 28,99!- 15_260 10,316 715 262'.1 30,000 34,999 9,444 v 91147 676. I9,266 35,000 _ 19x90 0,015 10,5&1 740 075 14,140 _45,J00_ 49 2,570 10,030 1.1027 h.-21 50.000 OVE 10,851 676_580 04L399 _ 79,817 65 }S91 1.`965i5i_ TOTAL 696,032. 971,350 _ 41,706 79,611 ",591 ~11111,298 Summer Volume~May_ Oct 000'x) 4,999_ 73,192 6,114 460 76IA26 5'000 205,702 6,-071_ 6611 14,042 70 11,688 189,626 91611 756 170,916 10,510 826 127,148 '--20,000 24,11" _ 43.951 W. 11,603 918 99,172 ,~6 _ - 29 - 64,896 11,984 11,167 _ _ 350,_00 39) --_---63.7,15 11,046 $28 . 45 - 40.000 44A" 11,629 763 38,378 _W 45,600 49,11" !19,782_, 11'068_ 878 967721_..-..- 56`!9...-_ 124,76?_ iw,m-- 1,.,3000,M TOTAL 144 124,782 68609 2_252,624 Total Volume 000'6: 12,611 6599 T__-- 130, 14010110 T-___290,978. 9,253 1'243 311,544 15,00 19147,954 21,197_ 15 199,788 25.000 2f.9Bf 79.956 22,2" y~ 1403 103,856 1,500 60,301. 1f9 ,_39,760 21,599 -_-_.----1.293 621 AOy000 - 44989 _ x0.051 _ 21,003 1!70 b26~15 45,000 40,►.~II _22,352 T 21,118 45 T5 _-__._50 OL00 __-OVE1 76509 'I p~ls3t4 175J 2,30,736 TOTAL t_ 03,799 ,0371.669 -103.650 _204,343 175,199 4,027,116 -50- S DENTON MUNICIPAL, UTILITIES VLs10A(_Mb WATER & WASTEWATER STUDY WATER RATE DESIGN OPTIONS' WATER FILLING DEIEHMINA14TS R091692.WK3 - Anal (COW"tawd) FISCAL YEAR 1Q@ 2 _ 1893 TdmFrd-III -Bommac~sT'(~-C;wsrrmsr 91ia'esnTa - 74Tn7 el M-11 MI111 - - C WCN L_ yW0,VVG~ Corlrt?i j~eas Note- "sakes the volune ul wst LCMUA _~C_Tdel tfOOi~S'"6tR31~fecN11T Winter Volume Factor(Nov-Apr 000's): - - - 4,999 _ 352,260 50.875 _ 6 b 405,663 6'000 9,999 151,721 _ 19,187 - 2097 _.___5 193,002 10,000 14,899 10,165 93,749 1,828 5 5 93,712 15,000 I9A99 19,397 28,773 1,677 _ 5 5 so,82Y ,000 24.909 9,52:2 26,91@ 1,490 5 5 31,940 ' 9 --_-.-5,181 24,605 1,335 5 b 31.112 - 30.000 J_Oe4 22,906 1,243 5 5 27243 `-35,000 JBA@8 7,805 -1232 1,165 b 40,000 --.__-_-5 24,392 44,999 1,340 19,493 f,096 b b 22pJ9 45_000 ~-49.809 960 le_eM9 897 ...-_..--_6 5---__20,668 60,000 OVE _ 2,451 _ 613.743 - _20,148 _ 78-'.567 65,541 977,451 ,p TOTAL. - 596,032 9'71,350 41,706 79.617 --__65,691 1,7/4,288 Summer Volume Factor MaxZoct 000 4 '0 ; - - ' <,999 _370.454 --370.4 54,764 3,013 6 42a,2so 5'000 _ Y.999 --210.603 43AU `2.384 ------5 `-•--'--6 _ 266,102 ._10'000 _T 14,@96 _ 117,7.60 _.._16,000 19,999 _ 68.1@6 54.742 1.883 5 _ 5 404,831 20,000 24,996 43,303 31,641 5 5 - - - _ re 546 25000 _ 29 A89_ 29~2f6 _ 26p1_5 5 __-69.676 '10,000 34,499 18,6%8 29,851 1432 S- 5 46,699 35,000 ---39,999 12_602 - 25,141 1,313 5 5 39,066 40,000 44,998 6.835 --___23,&44 1,213 _ b 6 33,962 45AW _ 49,998 8,253 22,111 1,209 5 5 29,4144 50,000 OYE 14,158 - 736,371 l 46,918 _ 1241792 68,550 1,011,136 TOTAL ---.__-907,787 1,069,61@ 64,U1 174,762 8B,N08 2,252,820 Total Volume Faotor(Ma, -0rt ooo'sj:__ -____-±.g)2 ---722,704 1e5,42e 6,841 10 10 _es3,1e4 5,000 9,989 371,501 63,09 1 4.491 10 459.183 10.000 14j99 _ `_t85,448 _22,352 _ .-72'152_ 3,929 10 10 - 241,_148 15,000 19,Ky 47,683 84_515 _--3560 10 -__155.858 20,000 _._.-02,825 58,492 3, 17fl 10 2 5.000 It 33,427 53,48_0_ _ 2,653 10 10 69,780 30,000 - 34 A89 21,88q _ 48,757 2'~5 ._.~..._10 __--10 74,112 35,090 ul.?99 Y----14,5501 401173 -----2,476 10 10 63.4168 40,000 44A119 10,1_16_ _ _ 43437 p.JB ' - f0 f0 - 50,001_. ~5A00 46A99 '7,213 40,880 2,207 10 --_1U 4_. SoAft OVE 60000 72.488--_ 2_01,289 _ _17_5099 1.LY8,589_ Tot AL 1,503,798 - 2_007.699 - 105,850 204,389 175,198 4.027,1 18 Whnleeele CnPutity AtloOetl (TD)'--_.-- m -.SI- 1 DENTON MUNICIPAL. UTILITIES DESlax-wfe ~ WATER 6 WASTEWATER STUDY WATER RATE DESIGN OPTIONS WATER BILLING DETERMINANTS 44mu14flve Perneff W Volu Flowing nwaLvri arwkefs RD01692.WK3 - Flnei FISCAL YEAR f992-1993 An'tf -Bommera a wave Farr At ewT L P wRNL ;JLL WCN WIF, ate` _.-O I-WGV)__c mLrAb___ kqY A jI__~ Winter Volume Factor_{Nov_Apr Cumulative Percen 4,999 59.10% 6.22% 6.30% 0.01% 0,01% 22.86% 6,000 ese9 --_084456% 56% 9.25% na3x D.D1- o.ol% 33.74% - - - - - -~_A 10,000 11,900 02.84% f2J2% _ 10,000 -_0_02% 0,02% - 38.48% 15,000- 10,999 95.89% 15.76% 19.74% _0:03% 0.02% 41112_% _-20,000 24,999 97,49% 16.56%23.31% _0.03% 0.03% _ 43:16% 25,000 - 29,099 9685% -i 21.09% -_2851% 0.04% 0.04% -4511% 30,000 34,999 0647% 23.45% 29.49% 0.04% 0,01% 46.15% 49% 5% 35,000 39,999 9920% 25.64% 32.29% 0.05% 0105% 48.52% 40,000 44,999 99.43% 27.68% 3421% 0.06% 0.05% 498"% 45,000 49,999 9959% 29.N1% 3%80% 0.06% 0106% 5055% 1 50,000 OYL 11!,00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.01% e Summer Volume Factor Ma -Oct_Cumulativ_e Percent~;_ 4,999 40.91% _6.13% _CM - 0,00% 0101x_ 18,01.93 I 5,000 9,999 ~..-65.03% 9125% 4.43% 0.01% 0.01% - 30.82% 10,060 140999 77,96% 1247% 1110% 0.01% 0.02% - 3744% --15_000 - 19,999- $SA8%-.- 19.13% 14.94% _ --_0,02% _ 0.02% 42.49% ` 20'000 24,999 _-9023% 19.09% 1727% ^ 0.02% 0.W% - 45.89% - 25,000 29,999 _-.93.34% _ -21.79% 0.02% 0.03% 48A9% 30,000 34,999 95139% _ 2481% 2.1.87% 0.03% 0.04% 5057% 30.000 39,099 9640% _29.67% 23,92% 0.03% 0_04% -62,31% 40,000 44,999 97.75% 2844% 25.90% _ 0.04% 0.05% 53.0% 45,000 49,M 08A4% 3086% 21.10% 0.04% 0.06% 65.12% 0,000 OV[ 100.00!1 100.00% 100.00% 100.OD% 100.00% 100.001% 3.27% 13.00X, Total Volumo Factor Cumulative Percen 1,909 46.06% 5.17% 5.33% O,10% 041% 20,70% 5,000 - 9,990 72.77% _---._9.25% ---9.51% 0.01% _---^0.01% 32.11% 10,00 1409 83.77% 1240% 1329% 0.01% 0.02% 39,11% 16,000 _-_-18,0941 99.69% 15.97% 85% 0109% 4197% _ 20,000 24,999 93:11% 1944% 19.05% 0.02% 0,01% -44A2% .-.--Y26,f)00 29,999 _-0533% 21.46% _--_22_35% 0,00% _ 0.03% -_--47.05% _Y 30,000 _.-34,990 _-96.71% 23.00% - 2147% _^-0.03% _ 0.04% 4849% 35,00 39,099 M 07.74% HAS% 2721% 0_041, 0.051A 0.461A 40,000 44,999_ _~.88A2% W 28.31% 29,45% - 01"% 0106% 6185% _4SA00 -4_9,999 ----08.90% - 3044% --_31 b4% 0.00% 0108% 53.10% _110,000 ~()VL -100_00% 100.00% 100.00% ----100,0% 100.00% 100.00% -52- i CURRENT WATER RATES AND VOLUME/REVENUE (DESIGN' W2a, W2b, W 1 d, W 1 e) I h h DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILI'T'IES DESIGN-IV2a WATER & WASTEWATER 8YUDY WATER RATE DESIGN OPTIONS Cunene R0016V2.WK3 - Ffnd C11RRr:NT WATER RATE,, _ FISCAL YEAR 1002-1003 Li._LWA W~~ (om,V67W-~-cTwerrrne RATES; HL fwa. cNL -frrnr-ess~e=--=tq eA;-e- Facilit -Pha_ges;~ - _ 0.75 Inch 5825 1.o0~1n h- 317.20 $12.30 9.tr1 18.85 $191 `1_50 Imh - 13.65 - 14-_'_~_ - 21 Ap 1895 13.18 2.00 lrroh _ 15.65 16.14 _ 24.30 10.10 _ .,___.3300 fncll _ _ - ?2.85 4.00 Inds---"- 61.76 _`___68x0 - _ II4, 55 v 92.65 - 66,45 6.00 luclr _ - 112.48 11730 - 1 f 6.65 i,00 Incb - _ _ $170.00 148__02 Avp.l14'linp 166.90 f38.2b f155.00 - DarrwndChar M.43 ____$23.31 -=-524,83 'i64.63 Bea/1,1100 of Cepw tv 3155.00 f170.00 Winter Volume Rates/7,000; --ON - i32i a7~ $10.52 + 5,000 p~699 _ $222 - $2.50 _-__~_s2]5 0.90 2•n _ _ 0'~ _ $226 Ii .w 10,000 14,909 2-..-~ _2 35_ o.p0 - 1 ~ -..__2.22 _ 2.60 0.90 2.2t 16,000 I- f~ - 2.35 ..._.0.00 _ 0.90 _ 2,22. 2.50 2.34 235 25'~ 24"99 2.22 -2.50 0.80 O,BO 2.39 2.3,000 _ - 2.35 29'998 2-~ 0-~ _ G._65 2.42.. _2.50 2,35 _ `14"99 _ _ 2.22 2,50 _ --..__R60 0-90 _ 2.45 .--35"00 2, 35 _ 2.22 _----0--~ O.BO - 2.46 _ 2.60 2.~ 40:000 44,999 - -2.22 _2.60 _ _ 0.90_ 0.90 2.47 _ 2_36 46,000 46.599 2.22 _ '-_2.60 - _ 0--_~ 0.90 ~._2.4,7 2.35 _ cWE - -2_n 2.50 - 0.90 _ oti85 _--2.4a AYOII,000 __.__$222 -.-_-2.35 _--0_90 0.80 - 2.1E Summer Volume Ratea/7 o0q - t2'~o 1__--32.35 - - $09o - $0 $2_25 4869 - _ 222 3250 32J5 6.000 __.._a-5" -__2.21. 2.50 $0.80 - _ 3090 _ 5228 10,000 14"90 __.__._._.,?_35_ 0- - 30.84_ y 2.2/ 2.72 - _ ` 18,000 -._--~iP,90y 2=-~ 2.36 ,_._0.80 U.DO _ _ 3,35 2.60 - 228 '_?0,000 24"89v _ 3,35 _2.60 2.35 0.80 ---0.90_ ~ - - ~.05 _ 2`-35 - 2b,000 29"98 3.'K '-__2.50 -L_~.- 0-so 0.90 _ 2,88 _ 2.35 _--30,000 -_.-`4.20 2.60 0.90 _ O. BO _ 2.81 _ 2.35 _)5,000 39,999 -2.60 0-~ 0.80 3.17 IO,000 44"99 - - 2.35 0.90 0.80 _ 4.20 _ _ 2.50 3.D/ _~45~000 4$"09 _ 0:90 0.90 _ 4.20 2.60 2,94 2,35 50.0011 OVE O.BO 0,90 -2.85 AVtl11,000 _-d2b~ _ 2.50 ----_.._.?.35 0.90 ^--V-_0-~ -_2.1$ -----•_.__$2a0 _$2.35 f0.90 _ _ 30AO f2J5 -53~ 3 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES 0E3laN-W2b WATER a WASTEWATER STUDY Current WATER RATE DESIGN OPTIONS EXISTING, WATER TEST--YEAR REVENUES FISCAL. YEAR 1982-1993 11091692.WK9 - Plod asTdenIraT--' -"COniinara a rW&Roram 1T~f -1VFm- a TS ~jMlA WRI,i~~_ VC WCN]~- I ~C~WG_ P2~L-.__Cwrrtti Ll_LJl1A `_~C_Tt~lal REVENUES: Faail Char_~~e Revenues: 0. /5 rruh 31 21 43 s21so34 - - ---A x-. 35 2J ss 41 605 1.00 60,901 97,193 1,43 u 119497 1.50 Incir 33 4.1 3R 59.710 i tge 95 041 2.00 Inch 57,137 136,291 9,149 - 164,577 So9 Ir c> - - - - - - - ._.___---,200 10,902. - -_67,102 _ 4_00 rrwh 57,160 4,618 pIA7e 8.00 loch 9 995 _---117 2,010 11#42 8.00 huh - _9,612 _._--_760 10572 Tool ---11,422,518 $601.058 334,b40 37,980 12,040 =?,862074 Demand L:he OSe/1,000 of Cepeohy ---3233,000 1164,000 13397,088 Aven2e84--> $9,43 $23.31 $24.63 $19,572 113,937 $12.55 VOLUME REVENUE'S: Winter Revenuer: --L 6,000 j1 ®g $ 791995 28i7_,177 5 -.-_5 _ =81I,u 6e 97917 4,929 5 6 _35%690 70,000 14,099 104,071 64,371 4,2% 5 G 195,,647 - - 847 15000 _ flA99 42,894 32 _~.1 H2- 6 _ 5 7_21,,;171 20#00 - _ 24,949 21239_ - 84 _ FA2 6 ---__--5 _ 91.914 25AW v 29,899_ 11,461 81,613 3,138 u_-~- 5 -----6 78,119 30,000 34,8!! _.B 946 67,263 __-2~1 _-_-.~.--6 - 6 _ 67,042 35,000 _ 38,8!8 _ --4,407 _ 63,080 2,736_ 6 - 5 60,233 _ 40,000 ` _"A" - 2,076 461733 - A_ 2x594 - 6- - 5. 56,282 45#00 - 41,49 2,131 2,344 g ----5 61.20_0_ b0#00 OVE 6.441 1,709,359 81,"9 711610 76#.27 1,024.846 s tow 1 721 181 $2 1426374 - _ ~8e 008 - 171 6 577,032 3988 281 Aveape 84-> $15,76 3193'" $148.27 $11,943 1 AJO $41.13 Summer Revenues: ,$B9 $822,407 $1.78,$85 $7,060 $5 Ss -s9BD,3`e1 5.0000 _ 9,999 4a6,oli - X099 5.e2e - 5 - 5 603.17 ia,oo9 _ 144'" - 2so,a16 liesoe ^+,9u7 6 - 6 --391,773 16 W0_ 34,899 - 2ze,456_ _-_--89#54 - 4,428 -.-..-__g. 010,745 20,000 ,065 - 7E 3 BB7 5 ,9!9 146 --_-24 - 27.7 !02 -__~25i000 ?8289 94,680 _ --B 17P 47r 30,000 34#08 Te,o18 6 148,620 35,000 39,899 62,829 _ 82 - 6_ _ _118677 40,000 _ 37,L~ --~=8 _ 2s~e2, -__3 s - ~9apea 45 000 40,4" - 6 75,426 2,541 5 _ 6 $4,642 O1fE _ 59,485 1,H8,P17 _ f 09,951 11? 268 $0,602 202,1 W RuhbW $2.282417 /2±96612:6 3150,739 $142#04 f60,e47 35,302605 _ Avaepe 39-> $27.04 1200.76 1206,49 349,717 -113,441 $53.67 Total Volume Revenues: 535,267 I! 1B --3 1 , A8l1, t 2`+9 ~b,000- -924,032 -_707,703 tOb54 - B 9 ~207 1~_ 145!! 397,288 190,$30 33 p i- 9 557,420 15,000 19" 271,450 _ 181,2!6 81387 9 141,12?. 201000 ~24*0 186y204 _540,164 25A"- 290" -~106,14e -.._1 726. 0,IT5 0 9 _ 246,695 T 70500 3+.899 _ 6/964 124,393___ - 8,267 -__9 9 -215,662 3S A000 _JD 8`88 _ - 6- 71!-35_ 116.933 -6x924 -----9 179J 10 ---OX-)D -~449L08 - 40,064 10451,592 6,886 1 60 + 4i,$"- - 24,385 102,149 _ 5_136 • _ - _ ® 3:5,719 b0`000 64 ,!06 7,860,285 -170.3011 ---_Ie~,INB 157,WB 4,126,049 SubbLd '-35A1e`0041 -$5,091,672 $240,746 -~31871850 _ $167,879- ' 39,301,067 $21.42 1107.54 _ $178.83 _ $16,3.70 $13,140 $47.45 'x07#1 REVEiNUEB-{SyUSe~-Z5,6i6, 129 - (26534 {41e,81i•~-$327,718 011,760^090 AdluMm6ln to Fate"M 1.04% 0.03% 0.11% - 1.61% 0.12% 3.w% Forwent 6,441,849 6,607,155 283,602 425,420 324,120 12,174,546 Ann98616-> S1M$5 $220.97 3200." 134,002 $26077 $80.00 ••54- f i 1 405,323 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES UESIGN-Wfd WATER a WASTEWATER STUDY WATER RATE DESIGN OPTIONS I INATER HIL1.ING DETERMINANTS Cun ,Rplve Pervert d Curren nmvrBr Cdfeded T7ro-66 17WWu _ FISCAL YFAfI fBB2--1893 ,~~=tee Fl081692.WK3 F - Flnel ~n'~6 [;weirune7t- F~la Tdel II ~~W=.~._.1E fN_O Yf CiNV[-__ ~=x11th Winter Revenues Collected Noy-A r Cumulative Percent. _ 1538% 62.10% SIAM 2336% F6al41y Clwrpa_ 3410% 10.73% 51$7% - 40.69% 1538% 4,999 7336% 51 A6% 4932% 82.11% 9,gT9 b921% 11199% 25.1 5,000 -----'""-`--4% - 5397% 9521% 22.09% 28.85 101 51,68 10 .000 11 ,999 - ~ 24 A2% 32;1 02.11% 51A8% 55.40% 15,000 18,999 _ 9732% - - "5- - 62.12% 61 E6X, 67.161, 24,999 0638% 2730%- _3526%, 20,000 62.12% 5119% 66.62% 29,999 81123% 25.00 ---2956% 5.66% Itl.4N% 62.12% 51 A9% - 5991% . 6% 30,000 - 34,999 9926% 3 /2.83% 61.69% 6196% 99.411% 33.01% 2% 35,000 38,989 _ 69.83% 35.44% 45.05% 62.13% 40,00 44p" - 99.13% - 03.10% 45 - .00 48,998 99)3% 37.16% 47.0796 82.13% 51w%. 00-00% _ WE 100 100.00% Summel Revenues Collected SMay =0ct [:r Cumulative Parcen ^61,5z+ i -"-"19.o1x oANY Chv os 23.76% 1_0.4_0% I l:/itt - 33.77% 5033% f - 9734% 13.69% 1922% 51.12% 50.73X, 4296% 5,000 9,989 - 6033% 7599% 4651% I 10.000 999 24.70% 60)4% 63:19% 51.12% 16,000 ,N9 93 24A5% 58% 2756% 21.02% - 61_13% _ 60.74% 59.13% 20,000 - 25,000 29,899 __J 9158% 55.13% 01.76% 30,000 32.16% SL53% 50.74% 83,58% 9592% 3429% 32Aa% -.-_50.75% 35,000 38,999 _ - - 60.76% 65.07% 40_000 3627% 3 00 8692% 38.13% 3830% 51.14% _ SOAS% _--6837% _ 46000 49,980. -50,000 _100.00% 106_00% 100.00% Total Revenues Collecied Cumulative P4~rcnntL_ 1% _ 2823% 1055% ._r.-12.79% 08:06% 51-29% 209- 3891% -1.1.17% 9'~ 56.011% 4,988 80.03% 45)3% Sb_06X 6130% 5,000 76.45% 5530% 60,52% 1~_. 2200% 23$6% 60.OF% _ 0_000 14A~ 63.74% - _ 24,93% 26,91% 66n9% 51.30% 5427% 16.000 59A~ $9.13% - - 68.19% 27AQ% 20AS% 56.09% 6137% - 20,000 24998 _ _ 92,42% __-76% 68.09%, ^-_91.11% 25000 ~ 29.199 0453% 29 8..09%8022% 34.03% 6 _5137% 9621% 31.93% 30.000 _ 94 199 6131% 62.44% 3_9,999 9735% 3327% 36.09% 95.100 63,10% 5532% - 83.75% 40-000 44.198_ "__9l.16% _.---35$7K 5% 56,10% 5132% 6191% 45,000 49A98 _03.71% ---`37^61% 39.111% - ~ OVE .100.00% 1 W3.00'G v 100.03% 500.00% 100.00% 100.06% _55.. UENTON MUNICIPAL U`T'ILITIES oESION-W10 wATEn 6 waSTEwATER STUDY WATER HATE DESIGN N'AiGRCrnnu BILLING e491FR1rgeNAN7S ntnle~ _ FISGA_ LYFM IB02-t B0 YPFnT- C_Tgip1_ TT-w'et a~rT~} LCYUA _ _ - rrierofel CurlfR~_~ C, *q RUBISB2.wK3 - Flnel -jF~t"~iit1F°7 [ 97215 C=R=wAN)~l -LN-- - f l ,wing Through Each Bracket Nov=At?< --e _ 50,877 GumuletiveWintorWatec Sillings _ ~2at9 _ _ g - 4_9B9 ---___64.024 447 s - - 8 __.23~-- _ 8998 ,59,581 3111 6 _12,519 5000 7,473 8 _ . A~ - 15,787 - 8 - 334 -8,751 14 8 .4 _6.548 - - _ 4 8 955 10,000 - 15 62 295 19!_000 .~^2.578 6 g 9,958 20~ 24A9S - 1,322 -5, 9 _ -2~9 1 - 6 - - 5336 25.000 = .999 - - - - 31A9B 785 -.__-4~2 -22-1 8 8 4,H1 30,E 414 4' 9 _ 27x7 `B 4,495 35,000 --------39 314 4,37 J --'7i4 -4,178 44 A" g 40_~006 ,998-_--- 3`837 45,000 49 - ~ 784 50,000 OYE ach Oct es`~te 730 Cumulative Summef!~ater 9111fnge Fla wtn Thrh E R~$Ok- a~ g - a a9ss4 MT- - 13282 ---8 4989 s;7 - J - 50A41 9 29,195 8,307 5000 9,899 Ili 41 375 'mob- g 17192 14 A" - -`-T.W--8 Igloo 73,442 1'!278 _ r 15,000 18 - 10X+79 8,857 8 - 7.98 _ - IDA" 8 20%100 _24,99Y 8 N9 _ 8`7173 _ 279 v-~ 8 g B ass 26, - 4,493 34??w 6,436 g - 30 2,863 - 242 6,409 35000 39a 2,084 5.109 6 -5'905 44,9W - 4,808 - 8 no I. - 454 ?DO 49.999_ 4,547 - 45.000 - 1036 - - 1B8,D7D 60. Throu h Each Bfac_.kut; 1a. a Flowln _ -g-- 12 tz9,345 87 SlNing~ = _ z5~ - ----9~ I 1z - s3443 G_umulaM_ vv Total Water t5 1,3 999 t99,sG! - i 2 12 709.829 ---'564 799 -'S2 i2 37,713 ....r::,.--. 50009,9pg 15Af0 12 - 33 _ _ 40x10 - -10J 14 _ 2?da3 - 14,077 - 029 t2 1P. - 48,~-. 49.999 _ - 829 - 12 - 20.3.- _ 12,723 X12 _ 1 19,000 13~-167 660 6l534 -.~20J 2---`'- 9.171 11.842 815 - 42 12 S4,OOt 12 25,006 .__?9p99 - 6,254 110741, 52 12274_. 475 72 _ - 3,.17 , 10,5 448 - - 12 - 10~ 12 9'9W 35,000 2_176-- 9'4x6 41.0 _ 12 44 Ago 1-612 BITT 12 -45 , 4BP~ - - _#74 373 7.707 (ONE[ 60.000 -56- MINTON MUNICIPAL U'I'IL,I'rms oeslo7u--w1e WATER 6 WASTEWATER STUDY WATER RATE DESIGN OPTIONS WATER BILLING DEMMINANTS Clr Isllvs Billings RD916112.WK3 Final FISCAL YEAR 1992-1N63__ ('"ITeildsnTfaT- r-Canrner TaT ~C warrrne eT "1VIinTimaTe lr ~4TI~a`a e ~ - IW-~w~ Ml i-_ 'N FI WRN1_~L__ _ -~L.~jN!G WGI,JZ jL C~iritt__JL_._.LCq_UA~~ _TIMeI__ Cumulative Winter Water Bills Flowin_g Thro!jqh_Each Bracket(Nov-Apr~_ 4,989 64,024 12,519 691 6 6 97,215 5,000 9,61" 50,381 6,657 447 8 6 59,677 10,000 14,999 15,783 7,413 371 6 6 2.3,539 15,000 19,999 5,624 6,549 334 6 8 12,510 20.000 24009 2,576 5,689 9 6,751 5,359 ?fit 25J-N 000 29,899 1,.V-2 6 3034,899 765 4912 239 6 g 6 968 3539,999 474 4.6).9 221 6 38 4044AIM -__314 4.917 --204 6 4947 45,49„998 219 1,071 194 6 4,465 50OVE 164 _ 3 937. 165 6 4,176 ti Cumulative Summer Water Billy Flowlng_Throu~h Each Brackot Ma _ 84,760 13,292 790 _6 -6 --~,99A04 5,000 --59;480 9,727 511 E0 _6 69,716 10.000 31,147 9.397 _429- 6 39064 -__15_000_ __.-17270 _7,609 375 0 6 _ 1.6,105 20000 ` __.`.10,519 9,657 331 6 6 17,702 _26,000 _ Y 6,949 W 0.263_ ---^-._6 13_442 30.000 4,403 - 6,799 _.-._278 0 35p00_ '1.,063 5,436 '254 6 6 9,665 40.000 tf44E"9 2,064 51109 242 8 6 7,427 - 45,000 1.454 4,908 9 6,499 50000 - 1,038 4,517 t_.___ 6 Cumulative Total Water BiffiM Flowin Through Each_8racket: - 4,990 166,604 25,600 1391 _ 12 12 196,019 6.000 91999 109,929 16,664 956 _ 12 12 129,395 _..T 10,000 14,999_ 46410 16,610 790 12 _ 12 - 83543 15,000 19,909 A.` 22,903 _N.,. 14,071 _ 709 12 12 ---37,713 20,000 24,099 13,167 620 28,533 26000 29,009 9,171 11,642 660 12 i220.391 30.000 34,999 5,256 10,741 515 _ 12 ISA36 35,000 _-`39,909_ 3,431 _ 10,065 476 12 12_. 14,00t 40,000 44090 429__ 446 12 12 l 12274 45,000 40099 1,672 9,677 /10 12 12 10,863 60,000 OVE 1,202 6,364 373 12 12 9,963 -56- h NEW WATER RATES AND REVENUE (W3a, W3b, W3c) 1' I 5 _1AyS t DENTON MUNICIPAL U'I'II.I'I'IES oesrclp-wad WATER 6 WASTEWATER STUDY WATER RATE DESIGN OPTIONS WATEII FACILITY CIIAIIGE ni-SIGN 1ID91692.WK3 Flnai FISCAL YT-,AB 1092--1993 Ae~ wilj-K-r -Corti'mercTaf ,waalnr4iiTd" L.R. N1-~L_IWL WC Ir T7FiaT'eea"Te~~-N7~uTawii GWGI r -'r{nr ar Q UStU C1xUt11 LCAIUA 7L _ Avaroge mer Accounting Costs: - - t'a. - fJ.94--TT _---_7. TT--- Customer Meter Costs: Per Meter Coe{ f2b7 _ °J s2A~ Meter Equivalent MLIIH fors'F__ rom Schedule Cost-W3e : 7- sla4 0.75 Incl _ _ 1.00 loch ` _ t i.Br ~ - 33 1.87 _ 11.87 .00 2.00 Inch --'-6.17 -1.3.7 - - 1.87 3.00 11 5.93 nch - ti.33 10 4.00 Ineh .8 7 10.8"! 1061. : 7y 6.33 11.77 - 1 ,8x:877 10.67 !.W Inch ,R 8.00 Ineh 5 -,5_ 33.33 - 333x 13._67 53.33 __53J3 W33 .---37.33 Customer Meter Cost: 53 a3 ^ Par BH 0.75 L-n 1.00 -L2b7 - _s 217 _ y 3297 - 1.60 4e _=134 _ _ aa 2,00 8'~ 57 ;:23 - _ 9.57 3.00 1 30'~_*? 1531 4.00 7.15 0.00 4713 22`17 1429 l.00 95_67 85.67 11 - 4713 -33 153.07 44.87 85,87 70.83 _ 71.47 `___193,07 Facility Cher al(Includfn Some Fbxed Costs): _ f.0p 1. 18.45 13.60 50 -.2215.05 2.00 ' 23 SO 5 3.00 - _._'-5 2025 4.00 --.62.76l.00 21 140_00 165.24 - 155.00 1e379 0.75 Irxh _ 8,67% _ Inch 10.51% 1.50 Ind _1028% Y.11% 2.00 rnch -%a7% rw% t0.opx iea2x - 31 OD Inch-._---- `es.ezsr 4.0o Inch -__.=12.7s% X9152% - 8,00 Irx 6.00 nevanuea Cian6rRlarl_ 0.T6 [na, ;140912 - _ 1.00 nc}81.50 7T.2.W 3.u0 3 e64 2e 4.00 60e.00 ch 6,00 817 ch 1,510 59,70a a Orb - row 1 116o sr L1,517616 --_-10 43,536- 32040 . Total HemeinInny -Water Sygtom Costs To Rocover - - -s2zo1,61• iaaz=1992 s4zi1 s72~ ssaeo,r~a [ 329 7ee1 ---L42L has T La30,e06~--310,e5FF,128 -57- DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DESIGN-Mb 1vATER d WASTFWATER SPJOY WATER RATE DESIGN OPTIONS PROPOSED YEAR H RATE DESIGN 1992-1043 1Prio'TeseTs lY}idea eie -T6Furor l H091592.WK3 - Ffnal t~-~~-ricFal-- C4UA___~~ A_veiatle._J C WOTIi_~C.PO~W G.._ L~--Calrth~c L- _ . ~~lN WHN~ RATES: - ' - Faaillty Char $674,60 0.75 Inch--.--- 302,686 ' 5 -F 450,987 IM Irwi1-.- IU.50 202 1.50 Inch MOO 23.50 _ 16.85 - 103,451 2.M nch 15.05 - 73-85 - 16:75 ?.6b5 I -_W-_..----- 5 - 111,825 3.00 Inch 20,036 _ 85 - 4.00 Innh 110.00 92. 170.00 57275 140.00 518.85 55 _ 3,885.911 8.00 Itlrll 1 .00 J 138.25 165.00 - ✓ a m Inch $170.00 _ $15.23 f f8B9 $x4,95 -,528.3) -`-_y155.00 Avp.I9Ak10 - Itenmrd Cher9e611,000 of CapeoTfy Winter Volume Rates/1,001 6_+ -s5 a0s5 $2A3 b0 $09 _ ^ 4,60! $2A0 -_3295 0.95 0.95 2.45 2.40 _ 2.65 2-~ 0,95 tO,OW 14,999 2.40 2.65 ._.-0.~ 0,95 2.55 - 2.6f+ 2.60 _ ^ 16000 /9_99Y x~.'a 2,80 ,95 0.95 2.58 20.000 - 24,998 - 2.40 2__-~ - - 00.85 10% 2 2.62 25,00 2.40 .B5 2.80 0.85 2.40 2~' 0,95 2.63 2.65 35000 2.,0 _ x.60 0.2.63 2 44,098 _ 2.40 2.6D 0.86 2.84 45,000 {9,988 2.40 20.85 2.33 2.86 2.80 OVC 2.40 $095$2.41 6ZA $2.65 AV011,000 - Summer,VolumA Bates/110o0~_r - $z -A1---- - $o.9s -$x~o 4889 $2.40 $x.85 - 0.85 1 _.78 _ 2.80 0.92.95 5-4~ - _9^989 2._~_ O. 09Lffi 0,In10 -14! 2.40 2,90 00--_ 1.24 2.85 _ 16.000 19y991 _ _ 3.3.5 2.80 .96 O.fS .1.21 2.65 . 2.00 J_ 64 3 -_2'~ 2,00 0.0.'i =-~8~6 1_1.31 50 - 4.A _2.65 00 FOBS _ _ 1.64 35000 o~AS ~,t.ti 19,099 0.95 2.66 _ 2.60 - 40AM 44,088 2 2 0.96 1.84 _60 095 - 38 45,000 ,20 0 4-- -7.02 4.20 ?.96 2.90 50,000 OVF.F 22.87 f 2.85 $2.40 $0.95 $095 510 AVG/1,009 -58- 'MR I I DENTON MUNICIPAL, UTILITIES oESrrrM-wx WATER 8 WASTEWATER STUDY rropoaeJ PROPOSED WATER RATE DESIGN OPTION PROPOSED WATER TEST-YEAR RE VENUES RD91592.WK3 - Finof FISCAL YEAR 1892-1993 rf 11eTa r7nn~- oinmeica L ,~w~ernner -}7Fi61 ~Fa I_-IwR,WR1IL, W~,.YJCN1_f_L-~G WGN~~C_wlrttr ~L--,j, y ~CTdel- REVENUES; - r Facility Char e Revenues: _ 0_iTi Inch f1,409yT1e 620086¢ r_ _ - 1.00 Ir9;h _ 54,537 72,151 1 1,680 - 1.50 Inch 35,920 - 1_,.__ 102,275 1!,311 181,185 - 192! - 3,00 Inch - - 40,320 g e84 - 183,855 - Loo Inch - - 50,164 - 4.00 Ins - - -w ie-n 4818 - - s 7oe e, 6,549 417 2,60 11397 ----809 Ird~ _ e1415 - 10,275 Tw.i - 1 x"80 t)wrmnl Char°ayf,00o of Uepoc y $1,517,616 -_=8.13,530 !6!_602 41 A 32040 s2, .e4a Avon°e UNi.-> SeA9 $24.95 $26.31 $156.00 $170.00 $1 VOLUME REVENUES: tu,z3 Winter Revenues: _ _ 4.989 $!45,338 3111,269 WA34 $5 6,000 9,998 $969,469 _ _381,1 19 - 103,792 6,452 5 5 473,373 10,000 14,889 _ 116,938 !9,434 4,753 16000 - IBA99 19,417 7ep94 4,38, 5 A 128,745 20 24,999_ _ 22.451 71,132 :,#76 a 5_ _ 88,066 261180 29,999 _ 12,395 _85,204_ -3.472 6--5 30 !1,071 ,000 Y 34,989 7,401 ~60,101 3.231 b 35,000 _ sop" - 4,184 5 --,__71,343 G8,2B5 _ 3,0.29 5 5 __--64,097 _`40,000 44,8!3 3,217 _62,717 _ 2,648 1 5 5 be,79 _ 45,000 _ 491!89 - 21303 49,525 - 2_593 5 5 51x431 OVE 5.641 1,611,920 --_--9/ASK _ 75 9 2 0{2 _-subbo4w $1,430,370 _ $2,674,071 -$106,430 - _9191 ~f4 ,,64, Avers pe 8)II - > 517.62 -$75,939 3!1,311 4,288,629 Summer Revenues: - sue' ."4,a6i 0?2 -_-_$14509 621.632 116,373 10,000 14,88Y _-.291.404 _ 10.1,289 950,219 15.400_ 19,989 A 228,459 82.065- 4.198 20000 2/0y1_- 146,096 5 325427 25 4109 291p 64 880 6 6i4 ~'3et _ 6 - 5 233 059 _-74,165 _ _ 3,724 6 ~S 162,80 351000 39 6 52,829 66,925• -0,414 -5 ~_40p00 14,964 31.IW 82,191 3,310 .'"-----a ----.12?,877 45,000 600.4 48,899 29.284 4,75j' 3,141 -6 ~~G 69171 1,951362 1ZOi430 _ 119.485 95,090 2,334,01 Awa°sBill-> PAJI) pei $2420054 0$_ J.?A2i2 -276 $1 Be 775 _119 643 _ s 128 _-}5 187 a Total Volume Revenues: _ 4,988 _51,731,359 21399 $14,667 $10 $10 $2,0P8,4311 5000 9,699 191-`761 185 _ 10 , 10'00 14A"_ 391,040 191,7:!2 10,216 - 111 10 - 1,123612 _ 10 599,006 ~8751 211,933 17Q,864 9 ~O_ 1o 455,173 10 331, 123 25.400 28,888 - 107.076 141,746 7.41E 10 v10 6yf 30'00 .--._3I~Y99 65,419 131, L56 ?21,749 36064 -_A 39,988 - 67,892 _122.669 6443 10 10 0 0 197,-043 4.000 ♦<A96- 115 1W - 8 I_ 59 10 101,810 -_4_51000 49398 28,586 10!1276 S 737 _ 10 _ OVE _ _85 40 _a.M3.302 - 10 142,802 186,117 591,01N _188,344 4,377,194 Subtotal _ $3p50.424 $5,400.353 $775,210 _$181,178 $168,4,'19 t9 601 TOTAL REV-NUCO --$A`46-_--•---- 3g:66- 36. - $~;{S -.__.-_"-i igl 6' ~.-.iST7U'l10 r' 38-;Bf.T,>R2" 371711 -;4$9; ' Average BIII-> Imropoo mar Pdd Year 0.11% MW 110% TrAal Coato/Onot d Serviw 9185% 0.7tl% 2.66% 6,90% RavorfCoeta 4-- $5,$10.46 $6,003 3, 7&8 758 $331,398 $/30,1!8 $332,646 !:2,65 $16,436 310,121 ($19,b0.5) (11,147) ($387) $355,,46 4112 -59- 9 EXHIBIT IV RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL BILL COMPARISON i CITY OF DEN'S ON WATER UTILITY CURRENT VERSUS PROPOSED RATES - Proposad Current Rele Scltedulo Rates .-,--.Rates Resiclentlal WR & NJRN e 80 8,25 314' Meter 10.50 9.80 1' Muter 16.00 14.00 i 112' Meier 16.75 15.66 2' Meter 2.40 2.21 ~ All Gallons Block Rate - Winter 2.40 222 3.35 First Block Rate - Summer 3 ,35 Second Block Rate Summer 4 20 4,25 Third Block Rate - Summer Residential outside Corporak~_ Limits==WRE 11.15 11.16 314' Meter 12,25 12.25 1' ~r8 16.70 16.70 1 112' Meter 20.00 20.00 2' Meter 2•~5 All Gallons Block Rate - Winter 2.95 p 95 2,95 First Block Rate Summer 4.00 4,00 Second Block Rate - Summer 5,00 6.00 Third Block Rate - Summer Comm erclallndustrlal - WC "P-N- 3/4' 1845 1720 Me 20.26 18.85 1' Maier r 2.3.50 21.80 1 112' Meter 28,85 24.30 2' Meter 60.00 68,75 3' Meter 110,Q0 114.55 4' Meter 140.00 147.30 6' Meter 165.00 166.90 e' Meter 2.65 2.60 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons Commercial outside Corp qte Limits - E 18.55 18,65 14' Meter 20,60 20.60 1' Meter 1 25.95 25.95 1 112' Mater 29.60 29.60 2' Meter 87.90 87.90 3' Meter 147,40 147.40 4' Meter 188.90 188.90 6' Meter 214.05 214.05 8' Meter 3,15 3.16 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons Wholesale WW1 &--WW2 155.00 155.00 Facility Charge WW1 170,00 170.00 Facility Charge WW2 1942 20.00 WW1 Demand/1000 Gallons 27,34 27.40 WW2 Demand/1000 Gallons 04862 0,4719 Readiness to Servo/i000 Gallons 095 0,90 Volumo Charge/1000 Gallons -60- 1~yy 7 j CITY OF DENTON WATER UTILITY CURRENT VERSUS PROPOSED RATES i Rata Schedule Proposed Current Rates Rates I Government - WG 3/4' Meter 13.60 12.30 1' Meter 15.05 13,65 1 1/2' Meter 18,65 16.95 2' Meter 23.65 19.10 3' Meter 52.75 58,30 4' Meter 92,6,. 92.65 6' Meter 116,1,5 116.65 8' Meter 1'1625 136.25 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 2.60 2,35 Local Government Irrigatlon - WGI 3/4' Meter 13.60 18,30 1' Motor 15.05 20.30 1 1/2' Meter 18.65 26.76 2' Meter 23,65 30.85 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons (Interruptible) 2.20 2.35 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons (Non-Interruptible) 2.60 2,35 Sprinkler Charge Per 100 Square Feet 0.0D 1.00 Adopt A Spot WGA 3/4' Meter {Billable 3 times annually) 8.80 0.00 1' Motor 10.50 0.00 1 1/2' Meter 15.00 0.00 2' Meter 16,75 0,00 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 2.60 0.00 Governrnent Raw Water WGU Facility Charge-- 142,00 142.00 Volume Charge/1000 Gailons 1.40 1.40 Metered FI q ant_•- WFH Fadity Charge 30,00 27.60 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 2,65 2.60 Deposit 650.00 650,00 Installation Charge 50.00 45,50 •-61- y I l I i 1 RESIDENTIAL WATER IMPACT OF RATE INCREASE ON RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS USING 3/4' METERS PROPOSED CURRENT A. AVERAGE CUSTOMER RATES RATES A) 10,000 GALS/MONTH (SUMMER) 1. FACILITY CHARGE $8.80 $8.25 2. VOLUME CHARGE 24.00 22.20 1 " 3. TOTAL $32.80 $30.45 4. CHANGE a) In Dollars $2.35 b) in Percent 7.72% B. LARGE CUSTOMER B) 20,000 GALS/MONTH (SUMMER) 1. FACILITY CHARGE $8.80 $8.25 2. VOLUME CHARGE 52.75 50.05 3. TOTAL _ $61.55 $58.30 4. CHANGE a) In Dollars $3.25 b) In Percent 5.57% -62- J 1 Aue I I I RESIDENTIAL. WATER PROPOSED CURRENT C. EXTRA LARGE CUSTOMER RATES RATES C) 30,000 GALS/MONTH (SUMMER) 1. FACILITY CHARGE $8.80 $8.25 2. VOLUME CHARGE 86.25 83.55 3. TOTAL $95.05 $91.80 a. CHANGE a) In Dollars $3.25 a) In Percent 3.54% -63- S { CpMMERCIAL WATER_ PROPOSED CURRENT 1 HATES RATES $20.25 $i 8.85 J. FACILITY CHARGE 106.00 100-00 2. VOLUME CHARGE 6 5 $118.85 3. TOTAL i 4. rHANGE a) In Dollars $7.40 6.?.3% b) in Percent SAGE DATA;. A. Facility charge sud on i` meter. B. Volume charge based n 40,000 gallon consumptlon. -64- -T I h ~a 1 J EXHIBIT V COMPARISON OF RATES WITH OTHER CITIES 3 t EXHIBIT V COMPARISON OF RATES '.R WITH OTHER CITIES lwpw,- Apr ~ j i WATER RATE COMPARISON WITH OTHER CITIES RESIDENTIAL AT 35,000 GALLONS I AT 10,000 AT 15,000 SUMMER WINTER CITY GALLONS GALLONS MAX- OCT N0V--APR 1. ARLINGTON $25.02 $35.62 $78.02 $78.02 2. CARROLLTON $34.32 $50.59 $115.67 $115.67 9. DENTON a) Current Rates - Summer $30.45 $41.65 $112.80 $85.95 b) Current Rates - Winter $30.45 $41.55 - c) Proposed Rates - Summer $32.80 $44.80 $116.05 $92.5 d') Proposed Rates -Winter $32.80 $44.80 - 4. L.EWISVILLE $32.63 $45.26 $95.78 $95.78 5. GARLAND $19.24 $26.14 $56.14 $56.14 COMMERCIAL AT 40,000 AT 100,000 CITY GALLONS GALLONS 1. ARLINGTON $88.62 $215.82 2. CARROLLTON $139.24 $251.34 3. DENTON a) Current Rates $117.20 $267.20 b) Proposed Rates $124.45 $283.45 4. LEWISVILLE $108.41 $259.99 4. GARLAND $62.84 $143.24 -65- r a I ORDINANCES r h AGENDA ITEM #6 - 9129192 Denton MUricipal Utilities FY 1993 WASTEWATER RATE STUDY EDIENTON TEXAS DadIcated to Quality S/IVICA / ~LL 9 ! COST OF SERVICE AND WASTEWATER RATE DESIGN FISCAL YEAR 1993 M r e pr,je ti,ARED FOR DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD DENTON CITY COUNCIL i SEPTEMBER 1992 R. E. NELSON, Executive Director Department, of Utilities 7 t TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PAGE NO. L INTRODUCTION 1 H. METHODOLOGY 1-3 M. RESrJLTS 3 IV, IMPACT OF RATE INCREASE ON RESIDENTIAL, CUSTOMERS 34 V. IMPACT OF RATE INCREASE ON COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS 4 VI. COMPARISON OF RATES WITH OTHER CITIES 5 REVENUE REQUIREMENTS 1. SOURCES 6 IL r +THODOLOGY 6-7 III. USE OF UTILITY BASIS FOR WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS EXHIBIT I - REVENUE TARGET 8 COST OF SERVICE L SOURCES 9 II. METHODOLOGY 9-13 EXHIBIT II - COST OF SERVICE 14-39 EXHIBIT ILA - UTILITY VERSUS CASH BASIS 40 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) RATE DESIGN PAGE NO. 1. SOURCES 41 II. ME'Z fIODOLOGY 41 III. RFSULTS 42 IV. BILL COMPARISON 43 V. COMPARISON OF RATES WITH 43 OTHER CITIES EXHIBIT III - RATE DESIGN 4446 EXHIBIT IV - BILL COMPARISON 47-55 EXHIBIT V - COMPARISON OF RATES 56 WITH OTHER CITIES EXHIBITS 1. DEVELOPMENT OF REVENUE TARGET 8 II. COST OF SERVICE, --y' 14-37 HA. UTILITY VERSUS CASH BASIS 3540 III. RATE DESIGN 4446 IV. BILL COMPARISON 47-55 V. COMPARISON OF RATES WITH OTHER CITIES 56 RATE ORDINANCES F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 WASTEWATER RATE STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION A wastewater utility rate study has been conducted to determine the rate increase necessary to meet the revenue shortfall shown in the revised 1993 wastewater department budget, An upgrade of the wastewater treatment plant to meet EPA regulations, combined with collection system improvements, and other regulatory driven programs required a significant increase in wastewater rates. In addition, the relative strength of wastewater discharge from certain customer classes impose increased me to costs on the wastewater system and require larger increases. The Cost of Service model was used to complete this rate study was the same model used for the fiscal year 1992 study. II, METHODOLOGY The 1993 wastewater rate study was conducted following i basic three step process: A. REVENUE REQUIREMENTS A key foundation of the rate study is the determination of revenue requirements which drives the overall level of rates needed to meet financial. -1- A goals. The cash revenue requirement for the City includes an overall financial goal of at least 1.25 debt coverage ratio and a 6W return on investment to General Government. Exhibit I reviews how revenue targets were developed for. 1993. Expenses, revonues and net gain./loss are shown by customer class. Revenues and net gain/loss are displayed both without a rate increase, and with a proposed rate increase of 14.0W. H. COST OF SERVICE STUDY A study of the cost of service involves the allocation of total cost to various customer classes of the wastewater utility system. When the Cost of Service Study is completed, an appropriate adjustment in rates is made to individual customer classes bases on relative revenue and cost estimates. The output from the Cost of Service Study can be found n Exhibit II. C. RATE DESIGN After the revenue requirements and cost of service tasks have been completed, cost information is available for design of wastewater rates for each customer class of service. Separate rates are designed for facility and volume charges. h -2- I The results of the rate design can be found in Exhibit III. III. RESULTS Analysis of existing wastewater rates indicates fiscal year 1993 revenues of $6,415,132 and expenses of. $6,906,463, for a lose of $491,331. With rates as proposed in the attached document, wastewater revenue would be increased by 14.00% to $7,313,262, resulting In a net gain of x406,799. The proposed new wastewater rate would increase the bill of a 9,800 gallon per month residential customer from $20.02 per month to $23.62 per month, an increase of. $3.00 per month, or 14.55%. A summary of rate increases by customer class is shown below. Commercial Commercial Commercial Residential _Rg.gm1ar Eatinct i--ment ~14.81V 15.60% 18.75W 18.34W vernmen Ind a Wholesale Total. 15.68% 15.62$ -12.43W 14.00k IV. IMPACT OF RATS INCREASE ON RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS Current and proposed rates and bill comparisons for residential customers are illustrated in Exhibit IV. Exhibit IV, Table 1, compares the bill of an average residential customer_ in 1993 at current and proposed rates. The comparison represents customers with monthly wastewater discharges of 9,800, 15,000 and 30,000 r k 1 r \ gallons. The proposed rate increase would result in an increase for the 15,000 gallon customer of $4.30, from $29.20 to $33.50, or 14,731. Exhibit IV, Table 2, compares the bill of a very large residential customer with 30,000 gallons of wastewater discharge per month at current and proposed rates. Each customer's monthly bill would increase from $53.95 to $62,00, for an increase of $8,05, or 14,92W. I V, IMPACT OF RATS INCREASE ON REGULAR COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS Table 3 compares the bill of a regular commercial customer with a water consumption of 40,000 gallons and a monthly discharge of 32,000 gallons of wastewater effluent (S0%- of water consumption). Added to this class were the Metered Sewer and Commercial industry customers, The total monthly bill on increases from $79,55 to $91.40, an increase of $11,85 per montO, jr 14.9H. VI. IMPACT OF RATE INCREASE ON EATING PLACES Exhibit IV, Table 4, compares the bill of a typical. restaurant. For a monthly discharge of 80,000 gallons of wastewater effluent., the total bill on current rates is $239.65 versus $285.00 on the proposed rates, an increase of $41-.35 or 18,92W. VII. IMPACT OF RATE INCREASE ON EQUIPMENT FACILITIES Exhibit IV, Table 5 provides a similar analysis for a typical car wash company with average monthly water consumption of 250,000 gallons, For a monthly discharge -4- of 200,000 gallons of wastewater effluent, the total monthly bill an current rates is $581.65 versus $693.00 , on the proposed rates, resulting in an increase of $111.35 or 19.1496. VIII. IMPACT OF RATE INCREASE ON PRETREATMENT CUSTOMERS Exhibit Iv, Table 6 compares a pretreatment customer at current rates versus proposed rates. For a monthly r! discharge of 750,000 gallons of effluent, the total bill on current rates is $1,928.25 versus $2,221.00 for the proposed rates, resulting in an increase of $292.75 or 15.18%. This percentage increase represents only an average increase for all customers in the class. The surcharge calculation included in the actual rate ordinance was revised to reflect only that excess level of BOD and TSS that is above the basic BOD/TSS loading factor for a particular rate class. IX. COMPARISON OF RATES WITH OTHER CITIES Exhibit V provides a comparison of wastewater rates of the City of Denton with Lewisville, Arlington, Garland, Carrollton, an Greenville at current rates. These cities are currently reviewing projected rate increases and their new rates are subject to change by October, 1, 1992. -5- / T 1 REVENUE REQ"REWNTS i REVENUE REQUIREMENTS 1 i i T REVENUE REQUIREMENTS I. SOURCES Revenue requirements were determined by using data f.ror, fiscal year 1993 Operating Budget, 1993-1991 capital Improvements Plan, and associated proforma documents, as revised; the 1992 Utilities Forecast; revised department fiscal year 1992 revenue and expense estimates; and utility financial data from the Finance Department. II. METHODOLOGY Revenue requirements were developed primarily by using the most current utility department documents. However, data on capitalized assets, outside departmental service, plant in service, depreciation, and debt service were obtained from the Finance Department. Some plant in service and depreciation data was revised based on the most current utility department estimates. This data was used to compute the water department return on investment and to develop charges specific to wholesale customers. Because the revenue and expense estimates continue to evolve over time, some adjustments must be made to the existing forecast and budget data. In addition, some rate increases must be phased in over a two or three year period. This may require a reduction in expenditures for the budget year. These adjustments have been made to the extent possible as of the date of this document. { I -6- 7 III. USE OF UTILITY BASIS FOR WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS Wholesale customers revenue requirements are based on a utility versus cash basis. A primary difference is that a rate of return and depreciation expense is charged under the utility basis. Methodology changed in some areas for this rate study. All raw water was charged at the Dallas wholesale rate ($.4862/1,000 gallons) ; all. contributed capital was removed for calculation of return on investment; federal contributed C capital was removed for calculation of depreciation (no federal contributed capital exists in water utility) ; payment in lieu of taxes was removed; capital work in progress (CWIe) interest was chai.ged (not applicable for water in 1993); and a return on capitalized working capital (calculated at 12.5W of O&M) was charged. t An illustration of the difference between the +ttility and cash methodology is provided in Exhibit IIA of the Cost of Service I section of the study. EXHIBIT I REVENUE REQUIREMENTS f F CITY OF DENTON DEVELOPMENT OF WASTEWATER UTILITY Description REVENUE TARGETS Residenilal Commercial Pretreatment Commercial Comore irc aJ Govemm the a~ M-- etwed Sewer Eating places Equip. Svcs, rndustd~ Whdesale'-'- Water Total FY 1993 Expenses _ $2764,303 $3,332,124 FY 1993 Revenues $211,511 :+54,669 $133572 l @4 Current Rates 578416 ~07L38 1871083 $128428 $281'856 $6,906,463 .8 497 108396 1 115~099 265 4f 61 32 FY 1993 Net Gairy(Loss) ($185,887) ($274,748) ($24,428) FY ($6,172) ($2517 6) ($13,3-99) $38,409 ($491,331) 1993 Proposed Percent increase 14'814'° 16.609h 18,75% 18,34% FY 1993 Revenues 15,68% 15,62$° -12,43% 14.00% 0 Proposed Rates 96034 534 35 22216! M391 ! 25 398 133 083 280 453 7 3! 3 262 FY 1993 Net Galry(Loss) $196,039 $202,311 $10,650 $2,722 ($8,174) $4,655 ($1404) $406,799 i P1L 7 COST OF SERVICE I COST OF SERVICE I. SOURCES The sources of data for the development of the cost of service model were the revenue requirements model, the revised fiscal year 1993 budget, fiscal year 1993.1997 Capital Improvements Plan, the 1992 Utilities Forecast, Finance Department, and other water and wastewater utility planning documents, II. METHODOLOGY A. INTRODUCTION The following customer classes were used in the development of the Cost of Service Study; 1. Residential 2, Regular Commercial 3, Pre-Treatment (Commercial) 4. Industry (Commercial) 5. Eating Places (Commercial) 6, Equipment Services (Commercial) 7. Government B. Industrial Water 9. Metered Sewer 10. Wholesale The Commercial Pretreatment, Commercial Industry, and Metered Sewer customer classes were combined with the Regular Commercial class in the cost of service. Also, the two wholesale customers, Corinth and UTRWD (Argyle), were combined into one rate class. I -9- I B. DESCRIPTION OF COST OF SERVICE MODEL This cost model uses an allocation process based primarily on the relative strength of wastewater treated to determine costs associated with each customer class. The first step is to allocate costs to three functional components: volume costs, e~fluent treatment costs, and customer costs. 1. Volume Costs are defined as those costs that occur principally related to total annual quantity of wastewater treated. 2. Treatment Costs are further divided into biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total suspended solids (TSS) costa. 3. Customer Costs are divided into billing and administrative costs. The next step is to allocate function component costs to each customer class. volume costs are allocated according to the annual wastewater usage of each customer class. Wastewater treatment costs are 80D and TSS costs allocated to each customer class in relation to their pollutant load factor. Customer costs a,'re allocated to each customer class according to the total number of annual billings. C. DESCRIPTION OF SECTIONS The Cost of Service Study was divided into 11 SecticrlS which are briefly described below. -10- f , l L. Section li summary of Revenue and Cost Allocations (Cost S1) This section sunmlar.izes the allocation of revenue and costs between three cost factors: vol.ume,biochemical oxygen demand (POD) and total suspended solids (TSS), and customer costs. This summary essentially outlines the total cost of operation and the revenue required to cover those costs. Total revenue includes additional revenue r to be collected through a rate increase. Information is divided between sources and uses of working capital and reflects the rate increase required, 2. Section 2: Allocation of Departmental Expenditures (Cost S4a) This section allocates fiscal year. 1993 operational budget expenditures to the three cost allocation factors. All expenditures are detailed by major budgct categories within each of the five wastewater divisions. Percentage allocations to customer, volume, BOD, and TSS components vary based upon the tasks performed by a particular division, The allocation basis was volume or time and effect. 3. Section 3r Allocation of New Additions to Plant (Costs S5a) This section allocates new fixed assets during fiscal year 1993. Items are shown by specific asset categories and allocated to the three cost allocation factors within each division. For fiscal year 1993, all plant additions were allocated to the volume factor. -tl- wpm J ~ PL 7 4. Sections 4, 61 and 7s Gross Book Value, Depreciation Expense, Accumulated Depreciation, and Net Book Value - Plant In Service (Cost SSb, SSc, SSd, and S53) The sections allocate plant in Service for each division to the three cost categories. The plant in service data was obtained from the Finance Department for fiscal year r 1991. Projections for fiscal years 1.992 and 1993 were " based on the most current operating budgets as adjusted by department estimates, 5. Section 81 Return on Investment (ROY) to General Fund (Cost S5f) This section calculates total return on investment (ROI) due General Government, ROT payments for fiscal year 1993 are based on asset values at the end of fiscal year 1991 and this calculation was used for the study. 6. Section 9s Wholesale Customer Allocations (Cost S5g) This section calculates the allocation of plant in service costs to wholesale customers, it is considered appropriate to allocate costs on the utility versus cash basis. An illustration of the difference between the two methods is provided in Exhibit IIn. The costs for wholesale customers using the utility basis include return on investment, payment in lieu of taxes, and plant and collection system depreciation. 7. Section 10s Distribution of Units of Service To Customer Classes (Distribution S3a, M) -12- This section summarizes the annual billings, forecasted wastewater volume usage and BOD/TSS treatment requirements by customer class. BOD and TSS component load factors are also described. Based on these Calculations, percentage allocations are determined to distribute customer, volume, and DOD/TSS costs to specific customer classes, i 8. Section 113 Distribution of Costs ^ Classes (Distribution S4 TO Customer S4a, Sob, S4a, S9d A. Total Costs (Dist S4) This schedule summarizes the j distribution of total customer costs to each customer class, volume, 130D, and TSS into retail and wholesale costs, are subdivided and wholesale costs only, eL~'.i1 costs only, f 8. Customer Costs (Dist S4a) This schedule summarizes the distribution of customer costs based on the number of bills except that wholesale customer costs reflect additional administrative demands, C. Volume Costs (Dist Sob) This schedule summarizes the distribution of costs to customer classes based on annual wastewater usage, D. AOD and TSS Costs (Dist 84a and Sod) This schedule summarizes costs allocated to each customer class based on the effluent quality factor. •-13- 11 ~y 7 This section summarizes the annual billings, forecasted wastewater volume usage, and BOD/TSS treatment requirements by customer class. BOD and TSS component load factors are also described. Based on these calculations, percentage allocations are determined to distribute customer, volume, and DOD/TSS costs to specific customer classes. 8. Section 11: Distribution of Costs To Customer Classes (Distribution S4, S4a, S4b, S4e, S4d j A. Total Costs (Dist S4) This schedule summarizes the distribution of total customer, volume, BOD, and TSS costs to each customer class. Allocations are subdivided into retail and wholesale costs, retail costs only, and wholesale costs only, B. Customer Costs (Dist S4a) This schedule summarizes the distribution of customer costs based on the number of bills except that wholesale customer costs reflect additional administrative demands, C. Volume Costs (Dist S4b) This schedule summarizes the distribution of costs to customer classes based on annual wastewater usage, D. BOD and TSS Costs (Dist S4a and S4d) This schedule summarizes costs allocated to each customer class based on the effluent quality factor, -13- a EXHIBIT II COST OF SERVICE PAGE SECTION 1. SUMMARY OF REVENUE AND 14 COST ALLOCATIONS (COST S1) SECTION 2. ALLOCATION OF DEPARTMENTAL 15-17 EXPENDITURES (COST S4a) SECTION 3. ALLOCATION OF NEW ADDITIONS 18-19 TO PLANT (COST S5a) SECTION 4, GROSS BOOK VALUE, 20-27 59617 DEPRECIATION EXPENSE, ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND NET BOOK VALUE - PLANT IN SERVICE (COST SMb S5c, S5d, S5e) SECTION 8. RETURN ON INVESTMENT 28 (ROI) TO GENERAL FUND (COST S5I) L EXHIBIT II COST OF SERVICE (rONTINUED) r PAGE SECTION 9. WHOLESALE CUSTOMER 29-32 ALLOCATIONS (COST S59) SECTION 10. DISTRIBUTION OF UNITS 33-34 OF SERVICE TO CUSTOMER CLASSES (DISTRIBUTION 83a & Sib) SECTION 11. DISTRIBUTION OF COSTS 35-39 TO CUSTOMER CLASSES (DISTRIBUTION S4, S4a, Sob, S4c, Sod) I , SECTION I SUMMARY OF REVENUE AND COST ALLOCATIONS (COST Sl) crow-sl DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES i Ree16.aWB3 FIMI COS'C OF SERVICE STUDY Witiiw ALLOCATIONS TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS WASTBWATVR SYST1W DOLLAR ALLOCATIONS _ Cunom~ voL,M O U A L_I f Y _-------1 o,,. ALLOCATION PEFICENTAOEB _ c0,16 BID rBe n1o<fu00 11 Co,U Bub gy„+,m Cufbm■ VoVmf TB.O. D. feea-a-I~-~ lW _1-1u -..la - SOUR- OP ORICI 0CAOTAL; - - + Wastewater Treatment $0,430T.743_ _ RENUE RATE GRANDE 4768ubloiol 1e 90 ,310,797 _926,283 5% _ 002.6% _ - I B.C.11om,r cab $7,000 20,000 c=vwm• _ - c=vw0,f 28, 00 2,000 e AW in Ccnsiruclbn-_ 2,1100 -100.0% c1•vokm, e __MMcellaneous lncom_:~ 93,000 _ - _ _ -.-.Y.-- ct•voLm•__.^-- r InlwSwt - OPerauone 93000 100.011, _ _ 100.0% e 1130-0g e - 8ubtolel _ 1130,1100 100.0% Tow {7~039,S66a_Oy 1A.7% 13.1% 1830,836 ~4. ~~3~540 11,036.797 - ;826203} ~,wa4w w USE8OFW0 -cAPiTA.L.: s.+en 444% 10000% _ s en ee_zaA. r ratb s intance: ,445 6.2% 68.9% 10.3% 8% ;111,428 11,286,909 n 77740 of.colt-af i Personal eavlce . 2.0% 17.6% 17 6,709 1_4- 8,283 F+x eu Yea 0.3% 272 8398 60,4 70 68,478 a" colt-a. ,70.% 16.16.0% 392 890 38,719 35,760 eN ca N 11s Purchased Powel 3~ .9% 01.2% 7.e% 7.4% to 663 r4 Malntenan_ce 493.999 3 - B.9% 13,062 434,063 48,132 48.600 s«cod-+a --641,616 -2.4%_ 80.1% 0.9% __±34 . 6118 627 eNCOet-af--- 1s Ssrvlcas _ - 0.8% 93,6% 3.0% 2.8% 121 17,631 - le insurance i 8undl 18,730 _ 36,212 - Aq_otnl r: n.lb..f _ 36 212 100.0% A~cu,romw cm's V Bad Oabl E_x tgsa 401 882 +e Administrative, nn~fen X81.902 - 00,0% 16,23D i 1,778 2,068 eN colt-eso is Wholesale ROI _ 19,972 78.3% OA% 14,6% 6 - - 0,492 1942 - 1,870 Cx•Wroi«awvo+,rn za Wtwtsaale-_ Bb'ee1 Rental F 12811 -3.9% 81.3% 14.6% J- B«ced•e0o 10,2?2 --I n Wholrsla CWIP 10222 100.0% InMrael - 905,189 __e7,72 ~744,90b ee«c•t+-est_ `Jj j Fund Rof 837,920 _72•gxf 17.3% _ 10,82 _ 30,795) (4,736 x,248 os.ft n Ciaetere 62Ap4 u - S-- s,t~e,ete obet of ROl b Whobs sublotM ;6140,609 12.3% 85.3% 12.9% 13.9% 2830,734 $3,iS4316 1063,189 7002 pe 6 C t e a a 98.0% 26.0% 16.0% - 894 286 372,812 223,b97 ct•RNUi vos,nf _ n ForFisv.0ab111A8Fund 1,490,447 - ci-R.taiva,. ••tfll Vohm• 00.0% 25.0% 16.0% 237L900 - a1 R 100.0% - FWe ieclatbn 237900 5,364 -626 _ 1.039 ON coll_eso xr FWedAaalslOep_ 7,017 _ 76^3% 8.9% 14.8% - - aI.R,lmyolm. xe Whoirata 170 realatlon Ex - 100.0% - ct.Rftulvol,n. _ s xs utility Basis 150,000 160 000 100.0% 1224,800 +,ees.xea z Repayment to 11180100 68.3% 19.8% _ 11.9% 87,622 _ -1373,237 s1 subtotal 11,005,394 _ Ap of A 3A% 09.3% 56 2% 14 9% _ Aw,.FAr Ria sa NET CHANGES IN WIG 101 _ 1 7f,1~ 381 - WHOLE NET CHANGES IN W! 12,682 % 80.3% 16 2% - t4 0% r 30 013WERREVENUE RF.Ol11REMEr1900,4-657:i .1% _16.0%!1.3.4% _~=630i836~ 14,313,6485,038,797 926293 eoOenN %40% R,Y,rLf mQNlf HfdM-a y d 1 I SECTION ON OF 1).F ME AE AL~,OCATExPENDITMES (COST S4a) `fVa7i1". 1 SECTION 2 ALLOCATION OF DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES (COST S4a) i I awisez.wns ikrl DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES xl &a-a COST OF SERVICES STIJDY oosr-sa ALLOCATIONS TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS \ WASMWATER SYS77LV DHPAR7MNNTAL BXITNOMR11S D0LLARS i~ n•wr/ P E R C E N T A G E S O E S S IR 1 VOI ()LIAilTY nrMwn IN 1+9 i0 Iq Coate J canna - eao IM Si r9 Ce OO WA578WATHR AllMI HI STRATIOH 6% 13.0% $8,8ai $127,871 _:24,880 :23,741 -,741 o=nw-tErcv-l 71182,975 3.7% Wo ~ x 5,300 3.7% 6% 13.0% 3,70 rjFdA vicea 4 716 888 a=TmaEnvl ar 3,7SL % 13.0% 4 q_- - {38,100 3.7% 6% 13.0% 1,318 26,228 4,888 4,8BA o.Tm.lErtal 6 579,t00 3.7X % 13.0% 2,089 66,279 0,869 10,283 a•rM•IEnvl e $188 c__- $2,100 3.7% % 13.0% 77 _ 1,488 283 272 o.iMUEnot - - e $3,000 _3,000 _ _ c-Nohow s Total $308,771 _3.8% 70.2X 13.3% 12.8%- 511,182 _$218,748 _ $41,21 t1 =38619 ----00a.nx WATHH1 RHCLAMAIIO - 70• _ l0 Personal Ssvtcsa _ - 5648,609 3,0% 6S.0X 21.0% --21.0%- D55 $477,680 $182,387 $182,387 q.TmaErcvt _ i1 Supplies _ $124,-865 3.0% 66,0% 21.0% 21.0% 3,747 66,887 20,220 28,228 a-yknoanat w+ lx Purchased Power $389,861 _ 70.0% 16.0% _ 15.0% 272.690 68,478 _ 66,476_ o= _ rmaEnal le Maintenance - $319,801 v6.0% 80.0% 7.6% 7.6% 16,980 265,841 23,9115 23,885 o.rm•lenvl -.--T u Servkn _ $261,263 2,5% 87,6% 5.0% 6.0% _6,7.82 2.19,855 12,663 12,663 a=rm•1Ena1 is Insurance $11,268 - 100.0% .r11,268 1e Sundry v _Fbrad Assets _ a=nn•rErcvl 5120,000 100.0% - 128,000 o.Tm•1Env1 Is Total $2,093,b87 88.6% 14.5% 14.6% 562,074 1,434,217 $303,839 ;3031639 -WASTH-W-61 3 R-00-1.1- HC770N 471; w Personal Services $474,406 10.0% 90.0% Y -+=47,480 $427,378 - c-vwm• xo 9upplka~ $62,847 10(1.6% _ 62,8A7 oevolum• m Purchased Power 100.0% - aYeR ew a Maintenance 5101,216 50010% - - 101,216 C=VMM m Servkas $133,050 _ 100.0% - 133,650 .v - 24 Insurance $3,796 100.0% c - - xs Sundry $600 100.0% - - 3,798 600 _ o.vwm. 2s Fbtod Assats _ $33,900 100.0% _ 33,800 n Total 6600,775 _ 1 94.1% - .547,486 T $763,288 - 000.r74 1 1 F8V169QWx3 Fx,.i DENTON MUNICIPAL UTIUTIES COST OF SERVICE STUDY ALLOCATIONS TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONENIS WAS77iWATHR Sy,72W DBPARTNENTAL 6XP1INDI1-URRS L e4ww PER_CENTA=-1 D O 1. L A B S 9yn4m 1N H' R VOL COSre COBTB ATRWATR1t RNOfNRIN0 - 47;1 =-~dZ-i s~ 77 as o 2e Personal $ervicas $312,146 b,0% 60.0% 26.0% 20.0% 26 Supplies _ (16,607 f168,073~~ _ _-$10,250 5.0% 60__0% _26,0% 20.0% (78'838 _(82,429 _c =rmuEnot 36 Purchased Power r 1O% __~~613 6,126 ` - 2,583 - ----2.060 O°imNEnvt _ 3$ Maintenance u _$16,458 6.0% 60.0% _ 26.0% 20.0% °vwm. Services $23,312 5.0% 60.0% 25.0% 20.0% 773 _ 71725 _ -3.863 - 3+ insurance 1-,188 - 11,868 6.828 3,090 c-vou" $360 5.0% 60.0% 25.0% 20.0X 4,862 o°vokq 34 Sundry 18 180 x F4sd Assets ^ _ 100.0% --72 c.vw.,,.y $28,000 100.0% Told $397,618 4.7% 63.4% 23.3% 16,7% 26,000 - y $16,U77 - (208,769 a-v0~nw WA5TAWATHR - -f 90'380 $72,303 er Personal Servlnea $164,466 5.0% 26.0% 36.0_% 35.0% W - $38-,816 $7.723 se supplies _ - --$16,410 610% 26.0% 36.0% 36.0% j64~063 $64,063 a-rmlJExo1 • Web Purchased Power 771 _ 3,663 - 6,394 ,394 a°imNExnt 6.0% 26.0% __36.0% - 36.0% 6 q+40 Maintenance _ 25.0% 36,0% _3 $8,245 5.0% 81 n-rmuFnot 5.0 41 ICM 412 2,0 (41,420 5.0% A25.0% 35.0% 36,0% - 071 2,888 _ 2,988 o.rmNenat 4e (assurance - 2,071 10,365 14.497 _ (524 _ 610% 25.0% 36,0% 35.0% _ 14,497 a_tmycx~_.i 44 Sundry _ 26 131 193 - S.tr% 25.0% 35.0% 36.0% 18J o-rrn.rEnc1 44 Fixed Assets $20,000 00.0% 20.0% 20.0% 0-TrnNFna1 44 Total $240,086 4.0% 27.9% 33.6% 33.8% - 12,000 - 4,000 ° 4 000 csvo6mr - =11.003 $87,018 $61,023 $81,023 - x4o,as AS'IWATRR ppR77tRATMRNT-48' 4s Personal S ces $}67,486 6.0% 26,0% 36.0% 41 Supplies - - $7,674 $39,371 - (65,120 $9,6'/0 5.0% 26.0% 36.0% 36,0% ° $65,120 o.rmNreQi 44 Purchased Power 6.0% 26.0% 36,0% 464 36.0% - --2,419 3.366 3,386 O=T1nNEria1 4s Maintenance $3,165 6.0% - 26.0% 36.0% 169 _ o^im.7Fnat -.urance 6.0% 26.0% 35.0% 36.0% 798 y 664 f,115 _I15 o.Tm•rFnat m Insurance 6.0% _ 26.0% 36.0% _ 36.0_% - 3,260 4,576 4,676 a°rmuE'nat - W Sundry 5,41 _ 25.0% ^ 36.0% 36,8% b F9ted Aesats _ $27,000 -68.014 20.0% _20.0% - a°rmNFxat 64 Total f210,41r 4.4% 29.6% 33.1% 33,1% 16,200 6,400 -_6,400 c.vbku $9,171 ~02,053 _ - (89_695 -_____sea, beb 210,414 r \r 1 I 11961562,WK3 Fhl DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES aosr-au 21 -9"-W COST OF SERVICE STUDY ALLOCATIONS TO FUNCTIONAL. COMPONENTS WAS773WATHR "SlaW DUPA97WRNTAL RXPl1NDl771RhW _ pO LLAR S e... PERCEN7AOES 115 VOL ('TOWER QUALITY amm IN I~ 14 Iq costa coats eo`o ios TOTAW Be Paramid Services $2.00,446 6,2% 17.8% =111,428 $1,266,969 $304,286 $377,740 re Supplies $216,302 _ 2.6% 82.6% 17.5% 17.3% _ 6,709 136,634 36,283 37,743 67 Purchased Power $369,861 70.0% 16.0% 15.0% 272,896 66,478 66,476 i se Malntananae _ $403,998 3,9% 81.2% 7.8% 7.4%--_ 10,Bb3 _ 892,686_ 38,718_ 35,780 so Sam keg $641,815 ~2.4% 60.1% _ 8.9% 6,8% 13,082 _ _434,063 48,132 46,680 s3 Insurance _ $18,136 h.J% 06.4% 771 -`1.6_% 44 16,683 273 _ 265 or Sundry $2,000 3.0% _76.7% ^10.9% 10.5% 77 1,986 283 272 62 Fled Assa4s $237,900 - 92.1% 4.0% 4.0% 219,100 9,400 9,400 a Total _ $4,041,106 61.6% 14.6% 14.0% _ $146973 $2,740,079 _ $686,663 :586,200 ~a 1,n3 w~ I H V i SECTION 3 ALLOCATION OF NEW ADDITIONS TO PLANT (COST S5a) I DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COST-ea. am+ewwa rw1 COST OF SERVICE STUDY wwM,Me , la-Sop-w ALLOCATIONS TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONENT, WAMWATHR SYSHW - l ADD177ONS 7b PIA NT P E R C E NT A a E S t,-cT OMER Vol. _ Quil-fry eyl,n tN tat _ (q Iq T1Soo Tee 1~L~1=L~-._LcL.::, ---lr°- ewu set M A btrelb -46 - - - ti 2,000 1 6uMd1n a E u meet 2,000 ~f-~3 2 Furnhura TA Fbft(" 1,000 1000% ,0 00 a OtBce E u msnt a 500.0% e Non 0 t Flied Asaels 100.aubtotd 0% .-13000 _a. ooo T - ale ec wne o 70' - - e Building & Equipment _80.0% _ 16.0% 26.0% Notin o1 PWI - 01 OWY o Furntiure a FlcWres _ 006 o-vauMP - 10 0tflos Equl~mant 12,000 -100.0% 1 2 30 30,000 - c-VMUME f1 Machll;ry a Equipment 30000 - 100.0% c-vaVME 12 Radio E,-Qu~nt _ 10,000 100.0% ---10,000 c-votuME 1a Miegllaneoua EqulPrnlrnt 80.0% 16.0% 25.0% 1749bn of Plant-21BwY_- 1 14 Sewer Plant - - - c-YOLUME u 100.0% _ - ^ qip. oo'0% - c-vauuE rle _ Raw Water Station E le BtOfape DapotalBb ueWras C.VOLUME fy ReserVOlra t Bt. Pipes 100.0% _ - 100 - c-YCIUME fe Turbo Genmatin Units - c-VOLUME 1o LM Stations 22.000 -100.0% _ 22,000 - rt ao _ PudBcatitxl System _ - 80.0% 16.0% 26.0% Do.bn of P1.ni - 91 euay i o0.0% c-VOLUME xf Hewer Means 6 Colleclors n Blruc Wree A Improvement : 86 000 _ eo.a 6 0 1.7 r 360 - 18 260 c.vauME r'.0 0 yr aubtotd 3 000 81.3 7.0 ~L 113000 D 60 --8a260 °9.000 astewabr Co m don - 471' - - C.VOLUME 100.0% 24 6u0clinp • Equipment _ - - _ c-vMUME 26 Furnhure 6 Fbdures~ - 100.0% _ 100.0% C-YCLUME--__ 24 Olreat 6 Bridge - " ' - cOMME n -Machinery 6 Equipment _ 100.0% C.YCLUME _ 110010% 160.0% C-VCW ME 20 MleCataan00 EgulPmenl _ 4801Y10 _ 100.0% 480,000 c-yM 1 y w Sewer Maine VM VM -E al Manlwlee 100.0% C C-VMUME _ - _I00.0% 841,000 w ^Intarce tors-- 841,-000 E Q _ Nvdrante 100.0% c.v - - 28,000 IOOyOX C.vc%UME ar 8ervlces - - - - 100.0% C VOUME as Lit 8btion6 _ C VOLUME yl p111er Fbred Asaeb jW,000 100 0 - - _.-~~~~0 1 uo,ooo subtotal 37 R9a 160Q.1yy(~ Fklrl oeNro COST OF SFRy CE STUDY ALLOCATIONS TO FUNCTIONAL COMPOMENTs ~sr-ss. WAST BWATBR SYS] W ADD1770NS M PLANT ei"• PER C aM, E N r A 0 S icae-ya (EQ rq- -q ('I15TOMIik Vol. Q'r~ I VUAIITY aetewafe tes costa coats Er racrln Poem. BO0 - 472: -..aoo i~ 'r FurnFtura; F--;_ ,~i~__ j erenuon rot '°_aflceEqulprnenf 00 100,G% _ - sNr~ Aadio 20,ooo ~,ment 100.0% ~r Allsceltaneoua - 100.0% ~0 - - - - 43 u~' E ui mant6000 20,000 - - a_.`va.urws` -100.0% Sarvicea w -tOD.tl% - o.V_CLUMJ aubfofnl 6000 28 ;C'oI -C _Vot"i Walla to - _00.0 _ T- _ - - ~yauMe`_------- bo RIO - 81: =~.-.L- 28000 Ca .yau FurnHura 4 Ftxluraa Bu9 ~ue 40 OM~.~e MMachinea~_ _ _ 100.0 47 i E 9,000 - - dln u _ rnant- 1-0-0--P% % x.0oo 4YUrea 100.0% ti T , - 1000 c•vauyE u OfHoe Machlnas 100. 0% - _ ANacNlartso j0~ Ur F r mu ant - 100.0% ^ - 21. a 00 c.vouME - 61 42000 C.VIXUYE Furnifuro 8 Fi><turn t - 483: ■Ubtotd ~t13 000 - 6ax _ 26.0 e.VauarE - W to afar 7 eat do,?- L 18.7 L 18.7 - - -?d 000 c.vauwE 53 e 10 600 ~ - ID 600 10,600 cwa_ u-ME rtea 2000 afra. Machr io 600 - _ Buli n 1 1,000 T 10°.00% _ ea.oao D6 Mracalranoou - f0o'.o0% - - ae ~ I manf 10.ptl0 10000% 1000 La 11000 60. 26 - Ca VCtUME 3 . C _ .VUIUY_E ar BaWM slam - 64.66 22.73 =¢000,4_. 6 - 000 _2.660 c.vauwE 00.0% C==[: Total 2600 ~ 471 000 1.6 2.0 1 419 000 22 760 29 260 1,0 1.000 I it I I r .~+T~-- 1 n101412,WX8 Faai DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES roar-ss. w.n.r. COST OF SERVICE STUDY ALLOCATIONS TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS WASTEWATER SYSTEM \ AAU1 TTONS TO PLANT __nT_S-- s.w. PERCENTAGES CUSTOM Hit VQ[. _pUA[]TY ay.t.n IN lW (q IA cuere GOS75 aoC vtq Abc•tlon 1092-w CUIL voum. eoo reo _-19 aui. f Wastewater ten 1 ewln - 472' x FurnMure d FtaWrw 1,000 100.0% _ 1,000 - c.vauME w Oflfoe Equlp msnl 20,000 _ 100.0% 20,000 c.v OLUME I 40 Fladio E u ment 100.0% C,yauME 41 acallaneous E ul ment 6_,090 100.0% - _ 6.000 c.vauME 42 Meters 100,0% c,vaUME _ u 8ervicas J _ I90i0% 0-VOLUME C-2e 009 C=T 100,0 c _JC .326 ubtew 44 Wastewater Labo alor - 491: 45 FurnMure d Fbrtures 100.0% 0,-MUME 4e 01fbe Machlnas 1,000 --100.0% 1,000 C,vo1.uke 47 l1UYdInO d EqulPment 20,000 _ 10.0% 29,000 C•VUIUME 4e FurnMure 4 Fbctufea 100.0% _ - _ c,vauME 14o Of11C0 Machines 100_0% - _ ~ cc^voLUME ~so _ Miacellrnaew EqulPment 2000 60.0 _25.0% 26.0 21.000_.--,1,00 _ 0600 _c•vowME I s, subtotal -69 000 ae.7% 16.7% 10. 42 000 $10.500f 10 600 - MAW Was a real - ia3: sz Furniture d FbrWroa 100.00% - c•voLUME~~_._.. I'x 52 OMoo tAachlnr 1,000 100.00% 1,000 o-vaure 64 BuMd1n 6 E u mant 100,00% o-vauME _ Eb Mlecellaneous Equipment 9000 60.0 26.0 -2 .0 -_6.000 2.600 2600 C•YUL MME 6e - 11 000 64.661E 2 7-3-%- F 22.7a 0.00 a 2.600 2 600 15,000 Lan i 1a' - I sr Sewef8Ystom ~_-~~1 100' c•vowME ys Tolnl 471 000 90.6% 1.6% 2.0%11 1 $1,410,000 *22.750 29 260 1,4714000 9 SECTION 4,5,69 & 7 GROSS BOOK VALUE, DEPRECIATION CIATION, AND ACCUMULATED DEPRE NET BOOK VALUE PLANT IN SERVICE (COST S5b, S5c, S5d, AND S5e) I RM15p,WK4 yr•i DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES wrrw.w COS'C Oi? SERVICE STUDY coat-ese ALLOCATIONS TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS WAS'7HWATHR sysmu ORO&N 8[X38 VALtfH i eJw• P[ n C E N T A G_E S 1 STOMHR VOL - pUAIlTY ey"" 1N lkq Iq Iq COKE Coate Abn+kn le -b WrL VoAan a'l0 roe IN p00- T ___f_I7~- Bull WRetewater Ad Inlstration- 1 Bug dine L E u Rwnt $2,000 100,0% $2 000 2 Furniture 3 Pbctures - _ -R-.VOLUME $6,898 100.0% 6,e9e _ c.vauME a Ofllce Equipment $12,607 -100.0% - - 12,697 _ CayULU ME $tore EgUlpmsnt-_ 100.0% - I a Radlo E u ment C.vq,U ME 4 _ 1000% cwauwE a Non OeEt Fb+ed Assets f ~ 0 _ 283 c.vauME 7 sublotNL-(202831`_._..00....0%L IF - 1. xo tea Wa or Rea ar lotto - 470: e BuNdin 8E U man: $10,994,698 80,0% 16.0% 25.0% Furniture t Fbrhrrer $17348 100.0% (9,638_,813 :1,834,203 f ~onyn a owv 10 Office Equipment O.VIYUME $N,134 100.044,134 C.VOLUME Machinery 8 Equipment 65 614 +x _ Radlo Equipment i- c.vauME $139,48100,0% 139,406 c°vauME Is Wecelloneous E I ment $61,316 100.0% 64,318 c-VVCIUME Ito Sewer Plant _ $1 268,461 80.0% 15.0% 25.0% _765,070 1wrbnm C+s Raw Waler 86atlon E u 100.0% C.vO -L I u etas a blBtructuras y - 100.0% C.VOLUME IV Reservoirs St Pipes 100.0% c.vauME1e Turbo Senerstln Units 100.0% - [.VOLUME u L1ft SkIons 133,423 100.0% wauME 20 PurMcation 6yslem $1,665t62 1610% 25.0% __833,233,273 rbn of PIn1xtew2t Sewer Mains d Co6actors 36e986 .0% 1,3ea,908 Slruobires 11 Improvement $86,0 0.0 260 39 000 c•YOLUME 76D .vOLUME 23 0-! 3 221.I $10199 DAIT--. 1s,xa,asa asl Collection 24 BuMdlne IA E j!p u men, S4e 100.0% _ -49 - C.YOLUNE - xs Purnh4re 6 Fbrt res 789 too.o% Y - 7108 xe Street 6 Bridge - C-VOLUME $13 309 13,306 _ n Machiner~8, Equipment $667 gs 100,0% c.vauME 97,07b - c.VOLUME ze Radlo Equipment $44,197 - 100.0% 44,197 C. zo AMscallanoou VOLUME 0 Egul~ment $f80,718 -1DO.0% - 190,716 c.vauME Jo Sewer Maine $19 7921070 _ 100_0% - 19,782,470 31 Manholes - - - c_VauME _ $94,286 Y 100.0% 94,288 c.vauME Jx IMetaPlon _ $2.322,692 100.0% 2`322,682 as H drsnN c-VOLUME $2,316 -1000% 2,316 - Jr ewvlces - - - - c°vquME $803,252 100.0% 003 _ 262 CWq.UME ss LNtBta6ons --263,794 100.0% JJ ahe~ Faed Aesata 203,704 C.VOLUME -.-$56.e8~ 100 D_91 _ 105 8~8 c.YnLUME subtotal 6_t0,4E1 C, 11uo.opt_C-r - ~1[- TL ,sID 452]- T =,91052 1 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTIUTIES G087-d" R991e92.WKe FW1 Wrbarwr COST OF SERVICE STUDY ' ALLOCATIONS TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS WASTB WA TBk SYSTIW OROSS B(X) ALUB fta)T_,,,, P E N C E N F A Q mHK en_ 1. cjuAlta uss n mit S feon ree W ter n ear r - 72: 100.0% 6409 o-wauwF 36 FurnNura i Fbclur" $6408 30,633 a.Fauwe ae Ot6ca Equip"mm _ $30,633 100.0% c.VaUME Aadb E u moot - _ 100.0% 40 100.0% 19,000- ccvoLUwE n AAscelianeous E i ment $18,000 - - c•vauwE 42 iNtae _ 100.0% -_~--1 - t3arvleea- 00.0----- --1r _-T'~__'.~ 1--=`~ cfvouu Me u.u4r 43 I =00 w tubtoted ~62 W Wstm" Labo acct - 49 - c-vavwt 47 796 -.0% 47,790 4s Furniture i FbcWree 100 12,366 _ c.VoLUME 4e ofpoo Moctllmn =12,369 100.0% - c-vauwE 47 6uNdn9 i Equlpment $162 002 100•0% 162,002 - - 270 c-vauwe --_u 4a _ Furniture i Fbctuea _ 12,270 100.0% 12, _ _ c•vowwE 4o gflfoe Machins 100.0% 1,270 c.vtit.uw¢ 03,455 _ 4 7 ~ - -41.27 ~94zre Aso lAaaellaneous E uq IpmerN _ 9 0 60.0 2 0 .0 8.9 0.9 10.6% 309 784 41 727 $41,727 e! oubtetal 393 219 Wsta eMr T eal t - 483: - 100.00% - - c.vauwE__ J a? FurnNurs i Fbeturw - 1.000 c•vauwE c.VOI.UNE as oMoo Machlnm 000 .00 54 1lu9dai Fqulpment 100.00% - 50.0 26.0 26 0 ~6 000 _-2.600 _^2 600 c.vauwE 4 _ 100 % mart o 00-P - 2 n,aos as _ Wscollanenua Equip 0 ~12711 z? VA 6e - aubtetal I le; ---•-0~ !,247,482 c.vauwE and sr tiewar Sys' em _~~_=?s947A82 100 0% II - $35m342.1531 2 110 221 3 497 660 40,93e.a.14 y Total 40939937 89.3 6.2 8.6% v 1., s i i "1602*93 Firm DENTON MUNICIPAL UTHAIES char-o.w WrMw1Mr COST OF SERVICE STUDY u-aw-sx ALLOCATIONS TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS WAS77JWATBR SYS7ZW QBPRIMIA770H f?XPHNSR iS~Z-C ~R Tf emr PEHCENTAGES CUS['OMRR Vol, UUALTY _ - r r Adminls stbn 00" eg IQ 14 coeTe ccaru Boo Tea nWC•V2n fAl 1ea2-b cu. . VOL" eao 7Ba Lg- - r Bulidin & gulpment $20 ,---100.0% f20 c•vauME 2 Furndurs i Fhdures $$20 100`0% 620 $2,6 1 c•vauuE 1 a OMce Equlpmsnt 4 _ Store Equipment 100.0% - - - - vau_ _ a Radb Equipment 100.0% c. - 4_ MUME ME e Non D t Fbced Assets _ _ 100.0% c•voluME T subtotal r-,,,:A -1--~•• r 3__.067 Water Rec amatlon --470:- Building It Egulpment $217,69 -x130,738 $32,981 $1.4,473 a1e~m Pinl - e1 s•.iy _ i o _ Furniture i Fbctures 6,735 700.0% 1 736 - uME 10 OMce E u merit $7927 100.0% c 11 Machinery i Equipmenl f14,0e1 _ 100.0% c.•volvauME 14,081 c.voluME~~..- 1a Radio Equipment --_-$13,447 100.0% 13,447 ` - c.vauME..._ ,a a Belo plant Equipment $6.432 100.0% 432 c.v_UE _ 11 tiawef Plant f_60 938 80.0% 15.0% 26.0% - 30,203 7,1161 12,695 OLU Pbn1 - al BLdy is now Water Station Equip, 100.01E F-- --06ion ME u story a Islstruclures 100.0% 1r Ressryoire i SL Pipes 100.0% O•VOLUME 1e Turbo Oeneratln Unlb 1000% c•vauuE1s LIM Stetlons 4,e97 100.0% 4,89% c•vcluuE 20 Purl"catlon system 90.0% 16.0% 26,0% O.leeal PMnt - 91 e•.fy 21 - Sewer Malin i Collector $55,479 100.0% _ 66479 c.vawME - 22 _ Structures i I rovement 5 - 80.0 - 6.D i- 26.OZE f--- _ 7~0 - 195 3~6 C.YMUME » subtotal $372.209 C_ ZTf~4; ~10.9iZ6-L .1 I -204397-$40.430 X7393 3rx. xlo Was to Co I tlon 47 24 Building i Equipment $1 100.0% 1 - c.vauME _ 23 Furniture i Fblturg -_.A77 100.0% 77 o. voeuME 2e Street t Bridge -100.0% _ c.vrauE n I:achlnary i Equipment $8,707 -100.0% - - 0,107 c.VOI.uM m Radb Equlpmant $4,419 100.0% 4.419 c.vauME _ m Miscollar*0us Equipment - 100.0% c•voluME ao sewer Mains _ 782499 10(),0% - vo _ 31 Manholes _ :3.,x71 100.0% 782,489 c.VOluHE 171, LUME s2 tnterc~ton $90 D84 _ 100.0% 80,091 c.vuuME m N wises $93 - 100.0% 93 c. VOLUME 3e Lift Statleeons $23,670 t00.0% ~-23.670 c.vauME $19,651 100.0% » Lilt Stations x Other Fixed Agents --_$6 fi97 - OD 0~s 0 661 C.VOLUME cwauwE er auhtatsl~$9j9,339 1 A1816SONK3 Fwi DEWON MUPMCIPAL UTILITIES WnMwrw COST OK SERVICE STUDY cva7-ems +0-%p-a ALLOCATIONS TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS WASTU WATER SYS7HV DEP HQA770N EXPHNS9 amw _ P E R C E N T A G E S cvsn7MBR Q17A1J TY J ayi4'^' 1N-i is - 19 L4B coaTo co a7a l83 43►z-w a.rvar.,,. n cM_ Wants ter E 7ewin - 72: % FurnIture S Fktures S91 !00_0% 601 c-vau ME 30 _ Othco E4ulpmant 4,107 100.0% 4 107 _T- 40 _Aadb Equipment c.v'u 70010% _ +4 Miscellaneous Equipment - 1 360 100.0% C.VOLUME 1,360 c-VOLUME 42 Mat4rs _ 100.0% - _ c-VOLUME 43 - services 0000 q_ - C-VOLUME M subtotal F- 100.oxI'°Z-=~C-- _ e.a3 Wastewater bouio - 491: _ 45 Furnhure i Fktures 4 770 100.0% - - 4.770 c-vauue 48 Ottke Machitle0 ._22371 _ 100.0% 2 13-71_. _ C-V:,JJMf_ 47 Bu6dlna d Egulpfwnt $2,A40 100.0% 2,640 C-VOLUME 40 Furnfture 6 Fktures _ $1,227 100.0% 1,227 - 0-VOLUME _ l 4s - OM1ee Machines $370 100.0% - _ 370 - T_ C-vauME_-_-- Mbcelianeoua Equl ment _ $1460 60,0 260 6,0 _ __206 _ 3.e46 3e a c.vauME 3i oubloW A 16772, I 13.9% -13.9% 18 601 3 819 3 848 26d 62 Wae mler Pre e9 9 t -483: _ 62 Furniture a FbcWrn 100 00% FL e0 Offloa Machine : 100 1000% 26.0 26.0 100 = s< BukdFn9 t E94 u _ Miscous E Equip 1~ ,0 meni 60,0 I 25 eoo s7 Land Rinhts- Total 1 327 438 91.3 3.3% 6,4 $1.212.0821 203 71 16e i,32t4u ~ z4 I Ty 7 aee+efx.wxa re,.i DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES CO97_e~ \ weOMweer COST OF SERVICE STUDY 1e-sw-a2 ALLOCATIONS TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS WA5T73WATER SYS7TW ACCUMUI.ATBO DEPRECTA770 - - - - - a.~. PERCENTAGES _ ~(USTOM i3x IE T _ c~uAt~rl~7--v 9y~lrn IN 1s) (q (q caste Coate L goo-~ I6a Awcaaon 1012-M . I Ycw (N-_--~~ -1c1 9~LIr mlawater Adminiftrat n- 1: CWI YON" (too tge SuNdIOR 4i Egubmenl $20 _ _100.0% - - C-VOLVME z Fmntlure 6 FbOOtrea :871 100. D% 974 c=VOLUME s Office E ul menl $8,201 100.0% - 0,287 c-VOLUME Store Equipment 100.0% - - c•V«UME 1 s Radio E u meet _ 100,0% c•v«uµE _ a Non Dept Fixed Afeetf _ --J 00.0 - _ c-VOLUME 7 subtotal s7.266 100.9 %~fis=-= Water ec! atlnn - 470- - r - e u nt7 6 Equip menl =2,174,681 80.0% 16.0_% 26.0% $1,304,749 :328,187 =543,846 DOtbn o!PIn1 - of obAy ro Furniture . FEaturef =16,704 100.0% 16,704 c-votu - to Offloe E u meet :28,697 100_0X c-v«UME +1 Machinery Fquipment _ $89,137 100.0% BB,137 C-VOLUME +z Radio EqubrrYinl =76,276 100.0% 76,276 c•v«uME - m eu I■nsow Equipment =27,180 10010% - _ 27,190 c-VOLUME A _Sewef - Plant $983,883 _ 80.0% 15.0% 26.0% 678, 3,98 _ 144,684 240,973 aryn or rr.,+ - c+ sway re 4:f.1s _ Raw Water 8latlon Equip 100.0% 10 OfY a 1efBt7UClUree 100.OX C=VOLUME 17 _ Reaarvolrf 8. BL Pipes _100.0% c.v«uMe is Turbo Generating Units 100.0% c-VOLUME - LM Stations 08,2f3 100.0% 8,213 _ c-vauME_ 20 Purification System _ ;656 152 _ 80.0% 16.0% 26,0% _937,091 233,273 388,788 o.ebn o+ Pwucr gwy - - 21 _ Sewer Mains 8 Co Nectars $231.042 100,0% 231,042 c-VOLUME 22 Structures d ITProyement - 300 - 80.0 _ I6.a'g 26.0 - 780 _ _oS_ 326 c.v«uME zs subtotal ~_}6 J~18 _e3 3.8 _ 22.7 --3 288 21 _}70,239~_ 7~ 3 -------s,+m.+aO Wastewater Co ectlo 1 -4 T 25 n0 Equipment 100.0% 2 -i-_ c-VOLUME rs Fu Furniture d FbOWres 323 23 _ 100.0% ---3~- c.1,- ze Street A &Id a 109.0% - «uME zr Machinery 6 Equip-meet W,624 100.0% 26,824 c-VOLUME za Radio Equipment $24r087 -100.0% 24 ,O-B7 - c-VOLUME - m Mifeeila+leoue Equfpmont 0180,718 100.0% _ C-VOLUME 190,718 eo --Bower Maine =9,70.1,791 100_0% 9,703,791 C-VrL.I1ME It Mfinhoief $-04,6-81 100.9% - 81,687 c•v«uME so nterce0tore $440,276 100.0% 148,278 c-VOLUME ae Hydrants $686... 100.0% 085 c-VOLVME 34 .,,:.:..J Services -0162473 _ 100.0% VOLUME Lift Stations 0247,565 100.0% - • 162,473 _ _ c-247 666 _ C-VOLUME as Other Ftaed Aeaeta 0 c-vauur--- sr subtotal L -j 378 633 I i I I i DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES vasr--W a6elb@WK9 rwa COST OF SERVICE STUDY w..l..r. e-9.p ALLOCATIONS TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS WAST[3WAT'8H 5757738( AMIM4111-ATED I M P A B I C 1 A T T 0 ~1f D G91sTUMLltt VOI, _ al7AlSTY e", PE N C E N T A Q E S _ coere T COSTS 9e0 T9e AWcbtlon arTttwn SN !M Iq Iq (pi BUT, saz-a a) vovn eoo Tae satewste E Inoerl - 72: - 1,978 c.vauMeJ- 1,978 100.0% _ t os Furnkure i FbcWres - - 7 684 c=vxuME 7,684 ~s Otbca Equipment c.vauuE eo _Redb Equpment 100.0% 1,000 G-VOt-U ME - u 18lscellaneous £qulpment 1,800 1000%__ - G.vauue ~Metsrs 100.0% - - c-VMUME oo.o u Bervleas - - --L- , M et,bta:TaI1 mil`-T 00.0 Waslawa of Lahore o - 8+' • _ - t6 6 opo ~e Furnkure i F6cWres 090 +~0% "Z'UM7670 ,00.0% 7670 Vj At6ce Machines 12,447 •vowru i +2,447 +00.01 6,608 .vauME.re Furnkure i FlrWres 6Aee 100.0% 94e _VOCUM u ONlce Machlna~ 948 100.0% acellaw E I ant 61 4 f600 _no I 12~.V UME a,t49 61 subtola+ 94148 72 ast aler rst astrne t - 489' aYvot-uAiE - bz Furnkure i F6cWrea 1 ~'0% 100 c VOLUME 100 100.0% - - 50 Wt+ea Ueeh~lnsa - _ 100,0% - _ c. v0 eb Bukdln i EcLu{~mant 7{7yII.. 60-.0 __2b.0 _26.0 --250 - 1 c•v_otuMe E9!r pmenl 600 =-__L --egg too I m Miscellaneous - g, 0.8 w _ Land _uc-vMWE - - er Sower System___--I.~--~ _-..-L-__1L.----- -0X, te.t Rt,tex +4 263246 717221 1 1&1719 1667162 68,2 4.4% Telal be --z - - _ r~ _ - - _ y I RGe16szwx3 Fwi DENTON MUMICIPAL UTILITIES cnsr-ss. wMw..nr COST OF SERVICE STUDY 1e-s.r-o-z ALLOCATIONS TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS WAS77iWATER SYS77W NET BOOK VAIJIE i5' 6 - L [ F T I - 9..r P E n c F N T A Q E S _ Ctis,laMBx VOL O11A119'Y 9yRen IN Ill Ih 101 cCare COOTS 800~'~'1I -199 ASo"%n A92 -03 Cu11. Vormr BOO TSa L (Cl j' Wastewater Administf Rllon - 1: 1~--- aril. 1 BuNdinila Equlp ;1,890 100.0% $1,980 O-VOLUME 2 -Furniture a Flxturee _ -W $4,722 100.0% 4,722 c-VOLUME 6 Office E u merit $8,326 100.0% 8,328 _ 0-VOLUME 4 Store Equipment 100.0% 6 Radio Eguiment 100 .0% _ _ c-VOLUME e Non Dept Fixed Assets 100.0 c-VOLUME subtotal 13 o27C: 00,0 T~~~_---1-- ia,oze a o Reclamation - 70: s Building& Equipment $8,720,107 80.0% 16.0% 26,0% - =6,232,064 $1,309.010 _:2,180,027 0-1enor Pu„[-alao,dy + s Furniture 9 Fbdures $1,942 100.0% 1,942 c_vauMe~--.-._ 16 Office Equipment $t6,437 100.0% 16,437 c-VOLUME u Machinery & Equipment $88,477 100.0% 96,477 c-VOLUME u Radlo E u Mont __04,191 -100.0% 64,191 c-VOLUMe _ 13 Misceiianew" Equipment _ $27,129 100.0% 27,129 C-Va.uME 1 N hewer Plant $294,567 00.0% 16.0% 26.0% 178,734 _44,184 -73_030 Wrbn or Pin[ -s1 eemy__- N 1e Raw Water Station Equip. 100.0% _ c-VOLUME Ie -9torrgs De~otalSbuuluros -100.0% - c-VOLUME II Roservoirs 9 St. Pipes -100_0% Y - - - _ C-VOLUME Is Turbo Generating Units 100.0% c-VOLUME - Is LW Stations __$126,211 _ 100_0% C-VOLUME 20 _ Purification System 60_0% 16.0% . 26.0% o.ron of pwn[ - e1 away _ 2i Sewer Maine 4 Collectors $1,165,924 --_J 100.0%1 1 _C.VOLUM_E___ _ Z?. Structures 8 Improvement mom- mosi 5.0 % X8,220 0 666 __6,g 6 c-VOLUME 23 subtotal L a1v.W7.~71 _ 86.6 . ~.,~2_o}Lr 2~6'~G 55 220969 _--IO.6ai.a14 Wastewater Catfection - 471. N Building & Equipment - $47 106.0% 47 c-VOLUME - 26 - Furniture 6 FbAufes v 447 100.0% 447 C-V/x.UME 24 Street a Widge $13,309 _ 100.0% 13,309 c-VOLUME r Machine & Equipment $61,451 100.011 24 Iladlo Equipment- _ $20,100 100.0% 20,100 - - C-VOLUME 20 ----Miscellaneous Eg[llpmant 100.0% C-VOLUME so bower Maine $10,969,679 100.0% 10,088.679 C-VOLUME v _ 31 - Manholes 699,679 100.0% 9,679 C-VOLUME 32 Interceptors _$1,976,317 100.0% _ 1,978,317 C-VOLUME 33 F11drents -100.0% e< Services $460,779 100.0%`-.- c=Voiu ME as Lift stations $16,219 --100.0%- _ C-VUI.U ME ae _-Other Fixed Assets -1-00.4% 96.365 37 C.vowME.- -1 fl._ 7- -7---7-I ' • 1 - aubtoi el _.>I.12,~gR_ l.l_~ 100 016L___ __.1 __-.__.--J~__ 12.eal,sz2 I n901592AKe FIMI DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES eosr-es. weerw.l. COST OF SERVICE STUDY la-s.p-a~ ALLOCATIONS TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS WAST13WATBR SYS77rer NHT BOOK VA7,OH - - - seww P E fl C F N T A i3 E S LTISTf)MHR VO[. VUAITI-f S)M wn I lW costs coats sco Tes nMeCetlon 1612-10 GVs1IN. V.Mrw sl 91000 T96 ru Want ase En inae n - x Furniture 8k TMures 4,430 100.0% c.voGume % Of foe Equipment 22,949 _ 100.0% 22,949_ COOLUME a Radio Equipment 100.0% c-Muwf 41 Miscellaneous Equipment 14,100 __100.0% yW 14,100 u Melon 100.0% - _ c_votUMe-----_---- ,q services _100.0%, w ---Total 41.4n Waglawater la t o - 011: 46 _ Furniture & Fixture. 31 696 100.0% _ _ 3f 806 v J~211070 c.vowME 4e f)fboa Machine 4,787 100.0% 4,7&7 .vowuE U Building & EUuipnwnt139 666 100.0% 139,666 0-VOLUME a Furniture & Fbdures 0,604 100,0% 6,604 C.VOLUME a Offto Machines 048 100.0% 848 o.vaUME Nag Mlsesllsrleous E f ant 115,461 60 26.0 25.0% 7,741 28 8 0 c•vauME jlm subtotal 289070 _ 60.7% 0. 9.7_%~ T7 11241,3311 26070 28070 za 9,on Wasts"ler etreabn i - 463' s) =Kurs & FbtWtes 100.0% _ - C.YaUME f ea 01Ibe Machines 900 100.0% 900 W c.vauME a+ BuYdln i £ u ment 100.0% - - c-VOLUME a Mlscellsnsow Equl ant 8 600 60.Q i 26 0 4,760 2,376 _ 2 776 c.votuME se subtotal -Tb~Db _ .3 b 3 lo,~oo ar Sewer System >R1,247,482 100.0% 1,247482 T' T I G.YCtUME se Total 24 762 7S6 66.1 6.59.3%11 2) 066 920 t 303 000 2 300 630 z4,raz,ree r - - , "T~ i SECTION S RETURN OF INVESTMENT (ROD TO GENERAL FUND (COST S5f) awrr i I I i t cosy-ax DENTON MUNICIPAL UTIU11ES R0116e2WO COST OF SERVICE STUDY j weew.ewl ALLOCATIONS TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS le-sw-oz 1YAS771 WATHR SYMW CAl,f,V1.A71 ON OP OHNHRAL FU D O --0---- (AISTOMi:II VO[. __OUA[]T_Y Be f V E H C E N T A Q E $ costa costs eoo tea eyM4m ) lW 1Q lG ~s1 OV41. Yo~me G00 TOO 1011_p From Schedule COST-SSG: 638 23.635,214 04.3% 6.9% 9.0% $19,841,436 $1,393,000 12,300, t NET PLANT 68YSTEM: =23,636,273 - 9,241.482 100.0% 1,247,402 , 2 + Land 1,247,482 - - 11e.ts4 I 100.0% 796,164 26,Se0,V10 3 + Construction-In-Pr09T 740,164 - 4 06.8% 6.4% 9.0% 21,887,074 1,393,000 21300,630 Fixed Assets - Net 26,660.409 flc.4el,wA ~ 100.0% (19.497,097 5 - Contributed Capital (19,497,007 1,zl e.t z< 100,0% J 7,219,422 6 + Are. Dep(Go. on ConL Ca 7,219,122 9,609,099 1.493,000 2,300,838 t3,3°2,tus 13,302,934 72.2% 10.6% 17.3% 7 Total Rd Bask 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% ° e,oo% 6 Rd Rate 6.00% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% res. na ~4e 72.2% 10.6% 17.2% 1670,648 1&M1,660 !)138,060 1;,3 1 Total 1798,178 a3l,ere Used 606,169 87,732 144,908 OD 72.2% 10.6% 17.3% l for Fiscal Year-> 1837,629 I I i SECTION 9 WHOLESALE CUSTOMER ALLOCATIONS (COST S5g) r I '4ECiNY1 1 WHOLESALE F.Y. 1993 WASTEWATER COST ALLOCATIONS A. GROSS BOOK VALUE: 91 - 92 92 - 93 1 Treatment Plant $15,454,135 $15,571,135 2 Interceptors 1,681,592 2,322,592 3 Lift Stations (112) 187,604 198,604 4 Total Gross Wastewater Treatment 17,323,331 18,092,331 5 Less Wastewater Treatment Accumulated Depreciation 5,278,016 5,733,136 6 Equals Net Wastewater Treatment 12,045,315 12,359,195 B. CONTRIBUTED CAPITAL: 7 Gross Contributed Wastewater Treatment 0 12,231,420 8 Less Accumulated Depreciation on Contributed Wastewat 0 4,528,885 3 Equals Net Contributed Wastewater Treatment 0 7,702,535 f 10 Equals Denton Net Wastewater Treatment (ROI) $12,045,315 $4,656,660 , C. ALLOCATION BAMS: 91 - 92 92 - 93 11 Plant Average Dally Flow 9,655,000 9,440,000 12 Wholesale Average Dally Flow 458,962 449,363 4.75% 4,76% 13 Wholesale Net Wastewater Treatment $572,588 $221,667 D. ANNUAL DEPRECIATION EXFENSE: 14 Treatment Plant 362,312 367,312 15 Interceptors 67,284 80,084 16 Lift Stations 6,574 7,724 17 Total Wastewater Treatment Depredation Expense 436,650 455,120 18 - Government Grant Depreciation Expense 0 307,709 19 = Available for Wholesale Dep, Expense 436,650 147,411 20 Wholesale Depreciation Expense $20.757 $7,017 E. RETURN ON INVESTMENT: 21 Net Wastewater Treatment $572,588 $221,667 22 Cost of Capital Plus 1,5% 9,34% 9 01 % 23 Return on Investment $53.480 $19.978 F. STREET RENTAL: 24 Wholesale Projected Revenue 357,915 x,•10,265 25 Street Rental Percentage 4.00% 4,00% 26 Street Rental $14.31 7 $12811 Page 1 -29- a WHOLESALE F.Y. 1993 WASTEWATER COST ALLOCATIONS G. PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES 27 Plant & Collection 91 - 9? - 93 28 Tax Rate $572,58888 0 $p 29 Payment in Lieu of Taxes 0,006651 p $3,923 $p H. WORKING CAPITAL: 30 Operation & Maintenance Expense 251,713 229,252 31 Working Capital Percentage 0100% 32 Wastewater Cost of Capital Plus 1.5% ° 12. % 33 Working Capital 9.34/0 9.001 1 ~ 2 583 I. WHOLESALE COST SUMMARY; r' 34 Depreciation Expense 35 Return on Investment 53$20,757 $7,978 36 Street Rental ,480 19, 37 Payment In Lieu of Taxes 14,923 12,8811 11 3,923 p ~ 38 Working Capital 0 2,583 39 Operation & Maintenance 251,713 229,252 40 C,W.I.P. Interest 0 10.222 41 Total Cost 441 8 2 1 42 Prr.lected Revenue $357,915 $320,265 43 Revenues Over Cost $13,727 $38,402 44 Shift in Revenues -.11.99% Notes: 1. Used 62.73% as contributed percentage of Gross Assets. 2. Used 62.73% as contributed percentage of Accumulated Depreciation, 3. 112 Lift Stations 4. C,1"i23r31rs!rjdy1931w193wwwhol.wk3 21-Sep Page Page e 2 -30- Roo 1502 WK. Fk.1 wrl.. DENTON MUNICIPAL UT)LjTIES 21_eP-a COST OF SERVICE ST'UbY ALLOCATIONS TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS LOgF sw WASMwATHRSYST of lC7LHSAfI3 Gvr7'f)MHR r -.1 LLT/Lq ovy.I,I m PERCCN T A G E S I902_0, fe) fQ - _ CIJST'OfdfiH VOL O 068 Cult W volrr,• IA _ $100 009Ta QilAIITY TBB C08I9 ebb I Wastewater Tretl L~ ~ +no,ll Plant t Iso eku z Interco ton d C NwI* olleotora 71 136 i• a Ulf Stations S 2,322502 04.8% 13T3% 22.1% - 1l2 of Lift 84tlo0e a'~7 - 100.0% 3,086,904 3,<43, -z-_- 1 - -(t 0e,ea - 2,322,692 --323 Solo. eon, v.u` _ 1 s Ciro;, N,a~few -100,0% 3D7__,_- Me-'~---_ ; 7 OOp :131 vw---- 89.b%- 11___A% 1C 9% - aNhonaoaF vu• ACCUMU TED EPA 188804 12,b63,014 - - a Wasimate, Tra A O - 2`08b,iF04 3,45_3,323 atment Planl 6 168 071 Ie,buzssl 7 IntarC fora d COlleb U 4bna 13,7% R 8 t ions 418,270 3.8% 22.8% - 100,0% ~3 291.00 a 1/2 of Llf} eta" 265,170 1}h !04,230 Totaf - 127,889 fOD.O% 448.27 L-- 1,173,731 s« w tic<_b~.olnun - 100. D% 266, !6'733,138 brly~tlNbn l 9T 87.2% 12.3% --2o.. % - --(127,889 BN Ma_bt+r•C`M t,n ~u Wutewata Tr tlment Plant --L.es6,18e 04.23D 73.731 „_j1_1 I IP Interco ore ii CWlect iD,412 f81 '----fs~sonx) ! u UR 84tlone °n - 1,878,3!7 65.1% 00.0% f3.1% 21.8% + _ e,ieD,B 14 t/2--_°iR8t04aom 111,129 100.0% - f,67E31r 1,38f.765 z,z96,s01 e» IS Total Net Warty'-. 70,716 - N•iPl t alef 100.0x 12 ,106 141,430 a"NOPiont ` 70.0% 11.0% 18.4% 10,71b a« N•t PLrq O 6 BJ27,849 1,361 30.76 Yr"• , 7b6 - 2ti2B9,681 ,a Warlawtler TretlrneFlt Plant 25.29 yo,, _ Iz,asv,Ies „ Intat WE Ore ^ d cbl 70,8% fo UR 94tl°n 80387,,3004!2 - f1.0% 18.3% _ ! 100,0% _ 2596ao - - It 112 of LMt 94tlone 164 a _100.0% - 40,430 _ 60 084 87,383 NO aN oy«~non eoM6ort F 724 100.0% F=PL•=~_ .If naa 456 }20 16148 "Job"4on•~ 78.3% B.0% 14-4,`6x - - ,724 a«o.arNrnone C rn• b•pr«~tlon r Weete Treat Plant AY - 347,308 40,430 '6 BN -~~n• a Corinth A Dab Flow Dab 0140,000 - (455,12,1 L-- zs tITRWD Av DoM Flow - 442 383 - - - 0,440,000 _ N B h Pervert} 7,000 <42383 140000 pA-gip pA40,000 12,383 UWD 4.89% Per~~ _ 7000 _ 7, 000 142,303 442,383 0.0742% _ 4.ea% - 7--~D-0 _ ~,Doo 4.Be% 4.eaz 0.9742%L_ 0`o742% 4.80% 0.072% 0.0742% ~I 1 , Beelovx,W S Pwl DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES cosr-ase wre.r. COST OF SERVICE STUDY x _B.I _ez ALLOCATIONS TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS WASTVWATax SYSTEM WI 01.&VAIX LIST(7MIi CALLYIT 1 'I11N5__~_____ - Be.. P E R C E N T A G E S--_- CllST'OMf3R V01. UUAU'I"Y Gym" 1N I~ Iq Iq C0 87B f,OBID TI!' 000 Tea AkceYon 1002-93 ael. vor+n+ Boo Be t_il9--__Lel-.__ e.eu G ROSS WAS E r Waetawater Treatmsnt Plant 15.571,1 35 _04.8% 13.3% _22.1% 10061,818 2,086,984 3, 43323 a«aon Book x Intercept orn 9 Colisotors 2.32 100.0% _ 2,322 602 a« aou eov, _wl» a UR Statons 307,207 100.0% --_-397,207 B« 0"10 Back vwe _ 1rt dL91 Stations - ~ f99,801 _ - -100.0% 198,804 - - s Grose Wastewater 18,092 33f 89.6% 11.4% le 12,563 014 2,086,994 3,443,323 e,au,aei , CCUMULA ED EP tECIATIO 83.8X. 13.7% . 22.8% 3,281,001 _7{ 04,239 1,173;731 a«ecc.oRrec~Mnn e Waelewder Treatment Plant (6169"971 r Inleree tae i CoUectaie_ 440,278 _ 100.0% -I--- - e t1R 94tlons 266,779 - _.0% 266,778 _ Bee N_,c. D"bdotba 100 - v 1/2 of Lift BGtlons 127,899 A__- 100_0% io Total 1220.6% _ (3,966189 _7(_04_239 _~l_173,731 Is.tso.i ml - V N WASTEWATER: ~n Wastewater Treatment Plant__ 10,412,184 13.1% 21.8% 8,700,917 1,381,766 2,2e°,681 a«N.nw,l _ Inlsce ors 8, Colleo/ors 1,878.317 _ 100.0% _ 1,978,317 ew No(P. t Is UR Stations 141,429 100.0% 141,430 a" Not gem je a o/2 of L91 Stations 70,715 _ 100,0% 70,716 is Total Net WaetewaMr 12,360,106 70.6% 11.0% 18.4% 9,727,819 1,381 766 2,289,691 12,3W.19e 1 r^ D EPRECIAnON ENBE: 39.76 Yowl 26.10 Yen - _ 1111 % 11.0% 18,3% 269,600 40,430 -X87,393 s«oegec~uon F~+ ene 387,312 III Wastewater Treatment Plant ITF u IMM on i Collectore_ 80,0e1 100.0% _ teo,084} _ B«oep«NSenensnw 7('6 1s UR Btatlone 16,448 100.0% - - 16'4J - Bw Deprw~Ben eoew. is 112 of Lift Stadons _ 724 100.0% _ _.f1,724 e« oeprealeBOn rpeno zo Dooreclation ExPensa__ 466120 70.31A 40,430 87383 14ss.r2q 0,140,000 0 M0,000 9,440 000 9,440,000 xt Wute Trsat Plant Av DaN 17_ 0,440,000 ~ xx CorlMh AVG. Dail Flow _ 442,363 64_363 442,303 442,393 442,383 xs l1TFtWD Av D8N Fbw 7,000 7,000 _ 7,000 7,000 7 000 x Corinth Patten! 4.00% 4.69% 4.89% 4.89% 4.40% 0.0742% 0.0742% 0.0742% 0.0742% Is UTRWD Peroent 0.0742% e M1q I v DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES coat-s u Aga 45 W.WK] Flnl wrNww COST OF SERVICE STUDY x1-e.A-ax ALLOCATIONS TO FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS WAS77f WAT17R SYS77W W/r01.If5A117 C7JSTCJMBR CALCU! 7TONS__ =----_--.-1 D O 1. L A R 5 _ M 9 RR UIIALTY - S.w. _ PER _C E N T_A Q E S _ jEi M eyR4m IN let Iq costa eoo re9 11d--- nal T WAS R A' 3R [.L()CA'II ON' 8,726,682 _ 1,569,611 2,274,092 tx,mWvs zs Total Net Wvriteavlar 12,369,196 f 1z.4z7,wt 27 Orove Conti ad Cap11Al 19,407,097 70.6% 11.0% 18.4% _ 13 72 '0 _ 2 144,681 3,687,488 ze z PlanNnleroeplorlUfl Al % 8237% 82,73% 62.73% _ 62.73%- 62,73% - sta. 70_.6% 1110% _ 18.4% 8,636,383 _ 1,345,456 _ 2260,681 42 zJIAZo zt . 0,116 9Ri1N••le cweh~w wr 12,231,420 70.6% 17.0% 18,4% 6098,700 794,703 1,328318 t,x+41n so Act. flop on Conb16. Ca P_ 7,219,122 82.73% - 62.73% _62.73% 82.73% M z PI a4dA ntero 9ptoNUR Sta. 02.73% - - 70.8% 11.0% 3,187,383 496,177 833,316 4sxe,eas >z X10. b an wn04164 C1nl C 1,628,886 6,497,OD0 647,279 1,417,206 702686 70.8% 1 7.toxsss a WhaN«~t NH cenrew•a Wyr1•wM 7,, _ 1.0% _ 70.6% 11.0% m1168 .4% .4% x,287,002 b12233 866,825 4,61 8.00 >t NN WrN w•Nr - Wtnlr •N N4! __--4 666 660 ss Who lssde Percent__ _ 4.76% 4.76% 438% _4_76% 4.78% 70.0% 11.0% 18.4% 156,496 24,383 40,787. 7211e e x Wholesale Wadswaler - 221,066 - llRPRL7(3AT1ONRXPRN'aTS' 347,258 -40,606 67,366 455.120 v eoletion Rxpenea _ 465,120 76.3% 307,700 761)" 234,782 _27,388 _46,641 sotto. y - a*W~ 0,•o! Dq. E>y •n14 - 112,47♦ _13,1211 211817 141,4t4 « Wh•N•04•Ne•n ENpW • 147,411 78.3% t4.78% _ 4.76% 436% _4.76% w Wholevdv Parcvnt 4.76% - =6,354 =826 {1,038 1,011 oo :7,017 783% -8.9x 14.6% _ N11 Whol•«N W rrWN- FiP •I.• - - O C A O : 4z Wholesale Wastewater ,2608 _ 70.5% B.8% 14.8% B.At% 18.01% 19.01% 39.01% Q1,eea u Ride of RalKJ on Wholeial 9.01% - - =10,972 76,9% 14.8% _ 16,239 ,778 2,968 ta,en OA Wholvsdv Rd - - CU R NT WORK 1 PROO HSS T 3 3 1ST: z 4s Told Month Interact Govt L Inlerevl =214.744 -~Cw O~% 47 107222 100. % - 10222 4436%I 4.76% %4.78% w~r44 « Wholesale Percent 4t Wholesale c.WJ.P. 6 RR AI. .1.OCA' ON' « Wholpdv Revenue 320,266 3.9% 86.3% 16.2% 14.6% 12645 212,288 _----48,643___-4688 Al.. _ 4.00% w Btred Rental Percent 4.00% 4.(6 12,611 ae Wholesale 81res1 RenUl $12 811 3.9% 68.3% 16.2% 14.e% 602 x,492 - 1,942 1,876 O 6,364 1,039 1.on e1 Wholavaly Depreclatlon. F s 70 7 76,3% 8.9% 14.8% _ _ _ _78.3% 8.8% _ 14.8% 16,239 1,778 J - 2,966 ro.on - +o,zxx ex Wholessly Rd-_ 19,972 - - u Wfwlesdv C.WJ.P. Interest 10,271 500.0% T 10,222 aa Wholeada efr4sel Rental 12,011 ~3A% 68.3% 15.2% 14,8% _ 602 _ _-8,182 1.942 1,878 1x.816 x.sex ss WoWnq 202L,al 2,682 10.7% 66.7% 16.8% 15.0% 276 1,618 404 007 zx a, x16 r -6-i M 221- _ 10.7% 66.7% 16.6% 16.0% 24,423 134,635 36,_838 34.368 xeLase et To1al,__„-__~~ X281,868 68.8% 14.4% 14.4% 235,422 _.V Z166~234 40,686 _$40,816 SECTION 10 DISTRIBUTION OF UNITS OF SERVICE TO CUSTOMER CLASSES (DISTRIBUTION 83A, SM) i i 7 OFNTON MUMCIPAL ILML1T)ES ols,"° R8613tl.WK~ F~.~ WATER & WASTEWATER STUDY INSTRIBUTION OF WASTHWATHR COSTS 21-W-92 TO CUSTOMUR CLASSIFICATIONS F18CALYEAR 1Fat-14M Who We T- Rwldentla Commarolai mmercid ommerclat Ovarnmen~lndueldel Regular sting Plac Equip. Svcs Water C1 _ Total (eRBRq IHO_BPI_B Nl_ I IBF]q (JFAI tBH1 lBaq.-_.-_.-_-. Units of Service' g 4 10,870 A. EstknatadAvp.Cusiomera Monthly 14,606 1,92 9 0 T70.28% 43 BB 1 Es 1,7618 1,Otle 12 4B 200,036 timated Bill a 174,101 23,147 87.03% 11.67%I_- 0.00 0.6~ -0.6 3% .01% 0.00 0000X 7~ -6 7 --~30t3 - 3,676 0 187 41 142 320 U 410 ,877 2,802,186 B. Volurrp(000'f) 80 976 1RD9 61,1167 119 694 149.050 1,098 914 1,304,968 2.18% 9.63% 1 B6% 4 28% 0 09% 6_3~%_ _100.00% - 39,26% 48.67%0.00% . ochemlealO 2-6- Demand(SOD): _ .T-_ o Bl W Volume Comporwnt: - J - - - 148,060 2,802,588 Mewl VolUme(000's) 1.099,914 5,304,969 60,975 14,899 61,807 119,894 3.786 3.766 3.786 3.786 3.785 -_3.786 X Number of LRen/Oallon 3.786 3.786 - 1 Annual Number o1 LIMn(000's 4,163,174 4,939,308 0 230,790 66,303 196,317 463,799 0 668,426 TQBM,200 e SOD Component: 260 216 (Average SOD MOIL) 170 260 ~ 500 600 260 2 1 x Annual Number Of U7eo(O00'6) 4,163,174 4,939,3ue J-0 230,790 -56,303 196,317 _453,788 --0 569,425 10,600,208 Annual MMigraine Treated(000's) 707,739.663 1,23(,67!,816 0 115,30511" 29.1s6,356 19,0791149 007,508 0 141,9M OUO 2,277J7b1,000 ,313 Divide by 1,000 7 ,000 Annual Orange Tresled(000's) 1,000 _ 1,000 _ 1,000 1,000 1,000 701,740 1,234,827 116,396 28,188 48,079 -909 - 14_1,800 2,277.761 = _ - - - 49.06 28.35 28.36 28.36 28.36 26.36 Divide by Number of GramslOunc 28.36 28,36 4,070 R96 1,731 _ 32 4,996 `80,344 Annual Ounces Trwtad(OOC 6) 24,964 431667 - 50.00 16.00 10.00 10.00 18.00 16.00 ONlde by~ Mumbar_of ouncwllb, te.00 _ 1e.00 __-6,027 _ = Annual Pounds Trestad(0000"s) 1,660 2,122 - 264 SG IN 2 312 2,000 2,000 Divide by Numba of PoundslTon 2`000 A,000 2,000 2,000 - 2,000 217000 156 2,611 Annual Tom Treated 127 -71:r 76o t~3e7 Percentage Allocation ,31.07% 54.21% 0.00% -_6.07% 1.24% 2.1 b% 0.04% 0.00% 6.22% P 1 I I r aeenmwxa rxei DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES w.>,■a. WATER & WASTEWATER STUDY ors r-s,9n 21- Sep- 02 IA 577L1 BUTTON ON W ASTN W ATH R COSTS TO CIISTOM13R C1.ASSIFICA710N5 FIBCAI YFAFI 1612-19p nesidentlal Co L n mmsrclal ovemm787nlhdustr mmarciy T-auor~ erely ly e0ular Plac Wholee Water Water 7 Svcs aNm a IBn1 eoq_ leaq_~~_-Total o Totafe0epended !20 (TSS); Volume Component: - _ _ - Annual Volume(000s) 801076 14,809 - x Number of LMers/oallon `3.7860 61,887 119,894 - 3.7560 149.850 2,802,188 3.7860 3.78&1 3.7860 - Annual Number o1 Uters(000'8 37860 4,189,174 4,930,308 _ 3.7860 0 230,700 3.7860 ° - - _ 58,39;1 198,317 463.709 0 .426 - __180 10,600,208 T89 CorrgonenL _ (Average TS9 Ap/4 - 170 ^ 260 - i k - 650 800 260 ' + x Annual Number of Lllera(Coo,e) 4,183,174 4,030,308 v_- 2 - 260 216 0 230.700 1 _ 68,30.7 198.317 4--- 0 Annual M019rame Treatad(000'e) 707,739,683 1,234,028,018 ~ - 17 - 688.425 10,606,208 0 128,034,706 03,836,820 {8,079,1{8 907,698 Divide by 1,000 1,000 000 141,908,313 2,294.928,074 1.000 1,000 1,000 = Annual Grams Treated(000'8--` 1,000 v _ ,000 ) 707,740 1,294,827 1 1.000 _ 128,0.16 33,838 i - Divide by Number of nrnmy0unc 28.35 28.35 49.079 808 - 141,800 - 2,204,93o 28.35 2S.06 28.36 20.36 -M- = Annoy Ounces Troated(0no's) 24,064 43,667 --T~ - 28.35 28.35 4,477 Divide b H 1,193 731 32 y umber of Ounces/Lb. 18.00 18.00 ` 4'006 SD,R60 18.00 w16.00 _ 10.00 18.00 Annual Pounds Trested(oo0'e) - 1,6e0 2,722 - 260 76 106 2 - 18.00 18.00 Divide by Number of Pounde/Ton 2,000 2.000 312 6.059 _s Annual Toni Treated 780 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 1.381 - - 2,000 2,000 140 37 _ 54 - Psr - canla0e AlloOatlon 1 30,84% 63.01% . 0.00% -6.63% ,147% 2.1.4% ---0,04% , ---100.063 +l T a SECTION 11 DISTRIBUTION OF COSTS TO CUSTOMER CLASSES (DISTRIBUTION S4, S4a, Sob, S4c, Sod) I I a11913r9,WKn FKr1 DEWON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES olsr-6r Wmftw"W WATRR & WASTEWATER STUDY DISTRIMITON OF WA3TIMATRR COSTS 21-erq -92 TO CUSTOMER C L ASST FICATI ON S F IBf,AI YE A0. 1991- Ia1! Residential Commercial mmerclal mmerclal ovemmenl Industrfal Wholesale Rog tat 6np Plec quip, 6v09 Water Total aRM BC 1) PT.9M fSEM (Sts) 1&11 _J o (SRI) Distribution of Casts: TOTAL COSTS: a, Coat Allocated to Bot't Wholesale 6 Retdl: 1 .T- - - $0 $o - $0 $0 - $0 to $0 $0 $0 $0 2 O&M-Depadmental 1,462,490 1,869,168 0 110,301 30,046 74,164 40,370 0 210,697 3,803,216 3 - Administrative Transfer 310,782 138,309 0 6.725 3,060 d,289 _ 71 0 le,6b8 481,662 r - 0-_----0 0 - 0 - 0 --0 0 ---'--0 0 0 6 $1,773,262 $1,995,477 $0 $125,106 $33,096 $80,453 $48,441 $0 $229,262 14,285,077 b. Coat Allocated to oWy Relail: _ _ - a Cutter lncome($63,007) ($63,967) $0 ($2,968) ($730) ($2,F,42) _._($6,978) -_-_-$0 ,$0 -($13_0,000) r Bad Debt Expense 14,601 17,323 0 609 190 _-689 1,602_ 0 0 35,212 s _ For Rey. Debt 188 FundT 607,766 793,654 v 0 63,886 13,464 _ 31,143 40,873 0 0 1,49Q 446 0 0 0 -0 -0 _ 0 0 - 0 D 0- 10 _ Fitted Aaaelm _ 98,649 117,041 0 6,460 - 11336 4,062 10,763 _`D 0 237,900 n ^-General Fund ROI 327,846 - 431,660 0 27,193 -6634 17,163 27,463 0 037,629 I2 Repayment 62,200 73,796 0 3,446 843 2,033 6,760 0 O - 160,000 ;3 aubI0tmL $1,016,946 $1,369,307 $0 $67,796 $21,036 $64,028 $81,376 - $9 $0 $2,621,360 c. Cost Allocated to only Wholesale: Ir Wiro(saale ROI ($7,679) ($10,220) $0 ($621, _ ($166 ($406 __($eel $0 $19,972 _ $0 Is Whnieswe street Rental Fees (6,216) (0,434) a (414 (104 (260 - (386 0 12,811 - 0 Is Current Work In Progress Intares (6,809 (1,163) 0 (6e _ (26 156 _ (1) 0 10,222 0 it DeWsoladon EVer"s {2,766 (3,fid1) 0 -(210 (66 -r (143 (243) 0 _ 7,017 (0 1s Working capital f 41,120 (1_233) 0 (61 (21 -----(40 _-A60) 0 2,682 0 Is subtotal. ($26,694 _ ($22,6190) S0 ($1,3A ($361)($909 ($1,388) $0 - $62,004 $0 20 Total Costs $2,764,303 $3,332,124 $0 $211,611 $64,66$/ _$133,572 $120,428 - $0 __-$261,866 $6,900,483 21 New Avg. Cost/1,000 Gallons _$2,61 $0.00 $3.47 $3.67 $2.50 $1.07 _ $0.00 $1.68 $2.40 v Estimated Revenues Before Increase $2,669,808 $3,081,793 $O $167,066 $48,496 _$106,395 $116,100 to $320,256 $8,430,743 J 23 Existing Avg. Ratell,0000als $2_35 $2.35 f0.0o -$3_07 $3.25 _ $2:09 $0.08 _$0.00 2.14 $2.29 r shlN In Revenues-> - 6J6% 3 -6 0.00% 13,06%' 52.73% -23.23% IS,66% O.no% --1L99% 7.40% i I b DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES p191 Re919l9.WK9 Fwrr WATER & WASTEWATER STUDY W+n.r. OI STSU l3U TI ON OF W ASTHWATSR COSTS 91_ew_9x TO CUSTOMER CI,A35SFICATIONS ! 13CA L YEAR 19K -19" Who ale Res den a mmerc y mmercTd ommawld ovornment Induutrld u 8vas Water R ular at gPlac q !P- e eRR ~ e = _1 la lem_,= a41_ -S-sow--=-5 0,02% Distribution o[ -Casts.' 67.03% 11.57% 0.00% 0.67% 0,20% °.6sz 0.01% 0.00% CUSTOMER COSTS: 100,00% Coal Allocated to Both Wholesale 6 R1 64.46% 28.29% 0.00% f AD% 0.63% L31% ---0_01% 0.90% 3.87% 0 0 5,768 140,973 943 1,944 22 25 $0- 98--.076 _ 42,141 IT qOS'04 71 0 06M-Depamental _ 18,666 -m- Transfe! 36309 -0 3,060 8,280 Admr 0 0 p U z9 234 - $93 ° --__$24,423 630,836 subtotal $406.837 $17_8,461 _$3 (3,993 $6, _ b.Cost ABocatedt00nNRelal1; _ 67.06% .i 167% 0,00% 0.67% 0.28% 0.63% _ 0.01% 0,00% _ +$0 p ° OOther Income 0 0 0 0 ° ° Debt Egrense p 0 0 0 0 For Rev, DebtI&$Fund 0 0 Cy% so 0 0 34 FtKed Aessb 0 0 p 0 Oenera) Fund Rq p 0 - 0 0 $0 Repayment $$0 $0 $0 ~sublotaL o. Coll Alloo Hed 10 only Wholesale: 0 0 $0 $0 $0 ~o ol - - - 602 (0 {t3 - ($tl - (fa) $p - 10.222 ° y ale Street Rental fees ($137) =0 0 _ a -,--0 as LDOP ale R $8,800) ($1,563) 0 ($5o _ ($26) 1366) I$11 _ AD t Work M Progress 11n fee - ($8 _ 75 2 ' 41 lall onExpense - $0 $0 np Cepftal 1$239 1$32) l$2 ($1) ---If 11 $0 aubtotaL ($9,676) ($1,273) _ $D _~I$63 ($26-- {$69)----11) $0_v $10,999 l$Ol u _ _ w Total Customer Cab 262 _ $177,178 ~OL $8,741 $3,965 fo,576 __$D2 $0 ~f3.16 $7.06 _ $7.65 ___$7,86 $7.86 Avg. COH/BOlktg~_ $2.26 37.66 _ 0rsr-an DENTON MUNICIPAL UT1uTIES RBII9W,W%>' ra,.I WATSft. & WASTBWA7'FR STUDY W m%wmK 131 STW BU T1 ON OF W AsT8 W ATBR COSTS TO CUSTOMER CLAS4FICATIONS 21-Bp-02 FISCAL YEAR 1902- ISM a e - - - otnmerc d mmaF- c~ ovarnmen1 In uHdd Rssl s~nt3a Commercld atln9 Plac •qulp, 8vca water old_- Reguler (ang Distribaio❑ Of COsts_ 39.26% 48.67% 0.00% 2.18% 0.53% 1.86% 4.26% 0.00% 6.34% fo3.oox VOLUrS`.' COSTS: 5.34% 100.00% - 0 a, coot Allocated to loth Wh0lesae 4, RI 40.29% 47.80% 0.00% .2.23% --0,66% 1.90% 1.90% - 0 ea 1-00 32,620.979 67 So() ,663 1,204,917 0 66,300 13,7_67 47,690 47,899 0 0 41 OI,M-Departmentd---' 1,016- 0 - 0 0 ---0 AdminlHrative Traveler 0 p 0 0 970 0 0 0.00% 134 ,833 42.6 , ;41: 6% $47 4 - ,899 subtotal {1_016,683 :1.204,917 ___-s0 0 :13,7 50 48.20% 0.00% 't.30% 41.47% 0 (130,000) b. Coat ANA Hid to only Re1dL•-- _ - - - (563,907 ($03,967) _ $0 _(12,988) (2730 02,642) _ (=6,878) $0 0 - 36,212 e1 Otherlncome p 809 a89 - 1,592 .s - 14,801 17.323 _ 0 - 894,207 u 20,667 6,023 17,488 40,42Y - Bad Debt F~ense__~ 0 370.824 439,960 0 0 I±2e~ For Rev, Ds hl 18S Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 237,80 Ve4 - 0 6,489 1,038 4,862 10,763 - - 98,649 117,041 - - - 0 0 605,189 yt - Fixed NaaV__..~ 297,737 D 13.912 - 31,308 11,634 27,66 250,952 - p 0 1601000 OI - 3,448 843 _ 2,933 8,700 ye General Fund R _ $p $1,742,688 62,r .00 7 _3,796 0 0 Repayment aublolaL 11743,31, $961,690 $0 41,207 $10,069 - =35,052 {01,026 C. Cwt Allocated to only wholesale: 16,239 I 0 (=360 (=2BB) _~0 ($0,319) ($7,7) $0 9 y Whoesde Rd (196 (48 (196 _ ,492 WboWssis Street Rental Fees (3,621 (4,176) p 0 0 0 0 0 64Ourrent Wak In Progress Ineres 0 0 2 84 0 (12(30 (106) p 6,3 0 es pepreclatlon F.xp enw (2,220) I (50)--1,6te (629) (740) 0 (36 $0 a Workiin9 $0 ($703 172) 16 98) - f0 $30,801 subtotal. ($12,089) _ ($16,066) - 31364 64 .2~4 4 $62,344 $127,640 _$0 - --$16$1.10 $1.64 - - - ToldYolumeCosts [~jl148,213 $2,071,$1Tb8 $0$98,804 t;165 69 69~1.68 ,Z5.06- Avg.005111,000Gd10na$1.69 ,68 I 1 1 DENTON MUNIMPAL UTIUTIES war-s1e R9e1sw WNS Fkwl WATER & WASTEWATER STUDY wrrw9or OISTRIHUTION OF WASTRWATRR COSTS 91-ew _9t TO C US`TOM R R C LASS[ III CAM ON S F 19 CAt YEAR 1912 - t ON Rr dsnXa CommerclaT mmetcTd onenewl ovwnment Industrial Wholeede Regular atin9 Plac qulp.8vcs Water _l~agrr_-{~a~Yt 1BE~_ -10M-_._. Ll__. _-1---~- sal - A 0 RI but LOi of Costs: BOD COSTS: a, Cost Allocated to Both Wholesale i Ri 31.07% 54.21% 0.00% -6.07% 1.24% _ 2A5% 0,04% 0.00% _ 0.22% _ .-10000% e7--._ - _ = 0 o o = 0 --0 00 0 0 0 r OLM-Departmental 170,116 312,510 0 29,204 7,136 12,421 230 0 36,838 578,464 r Adminlstrative Translar 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 D 71 subtotal =179,116 1312,510 40 $29.204 -_47,136 $12,421 1230 40 ` 35830. $578,464 b. Coal Allocated to ony Retail:_ 33.13% 57.81% _ 0.00% 6.40% 1.32% 2`30% 0.04% 0.00%____~,_. 7x Other Iocome 40 40so io 4o so 40 10 ° ° p Bad Debt Expanse _ 0 _ 0 0 .T....0 ° 74 For Rev. Debt I&S Fund 123,452 _ 216,303 0 20,129 4,910 8,681 158 - 0 0 372,011 I n 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 1 re fboad Assels - - 0 _0 0 0 - 0 0 p -0 0 n Owwral Fund ROI 29,087 50,716 0 _-4,739 _ 1,16_8 __2,010 37 0 _ 0 87,732 » Repayment v- 0 0 0 0 _0 ~,-0 0 0 subtetaL 41,2,619 1200,108 10 124,908 _ 48,070 110,677 1195 10 1400,343 o. Cost Allocated to only Wholesale: - eo Who Hera Rol (699 (5,026) 0 (98 (23 (41) -(1 0 1,779 0 et Who Weals Street Rental Fees (643 (1.122) 0 _ (106 1,942 ez Current Work In Pro as* Interest 0 0 0 0 --0 0 0 0 0 ° os Depreciation Expanse (207 (301) 0 ~(34 (e)-_ (141----- (0 ° 825 - 0 K Working Capital (134 _ (233) 0 (22 _ _.(5) 0 40'4 _ 0 -sublobL (11,673) (4!,744) _ 10 {1260 -(103) _ _ (1108) (12j =0 14,747 40 sy Total BOO Costs 1330,001 167E$044 10 163,816_ 413,149 _ 12.009 1423 140,685 11,030,791 ID27 10.37 Avg. Coll/1.000 Oslbns 40.30 - 40,~e9 - 40.08_ - 40.44 40.tl04E 10 Ii a Realea WKe Fk%I DENTON MUNICIPAL UTTIJTTES WATER & WASTEWATER STUDY D18` ~'tl DiSTRI NOTION OF WASTHWATHR COSTS TO CO: COMHR CLASSIFICAM S FISCAL YEAR 1012- 1023 Resldsntlal -Commerc d mmercisl mmercisl ovemmerd InduNrl - - - Regular etlrtp Pkc quip. 9vee Wholesale ~ - Distribution O Cnsts; -rot TSS COSTS! 0.00% 0,00% a. Coal Alkmatod to eoth Whotaaale a Ri 30.84% 63.81% 0.00% 51.63% 1.47% 2.14% 0.04% 0.00% 8.17% - 100,00% - $0 ja `$0 _ $D $o - - ea 06M-oepsrtmenlel J3~ $0 0 171,718 299,000 - f0 ° 0 3D,79e11,808 Adminlelrstive Transfer - - 220 ° 34368 66e,809 . _ 0 p p 0 0 0 0 F1 a _a p o 0 a D eR eubtol Rl $171,710-- 0 $0 $30,788 :$11,808 $220 - - b. Cost Allocated to only RaIaIL 32.07% 67.36% 0100% 6.89% 1.67% 2..28% $34,3sa_ $66 Bi80B Other I ncom a 0,04% 0,0% a - $0 $0 er Bed Debl Expense 0 - 0_ 0 0 p $0 $0 0 - 23 For Rev. Debt IA8 Fund 0 0 73,480 120 206 p a 13,178 3,613 6,098 94 1,,1 _ 0 223 '587 ar Fixed Assets - 0 Oenerst Fund Rol - 0 0 0 47,027 83,090 0 8,642 21277 3,303 - - ao Repayment 0 p- - _ ae__-.._0 144.908 a i o p p - - boo 0 0 0 0 aubtal L $121,107 $211,303 _ $0 $21,721---_ $6,790 $8,398 $166 o. Cost Allocated to only Whotosata; =0 _ $388,4%6 101 WhobeWe Rol Y - - - _ (972) (1 X096) 0 (174 __---(40 (e7) 102 Wholesae Glesel Rental Fees (010) (1,078) 101 --(o) a Currant (29 (43) Work In Propreas Inleret p - --.-(17 0 ITB7e p 0 p - 0 0 0 p 0 0 104 - Depraclation Expense p (341 (500) ma Working Capkd - - -(10) --(24)--- (0) 0 9,039 0 (127 ---(222) 0 T (23 e _ toe subtoleL ($2,060) ($3,688) Y $0 a) (0) 0 387 0 _-_._1$309 ~($98 - _ ($143) __I$3) =0 $0,207 107 Total T88 Coati $290,707 j6a7,31s $62,160 $13,001 - led $20,184 _ $372 _jo 4 $40,816 $926,284 _ Avp, Cos111,0000a1bns _ $0.20 $0.39 $0.00 j0. B3 $0.38 ._$0003_ 000_- $0.27- =0_33 ti EXHIBIT 11A UTILITY VERSUS CASH BASIS (WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS) i WHOLESALE UTILITY BASIS Costs Included in Retail But Not Included in Wholesale Department O&H Yea Yes Administrative Transfer Yes Yes Fixed Assets Yee No Had Debt Yes No Water Rights Yes No Debt Service Yes No Repayment to Electric Yes No General Fund ROI Yes No Purchased Water No Yes Wholesale ROI No Yes Wholesale Depreciation Expense No Yes Wholesale Payment in Lieu of Taxes No NO Wholesale Street Rental Fees No Yes ROI on Working Capital No Yes s, CHIP Interest No yes -40- v r` 4 DATE DESIGN I i I i 1 1 I \I RATE DESIGN i I. SOURCES Sources used for rate design purposes are the development of revenue targets, existing wastewater rate ordinances, and the Cost of Service Study. TI. METHODOLOGY The rate design was primarily based on the revenue increase requirement identified in the Cost of Service Study. For rate design purposes, the Commercial Regular class included the combined costs and revenue from the Commercial Pretreatment, Commercial Industry, and Commercial Metered Sewer classes. An overall rate increase was developed for this combined commercial class. Exhibit I, "Development of Revenue Targets", forms the bases of the rate design. The Cost of Service Study determines the total amount of revenue required to recover total costs for each customer class. After revenue provided by existing rates is subtracted from total revenue required, the percentage ra.e increase for each customer class is determined. Fxhibit III, "Wastewater Rate Design Options", is the result I from the rate design. -41- ~ f III. RESULTS A summary of the proposed rate increases by class are shown below. Commercial Commercial Commercial Regular _ ~a-- tlna-_- R es,_._ dde11ti y 18.75 18.34% 14 81~ 15.60- Whole ale To al Government Ind Wa 15.68% 15,62% 12.43% 14.00% Determinants and current Rate9/Revenue A. Billing (Design SI) Expected annual wastewater. volume flown in ' 5,000 gallon increments are shown for each Current revenues are -Aen customer class . and volume using existing facility charges. B, Proposed Rate Structure Design (Design 52) and This schedule applies the new facility volume rates to the information described in IIIA above to provide new estimated revenue. Roth current and proposed rates are shown. Total revenue, total cost, and net gain are form for all customer provided in summary classes. I I -4z- a~ IV. BILL COMPARISON Exhibit IV provides a comparison of Curren; versus proposed rates and sample bill comparisons of residential, commercial, pretreatment, equip.nent services, and eating places customers. For residential customers, summer rates are based on a three month winter average water consumption. During summer months residential customers are ~ billed at 98 percent of total winter average water consumption up to 30,000 gallons. Commercial customers are billed at 80 per cent of water consumpti )n. V. COMPARISON OF RATES WITH OTHER CITIES I Exhibit V provides a comparison of the City of Denton pr,)posc;d wastewater rate with Lewisville, Arlington, Carrollton, Garland, and Irving. Rates 1 for these cities are estimates subject to change by I October 1, 1992. I -43... 1 \ 1 1 I EXYIBIT III RATE DESIGN i rr Lei' 3 R041MINK3 Flnl DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES newr,x-s, 21-sap-92 WASTEWATER RATE DESIGN OPTIONS 03; 121'M CURRENT WASTr NATGR BILLING DETERMINANTS - - F l u ; •/~YEAR 1902-1 @~~ _ w w+ _ mmra -Emmrc om~ ro (;ommrcLT'" mmrili'T- -O ovr nnr J 11IIr-7iTiGl- I~FpT~~.7~ Rpvlr RcYYdnrnl MHrN 6,wr EW RYC11 E __J~ ~I ~r - II (B -1B Cl~CO) (By~ BfP) 4 e ~ci 1801 lr! (BON L _fSGCI I` Tot~l__ Jrr !@l,LJl" DETERMINANTS 6oMduM Wrt- Est. Annual B111147_ 84,101 _ 22,579 2H_~ 74 ^_11421 518 I,Ona 12 460D,076] Estimated Annual Volume Factor. 0 1Q89 700'" 59,115 7271 1,127 3,166 771 2,784 0,203 7,742 70,503 03 5A00 9,9.99 286,316 46,514 5,730 W 2,466 607 2201 4ASS 6101 356,801 so,ow 14,999 79,977- 40,50 090 773 _-2,165 529 _ IA25 4,257 5,313 140,497 15,000 19,999 26,725 _ 36,174 4,440 699 _V 1.030 472 1,745 31796 - 4,736 82,716 20,000 24,696 _ 13,059 32,780 4,032 _ 625 1,740 -427 _ IIA57 4,293 61,901 25,000 29,998 _7006 29,992 3,09 572 1,800 391 1,396 3,141 - 3,928 51,725 30,000 34,996 27,699 3,171 _ 532 __A1.489 364 1,311 2,927 3,854 41,607 35,000 39,998 26,002 3,194 496 339 1214 2,724 3,405 36,770 40,000 44,999 24,356 2,998 464 318 1,161 2,556 3,190 36,341 45,000 46,699-_ 22,91D 2,118 437 1,223 288 1,084 2,404 3,001 34,173 50,000 OVE _ 70,214 - 97,934 15,174 - 42,490 10,382 Y 35510 _ 03,549 104,265 1,185,596 TOTAL - 1,115,449 1,142,654- 140,538 217T7 60,975 _ 14,699 51,697 119,a94 149,650 2,617,694 CURRENT AT asud Valum6 (00( 1,099,914 1,142,654 140,538 21,777 60,975 14,499 51,687 119,/84 149,650 2,802,10 Facility Charges: 14.45 110.75 t10 75 t130.00 _$11.65 6+1.66 211.65 $100.00 i125oo 6533 Achin/Program _ $26000 _ $30.oo _ Sampling/Analys _ t3o.oD $11.00 Volume Rates/1,0 98.11% 100.0% 100.0% 100.091 100.0% 100.0% 10).07(• 100.0% 100.09(, 0 4,909 21.65 1215 2215 $215 $265 $285 $1.65 $0.95 $2.10 $1.67 6,000 9,998 1.95 2.15 2.15 2.16 2A5 2.65 115 015 2.10 -1171 10,000 14,999 1.65 2.15-_ 2.15 2.15 2A5 2A5 1115 Os5_ 2.10 1.62 15,000 19,90 1.85 2.15 2.15 2.15 _ 215 2A5 - 1A5 0115 A 2.10 1J2 _ 20,000 24,980 _ 1A5 2.15 2.15- 2.15 2A5 - 2J5 _ IA5 OA5 2.10 1A8 25,000 20AW 1.65 2.15 2.15 2.15 2A5 _2A5 1105 OAS ---_210 2.02 30,000 14.M 2.15 2.15 2.15 2AS 1.85 0A5 210 218 35,000 39,999 _ 2.15 2.15 215 2A5 2A5 tA5 OAS 2110 2.06 40,000 44,90 2.15 2.15 216 2J5 v 2A5 IA5 015 2.+0 _ 2.08 _ 45,000 _ 411,08 2.15 2.16 2.15 2A5 _ 2AS IA5 --~_OAS 2.10 y 2108 60,000 OWE 2.45 2.15 2.15 2115 ~~-2A5 IAA 0115 2d0 2.63 AVO.71,000 $1.62 2215 $215 $2.15 $2.65 22.85 $1.85 $0.95 2.10 $1.00 CURRENT REVENUES: _ Facility RevOnUe $7)4,749 32{$,1146 S2,623,1 23,120 $13,304_ $8,035 6f2442 61,x00 $$1000 61.065,423 _ i Z- - - - _ S I I i I I~ENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES nr7G,v-sl R091592.W149 - Flrwl WASTEWATER RATE DESIGN OPTIONS CURRENT WASTEWATER RILING DETERMINANTS \ FISCAL YEAR 1992-1993 i -L`onur~i~T~ '-EomnrcTi ommr oL ~rnrr+nTi1- Wrr - 4c"~cn'1G1 -r:o mmwraYT- Oummrc low ` 9putr R~1dn~nl MPIr Pd BcFr EMkV PYCU EQ oevcc 131 IBOCI 11`IIrrI ~IIr"~ 1. IBIIIMJL (BG.O) CURRENT REVENUES: - - - 5,•13 5,143 16,258 !1,916,06 volume Revenues, 15,6]9 2A21 4A92 2,1 [25 ` 100,556 12,9T,OtS 1,7]0 4,072 4,6446,949 62,973 10.729 1.662 6,110 I4,044 11_157 . $255? E00029.290 4,999 1,132,474 127,087 1A09 - 14,996 129,32) - -7?! 9,606 650 f156,999 714 9365 1,461 6,501 1d .--.19,999 77, . 9,015 3122,9 _ 70,477 6 869 4844 4,065 1 z1 ,1 1a _ 717 2A10 -_-"21 B9b 6249 3104A75 01210 4.560 1114 2,546 2A99 84,48 7,9]1 . 11332 0 29,998 - 1.037 24227x1 7,671 -1,144 4844 _34,888 968 77 2246 2392 7,151 756 SA58 1.066 6 601 _],705 906 2,148 2,426 8.899 0 4{,499 0_ _ 39,899_ 265 9 - 657. 2,Q00 2281 8,302 371, 48,257 -.9.059 040 3,466 0 49.898 0 _ 0 OVEF 0 1,719.sn 210,556 32,624 121,087 29,589 65,694 79,972 2,466, 920 WkSubbfl ~tf,603,B6B !2,/66,706 1302,157 _ t46,621 __$179,778 !42.462 {96,851 $113.699 - 8314,285 !5.344,709 Ir A~wage9H l-> $10.36 $107.34 $1,236.35 61,950.06 !15217 $51.97 $69.84 !9.491.81 !8,647.19 420.74 rt TOTAL HM- NU ES 42,579,41• f2,702,865 4]01,790 449,!{1 6187,083 $46,497 4100,396 $115,099 $320,261 $8!15,1]2 AvwuOa Bill-> $14.81 (516.13 $1,212110 12,089,68 $16302 $1n 1.19 $8,5800,6 __0,00% 024%. { A4wlm~ b Forec4rl OA 3% 009%12%_ 1%7 0.00% 000% ' 10885 _ $116,100 $920265 (6430_143, ~ $2,709,362 4306,474 f~ !167868 $0.496 $ ,3 Far4c4sl-> I it 1`091591W143 - First DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES 21-Sap-92 WATEn b. WASTEWATER STUDY 0112 PM WASTEWATER RATE DESIGN OPTIONS WASTEWATERI RATE StRUCTURE DESIGN FISCAL YFAn 1992-1093 Rpuw ,1161 Commrc Yl ComnrcW Cammre I., F o mrtre~l Commie Ml Commyew DorrrurrAtl Rqutr AcycYm+nl Inlu MryPYC4~6 A ~BnN) (GOACD) (9Pq IBEP) L_IS?4 Isen L~~-~_ 1.1Q___ ~f7 WM166CI 1 row Est. Annual Billings: 174,101 22,!79 b2 102 24 1,N2 518 ~1 066 12 48 2 Customer Costt 00,0.!8 lecn. oYl a $227 $7.63 $7.87 - - 3783 $7.67 $7.63. $7.63 _ ✓.~:763 f7.63 _$759`88 _ $3.14_ Current Facility Chmgeq f1.45 (10.75 f10.75 410 .75 3170.00 r 311.85 $11.65 311.65 3100 D0 $125,00 i $5.73 increase In Overall Revenue Requirements [5.700 8.74>_--8,i 6.74% eJ4% 15.41% 15.19%_ 23.12% ---__4.86% 6A9% _T Facility Charge With Increase $4.70 $ILBB i11.ei9 $11.89 - $130.00 313.45_ - 31J.42 _ $N,34 $104.86 $109.73 3569 ~_L...~__J 1 T 12 ]8% 2D 93% 70 B3ti V0 s3% 3.65% _~].59>7j` 11.59eS __1L69T. _ D po9 40_Op%- 6upgesied Facility Charges ~600~I_~ $}7.00 t1~ i1700~~_ j18f 00 313.OOIF j13_~~ ft37~ _310000 C_ i75,~L AdminietrelNelPregram Costs - - _ {3x0.50 Sn 00 BBmpllnpfMelysls Coats ~ - -337 00 3a7 uo _l _ Revenuer Generated From These Charges 1170,605 3207,427 $11,268 $16,704 $J,4W 314,646 fB,734 S13,p4 $1,200 $E,6Dn 48,0.30 NEW REVENUE TARGET (trDm Schedule Dial-34) j211,511 $54,669 $133,672 _f12t,4'..~281,85B_ _ 926,4631 r Revenuer I.Aft to Collect from Volume Rate/1.000 Gals, $1,443,7ss $x,081,063 --_-1____~_-_-~{188,685 f47,935,I~ s119,tl66 {127,22 (2/8,258 SS,ssa,433~ Estimated Volume To Collect Revenues (GO(/r) 3-1 _ I,D9$0P1 1,304,BM - `BO,WS t1,e99 53,997 ~118,194_.~__ 148650-I- 2,6D2,16r~ - -1-00 00% - _ Suggested VDI. Rate/1,000 Gals C _$1.00 ~~246 j2.45 3245 {246l~~ 33.40 $3,40 f 321fi~C f1 10 15 F- f2 i8 Current Rate/1,000 Gels 31.85 32.15 {2fb {21b $2.16 $2.15 $265r fl 15 6095 _ _-1 -A.=2.10 {2 19 Increase over Currant Volume Rat 1535% 1365% 136b% 13.95% 1305% 19.30% 10.30% 19,22% 15.70% -51.90% 0.00% Volume Revenues Generated f2,009,937 $31011, 71 r-__~ -jay 31b 510,657$ 3511,5 t4 3131887 - ~27B,853 36,OGi,ZT2 TDtrl Revenues Generated `2000,7/2 _`3,831,435 _ ~ $722101 f57,J8~~t125,398 51330$3-_fxr0,463_j V7.313.762 Total Cwta)Cort of Service 1112,704,703 33,332,184 $211,511 354,669 __$133,572 $126,424 3201,856 _ $6,908,483 Revrnu*Costs i - $110,036 f202,311 $10,65 12,722 __(38,174) $4,655_ -($1,400 f406,T09 Revenuer Before Increase x¢74,418 70573M 108,39T 6 116 098 E 320 Y65 J_ 39`415 132 Overall Ratelncrease 146_L_ 12 43%7[ 14,0a 11 b EXHIBIT IV RESIDENTIAUCOMMERCIAL BILL COMPARISON i T_ 1 r • Ir`e' : r I -WW 1 A IT OF DENTON WASTEWATER UTILITY CURRENT VERSUS PROPOSED RATES Rate Schedule _ _ _ Proposed Curreril _i_ Rafas_ _ Rates Residential ---9R Facility Charge Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 5.00 4.45 1,90 1,65 Residential without Water Serv-SRN Facility Charge (Inside City) Facflity Charge (Outside City) 5.00 6.45 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons (Inside Cfty) 6'40 6.40 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons (Outside City) 1'90 1.65 2.50 2.50 ~ Residential outslde Corporate Limits and with Cllhe of Dentgn Water Sen4ce~SRW Facllfty Charge r Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 6.40 6.40 2,50 2,50 Regufar_Commerdall=SC Facility Charge Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 13.40 10.75 Sampfing Charge (As Required) 1.45 2.15 Analysis Charge (As Required) 15. 35.00 30.00 Surcharge - See Below 00 15.00 Commercial Industrial without Water Service - SCN Facility Charge (Inside City) _ Facility Charge (Oufslde Clty) 13.00 10 78 Sampling Charge (As Required) 14.40 34.40 Anatysls Charge (As Required) 35.00 30.00 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons (Inside) 15.00 15.40 Volume Charge13000 Gallons (Outside) 2'45 2.15 2.85 2,85 Commerciaf with Dedicated Water Meters - SCQ 3/4' Meter 3' Meier 18.45 17.80 1 1/2' Meter 20.25 f9.50 2' Meier 23.50 22.60 3' Meter 28.85 25.15 4' Meter 60.00 7115 6' Meter 110.00 118.60 6' Meter 140.00 152.50 165.00 172.00 Sampfing Charge (As Required) 00 30 Analysis Charge (As Required) 16..00 18.45 16.00 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 2 Surcharge - See ealow ,45 2,15 Regular Commercial outside Corporate Limits end with City of-Denton Water Service =SC'/ Facility Charge Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 14.40 12.85 ,40 Sampling Charge (As Required) 2.85 2.85 Analysts Charge (As Required) 15,35.0000 30.00 Surcharge - See Below 1800 -47- CITY OF DENTON WASTEWATER UTILITY CURRENT VERSUS PROPOSED RATES Rate Schedule _ Proposed Current - -------~---ales Rates Pretreatment - SPY (SPA or SPA Facilty Charge 13.00 10.75 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 2.45 2 15 Adminfstrative/Program Categorical (SPA) 320.50 260.00 Admfnlstrative/Program Non-Categorical (SPB) 37.00 30.00 Sampling Charge 35.00 30.00 Analysis Charge 15.00 15.00 Surcharge - See Below Metered Wastewater - SM Facility Charge (inside City) 161.00 130.00 Facility Charge (Outside City) 195.00 195,00 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons (Inside) 2.45 2.15 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons (Outside) 2.85 2.85 Sampling Charge 35.00 30.00 Analysis Charge 15.00 15.00 Surcharge - See Below j Metered Wastewater Cale orical- SMA Facility Charge (Inside City) 161.00 130.00 Facility Charge (Outsfde City) Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 195,00 195.00 (Inside) 2,45 2,15 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons (Outside) 2.85 2.85 AdmInlstratfve/Program Categorical 320.50 260.00 ' Sampling Charge 35.00 30,00 Analysis Charge 15.00 15.00 Surcha go See Below Metered Wastewater Non-Cate oral SMB Facility Charge (Inside City) 161.00 130.00 Facility Charge (Outslde City) 196.00 195.00 \ Volume Chargo/1000 Gallons (Inside) 2.45 2.15 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons (Outside) 2.85 Adminislrative/Program Non-Categorical 285 Sampling Charge 35.00 30. 37.00 30.00 00 Analysis Charge MOO 15.00 1b,00 Surcharge -See Below Ealing Places _ _SEP Facility Charge 13.00 11.65 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 3.40 2.86 Sampling Chargo (As Required) 35.00 30.00 Analysis Charge (As Required) 15.00 15,00 Surcharge - See Below Eaulpment Services - SES Facility Charge Y 13.00 11.65 Volume Charge/1000 Gallons 3.40 2.85 Sampling Charge (As Required) 35.00 30.00 Analysis Charge (As Required) 16.00 15.00 Surcharge - See Below -48- 11 1 CITY OF DENTON WPROPOSEDR RATES CURRANT VERSUS _ ~-`Current { Proposed Rates Rates~~ - - Rate Schedule 11.05 13.00 1.85 Government - SG 215 Facility Charge Volume Chargee Belowlons Surcharge S 100.00 SGF. 100.00 0.95 industrial Water - 110 Facility Charge Volume Chargall Gallons Surcharge - See Below 125.00 75.00 2,10 Wholesale --22q 1.85 r FRc-lljh Charge Volume Chargslele Belowllons Surcharge 0.00159 0,00183 0.00197 Surchar a al Oxygen Demand - BOD 0.00227 Blochemlc Total Suspended Solids - TSS I -49- f ~ . i RESIDENTIAL WASTEWATER PROPOSED CURRENT RATES RATES A. AVERAGE CUSTOMER A) 9,800 GALS/MONTH $5.00 $4.45 1. FACILITY CHARGE 16.62 16.17 2. VOLUME CHARGE 3.TOTAL $23.62 -$20.62 i 4. CHANGE a) In Dollars $3'00 b) In Percent 14.55% P.. LARGE CUSTOMEr B) 15,000 GALS/MONTH 1. FACILITY CHARGE $5.00 $4.45 24.75 2. VOLUME CHARGE 28.50 $33.50 --$29.20 3. TOTAL 4, CHANGE a) hi Dollars $4.30 I b) In Percent 14.73% -50- 1 RESIDENTIAL WASTEWR 1 PROPOSED CURRENT RATES RATES I,.ARGF, CU-STOM--EFI A C) 30,000 GALSIMONTH WATER $5.00 $4.45 1, FACILITY CHARGE 57.ao 4s'S° 2. VOLUME CHARGE $62.00 $ 53.95 3. TOTAL 4.CHANGE $8.05 a) In Dollars 14,92% b) In percent -51- l^ s \ COMMERCIAL WASTEWATER PROPOSED CURRENT RATES RATES 1. FACILITY CHARGE $13.00 $10.75 2. VOLUME CHARGE 78.40 68.80 i $91.40 $79.55 3. TOTAL 4. CHANGE a) In Dollars $11.85 I bj In Percent 14.90% USAGE DATA A. Commercial discharge based on average monthly water corosumption of 40,000 gallons, and wastewater discharge of 32,000 gallons. _52.. EATING PLACES. WASTEWATER PROPOSED CURRENT RATES RATES 1. FACILITY CHARGE $13.00 $11.65 2. VOLUME CHARGE 272.00 228.00 3. TOTAL $285.00 $239.65 4. CHANGE a) In Dollars $45.35 b) in Percent 18.92% USAGE DATA A. Commercial discharge based on average monthly water consumptionof 100,OOOgallons and wastewater discharge of 80,000 gallons. I -53- EQUIPMENT SERVICES WASTEWATER PROPOSED CURRENT RATES RATES $13.00 $11.65 1. FACILITY CHARGE 080 00 570.00 2. VOLUME C~rIARGE ~ ~ $581.65 3. TOTAL 4. CHANGE a) In Dollars $111.35 19.1496 b) In Percent USAGE QATA.' A. Commercial discharge based on average monthly water consumption of 250,000 gallons and wastewater discharge of 200,OOOgallons. (Car Wash) 1 1 i I -54- I I PRETREATM!JNT WASTEWATER PROPOSED CURRENT RATES RATES 3.00 $10.75 $11. FACILITY CHARGE 2. ADMINISTRATIVE/ $320.50 $260.00 PROGRAM COSTS $35.00 $30.00 ' 3. SAMPLING 4. A',VALYSiS $15.00 $15.00 ~ 5. VOLUME CHARGE $1,837.50 $1,612.50 $2,221.00 $1,828.25 3. TOTAL 4. CHANGE a) In Dollars $292.75 b) In Percent 15.18% USAGE DATA: A. Pretreatment discharge based upon 750,000 gallons. -55- EXHIBIT V COMPARISON OF RATES WITH OTHER CITIES I A WASTEWATER RATE CONfFARISON WITH OTHER CITIES R!r_SIDENTIAL AT 7,500 AT 10,000 AT 15,000 AT 30,000 CITY GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS 1. ARLINGTON $14.85 $20.08 $30.53 $61.88 2. CARROLLTON $17.06 $21.22 $29.53 $54.47 r 3. DENTON a) Current Rates $16.58 $20.62 $28.71 b) Proposed Rates $18.97 $23.62 $32.93 $60.86 4. LEWISVILLE $19.10 $25.07 $37.00 $72.80 5. GARLAND $28.64 $33.91 $33.91 $76.05 COMMERCIAL I AT 40,000 AT 100,000 CITY GALLONS GALLONS 1. ARLINGTON $84.87 $213.57 2. CARROLLTON $78.51 $178.27 3. DENTON a) Current Rates $79.55 $182.75 b) Proposed Rates $91.40 $209.00 4. LEWISVILLE $96.66 $239.85 4. GARLAND $61.96 $185.64 -56- Y r \~i i ORDINANCES t I f i i HANDOUT TO COUNCIL - 9/29/92 CITYof DE'NTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 i TELEPHONE (017) 5668909 T Office of the oily Secretafy M E M 0 R A 14 D U M TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager FROM: Jennifer Walters, City Secretary DATE: September 29, 1992 RE: Previous Requests to Solicit from City Streets In 1986 there were three requests to solicit for funds from City streets - one from UNT students, one from the Lions Club and one from the Shriners. In 1987 there were five requests to solicit for funds from City streets - the Lions Club, the Shriners, UNT students, City of Denton fire fighters and the American Cancer Society. In 1988 there was only one request from the UNT creeks to solicit funds from City streets before the current ordinance went into effect. These numbers do not take into account those organizations which did not come before Council for formal approval. I know that the Shriners continue to solicit for funds in the City of Denton but they now go to drive-through banks and local shopping centers rather than on the streets. I am not aware of any other organization which still collects funds on a regular basis in the city. I Jen if r Wa t r Cit S cretar i r -_-^,1W HANDOUT TO COUNCIL - 9129192 Dare; September 3, 1992 130ARD QtJ13LIC U'S ILITItsS AGFNDA ITEM MEM13ER5 OF THE CITY COUNCIL MAYOR AND To' City rianager rell, rates I'ROM: Lloyd V. Har establishing a roval of an ordinance e City's Sanitary Landfill, 5Ut3JEC'1'; Consider PthP for uae of recommended approval at their RE.COI4MENDATION Utilitie E; Board 0 The Public 1992, by a vote of 5 to meeting of September 9 are unchanged f SUMMARY all Usersbeen added to the landfill rates for es have tru fi ck tires 1 The basic Two charges tires aitci shredded, 1991.42 scal Year between tires not the differentiates tires not shredded, which d2 00 each as the fee fortruck t ordinance $as each for. and establishes $ or halved, and onnel and quartered, ers halved, quartered or by Our land, 113_ to and truck must be cut of handling shredded, The tires in the cost tires no ment to cut the difference rohibit, tractor the equip tires reflects The ordinance P We do not have tires. halved because received aPPrOximatelY 10 The izndfill Were truck tires. 1 ,Uarte these red,e°tires, ~ larg roximatelY 30 relates to these year and app waste" this past Y to the ordinancspecial any The other addition charge Eor defined as of its 6.50 per cubic yard waste is because pecial a landfill- S id es tab lishing wastes eristics to osed of at he ination Of. sol thtdisposal o disP or comb hysC i or chemical charac and solid waste handling concentra tionquire special ent quantity, erties e the environment''. nvironm at the biological Prop health or the charges and protect the human with consister special handling, Ttle The Proposed rate !the cost e of wastspecial and reflects this typ ands of DFW lardfill expenses associated wi?00 cubic y stration admini ved aPProximatelY has recei 1.andf i l l ear , waste this Y W2292C Ir 1 HANDOUT TO COUNCIL - 9/29/92 \ I Date: September 3, 1992 PUBLIC '1TIUITICS BOARD AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL j FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Consider approval of an ordinance establishing rates for use of the City's Sanitary Landfill. RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utilities Board recommended approval at their meeting of September 9, 1992, by a vote of 5 to 0. SUMMARY: The basic landfill rates for all. users are unchanged from the 1991-92 fiscal year. Two charges have been added to the ordinance which differentiates between auto tires and truck tires and establishes $2.00 each as the fee for auto tires not shredded, quartered, or halved, and $9.00 each for truck tires not shredded, quartered or halved. The tires must be cut by our landfill personnel and ::effects the difference in the cost of handling auto and truck tires. The ordinance prohibits tractor tires not shredded, quartered, or halved because we do not have the equipment to cut these large tires. The landfill received approximately 100 tires this past year and approximately 30 were truck tires. The other addition to the ordinance relates to establishing a $6.50 per cubic yard charge for "special waste" disposed of at the landfill. Special waste is defined as "any solid waste or combination of solid wastes that because of its quantity, concentration, physical or chemical characteristics or biological properties require special handling and disposal to t protect the human health or the environment..." The proposed rate is consistent with the charges at the DPW landfill and reflects the cost of special handling, and administration expenses associated with this type of waste, The landfill has received approximately 200 cubic yards of special waste this year. w2292C 1 I v 1 li Page 2 BACKGROUND: I `Phe Municipal Solid Waste Management Regulations require operators of used or scrap tire disposal sites (Type I municipal landfills are considered to be approved used or scrap Lire disposal facilities) to ensure that used or scrap tires deposited at the site are shredded, split, or quartered prior to disposal. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Landfill users. FISCAL, IMPACT: For tires, this could generate approximately $60 over last year's revenue or will discourage receipt of truck tires. For special waste, approximately $610 in additional revenue is anticipated. Respectfully submitted, Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: F3i11 Angelo Director of Community Services Approved by: R. E. Nelson Executive Director of Utilities W2.292C swtIre. o L) L ORDINANCE td0, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON ESTABLISHING RATES FOR THE USE OF THE CITY'S SANITARY LANLFILL SITE FOR THE DISPOSAL OF TIRES AND "SPECIAL WASTE" AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 24 OF THE CODE OF ORDI- NANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON; ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCF.P- TANCE OF TIRES AT THE LANDFILL; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF' DENS"ON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the charges for the use of the City's landfill site as authorized by Section 24-4 of Article I of Chapter 24 of the Code of ordinances be amended as follows: TIRES 1, Automobile tires not shredded, $2,00 each quartered, or halved. 2. Truck tires not shredded, $4,00 each quartered, or halved. SPECIAL WASTE I For the disposal of "Special $6.50 per cubic Waste" as defined by the State yard of Texas Municipal Solid Waste t Management Regulations. SECTION II, No tractor tires will be accepted at the landfill if not shredded, quartered, or halved. , SECTION III, That this ordinance shall become effective I immediately upon its passage and approval, PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ day, of 1992. 806 -CAST LEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DE9RA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: h 3 EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITY BOARD MINUTES September 9, 1992 The following two items were considered together, 11. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING RATES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL SANITATION COLLECTION SERVICES. 12. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING RATES FOR USE OF THE CITY'S SANITARY LANDFILL. Nelson introduced this item, Angelo then explained that residential rates are recommended to increase 3.5%, plus an additional 35 cents per customer due to the State landfill surcharge, Commercial rates will also increase 3,5$ due to State landfill surcharge; it is proposed to leave the landfill's rates the same, with the exception of adding $2 for auto tires and $9 for truck tires, plus going to a $8, 50/yd for special waste handling fee since this is such a „ labor intensive procedure. Laney made a motion to recommend to the City Council approval of these two rate adjustment recommendations. Second by Coplen. All ayes, no nays, motion carried, I I 1 AGENDA ITEM #4 9/29/92 i DENTON MUWCIPAL UTILITIES Denton, Texas a STUDY OF ELECTRIC UTILITY RATES E • September 1992 C. H, GUERNSEY & COMPANY Engineers • Architects • Consultants Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Ex ti j L TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PURPOSE 1 REVENUE REQUIREMENTS 1 COST OF SERVICE STUDY 2 RATE DESIGN 4 COMPETITIVE POSTURE $ Exhibit ES-1 Summary Report Exhibit ES-2 Summary of Components of Expenses Exhibit ES-3 Summary of Proposed Rate Change Exl lbits ES-4 - ES-9 Graphical Comparison o Rates SECTION A Schedule A-1.0 Summary Report Schedule A-2,0 Summary of Components of Expenses SECTION B Schedule B-1,0 Allocation Factors Schedule B-2,0 Demand Allocation Factors Schedule B-3,0 Energy Allocation Factors Schedule B-4,0 Customer Allocation Factors Schedule B-5,0 Revenue Allocation Factors Schedule B-6,0 Cost of Service Commands SECTION C Schedule C-1,0 Cost of Service Allocation - Rate Base Schedule C-2,0 Components of Rate Base SECTION D Schedule D-1,0 Cost of Service Allocation - Plant Schedule D-2,0 Components of Plant -I- 1 ~u J s TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) SECTION E Schedule E-1.0 Cost of Service Allocation - Revenues sa SECTION F Schedule F-1.0 Cost of Service Allocation - Expenses Schedule F-2,0 Components of Expenses r" SECTION G Schedule G-1,0 Summary of Proposed Rate Change Schedule G-2.0 Development of Proposed Rate Change i SECTION H Schedule H-1.0 Comparison of Existing and Proposed Rates SECTION I I Schedule 1-1.0 Comparison with TUEC Rates SECTION J Schedule J-1.0 Comparison with Denton County Electric Cooperative SECTION K Schedule K-1.0 Comparison of GS Rata with Industrial Rate Schedule K-2.0 Comparison of GP Rate with Industrial Rate Schedule K-J O Comparison of LP Rate with Industrial Rate SECTION L Schedule L-1.0 Development of Rates SECTION M Proposed Rate Schedules -fi- r 11 4 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES t STUDY OF ELECTRIC UTILITY RATES F` I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PURPOSE Denton Municipal Utilities (Utility) has contracted with C. H, Guernsey & Company to develop a cost of service and electric rate analysis study for the electric utility system. The major tasks to be performed in this study include; • Review and evaluate Utilities' historical and future revenue requirements based upon future capital and operating expenditures developed by the Staff for the next three fiscal years. • Develop a cost of service study for the electric utility using mainstream cost of service methodologies and standards prevalent In the industry and used extensively In state of Texas ano by the Texas Public Utility Commission, • Review the existing electric retail rate schedules and Identify important rate design criteria which would be responsive to cost of service, competitlon and energy efficiency goals of the utility, • Recommend rate design changes responsive to desirable rate design criteria. REVENUE REQUIREMENTS The Utility staff has developed in detail the projected capital and operating expenditure budgets for the next three years. The budgets have been prepared in detail based upon expected level of prices, expenses and electricity consumption I { requirements imposed by the customers. The revenue requirements from the Utility 4 are predicated upon its desire to maintain adequate debt service coverage ratios as identified in its bond covenants, and certain cash transfers to the City based upon the total investment in electric plant. The budgets Indicate that the Utility will be able to meet its cost of service requirements, make appropriate transfers, maintain adequate coverage ratios, and still reduce the level of revenues by approximately five percent (5 or $2.7 million per year. FY 1994 and FY1995 projections are likely to change, particularly based upon projected cost of fuel burned at City's generation station, and the capital expenditures. The preliminary analysis indicates that it may be necessary to consider small rate increases in FY 1994 and FY1995, however, based upon certain J efficiency improvement and cost deferral projects identified by the Utility Staff, it may be possible to operate in FY1994 without a rate increase. It appears that a small rate increase may be necessary In FY1995, unless there are significant changes in the operating characteristics such as rate of growth In electricity sales, wholesale power cost prices to be paid to TMPA, and change in the cost of ne.tural gas fuel. Based upon our review, we concur In Staff recommendations that approximately five percent (5%), or $2.7 million annual rate decrease should be considered for FY1992. COST OF SERVICE STUDY A cost of service study has been developed using projected FY1993 data as the test year; the revenues and expenses are derived directly from the Utility's budget, The rate base and electric plant data are available in detail based upon FY1991 data. Since this is the most recent Information available, this Information has been used in the development of plant investment and rate base data, The revenue requirements are based upon the desire to reduce rates by approximately five percent (5%), or $2.7 million, The Utility Staff has been involved In all phases of cost of service study, including gathering the basic data used In the study, discussion and development of 2 I rr9" the concepts to be used in the cost of service study, and extensive review oft the cos of service study. The cost of service is developed using allocation methodologies similar to those used in the previous cost of service studies that we have performed for the Utility. The analysis is based upon a personal-computer-based cost of service model. A majority of the capacity or demand-related dollars is assigned using the 4CP, or in some cases 4NCP, method. This method emphasizes the price signals coming to the Utility from its wholesale supplier TMPA and emphasizes the criticality of the peak loads occurring on the system during the four summer months of June through September. A majority of the distribution plant is allocated using demand allocation factors. An alternative method is to separate the distribution plant into a customer component and a demand component, based upon either a minimum size or zero intercept concept. If those methodologies had been used, it would have resulted in shifting dollars away from commercial and industrial customers towards residential customers. The cost of service study indicates that not al, electric rate schedules are providing similar returns to the Utility. A rate design based entirely on cost of service would indicate rate increases for some classes and rate decreases for others. This Information is shown on Exhibit ES-1. The cost of service study also develops unit cost components. These cost components represent the cost of service-based demand, energy and customer charges that can be charged to the customers and recover the cost of service. This Information is shown on Exhibit ES-2 This exhibit Indicates that the levels of customer charge for some of the rate classes can be Increased, There exists a ` significant demand tilt in the present rate schedules; fixed or capacity/demand-related I` costs are currently being recovered through energy charges. This has detrimental Impact in that customers who use electricity efficiently by exhibiting high load factors 3 h i i t4 are overcharged and least efficient users are undercharged, The Utility has taken some steps to reduce the existing tilt in the rates; it would be a prudent policy to try to work in the future towards reducing the tilt by increasing the demand charges and providing a corresponding adjustment to the energy charges. RATE DESIGN After evaluating a variety of rate design criteria, the following rate design r, criteria have been used as the guiding principle in the designing of rates. • Rate schedules should be responsive to the cost of service results. • Principal of gradualism should be used In minimizing detrimental Impact on customer classes, • Proposed rates should be able to meet and beat the competition provided by neighboring electrical utilities, particularly Texas Utilities and Denton County Electric Cooperative, • Rate schedules should be responsive to the Utility's goals on conservation, efficiency, demand-side management and peak load pricing, • Rate consolidation and simplification should be attempted to make the rate administration process easier and simpler. Some of the rate changes in the proposed rate schedules are summarized , below. Res/dentlal Rate Schedule R• 1 This rate schedule Is available to low usage residential customers, The energy charge Is slightly decreased in the proposed rates. 4 , r~ f Residential Rate Schedule R-2 To provide proper peak load pricing signal, no rate change is proposed during the six summer months. The energy charges are reduced during the six winter months to emphasize the off-peak nature of the usage during those months, General Service Rate Schedule GS This rate class is separated into two subgroups based upon the level of usage. Customers requiring less than 250 kW of peak capacity will continue to receive General Service Small rate; there are no changes proposed in the rate level for these customers. Customers requiring 250 kW or more of peak capacity will be served under General Service Large rate schedule, General Service Large Rate Schedule GSL Presently, the Utility has Rate Schedule GP for primary service and Rate Schedule LP for customers who receive primary service and own their transformation. The cost of service study also Indicated that large customers currently served under existing Rate Schad le GS are paying higher than cost-based rates, All these classifications are combined Into a General Service Large rate schedule. The rate schedule will have a discount In the energy charge based upon primary service voltage delivery and ownership of transformation equipment, This customer gro!lp will receive the largest overall rate decrease; this will allow for a more cost-based, competitive rate design for large users. This rate design will reduce the existing Intraclass Inequity, provide Incentives for load factor and load shape improvements, and provide for more efficient utilization, Customers need to exhibit peak load of at least 250 kW In order to qualify for this rate. If for administrative reasons it is deemed desirable to control customer ownership of transformation equipment, It can be done under the proposed rate by 5 \1' I aklowkng the Utility the option of identifying a minimum demand requirement before transformation ownership can be obtained by the customer. Experimental Weekend Rate Schedule EWK It is proposed that an experimental weekond rate be adopted for those customers who exhibit substantial off-peak usage during the weekend as opposed to weekdays and thereby help the Utility with Its load shape and reduction in bulk power supply costs, The level of this rate is proposed to be twenty percent (20%) lower for the demand charge. The energy charges are Identical to the General Service Small rate. In order to recognize the off-peak nature of the usage of this class, it is also { recommended that demand ratchet not be applied to this class. Whereas this rate would be available to any customer who can demonstrate substantial off-peak and weekend usage compared to weekday usage, one group of customers who would benefit from this rate would be churches and religious worship facilities, Local Government Rate Schedule G-1 I The energy charge for the Local Government rate Is reduced slightly, Tlme-of-Use Rate Schedules TR and TGS It is proposed that time-of-use rates price structure should be altered to reflect the changes made In the basic non-time-of-use rates and to recognize that there have been some changes in the costs for the Utility because of changes from TMPA bulk power supply and the level of usage for the Utility, The proposed changes In the time-of-use rates would be based upon a logical application of the changes made to the basic rate tariffs, 6 4r T+~ i~ Lighting Rate Schedules LS, LO, L T, DD No changes are proposed in the lighting rates. Temporary Service Rate Schedule T-1 The Temporary Service rate is changed to reflect the price for the energy charge at the same level as that for Schedule GSS. Interruptible Primary Service Rate Schedule P-1 O i JI This rate schedule is changed to reflect the changes in the time-cf-use rates and 1 to reflect the changes in the cost of service. It is believed that the proposed rate would be more responsive to the customers' needs and the cost of service and may be more acceptable to the customers. Thermal Storage Incentive Rate Schedule TS The requirement In this rate of increasing the system demand charge by $2,50 per kW is proposed to be taken out. Energy Cost Adjustment Rate Schedule ECA Based upon recent information, this adjustment is proposed to be $0.017 per kWh. Exhibit ES-3 compares the revenue Impact under the proposed rates. I, 7 ,y I 6 b#! 1. ti# COMPETITIVE POSTURE It is Important to set the rates which can result in competitive parity or a advantage for the Utility. The two utilities that have service territories adjacent to the Utility's include Texas Utilities, an investor-owned company, and •Denton County Electric Cooperative, an REA-financed rural distribution company, Exhibits ES-4 through ES-9 compare the proposed Utility rates with the rates charged by Its competitors. Generally, under the level of rates proposed In this rate study, the competitive posture of the Utility Is Increased significantly, The Utility's rates compare very well with the competition for residential and large general service classifications. Utility rates are competitive at lower level of peak demand for General Service Small, One of the goals in the future rate design should be to try to reduce the difference between the competition and the Utility for general service customers with demand requirements in the range of 50 to 250 kW. , Y 1 wct uw nGMiY RA {l Y4 ~1Y OVA" NO* aulvedD8-u 1792 d ii.us)d DLNIGV MUNICIPAL UII[ITIES DENTON. IEXAS - POTTER COST PER EOEL MOOR LLECIRIC cOSI OF SERVICE STUDY • FISCAL YEAR 1993 SUMMARY REPORT ACCOUNT TOTAL DOLLARS RI • Resident R2 - Resident GS • Gen(2S0 GS - GeWSO GP OS Pri, LP - L9 Pri, GI - Govt Bld LI J#,ting T1 : Temp Svc RATE BASE 34,480,352 341,885 13,201,414 9,232,121 2,555,916 268,193 5,243,246 2,154,823 1,451,128 24,9 OPERATIWOREVENUES $4,642,902 101,106 20,206,866 11,810,541 6,150,192 531,291 11,311,583 1,215,360 121619,693 30,258 OPERATING EXPENSES 31,145,114 543,193 19,118,801 12,326,121 4,290,164 440,413 10,501,839 3,111,518 ,283 25;515 190 4,663 RETURN 3,493,128 ISi.'913 1,028,065 516'180 1,85),428 9D,824 $12,144 11,842 4 286% 18,852% RATE OF RETURN 10.131% 46.189% 1.188% 5.591% 12.148% 33,865% 15.501% 4.5411 21 RELATIVE ROR 1.000 4.559 0169 0.552 1.181 3.343 1.530 0,448 INTEREST 2,029,000 19,082 113,636 $40,568 151,610 15,959 323,315 121,613 15,841 1,359 OPERATING MARGINS 1,464,128 138,830 254,429 •1,056,148 1,101,801 14,865 489,424 29,111 118,031 3,31 -8.911% 12.2641 15,69 % 2,514% 0.161% -0.556% 101.4451 MARGINS % REV10 1.122% 18,215% 1.251% OPERATING TIER REVENUE DEFICIENCIES UNIFORM ROR = 2,239612 -2,120,902 -159,256 -132,404 122,914 -1,802,184 -84,811 -695,116 -49,582 14,838 -4,124 REV DEF AS : REV •4,919 2},4131 4625% 6.12111 •29.10311 -15164% -6.144% •1.5421 11.020% 13 630% UNIFORM %1UR : •2.420504 -2,120,902 -152,133 -125,965 1$2,6S6 -1,812,194 -85,652 145,331 -46,921 99,398 •3,960 REV DEF AS % REV {,9191 21,686% 1.5931 6.313% -29,415% •16.12111 -6.586% -1.459% 14.60111 •13,0891 a 1-+ rn N 1 I N f r n~ r . _ __r .s ,..,nom., Sauem 08 2l ~ 11,~~ E411TON MUNICIPAL UIILIIIES DtIITON, 1E8AS , PONES COSI PER FUEL MODEL ELECIRIC COSI OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 SUrnARY OF COKPON£ATS OF EXPENSES SYSItR lOiALS R1 Resident 452 Resid¢nl GS Genc250 G9 4¢N250 GY GS Pri, LP Lg Pn. Gi -Govt 81d ll i,ghUn) 11 - f¢Rp vc . I6 166 21,560 2,013 22,065 2,913 40 11 Average Consumers 151 63 kwh Sold 812,154 9,106 264,951 551~6C0 21S,9D0 25,000 543,000 161,500 6 813 235 kilt k62 11,11 89 1,213 Custoater Conponenl 3,121,961 202,419 2,4911292 618Q803 136?62 55.11 166.38 31816 6356390 13,43 monthly Cost Per Cons 1L25 8.14 0,01 0.22 1.22 0,08 0,29 Cost Per ill cost Per 42 Component 13,655,125 153,885 4,411,668 2,180,889 1,514,360 114,053 3,666,013 198,339 115,195 030 eraq~ 6.899319 16.899344 16,899719 Energy En Cost Per kAh 16.801055 16899349 16.899319 16,899349 16.899349 16,548280 16,540280 1 33 301209 1 061409 2 391482 22,886 9,36! 16 2,817,04B Ddrend Component 35,504,545 202,128 13,266,880 S,342 885 Cost Per ill Cost Per 42 Deand PUrChlsed PONer 23,865,360 133,415 8,818,081 6,12;6198 1,8908 1S 403813 5 10V0~14 1,5129391 19,059 5,353 1 Cost Per ill 1 Cast Per 42 OcMand Systea Component 11,639,195 69,314 4,468,199 3,22I5618 981051 983896 1'9853 9S 82DS 018 3,821 3,011 Cost Per ill k Cost Per kM2 Deaund 4 Energy CoNonent 49,139,669 356,614 11,141,548 12,t23,ii4 5,)91,415 446,214 10,.53,131 61.51 691 138,021 13,336 Ave 51,762912 48,539895 61,511691 20,258499 56.141992 Average Cost Per kMh 60,485300 39.162512 66.910415 13,815611 4COS",l6 166 11 681 2,910 61,919 ,606 3,119 N Revenue Related WHO 299,283 3,843 110,660 64,619 37, ,245,131 191,170 13226 Total Expenses 53,190,914 562,816 19,952,431 12,861,295 4,442,~8s 456,432 10,828,154 3 001212 Average Cast Per kWh 65,432911 61,813101 15,301291 18.194021 49,514100 52,433352 18,811181 68-11OS68 111, Il4.613226 M-Billing kN M112~ I I VWRW) fwbH-w ..e,e, . , ~.:.w..0 Mww j r1~~ DENTON MUNICIPAL, UTIIATIE 81IMMARY OF PROPOSED RATE CUANGI: (u) (b) (C) (d) tievenue" C tuu~gc Existing PTposod V t % 1, R1- Reskientia! 701,706 698,974 (2,732) (0.4) 2. R2 Residential 20,289,002 18,5391281 (722,722) (316) 3. Total Residential 20,969,708 20,238,266 (726,463) (3.6) 4. GS - General Service < 268KW 11,668,088 1108,008 0 0.0 b, GT - GS Thne of Use 142,440 126,034 (IC015) (11.6) 6. 01- Local Govenment 3,209,197 8,161,968 (47,229) (1.6) 7. TI - Temporary Service 30,268 30,761 494 1.6 f 8. Total Commerdal 16,050,002 14,986,861 (63,161) (0.4) I 9. GS - General Service > 25OKW 0,150,192 4,749,841 (1,400,351) (22,8) 10. GP • Gerxeral Primary 631,W7 494,070 (37,227) (7,0) 11. LP - Large Power 11,288,633 10,a92,534 (676,999) (5.1) 11 Total Industrial 17,950,021 15,94445 (2,013,576) (11.2) 13 LO.Other Lioting 16,263 161253 0 0.0 14, LT - Trd5c 110ting 4646 4646 0 0.0 16. LS - Street Lighting 364183 356,163 0 OA 18. DL - Decorative lighting 61058 6,058 0 0.0 17. AF - Athletic Fib!d Lta. 34,027 34,027 0 0.0 18. Dl - Dusk-to-Down Lights _ 229,940 229,940 0 0.0 19. Toted Lighting 6791086 679,086 0 0.0 x' J. U 20. Total DMU 64,642,817 61,840,637 (2,02•'80) (611) " Ctl I 1 COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES 1 RESIDENTIAL - SUMMER $250 Existing $200 - Proposed r' $150 TUEC C~ DCEC $100 m $50 xcr Ji m Lo $0 A 500 750 1, 000 21500 kWh Usage i 1 COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES RESIDENTIAL - WINTER 1 $180 C] $160 - - Existing $14~ v Proposed $120 _ TU EC N $100 ° DCEC s J• _ J~ $20 f1 m N I Ch $0 500 750 11000 21500 kWh Usage COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES GENERAL SERVICE @ 20kW $1,000 $900 Existing , $800 $700 Proposed $600 TUEC U $500 $400 DCEC $300- $200 - x $100 - $0 2,920 59840 81760 11,680 kWh Usage ~I p9m COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES GENERAL SERVICE @ 50kW' $2,000 $1,800 - Existing Proposed $1,400 ~ ~ $1,200 - TUEC U $1,000 ~ ~ DCEC $600 - $400 f $200 rt m N I V $0 71300 14,600 21,900 295200 kWh Usage i I I ~y 7 COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES GENERAL SERVICE 14okW $4,000 rx ing $3,500 osed $ 3,000 _ TU EC $2,500 DCEC U $2,000 i a ' $1,500 m $1,000 _ J• $500 y - co $0 14,600 29,200 43,800 589400 kWh Usage COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES GENERAL SERVICE @ 500kW $20 $18 --f~ Existing _ Proposed $14 - $12 TUEC DCEC $s _ m $4 x cr J• $2 m to I W $0 73,000 146,000 219,000 292,000 kWh Usage d I Ces,` DI;,*/J w4w Solved; 08-21-1992 ® 17;03;38 I ~I DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 4 SUMMARY REPORT ACCOUNT TOTAL DOLLARS RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL LIWTING RATE BASE 340480,352 13,543,300 11,411,910 8,067,415 1,457,728 OPERATING REVENUES 54,642,902 20,908,572 15,056,165 17,999,072 679,093 OPERATING EXPENSES 51,149,774 19,722,594 15,469,820 15,236,076 721,283 ; RETURN 3,493,128 1,185,978 -413,655 2,762,996 -42,190 RATE OF RETURN 10.131% 8.757% -3,625% 34.249% -2.894% RELATIVE ROR 11000 0,864 -0.358 3.381 -0.286 INTEREST 2,029,000 792,718 669,541 490,895 75,847 OPERATING MARGINS 1,464,128 393,260 -1,083,196 2,272,101 -118,037 MARGINS % OF REVENUE 2.679% 1.881% -7.194% 12,623% -17,382% OPERATING TIER 1.722 1.496 -0.618 5.628 -0.556 REVENUE DEFICIENCIES UNIFORM ROR = 2.239612 -2,720,902 -882,660 669,238 -2,582,317 74,838 REV DEF AS `K REV -4,979% --4.222`K 4,4455 -14,347% 11,020% UNIFORM A% MAR = -2,420504 -2,720,902 -878,098 701,774 -2,643,776 99,198 REV DEF AS A REV -4.979% -4,200% 4.661% -14,688% 14,607% b N w C1 (a =r m m a V L' O fD 4j A N I ,r O i:y T Solved; 08.21-1992 0 11;03,38 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILMI!S DEMON, IE8A$ c RJER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY . FISCAL YEAR 1993 SUMMARY PERRI AWN; TOTAL DOLLARS 01 - Resident R2 Resident GS • Gen(250 GS . Gen)250 GP - GS Pri, tP • Lg Pri, 01 . Govt Bld LT - Lighting Et - Temp Svc _ RATE BASE 34,490,352 341,805 13,201,414 9,232,121 2,555,976 268,193 5,243,246 2,154,823 1,451,128 24, OPERATING REVENUES 54,642,902 101,106 20,206,866 11,810,541 6,150,192 531,291 11,311,583 3,215,360 619,093 30,258 OPERATINOEXPENSES 51,149,114 543,193 19,118,801 12,326,127 4,290,164 440,473 10,504,839 3,111,518 721,283 25,515 RETURN 3,493,128 151,913 1,028,065 -516,160 1,859,428 90,824 812,144 91,642 •42,190 4,683 RATE OF RETURN 10,13111 46,189% 1,188% •5,591 12,7481 33.865% 151501% 4,541% -2.891% 18.759% RELATIVE ROR 1,000 4.559 0.169 •0.552 1.181 3.343 1.530 0,448 •0.286 1,852 INTEREST 2,029,000 19,082 113,636 540,568 151,620 15,959 323,315 127,613 15,841 1,359 OPERATING KAROINS 1,464,128 138,830 254,424 1,056,148 1,707,801 74,865 489,429 29,711 118,031 3,324 MARGINS % REVENUE 1.122% 16,215% 1.329% -0.147% 21.166% 15,691% 2,514% -0326 0.161% -0,556% 10,445% OPERATING TIER J REVENUE DEFICIENCIES 14 UNIFORM ROR ..2.239612 2,1-4.119% 1201,413% -132,404 126,121% 1 829.303% -84,817 696144% {1.542% 11.020% .4,124 g6o REV DEF AS III, REV UNIFORM % MAR = 2.420504 -2,120,902 -152,133 -21.680% -125,965 IS2,656 1 -29,415% $6121% 116586% +1.459% 14.601% •13089% p{y p{f AS II REV -o Vl a' n w ro ro n ' N C J C) IU N l H O i r cam D~~1 Solved: 08-21-1992 @ 17;03:38 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITiFS DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL YEAR 1993 ELECTRICCOST OF SERVICE SSTUDY OF - FISCAL EXPNSES S~ARY OF COMPONENTS OF EXPENSES I NG LIGHTING SYSTEM TOTALS RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL ~ 202 67 153 27,560 24,138 3, 212,020 319,854 kWh soAverageld Consumers 5120754 274,067 743,900 kw1 719,100 6,813 kW2 37,311 655,390 Monthly Cost Per 3,721,961 2,299,648 728,455 46.41 356,97 Customer Cater Cons 11,25 7,94 18,96 1,01 0,05 Cost Per kW1 cost Per kW2 5,324,493 115,135 13,655,125 4,631,554 3,583,000 16,85,349 Energy component 16,801055 16,899349 16,899349 16,646636 Average Cost Per kW 22,986 Demand Component 35,504,545 13,469,608 11,7456.33 100266,598 Cast Per kW1 Cost Per kW2 7,1940868 19,059 23,865,360 8,951,495 7,699098 9,67 Demand Purchased Power cost Per kW1 Cost Per kW2 3,0710730 3,827 11,6390185 40518,113 4,045,515 Demand System Component 5,63 4,13 ,o m Cost Per kW 1 Cost Per kW2 1380021 c 60,485300 18, 66,101,162046485 1723297204 148744399 20.258499 0 m Daw•:ind & Energy Component 49,1590669 y Ave^age Cost Per kWh 58,569 3,719 N 299,283 114,502 820453 a Revenue Related Expense 797,130 Total Expenses 53,180,914 20,515,312 1761121879 1397169218 117,001272 Average cost Per kWh 65,432977 74.855099 kW1-Billing kw kW2=. 7 CbI~"~'""RN-3 Solved; 06-21-1992 ~ 11;0316 OENION MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTOR, TEXAS : POWER COST PER FVEI MOOEI. ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE S1U9Y • FISCAL YEAR 1933 SUIWARY OF &PONENIS OF EXPENSES SYSTEM TOTALS RI Resident 92 - Resident GS - Oenl2S0 GS - GeN250 GP - GS Pri. LP l9 Pri. Gi - Govt Bld Ll - lighting 71 - Terp Svc 11 16 166 153 67 Average Consumers 21,569 2,013 22,665 2,913 40 8,105 221,538 k1h Sold 812,154 9,106 264,961 161,600 2819,900 26,000 503,000 161,20 6811 255 k11 , k12 Customer Component 3,721,961 202,419 2,0912283 6188 116 02 9514 16638 3651898 8155.93 1IL11 0,08 0,29 9,03 0,22 Monthly Cost Per Cons 11,25 8,11 cost Per kit 1,22 Cost Per M 4,111,668 2,180,889 1,914,768 144,053 3,666,013 198,139 111,135 3,911 EnergyCamponent 13,695,129 153,885 16,849144 16,899749 Avenge Cost Per kWh 16,801959 16,899319 16,899319 16,849319 16.894349 l6,S18280 16.918280 16,899314 ,048 Dmrnd caponent 35,994,549 202,128 13,266,880 g,342 885 16 218113 33 3012199 1,087,15S 2 3911282 22,866 9,364 . 14 . 01 Cask for W Cost Per 42 Dearnd Purchased Power 23,865,360 133,419 8,618,081 6,1210196 1,890,80142 5 203$293 5,101, 526 U 1,5129333 19,099 6,353 Cost Per k11 Cost Per R12 816 Oemand System Component 11,639,185 69,314 4,4480199 3,22156388 967,003 98,8936 1,98536332 9205 06 3,821 3,011 w Cast Per k11 19. n~ m (D Cast Per k12 Dound i Enersy Component 49,159,669 356,814 11,144,548 12,123,114 4,391,415 446,244 10,153,431 3,191,343 138,021 13,336 N c 60.489300 39.162512 66.910415 13.615613 44,005316 11.262912 18.539895 61.571691 20.258499 561141932 o m Arera9e Cast Per kWh 166 N N Revenue Related Expense 299,283 3,843 110,660 64,619 33,681 2,910 61,979 11,608 3,719 o Total Expenses 53,180,914 $62,816 19,992,131 12,867,241 4,442,365 496,432 10,828,151 3,243,131 791,130 26,934 Average Cost Per k1h 65.432917 61,813101 15,303't9i 18.194421 49.514100 12.433312 48.871181 68.710568 111,001212 114.613226 k12~, i I I Old" x°1"""'3 et Solved, 08-21-1992 ® 17:03:38 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 ALLOCATION FACTORS A.F. FACTOR TOTAL PERCENT RESIDENTIAL O"ERCIAL INDUSTRIAL LIGHTINO --------1 DI 12 2 D2 - 4 CP 100.000000 31,722665 32,705922 34,717384 -----0.854029 100,000000 37,508319 32,264076 30.147744 0,079862 , 3 D3 - 4 NCP Primary 100,000000 36.564031 33,589923 29,846046 0.000000 ' 4 D4 - 4 NCP #1 Second 100,000000 5 D5 - 4 NCP #2 Second 100,000000 46,11780839 42'889354 10,413844 11 6 Et - kWh sales 42,415317 0,000000 100,000000 33,720781 26.086614 39,354343 (1,8j8261 7 E2 - kWh Purchascs 100,000000 33,920405 8 C1 - Average cost, )001000000 88,024214 12.241 1.6767056 38.995328 0,843223 9 02 - Meter Reading 100,000000 71.993455 0.244329 0.054711 10 C3 - A/C 369 Service 100.000000 0 25.240490 2,619444 0,146145 11 C4 - A/C 370 Meters 100.000000 58,797165 39,193238 1,863445 0,1146153 12 C5 - A/C 371 Sec Lts 100.000000 13 C6 - A/C 373 City Lt 0.0000G0 0,000000 0,000000 100.000000 14 R1 - Base Revenues 1 100.000000 00,000000 0,000000 0,000000 0.000000 100,000000 15 R2 - E,C,A. Revenues 100,000000 33,820863 26,086582 39.354295 0.838260 101 PRODUCTION PLANT 100,000000 37,508319 32,264076 30.147744 0.079862 102 TRAN.SMISION PLANT 100,000000 37,508319 32,264076 30,147744 0.079862 103 A/C 364/365 OH Lines 100,000000 38.082405 34,984793 26,932803 104 05 A/0 66/367 UG Lines 1100.000000 00,000000 38,082406 34,984794 0,000000 1 DISTRIBUTION PLANT 40,519957 33,681037 28.661595 70.11370400 106 SUBTOTAL PLANT 100,000000 39,069394 32.998554 24.193924 3,738127 107 GENERAL PLANT 100,000000 39,069394 32,998554 24.193924 3.738127 108 PLANT 100.000000 109 REVENUES 39 069394 32.,998554 `14,193924 cA 100.000000 38,264022 27,553743 3.738727 10(A 0) 0 110 Demand PP 100,000000 37,508319 32,939451 1.242784 111 Subtotal PURCHASED POWER 32.264076 30.147744 0.079862 a ~ 112 PP-VARIABLE 100,000000 37,500319 32,264076 30,147744 100,000000 33,920405 26,241044 0,079862 3.995328 0.843223 113 PURCHASED POWER 100,000000 36,353129 30,324859 32,996373 0,325639 114 PRODUCTION 08m 100,000000 35,731036 29.280551 34,530419 0,457995 , 115 TRANMSISSICNJ 0&1 100.000000 37,508319 32,264076 30,147744 0,079862 0 116 DISTRIBUTION 08M 100.000000 39.445617 33,802426 18,976408 7.775550 117 CUSTOMER ACOOUNTS 100,000000 70,77006', 20,118295 8,746056 0,365585 I 1 . 3 Solveds 08-21•-1992 @ 17,03:38 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL 1 STUDY -FISCAL YEAR 1993 ELECTRIC LUST OF SERVICE ALLOCATION FACTOPS 1 A.F. FACTOR TOTAL PERCENT RESIDENTIAL CCtffRCIAL INDUSTRIAL - - LIGHTING 100.000000 31,722665 32.705922 34.717384 0.854029 1 D1 - 12 CP---------- 2 02 - 4 CP 100.000000 37.508319 32.264076 30,147744 0.079862 3 D3 - 4 NCP Primary 100.00001)0 36,564031 33.58'3923 29,846046 0.000000 23 42.88,3054 10.424423 0.000000 4 04 - 4 NCP #1 Second 100.000000 46.6865 5 D5 - 4 NCP #2 Second 100,000000 46.170839 42.415317 11.413844 0.000000 6 E1 - kWh Sales 100.000000 33.720781 26.086614 39.354343 0.838261 7 E2 - kWh Purchases 100,000000 33.920405 26.241044 38.995328 0,843223 11 4329 8 Cl - Average Oust, 1100,000000 00.000000 81, 993455 25.240490 0.649444 0.0466 1 9 C2 - Meter Reading 10 C3 - A/C 369 Service 100.000000 70.960724 27.473836 1,499294 0.06614 11 C4 - A/C 37s 100.000000 12 5 - A/C 370 eceLts 100.000000 50.000000 30.000000 0,000000 100.000000 13 C6 - A/C 373 City Lt 100,000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 100.000000 14 R1 - Base Revenues 100.000000 39.801571 28.050277 30.768465 1.379687 15 R2 - E.C.A. Revenues 100.000000 33.720863 26.066582 39.354295 0,838260 101 PRODUCTION PLANT 100.000000 37.508319 32.264076 30.147744 0,079862 102 TRANSMISION PLANT 100.000000 37.508319 32.264076 30.147744 0.079862 103 A/C 364/365 OH Lines 100,000000 36.082405 34.964793 26.932803 0,000000 1 104 A/C 366/367 UO Lines 100.000000 38.082406 34.984794 26,932801 0.0304010 105 DISTRIBUTION PLANT 100.000000 40.519957 33.681037 18.661595 3.138127 106 SU SUBTOTAL PLANT 100.000000 39.069394 32.998554 24.193924 3,738127 107 BTOTA PLANT 100,000000 39.069394 32.998554 24.19e924 3,738127 -V V 108 PLANT 100.000000 39.06'3394 32.998554 24.193924 1 242784 m r 109 REVENUES 100,000000 38.264022 27.553743 32.939451 0.079862 c 110 Demand PP 100.000000 37.508319 32.264076 30.147744 o m 111 Subtotal PURCHASED POWER 100.000000 37.508319 32.264076 30.147744 0.079862 ~ w 112 PP-VARIABLE 100.000000 33.920405 26.241044 38.995328 0,843223 100.000000 36.353129 30.324859 32.9963'13 0.325639 113 PURCHASED POWER 0 PRODUCTION OWE 100.000000 35,731036 29.280551 .34.530419 0,457995 1RO 0 100,000000 37.508319 32.264076 30.147744 0.079862 115 PR4 1 DUON 08d1 115 DISTRIBUTION 0849 100.000000 39.445617 33.802426 18,976408 7,775550 117 CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS 100.000000 70.770063 20.118295 8.746056 0.365585 II DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 ALLOCATION FACTORS A.F. FACTOR TOTAL PERCENT RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING I 118 CUSTOMER SERVICES 100.000000 88.024214 11.676756 0.244329 0.054701 119 A&G AIIocator 100.000000 44.257706 28.575517 24.482372 2.684405 120 ADMIN. & GENERAL 100.000000 44.257706 28.575517 24.482372 2.684405 121 DEPRECIATION 100.000000 39.501105 33.201672 22.547413 4.749810 122 TAXES 100.000000 39.069394 32.998554 24.193924 3.738127 123 OTHER REVENUES 100.000000 69.641970 19.682965 9.237260 1.437805 124 EXPENSES 100.000000 38.556517 30.244161 29.787182 1.410139 125 RATE BASE 100.000000 39.278310 33.096848 23.397137 4.227705 126 INTEREST 100.000000 39.069394 32.998554 24.193924 3.738127 ,r -o to (o ~ m m a NC_ O m A 1 N O at¢s" 7 Solved: 08.21-IS92 4 11:03 38 DEN10N FPiNICIPAL UTILITIES DENT04, IEIUS : POWER COST PER FUEL OK ELECTRIC COST Cf SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 ALLOCATION FACTORS TOTAL PERCENT RI Resident R2 - Resident GS - Dan t250 GS _ w)250 GP : GS Pri. LP - Lg Fri, GI Govt 61d LT : ti9htin9 T1 INV Svc A.F FACTOR I Dl - 12 CP 100.000000 1.112465 34,610181 25.289358 9.838184 1.118193 23.761091 1,382852 0.854029 0.033112 2 0019862 0.026fi21 02 - 4 CP 100,000400 0359031 36.949288 28.648818 81.1642 11 .119606 00.851657 .814138 2120,3,8010916281 1 5.588580 3 03 • 4 NCP Prin~rY 100.000000 0,511496 36.992536 26,118633 6,181964 0.0000DO 0,023326 10.424423 4 0l P 11 second 100.000400 0.121649 45.156813 33,814433 10,309218 01.0104566 0.000000 8.511429 0.006000 0,029453 4 kc 1.071050 21.251654 5,810981 0.818261 0,02014 5 D 5 1.1238 32.00W 20-246111 11.025519 6 ANh Sales Purchases 100.000000 1.121028 32.193384 20.366515 11,090810 1.055008 26.849459 5,845384 0.843223 01029065 0.221143 1 E2 • - Meter SR¢edin8 104.000000 7.294113 64.699282 23.449886 x1.563841 00.040114 0.056141 .430059 0.625539 0.291993 0.146611 0.492612 l.$SiS24 00.64511) 10.841669 8 01 - 066145 0.2?1810 9 02 10 C3 - /C 310 Meters 1001000000 56,0~411 64.66533 26.220D14 1.115117 0.323371 0.000000 M711 049310 53,141595 36,404160 0.487175 0.401919 0,914350 2.021177 0.146153 0.767301 11 C4 • A! 0.000010 0.000000 0,000001 0,000100 100.UOODO 0.000000 12 CS : LLt 100,000040 0.00000 0.000000 0.000000 0,000000 0.000000 0.000000 0,000004 100/010400 0,000000 5,101134 1.311ul WWI 13 C5 1C 313 city 328.461m 22-016914 11.332M ,600416 20,246692 11.025586 1.018048 21.251661 5.810916 0.838260 0.028914 14 RI - Bas E.C.A. 100.000000 1.339595 3 IS R2 PLANT 100000000 0,559031 36949288 25,648815 1.919506 0,851851 2LJ15281 6.088880 0.000000 0.026621 1.0618114 0,024295 101 IRAIS10N PLANT 102 T .000009 0.024295 103 A/C 8 361 UO Lines 100.000000 0.595221 37.487176 21,890855 8,503248 0,143521 11,686425 1069844 0j.131412 0,104515 104 A/C 36! 105 DISTRIBUTION PLAN] 100.000000 1.294939 39,225918 21,868001 11112661 0.186884 18.934105 6.289455 3,738121 0.061002 106 MRTOTAL PLANT 100.000000 0,940481 38.128901 26.642098 100.000000 0.940481 38,128901 26.642096 1,412661 0,186554 18,934109 6,289488 3,138121 0.061 -r) N 3,138121 0.37002 ak 101 OENERAL PLANT M a 109 REVENUES 36.979835 28,614055 1,255244 0.912307 20.111900 5.884114 (.242164 0,085314 u3 s 108 PLANT 100.000000 1'p8416i 100,004009 130 Deeend 4P 100,000090 0.589031 36,949288 25.648815 1,919606 0,851851 21,316281 6,588580 0,019862 0.026621 0 11,06621 subtotal PURCHASED POKER 0,881881 21.316281 5 p7 100.000000 0.5S9031 36.949288 25,648815 1.919606 ,888180 0.019862 .026621 112 PP -VARIABLE 100,000000 1.127021 32.193384 20.366515 11.690810 1.035008 26,849450 5,845361 4.817223 0029085 0,911265 23.13WO 6.341215 0.3~539 0.027414 100.000000 0.840385 34.890650 23,032214 9,490500 0,952489 24,081430 6.220436 .451995 0,021841 113 PURCHASED POWER 0 m 114 PRODUCTION 100.00060 355031 16.9ow 25-648615 1.91SE06 0,51851 21.316281 6.991) 00.040000 .0,210452 38,235165 21.6$0515 6.998986 0,109888 11.261534 6.021118 1, 115354 0.120113 115 IRARMSISSION O&M 1 116 117 CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS 100.000000 5,993994 64,716070 iiJS26Sp 3.246969 0,391.491 5,104589 2,088485 018888 0,240160 I I I I ' N++~.i 4rN'sah 'a:rMrl ;;..wc... r<....-. .«,.I.=- ~I I DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS : POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 ALLOCATION FACTORS A.F. FAc1OR TOTAL PERCENT RI Resident 92 . Resident GS - Gen(250 GS - Gen)250 GP - GS Pri, LP - Lg Pri, GI - Oovt 81d IT - Lighting T1 - ler<m Svc 118 CUSTOMER SERVICES 100.000000 7.559624 801464590 10.841660 0.145868 0.040114 0.058311 0,60535, 0.051101 0.229143 1 li9 AG Allocator 100.000000 1.941832 42.315814 23,125694 1.352631 0,150496 16,319246 5.351628 2.684105 OASIS$ 120 ADMIN. 8 GENERAL 100.000000 1.941832 42.315814 23.125694 1.352631 0.150496 16.379246 5.354628 2,684105 0195195 121 DEPRECIATION 100 000000 1.045918 38.455128 26,916111 1.349060 0.168495 14.429858 6.206732 4.149810 0.6718169 122 TAXES 100.000000 0.910481 38.128907 26,642098 7.412861 01186554 15.931709 6,289455 3,718127 0061002 123 OTHER REVENUES 100000000 5.01011 64,561192 16.114631 2.897036 0.320398 6.019821 2.139700 1.437805 0.168634 124 EXPENSES 100,000000 1.063139 37.495338 24,099280 8.388628 0,861144 20.531410 6,0940B? 1.410139 0.050000 125 RATE BASE 100.000000 0.991531 38.286113 28.115019 1.412841 0.171815 15,206415 6.249423 4,221105 0.012406 126 INTEREST 100.000000 0.940481 38.128907 26.642098 1.412661 0.186554 15,931109 61289455 3.738121 0.061002 r~ 717 N A+ C7 !D iD M 0. .A C O fD fi .p N M Solved: 08-21-1992 17:03:38 ~a Schedule 8-2.0 Page 1 of 9 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES pa POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL DENTON, TEXAS - FISCAL YEAR 1993 ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY Allocation Factor fE 1: D1 - 12 CP pa Comp: Demand: 100.000000 Customer: 0,000000 Energy: 01000000 Fuel: 0.000000 Revenue: 0.000000 Number Percent Class Name - 19.80 1.112485 R1 - Resident 544.80 30,610181 R2 - Resident 443.60 24.924149 GS - Den<250 6,50 0.365210 TG - T-O-U GS 19.90 1.118103 oP - GS Pri. 422,90 23.761097 LP - L9 Pri. 131.40 7,382852 01 - Govt Bid 0,50 0,028093 LO - Other Lt 1,80 0,101135 LT - Traffic 7,80 0,438251 LS - :treat 0,40 0.022474 DL - Decorate 0,40 0,022474 AF - Athletic 4.30 0,241600 D1 - Security 0,60 0.033712 T1 - Temp Svc 175.10 9,838184 OS - Gen>250 - ---"-1,779.80 100.000000 TOTAL Number Percent Group Name - - RESIgENTIAL 564060 31,722665 582.10 32,705922 COMMERCIAL 617 90 34.717384 INDUSTRIAL 15,40 0.854029 LIGHTING II s H t 4 1 1N i 4 , II'i{ 11 Case: umu-.i f4solved: 08-21-1992 ® 17:03:38 i Schedule 8-2,0 ' Page 2 of 9 r;x DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 r. Allocation Factor # 2: 02 - 4 CP ' Comp: Demand: 100.000000 Customer: 0.000000 Energy: 0.000000 Fuel: 01000000 Revenue: 0.000000 Class Name Number Percent R1 --Resident 4.20 0.559031 R2 Resident 277.60 36.949288 GS - pen<250 192.70 25.648875 TO - T-O-U GS 0.00 0.000000 QP - GS Pri. 6.40 0.851857 J LP - Lg Pri. 160.60 21.376281 I G1 - Govt Bld 49.50 6.588580 LO - Other Lt 0.00 0.000000 LT - Traffic 0.60 0.079862 LS - Street 0100 0.000000 DL - Decorate 0100 0.000000 AF - Athletic 0100 0.000000 D1 - Security 0.00 0.000000 T1 - Tamp Svc 0.20 0.026621 GS - Gan>250 --59.50 7.919606 _ TOTAL - - 751.30 100.000000 Group Name Number Percent RESIDENTIAL 281.80 37.508319 1u' COMMERCIAL 242.40 32.264076 INDUSTRIAL 226.50 30.147744 LIGHTING 0.60 0.079862 I Case: DMU-3 I,.gSolved: 08-21-1992 0 i7:03:38 Schedule B-2.0 Page 3 of 9 fAi DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON$ TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 r~ Allocation Factor # 3: D3 - 4 NCP Primary Comp: Demand: 100.000000 Customer: 0.000000 Energy: 0.000000 Fuel: 0.000000 Revenue: 0.000000 Class Name Number Percent R1 - Resident 4.90 0.571495 R2 - Resident 308.60 35.992536 GS - Gen<250 225.70 26.440401 TO - T-O-U GS 2.:`0 0.338232 GP - OS Pri. 7.50 0.874738 LP - Lg Pri. 178.40 20.807091 G1 - Govt Bld 58.20 6.'87964 LO - other Lt 0.00 0.000000 LT - Traffic 0100 01000000 LS - Street 0100 0.000000 DI. - Decorate 0.00 0.000000 AF - Athletic 0.00 01000000 D1 - Security 0.00 0.000000 T1 - Temp Svc 0.20 0.023326 GS - Gen>250 70.00 8.164217 TOTAL 857.40 100.000000 Group Name Number Percent RESIDENTIAL 313.50 36.564031 COMMERCIAL 288.00 33.589923 INDUSTRIAL 255.90 29.846046 LIGHTING 0.00 01000000 Case, DMU-3 I,4Solved: 08-21-1992 @ 17:03138 Schedule B-2.0 Page 4 of 9 Ia DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 1a Allocation Factor # 4: D4 - 4 NCP #1 Second Comp: Demand: 100.000000 Customer: 0.000000 Energy: 0.000000 Fuel: 0.000000 Revenue: 0.000000 Class Name Number Percent R1 - Resident 4.90 0.729710 R2 - Resident 308.60 45.956813 GS - Gen<250 226.70 33.760238 TG - T-O-U GS 2.90 0.431869 GP - GS Pri. 0.00 0.000000 LP - Lg Pri. 0.00 0.000000 G1 - Govt old 58.20 8.667163 LO - other Lt 0.00 0.000000 LT - Traffic 0.00 0.000000 LS - Street 0.00 0.000000 DL - Decorate 0.00 01000000 AF - Athletic 0.00 0.000000 D1 - Security 0.00 0.000000 T1 - Temp Svc 0.20 0.029784 GS - den>250 TOTAL 70.00 10.424423 671.50 100.000000 Group Name -Number Percent n RESIDENTIAL- - 313.50 46 686523 COMMERCIAL 288.00 42.889054 INDUSTRIAL 70.00 10.424423 1 LIGHTING 0100 0,000000 1 I b I I i Case: DMU-3 :.4Solved: 08-21-1992 0 17:03:38 ti Schedule B-2,0 Page 5 of 9 ' DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DEN TON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 Allocation Factor # 5: DS - 4 NCP #2 Second Comp: Demand: 100.000000 Customer: 0.000000 Energy: 0.000000 Fuel: 0.000000 Revenue: 01000000 Class Name Number Percent R1-- Resident -4.90 -0.721649 R2 - Resident 308.60 45.449190 GS - Gen<250 226.70 33,387334 TG - T-O-U GS 2.90 0.427099 + GP - GS Pri, 7.50 1,104566 LP - Lg Pri. 0.00 0.000000 G1 - Govt Bld 58.20 8.571429 LO - Other Lt 0.00 O.C00000 LT - Traffic 0.00 0.000000 LS - Street 0.00 0.000000 DL - Decorate 0.00 01000000 AF - Athletic 0.00 0.000000 D1 - Security 0.00 0.000000 T1 - Temp Svc 0.20 0.029455 GS - Gen>250 70.00 10.309278 - I TOTAL 679.00 100.000000 Group Name Number Percent RESIDENTIAL 313.50 46,170839 COMMERCIAL 288.00 42.415317 INDUSTRIAL 77.50 11.413844 LIGHTING 0.00 0.000000 I:a Schedule B-2.0 Page 6 of 9 s DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ANALYSIS OF MONTHLY PEAK DEMANDS (a) (h) (c) (e) M (g) Average FY88 FY69 FY90 FY41 FY92 FY88-91 FY93 DEMAND-MW October 130.0 103.8 138.8 152.7 113.5 137,3 143.9 November 10810 105.6 111.6 106.1 113.5 107.9 138,2 December 101.6 109,0 137.5 128,6 109.3 119.2 130.6 January 104.3 111.0 10217 128.3 12413 11116 12212 February @8.0 120.0 102.0 105.4 11019 706.4 11615 March 99.2 9710 114.8 108.1 105.8 104.8 114.8 April 117.0 105.0 110.6 126.4 1183 114.8 125.7 May 129.0 131.0 150.8 160.7 144.0 14219 156.9 June 159.0 164.0 11719 170.6 167.9 16410 July 164.0 167.0 17118 17811 17,.7 18812 August 16910 179.6 183.3 18010 178.0 19510 September 15910 15@.0 182.7 111.6 168.1 184'2 Total 11538.1 7,552.0 11690.7 11716.8 961.3 11624.4 11779.8 Maximum 769.0 179.6 183.3 18010 178.0 19510 Summer 651.0 669.6 721.7 70015 685.7 751.3 Winter 887.1 88214 969.0 1,016.3 938.7 11028.5 % OF MAXIMUM 73.19% 13.7@% October 76.92% 57.80% 75.72% 84.83% 60.61% 60.61% November 63.91% 58.80% 60.99% 58.94% % 66 .96% December 60.12% 60.60% 75.01% 77144% 5666..9696% 62.69% January 61.12% 61.80% 56.03% 71.28% 58,76% 99.76% February 57.99% 66,82% 55.65% 58.56% 58.87% 56.87% ll~rch 58.70% 54.01% 61.63% 60,06% April 69.23% $8.46% 60.34% '10.22% 64.48% 64.48% May 76.33% 72,94% 82.27% 89.28% 980,28% 80.28% 4.35% 94.35% June 94.08% 91.31% 91.05% P4.89% 96 49% 06 49% July 91.04% 02.98% 91.00% 98.94% 00.00% August 100.00% 100.00% t00.00% 100100% 100;4.00% 00% 104 44% September 94,08% 88.53% 99.67% 95.33% Total 910.12% 864.14% 922.37% 953.78% 912.71% 912,71% Sumer 385.21% 372.83% 393.73% 389,17% 385.28% 385,28% Minter 524.91% 491.31% 526.64% 564,61% 527.43% $27,43% r r Schedule B-2.0 ig Page 7 of 9 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES SUMMARY OF SEASONAL DEMAND ALLOCATIONS FY93 r F: (a) (b) (o) Sumner Winter Annual (4 CP) (8 OP) (12 CP) R1 Energy Sales, MWh 20198 60908 91106 Load Factor, % 58.60`1; 49.15% 51.12% Demand Sales, MW 5.1 19.3 24.4 Group Coincidence Factor, 90.00% 90.00% 90.00% Loss Factor, 1/(1-Ai Losses) 1.060 11060 11060 Demand Input, Non-Coincident, MW 4.9 18.4 23.3 System Coincidence Factor, `K 85.00% 85.00% 85.00% Demand Input Coincident, MM 4.2 15.6 19.8 R2 Energy Sales, Mh 146,910 118,051 264,951 Load Factor, % 62.05`ts 52.05`K 57.19% Demand Sales, MW 323.5 311.1 634.6 Group Coincidence Factor, % 90.013% 90.00% 90.00% Loss Factor, 1/(1-`K Losses) 1.060 1.060 1.060 Demand Input, W>n-Coincident, MM 308.6 296.8 605.4 System Coincidence Factor, % 90.0%A 90.00`K 90.00% Demand Input Coincident, MM 277.7 267.1 544.9 I GSS Energy Sales, Mh 670937 92,952 160,889 Load Factor, `K 39.06% 41.20% 40.28% Demand Sales, MM 237.6 309.5 541.1 Group Coincidence Factor, % 90,00% 90.00% 90.00% Loss Factor, 1/(1-% Losses) 1.060 1.060 1.060 Demand Input, Non-Coincident, MW 226.7 295.3 521.9 System Coincidence Factor, % 85,00% 85.00% 35.00% Demand Input Coincident, MM 192.7 251.0 443.6 GSL Energy Sales, Mh 34,168 55,443 890611 Load Factor, % 63.59% 53.37% 56.86% Demand Sales, MM 73.4 142.5 215.9 Croup Coincidence Factor, % 90.00% 90.00% 90.00% Loss Factor, 1/(1-% Losses) 11060 1.060 1.060 Demand Input, Non-Coincident, MM 70.0 135.9 206.0 System Coincidence Factcr, % 85.00% 85.00% 85.00% Demand Input Coincident, MM 59.5 115.6 175.1 TGS Energy Sales, Mh 1,020 2,647 30667 Load Factor, % 46.45% 45.39% 45.67% Demand Sales, MW 3.0 8.0 11.0 Group Coincidence Factor, % 90,00% 90.00% 90,00% Loss Factor, 1/(1-% Losses) 1..60 1.060 1.060 Demand Input, Non-Coincident, MM 2.'~ 7.6 10.5 System Coincidence Factor, % 0100% 85,00% 61.62% Durand Input Coincident, MW 0.0 6.5 6.5 i i Schedule Q-2.0 Page 8 of 9 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES SUpMARY OF SEASONAL DEMAND ALLOCATIONS (a) (b) (c) Winter Annual Slnnler (8 Ce CP) ) (12 CI P) (4 CP) ----(8 8,705 2,895 5 47.70% ap Energy Sales, MWh 49.44% 46,86% 25.0 Load Factor, % 8.0 90 00 90.00% D w.aid Sales, 90.00% 1,038 Group Coincidence Factor, % 1.038 1,038 23.4 Loss Factor, Losses) 7,5 15.9 85.00% D&))and Input, Non-Coincident, MN 85.00% 813.5 19.9 13,5 System Coincidence Factor, % 6.4 r~ Oemand Input Coincident, MN 136,849 221,538 84,689 60,17% 60.33% Lp Energy Sales, M h 60.57% 312.0 503.0 Load Factor, % 191.0 90.00% 90.00% I 1,038 Demand Sales, MN 90.00% .038 Q oup Coincidence Factor, % 1 1,038 29115 469.9 LoSs Factor, 1/(1-% Loses) 178.4 90,00K I'M Demand Input, Non-Coincident, 90100% 90.00% 422.9 System Coincidence Factor, % 160,6 262.3 Demand Input Coincident, M 47,229 17,608 29,40.67.21 1 39.94% 01 Energy Sales, MNh 39.43% 101.0 162.0 Load Factor, % 61.0 90.00% 90 Den)&nd Sales, MN 90.00`16 '0% % 6 1.060 Q oup coincidence Factor, 1.060 1,064 154,5 Loss Factor, 1/(I-% Losses) 58.2 896.4 $5,00% Derv}nd Input, Non-Coincident, 85.00% 81 81..9 9 131.4 system Coincidence Factor, % 49.5 Demand Input Coincident, 148 223 75 45.00% 45.00% LO Enor9Y Sales, "Nh 45.00% 0,5 0.7 Load Factor, % 0'2 100,00% 100.00% Demand Sales, MN 100.00%6 060 1,060 Group Coincidence Factor, % 1,060 1, 5 0.7 Loes Factor, 1/(1-% Losses) 0.2 0. 66,46% D~nand Input, Non-Coincident, M+f 0,00% 100.00% 0,5 System coincidence Factor, % 0.0 0.5 O,rnd Irr^ut coincident, VW 374 565 191 45,00% 45.00%6 LT Energy Sales, M 45,00% 1.1 1.7 Load Factor, % 0.6 100.06 100.00% Demand Sales, tv 100,00%+ ,060 1.060 G,., p coincidence Factor, % 1,060 11.2 1.8 'OU Loss Factor, 1/(1-% 1-0531139) 0,6 100,0095 Demand input ~-Coincident, M 100.00% 1001. 118 System coincidence Factor, % 0.6 1.2 Demand Input coincident, MW i Schedule 6-2.0 Page 9 of 9 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES SLVMARY OF SEASONAL DEMAND ALLOCATIONS FY93 (b) (c) (a) Winter Annual , (12 2,404 3,623 1'219 45.00% 45.00% LS Energy sales, MNh 45,00% '1.3 11.0 Load Factor, % 3,7 100.00% 100.00% r Demand Sales, MVO 100,00`K 1,060 1,060 Croup Coincidence Factor, % 1,060 7 a 11.7 Loss Factor, 1/0-96 Losses) 3.9 66,44% Non _Coincident, MN 0,00% 100.00% 7,8 Demand Input, 7,6 System coincidence Factor, % 0.0 Demand Input coincident, 129 195 66 45.00% 45.00% DL Energy sales, MNh 45.00% 0.4 0.6 Load Factor, % 0.2 100 04% 100.00% Demand Sales, VIW 100.00% ,060 1,060 Group coincidence Factor, % 1,060 1 0 4 0.6 Loss Factor, i/(1-% Losses) 0,2 ,.4 66'24% D and input, Non-Coincident, MN 0,00% 1000.4 0,4 System coincidence Factor, % 0,0 Demand Input Coincident, 132 237 105 45.00% 45.0095 AF Energy Sales, MAh 45.00% 0.4 0.7 Load Factor, % 0'3 100,00% 100.00% Demand sales, hNJ 100,00% 1,060 1.060 Group coincidence Factor, % 1,060 0.4 0.8 Loss Factor, 1/(1-% Losses) 0,3 55,77% 100.00% 0,4 µon-Coincident) 0.00% Demand Input, p,4 System coincidence Factor, % 0'0 Denand Input Coincident, MW 1,319 1,970 651 45.0095 45,00% D1 Energy Sales, MNh 45.0095 4,0 6.0 Load Factor, % 2.0 100.00% 100,00% Did Sales, MN 100.00% 1,060 1.060 Croup coincidence Factor, % 1.060 4 3 6.4 Factor, 1/(1-% Losses) 2.1 00% 67,05% Loss µon-coincident) MN 0,00% 100.00% 4.3 Demand Input, 4.3 system coincidence Factor, % 010 Demand input coincident, MN 156 235 79 41.20% 40.28% T1 Energy Sales* MNh 39,06% 0,5 0.8 Load Factor, % 0.3 900% 90,0095 0. Demand sales, hMl 90,00% 1.060 Group coincidence Factor, % 1.060 1.060 0,6 1/(I-% Losses) 0.3 0.5 85,00% Loss Factors Non-Coincident, MW '3 85.00% Deed Input, 80,00% 0.4 0,6 system coincidence Factor, % 0,2 Demand Input coincident, FkJ 452,943 812,754 359,811 11028.5 11779.8 Dw Energy Sales, Wh 751.3 Demand Input Coincident, MN 1 Case: DMU-3 17x03;38 ,iolved: 08-21-1992 @ Schedule 623.0 Page 1 of 2 I DENTON MUPOWERACOSTIPERIFUEL MODEL TEXAS DENTON, - FISCAL YEAR 1993 ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - kWh Sales " Allocation Factor # 6x E} Demand: 0.000000 COMP' 0.000000 Customer: ner9Yx 100.000000 Enel; 0,000000 Revenue: 0.040000 Number Percent Class Name - 1,120388 R1 - Resident 2694 , ,190616..0000 32.600393 R2 - Resident 160,889.00 19.795535 GS - Gen<250 3,667,00 0,451182 rG - T-O-U GS 8,705.00 1,071050 OP - OS Pri. 221,538.00 27.257694 LP _ L9 Pri. 47,229.00 5,810983 h G1 - i30vt Bld 223,00 0,027438 I LO - Other Lt 565.00 0.069517 LT - Traffic 3,623,00 0,445768 LS - street 195.00 0,023992 DL - Deccrate 237.00 0,029160 AF - Athletic 1,970.00 0,242386 DI - Security 0.028914 235.00 T1 - TemP Svc 89,611.00 11,025599 GS - Oen>250 100.000000 812,754.00 TOTAL Number percent Group Name 33,720781 274,067.00 26,086614 RESIDENTIAL 212,0'0.00 38,354343 COMMERCIAL 3191854.00 0,838261 INDUSTRIAL 6,813.00 LIGHTING a \ Case: DMU-3 -4olved: 08-21-1992 @ 17:03:38 Schedule B-3.0 Page 2 of 2 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 Allocation Factor # 7: E2 - kWh Purchases Comp: Demand: 0.000000 Customer: 0.000000 Energy: 100.000000 Fuel: 0,000000 Revenue: 0.000000 Class Name Sales Loss Purchases Percent R1 - Resident 9,106 5.72641 9,659 1.127021 R2 - Resident 2640961 5.72641 2810055 32.793384 GS - Gen<250 1600889 5.72641 170,662 19.912722 TO - T-O-U GS 3,667 5.72641 3,890 0.453853 3P - GS Pri. 8,705 3.72640 9,04?_ 11055008 LP - Ly Pri, 221,538 3.72640 230,113 26.849450 01 - Govt Bld 47,229 5.72641 50,098 5.645384 LO - Other Lt 223 5.72641 237 0.027600 LT - Traffic 565 5.72641 599 0.069928 LS - Street 3,623 5.72641 3,843 0.448407 DL - Decorate 195 5.72641 207 0.024135 AF - Athletic 237 5.72641 251 0.029333 D1 - Security 1,970 5.72641 2,090 0.243821 T1 - Temp Svc 235 5.72641 249 0.029085 OS - Ge0250 890611 5,72641 95,054 11,090870 TOTAL 812,754 5.16832 857,049 100.000000 Group Name Sales Loss Purchases Percent RESIDENTIAL 274,067 5.72641 290,714 33.920405 COMMERCIAL 212,020 5.72641 224,899 26.241044 INDUSTRIAL 319,854 4.29524 334,209 38.995328 LIGHTING 61813 5.72641 7,227 0.843223 1 1il case: DMU-3 i+,SoIved: 08-21-1992 @ 17:03:38 Schedule 6-4.0 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ?age 1 of 6 DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 11 Allocation Factor # 8: C1 - Average Cust. r; Comp: Demand: O.OG0000 Customer: 100.000000 Energy: 0.000000 Fuel: 0.000000 ( Revenue: 0.000000 Class Name Number Weight Product Percent R1 - Resident 2)073.00 1.000000 2,073.00 7.559624 r' R2 - Resident 22,065.00 1.000000 22,065.00 80,464590 GS - Gen<250 2,969.00 1,000000 2,969.00 10,827073 TO - T-O-U GS 4.00 1.000000 4.00 0.014587 GP - GS Pr i. 11.00 1.000000 11.00 0.040114 LP - Lg Pri. 16.00 1,000000 16.00 0,058347 G1 - Govt Bld 166.00 1.000000 166.00 0.605353 LO - Other Lt 0.00 01000000 0.00 0.000000 LT - Traffic 83.00 01000000 0100 0.000000 LS - Street 0.00 0.000000 0100 01000000 DL - Decorate 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.000000 AF - Athletic 15.00 11000000 15.00 0.054701 D1 - Security 55.00 0.000000 0.00 01000000 T1 - Temp Svc 63.00 1.000000 63.00 0,229743 OS - Gen>250 40.00 1.000000 40.00 0.145868 - - - TOTAL 27,560.00 0.994993 270422.00 100.000000 Group Name Number Weight Product Percent RESIDENTIAL 24,138.00 1,000000 240138.00 88.024214 COMMERCIAL 30202.00 1.000000 3,209.00 11.676756 INDUSTRIAL 67.00 1.000000 67.00 0.244320 LIGHTING 153.00 0.098039 15.00 0.054701 i h Case: DMU-3 -Solved; 08-21-1992 @ 17:03:38 Schedule 8-4,0 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Page 2 of 6 DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 Allocation Factor # 9: C2 - Meter Reading ;a Comp: Dumand: 0.000000 Customer: 100.000000 Energy: 0.000000 Fuel: 0.000000 Revenue: 0.000000 Class Name Number Weight Product Percent R1 - Resident 2,073.00 01900000 1,865.70 7.294173 R2 - Resident 22,065.00 0.750000 1'),548.75 64.699282 I OS - Gen<250 20969.00 2.000000 :,938.00 23.215308 TO - T-O-U QS 4,00 15.000000 60.00 0.234577 OP - OS Pri. 11.00 10.000000 110.00 0.430058 LP - Lg Pri. 16.00 10.000000 160.00 0.625539 G1 - Govt Bid 166.00 2.000000 332.00 1.297993 LO - Other Lt 0100 0.000000 0.00 01000000 LT - Traffic 83.00 01000000 0100' 01000000 LS - Street 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.000000 DL - Decorate 0.00 01000000 0.00 0.000000 AF - Athletic 15.00 2.500000 37.50 0.146611 D1 - Security 55.00 0.000010 0.00 0.000000 T1 - Temp Svc 63.00 2.000000 126.00 0.492612 GS - Gen>250 40.00 10.000000 400.00 1.563647 TOTAL 270560.00 0.928082 25,577.95 100.000000 - Group Name -----Number - - - - --Weight -------Product -Percent RESIDENTIAL 24,138.00 0.762882 180414.45 71.993455 COMMERCIAL 3,202.00 2,016240 61456.00 25.240490 INDUSTRIAL 67.00 10.000000 670.00 2.619444 LIGHTING 153.00 0.245098 37.50 0.146611 I 3 Case; DMU-3 17:03:38 ;,::Solved: 08-21-1992 @ Schedule B-4.0 Page 3 of 6 i_ DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC ;O ST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR }593 - A/C 369 Service Allocati~,n Factor q 10. C.3 Demand: 0,000000 Comp: 100,000000 Customer: 0,000000 Energy 0,000000 Fuel: Revenue: 0,000000 ' product Percent Number Weight class Name R1 2,073.00 6.094191 2,073.00 1,001000 22,065.00 64.866533 - Resident 22,065.00 1.000000 R2 - Resident 3,090000 8,907.00 26.184737 2,96.00 12,00 0.035278 4 GS - Oen<250 4 00 3,000010 }10,00 0.323377 TO - T-0-U GS 11,00 10.000000 0,00 0,000000 Gp - GS Pri. 16,00 0.0000ou 332.00 0.976011 LP - Lg Prl• 166.00 2,000000 0100 0.000000 a} - Govt old 0,00 0.000000 0.00 0.000000 LO - Other c 83.00 0,000000 0,00 0.000000 LT - Traffic 0,00 0.000000 0 00 0,000000 LS - Street 0,00 0,000000 22.50 0.066145 DL - Decorate 15,00 1,500000 0,00 0,000000 D1 AF - - SAtehclurieticty 55.00 0.000000 94,50 0,277810 - Temp Svc 63.00 1 10,,50000000000 10,000000 400,00 1.175917 - _ T1 40.00 - ~ GS - Geu>250 1,234253 39,()16.00 100.000000 TOTAL 27,560.00 I Weight Product percent Group Name --Number 24,138.00 70.960724 24,138.00 2,918645 9,345.50 27.47383 { 510.00 1.499294 RESIDENTIAL 3;202.00 COMMERCIAL 67 00 7,611940 22 50 0,066145 INDUSTRIAL 153.00 0.147059 LIGHTING Case; DMU-3 'Solved: 08-21-1992 @ 17;03;38 DENTON Schedule 8-4 0 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES pd4e 4 of 6 ELECTRIC TEXAS - POWER COST PER F COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL MODEL Allocation Factor YEAR 1993 # 11; C4 - A/C 370 Meters Comp; Demand; Customer; 0 000000 Energy; i00 000000 Fuel; 0.000000 Revenue: 0'000000 0,000000 Class Name Number R1 - Resident Weight Product R2 _ Resident 2,073,00 1.0000 Percent GS - Gen<250 22,065,00 00 TO - T 0-U 2,969.00 } 000000 22,073.00 5,049570 GS &,0000 ,0&5,00 ,747,595 GP - GS Pri 00 00 53 , L1 - Lg Pri 11 1,00 1 255 ,0000 00000000 i4,100,00 36.160573 G} _ Govt Bld '0 0 243588 LO - Other Lt 166,00 255,000000 }40605,,QQ00 0 401919 LT - Traffic 0100 000000 0. - LS Street 83,00 0 000000 830.00 2,021777 0,000000 0'00 974350 DL - Decorate 0100 0 000000 0.000000 0.00 AF - Athletic 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.,000000 TI - Security 15,00 4.000000 0.000000 T - T6mp Svc 55 00 Q, 600,00 .00 0.000000 I GS ` Gen>250 63.00 000000 0,146153 40,00 5,000000 0.00 01000000 I TOTAL 5.000000 315.00 0,767301 27,560,00 - --------200,00 0.487175 Group Name 1.489586 41 Number , 053 00 100,000000 RESIDENTIAL Weight Product COMMERCIAL 24,138.00 Percent INDUSTRIAL 3,102.00 1.000000 24)138, 00 LIGHTING 67,00 5,024984 58,797165 153,00 11,417910 16,090,00 39.193238 0,392157 765,00 1,863445 60.00 0,146153 f f~ T) Case: DMU-3 Solved: 08-21-1992 8 17:03:38 Schedule B-4.0 Page 4 of 6 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 Allocation Factor 0 11: C4 - A/C 370 Meters Comp: Demand: 01000000 Customer: 100.000000 Energy: 0.000000 Fuel: 0.000000 Revenue: 0.000000 Class Name Number Weight -Product - -Percent • 91 - Resident 2,073.00 1.000000 2,073.00 5.049570 R2 - Resident 22,065.00 1.000000 22,065.00 53.747595 GS - Gen<250 2,969.00 5.000000 14,845.00 36.160573 TG - T-O-U GS 4.00 25.000000 100.00 0.243588 GP - GS Pri. 11.00 15.000000 165.00 0.401919 LP - Lg Pri. 16.00 25.000000 400.00 0.974350 01 - Govt eld 166.00 5.000000 830.00 2.021777 LO - Other Lt 0.00 01000000 0100 0.000000 LT - Traffic 83.00 01000000 0.00 0.000000 LS - Street 0.00 0.000000 0100 0.000000 DL - Decorate 0.00 0.000000 0.00 0.000000 AF - Athletic 15.00 4.000000 60.00 0.146153 D1 - Security 55.00 01000000 0100 01000000 T1 - Temp Svc 63.00 5.000000 315.00 0.767301 GS - Gen>250 40.00 5.000000 200.00 0.487175 TOTAL 27,560.00 1.489586 41,053.00 100.000000 Group Name Number Weight --Product Percent 24,138.00 11000000 24,138.00 58.797165 RESIDENTIAL- COMMERCIAL 3,202.00 5.024984 16,090.00 39.193238 INDUSTRIAL 67.00 11.417910 765.00 1.863445 LIGHTING 153.00 0.392157 60.00 0.146153 r , I t 1 1 Case: DMU-3 ;,;Solved: 08-21-1992 @ 17:03x38 Schedule 8-4.0 ~15 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Page 5 of b DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 Allocation Factor # 12: C5 - A/C 371 Sec Lts 1 Comp: Demand: 01000000 Customer: 100.000000 Energy: 01000000 Fuel: 01000000 Revenue: 01000000 Class Name Number Percent R1 Resident 0.00 0,000000 R2 - Resident 0.00 0.000000 GS - Gen<250 0.00 01000000 TO - T-O-U GS 0.00 01000000 GP - GS Pri, 0.00 01000000 LP - Lg Pri. 0.00 0.000000 G1 - Govt Bld 0,00 01000000 LO - Other Lt 0.00 0.000000 LT Traffic 0100 0,000000 LS - Street 0100 0,000000 DL - Decorate 0100 0,000000 AF - Athletic 0.00 01000000 h D1 - Security 1100 100,000000 T1 - Temp Svc 0,00 01000000 GS - Gen>230 0,00 0.000000 TOTAL 1.00 100,000000 Group Name Number Percent RESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.000000 COMMERCIAL 0,00 0,000000 INDUSTRIAL 0100 01000000 LIGHTING 1.00 100.000000 -pow 1 ~.Abtl. UNU - J Solved: 08-21-1992 Q 1703x38 Schedule B-4.0 e~ DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Page 6 of 6 DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 Allocation Factor # 13: C6 - A/C 373 City Lt Cu-no: Demand: 01000000 cLstome-: 100.000000 Energy: 0 . 000000 Fuel: 01000000 Revenue: 0.000000 Class Name Number Weight Product Percent - R1 - Resident 2,073.00 0.000000 0.00 0.000000 R2 - Resident 220065.00 0.000000 0.00 0.000000 GS - Gen<250 2,969.00 01000000 0.00 01000000 TG - T-O-U GS 4.00 01000000 0100 0.000000 OP - OS Pri. 11.00 01000000 0100 0.000000 LP - Lg Pri. 16.00 0.000000 0100 0.000000 01 - Govt Bld 166.00 01000000 0100 0.000000 LO - Other Lt 0.00 1.000000 0.00 0.000000 LT - Traffic 83.00 11000000 83.00 84.693878 LS - Street 0.00 1.000000 0.00 0.000000 DL - Decorate 0.00 1.000000 0.00 0.000000 AF - Athletic 15.00 1.000000 15.00 15.306122 D1 - Security 55.00 01000000 0.00 0.000000 T1 - Temp Svc 63.00 0.000000 0.00 0.000000 GS - Gen>250 40.00 0.000000 0.00 0.000000 TOTAL 27$60.00 0.003556 98,00 100.000000 Group Name Number Weight Product Percent RESIDENTIAL 24,138.00 01000000 0.00 01000000 W., COMMERCIAL 31202.00 0.000000 0.00 01000000 INDUSTRIAL 67.00 0.000000 0.00 0.000000 LIGHTING 153.00 0.640523 98.00 100.000000 i 4 Case: DMU-3 i Solved: 08-21-1992 @ 17:03:38 Schedule 8-5.0 Page 1 of 2 DfEXAS MUPOWERACOSTIPERIFUEL MODEL 1993 DENTON, ' TEXAS F',SCAL FEAR i ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - # 14: R1 - Base Revenues 40 Allocation Factor Comp: Demand: 0.000000 Customer 0,000UOO 0,000000 Energy 0,000000 Fuel: 100,000000 II Revenue: Number Percent Class Name 1.339595 rs 546,904.00 461976 R1 - Resident 15,702,512.00 38,461976 R2 - Resident 8',932,985-00 21..800592 GS - Gen<250 80,110.00 0,+96223 TG - T-0-U GS 383,312.00 0.938890 GP - Cis Pri. 7,551,437.00 10.496607 LP _ Lg Pri. 2,412,467.00 5.905134 G1 - Govt 81d 11,462.00 0,028075 •,0 - Other Lt 29,041.00 0.071133 LT - Traffic 2941572,00 0.721529 LS - Street 1,743.00 0.004269 DL - Decorate 30,002,00 0.073487 AF - Athletic 196,452.00 0.481193 D1 - Security 260263,00 0.064329 T1 - Temp Svc 4,626,805,00 11.332968 c3S - Gen>250 - 40,826,067.00 100.000000 TOTAL Number Percent Group Hame 16,249,416.00 39.801571 RESIDENTIAL 11,451,825,00 38.,0550277 COMMERCIAL 12,561,554.00 1,379687 INDUSTRIAL 563,272.00 LIGHTING . Case: DMU-3 1JSolved: 08-21-1992 @ 17;03.38 Schedule 5-5.0 Page 2 of 2 F' DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 Allocation Factor # 15: R2 - E.C.A. Revenues to Comp: Demand: 0.000000 Customer: 01000000 Energy: 0.000000 Fuel: 0.000000 Revenues 100.000000 Class Name Number Percent R1 - Resident 154,802.00 1.120387 R2 - Resident 40504,354.00 32.600476 OS - Gen<250 2,7350113.00 19.795510 TO - T-O-U GS 62,339.00 0.451181 GP - GS Pri. 147,985.00 1.071048 LP - Lg Pri. 31766,146.00 27.257661 G1 - Govt 81d 8020893.00 5.810976 LO - Other Lt 3,791.00 0.027438 LT - Traffic 9,605.00 0.069517 LS - Street 61,591.00 0.445768 DL - Decorate 30315.00 0.023992 AF - Athletic 4,029.00 0.029160 01 - Security 33,490.00 0.242385 T1 - Temp Svc; 3,995.00 0.028914 GS - Gen>250 1,523,387.00 11.025586 TOTAL - --13,816,835.00 100.000000 Group Name Number Percent RESIDENTIAL 40659,156.00 33.720663 COMMERCIAL 30604,340.00 26.086582 INDUSTRIAL 5,437,518.00 39.354295 LIGHTING 115,821.00 0.838260 +a Case; OMU-:3 ;;Solved: 08-21-1992 ~ 17;03:38 Schedule B-6,0 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITI[S Page 1 of 4 DENTON, 'T'EXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL 'YEAR 1993 Cost of Service commands Num Command Account Amount AFk - 1 MAJOR PLANT 2 MINOR PRODUCTION PLANT 3 310 Land & Rights 65,115 2 4 311 Structures 4,342,770 2 5 312 Boiler Plant 10,050,033 2 6 314 Turbo Generators 8,861,317 2 7 315 Acessory Equip, 20522,000 2 8 316 Miscellaneous 300,694 2 9 333 Water Generators 3,035,904 2 1 10 345 Misc. Power Pint 807,144 2 11 346 Misc, Steam Pint 179,443 2 12 END MINOR 101 13 MINOR TRANSMISION PLANT 14 350 Land & Rights 4,390 2 15 351 Right of Way 1410423 2 16 353 Station Equip, 3,461,835 2 17 355 Poles & Fixtures 307,944 2 18 356 OH Conductors 354,414 2 19 END MINOR 102 20 MINOR DISTRIBUTION PLANT 21 360 Land & Rights 1230399 3 22 361 Structures 732 3 23 362 Station Equip 51363,331 3 24 364 Poles Primary 3,567,098 3 2.5 364 Poles Secondary 6290488 4 26 365 OH Conductor Pr 4,427,702 3 27 365 OH Conductor Seu 781,359 4 28 SUM 4 A/C 364/365 OH Lines 103 29 366 UG Conduit Pri 2,645,430 3 30 366 UG Conduit Sec 466,841 4 31 367 UG Conductor Pri 31092,462 3 32 367 UG Conductor Sec 545,729 4 33 SUM 4 A/C 366/367 UG Lines 104 34 368 Line Transfrmrs 7,291,919 5 35 369 Services 2,184,943 10 36 370 Meters 30298,790 11 37 371 Install Cust Pre 367,730 12 38 3',3 St Lights 21270,981 13 39 END MINOR 105 40 SUBTOTAL MAJOR 106 41 MINOR GENERAL PLANT 42 389 Land & Rights 165,039 106 43 390 Structure 206190416 106 44 391 Office Supplies 423,822 106 45 392 Transportation 30055 106 46 393 Stores Equip 25,098 106 47 394 Tools & Shop Eq, 813,879 106 48 395 Laboratory Equip 137,397 106 49 396 Power Op Equip 250 106 50 397 Communications 8$0,084 106 7 Schedule B-6,0 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Page 2 of 4 DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 Cost of Service Commands Mum Command Account Amount -AF# 51 398 Misc Equip ------291,110 106 52 399 Unrealized Incr, -320,955 106 53 END MINOR 54 END MAJOR 107 55 MAJOR REVENUES 108 56 Base Revenues 40,826,067 14 57 E,C,A, Revenues 13,816,835 15 58 END MAJOR 59 MAJOR EXPENSES 109 60 MINOR PURCHASED POWER 61 TMPA Facilities Chg. 29,967,230 2 62 TMPA Coverage Return -6,101,870 2 63 SUM 2 Demand PR 64 TMPA Dispatching 110 65 TMPA Capacity Sales 29,590 2. 66 SUBTOTAL MINOR PP-CAPACITY -2,344,650 2 67 TMPA OC Fuel 111 gg 8,011,830 7 TMPA Purchases 662,230 7 69 TMPA Econ. Dispatch 3,8250590 7 70 TMPA Energy Sales -2,266,400 7 71 SUM 4 PP-VARIABLE 112 72 END MINOR 73 MINOR PRODUCTION 0&M 113 74 City Fuel Cost 2,972,310 7 75 Production 0&M 76 END MINOR 3,028,081 2 77 MINOR TRANMSISSION 0&M 114 79 Engineering 280534 2 89 Substations 287,798 2 Overhead Lines 140,945 2 81 END MINOR 82 MINOR DISTRIBUTION 0&M 115 83 Engineering 247,634 105 84 Substations 219,279 3 85 Overhead Lines 1,1071424 103 86 Underground Lines 463,105 104 87 Line Transformers 454,700 5 88 Meters 396,108 11 89 Security Lights 730068 12 90 Street Lights 155,903 13 91 Miscellaneous 759,008 105 92 END MINOR 93 MINOR CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS 116 94 Records & Collection 462,540 8 95 Meter Reading 384 861 9 96 Uncollectible Accts. 2000000 109 97 END MINOR 98 MINOR CUSTOMER SERVICES 117 99 Customer Services 604,860 8 100 Customer information 3900025 8 -V Schedule 6-6.0 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Page 3 of 4 DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 Cost of Service Commands Num Command Account Amount AF# 101 END MINOR 118 102 SUM MINOR 5 A&G Allocator 119 103 MINOR ADMIN. & GENERAL 104 Salaries 416,757 119 105 Office Supplies 29,602 119 106 Injuries & Damages 957 119 107 Employee Benefits 83,139 119 108 Miscellaneous 429,359 119 109 Maintenance 917,227 119 110 END MINOR 120 111 MINOR DEPRECIATION 112 Production 768,014 101 I 113 Transmission 192,123 102 114 Distribution 2,0050004 105 115 General 299,859 108 116 END MINOR 121 117 MINOR TAXES 118 Transfer to City 2,2940000 IDS 119 END MINOR 122 120 MINOR OTHER REVENUES 121 Service Center Rents -1900000 108 122 Miscellaneous Rev. -316,000 8 123 END MINOR 123 124 END MAJOR 124 125 MAJOR RATE BASE 126 Plant in Service 108 127 Accum Depr - Prod -18,722,892 101 128 Accum Depr - Trans -2,984,847 101 129 Accum Depr - Distr -1803950587 105 130 Accum Depr - Lien -1,916,937 107 131 END MAJOR 125 132 MAJOR INTEREST 133 Bond Interest 2,029,000 108 134 END MAJOR 126 \Lt•1 n Case: DMU-3 "Solved: 08-21-1992 @ 17:03:38 Schedule B-6,0 Page 4 of 4 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 Derivation of Groups Group A: RESIDENTIAL Group B: COMMERCIAL Group C: INDUSTRIAL Group D: LIGHTING Class Name A 8 C D R1 -Resident X - R2 - Resident X GS - Gen<250 X TG - T-O-U GS X GP - GS Pri, X LP - Lg Pri. X G1 - Govt Bid X LO - Other Lt X LT - Traffic x LS - Street x DL - Decorate X AF - Athletic x D1 - Security X T1 - Temp Svc X GS - Gen>250 X i ww, y ..K.. MWWA t s Solved: 08-21-1992 @ 17:03:38 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 COST OF SERVICE ALLOCATION RATE BASE ACCOUNTS TOTAL DOLLARS A,F, RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING Plant in Service 760500,615 108 29,888,327 25,244,097 18,508,501 2,859,690 Acum Depr - Prod -18,722,892 101 -7,0220642 -6,040,768 -5,644,530 -14,952 Accun Depr - Trans --21984,847 101 -1,119,566 -963,033 -899,864 -21384 Accun Depr - Distr -18,395,587 105 -7,4530884 -6,195,824 -3,432,910 -1,312,969 Accun Depr - Gen -1,916,937 107 -748,936 -632,561 -463,782 -71,658 TOTAL RATE BASE 34,480,352 125* 130543,300 11,411,910 8,067,415 1,457,728 39,276% 33,097% 23.397% 4.228% ~ v v, a ~ (d S !D N CL rc J O m n N I H O ::SLL:zeF~ 1 Solved; 08-21-1992 ~ 17:03:38 ~-a*1 { DEMON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES 1 DENFON, TEXAS - POWER COST PER FUEL "EL IIECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 COST OF SERVICE ALLOCATIOR - RATE BASE AM-01S TOTAL DOLLARS AJ. R1 - Resident R2 - Resident IS - 6en(25D IS • Gen)250 GP - IS Pri. LP . L9 Pri. GI . Govt Bld 1.1 _ Lighting TI - Temp Svc Plant in service 16,500,615 108 119,418 29,168,849 20,381,369 5,116,632 601,119 12,190,15[ 4,811,41k 2,859,690 31,251 AmA Depr • Prod -18,122,892 101 •104,661 -6,911,915 •4,802,211 -1,462,119 •159,492 •4,002,258 -1,233,513 14,952 1,984 Acca Depr - Trans •2,984,841 101 -16,686 -1,102,680 -165,580 •236,388 -25,421 •638,049 -196,659 2,384 195 Accw Depr - Oistr -18,395,581 105 -238,212 -1,215,612 -5,010,145 -1,298,242 •133,529 -2,001,[39 -1,105,852 -1,3125969 19,228 Acco Depr - Gen 1,916,931 101 -18,029 •130,901 -510,112 -143,246 .15,018 •305,458 •120,565 11,CS8 },28 TOTAL RATE BASE 34,460,352 1250 341,865 13,201,414 9,232,121 2,555,916 266,193 5,243,246 2,154,823 1,451,128 24,966 0.9921 39.281% 26.115% 1,413% 0,118x 15.206% 6.249% 4,2286 0,012% '0 N o t ~ fD d n+ c O m N I~ d f 'I Solved; 08-21-1992 d 17;03;38 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES \ DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY BFISCAL YEAR 1993 COMPONENTS OF RATE %000UNTS TOTAL DOLLARS A.F. RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING DEMAND COMPONENT 11,353 D3 D2 - 4 4 CP NCF Primary 14,215,658 2 5,332,054 4,586,551 4,285,700 O - 4 10,510,314 3 3,842,995 3,530,406 3,136,913 0 D4 - 4 NCP #1 Second 1,3250217 4 618,698 568,373 138,146 DS - 4 NCP #2 Second 3,987,500 5 1,841,062 1,691$11 - 455,12 0 TOTAL - -'-11,353 DEMAND COMPONENT 300038,689 11,6340809 10,376,641 8,015,887 38,73396 34.544% 26,68596 0.03891 CUSTOMER COMPONENT 790 C3 --A/C-369 Service 1,194,810 10 847,846 328707,,2.60 009 1733,9,6114 5 2,636 1,803,904 11 1,0600645 0 0 201,089 C4 - A/C 370 Meters 0 p 1,241,859 C5 - A/C 371 Sec Lts 201,089 12 0 0 C6 - A/C 373 City Lt 1,241,859 13 TOTAL - 1,908,491 1,035,269 51,528 114460375 CUSTOMER COMPONENT 4,441,663 23.308% 1,1609K 32.564% TOTAL -34,480,352 - 13,543,300 11,411,910 ----800670415 - 1,45422896 RATE BASE 39.278% 33.091% 23,397% b N w n to m a rc J 0 m n 1 N N i O I wnx~ 1 I CaS'~'""'MU-3 Solved: 06-21.1992 113:0318 0E00N MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, IE2.AS : POWER COST PER FUEL OIL ELECIRIC COST OF SERVICE SPJDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 COMPONENTS OF RATE BASE ACCOUNTS TOTAL COLLARS A.F. R1 - Resident R2 Resident OS - Gen(250 GS . Gen)25O GP - GS Pri. LP - 1.9 Pri, 01 - Govt Bid Ll - lighting TI • lemq Svc DEMAND COMPONENT 02 - 4 CP 14,215,658 2 19,410 5,252,585 3,946,156 1,125,824 121,097 3,038,119 936,610 11,353 3,184 D3 - 4 0 Primary 10,SIO,314 3 60,066 3,182,929 2; 14,518 858,085 91,938 2,186,891 113,436 0 2,452 04 - 4 NCP 11 Second 1,325,217 4 9,610 609,021 453,170 138,146 0 0 114,859 0 395 D5 - 4 0 02 Second 3,987,500 5 28,176 1,812,286 1,348,350 411,082 44,045 0 341,186 0 1,115 TOTAL 1... DEIUNDCOMPONENT 30,038,689 111,982 11,456,827 8,262,145 2,533,138 257,019 5,225,610 2,106,691 I'm 1,805 0.593% 38.140% 27.505% 8.433% 0.856% 17,396% 1,013% 0.038% 0.026% CUSIOMER COMPONENT 0 • A/C 369 Service 1,194,810 10 72,814 115,032 313,279 14,050 3,864 0 11,661 190 3,319 C4 - A/C 370 Meters 1,803,904 11 91,069 969,555 656,696 8,188 1,250 11,516 36,471 2,636 13,841 C5 - A/C 311 Sec Lis 201,089 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 201,089 0 C6 • A/C 313 City Lt 1,241,859 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,24!,859 0 TOTAL CUSTOMER COMPONENT 4,441,663 163,903 1,744,581 969,916 22,838 11,114 11,516 48,132 1,446,315 11,161 3.690% 39.218% 21,8381 0.514% 0,250% 0.396% I,OBd% 32.564% 0.383 TOTAL RAIE BASE 34,480,352 341,885 13,201,414 9,232,121 2,555,976 266,193 5,243,246 2,154,823 11451,128 ?4,966 0.992% 38.281% 26.115% 1.413% 0.118% 15.206% 6.249k 4,228% 0.012k •0 VI L0) = rD M ra. N C O (D -fi C-> N I N CJ I 1 Case: DPu-3 Solved: 08-21-1992 Q 17:03:38 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 COST OF SERVICE ALLOCATION - PLANT AOCOUNTS TOTAL DOI-LARS A.F. RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL ---INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING PRODUCTION PLANT 310 Land & Rights 650115 2 24,424 210009 19,631 52 311 Structures 4,342,770 2 1,628,900 1,401,155 1,309,247 31468 312 Boiler Plant 10,050,033 2 3,7690598 3,242,550 3,029,858 8,026 314 Turbo Generators 80861,317 2 3,323,731 20859,022 2,671,487 7,077 315 Acessory Equip. 2,522,000 2 945,960 813,700 760,326 2,014 316 Miscellaneous 300,694 2 112,785 97,016 90,652 240 333 Water Generators 30035,904 2 1,138,717 979,506 915,257 2,425 345 Misc. Power Plnt 807,144 2 302,746 260,418 243,336 645 346 Misc. Steam Plnt 179,443 2 67,306 --57,896 54,098 ----------143 Total PRODUCTION PLANT -30,164,420 101* JV=11,3140167 ====9,732,271 9,093,892 24,090 37.508% 32.264% 30.148% 01080% TRANSMISION PLANT ---Rights 4,390 2 10647 1,416 1,323 4 350 Land & 351 Right of Way 141,423 2 53,045 45,629 42,636 113 353 Station Equip. 3,461,835 2 1,298,476 1,116,929 1,043,665 2,765 + 355 Poles & Fixtures 307,944 2 115,505 99,355 92,838 246 356 OH Conductors 354,474 2 132,957 - -_--114,368 106,866 283 1 Total w - TRANSMISION PLANT - 41270,066 102* 10601,630 1,377,697 1,287,329 3,410 v ti 37.508% 32.264% 30. 1,48% 0.080`K to S M rD DISTRIBUTION PLANT , 123)399 3 45,120 41,450 36,830 0 ° fD 360 Land & Rights 268 246 218 0 rn o 361 Structures 732 3 362 Station Equip 5,363,331 3 1,961,050 1;801,539 1,600,742 0 ; 0 'r DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 COST OF SERVICE ALLOCATION - PLANT ACCOUNTS TOTAL DOLLARS A.F. RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL LIWTINQ 364 Poles Primary 3,567,098 3 1,304,275 1,198,185 1,064,638 0 364 Poles Secondary 629,488 4 293,886 269,981 65,620 0 365 OH Conductor Fr 40427,702 3 1,618,946 1,487,262 10321,494 0 365 CH Conductor Sec 781,359 4 364,789 335,117 81,452 0 Subtotal A/C 364/365 OH Lin 9,405,647 103* 3,581,897 3,2900546 2,533,204 0 38.082% 34.985% 26.933% 0,000% 366 UO Conduit PH 2,645,43U 3 967,276 888,598 789,556 0 ;166 UO Conduit Sec 466,841 4 217,952 200,224 48,665 0 367 UO Conductor Pri 310920462 3 1,130,729 1,038,756 922,978 0 367 UQ Conductor Sec 545,729 4 254,782 234,058 56,889 0 Subtotal A/C 366/367 UG Lin 6,7500462 104* 20570,738 2,361,635 1,818,088 0 38,082% 34,985`K 26,933`k 0.000% 368 Line Transfrmrs 7,291,919 5 3,366,740 3,092,891 832,288 0 369 Services 21184,943 10 1,5500451 600,288 32,759 1,445 370 Meters 3,296,790 11 1,939,595 10292,903 610471 4,821 371 Install Cust Pre 3670730 12 0 0 0 367,730 373 St Lights 2,2700981 13 0 0 0 20270,981 Total DISTRIBUTION PLANT - 37,057,934 105* 15,015,859 120481,496 6,915,601 2,644,978 40,520% 33,661% 18,662% 7.137% a n ry CD SUBTOTAL n~c PLANT 71,492,420 106* 27,931,656 23$91,465 17,296,822 2,6720477 C,j 39,069% 32,999`% 24,194% 3.738% C3 o, i DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON) TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 OOST OF SERVICE ALLOCATION - PLANT ACOOUNTS TOTAL DOLLARS A.F. RESIDENTIAL C011MERCiAL GENERAL PLANT INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING - - 389 390 Land & Rights Structure 165'039 106 64,480 391 Office supplies 2)619,416 106 1,023,390 54,460 39,740 39?. Transportation 423,822 106 864,55 6,169 3,055 106 165,585 139,855 633,740 97,917 393 Stores Equip 1,194 102,739 15,849 394 Tools & Shop Eq. 25,098 106 9,806 1'008 739 395 Laboratory Equip 813,679 106 317,978 8,268 6,072 114 396 Power Op Equip 137,397 106 53,68o 268,568 196,909 938 397 Ccrmnrnications 250 106 98 45,339 33,242 30,136 398 Misc Equip 850,084 106 332,123 82 60 5,136 399 Unrealized Incr, 291,110 106 113,735 280,515 205,669 9 Total --320,955 106 -125,395 96,062 70,431 31,777 GENERAL PLANT -1050911 -77,652 10,982 5,008,195 107# r`____ -11,993 1,96,671 1,652,632 - 1 1),221111, ,679 39.069% 32.999% 187 24.194% , 70TAL 3,738% PLANT - 76,500,615 108* 29,888 .327 - 25,2440097 ==_18 508 501 = - ,859 39.069% 32 9991K 2,859,690 24.194fk 3.738SK ~ n fD f0 W C v O fD b Ol I H O A 1 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 COST OF SERVICE ALLOCATION - PLANT ACCOUNTS TOTAL DOLLARS A.F. RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL -LIGHTING GENERAL PLANT 389 Land Rights 165,039 106 64,480 54,460 39,929 6,169 390 Structure 20619,416 106 1,023,390 864,369 633,740 97,917 391 Office Supplies 423,822 106 165,585 139,855 102,539 15,843 392 Transportation 3,055 106 10194 1,008 739 114 393 Stores Equip 25,098 106 9,806 8,282 6,072 938 394 Tools & Shop Eq. 813,879 106 317,978 268,568 196,909 30,424 395 Laboratory Equip 137,397 106 53,680 45,339 33,242 5,136 396 Power Op Equip 250 106 98 82 60 9 397 Ccrmanications 850,034 106 332,123 280,515 205,669 31,777 398 Misc Equip 291,110 106 113,735 96,062 70,431 10,882 1 399 Unrealized Incr. -320,955 106 -125,395 -1050911 - ---77,652 _11,998 Total GENERAL PLANT 5,008,195 107* 10956,671 ====11652,632 - - 1,211,679 - - 187,213 39.069% 32,999% 24,194% 3.738% TOTAL PLANT 76,500,615 108* 290888,327 25,244,097 18,508,501 - 2,859,690 39,069% 32.999% 24,194'% 3.738% I sw n N N CL W C ~m fi rn i 0 I Case; Dm0 3 Solved; 08-21.1492 ! 11;03:38 DENTON MRICIPAt UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS : POWER COST PER FUEL MOOEL ELECIRIC COST % SfRYICE STUDY • FISCAL YEAR 1993 WST CF SERVICE ALLOCATVON • PLANE ACCO(INTS TOTAL DOLLARS A.F. RI - Resident R2 - Resident GS Gen(2S0 GS G¢n)250 GP GS Pr" lP l9 Fri. 01 Govt Bid LT Lighting 71 Svc PRODUCTION PLANT 27 65,115 2 364 24,060 16,701 5,157 555 92823,919 4,299 S2 310 Rights 4,342,110 2 24,211 1,604,623 1,113,812 341,430 36,994 ,323 "6,121 9,026 311 Structures ,466 1,156 10,050,033 2 56,183 3,1i3,416 2,517,120 195,923 85,612 2,148,323 58833 8 7 Oil 2,359 312 Boiler Plant ts 49,538 3,214,194 20212,828 701,181 75,486 1,894,270 5,164 2,014 611 314 Turbo Oenerators 8,861,311 2 646,865 199,132 21,464 539,110 166,164 80 315 Acessory Equip, 20522,000 2 l4,011 931 11,125 23,814 2,561 64,271 19,811 240 316 miscellaneous 300,694 2 1681 111,,861104 3,033,904 2 16,912 1,121,145 118,615 240,132 25,862 648,963 200,073 2 8 345 misc. Potter Pint 807,144 2 4,512 298,234 261,023 63,923 6,816 38112,,3531 58 53,119 143 218 333 Meter Generators 211 1,529 11,823 143 48 346 misc, stem Pint 119,443 2 1,003 66,303 46,025 .:..:ccly Total PRODUCTION PLANT 361164,420 1014 160.,628 ,538 5541 1 X36 949% 1125.649% 2 381.420% 250.852% 6421,316% 3 986.585% 20,080% 0,021% I TRANSMISION PLANT 4 1 I,622 1,126 348 31 S38 289 38 350 land b Rights 4,390 2 25 113 141,423 2 191 8'1,255 36,213 Vi,200 1,205 30,231 9,318 922 351 Right of Iaq 246 82 353 station Equip, 3,461,835 2 19,353 1,239,123 881,922 214,164 29,64SO 23 1401812 228,986 2,765 2, Oi3 283 94 355 Poles I Pictures 301,444 2 1,122 113,183 18,484 24388 3,020 15,133 23,353 1,982 130,916 s0, 919 28, 356 Om Conductors 354,414 2 1,131 ov Total ii,51i,159 1,095,224 338,112 36,315 912,181 281,331 0.080% 0.0211 m (D TRANS8ISION PLANT 4,210,066 1024 234 81,871 1 136,949% 25,649% 1.920% 0.852% 21.316% 6.589% ,n 7 CL .a c J DiS1RIBUTION PLANT 0 49 0 fD 10,015 1,619 25,616 8,326 0 -n 360 land b Rights 123,399 3 703 44,414 33,045 6 152 S0 0 132 3 4 263 196 60 3 061 0 1,251 361 Structures 362 Station Equip 8,363,331 1 30,651 1,930,399 1,436,221 431,814 46,915 1,115,953 64 , r I I ✓ A V \NI DFNION MUNICIPAL U1ILITIES 1 DENfON, fE%AS : POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST Of SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 COST OF SERVICE ALLOCATION • PLANT i ACCOUNTS TOTAL DOLLARS A.F. R1 Resident R2 - Resident GS - Genc250 GS - Gen)45O GP OS Pri. LP • Lg Pri, 01 • 63vt Old LT - Lighting fl letup Svc 364 Poles Primry 3,561,098 3 20,386 1,283,889 955,220 291,226 31,203 142,209 242,133 0 832 364 Poles Secondary 629,488 4 4,593 269,293 215,235 65,620 0 0 54,539 0 181 365 ON Conductor Pr 4,421,102 3 25,304 1,593,642 1,185,618 361,481 18,131 921,210 300,551 0 1,033 365 qM Conductor Sec 781,359 4 5,702 359,086 267,163 81,452 0 0 61,122 0 233 Subtotal 0595% 3,525,112 2,623,296 21.89% 148903% 69,934 1,663,485 A/C 3641365 OM Lin 9,405,647 1034 $ 6610161 O,OO3 0024% 366 UG Conduit Pri 2,645,430 3 15,119 952,151 706,410 215,919 23,141 550,431 119,511 0 611 366 UO Conduit Sec 466,641 4 3,407 214,545 159,623 48,665 0 0 40,462 0 134 367 UOConductor Pri 3,092,462 3 17,613 1,113,055 828,119 252,415 27,051 643,451 209,915 0 121 367 UG Conductor Sec 545,129 4 3,982 250,800 186,596 56,889 0 0 41,299 0 163 Subtotal . A/C 3601361 JO Lin 6,750,402 1041 `0.595% 2 531 d61% 1821896% 578503% 50144% 1 117686% 411010% O,OOOk 0024% 368 Line Transfrws 1,291,919 5 52,622 3,314,118 2,465,121 151,144 80,544 0 6250022 0 2,148 369 Services 2,164,943 10 133,155 1,411,291 512,892 25,693 7,066 4 21,325 1,445 6,010 310 Meters 3,298,190 11 166,575 1,713,020 1,200,891 16,011 13,258 32,142 66,694 4,821 25,312 371 Install Cust Pre 367,130 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 361,730 0 313 St Lights 2,270,901 13 0 0 0 0 2,210,981 ............0 Total _ DISIRIBU114N PLANT 31,051,934 1054 475,818 14,535,581 10,221565% 2,631,081% 260126% 4 010,818% 2,221,140 011% 2 641.931% 30105% _U n a t0 N~ SUBTOTAL PLANT 11,492,420 1064 612,371 27,259,279 19,041,080 5,342,386 562,321 11,392,109 4,496,463 2,612,471 41,901 o 0.940% 36129% 26,642% 1.413% 0.181% 15.935% 6,289,, 3.138% 0.0611 0 I i r l~ I -~4 goo" DENTON 74JNICIPAL UTILITIES ` DENTON, TEXAS : POWER COST PER FUEL NOOEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 OOST OF SERVICE ALLOCATION - PLANT A=NTS TOTAL DOLLARS LF. RI - Resident R2 : Resident GS - 6en1250 OS - Gen>250 OP _ GS Pri. LP - E q 61 - Gort Bld L1 Lighting T1 - TV0 Svc ......9 OENERAt PLANT 389 land b Rights 165,039 106 1,552 62,928 43,910 12,333 1,298 26,298 10,380 6,169 Ilt 390 Structure 2,619,416 106 24,635 998,755 691,867 195,70 20,603 {11,396 161,141 91,911 1,155 391 office Supplies 423,822 106 3,986 161,599 112,915 31,671 3,334 67,535 26,656 5,843 284 392 Transportation 3,055 106 29 1,165 814 228 21 481 192 114 2 393 Stores Equip 25,098 106 236 9,570 6,687 1,615 191 3,999 1,519 938 11 394 Tools 6 Shop Eq. 813,819 106 7,654 3100323 216,834 60,818 6,402 129,689 51,189 30,421 545 395 Laboratory Equip 137,391 106 1,292 52,386 36,605 10,261 1,081 21,894 8,64''1 5,136 92 396 Power OP Equip 250 106 2 95 67 19 2 40 16 g 0 391 comnications 850,084 106 7,995 324,328 226,480 63,524 6,686 135,458 53,466 31,717 570 398 Nisc Equip 291,110 106 2,138 110,997 77,558 21,154 2,290 46,388 18,309 10,882 195 399 Unrealized Incr, -3?0,955 106 -3,019 -122,317 -85,509 -23,984 •2,524 •51,143 •20,186 11,998 215 Total 245 ,1)2 8,041 ,188 ,211 3,356 OERERAL PLANT 5,008,155 107, 41,101% 1,538,129% 1 326,642% 311413% 30183 14S,93S% 316x289% 183138% 0063 TOTAL ,,151 ,1,471 ,,6SO ,251 PLANT 16,500,615 1084 119,478 2B 1,829% 20 3 26,642% 5,116,632 6433% fi0001 38 1% 12 115935% 4 816289% 2 853738% 50061% ro to sv n m (DD CL cs c y J m N ~ I I I a. I y Ca<^ 1992 17:03;38 Solved; 08-21- DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POIIER COST PER FUEL ~RL1993 ELECTRIC COST COMPONENTS STUDY PLANT LIGHTING RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TOTAL DOLLARS A.F. ACCOUNTS 29,42 DEMAND COMPONENT r 11,108,447 0 13,820,576 11,886,245 6,138,307 0 ------_-r 36,846,694 2 7 519,966 6,908,294 270,324 0 02 - 4 CP 20,5660566 3 1,112309,191 0 Q3 - 4 NCP Primary 2,802593,182733 4 5 3 3, 1,210,667 890,592 4 NCP #1 ,602,587 ,554 Second p4 D5 - 4 NCP #2 Second 70 , 26,153, 796 23,218,285 18,407,674 29,426 0,043% TOTAL 67,809,177 34.241`% 27,146% DEMAND COMPONENT 38.57096 CUSTOMER OOMPONENT 35,054 1,546 10 1,659,064 642,339 650777 5,159 2,338,003 ,075,468 1,383,473 393,490 C3-- A/C 369 Service 3,529,877 11 2 0 0 0 2,430,068 C4 _ A/C 370 Meters 393,490 1123 0 0 C5 - A/C 371 Sec Lts J_--- C6 - A/C 373 City Lt 2,430,068 0 _ 100,831 2,8301264 TOTAL 3,7340531 2,025,812 S,i60% 32,564`K CUSTOMER COMPONENT 8,691,438 42.96 2.3,308% 25,244,097 --'18,508,501 - 20859,690 TOTAL - - 29,888,327 24,194% 3,738A6 76,500,615 39,069`% 32.999A; PLANT o n ~m a ,a c J ~y 11 N N C:3 i I r Cass, ~'.,u-3 Rolved; 08.21-1992! 11;03;38 OENION MUNICIPAL UTILITIES OENTON, DAS : POKER COST PER FUEL M00£L ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY • FISCAL YEAR 1993 CCMPONENTS OF PLANT ACCOUNTS T014L DOLLARS A.F. R1 - Resident R2 - Resident GS • Gen050 GS GeO29 GP - GS Pri. LP . 19 Pr I. GI - Govt Bid LT lighting 11 - Terq Svc DEMAND COMPONENT D2 • 4 CP 36,846,694 2 205,984 13,64,591 9,450,163 2,918,113 313,881 7,816,453 2,421,674 29,426 9,80S D3 • 4 NC? Priury 20,566,566 3 117,531 1,402,429 5,501,445 1,619,099 119,903 4,219,304 1,396,051 0 4,112 04 - 4 NCP 11 Second 2,593,182 4 18,923 1,191,144 886,664 270,324 0 0 224,755 0 05 - 4 0 12 Second 1,802,133 5 $6,306 3,546,219 2,638,450 804,405 86,186 0 668,806 0 2,298 TOTAL . 365% 510.855% 12,15511,7571M 1'1161,1286151% 20,043% 17,671 DEM4ND COMPONENT 61,809,111 318,752 25,755,943 21.258% 5,611,942 31982% 18,01,322 CUSTOMER COMPONENT 03 - A/C 369 Service 2,338,003 10 142,482 1,516,581 613,025 27,493 1,561 0 22,819 1,% 6,495 C4 - A/C 310 Meters 3,529,817 li 178,244 1,891,224 1,285,022 17,191 14,1810 34,3930 71,366 9935,159 ,490 27,0805 05 - A/C 371 Sec Lts 393,490 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,430,068 0 C6 - A/C 313 City Lt 2,430,068 13 0 0 TOTAL - . CUSTOMER COMPONENT 8,691,438 32 3 492181 I 'm.041 4 0514% 2 0.250% 14,313 91084% 2,830,261 30 3.690% 3 360% TOTAL PLANT 16,500,615 116910% 29,18,849 20,381,36S 5,116,632 co'liq 12,19015,151135% 4,811,471 2,8539,610138% $0061% -0 L11 w n (0 =r tD N r_ 0 M 0 N I O I .•-...-•I ..:x a. Ive.+n\ 1--...Mey ..a e.K.l I...ii.Jal I.uz\...:\ tMM/1 I I Solved: 08-21-1992@ 17:03:1A DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 + COST OF SERVICE ALLOCATION - REVENUES I ACCOUNTS TOTAL DOLLARS AIFI RESIDENTIAL CCM'IERCIAL INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING Base Revenues 40,826,067 14 16,249,416 11,4510825 120561,554 563,272 E.CIAI Revenues 130816,835 15 4,659,156 3,604,340 5,437,518 115,821 TOTAL REVENUES 54,6420902 109* 200908,572 15,056,165 17,999,072 679,093 38.264% 27,554% 32.939% 1.243% 'U N m= m In D M CL 1~ c o fU -n M N F-. O ssst r ;.L-w... KLtt..... .....tea awe k8.q w Solved; 08.21.1992 ! 11:03;36 *Amu I DEMON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS - POMER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 COST OF SERVICE ALLOCATION - REVENUES ACCOUNTS TOTAL DOILAAS A.F. R1 - Resident A2 Resident as - Gen(250 OS - Gen)250 GP - GS Pri. LP tg Pri, GI - Govt BId .1.-.Lighting Svc ase Revenues 46,626,067 14 546,904 15,102,SE2 9,013,095 4,626,805 383,312 1,551,437 2,412,461 563,212 26 263 E.C.A. Revenues q,8E6,83S 15 154,802 4,504,351 2,191,452 1,523,381 147,985 3,186,146 802,693 115,821 3,995 TOTAL REVENUES ~I•S(2,902 1090 701,106 20,106,866 11,810,547 6,150,192 531,297 11,311,583 3,215,360 619,093 30,258 1,284% 36,980% 21.614% 71.255% 0.9124 20.112% 5,881% 1,243% 0.055% w ~ In ra a N C O m M N I `~,..ls•. C7 I T a MOM as Cato - U N Solved: 08-21-1992 @ 1703x38 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON) TEXAS = Pt5R COST PER FUEL MODEL1gg3 ELECTRCOST~ OF S RVICEIALLOCATION - EXPENSES INDUSTRIAL L I GIRT I NO RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL TOTAL DOLLARS A.F. AO00UNTS 9,034,444 23,932 pUpo{ASED POWER 9,668,650 -4,873 291967,230 2 240,204 -1,968,'112 -1,839,5__ TMPA Facilities Chg• 2 -2,288,709 19,059 TWA Coverage Return ---6'101,-- 7,6990938 7,194,f368 0.0809K • 8,951,495 ,699,938 30,14896 Subtotal 23,865,360 110* 37.50895 32.264% peMand PP 8,921 24 11,099 9,547 -706,859 -1,872 290590 2 _879,439 -756,480 TWA Dispatching -21344,650 2 c_-==--°_=_=' TMPA Capacity Sales -}7,210 6,4,929 0,080% $ 6,953,005 30 Subtotal 32.264% 30.14895 PURCHASED POWER 21,550,300 111* - 'Og7.508A; 67,558 2 102X388 3,124,239 5 584 2,717,645 2580239 32 258 631 173'776 801 • 80011,830 224, 1 491, TWA GC Fuel 662,230 7 297,656 1,003,875 X883,790 -19,111 TT1PA Purchases 31825,590 7 },-768,772 -594,727 - TWA Econ. Dispatch _2,266,400 7 990,489 86,289 TwA EnergY Sales 2,685,312 8 0.84395 ----====c=- Subtotal 112* 3,471,160 26.241% 38.995% 10,233,250 33.9208+ PP-VARIABLE ==^317 ~10,487149 103,500 - 554,315 - -9,638, 32,99695 0.32695 p Total - 31,783,550 113* ---11' 36.353` 30.325% PURCHASED POWER o~ Q I i i w , Mw V ~iAfY4 Kom y Cana Di ti- 3 Solved: 08-21-1992 ® 17:03:38 DENTON MJNIGIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 COST OF SERVICE ALLOCATION - EXPENSES ACCOUNTS TOTAL DOLLARS A.F. RESIDENTIAL COM'1ERCIAL INDUSTRIAL LIGHTINO PURCHASED POWER 11,2400204 9,668,650 9,034,444 23,932 ThPA Facilities Chg. 29,967,230 2 1T1PA Coverage Return -6,101,870 2 2,288,709 11968,712 1,839,576 -4,873 Subtotal Demand PP 23,865,360 110* 8,951,495 7,699,938 7,194,868 19,05 37,508% 32,264% 30.148% 0.080% 9, 547 8,921 24 TWA Dispatching 29,590 2 11,099 -1,372 -879,439 -756,480 -706,859 TWA Capacity sales -21344,650 2 Subtotal PURCHASED POWER _ 210550,300 11l* 6,037,508 6,953,005 - ==6,436,929 1702109K TWA GC Fuel 8,011,830 7 2,717,645 2,1020388 30124,239 67,558 TMPA Purchases 662,230 7 224,631 173,776 258,239 5,584 TM'A Econ. Dispatch 3,8250590 7 I 1,297,772 656 1, -594OO3,,727 875 1,491 -883,,780190 32,258 _12,118 Ti~su Energy Sales -2,266,400 7 -768, Subtotal 86,289 PP-VARIABLE 100233,250 112* 30471,160 2,685,312 30990,489 - - 33.920% 26,241% 38.995% 0.84396 Total - v cn PLRCFtASED POWER 31,783,550 113* - 11,554,315 " 9,638,317 "==10,487,419 103,500 P) n ro ro 35.35396 30,32596 32.99696 0.326% n ~ c , y J I ro I N Y 0 v kWju:rs], v+', G.:.e e1 y.: ,..av.• PrraW 4~.auy~~ qp}j~yp' r~nlMr- ...va+..a •+ygn•u 1. -Yrr1 ~r.iy I~aLty \Nd1~N AWP*l I~ DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 COST OF SERVICE ALLOCATION - EXPENSES ACOOUNTS TOTAL DOLLARS A.F. RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING PRODUCTION 08M City Fuel Cost 219720310 7 1,008,220 779,965 1,159,062 250063 Production O&M 3,028,081 2 1,135,782 976,982 912,898 2,418 Total PRODUCTION O&M 6,000,391 114* 2,144,002 1,756,948 2,071,960 27,481 35.731% 29.281'% 34.530% 0.458% TRANMSISSION 08M Engineering 28,534 2 10,703 9,206 8,602 23 Substations 287,798 2 107,948 92,855 86,765 230 Overhead Lines 140,945 2 520866 45,475 420492 113 Total TRANMSISSION OEM 457,277 115* 171,517 147,536 137,859 365 37,508% 32.264% 30,148% 01080 DISTRIBUTION 08M Engineering 247,634 105 100,341 83,406 46,212 17,675 Substations 219,279 3 80,177 73,656 65,446 0 Overhead Lines 1,107,424 103 421,734 387,430 298,260 0 underground Lines 463,105 104 176,362 162,016 124,727 0 Line Transformers 4540700 5 2090939 192,862 51,899 0 Maters 396,108 11 232,900 155,248 7,381 579 Security Lights 73,068 12 0 0 0 73,068 a n Street Lights 155,903 13 0 0 0 155,903 Miscellaneous 759,008 105 307,550 255,642 141,643 54,174 Total o m DISTRIBUTION O&M 3,876,229 116* 1,°'9,002 1,310,259 735,569 301,398 -4)-n 39,446% 33,8028% 18.976% 7.776% "o o 1 r 4 M 1 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 COST OF SERVICE ALLOCATION - EXPENSES ACOCUNTS TOTAL DOLLARS A.F. RESIDENTIAL OOMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL LIQHTING CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS Records & Collection 462,540 8 407,147 54,010 1,130 253 Meter Reading 384,861 9 277,075 97,141 10,081 564 Uncollectible Accts. 260,000 109 99,486 71,640 85,643 3,231 Total CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS 1,107,401 117* 783,708 222,790 96,854 4,048 70,770% 20.118% 8.746% 0.366% j MSTOMFR SERVICES Custamer Services 604,860 8 532,423 700628 1,478 331 Customer Information 390,025 8 343,316 45,542 953 213 Total CUSTOMER SERVICES 994,885 118* 875,740 116,170 2,431 544 88.024% 11.677% 0.244% 0.055% r Subtotal A&G Allocator 12,4360183 119* 5,503,969 3,553,704 30044,673 333,837 44.258% 28.576% 24.482!% 2.684% ADMIN. & GENERAL Salaries 416,757 119 184,447 119,090 102,032 11,187 office Supplies 29,602 119 13,101 8,459 7,247 795 Injuries & Damages 957 119 424 273 234 26 w Q Employee Benefits 83,139 119 36,795 23,757 200354 2,232 ro Miscellaneous 4290359 119 190,024 122,692 105,117 11,526 c Maintenance 917,227 119 405,944 262,102 224,559 240622 n m Total - ADMlN. & GENERAL 1,877,041 120* 830,735 536,374 459,544 50,387 44,258% 28.376`K 24.482% 2.684% ~ 1 { I DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 COST OF SERVICE ALLOCATION EXPENSES ACCOUNTS TOTAL DOLLARS A.F. RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING DEPRECIATION Production- 768,014 101 288,069 247,793 231,539 613 - Transmission 192,123 102 72,062 61,987 57,921 153 Distribution 2,005,004 105 8120427 6750306 374,166 143,105 General 299,859 108 1170153 98,949 72,548 11,209 Total DEPRECIATION ---30265,000 121* - 10289,711 1,034,035 736,173 155,081 39,501% 33.202% 22,547% 4,750% TAXES Transfer to City 2,294,000 108 896,252 756,987 555,009 850753 Total TAXES -2,294,000 122* --8960252 756,987 5550009 850753 39.069% 32,999% 24,194% 3,738% OTHER REVENUES Service Center Rents -190,000 108 -740232 -620697 -45,968 -7,102 Miscellaneous Rev. -3160000 8 -273,157 -36,899 -772 -173 Total OTHER REVENUES -5060000 123* -352,388 -99,596 --46,741 -7,275 69,642% 19,683% 9,237% 1.438% TOTAL - M n EXPENSES 510149,774 124* 19,722,594 15,4690820 15,236,076 721,283 o = 38.559% 30,244% 29,787% 1,410% n c 0 rD -n ~I C) N I 'tMom, 011':"'"..w Solved; 48-21.1992 8 71,03,38 UNION MUNICIPAL O11LI11ES OEHI04, TEXAS : POMER COSI PER fUEL hOOEL EIECTRCOSi OST of f SERVICE SERVICE R ALLOCAIIOH - EXPENSES 1993 T1 Temp Svc TOIAI DOLLARS A,f. R1 - Resided R2 • Resident GS - Gen(254 45 - OeN234 GP - GS Pri. LP; l9 Pri, 01 -Govt Bid li - t 9 n ACCOUNTS 23932 1,917 PURCHASoO POMEA 255,218 6,465,353 -402,021 •1,813 •1,624 161,326 11,012,618 1,666, 257 2,713,281 _51,479 1,304,33 29,967,230 2 29{ 598 1,S65,U61 -..463,244 6,353 ihPA facilities Chg. 34,111 2, 1,512,366 i9,9S9 0 02 % _ I 203,299 5,101,526 0.069% IRA Coverage Return 6,101,810 1,890,042 Subtotal 23,665,360 1141 133,415 6,818,481 6'125,649% 1.920% 8 Demand PP 0.559% 36.9441 6 1,956 24 252 325 •624 1,590 2165, 343 681 •19,973 -501,,149 •154,419 1,812 IfiS 10,933 THPA Dispatching 29,590 2 -13,107 .866,331 801,716 T11PA Capacity Sales 2,344,650 2 17,210 5,1'.7 183 578 4,606,653 1,419,659 0.669% O.U21% 1,106,699 0.852% 21,316% 6.569% 1,962,682 ,521,410 Subtotal :21,550,309 1111 124,413 5,5271410 1,920% 370 PURCHASED POMER 0,559% 36,949% 466,322 61,558 2, 866 582 84,525 2,151,132 36,110 5,584 193 8,011,630 7 90,245 2,621,350 1,,135 ,441 6,981 171 5 620 32,258 ,463 211,166 114 134,874 13 424 40,360 1,021621, 1750 223, -19,111 659 IMPA OC fuel 1 1,113 662,270 1 , 1,254,540 119,142 ,241 608,516 132,180 • ,229 •461, 566 •251,363 23,91 TMPA Purchases 43 115 3,825,590 1 23,563 •743 TM➢A Eton. 9ispatth 2,266,446 1 598,113 66,841% 2,916 0.029% IMPA Energy Sales 0,841% 1,174,956 101,962 2,141,511 5.845% Subtotal 3,355,629 2,964,163 }1.491% 1,453% 26:849% PP•VARIA8IE 10,233,250 file 111.121% 32.193% 20.367% 763,500 8,113 w :::1,611,512 2,841,655 291,539 7,354,224 2'616,341% 0.326% 9,021% rou m~ Iota} a 235,604 :::11,J18,S11 8,941% 0,911% 23.138% v, a PURCHASED PONEA 31,183,550 113 0,142% 35,611% 23.9481 -n M~ 0 0 h I I y WOO m""94 -1 Solved: 08-21-1992! 11:03:311 i DENTON MURICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, IEXAS - POKER COST PER FUEL OIL EtECTFIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 COST OF SERVICE ALLOCATION - EXPENSES A00OURIS IOTAt DOLLARS A.F. RI - Resident R2 - Resident OS - OenC250 OS . OW250 CP . 6S Pri. LP - L9 Pri, OI - Oovl Bld 0 - Lighting 11 - Temp Svc PURCHASED POKER TMPA Facilities Chg. 29,967,230 2 161,526 11,072,618 1,686,251 2,373,281 255,276 6,405,819 1,914,415 23,932 1,911 TMPA Coverage Return •6,101,810 2 •34,111 -2,254,598 -1,565,061 -483,244 -51,979 •1,304,353 •102,021 •4,873 -1,624 Subtotal Demand PP 23,865,360 1101 133,415 8,818,081 6,121,196 1,890,042 203,299 5,101,$26 1,512,388 19,059 6,353 0.510% 36194911 25,649% 1,928 0,852% 2131611 61589% 0.080% 0,021% TMPA Dispatching 29,590 2 165 10,933 7,590 2,343 252 6,325 1,950 24 8 TMPA CtPacitY Sales •2,344,650 2 -13,101 -666,331 -601,376 •185,681 •19,973 •501,193 •154,419 -1,812 -624 Subtotal 1 PURCHASED POKER 21,550,300 111$ 120,413 1,962,682 5,521,410 1,106,699 183,578 4,606,653 1,419,859 11,210 5,131 0.559% 36.949% 25.6491; 1.920% 0.852% 21.316% 6.389% 0,080% 0.023 TMPA OC Fuel 6,011,830 7 90,295 2,627,350 1,631,735 808,582 84,525 2,151,132 466,322 61,558 2,330 TMPAPurchases 662,230 1 7,463 211,168 134,814 13,441 6,981 111,895 38,110 5,584 193 TMFA Ecan, Dispatch 3,825,590 7 43,115 1,254,540 119,112 424,291 40,360 1,027,150 223,620 32,258 1,113 TMPA Energy $alsa •2,266,400 1 •25,543 •143,229 •461,588 •251,363 •23,911 •608,516 -132,480 •19,111 -659 Subtotal PP-VARIABLE 14,233,250 1121 115,331 3,355,829 2,084,163 1,134,956 101,962 2,141,511 598,113 66,289 2,916 1.121% 32,193% 20.3611 11,091% 1.055% 26.849% 5.845% 0.843% 0,029% PUMASED POKER 31,183,550 1131 235,844 11,318,51E 1,611,512 2,841,655 291,539 1,354,224 2,018,031 103,500 8,713 a 0.742% 35.611% 23.948% 8,943 01911% 23,138% 6.349% 0,326% OA27% n to c J 0 M N I O O c9i V 4 4 OENION MUNICIPAL UTItIIIES DEMON, TEXAS - POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELLCTRIC COST or SfRVICf STUDY • FISCAL YEAR 1993 COST OF SERVICE ALLOCATION - EXPENSES ACCOUNTS TOTAL MAAS A.F. RI - Resident R2 - Resident GS - GeM250 (is • Oen)250 GP • GS Pri, tP • L9 Pri. GI Govl Bld L1 Lighting 11 Tanp Svc PRODUCTION 06M City Fuel cost 2,972,310 1 33,499 914,121 605,358 329 655 Production 06M 3,028,081 2 18,928 f, 118,854 116,669 239812 31,358 198,049 113,143 25,063 865 Total 25,195 641,291 199,508 2,418 PROOUCJION 044! 6 DO0,391 !!is 606 $0,426 2,093,515 1,382,026 569,467 57 ,153 1.'445,340 313,250 21,481 JRANMSISSI9k O6M O.810% 34,891% 23.032% 91491% 0.952% 24.081% 6.220% 1,611 0-450 0,671 Engineering 28,534 2 160 10,543 7,319 2,260 241 Substations 287,798 2 1,609 106,339 13,81) 22192 6,100 f,880 23 8 Overhead tines 915 p 2,452 61,521 18,962 Total 188 52,018 36,151 f1, 162 1,201 30,129 9,286 113 TRANMSISSION 04M 451 38 ,':1l 1151 2,556 168,961 !11,288 36,215 3,895 91,149 30,128 365 DISTRIBUTION 46M 122 0,539% 16.949% 25,649% 1.9201 0.1153 21.316% 6.589% 0.080% 0,027% Engineering 211,634 105 3,207 97,134 Substations 68,260 11,416 1,798 26,939 14,887 fl,675 Sub 219,219 3 259 Overhead Lines 1,253 78,924 58,120 11,902 1,918 45,626 f4,885 111011424 103 6,592 415,142 308,868 94,161 8,234 195,859 18,293 0 Si Underground lines 463,105 fO4 2,157 113,605 129,163 39 319 3 9d3 0 269 Line Trensfvw$ 454,700 5 3,281 206,657 153,154 46,816 5,022 81,905 32,741 0 113 Meters 396,108 11 20,002 212,1199 144,200 1,930 1 Sgt 0 38,914 0 134 Security Light 13 068 12 p p 3,859 8,008 519 3,039 Street lights 155,903 13 p 0 D 0 0 0 .13,068 p w Miscellaneous 159408 IOS 0 0 O O 0 total 9,829 297,121 209,221 53,566 5,509 62,568 43,628 S4, 174 m a DISTRIBUTION 06N 3 1116 229 116r 193 16,920 1,462,083 1,012,186 271,29? 1,210% 38,215% 21,8611 21,511 436,755 233,416 301,398 •1,658 8.999% 0.1101 11,268% 6.022% 1,116% 0.120% T' o~ i I . A +iw x. Vol' ago" CERT04 MUNICIPAL UIILIIIES DENTON, IEXAS - P(MER COST PER FUEL MOO[( ELECTRIC COST OF SERYICE STUDS • FISCAL YEAR 1943 COST Or SERVICE ALLOCATION - EXPENSES ACCOURTS TOTAL DOLLARS A.E. RI • Resident R2 - Resident GS - Gen(250 GS - Gen)250 OP - GS Pri, LP • Lg Pri. G1 • Govt Bid LT - lighting TI - letup Svc CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS Records 6 Collection 462,540 8 34,966 372,181 50,141 615 186 210 2,000 2S3 1,063 Meter Reading 384,861 9 28,012 249,002 9,244 6,019 1,655 2,101 4,995 984 1,896 Uncollectible Accts. 260,000 109 3,339 46,148 56,)91 29,264 2,528 53,851 15,239 3,231 144 Total CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS I,10704DI 1114 66,318 111,331 196,993 39,951 4,369 56,528 23,099 4,048 3,102 CUSTOMER SERVICES 51991% 64.116% 11,19311 3.241% 0.394% 5,1051; 2,08511 0,3661 0,280% Customer Sereices 604,860 8 49,125 486,698 65,571 882 243 353 31662 331 1,398 Customer Information 390,029 8 29,484 313,832 42,285 569 156 228 2,361 213 896 Total CUSTOMER SERVICES 994,685 118= 75,210 800,530 101,862 1,451 399 580 6,023 544 2,286 1.56011 80,465% 10.8421 0.146% 0.0401 0.05811 0.6051' 0.055% 0.230% Subtotal AbOAliocator 12,436,183 1194 241,490 5,262,480 2,816,954 914,381 93,333 2,036,953 665,911 333,831 11,839 ADMIN, 8 GENERAL 1.942% 42,3161 23.[261 1,353% 0.150% 16.319% 5.35511 2.684% 0,095% Salaries 416,751 119 8,093 176,354 960318 30,643 3,128 68,262 22,316 11,181 411 Office Supplies 290602 119 S15 12,526 6,846 2,111 222 4,849 1,585 195 28 Injuries S OwSes 957 119 19 405 221 10 1 151 51 26 1 0 r) Employee Benefits 83,139 119 1,614 35,181 19,226 6,113 624 13,618 4,452 2,232 14 to Q Misceiiafaous 429,359 119 8,331 181,661 99,292 31,569 3,222 10,326 22,991 11,526 409 „e Maintenance 9110221 114 11,811 388,133 212,115 61,440 6,884 19,235 49 114 14,622 813 om Total ADMIN. &GENERAL 1,811,041 1204 36,444 194,286 434,019 138,012 14,081 301,445 100,509 SO1381 1,181 0,! 1.942% 42,313 23,126% 7,353% 01150% 16.3191 5,3551 21684% 0,095% o v r* V mom Mw DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS : POWER COST PER FUEL NOEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY • FISCAL YEAR 1993 COST OF SERVICE ALLOCATION - EXPENSES ACCOUNTS TOTAL DOLLARS A.F. RI • Resident R2 • Resident OS - Gen(250 GS • Gen)250 GP - GS Fri, LP • l9 Pri. 61 - Govt Old LT lighting 71 - Temp Svc DEPRECIATION Production 768,014 101 4,293 283,116 196,981 60,824 6,542 164,113 Sg,601 613 204 Transmission 192,123 102 1,014 10,988 49,211 15,215 1,637 41,069 12,658 153 51 Distribution 2,005,004 105 25,964 786,463 552,619 141,500 14,554 218,112 120,531 143,105 2,096 Central 299,859 108 2,820 114,333 19,869 22,401 2,359 41,182 18,859 11,209 201 Total DEPRECIATION 3,265,000 1211 344151 1,255,560 818,833 239,941 25,091 411,135 102,650 155,081 2,552 1.046% 38.455% 26.911% 1.34916 0.768% 14.00% 6.201% 4.150% 0.018% TAXES Transfer to City 2,294,000 108 21,515 814,611 611,110 111,423 18,044 365,542 144,280 85,753 1,531 Total TAKES 2,294,000 1224 21,515 874,611 611,110 171,423 18,044 365,542 144,280 85,153 1,531 0.940% 38,129% 26,642% 1.413% 0.181% 15.935% 6.289% 3.138% 0,067% OTHER REVENUES Service Center Rents •190,000 108 •1,187 •12,445 •50,620 -14,198 •1,494 •30,216 -11,950 •1,102 -127 Niscellmous Rev. •3114000 8 -23,886 -254,268 -34,260 •461 •121 •184 -1,913 •113 -726 Total OTHER REVENUES •506,000 1234 -25,615 -326,713 •84,880 •14,659 -1,621 -30,460 •13,863 •1,275 •853 5,074% 64,568% 16.715% 2.89711 0.323 6,020% 2.140% 1.438% 0.169% TOTAL w EXPENSES S1,149,174 1244 543,793 19,118,801 12,326,127 4,290,764 440,413 10 5D4 639 3,111,518 721,283 25,515 ro ,D 11063% 31,495 24.099% 8.389% 0,863 20,531% 6,095% 1.410% 0.050% 00 J 0 N N I 1 1 *AIM C~,siw fNj." w a w Solved; 08-21-1952 111 17;03;38 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE ` FISCAL R 1993 ST OSERVICE ALLOCATION INTEREST ACOOUNTS TOTAL DOLLARS A.F. RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL Bond i LIWTINO 792,718 6690541 490,895 75,847 Bond Interest t 2,029,000 108 TOTAL INTEREST 210290000 126* 792,718 8 - 669,541 42490,95 763,847 .738'K po I -0 to a n to s rD !D a ~n c o m -n o~ 0 uy,m 1 wow Solved, 08.21.1992 117:03:38 DENTON IR7RICIPAL UTILITIES OENTON, TEXAS : P04ER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 COST OF SERVICE ALLOCATION • INTEREST ACCCUNiS TOTAL DOLLARS A.F. Al - Resident 92 - Resident GS - Cen(250 GS - Gei)250 OP - GS Pri, LP - Lg Pri, al - Govt Bld Li Lighting 11 _ Tarp SrC Bond interest 2,029,000 108 19,082 173,636 510,568 151,620 15,999 323,315 127,613 +5,847 7,35 TOTAL _ 6.289% 75841 3.138% 0. INTEREST 2,029,000 126 19 940% 7 38,529% 5 26642% 15 1413% 10,781% 323,315 121,613 0 061% I w 10 =r s i I m a. H C O f9 O h ~•I I o~ 1 O :344:X Ili If solved: 08-21-1992 @ 17,03;36 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 COMPONENTS OF EXPENSES ACCOUNTS TOTAL DOLLARS A.F. RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING DEMAND COMPONENT D2 _ 4 OR _V-_-- 28,656,950 2 10,748,740 9,245,900 8,639,424 22,886 D3 - 4 NCP Primary 4,621,349 3 1,689,752 1,552,308 1,379,290 D4 - 4 NCP #1 Second 628,283 4 293,323 269,465 65,495 0 D5 - 4 NCP #2 Second 1,587,963 5 7370793 677,781 182,389 0 TOTAL DEMAND COMPONENT 35,504,545 13,469,608 11,745,453 10,266,598 220866 37.938% 33.082% 28.916% 0,064% CUSTOMER COMPONENT - C1 --Average-Cust. 1,3610400 8 1,198,361 158,967 3,326 745 C2 - Meter Reading 442,950 9 318,895 1110803 110603 649 213 C3 - A/C 369 Service 322,002 10 228,495 88,466 4,828 04 - A/C 370 Meters 942,047 11 553,8970 369,2190 17,550 131,290 C5 - A/C 371 Sec Lts 1380290 12 16 06 - A/C 373 City Lt 5140116 13 0 0 - 0 TOTAL -99,-- - 648 V---7288, -455 37,311 655,390 CUSTOMER 514,COMPONENT 3,720,804 2,2 1116 0 61,805% 19.578% 1,003% 17.614% ENERGY COMPONENT E2 - kWh Purchases 13,654,182 7 4,631,554 3,583,000 5,324,493 -115,135 -V V) TOTAL ENERGY COMPONENT 13,6540182 ---4,631,554 3,583,000 5,324 493 115,135 (DD v 33,920%, 26.241% 38.995% 0.843% v m ,:ut^ O Y I DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC: COST OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 COMPONENTS OF EXPENSES ACCOUNTS TOTAL DOLLARS A.F. RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING REVENUE COMPONENT R1 - Base Revenues 223,577 14 88,987 620714 68,791 3,085 R2 - E.C.A. Revenues 75,666 15 25,515 190739 29,778 634 TOTAL REVENUE COMPONENT 299,243 114,502 82,453 98,569 3,719 38.264% 27.554% 32.939% 1.243% TOTAL EXPENSES 53,178,774 20,515,312 16,139,361 15,726,971 797,130 38.578% 30,349`K 29.574% 1.499% a n C CL . N G 0 (D -43 'yl .P I U d Case" ' U•3 Solyed 08-21-1992011:03;38 OENTON MUNICIPAL UIItITIES OENIOR, IEXAS : POW COST PER FUEL MODEL ELECTRIC COS] OF SERVICE STUDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 WONENTS OF EXPENSES ACCOUNTS TOTAL DOLLARS A.E. R1 - Resident 92 - Resident GS - W250 OS • OW250 GP - GS Pri, LP Ly Pri, G1 - Govt Bid LT - Li9htir9 T1 - ferp Svc OEKAND COMPONENT 02. 4 CP 28,656,950 2 160,201 10,588,539 1,350,185 2,269,518 244,116 6,125,190 1,888,086 22,806 1,629 03 • 4 MCP Primary 4,621,349 3 26,411 1,663,341 1,231,534 311,291 40,425 961,566 313,695 0 1,018 04 - 4 NCP 61 Second 628,283 4 4,585 288,139 214,823 65,495 0 0 54,454 0 181 OS . 4 NCP 12 Second 1,591,963 S 11,532 126,261 540,342 164,138 11,651 0 136,9'98 0 411 TOTAL DEMAND COMPONENT 35,504,545 202,126 13,266,880 9,342,885 2,811,048 302,191 1,081,359 2,393,201 22,886 9,3fi4 0.51111 31,361% 26.315% 8.103% 0.851% 19,962% 6.141% 0,064% 0.026% CUSTOSER OOMPONENf Cl • Ayera9e Cust. 1,361,400 8 102,911 1,095,445 141,598 1,986 546 194 8,241 145 3,128 C2 - Meter Readi y 442,950 9 32,310 286,585 103,811 60921 1,905 2,111 5,149 649 2,182 C3 • A/C 369 SerO.8 322,002 10 19,623 208,812 84,429 3,186 1,041 0 3,143 213 895 C4 • Ale 910 Meters 942,041 11 41,$69 506,328 342,944 4,569 3,186 9,119 19,046 1,311 1,228 CS • A/C 311 Sec Lts 136,290 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 138,290 0 C6 • A/C 313 City Lt 514,116 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 514,116 0 TOTAL . CUSTOMER COMPONENT 3,120,804 202,419 2,091,229 618,843 11,289 1,219 12,144 36,180 655,390 13,433 5.440% 56.3651 18.2451 0.465% 0.196% 0.343% 01912% 11.614% 0.361% ENERGY COIgONEN[ E2 - ATIh Purchases 13,654,182 1 153,885 40411,668 2,180,889 1,514,368 144,053 3,666,013 198,139 115,135 3,911 TOTAL a n ENERGY COMPONENT 13,654,102 153,885 4,411,668 2,180,889 1,514,368 144,053 3,666,013 198,139 115,135 3,911 a 1.121% 32,193% 20.361% 11,091% 1.055% 26.849% 5,845% 0,843% 0.029% we I J 0 fA .1 A T N i 0" r" v r` Y • nNgeU h DERM MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DENTON, TEXAS = POWER COST PER FOE( MODEL ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE S1UDY - FISCAL YEAR 1993 COMPONENTS Of EXPENSES i ACCOUNTS TOTAL DOLLARS A,f, RI Resident R2 . Resident GS - Oenf25D OS - GeO250 GP • GS Pri, tP - Lg Pri. GI - Govt Bld L, Lighting TI • top Svc REVENUE COMPONENT RI - Base Revenues 2234511 14 2,995 85,992 49,359 25,338 2,099 41,354 13,211 3,085 144 R2 - E.C A. Revenues 15,666 15 848 24,661 15,320 8,343 810 20,625 4,391 634 22 TOTAL REVENUE COMPONENT 299,243 3,843 110,660 64,619 33,681 2,918 61,919 11,608 3,119 166 1.284% HMO% 211610 11.15% 0.912% 201121 5.880 1,243% 0.055% TOTAL EXPENSES 53,118,114 562,816 19,952,431 12,861,295 4,442,385 456,432 10,828,154 3,245,131 191,130 26,934 1,058% 31.520% 24.1961 81354% 0358% 20.362% 6,102% 1,499% 0.051% Y` w ro to a n {G 3 rD (D O fD '-h A I N O 1 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILI'I7ES SUMMARY OF PROPOSED RAPE CHANCE (a) Revenuf% (b) (c) (d) 1. R1 • Residential - E--- I'roPa9cd ' -a-- ---0-- - '2- R2- Resldensfe2 701,706 69"74 8. Total RealdentW 20----- ~19,639,281 (2,732) (0.4) 20,963,708 (722,722) (3,8) 20238 266 __F25 _468) ~ (9.6) 4. (',S • (mend Service 25OKgy 11,868 098 11,868 0pg 5. GT • GS Time of Use 6. G1 • LocAl Govmmmt 142 440 126,034 0 0.0 7. TI - Temporarygeve 3,209,197 8,161,968 (16,419) (11.6) 8. Total (47,229) CommerdAi 30,258 (1'6) x 16,060,002 30,762 186186 4fF4 ---1.8 9. CS • (83.161) (0.4) General Servke> 250KW 10, GI, • G"M"a Prime. 0,160,192 4,749,84 1 70 (1,400 37,961) 1 • 631.297 404,070 (22.8) Power 1. LP Iargr (7.0) 12. Total Industrial 11,268 538 1 692, (37,227) 17950 021 _ 10, 634 (676,999) 6_ ggg) (5.1) ~ 15,936,440 (2,013,676) (11.2) 13 IA) -Other Lighting 14. LT • Tra& I,lghtlM 16,163 15,263 15. LS • Str##t Lighting 38,646 98,646 00 0'0 16. DL • Decoratlvr Llghting MA 163 366,263 010 17. AF • Athletic Field Lta 61058 6,058 0 0.0 18. DI • 34,027 34.427 0 0.0 Duak•to-Dawn . Total Lighting =940 0 Q 010 19 679,086 67901~ _ 0,0 0 0.0 n i 7 20. Total DMU 64,642,817 61,840,637 (2,180.) (6.1) fD U II it ~I DENTON MUNICIPAL UTIlMES 91) MMARX OF PROPOSED RATE CHANUE (o) (b) (c) (d) Revenues Chimp EtdatinC Pro)~oaed ~ b L Rl • R tw 701,706 09K074 (2,732) (014) 2. R2 Residential 20,262,002 l9,&W,281 (722,722) (3.8) 3. Total ReA&ntW 20 903,708 20,238.266 (726,463) (3.6) 4. GS • General Service < 26OKW 11,688,098 11,668,008 0 0.0 6. GT G3 Time of Use 142,440 128,034 (16,416) (11.6) (1.61 6. G1 • Local Govenmemt 3,209,197 9,1611968 (47,229) 761 494 1.6 7. TI • Temporary gervke 90,268 30, _ 14,9(58,861 (69,161) (0.4) 8. TotalOommerdal 16,060,002 9. GS • General STvice> 26OKW 6,160,192 4,749,841 (1,400,361) (22.8) 10, op • General Primary 631,297 494,070 (37,227) (7.0) 11, i,P • Large Power 11,268 633 10,092,634 (676,999) (6.1) 12 Totalinduatrial 17,960,021 16,936,446 -T2-,5-17j,& t)) (11.2) 13 1,0 - Odmr Lighting 16,263 16,263 0 0.0 14, IT • Traffic Llghttng 38,646 38,646 0 0.0 16, LS -Street Lighting 368183 366,183 0 0.0 18. DL • Decorative lighting 6,068 6,068 0 0.0 17. AF • AtLletic Field IA& 34,027 34,027 0 0.0 18. DI • Dusk•t.o-Down Lights _ 229,940 229,940 0 0.0 n n. 679,086 0 0.0 m 19. Toad I4hting 879,086 a m n , 20. Total DMU 64,642,817 61,8401637 (2,802,180) (5.1) c~ 1 DENTON MI.INICIPAI. LTTHMES DEVEI.OPNMNT OF PROPOSED RATE CHANGE (A) (b) (c) (d) (0) W (g) Bluing Existing, lintes Proixxved Rates _ Chsnke Units _ Rate Revmxa Itnte Revenue Residential ^ Rl-RESIDENTIAL : 1. Cust"Wr 0mv 24,880 6.60 101,720 0.50 161,720 0 0.0 2. Energy Charm! 91106 42.30 386,194 1?.00 382,462 (2,732) (0.7) 3. E.C.A. Chnrgr 0,106 17.00 164.802 17.00 154,802 0 0.0 4. ToWR1 8,106 77.06 701,706 76.76 698,974 (2,732) (0.4) R2•RF,SIDENTIAL Cuslorar t 1mv : 6. Singlc Pluue 261,208 7.50 1,9691060 7.60 1,069,060 0 0.0 6. Three Phase 3,668 16.00 6:1,620 16.0 63,620 0 0.0 Energy Charge 7, Sua=r.Flrst 3,000 kWh 162,665 64.60 8,314,703 54,50 8,314,703 0 0,0 8. 8ummer.Over 3,000 kWh 8,748 60.00 684,880 60.00 684,880 0 0.0 9. Wintcr First 1,000 kWh 66,603 49.60 2,747,399 42.00 2,331,IW (410,273) (16.2) 10. Winter:Over 1,000 kWh 47,146 44.60 2,097,997 96.00 1,7911W8 (306,449) (14.6) 11. E.C.A. Clargc 284,962 17.00 4,604,3r,4 17.00 4,504,354 0.0 12. Total R2 264,902 76.47 20,262,002 73.74 19,639,281 4722,722) (3.6) N (1 lLl 13 Total Residential 274,068 76.49 20,963,708 73.64 20,'1;18,265 (726,463) (3.6) fD a J C) G7 O1 I Imo] v o Fr~ eras w«.:.~ . . I DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DEVELOPMENT OF PROPOSED RATE CHANGE (a) (U) (e) (d) (e) (t) (g) Billing Existing Rates Proposed Rates Change Units Rate Revenue Rate Revenue $ % I Commercial GS-GENERAL SERVICE < 25OKW: Customer Charge : 14. Single Phase 22,636 16.00 339,626 15.00 339,525 0 0.0 16. Three Phase 12,993 20.00 269,860 20.00 269,860 0 0.0 Demand Charge : 16. First 20 kW 239,900 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 17, Over 20 kW 307,200 7.00 2,160,400 7.00 2,150,400 0 0.0 Energy Charge : 18, First 2,600 kWh 18,042 65.60 1,183,665 65.00 1,183,666 0 0.0 19. Over 2,600 kWh 142,847 35.00 4,999,645 36.00 4,999,646 0 010 20. E.C.A. Charge 180,889 17.00 2,735,113 17.00 2,735,113 0 0.0 21. Total GS<260KW 160,889 72.62 11,888,098 72.62 11,668,098 0 0.0 GS-GENERAL SERVICE> 260KW: Customer Charge : 22, Single Phase 0 16.00 0 0.00 0 0 23. Three Phase 480 20.00 9,600 60.00 28,800 10,200 200.0 Demand Charge 24. First 20 kW 9,600 0.00 0 9.00 86,400 86,400 25. Over 20 kW 206,300 7.00 1,444,100 9.00 1,860,700 412,600 28.6 a Energy Charge : 26. First 2,500 kWh 1,200 66.60 78,720 14.00 16,800 (61,920) (7P..1) N 27. Over 2,500 kWh 88,411 35.00 3,994,385 14.00 1,237,764 (1,866,631) (130,0) 0 28. E,C,A, Charge 89,611 17.00 1,623,387 17.00 1,623,387 0 0.0 c> 29. Total GS>260KW 89,611 68.63 6,150,192 63.01 4,749,841 (1,400,361) (22.8? 30. Total GS 250,600 71.13 17,818,290 65.64 10,417,939 (1,400,351) (7.0) r I 1 Maw" o..b841 /.yyai DFNTON MUNICIPAL M1LrMj MWKLOPMEN1 OF PROPOSED RA'Z'E C11ANCL (s) (b) (c) (d) (c) Y) Billing _ ExiatingRates Units Bale Protxosed ReteF Change ' TG-TIME OFUSE : - Rcweniic `&+ie Revemie g % Customer Chine : 31. Single Phase 32, Three Ptiaae 0 25.00 0 25.00 0 48 30.00 1,440 70,00 0 0.0 Demand Chvp : 3,300 1,020 139.9 33, On-Peak Deauuid 0 12.00 34. System Demand 10,500 4.00 0 10.00 0 0 42,000 4,00 0.0 0.0 35. EnergyC6vgc. 3,867 10.00 38,870 6.00 1Z 1 0.0 36. EX.A. Charge 9,607 17.00 8 136 (18,3351 (60.01 37. Total T03 _ 82,339 _ 17100 02,3;18 _ 0 (1.0 9,887 36,85 142,449 34.97 120,034 (10,416) _6116) Gl -LOCAL GOW,,RNW NT Customer Charge : 38. Sh4le Phase 1,002 15.00 20,880 15.00 201880 M. Them' Phase U 0.0 0 20.00 0 20.00 p 40, Demand Charge : 161,600 8.00 0 0.0 4'L baera Charge 47,228 29.80 1,4807,4240 8.00 (}801000 0 0.0 42, E.C.A. Charg 28.80 1.1360,106 (47.T29) (3.4) 43. Total (il 47,229 17.00 802,899 17,00 802,653 0 0.0 47,229 87.95 3,209,197 88.95 9,161,968 (47,229) (1.6) Tl-TXWORARY SERVICE : Customer Charge : 44. Single Phase 7Gfl 15.00 11,340 16.1x1 11„{40 46. 'It~ree Phase 0 20.00 0 0.0 0 24,0(1 a n 47 . 1r C Charge 6 08.50 00 14,923 85.80 15,416 403 0.;; m rD 48. Eaew Charge 286 48. Total TI 31996 17.00 _ 31096 0 Oro 128.76 30,258 130,86 30,761 0 0 494 Y,6 G-, r 40, Total Commerdal ° 212,920 70.88 16/0001002 70.89 14 v =tee c~ 1 DENTON MUNICIPAL, UTILITIES DEVELOPMENT OF PROPOSED RATE CHANGE (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Billing Existing Rates Proposed Rates (0 Industrial Units Rate Revenue Rate - Re Cage _ $ % GP•GENERAL SERVICE PRIMARY 50. Customer Charge 132 50,00 61. Demand Charge 81800 80.00 7,920 1,320 20,0 25,000 8.00 200,000 9.00 226,000 62, Energy Charge 8,706 20.30 178,712 13.00 26,000 12,6 53 E.C.A. Charge 8,706 17.00 113,186 (83,647) (38.0) 54. Total GP 147,986 17,00 147,985 0 0.0 8,705 81.03 531,297 66.78 494,070 (37,227) (7.0) LP-LARGE POWER 56, Customer Charge 192 80.00 68. Demand Charge 11,520 80.00 11,620 0 010 602,800 9.00 4,526,200 9.00 4,525,200 67. Energy Charge 221,538 13.60 3,012,917 11.00 2,436,918 0 0,0 58. E.C.A. Charge 221,638 17,00 3,788,146 17.00 , (676'989) (19.1) 69, Economic Development 15,000 3,788,148 0 0.0 80, Total LP (3,16) (47,260) (3.16) (47,250) Q 221,638 50,87 11,288,633 48.27 1002,b34 0.0 (676,998} (5.1) 8?.. Total Industrial 230,243 a n 61.25 11,7 48.69 11,188,604 (613,225) (6.2) rOO ro CL J Q C) I N 7 f~t~Gki N.awna~ ~ 1 TON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DEVEL ENT OF PROPOSED RATE CIIANGE (a) (b) (c) , Billing Existing Rates Proposed Rates) (OChan a (g) ( Units Rate Revenue - g Rate Revenue $ % Llght(nE{ LO-OTHER LIGHTING 62. Energy Charge 223 61.40 11,462 61.40 11,462 63. E.C.A. Charge 223 17.00 3,701 17A0 31791 0 0 0.0 0.0 64. Total LO 223 68.40 16,263 68.40 16,263 a 0.0 LT-TRAFFIC LICIMI TG,, 66. Energy Charge 666 61.40 29,041 61.40 29,04E 66. E.C.A. Charge 686 _ 17.00 9,806 17.00 91806 0 0.0 67. Total LT 666 68.40 3P,646 68.40 38,646 0 ~0.0 LS-STREET LIGHTING Facilities Charge r 68. Sodium Vapor; 100 Watt 36,306 4.76 172,449 4.76 172,449 0 0.0 69, Sodium Vaporr260 Watt 17,746 6.76 119,786 6.76 119,786 0 0.0 70. Sodium Vapor; 400 Watt 276 8.60 2,338 8.60 2,338 0 0.0 71. KC.A. Charge 3,623 17.00 61,691 17.00 61,691 0 0.0 72. Total LS 276 1,296.14 356,183 1,96.14 368,183 0 010 DL-DECORATIVE LIGHTING t w n 73. FaciiBties Charge 471 3,70 1 1° s ,743 3,70 1,743 0 0.0 f c i 74. F.C.A. Charge 196 17.00 31316 17.00 3,316 0 0.0 76. Total DL 471 10.74 61068 10.74 6,068 0 0,0 ro I Ol I N R: ys4:-d';- O 7 TON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DEVEL ENT OF PROPOSED RATE CHANGE (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) Billing Existing Rates Proposed Rates Change Units Rate Revenue Rate Revenue $ % AF-ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTING : Customer Charge : 78, Single Phase 129 20.00 2,680 20,00 2,680 0 0.0 77. Three Phase 61 30.00 1,630 30.00 11630 0 0.0 Demand Charge : 78. On-Peak 0 4,60 0 4.60 0 0 010 79. Off-Peak 17,000 1.00 17,000 1100 17,000 0 0.0 Energy Charge yA 80. On-Peak 0 76.00 0 76.00 0 0 0.0 f 81, Off-Peak 237 37,60 8,888 37.60 8,888 0 0.0 82, E.C,A. Charge 237 17,00 4,029 _ 17.00 4,029 0 0.0 83. Total AF 237 143.67 34,027 143.67 34,027 0 010 D1•DUSK TO DAWN LIGHTING Facilities Charge : 84, Sodium Vapor: 100 Watt 7,904 7.60 69,280 7.60 69,280 0 0.0 86. Sodium Vapor: 260 Watt 3,168 9.76 30,888 9.76 30,888 0 010 88. Sodium Vapor:400 Watt 317 12.00 3,804 12.00 3,804 0 0.0 87, Mercury Vapor: 100 Watt 13,691 6.26 84,944 6.26 84,944 0 0.0 88. Mercury Vapor: 250 Watt 269 7126 1,960 7,26 1,960 0 OA a n 89. Mercury Vapor:400 Watt 1,948 8.00 16,684 8.00 16,684 0 0.0 n 90. E,C.A. Charge 1,970 17.00 33,490 17.00 33,490 0 0.0 O1 91. Total DI 1,948 118.04 229,940 118.04 229,040 0 c~ rni 92, Total Lighting 3,719 182.60 679,088 182.60 679,088 0 010 n' e U Schedule H-1.0 R1-E R1-P R1 R1 1.009-01-1992 10:52:55 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITITES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES it R1 - RESIDENTIAL LIMITED USE (Annual) Existing Rate Schedule customer charge @ $ 6,50 Demand Charge (NCP): All kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Energy Charger All metered kWh/Month @ $ 0.0421000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $ 6,50 R1 - RESIDENTIAL LIMITED USE (Annual) Proposed Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $ 6.50 Demand Charge (NCP); All kW/Month @.$ 0.000000/kW Energy Charge: All metered kWh/Month @ $ 0.0420000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $ 6.50 USAGE EXISTING PROPOSED INCREASE PERCENT kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) CHANGE 0 $ 6.50 $ 6.50 $ 0.00 0.00% 50 $ 9.46 $ 9.45 0.02) ( 0.11%) 100 $ 12.43 $ 12.40 0.03) ( 0,24%) 150 $ 15.39 $ 15.35 0.04) ( 0.26%) 200 $ 18.36 $ 18.30 0.06) ( 0.33%) 250 $ 21.32 $ 21.25 0.07) ( 0.33*) 300 $ 24.29 $ 24.20 0.09) ( 0.37%) j " 350 $ 27.25 $ 27.15 0.10) ( 0,37%) 366* $ 28.20 $ 28.09 0.11) ( 0.39%) 400 $ 30.22 $ 30.10 0.12) ( 0.40%) 500 $ 36.15 $ 36.00 0.15) ( 0.4196) 0 NCP kW p I * Average kWh i i It Schedule 11-1.1 R2-E-S R2-P-S R2-S R2 k,POB-21-1992 15109:19 10 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES , 1 s R2 - RESIDENTIAL (Summer) Exisitng Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $ 7.50 Demand Charge (NCP): All. kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Energy Charge! First 3,000 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0600000/kwh over 3,000 kWh/Month @ $ PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $ 7.50 r R2 - RESIDENTIAL (Summer) Proposed Rate Schedule k Customer. Charge @ $ 7.50 Demand Charge (NCPkW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW All Energy Charge: 0.0545000/kWh First 3,000 kwh/Month @ $ 0.0600000/kWh over 3,000 kWh/Mo::th @ $ PCA/FCA 0.0170000/kWh r minimum Bill @ $ 7.50 INCREASE USAGE EXISTING PRCHARGE (DECREASE) PCHANGE kWh CHARGE -----0 $ -----7.50 $ -25.30 $ 00.00 0.00% .00 0.008 250 $ 25.37 $ 0.00 0.00% 500 $ 43.25 $ 43.25 $ 0.00 0.008 1,000 $ 79.00 $ 79.00 $ 0.00 0.008 92.79 $ 0.008 11193* $ 92.79 $ 0.008 1,500 $ 114.75 $ 150 50 $ 0.00 0.008 0.00 0.00% 2,500 $ 186.25 $ 186.25 $ 0.00 0.00% 31000 $ 222.00 $ 222.00 $ 4,000 $ 299.00 $ 299.00 $ 0.00 0.008 0 NCP kW * Average kWh Schedule H-1.2 i R2-E-W R2-P-W R2-W R2 ki)8-•21-1992 15:1.0 s 06 i3 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES ha R2 - RESIDENTIAL (Winter) Existing Rate Schedule pr @ Customer Charge $ 7.50 Demand Charge (NCPkW/Month @ $ 0-000000/kW All Energy Charge: 0,0495000/kwh First 1,000 kWh/Month @ $ Over 1,000 PCA/FCA kwh/Month @ $ 00170000/kwh ~ $ 7,50 Minimum Bill R2 - RESIDENTIAL (Winter) Proposed Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $ 7.50 Demand Charge (NCP kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kw All Energy Charges 0.0420000/kWh First 1,000 kWh/Month @ $ Over 1,000 kWh/Month 0 $ 0;01870000/kWh PCA/FCA is minimum Bill @ $ 7.50 USAGE EXISTING PROPOSED INCREASE PERCENT kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) CHANGE ---__0 $ 7.50 $ _-27.50 01.870) ( 0.075$) 250 $ 24 075 $ .12 $ 37,00 (S 3.75) { 9.208) 500 $ 57.37 $ 51.75 5.62) ( 9,80%) 50 809* $ 61.29 $ 55.23 (6 6.06) ( 10.148) 11000 $ 74.00 $ 694.00 6.50 10.75) ( 10.268) 1,500 $ 104.75 $ 121.50 14.00) { 10.338) 21000 $ 135.50 149.00 17.25) ( 10.388) 21500 $ 166.25 $ 176.50 20,50) ( 10.418) 3400 $ 197.00 $ 231.50 27.00) ( 10.448) 4,000 $ 258.50 $ ` 0 NCP kW` i * Average kWh I b Schedule H-1.3 GS-E GS-P GS GS-20 It 6-21-1992 15:11:32 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES I-A GS - GENERAL SERVICE (Annual) Existing Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $15.00 Demand Charge (NCP): First 20 kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Over 20 kW/Month @ $ 7.000000/kW Energy Charge: First 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0656000/kWh Over 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0350000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $15.00 GS - GENERAL SERVICE < 250 KW (Annual) Proposed Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $15.00 Demand Charge (NCP): First 20 kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Over 20 kW/Month @ $ 7.000000/kW Energy Charge: First 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0656000/kWh Over 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0350000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $15.00 USAGE EXISTING PROPOSED INCREASE PBRCENT kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) CHANGE 2,000 $ 160.20 $ 180.20 $ 0.00 0.008 41000 $ 299.50 $ 299.50 $ 0.00 0.008 5,000 $ 351.50 $ 351.50 $ 0.00 0.008 61000 $ 403.50 $ 403.50 $ 0.00 0.008 7,000 $ 455.50 $ 455.50 $ 0.00 0.008 81000 $ 507.50 $ 507.50 $ 0.00 0.008 9,000 $ 559.50 $ 559.50 $ 0.00 0.008 10,000 $ 611.50 $ 611.50 $ 0.00 0.008 4 12,000 $ 715.50 $ 715.50 $ 0.00 0.009 14,000 $ 819.50 $ 819.50 $ 0.00 0.008 20 NCP kW r I 7 t GS-E GS-P250 GS GS-500 Schedule 11-1.4 ~e08-21-1992 15113t28 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES r GS - GENERAL SERVICE (Annual) Existing Rate Schedule { Customer Charge @ $15.00 Demand Charge (NCP)s First 20 kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Over 20 kW/Month @ $ 7.000000/kW Energy Charges First 21500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0656000/kWh Over 21500 kWh/Month @ $ 0,0350000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $15.00 r GS - GENERAL SERVICE > 250 KW (Annual) Proposed Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $60.00 Demand Charge (NCP)s All kW/Month @ $ 9.000000/kW Energy Charges All metered kWh/Month @ $ 0.0140000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0:170000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $60.00 USAGE EXISTING PROPOSED INCREASE PERCENT kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) CHANGE 50,000 $ 6,051.50 $ 61110.00 $ 58.50 0.978 - - 100,000 $ 8,651.50 $ 71,660.00 991.50) ( 11.468) 125,000 $ 91951.50 $ 81435.00 11516.50) ( 15.248) 150,000 $ 11,251.50 $ 91210.00 21041.50) ( 18.148) 175,000 $ 12,551.50 $ 9,985.00 2,566.50) ( 20.458) 200,000 $ 13,851.50 $ 10,760.00 3,091.50) ( 22.328) 225,000 $ 151,151.50 $ 11,535.00 31616.50) ( 23.878) 250,000 $ 16,451.50 $ 12,310.00 4,141.50) ( 25.178) 300,000 $ 19,051.50 $ 13,860.00 51191.50) ( 27.258) 350,000 $ 21,651.50 $ 15,410.00 6,241.50) ( 28.838) 500 NCP kW t { ,r jM r ~ r: 1 Schedule H-1.5 GP-E GP-P GP GP 1^08-21-1992 15tl4:12 i DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES GP - GENERAL SERVICE PRIMARY (Annual) Exisitng Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $50.00 Demand Charge (NCP): All kW/Month @ $ 8.000000/kW Energy Charge: All metered pCA/FCAth @ $ 0.01 070000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $50.00 ~r GP - GENERAL SERVICE PRIMARY (Annual) Proposed Rate Schedule J Customer charge @ $60.00 Demand Charge (NCP): All kW/Month @ $ 9.000000/kW Energy Charge: All metered pCA/FCAth @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $60.00 USAGE EXISTING PROPOSED INCREASE PERCENT kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) CHANGE 20,000 $ 21396.00 $ 2,460.00 $ r 64.00 r2.67% 40,000 $ 3,142.00 $ 31060.00 82.00) ( 2.61%) 50,000 $ 3,515.00 $ 31360.00 155.00) ( 4.418) 60,000 $ 3,888.00 $ 3,660.00 228.00) ( 5.86$} 70,000 $ 41261.00 $ 31960.00 301.00) ( 7.06%) 801000 $ 41634.00 $ 41260.00 374.00) ( 88.007% 90,000 $ 51007.00 $ 4,560.00 447.00) 100,000 $ 5,380.00 $ 4,860.00 520.00) ( 9.678) 00000 $ 6,872.00 $ 6,060.00 812.00) ( 11.82%) 14 200 NCP kW i 1 ' kaJ LP-E LP-P LP LP Schedule H-1.6 s )<<)8-21-1992 15114:39 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES s LP - LARGE POWER PRIMARY (Annual) Existing Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $60.00 Demand Charge (NCP): All kW/Month @ $ 9.000000/kw Energy Charge: All metered kWh/Month @ $ 0,0136000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $60.00 LP - LARGE POWER PRIMARY (Annual) Proposed Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $60.00 Demand Charge (NCP): All kW/Month @ $ 9.000000/kw Energy Charge: All metered kWh/Month @ $ 0.0110000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $60.00 `I USAGE EXISTING PROPOSED INCREASE PERCENT kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) CHANGE 250,000 $ 30,210.00 $ 29,560.00 650.00) ( 2.158) - 500,000 $ 37,860.00 $ 36,560.00 1,300.00) ( 3.43%) IAJ 625,000 $ 41,685.00 $ 40,060.00 1,625.00} ( 3.90%) 750,000 $ 45,510.00 $ 43,560.00 11950.00) { 4.288) 875,000 $ 490335.00 $ 47,060.00 2,275.00) ( 4.618) 11000,000 $ 53,160.00 $ 50,560.00 2,600.00) ( 4.898) 1,125,000 $ 56,985.00 $ 54,060.00 2,925.00) ( 5.138) 11250,000 $ 60,810.00 $ 57,560.00 3,250.00) ( 5.348) 1,500000 $ 68,460.00 $ 64,560.00 31900.00) { 5.708) 1,750,000 $ 76,110.00 $ 71,560.00 4,550.00) ( 5.988) 2,500 NCP kW t i t a I Schedule I-1,0 R1-PX TU-R-W R1 R1 ti~09-01-1992 10:53:37 D'ENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITITES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES R1 - RESIDENTIAL LIMITED USE (Annual) Denton Proposed Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $ 6.50 Demand Charge (NCP): All kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Energy charge: ,t All metered kWh/Month @ $ 0.0420000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum pill @ $ 6.50 R - RESIDENTIAL (Winter) TUEC Existing Rate Schedule customer Charge @ $ 6.00 Demand charge (NCP): All kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Energy charge: First 600 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0550000/kWh y Over 6500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0265000/kWh sr PCA/FCA @ $ 0.024650o/kWh Minimum Sill @ $ 6.00 USAGE DENTON TUEC INCREASE PERCENT kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) CHANGE $ _ --0 $ ---"-6.50 $ 6.00 0.50) ( 7.69%) 50 $ 9.45 $ 9.98 $ 0.53 5.61% 100 $ 12.40 $ 13.96 $ 1.56 12.58$ 150 $ 15.35 $ 17.94 $ 2.59 16.87% 200 $ 18.30 $ 21.93 $ 3.63 19.84% 250 $ 21.25 $ 25.91 $ 4.66 21.93% 300 $ 24.20 $ 29.89 $ 5.69 23.51% 350 $ 27.15 $ 33.87 $ 6.72 24.75% 366* $ 28.09 $ 35.15 $ 7.06 25.13% 400 $ 30410 $ 37.86 $ 7.76 25.78$ 500 $ 36.00 $ 45.82 $ 9.82 27.28% 0 NCP kW * Average kWh : <e i r R2-P-SX TO-R-S R2-S R2 Schedule I-1,1 f)8-21-1992 15:21148 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES R2 - RESIDENTIAL (Summer) Denton Proposed Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $ 7.50 Demand Charge (NCP)t All kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Energy Chargel First 3400 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0545000/Y.Wh Over 3,000 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0600000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum B,11 @ $ 7.50 R - RESIDENTIAL (Summer) TUEC Existing Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $ 6.00 Demand Charge (NCP)t All kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Cnergy Charge: J All metered kWh/Month @ $ 0.0550000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0246500/kWh Minimum Bill @ $ 6.00 USAGE DENTON TUEC INCREASE PERCENT kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) CHANGE 0 $ 7.50 $ 6.00 - 1.50) { 20.00w) 250 $ 25,37 $ 25.91 $ 0.54 2.138 500 $ 43.25 $ 45.82 $ 2.57 5.948 750 $ 61.12 $ 65.73 $ 4.61 7.54% 3,1000 $ 79.00 $ 85.65 $ 6.65 8.428 1r193* $ 92.79 $ 101.02 $ 8.23 8.87% 10500 $ 114.75 $ 125.47 $ 10.72 9.348 21000 $ 150,50 165.30 $ 14.80 9.838 21500 $ 186.25 $ 205,12 $ 18.87 10,13% 3,000 $ 222.00 $ 244.95 $ 22.95 10.348 4,000 $ 299.00 $ 324,60 $ 25.60 8.569 0 NCP kW Average kWh , ~I Schedule 1-1.2 R2-P-WX TU-R-W R2-W R2 0)8-21-1992 15:20:50 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ` COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES R2 - RESIDENTIAL (Winter) Denton Proposed Rate Schedule s. Customer Charge @ $ 7.50 Demand Charge (NCP): All kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Energy Charge: First 1,000 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0420000/kWh Over 1,000 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0380000/kWh { PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $ 7.50 R - RESIDENTIAL (Winter) TUEC Existing Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $ 6.00 Demand Charge (NCP): All kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Energy Charge: Virst 600 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0550000/kWh Over 600 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0265000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0246500/kWh minimum Bill @ $ 6.00 USAGE kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) PERCENT 0 $ 1.50 $ 6.00 1.50) { 20.00x 250 $ 22.25 $ 25.91 $ 3.66 16.458 500 $ 37.00 $ 45.82 $ 8.82 23.848 750 $ 51.75 $ 61.46 $ 9.71 18.76% 809* $ 55.23 $ 64.48 $ 9.25 16.758 10000 $ 66.50 $ 74.25 $ 7.75 11.65% 10500 $ 94.00 $ 99.82 $ 5.82 6.19% 21000 $ 121.50 $ 125.40 $ 3.90 3.21% 2f500 s 149.00 $ 150.97 $ 1.97 1.32% 3,000 $ 176.50 $ 176.55 $ 0.05 0.036 41000 $ 231.50 $ 227.70 3.80) ( 1.64%) 0 NCP kW r * Average kWh ;a i GS-PX TU-G-20 GS GS-20 Schedule I-1.3 :'41)8-21-1992 15t2509 ~i DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES GS- GENERAL SERVICE < 50OKW (Annual) Denton Proposed Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $15.00 Demand Charge (NCP)i First 20 kW/Month @ $ 0,000000/kW Over 20 kW/Month @ $ 7.000000/ItW Energy Charges First 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0630000/kWh Over 21500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0322500/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $15.00 GENERAL SERVICE @ 20kW (Annual) TUEC Existing Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $15.00 Demand Charge (NCP): First 10 kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Over 10 k47/Month @ $ 6.800000/kW Energy Charge: First 21500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0572000/kWh Next 3,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0300000/kWh Next 1,700 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0300000/kWh Over 7,700 kWh/ISonth @ $ 0.0066000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0195520/kWh Minimum Bill @ $15.00 USAGE DENTON TUEC INCREASE PERCENT kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) CHANGE $ $ 236.50 $ 61.50 35.14% 4,000 $ 288.87 $ 349.20 $ 60.33 20.88% 5,000 $ 338.12 $ 398.76 $ 60.64 17.93% 6,000 $ 387.37 $ 448.31 $ 60.94 15.73% 7,000 $ 436.62 $ 497.86 $ 61.24 14.0391 8,000 $ 485.87 $ 540.39 $ 54.52 11.22% 9,000 $ 535.12 $ 566.54 $ 31.42 5,97% 10,000 $ 584.37 $ 592.70 $ 8.33 1.43% 12,000 $ 682.87 $ 645.00 37.87) ( 5.55%) 140000 $ 781.37 $ 697.30 84.07) ( 10.76%) 20 NCP kW 1 GS-PX TU-G-50 GS GS-50 Schedule I-1,4 t438-21-1992 15;25;47 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES Is GS- GENERAL SERVICE < 500EW (Annual) ,y Denton Proposed Rate Schedule Customer Charge Demand Charge (NCP)t @ $15,00 V First 20 kW/Month @ $ 0,000000/kW Over 20 kW/Month @ $ 7,000000/kW Energy Charges First 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0630000/kWh Over 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0,0322500/kWh Minimum Bill PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh @ $15.00 GENERAL SERVICE @ 5akW {Annual) TUEC Existing Rate Schedule Customer Charge Demand Charge (NCP)= @ $15,00 First 10 kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW t Over 10 kW/Month @ $ 6,800000/kW Energy Charge; First 21500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0572000/kWh tr Next 3,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0,0300000/kWh Next 6,800 kWh/Month @ $ 0,0300000/kWh Over 12,800 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0066000/kWh Minimum Bill PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0195520/kWh $15.00 iy USAGE DENTON TUEC INCREASE kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) PERCENT -~--.Y. } CHANGE 5,000 wYYrww_Yw ; 101000 $ $ 548.1.2 794.37 $ 602.76 $ 54.64 9.97% 12,500 $ 917.50 $ 850.52 $ 56.15 7.07% 15,000 4, 974,40 $ 56.90 17,500 $ I1,06403,62 $ 11046.80 $ 6.18 0.59% E' 20,000 $ 1,286.87 $ 1,177.56 51,57) ( 4.43%) a 220500 $ 1,410,00 $ 1,242.94 109.31) ( 6.49%) 25000 0,000 $ 1,533.12 $ 11308.32 $ 167.06) 85% 224.80) ( 11.66%) 3 35,000 $ 2,025,62 $ I1 439.08 340. ( 19.12%) 455.778) 8) ( 22.50%) 50 NCP kW t IMAM T{ 7 f' Schedule 1-1.4 GS-PX TU-G-50 GS GS-50 &08-21-1992 1505147 E` DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES a GS-- GENERAL SERVICE < 50OKW (Annual) Denton Proposed Rate Schedule cF Customer Charge @ $15.00 Demand Charge (NCP)s 00000/kW First 20 kW/Month @ $ 0.0 Over 20 kW/Month @ $ 7.000000/kW Energy Charget First 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0630000/kWh Over 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0322500/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $15.00 GENERAL SERVICE @ 50kW (Annual) TUEC Existing Rate Schedule ,a Customer Charge @ $15.00 Demand Charge (NCP)t First 10 kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Over 10 kW/Month @ $ 6.800000/kW Energy Charget First 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.05'72000/kWh Next 3,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0300000/kWh Next 61800 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0300000/kWh Over 12,800 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0066000/kwh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0195520/kWh Minimum Bill @ $15.00 USAGE DENTON TUEC INCREASE PERCENT ! kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) CHANGE -5,000 $ 548.12 $ 602.76 $ --54.64 9.978 10,000 $ 794.37 $ 850.52 $ 56.15 7478 12,500 $ 917.50 $ 974.40 $ 56.90 6.208 15,000 $ 11040.62 $ 11046.80 $ 6.18 0.598 17,500 $ 1,163.75 $ 1,112.18 51.57) ( 4.438) 20,000 $ 1,286.87 $ 1,177.56 109.31) ( 8.498) ` 22,500 $ 1,410.00 $ 11242.94 167.06) ( 11.858) ' 25,000 $ 1,533.12 $ 1,308.32 224.80) ( 14.668) 30,000 $ 1,779.37 $ 11439.09 340.29) ( 15,12%) 35,000 $ 20025.62 $ 1,559.84 455.78) 50 NCP kW J V l a Schedule 1-1.5 GS-PX TU-G-100 GS GS-100 4.,,)8-21-1992 15s2504 i .kDENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES f' r GS- GENERAL SERVICE < 50OKW (Annual) Denton Proposed Rate Schedule t j Customer Charge @ $15.00 Demand Charge (NCP)s First 20 kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kw Over 20 kw/Month @ $ 7.000000/kW Energy Charges First 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0630000/kWh Over 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0322500/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $15.00 GENERAL SERVICE @ lOOkw (Annual) TUEC Existing Rate Schedule s+ Customer Charge @ $15.00 Demand Charge (NCP)s JA First 10 kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Over 10 kw/Month @ $ 6.600000/kW Energy Charge: First 21500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0572000/kWh Next 3,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0300000/kWh Next 15,300 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0300000/kWh Over 21,300 kWh/Month @ $ 0,0066000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0195520/kwh Minimum Bill @ $15.00 i USAGE DENTON TUEC INCREASE PERCENT kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) CHANGE - x 10,000 $ 10144.37 $ 1,190.52 $ 46.15 4.03% 20,000 $ 1,636.87 $ 11686.04 $ 49.17 3.00% 25,000 $ 1,883.12 $ 1,847.22 35.90) ( 1.91%) 30,000 $ 2,129.37 $ 1,977.98 151.39) ( 7.11%) 35,000 $ 20375.62 $ 2,108.74 266.88) ( 11.23%) 40,000 $ 21621.87 $ 2,239.50 382.37) ( 14.58%) 45,000 $ 21868.12 $ 21370.26 497.86) ( 17.36%) 50,000 $ 31114.37 $ 20501.02 613.35) ( 19.69%) 60,000 $ 30606.87 $ 21762.54 844.33) ( 23.41%) 70,000 $ 41099.37 $ 30024.06 1,075.31) ( 26.23%) 100 NCP kW s i , . 4 l 9 1., Schedule I-1.6 GS-P250X TU-G-500 GS GS-500 I,Y)8-21-1992 15:3205 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILI I.ES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES ,a GS - GENERAL SERVICE > 250 KW (Annual) Denton Proposed Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $60.00 Demand Charge (NCP): E All kW/Month @ $ 9.000000/kW Energy Charge= All metered kWh/Month @ $ 0.0140000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $60.00 GENERAL SERVICE @ 500 KW (Annual) TUEC Existing Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $15.00 Demand Charge (NCP): First 10 kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Over 10 kW/Month @ $ 6.800000/kW Energy Charges I First 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0572000/kWh Next 31500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0300000/kWh Next 83,300 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0300000/kWh C 89,300 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0066000/kWh -1 1 PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0195520/kWh Minimum Hill @ $15.00 USAGE DENTON TUEC INCREASE PERCENT kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) CHANGE 500000 $ 60110.00 $ 5,892.60 217.40) ( 3.56%) 100,000 $ 7,660.00 $ 8,119.82 $ 459.82 6.008 125,000 $ 81435.00 $ 81773.62 $ 338.62 4.01% 150,000 $ 91210.00 $ 91427.42 $ 217.42 2.36% 175,000 $ 91985.00 $ 10,081.22 $ 96.22 0.96% 200,000 $ 10,760.00 $ 10,735.02 24.98) ( 0.238) 225,000 $ 110535.00 $ 11,388.82 146.18) ( 1.17) 250,000 $ 12,310.00 $ 12,042.62 267.38) ( 2.17%) 300,000 $ 13,860.00 $ 13,350.22 509.78) ( 3.68%) 350,000 $ 15,410.00 $ 14,657.82 752.18) ( 4.888) 500 NCP kW 1 \ 1 1 t f~ GP-PY TU-P-250 GP GP Schedule 1-1.7 }-408-21-1492 15:37:35 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES GP - GENERAL SERVICE PRIMARY (Annual) Denton Proposed Rate Schedule I iG Customer Charge @ $60.00 Demand Charge (NCP): All kW/Month @ $ 9,000000/kW Energy Charges All metered kWh/Month @ $ 0.0130000/kWh r. PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $60.00 w GENERAL SERVICE PRIMARY @ 250 KW (Annual) TUEC Existing Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $15.00 Demand Charge (NCP): First 10 kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Over 10 kW/Month @ $ 6,800000/kW Energy Charge: First 21500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0561000/kWh Next 31500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0289000/kWh Next 40,800 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0289000/kWh Over 46,800 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0055000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0189900/kWh Minimum Bill @ $15.00 xA Yr'P•: USAGE DENTON TUEC INCREASE PERCENT ---_kWh CHARGE CHAPIE (DECREASE) CHANGE 2 5OtDCO 5,000 $ ~3,060.00 $ -2,912.25 147.75) ( -4,838) 62,500 $ 3,810.00 $ 4,034,62 $ 224.62 5.908 75 $ 41185.00 $ 4,340.74 $ 155.74 3.728 87,500 75,000 $ 41560.00 $ 41646.87 $ 86.87 1.918 $ 41935.00 $ 4,952.99 $ 17.99 0.368 100,000 $ 5,310.00 $ 51259.12 50.88) ( 0,968) 112,500 $ 51685.00 $ 5,871 37 119 125,000 $ 6,060.00 ) 188,63) ( 2.118) 150,000 $ 61810.00 $ 6,483.62 326.38) ( 4.798) 175,000 $ 71560.00 $ 7,095.87 464.13) { 6.148) 250 NCP kW Schedule 1-1.8 LP-PX TU-P-25X LP LP t")8-21-1992 15140:15 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES 9 LP - LARGE POWER PRIMARY (Annual) tDenton Proposed Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $60.00 Demand Charge (NCP): All kW/Month @ $ 9.000000/kW Energy Charges All metered kWh/Month @ $ 0.0110000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/k.Wh Minimum Bill @ $60.00 : GENERAL SERVICE PRIMARY @ 21500 KW (Annual) TUEC Existing Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $15.00 Demand Charge (NCP)s First 10 kW/Month @ $ 0.000000AW Over 10 kW/Month @ $ 6.800000/kW Energy Charges First 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0561000/kWh Next 3,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0289000/kWh r Next 423,300 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0289000/kWh M Over 429,300 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0055000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0189900/kWh Minimum Bill @ $15.00 USAGE DENTON TUEC INCREASE PERCENT kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) CHANGE 250,000 $ 29,560.00 $ 28,987.50 572.50) ( 1.948) 500,000 $ 36,560.00 $ 39,305.62 $ 2,745.62 7.516 625,000 $ 40,060.00 $ 42,366.87 $ 21306.87 5.768 750,000 $ 43,560.00 $ 45,428.12 $ 11868.12 4.298 875,000 $ 47,060.00 $ 48,489.37 $ 1,429.37 3.048 11000,000 $ 500560.00 $ 51,550.62 $ 990.62 1.968 1,1251000 $ 54,060.00 $ 54,611.87 $ 551.87 1.028 11250,000 $ 57,560.00 $ 57,673.12 $ 113.12 0.208 t 115000000 $ 64,560.00 $ 63,795.62 764.38) ( 1.188) 11750,000 $ 71,560.00 $ 69,918.12 11641.88) ( 2.298) 2,500 NCP kW Iv 1,5 Schedule J-1.0 R1-PX DC-R-W R1 R1 ii09-01-1992 10:54:10 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITITES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES fa R1 - RESIDENTIAL LIMITED USE (Annual) Denton Proposed Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $ 6.50 Demand Charge (NCP): All kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Energy Charge: All metered kWh/Month @ $ 0.0420000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh minimum Bill @ $ 6.50 RESIDENTIAL (Winter) Existing Denton County Electric Cooperative Rate Customer Charge @ $ 8.25 ,r Demand Charge (NCP): All kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/0 Energy Charge: First 700 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0733940/kWh Over 700 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0633940/kWh ' PCA/FCA @ $-0.0050000/kWh minimum Bill @ $ 8.25 ,a USAGE DENTON DCEC INCREASE PERCENT kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) 26.92- „L.:;... p $ 6.50 $ 8.25 $ 1.75 26.92 50 $ 9.45 $ 11.67 $ 2.22 23.49$ 100 $ 12.40 $ 15.08 $ 2.68 21.61$ 150 $ 15.35 $ 18.50 $ 3.15 20.52$ 200 $ 18.30 $ 21.92 $ 3.62 19.78$ 250 $ 21.25 $ 25.34 $ 4.09 19.25$ 300 $ 24.20 $ 28./6 $ 4.56 18.84$ 350 $ 27.15 $ 32.18 $ 5.03 18.53$ 316* $ 28.09 $ 33.28 $ 5.19 18.48$ 400 $ 30.10 $ 35.60 $ 5.50 18.27$ 500 $ 36.00 $ 42.44 $ 6.44 17.89$ fE0 NCP kW * Average kWh { t rf V fl h t Schedule J-1.1 R2-P-SX DC-R-S R2-S R2 ?A8-21-1992 16:05:39 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES R2 - RESIDENTIAL (Summer) Denton Proposed Rate Schedule Customer Charg: @ $ 7.50 Demand Charge (NCP): All kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW j " Energy Charges First 3,000 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0545000/kWh Over 3,000 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0600000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh to Minimum Bill @ $ 7.50 j° RESIDENTIAL (Summer) Existing Denton County Electric Cooperative Rate Customer Change @ $ 8.25 Demand Charge (NCP): All kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Energy Charges All metered kWh/Month @ $ 0.0733940/kWh PCA/FCA @@ $ 8.2550000/kWh minimum Sill USAGE DENTOIJ DCEC INCREASE PERCENT kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) CHANGE -----0 $ - --7.50 $ - -8.25 $ 0.75 10.00% 250 $ 25.37 $ 25.34 0.03) ( 0.128) 500 $ 43.25 $ 42.44 1$ 0.81) ( 1.878) ( 750 $ 61.12 $ 59.54 1.58) 2.598) 2,36) ( 2.999) 11000 $ 79.00 $ 76.64 84 3.188) 11193* $ 92.79 $ 2.95) 10500 $ 114.75 $ 110.84 3.91) ( 3.410 21000 $ 150.50 $ 145.03 5.47) ( 3.638) 2,500 $ 186.25 $ 179.23 7.02) ( 3.770 31000 $ 222.00 $ 213.43 8.57) ( 3.86%) 4,000 $ 299.00 $ 281.82 17.18) ( 5.75%) , 0 NCP kW * Average kWh ~x I 7 I I E Schedule J-1.2 R2-P-WX DC-R-W R2-W R2 f,8-21-1992 16t06s20 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES Pail R2 - RESIDENTIAL (Winter) Denton Proposed Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $ 7.50 Demand Charge (NCP)t All kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Energy Charge: 0 0420000/kWh First 1,000 kWh/Month @ $ Over 1,000 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0380000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh t. Minimum Bill @ $ 7.50 + RESIDENTIAL (Winter) Existing Denton County Electric Cooperative Rate Customer Charge @ $ 8.25 Demand Charge (NCPkW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW All Energy Charges First 700 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0733940/kWh Over 700 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0633940/kWh PCA/FCA @ $-08.2550000/kWh Minimum Bill USAGE DENTON DCEC INCREASE PERCENT kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) CHANGE -_-_-_0 $ -7.50 $ 0 34 $ 0.75 10.00$ 250 $ 22.25 $ 2 3.09 13.89% 500 $ 37.00 $ 42.44 $ 5.44 14.70% 750 $ 51.75 $ 59.04 $ 7.29 14.09% 809* $ 55.23 $ 62.49 $ 7.26 13.15% 1,000 $ 66.50 $ 73.64 $ 7.14 10.74% 11500 $ 94.00 $ 102.84 $ 8.84 9.40% 2,000 $ 121.50 $ 132.03 $ 10.53 8.67% 2,500 $ 149.00 $ 161.23 $ 12.23 8.21% 3,000 $ 176.50 $ 190.43 $ 13.93 7.89% 4000 $ 231.50 $ 248.82 $ 17.32 7.48% 0 NCP kW I * Average kWh t L d Schedule J-1.3 GS-PX DC-C-S GS GS-20 4118-21-1992 1607:27 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES E~ (Annual) GS- Denton propoVICE < sed Rate O Schedule @ $15.00 Customer Charge Demand Charge (NCP): 4,000040/kW First 20 kW/Month @ $ Over 20 kW/Month @ $ 7.000000/kW Char e: EnFirst 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0630000/kWh Over 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0322500/kWh PCA/FCA @@ $15,001470000/kWh Minimum Bill COMMERCIAL (Summer) Exisitng Denton County Electric Cooperative Rate Customer Charge @ $15.00 Demand Charge (NCP)s 0,000040/kW t: All kW/Month @ $ Energy Charger 0,4873070/kWh All metered kWh/Month @ $ PCA/FCA @ $15.0050000/kWh Minimum Bill DCEC INCREASE PERCENT kWh USAGE DE CHARGE RGE CHARGE (DECREASE) CHANGE -2,000 $ - 175.00 $ _-_1.79.61 $ 4.61 2.63% 4,000 $ 288.87 $ 344.22 $ 55.35 19.16% 51000 $ 338.12 426.53 $ 88.41 26.15% 6,000 $ 387.37 $ 508.64 $ 121.47 31.36% 71000 $ 436.62 $ 591.14 $ 154.52 35.39% 80000 $ 485.87 $ 673.45 $ 187.58 38.61% 91000 $ 535.12 $ 755.76 $ 220.64 41.23% 10,000 $ 584.37 $ 838.07 $ 253.70 43.41% 12,000 $ 781.37 $ 1,167.29 $ 385.92 49.39% 14,000 $ 20 NCP kW 'N d GS-PX DC-C-W GS GS-20 Schedule J-1.4 P')8-21-1992 16 3 07 :55 (~f DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES i GS- GENERAL SERVICE < 500KW (Annual) Denton Proposed Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $15.00 Demand Charge (NCP)s to First 20 kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Over 20 kW/Month @ $ 7.000000/kW Energy Charges ~.a First 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0630000/kWh Over 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0322500/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $15.00 COMMERCIAL (Winter) Existing Denton County Electric Cooperative Rate Customer Charge @ $15.00 Demand Charge (NCP)t All kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Energy Charges All metered kWh/Month @ $ 0.0823070/kWh PCA/FCA @ $-0.0050000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $15.00 USAGE DENTON DCEC INCREASE PERCENT kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) CHANGE 4,000 00 $ 288.87 $ 324.22 35.35) ( 12.248) 51000 $ 338.12 $ 401.53 $ 63.41 18.75% 6,000 $ 387.37 $ 478.4 $ 91,47 23.618 7,000 $ 436.62 $ 556.14 $ 119.52 27.37% 00000 $ 485.87 $ 633.45 $ 147.58 30.37% gr000 $ 535.12 $ 710.76 $ 175.64 32.82% 10,006 $ 584.37 $ 788.07 $ 203.70 34.86% 12,000 $ 682.87 $ 942.68 $ 259.81 38.05% 14,000 $ 781.37 $ 11097.29 $ 315.92 40.438 20 NCP kW ~ tl r r \ 1 t Act Schedule J-1.5 1 GS-PX DC-I-S GS GS-100 (1)8-21-1992 16:08s40 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES .y GS- GENERAL SERVICE < 500KW (Annual) Denton Proposed Rate Schedule t Customer Charge @ $15.00 Demand Charge (NCP): First 20 kW/Month @ $ 0.000000/kW Over 20 kW/Month @ $ 7.000000/kW Energy Charge: First 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0630000/kWh Over 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0322500/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $15.00 INDUSTRIAL (Summer) Existing Denton County Electric Cooperative Rate ,A Customer Charge @ $25.00 Demand Charge (NCP)s All kW/Month @ $ 9.350000/kW Energy Charges All metered kWh/Month @ $ 0.0337230/kWh PCA/FCA @ $-0.0050000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $25.00 USAGE DENTON DCEC INCREASE PERCENT kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) CHANGE 100000 $ 1,144.37 $ 1,247.23 $ 102.86 8.99% 20,000 $ 1,636.87 $ 1,534.46 102.41) ( 6.26%) 25,000 $ 11883,12 $ 1,678.07 205.05) ( 10.89%) 30,000 $ 2,129.37 $ 11821.69 307.68) ( 14.45%) 350000 $ 21375.62 $ 11965.30 410.32) ( 17.27%) 40,000 $ 21621.87 $ 21108.92 512.95) ( 19.56%) 45,000 $ 2,868.12 $ 2,252.53 615.59) ( 21,46A) 500000 $ 30114.37 $ 20396.15 718.22) ( 23.06%) 60,000 $ 3,606.87 $ 2,683.38 923.49) ( 25.60%) 70,000 $ 4,099.37 $ 2,970.61 1,128.76) ( 27.538) 1.00 NCP kW i 4 Schedule J-1.6 GC)-PX DC-I-W GS GS-100 fAB-21-1992 16:09:02 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES GS- GENERAL SERVICE < 500KW (Annual) Denton Proposed Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $15,00 Demand Charge (NCP)t First 20 kW/Month @ $ 0.0001100/kW Over 20 kW/Month @ $ 7.000000/kW r' Energy Charges First 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0630000/kWh ' Over 2,500 kWh/Month @ $ 0.0322500/kWh I PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $15.00 INDUSTRIAL (Winter) Existing Denton County Electric Cooperative Rate Customer Charge @ $25.00 Demand Charge (NCP)t All kw/Month @ $ 8.260000/kW Energy Charget All metered kWh/Month @ $ 0.0337230/kWh PCA/FCA @ $-0.0050000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $25.00 USAGE DENTON DCEC INCREASE PERCENT kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) CHANGE --r - 10,000 $ 1,144.37 $ 11138.23 6.14) ( 0.548) 20,000 $ 1,636.87 $ 11425.46 211.41} ( 12.92%) 25,000 $ 1,083.12 $ 1,569.07 314.05) ( 16.68%) 30,000 $ 2,129.37 $ 11712.69 416.68) ( 19.57%) 35,000 $ 2,375.62 $ 11856.30 519.32) ( 21.86%) 40,000 $ 20621.67 $ 11999.92 621.95) ( 23.728) 45,000 $ 20868.12 $ 21143.53 724.59) ( 25.260 50,000 $ 3,114.37 $ 21287.15 827.22) ( 26.568) 60,000 $ 3,606.87 $ 2,574.38 1,032.49) ( 28.63%) 700000 $ 4,099.37 $ 2,861.61 1,237.76) ( 30.198) I J 100 Nf:P kw rr T )uf GS-P250X DC-I-W GS GS-500 Schedule J-1.7 f0)8-21-1992 16:09154 i DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES 00,E GS - GENERAL SERVICE > 250 KW (Annual) Denton Proposed Rate Schedule Customer charge @ $60.00 Demand Charge (NCP)s All kW/Month @ $ 9.000000/kW Energy Charges All metered kWh/Month @ $ 0.0140000/kWh PCA/FCA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $60.00 i I INDUSTRIAL (Winter) Existing Denton County Electric Cooperative Rate Customer Charge @ $25.00 Demand Charge (NCP)i ,x,11 kW/Month @ $ 8.260000/kW Energy Charges All, metered kWh/Month @ $ 0.0337230/kWh PCA/FCA @ $25.0050000/kWh Minimum Bill !z i. USAGE DENTON DCEC INCREASE PERCENT kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) CHANGE s - 50,000 $ 61110.00 $ 51591.15 518.85) ( 8.499) 100,000 $ 71660.00 $ 71027.30 632.70) ( 8.268) 125,000 $ 81435.00 $ 7,745.97 689.63) ( 8.188) 150,000 $ 9,210.00 $ 8,463.45 746.55) ( 8.118) 175,000 $ 9,985.00 $ 9,181.52 803.48) ( 8.058) 200,000 $ 10,760.00 $ 9,899.60 860.40) ( 8.009) 225,000 $ 11,535.00 $ 10,617.67 917.33) ( 7.95%) 250,000 $ 12,310.00 $ 11,335.75 974.25) ( 7.919) 300,000 $ 13,860.00 $ 12,771.90 11068.10) ( 7.858) 350,000 $ 15,410.00 $ 14,208.05 1,201.95) ( 7.809) 500 NCP kW 3u !u { I Schedule J-1,8 GS-P250X DC-I-S GS GS-500 leIB-21-1992 16:10:09 t" DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF RETAIL RATES GS - GENERAL SERVICE > 250 KW (Annual) Denton Proposed Rate Schedule Customer Charge @ $60.00 Demand Charge (NCP): All kW/Month @. $ 9.000000/kW Energy Charger All metered kWh/Month @ $ 0.0140000/kWh PCA/FGA @ $ 0.0170000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $60.00 INDUSTRIAL (Summer) Existing Denton County Electric Cooperative Rate Customer Charge @ $25.00 Demand Charge (NCP): All kW/Month @ $ 9.350000/kW Energy Charge: All metered kWh/Month @ $ 0.0337230/kWh PCA/FCA @ $-0.0050000/kWh Minimum Bill @ $25.00 I USAGE DENTON DCEC INCREASE PERCENT kWh CHARGE CHARGE (DECREASE) CHANGE ~ 50,000 $ 61110.00 $ 61136.15 $ 26.15 0.438 100,000 $ 71660.00 $ 70572.30 87.70) ( 1.148) 125,000 $ 8,435.00 $ 81290.37 144.63) ( 1.718) 1500000 $ 91210.00 $ 91008.45 201.55) ( 2.198) 175,000 $ 91985.00 $ 9,726.52 258.48) ( 2,598) 200,000 $ 10,760.00 $ 10,444.60 315.40) { 2.938) 2250000 $ 11,535.00 $ 11,162.67 372.33) { 3.230 250,000 $ 12,310.00 $ 11,880.75 429.25) ( 3.498) 300,000 $ 13,860.00 $ 13,316.90 543.10) ( 3.928) 350,000 $ 15,410.00 $ 14,753.05 656.95) ( 4.268) 500 NCP kW j ;y i E VFW, I I Fr, Schedule K-1.0 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF GS RATE WITH INDUSTRIAL RATE 2 3 4 5 6 1 11.10170299 1161289071 1290431299 1290460099 2420174199 2420392499 LF USAGE; Demand 2,680 1,824 1,741 2,314 1,620 Winter 1,348 2,420 1,080 Summer 1,671 2,836 2,841 1,984 I'`i 3,172 3,412 6,160 6,421 4,384 3,280 Total Energy : qp ppp 30,000 30,000 30,000 Block 1 30,000 30,000 681,240 022,040 904,460 963,670 787,280 699,000 Block 2 Block 3 823,320 1,169,820 1,020,340 1,192,830 300,920 1,327,000 Total 1,434,680 1,811,080 1,964,800 2,186,400 1,118,200 1,968,600 72.7 52.0 66,2 34.9 81.7 Load Factor•% 82,0 UNIT RATES : DMU Proposed GS Customer Charge 60.000000 60.090000 00,000000 60.000000 80.000000 eb.000000 i Demand Cherge 9.000000 9.000000 9.000000 9.000000 91000000 9.000000 Energy Charge 0.014000 0.014000 0.014000 0.014000 0.014000 0.014000 Fuel Charge 0.417000 0,017000 0.017000 0.017000 0.017000 0.017000 t + TU Extaing GS Customer Charge 15.000000 15,000000 16.000000 16.000000 16.000400 16,004000 Demand Charge First 10 kW 01000001) 0.000000 0.000000 O.000OUO 0,000000 0,40000 Over 10 kW 6.800004 6.800000 6,800000 6.800000 0.800000 6.804000 Energy Charge ` Block 1 0,057200 0.067200 0,067200 0.067200 0,067200 0,067200 Block 2 0.090000 0.030000 0.030000 0.030000 0.030000 0.030000 Block 3 0.008800 0,000000 0.008800 0.000800 0.008804 0.000800 Fuel Charge 4,019662 0.019662 0.019562 0,019662 0.019662 0.019662 DC Existing IS Customer Charge 26,000000 25.000000 26.040040 26.000000 26.000040 26.00000 Demand Charge Summer 91360000 9,3600110 9.60000 9,360000 9,360004 9,36000 Winter 8,280000 8,280000 6.280000 8.280000 8.260000 8.284000 Energy Charge 0.033723 0.033723 0.033723 0.033723 0.038723 0.033723 Fuel charge (0.005000) (0,005000) (0.006000) (0.005040) (0,006000) (0.006040) REVENUES; lsting 98,279 117,688 137,178 161,118 88,312 129,16 DMUPr•EzlAting 73,739 87,689 107,089 117,287 74,840 90,896 DMU• DMU ,669 88,018 108,188 117,471 78,369 88,388 TU-Existing 13,569 DC-Existing 69,694 82,417 101,609 110,890 71,288 85,402 DIFFERENCE: Exist vs, Prop (22,540) (29,979) (29,609) (33,830) (13,472) (32,609) Proposed vs. TU 170 1,672 (619) 0(898) (3,673, 61493 ' Proposed vs, DC 4,046 5,172 80160 * Demand values do not ino).ude ratchet levels for TU and DC. 1 .r h Schedule K-1.1 pENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF GS RATE WITH INDUSTRIAL RATE 6`? 8 9 10 11 12 7 262.0168399 2620365299 2620458599 2620706099 2620734299 2520741199 1:1 USAGE: Demand Summer 3,416 8,483 1,832 3,278 3,387 2,578 l s Winter 9,372 6,048 1,684 2,928 5,388 3,172 Total 6,787 12,631 3,416 8,204 8,786 6,748 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Energy I i Block 1 Btock2 1,190,700 2,172,270 822,720 1,098,6E0 1,617,690 1,019,180 Block 3 1,772,810 2,993,890 1,209,880 2,471,880 840,310 484,080 Total 2,998,600 6,196,160 1,862,400 3,598,660 2,488,000 1,533,240 74.7 79.6 38.8 36.6 Load Factor•% 60.6, 66.8 UNIT RATES ; DMU Proposed GS Customer Charge 60.000000 60.000000 80.000000 60,000000 60,000000 80,000000 i 91000000 9.000000 9,000000 9.000000 9.000000 9.000000 Demand Charge Energy Charge 00.014000 0.014000 0.014000 0,014000 0.014000 0.014000 0.017000 0 017000 ,017000 0 017000 0-017000 0.017000 Fuel Charge TU Existing GS t Customer Charge 16.000000 16.000000 16,000000 16.000000 16.000000 16.000000 Demand Charge 0.000000 First Over 1 0 kW 6.800000 6,800000 8.800000 8.800000 6.800000 8.800000 y Energy Charge Block 1 0.067200 0.057200 0.067200 0.057200 0.057200 0.067200 I Block 2 0.030000 0.030000 0,030000 0.030000 01030000 0,030000 Block 3 0.008800 0.008800 0,006600 0.006600 0.0066110 0.008800 Fuel Charge 0.019662 0.019552 0.019562 0.019662 0.019662 0.019662 DC Existing IS Customer Charge 25.0000(0 26.000000 26.000000 25-000000 26,000000 26.000000 Demand Charge Summer 9.35r,1000 9,360000 9,380000 9,360000 9,360040 9.350000 Winter 8.x:80000 8.260000 81260000 8.260000 8,260000 8.260000 Energy Charge 0.083723 0.033723 0.033123 0.033723 0.083723 0,033723 Fuel Charge (0,006000) (0,006000) (0,006000) (0.005000) (0,005000) (0.006000) REVENUES: DMU•Existing 202,914 357,396 120,236 230,031 190,349 119,442 DMU•Proposed 164,780 274,660 89,188 168,111 166,913 99,982 163,434 272,814 87,388 162,841 161,200 103,914 TLI•Existing DC-Existing 146,212 260,122 84,007 159,477 148,030 94,626 DIFFERENCE : Exist vs. Prop (48,166) (82,815) (3),036) (61,920) (33,436) (191480) Proposed vs. TU 1,326 1,706 1,810 6,270 (40287) (31932) 8,648 14,468 6,192 9,634 8,883 6,367 Proposed vs, DC + Demand values do not include ratchet levels for TU and DC. 2 ~ ~ ..t ~ ~ ~ ~ _ 11-~-• 'rte r i 1 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Schedule K-1.2 COMPARISON OF GS RATE WITH INDUSTRIAL RATE 1 13 14 16 16 17 18 2630228199 2630310199 3780381299 3860223199 3860265499 3860435199 USAGE: qs Demand:' Summer 3,042 2,692 2,192 2,790 1,742 3,687 Winter 2,726 2,606 2,064 2,362 1,624 3,216 Total 6,767 5,298 4,246 6,142 3,266 6,902 Energy ; Block 1 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Block 2 1,022,390 942,660 763,820 916,140 697,220 1,216,340 Block 3 1,399,930 2,460,740 1,654,780 624,460 794,180 738,020 Total 2,462,320 3,493,400 2,448,600 1,470,600 1,421,400 119831360 Load Factor-% 6813 88.8 79.0 39.2 59.6 39.4 UNIT RATES : DMU Proposed GS Customer Charge 60.000000 60,004000 60,000000 60.000000 60.000000 60,000000 Demand Charge 9.000000 9.000000 9.000000 9.000000 9.000000 9.000000 Energy Charge 0,014000 0.014000 0.014000 0,014000 0,014000 0.014000 Fuel Charge 0,017000 0.017000 0.017000 0.017000 0.017000 0.017000 TU Existing GS: Customer Charge 16.000000 15.000000 16.000000 16.000000 15.000000 16.000000 Demand Charge First 10 kW 0.000000 0.000000 01000000 0.000000 01000000 0.000000 Over 10 kW 6.800000 6.800000 6.800000 61800000 6.800000 6.800000 Energy Charge Block 1 0.057200 0.067200 0.067200 0.067200 0.057200 0.057200 Block 2 0.030000 0,030000 0.030000 0.030000 0.030000 0.030000 Block 3 0.006600 0.006600 01006600 0.006600 0.006800 0.006600 Fuel Charge 0.019662 0.019662 0.019662 0.019562 0.019662 0.019662 DC Existing IS : Customer Charge 25,000000 26.000000 26,000000 26.000000 26.000000 25.000000 Demand Charge Summer 91360000 9.360000 9.360000 9.360000 0.350000 91350000 Winter 8.260000 8.260000 8.260000 8.260000 8.260000 8.260000 Energy Charge 0.033723 0,033723 0.033723 0.033723 0.033723 0.033723 Fuel Charge (01005000) (0,005000) (0.006000) (0.006000) (01006000) (0.005000) REVENUES: DMU•Existing 167,368 215,101 166,527 111,943 96,263 160,927 DMU•Proposed 128,845 164,837 114,841 92,687 74,177 124,322 ' TU•Existing 128,166 148,767 111,664 96,744 74,238 128,123 DC-Existing 121,689 145,613 108,092 88,054 70,008 118,297 DIFFERENCE: Exist vs. Prop (38,723) (60,283) (41,687) (19,357) (22,075) (26,606) } Proposed vs. TU 490 6,080 3,177 (31158) (61) (31801) Proposed vs. DC 6,966 9,224 6,748 4,633 4,176 6,025 * Demand values do not include ratchet levels !or TU and DC. 3 1 \ 1 11 Schedule K-1.3 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF GS RATS WITH INDUSTRIAL ATE 23 24 21. 22 _ 19 20 3860701099 3860_ 78 9 3880789098 3870290299 3880465399 386070299 USAGF ; 3,040 1,636 2,411 4,676 Dernand : ` 31194 2,240 1,647 2,824 4,288 Summer 2,074 3,620 5,036 8,862 , 3,294 3,185 Winter 6,488 4,314 8,660 Total 90,000 30,000 Energy 30,000 30,000 30,000 897,950 1,48 30, 0 1 157,200 361590 01,471,260 1,502,220 Block 1 1,1449 986 776,380 1,640 , i' Block 2 141,220 1,096,180 2 399 200 3,013,880 Block 3 21,,146320,,440 00 1,648,800 2,283,360 976, 41.0409 65.3 46,8 Total 49.0 49.1 47.7 i Load Factor- % ' UNIT RATES: 60,000000 60.000000 60.000000 DMU Proposed GS : 60,000000 60-000000 9,000000 9.000000 80.000000 9.000000 9,000000 9.000000 0,014000 0.014000 Customer Charge 9,000000 0.014000 0,014000 0.014000 6,017000 0.017000 Demand Charge 0.014000 0.017000 E < Energy Charge 6,017000 0,017000 0.017000 Fuel Charge 16,000000 16,000000 16.000000 TU Existing GS 16.000000 16,000000 1f,000000 Customer Charge 0.000004 0.000000 0,000000 Demand Charge 0,000000 0.000000 0.000000 8,800000 8.800000 ' 8,800000 6,800000 8.800000 8.800000 First 10 kW Over 10 kW 0,067200 0.067200 ,057200 Energy Charge 0.067200 0.057200 0.067200 0,030000 0.030000 0.030000 t ' Block l 0.030000 0.030000 0 008806 0.008800 Block 2 0.030000 0.008800 0 048800 0.006600 0.019662 0,019552 ! > Block 3 0.008800 0.019662 0,019652 0.019662 0.019662 Fuel Charge 26.000000 26,600000 26.000000 DC Existing IS : 25,000000 26,000000 25,000000 t Customer charge 9.360000 9.360000 9,360000 Demand Charge 9.350000 9.360000 9.360000 8,380000 8,280000 Summer 8,280000 8,260000 0.03372 2.3 0.033723 0,033723 Winter 8'280000 0,033723 0,033 (0,005000) Energy Charge 0.033723 0033723 (0.006000) (0,006000) (0.006000) (0.006000) (0.006000) Fuel Charge 169,481 218,233 REVENUES : 166,566 110,099 184,133 72,611 120,410 113,908 DMU.Existing 87,491 130,644 5981 118,876 174,832 DMU•Proposed 131 132,,044478 88,808 132,283 68,2 66.29291 113,429 165,066 TU•Existing 124,021 82,798 123,384 DC•Exieting (39,071) (44,326) C DIFFERENCE : (34,610) (22,809) (33,689) (12 (2,48) 1634 (763 Exist vs. Prop (11317) (1,739) 6,981 8,853 Proposed va. TU (1,431) 7 160 3,321 7,023 4,692 proposed vs. DC k ppdtand valtitee do not include ratchet levels for Tt1 and DC, y I E, DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Schedule K-1.3 COMPARISON OF GS RATE WITH INDUSTRIAL RATE 24 l 19 20 21 22 23 3860700299 3860701099 388099 3860789099 3870290299 3880_ 465399 USAGE; Demand : ' 2,240 3,040 1,638 2,411 4,678 Winer 3,1994 4 2,074 3,620 1,647 2,624 4,286 ` 6 ; Wnter Total 6,488 4,314 6,660 3,185 6,036 8,862 , ~ Energy ; Block 1 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,060 30,000 1,144,960 776,380 1,167,200 683,460 097,960 1,481,640 Block 2 Block 3 1,146,440 741,220 1,098,100 976 040 2,399,200 3 01 Total 3,880 2,320,400 1,646,600 2,283,300 48.8 Load Factor-No 49,0 49.1 47.7 41.9 66.3 UNIT RATES : 1 DMU Proposed GS Customer Charge 60.000000 60.000000 60,000000 60,000000 60.000000 60.000000 9.000000 9.000000 9.000000 9.000000 9.000000 9.000000 Demand Charge ' Energy Charge 0014000 0O014000 0.014000 0.01.4000 0.014000 0.014000 .017000 0,017000 0,017000 0.017000 0.017000 Fuel Charge 0.017000 s ' TU Existing GS : Customer Charge 16.000000 16.000000 16.000000 16.000000 16.000000 16.000000 Demand Charge First 10 kW 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Over 10 kW 6.800000 6.800000 61800000 6,800000 6.800000 6.800000 Energy Charge Block 1 0.067200 0.067200 0.067200 0.067200 0.067200 0.057200 Block 2 01030000 01030000 0.030000 0.030900 0.030000 0,030000 Block 3 0.006600 0.006000 0.000600 0.006600 0.006800 0.006800 Fuel Charge 0019662 0.019662 0.019662 0.019662 0.019662 0.019662 L _ DC Existing IS i " Customer Charge 26.000000 26.000000 26.000000 26,000000 25.000000 28.000000 Demand Charge Summer 9.360000 9.360009 9.360000 9.350000 91360000 0.360000 Winter 8.260000 8.260000 8.260000 8.280000 8.260000 8.260000 Energy Charge 0.033723 0.033723 0.033723 0,033723 0.033723 0.033723 Fuel Charge (0.006000) (0.005000) (01006000) (0.005000) (0.006000) (0006000) REVENUES : DMU•Existing 166,666 110,099 164,133 72,476 169,481 218,233 DMU•Proposed 131,044 87,491 130,644 69,611 120,410 173,908 ~ 132,476 88,808 132,263 61,692 110,878 174,832 TU•Existing DC-Existing 124,021 82,790 123,304 66,291 113,429 186,065 DIFFERENCE 884) (39,071) (44,326) Exist vs. Prop (34,610) (22,609) (33,609) (12, Proposed vs. TU (1,431) (10317) (2,081) 10,634 634 (726) (725 7,023 4,692 7160 3,321 ,981 8,853 proposed vs. DC DMm nd values do not include ratchet levels for TU and DC. 4 rye.. _ , ~J TL DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Schedule K-1,4 COMPARISON OF GS RATE WITH INDUSTRIAL RATE 25 26 27 28 29 30 3880731099 3900195199 4000026199 4020229299 4040492299 4040924199 f'.w USAGE: - Demand;' Summer 2,848 1,680 2,261 2,840 2,269 2,605 t, Winter 2,673 1,449 1,839 2,648 2,307 2,220 Total 6,221 3,129 4,090 61388 4,676 4,825 Energy ; . b Block 1 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Block 2 929,570 673,930 737,300 967,980 819,920 862,260 Block 3 1,463,630 368,710 1,076,220 2,048,640 658,720 1,794,310 Total 2,423,200 962,640 1,843,520 3,036,600 1,508,640 2,688,560 Load Factor-% 63,8 42.1 61.7 77.2 45.2 76.3 UNIT RATES ; DMU Proposed GS : ' Customer Charge 60,000000 60.000000 60.000000 60.000000 60.000000 60.000000 r Demand Charge 9.000000 9,000000 91000000 9.000000 9.000000 9.000000 Energy Charge 0.014000 0.014000 0,014000 0.014000 0.014000 0,014000 Fuel Charge 0,017000 0.017000 0.017000 0.017000 0.017000 0.017000 TU Existing GS: Customer Charge 16.000000 15.000000 16.000000 16,000000 16,000000 16,000000 f Demand Charge First 10 kW 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Over 10 kW 61800000 6.800000 6.800000 61800000 6.800000 61800000 f Energy Charge Block 1 0.057200 0.057200 0.057200 0.067200 0,067200 0.057200 Block 2 0.030000 01030000 01030000 01030000 01030000 0.030000 Block 3 0.006600 0.006600 0.006600 0.006600 0,008800 01006600 Fuel Charge 0,019552 0.019662 0,019662 0,019662 01019662 0.019652 DC Existing IS : Customer Charge 25.000000 26,000000 26.000000 25.000000 25,000000 26,0000(10 Demand Charge Summer 9.360000 9.350000 9.360000 9.350000 9.350000 91360000 Winter 8.280000 8.260000 8.260000 8.260000 8.260000 8,260000 Energy Charge 0.033723 0,033723 0.033723 0.033723 0.033723 0.033723 Fuel Charge (0,005000) (0.006000) (0,006000) (0.005000) (0.005000) (0,006000) REVENUES; DMU•Existing 162,031 71,438 123,971 195,097 109,959 172,964 DMU•Proposed 122,828 68,723 94,679 143,347 88,672 127,428 TU•Existing 121,608 60,764 94,169 130,350 90,639 124,128 DC-Existing 116,913 65,627 89,488 1.35,121 83,904 120,160 DIFFERENCE; Exist vs. Prop (39,203) (12,715) (29,292) (51,761) (21,287) (45,526) Proposed vs, TU 1,320 (2,041) 521 3,997 (1,967) 3,301 Proposed vs, DC 6,916 3,096 6,191 8,226 4,768 7,268 * Demand valuer do not include ratchet levels for TU and DC. 5 Ff \ I T A Schedule K-1.5 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES COMPARISON OF GS RATE WITH INDUSTRIA RATE 31 32 33 34 35 36 4060208399 40700936199 4080263499 4090798190 4080961199 4100617399 l>a USAGE Demand:* 1,620 1,970 1,880 Summer 2,626 2,072 3,204 1,682 1,880 2,181 11816 2,676 1,940 Winter Total 4,707 3,888 6,879 3,760 31661 3,870 Energy k , Block 1 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Block 2 842,190 699,520 1,041,430 681,200 664,370 303,0800 Block 3 1,867,610 1,080,720 1,537,730 1,094,080 646,630 Total 2,729,600 1,810,240 2,609,160 1,8068 1,240454 333,089 79,4 63.8 6018 Toad Factor-% UNIT RATES : DMU Proposed GS Customer Charge 60.000000 60.000000 60.000000 60.000000 60.000000 60.000000 Demand Charge 9.000000 9.000000 9,000000 9,000000 9.000000 9.000000 Energy Charge 0.014000 0.014000 0.014000 0.014000 0.014000 0.014000 Fuel Charge 0.017000 0.011000 0.017000 0.017000 0,017000 0.017000 TIT Existing GS : Customer Charge 16.000000 15.000000 15.000000 15.000000 16,000000 16.000000 Demand Charge First 10 kW 0.000000 0.000000 01000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.00000 r Over 10 kW 6.800000 61800000 6,800000 6.800000 6.800000 6.800000 Energy Charge Block 1 0.057200 0.067200 0.067200 0.057200 0.067200 0.06720 0.030000 0.030000 0.030000 0.030000 0.030000 0.030000 Block 2 Block 3 0,006800 01006800 01008800 0.006800 01006800 0.006600 Fuel Charge 0.019562 0.019562 0.019562 0.010652 0.019662 0.019562 DC ExIoting IS Customer Charge 26.000000 26.000000 26.000000 25.000000 26.000000 25.00000 Demand Charge Summer 9.350000 9.360000 9.360000 9.360000 9.350000 9.35000 8.260000 8,260000 8.260000 8.260000 81260000 8.260000 Winter ~ Energy Charge 0,033723 0.033723 0,033723 0.033723 0,033723 0.03372 Fuel Charge (01005000) (0.006000) (0.006000) (0,006000) (0.006000) (0.006000) REVENUES : 43,888 DMU•Existing 174,377 120,826 176,307 119,673 89'685 DMU ed 46,875 127,707 91,829 134,615 90,624 72,109 • 123,987 91,031 1330463 89,602 73,752 43,001 DC-Existing sting sting 120,341 86,669 127,296 85,194 68,313 43,991 t DIFFERENCE ; 1,987 Exist vs. Prop (46,670) (28,997) (41.,792) (29,149) (17,476) q 3,720 799 1,062 922 (1,643) Proposed vs. TU 2,876 Proposed vs. DC 7,366 6,181 7,210 6,329 3,706 1,854 . Demand values do not include ratchet levels for TU and DO, 6 .w r 'I DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Schedule K-1.6 COMPARISON OF GS RATE WITH INDUSTRIAL RATE 37 38 39 40 41 42 4110074299 4110163299 4110415299 4120697199 TotalFY91 Growth 1-+ USAGE : T Demand:* , Summer 1,884 4,634 2,632 2,010 105,496 1.03863 p a Winter 1,668 4,368 2,325 2,168 102,340 1.03863 Total 3,662 8,900 4,867 4,178 207,836 1.03B63 Energy : Block 1 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 1,200,000 1.03863 Block 2 646,840 1,565,000 867,690 725,620 36,487,620 1.03863 Block 3 967,650 3,037,160 1,418,910 74,380 48,690,770 1.03863 i , Total 1,633,490 4,622,160 2,316,609 830,000 86,278,290 1.03863 Load Factor•% 63.0 71.1 65.3 27.2 66.9 UNIT RATES : DMU Proposed GS: Customer Charge 60,000000 60.000000 60.000000 60.000000 Demand Charge 9.000000 9.000000 9.000000 9.000000 Energy Charge 0.014000 0.014000 0.014000 0.014000 Fuel Charge 0.017000 0.017000 0.017000 0.017000 a, t TU Existing GS Customer Charge 16.000000 16.000000 16.000000 16.000000 Demand Charge First 10 kW 0.000000 01000000 0.000000 0,000000 Over 10 kW 8.800000 6.800000 6.800000 6.800000 Energy Charge Block 1 0.067200 0.057200 0.067200 0.067200 r. Block 2 0.030000 0.030000 0.030000 0.030000 Block 3 0.006600 0.006600 0.008600 0.006600 Fuel Charge 0.019662 0.019662 0.019662 0.019652 DC Existing IS : Customer Charge 26.000000 25.0^J000 26.000000 25.000000 Demand Charge Summer 9.360000 91360000 9.360000 9.360000 Winter 8.260000 8.260000 8.260000 8,260000 Energy Charge 0.033723 0,033723 0.033723 0.033723 Fuel Charge (0.006000) (0.006000) (0.005000) (0.005000) REVENUES: DMU•Existing 109,283 302,130 153,940 71,884 6,920,443 DMU-Proposed 83,326 224,107 116,248 64,052 4,673,951 } TU•Existing 82,867 218,668 114,797 67,978 4,668,723 DC-Existing 78,612 211,618 109,718 60,841 4,321,887 r DIFFERENCE: Exist vs. Prop (26,967) (18,023) (37,693) (7,832) (1,346,492) Proposed vs. TU 459 6,439 1,460 (31928) 16,228 Proposed vs, DC 4,714 12,689 6,529 3,211 252,064 { * Demand values do not include ratchet levels for TU and DC. 7 I~ DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILIPIES Schedule K-1.7 COMPARISON OF GS RATE WITH INVUSTRIAL RATE 43 Total FY93 x,14 USAGE Demand Summer 109,671 Winter 100,293 Total 216,886 Energy t Block 1 1,244,367 Block 2 37,897,048 Block 3 50,467,862 Total 89,611,268 Load Factor-% 68.9 i~ t,.d UNIT RATES : DMU Proposed GS : Customer Charge s Demand Charge Energy Charge Fuel Charge S TU Existing GS ' Customer Charge 4 , Demand Charge First 10 kW Over 10 kW s Energy Charga -7-2 0 Block 1 SUMmE~- r Block 2 \ + t , Block 3 Fuel Charge DC Existing IS : Customer Charge Demand Charge summer Winter t Energy Charge Fuel Charge REVENUES: DMU•Eaisting DMU•Proposed TU•Existing DC-Existing I DIFFERENCE Exist vs, Prop i Proposed vs. TU q Proposed vs. DC oc, 8 * Demand valuer do not include ratchet levels for TU and M1. DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Schedule K-2.0 COMPARISON or GP RATE WITH INDUSTRIAL RATE 6 6 v.a 1 2 3 4 TR E RA BROWN UNT_ I_N HILL- ~ftF-~Sm CHAPP APT PENNELL _ i , USAGE : 693 Demand ; ' 694 818 1,804 308 483 Summer 1,389 588 715 1,624 6247 53 1,076 Winter 41,,227 78 1,280 1,633 3,328 653 a.a Total 30,000 Energy : 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 94,780 204,776 ,a Block 1 282,261 687,292 251,375 832,088 17,800 Block 2 748,688 236,902 309,899 Block 3 1,084,962 197,058 142,380 486,160 1,863,640 462,960 822656.6 l'249.360 61,4 36,3 61.9 Total 5.8 69.7 60.3 Load Factor•% 4 , UNIT RATES 000000 DMU Proposed IS : 60.000000 60.000000 60.000000 8,000000 Customer Charge 80.000000 80.000000 9.000000 9.000000 9.000000 9 9. Demand Charge 9.000000 0,013000 0.013000 0.013000 0.013000 ' 0,013000 0.013000 0,013000017000 0,017000 0.017000 0,017000 Energy Charge 0,017000 0.017000 0. Fuel Charge TU Existing GP : 16.000000 16.000000 15.000000 Customer Charge 16.000000 16,000000 16.000000 Demand Charge 0000000 0,000000 0,000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 First 10 kW 6.800000 6,800000 6.800000 6,800090 8,800000 8.800000 over 10 kW 0.066100 Energy Charge 01068100 0.068100 0.068100 0.028900 ~ Block 1 0.068100 0.068100 0.028900 0.028900 0.028900 Block 2 0.028900 5600 0.006600 0.006500 0.006600 0,006600 Block 3 0.006500 0.00 0.018990 0.018990 0,018990 0,018990 0.018990 0.018900 Fuel Charge DC Existing IS t 26.000000 26,000000 Customer Charge 26,000000 26,000000 26.000000 26.000000 60000 360000 ,280000 Demand Charge 0,360000 9,360000 9.350000 9.360000 9. 8 Summer 8.260000 8,280000 8.260000 08,.280000033723 8,260000 0.033723 0,03373 0,033723 Winter 8. Energy Charge 0.033723 0.033723 Fuel Charge (0.005000) (0.005000) (0.006000) (0.006000) (0005000) (000600 REVENUES : ?3,826 10,335 27,341 104,334 27,948 36,07.1 9 988 24,989 DMU•Erletise 96,128 25,949 33,182 68'163 16,347 24,898 DMU•istind 26,308 33,148 67,852 23,798 ExiAistixtg g 9301,,127 01,767 24,762 31,7'26 66,641 9,291 DC-Ex{ (3B8) DIFFERENCE : (6,672) (9,20 (2,000) 601 (379) 2,001 1 (369} 34 (2,353) Exist vs. Prop (2,889) 9'2 i Proposed vs. TU 1,191 1,187 1,467 2,612 877 Proposed vs. DC 3,381 * Demand values do not include ratchet levels for TU and DC. 1 h r k iR DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES # COMPARISON OF GP RATE WITH INDUSTRIAL RATE Schedule K-2,I 7 8 9 C.S. APTS 4•u USAGE : EMC MITCHELL 1U 11 Demand : • TR---- -N~_ TOTAL Gp Summer 1,338 Winter ],063 11769 690 4,036 Total 1,870 688 14,427 Energy: 2,381 3,629 1256 3,804 12,617 11 Block 1 7,640 28,944 Block 2 30,000 30,000 301000 30,000 Block 3 428,070 838,630 234,950 30,000 816,170 1,032,190 267,290 1,320,400 Total 4,776,648 650 Load Factor•% 10074,240 1,700,720 522,240 97, 1,447,950 4,496,162 81,6 64.2 67,0 9,301,700 UNIT p ♦TE,.J 26.0 47.3 + a T +11SO DMU Proposed iS : a Demand eChar 80'000000 80,000000 60,000000 4 Energy charge 9.000000 9.000000 60.000000 0,013000 9,000000 9.000000 Fuel Charge 0.013000 0.013000 0.017000 0.017000 0.013000 by 0,017000 0.017000 TU Existing GP'- Customer Charge 16,000000 16,000000 F Demand Charge 16,000000 16,000000 ~ r First 10 kW 0,000000 Over 10 kW 0.000000 0.000000 0,000000 i Energy Charge 8'800000 8.600000 6,800000 6,800000 ' Block I 0.068100 Block 2 0.068100 0,058100 0.056100 Block 3 0,028900 0.028900 0.028900 0.028900 Fuel Charge 0.005500 0.006600 0.006500 0,006600 DC Existing iS 0.018990 0018990 0.018990 0.018990 Customer Charge 25.000000 26.000000 Demand Charge 25 000000 25,000000 Summer 9,360r0U Winter 9.35u000 8'28 9.350000 9,350000 Energy Charge 031000 8.280000 8.280000 8.260000 Fuel Charge .093723 0.033723 0.033723 0.033723 (0'005000) (0.006000) (0,005000) (0,005000) 1RF%VENUES ; DMU•Existing 69,797 DMU•Proposed 64,466 3,069 30,128 116,729 TU. Existing '486 84,403 678,578 63,488 27,891 112,919 638 ;847 DC-Existing. 62,363 82,161 27,710 119,192 ,363 81,043 26,427 109,896 638.108 DIFFERENCE ; ,396 519,211 Exist vs. Prop (5,331) i 868 Prod vs, TU I1000 2'2) (2,938) (2,810) (41,729) Proposed vs. DC 2,103 (19) (8,273) (10351) 3,860 1,284 3,629 * Demand valUse do not include ratchet levels for TU and Dc,~82 1 1 I tf DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Schedule K-2.1 COMPARISON OF GP RATE WITH INDUSTRIAL RATE { 7 8 9 10 11 C.S. APTS EMC MITCHELL TRINITY TOTAL GP USAGE; Demand : ' Summer 1,338 1,769 690 4,036 14,427 Winter 1,063 1,870 686 3,604 12,617 Total 2,391 3,629 1,268 7,640 26,944 Energy Block 1 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Block 2 428,070 638,630 234,960 1,320,400 4,776,648 Block 3 616,170 1,032,190 267,290 97,660 4,496,162 Total 1,074,240 1,700,720 622,240 1,447,960 9,301,700 Load Factor•% 61.6 64.2 67.0 26.0 47.3 UNIT RATES : DMU Proposed IS : Customer Charge 60,000000 60.000000 60.000000 60.000000 Demand Charge 91000000 9.000000 9.000000 9.000000 Energy Charge 0.013000 0.013000 0.013000 0.013000 Fuel Charge 0.017000 0.017000 0.017000 0.017000 TU Existing GP : Customer Charge 16.000000 16.000000 16.000000 16.000000 Demand Charge First 1,0 kW 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Over 10 kW 6.800000 6.800000 6.800000 6.800000 Energy Charge Block 1 0.066100 0.066100 0.066100 0.066100 Block 2 0.028900 0.028900 0.028900 0.028900 Block 3 0.006600 0.006600 0.006600 0.006600 Fuel Charge 0.018990 01018990 0.018990 0.018990 DC Existing IS : Customer Charge 26.000000 26.000000 26.000000 26.000000 Demand Charge Summer 9.360000 9.360000 9.360000 9.360000 Winter 8.260000 8.260000 8.260000 8.260000 Energy Charge 0.033723 0.033723 0.033723 0.033723 Fuel Charge (0.006000) (0.006000) (0.006000) (0.006000) REVENUES : DMU-Bxisting 69,797 93,069 30,128 116,729 678,676 DMU•Proposed 64,466 84,403 27,691 112,919 636,847 " TU•Existing 63,466 82,161 27,710 119,192 638,198 DC-Existing 62,363 81,043 26,427 109,396 616,211 DIFFERENCE; Exist vs, Prop (6,331) (8,666) (2,436) (2,810) (41,729) Proposed vs. TU 1,000 2,261 (19) (6,273) (1,361) Proposed vs, DC 2,103 3,380 1,264 3,623 20,636 Demand values do not include ratchet levels for TU and DC. 2 s } +i DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES S,-,hudule K-3.0 COMPARISON OF LP RATE WITH INDUSTRIAL RATE 4v ~ 1 2 3 4 b 6 ACME MALL ST. SCHOOL FEM MORRISON PETERBIJILT USAGE: Demand : ' Summer 13,020 13,680 13,461 1,353 f+,470 32,368 Winter 13,272 10,744 10,101 11353 8,673 27,384 Total 26,292 24,424 23,562 2,706 17,143 69,752 Energy : Block 1 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Block 2 4,491,240 4,173,680 4,027,226 481,620 2,936,910 14,179,440 Block 3 4,300,860 5,314,320 6,226,476 898,320 4,968,090 14,626,660 Total 8,822,100 9,618,000 10,283,700 1,409,940 7,924,000 21:,836,000 Load Factor-% 46.0 63.4 69.8 71.4 63.3 68.9 i , UNIT RATES : DMU Proposed IS Customer Charge 60.000000 60.000000 40.000000 60.000000 60.000000 60.000000 Demand Charge 9.000000 9.000000 9.000000 9.000000 9.000000 9.000000 Energy Charge 0.011000 0.011000 0.011000 0.011000 0.011000 0.011000 Fuel Charge 0.017000 0.017000 0.017000 0.017000 0.017000 01017000 ~ V { TU Existing GP Customer Charge 15.000000 16.000000 15.000000 16.000000 16.000000 16.000000 Demand Charge First 10 kW 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000OOC 0.000000 0.000000 Over 10 kW 6.800000 6.800000 6.800000 6.800000 01800000 6.800000 Energy Charge Block 1 0.056100 01056100 0.066100 0.066100 0.056100 0.066100 Block 2 0.028900 0.028900 0.028900 0.028900 0.028900 0.028900 Block 3 0.005600 0.005000 01005600 0.006600 0.005600 0.005600 Fuel Charge 01018990 0.018990 0.018990 0.018990 0.0?.8990 0.018990 DC Existing IS : Customer Charge 26.000000 26.000000 26.000000 26.000000 25.000000 26.000000 Demand Charge Summer 9.350000 91360000 9.350000 0.360000 9.350000 9.350000 Winter 8,260000 8.260000 8.260000 8.260000 8.260000 8,260000 Energy Charge 0.033723 0.033723 0.033723 0.033723 0.033723 0.033723 Fuel Charge (0.006000) (0.006000) (0.005000) (0.005000) (0.005000) (0.005000) REVENUES r DMU•Existing 507,304 611,787 627,469 68,218 397,481 1,298,470 DMU•Proposed 484,367 487,040 600,722 64,662 376,879 1,233,896 TU•Existing 500,816 497,725 507,188 65,082 380,213 1,2153,628 DC-Existing 486,061 490,339 604,973 64,624 378,735 1,242,497 DIFFERENCE : Exist vs, Prop (22,937) (24,747) (26,738) (31666) (20,602) (64,674) Proposed vs, TU (16,449) (10,685) (6,467) (630) (3,334) (19,732) Proposed vs. DC (694) (3,299) (4,262) (72) (11866) (8,601) * Demand values do not include ratchet levels for TU and DC, 1 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Schedule K-3.1 COMPARISON OF LP RATE WITH INDUSTRIAL RATE F+ 7 8 9 10 11 12 TETRA PAK T.I. TWU #1 TWU #2 UNT #1 UNT #1 , USAGE: Demand : ` Summer 21,168 14,087 17,948 17,283 47,292 39,664 t,s Winter 23,772 11,316 16,092 14,156 42,924 36,280 Total 44,940 25,402 33,040 31,438 90,218 74,844 Energy : Block 1 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Block 2 7,661,400 4,339,872 6,838,400 6,366,060 15,368,320 12,746,080 Block 3 15,065,800 8,406,628 7,628,800 10,204,140 26,746,080 24,604,920 rp i Total 22,747,200 12,776,400 13,297,200 15,600,200 42,134,400 37,380,000 Load Factor-% 693 68.9 65.1 68.0 84,0 68.4 i UNIT RATES : DMU Proposed IS: Customer Charge 60,000000 60,000000 60.000000 60.000000 60.000000 80.000000 Demand Charge 9.000000 9,000000 9.000000 9.000000 91000000 9.000000 Energy Charge 0.011000 0.011000 0,011000 01011000 0.011000 0.011000 Fuel Charge 0.017000 0,017000 0.017000 0.017000 0.017000 01017000 I TU Existing GP ; Customer Charge 16.000000 16.000000 16.000000 16.000000 16.000000 16.000000 Demand Charge First 10 kW 0.000000 01000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 01000000 over 10 kW 6.800000 61800000 6.800000 6,800000 61800000 61800000 Energy Charge l Block 1 0.066100 0.056100 0.056100 0.066100 0.066100 0.068100 Block 2 0.028900 0.028900 0.028900 0.028900 0.028900 0.028900 Block 3 0.005500 0.006600 0.006500 0.006600 0.006600 0,006500 Fuel Charge 0.018990 0.018990 0.018980 0.018990 01018990 0.018990 DC Existing 18: Customer Charge 25.000000 25.000000 26,000000 26.000000 26.000000 26.000000 Demand Charge Summer 91360000 9,360000 9.360000 9.360000 9.360000 9.360000 Winter 8.260000 8.260000 8,280000 8.260000 8,260000 8.260000 Energy Charge 0.033723 0,033728 0.033723 0.033723 0,033723 0.033723 Fuel Charge (0,006000) (0,005000) (0.006000) (0.005000) (0.006000) (0.006000) REVENUES: DMU•Existing 1,101,244 620,296 704,974 761,028 2,101,977 1,818,144 DMU•Proposed 1,042,102 687,077 670,402 720,488 1,992,427 1,720,966 TU-Exlsting 1,042,830 688,063 683,141 722,276 2,006,607 1,723,492 DC-Existing 1,047,946 692,452 674,709 726,901 2,007,269 11736,302 DIFFERENCE: Exist vs. Prop (69,143) (33,219) (34,673) (40,661) (109,649) (97,188) Proposed vs. TU (728) (985) (12,739) (11808) (13,180) (2,636) Proposed vs, DC (5,844) (61376) (4,308) (6,433) (14,832) (14,346) * Demand values do not include ratchet levels for TU and DC, 2 r DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES $clledule K-3.2 (r COMPARISON OF LP RATE WITH INDUSTRIAL RATE 13 14 16 16 17 USAGE: VICTOR WATER LAKE LALLAS SEWER TOTAL LP t,e Demand;' Summer 13,692 6,218 6,676 6,268 271,638 Winter 11,660 6,466 6,000 6,267 242,338 Total 26,242 11,684 12,676 10,616 613,876 Energy : Block 1 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 490,000 Block2 4,312,740 2,008,424 2,176,976 1,809,082 87,704,469 Block 3 4,127,280 2,360,376 2,066,824 4,602,038 142,127,391 Total 8,470,000 4,398,800 4,272,800 6,441,120 230,311,860 Load Factor.% 46.0 61.6 46.2 83.9 61,4 UNIT RATES : DMU Proposed IS : Customer Charge 60.OC(J00 60.000000 60.000000 60.000000 60.000000 Demand Charge 9.000000 9.000000 91000000 9.000000 9.000000 Energy Charge 0.011000 O.Ui +^0 0.011000 0.011000 0.011000 Fuel Charge 0.017000 0.017000 0.017000 0.017000 0.017000 TU ''-dating GP Customer Charge 16.000000 16,000000 16.000000 16.000000 16.000000 Demand Charge First 10 kW 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 01000000 Over 10 kW 6.800000 61800000 61800000 61800000 6.800000 Energy Charge Block 1 0.066100 0.066100 0.066100 0.066100 0.066100 Block 2 0.028900 0,028900 01028900 0,028900 0.028900 Block 3 01006600 0.006600 0.006600 0.006600 0.006600 Fuel Charge 0.018990 0.018990 0.018990 01018990 01018990 DC Existing 19 Customer Charge 26.000000 26.000000 26.000000 26.000000 26.000000 Demand Charge Summer 9.360000 9.360000 9.360000 9.360000 9.360000 Winter 8,280000 8.260000 8,260000 8.260000 8.260000 Energy Charge 0.033723 0.033723 0.033723 0.033723 0.033723 Fuel Charge (01006000) (0.006000) (0,006000) M006000) (0.006000) REVENUES; DMII-Existing 487,080 240,479 246,662 292,463 11,683,947 DMU-Proposed 466,068 229,042 234,442 276,706 11,086,136 TU-Existing 480,876 236,067 242,638 272,460 11,201,091 DC-Existing 467,007 229,934 236,008 277,893 11,160,640 DIFFERENCE; Exist vs. Prop (22,022) (11,437) (11,109) (16,747) (698,811) Proposed vs. TU (16,818) (61016) (8,196) 3,247 (116,966) Proposed vs. DC (1,949) (892) (660) (2,187) (76,604) * Demand values do not include ratchet levels for TU and DC. 3 a TAM 900 O#AW l vri DINTON MUNICIPAL, UTILITIES DEVEL(AMEN'.T OF INDUSTRIAL RATE COST DIFFEWNTIALS Primary Loss Difference 1. IMPA Demand Charges 219550,300 2. TMPA Energy Charges 10,233,250 3. Total TMPA Cost of Service 315783,550 4. Energy Purchases - MWh 857,049 5. Average IMPA Cost per MWh 37.08 6. Primary Loss Differential 2.00% 7. Primary Cost Differential - $/MWh 0.74 Transformer Ownership Difference 8. Indust. Transfooer Related Expenses 2589640 9. Industrial Energy Sales - w/o LP 1290498 n 10. Transformer Ownership Cost Diff. - $/MWh 2.00 Q. c ..J ro I ~ i 0 DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DEVELOPMENT OF RESIDENTIAL TIME•OF•USE RATE Energy Distribution n 1, Summer MWh Salta (June through September) 125,470 2. Pinter 40 Selma (October through May) 139,292 3. Total MM Sales 264;%2 4. On-Peak " Sales (S:ammr • 30%) 37,701 Customer Charge Deve(opeent : S. Customer charge cost of Service 7.92 6. Addltionat Meter cost 7.31 a 7 0 Total Customer , lpha$0 CwtomerCCChharge (Rvgnded) 15.23 9. 30:84 Customer Charge (Rounded) 15,00 20.00 Off-Peak Energy Char pt Development 10. System Demand Cost of Gervlce 4,448,799 11. Energy Coat of Service • 3,751,703 12. Total Off-Peak Energy Cost 9,200,502 13 Total Residential MWh Sales (Line 3) 20,952 14, Off-Ptak Energy cost per kA 15. Off-Peak Energy Cost per kWh (Rounded) 31.90 16. Lees : E.C.A. Charge MOO 17. Off-peak Energy Charge 14.00 18, Energy Dtsen~d Costl of Service 19. On-Peak Residentfal "A Sates (Line 4) 8 837 70} 20. On-Peak Energy Cost per MW 37701 21. Off-Peek Energy Cost per MWh (Line 14) 30.95 22. Total On-Peak Energy Charge par kWh 264.85 23. Total on-Peak Energy Charge per kWh (Rounded) 265,00 24. Less I E.C.A. Charge 17.00 i5. On-Peak Energy Charge 27,E r Energy Cost reduced by required rate reduction N n rD CL c rn 7- H N „ar+lM ueea" WAR too" x*0"e j DENTON MUMICIPAL UTILITIES DEVELOPMENT OF DEMAND TIME OF USE RATES (a) (b) (c) GSS GSL Average Customer Charge Development n 1. Customer Cost of Service • $/Month 19.03 36.02 2. Additional Meter Cost • S/Month 7,31 7,31 3. Total Customer Cost of Service . S/Month 26.34 43.33 4. Customer Charge - S/Cu:etomer/Month (Rounded) 26.00 43.00 On-Peak Charge Development n 5. Purchased Demand cost SAW 10.81 10.81 6. Coincidence Factor • X 90.00 90.00 7. Purchased Demand Cost of Service • S/kL 9.73 9.73 B, On-Peak Demand Charge . S/kW (Rounded) 19.00 10.00 10.00 System Demand Charge Development : 9. System Demand Expenses S 3,221,688 987,005 4,208,693 10. Lose t Cost transferred to Energy • S 991,288 123,405 11114,693 11. System Demand Expenses Adjusted . S 2,230,400 863,600 3,094,000 t2. Billing Demand . k4 557 600 215 900 773 500 13 System Demand Cost - S/kM 4.00 4.00 4.00 14. System Demand Charge - SAW (Rounded) 4.00 4.00 4.00 Energy Charge Development : 15. Energy Expenses - $ 2,780,889 1,514,368 4,295,257 16. Plus t System Demand Cost Transfer - S 991,288 123,405 1,114,693 17, Energy E ee • Adjusted • S 3:M: 177 1,637,773 5,409,950 18. Energy Sales • MA 160 889 89 611 250 500 19. Energy Cost of Service • S/MNh A.45 16.28 21.60 20. Energy Cat of Service • S/Mlih (Rounded) 23.00 18.00 22.00 21, Less I E.C.A. Charge S/Mlih 17.00 17.00 17.00 22, Energy Charge • S/Mfi 6.00 1.00 5.00 n n 7 fD CL c J ro r u H 1 N r' a swm OEVELOOPRENT OFN TMPA A PEAK (DEMAND RATE \ Pr imary Oec(b) 1. TMPA Facflftfes Charge 2• TMPA Coverage Return Z9,967,230 29 967 230 (6,101,870) (6, 01,870) 3. Net TWA Capacity Cost 23 865 360 23 4. FY93 DMU Peak Ovond•kW 195, ,865,360 ,000 195,000 5. TMPA FINed Cost per kW/Year 122.39 122.39 6• Tina Loss Factor 1104 1.06 7. Peek Deaynd Rate par kW/Year , 127.28 129.77 8. Peak Deamxt Rate per kW/Month 10.61 f 0,81 N n rD ro a c rD r i w rY Section M I PROPOSED RATE SCHEDULES f.. 1 fa 0 r f! ]y fa ~e lsStii7:. (1 (I''7 I~ I:,r I I 1. ar I i i