Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-08-1992 j 1 1 NefldoNo, ApWa hem. AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL December 8, 1992 v9 I, Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, December 8, 1992 at 5:15 p.m. In the Civil Defense Room of City Ball, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: NOTE: Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may also be considered as part of the Agenda for the Regular Session. 5:15 p.m. 1. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Consider action in in e: Flpw. 2. consider action in s it v. City. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art, 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1, consider an appointment to the Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission. 2. Receive a report and hold a discussion with the 191 committee regarding improvements to the Martin Luther King, Jr.. Recireation Center and sidewalk projects and give staff direction. 31 Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding the day care licensing of Martin Luther King, Jr. Recreation Center's Kid Connection Program, and 'the transfer of the program to After School as an After School Action Site under the management of the Children's Programs Supervisor. 4. Receive a repori:, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding the City council's concerns regarding the addition of an Enrichment Program for the Parks and Recreation Department's After school Programs. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, December 8, 1992 at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denison, Texas at which the following items will be considered: 1. Pledge of Allegiance Agenda No. AgendaItem._..__ w~-..._._._.__. City of Denton City Council Agenda December 8, 1992 Page 2 2. Consider approval of the minutes of the Regular Session of November 10, 1992, and the joint session of November 16, 1.992 with the Denton independent School District Board of Trustees. 3. Presentation of the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award as an "Especially Notable Communication Device" from the Government Finance officers Association of the United States and Canada for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1992. 4. Citizen Reports A. Receive a citizen report from Tommy Richardson regarding the Denton Youth Football Association. 5. Public Hearings A. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance approving a rezoning of a 32.045 acre tract of land from the Agricultural District to the Single Family- 10 District, with conditions, SF-10(c), on property located on the east side of Country Club Road, approximately 920 feet south of Hobson Lane. Z-92-023 ('t'he Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval with conditions 6-1 at its meeting of November 11, 1992.) I B. Hold a public hearing concerning amending the sign ordinance and give staff direction. C. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption traf of ordinance approving the rezoning of a 77.6 acre land from the Planned Development District to thu Agricultural FM Dstrict on one-half mile north east of -92-028 (The Planning and Zoning Commission Ryan Road. Z-92-028' recommended approval 7-0 at its meeting of November 11, 1992.) D. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance approving a request to rezone 10.0868 acres to a conditioned General Retail District. The tract is located on the north-northwest side of Mayhill 'toad, adjacent to the MK&T Railroad tracks. Z-92-026 'The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 4-0 at its meeting of October 281 1992.) i I ✓1 4 Awdo No. Awida City of Denton City Council Agenda December 8, 1992 C Page 3 E. Hold a public hearing to consider a variance request on behalf of Schneider & Justice, Inc., for East Oaks Addition - Phase III, The request is to exempt the applicant from the Subdivision Regulation requirement of Sec. 34-124, Paragraph f-3, pertaining to drainage regulations. The 6,697 acre site is located north of McKinney Road, east of Audra Lane and is accessed by Timber Trail Road. V-63 (The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval 5-0 at its meeting of December 2, 1992,) F. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance approving the rezoning of a 6,033 acre tract of + land from the Planned Development District to the Office District on property located northwest of N. Bonnie Brae and west of Oak Street, also known as the Vintage Retirement Community. Z-92-029 (The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval 7-0 at its meeting of November 11, 1992.) 6. Consent Agenda I h Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the city Manager or hia designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. Listed below are bids and purchases orders to be approved for payment under the ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back- up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 7.A, 7.8, 7.C, 7.D, 7.E, 7.F). This listing is provided on the consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss or withdraw an item prior to approval of the Consent Agenda. Upon the receipt of a ConsenttAgendspeak" the item shall be removed randrbenconsan item on the idered before approval of the Consent Agenda. A. Bids and Purchase orders; 1. Bid #1429 - CDBG Sidewalk Repair Program 2. Bid #1442 - Fully Insured Managed Care Health Insurance Program 3. P.O. #31330 - Xerox 4. P.O. #31359, #31360, #31361, #31395 - Xerox 5. P.O. #31331 - Bobby V. Gray/EIS Support Services 64 P.O. #31332 - Weston Consulting 7. check Requisition - Texas Water Commission Agenda No. Agenda Item__ to- City of Denton City Council Agenda 171 / l December 8, 1992 Page 4 B. Plats and Replats 1. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of Lot 21 Block A, Exposition Mills, being a 1.609 acre tract of land located on the east side of I-35N, approximately 200 feet south of Loop 288 and a Comprehensive Pedestrian Access Plan. (The Planning and zoning commission recommends approval.) 2. Consider the preliminary plat of. Lot 1, Block A, and Lot 1, Block B, of the D. Lombard Addition, The 10.0868 acre tract is located on the north- northwest side of Mayhill road, adjacent to the f MK&T railroad tracks. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval). 7. Ordinances A. consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and awarding a contract for purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services, (6.A,4.- P.O. #313590 #31360, #31361, #31395) I B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. (6.A,1. - Bid #1429) C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for purchases of materials or equipment which are available from one source in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. (6.A,3. - P.O. #313300 6.A.7. - Texas Water Commission Check Requisition) D. consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement with Bobby V. Gray d.b,a. EIS Support Services for personnel services relating to annual maintenance of the EIS (payroll) software. (6.A.5, - P.O. #31331) E. consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement with Weston Consulting for personnel services relating to annual maintenance of the CTS (Customer Service Utility Billing) software, (6.A.6. P.O. #31332) Agenda No. ltam_.~ - Agenda Council Agenda S~ City of Denton City Decembe=r 81 1992 Page 5 F. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the Mayor insurance. (6 A., 2. BBi` execute employee agreement hewith alth Philaelhia can City of Denton #1442) H. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an agreement providing for the lease of office space at 324 East McKinney Street. 81 Resolutions A. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement between the City of Denton and the City of Corinth for the impoundment and disposition of dogs and cats. B. Consider approval of a resolution encouraging the Texas i Department of Transportation to continue in its efforts to insure t continued 35 to U. Se Highway 77exit ramp from Interstate Highway 9. Consider appointments to the Airport Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission and t A'irport Board each recommends three members for. appointment, 10. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. 11. Official Action on Execu-rive session Itemst A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 12. New Business This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 13. Executive Session: A, Legal. Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T,S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252--1.7 V.A.T.S, C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. A~ondaNo. Agondalt~ lz City of Denton CitY Council Agenda December 8, 1992 Page 6 C E R T I F I C A T E that the. above notice of meeting was ported on the I certify Hall of the City o T S( o bulletin board aof the City of Denton, Texas, an 1992 at the _ CITY SECR~- FTAR THE CCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT L THE NOTE: A CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE AIRED IV LEAST 48 IN HEARING IMP, ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULEDQMEETING AT PLEASE CALL THESCITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 566-809 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEC C ES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX SO 'r A SIGN LANGUAGE 5INTERPRETER CAN DE SCHEDULED CITY THE THROUGH ACCOOODI :CITX TTM COUNCIL x T"m . TTT - QOOD~n ogr D ~ ~ooo - O~O~y HA ~0.. O ~ 0 ~e. mop a n O o O.: ooooo~oo o M , ~ oooO~C eO oava nr - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - q: WHAT-H =mad f A agendaNo• _ 2-.J;~ • ate - CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 568.8307 Office of the City Manager MLMG~RANI7UM TOs Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager- FROM: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager DATES December 3, 1992 SUBJECT: 191 Committee Report On Thursday, November 12, 1992, the 191 Committee met to discuss funding for the MLK improvements that the Council referred to them, The staff gave the Committee the same information that the Council received about the phased approach to the improvements indicating that there would be a maximum $300,000 cap. The Committee thought using the phased approach was a prudent path to follow and recommended the use of existing rec center bonds, You will also note in the back up that the Committee recommended spending the last sidewalk money, Staff suggested several areas for improvement, The Committee thought it was appropriate to spend the money for sidewalk improvements since that was where the money was originally allocated. They also felt these projects were appropriate since most of them were tied to projects that had some form of improvement made to them with bond funds, If you or the Council has any questions, I would be happy to try and answer them, otherwise, we look forward to discussing this item with you at the meeting, Rick Sve a Deputy City Manager RSsbw AMM001FL Attachment I i Agen~falterrz___w:S,~ CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILD1N0 / DENTON, TEXAS 7620f / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8307 Office of the City Manager M E MQ R.F9 N I~ iJM TO: '91 Committee FROMI Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager DATEI November 10, 1992 /Y SUHJECTI Meeting Scheduled for Thursday, November 12, 1992, at 5:30 p,m, in the City Manager's Conference Room h~ I First of all, thank you all for agreeing to meet on such short notice. The last time we met we told you these meetings would be few and far between, and I still think that is the case. We wanted to talk to you just a little bit about a couple of items. The first of those is the MLR Recreation Center, As you no doubt read from the paper or heard us talk about before, ever since MLR has been built, we have experienced problems with humidity in the building and water seepage underneath the building. At the last Council meeting, tho Council was briefed on solutions to both of these problems, Tho building management staff has reviewed the suggestions of the architect and are in full agreement that these solutions must be pursued, There are a number of solutions to be incorporated to fix these two problems in the building, and the architect has provided a staged approach to attack the problem. If all stages are required, the total cost would be about 530010001,, As mentioned, the Council reviewed this at their last meeting along with the recommendations from staff that the rec bond funds be used for these repairs, Clearly, the solutions are not maintenance types of items; rather., long term solutions that should have been considered with the building design in the beginning. Therefore, using long term financing is appropriate. The Council thought that this was a reasonable solution, Currently, unearmarked funds of approximately $1 million remain in this fund, and Council asked that you be briefed about the funding plan which could remove up to about $300,000 from this balance, I will be able to bring information about the solutions with me to the Committee meeting and will be happy to try and answer any questions you might have at any time, 3 np~ad~Na f 1 91 Committee November 10, 1992 Page 2 The second issue we wanted to talk to you about is continued clean up of left over bond monies in particular categories, I have attached a memo from Jerry Clark's area that suggests approximately $30,000 worth of sidewalk removal and repair. Jerry has advised me that this is the remnants of the last monies that were set aside for sidewalks. Again, we were aide to bring a number of other projects in under contract prices which enabled us to have this money left, over. Most of these projects are adjacent to either street or drainage bond projects that have been completed or will be completed very shortly. The only exception to this is Fulton Street. Fulton was repaved with street maintenance money rather „ than bond fund money. However, because of its adjacent location to r the Denton West campus and Calhoun Junior High, we think it is also an appropriate candidate. If these projects were recommended, we would take those back to the Council also. This would then use up the remaining sidewalk money. Because of their length and size, there in not a real easy way for us to include them in our regular street maintenance activities. Again, I would be happy to try and answer any questions you might have on these particular projects. Finally, I wanted to also mention to you that in the coming months there will in all likelihood be a need for the staff to call you together again. You may have read that we have a new federal highway bill called ISTEA which stands for Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. In that bill, funding resources were reallocated, and the staff has just participated in a major reshuffling effort for all of our highway projects. The good news is that most of our bond projects are still in the program. Further good news Is that we were able to garner a number of other projects that basically have to do with traffic congestion and air quality kinds of issues, They are essentially turn lanes at intersections, signal retiming, signal installation and the like. These kinda of projects will help us move traffic and increase capacity throughout the city. The bad news is that we did lose one highway project that was in the program that is no longer there. That is U.S. 377 or Fort Worth Drive from 1°35 south. We have been told by the District and the Resident Offices to not become discouraged but continue to work for that project. I think in coming years we may be able to get that reinstated. Why we would be coming to the Committee would be for additional recommendations for funding these new projects. We believe there is enough money loft in the approved bonds for the highway projects in the original 186 issue to cover these costs. We have had preliminary meetings with the Highway Department, and I have attached for you the section of the new funding program that deals with the new congestion mitigation/air quality (CEMAC) money. I will be happy to try and answer any questions you might have about TLL 7 AU0ndaN0, Agonda item_ <15 r_ '91 Committee November 10, 1992 Page 3 these projects and the convenience sources for the rest of our highway projects We look forward to seeing you Thursday evening. Hopefully, we can eveningugh T this not ruin all of your Ric Svehla Deputy City Manager 1 RSibw AMM001E6 Attachments Gsta..tiY . Y \ d Apida No. lsanl~ Agenda C/TY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MGKINNLY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 _ _ MEMORANDUM DATEt November 21 1992 Toy Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering 6 Transp FROMi Roger McDaniel, Supervisor of Engineering Teohs SUBJ2CT1 Sidewalk Repair I recommend the following sidewalks be repaired. The targeted areas and Zunntities Arai 10 Schmitz Frame to Bell 533,33 SY 0 18.00 $90600.00 Barricades S 20 -M Total $9,800.00 2. ~4Bg1C~.9.L Amarrillo to Alice rulto Congress to Egan 252 BY 1 18.00 $4,636.00 Barricades S " Total $4,736.00 3. ,gynnvdale 9unvalley to Kings now 202.22 BY 1 18.00 = $3,640,00 Barricades S 200.00 Total $3,840.00 4. Hickory Welch to Carroll 469433 SY A 18.00 $8,447.94 Barricades Total $8,647.94 5. Thomm Bellmeade to Emery 133.33 SY 1 18.00 $2,399.94 Barricades ".44.-qQ Total $2,599.94 The grand total for these five locations is $290623.88. The above prices do not include saw auto or removal. plou need fu her information, please advise, cDan e 112200107 8171666.8200 D/f W METRO 434.2529 I S TMUT" ..CITY -COUNCIL - - - ,t - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -TITT i _ °°on o ~oooooo° NoOOOo It d ev . r O~OOOO~~O0 N ~p°ooo~ 4fl OG =H X TM_ I I Agenda Nb. Agendelteni IItte ._s CITY COUNCIL REPQRT_FO_RMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Licensing the Martin Luther King, Jr, Recreation Center's After School Program DATE: December 3, 1992 F,COtPIFMD_ATION: The Parks and Recreation Department recommends licensing the Program Martin Luther King, Jr, Recreation Center's Kid Services. After Schhooo.li ens 9 by the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory will allow at M,L K, in checks addition to licensing the programs M,L,K 'sf School Kid Connection will again be managed by the Children's Programs Nupervisor as a tenth After School Action Site, SU 4;• !A$y_: It is proposed that the Kid Connection Progrivn at the M.L.K. Recreation Center become a licensed day care facility and operate as an After School. Action Site under the management of the Children's Programs Supervisor. The application for a license with the Texas Department of Protective Regulatory services has been submitted and is currently under .review, licensed site, the program will operate under the minimum guidelines of day care licensing restrictions, which allow for completing criminal history checks on the staff leaders of the program. children fro in eracting twith other children licensing thescenterowho are not in the program, in addition, staff will assist participants' parents in completing forms that are mandatory for the licensed ~progrr ~ ,tha is a ticipatt onhat he license will be approved in February, after School program will begin to operate as a licensed After School Action Site in March, 1993, gAC OOUND: The Kid Coiuiection Program began operating under the supervision of not allownfor tile Afterh Schootl Action Sii.te~Pr Program, during Licensing 1990-91 x31 year children in a licensed day care to mix with children who wers not in the program. This isolated the participants in day care from children participatinoni in other activities taking place In the center.. Consequently, par the program declined, TheBlock G ant {C HG), and s hthelday care license was not the Community Development am, under renewed. The program has operated as anon-licensed after school prose the management of the MIL.KI Recreation Center, since the 1991- 9 scho ri in year the program Increased aand CDBG fuiaing for the program was licensing, ed. 1992, concerns were raised regarding At a City Council Work Session in October, p after te risk factrs involved in not having rogram staf f at the M. L. K. Kid Connection , criminal as was history being done checks cthheelothero the school programs, While Kid Connection is not a licensed program, each of the nine Aftor School Action Sites are license, A desirable attribute of a licensed ApenlaNn..._ la d' _ - Apendallom,_ LICENSING Page 2 program is the ability to require a criminal background check on the leaders of that licensed program. Concerns that were raised in the Council Work Session have been addressed by recommending that the Kid Connection Program once again become a licensed day care program, operating under the management of the Children's Programs Supervisor as the tenth After School. Action Site. This will allow for criminal history checks to be conducted on the After School program staff at the M.L.K. site. PRO GRAMMpARTMEN'!/MUPS AFFECTED, The Children's Programs area will be impacted with the addition of this tenth After School Action Site, located at the M.L.K. Recreation Center. Administrative responsibilities will be greatly increased due to the reporting required by the Community Development Block Grant which would continue to fund the program at the M.L.K. Recreation Center. FI AL ?MPACT: The Kid Connection Program is currently funded by a Community Development Block Grant and will continue to be funded through CDBG as a licensed program. Additional expenditures required for licensing fees will be absorbed by the current Recreation to allow or he addition oFund ecrebudget. A ation Leader e to amendment address the expanding program supervision issues. Upon approval from the City Council, day care licensing with the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services or the current M.L.K. Kid Connection Program will be implemented in March, 1993. RESPECT LY SUBMITTED: Llo Harrell City Manager Prepared by: Rich DNu as Director of Parks and Recreation YcyApp byect)r, e Executive D un cipal Serv ces and Economic Development 1 Agonda No. Apentlaltom___ mle 3 REPORT ON THE LICENSING OF T]HE MARTIN I.UTfiER -KING, JR. RECREATION CENTER'S KID CONNECT IQN PROGiRAM The Parks and Recreation Department has determined that in order to offer consistency in after school programs throughout the City, Martin Luther King, Jr. Recreation Center's Kid Connection Program will be placed under the management of the Children's Programs Supervisor and operate as an After School Action Site. As an After School Action Site Program, this location will be licensed by the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services as a day care provider. The site will follow the same monthly program activity calendar as other Action Sites and go on monthly field trips. A>> with other Action Sites, this location will also complete monthly activity lesson plans specifically for the children at this site. This allows for the children to have input into the planning of r' the activities in which they partake, The process for licensing the M.L.K. site has been initiated and the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services has three months in which to approve the appli.eatiyn. The following documents have been submitted to the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services; Day Cara Licensing Application; Governing Body/Director Designation; Personal History Statement - Director; and the Licensing Fee Schedule. A request for criminal history checks will be submitted for the staff who are assigned to this location at the time the program moves under the management of the Children's Programs Supervisor, Once the licensing application has been reviewed by the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services, a meeting will be scheduled to discuss a waiver to the licensing restrictions. The licensing restriction, which will be requested to be waived, states that children in a licensed day care cannot mix with children who are not in licensed care. It is felt that We restricts the program offered at the M.L.K. Jr. Recreation Center due to the isolation the participants in the program must maintain from children participating in other activities taking place in the center. once this restriction is waived, the Action Site Program will have access to space within the facility which other center participants are also utilizing. Another licensing requirement, which has discouraged participation in the past, is to maintain completed information forms and emergency contacts on file for each participant. It is believed that there is now a greater understanding about the need to require such information, and more of a willingness by the parents to complete these forma. Staff will assist parents in completing the forms for the newly licensed after school. program. The license waiver and staff assistance in form completion should allow the M.L.K, Action Site to continue to successfully operate as it has in the past, The Community Development Block Grant will continue to fund the M,L.K. After school program for the remainder of the 1992-93 school year. Management of the grant funds will be supervised by the Children's Programs Supervisor once the licensing has been granted and the program supervision transferred. Barbara Ross, Community Development Administrator, has stated that attendance must be maintained at the current levels in order to continue funding for this program next year., Agenda Item...._ Nte ~a LICENSING OF THE MARTIN LUTHER KING, 3R• RECREATION CENTER'S KID CONNECTION PROGRAM Page 2 It is anticipated that the licensing process will be completed in FebruarY, 1993. Once the day care license for the M.L.K. site has been approved, staff will be trained on licensing and After School Action Site procedures. The program should begin operating as a licensed After School Action Site in March, 1993. it I December 3, 1992 / r T T, T: CITY COUNCIL ll~ -TT-11- I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ °ooaa ~a `D~pO o~ ae Op _ c~~~; ro pp G ea oar' : ~ . op~ioaor~aaacoo°°°°~ I IX. T h CITY COUNCIL REPORT F'OE2MAT AcediNo. ltom_.._ Agenda T0, Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM; Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: A opos d Enr r in Parks and Recreation Department's ter School Programs DATE: December 3, 1992 RwCOMMP W 10 The Parka and Recreation Department recommends supplementing the After School Programs with the addition of an enrichment program for participants. SUMMARY; The parks and Recreation Department has investigated the concern,; expressed by City council during tha work session of the October 20th After council meeting. The Department has also completed a second survey school Program participants to reassess parental desire for addiricq an enrichment program to the current after school programs. A GE (gyp; On 'Tuesday, Octobor 20, the parks and Recreation Department brought forth to City Council a proposal for the addition of an enrichment program to each of the ni Jr. Re,,reati nn Centers Kid Connecti n program. Council the expressed concerns as I follows; 1) Is the use of volunteers at Kid Conection and, paid staff at the After School Action Sites creating an inequity in service delivery between the two programs? The Parks and Recreation Department's After School Actin Site program is a fee-based program, while children at the Martin Luther King, ing, the JJr,Re ae fr~ Center's Kid Connection program are able to par of charge due to the funding being provided by the Community Development Block Grant. Departmental staff had originally recommended the use of to lmaintain Kid Connection as a feet program for the participants, in order program -at the M.L,K, Center Contact was initiated with the Administrator of the Community Development Block Grant to investigate the possibility of monies being available to fund staff for the enrichment program at M.L.K. The purpose was to enable the and maintains a participants Administ a or confirmedathat ibis fat, the M,L,. ree offers gK Thee CDHG receive possible to expand the grant that currently finds the Kid Connection program, allowing the Department to hire staff to conduct the enrichment program at M.L.K. nded Act s receive 2) lWoul eadedrshep hhoourss peer tparticippant ass thoseesites with fewer equivparticipantsalent ? of Maintainin articipant ratio Sites thatgis consistent with the leader/par,'ticipan ded tin at smallerAsites Sites has been addressed by restructuring the program rotation schedule. The enrichment program will be n ~halfet~hoone urs~at athahemedium smallersitessites {5052 participants), one and o I AaendaNo..., Agendalieni The°; o ipants), and two hours at the largest site (70 particzpastaff, one partic cipants, A ti staff ratio during enrichment activities every eighteen (18) par specialist and one on-site leader, for child will attend each of the five enrichment activities for 30 minutes each visit, repeated every two weeks, for a total of five enrichment activity hourb per month, 3) Are the majority of the parents willirAJ to pay an additional fee for an enr. ictment program? A follow-up survey Confirmed that parents would like an enrichment program tiona nthly fee at thew reaction sponses, 108 (or 78%) t addiwou dllikeRto ha a the program. 138 re L~ Of those 108 who want the program, 66 (or 61%) would like to seenti't implemented this fiscal year, Also noted in the survey was the Depar fee plan to increase etotallinc easelto $10 per$mo th for ecal achyparticipant. bringing next year's rease Even with the prospect parents were willing o pr month ay the£ext a rfee tothaveean year, participants' ' pa enrichment program implemented. p%WRAM/DE PARTMSITL9RQU'S !FpE~D: The Children's programs areAdditianal adminis rative d ties wil am. be placed upon significantly impacted by suthe pervision addition of licensing, staffing, will be rvisor of Children's Programs Because of the increased de mands the current sups program, successful 3'mplementation of this program of the enrichment approval of a Recreation header position, which is being contingent upon the e pPsubmitted as a separate request to Council, the program at the sIppALIt i the additional enrichmen $ program, monthly whfee ilei r suppl M L,K Center y costs for will be reimbursed through community Development Block Brant funds, Also es in the survey that was distributed to participants' parents was the Department' plan to increase the rerjular monthly fee by $5 for fiscal year 1993-94, bringing next year's total increase to $10 per month for each participant. Upon approval of the City Council, the Parks and Recreation Department will Enrichment program in March, 1993, implement the R E LY SUBM TTED: CY T,lo d V. xarreIll Cit" Manager Prepared by,. ~ Rich Dlugas, Dirk io-t-of Parks and Recreation Approv Y' ' Live Director, Municipal Services 12/1/92 Betty ,cKe , ants Economic Dev opment s A9entla No Ageridaltew_a2ss `of ,1 pn AFTER SCHOOL ENRICHMENT PROGRAM; MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS From city council meeting on October 20, 1992 1} Has the original enrichment proposal from the Parks and Recreation Department, recommending the use of volunteers at Kid Connection and paid staff at the After School Action Sites, created an inequity in service delivery between the two programs? The Parks and Recreation Department's After School Action Site program is a feo-based program, which assesses a monthly program charge to participants, In proposing the addition of an enrichment I' program, a projected $5 per month fee increase is also necessary to offset the costs of staff and supplies for the program, Currently, the Martin Luther King, Jr, Recreation Center's Kid Connection program is not fee-based and children are able to participate in the program free of charge due to funding by the Community Development Block Grant, Departmental staff had originally relommended the use of volunteers to implement an enrichment program at the M,L,K, Center in order to maintain Kid Connection as a free program for the participants. Contact was initiated with the Administrator of the Community Development Block Grant to investigate the possibility of monies being available to fund staff for the enrichment program at M.L.K. The purpose was to enable the participants at the M.L.K. site to receive the same service while ensuring that the program maintained its f: ee status, The CDBG Administrator confirmed that it is possible to expand the grant that currently funds the Kid Connection program at M.L.K. without the need for a formal amendment during fiscal year 1992-93. This will allow the Department to hire staff to conduct the enrichment program for the participants at M.L,K,, thus providing for the same service delivery without having to assess a fee to the parents for the program, In future years, it will be necessary to include the enrichment program at the M.L.K. site in the funding proposal for the community Development Block Grant program, (For budget detail, see Attachment A,) 'l} In offering an enrichment program at the expanded After School Action Sites, is a greater number of leadership hours required to maintain an equitable leader/participant ratio at those expanded sites? ~O 11 ~+gendaNd.....~a ~D~~ Agenda 1(e%_ Y.Z)__. AFTER SCHOOL ENRICHMENT PROGRAM, MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS Page 2 Maintaining a leader/participant ratio at the expanded After School j Action Sites that is consistent with the leader/participant ratio at smaller sites has been addressed by restructuring the program rotation schedule. The staff ratio during enrichment activities will be two (2) staff, one specialist and one on-site leader, for every eighteen (18) participants. Program hours will be equitably distributed among the expanded and the smaller sites. Enrichment activities will be offered according to the following time allotments; r 1. Small sites (34 to 35 participants) will receive onc hour of tho enrichment program par visit. Participants will be divided into two groups, and each child will be involved in an enrichment activity with two leaders for 30 minutes. II. Medium sites (51 to 52 participants) will receive one and one-half hours of the enrichment program per visit. Participants will be divided into three groups, and, again, each child will be involved in an enrichment activity with two leaders for 30 minutes. III. The largest site (70 participants) will receive two hours of the enrichment program per visit. Participants will be divided into four groups so that each child will also be involved in an enrichment activity with two leaders for 30 minutes. A child will attend each of the five enrichment activities for 30 minutes each visit, repeated every two weeks, for a total of five enrichment activity hours per month. The distribution outlined above ensures that a child will receive an equal number of programmed enrichment hours at whatever site the child participates. The enrichment program will include special activities on a bi-weekly basis at each site in the following areas; Environmental Awareness - nature activities; Arts - performing and visual; Movement/Coordination - tumbling, dance, and sports; Tutoring - math; and Tutoring - reading. (See Attachment B.) 3) Are the majority of the parents willing to pay an additional fee for an enrichment program? A follow-up survey, conducted November 18th-20th, confirmed that ` parents would like to have an enrichment program at their action site implemented for an additional $5 monthly fee. Of the 138 responses, 108 (or 78%) stated that they would like to have the program, of those 108 who want the program, 66 (or 618) would like to see it implemented this fiscal year. (See Attachment C.) Also noted in the survey was the Department's plan to increase the regular monthly fee by $5 for fiscal year 1993-94, bringing next Age ndaNo Agendaitem.~`~ ` ate /a `z AFTER SCHOOL ENRICHMENT PROGRAM; MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS~ Page 3 year's total increase to $10 per month for each participant, Even with the prospect of a total of $10 per month fee increase for next year, participants' parents were willing to pay the extra fee to have an enrichment program implemented, i e \ ~ T pr AttacJumt A PROPOSED ENRI M pRO(7RAH i UDG = AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM Agenda 10 Locations Agenda I ts~te- ~'Z g81+ NUB ~ X A $5.00 X 350 participants X 9 months $15,750.00 5-t-a0L00 6XP6KDITUR H rso~n„gl 5 staff X 431,5 hra X $5.24 per hr $11,305.30 FICA/Worker's Compensation -1 43 Total Personnel: $120434.73 supplies $1.55 supplies X 400 participants X 9 months $ 51580.00 BxvendiU- re R q i tnbareaMg. pt a Community Development Block Grant ($2,498.61) T T L P ITUalsa-_ 1515J,6 ~1I &LA C$ 88 PROPOSED AFTER SCHOOL attach Qent B ENRICHMENT CLASS SCHEDULE . G'12bi1P<'II G'!bC(1'~+ IIT: S McNAIR JJODM- BORMAN GBE GINNINGS M.L:KING,. < RAXxOR , HQUSTON, W,ILSO41,; IQE~K 1, HONDA. Tutoring Movement Tutoring Unviron- Arts/^ (R) (M) mental Crafts TUESDAY : - Tutoring Movement Tutoring Environ- Arts/ (R) _ (M) mental Crafts HE.9OAY Arts/ Tutoring Movement Tutoring Environ- Crafts _ (R) (N) mental TI~URSDAT Arts/ Tutoring Movement Tutoring Envxron- _ Crafts (R) (M) mental FRIDAY Environ- Arts/ Tutoring Movement Tutoring mental Crafts (R) (M) ►~4NDAX Environ- Arts/ Tutoring Movement Tutoring mental Crafts (R) (M) TUESDAY Tutoring Environ- Arts/ Tutoring Movement 1 (M) mental Crafts _ (R) I Tutoring Environ- Arts/ Tutor Vement _ (M) mental Crafts (R) TRURSDAY Movement Tutoring Environ- Arts/ Tutoring (M) _ mental. Crafts (R) V ~ ~ItIDAY Movement Tutoring Environ- Arts orinq (M) mental Craft GROUP s I, S ~ R site size ieF34-35 ) pErt C tB. GROUP II: Site size is 50-57. Pan Program s or one hOur,-w up o part c pants per m~.nutes, GROUP III; Site size is 50 participants. Program is for one and one-half hours, with up to IS participants per notes. 70 participants, Program is for two hours, with up to 18 participants per 30 minutes, ,1.~xJ h A~tactvreri~_C ApndaNo RISULPS Agendaltero_ld1-- , ye~ZJ A.S.A.S. MVIC44M PROGRAM [YIte1~.` y Parents' Survey 0 nt The After School Action Site Program is The enrichment hen considering planpr Program in the program into its curriculum beginning in macho 1993. T would include special activities on a bi-weekly basis at each citerforming following areas: Environmental Awareness - nattu ce activities; Arts - Tutoring - math; and visual; Ho child -tumbling, d, and sports; and Tutoring - reading. Each child touweeks, t for a h total of five a ichment activities for 30 minutes, once every tivities ld be e(;re hours per month' pThe staff ratio during articipants, Spec alty s affW ould Cbe hired nuthese ,io more than. 2staff/18 pa enrichment areas in order to provide an enhanced program. would participate ogram All children enrolled in the In After SCh00l Action Site order to cover the additional costs of supplies in the enrichment program. 5,00. Therefore the and personnel, the monthly fee would be increased bX $ would be: monthly fees for the remaining months of the j9-92--N-9-44-=L1-Ye-U- March April Y. $55 $65 $65 Fee schedule with Enrichment Program Fee Schedule without. Enrichment Program $50 $60 $60 Whether or not the sarichment program is implemented, the monthly fee for the 1993-94 school year will increase by $5.00 each month due to the increased costs of supplies and personnel necessary to continue to operate thes program was i as cw:rently offered. The lee schedule for the 199394 Except Aunt Sgpt-MaY Degl-M-U Fee schedule with Enrichment Program $20 $70 $60 Fee schedule without Enrichment Program $20 $65 $55 Please take this into consideration when responding to this nsur into the After schnoL Action ou Site like to Progrhave an enrictanent program imp Would Y am for an additional $5,00 per month? l 108 __yea No 2) if yes, which school year would you like to see it implemented? _ 66 _ Remainder of 1992-93 school. year OCO~_ Start of 1993-94 school year 2_-- No Response November 20. Please return this form to the leaders at your site by Friday, If you have any questions, please contact Brenda Burton, children's Programs Supervisor, at 566-8125, 33/92 WIN r .F CITY COUNCIL vooo04o~aa C'po t hoo..:_._ Ilk Q` ~U. o- OO~~~ r o M t E ooO~pp Uouoooocoaao . T Age naa 110,2, fate __..~~u~) k. CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES /'tCdE, November 10, 1992 i1 The Council convened into the work Session at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Roam. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins; Council Members Brock, Chew, Perry, Smith and Miller. ABSENT: None 1. The Council was to have convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters (considered action in Coats v. City of Denton), real estate, and personnel/board appointments but decided that such was not needed, 2. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding amendments to the sign ordinance and gave staff direction. Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, reviewed the document presented to Council for back-up material. The document was divided into sections detailing a summary of issues and recommendations; sign ordinance chronology; face changing; abandoned sign and supporting structures; calculating effective area, monument signs and special sign district; banners on buildings/wind devices; banners over streets; temporary and stake signs; signs on IH-35; separation of signs on one premise; sign standards comparison chart; enforcement; current ordinance with proposed amendments; Planning and Zoning minutes; and chamber of Commerce recommendations and questionnaire. He outlined the Planning and Zoning issues and recommendations which were listed in Attachment 1 of the agenda back-up. Relative sign ordinance dates included June 8, 1982 when Council discussed portable signs and authorized the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider a comprehensive review of the sign ordinance. January 15, 1985 the Council considered an ordinance and a process of "three years of research and development". Council considered an ordinance regarding signs on May 5, 1985 and were made aware of possible State legislation which would disallow "amortization" of signs on mow... June 1, 1985. In October 1987, the Beautification Task Force proposed a new sign ordinance. A new sign ordinance was adopted on February 7, 1989 and on October 3, 1989, the Council requested a review of setback standards and a comprehensive review of the 1989 ordinance began. A new vign ordinance was adopted on April 2, 1991. At the August 6, 1991, Council meeting council heard a citizen complaint about "changing face" of Abby Floor sign. Council asked for a Planning and Zoning report on the issue. On November 5, 1991, Council amended the sign ordinance to allow signs to be used until 1996 if they were altered, and clarified variance criteria. Council asked for sign ordinance amendments to be considered on May 5, 1992. Robbins presented a slide presentation regarding sign regulations and the changes a sign ordinance made in Lubbock, Tx. ~rt ~t i ~I Age ods Ni). _._E12 Agootlal~om City of Denton City Council. Minutes November 10, 1992 Page 2 one of the areas under consideration was face changing, The current i ordinance did not allow for a change of face without making the sign conforming. The proposed ordinance would allow a face change without making the sign conforming. A permit would be required but would not require a totally new sign. I City Manager Harrell stated that there might be a point where changes would be allowed on multiple tenant ssigns mbut not on free standing signs. Robbins stated that that was another alternative suggested to the Planning and Zoning commission. Council Member Smith asked what was the 1996 regulation. Robbins replied that a temporary use permit would allow a change in the sign but would require the sign to be in compliance by January It 1996. If the sign was not conforming by that date, the City could take the sign down. Another proposed change was with temporary signs in which the current sign ordinance indicated that the sign had to be hammered into the ground, The proposed change would not require the sign to be hammered into the ground but could be attached to an existing sign. Council Member Perry asked that if the Council accepted the Planning and Zoning recommendation regarding face changing, what would happen to a vacant or incorrect sign in a multiple tenant sign. Robbins replied that a permit would be required to make a change in the face. A permit could be issued if the sign did not become any more non-conforming than it was currently. Council Member Smith stated that if the Council accepted the proposed changes to the face changing requirements, anyone with a new sign would still have to meet the requirements of the ordinance. Robbins replied correct. council Member Miller asked if a multi-tenant sign with an empty slot could be required to put some type of blank face in the slot so that the sign was properly maintained. If that were not done, then the sign would not be a legal sign. He felt that multiple signs should be required to maintain the blank portions of the sign. 1 ,mr,daNo, ~ µJa.LYiMAI~/W City of Denton City Council Minutes /n November 10, 1992 Page 3 Mayor Castleberry asked if the sign were lowered two feet, would it have to become conforming. Robbins stated that under the current ordinance, it would have to become conforming but under the proposed ordinance it would not have to become conforming, Robbins continued with abandoned signs and abandoned supporting structures. Under the current ordinance abandoned signs and abandoned supporting structures were to already have been taken down. Under the proposed ordinance the sign would have to be used or it would be taken down. Using it could include putting in a blank face with no advertising on it to be in compliance. This would have to be done within 90 days from the effective date of ordinance. Council Member Miller asked how long the provision had been in effect regarding abandoned signs. Robbins replied the sign ordinance had been amended in 1991 with the effective date of June, 1992 which had not been enforced. Council Member Miller asked why it had not been enforced. City Manager Harrell stated that once staff proceeded with the take-down provision, there would be a lot of public response. Staff decided to wait until Council had made a final decision regarding its position on abandoned signs and abandoned supporting structures before beginning take-downs. Council Member Miller stated that the proposed changes would give the sign owner an option to either to make the sign conforming or the sign would be removed. If due process was completed and the sign removed, a lien could be placed on the property for the cost of taking the sign down. He asked if a sign company could be approached to remove the signs for the cost of the materials of the sign. Robbins replied that staff was currently in the process of gathering such information. He continued with the proposed recommendations for determining effective area. There were three separate reconunendations from the Planning and Zoning Commission. one recommendation was to change the way the effective area calculation was measured to allow monument signs, and one was to decrease the qualifications for a special sign district. A proposed change by the Chamber was to deal with effective area calculation only on that portion of the sign which carried the message. The current regulation was to include the entire oign rand not just the area with the message. The Planning and Zonina Commission decided that the entire sign was needed to be calculated. With monument ~1 l ACenda No. Agenda fete .~'_2... city of Denton City Council Minutes November 10, 1992 Page 4 signs, the effective area calculation would not be changed, If the monument sign were on a pedestal, it would not be counted in the effective area. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins stated that some monument signs could be viewed from two sides but did not have messages on two sides. How would that type of monument sign be measured, Robbins replied that if the sign had only one face, that side would be measured and not both sides. Robbins presented illustrations of signs and how effective area would be measured. Special sign districts were also considered and the proposal would be to determine the sign in its surrounding and determine If it met the appropriate criteria. This might be an area of compromise for signs. Banners on buildings, as recommended by the Chamber of Commerce, would not be required to obtain a permit. The Planning and Zoning Commission did not agree with that recommendation. It proposed to allow a banner for 30 days and have a 30 day waiting period between signs on a particular building. Currently the ordinance allowed 30 days for each permit and three permits per year. The proposal would be to permit a banner on a building for 30 days and wait for 30 days for an additional permit, City Manager Harrell stated that the background to that issue was i to allow a business to have a temporary advertising sign with a banner. Currently there was the potential for abuse of the system. Robbins stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission did not have a recommendation regarding banners over streets. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins stated that she hoped that the Council would disallow banners across the streets, { Robbins stated that the proposed changes for temporary signs/stake signs would eliminate the requirement that the sign be hammered into the ground. The height standard of signs along IH35 was proposed to be increased. There was no recommendation proposed from the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding that issue. Staff had recommended to not change the standard. Council Member Brock felt that the Planning and Zoning Commission did not take a stand on some issues and were, in effect, recommending against those changes. She indicated that Council might ask the Planning and Zoning Commission to deal with some of those issues and present a recommendation to Council. Robbins indicated that on sign separation, the staff recommendation was to reduce the sign separation to 601. NondaNn I AgendaItem_ 5- ' City of Denton City council minutes November 10, 1992 Page 5 amount rational for reducing the Council Member Smith asked for separation amount to such a y Robbins replied that a survey of area cities indicated 50' was the standard rather than 4001. council Member Miller at c about had not been dealt flags could be flownt The or on The ordinance was very pecifi the poles. He suggested a provision to allow flags from another ordinance shouldcurallr,entowpfroroviision al p ab and felt that the country. The Ir Robbins replied that the Planning and zoning commission had received a report on that issue but had made no recommendion as the original proposal had been withdrawn. It could be placed on the agenda for Council discussion. a date rev stin city Manager Harrell indicated that wasublic hearing regarding from Council as to when the p blicu hearing, at the same meeting or this issue. Following through the issues to a subsequent work session, Council could go give general direction on how to have an ordinance drafted. Robbins stated that the notice of public hearing had to be published 14 days before the scheduled Council meeting. Ans felt a h Mayor Pro Tem H ublic hearing andthen uformulate Council decisions citizens at a p on the ordinance. Mayor Castleberry suggested holding the public hearing at the December 8th meeting. Consensus of the council was to hold the public hearing £orn Councthe of December with a work session in early January discussion. 3. The council received areport staff di held ondiscussion regarding the platting process and gave Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning and Development, stated that State law indicated that if a plat conformed with Ple general regulations of a municipality, it had to beolip making or not a approval was an administrative act and w order to streamline the a legislative act. Accordingly, process, it had been recommended that Council need not consider plats. Another issue Council of alder areasinwthe dCity. it t was t older areas and Agenda Into city of Denton City Council minutes lO 4y November 100 1992 Page 6 recommended that unplatted land which was subdivided before Denton adopted subdivision regulations, and upon which a single family house would be built on an existing street, not be required to be platted. Mayor Pro Tem. Hopkins stated that when citizens received notice of a plat and notification of a council meeting and then learned that the Council did not have the right to deny the plat, it was very confusing as to why the Council was considering the plat in the first place. She felt that platting did not need to be done in the older sections of the City as the area had been surveyed many times before. Council Member Perry asked what would be allowed on such a lot in an older section of the city. Robbins replied that that would be a zoning issue and would not be addressed with this regulation. Council Member Chew asked if the council would be involved with any of the replat process. I Robbins replied that the Council would not be involved. Council Member Chew asked how would it be handled. Robbins replied that the infrastructure would already be in place and may be changing lot lines. Council would not be reviewing plats or variances. The proposal was that the Planning and zoning Commission would deal with variances. Council held a discussion regarding how much involvement it would have in dealing with the platting process and with variances. 4. The council received a report and held a discussion regarding Laylor fund allocations. John McGrane, Executive Director for Finance, stated that the purpose of this report was to provide information to Council regarding the Laylor funds. The hotel/motel occupancy tax was 7% for sleeping rooms which cast more than $2 and were rented for less than 30 days. The City basically acted as a pass through agency and contracted with third parties to deal with those funds. The definition of the law was to promote tourism and the convention and hotel industry and was limited to convention centers, advertising, promotional programs, encouragement and promotion of the arts and historical restoration and preservation. The law did not allow day- to-day operational expenses not incurred directly in the promotion 1 NjundANo..__. ""do ltsm__~~' ~ CJty of Denton City Council Minutes November 10, 1992 Page 7 and travel. The North Texas State Fair received 95% of 1%, the Convention and Visitors Bureau received 95% of 3%, the Greater Denton Arts Council received 1%, the Denton County Historical Museum received 95% of 88/100ths of 1%, the Denton County Historical Foundation received 95% of 12/100ths of 1% and the civic center received $26,000. The Fair contract would expire in 1994, the Chamber contract would expire on August 30, 19940 the County contracts expired in 1995 as did the Arta Council. Council Member Chew felt that a long range goal was to look at ways to develop some type of convention center in Denton. McGrane replied that there were reserve funds which over the years would accumulate for perhaps a convention center or special projects which might arise. Council Member Brock asked when the Laylor legislation was passed which first made it possible to collect the tax. City Attorney Drayovitch stated that it was approximately 1977. City Manager Harrell stated that in 1986 the City was allocating 6% of the 7% allowed and in that year, the money was allocated to the Fair. 5. New Business There were no items of New Business which were suggested by Council Members for future agendas. City Manager Harrell reminded the Council of the joint School District luncheon set for Monday, November 16th at the DISD Administration Building. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:20 p.m. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR { CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS JENNIFER WALTERS CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ACCOOOCB CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES' /D NOVEMBER 16, 1992 The Council convened in a joint session with the Denton Independent School District Board of Trustees on Monday, November 16, 1992, at 12:00 noon at the Denton Independent School District Administration Building, 1307 N. Locust, Denton, Texas. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry, Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins, Council Members Chew, Smith, Perry, Brock, and Miller. ABSENT: None 1. The Council held a discussion regarding various issues relative to the City of Denton and the Denton Independent School District. The following items were discussed: 1. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, reported that Dr. Tim Sonnenberg, Susan McGuire, Bill Angelo and he had met regarding televising o` r. Council and School Board meetings and determined a number of issued which needed clarification. A report on the joint program was scheduled for presentation to the City Council and the School Board by mid December. Mr. Harrell stated that the city intended to maintain the spirit of cooperation in coordination of future bond issues. The city had completely exhausted bond money. In order to finance future CIP issues, the city needed another bond issue but promised to work closely with the DISD and its future bond efforts. Mr. Harrell reported that, the city was moving ahead with determining city space needs. The city was searching for an architect for the design on the Denton Municipal Complex and hoped to have a contract ready for Council award by the first quarter of 1993 with the anticipated move of city offices by the end of the year. Mr. Harrell reported that Jesus Nava, Assistant to the City Manager, had accepted a position as Assistant City Manager for the < . City of Laredo, 2. Dr. Tim Sonnenberg, Superintendent of Schools, stated that the DISD anticipated the report on the public access channel as a positive joint effort which was beneficial to both groups. Dr. Sonnenberg stated that the School District also wished to cooperate with the city in coordinating future bond issues. Dr. Sonnenberg reported that at the last Board meeting a list of improvements for the District totalling approximately $20 million was presented. The improvements included some changes to the new Rivera Elementary School, another elementary school to help meet pp~l 1 ~gonda,No. ~ Agon~ialiajn~-.--=--~• . City of Denton. City council minutes November 16, 1992 page 2 some additional renovations to t be , modifications to a number Of lass campus the state mandated cass leveler chnology Denton High school upgrade in te other facilities, and an ups ear Ma or Castleberry asked for a briefing on the possibility of y y round school, year round school hadilnot ot ted that the issue of y et into any Pilot Dr. Sonnenberg repor The Board decided not to 9 s financial constr died and gone away., ear because of on program during the urrent y the program was $ po colampuwas fear of year round When year round school was initiated, by campus basis. The biggest multiple tracking in an individual family proposals' Mayor Castleberry asked about future building prop the board scheduled review by projects was Dr. Sonnenberg reported ofh the n proposed building concerning the impact and future proposals re-evaluated based ated in five years, anticip urea and cost. on enrollment fig short synopsis of whwon the impact council g Member Jack in Austin tinlregardkto school finance and happening the Denton. two issues reviewed by choo Dr. Sonnenberg reported that the to address equitable diatriP~A8ent1Y£ s Denton legislature needed of the level of funding he level 00. funds and adequacy stood to lose approximately timetable for the -,w,..• Trustee, questioned the jean Schaake, School was city's Cip bond issue, to go there to the was ity Out looked funds c Mr, Harrell stated that since the city no money to do any major or projects and the voters fairly quickly, stated that at least a six month ro Tom, Jane Hopkins, Mayor since the process had not been started, timetable was needed asked if there was anything new on the Vicki Holt, School Trustee, he economic development front, reported that trIe outlet mall was The next open and phase the Mayor Castleberry in after the first of the year. City looked forward to an increase in sales ax. the mall was schedule e ~lebto Denton for the last thfour e firatkpaat employees by Peterbiit had brought P and required decisions on transferriny of December. I Agondaltem_ City of Denton City Council Minutes November 16, 1992 /J Page 3 With no further business, the meeting was adjou;:ned at 1:25 p.m. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BETTY WILLIAMS - DEPUTY CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON AMMOOIFC !I I I 4' CITY COUNCIL N I 1 oov°°Qd Of ID O,~ tir0~0 O o O p ~ Oq b c~ b p~ tg O 'NI ~ Agenda 40 ApeN81101 3 - obte..1 / ✓1 of DEWTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BULDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, T17XAS 76201 CITY - MEMORANDUM November 2, 1992 DNT Harrell, City Manager TO: Lloyd V ~ THROUGH: John F, McGrane, Executive Director of Finance Jon Fortune, Management Services Administrator FROM: SUBJECT: RECEIPT OF ESNECIALLY NOTABLE AWARD FROM GFOA I am pleased to inform you that the City's 1991-92 budget was recognized as being "An Especially Notable Communications recently frecognitioncwasiawarded then Device" by the Government Finance United States and Canada, This special addition to the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award receive last month. Each y budgets from federal, state and local year GFOA reviewschoo ddistricts, cities and counties agencies, including lan, an operations guide, and a deviceinancialfspand Canada to evaluate in 1984, cthrommunioughoutcation the Unit policy document, Since GFOA began reviewing . eight cities have ever received recognition as having an only 1992); Fort "Especially Notable communioang°n Beach,CeCalifornia i(i1es inrlu es Arizona (1968); Colorado (a ( Windsor, Connecticut , Colorado (1991) ; Kersey, 1889, 1); Hurst, Connecticut (1987, 1988, 1989) ; Dayton, Ohio Texas (1992), and Denton (1992)• et a model for received this honor will make Denton 's bug meet, Having I hope that in the future can other cities across the ndocuments that not special meet ition. continue to produce budget far exceed the standard established from this slease advise. If you would like additional information, p JFHCG,af AFF003FF 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 4342529 i . COUNCIL T T -}1. J-1- ;,l aQOi~a~ooo ~ 0 pOO~a ° P ° pp a r O~ : c' o c~ . ~oo~ooaeuo~aa~0°~~ -11~ IN 1 nq Q agenda No..,~ Apdaltern_ /'s 1 ORDINANCE 140. A14 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT TO SINGLE FAMILY SF-10(C] WITH CONDITION ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 32.045 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF COUNTRY CLUB ROAD APPROXIMATELY 920 FEET SOUTH OF HOBSON LANE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2, 000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Hammett & Nash has applied on behalf of Giovanni Giomi for a change in zoning for 32.045 acres of land from an Agricultural Zoning District to Single Family SF-10 zoning district classification and use designation; and WHEREAS, on November 11, 1992, the Planning and Zoning Commis- sion recommended approval of the requested change in zoning with a condition; and WHEREAS, the City council finds that Single Family SF-10(c] zoning will be in compliance with the Denton Development Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the zoning district classification and use designation of the 32.045 acres of land described in Exhibit A, attached to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference, is changed from Agricultural Zoning District to Single Family SF- 10(c] with a Condition zoning district classification and use designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTICN II. That in accordance with Ordinance No. 91-070, the property shall be subject to the following condition: Any and all lots abutting the Forestridge Subdivision Phase I or. Phase II, will bc, no less than 13,000 square feet in size. SECTION III. That the City's official zoning map is amended to show the change in zoning district classification. SECTION IV., That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $2,000. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. SECTT00V V. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the datj of its passage, and the city Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official i R AgentlaNe, _.....~.~....s~---~- Agenda llem --AO ~ newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ day of 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY I BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY.' PAGE 2 i F [:1I1TBI A ALL THAT BEING CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCH AQ@Ad@1rHln'_ ~S NUMBERS900ATED DENTONTHE T. J. AlARTIN SUR}vEY"LY-I• TRACT I AS DESC COUNTY COLVILLE /A RIBED IN ATEXAS, AND BEI ABSZgACr,,-- OF THE 0 H D A/K COL LED E TO F R O W I L L I Ly OF 3186 28 AGE 366 FEBRUARY 992 GIOVAN A8 S, TEXAS AND 0 REAL PROPE ' AND RECD NI GIOAQ 08 BEING MORE pARTICULARL1C,ORDS OF DDED BEGINNING AT ENTONNCQ~U'Er N jpOX PIN DESCRIBED AS POLL ;..,s F•M• ROAD 1830 (COUNTRY CLUB CORNER OF TACT IJ EAST IN TH AD) AT THE OF WAY O THENC ROAD) E THE NORT p ALONG AND SOUTH 89 nrEST DEGREES IRON P NEAR A FENCE A D S58 TANINUTES IN AT THE NORTH CE pp 32 SECONDS NORTHEAST 1293.10 FEET Tj THENCE .U SOUTH pp CORNER OF Ali DISTANCE OF DEGREES 1 p SAID TRACT 1; OF SA 400; O6 FEET TO M UTES ID TRACT AN 33 SECONDS WEB A _ THENCE PIN AT AN EL CCEVn~a ALONG ANDORTH 89 DEGREES IRON NEAR A F 57 MINUTES j9 + PIN EAST E A DISTANCE SECONDS EAST IN THE WESTTHE NORTHEAST CORNER1322.83 FEET IM An OUNDARY PAGE 56TR pL,~TPRE p SECTIN RDB OF ENTON NENASORECO DED P BLOC1~ P 330 THENCE COUNTY, TEXAS OLU!tE 11, ALONG THE UTH 00 DEGREES 35 J ONE A DISTANCE HO DARY INE MINUTES 28 SOUTHWEST 123.90 p OF FORaEST SECONDS SST CORNER pg CORNER OF FEET TO RIDGE, SEtO'I09 SAID LOT AN IRAN PIN AT THE LOT 34 33 AND AS RECORDED DENTpN COUTNy I TECH IOC7C OF PAP GE NORTHnST XAS NET , PAGE 12, PLA r SECTION TWO THENCE J T RECORDS OF SOUTH 00 DEGREES ALONG THE 07 WEST BOUNDARY MINUTES TWO A DISTANCE OF 212 FEET F FO 38 SECONDS QEST l SOUTHEAST CORNER RRESTRIDGE OF SAID TRACT I TO AN IRON PIN SECTION I J AT THg I A D 9TANT AL NG THE SOUTH B RIGHT OF WAY OF 6I702 g BOUNDARY LINE P.M. ,RO FSATHP ~CT TO AN IRON PIN EAST THENCE 1EET 830 J I ALONG Tgg NORTH 00 DEGREES 19 DISTANCF. EAST RIGHT OF MINUTES p1 DI TANCE F 735.95 FEET TO THE WA Y POINT F•M. RSECDS OAD 1 EAST IN ALL 32,045 INT 1830 A ACRES OF LAND OF BEGINNING AND Apanda Ilem_ mie PLAMING IND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT - Mayor and Members of the City Council Tot 12/08/42 Meeting Datei Case No's Z-92-023 _1- GENERAL INFORMATION N Hammett Nash Applioantt Street 223 W. Hi cko76201 Denton, TX Current owners Giovanni GiomiSte, 605 1444 Oaklawn75207 Dallas, TX frou~ the Family-10 Rezone a 32.045 acre tract Of land Requested Action: Agricultural istrict t the Sing District. the acre tract of land loa proximately 32,045 Club Road, I>p Location and Siaes east side of country 920' south of Hobson Bane. Surrounding Land Use and zonings Agricultural North - Planned Development 104 vacant), South _ Agricultural Fast - SF_16i Forrestridge West Agricultural Denton Development Plant Low Intensity Area. SPECIAL INFORMATION r Transportation, the standard of the subdivision ordinance For SF-10 zoning, will apply* lram_ Agenda (Case. Z-92-023) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued) o Sidewalks will be required on country Club Road as well as any interior streets. o Curb and gutter streets are required. o No drive approaches will be allowed on Country Club Road. Utilities: Water: The proposed subdivision Country Club connect to the six (6) inch water line on i Sewer: At the time of platting the following must be addressed: o tThe entire hat may be e pumped eto the vicinitya of f Coed station station presently inactive o The engineer needs to calculate capacity requirements for the entire development. o The proposed lift station needs to meet the Texas Water commission criteria. Fire: Approved fire hydrants will have to be installed in the development, spaced a maximum of 600 feet maapar in. on a minimum of. a six (6) inch public The minimum water capacity required is 750 gpm. Elsotriot Electric service is available to the property from an existing three phase electric circuit on Hobson Lane. Extension of City facilities on country Club Road would be underground. Drainaget Channel improvements will be required. After the improvements are completed, an "as built" flood study will be required to be submitted to the City Engineer. The City Engineer will forward the study to FEMA for official letter of (flood) map revision. 3 WOO i, to (Case Z ee 023) page Thr into the e tract aajeXtaken plthe g~ORY r r 11l•72 activItie complies with 8X art of a Zoning fully I of land is par 3.9B3 Na reZOninq and case Tht ton February The regpe~etlop%ent plan. si°r beard who Commis S me es on phis oft the Denton ing and olgbbors nd Of hypes e-VOloper policies 1992°f the n"mbbh$ 1 td Yationauntil the de On October 14$ecause ion zk° led Consl at Cit`1 Kall. 023. 1 inf commisgiOn eld hbors. wash e homeowtriese r opo ed t he the neiq orhood meeting rresttiedr aZ ) p5ed deed could meet a neig o ants were o e$ and eir prop no p1 th ber 199the part types ofassed out division` layout wl ' The mamain concern ghee delel~aYout Of treview of the the b omes and ao and a potol the Curred to the eastfeet in ed 000 lots square e size restr abe to 1r g'~ atlOrs h co nsider hassdthan 19 1°njnimum out to the req ed to be no n5ide e pointed fined by the cant afire easement he would reco et 8 detern+ p opo eKedalsoaa5r t°a 22 the home is normally e types °t eeCI from 1800 that the niZe of future lffdexplain~ntie se I neighbors haare e stYidg are and that iained thri market. neiqhbors F° ea er exp q cerns the s abutting intensitystaff furevelOpers hoardi ow I eowner other her vacant eY Y rwas i d be en ted bYdpoten would kese aye e residentihla riot beer buttthataevelopm rt in thi Staff, requeslots the ei vacant treast future cant eontattion that be no legs than thus ation ab as5pci ideration,ttincludi qs ax'- aridY zX would Cons reques e section oSion °°n ttheir After e reZOriinq restridg d honing Commi023 from the abutting care feeIt arming an ion of Z approval dwbYhstaff .00 13iNOV tuber cl bear ingeet rgPlpr coan r ca tuna d recommende 14)97 the -ns -1, heir bli, as r C)9; equest ed by the dition Ttt 'i A06ndr hla.._ Agondaltam ['ate __/a --F 9,L (Case Z-92-023) Page Three HISTORY The tract of land is part of a 111.72 acre tract annexed into the City on February 15, 1983. No zoning activities have taken place on this site. The requested rezoning fully complies with the policies of the Denton Development Plan. On October 14, 19921 the Planning and Zoning Commission heard case Z-92-023. Because of the number of neighbors at this meeting who requested information about the lot sizes and types of homes r proposed, the Commission tabled consideration until the developer could meet with the neighbors. On November 5, 1992, a neighborhood meeting was held at city Hall. The majority of the participants were Forrestridge homeowners, Their main concerns were types of homes and the sizes of these homes and lots. The developer passed out their proposed deed restrictions and a possible layout of the subdivision. As no plat has been submitted to the City, no review of the layout with regards to regulations has occurred. The applicant agreed to consider that any lots to the east of the proposed drainage easoment: be no less than 13,000 square feet in size. He also agreed that he would reconsider minimum house size from 1800 square feet to 2200 square feet. He pointed out to the neighbors that the size of the home is normally determined by the market. Other concerns the neighbors had were future land use types on other vacant parcels abutting Forrestridge. Staff explained that their property was in a low intensity area and that low intense residential uses would be encouraged. Staff further explained that the city had not been contacted by potential developers regarding these vacant tracts, but that the city would keep the homeowner association abreast of future development in this area. After consideration, the applicant contacted City Staff, requesting the rezoning request including a condition that any and all lots abutting Forrestridge Sections I and II would be no less than 13,000 square feet. On November 11, 19920 the Planning and zoning commission continued their public hearing and consideration of 7,-92-023 from their October 14, 1992 meeting and recommended approval with the condition as requested by the applicant and recommended by staff Agenda No train (Case Z-92-023) Page Four ANALYSIS This property is located in a low intensity area.iAcnordinforo tthe he Denton Development Plan, these areas are pr protection and preservation of residential, neighborhoods. Currently this tract Of land has an intns e allocation combined with 1,922.7 trips (60 x 32.045). Single single family-13 lot sizes, has an intensity allocation of 965 trips (30 x 32.045) thus reducing the intensity allecation by one- half. stor section of this report, the requested of the Denton Development As stated in the Y rezoning fully complies with all policies Plan regarding Low Intensity Areas. Emphasis is placed of the intensity allocation policy when I what area of the c evaluating a zoning chanaget eg and ese, oallocation would beredced_ request lies. In this p by one-half. Another policy pertains to housing diversification. "it is the policy of this plan that housing diversity be strongly encouraged in Denton as a whole. The policy of housing diversity and is closely related to housing size, acre densi y(0 ),cost. ouless diversity is defined in units per as low - medium (6- than 12) and high (12 and over)." The Plan goes on to state: of sure that Diversified housing patterns should be well planned to all neighborhood integrity is maintained. Examp s planning policies are: 1. No type of housing be overly concentrated in one area. 2. Good site design transition between housing types and density, greenbelts, housing density gradation and architectural design. * 3. Transo chrough lower sdenshtysareas. an so that higher 4. Provide for different etween neighborhoods and activity modes or transportat integrated within an T Agenda Itom _ 5~~~ (Case Z-92-023) Etile Page Five Y 5. Create codes and ordinances to promote and encourage the quality of smaller size housing. * At the southwest corner of Country Club Road and Hobson Lane there lies a Planned Development District with uses approved for: a.) General Retail. b.) 220 multi-family dwelling units. c<) 34 zero-lot line homes. We consider this to be a high intensity land use. The proposal of 32 acres being zoned for single family residential with 10,000 square foot minimum lot size is considered a reasonable land use transition to the single tamily-16 lots in Forestridge. Policy #3 above makes reference to transportation design so that higher density housing can be served without flowing through lower density areas. The design of the proposed subdivision does not, nor can it ve Country ClubaRoadcandsththrough Forestridge. e entrance between the two subdivisions are more than one-half mile apart. The applicant has stated that the homes he is anticipating being built in this area will be in the $150,000 Research has indicated that existing homes in Forestridge haveabeen selling in the $140,000 - $225,000 range and new homes are being built between $70.00 sf, to $90,00 sf, As in all, zoning cases we look mainly to land use compatibility. The Plan does go into detail about emphasis being given to the development of diversified housing in all which also suggests that one housin t ectors of the city, concentrated in any one section of the city, ype should not be The Planning and Zoning Commission believed that by placing the ' condition on this tract of land that "any and all lots abutting the Forestridge subdivision, sections I and II will be no less than 13,000 rf$', was a valid compromise in the scheme of land use issues. Although there was extensive discussion on size of homes to be built, this was not an issue the Planning and Zoning Commission mada a recommendation on, as this is normally handled via deed restrictions or covenants, authored by the developer, and filed with the County. f TAgenda No, Agendaltem i'me (Case Z-92-07,3) Page Six ~J RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-92-023 (6-1), with the following condition: Any and all lots abutting the Forrestridge Subdivision, Phase I or Phase TT, will be no less than 13,000 square feet in size. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition 2 Approve petition with additional conditions 3, Deny petition 4. Delay consideration ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map. 2. Draft minutes. I .:ter ' ATTACHMENT 1 Z-92.023 Hobson Lane Apondaltem_%t?S NORTH LI w ~ H urLAM C a i ~;Z) E y ~ a a. ' 74 Lu \ M m1 I J s SITE, ! I J (ji \s I ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-I IFt1[ 'h RYAN ` I \ Onto: 10/01/92 Scale: NONE TL 7 AO®ndANo . AgondaItem sh _ ATTACIII IENT :2 ~f MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION U November 11, 1992 The regular meeting of the Denton Planning and Zoning Commission was held on Wednesday„ November 11, 1992, at 5;00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 215 East McKinney. Present; Mike Cochran, Richard Cooper, Jim Engelbrecht, Ivan Glassock, Katie Flemming, Mary Evelyn Huey, and Melvin Willis Present from Staff. Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning and Development; Karen Feshari, Urban Planner; David Salmon, Civil Engineer; Gerald Cos rove, Water/Wastewater; Mike Bucek, Assistant City Attorney; and Olivia Carson, Secretary Chairman Engelbrecht called the meeting to order. 1. Minutes It was moved by Mr. Cochran, seconded by Mr. Glassock, and unanimously carried (6.0) to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of October 28, 1992. If. Consider removing from the table and holding a public hearing to consider rezoning of a 32.045 acre tract of land from the Agricultural District to Single Family 10 on property located on thn east side of Country Club Road, approximately 900 feet south of Hobson Lane. Twenty notices were sent to property owners within 200; 3 were receivee in favor, 1 in opposition, and 1 was undecided, Ms. Feshari presented the staff report (attached). On question from the audience, Mr. Engelbrecht said that the developer is asking for SF-10 zoning but has agreed to make the lots at the east end of the tract, SF-13. Upon question from the audience, Ms. Feshari explained that the site plan being displayed on the overhead projector is only a conceptual layout proposal and is not being reviewed for compliance with city standards. Therefore the alley that is being shown on the layout may change. Petitioner Cliff Todd stated that lie represents the owner, Fie clarified that 16-17 of the lots are in excess of 13,000 square feet. The overhead layout is a proposal and is not the final draft. They have complied with all city requirements and their proposed zoning fits in with the city's master plan. He said that they cannot control I r Agontialtem.~a P&Z Minutes (?31e.• -`Y-Z November 11, 1992 3 ~7 Page 2 the quality of the homes once the lots are sold. Mr. Cochran asked what type of deed restrictions are being proposed. Mr. Todd replied that they have 13 pages of sample restrictions including minimum house size, rear-facing garages, landscaping, and an architectural control committee. Mr. Cochran asked who would be on the committee. Mr, Todd said that it would consist of three people including the developer, and would eventually be the responsibility of the homeowners association. Mr. Engelbrecht asked about the alley. Mr. Todd answered that they are planning to do an alley around the development They will not insist on an ally at the east end but do feel that the alley will make the development more attractive than one with front facing garages. The market now is for 1,800 square foot houses. Mr. Engelbrecht asked about the fence along the eastern boundary. Mr. Todd said that they are willing to put one up if that is desired, In favor, No one was present to speak in favor of the petition. Mr. Cooper arrived at I the meeting. Opposed; Sam Lawson, 1446 Oak Forrest, thanked the Commission for tabling the petition at the last meeting and thanked the developer for coming to the neighborhood meeting. The purpose of the meeting was for the neighborhood to see if they liked the developer's proposal. They question whether it would be good to have a step down from SF-16 to SF-10. Forrestridge is SF-16. The consensus is that SF-13 would be a better zoning district since the property abuts SF-16. They want to maintain their property value. Taey want homes to be a minimum of 2,200 square feet. They would support SF-13 zoning as a buffer and to have a gradual step down. Many years have been put into the southwestern growth of Southridge, Montecito, and Forrestridge. The current proposal is for two steps down. Homes are a family's biggest investment. He asked everyone present that is opposed to the zoning to stand up, He asked the Commission to please consider that Denton wants this area y: 1u~endaNo._-_ p&Z Minutes November 11, 1992 page 3 down here, the residents if wthere is a step to be kept as a pe ~ ie din ~rtUS` ew The residents, next ant the existing type of growth tract will h in the area to continue. nd called ats resented resident of Forrestridge ae~ lion to the ac t he is a re per k at the overall picture. What is hen°sg presented like ry Slack stated tha The re that the residents have tried to 1 tonight is the same as was presented at the last meeting. to see a less ea feel that drastic change. SF-13 isi nthe ot in the middle. tt., people Of the ar a drop from SF-16 to SF-10 zoning r r Hi hview Circle, stated that he was the first home builder in 1978 Richard Cooney, g when the property was zoned SF-16. Now t ~frFQrres oridgee11 and that was denied, An attempt was made to increase the density phases. The integrity has been maintained Rod 'gstated that she owns 48 acres of property , 3301 Country Club Club Road to Forrestridge. Mary Tisher, osed subdivision that runs from Country preliminary plat has not south of this prop She is not opposed to a subdivision but is concerned that the Her father and have to tom leted. She is concerned that another cree rntb~ ndary be to and doesn't been p garages and alleys along like a steam of g' ro ert concur with her opinions. sister which co-own the p p y Lynn Dower, 19'Tlmbergreen Circl1 s5hecsstnot sure0that this haslb entconsidered damage to the value of their home-' She implored the Commission to think o The alley will be Wi next a0 to their hoertmeyvalues. The, what this zoning W,... backing up The residents hat he is concesnoe~ about ul in terms of compromise- Ron Ewing state%i t o meeting up to 1Veln~t been with the, developer was no are a reasonable group of people. The house sizes and other concerns addressed. 19 Rolling Bills Circe, stated that the staff has recommended SF•1 el Sha it meets requirements, if th e developer had asked for SF-13, that To would e also the Bill Shay, h uirernents and it would have made a big differencehave met the t'eq romise. They can ,t do anything else with lots on the cul,de-sac bigger is no comp He asked that the Commission turn down the SF-i0. The residents wool them welcome SF-13. a \ Agenda Itam_!eS.'a~..._ P&Z Minutes November 11, 1992 Page 3 to be kept as a premium area for new residents. If there is a step down here, the next tract will have even denser uses. The residents want the existing type of growth in the area to continue. Pent' Slack stated that he is a resident of Forrestridge and called a:tentirm to the fact that the residents have tried to look at the overall picture. What is being presented tonight is the same as ti-vas presented at the last meeting. The residents would like to see a less drastic change, SF-13 is in the middle. The people o of the area feel that a drop from SF-16 to SF-10 zoning is not in the best interest. Richard Cooney, Highview Circle, stated that he was the first home builder in 1978 when the property was zoned SF-16. Now there are four sections of Forrestridge. An attempt was made to increase the density of Forrestridge II and that was denied. The integrity has been maintained through four phases. Mary Tisher, 3301 Country Club Road, stated that she owns 48 acres of property south of this proposed subdivision that runs from Country Club Road to Forrestridge, She is not opposed to a subdivision but is concerned that the preliminary plat has not been completed. She is concerned that another street will have to be in and doesn't like a stream of garages and alleys along her northern boundary. Her father and sister which co-own the property concur with her opinions. Lynn Dower, 19 Timbergreen Circle, stated that SF-10 zoning would do tremendous damage to the value of their homes. She is not sure that this has been considered. The alley will be next to their property. She implored the Commission to think of what this zoning will do to their home values. Ron Ewing stated that he is concerned about the alley backing up to his lot. The meeting with the developer was not so fruitful in terms of compromise. The residents are a reasonable group of people. The house sizes and other concerns have not been addressed. Bill Shay, 19 Rolling Hills Circle, stated that the staff has recommended SF-10 because it meets requirements. If the developer had asked for SF-13, that woul,; also have met the requitements and it would have made a big difference. To mak.~ the lots on the cul-de-sac bigger is no compromise. They can't do anything else with them. He asked that the Commission turn down the SF-10. The residents would welcome SF-13. .r~ 1 ~S 1 Agendaitem_ A2S s A•-•- Nto p&Z Minutes 1,7 November 11, 1992 Page 4 Rebuttal: Mr. Todd said that they are proposing 11800 and 2,000 minimum square foot homes. That is comparable with Forrestridge. He got a copy of their deed restrictions from the County Clerk. Conversations with appraisers said that there would be no bad effect on local property values. An audience member said that the minimum home sizes in Forrestridge are 2,400 sq. feet. Mr. Engelbrecht asked Mr. Todd if he had considered SF-13. Mr. Todd said that they considered it after the neighborhood meeting and then rejected it. They don't think there is a market for it. Mr. Willis asked who did the research on house sizes. M:.Todd said that they talked with local real estate people. Thev said that in south Denton there is a need for $150,000-200,000 homes. They plan to immediately proceed with platting. Mr. Engelbrecht asked if there will be another exit from the cul-de-sac. Mr. Todd said that there will be another street stub out. It will not be built on anyone else's property. Mr. Engelbrecht pointed out that there were very few exits to the alley on the south side. Mr. Todd said that the drawing has not been engineered. Mr. Cochran asked how wide the lots are and how far away the subdivision is from the entrance to Forrestridge. Mr. Todd replied that the lots are 80' X 120' deep and it is six or seven tenths of a mile to the entrance of Forrestridge. Ms. Flemming asked what kind of buffer will be between Forrestridge and this subdivision. Mr. Todd said that currently there is a 25' pipeline right-of-way. He considered n Ananda ltern-_!eS-_ '4(-519.__ P&Z Minutes 7 November 11, 1992 Page 5 3 screening fence but some people didn't want that. Mr. Cochran asked how dense the trees tare along the boundary. Ms. Dower said that they are not very dense. Mr. Bucek clarified that the developer has no responsibility to bring anything forward at this point. The issue here is what zoning category should be next to SF-16 zoning. The developer is not held to the drawing that is being shown. The Commission is now considering whether there needs to be buffering between two residential districts. Ms. Feshad explained that the easement is part of the back yards of Forrestridge. The Denton Development Plan does not make reference to lot sizes. In analyzing policies, it makes reference to residential uses, not lot sizes. Nearby is a PD with general retail uses, 34 zero lot line homes, and 220 multi-family units. In evaluating land use, the transition between that and SF-16 is considered. Staff is recommending approval of Z-92.023 with the condition that lots abutting Forrestridge I & 11 be no less than 13,000 square feet. The concept plan for the Planned Development was approved in 1985. In 1986, a detailed plan was submitted for zero lot lines. In 1987, a detailed plan was done for the multi-family. Staff would have to evaluate whether that meets the current requirements. If so, they could go ahead and plat. If not, the Planning and Zoning Commission would have to consider a plan but there would be no public hearing. The general retail would require a detailed site plan. There is only one SF-13 zoning in town. Mr. Engelbrecht asked how many instances [here are of SF-16 being next to SF-10 there are in town. Mr. Robbins said that there are 8-10. Chairman Engelbrecht closed the public hearing. Mr. Robbins read policies from the Denton Development Plan. Mr. Engelt:recht stated that it is important to recognize the difference between zoning and platting. Zoning establishes minimum sizes. Each residential zoning district has a minimum lot size. The lot depths of the SF-I3 and SF-10 are the same but the widths are different. The zoning map indicates that there are a number of areas of SF-16 located next to SF-10 in the same eaea of town. It is curious that / `JI 1 J Agendaltatr, ~ P&Z Minutes November 11, 1992 Page 6 there is not more use of SF-13. It has not been used as a transition. He does not recall opposition to an SF-10 transition before. There are no connecting roadways. There is some concern about controlling the type and construction of homes. The alley can be addressed at the platting stage. What the Commission does will not set precedent for other SF-16 zoning in the City. This situation is unique because only a small section of this subdivision abuts Forrestridge and there is no through traffic. Ms. Huey asked if the Planning and Zoning Commission will be able to make a decision about the alley when the plat comes before them. Mr. Robbins said yes. The alley will have to meet subdivision regulations. Those do not, however, speak to buffers. Mr. Cochran said that the precedent has been set for this type of zoning situation. A 10,000 square foot lot is not inherently inferior. The entrance to this subdivision is not near Forrestridge. There does not have to be any contact between the two subdivisions. He moved to recommend approval of Z-92-023 with the condition recommended by staff. Mr. Glasscock said that he understands the concerns but looking at the overall zoning, the fact that the entrance is not near Forrestridge, and that the abutting tracts will be SF-13, he has to second the motion. Mr. Cochran said that tie hopes the developer will address some of the concerns during the platting process. Ms. Flemming asked about the minimum house sizes. Mr. Bucek explained that house size is beyond the scope of zoning. The Texas Supreme Court has not ruled on whether cities can mandate house sizes and it would be chancy to try to do so. It could be called arbitrary and capricious. Mr. Engelbrecttt said that he is guided by 1) this is a common approach in zoning that is used frequently, 2) SF-13 has not been use,.! The one SF-13 tract that was zoned was not developed that way, and 3) there will be no traffic from this development or other major impact on Forrestridge. Motion to approve Z-92.023 with conditions carried (6-1). Mr. Cooper voted no. CITY - COUNCIL Lj+ X: T 1, - zoo 0 f X0000 1_ ~0000~ a n N AO C C7 O O JOOOOQ~aaacaoa°°°~ - - X X-M la T Agen~No. w....~ A~er~daltatrt,.... PATE ; December 8 1992 / 17 CITY COUNCYL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the city council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Sign Ordinance RECOMMENDS Tom: The Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendations are attached. Proposed schedule: December 8, 1992: Public hearing, council directs ordinance be drafted. considers the January 5, 1993: Public hearing, council ordinance. SUMMARY: See the attachment and the previously provided "Sign Book." i council may wish to direct staff to prepare an amending ordinance after the public hearing. i BACKGROUND: ow~j City that hold a ohearingibe held on December 8, 91992 directed ted that a a public Council indicated that consideration oc an ordinance would be at a later date. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS pFFEC ED: All who see Denton. Flggh IMPACT: None. Respectfully submitted: Llo d V. Harrell City Manager Apenda No. - P Agendaffem_ S,4 Prepared by: 7 .J Fra k Robbins, AICP Executive Director Planning and Development Approved: / Frank H. Robbins AICP Executive Director Planning and Development I Attachment: Summary of the Planning and Zoning Commission Report, AXX002'30 PAGF 2 4008 No AcondaItsm_. P&Z Issues and Recommendations 1, "Face changing". Recommends allowing non-conforming signs to be altered so long as they are made no more nonconform- ing. The temporary use permit/comply by January 1, 1996 provision would be deleted. 2. Abandoned signs and supporting structures. Recommends a "use or lose" provision whereby abandoned signs and support- ing structures could be used and "grand fathered" like other non-conforming signs, if the sign or supporting structure had a blank face or a bona fide sign within about (date to be specified) 90 days of passage of the ordinance. r~ 3. Effective Area Calculation Recommendations: a. Change the enolosod area shape from a parallelogram to any regular shape or combination of shapes. b. Measure each face rather than thickness. e. Measure copy area only of signs on walls, fences or buildings (Clarification: The method that is used now). 4. Special. Sign District. Decrease the qualifying frontage from 600 feet to 300 feet. 5. Monument Signs: Recommends defining monument signs and increasing the effective area for monument signs on Loop 288 from 150 sq, ft. to 200 sq. ft, and on IH-35 from 250 sq. ft, to 300 sq. ft. 6. Allow "banners" on building walls without a permit or standards, P&Z recommends denial, and recommends adding a 30 day separation period between permits and requiring display of a permit tag on permitted wind devices. 7. Disallow bannr;irs over, streets. No recommendation. 8. Temporary and stake signs. Recommends establishing a new category of regulated signs called temporary signst put stake signs in this category. Allow any sized "stake" to support the temporary sign. 9. Increase the height standard of signs along IH35. No recommendation. 10. National Flags, Permit national flags with specified limits. No recommendation. 11. Sign Separation: Recommends allowing 60 foot separation rather than 400 foot separation between signs on one premise where two or more signs are allowed. AXXOD230 3 A~entlaPlu. ~ 4andaRama fa;to la 12. clarification issues. Wording changes to clarify existing standards and procedures. See Enclosure 1. 13. P&Z also heard testimony recommending other changes, but recommends no change and did not consider further research or analysis of isisues listed in Enclosure 2. 14. Fees. P&Z recommends adding a fee of $75.00 for signs over 250 square feet, and a $50.00 fee for special exception petitions. ~ I J AXX00230 A p e a d a l t a m~.!~--5-~ P `~y-~--- Enclosure 1 £ P&Z clarificsationIssues Reozo=en~!ed by on August 12, 1992 1, Authorize an applicant for a planned development district to utilize the special sign district regulations without meeting the 000 foot frontage requirement. 2. Add additional standards for approval to the special sign district regulations relating to traffic safety and aesthet- ics 0. Clarify in the PD section of the zoning ordinance the stan- dards under which deviations from the general sign re Matt ns will be approved within a PD dc as sign die Sat. applicable to approval of a special 4. Add the definition of front yard: y n~,xd= An open, unoccupied space on a lot facing a ro street extending across the front of a lot between the side setback for the line") . districtsinad from te 11which main, "buildingspecified 5, Add to the definition of wall sign: 11 i means any sign, der a, find device sue, W~ affixed to, supported by, or pa nted upon the wall of wholly any building, and which is not a projecting sign. 6. Add wind device signs to the type of signs allowed in the CBD: Type, Ground, wall, roof, stake, win"oy-i-Op projecting signs are permitted in central business di.stri.cts. STAFF MOTE; This issue may be reviewed again in the context of the banner issue. 7. Clarify language associated with removal. of unlawful si.anst sign which is erected, located, or of e 4n(A Or or. Any al a suing offici olation of oprovideds herein. m The eBuilding by the Building official shall delivar or send a written notice •str~uts S. Add definitions for collector, arterial, and freeway as shown on the Thoroughfare and Coll.ector Street Mapsgtrict noa residential: zoand ning` district Ostandardsg section. 9 to d ththe ey outoor street maps. axxno2so Y Y \ Agenda ND,,._ Agendaltem 4S 10. Create a fee of $75.00 for signs larger than two hundred f 4y' (250) square feet in effective area. 11. Add illuminated sign setback standards in residential dis- tricts, the same as for non-residential districts. 12. Simplification. Staff proposes to develop a separate document from the ordinance that summarizes the ordinance standards, and has detailed graphics explaining and nhowing the applica- tion of the standards. I AXX0023D Agorl No, A98MBROM lee's Enclosure 2 Issuebsy p&Z on Au~gustl 2,7 1992 review 1. Treat religious signs differently. 2. Allow signs on utility poles. 3. Allow 20 foot tall signs on streets where a G foot tall sign is now allowsd 4. Definition of a sign. square feel: where Allow the maximum size of signs up to 100 5, square feet. the maximum sie is 6o 6, sign height should be a function of setback. and returned Allow portable signs to be remo`,ed from promise within 4s hours. g, Allow 48 hour temporary use of Portable signs. g, Separate "face changing" from ether issues and deal with sooner. 1 hxxooz3o a 1 I CITY COUNCIL i f - i i i i . , ppvpa ~ ~UUU .1- UQ,O r -ON, T xr, AAetrlNo..l.DATE: Dp r C'. cimY cov,_ N~I~~EPORT ~ TO: Mayor rand Members of the City Council FROM. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Z-92-028, Downzoning I) D 68 to Agricultural District RECOUNDATg : The Planning and zoning November 11, 1992, Commission, at their meeting of , recommended approval 7-0. 9uM_ARY Rezone a 77,6 acre tract of Development District to the land from the Planned property located on the east side ofiFM12181~ aDistrict on one-half mile north of Ryan Road, pproximately $AC G OU!~J Sea Planning and zoning report, 280 LW- bEPAKT- NT I GROU S A FEC T~Fp t Building Inspections, Planning and Development: Department. F SCAL IMpAc I N/A Respec ~ ally submitted: Prepared by: Z'-~ Llo X. V. Harrell - City Manager Ka en K. esharij Urba nPlannor Approvedt Ail Ii. R~ obbins ATCp - Executive Director Planning and Development AXX0024C h A~onda Na \ Agenda ltam._ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF' THE CITY OF DF.NTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT NO. 68 TO AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 77.6 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF FM 2181 APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF MILE NORTH OF RYAN ROAD; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF) AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Arthur N. Johnson has applied for a change in zoning for 77.6 acres of land from Planned Development Zcraing District No. 68 to Agricultural zoning district classification and use designation; and WHEREAS, on November 11, 1992, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the requested change in zoning; i WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the change in zoning will be in compliance with the Denton Development Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, I THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I That the zoning district classification and use designation of the 77.6 acres of land described in Exhibit A, attached to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference, is changed from Planned Development Zoning District No. 68 to Agricultural zoning district classification and use designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the city of Denton, Texas. I SECTION Ii. That the city's official zoning map is amended to show the change in zoning district classification, SECTION III That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $2,000. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. S CTION IV, That this ordinance shall become eff.active fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the city secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage, PASSED AND APP,.<OVED this the day of 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR t` s 3 BOB CASTT,EBERRY, MAYOR" ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BYJ APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY:/// i I r PAGE 2 EXHIBIT "All E1I0G ALL THAT CERTAIN TEA07 OR PARCEL OF LAND ILTUATED 19 THE BENJAMIN LRVIR SUIVRY, A13TRACT 769, AND THE JEREMIAH FISHER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 411, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING PART OF 1 /t{S8pl1flN0. /C/. CALLED 78,112 ACTS TRACT DESCRIBED IR A DEED FROM HENRY S. MILLSR AQOltdall8~ ~ REALTY TRUST TO L,.R. HERKIMER ON DECEMBER 27, 1978, RECORDED IN VOLUME 980, PAO% 689, DEID RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, AND BEING 4OXE ./,~...r_. PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS POLLOUSi BEGINNING AT AN IRON ROD AT A PENCE CORNER AT IRE SOUTHEAST -Illy Cn44r.R Of SAID LEWIS SURVEY, AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAI7 HERKIMER TRACTI THENCE NORIN 88 DEGREES 49 MINUTES HEST WITH THE 5011TH LIVE OF SAID SURVEY A DISTANCE OF 603.5 FEET TO A STEEL POST Ifl CONCRETE) THENCE NORTH I DEGREE 49 4INUTES 42 SECONDS EAST 981.81 FEET 70 STEEL POST IN CONCRETSI THENCE NC.1TH 88 DE0111E3 43 4INUTSS 52 SECONDS WEST 387.19 7 :9 A STEEL POST IN CONCRSTEI THENCE SOUTH 14 DEGREES 11 414VTKS OS SECONDS WEST 104.30 FEET TO A STEEL POST IN CONORST11 THENCE SOUTH 72 D901995 37 MINUTES VEST A DISTANCE OF 53$.13 FEET TO AN IRON 100 AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF A 0.5 ACRI TRACT DESCRIBED IN A DEED lCOM L.R. RERXIMII TO GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHWEST ON 79BROARY 26, 1981s RECORDED IN VOLUME I 11301 PACE $71, DEED 11COIDSI THENCE NORTH 17 DEGREES 23 MINUTES WEST A DISTANCE Of 7i-97 FEET TO AN IRON PINI THENCE SOUTH 72 DE07EE9 37 MINUTIA 'ASST A DISTANCE OF 313.16 FEET TO AN IRON ROD ON THR BAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF FARM 4ARXE7 ROAD 21611 THENCE NORTH 33 DECRIES 43 41MUTES WEST WITH SAID RIONT-OF-WAT 15.66 FSST TO A WOOD RIGHT-OP-WAT POST AT IRK 8601111NINO OF A CURVET THENCE NORTHWRST91LT VIYH SAID RIGHT-OP-WAY AROUND A CURVE TO T43 RIGHT HAYING A CENTRAL AVOLE OF 14 DE0RES8 12 MINUTES 54 SECONDS, A RADIUS OP 2805.1 FEE-T, A CHORD OF NORTH 26 DEGREES OS 4INUTSS $7 SECONDS WEST 694.16 FEETi AND AR ARC LENGTH Of 695.95 FEET TO A WOOD RIGHT-OF-WAY POST1 THENCE NORTH 18 DEGREES 51 41MUTIS IS S80OIDS WEST WIT4 SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY 377.67 FEET TO A PRICE CORMERI TRE11UE SOUTtI 88 DEGREES 58 MINUTES EAST HITN A FENCI 797.6 FEET TO All IRON ROIDI THENCE NORTH 1 DEOSEE 46 MINUTES EAST WITH A PENCE ON THE L111c' EETWESM SAID LEWIS AND FISHER SURVEYS 803.6 FEET TO A PENC. CORNERI { THENCE SOUTH 88 010REE3 54 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST WITR A FENCE L 568.9 ?SRI TO A FEtICE CORNER ON THE EAST BCIINOARY LINE OF SAIDLEWIS SURVEYI I THEROE SOUTH 1 DEGREE 44 MINUTES 39 SECONDS W99T WITH AN OLD PENCE ON SAID IURVEY LINE 2265.50 FEET TO THE PLACE OF 18=14IHO, AND CONTAINING IN ALL 77.600 ACRES. INN Aa adoNo.,.. Apendaitnm._/e~ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT Tot Mayor and Members of the City Council Case NO$$ Z-92-028 Meeting Date: 12/08/92 GENERAL INFORMATION Applioanbt Arthur N. Johnson 3371 Forest Glen Dr, Denton, TX 76205 (817) 321-2898 Current owners Same Requested Actions mixed°nuse Planned Development No. 68 from a district. Location aad Sixet A 77.6 acre tract of land located on the east side of FM 2181, south of Sundown Ranch, north of Lakewood Mobile Home Park and the KDNT ra0io tower.. Surrounding Land use and zonings North - Agricultural and SUP (Sundown Ranch, planned for horse training facility) South - Agricultural and SUP (Lakewood MHP) East - Agricultural West - Teasley (F'M 2181), SUl' for mobile home park and Agricultural zoning Denton Development Plant Low Intensity Area, 3 Agenda No Agenda it8in_ s ' _m~. Case Z-92-028) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportations Zoning from the Planned Development district to the Agricultural district will have no significant effect on transportation. If this tract is divided into one (1) acre or • larger lots, normal subdivision regulations will apply. If the property is left as one lot, as proposed, no sidewalk improvements will be required. One (1) access to FM 2181 will be permitted preferably lined up with Denton West Mobile Home J Park entrance. If property is further divided, type and amount 1 of improvements will depend on lot sizes and configuration. i Utilitiest A 20' utility easement may be required along FM 2181 at time of platting Waters The nearest City water available is located at the intersection of FM 2181 and Ryan Road. If the applicant wishes, he may apply for an alternative system (water well). Severs As there are no city sewer lines are not yet extended to this site, the applicant must submit and be approved for an alternative system (septic system). Drainages Zoning from the Planned Development distztct to the Agricultural, district will have no significant effect on drainage, HISTORY Vr On March 13, 1984, the city Council approved a Planned Agenda Agenda ftem_ (Case Z-92-028) Page Three ~~JJ HISTORY (Continued) Development zoning district and a site plan for this tract of land (PD 68, ordinance 84-29). This plan was approved for mixed uses consisting of single family, two-family, multi-family, office, and neighborhood services usage. A trip allocation of 4686 was approved. On November 11, 1992, the Planning and zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and recommended approval (7-0) of 7,-92-028, ANALYSIS This property is located in a. low intensity area, specifically in study area # 77 which is currently in an overallocated status of 1871. By downzoning this tract of land to the Agricultural district 2715.14 intensity trips would be eliminated, thus helping this particular area regain a low intensity status. The applicant is requesting the zoning change for the purpose of building his home and farming the land. The rezoning request complies with all policies of the Denton Development Plan. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-92-028 (7-0). ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. PD 68 site plan and ordinance 84-29 3. Study area #77 AAA00RD 3 Aganda Na. ~..~r Agenda ATTACHMENT 2-92-02$ Johnson i~ NORTH ,01 VVv ().r \ 11 .a. A nU ` a P S9 it '004, OLD Dates 10/30/92 Scalet NONE ,n 1 ~I 1 Apida No, _ t'~ Apentlaltom_~s w~' G_, 41Io.___~. ' Y?1 aT'rM11MrrrT 2 n- AN ORDINA,;CE AMENDING THE 2ONIIG MAP OF THE CITY OF DE'Vo'41 , TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX To THE CODE JF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY or DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE No. 69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 78,112 ACRES OF L,V;D OUT OF THE BENJAMIN LEWIS SURVEY, ABSTRACT No. 769, A;tD rii F. JE61LAH FISHER SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 421, DENTON COUNTY, TEX,,i; AND if ORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; AN0 DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. The Zoning Classification and Use designation of the follox~ ing described property, to•wtc: Being all that certain tract or parcel of land situated in t1•.e BanJam'.n '.avl.c 3urvoy, Abstract No. 169, and the Jeremiah Flsh,er Survey, !tract No. 421, Denton County, Texas, being part of a called acre tract described in A deed from Henrv S. Miller :i.'-.1 •i Trust to 1.. R. Herkimer on Decotbur 27, 1978, records'. Volume 980, Page 889, Deed Records of said r;ounty, and bei,,g -oa particularly described as follows BEOLMNIrt7 ir an Iron rod at a fence corner at the southeast corner of -,,Ed I,awis Survey, and the southeast corner of said Herkimer :,net; 'HENCE north 38°49' vest with the south lino of said surveys distAnco of 603.5 feet to a steel post in concrete; THENCE north 1°49'42" oast 981,81 feet to A steel post in concrete; THENCE north 68°41'52" wesc 387.89 foot to a scael post in concrete; THENCE south W ll'03" vest 309,30 feet to a steel post in concrete; THENCE south 72°37' vest a dis tancu of 555.13 feet to an iron rod at thn southeast corner of a 0.5 acre tract described in e deed from L. R. Herkimer to Cenoral relephnne Company of tna Southwest on February 26, 1982, rucorded in Volume 1130, Page 571, Dead Records; THENCE north 11°23' west a distance of 71,97 foot to 4n irou pin; THENCE south 12°37' vest a diatanco of 313.16 feel. to an iron rod on the east right of way of Farm Market Road 2181; THENCE north 33°43' west with said right of way 15.66 feet to a wood right of way post at the beginning of a curve, THENCE northwasr.erly with said right if way around a curve tc the right having a central angle of 14°12'54", a radius of 2805.1 feet, a chord of north 26 05'57" vest 694.16 foot, and an art, length of 695.95 feet to a wood right of •iay post; TM11CE north 16°51'15" west with said rig;it of way 377.67 font to 4 fence corner; Z-1634/WAL'rF.R H, DeRONLE/PAGE 1 1- + . ~ ~ ~ r rl-~-,-••---- it 1 Agonda No. AgantlaHem_ oL T1IENCE south 88°58' east with a fence 797.6 feet to an it rod; j TNENC'd north 1046' east with a fence on the line between said Lewis and Fisher Survays 803.6 feet co a fence corner; TWICE south 88°54'20" east with a fence [566.9 feet to a fence corner on the east boundary line of said Lewis Survey; THENCE south 1°44'39" west with an old fence on said surveyy line 2265.50 feet to the place of beginning and containing La all 17.600 acres. s Is hereby changed from Agricultural "A" District Claastficatton Usa to planned Development "PD" District Ciasstficat'.on and Use under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Taxes with the following conditions and specifications; 1. Specific site plait app royal is required for the office/retail, neighborhood service, medium density residential sections end the portion of the multi- family restricted directly north of the fourplax use. 2- Final utility layout, street alignment, curb cut and driveway looation and overall plans for access shall be determined during the site plan approval and/or plat processing stage; n0 driveways or curb cuts shall be permitted on N 2161 vd 3. A twanty-five (25) foot setback along the P1 2181 frontage for the offlce/retail and neighborhood service uses shall be required. Tits area shall be " landscaped and used as groenspace, No parking shall be allowed in this area, 4, There Shall be a maximum height of two (2) stories fur buildings in the office/retail and neighborhood service sections. 5, There shall be a maximum of two (2) detached signs allowed In the offlce/retail and neighborhood service sections. The height and location of those signs will 'oe determined during site plan approval. 6. No portable signs shall be allowed in any areas of thin development. 7. The proposed thirty (30) foot greenbelt shall be extended along the northern boundary of the medium density residential section to the first proposed Colldetot street. 6. An Adequate Screening device shall be constructed along the northern boundary of the medium density residential section between the proposed first and second collector striate, 9. The development shall conform with the approval PD saw, concept plan, 10, RLght-of•way consistent with Ilighway Department requlramencs and projections for future need shall be d9dicaced or. the preliminary and final plat. 11, if 25 percent of the development, with a minimur, of 5 percent single family, la not developed within five (5) years, zoning will revert to Its previous a9riculuural (A) classification. Z-1634/IIALTM H. DeRONPE/PAOB 2 7 I AgenttaNi~m_S_ ~~pp io? -~--gam The Zoning Nap of the City op alw6li;'"TFf`'As-.-"1?MrM the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code cf Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, under Ordinance No. 69-1, be, and the same is hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and Use subject to tho above conditions and specifications, ",~1~•• SECTION It. ~ That the City Council of oho Cityy of Denton, Texas, horebv finds that such change is in accord anca with a comprehaos ive plan for the purpaae of promoting the general welfata of the. City of Denton Texas, and vith reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view tLa conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encourapting the most approprLate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens. SECTION 111. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effuct Smmediately after its ppassage and approval, the required public hearings having herecnfora been hall by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after giving due notice thereof, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of Narch, 1984, CI OF NTON,AT E7G1 iA ATTEST: /1~G~117t~ CMMU l E- ALLP4 I aLLM iARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FOR,`1: C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CIT'd OF DENTON, TEXAS eY Z-1636NALTER 4. DeRONDE/PAGE 3 ~tt l AjendaNo AQande Item /j. .I,I: 1~1~ III = r * rte.. 1.1 Win: .1 I 1~~ 1 tot" - ~ `y1 1 • r . 1 p ! '!t Ij ryl .r . r OKI- 1 L r. .E ~ IS ~ r I I ?'r ti~ rti l I! . ( 1111fr 11/I l~llt I a l ' 11111/il el/l~ilb rl IT 1' ~i ~ 111 1 I 1 1 r ~I INTENBiTY AREA 77 ATTACHMENT 3 SI21 1327.1() ACRES BOUNDARY DCBCRIPTION A~~endaNo 3~ Agopda ltem_~j_i East: I-35E . i J fkt1O..~~__°1✓ 1 I Westt Lillian Miller Parkway and FM 2161 ? North: A line aeparating 2P and General Retail zoning South: Robinson Road, State school Road and city limits line to I-ISE i. vv ~ • I I f~ ~ Nl I Ilf ~4 I t 1 1 i }r rte. I I *eV j I ~ I ~ 1` L . _ _ W ~lf J y k 9 y \ t I u~ II ROSS ON ROAD MCALI o~ooa_ 2~000 Ciry 00 bfNTON, rf"S . r Agenda No. ~gontlaltem~.~ r 1 LAND USE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM 117~~ PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT -CITY-OF-DENTON---- 1 Intensity area p: 77- - Type: Low Intensity trips/ac 60 Traffic survey zones: 66008 6613A Boundary Description: North: A line separating 2F and GR zoning South: Robinson, State School Rd, city limit to I-3 Date: 11/28/89 East: I-35E West: Lillian Miller Pkwy. and FM 2181 LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS CATEGORY UNITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY ACRES UNITS INTENSIT SF-16 < 17 15.79 170 0 0 0 0 0 SF-10>16 0 0 0 16.63 498.9 41.02 124 1240 SF-7>10 125 42.66 1250 5.69 238.98 136.74 536 5360 LESS SF-7 0 0 0 0 0 86.23 766 7660 MOB.HOMES 270 71.64 2700 0 0 0 0 0 DUPLEX 0 0 0 17.1 1368 35.63 302 3020 MF-R 0 0 0 0 0 4.7 32 256 MF-1&2 0 0 0 0 0 78.07 1616 12928 COM/RET 0 17.85 11602.5 4.53 2944.5 87.52 0 56888 OFFICE 0 0 0 0 0 17.54 0 6139 INDUSTRY 0 13.6 1428 6.7 703.5 33.52 0 3519.6 INSTI'NAL 0 145 12325 0 0 0 0 0 PARKS 0 43.09 1292.7 0 0 0 0 0 R/O/SPACE 0 13.15 0 0 0 52.63 0 0 TRANSPORT 0 68.16 0 10.26 0 0 0 0 AGRIC. 0 0 0 262,9 0 0 0' 0 VACANT 0 897.41 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 412 1328,35 30768 323.81 5754 57316 3376 97011 INTENSITY CALCULATIONS (1) Intensity area total. trips 1328.35 times 60 79701 (2) Trips allocated to existing land use 30768 (3 Trips allocated to ourrent zoning incl. P Ds (not built) 102764 (4~ Trips allocated to vacant lands not zoned plus Agric. zoning 15774 (5) Estimated unallocated intensity trips 1)minus(2)+(3)+(4) -69606 (6) Percentage of intensity trips allocated 187 1 konufa Anaiidaltarn__.2S A" / y P&,Z Minutes November 11, 1992 Page 7 III, Hold a public hearing and consider rezoning a 77,6 acre tract of land from Planned fff Development 68 to the Agricultural District on property located on the east side of FM 2181 approximately one-half mile north of Ryan Road, Notices were mailed to six property owners within 200 feet; one reply form was received in favor of the petition and none in opposition. J Staff Report: Ms, Feshari presented the staff report (attached), Petitioner: Bud Johnson of Corinth stated that he purchased the property and intends to put in a home and live there many years raising cattle, i No one was present to speak in favor or in opposition to the petition, Recommendation: Ms, Feshari stated that staff recommends approval of Z-92.028, Chairman Engelbrecht closed the public hearing, Mr, Glasscock moved to recommend approval of Z-92.028, Motion was seconded by Mr. Cochran and carried unanimously (7.0), IV, -Hold a public hearing to consider rezoning a 6,052 acre tract of land from Planned Development 69 to the Office District on property located at the northwest corner of West Oak and Bonnie Brae, known as the Vintage Retirement Center, 17 notices were mailed to property owners within 200% 1 was returned in favor of the y petition and none In opposition. Staff Report: Ms, Feshari presented the staff report (attached), Petitioner: Mr, Charles Holbrook stated that the new owners of the Vintage would like to have a storage building. The site is now zoned Planned Development so It became necessary to change the zoning in order to get the storage, The new owners are committed to improving the facility and are redoing the interior, They will attempt to be good neighbors. Mr, Cochran asked how long the temporary storage would be In place, Mt, Holbrook said that they would need it for 12.24 months during construction„ P&Z Minutes November 11, 1992 Page 7 111, Hold a public hearing and tonsider rezoning a 77.6 acre tract of land from Planned Development 68 to the Agri, ultural District on property located on the east side of FM 2181 approximately ore-half mile north of Ryan Road. Notices were mailed to six property owners within 200 feet; one reply form was received In favor of the petition and none In opposition, Staff Report: Ms. Feshari presented the staff report (attached), Petitioner: Bud Johnson of Corinth stated that he purchased the and intends to put in a home and live there many years raising cattle. property No one was present to speak in favor or in opposition to the petition, Recommendation: Ms, Feshari stated that staff recommends approval of Z-92-028• Chairman Engelbrecltt closed the public hearing. I I Mr, Crlasscock moved to recommend approval of Z-92-028• Motion was seconded by Mr. Cochran and carried unanimously (7-0)• 1V, ' Hold a public hearing to consider rezoning a 6,052 acre tract of land from Planned i Development 69 to the Office District on property located at the northwest corner of West Oak and Bonnie Brae, known as the Vintage Retirement Center, 17 notices were mailed to property owners within 200; 1 was returned in favor of the petition and none in opposition, Staff Report: Ms. Feshari presented the staff report (attached). Petitioner: Mr, Charles Holbrook stated that the new owners of th.e Vintage would like to have a storage building. The site is now zoned Planned Development so It became necessary to change the zoning in order to get the storage, The new owners are committed to improving the facility and are redoing the interior. They will attempt to be good neighbors, Mr. Cochran asked how long the temporary storage would be In place, M'r, Holbrook said that they would need it for 12-24 months during construction„ Lr l J r =CITY COUNCIL I i i i i ~ooaaaooo ~a 00 or of Op0 00OOO~ i ro ^oOQO . 4 ~ d o h ~ d a O , O I~ ~ oo~~ppp ~ " i e oO~g0 1 C° Iowa No. DATE: Dec mbber,,8, 1! CITY COUNCIL REPORT~ T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council. Pa) FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Rezoning to a Conditioned General Retail district, of 10.0868 acres of land located on the north-northwest side of Mayhi.ll Rd., abutting the MK&T Railroad tracks. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval, 4 to 0, at its October 28, 1992 meeting. At this writing, landowners of more than 201 of the land within 200 feet of the rezoning have objected in writing. Therefore, six votes of the Council are necessary to approve this rezoning. Please see attachment number. 5 for the letter of opposition, SUMMARY: See attached report. BACKGROUND' See attached report. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Engineering & Transportation Department Planning and Development Department FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Respectfully submitted: 71 i 10 ZZ P repared by: Lloyd t3arroil City Manager G. Owen Yost, AST 'r Urban Planner G Approved: Atff"~ ~Frank H. Robbins AICP Executive Director Planning and Development AXX00257 1 L Agenda No Aponda Items `S, (n?u.__ k e~ o1D PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT To: ~ `Mayor and members of the City Council Case No.: Z-92-026 Meeting Dates December 8, 1992 GENERAL INFORMATION w Applicants FSB/Denton Realty Advisors, Inc. P. 0. Box 427 i Denton, Texas 76202 Current owners Ray Hallford 9400 N. Central E'xpy., Suite 1104 Dallas, Texas 75231 f Requested Actions Rezone to a conditioned General Retail district, from an Agriculture district,. The conditions ares 1. Create an 85 feet setback from the proposed right-of-way o.@ Loop 2881 2- Limit the use of Lot It Block A to a 449 feet communica- tions tower and accessory building not to exceed 400 square feet, 3. Designate Lot 1, Block B as an undevelopable tract, 4. Frequencies to be used must be authorized by the Federal Communications; Commission, Location and Sizes 10.0868 acres, located on the north-northwest: side of Mayhill Road, west of and adjacent to the MK&T Railroad trar;ks. Surrounding Land Use and zonings Northeast - Agricultural zoning. The site abuts the MK&T right-of-way, beyond which is undeveloped land owned by the Andrew Corp. Awds No, b.bT1M~ AperidaIIn_ XS Otte (Case - Z-92-026) Page 2 South - Agricultural zoning. The site has minimal frontage on Mayh.ill Road, on both sides of which is heavily-wooded, undeveloped land. (There is also a small sliver of P.D. 91 to the south.) West - Planned Development No. 91, which proposes light induotrial uses on this tract. Currently, the f'low land is undeveloped. Denton Development Plans The site is located in an Urban center. SPECIAL INFORMATION T^ Transportation: The applicant, in the platting process, Is dedicating 120 feet of right-of-way, for the proposed Loop 288. This routing is according to the agreed-on alignment when the adjacent: land was zoned Planned Development. The site has only 9,89 feet of frontage onto Mayhill Road, not 30 feet as is required. However, the applicant received a variance of' September 4, 1992 from the Citizens Traffic Safety Commission, allowing a 9 feet drive. No sidewalk will. be requirea along the proposed Loop 288 since there is no projected construction date for the loop, and no need is created by +-a proposed communication tower for a sidewalk. utilities: The developable portion of the site will have access to a 12- inch water line on Mayhill Read. It does not have access to an existing sewer line. However, no water/wastewater service is warranted by the proposed use. Drainages The applicant is dedicating a drainage easement via the final plat. If the land use is limited as proposed, there will be no drainage improvements required. 1: the zoning allows a more r intense use, however, downstream improvements may be required. 1 Agentlalten (Case - Z-92-026) Page 3 Other: 1 The proposal. for a 449 feet communication tower in this location has been approved by the Federal Aviation Administra- tion (Attachment 2). HISTORY The site was annexed into the corporate limits of Denton in 1984. At the time, it was included in an Agricultural zoning district. Since that time there has been no zoning activity on the land. ANALYSIS According to the Denton Development Plan, the site is in an Urban Center. Proportionate share analysis and intensity trip allocation analysis are not performed within Urban Centers. i RECOMMENDATION Due to its adherence to all policies of the Denton Development Plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of General Retail zoning, conditioned ont 11 The creation of an 85 feet setback from the future right-of.-way of Loop 288; 2. Limitation of the use of Lot 1, Block a to a 449 feet communication tower, and an accessory building not exceeding 400 square feet.. 3. Designation of Lot 1, Block B as an undevelopable tract of land, 4. Securing authorization of frequencies to be used from the Federal Communications Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. (Case - Z-92-026) Page 4 w ALTERNATIVES M 1. Approve with the recommended conditions. 2. Approvei with modified conditions. 3. Deny petition, 2. Postpone to a date certain. 3. Table. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location map, 2. FAA Permit. 3. Commission Minutes. 4. Draft Ordinance. S. Letter of opposition, ~xxoa2s9 AGlendaNo.._...., w_ Agar da ltorra. ~;e ATTACHMENT l P-92-029 Lembard Addition do NORTH ~4\ 1 \ rIlk . ~r - 7o~ SITE r f f I ' II ,i I - - - I~ fL=i Date. 11/30/92 Scales NONE ♦i 1 ABenda Item ATTACHMENT P-92-029 Lombard Addition NORTH _ J7 ~ J atom JJ ~ _ SITE I I dll ~ 'I :I D I Date: 11/30/92 Scale: NONE Vale 'i e, Atok V AIM To ATTACIIML•'N'P 2 "poNAVVIGALeTUOr us Deoctr tnwf ND. 91-ASW-2042-0 E or Vansoxx l`J stir SySouthWOet Region T Fed*1`0 Mlon Adminlsirn►bn etem ManaRaleent Dranch A11Ond3Nb._.... Fort Worth, Texac 76193-0510 A9011d81t6114- ACKNOWLEDQMENT OF NOTICE OF PROpOBED CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION 1,,y/dd CONSTRUCTION LOCA110H RAY HALLFPRD nuclt+w ONI CALLERXA 'POWER SUITE 135 75244 DENTON, TEXAS UAi.t.AS TEXAS wirupt uoNaruos 33°10'4311 97"05'12" }rEfa"T eY i till swveafit D "eovt'a6` OESCPIMION ANTENNA TOWER 44 1049 9 CONSTNUCTION PROPOUD 1.50/650/800/900 MHz @ S '250 W w il* i 1991 concermnp the re The Federal Avia"On +.dminltiral:an Mreby a4kn0wiedge4 receipt of notles died November 1.1, proposed Conslf0Ctton or alteration deacrlbed above, Aatudyhaabeencon0u4tetlundenMprovlaonaofPool 710fthe fAil otmelighallan tedl enhance Sel n o tion,whot orlupereu would be e n obstru ction to air n aviq oho n, wMlher i t Should be marked and l i~h ted to sa}ety n eU alrmennevlgai on, indkn d whether s u study are tai III notice of etM and 4ompillion 01 aonalwoton'is r/qulr*d 10 pM follows ❑ TM prcpOted COnltruGti0+0o+a nol require a notice, to FAA, ® Tied 10o ssed ccn toniion is rat Idenl'iftad es an obstruction under any standard of FAR. Pan 71, Subpart C and would not fie It wOUfd TMpfopOSedVnetructlaMsIdentifiedasenobelruatlonundertheelandar4t0IFAA,pan77,$ubpartCbuinol be a hu erd to file nevipetlon kld and Ilghled Fiat FM Advi/Ory Ci+tuur AC 70/7480•f, "Qbetrueben Marking an The Structure should be ottlr clioq ar LlghiingP Chaplere 1 Supplemental notleti, srequireds1least 48hours btlfcre1110HaAOf OOnllruOUenend withinfive daysafter00,11VuetiOAtooth" its gffiAteal helghl (use the enclosed fAA forms, unltrie 'Chit detfirmineHen a%plree on 11-1-91. (a) extended, mi"d of lerminated by Ilse 1184),19 Office; ty of the lot Ibl 00'tV lion p7'mt is ,I t O he FQC On Of before the sbpvoex ep retlOn dale. In)swb case he delafmlr l on expi res fins/ha data WWI preeerlbed by the FCC (ca Completion of conovV0110n, Or on the data the 1100 demo the 0014'00. NOTEr Any request lot extenelon 01 ire eNeetlve ucrod Of thisdetermfnabon IIlet bei postmarkedof "iyNed to the l"weig 011,44 it least 15 to determine days priof to the expbation dote, clion [3 f he whethe pit wo d 1 s aucti r%l0 as navl4 d Part nob 4rea Pfet~on 4lrany In hJuribar er tiudy,rit is prelumed the 00 e~VOIIOA wOVfd be a h1111i to Olt nsvtgatlon. Funkier study: He$ been 101141e6 by the FAA. ❑ May be requested by the tpontor within 30 day$ of date of Ih19 Adno p"Awl, vH t h above tea Nrel?, n would ❑ it the exeed Aeon 71r 0balfuctlonslO daerden IkN9h1 SO n0i Mail ft. wiedg"el will be sent to that Agency not If the Structure 1S 601e41 b) the lICe0 sl,1q fiuthorily of toe FCC, a copy at thlb 60" NOTICE IS faEdUIgEO AN'RIM9TMW P,~Q~~r ~s AS~N~~NEO 0~ T119 PROPO1 1111 1NOQIrl w 75 MNz nne authorized Airspace Specialist SruCe r,, grand inns ';INrb _ _ _ _ Ma ` 1, 1992 19SUlO 1Y y~rt~l4yt k++..-i'h"^pYeu • U.S. 0011 rMMth NI'YnrNl e11kL Il41 _ygea] pA6APolIM1440'7 0,SuPlA6tO1SPAIVIOullIbIVON SW OP-1 (2/90) Agonda Nn _ Aganda Item-. r YY u 1O N 8 Qp Q g~ g s qM C Sid i W~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a 4 N 4 i N ■ (L~ 7 1 I GOOFS cOmpletlnq this forre H it Wommonded Ihet tM foNpyrMO 40XOW tS from the Fed" Avisti00 FWGUISIlOns, Pert 77, Subch"r 9 below be reviewed. NOTICE OF ACTUAL CONSTTILICTION CM ALTERATHM ~77,1i or wmmsom 0 4wha noem 61Fr,17 Korn mw *moot rtaMa, RI faaA ~orrr ~M FAMM~ Ow~AY~p4 ~1 dwo4wo I bow p~ 0110ko EWM AYrwn rq lp lq„NM M PA" wgA'AWM WYMirWMMYMM~IWArMFAA,pWYIdNrNNAOpFMmpn 17.nr both, ~FM wM M~incWM[Wf'MfwAA W*iis l,. NOw«A or kwvo V rtl401W do'" In M. M AIMrrMMNI MYI MrtlrM♦iwMNNMb,wbhF nKwM brlho FAT. N7 ISM" A*MPNA, b MY Ch-W. AN Tank Oir4~pn, FAA I w I I~ Y Mrs 6,6" Yu ■rY r rh. pMyy~yr,i ~PMM wpr IM I»A inwMe. HMV OIAOY NOWN rMtpIMKM 10 G4,M k) +gw. ~wanrii MYIMMw IMMr Mti/MN N M r,M MWpn r.A dFYn 6oM oNP M ~+irY~cH~~r~Nrnu w r1YNr{YIrrMR fir, M„ila w r.0 Mt dCM brn,b IM rAA MeloAYl YrAep IrMMMr.MCAM apr YNY M wMd. Y IU rnr mw~rrr,rw«wraionr.r.~Nw ~OOfrt row Fw wrrwo Nwla~N,ulY, or UI An FAA r Prl0040 iYrw AYA U,M *.wwbn of w f M"!Y m. Wtip SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE - 0mmal Inetructloln 2 io) rc La' ENTS PART EASe'ENSUREAllENTRIESARE E~b~.ETHRO GHOUTUTMEFORM ETFARPART 17,THNIFORM ISY6TUPINTIMO N W SUlIMSSION "TRUCTIONS ARE CONTAINED AT THE TOP OF EACH PART, tWORMATION IN SECTION 1 {CONSTRUCTNm 1 011101011,10 FLKW A TI UDE& FOR ACCURATE CIUIRTMlO AND TO ADJUST. IF NECESSARY, OPERATIONAL PIIOCEpIIIIES AND I PART 1 TO REPORT ACTUAL START OF CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION ►ART T TO RErrWl7 AA STRUCTU. UC ~1; EACHIIfO ITS OpEATEST HE ONT ~ 1 ~ I TO REPORT A CONSTRUCTIONlPIIOJECT AGANDOIIEO Oil DIiMANT~ l~ l` (4), FAA Fo 74W2 f/dll9upEq,9i0Eb Pq[VlaUS EMli0µ ~}U.6.0.PAr I!!A-7f9-Q~I pro,!" I r 1 7 THE FF'E`( ~,RGIJF' FN~3E . ~l I10 I 'a S ALL.. . Ua D9P*#nen1 SOUthwasi Ro. ion U W l!1(NU(>(3f{(em A(Nans49, Lou maha, F0F1 ftrIh, TyanS 10193.0000 raft AVkr" n New Mexico 0xrahoma Atknlnkf m m Texas AERONAUTICAL STUDY NO. 91-ASW-2042.09 Notice of Extension Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation A Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation VMS ISSUed by the,Nederal Aviation Administration (FAA) on May It 19921 relative to the following construction proposal= Proponents Ray Hallford Height 449 Peet ACL Glen Lakes Tower 10049 feet ANSL 9400 N. Central, 11104 Dallas, Tx 75231 Structure= Antenna Tower Latitude 33°10'43" Location t Denton, Texas Longitudet 97°05'12" The proponent hoe requested an extension of the effective period of the determination. The FAA has reviewed the aeronautical study and current aeronautical operations in the tree of the proposed structure and finds that no significant aeronautical changes have occurred which would change the basis upon which the determination was made. Therefore, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the effective period of the Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation, issued 1n thin matter oa May 1, 1992, is hereby extended and will expire on May 11 1993, unless ' otherwise extended, revised, or terminated. This determination, issued in accordance with PAR Part 77, concerns the effect of this proposal on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and dose not relieve the sponsor of any compliance raspo•isibllities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, state, or local governmental body. 1$'U4 0'. 444 Bruce GO Beard Airspace Specialist System Management Branch Issued lint November 10, 1992 Atlendal4ern P&Z Minutes ATTACHMENT 3 NI a October 28, 1992 /D 4~1 WO Page 2 i Lombard Addition. Mr. Cooper stated a conflict of interest and left the meeting. STAFF REPORT; Mr. Yost stated that the 10.086£3 acre site is located on the north- northwest side of Mayhill Road, west of and adjacent to the MK&T Railroad tracks. The site is currently undeveloped. The proposed use is as a 449 foot communication tower, and an associated instrument building not exceeding 400 square feet. No public improvements are required to be built. The site uas annexed into the corporate limits of Denton in 1984 and simultaneously zoned Agriculture. There is a proposal to rezone the site General Retail (conditioned). Loop 288 will run through the site and land is being dedicated for that purpose, Mr, Engelbrecht asked why there are no public improvements required. Mr. Yost stated that no need for public improvements is being created, so they cannot be required. Mr. Bucek said that there is not going to be any accessory uses that will require water, sewer, etc. Therefore, it would be hard to require improvements that will not benefit the lot, RECOMMENDATION; Mr. Yost state that the Development Review Committee recommends approval. Russell Tinich, facilities manager at Andrew Corporation, stated that they are opposed to the rezoning. He submitted a letter opposing the rezoning. Mr. Engelbrecht explained that a public hearing on the rezoning would be held next. Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of the preliminary plat of the Lombard Addition. Motion was seconded by Ms. Huey and unanimously carried (4.0). IV. Hold a public hearing to consider making a recommendation on the condition General Retail zoning of 10,0868 acres allowing for a communication tower, located on the north-northwest side of Mayhill Road, west of and adjacent to the MK&LT Railroad tracks, Four notices were mailed to property owners within 200' of the site; one was received h i P&Z Minutes October 28, 1992 Page 3 back in opposition. Chairman Engelbrecht opened the public hearing. STAFF REPORT; Mr. Yost reported that the proposal is for a conditioned General Retail District with conditions. On the north and east is Agriculture zoning, Beyond r` the MK.&T right-of-way is undeveloped land owned by the Andrew Corporation, On the south is Agricultural zoning, The site has minimal frontage on Mayhill Road and a small sliver of Planned Development 91. Planned Development 91 also lies to the west and is undeveloped. The applicant is dedicating 120 feet of right-of-way for the proposer' Loop 288 in the platting process. The routing is in accordance with the City Master Plan. The site has only 9,89 feet of frontage onto Mayhill Road, not 30 feet as is required. However, the applicant received a variance on September 14, 1992, from the Citizens' Traffic Safety Support Commiwsion, allowing a 9.89 foot drive. No sidewalk will be required along the proposed Loop 288, This site will have access to a 12" water line on Mayhill Road. It does not have access to an existing sewer line; however, because of the proposed use, no water/wastewater service is warranted, The applicant is also dedicating a drainage easement. The proposal for a 449 foot communication tower in this location has been approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), The permit expires November 1, but the applicant says an extension has been granted, This site was annexed into the corporate limits of Denton in 1984. At the time, it was included in an Agricultural zoning district. Since that time, there has been no zoning activity on the land, Mr. Cochran asked if a tower could be put on the site if the zoning remained Agricultural. Mr. 'Yost said yes with a Specific Use Permit (SUP) and approved site plan, Mr. Robbins stated that the staff was concerned that Agricultural zoning with a SUP would create a non-conforming lot that does not conform to Agricultural zoning standards. The lot size and depth couldn't be met. A variance would have been required with the SUP zoning, Mr. Engelbrecht asked about getting another type of general retail use on the site. Mr. Yost said that a rezoning to change the conditions would be required involving the full zoning and notification process. The proposed conditioned zoning limits the use to a tower. i h I Avida ltw . ~ 'W /a yaU P&Z Minutes October 28, 1992 Page 4 Mr. not here. stated that t would have t to be built to counts provide frontage access to any though there is not w building road oad there. that was put on this site. Mr. Yost stated that drainage improvements would be required as well. the n se eral years on the zoning board in Flower Mound PETITIONER: help. Hempe staff for their p. r and is now the chairman of their Board of Adjustment. This site is effectively landlocked. They want to change the zoning from Agricultural to General Retail with only one use allowed. The height will be 449' withThe Federa.1 Communications The tower has been approved by the FAA. Commission (FCC) will approve the frequencies on the tower at a later date. The tower can be used for beepers, private channels, cellular plicnes, microwaves, etc. l Mr. Cochran asked when the tower will be built. Mr. Ramos said that construction will begin immediately after city approval, depending on the weather. IN FAVOR: none present. OPPOSED: Rus Tinich, plant manager of Andrew Corp., stated that they are in opposition to the rezoning. They intend to maintain a greenfield image around the plant. They have customers from around the world that comment on the plant 2nd its surroundings. The way it looks is important. This rezoning with the Lo The extension could create problems. The Loop will improve property values. on the in that The higher property / }ganef hvdl eS toencou werr sgremoving ed So hero businesses couldprocomperty, are concerned would ld be undc;sirabie such as beer and wine sales. That type of buses They undesirable to their plant entrance and to the City's plan for Loop Y are the also concerned abot the direction of the si s go over the top of her facilities, lit could interfere lw th lthejirr to t tower. If the Bnal facilities. The FCC requires path surveys. Mr. Cochran asked if such a concern should be expressed to the FCC during a public hearing. Mr. `i'inich replied that they have not been asked to comment but would gladly do AyondiNo. Ai endaltenL._ P&Z Minutes ~.~~O1v October 28, 1992 Page 5 so. Andrews is not required to have an FCC license but the signals from the tower would interfere and their current testing and testing that they plan to do in the future:. Mr. Engelbrecht asked how long Andrews has known about the proposed tower. Mr. Tinich said about a week. Mr. Engelbrecht asked if he had contacted staff. Mr. Tinich said that he wrote a letter and submitted it to the Planning Department. Mr. Engelbrecht asked if he has talked with the petitioner. Ms. Huey asked if the incoming signals are unpredictab,e. Mr. Tinich said that the amount is unpredictable, The direction of the signals is the concern. The tower picks up the calls and redirects them to their ultimate destination. Mr. Engelbrecht asked where the next closest tower is located, 4 Mr. Yost said the closest would be either the one on Woodrow Lane or in Shady Shores. Mr. Engelbrecht asked if Andrews manufactures antennas. Mr. Tinich said they manufacture towers, antenna, and related equipment. RECOMMENDATION: Mr, Yost stated that due to its adherence to all policies of the Denton Development Plan. (D'DP), the staff recommends approval of General Retail zoning conditioned on: 11 The creation of an 85 foot setback from the future right-of-way of hoop 288. 2. Limitation of the use of Lot 1, Block A, to a 449 foot communication tower and an accessory building not exceeding 400 square feet, 3. Designation of Lot 1, Block B, as an undevelopable tract of land in this configuration, 4 A4 eedaNo,._._ Ageedaliero_._Z~5 # l P&Z Minutes October 28, 1992 Page 6 Mr, Fngelbrecht asked if staff was aware of the signal direction problem. Mr. Cochran asked what other coning classifications would allow a tower without an SUP. Mr. Yost said that. General Retail is the least intense. A tower would also be permitted with industrial zoning, Mr. Robbins clarified tYrat a tower is permitted by right in General Retail, r , Light industrial, and I•}eavy industrial zoning. The proposed zoning Commercial I, conditions away all other uses. 1 ion, Andrews I RESUTT contacted the owner about selling Ijim a tower. tThey~arre'w lling to deed has even used by the property for construction of a tower only. The frequencl~~lems restrict the prop caused r ved by the FCC and the law requires that any p' tower must appro by the tower be cleared up immediately. The FCC can address any frequency problem. down discuss the Mr, Engelbrecht Mr.r ,nich. if Mr. amos He alt o asked µif the conditioned Gene al Ret ail zoning was project ct with Nf suggested by staff. Mr Ramos said yes, Chairman Ungelbrecht closed the public hearing. Mr, Cochran said that he would like to see FCC approval as a condition for the zoning. Chairman f;ngelbrecht reopened the public hearing, Mr, Pamos stated that the FCC does not permit towers. They permit rfrrcaglueinct~e tower, e get He asked lithe Commission a suggesting the frequencies prior to the building permit Mr. Engclbrecht said yes, Mr. Tioich said clarified that the FAA is concerned about the height of the tower and rr a 1 . O \ Agoida Na Agenda DAf) P&Z Minutes October 28, 1992 Page 7 the lighting on it. The FCC is concerned about the frequencies. Mr. Engelbrecht explained that the proposal is that there be a condition that FCC approval of the frequencies is required. He closed the public hearing. Mr. Robbins stated that Andrews appears to represent 23% of the landowners. Unless their opposition is withdrawn, it will take six votes of the Council to approve the petition. Mr. Cochran moved to recommend approval of Z-92.026 with the conditions proposed by staff and the condition that the FCC approve the frequencies to be used by the tower prior to issuance of a building permit. Motion was seconded by Mr. Glasscock. Mr. Engelbrecht stated that he is in favor of the motion. The greenfield image is offset because there are a lot of trees on this property. The railroad also serves as a buffer. The landscape ordinance is intended to help preserve greenspace. No other retail can be put on this property without further zoning. Further retail is not a goal of this rezoning. Ms. Huey said that this is one tract and may be an example of spot zoning. I I Mr. Robbins explained that spot zoning has to do with zoning that is out of context with outer uses and the DDP. This is in an urban center which is for intense uses. This use is not intense but one of these days, there will be other intense uses in the area and a tower will not be out of context. It is not out of context with the master plan. Motion to recommend approval of Z-92.026 carried unanimously (4.0). Mr. Cooper returned to the meeting. V. Consider recommending appointments to the Airport Zoning Commission. Mr. Engelbrecht stated that Mr. Glasscock is willing to serve, on the Airport Zoning Commission again. That is appropriate because; he has flying experience. Mr. Robbins explained that the purpose of the Airport Commission is to develop regulations that apply around the airport. I E:Aw0ocAord\fsbzon.o A~ endaNa.ATTACHMENT 4 ORDINANCE NO. _ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" TO GENERAL RETAIL-CONDITIONED (GR-C) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIG14ATI'ON FOR 10.087 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH-NORTHWEST SIDE OF MAYHILL ROAD, WEST OF AND ADJACENT TO THE M K & T RAILROAD TRACTS; PROVIDING FOR A PEN- ALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Denton Realty Advisors, Inc. has applied for a change in zoning for 10.087 acres of land from Agricultural "A" to General Retail-Conditioned (GR-C) zoning district classification and use designation; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 1992, the Planning and zoning Commission recommended approval of the requested change in zoning; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the change in zoning will be in compliance with the Denton Development Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the zoning district classification and use designation of the 10.087 acres of land described in nce b bt is attached to and incorporated into this by reference, changed from Lgricultural "A" to General Retail-Conditioned (GR-C) zoning district classification and use designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION II. That Exhibit B, attached to and incorporated into 1:L . this ordinance by reference, is approved as the Site Plan for the district in accordance with Article III of Chapter 35 of the Cade of ordinances. SECTION III. That. the district shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. An 85 feet setback from the future right-of-way of Loop 288 as shown on the site plan, 2. The use of Lot 1, Block A is limited to a 449 feet communication tower and an accessory building not exceeding 400 square feet, 3. Lot 1, Block B is designated as undevelopable in its present configuration, 4. Frequencies to be used on the Communication Tower are subject to the approval of the Federal Communications commission. pr~ 9 /Venda No. Agenda ltez S ~v SECTSON IV. That the City's official zoning map is amended to show thEj change in zoning district classification, I SECT_ ION__V, That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this tha day of 1992. BOA CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS To LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY h BY: c~ w~sJ PAGE 2 r T{ 7 Pgondaitnrrl__: YIZI) EXHIBIT A ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE DANIEL LOMBARD SURVEY ABSTRACT 784, CITY OF DENTON, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING PART OF A (CALLED) 10.087 ACRE TRACT AS DECRIBED IN A DEED FROM BOB CARAWAY TO AUBREY PRODUCTS, INC AND 1985, BOB CARAWAY, ON THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, I COUNTY, TEXA REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OFDENTONE VOLUME 1709, PAGE 526, BEGINNING L ROAD AND THE T WEST INTERSECTION RIGHT OF WAY F E NORTH M.K. WAY OF MAHIL T. RAILROAD, NORTH THENCE SES18 T389 SECONDS FEET TO WEST WITH THE AN IRON PIN; LINE OF MAYHILL ROAD A DISTANCE F 9 THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST WITH THE INE OF SAI OF 624. ANSOUTYH RONLPIN AT THEDSOUTHWEST10.87 SAIDA10.087 ACRE6TRACT; TO THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 1098.84 S EST RIGHT OF WAY OF THE M.'KD. E& T. RASAID 10 ILROAD;087 ACRE TRACT N THE THENCE WITH THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY AROUND A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 29 SECONDS, A RADIUS OF 1873.08 FEET, A CHORD OF SOUTH 32 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 21 SECONDS EAST 1131.42 FEET, AN ARC LENGTH OF 1149.37 FEET TO AN IRON PIN; THENCE SOUTH 14 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST WITH SAID OF LANDTO THE POINT OF 10.0869 F ACRES 138.54 RAILROAD RNTA NOF WAY A ING IN ALL DISTANCE BEGINNING CO ZONED -I")' SAM7ARY SEWER FASF.N£M' - VOL.i69<, 16, 180, ap. R, i N, III, \ 1 Apendaitem ~ APPROX i l{/;: ZONE A FIRM 480194 0020 `J v EXHIBIT B ` IAR'r SE•E N' rr AE A ZONED 30,, 't A 111 Cj' ~ ~ 1 S 75 6 pY \ N,N \ S1 0D N, NNX 4L W C CID zi \ \ \ \I lLJ i_w Q \ I s P' \ ~l, 1 V I 1 1 ~IN N 1 1 cr- i ~ \ . l1 1 •Q n ` 1 r 1 , m J \\ti 1 1 r O. A'WX SEO\ R IN X111 ~,1 i 10 W C \ \ `ti 1 M 1 , \ IN NN, o \ \ ` ' X37 ti 1 1 \ 14 O 1 1 Y 1 `1\ . ` ~o t 1 i }S,60'18 0, 930 U VF.Y 0 WI 4,~,1' \ \ 1. Co. s I( it l} r tJauEVI, f~f 4e ~ ~ ! ~ ! ~ . y ATTACHMI'N'r 5 AndrewCorporetfon 2701 MAY01 Road DREW ,TE TEL: (811) 76205 L: (8 (817)) 56 5662400 FAX: (817) 566.0695 2 December 1992~pp(~a4t0 G. Owen Yost f ASLA ~U ,L,/oI0 Urban Planner CITY OF DENTON SUBJECT: Proposed Rezoningf Mayhill Road Dear Mr. Yost: The intent of Andrew Corporation as documented in our°letters Of ~ 27 October and 28 October was to oppose the rezoning ositionSwere relatedntoaOur communications Road to prevent the erection r The main reasons for our Opp Ity and, secondly, maintain a green field image around he facoflthe Mayhill Road assure for the planned eltpmen, we were asked to meet intended buyer of the property. property. As a result the our with Mr. Ray Hallford., in a meeting with Mr. Hallford in November 1992 Thee discussed the discussion placement of an Andrew tower on the property. roper centered around the beneeXtlitydfor futureiantenna g loading, design for ice loadiand completeandabi project management. We also competitive pricing discussEd the positive impact an Andrew tower would have o mployees and the City of Denton. I left the Andrew customers, e that Mr. Hallford would award. the meeting with the understanding tower project to the lowest bidder. since that first meeting, there have been several conversations between Mr. Hallford and our Tower Product Line Manager, John Aso Kralik, related to the engineering p ins for t to have ant foot tower. must be rl.cing toathetsamevengineering " all tower fabricators pricing specifications, for example, if brand X is designed without ice loading and Andrew is designed with ice, brand X can be made much cheaper. trying to work out the we e this , e Therefngineeorrie, ng °detailstthat willrleadto actively the future saleiofrhese Andrew tower for the M we Roadremasitei.n in opposition. details can be resolved, Sincerely, u Russell F. finich Facilities Manager RFT:dp cc: Frank Robbins CITX COUNCIL O 1 i I ~ 1 I I I ~ it I ~ I I QO o ~ 00 A 41 C00: oppo . c a O~ oDpp~00p r ° H t e 0~~~ ~ 0~'aQ00044D~~ DATE: December 8, 1992 i CTTY COUNCIL REPORT f7 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Variance request (V-63) to Sec, 34-124, Para. f(3) of the Subdivision Regulations, pertaining to drainage requirements. The applicant is Schneider & Justice, Inc., on behalf of East Oaks Addition, Phase III, located generally east of Audra Lane, north of McKinney, and accessed by Timber Trail. t FiECOMMENbAT I: QIJ I The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval at its December 2, 1992 public hearing, by a vote of 5 to 0. S UMMARK : In order for the city Council to approve a variance, it must be demonstrated that all three criteria, as listed in Sec, 34-7 of the Subdivision Regulations, are met. The criteria, and the Planning and Zoning Commission's responses, follow: I 1. Granting the request would not violate any master plans as defined by Sec. 34-5 of the Subdivision Regulations. "Gr.antinc the variance would not violate an master l.ans since the master dxa_natce plan does not show specific _imnro~eme~r is to be installed in this area. " 2~ The special or peculiar conditions upon which the request is based relate to the topography, shape or other unique physical features of the property which are not generally common to other properties. "rhe pranert~' - is hysical~ unusua in ,ti.,.t the adjR1.ni.n subdivisions downstream of this development do not, have an underground._drainagesystem into which to t?-~. In addition. the tonograph,}~is so flat that in order to install underground drainage. it would have to be run south a11_ the way to McKinney St_, over 1/2 miles ZList to be able to drain out the end of the ni~~e." 1 a A~entl~ Ne, Agor~tla C~tt~ _ iaW- 2~- 3. The special or peculiar conditions upon_ which tYi~a~ request is based did not result from, or was not created by, the owner's or any prior owner's omission. "The above-referenced oh.Ysical Peature5 of the nros~ert were not caused by the ownex. or ank.Preyious owner." BACKGROUND: The requirement being reviewed, as it applies to the applicant, states that all drainage which can be carried in a 48-inch pipe at normal ground slope must be carried via underground conduit as opposed to open channel, based on a 10-year design storm. The applicant wishes to use a system of small concrete-lined channels to carry st-ormwater to appropriate points of discharge. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFEC'PED: Engineering and Transportation Department. FISCAL IMPACT' None. Respectfully :submitted: Prepared by: Lloyd V. Harrell 1.ity Manager G. Owen Yost, M3 ,A Urban Planner Approved: i 'rank 11. Robbins AICP Executive Director Planning and Development Attachments: 1. Location map. 2. Final plat. 3. Appli_cant's rationale. 4. Planning and Zoning commission minutes. AXX00252 PAGE 2 1 r ~ ~+-r• ~1 I ~I~• Y r \ I A ga daltem.~:~qq ~ ATTACIIMEN'i 1 {}.i!il.. ~o'~__;...✓Z NORTH East Oaks Addition Phase III `ems/L s..r 1. J - d S -~J r _•i j -7 >r Kum/" 't-~ ~ •.-G~~ s X ter, MKI Now- AVORA I o1K ^ARHJ 6 e -Y1tlt~L~~'l'/ s7r7f~J ~L~Vlll-ll l~'7,~-( ~a'-i_y il~5ltl t.~_ ~ E z LJ tl Sir ii t uIL~tJ o~( ryry ~°~S _i i. 'ImIj _ ----"3q Y IL I r--=~. SITE • WjI • 1 Date! 11/19192 Scale, NONE r ~h ArjondaNo AponOaltw ~ 'G . ATTACHMENT z 1~Ile P-92.035 ]East Oaks Addition = ID ~ N,r. wI1r5luY !)C ~ o rrB. r1KHFA d.2/t JP N .f 50, 75' ^ m b n n n m J T 1... ti. (1'... m O4 11 fl~ /,~,Ia t 20--j- 1. -1.}}} a. ` I r l ~)6 J L U ( 40 M -M ~e'a600 ~ ~rN~7CR C060 S 01' -_-r t : "Ib 6d 8 _ TIrA ! • K ~ ~M ~ _ ~U 00 s Se'00 uf. oo•~r• laf-oo~_. 1 ~ r _ r~ P m 18 toi•0e_oa r'. iJf.oo' 4 1 wCe'00• I 1 9 ~ a V m IS. I ~ Ig _ I 10.00 ~ • i m Y ~ of •on_0o~ I ~ 8 . ~ o _ 00 u..06T-_!_~_ 0.4 ,S f 0t Oo r I m o m c II !01'0 '00•Y O 'I ii s.ea' I 8~ ~ ~ toi •or do•. L 19 ' ~ti5%eo' g • l~r`t I v i i s n y L Ly• JJ Y E r_ I18 Il e' IaJli~. vmi, ~ I4 4 r i {J I kl+ W w ~ o a ~ @ 'I la 81 I' N 8 w, nw•i 9Wk i7f to -7+ 10.1 `y ir•0~' -x f OAR. al- I yLi oC€@ ")f. i0'_ U_._0 U.)0_L U.)0'_~N_ VLEY "Y i - sn o,n o oR y, w n ® ly 9y 8L Ca o 41 s 03.2 • za N 255 .e, o•~ n 11~^~C Quoit AICV 41117 INAL RRPLAT Dater 11/25/92 Scale: NONE V NORTH a ro of OCA a f01 1 f 1 ❑1111K JY Lfl gal( IISIMXI I ~1 ~J fASI UJk S' ef)UI 110,i NOS[ '~I '~--m (Irr p We•M CAI1114I H, PAGf, ?51 n•8•. oua.p I 1. e: a. r '1' f i.'tr ( v i - e s ~ I - N b3'7G'd"!" F II ~ C,j 100 ~ ,QI HIP 54'00" 408 0!' r e s 10 ,!2'O e+our r t I mr e 1 I >a tv rl Jo el oo . 61. ao a .oa• er oe ar, ct . J7. v. Db'33'.IB' to 14 f 346 20' I 8 86';13' 38• N II CIO 51, 4d• F. ~M I;II SS °R ° 8 g' JJ n•u' a w.va• E 1 t I x x x $ ) a E 6 / ° • S ?D A S 18 R ^ ° rJ.w Jf eo <a s 110,00'R xI. R ' c 8 1 D 6 x 15 3 13 x 12 .f ~ II ~ 01~ 9 z t 1 A II t77p _ - I3 R -rl• R 1! itC R iL P9 14 S a I , _ - e er_. + ~ 8 Lr • 8J ° I xl ' 1M:3,L )1 L A/ ( ~p .N ➢9 11,97_. Lr P9 f( I x nv. eo - 3 ii I+1 I ww' 10 ~ru. as.9a f TIMBER TRfIL p➢ t _ + I al x M'Ia 10 v I n V 1 r-ICGe A. faeam". H B u n r JI ee• o w x Le u w Ifl I 6q II1oM f Ll tF » 1 m 41 04 L 1. - Mao w oo• - _ R¢ I I N ' a o n u / . ' 7tr_'. v. oo rcoo ~p I 1 2 r7 nl . In 4 Y R~ I III o ~fi -~Git r' o 4P y'H Y SSA 9.r I4. x8 II SS 1 aR 13 ~S 14 °S Rp~ Ai< ~7 1 I~o t_ N Ic-r x 71 l.J n I6 A 17 18 6+i1 Ri Rl o LMaII~ Il 80'54'00" W ° a o r ~I a.ee• ~'+LO'8 n•w• I _~_J-11• I, _I eo me,-0 Q I ~4 I N. 14' A Ulll llr I;~ I aa• , t 1 tom' pM~ieii. 1~1 S t A-P Ppp?f Pi ILS, INC. Vlnlb x i+ Ns rt t VVV]]] y Jw ho bulldLiq Pe rmlt 'hell be tawM on Wye I.at 17, Hinck 'f- until Wk Valley Stla°t le aalanded end nanetrucled to the urolh. i O 1 N 1"'1 1 l a ~ m A r,. I 1 dr~ _+'I ~entiaNo.~ A endaRert ATTACHMENT 3 Nt0~/fd._.~'~ fl t v " a9-027G The rationale for requesting this variance from tho referenced article of the Subdivision and Land Development Rogulationa is as f.ollowns Varying from the ordinance requirements will not violate the roaster drainage plan. Thin property is physically unusual in that there is no downstream underground drainage system to tie into and the natural topography of the area is so flat that in order to install an underground system, an outfall swale would need to bo excavated almost all the way to McKinney Street, which in well. over one-half mile to the south. Also, this is obviously not a man made condition. I, . 1 1~~ r f . 1- ,ti ATTACHMENT 4 P&Z Minutes Decem Dec 1,011, ber 2, 1992 P1 Page 5 U the minimum requirements of the subdivision and Land Development Regulations, Chapter. 34 of the Code of ordinances. It was moved by Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Ms. Huey, and unanimously carried (5-0) to recommend approval of the preliminary plat for Lot 2, Block A, Exposition Mills and a Comprehensive Pedestrian Access Plan. V. Hold a public hearing to consider recommending a request for a variance from the Subdivision Regulations regarding drainage improvements in the proposed East Oaks Phase IV subdivision. STAFF REPORT: Mr.. Salmon presented the staff report (attached). Ms. Huey asked how f r the subdivision is from McKinney Street. Mr. Salmon replied that, McKinney Street is a little over one-half mile south of the proposed subdivision. The ground in this area is so flat that the water would have to run almost to McKinney Street before it would drain out the end of an underground pipe. The Development Review committee recommends approval. of this variance because all. applicable criteria are met and none or the adjoining subdivisions have underground drainage systems for this one to t i onto. Ms. Huey asked about the dispersion of the water onto other properties. Ms. Salmon said that there will only be a small amount of water. The proposed swale will be shallow and wide. The situation will not be too much different than if the water was left to run naturally. When the property to the south of this subdivision develops, they will tie onto the swa.le. The commission voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend approval of the request for a variance from the Subdivision Regulations regarding drainage improvements in the proposed East Oaks Phase IV subdivision. VI. Hold a public hearing and consider recommending the preliminary and final replats of the Offenbackcr Addition. Two notices were mailed to surrounding property owners; none J M Ag9I1~1♦ iV~„ ( ~ \ AgandaltoaL S ATTACHMENT TO TJIP: MINUTES E`:IIC lc T92 D CfTYofDENTQN, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTpN, TEXAS 76?_ 01 MEMORANDUM DATE] November 17, 1997. TOi Planning & Zoning Commission FROMi David salmon, :.:anlor civil Engineer SUBJECT: variance of underc,!:ound drainage at East oaks Addition -Ptaae III This application has been submitted by Larry Schnieder, owner of East Oaks Subdivision. The request is for a variance of Section 34-124 paragraph f-3 of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations which requires that all drainage which can be carried in a 48 inch pipe at normal ground slope must be carried in underground conduit as opposed to open channels based on a 10 year design storm. The applicant wishes to use a system of small concrete lined channels to convey storm water to appropriate points of discharge, in order for the Commission fo recommend a variance to the City Council, the applicant must demonstrate that all three criteria as set forth in Section 34-7 of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations are met. The three criterias are as followai 1. Granting the request would not violate any master plans as defined by section 34-5 of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. 2. The special or peculiar conditions upon which the request is based relate to the topography, shape, or other unique physical features of the property which are not generally common to other properties. 3. The special or peculiar conditions upon which the request is based did not result from or was not created by the owner's o: any prior owner's omission. The Development Review Committee recomms;nda approval .,f the variance as we feel that all three variance criteria are met, Granting the variance would not violate the master drainage plan as the master drainage plan does not show specific improvements to be installed in this area. The property is physically unusual .ln that the adjo.Uing subdivisions downstream of this development do not have underground drainage systems to tie into. The topography is so flat that in order to install underground drainage, it would have to be run south all the way to McKinney street (over 1/2 mile) just to be able to drain out the end of the pipe, These physical features of the property were not caused by the owner or any previous owner, I will be glad to answer any questions you may have at the December 2nd Planning and Zoning commission meeting. Davi Salmon AEE00IC7 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 t I T. i -ITT. Tw: CITY T COUNCIL i i ooo~~ooooaoq oo~oooD G ©O . ° ~Z:)- c TITS °ooooaacoo~~ . ~L 7 r Ag1Md+No. _ DATE: Dece:l)"I J7w.. ~ Rite CIS COUNCIL R'-'_ORT CLs/ei / / TO: Mayor and Members of the city Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager 1 SUBJECT: Z-92-029, Vintage Retirement Community RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7- 0, at their meeting of November 11, 1992. SSUMMARY: Rezone a 6.033 acre tract of land from the Planned Development District to the Office District on property located northwest of N. Bonnie Brae and W. Oak ,Street, also known as the Vintage Retirement Community. CKGRO FSee the Planning and Zoning Report. PRQGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Building Inspections. Planning and Development Department. F'ISM IMPACT: N/A Respectfully submitted: 4'-~Ct VI- Prepared by: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager tren K. eshari, Urban Planner Approved: Frank H. RA bins AICP Executive Director Planning and Development ANX00240 kenda No. Agenda lleni q Fate ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT NO. 69 TO OFFICE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 6.033 ACRES OF LAND KNOWN AS LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF THE DENTON RETIREMENT CENTER ADDITION; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOU14T OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Vintage Retirement Community, on behalf of CS Denton Partners, LTD, has applied for a change in zoning for 6.033 acres of land from Planned Development Zoning District No, 69 to office zoning district classification and use designation; and WHEREAS, on November 11, 1992, the Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval of the requested change in zoning; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the change in zoning will be in compliance with the Denton Development Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSt SECTION I. That the zoning district classification and use designation of the 6.033 acres of land described as Lot 1, Block 1 of the Denton Retirement Center Addition, is changed from Planned Development Zoning District No. 69 to office zoning district classification and use designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION II, That the City's official zoning map is amended to show the change in zoning district classification. SECTION III._ That any person violating any provis?.on of this ordinance Shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $2,000, r.~Lch day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall con:.citute a separate and distinct offense. SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992. 9OB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR 1 T Agenda liera_ ~S F Nto ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY By: I { f PAGE 2 A 2UMM ll that certain 6.077 said t POC8J1gLSX.T ip at0J acre tract of 1 said tract bein f,2eTLACT yo sofare of land situated county at Uento9 LTeT5 1 aid 2r BO;;0f ' Dal°nton CauntYr Texas in the metes and bounds xas, said tract being 11DDIfiION, in the ~itart of as follows= further described Y and tiECIN.JIN~; herein by B iron for the Northeast co ail pin at the Northeast orn+r et L4t41 being deaCiibed he shown by plat recorded in Volume 1 rein at Texas, in the W 2' 8~'nnia ezae Addition, as est tine of Bonnie Haag stre t at Records, Denton county, TIVCZ South 12 1 31 foot to an Iron pin 44 minutes 33 seconds last with said street liter of said Lot li pin set in the ground at eet angle point in~tbe rMENCL South 0 degrees la minutes S• East feet to 41V cut in concrete said walk t the last with Of said Bonnie Bras Additioni ith maid react 56, 0 corner of Lot 1, fe TH-ZNCZ et t south 0 deg a ee 06 minutes 15 seconds East with said road 1074 teat to an iron p tract shown in found in the q=oundJ by deed to Texas A i k U round it at the Southeast corner of shown by dead recorded in Volume 9220 Pa g Development Foundation, de County, Texas= 9 437; Dead Records, Denton rNENCE North 09 degrees 16 minutes O feu-,d at fence corner post) A West, 212.13 feet to an iron pin THENCE South 80 degrees Si minutes 14 seconds West, 161,46 iron pin found at fence eornarl teat to an 71MCE Nortb 69 degrees 42 shuto SS oconds West cut in concrete at the Southwst curer of said Texas 1.7 feet an "X4 Davolopment roundation tract, overall, a total distance of 473.41 feet t an iron pin found at the Southwest corner of N UnlvaraitY Jamaeba venture tact, as shown by tract shown b to Sod, Deed Records, Denton Count Y dead recorded in volume by deed to Y, Taxas~ 1239, page E)MIBIT "A" - CO?fI'INUID ON NEXT PAOt h ,Vjonda No, Apidaltem_jc. EIRIBIT uAn - CONT;ily~ THENCE North 0 degzeas 40 minutes 34 seconds West with fence 103,94 feet to fence corner post at the Southwest corner of tract shown by deed to Jameeba tract, as recorded in Volune 1043, Page 7391 Dead Racords, Denton County, Taxes; nce tv UnCZINrorth 01 setrinsth54 e ground at 23 the seconds Southwest vcorner of 2Bl09, feet Mad-Tex Subdivision; TffENCE South fag degrees 40 minutes 39 seconds East with fence $20,72 feet to fence cornerpost at t.je Southeast corner of said Block "A", Mad-Tex Subdivision; r" THzNct south is degrees 57 minutes 02 seconds East, 301.61 feat to the POINT or BEGINNING. NOW PLArrED Us I.ot 1, Block 10 DZUT01f RtTtlIEJQNT ORWIR, an Addition to the City of Winton, Texas, accordinq to the Plat thereof recorded in Cabinet Fags 275, Plat Records, Denton County, Texas) t athar with certificate of correction filed :i4na 10, 1910, recorded in volume 1904, Page 182, official Public Records of Real Property, Denton County, Texas. 1 4 ~ I AGendaNo,.- ~ Ape1d,11,M .'eS. rf PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT Tot Mayor and Members of the city council case No.s Z-92-029 Meeting Dates 12/08/92 GENERAL INFORMATION i Applicants Vintage Retirement Community 205 N. Bonnie Brae Denton, TX 76201 (Charles Holbrook) Current Owners CS Denton Partners, LTD 17103 Preston Rd,, Ste, 200 Dallas, TX 75298 Requested Actions Rezone the property from the Planned Development district (No. 69) to the office district, Location and Sizes A 6,033 acre tract of land located northwest of the intersection of N. Bonnie Brae and West Oak Street, 205 N. Bonnie Brae, also known as the Vintage Retirement Community. Surrounding Land Use and Zonings North - HCA Hcspitalt Office South - MF-21 Apartment East - SF-7J Residontial West - MF-1f Vacant Denton Development Plans Moderate Activity center a AwdaNo, (Case Z-92-029) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportations The rezoning of the property from the Planned Development district to the office district will have no effect on the streets as all improvements necessary were installed with the rw original development. Utilities$ Waters There is a 16" water line on Bonnie Brae and a 121' water line on site. Sewers There is a all sanitary sewer line to the west and to the south of this site. Fires Existing fire hydrants on site are adequate for this tract. Drainages The rezoning of the property will have no effect on the drainage as all improvements necessary were installed with the original development. HISTORY on March 13, 1984, the City Council approved the rezoning of this tract of land from Multi-family and Office districts to the Planned Development district, An approved site plan (ordinance 84-27) shows a retirement center comprised of a seven (7) story multi- family housing complex for retired people and a 60 unit personal care facility, h AgoRdaNo,u Aaondaitam - - - - (Case Z-92-029) page Three HISTORY (Continued) The adjacent property, the site of HCA hospital, was recently rezoned from the Planned Development district to the Office district as well. on November 111 1992, the Planning and zoning commission held a public hearing on Z-92-o29 and unanimously recommended approval (7- 0). ANALYSIS This property is located in a Moderate Activity Center which xed according the Denton Development existing useP of tenc heopropertyiwas uses of moderate intensity. he detail of Planned Deve built in accordance licr,nt is trequesti g thel change of zoning inoorder No. 69. The he ap app area, to amend the ex property in add a temporary storage aanallyzingnth but existing site plan. changes district, the allocated trips swill in yplace zoned office this ararea is e already already use occur. Nursing homes as well as retirement centers are an allowed use in the office district, The proposed request does not violate policies of the DDP. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-92-029. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2, Detailed Plan for PD 69 and ordinance 84~11, 1992. (draft) 3, Minutes of Planning and zoning, - r AMOOFFE qqMpi Agenda No.. ATTACHMENT 1 AgundaItent Z-92-029 Denton Retirement Center NORTH LOW as --kn o+ 11 ' • ~ -'ate _ ,as•u dodo ~ ' y'. r ~,i ~''"J ! `~~^•••~~1~..'__ _C1 X91-- ~F~~~~-'i SIDE Y~ At !lrJm{ PIN ~ iL~.~~. Dater 10/30/92 Scala NONE Agenda No. ltom .~J.._.... Agenda ATTAC11MEMI 2 r f f i ' 141 ! . ',11,17 A L~I 11 I j ~ J f~ . L WWI p ;g :I~I ! ,I I I' I • rll , i 1 I'i , 1 , T • 1 .Y I L,,rl _ • _ flu, 1 1 ~ nwYrn..~ ~ . 1~ 1 I I I I I Ffl tf.l l`I'l ~ ; . I l -~I 7 k , J(((1! I (I, JI IJI 1 Ir I i ' 1 . r ~ ~til v ~ I ' , ;'~1 is ~'6 ~~U i ~~f,lll~lti~ l`~~I ~ ~,Irll 1, Ud ~ • • ' llr! II tSa ,j1.! yll ll l~11~J'e. , ' .1\Il- ; J I e C=~th + ; 1 i I~{r' i r I I~ l: e2tY..rZ~, , .l ; it ~~.1 _~LI LLI ~I LI L~ l.f.l.!. I R i ~:~t'1 F~a7r'crrrnT~~ r 1i \ 1 I 0:11,11ll'i]~ ff IJ41J_I_ILLI_f11 , •dlq pMl.. P+d..~ r rre i/tw d r w,}` ;~.~I lili~114pLL~.. I'< F '~'~•h lwrP IY+ ~ti= _`.i. I r..,•h:. _ j;, ~~ir~ CCC~ r~Eil7 I I ~ 1 :1I~N. I! , hl i~.l ~ S4 . 1! 1 b$1.~1Ci Mi III i U H H E Araonda f o. NO. ~ _ - 1 ~ , AN ORDINANCE AMEND NO THE ZONING MAP Of SHE CITY OFOfDN, TNCES FXASOF AS SAME 'WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE ORDINA THE CITY of DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE N0. 69.1, AND AS SA[D HAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 6.033 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE EUGENE DENTON COU PARTICSULARL YDESCRIBED HEREIN; AND 96,DECLAR NO ANI F,F CTS E; DATE,NORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTLOI2 L. The Zoning Classification and Use designocLon of the follovtng described property, to-wit; • All that certain 6.033 acre tract or parcel of land situated in the Eugene Puchalskl Survey, Abstract No. 996, Denton County, further Denton ~tTaxis ndsaLd Btr clt beingAddition Lnxthi City en dg Countya oC being described herein by motes and bounds as Lllows: BEGINNING for the northeast corner of the tract being described 1, plac bras Addition asoshoin by plot coVrolnerumof,,Lot 2, Bonnie Records, Denton County, Texas in the want time oC Bonnie Brae ' street; THE south iron pin set to the ground sat Angles Volnttinethe eastlkine. oe 3ALE Lot L; " ea " cu Concreaos dswelk'at theetSoutheasticorner 56f.6Lo8t I otosaid Bonnie Brie Addition; THENCE south 0°06'15" east with said road 103.98 feet to jr, Iron pin Eound in the ground; at the southeast corner of tract shown by deed to Texu h@ & M Umiwreity Development Foundation as shown by daed recorded in volume 932, Page 431, good Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE north 890L6'08' vest 213.13 feet to an Leon pin found at Eonoe corner post; THENCE south 89°58'16" wait 161.48 feet to an Iron pin found at Eenes corner; corner woft saidl Texast pn cut in theNCsouthwest 9° ner Foundation tract, overall, a total distance of 47.;.41, feet to An iron pin found it the southwest corner of tract shove by deed to Pa 14 548,reDead Records of shown Coby died unty,, Texasrded to Volume 1239, THENCE north 0°40'34" wait with fence 103.84 East to fence corner poet at the southwest corner of tract shown by deed to Jameaba tract as recorded in VoWill L043, Page 739, Dead Records of Denton County, Texas; sn• THENCE north 01°54'23" want with fence 209,15 Eait to an Leon pIn set in the ground it the southwest cornet of Block A, `IsMax subdivision; to fe postCatsthehsoutheastlcornorvofhlaidcBloc2k A2 Mad T e. Subdlvioiomet Z•16WBILLY R. JONES/PAGE 1 I I. ~andaNn . , Agondallein#5~F THENCE south 88°57'02" east 30166 East to the point of beginning. is hereby changed from Multi-Family (MP-1), Office "0" and Planned Development (PD for office use) District Classiflettion vie to Planned Dew lopment "PD" District Classification and Use under the Comprehanaive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas with the following conditions and specifications: 1. Curb cut locatton and number of curb cuts is not approved as shown on the planned development site plan; final location and number shall be determined dueing the building permit stage; 2. Total number of residential and personal care units landscaping, screening and height of structure shalt -:onform to approved planned development site Plan and artist rendition; 3. Applicable City of Canton subdivision regulations, lend development codes and ocher building permit requirements and standards shall be observed unless expressly waived as part of the approved planned development ordinance. * The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the lath d,-v of January, 1469, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of chk :ity of Denton, Taxis, under Ordinance No. 69-1, be, and Lha same, is hereby amended to show such change in District Ciessifiaa. tion and Use subJact to the above conditions and specifications, SECTION II. That the CLty CounCLl of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the ppurpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for Ma character of the district and for Its peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with o view to conaervinp the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the CLty of Denton, Texas, and its Citizens, SECTION III. That this ordinance shall be In full force and affect immediately after Its issage and approval, Cho reired public hearings having hereto fore been hold by the Planningqu and Zoning 10mmiaeion and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after giving due notice thereof, PASSED AND APPROVED this the L^'Zf day of March, 1984, , a z;r ATTEST: I OP D TON, lEW i It i I%/ CRE'CAIY CITY OF DENTON, TV-Us APPROVED AS TO LECAL FORM; C. J, TAYLOR, JP„ CITY ATTORNEY CITY of DE'ITON, MUS , BYi i I 2.1635/BILLY R. JONES/PACE 2 ;r~-~~ 1 kontla No. P&Z Mlnules ATTACHMENT 3 AClenda item 1' ) November ll, age 7 1992 i>tle__- r, l III. "101d a public hearing and consider rcronin , Development 68 to the Agricultural Distri a 77. acre tract ()I, Fh4 2181 ctbon property 1()cated o~nttherasP side of appro,eirttcrtely one-half mile north of Ryan Road, e Notices were mailed to six property ()~vncrs witltlrt X00 feet received in favor of the petition and none in opposition, ` ; ()nc reply form wrrs Staff Report, Ms. heshat'i prestntexi the staff report (attached), ~ Petitioner, Bud Johnson ()f Corinth stated that he intends to Put in a ])()rite anti live there onto purchased the propert Y YeArs raising cattle, Y and No ()rte was present to speak in favor or in opposition to the petition, Reconunendr1tior1e Ivfs. heshari stated that staff recommends approval of Z-92-02 8, 1 Charrmeut Isrtgelbreeht cl()sed file public )jearil1g, Mr Glasscock rttovcd to recorttnicnd approval of Z•92.028, by Mr. Cochran anti carried arnartirnously } - Mollon was seconded I IV, HOW I public hearing llevoloptncrt 69 to ,,,(o consider rerotun 6 , 16, 033acre tract Office District on property of land from Planned locnteci at the northwest of West Oak e: ,d I3orutic Brae, known as the Vintage Retircntcttt Center, t.orner 17 noticcs were mailed to property ()whets wit}rLt 200 ; 1 was returned in petition and none in opp()sitlon, I favor of the I` staff Report; Ivls heshari preseiticd the staff report atta ( cl)ul), PCIltioncr: 1), Mr, Charles Holbrook stetted That the new owners of the Vinta e w ve a storage building, like to ha e site is now roved Plemnad Dcvclo become necessary to change tine Zoning o order to get the storeshc, The NOW g own would y aro comrttitled to improving the facility and are redoing the Interior, it 'Ctrey will Mr. Cochran asked hots long the tcrrlporary storage wotrki be in ~1acc, Mr. Holbrook said that they tivorrld need it for 12.2 1 1 nwnths during construction„ 1' Agenda lien-Z4,5 P&Z Minutes ATT11CIIMENT 3 DdIB._...1 ;a~~!~ November 11, 1912 Page 7 111. Hold a public hearing and consider rezoning a 77.6 acre tract of land from Planned Development 68 to the Agricultural District on property located on the east side of FM 2181 approximately one-half mile north of Ryan Road, Notices were mailed to six property owners within 200 feet; one reply form was received in favor of the petition and none in opposition, Staff Report; Ms..Feshari presented the staff report (attached), Petitioner, Bud Johnson of Corinth stated that he purchased the property and j intends to put in a home and live there ninny years raising cattle, 1 No one was present to speak in favor or in opposition to the petition, Recommendation; Ms. Feshnd stated that staff recommends approval of Z-92.028, Chairman Engeibrecht closed the public liearing. Mr, Glasscock moved to recommend approval of Z-92.025, Motion was seconded , by Mr, Cochran and carried rtnanlmously (7.4 IV, Hold as public hearing to Consider rezoning a6, 033acre tract of land from Planned Development 69 to the Office District on property located dt the northwest corner of West Oak and Bonnie Brae, known as the Vintage Retirement Center, ~Etiilla4'' 17 notlecs were mailed to property owners within 200'; 1 was returned in favor of the petition and none iu opposition, Staff Report; Ms. I"esharl presented the staff report (attached), t Petitioner; Mr. Charles Holbrook stated that the new owners of late Vintage would 1 like to have a storage building. The site Is now zoned Piatuted Development so It became necessary to change the zoning in order to get the storage, The new owners are committed to improving the facility and are redoing ilia interior, They will atttenipt to be good neighbors, Mr. Cochran asked how long the temporary storage would he in place, 1 Mt, Holbrook said Ihat they would need it for 12-24 months during construction, AgendaItern.~. E. L-- P&Z Minutes Ntn -/c'? November 11, 1992 Page 8 Later on they will probably need permanent storage. Ms. Huey asked if the storage structures would be temporary. Mr. Holbrook said that at this point they are storing equipment such as beds while they are gutting the first floor. There will be a new kitchen, dining room and freezer. As these changes are made they will probably need a more permanent type of storage but there is vacant land in the back. Mr. Cochran asked why the rezoning is necessary. Ms. Feshari said that originally the storage was not planned for the reconstruction, It was for the storage of beds as needed, The ordinance requires that when floor area is added to a Planned Development that the site plan be amended. Staff is recommending this zoning change so they will not have to keep amending the site plan. Mr. Holbrook said that the facility was owned by the RTC. When they bought the facility, they discovered that materials were being stored in the open weather. They calve up with the temporary storage idea, They are now discovering that they will ~ need permanent storage. They aren't sure how much they will need yet. Staff suggested that they rezone. The permanent storage will be compatible with the existing masonry, ( No one was present to speak in favor or in opposition to the request, Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of Z-92-029, Chairman Engelbrecht closed the public hearing. It was moved by Ms. Huey, seconded by Mr. Willis, and unanimously carried (7.0) to recommend approval of Z-92.029. V. Consider recommending appointments to the Airport Zoning Commission. Mr. Engelbrecht stated that at the last meeting, Mr. Glasscock and Mr. Cooper agreed to be on the Airport Zoning Commission. dust prior to this meeting, Mr. Willis agreed to serve as well. r/ :CITY =JT COUNCIL I v°o~ O G ,p . OaoDOOO~O ~ N t 4 000° Lil r ooaa acaooo JT- +aa- DATE: December 81 1~ 9)2 Ap pdaNe. ~ f CITY COUNCIL REPORT AgendalteIM.f' ~J T0: Mayor and members of the city council FROM. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager EXPOSITION MILLS AND SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY NSIVE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS A, PLAN RECOMMENDATION: The Planninc, and zoning commission recommends approval. This is a 1,609 acre tract of land located 00 on the as south of of Interstate 35-North, approximately 2 Loop 288. The site is currently undeveloped, however, a request for approval of a detailed plan for a restaurant and private club is being processed concurrently. The public improvement to be built is a 12 inch water line along the located in the frontage 20 foot nutilityreasement along the frontage of the property. The preliminary plat shows an s inch sanitary sewer line proposed across the entire lot, this sewer line will not serve this lot but in the event the property to the north of this site develops as two lots, the 8 inch line would serve the front lot. The proposed line will be built to City specifications but will be private property. Mainte- nance of this line will be the responsibility of the developer until such time the developer grants an easement to the City. The plat document does not show any public sidewalks, however, a approved with the property to Pedestrian s south of the site and the access path is planned on the east side of the private drive along the eastern property line. B CK ROUND: This property edW7 on zoned July 16, 1991eVe]Thisn is the district second detailed within the PD located directly district. south The Denton of this site, outlet stores All services and facilities, including water, sanitary sewer, electrical, and solid waste are available for this site. 7 Agenr}aNa., .-&°.a. poAndalt8M ei5- The preliminary plat conforms to the minimum requireme°nt`~ j of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations= chapter 34 of the code of ordinances. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location map. 2. Reduced preliminary plat. 3. Alternative Access Plan Summary. P OG S. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED! Building Inspections. Planning and Development Department. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A I Respectfully submitted: Ayd C Prepared byr (L1 ar rell + f City Manager i ~,GLk~ h A ( , K en K. eshari Approved: Xran' H. Robbins AICP Executive Director Planning and Development exxooz4F P&Z Minutes DRP Dec ecember 2, 1992 Page 4 f f Ms. Feshari said yes. It will be a concrete sidewalk. The access plan can be reviewed with detailed plans. Ms. Huey asked if the roads will be curbed and guttered. Ms. Feshari said yes, Mr. Robbins noted that there is also a private sidewalk on the detailed plan. PETITIONER: Don Dillard, representative of Hunt Petroleum, r 5000 Thanksgiving Tower, Dallas, stated that he is available to answer questions, Good Eats restaurant will compliment the outlet center and will be of similar architectural style. The area between the outlet center and the restaurant is sloped. It will be landscaped after the restaurant is built. They are trying to change the slope so that it will be easier to maintain. They are doing a lot of landscaping at the outlet center. The pedestrian access will be continued to sites as they develop. There will be sidewalks throughout the site. It was moved by Mr. Cochran, seconded by Mr. Glasscock, and unanimously carried (5-0) to approve Z-92-027, IV. Consider a preliminary plat for Lot 2 Block A Mills and a Comprehensive Pedestrian Access Plan. Exposition STAFF REPORT: Ms, Feshari reported that the site is currently undeveloped, however, a request for approval of a detailed plan for a restaurant and private club is being processed concurrently. The only public improvements to be built are a 1211 water line and a fire hydrant wh.tch is to be located in the 20 foot utility easement along the frontage of the property. Tile preliminary plat shows an 811 sanitary sewer line proposed across the entire lot, This sec,Fer line will not serve this lot but in the event the property to the north of this site develops as two lots, the 8" line would serve the front lot. The proposed line will be built to city specifications but Maintenance of this line will bel theere pronvsibilityoofrthe developer until the developer, grants an easement to the City. The plat document does not show any public sidewalks, however, a Comprehensive Pedestrian Access plan was approved with the property to the south of the site and the access ath ann the eastern pr pertyhline. Thedprelimthe inary plat along Y plat conforms to T` 7 kondaNo ApcndaIIon P&Z Minutes 1 December 2, 1992 Page 5 the minimum requirements of the subdivision and Land Development Regulations; Chapter 34 of the code e Ordinances. Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Ms. Huey, and It was moved by unanimously carried (5-0) to recommend approval of the preliminary plat for Lot 2, Block A, Exposition Mills and a Comprehensive Pedestrian Access Plan. I V. Hold a public hearing to consider recommending a request for a variance from the Subdivision Regulations regarding drainage improvements in the proposed East Oaks Phase IV subdivision. STAFF REPORT: Mr. Salmon presented the staff report (attached). Ms. Huey asked how far the subdivision is from McKinney Street. Mr. Salmon replied that McKinney Street is a little over one-half mile south of the proposed subdivision. The ground in thi area is almoststo McKinney oStreet before it would would out the end flat that the water of an undergrnund pipe. The Development Review Committee recommends approval of this variance because all applicable none of the d criteria are met and underground drainage systems for this ion stodtie sonto,have Me, Huey asked about the dispersion of the water onto other properties. Me, Salmon said that there will only be a small amount of water. The proposed Swale will be shallow and wide. The water situation will not be too much different than if the south was left to run naturally. When the property of this subdivision develops, they will tie onto the Swale. The Commission voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend approval of the request for a variance from the Subdivision Regulations regarding drainage improvements in the proposed East Oaks Phase IV subdivision. Vi. Hold a public hearing and consider recommending the preliminary and final replats of the Offenbacker Addition. Two notices were mailed to surrounding property owners; none 1ooodaNo._._J~q_ Good Eats Cafe ATTACHMENT NORTH f ~ ~ I W ^UD b J .w r ' \ It ~11 1t I N 19 ,1 r ~ ql i 1 Ft~ ~ ~ it Date; 11/24/92 Scale; NONE 1 inni • _A'T`TACHMENT 2 - .l +VV pp - ws WTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35 E~~d l?I~•~__ - ~ ~ ..',u- :!y I~I III' I. [I ~ r 1 1 I ~ , c = [i j r ~ v r _ra (y III ~'VI -f-- 1 71 gl_-_ _t iI N.I li k -u 0 1 I~ I[1I < - r, I ~ 1 na I 11 4` :ti N urn 7 y_~♦. rw. L I f cDL I ~ G \ ~ r 5 v, r ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ o° s"• 'I ~ O x D o 0 n r r :9 -s nI I °z I! !11 N 3 0 N V l1~ 0 n t 4 n in L N 4 4 r-- o N u + j } I Si y1 1(° i Ii ° rl °@ (~1j 11'i (}qtr t1i ~9°1~ I S it ~S('1 ~ 3 1~j~ i i i1,~~ i t~~~ r° Ill( 1 ► ~t ~J1r14~`i~~~l a I~ ~a' ~ ~i 3~ ~(1~ ~ ~ ~ aJrt ~ r(~1 s ~ f ~ Ij+sM1~I 1J3~ ~ f' r' rr ~E ~t(( 1~:rt I 1 14 ~,~I 1 a( r I, ~rlt irll ` (Ili ~ ~ r~~~ ;1 ~~11► 1 L1 I 1 1 ~ 1 r ° rr rlll{ t r r tl r 1 1 4 1 ; it 7C a (11~ ~ I~Jy ' ~(11t {T 111', 1i I 1, r fl 1 51, 1 1fit Ef{t 1!t ~ i 1 ~ i d r ~1~t131~~~~Tl ~ t ( ~ ~ di( Ilt E d ~i! ~I d (itf 9 ~ ~f ~ ~r f 1~1~ I -r------- ~ 1 y1 4 !p) 4N( NI`I w dl NNUI N l !k 1 NF u I ~ 1 rdrnLlsoilx.I `I 11 1 Nq l1d IFx'J IM1 r al l JO l(B ((1 Ist Gl j 1 ur«o ~ J01 4 5 Isotl rvoi ULVL PaVJ M WIYW aY o LVW LNaY 111111 x )Vk R7 NOlr1}a 0 D'q l I IM~wo NI X i N N PEA J 401 Y, 1 ' O 011 I )x015 UV ul aq Ioul Iselsloossy pue ujoH_,(e1w1N +aWan; 3avm NvI11VN LV~d 1.}lVNAJ-13dd n 11 allu c;;_;1 apsy :IWI~1 r.n ~~IN.~wI ? t , 1 _ x~ J 7 Q t! J ~ oLull Io wyN;l ~ I 1L. .:;...~,».II.q.L~~,yI ~ Sl'lu'r ra0615odx3 'I na (ai~'i1++i Nq HIa❑M~ aid.: In rlr.nn:~41Y~~:v:l 1. V NJO lF7 I ICj.r I 1 I I I NV11 W LIU ~a IJ• IN a:\V 1 rJ ILI,» : .1. II _ 111 YaY r\ 1 1 I Cl~l~ti.J ht 41. `!•~d 1 q.. MWrWNN11. MIN 1/ 1 ~ \ I 1/I r. rM M..M Y1w.I.y.,11_f.Irs. 1• ` 1 Ifl -I/ - }I 1 I.. xlelN rl al r.r41,Y+~IU 1V 11q;.11 NM\N.I.HI~.n.H F1Mh '1 1 _ _ Y~[_I{( _ _~.I. I 16^V { Mnryun \r+. wr .ulN Nr 1.-N 14! _ ~~--yyll ' l4{t"Fj IVM.arIH 1 ~ 411 _ h I'1 » Ir/ Iw lyYl llw n N 4 ylY Y11 TI11.r. M M 1yN 4 _ 111 II1 1 I t ~ 1 7 02] d"8 aGua yumlon ~ of - 1: M ' NINA pYrm 1 U - I Plu q Y1,1 0 alt 'ShX 31 10 '"11111 IIOIII Gd% I I I 1 1 VJ •Y HNal Nlv rnw _ w - 1~ III rlt>I36 i(j 10 1 Yru 1NNIW.lq w11 41 NNVIIaNw NI~UI IYMI+IN NN'al II'i 1•KII YEN / ! Ir Nq N 111\IINNnI M H I.YNa N N M4+I. N Iw W.w wf IL N1,. H N II M N w•1 sn N N 11M V`IN'•I rl -I•R,PIZ Yr11111wIN II W1•,N I !f _ Y' IT N4YI ` N rN+Nar.N Iw 111q NdL•V rI Mwlpq 1 _ _ IN 1 IlOd 1 Ilrl M1In14 /I 1~ -1 \ L _ ~ I u/ 11 IN Y I M11 ( S 1 T1 ' 13NA I iY _ W 11wN. I 9q ~ I ~ I { 1 1 G Nl~fi - p •il 0 N_+E I H -~1 Fy 1 1111 I I FI g 1 I ri nNl1 tlllN Nn lOgl ).'+++G :fN- ~ i;ll i II I ~ N I' 1 Ilf~ 1 a 1 11 (Ali. IM I Y y U Yrl 'YI N My N IY.VI t 1 I 1 w119 H I V N NNYYI N w1MIW M/+ 1N•o11YY/ 11 N W W NIIN Ig11k. S /q .w grNW IY»I 1w Iw N rINMN1 N Iy+N I.Nw NINM. C 4 1'1a.Nd NN..W.gIF1IpMHWN. 4w ~11~W. ..Iw\-+, ~ ''11 ,,II cJ.IY ( ah0tl •crf aluno •.I~NwNlwlra lq wllWN MW,111 u. .IM NMI IYy NIIV 1 ~ VH CrV IVM1 J4 I n unnu 1 1 WIq MI NY/NN NYM Isy~rIq •»y.p N. ♦Ml 17 1 1 N.Ir)MI.W NIINWIY'IMN. MI( 4 N~ IM NNE\My1c. Nl 'Q✓ ^ 114"J1w 1JQ1 I.Y,A ,:111 , I,:)~ OII',r'r,l~ N InN IrMrI M NrrN V41r.I 4 NO 1rN YMV Ma V N ~NM1•.w^. I I 1 NYIN VN4 NI wl NNI N NI FIw IMu.Nj 1 NM INY1> 4 11a..r\N4 N N NI M vqq N 1a•.YN N NrM II w• •M 1w1 • W W I~1 N M IIV `INI.wM'IYIY~ nIYl Y11M41N.#IYnu yN 1 1 IY W.N Y.I IrrIWrN aN MW rN NrN W1111rW N ~~NN ~ "1' SIy11111 It1111 M 1 .•+1 wW N I M • NN yN rN1ui1 Iwi 1N'NI AIWgN U\I.NaIN hINN~WI~INr NNYg1~ ( I 1 N4an.1 T1 N ya1 hlq •N a. I N Iw AIwN 4Nu y r. NIt ouq ICI 1 1 iMl Cula It Nu4J I IPN N LIN ~ 1' ~ 1 \NS 10111.1+1 NI _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ F I .`l1. IA OnYYJl1 AIW M4NN If IPM W11N Yw Wa NNq Y.\1hW - ~ ~ ~ 1,11IINn 1 1 YM gNYI MI II I.w1 MFa r1 W 111 MM ,I 4 H II IM.1+1 Nw1MNgN..ar4WMpU1 NIM IM VN I(M Yy l. NY 4YItV1 Il waj INN rl~roa u Np N wNNL M N N NM N1/ Y N.r. 4 N1•+~ u OvVOU ROv~ViN "OUJ / . W»IMNIH Nn wrNN N✓I 4:.I N Iy FNI WI FIKq YR IrW 1171 71V:15 wi ~ilwie "i/,. I m am 0 "-N-% mw I 'INa14:. rq Wl1fg1 4W anNY hrI IYVN tul .MRN Y•11LN OO7 d0O'~ 1 t/N NN.1q law' N I1 . NwVr.Y `y,Wlr n1Y01 IY 1 YI IN•wl 001 m 0 U OS R OZ i .N•w1 ,VIIN U\ NNINgNYN NIIrN1N4W1.11.1'IR Ia>u 1/ (MI qli YINN(IW 11gM If[Y {I IN.NI \ .l 1 III•N lY H MNI• N~NNyIH ~ ~Y /NM~.I1I (My"~Ig1IM 1Y N ~YM~LrpM,WtI) _ I tw11NW M N~11 / V111WL iM~1111MNN 111MIY lI iNA N1 \ `-~_I Ci aw11a A V11M1'1NI N I+Mr 4.1 NY WY4 H N IN Y+1 N. N IN) •.1 '1 YI1'W HI I NNI a N •+I N N M Yr11 N NN W.IN1 I %1YLq ~ 1 W111NN P uwill { R y R 1 fM N q \ N ew NNYI~Ih I.ly rr R. y,I.YlYwy /MiN. YI y ? l ~ ~l M• y.r 4~Yw .Y Y1 Ih n W y . ~'~..~yi Iw ~ I ~r, N ~NM,iyM . ry.n \ M. WI + I.'x.lr Iw. lll W i),Mj pM.rlW lII IOWrwM Jnl wrNyr p W i~N 1+ .V. .1 ~,p I. LOOP 288 SJ 75 0 SO 100 :~.:Il:. 111l:«lo HMO' SraC .♦e ry, M wr w4 Ia v Ml FROrvrnc!: . h. ROAD F Mx[r, pll l'6r1, f1Y n. ~ Vnry,Y Nn..wytNMU. Nr ' rr r..,u a u.N N L!, bilrr, oal, rY nll rl ewln cop IriN (Ntc 1, ° r ^<-< ww IY1~ I + ....rw•Irr:wXx.~.Ih rrar X.+~i-w M+Ir wwp..n W.W I ~ NNN.1'[ U INw..M _ _ _ MI .NYw w. I ; ~i ~~r _ ••N'~~ilX SY r.Y /n y, ylw111111rwgIV bMIn MU 4.1 1 / I P.O.C_ J nu fX.l YNN N~~`~ IYIW Irr r.a. Ylti h 11 w Fwy, rl YI wY.,4M , II I I ~ r~r.':rr, Nwtll Nl1 Vr 1N :.Mtr'~r~.i`YrNlryri iw I J RANCHO v, rA 1 X11 dwx.'.Sy'~n:.i ~"'aw'Y `•"'^h' • » ~+«.I.'.p I I L.u,. I Of MCNr CO. w:rua«~1«i w. . wnr rr.lw~ I.r.n•._ VOluntn c (r r u .I r,"h."X" ti: wi:..llNi~,`Of»n: ,`up i st 2G9_I. Nqn nG., R. P. R.D.r,,r, t'w L f N, _ - yyN r..tH r.nM yy, 1y I I I •Nw 1.1 M~,•w+w„1 N.NtipM ✓I MI 11>yW~~YM rfn MA~ N I ! 'rl I I } nN W K,H MIN lI . ,Nlw w~ r,r,YN„ w ryhMM « w, rC I I 'n ~J~ 1..1 V0.~^v Myr.y lNrN _ .IN_~___ y-1 1 I ~•~~Y~ I Irl' •0.- IVJ/P\p1S(r .1~Y- •~___'~.~Irl I I L I Ir _Il / IIII ~-n- \\I 1 I \ \ ` ~ •IS ~I i~ t• IN N 1111.1 as sR J 450 .35• HC <ni Vilvi,l • t R I rY lr, r.n I i•x~:ll wN ,1 M»r wNwV ..a 1 Io.f X, 1 MMyI wI I I/ 1lMM M• Y p.. 4M N I N M /jr 1 __r y~ ~ Ill ~ ..a nnl 1 Iln I ( Y P ~ / 1 _ r11 I ~.yNY N rM w bl MW 'rll✓M M1.I^Arw wN.l M'.~I lsw rliwl yJ I I I I. COI 41 MI,M IW qY y. LMT. i Ul Y W N 4 iwl i f BLOCK ID UI I Hill r w } } I I f / 1 _ / F'xPQ 11J7O A11LL$ o! 1C%A$,-jrpp ~I rn w I!i)e rr:H F" I y' I ❑ / VOINr1iC u n N RI I 1 J._ ~ IrI..11 _V., I51+`JN I 1 t0.VNP0V111 I I~ IN _ re ~ F2 P JZp l I Ir f / 'N+N~w, iY~~r.rT'.'5--~. N.N , N N w nlr •..I l u.,ir N l~r 1 4 t<) ,9 nl1 , ) r11 may 1, -1a [.Y~lil wro9 yj±~ w,/.,t, rYR wlrr v r~l V rr, I,YII Yr yyl µ I I `C ' iA tl1 - o I N 1 M NMNw rI I) Fl • w p( J1 ~ N .r. r _ 1.11 6 m_ 1 YURwN 9T ~ S~Irf ~l ZI e J x,. M1.9 NIX$1! i i 1 If) r I _ NI .rN 1 +Ir wrN.X I / f?LOCK A 1 ulMa .,y9•.Nr y.ry.,Nlw N. I,Y Y» ,rnnr,p„W.MI U~~jI1l41Y IrY1.. YIr NII. 4 1 LXRO$11101'4 MILL`i „ra R.,L»I , .I r, Yr.rf a. wi.".f.'N».li ~ ' ) I.yiny VMMIYM'a Win Wlr. r,.N i I ~ I.n61nc1 P<7?0 P.R O_G f 1 hMe 1450 Oil, II-97 rh.., r.r'wMr rµ •.r. HiN XN N 0 o99a~«I ny /•ll ELIA4lNARY FL.Ai' Imo+nu wont sula~r, r•I 0i~ tY_~I++ - V44 - I rr~, I'~ Anr;1 Arl tin IJ00 Kfmley•Horn and-Assoalatoe, Inc, CJ Cr tt41 hl LOT G BLOGK A UEN R)N UI:R loll ry)UIJIV, r! xn; J+91NNW 6 JMMrNJ1 r ~RrkWrlMlld CIIIpMrlf~ Lot AOl 4pfolbil vv / 1♦ 0 I lorel b, g1g12 EXPOSITION Nlln 114tp ra'1 9a5 f. Sidle kln - MILLS r xr+os, norJ I. n rllr. KlmleW _ YN J or 1 r 1 ATTACHMENT 3 ~elldti~Vt)._ d Agenda Item-eeS **4,6 ALTERNATE PEDESTRIAN PLAN Exposirioe Mills of Texas, %nc. An alternate pedestrian plan for Denton Factory Stores was approved which created an intern:,! north- south sidewalk system through the property from Westgate Drive to the north boundary of the, site, This sidewalk was constructed in lieu of a sidewalk along the 111-35 frontage road, The intent is to extend this public pedestrian facility northward along the east edge of the access drive to Loop 288. Pedestrian crossings of the access drive may be provided at appropriate locations to serve the steeds of developments west o; the access drive. r~ I' i!I '~T,iir;Wlilfnul91'N V 1 J,J 1 I CITY COUNCIL o~oooooooooF o o ~d00w o t, o 0 ti E - OOO°~ t n M t ~ + MD~OO - °0aaunnaanna°oo pAendl Np, . / DATE: COUNCILY, R CITE the city council Mayor and Members of T0: City Manager OF, Lloyd v• Harrell, BLOCK A AND LOT BLOCK B, ~ FROM LOT l SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF rklIF, D. LOMBARD ADDITION recommended approval at its RRE OrIMENDATI~~? Zoning Commissio 0 vote. The Planning and and meeting by a 4 to October 28, r` 5 L"ARYs on the north 1992 th_northwest side 10.0868 acre tract is lnd d adjacent to The Mayhill Road, west of. an posed use is as a tracks. The pro instrument currently undevelop and an associated realize The site is tower, feet. In order to will be Beet communication 400 square existing trees xceeding of the e city to removeeplant building not less than 100 Cr the proposed this proposal e, licant has invited the fans, removed. The app building p With any trees that conf112t6S. need of Loop be built, since no right-of~way required to the proposed proposal as defined with ht-of-way No public improvements are ri-g Master created by this prop lirant is dedih~t Denton s is conditions' The app aligned easement on zoning future Loop 288` as a drainage for the plan, and is dedicating Thoroughfare of the site. the northern end limits of Denton in BACKGR- nUND: into the corporate A proposal The site was annexed zoned Agriculture (A) (G Cc)) is to General Retail-cond l tonight, 1984 andthemsiteeto G City Council rezone to be reviewed by trie a ing systems scheduled is to facilitate tpraCking and 2- of the tower automobile The Purpose telephones, (nbeepers"), cellular is available. However, the way radio communication. or rvice w, solid waste and electrical set° utilize atder that the proposal City water not propose lack nee applicant does due the sanitary sewer services Creates. a I 1 Ag0ndaItdntt~s$ ....~~.M of rJ The preliminary plat conforms to the minimum require en oof the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations; Chapter 34 of the Code of Ordinances. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Engineering and Transportation Department. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Respec ully submitted: r ~lo d V. Harrell Prepared by: City Manager V G. Owen Yost, ASLA Urban Planner Approved: Frank 411obbbins AICP Executive Director Planning and Development Attachments: I 1. location map. 2. reduced preliminary plat. AXXOD253 PAGE 2 Agenda lirrn-~--,-~s ATTACHMENT 1 Oute P-92-029 Lombard Addition j NORTH ~ \ gyp, ~ I ~ r!I L SITE f; Nl,4 I \ bate; H/30/92 Scale: NONE ~andaNe.., A'rTACtjMFNT 2 AgondaIIom,/00L rt~ta _~a- NORTH P-92-029 Lombard Addition ZONED \ \ A C::I:fvC ' 9Y e9: ;e N.1i. IFS 1 \ r APPROX. :ONE A FIRM 190194 0020 0 j I.2gFe R ZONED A 1 l i 1 ~b m A ~I V A ""S r,VPico rOKw - ~0. J r ~ ~ ~1 ~ I I V to rln: eir ~R~w. t38,5 \ \ l A V 37 \ \ 11.1 b ? 38,54' 4 ~'S,80'18 % eo- 1 1 u \ 9.8T ~y1 PRELIMINARY PLAT Date: 11/30/92 Scale: NONE . ~ ` - ~ -.tea, ~ _ _ T ~~_1' i '~y i~orulaNo,_E ~ Agaiidaltemt MINUTES-~~ Planning and Zoning Commission October 28, 1992 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas, was held on Wednesday, October 28, 1992, at 5;00 p.m. Present; Mike Cochran, Richard Cooper, Jim Engelbrecht, Ivan Glasscock, and Mary Evelyn Huey Absent; Melvin Willis and Katie Flemming Present from Staff; Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning and Development; Harry Persaud, Senior Planner; Steve Scese, Urban Planner; Mike Bucek, Assistant City Attorney; Owen Yost, Urban Planner; Gerald Cosgrove, Water/Wastewater; David Salmon, Engineering; and Olivia Carson, Secretary Chairman Engelbrecht called the meeting to order. 1. October 14, 1992 Minutes Mr. Cochran stated that the next to fast paragraph on page 13 should read that "there seems to be a loop hole for larger signs" rather than a "loop hold". He also pointed out some typographical errors on pages 14 and 15. i Motion was made by Ms. Huey, seconded by Mr. Cochran and unanimously carried (5.0) to approve the minutes of the October 14, 1992 meeting as corrected. 11. Consider approving the final plat of Lot 1, Block A, Carroll Park Place 11, STAFF REVORT; Mr. Yost reported that the site is located on the east side of Carroll Blvd., directly south of. Maple Street, abutting Pacific Street. One curb cut is proposed on Maple Street; none on Carroll or Pacific, In place of dedicating right- of-way, a five foot easement adjacent to the existing right-of-way is being dedicated. The site is zoned Planned Development No. 143 which will be unchanged by this plat The site is proposed for an office building. Currently, the land is undeveloped. RECOMMENDATION; Mr. Yost stated that the Development Review Committee recommends approval, now that the preliminary plat and accompanying variance has been approved by the City Connell. It was moved by Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Mr, Cooper, and unanimously carried (5.0) to approve the final plat of Lot I, Block A, Carroll Park Place II, 1I1. Consider the preliminary plat of Lot 1, Block A, and Lot 1, Block B of the D. T P&Z Minutes October 28, 1992 Page 2 Lombard Addition. Mr. Cooper stated a conflict of interest and left the meeting. STAFF REPORT; Mr. Yost stated that the 10.0868 acre site is located on the north- northwest side of Mayhill Road, west of and adjacent to the MK&T Railroad tracks. The site is currently undeveloped. The proposed use is as a 449 foot communication tower, and an associated instrument building not exceeding 400 square feet. No 'r public improvements are required to be built. The site was annexed into the corporate limits of Denton in 1984 and simultaneously zoned Agriculture. There is for that ptu~pose. Loop 288 will run proposal ite rezone and landeis site bGeneral etail through the Mr. Engelbrecht asked why there are no public improvem°nts required. Mr. Yost stated that no need for public improvements is being created, so they cannot be required. Mr. Bucek said that there is not going to be any accessory uses that will require water, sewer, etc. Therefore, it would be hard to require improvements that will not benefit the lot. RECOMMENDATION- Mr. Yost state that the Development Review Committee recommends approval. ..3,..Russell Tinich, facilities manager at Andrew Corporation, stated that they are opposed to the rezoning. He submitted a letter opposing the rezoning. Mr. Engelbrecht explained that a public hearing on the rezoning would be held next. lat Mr. GlaMotion was seconded by approval and unanimouslypcar iedh(410)rnbard Addition. IV. Hold a public hearin to ail zoning of 10,0868 acres al! wing for an communication tower,ol nditionated General t on the north-northwest side of Mayhil! Road, west of and adjacent to the MK& . Railroad tracks. Four notices were mailed to property owners within 200' of the site; one was received h ITT. COUNCIL 27- - t- XIMM: ITT: TZT: - 'T T, - T: T o~°°oop6O Of a Qo `ti po o to o° IT_ b 0 40OOD~~~ ~ a Y ~ ~ooO~O aaaaaooooo IF I XT: X': T ALL0001F ABndaNO..~l~, Agenda ltem 6 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PROVID- EXPENDITURE S OF EQUIPMENT, E THEREFORE;; AND PROVIDING P FOR IAN ING FOR PURCHASE EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated com- petitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the ma- terials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted herein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: i SECTION I. That the numbered items in the following numbered bids for materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid Proposals" attached herto, are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids for such items: BID ITEM NUMBER NO VENDOR $13,80U.00 31359 ALL XEROX 00 31360 AGT, XEROX $ $ 16,,536536..00 712 31361 ALI, XEROX $ 3,816.00 31395 ALL XEROX SECTION II. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of rees the persons submitting the bids for such 1etsem or and agi es in purchase the materials, equipment, sPPl accordance with the terms, specifications, standards, quantities and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid proposals, and related documents, } y AjentlaNo....__ Agenda lfom.c~~ SECTION III. That should the City and persons submitting ap- proved and accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions, spec- ifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained in the Bid Proposal and related documents herein approved and accepted. SECTION TV. That by the acceptance and approval of the above r numbered items of the submitted bids, the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective imme- diately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: DATE: DECEMBER 89 19992 CI'T'Y COUNCIL REPORT MpndaNo.__~e Agendall©nt!e~ . TO: Mayor and Mombers of the City Council 8 FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: XEROX PURCHASE ORDERS #31359, 31360, 31361 AND 31395 RECOMMENDATION: Council approve purchase orders for rental of copiers to replace existing lease machines located in various city offices, See Exhibit "A" for details regarding monthly pricing, models, locations, etc. SUMMARY: The rental agreements on the existing machines are clue to expire December 31, 1992. r* The State of Texas rental program pricing includes the costs of all supplies excluding paper and staples (if applicable). The new rentals will be procossed through the Cooperative Purchasing Program of the State of Texas and will have effective dates of January 1, 1993 through August 31, 1993. The City of Denton Council passed Resolution No. R92-019 on April 7th, 1992 authorizing participation in purchasing programs of the State Purchasing and General Services Commission. law the useof a state satisfies contract. The Lcal ing competitive bids for states itthat a local 'm through govnent requit BACKGROUND: Purchase Orders #31359, 31360, 31361, and 31395, Exhibit "A"• PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTP OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Purchasing (Central Stores Division) and Police Department. i'I5C'AL IMPACT: 04The 3 058n2t18509naa and n"L ase 1)Copie s" Account o#100-070 0040 P002- 9141 las approved In the 193 FY budget. W our annual payments l are decreased byt $6916100 plus the cost of suppliesc converting from (i.(', tonler, developer, etc,). Respee illy submitted: *od ~11 City Manager Prepared by: Name: M lane f1. Harden Title: Buyer !)proved: Name: Tom D. Shaw Title: Purchasing Agent `f LJ~.. 9 Agondak Agenda ZZLI Council Agenda 1218/92 Copier Hentale Exhibit "A" New Tcent Locale ReLaes Avg. P.O. # Medal (Xerox) (Current) (Xerox) 1090 $17251mo City Hall 1090 $20241mo 31355 Basement 5034 $ 192/MO City flail 1038* $ 1761mc 31360 Accounting 5065 $ 839/MO Svc. Gtr. 1065** $ 971Imo f. 31361 Utilities 1050*** $ 5801mo 31395 5052 $ 47711,10 Police *The 1038 model is no longer In production. The 5034 would be the replacement model suitable for this location. **The 5065 copier has replaced the 1065 model. ***The 5052, copier has replaced the 1050 model. MONTHLY SUPPLY COSTS ON THE RENTED COPIERS ARU ED ONUTHE STATE OF TE){AS CURRENT CONTRACT INTO THE AVERAGE COSTS, HOWRVER, THEY ARE INC PRI_._ CING. ADEPDA. 311 .~.i' 11115 IS A W I Y Of Ut/V I uU, I L-XAb CONFIRMING ORDER XX PURCHASE ORDER NO: F C 1 (IF MARKED) Tais number must nppear on all DO NOT DUPLICATE invoices, delivery slips, cases, mns, boxes, packing slips ,11x1 bills. Recl IJa Bid Na Dale: 1 1 E C S c Page No. U 1 VENDOR PURCHASING DIVISION 1901.8 TEXAS STREET-7 DENTDN, TEXAS76201 NAME/ ) E R C X 817,19877100 DIFW AIFTRU 8 17/267 004 2 FAX 817/.482 ?692 GE36 ALSTIN CTF BLVD A5U4 CCNFIFMAIiCN 11 816 ADDRESS DELIVERY City of Denton (Basement/City Hall) AG€TIN TX 7E721 ADDRESS 215 E McKirney St DEi 7X 782111 LISA SCWELL VENDOR NO. XER45001 DELIVERY QUOTED 0.1 tit S.: FOB DESTINATICN TERMS • Oct 80004 MC VENCOR CA~o 0 N / A MFG NAME 10725.004 12 080000ti CITY # 93927 STATE CP TEXAS RENTAL CONTRACT CLASS 7I3-A1 JANUARY Is 1593 THROUGH AUGUST :10 1SS3 EROX 1U50 NCLUDES ALL SUPFLIES EXCEPT PAPER s STAPLES INCLUDES 1000001 CCPJESIM.LNTH 000402 - 2540uU0 AT $.003E EACH 50.001+ CCFIES $.0,759 EACF /C FUR INSTALLATI CN CF REMOVAL OF 11I N 1 (v,1 l r1~T` ~ 1 1 `rr,^V v) Q\ FACE 7LIAL : 1208OLOCL CL 714) 843 U98E GFAIxC TCTAL : 1308Ca*0L £505 13,£80.80 VENDOR INSTRIICfIONS: 3 Teens NCI no lu,,wss on-envl,e spacowd ) I Swxl Odginat lnvoles with duplicate ropy. d- &hipping Inslnrelions: F.0.B Declination prepaid Iwiessnuwrmsv %wawo 2. Bill to - Accounts Payahlu 5, No Iederal or stale sales lax shatl he included 215 F:. McKinney St. in prices billed - Denton, TX 76201 Purchasing Division h I IIS IS A (A) I W L/LIY f lJlY, f L'AA .3 CONFIRMING ORDER xx _ PURCHASE ORDER NO, FC 21360 (IF MARKED) This nenitm must aPnetnr on all DO NOT DUPLICATE nvoices, delivery slips, cases, clos, boxes, packing Slips aixl hills. Req No Bic] No: - Dato: 1 1 20 9 2 Page No. i IL R PURCHA SING DIVISION/101.6 TEXASSTREEVIOENFON, rEXAS76201 DAME/ X.E R C X 8171383-MO O/FIVMf FRO 8171267 0042 rAX 8 1 773 62 4 6 92 1ODRESS 6E36 AUSTIN CTF ELVD ill DELIVERY CCNFIRMA71rh rnLY (16 ADDRESS City of Donton Accounting AUSTIN TX 7E721 2i5 E McKinney St DEMON. 1X 76201 LISA SChELL VENDOR NO. XER450UI DELIVERY QUO] ED 01 01 93 FOR CEET INATICN TERMS del 89001 MC VENDCR CAT9 A N / A MFG NAME 192,000 19$3E.OC CITY A 93927 STATE OF TEXAS RENIAL CONTRACT CLASS 71Z-Al APUARY 39 1993 IHROUGE, AUCUST 319 iSS2 ERCX SU?,4 NCLUDES ALL SUPPLIES EXCEPT PAPER INCLUDES E9001 CCPIES/MCNTH CCITICNAL CCPIES Al x901 EACH /C FCN INSTALLATION OR REMOVAL OF 1038 % ca 7( 1 1 PAGE TC TAL : 1 a 3 .GG GRANC TGTAL 195~E.G1 Ol 710 1)43 0582 E809 1953e.00 VENAQR INSR7u0TIONS: 3. Terms - Net 30 tOnk~ss oiwm6o spmilievf I 1. StnkJ original Involco with duplicate copy. 6. Shipping Instructions: f.0.S. Destfnalloo prepod Iuoka"oii cpwtsu sr:odin~nl 2. Bill to - Acmil is Payabro 5. No federal or stale sales lax shall bu included 215E tk:Kinney SI. in prices billed Purchtcsing Division Denton, TX 76201 I 11-118 IS A w r r U1 47LIV 1 vlu, I LAIAO CONFIRMING, ORDER (If= MARKED) YX ID ORDER DO NOT DUPLICATE. This ❑urnher niusl appear on on NO: all F C invoices, delivery slips, cases, fieq Nu Bid IJo: inns, boxes, packing slips and billy A- Date: 1 1 20 5 2 Page No. J 3 ALI E R CX PUl7C1GISING01VISlONi901-8TEXAS S1RE T10FNTON,TEXAS 76201 )DnDREESS 6114i3b AUSTI N Cyr, BLVD 13J R17<787'100 0/r"'AlETR0 81 7/261 0042 FAX817/3824r02 )L All DELIVERY CCNFIHMATrro, Fv,v C16 TX 7E7~1 ADDH118S CiLY Of Denton Service Center LISA SCyIiL 901 A Texts St DEN70f~4' TX 74201 VENDOR NO. XER45O01 DELIVERY QUOTED 01 01 9 f09 O£S1INA7ICN TERMS 001 8.00 MC VENCOR CAT. i CI1y 0 93927 N A MFG 14AME STATE GF TEXAS RENTAL CONTRACT CLASS 713-A1 839•JGu 6.712 •C AFUAAY 1. 1493 THROUGH AUGUST 314' 1S5y kEFCX 5CLUD£045 S ALL. SUPFLIES EXCEPT PAPER 6 STAPLES FCLUDES 60.001 COPIES/MONTH G4'00P. - 1009000 AT =•01117: EACH 004' 0014 CCPIES AT 4.0094 EACH /C FOR INSTALLATION CA REMOVAL OF 104e tta N Pl y ~ Q of 710 PAGE IGTAL U4,: U582 Li F)U9 GFATC 00 IC 7AL S 6.712 OV 44''73?.• 'ENDOR INSTHUCT10N5r - - Serxi original Invo4co wilh rlr plicale copy, 3 Terms - Nel ;101u eel _sr, llnrw _iso _ 5j-w _d I - Bill to - Accounts Payal.lo A, Shipping fnsiructiotm F.06 Deslinalion prepaid lunless nlr,erwise snecuredl 216 E. McKinney SI. 61. No ledaral Of dale sales lax shall ha included Danlon, TX 76201 in prices hilted. Purchashlg Divlsioi, - I I 1.1 1 Y ur Utl u 1 V1u, 1 CXEIJ TIiIS IS A CONFIRMING ORDER XXX PURCHASE ORDER NO: FC "c f-495 This number must appear on all (IF MARKED) invoices, delivery slips, cases, DO NOT DUPLICATE stns, boxes, pecking slips and bills. Re4 No: Bid No: Date: 11 2 0 S 2 Page No. 0 1 \ PWICHASING 01V1S1ON / 9018 TEXAS STREET I DFNWN, TEXAS 76201 lENDOR X E R C X 817/383-7100 01FW W TRO 8 17/26 7 0042 FAX 8 1 113 82 4 6 92 4AME/ 6E30 AUSTIN GTF BLVD k3L'J CCNFIFMATICN ONLY C00 1DDRESS DELIVERY FELICE DEFT. AUSTIN TX 7E7-11 ADDRESS 221 No, eLly DENTONs TEXAS 7f2U1 LISA SCMELL VENDORNO. XER45001 DELIVERY QUOTED 01 101 53 FOB DESTINATICN TERMS 001 8*00U MC VENCGR CAre a N / A NFG NAME 477.000 3s818s4J CITY N 53927 STATE OF TEXAS RENTAL CONTRACT CLASS 713-A1 JANUARY 1r 1993 711-1RElUGh AUGUST 21t 1SSt XEFGX 5D82 INCLUDES ALL SUPPLIES EXCEPT PAPER S STAPLES INCLUDES 20x001 COPIES/MC 2ZO0112 - Ebasa(1a AT 3.00175 EACH fasa0l + CCFIES A7 Ss04G 4 EACh h /t FOR INSTALLATICN OR FENOVAL OF 1050 a CL ~ m o i a~ FAG2 TCIAL ; 'relfsGU FAND TCTAL 3r816.GK a1 10:1 071 3040 P002 5141 ~sE1f.0U ~ I VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS: 3 Terms - Not 30 (Ureessotherwiso sfe fled 1. Sand original invoice with dupliealo copy. 4. Shipping Inslrucliorr.r `A B. Destinolion propo;d Wnlcss omerwise spedried) ` 092. Bi:l to - Accounts Payable b. No federal or stalo sales lax shall be Included 215 E. McKinney St, in prices billed Purchasing Division Denton, TX 76201 CITY COUNCIL I 1 l I I I 1 ~~ppp0 oar o ~~OGO A Off'{ o d d ~F y OO . ~p~ ,tiro H t e~'~OJO ~OO~oa~oocoo°°°o i Agenda V Agenda Item ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated com- petitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements in accordance with the procedures of state law and city ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has receiv- ed and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works or im- provements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and plans and specifications therein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 2. That the following competitive bids f:,r the con- struction of public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invitations", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City's Purchasing Agent filed according to the bid number assigned hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as be- ing the lowest responsible bids: BID NUMBQ CONTRACTOR AMOUNT 1429 FLOYD SMITH $96,500.00 SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the bid for construction of such public works or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such person shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice to Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notification of the award of the bid, SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all necessary written contracts for the performance of the construction of the public works or improvements in accordance with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and Bid Propos- als, and document., relating thereto specifying the terms, condi- Pyy 7 quantities and speci- ec ificatiens, standards, tions, plans and l therein. sums contained and approval o£ the above Pied tance for the public ~ That upon acpep of contracts ere- ouncil here- execution herein, the City council the SE-CT-1-ON and the authorized and in contracts competit~.Ve rovements as funds in the manner works and imp eXpenditure of authorized by authorizes the such approved bids and amount as spec ifie thereto. im- ursuant shall become effective executed pursuant ordinance SEc ION:, That this approval, assage and 1992. mediately upon its p of PROVED this the day PASSED AND AP BOB CA5TLEBERRY, MAYOR CITY SECRETARY h ATTEST: Y,TER5, JENNIFER WA i BY:_ <s FORM APPROVED As TO LEGAL DEBRA A. DRAYAVITCB, CITY ATTORNEY BY 3 6X[do 140 ,.1992 thlo ---_-._CITY COUNCIL REPORT "71 lP U TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1429 - CDBG SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM a RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder, Floyd Smith in the total amount of $96,500.00. SUMMARY: This bid is for all materials and labor to repair approximately 9000 linear feet of sidewalks in various areas of Denton. (Please see attached Memorandum from Jerry Clark, February 26, 1992). BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet, Memorandum Barbara Ross November 20, 1992. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Community Development and the Citizens of Denton Utilizing these aroa,. FISCAL IMPACT: Community Development Block Grant Funds Sidewalk Repair Program account # 219-057-CD76-8502, Balance of account $105,499.66. XR,espe,c lly submitte Harrell ager Prepared by. Name: Denise Ilarpool Title: Senior Buyer Approved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent agenda.311 i ~y 7 AraendaMID ~ ~yL 1429 I FLOYD GLENN 1 BID # { LAC~RY MANNING I SMITH I CDBG SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM BID NAME NOVEMBER 12 r 1992 OPEN DATE VENDOR I l^',_~^i N QU~AIJTITY ~CRIPTION $98,750.00 , $96,500.00 TOTAL AMOUNT , I 1 I ' I YES i II i BOND YES II , i r 1 Qr~entla(Vo, ~ Agontlaltem_ ~s BID ~ 1429 f f f f lug ~ ~ BID NAME CDBG SIDEWALK REPA:1' PROGRAM f LARRY MANNING f FLOYD GLENN f f SMITH OPEN DATE NOVEMBER 12, 1992 f f 8 fQUANTITYf DESCRIPTION f VENDOR f VENDOR f ' f _ f f f f f f f f f f f TOTAL AMOUNT f $980750.00 f $96,500.00 f I I BOND YES f YES f ~ I I ~ I I f f ~ I I f f I i I i i99? N11 ?3 f'''~ t4~1 Community Development Office 105Vt West Hickory Street Denton, Texas 76201.41 15 (817) 383.7726 CITY of DENTON, TEXAS _ MEMORANDUM r DATE: November 20, 1992 TOt Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent FROM: Barbara Ross, Community Development Administrator SUBJECT: Community Sidewalks/Bid #1429 Based on the recommendation of David Salmon, the Community Smith'sd bid Fof y$96,n500 was Deloment the Communityf Sidewalk would prlike to oject. accept low bid on the project. Please schedule the bid for City Council approval as soon as possible. Call me at extension 7235 if you have any questions or ,ne@d additional inforwation. Thank you. Barbara Ross David Salmon, Senior Civil Engineer xc.. "Dedicated io Ouality Service" ApandaND,_.__~a d3 Agenda Itarn,._S-'~` ll _ CITY of DENTOA;, TEXAS MUNICIPAL. BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM DATEi February 26, 1992 TO: Barbara Rose, Community Development Coordinator FROMi Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering & Transportation SUBJECTr Sidewalk Repair Coat Estimates - Priority List Quadrant M1 Bryan - oak to Scripture Normal - Oak to Scripture 1,056 LF 1,640 LF 2,696 LF 2,696 LF = 1,198 SY Quadrant 02 Frame - Mingo to Grove Vine - Grove to Texas 300 LF Fowler - Peach to Forrest 890 LF Palmer - Peach to Forrest 408 LF _488 LF 2,086 LF 2,086 LF = 927 BY Quadrant 03 Prairie - Bernard to Avo A Jacqueline - Parvin to Willowwood 150 LF Westwood - Parvin to Willowwood 60 2 LF Locust - Eagle to Mulberry 60 LF Stroud - Carroll to Elm 528 LF 1 OiFi6 LF 1,994 LF 11994 LF = 886 SY Quadrant #4 Robertson - Bell to Jackson Wainwright - Sycamore to Prairie 45 LF Oak - Austin to Bell 685 LF Industrial - Hickory to Bell 808 LF Alegra Vista - Dallad Dr to End 405 LF 212 LF 2,155 Li 2,155 LF 958 SY AEEOOODC P 4 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 r f. CITYf COUNCII TTT I: 17 i - r + 1 I - - n1l ppOp~A~a °a~ oDOp O ~ b oa 6,w- DDOOooo N t UooOpOJa 41 0 aao aaa 'Y G Agenda Item ZI 1_r ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR PURCHASES OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WHICH ARE AVAILABLE FROM ONLY ONE SOURCE IN ,CCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PUR- CHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING AN EF- FECTIVE LATE, WHEREAS, Section 252.022 of the Local Government Code provides that procurement of items that are only available from one source, ne sou including: items that are onlyo enable natural monopoe because of patents, copyrights, secret presses water and other utility manuscripts or books; electricity, gas, purchases; captive replacement parts available ly library hat are for eq ipmen ; and library materials for a public from the persons holding exclusive distribution rights to the ma- terials; need not be submitted to competitive bids; and WHEREAS, the City council wishes to procure one or more of the items mentioned in the above paragraph; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDA!NS: SECTION I. That the following purchases of materials, equip- ment or supplies, as described in the "Purchase orders" attached hereto, are hereby approved: PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT XEROX $28,800.00 31330 CHECK RSQUIFiTION TEXAS WATER COMMISSION $10,300.00 SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above items shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the quotation for such items until such person shall comply with all requirements specified by the Purchasing Department. SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any contracts relating to the is he7eby pursuant to items said contracts SectionI and the yxpenditure of funds authorized. Agbida That this ordinance shall become effective immedi- SECT__ z0-N IV' assage and approval. atelY upon its p day Of 1992. PASSED AND APPROVED this the BOB CAST] MAYOR i ATTEST' CITY SECRETARY JENNIFER WALTERSr BY: FOM APPROVED ADRAyOVITCHL CITY ATTORNEY DEBRA I BY : - - { i I I . I i, Ago nda No Aoendallom_._~X'_.. DkTE:_DECEM E-R • 9,-1992 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM; Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PC # 31330 - XEROX CORP. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend Purchase Order # 31330 to Xerox Corporation be approved in the amount of $28,800.00. SUMMARY: This purchase order is for the annual maintenance and meter usage charge on the Xerox 4050 Laser Printer. The amount is based upon the 5 year lease purchase price agreement approved by Council in February of 1992. The maintenance charge is a fixed monthly charge, The meter charge is estimated based upon a per copy charge. The Data Processing Advisory Board recommend approval. BACKGROUND: Purchase Order #31330, Data Processing Advisory Board Minutes of November 11, 1992, Invoice for October 1992. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMINTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Information Services. FISCAL IMPACT: This maintenance agreement will be funded from 1992-93 budget I funds account number #100-044-0080-8341 balance is $54,728.00. Respect lly submitted: 41od Harrell ger Approved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent agenda. 314 y THIS IS A - CITY of DENTQN, TEXAS CONFIRMING ORDER PxX (IF MARKED) - PURCHASE ORDER NO; F C 31230 DO NOT DUPLICATE _ Thla number must appoar on oil invoices, , delivery slips, cases, Req No: Bld No: tins., boxes, packing slips and bills. Date: 11 2 Z 9 2 Page No. G 1 N WE/ XEACX DOR PURCHASING olVIS10N / 9019 CORPCRAiION TEXAS STREET /OENTON, TEXAS 76701 )DRESS F ~ C r 1 3GX 25177 8111183-7100 0/FWMETR0817/2670042 FAX8177382.4692 )DRESS SANTA ANA DELIVERY CONFIRNATICI~ CNLV C11 CA 52795°5177 ADDRESS INFCAIIATICN SEFYICE: II YtSTFiCFF X4164 32413 Ee MCKINNEY DENTON• TX 76241 VENDOR NO. XE.9456fli1 DELIVERY QUOTED 119 311 53 FOB DEETINAT]ON TERMS Gl 2sEb0.0U0 FA F-NCCR CAT. M N / A CI7Y i 93927 MFG NAME LOGO MAINTENANCE CHARGE E METER USAGE FFOM 10-2-92 7HRU 9-.:0-93 249600000 i { A Wcu a) Fu R w z Si A 1 100 044 0080 PAGE TCTAL i 28.800.00 6341 28*E4C.C0 FANC TOTAL 2 78~80t3•C0 VEfJDOR INSTRUCTIONS: 3. Terms -Net 301unioas oiherwi~ so I . Sued original Invoice with duplicate copy. on 2 Bit, to - Accounts Payable S. Shipping ra slats s: F.O.B. Dostinbe In ludedd {1n e5s orherwls9 snoc!rrod) 5. No federai le slab sales tax shall be ncluded 215 F McKinney SI in pricas billed. Pnrrh ncinn fliric inn I r l MINUTES OF DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD MEETING OF NOVEMBER 11, 1992 MEMBERS PRESENT: Don Edwards, Rosa Lawton, Brian Scott and Jim Kuykendall a MEMBERS ABSENT: Robert Minnis OTHERS PRESENT: Gary Collins Don Edwards made a motion that minutes of the September 1, 1992 Data Processing Advisory Board meeting be approved. Brian Scot*_ seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Gary Collins explained that the maintenance agreement with Mr.. Bobby Gray was a continuation of technical support for the payroll personnel system known as EIS. The City of Denton has utilized the services of Mr. Bobby Gray for the last 4 years since the Control Data Corporation discontinued providing support for this software product. Gary Collins indicated the increase of $3,000 from last year's agreement was due to the City's plans to utilize Mr Gray's services in the implementation of an interface from the EIS system to the Job Costing portion of the accounting system known as LGFS. Gary Collins further explained that Mr, Gray's services would be utilized in the implementation of changes to the EIS system to accommodate the merit pay system associated with the Mercer study. Don Edwards made a motion that the Data Processing Advisory Board recommend the City Council approve the maintenance agreement with Mr. Bobby Gray for the EIS system. Rosa Lawton seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Gary Collins explained that the maintenance agreement with Weston Consulting was a continuation of the technical support for the Utility Billing system known as CIS. This past year D B Microware changed its name to Weston Consulting but for the past 4 years have been providing technical support to the City of Denton on the CIS system. Gary Collins explained that in mid December, we will be implementing a new version of the CIS system that will be a real time on line system with the capabilities of performing random updates rather than sequential processing. Gary Collins indicated that $6,000 increase from last year's agreement was due to the plans to utilize the services of Weston Consulting extensively during the implementation phase and to have two members of the firm on site to resolve any problems that might occur during the implementation. Brian Scott made a motion that the Data Processing i!Ar;.sory Board recommend the City Council approve this maintenance agreement. Jim Kuykendall seconded the motion and the motion was passed unanimously. Gary Collins explained that the maintenance agreement for the year on the Xerox laser printer was now due and that the price of a b~nnda No. ltom Agenda maintenance on the Xerox laser printer for the five years o the lease purchase had been established and agreed to when the City of with Xex in Denton entf ed ~92tO the Lease Edwards Purchase a gmotiont that then Data February ° rove the Processing Advisory Board recommend the City Council app maintenance agreement on the XereX 40assed aser unanimously Brian Scott seconded the motion and the motion p There being no further new business the meeting was adjourned. 7 I 11 XEROX CORPORATION To"M WY WAY=i' NONE REQUIRED A PRINTING SYS/X9-01 eFumhueora«N""aNo.___~t PO BOX 660501-eoo•eas•»oo Sp•olel R•lsrsrleshBCll~a~t8iT1_-_~__ '.DALLAS TX T5266 VTX00000X-Q,OQ Controct Number Til~phon• gp0-527-k'L64 NET 30 DAYS Plwe DIr•ot Inquiries Tor 4► Terms 01 payment Ship Tollnstslied At: AIII To: CITY OF DENTON CITY OF DENTON 11~1~-82 DATA'PROCESSiNG LINDA JOHNSTON Invoke M 324 D. E MCKINNEY ST. 324 E MCKINNEY ST 038314667 DENTON TX B InvolcmNyntbu 76201 DENTON TX ~8T88A8~2 76201 ultomer, umber 4050 PRINTING SYSTEM SER,# Y87-103314 1 X 5 MONTHLY FSM . AM'OTJRT . MAINTENANCE CHARGE OCTOBER 1,020.00 METER USAGE 09-30•-92 TO 10-30-92 PAGES 922900 1236566 313666 I TOTAL PAGES 313666 LESS PAGE CREDITS 1050 NET PAGES 312616 NET BILLABLE PAGES 312616 .003700 1t156.68 TOTAL METER CHARGES 11156.68 1t1!Ib.68 OCTOBER YSOL ONLINE MODULE PROD/MKT CD Y75 100.00 SUB TOTAL 2t276t68 TOTAL 2,276.68 METER CARD NOT RECEIVED FOR OCTOBER METER USAGE. INVOICE REFLECTS MET;":R READS FROM LAST SERVICE CALL. PLEASE MAIL METER CARD ON OR AFTER THE 20TH OF EACH MONTH. PLEASE INITIATE AN AMENDMENT OR RENEWAL FOR YOUR EXPIRED SE ORDER I TOTALAOF INVOICEOMAYRVARYRACCORDING TO METER USAGE BILLED XEROX PCDERAE IDENTIFICATION 016-046-8020 .11AIr AITAtn TMI YAMMtb• rMTUY AFC AITVIM WITM MR AIMOITAKCI A.IVr ♦VA1ll.n. I CI/F.rr.Menp. 1. 41nH IR.Wry Add,,... Ship To/Instetl•d At., EIII To] SEND PAYMENT TO: CITY OF DENTON CITY OF DENTON XEROX CORPORATION DATA PROCESSING LINDA JOHNSTON P.O. BOX 25177 324 B. E MCKINNEY ST 324 E MCKINNEY ST 0 SANTA ANA, CA DENTON TX B 92799-5177 76201 DENTON TX "on ..ylne n..Ir.M.. uv b. Aw.r.o na. 76203. MYele•Awmat jpr X•res Us* Only ; M I w - PLEASE PAY Ipt a;4t, fd$fo 00-495-2792 4 662889542 035314667 11-12-92 THIS AMOUNT>It~IlAi2'i.b.Ma3~, RROO8286 100192 ~/TX10 04 314Y XPS5 D FB500 2901 1 3-15 202100008070060 0353146677 03022'76684 266288954244 DEC 1 192 15:54 817 556 6533 PAGE,001 } 4 P,~onJaNo ✓J IjA32 E; DEGEMRBRBz 1992 l~ /U CIT~y_ COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: CHECK REQUISITION - TEXAS WATER COMMISSION $10,300.00 REC )MMENDA'f'ION: We recommend payment to the 'Texas Water Commission in the amount of $10,300.00 be app annually b sion to any holder wAll fees indspection to a assessed fund that supplement eothermfunds a ' f the pay pp y p riated by in Inspe treatment facilitieseandlenforcing thecprovisions of the leixasoWater Codei~lgwaste BACKGROUND: Check Requisition November 9, 1992, Memorandum from Howard Martin , FECTED- 111110GRAIIIIALS of the UpARYIMeINTSmOR a R~ ipZen Fof Denton, Waste Wate. Treatment Division FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted Funds for Wastewater Treatment Special Services for 5993 Acco626-082-070-8502 the balance is $74,207.00. Respect illy submitted: ~W u d Harrell City Manager II Prepared by: 7a Name: Denise Harpool Title: Senior Buyer Approved: Name. Torn D. Shaw, Titlet Purchasing Agent ogondn.315 w I A0611daNo. A~end2ttam r F,EOUISIT10N .VOUCHER CHECK cn,. A9 i FAY TO: ~Vo l q 10 6 NET AM ` ACCT, NO. INVOICE DATE, NUM9ER pNDlOR EXPLANATION joke j~?- r 101 I ~ u Pz ter ~~v , TOTAL BEEN REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDATION FOR BILLING IS MADE SY THE UNDERSIGNED- THE ABOVE HAS SE 6lQNr 1UR~ r ACCQ APPROVAI- OF FINANCE APPROVAL DIRE MANAGER APPROVAL 1 I CHECK REOUISITION-VOUCHER 'NJondaNo .__~~__,3 ~ Agenda /d t \ PAY T0; CHECK NUMBER LLL vv uy~l....i.L~~ ~iM i SS I Cpl , o ~8u ~u, ?,a0 Lro 1 AMOUNT DEpAR1MENi _ cZ GATE INVOICE DATE, NUMBER AND/OR EXPLANATION ACCT. NO. NET INV. AMT. 00bolo3co-,~-3 f I1 C4 VIW D' 1 coL • FY wcL_tK O~AWEFiw !-4uwarc~ p.'t~ r~ir~. Serer Ks. y TOTAL] THE A80VE HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDATION FOR BILLING IS MADE BY THE UNDERSIGNED, ACCOUNTINO APPAOVAL _ 71 SIOHATURE CITY WANA0EA APMOVAL ~ ~ OiAEC1011 6F FINANCE APPROVAL s r CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING /DENrON, TEXAS 76201/TELEPHONE(817)566.8200 OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES TO: Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent w FROM: Howard Martin DATE: December 2, 1992 SUBJ. Annual Texas Water Commission Inspection l'ae ~I The Wastewater Treatment Division is inspected annually by the Texas Water Commission, The Texas Water Commission requires payment for these inspections in accordance with 31 Texas Administrative Code (TAC), Chapter 305, Subchapter M. for all t discharge permit holders under the Texas Water Code, Chapter 26. Failure to pay 0e annual inspection fee may result in fines and interest penalties for past due accounts. Past inspection fees have not approved by the Public Utility Board or the City Council because these fees have been less than $10,000. The TWC inspection fee is a budgeted expenditure in the Wastewater Treatment Division budget (625--082--0470-8502). Please find attached to this memorandum, the invoice for $10,300 and a check requisition for payment. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 8237. Howard Martin, D'rector of Environmental Operation/Financial Adm. FIhE:C:\MISC\TWCINSP DE.1~=~~AT~L7 ".L''C7 ~LTAS.,~rI'Y SERV.'ZC~ I MIL CITY C®UNCH iii H-H i 1. T i i o~~DOpoOtiQQQ~~DOO 000 { a r ~~o . . ~ . o C 0 o OG ~ 0~~~~000 QCpOp~~Qo - - ~rx [tile a . /c ORDINANCE: NO. U AN ORDINANCE: AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT IffrH BOBBY V. GRAY d.b.a. EIS SUPPORT SERVICES, FOR PERSONNEL SERVICES RELATING TO ANNUAL MAINTENANCE OF THE HIS (PAYROLL) SOFTWARE; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING THE EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: X SECTION I. That the Mayor Is authorized to execute an agreement between the City of Denton and Bobby V. Gray d.b.a. HIS Support Services, for personnel services relating to the EIS (Payroll) Softwarn Maintenance, under the terms and conditions contained In said agreement, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION II. That the City Council hereby authorized the expenditure of funds in the manner and amount as specified in the agreement. SECTION 111. That this ordinance shall become offectivoimmediatolyupon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this tho.._.. day of _ 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, 1VIAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER Wt1LTER5, CPl'Y SECRE`T'ARY APPROVED AS TO LE(..AL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCII, CITY A'T'TORNEY 044. DOG Pwida Na..__ DAtI?E~-DECMBER-B, 1992 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PC # 31331 HIS SUPPORT SERVICES (BOBBY V. GRAY) RECOMMENDATION: We recommend Purchase Order #31331 to HIS Support Services in the amount of not to exceed $16,000.00 for annual maintenance of the HIS Software Syatem. SUMMARY: This procurement is for personal service to provide monthly information, maintenance and assistance with regard to the payroll/ personnel information system product known as HIS (Employee Information Service). Included In thiis consulting service are 2 days per month on-site assistance training, problem enhancement of the software. Services are to be provided on an as needed basis for an estimated 256 hours at $62.50 per hour. This service has been determined to be a personnel service procurement and exempt from the bid process. The EIS Software has been discontinued by the original designers TRES, Inc. as well as the current owners Control Data Corporation and is considered obsolete by their standards. CDC is no longer supporting or markHIS software. eting experience , knosledgdba HIS e and qualifications to efficiently m intain and with satisfactory enhance this software system. The Data Processing Advisory Board recommends approval. BACKGROUND: Purchase Order PC#31331, Minutes from Data Processing Advisory Board of November 11, 1992, sample agreement between City of Denton and Bobby V. Gray dba HIS Support Services. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Information Services, Payroll and Personnel Divisions, FISCAL IMPACT: 1993 Budget Funds for maintenance of software account #100-049- 0080-8802. Rnspec lly submitted: ~~Ioy 11ell City Manager Approved- Name: Tom D. Shaw, C,P.M. Title: Purche.aing Agent agenda. 213 7 THIS IS A C!! Y of L&NI UN1 T EXAS CONFIRMING ORDER XXx - PURCHASE ORDER NO: PC `•.1331 (IF MARKED) This number must appear on nil DO NOT DUPLICATE Invoices, delivery slips, cases, ctns, boxes, packing slips and bills. Req No: Bid No: Date: 11 22 52 Pate No. 01 d c NDOR PURCHASING OMS104 1901.8 TEXAS STREET 7 DENTON, TEXAS 76201 WE/ yy ppA 8171363.7100 01FW61ETR0 8j 71267 0042 FAX8171382,4692 EISBSUPPRPTSLFVICES DELIVERY CCNFIRMAIICk CNLY CIL JDRESS 2209 CHAMBERLAIN DRIVE INFCRMATICN SERVICES FLANC TX 7E023 ADDRESS 2248 E• NCKIIrNEV UEN70Nr TX 769&1 I VENDORNO. EEP480010 DELIVERY QUOTED 11 30 92 FOB OESTINA7IGN TERMS I;I1 12.040 2A ENDOR CAT• A N / A MFG NAVE 193330340 1E.OOq.OE CITY N 93921 EI9 MAINTENANCE 11-2-92 - 10-31-93 sG' as (D SU ~y 3 a t PAGE TG7AL 1 160 0 06 RAND ;CIAL 1 1690 iiiillll0.0E 11 IOU 044 00410 eii02 160000008 cENDOP INSTAUCTtONS: 3. Terms - Net 3011 oess otherwise Wodliod i Serxt original involce wllh duplicate copy, 4. Shipping Instructions: F.O.B. Denlinptlon pcepakt Iunless oiPmwisa s1mcmdi BIII to Accounts Payable G. No federal or slain sales IN Shall be Included 216 C, McKinney Si. in prices billed. - n.~i.., Tv rrtnnt f urchasing Division s~ M Ac~entlalterr~_...~~5_'~~p.m 1)li MINUTES OF / DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD !~J{ MEETING OF NOVEMBER 11, 1992 MEMBERS PRESENT; Don Edwards, Rosa Lawton, Brian Scott and Jim Kuykendall MEMBERS A.BSENTt Robert Minnis OTHERS PRESENT; Gary Collins Don Edwards made a motion that minutes of the September 11 1992 Data Processing Advisory Board meeting be approved, Brian Scott seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Gary Collins explained that the maintenance agreement with Mr, Bobby Cray was a continuation of technical support for the payroll personnel system known as EIS, The City of Denton has utilized the services of Mr. Bobby Cray for the last 4 years since the Control Data Corporation discontinued providing support for this software product, Gary Collins indicated the increase of $3,000 from last year's agreement was due to the City's flans to utilize for Gray's services in the implementation of an to the job Costing por ion i>,terfaee from the EIS system of the accounting system known as LGrs, Gary Collins further explained that Mr. Gray's services would be utilized in the implementation of changes to the EIS system to accommodate the merit pay system associated with the Mercer study, Don Edwards made a motion that the Data Processing Advisory Board recommend the City Council approve the maintenance agreement with Mr. Bobby Gray for the EIS system, Rosa Lawton seconded the mution and it passed unanimously, Gary Collins explained that the maintenance agreement with Weston Consulting was a continuation of the technical suppor4 for the changed its lam to Weem known an CIS, This past year D B oroware Consulting but for the been providing technical support to the City of Denton on athehCIS system. Gary Collins explained that in mid December, we will be implementing a now version of the CIS system that will be a real time on line system with the capabilities of performing random rath than $6, 0 0 er incree tha sse front 1as processin g. Gary Collins indicated plans to utilize the services ofe Weston Consulting extensively during the implementation phase and to have two members of the firm on site to resolve any problems that might occur during the implementation. Brian Scott made a motion that the Data processing Advisory board recommend the City Council. approve this maintenance agreement, Jim Kuykendall seconded the motion and the motion was passed unanimously, Gary Collins explained that the maintenance agreement for the year on the Xerox laser praiite:c was now due and that the price of A,milemNO maintenance on the Xerox laser printer for the five years of the6 lease purchase had been established and agreed to when the City of 4Y Denton entered into the Lease Purchase agreement with Xerox in February of 1992. Don Edwards made a motion that the Data Processing Advisory Board recommend the City Council approve the maintenance agreement on the Xerox 4050 laser printer. Brian Scott seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously. There being no further new business the meeting was adjourned. I I ...tit h k3ondalta~~_.._~ S AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND BOBBY d,FtAY^ The City of Denton, Texas, a Municipal Home Rule City situated in Denton County, Texas, hereinafter called "City," acting herein by and through its City Manager, and Bobby V. Gray, hereinafter called "Consultant," hereby mutually agree as follows: 1. MM-CCAS TO BE PERWORMED: City hereby retains consultant to perform the hereinafter designated services and Consultant agrees to perform the following services: j A. Providing information and assistance by telephone or in writing uith regard to the software product known as Employee Information Syste+n. B. Performing on-site assistance, training and problem resolution for 2 days each month. C. Furnishing enhancements to insure compliance with Federal and state tax reporting for employees. D. Telephona assistance will be available Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. central time, excluding holidays. E. Availability of City Resources: City will make available to Consultant the following: 1. Use of a terminal for access program librarie+e and files to allow problem resolution and implementation of enhancements. II. SCHEDULE OF SERVICES: A. Services will be provided beginning December 1991 through September 1992 on an on-call as-needed basis. All I; I I (ha No ~ rlq,,andaRai) xII. 9Qb9L1LNQATION TO BIE PAID CONTRACTOR: City agrees Leo pay Consultant for the services performed hereunder as follows: Estimated A. ConsultAd Rate Estimated Hours Faes E ensea $76.92 206 $16,000 8. Within 10 days of completion of services and provided for herein and of receipt of invoice, IV. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR; It is mutually understood and agreed by the between City and Consultant that Consultant is an independent Consultant and ohall not be deemed to be or considered an employee of the City of Denton, Texas, for the purposes of income tax, withholding, social security taxes, vacation or sick leave benefits, worker's compensation, or any other city employee benefit. Consultant shall perform the +,services hereunder at the direction of and to the satisfaction of the City Manager of the City of Denton or his designee under this agreement. V. 9Qt~CE OS Stl~DB: All payments to consultant under this Agreement are to be paid by the City from funds appropriated by the City Council for such purposes in the Budge'.: of the City of Denton. VI. xNebZRA -4. Consultant shall provide at its own cost and expense workers' compensation insurance, liability insurance, and all other insurance necessazy to protect Consultant in the operation of Consultant's business. VCI. INyEMNIB'T TI~~(: Consultant shall and does hereby &grea to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Denton fxom any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever, by reason of injury to property or third persons arising from any negligent act or omission of Consultant, its officers, agents, employees, invitee, and other persons for whom it is legally liable, in this course oi' the performance of this agreement, and Consultant will, at its coat and expense, defend and protect the City of Denton against any acid all such claims and demands. k, G Agenda llera_ VIII.CJ►NCELI,ATION: City and Consultant each reserve the` right to cancel this Agreement at any time by giving the other party fourteen (14) days written notice of its intention to cancel this Agreement, provided the City pays Consultant for services performed prior to notice of cancellation. IX. TERM OF CONTRACT: This Agreement shall commence on the _ _AOt_ day of December , 1992, ant: end upon the completion of the project. EXECUTED this day of 1992. 1 CITY Or DENTON, TEXAS BY: _y ATTEST: JENNIFER MALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: hgonda Na l r ~ Agoada Item_!G L _ I APPROVED AS TO LEGULL FORM DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCHr CYTY ATTORNEY BY: CONBUI~TANT / CITY COUNCIL X'I r - i I I I 1 OOOO~~~ Of o e pp ~ ~o pD - I I . DDOOO~~oo ~ ~ ~oOVOp', 0 ~pd60GUG AgendaPlo....klwiJ r 1 t~~ia a Z194 ORDINANCE NO.__._._-.---- WITH E AUTHORIZING THF. MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT ANNUAL WE URDINANC FOR PERSONNEL SERVICES RELATING )SOFTWARE; STON (;ONSULTING, MAINTENANCE OF THE CIS (CUSTOMER SERVICE UTILITY BILLING 1'H AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING `E EFFECTIVE DATE. OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: OF THE CITY T1II~, COUNCIL Mayor is authorized to execute an agreement ;IECTION I. That the May for personnel services relating r - onBultingg gi111n )Software, under the between the City of Denton and Weston C mer Service Utility g , which is attached hereto and made to the MaIntonanco of the CIS (Customer torms and conditions contained in said agreement a part hereof . the City Council hereby authorized the expenditure SECTION ii. That ecified in the agreomont. of funds in te, manner and amount as sp !"ECTION III. That this ordinance shallbecomo effective immediately upon its passage nd apProval. day of PASSED AND APPROVED this the iflfl2. I3Uli CASTLBFBRRRY, MA )YC R ATTEST: JENNIFER WAI1hRS, APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMI. DEBRA A- DRAYOVITCH, CITY A'i"PORNEY oaa,nx V , J\r~ 1992 T~AT E, llECINBF.R 8, a( A CITY COUNCIL RPPOR'P TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council I''ROM: Lloyd V, Ilarrell, City Manager SUBJECT; pC # 31332 WESTON CONSULTING RECO ENDATION: We recommend approval of purebase order #31332 to Weston Consulting in the amount of not to oxceed $15,000.00 for annual maintenance of the CIS Software System, personal service to provide monthly SUGARY: This procurement is for a and to the utility billing software consult ng in£ormatian, maintenance and assistance with rog Ineluded ro In this b resolution. service ta ©°2 days sCper(month on-site as~sistancestt airing and p basis for Services are to be provided on an as needed au estimated 255 hours at $62.60 per hour, exempt t antloration. ~j The C!S Softwareebae beenrdisco tinued by the original 'I'bis service hasbeeli ,determined as well as tine current owners Centro! Data Corporation. from the bid process. designers, IRIS, Inc CTS Software, Weston Consulting is t~jn CDC is no longer supporting or o Inc. employ e and Up Of agroup of former TRES cas that participated in the origins The p rice, service oil than C1S nuals with software ong to effi iently maintain t.hlsdsoftware system. ication CDC prior to them discontinuing the support of that i of that charged by software, Data Processing Advisory Beard recommends approval, BACKGROUND: Purchase Order # PC 31332, Data Processing Advisory Board ilAC reement betwoen City of Denton acrd M{mites of Novembor 11, 11392 and sample ag Woston Consulting. I));P+R.TMENTS OR GROUT'S AFFECTED: Information Services, Utility PROGRAMSk lting Division. LISCAL LMPACT: 1993 VY Budgeted runds Account #100-044-0080•,8502- ~ tgwrlaNn Agenda ltom CITY COUNCIL REPORT DECEMBER 8, 1992 PACE 2 OF 2 R3spec ,gully submitted: Li d V. Harrell City Manages' Approved: LM, Tom D. Shaw, C.P•M Title : Purchasing Agent egenJa210 CITY of DENTON, TEXAS PURrcHbeS{1n10RDl ear oOil C 31,-2 THIS IS A Involcos, delivery slips, casos, CONFIRMING ORDER r %K rlns.,boxes, pacKing slips and bills. (IF MARKED) Page No. d 1 DO NOT DUPLICATE - - Date: 11 2 i S2 i Bid i Rao No: PURCHASI OIVISJON19EIRO6 1 7126 7 004 2 1FAtX817/3824ti?cCNFIFMATIGK GNLY C11 U 171383 JfNUOR DELIVERY INFCRMATICA SEFVIC> ADDRESS 3ENjUN~ 7xK76iU1 JANE/ pfS,CBOXO8668A2NC~ 4UDRESS QLANC 7x 7511 TERMS , FOB DE-cTINATICN VENDOR NO, ~E5455i1G DELIVERY QUOTED 12 15 92 irSCO.0C0 180000rU4 N A MFG NAME t;A ENCOR CAT; a S2 131 12.Ob0 II # 93921 52 - SEPT• 30r 1• CIS MAINTENANCFFRCM CC70 1 I-v' rLa c~i <o ~i ~Q D ~ 18x00 • 18x000.00 FAhG ICIAL 202 18x000.00 100 044 0080 l floe prnpakt IUnlosa ollwrwVSO 8pocilieAl _ ~ Tor{ns -Not 30 tunb - _ acell - n No oil{irah o h,ollormIFosI~1a~~ojhJo111 VENDOR INSTFiUCT1ONSt 1 0 lncknlarV - I, Sorxl odglnnl InvnlCO wGfl dupl'ca a copy, n pncus hill, 2. [J111 to 7Acownla 161 IAcKlnraioy St, 9 THIS IS A CITY of DENTON, TEXAS CONFIRMING ORDER Xxx (IF MARKED) D PURCHASE ORDER NO- DO NOT DUPLICATEThis number must appear an all F C 3 I, 2 invoices, delivery slips, cases, Noq No: Bid No c1ns., boxes, packing slips and bills Data: 11 22 s 2 Page No. vJ 1 I )ENDOR PURCHASING DIVrS1ow9w.6TEXAsswer7DENrON, rEXAS76201 DAME/ WESTCh CONSULTING 817/393.7100 D1FWMFrR08177267-0042 FAXSWG? 2.4692 aDDR[SS P•C• BOX 866882 DELIVERY CCNFIRMATICN CNLV C11 PLANC 7X 76086 ADDRESS 1NF'CRMA7ICA' SEFVICE5 324B E• MCKINIKEY DENIGN. TX 76201 VENDOR NO. YES45800 DELIVERY QUOTED 12 15 92 FOB DE£7INA7ICN Ti:RMS ~ 01 12•41utA EA ENCOR CAT. A N / A CI7V # 93921 MFG NAME 1•EG0.0CG CIS MAIN'TENANCEFRCM CC7. It 92 - SEPT. 30• 91 18•il00•UG r FS On p ' wa N 6 a ~ 1 140 044 0080 PAGE TCIAL 2 18x00 . Q 8902 189000000 6AJ`C 7C7AL 1 Is coca 34 VENDOf'i INSTRUCTIONS! V- --3. Terms - Nat 301unbss o~bnrvnse sneclrrod) _ I Send original Invoice with duplicate copy. 4. Shipping Inslrucllomw r 06 Dosllnalron prapakl lunless cote +so srw re,i) 2. Bill to - Accounts Payable 6 No ledoral or stale sales lax shall be hndu(lod 2 15 E. McKinney St, in priers billed. 4i.podahom...~{~s MINUTES OF DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD MEETING OF NOVEMBER 11, 1992 MEMBERS PRESENT: and Edwards? jim rosa Lawton, Brian Scott MEMBERS ABSENT: Robert Mi.nnis OTHERS PRESENT: Gary Collins Don Edwards made a motion t1tat minutes of the September 1, 1992 Data Processing Advisory Board meeting be approved. Brian Scott seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. r Gary Collins explained that t:he maintenance agreement with Mr. Bobby Gray was a continuation of technical support for the payroll personnel system known as EIS. The City of Denton has utilized the services of Mr. Bobby Gray fog the last 9 years since the Control Data Corporation discontinued providing support for this software product. Gary Collins indica•tf?d the increase of $3,000 from last year's agreement was due to the, City's plans to utilize Mr Gray's services in the implementation of an interface from the EIS system to the Job Costing portion of the accounting system known as LGFS. Gary Collins further explained that Mr. Gray's services would be utilized in the implementation of changes to the EIS system to accommodate the merit pay system associated with the Mercer study. Don Edwards made a motion that the Data Processing Advisory Board recommend the City Council approve the maintenance agreement with Mr. Bobby Gray for the EIS system. Rosa Lawton seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Gary Collins explained that the maintenance agreement with Weston Consulting was a continuation of the technical support for the Utility Billing system known as CIS. This past year D B Mi.croware changed its name to Weston L'onstzlting but for the past A years have been providing technical support to the City of Denton on the CIS system. Gary Collins explained that in mid December, we will be implementing a new version of, the CIS system that will be a real time on line system with the capabilities of performing random updates rather than sequential processing. Gary Collins indicated that $6,000 increase from last year's agreement was due to the plans to utilize the services of Weston Consulting extensively during the implementation phase and to have two members of h firm on site to resolve any problems that might during occur the implementation. Brian Scott made a motion that the Data Processing Advisory Board recommend the City Council approve this maintenance agreement. Jim Kuykendall seconded the motion and the motion was passed unanimously. Gary Collins explained that the maintenance agreement for the year on the Xerox laser printer was now due and that the price of • J gee ears o~~ a ~ rtr'/D the Xerox laser printer for the £i whey the City o£ nce on !l// recd to with Xerox in maintenarchase agreement en established an ag motion that the Data lease purchase had be pu Denton e ntered into the Lease made approve the Don Edwards city council of 1992. 4050 laser printer. Brian Scott processing Advisory Board reXeroXnd the maintenance agreement and on the Motion passed unanimously. seconded the motion the the meeting was adjourned. There being no further new business I r s Apoda No Aovdaltsrq_-/!? s, `7/ maintenance on the Xerox laser printer for the :five rrtu years R'7 a~ e laase purchase had been established and agreed to when the City of Denton entered into the Lease Purchase agreement with Xerox in February of 1992, Don Edwards made a motion that the Data Processing Advisory Board recommend the City Council approve the maintenance agreement on the Xerox 9050 laser printer. Brian Scott seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously, There being no further new business the meeting was adjourned. f~* h i I \t e .J 7 AgontlaItom_. Y AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE f<l /D CITY OF DENTON AND WESTON CONSVLTINO _ The City of Denton, Texas, a Municipal Hoare Rule City situated in Denton County, Texas, hereinafter called "City," acting herein by and through its City Manager, and Weston Consulting, horeinafter called "Consultant," hereby mutually agree as follows. 1. 9TO BE PERFORMED; City hereby retains consultant to perform the hereinafter designated servicea and Consultant agrees to perform the following services; elf I I A. Providing information and assistance by telephone or in writing with regard to the software product known as Customer Information System. 0. Performing on-site assistance, training and problem resolution for 2 days each month. C. Furnishing enhancements to the Customer Information System, D, Telephone assistance will be available Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m, central time, excluding holidays. E. Availability of City Resources: City will make available to Consultant the following: 1. Use of a terminal for access program libraries and files to allow problem resolution and implementation of enhancements, Ix. SCHEDULE OF SERVICES: A. Services will be provided beginning December 1991 through September 1992 on an on-call as-needed basis, ~y V1 Tye 7 No, III. CO? ?S' 3ATION To E PAID CQNTRACTO$: City agrees to ;W i Consultant for the services performed hereunder as follows: Estimated A. Consultgd Rate Estimated Hors Fees zxpenses $93.75 192 $18,000 B. Within 10 days of completion of services and provided for herein and of receipt of invoice. IV. INDEPENDENT_CONTRACTOR: it is mutually understood and agreed by the between City and Consultant that Consultant is an independent Consultant and shall not be deemed to be or considered an employee of the City of Denton, Texas, for the purposes of income tax, withholding, social security taxes, vacation or sick leave benefits, worker's compensation, or any other city employee benefit. Consultant shall perform the services hereunder at the direction of and to the sat;.sfaction of the City Manager of the City of Denton or his designee under this agreement. V. SOURCE Q,SITyJM4: All payments to consultant under this Agreement are to be paid by the City from funds appropriated by the City Council for such purponos in the Budget of the City of Denton. VI. IN$_VRANC~; Consultant shall provide at its own cost and expense workers' compensation insuranct., liability insurance, and all other insurance necessary to protect Consultant in the operation of Consultant's business. VII. ~zl~IIBICATIQ : Consultant shall and does hereby agree to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Denton from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever, by reason of injury to property or third persons arising from any negligent act or omission of Consultant, its officers, agents, employees, invitee, and other persons for whom it 3.9 legally liable, in the course of the perfozmance of this agreement, and Consultant will, at its cost and expense, defend and protest the City of Denton against any and all such claims and demands, . Agenda No. __~s Agondaltom- 1/= 17:1e VIII.gAA7CELLATION: City and Consultant each reserve the' right to cancel this Agreement at any time by giving the other party fourteen (14) days Mrittnn notice of its intention to cancel this Agreement, provided the City pays Consultant for services performed prior to notice of cancellation. IX. TERM OF CONTRACT: This Agreement shall commence on the 10th _ day of _ December , 1992, and and upon the completion of the project. EXECUTED this _ day of 1992. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS I BY: ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: AyontiaNO...... i r.. APPRO AS TO LEA' roM ATTORNEY DggRA A• DWON=CHi CITY I i SY : CONSULTANT M 11 1 !Honda No, Ir Agondaltorn._ Iwo APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: CONSULTANT ti S R"Cl ITX It COUNCIL -TTI - -M { r` _ I -4 IJ O~~do r o ~A°. o t _XT a J00 N t f~oO~ annnnn W IT- h e;wpdocs\pa11co.o 900.30 r ...ll..,~wr J ORDINANCE NO. _ AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR THE PURCHASE OF EMPLOYEE GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE TO PHILADELPHIA AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the purchase of employee group health insurance in accordance with the procedures of state law; and I WHEREAS, the City Manager., his designee, and the City's professional insurance consultant, have received and recommended that the bid described below is the lowest responsible bid for the purchase of such insurance: as described in the request for Bid No. 1442 and Bid Submission Form; and WHEREAS, the City council has provided in the city Budget for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the insurance policies and coverages approved and accepted herein; NOW, THEREFORE, , THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the bid of Philadelphia American Life Insu- rance Company for the purchase of employee group health insurance, as described in the plans and specifications contained in the City's Request for Bid No. 1442, Bidder's response to the twenty- one questions raised in the City's Bid Submission Form and Bidder's clarification letter of 12/01/92 on file in the office of the City's Purchasing Agent and the terms and provisions of the contract contained in ordinance No. 91-169 and incorporated herein and made a part hereof for all. purposes (with the exception of the amendment to E):hibit A and Exhibit B of said contract) on file in the Office of the City Secretary, is hereby accepted and approved as being the lowca t responsible bid. SECTION II That the City Council hereby authorizes the ex- penditure of funds in the manner and amount as specified in the agreement. 0ECTI01L III;. That this ordinance shall. become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ day of 1.992. 11013 CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR d AgondsNo. Agend~ftem. ~S 7 ATTEST: ' JENNIFER WALTELS, CITY SECRETARY i BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A, DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY1 _ PAGE 2 ~ T{ 9 , ~cle~ttlaltnm__._L~ S `f J PHILADELPHIA AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMIPA'T ~J M R Q Box 2465 ^i- - Houston, Texas 77252 ' ~j (713) 8714600 an l~ j contpany November 18, 1992 Mr, Dave Palatiere Consultant Coopers & Lybrand 1999 Bryan Strcet Suite 3000 Dallas, TX 75201 Dear Dave; Enclosed is the formal City of Denton renewal bid. 't'hese fully insured rates are based on the schedule developed between you and John Kerr, If you have any questions, please contact me. yordi ~ly yours, I J ho Rahlfs, Jr, ccount Executive cc: John Kerr `i 6~4f:}'ell T EXHIBITII CITY OF DENTON PROPOSALS SUBMISSION FORM FOR FULLY-INSM= Managed Care BID Carrier/Vendors philadel hia American Life_?asuxance Co=apy - Date: -November 18,_ 1992 Completed By: Susanne I. Behrea~_~ie'President _ (Name & Title) Phone Number: r•131 871-4668 - - 1. Premium Rate for the Health Plan, net of commissioass f fiionthly ~'c2~ a ive Curr it Benefits Proposed Benefits AT 1/1/93 a. F,mployse Only $ b, Wazployee + Spouse 3 12. 80 ~ $ o, employee + Child 270.25 $ $ 391.00 _ d. h`msloyee + Family e. Ho-A lung are rates sno/Yr 1~mo/yr Varanteed? - )tetiree 272.62 a, Retiree Only b. Retiree + Spouse $ - - - o. Retiree + Children $ $ 52f 73 d. Retiree + Family Ret. zee 65 gr, Lrer-SS2;k MediaaKl ~ , . a. Retiree Only b. 2 on Medicare $ S--w C. 1 on, 1 o£f - 18 X72 cl. on + Family e. How long are retiree rates rao/Yr yimo/yr guaranteed? and any other tfees in addition to the F,remium Rates? It yes, 2. Are there amount. identify P POEadditiosaal aharce Identification Card 5.60/per employee/month Medical Conversion $ No additional chance Large Claim Management $ 3~t Annian~ele _ Bank Reconciliation Allendalip lr) 3. a• What claim payment software do CRAR you rase? T/•'000 is our modular Healthcare Analysis and Reimbursement we Technologi oepera~r whi c1a s (Cl3F,RT) system which acts as an Umbrella within e a variety of software, both internally and externally developed. Changes ~+'ithin the industry artandat:e Bdusng enha~ngoi ncements to rema'n competitive in price and exceed , try averages In c cy and production lmaintain this continual a enhancement ve.ls. ~ supported by a full se'.rvice data Center and e38, the system To .is wing team- Our claim an in-house a LllIY automated DatapCe~nret opera ions are processed thrrrough network of terminals locatod in Rtcbardson, Texas A . IBM 3090 mainfxame. r modems a*xi controllers are connected to an The nttoinuous our success an coont in customer ,satisfaction is th .if, is improvewe-Dt. Through enhancements p American able to on trol e emphasis processing Philadelphia moreia1eI be more resp operational costs Provide. onsive to cla.ail reduce kept powerful r,O;at containment toolrisant inJaires, and on the .leading edge of techno.lo Our clients are tlae discipline. ThE+y benefit from evoly 9 oastfo~ntaonment concepts, such as recent trends toward PPO, IPA, and Dnt pracessing, Some of the .featurf:s of CHART12000 are: 1• Integrated eIigib.ility. with claims history 2• Direct eligibility interface capability (tapF., to tape? transfer or dial-+lp with an upload to the eystem) 3. Dependent eligibility information maintained (name, DOA, relationship) 4. Flexible "hard coded" plan design automatically calculates benefit payment based on cllazit-specific plan de,eignr~) = Administration of multiple plan options, including plans, for one cl.ient 6. Immediate update rind tracking of plan benefits accumulators sucb as: Rental and .Nervous limitFations Deductibles Coinsurance percentages Annual and lifetime maximums Relnsurance limits Out of pocket maximums Occurrence limits 7• Automated reimbursement utilizing plan deductibles and coinsurance ice.. 4 ~pmltt No 8. Automated claims processing based on incurx i :te of expenses 9. Automated calculation of Usual and Customary charges based on customer selec e HT-AA percentile (.5: increments: 654' to 954•, recommend 854• to 90t) for surgery and dental and Medirisk for radiology, pathology, etc. 10. Identification of multiple PPO memberships for providers through maintenance of extensive provider information 11. Automated PPO benefits adjudication utilizing PPO discounts, PPO per diems, PPO co-pays or PPO schedule approaches 12. Adjudication of fixed-schedule benefits 13. Interface and adjudication of Prescription Card Service benefits 14. Automated coordination of benefits and subrogation 15. Integrated pre-certificat.t on/utilization review capability 16'. Batch payment (issuance of checks once a day, once a week, twice a month or tailored to a client's specific needs) 17. Bulk payment (issuance of one check to employee for claims on multiple :family members and one check to provider for claims from multiple patients) 18. Interface capability with third-party vendors 19. Pooled claim accounting 20. Administrative system with immediate interface to our claims adai.nistration system 21. Duplicate payment audit automatically performed based on service dates and provider 22. andpprocessing facilities nser roces ngcostswhilemmt1q chksecurity and control 23. Blectronir funds transfer capabi.titie's which provide an optimal cash flow position for our customers 24. Automated bank roconciiiation provided with full client reporting 2b. Compre-heaRive plan analysis reporting h r~:110 26. 15xtensive date base provides flexibility in customized fad hoc) management reporting 27. Full 1099 reporting on medical payments for providers b. Where are your claims processed? While Philadelphia American Life hav nine claims offices to process claims: 1) Houston, Texas; 2) Waco, Texas; 3) Louisville, Kentucky; 4) Racine, Wisconsin; 5) Ring of Prussia, Pennsylvania; 6) Agoura Hills, California; and 7) Sacramento, California and 8) Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and 9) Farmington, Connecticut, the City's claims would be processed by our Waco claim office which was established in 1978 and currently employs 25 people. The Waco office address is: Philadelphia American Life Insurance Company 100 North 6th Street Waco, TS 76701 Additionally, a dedicated Customer Service Unit is located in the Waco claim office. our Customer Service Representatives (CSR's) are available to respond to employee questions regarding benefits, eligibility and claims. Our Customer Service business hours are Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (CST). The toll free number is 1-800-333.9202 4. Is a software system or vendor change planned for the period 01/01/93-12/31/93? If so, to what system/vendor? A system upgrade is not planned for that period. our software has an open architecture and is basically modular in nature. We strive to anticipate chanyinq client and market needs. In keeping with our commitment to utilize the very best technology for our customers, we will coa:ltinue to install enhancements to the system we currently use. n r 5. Assuming that the contract for the City of Denton plan will bet 2ffecti-ve January 1, 1993, provide a detailed implementation plan for the transition on a separate sheet of paper. Be specific concerning your capabilities to load detailed coverage and claims history information. Should the Cit} of Denton select Philadelphia American Life to insure their group medical plan, we would assist the City in performing a re-enrollment of their employees. This should be performed as soon as possible after the contract has been awarded. It is most important that a complete eligibility lasting be provided so that appropriate ID cards can be issued. A record format will be provided to City of Denton to create an eligibility tape which can be loaded i into Philadelphia American Life's system. The eligibility list should be provided no later than the second week of December. An ~r application for Group Insurance will be provided immediately upon contract award, as well as a sample contract indicating the complete »schedule of benefits (outlined in general in this proposal) and any special provisions. ID cards would be available by late December (for January 1), booklets would be available within twti weeks of signing c.iient proofs. A Corporate Account Executive will be available to assist in the transition, assist with open enrollment, etc. 6. Claim. payment software features: I Which of the following features are inherent to your current claim payment software? a. Hard coded plan design X b. Direct eligibility interface 7C C. Deductible applied and calculated X d. Out-of-pocket applied and calculated X e. 17uplicate payment audit X f. Pooled claim accounting _X _W- g. luterface to pre-certification service 7. What percent of claims are subject to internal claim office audit? (random) + 100% certain specific claims (suspect providers, analyst exceeding authority limits, system overrides, certain dollar limit claims) y TT7 V~ kpndaIWO r,Z~ rate? g, Wb.at is your claims processing accuracy a• Transaction _9 .8 b• Dollar Value levels hin the last 9, please provide the o ~ Claims processing audi aact report (w your year), verJ.fying Philadelphia American Life has a formal quality management program which is administered by the Claims Administration department. foThe r claims manager of each regional office is responsible administering the quality program in that office. The manager guarantees that all requirements established by Claims Administration are satisfied. l~ Each office has a full-time auditor who reports to the office manager. The auditor randomly selects and audits 5t of each claim processor's dally claim production and 100* of those claims which exceed the processor's payment authorization lemma The audit: coding accuracy quality (a consists of monetary accuracy, combination of monetary and coding accuracy). A log of all claims audited is maintained and is available to Administration for review. The log references st specific claims audited, the error found and the Benefit main Gained far each Benefit claim. Additionally, quality records are Analyst and are available to the Benefit Analyst of to Administration upon request. The results of all audits are posted a monthly gual.ity report. This random audit. procedure represents the quality control of Philadelphia American Life's claims operations. It is an important part of the service we provide our clients. SPECIFICS OF AUDIT: 7M FOLLOWING I'T'EMS MUST BE AUDITED ON EACH CLAIM: Reject code necessary, correct Social Security Number Manual letter sent, if appropriate Group Neer Override necessary, correct Patient Name Med/Dent Register complote Received Dated correctly or Updated Correctly ASP changed History Loaded Correctly Pre-Existing Proper COB rules used Second Surgical Opinion Coordination on collect U&C charge Follow Instructions on IC Screen Other insurance payment indicated correctly Skipped Bills Payment correct Correct Claim Number Provider file dated update Correct Cause Code Charge Eligible Under Plan Correct Typecode, CPT Code Provider ID 7 1 Assigned Properly Pend Code Necessary, Coxrect Requested All Necessary .information Please see attached quality/production report showing the Waco offices results for yes N 10. Will your claim system facilitate a x future PFO plan design, either as a per diem based, or reduced charge, of higher coinsurance percentage, etc.? 11. Can the City of Denton Human Resources X Department access their claim files electronically and directly via an on-site modem? lone-TiLaq $Reaurr"n if so, what are costs (one-time 6,355'a -'J-M-o and recurring?) CHART/2000 has the fle;dbllity to allow a client ".inquiry" access to the client's eligibility information and claims history. 22ze client would be responsible for the direct cost of the hardware, data communication package, and ongoing data communication costs. There is an initial set up cost which would be determined by hardware i compatibility and any client-specific Px-o9r'amningAdditionally, we have the capability to download claims history data electronically or onto a diskette to facilitate client reporting. The cost for this service is also dependent upon client-specific programming costs. tijjft? t l2. Do you offer the following Utilization Review services? / eft so, please identify the services provided and describe your billing structure and estimated costs for each of the areas previously mentioned; i.e.r initial setup fees, monthly fees/employee or fees/service, minimum fees, etc. Philadelphia American Life is pleased to be in the position to provide The City of Denton with the services listed below at no additional cost to The City. Per Service Setup Yes -tL0_ EE/Mo. _'Pees P es 30SPITALIZAUM Pro-certification Reviews; S Continued Stay Reviewer x Concurrent Stay Reviewst R UR ER _ Second Surgical Opinion + g Reviewst Outpatient Surgery + L_ Reviewst - - - + Not required LAAROV, CASE MANA0SM23N'r' Research of Catastrophic X Cases t _ - AIDS Case Managements R Mental Health Case Managements _TVR SA,VI'CES Bill review & Claim Auditst _ x DRG Validations; R Ancillary Service X Evaluations Analysis Reports$ x_- TOTAL PLES N/A N/A Y-& oZA__ _m&_. 7 i I { 1, l Apnda i 13. Fu>sd Balance Statement N/A (Recap of Check Register showing fund balances with interest named, when deposits were made, etc.) 14. 3ospital Utilization X Reporting (Frequency and bed days) 15. Please provide a list of 3 client references, and a list of 3 former clients who have discontinued your services within the last two years. CURRSIVR' CLIOT5 Client: Stephen F. Austin State University Contact: Cathy Allen, Personnel Services Telephoner (409) 568-2304 Employees: 1. 275 Effective: 911190 Coverage: Medical, Life, & AD&D, Stn- Loss Coverage Client: Recognition Equipment, Incorporated Contact: George Lokey Telephone: (214) 57.9-6886 aMloyees: 975 Effective: 111186 Coverage: Medical, Dental, Vision, Life, Supplemental Life, Dependent Life, Stop Loss Coverage Client: Osteopathic Medical Center Contact: Anne Wilson telephone: (817) 735-3149 NwVloyees: 675 Effective: 611190 Coverage: Medical, Dental, Life, Stop Loss Coverage TREMMMM CLIENTS Client: Tenneco Contact: Howard Mead Telephone: (715) 757-2131 Employees: 12,000 Terminated: 111169 Reason for Termination: Left for reduced service levels at a reduced price. P~ h L'I1E~31tOtd J~ ~yy~ Client: The Houston Chronicle Contact: Beverly Lundberg Telephone: (713) 220-7171 Employees: 400 Terminated: 211189 Reason for Termination: Wanted a triple option plan with Indemnity,HKO & PPO. NOTE: The Houston Chronicle was very pleased with our service and rates and we continue to provide their Group Life and AD&D coverages. Client: House of Almonds Contact: Gerald R. Riley, Manager of Human Resources Telephone: (805) 835-6000 Employees: 188 Termination: 211189 Reason for Termination: Parent company sold them and the purchasing company's group coverage absorbed House of Almonds. * Those who left due to reduced price levels generally did so I to meet economic constraints within their industries. 16. Please provide a sample specimen of all agreements/contracts, etc. for all the above listed services. Please refer to the Agreement Section. 17. Please provide the most recent audited financial statement or a "Statement of Condition" if an auditeid financial statement is not applicable, for your firm. Please refer to the Exhibit Section of the binder. 18. If any insurance is proposed on a retention basis, please explain the reserves that will be established, the methodology for Citermining the amounts, and the disposition of the reserves upon termination of the contract. The insurance is being pror"sed on a non-retention (non-refund basis). The claims reserves will be established and maintained at: a level equal to the greater of 253 of annual eazned premium or 331 of annualized claims, upon termination of the policy, the reserves will remain with Philadelphia American Life since we will assume liability for the "run-off" claims. i Agondiltom-_.! S 1~o~ l ' 19. Please explain the COBRA administration offered by your organizKtion and any additional costs for these services. The following are COBRA services offered to The City of Denton. Philadelphia American Life will: CI) Accept COBRA election forms from qualified beneficiarie, (as defined by COBRA). b) Bill qualified beneficiaries for contribution of coverage premium. c) Collect premium from qualified beneficiaries and post the individual billing record. d) Deposit individual premium checks and issue a single check monthly to The City of Denton. e) Monitor earn continuee's eligibility period. F) Send cancellation of coverage notifications and conversion information. g) Provide claim submission information and forms. h) Provide customer service for inquiries regarding premium payment and status, i) Notify con.tinuees of rate changes. J) Provide reports to the Policyholder regarding premium receipts and covered continuees. There would loe no cost to the City of Denton for Cobra administration. We have many clients for which we provide COBRA service for medical and dental. A sample COBRA enrollment form and payment record are included In the Exhibit Section. 20. Does your proposal require that you provide all of the insurance and/or services specified in this RFP, or will you "unbundle" the services proposed? As we are proposing only insured medical at this time, this question is not applicable. j. 21„ Please providekyour reof=,anded plan deigns based upon the n__ w ork networ point Va. PROPOSSED' 7 UI E 1/93EF TS 01/ CITY OF DENTON NSTWORX * NON-NETWORK SERVICE Physician's office visit $15 per visit plus $50 Deductible plus 40% of copay for diagnostic sover chedule plus any amount services. Preventive Cara $15 per visit plus $50 Not Covered. Well baby cc a for diagnostic r' (Recommended services. Schedule) Routine $15 per vialit plus $50 Not Covered. Immunizations copay for diagnostic services. Annual Health $15 per visit plus $50 Not Covered. Assessment copay for diagnostic services. Employee/Covered Spouse 35 years or older. Includes: Chest X-Ray, 1 Urinalysis, EI:0, 1 Blood Testing. Well Woman Exam, Annual (once every $15 per visit plus $50 Not Covered. 12 months) copay for diagnostic services. Routine Vision, Speech, Hearing Screiming 0 through cage 17 $15 per visit plus $50 Not Covered. copay for diagnostic services. in-Hospital. :lervices (1) No limits on $500 deductible, 100% dedua er admission ible medically xseeeseary 40% of ocheduled days charges,. (7) , Age Rft IIBm_ liD Aq, 1/4 SERVICE NETWORK + IJOiV~?~BTiPOR% r y Must be pre- certified by Intracorp (1) Semi-private room 4' All necessary hospital services Outpatient Hospital. Services Surgory or Treatment $75 per visit, 100% Deductible plus 40% of scheduled charges, (7) Maternity Care R physicians Visits $15 per visit plus $50 Deductible plus 40% of copay for diagnostic schedule amount services over schedule In-Hospital Services $500 deductible, 100% $300 per admission deductible plus aon- network deductible plus 40% of scheduled charges. Newborn Nursery (2) No additional copay 40% of scheduled charges. Physicians Services Covered Not covered. for Newborn Emergency or Urgent Care emu'"` (In case of Accident or Sudden and Serious Illness) Hospital Emergency $75 per visit, 100% $75 per visit, 100% Room or Urgent Care Facility (3) Physician's Office $15 per visit plus $50 $15 per visit plus $50 copay for diagnostic copay for other services, services, if a:y. I NgTVaO1tIC Not3' 1>TETw0,RK sERVic~ - Merital Health/Substance Abuse (Serious mental illness or Substance abuse) Deductible plus 401, of !>15 per visit plus $50 copay for diagnostic schedule plus amount in physician's Office excess of schedule. sey;vicea Per admission the Hospital (3) $500 deductible, 100* deductible eciuotiale plus 40% of scheduled charges. " er visit plus $50 Deductible plus 40% of physical Therapy (4) $29 $15 p P for diagnostic scheduled charges. services. Not covered Family Planning Based can Service provided. infertility Services $15 peer visit phis $50 Not Covered copay for diagnostic services. visit plus $50 Deductible plus 40% of $15 per for diagnostic scheduled charges. Detection pistortioa CorrectiOll (5} copay of Body servians. Not Covered Drugs (6) $150 gee a ice1$15 Prescription copay, g oopay, brand Up to 100 days supply; Not covered Maintenance Drug's one CopaY Deductible plus 2096 x11 Other Eligible Services $1,000 $500 plus a $150 drug Annual Deductible deductible. $40% up to $6,000 plus e+ $20000 (not including amount in excess of per Coiasuzaaa $15 office visit copnys) diems & sahed"les. $ ltd Lifetime Maximumu $3~'L +Famil+~ Limit irr. three (3) times individual Willem' y 9 i Out-of-Service Area Residents For covered persons who reside outside service area (50-mile radius of City of Denton) plan of benefits is $500 deductible plus 80% of eligible charges up to a $2,000 out-of-pocket maximum, Important Notess 1. An additional $500 deductible will be applied if a hospital stay is not precartified by Intracorp. No benef:''zs are available for days which are not determined to be medically necessary. 2. No additional copayments are necessary while mother and child are confined at same time. 3. An additional $500 deductible will be applied if a hospital stay is not precertified by Integrated Behavioral Health (IBH), No benefits are available for the days which are not determined to be medically necessary, 4. Physical Therapy services are limited to 60 visits per medical aondition. 5. Up to $500 in benefits for this service per year. EXHIBIT V 11 Name of Finn; Phi14de.19_ha-_Am( rxican Life insurance in goy - Address: Address: 31211 IIuffalo ~,j? eed_w4_y Houston._Texas 77098-1.805 Telephone; S]13L 871_4819 2. Name of Principal; Mr._ao_senh p. Crowley. President, 3. ownership of Firm: Philadelphia Amerlc~n Life Insurance Company is a subsidiary of the- 5.5 billion- asset I.C.H. ~Qorati.on,_ an insurance hol.djp~_company with cor op rate office_in Louisville _jM, 4. Date Firm was First Fonred: Philadelphia American has teen successful_ly_ performing _ as rou insurer and -claims administrator since its original incorporation in 106 under the name of Philadelphia Life _I surance Comac The preseat name was edopted in 1983,..- 5. Other Locations (City and State) Philadelphia American has the followinq_c>ffiee throughout the United States: 1. Louisville (KX); 2. Racine (WI); 3. Houston (TX); 4. Waco (TX); 5. Sacramento (CA); 6. Agoura Hills (CA); 7. Rosemont (IL); 8. Baton Rouge (LA); G 9. Farmington, (CO) The company also maintains field sales offices in the following cities: I 1. Atlanta (GA); 2. Houston (TX); L 3. Dallas (TX); 4. Chicago (IL); E S. San Antonio (TX); 6. Santa Ana (CA); and 7. Sacramento (CA) 6. Location of Headquarters (City and State): is • bgodcaarter_ in Louisville Kentucky, i 1. Location of Claims Processing Office: Waco. Texas 8. Fidelity Bond $ Philadelphia P i-can's employees ar_e covered under the ICH Corporation's blanket }~4nd number.. 4Uih L 8 ~06, The govgXa e beriod is 1-31-92 ~0 7 3~ 2 s>3a t is v~ gn s for a 55.000.000 limit of liability. The ~I.ic i written by St. 1?ay1 Mercur~~nsurance Companv, (Submit Copy of Face Page of Policy or Certificate) 9, References: Please refer to the, Questionnaire portion of this proposal. PHILADELPHIA AMERICAN LIFE CUP] HcO,MIM11.1, a 4 ndaNo._--.._ AQOIIC(0Ii011I._.~}J~ ~I F_.... IkItG PHILADELPHIA AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE, COMPANY da~S P. O. BoK 2465 - 199 r 07C - l lain ~ LZ comPa~v Houston, Texas 77252 (70) 871.4600 December 1, 1992 Mr. Ike Ohl Human Resource Specialist, Benefits City of Denton 324 East McVJnney Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Ike: This letter is wriVen to bring two clerical errors that were present in your renewal bid for j group health insurance to your attention. First, we did not provide rates for the rest of the retiree groups, beKause there were no members in those groups. Second, in Exhibit n of the bid, there was a $526.73 amount shown for "Retiree under 65-Retiree and Family", This amount should have been shown for "Retiree under 65-Retiree and Spouse". Also, in the same Exhibit II, there was an amount of $189.72 shown for "Retirees 65 or Over-2 on Medicare + Family". This amount should have been shown for "Retirees 65 or Over-2 on Medicare", Please accept our apology for putting the figures in the wrong blanks, Should you have any questions, please contact me, Thank you. 7RCd II ahlfs, Jr. Account Executive JR:tp r 1 3 Agenda ltem_ CITY OF DENTON REQUEST FOR BID BID NO: 1442 Health Insurance Program Due: November 25, 1992 i?;Aa CITY OF DENTON as Request for Bid for Group Medical TABLE OF C~ O~ 8 Pace Background and General Information 2 Scope of Specifications and instructions • . . : 6 Plan Assumptions (Exhibit 1) . ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 7 Bid Submission Farm (Exhibit ii) • . . ' ' ' ' ' . 11 Current Schedule of Benefits 6 Proposed Schedule (Exhibit iii) ' . . 18 Plan Experience (Exhibit IV) • . ' ' ' 19 Carrier/Underwriter Profile (Exhibit V) . . ' ' ' . 20 Censue Data (Exhibit VI) . . . ' ' ' . I I AAAOOFFD y ~I 1 ~ontlaNa,. ~a-,~~ BACKGROUND AND GENERAL INFORMATION The City of Denton is a city of 68,000 population and was Incorporated in 1866. Denton is located approximate,.y 40 miles north of Dallas and Fort Worth, It sits at the apex of a triangle that encompasses the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area. Although it benefits from the forward thrust and continuous expansion of the largest Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area in the state, Denton and its economy stand proudly independent, The City of Denton has a work force of approximately 850 employees, The City has had an effective safety and risk management program since 1970, The services the City provide consist of law enforcement, fire safety, paramadice/rescue, refuse collection, sanitary landfill, electric, water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, animal control, parka/recreation, library and airport. In general, we are a full-service city however, there is no city hospital or rest home. Two major univerr+itlee University of North Texas and Texas Woman's University along with a fully accredited public school system, allow local citizens every educational advantage possible and a rich blend of cultures. The eastern and western branches of Interstate Highway 35 meet in Denton, making it conveniently accessible to everything in Dallas and Fort worth, Denton offers worlds of opportunities to the prospective developer, business person or industrialist, Texas Instruments has a plant here and other industries are expanding. Any questions regarding the City's current health plan or this bid should be should8betlirecteditotTomlShaw6at8(817) 3383-7100e concerning the bid submittal AAA00FFD - l - ,I Agenda Itom- SCOPE OF SPECIFICATIONS & INSTRUCTIONfI< The city will entertain proposals on fully Insured managed care plan basis. The specifications contained herein will encompiws e to rednnly oandcost,Network Plans. Since we are presently evaluating options gachieve this. We, in essence, urge seeking optional quotas to on plans health care coverage. innovative approaches The City of Denton is seeking an insurance policy/agreement to become effective January 1, 1993, far a minimum of one (1) year. The policy shall provide, if not the cancelled prior to December 31, 1993 in accordance est ifh he terms for the policy/agreement, bid submission form, and/or requor bidders, renewal of this policy for two (2) successive twelve (12) month periods, thereafter subject to the renegotiation of the terms of this policy, if City costwofhinsurance ducessity of ng eitherethedfirsthor company Insurance propos Manager and neeaalnaa ;ong an theagree, I second twelve (12) month successive period does not increase more than 308 an rea more the beatedrminat deIffinsurance comp any and City care Dunablewtoeagreeiinpwriting to o a mutually agreeable plan design and lnsuraneTloaat no later than seventy-five (75) days prior to the end of the preceding per. The City Is interes,_ed in a fully insured managed care proposal The instructions contained herein apply to all gectLonsl otherwise, each section can stanr alone, or be a part of a partial or total package. Although the City is interested in packaging these coverages, for a number of reasons, it is undaretood that all ons coverages cont.ainad within theri Texasll wnorebecause some ofrthe rated into sinc),s policy, r is allowing for the coverages do c, nnc iznd themselves to that procedure. The City possibility that nomo agencias or underwriters would prefer not, or be unable, another 1ter.natlvid which tifj clua~ rly fhenof{cial n to the City land thektaxpayers. fha city wL:.l also accept anti er~.our.ngs innovative and alternative methods of prieiny and eover•!;ge of rinks so long as they do not violate Texas lawl however, exceptionF must ''e noted and me•;4 in addition to the specifications, which should he adhared to for third purpose ui, proper comparison, and all such variations must be clearly detailed, including advantages claimed to be gained thereby. Please review the entire scope of specificat one ipnstrurtions, and the specification - package carefully before submitting qACoaflictc Setween,Raauast for Bid and aid Should a conflict arise between the terms and provisions of this request for bid and the bid of the insurance company (which includes insurance policies, insurance agreement, etc.) the terms and provisions of this request for 1 will prevail. tucontestability Provioions Are Inapplicable City and Ridders agree that if a conflict arises relating to an Interpretation and or meaning the terms and (requesandt agreement, the insurance e company ny ived etc.) such conflict will not be resolved inbtheacourts ineDenton Cobyntythe judicial parties, but will be resolved by Texas. Duty of Carrier sary t all in order for bids 'co be compared on an identical basis, itIs ere m tins aabout portions of the document, including requests for specific coverage, ratings, services, forms and general information regarding the carrier, be completed and adhered to. 2- AAAOOFFD rte. Scope of Specifications & Instructions Aganda ND, Carriers participating in thie process must guara Neri~al Lcat.i'(AfYI_on will be used in their ntee that itthese hou aodf_ts For purposes of comparpannenit tia important theta uotatione beaubmittediontthie bid form (see Exhibit II). Any amendments or LnnovatLona must be submitted by addendum to thLe specific package and so noted. Sample policies, including endorsements, must be eubmittod with al). quotations. Commitments in writing from underwriters and re-insurers are also required as a part of the quotations, Any carrier which is unable or unwilling to meet the upecificatione shall so state (with a full explanation) and detail the coverages affected, whether or not adversely, in a supplementary letter to be attached to the submitted quotation, specifically noted and made a part thereof, i Underwriters' ouatifirataoas All carriers must be licensed to do business in the State of Texas and maintain a SEST's Insurance Guide rating of at least A (excellent). Exhibit V must also be completed. Qaveat Although every effort. has been made to provide accurate and up-to-date information, companies supplying quotations should contact the City for any questions that you might: have, Contract Stipsulation Any carrier chosen by the city of Denton will be required to rover employees of the city that are currently covered regardless, 0fwhether theyiare actively ac work or not. The City is subject to the provisions OMNIBUS Budget Reconciliation Act of 1996 (COBRA os of the conform to this law. Proposals moat _ Admiai.strstiort The successful bidder will be required to perform all necessary administrative functions in order to effectively manage the benefit plans and to comply with prevailing laws and regulations. Theae functions include, but are not limited to, the issuing of booklets, Certificates of Insurance, I.D. cards and master policies as well as providing for claims auditing and generated experience reporting at least quarterl Processing, computer- forms, and conversion forme. All costs associa end ewithlthe t materials, claim visi of such services must be included in the rates and reflected within he oretention illustration. The City also desires repreeentacives from the selected carrier. I\ to be available to conduct large group meetings if deemed necessary, Criteria for Bid Selection The award of the contract will not be based on coat alone, The City will evaluate the bids on rates as well as the followings 1. Claims processing capabilities 2. Contractual requirement (i.e., billing etc,) 3. Ability or willingness to make a timely, accurate and inexpensive transition with current carrier, 4. Ability to service contracts, 5. Bidder's financial stability. 6. Ability to provide claims data in the forms necessary to track the performance of the plan. Notei Bidder should provide an explanation for all items giving as much information an poselble, including a transition plan samples of claims reports, and other information. AAAOOFFD -3- A \ Aoortla IVs,.... 7C~ scope of specifications & Instructions Ageldalte O- - 7. Please Provide your completed contract outlining your pro Times and Locatioiss for Filing Quotationo `~Jf Quotations shall be considered irrevocable for sixty (60) days, and the City of Denton reserves the right to accept or reject any or all quotations and waive any informalities in any quotation. Request for detailed specifications, lose experiences, and questions should be directed to Ike Obi, City of Denton at (817) 566-8340. All quotations must be submitted with two copies (in a sealed envelope, clearly marked "Insurance Quotations for the City of Denton, Texas") on or before November 25, 1992, at 2c00 p.m. tos Mr. Tom Shaw Purchasing Department Vervice Center 901 B Texas Street Denton, Texas 76201 r i AAAOOFFD -4- 9 'Y ko%Ua No The following exhibits and instrn,Ik3t(3_°%x- bid. tions are pertinent to the completion of this EXHIBITS INSTRUCTION/Com"NTS I. Plan Resumption See Exhibit Z TI• Bid Submission Form Please do nut submit your standard bid, rather simply complete the bid form. III. Schedule of Benefits Details of benefits provided under the current plan Exhibit III. IV. Plan Experience. V. Carrier/Underwriter Profiler Basic information on carrier and/or underwriter must be completed. VI. Census Data AAACOFFD 'S` 3 EXHIBIT I ASSUMPTION Agenda I alte _ 7 J 1. Plan Year January 1, 1993 - December 3 , 1993 2. Contract Multi-year contract as the City of Denton is interested in a long term ansociation with carrier. The City requires a rebid of its health insurance program every three years. 3. Plan Design Two Basic Plan Designs (Exhibit III) A. Network Provider B, Non-Network Provider miscellaneous provisions for exceptions such as services outside service areas, emergency service outside service areas. Bidders must agree to include the two local hospitals in the Network Provider List. A fully-insured proposal. 4. Funding Fully-insured managed care plan. The plan will be net of commission. 5. Annual Claims History See Exhibit VI. f AAAOOFFD -6- y 1 I EXHIBIT II N,J41111tANff.r, CITY OF DENTON Afl611i13I161f1 ~5 J`_,_„. BID SUBMISSION FORM -Jy FOR FULLY-INSURED Managed Care BID (1)t~9. _ e ay carrier/Vendors Dates Completed Byr (Name & Title) Phone Numbers ( ) 1. Premium Rate for the Health Plan, not of commissional R Monthly ost Active Current Benefits Prooosed Benefits a. Employee only $ $ b. Employee & Spouse $_Y $ C. Employee & Child $ d. Employee & Family $ $ e. How long are rates guaranteed? mo/yr mo/yr Retirees Under 65 a. Retiree only $ $ b. Retiree and Spouse $ - C. Retiree anu Children d. Retiree and Family $ Retirees 65.9 r Over Lgn Medicare) a. Retiree Only _ b. 2 on Medicare $ 8~ C. 1 on, 1 off $ d. 1 on, 1 off + Family e. 2 on + Family f. How long are retiree rates guaranteed? - mo/yr -mo/yr 2. Are there any other fees in addition to the Premium Rates? If yeL%, identify and state the amount. PURPOSE OUNT Identification Card $ Medical Conversion $ Large Claim Management $ Bank Reconciliation $ _ AAA06FFD -7 ~y 7 Exhibit Ti A!aendaNo Agenda ltent) 3. a. What claim payment software do you use? b. Where are your claims processed? 4. Is a software system or vendor change planned for the period 01/01/93- 12/31/93? If so, to what system/vendor? 5. Assuming that the contract for the City of Denton plan will be effective January 1, 1993, provide a detailed implementation plan for the transition on a separate sheet of paper, Be specific concerning your capabilities to load detailed coverage and claims history Information. 6. Claim payment software featuresi Which of the following features are inherent to your current claim payment software? Yes No a. Hard coded plan design - b. Direct eligibility interface C, Deductible applied and calculated d. Out-of-pocket applied and calculated _ e. Duplicate payment audit ` f. Pooled claim accounting g. Interface to pre-certification service 1 7. What percent of claims are subject g to Internal claim office audit? 8. What is your claims processing accuracy rate? a. Transaction h b. Dollar Value - 9. Please provide the most recent internal audit report (within the last year), verifying your claims processing accuracy levels. Yes No `sd 10. will your claim syei.am facilitate a future _ PPO plan design, eith„r as a per diem based, or reduced charge, of `nigher coinsurance percentage, etc.? Yaa ~d 11. can the City of Denl:on Human Resources Department access t'aeir claim files electronically and directly via an on-site modem? $One-Time §RecurrSr~q If so, what are costs (one-time and recurring?) AAAOOFFD -g- 4 d 3 Agnn~iaNo Exhibit II C#dC_ 11-'96 ~~$e !°/A utilization Reviewouc, billing structure and g/ 12. Do you offer the followrogided and describe Y roentioned~ i.e,: initial identify the servico: P the areas previously minimum fees, etc- estimated , monthly fees/employee or fees/eervic e, setup fees, per Service Setup EE'Mo. Femme-s-- Fe--e-~" HOSPITAL ATIO Pre-certification Reviews-~- Continued Stay Reviows+ Concurrent Stay Reviewss SURGER Second Surgical opinion Reviews' r outpatient SurgezY Reviews atanrsi:.MENT •r eur J Research of Catastrophic Cassel It AIDS Case Managements Mental Health Case - Management' gLp5p SEAVICLS, BL11 review & Claim Auditsr - DRG Validations' " Ancillary Service Evaluations: Analysis Reporter - - _ TOTAL FEES 13. Fund Balance Statementor (Recap of Check Re4 s showing fund balances with interest earned, when deposits were made, etc.) 14. Hospital Utilization Reporting (Frequency and bed days) and a list of 3 former client references, ears. 15, Please provide a list of 3 our aervlces within the last two y clients who have discontinued y etc, fOr all reements/contracts, sample specimen of all ag is a ted as lb. PtheaAbove lis -9- AAAOOFFD l ijentla No Exhibit II Ia~ondaNero`; ~S--I o statement is nOtrapplic able, mfor~~ r;J `b 17. Pleas provde if the an o audited recent f udi ted financial of C o i your firm. 18. If any insurance is quoted on a retention basis, please explain the the reserves the 11d disposition iaofdthehreserves upon for determining the amounts, and that contract. 15 Please explain COBRA administration offered by your organization and costs for any additional these 20. eras. es specified in this bid, ore will you o"unbundleeuthec services quoted? 21. Please provide your recommended plan designs based upon the network vs. non-network point of service option. f r AAAOOFFD -10- 4 EXHIBIT III CURRENT SCHEDULE OF BENEFITS AgeRdaI ty li_? CITY OF DENTON 130-•- SE VICE h9T_W_0_RjK Physician's Office visit $15 Pee visit Deductible pine 308 of schedule plus any amount over schedule, Preventive care Well Baby $15 per visit (Recommended Not covered Schedule) { Routine $15 per vis.tt Immunizations for Not covered ro children 2 and under Annual Health $15 per visit Assessment Not covered Employee/Covered SPouse 35 yearn or older. Includeat Cheat X-Ray, Urinalysis, ER(;, Blood testing, Well Woman Exam Annual (once every $15 per visit 12 months) Not covered Routine Vision, Speech, Searing Screening 0 through age 17 $15 per visit Not covered In-eospital services (1) No limits on $50 per day up to 10 medically necessary days $300 per admission days deductible plus deductible plus 301. Must be pro- (7) certified by Intracorp (1) Semi-private room All necessary hospital services AAAOOFFD -11- 1 Exhibit III SERV I E NETWORK (y~ON-NETWOR~ outpatient Hospital O Services Deductible plus 309 of Surgery or Treatment $50 Per visit eligible charges. (7) Maternity Care per visit Deductible plus 309 of Physicians Visits $15 p schedule plus any amount over schedule, in-Hospital Services days per day up to 10 admission $300 per plus deductible plus 30%of eligible charges, (7) Newborn Nursery (2) No additional copay 30% of eligible charges. Not covered. Physicians Services Covered for Newborn Emergency or Urgent cars (in case of Accident or sudden and Serious illness) Hospital Emergency $50 per visit $50 per visit Room or Urgent Care Facility (3) Physician's Office $15 per visit $15 per visit Meutal Health/Substance Abuse (Serious mental illness or Substance abuse) physician's Office $15 per visit Deductible plus 309 of schedule plus amount in ,y excess of schedule. In the Hospital $50 per day up to 10 d$300 er eductible Plusi30% of days eligible charges. (7) Physical Therapy (4) $15 per visit Deductible plus 309 of eligible charges. Based on Service Not covered Family Planning provided. infertility Services $15 Per visit Not covered per visit Deductible plus 309 of correction $15 pe eligible charges. ofDeteBody ction DiAstortionrtiou (5) ) Prescription Drugs (6) $100 drductiblej $3 Not covered copay, generic? $10 copay, brand AAA W FFD -12- 4 Exhibit III AAendaltem. '~7..._. SERVICE FTWORRE N.O)F TWORK 91/ Naintenaace Drugs Up to 100 days Supply; Not covered J Ps7 one copay 0 All Other Eligible Deductible plus 20% Services Annual Deductible* $250 plus a $100 drug $500 deductible Coins»rancs* $1,000 (not including 308 up to $5,000 plus office visit copAys) amount in excess of per diems & schedules. Lifetime Maximum* Unlimited Unlimited rf *Family Limit is three (3) times individual maximum. Out-of-Service Area Residents For covered persona who reside outside service area (50-mile radius of city of Denton) plan of benefits in $250 deductible plus 80% of eligible charges up to a $1,000 out-of-pocket maximum. Important Notes: 1. An additional $500 deductible will be applied if a hospital stay is not pre- certified by Intracorp. No benefits are available for days which are not determined to be medically necessary. 2. No additional copAymenta are necessary while mother and child are confined at same time. 3. If patient is admitted to Network Hospital from emergency room, $50 copay is waived. 4, Physical Therapy services are limited to 60 visits per medical condition. S. Up to $500 1,n benefits for thin service per year, 6. if your physician permits or orders a generic drug and you decide to purchase brand, the cost will be generic copay plus the entire difference price between generic and brand. 7. Eligible charge is the per diem or schedule offered by network hospital. Amounts in excess of that per diem or schedule do not apply to out-of-pocket- maximum. Network Providers are: Hcenltalnr Denton Regional Medical Center Denton MCA Community Hospital Phveicianq I Denton IPA North Texas Medical and Surg).cal AAAOOFFD -13- AaandaNo,-,A Exhibit III f1gOnQaIlpili P.~.. For services that cannot be performed at the hospitals llst~5d'Lnr/Si hhlw6P~(, hospital providers area !G C Harris Methodist Harris HEe Humana medical city Eligible services by non-network physicians affiliated with these facilities are paid after $250 deductible then 80%. This is not a contract, this is a brief description of your benefits. A booklet will be provided with more detail. e f AAAOOFFD -14- T I I I I IXHIBXT III PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF BENEFITS EFFECTIVE 01/01/91 [FJiO__.•.;~--~ CITY OF DENTON SARy_ r{CE N TW NON-NETWORK Physician's Office Visit $15 per visit plus $30 Deductible plus 40% of copay for diagnostic schedule plus any amount services. over schedule. Preventive Care Well Baby $15 per visit plus $50 Not covered. (Recommended copay for diagnostic Schedule) services. Routine $15 per visit plus $50 Not covered. Immunizations copay for diagnostic services. Annual Health $15 per visit plus $50 Not uoveved. Assessment copay for diagnostic services. Employee/Covered Spouse 35 years or older. Includeer Chest X-Ray, Urinalysis, EKG, Blood testing. Well Horan Exam Annual (once every $15 per visit plus $50 Not covered. 12 months) copay for diagnostic services. 43i'.'.1fI Routine Vision, speech, Hearing screening 0 through age 17 $15 per visit plus $50 Not covered. copay for diagnostic services. In-Htoepital services (1) No limits on $500 deductible, 100% $300 per admission medically necessary deductible plus the non- days network deductible plus 40%. (7) Must be pre- certified by Intracorp (1) Semi-private room All necessary hospital services AAAOOPFD 15 3 Exhibit III ACtof~a~fBm_ ~~_r~Ga 41" SE VI UTWORSC (}tN-31E1PW0 ~y Outpatient Hospital services surgery or Treatment $75 per visit, 1006 Deductiblaharges90% o eligible Maternity Care Physicians Visits $15 per visit plus $50 Deductible plus 406 of copay for diagnostic schedule plus any amount services, over schedule. In-Hospital services $500 deductible, 1006 $300 per admission deductible plus non- network deductible plus 40% of eligible charges. (7) Newborn Nureary (2) No additional copay. 40% of eligible charges. Physicians services covered Not covered, for Newborn Emergency or Urgent Care (Tn case of Accident or sudden and serl.oua .illness) Hospital Emergency $75 per visit, 1006 $75 per visit, 1006 Room or Urgent Care Facility (3) Physician's Office $16 per visit plus $50 $15 per visit plus $50 copay for diagnostic copay for other services. services, lf any. Mental Health/Substance y, Abuse (serious mental illness or substance abuse) Physician's Office $15 per visit plus $50 Deductible plus 406 of (3) copay for diagnostic schedule plus amount in services. excess of schedule. In the Hospital (3) $500 deductible, 1006 d$300 per eductible plus admission non- network plus 406 of eligible charges, Physical Therapy (4) $15 per visit plus $50 Deductible plus 406 of copay for diagnostic eligible charges. services, rarily Planning Based on service Not covered. provided. r infertility Services $15 per visit plus $50 Not covered. copay for diagnostic servicem. AAA00FFO 16- r f Exhibit III 11, Ito N~F~wonlc NON-NBTWf, MUC E ` Deductible plus & correction $15 per visit plus $50 408 of copay for diagnostic eligible charges. of body Distortion (5) services, $150 deductiblel $5 Not covered. Presariptioa Drugs (6) copay, generict $15 copay, brand. U to 100 days eupplyl Not covered. Maintenance Drugs one copay. Deductible plus 206 All other Eliyihl• Eervioes 500 plus a $150 drug $1,000 Annual Deductible $ deductible. $2,000 (not: including 40% up to $6,000 plus coi,isuranc• $15 office visit copay) amount in excess of per diems & schedules, $1M $1M Lifetisae Naxiauak h *Family Limit is three (3) times individual maximum- out-of-Service Area Residents For covered persons who reside outside service are (50-mile radius of City of Denton) plan of benefitn is $500 deductible plus BOB of eligible charges up to a $2,000 out-of-pocket maximum, important Notess 1. An additional $500 deductible will be applied if a hospital stay is not pre- certified by intracorp. No benefits are available for days which are not determined to be medically necessary. i 2. No additional eopayments are neeesary while m,ither and child are confined 1 yS., at same time, 34 An additional $500 deductible will be applied If a hospital stay is not pre-ed Be nef forttheedays whichrare nothavdeteioral lly ne eissary. available -17- y AAAOOPFr) ~J ~a] ~ondaNti.~_ yvl ' ~ b' ~Dontlalto~n ~ '~7~ W le r" EXHIBIT IV PLAN EXPERIENCE 4"U.; AAAOOFFD ti y h 4 A90fida Item- CITY OF DENTON PLAN EXPERIENCE EXHIBIT IV JANUARY THROUGH OCTOBER 1992 *ACTIVE EMPLOYEE RATE Coverage Employee Monthly Employees' City's Counts Premiums Cost Cost Employee Only 361 $175 $10 $166 Employee + Spouse 83 272 107 166 M Employee + Children 179 236 70 165 Employee + Family 184 340 175 165 807 * Call Ike Obi at (817) 666-8340 for Retiree Rates !fit h Preen ums h~ai~al aL ijns PrescrintiorJ A Jan $ 171,764 0 $ 4,096 Feb 202,728 41,119 89808 Mar 190,711 186,623 9,669 Apr 196,377 2290068 13,979 ' May 195,777 144,166 16,679 Jun 195,962 308,488 17,636 Jul 1941617 182,947 18,010 Aug 184,223 217,613 17,132 Sep 1869736 210,016 20,603 Oct 190,724 129,966 181000* TOTAL $199079909 419649,894 $ 144,612^ 7I O;~In _ ~ol rd 4~r. 11/12 lr D (Exhibit IV continued) HIGH CLAIMANT REPORT January Through October, 1992 Diagnosis/Prognosis Amount Paid Cancer - Major surgery is over $ 43,496 Breast Cancer - Had a mastectomy 410002 Blockage of Colon - Doing very well 39,539 Major problem with delivery - Alright now 38,206 Leg Injury - had surgery and back to work 37,698 Diagnosis information - not available 30,864 Diagnosis information - not Available 28,005 Heart Condition 26,360 Heart Condition, currently on disability 21,378 Heart Condition currently on disability 20,708 Tear in Rotator Cuff 180680 Diagnosis information - not available 171912 Maternity Expenses 17,857 Mental/Nervous - On-going 160764 Hip Replacement Surgery - on disability 16,624 planxp93,prn i I EXHIBIT V A1011da CARRIF'R/UNDERWRI'TER PROFILE aAaatlalfera__. Name of Firm Address 2. Tel. ~ Name of Principal 3. ownership of Firm 4. "ats Firm Was First Formed 51 Ot' or Location, - (City and state) 6• Location of Headquarters (City and State) 7. Location of Claims Processing office Fidelity Bond $ - (SUbmtt copy of Fa ps`g~ epo clioY or cart! ci at j' 9• References, S t i act e 2. A. - AAAOOppD -.19- FXHIBI,r v ANuodaNo...._ Agoncla CARRIER/UNDERWRITER PROFILE DAU 1. Name of Firm I Tel. Address 2, Name of principal _ 3, ownership of Firm 4, Date Firm Was First Formed 5, other Locations (City and State) 6. Location of Headquarters (City and Stats) 7, Location of Claims Processing Offlce B, Fidelity Bond S-_ (Submit Copy of Face ?age of P011cy or Certlfioate) 9. References$ C~tv/Skate Wnme of Coita Tell 2. 3 AAAOOPPD S I A0803 No Agenda ltem / s, Into 9 . ~~y yz EXHIBIT VI CENSUS DATA ;,y Li4 AAAOOFFD -20- t Wpm 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ m Y w ! z -00000000^-oaooooc-oo-oP000OOOOOOOOPOO- ~ ~~~~-•-ooo- 2 0000000•-a 000000._ 0 O-^ p .._..00•.__0„_-.. u a e ~ W LL OOOOD00000000000••00000000000--000000^00000000^-00000000-00000-Opp a a I I m N oo000O0oOOO000-00000ov0O000000"0000UOoo--.- 00000-0«0000-0000000000 A = U 0--0-0000000-0000^000000000^0000000«000000000000000000000-0000-00 W 1u 000.•0.._..^0O«O^o^000-.- N 0-^^^^0000••-.-^pp-0000-0000000-.--.. M 0 0000--00-0 O 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000o00o000o00o000000 w ¢ 00000000000000000000000600000OUOOOOOOOO00000000000000000000000000 Q a wI 00000000000000 P 0000000000000 o000000006 b O 00000006000000000000 b 0000 -0000000000 a 000000000 N O0 o 0000000000000NO000000000000000000tlO00000 07 O LL 00000000000000060 00 0000000000000006 0000 W V w NM~ONON--p»CJm^OiMOm 1 . . . . . .y.C r ' ' • •yy 0000y0000000000000006 1 NNNNNN fIwNaNNNNw NNMMM NNM pNNNMwNpyNNNyNV1N KNNN N1gNNK wIN4A 0 64 N N N N N w W NW N N N 00 2 y N 0000000000000 a 0000000 a 0000000000000000000600000 0000000000010 O Y 0000 O w 00 m 01 N O d N O m 00010 M 1O N O to cc0 04 WN00 m IO V000 Ol N m 000 Y It N 000 "a O O m m N N Ip 00 m N N(D ( Iwo 010 MOWWUNMm10MM»^ MVI-MOOMMMmOOOtM O It NOD- OM V TNm» LL w I tlh(ONhN NbYONm~O-m mlOmMmOhmOmmUIM^-N-dfOMhf010NtlmNM OON QI-..h MN1. 2 IO^dMmMh O'10'IMhNFO- Ofpp OION»N O 010pIN0 0 0 U 2 O M-N10-r Ol •t00010 N w O tly mN01Na O:M 1007 N f10hN0(OFM0f0 NhM [[pp WNf/fOF mtlh 01YNON0 M0701M NFm^IOM^WOIhNN- f d NI•IN-yyMNMNN-N»NNM^Nrr^77 N fr7Nm ;NdNN"OI^MMOMhhO1DN m.•h OfODh h01 F F U ViNN NNNWYINNNNNN1gNNWWy1N WN NM MNN•-NNNtt•9~M-IDNMN«..N« ♦♦MNN.•PP m^FNtlNN ANNI9WWNNNNNNVIN NNNNNHNNNNNWNNIRN NN NNNNNNNNN w NNNNNIY01010Y V M V Nm/M..Nl.0..m..lpNllllld N<YMY N10N VdIW NIOIIdtln OW lO-M M M10 fD0mFfO ly wm0 I ^O NOOO OO N.F.-OMF tl(QIO.V YI IO••-hh1tJ^NhNOlpFmgf010 NhM`\\\\\\••~\\NNWNNMNNNNN NI(IN u1 NONOOON J C \c\\\\\\\\\N ON^--N».. OOMN^^^Noo- 10gM7tlMhNNM000100fOhN000 M 000000YOONMM01N NN~Ib07 Q11\ l\0 ONNO-»..N ..O^,^107--0-N Nm N 0••^0000- mNNmN^ICON 0106NNr o I wwom 0\\\,~ O-O^00000^0000000000^-O^OOOOOOp1000-N-0f001Ym010N V O-O-.-..^p.. 00000-0-0 K ✓I !~llW!!!=!I~l~!!f!!!!!LL!a!!LL!!!!!LL4lZ!lLL ~l LLLLLLLL!!!4!W!w!!!!'~LL!!!!LLW ~ yy `UUWUWWWW U WUWNwuV2WW2WWWWWULLIL NWIUWWUIILLWYNNtai1 Yl •'22LLLLN NWWWW(OLL 4Rdda 4wwwWa.t IwwwdZW UWWwLLUWx tt NNO}O NONOINOOIN OhmNON10 UIOhMdN0lh M10^'pMMn-M 710E M01Mh0-.-dbryt00UYNm^ mWm OFIOFNONYmN10hNmMMYYtOfOYONNO1N dMf.dtlMM000i 01d000Jh IOmOYhflbdFdMMMY1D0 ! III OnMNNMMNOfOpiN Nhlmph 0010110 Nm^N10 ••1NN^mMMM YIDhmN •OMhOMMNMMNNMhdhOrAmtl 0) e C0 MN 140 S OOIDOQWWNNMNvW f0 v~ Ob" ONNNW6l00t0011p10o FOFN-fO-NOOf07 Oh Mq.• *MONO OppppY o"-ONmO4OOmOmN/O10tl V1 O! -IDMYYtltl10 M10MMNtlN O('110YmN0NmNppppO CIPN MYIO'ON» IONmL11N0f0YMY07 Nmpppp N4mwovN O MtlOi pIM01.0100^ YI IOdNd-10tlMNyyMtlM VIMC7 MfINhFYMM^10mdh O.M YM^NYIN NIO IO N mao-0 VOLONONhYh00tl NMIMOOM07-00 ^dmAMOINNYN h 0 MMd 1010 fD 0110 IDh hf0mm0007000 MIM d 1010 p~Qp 1I0p NN~fIN 01000 V110Y `W m010100«.-NMtlYddNN(0 Ip 01010 WIp Nhhhnlq. Fm O0W m07W T01 ^ •'-NNNNN(V fINNNNNCINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN m ^NMtlN10Fmm-------^Mm0^fIMYN1DF m010-NM C1/l i0 f.M010-NMdNIOhm010-NMYNIOh O NNNNNNNNNNMMMMMMMMMMd Y dd q dY YYYN10 N010u1NNNV110 f01N01M0ww 4 3 CITY Of OFNiON - FEBRIIAIIY 1992 913 WLONI.fiDAY, NOVCMUEN 1t, 1!792 1 I WNIC CENSUS (4400 REPOlill 0175 10NUMBFIf COV SEx 81RIHDIE ANN PAY LIFC_AMI CC CH SP FA MU) NM LIFE 1 3109105 NM M 07/05/21 X101400, Do $0.00 0 O 0 O 0 1 2 4600272 CII M 03/04/66 $31,761.60 $32,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 3 19363669 CII M 00/10/64 $22,860.00 $23,000,00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 4 19403370 EE M 02/16/6136,506.60 536,000.00 1 0 0 0 I 0 1 6 33402125 CH F 03106162 $21,766.80 $22,000.00 0 1 O U 1 O I 8 30487200 CE M 09109/64 $19,760.00 $20,000.00 I 0 0 0 1 O i 7 41463258 EE M 04103/65 $44,262.40 $45,000.00 I 0 0 0 1 0 8 68623848 EE M 10/15/61 $30,660.20 $31,000,00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 9 6032526ti EE M 10/17/41 $20,488.00 $21,000.00 1 O 0 0 I 0 1 10 60689860 NA M 06/11/49 %3U,062, 40 $40,000.00 0 0 0 0 0 i 1 II 61320269 N', r 03/10/39 $20,269.20 $21,000.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 12 66(144672 F1 M 03/2314B $22,860.00 $23,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 13 68666320 1 M 08/07/61 $i8,636.80 519,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 14 71481287 [ M 12/24/48 570,113.60 $21,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 In 76244736 S,' M 01108/32 518,616.00 $10,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 16 81668636 EE M 12/06/61 $22,860.00 $23,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 17 84600740 FA M 09/02/52 520,161.60 $30,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 18 BB426042 CH M 10/26/60 335,484.80 $36,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 19 86861968 NM M 00/06/69 $10,337.60 $0.00 0 0 u 0 0 1 0 20 87440680 EE M 08/21/64 $28,683.20 $29,000 00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 21 100185546 EE M O6/II/2B $31.304.00 $32,000,00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 22 10682'207 NM F OU11'1163 $21,777.60 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 u 23 107427853 EE M 08/17/48 $34,064.80 $35,000,00 1 0 U 0 1 0 1 24 124302154 EE F 11/28/30 $15,963.60 $15,000.00 t 0 0 0 1 0 1 25 137622292 EE M 08/11/67 $26,396.20 $27,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 36 146465659 EE M O6/t2/53 $31,761,60 $.32,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 27 160381147 EE F 02/07/56 5520,259.20 $21,000400 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 28 164460633 CII M 06106154 $34,736.00 $36,000,00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 29 16938BB76 FA M 06/30/45 $39,416,00 $40,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 30 195607141 FA M 01/20108 $20,113.60 521,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 31 193320840 SP M 04/17/43 $15,BU3.60 $16,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 32 194387333 EE M OB/18/47 16,313.60 $26,000.'0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 33 200302333 EE F 02/14/39 14,248,00 x16,001. 1 0 0 0 1 0 t 34 209321307 EL F 09/28/44 22,880.00 $23,000 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 36 210208401 EE M 10106/29 $22,880.00 $23,000 .J I 0 0 0 1 0 1 36 213721093 CH M In/02164 $21,278.40 $22,-00.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 37 229138794 FA M 07/17/57 $39,083.20 $40,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 I 38 230740840 EC M 12/03/64 $71,761.60 $32,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 39 240450207 NM F 07/26/69 13,620.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 40 241368103 SP M 09/24/.9 63,044.80 $04,000,00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 41 244351689 SP M 01/08/60 20862.40 $$21,000,00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 42 248110373 SP F 04/14/66 $33,,768,40 134,000,00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 43 288667767 EE F 01/14140 127,331.20 $28,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 44 259823080 NM F 08/13/47 $17,680.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 45 262404301 NM F 02/27/73 10,608.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 46 262761341 FA M 08/12/61 26,264.68 $29,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 47 262954274 FA M 06102/62 12,729.60 $16,000,00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 48 264969326 SP M 12/13/64 20,312.00 $27,000,00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 40 266400362 NM F 06/30/17 J 11,856.00 y16,000.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 80 286342248 SP M 10/tO/20 47,8BI.B0 £48,000.00 0 0 I 0 I n I J 61 267130670 EF. F 10/20/64 30,008 80 $31,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 I B2 20B640:140 EE M 1010/65 $26,390.20 $27,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 I 1 63 270888734 EE F 11/20/66 $20,268.20 $71,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 I ]y ^ 64 271824032 EE M 06/28/61 $17.721.00 $18,060.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 I':7 Lt.lj 65 273288738 SP M 11107/32 $47,681.00 $46,000.00 O 0 1 0 1 0 1 1. Be 273690041 FA M 10/IB/68 $19,177.60 $201000.oo 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 27 B7 274641867 NM M 011/20/67 $28,083,20 $29,000.00 0 0 0 0 u I I 0) BB 278621800 CH M 09/30:63 $27,045,84 x31,000.00 0 1 0 O 1 0 1 69 282203860 EE F 04/10/29 $$$$10,177.60 $20,000.00 0 D 0 I 0 1 g 60 286685906 EE M 06/28/66 21,flII0.40 $22,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 I 8l 298503482 EE M 06/08/60 27,946,94 $31,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 I i 02 288686100 FA M 10/18/68 12,729,60 y10,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 I 63 289982029 CI1 M 02/02/67 74,802.40 $26,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 O I V V - 64 290664168 LE F 11/22168 10,963.60 $16,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 60 291441852 NM f' 01/23/116 $25,105.60 $26,000.00 0 0 0 U 0 1 1 ^ Y t i CI IY OF OENTON - FEBRUARY 1992 11; IJ WIONI-SOAY, NJoVEMUE6 II, 1992 2 \ WNIC CENSUS (4400 NEPO61) Oils IONUMBE6 Gov SEX 61RTIM IE ANN PAY E1 FE AMT EE C11 SP FA MEO NM 1, IFE 1 66 286449132 FA M 07/04/(9 $74,617, G0 $150,000 00 0 0 0 I 1 0 67 296623558 EE M 01/21/6? $22,060.00 $23,000,00 1 0 0 0 1 1 68 297823992 EE M 06/26/69 $12,729,60 $15,000.00 1 0 O 0 1 0 1 6 60 299306916 EE M 07/04/36 $201363,20 $21,000.00 1 0 0 p 0 1 70 900648961 CH M 06/16/54 $20,737.60 $71,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 71 306543119 FA M 02/01/49 $26:105.60 $26,000,00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 72 306726130 EE M 02/04/F1 $16,636.00 $17,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 p 73 30760061t 011 M 09/06/61 $77,747.20 $7B,00000 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 74 308621345 EE M 01/16/65 $16,903.60 $17,000.00 1 0 0 0 I 1 75 318323027 EE F 04124140 $26,1J6.60 $26,000.00 1 0 O 0 1 O 1 76 319442638 NM M OB/10/19 $9,494,80 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0) 77 920607060 CH F 03/17/61 $16,724,110 $16,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 78 322467034 NM F 03/30152 $9,464.00 $0,00 0 O 0 0 0 1 0 79 327502041 CH M 08/18/64 $31,612.00 $32,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 80 334708760 CH F 12/17/65 $14,436.20 $16,000.00 O 1 0 0 I el 336364160 EE M 01/27/43 $30,763,20 $31,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 82 337564628 EE M 07/11/05 t23,276,20 $24,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 83 338367612 NM F 09/12/42 $12,684.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 84 344884186 EE F 06/21/62 $28,646,40 $26,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 BS 346380646 CIA M 04/0 R/47 $62,852.80 $53,000,00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 86 346628631 CH M 07/24/58 $26,264.68 $20,000.00 0 1 0 0 87 347484624 FA M 09/02/53 $64,001.60 $120,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 88 349641119 SP F 07/28/63 $24,107.20 $25,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 0 89 364323883 SP M 08/18/40 $62,666,60 $63,000.00 0 0 1 p 1 90 365749976 EF M 03/21/71 $IC,724.80 $16,000,00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 91 3664407213 NM F 03/03/Bo $26,106.60 $26,000.00 0 0 p 0 0 o 92 360468418 CH M 12/06180 533,402,72 $371000.00 0 1 0 0 93 367628228 FA F 03104166 $36.2761.80 $36,000.06 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 64 3594008H4 CH M 01/07/60 $26,166.40 27,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 95 368676800 CN M 12/01/00 $21,590.40 $22,000,00 0 1 0 0 96 370746367 CH M 12/16/59 $31,304.00 $:12,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 97 371842585 FA M 01116/65 $91,612.00 $32,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 98 372493886 011 M 03/03/46 $28,683.20 $20,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 99 379640850 FE M 12/14/53 $28,683,20 29 000.00 1 0 O 0 1 100 380748886 EE M 05/26/61 f.31:304.()a 32,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 101 381468980 EE F 02124/46 $39,490.20 $40,000,00 1 0 O 0 102 386682306 FA M 07/04/87 $31,304.00 $32,000,00 0 0 0 1 1 0 103 389480080 FA M 04/16/48 $64,697.60 $170,000.00 0 0 0 1 0 1 { ` 104 389688258 NM F 10/14/60 $31,304.00 $32,000.00 0 0 0 0 v I 1 106 39480321t NM F 09/10/64 16870.40 $0.00 0 0 0 0 p 1 1 106 397660487 FF M 07/21/60 $43,038,20 $44,000.00 1 0 0 0 I 107 3993463;6 EE F 03104138 s17, goo 80 $18,000.00 1 0 U 0 I 0 1 1 108 400966209 EE M 07/07/89 $31,761.60 $32,000.00 1 0 0 0 100 40188t709 EE M 01/25/139 $2H,68a,20 $29,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 110 408684126 FA M 11/22141 66,060.00 $134.000,00 0 0 0 t 1 0 111 406928664 CH M 10126/62 $19,177,60 $20,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 112 408961216 FA M 06/12/56 $28,683.20 5$20,000,00 0 0 0 1 113 409418964 EE F 04/13/67 $11,386.80 $I6, 000 RO 1 0 0 0 0 1 - 114 410004061 EE F 02111166 j26,108,60 $26,000.00 1 0 0 0 I 0 I 118 412249218 NM M 11/05/26 $10,337.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 R 116 414480007 NM F 01/10/71 510,890.20 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 U 117 422204070 NM F 00/11/24 $16,640,00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 118 426046078 CN M 02/23/47 $62,774.40 $126,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 IIg 426982221 EE M 09103/47 $39,124.80 $40,000.00 1 0 0 U 1 0 1 f 120 427020094 NM M 07/22165 $21,777 AO $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 J 121 427007946 C11 F 04/19/63 $17,867.2: $1R, 000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1b 122 427312076 CH F 00/06/63 $19,177.60 $20,000,00 0 1 O U 0 I m 123 427682422 CH M 06/07/30 $39,146.80 $40,000,00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 124 427947061 CI{ M 08/26148 131,761.00 $32,000,00 U 1 0 0 126 426254167 CH F 00/22161 $22,401,60 $23,000,00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 128 430880142 EE M O8/12/4B $28,646,4U $20,000,00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 \ 127 431086836 FA M 11/28/53 S$28, 683,20 $29,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 128 431235020 CII F 10/12/67 $1A, 696, 20 $19,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1213 431289265 NM F 01/18/68 $$12,771.20 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 130 431464910 SP M 11/14(30 $16,031 .40 $10,000,00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 ^ r^ 1 o V ` "1 ? y 11392 3 H -.13 Wf UNf. SOAY. N11VE M8F 11 I1, CIIY OF OENIUN - FfHI7U Alit 1997 LIFE WNIC CFIJSUS 14606 f1EpUil1) FA MFD NM t_ If E_AMI EE C11 SP 1 0 1 CUV SE A RI F1 IHI)TE ANN_PAY 0 0 1 0 0 ORS IDNUM13fR 532,000.00 0 1 31,304.00 $0.00 ~ 0 p 0 1 1 0 I 0 I 1 0 ' N511 IA p6/19/66 $16,640.00 10,000.00 0 0 0 131 131724621 NIA F 04/03/33 $19,1/l.60 524,000.00 0 1 432119818 F b23.BUB.20 $0,00 0 0 0 0 1 132 I 133 432844441 EE µ 11/19/58 p 0 0 1 0 1 134 434021937 FA F 03/17!71 $10,608.00 2{,000.00 1 0 0 1 0 135 434358043 NM F 01/28/60 $26,805.60 $26,000.00 0 1 0 O 136 435253961 EE M 06124/62 $11,926.00 532,0$0.00 0 0 0 0 1 0 O 436283621 CH M Io/04/53 $20,BOU 00 O 0 0 137 11/04/132 $30,000.00 0 p 0 0 1 I 138 4389OB06B NM IA $26 17,000.00 1 1 139 439080311 µ 06/11/63 ,161 .60 1 0 O ! EE 08/12/27 $IS'.80 516.000.00 0 U 0 p 0 0 I 140 419926244 161fi56 1 0 0 0 1 F 0020//1066/!667 4 $1.1,786.00 $10, 000000..0000 0 0 0 $41 440221061 IIM EE IF 1 142 440700690 F 04 $ /16/66 $29,1431.00 5$'3506, 0 a I 440700780 OH M ,000.00 1 0 0 0 0 1 143 0 I 1{4 440708272 38,868.80 $0.00 0 0 1 0 M 80/10/86 $$•10,504.00 $36,000,00 0 I 1 0 U 0 1 146 441327968 EE µ 16,276.80 20,000.00 0 0 I 146 441685974 NM M 11/28154 0 1 0 1 147 441620238 EE µ 04/06/68 $'2 8 , 121 , 430 6a n'000.00 1 00 0 p 1 0 441626033 EL M 01/02/87 $33,684.40 0 1 1 0 1 148 149 4417874131 EE $0/01/38 $26,380.40 $29,000 00 UO 00 1 0 0 10 0 F 11/02/60 $26,284 .06 36,000.00 Q. 160 442368996 EE M $0.00 0 0 p 0 1 µ OB/1;1/64 $38,484.80 I 161 442426660 SP 0 1 O f 01/26/70 $31,491.20 $'52,000.00 1 152 442601017 FA 0 0 1 8 0 IB3 442760598 NM M 02/01/00 083,20 $23,000.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 40 $213, 20,000.00 1 0 0 I p 03/02/ 184 4427/36616 EE µ $ 158 443423660 SP F 07109/38 19,1'17.60 $ $0,00 0 0 0 0 O 1 0 1 EIR 10/76/69 $$0,60B.00 92,000.00 l 166 443425293 1 M 04/21l3fi $31,304.00 $d0, 000.00 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 167 44370300E NM $29,000.00 1 O 1 0 0 1 p 1 1 1 168 444320114 EE M 10/22/89 $213; gas AO $20 000.00 0 p 0 0 1 159 444486266 fE F 0 I E£ 10/10/66 22,000,00 I 0 160 444023866 µ 03!19166 19 ,6,1.20 1 0 444628291 CH F 21,132.80 $ 0 0 1 08/04/86{7 257.60 $48,000.00 1 0 0 1 n 1 181 11!01162 21,000.00 0 0 0 0 1 O Ig2 444640629 EE µ 0,113.60 $32,000.00 i 0 0 I 0 I 163 444760723 EE M 3 11/t UA9 $31,701,60 $28,000.00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 164 4,113487770 CN f 9/O1/133 $26,106.80 $71,000.00 0 1 166 446849701 G£ µ 0 I 0 1 12/19/66 120,289. 2U $31,000,00 1 1 0 1 0 I 17 446681"0 OFI M 09109/B7 $27,946.84 0 I O 0 1667 448581230 EF .60 $14,248.00 $SIG,000.00 0 0 0 1 166 445607860 F 13/ 16/ 32,000.00 0 0 1 1 1 111 {46682006 C11 M fl/12 /,33 $31,304.00 .f{,000.00 0 1 0 0 I 0 1 4 1 .0 1 169 70 448347466 SP M 12/17/46 $33'014.40 $20,000.00 8 0 O I w 4464111478 EE µ 03/01/86 51y', 283,20 $Is, 000,00 0 1 0 1 0 17f 4466839813 1JM M 07!18167 $17,763420 $fG,000•00 0 I 0 0 1 0 1 172 446690600 EE M 11/05/615 $22,000,00 0 0 0 CH 12/06/64 $21,K90.40 $21,000.00 1 0 p 0 1 0 1 cH a2,ooo.o0 0 0 0 0 0 174 446742944 M 10/07/51 520,082.00 I 1 178 446742874 EE µ 1 0 0 0 1 11/00/39 531,304.00 1 176 447628709 EE M 03!11/413 $73,199.40 $148,0$$0.p0 0 0 0 1 1 117 446386176 F OB/18/6B E1 166'640.00 $16,000.00 0 0 1 0 V 1 178 44/3482304 Et 17,000.00 1 0 61 $,98 .1.60 1 178 448043598 NM M 03/30/ 18,08400 b 0 0 0 1 0 1 449182289 fA 10/15/87 $11 120 18,000.00 0 1 166 !04 .00 a2, 000,00 0 0 1 I 0 1 IV x' µ 04108/131 1,304, 00 32,000.00 1 0 0 2 IB1 840186418 EE F p O CD rp $92 449102903 Ef µ 0'1/06/80 1,31 I CH 01/14/69 ,761.60 45,000 .00 I 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 193 1 44919/33098 M 11/14 /63 12,729.60 ,000.00 1 0 0 8272502 EE 1 184 44449296125 M. 10/16/63 $10 392,00 $16,000.00 1 0 U isli EE 0 1 0 I i 06115159 $ 0 0 0 1 0 1 ct, 1 448312620 E EE F 526,39566,20 $$27,000.00 1 97 449319960 F. M 10/18/sl $ 93,000,00 0 0 1 449937763 EE 1 0')/06/27 06 ,,4.00 12013 ,000 . 00 0 0 0 1 p 0 5 I 1 IBB 07123/61 $28163,20 15,000.00 I I 0 0 189 44934tl73 FA M 13,48E .AD 2,000.00 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 p 190 449359588 M 06/15/69 1 1 £h M 10/16/61 ,683.20 $0.00 1 0 0 0 I 0 I 191 449370383 08/1 $28 2/70 $40,609.00 29,000.00 1 1 0 0 192 ,264.68 $20 449371108 CII f o3/2A/s4 $26 $22 , 000.00 0 193 449437016 NM M 07 E21, 290.20 104 448472887 611 µ 10/1'1/ C ~M ul 195 4,100143261 1 O~ ' ~ 11 / CITY OF OENTON - FEBRUARY 1992 13:13 WCONIPWAY, NOVEMNfR 11, 1992 4 WNIC CENSUS (4400 REPOH[) OBS 1ONUMBFA COV SE IT 1318 T11O7E ANN-PAY LIFF_AMT 1'. F. CH SP FA M[10 NM L I f I 195 449606132 SP M 02/22/32 $28,693.20 $29,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 197 449862901 EE M 02/10/37 $17,721.60 $16,000.00 1 0 O 0 1 0 1 198 449759422 NM F O6/20/70 $[0,608.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 199 449832693 EE M 07/213/71 $16,953,60 $16,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 200 449000010 EI.. M 07119/60 $27, 94B B4 $31,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 O 1 201 449901968 CH F II/24/,I'/ $24.018.40 $25,000.00 0 I o 0 1 0 1 202 449808840 EE M 03117182 $27,846.84 $31,000,00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 203 449924951 EE' M 10114149 $26,264.68 $29,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 204 449943483 FA F 09/07/80 $16,566.80 $17,000.00 O 0 0 1 I 205 449946431 NM F 01/30/51 $16,666 80 $1b,000.06 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 206 449046866 EE F 08/06/47 $18,632.80 $19,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 207 449961943 CH M 10/13/54 $18,552.00 $20,000.00 O 1 0 0 1 0 1 208 449982063 EE M 08/11/60 $21,599. 2 60 $22,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 08 450094358 FA M 02/09/fi7 $21,d69. 24 $24,000.00 0 0 0 I 1 0 1 210 450089098 FA M 12/26/52 $31,'161.60 $32,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 211 460293430 CH F 09/17/61 $31,491.20 $12,000.00 0 1 O 0 1 0 1 212 460293720 FA M OB/06/66 $26,500.80 $26.000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 213 460294124 FA M 11/16/61 $24,066.00 $26,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 214 480364866 FA M 08/25/62 $23,961.60 $24,000.00 0 0 0 I 1 0 1 216 450356834 FA M 01110/00 $26,396,20 $27,000.00 0 0 0 1 ! 0 1 216 450371419 EE M 01/16/63 $19,062.80 $20,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 217 450390301 NM M 10/14/69 $10,337.60 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 218 450391691 FA M 02/16/64 $27,747.20 $2H,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 219 460424259 NM M 10/06/29 $9,484.130 $0.00 0 O 0 0 0 1 0 220 460476221 SP M 06102/66 $23,276.20 $24,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 221 460476458 EE F 11/25/63 $17,388.90 $18,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 222 460530245 NM M 10/23/68 $10,808.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 223 460661184 SP M 07/10/40 $62,666,60 $63,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 0 I 224 450588142 NM M 07/12/36 $12,004,80 $0.00 0 0 O 0 0 I 226 460593006 SP M 10111/68 $21,028.80 $21,000.60 0 0 1 0 1 0 226 460640698 SP M 03/31/40 $26,648.40 $26,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 227 480640903 SP M 07/28142 $43,74'1,40 y44,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 228 460642956 EE M 01/12142 $20,892.00 $21,000,00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 2.29 450646698 FA M 09114/44 $26,264.69 $29,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 230 460671169 NM M 01/02/R9 510,400.00 50,00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 231 460079813 EE F 12/12/67 511,377.60 $16,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 232 450698237 NM F 10/22173 511,564.80 $16,000.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 233 460739644 MM M 08/11171 $10,606.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 1 234 460743486 EE M 07/21/47 $23,276,20 $24,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 236 460744107 CH M 00115148 $30,146,60 $40,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 236 460744792 EF M 11/18146 $27,945,94 91,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 237 460746226 CH M 07/03/47 $32,7113,40 33,000.00 0 I O 0 0 I 238 450802496 FA M 07/07/60 2'/,946.64 $31,000,00 O O 0 1 1 0 1 239 460880046 FA M 04/06/49 21,690.40 $22,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 2A0 460966906 EE M 09/20/53 14,310.40 y16,000,00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 241 460067880 EE M 07/14/58 $36,484.00 $36,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 242 480988699 CH M 07/27/63 $65,286.40 $111,000400 0 1 0 O 243 4BOBB2674 FA M 00/06/66 $22,214.40 $23,000,00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 244 460983218 NM M 12/15/63 $9,464.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 246 480984174 C11 M 10/16/131 $36,390.80 $36,000,00 0 1 0 0 1 O 1 246 460987826 IA M O9/06/62 $26,204,68 $20,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 I 247 460692902 NM M 11/27/67 $22,880.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 b 1 0 248 451020602 CH M 11/28/62 $28,083.20 $290000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 249 461044136 SP F 06130189 $16,018.40 $17,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 260 461112689 FA M 11/04/65 $26,646.40 $26,000.00 O 0 0 1 1 0 1 <<~ E IC] 261 451112763 NM F 03/29/55 $19,640.00 tU W 262 461113066 all M 09/13/56 $28,683.20 $'29,000.00 0 1 0 0 I 0 1 Ib L1. 253 461162616 CH F 01/24/66 $20,692.00 $21,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 I w 264 451165857 CH M 06/11/60 $27,747.20 $28,000.00 0 I O O 1 0 288 461 167760 EE M 05114/71 $21,469,24 $24,000.00 1 0 0 O I 0 286 481173252 EE F 06/17/96 $19,[77.80 $20,000.00 1 0 0 0 T.] 267 451232219 EE F 12/26/60 $24,918,40 $2H,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 I 1 268 461319807 EE M 04/17/65 5$17,908,90 $$18,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 I 269 461371706 CH F 09/07/62 $20, 030, 40 $21,000.00 0 1 0 al 1 0 ! V 260 461378138 CII M 07/24/71 $16,9[33.60 $16,000.00 0 I 0 0 I 0 3 3 3 r",~l i C3IY (]I' U(. NEON - FE t3MIJAHY 10112 OHS IDNUMBEM COV WNI C; CENSUS 4400 i 13WEONL%DAY, SEN ( Bli 1~(1lll NDVI-ME3ER II, 1 r 261 451306266 S11 8rA 1110 f@ ANN-,MAY 7!)2 1 252 16 4614fi083B FA F 041/26/61 LIF E_AM) 7 FL CH 4 461461166 E M 013/0f/31 $20,260,20 $2!,000,00 FA MFU LIFE NM 64 ,161462183 E F 0:1/15/33 b20, 1192, 00 21 , 000 . 00 0 O I 768 4614766 f2 E[ M 07/16/29 $21766.80 $ a 0 0 1 72 2766 461486 M 522, $22,000,00 0 2,67 461496'!666 NM M 0S/01$/70 $W 040 F $23 000.00 ' 0 p 0 I 0 1 68 4115811A8 CH F 02//20/64 14/66 $ 17 0,867.20 $Ig, 000 00 7 69 0 0 0 OO U 0 1 270 4fi 1671163 CH OR/)1/66 $16,000.00 0 0 I 1 '170 451683271 IM 03/23/66 $15, 903. Go $16, 000 .00 0 0 0 0 27 1 0 1 271 4616'/4854 EE ir/O6 / 61 E1 G, 963,60 $16,000.00 0 1 q 0 27 O 1 O 2 461679002 NM F 06/16/68 $13,852,80 $1, 000, 00 0 1 0 0 I 1 3 45]581870 M FA 08/20/73 $23, B99, 20 6 $2d, 000, 00 0 1 0 0 0 1 274 41$1740 rR7 FA M 07/22/43 $9'7Gr.0o I 0 1 0 r 0 276 461770314 NM F 07413 $4A,p61.10 $49,00$0. oo 0.00 0 0 p 0 r 0 276 0 1 277 461780:342 FEEA F 08/28/70 $13'077.00 $16,000, 0 0 0 I 278 46 178116f FA M 12/26/48 $16,640 .00 00 1 1 I 279 41$1782766 M 03/27/64 fb~8,636.H0 $26,000.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 28 r 461783408 EE 0[i/Ofi/47 $33,402.71 $19 000.00 I 0 0 i 0 1 0 46 17 9 O 280 7826 EE 24 10/18/60 $37,000.00 0 0 I 46171A 360 FA M 09/16/50 $25,106.60 $26.000.00 0 0 0 0 1 0 283 4618001fi0 EE F M 03/17/49 $53239 41I.20 $90,000.00 1 0 0 1 1 0 ,151800420 C3{ 04/11/62 , 402,72 537,000.00 1 0 1 284 48184263.1 Et F 17/17/60 b72,401.60 0 p I p $23,000,00 0 O 0 0 I rl I 218 48184421(; FA M 00/03/4 7 $17,90£.80 ,000.00 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 268 4618/161 EE M 11/26/84 $31 $18 ,7614 60 $32,000,00 0 1 0 0 1 267 461/8120 7 6 M 08/01/47 $31.304.00 $32. 00 1 0 0 0 0 I 2AH 461969946 p(FA. 1, '•/10/49 $20,(;92.00 $ , 000 21 000.00 0 0 0 I 0 1 218 46202g IOo FA F 08/27/51 516'963. Fi0 $16,000, 1 r r 291 452063823 CN M 11/18/66 %17,6RO,o0 00 i 0 0 U ] 0 1 482086779 Ec F 01/01/63 $26- f66, 40 $27,000.00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 297 42067423 fit M 09/14/64 $20,692.00 529,000.00 00 0 0 0 293 29d 4662068486 FA M 12/0fi/56 b21,0 f 462069666 M f0/{p/68 $26,264,68 $21 ,!00.00 1 0 0 00 1 n 296 45206962 C11 0 FA M 03/23/66 $38,,109, 20 $29,000.06 1 0 0 0 0 1 ,.F 206 482111078 FA 11/30/68 $40,000.00 U 297 482f67200 NM F 12/19/1$4 $20, I13.G0 $21,000. 0 0 r O 1 1 0 1 2BB 462210700 CH M 02/16/18 520,217.60 , 000.00 0 p 0 0 I 0 290 48226331 F $21 04/01/07 $9.464.00 0 0 1 1 300 1 452402401) 6 EE NM F 121 ro/66 $20,612.80 $21,0000.00 .00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 301 462472fi10 NM M lE/09/32 $12,792,00 0 I 0 0 302 492893564 EE M 06/30/64 $26,646,40 ~;26.000~00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 303 46249UDtif M OB $16,640.00 0 1 304 EE %2!3/66 I 4525220f3 M 07 $26,106.60 %0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 306 4626284OF EE M 06/0!1/34 $26,126.40 000.(x0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 307 46272056 EE F 11/2, $26,646, d0 b7 266 ,000.00 1 0 U 0 1 0 0 308 4826672160 FA M /37 I6 017, 5p 16,000,00 0 0 O 0 1 0 1 10/11/42 301) 452773282 FA M 06/18/6$ $18,283,20 $17,000,00 j 0 0 0 1 310 42773283 IIM M 06/30/47 519,000,00 0 1 0 4 662 776 0 311 116 NM F 04/20/73 $33, 4 rig, 72 $87,000.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 O 1 462826378 SP F 03/26 /li9 10,337,60 0 p 312 1 1 1 462861880 F6 M 09/14/,1912,702,00 10 , 00 0 p 0 1 I p ) 33114 :1 462923301 F 09/28/(3 33,402.72 E37 0 p 4620134/4 C 1{ M 03/26/63 b31,76 . '000.Otl 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 316 4628171168 19,177.60 %20,000.00 I 1 60 $32 000,00 1 t FE F 317 462927191 'M 0808//2273 ;61 519,177,00 $20, 000000..0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 428 063 F. M 01/08/60 $22 ,2jq . 40 $36 , ' 0 0 0 4562 8 318 1 I 1+ 0 97048%1 FE 1 10/10/U2 $14,248,00 $2')000.00 i 0 0 0 1 0 1 lp 320 4820797$3 NM 01/15/611 $11$,000.00 0 O 1 0 '1 463021/46 CII IA O6/O(i/71' $59.266.00 $16,000.70 1 0 O 0 1 1 322 2 I 483 t 134114 NM 00/09/5: 0 323 463197742 FA F 06/14/71 $$20. 16 1 of) 1) NO 0.00 16,640.00 $30,000.00 0 0 0 0 1 0 11 w Ai 324 4fi 3187791 CH F 03/11/56 (G~t'S q 326 453109007 EE F ii/21/;12 $20,2511,20 $^1,0 00.00 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 46309906/ Et N 04/01/6$ 821 3,46,28 02,708 527,000.00 0 0 u 0 I 11,, F 01/08/02 537,9. 00 1 1 $17,867.20 $111 00 ,000.00 j 0 O 0 ) o O 1 `'1n)`~(~ VJ 0 1 ~ ` y ~ `~v CIfY UI OF.NIO1! - iF. iJ q l1 A IJY 191)2 JI V3 WLUNIt SOA V, NOVI: MAIN 11, 1992 , We CENSUS 1 4 4 0 0 F i t : 1'01!11 ~ OBS IDNUMBFR COV SEX I IIt i110 fF ANN PAY I IPFAMI EF C11 SI' IA MI: II NIA LIfE 261 4160839 f A M 08/20/G7 $20, 21i 9.'t 262 46614460839 06/01/51 45 1 4 G 1 1 65 L £ 520,692 00 $2I,OOD,DO 0 263 I 0 f p 1 284 461462103 E£ M 03/16/33 $21,7UU,80 $ $2212,,000000..000 0 1 0 O 0 U I v 1 0 M 07/16/29 $22,880.00 $23, DoU, 00 I U 0 p I O I 265 461476612 FL 01/05/70 EI II, 740.170 $19,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 266 461496672 NM IA 02/20/64 $10,337.30 0 a 0 1 267 4G 1496768 NM F 02/14/G6 $17,837,20 $0 U .O O 0 0 I 0 266 461661148 CH P 08/11/65 $16,083.60 $1,15,000.00 16,000.00 0 I 0 26 0 O 9 46157 V163 CH M 03/23166 Elti, 963.00 $13,000.00 0 1 0 o 1 I 270 46 159:12'/1 C" M 11/06/61 $13,832.80 0 0 1 0 1 271 461672954 EE F 06/16/68 $ l'J 899. $16,500.00 0 1 u 0 1 0 I 272 461679002 NM M 08/20/73 , 20 $24,000.00 1 0 0 0 273 451686870 FA $9.266.00 $0.00 0 O 0 p 1 0 1 274 461740167 EE M 0'1/22/4.7 $48,060.80 $49,000.00 U 0 1 0 276 451770314 N1µ F 07/111411 $1,1,977.60 $16,000.DO I 0 0 1 1 0 1 08120/70 f16:640.00 $0.00 p 0 0 1 0 1 276 46t780342 FA M 12/26/48 $25,646.40 $26,000,00 U 0 0 0 1 p 277 461781161 EE M 03/2'1/54 $18,636.8 D 0 $19,tl00.00 1 0 1 1 0 1 278 451702786 FA M 06106/47 1]9;1,402 72 $37,000.00 0 0 0 0 2711 4 6 17834 0 I 2 08 EE M 10/(G/30 $25,105.30 $73,000,00 F 0 0 I 1 0 1 80 461787826 1] 8 I 0 0 0 281 46 1768360 FA $29,4 11 '10 D 00 I 0 i 20 M 09/1' 01/49 $33,402,72 0 1 0 1 0 t 2 461800160 EE F 04/11/62 $22,401.0 $37 ,000.00 1 0 0 $23,000.00 1 0 0 0 0 1 283 461800420 CH F 12/17/60 $17,009.10 0 1 264 413,1842034 EE M 06/03/47 b[tl,'/6 $18,000 PO 0 1 1,60 $32,000. 00 I p 0 0 I o 1 22886 6 456 4 118814/4021 1 7 6 FA M 11/28/54 $31,304.09 $32,000,00 1 0 0 1 207 E[ M 00/01/47 $20, 692.00 p 521,000,00 1 0 1 1 0 F I 461/81206 E F 01110/49 EF6,b63.60 $16,000.00 1 0 0 288 161969946 IJM 0 1 0 F 08/27/51 I 51'1,30 O 1 289 482028100 FA M 0.00 $0.00 0 0 280 162063623 11/101GG $26,100.40 p p 0 I p CH f 01/08/33 $27,000.00 0 0 0 1 I 291 452086779 EE M 00/14/64 $28,891.20 $29,000.00 0 1 ~ 1 202 462007423 p 0 0 ~ $20,692.00 $21, OOD.UU 0 0 1 0 1 Y FE M 12/06/00 $20,408,00 I 0 1 p I 193 162006405 FA M 10/10/ti6 523,264.68 5$2210,:000000.0n0 no 1 0 I 1 294 452069688 CH 0 0 0 0 0 296 4620613820 FA M 91/30/68 $39,490.20 $40,000,00 0 1 0 0 1 U ( 289 182111078 $20,113.1]0 $21,000.00 0 0 0 1 0 1 fA F 12/1D/r,4 $20,217.1:0 ,000 . 00 0 1 1 0 I 287 462167200 IJM M 02/ 16,r 18 121 59, 134.PD 0 0 1 I 0 294 462210700 C11 F 04/01/67 $2tl,G17.80 $21,000.00 0 I 0 0 0 0 1 0 298 482263316 NM Y 12/10/56 $12,7U2.00 0 0 1 D 1 300 402402408 EE M 11/09/32 $25,646.40 %2(3,000 00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 301 462472610 IJM M Ofi/30/64 $16,640.00 0 0 U 0 1 302 462493664 GE M 00/28/60 $21i,105.G0 $0,00 O 0 D 303 452499061 1: M 07/20/63 $23,123.40 576,000.00 0 o p 1 P 0 304 462522613 1: M 06/01/34 $76,643.40 $26,000.00 3 06 O n D D 1 `a 462628401 .E f $26,000.00 1 0 0 306 462582166 EE M 10/1 1/42 $16,017 ,GO $16,000,00 I 0 0 0 1 0 516,681,00 $I'/,000.ou 0 1 I p 0 1 307 46 27407 62 FA M 06118168 0 0 1 308 4627407/2 FA M 06130/47 $18,263.20 $10,000.00 0 p 0 1 ' 300 462773283 )JM F 04/20/73 $$31 402,7? 10,737.6? $37,000.00 0 0 0 DI 1 310 p 1 462778118 NM 1 03/26/69 $12,792.00 $0.06 U 0 i n 311 462825378 SP M 00/14/49 $33,402,77 $3'1,000 00 0 0 0 0 1 O 312 4521161500 EE F 09/28/63 $19,177.60 520,000.00 1 0 1 1 i 313 452923301 CH M 03/26/63 D 1 0 0 311 462323484 $31,731.60 $32.000.00 0 EE F 08123/62 $10,177,30 1 0 r? f? 'A+ 315 482927086 EE M 08/27/61 $36,484.60 $$20 000.00 1 0 0 0 I 1 0-, tD m 316 462921291 EE E 01/06/60 36,000,00 I 0 0 0 D I 0 .3 I 317 462944836 EE M 10/10/62 $$242 , 7 14 . 40 248.00 $'29, 000.00 I 319 462960465 EE F 01/16/66 515,963.60 516,000.00 I 0 0 0 0 K 3111 462879783 NM M 06/OG/70 $D,25G.P0 > I 320 4630. 1848 CH M O6/09/G3 q{29,161.60 $30,oo$0 00 0 0 0.00 0 1 0 j ° n a , 321 453113404 NM M 06/14/71 916,040.00 922 4631977d2 FA F 03/11/66 $70,209.20 $0.00 p 0 p 0 0 O 0 M ~1 323 483197791 OF F II/2G/62 $21,528,00 $21,000.00 0 0 D -V 324 d5319D06'/ fL' M 04/01/68 $33,402.72 $22,000,00 p I 0 D 320 463100089 1]1: F 01/00/02 $17,637 . 20 $37,000,00 1 0 0 U 1 0 $19,000,00 1 0 0 p 1 0 1 ` i C FIY OF OENION - fE11RIl AIIY 1992 H:l3 WLDNESDAY, NOVI:MBF.R 11, 1992 6 WNIC CENSUS 11400 BISPORII OBS IDNUMBEFI CDV SEX DIF1111DIF ANN, PAY LIFE_AMI EE CII SI' FA MCI) NM I. 11L \ 326 453206129 NM M 03/17/24 $9,464.00 $0,00 O U O 0 0 1 t) 327 463211884 EE F 11/23/69 523,337,60 $24,000.00 1 0 O 0 1 0 1 328 463277608 Sr, M 02/06/89 $33,384.00 $34,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 329 4533113272 NM M 10/12/613 $12,OB4 .110 $0.00 0 0 0 U 0 1 0 330 463360297 EE F 06/06/60 $24.710.40 $28,000.00 1 0 0 U 1 0 1 331 45:1412704 EE F 01/12162 $21.216.00 $22,000 00 I 0 n 0 i 0 332 463413306 CH M 12/18/62 £291161.60 $30,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 333 463473266 CH M 08/03/63 $22.880.00 $29,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 334 463476279 FA M 12/03163 $26.166.40 527,000,00 0 0 0 V 0 1 336 463608877 SP M 01/02/42 $77,946.84 $31,000,00 0 0 1 0 1 0 I 336 463785149 SP F 06/21/66 $42,432.00 $43,000.00 0 0 1 0 I 0 1 337 463787286 FA M 11106/48 $31,304 00 $32,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 338 453868921 EE M 04/09/70 $14, 268. FIO $15,000 OD 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 339 463964280 EE M 11/19/55 $13,024.00 $15,000.00 1 0 O 0 1 0 1 340 4639648011 CII F 12/20/62 $49,067.20 $50,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 I 341 453984006 CH 1A 08/24/63 $28,121.60 $20,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 342 464046207 NM M 03/11/66 $9,464.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 343 464081546 EE M 02/16/56 $31,761.60 $32,000400 1 O O 0 I 0 1 344 4540B6907 FA M 07/21/69 $26,264.611 $29,ODO.00 0 0 O 1 1 0 1 I J O 0 I 0 345 464156496 EE M 09/06/67 518,137.00 $19,000.00 346 464240919 NM M 04107116 $9,484,00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 347 454276467 FA M 00/08/60 $21,B28.00 $22,000.00 0 0 0 1 0 I 348 464277496 CH M 06/16/6( $27,948.84 $31,000400 0 1 U 0 0 1 00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 349 464313325 FA M 01/20/66 $27,438.20 $28,000. 0 360 454134010 CH M 01/10/60 $21,528,00 $22,000.00 0 1 O 1 0 I 361 4643311412 SP M 07/09/60 $47,112.00 $95,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 U O 0 0 I 0 31512 46,4337434 NM F 01/22/67 $16,640.00 $0.00 0 O 353 464368366 CH M 06/16/60 $25.646.40 $25,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 364 46437'1360 FA M 02/01/50 $28,883.20 $29,000.00 O 0 0 1 1 0 1 366 464381171 E6 M 01/16/32 $1(1,283.20 $18,000.00 1 0 0 0 f 0 I 366 664390060 EE F 08113/60 $13,479.40 $16,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 I 307 454395176 LE M 04108168 $17,867.20 $113,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 358 454398492 NM F 05/06/66 $12,064.80 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 389 454434864 EE F 07/20/64 $20,030,40 $21,000.00 f 0 0 O 1 0 1 380 454494944 NM F 09/28/64 $12,604.80 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 361 464613594 F'A M 11/12/86 22,77G.00 $23,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 362 484547449 SP M U2/I6l37 22,880.00 523,000.00 0 0 1 0 I O 1 363 464002890 EE M 09/06/39 $36,069.60 $36,000.00 l 0 0 0 1 O 1 364 484606089 EE M 03/09/37 $27,946.84 $31,000.00 1 0 0 0 I 0 . 365 464608978 SP M 11/26/39 $33,402.72 $37,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 388 484826083 E6 M 08/07/41 $39,145.60 $40,000,00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 3617 464749173 EE M 08/10/47 $27,946.04 $31,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 368 464921312 FA M 02104/69 $36,484.00 $36,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 369 464943209 EE F 01/18/63 $20,030.40 621, 000, 00 1 0 0 370 454943913 FA M 04/IF.:62 $27,945.04 $31,000.00 D 0 0 1 1 I 371 464947336 CH M 07/11160 $33,402,72 37,000.00 0 1 0 0 I 0 1 372 456020122 CH M 10/26/63 $27,946,64 :31.000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 I 373 486040257 FA M 12/04/64 $27,102.40 $28,000.00 0 0 0 1 0 1 374 466040166 EE M 02/11/84 $25,646.40 $26,000.00 1 0 0 O 1 0 1 376 4136066296 EE F 07/05/bg $39,416.00 $40,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 I 376 466067276 CH M 06126/63 $18,632.80 £19,000.00 0 1 0 0 i 0 I 377 466066069 FA M 02/11/53 $30,GB9.20 $31,000.00 0 0 0 I 1 D 1 370 465116367 FA M 04/26/611 $31,304.00 £321000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 ts)7 fl R 379 465132766 CH M 06/06161 $16,706.40 $IG,000.00 0 V 0 0 1 0 1 300 45BIB4732 6E M 10/10/57 $26,264.69 $79,000.00 1 O 0 0 I 0 1 ~.y 381 461/209886 NM F 04/13/22 $16,640.00 $0,00 0 0 0 0 U 1 0. 382 456263086 CN M 10/20/69 y31:761.60 $32,000400 0 I O 0 I o 1 \ z 383 466268428 EE M OB/10/60 b1, 542.40 $52,000.00 1 0 0 0 I 0 384 468270203 011 M 05/21/57 $19,406.40 $20,000,00 0 1 0 0 I 0 1 I 385 466311402 NM F 12/08/71 $10,608.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 380 485353322 EF. F 10/19/67 $11,377.80 £16,000.00 I 0 0 0 I 0 I 587 456391843 CH F 06/28/61 $29,337.60 $24,000.00 0 I 0 0 1 0 I 1 0 1 ~1 390 466432943 FA M 00/27/6(1 $25,126.40 $26,000.00 0 0 0 1 0 389 465466067 NFA F 09/28/65 $12,792.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 I Q ti 390 466476602 SP M 10/10/63 $26,396.20 577,000.00 0 0 1 0 U I ,_i I ~1l 1 19'3 1 0' I:I WE01JE S9 AY, NOV EidI3ER 11 , Y VU97 c;11V 9I' I) IIN ION - FE6 RI3 A 11 14400 It C'."Oil 11 I_ I I E qp IA MP.O NM ~ VJNIC C£N9U5 EE C I 0 \ L1f E_AM1 0 I ANN _PAY 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 COV SE% El1 RI1191E $0.00 0 1 U 0 1 0 IUNUMUER $9 '301i.60 518.000.00 0 0 09S 1 NM 02/13/75 A0541BOm 03/ il 165 06/19/311 $3y,499.20 Ejs'oon.00 0 00 p O II b 1 391 456493691 CH M 06/ $36.609.60 $20000 00 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 392 49379 EE M 01/09/42 $19,57'1.60 , p 0 0 I 12/11139 399 qfi55 ,$21,000.00 1 0 0 1 0 0 364 055688916 EA f pg/56141 $20,363.20 $26,000.00 i 0 0 0 1 I 396 45b`100348 F.E µ 26,105.60 CIS 0 0 0 1 0 4f,6704009 F 06/09/43 $,685.20 $'49.000.00 O 38J EE p9/t3/43 $28 $0.00 0 O I 0 I I 1 1 0 I 391 465706498 M $10,337,60 37 000.00 0 Oki M 01/29/10 0 0 1 398 466708775 $33.402.'72 $79,000,00 0 0 0 1 0 466717747 MM µ 10/2'7/43 §26,264, 6R $ 0 1 0 0 1 , 1 0 0 0 1 399 EE 0 400 466720657 µ 04/22/43 $16 000 0 pg/0131 4fi $16,953.60 0 $31,000.00 0 1 1 0 1 401 465723394 EA F 11/21/43 $27.946.84 $0,40 O 0 U 0 0 1 1 0 ON $151,000.00 1 021115/71 ,999.20 0 1 0 0 1 402 466724309 M 510 466728000 M 02712/44 $2'1,946.84 29,000.00 I 1 I 0 1 403 A 0 404 468733004 F M 11/12/46 $20,264.68 $,11.000.00 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 406 466746223 FA M 10/pd/4fi $36,102.00 $32,Ooo.00 p 0 0 0 1 I f0/IB/4$ 531,761.60 22,00.00 0 0 1 0 406 465748137 011 F $ $p,00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 407 486B4fi762 SP M 10 !01/60 §21 ,132.015 $ 0$ 465803779 FA F $10.608.00 $30,000.00 0 p 0 1 1 0 4408 466909717 EA M. 07/18/60 $29,B8B.60 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 410 466954608 NM µ 09/18/64 $31,304.00 5:52,000.00 0 0 1 22.000.00 0 0 0 1 All 466964303 FA F $21,361,60 $ $0.00 0 0 0 0 1 p 1 4fi 69886 t2 CA M 11/06/66 $12 ,084.80 000.00 1 0 0 1 0 412 04116164 $26,396,20 1527, 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 413 466021703 FA M 06714/58 106.60 $26,000.00 0 O 1 1 4fA 468047486 NM µ 08/19756 $26, 00 $0.00 i 0 0 0 1 0 1 416 466OB6339 EE M 02/11/fib $52,000, 416 466168277 CII M 17,6313.40 518,000.00 1 p O 0 0 I 1 1/ 12/6, 4i7 466239848 NM F 11102/GI E23,5-0G fiO $19'Opp,00 I 0 O I 1 0 1 91516 EE $17,326.40 000,00 0 0 0 O I 0 410 4582 Ef. F µ 11/03162 $24, 1 0 0 0 0 1 A59 468294479 FE 1, 10/12/65 $23,337.60 '$,25 000.00 p 0 1 1 420 406314196 10117/61 $25,105.60 $0.00 00 0 1 1 0 0 421 A.,639781911) FA F $0,668, 00 $:16,000.00 0 0 0 1 0 422 456413287 EE M 01/30/'20 26,000.00 0 I 0 126.105 M 02/27/64 .60 $ $p,pp 0 p 0 0 1 0 423 468441819 NM 10/30/30 424 450442073 FA M 06/12160 b10.337•60 $213,000.00 0 O 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 466460063 FA µ $27,747 20 $0,00 0 425 406463812 NM M 09/02/63 to,999 20 0 0 I F 0 1 I e - 28 It/02//2 $0.00 0 0 0 427 468472241 CN M 02/13/66 50.00 1 p 0 1 0 466479904 NM $16,640.00 10,000.00 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 I 428 0 1 0 429 466492112 NM M 04/10/!6 $15,040.60 $ 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 466499393 fIM F 10/06/35 $44,663.60 $46,000.00 430 E_ M $26,000.00 0 0 0 S 1 I 0 1 431 468621464 02/06/36 $74,502,40 $0.00 0 0 432 466623739 EE µ $10,608.00 20,000.00 I 0 1 0 06/31/68 0 1 I 0 0 433 46627199 SG F 08/04/16 $19,177.80 36,000.00 0 0 p I 4568651420 EE p y36,568.80 63,000.00 0 I 0 434 1 456663178 Sp M 00/09137 y62,g62,g0 $0.00 0 0 435 466660204 III 10112!39 10,337,80 y32,000.00 1 0 0 438 466681998 M 05/06/41 761-60 d0 y20, 000.00 0 0 0 1 0 0 437 466587117 NM µ 04/14/40 $10, $0.00 0 1) 43$ EE 07/03/38 0 0 488809280 M #6142.40 $31,000,00 p 0 I 1 I 0 1 S f~ Ri ~ 439 45880 EE M 02123139 2 y27 ,946.84 1,000.00 0 0 0 1 440 0078 13, 0 1 0 Cq "3 441 468620670 NM µ 07l07l4ti 27,945 .04 6,000,00 I 1 p 4?. 466646776 FE M 08/08/41 $11,300,90 150.00 0 0 0 0 0 I 442 p 1 468686444 FA M 12/0'1/68 512,480,00 40,000 00 00 00 0 1 p 1 $90.,0. 1 O 0 O 44443 4 466731991 EE C 02/U3/4'! $30,146.80 $0 0 U I 1 0 1 \ 446 456840984 NM M 10l06/49 $33,629.60 0 1 0 I 468045336 F EE A µ on 04/58 $21,069.00 $22,000.00 1 0 1 448 1536,000.0000 0 0 0 U µ 58,464.00 0 0 1 y 1 447 466966788 M 07/26/03 $ 7 0 0 1 0 0 I 468922488 EA $19 003.0 $20,000.00 0 0 0 I 0 1 0 1 1 1~ 440 468940023 EE M 12/09/56 $19,073.660 $Ig,p0000 p p I 44468 0 467020703 FA M 07/02139 $16.903.00 0 0 0 I 106.80 $26,000,00 0 1 0 V 451 F 11/28/ 04 $36,000,00 0 1 487022823 N 011 M M 08/10/51 $15, I 0 0 -JAI 461 457024024 911 00/14/66 $35,608.130 $29,000,00 ` U 453 467027119 M 11/24/015 1526,264 ,88 \1 464 467027444 611 M 466 407048376 I 1✓ v CT IY OF DF. N TON - FERRUARY 1092 843 WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBF It 11, 1902 7 WNIC CENSUFI (4400 REPORII ANN PAY LIFG_AMT FE CH SP fA Milt) NM LICE. 085 IDNUMdER CCV SE% 04871107E _ 1 1 0 1 $25,10 60 $76,000.00 26, IOf .60 $26,000.00 0 0 0 I 0 1 I 0 1 466 467081128 FA M 1 /24/66 $ 4137 4157194676 EE F 1 1l23/68 146,494.A0 £17,000.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 456 457118943 fA M 6/68 $18,282.40 $19,000.00 0 1 0 1 0 1 460 467211771 CH M 08OG//522/59 $22,526.40 $73,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 460 467236610 EE f 08/21/61 $26,264.68 $20,000.00 1 0 01 0 1 461 467291661 EE M 462 4573.33212 SP M 00/02/66 $24,418.16 $27,000.00 0 0 0 0 I 0 1 I6/6A $17,667.20 $18,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 463 467344600 EE M 029 $36,157..00 $36,000.00 1 0 0 I 0 484 4b 7a44046 LE M 046// 08/1203//60 $36.506.60 $18,000.00 1 0 0 1 0 1 465 4B7a62BI2 EE F 60 $16,089.00 $17,000400 0 1 0 0 1 0 I 466 467373326 CH F 0066//0249//63 517,867.20 $16,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 467 457398128 EE F 1 46B 457410394 CH M 04/01!613 $20,161.60 $30,000.00 0 0 1 1 0 M 07/04/63 $30,650,20 $31,000.00 0 0 1 1 O 1 469 487411866 FA M 06/31/66 $29,536.00 $38'0$0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 470 487493767 FA 04/217/68 IO,60B.00 0 0 0 1 0 471 487513908 NM M 1 472 457514088 FE M 02/23/69 $12,729.60 $IB ,000.00 1 1 0 473 457614101 1 A M 06/20/71 $16,016.00 $17,000.00 0 0 0 4 474 467637848 FA M 10112/66 $24,415.16 527,0$0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 12/21/66 $10,337.60 0 0 0 I d 476 457539330 NM M 12/08/68 $17,6BO.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 I U 476 457618023 NM F !2/24/86 $26,396420 $27,000.00 1 0 0 0 477 467671166 1 0 I EE M 0 1 478 467710120 EE M 01/18/66 $12,729.60 $16 ,000.00 1 I I 0 1 479 457747236 FA f 11116148 $20,641.600 0 40 0000.00 00.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 480 457760636 FA M 0}/06/47 $37,696.00 $34,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 I 4151 487760689 EE F 00/01/47 $213,121.60 $29,000.00 0 0 0 0 1 0 I 482 457763046 NM M 0 0 1 0 1 480 467783804 EE M 02/15148 $48,076.40 $17,000.00 1 0 0 1 464 457764124 EE M 0.3/05/45 $37,371.36 $41,000,00 1 0 I 0 1 0 486 467801686 SP M 07!01/40 £21,680.40 $22,000.00 0 0 0 1 0 I A86 487802138 CH M 06/90161 30,858.'!0 $5,000.00 0 0 0 1 I 0 4157 467808324 fA M 12/04/61 8 a136,286.40 5111,000.00 0 0 0 OI I 0 4815 487820829 EC F 08114/61 ,688.00 517,000,00 0 0 0 1 F 11/28/48 16,808.60 0 0 1 0 1 489 467020718 FA F 09121/64 $28,3915.20 27,000,00 0 1 0 0 1 60 $46,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 480 457848264 OH 01118/69 $16,953, I 491 487822166 CH M 07/06/64 $22,401,60 23,000.00 0 o I 492 487982552 EE M 0 1 I 0 493 468042679 FA F 03/02/63 147,112.00 $96,000.00 0 0 1 0 494 4680/500155 FA M 06/25/66 $28,600.60 $36,000,00 O 0 0 0 1 496 468112314 EE M 08107/64 $34,690.40 126,000.00 1 0 0 0 j 0 1 1 1 408 466114786 EE M 08/06/89 $25,426.40 0 0 04/10/60 $20,692.00 $21,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 491 468138670 EE M 06/18/60 133,766.40 19,631.20 520,000400 I 0 0 0 0 0 488 468150074 EE M 01/11/63 $14,0M00 0 0 1 SS{ 0 0 0 1 4915 468160122 NM M 10114101 $,667.80 24,000.00 1 1 0 0 ,448.00 20.000.00 0 1 0 1 600 468160417 EE 02/26/69 10 501 468168070 CII $ 18 M 00/08/69 42,680.60 18,000.00 0 0 0 a 1 0 I 602 458168B99 9P M 08/12/83 $18,261,20 0 0 1 U 1 603 460159699 FA F. 01/48/82 $23,33760 24,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 004 466211203 EE M 07/26/82 120,592..00 21,000.00 1 0 0 0 0 I 605 4515288721 EE 12/06/61 $18,012.80 §10,080.00 1 606 408334'179 EE M 0 O 0 I 0 1 GCJ' 607 468367260 FA M 10/31/60 $18,fi9D.20 116,000.00 1 0 0 1 F 11/015/00 516 708.80 $$29,000.00 1 0 p 608 468387775 EE 09130/29 $ 0 0 0 1 609 4BB381821 EE M 04124170 517,867,20 sI8,000.00 I 0 0 6 a 610 46841'417 EE F 03/03/02 $20,592,00 $21,000.00 0 1 0 1 0 1 oil 468428700 3P M 10/04/fi9 $30,838.40 $31,000.00 0 0 1 0 I 9.1 EE M 00/22/37 $47,964.80 $415,000000.00 1 0 0 0 1 612 488630980 SP M p 0 ,.00 1 0 0 1 613 468848487 1 0 614 468688466 EE M 04/04/38 y26, 264.68 $29 0 516 409828262 fA M 013/19/41 $23,337.60 $14,000.00 0 0 1 1 0 09/20/43 $61,168,00 562.000.00 0 0 0 0 t" 617 458609769 FE F 12/17/44 $20,516.60 £ 26, 000.00 I 0 0 i o 1 6J` Bll 4615886676 FA M 28,000.00 I 0 U 0 BIB 4587683211 Fr. M 01/ 21/49 2266 I 6O82 B40 0 4 $ $27 21606 CH M 02/08/48 ,,000.00 0 0 0 0 1519 46815 620 408826163 EE M 12/14/49 55528,683.20 $20.000 00 I A_1 1 ~ ~V v` rtlafil'.. CItY OF m1410N - FEIIB U A IIY 109'1 8.1:1 3VE11NF. SDAY. NUVEMIII'. It 11, IUU'11 WN10 CENSUS 14400 It( PORT1 669 [ DNUMOEB CUV SEX 818flit) IE ANN PAY 1, 1FC_AMA EE C11 SP PA MEU NM I I I f. - 1522 468842802 SP F 01/22/48 $191915.?0 516,000,00 0 0 I O 1 U 1 3 4 524 4589266D2 CH M OI/24,'S1 E3~1.761.60 $32,000.00 U 1 0 0 1 0 1 62C 468981207 E1. M 12/03/F9 $IH,61i, 00 $10,000,00 1 O 0 0 l O I 000 0 I 0 1 627 458981666 EE M 00/13/63 $26,264.68 $20'000.00 0 0 0 628 458982672 SP M 09/98/41 $26,168.00 520, 520 458994099 EE m 06130/3 $3.407.72 $37,000,00 630 4BB099426 oil m 09/14/82 $27,94B.84 $31,000.00 O 1 0 0 I O I 0 1 531 459024138 NM F 06/20/62 516,640.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 EO.OU D 0 0 0 1 0 632 469027661 NM F 00/18/53 $9,464.00 0 533 459110363 EE M 06/19/68 526,305.20 $27,000.00 1 0 0 534 450130024 CIA m 12/00/64 635 460160458 EE M 08/22/58 $25.600.80 $26,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 459$500340 CE m 02J12/61 19 562.00 $20,000-00 1 0 537 469160719 FE M 07/14/72 514,248.00 $15,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 538 469160747 EE M 06/23/60 $17,014.40 $18,00000 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 839 4139153002 CIA M 07/24/64 $27, A 36.20 $20,000 00 U 1 0 0 I O I 6h/ 469189868 Cli M 0512 ~ /5H 1 6.640,00 $0 '00 0 $20,217.60 $21,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 S A Ii 60 IA F 845 489288092 SP M 0 /08/68 22,020.44 $2J,DOD.U6 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 844 489200040 SP M 12/15/0? 18,720.00 519,000,00 0 0 1 n 0 1 0 846 460392068 NM F 04/14/6B 16,640.00 50,00 O 0 O 64 4159301524H NM F 01/11/74 1,337.60 $000 0 0 460436406 Cc m 8411 460426978 SP M 06/24/31 $31,304.00 $32,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 640 46043568E EE 03/010/67 20.ooo:ao $21,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 G6o 459437669 FA M 002/23163 7/23/69 513,124.80 $27,0$O.00 no 0 0 0 U 0 1 0 651 469486082 NM F 852 469469898 EE M 06/10/83 29,181.60 530,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 884 459531240 FE M 03130/68 $17,867,20 518,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 668 4696315213 FA M 10107168 $18,699.20 519,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 O 1 867 459680932 FE M 09/11/67 516,848.00 517,000.00 7 0 0 0 0 I 888 460744406 CH M 04/07/48 542,494.40 $43,000.00 0 1 0 0 I 659 80 459749068 FA M 04/23/50 $36,276.80 30,000,00 O 0 0 1 I 0 1 8 660 480760461 CH M 11/26/47 69,600.00 60,000,00 0 1 0 O 1 (1 562 469646302 SP F 00/08/49 16,078,40 $17,000,00 0 0 1 0 I 504 4B9847691 FA FI 01/18/60 19,344.00 $20,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 U 1 568 17 ,0000.00 I 0 0 0 1 0 460866842 Ef m 013103/48 35,304.00 $1362 66T 469873048 NM F 10/08/78 11,044.80 5$0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 BIBS 469883168 89 469004006 CH M IA 6/8/01 10/14/81 26,2134.80 $21,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 6 670 469907966 EE F 06120/60 30,638.40 $31,0 $00.00 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 871 469911861 NM F 12/28/73 $10,337.80 5.00 0 0 0 0 0 I f07 ~i+ 872 459821670 CH M 07/16/62 5:31,761.60 I 32, 000.00 0 1 0 0 11174 460982432 FA F 08/98/82 5123 9,877.60 $20,000 00 0 0 0 1 1 0 U ai LL 678 469971267 NM M 02/09/76 516,640.00 5).00 0 0 0 u 0 1 p7 [y 878 469980863 NM M 00/12/84 $10,780,00 00.00 0 0 0 0 O 1 0 \ m G 8 7 7 480082783 EE M 08/19/70 $23,316.80 $24,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 3=! 878 46DIB6757 EE M 04/12/66 521,070.46 $$17 00000 A 22,000.00 0 1 0 O I 0 1 1 870 46018'!.128 CII M OH/213/d8 $18,038.40 $10,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 880 480190673 EE M 05/14/60 $28,683.20 $29,000400 0 0 0 1 1 0 U p` t fi81 400238826 FA M 1F. ^V 502 440260833 F'A M 08/02/89 $10,808.00 $20,0$0.00 0 0 0 0 0 I o 0 U) "1 583 460269302 NM M I 844 460272921 NM M 10/20/71 10,337.60 00.00 U 0 0 I `'iV\{ BOB 480274220 EE M 02/09/01 $31,761.60 032,000 00 1 1 ~Llii~rlr l ~ `1 s 8:13 WE ONESDAY, NOVEMU611 I1 1997 10 CIIV [IF 05N10µ - IEf11iUAf1Y ID92 WNIC CENSUS 14.100 REPO811 CUV SEX HIRIIIDIE ANN._, PAY L.IFE__AMI EE CII SP IA MLD NM LII'4 085 19µ0M4[8 0 1 686 460393309 EF M 11/12/64 $29,161.60 £30,000.00 I O 0 0 I 5137 46047'7614 CH M 02/03/63 $28.569.60 £22.000 00 8 0 0 O 1 0 1 BBD 460587777 EE M 07/06/38 $16,681.60 517,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 O 1 689 460684893 SP F 590 460600102 SP M 07/27/40 $36,339.20 $38,000.00 0 0 I 0 1 0 1 691 460630673 CH M 04/06/64 $34,006.00 618,0$0.00 0 1 0 0 692 460637638 NM F 01/20/60 $I6, 940.00 $0,00 0 0 0 0 O f 0 gqp 490846678 NM F 06/22/40 $10,337,90 £0.00 0 0 0 0 994 480672846 EE F 07/16/69 $E 14,304.00 519,000.00 I 0 0 D 1 00 1 596 460614862 SP M 00/27/68 26,126.40 £26,0$0.00 0 0 I 0 I 0 698 460693672 NM F 11/17/69 $11,044,60 $0.00 0 0 0 8 1 0 1 69'1 460720350 FA M 03/06/46 $43,742.40 $44,000 00 0 O 0 598 460720410 CN F 07/03/43 $02,968.80 553,000.00 0 I 0 0 1 0 1 689 460124114 EE M o6/23/41I $27,945.114 $31,000.00 1 0 0 0 0 I 600 460727811 EE M 06/13/46 $20,592.00 $21,OOn.00 1 0 0 u 0 I 0 601 460795163 NM F 08/17/70 510,608.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 06/0 1/72 $10,337.60 1 I D 1 602 460814392 FA F 12/03/49 $31.761.60 $32,ODO.OV 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 903 460826149 FA M 08/17/72 $12,688.00 $0.00 0 D 0 604 460471846 NM F 1 0 1 80$ 460881789 oil M 82!27%08 $38.304.00 532,000.00 0 U 0 6013 46OBB5220 CE M 04/02/61 527,940.8.1 $31,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 607 4608135984 FA M 04/19/61 $13,270.40 $15,000.00 0 0 0 0 8 0 1 608 46UB86138 NM F 04/26/63 $30,402.72 53'1,000.00 0 I 0 0 1 0 1 609 480887fl 07 CH M 3 1 0 I 610 460963270 CII M 10/ 6/61 $27,945.134 $38,000.00 n 0 0 1 1 p I 611 460988636 FA N' 09/13/53 568,22$.00 $137,000.00 0 0 0 1 0 1 612 460967722 FA 1 07/01/60 $23,B57.60 $24,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 I 513 460969049 F.F. M p 1 0 1 814 4GO969B39 Eli F 01/16/61 $20,084.80 $20,000.00 1 0 0 p I 614 461024756 EF. F 01/06/69 $20,612.BO $21.000.00 I 0 0 r 616 461049398 CN 1. II/30/K6 $37,190.40 $38,000,00 0 0 0 0 1 0 617 461117291 FA 11/26/01 $12,970.20 50.00 0 0 0 0 I 0 I 618 461170247 NM M 1 0 1 619 461232614 CN F 07/18/68 14,331.20 518,000.00 0 1 1 0 1 620 461238808 C11 M 07/00/82 2y,664.00 $28, 000.Ou 0 0 0 8 0 1 621 461316806 FA M 024 461412224 SP M 08/07/62 126,548,40 $26,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 023 461430217 EE M 08/06/60 $15,Bfl3.60 1,10,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 024 461431287 EE M 07/27/6-1 $26,39$.20 12'1,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 826 461433884 CII M Od/10/D4 $l'/,638..10 510 ,900.00 0 1 1 1 0 I D 0 U gpg 461466882 FA M Q2/13/30 $22,880,00 $23,000.00 8 0 827 4BIB30192 EE f 01/23/68 $14,740,00 $15,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 628 461830192 EE M 04/11/31 539,410.00 140,000.00 I 0 0 0 0 1 0 629 461880308 LL M 10/20/32 $19,337.60 $0.00 0 0 0 p 1 630 461683367 NM f 0 I 631 461618290 EL M 12/21/87 $19,121.60 $29,000.00 1 0 0 0 I 0 gap 481822495 EE M 03/10/42 $19,177.60 $20,000.00 1 0 l I 0 637 461840816 FA F 00/29/41 $16,192.00 $37,000.00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 834 461049632 E6 f4 Og/28/42 {133,402.72 $37,000.00 0 0 O I 1 O 1 "~7~ pIa 636 461668866 f'A M 01/08/bA 518,283.20 $19,000.00 O 1 0 0 638 481919639 CI, M 03/29/45 SIB, 1'!'1.80 20,000.00 0 0 1 0 I c6 .,ma 637 401701633 FA F 08/17/99 116,392.00 16,000.00 0 0 Ly, 838 4017161379 SP M O6/12/70 $21,469.24 55524.000.00 1 0 0 0 0 N 639 A8171tl377 EC M 1 0 I 640 4817264$1 NM M OR/10/46 $44.007.20 $A0, 090.00 0 0 00 0 01 1 j X1 6dl 461729860 NM M 01/08/69 $28,680.20 $29,000.00 0 1 I 642 401792375 C11 M 00/01/62 $16,649.6.0 $16,000.00 U 0 O I I i l 643 401822710 FA F 0 D 1 I ~h 044 401970069 EE M 04/22/51 119,011.20 120,000.00 1 0 0 w ~~l 646 4619433'10 EE M o4/04/$0 $20,254.66 $29,000.00 1 0 0 1 0 I 646 461940280 SP M 03/09/63 $1-0,331.20 116,000,00 0 0 0 1 0 64'7 461946540 EE M 10/30/64 $29,161,60 $30,000.00 1 0 647 d61tlA7304 FA 1" 04/21/69 $21,2711.0 $22,000.00 0 0 0 I 0 1 ~ '~R 1 +.~[se^" 849 482023269 CH M OA/08/fl7 116, 038, A0 116,000.00 0 I 0 1 1 p 1 ~1 080 462041166 FA F OB/29/64 146,384.00 $93.000.00 0 0 0 ~ R C I I Y 01 UE: N ION - IFO9UAHY 1992 813 WLIINLSIIAY, NOVEM01;11 11, 1992 11 WNIC CLNSUS 14400 fit PO It 11 065 IDNUMBEH COV SEX HIHIIIUIE ANN-PAY LIFF_AM1 CE CII S11 FA ME: 1) NAI LIF L. 0 651 462082328 NM F 03l 111 /70 510,899.20 $0.00 0 0 0 o O I 652 462195767 CH M 0'1/04/69 $26,264.06 $29,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 863 462214656 FA F 09/12/60 $36,358.40 $37,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 664 452217410 EE F 10/13/159 $31, 761.60 $:12,000.00 1 0 O 0 O 1 686 462232209 FA M 12/22/68 $19,610.40 $20,000.00 0 0 O 1 1 O 1 666 462351630 FA M 04/28/61 $31,304.00 $32,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 667 462371046 EE M 10/28163 $22,880.00 $23,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 668 462394399 FE F 06/14/64 $14,706.80 $16.000.00 1 0 0 0 I 0 660 46239,11344 CH M 03/29/63 $72,880.00 $23,000.00 0 1 O 0 1 0 1 660 462414050 FA M 11/22/68 $16,078440 $17,000.00 O 0 0 1 I D 661 462414100 CH F 11/27/60 $20,446.40 $21,000,00 0 1 J 0 I 0 1 662 462415609 NM M 02/10/70 $11,461.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 663 462426224 NM M 10/10!27 $9,464.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 U 1 0 664 462476586 NM F OB/25/69 $16,640.00 $0.00 0 0 9 O 0 1 O 668 462491302 EE M 11/16/64 $20, 1H 1.50 $30,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 666 462498963 FiM f 12/23/68 $15,953.60 $15,000.00 0 0 0 0 0 I 1 667 462610034 EE M 03/14/06 $26,395 20 $27,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 666 462618100 NM M 08/09/6!3 $10,608.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 669 462663686 FA M 09106138 $21,091,20 $22,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 670 462696721 LE M 11/23/67 $17,430.40 $1R, 000.00 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 671 462697084 NM F 08/26/70 $9,256.00 $o.OU 0 0 0 0 0 1 672 462647282 LE 673 442686863 CH M 01/17/41 $29,7R960 $30,000.00 0 1 U 0 1 0 1 674 462742343 EF M 01/20/47 $20,092.80 $21,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 O I 878 482748760 CE M 09/04/46 26, 264.69 $29,000,00 1 0 o O 1 0 1 676 462746008 CH M 09/17/49 18,202,40 $19,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 677 462747245 EE F 07121/45 18,963.60 $IF ,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 678 462764968 EE M 03108/48 531,304.00 $32,000.00 U O 0 1 0 l 679 80 462766698 CE M 07/02/48 5$20,692.00 $261,000.00 1 O 0 O I D I 6 4432767816 ell All Ob/2514a 692 402Y89R26 CII M 02118/48 $39,145.60 $40,000,00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 6111 r 883 462767643 NM M 01101156 $12,792.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 E 0 684 46262 CE EVE 06/ 18/b I S35,484.60 $36,090.00 1 0 1061 9B6 462866646 FA M 05/27147 $$33,402.72 $37,000.60 0 O 0 1 1 O 1 46290482!) FA EYE 027/50 27 94B 04 $31,000.DD 0 0 607 462909398 FA M 04/01/80 $27,946.84 $31,ooo.ou 0 0 0 1 L U 1 ssa 4631 14013 689 463170048 NM IF 06/21/63 26.996.40 $27,000.00 0 0 0 0 O 1 1 690 463179283 CH M 03110/B9 531,761.60 $32,000.01) 0 1 0 0 I 0 1 681 463318156 C11 M 07/12/62 522,880.00 $23,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 O O 0 0 0 1 0 692 463316854 NM F 08/27/59 $13,041.60 $ $ 0 693 463338438 FA M 11/18/83 524,418.16 §bS$S 27, 000 00 0 o I I o I 94 0 6 489363096 f4 M m 06/1/66 06/061/62 $28,688.2029,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 09 886 463463265 CE M 03114/62 $17,807.20 t8,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 897 46360109 WE M 04/03/67 $23,316.80 $24,000.00 U 1 0 0 0 698 463B28327 E F. F 699 463629834 EE M 09/12/34 $'28,683,20 529,000.00 1 0 0 0 0 707 463519916 BE, CH F 12/79/67 $16,142,40 $10,000 00 0 1 0 0 1 0 i 702 463688280 EE M 12/20/36 $21,690.40 522,000,00 1 0 O D 1 0 1 f0 crl ctii 703 483688869 SP M 11120137 $21,690.40 22,000.00 0 U 1 0 1 0 rl .h 704 463607930 CE M 05/17/41 $20,030.40 521,000.00 o 0 0 I 0 „ 708 463824864 EE F 02110/39 $19,177.00 $20,000.00 1 O 0 0 1 0 1 116 ~y Q wl 10/07/8 Is 283.20 10,000. 00 0 707 46398299 FA M 02/01/47 x 104,105.60 $179,000,00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 706 463767093 FA M 10/27/47 $26,883420 $18,000,00 0 0 0 1 1 0 I v 709 463781288 C11 M 06/20/47 $31,844.80 $32,000 00 O 1 U 0 1 0 I 710 4 711 463784492 FA M 01/30/60 $33,402.72 $37,000.00 0 O 0 1 1 0 I !t", 712 463796601 FA f 07/26/47 $28,683.20 $29,000.00 0 O 0 I 1 0 I 713 463790817 NM M 17112/70 $10, 3,11, Ho $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 \l~ 718 483825410 011 M 06/18/61 $29, 161.VO $30,000.00 0 1 D o 1 U ,~Gplt Q ~y1 ~1 n lx~ T9 1 CI IY OF DENT LIN - IEUBUARY 1992 11 13 WE ONESUAY, NOVEMBE II 11, IJJ2 12 WNIC CENSUS 14400 UEPO1111 OBS IUNUMBER COV S£M UTA 1110IE ANN _PAY L I F C_AML IL CH SP FA MEU NM LIEF. I 716 463900934 E£ M 02121/60 $26,264,68 $29,000.00 1 0 0 o I 0 1 l 711 46302OB21 CH M 06/77/62 $24,128.00 $26,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 71B 463923232 EE M 01/19/63 $27, 948.H4 $31,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 719 463932692 NM F 03/03/72 $16,640.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 U f 0 720 463960648 FA F 03/29/72 $16,SB6.80 $17,000400 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 721 464151166 C41 F 08/10/61 $20,009.60 $21,000400 0 1 0 D 0 1 722 464173178 5P M OB/07/61 $25,417.60 $26,000.00 0 0 V 0 1 0 1 723 464192687 NM M 03/14/57 $17,680.00 $0.OU 0 O O 0 0 1 0 724 464211460 CH M 10/27169 $22,880.00 $23,000.00 O 1 O 0 1 0 1 72B 464211614 NM F 02/16/68 59,464.00 50.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 726 464214027 FA M $2/01/53 $26,264.68 $29,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 727 464351641 FA M 08/30/63 $16,203.20 $17,000,00 0 0 0 1 1 0 728 464435133 RE M 06/27/63 $26,395.20 $27,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 729 464443643 EE M 10/31/32 $36,464.80 $36,000400 1 0 0 0 1 0 l 730 464466006 FA M 11/10163 $28,121.60 $29.000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 I 731 464470900 CH M 03/19/69 $15,017.60 $16,000 00 0 1 0 o I 0 I 732 464484847 NM F 03/15/23 $9.464.00 $0.00 0 0 0 O 0 I 0 733 464406210 CH F 07/31/66 $16,666.80 $17,600.00 0 1 0 O 1 0 I 734 464612436 EIS M 03/18/69 $12,729.60 E15,000.0C 1 0 0 0 1 C I 736 464632690 EE M 08110/66 $22,422.40 $23,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 736 464660149 EE M 08/06/64 $23,899.20 $24.000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 737 464598413 CH M 04/26/66 $24,024.00 $26,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 738 484642037 FA M 08/22141 $37,371.36 $41,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 739 464644700 SP F 01/06/41 k32,260.80 $33,000.00 0 0 1 0 V 0 1 02/01146 510,203.20 $Ifi,000.00 V O 0 1 1 0 1 774410 448644686873826163 FFEA F M 01108141 $$117.388.H0 $18,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 742 464703149 SP M 08/29/44 $18,636.80 $19,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 743 464703241 FA M 11/13/46 $33,402.72 537,000.00 D 0 0 1 I O I 144 464708489 SP M 11108/42 $17,807.20 $18,000,00 0 0 1 0 1 u I 746 404711133 EE M 08/17/68 515,953,60 $16,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 746 494702980 NM F 07/03/72 512,679,7-0 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 747 464791046 NM M 09113/70 $10,608,00 00.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 748 464BBOBBO FA M 11/10/70 $16,283.20 $'f 9,000,00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 749 464966444 FA M 01/20/61 $30,617.60 531,000.00 0 0 U I 0 1 760 464886203 £E M 04/06/49 $23,275.20 $24,000,00 1 0 0 0 1 G 1 ,a 761 464948907 EE M 0'1 22/BI $26,284.68 $29,000 00 0 0 0 1 0 1 792 0 0 1 O I 464971706 EE. M 11,30/63 $18,283.20 515, 00000 1 0 763 464683317 FA M 01/01/56 127,945.94 $31,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 764 484808276 FA M 04/26/66 315,038,40 $16,000.00 0 0 0 1 I 0 1 766 488041689 FA M 09/18/57 $33,402.'12 s37 , 000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 I 766 466110978 CH M 10/22/66 027,946.84 531,000.00 0 1 0 0 I 0 1 767 466112005 FA M 12/$3/64 $28,121.60 $29,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 768 466113804 SP M 02/17/56 $17,721.60 $18,000.00 o P 1 0 1 0 1 769 466118889 FA M 07/04/61 $29,161,60 $30,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 760 4651,7771 EE F 12/12/56 531,761.60 $32,000.00 I 0 0 0 1 0 1 761 466110476 EE M 10/14/69 $20,113.60 $21,000.00 1 0 0 O 1 0 762 466190480 EE M 04/18/61 516,244.80 $17,000.00 I 0 0 0 1 0 1 M 08103113 $0,464.00 $0.00 0 0 0 O 0 1 763 466208183 NM 0 01113/72 $10,608,00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 G 1 0 71604 6 446566 227966B6493 B FA NM F M 01/08/87. $20,030.40 $21,000.00 0 0 0 I I 0 1 766 4615363184 NM F 07/06170 $10,690.20 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 707 466377513 £E F 08/29/61 030,233.60 $37.00o.00 1 0 U 0 1 o 768 496477816 NM M 03/13/66 $21,777.60 .$0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 789 466646462 EE F 08/26/36 $21,768.80 022,000.00 O 0 0 1 0 1 I 14 70 466664256 FE M 17/06/64 538,758.40 $34,000.00 1 0 0 0 O I 7 i 7 1 86611006 EE M 10/08/67 $26,390.20 $27,000.00 I 0 O 0 1 0 1 771 4 « 772 465611006 NM F 10/27/72 $10,800.20 00.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ID 773 466725002 EE M 01/10/47 $47,736.00 $40,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 I W 774 466769394 NM F 08/21/68 $11,068.80 $0.00 0 0 0 O 0 1 0 776 468786724 EF. F 07/31/56 $31,491.20 $112.000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 776 466799883 SP F 06/0502 $17,887,20 $18,000.00 0 0 I 0 1 0 777 465804490 FA F 04/28147 $22.422,40 $23,000.00 0 0 0 I 0 I 1 778 466B12868 FE M 11/07/70 5$21,469.24 $24,000.00 I U 0 0 1 0 I MVVV 779 466820882 NM F 08/19/48 ,.60 19,660.60 0 D 0 0 0 1 I 780 465827100 EE M 04/19 06410,795932.00 01'10,000.00 1 0 0 V I 0 1100 Ilk CITY 01' DENICN - FEBRUARY 1992 8!13 WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 1!192 13 ' WNIC CENSUS 14400 FIEP01111 005 1ONLIMBE8 COV SEA HIFI FI?D 1E ANN_PAY LIFE_AMI EF. C11 SP FA MED NM IIFU 781 466097699 NM F 06/08/70 $10,337.60 0 1 0 702 466946700 FA M 07/14/61 $93,402,'/2 $37,000,00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 783 466968069 FA M 06/03/63 $ 1 F1 , 953. Fi0 $16,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 784 486980027 CH M 12/11/153 $26,332.80 $27,000.00 0 1 a O 788 466020396 FA M 04/04/56 $36,484.80 $36,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 786 466021941 CH ,M 08/06/64 $39,416,00 $40,000.00 0 1 O 0 1 O 1 707 466023099 EF M 07/14/66 $31,632.80 $32,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 O 1 788 466025202 EE F 01/17/62 SIB, 767.20 $16,000,00 1 0 a 0 1 0 1 789 466026498 EE M 06/18/67 $28,662440 $29,000.00 1 O b 0 1 0 1 790 466027709 CFI M 11/11/62 $18,283.20 $19,000.00 0 I r~ 0 1 0 791 466119749 OH M 03/11/69 $16,304.00 $19,000.00 O 1 O 0 1 0 702 466147118 NM M 03/16/19 $9,464.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 793 466147249 EE F 10/07/18 $16,881.60 $19,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 794 466194227 EF M 05/10/69 $23,809.20 $24,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 796 466210687 EE F 03/27169 $22,422.40 $23,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 796 466268341 LE M 12/19/60 $18,168.40 $19,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 797 466274048 EE F 09/09/71 $14,372.80 $16,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 798 466278300 EF. M 10/29/57 $291889.60 $30,000.00 1 0 O 0 1 0 1 709 466311214 EF M 12/27/60 $19,032.00 $20,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 800 466319066 EE F 09/01/63 $26,166.40 $27,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 801 466353808 FA M 06/14/62 $20,113.60 $21,000,00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 802 466354441 E£ M 10/28/64 $16,931.20 $17,000.00 1 0 0 0 803 466413106 FA M 06/17164 $26,398.20 $2'/,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 804 419433737 NM F 03/26/70 $16,640.00 $0.00 0 0 0 O 0 1 0 806 4L6437177 EE M 08/30/63 $2(,417.60 $26,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 BOB 466444891 CE M 07/18/30 $31,304.00 $32,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 807 466461192 FA M 09/28/62 $36,484.80 $$$36,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 BOB 4664621i28 SP F 12/13; ' '1 I6, 681.60 16,000,00 0 0 1 0 809 466464619 5P F 02/09, i.1 110,177.60 !6,000,00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 810 466476066 NM M 05/12/69 $16,640.00 $0,00 0 0 0 0 811 466626848 LE F 04/17/36 $16,666.80 $17,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 01 1 812 466619832 FA M 08/29/66 $26,264.68 $29,000.00 0 0 0 I 1 0 1 813 466669610 EE M 04/03/69 $26,39fi.20 $27,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 814 466682468 Et M 08/24/43 $31,304.00 $32,000.00 1 0 O 0 1 0 BIB 466718616 EE M 08/24/69 s18, 262.40 $19,000,00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 BIB 466727610 EE M 02/26/44 538,480,00 $39,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 817 466745176 LE F 10108/44 519(77,60 §20,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 I 916 466747694 FA M 02/08/47 $27,,946.Bd $31,000.00 0 0 0 BIB 466749443 FA M 08/21/47 536,689.80 536,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 p 1 B20 466827647 EF F 07/13/48 $10,177.80 120,000.00 1 0 0 O 1 0 1 821 466842187 FA F 04/28/49 $16,078.40 $111,000.00 0 0 0 F 1 0 1 822 4668,13001 CH M 09/26/48 y31,304.00 $32,000.00 0 1 0 0 0 1 823 486849306 EE F I0/02/4d $12,468.20 616,000,00 I O 0 p 1 0 1 824 466880221 EE F 02/23/51 31,428.80 $32,000.00 1 0 0 0 828 466920061 CH M 09122/63 20,1392,00 $$21,000.00 0 1 0 0 I 0 1 826 466927232 CH F 08/30/58 24,710.40 525,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 827 466929281 FA M 08/08/61 $27.946.94 $311000.00 0 0 0 1 828 486906908 HM M 01/01/01 $10,:137.00 $0.00 0 O 0 a 01 0 1 $28 467066762 FA M 11/29/66 $3001396.80 $31,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 p 0 850 407068772 LE M 10/14168 $14,310 40 16,000.00 1 0 0 p 1 831 467081463 CH F 02/10/69 $26,416,00 $270000.00 0 1 0 0 1 00 1 892 467O8OB19 EE !A 03/11/68 y17.430.40 $18,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 I 833 467086498 CH F 11/01/68 $19,177.80 $20,000,00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 834 467176120 FA M 02/27169 $26,640.40 $26,600.00 0 0 0 835 467237294 C11 M 08/07/63 $70,692.00 $21,000,00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 ~Ol 2. 1 836 467247606 NM Al 01116/23 10,3..'1.80 $0.00 0 0 0 0 n b 837 467268183 (IH F 11/11/67 tiG,636.00 $1'/,000.00 0 1 0 p , 1 0 iY U ~ ' 838 487210007 NM M 09/14/83 $13,416.00 $0.00 O 0 0 0 p 1 0 1 43 O cx 889 467270873 EE M 08/09/68 $22,214.40 $23,000.00 1 O 0 0 0 840 407298463 E£ M 00120/63 $14,268.80 $16,000.00 1 O 0 0 I D 841 4672GS664 CH 1 08/09/613 $16,057.60 $17,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 842 487362961 FE M 06125/66 $22,020.44 $24,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 { 943 487378447 NM M 03/27/68 $10,337.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 844 487388886 CH M 01/28/83 ,528,:21.60 $29,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 848 46741234) EE M 12/31/tl9 $10,198.40 $20,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 `V ~ V i b y CITY OF DENION - FEBRUARY 1997 8:1:3 WLUNI'SDAY, NOJISMBLII 11, 1992 1a z wNIC CENSUS 14400 REPORII IF L_AMI EE CH 5P fA MET) NM FIFE OHS IDNUMBEB COV SEK 8111THDiF. 21N.PAY L 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 06/20/83 $21,690.40 $22,000.00 p O I 7430689 FA M 01/29/71 510,808.00 $0.00 0 0 D I 0 i I 846 4674,10699 847 461438607 NM F 66 526,646,40 $26,000.00 0 1 O 0 64B 467470861 Cli m 067 $26,306.60 026,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 I 849 467499696 CH M 06//2827/537 $28,844.Ho $27,000.00 O 0 0 I1 1 p 1 850 4671521095 FA M 1307.20 17,000.00 1 0 1 0 1 8151 467534701 EE M 09/1/0 08/019///01/660 9 $$1166,,078.A0 $17 ,000.00 I 0 0 0 0 I 0 1 862 467636449 EE F 01/04/67 $23,899.20 $24,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 663 4675H16S1 5P M fi6 $IG,392.00 $16,000.00 0 0 I 0 1 0 0 854 467577276 SP M Op07//1O66//37 $37,371.36 $41,000.00 1 0 O 866 467683933 FE M 12/20/41 539,146,60 $40,000.00 0 0 0 1 0 1 856 467694267 FA M 11/04/69 $21,286.H0 $22,000.00 O 0 1 0 1 O 1 $32,000.00 D 0 1 0 1 957 487836500 SP M 0 0 I 0 1 868 467640074 SP M 09/27/42 $33,402.22 1 1169 467613696 Ek M 09/08/40 $26,663. 20 $29,000,00 O 0 1 0 I BBB 46 7643694 EE M 08/09142 $27,845.84 $31,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 861 467666131 CH M 05130/71 11'/,763,20 $18,000.0 0 0 1 0 11/07/60 $14,788.80 115,000.00 1 0 0 0 0 662 467827046 EE F 08/09/51 $69,908.80 $140,000.00 0 0 1 1 0 863 46764B533 CH M 64 548,609.60 $49,000.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 864 467902620 FA M 0072/1/016//73 $10,337.60 $0.00 0 0 0 0 1 865 487980088 NM M 12128163 $33,402,472 0 .37,000,00 1 D p 1 886 467880301 EE 18,060.00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 867 4679113966 fA M 02/16/64 $35.276. 0 1 86B 467984119 CH f 10/10!61 $36,278.80 36,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 I 899 468601625 CH F 03/26/51 020,2fi9.20 21,000.00 O 1 0 0 U 0 0 gyp 472700327 EE M 04/18/68 $23,004.80 $24.600.00 1 0 I 871 473742187 NM F 07/29/86 $12,792.00 00.00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 872 474746390 CH F 11/03/63 $22,422.40 $23,000.00 O 1 0 1 0 1 07.1 474823297 EE M 09/21/64 $22,318.40 $23,000.00 I 0 0 0 1 1 1 574 475362914 FA M 001/14137 $22,401.60 $23,00000 0 0 9/10/69 $26,582440 $27,000.00 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 975 475760070 NM N 07/28/46 $31,761.60 $32,000.00 0 0 U p 1 876 478545480 FA or)/02/E2 $18,963.60 $18,000.00 1 0 D 0 U 0 1 877 479721707 EE F or)/02/E2 26/61 $'.38.480.00 539,000,00 I 479850679 EE M 0607//09/42 $16,078.40 $17,000.00 0 0 0 1 I p I 88278 9 480507649 NM F 9/53 044,282.40 $46,000.00 0 0 0 I I 0 I HBO 480604869 FA M 0160//106/53 $40,092.2600 $$21, 000000.00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1381 482667433 FA M 1 0 1 p 0 I 0 1 682 482921144 EE F 08/30/66 $20,269..00 883 462924603 FA M 00106/63 $35,484.80 $336 6, 000.00 0 p 0 1 1 694 48461160!8 CH M 0./14/49 $27.436.20 $28,000.00 0 1 0 0 I 0 I F HBO 486724396 Cif F 01131/62 $21,216.0 $22,000.00 0 p 1 0 1 0 1 8118 488326546 SP M 04/07/30 $23,867.680 $24,000.00 0 0 0 0 r+ 02/28160 $18,408.00 $19 , 000,00 1 0 0 0 0 1 687 489728064 EE M FISH 49040$249 EE M 09/27/38 $27,768.00 $28,000.00 a 0 0 V 689 492823340 SP M 02/22/44 $20,682.00 521,000.00 0 0 0 1 880 491601161 EE M 09/23/49 $21,382.40 $22,000,00 1 0 I 0 1 0 I 891 498628721 SP M 02/03/66 123,299.20 $22,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 0 I 892 48732432" SP M 09/24/28 520,692.00 $21,000.00 0 0 I 0 I 693 /97446371 5P M 02/26140 $39,146.60 $40,000.00 0 0 I 0 1 0 894 499402821 SP M $1/30/32 $20,502.00 $'21,000.00 0 1 0 0 0 1 ,000.00 0 1 0 0 896 498804010 CH 11/06/67 $20,259.20 $21 0 1 BBB 498741797 CH F 0'//15/69 $35,484.B0 $360000.00 0 0 0 B96 80160719'7 NM F 0!1/09147 $16,640.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 t 0 1 0 1 698 603621235 CH M 09/20/48 $115 ,FIG 3.60 156,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 698 604888018 FA M 03/01/66 $63.393.60 6 ,000.00 0 0 1 0 900 506941015 SP M ll/20/fi9 531,512.00 3..,000.00 0 0 0 I 1 0 1 K/' Q9 1~-S 07/10/42 $84,697,60 $170,000.00 0 1 0 1 * ~0 m Z3 HOF 507510960 FA M 00/Ofi/415 $18,636,80 $19,000.00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 pp, V~ 902 1 607885121 FA M 0 0 0 11 0 1 ¢t y 803 508602829 CH M 01/09/48 121,589.H0 $15,000.00 0 0 804 808827301 £E M 10/03/49 037,148.80 538,000.00 I 0 0 0 i 1 I a /86 $16,610.00 $0,00 0 I 908 806942886 NM F 12/01 $6 08 8099-08427 E6 M 08/ 13/62 7,282.40 5 1 1 6, 000 . 0D 1 0 0 0 1 D 9 t 907 811486876 EE M 01/31147 $26,396.20 $27,000. 00 1 1 0 0 4h 906 811880189 CH F 07/01/54 $38,278.80 $38,000.00 0 1 0 1 l 809 512747686 FA M 07/13/60 01127,6 ,78697.20 9.60 $27 , 000.00 0 0 0 0 1 910 513205663 EE F 03/13/27 018,000.00 1 1 /w c~ y e CITY OF DENTON FEBRUARY 1992 H'. 13 WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 11 1992 15 WNIC CENSUS 14400 REP0911 095 IDNUMBER COV SEA BIRTIIDIE ANN-PAY LI I'It__.AMI EE C11 SP FA MEN NM I. IFF. 911 513371351 EE F 07/2'1/38 514,601.60 $18,000.00 1 0 n 0 1 0 1 S 912 617625925 FA M 01/10148 $32,260.80 $33,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 913 ti I6808811 EE F 05/01/64 $34,112.00 $35,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 914 517862002 CH M 11/05/67 $24,418.16 $27,000 00 0 1 O 0 1 0 1 916 520445789 SP F 12/16/40 $24,918.40 $26,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 O 1 918 520808802 EE M 12/04/64 $25,646.40 $26,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 917 520HOSSIG FA M 09/12/51 $28,787.20 $29,000.00 0 0 O 1 1 0 1 918 520823455 SP M 12/30159 $22.131.20 $23,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 919 621662588 FA M 11/30148 $71.664.00 $78,000.00 0 O O 1 1 t 1 920 522290612 F..E F 05/10/66 $16,615.20 $17,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 921 523460020 EE M 04/30/40 $25,646.40 $26,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 922 523546616 EE M 05/13144 $88.857.60 $178,000.00 1 0 O 0 1 O 1 923 524901814 CH M 03/09/66 $66,676.00 $114,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 f 1 924 525083029 CH - F 04/11/6B $11,366.80 $16,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 925 626276128 FA F 11/26/63 $16,953.60 $16.000.00 0 0 O 1 1 O 1 926 626809619 EE M 03/12142 $27.945.84 $31,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 O 1 927 627621420 EE M 11108140 $28,683.20 $29,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 928 634706030 NM F 01/28169 $16,640,00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 929 537368084 EE F 02111/40 $23.337,60 $24,000.00 I 0 0 0 1 0 1 930 537866190 EE M (0/23169 $17,867,20 $[8,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 931 638789436 EE F 03/01167 $11,684.80 $16,000.00 1 0 O 0 1 0 1 932 639703974 FA M 06/28/68 $23,867.60 $24,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 933 54613/642 CH F 09/24167 $22,880,00 $23,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 934 54684 115 CH F 06/28151 $19,177.60 $20,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 935 54624)f,89 CH M 03/24/67 $23,899.20 $24.000.00 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 936 5463' 647 EE F 07/06/59 $29,515.20 $30,000.00 1 0 0 O 1 0 1 937 646d .7342 EE M 12/05/49 $20,264.GB $29,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 938 54d940n64 EE M 06/10/66 $26,396.20 $27,000,00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 939 547291107 Ef. M 08124/68 $18,724.80 $16,000.00 1 0 0 O 1 0 1 940 650171427 CN F OB/18162 $16,889.60 $17,000.00 0 1 0 O 1 0 I 941 860435988 NM M 10122166 512, 6HB.GO $0.00 0 0 0 O 0 1 O 942 681842397 EE M 02/19163 3$17,880.00 $IH,000,DO 1 0 0 0 1 O 1 943 55B944299 SP F 05/03162 $28,476,20 $20,000,00 O 0 1 0 1 0 1 944 666801501 SP M 07/11/65 $20,592.00 $21,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 948 660046112 CH F 12/23/62 $19,177.60 $20,000.00 O 1 0 0 1 0 1 946 663642614 FA M 10/03148 $46,342.40 $47,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 947 664688276 FA M 01/21141 $74,380.80 $149,000.00 0 O 0 1 1 0 1 948 665629147 5P F 09/12/44 $16,993.60 $17,000.00 0 0 1 O 1 0 1 „ 949 668110207 CH M 01/14/65 $26,396.20 $27,000.00 0 1 0 0 1 O 1 900 669605830 EE M 09/07/45 $27,946.114 $31,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 951 570168568 EE F 01/01/48 $25,105.60 $26,000.00 1 0 U 0 1 0 1 952 57$355277 EE M 04/02160 $27,946.84 $31,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 963 57$823092 NM F 01/06148 $16,972.80 $0.00 0 0 0 0 O I 0 954 572334474 CH F 09/18/58 $20,009.60 $21,000,00 0 1 0 0 1 O 1 986 572693546 SP M 09/24163 $20,862.40 $21,000,00 0 0 1 0 1 O 1 868 575609680 EE M 11/26/51 $28,683.20 $29,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 967 686260733 SP M 08/19/49 $46,631.20 $46,000.00 0 0 1 0 1 O 1 968 586442803 FA F 10/30/49 $19,790.80 $20,000.00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 959 586021930 EE M 10/04/68 $22,422.40 $23,000.00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 960 633019275 NM F 11/16171 $121684.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 O 961 638019637 NM F 05/18/76 $91260.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 962 643034189 NM M 00/10/72 $10,608.00 $0.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 O 963 644183617 FA M 12/27/46 $16,038.40 $16,000,00 0 0 0 1 1 _0 --1 23899000 00 369 181 83 IR8 808 166 831 [a ~ u P~ r C[TY OF DENTON 8:19 WFU NESOAY, NOVEIMRER I1, 1992 16 MEDICAL PLAN PARTICIPATION \ FREQUENCY BAR CHART I'REQ C11M. PERCENT CLIM. COV FREQ PERCENT 1B1 1131 12.40 22.40 CN rrrrrrraaarrr+aarrr•rrrrrrrrarrrrarr EE •a.rrrrrrrrraraarraraa♦rarrrrraararrraaarrrarrraarrrrrraarrrr. rrrrrrrrrr 969 ti40 44 43 F6 03 IVfl 726 22.90 69.73 FA rraaraara•ar.rrrrrrrarraarrrrrrrrrrr.a 03 BOB 10.29 100.00 Sp arrrrrrraarrrara♦ ___r__.r__. 20 40 60 80 T00 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 900 920 340 300 FREQUENCY ~Ya 3f T lr~ to l'A a RI r I 1 lam. 7 ANontla D } : DECEMBER 89 1992 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID # 1442 - FULLY INSURED MANAGED CARE HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to Philadelphia American Llfe Insurance Company. SUMMARY: This bid is for health insurance coverage for City of Denton employees, and retirees as well as their prospective dependents. Only one bidder responded to our solicitation advertisement. BACKGROUND: Memorandum dated December 8, 1992 from Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFEC'T'ED: All regular full time and part time employees, retirees utilizing the program and their respective dependents. FISCAL IMPACT: 1992-93 budget funds. Respactf lly submitted: L1oy V . Harrell City Manager Approved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent agenda. 316 wpm Ty 9 dG ~jl 6 DATE: 12/08/92 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FRO14: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Staff recommendations for renewal of Philadelphia American Lire Insurance Company's Health Insurance contract and plan design changes for January 1, 1993 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the 1993 health insurance renewal rate increase of 15% negotiated with Philadelphia American Life Insurance Company (Philadelphia American Life), along with the changes to the schedule of benefits that would help the City reduce claims costs for' r 1993, and minimize future medical costs. SUMMARY: On Noverrrber 3, 1992, the City Council authorized staff to finalize the health insurance re-rate and changes to the schedule of benefits to ensure the 1993 rate increase was within the 15°6 budget increase approved by the City Council, Upon the completion of our negotiations with Philadelphia American Life on the rate increase and changes in benefits, we re-bid the program to give other insurance carriers the opportunity to submit a quote on the new schedule of benefits. The bids were duo on November, :5. Philadelphia American submitted a bid for a plan design and premium quotes that are within our proposed plan design changes and costs for 1993. No other insurance ;arriers resoondod to our bid requests. Exhibits I shows the proposed plan schedule. Exhibit 11 disolays the premium rates for 1993. The proposed benefits chances for 1993 were discussed with the Employee Insurance Committee. Members OT the Committee agreed by consonsus to recommend that we implement Philadelphia American Life's proposed plan and rate increases. BACKGROUND: On November 3, 1993, staff prnsented to the City Council an update regarding the performance of the health insurance plan since the transition to Philadelphia American Life's program in January 1, 1992, tie informed the City Council that access to medical services Improved under the current program. However, plan costs increased due to high utilization and increased claims costs. Staff proposed a new plan design for 1993 that would help the City contain future medical claims costs and the resultant rate increases. The changes would also provide adequate benefits to employees and their dependents. The new plan design (shown in [xnibiL I) would encourage an active partnership with the City, employees, and medical providers in monitoring, and preventing utilization patterns that r,ouid Council on Employee Health Insurance Program Memo to city December S, 1992 Page 2 of 3 ,opts to adversely affect our c)aims experience and ,use future premium Skyrocket. we rebid the program to y ortunitY to bid the new Plan As a result of the change in c biduthe health insurance program, a insure that other carriers are given the opportunity that meet$ ouraidfound design on Novel ber 12, with a p osed American life's bid 's prop Philadelphia s, Wearhavefreviewedonded Philadelphia within specifications. with our bid requiremenaea t~~epremiums are it in complete compliance Thus, it is staff's 93 for 1993• al of our 1993 benefits meet the roved recommended budget schedule for 19 + ouncil's app the City C Council au recommendati thorize the renew on that theiatAmer•ican life. contract with Philade}ph our November 3, 1993, that indicated to the City Council during owls As we we are developing some cost-coogaa With strategies goal City Council, presentat'ion+ ssibilitY Of integrate some elements of prop ll for P Lor99ai+ng the Po with the health habits, ro ~Sa for for the health insurance p loan. 1° who it, risky Pees ps part °fincenteveshtonempanYe do not engage such providing ing those who practice while ericourag habits. D GROUP AFFECTED: full-time and part PROOR_9~5+.-DFPAftTM~NTS R--""-- 807 employees The City's Health Insurance Program covers all regu a ' tly, - time City of Denton employees in all departments. Curren are covered on the program. ro osed F I SCA.I__ IM~'ACT i, approved T budget for 1992/93 artments at a 15% rateh app The City bud:aetad del bid is within t philadelpi,ia American Life's Respectfully Submitted: / tt yd V. Harrell City Manager h i December 8, 1992 Memo to City Council on Employee Health Insurance Program Page 3 of 3 I Prepared by: "4~' Thomas W, Klinck, Director Human Resources Approv d; set can cu ive Director Mu ipa1 1 es and Economic Develooment Exhibits ccpalg3b,prn 12/01/92 92 r 7 EXHIBIT I PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF BENEFITS EFFECTIVE 01/01/93 a CITY OF DENTON sE VICE EETWCRK NON NgTWORK Physician's Office visit $15 per visit plus $50 Deductible plus 40% of copay for diagnostic schedule plus an services. over schedule, any cunt Preventive Care Well Baby $15 per visit plus 50 (Recommended copay for diagnostic Not covered. services. Routine $15 per visit plus 50 Immunizations copay for diagnostic services. Annual Health $15 per visit plus 50 Assessment copay for diagnostic $Employes/Covered services. Spouse 35 years or older. Includesi Chest X-Ray, Urinalysis, EKO, Blood testing, Well Woman Exam Annual (once every $15 per visit plus $50 Not covered, 12 months) copay for diagnostic services, Routine Vision, speech, _,y> Bearing screening 0 through age 17 $15 per visit plus $50 Not covered. col>a.y for diagnostic services. In-8ospital Services (1) No limits on $500 deductible, SOOT medically necessary $300 per admission days deductible plus the non- network deductible plus Must be pre- 40%. certified by Intracorp (A) Semi-private roam All necessary hospital services - - - - - h 1~~11~~~1) M 00 L+.1'~ p -NEdTW~ ~ D~ l of vcwO4` 40% h{bit 1 Ex Deduct lgl Charges • AV eli9Lb 9 l00% atse¢t gos4ite1 5~5 Per vLeiti a Plus 40% nt amog g+tKpviCws Treatment QeduCU1belPluO any Surgery or vsaLt P ,0 ig0 cv r Oche dul Lesion Lty cave 505A9ef°r diagn 5300 etib1. PaCLble Pleb, yMte iana visits ServsCes yes 100% tBta°rk ai~eble char9 4hYssC 5500 deductsb a0% °f bla Charges, In~xOSPLtal 5ervicea 40% of elred No additional coPay. Not cove {i Nursery l2) covered Newborn Sezvspes Lago 100% phYsKgwb°rn 00 re 5~5 Per vsgsti t or E'►°K9° ofr Cri ae 100% ~In en get and 38 ous it Per visits 15 Per viothe lus 550 tot zl ~KoaPLor U 3: e at eca a Por vidtagn°IgO ati 50 ceervscos~ Lf any a or Coosa t (3) I SIS f°r ~sLCLans office sQQvLces• phY 1us 40% t Ln at®y1Ce Qeducti el PLus 1e altuls~ ntal a $50 schedulof schedu 14eneal se ~W sbbstan0s visit noetLc excess ad~L0001%e non" t~einess Of 515 PA for dia9 5300 Peble Plus % of ti 1$ abuse) a 0ftisce eeevices ble 100% r eletw°s9Lbk1 e Charges' q0% of 4li phlsLCLan' 31 55p0 deduCtL t le Plus ~ Lt s1 X31 Deduc~Le charges, 1n the KosP $50 eLLgL Igo sly per dia(3 petiC Not covered. coPaY cefor `e• ?aYaiCal T-00vspy eet.ti service Nor Covered, on zaaed j ovided• lue $50 mw ?lapping $IS Ye tots diacgj Lc i1stY gstvs°sa oeoerviCee. ipf a I M Exhibit I A(J811~a1101T1'S- 7-° SERVICE ETWO NON-NEINORK outpatient Hospital cv Cv d services Surgery or Treatment $75 per visit, 100% Deductible plug 408 of eligible charges. Maternity care Physicians Viaits $15 per visit plus $50 Deductible plus 408 of copay for diagnostic schedule plus any amount services. over schedule. In-Hospital Services $500 deductible, 1008 $300 per admisaion deductible plus non- network deductible plus 408 of eligible charges. ' Newborn Nursery (2) No additional copay. 406 of eligible charges. Physicians Sarvicee Covered Not covered. for Newborn Emergency or Urgent Care (.rn cape of Accident or sudden and Serious Illness) Hospital Emergency $75 per visit, 1008 $75 per visit, 1008 Room or Urgent Care Facility (3) Phys7,cian's Office $15 per visit plus $50 $15 per visit plus $50 copay for diagnostic copay for other services, services, if any. Mental Health/Substance Abuse (serious mental ss-ar illness or Substance abuse) physician's office $15 per visit plus $50 Deductible plus 408 of (3) copay for diagnostic schedule plus amount in services, excess of schedule. In the Hospital (3) $500 deductible, 1008 $300 per admission deductible plus the non- network plus 408 of eligible charges. Physical Therapy $15 per visit plus $50 Deductible plus 408 of copay for diagnostic eligible charges. services. Family Planning Based on Service Not covered. provided. Infertility services $15 per visit plus $50 Not covered, copay for diagnostic services. P Alpnrja NO yam} (J I Exhi'oit > Aantlalte)n_5 SERVICE NETWORK NON-NETWORK ~f Detection L correction $15 per visit plus $50 Deductible plus 404 of ~~JJ Of Body Distortion copay for diagnostic eligible charges. services. Prescription Drugs $150 deductible) $5 Not covered. copay, generic; $15 copay, brand. Maintenance Drugs up to 100 days supply) Not covered. one copay. 7111 other Eligible Deductible plus 208 services Annual Deductible $500 plus a $150 drug $1,000 deductible. Coinsurance* $2,000 (not including 408 up to $6,000 plus $15 office visit copay) amount In excess of per diems 6 schedules. Lifetime Maximum* $lH $1M h *Family Limit is three (3) times individual maximum. Out-of-Service Area Residents For covered persons who reside outside service are (50-mile radius of City of Denton) plan of benefits is $500 deductible plus 80% of eligible charges up to a $2,000 out-of-pocket maximum. important Notesl 1. An additional $500 deductible will be applied if a }capital stay is not pre- certified by Intracorp. No benefits are available for days which are not determined to be medically necessary. 2, No additional copayments are necessary while mother and child are confined at same time. 3. An additional $500 deductible will be applied if a hospital stay to not pre- certif led by integrated Behavioral Health (I8H). No benefits are available for the days which are not determined to be medically necessary. d i AgundaNo.__._~ EXHIBIT II PHILADELPHIA AMERICAN LIFE PROPOSED EMPLOYEE PREMIUM RATE FOR 1993 j Coverage *Enrollment New Rate Employees' City's Cost Cost Employee Only 361 $201.25 $11.50 $189.75 Employee + Spouse 83 312.80 123.05 189.75 Employee + Childrei 179 270.25 80.50 189.75 Employee + Family 184 391.00 201.25 189.75 Total 807 * Enrollment figures may change due to open enrollment and/or employment activities PROPOSED RETIREE PREMIUM RATES FOR 1993 RETIREES UNDER__66 MONTHLY- 008T Retiree Only $272.62 Retiree and Spouse 526.73 RETIREES 65 OR OVER (ON MEDICARE MONTHLY COST Retiree Only $ 92.55 P. on Medicare 189.73 palrat93.prn I .i _CITY- CQUNCIL a tl. o°°°oaooaaa O°O^ ~ H''opp0 ~ . t cy ` x p ' c~5 r a o°O O ~pa°~hro *INC) CIZY_COUMCIL RtPORT _~ORM_A_T AQ1Afll$No, A"I TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNC;i{ Ik#P® ; FROM: LLOYD V. HARRELL, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CITY LEASE OF ANNEX BUILDING OFFICE SPACE U 324 EAST MCKINNEY STREET DATE: DECEMBER 3, 1992 }c-0- ENDATIQN: Bruce Henington and Debra Drayovitch recommend that the City Council approve the proposed agreement between the City and Joan Cohagen, Rickye Earl Coleman and Patricia Pennington for continued use of office space at 324 East McKinney Street. SUMMARY: The City has two departments housed at this leased facility. Primarily, this agreement has two differences from the previous one. It is a 7- year lease with a 9-month termination clause with a requirement that the City rebuild the outside parking handicap ramp according to ADA requirements. B CKQFtW_RO: As of 12/31/92, the current agreement will end. The proposed agreement will accommodate the Human Resources and Information Services departments until other City space becomes available. PROGRAMS __REPARTMEN 5 GRUUPS AFFECTED: Finance, Facilities Management, Municipal Services/Economic Development, Human Resources, and Information Services FISCAL IMPACT: The budgeted amount is $90,428 for the agreement, and the ramp completion will be done as an in-house project. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: Lloyd V. Harrell, City M agar PREPARED BY: u4He gt on 3uperfntendent of Facilit as Management APPROVES: Betty McKean, Exec6t1ve Director Municipal Services/Economic Development ABB00149 Agontla No a 4= ~ ~6lontla Ifenr~~ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT PROVIDING FOR THE LEASE OF OFFICE SPACE AT 324 EAST MCKINNEY STREET) AND DECLA EFFECTIVE DATE. RING AN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I That the City Council of the City of Denton hereby approves an office lease agreement btween the City and Joan Cohagen, Rickye Earl Coleman and Patricia Pennington for office one..,:e at 324 East McKinney Street in accordance with the terms t,iereof, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. SECTION That the expenditure of funds pursuant to the base is hereby authorized. S CTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of _ , 1992. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY, APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: AAAOOB6A Pol ,J y TJ AAA0096A C Z OFFICE LEASE AGREEMENT entered Into by and between eement is made and al corporation located at kye This lease agr Texas, a municTexas ("Lessee"), and cjoan the City of Denton' Denton, Texas, and R Of 215 East McRinneY Street in Denton County, Cohagen an individua l residing the Estate Of and Patricia Pennington Executocs of , Earl Coleman ect ivelY, "Lessoru). Earl L. Coleman (coll agreements herein of the mutual covenants and Lessor does in consideration valuable consideration, lease and other good and and Lessee does here, usable set forth, lease to Lessee, square feet at 324 East hereby demise and ce comprising 6,465 building office spa floor of the Called the ,leased from Lessor, the first space, located on Texas, and hereinafteY McKinney, Denton, premises". ARTICLE 1. commence at 12:01 midnight 9n of this lease shall 100 midnight on December 31' 199more December 31, term 1992, and end at as hereinafter to earlier termination sub'3eCt~ however, i particularly described' )f the uiet possession ossession of the lease thereof Lessor shall on the commiaCemLessee tin q term of this re the enti leased as hereinabove set. forth, p same during ' premises and sha secure in the quiet against all persons lawfully claiming the ' tensi lease term and any exons thereof. ARTICLE 2. East Texas, Denton, each the amount of $7,.00 Lessee shall pay Lessor remat 31 isesr oak ay of ,each 539month. pre on the first as rent for the leased month, which shall be payable reed by and between the parties cancel and terminate this hereto that lease upon It is further the Lessoesmayd an to gLessor.. nine (9) months written notice ARTICLE 3. purposes, °nly for office pure to us Lessee will use the leased premises and rsstrict their operationsf authorized agent shall give including data processing p a different rfor Lessor ,E' such PI use. l r prior written Lconsent shal Lessee p Lessee and norubllc th of and Lessor agrees that at all times e area the immediately have the unobstructed use of the 1 AAAOOB6A ' ISm ~r~(f,k PEA. OFFICE LEASE AGREEMENT This lease agreement is made and entered into by and between the City of Denton, Texas, a municipal corporation located at 215 East McKinney Street, Denton, Texas ('}Lessee"), and Joan i Cohagen, an individual residing in Denton County, Texas, and Rickye Earl Coleman and Patricia Pennington, Executors of the Estate of. ,I Earl L. Coleman (collectively, "Lessor"), In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein set forth, and other good and valuable consideration, Lessor does hereby demise and lease to Lessee, and Lessee does hereby lease from Lessor, office space comprising 6,465 square feet of usable space, located on the first floor of the building at 324 East ' McKinney, Denton, Texas, and hereinafter called the "leased premises". ARTICLE 1, The term of this lease shall commence at 12:01 midnight on December 31, 1992, and end at 12:00 midnight on December 31, 1999, subject, however, to earlier termination as hereinafter more particularly described. Lessor shall on the commencement date of the term of this lease as hereinabove set forth, place Lessee in quiet possession of the leased premises end shall secure it in the quiet posses: ion thereof against all persons lawfully claiming the same during the entire lease term and any extensions thereof. ARTICLE 2, Lessee shall pay Lessor at 31.8B East Oak Street, Denton, Texas, as rent for the leased premises, the amount of $7,539.00 each month, which shall be payable on the first day of each month. It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the Lessee may cancel and terminate this lease upon nine (9) months written notice to Lessor. ARTICLE 3. Lessee will use the leased premises only for office purposes, including data processing operations, and restrict their use to suet, purposes unless Lessor or Lessor's authorized agent shall give Lessee prior written consent for a different use. Lessor agrees that at all times the Lessee and public shall have the unobstructed use of the area immediately north of and d A~onda No for repairs to air conditioning and heating systems for the leased premises unt31 the termination of this lease. B. Notwithstanding the other provisions of this Article, Lessee shall construct one ramp on the premises to be accessible to the disabled and, if necessary, two door knobs on the outside front door of the building on the premises, to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Lessor shall remodel, within 30 days of Lessee's request, one of the water closets to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Lessee agrees to pay one-half of the cost of such remodeling, within 30 days of mailing of an invoice from Lessor, if Lessor has first furnished an estimate of the cost of such * remodeling to Lessee and Lessee agrees to the cost. If Lessee does not agree, Lessee and Lessor shall agree each to pay half of the costs as provided to an estimate prepared by a constructor doing business in Denton. ARTICLE 7. Lessee shall not make any alterations, additions, or improve- ments to the leased premises without the prior written consent of Lessor. Consent for no;^tructural alterations, additions, or improvements shall not be unreasonably withheld by Lessor. Lessee shall have the right at all times to erect or install furniture and fixtures, provided that Lessee complies with all applicable governmental laws, ordinances, and regulations. Lessee shall have the right to remove at the termination of this lease such items so installed; however, Lessee shall, prior to the termination of this lease, repair any damage caused by such removal. ARTICLE 8. Partial destruction of the leased premises shall not render this lease void or voidable, or terminate it except as herein provided. If the premises are partially destroyed during the term of this lease, Lessor shall repair them, when such repairs can be made in conformity with local, state, and federal laws and regulations within sixty (60) days of the partial destruction. Rent for the premises will be reduced proportionately to the extent to which the repair operations interfere with the normal conduct of Lessee's business on the premises. If the repairs cannot be so made within the time limited, Lessor has the option to make them within a reasonable time thereafter, not to exceed thirty (30) days and continue this lease in effect with proportional rent rebate to Lessee as provided for herein. If the repairs cannot be so made in sixty (60) days and if Lessor does not elect to make them within the reasonable time thereafter, either party hereto has the option to terminate this lease. If the building in which the leased premises are located is more than one-third (1/3) destroyed, Lessor may, at Lessor's option, terminate the lease whether the premises are damaged or not. PAGE 3 WAN ARTICLE 9. Lessee agrees not to assign or sublease the premises leased, any part thereof, or any right or privilege connected therewith, or to allow any other person, except Lessee's agents and employees, to occupy the premises or any part thereof, without first obtaining the Lessor's written consent. Lessee's interest in this lease is not assignable by operation of law, nor is any assignment of its interest herein, without Lessor's written consent. ARTICLE 10. Lessor shall pay and fully discharge all taxes, special assessments, and governmental charges of every character imposed during the term of this lease on the leased premises or any part thereof. ARTICLE 11. Lessee shall have the right to erect signs on any portion of the leased premises including, but not limited to, the exterior walls of the building. Lessee shall remove all signs at the termination of this lease, and shall repair any damage and close any holes caused by such removal, ARTICLE 12. Lessee shall permit Lessor and their agents to enter into and upon the leased premises at reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting the same or for the purpose of maintaining or making repairs or alterations to the building. ARTICLE 13. If during the term of this lease or any extension or renewal thereof., all of the leased premises should be taken for any public or quasi-public use under any governmental law, ordinance, or regulation, or by right of eminent domain, or should be sold to the condemning authority under threat of condemnation, this lease shall terminate and the rent shall be abated during the unexpired portion of this lease, effective as of the date of the taking of said premises by the condemning authority. If less than all of the leased premises shall be taken for any public or quasi-public use under any governmental law, ordinance, or regulation, or by right of eminent domain, or should be sold to the condemning authority under threat of condemnation, this lease shall not terminate but Lessor ahall forthwith at their sole cx-- pense, restore and reconstruct the building and other improvements, situated on the leased premises, provided such restoration and re- construction shall make the same reasonably tenantable and suitable for the uses for which tho premises are leased. The rent payable hereunder during the unexpired portion of this lease shall be adjusted equitably. PAGE 4 h ~I ADmda lfow ---z~S Lessor and Lessee shall each be entitled to receive and retain ~p /p such separate awards and portions of lump sum awards as may be allocated to their respective interests in any condemnation proceedings. The termination of this lease shall not affect the right of the respective parties to such awards. ARTICLE 14. Lessor will not permit any mechanics' lien or liens to be placed upon the premises or the building or improvements thereon during the term hereof, and in case of the filing of any such lien Lessor will promptly pay same. If default in a ment p there continue for twenty (20) days aftor written notice thereof sfrom Lessee to Lessor, the Lessee shall have the right and privilege at Lessee's option of paying the same or any portion thereof without inquiry as to the validity thereof, and any amounts so paid, including expenses and interest, shall be an indebtedness hereunder r, due from Lessor to Lessee and shall be repaid to Lessee immediately on rendition of bill therefor, together with interest at nine (9$) percent per annum until repaid. ARTICLE 15. Lessor is expressly given the right to assign any or all of its interest under the terms of this lease; provided, however, that Lessor agrees to give thirty (30) days written notice to Lessee of such assignment including the name and mailing address of such assignee. ARTICLE 16. If Lessee shall allow the rent to be in arrears more than fifteen (15) days after written notice of such delinquency, or shall remain in default under any other condition of this lease for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice from Lessor, Lessor may at its option, with notice to Lessee, terminate this 1 lease and take possession of, said premises without being deemed guilty of any manner of trespass, and relet the premises or any part thereof, for all or any part of the remainder of said term, to a party satisfactory to Lessor, and at such monthly rental as Lessor may with reasonable diligence be able to secure. Should Lessor be unable to relet after reasonable efforts to do so, or should such monthly rental be less than the rental Lessee was obligated to pay under this lease, or any renewal thereof, plus the expense of reletting, then Lessee shall pay the amount of such deficiency to Lessor. ARTICLE 17. If Lessor defaults in the performance of any teem, covenant, or condition required to be performed by Lessor under this agreement, Lessee may elect either one of the following: FACE 5 4 (a) After not less days notice to Le Lessee may rem .iy s chi default {by )any necessary actionssor,~ in connection t,z;h such remedy may pay expense and employ counsel; all sums expended or obligations Lessee in connection therewith sh incurred by all be Lessee on demand, and on failure of su ch ireimbursement,~ Lessee may, in addition to any other right or remedy that Lessee see may have, deduct the costs and expenses thereof from rent subsequently becoming due hereunder; or (b) Elect to terminate this agreement on giving at least thirty days notice to Lessor of such intent Ion, thereby term inating this agreement on the date designated in such notice. i ARTICLE 18. Should Lessee, or any of its successors in interest, hold over ofe his ilease~runle sa otherwise aafter tin writintion of the term over shall constitute and be construed as tenancy from suchmonth holdito month only, at a rental equal to the rent payable for the last month of the term of this lease plus fifty (50$) percent of such amount. construed aseLessor' s a the receding for Lessee to s hold nover hall not be ARTICLE 19. All notices provided to be given under this agreement shall be given by certified mail or by hand delivery, addressed to the proper party, at the following address: IE SO : I&SSEE: Joan Cohagen 328 B East Oak C215 ity Manager Denton, Texas 76201 East McKinney Denton, 'texas 76201 ARTICLE 20. (a) This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the 'h benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, legal represen tat assigns where permitted by this agreement, ives, successors, and (b) This agreement shall be construed under and in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, and all obligations of the parties created hereunder are performable in Denton County, Texas. (c) In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision thereof and PAGE 6 cz n~.nda llA~r~._ this agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or ~fd~( /U unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. (d) Thi3 agreement constitutes the sole and only agreement of the parties hereto and supersedes any prior understandings or written or oral agreements between the pal ties respecting the within subject master. (e) No amendment, modification, or alteration of the terms hereof shall be binding unless the same be in writing, dated subsequent to the date hereof and duly executed by the parties hereto. (f) The rights and remedies provided by th sremedy agree meet are cumu" ative and the use of any one right or by ither or all other party shall nct preclude or waive. its right to use any in addition to any remedies. Said rights and remedies are given other rights and parties may have by law, statute, ordinance, or otherwise. (g) No waiver by the parties hereto of any default or breach of any term, condition, or covenant of this same eorh any other deemed to be waiver of any other breach the term, condition, or covenant contained herein. (h) In the event Lessor or Lessee breaches any of the terms of this agreement whereby the party not in def cult employs attorneys to protect or enforce its right hereunder nd prevails, then nathe defaulting party agrees to pay the other Party reas attorneys, fees so incurred by such other party, (i) Neither Lessor nor Lessee shall be required to perform any term, condition, or covenant in this lease so long as such performance is delayed or prevented by force majeure, which shall mean acts of God, stripes, locko oivimarerial or labor , andstrictions by any governmental authority, the of of Lessor or Lessee and any other due diligence, Lessor or Lessee is cause not the oexercise within reas which, by unable, wholly or in part, to prevent or overcome. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Lessor and Lessee hereto execute this agreement as of the day of LESSEE JOAN COHAGEN, RICKYE EARL COLEMAN CITY OF DENTON, & PATRICIA PENNINGTON, LESSORS PAGE 7 a~o~da Iteio_ 2S ~,_~/a APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM; DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY RICKYE EARL COLEMAN -/D v BY. PATRICIA PENNINGTON PAGE 8 -pro 1 I1 - -VITY COUNCIL A i - i - I ~ I- ogoO~~Qq JGGGQ DODO A 4F .Q ~ y p S~ c o TODD T0Nd S EiM`,J GLDq~~~O . oOQQdQ i Ag~ No. CITY of DENTON, TEXAS AiUN1ClPAL AU1L.DlNG / DEN70N, TEXAS 76201 i TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 CITY COUNCll, REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager DATF: October 23, 1992 SUBJECT: Corinth cfor},theeimpoundment'randeDiCity of sposition~rof'rCats and Dogs of and the City RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends the adoption of a resolution authorizing the City to enter into the agreement. SUMMARY: The agreement states that the City wt11 provide certain services to the City of Corinth. T1ie City will hold animals picked-up by the Animal Control Officer from the City of Corinth and animals brought to the Animal Control. Center by hours residents of Corinth. These animals will be held foy ninety-iirs )the if not claimed by an owner'. At the end of the ninet aix (96) hou animals will be euthanasized or put up for adoption. The City will. hold animals that are possible rabies suspects for ten (10) days. 't'ile City will. remove and ship the heads of rabies suspects for testing by the Ttxas Health Department, For these services the City of Corinth agrees to pay the fees set forth in the agreement. Six dollars ($6.00) per day per animal being held for an owner to claim, Seven dollars 00.00) per day per animal being held for rabies observation, Fifteen dollars ($15.00) for each animal euthanasized, Thirty-five dollars ($35.00) for each decapitation and shipment. BACKGROUND: The City of. Denton begirovrdin this service toothe Cityh of Corinth i.n _October, 1991, During fiscal y' paid the City r•i Denton four thousand, four hundrLd, finals,tweneyyssixd(96)rs ($4,426) for sheltering one hundred fifty-seven (157) acnouthantiqlzed, and zero causee a condition of) ov~ies er-crowding shipped atotheec'en14 These which - l Agenda Ifarn - S Page 'l ~ any PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, GROUPS AFFECTED: Animal ConCrol- Division City of Corinth FISCAL IMPACT: it is estimated that revenue from this program wilt. be approximately HL, namo as in the prioe fiscal year which would be a projection of lour thousand, four hundred dol.l.ars ($4,400). RESPECTFU" Y SIMMUTED: 4/~. Lloy V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by; Nonie Malo-Kull, Mangy e Environmental Health , rvices ;Ap ro b y. ty i e. n cutive rector fcr MunicipaL Services/l4eonomic Development ALL003AA s l RESOLUTION N0. CUTE, ON BEHALF OF THEICITY H F DENTON,FANHINTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF CORINTH FOR THE THE HOLDING AND DISPOSING F DOGS IANDNCATS SFOR THE ITYOOF CORINTH; , 1 AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Corinth desires to obtain impoundment and disposition services for dogs and cats for the citizens of the City of Corinth; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton has facilities and personnel train- ed to provided these services; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES! SECTION I. That the Mayor of the City of Denton is hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the City of Denton, Texas, an interlocal agreement with the City of Corinth, Texas for the pro- ich is attached cats fore thesCityaofdCorwith inth,h a copy of whand disposing of vision of hereto. SECT ON II. This resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. day of _ r 1992. ~ PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY! APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY C.~ ( BY: I Aj mi d8 No AAAOOEBA THE STATE OF TEXAS § INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT i COUNTY OF DENTON 5 WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas and the City of Corinth, Texas, are both municipal corporations with the authority and power to contract; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is engaged in the services of holding and disposing of dogs and cats for the benefit of the citizens of Denton; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is the owner of certain vehicles, facilities and equipment designed for the transporting, holding and disposition of dogs and cats and has in its employ trai personnel whose duties are related to the use of such vehicles and equipment; and WHEREAS, the City of Corinth desires to obtain impoundment and disposition services for dogs and cats rendered by the City of Denton, as more fully hereafter described, for the benefit of the residents of the City of Corinth, Texas; and WHEREAS, the provision of impoundment and disposition of dogs is of n mutual function the.vcontracting ipartiesh; and cats is a and welfare and governmental and WHEREAS, the City of Corinth and the City of Denton mutually desire to be subject to the provisions of Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Art. 4413 (32c), The Interlocal Cooperation Act and contract pursuant thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Corinth and the y as of Denton, follows; for the mutual consideration hereinafter stated, agree I. A. COVENANTS OF THE CITY OF DENTON The City of Denton 1, Holdinq_of Dogs and Cats. agrees to accept and hold dogs and cats lawfully impounded by authorized representatives of the city of Corinth and to accept and hold dogs and cats brought to and released to the center from residents of the under then following terms areas and of the City conditions of Corinth PAGE 1 ~L^ (a) Holding Period for Dogs and Catb, The City of Denton agrees to hold such dogs and cats for a period of ninety-six (96) hours from the time they are accepted by the Animal Control Center, unless such animal is released to the Center by the animal's owner, in order to allow the owners of the impounded animal a reasonable amount of time to reclaim the impounded animal. If the animal is not reclaimed within the ninety-six (96) hour period, the ownership of the animal shall revert to the City of Denton and the animal will be held for adoption or humanely destroyed. Animals will be humanely destroyed or placed for adoption at the discretion of the Animal Control Supervisor. f} (b) Holding Fees for Impounded Dogs. For the purpose of this Agreement, the City of Denton will charge Six Dollars ($6.00) per day holding 1 fee for each day that an animal is held at the Center. This fee will be assessed against the owner of the animal at the time the animal is reclaimed. No animal will be released until all applicable fees are paid in full. (r;) Holding of Quarantined Animals. The City of Denton agrees to accept and hold rabid suspects in quarantine for the City of Corinth when conditions permit, and such action is authorized by a representative of the City of Corinth. (d) Holding Fees for Ouarantined Animals. The holding fee for quarantined animals shall be Seven Dollars ($7.00) per day for each day that the animal is held. (e) Head Shinmanlrs and Rabies Testing. Upon request of the City of Corinth, the city of Denton will provide for the removal and shipment of the heads of rabid suspects for r.linical rabies testing at the Texas Department of Health. The fee for this service shall be Thirty-five Dollars ($35.00) for each head shipped. B. COVENANTS OF THE CITY OF CORINTH 1. Financial Responsibility. In order to reimburse the City of Denton for its costs incurred under this Agreement, the City of Corinth agrees to pay for the holding fees and euthanasia fees on all dogs and t PAGE 2 i T A!'~antlaItorn cats received from the incorporated areas of the City of Corinth or its authorized agent if the animal(s) is not reclaimed by its owner. These fees will be assessed on the following basis: (a.) Euthanized Animal $6.00 per day holding fee for four (4) days for each animal $24.00 $15.00 Euthanasia Fee 15.00 Total Fee $39.00 (b) Adopted Animal $6.00 per day holding fee for four (4) days for each animal $24.00 (c) Head Shipments $35.00 2. Ths City of Denton will collect impound fees from i thq owners of dogs and cats received from the incorporated areas of the City of Corinth. Impound fee monies will be applied to fees owed the City of Denton by the City of Corinth for animals not reclaimed by the owner. IMPOUND FEE 1st Impoundment - $20.00 2nd Impoundment - $30.00 3rd Impoundment - $45.00 4th Impoundment - $67.00 3. The City of Corinth agrees payment shall be made within forty-five (45) days of receipt of invoice by the City of Corinth. IT. The City of Denton agrees to and accepts full responsibility for the acts, negligence, and/or omissions of all of the City of Denton's employees, and agents, the city of Denton's subcontractors, and/or contract laborers doing work under a contract or agreement with the City of Denton in performance of this agreement with said City of Denton, The City of Corinth agrees to and accepts full responsibility for the acts, negligence, and/or omissions of all of the City of Corinth's employees, and agents, the City of Corinth's subcontractors, and/or contract laborers doing work under an agreement or contract with the City of Corinth in performance of this agreement with the City of Denton. PAGE 3 4r3aadaltorn__~~'/~ It is further agreed that if claim or lability shal arise from £lie joint or concurring negligence of both parties hereto, it shall be l~ borne by them comparatively in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, This par.agra;)h shall not be construed as a waiver by either party of any defenses available to it .tnder the laws of the State of Texas. It :.s understood that it is not the intention of the parties hereto to -reate liability for the benefit of third parties, but that this agreement shall be for the benefit of the parties hereto, III, The fact that the City of Corinth and the City of Denton accept certain responsibilities relating to the collecti.,n :n.nd impounding of dogs and cats under this agreement as a part of their responsibility for providing protection for the public health and welfare and, therefore, makes it imperative that the performance of these vital services be recognized as a governmental function and that the doctrine of governmental immunity shall be, and it is hereby invoked to the full extent possible under the law. Neither the City of Denton nor the City of Corinth waives or shall be deemed hereby to waive, any immunity or defense that would otherwise be available to it against claims arising from the exercise of governmental functions, IV, The term of the Agreement shall be for a period of one (1) year commencing as of October 1, 1992 and ending September 30, 1993, Thereafter, this agreement shall be renewed for successive additional one (1) year terms commencing on October 1 of each year if the City of Corinth and the Cit, of Denton agree in writing on or before the first day of October to a successive term and the amount of consideration to be paid hereunder for each successive term; provided, however, either party may terminate this Agreement, upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other. V, I This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the City of Denton and the City of Corinth and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations and/or agreements, either written or oral. This agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both the City of Denton and the City of Corinth. PAGE 4 VI. This Agreement and any of its terms or provisions, as well as the rights and duties of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas. VII. In the event that any portion of this Agreement shall be found to be contrary to law, it is the intent of the parties hereto that the remaining portions shall remain valid and in full force and a effect to the extent possible. VIII. r' The undersigned officer and/or agents of the parties hereto are the proper.,y authorized officials and have the necessary authority to execute this Agreement on hehalf of the parties hereto, and each party hereby certifies to the other that any necessary resolutions extending said authority have been duly passed and are now in full force and effect. EXECUTED in duplicate originals this the day of CITY OF DENTON BY: BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH CITY ATTORNEY BY: PAGE 5 T 9~y CITY OF CORINTH, TEXAS BY, J` c- 4er~Shirly Sp 1+1r g ATTEST: , Maynr City of Co inth, Texas Nor1R-Sh'e1ds, City Secretary City o Corinth, Texas I J~ 1 PAGE 6 4-CITY::, { 0- IT-T COUNCIL . 1 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TTIT T 71 - - - TX- ` - ~ oo~oaoao aoo. 000 0 ~ o P oo 00 , ~ ~ °o a o ~ n . O d g p i + O aaaaocon - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r rise . ~..:.1.. TON TEXAS n?uNrcrPAL Burr orNO / oErlronl, TEXAS 78201 / TELOEPC (817) 566-6307 C1fy ma ager CITY of DEN MEMO R"-%lrTDMM hloyd V. Harrell, City Manager T0: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager FROM: DATE: December 3r 1992 operation of the Exit Ramp at SUBJECT: Resolution for contint+ed the Union 76 Truck Stop nt of lution that would support the Texas Departmeat the Attached is a resoThe .resolution also Transportation's efforts look at rebuilding the ramp and (1-35/U.S. 17exit untilp,these studies Union 76 Truck leaving p the ramp pe supports completed. construction can be Comp ueations, I would be happy If you or the Council has any further q to try and answer them. Rick Sveh a Deputy City Manager RS:bw AMM00iFD i 1 ALL003BF Aipida RESOLUTION 00. A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ENCOURAGING THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT Of' TRANSPORTATION T T RAMP FROM INTERSTATE HTOHINSUR5 THE ''',JNTINU.F.D EXISTENCE OF AN E TO U.S. HIGHWAY 77; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Denton is concerned with the needs of the traveling public through portions of the City of Denton; and it is in the best interest of the City of f Dent ectoac WHEREASp citizens ns and members of the traveling public to have dir 35 to U.S. Highway 77; and from Interstate Highway WHEREAS, the Texas Department of Transportation prr evlo ampubey the supported the City of Denton in and kU.S.i Highway 77 open; NOW, THERE- tween Interstate Highway 35 and FORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: S=ON 'I, That the City Council of the City of Denton sup- ports the continued operation and U.S Highway e71sting exit ramp between interstate Highway SEC=N II. That the City Council of the City of Denton re- for a newly submit Feder constructed Administration ion of aTransportation quests the Texas Federal Highway 35 and U.S. Highway 77. exit ramp between Interstate Highway SECTIggILIII. That the City Council of the City of Denton will continue to support and assist the Texas Department of Trans- U.S xistenc ighway of the exit ramp be- portation to insure the continued tween interstate Highway 35 S CT ON , That this resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. day of , 1992. PASSED AND APPROVED this the BOB CASHEBEay, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: r ~.I "ITY COUNCIL r. - ooooo°°°o°F ° F a~oa - - ~oo oaa~ o' vaoc @fsd~A No Date: December 8, 1992 CI)'X gOUNCIL RZPORT~_k TO: Mayor and members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. harrull, City Manager SUBJECTt consider appointments to the Airport Zoning Commission: RECOMM-L&QU_1_0_t The Airport Board recommends Rick Woolfolk, Allie Miller, George Gilkeson with John Dulemba as alternate, Planning and Zoning commission recommends Ivan Glasscock, 'Richard Cooper and Melvin Willis. "MMARX: In June 1991 City Council adopted Ordinance #91-089 which provides ipal Air ssion for the creation of tho The ts°ixMmember commis ort ion cmp ises ithree (see attachment #1) ' . current members of the Planning and Zoni~he CC ty~~C unoil and tEach members of the P..!'Pnrt Board appointed by 1 and ending member is appointeO.for a one year term commencing July June 30. zn accordance with state Law (Section 241:016 of the Local Government Code) the Airpo t Zoning commission shall (i) Recommend and the ions the boundaries of the zon .3 establ prelimina y repo t gandthold for those zones, and prepare public hearings on the r t .rt before submitting a final report to the City council. B CKGRO N : Early this year the city contracted the services of Coffman Associates, Airport Consultants to pas papart of re an A the Mao aer ev Plan. plan is A draft Airport Layout 'Plan (ALP) 1993. Staff will commence schedule) for completion in Jaluary, Commission prepare wor hazard Airport thek hewith ight the Vg .D X2 LNTS 4R GROUPS FFECT~: Moq_% Public Works, Utility and Planning and Development. Property Airport owners in the vicinity of the Municipal r SC _IMPACT: Respect lly submitted: ~--G t l G~iLGG Preparod by: T,~oyd V. Harrell City Manager Harry.ff, Persaud, AICP Senior Planner Approved: G ran H. Ro bins, AICP Executive director Planning and Development Attachments: 1. Ordinance 491-089 providing for the creation of an Airport Zoning commission. 2. Recommendations of the Airport Board 3. Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning commission. ATTACHMENT 1 k-._- ORDINANCE NO. _ I( 'Lift l__ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ABOLISHING THE DENTON CITY-COUNTY JOINT AIRPORT ZONING BOARD; AMENDING CHAPTER 3 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO PROVIDE FOR THE CREATION OF AN AIRPORT ZONING COMMISSION? SETTING FORTH THE POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, WHEREAS, in 1980 the City of Denton and County of Denton estab- lished a joint airport zoning board to make and enforce airport hazard zoning regulations and compatible land use zoning regula- tions in accordance with State law; and WHEREAS, the joint airport zoning beard adopted airport hazard regulations; and WHEREAS, the State authorizes cities over 50,000 population to adopt, administer, and enforce airport hazard zoning regulations and compatible land use zoning regulations adjacent to municipal airports, includinq land within a, city's extraterritorial jurisdic- tion; and WHEREAS, State law requires the appointment of airport zoning commissions to make a report and hold public hearings on the estab- lishment or the amendment of airport zoning regulations; and WHEREAS, the Council wishes to abolish the current joint air- port zoning board and create art airport zoning commission to make a report and hold hearings on airport zoning regulations NOW, THEREFORE; THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: 1 SECTXON I. That ordinance No. 80-32, effective April 81 1980, creating the Denton City-county Joint Airport Zoning Board is re-, pealed. SECTION 11. That chapter 3 of the code of Ordinances is amended by adding a new Article IV to read as follows; ARTICLE IV. AIRPORT 20NINO COMMISSION Sac. 3-100. Authority) arestl on. The Denton Municipal Airport Zoning Commission is established under the provisions of Local Government Code §241.016 (Vernon 1988), The Commission shall have the duty to study and recommend the establishment and amendment of airport zoning regulations in accordance with State law, 7 8 r,4~ PJo f ,11PWaIIon?.~s. Sec. 3-101. Composition; chairman, terms. The Denton Municipal Airport Zoning Commission shall have six members, appointed by the City Council.. Three of the members appointed shall also be current members of the Airport Advisory Board and the other three shall be current members of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Each member shall be appointed for a one year term, beginning on July 1 and ending on June 30 of the following year, or until a successor is appointed. The Commiasion shall select a chairman and may adopt rules for the conduct of its meetings. SECTION JIT. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approv1. PASSED AND APPROVED this the~J pay of 1308 CASILEBERRX, MAYO ATTEST; JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY, APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMI DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY PAGE 2 n \ n \ ATTACHMENT 2 .J v-~ to U _CITY O DE'NTON DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT M E: M 0 t DATE: October 16, 1992 TO: harry Persaud, Senior Planner M FROM: Joe Thompson, Airport Manager SUBJECT: Denton Municipal Airport Zoning Commie-:pion Pursuant to your memorandum regarding the Denton Municipal Airport Zoning Commission, the three Airpoi°t Advisory Board Membero who will serve on the Airport Zoning Commission are as follows: Rick Woolfolk, Allie Miller and George Gilkeson. With John Dulemba as an alternate. if you need further information, please contact my office. Sincerely Joe 'Thompson, Airport Manager City of Denton TEl.EF'HONE- 8171383-1736 V 1 /1,183.7702 - 0/1"N ME.T11U 434.2579 NUUTE.. 1, BOX lot) 17ENTON, H-XAS 16200 ~llatrlalttttn.__~~ "9 . ATTA(AfAJ 3NT 3 f) it+ P&Z Minutes November 11, 1992 Page 7 j R A U,~"11 FM 2181 approximately one-half mile north of Ryan Road, Notices were mulled to property owners within 200 feet; one reply form was received in favor of the petition and none in opposition, 1 Staff Report; Ms, Fesharl presented the staff report (attached). Petftloner; Bud Johnson of Corinth stated that he purchased the property and - intends to put In it home and live there many years raising cattle, No one was present to speak in favor or in apposition to the petition, Recommendation; Ms, Feshnri stated that staff recommends approval of Z-92-028, Chairman E;ngelbrecht closed the public hearing, Mr, Glasscock moved to recommend approval of Z-92-028, Motion was seconded by Mr. Cochran and carried unanimously (7.0). 1V, Hold a public hearing to consider rezoning it 6.052 acre tract of land from Planned Development 69 to the Office District on property located tit the northwest corner of West Oak and Bonnie Brae, known as the Vintage Retirement Center. V. Consider recommending appointments to the Airport 1° onutg Commission. Mr, Bngelbreeht stated that at the last mccting, Mr, Glasscock and Mr. Cooper agreed to be on the Airport Zoning Commission. Just prior to this meeting, Mr, i Willis agreed to serve as well, Motion was made by Ms, 1-iticy, seconded by Mr, Cochran, and It till n1tnously card(,.(] (7.0) to recommend that Mr, Glasscock, Mr. Coolner, and Mr. Willis be appointed to the Airport Zoning Commission,