Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-26-1993 ~I I CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET JANJARY 26, 1993 AQM414b11f. AGENDA no-/ ~f CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL ffw /y/ Work Session of the City of Denton City Co,incil on Tuesday, January 260 1993 at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: 5:15 p.m. 1. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding amendments to the Sign Ordinance and give staff direction. Following the conclusion of the Work Session item, the council will reconvene in the City Manager's Conference Room to discuss the following: 1. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. e(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Continuation of the annual evaluations of the City Manager, City Attorney, and Municipal Judge. C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1993 at oOclock (a.m.) (P.m.) - - CITY SECRETARY NOTE: THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCI?. CHAMBERS IS ACCESSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 18 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 566-8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX SO THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE. ACCOOODD .L. -J rr CITY,. i :::r COUNCII art II't ~t• ri Q~or a• a ~ 4 ♦ ~ ~ O b O Q O k t t QQO~ ~ t3G0~ I ; DATE: January 26,GM9 NO- 0 TO: Mayor and Members of the city Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Sign Ordinance Amendment RECOMMENDATION: I The agenda item is written broadly to enable Council to discuss any sign issue, however staff is specifically requesting direction concerning temporary stake signs. ~&BY: Attached are draft ordinance sections concerning temporary ground signs. BACKGROUND: During the last Council work session on January 5, 19930 Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance which would regulate stake signs as temporary signs and to address content neutral legal principles. PROGR MS DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS A ZE.C : Sign Ordinance amendment process. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Respectfully submitted: Prepared by; ~ I'LfiG1.G~ Llo d Harrell, City anager ,r n ob ns, AICP Executive Di ector of Planning and Development Axxoo2Ao 405664 N1 1.3.x:1 Ager0aItem_. Yrle / 2 ~ - q.3 Streets defined: Local - A street whose sole purpose is to provide access to abutting single-family or two-family residential properties. it is designed to serve no more than five thousand (5,000) vehicle trips per day. Collector - A street whose main purpose is to collect and di- rect traffic from local streets to arterial streets,, to carry traffic between arterial streets or to provide access to abut- ting commercial or industrial properties or higher intensity residential land uses.' It is designed to handle no more, than ten thousand (10,000) vehicle trips per day. Secondary Arterial - A'street whose main purpose is to serve as a major; route from one (1) area of the city to another, as a connection between one (1) pr'mary arterial to another or to provide a major., route to on (1) or more of the city's moderate activity centers. Primary Arterial - A street, ; icluding freeways, whose main purpose is to serve as a major route into, out of or across the city or connect nne (1) ort )re of the city"s major activ- ity centers. NOTES Collector and arterial. :Teets and freeways are shown on the city of Denton's Thorot1j fare plan and the Collector Street Napa Tem»orarv sign means an on-prw Ise ground sign that is used to communicate or adv®rties a single, ent which has not yet occurred and which is temporary in nature. examples of temporary signs in- clude, but are not limited to, s' ms advertising grand openings, future construction projects and kal estate listings. Wall sigg means any sign, of er than a wind device, wholly af- fixed to, supported by or painter upon the wall of any building and which is not a projecting sign. SECTION II. That Chapter .3 of the Code of Ordinances relat- ing to "Signs and Advertising -evices" is hereby amended by delet- ing the last clause of the p;.agraph defining the term in Section 33-4, entitled "Signs on pLalic property" and by adding to and revising the definition entitled "Signs obscuring or interfering with view" so that hereafter paragraphs (4) and (8) of Section 33- 4, entitled "Prohibited signs" shall hereafter be defined and read as follows: (4) Signs 4.ILPuubliQ property. Any sign located on or attach- ed to a public street light, utility pole, hydrant, PAGE 2 v Agenda Hem,._.ZL:.1r , . i section 33-211. Temporary sign. i (a) A temporary sign shall be considered a ground sign and shall be permitted only according to the standards for ground signs except that a temporary sign not larger than thirty two (32) square feet in effective area need not be permitted ifs (i) the supporting struoture )f this sign is not larger than one in which two perimeter ditnenrions are greater than four (4) inches or (ii) one in which the diameter is not greater than four (4) inches; (b) No more than one (1) off-promises sign advertising the sale or lease of one (1) piece of real property or one (1) real estate subdivision or development; sign is placed on any one (1) premise; I (c) No temporary sign shall be located within any public street, median or within ten (10) feet of any curbline. r (d) ;A temporary sign shall be removed within ten (10) days after the event being communicated or advertised on the sign has occurrsd. SECTION XVII. That chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances re- lating to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by adding a new Subsection (a) and revising the former introduction and subsections of Section 33-212, entitled "Wind device signs," so that hereafter such section shall read as follows: (a) wind device' identification tag. The building, official or his designee shall issue a registration tag to the wind device per mittee. The wind device permittee shall cause the tang to be af- fixed in a conspicuous place on the permitted wind device. (b) The provisions of this chapter regulating wind device signs shall not apply to the following: (1) Texas or U.S. flags No permit shall be required , to display one (1) U.S. or one (1) Texas flag, or both, on any one premise. If the exempted flags are displayed on flagpoles in the manner of a ground sign, the number, height, size, and spacing requirements applicable to ground signs shall not apply, but the flags and poles shall maintain the required setbacks for ground signs. (2) ,Exempted flag, on a premise, no permit shall be required to display one (1) flag that meets the PAGE 13 i I HANDOUT TO CITY COUNCIL 1-26-93 ground an means a sign, other than a wind device sign, whose principal support is provided by burying, anchoring or otherwise connecting the sign, or supporting structure thereof, to the ground ~tr"saeh-a---~nat►ne r-eleeated-r and which is not a et sign. nr portable sign or attached ti2nume- n,_t n means a ground sign, other than a wind device sign; which is solid from the ground up, and made of stone, concrete, metal, routed wood planks or beams, brick or similar materials. `A monument sign shall be solid from the ground up and the pole(s);or support shall he concealed. off-premises sign means any sign advertising a business, activity, goods, products or services not usually located on the premises where the sign is located or which directs persons to any premises other than where the sign is located. i Qn-premises sign means any sign advertising the business activity, goods, products or services g Person, offered for sale on the premises where theisign lisllocat d,.sAlsign ~ which promotes or thought, belief, opinion yoraother tnoncommercialumessage shallcbe considered an on-premises sign. i Portable sign means a sign whose principal supporting structure is intended, by design, use or construction, to be used by resting upon the ground for support and which may be easily moved or relocated for reuse. Portable signs shall include but not be limited to signs mounted upon or designed to be mounted upon a trailer, bench, wheeled carrier or other nonmotorized mobile structure, with or without wheels, and A-frame and other similar signs, resting or leaning on the ground or other structures, but not permanently attached thereto. Stake sign means a temporary sign whose supporting structure is usually so designed or shaped, usu" so as to be erected and usually used b king one end pointed, hammering or forcing it into the ground by hand orshand~heldudevice so as to allow quick and easy placement, removal or relocation. A ssttvuet-uve-or-y~ at - a-4nsta1l-Elre-saHpert nq nefi~ea-b5"-feet ~rd-F memccrarv titan means a ground sign that is used to communicate or advertise a single event which has not yet occurred and which to temporary in nature. Lxamples of temporary signs, include, bat are notlimited td signs advertising grand openingis$ future construction projects and real estate listings. i Section 33.211. Temporary S' n, A temporary sign shall be considered a ground sign and shall be allowed only according to the standards for ground signs except: (1) A temporary sign shall not be larger than thirty two (32) square feet in effective area; (2) No more than one (1) off-premise sign advertising the sale or lease of one (1) piece of real property or one (1) real estate subdivision or development shall be placed on any one (1) premise; (3) No temporary sign shall be located within any public street median or within ten (10) feet of any eurbline (4) A temporary sign shall be removed within ten (10) days after the event being communicated or advertised on the sign has occurred. (5) The supporting structure of this sign is not larger than one in which two perimeter dimensions are greater than four (4) inches or one in which' the diameter is not greater than four (4) inches. Staff Notes: • A sign supported by stakes which is not used as a temporary sign shall be considered a ground sign and shall be permitted according to the standards for the number of signs allowed per premise. A portable sign is not a temporary sign. Bea. 33-62. Exemptions. The following signs shall be exempt from the permit requirements of this chapter: (1) Wall signs over fifteen (15) feet or less in height. (2) Legal notices. (3) State, Preen#se #dent#€#eat#en € Flags as specified in Section 33-212 (4) Signs painted on glass surfaces of windows or doors. (5) Stake Temporary signs. (For Residential and Non-Residential Districts) (4) Number of around signs. Only one ground sign, which is not `a temporary sign, shall be located on any one premise, except as follows: a. Any premise having frontage on more than one (1) freeway, arterial or collector street may locate one (1) on- premise ground sign in the defined front yard of each street, provided that neither sign is located within that area that includes the overlapping front yards of both streets. b. Any premise which has more than five hundred (500) feet of public street frontage on a freeway, arterial, or collector street may make use of one additional sign for each five hundred (500) feet )f additional frontage on that street, or fraction thereof, if each additional sign permitted is located more than sixty ,(6O €eur ndree1 (400). feet from another permitted ground sign on the same premise. The distance between the signs shall be measured along the curbline, from and between the two (2) points on the curbline which are nearest the two (2) signs. C* Temporary signs. See Section 33.211. D ICI FILE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET FEBRUARY 21 1993 AGENDA- z CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL February 2, 1993 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, February 2, 1993 at 5:15 p,m. in the Civil Defense Room of Ci'y Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: r NOTE: Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may also be considered as part of the Agenda for the Regular Session. e E 5:15 p.m. 1. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters - Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Consider action in Re: Flow. 2. Consider action in the condemnation cases of City of Denton v. Cole Trust No. 1, City of Denton v. . John Porter, et ux and C1tV Of Denton v. Fryman 6 Wolski. 3. Consider action in Dallas County Park Cities Municipal Utility District v. City of Dallas and City of Grapevine. I B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Consider acquisition of an easement for a water transmission line to proposed Lake Ray Roberts Water Plant. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 2. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the Capital Improvement Program budgeting process and distribution of Budget Priority Questionnaire. 3. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding Sammons Communication's basic service tier restructuring. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, February 2, 19930 in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: 7:00 p.m. 1. Pledge of Allegiance I aq~nct~~lo ~ cc S AgAndf 11ert1 City of Denton City Council Agenda February 2, 1993 Page 1 2. Consider approval of the minutes of the Regular Sessivn of January 51 1993. 3. Public Hearings A. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance designating the property at 915 West Oak Street a historic landmark under article V of the comprehensive zoning ordinance. (The Planning and Zoning Commission and the Historic Landmark Commission unanimously recommend approval.) B. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas, amending the sign regulations of chapter 33 of the Code of ordinances by adding terms to enhance enforcement of the ordinance in sections 33-1, 33-1210 33-126, 33-149, and 33-166; by amending definitions in sections 33-2, 33-30 33-4 and 33- 91; by amending section 33-62 regarding flags; by amending section 33-65 regarding wind device signs; by amending section 33-95 regarding destruction and repair; by adding a section 33-98 regarding nonconforming sign permits; by adding a section 33-127 regarding certificates of occupancy; by amending section 33-146 regarding manner of measurement, and illustrating sign copy; by amending section 33-147 regarding abandoned signs and supporting structures; by adding a section 33- 148 regarding sign face standards; by amending section 33-181 regarding signs in residential districts; by amending section 33-182 regarding signs in non- residential districts and particular monument signs; by amending section 33-183 regarding planned development and special sign districts; by amending section 33-184 regarding wind devices (banners) and temporary signs in central business districts; by amending section 33-231 regarding temporary signs; by adding a section 33-212 re- garding wind device signs (banners) and flags; by deleting section 33-213 regarding replacing or altering nonconforming ground signs; by repealing article 6 including sections 33-221 through 33-226 and adopting a new article 6 and a section 33-221 regarding illustrations; by amending section 33-253 regarding sign plans; by consolidating sections 33-254 and 33-255 regarding creation, review of plans and criteria for sign districts; by amending section 33-256 regarding conditions imposed upon sign districts. (The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval.) City of Denton City Council Agenda February 2, 1993 Page 3 4. Consent Agenda Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. j Listed below are bids and purchases orders to be approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back- up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 5.A, 5.B, 5.C, 5.D). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss or withdraw an item prior to approval of the Consent Agenda. Upon the receipt of a "request to speak" form from a citizen regarding an item on the Consent Agenda, the item shall be removed and be considered before approval of the Consent Agenda. A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid 111443 - Medical Supplies 2. Bid 41449 - Fleet Vehicles 3. Bid 41452 - Collection Services 4. Bid 41454 - Data Multiplexer Channel Bank Equipment 5. Bid 41457 - 12 CY Dump Truck 6. Bid 41458 - Rear Load Refuse Truck 7. Bid 41459 - Circuit Breaker Conversion 8. Bid 41448 - Reroof Service Center 9. P.O. 432132 - A. 1. S Continental 10. P.O. 497167 and $97168 - Change Order 48 - Martin K. Fby B. Plats and Replats 1. Consider the preliminary replat of Lots 1 and 2, Into Lot 1R, Block 1 of the Santa Fe Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval by a vote of 7-0.) C. Tax Refunds 1. Consider approval of a tax refund to Robert Croissant for $774.95. 2. Consider approval of a tax refund to Republic Title Co./Albert Herron for $642.37. I Cate x_93 City of Denton City Council Agenda February 2, 1993 v Page 4 3. Consider approval of a tax refund to Teresa Hayes for $884.51. 5. Ordinances A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bide and awarding a contract for purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. (4.A.1. - Bid #1443, 4.A.2. - Hid #1449, 4.A.3. - Bid #1452, 4.A.4. - Bid #1454, 4.A.5. - Bid 01457, 4.A.6. Bid #1458, 4.A.7. Bid #1459) B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. (4.A.8. - Bid #1448) C. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the execution of Change Order No. 8 to a contract between the City of Denton and Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc.= and providing for an increase in the contract pric-a. (4.A.10. - P.O. 097167 and #97168) D. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. (4.A.9. - P.O. #32132) E. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving the purchase of a utility easement from Charles Betzel (Ray Roberts Transmission Water Line Project.) F. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending the fees for sign permits to provide a fee for signs larger than two hundred fifty (250) square feet, for special exception petitions, and for wind devices erected across streets. G. Consider adoption of an ordinance directing the ' publication of notice of intention to issue City of Denton Utility System Revenue Bonds, and directing the issuance and publication of notice of sale of said bonds. H. Consider adoption of an ordinance directing the issuance and publication of notice of sale of City of Denton General obligation Bonds. Ono NO e,51-6- oats City of Denton City Council Agenda February 2, 1993 Page 5 6. Resolutions A. Consider approval of a resolution approving an interlocal ambulance agreement between the City of Denton and Denton County for ambulance services. I 7. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. 8. Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 9. New Business This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 10. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-11 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(9), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. NOTE: THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT IS LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE. C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of _ 1993 at ____o'clock (a.m.) (P.m.) CITY SECRETARY ti a0eada~teaL Dale City of Denton city council Agenda February 2, 1993 Page 6 NOTE: THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IS ACCESSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 566-8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS E DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX SO THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE. + ACCOOODE I 1 i I I 1 ♦t K ~`'}T ~ ♦7•~f ~ {~ii~ Iii II } iY 1i+ Y "µr~ ,F .:t CITY COUNCIL YXil: i i i ~I ~DP D/ tr s O a O a oa n 11MITT: m: 'Elm ~o ~ oo AW4~r11a D s vfz , .-3 MYO VENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU: Kathy DuBose, Director of Accounting and Budget Operations FROM: Jon Fortune, Management Services Administrator X DATE: January 26, 1993 SUBJECT: 1994-98 CIP BUDGET CALENDAR I am pleased to provide this year's capital improvements program budget calendar for your review. This year's calendar was designed to receive council and community input early in the budget process. Council input begins February 2, 1993 when the Budget Priority Questionnaire, which allows you to priority rank service areas, is distributed. The questionnaire is due back in at budget office on February 12, 1993. Community input is obtained in a joint Planning and Zoning Commission and Public Utilities Board Hearing held February 10th at 6:30 pm in the Council Chambers. Please feel free to attend this important meeting. I believe the attached calendar will enable this year's CIP budget season to be efficient and very productive for the City of Denton. If you have any questions or comments regarding this year's CIP calendar, please let me know. Thank you, AFF0004 V71666-8200 7/588.8200 DIFW METRO 434.2529 Agenda No A9W$1tK__.6L_5 J01 Dam Capital improvements Budget Calendar'` j 1994-98 February 2 (Toes) City Council briefing on capital Improvement Program budgeting process. Priority Qlestionnaire to Council. February 10 (Wed) Public Utilities Board and Planning and zoning Commission hold a Public Hearing to receive input from community regarding capital Improvement Program. (Council chambers - 6:30 P.M.) February 12 (Fri) City council priority questionnaire due to Budget Office February 17 (Wed) City Staff Capital Improvement Sudgat Kick-Off (Council Chambers - 10:00 a.m.) March 3 (Wed) Public Utilities Beard holds a work session to review Utilities Capital Improvement Plan. General Government Capital Improvement Program staff requests prioritized by Dire.-tor due to k`f Budget office for review and analysis. Public Utilities Board receives preliminary working draft of Utilities Capital improvement Plan for work session. March 22 (Mon) Public Utilities Board work session on Utilities Capital Improvement Plan. March 29 (Mon) General Government Fifth Year Capital Improvement requests are presented to Executive Staff for consideration. (Civil 4 Defense Room from 10:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m., Lunch provided) April 2 (Fri) Executive Staff rankings due to Budget office. 1 Agoda No 93 -oa 5 Apeodaltem Dom CIP Budget Calendar 1994-98 Page 2 April 12 (Mon) Executive Staff discussion of priority ranking-- "Draw the line" (Civil Defense Room from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon) April 14 (Wed) Final draft Utilities CIP due to Budget office April 19 (Mon) Public Utilities Board's final recommendation of Utilities Capital Improvement Flan. April 26 (Mon) Executive Staff reviews General Government Five year CIP plan and formulates recommen- dation to be forwarded to Planning and Zoning Commission. (Civil Defense Room, from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon) May 12 (Wed) Presentation to and discussion of Capital Improvement Plan by Planning and Zoning Commission. May 26 (Wed) Planning and Zoning Commission and PUB hold a public hearing in a special meeting and considers a recommendation. (Council Chambers 6:00 p.m.) June 15 (Tues) CIP presented to Council in Worksession. September 7 (Tues) Final approval by Council of first year only year 1994-99 CIP budget. APP00499 Rev. 01/22/93 i 1,,.. Li I i ICITY'-MUI 1 - COUNCIL 22 A+ Mr XT: O t, i o Ggg ITT XT O 1: X TT: ~o p t •4~0 000 J,inuary 21, 1992 { CITY COUNC11, REPORT FOkMA'T APM#No AT AQB itli~. ~-5 as 3 TO: M,iyui anti Munibt:r s of the ('i l.y Ccnruci l l~L4 , FROM: Lloyd V. Hanel], t'ity Manager SLILf,11;r:'I': SAMYONS COMMUNICATIONS PNUYUSEU HASIC SERVICE 'PIER I?I,,STktP,^1,11k ING f R1?c'rrp'h11,;tJl)A'!'t() PJ: The c:ablu Te1eViStUtl Advisory Hoard r'eCOITI1Tends that the City negot.idLe with Sdmmulls Communicat.ions a Lempurcuy waiver of the Cil.y's IpplicaLion to the E'CC tot basic Lier regulatory cerLifica- t.ion subjca:l. to the SL fpUlations set out below and Legal beparLmefit, dIII)I Ova 1 . Si1Mh1AkY HAr'F;CkUUfJU: '11W C,lb]e Te1eViSiQfI COTISUtner ProLection rind CompeLiLion Act of 1997 provides for the reinst-iLUtion of rate regulation for basic, cable sk~rvit:c: in those areas where effective competition does nol_ exist.. In Urdct to exercise this rate regulation authority, local gove111ITI ICS must. apply for and receive certification (ruin the Fedut,il Conununic:dt-ions Corivnission (FCC) . The Act also prohibits c, bf e upot'JI.ors f tom re(pd r inq their customers Lo subscribe to any ofAw t service Liet than Lhe basic tier as a condition of access to olhet c;,ihla services. In addition, the Act appears Lo encourage cable operators to rustruct.w e Lhair basic service tier to provide hasiu service al- the lowest, possible cost. to subscribers. CoNsis I.enl. with these ptoviSiOfIS, SdInmons CORUTIIInicat ions proposes to rusl.[ucLurt: its hasic service tier. Under this resLrucLuriny, Ihu basic tier would be Called LIFEl,1NE1 and would consist: of local area broadclaNt. c.:halmols, access channels, and superstat.ions I'll'; dud wGN it $9.95 monthly. The remaining channels on the current basic tier would be grouped together under a tier called spa,,, tUM PLUS at. $6.R', pur mont-11. 't'aken LogeLher, the monthly cost of Lhe two new I.iers would Itot e:h.trule from Lhe cutrenL monthly cost. Of basic: ' surrvJca:, $lb.eo. Conseclucrlt,ly, Lhis rest.racturinq would (NI,Ible Sanun()tlS Lo iri(AA rcrgc,rlatory recluireRrenLS while mainLainirnq it's matkeLin~I Lat.itudu. No c2J -M l ';nrolr^uri:; r •~.~^;r;ufl I ~ •nr t urln Ape~daltenl...,1~.~.~'..._,..._ z ~ A I As nrigin.,l ly [,ropoSeri, rus l.vaiers wisIt i1' t.o subscribe Lo Lhe new SI'II,r"I'kUM PIOUS; t_ior would be requirad Lo uLilire converter Loxes provided by SiJjIIrllUn5• Rased ul,c,;n Sunmans' esLiriwtes, Lhis require- would in r_xcoss of f>,900 customers and would create suhr;tanl. is I di f f ir7ul t i es fur Service provided at, LIMP and TWU dor'nituries. lliStoriCatly, IIIV current rer7uiremenL to utilize cortverier haXeS in order Lo receive premium services, such as HDO, Showlime, ethris gcneratc~d numerouS compfairits over the (liver[ the rgreaL cumber of cult-orner affected by t_he new requirement, sL,lt mt.icip-rtes substantial t.111muil relative Lo this matter. In ordct to avoid Such LrlrmoiI and ease the pains of the resttuc- I. urin(}, thc! staff has been working with Sammons on optional methodS of implelru:ntat ion. Fortunately, there appears to be or,e viable ,,II rnative which would eliminate the converter box requirement, for I.hc subscriber Of SPECII UL,,j pt.US, As wriLLen, t.hr, Act appcarS to allow Lhe City of Denton Lo ,apply for and rece1 ve cer1. i f ica t.ioil f Tom Lhe Pederal Conunu~Iica LiOns conunis sior) to reyulaLe the basic service tier rate as of April 3, 1991 one o[,rt,ion would involve Lhe Cit-y temporarily waiving its appJieat.iori for certification for up to one year. During this per iari, Suumorls will continue with its rebuild throughout its er,t.irc service area which also includes the cities of Lake Dallas, Corinth, Shady Shares, and Hickory Creek. When the rebuild is cotr[pluted, sarrunonS will be able to "trap" out unwanted channels it. Lhe pole, Lhus elirninat.irig the need for converter boxes, Nt:C royulal_ions implementing Lhe Act must be in place by April 3, 1995• Thasrr Iegulilt. ions affecting certificaLion and the proposed resLrnc:LUring MAY or may noL allow an adJUSUneriL period beyond this date. II they do not, Sammoris must he prepared to implement the testrucLuring by April 3, including Lhe delivery of converter boxes aS requested. ConSequunt-ly, S,artunons requests that the City immediately consider it.s proposal and render a decision as Soun as possiblo. Thor;, S,atauuns will have sufficient lead Lime during wlIich LU of I ect. the r eSt. I, UC,tr,ri nq. The City's waivet of certification would only he Lemporary and woulri riot prUiudicu the City's right to apply for .and receive cur1.if icat.fon it, a later date. Similar[ Would tiot ' affect, the CiLy'S right. t_o assume and implemoflt.wfull rregulaLory auLhorit.y In ,tl ol.her locally re,ulat.ed areas permiLtud under S , 1J„ i I I Ago We No tinrolr,tuNS r,,ro,rnlrur nrlurls AQAadaIWL._ 4616 e3 d,uut,iry ?.7, 1!)`I"T. Ere l3 ~y3 Uri ~I,iuuary l!>, IT)i, t.t:e Cutrlul Televisiorn Advisory board {('ATV) nw1, to rarnsider t.l,is opl.ioil Subseyuontly, the Board wianiincwsly voted rt, II1:c,mou2nd 01jI_ the Cil.y nelot.iaLe with Sammons to temporarily ochry il,s al,pl icot_ion for re,lul,,tory certiI ica tion with the I o I II)wiif l st ipul+rl ions: 1. S~,uu:ums will nol r,rise its basic service Licr rate during the waiver f,erlutl. 1. The waiver puriod will end when Sa:runolts' rebuild is ;unr;rudud or alter a period of up to one year, whichever curucs first. i CkUIII'A AE'I'f?i"I'IIll: Cit.y of DI"III.uI I, SJIIBIIUlIs CorrunuI I icaLions , Cable TV subscribers, and Uunto1) Ci 1. i zons. f' 1SCA1 IMPACT: Undutermined. 41~ fullysubmiil_ted, Gr, Ilurrell City Marta(lar I'r epu t ed by bill AngcIo 1) iracLo r ul Communil.y Sur vices Approved Oy: , r. P. V. Nelson flxucuLiVU llilcol.ur of M.Mt.ios I'✓f.4r~/.4 1~ f }f}I} } ♦ +j 2 f$ C I T Y' COUNCIL € IjIrt t it i J-H • 0 to XXT TTI r 1° 14, } OoU~ oo~ a ~I V W-47 1 Agenda No , AQendaIISM_A%~. z oero _.~_7.z'93 CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ~1qV G /sib/ v~ J January 5, 1993 ! G The Council convened into the Work Session it 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins; Council Members Brock, Chew, Perry, Smith and Miller. ABSENT: None 1. The Council convened into the Executive session to discuss i legal matters (considered action in the condemnation cases of City of Denton v John Porter, et ux; City of Denton v Fryman & Wolskj; and City of Denton v M T Cole Trust) real estate and personnel/board appointments (considered appointments to the Ii Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission and the Historic Landmark Commission). 2. The Council received a report and held a disciission regarding amending the sign ordiAance and gave staff direction. Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that he would go through each issue recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission and make a final recommendation on each of those items. 1. Face Changing - the Planning and Zoning commission recommended allowing non-conforming signs to be altered so long as they were no more non-conforming. The temporary use permit/comply by January 1, 1996 provision would be deleted. Council Member Brock felt that the extreme position would be to allow any face changing as long as it would not be more non- conforming. An intermediate position would be to allow a change on a multiple face sign. Council Member Miller felt that the entire issue had been looked at and felt that the recommendation was for any sign to be changed. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins stated that she could support the recommendation. Council Member Smith asked if there would be a permit required to , change the face of a sign. Robbins replied yes that a permit would be needed to change the face. The sign could not be any more non-conforming. Council Member Smith asked if It wore still under the 606 rule. Robbins replied yes, Agendaltem~ ` City of Denton City Council Minutes ? `t January 5, 1993 Page z 1 Council Member Perry asked if the current standards in the ordinance would remain with the recommendation. 1 Robbins replied yes. Council Member Perry stated that a permit would not be issued if the sign did not comply with the ordinance chapter. Robbins replied yes that it would still apply. I Council Member Perry asked if a change in the ordinance would not j eliminate everything in the present ordinance. Robbins replied correct. Council Member Miller stated that if the sign were currently non - conforming, the rules and regulations would be changed. Non- conforming signs would have to be treated as a conforming sign relative to face changing and all other rules would apply. Council Member Brock expressed concern that changing this provision would invite anyone who wanted to be unpleasant long enough to continue to attack the sign ordinance. Word had gone out that it was hard to do business in Denton but that was not true. Would the Council be giving legitimacy to people who attacked the City by allowing these changes. She was concerned about the spin-off from these changes. If she supported this measure, she would not be willing to take new issues which might arise. Mayor Castleberry viewed the current position as a hardship on an existing business or future business and was receptive to the recommendation. Council Member chow stated that he had no problem with the face changes as long ad all signs could be changed. He would have a problem if the recommendation would apply only for a certain group of signs. He agreed with Council Member Brock that he would turn a deaf ear to anyone who wanted to talk regarding the sign + ordinance in the future. The chamber of commerce should be working with the Council to promote Denton and not be perpetuating the idea that Denton was a hard place to do business. Council Member Brock stated that she had a concern that in the public hearing the word "esthetics't had been used in conjunction with the sign ordinance. This was not an esthetics issue but was an economic issue. She did not want the position to develop that in the future, the City would have to say to a potential business or potential resident that they should not judge Denton by the way agenda Ifem,_!~5__ City of Denton City Council Minutes J r January 5, 1993 Page 3 it looked. This was a serious economic development issue. For the small business person sign regulation could be helpful as he did not have to get into sign competition. Council Member Miller pointed out that the council had put the item on the agenda. There had been no specific request that he knew about. It had come out of the last political campaign. The issue involved various people with different pointo of view and felt that it had been a bringing together process rather than a disagreeable process. He felt it was important on the how the Council did something rather than what. i j Consensus of Council was unanimous to direct staff to prepare an ordinance following the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning commission regarding face changing. 02. Abandoned signs and supporting structures - the Planning and Zoning recommendation was for a "use or lose" provision whereby abandoned signs and supporting structures could be used and grandfathered like other non-conforming signs, if the sign or supporting structure had a blank face or a bona fide sign within 90 days of passage of the ordinance. Council Member Perry asked what would have to be done in that 90 day period. Robbins stated that this existin; structure. The changeiino theaordinanceewould indicate that the sign would have to do have something done to it or it would have to be taken down. The sign would have to have a blank face or a message would have to be on it. Council Member Brock asked if the provisions would apply within 90 days after the sign had became abandoned. Robbins stated that a sign was not abandoned until it did not advertise a business for 6 months. Ninety days after that it would have to be used or lost. Safeguard issues included (1) there must be a solid, complete single color cover, (2) bagging or incomplete covering would be prohibited, (3) if there were no face, the face must be one which the structure was designed to carry, (4) a permit would be required, (5) a dilapidated or deteriorated condition must be abated, (6) blanking or using would not be allowed if it were over 60% of the sign's value, (7) no certificate of occupancy would be issued if there were an illegal sign on premises and (8) if the supporting structure was without a face, the face effective area must be conforming. Agenda No _2 s?0~5 Agendal}onL/r~5 City of Denton city council minutes ~~ct~/ January 5, 1993 Page 4 Council Member Brock asked if the safeguards would take care of Council Member Miller's previous concerns. Council Member Miller replied yes. There had been other language suggested by the Chamber but he did not know the difference between the two proposals. Mayor Castleberry asked if a sign were plastic and the business moved, would that blank face have to be replaced with plastic. Robbins replied not entirely. It could be painted if the entire j sign were painted. The Council might want to add to the ordinance that the sign may painted but that it could not bleed through. Consensus of Council was unanimous to direct staff to prepare an ordinance following the Planning and Zoning recommendation regarding abandoned signs and supporting structures. 13. Effective area calculation - the Planning and Zoning commission recommended (1) changing the enclosed area shape from a parallelogram to any regular shape or combination of shapes, (2) for signs with attached faces, measuring each race if the angle at attachment was greater than 45 degrees, and (3) measuring the copy area only of signs on walls, fences or buildings - the method currently used. Consensus of Council was unanimous to direct staff to prepare an ordinance following the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning commission regarding effective area calculation. 14, special sign district - the recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission was to decrease the qualifying frontage from 600 feet to 300 feet. Consensus of Council was unanimous to direct staff to prepare an ordinance following the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding special sign district. 15. Monument signs - the Planning and Zoning Commisaion ' recommended defining monument signs and increasing the effective area for monument signs on Loop 288 from 150 square feet to 200 square feet and on IN35 from 250 square feet to 300 square feet. Council Member Perry stated that the provision did not apply to any other areas other than those mentioned. Robbins replied correct that it only applied to two roads and only for monument signs. i Awds No Agenda Item ,!~,,~oZ Date City of Denton City Council Minutes Jar ?J~ January 5, 1993 G Page 5 Consensus of council was unanimous to direct staff to prepare an ordinance following the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning commission regarding monument signs. 06. Allowance of banners on building walls without a permit or standards - the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial and recommended adding a 30 day separation period between permits and required a display of a permit tag on permitted wind devices. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins asked for the current regulations. Robbins replied the current regulation was for 3 permits per year, 30 days per permit which could run consecutively. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins stated that the recommendation was more restrictive. Robbins replied yes because of the 30 day separation between signs. Council Member Smith stated that a business could have a sign for 30 days, then be without a sign for 30 days and then have a sign again for 30 days which would remove the provision for three a year. Robbins replied that the provision would remain to only have three per year. Council Member Miller asked if currently a permit was required. Robbins replied yes that it was a $20 fee, Council Member Miller stated that that would not change. Robbins replied correct. City Manager Harrell stated that this had been a provision which the City had been lax in enforcement. It would be enforced when the ordinance was passed. ' Mayor Castleberry asked if the city's provisions woull be in conflict with the State regarding lottery banners. Robbins replied no. Consensus of Council was, Council Member Miller indicating nay, to direct staff to prepare an ordinance following the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding denial of banners on buildings without a permit or standard. { twdl No City of Denton City Council Minutes January 5, 1993 { Page 6 Consensus of the Council was, Council Member Miller and Mayor Castleberry indicating nay, to direct staff to prepare an ordinance following the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning commission _ regarding a 30 day separation period between permits, 07. Disallow banners over streets - the Planning and Zoning commission recommended denial and to add a $60 fee to cover the cost of Utilities putting up and taking down these wind devices. Consensus of the Council was, Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins and Council Members Smith, Chew and Perry indicating nay, to direct staff to prepare an ordinance following the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding disallowing banners over streets. Consensus of the Council was unanimous to direct staff to prepare an ordinance following the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning commission to add a fee to put up and take down tho banners. 18, Temporary and stake signs - the Planning and Zoning commission recommended establishing a new category of regulated signs called temporary signs and to put stake signs in this category. Any size stake would be allowed to support the temporary sign. Robbins felt there might be a problem if any size stake were allowed. The recommendation was a 4X4 size stake with any message as long as it met the standards. Council Member Miller stated that the problem before appeared to be the size of the support. This was to be a temporary sign and not a permanent sign. Robbins replied correct that it might be a legal issue as to the definition of "temporary". City Manager Harrell stated that the Council could fall back on some time period. The Council did not want to create a loop hole for temporary signs to become permanent. Council consensus was unanimous to follow the recommendation of the 1 Planning and Zoning Commission regarding a 4x4 stake size prevision and to direct staff to work on appropriate legal language regarding the definition of "temporary". Due to time constraints, this item was continued during the Regular session under Miscellaneous Matters from the City Manager. 3. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding procedures for City of Denton elections and gave staff direction. r ` Agenda % Agenda ftem!E'S City of Denton City Council Minutes January 5, 1993 G Page 7 i This item was considered during Miscellaneous Matters from the City Manager. The Council convened into the Regular Meeting at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins; Council Members Chew, Perry, Smith and Miller. ABSENT: Council Member Brock 1. Pledge of Allegiance The Council and members of the audience recited the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. The Council considered approval of the minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 8, 1992. Perry motioned, Chew seconded to approve the minutes as presented. On roll vote, Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 3. The Council considered approval of a resolution of appreciation for Carmen Morales. Council Member Brock joined the meeting. The following resolution was considered: RA93-001 RESOLUTION IN APPRECIATION OF CARMEN MORALES Brock motioned, Chew seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins Faye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 4. Presentation of Keep America Beautiful National Award. The award was presented to Council by Dick Engle, Chair - Keep Denton Beautiful Board. He also presented a Certificate from the President regarding Keep American Beautiful and Keep Denton Beautiful. 1 Agenda No. Oc .5S AgenOdltem ~ ~ Z City of Denton City Council Minutes January 5, 1993 Page 8 5. Public Hearings A. The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance rezoning a 1.156 acre tract from the Multifamily - one (MF-1) District to the Planned Development (PD) District with a detailed plan on property located between Avenue A and McCormick, north of Greenlee and I-35, also known as the Greenhill Garden Apartments, for the purpose of a sorority residence and meeting hall. Z-92-022 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-0.) Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that the sorority proposed to use the existing apartment complex and the ordinance would be changing the use from apartment to sorority through a planned development. One of the main issues was off street parking. There was not enough off strest parking on site for the meeting room and the sorority. The sorority had developed a list of alternatives to get individuals to the meetings. It could not use off street parking when having meetings. The proposal exceeded the landscaping standards and intensity had already been allocated. The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor. I No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. The following ordinance was considered: No. 93-001 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR 1.156 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED EAST OF MCCORMICK STREET, WEST OF AVENUE A, AND NORTH OF GREENLEE STREET (COMMONLY KNOWN AS GREENHILL GARDEN APARTMENTS) FROM MULTIFAMILY-1 DWELLING DISTRICT (MF-1) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WITH CONDITI014 (PD (c)); PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A DETAILED PLAN; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ' Hopkins motioned, Perry seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye,', and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. • 1 [life - - City of Denton city council minutes January 5, 1993 11// Page 9 B. The Council held a public hearing and considered a proposal for a variance to Sections 34-124 (e) and (f) of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations, regarding drainage improvement requirements at Lakewood Addition, Lots 1-19, Block A. The approximately 22.7 acre development was located on the north side of Orchid Hill Lane, near its terminus at Pilot Knoll Park, in Denton's extraterritorial jurisdiction. V-64 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0.) 3 Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that this was a variance to two provisions of the drainage provisions of the subdivision regulations. One dealt with -*n underground drainage requirement and the second dealt with the regulations of open channel drainage. The variance was proposing to use the natural drainage which was in place. The Planning and Zoning Commission found that all three criteria had been net for variance requests. The Mayor opened tla public hearing. Tim Fleet stated that he had some pictures of the area for Council which indicated the natural draw of the drainage. i The Mayor closed the public hearing. Council Member Perry asked if the development would impact the flow of drainage on the Corps property. Robbins replied no. Hopkins motioned, Brock seconded to approve the variances. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 6. Consent Agenda Council Member Brock stated she had a question about Bid 01433, She did not understand why there was only one bidder and asked if the bid was in line with what was anticipated. Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that it was within the anticipated bid. Denise Harpool, Senior Buyer, stated that there probably was only one bidder as this was a large bore and the kind of equipment necessary was very costly. They had solicited from six firms who had the capabilities but some were busy with other jobs and others were not interested. AWdANO is ?.S City of Denton City Council Minutes lj January 5, 1993 Page 10 1 i Perry motioned, Smith seconded to approve the Consent Agenda as 1 presented. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", hopkins "aye,,, Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Ferry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. A. Bids and Purchase Orders: j 1. Bid 11436 - Distribution Transformers 2. Bid 01433 - Bore Across I-35 at Exposition Mills 3. Bid 11440 - Fire Station 14 Driveway 4. Bid 01447 - North Lake Parks II I 7. Ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and awarding a contract for purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. (6.A.1. - Bid 11436) The following ordinance was considered: No. 93-002 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES] PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE] AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Smith motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. (6.A.2. - Bid #1433, 6.A.3. - Bid 014400 6.A.4. - Bid 01447) ~7endaNo ~,~,.-GC ►~en,ta {tc`m,~~ City of Denton City Council Minutes January 5, 1993 Page 11 The following ordinance was considered: No. 93-003 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE _ AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving settlement in Smith v. City of Denton. The following ordinance was considered: No. 93-004 i AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A RELEASE IN THE MATTER OF SMITH V THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Smith motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 8. Resolutions A. The Council considered approval of a resolution relating to the Medical Dispatch Training Program. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that the 9-1-1 District had proposed to fund the training for the telecommunicators. Two of the City's dispatchers had already been trained. The District indicated that it would support the training costs if the cities in the District would show support for the program. Council Member Brock asked if the funding money came from the State. Svehla replied that it came from the 9-1-1 District rate structure. The following resolution was considered: Agenda No Aga*dalte City of Denton city council Minutes ^f c,7-.5- January 5, 1993 e/ Page 12 No. R93-001 A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE MEDICAL DISPATCH TRAINING PROGRAM; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motioned, Smith seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered approval of a resolution authorizing the city Manager to execute an easement to GTE Southwest, Incorporated, for the location of facilities upon city property. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that the resolution would allow GTE to located a cabinet on the northeast corner of Fire Station 14. Currently there was nothing on that part of the lot on Kings Row and the Fire Chief had no problem with the location of the cabinet. The following resolution was considered: No. R93-002 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN EASEMENT TO GTE SOUTHWEST, INCORPORATED, FOR THE LOCATION OF FACILITIES UPON CITY PROPERTY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Smith motioned, Chew seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry 'laye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered approval of a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement between the City of Denton and County of Denton for the provision of library services. City Manager Harrell stated that this was a routine agreement approved once kefore by the Council. The Commissioners Court reformatted the agreement to segregate the dollar numbers although the total dollar amount was the same. This was an annual contract with the County. The following resolution was considered: "daNo 11G~5 Agenda lfern-k oe~e__a-a- 9-3 City of Denton city council minutes January 5, 1993 l1 Page 13 i No. R93-003 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE Alt AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND COUNTY OF DENTON FOR THE PROVISION OF LIBRARY SERVICES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Smith seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council considered approval of a resolution consenting to the exercise of the power of eminent domain by the Upper Trinity Regional Water District for the regional treated water transmission line from Denton to old Alton. Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that the city had a contract with the UTRWD to sell wholesale water. The delivery point for that water was IH35 and Lillian Miller Parkway. 1 The District would need to run a 21 inch pipeline from that location down Lillian Miller, Hwy. 2181 and then to Old Alton. Part of the original agreement from the Legislature was that the UTRWD could not condemn any right-of-way without city permission to do so. This resolution would grant the UTRWD the right of eminent domain if necessary. Mayor Pro Ten Hopkins asked if this resolution in no way incurred liability on the part of the City. Nelson replied no that it was a similar agreement to one the City had for a natural gas line easement. Mayor Pro Ten Hopkins stated that this then would just be an easement. Nelson replied yes. Mayor Pro Tern Hopkins stated that the UTRWD would riot be working on City streets. Nelson replied that they would be off of the street and would be securing right-of-way separate froc, t,`- City's right-of-way. Mayor Pro Ten Hopkins stated that the UTRWD would have to pay all of the costs. Nelson replied yes that the City did not have any liability. Agenda No -JIZ-zZQ.r- ABendaltem .E~.S,,#.Z Date City of Denton City Council Minutes /z/ Jr January 5, 1993 G Page 14 Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins stated that the City would not be fronting any money for the District on any condemnation they might have to deal with. Nelson replied correct. Council Member Perry asked if this system would become part of the City's distribution system in the future. Nelson replied yes that the City was working on a participation agreement for a part of that pipeline and the City would have the right to buy out part of that line from the intersection of IH35 to just past Ryan Road if it were not needed by the District in the future. City Attorney Drayovitch stated that as the City would be owning and using a part of the line that the City would be paying part of the condemnation proceedings for the proportionate share of the line. Nelson replied correct that the part of the line which the City would be participating in, whatever was the City's volume share of that pipeline as compared to the District's volume share, the city would pay that proportionate share of the pipeline. The following resolution was considered: No. R93-004 A RESOLUTION CONSENTING TO THE EXERCISE OF THE POWER OF EMINENT DOMOIN BY THE UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE REGIONAL TREATED WATER TRANSMISSION LINE FROM DENTON TO OLD ALTON, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Chew seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brock Faye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye's, and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried , unanimously. E. The Council considered approval of a resolution declaring the City of Denton's disapproval of the proposed change in the Denton/Tarrant County boundary line. 'r City Manager Harrell stated that this resolution was at request of the Denton County Commissioners Court. It would formally put the Council on record for support of the Commissioners' stand to oppose Tarrant County's proposal to move boundary lines. I I Agenda No __~-3_~DD ~ kgondalteo~J ~Z _ City of Denton City Council Minutes January 5, 1993 Page 15 Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins stated that she felt strongly about the resolution and that the Council should endorse the resolution. The following resolution was considered: No. R93-005 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS DECLARING THE CITY OF DENTON'S DISAPPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED CHANGE IN THE DENTON/TARRANT COUNTY BOUNDARY LINE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motioned, Perry seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 9. The Council considered an appointment to the Library Board. Council Member Chew nominated Dorothy Minter to the Library Board. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins moved to cease the nominations. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 30. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, presented the following items: A. Denton would be the site of new movie, "A Matter of Honor" which would be filmed at North Lakes and UNT. B. There would be a presentation by the auditors at the next regular meeting of the Council. He asked the Council to bring the annual financial report which had been distributed at a previous meeting. C. The next Council meeting would be the mid-year planning review session which would start at 1:30 p.m. and adjourn at 9:00 p.m. The Council returned to the Work Session Items. work Session Item 12 - The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding amending the sign ordinance and gave staff direction. Venda No ApeoOaltem wo City of Denton City Council Minutes January 5, 1993 CI Page 16 Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, continued with proposed Amendment J9. 19. Signs on IH35 - the Planning and Zc,iing Commission recommended measuring the height of signs along IH35 from the main lanes or the ground, whichever was higher and also recommended a resolution to change Texas law to allow logo signs in IH35 right-of-way. Consensus of the Council was unanimous to direct staff to prepare an ordinance following the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning commission regarding the measurement of signs along IH35 and the preparation of a resolution to allow logo signs in IH35 right- of-way. i 010. Flags - the Planning and Zoning commission recommendation was to deny allowing more national flags. Currently a state flag and a U.S. flag were allowed, any height and any size. The current ordinance allowed for a third flag no higher than 30 feet high and than 50 suare feet in wereamade content neutral, there could tbeeanyekind ioftflag rforathe third flag. Consensus t l was unanimous to ordinance following the recommendation of tthea Planning prepare an and Zoning Commission allowing no more flags. Consensus of the Council was a majority, Council Member Chew indicating nay, to direct staff to prepare an ordinance following the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding content neutral issue for flags with no change in height or size. ,ail. sign separation the Planning and Zoning Commissicn recommended allowing a 60 foot separation rather than a 400 fool. separation between signs on one premise w,iere two or more sia!,s were allowed. Council Member Brock asked Robbins to review the circumstances under which a premise could have more than one sign. 1 Robbins replied that currently on a single street premise, the premise had to have 500 feet of frontage If a premise had more than two streets, it could also have a sign on each one of those streets. That provision would not be affected by the sign separation standard. City Attorney Drayovitch asked how many stake signs were allowed on a property. Agenda No _ 0 - 05,,._ Agendalfaet5 Y? - 9~ [tie City of Denton City Council Minutes January 5, 1993 Page 17 1 Robbins stated that it was unlimited. Mayor Castleberry stated that this provision would reduce the standard from 400 feet to 60 feet apart. Robbins replied correct for permanent ground signs. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins asked if it were only applying to a 500 foot ` front. Robbins replied that it only applied in a situation where there was 500 feet of frontage which would allow two signs. k Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins asked for the rationale for the 60 foot provision. Robbins stated that it spoke to sign clutter on a given premise. It might limit the number of signs on a given premise. Consensus of the Council was a majority, Cou,icil Member Smith indicating nay, to direct staff to prepare an ordinance following the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding r sign separation. 112. Clarification issues - the Planning and Zoning Commission had t recommended a list of clarification issues which would clarify the existing standards and procedures. Consensus of the council was unanimous to direct staff to prepare an ordinance following the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the clarifications issues. 113. Recommendation of any other changes - Robbins asked if there was anything else the council would like included in the ordinance. Council Member Perry regarding "content stated that Hehwould llike a definition included in the ordinance. City Attorney Drayovitch stated that her staff was working on a 4 definition to be included in the ordinance. 114. Fees - the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended adding a fee or $75 for signs over 250 square feet, a $50 fee for special exception petitions, anct a $60 fee for banners put up over the r street. i panda No Agenda Item_ Nto.-_ x_23_ City of Denton City Council Minutes /Y~r January 5, 1993 Page 18 .I Consensus of the Council was unanimous to direct staff to prepare an ordinance following the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning commission regarding fees. Robbins stated that the complaints would not end regarding the sign ordinance. He felt that the complaints would be in the area of banners and the 135 sign issue and it would be difficult to do the 90 day use or lose provision. Council would receive complaints regarding those provisions. Staff would need support /direction from Council regarding enforcement. Did the Council want the ordinance enforced on something other than on a complaint only basis. Did the Council want staff to be proactive in enforcing the provision of the ordinance. For example, staff rarely received any complaints regarding banners. Should staff require the banners to comply without any kind of citizen complaint. Council Member Miller stated that currently there was an ordinance which was not being enforced regarding banners. The proposed change would be for a 30 day separation for banners. The current { ordinance regarding abandoned signs was not stringent and the proposed ordinance would be more lenient. The proposed ordinance should be proactive. When the ordinance was completed, Council must be fair to staff and follow the provisions of the ordinance. There should be reasonable but tough enforcement. Council Member Perry stated that he was also concerned with citizens as well as staff to make all comply with the provisions of I the ordinance. If the Council passed the proposed ordinance, he intended to move in the direction of enforcement. Otherwise there was not any point in having an ordinance. Council Member Chew stated that he agreed with Council Members Miller and Perry in that the ordinance should be enforced. Council Member Smith felt that the only evenhanded fair way would be to enforce the ordinance across the board and not to wait for a complaint. Council Member Brock felt that there might be some complaints in {j areas where the proposals were weakening the provisions of the J ordinance. There might be the perception that the new restrictions would be harsher when in reality the old provisions were harsher. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins stated that Council wanted to work with the City and with busin -qes and did not want to be unfair. Council gave a lot of time to the ordinance and did not do it to not have it enforced. Staff would not have to worry about the Council not supporting them with enforcement. i I I Ageriea Item- rein _.~-~~J3~ + City of Denton City Council Minutes `t z January 5, 1993 Page 19 Council considered Work Session Item #3 - The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding procedures for City of Denton elections and gave staff direction. City Manager Harrell stated that a decision needed to be made regarding the upcoming elections. The next City Council election would be held Saturday, May 1 and would involve the four single member districts as well as the at-large school district election. This would be a combined election as in the past with the City and the School Hoard appearing on the same ballot. As staff began preparing for the upcoming election, the basis of the plan was to have arrangements with the County Clerk which were similar to prior elections which involved the City Secretary as the primary individual responsible for running the election but with coordination with the County Clerk. The net effect of that allowed l the City to use County voting booths and tabulation equipment for punch card balloting. The cost to the city previously was a small materials charge and personnel costs for tabulation. The total bill was approximately $600. It had been indicated that that price would go up some this year. On that basis, a discussion was held with the County Clerk regarding an outline of a preliminary agreement which would be approved by the City Council and the Commissioners Court. Two changes contemplated in a working agreement between the County Clerk and the City Secretary included a clarification regarding the County Clerk having the responsibility and control of the tabulating room. This was a City suggestion as there was some confusion during the last election regarding who was in charge of the tabulating room. The City wanted it clearly spelled out in an agreement who would be in control of the tabulating room with City observers being authorized and provided for in the working agreement. The second change was a major desire of the County Clerk in order to provide a effective election. His strong feeling was that early voting should occur at the same site as early voting occurred for all other elections which was at the County building on Oak Street. The County Clerk would provide the facility at no cost to the City should the Council agree to the change. His rationale for the change was that in order to serve the voters best, it would be better to have consistency for early voting and there had been occasions when there was a conflict with a voter regarding early voting and that individual would end up in his office regarding eligibility to vote. The County Clerk felt that if the location were neutralized, it might minimize those kind of citizen concerns and questions. A change in location would make it easier to do City business at City Hall. All of those changes were put into a working document. However, another wrinkle had turned up in the form of a possible special election to fill the unexpired term of Senator Hentson. The speculation was that the election would be held May 1, 1993. Aonda NO AgendaItem_ 'S cote_ ~ All of Denton City Council Minutes January 5, 1993 Page 20 This additional election complicated the matter. Option one would be to continue the traditional relationship with the County Clerk whereby the City would run the election and the County would count the ballots and would mirror the agreement. Problems associated with that option included that if the special election were held on May 1, a major delay would probably occur in releasing the totals in the City election. The County Clerk would do the County election first and then tabulate the City results. This would ` probably result in very late results. A way around that would be to have a common ballot which the County Clerk would be willing to do. A problem with that would be that as the City's election dealt with single member districts, the County would have different precincts from City district lines and in some cases voters would have to go to different polling places which might cause more confusion for voters. The County Clerk had stated that he could deal with that problem. Staff felt if the City continued with the County Clerk, it would be better to count ballots after the County and leave the voting the current places. Advantages with this option were that the system wa: familiar, the cost was reasonable, it utilized modern voting equipment, and the City would be working with people knowledgeable about elections. The second option would be to use paper ballots. Some lerge cities still use paper ballots but it might be perceived as a st.sp backward. It was a workable option as ballots could be counted during day so that there would be no long delay for results. Option three involved the use of an outside firm to tabulate the punch cards. The firm would bring in its own tabulating equipment, computers, and operators which were set up on site. All the necessary pre-tests were done, the results tabulated and certified. The major disadvantage of this option was that it was very expensive. Current cost was approximately $600 for the County and this option could cost approximately $7500. Staff needed a decision from Council. If it decided to work out an agreement with the County Clerk and was agreeable to the change for early voting, a submission needed to be made soon to the Justice Department for preclearance on the change. If the Council wanted to work out an agreement with a private firm, that needed to be done as soon as possible as other cities in the area would be having the same problem which might result in the firms not being available. Council Member Smith asked if the City had its own voting machines. City Manager Harrell stated no that they came from the County Clerk. Council Member Smith asked if a private firm would provide that equipment along with the tabulating equipment. 40wa No Age,r~dj 1tam--/-e5 ate _a2_--~9~ City of Denton City Council Minutes -2 b January 5, 1993 Page 21 City Manager Harrell replied that if the private firm's tabulating equipment was compatible with the County's voting equipment, the County Clerk had indicated that the City could use his equipment. If the tabulating equipment was different, the voting machines would have to be rented from the firm. Council Member Smith asked where the School District stood in this matter. City Manager Harrell stated that the School District indicated that they would participate in the cost of a private firm and had a fjeling that they would rather go with the County or hire a private firm as opposed to using paper ballots. If a private firm were used, staff would suggest using a paper ballot for a runoff as the cost would be too prohibitive to use a private firm. i Council Member Brock asked who would be in charge of early voting if the draft contract were used and who would be determining who i would be eligible to vote. City Manager Harrell stated that the same procedure as before would be followed. The City would hire the election judges who would conduct the early voting. Those judges would be in residence at the County location but would not be delegated to the county Clerk. Council Member Chew indicated that he had problems with the date of the election and wondered if the date of the election could be changed. He had a problem associating with partisan elections and that was one of the problems he felt with moving the early voting from City Hall to the Oak Street location. He felt that the City could handle its own election. He had had enough partisan involvement in elections. City Manager Harrell replied that uniform election dates had been established and thus the City could not change the date of the election. Council Member Smith stated that the point council member Chew made regarding partisan politics was an excellent reason for not having a common ballot. She felt strongly that there should not be a common ballot a partisan election. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins felt that the Council might be worrying about something that might not happen. She felt paper ballots would be the worse option to do. The best option was to contact the Secretary of State and the Governor's office and indicate that it was imperative to have a date set regarding the special election. She did not feel it was good to have early voting at City Hall. nets- City of Denton City Council Minutes January 5, 1993 / Page 22 City Manager Harrell stated that if Council wanted to enter into an agreement with the County and if the arrangements were all right, staff would neud to preclear that change of early voting. If the arrangements were not satisfactory, and the Council did not want to hold early voting at Oak Street, then there might be an obstacle that the County Clerk would not tabulate the City's results. Council Member Brock asked for a clarification regarding why the County Clerk had that problem. If no one from his office would be there, why would chat eliminate problems. City Manager Harrell stated that the County Clerk felt it would take away two problems. One was the criticism he heard regarding the changes in polling places. The second concerned a few individuals who continually presented problems during the election. There would be a confrontation regarding eligibility to vote and those individuals who were not satisfied with the City Secretary's response would go to the County Clerk with a complaint. The County Clerk felt that by putting the early voting in a more neutral location those complaints might lessen. Council Member Brock felt that a response at Oak Street would not make a any difference as a response on McKinney. City Manager Harrell replied that the County Clerk very strongly felt that this was a very important point to be addressed to help him determine what involvement he wanted in our election process. If the Council wanted to hold early voting at City Hall, it might play out that he would rather not be involved in the city election. i Then the Council would either use paper ballots or contract with a private firm. Council Member Perry stated that the idea that the City would be unable to be autonomous with respect to its own election and to where its own voters and citizens went to vote and to make decisions regarding their eligibility, and do those things necessary to conduct an election was something he felt very strongly about. He felt that if the City was not able to be autonomous with respect to the city election, then alternative three was sensible. He wanted to avoid anything that would look like the City was not able to conduct its own election. It was one of the most crucial of all things that the city had responsibility for. It was one thing to cooperate with equipment and counting ballots and another thing to take over the election. He felt strongly that the city should maintain complete autonomy with respect to the election process. The confusion which might result with changing places and the impositions placed on citizens would not be acceptable. 4Q5nda No Agenda I City of Denton City Council Minutes 3 January 5, 1993 Page 23 Council Member Miller did not agree with the idea of the perception of partisan politics overlapping on early voting. There probably would be three elections on that Saturday, one for the City, one for the School District and one for the Senate. It did not make sense to hive citizens going all over the City to vote. one stop voting would make sense and if that were done, then the City must have control over the process. The election would not be turned over to County but the City should be able to coordinate with them. If, for example, a private firm were used and that firm had equipment compatible with the County'e• and then there was a problem, it could be argued forever what caused the problem. The pros and cons needed to be weighed regarding the receiving of the results for the cost involved and any potential additional controversy. It made sense to have the election at one place and negotiate with the County to have the elections at one place. One l other possibility dealt with low turnout in elections. If the voters would go to one place, there might be a positive impact to increase voter turn out for City elections. Mayor Castleberry stated that it appeared that the consensus of the Council was to not go with paper ballots. Council Member Brock indicated that one problem mentioned was a room appropriate for a for tabulating room if a commercial tabulator were used. She sujgested that perhaps the DISD would let the City use their Board Room. City Manager Harrell indicated that that was not really a problem and could be done at City Hall. The problem was the contracting with a firm that the City did not have prior dealings with. If the County Clerk tabulated the election, t sere would be a bit more assurance of quality control. Council Member Smith asked if the central election place would be only for early voting or would all voting be in a central place for May 1. City Manager Harrell stated that the County Clerk's strong feeling was for the early voting location. If the Council felt it would be better to have a common ballot and receive results earlier in evening, the County Clerk would be willing to do that which would in all likelihood increase the confusion of the voters. Council Member Perry stated that he favored holding early voting in city Hall and felt that the City could do the election job. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins stated that she would yield to the wishes, short of paper ballots, of the other single member seats as they A niJeNc J2' -G'D A~endaltem 5 # City of Denton City Council Minutes January 5, 1993 Page 24 wot d. probably be running for office again. She felt that a maj -)rity of Council wanted the County to count the votes if it could be worked out with County Clerk without having him run the other election. If not, she agreed that there might be problems but would favor a private firm. She felt that the Council wanted the County to count votes if the County Clerk would do that. If not, contract with a firm. Council Member Smith stated that she favored starting with option three - having the City hold the election, contract with a firm to tabulate the results and discuss with the DISD to share the expense. She felt that if a firm were experienced in that field, there would be no more problems than the City had experienced with the County. She was in favor of Option three. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins stated that that would be spending $3150 more than would have to be spent. Chew motioned, Smith seconded to consider option Three. On roll vote, Brock "nay", Miller "nay", Hopkins "nay", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "nay". Motion failed with a 4-3 vote. City Manager Harrell asked for a clarification. Council would like staff to go back to the County and ask for their cooperation and coordination but want to keep early voting at City Hall. The City would want the County to do the other aspects as in the past. Council Member Brock felt that giving the County the control of the tabulation room with some guidelines would be good. Thera needed to be clear guidelines who would be in the room and the situation needed to be clarified. Council Member Perry felt strongly about the early voting place. Hopkins motioned, Miller seconded to consider an amended version of option One to ask the City Manager to a!ivise the county Clerk that the City would hold early voting at City Hall and would need his assistance to count the votes and would he continue to do that with guidelines in the tabulating room. In no way would the City relinquish control of the election. On roll vote, Brock "ayell, Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "nay", chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried with a 6-1 vote. 11. The following official action was taken on Executive Session Items considered during the Work Session Executive Session: r W, -mv { Aptmda il"~ City of Denton City Council Minutes cli.6 January 5, 1993 `J Page 25 Perry motioned, Brock seconded to nominate Carolyn Bacon to the Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission. on roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Hopkins "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. { 32. New Business ! There were no items of New Business suggested by Council Members for future meetings. 13. There was no Executive Session held during the Regular Session. With no further business the meeting was adjourned 9:15 p.m. I BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS JENNIFER WALTERS CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS I I ' ACCOOOD7 I tt r 2 I i t: F CITY_ COUNCII i o,°,~ A 0% A :i :1 o . o °g d 0 0 o° e o t 0• i L l I A~b~1dl M0 7 ~ i pq ~ 5 AA DATE: February 2, 1993 30 CITY COUNCIL REPORT 7 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: DESIGNATE 915 WEST OAK AN HISTORIC LANDMARK t fiECQMENDATION: P & Z and HLC recommend approval. SUMMARY' See P & Z report, BACKGROUND: See P & Z report. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Preservation Program. I FISCAL IMPACT: Potentially, a 50% City of Denton property tax reduction for lO years on this site. Respectfully submitted: Prepared by: Llo d V. Harrell, C ty Manager &I z Frank H. obbins AICP Executive Director Planning and Development AXXCC282 6 AWda No DM P i 8 REPORT Tot Mayor and City Council Case No.t H-92-002 Meeting Dates February 2, 1993 i GENERAL INFORMATION Current Oxnert Robert and Peggy Capps 915 West Oak Denton, Texas 76201 f Requested Action3 Approve Historic Landmark (H) designation. Location and Bizet 915 West Oak. .422 acres. Surrounding Land Use and aoningt North - Single family, SF7, in the Oak Hickory Historic District. South - Single family, MF1, in the Oak Hickory Historic I District. East - Single family, MF1, in the Oak Hickory Historic District. West - Single family, MF1, in the Oak Hickory Historic District. I Denton Development Plant Low Intensity. SPECIAL INFORMATION This is not a zoning use change, therefore infrastructure will not be affected. The proposal is to designate the structure an Historic Landmark. This will enable the owner to take advantage of the City of Denton's property tax abatement ordinance for "H" designated structures. If approved, the owner may apply for a Sot tax abatement for 10 years. i I o2. { AgoretaNo. ~~3-ooS ApendaltarL~S ~3. ~9. (Case H-92-002) 3 std February 2, 1993/ Page 2 HISTORY The property was zoned SF-7 in 1969 and placed in the Oak-Hickory h Historic District in 1980. A number of nearby dwellings have { received landmark designation since the Historic Landmark Preserva- i tion and Historic Districts ordinance was passed in 1980. The Historic Landmark Commission reviewed preliminary and final landmark designation applications and recommended approval on December 14, 1992. The Planning and Zoning commission unanimously recommended approval on January 13, 1993. ANALYSIS 1 r The structure is located in the oak-Hickory Historic District and qualifies for landmark designation based on a number of necessary criteria for individual designation as established in Sec. 35-215 of the Historic Landmark Preservation and Historic Districts ordinance (see attached exhibits also submitted with the applica- tion). The criteria for approval is as follows: "(b) In making the designations as set forth in subsection (a) of this section, the City Council shall consider but shall not 1 be limited to one (1) or more of the following criteria: I (1) Character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the city, state or the United States; f (2) Recognition as a recorded state historic landmark, a ~I national historic landmark or entered into the National Register of Historic P11ces; (3) Embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type of specimen; (4) Identification as the work of an architect or master ; builder whose individual work has influenced the development of the cityl J I I I i J I i Nis -L: (Case H-92-002) 41 Q ~February 2, 1993 Page 3 1 ANALYSIS, Continued (5) Embodiment of elements of architectural design, detail, materials or craftsmanship which represent a significant architectural innovation; I (6) Relationship to other distinctive buildings, sites or areas which are eligible for preservation according to a plan based on architectural, historic or cultural motif; (7) Portrayal of the environment of a group of people in an area of history characterized by a distinctive architec- tural style; (8) Archaeological value in that it has produced or can be expected to produce data affecting theories of historic or prehistoric interest; (9) Exemplification of the cultural, economic, social, ethnic or historical heritage of the city, state or United States; (10) Location as the site of a significant historic events 1J (11) Identification with a person who significantly contrib- uted to the culture and development of the city, state or United States; (12) A building or structure that because of its location has become of value to a neighborhood, community area or the cityt (13) Value as an aspect of community sentiment or public pride." , The Capps have more than adequately documented the history and significance of the structure, particularly in reference to the work of the architect, Wiley G. Clarkson. other than ordinary maintenance and modernization of utilities, no alterations have been made to the 1926 residence. y- ~1-C 1 /Qende No Hate - e 3,... (Case H-92-002) February 2, 1993 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION The Historic Landmark Commission and P & Z unanimously recommend approval. I I ~ 1 ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition. 2. Approve petition with a:lditional conditions. 3. Deny petition. 4. Delay consideration. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map. 2. Application with exhibits. 3. HLC Minutes. 4. P & Z Minutes. AXX0027C ,S OAK-HICKORY HISTORIC DISTRICT I H I H ~ ~ V 1 II[ I I ~'~i ~ _ 11 =fl= li -=I1 V z 0 2i_ H_ N H - - I v ~ H N i ao 4 H = Historic Designation = Single Family-7 Zoning = MF-1 Zoning = 2F Zoning SITE ATTACHMENT 2 EXHIBIT "HI, LL. Identification with a person or persons who significantly ~lQ~.~2 . 3 , contributed to the culture and development of the City, State, or United States. 7 The residence at 915 West Oak was constructed in 1926 for Dr. Thomas C. and Etta Dobbins. They purchased the property in 1919 from Lou E. and C. A. Douglass. A cwo-story frame house (See attached photocopy) wad torn down in order to construct the current residence. Dr. Dobbins was born in 1878. After practicing medicine in Central Texas, ' he and his wife Etta moved to Denton. He was a respected member of I the community until his death in the 1950's. In addition to his contribution to Denton as a well-loved physician, Dr. Dobbins served on j the school board (serving as President in 1926) and was considered a civic leader. Mrs. Dobbins remained in the home at 915 West Oak until her death in 1967. Her only surviving daughter, Donita Dobbins Buckley, sold the residence in 1968, along with all the original furnishings, to Frank Mahan. After his death, Mr. Mahan's widow Johnnie Lee Mahan conveyed the residence to their daughter Dorothy Frances Williams. Mrs. Williams sold the residence to the current owners Robert E. Lee and Peggy W. Capps on May 13, 1992. While Dr. Dobbins served on the school board, he made the acquaintance of Wiley G. Clarkson, a noted Fort Worth architect. Mr. Clarkson designed Denton High School (now Calhoun Middle School) in 1924 while Dr. Dobbins was school board president. Other significant Denton structures designed by Mr. Clarkson included Robert E. Lee School (demolished by the school district), the Dayton Woman's Club Building on Oakland Street and other residences including 1835 North Locust. Mr. Clarkson made a significant impact on the architecture of Texas ' during his career. Attached are items of information regarding Mr. Clarkson's contributions (copied with permission) much of which was supplied by his daughter-in-law Anna Beth (Mrs. Wiley G. Clarkson, Jr.) Clarkson who has been most helpful in providing a wealth of information from Mr. Clarkson.'s personal files. Mrs. Williams provided the Cappses with copies of original blue prints and specification which have been most helpful in the current restoration process. AwdaNo. Agendaltek -12-; Date_ 3f EXHIBIT "H" 12. A Building or ^.tructure that because of its location has become of value to a neighborhood, community area, or the city, 915 West Oak Street is located in the area of Denton designated as the "Oak-Hickory Historic District." This unique part of the city offers a variety of architectural styles. The residence at 915 West Oak is a good example of Georgian Revival style. i I A I I ~ I i 1- `1'vl • 03'A HISTORIC LANDMARK ZONING PETITION AQvdallsm_ FINAL APPLICATION fb:, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS'=_..l' _ SITE ADDRESS: ots ve4i n,t< Strep~ { ~ent:on T Ica 7F 201 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (LOT AND BLOCK OR RTES AND BOUNDS - ATTACH Streetside Photograph EXHIBIT "A" IF NECESSARY): I ' I 1 j PRESEtff USE, IF NOT SAID - RELATIONSHIP OF APPLICANT T MW OWNER: + I ZONING: rya . ; ,1 ,■~~i+`?` r. I ai (Also complete Exhibit "B") NAM OF OWNER(S) ADDRESS N TMERHfi UI~lBER I~ Rnhn.r C r__s~f ~rn• r rt d 84Y ! i r r ring qt S L RI 7-1A2-jnAn4 I I I !lSlk/3 i 1 M ApendaNo CONSTRUCTION/DESCRIPTION: Awdalta~t. 1) DATE(S) OF HISTORICAL OCCURRENCE, CONSTRUCTION OF FEATURE, DaPt INSf'."" TUTION OR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE: Constructed in 1926 2) DEMONSTRATE THE IMPORTANCE OF 71M EVENT, FEATURE, PERSON OR INSTITUTION. DETAILED EXPLANATION OF WHY THIS SITE MARKER WILL BE OF IMPORTANCE TO THE ENTIRE COMMMITY. (complete Exhibit "A") 3) DOCUMENTATION USED TO VERIFY ABOVE. ATTACH COPIES FOR PERMANENT FILES. (NEWSPAPERS, GOVEIiNfX RECORDS, HISTORY BOOKS, PH('TOGRAPHS, etc.) Label as Exhibit "B": National Register? Recorded Texas Landmark? Local surveys or recognition? cap Fwh01f R I 4) ARCHITECT: __yilpg r.- Nariann S) BUILDER: irnt,,,n,.,n 6) EXTERIOR MATERIAL: Gedunnd 7) ROOFING: Cmmpnair{nn enr{a{nnlly unnd chinQlpa gainrpd egpn) g DOORS: Vnnd (ping and hi Kehl WINDOWS: 9 _ nnl.1a /.~6 . unnAnn 10) PORCHES' s .rnreA rnnrr to r rrara arrnta frnnte rontral rnliimned pnr ico{ small d 11) OUTBUILDINGS; coveuerside porch gsrL& (tn h rpmnyed horAii-Lo s d atrurture)detached 12) LANDSCAPING AND FENCING: Normal r aid ntial land•raoinr: chain link fencing across backyard only 21SIk/4 E)OIIBIT "C' ApandsNa LEGAL, DESCRIPTION AOendallem__A's Dale k - FIELD NOTIS 0.122 ACRE BEING all that certain lot tract, r: parcel of land situated in the Eugene Puchalski Survey, Abstract Atual+er 996, in the City and County of Denton, Texas, being all that certain tract of land conveyed by deed from Johnnie Lee Mahan, to Dorothy Frances Williams, recorded in Volume 862, Page 40, Deed Records, Denton County, Texas, and being more particularly described as followsi BEGINNING at an iron rod found for corner in the south line of West Oak Street, a public roadway having a right-of-way of 60 feet, said point being the northwest corner of said Williams tract; TIME East, 107.5 feet with said south line of said Street to an iron rod found for corners TBENCE South, 171.0 feet to a fence corner for cornett TIME West, 107.5 feet with a fence to a point for cornea TBEMCE Morth, 171.0 feet to the PL11CS OF BEr1INNING and I containing 0.422 acre of land. 9itbmli~~ 6 «+j -jZrfjJ''!><~"1NattOskStree#+II . EXHIBIT "D" 5-~- ~~in~oa uem_. S ~ • A CHAIN OF TITLE OF SITE AND/OR_ENTFRPRISE Illy 93 Instructions: List the ownership title from the present to original owner. 1) List this information beginning with most recent. 2) Attach copies of each instrument. BOOK-DEED TYPE OF RECARDSI INSTRUMENT DATE VOLUME/PAGE AFAL PROP. NAME OF OWNFR(S) (WARRANTY DEED) NUMBER RECORDS 'I ~ Rnhart F 1-a and _Dseolr rw_ _r a - nnrnt FSAnBPa . 1LI__111 am' Warrant,- baoa Vol RAW- 1, fiino L. IVY ` 1 1. 1 Ina 1faAs ' ~YGd f Frank llnhAn Wnr?antg n.ad Thomas G nobbinaWArrantV need Vel. 17i/P. 11 -hL21'-1L'U19 W. G. EVa"S i°^d^ra P. 244 March J. 901 I. B. Walker 9t 1 2151k/6 AgoMaltem ~ ~ ~L 6 •6 f, 60 2 o w i /•3~ ~0 .p'.~.. •...,n".:• .~kla.rf+M'...:...~~w/C». 11p'wAY1L. MAST 10.7 s' 10\ T Qo\ CONC A6c Z- I f W > G r ' eo,.e r 0 vo tc,. ` J' 41 41 ti o j.~ Q. STY FRAH£ F£s +I ~I 01.1 PI[Q 1 BEAN a O J1 3 'v. sr•-'\'s~Iw' ~ 11 2.f .nF ~I~l~ w iwnrl~. . - tir. ~ \r- } JOHNNIE LEE MAuAV O it TO „ GOQOTL•1J FPANC(S w1LL/AHg ~/A~. B62 FCr, 40 D, 2 O T 1 r 1 S Doe, PFN A4PAAHL f R E fa, S' FC. CC IradS7 ~0 7 5' EUGENE PUCHAL SKI SURVEY A-996 t.,}{1Fn f Iris tr»ct trns~ Lttach it 1 0 1 st four i.1} Jill0 r~gra;III s of the Iltst•)rr~-31 ttt k e r dI(CCtlurl ~Nu rth, bast, South, West!. Atl ph~tns shall larKcr.l z , r . , .rte . a j t ~='U6LC ~ ti ,`r c--- O 2ISIk/ 1 • ~4ti1 Y 1 +n • 11111111111 11 i i East Side cl hnicse L LILL LL E+0II8IT "H" ACendaNo 9 -005 Agenda ltem « Criteria to be, used in Historical Landmark Designation let$ The petitioner will be responsible for furnishing data to the Plarning and lJ Development Department for submittal to the Landmark Commission substantiating that the property meets at least one or more of the following l3 criterion for Historic Landmark designation: 1. Character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the City of Denton, State of Texas, or the United States. 2. Recognition as a recorded Texas historic landmark, a nationtl landmark, or tittered into the National Register of Historic Places. 3. Embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type or specimen. x 4. Identification as the work of an architect ur master builder whose individual work has influenced the development of the city. 5. Embodiment of elements of architectural design, detail, materials or craftsmanship which represent a significant architectural innovation. 6. Relationship to other distinctive buildings, sites or areas which are eligible for preservation according to a plan based on architectural, historic or cultural motif. 7. Portrayal of the environment of a group of people in an area of history characterized by a distinctive architectural style. 8. Archaeological value in that it has produced or can be expected to produce data affecting theories of historic or prehistoric interest. 9. Exemplification of the cultural, economic, social, ethnic or historical heritage of the City, State or United States. 10. Location as the site of a significant historic event. x It. Identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the City, State or United States. x 12. A building or structure that because of its location has become of value to a neighborhood, community area, or the city. 13. Value as an aspect of community sentiment or public pride. (See attached notes) 215100 /G. Agenda No QC i2: EXHIBIT "H" J # 11. Identification with a person or y,,sons who significantly oatB__ contributed to the culture and development of the City, State, or 7 United States. The residence at 915 West Oak was constructed in 1926 for Dr. 'T'homas C. and Etta Dobbins. They purchased the property in 1919 from Lou E. and G. A. Douglass. A two-story frame house (See attached photocopy) was torn down in order to construct the current residence. Dr. Dobbins was born In 1878. After practicing medicine in Central Texas, he and his wife `.ta moved to Denton. He was a respected member of the community until his death in the 1350's. Ir, additi;n to his contribution to Denton as a well-loved physician, Dr. Dobbins served on the school board (serving as President in 1924) and was considered a civic leader. i I ~ I Mrs. Dobbins remained in the home at 915 West Oak until her death in 1967. Her only surviving daughter, Donita Dobbins Buckley, sold the residence in 1968, along with all the original furnishings, to Frank Mahan. After his death, Mr. Mahan's widow Johnnie Lee Mahan con ;eyed the residence to their daughter Dorothy Frances Williams. Mrs, Williams sold the residence to the current owners Robert E. Lee and Peggy W. Capps on May 13, 1992. Wh.le Dr. Dobbins served on the school board, he made the acquaintance of Wiley G. Clarkson, a noted Fort Worth architect. Mr. Clarkson designed Denton High School (now Calhoun Middle School) in 1924 while Dr. Dobbins was school board president. Other significant Dentcn structures designed by Mr. Clarkson included Robert E. Lee School (demolished by the school disirict), the Denton Woman's Club Building on Oakland Street and other residences including 1835 North Locust. Mr. Clarkson made a significant impact on the architecture of Texas during his career. Attached are items of information regarding Mr. Clarkson's contributions (copied with permission) much of which was supplied by his daughter-in-law Anna Beth (Mrs. Wiley G. Clarkson, Jr.) Clarkson who has been most helpful in providing a wealth of information from Mr. Clarkson's personal files. Mrs. Williams provided the Cappses with copies of original blue prints and specification which have been most helpful in the current restoration process. Agenda No.~ fkttB 9f EXHIBIT 12. A building or structure that because of its location has become of value to a neighborhood, community area, or the city, 915 West Oak Street is located in the area of Denton designated as the "Oak-Hickory Historic District." This unique part of the city / offers a variaty of architectural styles. The residence at 915 West Oak is a good example of Grorgian Revival style. ~0~ AWN No 1 ~ ~ J ,i 'rte r2_.. . t 4 ~ ,M 1 ~ I eel- 00 r? J7r0vi~t4G~ 1 I r.. i ~ _ i (c c c " c I 1 w I 1 ~ .1 Y/ i. Ms. i r l 1. C~/ C. ~;'a i ~t ~ ~ i y~ 1 1 I 1 I~ ~'I ti h I C 4 v A I ~ ~ F.. C O C N.' 61 N.~ ~ ~1 Y Ir C V J 1' N , I C I ~ ti f, ro 9ti West Oak, Menton, 'Pexas wwo, s) ~ U v a EXHIBIT "I" i/We, the undersigned, owner(s) of, or party(s) with financial igmrest in,? -a Q 3 all property herein described, do hereby file this, my/our petition, asking that the said property be designated as a historic landmark under the provisions of Ordinance 180-30 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas. I/We herewith tender the filing fee of sixty-five dollars ($6S.00). I/We authorize the City of Denton to lace a sign or signs on the above property for public notification of the proposed historic desiwtion. Name Address c Jf LY~1Oa~' a City e N o n State /h -70/ Phone ~j g Submitted this _ I day of c. _ Z~•, 194 COWENTS FROM LEGAL DEPARTMENT: 0144WtS FROM FRANK H. ROBBINS: 1151k/11 ~a 1 'N I OAK-HICKORY HISTORIC DISTRICT DENTON , TEXAS 1:•• • MOIIIN "I VX ~ ~ ' .'JL . ~ •r;Y;Y ' .;t ~ ,'/,'f,~' ; ,•~•::.:iii: ~i • ~ ' T] c i 'I : ♦ `mow J::: ••~:~i ;4; ~I Y 'A .•I. [Qr 41 ~ ~Y•, M.'.'., ~ :.'.r:~.;.' V 'O.:* r' ~ •....i :f i:. i i•: i i •J • ~ Y'~ ' i'iYl'• r • r : f•r PEARL-- lo • b *-1112 :i .~1 / 1 r 1 . 1 1 1 ' 1:5 IIf, r ;v q~ 'AL r-' ,r a MLEdT OAK ;:.~r+;n;• I 1 - .WEST HICKORY_ ~f 11 ;att. _ - - - - • ~ .;r;r..r ^;:t .i•, ;r; - - i ::A:;:: I : i• ::S.. I J I I 1 F •1,1C~ . < 1~ fl REALTOR fool I I ' 1 Y s J t, 1 ' t;~ a i 915 We OAK rkuription, 4--a Crry~Mnpuo _ Uen[on - 247.X Area: 30 - Schools _1)enton [ b D.-FavzrJr/G~lhoun/Evan !fi h School _ -il)7 X 170 --8RI1 27 X--.-----------------------14 Lot Size LR 27 \ 17 BRI2 GreNec - - - -16 X 12-_--- - - Heat Space Ifeaters-- DR 16 X 14 - - - - _ _ -------------_BRI7 ,16 X 13 Units KR 4 X 11 -------Ain WlnPd.6B Br1 7 BRI4 l5 X 9 - - B- Foundation 10 X ' - - - - - Den - - IS Roof. Come . 19 k 1 l . rudo Fence _-W3.o~d _ _ lhility. - Extenorr Wood--rCome dher. Owego i car detached - - - A - RemarYa. _ furn of Century 1 story-home located in historical district. Sunnv- - -morn ajrooms off bo _ th living room and master. Beautiful ar-dwood - tl ors_ ceilit~ fans, attic-fnas, extra insulatfon added, urge---- - - _--treed lot, great curb apreal;___-___-- FINANCING • SUBJECT TO CONFIRMATION BY MORT(L{OEE ALL MEASUREMENTSAPPROXIMAIE fst Mortgage Holder. TYOe - Unpaid B•I. Irderest Rata _ Y•an. . _ - Dated. lot.-----QlaYl. TN 18.1-.-_Adddran-_- F.uMonftj pyml. Texas ----Other fin inlo Special Condrtiuna Shown by app) intment only ---------sac 3T---_.---------- owner won an Dorothy Williams Re, 1 387-4004 EBBY HALLIDAY, REALTORS 65 Oft. Phone 81 4,)!"T- 22t9 S. Loop 288, Suite 215 - Denton, TX 76205 Metro: 565-0065 Usti Agent: S,1Rtlt/tllri Res. Phone _(81_566-243J der mn,~r•,r„nuneJ hno-n rw ~nnN\'M n~ai~iht'rn ~l n~,riw.eJp Mrnr.h~err'n renM1ui.,r. Aihr Fur~n.w~rnJ,Pr.~,,,.,hr, n ,+d~nlv~ nr.mm hneq nlr uV'rieon„~,~!.r w~rnnmr'•..v, ..n ww..bn,r :q Vr gPnvuear,"nJ nP n'n~~~'mr.f la n~~' n~~nJ,me•~,h ~helw 'br p..nr r,i ~6~Nr'mv'rnlea rnn a L. vnrl, nr'.n.rl w.Jn At" a~~sfP~YV rt:fY1lT~t 1 AWds No Agenda Item _ C~~ `~f Date- Wiley Gulick Clarkson, ALA ,ley Gulick Clarkson, who headed one of the in the early 1940s, Clarkson was associated with C+vo large architectural firms practicing in Fort the arch tecturai firms of Pelich, Geren, and Rady in Worth during the 1920s and 19305, was bom projects for the US Housing Authority and US, On November 28, 1885, in Corsicana, Texas, After Army Corp, )f Engineers, Work a; rplc•.d in Texas attending the Unversp of Texas for two years, he for the government included the Liberator Village, studied engineering at Chicago's Armour Institute of Fort Worth; Army Air Force Station. Childress; Mc. Technology and enrolled at the School of the Art In Closkey Ar iy Hospital, Temple; Harmon Army Hos- stitute of Chicago for training in architecture. Return- p tat, Longview: and military housing at McGregor. mg to Corsicana in 1908, Clarkson practiced archi- One of Clarkson's last projects. in association with A tecture in his hometown for four years. In 1912 he George King, Herbert Bayer, and Gordon Chadwick, opened his own office in Fort Worth. Between 1919 was the Fort Worth Art Center (Modern Art Mu- and 1921, he was associated with A. W, Games but seum of Fort Worth, 953). resumed solo practice after Gaines's death in 1921. Clarkson was a charter member of the Texas So- Clarkson maintained his own firm from then until the ciety of Architects and served as president of that j early 1950s. body in 1942-43. He was also a charter member of Exhibiting Clarkson's strong preference for Class • the fort Worth Chapter of the American Institute cal, Gothic, Italianate, and Beaux Arts styling, his of Architects and served as its president in 1948. commissions included residences in the exclusive Wiley G, Clarkson died on May 5, 1952. Ryan Place and Rivercrest areas of Fort Worth, the Texas Chnstan University Library (1925-27), Trinity Episcopal Church (1925-27), Sanger Brothers De- partment Store (1425-27} Young Men's Chnstan AssociabonBuilding (1925-27} Woolwor.' Building (1925-27} First Methodist Church (1929} W, 1. Cook Memorial Children's Hospital (1930}, and Meth- od st (Harris) Hospital (1930). He also desired the Sinclair Building (1929), a spectacular example of a Zigzag Modeme Skyscraper, as well as the majority of Fort Worth's later Art Deco projects, including {~L n^r the Masonic Temple (1930- Collins Art Com- pany(1932} United States Courthouse (associate ar• + 11 L K ~ ` J\ chrtect to Paul Cret, 19331 Municipal Airport Ad- ministration Buckling (1936} North Side Senior High School (1937} McCrory Store remcide!ing (1937} W. C, Stripling Department Store (1937} Tarrant County Budding and Loan Association (1934 and the Crty-Canty (John Peter Smith) Hospital (1938- 39} Clarkson also completed McLean Junior High School (cngnal building, 1935} an addition to the Denver Ave" Elementary School (1935), and an addition to the D. McRae Elementary School (1936). He was des grated chef architect to design and build, together with fve other architects, Fort Worth's two federal housing projects (1938-39} i~ ru,~ n. ~ 9 ' s r: a f I I i y Y lv'~LF.Y G, ('r.AW.w„;~~~5 Ip~,• P. :•'de,i by Mrs, A -IIIhotti (WE1ev rya nwwt Ai. Rrea i Ministers Ask t. Heart Attack ~ rltrp Fi' A 1 erml $aft oeikisu fit State to Spare Is Fatal to r«divt Eu 04 Foorrtm r ; filed in U. S. District Coax Child Attacker . W. G. Clarkson Monday 1w Elmer L. Limit ` Ar eons, whose rite and i She Board of Pardons and Ps - old son mere killed in a des heard a plea in Austin Mon I W. G.. Clarkson, 88, an rcbi f Mexico higb%ay accident h feet is Fort Korth more thin 10 Y from a troop of Fort R'ort 1 r t The complaint alleges t nLetera to Commute the death yeah, died of a bean attack late sentence of Thomas Andrew He.. Monday night at his home, 1417 Worrt h poultry A ley. Egg CC: the same time Hill Cleat. crashed into the rear of who o v as sentenced , Haley, 2 He hall suffered several ruild ball's automobile. seven tun here for raping death by y attacks recently and had been east of Lordiburg. N M old Fit] received a a 4 custam rtsry treated at his home by a pby.i S, Highway 80, killing ;sit o ! I 3o-dn stay of execution from m sician. and son, Rosa; Goierror Shivers Born Nov. 28, 1885, at Corsi. Kimball's car bad been i The stay rooted Haley's date cans, Clarkson attended public losion with another car, th, with the electric chair to July schools there and later attended plaint gild, and the plaints; lo. the University of Texas. He also odministeridp firsI aid to h: Institute I The ministers told the board ofuTechn logy at h sago and the Haley had been converted since R• G. CLAARSON. • Art Institute at Chicago Christian " The conversion ca Youth Dies in Utah Flt arrest and is now a real Clarkson 11 a former president SALT LAKE CITY, ;day Christian of e Texas Society of Arch;- I Utah's weekeld floods cl before his comictiot and was not ;North Side Wins th sects and a member of American an attempt to escape punishment Ilmstitute of Architects. He also Itheir fast day, a teen geayouth wh, victim tbeyuressed. -Drill Competition~Was a member of Fort Wort, pled into th!'swnlled In the group were Robert Mel• Club, River Crest Country Club, Alver, The Ogden and its ton, Robert Startup, Estes Pir- North Side High School's ROTC Sons of American Revolution, stream Id kl nrrtbera Utah . c. Jess Kidd mad Ted Page, drill platoon iron the first round Fort Wortb Rotary Club and Weber-were the danger students at Southwestern Baptist Monday in competition for the Beta Theta Pi and w'u a Masod in [flab's worst flood eras] • Theological Seminary. 0 D, Wyatt Jr. Memorial Allard. add a Shriner. The contest was h0 at La. Clarkson was o vice president Grave Field, L'm~9 from Amoo-1 of Oil City lend Works and was Water Slops Carlsen- Carter Riverside and Polytechnic i a dtreclor of Tarrant County ~y also participated Building and Load Assoclation But It's Rain, Not Sea Arlingtod Heights, Technical Survivors are big wile; a sod, and Paschal platoons will Com. Wp• G. Clarkson Jr., add two I LE HARVE, France, may S PPetc at 7:15 m. Wednesday at ppandchildrell, W. G, Clarkson (Reuter's'-Cape Kurt Carlser, L Grave Field. The winner will RI end Clay Ring Clarkson, d] now of the Flying Enterprise 11, meet North Side. Fort Worth, and three dater; Wit raided in here Monday. He Final competition between the Mn Faille Evans of Dallas, kfn had to postpone departure for 24 winners is scheduled on Armed H. C. Nichols of Corsicana and Noun when lorrt••ul nix forced Forces Day, May 17, Airs. H. S. Woods of Kansas City. him to Close the holds from which The Wyatt trophy is furnished • Funeral arndgemeeti will be Coal was being unloaded. by the 145th Armored Infantry mbsounced by Gause-ware !v, Colleen has received more that j Battalion, Texas National Gilded, decd Jfcme. 100 letters from French admirers , +'nee Jill arneml here but an. IZiOn Stale wuhia state, +6s M0:8 Cash lea Listed aslered only one It came from f Jeari-Alare Lefebvre, JERCSALEM May 14, who _ S fReu• A'A0 •,GTON, May S ('Po_ t wrote °I don't expect to meet I'BenGurioe IMonday [introduced dentifiedos65 additionxi badttle man like you but I am going a bilt !n Parliament Iranting the'usualties dawn to lock at your ship ld the 1 World Zionist movement the port that lu harbor in Korea in a new re status of st red eight killed. S3 ate within a uua" wounded and four ht missing ` II ` NOW , , ,for you who went the finest! {r 1 Stripling's brings you r 004~ 0, 00, R'a ni s li t tle Pr, w.•r 1. t..a rI P Pew w"e Erosty-tonerr I,M r- II ~iyi ' 111/ I 1 41%&x"" a" i i supereale Sheets . Acepda No Sts*•Tc'-a..,, Agenda item, ? I ar, son urzer _ III Be Held Wednesday i W. G. Clarkson,.pp, Fort worth ' and C. C. Autry, both of Boyd, tpct for morCthao 10 years, and R, L. Autry of AUanll, Ga.; ' buried in Creen+rood air, one utters, Mrs. Bessie Sum. 1 t ce"ral services at 4 p, an. here of Ly~bbad, -M. M.;, three r _ Ned. I y in First Methodist brothers, - M. Eggleston of Court Fort Worth, R. Eggleitoa of p,., r Rey. E. B. Hawks and Dr-se o33, CarIsbad4hd E. E, lestao of :a oq Fmte' will conduct the rv• Loving, N. M.; 12 gran bUdren cPas. and one trot-grandchild Clarkson died late Monday M ght of a resit sit' at his Funer r-gr2 will he tread 'home, 141.7 Hill Cres t . GEORGE at 4 m. We day at' He had suffered several mild at E Isco a St. An. attacks recmUy and had been I D D 1%~h"'b for treated at his home by a ph). j of M.'A l,, !6Q, Leoersl Man- mld in Corsicans, Clarkson hrre~am'ce 1978 H'. G. CLARXSON. d public ecbools ther +na Akr the UNversLy of Tea• Be also studied it the Ar• Pour Institute of Technology In S Clafeago sod the Art listitute( T f•~,~'•'' sere r,Sigre he began his weer as an,outslandin{{ architrcNrd de. ,elgnar here, Clarkson's works in. Nude First ldethodi;l church, uoale Temple, Cook Memorial y t ayltal, the Methodist Hospita4 } 4h4 U. S. Courthouse and the -2 H! was a former resident of ! Texas Society of Arthitecta d a ""!mbar of American luu. of Aredlta W fie also ru • W of the Fart W ortb Club; 1 1 >7 FTO-teldt Country Club, Soia v 46 Amuicsn Revoluton. Fart ~Mraxth L He and SeEL ~7RN PL He was a a Shriner.. fs, C Wrksoi was it vice pmideof 40 dty Iron Works and srL :devalue 'of T'smat Co*ty,' s,•• dlcg and loss Aasseliid Ifrt darisoi L be f J he Lie Johoaou Ce@ k Ord Jester ~l I ►re e d. o . a8. kienda No `Z~ IN MEMORIAM The Board of Directors of Tarrant Couny wilding J 3S an4 Loan Association at its meeting on Thursday, May 8, 1952, having learned with deep sorrow of the death of Kiley 0. Clarkson, a beloved member of this Board, do now adopt the following memorial: Wiley 0. Clarkson, the fine gentleman, the Cor- iving friend, one whose charity of heart made him an .xemplary figure in the life and civic progress of this community, has crossed the bridge of Time and is now, as we hope, in that realm where the spirits of made perfect, just men are We, his associates, on this hoard rejoice in the privilege of having known him, in having observed and revered the hig}, traits of his balanced mind, and the in- tegrity which marked his relations with his fellow man. He was fabric of characters-echaracter of those elements which form the all others, that survives death in a mortal world. He captured and won recognition of his genius in the profession which he adorned and, finally, in his home life he embodied the sum of domestic virtues which held and kept the love of one woman and the respect of all others. be spread on the minutes IofRthiaVpssociation# and memorial that one copy of same be signed by the Presidenu and Vice President of the Association and by each and all members of the Board and that a copy be transmitted to the lovely wife who shared his triumphs and `Mt a copy be sent also to his son. sia of the and President and of5theeme mbbeersuofathe Boardronithis 8th days of May, 1952. President r° 6 Vice President n I: I M !1 1 it. i'$t~ID:2~T and t.'M:XS (r Td.:, PvtLT VCFTH &ACdVji CLUB. k • G. GL&HFS0,W died nay 5, 1952, of a heLLrt attack at ..is hose, 1417 Hill Great, (resident boheal appointed a oomuittee composed of three cf his personal friends to prepare a memorial rea- olatlon. It is difficult to corAanse the record of his career, to typical of &11 that is best In %aerie" citizenship, within the short space of a resolution. Wylie was born in Corsioana on bov. 20, 1885. tie was educated in the schools and University of his native State, and did graduate work at the Armour Institute of Technolo&Y and the Art Insti- tute in Chicago. Fie was a forcer president of the Texas Society of Archi- tects, at►d was a long time meager of the American Institute of Arohi- tecte, and of various Clubs and Pirst Mthodist Church. He w.,s an outstanding man IuA a noted arohiteot, By her- idity, education uwd character he was a leader In hie profession, ,mown throuthout his native State and nationally as such. He was res- pected for his ability, absolute integrity, unfalllnF iair,iees, high Ideals sad generous nature. There was a ohars about him and in his ►e.lner that made friends and bound that to his with 'hoops of steal'. a Whether in bu.slaess natters or in times of relaxation he was a gen- tlesan4 and those of us who know his loved him. Able, oapabls, ohara- Inti, ioyal, dependable, happy, handsome and genuine are only a few of the ed3*tivee that come to mind In tninking of him. He bore no m•►lioe and harboro4 no resentment afainst those who differed with his. ho was a worthy soo, devoted husbw~d and father, a use- ful oltizen, kn honorable and loLraed arahlteot, a prominent and ao- ti" member of this club and a triad " trusted friend and companion of those who came in daily contact with his. Y'euiicc~uBa, 63 IT ntZovLV3D, That in the death of k'YLLF 0. CLAH13Ji the Port Worth &change Club has Irst one of its roost enthusiastic and useful members and the profession of architects a worUty and honorable representative, ard that we extend to Ars. , Clarkson and to his son, Y. 0. Clarkson, Jr. our sinoere sympathy and appreolation of their loss, and with IMs treasure fond recol- lections of this good i:,an. V1 hay 21, 1952. Reeyc ull) submitted, I 1 A NBmtur DIRIMR• leow". v,mPXwBY, • Ageida O. BARNEV 'WE WAN[, VICt-r..AIDRAM ? BENJAMIN L. BIND ✓ 1!L ttO.ETA., ~fr > _ WUV 0. BROWN -3/ ON ON C66UNA r_~ y~ypy~,■yrJ C'/LJ1/I/ ✓.!6 B ALLEN SNOW Ev g [YAMS !Ella L, NANOIB rtYl AV 16 L NAVWAND /J 1NOYA0 N. LAW V AAA. JEROME A. MoONE J & RtMV O.LOOARTT, JR. ru n..r imp W 111 J WARE E M9VM Re IDAT 12115 P.M. }torn TEIAS FORT WORrN 1. TEiR■ May 27, 1952. xrs. 'i, 3. Clarkson, 1417 Rillcrest, Fort Wort'.: 7, Texas. Dear 1!rs. Clerksonr One by one the lights go out is our Rotary Club menbership roster of 192). Almost thirty years ago it was, vher •'ile; joined the Fort Vorth Rotary Club--a ran who brought honor and distine..oc to his clcasification in Rotaryl A:chiteeture. ,,'iley 'ran !cne much for his Roter;r C?ct in hic quiet was. Re has shown younger rea in Rotary the true ceaciriC of "Service Above Self." So it is in this mood that we write this letter of sorrow, Mrs. Clarkson, We cannot express here aLeouctely, what a lovable character your hLS- ba.-,d was. Our weekl;r mestinge, as you well know, were rrida;• noon. To these luncheons lilt, brorieht h:s warm personality, hie -''neer intereot in others, and never the cares and Zroblems from his :•..m office. He came to left up and cheer his fellow Rotmrirne. C!ten he ate nothing at all. Fie vit was lively, Me repa:A.ce instantaneous, but never barbed. We are proud to have been associated with such a man as your Wiley, kre. Clarkson. We look pit} the pride of s fellow Rotarian on the many promi- nent baildines that boa-- the wu:stakable inp.-!nt of Clarkson the A O-Itect. Sone of us knew that Wile., stuck close to '.-.is work ari guarded his professloc jealously. of is wero f:cttered in ti.avin;, a close aco,acictanceship with a ¢an haccrel by the American Inctitute of Arc;:itects all over :e=. !:cw we :CZli2t th9t these imreccive buildir-;r, of his expre.r, t::t personality, t o activity and t:-.e living percer,tlcz. o. a great cnd good human, l soul. With decpe:t cy:nathy, M CTORS Wray D. Brown 2.;orton Gause Ware Jerome A. Score 0. 0. pa-ney W. Collins S, Allen Crowley JOE idAM • Felix L, Weis Paul S. Hayward President Thomas B. Law J. V. Sha art, Jr. Benjamin L, Bird MRMDCR ROTARY IN/TCR'IATIONAL "Service Above Self-He produ Moel Who Serree Beat" 31 I . sr X A S S O C I E T Y O F A R C H I T E C T S Ag"da No > Agenda Itom_2'' 2'~f7 The Executive Committee of the Texas Society of Architects, meeting in Dallas on 4 May, 1452, was apprised of the death of our beloved and respected colleague, Wiley G. Clarkson, and the following resolution was adopted unanimously; ; RESOLVED: First, that the Texas Society of Architects express deepest sympathies to the family of Wiley G, Clarkson in their be- i reavement on behalf of the hundreds of architects in Texas who knew and respected him; and Second, that the Socie•. maze a matter of official record its apprecistl~ln of Mr. C.arkson's unusual talent and abilities to produce l,eautiful and useful structures, remarkable for the soundness and practicability of their construction, and Third, that we record the Society's gratitude for his inumerable contributions, tangible and intangible, to the profession and to the formation and promotion of the Texas Society of Architects, and for the conduct of his work on the highest plane of ethical standards as an outstanding example to all practicing architects, Herbert M. Tatum, President J a c kC an, Sec ry HlAalar ML TATUM, /rblbel MII hbweel Ikea 00"on. tenet Atelar L 00lIMON, VW /ruuenl III w«aew Irreef Novi ?*A. lox dj JACK M, C010AN, Men4+/ Tree,erer 107 Mellr 10H lea J Delius, Teu, 3Z, Historic Landmark Commission Minutes of December 14, 1W2 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 2of4 EU AFT 9LIZ, 5 aGenda Iterrt- •c 2 ~ 111. Hold a public hearing and consider designating 915 W. Oak Street an Historic Landmark. Ms. Bites reported that she has reviewed the Historic Zoning application of Robert E. Lee and Peggy Capps for 915 W. Oak Street and made an on-site inspection of the property. The structure is located in the Oak-Hickory Historic and meets at least two of the necessary criteria for individual designation as ~I established in Sec. 35-215 of the Historic Landmark Preservation and Historic I Districts ordinance. Ms. Bites continued that the Cappses have more than adequately documented the history and significance of the structure, particularly in reference to the work of the architect, Wiley G. Clarkson. Other than ordinary maintenance and modernization of utilities, no alterations have been made to the 1926 residence. Ms. Bites concluded that the decision of the Commission would be forwarded io the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider at its meeting of January 13, 1993. Ms. Holcomb arrived at the meeting. Mrs. Capps stated that she and her husband had no knowledge of the previous owners or the architect at the time they purchased the home. Since purchasing the home, Mr. Capps researched the information and has met with the Mr. Clarkson's daughter-in-law. Annabeth Clarkson nowlives in Walnut Springs. Mrs. Capps Invited the Commission to tour the home anytime. In Favor; No one present spoke In favor of the request. Qvvzejj No one present spoke In opposition of the request. Ms. Abbott closed the public hearing. Recommendati n- Ms. Bites stated that staff recommended approval of the request. Decision, Mr. Barker moved to recommend approval for designating 913 W, Oak Street a Iistoric Landmark. It was seconded by Mr, Bailey and unanimously carried (7.0). ,33 AllendeNa ___~13 X05 Agenda ltenL Attachment 4 tbte._~~.-<~ _L= P&Z Minutes ✓y January 13, 1993 ` Page 3 building. Mr. Robbins said yes. r Ms. Flemming asked about the curb cuts for the Elm-University Addition, Mr. Yost pointed out their location using the overhead projector. He said that the curb cut on University was granted a variance by the Traffic Safety Commission. Motion to approve the consent agenda carried unanimously (5.0). Mr. Glasscock moved to postpone consideration of item a, the final plat of the Lakewood Addition, until the next meeting. Motion was seconded by Ms. Huey and unanimously carried (5.0). IV. Hold a oubiic hearing and consider designating 915 W. Oak Street as a histuric landmark. Mr. Robbins said that the house is currently in the historic district. The land use is not changing and the underlying zoning will remain the same. The owners will be able to apply for the 50% tax break. The Historic Landmark Commission has found that the eligibility criteria have been met. On question, Mr. Robbins explained that the tax break was initiated by the City as an Incentive to preserve historic properties. The petitioner was present but had no additional comments. No one was present to speak in favor or in opposition to the designation. RECOMMENDATION: Mr. Robbins stated that the Historic Landmark Commission recommends approval of the designation. Chaiiman Engelbrecht closed the public hearing. Mr. Willis arrived at the meeting. Mr. Cochran stated that he has had the opportunity to review most historic designation applications. Ile commended the applicants on their research Into the historic value of the structure. Ile moved to recommend approval of the designation of 915 W. Oak Street as a historic landmark. Motion was seconded by Ms. Huey and 3~ ApsadaNo _ 93'DO~ Agenda ~tatri gate _ le3 P&Z Minutes January 13, 1993 Page 4 u L nanimously carried (60). V. Hold a public hearing to consider modifying the screening requirement for.135 acres of land known as Lot 2R, Block 1, Offenbacker Addition. STAFF REPORT: Mr. Yost stated that the Commission has the authority to review modifications to the landscape requirements. A six foot screen is required between office and residential uses. The applicant is compromising with staff in order to preserve the existing shrubs. The applicant is proposing to provide the necessary screen by utilizing a combination of 2" understory trees, existing evergreen shrubs, and 5 gallon Arbor Vitae shrubs. Water will be provided by hose when necessary. The applicant also proposes to preserve an existing 14" tree by covering the root zone with permeable paving rather than concrete. There is a fence on the adjoining property to the north. The fence is in fair condition and will last 4-5 years. By then, the existing vegetation will be at least 6'. Mr. Yost stated that the purpose of the modification request is to preserve the existing vegetation. Ms. Huey asked what is special about the existing vegetation. Mr. Yost said the fact that it exists and is alive and growing. It serves to shield the property somewhat. Mr. Engelbrecht noted that the existing vegetation is obviously hardy and will survive, He asked if the Arbor Vitae is hardy. Mr. Yost said yes and that it is low maintenance. There is a hose outlet on the existing building which can be utilized to water the vegetation. If a waiver were not 1 requested, the applicant would have to provide a 6' screen. Mr. Cochran asked if the neighboring properties are owner occupied. 1 Mr. Yost replied that they are mostly rental properties. Both the owners and the renters were notified of the proposed modification. Mr. Engelbrecht asked how tall the Arbor Vitae will be in 2.3 years. Mr. Yost said that it should be about 6' in three years. Eventually it will reach 10.12 feet. It is a very dense shrub. ~5 ALL00432.WP5 Agenda No Auend~ Item Nto 3C,/- ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, DESIGNATING THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 915 WEST OAK STREET AS A HISTOR[C LANDMARK UNDER ARTICLE V OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Historic Landmark Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton have recommended that the property herein described be designated as a historic landmark in the City of Denton; NOW, THEREFORE, i I, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: i SECTION I. That the building and land located at 915 West Oak S attached treet, the land being more particularly described in Exhibit "A" hereto and incorporated herein designatedasa historic landmark under Article eVeof thesCompre- hensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. EL9210 _I. That said property herein described shall be indicated upon the zoning map of the city of Denton as a historic landmark by the letter "H", and the property herein described shall be subject to all of the terms, provisions and requirements of Article V of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas, and such designation shall be in addition to any other such designation established in the City's zoning ordinance applicable to such property. ordinance or fails Any cperson who shall omply th erewith or c with anyrofithe require- ments thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be punished within the limits above. SECTION iV. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the city of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. Aperrda No .~3___~__ 37 PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1993. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR r ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BYt APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY '.Y' L~ t c e I PAGE 2 I 37 I EXHIBIT "A" A9%daNo ~3 DDS LEC+AL DESCRIPTION I}atE___~_a ~3 PIRLD NOTRS 0.422 ACRE BEING all that certain lot tract, or parcel of land situated in the Eugene Puchalski 996, in the city Survey, Abstract Humber and County of Denton, Texas, being all I LeetHahanait,o Dorothyf Frances Williams, by redee from corded In Johnnie 862, Page 40, Deed Records, Denton Count , being more particularly described as followsr Texas, and BEGINNING at an iron rod found for corner in the south line of West Oak Street, a public roadway having a right-of-way of 60 feet, said point being the northwest corner of said Williams tracts T9ENC6 East, 107.5 feet with said south line of said Street to an Iron rod found for corner; THENCE South, 171.0 feet to a fence corner for corner TRIMC8 West, 107.5 feet with a fence to a point for corner! TBENCB North, 171,0 feet to the PI,ACR OF BBOINNINO and containing 0.422 acre of land. ~~,~~''1y►;=~Ciiowii~~1"5'"West+Oak-Sttaetr}{ , i 103 8. ~ , I ~LI 1; 'JCI s ~''It: r. ir. T j77COUNCII 1 f 1 c{ii? ~I ttz~ Ii$ I i l i ^.i GI ~ O 4 Mf L 1 O 4rOM t`4QO) COG ~0 ~yenualVo Q DOS ag en0a Item _ .5- ero__ Z 1:93 DATE: February 2, 1993/`La r; CITY CO N I.[, REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Coulicil FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUE67ECT: Sign Ordinance Amendment and Sign Fee Ordinance RECOMMENDATION. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. SLM88Y: An ordinance amends Chapter 33, Signs, of the Code of ordi- nances concerning altering non-conforming signs, abandoned signs and supporting structures, calculating sign effective area, special sign districts, monument signs, wind devices, temporary and stake signs, measuring the height of signs on I-35, flags, separation of signs on a premises, and rewords a number of provisions for legal and clarification purposes. A separate fee ordinance on your agenda establishes fees for certain signs. Another ordinance amending the zoning ordinance with respect to signs in planned development districts will be on your J February 16th agenda. BACKGROUND: Since May 19920 the Planning and Zoning commission has held seven public hearings and two separate work sessions and the City council has held one public hearing and three separate work sessions. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS ORGRQUP3 AFFECTED: Everyone who sees Denton. FISCAL IMPACTS None. AgWa No Date _2 Respectfully submitted: AoI,l 00 d V. Harrell, ity Manager Prepared by: V Ro Frank H. bbins AICP rJ Executive Director Planning and Development ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinances. AHx00211 v AgBnQaNO AAAOOFEF 1 ORDINANCE NO, 7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING THE SIGN REG- ULATIONS OF CHAPTER 33 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ADDING TERMS TO ENHANCE ENFORCEMENT OF THE ORDINANCE IN SECTIONS 33-1, 33-121, 33- 126, 33-149, AND 33-166; BY AMENDING DEFINITIONS IN SECTIONS 33-2, 33-3, 33-4 AND 33-91; BY AMENDING SECTION 33-62 REGARDING FLAGS; BY AMENDING SECTION 33-65 REGARDING WIND DEVICE SIGNS; BY AMENDING SECTION 33-95 REGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REPAIR; BY ADDING A SECTION 33-98 REGARDING NONCONFORMING SIGN PERMITS; BY ADDING A SECTION 33- 127 REGARDING CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY; BY AMENDING SECTION 33-146 REGARDING MANNER OF MEASUREMENT, AND ILLUSTRATING SIGN COPY; BY AMENDING SECTION 33-147 REGARDING ABANDONED SIGNS AND SUPPORTING STRUCTURES; BY ADDING A SECTION 33-148 REGARDING SIGN FACE STAND- ARDS; BY AMENDING SECTION 33-181 REGARDING SIGNS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS; BY AMENDING SECTION 33-182 REGARDING SIGNS IN NON- RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS AND PARTICULAR MONUMENT SIGNS; BY AMENDING SECTION 33-183 REGARDING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND SPECIAL SIGN DIS- TRICTS; BY AMENDING SECTION 33-184 REGARDING WIND DEVICES (BANNERS) AND TEMPORARY SIGNS IN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICTS; BY AMENDING SECTION 33-211 REGARDING TEMPORARY SIGNS; BY ADDING A SECTION 33- 212 REGARDING WIND DEVICE SIGNS (BANNERS) AND FLAGS; BY DELETING SECTION 33-213 REGARDING REPLACING OR ALTERING NONCONFORMING GROUND SIGNS; BY REPEALING ARTICLE VI INCLUDING SECTIONS 33-221 THROUGH 33-226 AND ADOPTING A NEW ARTICLE VI AND A SECTION 33-221 REGARDING ILLUSTRATIONS; BY AMENDING SECTION 33-253 REGARDING SIGN PLANS; BY CONSOLIDATING SECTIONS 33-254 AND 33-255 REGARDINO CREATION, REVIEW OF PLANS AND CRITERIA FOR SIGN DISTRICTS; BY AMENDING SECTION 33- 256 REGARDING CONDITIONS IMPOSED UPON SIGN DISTRICTS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF $20000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the erection and maintenance of outdoor advertising signs, displays, and devices in areas adjacent to highways and roadways should bo regulated in order to protect the public invest- ment in such highways, to promote the recreational value of public travel, to increase public safety by limiting distr,ictions to the driving public, to preserve natural beauty and to promote the reasonable, orderly and effective display of such signs, displays and devices; and ` WHEREAS, outdoor advertising is a legitimate, commercial use of private property adjacent to roads and highways; that outdoor advertising is an integral part of the business and marketing function, and an established segment of the national economy which serves to promote and protect private investments in commerce and industry and should be allowed to operate in business areas; and that the regulatory standards set forth in this ordinance are con- sistent with customary use in this State and will properly and adequately carry out each and all of the purposes of this ord- 40ondaNa Agenda 46• inance, more severe restrictions being inconsistent with customary use and ineffective to accomplish the purposes of this ordinance; and WHEREAS, the intent is to safeguard the general welfare of the public while protecting the investment of the property owner, to preserve the beauty of the community while balancing this with growth, develoyment and commercial pursuits. In setting the stand- ards, the following findings are made: (a) That a multiplicity of signs is distracting to motorists and a hazard to vehicular and pedestrian traffic; (b) That it proliferation of off-premises commercial signs obscures the legitimate effort of local business establishments to reasonably identify the location and nature of their businesses; (c) That it is a legitimate public purpose to limit commercial signs in the City to those reasonably necessary to identify local businesses. Such limitations are established so as to: (1) Limit distraction to motorists and reduce the danger to other motorists and peOestrians. (2) Control and abate the unsightly use of buildings •~nd land and to enhance the appearan:e of the landscape. (3) Preserve the beauty of the landscape and residential and commercial architecture; and WHEREAS, the p.►anning and zoning commission has reviewed these proposed amendments to the sign ordinance on September 9, 1992, September 23, 19920 October 14, 1992, and December 16, 1992 and recommends approval of these amendments to the City Council; Now, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS? SECTION I. That Chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances relating 1 to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by revising Subsection (a) of Section 33-1 entitled ''Purpose and intent," so that hereafter same shall read as follows: eeo. 33-1. purpose and intent. (a) It is the purpose of this chapter to regulate the con- PAGE 2 ABee4a116 en.- -A L.6 struction, reconstruction, erection, installation, placement, re- location, maintenance, display, use, modification, alteration and removal of private signs within the city. SECTION II. That chapter 33 of the Code of ordinances re- lating to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by deleting from Section 33-2 entitled "Definitions," the definitions of the terms Effective Area and Stake Sign and by adding a def- inition of temporary sign and revising certain terms in said section by defining such terms set forth below to read as follows: Sec. 3--2. Definitions. Front yard means an open, inoccupied space on a lot facing a street and extending across the front of the lot between the side lot lines and from tho main building line as specified for the district in which it is located (the "building setback line"). Ground Sign means a sign, other than a wind device sign, whose principal support is provided by burying, anchoring or otherwise connecting the sign, or supporting structure thereof, to the ground and which is not a portable sign or attached sign. Monument Sian means a ground sign, other than a wind device sign, which is solid from the ground up, and is made of stone, con- crete, metal, routed wood planks or beams, brick or similar mater- ials. The pole(s) or support of this sign shall be concealed. Streets defined: Local - A street whose sole purpose is to provide access to abutting single-family or two-family residential properties. It is designed to serve no more than five thousand (5,000) vehicle trips per day. Collector - A street whose main purpose is to collect and di- rect traffic from local streets to arterial streets, to carry traffic between arterial streets or to provide access to abut- ting commercial or industrial properties or higher intensity residential land uses. It is designed to handle no more than ten thousand (10,000) vehicle trips per day. Secondary Arterial - A street whose main purpose is to serve as a major route from one (1) area of the city to another, as ' a connection between one (1) primary arterial to another or to provide a major route to one (1) or more of the city's moderate activity centers. Primary Arterial - A street, includini freeways, whose main purpose is to serve as a major route into, out of or across the city or connect one (1) or more of the city's major activ- FACE 3 J agenda No _ 99 - a~ 5 Aoenda Item ta__ .2:93 f 1- ity centers. I` + I NOPF.: Collector and arterial streets and freeways are shown on the City of Denton's Thoroughfare Plan and the Collector 1 Street Map. Temporary sign means a ground sign that is used to commur,icate or advertise a single event which has not yet occurred and which is - temporary in nature. Examples of temporary signs include, but are not limited to signs advertising grand openings, future construct- ion projects and real estate listings. I` Wall sign means any sign, other than a wind device, wholly af- fixed to, supported by or painted upon the wall of any building and which is not a projecting sign. SECTION III. That Chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances relat- e 1 ing to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by del- eting from Subsection (6) of Section 33-3, entitled "Exemptions", the term "temporary" so that hereafter this Subsection shall read as follows: See. 33-3. Exemptions. The following types of signs shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter: I (See text of (1) through (5) in existing ordinance) (6) Holiday signs: Signs containing only holiday messages and no commercial advertising. i (See text of (7) through (13) in existing ordinance) SECTION IY. That Chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances relat- ing to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby emended by adding the term display to the introduction; by deleting the last clause of the paragraph defining the term in Section 33-4, entitled "Signs ' on public property10; and by adding to and revising the definition entitled "Signs obscuring or interfering with view" so that here- after the introduction and paragraphs (8) of Section 33-4, entitled j "Prohibited signs" shall hereafter be defined and read as follows: I Sec, 33-4. Signs on public proporty. It shall be unlawful for any person to erect, install, con- struct, display, maintain, reconstruct, place, locate, relocate, or make use of any of the following signs for advertising purposes: D i AGE 4 agenda No _2,L~ , e_ AgendaIIenl__4/6_1 ` (See text of (1) through (7) in existing ordinance] (8) Signs obscuring or interfering with view. (a) Signs located or illuminated in such a manner as to obscure or otherwise interfere with the effectiveness of an official traffic sign, signal or device or so as to obstruct or interfere with the view of a driver of ap- proaching, emerging or intersecting traffic or so as to prevent any traveler on any street from obtaining a clear view of approaching vehicles for a distance of two hundred fifty (250) feet along the street; (b) A sign other than a traffic control sign or signal, in a triangle sight area at all inter- sections including that portion of public right-of-way and any corner lot within a tri- angle formed by a diagonal line extending through points on the two (2) property lines twenty-five (25) feet from the street corner intersection of the property lines or that point of the intersection of the property lines extended and intersecting the curblines. [See text of (9), (10) and (11) in existing ordinance] SECTION V. That Chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances relating to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by revising Subsections (3) and (5) of Section 33-62, entitled "Exemptions." so that hereafter this Subsection shall read as follows: Sea. 33-62. Exemptions. [See text of (1) and (2) in exist'ng ordinance] (3) Flags as specified in Section 33-212. (See text of (4) in existing ordinance] (5) Temporary signs. SECTION VI. That Chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances relat- ing to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by adding to and revising Subsection (c) of Section 33-65, entitled "Duration,l' so that hereafter same shall read as follows: see. 33-65. Duration. (See text of (a) and (b) Ln existing ordinance) PAGE 5 (c) Wind device signs A permit for wind device signs shall be valid for thirty (30) consecutive days. A permit shall not be issued for a premise unless a period of thirty (30) days has elap- sed since the expiration of a previous permit. The permit shall apply to one designated premise and authorizes the display of one or more wind device signs on -hat premise for the allowed time. No more than three (3) permits for any one premise shall be issued in any one calendar year. SECTION VII. That Chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances relat- ing to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by revis- ing Subsection (1) of Section 33-91, entitled "Definition," so that hereafter same shall read as follows: Sec. 33-91. Definition. i A sign, including its supporting structure, shall be consider- ed nonconforming when it does not conform to all or part of the provisions of this chapter applic,,ble thereto, is not a temporary j sign and: (1) Was in existence and lawfully located and used on February 17, 1993. (See text of (2) and (3) in existing ordinance] SECTION Vrrr, That Chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances relating to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by adding to and revising Subsection (a) of Section 33-95, entitled "Destruction; Repair," so that hereafter same :hall read as follows: Sec, 33-95. Destruction; Repair. II (a) Any nonconforming portable, attached, or ground sign, including its supporting structure which is destroyed, damaged, dilapidated or deteriorated, shall not be replaced, repaired, or renovated, in whole or in part, if such replacement, repair or renovation would require an expenditure of monies in excess of sixty (60) percent of the reproduction cost of a new sign, includ- ing its supporting structure, which is substantially the same or similar to the nonconforming sign destroyed, damaged, dilapidated or deteriorated, unless such alteration or repair makes the sign conforming. No person shall repair, renovate, or alter a noncon- forming sign without first receiving a sign permit. (See text of (b) and (c) in existing ordinance] relat- amended Ordinances ing to "Signs and Advertising rDe33 of vices"his Code adding PAGE 6 J I Agendallem_ & : 3 12 vAl ~f' v' a Section 33-98, entitled "Nonconforming sign permits," which shall read as follows: Sec. 33-98. Nonconforming sign permits. The building official may issue a permit to alter a noncon- forming sign if the proposed alteration would not cause the sign to rxceed the effective area, height, setback, or illumination setback of the sign existing at the time of application for the permit. SECTION to "Signs and Advertising Devices" iseheCode of reby amended nbysadding ito _X. That Chapter 33 of and revising the first sentence of Section 33-121, entitled "Notice and order," so that hereafter such sentence shall read as follows: Sec. 33-121. Notice and order.. Any sign which is erected, placed, relocated, constructed, re- constructed, altered, displayed, maintained, installed, modified or used in violation of this chapter may be removed by the building official as provided in this article. SECTION XI. That Chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances relat- ing to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by re- vising Section 33-126 entitled "Summary removal of hazardous signs," so that hereafter same shall read as follows: See. 33-126. Summary removal of hazardous signs. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the building official may summarily remove any unlawful sign which, because of its locaticn or condition, clearly constitutes an im- mediate sign, then building official shallumlke ~a rPrior to easonable removing the locate the owner of the hazardous sign or person responsible for its display, placement or maintenance to give written notice of the violation, the action necessary to correct the violation and the time period in which the correction must be made. The notice shall be delivered to the owner of the sign, the owner of the premises or the person responsible for the sign's display, placement or main- tenance, if located; otherwise, the notice shall be affixed to the sign or other prominent place on the premises likely to come to the attention of the owner of the sign or premises. Thereafter, the building official may remove the sign if no corrective action is taken in the time specified. relat- ing to Signs and Advertising Devices" isC hereby amended Ordinances adding a Subsection 33-127, entitled "Certificate of occupancy" so that hereafter same shall read as follows: PAGE 7 ay9nQa;tem_.__Lc'.5 . d_ Sec. 33-127. Certificate of occupancy. The building official shall not issue a certificate of oc- cupancy for any premises on which a sign or supporting structure does not meet the requirements of this chapter. SECTION XIII. That Chapter 33 of the Code of ordinances re- lating to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by adding to Section 33-146, entitled "Manner of measurement" a new subsection (2)b entitled "IH-35 measurement"; renumbering sub- section 2(b) entitled "Natural ground level measurement" to sub- section (2)c; and adding to and revising subsection (3) entitled "Effective area" so that hereafter this section shall read and be depicted as follows: Sec. 33-146. Manner of measurement. The measurements required for signs by this chapter shall be made using the following procedures: (See text of (1) and (2)a in existing ordinance) b. IH-35 measurement Along IH-35, the height may be measured from the principal lanes, the frontage road, or the ground, whichever allows the greater height. (See illustration 14b.) (See text of (2)c referenced as (2)b in existing ordinance] I 3. Effective area means the area enclosed by the smallest imaginary regular shape (e.g. parallel- ogram, triangle, circle, trapezoid) or combination of regular shapes that will encompass the extreme limits of the writing, representation, emblem, or other display, together with any material or color forming an integral part of the display or used to differentiate the sign from the backdrop or struct- ure against which it is placed. Effective area includes such features as decorative or ornamental elements or features borders, trims, but not in- cluding any supporting structure which is used solely for support of the sign, such as poles, columns and cable, or decorative fence, screening device or wall. (See illustration 14e.) I a. Sign copy mounted or painted on a background panel or area distinctively painted, textured or con- structed as a background for the sign copy, shall be measured as the area contained within the out PAGE 8 Agenda No. 23, ~'rL5 ~ter~ Agenda ~i a-y ..ZP side dimensions of the background panel or surface. DONNA'S SIGNS r f N b. Sign copy mounted as individual letters and/or IM t graphics against a wall, fence, screening device, awning or fascia of a building or other structure j that has not been painted, textured or otherwise altered to provide a distinctive background of the sign copy, shall be measured as the area enclosed by the smallest regular shape or combination of l shapes that will enclose all sign copy. I~ 4 y doe's gr111* / Rr I X C. Where there are a number of sign faces or more than one sign on a supporting structure. One--Area of the single face only. Two--If the interior angle between the two faces is 450 or less, the area will be the area of one face only; if the angle between the two sign faces is ' greater than 450, the sign area will be the sum of k the areas of the two faces. u' r PAGE 9 i Agenda No rl'g Agenda;tem 12.S Three or more sides--The sign area will be the sum ' of the areas of each of the faces. d. All signs on a single supporting structure shall be I measured together as though they were one (1) sign to determine the total effective area, except that signs separated by more than thirty-six (36) inches of air space at every point between the signs shall be measured separately and added together to determine the total effective area. e. Spherical, free-form, sculptural, other non-planar signs--The area enclosed by the smallest imaginary regular shape or combination of shapes which would fully contain all portions of the sign when rotated j horizontally around the sign. i Qd. F% . i t SECTION grv, That Chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances relat- ing to "signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by adding to and revising section 33-147, entitled "Abandoned signs and supporting structures" so that hereafter same shall read as follows: Sec. 33-147. Abandoned signs and supporting ntruc urea. , The owner of any premise on which there is displayed or main- tained an abandoned sign or abandoned supporting structure shall comply with the following requirements: (1) If it is an abandoned portable sign, remove or cease dis- playing the sign within thirty (30) days of the date it becomes abandoned. PAGE 10 I~ J I OndaNo CeS Aaeadaltem_ k's 3 l~ (2) If it is a ground sign that does not meet the size, height, setback and other requirements of this chapter 1 and is abandoned on or before February 17, 1993, the owner shall cease displaying the abandoned sign, remove the sign, modify or relocate the sign, or put a blank face or other bona fide message on the sign by May 18, 1993 as is necessary to comply with the requirements of this chapter. (3) If the ground sign does not meet the requirements of this chapter and is abandoned after February 17, 1993, the owner shall cease displaying the sign, remove the sign, modify or relocate the sign, or put a blank face or other bona fide message on the sign within ninety (90) days of the date it becomes abandoned, as necessary to comply with the requirements of this chapter. (4) If a supporting structure used or designed to be used j with a ground sign is abandoned on or before February 17, 1993, and the abandoned supporting structure does not comply with the size, height, and setback or ether re- quirements applicable to ground signs, the owner of the premises shall cease displaying the supporting structure, or remove, modify or relocate the structure, or put a blank face on a sign with a bona fide message on the supporting structure by May 18, 1993 as necessary to comply with this chapter, if a supporting structure that does not meet the requirements applicable to ground signs is abandoned after February 17, 1993, the owner shall cease displaying the supporting structure, or remove, modify or relocate the structure, or put a blank face or bona fide sign on the supporting structure within ninety (90) days of the date the supporting structure becomes abandoned as necessary to comply with those requirements. In determining whether the supporting structure complies with the size requirements applicable to ground signs, the effective area of the can, frame, )r similar part of the supporting structure that holds or to which the sign is attached shall be measured in the manner applicable to signs, except that all air spaces shall be counted. (5) If an abandoned supporting structure does not have a can, frame, or similar part of the supporting structure that would hold the sign or to which the sign would be attach- ed, and such a part or face or sign is placed on the sup- parting structure, the effective area of the sign or blank face placed on the supporting structure shall not exceed the requirements of this chapter. PAGE 11 AgomdaNo Aae~da~fem /ms's 10 (6) No abandoned sign or supporting structure which is alter- ed under the provisions of this section shall be made more non-conforming. t (7) Altering, putting a blank face, or putting a sign on an abandoned supporting structure which is abandoned after February 17, 1993, and which would be non-conforming, and the cost of which exceeds sixty (60) percent of the re- production cost of the existing abandoned sign or sup- porting structure shall not be permitted unless in ac- cordance with Section 33-95 (a). (8) Any abandoned sign or abandoned supporting structure displayed or maintained, or not removed, modified, or relocated in accordance with this chapter by the owner shall constitute a violation of this ordinance, and be considered an unlawful sign and may be removed by the city in accordance with the provisions applicable to the removal of unlawful signs or the owner may be prosecuted as provided under City ordinances or be enjoined from continuing such violation. (9) As used in this section, abandoned supporting structure means the poles, beams, cables, or other materials that are used or once were used to support an abandoned sign. (10) If a ground or attached sign that conforms to he reg- ulations of this chapter is abandoned, the owner shall cease displaying the sign end supporting structure or remove same so as not to be visible from any public I right-of-way, or paint out or cover the message portion of the sign, or put a blank face on the sign in accord- ance with this chapter, or place a bona fide message on the message portion so as to leave the message portion and supporting structure neat and unobtrusive in appear- ance, within ninety (90) days of the date it becomes abandoned. SECTION XV. That Chapter 33 of the Code of ordinances relat- ing to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by renum- bering Section 33-148 entitled "Clearance from electrical lines to Section 33-153 and adding a new Section 33-148 entitled "Sign face standards" which shall hereafter read as follows: Sec. 33-148. Sign face standards. Sian face standards. (1) The following shall be required for the use, disp::y, maintenance, or permitting of an alteration of any aban- doned sign or supporting structure regardless of when the PAGE 12 i AQendaNo _ 93- rs Agenda tem__ Q_ sign was abandoned: (a) Like material. Only the same or like quality material as that being replaced or that was last installed and used as a face yin or in the abandoned sign or supporting structure may be allowed as the sign face, or that part of the structure that car- ries the sign message or that is blanked. The face of the supporting structure must be one which the supporting structure is designed to support. Painting over a face is allowed to blank the sign face. Examples: Plastic face replaces missing plastic face, metal replaces metal, wood replaces wood face, etc. (b) Routed, embossed, or raised messages or sign copy must not be able to br± seen, if the face or message is blanked. I! (c) Blank faces must be of one color. I (d) Covered messages 1. Painting Abandoned signs may be painted in order to "blank" the face. However, the paint must completely cover the sign face or message portion of the structure. The covered, paint- ed over message must not show through the paint. 3 2. Covered sign faces must be of a material or substance which renders the resulting sign face completely blank, opaque, and resistant to deterioration. Bleeding or showing through of a covered message or blanked face shall constitute the displaying or maintenance of an abandoned sign in violation of this ordinance. (e) No person shall cover signs with bags of any material. (f) No permit shall be issued for which a dilapidated or deteriorated condition would not be abated. (2) Prior to any alteration of an abandoned sign or support- ing structure, a permit for such shall re required in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. SECTION XVI. That Chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances relating to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by revising section 33-149 entitled "Sign maintenance," so that PAGE 13 AgerdaNo Agen6ailem LF~~ ~3.~.. 1~1 Ile hereafter same shall read as follows: Sec. 33-149. Sign maintenance. It shall be unlawful for any person to display, erect, locate, relocate, or keep any dilapidated or deteriorated sign. SECTION Mr. That Chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances re- lating to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by revising section 33-166 entitled "Prohibited," so that hereafter same shall read as follows: i Sea. 33-156. Pzohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to display, maintain, erect, place or relocate any portable sign on any premises that is not a registered portable sign. SECTION XVII1. That Chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances relating to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by adding to and revising Subsections (1), (4)b and (4)c, of Section 33-181, entitled "Residential districts," so that hereafter such subsections shall read as follows: Sec. 33-181. Residen%ial districts. (1) Eermitted anc rohihited type. Ground, wall, wind device and temporary suns are permitted in residential dis- tricts. Roof, projecting and off-premises signs are pro- hibited in residential districts. { [See text of (2) in existing ordinance) (3) etu ks. All ground signs shall maintain a minimum setback of ten (10) feet from the curbline and any side or rear yard property line, except that any ground sign may make use of a supporting structure for a ground sign that was lawfully erected on or before February 21, 1989, without regard to the side or rear yard setbacks speci- fied in this subsection, if the sign so placed would not violate any other provision of this chapter. (See illus- tration 14a.) (4) Humber of ground signs, only one ground sign which is not a temporary sign, shall be located on any one pre- mise, except as follows: (See text of (4)a in existing ordinance) b. Any premise which has :sore than five hundred (500) feet of public street frontage on a freeway, art- PAG"_ 14 +4Wa No AgKfl a)ld0i_ _Z5L r% erial, or collector street may make use of one ad- ditional sign for each five hundred (500) feet of additional frontage or that street, or fraction thereof, if each additional sign permitted is lo- cated more than sixty (60) feet from another per- mitted ground sign on the same premise. The dis- tan;e between the signs shall be measured along the curbline, from and between the two (2) points on the curbline which are nearest the two (2) signs. C. Temporary signs. See Section 33-211. (5) Illuminated sign setbac Any ground sign over ten (10) feet in height and any wall sign over fifteen (15) feet i in height shall maintain the following setback, from any property used for a single family residence or property zoned for single family if the sign would be visible from such property: Ground or Attached Sian Setback Non-illuminated. . . . . . . . . . 100 feet Internally Illuminated . . . . . . . . 200 feet Externally Illuminated . . . . . . . . 500 feet The setback shall be measured in a straight: line from the district boundary line or residential property line to the nearest portion of the sign or its supporting struct- ure. A sign shall be considered visible from a residen- tial property or district if the sign can be seen from six (6) feet above ground level from any point on the property or within the district. T),e setback shall not apply between a sign and a single-family residence located on the same premise. SECTION XIX. That chapter 33 of the Code of ordinances relat- ing to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by adding to and revising the introduction to Section 33-182 entitled "Non- residential districts" and Subsections (1), (2)a and (4)b of Sec- tion 33-182, so that hereafter such introduction and subsections shall read as follows: Boo. 33-192. Nonresidential districts. The following regulations shall apply to signs in any zoning district designated as a P, 00 NS, GR, C, OAR, LI or HI district, as shown on the official zoning district map of the city: (1) Type. Ground, wall, roof, temporary, wind device and projecting signs are permitted in nonresidential districts. PAGE 15 dgsndeNo _ 9.~ Agenda Item_~S 'd~~v`'~ (2) Effective area and height. ' a. Ground signs shall have a maximum effective area i and maximun height based on the street frontage of the property where located, as follows: Street Maximum Maximum Monument Frontage Effective Height Sign Area Effective _ Area IH 35N, 35E, 250 sq. ft. 40 ft. 300 sq. ft. or 35W Loop 288 150 sq. ft. 30 ft. 200 esq. ft. Other primary 60 sq. ft. 20 ft.* N/A arterials All other 60 sq. ft. 6 ft. N/A streets *Except for the Central Business d!:;tricts. (See text of (2)b in existing ordinance] (3) Setbacks. Ground and projecting signs shall mainta_n a minimum setback of twenty (20) feet from the curbline of any public street and a minimum setback of ten (1C) feet from any side or rear yard property line, ex. :-It as follows: L i (See text of (3)a in existing ordinance] b. On properties fronting primary arterials, the minimum setback of twenty (20) feet for ground signs may be reduced up to a minimum of fifteen (15) feet from any curbline, if the height of the sign is no higher than the setback. (i.e., setback - 18 ft., height = 18 ft. or less.) (See illustra- tion 14a.) (4) Number. Only one (1) on-premise ground sign which is not a temporary sign shall be located on any one (1) premise except as follows: [See text of (4)a in existing ordinance] b. Any premise which has more than five hundred (500) feet of public street frontage on a freeway, arter- ial or collector street may make use of one (1) PAGE 16 f NendaIterq._! 5C 3, additional on-premise ground sign for each addi- tional five hundred (500) feet of frontage, or fraction thereof, if each additional sign permitted is located more than sixty (60) feet from another permitted ground sign on the same premise. The distance between the two (2) points on the curbline which are nearest the two (2) signs. (See Illus- tration 14c). (See text of (5)a and (5)b in existing ordinance) S, CTION XX. That Chapter 33 of the Cod6 of ordinances relat- ing to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by adding to and revising section 33-183, entitled "Planned development districts," so that hereafter same shall read as follows: Sees 33-163. Planned development districts. (a) The regulations for signs located in planner] development zoning districts shall be contained in the ordinance ur concept or detailed plan approved for the district, except that no off-pre- rises signs shall be permitted. Should the regulations for signs be omitted from an ordinance or concept or detailed plan for the district, the sign regulations that would be applicable to the most restrictive comparable zoning district classification, based upon the land uses permitted therein, as determined by the executive director of the department of planning and development, shall be applied to the district or part thereof for which the regulations were omitted. (b) Deviations from the standards in this chapter may be considered if the continuous street frontage in the planned dev- elopment district is le6s than that required for consideration of approval of a Special Sign District. (c) Deviations from the standards in this chapter may be ap- proved as long as the deviations equally meet the objectives of this chapter, such deviations are necessitated by the design of the development within the planned development district, and such dev- iations are found to meet the criteria as that for creation of a Special Sign District pursuant to Section 33-254. (d) Approval of deviations from general sign standards shall ' be supported by written findings approved by the city council or the planning and coning commission, if the planning and zoning com- mission is authorized to approve a detailed plan in accordance with Article IV of Chapter 35. SECTION XXI. That Chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances relat- ing to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by adding to and revising Subsection (1) to Section 33-184, entitled "Central PAGE 17 ~enaa No ,J3 - Agaraaiferrt___f_S ~ Date,._~Z business districts," so that hereafter such subsection shall read as follows: 8e0. 33-184. Central business districts. (1) Type. Ground, wall, roof, temporary, wind device, and projecting signs are permitted in central business dis- tricts. ~I (See text of (2) and (3) in existing ordinance] SECTION XXII, That Chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances relating to rlSigns and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by changing the title of Section 33-211 to "Temporary ground sign" and amending the text of Section 33-211 so that hereafter this section shall read as follows: section 33-211. Temporary Sign. A temporary sign shall be considered a ground sign and shall be permitted only according to the standards for ground signs except that a temporary sign not larger than thirty two (32) square feet in effective area need not be permitted if: (1) The supporting structure of this sign is not larger than one in which two perimeter dimensions are greater than four (4) inches or one in which the diameter is not greater than four (4) inches; (2) No more than one (1) off-premises sign advertising the sale or lease of one (1) piece of real property or one (1) real estate subdivision or development sign iF placed on any one (1) premise; (3) No temporary sign shall be located within any public street median or within ten (10) feet of any curbline; and (4) The temporary sign shall be removed or cease to be dis- played within ten (10) days after the event being com- municated or advertised on the sign has occurred. SECTION XXIII. That Chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances re- lating to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by adding a new Subsection (a) and revising the former introduction and subsections of Section 33-212, entitled "wind device signs," so that hereafter such section shall read as follows: Sea. 33-212. Wind device signs. (a) Wind device identification tag. The building official or PAGE 18 ~entla No _~~~,c_lr 5 Aperidallen[~.t"JS~3, his designea shall issue a regft tration tag to the wind device per- mittee. The wind device permittee shall cause the tag to be af- fixed in a conspicuous place on the permitted wind device. (b) The provisions of this chapter regulating wind device signs shall not apply to the following: {1} Texas or U. S, flags, No permit shall be required I to display one (1) U.S. or one (1) Texas flag, or both, on any one premise. If the exempted flags are displayed on flagpoles in the manner of a ground sign, the number, height, size, and spacing requirements applicable to ground signs shall not apply, but tine flags and poles shall maintain the required setbacks for ground signs. (2) Exempted flaa. on a remise no p , permit shall be required to display one (1) flag that meets the following standards: a. The exempted flag is displayed on a flagpole in the manner of a ground sign, the number and spacing requirements applicable to ground signs shall not apply, but the flag and pules shall maintain the required setbacks for ground signs. b. The exempted flag shall have a maximum effect- ive area of fifty (50) square feet and a max- I, imum height of thirty (30) feet, unless it is used on the same flagpole used to display a national or state flag. (Ord. No. 89-017, S XIV (App. B, Art. 178.6.), 2-7-89, Ord. No. 91- 048, S XXX, 4-2-91) SECTION XXIV. That Chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances re- lating to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by repealing in its entirety Section 33-213 entitled "Replacing or altering non-conforming ground signs." SECTION M. That Chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances relat- ing to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by repeal- ing Article VI entitled "Illustrations" and including Sections 33- 221 through 33-226 and adopting a new Article VI entitled "Illustrations" consisting of only Section 33-221 with Subsections 14a through 14e which shall read and be depicted as follows: r i PAGE 19 ~ I I Agantla Mo ~ 3 - ee, AgendaltegL-LCL *-5 41 Ne . ?3...._ ` ARTICLE VI. ILLUSTRATIONS. j Sao. 33-221. I Illustration 14a ~ i r 4&SETBACKi oROUNc aIaK: SION.~ MOVIFIEO f[nACK ' I I ~ MINT I1 • OACM OF CYAN PAGE 20 4+gendii No 'f1? Sa r_ Illustration 14b lJ 14b. MEASUREMENT OF HEIGHT Maximum Ifeigl I Iorizontal Line - SIGN SIGN t Vertical Line - i 1 ~ ~ I I Above Curbline i Belcw Curbline t I S1 REST CURBLINE CURBLINE 11 135 MMSUREMENT 1 4Oh I wF~ MaximuJLF-WEL- HihHorizontal Line -7 Vert ical Line G1tOUj PRINCIPAL LANES FRONTAGE ROAD r PAGE 21 I Agenda No Agenda lteM L #3. A Illustration 14c I 4o.NUMBER AND PLACEMENT PROPERTY S. GROUND SIGNS LIP 19 iNAM Ir.') + i rooArr rur Jor I PROPERTY A. life'? H $480TA61 r OR 1 NOR, 120 /OUARE PEST MAXIMUM. j 2 /FON/, 40 /OUARE IEIT EACH, MAXIMUM. YO11I THAN STRUT FROMTAO■ Illustration 14d 1 I i 14d. wN41T / 1 Y/ Q rte. \ S HAr IM/ . PAGE 22 ~~a•.^tla Pao __`I3.. -c'o r v~s~as Tllustration 14S 14WEFFECTIVE AREA EXCEPTIONS I Ii k EXCLUOL0 FROM INCLUDED IN EFFECTIVE AREA EFFECTIVE AREA UCPION XXVI. That Chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances relating to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by i adding to and revising Section 33-253, entitled "Sign plan" so that hereafter such section shall read as follows: Sees 33-253. Sign plan. The sign plan for the district shall show, in the form and manner specified by the department, the location, setback, size, dimensions, height of all signs regulated by this chapter, any other conditions, restrictions, or regulations that will apply to the district, and any other information specified by the depart- ment, the commission, or council needed to adequately evaluate the sign plan. Such information may include, but is not limited to, information concerning the items noted in Section 33-254. SECTIONXXVII. That Chapter 33 of the Code of Ordinances re- '.ating to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by con- solidating Section 33-254 entitled, "Review of plan" and Section 33-255 entitled, "Creation" and by adding to and revising such sections into a new Section 33-254 entitled, "Creation, Review of Plan, Criteria" so that hereafter such section shall read as follows: PAGE 23 f eeo. 33-254. Creation, Review of Plan, Criteria. The council may approve the creation of a sign district for any property which has more than three hundred (700) feet of con- tinuous street frontage on one (1) public street if it finds the district: (1) Provides a comprehensive plan for signs that would be clearly superior to what would be allowed without the plan; i (2) would be compatible with surrounding properties. In considering whether a district and sign plan is "compatible" and "clearly superior", the commission and council shall consider, but are not limited to consider- ing the following: (a) Scale. The relationship between and compatibility of sign scale, site scale and the scale of nearby buildings. (b) Color, The relationship between and compatibility of sig:, color to the color of nearby buildings and { landscaping: The degree to which sign colors are complimentary to I•heir surroundings. (c) Material. The materials of the signs and how they relate to their surroundings. (d) Shape. The shape and design of the signs and how they relate to their surroundings. (e) Landscaping. The relationship of signs to lani- scaped features in and outside the district. (f) Traffic Safety and Traffic Circulation. The impact of the signs on driver's view, the degree to which view obstructions are created or imrroved, avoid- ance of crnfusion with or obstruction of traffic control signs and devices, and the time it takes a motorist to read the sign. (g) Illumination,, The impact and compatibility of sign illumination within the district and in relation to neighboring properties. The avoidance of glare and light pollution. (h) Integration. How the signs in the district are integrated into a unified development concept with the topography, building design, other signs, land- scaping, traffic circulation and other development PAGE 24 features of the district and neighboring property. (3) Is not being used merely to avoid or gain a variance of the sign regulations; (4) Does not violate the spirit or intent of the sign reg- ulations; and (5) Complies with the requirements of this section. USTION XXVIII. That Chapter 33 of the Code of ordinances re- lating to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by renumbering section 33-256 entitled "Conditions imposed" so that hereafter same will be referred to as Section 33-255 and by adding to and revising new Section 33-255 so that her-after same shall read as follows: Bea. 33-255. Conditions Imposed. The Planning and Development Department and the planning and zoning commission may recommend and the city council may impose appropriate conditions concerning the placement, design or use of signs in the district in order to protect surrounding properties, the community, and comply with the intent of this chapter. MQU ON XXIX. That chapter 33 of the Code of ordinances relating to "Signs and Advertising Devices" is hereby amended by renumbering Section 33-257 entitled "Procedures" and Section 33-258 entitled "Designation on zoning map" to Sections 33-256 and 33-257 respectively. SECTION XXX. The provisions of this ordinance are separable, and the invalidity of any phrase or part of this ordinance shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remainder of the ordinance. SECTIOtr XXXI. That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $21,000. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. ,EUTION XXXII. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PAGE 25 i I 1 Agenda litm 2 .2,3 !ASSED AND APPROVED this the day of BOB CASTLERERFY, MAYOR r ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: ~!L!/Cc~'t.Cn C~ c ~1G PAGE 26 .t ~y~ ♦11 CITY lpll~~t t COUNCIL Hal !++4t t A TT{{[r 1 I I 11 all MT: V_ o O OP pf TTM lk h1 O ` O = co s a e I ~~OOQ OGO~ I XMIT: Ml =L t tt Ff RT. DATE: February 2, JARJNo Agendalte CITY COUNCIL REPORT 0818- Mayor and Members of thA City Council TO: FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY REPLAT OF LOTS 1 AND 2, INTO LOT 1R, BLOCK 1 OF THE SANTA FE ADDITION ECO NDATION: The Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval by a vote of 6-0, at its 1/27/93 meeting. SUMMARY : The 5.80 acre tract of land is located northwest of Interstate 35, northeast of the Santa Fe Railroad tracks, at the terminus of Oak Street. Currently, Lot 1 is the site of an existing distribution/ warehouse operation for the Ben E. Keith Company. Lot 2 is undeveloped. The applicant proposes to expand the building onto Lot 2, and construct a private driveway across much of what is now Lot 2. Three new 30 ft. curb cuts, as shown on the plat, are proposed. When these are opened, the two current curb cuts will be closed. The applicant intends to pave approximately 223 ft. of W. Oak Street (251 wide), between 1-35 and the R.R. property. As an option, the applicant may contribute an equivalent amount of money to the city, which has scheduled the construction of Oak St. (to Jim Christal Rd.) for late summer, 1991. A sewer line currently serving Lot 1 is proposed to be extended 1,454 ft. to serve Lot 3 when it is developed. According to regula- tions, sewerage is to be extended across the entire Lot 1R, making service available to Lot 3. However, the Development Review committee decided that this was not warranted in the current situation, using the "reasonable nexus" doctrine. Other public improvements include a fire hydrant and manhole, as shown on the replat, and approximately 1,360 ft. of sidewalk. BACKGROUND: The zoning is Light Industrial (LI) which allows the proposed use. PAGE 1 Agenda No. 3 -D D 5 Agendallm-&' I'll Date. City services and facilities, including water, sanitary sew y, electrical, and solid waste, are available or planned for. The replat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations; Chapter 34 of the Code of Ordinances. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTS ; Engineering & Transportation Department. I I~ FISCAL IMPS: See SUMMARY section. Respectfully submitted: Prepared by: r gYd~f LC y Manage Owen Yost, Planner -jr Approved: F ank H. s AICP 4tor ExecutivPlanning and Development AXX002AE PAGE 2 r AosrdaNa ATTACHMENT 1 AgendalfrL s [tie m1lor P-92.045 Santa Fe Addition 3 S NORTH C IiJL{Jl G \ ' a ❑ LE 7 SITE At 4wf i Dale: 1121/93 Scale: NONE , ICE ATTACHMENT 2 Aflendalfam~~. .8 Rile. P-92.045 Santa Fe Addition NORTH it ' 11 ` `rl\ I 1 ` o.l\ I 1 1 11 v v ~ ~ Awl ~•1 1 Q rr 1` c Oy \ lr, rw'd1 1 1 a >4. PLO S 9 O 1 9 ~ ~ \ 11 + 'ti. 4 r 1 1 \ ° elnd 1 i \ ` o 1 I `l n it u\rruwr~ul \ 1 ~ P 1\ C CiOa 4 = Preliminary Replal Date: Scale: NONE Agenda No 13 Co 5 Ag enda lterrL_i' Attachment 3 .4- <>✓3 MINUTES A Planning and Zoning Commission d`J~ J January 27, 1993 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas, was held on Wednesday, January 27, 1993, at 5:00 p.m. Present: Mike Cochran, Richard Cooper, Jim Engelbrecht, Mary Evelyn lfuey, Katie Flemming, and Melvin Willis Absent: [van Glasscock Present from Staff: Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning and Development; Jerry Clark, City Engineer; Mike Bucek, Assistant City Attorney; Owen Yost, Urban Planner; Karen Feshari, Urban Planner; Gerald Cosgrove, Water/Wastewater Engineering; and Olivia Carson, Secretary Chairman Engelbrecht called the meeting to order. 1. January 13, 1993 Minutes Ms, Huey stated that on page 7, paragraph 7 should read that the motion was made and carried to recommend that the new fee schedule be adopted. She moved to npprove the minutes of January 13, 1993, as corrected. Motion was seconded by Mr. Cochran and carried unanimously (5.0). Mr. Willis arrived at the meeting, , 11. Consent Agenda Motion was made by Ms, [luey, seconded by Mr. Cochran, and unanimously carried (6-0) to approve the consent agenda as follows: a, The preliminary replat of Lots l and 2 into [att 1R, Block 1 of the Santa Fe {I Addition. b, The final plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Love's Country Stores Addition. ~II C. The final plat of Lets 1 - 19, Block A, Lakewood Addition. +I I .s _Tll CITY. } f r COUNCIL t~ J4 t. h 4 ~ O i E ~7 XT ITIMT: AWds No 3 • oo,s Agendallem~S. yC CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 010 ~z ,2- TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager U SUBJECT: Approvel of a tax refund to Robert Croissant RECOMMENDATION: The Tax Depnrtment has mailed an Overpayment Letter and an Application for Refund to the taxpayer. All coripleted forms and necessary documenta- tion have been returned, renuesting this refund, which the Tax Technician recommends, SUMMARY: Chapter 31,11 of the Texas Pronerty Tax Code renuires the anproval of the governing body of the taxinv, unit for refunds in excess of 8 500.00, Robert Croissant has requested a refund in the amount of 8 774,95 because he overpaid his tax on account #028222, BACKGROUND: )r, ro ssant made a payment of 577405 on December 0, 1992 and a second payment of S 774,95 on January 11, IP93 resulting in nn over- payment, A tax refund is due, PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: The Tax Department and the tax account of Robert Croissant. FISCAL IMPACT: S 774,05 40,-PSPfTFULLY S 8 ITTED: rre City Manager Prepared by. J Name 17 1 c , c ne or Title Tax Technictan ' Approved: Name Hail efferson Title Tre 'rer 2633C/3 Agate No ~-OD S Stale Appil Appllcii some Refund udon 31 11. 111 (ti17} Re APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND Agenda)te+rr ~_,l % Collecting Office Name: s Collecting Tax For: 7l I axing Units) Address City. State, Zip Code - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - In order to apply for a tax refund, the following ;nrorrnation must be provided by the taxpayer, ` IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNER: Name; ~a Is 1 0i3e •5 . Address: - ~IIJ S t-M v 7)11 ,1o/. Telephone Number (4 additional information is needed IDENTIFICATION OF PROPEL l: Q Description of Property; B ocK (p~- ~L i Address or location Of Property. l b r c t, r - Account Number of Property: X1$.2 2 2 or Tax Receipt Number: INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES: Name of Taxing Unit Year for From Which Refund Which Refund Date of the Amount of Tax oRefunf d Is Requested Is Requested Tax Payment Taxes Paid Requested 1. ~y ofd a~19 ~Z ,9 9~ s ?Y.`/S 2. frY c ~ L'rt7(i ~'rot.~ 19 19 !1: S 3. _ 19 / 19 - $ $ . Taxpayer's reason for refund (attach supporting documentation): "OA Vt~L /N A -0 yta T- eP7-L1 _14 0D 7Nf TABS TkrrCF. Lie; ~~e/~,g~T ~3 Ilottl ~Pf ues, rlNC ~FuND THE 1;~1~orlynltur. °I hereby apply for the refund of the abov"escribed taxes and certify that the information I have given on this form is true and Corr ct" Signature Date of Application for Tax Refund DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND: Approval Disapproval Signature of Authorized Officer w Date , Signature of Presiding Officer(s) of Taxing Date Unit(s) for refund applications over $500 Any person who makes a false entry upon the foregoing record shall besub)eettoonedthefollowing penalties; C ImpdsOnmentol not more than 10 years nor tees than 2 years and/or a fine of nol more then $5,000 or both such fine and imprisonment: 2, confinement In Jell for alarm up to 1 year or a One not to xeeed $2,000 or both such One and Imprisonment so set forth In Section 27,10, Ponal Code. xtow4D 11 t1 i Agenda Na ' e0 5 Ageadaltem Me. a-a 3 '~AYIi~(,~~I,j,~,ll'C+F~RJI~YykA[Y:T~p(!<M.>o~[Wi~C1YiXIX''11A1St)Q.\Q11/0~,~/1.{[~llYJiM'JX..RTM1•, ROBERT S. CROISSANT, M.D. 1414 N. ELM 062.030 13602 DENTON, Tr 70201 0014;'4/1119 C. J) S 19. r" Day to the order o . _ _t;, . r:ll6w1 _ r, ',1,Cr ,,.~,_rt t•„, 14 n~'1_ .11 f1 rt B~NKp06ERT S. CROISSANT, M,D .z8.z.~_ Y-_-- 11'0 360211''4. 19147421: u'01 5008 6u' o '0000 2 2 166 17, ' G L1 ~ L.I, i ~ f r r r ~ Y 11_It''1 r r.r i .I • ' h:.. 'I j1. ~ j •-4 - i I . ~ ' ' fJ r ~'1 1rI V ~ w REPORT FIOROSDW 01/20/93 AT 21'.17 O V E R P A Y M E N T 5 PAGE 5 ACCOUNT NO. RECEIPT N0. NAME ADDRESS Am"N7 STATUS OF PAYMEN- 03245700000 92/04/06-0473 SCHULZE, JAMES A PANHANDLE ST 23. R9 OVERPAY 02039500000 93/04/06.0475 MARSHALL, SAMUEL MINOR CA 43.83 OVERPAY 09420400000 92/04/06 0476 ADAMS, JIM S BOLIVAR ST 953.11 OVERPAY 02823000000 02/04106.0477 SMITH, STERLtNO L N LOCUST ST 224.90 OVERPAY 02122700000 613/04/00-0501 BRIGOS, JENNIFERY J wESTCHES TER OR 29 89 OVERPAY 02400600000 92/04106.0553 RODEN, PEYTON F FLAN ST 35.00 OVERPAY 02781600000 92/04'06.0569 MERK1, DONALD J 6 MARK J N BELL AV 785.12 OVERPAY 02561700000 92/04/00-OFn PRIDDY. CHAS M MERCEDES RD 35 , 89 OVERPAY 03667300000 92/04/06-.6.16 BROWN, K DALE MEERCEE AD p 0 , 01 OVERPAY 1 02996300000 92/04/04.0641 HAALOS, STEVEN C SIERRA DR 35.80 OVERPAY 03134400000 91104106 0613 BROWN, N DALE E UN[VER511V D 0,01 OVERPAY 15831t00000 92/04/06 0821 HYMAN, RANDALL S 03323300000 61/04108.0825 BROWN, N DALE CROW ON ST T 35,09 OVERPAY ST 0 01 OVERPAY 02159000000 92/04/06-0827 BROWN, N DALE BBOLIVAR ERNARD St 0,01 OVERPAY 02178600000 92/04106•CS29 BROWN, N DALE 02706300000 92/04/07.0024 FELDSTEIN. JOSHUA BERNARD D S St T St 6761 O. 0811 OVERPAY 07613600000 91!04/07-0131 NORRIS, JACKIE A MD ROLLING HILLS 1,706 78 OVERPAY 02682700000 92/04/07.0192 HARGROVE, JOHN N CTUR MIMOSA DR 510,06 OVERPAY / 02261500000 92/04/07.0261 MCNARY, MITCHELL RAY ANNA S1 35.00 OVERPAY 10109400000 92104/07-0306 OESTEN4, ANDREW V W HICKORY ST 169.77 OVERPAY 11807900000 02104007.0309 MORTON, MICHAEL 0 E WINDSOR ST 387.21 OVERPAY j 02922700000 02/04/07-0352 MELTON, FRANCES COUCH LINWOOD OR 331,15 OVERPAY 1 02304500000 92/04/07-0376 LANDRY, BARRY J BERNARD St 396,99 OVERPAY 02147700000 92/04107-0376 LINDSEY. DAVID A DENTON ST 132.11 OVERPAY 11607500000 92104/07-0401 MORTON, MICHAEL G E WINDSOR ST 451.52 OVERPAY 10661300000 92/04/08.0079 Di,NIEL, JOE M JR W COLLINS ST 232.53 OVERPAY 02468400000 91/04/06-0137 SMITH MARILYN N EMERSON LN 418.78 OVERPAY 90134800000 07/04/01.0116 SACHEM E O MO 6 ASSOC 1.38 M 13 57,44 OVERPAY 02091800000 62104/08.0217 HULL 6HARLES LEE WOODHAVEN ST 2,00 OVERPAY 02340200000 92104108-OS17 CLOW W DAN S WISTERIA ST 606.35 OVERPAY 01012700000 92/04/05.0637 R BIL EA, DONALD G WOODHAVEN ST 676 21 OVERPAY _Q2.93240IlIlIl0_4i2LDlLQScQii~ R. CLED N 36.89 OVERPAY -._~_Q 0 0y~ y2/04/11•0074 CROISSANT 3'~-- hTST TT 774,9} OVERPAY -0 76d ~600-~'f7377TF~aaUT--Rx Trft A------ '3H1 •T-'6Vrxrx9--i'-• 67166400000 93/04/12.0014 IDOM, TROY T[ASLEY 1170 l 36.69 OVERPAY 03385100000 92/04/11.0017 CHURCH, WELDON WITHERS ST 35.90 OVERPAY 18404900000 02/04/12.0010 PANCER, JIMMY COTTONWOOD 16.88 OVERPAY 10424600000 92/04/72-0021 CORPLE, GEORGE E E7UA NORFH LAKE TR 35.89 OVERPAY 03237300000 92/04/12.0024 WOLF, LEONARD MARTIN BLUEBIRD CA 35.89 OVERPAY 02813000000 92104/12.0027 SLADE, TOM 8 STONEGATE OR 35.90 OVERPAY 02800100000 92/04/12.0029 IAMB, KELLEY E WOOOBROOK '1 35.90 OVERPAY 10315300000 92104/12.003} III N0 JAMES E GATEWOOD OR 35.19 OVERPAY 02344300000 92/04/12.0033 LARSiN ROOER M WISTERIA ST 36.90 OVERPAY 02041400000 92/04113-0014 6UENRO;TRO, ROOOLFO MC60AMICK ST 40.00 OVERPAY 094241t00000 93104/13.0022 ROSAMOND HAROLD P OAK ST 435.87 OVERPAY 02418400000 92/04/13.0109 NEYVANSH60(00Ht, HOSSEIN N BRADSHAW ST 1.00 OVERPAY 13245700000 92/0404.0035 HERRON, ALBERT L CARRIAGE PILL 642.37 OVERPAY 02916400000 92/04/19-0099 LOPE? BARBARA PAISLEY 51 332.29 OVERPAY 00279200000 92/04/20.0019 THE VfLLAGE LAUNDRY W UNIVERS17Y 0 199 80 OVERPAY 02414600000 92/04/20.0230 KELLEY, LAVERNE PARK LN 5.00 OVERPAY TOTAL OF OVERPAYMENTS 48,470.05 0,00 l i r+t I: ; t T i . rt 4 CrfrY } I ri; COUNCIL } :14 -[I f zj z Mll f c~ MIM: llml ° r o I 1 0 0 Off, ti> o N . l O°O' Jam!' I TM TT- M-T ,t F agenda No _93 •00 5 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Agenda item S # C. Z. Date 2,77255.9.3 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Approval of a tax refund to Albert Herron/Republic Title Co, RECOMMENDATIOk.: e ax epartm(,nt has mailed an r)vcrpayment Letter and an Application for Refund to the taxpayer. All completed forms and necessary documenta- tion have Leen returned, requesting this refund, which the Tax Technician recommends, SUMMARY: iap er 31,11 of the Texas Property Tax Code reouires the approval of the governing body of the tnxinr, unit for refunds in excess of S 500,00, Republic Title Co, has renuested a refund in the amount of S (342,37 hecause they overpaid Albert T. Nerror's account, -'132457. BACKGROUND: Republic Title Co. made a payment of S n42,37 on r)ec 29, 1992 and the taxpayer's mortgage company also made payment of A r42,37 on Dec, 7.11, 1992, resulting in an overpayment. A tax refund is due, PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: The Tax Department and the tax accnunt of Albert I„ Herron FISCAL IMPACT: $ 642.37 RESPEC" LY SUBMITTED: Lloyd arre City anager Prepared by: Name c .c: ne. er Title Tax 'technician Approved: Name a e erson Title T surer 2633C/3 State ProPMY tax sore ABettda No AefundApplkaeon 31.11(Ut2) APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND Apendalttxn._Ls z• Dwe- Collecting Office Name,...- Collecting Tax For. - 1 axing Units) Address city. State, zip code In order to apply (of a tax refund, the following information mast be provided by the taxpayer. IDENT(FICATIOJN( OF PROPERTY OWNER: Name: 1Q-VXec 4) /r43 ,pT . Address: Li&1,44rcc Y,~1TOJ -76.207-1615- Telephone Number (if addit oval information is needed): IDENTIFICATION OF PRi PE/R/TY. Description of Property fdlF s r b~IT E ><f£ ISu r s yh! ,Zc K 6 DoT 3 ~ r j Address or Location of Property. cr Account Number of Property: -13,7yS 7 or Tax Receipt Number: INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES: Name of Taxing Unit Year for Amount of From Which Refund Which Refund Date of the Amount of Tax Refund Is Requested Is Requested Tax Payment Taxes Paid • _ Requested 1. L1~rY o~arov 19 4z i i 19 . C-~tr a~ f~u*esi _q2 $ - to 37 $ 2 19 3 19 /•2 .7 / 19 Z S _ra ~f.?• 3 7 s i19~ S $ _ Taxpayer's reason for refund (attach supporting documentation): rL I- eo4iyow 1 ND IlAer6A6£ t U f,4cV 10,4/D 7kt %r4 K£s FcA rile 74X.~, ti /rZ14,441c % r4E n i ~f~ut~fiN4 / .c'fPutiD & TN/t9 Cut.4' ,ur "I hereby apply for the refund of the abovedescribed taxes and certify that the information I have given on this form is true a rrec C r~,~ by ^ J Foy:'41 +&rc Trce X s I/lZ ~4r ,145 D ff~z Y, S,gn ure / 0£N eu % . 7v 205 Date o'} Application for Tax Refund DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND: Approval Disapproval Signature of Auth0,: ed Officer Date Signature of Presiding Officer(s) of Taxing Date Unit(s) for refund apphcabons over $500 Any parson who mak" a folio entry upon, theforegoingrecord shell tbefublecitooneofthefollowing Penalties; 1.ImpAsonn1s14101 not more than 10 years nor lass than 2 years andi'm a One of not mue than ta,kV or both such One and Imprlsonmenl; 2. consnr• ant In (alf for a term up to 1 year or a One not to exceed 112,000 or "such One and Imprleenmenl asset forth In Section 27,f0, Penal Code. *10UND 7r n Agqfld& No el 171-1 E FEFUeLtLTiTC£=5--~--72.Z fin lr fi1~i~$,►I~C r:~l~ , y N~/\%' i ~ /`\:.i `.ter: II I I YU-nT T TW'.i A~h i r+ sp nl i' rl co I I I REPORT FIOR05DW 01120193 AT 21.17 O V E R P A Y M E N T 5 PAGE 5 ACCOUNT NO. RECEIPT NO. NAME ADDR_SS AMOUNT STATUS OF PAYMENT . 03245700000 97104/06-0473 MARSHAL, JAMES PANHANDLE ST 21 69 OVERPAY MINOR CA 43.83 OVERPAY 07039600000 92104/06.0475 MARSHALL. SAMUEL L BOLIVAR ST 313.11 OVERPAY 09420400000 92104/06-0476 A 5D10AM14$5, TM S N LOCUST ST 229.95 OVERPAY 02613900000 92/01!06.0477 SMITH, STERLING L WESTC14ESYES DR 35.89 OVERPAY 01122700000 91104/00.0501 BRIGGS. JENNSFERY J ELAN ST 35.90 OVERPAY 02400600000 92/01/06-9553 RODEN, PEVTON i AV 2fl5.12 OVERPAY 02781600000 92/04/06-0569 MERKI, DONALD J 6 MARK J N ME BRECIEI DES RD 95.89 OVERPAY { 02561700000 92/04/06-0590 PRIDDY, CHAS M E UNIVERSITY D 0.01 OVERPAY 03667300000 92/04/06-0636 BROWN, K DALE SIERRA DR 35.00 OVERPAY 02996300000 91104/06-0641 HARLOS, STEVEN C E UNIVERSITY D 0.01 OVERPAY 03774400000 92/04/05.080 BROWN, K DALE CROW ST 35.69 OVERPAY 15631100000 92/04106-OB21 HUMAN, $ANOALL S BOLIVAR ST 0.01 OVERPAY 03313300000 92/04/08-DB15 BROWN, K DALE BERNARD St 0,01 OVERPAY 07159000000 92/01106-0821 BROWN, K DALE BERNARD ST 0.01 OVERPAY 02178600000 92104/06-0828 BROWN, ,K CALF 02706300000 92104/07-0024 FELDSIEIN. JOSHUA ROLL 678.81 OVERPAY 07513600000 92/04/07.0131 NORRIS. JACKIE R MI ROLLING NC HILLS 1,106.78 OVERPAY / 01552700000 92/04107-0192 HARGROVE41 JOHN H E~UA MIMOSA DR 510.06 OVERPAY 01287600000 02104107.0281 MCNARY, TCHELL RAY ANNA ST 38.90 OVERPAY 10199400000 92104/07.0308 DES TENA, ANDREW V W HICKORY ST 367.77 OVERPAY E WINDSOR ST 33.21 OVERPAY 11501000000 91/04/07-0309 MORTON, MICHAEL 0 3 02922700000 92/74/07-0352 MELTON, FRANCES COUCH LINWOOD OR 311.15 OVERPAY 396,99 02304500000 92104/07.0375 LANDRY, BARRY J BERNARD ST OVERPAY 5T 1 13322,.111 1 OVERPAY 02147700000 92/04107-0376 LINDSE Y, DAVID A DE WINDSOR S AY 11607500000 72/04107-0407 MORTON, MICHAEL G W CLLINS STT 745317..6523 OVERPAY 10868300000 92101106.0079 DANIEL, JOE M JR W A AY 02460400000 92104108-0137 SMITH, MARILYN N EMERSON SON L H 47,44 OVERPAY 90134500060 92104100-0160 SACHER, E 0 MD 6 ASSOC 1•]5 4 11 57,41 02891500000 92104108.0217 HULL, CHARLES LEE WOODHAVEN S1 2.00 OVERPAY 02740200000 02104/08.0577 CLOVER, DAN 5 WISTERIA ST 606.35 OVERPAY AY 02872700000 92/04108-0637 REA, DONALD G CLOVER R LO N N S7 676.21 35.89 OVERPAY OVERPAY 02932400000 92/04/08-0840 BUTCHER, CLEO H CL 02822200000 92/04/11-0074 CROISSANT, ROBERT S RIOGECREST CA 774.95 OVERPAY 03894300000 92104112.0008 HAVES, TERESA N LOCUST 57 069,09 OVERPAY AY 51166400000 92104112.0014 LOOM, TROY WITHERS S W P ST 7D L 35 36..90 69 OVERPAY AY 03355100000 92104/12.0017 CHURCH, WELDON 35 6. 889 6 O OVERPAY 16404900000 02104/12.0019 PANCER, JIMMY NORTH LAKE LT TR 16,46 10424500000 92/04/12-6021 CORPIE, GEORGE E E1UK . 03237300000 92/04/12.0024 WOLF, LEONARD MARTIN BIUEBERO CA 35.89 OVERPAY 02013800000 72/04/11-0027 SHADE, TOM 8 STONECAIE OR 35.90 OVERPAY 02900100000 92104/12-0029 LAMB, KELLEY E WOODBROOK ST 36.90 OVERPAY 10318300000 92/04111.0031 KIND JAMES E WISTERIA OR 3.89 OVERPAY 02144300000 02/04/12.0033 LARSim ROGER M WI SSfR1A 9T 350,90 OVERPAY 02547400000 91104113-0014 SULNRO§TRO, RDDOIFO MCCOR4ICK ST 10.00 OVERPAY 00418100000 92/04/13-0012 ROSAMOND HAROLD P OAK ST 436,67 OVERPAY 921 .EY VANSHOKOOH L 10 SEIN N BRAG SISAL Si 1 00 OOVVERPAY 2/18400000 Qg ~y -CAkRIAGE H1ll 642.37 ERPAY 32/ 4 14.0 9 L111,L 7TiT TC 019 THE <>:LB"~RA- NDRV W UNIVERSITY D 199.00 OVERPAY '--332792000079110 07711~b 9 02414500000 4120.0235 KELLEY. LAVERNE PARK LH 6.00 OVERPAY TOTAL OF OVERPAYMENTS 46,479.05 0.00 ~ ~ ZL L lv J IIT a Tj I` t}~ i C ITY COUNCIL I}`+ 1 Yt t 4Z4 iT~+ 0' C 0 CY `4+ ,MA 0 O s :ml M-m O q O K t ~ QQ~O 1: To: I :11:21 :n mx: 1- t i 1 ~ k gendaNo ~_g~ DO S r agendaltem ~S ~4~~~• h CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT ltta ---?:_2.93 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council p 7 ` FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Approval of a taX refund to Teresa Mayes RECOMMENDATION: - The Tax Department hits received a supplement from the Appraisal District J for 1992 making a correction to the appraised value based on a protest by r Teresa Hayes reducing the tax owed in 1c)P2. Teresa Hayes is due a refund which the Tax Technician recommends. SUWARY: Chapter 31.11 of the Texas vroperty Tax Code reauires the anoroval or the governing hodv of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of e 500.0f1, Teresa Hayes is due a refund of S 884,51 on City Account # 03(;843 due to a reduced aopraised value in 1097. BACKGROUND: Teresa Hayes paid the 1992 tax on Account, 0 036843 in full on 12-12-92. A supplement changing the appraised value of the, Improvements reduced the tax for 1992, This reduction warrants a refund of S 884.51. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: I The Tax Department and the tax account of Teresa Hayes. FISCAL IMPACT: $ 884.51 RESPE LLY SUBMI'TED: LloyVV. arre City -Manager Prepared by: eme Vic Schneider Title Tnx Technician Approved: Name lla Person Title Tr(, . rer 2633C/3 1942 S HPL!•E+7A1 .0/47 1124784 PAGE 7 ! ROPEHTY TAX HOIt for. ti I r, nF t~EV7.1. (C S) YEA t lov Mt~rEl t 0 n WE TAO 'AL ' E 5 i ~ FR NA~4[ni4 AEI UC Sri I [H1rrFUir O(~CpiP riQq r 1.'~ ~1 t~~E M A,. uJn~ AVOU~j .M. ( t•,. l 45102f7 f83suU + l-l1. 3l~ .4 I PR MS S 9.533 9,533 CnRISI 445' VAN :LAXEA?JD EST MHP, SPACE 22, Il 3959 TEASLEY LN 122 ~19EN14L 1 K47XSN302217 yl.~ aENId'r, IN 76205 p COS ASSESSED IT 0 9,533 •9,533 ICNIITIESt RECEIPT TAMABLE 3 0 9r 533 11.9,533 2tl2S ! IAA A41 I 0.00 68,45 •68.45 EXEAPTIDNII SJPP COVET OLLE(E - DELETE 40dILE NUKE MOVEO ..I v511664 (29710!) } ...................................1 i IDJM, IR'14 LkNEMO31 151 MnP, SPACE 274, 4p r/191 .Ire IMPR MS S Or7TY )Or 774 3939 TE43LEY Low •279 SERIAL 4 N/A r 2[ nL~+1UV, la 102D4 SII05t 3934 If ASLEV LN 8274 2;!`/l OS ASSESSED S 0r774 10,774 0 PECEIP IAx48LE S Sr 774 10;774 •5;000 IENIIIIE51 1..01, 505, C05' £uS • 2494 TAX 441 S 41.46 11.36 •35.90 i EAEvP110'15t HS ISJPP CUDEI C - CHANGE ADDED rS EV '......N........................... ................jMPR NS..i....~............. '^5)1495 (2o62Shl I1S,449 4,j( ~3,44q IJRRANCE, HAZEL 9[CAN CREEP MHP, SPACE 49, 1- .1 1 2001 s 0AYHILL 644 SERIAL //1 f/j S DEMON, TA 76205 S)TUS: 260E S MAYHILL 449 COS 45SE33EO S 3,449 131449 0 NELEIPf IAxAdLE S 0 13,449 13,449 ENTITIESI GOT. 505; COS, EOS 4 3108 TAX ACT S 0,00 96,56 96, Sb EOEMPTIONSI H8,04 FR267 161.91 SJPP CUDEI C - CHANGE l ADDED -HS,U.• FROM M124469 _ NS684S1•TEHESA 29758) ~ !I, MAYES, (29738 .AO1664 BBB4CNN, TRACT 420 ACRfS 0-93 (A LAND NHS f 9,021 69;011 6207 044HANM 0,9963, OLD OCAD TR 8 /-J) 9j EMPR kn9 f 2 2.009 ee;)o0 SAN ALI JNIO, IX 76230 SItUSI 2830 4 LOCUST AvCOS ASSESSED 1 3 1;930 750121 23,191 ✓ ENTITIES: D011 SOS, COS, EV5 HELEIPI TAx4BLE S 3 1,930 75;121 23,191 A 4335 tax AMT f 2 26,86 411,37 654.S3 ~1EXL4PTIONSI ~3UPJP CODEI C CHANGE ~ VALUE I ORK TED w ~ •...u w.......s.,.......... ...•.....ru.....•. +.u. y.•.r......r.. ..r. u.o.u. .r•u.u u.rs i R3Se51 (144491+) . j CMURCH, HELDON BELLIC C, BLOCK L LOT 6(RSO' OF ! LAND MS f 3,519 3,519 515 wl M[N9 11370(1500), OLD DCAD A0165, IN 1 l-/~-gdr4'~ IMPR HS t 5,919 15;019 DENION, IA 76201 SITUSI Sts HIIHERS tilt S ASSESSED f 9,436 19,438 0 ENTITIESI 601, 605, COS; EOS 4fCfIP TAMABLE S 4,430 19,430 -S,OOD 1 6026 TAX A41 S 03,06 139,56 -35.90 T EXEMPIIONSI HS C\ SUPP CUDEI C - CHANGE 3J 1 U ADDED HS EA W A................... W 8164544 (296219) 0 RAHNEM; JlvvY ~irtN709 EST, LOT Sb N 112 (1'H IMPR HS t 2,352 20352 HT 1 30 N CUfT0N1JOU LN k090), MH StklkI A 2FN14661547r UL4fUhr ix 76201 TITLE 1 IN 1510170 COS 6S3(bSED I 2.352 2052 D i SITUSI CUTTONNUOD LN RECEIPT TAXABLE 1 0 2;352 •20352 ✓ 1,- A 13026 TAX A41 1 0.00 16.89 1•t0.89 W ENTITIESI 601, Sol, COS, 101 REPORT F10 R05OW 0 1 i 21/93 AT 23.47 O V E R P A Y M E N T S PAGE 5 ACCOUNT NO. RECEIPT NO. NAME. ADDRESS AMOUNT STATUS Of PAYMENT 03323300000 92/04,06-0825 BROWN, K DALE eOLIVAR St 0,01 OVERPAY 02159000000 92J04J06•D827 BROWN. K DALE BERNARD St 0.01 OVERPAY 02178600000 92/04"06-0828 BROWN, K DALE BERNARD ST 0.01 OVERPAY 02706300000 92!04107-0024 FELDSTEIN. JOSHUA FALLMEADOW 57 678.81 OVERPAY 075t3600000 92/04/07-0131 NORRIS. JACKIE R MD ROLLING HILLS 1.206.78 OVERPAY 02552700000 92104/07-0192 HARGROVE. JOHN H ETUM MIMOSA OR 510,06 OVERPAY 10199400000 92/04'07-0305 DESTENA, ANDREW V W HICKORY 5T 169.77 OVERPAY 11507900000 92/04107-0309 MORTON. MICHAEL G E WINDSOR St 397,:1 OVERPAY 02922700000 92/04/07-0352 MELTON, FRANCES COUCH LINWOOD OR 331,15 OVERPAY 02304500000 92/04/07-0375 LANDRY. BARRY J EERNARO ST 39609 OVERPAY j 02147700000 92/04/07.0376 LINDSEY, DAVID A DCNTON 5T 131.11 OVERPAY 11507500000 92/04107-0407 MORTON, MICHAEL G F WINDS~2 ST 161.52 OVERPAY i' 10868300000 92/04/08.0079 DANIEL, JOE M JR W COLLINS ST 232.53 OVERPAY 024684000CD 92/04/08.0137 SMITH, MARILYN N EVERSON LN 475.78 OVERPAY 90134500000 92/04/08-0156 SACHER, E C MD 4 ASSOC 1-35 Y 13 57.44 OVERPAY 02891800000 92104/08-0217 NULL, CHARLES LEE WOODHAVEN St 2.00 OVERPAY 02340200000 92/04/08.0577 CIOWER, DAN S WISTERIA ST 606.35 OVERPAY 02972700000 92/04/08.0637 REA. DONALD 0 WOODHAVEN ST 675.21 OVERPAY 01932+100000 92/04108-0840 BUTCHER, CLEO H CLOVER LN -'35.19 OVERPAY Ago, A" a7/AA/1t-C07A ❑HOI .AL2t1Ecg F%I 1.A 774 of [3 VF CPIV 0;114101* 000 92/04/12.0008 HAS,TRE E~ SA _ N LOCUST 5T 888.09 OVERPAY E'AOCT47587 PITV 03385100000 92/04/12-0017 CHURCH, WELDON WITHERS St --35.90 OVERPAY 16454900000 92104112.0019 PANCER, JIMMY COTTONWOOD -16.all OVERPAY 02542400000 92/04/13.0014 BUENROSIRO. RODOLFD MCCORMICK ST 40.00 OVERPAY 024t8400000 92/04/13.0109 KEYVANSHOKOOHI, HOSSEIN N BRADSHAW ST 1.00 OVERPAY 13245700000 92/04/14.0035 HERRON, ALBERT L CARRIAGE HILL 642.37 OVERPAY 02978400000 92/04!19.0009 LOPEZ, BARBARA PAISLEY ST 332.29 OVERPAY 90219200000 92104/20.0019 THE VILLAGE LAUNDRY W UNIVERSITY D 199.80 OVERPAY 02414600000 92104120.0235 KELLEY, LAVERNE PARK LN 5.00 OVERPAY TOTAL OF OVERPAYMENTS 47,361,15 0.00 1 1 QILS 'I W llt~t••~+~' r i sr.i + I ~ T Zj i*l1 1 22}}1 k:: CITY SY M., COUNCIL 1 111M 17, x$rt 14 .1] I 44144 or a~ XT 4 4 a 0 e ti r o M t• ~O~J ~~DO OG4 ,1 apendeNe 3.OO ORDINANCE NO. Aperdajfw_ .2 . - Dhle- Y 93 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CON4A'CT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVID- ING FOR THE, EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated com- petitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and i WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the ma- terials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted herein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the numbered items in the following numbered bids for materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid Proposals" attached herto, are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids for such items: BID ITEM NUMBER NO VENDOR AMOUNT 2443 ALL EMS USA EXHIBIT A 1449 1,2,6,7,8,9 CLASSIC CHEVROLET $ 90,313.00 1449 1,5,10 NORTH LOOP DODGE $ 64,504.00 1449 11,12,13 HUDIBURG CHEVROLET $ 57,084.60 1449 4 KARL KLEMENT FORD $ 12,934.34 1452 ALL COLLECTION EXPRESS SERVICES EXHIBIT B 1454 ALL FIBER LINE SUPPLY INC. $ 29,249.44 1457 1458 AALL BARRETT WHITE GMC 46,590.00 DAVIS TRUCK AND EQUIPMENT $ 69,208.00 1459 ALL POWELI. INDUSTRIES $148,200.00 SECTION II. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted bids, the city accepts the offer of the persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to purchase ::he materials, 9quipment, supplies or services in accordance with the terms, specifications, standards, quantities and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, aid proposals, and related documents. AgendaNo._ 93-005 Agen4altem_1~ SECTION III. That should the city and persons submitting ap- proved and accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bids, the city Manager or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions, spec- - ifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained in the Bid Proposal and related documents herein approved and accepted. _$fCTION IV. That by the acceptance and al of th above numbered items of the submitted bids, the City v Council ehereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTION Y. That this ordinance shall become effective imme- diately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1993. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY, APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: EXHIBIT 'A' BID 4 1443 I I I 1 EMS USA I I FMS USA 1 BID NAM Medical Supplies I I 1 ~i I I I 1 OPEN DATE December 15, 1992 I I I I 1 _ 1 1 I ~ 1 1QUANTITYI DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I I $ IQUANTITYI DESCRIPTION 1 VENDOR 1 ' -1-1 I _1 1-1-1- 1 24 jAirway naeopharyngeal 20fr 1 $2.96 1 131 1 12 IMacintoah Laryngoscope Slade 11 $25.41 1 2 1 24 (Airway naeopharyngeal 24fr I $2.96 1 132 1 12 1Harintosh Laryngoscope Slade 21 $25.41 1 3 1 24 1Airway naeopharyngeal 28fr 1 $2.96 1 133 1 12 IMacintoah Laryngoecope Blade 31 $25.41 j 4 ( 24 (Airway naeopharyngeal 30fr 1 $2.96 1 134 1 12 [Macintosh Laryngoscope Blade 41 $25.41 1 5 1 24 1Airway naeopharyngeal 32fr 1 $2.96 1 135 1 12 lwieconein Laryngoscope Blade 11 $25.41 6 1 24 1Airway oropharyngeal 43mm 1 $0.16 1 136 1 12 lwieconein Laryngoecope Blade 21 $25.41 1 7 1 24 {Airway oropharyngeal 60mm 1 $0.16 1 137 1 12 lwieconein Laryngoscope Blade 31 $25.41 1 8 1 24 (Airway oropharyngeal 80mm 1 $0.16 1 138 1 12 lwisconein Laryngoscope Blade 41 $25.41 J 9 J 24 1Airway oropharyngeal 90mm $0.16 1 139 1 6 ILaryngoscope Handle 1 $16.32 1 10 1 24 1Airway oropharyngeal 100mm 1 $0.16 1 140 1 2 bx INeedle, Aspiration 1 $100.00 1 11 1 36 bx (Alcohol Prep I $1.65 1 141 1 6 1Obstet:ical Kit 1 $5.82 J 12 J 4 cc 1Bandage, Triangular 20/ce 1 $110.00 1 142 1 6 lOxygen 1 $174.81 1 13 1 12 bx lBand4id 1" $2.43 1 143 1 2 cc loxygen Mack 1 $93.45 1 14 1 12 bx 18andaid 2" 1 $2.64 1 144 1 4 1PedL-Pac 1 $205.00 1 15 1 10 cc jBlanket, Disposable 1 $32.50 1 145 1 12 1Reauscitator, child 1 $108.12 1 16 1 75 ICervicai Collar, Pedi 1 $8.50 1 146 1 12 1Resuscit,%tor, Infant 1 $100.62 17 1 150 ICervical Collar, Short 1 $6.50 1 147 1 30 (Scissors 1 $3.95 1 18 1 5 cc 1Comprees, Cold i $8.64 1 148 1 6 ISphygmomanometer 1 $49.80 1 19 1 1 cs 1Compress, Hot 1 $11.50 1 149 1 1 ca ISuction Catheter 1 $28.50 1 20 1 12 cc 1Dreeeing 4" 1 $40.00 1 150 1 4 cc ISuction, Yankaur 24/ce 1 $41.40 1 21 1 6 cc 1Dressing 4" x 4" 2/pk 1 $66.00 1 151 1 24 bx 1Tapu, I" 1 $15.17 1 22 1 6 cc {Dressing 4" x 4" 10/tub 1 $66.00 1 152 1 36 bx ITape, 2" 1 $15.17 1 23 1 3 bx IEndotracheal Tube S.Omm 1 $20.00 1 1 1 1 1 I 24 1 lO `x IEndotracheal Tube 7.Omm 1 $20.00 1 1 I I DELIVERYt 1 7 days 1 25 1 SO bx lEndotracheal Tube B.Omm 1 $20.00 1 26 1 4 bx JEndotracheal Tube Uncuffed 2.51 $19.00 1 27 1 3 bx lEndotracheal Tube Uncuffed 3.01 $19.00 1 28 J 4 bx lEndotracheal Tube Uncuffed 4.01 $19.00 1 29 1 6 cc 11V Catheter 18 ga. I $200.00 1 30 1 4 cc liV Catheter 20 ga. 1 $200.00 1 ~o tondsNo 9~4 C S_ . Ag"da ItrL e,~_ #5_,. f1 BID 1 1452 f ~tle.__v3'_•2_ BID NAME COLLECTION HONOR Collection services EXPRESS CREDITORS f OPEN DATE I SERVICES AGENCY January 5, 1993 EXHIBIT B DESCRIPTION I VENDOR ~ VENDOR ~ Service Fee Based on Recovery Only 28% R 33 1/3% Expressed as a Percantage + r IiI i simusessome- i Agenda No OD__ Agenda lion) DATVt FEBRUARY- 2,.1993 CITY COUNCIL REPORT ; TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID it 1443 - MEDICAL SUPPLIES RECOMMENDATION: Council approve award of Bid #1443 - Medical Supplies to the over all low bidder, EMS USA, for an estimated annual expenditure of $16,000 (see I Exhibit A). SUMMARY: Bids on medical supplies used by the EMS division of the Fire Department were received December 15, 1992, EMS USA was the only vendor to bid on alI items combined. This bid will be for a period of one year upon Council approval. I BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet, Memorandum from Capt. Sessions, EMS Manager, PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Fire Department. FISCAL IMPACT: Payments shall be made from budgeted funds In account #100-060- 0053-8106 which has a balance of $45,605.10 as of January 26, 1993. Respectfully submitted: i Lio d V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by., J i r-~-~.-- ame: Mela lie Harden Title: Buyer Apppprrovveed:: Name: Tom Shaw, C.P,h1. Title: Purchasing Agent 1W agorda i i i EXHIBIT 'A' 1 BID I 1443 I I EMS USA EMS USA I 1 BID NAME Medical Supplies f ~ I I OPEN DATE. December 15, 1992 ~ f I_ I i I 11QUANTITYI DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I I I JQUANTITYI DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I _f i I I I_I _I_ I i I 1 1 24 (Airway naeopharyngeal 20fr 1 $2.96 I 131 1 12 IMacintosh Laryngoscope Blade 11 $25.41 1 2 1 24 1Airway naeopharyngeal 24fr 1 $2.96 1 132 1 12 IMacintosh Laryngoscope Blade 2 1 I $25.41 3 1 24 (Airway naeopharyngeal 28fr $2.96 I 133 1 12 IMacintosh Laryngoscope Blade 31 $25.41 1 4 1 24 (Airway naeopharyngeal 30fr $2.96 1 134 1 12 IMacintosh Laryngoscope Blade 41 $25.41 1 5 1 24 (Airway naeopharyngeal 32fr 1 $2.96 1 135 1 12 1Wisconein Laryngoscope Blade 11 $25.41 1 6 1 24 (Airway oropharyngeal 41= 1 $0.16 1 136 1 12 1Wisconsin Laryngoscope Blade 21 $25.41 1 7 1 24 1Airway oropharyngeal 60mm 1 $0.16 1 137 1 12 1Wisconsin Laryngoscope Blade 31 $25.41 1 8 1 24 (Airway oropharyngeal 80mm 1 $0.16 1 138 1 12 1Wisconein Laryngoscope Blade 41 $25.41 1 9 1 24 1Airway oropharyngeal 9Cmm $0.16 1 139 1 6 ILaryngoscope Handle 1 $16.32 1 10 1 24 (Airway oropharyngeal 100mm 1 $0.16 1 140 1 2 bx INeedle, Aspiration 1 $100.00 1 11 1 36 bx (Alcohol Prep 1 $1.65 1 141 1 6 lobstetrical Kit 1 $5.82 1 12 1 4 ce Ieandage, Triangular 20/ce 1 $110.00 1 142 1 6 loxygen 1 $174.81 1 13 1 12 bx 18andaid 1" $2.43 1 143 1 2 cs loxygen Mask 1 $93.45 1 14 1 12 bx Isandaid 2" $2.64 1 144 1 4 IPedi-Pac 1 $205.00 1 15 1 10 ce 1Blanket, Disposable $32.50 1 145 1 12 IReauscitator, Child 1 $108.12 1 16 1 75 ICervical Collar, Pedi $6.50 1 146 1 12 IResuscitator, infant 1 $100.62 1 17 1 150 ICervical Collar, Short $8.50 1 147 1 30 16Ciasors 1 $3.95 1 ! 18 1 S ce 1Compreae, Cold 1 $8.64 1 148 1 6 (Sphygmomanometer 1 $49.80 1 19 1 1 ce lComprear, Hot 1 $11.50 1 149 1 1 ca ISuction Catheter I $28.50 1 20 1 12 cs 1Dressin7 4" f $40.00 1 150 1 4 co 16uction, Yankaur 24/co f $41.40 1 21 I 6 ce IDrseaitj 4" x 4" 2/pk 1 $66.00 1 151 1 24 bx ITape, 1" 1 $15.17 1 22 I 6 cs 1Dressing 4" x 4" 10/tub 1 $66.00 1 152 1 36 bx ITape, 2" f $35.17 1 23 1 3 bx IEndotracheal Tube S.Omm 1 $20.00 1 1 I 1 I I 24 1 10 bx lEndotracheal Tube 7.0mm 1 $20.00 1 1 1 1 DELIVERY( 1 7 1 !h 25 1 10 bx lEndotracheal Tube B.Omm 1 $20.00 1 26 1 4 bx lEndotracheal Tube Uncuffed 2.51 $19.00 1 27 1 3 bx IEndotracheal Tube Uncuffed 3.01 $19.00 1 ~l 23 1 4 bx lEndotracheal Tube Uncuffed 4.01 $19.00 1 29 1 6 or 11V Catheter 18 ga. $200.00 1 30 I 4 cr 11V catheter 20 ga. 1 $200.00 1 1 11 rl~ I ~ BID 1 1443 (p. 1 of 2) I I I I 1 1 1 EMS USA I ARMSTRONG 1 MATRX 1 MOORE I BAXTER 1 BID NAME Medical Supplies I MEDICAL { MEDICAL J MEDICAL I DIAGNOSTICS ( ~ I I I I I OPEN DATE December 15, 1992 ( 1 I I 1 I I I--- I I $ (QUANTITY( DESCRIPTION I VENDOR 1 VENDOR { VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR 1 I I I I__ I I_ I _I 1 1 24 (Airway nasopharyngeal 20fr I $2.96 I $2.75 I :4.15 I NIB I No Bid J 2 I 24 (Airway nasopharyngeal 24fr 1 $2.96 1 $2.75 I $4.15 1 N/B I All Items 1 3 I 24 (Airway nasopharyngeii~ 28fr $2.96 1 $2.75 I $4.15 1 $4.10 I I 4 j 24 1Airway nasopharyngeal 30fr { $2.96 1 $2.75 1 $4.15 1 $4.10 I 1 5 1 24 (Airway nasopharyngeal 32fr I $2.96 I $2.75 1 $4.15 { $4.10 1 1 6 I 24 (Airway oropharyngeal 43mm I $0.16 1 $0.15 I $0.24 I $0.24 [ I 7 1 24 (Airway oropharyngeal 60mm 1 $0.16 1 $0.15 1 $0.24 1 $0.24 { I B 1 24 (Airway oropharyngeal 80mm 1 $0.16 1 $0.15 I $0.24 I $0.24 I I 9 1 24 (Airway oropharyngeal 90mm 1 $0.16 1 $0.15 1 $0.24 I $0.24 I I 10 I 24 1Airway oropharyngeal 100mm I $0.16 J $0.15 $0.24 I $0.24 I } 11 1 36 bx (Alcohol Prep 1 $1.65 I $1.65 1 $2.05 1 $1.80 1 I 12 1 4 ca IBandage, Triangular 20/cs I $110.00 I $130.00 1 $115.20 1 $92.00 I I 13 1 12 bx 1Bandaid 1" I $2.43 I N/3 1 $2.87 1 $3.45 1 I 14 1 12 bx 18andaid 2" J $2.64 I NIB I NIB 1 $5.37 I 1 15 1 10 ca IBlanket, Disposable 1 $32.50 1 $41.00 I $41.50 I $43.00 1 16 I 75 ICervical Collar, Pedi 1 $8.50 1 $10.50 1 $10.45 I $10.77 I I 17 I 150 [Cervical Collar, Short I $8.50 I $10.50 1 $10.45 I $10.77 1 I 18 I 5 ce [Compress, Cold I $6.64 I $16.80 1 $10.80 I $6.68 1 1 19 1 1 cs (Compress, Rot I $11.50 I $21.60 1 $13.20 1 $14.16 1 } 20 1 12 cs (Dressing 4" I $40.00 I NIB 1 $53.12 1 $62.60 1 I 21 1 6 ce (Dressing 4" x 4" 2/pk I $66.00 1 NIB 1 $82.32 I $68.!0 I I 22 1 6 ce (Dressing 4" x 4" 10/tub I $66.00 1 N/B I $185.76 I NIB I I 23 1 3 bx 1Endotracheal Tube 5.0nm 1 $20.00 1 $19.00 I $25.60 [ $25.00 I I 24 1 10 bx 16ndotracheal Tube 7.Omm 1 $20.00 1 $19.00 1 $25.60 I $25.00 1 2S 1 30 bx IEndotracheal Tube S.Omm 1 $20.00 I $19.00 1 $25.60 I $25.00 I 26 1 4 bx IEndotracheal Tube Uncuffed 2.51 $19.00 1 $12.50 1 $13.50 I NIB [ 27 1 3 bx IEndotracheal Tube Uncuffed 3.01 $19.00 1 $12.50 1 $13.50 1 NIB } 28 1 4 bx (Endotracheal Tube Uncuffed 4.01 $19.00 I $12.50 1 $13.50 1 NIB 1 29 1 6 ce 11V Catheter 18 ga. 1 $200.00 1 N/8 1 $264.00 I $239.80 1 °I 30 1 4 cs 11V Catheter 20 ga. I $200.00 1 N/B 1 $364.00 1 $219.80 I I W ~ t ~ N Z BID ! 1443 (p. 2 of 2) I I 1 f BID NAME I EMS USA I ARMSTRONG I MATRX MOORE BAXTER J Medial Supplies I I MEDICAL I MEDICAL I MEDICAL I DIAGNOSTICS I I I I I I 1 OPEN DATE December 15, 1992 I ~ I I I I ! I ~ I I_ I ! ~QUANTITYI DESCRIPTION VENDOR I VENDOR VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR -1-1 j 1 31 I 12 IMacintosh Laryngoscope Blade 11 $25.41 I $27.45 I $24.75 1 $30.70 I No Bid I 32 I 12 IMacintosh Laryngoscope Blade 21 $25.41 1 $27.45 1 $24.75 I $30.70 I All items 1 33 I 12 [Macintosh Laryngoscope Blade 31 $25.41 I $27.45 I $24.75 1 $30.70 I I 34 I 12 IMacintosh Laryngoacope Blade 41 $25.41 { $27.45 I $24.75 { $30.70 I 1 35 12 (Wisconsin Laryngoscope Blade 11 $25.41 I $27.45 [ $24.75 I $30.70 I f 36 I 12 (Wisconsin Laryngoscope Blade 21 $25.41 I $27.45 J $24.75 I $30.70 J 37 [ 12 1wisconsin Laryngoscope Blade 31 $25.41 1 $27.45 I $24.75 I $30.70 I I 38 I 12 [Wisconsin Laryngoscope Blade 41 $25.41 I $27.45 [ $24.75 I $30.70 I { 39 I 6 ILaryngoscope Handle I $16.32 ( $14.75 1 $16.95 I $19.30 [ 40 1 2 bx INeedle, Aspiration 1 I $100.00 ~ $103.50 1 $136.00 I NIB 41 I 6 (Obstetrical Kit I $S.82 { $5.45 I $5.70 1 $5.20 I 1 42 I 6 (oxygen $174.81 I NIB I $162.00 [ $185.63 I I 43 I 2 cs [Oxygen Mask I $93.45 I $60.50 I $70.00 1 $103.95 I I 44 I 4 IPedi-Pac I $205.00 I $230.00 $216.00 { $226.29 I I 45 I 12 IResuscitator, Child [ $108.12 1 $95.85 { NIB I $167.50 I 1 46 I 12 [Resuscitator, Infant I $100.62 I $89.40 I NIB I $157.72 I 47 I 30 IScissors I $3.95 I $1.78 I $3.49 I $3.20 I 48 I 6 ISphygmomanometer I $49.60 I $128.50 I NIB [ NIB I I 49 ( 1 ce ISuction CAtheter I $28,50 I NIB I NIB I NIB I I 50 I 4 ce ISuction, Yankaur 24/cs [ $41.40 J NIB I NIB 1 $46.08 S1 24 bx 52 ( 36 bx Ipe, 1" I $15.17 I N/8 I $13.95 I $14.77 I I 1TePer 2" i $15.17 i NIB $9.90 I $11.17 I I I 1 1 I DELIVERYl I 7 days I 7-10 days I 1S days I 3-5 days I 1(#48 30 d&ys)l I I 1 I I J $100 minimum 1 I $50 minimum I 1 'u AQWsNo Agerdaftem /0J I I'1 1 1' ~ 1 ~1 p G/ MEMORAMUAI j TO: Melanie Harden, Purchasing I FROM: Captain Sessions, EMS Manager DATE: January 20, 1992 SUBJECT: Bid for Medical Supplies I would like to recommend to the Denton City Council that we accept B.ld Number 1443 given by EMS USA, P.O. Box 99, Sheperdvillo, KY, 40165. MS/lh h ti ficendaNo Aovdallent,._ 5 11, A D AN'C-TEDRUARY.$ # .1993 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID / 1449 - FLEET VEHICLES RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specifications for each of the 13 items totaling 18 vehicles. Award recommendation along with specific optional Items that were bid as options but do not appear on the tab sheet are listed below. To Classic Chevrolet Item 1,2,6,7,8 and 91 1. Fire - 4 Door sedan $10,622 + $275 spotlights $10,897.00 2. Fire - Utility Vehicle $14,224 + $275 spotlights $14,499.00 6. Electric - 3/4 Ton Cab/Chassis $11,258.00 7. solid Waste - 3/4 Ton Pickup 4 x 4 $13,191.00 7. Water Production - 3/4 Ton Pickup 4 x 4 $13,191.00 f B. Electric - 3/4 Ton Pickup 4 r. 4 $14,857 + $235 mirrors $14,857.00 1 9. Fire - 3/4 Ton Van $12,038 + A/C $678 + $280 spotlights $12,420.30 TOTAL $90,313.00 To North Loop Dodge Item 3, 5 and 101 3. Electric - (3) 1/2 Ton Pickups $9,795 + A/C $465 $27,760.00 5. Sewer - 3/4 Ton Plrkup $11,690.00 10. Fire - 1 Ton Chassis $12,038 + A/C $678 + $280 spotlights $12,996.00 10, Park - 1 Ton Cab/Chassis $12,038.00 TOTAL $640504.00 To Hudiburg Chevrolet Items 11, 12, and 131 11. Fire - 1 Ton Cab/Chassis $11#573 + A/C $668.15 $12,241.15 12. Electric - ill 1 Ton Chassis Diesel $13,340 + A/C$668.15 $28,016.30 13. Water Prod.- 15,000 OVW Chassis Diesel $16,159+A/C$668.1S $16,827.15 TOTAL $57#084.60 I Aoeoda No Agenda llsgL.Z7 S l A CITY COUNCIL REPORT FEBRUARY 2, 1993 PAGE 2 OF 2 To Karl Klement Ford Item 41 4. Municipal Lab - 1/2 Ton Pickup 4x4 112,934.34 TOTAL $12,934.34 r Total Bid Award $224,835.94 j SUMMARY, These vehicles are motorpool replacements (17 units) or fleet additions 0 unit) approved during the budget process. E he lower cost offered by Classic Chevrolet on item 4 fails to meet engine spevifications. The lower cost offered by Klement Ford on Item number 13 Is not acceptable. Thu Ford truck has a width of 94 Inches. We required a maximum width of 88 Inches so the old utility body could be utilized. BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet. FISCAL IMPACT: This purchase will be funded from a combination of motorpool replacement funds, 1992-93 budget funds for vehicle replacements or fleet additions and Certificate of Obligation funds. Respec ully submitted: Lio d Harrell City Manager Approved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent 771.~p~n4~ I BID 1 1449 I I I I I I ~ I I I i I I BID NAME FLEET VEHICLES IDENTON MOTORSIARENDALE FORDIJF14ES WOOD-{KARL KLEHENTI HUDIBURG I CLASSIC I IDENTON INC IFORD-MERCURY( CHEVROLET I CHEVROLET I OPEN DATE JANUARY 19, 1993 I I I I I I I $ {QTaI DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR VENDOR I 'I I I ! I ~ I I I 1. 1 1 (SEDAN 4 DOOR MID-SIZE 1 $11,806.98 1 $11,414.00 1$11,827.03 1 $11,099.29 1 $10,807.00 1 $10,622.00 1 i I 1 1 { 1 I I I I 2. 1 1 (UTILITY VEHi_I,E 4-DOOR I $17,461.50 I NIB 1$15,998.61 1 NIB 1 $16,307.00 1 $14,224.00 1 I I I i I I I I f 1 3 IPICKUP 1/2 TON SWB I $9,098.50 I NIB 1$11,755.24 1 $8,831.43 1 $9,391.00 1 $10,594.00 1 I I I I I I I I I 4. 1 1 IPICKUP 1/2 TON 4 X 4 1 $13,239.50 I N/B 1$14,299.67 1 $12,934.34 1 $13,045.00 1 $11,772.00 1 I I ~ I I l I I I 5. 1 1 IPICKUP 3/4 TON LWB 1 $12,617.00 I NIB 1$13,017.39 1 $12,468.58 1 $12,286.00 1 $11005.00 1 6. I 1 ICAB-CHASSIS 3/4 TON I $12,944.00 I NIB 1$12,978.75 1 $11,943.58 1 $12,023.00 1 $11,258.00 I I I I I I I I I I 7. 1 2 IPICKUP 3/4 TON 4 X 4 I $15,170.50 1 NIB 1$14,665.84 1 $14,747.00 1 $13,505.00 1 $13,191.00 1 1 I I I I ! I I I 8. 1 IPICKUP 3/4 TON 4 X 4 DIESEL 1 $17,463.50 1 NIB 1$16,515.80 1 $16,266.87 1 $14,821.00 1 $14,622.00 1 I I I I I I I I i 9. 1 1 IVAN 3/4 TON CARGO I NIB 1 NIB 1$13,669.86 1 $13,449.62 1 $11,960.00 1 111,863.00 1 I I I I I I I f I 10.1 2 ICAB-CHASSIS 1TN DUALREAR WHEELI $13,224.50 1 NIB 1$14,529.60 1 $13,268.47 1 $12,213.00 1 $12,234.00 1 1 ; I I I I I I I 11.1 1 ICAB-CHASSIS STN SOL REAR WHEELI $12,439.00 1 NIB I=13,692.94 1 $12,484.21 1 $11,513.00 1 $11,594.00 1 I I I I I I I 1 I 12.1 2 ICAB-CHASSIS 1 TON DIESEL I f14,959.00 I NIB 1514,850.45 1 $14,325.51 1 $13,340.00 1 $13,497.0 1 I I I I I I ! I I ~ 13.1 1 ICAB-CHASSIS 15000 GVW DIESEL 1 $17,560.00 1 NIB 1$18,076.85 1 $16,075.10 1 $16,159.00 1 $190837.0 1 I I I I I I I I 1 DELIVERY 1 60 DAYS ARO 1 60 DAYS ARO 145-80 DAYS 1 45-90 DAYS 1 45-60 DAYS 1 40-70 I JDAY11 NET 10 ARG I I I I I I I I I I I { I I I N ~ GIN PAGE 2 OF 2 BID # 1449 j I I I I I E I I 1 I l I BID NAME FLEET VEHICLES ! BILL UTTER I NORTH LOOP 1 I I I DODGE ! DODGE INC. I I I I OPEN DATE JANUARY 19, 1993 ! ! I I I ! 1 I I I i 1 # IQTYI DESCRIPTION ! VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR ! VENDOR I VENDOR I _1_I I I I I I _^I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1. 1 1 ISEDAN 4 DOOR MIDSIZE j NIB I $10,840.00 I I I I 1 ! 1 I I I I I I I 2. 1 1 (UTILITY VEHICLE 4-DOOR I NIB I NIB I I I I ! ! I ! I I I ! I { I 3. 1 3 IPICKUP 1/2 TON SWB I $11,486.50 1 $8,795.00 I I I I I I I I I i I I I I 4. 1 1 IPICKUP 1/2 TON 4 X 4 1 $14,338.97 I $14,000.00 I { I I I I I I I I I I I I 5. 1 1 IPICKUP 3/4 TON LWS I $13,367.70 I 111,690.00 I I I I I 6. 1 1 ICAB-CHASSIS 3/4 -0.4 I =13,186.95 I $11,619.00 I I I I I I I I 1 I I ! I ! 7. 1 2 IPICKUP 3/4 TON 4 X 4 I $15,433.06 { $14,962.00 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I ! 8. I I IPICKUP 3/4 TuN 4 X 4 DIESEL { $19,359.56 I $19,102.00 I I I I I I I I I I f I I I 9. 1 1 IVAN 3/4 TON CARGO I $15,399.15 I $13,952.00 I I I I I I ! I I I I I I 10.1 2 ICAB-CHASSIS 1TN DUALREAR WHEELI $15,757.33 1 $120038.00 ! { I I I I I I I I { I I I 11.1 1 ICAB-CHASSIS ITN SOL REAR WHEELI $130082.95 1 $11,803.00 1 ! I I I I I ! ! I I I I ! 12.1 2 ICAB-CHASSIS 1 TON DIESEL I $18,220.23 I $15,869.00 I I { ! I ! I I I I I 1 23.1 1 ICAB-CHASSIS 15000 OVW DIESEL { NIB I NIB I I I I II~~ ! I { I I I I j ~ g I 1 DELIVERY 145-70 DAYS 190-120 DAYS I I I l11 I I I I ! I I I ~04 O f AggndsNo» Apendaltam /C5 DAT EB$[jA_RY1993 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID # 1452 - COLLECTION SERVICES RECOMMENDATION: Council approve award of Bid # 1452 - Collection Services to the low bidder, Collection Express Services at a 286 service fee. SUMMARY: Bid invitations for the collection of unpaid final utility bills, ambulance bills, mowing and demolition services, and other miscellaneous accounts were sent to fifteen (15) vendors. Of the two responses received, Collection Express Services bid the lower service fee of 284. This ai: ount Is to be deducted from the actual monies received by the vendor and the not balance received will be applied to the appropriate receivable account (s). The term of the contract shall be for a one year l period beginning upon approval of the Denton City Council. BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Finance, Utilities, Miscellaneous Accounts Receivable. FISCAL IMPACT: There should be no impact in the form of a payable as a result of s% bid. The monies collected (minus service fee) will be payable to the City of Denton. We estimate total collection of approximately $115,000.00, Collection Express will retain 286 or $32,200.00. Respect lly submitted: Llo d V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by:I Nhmo: Mela iio Harden Title: Buyer proved* y amo: Tom D. Saw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent agenda. 114 I { it Agenda t;!0 AgandaItem,L,)S BID 1 1452 I Ik►9 zA:-_°_7 : L3 / COLLECTION ► HONOR BID NAME Collection Services I EXPRESS I CREDITORS I SERVICES AGENCY OPEN DATE January 5, 1993 I I I _I I DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR Service Fee Based on Recovery only I 29\ 33 1/3\ Expressed as a Percentage f I I ~ ~ I I a 46endsNo. Q~ OD5 Agenda1tem-1~S DA Ise; FEB tYARY- 2 , 1993 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID 01454 - DATA MULTIPLEXER CHANNEL BANK EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATION: We recommend council approve award of this bid to the low - bidder, Fiber Link Supply, Inc. in the total amount of $29,249.44. SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of T1 channel banks which will interface with T1 circuits provided by the local telephone company. This equipment is necessary to provide telemetry to Brazos Electric Power Cooperative and Texas Utilities to comply with a T.M.P.P. technical committee directive. Five proposals were received in response to eight bid packages mailed. BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet, Memorandum from Ray- Well dated January 14, 1993. I FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted funds for Electric Metering account #610-080-0254-9217 with a balance of $98,021.00. Respectfully submitted: L oyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by. iam:e: Denise HerpooL.,-'-Y] Title: Senior Buyer Approved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C. P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent q U.~ganEi { Iii I BID 1 1454 I I 1 I I I ! I I I 1 BID NAME DATA MULTIPLEXER ANIXTER WESCO I FIBER I JETA I GTE I I LINK 1 1NTL 1 OPEN DATE JANUARY 14, 1993 I I I I 1 I k I I _I I t 1aTr{ DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I ^I_I JI I _I I_~_I i. I III CHANNEL BANK AT SPENCER I I I 1 I I I I I I I I lA 1 2 ITWO CHANNEL BANKS I 117,140.00 1 N/B I $6,125.00 1 $6,289.45 I 19 I 1 (ONE CHANNEL SANK WITH TWO 116,870.00 1$6,160.00 I $4,448.00 $8,215.00 1 I I ITL INTERFACES I I 1 I i 1 2. 12 IEXTERNAL/CSU TWO TI'S 112,160.00 111,303.00 1 19E5.CO 1 $1,575.00 12 @ $916.50 3. 1 2 1ADC F16ERMVX CC4461 T1 I $930.00 1$2,160.00 I $1,175.00 1 $1,320.00 12 0 $1256.611 1APPLICATION CARDS I I I 1 I I ' i If.I 1 I I I I I I E 1 I I 1 k 1 I 1. 1 2 111 CHANNEL BANK AT DENTON WESTI$6,998.00 I$B,443.00 $4,237.20 1 $8,450.00 12 @ $6215.341 I It ^ENTON N. WITH INTERNAL CSU I 1 I 1 I ! Tr11 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I A1.1 1FXO 'G .41RE CARDS/TWO 1 0 $376 I1 @ $1,7341 1 @ $378 1 2 @ $475 12 @ $343.69 1 1 (COMMUNICATION PATHS I I I I 1 1 A2.1 1FXS TWO WIRE CARDS/TWO I 1 @ $378 11 @ $1,8361 1 @ $378 IINCL'D 111 11 2 @ $373 IJ 1 (COMMUNICATION PATHS I I I I I I A3.1 14 WIRE ELM FOUR COMMUNICATION 1 2 @ $615 14 @ $1,42814 @ $310.50 1 4 @ $460 1 B @ 1248 1 I IPATH I I I I I I A4.1 1R'-2!2 COMMUNICATION/ONE I I @ 1515 12 @ $1,93812 @ $1,296**I 1 @ $575 12 @ 1451.09 1 I IM i.'7.131CATION PATH I I I I I A5.I 1EXTCRNAL RING GENERATION IF I N/A I N/A I 1 @ $252 11NCL'D It 1.1 N/A I INECESSAAY FOR 12 ! I I I I 1 81.1 1FXO TWO WIRE CARDS/SIX 1 3 4 $378 13 @ 11,7341 3 @ $378 1 6 1 $475 16 0 $343.69 1 1 (COMMUNICATION PATHS I I I I I I B2.1 1FXS TWO WIRE CARDS/StX 1 3 1 $378 13 @ $1,9361 3 @ 1378 IINCL'G IN 5116 1 $300.73 1 1 ICOMMUNICATION PARTS I I I I I I B3.1 14 WIRE ELM/TWO COMMUNICATION 1 1 1 $615 12 1 11,42812 1 $310.50 1 2 1 $460 14 @ $206.46 1 1 (PATHS I I I I I 54.1 IRS-232 COMMUNICATION/TWO I 1 1 $810 14 @ $1,938121 $1,2964**1 2 1 $57S 12 1 $451.09 1 1 COMMUNICATION PATHS I I I I I 85.1 EXTERNAL RING GENERATOR IF I N/A I N/A 1 I 1 $252 IINCL'D it. 31 N/A 1 NECESSARY FOR ITEM 2 I I ! I I I 1 I I I 1 I I ~~Gii 2 i C. 1 AS-422/449 DSO CARDS 1 $477,00 113,264.00 1 $649.00 1 $600.00 1 N/A O { 1 I 1 I" 1@ $324 1 I \ I 11 1 JOR 1@ $234 I#15O0rPEL0HTI f V 1 I I I'•' 1@ $2341 1 I 1 G ~w~p I k I a r M 1 I1 I~ f { agenda No CITY OfDENTONMUNICIPAL UTILITIES/sot-ATexas Street Denton, TX 76201 MEMORANDUM TO: Jim Harder, Director of Electric utilities THRU: Ray D. Wells, superintendent Metering,Communications,Substations FROM: Charles Pierce, communications V DATE: January 14, 1993 SUBJECTa DATA CHANNEL BUNKS BID #1454 After evaluating the bids for Data Channel Bunks we have found Fiber Link Supply, Inc. to be the low bidder. The Coastcom equipment bid is fully compliant to specifications. We recommend the expenditure of $29,249.44. Respondents were as follows: Anixter $33,280.00 Fiber Link $29,249.44 i GTE $38,745.28 Jeffa Internationvl $39,750.00 Wesco $66,448.00 Jkes- e~ierce,~~~ Communications Technician 01143000.RDW Attachment: Low bid from Fiber Link kanda No Agenda DA )t -FEBRUARY-29-1993 2-6 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID # 1457 - 12 CUBIC YARD DUMP TRUCK RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specifications, Barrett White UMC in the amount of $46,590.00, F. 0. B. Denton with delivery in 90 days. SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of a 12 cubic yard dlesal powered dump truck. This unit is a motorpooi replacement for a 1984 Ford 6 cubic yard truck. The new truck a 1993 GMC model C70 will be assigned to the Water Distribution Division of the Water Utility Department. 1 The life to date maintenance cost for the old truck is $26,471.00. This figure does Included some repair of body damage and is not all mechanical. Replacement of this vehicle was approved during the budget process. BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Motorpool and Water/Sewer Division Operations. FISCAL IMPACT: This unit will be funded from motorpool replacement funds and 1990-93 budget funds. Motorpool 720-004-0020-8707 $160956.00 Budget Funds 620-081-0461-9104 $29,634.00 45,590.00 Respec lly submitted: 1. - i L1 d V. Harrell City Manager A roved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent 338.~QenQ~ I BID 1457 1 I I I I I I I I I I I BID NAME 12 CY DUMP TRUCK I MARANAY INTL 1B.ARRETT WHITE ISUMMIT WHITEGMCIMETRO FORD TRK IMETRO FORD TRR ; I GMC I TRUCKS I SALES INC 1 SALES INC I OPEN DATE JANUARY 19, 1993 I 1 1 I I I ' I I I I I 1 1 IQTY} DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR 1 _I~# I _I_ I I I I 1 f I I I I I 1 1. 1 1 112 CUBIC YD TANDEM DIESEL I $47,999.00 ( $46,590.00 I $47,850.00 I $46,695.00 1 $48,495.00 I I (DUMP TRUCK AND BODY I 1 I "$48,999.00 I I I •$46,865.00 I `$48,795.00 I I I I I I I I I I ISTATE WARRANTY I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I ISTATE DELIVERY TIME OF 190-120 DAYS AROI 90 DAYS 190-120 DAYS AROI 60-120 DAYS 1 60-120 DAYS I I ICOMPLETE UNIT I I I I I I I I` ;ALLION BODY I I I "GALLION BODY 1 OGALLION BODY 1 I I I I I I I I i O r I Apsnda No. 93 - a e Agendaitem _ 5. _ llA FEBRUARY 2, 1993 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1458 - REAR LOAD REFUSE TRUCK RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specifications, Davis Truck and Equipment in the amount of $69,208. 00 for a Pakmor Body/GMC chassis combination. SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of a motorpool replacement for a rear loading residential refuse truck. It will replace a 1985 model truck recently removed from the fleet. This replacement was approved during the budget process. The lower prices offered by Southwestern Equipment and Metro Ford on the Goliath II body fail to meet specifications for body side material, cylinder diameters, hydraulic pump and hydraulic pressure. The price offered by Mahanay Intl falls to meet truck specifications for ;'rout axle rating and gross vehicle weight (GVW) requirements. BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Motor Pool and Solid Waste Residential Operations FISCAL, IMPACT: This unit will be funded from Certificate of Obligation Funds. Respec lly submitted: Lio d V. Harrell City Manager Approved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent 337 .,qm0~ it BID / 1456 I I I I I I I I I I I BID NAME REAR LOAD REFUSE TRUCK IMAHANAY INTL I SUMMIT [METRO FORD TRKIMETRO FORD TRKIDAVIS TRUCK I I IWHITEGMC TRUCI I I& EQUIPMENT I OPEN DATE JANUARY 19, 1993 } I I tl I i2 I I I I I I } ! 1 IQTYI DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR _I_I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1. 1 1 IREFUSE TRUCK 1 $68,536.00 { $71,931.00 1 $68,750.00 I $69,495.00 1 $69,208.00 1 I I I i I ! I I I ISTATE WARRANTY 190-120 DAYS [ 120 DAYS 1 60-120 DAYS { 60-120 DAYS I 160 DAYS I I I I I I I I I I ISTATE DELIVERY TIME OF 1 I I I I ! I ICOMPLETE UNIT I I I I I I I~ I I I I I I I I I ITRUCK CAB/CHASSIS1 I I I I I i I I I ! I E ! I }MFU GMC I FORD 1 I GMC 1 I IMODEL I I I LNT 8000 [ I TC7H064 I I (ENGINE I I I 1 I I I (REFUSE BODYi I I I I ! I I I I I ! I } I I [MFG 1 PARMOR 1 MACNEILUS ( GOLIATH II I GOLII.TH II I PAKMOR 1 I IMODEL I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I i O 1 t` 4 W ;'1 V ~ a~ PAGE 2 OF 2 , BID # 1458 I I I j I I I I I INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL BID NAME REAR LOAD REFUSE TRUCK (SOUTHWESTERN I SOUTHWEST I DISPOSAL I DISPOSAL I EQUIPMENT I EQUIPMENT I EQUIPMENT jINT'L TRUCKS I SUPPLY 00 1 SUPPLY CO I SOUTHWEST I SOUTHWEST I OPEN DATE JANUARY 19, 1993 I { I #1 I #2 I it f #2 I I i I_ _I_ I I I i IQTYI DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I _I_I I I I _I { I i ' I I I I I I { I 1. 1 1 IREFUSE TRUCK I $67,831.00 I*CHASSIS ONLYI $69,361.69 1 $70,231.69 { $70,631.00 1{70,995.00 1 I I I I $45,581.00 I ! E I I I ISTATE WARRANTY I 120 DAYS f 90-120 DAYS I 90 DAYS 1120 DAYS ARO I 190-120 DAYSI I I I I I I I I I I ISTATE DELIVERY TIME OF 1 I I I I I I I ICOMPLETE UNIT I I I I I I I j I I f I I I I I I I ITRUCK CAB/CHASSIS$ j I I I I I f I I I I 1 I I I I IHFG I GMC I FORD I GMC I FORD I GMC I I IMODEL I TC7H064 I { I TC7H064 I I I (ENGINE I i I I I I I I i I f I I I I I I IREFUSE BODY$ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IMFO I GOLIATH II 1 1 LOAD MASTER 1 LOAD MASTER I LEACH-BETA ILEACH-BETA I IMODEL I I I I LM 125 EDGE I I I BILL UTTER FORD - NO BID i ~ I W , i i , ApendeNo4 A kAndalte QL Aj J:- D FE AV1lByX 1993 CITY COUNCIL REPORT 1 i TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: RID # 1459 - HICKORY STREET SUBSTATION POWER CIRCUIT BREAKER CONVERSION RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder meeting specification, Powell Industries in the total amount of $148,200.00 1 SUMMARY: This bid is for conversion and rebuilding of eleven (11) Power Circuit Breakers at the Hickory Street Substation. These circuit breakers which were placed in service in 1964 are no longer reliable due to age, sever duty end mechanical degradation. Six bid proposals were received in response to fifteen bid packages mailed. l IF BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet, Memorandum from Ray Wells dated January 21, i 1993. FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted funds for Electric Substations account #611-080-0255- 9217 with a balance of $2,715,416.00. ~ I Respe ully submitted: u c Llo d V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: se Name: ~Denise Herpool Title: Senior Buyer 1 Approved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent 1 a i i BID / 1459 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I ~ BID NAME HICKORY ST SUBSTATION ICIRCUIT BREAKERI MAGNETEK I WESCO I SWITCHGEAR 1 POWELL I LEN T. I + BREAKER CONVERSION 1 SALES I OHIO TRANS I I SYSTEMS I INDUSTRIES IDELONEY CO. I OPEN DATE JANUARY 19, 1993 1 1 I I 1 1 1 _ I I 1 I I I I ~ _ / IQTYI DESCRIPTION 1 VENDOR I VENDOR VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR r" ~ _I_I I I ~ I I f I I I I I 1 I I f 1. 15 IALLIS CHALMERS RUPTAIR I $10,210.00 I $16,079.00 $14,600.00 I $11,200.00 I I :15,538.00 I I IOOWER CIRCUIT BREAKERS I I I I ! 1 I I ITYPE FC-500-A CONVERSION 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I 2. 1 6 IALLIS CHALMERS RUPTAIR 1 $10,210.00 1 $16,079.00 1 $14,600.00 1 $11,200.00 { I $15,538.00 I I 1OOWER CIRCUIT BREAKERS 1 1 f I I I I ITYPE FC-500 CONVERSION I I I I I I I I f I I I I I I I 3. 1 1 ISPARE(BACK-UP) BREAKER PERI $11,210.00 I $23,767.00 1 $20,450.00 1 $16,800.00 I I $15,538.00 1 1PARAGRAPH 2 UNDER GENERAL I I I I I 1 I I ISPECIFICATIONS I I I I *TOTAL OF I I I I I I I ILINE 1,2,3 1 1 DELIVERYt 42-56DAYS 12 WKS 10-12 WKS I $148,200.00 A.R.O. 168 DAYS ARO 12 WEEKS BID / 1459 I 1 I I 1 1 I I I ! I I I BID NAME HICKORY ST SUBSTATION I TECHLINE I PRIESTER 1 CUMMINS I POLELINE I IRBY 00. 1 DEALERS 1 BREAKER CONVERSION 1 INC I SUPPLY 1 SUPPLY I ELECTRIC 1 1 ELECTRIC I OPEN DATE JANUARY 19, 1993 I I I I SUPPLY I I f _I I I I I I k / 1QTY1 DESCRIPTION 1 VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR 1 _I_I I_ _I I I I I I I I I I ! 1 I II 1. 15 IALLIS CHAh 3SR5 RUPTAIR 1 NO BID I NO BID I NO BID I NO SID 1 NO BID 1 NO BID aI I IOOWER CIRCUIT BREAKERS I I I I I f I ITYPE YC-500-A CONVERSION I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 2. 1 6 1ALLIS CHALMERS RUPTAIR 1 NO BID 1 NO BID I NO BID I NO BID ! NO BID I NO BI% rI I I POWER CIRCUIT BREAKERS I I I I I I U "tY (lj 1 I ITYPE FC-500 CONVERSION I I I ( I f I I I i I I I I 1A 3. 1 1 ISPARE(BACK-UP) BREAKER PERI NO BID I P.0 BID I NO BID I NO 810 1 NO BID I NO BID I I 1PARAGRAPH 2 UNDER GENERAL I { I I I I 6\ I (SPECIFICATIONS I I 1 Agenda No 9.~ - O~.S Agenda ljerq-/e~~ CITY of DENTON MUNIClpAL UTILITIES 1 901 •a Texas Street i Denton, Tx 76201 M E M O R A N D U M TO: R. E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities FROM: Ray D. Wells, Superintendent of Electric Metering/Communications & Electronics/Substations DATE: January 21, 1993 SUBJEC EVALUATION OF BID NO #1459 HICKORY STREET SUBSTATION BREAKER CONVERSION. j ~ess~vvs~,paa~~a~ees®smaQeasa~treaeaasz~=qa=a~aaaaem=ay*araesscevae¢ I~ Bids for the above mentioned project were opened January 19, 1993, at 2 P.M. with the following results. Six vendors replied with sealed bids ranging in price from a low of $123,520 to $200,636, for the project. After careful evaluation we have recommended that the bid of Powell Industries in the amount of $148,200 be accepted as low bid meeting and exceeding specifications as issued. 3 The low bid of $123,520, submitted by Circuit Breaker Sales (C.B.S.) of Gainesville, Texas, furnished no technical, or support information with their bid, and we were unable to evaluate their bid for specification compliance. The next low bid submitted by Switchgear Systerns in the amount of $140,000, did not list a date for project implementation nor project completion. We therefore must disqualify these two bids based upon instruction number eleven (11) of the bid invitation titled, "Instruction to Bidders This project is a Capital Improvement Project listed in the fiscal years 1993-1997, Capital Improvements Plan, and identified as Project Number 93-0255.01. This project was estimated to cost $198,000, and has actually come in $50,000 under projected cost. This project is necessary due to the facts that the existing circuit breakers were constructed and placed in service in 1965 (some 28 years ago) and have been subjected to hundreds of operations and high fault current interruptions. These circuit breakers are no longer reliable due to age, severe duty, and mechanical degradation. RDW:pk1 {rI f ~ ~1Ny t•~ 1 1 ~+-+4 HH♦ C I 1• =t t$ ICOUNCIL ?fit +3 f ~I±,:;, 2 } iI z i . L ~o~paoaao b Of D~ Qj a .Y I a ra O~ t MM" a :XMIs O dd d` , p 01, 7 7 U OG tt AUo6jNo _ 3.00 S~ Ajar,da3tem_.~.._S'S g~ Date 2 z.-Q3 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated com- petitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements it. accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has receiv- ed and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works or im- provements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and plans and specifications therein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the following competitive bids for the con- struction of public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invitations", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications on file in the office of the City's Purchasing Agent filed according to the bid number assigned hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as be- ing the lowest responsible bids: BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR OU 1448 DAVID DUFFIED $158,480.00 SECTION ~I. That the acceptance and approval of the above competitive bias shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the bid for construction of such public works or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such 1 person shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice to Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notification of the award of the bid. I SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all necessary written contracts for the performance of the construction of the public works or improvements in accordance with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and Bid Propos- als, and documents relating thereto specifying the terms, condi- f AgendaNc AgeadaItem,Z tions, plans and specifications, standards, quantities and speci- fied sums contained therein. SECTION IV. That upon acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and improvements as authorized herein, the City council here- by authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized contracts executed pursuant thereto. SECTION V. That this ordinanca shall become effective im- mediately upon its passage and approval. i PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1993. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR I ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: { _ 3 -SOS Agenda No ABendaltem~ - D6N6E_FEB4UA. /Rj '2y 19/93 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID it 1448 - REROOF SERVICE CENTER RECOMMENDATION: Council approve award of Bid # 1448 - Reroof Service Center to the low bidder meeting specifications, David Duffield, in the following prices: Base Bid $158,480.00 Remove and Replace Deck $ 12.00 per square foot Remove and Replace Nailers $ 2.75 per linear foot Install Roof Drain $120.00 each Install Drain Line $ 32.00 per linear foot Weekend/ Overtime Per Man $ 8.00 hour SUMMARY: Bids were received on reroofing the Service Center Complex. The existing roof has only a 10 year life exyactancy and is now twelve years old. It is approximately 42,000 square feet and has developed numerous leaks due to poor application and a minimum roof specification. There have been multiple repair attempts on this roof. It has well below the specified amount of asphalt bitumen required for interply adhesion as well as the flood coat. The flashing felts are oxidizing and rotting and ridges and bli .tering are common on the roof surface. BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Service Center Complex. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the 1992-93 budget funds account #610-080- 0250-83010 Utility Administration Building and Equipment Maintenance. Current fund balance is $197,380.49 as of January 26, 1993. Respe lly submitlej: 01 loy . Harrel City Manage, Prepared by: _ N ml~ e: Melable Harden ' Title: Buyer Al roved: Name: Tom D."Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent 1 )J9. agenda I BID i 1448 i I I I I I I I I I I I I I BID NAME REROOF SERVICE CENTER IC.D. MCRAMIEI J 6 J I SUPREME I DAVID I SEYFORTB I STA-DRI CBS I Co. I ROOFING I SYSTEMS I DUFFIELD I ROOFING I CO. 1 ROOFING OPEN DATE JANUARY 140 1993 I { I I I 1 I I I ! I I I IQTY I DESCRIPTION 1 VENDOR { VENDOR j VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR _I 1 I I 1 I I I f_ I I I 1 ! I I I f 1 (BASE BID 1$161,793.00 1$169,740.00 1$208,800.00 1;158,480.00 1;186,874.00 1:193,777.00 1$183,500.00 I I I I I 1 I I 1 ISQ FTIREMOVE G REPLACE DOCK I $4.50 1 $5.00 I $5.00 1 $12.00 1 $8.75 1 $6.75 I $4.25 ' I I I I I I I I f ILN FTIREMOVE 6 REPLACE NAILER( $2.00 1 $2.00 1 $2.00 { $2.75 1 $4.25 1 $3.00 1 $2.30 I I i I I I I I I 1EA (INSTALL ROOF DRAIN j $450.00 1 $750.00 I $600.00 $120.00 1 $1,000.00 1 $1,200.00 1 $500.00 I I I I I I I I I ILN FTIINSTALL DRAIN LINE I $21.00 1 $25.00 1 $17.00 1 $12.00 1 $40.00 I $60.00 ( $10.00 I I I I I I I I I 1MR 1WEEKEND/OVERTIME I $8.00 1 $15.00 1 $15.75 1 $8.00 I $28.00 I $9.97 f $12.00 I I I I I I I I 1 I (BID BOND I YES I YES j YES 1 YES 1 YES I YES I YES I I I I I I I I I J k S ~1 14 I .r x.211 33 +'L I }rI:2 r Lt . t ' -t C ITY~: 2 tCOUNCIL ~i .kI~~IIL _ , ~IIIt I.: ,.II :k t ~ t i t, ~pD00 ' °F c• ~OC~,a ro O$ t 4 O d ~ O h±ifff t ► I ALL00015 ! AQIAd/NO C ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 8 TO A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND MARTIN K. EBY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.; PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE CONTRACT PRICE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on May 15, 1990, the City awarded a contract for the construction of certain improvements to Martin K. Eby Construction 11 Co., Inc, in the amount of $40271,600.00; and WHEREAS, the City Manager having recommended to the Council that a change order be authorized to amend such contract with respect to the scope and price and said change order being in compliance with the requirements of Chapter 252 of the Local Government Code; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION Z. That Change order No. 8 to the contract between the City and Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc., a copy of which is attached hereto, for a total increase of Two Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety and 28/100 Dollars ($2,990.28), is hereby approved and the expenditure of funds therefor is hereby authorized. ' SECTIOII II. That this ordinance shall become effective im- mediately upon it passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this _ day of li 1993. BOB CASTLE BERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY h I BY: i APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: % "GendaNo k~enGaller2,.cQ DAT,, t__FEARUARY 2, 1993 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER #11 MARTIN K. EBY CO. PURCHASE ORDERS 497167 AND #97168 RECOMMENDATION: We recommend change order number eleven (1]) to Martin K. Eby Co, for the eenstructlon of Hydroelectric Projects at Lewisville Lake and Ray Roberts Lake be approved in the amount of $2,990.28. SUMMARY: This change order is for work performed on the bar screen revisions at bot~ its. This change order also closes out this contract at the total amount of $4,370,452.03. The original contract amount was $4,271,600.00. BACKGROUND: Change Order #110 Memorandum to Council dated February 2, 1993 from- R.E. 'Nelson and Jim Harder. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Lewisville and Ray Roberts Hydroelectric Projects. FISCAL, IMPACT: Hydroelectric Utility Bonds Funds. Respec ully submitted: oy V. Harrell CIty Manager Approved: Name: Tom D. Shaw,C.P,M. Title: Purchasing Agent 1 U . epnnd. , B L A C K & V E A T C H 8400 WARD PARKWAY MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. 60K 8405 KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64114 CHANGE ORDER ApenE~item .~5~, C. %t Ie.. CONTRACTOR M. K. Eby Construction Co. CHANGE ORDER NO. /Ic GATE 121.2192 SPECIFICATION NO, 71.0000 CONTRACT FOR Lewisville 6 Pay Robens Hydmelectnc FILE NO. 71.0200 OWNER City of Denton, Texas PROJECT NO, 1056600557 PROJECT tewiwIle & Rey Roberts Hydroelectric r The contract is hereby changed is follows: Dollars Fine' change order for the added penstock bar screen rev5slccs at both sites and tot the agreed upon equipment standby time over Christmas week of 1991. This change order closet cut this contrut. Total change order amount 4 2,990.28 t Approv for BLACK & Vt k Not oddglon of this order 2,890.29 Pravioua total additions to contract 95,161.75 Net total addition to contract 98,862,03 Z2= Original contrac, amount 4,271,600.00 Data 19 G..c Net Conrract Amount 4,370,452.03 NL~~ CA V caner`! j lCoruractorl aY!~'w'S't-' YWl Date LS1901 By ''r Dett 190,7 I { I V AWMO A@erMa1Wk %LL ,G r Wt:--reSruaz;._. Z,. 1991 y•~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TOi MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDER CONTRACT CLOSEOUT WITH CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 8 I WITH ;2,990.28 TO MARTIN R. EBY COMPANY, INC., (EBY) CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR LEWISVILLE AND RAY ROBERTS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECTS. RECOMMENDATIONt The Utilities staff recommends approval of EBY's claim for Change Order 88 for $2,990.28. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: On May 15, 1990, Denton approved the construction contract with EBY in the amount of $4,271,600 for the installation of the turbine and generator units for Lake Lewisville and Lake Ray Roberts hydroel,ctric projects. A listing of previously approved change orders is attached. EBY, in this final claim, is requesting a total increase of $2,990.28 to the contract which included the following: 1. Addition of $1,837.69; The City of Denton, after discussion with Black & Veatch, authorized EBY to do work at Lewisville durin-I startup and commissioning of the unit. work performed was judged to be part of responsibilities for the turbine/generator supplier, DBS. Agreement was reached to withhold $1,837.69 from final contract payment to DBS. 2. Addition of $1,152.59, as requested; In April of 1992, the City of Denton, after discussion with Black and Veatch, authorized EBY to do extra work at Lewisville. The extra work included welding, materials, and labor to repair bar screens due to fish being trapped during testing. A cost breakdown of the requested additional $1,152.09 is attached. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Utilities Department casts for Maintenance and Operations. i Ili r AGeds No . _~~a3 = C4 Apend31t8nt_ rk+te ` FISCAL IMPACT: 15- /Z The revised total contract an,ount shall be $4,370,452 which is 2.3% above the original contract amount ($4,271,600). { Respec ully sub ittted, r ~ v ~ L1 d V. Harrell i r~~l City Manager 1 I Approve By, R. E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities Prepared By, Jim rder Director of Electric Utilities j Attachments: 1 Exhibit 1. Denton's Summary Cost Table Exhibit II. EBY's claim j Exhibit III. Black and Veatch's recommendations 1 01193007.CC r i Agenda No - EXHIBIT I SUMMARY COST TABLE / MARTIN K. EBY CONTRACT FOR LEWISVILLE AND RAY ROBERTS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT ALL CHANGE ORDERS CHANGE ORDER NUMBER (CON) CONTRACT(S) ORIGINAL CONTRACT 4,271,600 CON#lj RR AND LL PAINT DEDUCT, (96,310) BUTTERFLY SPECIFICATIONS, ADDER DUE FERC REQUEST ' CON52, RR WATER LINE EXTENSION AND 12" 102,781 DRAIN LINE CON#31 RR GROUTED RIP-RAP, DELETE FISH 91941 PLATFORM, ADD 60" VALVE CONN4, RR AND LL BATTERIES CHANGE 17,177 CON/5, RR RIP-RAP GROUTING 6,150 CONN6, RR MODIFICATIONS TO SIPRAL CASE, (28.74) SWITCHYARD,AN5 STAIRS) LL MODIFICATION TO THRUST HEARING CON07, REPAIR AT LL. FISH SCREENS DESIGN 56,151.74 MODIFICATION A& RR AND LL. LUBE SYSTEM MODIFICATION AT RR. TESTING AT RR. SOIL EROSION AT LL. DEDUCT FOR AIR SWITCH INSTALLATION. CON18; ITEMS LISTED BELOW: 21990.28 1. ;1,837.69 FROM DBS DURING COMMISSIONING 2. ¢1,152.59 FISH SCREENS REPAIR AT LETPISVILLE TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $4,370,452.00 DISR15 EBYTABB A~enAaltem EeY EXHIBIT II TJ,B% MARTIN K. EBY CONSTRUCTION CO., IN C. GENERAL CONTRACTORS 1500 Brown Tral Bedford. Texas 76D22 a 0 Box 6'0337, Ft Worth, Texas 761620337 l517) 268.0516 • FAX (817) 266.1309 •.A Aa AZ-rift IrO: i_ r ^.M r AN ./F r wlr fry November 11, 1992 A+ C. i BLACH; $ VEATCH i Black & Veatch P.O. Box 8405 NOV 13 1992 Kansas City, Mo 64114 ATTENTION: J.W. Jacks, Jr. I REFERENCE: Lewisville and Ray Roberts Hydroelectric Project BSV Projects 10566 b 10567 Progress Billing No. 21 - Final M.K. Eby Job )'o. 31825-73 Gentlemen: Attached is our Progress Billing No. 21 for period ending October 31, 1992. All contract and current approved change order work is complete and is included in contract amount earned. Please issue f1„ai change order and payment to close the contract. Contact us if you have any questions. Very truly yours, MARTIN K. EB CONSTRUCTION CO.. I4C. 1 , A,G Rieder Project Manager AGR/lal Attachment cc: Joe Cheryl - COD AR File taJk'~ ` r,c,y,r,f tyre„~, MARTIN K, EBY CONSTRUCTION CO,,'INC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS 1500 Drown Tfaa, eadlord, Texas 76022 - P.O. Boa 829337. F1 Worth, Texas 78182-0337 (811) 268.0514 - FAX (817) 26&1307 u~,r ,:.Prrr RqP r_ ref CCVPUr, 41"WiCN CP No wL rlf ) Martin K, Eby Construction Co., Inc, 1500 Brown Trail Bedford, Texas 76022 Progress Billing No, 21 for Period Ending 10/31/92 Lewisville/Ray Roberts Hydroelectric Project 1 83V Project No, 10566 b 10561 Hr K. Eby Construction Job No. 31825 1 r Contract Amount Earned ' :4,370,452,03 i Allowance for Materials Stored a) Project 10566 b) Project 10567 0 Tota) Earnings Tu Date LOSS Retainage '0,370,452,03 ' 0.00 Let's Previous Payments _ Received (Through Billing No, 18) 7 6t ~5 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE - S 2,990.26 U fw~l Oswrrvrrv fT,rn,r AQandl No ApenQr.'bRZ,,E~S. MARTIN K. EBY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS • 1500 BROWN TPAR G.O. BOX 820331 BEDFORD, TEXAS 16102-0331 (a1ii 26a-0614 . FAX (o 1?) 265-0305 •IC4f OC1111 Ibi• 10 NO CCMOANV ` AIrf NfrCN 01 Te, w/rip Aoril 10. 13?2 @l:cr. S veatch p.0. ?3x e40° Kansas City, Mo. 34114 I AT TEN7 1014: W. Ja-►s, r, I FE~n?:iIJ3: ~aW151111? Hy-r0 P!ojet ;CnStOCi parsr-qel, Mr.7•tt;~-i:,: c. M.K. Eby Job No. 318::-113 I Gentlemen: ~1e3!e refer tJ cur let's- Sp.i' c •:0~ j•r? y ^r•.1 m_31r':3t;:n the ex'stlrg c3- sc een +n t~e .e"tsville :e'st: JlC C? Tre wort. Was accemDllshed :y Aorll 19y2. ~tta:ne3 pre c311v '1613 5`eet5 3R: a 1r,aprN -f - " p r'C LL. he amv,.',t tl'6 E+.t rG S 'len a :cntact 'mss if 'SJ ;3 a car IUeStl:ns. Yours truly, MAFTIN K. _5f 4.G, Rt der %r.;ect M3n3,er A,;,, ' a l 1 c:: vO4 4herrt-"COD. Job F1le AGR FI7e M 14W0 00VU 1, iepbp Agapdj No AOer43Ij&n.L'e_S L, Jill I ~ 00 ~l , !il II ~ d ' 1 I I I l Lr- vr~ IL 10 ~ dJ 1 rf ilk II ~ C II ~ it I I d f I It ~ I u - 11 I I ,c 11 it 1 I I - I p I ~ 11 17 E _ r I _ i Ir t 11 1 ~ la_S i I~ I 1: li 7 II I r r + I ~ I+ I; I I/ 1, I IS 19 I I l i l 11 -ill I I 1' i ~ 17 I' fl 711 I N 1 19 fl iI 71 I I I 20 7 2 21 _r - Ir 3 I _ 1 i I ~ ~ ty 29 I ~ I I ~ 21 fll I I rr I' I 751 27 Q 0 0~ I F ~I if r :e 1 I / r ~,j lil li ill !r 7 7) -'1 t 25 to , OP 27 19t 3o I I . - i III ill 1 to 37 30 I - _ I 34 J3 _ - - 31 Cp-•_~ ~0 1 i1 b - I 32 351 37 t 1 36 I 39 I T W f I - - - 36 J~ 4 _ Toil _ I J-- _-11----- - - _ - - . 37 -il- _ 3 I I. 1J9 Agenda No ~4QArdll11t,A_ E: 5 ~J++ rn fl ~YMr . M,4 W Lehr hnM f~M~q . IiN I /N+u FIELD CHARGE l WORK PEAFOItµEp IY EMPLOYEES OF MARTIN K, ERY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. warn, 00 worr ITIM No._L993 ~~p~ D•r. d tell Ord" y/~ / 9 L N•. 60 walk 0,44, Wait 0 r /ri•1 rlnuitN•rt of r•A Y•A•rwwdl worAr. ~tl Olt. ---~~~Na^'1 Cltnf4Anli.q yl3 R Nwn Into T•I•I i J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COUVM(~ Nr~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Drib roil Ara A MArIIIAU Il1lDt - Z,~ ! the "il IIrNA r•r done fee toile Ilnn, If 11111 rpW Avt n•1 ~qn •iln•/. the r. • Apt l r Mbrul. II We 1 U14 In"tN. IranMN r•rA b nU pYgNl let rn, Yon. n•ttl 4A hnync•, . A•nrdih, r n Ar r•brtl wNl.ta rll,►• invoiced M 164 lNl coal rML ruin vii wMI YnA a•r A•N ~ntJ nl Y NY rHl 60 taaiMs whom Tor all Invoice/, w_ I~~1Irfomo fee WOIr DOAIi If MAl11N r. Hy CONIrIUCill at, f0., -INC. SIONID IT 1 "GNro IT biAVaN 1 Nwr 0 r'• rcl raver MiN Iti Gn7 tMi.r Pon. I Agenda Iam FIELD CHAIt Ot ~`''8- ?=1=s WORK PEAFORMEO IY WhOYEES OF ~ / MARTIN K. ElY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. WOIK II lM NOLSrgj`,~~ Dale of W.rl Ordst 4/8/9L No. td We'll Orfa Week 0rdr/ 311"d by Irid 6lcrirNM .f Wok ..Avm.ft 1 / . SwS a / fee ete I WOIKlIIr ' D.I. Near. tWliAuri.d --~'~r NwN I.hl hAl .7 e- ~8 r ~r ECWIrMIN} 1lNTAir Dole TNI Ar 0! 06 y% h MAnuAls uslo, i`73 1 I n e/±c.1 ti's=rnv - ~y,"~ AL /W I ?he "006 ;slid above was dMC In Vs., lion. N M. road hot 40, loon COMA, the r61 w.1 l /1 N pacer yoot Inlnn/l. U this we'll it 01 gpood loo, JA" 0,06094 motif/ w I morn .~.R. ?,q rrUl be 4A.9116: M Com L/Nd, fMO /ewoo d ■ n Rho rlw/ ".Is of this ~i` t, A►r;wlb Lon, Imwnna, Idn 1 lowl"t. .M h .Rohl is lilt 4441,11", omd pnIIN w 4l 1. N li dad r,MOe too nn Mr.11N. Wod hAorwrN Nr WORK DOW IY MA111N K, EIY CONITIUCnON CO., INC. LONI O Ili mrrMr+N/ Irlrs+rwrr Llvvrr,ti p 0 Houu of rool..nd rnr..d.d l7tNn/r+...,.. COUNTER RECEIPT D[:PITI7N TOOL F!'dI ECNE'R I I „ h If7171 W. UNIVERSITY DENTON TX 7L^^01 MARTIN K IiAY h34834 04/03/1 r 0 BOX D.;0.337 1E t FORT WORTII TX 761111 A196195 002920 :245 7 iR rNAr?Or. } f~ ! i NET 34'Di1YG 1 r 111411 1 ' ' r 1 /UnJ0-'1r)1b2 4.12 CA ,4.11 119 .TNown DRILL DIT 1 /r.D+'fF1'2 1.97 CA 1.94 CI !I h ~!I!I" DULI.f.T DF:1LL 917 1 i UA:6!+I'71; t f14 EA 7.6E tl A + 1!'?/'~/1A K 7/17-A24N PEPREf18E11 Cr-.14TfiR WE I /11f`7'~lC' 4.39 EA 4.35 sr,vo,ow 1/1 07 : WG RICH COLD 0ALVANIZINO J C,rr:T ON F1I_F. 14.16 Nry RETUpfI9 of 7rl. 3S+ PAYS 1'IIIf~ lir+:C1'7'f hUrsT Ar(OMPANY ANY I~rTLIRrI Z4, QI) 0. Acclplud e,x JCUSTOMER 14. 16 f•1Mt1 pi Yr••r N1 tMY 4N.t rWtl ~aV/R7C!IQII ( FIELD CHAR01 WORK PERFORMEo IY EMPLOYEES OF 1 MARTIN K. Eby CONSTRUCTION CO, INC. ~ 1 / WOIK IIIM N0.-.,(_q Iaol D.Ir.1 4.1 WrA Orhr Wrk 0•Lr _ No. of W[h Ontu IhnN Y/ ~ Idd IuedrK.n .f rlh r.Mnndi x ~ ) ! - ' ~ WOIKIIfi I Date Name clNtifitrll.n y~9 /7 i ~L Nr.=n 1.1. hr.l y y1g kald - ~2.y0:3;' i 1011/MINT IIN1Air'_-`_ _r ~Crg Trrl `1-t___-----t ky/ 8 1 rte r y'c r inr rrA op to .Nn ra 4n. fir t.v firm. If M. r.rnf la nH ►un [i1nU, he rrri rN Mnr ~r...u d nrlpt 3 38r A►►r.G/.VY.Ir. a too". $ Mhinl. If this We'll !t na y/r.../ by /r.. r4rus r.Ilf/ by t.ntrn real. Tr. will 14 In.. it, 0,1 IMIal. d No rrtrd, . Mt[rnntr, Flimsy Im60 .nf ....hra end ' M.ttl o rn Trr Irrldt will to 040.t he. 11410 41P* !tdillt Hr WOIK 10NI IY _ MANUM K. LIT CONRIUCTIT7N CO., INC. SIGNID IY ~.hur .Yrrt+wmt 1.11117 All 13-1800068 04-04-92 07-4300130 so x 63 x 00,00 0 '0910 0 •7684t1 -60011 ~9~d5n 9 x ~0o10 i *0090t1 4005611 07.764 D> C O C 31~ - O r W-f v i ~v ~Pe EX IT III 11 ~~3 ~4pendaNol_~ QT BLACK & VEATCH AOandal 10~ C 9430'V7nrd Parkway, PO Bo. No 8405, Kans n GN, ~rnso„r, 64114, 9131339 2000 City of Denton Lewisville Hydroelectric Project B&V Protect 10 8&Y f11e 11.0000 00 November 23, 1992 i City of Denton i 901-A Texas Street 1 Centon, Texas 76201 Subject: Approval of Eby Billing No. 21 Attention: Mr, Joe Cherri Gentlemen: We have reviewed Eby's Progress Billing No. 21 for period ending October 31, 1992 (copy attached) for the amount of $2,990,28. Black & Veatch agrees with the amount requested and recommends the City make payment to Eby for the amount. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments. i i Very truly yours, BLACK & VEATCN John R. Hollenbeck Enclosures I 1 {51~ CITY 11 Mf € { COUNCIL t': f ITUM i of anti ti r c c s o° e e • Guu :r ORDINANCE NO. A9W+No -AOe►~ilterr~ AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF F;~~-' ?'1_ 9E PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVtCESRIN RCCCpp 72-1- DATE. ANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASE3 FROMREQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE WHEREAS, state law and ordinance requite that certain contracts requiring an expenditure or payment by the City in an amount ex- ceeding $10,000 be by competitive bids, except in the case of pub- lic calamity where it becomes necessary to act at once to appro- priate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to pre- serve the property of the city, or it is necessary to protect the public health or safety of the citizens of the city, or in case of unforeseen damage to public property, machinery or equipment; and, WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended to the City Council that it is necessary to purchase goods or services due to the fol- l owing emergency conditions outlined in the memorandum attached hereto as THEREFORE, Exhibit "A", incorporated herein by reference; NOW, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS; SECTION I. That the City Council hereby determines that there is a pubes calamity that makes it necessary to act at once to ap- propriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to pfeteeve the p oofrthe of the city, or to protect thb public health public property, machinery city, eqr ofp'~ ~ a me t, and for reason thereof, damage he following emergent by reason thereof, the y purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services, as described in the "Purchase Orders" attached hereto, are hereby approved: PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT 32132 A.I.S. CONTINENTAL $10,i196.76 i SECTION II. That because of such emergency, the City Manager or designated employee is hereby authorized to purchase the mater- ials, eyuipment, supplies or services as described in the attached Purchase Orders and to make payment therefore In the amounts there- in stated, such emergency purchases being in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases by the City from the requirements of competitive bids. SECTION III, That this ordinance shall become effective im- mediately upon its passage and approval. Apand#No Agendalio~ rL~S~~ rye i PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1992, BOB CASTLEBERRYt MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: f I i ~I { ^pendi No r ends) kS A°' - Z) DAT FEB f Spy _ CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: L;'oyd V. liarrell, City Manager SUBJECT: EMERGENCY PURCHASE -A. 1. S. CONTINENTAL PURCHASE ORDER PC # 32132 - RECOMMENDATION: Council approve payment to A.I.S. Continental in the amount of 10,896.76 for purchase order PC #32132. SPRY, This purchase request for repair parts has been upgraded an emergency as of last week. The machine is no longer operabland is needed ve to badly to satisfactorily complete the refuse disposal process at the landfill. There is no backup equipment available to replace this track loader when it is out of service. The unit is a 1989 Komatsu Loader purchased April 6, 1989 at a cost of $195, 924.60. BACKGROUND: A.I.S. Continental PC #32132, Memorandum fmm Jack Jarvis, Fleet Superintendent. 11 PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Fl-9t Services, Solid Waste. FISCAL. IMPACT: Payment to be made from account 0710-025- 583-6'702 which has a balance in the amount of $288,948.71 as of January 27, 1993. Respectfully subm.1tted: I 01 4105V-4 ewel City Manager Prepared by: Name: Mel n e Harden Title: Buyer Approved: f me: Tom D. Shatw, C.P,M, Title: Purchasing Agent ~ ]~3.ep~nda L; Y . 19~? J!.'i~,~endalF~a' 1' 25 3 -nom Aganda Ifeft k ~p CITY Of DENTnN, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 115 E. McKINNEY ! DENTON, 7FXA 6101 H E H O R A N D U H To. Melanie Hardin, Buyer, Purchasing Department FROM: Jack Jarvis, Fleet Superintendent DATE. January 13, 1993 SUBJECT: UNIT 2500, EQUIPMENT IDf18942, KOMATSU TRACK FRONT END LOADER LOCATED AT CITY OF DENTO.N LANDFILL S/N 15723 Attached is a purchase req+test for parts to repair the undercarriage of the Komuteu Loader at the landfill. We have been quoted the price of $10,896.76 for the parts needed to make this repair. Parts would be obtained from A.I.S. Continental who was the original supplier of the equipment. This equipment was purchased from A.I.S Continental on April 06, 1989. Until repairs can be made this unit is out of operation. t ,7_ ck arvie- 1171566.8200 DIFW METRO 4342529 THIS IS A U1 Y Of VEIVIUN, 1EXAS CONFIRMING ORDER I PURCHASE ORDER NO: PC 32132 rz~ (IF MARKED) I This number must appear on all invoices, deliver slips, cases. l D NOT DUPLICATE clns, boxes, packing slips and blis. Bid No Date 01 15 93 Pale No. u 1 a} VEI 0 t PURCHASING DIVISION190187E XASSTREET/OENTON,TEXAS76201 II E A.I9S9 CONTINENTAL 817/38371000FiVMETR0877i2670042 FAXSII13824692 0505 S• C-ENTRAL EXPRESSWAY CONFIRMATION ONLY C14 4 RilY DEUVERY FLEET SERVICES 0 ,DALLAS TX 75239 ADDRESS 8J4 TEXAS DENTON9 TX 76201 I. VENDORNO. AAA54500, DELIVERY QUOTED 01 21 93 FOB DESTINATION TERMS D1 149000 EA ENDOR CATS 0 N / A MFG NAME 329810 459s34 CITY 0 06074 2500 TEET11 02 4.000 EA ENDOR CAT• 0 N / A MFG NAME 25.280 101.12 CITY M 06074 7 1100 :TEETH 03 50.000 EA VENDOR CAT. 0 N / A MFG NAME 1+110 5.019511 CITY 0 06074 2500'SOLT 04 50.000 EA VENDOR CAT* 0 N / A MPG NAME 09830 4106U CITY 0 06074 2500 NUT 05 89000 EA VENDOR CAT. 0 N / A MFG NAME 257.910 29063.28 CITY 0 06074 2 600 . R OLLE R 06 69000 EA VENDOR CAT* 0 N / A MFG NAME 2659980 19595988 CITY 0 06074 2500.ROLLER 07 1.000 to VENDOR CAT* 0 N / A MFG NAME 69680.140 6p580914 CITY 0 06074 2500 .TRACK LINE ASSEMBLY PAGE TOTAL It 106896976 RAND TOTAL It 109896976 1 710 025 0583 8702 109896.76 VENDOR INSTRUCTCNS: 3 Terns - Nei 30 lows otrrrwwe smile i t Send original Irnioic9 wish ftA ate copy 4 Shipping Insiructions, FO8 Destinarion prepaid tunes wwwise spec'wat 2 Bill to - Accounts Payable 5 14o federal of '.late sates tax shall be Irickxled 215 E. McKinney St. in vices bilkv 1. F1.rnelnn I'7FIInn CITY COUNCIL uu: I'l OF Do M L 1 ~ O t f Q 0 0 It, ITT: M.1 ITT, (Alt ~2- 2-93 Ar i CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT DATE: January 12, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council r FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Ray Roberts 36" Transmission Water Line Project -ijl'~ECOMMENDATION: Approve ordinance authorizing payment of $25,000.00 to Charles Betzel. SUMMARY: The subject easement is described in one tract. A 2.4134 acre tract on the north of Sherman Drive. BACKGROUND: The City of Denton, Utility Department, Water/Wastewator Division, will be constructing a water treatment plant at Lake Ray Roberts and a booster pump and water storage facility on the north side of Hartlee Field Road sometime in the future. A 36" transmission ' water line to connect these facilities will be located along Sherman Drive {F.M. 428), F.M. 2153 and Burger Road. ' PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS,<C~R GItOITP AFFECTED. Utility Department - Water Wastewater Division. FI_~ AL_ IMPAC'P: 1991 Bond Fund - Capital Improvement Program - Ray Roberts 36" Transmission Water Line expenditure. Present acquisition is recommended due to low land values and easements are necessary ' before construction of waterline is initiated. 1OH071.wp Ageha21taq. /c~J SS ORDINANCE NO. 1 , AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF A UTILITY EASEMENT FROM CHARLES BETZEL; AUTHORIZING EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE. CITY OF DENTON HE:REB. ORDAINS: j SECTION I. That the City Council authorizes the acquisition of the easement described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto, from Charles Betzel. .TION I That the Council authorizes the expenditure of i funds in the amount of Twenty-five Thousand and no/100 Dollars j ($25,000.00) for the purchase of said property. SECTIONIII. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1993. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR I I ATTEST: JENNIFER 14ALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: J ~ V_ r ALL001E0\1425.3.6 UTILITY EASEMENT Tha-c Charles Betzel, (Grantor), in consideration of the payment of Twenty Five Thousand-and oLU00 Dollars ($25,000.00) by the CITY OF DEN'iON, Texas, (City), a municipal corporation of the State of Texas, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grants and conveys { to the City a permanent easement for water, sanitary sewer, electric and stormwater drainage pipes, lines, and facilities across the real property owned by Grantor, as described in Exhibit "A", attached to and incorporated into this document by reference. The grant made includes and is subject to the following: 1. Purpose. This easement grants to the City the right to I construct, install, reconstruct, repair, relocate, operate, and maintain water, sanitary sewer, and stormwater pipelines, valves, facilities and appurtenances, electric poles, wires and related facilities, and other public utilities and related facilities in, I! on, over, under and across the permanent easement. 2. Temporary Construction Easement. In addition to the per- manent easement, the City is granted a temporary construction ease- ment for the initial construction only of one water transmission pipeline. The temporary constructioni easement shall be twenty (20) feet in width and shall extend parallel to the permanent easement, all as shown in Exhibit A. Upon conclusion of, the initial con- struction, the temporary construction easement shall terminate and the City shall remove all debris, surplus material, and construc- tion equipment and leave the property substantially equal in appearance to the condition existing prior to construction, except for any trees or shrubs removed. 3. Building and Structures. Grantor shall not construct, erect or place any buildings, signs, or other permanent structures, or portions thereof, in, on, or over the easement. The City will re- place or repair any sidewalk, parking lot, or driveway that exists on the easement on the date of execution of this instrument if re- moved or damaged by the city during initial construction of the water transmission line. If the Grantor constructs or places a building, sign, parking lot, driveway, private walkway or other structures or improvements over the easement after execution of this easement document, the City nay remove all or part of the structures or improvements as necessary to construct, reconstruct, replace, repair, alter, relocate, operate or otherwise exerciso its rights herein without any obligation to replace or repair the structures or improvements and without. any liability to Grantor, including the obligation to make further payment to Grantor. h 4. Fences and Gates. If necessary to remove or relocate any fence or gate during initial construction of the water transmission lisle, the City will remove or relocate the fence or gate at its expense. After completion of the initial construction, the City shall reinstall any fence or gates initially removed or relocated in their original locations. The Grantor, but not the City, may construct new fences and gates on the easement after the date of this instrument but the fences and gates shall be placed substan- tially perpendicular to the easement. Any fences placed across the easement shall contain gates or removable panels so that the ease- ment is readily accessible by the City's employees and agents at all times. If gates are to be kept locked by Grantor, the City shall be provided the keys or other means, as applicable, so the City may open all locks for access without prior notice to Grantor. I 5. Access. For purposes of exercising its rights, the City shall have access to the easement by way of existing public pro- perty or right-of-way and not from other lands owned by Grantor outside the easement. 6. Trees and Landscaping. Grantor shall not plant any tree upon the easement property. City may cut, trim, or completely remove any trees or portions of trees now or hereafter located within the easement without liability to Grantor, including the obligation to make further payment to Grantor. Grantor may plant shrubs, vines, grass, irrigation systems and other systems land- scape features within the easement, but the city may remove all or part of any shrubs, vines, grass, or other landscape features as is necessary to construct, reconstruct, replace, repair, alter, relo- cate, or operate its utilities without any liability to Grantor, including the obligation to make further payment to Grantor. 7. Crops. The payment herein made includes any damage or loss to crops sustained in the future by Grantor rerulting from the city's construction, reconstruction, repair, replacement, or other use of the easement for the purposes granted. 8. Grantor's Rights. Grantor shall have the right to make use of the easement for any purpose that does not interfere with the , City's rights in the easement for the purpose granted, subject to the restrictions contained herein. 9. Neither party has made any representations or promises out- side the written provisions of this easement document relating to the uubject matter of this easement document. Page 2 I 1 Agendalterr je-' N~d _ a a 7 10. Successors and Assigns. This grant shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the parties and their heirs, sac.cessors, and assigns. SIGNED this day of 1992. Grantor Charles Betzel I I SUBSCRIBE AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME, by Charle6 Betzel this the day of - W&J,~ 1992. PAOBE'fl N. YMILfONSON L~:~i~ o y Public, State of Texas ~ Accepted this day of 19 for the City of Denton, Texas (Resolution no. 91-073) BY: Roger N. Wilkinson 1I Right-of-Way AgenL Ji 1 Grantees address: , City of Denton 215 E. McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 AEE00017/6 Page 3 I AQendaNo EXHIBIT •A• ABendalterrLN3~...~~- ALL that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land situated in Ngton-Coounty~ f~ Texas in the F. O'leary Survey A-977, the J. Thomas Survey A-124U and the S. Lamar Survey A-761 and being a part of a tract shown by deed to Charles A. Betxel recorded in Volume 1211, Page 729 Deed Records and Volume 1211, Page 722 Deed Records and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point where the northwest right-of-way of F.M. 428 intersects the west lire of the tract recorded in Volume 1211, Page 729 Deed Records. THENCE north 20 18' 500 east with the west line of said tract 73.18 feet; j THENCE north 450 24' 30, east a distance of 405.59 feed THENCE north 450 27' 060 east a distance of 1,695.41 feet; THENCE south 00 34' 281 west a distance of 70.86 feet to a point in the northwesterly right-of-way of F.M. 428; THENCE south 450 27' 061 Wert with said right-of-way 1,645.18 feet; THENCE south 450 24' 30• west with said right-of-way 459.01 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 2.4134 acres of land, also reserved is a 20 feet wide construction easement along the entire northwest line of the above easement. 1008E/6 I , 50 20• Ageoda6~_. G Owner ESmi E mat Agendaltem 19 pen►) lacreel 7 1. City Booster Plant Slte N/A N/A 13 17 S - 2. Schaffer 13 Burger Rd. 3. Ashcraf t 4, F1 Service industries 92s4a 37019 12 5. State Hwy. Permit N N/A NIA 18 6. Reid LL x.1163 e465 16 7. County Road Permit N/A N/A 8. d^/,k.Jots>.J .2006 .1154 15 14 9. Sauls 55056 2.2023 10,,"ZOl ~ z.<1'~4' 9ea~ 13 11. Whitlock 1.2944 .5197 7f 12. Mckemey 4.2163 1,6873 Sheppard Rd 13. Craver (Denny) James 10.9631 43614 it 12 I FM 428 14. Hemphill House 1.7173 .6869 15. Bridges-Hemphill .3200 .1260 16. Bryson .7520 13000 17. Allen 1.00so .4380 9 18. McSween .3481 1392 ; 19. City Water Plant Site N/A N/A Houma Totals w 28x1 18,1127 7 -8 6 Elm, Bottom Circle + 40'Access 8 Utility Easement ~3 Clear Creek 'L. 7raicel-rw sous 36' Water Line / How ~ CS 4 c ~ao ru...ra d,i. ~~ar CMIII YOM erIFL 1 2 Hartlef, Field Rd. z 36" Transmission Water line ~e~ Easement Alignment I A Irv • ul.r,r6, a ` ~ •Ii i1 J' 1 ~ ~ tS r ~ • 21.00Qe f IA1,ot4• ,taxi lira' cm Ac a I • flrl.r uat.•.' ? 111roz Ac - „ . ~l 1161 IL 6.7 ~x 71 1r •N•• i !•..rr 1 ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ arftr• ~ ) N I` 1 a '64, • i.r•Af 14r►a • • • © O ' t 1 rs,nlie i • i~ 1 : ••ff •a ♦I : ? Ii.A1f AA . n ira • t~4.50 Ac ~ G ~ H • 1 1••1.1 rte- I 11 it • 1r.•lf Ar . 'I CIL INItM 1 +~F+~, ' nr' . ~ ~ ~ t J,•rir rl l ?fir ar t, r r.e•,. f.ur, • . +,urr• 1 ! •r /tu lout l!,Hr 'III/,1 sr gln4 uer~a 1•.161 :1 H•JAa : i h♦` I , 2991' Hale trio' r M r 496,1' 0 ua,u' rrrt. rJ~ ~ ~ ,..ilk ~1~.T1~• „ +na F. E. GAULS - •y M q 104A4 Iall. ach N ire, to oW ~ 1 Na • r ' r ~ t Cr:A2t.ES A. 6.TastfA.t,Mr = Id. j H !I 61' V. vl n.t,sA• I A977 • H ~ 1.1•' t1...9 a ,i• pi f ; 1 'a Ja • ~ ILa1lal IM• 2.T • il~l17 acs ~ _ _ h I I 4t 1 l22 y1L ♦ , l~ jir} ~ f ttI j1Z ~I Ii fC I T Y r rCOUNCIL I t LMTT~ hr° - MI: C 0 41. I°M' t~OQ~V ~~Q' GG O(A :T: TX 11~' agenda No _4~ Agenda item, ± Suf. ~kta ..._Z• Z,•Q3 DATE: February 2, 1993 61 9111 COUNCIL REPORT TO., Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Sign Ordinance Amendment and Sign Fee Ordinance RECOMMElIVATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. i Summpy: An ordinance amends Chapter 33, Signs, of the Coda of Ordi- nances concerning altering non-conforming signs, abandoned signs and supporting structures, calculating sign effective area, special sign districts, monument signs, wind devices, temporary and stake signs, measuring the height of signs on I-35, flags, separation of signs on a premises, and rewords a ` number of provisions for legal bnd clarification purposes. A separate fee ordinance on your agenda establi7hes fees for certain signs. Another ordinance amending the zoning ordinance with respect to signs in planned development districts will be on your February 16th agenda. IJACKGROUND: Since May 1992, the Planning and Zoning Commission has held seven public hearings and two separate work sessions and the City Council has held one public hearing and three separate work sessions. PROGRAMS, DE4ARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Ever;'one who sees Denton. FISCAL IMPACTS None. AgeidsIlem _ S '2LZL nom' Respectfully submitted; l Llo. d V. Harrell, ity Manager Prepared by: Frank H. Robbins AICP Executive Director Planning and Development i ATTACHMENTS; Draft ordinances. I ~x~ooaei I ALL0004.WP5 endlNa. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING THE FEES FOR SIGN PERMITS TO PROVIDE FOR A FEE FOR SIGNS LARGER THAN TWO HUNDRED FIFTY (250) SQUARE FEET, FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION PETITIONS, AND FOR WIND DEVICES ERECTED ACROSS STREETS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE r DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: i SECTI0A1 j. That the following fees are hereby authorized to be imposed pursuant to Section 33-64 of Chapter 33 entitled "Advertising Devices" of the Code of Ordinances. (a) $75.00 for a permit for a sign larger than two hundred I fifty (250) square feet; (b) $50.00 for a special exception petition; and (c) $60.00 for a permit for a wind device to to erected across the street. SECTION IZ. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. 1993PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of . BQH CASTLEHERRY,MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY I I j . r ' 1r to ~ ~ ~ ~ # ~ • ~'1+jt~ c#• ti~z .~z.rtt TitUNCIL 111 k~ p~p1300 o} afQ1 4 H ~ f ° 0 ~ r° H• r ~ 40V' k r~t1 f J 1 {r { I 0lNo _ 0/05 A4aWjlt.mr....._ ~ e_ 2.1:. ~J~ COTYofDBNTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL SVILDING / 215E MCKINNEY / DENTON. TEXAS 76201 r MEMORANDUM E i DATE: January 29, 1993 I TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager L/ FROM: John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance SUBJECT: GENERAL OBLIGATION/REVENUE BOND SALE The General Obligation Bonds will be issued for two purposes: The Library and the new Law Enforcement Center. Of the total sale, the Law Enforcement Center will use $2.4 millon for improvements to the Denton Municipal Complex. This is part of the 1992^93 Capital Improvements 21an. City Council has previously given the go ahead to issue $600,000 for use at the Branch Library. This project was originally to be funded out of the 1994-95 Capital Improvements Program, but will be moved to 1992-93 at Council's direction. The $6.5 million worth of Revenue Bonds are for use in the utilities program. They will provide for two year's of Capital Improvement Projects necessary for improvements to the utility systeim. The additional amount of the sale is for issuance costs associated with the sale. Should you need any additional information, or have further questions, please advise. .1FMC0iaf AFF004CI V71666-8200 7/566.8200 DIFW METRO 434.2529 %de CERTIFICATE FOR ORDINANCE DIRECTING THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CITY OF DENTON UTILITY SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, { AND DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE AND PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF SALE THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON ; CITY OF DENTON We, the undersigned officers of said city, hereby cortify are follows: 1. The City Council of said City convened in REGULAR MEETING ON THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1993, at the Municipal Building (City Hall), and the roll was called of the duly constituted officers and members of said city Council, to-wit: Jennifer K. Walters, Bob Castleberry, Mayor City Secretary Jane Hopkins, Mayor Pro Tam Harold Parry Euline Brock Margaret Smith Jack Miller Mark Chow and all of said persons were present, except the following absentees: thus constitut ng a quorum, whereupon, among other bu2_T_nQsa,~ the following was transacted at said Meeting: a written ORDINANCE DIRECTING THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CITY OF DENTON UTILITY SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, AND DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE AND PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF $ALF OF SAID BONDS was duly introduced for the consideration of said city cuuncil and duly read. it was then duly moved and seconded that said ordinance be passedt and, after due discussion, said notion, carrying with it the passage of said ordinance, prevailed and carried by the following votes AYES: NOES I ABSENTIONS: 2. That a true, full, and correct copy of the aforesaid Ordinance passed at the Meeting described in the above and foregoing paragraph is attached to and follows this v I v / 1f I Certificate, that said ordinance has been duly recorded in said City Councils minutes of said Meotirigj that the above and foregoing paragraph is a true, full, and correct excerpt from said City council-es minutes of said Meeting pertaining to the passage of said Ordinance, that the persons named in the above and foregoing paragraph are the duly chosen, qualified, and acting officers and members of said City Council as indicated therein; and that each of the officers and members of said city Council was duly and sufficiently notified officially and per- sonally, in advance, of the time, place, and purpose of the aforesaid Meeting, and that said Ordinance would be introduced and considered for passage at said Meeting, and that said Meeting wan open to the public, and public notice of the time, place, and purpose of said meeting was given, a12 as required by Vernon's Ann. Tex. Civ. St. Article 6252-17, 3. That the Mayor of said City has approved, and hereby I SapProvost Ofe saaforesaid id City have ordinancel that duly signed t said Mayor and ordinancel;e and y that the Mayor and the City secretary of said City hereby declare that their signing'of this Certificate shall constitute the signing of the attached and fallowing copy of said ordi- nance for all purposes. SIGNED AND SEALED as of the 2nd day of February, 1993, euretary V- Nay'or (SEAL) and they Bothe nd Attor *ys oafthe being City p of t Denton, Tawast hereby y certify that we prepared and approved as to legality the attached and following Ordinance prior to its passage as aforesaid, r~ 'Clip Attorne - y eon~Attornepg i i~r9l llenl. !'.Zc ORDINANCE DIRECTING THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TODIDSISUERECT CINGTY TH OFEDENTOSUANNC'EUTILITY SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, AN TS AND PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS ' COUNTY OF DENTON CITY OF DENTON , WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, deems it necessary and alviuable that the bonds hereinafter described be authorised, issued, sold, and delivered. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON ORDAINSi Section 1, That the City Secretary is directed to cause the following notice to be published in the "Denton Record- Chronicle", which is a newapaper published in, and having general circulation in the City of Denton, on the same day of each of two consecutive weeks, with the date of the first publication to be on or before March 1, 19931 being at least fifteen (15 days) prior to the date upon which th3 City Council intends to pass the ordinance described in the following notices "NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CITY OF DENTON UTILITY SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1993 Notice is hereby given, in accordance with Article 2368a, Vernon's Annotated Texas civil Statutes, that the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, intends to pass, at a Regular Meeting to be hold commencing at 7100 p,m,p on March 16, 1993, at the Municipal Building (City Hall), an ordinance authorizing the issuance, sale, and delivery of an issue of bonds, to be evidenced initially by a single fully registered bond payable in installments, but convertible into definitive bonds in multiples oT $5,000, to be designated as "City of Denton Utility System Revenue Sonds, Series 19930, e ax principal amount of $6,575,000, to be securedib tand°1ayabl from a first lien on and pledge of the "Pledged Revenueso which 'OPlodged Revenuesil include initially the "Not Revenuespi of "System+o, with said "System,' initially consisting of the city's entire existing combined waterworks, sanitary sower, and electric light and power system, ell as will be defined and pprovided in the aforesaid Ordinance. Said bonds will boar interest from their date at maximum rates not to exceed fiftann porcentum per annum, will be scheduled to mature sorially in Installments within a maximum of not to exceed thirty years from their date, and will be subject to redemption prior to maturity, and will have such other and further characteristics, as will be provided in the aforesaid Ordinance. Said bonds will be authorized, issued, sold and delivered pursuant to Articles 111lb, 11120 1113, and 11141 Vernon's Annotated Texas Civil Statutes, and other applicable laws, for the purpose of obtaining money for improvements and extensions of the afore- said "System". CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS" Section 2. That the City Secretary is directed to issue a Notice of Sale of Bonds in substantially the following form: OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS UTILITY SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, I SERIES 1993 The City Council of the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, will receive sealed bids At the Municipal Building (City Hall), 215 E. McKinney Street, in the City of Denton untilt 7100 p.m., Tuesday, March 16, 1993 for the purchase oft B6•M5,000 Utility Systgm Revenue J1pds. series JWp to be dated March 1, 1993, and to mature serially December 1 each year 1994 through 2013. Sealed bids, plainly marked "Sid for Bonds", should be addressed to "Honorable Mayor and City Council, City of Denton, Texaa", and must be submitted on the f'Offioial Bid Form" to be made available by the City council prior the date of sale. All sealed bids will be publicly opened and tabu- lated before the Council. Copioa of the *Official Statement", "Notice of Sale", and "Official Did Form" are being prepared and will be mailed to prospective bidders on or about March 1, 19911 and wilt be furnished to any prospective bidder upon request, by First Southwest Company, 500 First City Center, 1700 pacific Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75201, Financial Advisors to the City. y The City reserves the right to reject: any and all bids and to waive any and all irre gularities. ~ TeByxas, order of the City Council of the City of Denton, I JENNIFER K. WALTERS ~ City Secretary City of Denton, Texas. Said Notice shall be published once in The Bond Buyer, New York, New York, which is a national publication regularly and primarily carrying financial news and municipal bond sale notieeut and said Notice also shall be published once i "Denton Record-Chronicle", which has been designated as thae official newspaper of the City of Denton. Said publications shall be mads at least thirty days prior to the day set for receiving bids. •.----r-.rrr-.-rrr--r.-r-r.......... { ICI F7enda1!am 5._~. NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CITY OF DENTON UTILITY SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1993 Notice is hereby given, in accordance with Article 2360a, Vernon's Annotated Texas civil Statutes, that the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, intends to pass, at a Regular meting to be held commencing at 7:00 p.m., on March 160 1993, at the Municipal Building (City Hall), an ordinance authorizing tho issuance, sale, and delivery of an issue of bonds, to be evidenced initially by a singly fully registered bond payable in installments, but convertible into definitive bonds in multiples of $50000, to be designated as "city of Denton Utility System Revenuo Bonds, Series 1993", in the maximum principal amount of $60575,000, to be secured by and payable from a first lien on and pledge of the "Pledged Revenues", which "Pledged Revenues" include initially the "Net Revenues" of the "system", with said "System" initially consisting of the city's entire existing combined waterworks, eanitary sewer, and electric light and power system, all as will be defined and provided in the aforesaid Ordinance. Said bonds will bear interest from their date at maximum rates not to exceed fifteen pereentum per annum, will be schad- uled to mature serially in installments within a maximum of not to exceed thirty years from their date, and will be subject to redemption prior to maturity, and will have such othor and further characteristics, as will be pro- f vided in the aforesaid Ordinance. Said bonds will be authorized, issued, sold and delivered pursuant to Arti- cles 1111b, 1112, 1113, and 1114, Vernon0s Annotated Texas civil Statutes, and other applicable laws, for the purpose of obtaining money for improvements and extensions of the aforesaid "System". CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i eel f ~ ¢,F~CIAG IiOT~CE 0~'~A,~ CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS UTILITY SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1993 The City Council of the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, will receive sealed bids at the Municipal Building (City Hall), 215 E. McKinney Street, in the City of Denton until: 7:00 p.m., Tuesday, March 16, 1993 for the purchase of: 56.575.000*i11ry $yStem xeyepa =AA._fier s 1993, Ho be dated March 1, 1993, and to mature serially December 1 each year 1994 through 2013. Sealed bids, plainly marked "Bid for Bonds", should b e addressed to "Honorable Mayor and City council, Cit they"OfficialnBide Form" todbeumadeeavailable submitted by nthe city council prior the date of sale. All sealed bids will be publicly opened and tabu- lated before the council. Copies of the "Official Statement", "Notice of sale", and "Official Bid Form" are being prepared and will be mailed to prospective bidders on or about March 1, 1993, and will be furnished to any prospective bidder upon request, by First Southwest Company, Soo First City Center, 1700 Pacific Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75201, Financial Advisors to the City, The City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any and all irregularities, By order of the City Council of the city of Denton, Texas. JENNIFER X. WALTERS 1 city secretary City of Denton, Texas. 1 r f i is f i IT'. r}~- - art#r -;CITY.},... „}f COUNCIL ~~c tt.}~t}~ }{f}tr frt.. z fI1~tlZt~ t21'i +}~~~+Y~•~z2•~~I i.. i i TITT:x M: i ~ a~oF os0~ ~ s a o° p e 4 gj 0 O T GGOO~a f .}i2 Mesa -1. ~3 CERTIFICATE FOR f y ~r ORDINANCE DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE AND PUBLICATIOT7 OF NOTICE OF SALE OF CITY OF DEN MN GENERAL OBLIGATION-BONDS I~ THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON CITY OF DENTON We, the undersigned officers of said City, hereby certify as follows: 1. The City Council of said city convened in REGULAR MEETING ON THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1993, at the Municipal Building (City Hall), and the roll was called of the duly constituted officers and members of said City Council, to-wit: Jennifer K Walters, Bob Castleberry, Mayor City Secretary Jane Hopkins, Mayor Pro Tam Harold Perry Euline Brock Margaret Smith Jack Miller Mark Chew and all of said persons were present, except the following absentees: thus constituting a quorum. Whereupon, among other business,' the following was transacted at said Meeting: a written ORDINANCE DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE AND PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF SALE OF CITY OF DENTON GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS was duly introduced for the consideration of said City Council and duly read. It was then duly moved and seconded that said Ordinance be passedt and, after due discussion, said motion, carrying with it the passage of said Ordinance, prevailed and carried by the following vote: AYES: 1 NOES: , ABSTENTIONS: 2. That a true, full, and correct copy of the aforesaid Ordinance passed at the Meeting described in the above and foregoing paragraph is attached to and follows this Certifi- cate; that said Ordinance has been duly recorded in said City Council's minutes of said Meeting] that the above and foregoing paragraph is a true, full, and correct excerpt from said city Council's minutes of said Meeting pertaining to the passage of Ii 1 +~ando Ne _ - GG:S A2endallem 6L said Ordinance; that the persons named in the above and fore- going paragraph are the duly chosen, qualified, and acting officers and members of said City council as indicated therein; and that each of the officers and members of said City council was duly and sufficiently notified officially and personally, in advance, of the time, place, and purpose of the aforesaid Meeting, and that said Ordinance would be introduced and considered for passage at said Meetings and that said Meeting was open to the public, and public notice of the time, place, and purpose of said meeting was given, all as required by Vernon's Ann. Tex. Civ. St. Article 6252-17. 3. That the Mayor of said City has approved, and hereby approves, the aforesaid Ordinance; that the. Mayor and the City Secretary of said City have duly signed said Ordinancoi and that the Mayor and the City Secretary of said Pity hereby declare that their signing of this Certificate shall constitute the signing of the attached and following copy of said Ordi- nance for all purposes. SIGNED AND SEALED the 2nd day of February, 1993. _ city Secretary - - Mayor (SEAL) We, the undersigned, being respectively the City Attorney and the Bond Attorneys of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby certify that we prepared and approved as to legality the attached and following Ordinance prior to its passage an aforesaid. Citty Attorney Bond Attorneys kenda No ~J ORDINAICE NO. 93 I/ ORDINANCE DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE AND PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF SALE F Cl=.OF DENTON g+,'~gAl OgLICATION~ THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON CITY OF DENTON THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDA;NS: 1. That the City Secretary is directed to issue a Notice of Sale of Bonds in quhstentially the following form: OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SAIL CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS $3,050,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 1993 The City Council of the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, will receive sealed bids at the Municipal Building, 215 B, McKinney Street, in the City of Denton until: 7:00 p.m., C.S.T., Tuesday, March 16, 1993 for the purchase of: { $3,050.00 CenyCal Obli aq_eton Bond■,t•rie■ _1 a to be dated March 1, 1993, and to mature aerially July 1 each year 1994 through 2013. Sealed bids, plainly marked 'Bid for Bonds", should be addressed i to "Honorable Mayor and City Council, City of Denton, Texas", and must be submitted on the 'Official Bid Form" to be made available by the City Council prior to the date of sale. All sealed bids will be publicly opened end tabulated before the Council. Copies of the "Official Statenent', 'Notice of Sale", and "Official Bid Form" are being prepared and will be mailed to prospective , bidders on or about Match 1, 1993, and will be furnished to any prospective bidder upon request, by First Southwest Company, 500 First City Center, 1700 PAc[fic Ave,, Dallas, Texas 75201, Financial Advisor to the City. The City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any and all irregularities, By order of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, JENNIFER K. VALTERS City Secretary Gity of Denton, Texas. NerilsNo G ly That said Notice shall be published once in The Bond Buyer, New York, New York, whtch is a na.lonal publication regularly and primarily carrying financial news and municipal bond sale notices; and said Notice also shall be published ence in the "Denton Record-Chronicle, which has been designated as the official newspaper of the City of Denton. Said publications shall be made at least thirty days prior to the day sat for receiving bids. II i { I i AQvida No DFFICIAL N2T7rr no a" CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS $3,050,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, _ SERIES 1993 The City Council of the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, will receive sealed bids at the Municipal Building, 215 E. McKinney Street, in the City of Denton until: 7:00 p.m., C,S.T., Tuesday, March 16, 1993 for the purchase nf: ~ S3.050.00o General Obligation Bonds a March 1, 1993, and to mature serially July I eachtyear 19944 through 2013. Sealed bids, plainly marked "Bid for Bonds", should be addressed to "Honorable Mayor and City Council, City of Denton, Texas", and must be submitted on the "Official Bid Fora" to be made available by the City Council prior to the date of sale. All sealed bids will be publicly opened and tabulated before the Council. Copies of the "Official Statoment", "Notice of Sole*, and "Official Bid Form" are being prepared and will be mailed to prospective bidders on or about March 1, 1993, and will be furnished to any prospective bidder upon request by First Southwest Company, 500 First City Center, 1700 Pacific Ave., Dallas, Texas 75201, Financial Advisor to the city. The City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any and all irregularities. By order of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas. JENNIFER K. WALTER$ City Secretary City of Denton, Texas. I it CITY t `COUNCII I # rtt 3 ' u ' {r ..,t. # . ~ss ~ r . FI~• t ~OOOaO } t- 0 cr o+0~ C 4 ~QdQCCGG0~0 . i 11~iVI 1~0. ~ `7. 'S A flew I~ 111EA10 #93-003 - -2-? _ TO: Mr. R. Svehla, Deputy city manager FROM: J. L. Cook, Jr., Fire Chief DATE: v 28 January, 1993 SUBJECT: RENEWAL OF FY 1992-93 COUNTY CONTRACT FOR EMS Please find attached a copy of the contract with Denton County to provide ambulance service for a portion of the rural area of Denton County. The contract has been reviewed and approved by the legal departments of both Denton County and the City. This is our standard contract for services. The only change j reflects a reduction in the population figure. This is the direct result of the 1990 census being lower than NCTCOG estimates. FY 1992-93 budget revenue estimates anticipated a reduction, but did not anticipate the depth of the cut. Revenues were projected at $262,683 and actual funding is $245,534. This is a shortfall of $17,149. We anticipate that improved collection rates will compensate for the deficit. We will closely monitor the situation in order not to overspend our budget. JLC/bf E:\VP000S\VJRK\AMBU.RES 4C6ndr No. 93• DO Aa6ndaNA~ A' /G RESOLUTION NO. C~ A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERLOCAL AMBULANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND DENTON COUNTY FOR AMBULANCE: SERVICES; AND DECL4RING AN EFFECTIVE DATE: THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION I. That the City Council of the City of Denton hereby approves an agreement between the City of Denton and Dentcn County for ambulance services, a copy of which is attached hereto and in- corporated by reference herein, and the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the City. SECTION II. That this resolution shall become effective im- i mediately upon its passage and approval. i PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1993. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: frl~ i Aomda No -5- ABeMaitern THE STATE OF TEXAS, } ss. I COUNTY OF DENTON ) INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR AMBULANCE SERVICE - THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered by and between Denton r County, a political subdivision of the State of Texas, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY", and the CITY OF DENTON, a municipality located in Denton County, Texas, hereinafter referred to as "City." WHEREAS, County is a duly organized political subdivision of the State of Texas engaged in the administration of county gov- ernment and related services for the benefit of the citizens of Denton County; and WHEREAS, City is a municipality engaged in the provision of ambulance service and related services for the benefit of the citizens of Denton; and WHEREAS, City is an owner and operator of certain ambulance vehicles and other equipment designed for the transportation of persons who are sick, infirm, or injured and has in its emplc- such trained personnel whose duties are related to the use o, u_zh vehicles and equipment; and WHEREAS, County desires to obtain emergency medical services rendered by City, as more fully hereinafter described for the , benefit of the residents of Denton County, Texas; and WHEREAS, the provision of emergency medical services is a governmental function that serves the public health and welfare and INTFALOCAL AMM A.VCE ACRYI-MENT OBATON COL n', CITY OF TFVTUN 1 ape0a kem is of mutual concern to the contracting parties; and ff ,r~ ~G WHEREAS, County and City mutually desire to be subject to the provisions of V.T.C.A. Government Code, chapter 791, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, V.T.C.A. Health and Safety Code, Section 774.003 and other applicable statutes and contracts pursuant thereto; - NOW, THEREFORE, County and City for the mutual consideration I i hereinafter stated, agree as follows: I. The effective date of this agreement shall be the 1st day of October, 1992. if. The term of this agreement shall be for the period of October 1, 1992 to and through September 30, 1993. Each party may terminate this agreement by giving the other party written notice of intent to terminate thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice. III. As used herein, th^ words and phrases hereinafter set forth shall have the meanings as follow=: A. "Emergency" shall mean any circumstance that calls for immediate action and in which the element of time in transporting the sick, wounded or injured for medical treatment is essential to the health or life of a person or persons. Whether the afore- ` mentioned circumstances in fact exist is solely up to the discre- tion of the City. For dispatch purposes only, "emergency" shall include, but not ba limited to: h.71JUDCAL AA> [ANCE. ACPJ,.AMNT PE NTO,N COVSn' • CITY OF O&v TO? 2 A pWa ltem_1t~s , ,/9 It 48 -~J 1. The representation by a person requesting ambulance„ lJ /0 service that an immediate need exists for such service for the purpose of transporting a person from any location to a place of { treatment and emergency medical treatment is thereafter adminis- tered; and 2. Tha representation by a person requesting ambulance ~ I service that an immediate need exists for such service for the purpose of transporting a person from any location to the closest medical facility; B. "Rural area" means any area within the boundaries of Denton County, Texas, and without the corporate limits of all incorporated cities, towns and villages within said County. C. "Urban area" means any area within said county, within the corporate limits of an incorporated city, town or village. D. "Emergency ambulance call" means a response to a request for ambulance service by the personnel of City in a situation involving an emergency (as such word is hereinabove defined) through the instrumentality of an ambulance vehicle. Within the meaning hereof, a single call might involve the transportation of more than one person at a time. IV. A. Services to be rendered hereunder by City are ambulan:e services normally rendered by City under circumstances of emergency 1 as hereinabove defined to citizens of County, B. The DENTON Fire Department shall re:ap~nd to the requests for ambulance services made within designated area ,I2 of County, as INTYALOCAL AIMIANCE AGRFL%O'-NT DENTON COLT V • CFT V OF DFNTOV 3 ~1p~ndako --i3~, ' AeenIallerr~~'? set out in exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated vby'T' 16 reference. l C. it is recognized that the officers and employees of City have duties and responsibilities which include the rendering of ambulance services and it shall be the responsibility and within the sole discretion of the officers and employees of City to determine priorities in the dispatching and use of such equipment and personnel and the judgment of any such officer or employee as to Any such matter shall be the final determiiiation. I V. The County shall designate the County Judge to act on behalf of County and to serve as "Liaison Officer" between County and City. The County Judge or his designated substitute shall: insure the performance of all duties and obligations of County herein stated, devote sufficient time and attention to the execution of said duties on behalf of County in Full compliance with the terms and conditions of this agreement and provide supervision of i County's employees, agents, contractors, sub-contractors and/or laborers, if any, in the furtherance of the purposes, terms and conditions of this agreement for the mutual benefit of County and City. _VI . City shall ensure the performance of all duties and obliga- tions of City as herein stated, devote sufficient time and attention to the execution of said duties on behalf of City in full compliance with the terms and conditions of this agreement and MULOCAL AMNUANCE AG RMSMST :1ENTON COLN" • CITY OF U6\TON 4 k0da No itam~.~; Agenda shall provide immediate and direct supervision of the City % /Cf employees, agents, contractors, sub-contractors and/or laborers, if any, in the furtherance of the purposes, terms and conditions of this agreement for the mutual benefit of City and County. VII. For the services hereinabove stated, County agrees to pay to City for the full performance of this agreement the sum of TWO HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED THIRTY-FOUR DOLLARS { ($245,534.00) to be paid in quarterly payments commencing on October 1, 1992. The remaining payments shall be made respectively on or before January 1, 1993, April 1, 1993, and July 1, 1993. The sums to be paid under this agreement are based on a per capita payment for the population of the designated service area set out in exhibit "A". Population figures are as provided by the North Central Texas Council of Governments and are conclusive for the purpose of this contract. No payment will be made for service provided outside the service district whether by mutual aid agreement or otherwise. Acceptance of this contract constitutes final acceptance of the COG population figures and the service district as shown in exhibit "A". VIII. County agrees to and accepts full responsibility for the acts, negligence and/or omissions of all County's officers, employees and agents. Ix. City agrees to and accepts full responsibility for the acts, 1',nX .oCAt. 0MVt,&NCE AGKFE%0'.ST PF.NTOY COUStr . a n OF PENTON 5 Agenda No _3 Cl. .5geadalteni ~-~1..: negligence and/or omissions of all City's offices, employees and /D agents. X. In the event of any default in any of the covenants herein contained, this agreement may be forfeited and terminated at either party's discr.ition if such default continues for a period of ten r (10) days after notice to the other party in writing ^f such default and intention to declare this agreement terminated. Unless the default is cured as aforesaid, this agreement shall terminate as if that were the day originally fixed herein for the expiration of the agreement. XI. This agreement may be terminated at any time by either party giving thirty (30) days advance notice to the other party. In the event of such termination by either party, City shall be compensated pro rata for all services performed to termination date, together with reimburs.ible expenses then due and as author- ized by this agreement. In the event of such termination, should City be overcompensated on a pro rata basis for all services performed to termination date and/or be overcompensated reimburs- able expenses as authorized by this agreement, then County shall be reimbursed pro rata for all such overcompensation. Acceptance of such reimbursement shall not constitute a waiver of any claim that may otherwise arise out of this agreement. XII. The fact that County and city accept certain responsibilities I\TFRLOC %L WBULANCE kGRt£%SF.\T t FNTOS Cot sn . city OF VP_N to" 6 A091daNa relating to the rendering of ambulance services under this f t~ i0 agreement as a part of their responsibility for providing protec- tion for the public health makes it imperative that the performance of these vital services be recognized as a governmental function and that the doctrine of governmental immunity shall be, and it is hereby, invoked to the extent possible under the law. Neither City r nor County waives nor shall be deemed hereby to waive any immunity i I or defense that would otherwise be available to it against claims arising from the exercise of governmental powers and functions. XIII. This agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between City and county and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations and/or agreements, either written or oral. This agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both parties. XIV. This agreement and any of its terms or provisions, as well as the righto and duties of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas. xv. In the event that any portion of this agreement shall be found to be contrary to law, it is the intent of the parties hereto that the remaining portions shall remain valid and in full force and ' effect to the extent possible. XVI. The undersigned officer and/or agents of the parties hereto WFRLOCAL AWIALNCE AGRYI.W.NT MNTON 000TY- CITY OF MSTON 7 i Agenda No Agenda ltn i2- r.3 are the properly authorized officials and have the necessary /61/✓ authority to execute this agreement on behalf of the parties hereto l and each party hereby certifies to the other that any necessary resolutions extending said authority have been duly passed and are now in full force and effect. EXECUTED in duplicate originals. DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 110 Wes. Hickory 215 EAST MCKINNEY Denton, Texas 76201 DENTON, TEXAS 76201 By By Denton County Judge Title: Date: Date: ATTEST: ATTEST: Denton County Clerk Position: APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Assistant District Attorney Fir Chief LNTkJU,OC AL A.Wt ANC F. AGRMSFNT MSTON COLNn • MV OF MMON 8