HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-03-1993
- _ ---_.T.w....
......Y.,..,,»....._,, a. .
FND. SCRIBED loxil " eNIZY Z"D "C~ AND
N $9 59 49 E 542.01 CYJIRi' x
EX. 14" W.L. 451 45' MWY~M►OMMA'
•~y z,~' urnirr e~s~->~ r
35' BUILDING LINE F-V oil Cf uiirm AOA^Al YO t rwl .w• P. www meal
CA8 aML i
w~ w 164 90' AO' ~ i
NO EX. 9URB Rti 20 R=20
>0 c%4
FOUND w
• ~
SCRIBED
X o w 1
4114 F I X. 8" SEWER r FOUND I
~ I J
SCRIOFD o ul $ $ 4
X,► low
8 $ h i
L - 171.57' "
y
R x 1436.31' SI) 9' 59'5 S 00
~J 1
A= 06' 50' ~ " 8 .9 15
R.
N 00" 43 25 E 51 54 . ~ VT
171.47
f
EX, s cue
I
/ C oaf M, Page 1 ~ I
i-
N 04 .8 4 . j F. i~
9.90 25' BU bINc L
- 4t° f 2 Bloc f
u
45' So
Oh
M ~ ` I
om.
Point of 0 S r
Beginning
1
p CURS
g 6' A
PR 'WALK
Y EX,
,
N
I EX. *100 16' f/rnITY £A$tME'NT
I1rXl O N1N% \ Cobnel M. Poo& l.4J ! i 0 5
CJ Y y~
• ' v
1 ,6A r
r.
50 20 0 50 1010
IY~YI`y, 1 ICY
L
Y
1
CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL
.s:
APPROVED this day of, w~.........~.~~ 19~
City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
YY W YA Yw1IU MN Y`Y YY Aii U.Y +M IM. Y~ YY} WI fY W MIMY ~ AiIIYY.Wf ~ ~ WY MY M hM ►Y .YY. f.W W J.1 YYI'Y.+.YW .YY
' Mayor, City of DOW
br bat YrYIAaIYYw.q.Y.Ww.YwWaY r~w«.i}M r~W.{4rw4r M. wr.w ww r~w.fw"*a, ~r:w w.wtif4
C1t, 5ertry: 44f`+r+Wo+~` +M+dd+Y..wMFa.rw...{~/.y+wMar.i.!+N+Ia.l.1.y....aq~..«yYMY~.Y'.. wYyr.rw4~+9~..+www.w:.r+IH.w .t.1.N^~w...r.. i..rw.....w~
r.
~MNI.YY~rv.(Y/~Y.YY1Y 14Y4x.Wd.swV~4~1'YY~Y.MY`Y~.W1M11.1~tMs.4.YM}~.Y~~J FML ~YIYFL.1}WY1YiJu N~/J~.~Y+MY 'V MY...Yi:Y11.w Y.VYM
_r
k t
}:1YC'M raa.+w .:::..,.y,. .w,. ..-.,....i .i.... ! .*XA.Y..Y+n~6~..L ae. ..r x,. . n,.. ...Y ,,.r. r
-1
i,
i.
d~ r
r
- y
1 ~
~ I
I 6`
r
I
k
saa ~ ~ ~
a?o
gIfPKNAAQT I J.1~ MµIA~~ I
I ~,N, HcBAQA .NN,IDE NqPa 615 600 00 19 91A1815
~ g1811Q1 1107
I
SF-7 ZONING 9f-7 ZONING I I
F-7 ZONING I N 9`4$' 09" E ( N 89'24' 24 E I a
to PO B SF zakI
75.10' 72.44'
S • 58' 15M E '15" E 144974,
I ~
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET --o
Exily, 44
i I -5 10 20 30 49
/ ExrsrrNc
I ' r HOUSE I Q
I 1
606 so.Fi6
A r -
sjs 1110 1' LOT I i
-26BOIN TNlb ARCANE I
I *YIS1rNO '1317NC BLOCK TO REMAIN 11 ~r hr !
QARACE ico"ITRVION I
I , it _ O PROPOS l
~APARiN
f
Cr 1211 A'~f ELM
I
` I 22" ELM
~ I
1
CA) ~ I FXISrtNO
' I HOUSE :1 1
616 90FT. I~ W
r -
I Q) PECAN
a
~ [ 1
y; 'q II O D
PE 4
Fq ' i
i 4
1
201 ~yy I L
24' DRIVEWAY
I AND FIRE LANE
I
Y
I M' '
! J I
< ~xtsFlo
a •EXIL hC ( j a 112' MO 12' MULBERRY
F7RE NY Nr I i_
I ~ I
1
I
ExrsrrNO HOUSE
' ~ANLEVER NH 620 SOaFla
I I , 1 i
- I
I I ~t ' 1 1.~ I ti I I fX11t1A0 Thence South mce South 89 degrees 53 minutes 41 seconds weer w&"'
25' FROM Wvt rofebaU1r and being V Uland Street a distance of 293.61 feet to a set halt-inch rebar, rsld .ar helna_Vorth
89 degrees 53 minutes. 41' se Bonds' bast. 6-51 f *@t ft~
PWOb1 PAOP08f0 BIDENALN CENTER OF PAVEMENT thwo N the eouthuost
-r'
U FINN e' SAN. Sf~N£~R~~ EM? _Q'._ 9 fast seat Of •.-_--rte . 1
Thence North
- + oast of And V
N I Streets A dit
L N s r~ E r f1 ..+I....,....r.w.r.~..l......«..w............w,...,..r ha1111419 u L~
w . r . w . w • r , wr , r . rl.' • r . . w . r , r . r • .r,.
V. ~r • r • W • 1 M •r • W • r- • r• • r • i rr • ,r • wi • w1
p~ _ _ The undoraign . 1
actual survey correct, and
Sf'-7 ZONING there are no
I Sf-7 ZONING UINC ,AP plat) that tt
LEGEND .}}49 APA and that fald 24451{ noted.
V
B-B - Back to Back 0000 low
B/C - Beck of Curb
BL - Building Line }
CB - Commune Eeamts CA*"
DE - Drainage Eeamte 1
OR - Deed Records rr
7A
FCP - Fence Corner Post 1 r
FH - Fire Hydrant
Flp - Found 1/2" Aeber -
FNC - Fence v I~
r~ FNO - round - Iy
LP -light pole OWNER / DE V ,5L OWER
MH - Manhole L
MON - Monument L
PO - Pape JOHN Cs JOHNS %R; ~~Il llhr--
pp - power Pole pool 9ok 1903 pia
pp - plat Records OENTON, JOAO f 201
AOW - Aipht-of-way
r
APA - Seal Phops Records
sip - Set 1/2' Aaber L
T/C - Top of Curb
UE - Utility Eesmto L Y W + i' ~G
UO - Underground . r~ A r
VOL - volume i
-A- - Center Line IMI
flf
-e- - Electric Line
- pence Line G _ 1
-a- - Telephone Line a '
1
I
1
F
` r
1
r
t 1
Y~ -
1S'
ti
l ~ l^ e•
u 4 u
[S 1
it
MEN 1
- rs J
o~OO~GC oQ0 Q Q~ C~O~O
O
~o D
:2 : g
O ep q
Mr0 Y t4+~~~
~~Oa000ab~0~~
.y
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
August 3, 1993
x
~gendaTlo. 9 : - oi~ Jr
pgandalt
Date J ' ' / Y
AGENDA ~ 4r / f✓ ~o
CITY OF DENYON CITY COUNCIL
August 3, 1993
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, August
3, 1993 at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of City Hall, 215 E.
McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be
consideredi
NOTE: Any Item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may
also be considered as part of the Agenda for the Regular Session.
5$15 p.m.
1. Budget Presentations
5:15 - 5$30 Introduction
5:30 - 6:15 Public Safety Services
Police
Fire
6:15 - 7$00 Transportation
Engineering 6 Transportation
Streets
Airport
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
August 3, 1993 at 7$00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall,
215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be
considered:
7:00 p.m,
1. Pledge of Allegiance
2. Consider approval of the minutes of the Planning Session of
June 25, 1993, the Special Call Session of June 29, 1993, the
Regular Session of July 6, 1993 and the Special Call Session
of July 13, 1993.
3. Presentation of a Resolution by Senator Jane Nelson
designating Denton as the "Redbud Capitol of Texas",
4. Presentation of the Keep Texas Beautiful, Inc. Awards.
5. Presentation of Yard of the Month Awards for August.
6. Citizen Report
A. Receive a citizen report from Joe Dodd regarding sales
tax Increases.
~gandaNo
Agendattem 6
gait City of Denton City Council Agenda 6
August 3, 1993
Page 2
B. Receive a citizen report from Julie West regarding the
City's Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy.
C. Receive a citizen report from Willie Hudspeth regarding
the city allowing water to be diverted on his property.
7. Public Requests
A. Consider approval of a resolution temporarily closing
Sherwood Street from its intersection with Mistywood
Street to its intersection with Shadywood Street on
August 71 1993.
B. Consider an exemption to the noise ordinance at 1207 W.
Hickory for Vision Ministries until midnight on August
12-14, 1993.
8. Public Hearings
A. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an
ordinance rezoning a 1.419 acre tract from Single Family
- 7 to the Planned Development Zoning district and
approving a detailed plan with designated uses for duplex
and single-family uses. The 1.419 acre lot is located at
the northeast corner of Frame and Uland Streets. Z-93-
012 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval with a condition.)
B. Hold a public hearing to consider the preliminary and
final replats of Lots 20 and 21; Block 35, Southridge
East (Phase one) Subdivision] inLL~ tot 20R, Block 35,
The .459 acre tract is located on the south side of
Gatewood Drive, between Ticonderoga and Lafayette Drives.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
C. Hold a public hearing on the proposed annexation of 23.25
acres located north of and abutting Ryan Road on
Forrestridge Drive. A-62
9. Consent Agenda
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval
thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations.
Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his
designee to Implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations. The City Council has received background
information and has had an opportunity to raise questions regarding
these items prior to consideration.
agenda No
Agendaltemr..,_~~
Nle_z-3 -9.3
City of Denton City Council Agenda
August 3, 1993 D
Page 3
Listed below are bids and purchases orders to be approved for
payment under the ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-
up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 10.A,
10.B, 10.C). This listing is provided on the Consent A,enda to
allow Council Members to discuss or withdraw an iter, prior to
approval of the Consent Agenda. Upon the receipt of a "request to
speak" form from a citizen regarding an item on the Consent Agenda,
the item shall be removed and be considered before approval of the
Consent Agenda,
A. Bids and Purchase Ordersr
1. Bid #1520 - Demolition
2. Bid 41522 - Civic Center Park-City Hall Sidewalk
Renovation
3. Bid 41512 - Water Meters
4. Bid 41519 - Automotive Filters
5. Bid #1524 - Asphalt Road Materials
6. Bid 41525 - Wire, Cable, Conduit
7. P.O. #35879 - J & M Equipment
B. Plats and Replats
1. Consider the preliminary replat of Lot 1, Block A
of the Denton Square Shopping Center into Lots 1R
and 2R, Block A. The 9.5079 acre tract is located
at the northwest corner of I35-E and Teasley Lane.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
10. Ordinances
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive
bids and awarding a contract for purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services. (9.A.3. - Bid #1512,
9.A.4. - Bid #1519, 9.A.5. - Bid 41524, 9.A.6. - Bid
#1525)
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive
bids and providing for the award of contracts for public
works or improvements. (9.A.1. - Bid #1520, 9.A.2. - Bid
#1522)
I
r
te r
F
~garldaJtam.„_._~~1
1ard _...~-.j _ 93
City of Denton City Council Agenda
August 3, 1993
Page 4 r
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the
expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of
materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance
with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases
from requirements of competitive bide. (9,A.7. - P.O.
#35879)
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance
authorizi
amendm n an
ent to the contract with Freese and Nichols for
preliminary design work on the southern extension of the
runway at the Der:ton Municipal Airport.
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an
interruptible natural gas sales and purchase agreement
between the City of Denton and Taurus Corporation for the
purchase of spot market natural gas. (The Public
Utilities Board recommends approval.)
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an
interruptable natural gas sales and purchase agreement
between the City of Denton and Highland Corporation for
the purchase of spot market natural gas. (The Public
Utilities Board recommends approval.)
Go Consider adoption of an ordinance amending Chapter 2 of
the Code of ordinances of the City of Denton relating to
"administration by revising Article III entitled Boards,
Commissions and Committees by amending Section 2-61
entitled "requirements generally"; and adding Section
2-65 providing for a limitation for terms of office for
boards and commissions) and amending ordinance No. 93-073
concerning rules of procedure for the city Council by
revising Section 8.3 (d) relating to appointments and
length of service on committees, boards and commissionsy
and providing for savings clause.
11. Receive nominations for members and a chairperson of a Special
Citizens Advisory Committee to study a possible sales tax to
reduce property tax.
12. Consider an appointment of an ex-officio member to the
Downtown Development Advisory Board.
13. Submission of the effective tax rate and rollback tax rate.
1.4. Submission of the certified collection rate.
r
AQrda No 93 -el-1
A~endaftent.. `
City of Denton City Council Agenda Date'- -93
August 3, 1993
Page 5
15. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
A. Receive a recommendation from the 191 Committee.
B. Receive a report regarding the City's Anti-substance
Abuse and Rehabilitation Policy (#108.12), Drug and
Alcohol Free Workplace Policy (#108.11), and drug
screening procedures and practices,
16. New Business
This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest
items for future agendas.
17. Executive Sessions
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
1. Consider action in Texas Waste Management v City,
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
1. Consider acquisition of property for the city's
landfill.
C, Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec, :,(g), Art.
6252-17 V,A,T.S.
NOTES THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO
EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHYCH IT IS
LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE.
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Nall of the City of Denton, Texas, on
the day of , 1993 at _.o'clock (a.m.)
CITY SECRETARY
b
}
Agenda No.
A~2ndaftem
City of Denton City Council Agenda Date August 3, 1993 G~
Page 6 l/
NOTE: THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IS ACCESSIBLE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. THE
CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE
HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN
ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY
SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 566-8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS
DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDO) BY CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX SO
THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH
THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE.
ACC00137
Vends No • Oz
Ageodallem X15 ~
~3o a'-~ -93
C/Tyol DENTON, TEXA& MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 660.8307
office of the City Manager
ME MO RA NDVM
TOt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
FROM: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager
DATEr July 29, 1993
SUBJECTt Small Cities EMS Charges
As communicated to your earlier, we have had our initial meeting
with the small cities, and we have discussed the disparity between ita
costs. and ha ve dia u sed how would be done and over whatetim
We have been talking about reachin parity
staff has made g Parity in three me frame.
this chain projections on what we think the disparitears.
y willTbe
9 year. With the initiation of the new ambulance fees,
we think the difference will be about $3.00. The small cities have
talked about the funding of that gradually. They have talked In
over
termsthree graduated increase starting at 750 and going to $1.25 rs. their budgetsaand fundinghabilities, They aareavery aagreeableiand
supportive of this a
parity. PProach, and we think it Is a fair way to reach
If this is agreeable to the Council, the 750 the first year would
generate approximately $13,000 worth of additional revenue. If
this is agreeable with the Council, we will notify the cities and
continue to work on this Issue.
IfwI canbanswer any questions or provide any further information,
Qhappy to try and do so.
4ck Svehla
Deputy City Manager
RStbw
AMM0031D
_g
all
C ITY
COUNCIL
01 0/
~A
~ O
~ y
d
O Ot ~
8
Agodallm
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES IatO $ `3 U
June 25-26, 1993 ( ,t/X,
The City Council convened into the planning session at 1Ot00 a.m.
at the DFW Hilton in Grapevine, Texas.
PRESENTt Mayor Bob Castleberry, Mayor Pro Tem Margaret Smith,
Council Members Euline Brock, Jerry Cott, Harold Porry,
and Jack Miller.
ABSENT.- Council Member Mark Chew
City Manager Lloyd Harrell welcomed the City Council to the
Planning Session and introduced the staff and topics for the day.
1. The City Council received a report from John McGrane,
Executive Director for Finance regarding New Funding Sources
and the Budget Priority Questionnaire.
John McGrane presented alternative funding sources to the ad
valorem tax. He also reviewed the results of the Budget
Priority Questionnaire. This information is provided in the
agenda backup materials.
City Council Member Mark Chew joined the meeting.
2. The City Council received a report from John McGrane and City
Manager Lloyd Harrell regarding Capital Improvement Program
alternatives.
Mr, McGrane reviewed the five year Capital Improvement
Program. There was also a discussion regarding the current
state of bond funds and how the funds can be used. Council
asked staff to provide information regarding the last bond
election for its review. The backup materials are included in
the agenda packet.
3. The City Council received a report from Betty McKean,
Executive Director of Municipal Services/Economic Development,
and Bruce Henington, Director of Facilities Management
regarding city facilities.
Bruce Henington presented an update on building renovation
projects. Mr. Henington also reported the status of the
Denton Municipal Complex which will include the law
enforcement and court activities, These materials are
included in the backup of the agenda.
41 The City Council received a report from Betty McKean,
Executive Director of Municipal Services/Economic Development,
and Rich Dlugas, Director of Parke and Recreation regarding
rxwas
VendaNo~
City of Denton city council Meeting
June 25••26, 1993
Page 2
Parks Development.
Rich Dlugas presented information regarding facility
development standards for parks and recreation. He also
updated the City Council on the status of the Rails-to-Trails
project. He presented the South Lakes Park grant resubmittal
and development schedule and alternatives if the grant funding
is denied. He also outlined the principal concerns heard at
the five public meeting held In April 1992 regarding the
expenditure of 1986 bond funds as it relates to northeast
Denton park acquisition.
These materials are included in the backup of the agenda. The
City Council requested that park dedication fees be
a future work session agenda. placed on
Be The City Council received a report from Tom Klinck, Director
of Human Resources regarding City of Denton Employee Health
Insurance.
Tom Klinck presented a brief history of the City's health
insurance and the current status of that program, The City
Council asked if pre-clearance was necessary before employees
went to a specialist. This issue is one that is under study
and consideration with the consultant working on the plan
design and renewal. Retirae coverage and health/wellness
incentives were also discussed. This information is included
in the backup packet of the agenda,
The City Council took a lunch break.
61 After reconvening, the City Council received a report from
Betty McKean, Executive Director of Municipal
Services/Economic Development and Eva Poole$ Director of the
Library regarding Design and Implementation of a New Branch
Library.
Eva Poole presented a status report on the issue of County
funding for Library services, Me. Poole also updated the City
Council on the status of the branch library project. This
report is included in the backup packet of the agenda,
7, The City Council received an update on the Fire Department
from John Cook, Fire Chief.
Chief Cook updated the City Council on Fire Station No, 6.
The city Council asked staff to look at the driveway
configuration at the new Fire station and library and to talk
with residents in the Bent Oaks Subdivision,
+ger,OaNo?
agendattem %'S
oate
City of Denton City Council Meeting
June 25-261 1993
Page 3
8. The City Council received a report from Frank Robbins,
Executive Director for Planning and Development regarding the
New Zoning Ordinance.
Frank Robbins presented a brief history of the Dentc-a's zoning
history and the amendments to the Zoning Ordinance since 1989.
He also reviewed the Zoning Ordinance Task Force process and
the proposed provisions. This report, as well as a copy of
the draft ordinance, is included In the backup packet of the
agenda.
9. The City Council received a report from Lloyd V. Harrell, City
Manager on the 1993 Legislative Update. This Information Is
included in the backup packet of the agenda.
City Manager Lloyd Harrell reviewed recent legislation passed
by the State affecting cities. He also reported that the bill
creating a Court of Record in Denton passed as well as a bill
that would allow Denton to hold an election for an additional
half cent sales tax to reduce the property tax. The City
Council directed staff to bring a resolution to appoint a
committee to study an additional half cent sales tax to reduce
property tax.
10. The City Council received a report from Rick Svehla, Deputy
City Manager regarding an update on the Denton Airport
including grant related activities and status of projects.
11. The City Council received a report from Bob Nelson, Executive
Director of Utilities regarding Utilities.
Bob Nelson presented information to the City Council regarding
electric utility power plant repowering, TMPA contract issues,
the electric utility rate, and a financial reserve strategy,
He also presented information regarding Impact fees for water,
wastewater, and storm water utilities. He also discussed
future issues that would be brought to the City Council
including fiber optics capabilities and opportunities, This
information is included in the backup packet of the agenda.
The City Council Planning Session was adjourned for the
evening at 5100 p.m.
The City Council convened into the planning session Saturday, June
26, 1993? at 800 a,m. with Bob Saunders, facilitator, presiding at
the DFW Hilton in Grapevine, Texas,
PAESENTr Mayor Bob Castleberry, Mayor Pro Tom Margaret Smith,
+gendaNo may- c2
4gendaltem..~S'~~ _ late 7
City of Denton City Council Meeting
June 25-26, 1993
Page 4
Council Members Euline Brock, Mark Chew, Jerry Cott,
Harold Perry, and Jack Miller.
ABSENT: Hone
The City Council reconvened into the planning session.
Council members discussed goals they had for the day.
Discussion took place regarding the difference between process
issues, method issues, and content issues.
Council Member Jerry Cott expressel a concern over information
that was presented by staff. There was a discussion regarding
budget reports and other financial reports. The staff will
meet with Mr. Cott to ensure he receives a report of budget
figures that reflect year to date actual totals and a line
item budget. There was also a discussion between City Manager
Harrell and Council Member Harold Perry to ensure that there
was continued communication between them.
City Council members discussed procedural issues regarding
City Council meetings. Some of the City Council members felt
that the work session was rushed with too many major issues
needing decisions during that short time frame.
The City Council outlined a new process for major issues. The
Council determined that work session items that dealt with
major issues would be placed on an agenda work session to be
briefed and discussed. Then the major issue would be placed
on the next regular meeting to receive more input from
citizens and give staff direction. Following the direction
given at the regular session the item would probably be placed
on the following regular meeting for official action. The
agenda committee will ensure that the major issues are placed
on the agenda in this manner. other non-major issues will
continue be placed on the agenda to give staff direction
during the work session.
The City Council also committed itself to meet the first
through the fourth Tuesday with the second and fourth Tuesdays
both being work sessions.
The City Council took a lunch break.
The City Council reconvened after lunch and discussed the
public perception of the City Council at meetings. The
Council discussed having the Mayor explain to the public how
often items had previously been discussed prior to voting on
the issue.
There was a discussion regarding the consent agenda. The
6
Agenda No y3- 4~
AgendaltenL S ~
Date
City of Denton city council Meeting J G/ S
June 25-26, 1993
Page 5
Council decided that wording should be added to the consent
agenda portion of the agenda that explains that the City
Council has received background information and has raised
questions about that information prior to the public meeting.
City Council requested an inventory of all long range planning
activities currently done by staff in ordinance document.
The City Council Planning session adjourned at 4:00 p.m.
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
CATHERINE E. TUCK
DEPUTY CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
AM400279
i
J,
C
i!
AgendaNo._
Agendaltem
Date
G~~r
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
June 29, 1993
The council convened into a Special Call Session of the City of
Denton City Council on Tuesday, June 29, 1993 at 5:15 p.m. in the
Civil Defense Room.
PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Smith; Council Members
Brock, Chew, Cott, Perry, and Miller.
ABSENT: None
1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing
the City Manager to execute a contract with the Missouri Pacific
Railroad for the purchase of the Missouri Pacific, Denton Branch,
right-of-way.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that this was the culmination
of three years of work. The contract would preserve the eight
miles of right-of-way which the Council had previously discussed.
The importance of this contract involved long range planning for
Denton and was not the fact that there would be a trail for
recreational use but rather the strategic value to preserve the
right-of-way for future rapid transit uses. If the City had not
moved to preserve the right-of-way, the corridor would have
vanished and it would have been extremely difficult to connect
Denton and Dallas with any type of future mass transit.
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 93-117
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO ACT ON THE CITY'S BEHALF IN EXECUTING THE
ATTACHED LINE SALE AGREEMENT WITH MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD
COMPANY FOR THE PURCHASE OF A RAIL CORRIDOR, MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A TO THE ATTACHED LINE SALE CONTRACT;
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT AT CLOSING THE BILL OF
SALE AND QUITCLAIM DEED ATTACHED A£ EXHIBIT B TO THE ATTACHED
LINE SALE. AGREEMENT; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR
THE PURCHASE OF THE RAIL CORRIDOR; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE
DnE.
Perry motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll
vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew
Faye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried
unanimously.
2. The council received a presentation and discussion regarding
the 1993-94 Major Budget Issues Report.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that this was the initia. step
in finalizing the budget for fiscal year 1993-94. The City Charter
indicated that the City Manager had to submit a proposed budget to
«r °
x
P
agendaNo.~
AgerdahR- k S ~ -
•3
Date
City of Denton city council Minutes
June 29, 1993
Page 2
the City Council by the end of July for the start of the fiscal
year in October. The policies would be presented at this meeting
with discussion to follow at later meetings. Harrell detailed the
schedule of upcoming meetings in relation to the budget discussions
and noted the attachments in the document. Attachment "A" - the
proposed budget was a modified zero based budget. Each department
had a target number to reach and anything above that target had to
be submitted to the Executive Staff as a budget package. Each
package was discussed with the Executive Staff in hearings and
following the hearings, the Executive Staff ranked the packages.
The numerical rank order was the building block which helped to
balance the budget. This attachment represented those packages
included in the budget. Attachment "H" included packages submitted
which were not included in the proposed budget. Attachment "C" was
the Council priority questionnaire and Attachment "D" represented
the general fund revenue summary. Attachment "E" was a breakdown
of the expenditure side of the budget with major categories.
Attachment "F" was a budget calendar for the next few months.
Harrell stated that the proposed budget was a maintenance budget
that only marginally addressed service level weaknesses. The
budget incorporated $137 million of revenues with expenditures
totalling $135 million.
Major Issues
1. General Fund Reserve Level - council traditionally had the
policy of maintaining a general fund unreserved balance between 8-
lot of the General Fund expenditures. In the last budget year the
City Council indicated a preference for a fund balance of 104. The
balance at the end of 1993-94 was projected to be 10.134. This
budget recommended a 10.134 general fund balance which allowed the
use of $527,000 to help balance the budget. Alternatives relating
to the unreserved fund balance included (1) allowing the balance to
stay at its current level and find an additional $527,432 of
revenue or decrease expenditures, (2) use $597,000 of the balance
as a resource to help fund the 1993-94 budget, or (3) reduce the
fund balance below the 10.134 level and use tho additional funds to
offset other revenues or fund additional expenditures. Staff
recommended utilizing $527,000 of the unreserved balance to help
balance the 1993-94 budget.
2. Revenues
A. Property Tax - the preliminary tax roll, submitted by the
Appraisal District, showed a decli:ie of $24 million from the 1992-
93 fiscal year final roll, including supplements. The effective
rate would be S.7320 per $100 valuations compared to the current
Q(JRn flLND
AGEn~~EtertL ~'s ~`.2,
City of Denton City Council Minutes G/
June 29, 1993
Page 3
rate of $.7180. Alternatives for the ad valorem tax rate were (1)
keep the rate at the current amount which would require a reduction
of $256,355 in the General Fund expenditures plus an amount to be
determined after appeals were heard by the Appraisal District, (2)
set the tax rate at the effective rate which would be $.720 per
$100 valuation plus an amount to be determined after the appeal
process, or (3) increase the actual rate over the effective rate in
which each additional $.01 increase over the effective rate would
generate an additional $183,111 in revenues that could be used to
fund unmet budget needs or restore services that had been
eliminated. Staff recommendation was that the City adopt the
effective tax rate. This would be the fourth straight year that
the tax rate had been set at or below the effective rate if Council
decided to proceed in that direction.
B. Sales Tax - the budget included a 3% growth in receipts
over the current budget amount. Alternatives for sales tax
receipts were (1) project less than a 3% growth, (2) project a 3%
growth for 1993-94 or (3) project greater than a 3% growth. Staff
recommendation was for a 3% sales tax growth rate to be used to
balance the 1993-94 budget.
C. Ambulance Fees - the Fire Department had reviewed the fee
structure and billing process for the changing of ambulance fees.
Their conclusions were that the City was undercharging the amounts
charged to other small cities and over time it was hoped that those
fees would be increased. A second conclusion was that the City was
not charging enough for the its ambulance service. The current fee
was $120 per incident and the average rate was $219 for area
cities. Alternatives for increasing the ambulance fees were (1)
keep the fee at $120 which would require $100,000 to be found for
the budget, (2) increase the fee to $363 which would provide for
full recovery of costs or (3) raise the fee to recover some of the
subsidized costs. Staff recommendation was that the fee be
increase to $200 per incident which would bring in $100,000 of
additional revenue.
Council Member Chew asked how much the city was subsidizing the
smaller cities.
Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager stated approximately $7 per
incident.
Council Member Chew stated that he would like to have hard figures
regarding that difference.
Council Member Brock asked for an update on how the ambulance
insurance program was working.
L
ACaedako
Agendalteal,- ~ -l
Date-
City of Denton City Council Minutes G/
June 29, 1993
Page 4
D. Park and Recreation Fees - with the anticipated
completion in the fall of the softball and soccer fields at North
Lakes Park, a major issue was lighting and field maintenance. It
was projected to cost $17,000 per year to light the new fields and
$62,000 to maintain them. It was recommended that the leagues
utilizing the fields pay for the cost of lighting. Each
participant would be charged $3.50 for the lighting and if
maintenance were included, the cost would be $12.50 per participant
per season. Alternatives for charging a fee for field lighting
were (1) not charging which would require an additional $17,000 be
found for the budget, (2) split the additional costs between the
taxpayers (maintenance) and the participants (lighting) (3) or
charge a fee for both the additional maintenance and lighting
expenses. Staff recommendation was that a fee be charged for the
use of lighted fields. Maintenance costs enuld be paid by taxes.
Council Member Perry suggested the possibility of the leagues
paying the cost rather than individuals.
City Manager Harrell replied that however the league wanted to make
payment to the City would be fine as long as it were paid. The
money obtained from this fee would be used exclusively for park
expenses.
3. Pay Plan Adjustments
Last year staff had recommended no increase when presenting the
major budget issues but Council came up with a 2.64 increase by the
end of the budget discussions. This year it was proposed to
continue to implement Phase II of the pay plan but not at a full
implementation. A 24 range adjustment would be necessary to keep
from falling further behind the area market. The second area of
compensation provided increases for pay for performance. The pay
for performance matrix was redesigned to better fit the
organization by shrinking the number of performance categories and
quartiles. The PRI increases ranged from 0 - 5.54. The market
adjustment plus the pay for performance would provide for an
average increase of 4.644. These increases would be effective from
January to April depending on the pay plans involved. A total
compensation increase of 44 had been programmed for fire and police
civil service employees to be effective January 10 1994.
Alternatives included (1) fully implement Phase It of the
compensation program which would equire an additional $364,000 and
the average employee would receive a 6.444 increase, (2) delay the
compensation program and provide no increase in employee
compensation which would provide a budget savings of $603,000 or
(3) implement a range adjustment and performance based pay
increase.
V
4
R
Agenda No
Apendaltem
Jity of Denton city council minutes G~
une 29, 1993
Page 5
Council
budgeted M and ears edl for atated that
how l this compared to had been
amounts. projected
City Manager that a small im ediateaincentivesefor exemplary serviceasu would include
Public Utilities Board which would be detailedgeduringy the
department presentations.
4. Benefits Adjustments
A. Health Insurance - It was anticipated that there would be
a 208 increase in health insurance premiums, effective January 1,
1994. If the increase were larger, an adjustment in the plan would
employees. it wasirecmmendeddthat a1201 health insurance increase
for the employee be funded. Alternatives for the increase in
health insurance costs were (1) require the employee to pay the 208
increase in rates which would allow $229,000 to be reallocated in
the budget or (2) fund a 208 maximum increase and readjust the plan
design if the increase exceeded 208.
Council Member Brock requested a discussion regarding moving toward
a managed care system.
B. T.M.R.S. Adjustment - The City currently contributed a
percentage of annual salary to the Texas Municipal Retirement
System for all city employees except firefighters. The
firefighters had their own pension retirement system. The TMRS
contributions were 5.768 City and 58 employee, of which the City
paid both. The contribution to the Denton Fire Pension Fund was 98
City, 98 employee with the City paying 58 of the employee's share.
The City paid a total of 148 towards the firefighters pension
contribution. State law dictated what eras aid employees. The police department belonged to TMRS ~rThere wasrmore
than a 38 difference between the City contribution for firefighters
and all other employees. The City's level of participation was at
the lowest level offered and was below that provided by many of the
area cities. It was proposed to adjust TMRS contributions,
effective January 1, 1994, to 6.768 City and 68 employee, at a cost
of $114,335. The City would not fund the additional employee
increase of 18. It was also recommended to include an enhancement
to retirement eligibility requirements and for an employee to buy
back prior military and public service credits. Alternatives for
funding the TMRS adjustment were (1) continue the current program
and contribution levels which would allow $1480955 to be
reallocated, (2) fund only the contribution increase which would
allow for $34,620 to be reallocated, (3) fund only the enhancement,
p
t
d
J
Agenda No
Agendalte
Date'- -13
City of Denton city council Minutes
June 29, 1993
Page 6
military credit and prior service buy back pro•risions which would
allow $114,335 to be reallocated, or (4) fund the contribution
increase and the program enhancements. Staff recommended the
funding of both the contribution level increase and the program
enhancements.
5, Positions - the proposed budget contained a few new General
Fund positions in three categories. Restructuring - 5 total
positions were proposed for the following departments: Municipal
Court - warrant Clerk; Library - Library Clerk II and Library Page;
Customer Service - receptionist; and City Manager - Public
Information Officer. New Programs included positions in Facilities
Management - Building Maintenance Technician II and Administrative
Assistant I, Park Maintenance - Light Equipment Operator and
Seasonal Groundskeeper. New positions included Police - Civilian
Jailer; Facilities Management - Building Maintenance Technician II;
and City Manager's Office - Secretary upgrade from 3/4 time to full
time. Alternatives included (1) keeping current staffing levels
which would allow $145,474 to be reallocated or (2) fund the
positions. Staff recommendation was to fund the limited positions
proposed.
6. Other Agency Contributions - the proposed budget increased the
funding level for the Human Services Agencies by 2.5% from its
current level. The total amount proposed was $117,305. The Human
Services Committee received requests totalling $554,734. Of those
requests, the Committee recommended Community Development Block
Grant funding of $100,000 and General Fund funding of $148,300,
Alternatives included (1) fund at the 1992-93 level of $114,444
which would allow $2,861 to be reallocated, (2) fund the agency
request of $554,734 which would require an additional $337,429 to
be funded from additional resources or expenditure reductions, (3)
fund at the Human Services Committee recommended level which would
require an additional $30,995, or (4) fund at a 2.5% increase which
approximated the increase in other budgets.
7. Transportation - the proposed budget provided for a 2.5%
increase from current funding levels for SPAN ($248) and HANDIHOP
($1,139) transportation services. With the 2.5% increase, the
total funding for transportation services would be $56,827.
Alternatives included (1) keeping the funding at its current level
which would allow $1,387 to be reallocated, or (2) fund at a 2.5%
increased level. Staff0s recommendation was to fund at 2.54
8. Tax Exemption for Persons Over 65 - in 1989, the City Council
agreed to help individuals on fixed incontes absorb any additional
property tax increases. At the time, Council established a goal of
raising the over 65 exemption from $16,000 to $25,000, The current
+gerdaho_
Dale
City of Denton City Council Minutes
June 29, 1953
Page 7
exemption was at $20,000. Last year the $1,000 increase was not
granted. Staff recommendation was to increase the exemption $1,000
for the 1993-94 fiscal year. Alternatives for the over 65 tax
exemption were (1) leave the exemption at the current amount of tilize an
$18 302 for increaseatheuexemption to $25,000 immediately and eliminate s$73,208
of expenditures from the budget or increase revenues, or (3)
proceed with the goal of increasing the exemption by $1,000 per
year, for a total exemption of $21,000 in 1993-94.
9• Fire Reserve Fund - over the past several years, a fire
reserve fund had been built to phase in the fiscal impact of
opening a. new fire station. The 1993-94 budget incorporated that
strategy and used $137,000 of the reserve to help balance the 1993-
94 expenditure required for opening Station J'6.
10. Street Improvements - the council questionnaire indicated that
street construction/rebuilding was one of its top priorities. The
current budget allocation was $1.5 million which would allow for
four lane miles of new construction and reconstruction of 150,000
square yards or about 120 blocks of streets. Because of limited
resources, the 1993-94 budget could not provide additional funding
for street construction/repair with current revenues. An alternate
resource that could increase the funds available was a solid waste
user fee. This would be assessed to the Sanitation fund to help
maintain streets for additional street construction/repair and
would generate $124,000 for the budget. Alternatives for street
improvements were (1) keep the funding at the current level, or (2)
charge a 33 user fee for solid waste collection and allocate those
funds to street construction/repairs.
Council Member Perry asked who would pay the fee,
City Manger Harrell replied that it would be a 31 fee assessed to
the sanitation fund. This would be an operational cost for use of
streets and not charged to citizens.
Mayor Pro Tem Smith asked if this would reflect in any rate
increases.
City Manager Harrell replied that any increase of rates would not
be in addition to this proposal.
11. Legal Assistance - there were two different
recommended with this proposal. One would allow the Cityagto
address personnel and civil service matters and would cost $29,000
to employ an attorney for these issues. The second issue dealt
with the preparation of the new zoning ordinance, A $20,000
a
ate -~!3
City of Denton City Council Minutes
June 29, 1993
Page 8
package was included to hire outside counsel with expertise in the
zoning field.
Council Member Cott requested that staff check to see if any local
attorney could be hired instead of going outside of the city.
Harrell continued with the alternatives which included (1) fund the
packages for outside legal assistance which would allow for legal
assistance requiring personnel civil service and zoning issues, or
(2) eliminate the packages for legal assistance which would allow
$48,000 to be reallocated but would make it difficult to implement
the new zoning ordinance and would delay the resolution of
personnel issues.
Council Member Brock asked if Council would see the proposed zoning
ordinance before adoption of the budget.
City Manager Harrell felt that it would be held until the budget
was finalized. If Council decided not proceed with the projects,
the money could be used for other reasons.
Major Issues - Utilities
City Manager Harrell inlicated that the City Charter specified that
the utility budget would be submitted to Council as recommended by
the Public Utilities Board without amendment by staff. The
proposed utility operations budget allocated total revenues of
$96,634,000 and expenditures of $95,594,000. The revenues were
based on a 3.23 increase in electric rates, a 4% increase in water
rates and a 13% increase in wastewater rates. Solid waste rates
were proposed at a $.50 per month residential increase and an 8%
commercial rate increase with a $.50 per cubic yard landfill
disposal increase. An average customer's utility bill would
increase by $5.69 pe: month or by a 4.63% increase overall.
The Electric Summary, Water Summary and Wastewater Summary
indicated no new positions with some decreases in positions. The
Sanitation Summary included many recommendations which spoke to a
recycling effort. A new program effective with the new budget year
would be to ban yard waste from normal collection activities and
pick up yard waste on Wednesdays as a special collection. This
would go to the wastewater treatment plant to be ground up and be
available as fertilizer. In addition, it was recommended to
eliminate the curbside recycling when the special Wednesday pickup
was implemented. Seven new positions were suggested including a
Recycling Coordinator who was the current Community Improvement
Coordinator and who would no longer be available for neighborhood
work.
e
3
f
Agenda No 6M - Get
gen~a~ter~ ;1.~ ..Z!-
City of Denton City Council Minutes
June 29, 1993
Page 9
Council Member Cott indicated that recycling had long term
financial and social implications. He suggested a projection of a
longer period of time than one year. This might be needed to
reorganize the Councills thinking if the City were going to lose
money over a number of years.
City Manager Harrell stated that when the utility budget was
presented it would include those issues, This budget indicated
that initial feeling, pending the results of the comprehensive
study, was that it was not profitable to go with curbside
recycling. A more probable long range solution was some type of
material recovery. This budget advocated some incremental steps
which could be done without having a full scale program and without
having curbside recycling to help with recycling. It provided for
a recycling coordinator, a ban of yard waste from the landfill, the
start of recycling of cardboard and plastics, established two
additional recycling sites, and provided for waste oil collection.
Council Member Cott stated that the problem was not the unit cost
but was the lack of a selling price for those items. He was
willing to take the loss as the social aspects were more important.
If over time, at least 5 years, the community would loose "x"
number of dollars, he wanted to know if the community would be
willing to accept that loss.
Council Member Miller asked if the tax rate included debt service
and did it assume the purchase of the computer packages for fire,
police and library.
City Manager Harrell replied yes that it would be part of the first
year of the CIP program and would be incorporated into the debt
service portion of the levy.
Council Member Cott stated that the City had had a flat revenue for
the past several years. Council must keep that in mind and not
project a large leap in revenue in future years. He also felt that
the Council needed to remember that it was not operating in a
vacuum and federal taxes, school taxes, etc, needed to be
considered. The Council needed to begin to make more start up
choices. There were new projects which would take cash for a long
time and not give cash. In the utility business, there was a
situation which needed to be discussed regarding the fact that the
City only produced 354 of what was used and had to buy the rest.
There were four partners in TMPA and a situation similar to
Bryan/College Station where by 10-124 or more percent of the units
sold were sold to state agencies, It was projected to put $60
million into that department and it was time to determine where
that was going. It was his personal belief that it required a lot
Agenda Flo q.~ • -
Agc,.nCal~ern„ ;~S ~.2.
Cate
City of Denton City Council Minutes / r-
June 29, 1993
Page 10
more than normal presentations on the issue and he would like to
hear from the Public Utilities Board on how to address issue.
There was a great need to upgrade equipment but not a great
prospect for demand of the product.
3. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
City Manager Harrell did not have any items for the Council.
4. New Business
There were no items of New Business suggested by Council for future
agendas.
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:08 p.m.
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
JENNIFER WALTERS
CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ACCO012A
i
agendaNo..
AgendaIteq_Po
Date S''-3 93
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
July 6, 1993
The Council convened into the Work Session at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil
Defense Room.
PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Smith; Council Members
Brock, Chew, Cott, Perry, and Miller.
ABSENT: None
1. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss the
following:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art.
6252-17 V.A.T.S.
The Executive session was not held during the Work Session.
2. The council received a report and held a discussion regarding
proposed changes to the boards/commissions ordinance and gave staff
direction.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that Council had asked that
this item be placed on a Work Session agenda for discussion
regarding current requirements for board /commission members and
possible changes to those requirements. A preliminary discussion
had indicated that council did not want to make any changes but as
two members were not present for the last discussion, wanted full
Council to consider the item.
Mike Bucek, Assistant City Attorney, stated that there were some
practices which the City had been doing for a number of years which
might not be enforceable due to a State law which would supersede
Denton's practice or a federal court interpretation which would
make enforcement difficult. An example would be the enforcement of
not being delinquent in taxes. While the City had a rule of not
being delinquent, there were other court decisions which seemed to
imply that those requirements might not be constitutional. The
conflict of interest section was also a difficult section as not
many cities had a charter provision which discussed conflict of
interest separate from the state statute,
Council Member Chew asked about removing the portion of Section 2-
61 relating to delinquent taxes. If it could not be enforced, why
have it in the provision.
Bucek replied that if the Texas Supreme Court had ruled directly on
a Texas case, it would be decided to take it out.
~o
Agenda No 9.~ d
AgendaltertL_...~s _
[ate- 3-93
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Jul
Y G~
Page 2
Mayor Castleberry asked if the section would apply as it had not
been challenged yet.
Bucek replied that it was not illegal to have the provision but it
might not stand if it were challenged.
Council Member Miller asked if there had been a case ruling
regarding an elected official where it had been determined that a
similar provision was not enforceable. The City's Charter had a
provision in which an elected official could not be in arrears of
payments to the City and that had been declared non-enforceable.
Bucek indicated that he understood Council would like to change
section 2-61 which would eliminate that Section.
Council Member Miller asked about term limitations for
board/commission members. Was it in the ordinance or the Charter.
Bucek replied that it was in the ordinance.
Council Member Miller stated that Council had decided at previous
meetings, that terra limitations would be followed.
Council Member Chew replied the term "generally" had been used.
Council Member Miller asked when the "general practice" would not
be followed.
Council Member Chew replied that it would be determined by the
circumstances and the board involved. He did not want to
unilaterally indicate that after three terms, an individual could
no longer serve.
Council Member Miller stated that if the "general practice" were
followed, those Council Members with a nomination in which the
member had served three terms had a very difficult situation
because a case could be made for an indispensable person on every
board.
Council Member Chew stated that there were some specific charter
requirements for some boards such as the Electrical Code Board and
the Plumbing and Mechanical Code Board. That type of situation
could cause a problem in filling positions on those boards.
Mayor Pro Tem Smith stated that she believed in term limitations
and felt it was important to have a large number of citizens serve
on City boards.
sgerdaNo.__ l.3 or
nate
City of Denton City Council Minutes 6 S
July 6, 1993
Page 3
Mayor Castleberry stated that new applications had been received
for the Electrical Code Board at the recent seminar and he would
not be against term limitations.
Council member Perry felt it would be important to leave some room
to maneuver and that the exception would be applied only if it were
in the strict interest of the city to do so.
Council Member Brock stated that she would have appreciated a term
rule for guidance this year as one of her nominations had lobbied
very hard to remain after his three terms served. If there were
three term limits for Council she could justify term limits for
boards/commission members.
Consensus of the Council was to change the ordinance language to
limit terms to three consecutive full terms with Council Members
Perry and Chew in opposition.
3. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding
the O'Neil Ford ceremony of July 30 and 31, 1993 and gave staff
direction.
Mike Cochran, Chair of Planning committee, stated there would be an
exhibit on July 3o at the Visual Arts Center honoring O'Neil Ford.
A ceremony would be held on July 31 at 10:00 a.m. with an
historical. marker placed in the Courtyard of City Hall. Following
that ther3 would be a symposium on the works of Ford in the Council
Chambers. A tour of Ford structures would be available during the
day and a reception would be held for the participants of the
ceremony. A suggestion had been made to have plaques installed on
the buildings noting that they were Ford buildings and a permanent
monument sign on the buildings to indicate that the city buildings
were designed by Ford. The Ford firm would design and donate the
signs for the City. Grants had been received to help with the
funding of the project and for the markers,
4. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding
the selection of the Diversion Task Force members and gave staff
direction.
Harlan Jefferson, Director of Treasury operations, stated that the
Council had approved a Diversion Task Forte which identified the
members of the Task Force. There were four options which the
Council could consider for member selection; (1) the Council would
recommend, select and approve all members of the Task Force, (2)
staff would recommend members willing to participate and Council
would approve those recommendations, (3) staff would contact the
various agencies identified in the resolution and ask them to
f
VpdaNo
City of Denton City Council Minutes / 9 I W1S
July 6, 1993
Page 4
submit names for Council approval such as PTA, DISD, Denton County
Probation etc, and (4) Council would recommend names for the at-
large seats and the individuals for civic groups and community
organizations which would be 5 of the 19 members, staff would
contact the agencies named requesting names for the Task Force and
the City Manager would recommend names for the four city
departments names in resolution. Staff was recommending option 4.
If the Council desired, staff could be back in August with names
for council approval.
Mayor Castleberry asked if the suggested list was satisfactory with
other members.
Council Member Cott suggested having more than one representatife
from the student body as it would affect them the most. Perhaps
four representatives from that population and reduce tho
representation from other areas. Representatives could be from the
student body of Ryan High, West High, Strickland and Calhoun.
Consensus of the Council was to proceed with option four and to
increase the student body representation to four members.
The Council convened into the Regular Meeting at 7:00 p.m. in the
Council Chambers of City Hall.
PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Smith; Council Members
Brock, Chew, Cott, Perry, and Miller.
ASSENT: None
1. Pledge of Allegiance
The Council and members of the audience recited the Pledge of
Allegiance.
2. The Council considered approval of the minutes of the Regular
Meeting of May 181 1993, the Special Call meeting of May 25, 1993
and the Regular Meeting of June 1, 1993.
Smith motioned, Cott seconded to approve the minutes as presented.
On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye",
Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion
carried unanimously.
3. Citizen Report
A. The Council received a citizen report from Gene Lewis
Agenda No
City of Denton City Council Minutes'. 3
July 6, 1993
Page 5 J
regarding the smoking ordinance in view of recent EPA findings.
Mr. Lewis stated that Kroger had recently redesigned the store on
University and the designated smoking area was right in the
* Class A carcinogen. Council shopping area. New EPA reports indicated that secondary smoke was
ordinance for po sible revisions. needed Cigarettes caused a largesnumber
of problems in society and should be curtailed. The present
ordinance was not working in some areas such as laundromats. He
felt it was worth looking at some revisions to the current
ordinance. He had a handout for council indicating more
information on the EPA report.
Mayor Castleberry stated that Mr. Lewis would receive a call from
staff after Council had a chance to look at the material presented
to them by Mr. Lewis.
S. The Council received a citizen rLl,ort from Willie
Hudspeth regarding staff notification to him on a zoning issue and
the Council's negative reaction to development in southeast Denton.
Mr. Hudspeth stated that he had a concern regarding the process he
had had with the building of his new home. He felt that there was
an unwritten law or attitude regarding the citizens in southeast
Denton. An example was that several organizations had reported
that the street area on Prairie Street near the cement plant was
being polluted. He had checked on the area before coming to
Council and the runoff was still occurring. .she main streets in
that area not ing taken care of In ir.
There was awcreek areaebehi d where he was ar,oingeto buildihisphome
and there were dead animals and trash in that creek. He had worked
hard with City staff and was frustrated thst his agenda item on the
last Council agenda had been postponed and he had not received
notification before he came to the me%tin
notified about the Juneteenth celebration and only oneh Council
Member and the Mayor attended the event. He asked Council if
southeast Denton mattered to them.
Council Member Cott stated that Hudspeth had indicated four
problems to Council (1) refuse in roads and streams, (2) non-
attendance at the Juneteenth celebration,
building his home and (4) did southeast Denton)mat erftoc Council•
On the first problem, Council received a weekly report for
assistance from citizens and he requested Hudspeth report those
items to staff to be included in the next report. Regarding the
second problem of the Juneteenth celebration, he had been notified
that Council would be receiving specifics regarding events for the
day and they had not received that information. He requested more
~ordahlo 9 -
A~c~ daftam JS
Nce -3 LZ~
City of Denton City Council Minutes / S
July 6, 1993
Page 6
details regarding the problems involved with building his home.
Regarding the fourth problem, southeast Denton meant as much to the
Council as the rest of the community.
Hudspeth replied that the area was made up of all races and the
common factor there was that they were low income residents in that
area.
Council Member Cott replied that the Martin Luther King, Jr.
Recreation Center, the COPS program, and a new school had been
initiated in the area. He did not understand what Hudspeth was
saying that the area was not important and asked him to give
specific areas to be addressed.
I
Council Member Brock stated that she had a prior engagement and
could not attend the Juneteenth events. She expressed concern about
being judged for attending or not attending only one date. She had
attended more events than just that one for the residents of that
area.
Council Member Miller stated that there was an implication that
Council's not attending the events showed a lack of interest in the
community. He and his family attended some of the events last
year. This year he did not attend as he was in Houston as a member
of the State Board of Directors for the Job Training Partnership
Act. The purpose of this Act was to provide summer employment and
training for the disadvantaged. He felt that attending or not
attending an event did not demonstrate interest in that community.
Hudspeth indicated that the Juneteenth celebration was very
important. Congressman Sarpolis had driven to Denton from Austin
to participate in the activities. He was the first elected
official othor than Council Member Chew and Mayor Castleberry to
come to Juneteenth.
Council Member Perry indicated that last night spent he had spent
2 1/2 hours visiting all the parks in the City including those in
southeast Denton as he had done a number of times. The spirit
Hudspeth was after and the concern for that part of the community
was there. He had made those visits regularly to the parka.
Mayor Pro Ten Smith stated that to correct the record, she helped
judge the parade at Juneteenth and was on the Council at the time.
Hudspeth asked Council Member Perry if he got out of his vehicle
and talked to any of the people when he was touring the parks.
q~.nr,~allam-~ ` 'ofZ
City of Denton City Council Minutes
July 6, 1993
Page 7
Council Member Chew replied yes and that he was with Council Member
Perry. They went to all of the parks and checked various areas of
the parks. This was the fourth or fifth time they had done this.
All of the Council except for Council Member Cott who was new had
attended one Juneteenth or another during the past years. He knew
that a utility crew had worked in the area of the cement plant and
was constantly addressing the problem. He wanted to know where the
dead animals were so that that problem could be corrected.
3.1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance abandoning and
vacating that certain street right-of-way easement on approximately
0.185 acres of land lying in the C. Poullalier Survey, Abstract
Number 1006, City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, and being part
of a tract of land from Robert A. Nichols, et al to Alan Goldfield,
et ux, recorded in Volume 2908, Page 534 of the Real Property
Records of Denton County, Texas; and reserving a utility easement
therein.
Frank Robbins, Executive Director of Planning, stated that this
item and the next were related. The next item was consideration of
the detailed plan to change the zoning from agricultural to planned
development. The Planning and Zoning commission had reviewed and
along with staff recommended approval of the abandonment. If the
Council had questions or issues regarding the zoning or
abandonment, the Council might want to discuss those now. If the
Council wanted to hear the zoning case first, they might want to
wait until public hearing for the zoning case was over.
Counci L Member Chew suo festal deferring this item until the Council
heard the zoning case.
Mayor Pro lam Smith asked where the gate was going to be placed.
Robbins replied that once the abandonment and zoning had taken
place, the gate would be build across the street. The area would
no longer be a City street, it would be a private cul-de-sac.
I
Mayor Pro Tem Smith stated that it would not be straight away to
the cul-de-sac. It would meet the fences in the area.
Robbins replied correct.
Consensus of the Council was to delay consideration of this item
until after the public hearing was held for the next item.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
July 6, 1993
Page 8
4. Public Hearings
A. The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption
of an ordinance providing for a change from Agricultural (A) to
Planned Development
Designation (PD) Zoning District classification and Use
on for 6.427 acres of land located west of the
intersection of Pennsylvania Drive and Southmont Drive, Usand
immediately south of St. Markus Catholic Church. 2-93-016 (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-1.)
Frank Robins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that this was
a zoning change from the agricultural district to planned
development and approval of the detailed plan. The detailed plan
was what was currently built and there would be no more development
than wl:at was currently there. There might be some expansion of
the house to the southwest. The request was for the building of a
private cul-de-sac. The Planning and Zoning Commission had three
conditions for the proposal (1) the right-of-way had to be
abandoned by the Council, (2) there be. an ideminification to the
gatCity
and ding the passage of public a,:;vice vehicles through the
(3) the gate had to meet zertain standards. Staff
reviewed the security gate specifications and had already approved
the design of the gate.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Bill Coleman, representing the petitioners, stated that this was
the culmination of two years of work dealing with the building of
a residence. There was a gato in the original plans and they
wished to replace that gate as there was not an adequate way to
all of
protect property with a public cul-de-sac. They had complied with blic comments andhance the neighborhood and benefit eall proposal.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
The following ordinance was considered;
I
I
di No City of Denton
July 6, 1993 ~ City Council Minutes alb `4
Page 9 f
N0. 93-119
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A
CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURAL (A) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD)
ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 6,827
ARCRIVES OF LAND LOCATED WEST OF THE ItJTERSECTION OF PENNSYLVANIA
DE AND SOUTHMONT DRIVE, AND IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF ST. MARX'S
CATHOLIC CHURCH, PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT
OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF, AND
EFFECTIVE DATE. PROVIDING FOR AN
Brock mottaned ~
vote, Brock "afeperry seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll Cott "aye", Pe ~y uayerio and rMayore'Ca Smith flayello Chew
unanimous)
carried
The Council returned to Item 3.1.
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 93-118
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ABANDONING AND
VACATING THAT CERTAIN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT ON
APPROXIMATELY 0.185 ACRES OF LAND LYING IN THE C. POULLALIER
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 1006, CITY OF DENTON, DENTON COUNTY
TEXAS, AND BEING PART OF A TRACT OF LAND FROM ROBERT
NICHOLS, ET AL TO ALAN GOLDFIELD, ET UX, RECORDED ,
2908, PAGE 534 OF THE REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTY,
TEXAS, RESERVING A UTILITY EASEMENT THEREIN• IN VOLUME
EFFECTIVE DATE. , AND DECLARING AN
Perry motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll
vaye', Perk ",aye",, Cott, „aye,), Miller "aye", Smith "aye+~, Chew
y aye t', and Mayor Castleberry "aye,,, Mot
unanimously ion carried
B. The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption
of an ordinance rezoning the land in Planned Development No, 19
from a mixed use development to the following:
- Si a 1~1b lSF-16}
t
162 as led
he northwest corner o- Teasley•andeLillianaMiller
and 136 acres located across Lillian Miller on the
east side, both north and south of the
Teasley/Lillian Miller intersection
- 4.7 acres located
aendaNo
u~naa ~Iern~~5_~',Z
City of Denton City Council Minutes
July 6, 1993
Page 10 D
on the east side of Lillian Miller, both north and
south of the "T" intersection with Teasley. Z-93-
010 (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval 6-0.)
Council Member Cott left the meeting with a potential conflict of
interest.
Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that this
was a case with three different districts involved. From the
Planned Development No. 19, 16.2 acres would be SF-160 136 acres
from PD to SF16 and 4.7 acres to office with conditions. The
Consent Agenda had a preliminary plat for the first phase of
development which was the SF16 district. The platting process had
started and the staff report reflected a number of issues for
dealing with infrastructure. There would be 35' setbacks for all
of the property abutting Teasley Lane which was a condition of the
zoning. if Council had a problem with the zoning the item from the
Consent Agenda would need to be pulled as it would not be in
waaccsoardance with
largetdownzoning. •ieTheopropertypwas approved
zoned area.
1984
for mixed use development and Council approved a plan in 1986.
With the proposed zoning, there would be a decrease of 13,543
intensity trips from what was currently allocated. The proposed
zoning was 3,868 intensity trips below the standard for the area.
There were some previous agreements between private parties with
respect to the wall between the property on the east side of
Teasley and Sundown Ranch to the south. In 1986, the Council
susubggested that
walthe l be detail
th at the when
fo A detailed plapnment
was not
being considered at this meeting but rather conditioned office and
SF-16 zoning. Since 1990, the wall had been an issue and council
had directed staff to work with potential landowners with some type
of City initiated zoning case. In January 1991, the detailed plan
was amended which %;as a strip center with an approved detailed
plan.
give more e etailse other sbuffe buffering t issues in the ioffice
district included a Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation
that there be a bufferyard on the northern and western boundaries
where the SF16 district was proposed. If property were used for
residential purpose a fence would be required if development
occurred next to residential areas.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Robert Reeves, representing Nations Bank which owned the property,
stated that they supported the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommendations. PD16 came before Council approximately two years
k•
agenda No `qj_-_G?P
2
Agandaltem g.S 414
City of Denton City Council Minutes '/~5
July 6, 1993 ~P '
Page 11
ago in a joint cooperative effort with the City of Denton for a
land exchange in order for the City to build a fire station and
library. There was a question of a wall several years ago since
the corner piece of property was in PD19 and was now in PD 16, He
wanted to make sure they were not obligated to build a wall across
the street. He requested that they not be encumbered with that
obligation.
R. Von Beougher, engineer and surveyor on the project, stated that
he would answer any questions the Council might have regarding the
proposal.
Bill Esponiosa asked about the office area proposed. His concern
was that there was an area which was not mentioned. That area
appeared to be for multi-purpose use,
Robbins stated that the :coning request for straight SF-16. The
bottom lot was quite large and wuuld probably be a church which was
allowed in the SF-16 district as was a school.
Espinosa stated that the entire area was SF16.
Robbins replied correct.
Donna Greeling stated that the term "probably or maybe" bothered
her in regards to the building of a church. Her husband spoke to
a surveyor that day and heard that a convenience store would be
built there.
Robbins replied that there was nothing in the district which would
allow for a convenience store in the proposal, only homes or
offices could be built in the area. A church might be interested
in the area which would be allowed,
Council Member Miller asked if the large lot would be zoned SF16.
Robbins replied correct and since a neighborhood meeting, the
petitioner had done eliminated the neighborhood service proposal,
The Mayor closed the public hearing,
Council Member Chew asked where and when the wall would be erected.
Robbins stated that the condition in the office district stated
that a wall would be built at the time the property was developed.
On a lot in which an office would be built, a bufferyard would be
built within that district along the boundaries. If the property
to the south were used for residential purposes then the landscape
I
a9rntlaltsm .~S
City of Denton City Council Minutes Late
July 1993
Page 12
ordinance would require that when that property was built, a 61
fence would be built in the area.
Council member Miller asked if the bufferyard met the standards for
MXD. If residences were to th,, south, it would be only the area
the adjacent entire to SF1the6office which would require the landscaping and no:
Robbins
. there ordinancesortan MXDa whi h wouldsrequire SF16inext to agricultural
or SF16 next to a training racetrack to build a buffer.
Council Member Brock stated that in Robbins' presentation regarding
the original discussions of the wall, he had indicated that the
discussions had e
discussion regardinga wall on the entire southern boundary was not
was not
relevant to this case.
Robbins replied that it was not part of the conditions.
Council Member Brock stated that it was a part of a planned
development which was no longer viable.
Robbins replied correct.
Mayor Pro Tem Smith asked Robbins to restate what could be in the
southern most section of the proposal.
Robbins read the list of uses for SF16.
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 93-120
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, REPEALING PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT {PD} NO. 19 ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE 84-109, BY
REZONING 4.706 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
LILLIAN MILLER PARKWAY, NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION
WITH TEASLEY LANE, TO OFFICE (0-c) ZONING DISTRICT WITH
CONDITIONS; AND RE20NING 16.205 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF TEASLEY LANE AND LILLIAN MILLER PARKWAY AND 135.986
ACRES ON THE EAST SIDE OF LILLIAN MILLER PARKWAY, NORTH AND
SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH TEASLEY LANE TO SINGLE FAMILY
(SF-16); PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF
$2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
i
COW'S Cwi f loom mo DNNloo
C xIp"
~ a l NNII M , Nal D. E vo* r N . N1 .a 0 .#~r
x kw)
eo V ...G wATe
N 82' E 143,08' l s sr,
71,5 ' X11 ; 11,53'
EXISTING
G~p 1 ~ 16'x2 ~ ~ ,Mg~aenr~♦
...M U.EI .r~ ...I
BLDG Al. W. i
00
DoT 19 6 OCK 35 1
' LOT 20
zaQ►F, 1>
-1 9 ~h
z b ~ ~ 9 61 6
N ; 7~ONE SF-10 1 ~ a
0,459 ACRE
o
K
71.530 Y
S 88 40'29' 143,06' b1
_i
i•
~ ti o2 napA,2K SA v,'JGS ASSOC,A
4QQN i voL., 2+gs PG. 323
Z u
° oTvvnn MQOQWAH SURVEY Am7
~N
r =
s - ~ -
_ -
+11,1 ~I~ti r' a M + 1J, 4"1 , i
r J^. s
0
00
YPT,AT
~~;'A ~ f+rr ; 1~l~ II l~ Nq,. 'MlMMl1 " r' ~ ~
l~Art{I~rl~t'YI~S~i" It'~1~N», IT 'Mp t S r~~ I' r
0 ys'11 pl' l.~~~l,~Ilh ~tt t ll Cl~'41
04 CIO
r
r: jl J
f
4 Ib h1~.1) l,r' fJ',
d Nor" s"
1! r Iris 'qy f` jY,P r~Yt,; r~ r
i
V~ ~r
Y
VICINITY MAP
No* SCALE 1' 2000'
i
J
1
1 ~
r 1 a
f
~r
Ii
!
T ~
r
Li f
Mill
oWM10 CRitY'IFxCAYR A11D n4ICATION
I 110190 1180 the undersign«d'Notefy roblip i:n, A64 f
$TAT$ OF TRX49 pereooallyAppeared 041.00former and 0u41e A, Fa'ri
COUNTY OF DXNTONs WRIMlls We, Hal D, Farmer nd wife, Julie h, Farmer air persons whose a a are ubaoKibad
ro the t+
the owners of that certain lot, tract or parce~ Of land 91tuated in the John acknowledged to' No that they
ssocated the as
McGowan Survey Abstract Number 7970 in the city and County of 06nton, Texas, considerations therein ogpressid and in tl,-e
o4paoii
being all of Lots 20 and 21, Block 35, of southridge $mat Phase I, an
I (50' R.OA) Q4# . -SSEWOOD " --DRWE._.. 488,22' TO R 01 OFrfOR thin shp addition to the City
of Denton, Denton County, Texas, according to the plat (IMN uMbalk my "No A*
thereof recorded in Cabinet D, Page 318, Plat Records of Denton County;
TO Texasl taken together with certificate of cos ection tiled August 1, 1986,
ETTE recorded in Volume 1944, Page 6761 Real Pro ertyy Records, Denton County,
19 LAFAYETTE N 88 40012" E 143,46' DRIVE Texas, and being more particularly described a~ followso
WANY PUBLIC
. rMrr ~.Yrr~r
BNGINNI~NG at an iron rod found for corner i the south line of Oatewood STATS OF TUAS
U.E. Drive, a public roadway having a right-of-way ~f 504 feet, said point being ,~y commission ex
ires the da
30' D the northwest corner -of said Lot 20; p y of -
THENCE N 88'10112" a, pass at 71,53 feet the northwest corner of said Lot CRRTIFICATR Olt APPROVAL
M 21, a total distance of 14346 feet with sal south line of said Oatewood
Drive to are iron rod found for corner, said po nt being the northeast corner Approved this dm
y of .
LOT 19 BLOCK 35 LOT 22 of said Lot 211 ,c c ~
LOT 20R W
f THENCE S 01" ,19'48" E, 139,81 feet with comno line of said Lot 21 and Got A,D,
19..,._._... ri
22, Block .35 of said Addition to an iron rod found for corner, said H0int B the City of The Citnte i
r 0,459; ACRE o. being the southeast corner of said Lot 211 By y y of De
n► Texas
i~
. THBUCB S 88' 40129" W, pass at 71,53 feet the southwest corn,*r of said Lotr
N 10
.....ii........................ 21, a total distsnce of 143,06 feet with the south line of said Lots
21 and aye {r
; .err rr~~. 20 to an iron rod found for corner, said pointibeing the southwest corner
of,
said Lot 201
S 88 40'29' W 143,06.
THENCE N 01'19'48" W, 139,80 feet with the a:mmon line of said Lot 20 and AM'RS'!Eb
N~ wo.2nrGA~2k, sAv~N~~S gs~cx~AT~o►J Lot 19, Block 35 of said Addition to the PIA Of dR4INNINO
and containing V~
0,459 acre of land,
41 ' Vol,. 2155~ PG. 323 a.
NOW, THBIRNFORR, KNOW ALL MEN BY TN8$8 PRRSB S that we, Hal Do Farmer and ClEy SicCetery
wife, Julie A. Farmer do hereby adopt this pl t designating the hore nabove
JOHN McGOWAN SURVEY Am*797 7g7 tract as LOT 20R, BLOCV 35, SOOTHRIOGURMT P ASB I, BEING A RRPLAT
OF LOTS 20 AND 21, BLOCK 35, SOMRIDOB EAST PHASE I, an addition to the City Of
Denton, Denton County, Texas, and do hereby d dicate to the City of Denton
for public use forever the streets and ea ements for the purpose and
4 consideration expressed hereon,
tT
Nil D, Farmer
f
l~
Julie A, Farmer RECE
r.
' j-.
F ~
JUL Q 2 X33
p~M'iMiNl
e. . .
I&VIL
O • ~ t r fpf ~ ► UTNT AT D T
~ ~j Y r I PLAT
i
0
i;11 r~
r L
~
r i
t
I
i
E
VICINIPTY CAP ■
y
SCALE 1~ 2000' 1 J
es ss _
1 ii 1• V.
1'~ l
I
l ~
i n-.
t j
Il
Y'
,.rr
a
e
F
i
~ge~da No Ld -e~-c
Agrrda;lom ks 'r.?
City of Denton City Council minutes /
July 6, 1993
Page 13
Brock motioned, Smith seconded to adopt the ordinance. on roll
vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry
"aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously.
Council Member Cott returned to the meeting.
C. The Council held a public hearing to consider the final
replat of the eastern half of Lot 7 and all of Lot 8, Block 3,
Wattam Addition= into Lot 8R. The .758 acre tract was located at
the northwest corner of Collins and Welch Streets. (The Planning
and zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0.)
Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that this
was the final step before a building permit for the property. The
property was zoned planned development which was approved by
Council in 1993. The public hearing was required as State law
indicated that if property were zoned or deed restricted for one or
two units per lot or less in the last five years, there had to be
a public hearing. This was for the Sigma chi fraternity which was
in accordance with the Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Jay Minton stated that he was in favor of the proposal. He was
available for questions if needed.
Jack Vaughn stated that he was in opposition to the proposal. He
shared a common property line with the proposal. This was a single
family neighborhood with some changes over the years and he felt
that the single family integrity of the neighborhood should be
maintained if possible. There was a significant amount c-f traffic
and congestion in the area and the construction of the meeting hall
would only increase the trash and noise in the area. This would
not be an addition to a single family neighborhood and felt that
there had to be a better place for this in the city rather than in
a single family neighborhood.
Council Member Cott asked if it were stated that there would be
control of trash and noise and stated control of parking, would Mr.
Vaughn have a problem with the proposal.
Vaughn stated that he would still be against the proposal and
wanted to preserve the single family neighborhood. This was a
neighborhood which was in transition but was still a single family
neighborhood. He was not convinced this organization would mako a
suitable neighbor.
ACendaNo.__~' -
J!
1
A 8 endallom_~~._...~_
i
~ I
9
City of Denton City Council Minutes
July 6, 1993
Page 14
Council Member Cott stated that if there was too much traffic, it
could be controlled as could too much trash and noise. This was
not a dorm, only a meeting hall.
Vaughn stated at a meeting could take place at any hour and asked
if the hours of a meeting could be controlled.
Robbins replied that he did not have all the restrictions with him
but that there were restrictions on hours of operation. Zoning had
already been approved and Council was really only looking at where
the lot lines would be. The use was already approved.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Cott motioned, Chew seconded to approve the final replat. on roll
vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew
Olaye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried
unanimously.
D. The Council held a public hearing to consider the
preliminary and final replats of Lot 4, Block A of the Minter
Addition, plus approximately 3.36 acres of unplatted land? into Lot
4R, Block A. The 3.589 acre site was located on the northern
terminus of Newton Street, approximately 450 feet north of its
intersection with Wilson Street. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommended approval 6-0.)
Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that the
DISD had withdrawn its opposition to plat consideration and Council
could continue with the public hearing if it desired to do so. A
deed restriction in the zoning required a public hearing.
Council Member Miller stated that the zoning had been approved and
Council was considering the plat.
Robbins replied that there was no zoning consideration. Only the
development. There was a lot created in two separate districts.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Willie Hudspeth stated that he hai been trying to gat his home
started since May with much frustration in trying to do this
procedure. He and his family had been saving for this house for 22
years. The location was one where there was a jail, a dog pound,
and only recent:y A school. He hoped that officials would take
notice of those who were trying to put back in to the area. He had
learned through the process that an individual needed to learn how
the system worked. He would ask the EPA for information on what
A
ApndaNo
Agi; idaIIaM-ICs Q
Cate
City of Denton City Council Minutes
July 6, 1993
Page 15
was in the creek behind this site.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Chew motioned, Perry seconded to approve the preliminary and final
replat. on roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye",
Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye".
Motion carried unanimously.
5. Public Requests
A. The Council considered a request for a noise exemption
for the Pro Youth Rodeo Association at the North Texas State
Fairgrounds on Saturday July 10, until 12 midnight.
Catherine Tuck, Administrative Assistant, stated that this was a
request from the Sanger Chamber of Commerce for a noise exemption.
There had been discussions with the Fair Association and the
neighborhood regarding the noise problem. The North Texas Fair
would have modifications to the rodeo area sound system in time for
the Fair.
H. V. Goss was against the exemption to the noise ordinance.
Approval had been given to the Fair Asso.-±:-tion on several
occasions for exemptions to the noise ordinance, it this was going
to continue, then why have the Fair go through this.
Rev. Brent Anderson stated that the church was not opposed to the
Youth Rodeo as this was what the Fairground was for. He was
concerned about the midnight time frame. He asked Council why
there needed to be a noise ordinance if Council was always going to
grant exemptions. Great progress had been Lade with the Fair
Association regarding neighborhood problems. He was concerned with
midnight exemptions. He asked Council limit the exemptions they
granted.
Gene Truss stated that the Neighborhood Assooiation would like to
stay on the record to being opposed to noise exemptions at the
Fairgrounds. Constructive conversations had occurred between the
neighborhood and the Fair Association and had identified ways to
reduce nuisance factors with events at the Fairgrounds. They were
all working on ways to hold events at the Fairgrounds without
causing nuisances to the neighborhood.
i
+genOaNo ~
cute
City of Denton City Council Minutes
July 6, 1993
Page 16
Council Member Cott asked Truss for a suggestion of times for the
two events. What were the main problems - the tJme, noise, or
traffic.
Truss replied that noise was the main problem. The neighborhood
was striving to be cooperative with the Fair and they needed their
cooperation to make sure nuisances did not happen. For example,
the Fair could use the east side of the facility for park'.ng and
the west side for events which would put them away fro," the
residences.
Council Member Perry felt that it was not unreasonable to ask the
event to stay closer to the limits of the noise ordinance.
Midnight might be the closing hour but there would still be noise
in the area for at least another hour. He suggested moving the
time to 10:30 p.m. so that the area would be cleared in a
reasonable time frame.
Perry motioned, Cott seconded that the extension be granted until
10:30 p.m. in order to keep the request closer to the limits of the
ordinance.
Mayor Castleberry stated that Sanger had requested this site with
an altarnate site in Saginaw and would be a family affair.
Council Member Miller asked if the event had been held here before.
Tuck replied yes.
Council Member Miller asked for the reason for the 12t00 p.m.
request.
Tuck replied that she did not know and that no one was at the
meeting from the Sanger Chamber of Commerce.
Council Member Miller felt that there was not enough information on
the issue. The noise ordinance was written with provisions for
variances. There was a Fairground in the community and that had to
be dealt with. It was a county fairground and Sanger was in Denton
County. He questioned if the exemption were approved to 10:30
p.m., would it defeat the purpose to having the rodeo in Denton.
Council Member Cott stated that a vote would be a direct indication
that there needed to be a conclusion on the issue. It was time for
the families in the area and for the Fair Association to reach a
conclusion on the issue.
4
A
,gendaNo.__411-Z-o
Ag9rtlaIIa
City of Denton city council minutes
July 6, 1993 d
Page 17
Truss replied that there were some events held in the rodeo arena
which the neighbors did not even know were going on. Last weekend
there was an event without a variance and a prior event did not use
the public address systems He anticipated working well with the
Fair Association regarding the neighborhood problems. Perhaps the
Fair could use smaller equipment for events.
Tuck stated that the noise ordinance dealt with disturbing persons
of ordinary sensibilities paz%icularly between the hours of 10
p.m.- 7 a.m. and anytime on Sunday. An exemption would be
necessary only during the hours mentioned. Generally scheduling
was the time factor for the rodeo in order to continue with the
loudspeaker.
Mayor Castleberry felt that a variance until 10r30 p.m. was not
significant.
On roll vote of the motion to grant an exemption until 10130 p.m.,
Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "nay", Smith "aye", Chew "eye",
Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "nay". Motion carried with a 5-
2 vote.
B. The Council considered a request for a noise exemption
for the North Texas Auto Fair at the North Texas State Fairgrounds
on Sunday, July 18, from 12 noon to 6100 p.m.
Catherine Tuck, Administrative Assistant, stated that this request
was for a noise variance request for the Sunday restrictions.
Council Member Perry asked if the event would require a large
loudspeaker system.
Tuck replied that there would be a band with loudspeakers in
addition to the auto event.
Council Member Perry asked if this would disturb church services.
Tuck stated that Mr. Everitt indicated that they would not want to
interfere with church services.
Mayor Castleberry indicated that Bryan Everitt had completed a
Speaker Card but did not wish to address the Council. His card
indicated that amplifiers would be used only for certain areas of
the fairgrounds.
Perry motioned, Chew seconded to grant the exemption.
M
A6endaNo
AD-ndal~om _~2.~
City of Denton City Council Minutes tktfe_ - ~3
July 6, 1993
Page 18
Council Member Cott asked if all events at the Fairground came
through the Fair Association.
Tuck felt that there would have to be some type of agreement to use
the grounds. The Fair Association was requesting individuals to
contact the City for an exemption.
Council Member Cott suggested that the neighborhood and Fair
Association update rules together as it related to the City
ordinance.
On roll vote to grant tee exempti+on, "aye", "aye's, Cott, "aye",
Miller "a e" " ay Chew aye , Perry "aye", and Mayor
Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously.
C. The Council considered a resolution temporarily clw.ng
Crosstimber Street between Mill and Wye Streets and Wye Strost
Between Crosstimber and Mill Streets on Friday, July 16, 1993,
Catherine Tuck, Administrative Assistant, stated that this was a
request closing streets for the Fred Moore/Fred Douglas School
Reunion.
The following resolution was consideredi
NO. R93-041
A RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY CLOSING CROSSTIMBER STREET BETWEEN
MILL AND WYE STREETS AND WYE STREET BETWEEN CROSSTIMBER AND
MILL STREETS ON FRIDAY, JULY 16, 19931 AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE,
Chew motioned, Smith seconded to approve the resolution. On roil
vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew
unanimouslyY ~,aye~+' and Mayor Castleberry +'aye". Motion carried
council Member Cott left the meeting with a potential conflict of
interest.
61 Consent Agenda , Brock P
presented erry mo itoned
on roll vot seconded to approve the+ Consent Agenda as
Chew "aye", perry "aye", and Mayor Cast Castleberry e"8ye", Mo ion,
carried unanimously.
P
Agend,3
City of Denton City Council Minutes
JUly 6, 1993 31,65
Page 19
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
1. Bid 01513 - Softball & Soccer Complex Hydromulch
2. Change Order - P.O. 0132209 - Clifford Fogus
B. Plats
1. Preliminary plat of Lots 1 through 21, Block A, and
Lot 11 Block B, Hunter's Ridge Addition. The
16.205 acre tract was located at the northwest
corner of Lillian Miller Parkway and Teasley Lane.
(the Planning and zoning Commission recommended
approval 6-0.)
C. Tax Refunds
1. Jackie R. Norris, M.D. - $1,206.78
Council Member Cott returned to the meeting.
7. Ordinances
A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for
public works or improvements. (6.A.1. - Bid 01513)
The following ordinance was consideredi
NO. 93-121
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE
AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS= PROVIDING
FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR= AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
Perry motioned, Smith seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll.
vote, Brock "&yell, Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew
"ays", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried
unanimously.
B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
authorizing the execution of a change order to a contract between
the City of Denton and Clifford Fegus; and providing for an
increase in the contract price. (6.A.2. - Change Order P.O. 023309)
n
A~eoda Na,____~-G
Agri rda
Cats - -
City of Denton City Council Minutes
July 6, 1993
Page 20 C
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 93-122
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CHANGE ORDER TO A
CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND CLIFFORD FOGUS;
PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE CONTRACT PRICEI AND PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Smith motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll
vote, Brock "aye's, Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew
"aye", Perry 'laye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried
unanimously.
The Council considared establishing fees to be paid Inrelation ptooan application dfornor
renewal of a loading zone. (Tile Citizens Traffic Safety Support
Commission recommended approval.)
Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that Council had approved
the loading zone ordinance at its June t, 1993 meeting. There were
blanks in the ordinance for the cost of the zones. At its June 15
meeting, Council had approved fees, however, the ordinance passed
on a 3-2 vote, There was a discussion regarding four votes to
approve an ordinance and the City Attorney's office indicated that
four affirmative votes would be needed. The June 15 meeting was
not binding.
The following ordinance was consideredr
i
N0, 93-123
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING FEES TO BE PAID IN RELATION TO AN
APPLICATION FOR OR RENEWAL OF A LOADING ZONE] AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Perry motioned, ^hew seconded to adopt the ordinance,
Council Member Cott asked if this ordinance had to be approve at
all, Could the Council go back to general loading zones with no
parking.
Mayor Castleberry indicated that the motion and second was to adopt
the ordinance as written.
Council Member Miller stated that if the council voted against the
ordinance there would be no charge for the loading zones. The
ordinance was only dealing with the fees for the loading zone.
Date Q - 93
City of Denton City Council minutes 261, 6 ~5
July 6, 1993
Page 21
There was an ordinance in place fov the loading zones. If Council
did not approve this ordinance, there would be loading zones but no
fees.
On roll vote, Brock "nay", Cott "nay", Miller "aye", Smith "aye",
Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion
carried with a 5-2 vote.
8. Resolutions
A. The Council considered approving a resolution
establishing and creating a special citizens advisory committee to
provide recommendations regarding a possible additional sales tax
to reduce the property tax.
Catherine Tuck, Administrative Assistant, stated that. Council had
considered this item at its planning session. Council desired to
create a citizens committee to provide for the study of a possible
sales tax amendment. There were several blanks in resolution for
the number of individuals on the committee and the number each
Council Member would nominate. There was also a blank when th,
committee would bring its report back to the Council which was
important for when the Council might want to hold the election.
Dates for the election would the third Saturday in January, the
first Saturday in May, the second Saturday in August, the first
Tuesday after the first Monday in November.
Mayor Pro Tom Smith asked Tuck to review the time frame to
implement the tax.
Tuck replied that the date was always October lot. Any election
date would be appropriate. She also mentioned that the resolution
indicated that the committee would engage an expert in the
financial field to review the economic impact on various groups in
the community.
The following resolution was considered:
NO. R93-042
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AND CREATING A SPECIAL CITIZENS
ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING A
POSSIBLE ADDITIONAL BALES TAX TO REDUCE THE PROPERTY TAXI AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
4gwj
A6c rCattort
City of Denton
July 6 city Council Min+ !t3~o `~'i,3 ` ~J3
, 1993 rtes
Page 22 i
Brock motioned,
rock Smith to
nay it Co ntd "a Miller s ityenreSmith on.
Perry ua e„ ' a e a
e„On hroll ew it vote,
unanimously, Mayor Castleberry nayen, y Chew aye"
Motion carried Castleber thMayor
Council ant to app for
entire Council appoint two nmembersf committee members. Would
a chair, per Council Member plus the
Consensus of the Council was to have lg
council member and the Council would appoint ppoint a chair. from each
Mayor Castleberry asked for a possible election date,
Mayor Fro Tem Smith felt that the November date would be too soon
and suggested either January or May,
City Manager Harrell stated that a
could be separate from the
election
w Council elects n Son' would if save this election
coulostd s which other wisce would have to be date assum put a
election. T distane between the Council d, The Januar
a good montFyically results in a Januaro election andy this
hold a sales tax electinwere not good and was not
Mayor Castleberry stated that if
the
ion effective date of the sales tax would belOctoberw1, in May, the
City Manager Harrell rep lie have an effective date fiOctoobere1, that an
r 1994, any election date would
Council Member Cott recommended a January election.
Council Member Perry felt January would
Council Member Miller felt that not be a good month,
would be too great a rush ood month. It
January
May mi
{
to do the eiectton
y was not good time either, In November and
Council Member Brock felt that this Issue might become a major
Issue of a election campaign, There were many other issues
at durinj an election campaign, She was concerned that
skew the election, to look
it
Council Member Chew a might
greed with Council Member Brock.
~QB~1d3N0 _ U~ - J
Agcntlaifam, ~S^~`,Z
City of Denton city council minutes l~atB 93
July 6, 1993
Page 23
Brock
Chew motioned, Cott seconded for a January election. On roll vote, Cott Perry "aye's, and "nay1ft Smith
with ae5-, Chew 2 vote.
Mayor Castleberry stated that time was needed for the committee to
report to Council and suggested October 15, 1993.
Cott motioned, Chew seconded that the committee report to Council
on October 15, 1993, that the committee be composed of 15
Individuals two each presented by Council and the Chair appointed
by the entire Council and that the election be held January 16,
1994•, On roll Vote, Brock "aye"I Cott, "aye", Miller "aye"$ Smith "a" Chew Motion carried"aye
unanimously, aye ' and Mayor Castleberry "aye".
Mayor Pro Tom Smith asked when the Council would present names for
approval.
Mayor Castleberry suggested that the Committee be appointed August
15, 1993.
City Manager Harrell suggested that the members be nominated the
first meeting in August.
96 The Council received nominations for the City's Boards and
commissions.
The Council nominated individuals to the City's Boards and
commission as indicated in Attachment A.
10. The Council received an update on the Vision for Denton-21st
Century Project. (Council Members Brock and Miller)
Council Member Brock presented minutes of the June 23rd meeting of
the project cabinet which indicated some of their considerations of
projects and schedules. On July 19-20 Joe U ndford would be
speaking to the project cabinet regarding the viaaioriin
project.
pro
Several committees were already in progress. One was to
place for a vision room, the publicity committee s to locate a
and there was a committee to work up data bahad started work
well k fo vo as
a for as a community outreach subcommittee which was lworking on
ideas to get the community involved. They were also working on a
speaker's bureau and groups to address. There would be an
information packet for speakers so that all speakers vould have the
same information plus a folder for volunteer information.
Venda No
Agti'tde'tom
City of Denton City Council Minutes 1c.5
July 6, 1993 G
page 24
Council Member Miller stated that the kick-off date had been
tentatively set for Sunday, October 24, 1993 at 1:30 p.m. This
would involve 3-3 1/2 hours in order to discuss the process and the
future of Denton.
11. Staff Direction
Council provided staff direction on the following item:
A. Major Budget Issues Report
Ken Gold presented information to Council regarding budget
information. This information addressed the inequity in civil
service raises as compared to other city employees as well as the
difference in TMRS pensions. Staffing at the fire stations was a
continuing problem.
City Manager Harrell stated that he had three items for Council:
(1) Under separate cover, information had been given to Council
which addressed Council's questions from the previous meeting.
(2) Recommendation from the Human Services Committee. The
Committee had given Council recommendations with priorities and
asked if council were going to reduce the amount funded, that they
be given a chance to reprioritize the agenciea for allocation.
Last year, after the major budget issues had been presented, the
n
they ew amount of money was sent back to Human Services Committee and
reallocated
the money. If Council
proposed the
could comfortable
that felt
be r taken wto tthe
he
Committee. If the Council were not comfortable, a determination
could be made later in the process. Staff had recommended an
allocation which would approximate an increase that other
departments were receiving.
Council Member Chew suggested waiting until they were further into
the budget before making these types of decisions.
Mayor Castleberry stated that he was uncomfortable proceeding at
this time.
Council Member Cott asked if there was something that needed to be
done now.
City Manager Harrell stated that he was trying to follow the
Council's past practices. At some point, prior to the time the
Council formally adopted budget, the Committee had requested an
opportunity to reprioritize the allocations to the various agencies
F
City of Denton City Council Minutes
July 6, 1993
Page 25
rather than the Council doing that. There was time needed to do
that process.
Consensus of the Council was to delay consideration until further
in the budget process.
(3) Recommendation regarding ambulance service
suggested increasing the fee now rather than wait until endHofrthe
budget process. He asked if there was Council support to prepare
an ordinance to put the fee increase in effect.
Council Member chew felt that it would be difficult to increase
fees to Denton citizens until after an increase hai
to smaller cities. been made o
The City was subsidizing too much for
the smaller cities.
City Manager Harrell stated that if the fee were raised, it would
be raised for everyone. Denton citizens and small cities alike.
Council Member Chet; felt that there was a lot of subsidizing and
there was a reed to make it more equitable between the citizens and
the contract cities.
Mayor Castleberry asked Council Member Chew if he were suggesting
that the outside fees be greater than in the City.
Council Member Chew replied correct.
City Manager Harrell stated that it was recognized that that was
the case and that was the reason for starting dialogues with all of
the smaller cities and as well as lobbying the County to continue
their subsidy to the City.
Mayor Castleberry asked for the actual cost for a run.
City Manager Harrell stated that the current charge was $120. The
actual cost was over $300 per run which was a conservative estimate
for the cost of a run.
Council Member Perry asked if runs out of the city were charged
less than $120.
City Manager Harrell stated that all runs were $120. The amount
received in fees plus the County subsidy did not cover the cost for
running the ambulance service. The gap between the amount collected
and the County subsidy was subsidized either by the smaller cities
of the general city tax payer to balance the budget.
a
Agenda No,
Agc dailem__
City of Denton City Council Minutes
July 6, 1993
Page 26
Mayor Castleberry suggested that staff bring calculations and the
Council could then decide on a possible increase before the final
budget process.
Council Member Chew asked for figures to make the fees equitable
for all,
City Manager Harrell stated that Deputy City Manager Svehla and
Fire Chief Cook were going to meet with the small cities to discuss
the problem and possibly determine a way to make the process more
equitable. It might take a couple of year program to get to an
equitable ground a3 the other cities would be in the budget process
also.
12. Miscellaneous matters from the city Manager.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manger, presented the following items:
A. The staff h
Councilts direction. A public arequests section hadn been format for
input from citizens plus a "Staff Directic," item which would
involve major items needing council direction.
13. There was no Executive Session held during the work session.
14. New Business
The following items of New Business were suggested by Council
Members for future agendas:
Council Member Chew e
reconsiderationof the Bartonville ArgyleETJ issue. On roll voter
Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye$',
Perry "aye", anO Mayor Castleberry I'aye". Motion carried
unanimously.
B. Council Member MiJler suggested reviewing the city
smoking ordinance,
15. There was no Executivc Session held during the Regular
session.
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:35 p.m,
Agc•~dallam ~S
V-5
City of Denton City council minutes
July b, 1993
Page 27
Bob Castleberry, Mayor
City of Denton, Texas
Jennifer Walters
City Secretary
City of Denton, Texas
ACCO012F
ATTACHMENT A
agenda No
Agendaltam _i~=~S ~`o?
BOARD/COMMISSION NOMINATIONS ale 3
1993-94
AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL
1 Terry Garland Terry Garland 1993-95 Chew
2 George Gilkeson George Gilkeson 1993-95 Smith
6 Rick Woolfolk William (Mike) Stephens 1993-95 Brock
ANIMAL SHELTER ADVISORY BOARD
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL
7 Bettye Johnson 1993-95 Mayor
1 Nonie Kull Nonie Kull 1993-95 Chew
3 Steve Meyerdirk Steve Meyerdirk 1993-95 Perry
4 VACANT 1991-94 Cott
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
SEAT' CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL
6 VACANT Rachel Mays 1993-95 Brock
7 Bill Colville Bill Colville 1993-95 Mayor
1 E. Ray Griffin L. A. Wilkerson 1993-95 Chew
3 Rebecca Blair Rebecca Blair 1993-95 Perry
4 Rebecca King Rebecca King 1993-95 Cott
BUILDING CODE BOARD
BM CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL
1 Ed Owens Ed Owens 1993-95 Chew
2 Cliff Reding Nicholas Eassa 1993-95 Smith
49endaNo q8- .1,2~
Apidalam--Li Late _ 2-2 - 93
CABLE TV ADVISORY BOARD
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL
5 Joe Holland Ed Bell 1993-96 Miller
2 Richard Rodean Richard Rodean 1993-96 Smith
CITIZENS TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPORT COMMISSIOM
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCI
3 Carolyn Bacon Carolyn Bacon 1993-95 Perry
4 Doug Chadwick Kathleen Singleton 1993-95 Cott
5 Betty Duncan Betty Duncan 1993-95 Miller
7 Alice Gore Alice Gore 1993-95 Mayor
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM CO CI
1 Peggy Norton Peggy Norton 1993-95 Chew
2 Sarah Parker Lisa Polack 1993-95 Smith
4 Dennis Stephens James McDade 1993-95 Cott
6 Jack Weir Jack Weir 1993-95 Brock
DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION T~BNI COUNCIL
7 Don Edwards Don Edwards 1993-95 Mayor
1 Jim Kuykendail Eugene (Gene) Luster 1993-95 Chew
Agenda No
Aac datlam
1IN ADV R rtn
o rao Bo life I'- - 3
i
5
SEAT CU_RRE_Nj MEMBER ~J
5 NOMIAON C/
TERM
6 COUNCIL
Dean Cochran Robert (Kent) Baxter
Don Davis Don Davis 1993-95 Miller
7 Kathleen Gigl 1993-95 Brock
Teri Rheault
1 George Highfill
2 Pat will 1993-95 Mayor
Don 1993-95
Hill Chew
is Sill Don Hill 1993-95
Thomas Bill Thomas smith
1993-95 Chew
ELECTRICAL CODE BOARD
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER
V-0-MINA TI~~
2 TERM C-~
Stuart Cawthon Stuart Cawthon
5 Terry Schertz 1993-95 Smith
6 Trenton L. Williams Terry Schertz
1993-95 Miller
Trenton L. Williams
7 Fred G. Reed 1993-95 Brock
Fred G, Reed
1993-95 Mayor
EIBTORIC L ttnuae CO I88rON
NOMINA pt( TERM CO__ UN,C12
2 Judith Abbott
4 Judith Abbott
W• A. Barker 1993-95 Smith
5 Sullitt Lowry
L12 Bays 1993-95 Cott
6 Elinor Caldwell Suzanne Byron
1993-95 Miller
1 Rita Holcomb Mark Merki 1993-95
Rita Holcomb Brock
3 George SPuller 1993-95 Chew
Alan Smart 1993-95
Perry
HUMAN SERVICE8 COMMITTEE
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL
4 Al Barstis Wesley H. Stewart 1993-95 Cott
5 Catherine Bell Catherine Bell 1993-95 Miller
1 Dorothy Damico Ed Smith 1993-95 Chew
3 Linda Holloway Linda Holloway 1993-95 Perry
5a Carol Riddlesperger Carol Riddlesperger 1993-95 Miller
6 Gary Truitt Victor DeSantis 1993-95 Brock
7 VACANT Mary Morimoto 1993-95 Mayor
ZEEF DENTON BEAUTIFUL BOARD
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM CQ-U-N CIL
2 John Cooper Judy Smith 1993-9P Smith
3 Dick Engle Dick Engle 1993-95 Perry
4 John Enlow John Enlow 1993-95 Cott
5 Sherrie Etheredge Jean Ross 1993-95 Miller
1 Jeans Morrison Don Hayes 1993-95 Chew
2a Martha Len Nelson Martha Len Nelson 1993-95 Smith
LIBRARY BOARQ
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL
5 Dorothy Adkins Linnie McAdams 1993-95 Miller
6 Jean Greenlaw Jean Greenlaw 1993-95 Brock
1 Dorothy Minter Dorothy Minter 1993-95 Chew
2 Mary Jo Pickens Alex Finlay 1993-95 Smith
Agead3NO, ~z'-D ~
Apt ~
PARK! AND RECRRATI01i HOARD ~f 7 JJ lO`~
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINA'T'ION TERM CO NCIL
5 Dalton Gregory Doug Chadwick 1993-95 Miller
b Burkley Harkless Burkley Harkless 1993-95 Brock
1 Neta Stallings Neta Stallings 1993-95 Chew
PLANNING i+ND ZONING COMMISSION
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERN COUNCIL
4 Richard Cooper 1993-95 Cott
7 Ivan Glasscock 1993-95 Mayor
1 Mary Evelyn Huey Mary Evelyn Huey 1993-95 Chew
2 Melvin Willis 1993-95 Smith
I
PLUMING AND MECHANICAL CODE BOARD
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TZRM COUNCIL
3 George Becker 1993-95 Perry
4 Bill Burley 1993-95 Cott
7 Ted Lewellen Ted Lewellen 1993-95 Mayor
2 Bob Sullivan Dave Reynolds 1993-95 Smith
PUBLIC UTILITIDO BOARD
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM OC UNCIL
7 John Thompson John Thompson 1993-97 Mayor
ApendaNo
AgeedaItam ,)e,~
Date
SIGN BOARD OF APPEALS 6 5
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL
2 Gene Gumfory Gene Gumfory 1993-95 Smith
4 Frank Massey Cliff Reding 1993-95 Cott
5 Tony Soto Tony Soto 1993-95 Miller
6 Jim Tucker Dena Fairfield 1993-95 Brock
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM
Frank Davila Frank Davila 1993-96 Harrell
DENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY
SEAT OURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM
7 George Hubbard George Hubbard 1993-95 Mayor
7a Warren Whitson Warren Whitson 1993-95 Mayor
7b William Wilson 1993-95 Mayor
I
TXPA BOARD OF RIRECTORS
E1~ CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM
Ray Stephens 1993-95 Council
AC000128
z
}
]J
Y
49~rda No -0:6 e. SP
ApBRQgifertL
CITY OF DENTON
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ~S
The July 13, 1993
Council convened
Civil Defense Room. into a Special Call Session at 5:15
pm. in the
PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Smith.
Brock, Chew, Cott, Perry, and Miller,' Council Members
ABSENT: None
1, The Council received a report, held
staff direction regarding the releasr_ a
Bartonville, discussion and gave
of ETJ area to Argyle and
Mayor Castleberry indicated t
persons present who that there were several
of the Council was thad requested to interested
speak to Council. Consensus the individuals to'
Harry Persuad, Senior Planner
the issue on June 15 o stated than Idication that council
at when Council discussed
might not want to release propert, The there was
of Highway 407 and the area surrounding thearea pro perty perty Gated south was l
adjacent to the City of Argyle or to the Cito
was some area which was Open was
either.
in the city which allowed the Bartonville. There pro Into Bart nvi le. Larry rry Leesley had requp area be
Council looked ested h 1' to remain
considered the fact that at this annexed
it issue 1990, it
Certificate of Convenience and is ar was notinthe C
provide water service
yls
Necesd le to
ensit of unless the CCN wereachanoeda not be able to
itself
dyto residences and in the long term future Wouldrnotalendw
there would residential use. If the area wer be recommended approximately $20,000 worth of a in the City today the
Coun long term nterE t in kee in agreed that the Citpediy tax, Staff
Annexation Polic p g the area in thee Cit ad not have a
Plan r
releasing land included adopted by Council y s ETJ• In the
tt,j eleasing
corporate c (1) physically isolated anthe d surrounidedfby
outside of y limits of another municipalit
intend to a recognizable boundary beyond which the tand he located
foreseeable f lure municipal services and land use y did not
or more cities ' (3) if the area abutted the city in the
release of that area unlessCouncil would not usually limits of two
proper apportionment of the athe cities areo
rea and mutuall y consider the
proper ETJ should be f4) the releaseeofas ea the
interested parties and analyseseOfzal1 reltp,ant issues s withsall
Mayor Castleberry indicated that Council had received letters from
people in the area regarding the issue,
Council Member Miller asked where the Rayzor property was located.
f
t
Agenda No
Date-
City of Denton City Council Minutes Jr~ C S
July 13, 1993 ;
Page 2
Persuad indicated approximately where the property was located and
that the Rayzor property was not in the immediate area.
Ted Koren stated that he represented the 14 homes in the area. They
wished to remain in the ETJ and if they had to go with a city,
would prefer to go to Argyle.
City Manager Harrell stated that legally Denton would have the
authority to annex this property without permission of the
residents. Argyle and Bartonville could not do that without having
the consent of the property owners.
Koren replied yes that they understood that.
Council Member Miller asked why the residents preferred to stay in
an ETJ.
Koren stated that the two roads servicing the homes were dead ends.
Bartonville wanted to make those roads thoroughfares. Bartonville
had no services to offer and they did not want to pay taxes for no
services.
Council Member Miller stated if the property were in an ETJ, it
would still be in the country unless annexed. Denton could annex
the property but that was not likely. one ETJ or the other would
be the same unless the provision of the roads.
Sarah Petzinger stated that the area had only one water supply
system. It would be difficult for the residents if the property
were placed in different cities.
Pam rhauvin stated that Bartonville wanted the businesses and
wanted to give Argyle the residences.
Council member Brock stated that an earlier council and a different
Council tad agreed to release the ETJ after Argyle and Bartonville
divided the property. This was a new council and after three years
the cities had plenty of time to complete the process. She felt
that this Council was not bound to the original proposal after such
a long time.
Perry motioned, Chew seconded to retain the property in Denton's
ETJ.
Council Member Miller ntated that this property fit into the policy
guide adopted by Council. Whether the property was in Denton's ETJ
or not, it would still have same set'ing.
i
6
t
Y
1
AgendaP,o.__ 'G2
Agvn a!ternxte ?
City of Denton City Council Minutes mar/
July 13, 1993
Page 3
Council Member Cott felt that it was not good for Denton to release
this property at this time.
Council Member Miller asked if negotiations would continue. Did
the motion mean that dialog would stop.
Council Member Chew indicated that the motion would keep the
property in Denton's ETJ and there would no longer be any dialog.
Consensus of the Council was that that was correct.
on roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "nay", Smith "aye",
Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion with
a 6-1 vote.
2. The Council received a report, held a discussion and gave
staff direction regarding the implementation of the 1993-1997 CIP
Program.
City Manager Harrell stated that this discussion had started at the
Council's planning session. Council had asked that this item be
placed on a Work Session before final decisions were made. During
the Planning Session it was decided to have staff proceed with the
proposals for the library computer system and the police/fire
system and to implement those as other computer systems had been
implemented by issuing certificates of obligations. That decision
of the certificates of obligations for the computers brought to the
forefront a decision about the upcoming CIP of the City. The funds
for the CIP projects were used and without some kind of action in
the near future, there would be a halt to CIP projects and the City
could not go forward with the 1993-94 projects. Council wante,,
some background from the 1986 bond election and wanted staff to be
sure that no projects were dropped with an alternative plan.
Besides the computer projects proposed in the 1993-94 CIP, there
were five other projects listed. All of those were sidewalk/street
projects and totaled $825,000 in the 1993-94 unauthorized projects.
In 1992 the City felt that it could proceed with the Fort Worth
Drive project. Originally it was felt that the project needed to
go south to 135 which the State subsequently did. The project was
then changed to go north to Collins Street and sufficient bonds
were sold to do that project. After the bonds were sold the State
agreed to participate in the project but could not do until 1996.
The sold bonds were $1.3 million. If Council was agreeable to
access the $1.3 million of already sold bonds, all of the
street/sidewalk projects listed in the 1993-94 CIP could be done.
If the sold street/sidewalk bond3 were accessed, council would
still have authority for the Fort Worth Drive project in 1996
without further voter authorization. There was still $3 million of
e
AgerdaNo. Kja, -f?J ~
City of Denton City Council Minutes ,S es
July 13, 1993
Page 4
bonds left which could be sold and accessed for the Fort Worth
Drive Project. The 1994-95 CIP had three unauthorized projects for
street reconstruction, a new roof for five general fund buildings
and upgrading the existing park system. The street reconstruction
money minus the $825,000 would still provide sufficient money for
all projects except for $150,000 scheduled for the 1994-95 CIP.
This alternative would allow such projects as Bonnie Brae, Hickory
Creek, etc. to be completed.
Council Member Perry asked for a clarification regarding being
$150,000 short.
City Manager Harrell stated that the 1994-95 CIP had a total of
$638,000 for street reconstruction for no specified streets. With
the $1.3 million of bonds already sold, all of the 1993-94 CIP
projects could be done at a cost of $825,000 plus $500,000 for
street reconstruction projects. With that money there would be the
flexibility to do some projects currently discussed. Alternatives
Included (1) keep the $1.3 million worth of bonds in reserve until
the fort Worth Drive project was started in 1996 and access those
funds to build that project. If Council chose this alternative,
the City would either have to immediately set up a new CIP
committee for a new 5 year program or be willing to push back the
1993-94 program until the city had voter authority to issue new
bonds. (2) subject to approval from the 191 committee, utilize the
$1.3 million of sold bonds to do the 1993-94 and 1994-95 CIP
street/sidewalk programs. This would postpone for a year the
necessity to go tack to the voters for a CIP election and possibly
two years. Advantages of the two alternatives included (1)
alternative one would go to voters and they would specifically
endorse the projects for the 1993/94 projects; (2) access the
already sold $1.3 million of bond money. If that money were used
it would avoid selling new debt which would save approximately
$85,000-130,000 for no new principal interest payments. Another
advantage of Alternative 2 was to accelerate street paving
projects. (3) delay having a full CIP campaign for a year which
would help economy improve and not confuse a bond election with the
sales tax issue. staff was requesting a general direction of which
alternative the Council would like to proceed.
Council Member Cott stated that the use of the bond funds was a
subject. The bonds were sold as the Manager had described and the
voter confidence and trust was important. He felt no problem at
this point recommending the project as the trust factor would be
fine.
Mayor Pro Tem Smith believed the key to trust and confidence was
that there still would be money for the Fort Worth Drive project
I
I
f
~ge~CaPro ~3 - Da2r4
RaIa rl'-
City of Denton city Council Minutes `fl its
July 13, 1993
Page 5
and the City would not have to go back to the voters for the
authority to do that project. She
proposal saw no problem with the
.
Council Member Chew indicated no problem with the proposal and that
the bottom line was that there would still be money to do the Fort
Worth Drive project.
Council Member Miller indicated that the funds were dedicated as
they were sold such as park bonds for parks, street bonds for
streets. The money stayed within the allocation of bonds sold and
addressed Major safety issues in the community.
C,.)uncil Member Perry asked if the upgrade of the existing park
t,ystem was included.
City Manager Harrell replied th-kt some of the picnic shelters in
existing parks would be included. If Council decided to go ahead.
with Alternative 2, the CIP would only be delayed for one year. if
Council wanted to put off the CIP another year, some of those park
and roof projects would be delayed.
Council Member Brock indicated that there was a serious problem in
the Willowwood area in getting children to Borman School. The road
was very narrow with large ditches and there was more traffic on
the road when parents drove their children to school due to the
unsafe conditions. This was not a recreational bikeway but a means
to solve a very difficult situation.
City Manager Harrell stated that this was a point of trust. The
191 committee had been very faithful in making sure the bond money
was spent according to the voters original wishes.
Mayor Castleberry asked if the work on Hickory Creek would affect
the extension of Loop 288.
Rick Svehia, Deputy City Manager, replied that the City's work on
Loop 288 extended the Loop down to Teasley Lane. In the future,
the city would encourage the Highway Department to continue that
development west. Any work on Hickory Creek at this time would not
have any effect on the Loop.
Council Member Brock asked to vhat extent the Highway Department
was contributing to Fort Worth Drive.
svehla replied that in the beginning the City would build and
design the road. Since that time, with ICTEA and the Federal
Highway Act, some regulations had changed, originally only the
~a!o. 3 - 93
City of Denton City Council Minutes /J
July 13, 1993
Page 6
outside lanes were considered by the state and had $1.5 million to
help with project. The City might not need the entire $1.3 for the
project due to Statefs contributions.
Smith motioned, Perry seconded to proceed with Alternative 02. On
roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye's, Miller "aye", Smith "aye",
Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion
carried unanimously.
3. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding
the appointment of a member to the Board of Managers of the Denco
Area 9-1-1 District.
Council Member Cott left meeting.
John McGrane, Executive Director of Finance, stated that the Denco
Area 9-1-1 Board of Managers had two appointees from the cities.
olive Stephens' term would expire this year. She had served on the-
Board since the beginning and indicated a willingness to serve
again if appointed. She must receive a majority of the votes from
all of the cities. If acceptable, staff would proceed with a
formal resolution for council consideration.
City Manager Harrell stated that this item would be placed on the
July 20th agenda for staff direction.
4. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding
a review of the Denton Central Appraisal District's budget.
City Manger Harrell stated that this item was for council
information and would be placed on the July 20th agenda for staff
direction.
Council Member Cott returned to the meeting.
Joe Forsythe, Denton Central Appraisal District, stated that the
proposed budget had been included in the Council back-up materials.
He asked if Counci, had any questions regarding the budget.
Couroil Member Cott stated that they did not have 1993 to date.
Forsythe replied that their budget was a calendar year but that
they were going to change to either the city or school district
calendar.
Council Membe; tvtt asked how the year was proceeding against
budget.
LM
Y
~ger,aahto._~3 - G,2~
City Denton
July 13, City Council Minutes t v~Gs
J
Page 7 1993
~
Forsythe replied that they were on track as far as the budget was
concerned.
Council Member Cott asked about the printing service which had an
increase from $37,000 to $43,000 while office supplies were going
down.
Forsythe replied that much of the printing was done outside and
those two accounts were driven by actual expenditures.
Council Member Cott stated that furniture and equipment was going
down from $340000 to $25,000 and maintenance was remaining the
same.
Forsythe stated that those were miscellaneous capital items.
Council Member Miller asked about the increase in salaries and the
decrease in retirement.
Forsythe replied that they were on a fixed rate system while the
City was on an annually determined contribution system. The Texas
County/District Retirement System had allowed them to change to an
annually determined contribution system which would save money.
John England updated the Council on the Peterbilt case.
McGraz,e stated that the Council did not need
to
affirmative action. Action would have to be taken only if the
Council had an objection with the approved budget.
5. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding
providing the Texas Department of Transportation with input from
the City of Denton on the proposed redesign of Roselawn at u.
377.
S.
Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that there had been two
public opportunities for input regarding Fort worth Drive. One of
the major concerns was how Roselawn came into Fort Worth Drive. The
Highway Department had severe right-of-way
within several feet of some of the businesses inethe a ea.w Some of
the property would have to be condemned and some of the buildings
would be very close to the roadway if state guidelines were
followed. An alternative to lessen that burden was to have the
Highway Department cul-de-sac Roselawn. There would be no street
entrance back to Denia Park and the cemetery.
done,
the design standards changed and the entrancesrbecame wa re private
driveway which required a smaller radius and lessened the right-of-
way requirements. Staff had visited with two of the major business
City of Denton city council minutes G
July 13, 1993
Page S
owners in the area and they liked the idea of the cul-de-sac. This
alternative would change the access for the homeowners on Roselawn.
They would not be able to come off Fort Worth Drive but rather
would have to go to Acme to Bernard and then to Roselawn. Access
to the cemetery would be better with the proposed route as opposed
to the current access from Fort Worth Drive. The major property
owners were in favor and the Highway Department did not have a
problem with the proposal. Staff felt this would be more positive
than negative with this alignment.
Mayor Pro Tem Smith asked how someone would go to a business in the
area. Would he go down Bernard.
Svehla replied that the residents would have to use Bernard and the
businesses would have the cul-de-sac.
Council Member Perry asked if the residents were aware of the
proposal.
Svehla replied that the three residents were renters and staff had
not been able to contact them. Staff had only spoken to the owners
of the businesses as they were most affected. Staff would continue
to try and contact the residents.
6. The Council considered nominations and appointments to the
City's Boards and Commissions.
Council nominated the individuals as noted on Attachment A.
Smith motioned, Chew seconded to approve the nominations as
indicated with the exception of the TMPA Board if Directors. On
roll vote, Brock "ayell, Cott, "aye", Miller "rye", Smith "aye",
Chew "aye11, Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion
carried unanimously.
With regard to the TMPA Board of Directors, Miller motioned, Smith
seconded to appoint Bill Giese. Perry motioned, Cott seconded to
appoint Mark Chew.
Council Member Perry felt that one of the problems with TMPA was
that it was unresponsive to the citizens of the separate cities it
served. He felt it would strengthen the Board to have an elected
representative on the Board who was knowledgeable about utilities.
This appointment would change the checks and balances to make them
be more responsive to citira and would add a dimension to that
Board.
City of Denton City Council Minutes X57
July 13, 1993 cJ
Page 9
Mayor Castleberry asked for a vote for appointing Bill Giese to the
TMPA Board of Directors. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "nay",
Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "nay", Perry "nay", and Mayor
Castleberry "aye". Motion carried with a 4-3 vote.
Mayor Castleberry asked for a vote for appointing Mark Chew to the
TMPA Board of Directors. On roll vote, Brock "nay", Cott "aye",
Miller "nay", Smith "nay", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor
Castleberry "nay". Motion did not carry with a 3-4 vote.
7. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
There were no items from the City Manager at this meeting.
8. New Business
The following items of New Business were suggested by Council
Members for future agendas:
A. Council Member Chew asked for a work session item
regarding the franchise taxes with GTE.
B. Mayor Pro Tem Smith stated that Congressman Sarpolis
would be in Denton on Sunday afternoon and Council could give his
the Council picture at 3:30 p.m. or could wait until August 12.
Consensus of the council was to wait until August 12 at 5:00 p.m.
Council Member Perry asked if the presentation could 1-e done at
6:00 p.m. instead of 5:00 p.m.
C. Council Member Brock asked for a discussion regarding
the status of the brick walkways.
City Manager Harrell stated that there might be a solution to the
problem. The bids had been opened earlier in the day with two
bidders on the project. Both bidders bid on alternate concrete
pavers, new bricks and the reuse of the old bricks supplemented
with new brick. The low bidder bid the use of old bricks, then
pavers and finally new bricks. The other low bidder had a low bid
for pavers, the old bricks and finally new bricks. It appears that
the recommendation would be to go with used brick. This item would
probably be presented to Council at the August 3rd meeting.
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:05 p.m.
x
abie -,1 - 3
City of Denton City Council Minutes
July 13, 1993
Page 10
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
JENNIFER WALTERS
CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON
ACC00132
}
y
%TTACELN!EST A
qnd,, No
(a,R7 d
BOARD/COMMISSION NOMINATIONS 49C p Ga
.3 - 93
1993-94 ~Yf@
d'r7 ~ w
►AUPORT ADVISORY BOARD
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION
0 C I
1 Terry Garland Terry Garland 1993-95 Chew
2 George Gilkeson George Gilkeson 1993-95 Smith
6 Rick Woolfolk William (Mike) Stephens 1993-95 Brock
ANIMAL SHELTER ApV190RY BOARD
SEAT CURRENT MEMBE NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL
7 Bettye Johnson Mike Alexander 1993-95 Mayor
1 Nonie Kull Nonie Kull 1993-95 Chew
3 Steve Meyerdirk Steve Meyerdirk 1993-95 Perry
4 VACANT 1991-94 Cott
BOARD OY ADJUSTMENT
T CURRENT M mBER NOMINATIQ~
T~~1 COUNCIL
6 VACANT Rachel Mdys 1993-95 Brock
7 Bill Colville Bill Colville 1993-95 Mayor
1 E. Ray Griffin L. A. Wilkerson 1993-95 Chew
3 Rebecca Blair Rebecca Blair 1993-95 Perry
4 Rebecca King Rebecca King 1993-95 Cott
BUILDING CODE BOARD
SEAT CURRENT M.MM NOMINATION
TERM COUNCIL
1 Ed Owens Ed Owens 1993-95 Chew
2 Cliff Reding Nicholas Eassa 1993-95 Smith
Agend", No
AgeaJ:liem S-?-
BOARD/COMMISSION NOMINATIONS G d /J G 6
1993-94
AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNC
1 Terry Garland Terry Garland 1993-95 Chew
2 George Gilkeson George Gilkeson 1993-95 Smith
6 Rick Woolfolk William (Mike) Stephens 1993-95 Brock
ANIMAL SHELTER ADVISORY BOARD
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM CM CI
7 Bettye Johnson Mike Alexander 1993-95 Mayor
1 Nonie Kull Nonie Kull 1993-95 Chew
3 Steve Meyerdirk Steve Meyerdirk 1993-95 Perry
4 VACANT _ 1991-94 Cott
BOARD OF ADJUSTNEHT
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINAT Off{ TERM COUNCIL
6 VACANT Rachel Mays 1993-95 Brock
7 Bill Colville Bill Colville 1993-95 Mayor
1 E. Ray Griffin L. A. Wilkerson 1993-95 Chew
3 Rebecca Blair Rebecca Blair 1993-95 Perry
4 Rebecca King Rebecca King 1993-95 Cott
BUILDING CODE BOARD
rS T CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION I m COUNCIL
1 Ed Owens Ed Owens 1993-95 Chew
2 Cliff Reding Nicholas Eassa 1993-95 Smith
~en~+aPlo. <~3-OAS'
A~~r,~~Itam _ z
CABLE TV ADVISORY BOARD
C> c~j~
~E&j CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL
5 Joe Holland Ed Bell 1993-96 Miller
2 Richard Rodean Richard Rodean 1993-96 Smith
CITIZENS T ,pplC BAPET,g SUPPORT CQU198I0N
SEAT CURRENT MEMEER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL
3 Carolyn Bacon Carolyn Bacon 1993-95 Perry
4 Doug Chadwick Kathleen Singleton 1993-95 Cott
5 Betty Duncan Betty Duncan 1993-95 Miller
7 Alice Gore Alice Gore 1993-95 Mayor
CONlIUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMtiITTZ
SiFiBT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCI
1 Peggy Norton Peggy Norton 1993-95 Chevr
2 Sarah Parker Lisa Polack 1993-95 Smith
4 Dennis Stephens James McDade 1993-95 Cott
6 Jack Weir Jack Weir 1993-95 Brock
DATA PROCFSSINa ADVI80RY BOARD
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION Tim COUNCIL
7 Don Edwards Don Edwards 1993-95 Mayor
1 Jim Kuykendall Eugene (Gene) Luster 1993-95 Chew
A .
y
r,
i
g~;. ~S z
A d.ilaam ~
CABLE TV ADVISORY SO D
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCI
5 Joe Holland Ed Bell 1993-96 Miller
2 Richard Rodean Richard Rodean 1993-96 Smith
CITI3ENB TRAFFIC BAVETY SUPPORT COMMISSION
C
SEAT CU RENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUN
3 Carolyn Bacon Carolyn Bacon 1993-95 Perry
4 Doug Chadwick Kathleen singleton 1993-95 Cott
5 Betty Duncan Betty Duncan 1993-95 Miller
7 Alice Gore Alice Gore 1993-95 Mayor
COxKUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
SEAT gURRENT MEMBER NQMINATION IFM COUNCIL
1 Peggy Norton Peggy Norton 1993-95 Chew
2 Sarah Parker Lisa Polack 1993-95 Smith
4 Dennis Stephens James McDade 1993-95 Cott
6 Jack Weir Jack Weir 1993-95 Brock
DAT PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD
SEAT OMLU MEMBER NO Its' NATION TERM COUNCI~
7 Don Edwards Don Edwards 1993-95 Mayor
1 Jim Kuykendall Eugene (Gene) Luster 1993-95 Chew
i
F
i
DONNTOWN ADVISORY 80 nn 2 L
SEAT CURRENT iEIM NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL
5 Dean Cochran Robert (Kent) Baxter 1993-95 Miller
6 Don Davis Don Davis 1993-95 Brock
7 Kathleen Gigl Teri Rheault 1993-95 Mayor
1 George Highfill Pat Will 1993-95 Chew
2 Don Hill Don Hill 1993-95 Smith
la Bill Thomas Bill Thomas 1993-95 Chew
ELECTRICAL CODE HOARD
SEAT CURRENT MEMBE$ NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL
2 Stuart Cawthon Stuart Cawthon 1993-95 Smith
5 Terry Schertz Terry Schertz 1993-95 Miller
6 Trenton L. Williams Trenton L. Williams 1993-95 Brock
7 Fred G. Reed Fred G. Reed 1993-95 Mayor
NIBTOAIC LANDNARR COMMISSION
ffm CURRENT MEMBER LOMINATION TERM COUNCIL
2 Judith Abbott Judith Abbott 1993-95 Smith
4 W. A. Barker Bullitt Lowry 1993-95 Cott
5 Liz Bays Suzanne Byron 1993-95 Miller
6 Elinor Caldwell Mark Merki 1993-95 Brock
1 Rita Holcomb Rita Holcomb 1993-95 Chew
3 George Spuller Alan Smart 1993-95 Perry
w
Agonda No. ~ 1=
AOe~~~alfen~,~;
HUN71N BERVICFA CONNITTlp ~.J
BEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATE
TERM COUNCIL
4 Al Baratis Wesley H. Stewart 1993-95 Cott
5 Catherine Bell Catherine Bell 1993-95 Miller
1 Dorothy Damico Ed Smith 1993-95 Chew
3 Linda Holloway Linda lolloway 1993-95 Perry
5a Carol Riddlesperger Carol Riddlesperger 1993-95 Miller
6 Gary Truitt Victor DeSantis 1993-95 Brock
7 VACANT Mary Morimoto 1)93-95 Mayor
IEEP DENTON BEAUTIFUL BOARD
~"FiBT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION IM COUNCIL
2 John Cooper Judy Smith 1993-95 Smith
3 Dick Engle Dick Engle 1993-95 Perry
4 John Enlow John Enlow 1993-95 Cott
5 Sherrie Etheredge Jean Ross 1993-95 Miller
1. Jeans Morrison Don Hayes 1993-95 Chew
2a Martha Len Nelson Martha Len Nelson 1993-95 Smith
LIBRARY BOARD
ALU URREHT MEMBER NOMINATION TEEM COUNCIL
5 Dorothy Adkins Linnie McAdams 1993-95 Miller
6 Jean Greenlaw Jean Greenlaw 1993-95 Brock
1 Dorothy Minter Dorothy Minter 1993-95 Chew
2 Mary Jo Pickens Alex Finlay 1993-95 Smith
AgerdaNo
Ap,idaEten?
y _ a
rble
PARRS AND RECREATION BOARD ~
rZ CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL
5 Dalton Gregory Doug Chadwick 1993-95 Miller
6 Burkley Harkless Burkley Harkless 1993-95 Brock
1 Neta Stallings Neta Stallings 1993-95 :hew
RLMING AND SONINO C0'AH16810N
fim CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION z= CQUNCIL
4 Richard Cooper Richard Cooper 1993-95 Cott
7 Ivan Glasscock Barbara Russell 1993-95 Mayor
1 Mary Evelyn Huey Mary Evelyn Huey 1993-95 Chew
2 Melvin Willis Dick Norton 1993-95 Smith
PLUMBING AND NECNANICAL CODE BOARD
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION g~ COUNCIL
3 George Becker 1993-95 Perry
4 Bill Burley Karl Martino 1993-95 Cott
7 Ted Lewellon Ted Lewellen 1993-95 Mayor
2 Bob Sullivan Dave Reynolds 1993-95 Smith
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
fim CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION T6BM COUNCIL
7 John Thompson John Thompson 1993-97 Mayor
i
AGenJOlo
Aa:r > !to
OION BOARD OF APPEALS
am CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION COUNCIL
2 Gene Gumfory Gene Gumfory 1993-95 Smith
4 Frank Massey Cliff Reding 1993-95 Cott
5 Tony Soto Tony Soto 1993-95 Miller
6 Jim Tucker Dena Fairfield 1993-95 Brock
QUIL SERVICE COMMISSION
SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION IEBM
Frank Davila Frank Davila 1993-96 Harrell
DENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY
, T CURRENT MEMBER 2QwATION T~$PS
7 George Hubbard George Hubbard 1993-95 Mayor
7a Warren Whitson Warren Whitson 1993-95 Mayor
7b William Wilson _ 1993-95 Mayor
TNPA BOARD OF DIRECTORS
02T CURRENT MEMBER N MINATION TE$b
Ray Stephens Bill Giese 1993-95 Council
ACC00128
t
AGendaNo
Agendalt L;
CITY COUNCIL REPORT oats
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council l/
FROM, Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
DATES August 30 1993
1993
SUBJECTS Neighborhood Block Party onoSaturday, oAugust 7 Street for a
RECOMMENDATION,
To temporarily close Sherwood Street, from Mistywood Street to
Shadywood, on Saturday, August 7, from 12400 noon to 8400 p.m. for
a neighborhood block party.
SUMMARYs
David Bilas, representing the neighborhood, has requested that the
street be closed to provide adequate space and safety or those
attending the block party. The actual block party will be
from 100 p.m. to 100 P.M . 400 with setup beginning at noon and clean
up after event until 8
The property owners affected by this closure have, signed the
attached petition with the exception of the resident at 2409
Sherwood. David Bilas indicated that this resident was not opposed
to the event but did not want to sign the petition. The residents
at 2415 Sherwood indicated that shorter hours would be preferable
m to 600 P p.m. that the actual event
and David Biles'
will laut from 1s00 p
The barricades will be manned and no property owner will be denied
access since the neighbors will allow them through the barricades.
Both the Police Chief and Fire Chief have been advised of this
event and have no safety concerns with this temporary screst
closure.
Please advise if I can provide additional information.
RESPEC - LLY SUBMI TED,
to d V. Harrel
City Manager
Prepared bys
Catherine E. Tuck
Administrative Assistant
Ef\YPDOCEVIEE\SNEANOD.D Agan~a~o~~~n -
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY CLOSING SHERWOOD STREET FROM ITS INTER-
SECTION WISH MISTYWOOD STREET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH SHADYWOOD
STREET ON AUGUST 7, 19931 AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, David Biles, representing the neighborhood, is re-
questing that Sherwood Street, from its intersection with Mistywood
Street to its intersection with Shaiywood Street, a public street
within the corporate limits of tha City of Denton, Texas, be tem-
porarily closed to public vehicular traffic between the hours of
12100 noon to 8:00 p.m. on August 70 1993, for the purpose of
having a neighborhood block partyi and
WHEREAS, David Biles, representing the neighborhood, has as-
sured the City that the property owners in this area have agreed to
the temporary closing of this street, and that no property owner
will be denied access to their property; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTONs
SECTION I. That Sherwood Street, from its intersection with
Mistywood Street to its intersection with Shadywood Street, a pub-
lic street within the corporate limits of the city of Denton,
Texas, be temporarily closed to vehicular traffic from the hours of
12:00 noon to 8:00 p.m. on August 7, 1993, for the purpose of a
neighborhood block party.
SECTION II. Th,.t the city Manager shall direct the approp-
riate city department to erect barricades on Sherwood Street from
the intersection of Mistywood street to its intersection with
Shadywood Street, at 12:00 noon and to have the same removed at
8:00 p.m. on said date.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1993.
COB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BYs
AgenaNo
Cat) f~~
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY: PAGE 2
ss
. A6arQaNo,~Q,~
RILES & LOCK, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW
512 W. HICKORY, SUITE 220
DENTON, TEXAS 76201 l/
'i
TELEPHONE: (811) 566.0566 METRO: (214) 434-3832
DAVID W. BILES •t FACSIMILE: (817) 5651376
PAULA A. Loci •t
July 10, 1993
Katherine Tuck, Assistant to the City Manager
Denton Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Re. Sherwood Street Closure on Sahlyday, August 7th
Katherine:
Enclosed Is a "Request for Street Closure" which has been signed by all homeowners on
the southern block of Sherwood. The requested street closure is from noon until g p.m. nn
Saturday, August 8, 1993. The purpose for the street closure is to conduct a block party
between the hours of 1 p.m. and 6 p.m. The closure time period is to allow set up for one hour
prior to the start of the party and two hours to clean up.
Monty Borden and Jane Ruestman (husband and wife) noted that they prefer "less hours".
I have visited with them and determined that they are not opposed to the street closure and
understand the party will last fewer hours than the requested closure time, On that basis, it Is
my understanding that they have no opposition.
Please place this Street Closure Request on City Council's agenda and advise me of the
date it will be considered. 1 will be happy to appear before Council In support of the request
and will answer any questions or con erns of the members. Thank you for your assistance.
t ,
David W, Biter,
DWB:cc
cc: Lower Sherwood Neighbors
Couneilmember Margaret Smith
" BOARD CERTIFIED FAMILY LAW, TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION
t MEMBER: COLLEGE OF THE STATE BAR OF TEXAS
e
AG9~CaPJn
Arc^~: ilsmrltJ.S# ~f) _
REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE J~
Organization Requesting Street Closure: Lower Sherwood Neighbors
Contact Person: David Biles
Address: 2414 Sherwood
Phone Number: 387-3440
Street to be Closed: One Block of Sherwood, from from Mistywood to Shadywood
Date and Time to Be Closed: Noon to 8 p,m. on Saturday, August 7, 1993
Intersecting Streets: Mistywood (on south) & Shadywood (west side of north end of block)
Reason for Closure: Block Party
Name of Property Owner/ Address of Property Authorized Signature Favor)
T~e~nanntt~ / 01mose
1. CE ~O.Z SN e~w,, . ~ a rJo
2. RtG a1 l; sn. L'!o~ S~tE/ o /1 r'4✓OQ
3. t~o c /S~/-I G ~2 S~jr~wo+ct! ,bQ..«.~ ~~vc~
5. aA 20c` -S~al~d
6• ALL mt in j (FaivoAj
7. ~o h 1igrt r*~~ ~Y~J jACao•s
- c~
9.
10. _
11.
12.
13.
14. -
(Z08rMW ood
g
3
N
NOPOSE6 CLOSU 3N~2J~tD+ES
rot FAJ ~ ~LSCA Ali or b
~
ND Fr~tE. NYbPAMS ARIL LOCATIA ~a
11, CtoStjrff- 1NUEA
3ErvAS pus E7' wt~ 3rL
ALL
631 L.[ST S r r-4LOF Ssmt" Tp ~ to W
ErJSIXiC, ;r-u L L - Uhl L,* F t R1t. lM~.
•w~
CITY
NCI]
coy
ono, o,
N
~ s
d
Mr
CCGG~4'
M1~ ~
a
r,1~M~•
Agenda No..2:.g2
Agenda lte^+ r - a ZQ
CITY COUNCIL REPORT Oete_ 'Y j'9
v e, / ` ✓
TOr Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Request for an Exemption from the Noise Ordinance for
Vision Ministries August 12-14, at 1207 W. Hickory
DATE: August 3, 1993
BACKGROUND:
Steve Johnson, representing Vision Ministries, has requested that
the City Council grant an exemption to the noise ordinance on
Thursday, Friday, and Saturday (August 12-141 1993) until 12:00
midnight. The noise ordinance declares loudspeakers, amplifiers,
and musical instruments a noise nuisance particularly between the
hours of 10:00 p,m and 7:00 a.m. (please see copy of ordinance
attached). However, the ordinance states that the City Council may
make exceptions when the public interest is served.
Vision Ministries wishes to hold a benefit concert as an outreach
to the citizens that frequent the Fry Street area as well as
gathering food to be distributed to those in need. The concert is
scheduled to be held on the parking lot of the Park and Go behind
the Avenue A businesses.
City staff asked Mr. Johnson to contact the Police Department to
make security arrangements. He has talked with Lt. Paul Abbott, in
charge of special events for the Police Department. Mr. Johnson
has been asked to provide additional information regarding this
event so that Lt. Abbott can determine tle appropriate level of
security suggested for this event. Whb:p this information is
received, the Police Department will work with the event organizers
on a security plan for this event,
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS: OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Those attending the benefit concert, neighborhood residents, Fry
Street and Avenue A businesses
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
4
AB~"daNo.'~..
aga~daltem~~
Please advise if I can provide additional Information.
/
RESPECT "LY SUBMITTED
1 ~
Lloy V. Harre 1
City Manager
Prepared bys
Cow-
Catherine E. Tuck
Administrative Assistant
a
e~onC3No._. _1.? a
rate -
Ju3Y 26, 1993
July
Dear City Council Members,
On August 12-14, Vision Ministries will be sponsoring a three
day benefit concert for a food drive at 1207 west Hickory in
Denton, Texas, Canned food will be the admission to these
concerts and will feed many people who otherwise might not
get too many regular meals, vision Mintstries is a non-profit
organization that helps the needy and would appreciate your
help in this event.
Some of the bands are coping all the way from Arlington and
Irving to play for these concerts and will not be arriving
until 9:30pm because they work during the day. In particular
on Thursday, August 12, one of the bands will not be able to
start until 10:00pm and will be playing until 12:00. These
bands are of great reputation and will not be accepting money
except for gas. I as aware of the noise ordinance and curfew
at 10:00pa for Any kind of outdoor music, But in this case
these bands could inspire many young adults, who might
otherwise be getting high or listening to bands who's lyrics
aren't very constructive, to come hear some great music and
to contribute to a good cause.
You sby ask, "Why did you pick the area of Hickory and Fry
street? why not play at a more appropriate area?" Well, I'm
aware of the problems with loud bands, In that area, in the
past. But this will not be another Fry Street Fair. True,
the music will be loud and unusual, Just like the Fair. But
tbe difference is this; the city of Denton has the chance to
show the college kids that not all things are as they seem,
"I cians who dress Just like they do and listen to the same
type of music can care about positive things.
1 personally plan to go to all of the residents and
businesses in the area and inform them of our plans, and ask
that they bear with us for three days as we, in turn, will
try to keep it under control.
Please consider giving us an exemption for three days to
extend the time to 12:00, You may affect the lives of many
hungry people and many messed up kids,
Sincerely,
Steve Johnson
Agenda No Apecda~tem~,S' ~.C~
oafs
Chapter 20
N 38ANCE9•
Art. 1. In General, If 2041-20-SO
Art. 11. Abandoned Property, 20.31-20.70
Div. 1. Generally, it 20.31-2040
Div. 2. Motor Vehicles, if 20-41-20.70
Art. 113. Gran and Weeds, #120.71-60.78
TI GENE
AR CLE I. IN ItAI.
Sec. 20.1. Notre.
It shall be unlawful for person to make o cause any (a) any or se y unreasonably loud,
dis•
turbine, unnecessary noise which causes or may cause rrsterial distress, discomfort or Wury
to persons of ordinary sensibilities in the immediste vicinity thereof.
(b) It shall be unlawful for any person to make or cause any noise of ouch character,
intensity and continued duration as to substantially Interfere with the comfortable enjoyment
of private homes by persons of ordinary sensibilities.
(c) The following acts, among others, are declared to be noise nuisances In violation of this
Code, but such enumeration shall not be deemed to be exclusive:
(1) The playing of any phonograph, television, radio or any musical instrument in such
manner or with such volume, particularly between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00
a.m., as to annoy or disturb the quiet, comfort or repose of persons of ordinary sen-
sibilities in any dwelling, hotel or other type or residence;
(2) The use of any stationary loudspeaker, ampluler or musical instrument in such manner
or with such volume as to annoy or disturb persone of ordinary sonsib(lities in the
Immediate vicinity thereof, particularLy between the hours of 10:00 p.ns. sad 7:00
a.m., or the operation of such loudspeaker, amplifier or musical inttrument at any
time on Sunday; provided, however, that the city council may male amplions upon
application when the public interest will be served thereby;
(3) The blowing of any stem whistle attached to any stationary boiler or the blowing of
any other laud or htr•rsachin` steam whistle within the city limits, ""opt to give
notice of the time to be& or stop worts or as a warning of danger)
(4) The erection, suavation, dersrolitice, altoratlon or repair work on my bultdiag at any
time other than between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 8:30' p.m., Monday through
'Croce refsrenoee-ProtseW migratory bird roosts declared nuisemee, 1647; inspection
and abatement warrants, # 19.98 at seq.; insect and rodent control in mobile home and roo•
reational vehicle parks, f 324L
SuM No. 1 1389
i
4
ACeodaNo
120-1 DENTON CODE A6eedzilem S 7f
Date
Saturday, provided, however, that the city council may Issue special permits for su eu~/[iy/'
work at other hours in case of urgent necessity and in the interest of public safety and
convenience;
t5) The creation of any loud and excessive noise in connection with the loading or un-
loading of any vehicle or the opening or destruction of bales, boxes, crates or con-
tainers;
(6) The use of any drum, loudspeaker or other Instrument or device for the purpose of
attracting attention by tht creation of note" to any performance, show, theatre,
motion picture house, sale of merchandise or display which causes crowds or people to
block or congregate upon the sidewalk or streets near or adjacent thereto.
(Code 1966, 44 11.20, 14.21)
Cross reference-Animal noise, 16-26,
See. 20.2. Odors.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to create or cause any unreasonably noxious,
unpleasant or strong odor which causes material distress, discomfort or injury to persons of
ordinary mmibilities In the immediate vicinity thereof.
(b) It shall be unlawful for any person to create or cause any odor, stench or smell of such
character, strength or continued duration as to substantlaUy Interfere with the comfortable t
enjoyment of private homes by persons of ordinary sensibUlties.
(c) The following acts or conditions, among others, we declared to be odor nuisances in
violation of this Code, but such enumeration shall not be doomed to be exclusive:
(1) Offensive odors from cow lots, hog pens, fowl coops and other similar places where
animals are kept or fed which disturb the comfort and repose of persons of ordinary
sensibilities;
(2) Offensive odors from privies and other similar plae";
(3) Offensive odors from the use or possession of chemicals or from Industrial processes or
activities which dbturb the comfort and repose of persons of ordinary sensibilities;
(4) Offensive odors from smoke from the burning of trash, rubbish, rubber, chemicals or
other things or substanose;
(5) Offensive odors from stagnant pools allowed to remain on any promises or from
rotting garbage, repse, offal or dud animals on any premises.
(Code 1M, 111114-22, 11.49) '
Sec. 20.3, Oarbag% trash and rubblah nuisaocea-Clanara y.
(a) &Mrif or AMping gw*^ hush and rubbish. The storing or keeping of any and all
stacks, heaps or piles of old lumbar, refuse, ; ink, old cars or maehinery or parts thereof,
garbago, trash, rubbish, scrap material, ruins, demoUshed or partly d*moW W structures or
buildings, piles of stones, bricks or broken rocks on any premis" bordering any public street
Supp, No. 1 1390
~i
CITY
COUNCIL
~OOO ~ ` ~ 1o F~
c y
17
o a~ ~
~a~D000Gfl~~~oo
IMMM
f
r~ -
DATE: August 3, 1993
CITY COUNCIL REPORT agertdsNo..~ 28
AAendaltem
Date -Li-9j.
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Z-93-012
RECOMMENDATION:
See attached report.
SUMMARY.,
See attached report.
BACKGROUND:
See attached report.
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEDs
None.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
Respectfully submitted:
Prepared by: Llo d V. Harrell
City Manager
i
G. Owen Ypet-yprban Planner
Approved:
ra obbins AICP
Executive Director
Planning and Development
AX O0411
AcendaNo U3 Q~~
Agvdaltem,_Z&=1 .
Ito
STAFF REPORT
Tot Mayor and Members of the City Council
Case No.t Z-93-012 Meeting Dates August 3, 1993
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicants John C. Johnson
P.O. Box 1603
Denton, TX 76201
(represented by Ernest Hedgcoth,
Metroplex Engineering)
Current Owners John C. Johnson
P.O. Box 1603
Denton, TX 76201
Requested Actions Create a planned development zoning district
by approving a detailed plan, with designated
uses for duplex and single-family residences.
Location and Sizes A 1.419 acre lot at the northeast corner of
Frame and Uland Streets
Surrounding Land Use and Sonings
North - Single-family residential use in 14-F-7 zoning.
Stouth - The right-of-way of Uland Street, across from which is
primarily vacant land in SF-7 zoning, plus one
dwelling.
East - Single-family residential use in SF-7 zoning.
West - The right-of-way of Frame Street, across from which is
single-family residential use in SF-7 zoning.
Denton Development Plant
Intensity Area No. 48 - Low intensity area.
v
ApentlaNo._~'
pgeadafler S
Case No, 2-93-
0 C~
12 t9
August 3' 3
Page 2 1993 /7
SPECIAL INBORMTIOM
Transportation,
No additional paving of
However, either five ft. of additional rime or Uland Streets is re
plat, along both streets, ght-of -way will be dedicatedYeby
Concrete aideo~alks y
and Concrete
Street will be required along
Uland (formerly Fritz Street), both Frame Street
Utilities,
Water Is
Water is available to
an 8-Inch
the site' A 6-inch line is in
line is in Frame t
site as well. An 6- Sewer service is labd St, and
in Frame St, inch .line is in Uland St, available the
and a 6-inch In is
Electricity l
in is available to the site from
structures, Additional easements will be existin
Drainage, dedicated by Plat.
' There are no drainage
has been designed tc improvements required.
614 of the site will remain toward the strretahe parking area drain .
dense Bois D~arc grove at the northeast e of the lot. Approximately
/ a including a
the lot.
HIBTOAY
The site was placed in
the approved zonin a single-family (SF-7
neighborhood around it is f City in 1969. ) zoning district vie
lot dimensions also zoned SF-7 The older, established
in excess of what actually which calls
Most of the 1.419 acre site Y exist, for minimum
so for at least a century is currently undevelo ed
been acquired by the app
' one existin p and has been
single-family licant, and willhcontinue0to ame St.) has
506 Frame house, Two vacant/abandoned homes be used as a
houses, St,} are being repaired as habitable Frame
St. and
(One is now occupied,)
single-family
d
Case No. Z-93-012
August 3, 1993
Page 3 7
HISTORY, continued
Aandportionbecameknown as the "Brotherton tract"
included
with the larger tract. viac an n ftax
paid
lien. The site was publicly auctioned, as required by Texas
law, and consequently acquired by the applicant.
ANALY8I8
Intensity Area No. intensity area is a48 is ll cat d nOtIntensityltripsd' at acre. A low
60).
this site is allocated a total of 85.14 intensity tripse.(1.419ssc
The proposal itself requires an overallocation of intensity trips,
by virtue of having four single-family units (at 10 trips per unit)
and twelve d pl is uuni nits 10a x 40 trips per unit) , The total intensity trips
required trips than its normal allocation.o plus 10 x 12 120)1 75.14 more
In this case, the Denton Development Plan allows an over-allocation of int inters earsmo t logical" useeofrtheslands judged to be the "least
In light of the acceptance by the neighborhood, and an addition to
the low/moderate income housing stock, the Planning & Zoning
Commission sees the proposal as the least intense, most logical use
of the land. The proposal also complies with the sed purpose of
a Planned Developments tat
A. General Provlrie ,
lPn. The purpose of this article is to Provide for
t of Planned distric ts are intended to Provide for the do v olopmenta of land as
an Integral unit for These
plan that l vary single or mixed use in accordance with a
sowing districts, heom the established regulations of other
creative t
annino the tibili of land ic t, y are also meant to encourage flexible and
allow for the adjustments of changingpdemandstto meet theucurrent
needs of the community, and to provide for a development that is
superior to what could be accomplished in other coning districts
by meeting one or more of the following purposes$
Agenda No
Agenda tom___V~rl
Case No. Z-93-012
August 3, 1993
Page 4
ANALrsxs, continued
(a) Provides for a design of lots or building/ increased
recreation, common or open space for private or public
usel berms, greenbelts, trees, shrubs or other landscap-
ing features) parking areas, street design or access/ or
other development plans, amenities or features that
would be of special benefit to the property users or
community.
The proposal is not classified as multifamily according to the
Denton Development Plan. The Plan classifies as "multifamily" only
those uses with a density of 12 dwelling units per acre or more.
The proposal before you has a density of 11.97 units/acre.
RECONIIENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Commission, via a public hearing on
6/23/93, recommends the approval of. Z-93-012 with the condition
that duplex structures be limited to two stories in height. The
Commission felt that the proposal is the least intense, most
logical land use. The adjoining neighborhood seems to be enthusi-
astically in favor of the proposal, and it adds to low/moderate
income housing income availability.
During January and February, the applicant and Owen Yost (Urban
Planner) visited fifteen of the most impacted residents. Their
responses are summarized in Attachment 41 and their comments were
incorporated into the current proposal.
A meeting of the neighborhood was then held on March 16th of this
year, for all owners and residents in the area of Frame, Uland,
Rose and Paisley Streets. At least 58 notices were mailed, plus a
number were hand-delivered to make certain that renters were aware
of the meeting. Notification included those persons who were later
notified (as a legal requirement) of the proposal before you. The
light turnout (Attachment 5) indicated that there was no active
opposition. In fact, all those present were in favor of the
proposal.
1
Yi +v' W R
AgerdaNo
Acudaltern_
Case No. Z-93-012 7
August 3, 1993
Page 5
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition.
2. Approve petition with additional conditions.
3. Deny petition.
4. Postpone.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map.
2. Detailed plan.
3. Intensity Area No. 48.
4. List of personally contacted residents/owners and responses.
5. Sign-in sheet for neighborhood meeting.
6. P&Z Minutes.
AXX00419
a
`93.42 Johnson ATTACHMENT 1
7i
NORTH
l
, D
I ~ I
f~
aft
r
Y
Y
~ ~ _ rrtE
CIE s _
4
w r
r ~M
R
{R~ t
R w 1
Location Map
Date: 6/8193 Scale: None
lvdaN'o
nt3 ~''.~.:_2J
ATTACHMENT 2~
93.012 Johnson - NORTH
I rd rwrr I r•r srr I
ROB rrrow
I x eo•~a'os• [ I k es•:rrr• ~ I
I s •a•Ir t u~n~' ~ vs.io' i
I YUia iuwa__
/ r
r ; Ira for
I wa BLOCK A
1.415 ACRES NET I
I ( I ~ ~Y ~ "I
I I w Mp w•---.r w I
I
I ~ ; I
j M77 --0.7
I I1 .r ••r ~ I I /O
i A r I I i f
I
I • •wr Q•w '•/'r~ :ice I ~
. U L,A N S ..E. T.._............,
i
V4 two
i
Date: 6/8193 Scale: None
a~
F
ATTACHMENT 3-'3-
LAND USE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF DENTON
Intensity area 1: 48 Types Low Intensity Trips/ac 60
Traffic survey zones: 6563 6564 6565 6569
Boundary description: South: Mc Kinney St.
East: Old North Rd., Audra, Lattimore, Mulkey
Dates 01/05/92 West: TP & MKT Railroad
-------------------------------------------rr-----------------------------------
LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS
CATEGORY UNITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY ACRES UNITS INTENSIT
SF-16 < 16 11.4 160 0 0 0 0 0
SF-10>1f 221 76.13 2210 0.7 21 7 33 330
SF-7>10 503 115.18 5030 65.03 2731.26 7 38 380
LESS SF-7 141 28.93 1410 0 0 64 312 3120
MOS.MOMES 1 0.4 10 0 0 0 0 0
DUPLEX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MF-R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MF-1&2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
COM/RE's' 0 10.34 6721 7.5 4875 0 0 0
OFFICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
INDUSTRY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TIONAL 0 33.42 2840.7 0 0 0 0 0
1-, AxS 0 Q. 0 0 0 0 0 0
R/0/SPACE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TRANSPORT 0 I r" 0 0 0 0 0 0
AGRIC. 0 0 0 25.85 0 0 0 0
VACANT 0 176.9 0 0 0 0 0 0
rrrrrrwr-rrwrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrwrr-rrrrrrw-rrrrrrrrrrwrrrrwwrrrr.wrrrrrrrr
TOTAL 682 472.66 18362 99.08 7627 76 383 3830
wrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrwrrrrrrrrrrrrwrrrrrrrrrrrrwrrr+rrwrrrrrrrrrwrrrrrrrrrrr►rrrrr
INTENSITY CALCULATIONS
-----------------rr--rr
(1) Intensity area total trips 472.66 times 60 28360
(2) Trips allocated to existing land uses (built) 18382
(3) Trips allocated to current zoning inol. P Ds (not built) 11457
(4) Trips allocated to vacant lands not zoned plus Agric, zoning 1551
(5) Estimated unallocated intensity trips 1)minus(2)+(3)+(4) -3030
(6) PorcGlItage of intensity trips allocated 111
--rrrwrrrrrr-rr--rrww-rrrrrwrrrrrrr-rrrrrrrrrr-rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrwrrr
1
i
i
i
ATTACHMENT 4 2!a
NEIGHBOW COMMENTS OF PROPOSED FRAME/ULAND P.D. hG
Stanley Rose:
Address: 530 Frame St.
Comments: Looks fine, this neighborhood needs some activity.
Increased density should not be a problem.
Mary P. Allen:
Addresst 505 Frame St.
Comments: Would be good for the neighborhood. The vacant land
is no good to anyone now - it's even dangerous.
Katherine Payne & son:
Address: 411 Frame St.
Commentst Looks forward to the development. So does the son
(mid 20s, who will inherit the house). The extra density
is fine, espeofally with all that empty land across the
street.
Blanche Padgett:
Address: 412 Framo St.
Comments Full approval.
James Wallace:
Address: 104 Barber St.
Comments: Wouldn't even see it. No problem at all: might even
help the neighborhood.
Mrs. Robert Sprabearyt
Address: 519 Rose St.
Commentss No problem with any duplexes or increased density,
as long as the people behave themselves
James Sprabeary & wifet
Address: 502 Rose St.
Comments: He thought it was fines his wife was unavailable.
Robert Caldwell,
Addresss 2604 Jamestown
Commentst Looks great. Would definitely improve the
neighborhood.
Tillman Mend:
Address: 1800 Cordell
Comments: After initial hesitancy, approved
Alice Bur ardti
Addresst 100 Barber (officer ReMax, 2430 I-35E, #216)
Commentat As a realtor, the was in favor of the proposal and
the increased density
t
III
YQY.a-.[Jell M nr[Ae. ~'3~ `R_
Address: 514 Frame St.
Comments: The increased density is good for the neighborhood,
in that it could mean more activity, hence less crime.
Philip Navmik:
Address: 509 Frame St.
Comments[ Looks forward to it. The extra activity will be
great.
Anthony Vidal:
Address: 416 Uland St.
Commentst Has no problems at all with increased density.
Looks fine now, and may have additional comments at
neighborhood meeting.
Marie Henson:
Address: 500 Frame St.
Comments[ Entirely agreeable. Lives in remodeled h<wse at
Frame & Uland.
i
i
i
E
t
r
r
i
! T~~C ATTACHMENT 5
t7 ILI>
F
li ~gz
S fo o SC6 •6y t 1
46.!/ 6~- 43 SO
i
I
i~
I!
I,i
f
g
fir" 13 N0 L3- 42t'
Minutes
Planning and Zoning ATTACHMENT 6
June 230 1993
Page 4
In FAVOR: None
In OPPOSITION; None
The public hearing was closed.
Mr. Glasscock recommended approval of Z-93-0141 Mr.
Engelbrecht seconded, and the motion carried unanimously (6-
0).
V. Hold a public hearing and corsider the rezoning of a 1.419
acre tract to a Planned Development district, and
recommendation of a detailed plan for the purpose of single-
family and duplex residences. 1;- site is located at the
northeast corner of Frame and Uland Streets.
STAFF REPORT: The staff report was given by Owen Yost. Mr.
Yost reported that the applicant was requesting a Planned
Development zoning district by approving a detailed plan, with
the designated uses for duplex and single-family residences.
The site is located at the corner of Frame and Uland streets.
The site is 1,419 acres. No paving of Frame or Uland is
required. However, five ft. of additional right-of-way will
be dedicated by plat, along both streets. Sidewalks will be
required along both streets, water, sewer, and electric
services are available. 61% of the site is permeable, The
site currently is zoned SF-7. The entire area around it is
currently undeveloped, There are some houses on the site.
The homes will help to satisfy the low to moderate housing
needs for the City.
This area has been designated as a low intensity area, and is
allocated 60 intensity trips per acre. The typical use of
this site is allocated 85.14 intensity trips, intensity trips
are only a measure, not how many times a car passes, The City
has been divided into three categories, low intensity,
moderate and high. The low intensity is mainly for
residential use. Medium intensity is for commercial and
retail use. The urban center is the largest. The city is
further broken down into intensity areas. The site is in No
48, and is allocated 60 trips per acre. The intensity area
now has used up ill % of the available trips. It is over
allocated. The allotted intensity is 60 trips per acre. The
applicant is proposing four single family units and twelve
duplex unit on the single family is allocated 10 trips. The
duplex units are also allocated 10 trips, single family units
Thelarearequire
is only allotted the ptrips %e There arellltlallocated
according to the Denton Development Plan in an area that will
Minutes
Planning and Zoning
June 23, 1993
Page 5
require more trips than allotted. The Commission and the city
Council will have to decide if it is the lowest intensity or
best use for the land.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed use as the
least intensive use of the land. During January and February
t
in favor he applicant and myself visited about 15 people. All 15 were
meeting wasfholthe rosal. On March 16t a d, and six people showed up h Thisiindicated
that there was no organized opposition to the plan.
PETITIONER: John C. Johnson, 2905 Pennsylvania, Denton,
Texas. Mr. Johnson said the proposed residential units were
for his own investment. He explained that he tried to keep
his investments in the area of medium and low income families.
He said he had a long list of people waiting to lease. During
four months of remodeling on one unit, he had 14 people ask to
rent. The property is a large size lot. One family had owned
the lot for over 100 years. They built two little frame
houses on the corners and nothing else. He explained that he
spent more than a year cleaning trash and debris from the lot.
It is much nicer now than before. He said he would like to
invite the Commission to intrust him for 6 duplexes and allow
him to provide homes to some of the lower income families.
Mr. Cochran asked if the proposal was for single family or
duplexes.
Mr. Johnson said the proposal was for 800 sq ft. duplexes.
The units would be 2 bedrooms.
Ms. Flemming asked what kind of exterior would be used.
Mr. Johnson said he would use vinyl siding. The units would
be changed so they would not look like rubber stamps.
Ms. Flemming asked if there would be landscaping.
Mr. Johnson said there are a lot of trees and shrubs now.
After the units are built, he could go in and check to see if
additional landscaping will be needed.
Public hearing was closed.
IN FAVOR: None
IN OPPOSITION: None
Mr. Glasscock recommended approval of Z-93-0120 Mr. Cochran
seconded with staff conditions. The motion carried unanimously
16-0) .
E
ai\ord\johnson.o
hGEi i
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE
FROM SINGLE FAMILY - 7 (SF-7) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 1.419 ACRES OF LAND
LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FRAME AND ULAND STREETS; PROVID-
ING FOR APPROVAL OF A DETAILED PLAN FOR THE DISTRICT) PROVIDING FOR
A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF;
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, John C. Johnson has applied for a chango in zoning
for 1.419 acres of land from Single Family - 7 (SF-7) to Planned
Development (PD) zoning district classification and use designation
and for approval of a detailed plan for the district; and
WHEREAS, on June 23, 1993, the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval of the requested change in zoning;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the chango in zoning and
approval of the detail plan will be in compliance with the Denton
Development Plan; NOW, THEREFORE,
1HE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the zoning district classification and use
designation of the 1.419 acres of land described in Exhibit A,
ittached to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference, is
changed from Single Family - 7 (SF-7) to Planned Development (PD)
zoning district classification and use designation under the
comprehe+isive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas,
fiZQ this ordinance by reference it is $ approved attached
asothand e Detailed incorporated
Plan into
for
the district in accordance with Section 35-154 of the Zoning Chap-
ter of the code of ordinances,
SECTION III. That the district shall be subject to the fol-
lowing conditions:
1, Twelve Duplex Units and Four Single Family Units
are permitted as reflected on the detailed plan.
2. Duplex Units shall be limited to two stories.
SECTION IV. That the City's official zoning map is amended to
show the change in zoning district classification.
SECTION V. That any person viol2ting any provision of this
ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding
$2,000, Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated
shall constitute a separate and distinct offense.
Page 1
Y
Agerda tem S ~ejf~ _
SECTION VI. That this ordinance shall become effective
fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City
Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance
to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official
newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the
date of its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1993.
BOB CA3TLEBERRY ,MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCHj CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
Page 2
EXHIBIT A Agsrnd ,,o- >,2;'
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION na ta~ y
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY Of DENTON S
WHEREAS, John C. Johnson is the owner of that certain tract of land situated in the
B.B.B. and C.R.A. Company Survey, Abstract Number 185, Denton County, Texas:
All that certain 1.419 acre tract or parcel of land situated in the B.B.B.
and C.R.R. Company Survey, patented to John R. Henry, Assignee of Scrip
Number 111, Abstract Number 185, being all of a tract conveyed to
Arlo
fromnT.LF.FFieldsObyedeado(fatedo5 MaW, H,
1920Ae and nrecorded in Volume 179, s of Denton County, poage to tJohnoCa ohn on by deed dated I May 1992f and lraccedsd o in avolume tract
3226, page 0087 Real Property Recordml being part of a tract conveyed to
John C. Johnson by dead dated S May, 1992, and recorded in Volume y 3226,
page John 0091 Real by Property ddeed Adateda113beNo ember 01992, t rand recorded in
Volume 3392, page 0105 Real Property Records, said 1.419 acre tract being
more particularly described as followms
BEGINNING at a met half-inch rebar for the northwest corner of the
herein described tract, from which the northwest corner of said son tract 58hminuteso1S seconds (3433/0377 Po)f 7e85 a feeNorth 89 t# said
degrees
beginning also being twenty-five feet east of the centerlineoftthe
existing pavement of Frame Street, and in the occupied south line
of a tract conveyed to V. N. McBride by deed recorded in
Volume 676, page 107 DAi
Thenco with said occupied mouth line South 89 degrees 53 minutes
15 seconds East a distance of 144.74 foot to a found one-half inch
rebar for McBride's occupied southeast corner, same baing the
occupied southwest corner of a tract conveyed to H. E. Burkhardt by
deed recorded in Volume 1974, page 676 RPRI
Thence with Burkhardt's south line, North 89 degrees 48 minutes
09 seconds East a distance of 75,10 feet to a found one-halt inch
rebar for Burkhardt's occupied southeast cornets same being the
occupied southwest corner of a tract conveyed to J. T. Wallace by
dead recorded in Volume 618, page 600 DR1
Thence, with Wallace's occupied south line, North 89 degrees
24 minutes 34 seconds East a distance of 72.44 feet to a set half-
inch rebar for the northeast corner of the herein described tractl
Thence South 00 degrees 02 minutes 47 seconds West with the teat
w lines of said Johnson (3433/0377) and 3226/0081) tracts, passing at
176.43 feet the occupied southeast corner of said Johnson
(3226/0087) tract, same being the occupied northeast corner of said
Le Flora tract, and continuing with the oast line of said Le Fiore
tract a total distance of 211.54 feet to a set half-inch rebar in
the north line of Uland Street as ded fated to the City of Denton
by joad recorded in Volume 776, page 963 DR1
Thence South 89 degrees 53 minutes 41 seconds West with the north
line of Uland street a distance of 293.61 fout to a set half-inch
rebar, said rebar being North 89 degrees 53 minutes 41 seconds East
6,51 feet from the southwest corner of said Johnson (3226/0091)
tract, a).o teing 25 foot east of the centerline of the existing
pavement of Frame Street]
Thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 29 seconds East, twenty five
feet east of and parallel to the centerline of the existing
pavement of Frame Street, a distance of 211.15 feet to the Point of
Beginning, containing in all 1.419 acres of land.
j
k
CITY
COUNCIL
12
IFNI]ffTT
0! 0~
1 N
1 a
O
~ s
0
o0pcoo c
r
nw.y
4pendaNo 9~ 028 R
Aoendal(ernr ~-~8(3
Dale
DATE: August 3, 1993
0
To: Mayor and members of the city Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT! PRELIMINARY AND FINAL REPEATS OF LOTS 20 AND 2
35, SOUTHRIDGE EAST (PHASE ONE) SUBDIVIS oN I 0
20R. o BLOCK
NT0
The Planning 6 Zoning Commission recommended approval on a 4-o
~G~rt~ ~~,,,v~~ote, at its 7/14/93 meeting.
0lux I
The .459
Gatewood Dive tbetw of
r
located on the south side of
Ticonderoga and
currently exists as two adjoining Lafayette Drives, It
being combined via this replat into one vacant lot fortsingle
residential use, which are
amily
There are no public improvements with this re lat
electric transformer, shown on the preliminary
relocated at the p ~ however an
property ownerli3 expense, replat, will be
The development is in a single-family (Sp_lo) zoning district.
Services and facilities, including%later, gas, sanitary sewer,
available, electrical, cable TV and solid waste, are
Adjacent proper,. ownerst as notified of tonsht's public hearing ribed by law
inimum re • The replats chave onform to
ment
the tent minimuaticnslr~haner of the Subdivision and Land Develop-
of the Cede of Ordinances,
~13~$.L DEP RTM NT3 OR can
--------=•~~L'g AFF ~`mrn=
Electric Utilities Dept,
Agendaifem~S e
FIS___CA~ Kpf,ScT; ~ ~ 7
None.
Respect ully subm?ttrd
Prepared by, 1 yd V. Harrell, nager
-kA
:::~7~
G. Owen Yoa~~
e
Urban Plan~ier
Approved by,
a R b no, AICp
Executive rector of
Planning 6 Development
aTTACHM=p
1- location map.
2. preliminary replat.
3. final replat.
4. P&2 Minutes.
AXX0041A
i
is
Agc:i-':Finn,
ATTACHMENT 1
A
~+93-022 Southridge East ~~~~~/iiifff NORTH
I
i L__ J J "lam ~ C~
MA M All
ALEME VISTA AS
C rwr~
' ~ 0 ~ (~-1~ .r aA twn+wn
EI(~ ~ M TO V
N
a ~ B q tl-,~. ~ 9
0
k Lo ooNOEwIT
14
3
~l d
SITE
O
Y ~
IbISON
~r w d
POUT C r
YO ~OlTO MT 0
' 1 RRI/T R10 ~ r p
Location map
Date: 7/6/93 Scale: None
_i
w
u
ATTACHMENT 2
°93.022 Soathridge East NORTH
- - - - -_GAT EW OOD - - --N IVE- -
-
RO (R.O.W.) B C-cK ;a ~0~ 01,
N 880'12' E 143.06' GCE ^yr) bn h LAFA
- DP
b 71.5 ' (~~l ❑E:e y1.53' 6~ ~\Q•
EXISTING
16'x2 ✓ rPANSFcfn~~t
U.E.
~Xf TING
0 LW n/. w
_jJNE
ao ro
LOT 19 BOCK 35 w LOT
LOT 20 6ao
2? zc
+o
z ~ ~ 9 b v,
ztQ bit 7~ONE SF-10
R 4
ACRE
[ j
71.
$ 88/40'29' b4 9. 143.06' 60y Q,.
~5 v iv oQ 7uPAee_ %AvfP.+65 ASSociA 7~OAi
07()Cq: VOL. 2,85 PG. "323
omJ0HN McGOWAN SURVEY A=787
2v
Preliminary Replat
Date: 7/6/'93 Scale. Hone
t:
c
~endaNo.
t~ga~~~altero ~`,S r
ATTACHMENT 3
X93-022 Southridge East NORTH
i
A (50' R.O.W.)
0 GA-TEWOO -------DRWE
486,22' Tt
LAFAYETT
_ N 08 40'12' E 143.06' DRIVE
Q~~ 16'x25' ~
30' DO U.E
LI
i".' iI• M
LOT. 19 BLOCK 35 LOT 22
3 LOT 20R w
0.459: ACRE o+
uw o
? y...........
`Q. S 88 40'29' W 143,06'
N~ "027PPAR4- 5AVt&jGS AezS<XeA7'/Okj
VOL , Z1850 AS. 323
4, w u
JOHN McGOWAN SURVEY Am7° I
Final Replat
Date: 7/6/93 Scale. None
e:
}
A'
1 7 s~ j;
minutes ATTACHMENT 4
Planning and Zoning il~ll l~ul ~ ~y
July 14, 1993
Page 17
the land.
Mr. Cochran made the motion to deny 2-93-013 with the
recommendation that the petitioner re submit for Planned
Development zoning.
The motion failed for lack of a second.
Mr. Cooper made the motion to recommend to council to accept
the staff recommendation but restrict the use only to office,
administrative, or professional. Mr. Engelbrecht seconded and
the motion carried (4-1). Mr. Cochran was opposed.
Chairman Engelbrecht moved to recommend denial to council of
straight Office zoning of Z-93-013 as requested by the
petitioner. Dr. Huey seconded and the motion carried
unanimously (5-0)
IV. Consider the preliminary and final plats of the Simmons
Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. The .2489 acre lot is located on
the west sido of Fulton Street between Congress Street and
Grace Temple Avenue.
STAFF REPORT: By Owen Yost. Mr. Yost reported that the .2489
acre lot is located on the west side of Fulton Street between
congress Street and Grace Temple Avenue. The site is cant a residenti y al astruc ure.ha Theren are no proposed public improvements
needed. The lot is located in a duplex (2F) zoning district.
All city services are available. The plats conform to the
minimum requirements of the Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations; Chapter 34 of the Code of Ordinances.
(Mr. Cochran had to leave the meeting at 9:20).
RECOMMENDATION, The Development Review committee recommended
approval.
Mr. Glassock made the motion to approve the preliminary and
final plat of the Simmons Addition, Lot 1, Block A. Mr.
Cooper seconded and the motion carried unanimously (4-0).
V. Consider the preliminary and final replats of Lots 20 and 21,
Block Gatewood
Drive between Ticonderoga and La Payette Drives.
STAFF REPORT= by Owen Yost. Mr. Yost reported that the
request was to turn two lots into one. There are no public
4 g
A,
S•
AAenda~to ~/3 -C1,2,Q
Minutes
Planning and Zoning 'J 7
July 14, 1993
Page 18
improvements needed. However, an electric transformer will be
moved at the property owners expense. There are two 16ft
utility easements. The development is located in a single
family (SF-10) zoning district.- Mr. Yost said because it was
a residential replat the recommendation would be forwarded on
to Council.
Mr. Glasscock recommended approval of the preliminary and
final replats of hots 20 and 21, Block 35, Southridge East
(Phase 1) Additions into Lot 20R. Dr. Huey seconded and the
motion carried unanimously.
VI. Consider easements abandonments on the east side of Ix t it
block G, of Forrestridge Section II in exchange for granting
easements on the north and west side of the lot.
STAFF REPORT: by David Salmon. Mr Salmon reported that Jim
and Kay Clark, 3501 Forrestridge Drive have requested that the
City abandon the easements across the rear of their lot as
shown in the back up material. In exchange for the
abandonments they have agreed to grant the City additional
easement on the north and west side of their lot. The new
easement will accommodate all of the existing public utilities
on their lot. The 16 ft. easement on Lot 1, Block G, that was
dedicated in the plat for Forrestridge, Section Two and the 20
ft. utility easement that connects E1 Paseo to Ryan Road are
not occupied and will not be needed for future utilities.
RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee recommended
approval.
Dr. Huey asked why the easements were being abandoned.
Mr. Salmon said the easement they are willing to dedicate in
the front of their building will be more beneficial for all
concerned. All lots in Estates of Forrestridge and
Forrestridge Three have the utility easements on the front of
the project.
Mr. Cooper made the motion to recommend approval of the
petition to abandon easements on the east side of Lot 1, Block
G, of Forrestridge Section II. Mr. Glasscock seconded and the
motion carricd unanimously (4-0).
Vii. Chairman Engelbrecht suggested that the two items left on the
agenda for the Directors Report be left for the next meeting
since three of the Commissioners were not available.
VIII.Future agenda items.
a
s
CITY
COUNCIL
X: t
Mol:
TITTI:
Toll:
Q~O 1 D
O
` f NA
o° *g
J% D N t ~ OQ~
DON
agvdaNo- . L5 -O2y
Agodaflem 8G
late _ r' %3-i43
DATE: July 23, 1993
r`~T
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Q
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
Subject: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF 23.25
ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF AND ABUTTING RYAN ROAD ON
FORRESTRIDGE DRIVE.
RECOMMENDATION-,
The public hearing is intended to give all persons interested in the proposed
annexation the right to appear and be heard. The Planning and Zoning Commission
is scheduled to make a recommendation on August 25, 1993.
SUMMARY:
On July 20, 1993, Council adopted an annexation schedule setting the date, time
and place with regard to the proposed annexation (A-62). State law requires that
a service plan be prepared providing for the extension of full municipal services to
the area to be annexed. The service plan, a copy of which is attached, is available
for public inspection and will be part of the annexation ordinance.
BACKGROUND:
The proposed annexation has been initiated by the owners of the tract in order to
facilitate zoning for residential single family development (SF-16). The
development of the tract is proposed to start in 1993. Applications for zoning
change of this tract is being processed concurrently with the annexation.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
All city service departments; including Utilities, Engineering, Planning and
Development, Fire, Police, Solid Waste, Environmental Health, Parks and Recreation,
and Library.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The annexation and ultimate development of this area will expand the city's tax
base.
Page 1
Agc~-c'afla~t ~~c
Leto - - ~3
Respect submitted:
Lloyd V. Marren
City Manager
Prepared by:
Todd Parton
Urban Planner
Approved:
Frank N. Robbins, CP
Executive Director for
Platuiing and Development
Page 2
ATTACHMENT
A-62 Forrest Ridge Annexation NORTH
n
C ~ ; off/
J ,
g'
1 N0650N
e
IOU1N 'f f, F
YO ICITO NT 0 1
RRpT RI°
oopl 1 x
~r
cM, f
' tL m4 cr
~iT ltoR
RYAN
• RYAN I '
Location Map
baler 7/12/93 Scale! None
It
t
ATTACHMENT 2 ken^ 4'0w_~/,
ESTATE OF FORRESIRIDGE# SECTION Ill
v
Being a tract of land situated in the A
Abstract No. 4981 Denton County, Texas andibeingSarVar
"Tract I" of that certain parcel of land described i
pars of
trncts and conveyed bY deed from rSt Savings
Association, to LodgeConstructioniCom
panxas Inc. reco two
Volume 1115, Page 2110 Deed Records Denton ou recorded in
and being further described as foilowsCount Y. Texas
BEGINNING at a 1/2" iron rod found for corner, said corner
being the Southwest corner of
Forrestridge, Section I, an addition'tol he City oftDent of
Denton County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in
Cabinet i city Denton,
Page 151, Plat Records Denton County, Texas)
msaidinuteas 05 ,332.10 feet to a 1 2" ' seconds, East, along
corner being the Southeastocornerfo nioto~,cornertance of
1addition) ► said
, Block C of said
THENCE South 00 degrees, 37 minutes, , along
a fence for a part of the distance 33 Seconds West
to a fence post for corner in the NorthilinecofoR 721.oid, feet
said corner being the Southeast corner o-)f said Lodge
Construction Company tract) Yan Road,
THENCE North 89 degrees, 22 minutes,
the North line of said Ryan Road, adistancenof 1e315.61ofeet
to a 1/2" iron rod found for corner at a fence corner and in
the West line of said survey and in the North line of Ryan
Road, a public roadway, said point being the Southwest corner
of said Lodge Construction Com an Yan
P Y tract)
THENCE North 00 degrees,19yminutes, 42
810.95 he We feet to the seconds Most, along line of sai
t
a distance
Acres or et to the Square OF BEGI?vNINGgAndycontainin 21.2 5 of
Feet of Land, more or less.25
4
kk
R
ATTACHMENT
v s'
SERVICE PIA
Annexation Number A-62
Acreage annexed: 23.15 Acres
Location: North of Ryan Road on F
orrestridge Drive
A. Police Se•v ces
1• Patrolling, response to calls, and other routine
services will be provided on the effective date of
the annexation, using existing personnel and
equipment.
2• Upon ultimate development of the area
level of police services will be the same
area as are furnished to comparable provided
the City,
B. FA re protection and Emergency
---~-~~.uedical services. fEMS1
1• Fire protection and emergency medical services by
the present personnel and present equipment, within
the limitations of available water and distances
from existing fire stations, will be provided to
this area on the effective date of the annexation,
2. Upon ultimate development of the area,the same
level of fire and emergency ambulance services will
be provided to this area as are furnished to
comparable areas within the City.
C. Water/Was ewater Sees
Water and wastewater services will be extended to the
property In accordance to the City's master utility plan
and Section 34-118 of the Denton Code of Ordinances.
Developers shall pay the actual cost of all water and
sewer main extensions, lift stations and other necessary
facilities required toserve their development in
accordance with the City's master utility plan and the
V
~r
f
Subdivision and Land Development Regulations.1y~ _
The City may participate in the cost to oversize watery
and sewer mains subject to fund availability and approval
of the City Council.
Where water or sewer main extensions, lift stations,
force mains or other necessary facilities are installed
by the developer, the developer shall be entitled to
reimbursement of the cost of such facilities from pro-
rata charges paid by persons connecting to or using such
facilities to serve their property, according to the
Subdivision and Land Development Regulations,
D. Solid Waste Coll c o
Solid waste! collection will be
property at the same level of servicevasea.,ailable
erab~e
of thmpa
date of within annextion,within 60 days
2. As development and construction commence within
this property, and population density increases to
the proper level, solid waste collection shall be
provided to this property in accordance with then
current policies of the city as to frequency,
charges and so forth.
E. gJ#gots an-- Roads
1. The City of Denton's existing
to street maintenance, applicable cthroughout gthe
entire City, shall apply to this property leginning
with the effective date of the annexation.
2. Routine maintenance of streets and roads will begin
in the annexed arpa on the effective date of
annexation using the standards and level of service
as currently applied to comparable areas of the
city,
3. Reconstruction and resurfacing
Installation of storm drainage of streets,
construction of curb cuts and facilities,
gutters, major improvements, as theneed thereforohis
determined by the City Council or Manager, will be
accomplished under the established policies of the
city.
4. Traffic signals, signage and other triffic control
devices will be installed as the need therefor is
2
~I
J'I
established b a
standards, y ppropriate study and traffic
5• Street and road lighting will be installed in the
substantially developed areas in accordance wic!;
the established policies of the city.
F. Environmental Health and Code Enforcement
Services
1• Enforcement of the City's environmental health
ordinances and regulations including, but not
limited to the grass and weed ordinance, garbage
and trash ordinance, junked vehicle ordinance, sign
ordinance, food handler ordinance, animal control
ordinance, and the tree preservation ordinance
shall be provided within this area on the effective
date of the annexation. These ordinances and
regulations will be enforced through the use of
existing personnel,
2. Building, plumbing, electrical
construction codes, as may be adoptedaby the Cityr
will be enforced within this area beginning with
the effective date of the annexation. Existing
personnel will be used to provide these services.
3. The City's zoning, subdivision and other ordinances
shall be enforced in this area beginning on the
effective date of the annexation.
4• All inspection services provided by the City of
Denton, but not mentioned above, will be provided
to this area beginning on the effective date of the
annexation. Existing personnel will be used to
provide these services.
5• Flood damage mitigation will be provided by
existing codes and ordinances of the City as of the
effective date of the annexation.
6. As develoC:aent and construction commence within
this area, sufficient personnel will be provided to
furnish this area with the same level of
environmental health and code enforcement services
as are furnished to comparable areas within the
city.
Planning and D yelonmen* a s
The zoning juriediction of the City will extend to the
annexed area on the effective date of annexation. Single
3
1.7
Family (SF-26) zoning
this tract. classification is anticipated fo
'r;/4'1_P
• I • Parks and ue,.+...,. ~ _
Residents of the newly annexed area may use all recreation
facilities, including parks and swimming pools throughout
she
the city, on the effective date of the annexation. The
standards and policies now used within the city will
be followed in the maintenance of
swimming pools. parks, playgrounds and
J• Eleatrie~_piatrih„~y
i
Electiical power will be made available to the site as
required, at the same level of service currently being
provided to comparable arras within the City.
K• MiscellaneoLa
Street names and signs will be installed, if required,
approximately six (6) months after the effective date of
annexation.
Residents of the newly annexed area may use all
owned facilities, buildings or services within the city on
the effective date of the annexation. All publicly owned
accordance with estGbli hed standardsi nd Policies maintained now used
in the City.
L• Cadi-- ta---1 Tm~rov me"ts n.
The CIP of the city is prioritized by such policy guidelines
ass
1. Demand for services as compared to other areas will be
based on characteristics of topography, land utilization,
comparable areaot establi hed otechnicals stand rdsdand
professional studies.
z• The overall cost-effectiveness of providing a specific
facility or service.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP improvements in
the upcoming CIP plan. The annexation area rill be considered
according to the same established criteria as all other areas
of the City.
4
i'
CITY
COUNCII
ago, o
0
Oa
~Op,~r ♦op
~~QDCOGCCCr~'~~
f
Agenda No 93 -01 b'
Agenda Item 1", 916
Cate !
DATE: August 3!( 199V
BUM
TO: Mayor and members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd v. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY REPLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK A OF THE DENTON SQUARE
SHOPPING CENTER, INTO LOTS 1R AND 2R.
BECOMMENDA=I
The Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval by a 7-0
vote, at its 7/28/93 meeting.
MOM :
The 9.5079 acre tract is located at the northeast corner of
Teasley Lane and Interstate 35-E.
Currently, Denton Square Shopping Center is sited
on
the
proposed Lot 1R (8.3485 acres). This use will continue, with
the provision that the second floor not be occupied due to
inadequate parking. The proposed toot 2R (1.1594 acres) is
currently a vacant pad site, and is envisioned for an
pplebee s restaurant.
The only public improvement required with this replat is ap-
proximately 905 lineal feet of Concrete sidewalk along the IH-
35 frontage road. The sidewalk is proposed to be 5 ft. wide.
mQuE UND:
The site is in a commercial (C) zoning district, and is
surrounded by C zoning.
TLe
reviewedtina1986igwaslneverl filed with b nton 1984, A
The shopping center is re-striping the existing parking lot to
support the parking needs of current uses, in accordance with
the Subdivision Regulations. When this is accomplished, all
current uses will have adequate parking.
Services water, as,, to lephoneand
falectcilriities,
and esolid waste, are avaiable.sewer,
t
i
n„•, ,
The replat conforms to the minimum requirements of t~
Subdivision and Land Development Regulations; Chapter 34 of
the Code of Ordinances.
PROGRAMS. DEP RTH WTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
None.
FISCAL IMPACTS
None.
Respectful y submitted,
~U
Lloyd Harrell, Citj~V Manager
Prepared by,
G. Owen ASLA
Urban P1 nner
Approved by,
AanH '%Xnso AICP
e ireotor Of
Planning & Development
gTTACHMENTSC
1. Location map.
2. Original plat (1984).
3. Preliminary replat.
4. P&Z Minutes.
AXX00418
ATTACHMENT 1
enton Square Shopping Center (Applebee's) NORTH
J._~DA
4E.. _
r MA V AR
ALEFAE V61A A S DA.
G \
® YYA11 nYfAi•YJfI 1
L \ ` TO IP
C'
t L910EMV
. .gem
C
Location
Date: 7/22/93 Scale; None
ATTACHMENT 2
Denton Square Shopping Center (Appfebee's) NORTH
~M AU WU
fit-- -cam
i ~ ~M1IJ
MS +
~ ! r!
3 Vvm
~ Ilr ru
ex.
Pot 5 N Ndi, (M
• tot 1 81ock A P
9.5074 Acres
00
VIP
Iliac- L-11
`1~~Mea~N M RM ON=E" ~
M
a Sley ~
1984 Plat
Date: 7/2203 Scale: None
I
ATTACHMENT 3
NORTH
:nton Square Shopping Center (Applebee's)
+ m~ TEA YOL44 +
Nor '
7rri r
P
,
1 h
t
0 / ti ar 33 [ 1"
. i~
. Il_ 11-r ~ ~ ~ ~ l ti
BLOCKBUSTER
WOE
o ~ .R
+ N'AfW .rY f4M. N ,
r A • 1'
nl'W~l.7E6T~
. ~lldX.+_• ~
Date: 7/22/'93 Scale: None
RECONIENDATION: The Denton Development Plan recomended approval ,
Mr. Cochran made the motion to approve the General Development Plan of 8.72
acres located on the northside of University Drive, between Georgetown & Gay
Streets. Mr. Cooper seconded the motion, and the motion carried (7-0).
1V Consent Agenda:
a. Consider the prelininary replat of Lot 1, Block 1, of the M.D. Adkins Addition,
located on the northwest corner of University & Georgetown.
b. Consider the preliminary replat of Lot 1, Block A of the Denton Square
Shopping Center Into Lots 1R and 211 The 9.5079 acre tract Is at the northeast
corner of IH-35E & Teasly Lane.
Dr. Huey made the motion to approve the consent agenda. Mr. Cochran
seconded, the motion carried (7-0).
V. Consider authorising the removal of 115 protected trees, according to Chapter 31
of the Code of Ordinances, as per plans submitted by the Upper Trinity Regional
Water District.
STAFF REPORT: given by Gerald Cosgrove, Engineering Administrator, Water
amd Waste Water Department.
Mr. Cosgrove reported that a preliminary presentation had been presented at the
March 10, 1993 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. He explained that he
was bringing back the survey that was done to identify 115 protected trees in the
permanent easement and 60 protected trees In the construction easement of the
new water line along Lillian Miller and Teasley. He explained that the following
steps had been taken to minimize the affects on the trees:
1. The selected alignment has the least affect on protected trees, compared to
the other alternatives.
2. The routing along Lillian Miller and Teasley was selected to minimize the
Impact on trees. Also, construction easements were not obtained along the
first 4,400 feet of the pipeline to save a heavily forested area. This was made
possible by Jerry Clark of the Engineering and Transportation Department.
He will allow the contractor to use one lane along Lillian Miller during
construction.
3. The UTRWD worked with the property owners to minimize tree removal and
to determine their preferred routing across their property.
4. The UTRWD obtained temporary construction easements in the area. The
area is heavily forested. The UTRWD shall not allow the contractor to use
CITY
COUNCII
ono, o
It oo
s~
"to ~+000
°0ooca~coo~°
ORDINANCE NO. gaO?~3
Aawa No _
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING A COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDIWYCNI*BZOSW
FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES%tOR-SERVIGES+
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVI 3NG FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ~~t~C,
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated com-
petitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equipment,
supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of stare law
and City ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has
reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or
services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for
the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the ma-
terials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted
herein; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the numbered items in the following numbered
bids for materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the
"Bid Proposals" attached hereto, are hereby accepted and approved
an being the best responsible bids for such items:
BID ITEM
NUMBER NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
1512 A.I RENT METER $ 21.15 UNIT PRICE
1512 A.5 RENT METER $ 200.00 UNIT PRICE
1512 8.1 RENT METER $ 56.15 UNIT PRICE
1512 B.2 RENT METER $ 71.00 UNIT PRICE
1512 A.2 BADGER METER $ 34.20 UNIT PRICE
1512 A.3 BADGER METER $ 60.49 UNIT PRICE
1512 A.4 INDUSTRIAL INTL $ 147.00 UNIT PRICE
1512 B.3 INDUSTRIAL INTL $ 89.25 UNIT PRICE
1512 B.4 INDUSTRIAL INTL $ 173.25 UNIT PRICE
1512 8.5 INDUSTRIAL INTL $ 231.00 UNIT PRICE
1519 ALL SMVART AND STEVENSON EXHIBIT "A"
1524 1 JAGOE PUBLIC $ 21.75 TON
1524 3 SOUTHERN ASPHALT $ .5405 GAL
1524 7 SOUTHERN ASPHALT $ .6715 GAL
1524 8 KOCH MATERIALS $ .75 GAL
1524 10 VUIP-AN MATERIALS $ 22.70 TON
1524 11 VULCAN MATERIAIS $ 22.70 TON
1525 1 POLELINE $ .71298 PER FT
1525 2 WESCO $ .794 PER FT
1525 SA NESCO $ 1.54 PER FT
1525 6A WESCO $ .83 PER FT
1525 3 TEMPLE $ 1.033 PER FT
1525 4 TEMPLE $ 4.124 PER FT
1525 5 WATSON $ 1.4719 PER FT
1525 6 WATSON $ .8208 PER FT
1525 1 WATSON $ .5801 PER F"r
1525 8 WATSON $ .7265 PER FT
it
I
I
i
AG N,)
SECTION 11. Th_t bl, the acceptance and app ~4o, f the abovez~>i` q
numbered items of the submitted bids, the City aMi4~t~~ he"offir-a
the persons submitting the bids for such itePf.#r_and__agreos-_t
purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services
accordance with the terms, specifications, standards, quantities 6.i
and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid
Proposals, and related documents.
SECTION IIi. That should the City and persons submitting ap-
proved and accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter
into a formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance,
approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his
designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the
written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the
written contract is In accordance with the terms, conditions, spec-
ifications, standards, quantities and specifiec' sums contained in
the Bid Proposal'. and related documents herein approved and
accepted.
SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the above
numbered items of the submitted bids, the City Council hereby
authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and In
accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written contract
made pursuant thereto as authorized herein.
SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective imme-
diately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1993.
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
> If
Agea~a~te de 111!2 !~j
DID 1519 - PAGE 1
DID NAME AUTOMOTIVP FILTERS STEWART 1 -r/C d Zn
1 AND I
OPEN DATE JULY 8, 1993 I STEVENSON 1
# 1 QUANTITY I DISCRIF17ON I VENDOR I EXHIBIT "Ao
.I I I _I
I. I 1 OILFILURS I 1
11 30 I NAPA # 1064 1 $1.65
21 744 I NAPA # 1063 1 $1.91 1
3 1 20 I NAPA # 1147 1 $2.17
41 12 1 NAPA # 1197 1 $4.1.11
51 80 I NAPA # IM 1 $2,081
6 1 24 I NAPA # 1307 1 $2.20 1
71 121NAPA #1374 1 $2.921
81 188 1 NAPA#1515 I $1.951
91 28 I NAPA#1750 I $3.191
101 88 1 NAPA* 1794 I $3.941
1 1 I 1
It. I I IIYDRAULIC 1
11 1 40 1 NAPA # 1408 I $4.96 1
121 4 1 NAPA # 1954 1 $3.07 1
I I I I
I11. 1 I TRANSMISSION 1 1
13 I 404 I ATP #942-1-7470 I $2.191
141 24 1 Al? #D44-1-4949 I $2.7.11
15 1 6 1 ATP #B37-1-4888 I $1.83 1
161 228 1 ATP #B62-1-3036 1 $2.981
Ill 36 1 ATP #867-1-7350 I $3.761
181 20 1 NAPA #1860 I $7.47 1
191 140 1 NAPA # 1892 I $13.461
1 1 I 1
1V I I A7RFILTERS I 1
201 424 1 NAPA #2020 I $2.291
211 41NAPA #2045 I $16.841
221 260 1 NAPA #2073 1 $2.181
M I 28 1 NAPA #2122 1 $4.621
u I 12 1 NAPA #2250 I $9,761
25 1 40 1 NAPA #22M I 54.45 1
261 8 1 NAPA *1121
271 12 1 NAPA #2305 1 $6.871
281 4 1 NAPA #2611 1 $26.60 1
291 4 1 NAPA #2706 I $26.60 1
101 60 1 NAPA 02714 1 $1.55 1
.111 4 1 NAPA #2947 1 $8.291
321 81NAPA #2992 1 $1.021
33 1 36 1 NAPA #6166 I $9.34
341 .16 1 NAPA# 65 30 1 $13.741
35 1 4 1 NAPA #6840 1 $45.33 1
361 4 1 NAPA #6976 I $1.43 1
i
,,.-.max
BID # 15 19 - PAGE 2 rn~arVD C
sl
I A~VdA, _ o'le
BID NAME AUTOMOTIVE FILTERS 1 1eL"-.L' l
I STEWAR7~
I AND ! '7
OPEN DATE JULY 8, 1991 l/
STEVENSON
# I QUANTITY) DESCRIPTION J ERHIBLT "A"
VENDOR 1
V. ! 1 i !
FUEL
.371 384 1 NAPA #3054 1
1 381 12 ! NAPA #3081 $1,821
391 100 ! NAPA #3166 1.81 1
1 $2.81 1
40 1 4 I NAPA #3219
411 148 ! NAPA #3271 I 53.21 1
42 1 64 I NAPA #3336 ( S1.11
1
431 4 + NAPA #3452 1 $3.64 1
441 4 ! NAPA #3511 1 $4.97 1
45 1 12 ! NAPA #3811 1 $1.471
1 ! I $3.131
Vi11 1 WATER ! !
461 68 I NAPA #4071 1
471 8 1 NAPA #4428 ! $6.001
48 1 I DISCOUNT OFF CUR RENT PRICE ! 50% $4.22
I 1 LIST FOR ALL ITEMS NOT LISTED 1 1
i ABOVE % +
50 9 1 I INVENTORY STOCK PER WK I ONCE A WEEK 1
4
+ TIME TO FILL ORDERS 1 2 DAYS 1
I
TOTAL AMOUNT $12,162.14
i
A~nndaNo. b'
a~ei~a~tam w•S io/I
AUGU3, 1993
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM, Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID # 1512 - WATER METERS
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder meeting
specifications as allows:
ITEM, STANDARD WATER METER VENDOR PRICE
A.I. 518" X 314" KENT METER $ 21.15
2. 314" X 314" BADGER METEk $ 34.20
3. 11" BADGER METER $ 60.49
4. 1 112" INDUSTRIAL INTL $147.00
5. 2" KENT METER $200.00
ITEM REMOTE READ METER VENDOR PRICE
B.I. 5181' X 3141" KENT METER $ 56.15
2. 3/4" X 314" KENT METER $ 71.00
3. l"' INDUSTRIAL INTL $ 89.25
4. 1 112" INDUSTRIAL INTL $173.25
5. 2"" INDUSTRIAL INTL $231.00
SUMMARY: This bid Is for the annual estimated purchase of water meters to be
stored and issued by the Warehouse. These prices will be held firm for one year and
quantities will be ordered as needed by the Water Meter Department. Item A.S. is
being recommended to be awarded to Kent due to the fact that Badger Meter has a
split delivery of 30-60 days and Kent's delivery was 30 days, therefore there Is
not a "tie" bid.
Three bid proposals were received in response to six invitations mailed out.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet.
FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted funds for Working Capital Warehouse Water and Sewer
Account #710-043-0582-8709 with a balance for 1992.93 Fiscal Year $40,090.38.
I
u;f.ndlPJO '
ray.- ~11111(rf
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AUGUST 3, 1993
PAGE 2 OF 2
A Respect lly submi to s
o d Harrell
City Manager
Prepared by:
ame: Den se Harpool
Title: Senior Buyer
Approved:
-010
Dame: Tom D. 3 aw, C. P.M.
Titlei Purchasing Agent
agenda. 394
Agenn No
BID5 1512 1 I I < fG
I
BID NAME WATER METERS INDUSTRIAL J BADOER METER I XE T METERS I
INTERNATIONAL I 1
OPEIE DATE JUNE 8, 1943 1, I I I
I4UANTITYI DESCRIPTION VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I
-1-1
I { I
A. STANDARD WATER METERS I 1 1 1
I I I I I I
1. 1 2500 1 5/8 X 3/4 $21.32 I $21.59 I $21.15
2. I 50 I 3/4 X 3/4 I $38.85 I $34.20 I $36.00 J
3. I 50 I 1" I $65.10 I $60.49 I $61.15 I
4. I 60 I 1 1/2" I $147.00 I $151.30 I $150.00 I
5. I 75 I 2" I $210.00 I $200.00 I $200.00 I
I I I I I I
S. REMOTE READ METERS I I I E
1. I 100 I 5/8 X 3/4 $56.70 I NO BID I $56.15 J
2. I 25 I 3/4 X 3/4 I $75.60 I NO BID + $71.00 I
3. I 50 f 1" I $89.25 I NO BID I $96.15 I
4. I 30 I 1 1/2" I $173.25 I NO 810 I $185400 I
5. 1 40 I 2" I $231.00 I NO BID I $235.00
1 1 DELIVERY I 30 DAYS { 5-60 DAYS ( 30 DAYS I
I I I I I 1
Agm~Vjo
Age. 01,2 i `S -'/a X
10,11 REl_AUG UST,.3,-1993
CITY COUNCIL REPORT'' Z d
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
j SUBJECT: BID #1519 - FILTERS (AUTOMOTIVE)
RECOMMENDATION: Council Approve award of Bid #1519 - Filter (Automotive) to the
ow b rider meeting- specifications, Stewart and Stevenson, for an estimated
$12,000,00 per year.
SUMtIVIARY: Bids were received for the price comparison of automotive filters to be
used in the City's fleet. The bid is being awarded on a unit price basis (see Exhibit
A). Seven vendors submitted bids for evaluation on these Items.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet, Memorandum from Jack Jarvis, Fleet
Superintendent
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Fleet Services
FISCAL IMPACT: Funding Is available In account #710-025-0583-8702 (Garage Parts
Invent)ry) with a current balance of $48,704.13
o.od fuiily su ted:
Harrell
City Manager
Approved:
L ~;,1
ame: Ian a Harden
Title: Buyer
DID # 1519 - PAGE 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I
BID NAME AUTOMOTWEFILTFRS I STEWART I NAPAAUTO I PARTS I ROD17RTSON I NAPA All 1'0 1
AND I PARTS I PLUS I FLEET I DENTON 1
OPEN DATE JULY 8, 1993 I STEVENSON I OAINBSVILLE I 1 SERVICES I I
I I I I J J
# I QUANTITY I DESCRIPTION I VENDOR j VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 1
1. I I DIL FILTERS I ( I I I I
1 1 30 I NAPA #1064 1 $1.65 1 S2.461 $3.17 1 $3.12 1 $2.84 1
2 1 744 1 NAPA#1068 1 $1.91 I $2.26 i $1.99 1 $2.22 j $2.33 1
31 20 1 NAPA #1147 1 $2.17 I $252 I $3.25 1 $2.52 1 $2.91 I
4 1 12 1 NAPA # 1197 1 54.13 I $4,57 I S5.90 1 54,42 I $5.28 1
51 801NAPA#1268 1 $2.081 52191 S3.001 $2.201 $2.641
61 24 1 NAPA #1307 1 S2.201 S2.491 S1.99 I 52,73 1 $2.57 1
7 1 12 1 NAPA#1374 1 $2.92 1 S234 1 51.99 i $2.62 1 $2.42 j
81 188 1 NAPA#1513 1 $1.95 1 $2.21 1 $1,99 1 52128 1 52,28 1
91 28 1 NAPA#1750 i $3.19 1 $3.77 I $4.87 1 $3.59 1 $4.36 1
101 88 1 NAPA#1794 1 $3.94 1 $4.62 I $5.97 1 S4.691 55.34 I
I I I I I I I I
IL 1 I HYDRAULIC I I I I I I
11 1 40 1 NAPA #1408 I $4.96 I $5.52 1 57.13 1 55.48 I $6.38 1
121 4 1 NAPA #1954 1 $3.07 I $3.37 1 $4.36 j $3.49 I $1.90 I
1 I I I I I I I
1lI. j I TRANSMISSION I I 1 I I I
331 404 1 ATP #B42-1-7470 I $2.19 I $4.44 I $7.62 1 $3.65 1 $4.75
14 1 24 1 ATP #B44-1-4949 I $2.73 1 $5.48 1 $8.82 1 $3.33 1 0,87 1
13 1 8 1 ATP #1337-1-4888 1 $1.83 1 $4,17 1 $5.87 1 $3.30 1 $294
1
161 228 1 ATP #B62-1-5036 1 $2.98 1 58.82 I $9.42 1 $4,56 1 56.22 1
17 1 36 1 ATP #B67-1-7330 1 S5,76 I 53.09 I $15.72 1 $6,49 ~3 u, a5 $5,99 1
• m p
18 1 20 1 NAPA #1860 1 $7.47 1 $8.73 I $11.28 1 $9.31 cti M $10.08 1
19 1 140 j NAPA 0 1892 1 $13.46 # $20.49 I $26.49 1 520.45", z $23.67 j
I I I I I I a I
1V I 1 AIR FILTERS I I 1 I I
20 1 424 1 NAPA #2020 I $2.29 1 S2.65 j $2.99 1 $2.65 1 w $2.74 1
21 j 4 1 NAPA #2045 1 $16.84 1 $19.18 1 $23.30 I $18.45 U I $21.00 1
22 1 260 1 NAPA #2073 j $2.18 1 $2.52 1 $2,99 1 $2.51 ~y y 0 $2.61 1
23 1 28 ( NAPA #2122 1 $4.62 1 $5.25 i 16.78 1 $5,48 $6.06 I
N
O
°J
Yd C^>u
BID # 1519 - PAOE 2 I I I I I f
I I I I I 1
BID NAME AUTOMOTIVE FILTERS 1 STEWART I NAPA AUTO 1 PART'S I ROBERTSON I NAPA AUTO 1
1 AND I PARTS I PLUS I FLEET DENTON 1
OPEN DATE JULY. 1993 1 STEVENSON I GAINESVILLE I I SERVICES I I
# I QUANTITY I DESCRIPTION J - -J - J . J
I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR { VENDOR 1
-1- 1 - J- I - J J J
24 1 12 ( NAPA #2250 I $9.76 1 $11.551 $14-921 $10.35 1 $13.341
25 1 40 1 NAPA #2286 I $4.45 1 $5.11 1 $6,601 $5.45 1 $5.901
261 8 1 NAPA #2321 1 $14.34 1 515.90 1 $20.53 1 $15.681 S18,361
271 12 1 NAPA #2505 1 $6.87 I $8.39 1 $10.841 $8,33 1 $9,691
281 4 1 NAPA #2611 1 $26.601 $28,371 $36671 $28,601 532,77 I
291 4 1 NAPA #2706 I $26.60 1 $31.391 $40.59 1 511d19 1 $36.27 1
30 1 60 1 NAPA #2714 1 $1.55 1 $1.95 1 $2,51 1 $2.16 I $2,2S 1
31 1 4 1 NAPA #2947 1 $8.29 1 510,72 1 $13.86 1 $10.96 1 $12.39 1
32 1 8 1 NAPA #2992 1 51.02 1 $1.59 1 $112 1 $1.34 1 51.37 1
33 1 36 1 NAPA #6166 1 $9,54 { $10.85 1 $14.02 1 $11.00 1 $12,33 1
34 { 36 1 NAPA #6530 1 $13.74 1 $15.391 $19.90 1 $15.46 I S17,78 1
35 1 4 1 NAPA #6840 1 $45.53 1 $42.28 I $54.66 1 $46.21 1 $48.83 I
36 1 4 1 NAPA #6976 1 $1.43 1 $1.67 I ft P4 1 sf.96 1 $1.65 1
I { I I I I I I
V. 1 1 FUEL I I I I I I
37 1 384 1 NAPA #3054 1 $1.82 1 5166 1 $223 1 $2.29 1 $2.29 {
381 12 1 NAPA #3081 1 $1.81 1 $2.43 { $3.05 1 $2.03 1 $2.39 I
391 I00 1 NAPA #3166 I $2.10 1 $2.44 1 $3,14 1 $2.44 1 $2.81 1
40 1 4 1 NAPA #3219 1 $1.21 1 $3.69 I $4.77 1 $3.52 { $4.27 1
41 1 148 1 NAPA 0 3271 1 $1,11 I $1.41 I $1.11 1 $1,30 1 $1.39 1
,j $5.311
421 641NAPA #3336 1 $3.64 1 $4.621 $5,97 1 $4.82 1}3 t dP
431 41NAPA #3452 1 $4.971 $5.751 $7.431 SS,971io f*L $6.641
441 41NAPA #3511 1 $1.471 51,971 $2.541 $2.001 w x $2.281
45 1 12 1 NAPA 03811 { $3.13 1 $3.75 1 $4.84 1 $3.85 1 - $4.33 1
I { I I I I I I
VII1 1 WATER I I I I\I a I
46 1 68 1 NAPA #4071 1 56,00 1 54.82 1 NIB I $I,B«`I fn $5.51 1
47 1 8 1 NAPA #4428 1 $4.22 1 $4.55 1 NIB { sst I q 5 1
48 1 I DISCOUNT OFF CURRENT PRICF 1 50% { 21% 1 25% 1 35%
LIST FOR ALL ITEMS NOT LISTED I I I I of a 1
I I ABOVE I I I I I I
49 1 1 INVENTORY STOCK PER WK 1 ONCE A WEEK 1 TWICE A WEEK 1 ONCE A WEEK 1 TWICEA WEEK1 ONCEA WEEK I
SO 1 ( T1METO FILL ORDERS 1 2 DAYS 1 1 DAY 1 1 DAY 1 1 DAY 1 2 DAYS 1
•I I 1 I I I I 1
TOTAL AMOUNT $12,162,14 $16,772.68 $20,257.78 515,461.72 $17,498.36
I
i
8
BID # 1519 - PAGE 3 I I I
I I I
BID NAME AUTOMOTIVE FILTERS 1 BEN 1 DICK 1
IVEY I SMIT11 1
OPEN DATE JULY 8, 1993 I OIL 1 INC. 1
- J ! 1
# JOUANTITYI DESCRIPTION I VENDOR 1 VENDOR 1
1. I OIL FILTERS I 1 {
1 ( 30 1 NAPA #1064 $1.24 1 $2.461
2 1 744 1 NAPA #1068 { $2.401 $2.331
3 1 20 1 NAPA #1147 1 $2.74 1 $2.33 1
4 1 12 1 NAPA #1197 $4.86 1 $4.47 f
5 1 80 1 NAPA #1268 1 $2.43 1 $2.25 1
6 1 24 1 NAPA #1307 1 $2.76 1 $2.171
71 12 i NAPA #1374 1 $2.56 1 $2.42 1
8 1 188 1 NAPA #1515 { $2.42 1 $2.22 1
9 J 28 1 NAPA #1750 1 $1.83 1 $1.90 1
101 88 1 NAPA #1794 1 55.10 1 $4,78 1
~ I I I I
IL J 1 IIYDRAULIC 1 I I
11 + 40 1 NAPA #1408 1 $6.07 1 S3J1
1
12 1 4 1 NAPA # 1954 1 $3.71 1 $3.32 1
I I I I I
1[I. 1 J TRANSMISSION I I I
131 404 ATP #B42-1-7470 I 53,501 $3.341
14 1 24 ATP #B44-1-4949 1 S3.33 1 $3.861
15 1 8 J ATP #B37-1-4888 1 $2.57 1 $2.56 i
16 1 228 ATP #B62-1-3036 1 $4.78 1 $4.12
17 1 36 J ATP #B67-1-7350 1 58.20 1 $6.92
181 20 1 NAPA #1860 1 $11.21 1 $9.021 191 140 1 NAPA #1892 1 $25.99 1 $21,191
0
I I I I t {
IV 1 J AIRFILTERS 1 1 1
20 1 424 J NAPA #2020 1 $2.76 1 $2.74
21 1 4 J NAPA #2045 1 518,87 ( 518,80 1 (p
22 1 260 1 NAPA #2073 1 S2.16 { $2.60 1 \ N
231 28 1 NAPA #2122 1 $5.75 1 $5.381 a
III l) # 1319 - PAUIi 4 I I I
I I i
BIDNAME AUTOMOTIVE FILTERS 1 BEN I DICK 1
1 1VEY I SMIT11 j
OPEN DATE JULY 8, 1993 1 OIL 1 INC. 1
-j' 1 1
M UAN-riTY I DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR 1
241 12 I NAPA 02250 I $11.06 I Su,94 1
2s 1 40 1 NAPA 02286 I ss.6o 1 $5.20 1
26 1 81 NAPA #2321 I $17,00 I $16.44 I
27 1 12 1 NAPA #2$05 I $9.06 1 $8.67 {
281 4 1 NAPA #2611 I $32,27 1 $29.34 1
29 1 4 1 NAPA #2106 I $33.63 1 $32.47 1
30 1 60 1 NAPA #2714 I $2.09 { s2.01 1
31 { 4 1 NAPA #2947 j $10.46 1 s11.09 1
32 1 8 ( NAPA #2992 I $1.35 { $1.22 j
331 36 1 NAPA #6166 j $5.67 1 $11.21 1
34 1 36 1 NAPA #6530 I $20,201 $13.92 1
351 4 1 NAPA #6840 I $31.33 1 $43.73 1
361 4 1 NAPA #6976 I $1.87 1 51.47 {
I I I I I
V. I 1 FUEL I $2.19 j $2.OS
37 1 384 1 NAPA 03054
381 12 I NAPA #3081 I $2.16 1 $2.14 1
39 1 100 1 NAPA #3166 I $2.57 1 $2.51 1
40 j 4 1 NAPA #3219 I $3.88 1 $3.82 1
41 1 148 1 NAPA # 3271 I $1.18 I $1.24 I
42 1 64 I NAPA 03336 I $419 1 $4.78 1
43 1 4{ NAPA #3452 I $6.49 1 S5.95 1
44 I 4 1 NAPA #3511 I $2.03 1 $1.82 j
45 i 12 i NAPA 03811 i $4.43 ; $3.87 1 i
Vil1 I WATER I I I _ Q
46 1 68 { NAPA #4071 1 $3.14 1 $4.98 1
47 1 8 1 NAPA #4428 I $4.16 1 $4.70 I \
481 1 DISCOUNT OFF CURRENT PRICE 1 35eA 1 40%
1 { LIST FOR ALL ITEMS NOT LISTED
{ 1ABOVE% I 1 I ` G
49 1 1 I INVENTORY STOCK PER WK 1 ONCE: A WEEK 1 ONCE A WEEK 1 O n
SO 1 j TIME TO FILL ORDERS j 1-2 DAYS 1 1-2 DAYS 1
I I I I I
TOTAL AMOUNT $16,738.00 $13,417.36
AaG~udit0iT1 _1C%.S' /C~.!I.
07-14-93P02:40 0021
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MQKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melanie Barden, Purchasing
FROd: Jack Jarvis, Fleet Supervi.
DATE: July ]d, 1993
I
SUBJECT: Bid Number 1519, Automotive Filters
Of the seven bids we received, the overall lowest and best bid is
Stewart and Stevenson, I recommend awirding this bid to them for
one ,veair, with the option to extend this agreement for additional
one year periods.
TThAnk you for }our help, if you have any questions please call me
at 8421.
I
8111566.8200 D/FW METRO 431.2529
I~A'F B:-A u gall-33-} B93
/A 2 0
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council v
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID #1524 - ASPHALT ROAD MATERIALS
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting
specification or eac Item as bld:
Item 1 - Hot Lay Asphalt to Jagoe Public at $22, 75 'fon
A. Deduct if picked up at plant $ 1.74 Ton
B. Adder for lnatallatlon 200-500 tons $ 8.00 Ton
C. Adder for Installation 501-Greater $ 8,00 Ton
Item 2 - Cold Lay Asphalt deleted from bid by addendum.
Item 3 - AC10 Liquid Asphalt Southern Asphalt ,5404 Gal
Item 7 - Asphalt Prime 310 Southern Asphalt .8715 Gal
Item 8 - AEP Prime Koch Materials . 75 Gal
Item 10 - PB-4 Precoated Aggregate Vulcan Materials 22.70 Ton
Item 11 - PB-5 Precoated Aggregate Vulcan Materials 22.70 Ton
Item 4, 5, 8, and 9 will be presented for award at a later date if necessary. Bid
evaluation Is Incomplete at this time.
SUMMARY: This is an annual contract for street construction and maintenance
materials, Each item will be ordered as needed in appropriate quantities.
BACKGROUND: Tabulatlon Sheet,
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Street Maintenance and
Construction, Engineering Department and Citizens of Denton.
FISCAL IMPACT: Materials will be charged to budget accounts, CIP Projects or Bond
Programs at the time orders are placed.
Respe y ysubtt
Loy Of. Harrell
City Manager
rte ..J T ~Y~..-J
Name: Tom D Shaw, P.M.
Title: Purchasing Agent
~q~nd~.396
I
BID x I524 - PAOR I I I I f
I I I
BID NAME ASPHALT ROAD MAI FRIAL I I
I VULCAN I SOUTHERN I MCS I I JAt)OE
OPEN DATE I I ASPHALT I PETROLEUM I REYNOLDS I PUBLIC
JULY 22, 1993 J 1 & PETROLEUM 1
_ I ASPHALT
I
N I QUAN"r1TY I DESCRIPTION J I J J J
`I-)- VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR
I I SECTION A J J J _ J. J
t. I I I I I 1
HOT MIX HOT LAY ASPHALT CONCRETE I $26.26 I NB I NB I $25.25 I $22.75
1A I I DEDUCTION FOR PICKUP AT PLANT I $5.76 I NIB I NB I $4.25 I S1.75
IB 1200-500 TN I ADD PER TON FOR INSTALLATION f $26.26 i NB i NB f $13.00 I $8.00
I I I
IC 1500 + TON I ADD PER TON FOR INSTALLATION I $26.26 I NB I N/B I $5.001 $6.00
I I,
SECTION B I I I I 1
2. I I COLD LAY ASPHALT DELETED FROM I I I 1
I J BID ADDENDUM I I I
I I I I I I
SECTION C I I I
4, i I ACID LIQUID ASPHALT, I I NB I $0.54 I $0.65 1 NB I NB
1 EMULSION CRS
5. I 1 EMULSION MRS I I NIB f 0.63 I NIB B I NB
$ $0.63 I NI 1 NB
6• I I EMULSION MS-2' i i NB B I N
7. I 1 ASPIIALT PRIM E DOT 310 r 1 1 $0.67 I $0.69 I NIB I NB
8. I I AEP PRIME, I I N/B I I NIB
I I I $0.75 1 NB 1 NB'
9. HOT WATER DILUTION ADDITIVE
I I I I I NB I $059 1 NB 1 NB
I I I I I I I
I I SECr1ON D j I w
10. I 1 PB-4 PRECOATEDAGGREGATE I
s22.70 NB I NB I NB I N o
I I CRUSHED STONE I I
11. I I PH-5 PRECOATED AGGREGATE 1 $22.70 1 NIB I NB I NB I N
I CRUSE IED STONE I I I i
DELIVERY 1 2 DAYS I ~J
I I DAY 1 I DAY 1 I DAY
1~ t
O~4Z~
1~I.Q1~
BID # 1524 - PAGE 2 I I I
I ! I
BID NAME ASPHALT ROAD MATERIAL I KOCH } SUNMOUNT I NO BID
MATERIALS I CORP. I
OPEN DATE JULY 22, 1993 ! I I OOIIMANN ASP II%LTAND CONST
J 1 J
# I QUANTITY I DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR }
-1 J J J J
SECTION A I I I
1. I I HOT MIX HOT LAY ASPHALT CONCRETE I NIB 1 $25.001
IA I I DEDUCTION FOR PICKUP AT PLANT I NIB 1 $3.251
IB 1 20C-SOOTN I ADD PER TON FOR INSTALLATION I NIB I S7.901
f I I I 1
IC 1 500 + TON I ADD PER TON FOR INSTALLATION I NIB 1 $5.001
I I I f I
I I I I I
1 I SECTION B ! I I
2. I I COLD LAY ASPHALT DELTED FROM I I I
1 i BID BY ADDENDUM 1 I I
I I I I !
I 1 SECTION C I I i
3. f I ACID LIQUID ASPHALT, I NIB I N/B 1
4. I I EMULSION CRS-2 I $0.66 1 NIB 1
5. I I EMULSION MRS-2. I NIB I NIB 1
6. 1 I EMULSION MS-2 I $0.661 NIB
7. 1 1 ASPHALT PRIME DOT 310 1 NIB I NIB
I
8. I I AEP PRIME, I 50.71 I NIB I
9. I 1 HOT WATER DILUTION ADDITIVE I $0.07 I NIB I
1 I i I k ;;5' a5
I 1 I ! I
{ 1 SECTION D I 1 I v`
to. I I PB-4PRECOATEDAOOREOATE I NIB I NIB 1 S"3b o
I f CRUSIIED STONE I I I
it. I 1 PH-5 PRECOATEDAGGREOATE NIB NIB 44 I I CRUSHED STONE I I 1 1 N 1
I I DELIVERY I 1 DAYS I I
I I I I I w~ ti
Q
M
~;andaNo
RAIkE: August 3, 1 93
CITY COUNCIL REPORT I ~d
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID it 1525 - WIRE, CABLE, CONDUIT
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder for each
item meeting specification as follows:
QTY/FT Y/FT ITEM DESCRIPTION VENDOR PRICE PER Fr
24,825 1 795 WIRE POLELINE $ .71298
150000 2 410 CU WIRE WESCO $ .794
309000 3 02 CABLE TEMPLE $1.033
30,000 4 500 CABLE TEMPLE $4.124
14,000 5 6" PVC CONDUIT WATSON (LOW PRICE) $1.4719
14,000 SA 6" PVC CONDUIT WESCO (BEST DEL.) $1.54
7,000 6 4" PVC CONDUIT WATSON (LOW PRICE) $ .8208
71000 6A 4" PVC CONDUIT WESCO (BEST DEL.) $ .83
2,200 7 SPACER INT. WATSON $ .5801
1,300 8 SPACER BASE WATSON $ .7265
This is a total expenditure of $240,262.60.
SUMMARY: This bid is for materials to replace warehouse stock which will be used
by the Electric Distribution Department for overhead to underground conversions
in several areas of the City of Denton Electrical System. It will be necessary to
purchase part of the conduit from the vendor with the higher price to assure
delivery of materials for these projects to continue.
The lower prices on item four are for a cable that does not meet bid specifications.
Nine bid proposals were received in response to twenty two invitations mailed out.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet.
FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted Funds for Working Capital/ Warehouse Electric Account
T71582-8708 with a balance of $2480373.92.
vm. r~
Ag?nr.+aNo -C
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
AUGUST 3, 1993 0
PAGE 2 OF 2
Respectfu y submitted:
CLjod V. ~arre 1
City Manager i
Prepared by:
Name: De se Harpool
Title: Senior Buyer
Approved-
Name: Tom D, Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Purchasing Agent
BID # 1525 - PAGE 1 I ( I I f
I I I I I I
810 NAME WIRE, CABLE, CONDUIT I PRIESTER I TECHLINE I LAMBERT I WATSON I PRIESTER
I
OPEN DATE SUPPLY I INC I CABLE I ELECTRIC I SUPPLY I
JULY 24 1993 I I I CORP I I
J J
/ IQUANTITYI DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR ( VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I
1. I K82V I WIRE ALUMINUM, 795
I I (1965' PER REEL) I .7191' I .716' I .78T
I I I I I f .760113' I N/9 I
f I
l I 13,000' I WIRE,COPPERI/9 I I I I I I
I I (1000' PER REEL) I .8307' I ,61' I ,697' I .82)96' I NIB
I
I I
7. I 30,000' I CA9LE,+►1 CONCENTRIC 220ML ( I I I I I
I I (2500' PER REEL) I 1.299' I NIB I 1223' I 1.32601' i 1151' I
I I
I 30,000' I CABLE-500 MCM COPPER, EPR I I I I I I
I I (2500' PER REEL) I 3,830' I N/B I 1,1!11' I 3191012' I 1.156' I
I ~ I I I I I
1. I 2A,000' I CONDUIT WXJV PVC SCJT 40 I 1.72' I 1.117' I NIB I 1.1717 ) NIB
6. j 1+,OW I CONDUIT/'X2a PVC SCx m I A I w I NIB I I I
I .8208• I NAB I
I I I I I ! I I
I T. I 2,200 EA I SPACER INTERMEDIATE W I .92 EA I N/B I NIB ) .5601 EA I NB I
e. i 1,300 EA 'SPACER BASE 6' i .92 EA i NIB i NIB i .7261 EA i NIB I
f!!!
I I DELIVERY I 1 WKS NI I 11-11 DAYS I 21 DAYS A l I 1-6 WKS 1,2,5,6 I 8-10 WKS
I I I 11WKS3A:1 1 I 15 DAYS 12 I 12WKS3R1 I I
I I I 2-3WKS5-8 I I 80DAYS 3A4 I 10 DAYS I& a
I I I 1 I I I ~ c
I I I I I I I _
~ o
bJ 1
~1 ,u » r
81D0 1325-PAOPI {
! I I I I I
BID NAME WIRE, CABLE, CONDUIT I CUMMINS ( TEMPLE i WESCO POLELINE
I ~ I i )
OPEN DATE JULY 22, 199s SUPPLY
{ I I I I
i I QUANTITY I DESCRIPTION , , j )
VENDOR ; VENDOR I VENDOR ( VENDOR 1
R ,
{ 52!' I WIRE,ALUMINUM, 795 I I J ! VENDOR
1. 21,
I I (4963' PER REEL) I .72' I I I I
I ! i .774' I Js' ! .71295' I I
2. { 15,000' IWIRE,COPPER4M I f { I I I
I (1000' PER REEL) I .61•
I I I .e04' { .791• { ,71396' { I
KOW I CABLE,i2CONCENTRIC 220ML { I ( I I
I I (2107 PER REEL.) I 1.216' I f I I
I I I 1.021, I Las' I 1.:24' I
I I I I I I
t 1. { 50,007 I CABLE,SOOMCM COPPER, EPR I I { I I I
(2507 PER REEL) 4.211' i 4.124' i 4.204' f 4.154' I I
5. i 26,007 i CONDUIT 6'X27 PVC SCH 40 ' 1.49' i 1 S6' 1.SS' I I
6. { 14,007 I CONDUIT 4'X27 PV C SCH 40 ( .65' { .569' I I ! I
I I I I .SS' I .6640'
I I ! I
l 7• I 2.200 EA I SPACER INTERMEDIATE 6' I .59 EA I .696 EA I ,TO EA I .773 F-1 I I
6• { L50o EA I SPACER BASE 6' i .77 EA i .79 EA i .79 EA I ,M! EA I {
I I
DELIVERY I S-SALLORNONE { 7-40 DAYS I
I 5-10 DAYS 7-9WK9i1 { 2WKi2
I I 1-2WKSi2 { 10-12WKSS4t4
{ ! I 4WKSi1 f { 10-12WKSSAI I +
I 2 WK!-1
I I I I 10 DAYS it I I 2-s W KS Sd6 I I
6-IOWKS3114 2WKS76t6 { I )
w ~
0
1
s q a
x
CITY
COUNCII
O~ p f p 1
0
O ` 1
f
v
~~QOCdG000~'
~ x
i
ApendaltI m=- 6 f'1
B-'
Date 8
/
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD
OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS: PROVIDING FOR THE
EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFO:?; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated com-
petitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements
in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances;
and
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has receiv-
ed and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest
responsible bids for the construction of the public works or im-
provements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and plans
and specifications therein; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the following competitive bids for the con-
struction of public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid
Invitations", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications on file
in the Office of the City's Purchasing Agent filed according to the
bid number assigned hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as be-
ing the lowest responsible bids:
BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR A;O N
1520 WALTER C. BARRETT $16,039.00
1522 JIM B0414AN CONSTRUCTION CO. $16,900.00
SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above
competitive bids shall not constitute a contract between the City
and the person submitting the bid for construction of such public
works or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such
person shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice
to Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and
furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notification of
the award of the bid.
SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to
execute all necessary written contracts for the performance of the
construction of the public works or improvements in accordance with
the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that ouch contracts
are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and Bid Propos-
als, and documents relating thereto specifying the terms, condi-
!r
AgcD~,rJo, e,z
Ay~~~ca~iam ~~/C~
tions, plans and specifications, standards, quantities and speci-
fied sums contained therein. '
SECTION IV. That upon acceptance and approval of the above
competitive bids and the execution of contracts for the public
works and improvements as authorized herein, the City council here-
by authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the
amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized contracts
executed pursuant thereto.
SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective im-
mediately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1993.
BOB CASTLEBERRY# MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY.,
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
e
at~n:
entiN11o.
t',DATE._.A gust $,-Ig
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID $ 1520 - DEMOLITION AND CLEARING WORK
RECOMMENDATION: Council approve award of Bid $1520 - Demolition and Clearing
Work to Walter C. Barrett, Inc. in the amount of $16,039.00. (This amount excludes
Items 5A - 5C).
SUMMARY: One bid was received for the demolition and clearing work to be done at
seven locations. The property owner of item 5 (1208 Johnson Street) has requested
that any plans to demolish at this location be cancelled, leaving six properties with
a net bid of $16,039.00.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet, Memoranda from Community Development
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Community Development
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this bid are available in account $219-057-CD77-8502
(Special Services) with a current balance of $17,032.00.
i
Reap ully sub ed t
to V. Harrell
City Manager
Approved:
Name: lance Harden
Title: Buyer
~Q~nC~.799
1
F
' k
i
I
BID # 1520 +13 f'
BID NAME DEMOLITION 6 CLEARING I WALTER C.
OPEN DATE JULY 13, 1993 i BARRETT, INC. I
I
# +QTY i DESCRIPTION i VENDOR
1. 1 I 414 EAST MILL STREET I
A I (REMOVE ALL STRUCTURES I ;2,437.00
B I ]REMOVE ALL CONCRETE/FENCE I $400.00 I
C I (GRADE LOT SMOOTH FOR MOWING i ;50.00 I
2 f I I
I f 1220 MORSE STREET I
A ] (REMOVE ALL STRUCTURES I ;1,787.50
B I IREMOVE ALL CONCRETE/FENCE I N/C
C I IGRADE LOT SMOOTH FOR MOWING i $50.00 I
I I I
3. I 1 600 BELL AVENUE I
A I IREMOVE TWO STRUCTURES I
B I )REMOVE ALL TRASH, DEBRIS, ETC $N%C15.00
C I IREMOVE ALL CONCRETE I $150.00
(GRADE LOT SMOOTH FOR MOWING j $50.00 ]
4. ) I 2432 WEST PRAIRIE STREET ] ]
AA I IREMOVE STRUCTURE, TRASH,ETC I ;2,050.00
I IREMOVE ALL CONCRETE FROM SITE I $670.00 I
C I IGRADE LOT SMOOTH FOR MOWING + $50.00 I
5. ) I 1208 JOHNSON STREET ]
A I ]REMOVE STRUCTURE, TRASH, ETC I $1,887.50
e I IREMOVE ALL CONCRETE FOR SITE I $500.00 I
C I IGRADE LOT SMOOTH FOR MOWING + $50.00 I
I )
6. I I 501 NORTH CRAWFORD STREET I +
B I )REMOVE ALLUCONCRETERFROM SITE I $1$460.00
C I (GRADE LOT SMOOTH FOR MOWING + $50.00 I
7. 1 I 338 ROBERTSON STREET
IREMOVE STRUCTURE, TRASH, ETC 1
B I IREMOVE ALL CONCRETE FROM SITE I $3'
C i (GRADE LOT SMOOTH FOR MOWING $50.00
I I
TOTAL AMOUNT
;18,476.50 ~
! LESS ITEM i5
$
I 16,039.00
M
I
Community Development Office
1051* West Hickory Street
C1rY of DENTON, TFXAA Denton, Taxes 76.2014115
MY?) 369-7726
M E_M_0 R_ A_ N_D U M
TO: Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent, Purchasing Department
FROM: Nancy Baker, Housing Rehab Spec., Community Devip. Ofc.
DATE: July 22, 1993
SUBJECT: Deletion of Item 05 11208 Johnson Street) from Bid 01520
Dlr. David 0. Nabors, property owner of the structure located at 1208 Johnson
Street, called our office today and asked that his request for demolition of this
property be cancelled. This structure is included in Bid 11520. 1t&M-fl. Please
take the necessary steps to ensure Mr. Nabor's request is completed prior to the
start of the demolition process by removing Item $5 from the demolition work to
be done on Bid #1520.
If you have any questions regarding this request or need additional Information,
please do not hesitate to call (ext N 7236). Thank you.
Nancy B11 r
cc: Mr, and Mrs. David 0. Nabors
4622 Candlestick St.
Garland, Texas 760,13
"Dedicated to Ouality Service"
i
l
Community Devolopment Office
10514 West Hickory Sheet
CITY Of DENTON, TAWAS Denton, Texas 76201.4115
(617)363.7716
M M O R A N D U M
TO., Tam Shaw, Purchasing Agent
FROM: Barbara Ross, community DewlWwt Administrator
DATE: July 140 1993
SUBJECT: DaWlition Bid 021
The Oomn:utity Dewlopnent Office would like to aooept the bid of Walter C.
Barrett, Incorporated for demolition bid 021. The bid totaled $18,476.50 for
seven structures. Please schedule the bid for council approval as soon as
possible.
Feel free to call me at ext. 7235 if you have any questions or need further
information. lbank you.
Barbara Ross
"Dedicated to Quality Service"
J
Agen
A~arGa!tem f i~,~
AT I?
TCgu~C3; I9Y9~3
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
rte'
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID # 1522 - CIVIC CENTER PARK/CITY HALL SIDEWALK
RENOVATION
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder for
alternate #2, J a~i Bo-wman Construction Co. in the amount of $16,900.00.
SUMMARY: This bid is for the renovation of the pedestrian walkways in and around
the Civic Center Park and City Hall. The project involves approximately 5,100
square feet of existing brick sidewalks. The current Installation has deteriorated
badly and has become a major liability concern,
The base bid was designed to replace the existing brick with new concrete pavers.
Alternates for reusing the existing brick or using new brick pavers were also bid.
The new concrete pavers appear to be the safest and lowest maintenance cost option,
however, they are more expensive and do not offer the aesthetic value of the
existing brick. Staff members and the contractor have made considerable effort to
evaluate all options and based upon longevity, liability, maintenance, aesthetic and
cost, we feel our beat recommendation is to reuse the existing brick as specified in
the bid alternate #2.
a re,3reaentative from Acme B that
cohowever,
k Company has Indicated l a close match necessary,
size is available.
lor and
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet, Memoranda from Tom Shaw & Main Street Denton
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Parks and Recreation
apartment, Bu ng Operations and Citizens of Denton.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this project will come from Park and Recreation Bonds,
ccount num er #445.020-SWLK-9224-9154. Approximately $25,000.00 was made
available for this project,
lL1e 'lly au t ed.,
. HarreiT
City Manager
Ap roved=
ame., Tom D. Shaw, C,P,M.
Titlei Purchasing Agent
apm6~.7 f 1
IL
en~xwy. ay
BID # 1622
J
BID NAME CIVIC CENTER PARK AND CITY HALL JIM BOWMAN
GREEN ~
OPEN DATE JULY 13,1993 CONST• ENTERPRISES
# QUANTIT DESCRIPTION VENDOR
i VENDOR VENDOR -
1
BASE BID (CONCRETE PAVER) $26,70000
$33,155.00
2. ALT #1 (DEDUCT) IF CITY OF DENTON -$4,285.00
REMOVES OLD BRICK -$8,700.00
3• ALT #2 (REUSE OLD BRICK) $18,900.00
$34,725.00
4• ALT #3(NEW BRICK) PAVERS $29,70000
$42,843.00
6• ADDITIONAL CONCRETE PAVERS PER $3.88
SQUARE FOOT $4.85
8 ADDITIONAL BRICK PAVERS PER $4.41 I SQUAREFOOT
BOND YES YES
ADDENDA YES YES
4
Ki ci
W
+k
t
A/
CITY O! DENTON, TEXAS PURCHASING DIVISION / 901•B TEXAS STREET / DENTON, TEXAS 7620
TO: _
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
FROM: Tom D. Shaw, Purchasing Aggntl
DATE: July 21, 1993
SUBJECT: SIDEWALK RENOVATION
As a portion of the bid evaluation process, lengthy discussions have been held with
Mr. Tom Davis, the contractor that will be renovating the Civic Center/City Hall
walkways, We have discussed all of the options as bid (1) use new concrete pavers,
(2) reuse old existing bricks (3) use new brick pavers. An additional option of
placing the old bricks on top of a 4" concrete sidewalk to add stability and improve
the surface was also considered.
Mr. Davis feels that the 4" concrete base option is an unnecessary expense estimated
to cost approximately $8,500,00 and could lead to more complicated maintenance
problems without increasing benefits proportionally. He feels that the cement
pavers, as specified in the base bid is the superior product for longevity, liability
and maintenance. However, when aesthetics and cost are added to the evaluation
process he concurs that accepting alternate N2, reuse of existing bricks, Is the best
option. He does however, offer some suggestions to improve the final product while
remaining cost effective.
1. Substitute a 94 lb per 50 sq feet ratio for the 94 lb to 70 sq A as
epectfied for moll coment stabilization. This will create a substance
similar In consistency to asphalt.
2• Substitute a sand and mortar mix for the sand only filler between brick
as specified. This will reduce the possibility of cracks developing
between brick as sand is washed away and bricks shift,
3• Create specific vehicle crossing areas reinforced with CTB (white rock
and concrete) in place of the soil and concrete stabilization specified.
The additional cost would be approximately $1,000.00 and provide an acceptable,
maintainable, low liability surface for a 10.12 year time period depending upon
weather extremes. In the opinion of the contractor the lay of the land lends itself
to a shorter life expectancy than normal for any smooth surface walkway.
In summary, if longevity, liability and maintenance are our only considerations we
would recommend the base bid of new concrete pavers at $26,700.00 less the
$4,255,00 deduct (if the City of Denton removes the old brick) for a total of
$22,445.00. If the Items to be considered are expanded to include aesthetics and
cost in the evaluation, we would recommend the reusing of existing brick at a bid
price of $16,900, 00 plus the estimated $1,000.00 changes for a price of $17,900,00. "
AG Flr+!aP10
• Aa,~al~2r~ %~-S-----~o b-
-lp
SIDEWALK RENOVATION
JULY 21, 1993
PAGE 2 of 2
This recommendation appears to answer the concerns that have been raised about the
five factors considered in the evaluation process.
this Bruce Henington,
Max Blackburn, Building Operations Superintendent Janet and iI fully concur Planner
we e will that work session presentation
After review
and prepare for Council
with our recommendation Is
know. Otherwise action on August 3, 1993.
S SN. aoa
i
i
i
tvy"'"~'~~AIf-93{'9 G.2 b'
CITY of DLNTON. TzxAs 215 E, MCKINNEYI DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE f817) 5688200
M E M O R A N D U M
July 13, 1993
T0: Tom Shaw, Director of Purchasing
FROM: Jane Biles, Main Street Denton
Cecile Carson, Keep Denton Beautiful
THROUGH: Frank Robbins, Planning Department Direct
RE: Repair of Walkways at Civic Center Park
Tom, would you please include the following recommendation to City
Council in your staff report regarding the repair of the walkways
at Civic Center Park:
The Historic Landmark Commission, the KoeP Denton Beautiful
Board, and the O'Neil Ford Civic Complex Dedication Task Force
have all voted unanimously to urge the City Council to
consider, in keeping with the original site plan and to
maintain consistency of material, using the existing brick to
repair the Civic Center Park walkways.
Minutes of the Landmark Commission and Keep Denton Beautiful Board
will be forwarded to you for inclusion in the back-up. No minutes
were taken at the O'Neil Ford Civic Complex Dedication Task Force
meeting, but I have attached a meeting date, time and list of
members present.
Please call either of us if You have any questions,
a e Bile G h3Q~`
In Street enton Cecile Carson
Keep Denton Beautiful
5
B
F
r;
Historic Landmark Commission , fob
Minutes of July 12, 1993
Page 2of6
DRAFT Ms. Abbott arrived.
IL Receive a report from Mike Cochran and consider a motion urging the City Council to
consider using existing brick material to repair Civic Center Park walkways.
Mr. Cochran stated that the reason he asked to be on the agenda was partly due to the
O'Neil Ford Ceremony planned for the end of July. He explained that approximately one
week ago he read in the newspaper that the city would be taking bids to replace the majority
of the brick around city hall including the walkway going to the Civic Center with a "fake"
brick concrete paver. Mr. Cochran stated that he did not feel that this was a sympathetic
renovation especially considering the fact that the purpose of the O'Neil Ford Ceremony was
to honor an architect of the community who designed the Center, including the brick
walkways.
Mr. Cochran said that he has petitioned the Parks Department asking that they consider
amending the process so that there will be another item In the bid that allows for using the
existing brick. He added that most of the existing brick was in good shape and that the
subsurface was the only thing that Lu& needed to be fixed.
Mr. Cochran continued that he was told, by staff, that the real brick was not as safe as the
synthetic brick and that O'Neil Ford designed the buildings and not the walkways. He said
that he recently went to San Antonio to visit O'Neil Ford's firm. While he was there, he saw
the original plans for the building. The plans specified the type of brick in its current basket
weave pattern. He felt that since the arc! itect had the bricks in his plans, they should be
the same bricks used.
Mr. Cochran stated that he had asked Rich Dlugas, Director of Parks and Recreation, which
engineer had determined the safety of the brick versus the concrete pavers. Mr. Dlugas
replied that he had contacted the City Engineer, Jerry Clark, for an opinion. Mr. Cochran
then asked Mr. Clark what research was used to determine that concrete pavers were safer
than bricks. Mr. Clark responded that the safety issue was his own opinion because the
shape of the pavers selected allowed for closer bonding.
Mr. Cochran stated that at the last O'Neil Ford Task Force meeting, the task force voted
unanimously to urge the city to seriously consider using real bricks on the walkway, The
Keep Denton Beautiful Committee has also voted unanimously to encourage the use of real
bricks. He added that using the existing bricks and replacing only the broken bricks would
be more cost effective. Acme Brick Is considering donating the replacement bricks.
Ms. Abbott stated that she received a phone call from someone from Texas Architect
magazine regarding the demolition of the swimming pool but avoided an interview,
Mr. Cochran stated that he also received a call and did give an interview. Ms. Abbott added
that this is what could happen if another architectural feature Is destroyed.
c
i
Aahlo~~ ~ -
Historic Landmark Commission A :^,da f2,y S~ /o
Minutes of Jul 12, 1993
Page 3 of 6 DRAFT
Ms. Abbott stated that Libby Willis, Texas/New Mexico Office of the National Trust for
Historic Preservation, sent out a press release regarding the demolition of the pool.
Ms. Biles read the press release, as follows:
The attached article was in this mornings edition of the Dallas Morning News:
I talked to Judith Abbott, Chairwoman of the City's Historic Landmark
Commission, who said the demolition actually occurred in February. She said
this article was written now because the City of Denton now wants to remove
the brick sidewalks at the Civic Center Park. Judith also said she has
requested a workshop with the Denton City Council to propose the
designation of the Civic Center Park as a historic district. Denton does not
have a historic resources survey. The Landmark Commission has been
working with the city to secure funding for a survey. It is obviously extremely
unfortunate that Ford's structure was destroyed. I suggested to Judith that the
city revise its preservation ordinance to include demolition delay procedures.
for all O'Neil Ford structures and any other architecturally significant
contemporary structures in Denton. 1 also suggested that the upcoming
July 31st ceremony renaming the Civic Center Park, in honor of Ford, would
be the perfect time for the Mayor to announce the city's commitment to
protecting other Ford buildings in the city. 1 have provided Judith with the
Trust Information Sheets on creating local historic districts and preserving
architecture of the recent past.
Ms. Biles stated that it then lists Judith Abbott and Mike Cochrans' phone numbers.
The press release was sent to the following:
Preservation Newsletter
Texas Architect
The Medallion
Preservation Texas Newsletter
National Trust Annual Best/Worst List
Ms. Cole suggested sending a press release that Is positive for the City (i.e. using the existing
bricks to repair the walkways). Ms. Abbott agreed.
Ms. Abbott asked what the status of the brick was. Mr. Robbins replied that the request
from Mr. Cochran is regarding the material used. Mr. Robbins added that there are several
bid options with one being to use the existing brick or brick material.
Ms. McCain asked if the brick or pavers would be relayed In the same basket weave
pattern. Mr. Robbins stated that it was in the bid to be in the Fame pattern.
Historic Landmark Commission Ate; It r a .rc._5 ~C~,
Minutes of July 12, 1993 DRAFT
Page 4 of b
Ms. Biles asked if the city was bidding all alternatives. Mr. Robbins said yes.
Ms. Abbott asked Ms. Simpson why the bricks had to be replaced. Ms. Simpson replied
safety and liability issues. People have fallen and one woman recently broke her arm in the
fall. Ms. Simpson added that the existing bricks are very slippery when wet.
Ms. Holcomb asked what was wrong with using the existing brick. Ms. Simpson stated that
there are both pros and cons. The pros and cons include the fact that the concrete pavers
have a rougher texture and the corners are beveled. Beveled corners help prevent chipping
and cracking as easily as the existing brick. Both the bricks and the pavers carry the same
strength and will have approximately the same life span. Ms. Simpson added that when she
spoke with a representative of Acme Brick, she was told that the narrowness of the existing
bricks aided in the instability of the bricks. The brick pavers are wider and were made for
this purpose.
Ms. Simpson added that the goal of the Parks Department Is to provide a solid, stable and
safe walking surface. If the goal can be accomplished by using the existing bricks and the
City Council determines it is the best alternative, then that is what will be done.
Ms. McCain left the meeting.
Ms. Abbott asked if the person who broke their arm was in heels. Ms. Simpson stated that
she was wearing tennis shoes.
Ms. Bays stated that she felt using the existing bricks would seem the most cost effective for
the city.
Ms. Cole stated that if the broken bricks are replaced, the replacement bricks will not look
the same, Ms. Simpson agreed.
Mr. Cochran stated that he suggests, in an advisory capacity, to let the City Council know
what the Historic Landmark Commission feels.
Ms. Bays moved to urge the City Council to consider using the existing brick material to
repair the Civic Center Park walkways. It was seconded by Ms. Holcomb.
Ms. Cole moved to amend the motion to add "in keeping with the original site plans by
O'Neil Ford because there would be two different materials on existing sidewalks".
Ms. Bays withdrew her motion.
Ms. Holcomb withdrew her second.
Ms. Cole moved to urge the City Council to consider using the existing brick material to
i
a
f
R
s
a
Y
Historic Landmark Commission
„:f--
Minutes of July 12, 1993 CRAFT
Page 5 of 6
repair the Civic Center Park walkways in keeping with the original site plans and to maintain
consistency of materials. It was seconded by Ms. Holcomb and unanimously approved (7-0).
III. Receive a report on the O'Neil Ford Ceremony.
Ms. Bays reported that the invitations have been mailed. The Invitations urges anyone that
cannot attend the ceremony on Saturday to attend Friday night at the Center for Visual
Arts. The ceremony on Saturday will begin at 10.00 a.m. Tours will be given for O'Neil
Ford structures from 1,00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. There will ako be a lunch buffet catered by
Fremaux Catering on Saturday.
Mr. Cochran thanked Ms. Bays for hand addressing each invitation.
IV. Receive a report on proposed demolition of the Union Pacific railroad freight terminal.
Mr. Cochran reported that it was brought to his attention, by Jane Biles, that Union Pacific
was planning to demolish the railroad freight terminal located next to the Center for•Visual
Arts. After calling the Union Pacific he found that the person he needed to speak with was
on vacation. He later called Union Pacific back to see about preservation of the terminal.
The Denton Record Chronicle then did an article regarding the terminal. Over the
weekend, Mr. Cochran stated that he received four phone calls from people who wanted to
take the terminal. Two of the responses were from local communities and two from private
individuals. Mr, Cochran felt that the City of Denton should do something to preserve the
building since it was built in 1881.
The Commission agreed that the terminal would need to be moved from Its present location.
Mr. Cochran stated that Union Pacific has agreed to put the demolition on hold until
someone claims the building.
Ms. Biles asked Mr. Cochran to find out how long the structure can stay at its current
location and report back to the Commission on a future agenda. Mr. Cochran agreed.
t
nre,~!a~Io_ ~3 _
Keep Denton Beautiful
Minutes Q
Jul), 12, 1993
Page 2
planning hOUrS.
(I:). Projects would need to he carefully reviewed and not ill grants should receive
the mawimunt match.
(F). The time limit should insure ndeyu;ite time for plants to establish. The Board
should give more to low maintenance projects.
Ais. Carson stated that the S 1000 math by K D.B. does not include water. K,D.B.
and the City cover that separately.
►1r. Watson made the motion to limit the percent of credit for planning hours to no
more than 15% of the total cost of the project. Ms. Gibson seconded and the motion
curried unanimously (0.0).
Air. Watson moved to change the length of time for the Adopt•A-Spot program from.
five (5) ye rs to two (2). Nis. Nelson seconded and the motion carried (5.0). Nis.
Morrison r bstained.
III. Discuss plans for th~_O'Neil Ford Aiunicipnl Complex
Ms. Nelson informed the Board about the possibility of the bricks around the t
Municipal Building being replaced with pavers, The Board held a brief discussion
about the brick sidewalks. Ms Nelson made the motion to recommend that the
bricks be left and maintained maher than replace them with pavers and destroy some
of the aesthetics of the building and surrounding area. Mr. Wntson seconded and the
motion carried unanimously (6-0).
IV, Receive a report on the Keep Teats Beautiful Inc. ual on a et nce,
Ms. Morrison pro-Aed materials from the conference and pictures of the conference
were reviewed.
V. Cons d r setting a time date and place for the an ua r e;id,
The members discussed Saturday versus a business day and decided on a Monday
It was decided to try and hold the retreat on either August 2nd or 9th at the
Women's Building. The Board decided it would be better to have the retreat on one
clay instead of Iwo. Ms. Nelson said she would check on the availability of the
Women's Building,
i
ti
CITY
SCOUNCII
d
"SS e
r ° " t 00~
~~DOQaGGC4~'
r
Agenda No 4.3 - 028_
ORDINANCE NO. AgendalferrL~„S ~QC.~.,.
Dote-8 -3.93
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR EM661`1
PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCORD-'
ANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM
REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, state law and ordinance require that certain contracts
requiring an expenditure or payment by the City in an amount ex-
ceeding $10,000 be by competitive bids, except in the case of pub-
lic calamity where it becomes necessary to act at once to appro-
priate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to pre-
serve the property of the city, or it is necessary to protect the
public health or safety of the citizens of the city, or in case of
unforeseen damage to public property, machinery or equipment; and,
WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended to the City Council
that it is necessary to purchase goods or services due to the fol-
lowing emergency conditions outlined in the memorandum attached
hereto as Exhibit "A", incorporated herein by reference; NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the City Council hereby determines that there
is a public calamity that makes it necessary to act at once to ap-
propriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to
preserve the property of the city, or to protect the public health
of the citizens of the city, or to provide for unforseen damage to
public property, machinery or equipment, and by reason thereof, the
following emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or
services, as described in the "Purchase Orders" attached hereto,
are hereby approved:
PURCHASE
ORDER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT
35879R J. S. EQUIPMENT SERVICE INC. $ 15,000.00
SECTION II. That because of such emergency, the City Manager
or designated employee is hereby authorized to purchase the mater-
ials, equipment, supplies or services as described in the attached
Purchase Orders and to make payment therefore in the amounts there-
in stated, such emergency purchases being in accordance with the
provisions of state law exempting such purchases by the City from
the requirements of competitive bids.
SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective im-
mediately upon its passage and approval.
6~? eV
PASSED AND APPROVED this the
day of
1992.
BOB CA TS LEBERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
I
w
A; No
N
D B SLTtT 33 t 1993
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #35879R - J. S. EQUIPMENT SERVICE INC.
RECOMMENDATION: Council approve payment of emergency Purchase order #3587911
to J. S. Equipment Service Inc. In the amount of $15,000.00.
SUMMARY: This purchase order is for transmission repairs to the small dozer used
by the Drainage Department. Repairs were necessary to get the equipment operating
for use In the Drainage Department's work load.
BACKGROUND: Purchase Order 035879R, Memorandum from Jack Jarvis, Fleet
Superintendent
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Fleet Services, Drainage
Department
FISCAL IMPACT: Funding is avallable in account #710-025-0580-8710 (Sublet Repairs
- Garage) with a current balance of $203,518.59.
Res ally su ted:
L yd V. Harrell
City Manager
Approved:
P)la
ame: Melanie Harden
Title: Buyer
~4~nd~.79B
i
THIS IS A IXXX CONFIRMING ORDER PURCHASE ORDER NO: PC 35879R
(IF MARKED) This invoices number delwomust appear on all
,
DO NOT DUPLICATE tins,boxes, packing slips end bins.
Req No: Bid No:
Date: 7-16-93 Page No Ol
'VENDOR PURCHASING DIVISION i 901 8 TEXAS STREET /DENTON. TEXAS 7620f
NAME/ J. S. EQUIPMENT SERVICE INC. 8 1 7/3837 100 DIFWMETRO81712670042 FAX80713824692
602 WILDLIFE PARKWAY
ADDRESS GRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS 75050 DELIVERY
ADDRESS CONFIRMATION ONLY C14
FLEET SERVICES
804 TEXAS
DENTON, TEXAS 76201
VENDOR N0. JJJ59500 DELIVERY QUOTED 8-15-93 FOB DESTINATION TERMS
01 1.00 EA VENDOR CAT. / N / A MFG NAME $15,000.00 $15,000.00
CITY $ 92935
RIG 1 2735 R 6 R TRANS ON UNIT
an
rn' C;
~i to
' pa
t
01 710 025 0580 8710 15,000.00 GRAND TOTAL $15, 00 00
VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS: 3. Terms - Net 3011h,iess oiherwise spe~i6ed i
1. Send original h its with duprieate copy. 4 Shipping Instructions: F 0 B Destination prepaid IUnless otherwise eoeoardl
2. Bill to - Accounts Payable 5. No federal or state sales tax shall be included
215 E. McKinney St in prices billed.
Denton, TX 76201 Purchasing Dnlsion
Vr Irnnn
I
07-19-93PC4:56 0021
D
C1TY of DENTON, T&"# MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXA57670
1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Denise Har
pool, purchasing
FROM: Jack Jarvis
Fleet Supt.
SUBJECT: Emergency Repair P0035879
DATE: Jul)' 16, 1993
This request is for an emergenc repair
down because of a transmissionyfailure,of Rig 2735, The unit is
small dozer in our Drainage Dept.
soon This unit is the only
as possible, It a must to get it repaired as
Thank you for your help,
V817/566.8100 D/FW METRO 434.2329
V
>YF:'.4 6
F
CITY
MMCOUNCII
1 a•~
po ~
~rC Nt ~ ~oOJ
_u~~~OCGGGCCt~'
Voedi No. 9.5 - 62-1
Agenda?
tam keza-4
Its a - 93
ClTYofDENTON,TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 7620f / TELEPHONE(817) 588-8307
OMG0 of fhe City Manapef
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
FROM. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager
DATE: July 28, 1993
SUBJECT: Airport Runway Extension Contract
Attached is the contract amendment from Freese and Nichols. This
amendment would allow us to begin preliminary engineering work on
the extension to the south. As you and the Council are aware, we
have been working on acquiring the land and have just recently have
acquired two of the large tracts of land that are needed for the
extension. In fact, two meetings ago, the Council approved an
application for reimbursement from the FAA for $150,000. We will
subsequently be filing one more amendment to that grant for an
additional $90000 so that we will be reimbursed for 904 of the land
acquisition so far.
In our dealings on the land, we have also been talking with the FAA
about getting in line for a grant for the extension. The FAA has
always told us that engineering would be crucial for that
extension. I have attached a letter to Mike Nicely outlining the
steps that we would like to follow in beginning this process. You
may recall, we gave this same scenario to the Council at their
recent planning session. In essence, this contract would be part
of that whole process. We have been told that the money we spend
on this preliminary engineering work will be eligible as part of
our 104 match for the extension grant. That along with other in-
kind services such as surveying and testing as well as future
acquisition of the final piece of land on the north would also
count towards that 104.
wn are proposing thr.t this contract amendment be approved by the
Council. As you can see, each phase of the contract has to have
written approval by the city before the engineers can continue. If
you will note on page 7 under Roman Numeral VI, Compensation, there
are two lump sum amounts. The first of these if for phases 3b and
3c which is the preliminary engineering. You will note that the
cost is $37,556. We have reviewed their estimate on costs, and it
appears that they are using standard multipliers for the time
contract with the FAA to make asuirethat they lareaagreeable to this
3
~erdaNo ~ ~ z
Lloyd Harrell,
July 27, 1993
Page 2
costs since they will ultimately be funding 90% of them. By
approving this amendment, we will actually approve the contract for
all of the engineering, i.e. $71,407. However, we will only be
authorizing Phase I or the ;37,556. After the grant is approved,
we would authorize Phase II.
We have over $40,000 in interest money that has accumulated from
the $5000000 C.O. that was issued for airport improvements in 1987.
Staff recommends that the Council approve the contract and allow us
to pursue Phases 3b and 3c. That would allow us to have
preliminary engineering work done sometime this fall which is the
timing that we need to have a good chance of getting the grant for
the extension. Since we have existing funds and since there would
be really no effect on the budget, we think this is a good strategy
in order for us to continue to pursue the extension grant and yet
eliminate most of the effects of this cost. it would also help us
defray our 101 costs when the extension is granted.
If you or the Council has any further questions, I mould be happy
to try and answer them at your convenience.
R ak Svehl " -
Deputy City Manager
RS=bw
AMM00318
Attachments
f : \4DDOL S \DRD\i W .l
3 c~/37
ORDINANCE N0. l/
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NUMBER
THREE TO THE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF DENTON AND FREESE AND
NICHOLS, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR IMPROVE-
MENTS TO THE DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION i That the Mayor is authorized to execute Amendment
Number Three to the Agreement between the City of Denton and Freese
and Nichols, Inc. for professional engineering services for im-
provements to Denton Municipal Airport, a copy of which is attached
hereto.
SECTION II That the City Council hereby authorizes the expen-
diture of funds not to exceed $71,407 in the manner specified in
the Agreement.
SECTION III That this ordinance shall be.ome effective immed-
iately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1993.
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
' I
BY$
u
e
Y
TO THE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NUMBER 3
FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETVIEEN
THE CITY OF DENTON AND FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
FOR AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS
RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY EXTENSION (1000') j
The Agreement for Engineering Services entered into and on the 20th day of December,
1988, by and between the City of Denton (OWNER) and Freese and Nichols, Inc.,
(ENGINEER) shall be amended as set forth herein. The said Agreement is attached,
together with Amendments Number One and Two, and is hereby amended by the addition
of the following wording to Sections III Basic Services; Section VI, Compensation; and
Section VII, Time of Completion. This Amendment describes the additional scope of
services to be performed; (1) Extend the runway and taxiway 1000', (2) Extend the MIRI.
1000', (3) Drainage for runway and taxiway extension, and (4) Replace culvert at south end
of existing runway, and shall read as follows, to wit:
III.B. Easie Service -Study and Report Phase Runway and Taxiway Extension l IM
1. Consult with OWNER: (1) to review the scope of work, (2) to verify the
OWNER'S requirements for the Project, and (3) to review available data.
2. Advise OWNER as to the necessity of OWNER'S providing or obtaining
data or services from others, and assist the OWNER in connection with any
such services.
3. Provide analyses of OWNER'S requirements for the Project, as verified in
Paragraph 1., above, including planning, surveys, site evaluations and
comparative studies of prospective sites and solutions.
4. Coordinate with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) the proposed
runway extension with the existing Runway 17 Localizer. Determine if the
localizer can remain in place or if it must be relocated. If FAA determines
the localizes must be relocated, a preliminary cost to relocate will be
estimated along with Identification of other considerations such as extension
of improvements into the Hickory Creek fioodplain. Two (2) meetings to
determine the feasibility of snaking the runway extension and localizes
relocation will be held with the OWNER and the FAA. If the localizes re-
location is necessary and is determined to be feasible, a revision to the
remaining scope of work defined herein will be required.
w
!4
x
5. Coordinate field surveys to be obtained by the OWNER. Design and/ol .6; , 3~
construction surveys are not a part of the services to be rendered by the
ENGINEER.
6. Provide the OWNER with advice, when requested, with respect to the
making of subsurface investigations, including borings, test pits, soil
resistivity surveys, and other subsurface explorations; however, the making
of such investigations and the interpretations of data and reports by
special consultants are not a part of the services to be rendered by the
ENGINEER and the cost therefore shall be paid by the OWNER.
The ENGINEER shall monitor and review the work of testing
laboratories and inspection bureaus required for the testing or inspection
of materials, witnessed tests, factory testing, etc., for the Projeci, but the
cost of such laboratory tLSt5 or inspection shall be paid by the OWNER.
7. Prepare a Preliminary Engineering Report consisting of but not limited to
a general description of the scope of the project (not including localizer
relocation), schematic layouts, sketches, and conceptual design criteria
with appropriate exhibits to indicate clearly the considerations involved
and up to three (3) alternative solutions available and setting forth
ENGINEER'S findings and recommendations. The report will set forth
the FNGINEER'S opinion of preliminary probable costs for the Project,
including but not limited to the following, which MI! be separately
itemized: (a) construction cost; (b) engineering costs; (c) construction
inspection; and (d) construction testing. Two (2) copies will be furnished
to the OWNER and FAA for review. One (1) review meeting will be
held to review the report for selection of a preferred alternative. The
OWNER shall identify in writing a preferred alternative.
III.C. Fiskn inaty Ding Phac
After written authorization to proceed with the Preliminary Design Phase,
ENGINEER shall:
1. In consultation with the Agent, the FAA, and other interested parties, on
the basis of the accepted Preliminary Engineering Report documents,
refine the general scope, extent, and character of the Project, if necessary,
2
I
2• Attend one (1) meeting at the airport site to review the prelim ary
design.
3• Prepare Preliminary Design documents consisting of final design criteria,
preliminary drawings, outline specifications, and a written description of
the Project. The ENGINEER shall furnish three (3) copies of the
Preliminary Design documents and present them to and review them with
OWNER and FAA.
4• Update the existing Airport Layout Plan (ALP) as necessary to comply
with FAA Advisory Circulars 150/5070-6A, Chapter 9 and 150.5300-13
Appendix 7. Transfer the updated existing ALP to a computer aided
design and drafting (CARD) format. If a new ALP is required, the
ENGINEER will be compensated in accordance with the provisions of
Section VLC Additional Services. The ENGINEER shall furnish the
OWNER with three (3) review copies, and upon approval, one (1)
reproducible mylar, and one (1) set of computer diskettes containing a
CADD copy of the ALP in AutoCadd Release 12 format.
5• Advise OWNER as to whether additional data or services of the types
described in Section IV Additional Services are necessary.
6• Based upon the information contained in the Preliminary Design
documents, submit a revised opinion of total project costs.
7• Update the airport's Exhibit A property map. The ENGINEER shall
submit two (2) copies of the map tj the OWNER/FAA for review and
approval. The approved Exhibit A shall be submitted with the application
for federal assistance.
IILD. Flctal D sign Phaan
After written authorization to proceed with the Final Design Phase,
ENGINEER shall:
1. On the basis of the accepted Preliminary Design documents and the
revised opinion of probable total project costs, prepare for incorporation
In the Contract Documents final drawings to show the general scope,
3
extent and character of the work to be furnished and performed by
Contractor(s) (hereinafter called "Drawings") and Specifications.
2. Provide required technical criteria, written descriptions and design data to
obtain approval of the FAA. Submittals of applications for permits,
obtaining governmental approval for and consulting with appropriate
authorities for approval of permits shall be considered Additional Services
and such services provided by the ENGINEER upon request by the
OWNER.
3. Furnish a revised opinion of probable total project costs based on the final
Drawings and Specifications.
4. Prepare for review and approval by OWNER/FAA (a) contract
agreement forms; (b) general and supplementary provisions; (c) bid
forms; (d) invitations to bid; (e) instructions to bidders; and (f) other
related documents.
5. Furnish for final review three (3) copies of the documents described in
paragraph 4 and of the final Drawings and Specifications and present
them to and review them in one (1) meeting with OWNER/FAA.
6. Make revisions to the Final Design Documents as may be required after
review by the OWNER/FAA.
7. Prepare for review and approval a Construction Management Program as
directed by the OWNER. ENGINEER shall furnish OWNER with four
(4) bound copies of the Program.
8. Make amendments to the Preliminary Engineering Report to reflect any
revisions to project scope, design criteria, Total Project Costs and other
significant items that are incorporated into the Final Design Documents.
ENGINEER shall furnish OWNER three (3) copies of the amended
Preliminary Engineering Report.
111.E Bidding Phase
After written authorization to proceed with the Bidding Phase, ENGINEER
shall:
4
1. Provide OWNER with one (1) original copy of the revised and approved h~~7
Drawings, Specifications and Contract Documents for bidding purposes. ~j
Copies of the Drawings, Specifications, and Contract Documents will be
provided by the OWNER.
2. Advertising for bids will be performed by the OWNER.
3. Conduct one (1) Pre-bid Conference at the airport to discuss the
requirements of the Project with prospective bidders, subcontractors and
suppliers. The ENGINEER shall prepare and distribute minutes of the
Conference to the attendees.
4. Issue addenda as appropriate to interpret, clarify, or expand the Bidding
Documents.
5. Attend one (1) bid opening at the OWNER'S location, prepare bid
tabulation sheets, evaluate bids and recommend bid award. Compile eight
(S) executed copies of the contract for construction, materials, equipment
and services.
6. Consult with and advise the OWNER concerning the acceptability of
substitute materials and equipment proposed by Contractor(s) when
substitution prior to the award of contracts is allowed by the Bidding
Documents.
7. Prepare Application for Federal Assistance and supporting documents
including Exhibit A. Submit one (1) original and six (6) copies of the
signed application and supporting documents to the OWNER.
III.F. Construction Phase
After written authorization to proceed with the Construction Phase,
ENGINEER shall:
1. Conduct one (1) preconstruction conference at the airport with
representatives of the OWNER, the FAA, the contractor(s) and other
interested parties. The ENGINEER shall prepare and distribute a record
of the preconstruction conference to the attendees.
a
2. Necessary field surveys for establishing horizontal and w,ertical controls for
7
the use of the contractor(s) during the performance of the construction
shall be provided by the OWNER.
3. Make six (6) visits to the site at intervals appropriate to the various stages
of construction as ENGINEER deems necessary in order to observe as an
experienced and qualified design professional the progress and quality of
the various aspects of the Contractor(s) work. Based on information
obtained during such visits and on such observations, ENGINEER shall
endeavor to determine in general if such work is proceeding in accordance
with the Contract Documents and ENGINEER shall keep OWNER
informed of the progress of the work. The ENGINEER shall endeavor to
protect the OWNER against defects and deficiencies in the work of the
contractor(s); however, it is understood that the ENGINEER cannot
guarantee the performance of the contractor, not is the ENGINEER
responsible for the actual supervision of the construction operations or for
any safety measures the contractor(s) takes or should take.
4. Preparation of field changes and change orders shall be by the OWNER.
5. Review; (a) samples; (b) catalog data; (c) schedules; (d) shop drawings;
(e) laboratory, shop, and mill tests of materials and equipment; and, other
data submitted as required by the Contract Documents. Such reviews will
be only for conformance with the design concept of the Project and
compliance with the information given in the Contract Documents. The
ENGINEER shall provide one (1) copy of documents with review
comments to the OWNER.
6. Preparation of periodic and final estimates for payments to the
contractor(s) shall be by the OWNER.
7. Conduct, in the company of the OWNER and the FAA, one (1) final
inspection of the Project for conformance with the design concept of the
Project and compliance with the Contract Documents. The ENGINEER
shall prepare and distribute copies of the findings to the OWNER, the
FAA, and the Contractor.
8. The ENGINEER shall not be responsible for a final test and quality
control report documenting the results of all tests performed.
t;
IMF-
III.G Closeout Phase
During the Closeout Phase, ENGINEER shall-
1. Prepare and submit to the OWNER one (1) set of reproducible record
drawings on Mylar and three (3) sets of prints showing those changes
made during the construction process, based on the marked-up prints,
drawings, and other data furnished by contractor(s) to ENGINEER and
which ENGINEER considers significant.
2. Furnish OWNER with three (3) bound copies of all approved catalog
cuts, warranties, maintenance data, parts lists, and names of equipment
and materials suppliers.
3. Conduct one (1) inspection of the Project prior to the expiration of any
warranty period and advise the OWNER of any recommended action to
be taken under the terms of the warranty.
Vl. Compensation, Runway and Ta1iw_u Extension (1000')
Compensation to ENGINEER for the work defined above shall be as follows:
&M Lump Sum
Items 111.13 and III.C $37,556
Items III.D, III.E, III.F and III.G $33.851
Total $71,407
Additional Services shall be based on Attachment A, Schedule of Charges,
if requested by the OWNER.
Any applicable new taxes imposed upon services, expenses, and charges by any
governmental body after the execution of this contract will be added as
necessary to the ENGINEER'S compensation. Progress payments may be
requested by the ENGINEER based on the percent complete. Requests for
progress payments will not be more frequent than monthly.
7
r
VII. Time of Completion, Runway and Taxiway Extension (1000')
Time of completion for the services described above shall be ISO days
(exclusive of review time) after the Notice to Proceed is received by the
ENGINEER from the OWNER.
All other provisions, terms, and conditions of the Agreement for Engineering Services
between the City of Denton and Freese and Nichols, Inc., which are not expressly
amended here, shall remain in full force and effect.
This Amendment 3 is executed in two counterparts, on this the day of
1943.
ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON
OWNER
ATTEST: FREESE AND NICHOIS, INC.
ENGINEER
8
.~i
ATTACHNIENT A
SCHEDULE OF CHARGES
Staff Member Salary Cost Times Multiplier of 2.3
Resident Representative Salary Cost Times Multiplier of 2.0
Salary Cost is defined as the cost of payroll of engineers, draftsmen, stenographers,
surveymen, clerks, laborers, etc., for the time directly chargeable to the project, plus
social security contributions, unemployment compensation insurance, retirement benefits,
medical and insurance benefits, longevity payments, sick leave, vacation and holiday pay
applicable thereto. (Salary Cost is equal to 1.48 times payroll. This factor is adjusted
annually.)
Other Direct Expenses Actual Cost Times Multiplier of 1.15
Other direct expenses shall include outside printing and reproduction expense,
communication expense, travel, transportation and subsistence away from Fort Worth
and other miscellaneous expenses directly related to the work, including costs of
laboratory analysis, test, and other work required to be done by independent persons
other than staff members.
Rates for Inhouse Services
Computer and CAD
PC CAD Stations $10.00 per connect hour
Interpro $12.50 per connect hour
PC Stations $ 8.00 per connect hour
VAX Computer $20.00 per connect hour
Calcomp Plotter S 3.00 per plot
Print Shop
Bluelines $ 0.07 per square foot
Offset and Xerox Copies $ 0.07 per single side copy
Offset and Xerox Copies $ 0.14 per double side copy
GBC Binding (Regular Cover) $ 2.00 per book
GBC Binding (Emboss. Cover) $ 4.00 per book
Tape Binding (Regular Cover) $ 1.75 per book
Tape Binding (Emboss. Cover) $ 3.75 per book
4.22-93
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES -
STATE OF TEXAS ll
COUNTY OF DENTON 0
This Agreement made, entered into and executed this the Dy"~ day
of 19881 by and b.areen City-o" enton,
„
Texas, hereina ter ca ed the UN ER and Freese and Nichols, Inc., herein-
after called the "ENGINEER" acting herein, by and through its representative,
duly authorized so to act for and in behalf of said
ENGINEER.
IIITNESSETH, that in consideration of the covenants and agreements
herein contained, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:
SECTION I
EMPLOYMENT OF ENGINEER
The OWNER agrees to employ the ENGINEEk, and the ENGINEER agrees to perform
professional engineering services in connection with the Project as stated
In the ser agrees to~paynto thfeolENGIlow thevse tionsetoNN-R
follcw.
The Project shall include the following improvements to the Denton
Municipal Airport:
A. SCOPE OF AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS
1. Road Access to South Hangar Area*
2. Infield Drainage Improvements
3. Land Acquisition
North Utility Runway 17R Clear Zone - 13.5 Acres
North Runway 17L Clear Zone - 24.7 Acres
South Runway 35R Clear Zone - 31 Acres
4. North Holding Apron
-1-
S
5. Runway 35-R Extension 1000-Ft. 7)
6. Medium Intensity Runway Lights for Runway 35-R 1000=F~.S' ' ` 3
Extension
7. 'Parallel Taxiway Extension ana Holding Apron
8. Stub Taxiway to Southeast Industrial Area
g. Taxiway Lighting - Medium Intensity
10. Commercial Service Area Paving
11. FBO Paving *
12, Executive Jet Center Aircraft Parking
13. Other assignments as authorized by the C4414ER in writing.
*Improvements ineligible for AIP funding
SECTION II
PERIOD OF SERYICE
This Agreement shall become effective upon execution by the OIlNER and the
ENGINEER and shall continue until the design and construction of the
airport improvements described in Paragraph I and funded by the Federal
Aviation Administration are completed. However, it is ex:ressly understood
and agreed to by the parties that ENGINEER shall riot co.rinence the services
set forth in Paragraph IIB. C. and 0. unless (i) the Federal Aviation
Administration has funded the cost of constructing said improvements and
(ii) written authorization to proceed from OWNER has been delivered to
ENGINEER,.
SECTION III
BASIC StRVICES
The scope of basic services for the Study and Report Phase, Desin Phase
and Construction Phase will be restricted to approved and funded"
improvements whether a Capital Improvement Project or an AIP improvement.
Subsequent funded improvements will receive engineering services when
notification of allocation or funds are received.
The ENGINEER shall render the following professional services for the
development of the Project:
A. DEVELOP PREAPPLICATICN
Prepare preapplIcation for subnittai to the Federal Aviation
Administration for airport improvement and land acquisition
projects eligible to receive Airport Improvement Program Funds. ' l
The projects to be in the application are identified in the Scope
of Airport Improvements, paragraph I.A.
6. STUDY AND REPORT PHASE
After written notice from the OWNER to proceed the ENGINEER shall:
1. Consult with OWNER: (1) to review the scope of work, (2) to
verify the OWNER's requirements for the Project, and (3) to
review available data.
2. Advise OWNER as to the necessity of OWNER's providing or
obtaining data or services from others. and assist the OWNER
in connection with any such services.
3. Provide analyses of OWNER's requirements for the project, as
verified in Section 111, Paragraph 5.1., including
planning, surveys, site evaluations and comparative studies
of prospective sites and solutions.
4. Prepare a Report containing 'schematic layouts, sketches and
conceptual design criteria with appropriate exhibits to
indicate the considerations involved and the alternative
solutions available to OWNER and setting forth ENGINEER's
findings and recommendations with opinions of probable
construction costs for the Project, which includes estimates
of contingencies and allowances for charges of professionals
and consultants" Allowances for the cost of land and
rights-of-way, compensation for or damages to properties and
interest and financing charges will be provided by the Owner
or others so designated by the OWNER, all of which are
hereafter called "Project Costs". The alternate solutions
shall be limited to not more than three.
5" Furnish four copies of the Report to the OWNER. Present and
review the Report with the OWNER.
6. The OWNER will select a preferred alternative for each
airport improvement.
OWNER and ENGINEER agree that the services contemplated to be
performed by the ENGINEER cannot be defined sufficiently at the
time of execution of this Agreement. Such services shalt be
undertaken under the terms of written amendments Wthe Agreement
executed by OWNER and ENGiN.ER. Such amendments shall be approved
by o•dinance of the City Council.
-3-
DESIGN PHASE'S / D
After written authorization, the ENGINEER shall proviae prolesf__--_
sional services in this phase as follows: /i ✓
1. Prepare detailed plans, specifications, contract documents,
designs, and layouts of improvements to be constructed
(surveys '.j be furnished in Additional Services, Section D).
2. Provide the OWNER with advice, when requested, with respect
to the making of all subsurface investigations, including
borings, test pits, soil resistivity surveys, and other sub-
surface explorations; however, the rocking of such investiga-
tions and the interpretations of data and reports by special
consultants are not a part of the services to be rendered by
the ENGINEER, and the cost therefor shall be paid by the
OWNER.
The ENGINEER shall monitor and revied the riork of testing
laboratories and inspection bureaus required for the testing
or inspection of materials, witnessed tests, factory testing,
etc., for the Project, but the cost of such laboratory tests
or inspection shall be paid by the OWNER.
3, Furnish the OWNER, when requested, the engineering data
necessary for applications for routine permits required by
local, state and federal authorities. Preparation of
detailed applications and supporting documents for aovernwer,t
grants or for planning advances will be provided as
Additional Services.
4. Submit plans, specifications, and contract documents to the
applicable federal and state agency(s) for approval, where
required.
5. Furnish such information necessary to utility companies whose
facilities may be affected or services mty be required for
the Project.
b. Prepare revised opinion of probable construction cost, and
bidder's proposal forms (project quantities) of the improve-
ments to be constructed.
7. Furnish the OWNER six (b) sets of copies of plans, specifi-
cations, and bid proposals marked "Preliminary" for approval
by the OWNER. Upon final approval by the OWNER, the ENGBEER
will provide the OWNER forty (40) sets of copies of "Final"
plans. As directed by the OWNER, additional sets of plans,
specifications and bid documents as are necessary in the
receipt of bids for construction and as are required in the
execution of the project, shall be furnished b~v the '1,1;1~J~ D~S
and shall be paid for by the 04NER at actual cost of, - ~ ~ TG A " 11
reproduction. ~
0. CONSTRUCTION
Upon completion of the design services and approval o, "rival" plans
and specifications by the OWNER, the ENGINEER will proceed with
the performance of services in this phase as follows:
1.
bidders the OWNER in securing bids, issuing notice to and notifying construction news publications. The notice to
bidders will be furnished to the OWNER for publication in the
local news media. The cost for publications shall be paid by
the OWNER.
2. Assist the OWNER in the opening, tabulation, and analysis of
the bids received and furnish recommendations on the award of
contracts or the appropriate actions to be taken by the
OWNER.
3. Assist in the preparation of formal contract documents for
construction contracts.
4. Assist in conducting pre-construction conference(s) with the
Contractor(s), review construction schedules prepared by the
Contractor(s), and prepare a proposed estimate of monthly
cash requirements of the project.
5. Make one' visit each month to the site (as distinguished from
the continuous services of a Resident Project Represent-
ative) to observe the progress ail the quality of work and to
attempt to determine in general if the work is proceeding in
accordance with the contract documents. In performing these
services, the ENGINEER will endeavor to protect the OWNER
against defects and deficiencies in the work of Contractors;
the ENGINEER will report any observed defects or deficiencies
immediately to the OWNER; however, it is understood that the
ENGINEER does not guarantee the Contractor's performance nor
is he responsible for supervision of the Contractor's
operation and employees. ENGINEER shall not be responsible
for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures
of construction selected by Contractor or the safety pre-
cautions and programs incident to the work of the Contractor.
ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions
of any person except his o+.n employees and agents at the
Project site or otherwise performing any of the work of the
Project.
-S-
7
G. Consult and advise with the OWNER during constructions, make £ 7 ~C 7)
recommendations to the OWNER regarding materials a4-0-'
manship, and prepare change orders with OuNEf1'% approval.
7. Review samples, catalog data, schedules, shop drawings, labo-
ratory, shop and mill tests of material and equipment and
other data pursuant to the General Conditions of the Con-
Struction Contract.
8. Assist the OWNER in arranging for testing of materials and
laboratory control during construction to be conducted at
the OWNER's expense.
9. Interpret intent of the plans and specifications for the
LINER and Contractor(s). Investigations, analyses, and
studies requested by the Contractor(s) and approved by the
CNNER, for substitutions of equipnent and/or materials or
deviations from the plans and specifications will be
considered an Additional Service.
10. Review and comment on monthly and final estimates for payment
to Contractor(s), pursuant to the General Conditions of the
Construction Contract.
II. Conduct, in company with the OWNER's representative, a final
inspection of the Project for confornance with the design
concept of the Project and general compliance with the con-
tract documents, and review and convent on the certificate
of conpl!tion and the reccmcendation for final payment to the
Contractor(s).
12. revise the construction drawings in accordancee with the in-
formation furnished by construction Contractor(s) reflecting
changes in the Project made during construction. Two sets or
prints of "Record Drawings" shall be provided by the ENGINEER
to the OWNER.
SECTION IV
ADUITIONAI SERVICES
Additional Services to be performed by the ENGINEER, if authorized by the
OWNER, which are not included in the above described basic services, are
described as follows;
A. Field Surveying required for the preparation of designs, drawings
and plans.
B. Field layouts or the furnishing of construction line and grade
surveys.
-E-
6
C. Investigations involving detailed consideration of ~aperat;" -
maintenance and overhead expenses, and the-preparat,(gn ofw,f;atQ
schedules, earnings and expense statements, feasibijfty studies,
appraisals, evaluations, assessment schedules, and 6terfaI-avtits----
or invent,-.- required for certification of force account con- f 3I
stru_tion p_t ormed by the OWNER.
0. Making necessary property, boundary and right-of-way surveys,
preparation of easement and deed descriptions, including title
search and examination of deed records; except there will to no
additional charge for surveying where the ENGINEER can prepare
center-line type descriptions for the procurement of easements
along pipeline routes developed from the design surveys for the
design of pipeline projects; however, additional ser%eys re-
quired to determine property corners and conpiete development of
descriptions for right-of-way easements will be considered an
Additional Service.
E. Prepare Airport Improvement Program application and supporting
documents for government grants, loans, or planning advances and
providing data for detailed applications.
F. Providing shop, mill, field or laboratory inspection of materials
and equipment.
G. Preparing any required Operation and Maintenance Manuals or
conducting operator training and preparing Environmental Inpact
Assessments or Statements.
H. Appearing before-regulatory agencies or courts as an expert wit-
ness in any litigation with third parties or condemnation proceed-
ings arising from the development or construction of the Project,
including the preparation of engineering data and reports for
assistance to the OWNER.
1. Furnishing the services of a Resident Project Representative to
act as the OdNER's on-site representative during the construc-
tfoa phase, if requested by the OWNER. The Resident Project
Representative will act as directed by the ENGINEER in order to
provide more extensive representation at the Project site during
the Construction Phase. The duties and responsibilities and the
limitations on the authority of the Resident Project Representa-
tive and assistants will be determined by separate written
Agreement to be attached as an amendment to this Agreement. At set
forth in Section III, O,S, the EiIGINU R does not guarantee the
Contractor's performance nor is lie responsible for supervision of
the Contractor's operation and employees. If the ENGINEER is
requested to visit the site more frequently than one (11 visit
each month as set forth in Section III, Paragraph 0.5, the
requested visits shall be considered as an AdditionaI Service and
the ENGINEER shall be entitled to additional compensation.
.7-
Through more extensive an-site observations of the vi tn'tpi
gress and field checYs of materials and equipment by 1Lh4 Resident 3.9~
Project Representative and assistants, the ENGINEER shall endeavor
to provide further protection for OWNER against defects and defi- Z
ciencies in the work, but the furnishing of such Resident Project
Representation will not make ENGINEER responsible for construction i
means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures or for safety
precautions or programs or for Contractor's failure to perfonn the
construction trork in accordance with the Contract Documents.
J. Assisting the OWNER in claims disputes with Contractor(s).
Y. Performing investigations, studies and analyses of substitutions
of equipment and/or materials or deviations from the plans and
specifications.
L. Assisting OWNER or Contractor in the defense or prosecution of
litigation in connection with or in addition to those services
contemplated by this Agreement. Such services, if any, shall be
furnished by ENGINEER on a fee basis negotiated by the respective
parties outside of and in addition to this Agreement.
M. Preparing detailed Plans and Specifications for Trench Safety
Systems.
SECTION Y
RESPONSI8ILITIES Of OW141ER
OWNER shall do the following in a timely manner so as not to delay the
services of ENGINEER:
A. Designate in writing a person to act as OWNER's representative
with respect to the services to be rendered under this Agreement.
Such person shall have contract authority to transmit instruc-
tions, receive informat- in, interpret and define D'INER'S policies
and decisions with respect to ENGINEER's services for the Project.
B. Provide all criteria and full information as to OWNER's require-
ments for the Project, including design objectives and con-
straints, space, capacity and performance requirements, flexi-
bility and expandability, and any budgetary limitations; and
furnish copies of all design and construction standards which
OWNER will require to be included in the Drawings and Specifica-
tions.
C. Assist ENGINEER by placing at ENGINEER's disposal all available
information pertinent to the Project including previo"us reports
and any other data relative to design or construction of the
Project.
-8-
t
0. Arrange for access to and make all provisions for ENGINZEk,to
enter upon public and private property as required fOr,ENGINEER to
perform services under this Agreement. --~-~9J
7, / i
E. Examine all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifica-
tions, proposals and other documents presented by E14I4EER, obtain
advice of an attorney, insurance counselor and other consultants
as OWNER deems appropriate for such examination and render in
writing decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so
as not to delay the services of ENGINEER.
F. Furnish approvals and permits from all governmental authorities
having jurisdiction over the Project and such approvals and
consents from others as may be necessary for completion of the
Project.
G. The OWNER shall ~aake or arrange to have made all subsurface
investigations, including but not limited to borings, test pits,
soil resistivity surveys, and other subsurface explorations.
OWNER shall also make or arrange, to have made the inter;retations
of data and reports resulting from such investigations. All costs
associated with such investigations shall be paid by the OWNER.
H. Provide such accounting, independent cost estimating and insur-
ance counseling services as may be required for the Project, such
legal services as OWNER may require or ENGINEER may reasonably
request with regard to legal issues part,ining to the Project
including any that may be raised by Contractor(s), such auditing
service as OWNER may require to 'ascertain how or for wliat purpose
any Contractor has used the raneys paid under the construction
contract, and such inspection services as OWNER may require to
ascertain that Contractor(s) are complying with any law, rule,
regulation, ordinance, code or order applicable to their furnish-
ing and performing the work.
1. The OWNER shall determine, prior to rece;pt of construction bid,
if the ENGINEER is to furnish Resident Project Representative
service so the Bidders can be informed.
J. If OWNER designates a person to represent OWNER at the site who is
not the ENGINEER or ENGINEER's agent or employee, the duties, re-
sponsibllities and limitations of authority of such other person
and the affect thereof on the duties and responsibilities of Engi-
neer and the Resident Project Representative (and any assistants)
will be set forth in an attech+nent that is to be identified,
attached to and made a part of this Agreement before such services
begin.
K. Attend the pre-bid conference, bid opening, pre-construction
conferences, construction progress and other job related meetings
-g-
and substantial completion inspections and final payrrlt;i,ns ec- iS +f~4 72
Lions.
L. Give prompt written notice to ENGINEER whenever OWNER observes or
otherwise becomes aware of any development that affects the scope
or timing of ENGINEER's services, or any defect or nonconformance
of the work of any Contractor.
M. Furnish, cr direct ENGINEER to provide, Additional Services as
stipulated in Section IV of this Agreement or other services as
required,
N. Boar all costs incident to compliance with the requirements of
this Section V.
SECTION YI
COMPENSATION
A. AIP PREAPPLICATION:
Development of the preapplication for airpcrt improvements identi-
fied in Section I.A as eligible for AIP funding will be at
no cost to the OWNER.
B. BASIC SERVICES
When identifiable airport improvements are determined, the OWNER
and ENGINEER will agree upon a lump sum compensation fee for the
work defined in Section III which will be made a part of this
Agreement by means of an amendment executed by the OWNER and
ENGINEER. Any applicable new taxes imposed upon services,
expenses, and charges by any governmental body after the execution
of this contract will be added as necessary to the ENGINE'-ER's
compensation. Progress payments may be requested by the ENGINEER
based on the percent complete. Requests for progress payments
will not be more frequent than monthly.
C. ADOITIONAL SERVICES;
1. For Resident- Representation and Inspection During Construc-
tion and Construction Layout
For the resident representation during construction and
construction layout (Section IV.1), the ENGIN!EP.be
paid based on the Schedule of Charges shown in Attachment A.
Payment for' resident project representation an4 constru:tion
layout shall be due and payable upon submission of statinents
by the ENGINEER. Statements shall not be submitted more
frequently than monthly.
-10-
2. For Other Additional Services
For Additional Services in Section Iv except re'sfdenc~'3"
representation, the ENGINEER shall be paid based on the ~3 37
Schedule of Charges shorn in Attachment A. Paynents for
Additional Services shall be due and payable upon submission
by the ENGINEER. Statements shall not be submitted more
frequently than monthly.
If expenses fails to
expeennses make any payment due ENGINEER for services and
Within thirty days after receipt of ENGINEER's tater>°nt
therefore, the amounts due ENGINEER will be increased at the rate
of 1% per month from said thirtieth day, and in addition, ENGINEER
may, after giving seven days' written notice to OuNEk, suspend
services under this Agreement until ENGINEER has been paid in fu-11
all amounts due for services, expenses and charges,
SECTION Y11
TIME OF MIPLETiON
OWNER and ENGINEER agree that the time of completion cannot be defined at
the flipe of execution of this contract and shall be made a part of this
Agreement by means of an amendment executed by the OWNER and BritEER,
SECTION viii
OPINION CF PRUABLE CONSTRUCTION COST
The ENGINEER will furnish an opinion of probable construction cast of the
work, but does not guarantee the accuracy of such estimates.
Opinions of probable construction cost, financial evaluations, feasibility
studies, economic analyses of alternate solutions and utilitarian con-
siderations of operations and maintenance cost prepared by ENGINEER
hereunder will be made on the basis of ENGINEER's experience and
qualifications and represent ENGINEER's best ,iudgerent as an experienced
and qualified design professional. It is recognized, however, that ENGINEER
does not have control over the cost of labor, material, equipment or
services furnished by others or over market conditions or contractors'
methods of determining their prices, and that any utilitarian evaluation of
any facility to be constru^ted or wor7 to be performed on the basis of the
Report must of necessity be speculative until completion of its detailed
design. Accordingly, ENGINEER does not guarantee that proposals, bids or
actual costs will not vary from opinions, evaluations or studies submitted
by ENGINEER to OWNER hereunder.
.11.
2. For Other Additional Services 3
For Additional Services in Section IV except resident
representation, the ENGINEER shall be paid based on the
Schedule of Charges shorn in Attachment A, Payments for
Additional Ce Statements shall n not be payable submitted submission
more
by the ENGINEER.
frequently than monthly.
if OWNER, fails to make any payment due ENGINEER for services and
expenses within thirty days after receipt of E1iGINEER's statement
therefore, the amounts due ENGINEER will be increased at the rate
seven said
days' written notice to OWNEk, suspendNEEp'
may1$afper ter month giving from
services under this Agreement until ENGINEER has been paid in full
all amounts due for services, expenses and charges,
SECTION VII
TINE OF COMPLETION
OWNER and ENGINEER, agree that the time of completion cannot be defined at
executed shall
by l thee OWmade a NER and a VIGINEER
of an amendment contract
Ag .
the Agreement by execution
SECTION VIII
OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST
cost of try=
accuracy probable f such construction estimates.
The , but ENGINEER does i not furnish guarantee the oinion of
work
Opinions of probable construction cost, financial evaluations, feasibility
studies, ecoromic analyses of alternate solutions and utilitarian con-
of n ENGINEER's prepared
siderations will beoperations
experience i andEEt
made o on the basis maintenance
he
qualifications and represent ENGINEER's best Judgement as an experienced
and qualified design professional. It is recognized, ho~rever, that ENGINEER
does not Have control over the cost of labor, material, equipment or
services furnished by others or over market conditions or contractors'
methods of uetermining their prices, and that any utilitarian evaluation of
any facility to be constructed or work to be performed on the basis o` the
Report must of necessity be speculative until completion of its detailed
design. Ac,:ordingly, ENGINEER does not guarantee that proposals, bids o-
actual costs will not vary from opinions, evaluations or studies submitted
by ENGINEER to OWNER hereunder.
-11-
SECTION IX A~:;.;1;11i S ~iC a
REVISION TO PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 7
The OWNER reserves the right to direct substantial revision of the Plans
and Specifications after app-oval by the OW14ER as OWNER may deem necessary,
but in such event the OWNER shall pay to the ENGINEER just and equitable
compensation for services rendered in making such revisions unless such
revisions are necessary due to ENGINEER': lack of diligence or care.
SECTION X
OBSERVATION AND REVIEW OF 1HE WORK
The ENGINEER will endeavor to protect the OWNER against defects and de-
ficiencies in the work of Contractors, by observation of the work as it
progresses, by interpretation, of the plans, specifications and other
contract documents to and :ith the Contractors, by the disapproval of
defective work as may be observed and the issuance of stop-orders from the
OWNER with respect to defective material and workmanship where they are
observed, and the ENGINEER will exercise due diligence to assist the 0144ER
in requiring that the work be done in accordance with plans and specifi-
cations; but the Contractor will remain independent contractor with
the OWNER, and the ENGINEER does not guarantee the performance of such
construction contracts. As set forth in Section 111, 0.5 and Section 1V.1,
ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the means, methods, techniques,
sequences, or procedures of construction selected by the Contractor, or the
safety precautions and programs incident to the tnork of the Contractor.
Also the ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions o` any
person except his own employees and agents at the project site or otherwise
performing any of the work at the project.
SECTION X1
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
All documents prepared or furnished by ENGINEER (and ENGINEER's independent
associates and consultants) pursuant to this Agreement are instruments a,"
service and ENGINEER shall retain an ownership and property interest here-
in. OWNER may make and retain copies for information and reference; how-
ever, such documents are not intended or represented to be suitable for
reuse by OWNER or others. Any reuse by OWNER without written verification
or adaptation by ENGINEER will be at OWNER's sole rise; and without
liability or legal exposure to ENGINEER, or to ENGINEER's Independent
associates or consultants, and OWNER shall indemnify and hold harmless
ENGINEER and ENGINE-R's independent associates and consultants from all
claims, damages, losses and expenses including attorneys'. fees arising out
of or resulting '.herefrom. Any such verification or adaptation will
entitle ENGINEV, to further compensation at rates to be agreed upon by
OWNER and ENU1 EER.
-12-
a
w ~:nIO._3 Q_
SECTION XI I
i•.; 7,_.,g~r 01"/C? T
INDEMNITY ,
i AGREEf~E
ANT
ENGINEER shall indemnify, and save harmless the O4lNER and its officers,
agents, and employees from the liability of the Ouf;ER on account officers,
injuries or damages received or sustained b any erson r ens or
property, including court casts and reasonable attorneysofeesrincurrred by
the 014NER, proximately caused by the negligent acts or omissions of the
ENGINEER or its officers, agents, or employees in the execution,
operation, or performance of this Agreement.
In the event of liability from suits, actions or claims arising out of or
occasioned by the negligena= of both the ENGINEER and the 011NER, their
agents or employees, in the performance of this Agreement, each party
shall contribute toward the satisfaction
ofpeglig
tionate share, which share shell be equaltotthelperrcenta Its
o
attributable to the party. g neglgence
SECTI04 XIII
ARBITRATION
No arbitration arising out of, or relating to, this Agreement involving
one party to this Agreement may Include the other par
without their approval. .g re.rl?nt
SECTION X1Y
TERMINATION OF CONTRACT
The obligation to provide services under this Agreement may be terminated
by either party upon thirty days' written notice in the event of substan-
tial failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms
thereof through no fault of the terminating party. In th •
termination a event
, ENGINEER will 0. any
be paid for all service
reimbursabl s pro eri render
e expenses incurred p y ed and
addition, all reimbursable expenses hdirectly fattributable todtermination.
SECTION X'/
SUCCESSORS AFIU ASSIGNMENTS
011NER and ENGINEER each are hereby bound and the partners, successcrs,
executors, administrators and legal representatives of OVNER an. ENGINEER
are hereb' bound to the other' party to this Agreement n
essor_ a d t
executors, administrators and legal representatives
s (and~safG~
assigns) of such other party, in respect of all covenants, tyreenents and
ubfigatioas of this Agreement.
-13.
u "
Neither OWNER nor ENGINEER shall assign, sublet 'or transfer a4,;rlghtgl
under or interest in (including, but without limitation, moneys that nay~'~
become due or moneys that are due) this Agreement without the written a~37
consent of the other, except to the extent that any assignment, subletting
or transfer is mandated by law or the effect of this limitation nay be
restricted by law. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any
written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge
the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement. Nothing
contained in this paragraph shall prevent ENGINEER from employing such
independent associates and consultants as ENGINEER may deep appropriate to
assist in the performance of services hereunder.
Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or
benefits in this Agreement to anyone other than OWNER and EINSINEER, and all
duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be
for the sole and exclusive benefit of OWNER and ENGINEER and not for the
benefit of any other party.
This Agreement (consisting of pages 1 to 15 inclusive) constitutes the
entire Agreement between OWNER and ENGINEER and supersedes all prior
written or oral understandings. This Agreement may only be amended,
supplemented, modified or cancelled by a duly executed written instrument.
SECTION kYl
The following Attachments are attached to and nade a part of this Agreement;
Attachr,;ent A Schedule of Charges
This contract is executed in two counterparts.
IN TESTIMONY HEREOF, they have executed this Agreement, the ~D day
of Q ~,rt/~k 1988.
ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON
Owner
By:
~r
U'
ATTEST: FREESE ANO NICHOLS, INC.
Engineer
i
BY:
r
A~~m FOR,ti: -14-
Cri-Y my Of wac , TEm
By.
! . ,u
TACHi4ENT A S/!. U
SCHEDULE OF CHARGES
SPECIAL SERVICES l~
Staff Members Salary Cost Tres Multiplier of 2.3
Resident Representation Salary Cost Times Multiplier of 2.0
Salary Cost is defined as the cost of payroll of engineers, draftsmen,
stenographers, surveymen, clerks, laborers,' etc., for time directly
chargeable to the project, plus social security contributions, unemployment
compensation insurance, retirement benefits, medical and insurance
benefits, longevity payments, sick leave, vacation and holiday pay
applicable thereto. (Salary Cost is equal to 1.41365 times payroll. This
factor is adjusted annually.)
Other Direct Expenses Actual Cost Times Multiplier of 1.15
Other direct expenses shall include printing and reproduction expense,
communication expense, travel, transportation and subsistence away from
Fort Worth and other miscellaneous expenses directly related to the work,
including costs of laboratory analysis, tests, and other work requirad to
be done by independent persons or agents other than staff members.
DENION MUNIC VAL ASP ORT III TW 10% LWENS10N
AAEA,NDMAJNA31IMPACVEMENTI 7
TASKUMHOUR SUMMARY
JUNE 10,1291
"'LABOH••
D[VGNPHASE-- PM PE EE
PC SEN ENO ENGR V V ENOTECH WORDPROC T07AL
PRELIMINARY 16
I. LOCAL12ER fVAL 6 1 1
2 PAVOC i E 1
TUB-TOTAL 1 / 1 0 a to
5600 Hes $456 to lab St 820
PR EL EN OR. REPOR T
1 FIELD SURVEYS I 16 24 4f
2 REPORT A COSTEIT T 76 1 1 6 11
4 REVIEW a OE N70N 4 4 4 17
1 PMJOC 1 4 A 12
MTOTAL a IS so 30 4 lab
1771 $1.100 67900 11410 6106 17516
PREL DESIGN
700
PRELORAWiN05 t4 176 16 142
! PREL SFECFCATIONS 2 IS 1 I 1 N
9 COST EInMAtl I 14 A 1 21
4 REVIEW 6DENTON 1 4 4 1 17
1 PMlOC ! 6 a 4 IS
61.18-TOTAL 1 71 166 N fu 10 781
$271 $2I A 812111 57076 16766 8IV 126707
FINAL DESIGN
I FINAL DCAW14GI 1 e2 12 N 1D6
i SF'EcFICALICNS 4 22 6 14 s4
S REVIEW 0DENTON 4 4 1
4 REVISIONS 1 I 1a 21
1 TESTNOPLAN a 2 i 10
a FM10C 2 4 A 4 14
6818-TOTAL a 14 176 9a 106 2e 101
6271 It, No 60126 $2517 $4967 Sass 670111
TOTAL DESIGN P HA SE $55 746
--80 PHASE-
BIDDING
I ADvERT15Emewr a 4 i 14
! PRE. SO CON F.I 4 4 4 '7
1 BD OPENING 61 DENTON 4 4
A FAA APPLICATION a 2 1
1 REVIEW BIDS 4 4 6
6 PM;OC 4 4
SUBTOTAL 4 20 e 4 4 so
TOTAL 60 PHASE $600 12 024 $64a 1161 6172 WN
- -CONSTRUCTION PHASE - -
' CONSTRUCTION
I DEC DOCUMENTS + 2 7
2 FRE-CONY CCNF 0 DENTON 4 6 6 a 11
9 SITE Virg I IVA) 1 96 6 1 se
4 SHOPOWUEVIEW 4 A
1 OUAUTV OONTROL a I t
"TOTAL r 12 6 14 1 66
ate 11.am 63 ON $1.174 1261 to 437
CLOSEOUT 17
T. RECORODWOS 1 1
1 WARRANTYNSPECTION { 1
SLOTOTAL 1 6 17
$102 {071 stall
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PHASE I7 71 S
Taut PniAR 14. 7 90 413 oe 297 W 178
Tow P10140 Lev Iola 66000 67.774 11176 V3724 SIM NIW
'••M,LSES"•
1"44 EOmn 1%0
C"v'", EOAnA4 late DE LION PHASE
►Nn6n/ EXm4 11 200 LABOR Its 746
ckws,E omal Its EVENSES 6050
CADD E?fNSE $1828 TOTAL 856724
TOTAL E7mEN5E SA ISO
•ADOMNAL SERVICES. SC PHASE
9URVENINO NA SWVW 07 COY 0104nton) LABOR 11798
GEOTECH CONSULTANT NA IBy Cq A DAntonl EIIENSEI TOTAL 14Idso
71
TOTAL so
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
,IBr7R $I F's
EWEN'" s6s0
TOTAL 14115
11,114 P,lOjEcf TOTAL $7140?
r
Z)
AMENDMENT NUMBER I e) f
TO THE AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN l
THE CITY OF DENTON AND FREESE AND 41CHOtS, INC.
FOR AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS
The Agreement for Engineering Services entered into and on the 20th day of
December, 1988, by and between the City of Denton (OWNER) and Freese and
Nichols, Inc., (ENGINEER) shall he amended as set forth hereinunder. The
said Agreement is attached and is hereby amended by the addition of the
following to Sections III.9., 9asic Services - Study and Report Phase;
II1.C., Basic Services - Design Phase; IV,, Additional Services;
Compensation; and VII, Time of Completion. This Amendment describes the
entire scope of services to be performed for the Infield Drainage
Improvements mnly and shall read as follows, to wit:
111.9. Basic Services Study and Report Phase, Infield Drainage
Tmprovemen s:
a. Consult with OWNER: (1) to review the scope of work, (2) to
verify the OWNER's requirements for the Project, and (3) to
review available data.
b. Advise OWNER as to the necessity of OWNER's providing or
obtaining data or services from others, and assist the OWNER in
connection with any such services.
c. Provide analyses of OWNER's requirements for the project, as
verified in Paragraph a., above, including planning, surveys,
site evaluations and comparative studies of prospective sites
and solutions.
d. Investigate up to three alternative designs for infield storm
drain systems for the following areas:
Area 1. The southeast area of the airport consisting of inlets
and pipes intercepting water east of the taxiway and in the
infield area between the rurm ay and taxiway. The discharge is
west of the runway.
Area 2. The inlet and pipe system located entirely un the west
side of the runway.
Area 3. The storm drainage system in the most northerly area
of the airport consisting of two inlets in the infield between
the runway and taxiway. The discharge is east of the taxiway.
Area 4, The mid-section infield drainage system with Inlets
located both south and north of the middle connecting taxiway.
Discharge point is east of the taxiway.
I
I
1
Alternatives will consider possible pipe alit r
compatible with future airport 1 p` 9 is Eo 6e✓~
maintenance and construction costs. Sketchessofealternative
designs shall be developed and presented to the OWNER in a
meeting for consideration and selection of a preferred design
approach. The OWNER shall identify a preferred drainage system
approach.
III.C. Basic Services - Design phase, infield Drainage Improvements-
a. Develop detail plans, specifications, contract documents,
designs and layouts of improvements to be constructed for the
Infield Drainage Improvements. Plans aMe contract documents
will be
prepared so bidding on each individual can be identified. Drainage design will be
will be based system
storm event. City based upon a 5-ear
.ity of Denton drains y
ge stand
utilized where possible arils will be
b. Provide the OWNER with advice, when requested, with respect to
the making of all subsurface investigations, including borings,
test pits, soil resistivity surveys, and other subsurface
explorations; however, the making of such investigations and
the interpretations of data and reports by special consultants
are not a part of the services to be rendered by the ENGINEER,
and the cost therefor shall be paid by the OWNER.
The ENGINEER shall monitor and review the work of testing
laboratories and inspection bureaus required for the testing or
inspection of materials, witnessed tests, factory testing,
etc., for the Project, but the cost of such laboratory tests or
inspection shall be paid by the OWNER.
c. Furnish tha OWNER, when requested, the engineering data
necessary for applications for routine permits required by
kcal, state and federal authorities. Preparation of detailed
applications and supporting documents for government grants or,
for planning advances will be provided as Additional Services.
d, Submit plans, specifications and contract documents for review
by the OWNER and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
Review submittals will be made at the 50, 90 and 100 percent
levels of completion. A review meeting will be held with the
OWNER and FAA at both the 50 and the 90 percent review levels.
Two (7) sets of olans and specifications marked "Preliminary"
will be submitted to the OWNER and FAA at each level of review.
e. Furnish such information necessary to utility companies whose
facilities may be affected or services may be required for the
Project.
f. Prepare opinion of probable construction cost and bidder's
proposal forms (project quantities) of the Infield Drainage
Improvements to be constructed.
g. Upon receipt of final approval in writing from the OWNER, the
ENGINEER will provide the OWNER forty (40) sets of copies of
"FINAL" plans, specifications and bid documents. As directed
by the OWNER, additional sets of plans, specifications and bid
documents as are necessary in the receipt of bids for
construction and as are required in the execution of the
project, shall be furnished by the ENGINEER and shall be paid
for by the OWNER at actual cost of reproduction.
IV. Additional Services, Infield Drainage Improvements-,
Field surveying shall be performed for the preparation of designs,
drawings and nlans. Existing benchmark data located on the airport
shall be used to establish survey control.
Other Additional Services as listed in Section IV of the Prime
Agreement may be requested by the OWNER.
VI. Compensation, Infield Drainage Improvements:
Compensation to ENGINEER for the work defined above shall be as
follows:
Basic Services: A lump sum amount of $24,855.00.
Additional Services: A lump sum amount of $6,420.00.
Other Additional Services, Rased on the Schedule of Charges,
if requested by OWNER: Attachment A of the Prime
agreement.
Any applicable new taxes ioposed upon services, expenses, and
charges by any governmental body after the execution of this
contract will be added as necessary to the ENGINEER's compensation.
Progress payments may be requested by the ENGINEER based on the
percent complete. Requests for progress payments will not be more
frequent than monthly.
VII. Time of Completion, Infield Drainage Imprnvements:
Time of completion for the services described above shall be 90
days (exclusive of review time) after the Notice to Proceed is
received by the ENGINEER from the OWNER.
3.
~ ✓7
All other provisions, terms and conditions of the Agreement for fngineerirrg~'( i
which are
between
Services
remain Freese
in e full n force and Nichols, effect,
shall Denton
amended here, of
not expressly
This . endment No. I is eKecuted in two counterparts, on this the yd day
of _ , *984.~~~(
ATTEST: CITY OF DENT04
OWNER
BY:
ATTEST: FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
ENGINEER
7
RY:
i
4.
v
r .
DEM::!1.iU211,L :PA;RT
r;FMZ DPADaGE Dl?RCVEIMM L~~
i TAWM..,Uaw Stm:*Y
IKYMBER 1,1±'39
SECTM1 III
BAST; SERVICES F:'! PE
P'IC SW RY .;ST DES FZIG SIG 7XH :DORD FFOC TAL
S',IJDY G iEKfT EMS',
CCLI.ECT DATA 3 3
2. SURREY CORD. 4 4
3. SIT:' vISIT/SURVEY 8 8
4. 1'R'TY Cx'VEP'.S:C(t 5 5
5. XUTAGE APFAS 4 4
6. HnRobotlyMrDR1,ULICS 8 8
7. DEV. ALM% 2 12 1 15
3. 'MLY,'SEL. ALT. 4 4 3
:ESI11 PHASE
9. VA FW S; SPECS;'CCbT SST 6 48 1 SS
10. 5)% FEVIE<I :EEI'III4 4 4 8
11. X%P1.A111 /SPECS:'X ESP 6 1,2 12 16 146
12. 5011 ?Env : FF.T m 4 4 8
I3. lOCAPLAHS'SPSCS'COST EST 2 30 20 4 56
14. REV CITY/FAA 01033irS 2 2
15. F21aL:ZE COST. DX. 6 2 10 '
OOIISTRUCPIL'I' FIME
16. ;CORD Mr. AM FEA~CD 1 2 3
11. BID Cfmrj 4 4 8
18. RErrw Bli4 2 2
19. 1EV. CCMIRVCT 7.CL'. 1 i 3
X. ME CWT. CC M0121CE 2 8
:1. ;F]Wi MMSF7r:AT.00 16
SHOP D4G. LMEW 8
.3. !M S+SF9'r0N 6
24. PRC>, WT ! 11AIM-Wr 2 10 4 16
.5. 7JALITY CC mm 2 10 B 20
Total Hours 4 56 316 32 24 432
TOTAL LABOR $22,230.00
ShTSI'SES
Tr m el 930.00
Ca Pv;er Wme $170.00
Print:rq E wE a $1,675.00
Opneral Expense $100.00
CADD Dcpensa S600.00
T:TAL E13e2'SES $2,625.00 TOTAL BASIC SERVIM $24,855,00
!FECAL SERVI(:u
Field Sur,,ey £6,420.04 TQTAL SFDCIAL SERVIas S6,4210.40
2921L 11 T'
3' 3
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT FOR
ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AND
FREESE & NICHOLS
WHEREAS, on December 20, 1988, the Cit of Denton, Texas
('Owner") and Freese & Nichols ("Contractor') entered into an
agreement for the performance of professional engineering, services
for improvements at Denton Municipal Airport; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Aviation Administration has requested
that the Agreement be amended to include certain requirements
relating to access to records and minority business enterprises;
NOW, THEREFORE,
WITNESSETH
ARTICLE I.
Owner and Contractor hereby agree that the certain agreement
executed between the Owner and Contractor on the 20th day of
December 1988, is hereby amended to include the following pro-
visions;
SECTION XVII.
TITLE VI.
During the performance of this contract, the Engineer,
for itself, its assignees and successors in interest
(hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor") agrees as
follows;
1. Comp_l__i__a__ncee with Regulations. The Contractor shall
comply with t-ne Kegul-atiFn-s relative to nondiscri-
mination in federally assisted programs of the De-
partment of Transportation (hereinafter "DOT") Title
49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21, as they may
be amended from time to time, (hereinafter referred
to as the Regulations), which are herein incorporated
by reference and made a part of this contract.
2. Nondiscrimination. The Contractor, with regard to
the work peFrormed by it during the contract, shall
not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, or
national origin in the selection and retention of
subcontractors, including procurements of materials
and leases of equipment. The Contractor shall not
participate either directly or indirectly in the
a
~i
v~
discrimination prohibited by section 21.5 of the
Regulations, including employment practices when the
contract covers a program set forth in appendix 6 of
the Regulations.
3. Solicitations for Subcontractors Incl~udin~Pro-
curements o materials an u went, nI aII OIL-
citations e t er y compet t ve adding or negotia-
tion made by the Contractor for work to be performed
under a subcontract, including procurements of ma-
terials or leases of equipment, each potential sub-
contractor or supplier shall be notified by the
Contractor of the Contractor's obligations under
this contract and the Regulations relative to non-
discrimination on the grounds of race, color, or
national origin.
4. Information and Re or~ts. The Contractor shall pro-
vi ed all informant on and reports required by the
Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto
and shall permit access to its books, records,
accounts, other sources of information, and its
facilities as may be determined by the sponsor or
the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to be
pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regu-
lations, orders, and instructions. Where any in-
formation required of a Contractor is in the exclu-
sive possession of another who fails or refuses to
furnish this information, the Contractor shall so
certify to the sponsor or the FAA, as appropriate,
and shall set forth what efforts it has made to
obtain the information.
5. Sanctions for Noncom liance. In the event of the
ontractor a noncompliance with the nondiscrimi-
nation provisions of this contract, the sponsor
shall impose such contract sanctions as it or the
FAA may determine to be appropriate, including, but
not limited to--
a. Withholding of payments to the Contractor under
the contract until the Contractor complies,
and/or
b. Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the
contract, in whole or in part.
6. Incorporation of Provisions. The Contractor shall
include the provisions of-paragraphs 1 through 5 in
PAGE 2
every subcontract, including procurements of mate-
rials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the
Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto.
The Contractor shall take such action with respect
to any subcontract or procurement as the sponsor or
the FAA may direct as a means of enforcing such
provisions including sanctions for noncompliance.
Provided, however, that in the event a Contractor
becomes involved in, or is threatened with, liti-
gation with a subcontractor or supplier as a result
of such direction, the Contractor may request the
sponsor to enter into such litigation to protect
the interests of the sponsor and, in addition, the
Contractor may request the United States to enter
into such litigation to protect the interests of
the United States,
SECTION XVIII.
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE ASSURANCES
A. Policy. It is the policy of the Department of
rT ansportation (DOT) that disadvantaged business
enterprises as defined in 49 CFR Part 23 shall have
the maximum opportunity to participate in the
performance of contracts financed in whole or in
part with Federal funds under this agreement.
Consequently, the DBE requirements of 49 CFR Part
23 apply to this Agreement.
B. Ob~lis ation. The Contractor agrees to ensure that
disa 3 vanteged business enterprises as defined in 49
CFR Part 23 have the maximum opportunity to partic-
ipate in the performance of contracts and subcon-
tracts financed in whole or in part with Federal
funds provided under this agreement. In this regard
all Contractors shall take all necessary and reasonable
steps in accordance with 49 CFR Part 23 to ensure that dis-
advantaged business enterprises have the maximum opportu-
nity to compete for and perform contracts. Contractor shall
not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national
origin or sex in the award and performance of DOT-assisted
contracts.
SECTION XIX.
ACCESS TO RECORDS
The OWNER, the Federal Aviation Administration, the
Comptroller General of the United States or any of
their duly authorized representatives, shall have
PAGE 3
access to any books, documents, papers and records of
the CONTRACTOR which are directly pertinent to this
PROJECT for the purpose of making audit, examination,
excerpts, and transcriptions.
ARTICLE 11.
In all other respects, the terms and conditions of the Agreement,
as executed by the parties on the 20th day of December, 1988 and
amended by Amendment No. 1 executed on the 2nd day of January,
1990, remain in full force and effect.
Executed this 3A.d day of 1990.
RAY ti ,
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
I!
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
FREESE 6 NICHOLS
I
ti `f~C. `rQ
BY.,
ATTEST:
PAGE 4
i
CITY
COUNCII
L
L
O~or o~
O
t
E
"roN t~ goo
+v
°0~cccccoo~
t
Agenda No, 93 029
Agenda
lterrL~oS'....
Date_.?-
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOF AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL NATURAL GAS SPOT SUPPLIER CONTRACTS
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of June 9, 1993,
recommend approval of the contracts being executed with Taurus
Energy Corporation and Highland Energy Company for natural gas
spot supply.
SUMMARY:
Taurus and Highland have responded to requests for natural gas
spot supply per the "Standard Contract, City of Denton
Utilities". Both firms meet requirements of the City of
Denton, Electric Production Division, and Spot Fuel Purchase
Program for natural gas spot supply.
BACKGROUND:
In May 1992, the City of Denton instituted bidding procedures
for spot purchase of natural gas whereby contracts are
established with gas companies interested in participating in
the City's monthly spot gas purchase program. Contract format
was submitted to the Public Utility Board anJ City Council for
approval along with gas contracts completed with several
potential suppliers,
The Electric Utility currently has contracts for natural gas
spot supply with Enserch, Mobil, Trinity and Tristar. Those
contracts were executed approximately one (1) year ago and
will remain in effect until either party cancels. The
contracts will allow competitive bidding on a monthly basis.
Execution of additional contracts with Taurus and Highland
will extend the competitive opportunities for natural gas spot
supply.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
City of Denton, Electric Production Division, Spot Fuel
Purchase Program.
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
Increased competition for the supply of fuel gas requirements.
Respectfully submitted,
~G «l cG
Lloyd V. Harrell,
City Manager
Prepared by:
Jim Thune, Plant Manager
Approved by:,
R.E. Nelson, Executive Director
Department of Utilities
EXHIBITS: 1. Signed Contract Taurus Corporation
11. Signed Contract Highland Corporation
III. PUB Minutes of 6/9/93
L
t:\uv00cs\0R0~7AURU$.0 ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AP-
PROVING AN INTERRUPTIBLE NATURAL GAS SALES AND PURCHASE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND TAURUS ENERGY CORPORATION FOR THE
PURCHASE OF SPOT MARKET NATURAL GAS; AUTHORIZINJ THE EXPENDITURE OF
FUNDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the city has a need for interruptible natural gas pur-
chases to provide fuel for the Spencer Electrical Generating
Station; and
WHEREAS, the City may realize price savings by purchasing gas
on the spot market; and
WHEREAS, the City has solicited bids for one year contracts
with spot market suppliers of natural gas, in accordance with Chap-
ter 252 of the Local Government Code; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUi:.'IL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. That the City Council authorizes the Mayor to exe-
cute the attached interruptible Natural Gas Sales and Purchsse
Agreement with Taurus Energy corporation providing for the purchase
of spot market natural gas.
SECTION iI. That the expenditure of funds in accordance with
the terms of the Agreement is authorized.
SECTION iii. That this ordinance shall become effective immed-
iately upon its passage and anoroval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1993.
i.
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST;
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECkETARY
Syr
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
i
i
~ y
1 jo
PAGE 18
l
Standard
Contract
Standard Contract
City of Denton utilities
raterruptibls Natural Gas eels And Purchase Coatract Agreement
Date$ MAY 15. 1993
TAURUS ENERGY CORP. (SrT.rrR) a TEXAS Conoratioo
agrees to deliver and sell gas to the City of Denton, Tesas (super) and 57M
agrees to purchase and receive said natural gas froa SELLER pursuant to the terxs
and conditions hereinafter set Lomb.
1. ovzstrzoxe~
The term 'Agrsement' shall mean this ratarruptible natural Gas Salsa and
Purchase Contract iaeludiag Attachment A which is incorporated herein.
The term 'mcath' shall assn a calendar month.
The term xm%u• shall mean one million (1,490,000) british thermal uaita.
The local term distribution a*"aanny e•Lm1hAU an the s"iatelydownstream of the Peaiat of
Delivery,
The term 0 3uyers Notice' shall man the letter agreement a farm Copp of
which is attached hereto as Attachment A, which may be executed by ecru
and SELLER tz= i
mattural gas in
partimi traasaotioaa for the purch"6 and sale SUM
accordance with the terms thereof and this Agreemeat.
The term 'lout Of Delivery shall mean the location of the physical.
delivery to the Receiving Pipeliae,
The initial tars will be one yeas iron the data haseof,~ 664 tsa~Ln ZOAth
thereafter, subject to the right of either partV
coctraet on 30 yes prier written notice to the o P&M.
3. Mlles Alm ph it W com Am tai moz To asuvalf
On a Srzstlt shall T be= specified pansthe b1 7 sdNotices sham qinn httachmaendt A.
Prices shall iaoluda and SELLER shall be nsponsibls for paymsat of all
royalties, production tales, propsrer taxes severaoae taxes, purchaser
taws, and all other taxes and license fees wiicb attach to the gas prior
to delivery hersundar, Prices shall also includs Lad SWAM shall be
responsible for payment of gatheridg and tsamportation charges to the
Point Of Delivery, payaets or other charges thereon applicable before the
title of gas passes to SUM at the Point Of D=livery. lux shall pay
transportation charger on the Aseelviag Mipsline, downstream of the mutt
Of Delivery.
EXHIBIT~..,,.
PAGE 19
4. QVANTITT AND POIXTS Of DILZVIgTi
Gas quantities and points of delivery will be specified on a monthly bass
on the 'Buyers Notice", as shown in Attachment A, at tied by Bum and by
SE=ER. Requests for bids, submission of bids, or preliminary
cor:espcndence will not act as a Buyers Notice and shall sot be the basis
for gas deliveries under this contract. SELLER shall deliver gas
quantities consistent with the quantity, Point Of Delivery, Receiving
Pipeline, and dates as specified in the "Buyers Notice' from the S MA.
S, NEST WORTS P6AFOLXamC91
SELLER will make a best effort to deliver, and BVM best effort to
seceive, the gas quantities as specified in the Buyers Notice. Either
party may at any time curtail or interrupt service with no liability to
either party. The curtailing part? will make diligent efforts to .notify
the other party of the situation within 46 hours,
6. 1NcL USSS IN QUA=ITT AND CX%XGlS TO POLNTS Or DLLSVnts
AMR MAY request increases to qas quantities or changes to paints of
delivery by specifying these requests in a revised "Buyers Notice' to the
SELLER. If accepted by SELLER, SELLER shall make all arrangements needed
to revise deliveries within 24 hours. If S6T.LEit wishes to increase gas
quantities or change points of delivery, be must notify Sum, and receive
a revised Buyers Notice signed by BVTER to do an.
7. 0V=.oSL1Vi11is1
if SELLER provides gas quantities for a month is excess of 4% above ins
quantities is the 'Buyers Notices or at poets of delivery not specified
in the 'Buyers Notice', BUM shall Dan the right to refuse the
quantities of gas and aball be exempt from Lay payments on those gas
quantities. SIILiA shall be liable for any penalties or excess storage or
transportation charges owed by the Ann as a result of the SELLERS
deliveries in excess of 4% o! the Buyers Notice or at locations nos
specified is the 'Buyers Notice'.
6. QU AND PLZCS =2111
All gas quantities and prices a" be in Motu adjusted to 14.650 psi, at
a temperature of 60 degrees rahrenheit, with both Ycf and Btu free of
water vapor (Dry), prices will be in O.S. dollars.
9. QMITT AND rt6{SSM I
The qss delivered by $ZLLLA ahall meet the pressure requirements 4ad
quality specifications of the Aeosiving Pipeline.
10. T2TLJI
9 a,=u warrants for itaelf, its successors, heirs and assigns, title to all
gas delivered and accepted by surn hereuadar, SZLi.1.11 waST&AU /t has the
right and lawful authority to sell the qas and that such qas is free from
liens, encumbrances sad claims of every kind. I LLn shall indemnify and
save BUM barailess from all suits, clLims, liens, damages, costs, losses,
expenses And encumbrances of whatsoever nature Arising out of claims of
Any or all persons to said gas or the title of said gas, 6rr.LU shall be
in control and possession of Lad responsible for any risk of loss,
damage, claim, llabtility or injury caused thereby until the gas has been
delivered to the %Mlt at the Point Of Delivery. Title Lad risk of lass
shall pass at the point Of Delivery from SELLER to SUM,
I
t
F
r.
PAGE 20
11. DrrMIlIRO PAnM1T VOLUM S1
on approxisately the 15th day fcllowirq the end of each month of ;as
del47srLes, SEL:.IR shall furnish Bum a statement specifyingi voi:re
delivered, location, and Receivinq ?Ipeline. if these volumes differ free
B'.Yv-A's independent nanitoriag Of deliveries or Receiving Pipelirs's
records, Bl+'7*_R shall have the right to pay on the undisputed amount either
(i) usdsr protest, or liil upon final agreement being made on the
delivered volumes by BuniI, SELLER and Receivinq Pipeline. SUTER and
SELLER shall have the rigqbt to later revise payment volumes as a result of
additional or revised volumetrle data from the Receiving Pipeline or other
companies associated with the production, sale, storage, or •raasportatLOn
of the gas.
12. PAntM
within 12 days of receipt of the statement, aunR shall make payment
srLLLR for the gas quantities as determined in Paragraph It. pay--sots
statements should be directed to SUM its
city of Denton Utilities
Electric Production Division
1701.A spencer Road
DfntOn, TY 76205
Attar Jim Thune,
Mamager, Electric Productioa
130 RoTITMATS011t
Communications regarding the performance of this contract shall be lirsc.ed
tai
MLER1 SUMS City of Denton Utilities
TAURUS ENERGY CORP. Electric Production Division
LINCOLN PLAZA, LB 32 1701-A Spencer Road
Denton, M 76205
500 N AKARD Attat Jim thuae,
DALLAS, TEXAS 75201 Ager, Electric Production
ATM STEPHEN D. HAYIIOOD, VICE PRESIDENT
14. PiUMM NONZ < MOpt
sul'E1l Will be solely responsible for nomination of gas volumes to the
Receivinq Pipeline, unless SEL= is given specific vritten authorisation
from IM2 to perWa these nominations. SELUM shall be responalble for
all supply essnuraol i9AA nations prior to t rat 0! Deand all others related to the
1s. uc"M 01P W turf m L>tf0AWM001
During the period of actual gas deliveries, MUM and sq= shall sake
for the estimates of zgl*ws at the *silution to others and
deliverpleuato sacIL dar this tagreement current
the monitoring o9 actual gas quantities delivsred, i! Seller is lulnablei00
provsda current estimates of gas activity to owlt3l, 1=jxR saot
plant obtining e veil ep raiorsso or cot pri~!uP0insportarso processing
If. ooV721rm SZMM I
This agreement aball be construed pursuant to the lave of the state of
Texas cad venue for its construction and enforcement shall Lie in the
courts of Denton ccuaty, Texas,
PAGE 21
SC.:EA~ *TAURV E;E&'Y CORP. SUMI
Sys Sys
D. AYIIOOD
Titles VICE PRESIDENT Titles
Datei MAY 15, 1993 Datal
i
I
I
I
.Y
L
M1
44{
I
~~L ~I X17 ~~~~~~Q EXCERPT FROM
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES
June 9, 1993
The following item was consideredi
4. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONTRACT EXECUTION WITH TAURUS ENERGY
CORPORATION AND HIGHLAND ENERGY COMPANY FOR NATURAL GAS SPOT
SUPPLY.
Harder presented this item. After extensive discussion, Giese
made a motion to approve Item 04 as presented by staff. Second
by Coplen. All ayes, no nays, motion carried.
pub excerpt
5/26/93
EXHIBIT.....,.
F
CITY=
TOUNCII
µM K
♦ti
~ r~fti
M
1 .yy~
r
W~
6 A.
~~aQu uu',~
♦ 1 w--
s
z
i~
a a
y • tom:
»
.•i~...raaY~a V
I
} I
dd
i.
k
f
4ganda No
AgegdaltvL_ 85
9210
_L413 191~~-
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM ~`r,
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL NATURAL GAS SPOT SUPPLIER CONTRACTS
RECOMMENDATIONt
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of June 9, 1993,
recommend approval of the contracts being executed with Taurus
Energy Corporation and Highland Energy Company for natural gas
spot supply.
SUMMARY:
Taurus and Highland have responded to requests for natural gas
spot supply per the "Standard Contract, City of Denton
Utilities Both firms meet requirements of thA City of
Denton, Electric Production Division, and Spot Fuel Purchase
Program for natural gas spot supply,
BACXGROUND:
In May 1992, tho City of Denton instituted bidding procedures
for spot purchase of natural gas whereby contracts are
established with gas companies interested in participating in
the City's monthly spot gas purchase program. Contract format
was submitted to the Public Utility Board and City Council for
approval along with gas contracts completed with several
potential suppliers.
The Electric Utility currently has contracts for natural gas
spot supply with Enserch, Mobil, Trinity and Tristar. Those
contracts were executed approximately one (1) year ago and
will remain in effect until either party cancels. The
contracts will allow competitive bidding on a monthly basis.
Execution additional Taurus and Highland
will extend the competitive opportunities for natural gas spot
supply.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
City of Denton, Electric Production Division, Spot Fuel
Purchase Program.
a
Page 2 b'
FISCAL IMPACT:
Increased competition for the supply of fuel gas Lequirements.
Respectfully submitted,
~G' ~t cG
Lloyd v, Harrell,
City Manager
Prepared byi
/li~ iblatl.~ •'Jim Thune, Plant Manager
Approved by:,
R,E. Nelson, Executive Director
Department of Utilities
EXHIBITS: I. Signed Contract Taurus Corporation
Ii. Signed Contract Highland Corporation
III. PUB Minutes of 6/9/93
i
i
E1\6"0C%\0RD\mG4.0 t/ -C~ 4'.,,,•_
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AP-
PROVING AN INTERRUPTIBLE NATURAL GAS SALES AND PURCHASE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND HIGHLAND ENERGY COMPANY FOR THE
PURCHASE OF SPOT MARKET NATURAL GAS; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF
FUNDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has a need for interruptible natural gas pur-
chases to provide fuel for the Spencer Electrical Generating
Station; and
WHEREAS, the City may realize price savings by purchasing gas
on the spot markets and
WHEREAS, the City has solicited bids for one year contracts
with spot market suppliers of natural gas, in accordance with Chap-
ter 252 of the Local Government Code; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the City Council authorizes the Mayor to exe-
cute the attached Interruptible Natural Gas Sales and Purchase
Agreement with Highland Energy Company providing for the purchase
of spot market natural gas.
SECTION 11. That the expenditure of funds in accordance with
the terms of the Agreement is authorized.
SECTION III, That this ordinance shall become effective immed-
iately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1993.
BOB CASTLEBERRY$ MAYOR
ATTEST;
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
I
~I
I
e
f
PAGE IS
Standard
Contract
Standard Contract
City of Denton Utilities
Interruptible Natural Gas Sales And Purcha20 Contract Agreement
Dater Ray -20. 1993
- Highland Enec¢y -Company (s=n) a Texas Corporation
agrees to deliver and 1011 qas to the City of Denton, Texas (Buyer) and e7TLR
agroso to purchase Lad r0coive said natural gas from SELLLg pursuant to the tams
and conditions hereinafter set forth.
1. DlPIfITIO>Tal
The term OAgreament• shall mean this Interruptible Natural Gas sales and
Purchase Contract including Attachment A which is incorporated herein.
The term *month" shall main a calendar month.
The term "MMtu• shall mean one million (1,000,000) britidb tbermal Quits.
The term "Receiving Pipeline" shall mean the iatarstate intrastate, or
local distribution cmVaay immsdiatsly downstream oY the Point of
Delivery.
The which0it attached hereto 4@ to Luhamant A 1iwhich may bye executed by epV=
and S:rtn frost time to ties and which shall bind SUM and sc.L= to
accordan a with transactions the tam thereof purchase
this and dsse of natural gad in
Agrearsat.
The term •Point Of DelivGry• shall mean the location of the physical
delivery to the Receiviaq Pipeline.
2. TUNI
The initial term will be one year fruit the date bersef, and month to month
thereafter, subject to the right of either pasty to terminate this
Contract on 30 dayte prior written notice to the other party,
2. PIIICN AND PAlN 0 OP OOM AND TAiZI MOR 20 MUJVI =t
on a moathl basis, the price to be paid by BUM for gas delivered by the aft Pri~ shall Includdeeiand SU Ln shall 7eto responsibshow le for pa~cttoof
all
royalties, production takes, property taxes aeve=aaoe taxes, purchaser
taxes, and all other taxes and license fees wUOb attach to the gas prior
to delivery hereunder. Prices shall also include mad SC Ln shall be
responsible for payment of gathering and transportation charges to the
Point of Delivery, payments or other charges thereon applicable before the
title of gas passed to 1U"R at the Point Of Delivery, Bvr=R shill pay
transpPortation aharges on the Receiving Pipeline, downstreas of tha Point
Of Delivery.
~
EXHIBIT
a
l
PAGE 19
v'
1. QUAaTITT AND POINTS or DlLivnT,
Gnas qusnteiy•
the ties and ponts of delivery will be specified on a monthly basis
oer■ Noticei, as shown in Attachment A, si ed by BOTER and by bid
f bias rospondencRequest
will a toact asai BuyersaNoticeoand shall of births baa
for gas deliveries under this contract. SELLER shall deliver gas
quantities consistent with the quantity, Point Of Delivery, Receiving
Pipeline, and dates as specified in the 'Buyers Notice' from the BUYER.
S. UST moans PUFOIXANCIs
sELLER will make a beat effort to deliver, and BUM best effort to
receive, the gas quantities as specified in the Buyers Notice. tither
party may at any time curtail or interrupt service with to liability to
either party. The curtailing P"rty will sake diligent efforts to notify
the other party of the situation within 18 hours.
i. INCREASES IN QUANTITY AND CRAaoss TO Pon= or DS3.I11MI
SUTER may request increases to gas quantities or changes in points of
delivery by specifying tfiese requests in a revised 'Buyers Notice' to the
SELLER. If accepted by SELLER, SELLER shall make all arrangeasnts aseded
to revise deliveries within 21 hours. If SELLER wishes to increase gas
quantities or change points of delivarys he snot notify BUM, and receive
■ revised Buyers Notice signed by DO= to do so.
7. OVn-DIMXVillss
If SVJ= provides gas quantities far a 1004th in 6=008 of 11 above the
&n
iathei~Sup ri eNotice*, BUM sha11 pbe" the drightr eo resume fthe
quantities of gas and atoll be aleempt from payments on those was
quantities. SELLU shall be liable for any penal~tes or sense storage or
transportation charges owed by the SUM as a result of the SELLERS
deliveries in unagoo of 0 as the Buyers Notice or at locations rye.
specified in the 'Buyers Notices,
S. QU AND MCI VVITSi
All gas quantities and prices shall be in 'Ise" adjusted to 11.660 psi, at
a teoeperature of 40 dagrses lahsenhait, with both Not and Stu free of
water vapor (Dry), Prices will be in O.S. dollars,
9. am m Am rang SSI
The gas delivered by SZUJM shall Beet the prassure rsquiresleats Lad
quality specifications of the Receiving Pipeline.
10. Tz=1
sE,LER warrants for itself, its successors, hairs and aseigas, title to all
gas delivered and accepted by &US hersunder. 03MM warrants it has the
right and lawful authority to sell the gas and that such qu is free from
liens, oncuxbrances and cl.ilas of every kind. SSE.LiR shall indemnify and
saw SUTER haraless from all suits, claims lieu, damages, costs, losses,
expeness and encumbrances of whatsoever "tun arising out of alaisa of
say or all persons to said gas Or the title of said 9". stldsR shall GIs
in control and pos ession of and responsible for &Ay risk of loss,
damage, claim, liability or injury caused thereby until the gas has been
delivered to the SVYE1t at the point of Delivery. Title and risk of loss
shall page at the point Of Delivery from sELLER to BUYER.
i
PAGE 20
11. D911MI11ING PAMIXT VOLUMSr Y
'r
on approximately the 15th day following the and of each month of gas
ddelivered,eliveries,locSELLEationR,shallReceiving
sadfurnish BITTER a statenfat epfcifyiogo volumqm
pipeline. Sf tLesf vOlumfe differ tram
BVYER's independent monitoring of deliveries or Receiving Pipeline's
records, BVTEA shall have the right to pay on the undisputed amount either
(i) under protest, or (ii) upon final a q made
the
delivered volumes by BVTLA, SaLL.eR and Rec=eiving Pipeline, aLrm and ayment additionallorhrevised volumright later from ethe RReceiving Pipeas a
lineresult
other
companies associated with the production, sale, storage, or transportation
of the gas.
12. PAlImIT
within 12 days of receipt of the statement, sum shall make payt-ont to
9aLLER for the gas quantities as determined in paragraph 11. Payments
statements should be directed to SUM ato
City of Denton Utilities
electric Production Division
1701-4 Spencer Road
Denton, TI 76105
Attar Jim Thune,
Hanger, llnctric Production
13, MIFICATIM
Comemuaications regarding the perforsance of this contract shall be directed
too
SU.Lne Highland Energy Coo BUMI City of Denton Utilities
700 H. Pearl Stn slectrio production Division
RPR Tower 1701-A s ricer Road
Suits 1060, LB +305 AttaDenton, Ti 7use
Dallas, Texas 73201 o Jim Thane,
Attni Jeff L. Singleton llanagsr, Electric Production
14 . P>16MMM awt
BuM will be solely responsible for nomination o! qaa volumes to the
Receiving9 pipeliae,unifss 9224= is given specific written authorization
frog RtT!!R t perform these nomiiations. gZLLn shall be re• nsible for
all necess"T nominations to trans rtare and all otbsrs related to the
supply of natural gas prior to Point Of Delivery.
is. 22CROs or G" 29MATi MOSO MMs
ai~ail& Is t each of cuurrrent eitii+maviieof q"l1 end tl th Rft at j s laof
delivery under this agressaat for the purposes of nomination to others and
the 00 t"ieg of actual yam quantities delivered, If Seller is unable to
provide anrre-t estisatss Of gas activity to DUMP 621:= will assist
swm in obtaining said laformatioa froze pipeline transporters, proce.Isiag
plant operators, well operators, or upstreas suppliers.
oona nm onul I
This agreement shall be construed pursuant to the laws of the State of
Texas and venue for its construction and fnforceMant shall lie in the
courts of Denton County, Texas.
a _ic? f
PAGE 21 Q'-
SEUM HIGHLAND ENERGY COMPANY
a BVZERr
Syr V, J
Syr
~a
W- Earl Crow
Titler Vice President
Title r
Datae r May 20, 1993
Dater
EXCERPT FROM L/
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES
June 9, 1993
The following item was considered:
4. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONTRACT EXECUTION WITH TAURUS ENERGY
CORPORATION AND HIGHLAND ENERGY COMPANY FOR NATURAL GAS SPOT
SUPPLY.
Harder presented this item. After extensive discussion, Giese
made a motion to approve Item $4 as presented by staff. Second
by Coplen. All ayes, no nays, motion carried.
F.
pub excerpt
5/26/93
EXHIBIT
CITY
,.COUNCI]
1
• aF+yfL
I
I
..+..r,+~(1CQ~.L L1IlrV l
` RYA
O
TTT
ee\wPd"s\bdco trm.o
hpendaNo_...~.3.
Ap odaItem.,.. X
Nte 93 "
,
U
ORDINANCE NO. _
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF 'THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF DENTON RELATING TO "ADMINISTRATION" BY REVISING ARTICLE III
ENTITLED BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES BY AMENDING SECTION 2-
61 ENTITLED "REQUIREMENTS GENERALLY": ADDING SECTION 2-65 PROVIDING
FOR A LIMITATION OF TERMS OF OFFICE FOR BOARDS AND COMMISSION; AND
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 93-073 CONCERNING RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE
CITY COUNCIL BY REVISING SECTION 8.3 (d) RELATING TO APPOINTMENTS
AND LENGTH OF SERVICE ON COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS;
PROVIDING FOR A SAVINGS CLAUSES AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
'"HE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the Administration Chapter of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton is hereby amended by revising
Article III thereof by amending Section 2-61 so that hereafter it
shall be and read as follows:
goo. 2-61. Requirements Generally.
Each member of a board or commission, in addition to
qualifications prescribed by federal or state law or
ordinance, shall be a qualified voter of the city.
SECTION II. That the Administration Chapter of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton is hereby amended by revising
Article III thereof by adding section 2.65 so that hereafter it
shall be and read as follows:
Boo, 2-65. Tern of Office.
No board or commission member shall be eligible for
appointment to a BoarA or Commission for more than three
(3) consecutive terms on such board or commission.
fiXq .4Pi..j.jLL That the RulEs of Procedure for the City Council
of Denton, Texas adopted pursuant to Ordinance No. 93-073 are
amended by revising the language of subsection 8.3 (d) of Section
8 entitled "Creation of Committees, Boards and Commissions" so that
hereafter it shall be and read as follows:
8.3 Appointnente:
(d) The number of terms an appointee may serve on
a Board or Commission shall be controlled by
Page 1
i
r
r
the text of section 2-65 entitled "Term of v
Office" of Chapter 2 of the Code of Ordinances
of the City of Denton.
SECTION IVL That the provisions of this ordinance shall govern
and control over any conflicting provision of Chapter 2 of the Code
of ordinances alid ordinance No. 93-073 but all provisions of Chap-
ter 2 and Ordinance No. 93-073 not herein amended, shall continue
in full force and effect.
SECTION V That this ordinance shall become effective Immedi-
ately upon passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
---.1_, 1493. i
I
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
I
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCN, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
Page 2
I
-~1
fi
r
CITY
MCOUNCII
O . ti " rr-
i
o$~
Agenda No__ -028
Agendattem BS V i/
fkte 8 9 -
CITyo1 DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 78201 / TELEPHONE{817) 568-8307
Office of the City Manager
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
DATE: July 22, 1993
SUBJECT: Appointment of Sales Tax Task Force
You are reminded that nominations for the sales Tax Task Force are
to be submitted at the Council meeting of August the 3rd, and the
official appointments will take place on August the 10th. It is
important that we try to keep to this schedule, if at all possible,
so that the time line outlined by the City Council can be followed.
In preparation for your nominations, there are several questions
which probably should be discussed and concluded as follows:
1) Some discussion should occur regarding the residency
requirement for task force members. Our other Boards and
Commissions require that individuals be residents of the
city and discussion should occur whether that same
requirement will apply to the task force members.
2) Hopefully, the Sales Tax Task Force will include a good
cross section from the community. Especially important
should be a diversification of representatives from the
industrial, retail and residential sectors of the
community.
3) Hopefully, individuals appointed to the committee will be
respected and fairly well known within the city. The
City Council and, ultimately the citinens of Denton, will
be asked to accept the judgement of these individuals
regarding this important issue. Therefore, it will be
helpful if individuals with that type of credibility can
be appointed,
'ell 1 I
Mayor and Members of the City Council ~S
July 22, 1993
Page 2
There may be other qualification issues which the Council would
like to discuss, but these are a f w which have come to mind.
L oyd . Harrell City Manager
LVH:bw
AMM00311
I
I
I
I
A.
a'rKel,x,~
air p.u3 ~/s
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566-8307
Office of the City Manager
MEMC3RA1q131UM
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Council Member Harold Perry
DATE: July 29, 1993
SUBJECT: Appointments to the Sales Tax Special Citizens Advisory
Committee
Please accept my nominations of Neil Durrance and Dorothy Damico to
the Special Citizens Advisory Committee which will study a possible
sales tax to reduce property tax.
17
5
of lwpdocs\res\saletax.r l/_a_'C Z ~r
RESOLUTION NO.f?3 A
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AND CREATING A SPECIAL CITIZENS ADVISORY
COMMITTEE TO PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING A POSSIBLE ADDITION-
AL SALES TAX TO REDUCE THE PROPERTY TAX; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
city Governor signed the House Bill
WHEREAS, law, allowing recently, y not included
boundaries 4 of into
transit authority to adopt an additional sales and use tax to
reduce the property tax with the positive Vote of its citizens; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it would be ad-
visable to create a Special Citizens Advisory Committee to study
and provide recommendations regarding a possible additional sales
tax to reduce the property tax; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires that the Special Citizen Ad-
visory Committee make a report regarding the results of its study
and a recommendation for a course of action; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES:
SECTION I. That the City Council shall create and appoint a
Special Citizens Advisory committee to study and make recommenda-
tions to the City Council, regarding a possible additional sales
tax to reduce the property tax. The Special Citizens Advisory Com-
mittee shall utilize the findinys of outside experts to analyze the
economic impact of such a tax on the various economic groups of
Denton citizens. The Commpp~~~it~~tee sh ll submit its report to the
Council no later than _ faJ.t.. / , 1993.
SECTION Ii. That the Special Citizens Advisory committee
shall be composed of _ /S' persons of the community and shall
perform its functions in accordance with the intent of this reso-
lution, as directed by the Co ncil. Furthermore, each member of
the Council will nominate individuals to serve on the
Committee and the Council shall designate the chairperson of the
Committee.
SECTION iIi That this resolution shall become effective imm-
ediately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the4e!..day of , 1993.
BOB CASTLE
BERRY, MAYO
l
l/
Jr r
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
I
BY
APPR VED A TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. rDRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
Page 2
x#
{
4
V
CITY
COUNCIL
i.
Odor at
a w
b
OO~`4 too
Ylo U N t ` OQ~~
~~GGGG4~
xn_
40e"aNR,_ % 028
Q Agenda lterr'L_ 440/2
(~a.'e /
Q ~ UifUUV[/1
DU~1'lR~7U~'N
MAIN STREET
DENTON
100 West Oak, Suite 204
Denton, Texas 7t20I
1817) 566-8529
H K H 0 R A N D U M
11nte; July 22, 199;
TO: Jennifer waiters
FR04: Jane fllles
RE: Downtown Development AdvjSoz,y Board
the Central Business District Association has reappointed Hike
Beiten to serve another term (1993-1995} as their ex-officio member
of the Downtown Development Advisory board,
J Riles
Main Street Manager
i
A; FiLIAT ED IVITH-
National Trust for Historic Preservation National MA n SU;ei Center, Texas Historical Commission,
Texts Main Street Center, Texas Downtown Asso lati, is, Denton Central Business Dist,ict Association
~ ucbc a
ORDINANCE NO. I'o 'JI
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: AMENDING
SECTION 2-75 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON;
PROVIDING FOR THE CHANGES IN THE RESIDENCY REQUIREMENTS OF THE
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD; APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE
BOARD; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSt
SECTION I. That Section 2-75 of the Code of Ordinances of the
City of Denton is hereby amended to be and read as follows:
8006 2-766 DOMntOVA Development Advisory Board.
The Denton Downtown Development Advisory Board is hereby
established. The Board shall consist of eleven 11 members eleven
of whom shall be appointed by the city Council and two (2) 'ex-
officio members to be nominated by the Central Business District
Association and appointed by the City Council. All Members must be
residents of Denton except that one ex-officio member may reside in
Denton County if he maintains or represents a business within the
boundaries of the Central Business District. The ex-officio
members shall not be entitled to vote. Members shall be appointed
to serve two (2) year terms, commencing July 1 of the year
appointed, provided that seven (7) members shall be appointed to
serve each odd-numbered year and six (6) members each even-numbered
year. of the initial members appointed, six members shall be
appointed to serve a term to expire June 30, 1993 and five members
shall be appointed to serve a term to expire June 300 1992.
Members shall serve until their successors are appointed and
qualified. The Board shall elect a chair from among its members
who shall serve for one (1) year or until his successor is elected.
The Board shall serve without pay and shall adopt such rules as may
be necessary for the regulation of its business and affairs.
SECTION 11. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in force
when the provisions of this ordinance become effective which are
inconsistent or in conflict with the terms or provisions contained
in this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of any such
conflict.
SECTION III. That ) &251 . and
are hereby appointed as ex-officio members.
SECTION IV. This ordinance shall become effective immediately
upon its passage and approval.
nn n
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
1991,
808808 CLEBERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY:
APP VED AS TO LEGAL FORD:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY: -~~~~L1L1 _ r
PAGE 2
CITY
COUNCII
T I'll
1.7
off.'` o
o°
r o k t QQVO
°oaacoo .
s
~ertd~ No , Q3 •02 8
ate- R•3.9.3
CJTY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201
MEMORANDUM
DATEi July 28, 1993
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
FROM, John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance
SUBJECTI CERTIFIED AD VALOREM TAX ROLL
The City has received its 1993 Certified Appraisal Roll from the
Denton Central Appraisal District. Total value of the roll, that
currently is not under dispute, is $108591596,269. This is a
$32,125,919 decrease from the 1992 certified roll and is a
$28,146,663 decrease from the preliminary 1993 roll that we
received in May. The effective tax rate for 1993, based on the
1993 certified roll is $.7490 per $100 valuation. The rollback
rate for the City of Denton, based on the new value, is $•8068 per
$100 valuation.
If you need any additional information, please feel free to contact
me.
JFMCOiaf
AFF006DI
8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529
Fr' ~JS J
r-3-93
CITY o/ DENTON, TUAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E, MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201
NEMORANDUM
DATE: July 26, 1993
TO., Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
FROM: Harlan L. Jefferson, Director of Treasury operations
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF EFFECTIVE TAX RATE
Attached please find the "Notice of Effective Tax Rate-" The law
i requires municipalities to submit the notice to the City Council
and publish it in a local newspaper.
The notice contains next yearts effective tax rate, rollback tax
rate, and the notice-and-hearing limit. As you are aware, the
effective tax rate allows the public to evaluate the relationship
between taxes for the current fiscal year and upcoming fiscal year.
This rate will produce the same amount of tax revenue if applied to
the same properties in both years. The rollbac% rate is the
highest tax rate the City can set before taxpayers can start
rollback procedures. The notice-and-hearing limit is the highest
tax rate the City can set before it is required to schedule
hearings to discuss the proposed tax rate and publish notifications
of the hearings.
If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
HJ~a!
Attachment
AFF006AS
8171566-8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529
1993 PROPERTY TAX RATES IN CITY OF DENTON
- This notice conc. r n. 1991 property tax rates for city of Canters. It presents informac,cn
r ,
of out thr se to rata . Last year's tax rate Is the actual rote the taxing unit used to
determinv property taxes last year. This year's effattire tax rate would Lmpoee the sa.Te
tot sl taxes as last year If you compare proportlem taxed in both years. This year's rollback
tax rate in tie highest tax rate the taxing unit can met before taxpayers can start tax
rollback procedures. In each case theme rates are found t/ dividing the total amount of
taxes b/ the tax bap (the total value of taxable property; with ad)ustmacts as required by
state law. The rates are given pat ;100 of property value.
Last year's tae rater
Last year's cps rating times 1 91439,417
Last year's debt taxes i 4,287,112
Last year's total taxes
list year's tax bass f 11,717,949
Last year's total tax rate f 1,970,972,698
! .7IB0/l1D0
rh/s year's sffeetfve tea rate,
Last year's ad)uoted taxes
(after subtracting taxes on lost property( I 13,642,167
• This year's adjusted tam base
(after subtrattlng value of now property( f 11621,192,104
This year's effective tam rate I .74901$100
x 1.03 • Maximum rate unless unit publishes
notices and holds hasrings i ,7714/9100
rh/s year's rollback tax rater
Last year's adjusted operating taxes
(after subtract Ln4Q taxes on lost property( i 9,18$,01S
• This year's adjusted tar base f 1,821,192,104
This year's effective operating rate f •5174/$100
x 1.08 • This yeat's maximum operating rate ; .55661$100
• Thls year's debt rate ! •2502/9100
• This year's rot thick rate $ .9066/9100
SCHEDULE A:
Unencumbered Fund Balances
The following balances will probably be left in the unit's property tax accounts at the and
of the Current fiscal year. These batancas are not encumberal by a corresponding debt
obligation,
Tvto CE Prooerty Tax rind Bolan Ce
Conical rund 1 11519,419
General Debt Service rand f 183,052
SCHEDULE B:
1993 Debt Service
The unit plane to pay the followinq amounts for long-term debts that are secured by property
taxes. These amounts will be paid from property tax revenues for addlt Loral sales tax
revenues, if applicable).
Principal 6 Interest Requirements for
1991-94
Principal interest Other Amounts Total
Olscrletlte of Debt To IS Paid TO Be Paid 12-111-111d Payson
1989 genital Obligation Aofu-Idlrgf1,020,000 1 221,510 p 714.28 $2,042,244.21
1961 General Obligation 175,000 $2,950 714,28 298,664.28
1987 Certificates of Obligation 79,000 7,150 714.78 33,564.2$
1967A Certificates of Obllgat Lon 125,000 31,750 734.28 197,464.26
19$8 General Obligation 175,000 71,186 714,28 247,102.21
lost Genetst Obligation 175,000 302,950 714.20 274,264.26
1989 Certificate@ Of obligation 17,215 7,201 114.29 25,212.29
1989A Certificates of Oblige Lon 115,000 67,025 714.29 242,719.29
1991 Certificates of Obligation 50,650 3,146 714.79 14,110.29
1997 Certificates Of Obligation 134,064 12,661 114.29 167,439.29
1992 General Obligation 75,000 174,610 714.29 250,194.29
1993 certificate of obligation 125,000 227,600 714.29 153,114.29
1993 Canard ob tigation 60,704 21,249 714,29 82,681.29
1093A Cenerat Obligation Asfunding _ 123,429 712.$63 714.29 906.997.29
UJJ6,151 1.764.465 1130,000.00 $3,10_ 09119.0
Total requ!red for 1993 debt service $5,100,136
Amount (!f any) paid from funds listed in Schedule A 447,947
Ixcess Collor, tionI tut year 0
• Total to be paid from taxes in 1991 $4,651,871
• Amount ndded in anticipation that the unit will
collect loci of its taxes in 1992 n
Total Debt Service Levy 14.152.171
This notice contains a summary of actual effective and rollback tea rate calculations, you
Can inspect It copy tf the full calculations at the Office of the City Secretary, 215 I.
Hcxinney, Denton, Texas.
Aame e! person preparing this notion Harlan L, Jefferson
T Ltle, Director of Treasury Operations
Date Prepared, July 28, 199)
C,
t
t
CITY
COUrNCII
moo, c 41
od
p s ~
pO d! J
0
y~
32
r
+pondaNe. 9j-v2 j
Agenda
08
D
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. WKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201
XEMORANDUK
DATE: July 26, 1993
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, city Manager
FROM Harlan L. Jefferson, Director of Treasury Operation s
SUBJECT: COLLECTION RATES FOR 1992-93 AND 1993-94
This is to certify that the anticipated collection rate used for
tax rate calculations is 100% for the 1993-94 fiscal year.
The actual collection rate for fiscal year 1991-92 was ninety-seven
point seventy-one (97.71%) percent. Through June 30th, the actual
collection rate for the 1992-93 fiscal year was ninety-seven (97%)
percent. These rates only include curre:;t taxes. The anticipated
collection rate for the 1993-94 fiscal year also includes
delinquent taxes, rollback taxes, penalties, interest, and +-he
additional penalty under Section 33.01 of the Property Tax Code.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
HJoaf
MOMS
cc$ John F. McOrane, Executive Director of rinance
8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434-2529
Y M
. 1~
Y1
CITY
COUNCII
M
4O : ro ~p
c s
a
Q
d~a 0o N t ~000~
STUM
k
Aasnda No 90 028
AgvdaI S /5•A.
8.3.43
Date
e
ClrY of DENrON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING ! DEN TON, TEXAS 76201 /TELEPHONE (611) 568.8307
Office of the City ti•eraper
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
FROM., Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager
DATE: July 27, 1993
SUBJECT: Latest Recommendations from the 191 Committee
Monday, July 26th, the 191 Committee met to discuss shifting of the
current street bond money to the 193/'94 and 194/95 CIP. They
unanimously voted to recommend to the Council to do this. They
stressed the importance of using the money beneficially, i.e. since
we are all ready paying debt service on it, they thought it was
appropriate to use it, and reissue for Fort Korth Drive at a later
date. They also thought it was important that a number of "safety"
projects were included in those first two years of CIP. Such
things as Payne Drive, Willowood and being able to consider Hickory
Creek and South Bonnie Brae were all important to them.
The formal recommendation is to use the previously sold street
bonds to do the first and second year of the CIP and then reissuing
the bonds for Fort Worth Drive when TXDOT is ready. The staff
would also recommend bringing lists for signals, turn lanes and
street reconstruction to the committee for their formal
recommendation to the Council,
If I can swer any questions, I would be happy to try and do so.
Rl.k Sve
Deputy City Manager
RS:bw
AMM00316
it jCj~7r
' O II II r„
' p Crl ~ I' ~ l
-tv
TJD
{ E,/ SLE 1f X LARGE
L -XT
• - ' NOT 4r1' 5 1N,
6 4
00
i .y tij c. (D x roO' N
AM U
I ^w `nom n S 00- Do W E 127.36 ' \
~j- ~
CLI.
00
rri v
Ln
J _ m r~
ll~ r) - r II
y ~ r j H 3, Y 1
IE
la 1 S/ r f. r-A)
4
ti ~ ~ v u, ,y a ~ r
8L
N '
v nm r„ ,
NN - , p r q n
' S 00' 00' 1 Y E 203.07
_ z-
N 00' 00' 1 t' W_ X Z
F~F
57,00' l_ X S 00' 0V,, 33" E 199.95' 3
r'
w rn U
mI II I ,N Go N •o n
1
P 1 J g r r) R
I Ems} ~ ~ u
x N., { 00
D
r N 1a
<
fTl
r i °i z y
13.1
z a~ ~1
TEA LANE
4 111
Z r~
iT r £A5£d/EN r
/9J p m r• Uoo
316' ~y
FIRE LANE ANO Yr1VTY CASEMENT _ ~
CoL,nel 0 Pope JIB
6VRRMIZ Y ZCW O "C"
I
qq
1
n I ~I nA r
I
,I O
j o I 1' C4 T
o I fD 0
{ r I _•O
I o I r? I ~ ~ -n
-Ti
I
._NORTIi__,~R '
• I 1~ M V
I I u Q
I~ i f I In I "I'~
1 I ~ I ~ 1
f I I I ~ ~ ~ I
r6o
r, v S 00 0101
' .p
~ D
~ 'MS
I ~ N l ~ (D M
CO
V y-~ • / ~mA
l O S
I I~ ° rl
:3 rr
V • ~J /
cr rt o ep~/
~ CAA v
WIWI.
v, reF
>ell
CfJ C.~ , i C~ ) II~ ' fly p
i
n ~~I x co r7; 10 c,
Q U GJ Cn fry X p' v' 0; p
n I` 1' v O
f I. U J r' r r
L4
:3 C) T
(A
w \
~ i (D OD o Z ) J
o fV " V f,r~ :
CJl (D ~!I r~ ~I!
a' 00 (0 r vti kp /
o O ! 10
,A o
j 1.V d /
to
o s W-00' 116E 17111'
(n O A r K N 00' 00' I I' w ?3J.
-1
Z* rrl
CIO
O
- I I
' (D 0 g (D ~ r 00 1 a a' T
C)
(I g n
Ii O N a 3X O~ a~Il$ Z
! O Rl ~P'IC~ (A ~I
w M$ O BLOCKBUSTER
'
ro , III J+f~~,~ ~ ~VIDEO
0 * JI
Q s j~-'J u~
' D O it rV L 24 ' f /RE LANE AND r
3 i e-p' O _ ti a 1 _ ""Lv'.. C
1 ! ~ Q Vj ~ -i ~ ~ (To be ~erncoleJ
00' 21' 1'i'-V-326 25Y
= ~ (O 2*' f"IRS l A&I AND U/~
1 4t
5 00' 21' 14" W -444.42'
0) (00
i
r
f ~ '
' 1
~
~I
~
~I
/
/ ~ j
efe ~
i I
i
1
z ~
o
ti i
~s ~
~,;;t q
~
i
' '
i
a
f
l,. i
i
I
~u ~ -
3
S
1
I
E
6
sao
sao j
I
V.N1074 ~
6'15 ~
5F-7 ZON
ING
POB ING
N
S $058115" E 144.74'
1 EXISTING
HOUSE --IT
606 SOFT.
+ ~ I
1'T LOT 1
T
EXISTING cowrrcoN
GARAGE BL OCK ,
20 III 0 PROPOSED
g
VAR TX T 1 0 419 A CRESS
Np 71
12' ELM
C~ flllq
e I 7 S a
0 Is,
12' NACKBCAAr
ELM
I ~
22' ELM
32' 32'
l HOUSE
616 SOFT.
PROPOSED PROPOSED
DUPL EX DUPL EX
J6.
. N PECAN
. I V
~ 111
• i i6•
O I! ' PECAN
HB_
20'
24' DRIVEWAY
AND FIFE LANE
A.
T I
r
f
E
L ~~~}t►,R4T ~ YI~LIAEE I i
}g7y!$18 RPF I J.S ~ 600 DP
6S6!
I SF-7 ZONING
.1 ZONING
'48'09" E I N 8902412411 E
5010, 72.44
0
LNLSMCL-
f ~m
1 ~ y
f ul5 ~ ,
I
0013 W ARC MOVE I f
IN THIS AREA { III
TO REMAIN 1
NE T !I I
244 32, BOIS O'ARC .4 .-1
ml }
PROPOSED =I '
DUPL EX f
rl ,
m ~
N h
O I ~ p
re+.in yin ail'1 ~•ul N~
S
t
v
t1
i
1
i
1
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
Q 5 10 20 30 40 50 75 -x.00
i
0 5 10 15 20
GRAPHIC SCALE IN METERS
t
r
it I
°
F I E L D NCI T E S
~ All dint crrtnln 1,419 Acre tract or percnl of laml situated In the D.B.B. and
palentod to John R. Itenry, Assignee of scrip Number 111,
t! AI,W I act tlwnl,or 165, being all of a tract conveyed to Arlene Le 11ore, C. R.
NI.thectun, W.A. Drot.hprtun, and L.B. Brotherton from 1'.1'. Fields by deed dated 5
pisrh 1'170 and rocurded III volume 119, page 54 of the Deed Records of Denton County,
luxaar bolmJ part of a tract conveyed to John C. Johnson by deed dated 1 May 1992
11111 recurdc-1 lu Volumn 3226, page 0081 Real Property Recordel being part of a tract
c.•uvoyrt to John C. Johnson by dead dated 5 Hay 1992 and recorded in Volume 3226,
! p Jr• 0091 Foal Property necordsl and being part of a tract conveyed to John C.
hi,eon by deed dated 13 November 1992 and recorded in Volume 3392, page 0105 Real
It i.lity It+corda, salrl 1.419 acre tract belnq more particularly described as
hrCI'll 1 N!1 at n set half-Inch rebar for the nocthwsat corner of the
heroin drrcribrd tract, from which the northwnst corner of said John C.
JnLuncn t.rnct (343)lUJ7r PrFtj t,narit tlorth 89 degrees 59 rlnutes 15
recopd.n Went a ]Letanca of 7,85 foot, said point of beglnulnq Aldo being
lw,rrity-flvc foot rant of tho centerline of the exleting payrment of
Ft„mn Strout, an-I in tho ocrupled deoth line of it tract conveyed to V.tl,
Mo•llrldi' by JcaJ rgcordi'1 !it Volume 676, p179 107 ['Fl"1,h I1nr C,it li FI9 <I rgioos 5A minutrn 15
. , , 1.41,;-I I.-f e,a I~~m! .,n..-h+l. Itnli rrbn t'
f 204.. 11+411 I1•r..-,... pu n.y • a.. .o-. a,.. . r.. ,.a re.
"Iris W
f1F'f NYQR N1 ~ I O~
' SAN, 9fNfR I NN
1
;a
' i
ti} c,
1 i I NN
L E G E N D I
B-B - Back to Back I III
B/C - Back of Curb
BL - Building Line
CE - Commun, Easmt.
DE - Drainage Essmt.
DR - Deed Records
FCP - Fence Corner Post
FH - Fire Hydrant
FIP - Found 1/2' Reber
FNC - Fence
FND - Found
LP - Light Pole
MH - Manhole OWNER / DE V
MON - Monument
PO - Page
PP - Power Pole JOHN C, JOHNS
PR - Plat Records P.O. 90X ISO
ROW - Right-of-way DENTON, TEXAS
RPR - Real Prop. Records
SIP - Set 1/2" Reber
T/C - Top of Curb
UE - Utility Easmt.
UG - Underground
VOL - Volume
- Center Line
-f- - Electric Line
-e- - Fence Line
-4- - Telephone line
4
a
i
9,
HACKS AY
O l'_'1 C-] C~_7 C-~ C
12• NB 12, MULBERRY
B• HACKBEi
PROPPOSED E`~ TO BE RENO
EXfBrtNO NOOSE 7• PECAN PROPOSE
B20 SO F1, OUPL£A
13.8' 4YERA41 BL
FRONT YARO LINE 32' 32'
fXIJ11NC 8' JAN, JfNf9 PROPOSED SIOEkALK:: -~T
{ U L A N
SF-7 TONING T , U
616
r! _
/AW
CAA1W
r
PAIN \ff
Yf V
EFA,
AJWMA
,'3 SIT IKAAO
6 1 X r NCXtNvCr 6, 71
,r;~l 20
MrcXar
X~. 1
t
1,05
5L OCA UON MAP ',6
`'s
rw
0 H HAA ti W HA[KBERRr I
15 0 - ¢ ¢
p TO BE REMOVED ❑ LL WDODEN MALL k
PROPOSED DUPLEX SCREENING u
12' HACKBERRY ` _DUMPSTER I
TO BE REMOVED SfACET YARD LINE PAD
JD' AYCAALf of 891 Sj D' ARC 61 8
'x25' VISIBILITY TRIANGLE DA' Mll/ur 25'x25.' }
- VISIBILITY
TRIANGLE
I
'r
r25' FROM E,117/tA0
CENTER OF PAVEMENT O+IV[
~;IHC Q' SAN, 9EN£A
T R~E.E -T_._._._._._._-_._._€Xr~„!w_s'.RAIER
SF-7 Z ONMG
APR
NG LOT COVERAGE 7,400 / 61,814.5 11.9713 X
12#200 / 61P814,5 - 0.1974 FL OODPLAIN INFORMATION
NO PRAT OF THIS TRACT APPEARS TO BE MI7HI1
AN AREA DESIGNATED AS A FLOOD HAZARD AREJ
ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL FLOOD 1NSURANC
SQUARE FEET IN FRONT YARD PROGRAM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR THE
CITY OF DENTON, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS
COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER 480194-00050,
SQUARE FEET IN EXISTING DATED AUGUST 4, 1987.
POR THIS FLOOD STATEMENT DOES NOT I Y
CHES AND MR oa EERT Fr
SIDEWALK SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO IMP I AM LY OR CERTIFY THAI
PPOPEAIY ANO/Oq STAUC111TE5 SHcwM HEREON, OA
STgUCTLIRES EPECTED AT ANY TIME AFTER THE DATE OF
SURVEY, MILL BE FREE OF FLOODING OR FLOOD DAMAGE.
SQUARE FEET IN PROPOSED 6REATES FLOODS CAN OR MAY OCCUR AND FLOOD HE,WI
DRIVEWAYS MAY BE INCAEASED OR DECREASED BY Mµ-11ADE OR
NATURAL UCTS OF GODI CAUSES,
SQUARE FEET REMAINING FOR
LANDSCAPING 181,34x1
I
a
k
f r tr lrrr ?'i „`.r1ly,tl n„~it1FOat nrret, ,,9°e Ie1e3 1. lie s,eLUI. VI t
,t In:epr, tr,r,, c f n t t 'I' I conveyed Ln It. t'. IP,tt knar It I deed recorded ...k
.n 4olumc 191,1, 1,17e 6i6 IIPft, q
f
'ilinuco wick fist kl,ardt'n aovth line, VOL th 89 cloy roes 4P minatns 09
no an In .alit a dletanco of 75,10 feet to a found one-half Inch rebar for
0urktiardt's 00eul1ied eouthcast corner, same bsilo-g the occupied southwest
c'f a tract convoyed to J. T. Wallace by deed recorded In Volume
Lltl, yvye ti00 UPI
'1Yie1Icu with kallace'n uccupiod nouth llno, North 89 degrees 24 minutes
3'1 neconilq Eant a di9tanco of 72,44 feet to a set half-inch rebar for
the nottheaat cvrncr cf the here'.ti described tract!
1l1'1'u.t South 00 deyreoa 02 minutes 47 aecondn Host with the east lines
of nuid Johnrno (!431/0.177) and (3226/0087) tracte, p,tsslag at 176,43
tr,tt tLe ucrupiud southeast cornnr of said Johnenn (3226/00871 tract,
n,vno beirrl t.ho occupied northoant corner of said l.o Flare tract, and
CJ'A iuuin-) with the o49t line of paid Le Fiore tract a total distertce of
211.54 feet to a net half-Inch rebar in the north line of Viand Street
ao dedicated to the city of Denton by doud recurded in Voluwne 776, page
963 Ultl
Therxe South B7 duyrnoa 53 minutee 41 secowlin Went with the north line
of Ulnii.l Stzcot a distance of 293,61 feet to s set hair-Inch rebar, said
rebar being Irorth 69 degrees 53 minutes 41 seconds Cast 6.51 feet from
the nnuthweat cornor of said Johnson (3226/0091) tract, also being 25
feel cant of the conterlina of thin existing pavement of Frame Streetf
Thence Vorth 00 degrees 24 minutes 29 seconds East, twenty five feet
cart of and parallel to tiro conterl Ina of the exlsting pavement of rrama
St[eot, a rliritance of 211,15 feet to tho point of Boginning, contaln:ng
in all 1.419 acrcn of land.
'Ihe untornlyno-l ,loco heroby cottlfy that the plat hereon Is based on an
actual purvey Wade on the ground Apr1I 1993, and that It is a true,
currout, and a-curate roprenenitetinn of the property an surveyed; that
tLere rrr m.) visible and apparent oasementa except as Shown oil said
I'Iat7 brat the (114a1nit.y of land therein lies been accurately calculatedl
nod that nail property has aPCena to a public roadway unless otherwise
Hotel.
Ernest+Hr"If~cot h
Texas PegiII ed Professional Uate
Land Surveyor rurrd•er 2801
RECE E~
-I JUN 08 1993
PANNIDEPAATMENT .,T
METROPLEX ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING
501 SOUTH CARROLL BOULEVARD SUITE 0 MENTION, TEXAS 76201
1817)387-1415 DALLAS 219-7948 FORT WORTH 329-3834
f DETAILED PLAN
JOHN Ce JOHNSON ADDITION N0. 2
LOT 1 BLOCK A j
CITY OF DENTON, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS
❑MWN: A+AL F SCALE GATE JOB M.
afCXED: _.C is s 20 t 07 JUN 93 93-004
a
v
2 c~r~rf !J
U
n~ A8ccr~~ o
rNp,~~~i P,nr,~ ~ I •
s~8n,,,s,o~~ 1
csa B D ~ ~ ~ ~ _ oIX
f(i 261 ;[AV'
0-- . - - - m rp z
s
w~ N I OAS. W 139.80'
i..~.'...... n
~XI TING 8'
A COM EASM'T G.
Q 0 in z T
\ x
i d p A MN-A ~ f Wl
e
Q z
z Co U N ern 0
CO El
~ w
U w cri 1 ~D~ w V
to { o t
rM
I~INN b 6` ! v~ x~Z
S 01 19'48 EE 139.81'
30
to 22
71 N m
O m0
a
1
j a n Pik CJNr+E Z Ot- y N Nto
H cTNH O tlNH n ORJ yn yR a ~R nt11
t+ O O O O n " • 0 ti tL O m N N m m n r M D^ ro a m D a a n 7 H
r ] n 0 a M A r~ - r. g r• . m ry r x ON A d r n m 8 Y
N n n rt Ln an D Z N< Z' a 0 Unr70 H
O r O ~y rr - 0 r 0 a n I m o a m a n O A N n to ro r+ v0 E O tq
• d 7 p y 10 m 0 tq r tq r M 0 - d•• 0 r Al E
roc- a4M a'- 0ton rr0 aR n r~ A *0 a00 O
'q n or
N G W n Z R 5 0 W D n N O r* Z rt Do a d R 0 ro 0 mo
n rtNID Nro ro O Nryto A ~O O¢~ Rcc E,0 G1 d~,. 7r.'r,~•C N noH~q
m Onr't Hro ~q O~~"~ ~0r~ O~r~ R5 ~a'•~ N tTn O'O pA00 C Od}i
n roND!"Nyo~ "~kD na D N n b. ri 1.0 o O S p,O Rr a rCRa0,
xronQc to W. 0 A M ; r' AOAO ~N~roA r R
p t. R r o F A a n
•o O IN 7e 3 En A. a s N N
rD nZ a0m O~ NN0 n0N 00" d o ",rtNn
0 0 W w m M M n rt 0 :w c
A • O O n
tt~~ 0 M. A a O rt r N n
n n Q. 0 n ro 7 n n
Nnnv+ A2 E
NAK` bn{yy N- C E Aatq eb 4 ED Arn NaAI
A Ra
or yW0 t4 aW MNIb ro bW 5 M0 N DO A".LV
x ~o 0 ,p to n r -A D. N a tv a rr ` n r O D C flf
p
n lr D Ra Z y. n WN R• "N wC v DD A o.
A M 0. co co
Ory:m HNAZ a0 Apa "o C Wa a00 Ca nRR NfEOx y
p p " 0 m n 0 n R r,a c r%n 0 W rta n
n D m k ro 7 M .l a, r1 A A O+ J rt a s n ri %
.1 ~H}
n d a G it A ro r "'0 A O r o" ~pn a
A tq •rO tyH 7 n n A. CL n n M• Nn M k J'*.pA ~.ln w
rr O E ~N •O ~m~qq 0 R• X c w r '.a t A fP W o a n ~O rr o n r p,~
N y RN W. M E O 1+' R x A co rvn
~ "Rd
A tya m R 7 "-n r y M i n A A A O O O
m PC
04 aC toNCq A0 K7nn r.Rn I0 ,M%A0:nAbr al
10n
O y +~y
A~ t0 H,0pNp (pro y7 08 ~a3gO. 0< n C6V nOnn7D tl
a m M 0, n n R N A oo O a A W. a O n N n
0 -V
' N A n a` era E3
N a• rt tv Q o q M° Sao M
Cnb000.n CO r.rCiO Oar R 0 R MnnRA OGO~ K
~9a 5 •9 DC G Nn to 5, 0nR N LpM
n r a H % rp a tA' ko ~nr ~ A M O v ~ ro -H 0 A a rt m m
N n ~'L ► G t o g ~1 O n N n ty I.,
Y' ►1
n no
MOdtga n0 auto pre %a or M ul " NnMdp~G0 :1 O.:a x
A A A n r1 n m 0
i" 0 RNR. N R N A R n p,mA a na
to ~r Aa A rr W.
n7p~?CC fiH O
Dn n5 pppA 00 ~Rc
ro r O A p 5 a a d e M O r, M n d o C 9ka R,~ M; y
M CK yC. nrM A 07 0 0 n N nRU~'f~w
„o YA q A~ o mN aa'* o^4~aa yro
rl 0 to W.
rµ0 mN ~Nr. ~pa7 Arl+a' Rrar o, on HtAr~
ty ro r~+'< ~pyp++ ~ee n D o n r ~pa+ 8 ~pa+ o ►G. ~Oa+ A pC a y'0 p4~ ~
(T w 110
d0N A d .L D M6rr Art ti 5 rt A'i r¢T 0 •J A
{
z'
I ,
i
f i
i
PROJECT LOCATION
: _ t•
M 10
. un.cc ~J.
,1 l Ml ,v
7*17
E
At a4 p
u r S / 4
1s ni. spppt
aft
i yh . x' c
i
i
i
Oda SS g~ io
056
a 3 3° cr O S 1 r
oe° i ~
z 0 i g o o l o
o M
z p- M. a
° m o o
0 0
oi'°~~ o
o
ro b b p° M O
~ ~ ~i C« p ° a 6 O ~1•
w A ° V~
-o b
§ s a n3
3 i ° ~
o _ 0e r
CL 0o,c i 0, n
4 0
[ n Q to n
• i a o I~ri v
CL a
b> 3 r v• a•
'rn°v ° 0 r'~a H
L4 w
° o
z N ( o o _ ni
r° 0 3? M~ o
r N 2 r
Z x • ~g a n; ~
> ' r C
• 0 3 n
~ to
i 1 0 .n o a v' w o C
<
som O G
y 3 0 N
14 ,tcr
O S e a W T v
1 HOC v• • . e 3A 0
er 'e i e
r ~
co
r~ 0
m 0 a
Z o ~
10
r o z w-~
~ m On00 .j C)0
Z--qo oo
::E C -q Do~
oODD=r(n~
a ~1 Z
C
N ~~V: m
m .:{Z~ZrriIVDO~
o > Z.• --i< rrl OV)X
ao p w -I m
w co ~zM Z-{~{DnZ.cm
r X w
w -4 cn
comcn D D ICJ
h) x
>z (n ~ N m
Scho
m V
.4 Z
(o w
6 ~ ~ D
f
r
O l:'rr2~ rO W O
_ •~a r; r6 ~F~
At
1 I
9'45* W 1 39,80. {p JP5
- f,8' COMM. i Q}
G) m m
0
1 o M N A
00 LA 0
Ln N
D W m 1........ a o
Ts.
i o!
w
D rn
S 01 19'48' E 139.81•
D
. I p p i rA
D o0
d N ADS
rr~~F 1 N m rn
W -I Q I
m
R vCSNrt x z orH H NA1
C a O O ft o n ..H tT N H O d N H r+ C tr1 H n o' s rr f)
a M A n r, O 1-+ ~8q7 rD 1J ~L M n Do 0 m IHD ~ d ~D R SS o y Imll ry O C ,q n m` ~n z d rt to 7 N<,
X n X IG d H Ll r9 C 'Jr 14 O a n r O O
►1
b np~0 H 0l0 r°n d0a 091 fA rlLot O R
or ac,m a pan nrta ~r+ 0' Z a"Or wIc
n ~ y b~N ►~c r) l~Vt ~Z rt V 0
r? rt FN r0 0 z nt, 0 drt M'j d,O ry Grp
a B r. R tQ" r' (+tl A H O N r• no
pp O O a'6 d a n N n •a
7r f?
ry C 0 pp "+0 0 O n ~0 wr+~ n 5 Ny°D m c a rD A O n N C%
$ h y
~t•+. >9 MN" 7 d O C ~ Nw ~ N any ~ O 0 < O ~y
n A 0 O tf 0' , F, W ~p n N rt 0 ~O n d p n 0-1 0
a D, 0 rt n Or M y
0 b MA 0 M r n n 7 C b'S Vi
'd 0 Se:ro a x
Pt C op
4 0 in Do
M MR~ nay' OO i ~ NIA rt..
~onwto It d
nn »E C lb r)am dAM nt0 M 0L<< tiR
~-+n Ny fC
dry b a y 0. 0 M 0 a O m
o R Pi
A "RIwo dW M~-d 0CL rM'p M`<p D' AN QMynylo
M nX v+7Z ;D 0Am nwko C6 6h d rn+• rtwbD
(D 7 f • O tq a Co " W rt A 41 r. < r. r 0 ry d O ~fNl
o tz 'A M yr p, 0 0 0o M W d r- M n ro rD 7 p
D ►pp~pNpN r. ooa Mpr Q a 00 p a RnnAfAO~ N
' ND'L78,z OD rfM nan to nOn rkRC ~-ka fD 0 m r, A
M M P% 0 D
n d y R! a 0 D 0 A r a, p rD p li n 6 d O r. , LC 7qQ
fD d~ A~ n n Nn M dO~n '7
n O yy (~y ~p [[qq n= n N G' 3 fD ui C a. O O• a A N v a f. b
N H~rtN O~.. w It n nw " n . y.0 nAwrG tr
~rt~ n r..MM nr.,n [ M ^ R N Vc A ~O •
.tr 7 d7ry Nn 7 N "'A O O ry r w 0 H
N n~ O" n d t~dr
O• yy N 0 A n n " 7 0 ,a. or n r% r..60
~~yVq+i 'U ID n n$ Q' N rt p. n M N 7 , a r 'Z
m d' rt iMi• .i n rot A O 'g a K d "v n R7 n O H n n
.7 to d n O d 49
" M N b
M
0
f :ptvC, o~ r'+wc Mn n^'~0m0 ~
m 0 m 5' 19 0 Or t c O n N O n n c 7 M A
r~ ►+Nm ,p 7~ Ctc n a~ dnfl. = Y
r a ta,.. nom Mo 0 7Ic °N = xn C, J a M
r~0 dt~VWA ~ Awn OM '°Yn m0 to nMnpdc
? nm~Y 4
,
rg 14 fl K" " ~O N .°0y n ny 11
m j r) a Z M G O 0✓ A O N Do 0 M n
nrt n ? p 7 0 M5 b Y ✓N m
i Ar'O ~C do n0 n ✓•rb OC COrt0m
O o ro d Y
E ,0 .c n d d . n w ~~pp°1 j c O
+pr*0 or :7 mHnd 00 n rt m~ H dM •M 7~OOHSOm
n
00 b00N•g n n n N tc dm rf nN 0 C) r n A, rt n
m(D nroy n at ryvo 0 nn~ ~rer o, OrD~A
rr po d O m d pry c c A n
{ b,~ O 7 n O nt Ai 70:0 K 4
i! m0 <D b O O HO n 0 m 00 50 `CO+,4p 0a trm
SL MffiA d %0d Mdn rrfe n O,n 60 C6 % . . hO 04
yy f
►1 K '0 m 'G H v O A A n to
O A 0 B t7 X'7 p O O k
to +9 d t
7 ] t0
n d n a n Ma ra z m ry"►p+X
{ C r? A w to W.(DD Jam,
4 0 n ~I• O p f+ O d 0 p n
o ro ° to K 'a A 7
c A n A
n b ro 11 D•°Dn~
~jQp' s A a
i m
c to N
M 9
o n
C" r• • :r m co
A VS x no
n G a
m F, '0 rr A • g i ;
n
A +o d ~ m +a ~;r
✓ m anNwz
n O N~pprrO
A7 A A C! r
0 (a,
I O M d ~
M ro m A M n
d a
a
IV d5 o
el pp w 6 a
0 A S K C"
or 7~0 r 0
A n n0,r+y0
10 4
n N N 6
✓ M +1 M
f A 0 r0
r+ 7i n
tr < A
Ap✓7tW
M n o
e o It a g
m or, nn
r
M r 0 0
,g o
an~v
i A M
Ydtta
G. d f~! •ri
PROJECT LOCATION _
l ! ~t r ~!Snr urn r " ~
M y~y .t: -~ri' r;~ IOW •I r~ , ~4,~_.( ,
..a f..~ r ` r \ q
. 1=4
rd EIR
IWO
• r
r, T
O • w 7 7 3 7
~ 05 ~Rio
C1 C ° p • , r~
a 3 ■ ° V1 33,00
gig,:
Z h
0 m 0 o ; w C■
CL -u p c
»
O O w ° • •
OD 113 p aw n
50 cr
• 06 03, co,
C o
o~■~i ~_r~n 3~
r
• • • ~ b
° 0
A n 2 7 V
» •
N o v • a
4A 01'2
x CL
° r 0 7• M w f •n
d
o r
3;<3s; i w
~a
0 n w POP
» a N/
0 0. y -o r
44
to
r 3 r w v f..~ O
in b xw
f O a « i v°
p, w o v 7 g 0
> i 3 3
r z
to 9 0 7' p` N
o M a N
> x = Tv ~ COL
1~~ II
x a 0 3° i
G g 9 q o i 3
M if r. t e 0 I.rl
~H 2 0
v -O
O M i i O
% b row « w ~ ~
` M
t i• ~ w C ~ K ~
i
i ~ O O
d = ~ rrl _
O Z ~ C) >
a --j G) O
n
y p G~ -Ph, w rTi -i
z 0 00
D0~
to DO>> r- (Aox
A ~'T1ZC7~0
-A rm
N 0 r rI (n Z7 1-- r n
x ao o co --i O 1~1 ---I D
to -4 rT1 Z
f' > C44
W %4 r X •
C4o X(m D D --~p~~
V' ' y
~oN0 =NZ Lrl
--4 -4 D G)
M D
HANDOUT 8-3-43
I
I
°
HO
•
MELES N
ESS a
I Of
DENT i
oN
t
I.
wie P'
WCSt '
3908 AtWlh)i
"17rnton,°7'`X 7~2di ,I
A6
1
nton
Ctty
Y 4 1 I ~ ~ 1
? //yI 1 1.•AIr. V~ k ri
1
.01
°
s
}
I
f
j
Julie West Page 1
3908 Atlas Drive
Denton, Texas 76201
382-6808
Homelessness in Denton
My name is Julie West and 1 have been a resident of Denton for the past seven months. Mayor Castleberry and
council members, tonight I would like to address the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy of Denton
(CHAS). I applaud the city of Denton for it's perspective in wanting to assess homelessness as an integral part of
the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy,
Homelessness is a social concern that affects all of us--both directly and indirectly. Numbers accounting for the
homeless have risen to their highest level since the Great Depression (Bingham, 1987). Estimates of the home-
less range from 250,000 to one million. The General Accounting office estimates an annual growth rate of be-
tween 10 and 38 percent of homeless persons (Rossi, 1989). It would be unrealistic for us to think Denton
immune from this social tragedy.
The term homeless brings a number of stereotypes to mind. However, homeless persons include those who have
fallen prey to a devastating economic system, victims of domestic violence and their children, runaway youth,
and individuals with mental health concerns. An example pertains to those who earn minimum wage with no
insurance and have had a sick child. The medical bills cause the family to lose everything thus pushing them over
the brink of affording housing.
The homeless are made up of single people, two-headed households, the mentally ill, female-headed households,
chemical abusers, the unskilled, runaway youth, and children, The reason for this point is simple, policy makers
should not muddle together this highly diverse group of people. Homelessness is made up of distinct groups of
people with common needs yet many discriminating needs. These distinctions enable policymakers, like your-
selves, to render aid to the mentally ill as well as to the able-bodied, respective of an approprate program.
The time a person remains homeless can naturally vary depending on employable skills and available resources.
The average homeless adult will remain homeless 10 months (Jones, 1987), Family households tend to be home-
less for shorter times with a mean of 3 months. Homeless men tend to be homeless for longer periods of time
with 2l% remaining homeless for more than four years.
A Texas task force accounts that between 1980 and 1986 there was a 42% increase in the numb,. 4poverty
level households in the state (Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs, 1991), but, % -he same
period, the number of publicly assisted housing units actually decreased. Poverty has increaed and available
housing has diminished, thus the growth of homelessness is a natural by-product. Consequently, it is imperative
the City of Denton Planning Department continue it's strides to assess and impact the housing needs of the
homeless.
1 also request the city of Denton consider all aspects that affect the homeless person and family, Such aspects as
physical health, mental health, chemical dependency, social isolation, inadequate governmental assistance, nutri-
tion, disabilities, and job training need to be addressed. 1 am aware that initially every service needed cannot be
available, however I am requesting a long term comprehensive approach to curve homelessness in Denton And,
if homelessness is to be curtailed, informative and constructive policies will need to be implemented.
I thank you for your attention and 1 urge your support and dedication in assessing our city's homeless needs
Julie West Page 2
3908 Atlas Drive
Denton, Texas 76201
382-6808
• References
Bingham, R. D., Green, R, E„ & White, S. B. (1987). The homeless in contempt mKi . Newberry Park,
CA: Sage Publications.
Jones, (1987, May 19), Youngsters share plight of homeless. Los Angeles Times.
Rossi, P. (1989), Without shelter: homeless in the 1980's. New York: Priority Press.
Rossi, P. (1989). Down and out in America: The origins of homeless. New York: Priority Press.
Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs, (1991). Homeless Com,pQnent of the Texas Comprehen
live Housing Affordabilily StreW. Austin, Texas. Author.
i
i
r
a
ro
11'here the Homeless Sleep
Fall
With family Other persons'
or retallvss places
3.0% 3.9%
Rented rooms
5.4% Shelters
41.4%
Publlo
places
14x7%
rr,(rnrar, of prr10nn IprrJiAa or n.,l
0" A,JAr in rarlaar plan.
VVr Or pan rnrn Jaya
fall winter
/ Shelters 61,2 62.3
Shoals or parks 11.1 9.1
SINe1./parMs f Public places 32.1 20.1
` Rated rooms 10.9 9.1
24.2% With family
or relallves 9.6 9.9
Oltwr persona'
\ Pteus 103 9 i
Winter
With family Other parsons'
or ralatlvee Place•
Rented rooms 3.1% 2.8%
3.3%
Public
places
12.9%
anelar•
Parka 70.7%
G ~p o 4.0%
0 u
o ,
G 0 O
0 • o
0 t7 p •
6 0
Nor N.Aanl lb,o) Ja not AJJ.p ra 160prq Inl O,rn r4J arises rr till Yrl H4 Wr pryp„rrNRl Yf IAf pall Irma
J.lr Il vnl In aM1anJmrJ AudJi npr, b, lu anJ ""A" 01,n wa lo, rrrl a rdr lruiC, ah un rana„rui wrN
luuir rrrrr Neni. l>,ran anJ DO in Ama¢a 1 h. Qnpnl al IlamJeumr.. fYfY
Length of Time Homeless
In a survey taken In late 1985 and early 1986, Chicago
homeless were asked how long they had been without a
home.
Months
Percentage
0 - 1
. 3 12.7
2
2 18.9
14.7
ti 7-12
13 . 24 14.3
25 - 48 14.3
` 49 - 119 12.1
t
120 + 7.0
6.9
Median (months)
r, ;';1 I.:~'~•; : J A'.wrage (months) 7.6
; r; , 21.9
SanrfC Prrer N. Rossi. Down end Out in America: The Origins of Homeletsness.
f 989.
Shelter Occupants
In what the Department of Housing and Urban Development
calls °a now chapter In the evolution of homeless shelters in
the United States;' unaccompanied men no longer make up
a majority of the residents of shelters for the homeless,
according to surveys of shelters conducted In 1994 and 1988.
The newcomers are families. In fact, the number of persona
in sheltered families more than quadrupled between 1984
and 1988.
1984
1988
Unaccompanied men 66% 46%
Unaccompanied women 13 14
Family members:
All types 21 40 /
Single parents M 15 5 r o ,
with children NA 30
Couples with °aN
children NA 6 4P~* Ioa.K
Couples without
children NA 4 f#
Nwe: Pdcrnu do not add up to 100 dug ro rounding. 1n 1980helter nionarra Mere
asked akw elleni ehamcWhIles lit January 1984, In 1988, rhrp +rrr asArd about an
overagr alghi b ween Srprrmber 1981 and Arrjrrfi 1988.
Sourer: Deparrmeal of Noustng and Urban Onelornrem. A Report on the 1988
National Survey of Shellen for the Homeless. AfarcA 1989,
Disabilities of the Homeless
This information comes from a 1988 survey in which mana-
gers of shelters were asked to estimate the respective
proportions of their adult clients, on an average night, who
had various problems. Some of the shelter residents, of
j course, had more than one problem; some had none.
35 ----00 -
33%
A = a~ 34%
F ff i
30 00
25 /e
L
25 -00-
21%qu~ tI
20 t ! IIJ1 ' y
0
15 Y
11%
io , r
o : , r it k • a:," , _ i= It ? . ~Y X19'
AIDS Alcoholism Domestic Drug Mental Physlcal
violence abuse Illness disabllity
Source. Pepartment of lloujing and Urban Development,
i
A
yF~
A
K
HANDOUT 8-3-93
D
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM,. John McGrane, Executive Director of Finance
DATE: August 3, 1993
SUBJECT: UPDATE OF REVISIONS IN THE 1993-94 PROPOSED BUDGET
Please be advised of the following items that have changed or will
change since the Major Budget Issues Report was presented to you on
June 29th.
A) SALES TAX - The sales tax collection estimates have been
revised for 1993-94 to $6,424,578. This is a $541776
increase over the initial estimate of $6,3690802 presented
to you in the Major Budget Issues Report. The new estimate
is still based on a three (34) percent growth over 1992-93,
but now includes a projection based on actual receipts
through June 1993.
B) PROPERTY TAX - The certified assessed property values for
Denton were received July 27th. The certified assessed
values indicate that an effective tax rate of $.7490 per
$100 valuation is necessary to produce the same revenues as
last year. The effective rate of $•7320 per $100 was
presented to you in the Major Budget issues Report and was
based on the preliminary assessed valuation. The rollback
rate for 1993-94 is $.8068 per $100 valuation.
C) Proposed for the 1993-94 budget is the plan to transfer the
Community Improvement Coordinator's position from the
Planning division in the General Fund to the Recycling
division in the Sanitation fund. The salary money for this
position has already been transferred from the Planning
division to the Recycling division. However, $3,673 still
remains in the Planning division budget to pay for office
supplies, travel, etc., for the Community Improvement
Coordinator's position. If Council adopts the proposal,
then the Planning division's target and budget will be
reduced by an additional $3,673 and the amount would be
available for redistribution.
8171566.8200 DIFW METRO 434.2528
Memo to Lloyd V. Harrell
August 3, 1993
Page 2
D) Page 427 of the statistical information section of the
budget reflects the gain (loss) in assessed property value,
expressed in percentages, for the past ten fiscal years.
The decimal is located in the wrong place for the 1992 and
1993 loss in value percentages. 1992 should read (4.2)% and
1993 should read (3.1)%.
E) Budgeted expenditures in the finance miscellaneous division
on page 267 will increase $700 to reflect payment of fees in
accordance with the Flow Hospital escrow agreement. The
funds will increase the amount of unreserved General Fund
balance used to balance the budget and are not reflected in
the proposed document.
/if
Arro068D
a
handout 6-3-93 -
MIKE COCHMN JU
610 NVEST OAK ST.
k _.ilfV d NA:ic_.:?..Jr
DENTON, TEXAS 7611a
July 11, 1993 J
Mayor Bob Castleberry
Members of the City Council
City of Denton
215 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76210
re: sidewalk replacement at City Hall and Civic Center
Dear Mayor Castleberry and members of Council,
At our July 6, 1993 meeting the O'Neil Ford Marker
Dedication Task Force discussed the Park Departments plans
for replacing the clay brick sidewalk around the City Fall
and Civic Center with fake brick concrete pavers. The task
force voted unanimously to urge council to consider reusing
the existing brick material in sidewalk renovation. For
aesthetic reasons it is felt that this would be more in
keeping with the Ford designed buildings, and from an
economic standpoint reusing existing material just makes
sense.
Although it is obvious that this sidewalk needs
attention, 2 feel that staff was laboring under several
misunderstandings when they wrote the specs for this work,
It was their understanding that
1) Ford did not specify brick pavers around City Hall
when he designed the building,
2) that bricks are less safe than fake brick concrete
pavers, and
3) that it costs more to reuse the existing material
than to replace it with a synthetic substitute.
i
i
\n
In fact, Ford did specify natural brick around the City
Hall and Civic Center. Last week I was in San Antonio at
Ford's office looking through the original plans for the
building and found that the exact same "basket weave' brick
pattern is specified in the drawings for the area in front of
and beside City Hall, tI have a copy for those that wish to
see them.) Apparently the plans consulted by the Parks
Department were incomplete.
During discussions with staff about the sidewalk I heard
numerous times that real brick is less safe than fake brick.
I questioned Mr. Dluga about his source of this information
and was referred to Mr. Jerry Clark, city engineer. It turns
out that Mr. Clark was referring to a different type of
concrete paver than those specified for this work. After
being informed which style of paver was being proposed Mr.
Clark stated that there is no difference safety-wise, between
real brick and the fake brick specified in the plans.
Originally it was felt by staff that it would be cheaper
to have the contractor take up the existing material, haul it
off and replace it with concrete pavers than to reuse what we
have in place. They argued that storing the old brick was a
burden and that it would likely never be used again. Later
they decided to keep the existing brick and possibly reuse it
around the City Hall courtyard. In the latest iteration, they
have suggested that Park Department personnel could take up
and stack the existing brick. By reusing the 708 to 808
existing material that is in perfect condition, having city
employees participate in some of the preliminary work and
replacing br?-ks that actually need replacing,public money
can be saved.
I have contacted Acme Brick about the possibility of
donating the replacement bricks for this project. The fact
that Ford was so involved in brick work his entire life and
did once work for Acme here in Denton makes it a perfect tie-
in. Another interesting aspect of this connection is that the
bricks used in the City Hall and Civic Center are actually
"E1-Fords" after Ford.
~y
!l'N M1t
t
I hope I haven't bored you with this deluge of
information about a seemingly trivial point, but at this time
in which we honor the contributions of O'Neil Ford in our
community it would seem a shame to cheapen that honor just a
bit with insensitive alterations to his work.
Sincerely,
A4 4cb,
Mike Cochran
i
i