Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1992 - 1994
Q r; I do NaT ~'rLM.~Ht4 a ~Ti 1 H~AA THY9,,,,~4 1 5 5 E'4 0 ) 4 c3 I t~RReSB •NInHO1 s STATEMENT N0, t 000008 4055 Intemeuona Ptua, auras QOo PAGE 1 FORT WORTH, TEXAS r5toa4995 TELEPHONH oil735•raoo City of Denton Joe Thompson, Airport Manager Denton Municipal Airport Route 1, Box 100 Denton, Tx 76205 DATEt 12/07/94 ACCOUNT NO.t MV93226 PROFESSIONAL 99RVICESt In connection with Amendment No,3 to the Agreement for ftgineering Services between tho City of Denton and Freese and Nichols, Inc, for Airport Improvements related to 1000' Runway and Taxiway Extension, Notice to Proceed letter dated September 15, 1993, for Items T11,8, and I11,C, STATEMENT FOR SERVICES DURING PERIOD 10/01/94 THROUGH 10/31/941 Preliminary Phase PERCENT OF CONTRACT TASK FEE PEROEAVT COMPLETE 4815:1 37,556,00 100.00 $ 37,556.00 Final Design Phase PERCENT OF CONTRACT TASK FEE PERCENT COMPLETE 35,56 27,517,00 100,00`' $ 27,517.00 Bidding Phase PERCENT OF CONTRACT TASK FEE PERCENT COMPLETE 5,24 i4 41056,00 100.00 $ 41056,00 Construction Phase PERCENT OF CONTRACT TASK FEE PERCENT COMPLETE 9,17 7,097,00 5.00 Close-Out Phase PERCENT OF CONTRACT TASK FEE PERCENT COMPLETE 1,50 1,160,00 100 $ ,00 FEE EARNED TO DATE 69,483.76 LESS PREVIOUS PEE $ 69,128.91 CURRENT AMOUNT DUE $ 354.85 TOTAL,AMOUNT DUE $ .,.,'354 85 ?6b~ 6 0 - e r A C E N 7 U R Y O F S E R V'I'C E 1 8 9 4 1 9 9 4 rm f'R~66RHIOHdL9 November 10, 1994 Mr. Thomas R. Barber Vice-President Suwnount Corporation P.O. Box 1770 Roanoke, Texas 76262 Lear Mr. Barber; Enclosed are seven copies of Change Order No, 1 to your contract with (fie City of Dentoll, for work under A.IP Project No. 3.48.0067.04, at Denton Municipal Airport. ' Please execute ttll copies 11110 forward to Rack Svehlu at lire City of Demon for execution, Mccuted coples will be returned for your {Iles and for your supilly, If you lulve [illy questions, please feel free to call ma at (817) 735.7360. Sincerely, FRF 'SI AND NICHOLS, INC. Gerald Musick, P.17, • ca hick Svehltt Assistant City Manager city or Denton 215 E. McKinney tl Denton, TX 76201 1) IMMAf 1N.%a'r\U'rN CO 1, Kohl I Finaso and Nichols. Inc. Cnginaorx Cnvlronmerllal Solontlats Arch@6018 405511 lornallonnl plaza 80110 200 Fort Worth, 7oxas 70109.4895 617.735.7300 MoIro 817.4291000 Fax817.735,7401 0 Gt d CHANGE ORDER ONE PROJECTi City of Denton Municipal Airport PROJECT NUMBER - DTN93226 OWNERi City of Denton CONTRACTORi Sunmount Corporation. ENGINEERI Freese and Nichols, Inc. CHANGE ORDER NO.; One (1) DAlEi 11/08/94 Make the following additions, modifications or deletions to the work described in the Contract Documents: 1. Change the P-155 Specification thickness TEST requirement for lime treated subgrade from 1 per 300 sq, yds. to I per 700 sq. yds. 2. The Density testing requirement for P-155 lime treated subgrade will be 1 for each 2000 square yards per lift, 3. Change the P•209 Specification lot size for density from 2400 sq,yds, to 4000 sq. yds. 4. Delete Alternate bid item no. 9 "Pressure Grouting" for the bid amount of $17,000.00. Decrease the Contract $17,000,00, 5, Adjust Alternate bid item no. 1 "48 inch RCP" from 660 linear feet to 480 linear feet at the unit price, Decrease the Contract $14,400,00. 6. Silt fence will be paid for at $3.50 per LF for 3100 linear feet, Increase the Contract $10,850.00 7, Hay bales will be paid for at a price of $5.00 per bale for 300 bales. Increase the Contract $1,500,00. 8. Silt removal will be paid for at $35.00 per cubic yard for the first 10 cubic yards. Additional quantities will be paid at the unclassified excavation unit price of $3,55 por cubic yard. 9. Change the topsail on sheet C»20 from 4 inches to 2 inches to match the specifications 1.905, Increase the quantity to 6n2 cubic yards at $6.00 por yard, Increase the Contract $28,332,00 on Old item 21, 10.0elete Schedule I , Alternate I bid items number six(5) and eight(8). Decrease the Contract $92,770,00. 11.Add New Item for installation of 48" pipe in open cut, price shall include all pavement removal and disposal, trench excavation and disposal of earth materials, exist, pipe removal and disposal, furnish ; and install a new 48" RCP pipe per Sunmount letter dated Oct.241 19940 installation of Cem, treated base backfill around and over pipe to bottom of exist, concrete pavement, and replacement of concrete and HMAC per the Oct, 24, 1994 Sunmount letter. This item shall also include any adjustment or replacement of the headwall at the downstream and of the 48" RCP line, Any replacement or damage to electrical cable will be at the expense of the Contractor, The Cement Treated Base material shall have a compressive strength of not less than 700 p.s,i, at 7 days. Portland Cement Concrete pavement shall have a flexural strength of not less than 700 p,s.i, at 28 days or a compressive strength of not less than 6000 p.s,f, at 28 days, HMAC shall be in accordance with Item P-401 In the specifications, Increase the Contract $92,770,00, SUMMARY ($17,000.00) + ($14,400.00) + $10,850.00 + $1,500,00 + $28,332.00- $92,770.OD 4 $92,770,00 a TOTAL CHANGE ORDER AMOUNT; $9,282.00 Y A w I I The compensation agreed upon in this Change Order is full, complete and final payment for all costs the Contractor may incur as a result of or relating to this change whether said costs are known, unknown, foreseen or unforseen at this time, including without limitation, any cost for delay, extended overhead, ripple or impact cost, or any other effect on changed or unchanged work as a result of this Change Order, ATTACHMENT A CHANGE ORDER ONE (1) DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT NOVEMBER 8, 1994, Previous Contract Amount 1,319,7A2,60 Net Change in Contract Amount Revised Contract Amount 1,32g,07A,50_~ Prlevious Contract Time J1Q&A1 dAr Days previous Substantial Completion Date -March 34,-1995L,__ Previous Final Completion Date Much 30, 1995, Not Change in Contract Time --no.-Change- Revised contract time no change, Revised Substantial Completion Date Q, 1995, Revised Pinal Completion Date cg, 1995, 0 Recommended by Approved by FREE AND NICHOLS, INC. [CONTRACTOR] Date bate r~ Approved by ® [OWNER] By bate ii\es~eo\eoU01001 0 Q! Wrirr 11 " E D OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM ATTORNEY/OLTEN'i" CONFYDBNTTAL C0KXUNTCATT0N9 TOi Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM1 Jerry E, Drake, Ur,, Assistant City Attorney SUBJECTi Review Of Airport Runway Extension Contract DATEi October 31, 1994 Se9N~2DENT"TALTTX NOT E1 This memorandum and any accompany- ing enclosures are intended as attorney/client communica- tion between the undersigned attorneys and the city of Denton through its duly authorized constituents. Addres- sees and noted copy recipienta, acting within their offi- oial oapaoitios on behalf of the City of Denton, are the only intended recipients. You are requested to neither divulge the contents of this memorandum to any other pperW son or entity, whether within or without the organiza- tion, nor to use this information for personal benefit. Attached are seven copies of the above contract for your signature" I have not reviewed the contract or bid speoifications in detail, but i have spot checked the contract for compliance with bid speoi- fications relating to bonds and insurance. The bidder has failed to provide builder's risk insurance and steam boiler and machinery insurance, which are both technically required under the terms of the bid. I understand that the inclusion of these items was a clerical mistake made by Freese & Nichols, As shown in the attached memo from Tom Shaw, Engineer Caer,ald Musick of Freese & Nichols has indicated that waiving the builder's risk requirement ""should pose no significant risk" to the City; Tom has also indicated that the cost of the insurance is approximately $2,000, meaning that the failure of sunmount to obtain this ineur- ancs probably did not impact the award of the bid to Sunmount as opposed to any other bidder (T am told by Tom that the next lowest bidder quoted a price approximately $40,000 higher). Also attached e is a letter from Sunmount, indicating that they will not be using any equipment for which steam boiler and machinery insurance would provide any coverage" Max tells me that there f ; adequate insur- ance to handle foreseeable risks, as things currently stand" "lhdlruird !o Qua!!1y Sc»Ico" ® C1 fr I Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager October 31, 1994 Page 2 As in times past, I have signed off approval on the contracts, sub- jeot to the warnings contained in this memos There is an argument that 9unmount's bid is technically unresponsive to our bid invita- tion, such that the next lowest responsive bid should be selected. Again, x suspect that a legal ohallenye is unlikely, given that the next lowest bid is approximately Y401000 higher, and given that the missing insurance is unnecessary to the pro eat and solely the result of a clerical error, Accordingly, 1 will leave it to your discretion as to whether you wash to sign the contract despite this legal deficiency, <W Jerry E♦ ra ci Jr. attachments pat mom Shaw, Purchasing Agent Max Blackburn, Risk Manager APPROVEbi CGS! Do ra A. prayo tah iMI...n~.•. Y NYr Wy.} WIJiJU"! 41.':: 0 r 1 1 l 1f f1 S 1 fi fff 1 i M- r CITY ofDENTJNi TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING DENTON,TF.XAS70201 +TELFpNONg(817) 5&68307_ Oise of the CI1y Manager MEMORANDUM TOi Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager FROMt Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager DATEI October 21, 1994 SUBJ'ECTj Airport Runway Extension Yesterday, we held a preconstruction meeting with the contractor for the extension of the runway, With the lengthening of the runway, the °localizer." is also going to be refurbished, This instrument is used to send out a radio signal that helps airplanes get to the Denton Airport, It is particularly useful when visibility is low. Because of the construction and because of its sensitivity, it has to be taken out of service since machinery moving in front of the radio beam would effect it, we have discussed at length trying to work around the "localizer" with the FAA officials, and they are convinced that we must take it out of service during the construction. Total length of the construction project in 150 days, We have visited with the contractor about timing and how fast he can move. The contractor has pledged that he will work as quickly as possible to get the construction work finished no the "loealizer" can be reset, We wanted to make sure that Council is aware of this in case they get any calls from the tenants, As we said, this will affect any users of the airport on inclement days when the cloud cover is within 200' of the ground or visibility is less than a half a male, This "localizes" allows planes to fly that close to the ground ® either vertically or horizontally in an effort to make a landing, council should also know that we do have other systems at the airport that will allow pilots to still got quite close to the airport, The other systems will allow pilots to fly within 400, of the ground and one mile in horizontal distance to our runway to look for it, if they cannot see it at those distances, then they would have to break off their landing attempts here and fly to 0 another airport with batter visibility or better instrumentation, We expect the contractor to begin work in the first part of November. We will be advising all of the tenants of these Pedle(lI ed ra Quatto,.Sep-Ne" • n Lloyd V. Harrell October 21, 1999 Page 2 necessary changes, As mentioned, with the contract Wing 150 calendar days, we would expect completion to be in early spring, This is the preferred time for the construction aince the runway will also be shortened during construction, shorter runways used more effectively in cooler weather, However, cooler weathare er also means we have a chance for more inclement weather, 11 I wanted you and the Council to know about this, as mentioned before, in case you get any calls, If T can answer any further questions, T would be happy to do so at your convenience, yak s hla C~17~7~ Deputy ty Manager ROW AMM005BO I >n A 9 d N Y U n Y d p s e R V I t~ I Seplember 9, 1994 Fp6easwtoHOLs SF f .I k ) .91994 UI>t:. f Rick Svehla . Assistant City Manager City of Denton 2151?, McKinney Denton, TX 76201 1 RT3; Denton Municipal Airport Runway Extension Denr Mr, Svehla In accordance with your request, Freese and Nichols, tae. is pleased to submit this contract modification for additional services associated with the Denton Municipal Airport, The additional work Is assoeiNed with replacement of Runway 17 localizer, In previous correspondence (June 17) 1994), we agreed to continue the runway extension design realizing the Issue associated with All, funding. Since that time, It became necessary for Freese and Nichols to design the Iocollzer replacement, It is our understanding that the City of Denton will be able to pay up to $14,000 toward the final design effort, The balance of the design and - construction phases fee will be pald by the federal grant or by the City no litter than July 1, 1995, as specified in our June 17, 1994 letter, Our fee to provide the design and construction phase services for the localizer replacement Is $5,979. Attached Is it summary of tasks and manhours to acid to the original design package, The final fee for the runway extension is $77,386, Las u )llo Amount Stratus Preliminary Design Phase $37,556 Complete & Paid Contract Phases 111,13 & 11LC (Lt1mp Sum) Final Design through Closeout $33,851 Active, No Payment Phase Contract Phases IILD (Lump Sum) to llLO Addillontd Services for $ 51979 Active, No Payment r Localizer Replacement (Lump Sum) I'OTAL $77,386 t'roose and Nichols, Inc Lnalneera.r Lnoronmonlal Sclontlats .r.<, Archllacts 4055 Intorriallonal Plaza Stifle Poo v° rorl Worth, Toxaa v 70100.405 017.7357300 - Maim 817.4?.0.1000 i:: rax x17.735.1491 r 0 r 0 y~. I .I.~A )nrl Mr, Rick Svehla September 9, 1994 Page 2 1 The Freese and Nichols design for the replacement localiker provides for the removal of the existing localizer natenna, replacement of a new foundation and new cable from the localizer shelter to the antenna, The FAA will be responsible, for re•lnstnNing the antenna and performing the necessary flight checks to certify ilia localizer, Since alignment of ilia antenna 1s critical, the City of Denton should inchide time for a survey check before and after construction to confirm proper location and alignment, We are pleased to provide these additionul servlces. Two copies of this supplemental agreement are provided for your approval, Please rol u•n one signed copy for our records) If you have any questions regarding the scope of work or ilia fee please feel free to call, As always we arc available to meet with you and discuss this, fit further dotal], if you wlgh, Very truly yours, APPROVED. IiRI3101 AND NICNOL$.,_fNC, CITY' OF DENTON Name, TI Anthony Reid, PI[ w Senior 'Vice President Title: Dale: Attachment xe: Joe Thompson JMl l JI1V DTN93226 U'I'NyJ22G\'11\La7~kUN WAYaxJ1.l+ ~.+.w. a._..++~+u ✓w. , ~ .r✓I. •w.w. w'WL"J~' I ♦ r i t 0 Ga i r FEE SUMMARY DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT LOCALIZER REPLACEMENT SEPTEMBER 6,1994 ACTIVITY PIC P M ENQR V ENGR TECH SEC TOTAL Labor t, FAA Coord, 2, Drawings (4ea,) 2 10 2b 307 , Cost Est. _ 1 - _ 2 - - - d 4. Spam 6, pre-Bid - 1 - - - - 6, Const Phase - - _ - 18 - _ - _1-6 7, PM/00 'rota! Hours 3 31 11 26 2 72 Labor Effort $346 $2,976 $847 $1,450 $70 $5,688 Expenses 1. Travel $15 2, Computer $16 3, CARD $260 4. Prlntfng $10 Total Expenses $291 TOTAL $5,979 W 1 1 L C> r CITY of D NTON, TEXAS MUN101PAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 666.8307 Office of the CHy Manager MEMORANDUM TOt Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager FROMt Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager DATEt September 1, 1999 SUBJECTt Extension at the Airport Last Friday, we met with representatives from the FAA to talk about the extension project. The same bill that you mentioned to the Council in The Week That Was this wank is the bill that has the Airport Improvement Program (ATP) funds in it During that meeting, the FAA advised us to move ahead with bidding the improvements. We have received those plans from Freese and Nichols and currently are getting those out for bid, Mike Nicely felt that, we would receive a grant offer before October lat. That meads we would have to approve the grant and award the bids in a very short time frame. We are advertising the bids and will receive them on September 20th. That would allow tin to receive the grant offer and award the bid on September 27th which is a Tuesday night, There is an outside chance that the FAA may have to go right to the wire this fiscal years i,e, September 30th before they get all of their paperwork and notifications to be able to make the offer to +itj, There could be a chance that rather than F meeting on the 27th, we may have to call a Special Call meeting as late as the 30th for the grant acceptance and the award of bide, if this causes a problem, or if we need to look at a different scenario because of Council's schedule, we would like to be able to communicate that information to the FAA. if we do not make the September 30th cutoff date, there would be a significant delay, That would mean that the improvements would not be finished by late spring next year which could hamper operations, Therefore, we think it is in our best interest and our tenant's to try to expedite this if possible. We have also talked about, all of the in-kind services, as well as, expenditures that we have made prior to this, We are in the process of verifying all of those for the FAA, We expect that to equal about $80,000-$90,000, As we mentioned, we would be able to 'Vedleated to Quollq, Setdre" ,y A Ga f i a i Lloyd V. Harrell September 1, 1994 Page 2 use that, as part of our 10' match for the grant. Using that, we would expect the remainder of the grant match to be about $140,000- $150,000, if you or the council has further questions, I would be happy and try to answer them at your convenience, tt ck Sveh a Deputy City Manager RS;bw AMM0056A • kb - , l~ AUG 09199a DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CITY OF DPNTON MEMORANDUM TO: RICK SVEHI,A, DEPUTY CITY MANAatR PROMS JOE THOMPSON, AIRPORT MANAGER DATES AUGUST 8, 1994 SUHJLCTs RUNWAY EXTENSION Rick on August 3, 1994 Qorald Music Of Freese & Nichols Engineering and myself met with the Federal Aviation Administration, We discussed the localir,er antenna construction cost estimates which will be inaluded in the cost as a separate item, whioh can go out -as A separate bid, when we start the runway extension construction, See attached estimates that the FAA gave to Gerald Music, Sincoroly, Joe ompson, Airport agor JT/dhh 940808 TEI.EPHONE: 817/383.7736 - 817/383.7702 VIFW MCTRO 434.2629 nourt 1, BOX f00 DE'NTON, TEXAS 76206 F. 1 4 f {l ` {f it J 1i ( f X'r df f r li 5,.:( i, yf 5ti - - - - - - - , l G) ♦ DATE April 21, 1994 REMINDER KENO WORKORDER Avoid Errors put it in Writing i 701 ROUTING SYMBOL Kelvin Soloo ASY-421 SUBJECTS Denton Looaliter Cost Estimates i In responso to a verbal request from you I am submitting the following cost estimates for the localf2sr antenna removal and installation at Denton, This work will be associated with the runway extension, CC2 Engineering r. $2,000 CC4 Electronic Installation - $31,000 CC$ Flight Inspection - $25,000 The CC2 estimate is based on 6 mandays 6 9400/day for design review i support, The CC4 estimate is based on 70 mandays ! $400/44y + $3,000 for materials, The CC5 estimate is based on 10 hours 1 $2,500/hour, This estimate assumea the following That it will not be necessary to one the Technical Support Services Contractor to perform the electronic installation That all construction work will be completed by others That ASN=453 will not be inspecting construction work to a resident engineer That ASN-453 will not perform any of the construction work such as trenching or grounding. ® ?_h '0 + A 44 SIGNATURE r ROUTING SYMBOL ohm Schumacher ASH-463T, Extension 4635 ~~~V+yr ur.4N~..rY ~ ~ ..AyM FMVF Iwd'1~w1~- i ~ ~l'-' • i s v C1Ty of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL 9U)LDING DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPhONE (817) 566.8200 MEMORANDUM TO: Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager FROM: Rick Svehle, Deputy City Manager & Executive Director for Engineering DATE: July 7, 1994 SUBJECT: FAA FUNDING OF THE 1,000 FOOT EXTENSION TO THE SOUTHEND OF THE EXISTING RUNWAY Last week the FAA contacted us to discuss poselbilitles of funding avaiiabiilty this fisoai year for tho extension of our runway to 6,000 feet. Mike Nicely, from the FAA, Indicated that these is a good ohenoe funding would be available if we could complete our engineering drawings, Based on that conversation, Friday we had a conversation with Freeze & Nichols who previously sent us a letter Indicating that the total cost for preparation of the final plans and their Involvement In the project, would be 933,000. We were reluctant to come to the Council with the suggestion that they allocate another 833,000 on the chance that funding would be avellable, Therefore, we approached Freeze & Nlohols In a different manner, We suggested to them that this is more of a partnership whereby they get work and we get a project funded mainly by the Federal Government, What we are suggesting to them Is that we fund approximately 913,000 to 915,000 at this stage, For this Freeze & Nlohols would provldo all of the plans, speolfloations, and take/revlew the bids This would than allow the plans to be finished and bide taken In a very short time frame, and to most the FAA requiremonto, Freeze & Nichols would be paid the balance of their fee only 6 after the FAA had awarded us our grant, Freeze & Nichols has Indicated a wlllingnsss 0 to do this. s Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager July 7, 1994 Page 2 I We will have another meeting with the FAA on Tuesday, July 12, 1994, to review the ~ feet track time table that Freeze & Nichols has proposed, If the FAA thinks that this j time table Is agreeable, and the money would be evallable before October 1, 1994, I we have to move quickly, Since this expenditure would be lose than 91500, you have authority to make this commitment, We are suggesting that we be able to give Freeze & Nlohois the go ahead If everything is fine with the FAA We have checked with Legal and they think that this would be okay, especially If the Council passes an amendment to the Contract', We would propose this action and the amendment to the Council at their July 19, 1994 meeting, We would not pay the 916,000 until we received the plans which will be of tar July 19, 1994, Thus, we would then be able to move forward with freeze & Nichols prior to the 19th, and be able to meet the scheduling requirements of the FAA, One last note, the Way the amendment would be structured Is that Freeze & Nichols would agree that this Initial expenditure would be all that would be paid to them until the grant was approved, At that time they would add the remainder of the their coats back In so that we could count that the remaining costa as, part of our ten percent (10%) match, Therefore, our only expenditure until after the grant was awarded, would be this Initial 915,000. The rest of the, expenditures would be made after the grant had been offered and accepted by the Council, I know thle is a rather fast track stem, but Indloatlone from the FAA are that we need to move as fast as possible, If the Council has problems with this approach, I would like to know by July 12, 1994, Otherwise, I would propose to move ahead, If you or the Council has any questions, please contact me at your convenience, Sinoe , f~fok Svehla, Dsputy City Manager & Executive Director for Engineering ® Koh r• • AMM0060F. a o ~ s A G N T U A Y 0 fs S' U N .Y i G r1 June 17, 1994 JUN 2.1 1984 Rick Svehla Assistant City Manager 215 p, McKinney City of Denton Denton, TX 76201 i RE: Donlon Municipal Airport Runway Extension Dear Mr, Svehlal In response to your request concerning the completion of design for the Denton Munfclpal Airport Runway Extension, Freese and Nichols is pleased to muke this response. We are aware of the funding issue associated with the AIP process and agree that continuation of design Is in the City's best Interesi,,Freme and Nichols Is willing to complete the remaining design and await AIP funding for our fee payment; However, if AIP funding is not made available for some unexpected reason, we would request that full remuneration for services rendered would be paid to Freese and Nichols by the City of Denton no later than July 1, 1995. The remaining fe3 to complete the dcsign, bidding base, construction phase and project closeout Is $33,851 as Identified In Amendment Number 3 to the Agreement for Engineering Services between the City of Denton and Freese and Nichols, Inc; for Airport Improvements, Runway and Taxiway Extension (1000'), dated December 20, 1988, If this agreement Is acceptable to the oily of Denton and upon your Notice to Proceed, we will finalize the runway extension design and be ready to advertise for construction within 45 days As always we are available to discuss this proposal In further detall If you desire, It Is a pleasure to continue providing engineering services for the City of Denton, Very truly yours, r FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC, T. Anthony (told, ,1, A Senior Vice President • i xc, Joe Thompson orr.W~at~tn~t,rn~xsvra u~tn,l~ rroeso and Nichols, ino, SngfnOOre ;fi Cnvlronmooal scientists Ph. Archilecis 4055 Inlorna110001 MUM It' Su110 240 6; POrl Worth, Texas itt 761004606 817.735,7300 Morro 817.420.1500 ;a Pox 617.736.7461 • ra A' C E N.T'U R Y O F S E R V I C F,' 1'"8 9 4; 1 9 9 4' Ph& WNM ~t`fctll.'jJt1/rj~t May 16, 1994 Knrgess`kroHOr s j I PIAY 1 t;1994 Joe, Thompson clrT n{~,r ac F, ~ ~r sir 1 Airport Manager SOW Airport Road Denton, TX ; 7205 Dear Mr, Thompson) Freese & Nichols Is preparing prellminary plans for the extension of Runway 17/35. In order to make that extenslon, the localizer will require replacement since it Is a non- frangible unit no longer In compliance with FAA criteria, After meeting with the FAA, It hag been determined that the localizer can remain In its present location, but it must be franglbly mounted, It is our understanding that Freese & Nichols will provide as'a part of these Improvements, the foundation for the new localizes, FAA will at a later date, Install Ihenew frangible localixer antenna under a separate contract, Thee new locallzcr is not identified in the FAA Pre-Application for the runway "tension, The estimated cost for this new unit Is approximately $300,000, not Is our estimate and the FAA should be able to provide a more accurate estimate since we do not know what type of unit will be Installed, We look forward to the continued association with the City of Donton and providing professional engineering services for the Improvements at the Denton Municipal Airport Please let us know how we can be of further asslstllnce In this matter, Sincerely • FREESE AND NICHOL5, INC. rJ CC; Rick Svehla, City of Denton Jerry L Fleming, P.E. • Mike Nicely, FAA • • rriNy~z~s~"n~ t.t;7~axT1~.~S1l.r Freese and Nlchola, loo, Engineers Environmental Scloritlala ; Archfleola 40$8 Imernallonal Plaza Suite 200 Fort Worth, Toxas 78109.4898 817.735.7300 Mefro 817.429.1900 Fax 817.738,7491 • i Preliminary Engineering Report Runway 35 Extenslon Denton M'unlclpal Alrport F Frem & Nichols, Inc. May 16t 1994 AA • r ' r- I } Er Runwr/JS F..4f %6M • Donlon ATM List of Shoots 1 Cover Sheet 2 Quantity Summary Sheet 3 Airport Layout Plan 4 Construction Staging and Phasing Plan 5 Drainage Area Map e Layout Plan 7 Layout Plan 8 Layout Plan 9 Layout plan 10 Grading Plan 11 Grading Plan 12 Grading Plan 13 Grading Plan 14 Runway Profile 16 Taxiway profile 16 Storm Drain Profile 17 Storm Drain Profile 18 Lighting Plan 19 Marking Plan 20 Localizer Foundation Plan 21 Localizer Foundation Plan 22 Erosion Control Plan 23 Pavement Details 24 Drainage Details 25 Lighting Details 26 Marking Detalls 1 S#A~y 4A ....__u.ry... .~.m_.._r_.... l.. y IM MwIM... _':M11/IY'Y W't...... . i 4 to ' pumxiy 35 Bteslon•MnWn Ahpm,t Scone of Work This project consists of the 1000' x 150' extension of Runway 35, parallel extension of the South Taxiway, extension of the MIRL, relocation of the VASI, construction of a new localizer bass and replacement of the localizer, Infield drainage, aircraft hold pad and preclsion markings, The proposed pavement section consists of 4" of Hot Mix Asphaltlo Concrete, 14" of Crushed Slone Base and 12" of Lime Treated Subgrade• This pavement section Is based on 1,200 annual departures of a 100,000 pound, dual gear alrcrraft• I The existing localizer antennae will be removed and stockplled and a new base wlll be constructed In the current location after the necessary gradlnq has been completed, It Is planned to relocate one of the existing VASI's to uccomodate the runway extension. The existing runway threshold Ilghts will be removed and relocated at the end of the runway exlenslon and the runway edge lights will be extended, The precision runway markings will be modified to eccomodate the runway ax:Orwior, The Runway extension and other related improvements will be done in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 150/6300.13 for Group II-b alrcraft, with tho exception of the Runway Safety Area length reqUiremant. The existing storm drain at the and of Runway 36 will be replaced by a 48" RCP that will be bored and lacked under the existing pavement. The existing 42" CMP will be removed under the turfed area and filled with grout under the runway. ~ 0 a _ a ~.y r: List of 80e01ficatlons Section 10 Deflnlllon of Terms Sectlon 20 Proposal requirements and Condlltons Sectlon 30 Award and Executlon of Contract Section 40 Scope of Work Sectlon 50 Control of Work Sectlon 60 Control of Materials Section 70 Legal Relations and Responslbility to the Public Section 80 Prosecution and Progress Section 90 Measurement and Payment , Section 100 Contractor Quality Control Program Sectlon 110 Method of Estimating Percentage of Material Within Speelfioation Limits (PWL) Item P-151 Clearing and Grubbing Item P-152 Excavation and Embankment Item P-154 Subbase Course Item P-155 Lime Treated Subgrade Item P•150 Temporary,lor and Water Pollullon, SO Eroslon and Siltation Control Item P-209 Crushed Aggregate Base Course Item P-401 Plant Mix Bituminous Pavements Item P-602 Bituminous Prime Coat Item P-603 Bituminous Tack Coat Item P-610 Structural Portland Cement Concrete Item P-620 Runway and Taxlway Painting Item D-701 Pipe for Storm Drains and Culverts Item D-751 Manholes, Catch Basins, Inlets and Inspectlon Holes Item D-762 Concrete Culverts, Handwalls and Miscellaneous Drainage Structures Item D-754 Concrete Paved Guitars, Ditches and Plumes Item T-903 Sprlgging Item T-904 Sodding Item T-905 Topsoiling Item T-907 Tllling A Rom T-908 Mulching Item L-108 Airport Underground Cable Item L-109 Airport Transformer Vault and Equipment Item L-110 Airport Underground Eleotrlcal Duct Item L-119 Airport Obstruction Llghta r 1 ~FMy91 h, • f r W r Rum y 35 B,lenslon. C!v4W AlryW1 Pavement Destan slgn CBR'(Lime Treated) 26 j [Equivalent slgn CBR (Unstabillzed) 4 lgn Load 100k ar Type Dual Annual Departures 1200 Reuuired Payement Sectlon 411 Surface 1411 Base 1211 S ime Treated Subgrade Lime Treated Subgrade Shall Extend Not Less Than 8' Outside Pavement Edge. Base Shall Extend not Less Than 1 outside Pavement Edge. is M..a M a a 9 0 c ri- / r. a , [ Qr~ a l ; Run my 35 Edenom - Dow Al[pat Fee Summary Probable Estimated Construction Cost $1,6,16,036 Engineering Cost 71,600 Construction Inspection Cost 32,000 i Constructlon Testing Cost 29,000 I Total X1,744,535 43-M~y-Bd a .air a ~ r, , c> • runwAy 35 E&nslon . wnbn Arpai Runway 35 Extension Denton Municipal Airport Statement of Probable Cost a'' ! ear Batt ate en1 No, Desorl t ~n Qua t Unit U No Total 1 Clearing & Grubbing 34 AC $1,500.00 $51,000,00 2 Unclassified Excavatloo 43,700 CY 6,00 218,600,00 3 12" Lime Treated Subgrade 29,600 SY 3.60 103,260 00 4 Hydrated Lime 796 TN 90,00 71;650.00 6 P•200 8ese Course 11,600 Cy 30,00 346,000,00 6 P•401 Hot Mlx Asphalllo Concrete 8,400 TN 45.00 209,000.00 7 Prime Coat 9,700 OL 1.60 14,660.00 8 Marking (Rnflecllve) 10,000 8F 0.76 7,600.00 9 Cable Trench 2,600 LF 0,80 2,000.00 10 Cable 6,100 LF 0.85 4,336.00 11 Llghling Fixtures 15 EA 200.00 3,000,00 12 Tnp9oll 2,000 CY 6.00 12,000.00 13 48" RCP 700 LF $5.00 69,600,00 I 14 36" RCP 600 LF 65,06 39,000,00 15 Sore A Jack 48" RCP 225 LF 160,00 33,760.00 16 Inlet 2 EA 1,800,00 3,600,00 17 Headwall , 2 EA 2,000.00 4,000,00 18 Relocate VASI 1,00 EA 81000100 6,000.00 19 Solid Slab Son 6,000 8Y 8.00 30,000.00 20 Sprigging 5 AC 3,000.00 16,000,00 21 Paved pitch Invert 1,000 SF 3.80 3,600,00 22 Marking Removal 10,000 SF" 0.10 1,000 00 • 23 Locallzer Reconsirucllon 1 LS 300,000.00 300,000.00 TOTAL ! 0 ,00: 12A4yE:1 a 1 lr. . r , II i r ...idrte. r 1 i! r t I1 U1 1 JI i~l fit S[. 1' 2 ii 1993 DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT` CITY Off' DE'NTON M E M O R A N D U M DATE= September 17, 1993 Tot Kristen Newman, Chief Accountant FROM. Joe Thompson, Airport Manager SU83ECTI F,A.A, Grants Per our previous conversation regarding F,A,A, Grants to the Denton Municipal Airport, I have reviewed the following Projeots by Project Number with Mr, Mike Nicely, F,A,A, Accordingly, we would like you to close the following aecountst 1) Project N3-48-0067-03 Development of Southeast Corner. 2) Project N3-48»006704 Replace infield Drainage System, 3) Project N3-48-0067-05 Runway Overlay. 4) Project N3-48-0067-07 Land Acquisition. Please be advised that if there are any remaining funds left in these accounts, they should be rolled into the General Funds Account. Additionally be advised that we only have one (1) Grant that is currently open, Project #3=48»0067-06, the Master Plan project, which should close _approximately December, 1993 (sea • attached brookdown of Grant Summary provided for your information), 1 ~ TR PNONEt 8171389.7736 8171383-7702 01F'W METRO 4342629 ROUTE 11 60X 100 DI-ON, TEXAS 76205 .n...n..ew....~wne._.....♦V. I ! u a,.,". W--+W.:.[ivl • Kristen Newman Page 2 Should you have any questions in this regard, please contact me immediately, Sincerely, Jo omgsonI A rp r alter - City of Denton cc: 'Ka~thy Dubose, Finance Administration Lffick Svohla, Deputy City Manager 0 e ~ e a .µiu..eaw.....MM..w.I.a. ; y ww V au..✓ir1 W rtiili r~ 1Y... t n .j i f GRANT SUMMARY zVEWP SOUTHEAST coRNER - P OJECT 3-4 -0067-03 VENDOR NAME AMOUNT 09NERAL E'mAC~COUN~ 1 Sunmcunt Corporation $226,420,24 P.O. #83560 401002-•AB87.8907 402-002-'AO02-9120 401-002-AS87-6303 2. W.P. Wills Eng. .t_.23,063.00 402-002-Atl42-9120 TOTAW $249,463.24 REPLACE INFIELD DRAINAGE SYBTRM ;PROJECT $ 3-400067-04 VENDOR NAME AMOUNT tlENERAL FUND ACCOUN4'N 1. CBS Mechanical, Inc, $278,774.50 P.O. #12080 402-002-AG03»0001-9108 4.02»002-Atl03«0002-9108 2, Freese & Nichols, Inc. $ 31,275.00 P.O. #97067 402«002-AO03-0001-9108 402-002-A(303-0002_9108 3. irnest/Lewie Trietsch $ 434.00 P.O. #75167 402-002-«A003-0001-9108 4. Rona Rngineers, Inc, $ 7.50 402-002 Atl03-0002»9108 P.O. ,#15166 1-__L3 402-002403.0001-9108 402-002-Atl03»0002-9108 TOTALI $310,821.00 r RCNilAY AVE~►L Y pRgJBCT N 3«48-0067-05 VENDOR AMOUNT tlE~~ FUND A~COUNTN 1. APAC-TEXAD, Inc, $647,099.54 P.O. #30577 402-022-A005-.0001-W7 402-022-Atl05-60x2-9107 0 100022.0019-8907 r 2. 1're9so & Nichols, Ina. $ 62,954.00 P.O. #25766 402»022-AG05-0001-9107 402-022-Atl05.0002-9107 100-022-0019-8907 • r 3. Southwest Laboratories $ 12,083,48 402.022-AG05-0001-9107 P.O. 030713 402-022-AGOS-0002-9107 4. City Engineering Insp. $ 11,219.86 402-022-AG05-0001-9107 P.O. #30713 402.022-AGOS-0002»9107 1 5. Precision Airfield Layout & Striping S. 42,798.50 402-022-Ad05-0001-9107 P,O. #30578 402-022-AGOS-0002-9107 100.022-0019-8907 TOTAL$ $776,155.31 **City of Denton Engineering Inspection Fees were paid from the allocated funds set aside for the Southwest Laboratories P,O.** MASTER PLAN PROJECT 3-48-0067-06 VENDOR NAME AMOUNT GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT# 1. Coffman Associates $150,000,00 402-022-AG04-0001-9151 P.O. #23245 402-022-AG04-0002-9151 TOTAL: $150,000.00 LAND ACQUISITION PROJECT _t 3-48-0067-07 VENDOR NAME AMOUNT 0ENERAL FUND ACCOUNT 1. Strahan & Associates $2,000,00 402-022-AO06-0001-8566 P.O. #23937 2. Lane & Associates $11500,00 402-022-AG06-0001-8566 P,O. #23696 3, Title Resources, Inc. $1,300.00 402-022-AG06-0001-9001 P.O. N 24140 4. Sargent Appraisal Co. $ 666,00 100-041-02OM-8923 • P.O. #11270 5. M.T. Cole Trust $92,271.00 402-022-AC306-0001-9001 6. Ed Wolski/V, Fryman $63,767.00 402-022-AGO6-0001-9001 70 City Court Costs A15Z,50,21 TOTAL: $177,254.21 PLEASE CLOSE THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNT NUMBERS$ • 0 r r ,r 3 ! • • vbk .rl u,,pyoP rP% . . 1~, rsS,j fro 1 i.•;t../! Y.;~{,. J PROJECT GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT 1. DEVELOP SOUTHHAST CORNER OF AIRPORT F-A.A, ProJeot M3-46-0067-03 402-022-A003- (BOND FUND) 401_ 0001 022-AB87-B907 1 2, INFIELD DRAINAGE F-A,A. Project M3-48-0067_64 (Should be used in code 9151 Description Of2A103PAReport)1 3• OVERLAY RUNWAY F,A,A, ProJeot N3-48-0067_05 402-022-AGOB_0001 s , ( bould be used in code 9107 Description o E Al 03P Report) 4• MASTNR PLAN UPDATE F.A.A. Project N3-48'-0067-06 402-022-AG06-0001 5. LAND ACQUISITION F-A.A. Project N3-48-0067-07 402-022-48-AG07-0001 Need Expense Sheet on the following, r 401-002-A1387-8907 (Bond Fund) p-0, M 83560 • ..w.....«N.... r.rulw~w. ,f y ur,->•.WJ'eJS"" ilJ.r•°, • o 0 s G3 i 'r MY of DENWN, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 16201 / TELEPHONE (01,7) 600-8307 Office of Me City Manager June 29, 1993 Mr. Mike Nicely Airport Planning Specialist Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Fort Worth, TX 76193-0611 Dear Mike: As a follow up to our discussions, we have been working with Mike Griffin, attorney for the defendants, on the Cole property and the Wolski/Fryman property, and we have finally got them to sign settlement agreements. As discussed previously, the condemnations and negotiations have been going on for several months We have had the condemnation hearings for the Porter tract, Cole tract, and Wolski tracts, The award for the Cole tract was 849,772 for the acquisition of land and 8420500 for the damages` (total 892,271). The award for the Wolski tract was ;43,287 and ;18,480 for the damages (total 863,767), and the award for the Porter tract was $13,793, All three condemnation cases have been appealed by the defendants, rf we wait for the appeals to be settled to apply for our runway grant extension, we would not be able to start any extension project for several years Having discussed all of this with you in our last conversations, we would propose the following procedurol s 1. The city has struck a compromise on the Cole property and the Wolski property, Those two awards including damages total 8156,038. The cost of attorney's fees, court costs, professional appraiser services, and our in-kind work fatal 821,216,21, making the total costs of land- acquisition 8177,254.21, less the City's lot which equals $17,725,42, making the federal share O 81590528.79, s 2. We are submitting a grant application for 81591528,79 (Grant Application attached) as the 90% YAA share of the total cost. We have on file a letter dated January 21, H 0 , t r CIA • i Mr. Mike Nicely June 29, 1993 Page 2 19930 from Mr. Hugh Lyon indicating a tentative allocation of =150,000 available in project number 3-49- 0067-07-93# From our convoreations, we understand this amount could be increased to cover our application costs of a159,515.69~ 3. The City will agree to acquire the Porter tract of land at the award of 8130793 prior to accepting any grant offer for an extension to the runwayo i.e as a precondition to the extension grant, the City would be required to acquire the property. 4. The City will also negotiate a praliainory enginearing contract with Freese and Nichols to begin the design work for the 11000' southern extension to the existing runway. We would endeavor to have these contracts signed and underway prior to the next federal fiscal year, 5. The City of Denton would then be in a position and willing to accept tentative allocation proposal from the FAA later this fall when you and your staff have a chance to reviey priorities and readiness of the projects. We eagerly _await your confirmation of our application for reimbursement for property acquisition, and wo look forward to working with you on the extension of our runway this fall.' if Sou have any other questions, pleas* contact myself or Mr. Joe Thompson, at your convenience, Sincerely, Rick Svehln Deputy City Manager m Rb=se • AMM002F8 1 Z ' .1 11d I ii r 4 r. r FAA. SlmonWfreese AE. 1900190 r.qv'~'~ MaMn C.NI[hO~f, Rf, ID9b1%4. AND Nichols,N CONSULTING ENGIN11IRS June 22, 1993 { Mr. Joe Thompson Airport Manager, Route It Box 100 Denton, T% 76205 RE: Denton Municipal Airport Runway 6 Taxiway Extension Dear Mr, Thompson, Attached is Contract Amendment No, 3 for the ongineering work associated wlth the 1000' runway and taxiway extension at Denton Municipal Airport. Included in this scope of work will be the following, 1. Localizer coordination with the FAA 2. Extension of the runway and taxiway - 1000' 3, Extension of the M1RL - 1000' 4. Drainage associated with the runway and taxiway extension 5. Replace runway culvert at south end of the existing runway It Is our understanding that the City of Denton is desirous of Freese and Nichols proceeding with the engineering dssociated with. these improvements, We also understand that payment for engineering services will be initially. limited'to $40,000 maximum from the City of Denton and the balance of the fee $31,407 will be reimbursed when FAA funds the runway extension. In the event the runway extension is not funded by FAA within one year of our notice to proceed date, we would then expect full payment by the City of Denton assuming the engineering activities are complete, we look forward to working with the City of Denton on these new improvements that will enhance your airport operations and capabilities, Please feel free to call if you have any questions concerning the attached contract, • Very truly yours, { FREESE AND ,NICHOLS,~INC, T Anthony Reid Senior Vice President xc: RLN JLF JMH File OFf9J~50\TI\LET\RIE6T12CkT,JLF TELIPHON1 017.735-MO 405 INTffNATIONALPLAZA,SUITE200 FORTWORTN,MAS 761094094 - MfTR0R17429-1900 fAK017.730491 M ~A 60 t Q ~ . t .p1 ~ is S'.n IS' rl • v I i AMENDMENT NUMBER 3 DT23 TO THE AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND FRE ESE AND NICHOLS, INC, FOR AIRPOR'T' IMPROVEMENTS RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY EXTENSION (10(10') The Agreement for Engineering Services entered into and on the 201h day of December 1988, by and between the City of Denton (OWNER) and Freese and Nichols, Inc., (ENGINEER) shall be amended its set forth hereinunder, The said Agreement is attached and is hereby amended by the addition of the following to Sections III Basic Services, Section VI, Compensation; and Section VII, Time of Completion, This Amendment describes the entire scope of services to be performed; (1) Extend the runway and taxiway 1000'; (2) Extend the MIRL IWO', (3) Drainnge for runway and taxiway extension, and (4) Replace culvert al south end of existing runway, and shall rend as follows, to wit; III.B ,pasic Service • Study and Report Ptias 1 u any turd 'Taxies:l~I7 tens(on UQQQ') 1, Consult with OWNER: (t) to review the scope of work, (2) to verify the OWNIsR'S requirements for the Project, and (3) to review available data, 2 Advise OWNER as to the necessity of OWNER'S providing or obtaining data or services from others, and assist (lie OWNER in connection with any such services, 3. Provide analyses of OWNER'S requirements for the project, its verified In Paragraph l,, above, Including planning, surveys, site evaluations and comparative studies of prospective sites and solutions. 4. Coordinate with the Federal Aviation Administration (I+AA) the proposed runway extension with the existing Runway 17 I ocallzerl Determine if the locallzer can remnht In place or if II mnst be relocated, If FAA 0 determines the locallzer must be relocated, it preliminary cost to relocate will be estimated along with idendficatlon of other considerations such as extension of improvements Into the Hickory Creek floodplain, two (2) meetings to determine the feasibility of ranking the runway extension and Iocalizer relocation will be held with the OWNER and the IiAA. If the localizer relocation is necessary and is determined to be feasible, it revision to the remtdning scope of work defined herein will be required, t u..1 .......1. ...~•m... a4. 1 I r. •n •...••u, rJ Y:LL •li iY. • yy~ r i i 0 5, Coordinate field surveys to be obtained by the OWNER. Design and/or construction surveys are not a part of the services to be rendered by the ENGINEER. I 6. Provide the OWNER with advice, when requested, with respect to the making of subsurface InvestlgAtions, Including borings, test pits, soil resistivity surveys, and other subsurface explorations; however, the making of such investigations and the interpretations of data and reports by special consultants are not n part of the services to be rendered by the ENGINEER and the cost therefore ehall be paid by the OWNER, The ENGINEER shall monitor and review the work of testing laboratories and inspection bureaus required for the testing or Inspection of materials, witnessed tests, factory testing, etc,, for the Project, but the cost of such laboratory tests or inspection shall be paid by the OWNER, 7. Prepare a Preliminary Engineering Report consisting of but not limited to a general description of the scope of the project (not including localizer relocation), schematic layouts, sketches, and conceptual design criteria with appropriate exhiblts to indicate clearly the considerations Involved and up to three (3) alternative solutions available, and setting forth ENGINEER'S findings and recommendations, The report will set forth the ENOINEE?R'S opinion of preliminary probable costs for the Project, including but not limited to the following, which will be separately itenilzedt (a) construction cost; (b) engineering costs; (c) construction inspection, and (d) construction testing, Two (2) copies will be furnished to the OWNER and FAA for review, One review meeting will be held to review the report for selection of a preferred alternative, The OWNER shall Identify in writing a preferred ahernatlve. IILC, re ' nrf Des ~r PI_ i;i~ After written authorization to proceed with the Preliminary Design Phase, ENOINEER shall; 1. In consulttdion with the Agent, the MA, and other interested parties, on life basis of the accepted preliminary Englnecring Report documents, refine the general scope, extent, find character of the Project, If necessary, _ • 0 e 2 ~a 2, Attend one (1) meeting at the airport site to review the preliminary design, 3. Prepare Preliminary Design documents consisting of final design criteria, preliminary drawings, outline specifications, and a written description of the Project, The ENGINEER shall furnish three (3) copies of the Preliminary Design documents and present them to and review them with OWNER and FAA, 41 Update the existing Airport Layout Plan (ALP) as necessary to comply with }AAA Advisory Circulars 150/5070•6A, Chapter 9 and 150/5300.13, Appendix 7, Transfer the updated existing ALP to a computer aided design and drafting (CADD) format. If a new ALP Is requlred, the ENGINEER will be compensated in accordance with the provisions of Section VI,C Additional Services. The ENGINEER shall furnish the OWNER with three (3) review copies, and upon approval, one (1) reproducible mylar, and ono (1) set of computer diskettes containing a CADD copy of the ALP In AutoCadd Release 12 format, 5. Advise OWNER as to whether additional data or services of the types described In Section IV Additional Services are necessary, 6. Based upon the information contained in the Prellminary Design documents, submit a revised opinion of total project costs, 7. Update the airport's Exhtblt A property map, The ENGINEER shall submit two (2) copies of the map to the OWNER/FAA for review and approval, The approved Exhibit A shall be submitted with the application for federal assistance. III,D, final Design Phase o After written authorization to proceed with the Mani Design Phase, PNOIN12ER shall: 1. On the basis of the accepted Preliminary Design documents and the revised opinion of probable total project costs, prepare for Incorporation in the Contract Documents final drawings to show the general scope, 3 ~eJ.wr .a~~~~M 1 I M Jr~wur.a LLlW[1SY I ~ til1` , , 1 • t) c., W extent and character of the work to be furnished and performed by Contractor(s) (hereinafter called "Drawings") and Specifications, 2, Provide required technical criteria, written descriptions and design data to obtain approval of the FAA, Submittals of applications for permits, obtaining governmental approval for and consulting with appropriate authorities for approval of permits shall be considered Additional. Services and such services provided by the ENGINEER upon request by the OWNER, 3, Furnish a revised opinion of probable total project costs based on the final Drawings and Specifications, 4, Prepare for review and approval by OWNER/FAA (a) contract agreement forms; (b) general and supplementary provisions; (c) bid forms; (d) invitations to bid; (e) instructions to bidders; and (f) other related documents, 5. Furnish for final review three (3) copies of the documents described In paragraph 4 and of the final Drawings and Specifications and present them to and review them In one (1) meeting with OWNER/FAA, 6, Make revisions to the Final Design Documents as may be required after review by the OWNER/FAA, 7, Prepare for review and approval a Construction Management Program as directed by the OWNER,. ENGINEER shall furnish OWNER with four (4) bound copies of the Program, 8, Make amendments to the Preliminary Engineering Report to reflect any revisions to project scope, design rrherla, Total Project Costs and other significant Items that are incorporated Into the Final Design Documents, ENOINEER shall furnish OWNER three (3) copies of the amended • Preliminary Engincering Report, TILE I{ k ;I a After written authorization to proceed with the Bidding Phase, ENOiNL$R r shall. 4 , i ti ; 1 r,+ e 1. Provide OWNER with one (1) original copy of the revised and approved Drawings, Specifications and Contract Documents for bidding purposes. Copies of the Drawings, Specifications, and Contract Documents will be provided by the OWNER, s I 2, Advertising for bids will be performed by the OWNER, 3. Conduct one (1) Pre•bld Conference at the airport to discuss the requirements of the Project with prospective bidders, snbeontractors and suppliers, The ENGINEER shall prepare and distribute minutes of the Conference to the attendees, 4. issue addenda as appropriate to Interpret, clarify, or expand the Bidding Documents, 5. Attend one (1) bid opening at the OWNER'S location, prepare bid tabulation sheets, evaluate bids and recommend bid award. Compile eight (8) executed copies of the contract for construction, materials, equipment and services, 6. Consult with and advise the OWNER concerning the acceptability of substitute materials and equipment proposed by Contractor(s) when substitudon prior to the award of contracts Is allowed by the Bidding Documents, 7. Prepare Application for Federal Asslstnnee and supporting documents Including Exhibit A, Submit one (1) original and six (6) copies of the signed applicatlon and supporting documents to the OWNER. [ILF, Cc>nsttyc~i Iise After written authorization to proceed with the Construction Phase, A I'N(JINEER shall 1. Conduct one (1) preconstruction conference at the airport with representatives of the OWNER, the FAA, the contractor(s) and other Interested parties, The ENGINEER shall prepare and distribute a record of the preconstruction conference to the attendees, 0 5 ..~+.-...rM-.~+wr.M~ ♦ wr.u..uwr. ~6iM1i~`i . rl~.._. ~p~y1., r 0 J _ Ld O w 2. Necessary field surveys for establishing horizontal and vertical controls for the use of the contractor(s) during the performance of the construction shall be provided by the OWNER. 3. Make six (6) visits' to the site at Intervals appropriate to the various stages of construction as ENOINELR deems necessary in order to observe as an experienced and qualified design professional the progress and quality of the varlous aspects of the Contractor(s) work, Based on Information obtained during such visits and on such observations, ENGINEER shall endeavor to determine In general if such work Is proceeding In accordance with the Contract Documents and ENGINEER shall keep OWNER Informed of the progress of the work, The ENGINEER shall endeavor to protect the OWNER against defects and deficiencies in the work of the contractor(s); however, it Is understood that the ENGINEER cannot guarantee the performance of the contractor, nor Is the ENGINEER responsible for the actual supervision of the construction operations or for any safety measures the contractor(s) takes or should take, 4. Preparation of field changes and change orders shall be by the OWNER, 5. Review: (a) samples; (b) catalog anta; (c) schedules; (d) shop drawings; (e) laboratory, shop, and mill tests of materials and equipment; and, other data submitted as required by the Contract Documents, Such reviews will be only for conformance with the design concept of the Project and compliance with the htformntion given In the Contract Documents, The ENGINEER shall provide one (1) copy of documents with review comments to file OWNER, 6, Preparation of periodic and final estimates for payments to the contractor(s) shall be by the OWNER. 7, Conduct, In the company of the OWNER and the FAA, one (1) final inspection of the Project for conformance with the design concept of the • Project and compliance with the Contract Documents, The ENOINEPR shaft prepare, and distribute copies of the findings to the OWNER, the E;AA, and the Contractor, S, The ENGINEER shall not he responsible for a final test and quality ® control report documenting the results of all tests performed, O 6 ~ 0 e c r 1II,G Closeout Phase During the Closeout Phase, ENGINEER shall: 1. Prepare and submit to the OWNER one (1) set of reproducible record drawings on Mylar and three (3) sets of prints showing those changes made ouriuE; the construction process, based on the marked-up prints, drawings, and other data furnished by contractor(s) to ENOINEER and which ENGINEER considers significant, 2, Furnish OWNER with three (3) bound copies of all approved catalog cuts, warrantles, maintenance data, parts lists, and names of equipment And materials suppliers, 3. Conduct one (1) inspectlon of the Project prior to the expiration of any warranty perlod and advise the OWNER of any recommended action to be taken under the terms of the warranty, V11 Cot ensation, Runway and Taxiway Extension (~QOtI ) Compensation to ENGINEER for the work defined above shall be as follows: Basic Services; A lump sum amount of $710407 Addillonal Services Based on Attachment A, Schedule of Charges If requested by the OWNER Any applicable new taxes Imposed upon services, expenses, and charges by tiny governmenlai body after the execution of this contract wlli be added as necessary to the ENGINEER'S compensation, progress payments may be requested by the ENGINEER based on the percent complete, Requests for • progress payments will not be more frequent than monthly, VII. "L u, o" f ConUrl .iio Rumv<7y and-T wily Exte, nsiun (J,QQQI Time of completion for the services described above shall be 150 days O (exclusive of review time) after the Notice to Proceed is received by the • ENOINEER from the OWNER, 7 r • I 1 All other provisions, terms, and conditions of the Agreement for Engineering Services between the City of Denton and Freese and Nichols, Inc,, which are not expressly amended here, shall remain In full force and effect. This Amendment 3 Is executed in two counterparts, on this the day of , 1991, ATTEST. CITY OF DENTON OWNER ATTEST: FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC, ENGINEER • i ® ' I 1. 1 ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE OF CHARGES Staff Member Salary Cost Times Multiplier of 2.3 Resident Representative Salary Cost Times Multiplier of 2,0 Salary Cost Is defined as the cost of payroll of engineers, draftsmen, stenographers, surveymen, clerks, laborers, etc,, for the time directly chargeable to the project, plus social security contributions, unemployment compensation Insurance, retirement benefits, medical and Insurance: benefits, longevity payments, sick leave, vacation and holiday pay appilcable thereto, (Salary Cost Is equal to 1,48 tirnes payroll, This factor is adjusted annuatly,) Other Direct E xZp? v'j Actual Cost Times Multiplier of 1,15 Other direct expenses shall Include outside printing and reproduction expense, communication expense, travel, transportation and subsistence away from port Worth and other miscellaneous expenses directly related to the work, including costs of laboratory analysis, test, and other work required to be done by independent persons other than staff members. Rant s for Inhouse- ~ervi Computer and CAD PC CAD Stations $10,00 per connect hour Interpro $12,50 per connect hour PC Stations $ 8,00 per connect hour VAX Computer $20,00 per connect hour Calcomp Plotter $ 3.00 per plot Print Shop v Bluelines $ 0107 per square foot Offset and Xerox Copies $ 0,07 per single side copy Offset and Xerox Copies $ 0,14 per double side copy OBC Binding (Regular Cover) $ 2100 per book GBC Binding (Emboss, Cover) $ 4,00 per book d 't'ape Binding (Regular Cover) $ 1,75 per book Tape Blriding (Emboss, Cover) $ 3,75 per book 4.22-93 .~~-Yw~1~ wni1~W1 Y YYw4. Yi~W/l '1 ♦ ~I,\•.. 1 r a 11 \ 1 J ri r _ 719 AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES i STATE OF TEXAS f1 COUNTY OF DENTON This Agreement made, entered into and executed this the~' Q~~ da of 1988, by and betare~;n city o entK y Texas, here na ter ca ed tne' Iy It and Freese and Nichols, Inc,, herein. After called the "ENGINEER" acting herein, by and through its reprasentative, -I duly authorized so to act for and in behalf of said ENGINEER. NITNESSETH, that in consideration' Of the covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto do mutually'agree as follows: SECTION I EMPLOYMENT OF ENGINEER The ONNER agrees to eulploy the ENGINEER, and the ENGINEER agrees to perform professional engineering services in connection with the Project as 'stated in the sections to follow, and for having rendered such services, the OWNER agrees to pay 'to the ENGINEER compensation as stated in the sections to follow, The Project `shall include the following improvements to the Denton Municipal Airport: A, SCOPE Or AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS I. Road Access to South Hangar Area* 2. Infield Drainage Improvements 3. Land Acquisition North Utility Runway 17R Clear Zone - 13.5 Acres North Runway 17L Clear Zone - 24,1 Acres South Runway 35R Clear Zone - 31 Acres 4. North Holding Apron ,r A 0 , ca 5, Runway 35-R Extension 1000-Ft. b, Medium Intensity Runway Lights for Runway 35-R 1000-Ft, Extension 7. 'Parallel Taxiway Extension and Holding Apron 8, Stub Taxiway to Southeast Industrial Area 9. Taxiway Lighting - Medium Intensity 10, Commercial Service Area Paving 11, F80 Paving 12, Executive Jet Center Aircraft Parking 13, Other assignments as authorized by the OWNER in writing, *Improvements ineligible for AiP funding SECTION II PERIOD Of SERVICE This Agreement shall become effective upon execution by the OWNER and the ENGINEER and shall continue until the design and construction of the airport improvements described in Paragraph I and funded by the Federal Aviation Administration are completed, However, it is expressly 'understood and agreed to by the parties that ENGINEER shall not commence the services set forth in Paragraph IID- C. and D, unless -(i) the federal Aviation Administration has funded the cost of constructing said improvements and (Ii) written authorization to proceed from OWNER has been delivered to ENGINEER, SECTION fil BASIC SERVICES The scope of basic services for the Study and Report Phase, Design Phase and Construction Phase will be restricted to approved and funded improvements whether a Capital Improvement Project or an AIP Improvement. • Subsequent funded improvements will receive engineering services when notification of allocation or funds are received. The ENGINEER shall render the following professional services for the development of the Project; i e, i A. DEVELOP PREAPPLiCATION Prepare preapplication for submittal to the Federal Aviation Administration for airport improvement and tans acquisition projects eligible to receive Airport Improvement Program Funds. The proJects to be in the application are identified in the Scope of Airport Improvements, paragraph I.A. B. STUDY AND REPORT PHASE After written notice from the OWNER to proceed the ENGINEER shall: 1. Consult with OWNER: (1) to review the scope of work, (2) to verify the OWNER's requirements for the project, and (3) to review available data. 2. Advise OWNER as to the necessity of OWNER 's providing or obtaining data or services from others, and assist the OWNER In connection with any such services. 3. Provide analyses of OWNER's requirements for the project, as verified in Section I11, Paragraph M., including planning, surveys, site evaluations and comparative studies of prospective sites and solutions. 4. Prepare a Report containing 'Schematic layouts, sketches and conceptual design criteria with appropriate exhibits to indicate the considerations involved and the alternative solutions available to OWNER and setting forth ENGINEER's findings and recommendations with opinions of probable construction costs for the Project, which includes estimates of contingencies and allowances for charges of professionals and consultants. Allowances for the cost of land and rights-of-way, compensation for or damages to properties and interest and financing charges will be provided by the Owner or others so designated by the OWNER, all of which are hereafter called "Protect Costs". The alternate solutions shall be limited to not more than three. 6. Furn!sh four copies of the Report to the OWNER. Present and review the Report with the OWNER, 6. The OWNER will select a preferred alternative for each airport improvement. i OWNER and ENGINEER agree that the services contemplated to be performed by the ENGINEER cannot be defined sufficiently at the time of execution of this Agreement. Such services shall be undertaken under the terms of written amendments to-the Agreement executed by MIER and ENGINEER. Such amendments shall be approved by ordinance of the City Council. .3_ i G~ p O. DESIGN PHASE A,`ter written authorization, the ENGINEER shall provide profes- sional services in this phase as follows, 1. Prepare detailed plans, specifications, contract documents, designs, and layouts of improvements to be constructed (surveys to be furnished in Additional Services, Section IV). 2. Provide the OWNER with advice, when requested, with respect to the making of all subsurface Investigations, Including borings, test pits, soil resistivity surveys, and other sub- surface explorations; however, the making of such investiga- tions and the interpretations of data and reports by special consultants are not a part of the services to be rendered by the ENGINEER, and the cost therefor shall be paid by the OWNER, The ENGINEER s6a11 monitor and review the work of testing laboratories and inspection bureaus required for the testing ur,inspection of mtiterials, witnessed tests, factory testing, etc., for the Pro,ie;t, but the cost of-such laboratory tests or inspection shall oe paid by the OWNER. 3, furnish the OWNER, whrn requested, the engineering data necessary for applications for routine permits required by local, state and federal authorities, Preparation of detailed applications snd supporting documents for government grants or for planning advances will oe provided as Additional Services! 4. Submit plans, specifications, and contract documents to the applicable federal ,.nd state agency(s) for approva), where required! 5. Furnish such i~iiormation necessary to utility companies whose facilities may be affected or services may be required for the Project, 6, Prepare revised opinion of probable construction cost and bidder's proposal forms (project quantities) of the Improve- ments to be constructed. 7. Furnish the OWNER six (6) sets of copies of plans, specifi- cations, and bid proposals marked "Preliminary" for approval by the OWNER, Upon final approval by the OWNER, the ENGINEE?, will provide the OWNER forty (40) sets of copies of "Final" pans. As directed by the OWNER, additional sets of plans, specifications and bid documents as are necessary in the receipt of bids for construction and as are required in the .4 execution of the protect, shall be furnished by the ENGINE Ek and shall be paid for by the OWNER at actual cost of reproduction. D. ~ CONSTRUCTION PHASE Upon completion of the design services and approval of "Fil" and specifications by the OWNER, the ENGINEER will proceednwithplans the performance of services in this phase as follows; 1. Assist the OWNER in securing bids, issuing notice to bidders and notifying construction news publications. The notice to ~ bidders will be furnished to the OWNER for p-.iblication in the local news media. The cost for publications shall be paid by the OWNER. 2. Assist the OWNER in the opening, tabulation, and analysis of the bids received and furnish recommendations on the award of contracts or the appropriate actions to be taken by the OWNER, 3. Assist in the preparation of formal contract documents for construction contracts, 4• Assist in conducting pre-construction conference(s) with the Contractor(s), review construction schedules prepared by the Contractor(s), and prepare a proposed estimate of monthly cash requirements of the project. 5, _Make ope visit each month to the site (as distinguished From the continuous services of a Resident Project Represent- ative) to observe the progress and the quality of work and to attempt to determine in general if the work is proceeding in accordance with the contract documents. In performing these services, the ENGINEER Will endeavor to protect the,OWW5R against defects and deficiencies in the work of Contractors; iheN ately he INE Rtoill epor any observed defects or deficiencies ENGINEER does not gguatanteeothee,C4nti Is ractorr'seperformance the is he responsible for supervision of tha Contractor's operation and employees, ENGINEER shalt not be responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction selected by Contractor Or the safety cautions and programs incident to the ;rork of the Contractor, ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any person except his own employees and agents at the Project site or Otherwise performing any of the work of the Project. d i s ~ }rt, .I~r13r d!,\~f c~3 ~a. 4) 6. Consult and advise with the OWNER during construction, make recommendations to the OWNER regarding materials and work- manship, and prepare change orders with OWNER's approval, 7, Review samples, Catalog data, schedules, chop drawings, labo- ratory, shop and mill tests of inaterial and equipment and other data pursuant to the General Conditions of the Con- struction Contract. 8. Assist the OWNER in arranging for testing of materials and laboratory control during construction to be conducted at tho OWNER'S 'expense. g. Interpret intent of the plans and specifications for the OWNER and Contractor(s). Investigations, analyses, znd studies requested by the Contractor(s) and approved oy thr OWNER, for substitutions of equipment and/or materials or deviations from the plans and specifications will be considered an Additional Service. 10. Review and comment on monthly and final estimates for payment to Contractor(s), pursuant to the General Conditions of the Construction Contract) 11• Conduct, in company with the OWNER's representative, a final inspection of the Project for conformance' with the design concept of the Project and general compliance with the con- tract documents, and review and comment on the certificate of completion and the recommendationfor final payment to the Contractor(s). 12, Revise the construction drawings in accordance withthe in- formation furnished by construction Contractor(s) reflecting changes in the Project made during construction. Two sets of prints of "Record Drawings" shall be provided by the ENGINEER to the OWNER. sa:C'f l urr rr A00ITIMIAL SERVICES Additional Services to ba performed by the ENGINEER, if mithorized by the OWNER, which are not included in the above described basic services, are • described as follows; A. Fiold Surveying required for tAe preparation of designs, drawings and plans. 61 Field layouts or the furnishing of construction line and grade surveys. r ~ e. • .,J 6 . y • ~ vr• wua. tiJ.u rtrir[SY' i' h :V It• . r t 1 t i i . ~r . q ~ rrl >s s (r r a sr ' i d~ ' . ~ his `a' ` r.'Y s.~4 ,r1 Ii~~i .1 ~s{~ 1{,l„~~~I ~lN~'I~n~~'1r 1s~Sq,4 Y; .:`e s % v C. Investigations involving detailed consideration of operation, maintenance and overhead expenses, and the preparation of rate schedules, earnings and expense statements, feasibility studies, appraisals, evaluations, assessment schedules, and material audits or inventories required for certification of force account con- struction performed by the OWNER. D. Making necessary property, boundary and right-of-way surveys, 3 preparation of easement and deed descriptions, including title search and examination of deed records; except there will be no additional charge for surveying where the ENGINEER can prepare center-line type descriptions for the procurement of easements along pipeline routes developed from the design surveys for the design of pipeline projects; however, additional surveys re- quired to determine property corners and complete development of descriptions for right-of-way easements will be considered an Additional Service. E. Prepare Airport Improvement Program application and supporting documents for government grants, lawns, or planning advances and providing data for detailed applications. F. Providing shop, mill, field or laboratory inspection of materials and equipment. G, Preparing any required Operation and Maintenance Manuals or conducting operator training and preparing Environmental Impact Assessments or Statements. H. Appearing before ..regulatory agencies or courts as an expert wit- ness in any litigation with third parties or condemnation proceed- ings arising from the development or construction of the Project, including the preparation of engineering data and reports for assistance to the OWNER. I. furnishing the services of a Resident Project Representative to act as the OWNER's on-site representative during the construc- tion phase, if requested by the OWNER. The Resident Project Representative will act as directed by the ENGINEER in order to provide more extensive representation at the Project site during the Construction Phase. The duties and responsibilities and the limitations on the authority of the Resident Project Representa- tive and assistants will be determined by separate written Agreement to be attached as an amendment to this Agreement. As set forth in Section III, D.50 the ENGINEER does not guarantee the Contractor's performance nor is lie responsible for supervision of the Contractor's operation and employees. If the ENGINEERIs requested to visit the site more frequently than one (1) visit each month as set forth in Section III, Paragraph D,5, the requested visits shall be considered as an Additional Service and the BUNKER shall be entitled to additional compensation, A ~ ~ r -7- .-~...m~-~. rill ' O ~ ' S • t ~1) 0 Through more extensive on-site observations of the work in pro- gress and field checks of materials and equipment by the Resident Project Representative and assistants, the ENGINEER shall endeavor to provide further protection for OWNER against defects and defi- ciencies in the work, but the furnishing of such Resident Project Representation will not make ENGINEER responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures or for safety precautions or programs or for Contractor's failure to perform the construction work in accordance with the Contract Documents. J, Assisting the OWNER in claims disputes with Contractor(s). K. Performing investigations, studies and analyses of substitutions of equipment and/or materials or deviations from the plans and specifications, L. Assisting OWNER or Contractor in the defense or prosecution of litigation in connection with or in addition to those services contemplated by this Agreement. Such services, If any, shall be furnished by ENGINEER on a fee basis negotiated by the respective parties outside of and in addition to this Agreement. M. Preparing detailed Plans and Specifications for Trench Safety Systems. SECTION Y RESPONSIBILITIES OF OWNER OWNER shall 'do the following in a timely manner so as not to delay the services of ENGINEER: A. Designate in writing a person to act as OWNER's representative with respect to the services to be rendered under this Agreement. Such person shall have contract authority to transmit instruc- tions, receive information, interpret and define OWNER's policies ` and decisions with respect to ENGINEER's services for the Project. 8, Provide all criteria and full information as to OWNER's require- ments for, the Project, including design objectives and con- straints, space, capacity and performance requirements, flexi- bility and expandability, and any budgetary limitations; and furnish copies of all design and construction standards which • OWNER will require to be included in the Drawings and Spe..ifica- tions. C. Assist ENGINEER by placing at ENGINEER's disposalall available information pertinent to the Project including previo"us reports and any other data relative to design or construction of the Project. o' D. Arrange for access to and make all provisions for ENGINEER to enter upon public and private property as required for ENGINEER to perform services under this Agreement, E. Examine all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifica- tions, proposals and other documents presented by ENGINEER, obtain advice of an attorney, insurance counselor and other consultants as OWNER deems appropriate for such examination and render in writing decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as riot to delay the services of ENGINEER. F. Furnish approvals and permits from all governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Protect and such approvals and consents from others as may be necessary for completion of the Protect. G. The OWNER shall make or arrange to have made all subsurface investigations, including but not limited to borings, test pits, soil resistivity surveys, and other subsurface explorations, OWNER shall also make or arrange to have made the, interpretations of data and reports resulting from such investigations. All costs associated with such investigations shall be paid by the 011NER, H. Provide such accounting, Independent cost estimating and insur- ance counseling services as may be required for the Project, such legal services as OWNER may require or ENGiilEE,R may reasonably request with regard to legal issues pertaining to the Project including any that may be raised, by Contractor(s), such auditing service as OWNER may `require to 'ascertain, how or for what purpose any Contractor has used the moneys paid under tho construction contract, and such inspection services as OWNER may require to ascertain that Contractor(s) are complying with any law, rule, regulation, ordinance, code or order applicable to their furnish- Ing and performing the work. I. The OWNER shall determine, prior to receipt of construction bid, If the ENGINEER is to furnish Resident Protect Representative service so the Bidders can be informed, J, If OWNER designates a person to represent OWNER at the site who is not the ENGINEER or "IMMEER's agent or employee, the duties, re- sponsibilities and limitations of authority of Stich other person and the affect thereof on the duties and re ponsibilities of Engi- neer and the Resident Protect Representative (and any assistants) will be set forth in an attachment that is to be identified, attached to and made a part of this Agreement before such services begin, E;. _Attend the pre-bid conference, bid opening, pra-construction conferences, construction progress and other fob related meetings f w~.w..+.._w~tN...r.,. 1.. .w•YW ivwWL.YVMMw . . 0 4 ~ ~i ~ as { I ,F r and substantial completion inspections and final payment inspec- t! ons . L. Give prompt written notice to ENGINEER whenever OWNER observes or otherwise becomes aware of any development that affects the scope or timing of ENGiNEER's services, or any defect or nonconformance of the work of any Contractor, M. Furnish, or direct ENGINM to provide, Additional Services as stipulated in Section IV of this Agreement or other services as required. N. Bear all costs incident to compliance with the requirements of this Section V. SECTION VI COMPENSATION A. Alp PREAPPLICATIO`L Development of the preapp)ication for airport improvements identi- fied in Section I.A as eligible for AIP funding will be at no cost to the OWNER. S. BASIC SERVICES When identifiable airport improvements are determined, the OWNER end ENGINEER will agree upon a lump suo compensation fee for the work defined in Section III which will be made a part of this Agreement by means of an amendment executed by the OWNER and ENGINEER. Any applicable new taxes imposed upon services, expenses, and charges by any governmental body after the execution of this contract will be added as necessary to the ENGINEER'S compensation. Progress payments may be requested by the ENGINEER based on the percent complete. kequests for progress payments will not be more frequent than monthly. C. ADDITIONAL SERVICES; 1. For Resident Representation and Inspection During Construe- Mon and Construction Layout e For the resident representation during construction and construction layout (Section IV,I), the ENGINEER shall be paid based on the Schedule of Charges shown In Attachment A. Payment for' resident Project representation anA construction layout shall be due and payable upon submission of statements by the ENGINEER. Statements shall not be submitted more 14 frequently than monthly. _JO. 2, for Other Additional Services For Additional Services in Section IV except resident representation, the ENGINEER shall be paid based `on the Schedule of Charges shown in Attachment A. Payments for Additional Services shall be due and payable upon submission by the ENGINEER. Statements shall not be submitted more frequently than monthly. If OWNER fails to make any payment due ENGINEER for servic(S and expenses within thirty days after receipt of ENGINEER's statement therefore, the amounts due ENGINEER will be increased at the rate of 1% per month from said thirtieth day, and in addition, ENGINEER may, after giving saven days' written notice to OWNER, suspend services under this Agreement until ENGINEER has been paid in full all amounts due for services, expenses and Charges. SECTION ViI l TIME OF COHPLMON OWNER and ENGINEER agree that the time of completion cannot be defined at the time of execution of this contract and shall be made a part of this Agreement by means of an amendment executed by the OWNER and ENGINEER. SECTION VIII OPINION OF PROOAEI.E CONSTRUCTION COST The ENGINEER will furnish an opinion of probable construction cost of the work, but does not guarantee the accuracy of such estimates. Opinions of probable construction cost, financial evaluations, feasibility studies, economic analyses of alternate solutions and utilitarian con- siderations of operations and maintenance cost prepared by ENGINEER hereunder will be made on the basis of ENG"INEER's experience and qualifications and represent ENGINEER's best judgement as an experienced and qualified design professional, it is recognized, however, that ENGINEER does not have control over the cost of labor, material, equipment or services furnished by others or over market conditions or contractors' methods of determining their prices, and that any utilitarian evaluation of any facility to be constructed or work to be performed on the basis of the Report must of necessity be speculative until completion of its detailed design. Accordingly, ENGINEER does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual costs will not vary from opinions, evaluations or studies submitted by ENGINEER to OWNER hereunder, Y de.Y:Y4.a urn::.. , s r SECTION{ IX y . REYISION TO PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The OWNER reserves the right to direct substantial revision of the Plans and Specifications after approval by the'OWNER as OWNER may deem necessary, but in such event the OWNER shall pay to the ENGINEER just and equitable compensation for services rendered in making such revisions unless such revisions are necessary due to ENGINEER's lack of diligence or care. SECTION X OBSERVATION AND REVIEW OF THE WORK The ENGINEER will endeavor to protect the OWNER against defects and de- ficiencies in the work of Contractors, by observation of the work as it progresses, by interpretation of the plans, specifications and other contract documents to and with the Contractors, by the disapproval of defective work as may be observed and the issuance of stop-orders from the OWNER with respect to defective material and workmanship where they are observed, and the ENGINEER will exercise due diligence to assist the OWNER In requiring that the work be done in accordance with plans and spec fi- cations; but the Contractor will remain independent contractor with the OWNER, and the ENGINEER does not guarantee the performance of such construction contracts. As set forth in Section III, D.5 and Section Iv,l, ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the means, methods,, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction selected by the contractor, or the safety precautions and programs incident to the work of the Contractor. Also the ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any person except his own employees and agents at the project site or otherwise performing any of the work at the project. SECTION XI OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS All documents prepared or furnished by ENGINEER (and ENGINEER's independent associates and consultants) pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of service and ENGINEER shall retain an ownership and property interest here- in. OWNER may make and retain copies for information and reference, hoa ever, such documents are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by OWNER or others. Any rouse by OWNER without written verification or adaptation by ENGINEER will be at OWNER's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to ENGINEER,, or to ENGiNEER's independent associates or consultants, and OWNER shall indemnify and hold harmless ENGINEER, and ENGINEER's independent associates and consultants from all claims, damages, losses and expenses including attorneys'•fees arising out of or resulting therefrom. Any such verification or adaptation will entitle ENGINEER to further compensation at rates to be agreed upon by A OWNER and ENGINEER. d r Y12Y Y 0 ; r SECTION XiI INDEMNITY AGREEtIENT ENGINEER shall indemnify and save harmless the OWNER and its officers, agents, and employees from the liability of the OWNER on account of any in,iuries or damages received or sustained by any person or persons or property, including court costs and reasonable attorneys fees incurred by the OWNER, proximately caused by the negligent acts or omissions of the ENGINEER or its officers, agents, or employees in the execution, operation, or performance of this Agreement, In the event of liability from suits, actions or claims arising out of or occasioned by the negligence of both the ENGINEER and the MINER, their agents or employees, in the performance of this Agreement, each party shall contribute toward the satisfaction of the liability its propor- tionate share, which share shall 'be equal to the percentage of negligence attributable to the party. SECTION XIII ARBITRATION No arbitration arising out of, or relating to, this Agreement involving one party to this Agreement may .include the other party to this Agreement without their approval. SECTION MY TERMINATION OF CONTRACT The obligation to provide services under this Agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty days' written noticr, in the event of substan- Val failure by the other, party;to perform in accordance with the terms thereof through no fault of the terminating party. In the event of any termination, ENGINEER will be paid for all services properly rendered and reimbursable expenses incurred to the date of termination and, in addition, all reimbursable expenses directly attributable to termination, SECTION X'/ SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNMENTS OWNER and ENGINEER each are hereby bound and the partners, successors, executors, administrators and legal representatives of OWNER and ENGINEER are hereby bound to the other' party to this Agreement and to,the partners, successors, executors, administrators and legal representatives {and said assigns) of such other party, in respect of all covenants, agreements and obligations of this Agreement, -13- , F °r • , n ..::.c, ...I, , •.c((i r ' 1, b.'1 \ - Neither OWNER nor ENGINEER shall assign, sublet or transfer any rights under or interest in (including, but without limitation, moneys that may become due or moneys that are due) this Agreement without the written ' consent of the other, except to the extent that any assignment, subletting or transfer is mandated by lair or the effect of this limitation may be restricted by law. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement. Nothing :ontained in this paragraph shall prevent ENGINEER from employing such independent associates and consultants as ENGINEER may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of services hereunder, Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in this Agreement to anyone other than OIINER and ENGINEER, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of OWNER and ENGINEER and not for the benefit of any other party. This Agreement (consisting of pages l to 15 inclusive) constitutes the k entire Agreement between OWNER and ENGINEER and supersedes all prior written or oral understandings, This Agreement may only be amended, supplemented, modified or cancelled by a duly executed written instrument, SECTION XYI The following Attachments are attached to and made a part of this Agreement; Attachment A Schedule of Charges This contract is executed in two counterparts; IN TESTIMON'Y` HEREOF, they have executed this, Agreement, the cgk~day of ~m,~ 1988, ATTEST; CITY OF DENTON Owner By. • ATTEST, FREESE AND NICHOLS, [NC, Engineer r 'Pay -zd As To rev: C" ATTORMEI', -14. CITY OF MON, TEXAS BY:. 1U, ,+......F:..a4. Y° • r L..ww e,~ypyµ'tx.x mn s• , ' f ~ o s ltiC -yet ~ k Y ) y~{ )YjTJ G L ,r Y i' ATTACHMENT A SCHEDULE OF CHARGES - SPECIAL SERVICES Staff Members Salary Cost Times Multiplier of 2.3 esident epresentation Salary Cost Times iultiplier of 2.0 Salary Cost is defined as the cost of payroll of eng nws, draftsmen, stenographers, surveyman, clerks, laborers; etc,, for time directly chargeable to the project, plus social security contributions, unenploympnt compensation insurance, retirement benefits, ;medical 'and.Insurance benefits, longevity payments, sicl, leave, vacation and holiday pay applicable thereto. (Salary Cost is equal to 1,41366 times; payroll, This factor is adjusted annually,) Other bisect.Expenses Actual Cost Times Multiplier of 1.15 Other direct expenses shall include printing and reproduction expense, communication expense, travel, transportation and subsistence array from Fort Worth and othor miscellaneous expenses directly related to the work, including costs of laboratory analysis, tests, and other work required to be done by independent persons or agents other than staff members. • r15_ f ri 1 yr r, vr• rt , rr '1', * rli !1 % 5a 'r i DE'NTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CITY OF DENTON M. E M O DATES April 70 1993 T01 Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager FROM: Joe Thompson, Airport Manager SVBJECTs Land Acquisition for Runway Extension I talked with Mike Nicoly, Federal Aviation Administration, regarding some questions we have about the land acquisitions for the runway extension at Denton Airport, I asked Mr, Nicely if we could acquire the 31 acres on the Cole property without any property on the north and, Mr, Nicely stated that if we did, that would mean that the $1500000 dollars that are allocated at this time would riot be used 100%, and would roll back into the F.A.A. Fund balance. Mr, `Nicely also felt that the City of Denton should try to reach a sattlement with Dr. Wolski regarding his traot of property, Mr. Nicely also stated that there was no hurry to meet a deadline on this issue since there are no funds available in 1993 for the runway extension, Mr, Nicely ;stated that only projects that are waiting on funding and have their engineering and design work complete would receive any funding from Washington, D.C. in 1993, Mr. Nicely informed me that the City of Denton could later k purchase the Porter and Wolski Tracts of lard and use it as the 10% matching funds on future improvements. The F.A.A. will not fund any engineering design work on non-funded projects, Sincerely, b Joe Thompson, Airp rt Manager TELEPHONE,, 8171383.7736 - 8171383.7702 DIFW METRO 434.2520 ROUTE1, BOX 100 OENTON, TEXAS 76205 ILL, > t, .+.+«»...._..--,.w..,.-..a. ' V .s.a rl •+wcrYlautlC.':' i a 1a rr ~ ,r ! 1 t , ,t 1 f ' ' t ' e ~~yt '~.1 ~,,a1 t,',Li ~Srr~~ ,E~. Y~+43~iGij~+•r'~'`1'1'~lf, S , • VIN OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM T01 Rick Svehla, Deputy city manager FROMI Jeanette Scott,, Legal Assistant SUBJECT., Expenditure Transfers DATEI March 23, 1993 The below listed copy expenses have been incurred by the Legal Department in the following litigation: gty1e ef-_ G Case ¢4!?10A =.t city v. Wolski & Fryman 705 $ 35.25 city v. Cale 'trust #1 785 39.25 city v. Porter, at ux 165 38.E s Total $112.75 Please perform the necessary accounting praaedurea in order to credit the Legal Department's supply account #100-010-0004-8101 and debit the Airport Fund #402-022-AC06-0001-9009, Thank you for your assistance in this matter and if you have any questions, please give me a call. t Ica J anette 8aat • js APPROVEN A Debra Drayov t , City Attorney Rick veh a, Deputy City Manager • • bi% lrptexp.m "tkdlcalM! to gu~lfry Servlu' Y~_ .~,'.r__.fy ~ N..YY I. YI~i:i} 1 r. u:P:"... ti's Y Y MI.~ M • 1 CITY o/V ENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E, MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 78201 MEMO..AANUUM e DATE: March 17, 1993 TOE David Salmon, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer ` F'ROMj Roger McDaniel, Supervisor of Engineering Teohs SUBJECTi Overtime - Airport Overlay Airport Overtime for Bill Sangster (Hourly salary $13,79)1 Oct 2 - 2 Hrs Oat 21 2 Hrs Oct 5 -1 3 Hrs Oct 22 - 3 Hrs Oct 6 - 2 Hrs Oat 23 - 4 Hrs Oct 12 - 2 Hrs Oat 24 - 12'Hrs Oct 13 - 2 Hra Oct 25 1- 6 Hra Oct 14 - 2 Hra Oct 26 - 2 Hrs Oct 15 - 2 Hrs Oct 27 - 3 Hrs oat 19 - 2 Hrs Oct 28 - 2 Hra Total Hours for Oct m 51 kJoyambor 1992 Nov 2 - 1 Hr Nov 17 - 3 Hrg Nov 3 2 Hra Nov 18 - 3 Hrs Nov 9 2 Hra Nov 23 - 3 Mrs Nov 10 - 1 Hr Nov 14 1 Hr (Sat) Nov 16 - 3 Hra * Total Hours for Nov u 19 Total overtime spent for airport overlay was 70 hours for Sill brings the total exponaes tot 13.79 x 1.8 w $24,82 x 70 Hrs $1,737.401 If you need further info, please advise. • O Roge McDaniel AEE0021F 8171588.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 Q 0 s simnnwl F9eefr PC 1900.1990 AND Marvtn C. Nlcbo~f, pL 18961909 ' Nichols NT, _ CONSUOING[NGINIM March 5, 1993 MAR - 8 1993 Rick Svehla ~'~C '1 Assistant city Manager 215 E. McKinney City of Denton Denton, TX 76201 REI Denton Municipal Airport Runway Extension Dear Rick, We en;Joyed your visit to our office the other day and especially hearing that continuing improvements are planned for the airport, I have since been able to talk with Mike Nicely of the FAA about extending the runway, and he recommends an abhreviated study be performed to determine the impact of making the extension, Freese and Nfchols would agree to 'perform preliminary engineering work on the basis of being reimbursed when the FAA funds the runway extension, in the event the runway extension is not FAA funded within one year of our notice to proceed date, we would than expect payment by the city of Denton, A preliminary investigation will be made to determine the impact of the runway extension upon the localizer and the runway safety area. We would AnticlVAte A couple of meetings with the FAA to review the findings, our fee for this effort should not exceed $2,700,00 based upon the following assumptions) Principal 8 hrs @ $100 $ 800.00 Project Manager 16 hrs @ $94 $1,504.00 Technician 8 hrs 0 $60 d $2,70404.00 If additional services are required we would bill at these rates, It is good news to hear that Denton Municipal Airport has such good support by the FAA and that plans are being made to continue the improvements, Our i involvement, of course, is very exciting to us and we look fotvard to providing assistance, 11UNIONE 017.705.7300 a 4013 tRNA110NA1 KAM, SUM 200 [Oki WUpiN, ttVAS 70109.1895 , mtiRo0immiooo [A OINJ.5.7491 ♦•T ....a~y.~~+. N .-w r..m u f 1 1 1 o . r 1 ~ ~ i • f Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, FAEFSE-AND NICHOLS$ INC. T. Anthony Ref Senior Vice Prosy nt Jerry L, Fleming, p.E, principal • Off9J741\TI\LC7~R•5YFNIAJIf w w ~ ,~.wM~~,Na. V 19,++i M1•`+• tikr r. • • YI It • , ~ 1 1 US.Deptlrtmfxd Sol lhwosl pey'on Fort VJoiOr, tak:w 701010000 of FftlnSpof lplipft 71lNOnsnS. Loumsiarin, - - F*d#Ml Aviation Now Moxico. Okmhoma, AdmWOroyon foxes _ j MAR » 3 1993 l 1 ."_4lIYSAdgt V t~tFJS~4rn..., MdraYt 1, 1993 Mr. Rick wehla Deputy City Manager City of Denton Municipal Building Denton, TH 76201 boar Mr. svehlar This is in response to your letter datod February 247 1993 regarding the land acquisition for the existing and future runway protection zones at the Denton Municipal Airport, The steps for taking possession of the property and submitting a grant application that you have outlined In your letter are the steps that we have disoussad in our previous meetings. we can support the general approach you have outlined, At this time we cannot comment specifically on our conourrance in the costs you have detailed, in your application for the land acquisition grant, you will be requirad to document and support all of the costa incurred to acquire the property, Only after we have reviewed and evaluated the coats can we determine whether the costs are eligible for federal participation and whether the costs are reasonable, We hope this has been responsive to your latter. if we can provide 0 any additional information, please do not hesitate to nontcjt our office, s~iJnd'A`rety, Nr . 19 Mike Niaa1 Project Ma agar, Airports Division TOGNTSIN 4b1i1 OVOO No .1 r• 0 N - 1 { ,ll 1 1 1 r Clryof DENTON, rEXAS MUNICIPAL 9U1LDINO DEN YON, TEXAS 7820f / TELEPHONE(8f7) 566-8907 ~i01110e of the ChyManaper i February 24, 1993 Mr, Mike Nicely Airport Planning Specialist Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration Fort Worth, Tx 76193-0611 a+ Dear Mikes As a follow up to our discussions, we believe we have a solution s, that can work for all of us, Mike Sucek hoes had some discussion with Mike Oriffin, attorney for defendants, that might enable us to get the land for the extension and clear zones by March 3rd. If we were to take possession of the land, we could apply for the grant for the runway extension and move forward on it. We have had the condemnation hearings for the Porter tract, Cole tract, and Wolski tracts, The award for the Cole tract Was $49,771 for the acquisition of land and $42,500 for the damages (total 692,271). The award for the Wolski tract wary $45,287 and $10,480 for the damages (total $63;767), and the award for the Porter tract was $13,793, All three condemnation cases have boon appealed by the defendants. If we wait for the appeals to be settled to apply for our runway grant extension, we would not be able to start any extension project for several years. Having discussed all of this with you in our last convernations, we would propose the following procedure) 1. The city will try to strike a compromise on the Cole ® property and the Woiski property, Those two awards including damages total $156,038, 'rho cost of attorney's fees, court costs, professional appraiser services, and our In-kind work are approximately $25,000 to $30,000. That makes the total cost approximately 6180,000 to $185,000. our 10% of that would be $38,000 to $18,500. ® 2. We would submit a grant application for $162 000 to $1.65,000 as the 90t VAA share of the total coat. Currently, we have on file a letter dated Jtinuary 21, 1993; from Mr, Hugh Lyon indicating a tentative allocation of $150,000 available In pproject number 3°48-0067-0793, it is our understanding that we could submit, for a slightly • I Mr. Mike Nicely February 24, 1993 Page 2 larger amount and that adjustments could very likely be t made to accommodate this small overrun) 3. The City would put up the money for the Porter tract; at the award of $13,7931 We understand that this $13,793 could be used as part of our 109 match for the runway extension which has an estimated cost of $112 to ;1,3 million. 4. We would take possession of all three plecov of ground. We would proceed immediately with an appli,cAtion for the extension thus allowing us to have a chance at additional funding that may be appropriated from Washington in the next several months. This would allow us to be underway before September let (i.e, awarding bids by the end of the fiscal year), 5. We understand that if the Porter tract is appealed there might be some additional award made in the next iseveral years given the courts scheduling and timetables, however, we also understand if that ware the case, we could apply this additional award in a straight grant application or we could use this additional cost as part of a 109 match in other future projectu, One other option would be for us to make a settlement similar to the other awardri prior to tho award of a construction contract on the extension and apply all of the c;osto of the Porter settlement to our 109 share of the runway costs. If the FAA coin agree to this procedure, we think this would be a way for us to acquire all the land and to move ahead with the extension project, We think that this approach could be submitted to the council, and we could gain their approval, it would help us in c,ur presentation to the Council if we could receive written confirmation of approval for this type of procedure from the FAA, We have tentatively scheduled discussions with the Council on March 2nd and look forward to a letter from you if possible by February 26th1 A If ' you have any further questions, please call me at your convenience, 4 t Pk ® De puty City Manager RS t bo,, AMM00233 ® v i. r US,DaNOmAm Soulhwaslfi0 ion of Tran$Mtotbn F0i1 WD0. i0xns 76193,0000 Aiknllsn5, LM,i Sinna, NowAr0WO Oftv,,n, d~sf *t m Taxis JAN?, 1 i9ir1 The tronorabie Bob Castleborry Mayor of Denton 215 McKinney Street Denton, TX 76201 Dear Mayor Castleborryr Your request .Per assistance under the Airport lmprovoment Program, as authorized by the Airport and Airway improvement Act of 1982 (cis amended), for the Denton Municipal Airport has been Approved for fiscal year 1993, The Allocation is as followsr Nderal Funds: 5150,000 ojoct No.r 1-48-0067-07-93 oescriptionr Acquire nand for North and south Runway Protection Zones This allocation may be used only for the development deabribed above, This allocation is tentative and will remain valid so long an the project formulation is prcfaeed.i.ng on an established schedule. Failure to moat the schedule will jeopardize project funding and could lead to withdrawal of the tentative allocation. We look forward to working with the City of Denton toward the suocossful completion of this projoct. 4gh Oreiyi , rayon Assistant Mnnaggor, Airports Division w 7'gdrr~+HCR N17 SUCCUb 1! cat Mr, Joe Thnmpaon Airport Manager City of Denton Route 1, Box loo Denton, TX 76205 Texas Department of. Transportation Divislon of Aviation P.0 Box 12667, 410 Past 5th Street Austin, TX 7971,1-2607 e a . j a US.D@MOMnt SOUlhweat noo on rnn Waiea texaR roros ooao ol'TronsMfotlon Arkansas, Louisiana, F*dW*l Avkftn Now Mox160. okiait AdmWitratlon texas S L P 1 d 1992 The Honorable Bob Castleberry Mayor, of Denton 215 East McKinney Street Denton, TX 76201 Dear Mayor Castl.eborrys In response to your recent request in a letter dated September 8, 19920 we have withdrawn the tentative allocation rf $113060 for pro act numbor 3.43^0067-06-92, Which included the acquisition of land adjacent to the Denton Municipal Airport We understand from your letter that the city is dillent.ly moving forward with condemnation proceedings to aequirq the property, The prooesm you have outlined for amending the original preappl:ieation when the cost for acquiring the land becomes known is accurate. We are committed to assisting the city of Denton in acquiring the land that is needed to protect the existing approaches no well as the approaches to the runway following the runway extension project. We anticipate working closely with ycu and our staff in completing the 1 a nd acquisition in a timely manner whan the costs for acquiring the land becomes known, we look forward to continuing to work in a cooporative spirit with you and your staff to improve the Denton Municipal Airport, if you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (817) 624-6613. sincerely, ® Mike 1lieely Project Manager, Airports Division cat Mr, Coe Thompson, Airport Manager Denton Municipal Airport Route it Box 100 Denton, TX 76205 TOd1STRIA M11 OU00110 , 0 ca LOA V a ' i NO. CV-92-00520-A CITY OF DENTON, Plaintiff 5 CON1`SMNA'tION PROCEEDINGS ` VS. S FILED WITH THE JUDGE OF $ THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW M.T. COLE TRUST NUMBER ONE 5 NO. 3, IN AND FOR THROUGH ITS CO-TRUSTE88, S UhNTON COUNTY, TEXAS Defendants S On this the day of 1993, in the above styled proceeding came on to be considered the Award of Commis- . , stoners filed with the Judge of the County Court at Law No. 3 of Denton County, Texasr on the 15th day of December, 1992. And, it appearing that the parties have agreed and compromised this matter, and have agreed to waive objections to such award which are on file in this matter, and acknowledge same by the signature of their counsel to this judgment. And, it appearing that the City will pay the sum of Ninety Two Thousand Two Hundred Seventy-one and No/100 Dollars (092)271.00) for the fee simple title to that certain property situated in the city of Denton, Denton County, Texas, being heretofore described in the Award of Commissioners referenced above which is incorporated herein and made a part hereof for all purposes, i IT IS THEkRFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECRF.EDt 0 t. That the Commissiazerst Award in this proceeding is adopted are the Judgment of this Courtr JudSimAnt/pogo 1 o i 2. That the City of Denton, Texas do have and recover from the M. T. Cole Trust Number on) through its co-trustees, Bob F, Cole, Jack Donald Cole and Virginia C. Houston, the fee simple title in and to that certain property (31,107 acres) situated in thn City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, being heretofore described in the incorporated Award of commissioners, and tho same be, and is hereby vested in the City of Denton, Texas 3, That Defendants, M, T. Cole Trust Number one through its co-trustees do have and recover from the city of Denton the said sum of Ninety Two Thousand Two Hundred Seventy-one and No/100 Dollars ($92,271,00), 4. That M. T. role Trust Number one through its co-trustoes will not be responsible for erecting or maintaining a fenoe between the 31,107 acres herein vested in the City and the Trust's remaining property. The city of Denton shall be responsible for erecting and maintaining a feneo to keep livestock pastured on the Trv,st pi.,operty from roaming out onto City of Denton Municipal Airport runways or taxiwayv. n. That M. T. Cole 't'rust Number one through its co-trustees may continue to use the 31.107 acres horoin vested in the City for 0 livestock and reoreati.onal purposes until such time as the City develops a need to oixupy the 31.107 acres, in the event the City wants to occupy the 31.107 acres in a manner that preoludes the uses by Trust as contemplated An paragraph 4 above, the city will be responsible for erecting and maintaining fences sufficient to audgmont/Pegs 2 i' t .u.. 1 n n `e.w .,~.v rM+Vilii f .41Y. i 1NI [ t1 e r i r x 3 P~ 5 prevent livestock from interferring with the intended uses by the City, 6. It is further ORDERED that all costs of court in this behalf incurred be and the same are hereby taxed against the party incurring same, and that the City of Denton may have its Writ of Possession if same is necessary, upon payment of the Commiasioners, Award into thu registry of the Court or to the M. T. Cole Truot Number one directly. STONED this the day of 1993. JUDGE PRESIDING COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO, 3 DENTON COUNTYs TEXAS APPROVEDt MICHAEL A. BUCEK ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS f MIKE GRIF'F'IN, ATTORNEYW- M. T. COLE TRUST NUMBER ONE THROUGH ITS CO-TRUSTEES Judgment/Prga 3 ~ Q • o NO. CV-92-60821-B CITY OF DENTON, S CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS Plaintiff S FILED WITH THE JUDGE OR VS' S THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW Fb WOL91(I AND VIRGINIA S NO, 21 IN AND FOR FRYMAN, Defendants S DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS JUi~GMENT On this the day of , 1993, in the above styled proceeding came on to be considered the Award of Commis- sioners filed with the Judge of the County Court at Law No. 3 of Denton County, Texas, on the 22nd day of January, 1993. And, it appearing that the parties have agreed and compromised this matter, and have agreed to waive objections to such award which are on file in this matter, and acknowledge same by the signature of their counsel to this judgment. And, it appearing that the City will pay the gum of Sixty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Sixty-seven and No/100 Dollars ($63)767400) for, the fee simple title to that certain property situated in the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, being heretofore described in the Award of commissioners roferonced above which is incorporated herein and made a part hereof for all purposes, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECR=1 1, That the Commissioneral Award in this proceeding is adopted as the Judgment of this Court 2. That the City of Denton, Texas do have and recover from the r Ed Wolski and Virginia Fryman, the foe simple title in and to that certain property (16.174 acres) situated in the City of Denton, s Denton County, Texas, being heretofore described in the incorpo- rated Award of commissioners, and the same be, and is hereby vested in the City of Denton, Texas! 3. That Defendants, Ed Wolaki and Virginia Fryman do have and rocover from the City of Denton the said sum of sixty Three Thousand seven Hundred Sixty-seven and No/100 Dollars ($63,767.00)1 4. That Ed Wolaki and Virginia Fryman will not be responsible for erecting or maintaining a fence between the 16,174 acres herein vested in tho City and the Wolaki/Fryman's remaining property, The City of Denton shall be responsible for erecting and maintaining a fence to keep livestock pastured on the Wolaki/Fryman property from roaming out onto City of Denton Municipal Airport runways or taxiways. 5. tt is further ORDERED that all costa of court in this behalf incurred be and the same are hereby taxed against the party incurring same, and that the City of Denton may have its writ o ` Possession if same is necessary, upon payment of the Comminsioneral Award into the rogistry of the Court or to Gd Wolaki and Virginia Fryman directly. SIGNED this the day of , 1993. • J'UDqE PRESIDING • COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 r ~ DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS Award of Spatial Commierionere/page 2 'i ~..ti..r -a. .,r....._aa. , I • «w:. ~.w~, +xWi1 j.. T w . ru._ ~ I APPROVED; MICHAEL A, BUCEK tSSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS l MIKE GRIF'F'IN, ATTORNEY FOR I ED WOLSKI AND VIRGINIA FRyMAN 1 • s Toward of apooial Comiaaionorr/Pegd 3 N \ l yid 1 V r' -1 r r S f~rll r I 'f G, 0 , r DATE: SEPTEMBER 11 1992 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO, Mayor and Members of the City Counotl i±ROMI Lloyd V. Merrell, City Manager SUIIJECTi BID 01391 - TAXIWAY AND APRON IMPROVEMENTS CHANGE ORDER NUMBER ONE RI Ct MMRND TION We recommend this Change order to the Taxiway and Apron mm provem©nt contract with APAC of Texas ]no, be approved and the contract reduced by $83,992.00, S~UBIMARY r This bid was orlginfilly award to APAC'T'exas Ino, on July 7, 1992 In the amount 1,091,80, The now amount including the $83,992,00 reduction is $As1~,099;96. , This n<duotlon Is due to (1) a change In the type of Stress Absorbing Membrane Intoriayor to be pieced under the asphalt and (2) a change in the asphalt IAydowu pr<,cedure affecting a lessor number of runway lights. BACKGROUND: Memorandum from Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager and Change Order Ford" from Freese and Nichols, PROORtA_M ,1)EPA.BTMFN't'50 0 OUpSAF'F'T TEDiAirport OperatlonaundAPAC- Te~ea FISCAL IMPAC3Ti Contract amount will be reduced in the antount of $ Respeotfully submitted l 0,4 loy ; 11'arroiF City Manager App v di tl y Names Tom Shaw C P,M. O :Thloi Purchasing Agent i~e~,.aenee ...gJ..rra-..wwJ.:_W . , wi .~nir.~ ~r rYiii l l • u fem.... , I .1. 1 I I S l 1 ORDINANCE NO. 'I a Ali ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CHANGE ORDER TO A (,'ON- TRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND __-APAC OF TEXAS INC. ►VOR A REDUCTION IN THE CONTRACT PRICE1 AND PROVIDING AN EFF8CTIVg 1 DATE. WlItR1AS, on JUI,r7 1992, the City awarded a contract t for a i ay a;s Aprott Improvements to the amount for _ _ - M 731 091.50 and WHEREAS, the City Manager having recommended to the Council that a change order be authorized to amend such contract and said change order being in compliance with the r6quirements of Article 2968a, V.A.C.S.1 NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON 118REBY ORDAINS= SECTION 1, That the change order reducing the, amount of the contract between the city and APAC TEXAS INC, 0 in the amount of Eighty Three duusarid Nine ffiffin a Y~tn y Ko o/100 B ,9 ~~00 a copy of which Is attached hareto, is hereby approved, a1L(M:L91L.. U. That this ordine,hce shall become effectivd immediately upon it passage and approval. , PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1991. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST I JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECAETARY • APPROVED, AS TO LEGAL FORMt DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY,ATTORNEY A tl V , l ..ralr ~r ® r~ 5 GI rY of DENrON, rExAS MUNICIPAL SWLDWO / 1)ENTON, TUAS 76201 /TELEPHONE (817) $66.8007 Olllce of the City Manager ~ I M)~.Mi] RA1:~XI7L31vY rr d? Toi Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM$ Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager DATES August 27, 1992 SUBJECT1 Change Order for the Runway Overlay Contract at the Airport For: the last several weeks, we have been trying to work with the contractor on changing the mode for the overlay operation at the airport to facilitate based aircraft operations with the least amount of inconvenience to transient And local air traffic, To that and, we have negotiated with the contractor on a number of different areas. We got a price from the contractor to change the operation to a night timo operation. As you can see by the attached information, that bid is $1,057,000, If the FAA agreed to additional funding, that would mean our cost would also `go up an extra $35,000 - $45,000, The other option which we have been looking at would change the time of operation to 9100 a.m. to 6100 p.m, initially, the contractor had indicated this time of operation would also result in extra charges. However, through negotiations, we were able to eliminate those, This would allow all of our based "high performance" aircraft such as jets and turbo props to leave early in the morning and to return at nigght, Under this scenario, the contractor would pull off at the end of operations each day so that the full runway would be open continuously from 6100 p,m to 9%00 a.m, the next morning. We have talked to the owners of the two jets and to the biggest turbo prop owner, and this scenario is agreeable to them and masts their needs. The detrimental effect to the airport would be for eta or other, high performance aircraft that wanted to land between 100 a.m. and 6100 p.m, This obviously could not occur, Thus it would effeot the Pao 's on the airport. However, In an effort to mitigate that, we have also talked to the contractor about the need ® to finish the paving on the runway in an expeditious manner. At q our meetings to date, he has indicated that he fools that it will take about twenty working days to complete the work on the runways, This would equate to about a month to five weeks in terms of 69 MW Lloyd V, Harrell August 27, 1992 Page 2 calendar days if the weather is cooperative and we do not run into any problems with it, In our negotiations,' we were also able to discuss methods of operation and materials used and were able to allow an alternate to be used on some of the repair procedures, This alternate is responsible for an actual reduction in our price, This reduction is responsible for us coming, to the Council with a change order. You will note that the actual cost of the contract has been reduced substantially because of that, Since the differential in cost to the city is between $350000 and $45,000, we can see no alternative but to suggest to the Council to approve this change order which would include the 9j00 a.m, to 6100 p.m. operation, We have reviewod this with the Airport Board, and they are racommending such to the Council, Since this is moving so fast, we do not have a contractor's signature at this time, We will have the signature by Tuesday evening; If you or the council ham any further questions, Y would be happy to try and answer them at your convenience, Deputy City Manager RSibw AMMOOlAS Attachments • ~yqJ 1,~ , 1 t ~ l G3 A ' r NzaFerrTxws RWTr*1 2100 To 0600 AdMinintretive Preliminary 6 46000 Con*truction 10000 APAt.-Texas 679i206.00 Additional Milling a, 400, 00 PrOci6iOn 5tripinf4 46,077,00 rnspdotion 9261000 Testing 20,000 gngineoring 270560 TOTAL $ 1,067,000 Pdb4+,AL SHARE 810,000 LOCAL $Wig 247,000++ • Assures no inarsase in federal twW6 dua to lnorease in costs, r+If Pedsral fwnds available and mendunt ovsd, u x allOnftent would be S19X,l~00 or total grant of =991,3640 1eevLrW a local ors of $128,600, MM A.. YfVCRBAsa XN 9-M-1-NIR-RrNO COBT$ 16 sal nAlmo. 09RALO MiICX 8/18/99 o O ' CHANGE ORDER PROJECTI Runway Overlay 6 Taxiway Impvatts, PROJECT NUMBER OTH92677 CONTRACTORt ApaowTexos, Inc, ENOINEER1 Freese and Nichols Inc, OWNERI City of Denton CHANGE ORgEp NO,I Dne t) DAT$I August 27 1992 Make the followingp additions, modifications or deletions to the work described in the Contraot Aocumentsr 1 Addi New item 6. 94,406 $,Y, of 5,6 oz. Oeotextite 0 $1,60 $,Y. $ 1260600,00 Deletes ItsM Nn, 8 64 400 S-Y, Stress Ablorbing Membrane lnterlayer 0 12-0 S.Y. (5 2060092.00) Item No. 8 Temporary Lighting L, S, 4 (5 61600,00} NET CHANGE IN CONTAACT AMOUNT (563+982.00) rho Compenrotion agreed upon !n this Change Order is full, complete and final payment for a11 Costs the Contractor may incur as a result of or relating to this Change wheihdr said costs are known, unknown, foresleh or unforrseen of this time, including without limitation, any cost for delay, extended overhead, ripple or impact Cost, ar any other iffeCt on changed or unchan ed work as a result o this Choh a Ordert previous Contract Amount 5 Net Change in Contract Amount 492,00 Reviaid Contract Amount 5 fi4z--090 Previous Contract Tlme _ g0 CAL~y oavr Previous Substantial completion Date _ November 1. i99 Previous Final ComplAtion Hate _ Neuember I, soon Not Change In Contract Time Revised contract time Revised Substantial Completion Date Revised Final Completion Date r N 4 • • f a'tifu nc FkG~SL f41ifii''JL5 PHU U• : i MMMM lMON da' aa+ORat 10 an ADDXDO afODM20 OR D EJ NM p10.rWrl away Overlay 4 taxiway Uprovemsnts bMNBt city of Denton paaCJ'ito'i' No. N/A OOMMOMI Apac•TexaeO tno. Di00'aM N4. ZKOXI ram I naaaa And Nichols inn. 1itri4Mta9N No. DIV 91077 AatlsAiNOVt PM No. One (1) DATXS August 270 1991 i 1 the drner Proposes to make floc tollowing additlonr0 modltioations or dslotionx to the work described in the Contraot Doaumentr. Authorisation to proaead with those ahauugqer must be approved by r1old Order or Chang order in 4ooordanoe with the Contract Doaumsnts. Delstioul Delete straes absorbing membrane interlayer from project. Delete the Temporary Lighting from the projoot. 7rddiYlaara Add minimum !fell oat geotextils fabric to replace stream absorbing membrane'intarlayor. Apply AC-20 asphalt along with geotaxtila fabric. contraotorls work hours shall be from 9100 60ut to $100 post The contractor shall be provided approximately 2,$00 linear fast of runway available for construction Contractor shall complete work on the runway within 21 working days after starting to work, Reasons for rmatrustlooff To reduce the construction time between the spot repairs and the construction of the ovarlay, a geotextile will be laid down before the bituminous overlay. The Tai"oralry 1Lightinq will not be required mince the runway will be • open to traftia each night. lira aged by riur~iaa ANa! >t:asaraf, xNQ. By Lars 4 Schuelsinp P. x. • Project xngineer • riisnamel a►CM01,PCM *w YOTAL Ppdf,@e r CHANGE ORDER s9 t, PROJECT: Runway Overlay & Taxiway Im vmts, p PROJECT NUMBER DTN42011 k CONTRACTOR: Apac•Texas; Inc, M. ENGINEER: Freese and Nichols Inc. ; OWNERi City of Denton CHANGE ORDER NO.i One (1) _ DATE., August 21, 1992 1 Make the following additions, modifications or deletions to the work described in the Contract Documents: Adds New Item 5- 84,400 S,Y, of 5,5 oz, Geotextile @ $1.50 S,Y, $ 126,600,00 Deletes Item No. 5 84,400 S,Y, Stress Absorbing Membrane Interlayer @ $ 2.43 S.Y. 205,092.00) Item No, 8 Temporary Lighting L. S. @ 51500,00) NET CHANGE IN CONTRACT AMOUNT ($53,992.00) The compensation agreed upon in this Change Order is fall, complete and W final payment for all costs the Contractor may incur as a result of or relating to this change whether said costs are known, unknown, foreseen or unforseen at this time, Including without limitation, any cost for deldy, extended overhead, ripple or impact cost, or any other effect on changed or unchanged work as _a result fthis Order, Previous Contract Amount Net Change in Contract Amount Revised Contract Amount $424 Previous Contract Time 60 CALENDAR DAYs Previous Substantial Completion Date ov r l'. I&L Previous Final Completion Date November 1 im Net Change in Contract Time Revised contract time Revised-Substantial Completion Date Revised Final Completion Data 0 ~ ~ f p jI 5 . 0 i . y J , ~ 4 `er { W 1 r li it 1, 4 Recommended by FREESE AND NICNOLS, INC, Approved by APAC- TEXAS, INC Hy / el By k4el4uaj P" 1 Date hAlr;1 I,1~~ Date Approved by i; CITY OF DENTON a ills 11 By Ddte i 2 I n i GJ i PROPOSED CONTRACT MODIFICATION C~`ht da os► TOR t~~,tA cT,rKy Frequestthat i.2uA kA-e otsszk Y Tp11 ~r~QRouew~e,~tS` PROJECT NUMBER : a te-e-r RIPTION: No,TION TO CONTRACTORi r proposes to make the additionst modifications or deletions to the cribed in the Contract Documents as shown in Attachment "A",. We that you take the following action within 10 calendar days; Q Notify us that you concur that this change does not require a change in Contract time or amount; A Field Order will be issued. Submit a Brice Proposal with detailed cost breakdown of labor, materials, equipment, all other cost related to this change and a revised schedule for performing the described changer 0 Proceed with the change, Payment will be made at the unit price bid, 0 Proceed with the change under the time and materials provisions of the Contract. Authorization to proceed with changes must be approved by Field Order or Change Order in accordance with the Contract Documents, B S Q, Dates CONTRACTOR' RESPONSEt We respond to your request a!; follows: a we concur that this is 'a no cost or time change,, Issue Field Order, J~ We submit the attached Price Proposal with detailed cost breakdown and revised schedule for performing the described change, Cl We are proceeding with the change at the unit price bid, 0 We are proceeding with the chango under the time and materials' provisions of the Contract, By:rGIN-PV ~/~(ctic c Oate;_g~Z~` rL` =~---r ACTION TAKE 0 Proposed Contract. ModifIcation rejected, Contractor is hereby notified NOT to proceed; i Byl..Dates a Field Order issued: NoL Oate s Change Order issuedi NorD I Dates9r27=U Byte; e/zo/st +r w 0 w 0 r~ rY 1 r f r f, , ra , , ALIG 27 192 69131AM APAC-TEXAS INC FORT W0R711 P,1 f ; APAC•TEXAS, INC- OTTY OF DENTOH S FORT YORTN BRANCH 9011 IVA% STREET t PLO. Box 1807 DIRTOVI, TEXAS Fort Yort6, ToxAs 76101 Protect Owl RUNWAY 04ERLAY,TAXIWAY I APRON Dite 06/eVie Project Houters 3.46,0467-0792 Project Loatlonl OENTOB MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 4uotr 16004.004 Seq, Hbr 06"flPEl64 Ouantity U/M Unit Pmcunt Item code 0101 BITUMINOUS BURPAC£ COURSE 11140,000 ION 261000 311920100 0102 TACK COAT 160001000 DAL 1350 9900,00 0103 RUNWAY SPOT REPAIRS 86001400 BY 71000 39200104 0104 PAVEMENT MILLNO e03.000 6Y 11500 3979,60 0105 FABRIC U90WUL 84400400 BY 1,500 186600400 0106 SNOULDEA ORADINO 11000 LS 6200,000 6200,04 0107 TfMPORARY WINO L040 L8 83401044 25dd140 0109 HfRBICID£ 251440 9AL 801000 500106 0810 POLYMER MOD A6PH, 1REATMENT 60000,000 BY 2,350 141000100 0211 TACK COPT POLYMER MOD, 6£AL 6000,004 DAL 1550 3300,00 • Totdt Peaont 64701%60 }~o11RS 9;bgAN►w~oloQ ~1,, ~ ~dAit,~Pl4i~ ~4w~•~Gt+•N * 2So 6 L. F, 6 F 19QlA Y f vv 6 6f w 4wl'Y'~ R~~a4S+0►'h' alowfiao 2 - I to • 9} p6► `fit" 14 1C46L 1 r I r r ! r 1 i~ 1 ~ + .•.3 ! i i r rf, ld Jl 1 ~Y ~r-l ,ref) r ' _ - ..7 r I. 1 r 1 ,1 •I 1L 11 ~ - ll •'!rr r r t ,'t E l I • / f1 I ,I, r - ~ r 1 I, I 1 I 1 r I .i .i. ay + V^orl {{:f f I.+:% pal f.:'1I{'•} V. .~i'.t ft 110 DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT ~ CITY OF DENTON M P M 0 R A N D U M Tot Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager F'RO141 Joe Thompson, Airport Manager DAT8't August 20, 1992 l i SUnJECTt Turbine Jets Using Denton Airport This is a break dawn of Denton based jets and t:).ansit jots using Donton Airport, Aiso, the amount of Jot-A Fuel Purchased by and t AirDenton June months thonthes m of. months of Juno July, August and September., 19911 and ne and July, 1992, x . JE'P ASRCRi11 T OPERATIONS MAY .1992 Denton Based Transit 25% Lon- or ;T23 9 JUNV 1992 Denton Dasod Transit 25$ Non-Fuelor * 1 5 12 7 JULY 1992 Denton Based Tvans,it 25% Non~FUaler 14 TELEP11ONE: 897138,3'7738 8171383.7702 Ulf W MEIPO 4U2529 14OUTE 1, BOX 100 ~ OENTON, TF,XAS 76?.05 r, .'l 1 I l l r f t r 1 ~ n` I 1 I ~ I~ i11 ~ 1 f t ~ 1 4~ ~ 1 I a ~ ~ 1 I I . I f i all l ji a•' ~f' f 1~tt 11 C~ l;i 1 - ~If 1~~1 ~,f r I IaI ~ I I } ` ~a !,I { 11 1 t I~~ is i r 11) r. I 41°~' 4 Yt, e ilU' 1 111, II .I I bra I '`1 11 i Ir 'I li t ~`i 1 { t l '31 ;`'I 4 fri llr 'r Paa 4aS 1 11 f~ ~ 1 _ I _ Ill ~ tt 'i 1 ) ~ t ~ 11 Ir ~ I 1 111 r 1 )1 } a1 1 I~_ f p 1 I f I* 11 .I .l I Ill 1 l '11 1.1 i i 1 Il t 111. {I I ;I .nl ,.c .I. [ 1..1f° ~ '.a•'.dvh 4 t r ,r 1 I _ Svehl.a. Paga 2 AUGUST 1992 (Through 13th) Denton913ASed Transit 1.5~ Non-F'ueler Ei 3 ! IT, JET«A PUE1, PO RCHASEt1. $5,488,58 Juno 1991 7417 qal @ .7400 gal $4,086.65 July 1991 ..~1_ $4,134,78 Aug. 1991 5859 gal @ 6975 gal B 1991 5928 gal @ 16975 gal $5004,00 Juno 1992 6400 gal @ .6725 gal $5,336,00 July 1992 7360 gut @ ,725 gal $2026.46 July 1992 3915 gal @ .7475 gel Should you roquire additional information, Please do not hesitate to give me a call,` Sincerely, Joe Thompson, A t Manager [ i. i 1 Nks»w.ri. Mme.. N k µ.)Y.vrf""_ ~tYL9h'.'~ . r IM°` r 1 ~y~ t 1 .l: 4 i :1 1 ~S 1t,t f 1 ll'. ,111 r 1 l'. 11 . fl c .1 ,'1t ' 1 !1 7 1 11 ' 7 Y!I 1 t ,,4 1 1 u If 11, 1 ! I i~ ~ ' r Y .1Y. 4 , SFI ~ ~1 1 1 1 ` 11 , ' r 7 r f I t r u 1 ' 1 1 , t i i 1 1 . AirDsnton, Inc. 'JULY 15, 1992 CITY OF DENTON EuF.. P_uBcHasrs_;_ 2073 2099 5 , 33b .00 ' Jp,F 5,,136 00 2900-166Cl AVBA5 4,093,76 TO TAL;~12,35G,2?VX 3%Vti 3%0.68 HANGAR RENTS COLLECTED 4i 7,160.00 TIE DOWN$ COLLE'CT'ED 60.00 TOTALS $ 7,220.00 k 10% $ 722,00 BUDGET RENT A CAR NONE t,OVGD FROM AIRPORT i 100 TOTAL PAYABLE TO CITY OF DEMON 1,0'32,6 ri Avlation sorviaes Fit 1, Municipal Airport Wnton, Tom, USA 78208 817.898.1200 Fax 817-383.811'/ r . . fit. I I : r i 'AlrDenton, Inc. -',TUNE 15, 1992 CITY OF DENTON 2783^~2f $ '4,304.00 2791--IbOL1 WnU 4,838.30 2834 - ILbLL ONO 3084.20 TOTAL: x«12,626.80 378.80 HANGAR RENTS COLLECTED $ 7,330.00 TIC DOWNS COLLECTED 60.00 TOTALS: $ 7,390.00 X 10% 739.00 BUDGET RENT A CAR NONE MOVED rAOM AIRPORT .00 TOTAL PAYABLE TO CITY OF DE'NTON ~ 1,1?6,80 M Avlatloh 8ervloea At. 1, Municipal Airport ~ Denton, Toxi;: USA 76206 $17.898.1200 Fax 817.383-8117 .......-~o,,,~•ew..Mev.,:ra!~CFT~1'frrt~rs~lRr.! .✓-.h-T..f.MtiIM wMM r r. YM. ~..wu fd.~i]~•_i"M WYi ~l 1 N 0 - r it t r r A Ir ,I r 1 1~ ~ 'r Alr enton, Inc. SEPTEMGER 1501991 CITY OF DENTON 056077- !boll PVVfi6' 6040.33 066284 - J#f J} 057069 - 4,134.78 lDOet TOTAL I k".9z'-Z2 d 161297.40 rX 3% 488.93 HANGAR RENTS COLLECTED 6,670.00 vZ YYE DOWNS COLLECTED 70TAL5t 6Qr0¢ 6,900,00 'X 1Ok • 690.00 SUUGRT RENT A CAR 7.20 X SOk • .72 TOTAL PAYABLE TO CITY OF DE'NTON • 1,179.66 • A ~ A A Aviation Services >~1 1, MUntclpal Airport Denton, Texas, USA 76200 817.898.1200 Fen 817.383.8117 A m t t A 1 1 ~1 i I 1 ! s ! ! : ` 1 irf 1 l 1~- l tr 1l 1 1 T :Vr I , r i . 1. I v n i d. 1 1 11. u~ ,t 1 1 ,r ! 1 i I, AalrDenton, Inc, j I AUGUST 15,1991 CITY OF DENTON ! 054660- 4 4 4,096,66 085;.t V- JOOLL 4449 TOTAL 4 10i0g4 X 3% ' 302.63 HANGAR RkiNTS COLLECTED R 6,406.00 TIE DOWNS COLLECTED 70.JkQ TOTAL: 6,496.00 X 10% 4 649.60 BUDGET RENT A CAR « '266.40 X 10% 26.64 TOTAL PAYABLE TO CITY OF 05NTON ~ 978.67 s Avlotlon Servloee At, i, Munlalpal Alrpon Den1M one as, USA 78206 817.8981200 • Fax 817.383.811 t r Alydenton, Inc. a 7ULY 16,1991 CITY OF DENTON E'.SJ€L Mrlo 063701-r0OLL AVP46' $ 6,070,07 054602-IDOLL RVC1?g 6.26L TOTAL $ 13,137.42, X 3% $-364.13 HANGAR RENTS COLLECTED * 6,920.00 TIE DOWN$ COLLECTED 90.00 TOTALS= $ 6,110.00 X 10% 611,00 BUDGET RENT A GAR 42.46 X 10% # 4.26 TOTAL PAYABLE TO CITY OF DE'NTON _ 979,38 . e Avlation Sorvlca! Rt, Mu W;al AirpoM Denton, Texas, USA 79205 • 817.858.1200 Fax 817.383.8117 -+....-J......r_.a.....~., 1 ' w.. d•w.w rnSS4a:u^r a r . r rr , y~ii 1 r1 r ,i i ter' Alraentony Inc. JUNE 15,1991 CITY OF DENTOM j tra, EVRQR 3ES: 062221-J6 062843, VC45 l6QLL SMS,88 063471 5256.93 TOTAL 10x328.0 X a% n ® 349.84 HANGAR RENTS COLLECTED pt 60055,(", TIE DOWNS COLLECTED 60,c0y TOTALS: 6,116.00"X 10% . ~ 611.50 BUDGET RENT A CAR i 9.90 X 10% • .99 TOTAL PAYAELE TO CITY OF DENTON ~ 922.33 Aviallon Services Rt, t, klunlGlpal Airport D9nlon, Texas, USA 76205 8176898.1200 Fax 817.38,3.8117 .w.w........ e..iw.-:«w. , , y wl.:....a.i..rvLL•~ ` . L w . " , Pnl i I AUG 1S '92 3927 FREESE-NICFidI g pRGE • vl; ~ SlmtlnW.f H. Slllpf~p ~l. ANO MatMnC. NkAt. 1tAFl%A. `.k$ hokINCA f. t CbNfUU1Nb tkr,IMt44 ~ I FAX TRANSMITTAL SHEET I ro, ,~~a~" ~oMr~?~ DArE, B,~jar~gz FAOMi r~rljaldGG MLrA~. TOTAL WMMEA OF PAQES INCLUCIN4 TRANSMITTAL SNEETI CHANCE. derv s~z /o arr~ c~ If thew i3 6 P1,416m raeafvfng any of the Pagel 1►1ease Call our office 8171336.7161, and ask for Pamela Carr at extension 367. COWNT81 Air x ~Q.Rr4Ar r 7'"~c~.,v 6 ad "9 A.V F 11110W"A"1Y.W1 4 MII k1 HNt+wrf rM .~iwa wwu _ rRr 0 1 1 1 , 1't it I 1 I: I I - - - - - - - - - - - - AUG 19 '92 9127 FREE=YItCHOL9 1-PA13E . 02 WNTON 14MrCIPAL AIRPORT SW WRY OF PROJWT oXTg Administrative Preliminary $ 4,000 Construction 1000 APAC-Tsxas 731,pq`SO Additional MitiIng 4,060.00 Precision Striping 42,997,28 inspection 7841000 Testing 21,000 snginaering 25,000 'TOTAL 9w 0040-- PaDhHAL SMRg 8100000 LOCAL SHARE 900000 DAYTIM CM$raUCTrCN 0900 TO 1800 Administrative Preliminary $ 40000 Construction 10000 APAC•Texas 707,023,78 Additional Milling' 4,728,00 Precision Striping 42,997,26 Inspection 7680000 Tasting 21,000 Hnainearing 26,000 --_72,50o_ TOTAL • $873,500 PRDUAAL SHARK 7860180 LOCAL, SIM13 87080 > > ~ r r ti ' r •i r`. i AUG 19 '92 5128 FREf:,J. PAGE. 03 F4Io}t "IMH COMTRUCTIQry 2100 To 04600 Adminatraytive Preliminary Construction $ 4,004 1~0o0 APAC-Texas 873,206400 Additional Milling 5,400,00 Precision Striginfl 46,677,54 Inspection 9261,000 Testing Rngineer3nB 26,000 I 270500 TOTAL $ 11057,00b FEDERAL 9KME 810,000+ FOCAL $Wa 247,000iss Assumes no increase fn federal funds due to increase in *Olt Federal # aostt, would be uv~ds availdbia,and a4iandunt approved, mex VMndnent $121 Of 12 F300 or total Brant of $93.1,500 leaving a local share ~RfS FVO IYY~~~.MA~nb WELD wl-IT-1111111 UIL ~l r INaWgQ LAD r INCRUSB IN GNOINRBRINO COSTS IS ASTIMATan, A ORRALD MUSICK 8/19/92. " ~y i (Ail tl AW 14 192 0212" AW-TEXAS INC FORt WOM p,q , I , 1 AMAO-Toxost Ina, , Mort Worth ssrnheh , 1101 0014 /pale/1 nNd p& sssN (407 Melt Worth, T60" 76101 1 (817) 031.01141 MAR (11!117'1,4101 seft" add Mibhb'tm~ Inc. Ce1441tieg ibplaecre 111 Loma St 4 'let North; 'C'oma mom Attaatioe: Mr. Oseald Numiatt 001 Dater Nusieipol Airport Door sirs Attaohod are the r"ieed Priced ter workiop op the away hotoeea the bower of 0100 A,M. to 6100 PoNo am 6100 P.M. to 0100 A.M. It is m►derstood that sddltieetal days will be Mggired to do this Marie boceul• Of the limited work htiura and 440r"otd produation of night tied Mork. APAC-Teml s, INA, to proposing to do the work in tho yollowiag gegwaoere 1. Clads 1/1 of the runway flown Ind overlay the Moat i/1 of the runway in its dotir*ty. 1o awitob tretfle to the nenlr pwved vast. 112 Ot the runr♦y am overjoy the Nast 1/2 in its sotirbty. S. 0e the tavivay work during normal working hours, Mith this Pft#C sd tsegusece there, would be epprollibatoly 711 of runway for airplsee traffic to urge, his would tuqulro temporary pevamt "ft* do" Us center of the proposad lardia# aft" (to he done by others)) the noway wood ko closed dlurirg oonstruotion holaksr 010-Tom"s too, believed that it has oowrrod the c"t of the runway cleourca, but moods to know what will be requited to close tbo rumwsy "d room thaw "Ask day, betisto a fire Pries oast be figmw"o YM s0' wide paving optloa would, ism the opinion of APAC•lseasr Ima., Mau14 be of much inferior queli.ry due to the nusber of traaeveriso ,loiAts that wo do not consider thin to be A Viable Alternativs. Mo opprooiato the opportunity to work with you on this pro$sot and if say further information is hooded please teal frets to aontiot was 8lse.rr r lobby dsy i~stimator .--......r.«...+w..~,.~... w w.,r ....w ✓AUlku an..., 1 a 0 , i ~ j 11 r i , P • i. AUG 14 '92 031WW APAC•-TLXA'3 INC FORT WOR11I P,9 AAA T$XA9f INC, CITY D DD rQN FOR'f WORTH DRANCH 901 p TEXAS STREET P,13, 9.1x 1607 De`,NTUN, rEXAQ Far>; Ubfth, ToRos 7001 praJact NaM21 RUNWAY'DVVRLAYITAXIVAY M APRON Data 06/14/59 PrOJOCt %1104ri $~48~40Yiy•QY^5E? hro,$Oot Locntioni DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Qupt• M600P.•000 $rq, Nbr 004aription ouwnbity U/N Unit rimapt Itom Codo yy 0101 8I1UM,iNUUU $UkFACE COURSE 11140.000 YON 0,400 501300,00 0102 YACY, COAT t8000.000 OAL '150 9500,00 vrl ?`,rev, 010; RUNWAY SPOT REPA1,118. d500.000 BY 11f00{r 61600 00 ol04 PAVEMENT MILLINQ 803,000 BY AcO '1104•.00 0100 5, G dr •PORIV 000CCAL 84400,000 6Y 600 w6600100 0106 SHDIXD4R QRADIN9 1f000 t,B vBg00,000 $900,00 i 0107 YVIPUkANY MARKING 1,000 L$ 10000,000 10000400 0108 111HPDRARY 1,11HTIH9 1,000 {9 i 5500,000 010048 010 HCFAICIDE 6G. 400 on "$0,000 800,00 060 POLYNR [jODIFIr.b MIC1!Q-9Uk1-'ACK .100000#000 BY 21300 10000400 Uii TACK COAT' F.MUl,Btl' AOPH BU10Y 6000,060 QAL 550 3300,00 TubAl Amnunh 874906 00 ~o3~Odh,Cd ' 4. i}t III ' r r' rl ! r t 4 I r r I, i ! I i i lik i APAC-TEXAN, INC, C11Y OF OVNION FORt WORTH DRANCH P.O. On 1607 gat o TWO sTrrt;er Fort 06NYON MXAb TaKe. Worth, Y 76101 PraJect Mamui RUNWAY OVFPI,AY~YAXIWAY A ApROt1 P0000t NuMhrri 3-46-00sj-o7,•gg 400 08/14/ge PraJect LGagtianr DENTON MUNICIPAI. AIRpOfil' Vote Moi-00 464, Nb'r vow lotion O ItnH Coda uentt6y U/M Ut11t ANaur~~r 0101 Et1TUM(MOiIO RUANACC COUROf.' ~i•'" yv,'' 11540,000 TON db',000. 385900.00 j 0102 TACK CoAr 10090~oao GAI fl - n~a quo, on 0103 RUNWAY 00Y REPAlke d606,000 ar `l.~ A.000 4000,o4 0104 PRVa+rr-Nr MTLI IRO 1, v 37 r).S gft;.400 AY 1, 734 464!' 75 0105 i,"; tit FADRIC UNDEpplAL i4400,000' BY 1. 000 ' 106600, 44 0106 41101JLDEA OAADXNO 1.000 Ll A'goo, 000 M0.00 0107 7'CHMARY r;AAKINQ 1,000 LH 10000,000 10a00,00 010A TstrPORARY l.Xt1HYIN0 1,000 U `-"'8300,000 5500.00 0109 HEkHIL'IOE PS-000 OAL P0.000 300.00 I 0210, POI-MIA moolrico NICRO-IlUR-11AC0; 60000,000 ay Ii.JOO 141000,00 ()Pl1 TACK GOO CNULAX1r AfPH 8LMAY 6000, 000 OAL . ti60 3900, 00 TcfRa1 Amaimt 74434E. 7 f Alb:. $A I.AM . a. ^.n F,. ...w.~. 'Y: M .M ~71ar w3i ILG . 11 .Y • 4* 1! :r f ,~1 _t. t 1«- fit I .fjt .1 i 1 n DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CITY OF DENTON M E M O R A N D U M TO: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager FROM,, Joe Thompson, Airport Manager DATE4 August 17, 1992 SUAJECT. Acquire Land North and South of Airport for Runway ERtension. Federal Aviation Administration representative Mr, Tom Wade informed rte that the 55,7 acres of land needed for the Runway extension has a Federal Fund Tentative Allocation of $113p760 in a letter dated January 01 1992, to Mayor Bol) Castleberry, There can be a 15% allocated increase if funds are available. Also, attorney fees can be paid out of this fund for reasonable and proper cost to acquire the land, APPRAISAL AND REVIEW APPRAX06 Appraisal Land February 17, 1992 by Roger 8trahan A. 9.679 ac valued @ = $13,793,00 13, 16.174 ac valued @ u $23,040.00 ♦ C. 31.107 ac valued @ _ $49,771.00 TOTAL VALUI3 = $86,612.00 cost of Appraisal P.O. 023937 5 $ 3,000.00 a 1 TELEPHONE; 8171383.74M 8171383.7702 DIPW WNW 434.2529 ROUTE 1, BOX 100 . DENTON, TEXAS 76205 1 .f i fir, ! h I ~ i t SI;}/S it . 1 S i , f I • i I. 1 1 3 I r • d.. a ..a q 1. lfr v,:a rl1~d a1li Ar. sV Bela Pagel, August 17, 1992 REVIEW APPRAISAL OF LAND J by Tom t.,ane, SRA/SRWA I Chad Campbell, Cert. Appraiser { A. 9.679 ac value @ s $130793.00 B, 16.174 ac value @ - $23,048,00 C. 31.107 ac value @ d $A9L771,00 @ = $860612.00 Cost of Review Appraisal c $ 2,550.00 BREAKDOWN OF COSTS Land Total Cost _ $86,612.40 Appraisal of Land $ 3100000 Review of Appraisal of Land X2,550,00 Total Cost - $92,162,00 FAA `tentative Allocation $113,760.00 Total Cost $ 92,162,00 Remaining Balance $ 21,598.00 S i. .ro.:o-Lir4.-rew.4tiM+ •.Y u y4 W.Y+aa. .~.Yfi:'3a.:-i••Y 11 , lr 0 r 114"1 t r. ~1 ~•r r fit' u % t1 ` ` r GJ O e.:•.a d 5 n all Svehla Page 3 August 17, 1992 i I i Mr, Wade stated that he would give you a call and discuss the Land purchase, He suggested that the City withdraw its request I for the $113,760.00 because the settlement of eminent domain may exceed the $113760,00. Fie also suggested that after the lawsuit was _settled;.` to come back to the FAA for the correct amount of Grant money Should you require additional information, -please contact me. Sincerely, Joe Thompson, A r .114 n t} ~ r r a c~ D AkDenton, Inc. A Of P, aIcTr 4.~... JUJ AUGUST 12, 1992 U: LOYD HARRFLL CITY MANAGER IRE: RESURFACING Of' RUNWAY AS YOU ARE ALL BY NOW PROBABLY AWARE', A f4AJOR PROBI_FM HAS DEVL'LOPf D IN THE RESURFACING OF THE RUNWAY. IT APPEAtZ THAT THE CONTRACT THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED WOUI.o T07ALLY DISRUPT Tm: U&E. of THE DENTON AIRPORT 13Y TURBINE AIRCRAFT FOR A PERIOD APPROACHING TWO (2) MONTHS. THE CLOSING OF ONE HALF OF THE RUNWAY AT A TIME, AND LEAVING THE OTHER HALF OPEN IS °TO1'ALI-LY USFLF.SS TO TURBINE AIRCRAFT AND TO MANY HIGH PERFORMANCE PISTON AIRCRAFT. TH[. LUSS OF ALL IURBINL BUSINESS FOR SUCH AN H-X'fFNIXD PCRIOD WOULD BE. DEVASTATTNG TO ~)IROEsNTON AND TO THE I_EVHL Of SERVICE PROVIDED JET AIRCRAFT AT DENTON MUNICIPAL. IF SUCH A 1)1SRUP1"1014 WOIII.D OCCUR AIRllf_N1'ON WOULD E3E FORCED TO ORA~ITICAI_LY REDUCE STAFF TO THE: LEVEL OF 1908, A"PROXIMATE'LY NINETEEN ( 19) JOBS COULD BE fI RMINATED. INAMUCH 05 iT HAS :TAKEN ALMOST FOUR (4) YEARS TO GI1' SERVICE TO 11115 LEVEL, IT W001-D 8E COUNTf:'PPk0 DUCTIVE FOR THE AIRPORT AND THE CITY '10 LET THIS OCCUR. MAJOR DISRUPTION TO SERVIC-! IS UNNIICES9ARY. "IT IS COMMON f°RATICE '(LSPCCIALLY AT S',!NGLE: RUNWAY AIRPORTS) FOR THIS TYPE OR WOY TO HE DONE AT NIGHT, OR DURING SHORT PERIODS 01: EXPANDED CONSIRUCTION ACTIVITY. TO ALLOW LIGHT WEEKS FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS WoRI< AMOUNT:, I'O GRO,5S NEVI IE.NCE , AND IS IN TOTAL DISREGORD OF THE T:IGFIT`.3. PROPERTY, AND INTEREST OF OTHERS. TO ALLOW THIS To CUIt TS UNCON5i.IUNAE31_L. 7 N ERLI. ; /7 1 X -4 0 w A ~.7AMES W: I1UFF', JR Aviation Services Rt. 1, Municipal Alrpott Denton, Taxes, USA 76.05 817.898-1200 Fax 817.3838117 ~P A • ...~......,...r,...w•..=awvMryr+ww.ua. €,us,44, ,.r4.. - 4L . SEA H B A MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC, 401 NORTH 9LM DENTON, T!'' AS 76201 • TEL, (817) 387.4388 6 rAX (817) 381.5686 II~ i August 12, 1992 RE., Repaving Denton Airport Runway, Tn Whom It May Concern; Our Company, HEA Management Croup, Lna houses two aircraft, Merlin UB N4262X and Hawker • N3000B at Doom Municipal Airport. We are also a large Denton amployez (186 ampbyea) which relocated to Denton mainly because of the easy access to our aircraft at the Denton airport. 7U pavhog of the runway and the subsequent clowe of this rumvay for an indefialte long period of cline greatly inconveniences our Company,., as these idreraR are used for our Company's business on a daily basis. We are unable to understated why the repaving can't` be accomplished in a short period of time, or in such a way that: air raft operations are not to extremely inconvenienced. We will have to temport4rj} mlocate our aircraft at gyw expense, which could cause us to permanently leavo them. at this temporary site: Alt in all this repaving contract was done without any consideration to akerift'operators'who depend on the use of their aircraft in their dally businase , and originally relocated in Denton just to have convenient so" to the ]Denton Al"m Therefore, we hope you reconsider this action and find some way to keep the runway open during the repair, c r Peter C, Dcern Robert P. D)amore • President Vice President/Secretary r~r • e1 • Mark S, V enVice Presidt/Teasurer • L• w .wr..rri ritalr' 1' . w (a^• r I A r o i OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM To: Lloyd V, Harrell, City manager ,Tom°shAAO,%Purchasing Agent FROM: Jerry E, Drake, Tr,, Assistant City Attorney SUBJECT: Review of APAC Runway overlay contract DATE: August 5, 1992 Attached are the four copies of the APAC contract which I signed today, I originally held up the contract because it was executed by an individual identified as a "branch manager" of APAC, I wasn't certain that this individual had authority to bind the corporation. Section 7.3 of the bid instructions states that bid doouments must be signed by the president or a vice-president (or another corporate officer accompanied by evidence of authority to sign) and attested by the secretary or assistant secretary. The bid documents contained no such evidence of authority, nor were they attested by a secretary or assistant secretary, I brought this to Denisels attention and she requested some proof of the branch manager's authority, APAC faxed back a power of attorney which named the branch manager among those with'authority - to bind the company, A copy of that fax is enclosed with this package. The power of attorney was executed on January 4 1992 and expires on December 91, 1992, Although this would seen to close the matter, paragraph IV of the power of attorney states that this branch manager may have this authority revoked at any time, From a skeptical perspective, this authority might have been revoked some time between January 4th and the date the contract was signed. If it were, the contract would not binding upon APAC, and we have no proof that it was not revoked, Typically, a power of attorney will have a paragraph t ® whereby ,a secretary will swear and certify that the power of i attorney was in full force and effect aaa of the date of signing. For example, the power of attorney which gives authority to the bond sureties in this contract has such a certificate in the last ; paragraph of the page. With such a paragraph, we could be assured of the branch manager's authority as of the date of the contract, ® I explained the legal. ramifications of this to Denise this afternoon, she and 'tom agreed that the existing power of attorney was probably sufficient, given the improbability of the idea that a - - S1i 1 . 1.. ~ 1 j I 'I ~ I 1, . 1 . a ~l~ < i '11 51 1 I t1 11 I 4V 4) • 9 Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manaller Tom Shawl Purchasing Agent August' 5, 1992 Page 2' I slid notedisagree othat suchd a bstate of ofairs wasaimp obable, but X felt that it was my obligation to bring the matter to their attention and to yours and to explain the legal ocnaequences, 7e1. 'r'Y Drake, Jr: Enclos'arep APPROVED; r~ 1 ci ra A. Ura ov tch lJ~ • Ipackrev.mem r w wy..~.aw..IrYiYa"Y l4 t i ' . to 'r y y 0 r OA-26-1'332 1~~;27 73459F.'9 5245969 A RPCRiS Gi~~ i 1610P1 t' , U:, 1 r e z US.DdAottrnertl SAultwAelAepbn Fort WOrlh Texas 761990000 0 No* spefis, O OkenA'ne it} AvkMw ArlnMlMaf Axee j ~ Ae.B ! B 19at Mr-aO4 Thompson, Airport Manager Denton Muniuipol Airport Aoute 11 Box 100 Denton, T% 76205 Dear Mr. Thompeonr This Is to confirm our telephone conversation on April 28, 1992, regarding the process for securing Federal funding through the Airport Improvement Program (ATP) for airport development projects. Y; It is our intention to work with airport sponsors to identify high priority projects. Ono* those projacta have been identified, they are evaluated and programmed on a regional basis. A major factor that we take into consideration when programming a projaot is the ability of the sponsor to ut the projact under grant bared on bids, This requires t)Sr sponsor to procure the services of a consultant and to prepare the plans and specifications for the project. We are committed to managing the ATP program in the most efficient and effective manner possible, Our goal is to fund critically needed, high priority projects as early in the fiscal year as possibly and to secure funding for all such projocto that can be put under grant, based on aotual construction bids. ® our office has worked very closely with you in idont$.fyinq needed improvements at the airport, The design for the runway/taxiway overlay project app ears to be programming well and we antioipato issuing a grant,, based on bids, in June. We also consider the runway extension to the south an important project. The environmental assessment was A completed and a Finding of No Significant Tmpmat was issued • in November 1990, whin the city has dsvolopod lens and 2 ooification■ for the runway extension, our of~ice will work ossly with you to coordinate the solicitation of bids with the availability of funding. TodIOTMLA V2 9GCd1MD t o 0 Ir { 1 1 t r 1 Y r i r ~ Y \ 1 1 1 ( YYrr it I 04-26-1992 16j27 ;v wok r .,Y a .c+ 1345969 6245969 AIRPOSI'S 01VISfON Nothin in this letter should be construed As A Commitment of PNdsral funding for future projects. we will work diligently with the cif of Denton to provide fmnoinq for Asedad, high priority projects when the City is in a position to Accept granter based on Actual construction bids. If you have any que*tiona or require additional information, - please contact MR* nicely of our office at (819) 624-5613. sincerely, John x Dempsey manager, Airports Division °i • • ~ 61 ~ .1 i~ Y ( 1 F ! i 11 1 o b< . ' z!{ Hv ~tw h ti1i'4~( *~V a"~~ 4~)hvFs ~Y`~k 9 rY : .r l 1 1 1 AND M+MnjN4 W irel~ r.E: 13061990 + G N 1, P.E. Y9619E9 Nichols 1NC. CONSULUNC ENCINEERS April 28; 1092 Mr, Joe Thompson Airport Manager Denton` Municipal Airport Rt. 1, Box l00 Denton, Texas 76205 Dear Mr. Thompsont Attached is a revised fee development worksheet for the proposed runway extension at Denton Municipal Airport, We have made revisions based upon our understanding of the meeting wo had with you and Rick Sevehla last week. Deleted from the scope of work is surveying which will be accomplished by the City of Denton and elimination of 30 sets of drawings for the construction advertisement,' It is our understanding that the City of Denton reviewed our requirements for survey and believes the survey team can provide the same data. If you have any questions do not hesitate to call, Please let us know if this is acceptable so the contract can be modified accordingly, Sincerely, FREESE AND NICNOLS, INC, 1 Jerry L, Flemin p,le~'y JLF:tf A Attachment i 1 TREPHONE0V33W131 h11M4A~51'REET rO"%*"H,TEMMX$*%O a wMir f."" 9 kxkvv%w 1 v ~.ur.+.r~t..www Y~ ~ a.wYJ[:iI4 '1' n 13'IS•• - ' `M d " , 1 ~~F tt1%S ~ rhn Ir f~4 1/~ ti.i,,r y,t`: rcl 10 0 n _ n DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT R/N VW 1$00' EXTENSION AREA IV ORAINAOE IMPR6V6HENT3 , O TA6N/HANHOIAR K"URY APRIL 28,1092 DESr4N PHASE-- PM PE EE. PRELIMINARY PAC 0EN ENO ENOR. V V ENO TECH WORD PROC. TOTAL I, CONFERENCE 0 OtNION 6 6 6 1E 2, PM/QC 2 2 4 n 9LM1-TOTAL 6 6 6 0 2 22 1600 1466 $4" 10 164 11, 626 0 PREL ENOR, REPORT 1, F1ELO SURVEYS S~k`ff~i -E6tY E91 7 1 16 26 B, 26 6 _41- 0 0 A. Review a DENTON 4 4 _ 6. PM/OC 4 . 12 . 6 4 12 SUSY6TAL 2 16 00 30 - 6 106 ' 1276 111600 13,900 11,410 6194 f7 666 0 PREL, DEa1w+ i 1. PREL ORAWINOS l2 1'6 le 162 i 1. PREL. SPECIFICAT10Nt 2 a ae° 0 3. COAT ESIINATE 2 14 4 1 21 6. PM/OCNt OENYOM 4 4 4 ! 1$ 2 6 6 4 16 0 "-TOTAL 2 26. 166. 1276 12,600 112,946 63,076 (6~.11 44 6t 6330 126,262 0 FINAL DE616N 1, P1NAL DRAWIN0 62 0 2. W01FICATIONS . 4 22 la 94. 24 1% 5, REVIEW 6 DENTON 84 4. REV1610M4 4 A a 6 2 O 6. "IWINO PLAN 6 2 12 2 '122 0 '6. PM/OC 3 - SA 6U6-r0fAl 4 2 16 1264 4 . 32 166 26. 3W 0 1276 /1169® 69,626 13 092 $4,962 last t30~136 - TOTAL -D!6[6H?NAIE _._..lSa~-7A6 ••016 PHASE-- - - 610DIN0 21, ADVERTISENaNT 0 4 2 1L U . PRE-tl[G .CONFERENCE 3. 010 CIPCNI14il 6ENYON 4 j 4 12 1) 6. FAA APPLICATION 6 2 61 REVteN 0106 6. PN/6C 4 4 4 a Q IWIMYAL a 26 4 TOTAL 01D PFUSE a 4 1 1664 62.020 1646 6166 $132 03,7% d ' r , ~1. 12 , J' 1 7 1 o A --CONSTRl70r1ON PHASE-- collsrnucTloN 1, f%EC DOCUHEN78 t 2 3 PRE-CONST-0OW 0 OtNION , 4 6 6 2 16 S. b1r!•V161Ty. (6 tr101) b 36 6 6. 66 O A, $Hoe OW6 REVIEW i 6. OUALTTY CONTROL. 2 2 A "TOTAL I Y2 65 14 6 as ° 1134 11,3W l3, 909 01,134. 1264 16,637 . CLOSEOUT ° 1. RECORD WAO 4 6 12. 2, WARRAHrY INSPEOTION 3 b SUSTOTAL 9 6 17 ° M. 1376 $1,678 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PtWF 47,7tS Q Total Peofeot hours 7 90 433 96 2421- 66 976 O Tetol PrOJ40t Labor 1975 19,900 13$,774 17,936 113,724 11,6411 167,267 AAAEXPEN6ESA Trav4l Ewp40141 1861 _ Coapvt4r CKp4064 13% DE814M CHASE 0 rrlntln9 Expanse 61,1" LA604 i68, 746 O4naral IIN"MA4 $66 E%PEN6E6 63,600 coo E9PEN6E 11,426 - MUCH $6,266 TOTAL EXMtNOF. 11,166 TOTAL. 166,646 AAAADOITIONAL SERVICE6461 11I0 hose 61MVEYINO NA (6uw4Y. by city 6f D4nten) LAIM - 13,796 OEOTECH CONSULTANT 160 184 E%PENS0 $466 - TOTAL 46,259 - TOTAL 1612<b C041RUCTION MIAsa L"Oo 17, 716 Es7ENWO '..6659 ' TOTAL 16, 36b ' f b N TOTAI. $71,407 0"noT TOTAL 177,667 . ,.....-....a-. _ -w _e i.• y w ..a rw wfraw WMkJ+c a n u»•• ~ ~ , ' u 4i.• ~ , ,rS )C n ti 3l Clf ~~~tf, ~ 1 J~`~1~~. 5551{ J. R s`J 7d s '[t l~. .:"I[••-.. ..1n, ar t„als i4'.i? x. . . < ,sr.~ti kry:' i.<.n ...u.,..~a .ux.. v.rtud, a.u .a.Y.. x. wixa._r,ro,v..,...nd.,n. DIMTOM NOMICIPAL AIRPORT k!V IN 1040, IXTIXSION AN" IV DMINAOt"IXPROU"t"6 TA61lNAMXOUk SUNNARV XARON 10,1942 VISION ?MASS PH P1 tS PIC. $a CHO Will. Y V ..INO TXON NOAD PROC TOTAL PRrLTMTNAAY 1. CONrULWCS / DIXTOM 6 6 6 ' Is 7. PM/QC 1U1-TOTA4 6 6 6 1 1 22 6111 1166 81/6 19 666 11,121 PksL "OR, AtPORT 1. PTtLD 1URVEYS 1 16 26 61 3. WONT A COST SST 1 26 1 6 6 67 A. AtY1tM 1 DUTCH 1 1 / IA 8UI7OT46 2 16 61 31 i 111 6211 $1JO0 11,911 61,111 6104 671111 PAS, DIS10X 1. PAU DRAVIXOS 16 126 16 162 3SO 2. PAIL. SUCirICATIO0 2 16 9 2 1 $6 31 COST RITINATI 2 36 / 1 21 ASVIFM 41 UNION / 4 / 1 0 S. PNlOC S01-TOTAL 2 2 4 6 4 26 11 166 31 111 11 311 6271 12,611 112,044 63476 06,161 6331 626,212 FINAL VISION 1. f1NAL DRAVIN01 1 62 lZ 94 196 it SP1CIrICATIONI / 22 8 24 61 3, 00119 1 UNION / / 1 RIVISIONI E 2 12 22 61 TtSTINO PLAN 6 2 2 if 6. PN/OC 2 / 6 4 14 WI-TOTAL 2 16 126 31 116 26 311 6271 61,611 19,121 11,692 61,913 6166 62/,116 CONSIAUCTION P1A61 IIDDIMD 1. AOY1R1' ULN'T 1 / 2 It 2. PAC-090 CONfUtNC1 / / 6 It I, BID OPINIM/ DLXTOM / ?AA AtfLICATIOX 6 2 i , d. RCYIIV BIDS / / ` 6. PM/OC 1 1UITOIA1 1 46 1 1 - 6 66 5111 62,126 56/1 $as 6132 (3,711 y ~ 4 1' I 1 -BI O ~r 1 t i I ~ 1 t+l I I , o ` _ o 1 4 coMSrlacnoN ' 1, txtc Docu2urNTa t 9 3 2, mg-tow cot 0 Dt"ON A 6 6 2 11 3. SITS VHM 4 trips) 1 36 6 6 li 4. AAOp DV0 RiTBY / 6 QUALITY CONTROL r' 2 2 4 MTOTAL 1 12 61 16 $ /6 1139 71,200 03,901 $1,134 $264 $6,627 CwStOvT ! 1. ACCORD DNOS 4 / 12 2. VARRANTY INSPECTION 6 6 6UITOM 9 6 11 $712 6376 0,071 Total Noura 7 96 43) 91 292 66 976 LASOA $ 13 $9,110 833,174 47093 1131721 $1,t41 $61,211 1 s"90ta Tra+al (Design) $142 Trawl (Coast') 6112 Corputer Lxpeaee $396 prlntial xxpepfo $1,206 Oanaral Upiooe $66 CUD txrtxtt $1,92f TOTAL uptNli $6,07) TOTAL AASIC ASAMS1.. W011 i 6URYtY CONSULT, 611,464 QZOTtCH CONSULTAUT 16,960 TOTAL $21,660 TOTAL ADDITIONAL SUVI $21,4$0 I PROJECT TOM 191,9/1 • .«~.w,a. ..y.., t, ~ r -rr,- Ml.4@141 ,,r.y .u N,n,. LY h f i . i I ;'IRfGAI FUN1 N01 t OI~S1191 aNOUNf IdOUNI ONO 9M7vNl ANOVkt ANNO t0I11 AaOUNf ROUR AttOUNE RAN( ! QPjStJ81 i D?j1QI36 ! cq)O18? E CPJlO/40 ! 091JOJP! ! QllW, RUINUES t0!-OOr•ABBi 011 INI(Rl11 Wool 19.112M 1LSIt Q1 rl,9Sl.61 171 001 d8E1 dp6 KEW £RON BONG 9AIE SOD,OPD OQ 500,400,04 AOI dOt APS? 1171 FfEa14N ON 80NOS SOEO 71 k13 11P,lS SIP,dlLSI i1,S17.OS G OG Q.dO 0.00 O;DD SI?,!N S9 EIPWITUAES AVAIIAEI! ACCOUNT NQ76EP ACDGVNE NANI 8P7GE1 P 1/JIJP'r HOW ~Dl 001 AfSl SJOS 8MUN6~I (GAPNENi ~ !;'r69 O4 7,06d,OD 1,11500 I4E•OP7 AeE1 dE01 MUMS, (0881 d TIMERS W.177.00 m'S61.01 S3,?J7,?1 IDI O41 AP£1 5101 OFAiRM !S,l7S.00 I5,07.61 MIR 41 04t AE'21 ?S01 17(Mt S011GfS Ii,EI1,G4 35,11?.6S 11I M2.01 141 (nr•APE'•b4G'r QAAnI fUNOENd 75, 1(1 A0 11,915lJ ~1}:'.dE !Di OC1•A3B1 .9S0G Ff~UhD P50FdlA (NAfiES iS,9uD,0O E,111.OP 8,dE4,0O IQl )Dr A681-?1P3 PtEI(t NACuw S,79Q,D0 !,?P8.DD1 O~Qd 161 JOt dddt +Inf NAfNINEAP S EQUIfN(,NI N.110.)Q 71,19").00 O,Ofi Ir, 171 A8E7.0;:,-4SP't !P!flAl SEQYILrS 0.04 1P,847.{1 (13,;lO.I1) tOQ 000 CG. ...147.91(.9? t t,091.P1 1 %ot FEY(8U(5 Io me SIt,1N,S'~ In 3U06E1 iSD'1,'JO0.001 Pai45(! 11,171.SP • 1064 kEOVO 1D Ofl£ 511, 111, (`r loll( 81;0)1100 l39i,99$,091 t r..w.s.a-. ..y+v.w-.-w.w. w .u.r.r. rau ~AiY1Y3:'. P. Ytt...-.. ! 1,' r 1• o; t US.D"M)" Soulhwesl R eglon Foditflh,Ye-as18193.ODOO o(Ronspoftotloe Nkansas, Lou a ana, Ftdwd AVkMw New Mexico, Oklahoma, AdmWsfl ollm Texas JAN 4 J 1992 The Honorable Bob Castleberry Mayor of Denton 215 East McXinney Street Denton, TX 76201 I Dear Mayor Castleberryt Your request for assistance under the Airport Smprovement program, as authorized by the Aviation Safety and Capao£ty Expansion Act of 1990, for Denton Municipal Airport has been approved for Fiscal Year 1992. The allocation is as follows: Federal Fundst $113,760 -p If, Project No.: 3.48-0067-05-92 Development) Acquire land for north and south runway protection zones (55.7 acres), This allocation may be used only for the development described above. You will note that the allocation does not contain all of the funds and development you requested. our airport representative, Mr. Willie Villalobos, will contact you within 7 days to provide any assistance you may need and to work with you to establish a project schedule, This schedule will inolude a timely grant offer being made based on 'land costs established by appraisal and review appraisal. This allocation is tentative and will remain valid so long as the project , o formulation is proceeding on an established schedule, Failure to most the schedule will jeopardize project funding and could lead to withdrawal of the {06kbahtyle We look forward to workI ng 'w,ithVy ur~at ~and' your staff toward the successful Completion of this project, Sincorely, v Coorg6 D. Conley Manager, TeXae Airport Development Office TOOtTHER WE SUCCUD .urr..Ya ...ra.f-..M.. ~ ' r~uW ✓~Y4, LY'. - W(C' . 4- 'I r i 1 f .'...ry k 4 G; Ir i i i LIE E j ..w.....«..~«.n....».. ~ ~ ..`..a.:;: .war-. q ~ 4