The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07-13-1993 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET July 13, 1993 17 1 3" a apendalt ~d AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL July 13, 1993 Special call Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, July 13, 1993 at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be consideredi 5:15 p.m. 1. rReceive a egarding theorelease dof ETJcarea otoaArgyle andaBartonvillen direction 2. rReceive a egarding the implementation of the 1993-1997CIP staff Program. 3. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the appointment of a member to the Board of Managers of the Denco Area 9-1-1. District. a review of Appraisal discussion District's regarding budget. 4. Receive rCentral and hold a the Denton 5. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding providing the of Texas nDepartment Roselawn input t from U. 377. the e proposed Transportation redesign of with Denton 6. Consider nominations and appointments t~s the City's Boards and Commissions. 7. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. a. New Business This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1993 at o'clock (a.m.) (P.m.) CITY SECRETARY i NOTEt THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IS ACCESSIBLE IN oS CT a? ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 566-8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX SO THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE. ACCO012E t I y CITY COUNCIL y 5 4 01 01 0 0 f 0 AgenoaIt DATEQ ~ CITY CO NCI REPORT FORMA le L5 TO: Mayor and Members of the city council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, city Manager SUBJECT: RECEIVE A RE,ppRT AND HOLD A DISCUSemu orrao PROPOSED ULEASE OF ETJ AREA TV ING TNT SIVE SSTAFF _;IFECTION _ARUILE. AND BARTONVTr,r.E aN~ RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the city of Denton continue current efforts in working with the residents and the cities towards a possible apportionment agreement. SMR : In February 1990 City council agreed to release an area located in Denton's extraterritorial jurisdiction (shown on attachment #1) to Argyle and Bartonville providing that both cities finalize an theetwoncitiesohahow the area is to ve been working towards oes aioned. Since that time blishing an agreement line. The Town of Bartonville's position as explained by Mayor Adolf Andrzejewski is to annex Mr. Leesley's property which includes the Double L Store located at the corner of FM 1830 and FM 407 (shown on attachment #2). The City of Argyle is concerned about splitting the Stoneridge neighborhood and Mayor Jenkins has expressed the desire to work with the residents in the apportionment of the area. At a meeting held on May 250 1993 at the Argyle City Hall, Bartonville's Mayor reiterated their earlier proposal to apportion the area along the rear property line, east of and parallel to Stoneridge Road as shown on Attachment N2. In discussing that p roposal the City of Argyle agreed to invite all the property owners to meetin scheduled for June 8# 1993. At that mein the residentsrexplained that they wished to remain in D nton'stETJ and that they "do not want to be in Bartonville's city limits or ETJ." Mayor Jenkins told the residents that the Argyle's city council will place the issue for consideration on its July agenda. B&UM ND• City Council received a status report and held a discussion on this item on June 15, 1993. A draft copy of the minutes of that meeting is included in attachment 03. Staff informed both the City of Argyle and the Town of Bartonville with regard to Council's i Agooda No 93 -Q O...r.. Apertdalt ore position. (SEe attachment #4) Since that time we have also received letters from the Stoneridge residents reiteratinci their strong desire to remain in Denton's ETJ. PROGRAMS. DEPARTUENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Not Applicable FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable Rem c lly u m tt Prepared by: / Lloyd V. Harrell LieAA& City Manager Harry to. Persaud, AICP Senior Planner A rovead,, r ank H. Ro bins, AICP Executive Director Planning and Development Attachment #1: Map showing area located in Denton's ETJ. Attachment #2: Map showing proposed apportionment line. Attachment #3: Draft minutes of Council's discussion June 15, 1993 Attachment #4: Copies of letters sent to Argyle and Bartonville. re g 1 '~Qen0aND ~ ATTACIIMENT 1 Ap6ndzE SFicfINlN AREA REQUEST BARTONVILLEte& LM • • I ' I I ' : ' II! I I'I'I I• LO ALTQ1l _ NICK 011 , • . I r S I I 1 AREA R QUESTED ' ICALI 10 MONTH ATTACHMf. 'P 2 ~CeOdih "r _ f \ j t Date. r, ti. f ARGYLE 1 ra i!. a. w , UW E f,uOr µK PAS / cu 'n LEES tE%( % 41 AWE ye 135 VML ETJ i DARTOMYILLE % pop 141 d e ATTACHMENT 3 D 4901 100 City of Denton City Council Minutes 4ge~ddi June 15, 1993 Page 4 [kfe. 54S the area. Dlugas replied that it would depend on who completed the work. First area would be to repair the trussels which would requJre approximately $25,000 worth of materials. Rock for the trails would be approximately $50,000. If the work were done in-house the cost would be approximately $100,000 and if contracted out would be approximately $250,000. Council Member Brock asked if there were the possibility of any federal funding. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that enhancements had been submitted and projects would be chosen later in the year. Money would be awarded state-wide so Denton would be competing with other entities for dollars. Consensus of the council was to proceed with the project. 4. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding the release of ETJ area to Argyle and Bartonville and gave staff direction. Harry Persuad, Senior Planner, stated that in 1990 Denton had received a request from Bartonville and Argyle for release of property in the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction. The approximately 300 acres was situated in the southwest of Highway 407 and Highway 1830. council considered the request and as the land was surrounded by Bartonville and Argyle and as the City did not have a long term interest in development of that tract of land so far from the City limits, direction was given that if the two municipalities would agree how to divide the area, Denton would release the property. Since then Bartonville and Argyle had been working on the division of the property. There was a proposal by Bartonville to annex Mr. Leesley's property which included the Double L Store. The City of Argyle was concerned about splitting the Stoneridge neighborhood. At a meeting held May 25, 1993 at the Argyle City Hall, Bartonville reiterated their earlier proposal to appo-Lion the area along the rear property line, east of and parallel to Stoneridge Road. Residents west of the line had a consensus to not be annexed into a specific city and preferred to be in Denton's ETJ. After discussion, Argyle indicated that it would place the item on its July agenda for consideration. Staff's recommendation was to maintain the City's current position that the area would be released subject to both municipalities agreeing on division of the property. Council Member Cott asked why the City would want to release the DRAFTf City of Denton City Council Minutes AQAfldaNo. "v June 15, 1993 Page 5 AQendd(f ate property. S Persaud replied that since the City did not have a strong interest in development of the tract and due to the fact that it was surrounded by two other municipalities, it would consider releasing the property. Council Member Cott suggested keeping the property as the City might want to develop it in the future. Persaud replied that there were other areas in the ETJ which the City was doing for that reason. Mayor Castleberry stated that there were residents who did not w.Ynt to be in either city. He felt that that should be kept in mind. Persaud replied yes, Member aochange in theicouncil's thatitionreandtainwaing the the proiperty y would be communicate to Argyle and Bartonville that the Council had changed its position, If Council wanted to change its position, that needed to be communicated to the two municipalities. Council Member Brock stated that if the City decided to annex the property, the cost to provide utilities would be enormous. There was not enough potential in the area to cover the cost of development. Mana side of trger Harrell stated had petitioned to hBartonville to be annexed into that city, Mayor Pro Tem Smith asked if there would be access from the rest of the ETJ into the property if the Leesley property were annexed by Bartonville. Persaud replied that access would close off completely. If any land were released that land would no longer be in Denton's ETJ ae State law stated that the land had to be contiguous. There were many areas is Denton0a ETJ which had better development potential than this area, Council Member Miller stated that the purpose of the ETJ was for protection in development, etc. Not everything was for the benefit of the City. Council Member Cott suggested keeping the property for future use kAFT" Agenda NO. City of Denton City Council. Minutes Agendalt June 151 1993 ~1e Page 6 or get a benefit from releasing it. Mayor Pro Tem Smith asked how the residents felt about annexation into the two cities. Persaud replied that not everyone wanted to be in Bartonville. The consensus of the residents was that they did not want to be in any city. Comments from the residents indicated that if they had to be annexed they wanted to be with Argyle. After discussion, Miller suggested to continue with the City's present position which was agreed on by Mayor Pro Tem Smith and Council Member Brock. Consensus of the Council was to continue with the staff recommendation indicating a ininority opinion to not continue with the release of the property. 5. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding proposed ordinance requirements for board and commission members; a date for the board/commission reception; procedures for nominating appointments to the boards/commissions; and gave staff direction. Debra brayovitch, City Attorney, stated that in the Council back-up were the requirements for members to the City's boards/commissions. These were the conditions which the Council had imposed across the board for all members. There were specific requirements for certain boards such as the Electrical Code Board, Historic Landmark Commission, etc. Notice bras given board/commission members when they took office as they signed an affirmation of qualifications. As this provision was in the Charter, it could not be changed unless a charter amendment were done. Council Member Miller asked if this provision was only for action boards/commission. Drayovitch replied yes. she suggested that the application form include a statement regarding contractual agreements with the City. Council discussed the conflict of interest provision, a possible "cure" period, application of the provision to board/commission members. Council Member Cott suggested a reporting procedure to the City Manager for members who were 3 months delinquent to the City. Consensus of the council was to continue with the current process 4~eedeNo. ATTACHMENT 4 aQAOQdit we a i3 Planning and Development Department C11Y OF DENTON 215 L McYinney, Denson, Texas 76201 (617) 566-435o July 1, 1993 Mayor Yvonne Jenkins City of Argyle P. 0. Box 1035 Argyle, Texas, 76226 Dear Mayor Jenkins, Release of ETJ Area to Argyle And Bartonville Please be informed that the Denton City Council receivef a status report and discussed the proposed release of ETJ area located in the south west comer of FM 407 and FM 1830 to the City of Argyle and the Town of Bartonville. Council discussed the City of Denton's position adopted in 1990 to release the said area in view of the position taken by residents living In the Stoneridge neighborhood. I wish to mention also that the Denton City Council has changed completely in its membership since 1990, with a new mayor and new council members and there was some Indication that the council may wish to change its position and not release the said area. However, the consensus of the Council was to continue current efforts in working with the residents and the Cities towards a possible apportionment agreement. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. Fia1ry N. rsaud, A1CP Senior Planner Xc: Frank Robbins, Executive Director, Planning and Development. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager _F a apendrlNu aA~ddilen ate - 3 ~ q Planting and Development Department CITY OF DENTON 215 E. McKinney, Denson, Texas 76201 (817) 366.6150 July 1, 1993 Mayor Adolf Andrzejewski Town of Bartonville 1941 E. Jeter Road Bartonville Texas, 76226 Dear Mayor Andrzejewski, Release of ETJ Area to Argyle and Bartonville Please be informed that the Denton City Council received a status report and discussed the proposed release of ETJ area located in the south west comer of FM 407 and FM 1830 to the City of Argyle and the Town of Bartonville. Council discussed the City of Denton's position adopted in 1990 to release the said area in view of the position taken by residents living in the Stoneridge neighborhood. I wish to mention also that the Denton City Council has changed completely in its membership since 1990, with a new mayor and new council members and there was some indication that the council may wish to change its position and not release the said area. However, the consensus of the Council was to continue current efforts in working with the residents and the Cities towards a possible apportionment agreement. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. Harry N. ersaud, AICP Senior Plattner Xct Frank Robbins, Executive Director, Planning and Development. Uoyd Harrell, City Manager F A 267 Stonebridge Road QeRdaI l Argyle, Texas 17 June 1993 101 a !S The Honorable Bob Castleberry Mayor, City of Denton City Municipal Building 215 Fast McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Re; Proposed release of 212 Acres In SW Denton County, currently resting in City of Denton's ECj Your Honor. Early in March of this year we wrote letters to several City of Denton Council members expressing our objection to the proposed release of the area in which we reside from Denton's ETJ to a division agreed upon by the cities of Argyle and Bartonvllle for their respective ETjs. Since that time we have been In attendance at two called meetings between the two cities (at which Denton City Planner W. Persaud was present). Nothing we learned In either Instance has changed our minds about what is in our best Interest and that of our neighbors. Residents and landowners In this area almost without exception would prefer to remain in the City of Denton's ECJ. We are asking that you and the Denton City Council reconsider the decision of the previous Council to release this area for several valid reasons: It can cost you very little to retain this area as part of the City of Denton's EfJ since you have to supply us no services. The largest part of the area in question, the Stonebridge Road Diwelopment (1969), is toally self sufficient as to 1) water, (owning the Stonebridge Water Well, a water supply approved by the Texas Water Commission and the State of Texas and operated by a Class 2 certified Well Operator), so we are dependent on no city/town for water. and 2) we have a Road Maintenance fund for that purpose; our (privately owned) roads arse maintained without county, city/town assistance, 3) Electricity to this area is purchased from Denton Electric Coop, and we are in the Argyle Volunteer Fire Department District, again relying on no municipality to provide these services, and finally, 4) the large majority of our properties are In excess of Ave acres, providing space for efficient septic systems. We have been self•sufficlent for almost a quarter of a century, and %v like It that way, s Agen Qacreo gate In fact, there is only one resident/landcwner In the 212 who has petitioned for annexation (to the Town of Baitonville) and who wishes this area to be released to that end, and his pruperty is up for sale. Please consider the desires of the majority of the people actuallyEving in the area when making a final decision. We realize that you are tidying up your extra territorial jurisdictions and we understand your desire to do so. We ask, however, that you look at our area as a unique case, where you have nothing to lose by retaining us In your EfJ, and a lot of goodwill to gain by doing so. Sincerely, S ex. Ted 6c Barbara Loughran267 Stone ridge Roa~ Dr. Harley Goettsche,owner. Pcondstuo West ~ MrA Mrs. Torn Cl auvin 2 a CC: Council, City of Denton: ow (~1 M / dE5..-~ Brock,Chew, Cott, Miller, & Mrs. Joe Duncan Smith, Perry 271D Stonebridge Road tdatzttS y Mr. Lloyd Harrell Manager, City of Denton /JANS✓ b {'rae J Mr. Harry Persaud a13 SIC v gkt City Planner /ytbyce• - rs sz F,4U ~ IIG~,LG hOeft MY ftYE_ d~ E Agenda No, AQendalte - Rkhard & Sarah Petzinger Date / o~ 15 268 Stonebrldge Road Argyle, TX 76226 June 22, 1993 Mayor Bob Castleberry City of Denton Municipal Building 215 East McKinney Denton, TX 76201 Re: City of Denton's ETJ of 212 Acres in SW Denton County Dear Sir: For over 20 years we have enjoyed a country life, the excellence of Argyle and Denton schools and the convenience of purchasing our needs from Denton businesses. Of course, we have paid our share of taxos which entitle us to these benefits, but they have really been appreciated. Please pardon my neighbors and us it we are becoming a nuisance about this, but I'm sure you'll understand our concerns about events that effect our homes. I know you would be concemed if it were your home. And, the possible action of the City of Denton releasing the ETJ In which we reside would have a huge effect upon our homesteads. Simply slated, we wish Denton to retain us In their ETJ because we consider it the best of our options at this time. Barlonvilie has submitted a Thoroughfare Plan" which would cause our quiet, peaceful lane to be connected to a 4 Lane Divided Highway if they are successful In their plans. We don't feel that Bartonville has our best Interests In mind! While Argyle's ETJ would be our choice, should we haw to be removed from Denton's ETJ, It Is unclear whether all of this area would go to Argyle. If the -area Is divided, then other concerns arise. Furthermore, we have no Intention, at this time, to petition Argyle for annexation because they do not have any services we need, It Is not econorNCally sensible to pay taxes for no services. We know the majority of our neighbors are In agreement with our sentiments and I hope they are also communicating with you and council members to share our collective wishes. We appreciate the time you spend in considering this matter and look forward to Denton retaining this ETJ. I also wish to compliment Mr. Harry Persaud for his professional manner and dedlcaWn of time to this situation, Sincerely, Richard and Sarah Pet:inger L~ co; Denton Council Members: Brock, Chew, Cott, Miller, Smith, Perry Mr, Lloyd Harrell, City Manager / Mr. Harry Persaud, City PlannerV ApendaNo `OAS Agrdahertl. Date q _.1,L36-{' S 267 Stonebridge Road Argyle, Texas 76226 8 March 1993 Uovd Harral City Manager P Municipal Building, City of Denton 1~D I, 215 East McKinney il,'11i MAR 11 1993 Denton, Texas l! Ut C:I:.r .cq,yN Dear Mr. Harral; - I understand that the Town of Bartonville is again petitioning the city of Denton for permission to annex the ETJ south of FM 407 at FM 1830 in which I live. The residents of this area have, for close to a quarter of a century, more than adequately provided for our own water, road maintenance and other neighborhood concerns. Bartonville has absolutely nothing in the way of services to offer us, and is interested in annexing us solely for tax revenue purposes. (Just drive through the Town of Bartonville sometime and see if you would like to have It taking care of the road in front of your house). Last September 15 of the 16 families in this area signed a statement opposing annexation by any entity, and, In particular, by the Town of Bartonvllle. (This statement was presented to the cities of Argyle, Denton, and BartonvWe). We believe that our needs continue to best be met and our interests best served by remaining unincorporated. Please consider the feelings of the overwhelming majority of this area if annexation comes to you for discussion/vote. Sincerely, 4W'w4tx/ 4A4'wl/' Barbara Coughran t r r r ~ S March W, 1993 Denton City CoundI Mayor Bob Castleberry Mayor Pro•Tem Jane Hopkins Margaret Smith Mark Chew Harold Perry Eufine Brock Jack Miller City Municipal Building 215 East McKinney Denton, TX 76201 Dear Den r City Counc!! P rso~ zo, It seems that not flo^ngg ago I talkdd Wth the Denton City Manager, Mr. Lloyd Harral about the ETJ we reside in and the fact that we had no desire to be incorporated by Denton, BaAOnvilte or Argyle. In fad, there were the majority of the residents that signed a statement at that time that we did NOT want to be made a part of any community. He was very understanding and after the meeting with Argyle and Bartonville, Mr. Harral Indicated that Bartonville and Argyle would have to come to an agreement. It seems that that is what is occurring now. My husband and I moved to this area over 20 years ago BECAUSE it was unincorporated. Our children graduated from the Argyle and Denton school systems. We pald our taxes to support the schools and would do so again BUT, we like our private dead end street and are very happy with our little community. PLEASE, 4 there Is anything you can do, listen to us and help us to remain unincorporated. Thank you for your consideration. RC'1~44/ cs A Richard and Sarah F'etzinger Phone: 455247 R12 Box 268 Stonebridge Road Argyle, TX 76226 4Gends No Agenda I 7 September 1992 oglt L-A~E TO WHOM rr MAY CONCERN: 15 Q IS We the undersigned, located in the EfJ between Denton, Argyle, and Bartonville, Texas, are adam tly opposed to being annexed by any entity, and, !n particular, by the town of HartonvWe. The residents of this area have, for dose to a quarter of a century, more than adequately provided for our own water, road maintenance and other neighborhood concerns. We believe that our needs can best be met and our interests best served by remaining unincor- porated. The sigr ttures below represent 15 of the 16 famines in this unincorporated area. 0 Mr/ Mrs. Thomas Chauvin Mr/Mrs. Ted ughran 271 Stonebridge Road 267 St nebri ge Road 817/455.2 7 81 45 -2434 l /Mrs. Joe Duncan Mr Mrs. Kenneth Fisher 271 D Stonebridge Road 1712 FM 407 East 817/455.2058 817/45S.25 ,S4 Mr✓Mrs. Bob Hutchins Mr/Mrs. Thomas sane 1708 FM 407 East 1710 FM 407 East 817/455.2504 817/455.2442 _ h~ Ms nda Moore btr/Mrs. Richard Petzinge 1624 FM 407 East 268 Stonebridge Road 817/455.509 817~/45S-2472 Mr/Mr . Floyd Price Ms. Elaine Shiver 269 Stonebridge Road 1706 FM 407 East 81 /7- 817/455-7414 Mr/Mrs. Frank Strickler /Mrs. Elberqhonlson 274 Stonebridge Road 70 Stonebridge Road 817/455-2259 817/45540% /M s. Jim Tindle Mr/Mrs. Edward LeRoux 272 Stonebridge Road 1506 FM 407 East 817/ 4SS 8 17/455-2 33 8 Mr/M s. usty Vaden 273 Stonebridge Road 817/455.7472 r CITY COUNCIL a 0 40% s o Q OG AQMIQINO. ~aO a Z63 - 9-3 ,.0 CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 16201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8307 Office of the City Manager MEMC?I2ANDLTM TO: Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager DATE: July 7, 1993 SUBJECT: CIP Bond Election I At our recent City Council Planning Session some preliminary discussion occurred concerning the need to hold a bond election for our next five-year CIP program. During that discussion, the City Council decided that it would be more advantageous to fund the computer purchases for the Library and Police Department scheduled for 93-94 with certificates of obligation rather than general obligation bonds. Furthermore, the Council asked that additional information be collected concerning the 1986 CIP program and that this subject be scheduled for further Council discussion at a work session. Hopefully, this memorandum serves that purpose. Attached, the Council will find copies of a memorandum from Rick Svehla, dated June 18, 1993, which was the subject of our Planning Session discussion, and a memorandum from Catherine Tuck, dated February 10, 1993, which recites the 1986 bond issue history. Hopefully, these documents will be helpful to the Council in dealing with this issue and giving staff appropriate direction. The factual basis for this discussion is as followst 1. Because recent City computer purchases have been made with certificates of obligation, and because of continual changes in technology, the Council decided at its annual Planning Session that it would be more appropriate to implement projects #007002, #007002B (Library computer system), and #005001 (Police computer system) with certificates of obligation rather than general obligation bonds. City staff is now doing the necessary background work to implement this decision. i +cenda No Q Agendalte - Date Mayor and City Council aOT'sV July 7, 1993 Page 2 2. In light of the above decision, the only remaining unauthorized projects in the 1993-94 CIP, as submitted to the Council by the Planning and Zoning Commission, are the following projects: Willowood Bikeways/Sidewalks - ;112,000 Intersection Control Signals - $253,000 Turn Lanes for Arterials - $110,000 Pedestrian Signals - $ 34,000 Payne Drive Paving/Sidewalks - 4_30$,000 Total ;825,000 3. $1.3 million worth of street bonds remain from bonds sold in 1992 in anticipation of improving Fort Worth Drive from Collins to I-35. These funds have not been expended because the State has now agreed to participate in this project, but also has delayed such to at least 1996. Yearly principal and interest payments are being made by the City out of our debt retirement fund to retire these sold bonds. 4. If the Council is agreeable, all of these 1993-94 CIP projects could be done with a portion of the sold street/sidewalk bonds. This would allow the 1993-94 CIP to be accomplished with no further authorization action required. 5. During 19860 $7,736,000 worth of transportation bonds were authorized by the voters. Of this amount only $4,694,000 has been issued, thus leaving a balance of $3,042,000. Thus, more than sufficient bond authorization remains to fund the $1.3 million dollar Fort Worth Drive project when it is built in the 1996-97 time period. 6. The 1994-95 CIP contains the following unauthorized projects: Street Reconstruction - $638,000 New Roof/5 General Fund Bldgs - $399,000 Upgrade Existing Park System - ;300,000 All but approximately $150,000 of the street reconstruction project, project $0010141 could be accomplished with the remainder of the $1.3 million worth of sold street/sidewalk bonds. This would allow much discussed street projects such as Bonnie Brae and Hickory Creek to be completed within the next year. ApendaNa. Agendakte Mayor and City Council Oate July 7, 1993 Q Page 3 ALTERNATIVES At this point, there appear to be two alternatives available to the Council as follows: 1. Keep the $1.3 million of sold bonds in reserve until the Fort Worth Drive project is started in 1996 or 1997 and then utilize these funds at that time. This alternative would require either the immediate appointment of a CIP Committee with a quick bond election to follow authorizing a new five- year CIP program, or the postponement of the 1993-94 street/sidewalk projects until 1994-95 or after a bond election. 2. Subject to final approval from the 191 Committee, utilize the $1.3 million of sold bonds to do the 1993-94 and 1994-95 CIP street/sidewalk programs. This action would allow for a delay in submitting a new CIP program to the voters for at least o consistent with ne, and possibly, two years. Furthermore, it would be additional projects provided all projects action n t d in the 86 Bond Election are built. ADVANTAGES The following advantages are perceived for these two alternativess Alternative 1: Such action would allow the voters to specifically endorse the 1993-94 street/sidewalk projects of Willowood, Payne Drive, signals and turn lanes before they are built. Alternative 21 1. By utilizing the sold bond proceeds of $1.3 million for the 1993-94 and 1994-95 street projects, the City could postpone issuing a substantial amount of new debt. Such a strategy would save the city between $85,000 - $130,000 annually during the next two fiscal years. 2. This alternative would allow for the acceleration and completion of certain critical street needs by one or two years. i r Agenda it6nl~T Ve Mayor and City Council L4 g July 7, 1993 Page 4 3. This alternative would permit delaying the submission of a comprehensive bond proposal to the citizenry for one, and possibly two years. Such a schedule would hopefully, allow the economy to improve further and would also avoid any conflict with a possible sales tax election. Hopefully the Council can comprehensively discuss these various alternatives and give staff appropriate direction so that our CIP program can be kept moving at an acceptable pace. I look forward to discussing these alternatives further with the Council at your upcoming session. Please contact me if you need further information a'~-)ut this subject. Llo d V. Harrell City Manager LVHtbw AMM00301 Attachments t apenQaN4?3:: 4vda~iWe D 50 3 0 CITY ofDENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McK1NNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM DATES July 9, 1993 T01 Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROMi Jerry Clark, Director Engineering and Transportation SUBJECTi STREET BOND ISSUE STATUS Our two major street bond issues are coming to their terminus. The ten million dollar street bond issue from 1985 is complete. The $900,000 of remaining funds are to be used as the City's contribution required for the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation (SDHPT) project on U. S, 77. The limits of that project are from U. S. 3BO to I-35 near the truck stops (Union 76 and Border Cowboy). The following is a list of streets that were completed. The total project cost is listed with the date of completloni 4.$.1Q.lYl Dascrintion Cost/status Elm Street $300,000 US 77 Locust Street $600,000 US 77 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2629 Agenda No. 9 Apendafte ~kle `1~ Te South Designed CD ~3~ 19aslef Davis Street Done Avenue E Done 1984-90 Loop 288 Hold U.S. 380 (U.B. 77 to Hold Loop 288) Nottingham Done U.S. 380 Acquisition Hold 1990-91 Fort Worth Drive Hold (I-35 South) Fort Worth Drive Level I (I-35 North to Collins) Reconstruction of Oriole Done DRAINAGE DeacriDtion Coot/status Taylor Park Done Woodrow Bridge Done Pecan Creek Drainage Done Audra Lane Done Burning Tree Done Stuart/Selene Done Drainage Regulations Done -r Agorda No AAerd fte fete - 66 ISSUE STREETS/TRANSPORTATIONS/TRAFFIC CONTROL r ~J Descri ttiion Cost/Statue 1986_87 Turn Lanes Done Lillian Miller Done Signals-University 6 Carroll Done New Signals Done Signal Loop 288 d U.S. 380 Done Traffic Study Done Sidewalks/Hercules 6 Evers Done Parkway STREETS/TRANSPORTATIONS/TRAFFIC CONTROL Descrinticn Cost/Status 1987-88 Woodrow Lane Done Rebuild Ee11 Done Mingo Traffic 6 Drainage Done Teasley Lane Done Traffic Synchronisation Done Traffic Signals Done r r spends He. Agendall Late 1987-89 Willow Springs Done Malone Done Burning Tree Bridge Done Teasley Lane Done 1988_89 Master Drainage Plan Done 1989-90 Loma Del Roy Stuart/Sunnydale Done Hollyhlll Wait on Teasley James Street Summer 193 ANIMAL CONTROL CENTER EXPANSION D,sscr 2tion Coot/Status Animal Control Done FIRE STATION AND EQUIPMENT Description Cost/Status Fire Station fS Done Fire Engine Done ATHLETIC FIELDS/NEIGHBORHOOD AND SENIOR CITIZEN CENTERS Deecriction Coat/Stesye 1986-87. East Roo Center Done Athletic Field Development Done +ucnUb ii0~+ 1967-86 Gf'`34' Senior Center Done Athletic Field Development Done 1988-89 Rea Center Hold Athletic Field Development Done 199091 Rec Center Hold Athletic Field Development Underway LIBRARY IMPROVEMENTS DeaUIR"= Coat/Status Phase I $400,000 Sold Phase iI LAW ENFORCEMENT CFNTER/000RT CQUIM j~gecrintlon costl8tatu~ , Planning $200,000 Bonds Sold Phase I Under Design/Bid letting B-93 Phase II Under Design/Bid letting 8-93 AE80026A QQ agendaNo.J Agead9te Date f 1D CfTy0f DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 588'8307 Office of the City Menegor MEMORANDUM TOs Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager DATEs June 18, 1993 SVBJECTs CIP After reviewing our revenue, projects and our debt service capabilities, the flfth year'CIP projects were chosen. Projects were prioritized and then fitted into each year based on funding capabilities. Subsequently, in discussions with TXDOT, we found that Fort Worth Drive is not going to be bid until at least 1996. There are a couple of reasons for that. First, the State has now decided to participate with us in the project. Thus, we would be able to rebuild Fort Worth Drive from Collins to 1-35 as a six lane facility. Secondly, Buz Elsom and his group at the Resident office are also going to try to rebuild the bridges on i-35E at Fort Worth Drivo in that same contract or time period. Therefore, the Fort Worth Drive project has been programmed for 1995-96 and 1996-97 fiscal years in our current CIP. The reason this is so important is that the bonds for the Fort Worth Drive construction from Collins Street to I-35 have all ready been sold. Last year, we sold $1.3 million worth of bonds to rebuild Fort Worth Drive so that bond money is sitting in the bank not being used and it cannot be used for Fort Worth Drive until 1996. You may recall that there are some rules on arbitrage and usage of bond money which were passed by the Federal government in 1986. Those rules say that the money cannot be arbitraged) i.e. put money in the bank and make interest; you must pay any interest over and above the interest on the bonds to the Federal government. Secondly, the funds should be used within a specific amount of time. All of these occurrences made us begin to think of using the street bond money which has been earmarked for Fort Worth Drivre in a different way. s AQandaNo AQefld Ile Date - _ Lloyd Harrell June 18, 1993 Page 2 At the same time, the Council was looking at computer systems for Police, Fire and the Library. In those discussions, some thought that selling C.O.'s might be a more appropriate way to fund these systems. The last three major computer systems (GIS, phone system and word processing) that have been purchased have used the issuance of Certificates of Obligation. Also, there has been some thought by staff that since the average life of computer systems is less than twenty years, it might be more appropriate to use C.O.'s since our standard financing on bonds is usually twenty years. Given these developments, staff went back and took another look at the funding scenarios for the CIP program. There is approximately $1.4 million worth of street projects in the CIP for the next two years. There is also $1.95 million for the police/fire and library computer systems. Given the fact that the Fort Worth Drive money will not be used for the TXDOT project until 19961 it seemed that it might be appropriate for that money to be used to do the next two years of street projects. As you can see, the 1993-94 and 94- 95 projects include the Willowood bike path, turn lanes and traffic signals, and Payne Drive. In addition, the second year includes approximately $640,000 worth of street reconstruction work. Recently, we have peen requests from a couple of areas near schools, in particular Hickory Creek Road and Bonnie Brae. Currently, there is no funding for Hickory Creek. In just the last two weeks? Council appropriated $10,000 of unused bond money for Bonnie Brae. Jerry Clark has furnished me with a report on each of these which indicates several scenarios for each project. In each case, the scenarios that seem to work best and meet the needs are projects in which we reconstruct both the base and the travelling surface (i.e. reconstruction), in addition, on Bonnie Brae, we would be able to widen the narrow bridge at the northern end of this project thus providing a wider pavement for Liberty Christian School and the residents of this :treat. Staff would recommend these two projects as part of the funding for reconstruction projects. In fact, if the funding was used this way, conceivably these project could even be moved up into the first year and could be finished by January 1. If the Fort Worth Drive money was used for streets in the next two years, we would only need money for the computer systems, Thus, we might have a way to fund the next two years of the CIP road projects and the issuance of C.O.s could be a solution for the computer purchases. If we did that, we could avert holding a CIP olect;ion for at least a year and maybe two. All of these activities have happened in the last month and a half. We believe this scenario is worth considering for a number of reasons. r f i gendaNa " • +genda Item Lloyd Harrell ate June 18, 1993 / G Page 3 _ 1. We would use existing bond money that we would not use for two years otherwise, and we will avert any conflict with Federal rules. In addition, we have sufficient authorized but unsold highway and street bonds to meet the future needs for Fort Worth Drive. 2. We would be able to have the flexibility to move on some sorely needed projects sooner: i.e. Hickory Creek; Bonnie Brae) Payne Drive; Willowood, etc. 3. We would be able to sell less debt next year making the budget process easier) i.e., less debt retirement payments. 4. We would still be able to complete the proposed CIP for 1993-94. 5. We would be able to put off a bond election for at least a year and maybe two. This would allow the economy to improve further before conducting an election. Also, it would permit feedback from the visionary project to occur before a five year CIP program is finalized. Taking all of these things into account, we think it is appropriate for the Council to consider this option. If the consensus of the Council is to move in this direction, then the staff would recommend that this scenario and the opportunities it provides be taken back to the 191 Committee for their recommendation before the Council formally adopts this position. Thus, in summary, the CIP options are as followsi 1. Hold a CIP election this fall or winter in order to fund the 93-94 CIP. This would require the appointment of a Citizens' Committee in the very near future to refine and finalize the CIP and prepare for submission to the voters. 2. Complete the 1993-94 and 1994-95 CIP road projects by utilizing existing sold bond proceeds. Furthermore, move ahead with the sale of a $1,950,000 C.O. issue to provide for the library and public safety computer projects, this would delay the need for a CIP election for at least a year. agenda No C2S Aaendalte Lloyd Harrell June 18, 1993 Page 4 3. 1Cancel 993@94 the unauthorized thold a CIP selection contained time within the future. Rick ve la Deputy city Manager RBtbw AMM002EF I a f AgeadaNo. Agendalte Q Date X6,30 WrYODENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM DATEi June 18, 1993 TOi Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager FROMi Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering Z Transportation SUSJECTs Hickory Creek Road from F.M. 2181 to McNair School As requested, we have completed several cost estimates for upgrading Hickory Creek Road from a rural seal coat to a city standard road. Complaints an the road include less than standard width which prohibits school buses from passing other vehicles, drainage blocking the road at two locations durin7 large storms, the pavement condition being leas than acceptable from potholes and ruts, and the future location of Loop 288. The traffic count on the road at this time is 1,090 vehicles per day. We measured the existing width in three places with the average found to be 22 feet, The first solution will address the narrow rcadway and pavement condition. This includes 3 1/2 inches of asphalt and lime stabliaation of the subgrade, We estimate this cost at $110,000. No drainage would be upgraded other than some blading of the borrow ditches. Our second proposal is for a 24 loot edge to edge estate section, This will include a lime subgrade and an 8" asphalt pavement section. We have also included draina a upgrades including box culverts for the two culverts inside the city'e area o! Jurisdiction. Sizing is "timated for an 8' x 6' box culvert, a 6' x 4' box culvert, and time 36• pipe,. This proposal would cost approximately $470,00). The final solution would provide for a 4i foot street with curb and gutter and underground drainage the entire length of the project, This project would coat well over $1,000,000 so we have aasu.ned that it would nct be chosen as the preferred alternative. The first solution could be constructed in August 93 if priorities were charged and funding was available. The second solution would involve engineering including coordination with various entities. This would require an extended design phase with construction possible between January and March of 1994. Based on use and need, the first alternative is best at this time and staff would recommend it if funding was available. Please advise it you need further information, l~a"/- r 260 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2528 456-74-30 Date afeCITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 78201 MEMORANDUM I I DATEi June 110 1993 + TOs Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager FROMI Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering i Transportation SUBJECTt Cost estimate for South Bonnie Brae The section of Bonnie Brae to be repaired is from r.M, 1515 to willowwood. The existing pavement section is in poor shape due to no subgrade stabilization and a thin asphalt driving surface. The following recommendations do not include any upgrades to the drainage system except for some minor reshaping of the ditches where necessary. 1. overlay section with 1 1/2" Type D $161500 2. Neater scarification process (standard) 28000 3. Overlay section with 2 112" Type D 28,108 Stabilised subgrade EN-1 2,bQ0 TOTAL OPTION - 03 300608 41 overlay section with 5" pavement 610000 with 1 1/2" D and 3 1/2" A Stabilized aubgrade EH-1 2,500 Rework lot drallnags structure 34.000 SUB-TOTAL OPTION - 04 97,500 DEDUCTION 01 bond funds 10,000 DEDUCTION 02 Liberty Christian Contribution TOTAL OPTION - 04 82,50 Please include the coat of the IN-1 with alternatives 3 or 4 to insure protection of these major investments. our current plan unless modified is to do alterna:Lve 1 with '10,000 coming from bond funds and $6,500 coming from operating. This may involve shifting one street with improvements of equal value back one year. We fool this is cost beneficial since we are expanding the maintenance money with the bond funds, However, if more funding could be found the beat alternative would be number four. Please advise it you need further information, rr r 460 8171668.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2629 a 4 w r AM w a a r a r .rr IN4-98 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL GOVERNMENT -7 77 -IMA-- r r it - a ^~{,i> 1: ab.Lea ¢ b T!' Y~ r b 6v s w #4t IV/fir ofty" NYM 0If19i•~~,M~■ "Mm+M1 a'1 AM mm some: UNOM UNWKAO444. iNma 95-94 E4G 001001 ULL IAM MKLd S WALKI 69,000 0 0 0 53,000 62,000 0 93-64 ENO 001020 1N11YEM11Y DWIK 0410 ELM MW K"WK 100.000 0 0 0 100.000 0 t00,= 0 W94 PLANNING 001609 LANOODAPI MAKSY LN (W TO L MUM 0 79,000 0 0 19,000 125A00 201.000 30,000 09-01 E10 001002 WCLOWWOpOWWWAYMMEWALK9 0 0 112,000 0 112,000 0 112,000 16,000 90-94 EIG 001004 wral"WTONOONTROLINkNAL.S 0 0 263,000 O 253,000 0 963,000 9,000 93-91 E40 001006 TURN LANIUP011AMWIALS 0 0 110,000 0 110,000 0 110,000 O 95-04 ENO 001006 p®Ew"AN 6LONAIA 0 0 34,000 0 34,000 0 31,000 0 09-94 E40 001091 PAYNE ORK PANN & 8 01WALKS 0 0 306,000 0 306,000 0 306,000 0 99-94 LIwvm 007000 WARY QOMKM MM*YWfDA 0 0 511,000 0 511,000 0 911,000 0 05-41 L18 WW Om m Lam"OOMR "mirYgm 0 0 190,000 0 190,000 0 139,000 0 09-94 FOWADOL 006001 Ploe OuCE0.1M iTo , 0 0 1,600.000 0 1,600,000 1,600,000 0 TOTAL 159,000 79,000 2,766,000 0 2,999,000 123,000 3.119,000 4000 i kc ~wACracywnrwru~w~+rwwrwuvrnw~w~woorur~war. vV is IM MAMww.rMwwM.' MMMM1 NO wA &saW SUVA MO FAWw ft Al a 4 F x img 98 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL GOVERNMENT PROPOSED YC?AL ItE0118~0 ~ AMA 1'OTA~ ~ `~CP~►T• Elas" WTK 1*VM 01"M My 1 U11 N ~{IAI/AwT:.,VMwrr~..v. f.: ~yj ,R1rW GVi ~.yy~yy: ~IA~~ ~y rpowis WI PAW NUM R r~R/ViM~ 7rwq: 1 VR. R7~o/ 250.000 0 O 0 250.000 250.000 600.000 75.000 ►WRiHEAlT 81-95 PAWAWC 008319 PMKOEVELOPMENT p p 636.000 O 695,000 0 636.000 0 81-96 ENO 001011 rTM AIDOI lTWXTON 0 386.000 0 MW WOF 0 0 388.000 0 389.000 0 300,000 2000 BLDG$ 94-96 FAC MGMT 000201 Ljt 4 WE 6 Q tM ? wra TW 0 0 300.000 0 900.000 91-96 PAF*fREC OOR301 u`N E)OiT4W A111(tYdE11 TOTAL 250.000 0 1.337.000 0 1,567.000 250.000 1.637.000 77.000 a * . MpgCt C1/OiU~\~ My{ppJ N M IMYW II/N TW 1W om OOlwto 4RT. RMO ~001/ICI► .•nrM.A.NWq%Cg*,MUM CMT/CAIU M OOLIMTMl"M ULWCL MIMOR/ WW . i ~gendaNo. dq°nd !tern WTY of OENTGNgTSX" MUNICIPAL SUILDJNO / DENTON, TEXAS 70201 / TELEPHONE (0 1 7) W-8307 office of the City MtJ AW TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: Catherine E. Tuck, Administrative Assistant DATES February 10, 1993 SUBJECT: 1986 Bond Issue History In anticipation of the Capital Improvement Program, city staff had been preparing needs for a bond issue for some time before the 1986 bond issue went to the voters. Staff had identified needs and had a list of potential projects waiting for funding. In 1965, the voters had approved a $10 million street bond election to build additional approximately 20rmiles t of ystr14 eet!Z However, this did not meet call of the street needs nor did it address any other city needs. p-lue gibbon CI! Citissa I►dvisor~► Coaaittes in July 1986, the City Council passed a resolution creating a special citizen advisory committee to provide recommendations on implementing the City's five year capital improvement plan as proposed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. A committee of as the fifty-one citizens a which came in be known *a then Ayere Ribbon leader of the group wh citizens CIP Committee. proisat ■aiaatioa Five sub-committse■ were formed to study the five separate parts of the CIP. The sub-committees were as follows and were chaired by the followinq persons: Streets/Traffic Jack Miller Drainage Bill Claiborne Library/Law Enforcement/Court Joe Holland Athletic Fields/Neighborhood and Kathy Orr Senior Citizens Center Animal Control Center/firs Station Bob Gorton The sub-committees began with the City's five-year Capital Improvement Plan. During three meetings, weeks conductedvs fact ys gathering committee held, many many ,~qenda No _Rq WE _ ~0 consultations, and made numerous field trips. The five sib- committees met with citizens and city staff to determine the needs in each of these areas. Final reports were drafted by each sub- committee in early October. The reports were pared down slightly and submitted to the full Blue Ribbon Committee on October 13. A report of the proposed bond issue from the Blue Ribbon Committee was presented to the city council on October 21, 1986. The process that the committee used was explained as well as how the projects were narrowed down and placed into each year of the five-year program. Additionally, the Blue Ribbon Committee suggested that the a citizen committee be formed to ensure that the bonds are spent according to the use approved by the voters. The bond issue was also predicated on a no-tax increase promise to the voters. The City Council called a public hearing for October 28 on the CIP proposal. on November 4, the City Council passed a resolution calling a bond election on December 13. Bleotio Activities Beginning in October, a series of articles were submitted to the Denton Record-Chronicle each week explaining different aspects of the citizen committee, CIP process, and bond proposals. The City Council, Blue Ribbon CIP members, and city staff contributed to these articles. The same Blue Ribbon CIP Committee became the election committee and worked with volunteers on a publicity campaign. Blue Ribbon Committee members headed different task groups including a speaker's bureau, fundraising, special interest group representatives, media representative, public relations, letters from Council Members, and open houses. A list of the responsibilities of each of these task groups is attached. A fact sheet and a slide show were prepared. A speaker's bureau was organized and citizens spoke to service groups and a host of other community and special interest groups. Each special interest group was also assigned a citizen to meet with the group and ensure that information was provided. special interest groups were subdivided into athletic groups, senior citizens and retirement centers, Humane society, Friends of the Library, Domino Club, ministers, Benefit League, and drainage homeowners. The special interest task group made sure that leaders of the interest groups were informed, coordinated "get out the vote" drives, and sent a post card campaign. Another group of citizens worked on fundraising efforts. This group finalized a budget and raised funds to accomplish the tasks outlined in the budget. The media representative coordinated media coverage and recruited individuals to write letters to the editor. Media representatives were briefed on the bond proposal and the publicity campaign. A press conference was held on November 17 explaining the availability of speakers, announcing the open f a c~ Ace ds go.= Apdaltent.- ~a~e.~I ob houses, and recruiting volunteers. The Public Relations group developed campaign materials. City Council Members also launched a letter writing campaign to encourage individuals to vote yes for the bond proposal. The Council wrote personal letters to citizens from the list of voters in the last election. Typing was coordinated for this effort. The open house committee ensured publicity and coordination of two open houses at each of the facilities targeted for expansion: the Library, Police Station, and Animal Control canter. The bond election was held on Saturday, December 13. Approximately 2,100 citizens voted. The ballot had seven propositions and each one passed. Proposition: Karaini Streets/Traffic 4:1 Drainage 4:1 Animal Control Center 2:1 Fire Station 4:1 Athletic Fields/Neighborhood and Senior Centers 2:1 Library 2:1 Law Enforcement/Court 4:1 Dr. Ayer felt that the success of the 1986 bond election was the broad offering of propositions. There were items on the election that were important and beneficial to most every citizen in Denton. Additionally, the Slue Ribbon Committee concentrated a large part of its efforts on selling the proposals to specific interest groups. That helped ensure that citizens would be out to vote for at least the specific proposition of interest to then and would hopefully vote on all the other issues as well. Dr. Ayer also felt strongly that the idea of a "watchdog" citizen comittee gave everyone confidence that the bonds would be spent the way they ware outlined in the proposals. The voters must be able to count on the city to spend the funds for the projects approved by the citizens. This is a sugary of activities coordinated to ensure the passage of the 1966 bond election. Attached please find copies of the resolutions appointing the Slue Ribbon CIP Committee, the bond force proposals, responsibilitiesndeleanswers about the ction activities, b and a loctian tiaslins task activities. Please advise if t can provide additional inforsation. Catherine Ea Tub Administrative Assistant i PrP, T x 1I0'L ken, ea Agereaite Date ~ " 71 a P36 R E S 0 L U T ION ~ WHEREAS, in accordance with the City Charter of the City of Denton, Texas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted a list of recommended capital improvements to be undertaken in the next five years; and, WHEREAS, implementation of the capital i■rove.,ents plan Is an essential element of the goat of aatairif g tthe he gnecessary life of the community by providing for infrastructure, improvements and services to adequately serve the community; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it would be advisable to create a Special Citizens Advisory Committee to provide recommendations on the manner of implementing the capital improvements plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION I. That a Special Citizens Advisory Committee shall be manner s of implementingothencity's sfi five-year capitaluimprovements to the ity plan. SECTION II. That the Special Citizens Advisory Committee shall be composed of such persons of the cosmunity as specified by the ons intentlofnthis resolution, as directed by theaCouncilCe with the SECTION 111. That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of July, 1966 C Y LF DENTO , TEAS n ATTESTt CITY OF DENTON,~TEIUS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt ASSSTANT CITY ATTORNEY JOB MORRISs TEXAS CITY OP DENTO BYt ~1t►.t S~k'1n~~ 41 agenOaHo. a~s~da~tam~ N0. Deeember 13, file 113 dlelembre de Bale} Clty of Denton Bond El*ctlon (Cluded do Denton Elocclon Para Bone) SAMPLE BALLOT , (QOLETA MUESTRA) Place an "X" In the equln Dalde the slalemenl indlestln/ Q the way you wlah Id vols. (Maraca can Una " X' el euadrd at Iado do Is freN quo Indies la mamas M qua qulws wlted voter.) PROPOSITION NO. I (P110/UEITA NO. q S ' FOR U FAVOR DQ 1 1 T PK I MCE OF Or eTAin A ' 1 Of"~ M►ROA, M = MINT 90 4W M IA M 1 CALLLEav CON rRO ON. fil S A WOM A ' AOAI"T XX CORTRy PAOPOvrm No. Z 0"PUIITA NO. Z) FOR N MwOR 091 1 I Mll sauAMU OF I&AMM M ORAIN409 I IMPROVEMENT 90401 M IWS" a I BONN 0111 AM= ►AAA MEJOM9 ► Oftwu AONNOT IER CONTRAI 1 l . PROPO/ "No. I Fame TA No. 10 1 TM a1R1ANe9 0► e,aadde a ANNML FO""'"°"°° Voter's Guide: 1 CONTROL Md. 9oPAM NM a A WI Co. 1 aaaL RlTlq . AauwTllr eart,w I" about your bond issue PROPOOMM N0.4 MfMYpTA W. • FORIAP&M0e 1 "Oll 9dN'aa9aOMO1wGOioN OK°ao or a nw °i ►ARA t4alaa a aoMauoEl AaA,N9T ON oowraAl PROPOeft10N NM I peopuIlm N0.11 PON N PON on flRE 1990"RRa or y~W.ale~ to AM cowAgr, ! apNpa R~o~pdjO°iANOM1RTICMAA emium OMOM OM °10aALM 0 IN r a 100uo.OAVNO9d 0 AdU UW 00 txNnw r ENO, MOPO/fm N0. I ompu mm N0.4 ►aR (A r1M°" on TNl Ma LOAN Or lhor uMUUy ~ u~ewoN bpi ioNa a 1,.911,a1e A4~ 11N OONnWAS PROPONHON N0. f OROPYMTA NQ, 1) POO 6A FRAN" Do*" 09, Co" No Robovi W.-Of AfIAW ON 00011" T eR R nn agenda Item.. rate a 3~ PROPOSITION NO.1 STRff"ANS►ORTAT10NMRAFFIC COMM 'MOiMf JIG" ww111 &%NJ~ Ibwl omwwp 1 1e.9o9 1"j~ P'f'S y 1 400m TOTAL 13.4011" ~AfPaA1TnM011pop is Cw.M Iaub.wl 1' oho a PROPOSITION NO. S w woo OftN11A AIM ANIMAL CONTROL CENTER EXPANSIONI Tn,fIN /bO MW U.a IM IIAM 11LL vw bwft~ ow now 10,000 M1Mtl Dw1Y110wfw1NllrAlw 1 1M000 11.000 TOTAL 11.1000M 1 1M,OO9 WomPew tam ~ ave .~IO,"o FIRE STATION D EQUIPMENT paw" wwwwo Pew took 1600M IM►1111 TbW1 Los'p aw1uM1A~IM M T shoduam 7oo.oM rbaoww an I won Ilium TOTAL 1190000 151111 F'I I*from'"1WIPawLAoNDb11A0 7MAM PROPOSITION NO. S oFrom " " Ato r4a F4" ATHLETIC PIELDSAVEIGHSORHOOD AWWIWp apwV,tto"Do,w" It fte~AA~ 1109001 AND SENIOR CITIZEN CENTERS 1 116.991 111a11p 11104 %Vesta 0~ "aim Ilium Less MILAN Pr111p111e Fwtwr OVWW 1LAfA0M a ANO,. al woo . NO U.a M Iwo N Oa vW SwApWd 111w oo UA 3111 uw Pa1ky.0uc m Low III we L" WWW MW a10w111 N GfOw hwe 04 'JA 3 018 WAP sum 1w wavo rbowww tM/ M11 Pan Yt>rl1 /'A~I.Mq'AMWIOw _ y~0001 Aldo Floss Dw111~y 1 IOrum Om 1I.MQOM 11190,aM 1Ma1/11 tSMM Pam "we Ollw p, a 3M Few WN DOWN ItA11,111 A~~~O Ilium PAN 1Li to PL. MM 7x100 f1A1eA1Y 1 00AAN 10111 LIT 11110AM 11,1am 751 "b1W W.?3UW Owes, 11,106,000 PROPOINITIOM NO. ! AAWAW@ o.1rf1.1.N IMAM DIIAIN"I 11.110001 Uffil 0 tsf71 aW11' 6 MAW Sum NO PIIw 'r0r1'~1 1 10AM us"" N 11MPRO MEE,N,TS w T~a01M06~1~~0 MAMAN M 151M IMP1NY111111YN11~00 - m MIAPrIN"P10w1 6 100M0 / •.OM PP■NIIMM17YwP 1111w111A 1R1~1 NI,M1 111/ 6 11/AM Ai01 p11~6 17Mom AD5 I1,OMAM nun 1w16y TNA *A* ipm PROPOSITION NO. I TfArN1Aw"neP 1"An LAW OIPORIMM7 CuffmcoWIT COMPLU 1 1WAN swim 16*f~ P11AA ti w btata" Ow ~OwAPlw 1 w.a1 gMOMrYr01W1y0Mw / 1/,r 1w110r1111P Lew Wesa111y comwoIr10w1jo ,twi 6 IMAM 6 ~ 111►11/1 11011 p'MaF wVw6ww11P MA 1111 APr ~ C~111PP11MAII{w 6Yrw/rw11 M6r10PwfOw11P40 61.IIg011 pAT1,OM Mudd 1!M►OM . i) L =erda ko Ito R E S 0 L U T I ON ~t8 3 SECTION I. In accordance with the Resolution of the City Council adopted on the 15th day of July, 1986, the following individuals are hereby appointed to serve as members of the special Citizens Advisory Committee on Capital Improvements: Karen Abernathy Elinor Hughes Hugh Ayer Dave Krause Geneva Berg Jo Luker Homer sly Darla McDade Bill Brady Jack Miller Derrell Bulls Attie Miller Lucy Campbell Ralph Morrison Mike Campbell Clovis Morrisson, Jr. Bill Claiborne Bettye Myers Jake Craven Kathy Orr Bob Crouch Lisa Patterson Bill Crouch Fred Patterson Frank Davila William P. Phillips Roberts Donsbach Harold Reed, Jr. George Edwards Larry Reynolds John Enlov Richard Salazar Hazel Frederick Joe Short Robbie Gober Chuck Smith Bob Gorton Sue Smith Helen Hsiley Don Smith Tom Harpool Denny Snider John Harris Donna Trammell Lloyd Hindman Ed Volski Joe Holland Donald Wright Ann Houston A. E. Wyatt John Hughes SECTION 11. That it shall be the charge of said Committee to make recom- mendations to the City Council on the manner of implementing the City's five-year capital improvements plan. SECTION 111. That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of September, 1986. CITY F DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: 3buRtf 11 C OF TOWt TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORA: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS h +gende No - A 9~dalte a SOW ~ t^ 14 3 W1 to . N fill 215 E. McKinney BULK RATE Denton, Texas 76201 U.S. Postage PAID Denton, Texas Permit No. 464 VOTE Dec. 13 - Civic Center, 321 E. McKinney sMx i~N ecea aroma WOOD was u-M I 0000011 OOOOOOV 000'90114 000000re 4ePlJ4 46na41 AtPuoW 1o19o1e1 w'd S-'w'e 9 000 am 6'W0-Ii ooa991s1 ReuuiHOW •3 SiL ooaaaoK aulollnS lediolunVi ,a,9o1,e 6U110A aaaeood N1u~~grl ooo9av 9oa9oavl 8U501d wwunajdwt MIC163 JwA *All uo2uea jo AiTJ I l TO THE CONCERNED~I CITIZENS OF DENTON: wr dr at I no" drrl be spew as d owl W% w oda"ar mm~ 0e"W "'wr The OeamDsr t3. "06 bond election tot IM 010 140,0 711 "h anm 10s•NhOwal" Testwil i"I poAbnd IPAl w wO"Mly Ida rKrNlan CM101 a IIO.Ow"O l W powd live you Capital kWOVOMnI program is our of IM spiral bawl •Ir a wW WOO law 1st twat bonM •w nr be •wm.Nl r«p Of ups Glr Npwr ga•1h ^N Occurred M *4 WI, sow OWN 1Mt nonhwl, W swtlwel its I" errsaee cwlall we "M IQ IM most crucial issues facing our Community today. We br ~DI W want ch"" was Nws wr c a W have responded to twenty-two flusstlone that appear to Nw wr q r.w M r«1"a la veer at1 a sass dam peer.Is k won we b" Yh or AW"di r IM «rw "0 w saw 0 xa • rKrNI on caldr a s• w sacs r« r ar be Wliaufafy impoAa of while #"Izt lg ItNt every quit. apperadt IM ar to tion. no mattair how bill w somall, dswves an answer, Carnlly. its at ON clip la. WI at 11e IICS.Nuelwn Is de.olpd tm"anlly . Tier he lqw Aw of w sedw extra" COMW aloalsrrt Many of dicta quotations vol asked by members of MIWO b vealn SUNNI N of m VNII awe 0 as be ~1 M e IKNose , mew OIMIo II as" IM City CCOAAP , CIIltaors Blue Ribbon Advisory Com talyl was Prro v ~ III /rvve tan to lrprerM rrMOW I No YICreAN Dartw'e Nd"r paWAella^ comma" to aw 1st dsrlshda w epKa mittee and planning and toning commission upon kF Ned aw we w wn tar ON aIa•er we to IN deleted W «aAN D Pe l W a.Wm" A Imps wWU"'P"'~a~ w he II IN ruMw of the reCommNtdW program. Several pobliC a as a~b an "*Food? dial wee Cam me, psaoval cluwA oop w loom 0 p04 art d tee with rw Ieenl. •NIMII ON" have been de held Nod after eight months of lo- raalr W orlka w .M+r aprw°" t o City cwn<a b« welt dopl« a reNWlwn rat e&I Ial,neo • W40 eN• kill penwy rev wiw/ «YAYw we Nw he ralyd w lhs Wall W," S enNWrlrle sell M"rpera a IM DIw AWbM r• *w DMww C►U •r M 80..M M M« Yr M rer11 tense pll noting whil 84A. Out groups ~knOultY f lw TM agol 1 all sewn propoellloln and each •peClfk: pro C kIwI I Adr wxr CaarAllw •w eawpM tw is br bo d bwr« 1 is noeled to help SOW problems that exist lodey. al at Moat bwdw allh ad Pawls Tlua tittle" sow WIN or'- war .saw IrAwk PAN MIr«a•Ip a WOMM M 0Yce Amer to ww• br at to pragaw w al a llrw rev POWs" e are dao polo pleged to Bnnounce that the Cspltat moat •w be ra«a POWAY r tar o w • real a wa oMn Y ale D"I" M• err awewl aNaaaa le,alnsd W 41 $0 Iba► seer I" kwovuwl peogrsm hu been structured so that IS ed• pew wiled tw.dN"Yr e"s'd.,,'"'L"p.l;.lw "c:Nw l 6o w mt OWti'".p•I" " Wei INIlellal kl0peaee N tide lax Ivey is repuked to land the Olds" w narar.prat 1 bW love to w«rt Th s b" rave rare saws a"leh hpr alealrl w bread Mllte QrOg1Y14. arid too lelpewr lloeo Evw"rr" rIwNNYw Nh F•M e We hops you will study the taCle CW*IUN l end trole M« A IQ 'heal Aral sins tMagaa ass w or" M Md M" Of bra Iwo a berbrl Iw1 lee r. W "woo" on all sloven Ixopwkbns on December 11 aw Nr"1 bapnrealera twbaaa else and ar pares rteowwy rev M ydw wenrl~i rmo~tw Yr. M eepp. wA1 eve ar.ww.w Sincere Clanks and appreelaliotN, aw.all-'.rase A. a selypp w be b.raMA r wm Li" Pork Tv* 0 ~e1• MIbM r M piled Me 0,810 so Avows saYAeY M Wow W Moo it" we so pNw+M pile Im p1 New 11Nr •r M iwrrea r AN f(/. J Ollb htk Taw Myw«r«r MO MNw M N flare @104" I~ l pee"abwt Ykhrdea hMe a p.Vwd lee Wsrar, to Capao IN be P rarr. r WbW Ray SlepMfts Ydeyor /weed e.raw sw A.. IN as ev w kwlan Iron MMep noad a re street W ePrrrw Y Yalllale Y w laArwaar otol A" a is M 00 aA AvIll Plastic wr as w1y~l M so the w w / Irwa/ yy serve N sw aim wm Iaerorlrawm otpour bt IIw bar P "Y POMA s as "aural arses alai w r+ r w stet y r) r 11 all N Yaw. br•arM wrnN" al II1 eYI80 on% eM M *"W" u M M fwM YlpW•1W 0 1W 41erI11a1 O's I! tt ~ IAIIIep Ileac. wd WA viva aIrWw w ON be toa pee M 1Mi TM "als Hugh Ayer, uWrMM weear Oar par ewIwd ed al Yrw.al.Y b,YrW6dwd r M w laeewa W W w "corms m WON 14 M 1ws A r« citizens BlWRlbbOa AdvfeOry CanITYtlee wal4arwleouku Ips /«I'ierw MYt►aaAY.►1ssMd'r' "clod Weld. wralaps WanawwalMatM swMw W*h oar Wr Ttw bale Y/ w All prate svae w e "par sew err ewN rev MOD tee U 9.!10. U s 111 veld LOW M av4mw4M* cm a Pd NM be bvrin ilea TM taw". mop" wool be u"IO1 MM awam" oil s«as•ar el.lrbsoMMd UW r►1e•rr elivrle•ras W01i4011 r" a M V* Oft soil CWba ne, Chattmen tdsr w ar• rWan w oaq 11.M o"bbWd by fe, CIIP N D.rw. no start KWng and Zoning Commisebn wYia Orr d Cdr tr ►.r W *moo" Is tMt; bur rev .w rr spaA1 dleMMv prpAel "bubo also reesl seeslW eve lasrlr" weal Tpar waw~u p4Kr am ssnnw bow ah bwawwo "ae arts ar TM wwiw d waxwe Nr►wd r Ym anw w Moand " " BOND ELECTION Mw brpscl as la odaad rllllew DI naIl I M Ya► r w = a rsr W as AW M a low dd 334 rrrW s1 1 -d M Ykll M M M parts M flits ONOWwc •.w TM gnlefa e«"a1 r r1IW M 0* 4m a,WY W /wI QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS tee mom" w bwd wvewd he oro.dad hold Matw#" ""wrw I1r do w as" / Lw game&"r AAW Cal11 C MOO air" M 1st sw p""uft Y /malt/ Iraaw v a raalM o tray ► Mrs p o"w Ae se"1 hie ospwawo yr r b" so rrarsw ON Clq ar braist A Os o«uI10al 10. IIK r reellsrai roles M xve CYp d DsnNw •r TM ►oaca O•pwwwl •0,111wa Of rarlI -Nall ar Cop Mr bdwlhe war do w owe rev erwt Meet hero a P1 r acme •MMr 1 a, I wrua doer mpsd w/r"a on 1M 43 Tars a« a come "w a came era WI are onke yew r wrlcW se pa"" Cwl tWnf hero uylar", hororw. M d fa The Malcom. Lavery A"ocwrn wd Save L10I Au klAWO P n wd parron saolAd M srpewd ypalq r ter oW Gt1' Xab brwkre Y hot vs" wN sw 1st h,, I drwmtnes air 11 s easom W or NWWY spas Y weed W Pww Ile''" oral it"" to KcarwkdW* aonw of IM IpKw ore N • OM rMer7 ho 36POW opms ION W blow " oa 0"400 Of M who who he ~a 1 C.phad ow 11Np• bnpllyolaeAr"e e r ttiArt d paper tw .la, It ap vamks DepwmrrA LAO of Mac/ Y Nr I PON" M wma d bade VIA ppoorlnrlrl Uses, a aw of 41AM eaaale he of stvew r ""w rrA ►Id Mrs wee skla rsl, 1st rule of onams srw Who W pvhr his w sssard som to wa sd mr as Ave be w&%&b to 1 µ1N4 ro.W Ilparaed W bow wlctwAM ok a Impowmants oanN h" mislead "M m a *4 4" 000 of I%" to ass .0 at to 1 rev Y the" mom4d M o/OlmodW now $ NM will Much, « WNN , Mra~ltlr wer,%. he ad pr" 1acsN« was el,p Ikws to bas pep avA Our Wish, Wets v I 1st L" Tnlac"wN wo Nr YI Mort M rva/wmw" slwdra. a aadNk lire, lllowrawd W 00" Asuse etas. ovd CM1altCo l CommiI .w sour IM carent,ro•ap W~ ale rw1 ObOWdIP M lumae /p,rarts Cwws"tkr d a• W wlwawa 1st slrAaclpel we ar Ybaee eery be alpaed w we a bwA a" WA wits *"A IeA«Im re"m Me P,,Pnm av M tea Me" cwA %OK tb , •w Yea be Inwu+d Mo IwM o s dep.a.en w M M Mpwm eMYll bMlmearat /Mar «brrd Yswt a r Mike Irwalw to Cher I1r Owl iw lee walla W ODOO d I I ae At MA UW. d W e.aflrrp swary wW IM M Iva mWO acloka r wedeby to Cdr CwrveA IM AwoOks ale to" two ON Nod Nall vnal fm 1st 14111104 plebs al WOO sill bare been ale boa 10" Wow TM link "W Y w raves Ip«o TM vwdlm 1 prw r cabal b yore bdala ,OMPlKIbn bepsr"aAa d to rape Y rot «Iwdrw to boon was sIM11M 1 aa14Nrn wbMN low hue rl/r tap" onwo""ald M"^rM Imo wood pass at Owes sch"rled to seeks bills 1w1Mt T" Ialso aka a POW III dkAW sera c,W,,ewWW Ir , a.a«rd Dom sKlded am A Y saw 10% boO OMAWM Mw @I Oft drvluo'I as q"rr PI W bW rYd aowa rpr4ntw9 sal oW au aspps~ a M W Car NO WaYly x live s haw 00" NIw IvM a /IIAr vas q N auaryy wW • ono ..a "rraba"oa. a, mm r pp mralw" arW b./ "al TMs rrr stem" Is e W IawoeaYal cv"oceOwl C"Mrst verve ono tool IM L4wT DW47 tN•4 r l per tee CAP CwImd as OW veal CAI"" MrpkawMl r« Ilealdsd are aht pMan GIQ"'2 Iw M"h Adr*"COm"Alos Mtawed ter IYro+rvy We led clip Ile' *will" pooorwd W weed af• a e rev MwsN" cvwM W V&46 n Rdsorl testae , Pow"**" CdrM"Pow"Commit". "v e. W AerurW rev ton W cam 0011A and huwlcrr IWrvtkr4 arol of IM Cal of Donor wo ON saps ON aa use Ia Cn7 pwpowl TM Clip at borate 0a«Ny him" to I to is taut urn. Ihr wb" let" w w tee band cWIIII aprabvNN11s1,11p/ altssee do, aw toms "navy "Wad SW8 it "1awroval at 0I1 W M Y cwlrn 1M1 MW s•penw rN eI[reeale CovlPlVtlbv W 1a Lad At Inc Glr el Anon CIVIC Cww Mlasy wee" 1 mar on M «pbd IynNlad prep•r be omw*W tnsacoamA C MICIld CIR40A roue Caw CAI' IurKtkrr such r w DKaftel 13, OW set•eor T M a r arms 191 II NA peeas'1ve" MI olpro•oA by eve rows WOO' ob4Oo" we ►rawNnp thsl do fm ml 11084 W*4wo at pAac tam"t to Mhws wM M said W 10 rot"" r IM soOwa sass DIM a WHO to are we W aid Gb ties bvaarle 111014% iW«44 Md wcW r a" who w I "Mull e 1 am Iwo pNMala 86" eY be 1111 hIWKa N1a rosK11 11od11wrT the comens hornb em was N svp 1kn1 •w its* bas w deopweadl ft Iehl bond re1w1 sa call awswa-ml 4"vl "IV area rev bb14clpo e•walr9 p1Nala ca1Ki Ur CAP Yalrapsr'l dlW r 1Ma3w a W IneSpoor alra n w Mw nYn art lchodvve our sus N ralvWy Ihf O"11 are os•oapl no D1pMlaww as snipe n e1MW w11rw to how da4 go eve Npw taws m j 5 aQendaNo.~ r-t Agend I1C - Date ago TASK MASTER RESPONSIBILITIES A. Speakcrr's Bureau 'task Master - Jack hiller Assistant Task Master - Lisa Patterson Staff Liaison - betty McKean 1. Recruit lay speakers 1. Contact all clubs and get on programs 3. Inform lay speakers of obligations 4. Coordinate with Assistant City Manager Betty McKean B. Fund Raising 'task Master - Leith Appleton Staff Liaison - Lloyd Harrell 1. Work with Campatgn.Chatrman to finalize a budget 2. Raise the required funds C. Special Interest Group Representatives 1. Meet with group and tnform about the issue 2. Encourage to vote for all issues 3. Insure group leaders contact members 4. Insure group organizes a "Set out, vote" effort 5. Prepare post cards promoting the election 6. Special groups a. Athletic Groups Task Master - Mike Ca■pbell Staff Liaison - Steve Brinkman b. Senior Citizens, Retirement Centers, High Steppers Task Master - Hazel Frederick Staff Liaison - Steve brinkman c. Humane Society Task Master - Roberta Donsbach Staff Liaison Bill Angelo d. Friends of Library Task Master Georgia Caraway Staff i.latson Joells Orr e. Drainage Homeowners Task Master Von Smith E. Uomino Club Task Nester Les Holland Staff Liaison - Steve Brinkman So Ministers Task Master - Bill Crouch h. Benefit League Task Master - Donna Trammell i AAenda No. ~ ~ , ABs,dalt Task Master Responsibilities [)ate ~ Page 1 a~ 3 D. Media kepresentatlve Task Master - Bill 041borne staff Liaison - Rick Svehla 1. Brief media about the issue (Channel 250 Denton Record Chronicle, University Papers) ' 2. Coordinates coverage and appropriate presentations 3. Recruit individuals to write "letters to editor" in support of the issue. b. Public Relations Director Task Master - Joe Holland Staff Liaison - Betty McKean 1. Develop a campaign slogan and committee name 2, obtain approval from steering committee 3. Develop campaign material as requireA F. Letters from Council Members Task Master - Bob Gorton staff Liaison - Lloyd Harrell 1. Obtain personal letters and marked lists from Council - 2. Arrange for private typing of all letters 3. Arrange for mailing of all letters by 12.8-86. U. Upen House Task Master - Tom Harpool Staff Liaison - Rick Svehla 1. coordinate with City staff regarding arrangements. 2. Arrange publicity for event 3. Arrange for refreshments, etc. S1b0M/11•lOb1 W 'geoda No. Rgendallo G?te eLECfIuN ACTIVITIES A. Prepare Fact Sheet B. Prepare slide Show (IS minutes) and script C. Letter to all Boards and Commission Members from the Mayor with Fact Sheet D. Letter to all doards and Coamission Members from Hugh Ayer With Fact Sheet h. Presentations to all Service Clubs and appropriate special interest groups o Service Clubs o Chamber of Commerce o Firefighters o Realtors o Police o School Teachers,(TSTA 4 DCT) o Bar Association o Black Coamunity o State School o Hispanic Community o Dental Society o Benefit League o Medical Society V Fund Raising G. Special Interest Groups (contact, inform, get out vote) o Athletic Groups o Retirement Centers o Senior Citizens o Uoetno Club o Humane Society o Ministers o Friends of the Library o High Steppers (Senior o Drainage Homeowners Citizens Dance Group) H. Media - Record-Chronicle, University Press, CATV 1. Speakers Bureau 1. Lay persons 2. City staff J. Letter from city Council to friends K. Tours of Police, Library, and Animal Control L. Letters to the bditor 3153M/111096 L62 J ~ge~Ca1VD Ag ,,alum 1906 DOWD ELECTION TIKE TABLE City Council passes resolution creating July ib a special Citizens Advisory Committee to implement capital improvement Plan City Council appoints fifty-one member Deptembes Z citizen committee September 4 first Blue Ribbon CIPtcommittee meetingi Sub-committees collect facts, most with September 30 citizen groups, study needs October t Sub-committee reports :o war ded to Blue Ribbon Committee Chairp October S Sub-committee chairs and Blue Ribbon Chair reduce project list and finalize proposed projects for each year October 13 Full Blue Ribbon approve finslittoo votes unanimously to app CIP list planning and toning Commission unanimously October is approves Blue Ribbon CIP Committee report of five year plan October 91 City Council received the Blue R1ebbon CI? year Committee report of five City Council held a public hearing on the October Z• proposed CIP recommendations nance Koveabsr for en omin n Deciember Balling Wove ber 17 Press Conference held Voters approved all seven propositions of December 1! the bond election CITY COUNCIL ♦ 0 , ~J i ~i Awl No. ~pen6a fte 10 3 D CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDJNG / 215 E. McK1NNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 NEXORANDUM DATE: July 8, 1993 T0; The Mayor and Members of city Council FROM: John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance SUBJECT: DENCO AREA 9-1-1 DISTRICT BOARD NOMINEE Attached is correspondence from the Denco Area 9-1-1 District office regarding the reappointment of Mayor Olive Stephens to the Board of Managers. The current term of Mayor Stephen's expires on September 1, 1993. Mayor Stephens has expressed a willingness to serve another two year term if appointed, and since the district is not aware of any other person seeking the position, they are requesting that council consider her reappointment. If Council would like to consider another candidate we should notify the other entities since the successful candidate is required to receive a majority of affirmative votes from the area cities. The total number of cities eligible to vote is seventeen. Please advise if you have any questions regarding this matter. JFMCGIaf Attachment AFF00619 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 AgandaNo AgendaIter--" -43 - DENCO AREA 9 - 1 - 1 D1§t' R~~R 3 • 250 S. Stemmons, Suite 260, Lewisville, Texas 75067 Phone/TDD (214) 221.0911 FAX (214) 420-0709 Y TO: Mayors, City Managers, City Secretaries FkOM: Mike Pedigo, Executive Director DATE: June 22, 1993 RE: Appointment to Denco Board of Managers The legislation creating the Denco Area 9-1.1 District requires the appointment of two members to its board of managers from the cities participating in the district. The current term of Olive Stephens, Mayor of Shady Shores, expires on September 1, 1993. Members are eligible for reappointment. The current members of the Board of Managers are as follows: foard A ee_nLes r; anted b, Term Expires Ocorge R. (Randy) Corbin Denton Court) Fire Depts. 911193 Lewisville Pfre Dept, John McGrane Cities 9!1194 City of Denton Olive Stephens Cities 911/93 City of Shady Shores Jim Ferguson County 911/94 Lewisville Dr. Allen Groff County 911194 Pilot Point ASelvhti Willis Advisory Mayor Stephens has expressed a %villingness to serve another two year term if appointed. At this point, the district ie not aware of any other person seeking the position. Should you have a candidate, please notify the other cities. The board appointee must receive votes frorn the majority (11) of the cities within Denton County. The Dcnco Area 9-1.1 District asks that you piece the appointment of a representative to its board of managers on your council agenda as.aoon as possible and send us a written notice of your choice, Enclosed is a sample resolution that you may wish to use. Thank you for your help in thf: matter and if the Denr,o Area 9-1-1 District can be of assistance in any way, please call us at (lid) 221-09i1. Agenda No AgnCa tam lrte COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPOINTING ONE NIEbt BER TO THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE DENCO AREA 9-1.1 DISTRICT. WHEREAS, Article 1432e, V.A.C.S. provides that two voting members of the Board of Managers of an Emergency Communications District shall be appointed jointly by all cities and towns lying wholly or partly within the District; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEXAS: Section 1 TheCityof herebyappoints as a member to the Board of Managers of Denco Area 9-1.1 Emergency Communication District. Section 2 That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1993. Mayor _ City of ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Secretary City Attorney CITY COUNCIL y s e e r ~ ODGUO~' r ktf ~ ~ Date - 3 / o?cp D CITY o/ DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM DATE, July 8, 1993 TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance SUBJECT: DCAD PROPOSED BUDGET Attached is the Proposed 1994 budget for the Denton Central Appraisal District. Mr. Joe Forsythe from the Appraisal District will present the budget and answer any questions that the Council might have. Please advise it you have any questions concerning this matter. JFNCGiaf Attachment AFF00672 t 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 y E ;e•oe r~o ,Jtr~•Ilem, oute DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT PROPOSED 1994 BUDGET i I SUN 1519q? E Apenda No Aper,dalcer~_~y _ Cale 1-13 ~93 3Fz DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT 1994 BUDGET TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 - TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2 - BUDGET LETTER Page 4 - SUMMARY OF 1994 ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AND COMPARISON TO THE 1993 BUDGET PAGE 5 - 1994 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS EXPENDITURES BUDGET AND COMPARISON TO THE 1993 EXPENDITURES BUDGET PAGE 6 - EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES & DECREASES PAGE 15 - 1994 ALLOCATIONS WORK SHEET PAGE 17 - CAPITAL EXPENDITURES PAGE 19 - 1994 SALARY SCHEDULE DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT , 3911 MORSE STREET Tl 817 BOX 2916 t 'ie r,~ 1( DENTON, TEXAS 76202.281d ' 817.566-0904 5-0906 ~1 n June 14, 1993 Chairman of The Board Members of the Board of Diroctors Denton Central Appraisal District Gentlemen, The Denton Central Appraisal District's Proposed 1994 Budget for the fiscal year ending December 31, 1994 is hereby submitted to the Board. In accordance with section 6.06 of the State Property Tax Cade, the Budget is also being submitted to the 49 Jurisdictions that financially support the operations of DCAD. The member Jurisdictions served are located in Denton, Dallas, Wise, Tarrant, Cooke, and Grayson Counties. The Proposed 1994 Budget reflects a zero net increase over the 1993 Budget. Recent DCAD budgets have been met with demands to hold the line. In response, this proposed budget was formulated with a determined effort to minimize the cost to the supporting Jurisdictions. As a part of the 1994 budget preparation process, a salary survey was conducted amoung the supporting Jurisdictions. We f ound that the respondents to the survey gave a weighted ave That®Increaseywasincrease 0.166% greater;thfor the an the 3901/merbudget salary+sr. Increase in the DCAD 1993 Budget and 0.6661 greater than the 2.51 salary Increase proposed for 1994. Since the DCAD employees will be receiving salary increases that are certainly in line with the salary increases of the supporting Jurisdictions, staff believes that the increase will be acceptable tc the Jurisdictions, P,r , --Q cn1~c _ A~enCa'tem__ For the benefit of the user of this budget, we have attached a copy of the•salery survey. Also, we are enclosing a copy of a comparison of 'he Jurisdictions' tax levies for 1991 and 1992. These doctments are being provided so the user can compare the Jurisdictions' salary increases and changes in tax levies to DCAD's Proposed 1994 Budget. Although this salary increase will be welcomed by our employees, the effect of same, when added to other factors will place a substantial strain on the DCAD resources. l Since the Proposed 1994 Budget is a zaro increase budget, each dollar that is dedicated to a salary increase results in one less dollar for other expenses, The salary and benefit increase proposed for 1994 will have a net price tag of $38,752,85. When we add to this reduction the effect of inflation, the resources available for providing services become increasingly diminished. Further demands are placed on our resources each time that another Jurisdiction decides to begin taxing property. Perhaps the biggest demand of all comes from the ever increasing mandates codified into law by the the Legislature. Each year, DCAD's staff attempts to convey to all the Jurisdictions that tho appraisal district is the heartbeat of their ad valorem taxing program. We can only hope that the Jurisdictions recognize that we are make every reasonable attempt to provide the necessary services to ensure equality to the taxpayers and a quality appraisal program for the Jurisdictions. But, given the restrictions on our resources, providing an appropriate level of service is becoming more and more difficult. But, we will do the best we can. Sincere , ~ p e-4~ Joe Rogers Chief Appraiser J I t i aQB~dAN9 91, ApendaIto DENTON -ENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT Dace p~Qe 4 SUMMARY OF 1994 ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITUR AND COMPARISON TO THE 1993 BUDGET CLASSIFICATION 1993 1994 BUDGET BUDGET RRVENUESi FUNDING FROM JURISDICTIONS $2,358,125.12 52,3580125.12 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 920,000.00 920,000.00 TOTAL REVENUES 52,378,125.12 $2,378,125.12 I BXPENDITURESs TOTAL BUDGETED EXPENDITURES 82,378,125.12 $2t3780125.12 i i t D£NTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT AoBndANO _ Page 5 a(Jh~((oGIB Q 1994 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS EXPENDITURES BUDGET R12-~ AND COMPARISON TO THE 1993 EXPENDITURES BUDGET f DI ACCT CLASSIFICATION 1993 BUDGET 1994 BUDGET 5117 SALARIES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,225,128.52 $1,261,431.73 5119 SOCIAL SECURITY (FICA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84,693.18 87,346.40 5120 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125,899.22 135,247.58 5121 RETIREMENT (TCDRS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63,274.83 51,'88.28 5123 LONGEVITY PAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,756.00 13,380.00 5124 AUTO EXPENSE RED43URSEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118,188.00 1181188.00 5125 WCRKERS' COMP INSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,896.69 210507.30 5126 GENERAL INSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,134.00 15,913.00 5127 AUDIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,350.00 4,530.00 5128 LEGAL SERVICES. . . . . . . . . . . . 85,000.00 70,000.00 5129 OIL, GAS, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL, AND UTILITY VALUATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,7"1.00 21,750.00 5130 DEEDS, SALES, AND VALUE INFORMATION . . . . . . . . 29,422.76 31,106.46 5132 PRINTING SERVICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37,256.69 43,706.69 5133 OFFICE SUPPLIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44,915.00 42,135.78 5134 FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,759.00 250208.80 5135 OFFICE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE. . . . . . . . . . . . 9,200.00 9,200.00 5136 DATA PROCESSING MAINTENANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . 100,485.20 85,994.20 5137 MEMBERSHIPS, SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES . . . . . . . 7,076.45 8,196.45 5138 TRAINING - SCHOOLS, CONFERENCES, AND TRAVEL . . . . 23,285.00 23,688.31 5139 POSTAGE & FREIGHT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67,068.00 67,088.00 5141 LEGAL NOTICES & ADVERTISING . . . . . . . . . . . . 90520.00 4,000.00 5143 ELECTRICITY, WATER & SEWER . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,920.15 31,920.15 5145 TELEPHONE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,708.44 31,035.30 5146 BUILDING & GROUNDS MAINTENANCE. . . . . . . . . . . 33,365.00 35,140.00 5148 APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,680.00 22,680.00 5152 CONTINGENCY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,000.00 30,000.00 5153 BUILDING & LAND PAYMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . 59,088.00 591088.00 5154 BUILDING & LAND IMPROVEMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . 27,000.00 19,679.69 5155 MISCELLANEOUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,605.00 61805.00 5156 OTHER ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 700.00 700.00 TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,378,125.12 $2,378,125.12 ■u~ouu~o rid ~uaruu aQ9~d8~4-""' 1994 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET u Pagy~~ Apnd;l(8 I l jj EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASESN,e423 c E E ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) ° - 5117 SALARIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1994 BUDGET ■ $10261,431.73 $36,303.21. 1993 BUDGET - $1,225,128.52 THERE ARE 48 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES IN THIS PROPOSED 1994 BUDGET. PRIMARY ELEMENTS OF THE 1994 SALARIES BUDGET ARE AS FOLLOWSt NOTEo AN DENOTES A NEW ITEM. (1) THERE I.1 A 2.54 MERIT INCREASE FOR EXISTING PERSONNEL. (2) THERE ARE NO NEW EMPLOYEES. (3) A HALF-TIME POSITION FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY DEPT. (4) PART-TIME EMPLOYEE FOR THE PERSONAL PROPERTY DEPT. '(5) PART-TIME EMPLOYEE FOR THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY DEPT. "(6) PART-TIME EMPLOYEE FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEPT. CURRENT EMPLOYEES' SALARIES. . . . . . . $1,242,431.73 HALF-TI71E EMPLOYEE, FOR COMMERCIAL PROP DEPT. $10,000.00 PART-TIME EMPLOYEE FOR PERSONAL PROP DEPT. . $3,000.00 'PART-TDIE EMPLOYEE FOR COMMERCIAL PROP DEPT. $3,000.00 *PART-TIME EMPLOYEE FOR RESIDENTIAL PROP D4PT $3,000.00 TOTAL SALARIES - ACCT t 5117 . . . . . . . $1,261,431.73 5119 SOCIAL SECURITY (FICA) . . . . . . . . . . . 1994 BUDGET - $87,346.40 $2,653.22 1993 BUDGET ■ $84,693.18 THE FICA BUDGET ITEM IS 7.651 OF THE EMPLOYEES' COMPENSATION. TOTAL SOCIAL S!.URITY - ACCT i 5119. . . . . $87,346.40 5120 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . 1994 BUDGET ■ $135,247.58 $9,348.36 1993 BUDGET - $125,899.22 THE GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE BUDGET IS FOR EMPLOYEES ONLY. THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT DOES NOT PAY FOR DEPENDENTS' INSURANCE. THE CURRENT ANNUAL BILLINGS FOR 48 EMPLOYEES IS ESTIMATED TO BE $2,908.55 PER EMPLOYEE FOR 1994, THE BUDGETED AMOUNT REPRESENTS AN INCREASE OF APPROXIMATELY 7.41 FOR GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE, TOTAL GROUP HEALTH INS - ACCT 0 5120 . . . . $135,247.58 r-s--sr--■• 1994 APPRAISAL OPERATICNS BUDGET an^rtok0 A, PT, Q3Faqe 7 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITUR';S, INCREASES AND DECREASES 00t,1 .~yy INC` L4(' ACCT CLASSIFICATION ACCOUNT OR TOTAL (DECREASED) 5121 RETIREMENT (TCDRS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1994 BUDGET - $51,488.28 ($11,786.55) 1993 BUDGET ■ $63,274.83 THE RETIREMENT EXPENSE IS 4.10% OF GROSS PAY FOR ALL FULL-TIME PERSONNEL. TOTAL RETIREMENT - ACCT N 5121 $51,488,28 5123 LONGEVITY PAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1994 BUDGET - $13,380.00 $1,624.00 1993 BIDGET = $11,756.00 EACH EMPLOYEE'S LONGEVITY PAY IS $4 PER MONTH FOR EACH YEAR OF SERVICE. THE BUDGET INCREASE IS DUE TO THE ACCRUAL OF THIS BENEFIT TO EMPLOYEES HIRED BEFORE THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINS. AN EMPLOYEE HIRED DURING THE FISCAL YEAR WILL NOT BE ELIGIBLE FOR THIS BENEFIT DURING THE FISCAL YEAR. TOTAL LONGEVITY PAY - ACCT A 5123. . . . . . $13,380.00 $124 AUTO EXPENSE RE.[1BURSEMENT . . . . . . . . . 1994 BUDGET • $1180188.00 $0.00 1993 BUDGET ■ $1181188.00 THIS BUDGET ITCH IS TO COMPENSATE EMPLOYEES FOR THE USE OF THEIR PRIVATELY OWNED VEHICLES USED DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THEIR RESPONSIBILITIEU. TOTAL AUTO EXPENSE REM - ACCT it 5124 . . . $1180188.00 5125 WORKERS' COMP INSURANCE. . . . . . . . . . , 1994 BUDGET . $21,507.30 $610.61 1993 BUDGET ■ $20,896,69 THE INCREASE IS DUE TO THE INCREASED SALARY AND LONGEVITY COST AND TWA (2) IDDITIONAL PART TIME EMPLOYEES. TOTAL WORKERS' COMP INS. - ACCT 9 5125 S-1,507.30 a. qU 1994 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET Agenda No A Ll Page g Aflerdal~t~er►r EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECF,EASESCU(B. CREASED ACCOUNT OR A'CT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) 5126 GENERAL INSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1994 BUDGET - $15,913.00 $779.00 1993 BUDGET ■ $15,134.00 THE GENERAL INSURANCE BUDGET ITEM IS COMPRISED OF THE FOLLOWINGi (1) PUILDING, CONTENTS, ETC. . . . . . . . $4,541.00 (2) BOND INSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . $14569.00 (3) COMPUTER EQUIPMENT . . . . . . . . $2,802.00 (4) PUBLIC OFFICAL LIABILITY . . . . . . . $40800.00 (5) VALUABLE PAPERS. . . . . . . . . . . . $1,300.00 (6) EMPLOYEES DISHONESTY BONDS . . . . . . $650.00 (7) NOTARY REGISTRATION. . . . . . . . . . $251.00 TOTAL GENERAL INSURANCE - ACCT N 5126. $15,913.00 wwwwwwwwww 5127 AUDIT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1994 BUDGET w $4,500.P0 $150.00 1993 BUDGET ■ 54,350,00 THIS BUDGET ITEM IS FOR 1+9M MANDATED AMrJAL INDEPENDENT AUDIT. THIS ITEM IS BErAL; INCREASED A MINOR AMOUNT. TOTAL AUDIT - 1,CCT N 5127. . . . . . . . . . $4,500.00 wwwwwwww■ 5128 LEGAL SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1994 BUDGET a $70,000.00 ($15,000,00) 1993 BUDGET ■ $85,000.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM Id CHARGED FOR ALL LEGAL EXPENSES ASSOCIATED WITH DEFENDING VALUES. TOTAL LEGAL SERVICES - ACCT $ 5:;8 $70,000.00 wwwwwwwwwa 5129 OIL, GAS, AND UTILITY VALUATION. . . . . . . 1994 BUDGET a $21,750.00 $0,00 1993 BUDGET ■ $21050.00 THIS LINE ITEM 13 BEING BUDGETED THE SAME AS 1993. THIS ITEM IS CONTRACTED FOR A TWO YEAR PERIOD AND HILL BE REBID FOR 1994 AND 1995. THE 1993 CONTRACT IS FOR $21,750. TOTAL VALUATION SERVICES - ACCT 0 5129 . . . $21,150.00 ■wwrwuo■ 1994 APPRAISAL OPERATI04S BUDGET '0','iga Np 9 'Q EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASE.' rtlD DECREASES +`lanpd,l~m tUi6.. (IQ CREASED ACCT ACCOUNT OR CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECP.EASED) $130 DEED, SALES, AND VALUE INFORMATION . . . . . 1994 BUDGET - $31,106.46 $1,683.70 1993 BUDGET ■ $29,422.76 THIS BUDGET ITEM IS COMPRISED OF THE PRIMARY SOURCES OF VALUE INFORMATION. TOTAL VALUE INFORMATION - ACCT 0 5130. . . . $31,106.46 5132 PRINTING SERVICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1994 BUDGET ■ $43,706.69 $6,450.00 1993 BUDGET - $37,256.69 THIS .ACCOUNT IS CHARGED FOR ALL ITEMS THAT ARE PRINTED. TOTAL PRINTING SERVICES - ACCT k 5132. . . . $43,706.69 5133 OFFICE SUPPLIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1994 BUDGET m $42,135.78 ($2079.22) 1993 BUDGET • $44,915.00 THE OFFICE SUPPLY BUDGET IS COMPRISED OF EXPENSES LNCURRED FOR TRADITIONAL OFFICE SUPPLY ITEMS. TOTAL OFFICE SUPPT.IP,S - ACCT N 5133 $42,135.78 5134 FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . 1994 BUDGET ■ $250200.80 ($80550,20) 1993 BUDGET • $33,759,00 THIS BUDGET SECTION IS USED TO PURCHASE ADDITIONAL AND REPLACEMENT OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT. TOTAL FURNITURE & EQUIPT, - ACCT 0 5134. . . $25,208.80 5135 OFFICE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE . . . . . . . . 1994 BUDGET - $9,200.00 $0.00 1993 BUDGET - $9,200.00 HAINTENANCE OF ALL OFFICE EQUIPMENT EXCEPT FOR TAE PERSONAL COMPUTERS, THE PRIMARY COMPUTER AND COMPUTER PERIPHERAL DEVICES IS CHARGED TO THIS ACCOUNT. TOTAL OFFICE EQUIPMENT MAINT - ACCT N 5135 $9,200.00 t p 1994 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET ~genGaNo a 3 EXPLANATION OF lfarrL ERPENDITURES, INCREASES I 10 Duce AND DECREASES Q:.B[ ACCT CLASSIFICATION ACCOUNT NC TOTAL (DECREASED 5136 DATA PROCESSING MAINTENANCE . 1994 BUDGET ■ $85,994.20 ($14,491.00) THIS ACCOUNT I SOFTWARE S COMPEISED OF BOTH DATA PROCESS W. BUDGET r $100,485.20 AND CHARGED TO THIS ACCOUNT DATA SO~~TCE' BOTH ITEMS ARE PROCESSING WILL BE SHOWN IN4p gTOTpL COST OF A NEW COMPUTER THAT REQUIRES SIN OVC'ACCOUNT, MAINTENANCE EXPENSE IS CAUSING A TANTI NTY LESS IN THE EXPENSE IN THIS ACCOUNT REDUCTION (A) HARDWARE MAINTENANCE, 1' MAINFRAME & ACCESSORIES UNIX OPERATING SYSTEM COMPUTER, . 2. 1200 LPN BAND PRINTER $30,328.20 PRINTRONIX MODEL P9012, , 3. 1200 LPM BAND PRINTER $2,369.00 PRINTRONIX MODEL P9012. 4. 600 LPN S;M PRINTER $2,369.00 PRINTRONIX P600 , 8. TERMINALS $2,592.00 7. VARIOUS AND H&OWARE CONNECTIONS, CABLE $1,000.00 NOVISO EQUIPMENT. . , 8, PC MAINTENANCE SI,500.00 9. UPS NAINT6vANCE (EPE) $2,000.00 (B}• $31500.00 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE, D NTRACT pROMGN'~CE. , AAMNING EXPENSES $25,836,00 4• MICRO COMPUTER PRROOGWOAD PROCESSING. 58060.00 Rk4tINU. 31440.00 TOTAL D'P' M INT - ACCT M 5136 $4,500.00 $85,994.20 ffffrrrrff 5137 MEMBERSHIPS, SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES. ' 1994 BUDGET $8,196.45 S1,120,00 THIS LINE ITEM IS CHARGED FOR 1993 BUDGET r $7,076.45 SUBSCRIPTIONS, AND DUES TO EDUCATIONAL tDIAS' TOTAL MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPT - ACCT A 5137. $8,196.45 f■aff r■■f s 1994 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET aeondaNo aQCndall8ff Paq°~ EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES Q7i8 ~ O~ ACCT CLASSIFICATION ACCOUNT OR TOTAL (DECREASED) 5138 TRAINING - SCHOOLS, CONFERENCES & TRAVEL 1994 BUDGET • - $23,688.31 - $403-31 1393 BUDGET $23,285.00 THIS ACCOUNT IS CHARGED FOR ALL EDUCATIONAL RELATED TRAINING AND TRAVEL, THE TRIPS TO AUSTIN TO PROTEST THE STATE PROPERTY TAX BOARD VALUE FINDINGS ARE ALSO CHARGED TO THIS ACCOUNT. TOTAL TRAINING - ACCT 0 5138 . , , , , , $23,688.31 wasmse"aam 5139 POSTAGE & FREIGHT. . . . ' 1994 BUDGET a $67,088.00 $0,00 1993 BUDGET ■ $67,088.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM IS COMPRISED OF THE FOLLOWINGi (1) REAPPRAISAL NOTICES, WHICH ARE MAILED TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AND AGENTS ON MAY 15THo $55,500,00 (2) GE;lERAL CORRESPONDENCE, WHICH INCLUDES LETTERS & PACKAGES. , , (3) SUPPLEMENTAL VALUE NOTICES, WFIICH ARE SENT $2,000.00 APPROXIMATELY 9 TIMES 3,913 NOTICES f 5,23 EF, , . . , , , (4) CERTIFIED MAIL FOR ARB ACTIVITY , , . $2,00 900'00 (5) LETTERS SOLICITING SALES INFORMATION. , ,00 (6) SENDING CHECKS TO PAY BILLS . , $2r900-00 (7) POSTAGE MACHINE RENTAL. . , . . . $588.00 (8) POSTAGE BOX RENTAL (2 EA. 1 $340) , , , $688,00 (9) POSTAGE MACHINE MAINTENANCE $680.00 (10) NEWSLETTER. . $480.00 . 51,440.00 TOTAL FOSTAGE & FREIGHT - ACCT 0 5139. . - • $67,088.00 smaeffieffiams 5141 LEGAL NOTICES & ADVERTISING, , , , , • , 1994 BUDGET $9,000,00 (55,500,00) 1993 BUDGET - $9,500 00 THIS ACCOUNT IS CHARGED FOR ADVERTISEMENTS IN NEWSPAPERS CONCERNING EXEMPTION MATTERS SUCH AS HOMESTEADS, OVER-65, DISABLED VETERANS, AND PRODUCTIVITY VALUATION MATTERS. OTHER ADVERTISEMENTS HAVE TO DO WITH APPRAISAL REVIEW NOTICES, MISCELLANEOUS CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING AND INVITATIONS 'rli BID. ' TOTAL LEGAL NOTICES & ADVER - ACCT t 5141, $4,000,00 saw.ummum 1994 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET egolldaNO._L ENV AQC1G'anIIA P EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES DCIA INCREA~ W ACCT CLASSIFICATION ACCOUNT OR TOTAL (DECREASED) 5143 ELECTRICITY, WATER & SEWER . . . . . . . . . 1994 BUDGET ■ $31,329.15 $0,00 1993 BUDGET r $31,920.15 THIS BUDGET ITEM IS FOR THE DISTRICT'S CITY PROVIDED UTILITIES. THE BUDGETED AMOUNT IS REMAINING THE SAME, TOTAL ELECTRICAL, WATER. & SEWER - ACCT A 5143 $31,920.15 rrrrrrrrrr 5145 TELEPHONE, . . , . . . ' . 1994 BUDGET ■ 532,035.00 $3,326.56 1993 BUDGET ■ $27,708.44 THIS ITEM IS FOR THE DISTRICT'S TELEPHONE EXPENSE IN IN DENTON AND LEWISVILLE AND FOR THE DATA LINES BETWEEN THE DENTON AND LEWISVILLE OFFICES. (1) LOCAL LINES - DENTON & LEWISVILLE , . $8,110.14 (2) METRO LINES - DENTON & LEWISVILLE , . $8,375.40 (3) LONG DISTANCE CALLS . . , . $5,400.00 (4) DATA LINES - DENTON & LEWISVILLE. , . $5,799.24 (5) CONTRACTED MAINTENANCE. . . . $2,296.92 (6) AT&T LANGUAGE INTERPRETING LINE . $300.00 (7) MISCELLANEOUS TELEPHONE EXPENSE . . . $753.30 TOTAL TELEPHONE - ACCT 0 5145. . . , . . . , $31,035.00 rrrrrrrrrr 5146 BUILDING & GROUNDS MAMINANCL. . . . . , . , 1994 BUDGET ■ $35,140.00 $1,775.00 1993 BUDGET ■ $33,365,00 THIS BUDGET ITEM COMPRISES ALL BUILDING AND GROUNDS MAINTENANCE. AT SOME POINT IN THE NEAR FUTURE, THERE WILL HAVE TO BE SUBSTANTIAL FUNDS SPENT ON REPLACING PART, OR ALL OF, THE AIR CONDITIONING UNITS. NMt THE 1992 AUDITED EXPENSES FOR THIS ACCOUNT WERE $35,001.25. BUILDING CLEANING & MAINT SERVICES . $29,865.00 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE SERVICE. $5,275.00 TOTAL BLDG & GROUNDS MAINT - ACCT A 5146. 335,140.00 rto rurarr I I I 4.n i. I AgvdaNo i3--A2W- 1994 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET AJr1dala age 13 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES _7-'N ~ D ACCOUNT OR ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) 5148 APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD . . . . . . . . . . . 1994 BUDGET r $22,680.00 $0.00 1993 BUDGET r $22,680.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM IS CHARGED FOR PAYMENTS TO ARB MEMBERS FOR WORK DURING THE MANDATED VALUE EQUALIZATION PROCESS. (1) NAY, JUNE AND JULY MEETINGS . $181000.00 (2) FOUR (4) SUPPLEMENTAL ALL DAY MEETINGS $2,880.00 (3) FIVE (5) SUPPLEMENTAL HALF DAY MEETINGS $1,800.00 TOTAL "9P"1u SAL XWrEW BOARD - ACCT N 5148 . $22,680.00 rsrrrrfrrr 5152 CONTINGENCY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1994 BUDGET r $301000.00 $0.00 1993 BUDGET ■ $30,000.00 THIS ITEMS IS FOR UNANTICIPATED EXPENSES. TOTAL CONTINGENCY - ACCT # 5152. . . . . . . $30,000.00 rr c.wrrrrrt 5153 BUILDING & LAND PAYMENT. . . . . . . . . . . 1994 BUDGET r $59,088.00 70.00 1593 BUDGET ■ $59,088.00 THIS ACCOUNT IS CHARGED FOR THE PAYiSNTS ON THE APPRAISAL DIS4RICT'S BUILDING AND LAND NOTE FOR THE DENTON OFFICE, TOTAL BUILDING & LAND PAYMENT - ACCT # 5153. $590088.20 rrrrrrrrrr 5154 BUILDING & LAND IMPROVEMENTS . . . . . . 1994 BUDGET r $19,679.69 ($7,320.31) 1993 BUDGET r $27,000.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM IS CHARGED FOR VARIOUS BUILDING AND LAND IMPROVEMENTS. (1) STORAGE BUILDING - ADD 14IFT & STAIRS $10,679.69 (2) LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS . . . . S31000.00 (3) REALIGN DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE SO THAT DELIVERY TRUCKS CAN DELIVERY GOODS $60000.00 - TOTAL BLDG & LAND IHPR - ACCT N 5154 . . . . $19,679.69 srrr urns velva No, 1994 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET AQerL61IC Page 14 EXPLANATION OF EXPE?iDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES ll<I9 ~ACCOUNT OR - ACCT CLASSIFICATION TOTAL (DECREASED) 5155 MISCELLANEOUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1994 BUDGET - $6,805.00 ($900.00) 1993 BUDGET - $7,605.00 THIS LINE ITEM IS COMPRISED OF ITEMS THAT WILL NOT FIT WELL IN ANOTHER CATEGORY. REIMBURSING UNEMPLOYMENT (ITEM $5) IS BEING REDUCED BY $1,000.00. (1) BANK SERVICE CHARGE. . . . . . . . . . $300.00 (2) FILM & FILM PROCESSING . . . . . . . . $1,200.00 (3) MISCELLANEOUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . $11000.00 (4) COFFEE CUPS. . . . . . . . $180.00 (5) REMURSING UNEMPLOYMENT . . . . . . . $4,&%0.00 (6) SAFE DEPOSIT BOX FOR COMPUTER TAPES. $125.00 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS - ACCT 1 5155. . . . . . $6,805.00 5156 OTHER ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1994 BUDGET ■ $700.00 $0.00 1993 BUDGET - $700.00 THIS ACCOUNT IS USBD TO PURCHA5$ MINOR ASSe;TS. TOTAL OTHER ASSETS - ACCT A 5156 . . . . . . $704.00 someone Ag r0a Na DIWtCR CHIRAL APPO RSAL DIVOICT AOmial;0 1994 APPRAISAL BUDGIE ALLV.ATIONS WOlRBSIIT IkliE_~`~,g ALL 11MI6 All ISTRAIIS ~'Ip I Of DINTON OUT of 1994 1UH)SDI 9 TARLevy LIYIIS CIA938 CIANIZ ALLOCATIONS SCOOOL DISTBICTs........ 611 Amu ISL.......... 12,219,151.17 1.2191 (21,131,14 112 WHY ISD........... 1911,671,91 1,5261 !12,119.61 127,131,19 815 DINTOR 18D........... CII,116,122.33 17,1361 1394,421,95 112,119,61 817 HA ISO,,,,,,,,,,,,, 1949,139,34 1,5111 111,752,92 1391,411,95 $11 LAOS DALLAS 180...... 13,731,442.37 2,1161 146,171.35 111,7!1.95 119 LIWISYILLIISD....... 157,492,211,44 31,9181 1711,38S,16 171111,,171386..06 35 $11 Will RM 1SD....... 11,166,250,25 1.7341 116,915.51 111,903.32 SIl NORTHW86T ISO,,,,,,,, 19,151,526,74 5,1131 11.x,986,46 157,311.16 1174,314,62 812 PILOT POINT ISD...... f1,S9I,114,45 1,1555 119,618,54 1111bi2,12 41, 113 PORDIR ISO,,,,,,,,,,, 1619,151,96 1,3331 11,661,12 511.66 614 SANCIH 16D........... f1, 841, 99!,13 1,9911 122,179,72 11,661,11 . .22,119,12 SCHOOL DISTRICTS TOTALS 1112'149.116.11 61,2}11 11,317,692,41 169,131,21 11,,56,122,61 f29 411,113,82 GII DSNTON COUNTY 15,8121 1363,925,26 CITIlof C26 CITY OF ARGYLL,,,,,, 1224,111,21 111231 12,133,56 CI1 CITY of WHIY,...... 19245134 1,1511 11,141.31 $1,133,56 C31 TOWN PA HARTONYILLI., 1111211125 1,1131 1993,23 f1, 91.23 ell CITY OF Tel COLON 1 Y,,, 11,281,759,61 2,3121 993,23 CII too 09 COHIN1i...... 152,15 152, 961,15 lr56,243.SI 1.4111 19,3571.,43 15 19,351.41 C27 TOWN 01 COPPIH CANYON 163,111,16 1,00 1119,18 ell CITY 01 DORTON"....I I13,71i'lls,11 1,3755 1169,742,15 1119,11 CIO CRY 01 DOUILI OAR,,, 1151,$54,11 611551 11 1169,161.15 C17 CIT ,961,88 Y OI FLOW MOUND. 14,1840459,12 11,961,88 C22 t0 2,2516 1511116,19 WN 01 RACIBIRIY„ 151 1)6 1 111,$62,4I 1,1165 ' 9 09 TOWN 01 IICROHY CHOIR 1213.16 1243,16 Cie City 01 1IGHLAND no. 12,337,639,56 1,2571 121,421,11 13,236,19 C19 City OF JUSTIN,,,,,,, 1111,812,15 1,1611 110314,19 1211925,11 ell CITY Of ROUGIRYILLL, 1311563181 1,1161 $371,11 !1,371,39 CIO CITY Of RRUM,,,,,, $78,936.41 1.1421 1976,72 1316121 ell CITY Of LARI DALLAS., 1454,931,26 1,2451 15,629.13 1976171 C25 CITY OF LARIWOOD IILG 121,151.74 1.1111 1211,37 15 14.13 CI1 CITY 09 L1WISYI66I,,, 11(,868,197,85 511431 11)4,411,61 113,51 1134,562,$9 ell CITY 01 LRTLI ILM,,, 11351156,39 1,1735 .1,671,13 C23 CITY Of MARSHALL CRR, $1,711.57 1.4141 111,14 11,171113 C33 TOWN OF NOITRLARI...1 152,118.54 1,1216 1613,91 183114 C24 CITY Of OAR POINT,,,, 112,511,35 111391 1891,22 1611,91 CII CITY OF PILOT POINT„ 14311116,11 1,2321 151333,11 1191112 ell CITY OR PONOIR...I... 816,Ill,$] 1,1191 1211,31 :50211,34 C)7 CITY 0 ROAM. 1352,131,93 0.1911 14,164,63 1211,31 ell city OF SANG58..... 1. 1325,914,96 1.1751 14,132,73 14,361,63 C28 CITY OF TROPSY CLU9,. 1728,!!5.1! 113926 19,116,14 14,112,13 19,114..4 CITIIS :DEALS 139, .61,198,!1 21.4311 1193,233.19 181 .....:98 ..91:1.1;11 DINTCR CENTRAL APPIAISAL DISTRICT 1944 APPSAISAL EUDGIT ALLOCATIONS NORISHEIT ELL 71GURIS All ISTLIATIS 7a 1 GA 011TON OUT 01 1994 j~ 1192 TOTAL CCUNTY CCU$4 BUDGIT 1USISUICTiGM1 III LIVY LIVIIS CIARGIS CHABLIS ALLOCATIONS SPICIAL DISTRICTS VII CLIASCRIII VATIR881D AVTRORITY, $17,119.35 1.1191 1211.33 1211.33 IN7 CORINTI MUD.,......,. 1241,611.56 1.1311 12,919.51 12,919.51 III DINTOM COUNTY pIRE DISTRICT.....,....,. $33,619.81 1.1111 1116186 $416.16 Lll 01*9 CC MY LIVY IMPROVIMINT DIST 11. 111,711,14 1.1421 1973.91 $973191 NIS DINTON COUNTY MOD 12. $572,154.11 1.3111 17,111.81 17,181.84 RUD 011TON :OUNTY ROAD i UTILITY DISTRICT 11. 11,151,642.14 1.7121 $11,999.15 117,949.15 ill DINTOR CO 1ECLAIPTION ROAD I UTILITY DIST. 11,144,143.16 1.6151 114,155.92 114,151.12 11I1 LIEI CITIIS Auk...... 1111299185 111211 $416.21 1186.21 V13 TROPHY CLUB MUD...... 11,442,351,75 1.5391 !12,412.71 1195.14 112,591.12 NIB LAkI TURNIR M,U.D.... li,367.41 1.1131 171.71 !71.78 IPICIAL DISTRICTS TOTALS $4,59!,$11.48 2.$611 156,195.15 $195.11 156,941.39 68ARD TOTALS l186,112,795.1I 411.1114 $2,311,646,64 169,419.31 12,371,155.91 ySyq i 40nda N0. apeaca!lea#Kj _Pa- CAPITAL EXPENDITURES (1) DEPT. 1 - ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT ASSETS r 9 07' (A) FILE CABINET, FOUR DRAWER, LEGAL SIZE, W/LOCK, 2 EA. @ $129.99 $259.98 (B) BOOKCASE, 72" H x 48" W, 1 EA. @ S99 $99.00 (C) PERSONAL COMPUTER, 1 V. @ $3,000 $3,GM.00 (D) PERSONAL COMPUTER 24 PIN PRINTER, 1 EA, 0 $900 $900.00 (E) TAPE BACKUPS FOR PC'S, 3 EA. @ S500 $1,500.00 (F) OPEN SHELF FILING SYSTEM, 2 EA. @ $300 $600.00 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT ASSETS $6,358.98 (2) DEPT. 2 - COMMERCIAL DEPARTMENT ASSETS (A) CAMERAS, WITH DATE AND TIME 3 EA. @ $100 $300.00 (e) FILE CABINET, LATERAL, FOUR DRAWER, W/LOCK, 3 EA, @ $369,99 $11109.97 (C) FILE CABINET, FOUR DRAWER, LEGAL SIZE, W/LACK, 1 EA. @ $129.99 $129.99 (D) FILE CABINET, TWO DRAWER, LETTER SIZE, W/LACK, 2 EA. 4 $69.99 $139.98 TOTAL COMMERCIAL, ASSETS. . . . . . . . . $1,679,94 (3) DEPT 3 - PERSONAL PROPERTY ASSETS (A) FILE CABINET, 4-DRAWER, LEGAL SIZE, W/TACK, 1 EA. @ $129.99 $129.99 TOTAL PERSONAL PROPERTY ASSETS $129.99 (4) DEPT 4 - RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT ASSETS (A) HAND HELD CALCULATORS W/PRINTERS 6 EA. @ $40 $240.00 (8) 2' X 3' TABLE, 1 EA. @ $36.99 $36.99 (C) FILE CABINETS, FOUR DRAWER, LETTER SIZE, W/LACK, 6 EA, @ $109.99 $659.94 (D) BINOCULARS, 6 EA. @ $60 $120.00 (E) COMPUTER PRINTER, 1 EA. @ $1,200 $1,20e.00 (F) CALCULATOR, 1 EA. @ $98 $98.60 (G) ELECTRIC STAPLER, 1 EA. @ $58 $58.00 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT ASSETS $2,412,93 I AgaadaNo.'i CAPITAL EXPENDITURES AQbAG~3l(8 ~ta - (5) DEPT 5 - DATA PROCESSING DEPARTMENT ASSETSi O (A) OPEN TOP PORTABLE FILING CART, 1 EA. @ $199 $159.0a (8) COMPUTER TERMINALS, 12 EA. @ 5405 $4,860.00 (C) DATA STORAGE CART, 1 EA. @ $170 $170.00 (D) 300 LFH PRINTER, I EA. @ 54,000 TOTAL DATA PROCESSING ASSETS . . . . . . . . $94229,00 (6) DEPT 6 - APPRAISAL SUPPORT DEPARTMENT ASSETS (A) FILING CABINET, 4-DRAWER, LEGAL SIZE, W/LOCK, 3 EA. @ $129.99 $389.97 (B) FILING CARTS, 2 EA. @ $120 $240.00 TOTAL APPRAISAL SUPPORT ASSETS ---$629.97 - (7) DEPT 7 - RESEARCH & TRANSFER ASSETS (A) CALCULATOR, 1 EA. @ $98 $98.00 (B) HICROFIL.H READER/PRINTER, 1 EA @ 54,100 $4,000.00 TOTAL RESEARCH & TRANSFER ASSETS $4,098.00 (8) DEPT 8 - LAND DEPARTMENT ASSETS (A) 4 DRAWER LATERAL FILE CABINET, I EA. @ $369 $369.99 (B) CAMERAS, WITH DATE AND TIME, 3 EA. @ $100 $300.00 TOTAL LAND DEPARTMENT ASSETS . . . . . . . --$669.99 ' TOTAL FURNITURE & EQUIPT - ACCT @ 5134 . . . $25,208.80 `I 67Q3~"0 93;' SALARIES SCHEDULE 1994 Aa.nd Ilen,~L al TITLE SALARY 19 w 1.9 Q -3 A ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT: CHIEF APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $60,731,81 DEPUTY CHIEF APPRAISER . , , , , , , , , , , $49,437.95 DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION . . , , , , , , $47,972.08 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT . . . . . . . $29,246.26 RECORDS MANAGER. . . . . . . . . $27,449,50 SUPPLEhENTS & AGENT FORMS MANAGER. . . . . . . . . . . $29,561.00 COMMERCIAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENTe APPRAISAL SUPERVISOR-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY . . . $42,303,42 SENIOR COMMERCIAL APPRAISER. . . . . , . . , $30,213.05 COMMERCIAL APPRAISER . . . . . . . . , , , , $23,651.44 COMMERCIAL APPRAISER . . . . . . . , , , , . . . . . $20,015.75 COMMERCIAL APPRAISER . . $23,651.44 COMMERCIAL APPRAISER (HALF TIME EMPLOYEB)• . . . . . $10,000,00 INFORMATION SPECIALIST . . . . . . . . . . , . $17,601,90 APPRAISAL ASSISTANT (PART-TIME). . . . . . . . . . . . $3,000,00 LAND DEPARTMENT: APPRAISAL SUPERVISOR - LAND. . . . . , . . . . $45,100,00 SENIOR LAND APPRAISER . . . . . . , , , $31,433.33 LAND APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $25,143.47 PERSONAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT: APPRAISAL SUPERVISOR-PERSONAL PROPERTY . . . . . . $380180.9. SENIOR APPRAISER-PERSONAL PROPERTY . . . . , , , , . , $29,587.82 PERSONAL PROPERTY APPRAISER. . . . . . . . . . $19,678.93 PERSONAL PROPERTY APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $24,635.96 INFORMATION SPECIALIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $150989.56 APPRAISAL ASSISTANT (PART-TIME). . . . . . . . . . . . $3,000.00 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT: APPRAISAL SUPERVISOR-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. . . . . . . $38,921.32 SENIOR APPRAISER-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. . . . . . . $28,297.94 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . . . $24,115.74 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . . . $23,659.49 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . . . $20,015.75 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER . . . . . . . . $23,651.44 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER . , . , , , , , , , , . $19,362.11 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER . . . . . . . . . . $18,305.98 APPRAISAL SUPPORT CLERK . . . . . . . . . . . . . $140867.26 INFORMATION SPECIALIST . , , , , , , , , , , , , , $15,989.56 APPRAISAL ASSISTANT (PART-TIME). . . . . . . . . . . . $3,000.00 APPRAISAL SUPPORT DEPARTMENT: APPRAISAL SUPPORT MANAGER. . . . . , . $42,303.42 SENIOR APPRAISAL SUPPORT & COLLECTION CLERK, . . , . . $22,601.25 SENIOR APPRAISAL SUPPORT & COLLECTION CLERK/S0. OFFICE $22,601.25 APPRAISAL SUPPORT & COLLECTION CLERK-I . . . . . . . , $20,520.37 APPRAISAL SUPPORT & COLLECTION CLERK . . . . . , , $13,1W. 17 APPRAISAL SUPPORT & COLLECTION CLERK . , , . . . . $13,180.17 APPRAISAL SUPPORT & COLLECTION CLERK/S0. OFFICE. . . . $13,180.17 APPRAISAL SUPPORT & COLLECTION CLERK/SO. OFFICE. $13,180.17 RECEPTIONIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $15,179.89 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE it CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE aQendaNo DATA PROCESSING PERSONNELS ~Qtfdall6 DATA PROCESSING MANAGER. . . ~3iB~I SENIOR INFORMATION SPECIALIST. . . . . . . ' ' ' ' • ' $41,075 29 nn nn MICROCOMPUTER SPECIALIST . . . . ' ' ' ' ' ' ' . $23,235.70 ofef~ ' $23,469.20 RESEARCH & TRANSFER PERSONNELi RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECH III SENIOR RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECH II , , ' ' ' ' ' • . • $30,116.99 RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECHNICIAN I . . . , . ' ' ' ' ' ' $21,138,63 RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECWICIAN I . ' ' ' ' ' ' ' $17,910.00 RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECHNICIAN I . . . . . • ' ' ' ' . $17,910.00 RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECHNICIAN I . . , ' ' ' $16,534.24 $15,340.68 TOTAL $1,261,431.73 i i I i I 994 BUDOETIS^-ARY "VEY Veda No 0625,93 a}, ~e 0 tow ---6A Qty of Autrey 19ud0eled - 7% f 1016 7.0A 0.044b ~r aamW by earvo en baws of pw V VWA 0 3 to 746 City Of ft coiony 0 0.076 0.0)6 204'36 0,0036 0.00% City of c"th Employee 4omp1e1nq Probation - 3% 1076 3.06 0.36% 0.01% 0.0196 CityafDenbn Increase based on prfornrnc6mairm0104% 0.0% 4.06 7,06% 000a6 02696 T~ of Ftmr Mound Cast of Nng a*stmerd (ovie) - 25% 25% 5.0% 224% 006% 0.11 % MOM pay bawd on Mara - 2.5% City of Mghknd We" Awooe pay sense ft olly 3% 3.0% 3.076 1.2*% 0.046 0,04% ayolawon. 1% 3.0% 3.0% 000% 000% 000% Qaofl4un NoSoloryinawaforIM-Im 0.0% 0.076 0.069E 0WX 0.00% WyoILAkowas Mominaease-3% 30% 3016 0.22% 0.01% 0tyofL*WwI1* OsMndngan psAaman4snaluebonming- 2.0% 4.0% 5.964 012% 024% Moats sW dada of axc"ds standords - 2%r 4% at, 4' title Elm Salary Inaroose - 0% 0.0% 0,06 0.07% 000% 0.00% Fle4el yew 6A,ti4 thru 6,01,10 CityofPoot" 1% 30% 3016 0.16% 6M% 00A TowtofPonder 0 010% 0.06 0.01% 0.006 0.006 ayef Sanger 2% 2.06 x0% 0.17% 0.0076 0.005 City ofAovoko P6gulsremploys" -7% 7.0% 3.0% 0,17% 0.01% 0,01% Dsprtmwnor Sup"sors - e% Tom of Makary Crook 0 0.0% 0,076 0.13% 0.00% 0,00% Town ofMrslW Crook 0 ov% 0.0% 0.00% 0.006 0.00% dtyol QW Point 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.046 0.00% 0.00% agrof Arp la City seralry -10 b 21.000 Pat IM4 wal oltkers - 07.60 to 7.76 • 3A% • 31.0% 0.17% 0.W16 0.00% Po9co Chief 21.16010 23276 Courtly olrk 013,71 to 14,742 Town of Copper Canyon 0 0.0% 0.076 4.00% 0,00% 0,00% Tom of Trophy CIvb TOW bass WerIN In WO190 - 4% 4.0% 4.096 0.37% 0.01% 0.01% hen allooaled PaoenY84Is bated" merit Tom of DoWo Oak 0 0.0% 0,096 0.06% 000% 0.006 Town of 4artenslla Tewn 6srwry Mr., N 00 Te 6,+00 pr rep der hews • 26•% 4" . 0.4496 0,00% 0.00% Fan M00lof'r-OW a (auwwwp) to "SO Per how Tom ofNortkko 0 0.0% 04% O.W% 0.00% 000% ArM4 W "r '400MRIFrnpbyew(Tsasfws.PiMdpels,Ete)4% 30% 40% 122% 004% 0.06% Non-Pro9erlrW Mointomoo.CafeNri4,Saret.rlw,ek) 3% Dardcn'SD AA employme for 1092-1963 sehW yw 2% 2.0% 2.0% 16.47% 0.33% 0.33% U&4006.4190 AdNnlrtibrs 1 0% 1.0% 3.2% 1.66% 0.04% 0.06'% ?see! r.slA%W*y 32% LoMewllo L90 Sally snarrw 6r ht 1962-1603 sahod yw 3 b 095 3.0% 50% 3316% 1.00% 1.66% Uwe Om ISO W Ir10reaw 1990-1083 43% 4.5% 4.5% 0.67% OAO% 00096 No,ft"st150 Twchws-V,t4000 1.066 5.0% 5.19% 0.19% 0.29% OtherFmployws- 3%-5% Not Point 30 Praprolessionds 2.9% 2,9% 6.0% 004% 0.0]% OLb% Teacher Inane 6% f Se nger I60 Twehr Selry'Y"' Inorsess - 61 ,140 • K • M 0 6f►% 0.00% 000% Fend 6erwse Ne" eatery Rmfww 61 W Per n" 4A I we, iwg~ e 1 bJuiadcb~nII'lowin0 •WI[WudedinAvO. ODOGIT~94AItOCS.SSf OENiON ((X1441 41 PR NI SRI 0111AICi h' d Nf aS 9e 1994 1D6T1 A Ca Itorn tONPRRIDN Of 1492 AND 1991 iRS IEVIIS Lk,ze .21.3-TOTAL 1991 TOTAL 1992 1992 lociEASEJ q 21 TAMING EMILY: MITI L(VY COUNTY LIVI (DECREASE) (011AfASI) 661 DENTON COUNTY........ 121,112,12w o 179,111,411,32 11,119,311.(7 4,111 nal,aaau aler auauau r ran u alrnuauaa aura W4 TOTAL 1991 MAL 1992 IDCA1 I192 INCREASE/ 1 INCRFRS{f SCHOOL OIStilclsX SCHOOL t(VI(S SCHOOL Lt VIES 1DI(RIASE) (OE(REASO Sit AlIM ISO....,,,.,,, 11,111,213,13 11,127;192.93 1112,171.11) -6.121 112 AOIOEY ISO........... 1312,439,61 1313,771,21 111351.61 1.111 SIS DENTON ISO...,..,..,. 112,111,111,91 113,1111021.SS (1,191,111.61 1.111 SIJ MUt ISO.. 1215,116,41 13121116.11 111,961.33 5.751 Sol ME DALLAS ISO...... 11,111,712,01 $1 .691, 61439 I9iJl,l7l.ti) -9.511 919 LtiXTSVILLE ISO..,.,.. 111112,451.61 122,192,211.16 (14,611,241.59) 11.211 S11 LITTLE ELI ISO....,.. 1441,111,13 1511,112.31 191,311.A 21,431 111 NDITHAtST 110,.....,. 13,115,161.73 13,126, 221. 14 1321,159.41 91141 SII PILOT POINT ISO.,..., 1511,4!9.61 1666,I11. is (124,112.61) 1,116 113 PONIEA M.......... 1211,791.65 (216,141.11 1914,111 IS) 6,111 114 SAMIER ISO,......,.., 1149,111,71 1113,141.25 (164,321.17) LISt SCHOOL 41IIRICT TOTALS 141,119,921,14 145,316,651.16 (11,417,262.11) 6.911 al nnuaalua alaluuu nar aluunral ua Calla. (E1 SCH00L R(STtICT1: III ARIYIE ISO.........,. 1IMS1211. 41 11,221,11194 111. 511.54 1.f6t Ill MOEY ISO.,.......,. 1611,945.(4 1614,191.61 1111,14S.11) •1,911 M6 DENTON ISO.......,,., 117,951,139,31 117,495,211.11 (1S0,o31.17) -4,331 fit [RUN ISO 1137,121.11 1631,112,61 1691.11 1.111 III LAZE DALLAS ]SO...... 12,195,911. 21 11,134,1o1J1 (161 1243, 41) -2.921 EM LE4ISVILLE ISO,....,. 133,SIS,194.45 1351340141 it 1111111219.91 1.360 ELI LI11lt Ito ISO,,,..,. loll 1114.11 1166,115.11 14,961,11 0.61t III 0.9tNYE91 I11 1t,!l1,111.SS 15,621,111 44 9610,931.45 11 1131 112 RIOT POIN' ISO...,,, 11,142,S53.75 111181351. 31 (111,195.16) •1.11t ((3 0400I1 Ila.... ,...1391,314.12 1412,515.16 16,211.13 1.69t III SAIIII ISO.....,,.... 11,111,911.11 91,111,111.1( (931,14116) -2.011 CEI TOTALS 94X,S12,;ill Jt 16i,Ut,ItiAs It,211,75l.7t 1.521 u ualualaln aaaaauaalalrr rnua TOTAL 1191 TOTAL 1192 loll INCIIASEI 1 lo(IIRStj SCHOOL 0I5111CM SCHOOL LEVIB SCHOOL LEVI(s (OIMASE) (OECR(ASE1 101 ROME ISO..,,,,,,... 12, 215, 53S.33 lt,2491151.0 (126,311.16) 1,161 112 AVIIEI 110,......,,., 1!91,315,11 1!11,111.94 (111,711,11) -1,11t SIS DENTON ISO.........., 111,111,10 .21 131,111,111.11 11,111,171,11 1.161 SI1 [RUN 1ST.........,,. 1!32,11122 1149,119.34 117,111.12 1,191 $II ME OA M ISO...... 13,911,114.11 13,111,442,11 ($231,711,111 -1.111 Sit LIVISVIIt( ISO,....,, 160, 111, M. 11 151,492,111.11 112 .111 1911. 66) •4.111 SII LITTLE ELN ISO....... $1. 212, 915.11 11,706,251.29 (113,111,14 1,511 SII MIGHT ISO....,,., II,517,231,21 19,111,521 0 1161,211.19 11.191 S12 PILOT POiNt ISO...... 11It 1,III.it 11,591,191.45 {1 U ,111.46) •2.141 193 PONDER ISO....,....,, 1127.615.41 14 it ,111.96 f91,S24.121 •1,311 S14 1116ER ISO........,, It'911,1SI,it (1,641,195,13 (191,363.X11 •5,121 SCHOOL OISIA7CT TOTALS 1111,212,119.46 1117,149,516.11 111, 117,94 LJ6} 1.161 .u alauuuala ual alau ualar alalaau uaale ualal 4 , I U 0 1T191A1L0C6.3SF OIMttA C E 4 r 9 4 t 9PIRAISAI DISTAIff HQ911O ND-- - 1991 IU06II 111 1 COAPA4ISON OF 1992 AND 1991 TAT tFVIiS 10141 I I I I TOTAL 199, 07 tIillS; MM [(VIES 1992 INtREASt! 1 INCREISII CITIES LEVIES (DECIEA$I (OFt1f1SE1 (Ii city of 111YIE. t1i CITY 0F 4UINEY,..,,,, 1211,511.95 1719,111,21 fI1,5rf.tA) -1,161 CIL CITY OF IAt101VItL1 „ 111,162.11 1l2,SfI,SI is, 111.51 ((1,913.11 S.itt C City Of THCOLONY 1I,9,311.1i 1661211.15 115,211,42 23.12t tll TOWN OF CORIAtN.,„ 11,211,159,61 1763,271.15 9,211 fti YOUR OF COPPER CANYON 1151,13(.{S IT 16,211, 51 13,696. if 1,191 CIS CItY OF ofNtON,,...,, ,1.11 163,121.16 lil,Ill.li 11A 131 II T1 0F 00UILE DAL,, 11!{151,119,51 SI1,1f1,115.29 $231,511 21 1,1.1 161 tlTy -0f FLOWER 406100. 11, 120,611.11 11511 $54. 14 15,131.11 3.621 522 10WI II NACIIIIIY.... ,A, 111, 459, 11 1363,111.12 9,521 ttI IOWA OF NICIOII CREEK 111,611,11 (11,512,11 1114,32) •1,311 ell CITY Of N16NLAA0 Vllt ,111,5!1.11 12 1261,5!1.61 (15,115.21) •1.241 ell CITY OF MITI....... ,111,135,91 12,731,139.1i $121,113,51 11!,111.91 1111,112.86 11.196 CII CITY OF NRV6ERVIlI2 , $27,715,71 131,16Ea9 1145( ell IIIf 0F [RUN,,,,,,,,, 131,6IT . 17 12,111,51 11.141 ell CITY OF LANE DAl1AS„ 1442,111.11 111,131,11 021,241.111 •21,121 (26 City OF LA,IWOOD VIIL 121,191.41 $354,!31 21 112,114.26 2,761 112 CITY OF LEWIf911LE,,. 111,11),112,11 111,151.71 (12,931.66) •11,161 C13 City Of IITT[F FLA... 11111611113.15 ($131,511 31) •1,111 (1) CITY If NARSHAk CIE, 1131,92E 6f 1131,154.31 16,1!3.91 $8,181,1! $1,119.51 1.151 133 TOWN Of NOITNl6AE,•„ 151,211.16 114,41 1,551 C24 CITY OF OAI POINT.,,, 112,611,51 1161.11 1,111 114 till OF f'LOI Pil01,, 169,411,17 1125 112,511,36 12,972.61 1,211 CIS C(tf of FONDER,,,,, , ,111,69 1471,126.11 $111,611.31 32,111 ell City of RDANDIE,,,, 115,211,21 $11,111.13 1141.19 I.llt ell CITY OF SAN61R....... $361,214.,11 113 $312,731.13 1210,611,71 141.211 CH CITY OF TIOPNY CLOI„ 7,5!1,11 1325,911.96 (111,123,11) •4,151 ,561,11 , 1121,511,15 , 111,ldl,11 14,211 CITIES TOTAtf ,ld,31S,1lI.11 13f,161,J91,s4 $1,61f,64t.11 1,111 Meat.,..,.,, .,...,..,t.... TOTAL TOTAL f!!I SPECIAL 1192 SPECIAL 1992 INCREASE/ 1 INCIIA511 5!11141 D1SYIfCiSi DIliRItT LEVIES OISTIM LEVIES (DE....... (DECIEASE) WE LAI[ CITIES All,,,,,. 141 Ml. so 1301211.1s W03 TIOPAY Me IUD,,,,,, 11,112,11!,41 11,111,711 J! ($I,SI1.11} •3,181 WIS 011101 COUNTY Noe 12, 1111,tif.46 IS1 MI,11 (119,11l.il) •4.111 W14 MAI C1111 WATIRSNFD ((112,114.91) •11,114 AUTNOIIIY,,,........ 116,1!1,11 $11,111,35 W11 CORIAFA quo.,,,,,,,,, 1231,151,13 1361.11 4.111 f11 010100 If FIJI DISE , 1231,119,51 $1,111.13 LT31 RI1 011100 CO IFCIANAIIOA $75,121.51 113,1(1,13 (il,Ofi,ll) 1,121 ROAD 6 UTILITY Bill, 11,116,197.11 144, 111 '11 tll HIM WAIT LEVY i111,51i,17 11,11( 11PAIVEAINt 0111 it, ,151,112 31 111,111,11 too OEATON COUNTY ROAD 6 1$1 ,971.311 19.111 0111111 01!111(1 11. $;,321,861,11 11,153,631.11 W11 till TUANEI 4,0,0. 11,11 $131,111,66 9.IIt $6,361.41 $6,361,11 114 IFMAL DI(TAIM TOT4tl 13,111,911.IS 14,511,11 tld 121,113.11 LS71 u. .w 3131 ueu n+,*. ,%6rd3ND IU96EIf90ALLCC6.SSF OENtON (ENf1Al AAfIAISIL 011tIIC1 Ad~,idall6~T1 , ►d9N 1994 OMIT ^ ' Q COAPANISON OF 1992 ANI 1911 TAN tE41ESt°--L"L .ZQ_ O^! Of o TOM till TOM 1912 1112 INCNEASEr c HAS11 TAi(MB EN11fY TNN LEVY TAX LEVY (O(CIENSE) (OECIEASE) UNION COLITM 321,112,121.71 121,41t,117.12 11,279,311.12 .1,311... SCHOOL OISTIICT TOTALS 1117,162,111.41 1112,111,561.11 (3k,132,417.1i) -1,111 C11IES T511LS 171,12S,1S1,11 139,161,191.59 31,176,611,51 1.171 SPECIAL 9ISIIICTS TOTALS 111561,911,25 14,591,441,11 126,(17,23 I.STI TOfitS 1111,017,512.41 1111,112,TlS,11 11,119,111,49 1,131 CITY COUNCIL 6 0 r 0 N i AgWINO 1t CITY COUNCli, REPORT FQBMT_ Dale ,...L l o IRO TO., Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM., Lloyd V. Harrell, city manager SUBJECT: US 377 at Roselawn RECOMMENDATION: Give positive recommendation of the schematic to TxDOT to be included as part of the final plans. SUMMARY: In public meting and input from owner up to that time in summer of 1992, this was one of the major issues to be addressed. Fir. Gilmer and Mr. Owens were both vocal in providing feedback. BACKGROUND: U.S. 377 is in Level I in TxDOT approval scheme. After receiving input, schematics are adjusted prior to proceeding to Level II which is Row purchase and construction plan development. PROGRAMS, DEt~L$TMENTSj OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Businesses in area, traffic, police, TxDOT, and cemetery traffic WCAL IMPACT: Long term savings in road maintenance, reduced traffic accidents cost at redesigned intersection which saves lives and insura ce repair costs. Rf4PEQ/FULLY S ITTED, Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: NameName/tee Approved: Name/Title ABEOO168/90 4 ~gendaNe ' Agenda Iter1__4 Late ~O D CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 7, 1993 TOs Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager FROM: Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering & Transportation SUBJECT: US 377 @ Roselawn one of the major negatives of the first preliminary schematics for U.S. 377 were the impacts on businesses at Roselawn. Acquiring the necessary right-f-way to tie the existing Roselawn into U.S. 377 would have easily condemned two businesses. The two businesses involved were 0 & 0 Tractor at 1230 Ft. Worth Drive and Owens Construction Company at 1216 Ft. Worth Drive plus the additional businesses in Mr. Owens building. Right-of-way in the plans would place Roselawn within a few feet of the front doors of each business. Roselawn has always existed at a dangerous location where it angled in just north of the railroad bridge. Line of eight problems and high speed exits from U.S. 377 were major safety issues. The Texas Department 3f Transportation received input from property owners in the summer of 1992. They immediately began to try to address as many issues as possible including the Roselawn connection. Realignment of the railroad bridge to increase line of sight to meet AASRTO design standards is included in the redesign. The Area Engineers' Office of TxDOT contacted the City asking if the Roselawn issue could be solved using alternative methods that were recommended during the hearings. This proposal would cul-de-sac Roselawn just past 0 & 0 tractor. Access to Roselawn would be from Acme to Bernard to Roselawn. Safety is improved greatly by eliminating the connection and routing of traffic (especially the funeral traffic back to U.S. 377 from Roselawn cemetery) to the traffic signal at Acme. We have contacted 0 & 0 Tractor and Owens Construction who are property owners of the al ngvBerna d between Acme andikose awn and sees no problem with the new ptreffie patterns. Approximately three properties in need of repair would have a slight adjustment of their direct routs to U.S. 377 which at moat would add 1 minute to their driving time. one enclosed sketch shows the TxDOT proposed redesign and the other shows thn now route to Roselawn from Acme to Bernard. A final note is that the Bernard to Acme road is in good to excellent shape, The portion of Rosolawn to be closed is a deteriorated piece of county road with only seal coat protection versus the full depth asphalt on both the former roads. All key parties involved feel this is a positive redesign that provides long term solutions. Ln~CZA-I- J rr Cler e W1566-8200 DIFW METRO 434.2628 1 r + 64k___ ' p ! r ~ ~ t • ado i li ti 444444 3? 1, ~ ~ jl, l t ~JD Texas repartment of Trans pr' MA N A C; p0 eox 306711 DALLAS. TEXAS 75221.3067 • (214) 320.6100 2624 w. Prairie, Denton, Texas 76201 March 19, 1993 Po IFIt", ating r6gw11 pad 7661 Control: o081-04-025 ROUTING - REQUEST Highway: U.S. 377 Please From : I.H. 35E ❑ READ To s: To : F.M. 1830 County : Denton u HANDLE ❑ APPROVE j and Mr. Lloyd Harrell ❑ FORWARD city Manager City of Denton ❑ RETURN _ 215 E. McKinney ❑ KEEP OR DISCARD Denton, Tx. 76201 ❑ REVIEW WITH ME Dear Mr. Harrell: 0610 , i In a letter from Jerry Clark, P.E. dated August 18, 1992, he suggested that direct access to Roselawn St. from U.S. 377 could be eliminated. This closure was to reduce possible damages to several businesses from the proposed widening. We have 1.,valuated the proposed closure of Roselawn and the construction of a joint use drive, and feel that from a operational standpoint this proposal would work. Please advise us if the City desires to close this street, as shown on the attached sketch, in conjunction with the U.S. 377 improvements. We need to know the City's preference on this so we can revise the project schematic if necessary. If you have any questions, contact David L. Hensley, P.E. at (917) 387-1414. Sincerely, ~l Claud P. Elsom III, P.E. Area Engineer An Equal Opportunity EmploVar t I ' .L ' wutu N / I ~ ~ +1NrS ~ ► Ku ~ ` I l , ~ IiICHLANO p REMXLPW s ~vE. t u • i Rwcwr 0 kr l l MC CORMICKi RICK G , d la ~ resrR L~._J ' s R,q wecsn[s g ~ 4 s v JICOUEIWE y4. WWraIM IFRM+nr. J8Y[S 00 n U. S. 37 T ; too~J rn FO t N za y it I PRn POSED • R;a1~ i lop Wo mom SAM OWN Not ONO O by ~ o O ~Ev, s~ D ~1eoPo5~D R • O• kj , CITY COUNCIL S . y er.efM 41 i to "e i i ApenQalt BOARD/COMMISSION NOMINATIONS 7 1993-94 AIRPORT ADVI80RY BOARQ SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL 1 Terry Garland Terry Garland 1993-95 Chew 2 George Gilkeson George Gilkeson 1993-95 Smith 6 Rick Woolfolk William (Mike) Stephens 1993-95 Brock ANIMAL BREL•TER ADVI8QAy BOARD BEB.t CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL 7 Bettye Johnson 1993-95 Mayor 1 Nonio Kull Nonie Kull 1993-95 Chew 3 Steve Meyerdirk Steve Meyerdirk 1993-95 Perry 4 VACANT 1991-94 Cott BOARD O? ADJUBTMENT T CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION COUJ_ NCI 6 VACANT Rachel Mays 1993-95 Brock 7 Bill Colville Bill Colville 1993-95 Mayor i E. Ray Griffin L. A. Wilkerson 1993-95 Chew 3 Rebecca Blair Rebecca Blair 1993-95 Perry 4 Rebecca King Rebecca King 1993-95 Cott BUILDING CODB BOARD i CURRENT MEMRZS NOMINATION TE$M Cow. 1 Ed Owens Ed Owens 1993-95 Chew 2 Cliff Reding Nicholas Eassa 1993-95 Smith I I I gerdaNd. .~~,,^dalle CABLE TV ADVISOR( BQM SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATIONf COUNCIL 5 Joe Holland Ed Bell 1993-96 Miller 2 Richard Rodean Richard Rodean 1993-96 Smith CITIZENS TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPORT COMMISSION SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATIONS COUNCIL 3 Carolyn Bacon Carolyn Bacon 1993-95 Perry 4 Doug Chadwick Kathleen Singleton 1993-95 Cott 5 Betty Duncan Betty Duncan 1993-95 Miller 7 Alice Gore Alice Gore 1993-95 Mayor COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE 3EAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TEgM COUNCIL 1 Peggy Norton Peggy Norton 1993-95 Chew 2 Sarah Parker Lisa Polack 1993-95 Smith 4 Dennis Stephens James McDade 1993-95 Cott 6 Jack Weir Jack Weir 1993-95 Brock DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TE$M COUNCIL 7 Don Edwards Don Edwards 1993-95 Mayor i Jim Kuykendall Eugene (Gene) Luster 1993-95 Chew AQa~GaNo q ae,~a~ico DOMONN ADVISORY gA D Wle2 3a SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION Tim COUNCIL 5 Dean Cochran Robert (Kent) Baxter 1993-95 Miller 6 Don Davis Don Davis 1993-95 Brock 7 Kathleen Gigl Teri Rheault 1993-95 Mayor 1 George Highfill Pat Will 1993-95 Chew 2 Don Hill Don Hill 1993-95 Smith la Bill Thomas Bill Thomas 1993-95 Chew L"LECTLICAL CODE BO AD Um CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TFBM COUNCIL 2 Stuart Cawthon Stuart Cawthon 1993-95 Smith 5 Terry Schertz Terry Schertz 1993-95 Miller 6 Trenton L. Williams Trenton L. Williams 1993-95 Brock 7 Fred G. Reed Fred G. Reed 1993-95 Mayor HISTORIC LANDMARx CONNIBSION a~EAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TE$1~! COUNCIL 2 Judith Abbott Judith Abbott 1993-95 Smith 4 W. A. Barker Bullitt Lowry 1993-95 Tott 5 Liz Bays Suzanne Byron 1993-95 Miller 6 Elinor Caldwell Mark Merki 1993-95 Brock 1 Rita Holcomb Rita Holcomb 1993-95 Chew 3 George Spuller Alan Smart 1993-95 Perry AlendaNo $y sjjljl 9eRV*_c!9 coMwl. TTEE Nte- yo 1~111 SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL 4 Al Barstis Wesley H. Stewart 1993-95 Cott 5 Catherine Bell Catherine Bell 1993-95 Miller 1 Dorothy Damico Ed Smith 1993-95 Chew 3 Linda Holloway Linda Holloway 1993-95 Perry 5r Carol Riddlesperger Carol Riddlesperger 1993-95 Miller 6 Gary Truitt Victor DeSantis 1993-95 Brock 7 VACANT Mary Morimotu 1993-95 Mayor KEEP DENTON BEAUTIFUL BOARD SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION COUNCIL 2 John Cooper Judy Smith 1993-95 Smith 3 Dick Engle Dick Engle 1993-95 Perry 4 John Enlow John Enlow 1993-95 Cott 5 Sherrie Etheredge Jean Ross 1993-95 Miller 1 Jeans Morrison Don Hayes 1993-95 Chew 2a Martha Len Nelson Martha Len Nelson 1993-95 Smith LIBRARY BOARD $M CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION I= COUNCIL 5 Dorothy Adkins Linnie McAdams 1993-95 Miller 6 Jean Greenlaw Jean Greenlaw 15:'3-95 Brock 1 Dorothy Minter Dorothy Minter 1993-95 Chew 2 Mary Jo Pickens Alex Finlay 1993-95 Smith Ac"daNo Asendalfsrr~ ZMES AND emn L _O.-_ SEAT CURRENT ~ie S s~7 ' MEMBER NQMITIQN TERM ~~~5 5 Dalton Gre.ory Doug Chadwick 1993-95 Miller 6 eurkley liarkless 8urkley Harkless 1993-95 Brock 1 Neta Stallings Neta Stallings 1993-95 Chew nANNI-_ NA AND ZONING gXKISnrQN UT 0B8ENT._ME_iacn NONEM I_ ON TERM COUNC~, 4 Richard Cooper 7 Ivan Glasscock 1993-95 Cott 1 Mary Evelyn Huey --T 1993-95 Mayor 2 Melvin Willis Mary Evelyn Huey 1993-95 Chew 1993-95 Smith EL~ING AND NECF~,NICAL n►+ BOA_s+n ~T S~IlBBENT_ MEMBER, NOMINATION{ TM CQmgCm 3 George Becker 4 Bill Burley _ 1993-95 Perry 7 Ted Lewellen 1993-95 Cott 2 Bob Sullivan Ted Lewellen 1993-95 Mayor Dave Reynolds 1993-95 Smith PUBLtC tlTILITIE9 Hn~Rn fim OMRENT M=fig NOMI_, NA O TEBM Qn=jL 7 John Thompson John Thompson 1993-97 Mayor I w f i A09nd9 M0. Aged It rec- ZEM SIGN BOARD OF APPEAL R ~~ie CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL 2 Gene Gumfory Gene Gumfory 1993-95 Smith 4 Frank Massey Cliff Reding 1993-95 Cott 5 Tony Soto Tony Soto 1993-95 Miller 6 Jim Tucker Dena Fairfield 1993-95 Brock CIVIL SERVI ORMIG SIGN BEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERJ1 Frank Davila Frank Davila 1993-96 Harrell DENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY aT OURRENT MF.MRFR NOMINATION TFi$M 7 George Hubbard George Hubbard 1993-95 Mayor 7a Warren Whitson Warren Whitson 1993-95 Mayor 7b William Wilson 1993-95 Mayor TXPA BQ%RD O DIRECTORS CURRENT dE= NOMINATION Ray Stephens 1993-95 Council ACCO0128 HANDOUT TO COUNCIL 7-13-93~ RAYZOR INVESTMENTS, LTD. 1204 w. UwrveeelTr Dm., 4TN rLooe 4`' X11 307 76201.1771 DENTON. TEXAS (917) 7N~7H ~ I Y June 2!, 1993 \r97 Denton City Council Mayor Bob Castleberry ~!1 Euline Brock Margaret Smith Jack Miller Mark Chew Harold Perry Jerry Cott 215 East McKinney Street Denton, Texas 76201 Dear City Council Memberas The article in the Denton Record-Chronicle on Thursday. June 17, 1993 has caused us great concern and distress. We urge you not to release the extra territorial jurisdiction you now have in the southwestern portion of Denton County. Raynor Investments has vast holdings in this area which we hope to have developed in the distant future. The hi3hest and best use, is development, would be for a large first claps planned residential community covering approximately 1600 acres on beautiful rolling terrain in southwest Denton County. We and/or the future developer would most certainly want to be a part of the City of Denton. An annexing by either 3artonville or Argyle would be a disasters and would seriously undermine any interest in a development as aforementioned. We urge you to continue your E.T.J. here so that someday we can all look forward to this property being a part of our wonderful City. espectfully, Fe ton Rayeo President The Raynor Company Managing General Partner JNR/adh