Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-15-1992 ;I Agenda►terr+ AGENDA tote - CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL December 15, 1992 Work Session of the City of Denton C+.ty Council on Tuesday, December 15, 1992 at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: NOTE: Any item listed on the Agenda for the work Session may also be considered as part of the Agenda for the Regular Session. a ~ 5:15 p.m. 1. Executive Session: A. Legal Platters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Consider action in Sni v Citty. i consider action in airport condemnation cases. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Consider an appointment to the Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission. 2. Receive an update and hold a discussion regarding community Development activities. 3. Receiv~a an update and ho).d a discussion regarding the broadcast of City council meetings and the sharing of broadcast equipment with the Denton Independent School District and give staff direction. 4. Receive an update and hold a discussion regarding the civic Center Pool renovation project. p.m. in Denton City n Council the CouuChambersTuesday, Regular Meeting 192 of at9:OO City of of December 15, City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: 7;00 p.m. 1. Pledge of Alloe4iance 2 ,nf.mber 17,, 1992 and the meeting of November u 24, 1992. of I r n raw }j J 5 9~ City of Denton Council Agenda MIN a2~4i December 15, 1992 Page 2 i 3. Presentation of the National Leagub of Cities 1992 City Innovation Award for the Community Oriented Policing Services Program for the City of Denton. 4. Public Hearings : A. Hold a public hearing and consider the preliminary and final replats of Lot 2, Block 1, of the Off _.sbacke;- Addition, plus .135 acres of unplatted land; into Lot 2R, Block 1. The .4-acre site is on the east side of Carroll Blvd., approximately 148 feet south of W. Prairie Street. (The Planning and zoning 0ommission recommended approval with conditions, 5-0, at its December 2, 1992 meeting.) 5. Consent Agenda Each of these items is recommended by the staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. F Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. Listed below are bids and purchases orders to be approved for payment under the ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back- up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 6.A, 6.B). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss or withdraw an item prior to approval of the Consent Agenda. Upon the receipt of a "request to speak" form from a citizen regarding an item on the Consent Agenda, the item shall be removed and be considered before approval of the Consent Agenda, A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid #1431 -CIP Improvements Project Phase I Stuart Road Sanitary & Storm Water Sewer Upgrade 2. Bid #1435 -Test and Inspect Wood Utility Poles 3. Bid #1441 -800 HP 3-Phase induction Motor 4. Bid #1446 -Trees Container Grown 6. Ordinances A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and awarding a contract for purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services, (5,A.2, - Bid #.435, 5.A.3, - Did #1441, 5.A.4. - Bid ;x1446) I` av 1 C. .l r. F e p "rina No UNR(}8 OR1_ City of Denton Council Agenda December 15, 1992 Page 3 4 , B. consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. (5.A.1. - Bid #1431) C. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending provisions of ordinance No. 92-172 providing for changes in the schedule of rates for electric service by amending the Electric General Service Small (GSS) rate. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) D. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending the 1992-93 budget of the City of Denton by appropriating the sum of fifteen thousand and four hundred and eleven dollars ($15,411) from the unappropriated balance of the Recreation Fund to various accounts in the Recreation Fund to provide for funds for a recreation leader. E. Consider adoption of an ordinance directing the publication of notice of intention to issue Certificates of Obligation of the City of Denton. F. Considei adoption of an ordinance accepting a donation of 5.92 acres out of the Robert Beaumont Survey from Barworth corporation (Grantor) to the city of Denton to be utilized in expanding the North Lakes Pr,rkj providing certain conditions are net by Grantor] and providing credit to Grantor from future dedications required of Grantor for park land on property adjacent to the donated tract. 7. Resolutions A. Consider. approval of a resolution supporting tho efforts of the Dallas Fort Worth Airport Board t•:) obtain legislation affirming the authority of the Poare, over the activities of the Dallas Fort Worth Airport. B. consider approval of a resolution supporting the funding of Douse Bill 791 providing for a statewide: system of poison control centers. C. Consider approval of a resolution adopting the Harassment Prevention Policy (108,10). 8. Consider a motion for the Denton City Council to officially adopt-a-spot located on both sides of Bell Avenue between Robertson Street and Eagle Drive. 9. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. f 1 ~uendl~ No. 9a -p ,3 City of Denton council Agenda ff~~ December 15, 1992 T T Page 4 i 10. Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate I C. Personnel D. Board Appointments + 11. New Business This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 12. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. NOTE: THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE FIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT IS LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE. C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the _.day of 1992 at o'clock (a.m.) . CITY SECRETARY NOTE: THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IS ACCESSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE IIEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS 1N ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 566-8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX SO THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE. ACCOOODI l r. :CITY FIR— COUNCIL ; r T TT 1 .71 :1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - ooO0o~000 ° ~ ~ 06" 4 0 C - ' ~ G Z Oq O - O U d 02 O ~~O00oonnacndoo°°~~ T, TT: t : . "Y 1 j A W DATE: DO embev- 47 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT! i TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJ: Update on Community Development acstivities. RECOMMXNDATION: N/A BACKGROUND: In June of 1992 City Council approved the 1992 Final Statement of Community Development Obje0tJ.V*0 and Projected Use of Funds. Several ongoing programs/ projects were continued and new projects authorised under the Final Statement. The Community Development office is also working on some special projects which do not fall under any of the currently funded Federal or State programs. SUMMARYi council will bo briefed on the following activities: 1) Performanoa on 1991 activities. 2) Current year CVSG & rental activities. 3) Crawford Building Elderly project. Not-for-profit housing development corporation. 5) Human Services activities. 6) Fair Housing 7) Summary of recent federal legislation and outlook for the future. PROGRAM6. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED All community Development activities are carried out with assistance from various non-profit organizations, other City Departments, neighborhood groups, local property owners, local businesses and independent contractors. rjXUrja No ...:P..2._ t FISCAL IMPACTS OWlaaISAm ' Community Development, legislation, recently algae into law by President Bush, will increase the ity of Denton's 1993 CDBa allocation by five to eight 4 percent. The increase could be as much am $500000 from $675,000 this year to $725,000 for 1993. Legislation also reinstated the match requirement ~ for HOME program funding. If Denton wishes to participate in the HOME program the match requirement for 1993 funds must be met. ae p fully myi itte s -'lo d V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: Barbara Ross Community Development Administrator App oveds rank Rob ins AICP Executive Director for Planning i Development A CCRPUPDA.DIS c l V v. `k 4 d~Rltda Iterrt__L 7 U.S. Dapertmerd of Housing Grantee Performance Report and Urban Development Community Dawfopman L~ '1 f Block Omni Program OMB Approve) No, M 0077 (esp. Y31N0) 1 h, dWrbe i ,M Nwhew si1Y (1F 1),~,[J,T(1N Ii_gl _Mf'»GA~QQ~fj L 6nIwr AAAwr ~ a /r,aa eM an bN nnl,wr ~elaM ►M r.ya1 215 E. MCKINNEiY BARBARA ROSS DENTON, TEXAS 76201 a r~.Ne ar+Nra« (817) 383-7726 1. This repent omelsts of rho Wowing loans of owJrg progress ichloved through (dolt) i July 31 , 1991 it, Activity summary. knn HUD-4049,2. b, Stank of Funds • part I WW Part II, form HUD.4040.3, o. Lowl Mod Benefit Werkshael, Form HUD-/049,30. J. status of Funds • Pan III, form 40/9.4, e. Dlreol Bsnsfil Ad"s1, Form HUD-4919.9. 1. Actions toAfMnatroly Furrier Fair Housng, form HUD-4049,6. 9, DISplatiorriont, I" HUD-411149-7. See HUD handbook 115101, '£nOWment Oanloo pOAortnanw Report Instrucdont' lor guldvoo on completing the OPq. 7, TMa repeH oleo ehentelnai a, Assassmsnts by the gransoe of the refadonshlp of the use of Comrnunlly Deyekpmsnl Block Ororf (0090) hinds to: (1) bady nal Ob aemmudty developmento achIves 12) NlmMaalMel~sfobmho bRghl rtt/N OD80 havinsop as par"Ueu4inuot r urperthe,oylben~ail kw+ and nwdrroM ktooms parsons, 0kf In the prowndon or 1 (0) e,o primary Objective who requires that In dhs aggregate Al )SAM W percent of ON COBO funds expoodsd during fie one, two or dyee coneewtiys 1 program ysare spedl4sd by be grantee In its osrd9caiti rt will be lot actiykles which benefit low and moderato Income persons; b. Desaiplkns of; (1) dw nukes of and reasons for changes In she gronsoe't progrenh objectives; and (2)-how the gransos would charge its program as a rasult of No eryarlerref; o. Surfmory of ;hay commtnls rsWvod by the grantee on Ns program from ctisens In its jurisdiction. 1, The grsntss'e sufherised Official Aspresentstlv0 artl9es thsu a, This hill contalm ON items Identined In Items 0 and 7 aboys. b. To the betl of Jilt f her knowledge and belief the dolt In dos report to Km and corrocl is of this dots In Isom 6. e. Federal assitltna mods available under the Community Dovoopmenl Okdh Grant (CDBO) Program has not been ufllred to raduoo substentlatly tiho - anhouM of foal financial support fox community dawiol l acllvttias below the I" of such support prior to the soars of ilrs most recently comptetod CO so program year. Wsrningi 6sellon 1001 of T111e 46 of sow United Slow Coda (Crlmlnaf Cede and Comfnr7 f ronadurrJ shell apply to she lorageing aNHlcotlon. Title 10 provides, tmorhg ether things, that whowsr, knewlrply and wtlifuliy makes at uses a dooumenl of wrlHng sonlalning eny false, Ihlhlous, or freudulenl slttenenl of entry, to any monor wilco" the lurlWktlon of any depanmenl or agency of the United $lot", shall be Onsd net more than 019,000 or knprisoned not mess than Aw years, of kolfh, i; ~irra aii-+w a'2n Ti a~dF~aG~T91iSiTl~rwn~iv-"` LLOYD V'..11 RRELL, CITY MANAGE'sR - r0. Yenrui~ 11. dN Aeltln As re ord lob l tow M. 24 CFA part 510 and handbook 65101 Prev'xws widen h oWolete t q AgertddNU~..~ ..4 AgendalPeat.,..L/L`s j?....~ 1992 GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT 5l ~a5 NARRATIVE 7. This report also contains: i a. Assessments by the grantee of the relationship of the use of Community Development mock Grant (CDBG) funds to: 1. locally identified community development objectives; Each spring the City of Denton's Community Development Block Grant Committee sets up a minimum of two public hearings. These hearing are designed to gain input from citizens who reside within targeted areas regarding their recommendations for use of CDBG dollars. Community Development staff are present in order to provide information on current programs and projected funding levels. The input provided at the public hearings is often used as the basis for development of new programs and policies. Comments on existing programs also provide insight as to whether continuation of the programs would be supported by the neighborhoods which they serve. Each public hearing includes a presentation on eligible activities by the CDBG Committee Chairperson. The flow of this information to the public consistently generates discussion on potential projects. Some of the specific comments from the 1991 public hearings are described below: 1. One individual inquired as to the status of the Urban Homesteading Program. A 2. The same individual asked about completion of the Alexander St. Drainage project. 3. Several comments were received regarding the poor attendance at the Martin Luther King Jr. After school Action site program. 4. Sevotal citizens voiced support for the Housing Rehabilitation Program. 5. After otaff described the possibility of implementation of a new program to assist potential home buyers, support was voiced for the proposed program. 6. The Executive Director of the Denton Housing Authority described a new health rare clinic for which they would request CDBG funding. support was voiced for the proposed clinic. ti fs Agenda Item- CAS +~o2 1991 Grantee Performance Report b/o7J~ Narrative !/i1 Page 2 t Several funding decisions were made as a direct result of input from the public hearings. Community Development discussed the existing afterschool program at the MLK Center. It was determined that the center supervisor would develop a new program, less structured ' in terms of attendance requirements but, with more activities and the ability to serve more children. This new program was supported by the CDBG committee, The program has been successful and will continue with CDBG funding during the next program year. The Housing Rehabilitation Program was continued with approximately $300,000 in additional funding. The Homebuyer's Assistance Program was implemented during the summer and has been an instant success. It is obvious that there was a great need for a program of this type. ~ The Alexander St. Drainage project was discussed but it was determined that other projects were more pressing and that the request for funding the project would be delayed one year. The Drainage project has been included in the 1992 Final Statement. The TWU Cares Clinic located at the Denton Housing Authority's Phoenix Apartment complex was funded. The Clinic served over 11000 persons during the past year, Funding for the Clinic will continue in 192. These are examples of how locally identified community development objectives are included in the program of services under the CDBG program. The public hearing process in Denton has always been a cooperative and positive effort and will continue to be expanded as participation warrants. On an annual basis each City Department is advised of the upcoming allocation of CDBG funds. They are requested to provide information on potential projects that meet the program requirements. In this way, C.D. staff are able to obtain additional information regarding needs in low income areas that may not be brought out in the public hearings. Utilities, Engineering and Parks and Recreation are three areas where citizens who do not necessarily attend public hearings and yet often provide input on perceived needs to departmental staff members. Because the City staff obviously has opportunity to hear requests from citizens regarding other needs in the community that may not be voiced at a public hearing, their recommendations are generally supported by the CDBG Committee, Coda Enforcement activities are always a concern of citizens, especially those in the k 1991 Grantee Performance Report Narrative Page 3 lower income areas where properties may not be maintained as well as in some other areas. For this reason Community Development has remained active in the i cede -enforcement area, specifically through the Demolition Program. Even though additional funding was not allocated in the 1991 FinAl Statement, the program continued with funding from previous years. Additional funds have been allocated to demolish substandard structures in 1992-193. ` The Eitgineering Department also pointed out that there was a need for sidewalks in an area near the public housing neighborhood and the MLK Jr. Recreation Center. Sidewalks constructed along Wilson Street would benefit children from the neighborhood who walked from MLK to nearby Fred Moore Park. They would be safer and the 1 proposed sidewalk would also provide accessibility for persons with disabilities. This project was included and although not completed during the 1.991 program year, Lhe sidewalks have now been constructed. Community Development staff believe that Denton has been successful in identifying needs from the community. Staff then investigates the issues surrounding the perceived need, the projected costs and any possible alternatives and then reports these to the CDBG Committee. It is impot-Lint to note that with the exception of citizens complaining that proposed street and drainage projects are not carried out in a timely manner, ,Mete have beeno W or complaints- re ardinq the proceps used to determine annua-1 allocation of =G u s. + 2. the National Objectives which require that each CDBO assisted activity must either benefit low and moderate income persons, aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight, or meet community needs having a particular urgencyt As is noted in the Activity Summary Form. Each of the 1991 CDBG activity, except the Demolition Program, met the National Objective of benefit to low and moderate (very low and low) income families. Denton is committed to spending the highest percentage possible to benefit this segment of our population. c n E ;t ~t Il ~t agenda It~►ri..~'x~. 1991 Grantee Pericrmance Report Narrative Page 4 + Several of the activities benefit low moderate households directly and are also generally carried out within areas that are low/very low income areas. The Housing Rehabilitation program is designed to assist any household in the city who meets income eligibility but with the exception of only a few projects, they have also been confined to census tracts that are included in the low/very,. low income target area. The Homebuyers Aagiatance Program is a low/very low income household benefit and yet, staff projecte that most or the homes purchased will be in the targeted areas. All public services with the exception of MLK Equipment provide a low/very low household benefit. Both clinics, the HOPE, Inc, office, the PAL gym and of course the MLK Jr. Kid Connection are also located in low/very low income areas, The MLK Equipment purchases benefited a low income area. The construction of sidewalks along Wilson Street will benefit that same area. Actually, even though the Demolition Program is classified on the GPR as a slum/blight activity, all properties cleared during the 1991 program year were located in a low income area or were owned by low/very low income households. Staff feels the Demolition Program should also be considered a low/very low income benefit activity. 3. the Primary objective which requires that in the aggregate at least 75% of all CDBG funds expended during the one, two or three consecutive program years specified by the grantee in its certification will be for activities whi,;h benefit low and moderate incomo persons; The Low/Mod genef_it Worksheet form shows that $315,793 was spent on activities benefiting low and very low income families, This represents 94% of all funds spent on artiv,fties other than program administration. Demolition is the only activity carried out by the City of Denton which cannot be classified i' as benefiting low and very low income families. A total of ;20,104 was expended for this activity. As previously mentie:iied the Demolition Progrr;m AgendaNe„~7 . Agendalten)~~ ~ 1991 Grantee Performance Report Narrative l/ Page 5 J also benefits low and very low income families because: 1) demolition activities have been carried out only in low/very low income areas and/or; 2) demolitions have been carried out on properties owned by low/very low income families. Denton is dedicated to providing the maximum low/very low benefit possible through the use of CDBG funds. h, 1. the nature of and reasons for changes in the grantee's program objectives; There have been no changes in the program's objectives over the past program year. All programs /projects are continuing and will be completed within the next 6 to 12 months. 2, how the grantee would change its program as a result of its experiences; The community Development Block Grant program of services has always been a positive experience for the community. With few exceptions most programs and projects have been carried out in an effective and efficient manner. 5ubrecipient contracts is one area in which there may be some future changes, Two of the agencies , funded during the 1991 program year have experienced delays in implementing their programs. As a result of these delays, both subrecipients must request an extension of their contract period. In the future, rather than limiting agency contracts to a 12 month period the Community Development staff may request that the Legal Department extend that to an 18 month period. This should give each agency sufficient time in which to expend all funds, even if delays occur. Also, when visited by HUD monitors, staff received several suggestions regarding how to increase efficiency and improve documentation in the Housing and Rental Rehabilitation programs, These minor changes include documentation of all construction monitoring visits and documenting the reason underlying all change orders, other similar changes may talte place as a result of the interaction between HUD staff i. b r. i. v 1 AAends Ne, w ya -a3 9 Agenda fteml~ 1991 Grantee Pe-fformance Report Narrative Page 6 and Denton's housing staff. Another a range which is soon to take place is simplification of the Homebuyer Assistance Program (HAP) application. The original application included a j all the information that would be required by a lending institution before approving a loan. Staff has noted that the information is not used to determine whether the client is a good risk for a Community Development HAP loan. Program policy simply stated is that if the client is approved for a loan by a legitimate banking or mortgage institution then they are also approved for the city's program. This policy then relieves Community Development staff of the task of approving potential loan recipients. The application will be changed in order to assess only the clients income eligibility for the program. C. Summary of any comments received by the grantee on its program from citizens in its jurisdiction. one comment by a citizen to the City Council last spring noted that the Wilson street S±.dewalk project was behind schedule. The citizen was concerned about the timeliness of all program projects. At that time the citizen also stated that he felt there was a great need for additional sidewalks to be built in the East Denton neighborhood. Other comments focus on the Housing Rehabilitation Program. After closeout on each project, clients are requested to complete a survey, The survey inquires as to the quality of the assistance they received from the Community Development staff as wel'. as the quality of the contractor's work. Some of the comments are listed below: "It's a wonderful program. our house neoda d the work done bad and we could never had it done, as we are completely disabled and could never afforded it. Thanks alot". "The only thing I do not like is the ;act my doorbell still does not work, and the type faucet put in the, bathroom. It still sprays and doesn't stay on right. My understanding these would be fixed. I also had the under- standing the extermination was good for awhile. \ for the ants, as that is the problem I had to,. c 0 i f yy 4. Agenda No._~s-- Agenda Item_-a-26 ...eL...... N18- .Z-9=_ 1991 Grantee Performance Report Id a5! Narrative Page 7 begin with not the termites. Now I understand it is only the termites". "Keep on keepin onl Wetre very grateful and appreciative - the house is much nicer to live + in". "It would be very nice to turn the garage into a den, or turn garage into a l,•edroom or fix concrete patios", v As is always the case, comments are generally positive regarding the program and the assistance received with some specific items on the particular pzoject that could have been done or improved upon. overall, staff feel the Housing Rehabilitation Program is one of Denton's biggest success stories. it consistently provides a quality product with efficient use of personnel and £undd. 1 t R C Grantee Performance Ae Orti u's'De"ertm"lofHouelna P end urban Der pgrl Activity Summary P cg p ram t OMB Apps 40. 2506.0077 (oxp, WVM) N"4(0 ew oerti rw.er v.+a ee..a 19171y / CITY OF DENTON B-91-MC-48-0036 Frem 08 O1 9L To OUML22 Cosa Amount [FW*4*d /Ir. IA• EVW~da TODW AeoomN~~n,~rnw d Ny Lwr g Th4 Eraerdod UY*16644 lk~ob,pae6 M~"bir Act#* NOR*. D,arlpdon and Loadan Mod q R M bDer Obrpmdaa BW~+a Coda o d • I p A I 1 k I 1 REHABILITATION 1.1 Single Family Residential: Nineteen homes have been of deferred forgivable loans to very rehabilitated during the low income families and 3% term loans 1991 fiscal year. :',arty (30) to low income families who meet other smoke detectors were eligibility criteria. Program is installed in the units. available city--wide. Program income $3,234 in residual M.K program is generated. CTs-204.0L, 204.02 funding was transferred for 204.03, 205.01, 205.02, 206.01, use in the program. There 206.02, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, was also a budget adjustment 213, 214. 100% low/very low income of $1,288 due to an error benefit. ' on the original budget. Program income is spent prior to any drawdown of federal funds. Expenditure of funds will continue. This program has been funded at varying levels for 8 years. d? 1986 Program Year Increment B/B 7 296039 B 1987 Program Year Increment 8/8 0 332300 121 A Some residual funds from the Smoke Detector Program }}((d~eer transferred to this re account. All funds wi be spent during the co vin year. P T" 0 121 716283391 M, -9 Wn fts record lx 3 Yyout "age a paged bim d ho-dboo Nto previous-eddon, are obdololo 1 6( rel. 21 CFR pert 570 and handbook 6510. tV 7~1 a t v. f H~ Grantee Performance Report U.B. Dpor"*M a I HouskV andUrbagpowbpnont 1r community ooWpn~n1 Activity Summary Bbd Grunt Ptogrran OMB Awwol No. 260"" (a*. "I=) M" Of a,wrw a,av ra.m.r Panad ca.;w CITY OF DENTON B-91-MC-48-0036 r 08 0 1 TO /7/11 /97 coed AYOA M re;Yr Ur- Emwkrd Taod Aoamp4~rtrnr'garua AdNry Ae v.,y Low "M TbW Exam UNi World IAxhl~ard Actoy Mntor Ackty Norm, Doom 00 rd LcmOm PvM Mod 0 Now P drq ra0av ObSpoopu eaWwa Cod» o b a d o 0 h I h M F Single family rehab continued: 1990 Program Year IncremeuL 8/9 17574 313162 0 -637 A Residual funds from other 1990 programs will be transferred to clear negative balance. 1991 Program Year Increment 8/9 80121 80121 487 230908 A Budget adjustment will be made to reflect actual 2 DEMOLITION program income. I 2.1 Clearance of vacant substandard a Eleven (11) properties were structures on a spot basis. ile.ared in Demolition Bids Structures were cleared for low and #18 and f19. very low income households and were in a low/very low income area, CTs - 212, 204.03, 213. 100% low very low income benefit. 1987 Program Year Increment 8/8 577 30505 0 0 B 1988 Program Year Increment 8/8 4491 15787 0 0 B $276 from this fund was transferred to the MLK 1989 Program Year Increment 8/8 M 15000 0 0 B Equipment account. 1990 Program Year Increment 8/9 14188 14188 627 185 A Program will continue with additional 1992 funding. t MOM ar aw dr s 275116 47476 ).1.14 30456'(1 S r f PnWku eftatd for 04014to Page 2 01 6 pages ror, to CPA ort 570 and hhan ~dbb*Oh 4310 2 ~r "0 e Urb Grantee Performance Report and nd Urbian DevabrveWpoeni ent o r Activity Summary 8boorr'tii nronM~ nlPro*gMn gram ONS Approve! No. ffiD6-0077 ($Xp, 3MINq GAIN K~ Paw owwal tbn M Orlew CITY OF AENTON B-91-MC-48-0036 From 08/01/91 To - 07/31/92 coedArrm" sAeJir. Ur. E*Ww68d Fort ~ Adolf Loav "M P4 E.; I Wk',iA,rd t 41, Ad*y d C~ AanrnpeaWwWSesw h ApMM AY"r, ona+ibn and uc+don l orded Abd ig R nq M DAN M 00014 a Poeow b e d e ! q h I k I 3 PUBLIC SERVICES 3.1 Purchase of equipment: Equipment 12/8-1 ob was purchased for the Martin Luther Ring Jr. Recreation Center. Items inclnde exercise equipment, ping pong tables, pool tables, etc for the center located at 1300 Wilson c1c. Serv.ce area includes CT - 212, i BGs - 2, 3, 4. Service area is 79% low/very low income. 1986 Program Year Increment 335 22457 0 93 B Equipment purchased are complete. Residual 2986 funds will be transferred for use in the Housing Rehabilitation Program. 1988 Program Year Increment 276 11599 0 0 B Equipment purchases complete. Expenditures from both 1986 and 988 accounts used to purchase lecterns for the center. ~Wy tt`` 1 v1 I t Mal low TOW ! 611 34056 0 X931 k k Berl NU0191P.2IsAd Re n tNI teowd fa J Years Page 3 of 6 P"es ~,A ro!. 2a CPp art 570 and har4book 6510. Previous edknr are oblNele a l 1 y ti'a s k _ zgw+~ayi. U,$, [*portmMl of Honing Grantee Performance Report ao mMyD PmOnl r ActIvIty Summary G1ooit&&n'Faognn, oIASADprawa) Ho.25OW77( M.ao+~ POW r~sf CITY OF DOTGN - - - - CM Amours r I.Ie1Yr, Un E,p.rb*6 Tool ugouldr+rd 1 A AadA?y loll gtrY~ ThM E NUOn 00*Ww swarm Godw V toss Aeh1b AcMV Nanr, onv4~ and Edon Furd0d Mod Nth R ~ro Nure« h 3 1 b b c d • 1 p - 1-192 rr F 3.2 MLR V4A Connection : Provision 8/9 c 6476 6476 0 8587 A Program for the 19in Ju school year ended in June t of afterschool care for children of Final payment for program low/very low income families. This has been requested. in a drop-in program at the Center Projected residual fimda located at 1300 Wilson St. CT-212, of ;1,500 will be transferred BGs-2,304. 1007 low/very low income for use iu another program. benefit. 42 children participated. 1 3.3 Police Athletic League: Program is 9/9 c 8788 11556 0 3011 D A fewitesedaYeTstillgto be pu. designed to curb delinquency and drug facility with boxing ring use through sports and cultural was set up during the activities. Program is available to program year. 55 children all children from Denton families participated in the \ 9 but is specifically ttrgeted to children from the public housing neighborhood. Thy YAL gym facility i located 607 E. Hickory Street. CT-21 Program providesl00r !Ow/very low 1. income benefit. A c 8167 0 A/ Contract period ends V ti 3,4 Prenatal Clinic: Funding for this 0/9 22571 22571 30, 1992. Clinic htr program pays a portion of the developed birthing r salary for a nurse-midwife to provide for low-risk deliveries t prenatal care to low income women in the Finer location. Ftt i Denton County- Facility is located a to continue under new a tact. 121 Finer St. Ct-207 260 women were assisted. 1007 low/very low income benefit. ar ~ r P" a! ~ P+9er rof. 24 CFR Dart 6m iod Nodboow 651U~2 ro~v pAUi~sdeonroorae ebidew G b ` r, w plftb"my ly U.S. DepaAm"t of SOWN Grantee Performance Report trd ur,tn D►vliown.ns r Community D•pp eni Activity Summary Dtad wantProgsm oMe ApprovJ tk. 2so6ao77 r•KP. 3131 roo aw MnOI PM46 C~01 Isl. or t» Flom To G 9 -OF DENTON cm Nnnn1 TOW W4 A 1. Lk. mp AC•Nry LOW P E ThiS Eb p+~d ~ I)r ~ Ced" FvWod told q Rt4erttq _ AaMry lLmt, D•evlp4ori t~d0n Pow n I I k b C d • I 0 1972 1972 22988 0 A The 3.5 HOPE, INC. Transitional Housing 10/91 c program has gotten off D to a sloe start but is Program: Provision of rent, mortgage currently assisting two utility assistance, budget and families. employment counseling to families at-risk of becoming homeless. No payments are made available directly to families but are paid to landlords and utility companies on behalf of the families. The office is located at 1213 N. Locust- CT-206.01. 100% low/very-10w income benefit. A Equipment purchases almost 3.6 TWU Cares: The Clinic located at 10/9 a 19248 19248 575 0 D complete. Clinic has served 1200 E Hickory provides medical 1063 patients in the screening and dental care to low last year. Clinic is income families. CDBG funds have located in the Phoenix Apts. been used to purchaso dental public housing neighborhood. equipment End supplies. CT-212 100% low/very low income benefit. 4 PUBLIC FACILITIES 6 IMPROVEMENTS 4.1 Wilson St. Sidewalks: Construction 5/9206 206 1290 14393 A Project is unde-l contra 9 To be completed by O f/3 of sidewalks on the norCh side of Residual funds will e,\ Wilson St. from Ruddell to Bradshaw. transferred for use co, CT-212, BGs-2,3,4. Service urea is another project. 79% low/very low income. 21425 21426 41641 14393 gj brm HUDd9102 (4!!1 ppt of D•0~ `r W. 24 CFA Don 670 and herObWk 6MO. Re W n INS t•ovd! for 3 r•~ 5 6 Pr•viout •ddont are obtd•I• N A A x "k, - r _ r R Grantee Performance Report us.D"ammentofHousing DeveWpmeni Activity Summary and Urban Dow"e t Common ty De Rram i r P rogram Bbdc Gram If OMB Aapwal No. 2606-0077 (eqr. "INO CITY OF DENTON B-91-MC-48•-0036 Fforn 08/01/91 To 07/31/92 ' COB6 Amourd WArr. ✓,Jr• Eapuved TOW AOddryNerv,DrarydonvdLoceim fold d Abd ip R"ne 10pWd M tid AomrnpkWmnvSmr eArnver E Period _ b o d o f p k i 1 k I r S OME OWNERSHIP ASSISTANCE.. 5.1 omebuyer Assistance Program: This /92 b 49 49 41 66366 A Program has only recently rogram provides down payment and Been implemented. Staff losing cost assistance to any family f s projecting 3-5 faml.lies hose annual income is 802 of median I ill be assisted by 10/01/92 ncome or less. Any home with a I 1 oat of $62,500 or less may be 1 urchased. CTs-204.01, 204.02, 204.03 05.01, 205.02, 206.01, 206.02, 207, 08, 209, 210, 311, 212, 213, 214. 1002 lov/ve low Income benefit. 5.2 rban Homesteading: Program to h 0 0 0 100000 A rogram in again on hold. Fundsi purchase HUD, VA and FHA foreclosures ill likely be transferred for sale to low/very low income or another use. residents. .y 6 MINISTRATION 121581 206132 972 34709 General management, oversight and I Fair Housing Program id Planning and Budgeting, Subrecipient monitoring. ~C I PAGE TOTALS 121630L06181 1013 201.075 1 ~ 457478 1405368 51935 457736 l~ P4WothsnemoNor ye.rr Pape 01 papas fI; brmHOD•AOe9.21d•861 Pro vbos edrion$ are obsdote 6 6 I!I ref. 24 CFA non 676 and fu MOook f 510.22 a i tie ^R 1 Grantee Performance Report U•5. Department of Housing & Urban Develnpm Rehabilitation Activities 0lllcaofCummuntly Planning andDevelop~a(!,o.P , Agenda ltem~`~ Public R- nfwrting Burden for Ihls collocllon of informatlan Is esllmal /a ~~1 AAProval No. 2506.0077 (axp.3+31 3 searching exlsltng data 6ourcus, gallwring and maintaining the dalq needed acct completing and a lewfng the collection of Inlolmallon. Send comp ants Suggestion$ po posse, Including the time for tevfawing In i cl regarding this burden o6tlmale or any other aspect of Ihls colfocllon of inlormalion, Induct to I1ro Olfico of Manegeroonl afnd Dudge paipohvorkdRoductlon ProJoc/(P606 ppj7) yye$ Up C 5l lot reducing limo burden, to uthe ,3 nopolls opmant, Washington, D.C. 2041(a 3f00; 0; and Name d e raMM and r 4eM Num6w Puled Cwued CITY OF DLNTON From All dranlees must submit this f6rm, whslher or not theY ho 'yo Cp'.' B-91-MC-48-0036 08/01/91 To 07/31/92 funded lehabllllellon program", Sinpfe Femlfy - Multifamily - " Aollvllles Activities ' - " (One Unit SlruelWea) (Two or lucre Unit Shuotures) I• Stalling Number of staff years (FTE staff years to lonlhs) ► 2, Actlvfty Delivery Costs From CDSO Funds - a. Staff costs s 33,626 - s b, other dirocl costs (do not Include In item 6, 7, or 8) - - $ 2,813 S 3. Pfe)0ats/Unlis RehoblllratedlCommllled a, ProJocls commilled (Multifamily only) ~f T " ~ - h, Unltacommfllud - - _ Units 4• Pro)eclslpnhs Rabebllileied/Completed 19 Unlit 77- - a, ProMcls completed (Aduhilamllyonty) - " - Pro)octs _ b. Units completed 5. Time Avoia oo weeks to co n Iola (Un- _lls i6i Slnple Family; Pro)ocrs 19 Unlte tJnlts - for Mulllfamlly p _---W --Weeks poi - 16 Unit Weeks par 6. Obllgellons; Amount obligated for ccm Project mlllmords W spoclllo rohablktatlon - Pfo)acts ham all sources (a i b + o below) r - - - - - _ i 219,099 s. CDBO funds obllgnled - s 219,099 $ h. Other Public (Federal, Slate, local fund 1 obllgnlod $ t. Prlvale Was obllgaled - _ $ 0 a 7, Unltgaldeled Obltgullons of End of year _ - $ 0 $ Expandllurea: Amounloxpandod for all comPlnlud proJacls from all 600rcas (e 4 b a c botow) 4 $ 219,099 ; a. CWG funds oxpnndod - $ 219,099 $ b. Other Pubflc (Fedeaal, Slnle, local) lands expended s _ 0 $ a. Pflvato funds expanded _ Check box only U grantee has no CDBO rehabllltellon activities - ' none none Forme u/ rnIY Individuals may copy Ihls lesson oftrco Cnpfors as nuodod. Previous l:ddtons aro 0bsololo - Ralaln Ihls record for 3 yoar4 7orur f{UD•49422A (05191 rob 24 CFR par 1570 and I landbook 651 0. - sr_ > {s , Agenda No. A-2:..42~L9 - GranteePeriormanceReport U.S.1JepsrlminloIHoueing Agenda Itern ~2& andUrbsnDevalopment Statuso(FUnds CommunllyDevopment D.~19_. "1 l ~~~aaeaae F. Parts f and it Block Grant Program 'i r or ua« OMB Approval No. 2506.0077 (exp. 3!31/90) ~a.ar+urtWr F'«bacw«w CITY ON DIi1iT411~.. _-_~JIi=91 -MC-48-0036 _ F1o1ri OS`D1~91 -To 7/31./92 PerlhSUmmeryofRuoureasandExpenditurea CDBO Funds 1, UnexpendedCDBB funds AI end of pravious reporting podod f 334,626 2, Additional CDBO funds received a, Entitbmanl Grant (IIUD•7082, line 6L) _ 617,568 b. Surplus from Urban 9enewsl / NDP Sel"meni (HUD-7082, kne 10b) - - - - - c. Loans guaranteed under Section 108 d. Program Income received during the program year (es shown In Status of Funds Pert 111, column f) - __je6R5 o, Return of grant funds ~ _ - 3, Total CDSO funds avallable lot use dudog thts reporting period (sum of linos I Ihru 20) 1, ToWI LOBO funds expnndad during tlrls reponing period ~ S 965,879------ a. a. Amount shown on Acfiviry Summary forms, column g 457 r ~478 _ b. CDBB funds used lot Section 108 payments - S _ 6, Unexpondod balance cl CDBO hinds al the end of ads ropontng period (Nne 3 minus hues 4o end 4b) _ ; utll:OvarallProgram nonethto owsn oderatoIIncomePetsons SRR .hl - A. Low/ Mo d Ben apt During this Reporl trig Period 4. a. Total CDBO funds expended (Isom line 4a above), except for Soc. 108 payments ; 457,~078 b. Los at Planning and program admfnisuallon costs (as shmvn VnAcuviry Summaryforms, column g) $ c, Note xpo ndilures subjecl to prugrem benefit calcuIsuon (lino 6a minus line 6b) r 7-Y n&tuttsbenefip - - - - 335,8'1Z pe rip bw a kl rnodarafe Income persons jas shown in l owJMod tlenoGl Vlorkaheci PertIV) _315,7_9_3 _ 1, Percent banal} to low end modorute Income poisons (lino 7 as a porcont of Nne 6c) e~ _ r g,-Program year(s) onvared in conifcation v 41 pYPY _ ~tcxVV~~,s n + 1 D. LowlModBenettifar Multi.YeatCmilBahons (complete only IIcerlllloolion perledexceeds oneVest) 10,a. Cumulative not expon(Almes subject to piogrnm benolil calculation $ In. Cumulative expondturos benaNn3ng low and modornlo Income persons o, Percent cumulative benefit to low and modotale Income persons (line tOb as a perconl of line 10a) Ream this record la years Pmviow 6660116 are o bsofuta rel. 24 CFR part 570 and handbook 65411) ~v C x li 1 Agenda No. Grantee Performance Report Ag ndaftam_/ s 111 ..w Low/Mod BonefitWorks eet Communfirrvolopmenl U A { blecJ; arwi Peveb .f1I E~le eaem ~q A 5 air awr--- , ~O B APPr?« No. .oor7 (exp. MIM) orl I Duel xpond force of Me Aoqu o 1 en, onalruei on of *Nab 111111 :n a propoAy er ew no pfom 1 To Q% 31 ~2 % of 111ud 18(i WWOry AcdAryftwne OWWild V*d War low1Owd "aof Fe ~bnlr.Pe~~ a aavhnod yl AoufaMd11 aedl Coll + npo, Mq a4ttli11 • 6 D.rI NrCD8D tl11pe,j11we11 Ue11d only torsi 11tl11ndOvarlwedieAulHInIMAe gtim of Olliat!XpindlluNi Q gWdtkn,CmNmelbner R11MbIMlalbn IPIr,p11Mylef{gip Aef ft Number % of uelu Ac Hly Nana In b~am low "win law/mod Kw" el Proprom Au utod Corr H11 $#I "a oocuplad ffvOnq Porlod rappNppoiiod by Owwmod A ' ~ _ cur„e(f3uflendovethudCcefe ponld To1111E11pondhwaoThb R►fwrllnti PorlsdkrA11gh11rA11uvhf11e Oualfylny11ela M efnofH ~~-T~• "•--~---•0--._ - , P11rtlYl yelalLsvrlMedPonellllremParis l,lf,endlll 115, %43 31'i 11o1eln lids leeord for yea11 , 743 Previaue ecidon Is ohwwb& Um Nd had 4 9.3 ok6e( re1,21CFgport d;O mdhendb handbook 't. j t J Aoe9GaItotrt1~s '.....rr~,..,,~ Grantee Performance Report U•S.DepusmeolofHousing Oita and Urban Deveio menl Gf ~~/as 0 Statfl9Of Ftlnc!r' D"Mant e ~(/1! .4" Part III WCCk Grant Proy-ern ~dt1, w - OMB APProvd No. 2608.0077 (sxp. w3IMO) c117 of nENTON 33-91-M%-/~8-0036~F097/01/91 fo Q7/gj/92 Ikegrun M~eenw wM 94rtw el lwnp Mwe Aceotx#e N°'n .Y. Aeiviry lime and Nenxe of tncon+e Mdd AeveH Lump Pmprn Inmenr; by fub hp Sum ~alwd ' e wpfent s.~ l.i SINCLE FAMILY REHABILITATION: RehabIlitatlon x loan repayments. X13,695 • A I i Much namthrr (ter Inswdbn>I tw 1 y r ry 1 t ~M ✓ ~'~r..,., ° ~~3R ' elY 1 S n",fig £i #i.'tl r,s'f'~~r 2: Tow HeWn tN$ record for 3 yew 13 695 pe9e j of t pega% Pfevious edtlon Is ohsolese form HUD4949.4(4 86ref, 24 CFA pertbl0 endhAndbook 6S10.1 C.J Grantee Performance Report U.S. o•rn 1 of Housing Direct Benefit Activities aem yp.,, 0~•ro~pmeninl k G •nl Pnynm We /~mowol No. ms-wn (•zP, jr 3v31M) Nifrr d Orr+u. GM Nwrinf PrM Ce.~M -g~_Mr 4A_nng6 r•+om ro n7/~l/9~ Paanl a row Rumba of HaaWgidvlwar AW swd (mYrm q wfa ar•: Tool NurnWr brand Whitt 6" Affaim /ulana Fwnd• A of Hou••n~ Modrart T Lo.f NORM** Nol"4wb kwl•na Kponb Pdk HudoAM" lMaw, D•so4Y•n "I ooa6on Po m s Ask W Wanes Yuan+a pipe dq'n Alms Wandw HousaW N•dr• • b e d • I p n I f k 1.1 Single Family Residential Rehab 19 H 100 84 32 47 - 21 - 21 3.2 MLK Kid CauueeL4ou 42 P 100 100 5 78 - 17 - 69 3.3. Police Athletic League 55 P 100 75 29 29 - 42 - 31 3.4 Prenatal Clinic 260 p 100 99 57 11 1 30 1 49 3.5 HOPE, Inc. Transitional Housing Prog. 2 H 100 50 50 50 - - - 50 3.6 TWU Cares 1063 p 100 100 31 28 * 41 * 27 5.1 Homebuyer Assistance Program 0 - - - _ - * less than 1% I 0 ~I 1 u 1 Q% ~ihfn tlw's nrcorE fu 3 s•ryt Pre HOUe eAOOns •rootifofets Pap• of PaP~ bnnHUG-dplf1,61/d8) r al, 2d M! IMrl 570 and handbook 6910.2 a t w9pw~,_, Am- IF 'r _ -wrrzinp ~i I E i U.S. f7epufinenl of Houelnq Grantee Performance Report ced Urban ~m I Actions to Affirmatively Further P vop Fair Housing OMB AWovW No, 250"77 (sxp, MLW) Q,w woo,; r.ea ca,...f ""1 p0 e-91-MC'-48-0036 Fmm 0 CITY OF DENTON 8/01/91 To 07/31/92 nerfr D Implementation of the City of Denton's Homebuyer The new pro;xam has allowed Community Development staff Assistance Program. The program pays 1/2 of the to work closely with local realtors and mortgage downpayment and all reasonable closing costs for the lenders. Staff believes the opportunities available to low purchase of a home costing $62,500 or less. and moderate income home buyers under the program furthers fair housing within the City. Newspaper articles describi^g the City's Housing Several caJlp .sere received and subsequently additional Rehabilitation Program and the levels of assistance families were placed on the waiting.J.ist. Due to outreach available to low and very low income families.were efforts staff have seen an increase in the number cf published, Hispanic Bank One has initiated a Community Homebuyer's Approximately 9 families have participated In the program Program. Under the program they provide training and are saving to purchase a home, to families on how to save for a home and how to anticipate and complete all paperwork involved in the purchase of a '.come. Advr,-rtisements inviting low/very low income families The Community Development Office wi.':1 assist 2-3 families by to apply for Romebuyer Assistance Program funding. 10/01/92. There are currently 30 applications for assistance on file. The City's Low/moderate Income Housing Task Force The organizational By-Laws and Articles of Incorporation me ! Is working to develop a non-profit housing completed. The Task Force will begin recruiting board me be I a development corporation to serve Denton and the for the non-profit. It is hoped that the non-profit will be surrounding areas. able to bring iu additional lousing dollars and complete new and innovative projects to increase the supply of p N affordable housing in Denton. 1 firm HU?4041.4 (~1 INS r - I Retain edit; roaoM fa J ye vt ➢~9e l of 2 e8 W. 24 CFP L.en 570 And handbook 8550.1 Pro~kud ent an eosofehe 4 l x s BIng Grantee Performance Report Mus,r,.aenn»n:efmmil d I1rEfen Dwefopment aX«;,;, " Actions to Affirmatively Further 0 Fair Housing 0M3AWavW No. M06-CO77 (e=p. Y31M) Orrs i:.rteM ProO Carts Mr.r d 6rrW CITY OF DENTON B- 19 MC-48-0036 fpm 08/01/91 To 07/31192 Amon, T~4M kwts p The City of Denton continues to participate in HUD`s Currently, with the assistance of the National. Development "Public Private Partnerships to Create Affordable Council, the City and the Denton Housing Authority are Housing Program." Under this program the City of working to rehabilitate an old hotel in the downtown area t Denton and local non--profits receive 3 years of for use as low income elderly housing. technical assistance from the National Development Council. The technical assistance is designed to a enhance the ability of City personnel and local non-profits to develop and complete projects that increase the supply of affordable housing rr in Denton. In 1981 the City of Denton adopted a ''Fair Housing Two individuals discussed possible fair housing complaints Ordinance. The ordinance waa amended in June 1990 with the Fair Housing Administrator. One complaint and included protection for families and persons involved a rental unit that was not within the City of Denton. with disabilities. The amended ordinance also the second complainant never returned to pursue the complaint, incorporated ANSI accessibility standards into Also, two rental units rehabilitated under the Rental Denton's building code, Rehabilitation have included some items designed to make them more accessible. Continued marketing of the Housing Rehabilitation In the housing rehabilitation program Denton has experienced and Rental Rehabilitation Programs. a diversity of racial and F1tihnic participants. It is also projected that during the coming year, the rental program will also see the participation of more minority owners. As of 07/31/92 two minority property owners are scheduled to participate in th Syr' rental program. ~ The Greater Denton Area Board of Realtors adopted a No complaints have been filed against any realtor. VA Voluntary Affirmative Marketing Agreement in 1981. members of the Community Development staff have provide Annual training on VAMA is conducted each year by the training to Board members on the new Homebuyer Assiatance~ Board. The Community Development Office is an Program. Members of the Board interact more regularly wi 1 affiliate member of the Board. the Community Development staff. I Ream hi teomd for 3 yem Pa"~_ of PWK mot 24 CF R oaA 570 ind U04M0. Gf42 Prey a edws en oeaole+e A C ti Rif Grantee Performance Report Us.Dlpanlre~ntulHoul rnd Urbin Dw~iep rd tl Actions to Affirmatively Further Gr ry1 ro M Fair Housing OW Approval No. 2505-0077 (IIIp. lrJ190) Nw a Oir.I1 om M.N " PIIO C Od M TY OF DENT012_ u_o1_rar_t,n_nn~a From q~01/91 TO 07/31/99 Aefen/ T~M~n ROW* 1 b Weekly notices run in the real estate section of The advertisement has generated a few inquiries regarJing the Denton Record--Chronicle. The notice provides fair housing and housing opportunities in general. the address and phone amber of the Community Development Office for complaint processing. i 1 4 i f PAWn hS r$60 for 3 yNK plgo d psgs+ form H04MI 1(4.661 prlvfow Leone ue obtioferl 3 3 rO. 24 CFA cart 570 rd hmdnoek 6510?? jr. f C c, n VA S~WA Y t! l~ Grantee Performance Report Us, DWarlmanl of Houoing Displacement Cnd Urban Dopm•nl Community Do4a+wlopmens ~ Alodn name" i.wtruciaw) 610d1 GM1 Program wms a awa• OMB Approval N^ o0 2506.0077 {Pap, m 1m) W+7 Nunea P000 C~6d CITY OF DENTON B-91-MC-48-0036 From 08/01/91 70 lew and 106d"d kwenw 1lwraalwfda MpW*W Du the L•1 C•m PW6d Program V•ar 07/31/92 - i4wanlm moo" M ns o•nwl 0&0 Fbu/anad/ NmtlninQ In QYI OM{W pYeq 0 wno woe d*OWW •ho asPl•oarwnl ;good houaanods raoalad io N o•nlus trap Trail Gronw Wnka 6 ed kno an Aren a 5titew 71"'t Ama can horn arodwr Consul pap Nof Indian Of 1uar+d PaoAC Nol Not hdannr ArMa wr:w Baek Anwrkan Aabna Napantd lflpaNC kaMun Wanda Kiank Haanid Alaskan H'aDWd Padnd Hot Ndl Ndan or Hips* PadAC Crfgh Odp'n Naew Origin Odg~n Nafn~ barrio hrhRNO Hnoank Aaah•n Warder + b e d • f 0 h 1 Odprn- Odpin Nodw m n- a P mss...' i 0 FAM IES 0 INDIV DUALS ERE DI PLACED AS A R SULT 0 PROD ACTI ITIES ' I . TeUb . ~ l O Rdain dfil rxord fa 0 pun Previws edlions ere obsdas Pago of Pages loan HUD.1010,7{1.Ad1 ref, 24 CPA pert 570 end handbook 65 t p, 2 ' r C n CITY COUNCIL A a ooopooof as 13,t D G ti ~ = C - OCOdA g O~ 0 ~~0000 o Q O O U a c n a o°°~~~ _r . u Agents No, ~ ~C? / LUCK A"! 7/-t 71 wit Cry0fVENTON r TEXAS MUNICIPAL 8U11.DING / 215 E, McK1NNEY / DEN70>'1, TEXAu 7£209 M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager Dr.. Tim Sonnenberg, Superintendent of Schools FROM: Susan McGuire, Employee/Community Relations" Hill Angelo, Director of Community Services DATE: December 8, 1992 SUBJECT: BROADCASTING OF SCHOOL BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS In 1988/89, the City of Denton renegotiated its Cable Television Franchise Agreement with Sammons Communicatious, Inc. (SCI), As part of the new agreement, SCI was required to provide a local government access channel for use by the City of Denton and the Denton Independent-. School District. Anothei major revision to the agreement Involved the elimination of the provision which required SCI to broo.acast Council meetings at the discretion of the City Council, in exchange for this rel_ief., SCI provided the City with a grant o" $60,000 for '.he acquisition of equipment to be used in the operation of the C ty's share of the local government access channel.. During the last few mo~iths, there has been considerable discussion , relative to the broadcasting of Denton Independent School District (DISD) School Board and City Council meetings. Much of this discussion has involved the potential. for sharing broadcast equipment which the City would purchase through its cable grant funds. T"e staffs of both organizations have researched Lhe various alternatives available and have developed a joint recommen- dat:lon on the approach that should be taken if and when the Board and/or. Council decide to broadcast their meetings. The following reports outline the opLJ.ons examined and provide a recommended course of action. A1,992.C/1 \4 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 'if ' cs,ncerµ. E~S? Agenda BROADCASTING December 8, 1992 Page 2. Upon receiving authorization from the City Council to pursue a cooperative approach to the broadcasting of meetings, staff attempted to find an entity which would enter into a contract for 4 such services. Under this approach, the needed equipment would be provided by the DISD and the City with the contractor providing the labor, technical direction, and basic supervision necessary for the broadcast, in this regard, vie contacted Texas Woman's University (TWU), Sammons Communications, Inc. (SCI), and the University of North Texas (UNT) to explore contract opportunities. Unfortunately, the personnel contacted at TWU felt that their department's schedules % ere too busy for the next two semesters, leaving them unable to seriously consider such a proposition. They did, however, express r.ome interest in considering the matter in the future. i Although they were not very interested in pursuing this matter, SCI quoted us a price of $75 per hour for such broadcast services. SCI's lack of .interest stems from their current production schedule for Channel 25 which would create some logistical problems for their production personnel. Although the services provided by SCI would be dependable and of a high quality, the total price of such services based upon 240 hours of service is estimated at $18,000 annually, which i; considerably more than either organization had previously discussed. UNT expressed stcong interest in this endeavor., quoting us a lump sum price of $15.200 annually which equates to approximately $63.34 per hour. While the quality and dependability of such service would also be quite good, the estimated costs are considerably higher than previously discussed. As a result of TWU's lack of interest and the high cost associated with contracting with SCI or UNT, staff has examined its original proposal for in-house broadcasting, Under this approach, broadcast. costs are estimated at $38,45 per hour or $9,228 annually for both organizations. The quality of the production should be good as both organizations have experienced personnel currently on board in oth,ar areas that fulfill the role of technical directors. A2992C/2 4 `t i. i AgendaNa,- ..v Agenda Nenl ~~s . • fYtte BROADCASTING 3 0~ /7 December 8, 1992 Page 3 i Should the Board and council choose to broadcast the meetings as in-house productions, the staff of both entities would recommend the following arrangement regarding personnel and equipment: ~ PERSONNEL: Each organization would be responsible for " selecting its own technical director and camera operators. Tho technical directors would be responsible for the coordina- tion of shared equipment between the City and the School District, along with their respective directing duties. Camera operators may be selected from existing staff or hired " as part-time administrative interns. The School District's Public information officer and the city's Director of Coi=uni- ty Services will coordinate program administration. EQUIPMENT: utilizing the previously mentioned grant funds, the City will purchase two light-sensitive three-chip cameras, tripods and Gabler at a cost of $26,494. The City will share these two cameras and associated equipment with the School District. Each organization will be responsible for providing a switcher unit ($4,595), a color T. V. monitor, two black and white T.V, monitors and any supplemental lighting equipment: that may be required. The CiLy will also provide reasonable access to any studio equipment and text scanner equipment for post production and community bulletin board operation.:. As a result. of the agreement to share the camera equipment, the School District has indicated its agreement to establ.i,.-h an equipment replacement fund and to provide for equipment ma.Liite- nance. The current value of the cameras is $11,900 each and both pieces of equipment carry a seven year useful life. A simple , amortization schedule over seven years would involve annual payments into the replacement, fund of $1,700 per camera or $3,400 total. Although there is no annual maintenance contract available for such equipment, approximately $750 per year should be budgeted for repair and maintenance purposes. After the cameras have been replaced through the utilization of the replacement funds, the city would consider the items as jointly owned and would share in any maintenance expense, and contribute equally to future replacement funds, A2992C/3 C. 4 I 1 w .0.,:.. r3 Agenda NO.__ Agenda item..l~f1..... IMO _za BROADCASTING December R, 1992 Page 4 In conclusion, we would also point out that some conflict could occur relative to shared equipment usage given the School Board's and the Council's current meeting schedule. Although the Council normally conducts its meetings on the first and third Tuesdays of the month and the School Board normally meets on the second and fourth Tuesdays, schedule changes occur occasionally. It is probable that during the course of a year, regular meeting schedules would change due to holidays, conferences and special events. In order to avoid such conflicts, it would appear prudent for one of the organizations to change its regular meeting date. The School Board has expressed a willingness to change its regular time from Tuesdays to another evening. Such action on their part would eliminate this potential conflict and lessen the probabili- ties that broadcast of Council meetings would take precedent over the broadcast of School Hoard meetings. We are hopeful that. this approach will meet with your approval. Should you have any comments or questions on this matter, please 1 let us know. Respectfully submitted, 1 Susan MCGui.re -L% Bill Angelo A2992C/4 t lpqlK CITY POUNCII _ i ~oooonpoaaoaor~ooo = o ooo- 0 0- `a o O b - DoOQ~O r ~ u, t F * r0~`V~ vooQVQUr~coti~~~~. 4. f i C(CWY UNT I EXIST, FIRE HYDRANT ~ O La a AAA L I ST - '-PRAIRIE am . 4 5TREET_ . 15EM 0SEWER EAGLE Q01E TM I ~ c ER COLLiu ~ J -L . ¢ I III ~s ~ ~ r v fl1 III PD-108 2F ZONING ~ , = ~ 638 III ZONING fi O • ccK • p~ sso ' III 01 µappE A4p1Y IflN WILLS o . III FASO f/116 PA SAQp p 1'2 1 MAA~1027/4 6 ito z , WATER • r • III 2 2213/2 ••:r. III z U ni I 1 N ¢ ~-40 SIDEWALK EASEMENT ` i M ~I 2523/10 W~ 7 =1 sl III 16' UTILITY EASEMENT 2F ZONING ?.923/02 \ I I III ~ _ a+a III s,# r III ~ ' Q I ~ III 238 62 ~ ~ SIOEWA EASEMENT ENT 18' ALLEY (ABANDONED) CITY OF DENTON 99/230 BY H/36 /36 ~ la Iau 11 I I N G .r \ t I I I• d sus I I Y 2 0 2 6' GAP BETWEEN n K y O tiQh~h o `i II-r- 0 1 J 2~ ~a LOT ADDITION I C, E F~AW~~I r PARALELL SEMENTS • • I I OFFENBACKER 16' UTILIT EASEMENT BY H/36 - I 1 H/36 73y15 . ifi , uJ I . j G s • 1 1190.00' 73, 81 ,~~1 ny z 648 1 WIT ' ~v "1"V+-, 4! _.SIDEWALK EASEMENT 0 74 82 , + --n 1•"-'252 l-~~ OD 1  16' UTILITY EASEMENT , I Tlw 648 NT 519 S. CARROLL BOULEVARD 2523/06 ACKEp Adfli ~ M1~~1CNA 06i I ! UFf~~~C/14 PR F ZONING ,yok~N 3244/162 _ PD.-108 : DENTONp TEXAS 76201 ZONING G'a 650 _0 I CK~A AO . 650 . . 'RECEIVED' On 0 g'm pLAtjxkk& s DEVELOPMEO MI NOTESi L EGEND 111 THERE ARE NO PROPOSED MAJOR CHANGES IN TOPOGRAPHY, E FIP Found 1/2" Rebar FL OODPL AIN INFORMATION 50 MON - Monument to ROW - Right-of-Way NO PAnT OF THIS TRACT APPEARS TO BE WITHIN AN AREA DESIGNATED AS A FLOOD HAZARD AREA SIP - Set 1/2" Rebar ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE -X- - Fence Line PROGRAM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR THE. -E- - Electric Line CITY OF OENTON, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS -T- - Telephone Line COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER 400194-00050, DATED AUGUST 4, 1987 BEING A MH - Manhole PP - Power Pole THIS FLOOD ITATEMEM DOES NOT IMPLY OR CERTIPN AND AS SHOWN !MALL NOT SE CONSTRUED TO IMPLY OR CERTIFY THAT THE LP - Light Pole rrov RTY Me/OR STRUCTUAES Sew HEREON, OA FH - Fire Hydrant STAUCTUM ERECTED AT ANY TIME AFTER THE DATE OF THIS wit SURVEY, WILL BE FREE OF FLOODING, OR FLOOD DAMASEm GREATER FLOODS CAN OA MAY OCCUR AND FLOOD HEIGHTS - Center Line B,Le- Building Line MAY BE IMCAEASW OR DECREASED BY MAN-MADE OA ammlowsw NATURAL. (ACIE OF SOD) LAUSESe DAAWNI A60 A U.E.- Utility Easmt, 0oE,- Drainage Easmt. CHECKED, S C.E,- Communications Easmt. r rr~~~ 1 5 1 F f i j' f i i I 5 STATE OF TEXAS S COUNTY OP DENTON ,_t 7 AHEkEAS, Dale Irwin is the of ng Loving Survey, At the William 2, Block 1, Offenbacker Addil AIES T tract being part of the J. M recardod tact also !n Cabinet H, page tract being all of that ?olurre 7357, Pawn 995 Real P TREET •1 .e ~ Q tract alsu being part of an a w of Denton from A.P. Crowder u Deed Aecorde, dated 10 Octob described ae follows: W i ~ I1! Segrnnlny at a found on Lot 2, samo point beinr,, I III Fred Moore Addition, an 0 1 III 4' SIG _ A' SIDEWALK EASEMENT recorded In Cabinet t•, P 2523/10 Thence South 87 degrees a said Lut 2 and the eou 119.72 feat the sootheai 163.62 foot the northea o III 16' UTIi -16' UTILITY EASEMENT renter of said abandoncH 2 Ilia 2523/02 2523/02 half-inch rebar for the i ; o `V I I I Thence South 02 degrees ONE IOU,-inch steel pipe at contiuuinw with the E3et pT 11 E4AppITION Crowder by deed recorde LOI 11 UAGR .1„ t S Dec w r 19011 said lins VL z III F~~a r - - 1 0 ! II /i III W III • J I11 F~ L`` Fp 1 L i III i J w III S--, 8701-o i• O 0.II S~ s' f r I 4' SIDEWALI ~ ~ c • EASEMENT EMENT B' >v M 00 = I I H/36 PA ,t O V o II~ io I I-• 21' ll. _ F - ~ 1 i ~=tt- 3~ r ~ j mot- - FIP f J ' I I I N87' 27 1 0811 4' SIOEHj,LK ASE:HENT 11 ~0 00' 25~~3/14~ 1 it _ _ N 86°46'24" W 4 J I 16' UTILITY E SEHENT ! I I 523/06 III N 02'22' 11 f ._Ll 1 a I • 1 L I r r 1 t  Hoeary Pv6l{c o~State of TexaY Comm sslon uxpJros FFIC.EIVED.o FBI Q-R a 1' t; B _I_L_k' I _A T K_ x4oW J♦LI, 14EN BY THESE PAY,S511T5i DEC D 8Wz ThAt 1, Stau4010 Rauptmarrn, kei plat and dnecrlptiun was prepare ttrt. the Iron pine shown horeon - PLANNING & :DEVELOPMEIT direct ion In accueJance with the f T~ DEPARTMENT VA C T:- ~r~ Yom- i_'TE _Ik " -1c Ill 1 OEM[ f L EGEND uNr G FIP - Found 1/2" Rebar ELM MON - Monument ROW - Right-of-Way SIP - Set 1/2" Rebar EME -X- - Fence Line ■ 1 Sr -E- - Electric Line i t. -T- - Telephone Line i ~.vlft_i I MH - Manhole PP - Power Pole i LP Light Pole j 1 FH - Fire Hydrant f - Center Line B.L,- Building Line I U*E,- Utility Easmt, D.E.- Drainage Easmt, it + zA C.Ea- Communications Easmt, S I L 1 1 Q 4 T~ ILa t r 1 r_ ~ i t i 'i I 7 Lk~ ' CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 41- TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Dee ,DGA 9 d' ~ d FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager DATE: December 10, 1992 SUBJECT: Status of the Civic Center Pool Renovation Project 4 gECOMMEND.T,ION: The Parks and Recreation Department recommends proceedirs,t with the revised schedule for the award of contract on the Civic Center Pool. Renovation Project. 4 I SUMMARY: Bids on the Civic Center Pool Renovation Project were opened on Friday, December 4, 1992. Of the 13 contractors that picked up plans, three submitted bids. All three bids oxceeded the projected budget amount and were ~ subsequently rejected. Several factors contributed to the bids coming in above budget. First, the original bidding phase was on a tight timeframe that reduced the amount of time the contractors had to prepare their bids. This prevented some contractors from value shopping on materials and labor. Second, several other large construction projects in the area were bid at the same time. This allowed contractors to be more selective on the projects they chose to bid. Third, becauao the Certificates of Obligation that will contrer n are n is et made sold, the the bbid id had to be V portion Several of the actors stated that h phased proposal confusing, causing them to inflate their bid. Fourth, in an attempt to preserve some of the original O'Neil Ford elements and reconstruct all of the concrete columns in their original locations, the cost of the project escalated. Finally, the bids for constructing some of the architectural elements exeet,ded the anticipated cost. The Parks and Recreation Department has met with. Philip Neeley of Carter & Burgess and Architect. Alan Nelson to determine: how the project can be revised. The revision will allow all elements identified in the original proposal to be eonstrurtFjd wi`.hout compromising the integrity of the project. The project team knows that J.t schedule, understanding the Civic scenter :Pool provides this anressential service to the citizens of Denton. The following is a general overview of revisions that will be made to the project drawings, specifications, and bid proposal to bring the project costs into conformance with the budget, The bid proposal will be restructured with two components: 1. The base bid, which will include the zero depth pool, demolition, utilities, gutter system, and filtration system. 2. An alternate section, which will include the pool buildings and other elemental alternates and deducts. The pool buildings have been redesigned to provide space to accommodate only the essential functions of the pool facility. Part of this redesign also included revising construction methods and making some substitutions in materials (i.e. shingles). In addition, certain minor amenities in the ' buildings will be eliminated (i.e. vinyl floor covering in staff area). The ~a r. i j Yi v J f 4 S Dtatus of Civic Center Pool Renovation Projeot A~°D 39 M ecember 10, 3992 G1J,, Page - 2 south trellis area will be rebuilt but not expanded, Gate, fencing will be revised, and alternate brands of and perimeter allowed for more competitive pricing, PO°l gutter systems will be No revisions pill be made in the design of the mechanical systems of the ` pool. This project will be bid again according to the following revised scheduler Sunday, December 20, 1992 , Sunday, December 27, 1992 First bid advertisement TuesdA", January 5, 1993 Second bid advertisement Tuesday, January 12, 1993 Pre-bid conference Tuesday, January 19, 1993 Bid opening Award of contract Although the award of contract has been delayed, the project will be completed by Memorial Day, unless prohibited by adverse weather conditions. i ~-QC & U D: Carter & Burgess and Alan Nelson, Architect, were selected in August, 1992, to provide professional services for the renovation of the Civic Center Pool, The schematic design phase was completed in September with presentations to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and the City Council, Construction documents were finalized in November allowing the bidding phase to begin with the advertisements falling on November 19 and 27, pre-bid conference on November 30, and a bid opening date of December 4, P$C'GRAMfi • DE P OR GROUPS managed by the Parks and hear- ets onB Department Civi citizens of Denton. and provides services to poolthe FJ~SML-IMPAS!t The total budget for this proect is sources: $300,000 from bond interest earnings andj$309 000$f.~omOcerti,ficates of Obligation, RESPEULLY SUB I',TED: , Lloyi V. Harrell Prepar?d b = / City Manager Nam~e- ~~Dlugas •~~~j,J, ~ , Title Director of Parka Recreation Approved: Name Be Y' MaKaa C fMk--- Title Executive q ector for Municipal Services/Economtc Development a C I CITE COUNCIL ~ d I o4o~dooa~ a ~~Q~o . T T: s C] O. e, - °O~oQaa~nno oo°o. 'T.T, 11:71-TT . T • i, i t ij A~AfldA No...~ - 0~3 r~ CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTEST NOVEMBER 17, 1992 The Coulicil convened into the Work Session at 5:15 p.m. in the civil Dafense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry) Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins; Council Members Brock, chew, Perry, Smith and Miller. i ABSENT: None 1. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters, real estate (considered sale of real property along Carroll Blvd. to Dale Irwin), and personnel/board appointments (considered an appointment to the Electrical Code Board). 2. The council received a report and held a discussion regarding nominating a candidate for possible appointment to the Appraisal Review Board for the Denton Central Appraisal District and gave staff direction. City Manager Lloyd Harrell stated that the Denton Central Appraisal District had asked for nominations for the Appraisal Review Board which needed to be submitted prior to December 1, 1992. He asked for instructions for names to file with the District. The individual needed to be available during the months of May and June. Counci Member Brock asked if the individuals previously mentioned been contacted. Mayor Castleberry indicated that John Marshall would be available if nominated. Council Member Perry indicated that he had talked to Hugh Ayer who was pleased to be asked but had graciously declined. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins felt that John Marshall had been a great City employee and would be a great nominee. , Consensus of the Council was to nominate John Mars, Ll. 3. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding a Council Adopt-a-Spot. City Manager, Harrell stated that this item was on the agenda at Council request. Cecile Carson, Keep Denton Beautiful Coordinator, stated that the program originated with the Keep Denton Beautiful Board in conjunction with the Highway Adopt-A-Spot program. The original program was a litter collection program to clean city streets and entranceways at least four times a year. Additional conditions could be imposed by the particular group doing the spot such as I c s ~ t Agenda I City of Denton City Council Minutes 41~ November 17, 1992 Pagel 2 weedeating, landscaping, etc. The Keep Denton Board had done a combination project at Carroll and Eagle by the IOOF Cemetery. They cleaned up the litter and maintained the landscaping. options for adapt-a-spot locations were listed in the agenda backup. The size of the locations varied depending on the group, their ambition and their interest, Council Member Brock stated that a spot not suggested might be tho bird sanctuary in southeast Denton. Council Member Miller asked if there were a list of spots Available to the public. Carson replied yes there was a list available and staff had one-on- one contact with the groups. She presented a slide presentation of some of the areas available and gave Council a copy of the adopt-a- spot agreement. Mayor Castleberry indicated that he liked the area on Ball Avenue by the railroad tracks. Council Member Smith indicated that she was in agreement to beautify with flowers but her chief concarn was with trash and that the Sell Avenue location was the beat spot for this. Council Member chew felt that Council Member Smith shouLl ))a the chairperson for the group. Mayor Castleberry stated the site on Bell Avenue botween Robertwon and Eagle would be a litter control site rather than a ' beautification site. Mayor Pro Tam Hopkins nominated council Member Smith as this supervisor of the crew. Consensus of the council was to adopt the spot on Bell Avenue on both sides of the street and that Council Member Smith would be the chairperson. The chairperson would handle the agreement and it would come back to Council for a formal vote. 4. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding an update on the Tntermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Deputy City Manager Rick Svehla stated that a memo had been passer] out to the Council that discussed recent information regarding the Act. Staff was still attempting to get final ansrrer.s on several projects, A meeting was scheduled in the near future with COG, 'the t `t t i \aenda No, C2 mto City of Denton city council minutes November 17, 1992 t Page 3 I Highway Department and staff to confirm the listings. The report , was favorable due to a new federal law and funding which was available for a number of issues not received before. There was approximately $28 million worth of projects on the list. The City's share was approximately $300,000. A negative side of the report was that a number of projects had been delayed including a s' number of projects in the City's 1986 bond issue, None of those projects had been built and had been pushed back. Fort Worth Drive was not included in the 9 year plan. Because all of the City's projects had been included in -:he plan, it was a better plan than the prior PDP plan because the new law required that only 30% more projects in dollars could be added to the list than they had money which meant more projects would be funded. COG had been recognized as one of the few in the nation who had completed this project. Mayor Castleberry and Council Member Miller had worked very diligently on this project, as had the Chamber of Commerce. The r Minute orders for some of the projects had helped get these projects on the fiat. Svehla discussed the projects on the list as presented in the agenda backup. U.S. 77 was not on the list. Highway officials had always indicated to staff that the project would be a special funding category. Svehla had spoken with John Blain of the Texas Department of Transportation and had been assured that it was an active project that was being worked on which would probably be in the out years. Staff would be visiting with COG and TXDOT to verify numbers, information and corridor improvements. Council Member Miller complimented Rick .5vehla, Jerry Clark and Catherine Tuck on the number hours they had worked on this project and on the positive relationship they had with COG and TXDOT. The city was very well represented on this project. The bond money which was available helped because local funds were available to do projects whit.h proved to be important. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins suggested a letter be scant to those individuals who worked on the project expressing the councills appreciation. The Council convened into the Regular Session at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. PRESENT.: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins; Council Members Brack, chew, Porr.y, Smith and Miller. ABSENT: None r r. e . ~1 1 l rJ I AgondaItom eja5 xi`. City of Denton city council minutes November 17, 1992 + Page 4 1. Pledge of Allegiance The council and members of the audience recited the Pledge of a Allegiance, 2. The Council considered approval of tho minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 3, 1992, Perry motionid, Smith seconded to approve the minutes as presented, on roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", chew "aye", Perry "ayes', and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously, 3. Citizen Reports A. The council received a citizen report from Herman Wesley regarding a city Charter review. Mr. Wesley was not present at the meeting. Mayor Castleberry announced that. a "Request to Address Council" had been received from Carl Young on this item, Carl Young stated that he wanted Council to consider putting together a charter review committee to look at the possibility of changing to a 6-2-1 council format. The current system was unfair to minorities and students and there was an unbalance of power, Several of the council Members were living in same area of town, Ile asked Council to consider a 6-2-1 plan for Council. representation. 4. Public Hearings A. The Council hold a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance amending Specific Use Permit No. 180 modifying the requirement pertaining to a proposed buffer, and allowing a storage/mechanical room, The 8.590 acre site, under the control of the Young Meng' Christian Association, was at the northwest: oorner of Windsor and Riney Roads, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0 at its October 14, 1992 meeting.) Frank Robbins, )executive Director for Planning, stated that this was an amendment: for the specific use permit for the YMCA. The affect of the recommended amendment would be that the planting ( buffer on the northern end of the property would be extended from \ 1.991 to 1994, The amendment would define what had to be planted and when, A small storage room would be added to the plan,, "o r, 0 a I l Agenda No Agandallet.. sue , City of Denton City Council Minutes November 17, 1992 Page 5 The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor. No one spoke in opposition. ' The Mayor closed the public hearing. The following ordinance was considered: No. 92-196 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING THE SPECIFI' [ISE PERMIT GRAIiTED BY ORDINANCE 140. 89-027 FOR A YMCA FACILIT4 ;.-7CATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WINDSOR DRIVE AND RINEY ROAD) PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLAII'IONS THEREOF) AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Brock seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. Mayor acknowledged the Leadership Denton: curs in attendance at the council meeting. s. Consent Agenda Mayor Pro .'em Hopkins asked that 5.A.2. be pulled for separate consideration. She noted a large difference in tho bids which raised a question whether it was cost effective to prepare the brochure v- presented, could it be done for a lower price with a different 3 of brochure. Lloyd Harrell., City Manager, stated that staff had analyzed the situation and had two concerns regarding the low laid. The alternate bid, although substantially less expensive, slid not meet the specifications the City had requested. To reject all the hide and develop alternatives would go past the deadline for registration of the programs. 'T'here might be good ideas which the alternate bid proposed and before the next year's printing of the brochure, staff would explore those ideas further, Mayor Pro Tam Hopkins asked if there were a possibility of going forward with the more expensive brochure for one printing and not for the other three brochures. ~•r t 'r. F w z sr ~endaNo,._ c' a(1r,ndaitem_.,, s ~ City of Denton city council minutes [}I@ !a_z~ November 17, 1992 Page 6 city Manager Harrell replied that the bid was for a certain number of brochures to be done throughout the year. Staff agreed that for a substantial price differential, the idea needed to be explored to make sure that it would be feasible to do for the next year. one goal was to make sure the document would retain a shelf life for the period of class registration. Council Member Miller questioned why only four bidders responded to the bid proposal. I Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent, replied that this had been a concern for a number of years. Part of the bid specification included a combination of the printing of the brochures and the sale of the advertisnments in the brochures. The revenues received from the advertising helped offset the coat of printing the brochures. An option would be to reduce the quality of the brochure or to do without; the advertising, Council Member Brock indicated that last year the brochure had a. glossy cover. She questioned whet was the cost of the brochures last year. Shaw replied that last year the brochure was four pages less and that there was a per page decrease over last year's price, Council Member Brook asked about total circulation, Shaw replied that were approximately 100,000 all together, Rick Dlugas, Director of Parke and Recreation indicated that $38,000 had been budgeted and the bid was for $37,000 which was under cost. Bight years ago the brochure was of a different type with less shelf life and when the brochure was changed, registration increased, Hopkins motioned, chew seconded to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. on roll ravote, Brock "aye", Miller 'gayer', Hopkins "aye"" Smith "aye", e , Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry +rayeu, Motion carried unanimously. A. Bids and Purchase Orderst 1. Bid #19211; - Wire, Cable, conduit and connectors 2. Bid #1927 - Brochures for Parks and Recreation ' 3. Bid #1918 - General Liability 9. P.O. #30.390 - Darr Equipment Third Adm. i 4 1 r , Onda No, Ayot idaIto S City of Denton city council Minutes ` November 17, 1992 ~a Page 7 6. Ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting w competitive bids and awarding a contract for purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services, (5.A.1, - Bid 01425; 5.A.2. - Bid 1427) The following ordinance was considered: i No. 92-197 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A I CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motioned, Smith seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith 'laye'+, Chew aye", P ryy ,aye", and Mayor Castleberry hays". Motion carried " unanimousl. B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving an administrative service agreement between the City of Denton and Frontier Adjustments of Denton. (5.A,3. - Bid #1418) The following ordinance was considered: No. 92-198 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL OF FRONTIER ADJUSTERS OF DENTON FOR ADMINISTRATION OF GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY OF DENTONI AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT FOR SUCH SERVICES) AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Brock motioned, Smith, seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "ayelt, Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of C competitive bids, (5.A.4. - P.O. #30390) r fr. 7~ . >i A r Agenda No._ 4;4.39 Agenda lteM_..4e__ L± Mato City of Denton City Council Minutes November 17, 1992 Q 4 Page 8 1 I The following ordinance was consideredt No. 92-199 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR -"1 EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIAL.9, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAvl EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Hopkins seconded to adapt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock 'taye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance retaining the law firm of Lloyd, Gosselink, Fowler, Blevins and Mathews, P.C. to represent the City in pending litigation styled Park Cities Municipal Utilities District vs_ iC ties of Dal as a-d Craoevie The following ordinance was considered: tlo. 92-200 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE RETAINER OF THE LAWFIRM OF LLOYD, GOSSELINK, FOWLER, BLEVINS AND MATHE418, P.C. To REPRESENT THE CITY IN PENDING LITIGATION STYLED PARK CT►'ZES M~NICIPAI; UT,TLZTZES QISTRICT, V~_C TI S OF DALLAS AttJQAkEyTNF; J AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motioned, Smith seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry I'aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. E. The council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing assignment pay for the Fire Department employee in the classification of Captain who was also assigned to perform the EMS Program Management duties. Rick Svehla, Deputy city Manager, stated that this had been part of the Council's budget discussions. This position would be in charge of, coordinating the continuing education and training for the paramedics. It was felt that providing this service in-house would be the most cost effective method. t c I } i 1! II~ Agenda City of Denton city council minutes ,C /o$ November 17, 1992 l Page 9 c The following ordinance was consider,~_ds No. 92.201 ° I AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING ASSIGNMENT PAY FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEE IN THE CLASSIFICATION OF CAPTAIN WHO IS ALSO ASSIGNED TO PERFORM THE EMS PROGRAM MANAGEMENT DUTIES, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Ho,akins motioned, Omith seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye+l, Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 7. Resolutions A. The Council considered approval of a resolution in support of a grant from the Texas Forest Service to Keep Denton Beautiful, Cecile Carson, Keep Denton Beautiful Coordinator, stated that the Keep Denton Beautiful Poard and Tree Board had reviewed a grant application from the Texas Forest Service which would allow the City to take a tree inventory on primary and secondary arterials in the City. This would provide a document which could be used for future maintenance and reference. The grant award would be $6000 with in-kind share from the City. Volunteers from Master Gardeners would be doing the actual inventory of the trees. PIayor Pro Tem Hopkins stated that the eo8t from the city appeared to be more than the grant and was this budgeted. Carson replied that there would be no additional budget costs. The city's share would be 240 hours if her time to supervise the intern and coordinate the project. It was a 50-50 match. council Member Brock asked Carson if she felt the grant would cover the inventory and complete the project, Carson replied yes. Council Member Miller asked if the software would be able to be used for other purposes. Carson replied .hat it would have very specific uses. They were considering software from the National Arbor Day Foundation which might be able to bo used to Inventory other areas such as city parks and be entered into the GIS system. •S Ii Apida No - e ~f_ A900dallen- 165 ?0~? %.6, I to ! ~1.,5"` 92_ City of Denton City council Minutes November 17, 1992 Page 10 f Council Member Perry asked if this would form a permanent record of all trees on city property when completed. Carson replied yes when it was totally completed. The first phase w would do arterials and secondary arterials. The following resolution was considered: No. R92-075 , v- A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A GRANT FROM THE TEXAS FOREST SERVICE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Miller motioned, Chew seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brack "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye'0, Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 8. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. i Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, presented the following items A. Council, at a prior planning session, had indicated a desire for a mid-year review. Last year at this time, Council had appointed two members to design such a mid-year planning session. He asked if Council would appoint two members to assist in the planning of such a session. Mayor Pro Tenn Hopkins stated that the Mayor had appointed the individuals last year and suggested he do the same this year.. B. Harrell reminded the Council of the special meeting next week regarding Council employee evaluations. The meeting would start at 5:15 p.m-in the City Manager's Conference room. 9. The following official action was taken on Executive Session items discussed during the Work Session Executive Session: Hopkins motioned, Smith seconded to nominate Fred G. Reed to the Electrical rode Board, On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller +0aye", Hopkins "aye'f, Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "ayu", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. City Manager Harrell reminded the council about the opening of the extension of Loop 288. The Highway Department had scheduled a formal ribbon cutting for Dec. 3 at 2:00 p.m. Jesus Nava, Assistant to the City Manager, had accepted a position as Assistant C City Manager in Larado. c ti w Agenda No,..._1~ Agendaltem ~S ?02 City of Denton City Council Minutes /1A November 9.7, 1992 Page 11 10. New Business The following items of New Business were suggested by Council Members for future agendas; A. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins stated that council had received a letter from John Miniter regarding the City's open house and had questions which the staff could not answer regarding the hydroelectric projects. She asked staff to respond to his letter and to give council a copy of the response. 11. The council did not meet in Executive session during the regular session. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m. i BOB CASTLEBERRY, 14AYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS JENNIFER WALTERS w CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ACCOOOCE f fq AtlendaNo . CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 49 NOVEMBER 24, 1992 i The Council convened into the Executive Session at 5!15 p.m, in the City Manger's Conference Room, PRESENTS Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tom Hopkins, Council Members Brock, Chew, Perry, Smith and Miller. t ABSENT: None 1. The Council convened into Executive Session to discuss personnel/board appointments (considered annual evaluationo of the Municipal Judge, the City Attorney, and the City Manager).4 With no further business, the meeting was adjourned. BOB CASTLE BERRY, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS J8N0 FER WALTERS CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ACCOOODO C n a w n a . T1.11 -TT -CITY COUNCIL, :MXT I T J~p`ti 00~ O O C G D°a° N r 0 N c* Od°O °0oor~aaacoo~°° E , 1 , Ag1iimNo._q? OJ1) Agenda ltem.~ Nse DATE:12/15/92 CITY COUN,IL REPORT i TO: Mayor dnd Tembers of, the City Council j i FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY AND FINAL REPLATS OF LOT 20 BLOCK It OF THE OFFENBACKER ADDITION, PLUS .135 ACRES OF UNPLATTED LAND; INTO LOT 2R, BLOCK 1. RECOMMENDATlO: The Planning & Zoning commission recommended approval at its 12/2/92 meeting, by a 5-0 vote. sAMMARY: The .4-acre site is on the east side of Carroll Blvd. and is located approximately 148 ft. south of W. Prairie t Street. It incorporates the currently platted Lot 2, k Block 1 of the Offenbacker Addition, plus .135 acres, directly to the east. The platted portion of the site is occupied by a recently-built office building, with paved parking to the rear. The additional .135 acres ip proposed to be paved for increased vehicle parking. u As portion is currently vacant, and functions ar an area of unpaved parking for the adjacent developme,.it. All public improvements have been dedicated via the original plat, which was approved in 1990. BACK RCx,.OUNQs The proposed Lot 2R is in two zoning districts. The platted portion is a part of Manned Development No. 108 (for offica use). The Detailed Plait for Planned Development !To. 108 (Attachment 4) was approved in 1990 and is approximately got- built. The unplatt,ed portion of the proposed Lot 2R is zoned 2F, for duplex use. Parking, incidental to the main use, it an allowed use in thco 2F zoning district, so no change in zoning is necessary. (Although it will be necessary to screen the parking from adjacent residence~i, por the landscape ordinance.) C. t w v •.a, 9:{raj- . AM IA NO. City services and facilities, including water, sanitary sewer, electrical, and solid waste, are available. Since the proposed lot: incorporates an area of duplex zoning, ch. 212.015 of the Local Government Code directs that the City Council review be at a Public Hearing, with advance notice given. The replats conform to the minimum r requirements of the subdivision and Land Development Regulations) Chapter 34 of the Code of Ordinances. i GRQ[VPS AFFECT P-: None FECAL IMPACT, f.1 .00 n/a Respectfully submitted: 2- &i~ Prepared by: Llo d V. Harrell City Manager G. Owen'' , ASLA Urban Planner App loved: .4 - anV Rob ns, AICP Executive Dir otor Planning and Development ATTACHMENTS: 1. Locution map. 2. Preliminary roplat, 3. Final replat. 4. Detailed plan. 4. Planning and Zoning Minutes. .y __fh t ,Venda No. e& 2, ATTACHMB3 T 2 Agendalten~ > P-92-038 Offenbacker Addition Rite_ g 'r NORTH cif r--,_~ j- oax _ I , E' q C~ 1! 00 J E..~_._..~~_.I MCxOfiYJt.",~I 7F L ~1WCl~ 471 Ire -7 a_j C~- L qAGLE I('~ afYll _ F r -1 AV-41 LNJ L i , L11 j F All i ' _ J L4ifLll k~ ALEGO VISTA HA y + ~ ~'7 J wtLGwwo00 1LILRLe -Zak} . f ~SS - A V ~..\j\~ s/- r_( \ iarrabeAarll usi lve Date: 11/23/92 Scale: NONE h r ii .Y Agands No. ATTACHMENT 2 pate 171 Z-92-038 Offenbacker Addition NF-1 ZONING Fo ~ ufl'IMIW' alYrtwngr p~ Vfa,U Il f - g ICARROL L ! B 0UL E YARD - i V y -v pKa ~ r l rr r.4 Ir•r•ra~ aw•r ra rarii•~{'wl w.r 4r rr r~• . r . w • w [40 ID J xl I' 7 ~ a ~ cam A 4 ' t> Fv- Q u - 1.,-- - - LP7 2R P N Co 1 42' ~wk BLOCK 1 I b a f ! . ~a.ooh ~ _ ~ 1 1 1 / ~k vnnU x £ PRELIMINARY REPLAT C Dow 12/08/92 Scale; NONE s T----,---~ -'--'.I`: -----.rte.-.~~ _ r~ A" Nn,_ - Apeeda Itamr____r ATTACHM~NT 3 I)ale_ ~ _ .t P-92.038 Offenbacker Addition r NORTH WEST PRAIRIE STREET J l' SIJ[YLLR C!e[[[Ni Ism 10 x ~T m3,11'.01 US[/Ut , 47 I ~ b J ~`,cR a"tae .t...9 taco :ooaEeloat W N ZEtM µ1a°jj2 r, 171 2o I Q) II J uBAN00ME01 14' ILLEY (lit or 0WON, SOB` I s i Q' M 4-1 EAx J Y 34 PA Fem. ! ff r 2R ' t, 8L OCK ft) F0.1 '39:01 r ~ !n N87'27' OVii S, Fledu! 90,00' N 87'17'tB" w 74,82 N 86'46'24" ,W 3,81' VOL0 ( " 'Y e' slur. uh i__ ~k N 02'22' 11" E 8. 62' J N a 1214, 44 I LOT I, BLOCK I GNI'O µ1N i •OFFCNBICNEA 100111 FINAL REPLAT Date; 11/23/92 Scaler NONE C 4 ~I f ItP, cefvrn 3VP o 988 F . _ Q - r I UCAi low NAP i' Iy. /./A'r/L I i w t ; QOrq JJJfff i Mrl no 1 motor, 7YM J. lJ. . / q 1' all 36'1~~1 r ; YOi~r ~ q r M~141/1 YY11~1 i CfWJy I ~i C 1 , WOU.(VW (IM•Irlw» MYl•rIIM arlYtgl M Ip} (t W"mm StaL N 1. FL + iwu 69 Y""irwiwL •w maw amolema i hne rW •--._-.-___.~_____.___._____...__-~T,~,___, I11 MQ 6v*arYlfitiW!rlu= illl Y Yr-I W406 -W 1WII»r Lan. a1R wolr RAW 00 W10 =418% MWKSSW W .v_ PARKING bINMUHM __UF:VF1I1QikN1_ SL!}EfIIN.E, ._._.(INNEH pr a./, aY• II%. w»•e I fr»ry•.LLY I. I•r• tMOOMIM IL 1. 1,,o rM! IIYIM 'VI~Y~ CYVOIIA flW ~ 0.w••• ~ ~ I r10t 11N )M •.r. I INE 1 , aM F. ~r Il nMt-JWW1f I. !MI cl~l nt JlI r. IYr Ali` wne1, tt1V (N1iNO 0660. Y MNY IW1M~0 tl /t;r r•11{nr W LI M►~•p . 4 N /Y4a rIM10r r r41iY I»MYr rnlllr Uri itJrACKllI Iaw F u+r w cwnr r 60 MM low C, L k i5 ti.. Agenda No. Agenda Item~_.'`~ , ATTACHMENT 5 P&Z Minutes ty~ December 2, 1992 `f Page 5 path is planned on the east side of the private drive along the eastern property line. The preliminary plat conforms to the minimum requirements of the subdivision and Land Development Regulations; chapter 39 of the Code of + ordinances. it was moved by Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Ms. Huey, and unanimously carried (5-0) to recommend approval of the preliminary plat for Lot 2, Block A, Exposition Mills and a Comprehensive Pedestrian Access Plan. V. Hold a public hearing to consider recommending a request for a variance from tho Subdivision Regulations regarding drainage improvements in the proposed Last Oaks Phase IV subdivision. i STAFF REPORT: Mr. Salmon presented the staff report (attached). Ms. Huey asked how far the subdivision is from McKinney Street. 1 Mr. Salmon roplied that McKinney Street is a little over one-half mile sough of the proposed subdivision. The ground in this area is so flat that the water would have to run almost to McKinney Street before it would drain out the end { of an underground pipe. The Development Review committee recommends approval of this variance because all applicable criteria are met and none of the adjoining subdivisions have underground drainage systems for this one to tie onto. Ms. Huey asked about the dispersion of the water onto other properties. Ms. Salmon said that there will only be a small amount of water. The proposed Swale will be shallow and wide. The sittiat.ion will nct be too much different than if the water was left to run naturally. When the proporty to the south of this subdivision develops, they will tie onto the swale, The Commission votCd unanimously (5-0) to recommend approval of tl,e rec;uost for a variance from the subdivision Regulation:; regarding drainage improvement,; in the proposed Past Oaks Phase TV subdivision. V2. Hold a public hearing and consider recommending the f prel-ii-ninar.y and final replats of the offenbacker Addition, s t . e AgendoNo,_ Agenda ltaet~'a~A P&Z Minutes tiie_~/~=19Z December 2, 1992 Page 6 i Two notices werEi mailed to surrounding property owners j none were returned. a STAFF REPORT: Mr. Yost presented the staff report (attached). PETITIONER: Bud liauptmann of Metroplex Engineering stated is that he was available to answer questions. No one was present to speak to favor or in opposition to the replat. Chairman Rngelbrecht closed the public hearing. I Ms. Huey moved to approve: the preliminary and final replats of the Offenbacker. Addition. Motion was seconded by Mr. Cochran, i Mr. Engelbrecht noted that screening is necessary between the parking lot and adjacent residences. Motion carried unanimously (55--0). ' VII. Consider the amending plat creating Lots 25-R and 26-R, Block 7, of the Westgate Heights Addition. STAFF REPORT: Mr. Yost reported that a fence was built ~ between the two lots In a coi iunications easement on Lot 25, Due to an incorrect measurement, the fence was b.lilt entirely on Lot 25. However, the owner of Lot 25 sill convey 393 square feet to Lot 26, putting the fence between i the two newly created lots, This is agreeable to the homeowners of each lot. 'Phe amending plat will supersede the existing plat. The site is coned Planned Development, and no chiinge in tuning is necessary. PLTT.TI.ONER: Gerald wade, Centex Real Estate, also known as Fox and Jacobs, stated that tho error occurred when the fence builder located the incorrect property pin. Mr.. Yost stated that, those are no lines in the communications easement. if lines were put in, the fence might have to be demolished. The uasement has precedence f aver~ the fence. The applicant and the two property owners are aware Ual. the fe~nco. ih in an easement. \ Mr. wade said that he t:h.i.nks there are telophone. lines in ~ 'a t r~ i F CITY COUNCIL 4 1 7 pOO~OQ0 r ' ppp~ t ti dpi b amp:. n . Q o~~~Op~QO M r ,O~OO~ppO IMM onoocao TITZ ,t ii 1 r ALL0001F agenda Na.- `l AQendaltai Q ; ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVID- ING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFEC'T'IVE; DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated con- petitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and i WHEREAS, the City council has provided in the City Budget for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the ma- terlals, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted herein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the numbered items in the following numbered bids for materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid Proposals', attached herto, are hereby accepted and approved as + being the lowest responsible bids for such items: BID ITEM MISER -NO ZEENDOR 1435 ALL OSMOSE W0011 PRESERVING, INC. 1491 ALL SIIF:RMCO $ 43,167.00 1446 ALL NORT11 TEXAS NURSERY $ $ 3),000000.00 SECTION I7'. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to \ purchase the materials, equipment, :supplies or services in accordance with the terms, specificauions, standards, quantities I~ and for the specified sums contained in the 13.id Invitations, Bid Proposals, and related documents. x a s~ "i Agenda W. Aganda hm,~ tats ,SECTION III. That should the City and persons submitting ap- proved and accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to onter into a formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the writ" an contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written contract: is in accordance with the terms, conditions, spec- ifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained in the Bid Proposal and relater] documents herein approved and accepted. SECTION I1. That by the acceptance and approval of the above ' numbered items of the submitted bids, the city Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount: and in accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective imme- diately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1992, j 1 BOB CASTLLBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTI,RS, CITY. SECRETARY , BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL NORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: 4 C I 1 4 w F ~ e ti r. 111 A No.._. Agenda BID 1438 i (}8(e ~01fLG~~~%D BID NAME TEST & INSPECT WOOD UTILITY I OSMOSE WOOD J7 POLES PRESERVING,= I I OPEN DATE NOVEMBER 19, 1992 1 (QUANTITY( DESCRIPTION VENDOR I ~ VENDOR I -1-1 1---l 1 I A. 1 [TREADED POLE(INCLUDES Co BELOW] $18.82 I EXHIBIT "A" I B. I IREJECTED POLE(INCLUDES C,BELOWI $16.95 1 I C. I IMPORTED POLF 1 $1.45 I I e D. I ISHIGOMETER INSPECTION I I I I(INCLUDE C, ABOVE) I $4.49 I I E. [HOLLOW HEART INTERNAL I I I ITP.EATMENT (AS REQUIRED) 1 $7.95 I I "oe F. (FUMIGANT TREATMENZ AS REQUIRED( I I WOODFUME PER POLE 1 $8.50 I 1 MITC-FUME PER VIAL 1 $4.05 I I 0. (TREATED REJECT POLE [ 1 1 ](INCLUDES C, ABOVE) 1 $19.81 I 1 H. ] ]WORK SUMMARY I N/C I 1 1 I I POLE REINFORCEMENT 1 1 1 I I I 1 I A. I IRE20RT POLE I $36.94 1 ] B. 1 (REJECTED POLE FOR I IREINFORCMENT I $41.29 I *O,I IREINFORCFD POLE I SEE: ATTACHED i I I SHEET I I I*ADD :47,10 PER REINFORCER FORI 1 I J POLES WH ARE 100 FEET VA I 1 I I'MORE iROt- A PUBLIC ROAD. 1 1 I I SIZE REINFORCER 1 1 I I *SEE ATTACHED SHEET 1 1 1 { I I I f I 1 1 n ` Rite UNIT PRICE SCHEDULE FOR POLE REINFORCING (Distribution Fe.les) NESC Crade B Cons,euction *A. Reinforced Pole P 0 L F, C L A S S Pole 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Height 301 $459.17 $383.95 $363.9i $330.15 $330.15 $314.76 $303,77 35, 530.36 459.17 383.95 383.95 330.18 314.76 303777 u 4p~ ~~530.36-- 53036 49.17 _393-.R5~383.9~ 3;10.151J^__ 45~ 695.49 530.36 459.17 383.95 383.95 -330.15 _ J 501 830.98 695.49 530.36 459.17 ^383.95 S51• 868.29 744.15 22 477.82- 60' 868.29 868.29 744.15 561.22 T 65f 1017.46 868.?9744.15~~ '7_0'101J_.4_6 1017.46 868.29 T~-.•_~__ B. Reported Pole $ 36.74 C. Rejected Pole (No Charge if inspected by Osmose within 12 months) $ 41.29 D. Remove and Replace Telephone Co. Steps $ 13,87 E. Dig up and Locate Underground cable $ 14.59 F. Break up and Replace Concrete $ 29.43 *Add $47.10 to all poles that are from 100 to 300 feast from accossibility of truck. 4 s Agenda No, Ae +aitem.~~s DAiAM;_Dh'CEMBER 15 1992 CI'T'Y COUNCIL REPORT TO* Mayor and Members of the City Council t FROM., Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: 13I1) # 1435 - TEST AND INSPECT WOOD UTILITY POLES RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the only bidder, Osmose 4 ~ Wood Preserving, Inc. at the unit prices listed: Section 1: a A. Treatod Pole $18.82 B. Rejected Pole $16.95 C. Reported Pole $ 1.45 D. Shigometer Inspection $ 4.49 E. Hollow Heart Int. Treatment $ 7.95 F. Fumigant Treatment $ 8.50 vial $4.05 V. Treated Rejected Pole $19,81 H. Work Summary NIC Section 2: A. Reported Pole Reinforcement $36.94 B. Rejected Pole Reinforcement $41.29 This award will not exceed $20,000.00. SUMMARY: This bid Is for testing ane reinforcement of wood utility poles thr)tl h out the Electric Distribution Sys tern of the City of Denton. This testis recommended to be done every seven years and was performed last in 1985. Although Osmose was the only bidder their prices are in line with what other utilities , are paying. They have performed this work for the City in the past, meeting all requiroments of the contract. One bid wan received In response to five bid invitations mailed. BACKGROUND{ Tabulatlon shoot. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Distribution Division, Electric Utility, Cttstomers of the City of Denton. FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted Funds for 199:3 Electric Distribution Overhead Malntenanoo Account #610-080-0252-8339 balance of account $31,3420.52. t c , 1R Awda Ilem_ dn4646~~~ ogle ia._ r~ CITY COUNCIL REPORT DECEMBER 15, 1992 PAGE 2 OF 2 Respectfully submitted: t to d Harrell / City Manager / Approved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title; Purchasing Agent AMDA. 312 I a \f r, 'K Agenda No,_ a .tt~~~0iioaandafiem.~~--- - DA'i'L~`-DL~CEI4~SLrR°2'J; 1992 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO., Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM,. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager. SUBJECT: BID #1991 - 800 HP 3-PRASE INDUCTION MOTOR h RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder Shermco in the amount of 43,167.00. SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of a replacement 800 horsepower motor to flrive the draft force fan for Unit Five Boiler at the Municipal Power Plant. I BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet, Memorandum from Jim Thune, Manager, Electric Production. PROGRAMS,DEPAR_TMF.NTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Denton Municipal Utility Electric Production. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for this motor is provided in the 1993 CIP projects for Electric Production. Estimated cost was and available funds ure $95,000.00. I Respeot lly :~ubmittod: 1 Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager i A Approved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent agonda.117 C i Agenda No,~_~ = - Agenda Item_ -2e- 4 A BID $ 1441 I1t9,___J~=- /D I BID NAME 800 HP 3-PHASE INDUCTION I SHERMCO IND. I SOUTHWEST I EA TERN I MOTOR I I ELECTRIC I ELECTRIC j OPEN DATE DECEMBER 1, 1992 I I APPARATUS j jQUANTITYI DESCRIPTION i VENDOR i VENDOR 'i VENDOR ~ I I I I i 1. I 1 I 800 HP 3-PHASE INDUCTION I $41,627.00 I $43,193.00 I $42,417.35 I I I MOTOR I TOSHIBA I TOSHIBA I TOSHIBA I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I I B1.I ADD I THERMOCOUPLE INTO BEARING I $1,540.00 I $1,584.00 f $1,440.00 i r { METAL, BOTH BEARINGS I I I I I I I I I I B2.1 ADD MOTOR HEATERS N/C -O- I -0 I I I ~ I ~ j I I I I I f ~1 It ti:. _ .11 R1~1111dAt111,_,D✓....7_ Agenda Itsin _ Ls. ~..4.., DA".nFr.EmRy.H IS.„ A992 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Mombers of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harroll, City Manager SUBJECT: BID # 1446 - TREES CONTAINER GROWN RECOMMENDATION: We recommend tius bid be awarded to the only responding bidder, North Texas Nursery and Landscape at $16.00 per tree. Estimated " expenditure is $32,000 for 2000 trees. SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of approximately 2000 trees designated to be given to citizens of Denton for participation In the "Tree Power Program". This program was very successful last year we feel that the positive response from the participants warrant a continuation of the program. The Tree Power Program is intended to be a five year 12,000 tree program. Bids were solicited from elrht (8) prospective local vendors and only one response was received. The responding bidder is the same supplier as last year and the price remains the same. Coupons will be distributed to Utility Customers and these individuals will ,present the coupon to the designated supplier and receive a tree of their choice at no charge 1 be supplier will submit the coupon to the City of Denton and we in turn pay the supplier for the tree. BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet. 1 PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Denton Municipal UtiN_ty and { the Citizens of Denton. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for continuation of the Trae Power Program were approved in the 1992.93 budget. Account number #610-080-0267-8983 balance is $99,979.14. Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V. Harrell--- City Manager Approved: \ Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purehas.ing Agent agenda,3l9 ti t - - 1 . ApuntlaHa,. - ~ ~ BID A®eadaltem l a a b BID NAME TREES CONTAINER GROWN I ~D ID IN. TEXAS NURSERYf OPEN DATE DECEMBER 8, 1992 I& LANDSCAPE I I I I QUAN'T'ITY I DESCRIPTION I' I I I I VE 100A I 1• I 2000 ITREES, CONTAINER GROWN AS I (PER SPECIFICATIONS AND SPECIALI $X0'00 I f (TERMS AND CONDITIONS I I f I I r I I I I I I I I j I I I I I I I i • 1 4 i. r~ I { i r C ITS' COUNCIL ~Q ~ ~ a OD 0 4 Cl O~~f o N. S °0~aa ooa a~ ~1 LLLI.i MEMO& r i 1 ii 5 it agenda No. IWO Agendaltem 1 iklle Al /ty CRDINA14CE NO. OF ORDINANCE CONTRACTS AFOR PPUBLICOWORNSr OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROM DOING HFORtJT HE 4 EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the city has solicited, Yeceived and tabulated com- petitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements ; in accordance with the procedures of state law and city ordinances; s and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has receiv- ed and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public provements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and plans and specifications therein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the following competitive bids for the con- struction of public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid invitatins", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications on file in the Offire of the City's Purchasing Agent filed according as be number assigned hereto, are bidng the lowest responsible bids: accepted and app AMOUNT BID NU HE_A CONTRACTOR $337x070.05 HAYSON CONSTRUCTION 1431 SECTION _11. That the acceptance and approval of the above A competitive bids shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the bid for construction of such public oved, until such works or improvements herein accepted and appr. ifi person shall comply with all requirements ofpa w its n c ntract and and payment bonds, after notification of to Bidders includin the furnishing of f p P the award of the bid. SECTION ITI. that the City Manager is hereby authorized to cont conss'truction ofethe public wo ks orimprovements in accordancefwith con roved herein, provided that such contracts the bids accepted and app Bidd are sand documents a re.l ti with q t1le Notice thereto specifyi g rthenterms, Propos- als, C 1 r Agenda Nd.__ Mond aItem~~~ me _zg Cl? tions, plans and specifications, standards, quantities and, speci- fied sums contained therein. SECTION IV. That upon acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and improvements as authorized herein, the City Council here- q key authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the 1 amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized contracts executed pursuant thereto. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective im- o med.''Lately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992, BOB CASEEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WA.LTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY A BY: i 'r Y A s j D i Agenda ltv~ DAWY4L.3IECE6A,BF.R A.j 1992 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID # 1431 - STUART ROAD SANITARY SEWER ANT/ STORM SEWER A RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid he awarded to the 0west bidder for both the sanitary sewer and the storm sewer. 1. Sanitary Sewer - Barson Construction $139,187.85 ,E I'1. Storm Sewer - Barton Construction $1971902, 20 Total Bid Award $337,070.05 13UMMARY; This bid is for the upgrade of both the Stuart Road Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Drainage in the areao of Sunnydale, Kings Row, Sunvalley and Manhattan, The total project is approximately $13,150.00 under budget. The project includes 2000 feet of 15" Sanitary Sewer and approximately 2400 feet of Sto -m Sewer ranging in size from 18" to 36" diameter. This major inerr_ase In capacity should prevent sewage backups and overflows into the surrounding areas. BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR CROUPS AFFECTED: Citizens of Denton, Denton Water Utilities. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for Sanitary Sewer improvements will be taken from 1993 CIP funding. Funds for the Storm Sewer improvements will be taken from 1986 CIP funding. Respec ully submitted: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Approved: Nnmo: Tom D. Shaw, C,13,"M. Title: Purchasing Agent ngonda.778 C i C 0 x .y sawn H,. BID 1431 f I I I I I BID NAME STUART RD SA14YTARY & DBR I BIL MIX PATCO I CIRCLE "C" I BARSON I STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION I UTILITIES INC I CONSTR. I CONST. OPEN DATE NOVEMBER 19, 1992 i I I I I , $ IQUANTITYI DESCRIPTION f VENDOR f VENDOR VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I I I I I I I I 1. f I SANITARY SEWER I NO BYD I $179,453.00 f $229,945.90 f $154,889.00 I $139,167.85 I I I I I I I I 2. I J DRAINAGE I $285,898.00 $221,899.00 I $336,455.69 I $234,114.00 I $197,902.20 J BOND I YES I YES I YES I YES I YES I I I I I I I I I' i I I I I I I Z BID 1431 I I I i i I I I I I BID NAME STUART RD SANITARY & I J B.~. COMPANY J RADICH I MOSS J DICKERSON f STORM SEWER I I i CONSTRUCTION I CONSTRUCTION I CONST, f OPEN DATE NOVEMBER 19, 1992 I I I J I I # fQUANTITYf DESCRIPTION VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 1. f J SANITARY SEWER I $181,010.00 I $169,992.12 I $315,534.45 f $143,376.04 I $219,PI9.80 1 I I I I I ! I i.. I I DRAINAGE I $225,490.00 f $206,108.51 I $264,204.49 I $1970917.35 I $284,805.00 I I I I I I I I I ~ BOND I YES I YES YES YES f YES I f a 1 I I I ! I I ~ ~I 4 I I I I I I I ,~1 i t~ a 4 l n CITY ~COUNCI: _ J i ~~OQQoQfl ~ WOO~U l N W~ vp~ ~0ooccocc~o~~o ~ TTT 11 it f4. - Aa~ AAendaMe//rn7~7 (kltA December 15, 1992 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBvRS OF THE CITY COUNCIL t FROM: Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDER REVISION OF E',ECTRIC GENERAL SERVICE SMALL (GSS) RATE SCHEDULE RECOMMENDATION; The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of November 16, 1992, recommended to the City Council approval of the proposed 1 change in the GSS electric rate schedule to provide primary J service discounts. I SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: 'r The recently approved electric rate ordinance divided commercial customers generally into two basic groups, those with demand above 250 KW (General Service Large - GSL) and those with demand below 250 KW (GSS), Customers on the GSL rate receive a .1cP per KWH discount off the energy charge and .30 per KWH discount for ownership of the transformer equipment. Five customers who previously received primary service and one customer who owned transformation equipment were moved to the GSS rate schedule because they were not large enough to qualify for the new GSL rate, However, the GSS rate does not provide any discount for primary service or ownership. in order to be fair to these customers, a revised GSS rate schedule with a discount provision for primary metering and equipment ownership is proposed in the attached exhibit. The discount is the same as currently provided for in the GSL rate schedule, FISCAL SUMMARY: The proposed revision of the GSS rate schedule would slightly reduce electric revenues. 4 i f 11 4,. Page 2 City Council Agenda Item PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: ij Citizens of Denton, Electric Customers, Denton Municipal Utilities, Legal Department, Finance Department, Public Utility Board and City Council. Respectfully submitted, w j i ~Ll yd . Harrell, r City Manger Prepared by: Howard Martin, i ctor Environmental Operations & Financial Administration Approved by: . R.E. Nei on, Executive Director Public Utilities Exhibit: I. Revised General Service Small Electric Rate Schedule II, Minutes of PUB Meeting of 11/16/92 tt A c. ALL003CA agenda No... Agenda lte~t Sl le;'- J /I ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY. OF DENTON, TEXAS AMENDING PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 92-172 PROVIDING FOR CHANGES IN THE SCHEDULE OF RATES FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE BY AMENDING TAE ELECTRIC GENERAL SERVICE SMALL } (GSS) RATE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ~ WHEREAS, the City Council has previously adopted a Schedule of , Rates for Electric General Service Small (GSS) Rate and wishes to amend the Rate to reflect increased minimum demand for a I I electric services supplied at one point of delivery and measured through one meter; NOW, THEREFORE, ~N THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the City Council. hereby amends City of Denton Ordinance No. 92-172 by amending the Electric General Service Small (GSS) Rato. SECTION II. That the Electric General Service Small (GSS) Schedule is attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION I TI That this ordinance shall become effective January 1, 1993, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER,WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: a i" i . d agenda fda. ~ Agondaltemr ~ S , SCHEDULE OSS CGENERAL SERVICE SMALL (Effective 1/1/93) 4 AP L CA O The GSS rate is applicable to any commercial or industrial ; customer having a maximum less than 250 KW for all electric service supplied at one point of delivery and measured through one meter. Not applicable to resale service in any event, not to temporary, standby or supplementary service except In conjunction with applicable rider. NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Customer Facility Single Phase $15.00 per 30 days Three Phase $20.00 per 3o days (2) Demand Charge $ 7.00 per KW (first 20 KW not billed) (3) Energy Charge First 2500 KWH 6.50/KWH All KWH over Vf00 3.504/KWH (4) Energy Cost Adjustment current ECA Schedule MINIMUM BILLING An amount equal to the facility charge plus the greater of: 1) the demand charge calculated on the actual KW demand, or 2) A seventy percent (70%) of the maximum monthly demand charge for any month during the preceding months of May through October. TYPE OF SERVICE Secondary service available to commercial and industrial customers. The city will supply single-phase service `or three-phase service if av,01able at the point of delivery) at sixty (60) cycles and at any standard voltages available from tie Cityls distribution system through one standard transportation. Where service of the type desired by the customer is not already available at the paint of service, special contract arrangements between the City and the customer may be required prior to its being furnished. i k' Y. -'W4 4 I jl hate PRIMA S RVT E DISCOUNT Customers who own, operate r necessary to receive three , and maintain all facilities hase voltae ice and all transformation facilities requiredrforrconversionstovUti.lization voltage shall receive a discount of 0.3 customers utilizing city owned and operated Prfacility wand servicershallnreceivemandiscounts of y oto receive primary voltage operate and maintain all metering facilities, eiThe shall theriat primarywor secondary voltage. P Y NT' Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid { within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. "U MTNATTnu OF DEMM_Q The demand shall be deter.minud by the KW supplied during the determined period of maximum use during the current month as by City's demand meter, but shall not be less than 70$ of the highest monthly demand determined during the billing months I` currenttmonth. 0In no case shall billed demand bellese thann0 KW, in cases where the connected load is constant, the City may, at its option, estimate the KW demand. For neon signs, one volt ampere shall be considered the equivalent of 3/4 watt. OW R F~C~O The City reserves the right to make tests to determine the power factor of the customer's installation nerved either by measurement during periods of maximum demand or by measurement of the average power factor for the monthly billing period. If the power factor is below ninety percent, the demand for billing billingsdmand by 9de0%taermndined by ermined power uncorrected factor. bPFCTAL &U11TIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. Page 2 e x S ~y. rgXr 1~ H , i a Dare PRORATION OF UTILITY ILL (a) Billing for ithe Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. t, Formula: 1 Actual days in reading e o x customer facility charge ~ 30 days i (b) Billing for demand shall be calculated an a 30 day per month basis and prorated for longer or shorter billing periods. Formula: grtyal days in reading Deriod,x adjusted Kw demand x Rate 30 days ENERGY CHARGE Billing for the energy charge shall be based on actual KWH consumption during the billing period. Formula: KWH in rate block x Rate per KWH in rate block ENERGY COST AD.7USTMENT H charge per KWH of ennrgy taken for fuel cost calculated in accordance with Schedule ECA. I f I I i " Page 3 (i tt v. }r AQ 811 d 8 N 0 • ApendalIemL-,** gate.. ~1~2 47 EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES NOVEMBER 16, 1992 I 7. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF GSS ELECTRIC RATE REVISION. Bill Giose mado a motion to accept. Bob Copien second the motion. All ayes, no nays, motion carried. i i EXHIBIT.,1L. t SY Y s - - - - - - - - - - - - - rw , 1 CITY CGL~j~tCIL a - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Y" II o~a~Qo000 a R 000 { p~~ . 00 : o q o w Uri I ~ Cl C] .po av O dp o N K ~~Q4G000009~00 T11 T. r: 1 1 r agenda Item Me, CITY _COUNCX.L_ REPORT FORMAT To: Mayor and Membors of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Proposed Addition of a Recreation Leader for Children's Programs in the Parks and Recreation Department DATE: December 8, 1992 « RECOMMENDATIOn: The Parks and Recreation Department recommends the adoption of an ordinance appropriatinc, funds for the addition of a regular, full- time Recreation Leader and fixed assets for the Children's Programs area, SUMMARY: The addition of a Recreation Leader would provide necessary assistance in the supervision of the current After School Action Sites and camp programs. The position in the Children's Programs area will be funded exclusively from the Recreation 1>und. A $10 per month fee increase to participants was implemented during fiscal year 1921-92, in order to expand tha Recreation Fund's revenue base so that the addition of a Recreation Leader in Children's Programs would be adequately supported. The extremely broad scope of supervision in Children's Programs has created a critical need for the addition of a regular, full-time programming position. This need has become even more critical in the face of khe additicn of an enrichment program for the After school programs. BACKc~~20UJ~[>: The demand for services from Children's Programs has dramativally increased since the inception of the After School Action Site program in 1983. Participation has grown from 245 part.icipantx in 1985 to 365 in 1992, representing an overall increase of 49%. The recent expansion of existing sites, plus the transfer of the management of the Martin Luther King, Jr. Recreation Canter's after school program to Children's Programs, has placed even more demands on the Supervisor of the Children's Programs. When the Supervisor pos:.,tion was originally created, the position was only responsible for After School Action. Notes,. Currently, additional responsibility for summer day camps, Summer After School Action Sites, programming for all City-wide children's special events, and the new Summer Food Service Program lies with thre Children's Programs Supervisor. Throughout all of this expansion and growth, Children's Programs still has only one regular professional staff member to manage the enti.rQ program. h lit 7^ T- ; - WOFF ' 6f p PROPOSED RECREATION LEADER FOR CHILDREN'S PROORAM54gendaltem-._/s.,, e Page F~tOaRAM1DEPARTMBNT1a~0UPS AFFECT$T~: In the current situation, the span of control in Children's programs is already reaching an unmanageable level, By continuing to add programs and new site responsibilities to the Children's i rrograms area without the addition of regular full-time staff to take on the programming functions, it will become even more difficult to properly manage the program area and maintain appropriate supervisory/participant ratios. As such, justification for a Recreation Leader in Children's Programs has been submitted as a part of this documentation, Participation fees in the After School Action Sites were raised $10 per month in fiscal year 1991-92, with the intention of generating revenues for programming assistance for Children'o Programs, Revenues continue to be collected for 1992-93, specifically for adding a Recreation Leader as programming staff, RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: lV. Harre City Manager Prepared by; Rich Dlugas z Director of Parks and Recreation Approved by: I Bet TMcK_Gan Executive Dir ctor for, Municipal Services and Economic Development t e Y ii n CoS Agswe N0 _ December 9, 1992 !Ata Ch?LDREN'S PROGRAMS 1 History and Status of Proaram The demand for services from Children's Programs has dramatically increased since the inception of the After School Action site program as indicated below: ~ I • Revenues have increased from $89,559 in 1.986 to $214,641 for 1992. This is a 140% increase in the last six years, a • Expenditures have increaser) from $133,856 in 1989 to $198,498 in 1992. This is a 48% increase in four years. • Sites have expanded to accommodate an additional 126 participants since 1985 which indicates an overall increase of 49%. Participation has grown from 245 participants in 1985 to 365 participants in 1992. • Total daily attendance rates have increased 74% in five years. In 1986-87 attendance totalled 32,124 participants while attendance for 191-92 increased to 55,976. • Temporary/ seasonal staffing needs for the After School Action Site program have increased approximately 500% since 1983, growing from six leaders to 30 in 1992. In 1983, the After School Action site program was implemented at three sites. in 1986, a Program Supervisor was hired, and the site locat9.Dns were expanded to seven, sites were then expanded again in 1987 to include all nine local elementary schools. Due to the continually increasing demand for the program, three of the elementary schools provided the use of additional school space to allow more children in the program during fiscal. year 1991-92. The Martin Luther King, Jr. Recreation Center's Kid Connection Program will also be added to the supervisory responsibilities of the Children's Programs supervisor in early 1993. Current discussion with the Denton Independent School District includes the prop~)cal of expanding the program at two other school sites as well as the planned construction of a tenth elementary scuhool. Registration for this tenth site will be conducted in May, 1994, with program implementation that August. Throughout all of this expansion and growth, the Leisure Services Division had only one regular professional staff member to monitor this program. Since 1985, the Children's Programs Supervisor has had sole responsibility for monitoring budgets, preparing reports, communicating with parents, and supervising a college-age temporary/seasonal staff for the program. In anticipation of a need for additional professional staff support for the program, the division increased participant fees by $10 Tier month for fiscal yoar. 1991-92. in this way, the division has ensured that funds ara available to support this proposed position prior to submitting a request for the position. The Children's Programs budget represents 42% of the tot.11 Recreation Fund budget. 1 F1 V~ ~end~ No • Q~:.Q:~ y December 9, 1992 Page - 2 When the Children's Programs Supervisor position was originally i created, the position was only responsible for After School Action Sites. In 1988, programming for the eports and Nature Day Camps was redirected from the recreation centers to children's Programs ~ and expanded to include Art Camps. The Leisure Services Division was then able to offer a comprehensive day ramp program. , Currently, Childron's Programn offers four (4) summer day camps and two (2) Summer After School Action Sites. Children's Programs also has programming responsibility for all City-wide children's Special events which has multiplied the supervisory responsibilities for r^ the overall program. ~ I Due to the dramatically expanded responsibilities, sites need additional monitoring and supervision. This has been increasingly difficult for the Children's Programs Supervisor to accomplish alone. The negative consequence could be a deterioration of the program in the public's eye and, thus, a reduced source of programming and revenue for the division. City Council has approved in adding an enrichment program to all sites in A.S.A.S. It will. simply not be possible to successfully coordinate a quality enrichment program without the added position proposed here. Many excellent idjas to enrich the participants' experiences in our A.S.A.S. program have already been generated. As such, the division telieves the current Children's Programs can be carried to a new level of excellence with the appropriate staffing support. The expectation of the quality of incumbent for a temporary/seasonal position does not compare with the quality and commitment that can be expected from a full-time professional position. With the physical expansion of the sites and the ` Council-requested expansion to include enrichment programming, it will be critical to the overall success of the program that another professional level staff member assist in the supervision of Children's Programs. Whilo ;ob responsibilities have continued to increase for the Children's Programs Supervisor, no regular, full-time staff has been allocated to help support these programs. It is proposed that a professional-level Recreation Leader position be added to Children's Programs. MAJOR SHORT-TERM PROGRAM GOALS: 1. To give on-going, professional support o the Children's Programs Supervisor. 2. To ensure quality service delivery to the program participants in both the A.S.A.S. program and. all. Children's Camps through added professional support to the programs. 4 C r, tt e Agenda No. 2.- December 9, 1992 Agendalfen~.~ ~ - r.. Page - 3 PQ 1e_ 1/z 3. To ensure proper management is maintained throughout the planned program expansion of two other school sites, the transfer of the management of MLK's aster school program to Childrents Programs, and the addition of a program site with the construction of a tenth elementary school. The following was prepared to outline the financial needs for 4 adding a Recreation Leader to the Children's Programs area: 11 L AMOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER 7 AC(,'OUNT TITLE REQUESTED 8023 Tech/ParaProfessional $ 8,369 8051 Longevity 0 8061 FICA 644 8062 TMRS 856 8064 W/C 197 8065 Health Insurance 11818 8068 Life Insuranca 55 9102 Furniture/Fixtures 3,369 9103 Office Machines -A03 Sub Total $15,411 TOTAL PROGRAM FUNDING REQUIREMENT $15,411 The above reflects an employment date for the Recreation Leuder of January 2, 1993. The budget also includes funds for capital expenditures for furniture and office machines. The "Funding from Other Reeiources" is gained by the reduction/elimination of two temporary positions, that can be accomplished by the addition of a Recreation Leader in Children's Programs. AJJ00415 C t r B:\BUDGET.0 AMSNo._%a Agenda Item__Ze S. . zcz ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING THE 1992-93 BUDGET OF THE CITY OF DENTON BY APPROPRIATING THE SUM OF FIFTEEN THOUSAND AND FOUR HUNDRED AND ELEVEN DOLLARS ($15,411) FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE OF THE RECREATION FUND TO VARIOUS ACCCJNTS IN THE RECREATION FUND TO PROVIDE FUNDS FOR A RECREATION LEADER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. a WHEREAS, the City Manager having recommended that an emergency exists because of the grave public necessity created by adding the enrinhment programs and another licensed child care program to the After School Action Sites operated by the Parks Department, which necessitates the hiring of an additional recreation leader, and requires the amendment of the 1992-93 budget of the City of nsnton to appropriate the sum of $15,471 from the unappropriated balance of the Recreation Fund to various accounts in the Recreation Fund; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the City Coun,: il, based open the City Man- ager's recomnLandation, finds that an emergency exists which neces- sitates the amendment of the 1992-93 Budget and hereby adopts the recommendations set forth in the preamble of this ordinance, SECTION II. That the sum of $15,411 is hereby appropriated from the unappropriated balance of the Recreation Fund to the following Recreation Fund accounts: FUND ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT RECREATION 261.-031-0062-RO03- 8023 $8,369 8061 644 A V 8062 856 8064 197 8065 1,818 8068 55 9102 3,369 9103 103 SE'T~ ION III, That the City Secretary is directed to attach a copy of this ordinance to the original budget and cause this amend- ment to be published once in the Denton Record Chronicle as soon as possible. SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall. become effective Lmme- diately upon its passage and approval, ~Y N T T~~ c, 11"A 1. F, Y 09"08 No Ape~altem_. ()ale!a~_l PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992. - , BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR a ATTEST: JENNIFER WAITERS; CITY SECRETARY Yk~ BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CIT" ATTORNEY I i Page 2 G C I'X COUNCIL y. Ll.L - Jll 4C , o ~G c5 c°7 07 0~ G~ { a~Q~O r k t E + 0O~~~ ~~GpQOOOGU~~~~ J -M T - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 9d o4 ORDINANCE NO. 93 ORDINANCE DIRECTING THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES Off' OBLI-i'ION OF THE CITY OF 09NTON THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON CITY OF DENTON i WHEREAS, it is deemed necessary and advisable that Notice of Intention to Issue Certificates of Obligation be given as hereinafter provided. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. That attached hereto is a form of "NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION OF THE CITY OF DENTON", the fora and substance of which are hereby adopted and approved. Section 2. That the City Secretary shall cause said NOTICE, in substantially the form attached hereto, to be published once a week for two consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, with the date of the first publication to be at least fifteen (15) days before the date tentatively set for the passage of the Ordinance authorizing the issuance of such Certificates of Obligation. A n r~ i j ~ Agenda ,!5 THE STATE Or TEXAS ;qeo ; COUNTY 01' DENTON E CITY OF DENTON ; N071ICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION OF THE CITY 0_E_2EVM0N 9 THE CITY OF DENTON, in Denton County, Texas, hereby gives notice of its intention to issue CITY OF DENTON CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION, in accordance with the Certificate of Obligation Act of 1971, as amended and codified, and other applicable laws, in the maximum principal amount of $1,450,000 for the purpose of paying all or a portion of the City's contractual obligations incurred (1) pursuant to contracts for the con- struction of public works, to-wit: renovating a City swimming pool; and (2) pursuant to contracts for the purchase of the i following equipment for City use: three refuse collection trucks, r- brush collection truck, a stake bed truck, three fire fighting trucks, an ambulance, a four door sedan, and twelve police cars; and also for the purpose of paying all or a portion of the City's contractual obligations for professional services of engineering, attorneys, and financial advisors in i connection with the above contracts and said certificates of I Obligation, The City proposes to provide for the payment of such Certificates of Obligation from the levy and collection of ad valorem taxes in the City as provided by law, and from certain revenues derived by the city from the ownership and operation of the City's Utility system (consisting of the city's combined waterworks system, sanitary sewer system, and electric light and power system). The City Council of the City tentatively proposes to authorize the issuance of such certifi- cates of Obligation at a meeting commencing at 7:00 p,m. on the 19th day of January, 9,993, in the CJ.ty Council ronm at the Municipal Building (City Hall), Denton, Texas. CITY OF DENTON, TEES By Tennifer. K. Walters, City Secretary r 1 f, f Ap* No. Agendall 4.. CITY of DENTON, TV"AS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. WKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM DATE: December 12, 1992 TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager. FROM: John F. McGra»e, Executive Director of Finance SUBJECT: NOTICE OF INTENT TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION This ordinance provides the Notice of Intent to Issne Certificates of Obligatx.on for sale on Tuesday, January 19, 1993. The Certificates will provide funding of $300,000, for swimming pool renovations. The sale will also provide funding for the purchase of vehicles thit are us?d in the city's annual vehicle "lease/purchase" program. Following is a list of the proposed vehieleF: i'• VEHICLE COST • One rear load refuse truck $ 70,000 • Two roll off refuse trucks 190,000 • One brush collection truck 75,000 • Twelve police sedans 168,000 • Two sire pumpers 360,000 • One wildiand fire truck 80,000 , one ambulance 105,000 • One (one ton) stake bed truck 22,000 One four door fire sedan 15,000 It is intended that the term of the certificates will range from three to ten years depending upon the estimated '.fe of the assets provided. If you naeO additional information, please advise. JFMcC+taf AFF00461 8171566.8200 OIFW MC-TRO 434.2529 l 1, . 1W , } -L Li CITY a: COUNCIL t . •I.1 ,i I~1 ~to r TTT Col' CQ ~F 03 OOO~d r O g Z A CD °OOQaoonr~aoo°° ~ : - XMI s. r: 1 + agends~da.. _~14i /V CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT A90da4m two ym L:~/15~.~~ ryf TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager DATE: December 9, 199? SUBJEI;T: Donation of Barworth Corporation Property for Pack Purposes " I RFt'.o [~IOiV s The Parks and Recreation Oepartment recommends acceptance of the 5.925 arras of land from Barworth Corporation to be used for park purposes subject to forms approval by the Planning and zoning commission. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board received a briefing on this property dr' in Executive Session on Novembvr 16, 1992. it was the consensus, of the Board to accapt the property. The Planning and Zoning commission also received a briefing on the property in Executive Session on December 4, 1992, and will + take formal action regarding tho donation on December 16, 1992. 1 $UMMy: The Parks and Recreation Department recommends acceptance of this property bared on severcl iactors including its proximity to Bowling Green Park. Although the property will remain in its natural state for some time, the site will eventually serve as a neighborhood park for residents within walking distance oi° the park, Future development could include playground equipment, picnic facilities, and walking/jogging trails. Because it is adjacent to an existing park and it is not the department's intent to develop the site at thin time, no fiscal impact on the operating budget will occur. The site also allows the City to extend the preservation of the floodplain. The Barworth Corporation also owns the 39+ acres of undeveloped land to the north. Because the 39+ acres could potentially develop as a residential subdivision at some undetermined time in the future, it has teen requested that this donation be accepted under the city's voluitary Park Donation Policy (Attachment 2). Innis will be the first donation accepted under this ' f policy. While the Planning and Zoning Commission may require that the City be allowed to turn the property back to the owner if any environmental hazards are discovered on the property, assurances have k~aen given by the owner's:, engineers that no such dumping has ever occurred. ]Mogj;jQMI The Barworth corporation has approached the City of Denton regarding the donation of 5.925 acres of vacant land in northeast Denton. ~,"he property (Attachment 1) is adjacent to Bowling Green Park and falls between Hinkle Drive and Malone Street, just north of Haygard Street (Auburn). A portion of this property lies within the 100 year floodplain, :including a small drainage channel. PROGRAMS. DEPARTME,ILTS Q]2 GROUIjS, AFNF.C'`ED; Parks and Recreation Department will accept the management of this site which will provide benefits to the ` residents of northeast. Denton. `P t ~j Yf Donation of Rayzor Property ~i WO ''OII F December 10, 1992 I Page - 2 cy /S Q EjaQAL Ok=,i There will be no fiscal impact to the Parke and Recreation Department's operation and maintenance budget. RESPEC ULLY SUBMITTED: d GGLG~/~ Lloyd V. Harrell _ city manager Prepared by: Name R ch blugas~- Title Director of Parkm and Recreation Approved Name a ty M can Title Executi Director for Municipal services/Economic Development I C. c' it ~endaNo.__ nc..~@1.~." I4~ I x0.795-9 Ac -c ~illJr'~~/✓/• I ~ ee ~0 t r,T a- 4c= q4 7rAl te~ M v A A BOWLING n yAwctl~ll7 G REEN - ta''4~a PARK pr A ` ~j 40 r JECT SUB u Sao ' ~av PROPERTY .~w 4 AUBURN DA. 5, (NA4G1lO) 1 I ,nr. TTnT .u,u 0 1 v O O Q j U = no la x \ 41 . ATTACHMENT 1 r+ 'AV 5 5 r. 1': ,3 n..lA 4 f AoandaNa,_. yep l Agenda ltem.. s.4~F NIB RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF TFIE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING A PARK DONATION POLICY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. HE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON; o 6=199 r That tha City of Denton Park Donation Policy, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is approved. ~ECT7.Q IT, That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1989. J~ RAY S7} ENS, MAYOR /j ATTESTS J' LF R AL R8, CITit SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: ~Y11~ .Mr. l ATTACH ENT 2 Agenda Ifero- Ile CITY OF DE TON PKU GJnTION POLICYaI© /~7,"l~~ y~~ Backcroun~i ~ development,~ithefCityhofnDentonrhas parks the nadoption residential of an ordinance requiring the dedication of land, or fees in lieu of land, to provide for the acquisition and improvement of park sites. In response to the proposed ordinance, the development community has requested that the City adopt on a trial basis, a park dedication policy in lieu of a mandatory park dedication ordinance, o in a cooperative attempt to provide for park sites and improvements on a voluntary basis. Application of 9ntirv`~ This policy, developed in cooperation with the development community, is intended to provide equatable guidelines to be used by persons developing residential properties within the City of Denton and its extraterritorial jurisdiction for the purpose of encouraging participation in a cooperative effort to provide for the parks or improvement of parks which will be needed to sorve those developments. This policy is intended to be a voluntary program. Compliance or non-compliance with its guidelines by any person shall not be used by the City Council, the ,lanning and zoning commission, or any other commission, official, or employee of the city in considering an application or request involving a zoning 'natter, the approval of a plat, a building permit, or any other application or request which requires the approval of the City Council, a board or commission, official, or employee. Policy gnations or'Lu 'dj 1. Andl~a Lion and Ang ~ Donations of land should be made by any residential development which contains Soo or more dwellinn units. The donation should be in the amount of no less than on(' acre for each 100 dwelling units. 2• Land T he land to be donated should be selected in consultation with the Parks and Recreation Department. Consideration should be given to locating park sites adjacent to school sites, whenever possible. whenever linear parks are to be provided, they should be located around natural drainage and wooded areas to provide for multiple uses. For neighborhood parks, the land should be sufficient in size and shape to accommodate, on land located outside the 100-year floodplain, the following uses: two (2) tennis courise, twelve (12) parking spaces a picnic building, a basketball court, a playground area, and other facilities specified in the Park Mapter plan for that area. Areas to be used { i r n Na._ Agenda for soccer and baseball fields may be y .located withfWn -t4tf-p,sex•-° , floodplain when the topography is otherwise suit hlDel~fc~ thug/.2-/s"y,~, uses. 3, Pgrk Site IMpl:ovements. When the land to be donated` is contiguous to a development, the developer should bear the cost of platting the site, providing public streets, driveways, and water and sewer service to the site. The City will bear the costs of all necessary streets, water and sewer lines and storm drainage improvements within the boundaries of the donated land which are t necessary to make the park site usable. 4. Manner of Dgnation. The land should be donated by dedication on the final plat of the development. ~ B. Fees n Lieu of Land. , 1. Application_and Amount. A fee should be paid in.lieu of donating land for any residential development containing less than 500 dwelling units. The fee should be in a minimum amount equal to one-fourth (1/4) of one per cent (13) of the construction value of the dwelling, as identified on the building permit. 2. Payment of Fega. The fees should be paid to the city at the time the building permit is issued. The fees collected by the city shall be paid into.an interest bearing park trust fund account maintained by a local bank for the benefit of the City. The trust account shall be subject to the terms of this policy and shall be paid to the City, upon re est, at the time the funds are to be used for the purposes provided herein. 3. Use of Funds. All park fees collected must bey used to purchase land for parks or to improve existing parks withir the park planning area of the residential development for which it was received. C. Combination of Land and Fees, where it would be advantageous to the City and the development, the developer may make and the City may accept a donation of land, combinAd with the payment of fees, to satisfy the requirements of this policy. D. Return of Donated Land or Fees, 1. Ste4 if the land dedicated by plat for perk purposes is not accepted by the City within ten (10) years from the date of dedication, the developer may revoke the dedication. 2. Fees. If the fees paid into the park trust; fund are nct paid to the city for park purposes an provided herein within ten (10) years o!e the date of payment to the park trust fund, the trustee shall, upon the request of the person making the payment, return the funds to that person. PARK DONATION POLICY/Page 2 C y+ t if CITY OF DENTON AgendeNn,_ a.~ Park Donation Policy Summary Agondaltem Purpose To provide neighborhood parka In the community. Background The Park Donation Policy was drafted in cooperation with the development community. The policy is designed to provide equitable guidelines for the donation and improvement of neighborhood parks by developers of residential properties. The policy is a voluntary program and was adopted on a trial basis in lieu of a park dedication ordinance. , Type of Development Affected All single family and multi-family residential developments in the City of Denton and the City of Denton extraterritorial jurisdiction. Donation Standards Donation of park land, fees in lieu of land, or combination of land and fees. Lands 1 acre per 100 dwelling units Pees in Lieu of Lands 1/4 of It of construction value criteria for Acceptable Park Land o Minimum of five (5) acres located outside of the floodplain unless the floodplain topography is acceptable for thi+ placement of athletic fields, o site aut`iblo for the construction of perk and recreation facilities. o Land may be located inside or outside of the development but must be w W IM proximity of the residents of the development being served. o Adjacent to a school site whenever possible. Developer is responsible for site planning, platting, off-site drainage improvements, access to utility services, and direo. access by an improved street, Criteria for Expenditure of Park Development Funds o Park land acquisition which may be a new site or expansion of an existing park site, o Park development. o Improvement of an existing park. Land Donation Procedures site Plan Indicate location of all proposed park facilities Preliminary Plat - Indicate number of dwelling units Indicate land donation Final Plat indicate number of dwelling units Indicate land donatioil ti' •1 y~ Agood alte .-~-F 2ZI-at - indicate number of t1lld.ta_b l~'~ ~v'~ indicate number of units by reply t YA - indicate resulting additional land donation Land Donation - Between the time of final plat approval and 501 build out Pee Donation Procedures Buildinc Permit Aonlicatlon Indicate construction value Pee Donation - At the time of issuing a building permit One quarter (1/4) of one percent (1%) of construction value ° Pees credited to park zone in which the development is located Park Policy Approval Datesi to~ 5/23/88 approved by parks and Recreation Hoard 11/13/89 approved by planning and Zoning Commission 3/21/89 approved by City Council Exam lss A developer builds Soo units in an area with no existing park acreag®., standard ■ 1 more per 100 units To figure the total acres needed to service a particular residential development, plug the number of housing unity into the formula. 1 acre x (N of units r 100) N of park acres required A developer builds single family or multifamily residential units in an area where an undeveloped park already exists. Standard ■ Construction value x (.254) To calculate the lees in 11eu of land to service a residential development, plug the coasktuatiin value of the housing units into the formula. $ 70f0Q (.238) $175 $ 80#000,A (023%) $200 $ 90pooor" x 623%) • $225 $1000000 x' (.231) $250 $110#000 x (.250) • $275 $1201000 x (.254) + $300 f ADM00036 C c . 1 ~ J f AAA010C7 ~I dolt iil} ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING A DONATION OF 5.92 ACRES OUT OF THE ROBERT BEAUMONT SURVEY FROM BARWORTH CORPORATION (GRANTOR) TO THE CITY OF DENTON TO BE UTILIZED IN EXPANDING THE NORTH LAKES PARK] PROVIDING v CERTAIN CONDITIONS ARE MET BY GRANTOR] AND PROVIDING A CREDIT TO GRANTOR FROM FUTURE DEDICATIONS REQUIRED OF GRANTOR FOR PARK LAND ON PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE DONATED TRACT. I WHEREAS, by deed dated day of December, 1992, BARWORTH CORPORATION, through its duly authorized representative, Jess ' Newton Rayzar, conveyed 5.92 acres of land out of the Robert Beaumont Survey, Abstract 31, to the City of Denton for park purposesl and WHEREAS, the 5.92 acres conveyed by BARWORTH CORPORATION is contiguous to an existing park within the city of Denton; and WHERREAS, the City of Denton desires to expand its park facilities. located adjacent to the property conveyed by BARWORTH CORPORATIONI NOW, THEREFORE, THE COU14CIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the 5.92 acres of land conveyed to the City , of Denton for park purposes by the BARWORTH CORPORATION on December _ , 1992 is accepted subject to the fallowing conditions: (a) That prior to Deceidber 31, 19920 the Planning and Zoning Commission, recommends acceptance by the City of Denton of the 5,92 acres tracts and (b) That any ad valorem taxes due to any governmental entity for 1.992 or earlier years on the 5.92 acres be paid prior to December 31, 1992; and (e), That this acceptance shall be revoked if the City of Denton discovers the existence of toxic or hazardous wastes/materials on or within the 5.92 acres. Such toxic or hazardous wastes/materials include, but are not limited to, hazardous materials/ wastes as same or defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended, and the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended. SECTIQN11. Tnat the 5.92 acres conveyance hereby accepted by City may lie used by BARWORTH CORPORATION, its successors and assigns, as a cr6dit in lieu of donations or dedications required of the ownership of the 39.91 acre tract located contiguous to the 5.92 acres conveyed herein (in the Robert Beaumont Survey, Abstract PAGE 1 L w .;j Age~dr.Nn•~..~y ~ ~ Ajt30d01t8A7,,.,.~•S ~ - Ao r ~J 31 and the N.HI Meisenheimer survey, Abstract 810 and more partic- uldrly described as Tract Two in the conveyance from Rayzor Investment company and others to Barworth corporation recorded at Vol. 907 Page 677 of the Deed Records of Denton, County, Texas) by reason of Resolution 89-022, amendments to such resolution or other resolutions or ordinances subsequently adopted by the city of ~ Denton requiring the conveyance of park lands as a requirement for development of the subject 39.91 acre 'tract SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992. r BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BYt APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BYs PAGE 2 r. r AAa010C7 djc G ltye~tla Itam...._......,,.....~,~.- WARRANTY DEED Dates Grantors Barworth Corporation, a Texas Corporation of Harris Down County, Texas, Successor throuttt DeVeloPmeAt CO., Board, Inc,, acting by and g- Jess Newton Rayzor Grantors DrMailing 4th Adlooor, Denton dCounty,tnDenton12T4xas 76201-1771 ° Graatees City of Denton, Texas Granteero Mailing Address (including county)s 215 E. McKinney Street, Denton, Denton County, Texas 76201 oonsidexations Ten and no/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration Property (including any improvements) 1 1.524 acres out of the i Robert Beaumont Survey, Abstract No. 31, and being a part of a 31.202 acre tract conveyed to H.W. Down Development Co., Inc, by deed dated April 24, 1963 by Jahn W. Porter J and recorded in Volume 493, Page 257 of the Deed Records 1 h of Denton County (more particularly described as Tract I I in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes) and 4.4 acres out of the Robert Beaumont survey, Abst.reu:L No. 31, and being all that certain tract conveyed ►,y Lauis Groening to H.W. Dawn Development Co., Inc. by dead dated March 29, 1965 and -shown of vecord in Volume 521, Page 200 of the Deed Recordo of Denton County, Texas (and being more particularly described as Tract II in %xhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes) constituting a total conveyance of 5.92 acreu. Special Marrantiess Grantor warranto that toxic or hazardous materials /wastes including, but not limited to, such hazardous, wastes as are defined in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Aci, (RCRA), as amended, and the comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and ?stability Act, (CERCLA), as amended, are not stored on or within the subject property. Grantor warrants to assume all responsibility for and shall indemnify and defeind the Grantee against all co6ts, claims or damages associated with the existence, if any, of the toxic or hazardous wastes/materials upon or within PA,GL 1 yr E H fl Agenda lterrs &S A`L?L._.__ IM 4A i~ the subject property mentioned above accruing against Grantee prior to a revocation of acceptance of this conveyance, if applicable, by Grantee. c Reservations from the Exceptions to Conveyance and Warranty: This conveyance is executed, delivered and accopted subject to all valid restrictions, covenants, easements, outstanding mineral reservations, rights or royalties, if any shown of record in the Office of the County Clerk of Denton " t county, Texas and all zoning laws, regulations, and ordinances of municipal or other governmental authorities. Grantor, for the consideration and subject to the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance and warranty, grants, sells, and conveys to Grantee the property, together with all and singular the rights and appurtenances thereto in any wise belonging, to have and hold it to Grantee, Grantee's heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns forever. Grantor binds Grantor and Grantor's heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns to warrant and forever defend all and singular the property to Grantee and Grantee's heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same or any part hereof, except as to the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance and warranty. When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. WITNESS my hand at Denton, Texas this day of December, A.D., 1992. A OESS NEWTON RAYZC),R, Chairman of the Board ba,RWORTH CORPORATION Cff \Y PAGE 2 a .1 I Agenda No.~~ Agondalte%~eF 46, THE STATE OF TEXAS t COUNT4' OF DENTON BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for Denton County, Texas, on this day personally appeared JESS NEWTON RAYZOR, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed '-.he same for the purposes and consideration therein exl~ essed. GIVEN under my hand and seal of office, this day o" December, A.D., 1992. I Notary Public In and For the State of Texas My Ca,umission Expires _ ~i PAGE 3 4 4 r AyandaNe.._,~ 'lJ. 1-- EXHIBIT "A" Apandallem ~ ta_lMl1`_t All that certain tract or parcel of liind situated in Denton County, Texas, Out of the Robert eeaLuront Survey, Abstract No, 31, and being a part of a 31,202 acre tract of land convpy4d to H. W, Down Development Co., Inc. by deed slated 4pril 240 1963, by John W. Porter and recorded in Volume 493, page 257 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and being more particu3Arly described as follower BEGINNZNa at a point'; in the West right of way line of Malone Street, said point being located North 1022'04" East, a distance of 7e,4 feet from the southeast corner of Lot No, 6 in Block XVI of North University Place, Third Section, an addition to the City of Denton, Texas, as re- corded in Vol. 4o' page 10 of the Plat Records of Denton a County, Texas, said beginning point being also the North- east corner of aforesaid Lot No. 6, Block XVI of North Ufti- varsity Place Aaditionr THS14CE North 89001131" West along the North line of ~ aforesaid Lot No. 6 in Block XV2 of North University Place Addition, a distance"of 118,97 feet to a point for corner in the East lane of a 16 foot utility easement along the West and of aforesaid Lot No. 6, Block XVI, said point being also located North 1U22'04" Lust, along the Lust line of said utility annamont, a distance of 10,16 feet from the I North line of aforesaid North university Placo', 't'hird Sections nMNCE North 1023'11" West along the East line of afore- said utility easement, a distance of 337,22 feet to a point for corners THENCE North 1022104" East, at a distance of 159.55 M feet passing the South boundary line of Auburn Drive, a street in North University Place Addition, Fourth Section, and continuing a total distanea of 209#57' feet to point for corner in the North line of Auburn Drrive, said point being,alse located in the South line of a 2.786 acre tract of land oonveyed to a, Newton Rayzor by H. W. Down- DeveIop- ment Co., Inc,r THENCE South 87008036" Baca along the North line of a proposed Easterly extension o-e Auburn Drive and the South line of aforesaid 2.786 acre tract, a distance of 90,91 feet to a point for corners TIMNCE North 47051'24" East, a distance of 35.36 feet to a point for corns it the East line of aforesaid 2,796 acre tract, said point being also located in the West right of way line of a proposed Northerly axtansion of. Malone street at the beginnning o:P a curve to the right, hniu a radius of 760,0 feet and a central angle of 15 52 30"t THENCE along the Wort line of said proposed Malone Street extension, same being along the arc of said curve to the right, a distance of 210,57 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve to the left, having a radius of 2293.00 feet, and 8, central angle of 36055'20"s THENCY4 continuing along the west line of said proposed Malone Street extension# same being along the arc of last mentioned curve to 4*'rte left, a distance of 196,11 root to a point for corner in the North line of aforesaid 31.202 acre tract, said corner point being located South 88027'56" East, a distance of 1".33.34 feet from the Northwest corner of said 32.202 acre tract, and adid point also being the Northeast corner or aforesaid 2.786 acre tratict; v r f! 5j i ti Agenda No. ' Agenda Item S ~ ~ f' f THENCE South 98"27'56" East along the North line of f aforesaid 31.202 acres, a distance of 258.66 feat to a point for corners said point being also the Northeast corner of a 4.4 acre tract of land convoyed by Louis Groaning to H. W. Down DeveloF.ment Co., Inc. by deed dated March 29, 19650 and shown of record in Vol, 521, page 200 of the 'Deed Records of Denton County, Taxast THENCE South 1008' West, a distance of 974.4 feat , to a point for corner in the North line of North university place Addition, Third section, and the South line of afore- raid 31..202 acrest THENCE North 88037'S6" Went along'4aid South line of aforesaid 31420 acres and North line of said North Univer- sity Place Addition, at a distance of 268.85 feet passing the East line of aforesaid Malone Street and continuing a total distance of 328.85 foot to a point for corner in the West line of said Malone Street and the Last line of afore- said Lot No. 6 in Block XVX of North University Place Additioni i TKxNCE North 01022104" East along }he Want line of aforesaid Malone Street, a distance of 10.711feet to the place of beginning, and containing 8.821 acres of land. Save and except 7.297 acres as shown by plat of the fifth section of North University Place Addition to the City of Denton, Texas as i filed originally in Volume 9, Page 22 Plat Records of Denton county, Texas, leaving 1,524 acres of land. 1 ~ i a: ` l fops 2 of Fxhibit. "A" 'r 5 , aj Z S• Y Agendaltenr_S F TWO THENCE South 89u27'56" East along the North line of aforesaid 31.202 acres, a distance of 256.66 feet tO a point for corners said point being also the Northeast corner c of a 4,4 acre tract of land conveyed by Louie aroening to H. w. Down Development Co., inc. by deed dated march 29, 1965, and shown of record in Vol. 521, page 200 of the 'Deed Records of Denton County, Texast THENCE South 1008' West, a distance of 974.4 feet to a point for corner in the North line of North University Place Addition, Third-Section, and the South line of afore- said 31,202 acrest THENCE North 88037' S6" West along "said South line of. aforesaid 31420 acres and North line of said North Univer- sity Place Addition, at a distance of 268,95 feet paasing the East line of aforesaid Malone street and continuing a { tonal distance of 328.95 feet to a point for corner in the West line of said Malone Stroh and the Fast line of afore- said Lot No. 6 in Block XVI of North University Place Additicrnr THENCE North 01022'04" East along the west line of aforesaid Malone Street, a distance of 10.7„feet to the place of beginning, and containing 8.822 acres of land. Save and except 7.297 acres as shown by plat of the fifth section of North University Place Addition to the City of Denton, Texas as filed originally in Volume 90 Page 22 Plat Records of Denton County, Texas, leaving 1.524 acres of land. a C Page 2 of Exhibit "A"" k `F r 4 v 41"1 - Ml =1 v CITY COUNCIL 9 IT: T T-T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 7 00oooooa0 aaD poo0oo0 - n p q v t Q C - - cC7S O _ C9oO ~ *yOOp, °G°0do4aooocooo°°~~ - IT T r:- { Sf J NT Cit ~gea~aNa. qj -o /J NOft7'H'1'hXASCOMMISSION gQf~nAallnlri ~J`1 1999 Board of DIr"fors 14Ittj Officers 'Robed B. Lane November 30, 1992 l~ t Chairman 'Erma C. Johnson Secretary 'C. H. Moore Treasurer 'Hal T. Thorns I Gonefal Counsel Dlrecter. The Honorable Bob Castleberry y The Offleersand Mayor Elaine B, Agalhar (,'it)' of Denton Leaser M. Albedhal, Jr. Jerry Alford Tc m Allen 215 Fast McKinney ' e4 Dennis Ballcl Denton, Texas 76201 " Steve Bartlett John 7. Chern, Jr. Winfred T. Colbert 'John F.Crawfoid Dear Mayor Castleberry: 'Oery w. Cumbfe Michael G. Eastman 'Jack W. Evans in early November you should have received a letter from me together with a Joe R. Ewen Key Granger booklet outlining a proposal by DFW Airport to amend the Texas Municipal DouglaiDiorwn h°rna Airports Act, Enclosed is a draft resolution supporting this amendment winch I John J. Hernandez hope your Council will consider, MlOiael Holden W, R. Howell LefeP, Jack Son As you know, there has been some recent progress in discussions between the oovoydJonnrngs City of Irving and DFW toward resolving their differences about the Mitigation Clark A. Johnson J. Polar Winn Program associated with the proposed airport expansion. However, the proposed Hfchard Knlgl,r, Jr. M, L. Kept State T e:gislative action is still necessary to reaffirm the authority of the Cities of M haolJ Mecerthy Dallas and Fort Worth, through the Airport Board, to develop, regulate, and zone LI=Mlnyard land use within the boundaries of DFW Airport, 'Cipriano R. Munoz James N, Muns ~na °A.Ovaroaah,Jr. I do hope your Council can consider this issue soon. It is obviously important for Joe K. Pace the region's cities to have expressed their opinion before the L gislature takes up Ronald , H.RO sLPoroll.Jrr. the issue in mid January. We will contact you shortly to see if additional Edward A, Potmon Paul WRAY, Jr. information is needed or if a briefing for your Council would be helpful, ' Malcolm S. Robinson M. J. noddguez, C.D.S. Telsuosakamolo Don't hesitate to call if you have questions or comments, 'T'hanks in advance for J, thomas Schlellar KimbedyJ.Wiopson your consideration, LIMA L. Sklles, Jr. D. Lynn Spruill ` Annolle5lrouss Sincerely, Vornel! Slums J. Michael Talhod Was M, Taylor Willlam E. 1'u0ke7 _ Torn Vandotgtifif J. William Wanrrch Directors EmerItUa Dean H. Vanderbilt 5ayardH.Friedman president E. L. Langley Preddenl Coon H. Varularbin DHV:pI 'Execuffve Comnriffae hulling Address; PA. Box 614246' DFW Aliport i Texas 75261 Street Address: 0445 Fronport Parkway , Sulto 640' Irving r Tamil , 75963 Telephone: 2141621.0400 (Metro) , 6001234.5699 s (Fax) 214!929.0916 t.4 va r~ it r. MA0106 ~g9nda Nn. - lt9rrL.!~'S 7fI Agenda i _x5 " 31 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE EFFORTS OF THE DALLAS FORT WORTH RPORT; AND OF HE DALLAS WORTH AAUTHORITY THE OACOBTAIN TIVITIESLEGISLATION AIRPORT HOARD OVER BOARD PROVIDING AN, EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the State LegislatL:e enacted the Texas Municipal ` Airports Act in 1947, which has been amended from time tO time thereafter) WHEREAS, on September z•r, 1965, the Cities f Hoard Dalland asunder Fort Worth establish the Dallas/ Worth Airport the sh, o erate, and im- ` Texas MunicipaleAirporta Act too plan, establt, p prove Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport; and WHEREAS, the Citios of Dallas and Fort Worth in a 1968 Agree-t authorized roceed Board the h the ofnthe Airport to be Jointly owned by the citiestof Dal asvfand Fort Worth and operated by the Airport Board; and ort was WHEREAS, Dallas/Fort 1974, Airpeen the Citiesfof I airline service ce in in January cities and two Dallas and Fort Worth, primar?.ly within four counties; and i International Airport h is as grown own to WHEREAS, Dallas/':Port; worth in the be the second busies' ai.rp°rtthe yearw2o00;tandy and to be the world's busiefjt by WHEREAS, Dallas/Fort. Wort.)( International Airport must expand to met the growing air traffic needs of the North Texas region, the State of Texas, and the antire national air transportation system; , f and DFW WHEREAS, after twenty years of growth and develop con rot its international Airport, the perBoard's mitted under the Texas municipal own land use and development l as challenged; and Airports Act is being ha WHEREAS, the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Hoard maintains that it must have the authority the traveling elop, ,and expand the Airport to ensure the safety publ to sotto maintain its competitiveness in the market, to meet the projected needs of the traveling air public, to protect 31,000 jobs and a $30 billion stimulus to the Taxas economy over a twenty year peviodt to stdm by the increase the capacity of snwhichalimpair actrthe oairlinesrtation an being traveling public, and to prevent developmental gridlock. Y , traveling to reduce delay c non-proprietor subject to the control of numerous independent non-prop cities; and i. W f ~ i n ' Agenda No. AdooeJaItem__ ee_ 1/N L._ ate _.1~ _1.~~2 WHEREAS, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board desires through a legislative initiative to reaffirm its authority provided to the Airport Board under the Texas Municipal Airport Act to con- + trol operations, development, and land use at Dallas/ Fort Worth International Airport; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY. RESOLVES: SECTION I. That th? City Council of the City of Denton sup- ports the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board's legisla- tive initiative to reaffirn. its authority under the Texas Municipal Airports Act to operate, develop, zone, and regulate land use at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. SECTION 11, That such legislation reaffirm Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board's power, in addition to all other pow- ers contained in the Act, to plan, acquire, establish, and develop, construct, enlarge, improve, maintain, equip, operate, regulate, zone, protect and police Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport and Its associated air navigation facilities and airport hazard areas, SECTION I11-L That such legislation reaffirm the right already expressly given to the Airport Board to acquire property, if so authorized by the City Councils of Dallas and Fort Worth, through eminent domain proceedings including those public roads and streets reasonably necessary for the operation and development of the Airport. USTIO V This resolution shall take effect immediately, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, 14AYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY r BYS e~ltkl PAGE 2 l r~ t 1 , w MMMU 1 C ITS . COUNCIL rrr III - - - - - - - - - - - - - O°U~p D~n D F O°° Q'~ N d4 p~y - .~QQQ°Q~ Pq N t 6{0~°O °00000 naooo°° T.- i A s" Aaft NO. --LZ-- r4 Rita ~ D CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMA DATE$ 12-15-92 T 1 TOt Mayor and Memberb of the City Council FROM$ Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUB.Yt Approval of a resolution supporting the funding of House Bill 791 which provides for a statewide system of poison control centers. RECOMMENDATION: The North Texas Poison Control Center recommends that citizens in north central Texas area support the funding of a statewide program to ensure the availability of the service. BA EGROUND7 During the past several months representatives from the North Texas Poison Control Center have visited local governments and hospitals throughout the north 1.0exas h area. The representatives have requested t►iat each I entity using the North Texas system pay an amount based on their use of the system in order to defray costs to the Dallas County Hospital District. At that time, the Hospital District and donations raised by Parkland Memorial Hospital fmiided the center, After the request from the center, Denton county voted to provide $5,000 dollars in funding for the center. The city of Denton, HCA Denton Hospital and the EPIC Healthcare Group (Denton Regional) did not allocate funding for the Center. SUMMARY: The passage of the resolution will demonstrate support for House Bill 791. This bill will appropriate funding for the statewide system of poison control centers, The authoriiiation legislation for the statewide system was passed 4uring the last legislative session. If approved, Community Development staff will forward a copy of the resolution to all State Legislators and Senators in order to further demonstrate the cityle support for HB 791. ` i 1 r. K d, a Yf d Report Format Aondak ! Page 2 AUvuIajWtL__1eS ,4 FROQg MS j DEPARTNENTS Q$._OROUPS AFFECTED: N/A FISCAL IMPACTS N/A r Respeotfully submitted:~ r o Harrell City Manager Prepared by$ Barbara Ross Community Development Administrator Approved Frank Robbins AICP Exeoutive Direotor for Planning i Development CCrfdd92,C0,1 t S F r 1 A C:lw,)d0CS\hb791ema.r Agenda fterrt. NO, A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS SUPPORTING THE FUNDING OF HOUSE BILL 791 PROVIDING FOR A STATEWIDE j SYSTEM OF POISON CONTROL CENTERS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 0 WHEREA,;, in an act relating to Emergency Medical Services, House Bill 791, the 71st Legislature of the State of Texas passed enabling legislation for the coordination and support of a state- vide system of poison and drug information services and the allo- cation of funding to support the creation and stabilization of such a system; and WHEREAS, a Texas Otate Poison control coordinating Committee was established by the ai)ove-mentiunod legislation and has a stated mission to establish and waintain a :state-wide poison control net- w7ck for the purpose of reducing incidence, severity and cost of poisoning: provide informational services to health care proles- F.lond.ls; and maximize available resources; and WHEREAS, the North Texas Poisc.n Center was established through a public/piivate partnership following a council of Governments study defining poicion control. as the raising part of a regional Emergency Medical Service system; and WHEREAS, the North Texas Poison Center has been receiving an increased volume of -all.s following the implementation of 9-1-1 state-wide and the increased awareneso of all Emergency Medical service providers of the importance of poison control centers offering Boo service; and WHEREAS, the increased cal;. volume has placed a staffing burden on the two regional centers in the state offeripq 900 service, creating a budgetary crisis endangering the continuation of that service; and WHEREAS, the North Texas Poison Con..*,er, which has since 1984 provided immediate life saving information to the citizens of the City of Denton, reducing the need for emergency transports and unnecesst:ry hospital admissions; and WHEREAS, sixty-three percent of the calls involve children under the age of six and it is our duty to protect our youngest population; NOW, THEREFORE, (f C t v. Ii i9 Y I A~endaltnm_. Rite THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SOMI-ON I. That the City Council of the City of Denton join the North Texas Poison Center and the Texas State Poison Control Coordinating Committee in encouraging the State Legislature to fiind the provisions of House Bill 7910 the enabling legislation for state support of a six center system of poison control, providing further economies for the citizens of Texas by reducing the neces- sity for higher cost emergency response and by providing equalized funding across counties served, by population. SECT ON II. That this resolution shall become effective immediately after its passage and approval. , PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR 1 ATTEST: l JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY 1 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: - PAGE 2 4 i r v 'CITY COUNCIL A 1 ' o r o ~iooc' ~ COtii H ~pp.. _ U ' Q - . b O m ~ p?O . pGppro k to+~0~ ~~~pQ nGO~~~~ TITT, r, WMW-,Xrr -'W--T ~f S~ Agenda No. Date CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Resolution for Revision to Harassment. Policy (7.08.10) k ;<tEC9MJ~'NDA .LOINR: It is the staff's recommendation to approve a resolution to adopt r'M a new, revised Harassment Prevention policy (108.10). The nevi- ' dons will add a prohibition on harassing behavior, comments or jokes, and activities that are offensive regarding age and disability status. SUMMARY., In 1987, the City Council adopted a policy prohibiting harassment in regards to race, ethnic background, religion, and gender. The revisions to the harassment policy are to protect individuals who are covered under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. PROGRAMS, DEp TMENTS OR GROSJPS AFFEQTQ! 'Phis policy affects all employees (including managers and supervisors) and would become effective upon Council approval. FI SgALI IMPACT: None Respec:,fully submitted: i Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: A ppro d by: Thomas 1 nck, Director B , xerut ve D rector Human Resources Municipal a vices/ Economic Developmen t I` APP002B5 f" "4. ss. y ALL003C0 Aped+1~0._--~-~ - Age* Item- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A POLICY REGARDING HARASSMENT PREVENTION; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Director of the Human Resources for the Cite of Denton has presented a proposed policy regarding employee harass., I meet prevention for the Council's consideration; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt such policy as an official policy regarding employment with the City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVESt „ gECTION I. The following Policy, attached hereto and made a part hereof is hereby adopted as an official policy of the City of Denton, Texas: 108.10 Harassment Prevention SECTION II. The previous policy relating to harassment (Ref- erence No. 102,08), adopted by Resolution of this Council on December 1, 1987 is hereby rescinded, SECTION III. That if any section, subsection, pars raph sentence, clause, phrase or word in this resolution or policy, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby declares it would have enacted such, remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SEC` ON I~ The foregoing policy is attached hereto and mode a part ho reof and shall be filed in the official records with the City Secretary. ' PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992, BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR y ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY, t ti ti AgendoNo. Agenda Item 5 CITY OF DENTON D3te_ /A PAGE•`J_OF 3 POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE SECTION: REPERTJNCE NUMBERr HUMAN N RESOURCES DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: 108. 10 EFFECTIVE DATE, STANDARDS OF CONDUCT TrrLE: 1.2 15 92 R8PLACES: HARASSMENT PREVENTION 12/01/87 / POLICY STATEMENTI try"' It is the policy of '..he City of Denton to prohibit any form of sexual, racial, disability, age, and religious harassment of municipal employees or ethnic, applicant e, City of Denton recognizes that sexual, racial, ethnic and religious harassment isTheae violation of federal and state laws. The City maintains a strict policy that harassment, whether sexual, racial, ethnic, or religious in nature, or directed toward one's age or disability status, in the work place, is not acceptable and will not be tolerated. All employees, including managers, supervisors, and representatives of the i City are expected to refrain from exhibiting any unwelcome behnvior or displaying conduct toward any other employee which could be interpreted as harassment. 1 DEFINITIONSt The definitions listed below are in accordance with the guidelines adopted by the Equal Employment opportunity Coramissicn, I, Sexual Harassment - Unwelcomed sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal (slurs, jokes) or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitute sexual harassment when: a. submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of employment; or b. SubmierLon to or rejection of such conduct by nn individual is used as the basis for employment decislonn affecting the indivldualr or t c. Such conduct has the purpose or effect of interfering with an individual's performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environmenL•. Examples include; 1. Unwelcome sex-oriented verbal "kidding;" 2. Unwelcome teasing or jokes; 3. Subtle pressure for sexual activity; 4. Physical contact such as patting, pinching or constant brushing against another's body] or. S. Demands for sexual favors. II. Ethnic/Racial Harassment - Ethnic or racial slurs or jokes, and other verbal or physical conduct relating to an individual's national origin or race constitute harassment when this conducts a. Has the purpoa-e or effect of croating an intimidating, hostile, or off-ansive working environment; or i b. Has the purpose ov effect of interfering with an individual's work performance, I , ti (f ends No. lteitt Agenda CITY OF DENTON PAGE 1 OF 3 POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE _ SECTION; REFERENCE NUMBER: HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT 108.10 SUBJECT: EFFECTP"E DATE: STANDARDS OF CONDUCT 12/15/92 i TITLE: REPLACES; HARASSMENT PREVENTION 12/01/87 POLICY STATEMENTS 4 It is the policy of the City of Denton to prohibit any form of sexual, racial, ethnic, disability, age, and religious harassment of municipal employees or applicants. The City of Denton recognizes that sexual, racial, ethnic and religious harassment is a violation of federal and state laws. The City maintains a strict policy that h harassment, whether sexual., racial, ethnic, or religious in nature, or directed toward one's age or disability status, in the work place, is not acceptable and will not be tolerated. All employees, including managers, supervisors, and representatives of the City are expected to refrain from exhibiting any unwelcome behavior or displaying conduct toward any other employee which could be interpreted as harassment. DEF'INITIONSt I~ The definitions listed below are in accordance with the guidelines adapted by the;:qual 1 Employment Opportunity Connission. 11 1. Sexual Harassment - Unwelcomed sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal (slurs, jokes) or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitute sexual harassment when: E a. Submission to such conduct Is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of employment) or b. Submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting the individual) or c. Such conduct has the purpose or effect of interfering with an individual's performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment. Examples includes 1. Unwelcome sex-oriented verbal 'kidding;" 2. Unwelcome teasing or jokeel 3. Subtly) pressure for, sexual activity; 4. Physical contact- such as patting, punching or constant brushing against another's body or 5. Demands for sexual favorc. 11. Ethnic/Racial Harassment - Ethnic or racial slurs or jo).f,,s, and other verbal or physical conduct relating to an individual's national nsigin or race constitute harassment when this conducts a. Has the purpose or effect of creating an intimidating, hnutile, or offensive working environment; or b. Has the purpose or effect of interfering with an individual's work performance. t t x r 1--~~ - _--•~t: - i 'J t . i SS '1 s; f s Agenda ltem_Z ' # 7 C "all PAGE 2 OF 3lQ- A - POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (Continuew TULE; REFERENCE NUMBER; HARASSMENT PREVENTION 108.10 i III. Religious Harassment - Religioun slurs or jokes, and other verbal or physical conduct relating to an individual's religious beliefs constitute harassment when the conducts r I a. Has the purpose or effect of creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment) or b. Has the purpose or effect of interfering with an individual's work performance. IV. Disability Harassment - Slurs or jokes, or physical conduct directed towards an indiv:.dual's disability status may constitute harassment when the conducts a. han the purpose or effect of creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environments or b. has the purpose or, eeffect of interfering with an individual's work performance. NOTES Disability means, with respect to an individual, a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or mono of the major life activities of such individual, as such term Is defined in the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 USC 121021 a record of such an impairmenti or being regarded as having such an impairment. This would include, but not be limited to, an individual with a lose of limb, visual impairment, mobile impairment (wheelchair bound, artificial limb, etc.), eight impairment (blindness), hearing impairment (deafness), medical conditions such as heart disease, epilepsy, muscuiar dystrophy, cancer, mental illness, alcoholism, HIV disease, and other physical and mental medical conditions which are protected by Federal law. V. Age Harassment - Slurs or jokes, and other verbal, non-verbal, or physical conduct directed toward an individual's age status, may constitute harassment when the conducts A a. has the purpose of effect of creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive I working environment) or b, has the purpose or effect of interfering %ith an individual's work performance. An individual's intentions and motives are not the decisive factors in conside•:ing alleged harassment behavior. The effect of one employee's behavior upon another employee is the decisive factor. If an individual's behavior is considered to be offensive by another individual or if it has an intimidating effect upon another individual, sexual, racial, ethnic, or religious harassment or harassment towards one's age or disability may be present. AUMiNISTRATIVE PROCEDCRESs C. P.aoh supervisor is responsible for maintaining his or her work place free of sexual, racial, ethnic, and religious harassment or harassment directed toward one's disability or age otatus. Thio duty includes discussing and enforcing this policy and procedure with all employees and assuring them that they are not i' required to endure insulting, degrading, or exploitative treatment. a s. - - 4 , li 1 f) Agenda No Agendalteir~ PACE_ 3 OF 3 N16 _.__'4 POLICY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE /ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (Conti uss ~ Tr3'LH: REPPI'•HNCH NUMBER; HARASSMENT PREVENTION 108.10 i ii. individuals who experience harassment shall make it clear that such behavior is offensive to them. Any employee who feels that he or she has been the victim of sexual, racial, ethnic, or religious harassment or harassment relating to his I or her disability or age should immediately report the facts of the incident or incidents and the names of the individuals involved to his or her supervisor and n the Di:eoLor of Human Resources or designee. Should the immediate supervisor be the offending party, the employee must report the alleged act to the next level of management and the Director of the Human Resources Department or designee. In situations where the employee is not comfortable reporting the allegation to his/her immediate supervisor or the next level of management, he/she has the option to report only to the Director of Human Reaources or st designee. The Director of Human Resources and the manager/supervisor are mutually responsible for notifying each other when an allegation is reported. III. All allegations of harassment observed by or reported to a supervisor must be investigated immediately by the Human Resources tirector or designee. All findings, decisions, and recommendations will be made on an individual basis considering the record as a whole on the totality of the circumstances, such as the nature of the behavior and the context in which the alleged incidents occurred. if harassment is found to exist., appropriate management and supervisory personnel shall take prompt corrective action. Anytime that sexual harassment becomes an issue of an alleged act of sexual assault, the invostigation must be coordinated with the City of Denton Police Department. I IV. Appropriate disciplinary action will be taken when the findings warrant such action. Such disciplinary action should be determined by the nature of the wrongful act or acts and may result in immediate dismisea). V. Disclosure of any investigation conducted under this policy shall be made only to those city employees and others with a right to know. VI. The City's Problem Solving Policy #115.02 encourages employees to report any alleged infraction without fear of retaliation. The City of nenton supports the State of Texas Retaliation Act, Policy #108.06, which proteeta a public employee who reports an alleged violation of the law. AAA0OAD9 12/11/91. j ~i `h f 7 ta L ~D CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL f3UILDING / 215 fr, McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 M E M O R A N D U M t TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager. FROM: Bill Angelo, Director of Community Services DATE: December 14, 1992 SUBJECT: BROADCAST OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS I The FY 11,92-93 Community Services Department- budget includes $38,903 for the purchase of equipment to support both the broadcast of City Council meetings and other broadcast efforts of the proposed City Cable Channel. 'T'hese purchases will be funded through a $60,000 grant from Sammons Communications to the City as required by the City's Cable Franchise Agreement with Sammons. f As described in the FY 1993 budget proposal and other memoranda, l the City Channel. will allow for the live, two camera broadcast: of City Council. meetings as well as a variety of taped broadcasts and in-house productions. The live broadcast of City Council meetings will require $28,374 for the purchase of two cameras, cables, , lighting kits, monitors, and headsets, in addition, an audio/video switching device ($4,595) will. be necessary as well as a vertical organizer ($600) to accommodate the monitors and switching device and provide a work area for. the director, Staff. also anticipates the purchase of supplemental items, such as cable extenders and hard carrying cases to facilitate and protect equipment during transfer. To operate the cameras during Council broadcasts, the Department's budget also provides $2,482 for the hiring of two interns, .probably through the Radio/'I'V Department at UNT. In exchange for the use of the two cameras at its proposed video production studio at the Moore Building, the Policc Department will provide the services of one of its officers who has extensive experience in video prodt,c- t:ion to direct each Council broadcast, This will save the City the 11792C/1 8171666.8200 D/!=W METRO 434-2529 i C. V j BROADCAST OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS December 14, 1992 Page 2 expense of hiring an outside director and allow for greater production latitude. Broadcast. of Council meetings will require approximately ten (10, hours per month of t;be officer's time. At a cost of $20.34 per hour including benefits, monthly cost would equate to $203.40 with annual costs estimated at $2,440.80. This cost will be borne by the Police Department-, budget in exchange for equipment usage. Obviously, some type of backup system will be developed to cover for those instances whenever primary personnel are not available. This function will be covered by the Community Services Administra- tion staff within existing budget limits. As originally proposed in the budget, the broadcast of City Counca.l meetings was anticipated as only one component of the City Channel's operation throughout the year. Other components would consist of a public bulletin board and live and taped departmental broadcasts. To broadcast the public bulletin board, funds were budgeted to purchase a text scanner ($5,200) which would be operated by the City personnel for a few minutes each day. The bulletin board would offer the City an additional medium for timely dissemination of both reneral. and emergency information to its citizens. As stated abova, the channel's cameras and support equipment will be made available for use by the Police Department's Moore Building studio when not in use for City Council broadcasts. In turn, City departments will be able to use the studio for live or taped productions. Although the equipment itemized above will produce both quality Council meeting and departmental broadcasts, the City may wish to consider the purchase of additional audio/visual equipment to enhance broadcast. quality. If approved, such purchases would be funded from the Sammons grant fund balance. Such equipment would , F include an audio board addition to the switcher to enhance broadcast sound quality; an audio recorder module and batteries for the cameras to allow for the taping of productions in the field; camera conversion kits to allow for more fluid manipulation of the cameras during broadcasts; and, remoto controls to allow for the director's control of camera settings during studio productions. Prices for the foregoing equipment are not yet firm. However, the total for these acquisitions can be accommodated within the grant-, I1792C/2 c t, i 11 till, Re F ;s it i:R•M19.9A .5 j q tw BROADCAST OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS December 14, 1992 Page 3 fund balance of $21,231 which will remain after the initial equipment purchases. Respectfully submitted, Bi 1 Angelo e i il'192C/'s a i ~ ~ 1 IWO 1 n HANDOUT TO COUNCIL -12-'15-92 BILES & LOCK, P.C. ' ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS A'r LAW 512 W. HICKORY, SUITE 220 P.O. BOX 949 DENTON, TEXAS 76202 (817) 566.0566 DAVID W. BtLrs -t PAL-1,, A. Locx + Deeciaber l5. 1992 Lloyd Harrell, City Manager Denton Municipal Building 215 Fast McKinney Denton, T exas 76201 Ile: City Council Consideration of D/FW Airport Resolution a?' Lloyd: I have noted that the agenda for tonight's City Council Meeting provides for the consideration of a resolution regarding D/FW Airport Expansion vis a v!s the controversies with the Cities of Urap,:vinc, Euless, and Irving, I have mentioned to Mayor Castlelmrry and Councilmembers Brock and Smith that the I 'namber of Commerce will be holding a town hall meeting of sorts in January at which representatives of both sides of the D/F W Airport issue will be making presentations, E ~ By way of background, on December 3 the Local Affairs Committee adopted by consensus a resolution for recommendation to the Chamber Board, the thrust of which urged the Legislature to clarify the Texas Municipal Airports Act. During the meeting I was concerned that perhaps there was all insufficient understanding of the particulars of the two sides of the issue. Therefore, the resulting resolution was essentially neutral, expressing a desire to have the enabling legislation cleared up. Subsequent to the meeting, I have received A offers to participate in a town hall meeting on the issue from representatives of the Airport Board and from the Mayor of Urapevine. I feel this is the apprc :iate manner tc, proceed. 't'herefore, I am attempting to make arrangements for such. a meeting in mid-January to which invitations will be extended to the Chamber's Local Affairs Committee, State Relations Committee, and Board of Directors. Invitations will also be extended to City Council members and appropriate City staff (this will be a Chamber-initiated gathering and shor,ld not be affected by the Open Meetings requirements;. Please note that the timing will coincide with tine mid-January timeline anticipated by all parties insofar as commencing efforts in Austin once the legislature convenes, Council may wish to avail themselves of this oppurtunity to hear more (and hopefully accurate) information on the issue before under,aking consideration of the resolution. HOARD CERT114FI) FAMILY LAW, TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL. SPECIALIZA-110N t MEMBER: COLLEGE OF THE STATE BAR OP TEXAS t t r :Ia : hxeMr}~) 1 December 14, 1992 Lloyd Harrell, City Manager DIFW Airport Resolution Town Hall Meeting In order to accommodate access for physically challenged members of the Chamber and the community, I would like to discuss the possibility of using the Council Chambers on a mutually convenient evening the week of January 18th from 5;15 p.m. to approximately 8 p.m. Please let me know at your earliest convenience regarding these matters. As is always the case as we endeavor to forge a stronger partnership between the City and the Chamber, your assistance is appreciated. ')inter I l _ U L. / X t David W. Giles DWB,Ig i cc; Chuck Carpenter Carl Anderson lion. Bob Castleberry A l C ~ 4 ~.+r-fir ~ - __y - ..f , J HANDOUT TR COUNCIL -•12-15-•92 Or IrV11g December 11, 1942 ;;El 1 REC'0 t Re: Legislative Proposal to Negatively Affect A City's Right to Zone Property and Exercise Its Sovereignty Within Its Boundaries Dear Colleague: o ; We are the City Managers of the Cities of Grapevine, Euless and Irving and are writing this letter to all City Managers across the state to advise each of you of proposed legislative action that is threatening our three cities and might also adver W.y affect; your ' ability to manage and regulate your city. The legislative effort is being pushed by the DFW Airport Board, the Cities of Dallas and Fort Worth and the major airlines that use DFW Airport. Although DPW Airport is located within our cities, boundaries and we have had an ongoing compatible relationship for 20 years, that relationship has now been shattered, the spirit of cooperation has been withdrawn by DFW Airport, and we have each been sued by DPW Airport Board and the Airlines. They contend that our ordinances are null and void as they might relate to DFW Airport. They also contend that the,, can purchase any property within our cities (with which we agree, so long as it is a voluntary transaction) and when It icj purchased by Dallas and Fort Worth, the DPW Airport Board can use it in any way it wishes (with which we disagree). They also -ontend they can condemn and assume control of our public street#:, even to the extent of closing or relocating streets. Our cities, without warning or conversation, were sued by the DFW Airport Board, which was then joined in the lawsuit by American Airlines, Delta Air Tines and United Parcel Service. The central issue was: Could our cities continue to zone property, regulate land uses and control the streets and roadways within our cities' respective boundaries, even though the properties might be purchaaed by Dallas and Fort Worth and turned over to their appointees, the DFW Airport Board? The District Court of Dallas County ruled against DFW Airport Board and in favor of our cities. All of those parties have appealed the court's decision but in the meantime, have announced their intention to have the Legislature change the law to suit their desires. c By way of background information, the Dallas/Fort Worth Airport is located almost exclusively within the boundaries of our citiev. We have enforced zoning and land use powers at the Airport even before it was constructed and completed in 1974. The Airport Board has, for the past 20 years, sought and obtained the full cooperation from our cities through actions such as the abandonment of streets and roadways on Airport properties, the approval of numerous zoning requests by the Airport or its tenants, and the adoption by ordinance of DFW Airport Board rules and regulations to make them enforceable at the Airport; in fact, there has never been a denial of a DFW Airport request by any of our cities. This spirit of whicooperation has existed between the Ajr,,I~rt Board and the s, cooperation en bled the DFW Airport to prosper and becomaithe second busiest airport in the country, " In 1989, the A3.rport Board announced a "new" Master Plan and a 3, billion expansion of the Airport. (It now a $ 5 one Dallas, Fort Worth, nor any of the Air i nesr canlaffordasuch a debt and the only things realistically being sought are modifications to boarding gates and two new runways,) The two new full service air carrier runways would have their flight paths directly over commercial, church and residential developments, all of whicl, either previously existed or had been constructed in good faith and in reliance upon the Airport's Original Master Plan, which did = include these two runways. In Irving, numerous businesses and some 20,000 residents arse directly and negatively impacted, In Euless, some 5,000 residents are faced with the same devastation. In Grapevine, the entire downtown area, including the Historic District, which is on the V',~tiona~ Reaist~~ 0 now convention center, the new library, churches and somet12,500 residences are negatively impacted. DFW's answer is that they are offering "the greatest mitigation program in history." This may be so, but there hrts never been such potential devastation and over one-half of those tieing negatively impacted are being totally ignored. In addition to the individual owners issuestof DFW bulldoozingsliterally thundreds of homes, mufaced with ltifamily units and business developments with the attendant loss of tax revenues. Our school districts are faced with population relocation with schools remaining in the high noise contours. Our recreation centers and park lands in those areas are faced with uncertainty. Streets, along with water and sewer lines taken over by DFW, would now be under a ";foreign" control. As you know, when a community decides to adopt a home-rule charter pursuant to the Texas Constitution, it assumes that the city will be able to decide for itself horn the city will be run, including the inalienable right to determine how land will be used within its boundaries. The people in Texas in 1912 adopted the home-rule provisions to the Constitution so that each city could decide its own destiny. The legislation would abolish not only the decision 2 - Y. I„ made by the people in eac',4 home-rule city, but also the decision made by the voters in 1912. In 1967, a constitutional amendment was approved, allowing Dallas and Tarrant counties to create the 4.! North Texas Regional Airport Authority which, if approved, would have broad and superior authority. However, the people voted "no" to the creation of such an authority. Therefore, Dallas and Fort Worth were faced with the necessity of building and operating the Airport under the provisions of the Texas Municipal Airports Act. We agree that the Texas Municipal Airports Act allows Dallas and Fort Worth to build and operate an airport. We do not want to operate this Airport and have never sought such authority. But, as the District Court in Dallas stated, the "Host Cities" (Grapevine, Irving and Euless) are not preempted by state or federal law from enforcing their zoning ordinances within their boundaries and that the most Qitiss have exclusive dominion over their public streets and roadways. The court's ruling was based upon the simple, yet fundamental sovereign' right of a home-rule city to be protected from invasion by any other city or entity, even if t;iat entity In a rich group of airlines. Under the proposed legislation, the City of Dallas, for example, could come into any city in Texas, condemn land, build an airport, and have exclusive authority to zone, develop and regulate that airport in tot.21 disregard of the invaded cities' zoning ordinances, master plan, residential development or local way of life. The health, safety and welfare of citizens would be decided by outside interests. Also, it is contended that land purchased would be tax-exempt. The WW Airport has grown and prospered by complying with the citica' zoning ordinances. There is no reason why it cannot continue to prosper, while at the same time continuing to comply with these zoning ordinances. To data, the DFw Airport hes rafus2d 11 to el+!&_f11s a zoning Agglicat;on with the c+r;.■o but rather, without notice, had the sheriff serve all of the cities with citr,tions, contending that. all city ordinances were null and void, as they related to I&V Airport. This legislation is a eonertorn for all cities whether they be home- rule or general law, big or small, or have an airport within their boundaries, because it would set an extremely dangerous precedent of having the Legislature decide on a local issue and how cities in Texas would be managed.. Ntsd, if a disgruntled party lest a lawsuit with a citys the precedent would be for them to go to Austin and "win" their lawsuit by gutting the Wgislaturi to change the law. As City Managers, we have ,he responsibility to carefully and reasonably manage the development and growth of our cities in pursuit of the policies established by our City Councils. We have and can continue to do this, even with the Airport in our cities, but we ce,n not effuctively and knowledgeably manage our city when 3 - c 4 r. 1 +l t I k some outside interest is allowed to take control and mandate what we must do. We anticipate that you will be contacted by the Airport, the r Airlines and others, asking you to support this proposed / legislation which could rob your city of its constitutional right to self-government. We strongly urges you to reject their advances because the threat to your city's sovereignty greatly outweighs vague promi3se of economic development for the Dallas/Fort worth area. This legislation, if adopted, will begin a dangerous era when special interest groups will ask for special treatment from the Legislature by allowing thew to invade your city and ignore your hari fought efforts to provide the very best way of life for your residents. This meter is not limitod solely to an airport but involves all cities in the State of Texas. Please help us to stop this effort in its tracks. Thank you for giving these issues your consideration, if you would + like to diucuss this matter in greater detail or need further information, please do not heoitate to call. Sincerely, CITY OF IRVING 7 J .k Huf man, t;y Manager 14) 721-26 CITY OF EULESS Tom Hart, C ty Manager (817) 685.1422 CITY OF GRAPE Tree Pet (817) 481-03 eager