HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-07-1993
eYeSKt~
OOOOOOGCo~~~~DCf N~0
O to
A4
"o N ~O~~ooOO
Q06
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
September 7, 1993
` II
I
ti
4Q~ NO-93
Agenda f
ckte
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
September 7, 1993
Special Call Session of the City of Denton City Council oil Tuesday,
September 7, 1993 at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of City
Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items
will be consideredo
5:15 p.m.
1. Hold a public hearing and consider a proposed ordinance
annexing and zoning a tract of 23.25 acres located north of
and abutting Ryan Road on Forrestridge Drive. (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval, 7-0)
2. Hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding the 1993-
94 fiscal year budget.
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Te.tas, on
the day of , 1993 at o'clock (a.m.)
CITY SECRETARY
NOTE.4 THE CITY OF DCNTON CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IS ACCESSIBLE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. THE
CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE
HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN
ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY
SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 566-8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS
DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX SO
THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH
THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE.
ACCO0146
AplfnbNes_.Q~.°
I
DA~ T, i3F43'
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FONT Qy L //.Z
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
Subject: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A PROPOSED ORDINANCE
(FIRST READING) ANNEXING AND ZONING A TRACT OF 23.25 ACRES
LOCATED NORTH OF AND ABUTTING RYAN ROAD ON FORRESTRIDGE
DRIVE. (A-62)
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Conunission recommends adoption.(7 -0)
SUMMARY:
a
City Charter (Section 1.03, Extension of the City Limits) requires that an annexation 4
ordinance be introduced to the City Council and be published in the official
newspaper of the City at least 30 days before the final passage of the ordinance.
The first reading therefore, is pertinent only to the annexation requirements and not
necessary for the zoning of the tract. The City Council public hearing to consider
the zoning of the tract is scheduled for October 19, 1993. At the same time
Council is scheduled to take final action vrith regard to the annexation of the tract.
An ordinance annexing and zoning 23.25 acres located north of and abutting Ryan
Road on Forrestridge Drive is attached. (See attachment #1) Exhibit "A" of the
ordinance contains the legal description of the tract to be annexed and zoned. The
Service plan included in appendix "B" provides for the extension of full municipal
services to the tract. The Ordinance also provides for the zoning of the tract to
single family SF-16 zoning district classificatlon.
BACKGROUND:
The proposed annexation and zoning of this tract has been initiated by the owners
in order to facilitate residential single family development (SF-16). City Council
held the first and second public hearings on the proposed annexation on August 3,
and August 17, respectively, and no one spoke In opposition. Planning and Zoning
Commission considered the proposed annexation and zoning of the tract on August
25, 1993 and unanimously recommended adoption.
A~o 9.8
AQWaUtl, .At~._._._
we7-0
PROGRAMS D .P RTMF►~►S OR GRpt1PS AIMOCTED 0?
All city service departments; including Utilities, Engineering, Planning/ and
Development, Fire, Police, Solid Waste, Environmental Health, Parks and Recreation,
and Library.
FISCAL IMPACT•
The annexation and ultimate development of this tract will expand the ciws tax
base,
Respec lly submitted:
C Lloyd V. Harrell
City Manager
Prepared by:
N ac~,QQ,~
Harry N, Persaud, A1CP
Senior Planner
Approved:
Frank H. Robbins, AIC
Executive Director for
Planning and Development
Attachment #1: Ordinance
Attachment #2: P & 2 Minutes
Page 2
r
J1\WPD0CS\0RD\RVAN.0 O~3
Apeodaltent„_._ ~i _
Otte
.1 a~/ is
ORDINANCE NO. D
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ANNEXING 23.25 ACRES OF
LAND LOCATED ALONG FORRESTRIDGE DRIVE AND NORTH OF RYAN ROAD;
APPROVING A SERVICE PLAN FOR THE ANNEXED PROPERTY; APPROVING SINGLE
FAMILY (SF-16) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AhD USE DESIGNATION
FOR THE ANNEXED PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. EREAS of Denton fors t eea aowners of nnexation of the propehave rty described hereinj and
y
WHEREAS, public hearings were held in the Council Chambers on and August 17, theu40th,day but before the 20th1day1bef(both
re he date being ion or after
nstitution
state their
viewseand present eeidence allow bear!g upon this persons anexation;and
WHEREAS, annexation proceedings were instituted for the
property described herein by the Introduction of this ordinance at
a meetira of the City Council on September 7, 1993; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full ono time in
the official newspaper of the City or Denton after annexation Council
takingdfinalwaction, asurequired tbyrCiyytyaCharter; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSt
SECTION I. That the tract of land described In exhibit 'All,
attached hereto and incorporated by reference, to annexed to the
City of Denton, Texas.
AZ.Q N ii. That the service plan attached as Exhibit "Bu and
incorporated by reference, which provides for the extension of
municipal services to the annexed property, is approved as part of
this ordinance.
SECT_ ON That the property annexed is perAanently zoned
for single fami)y (SF-16) zoning district classification and use
designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of
Denton, Texas.
SECTION IV. That the City's official zoning map is amended to
show the zoning district classification of the property annexed.
for anysra~, theShoitld any part
shall onothaffect ithe remaining ille al
port? on
of this ordinance and the City Council hereby declares it to befits
ApenANor93 AMI
ApoRdalterq,_
DateLq3
purpose to annex to the City of Denton all the real property
described in Exhibit "A" regardless of whether any other part of
the described property is hereby effectively annexed to the City.
If any part of the real property annexed is already included within
the city limits of the City of Denton or within the limits of any
other city, town or village, or is not within the City of Denton's
jurisdiction to annex, the same is hereby excluded from the
territory annexed as fully as if the excluded area were expressly
described in this ordinance.
UQTZON VI. That any person violating any provision of this
ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding
$2000.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated
shall constitute a separate and distinct offense.
SECTION Viz. That this ordinance shall become effective
fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City
Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance
to be published twice in the Denton Record Chronicle, the official
newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the
date of its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ,
1993.
SOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
ATTESTf
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BYt
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
PAGE 2
y 4
AQ~rtdeNow.23 ~3~
AOeadaltertU. ~"L.r.___.,~
EXHIBIT "A„
ESTATE OF FORRESTRIDGE, SECTION III
Being a tract of land situated in the A. Gibson Survey,
Abstract No. 498, Denton County, Texas and being a art of
"Tract I" of that certain parcel of land described in two
tracts and conveyed by deed from First Texas Savings
Association, to Lodge Construction Company, Inc. recorded in
Volume 1115, Page 211, Deed Records, Denton County, Texas
and being further described as followsr
BEGINNING at a 1/2" iron rod found for corner, said corner
being the Southwest corner of Lot 16, block A of Estates of
Forrostridge, Section I0 an addition to the City of Denton,
Denton County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in
Cabinet I, Page 151, Plat Records Denton County, Texass
THENCB South 85 degrees, 32 minutes, 05 seconds East, along
the South line of Block A of said addition, a distance of
10332.10 feet to a 1/;:" iron rod found for cornerl said
corner being the Southeast corner of Lot 7, Block C of said
additions ENCE aHfen 37 minutes, 33 seconds
West# ofeet
to a fence post for corner in the North line of Ryan Road,
said corner being the Southeast corner of said Lode
Construction Com an tra g
p Y ets
Northlin09
ofdegrees, 22
Roadtea,di47 stancenof 1#315.61 ofeet
to a 1/2" iron rod found for corner at a fence corner and in
the West line of said survey and in the North line of Ryan
Road, a public roadway, said point being the Southwest corner
of said Lodge Construction Company tracts
THENCE North 00 degrees, 19 minutes, 42 seconds West, along
the West line of said survey and along a fence, a distance of
810.95 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 23.25
Acres or 1,012,770 Square Feet of Land, more or less.
apenda~tern
Exhibit '73" •Z
S_~VI Af At~t
Anaexation Numbers
A-62
Acreage annexed:
t3.2S Acres
Location:
Nom of Rysa Road on Fonwhj* Drire
I
A • P..Q11ce s-e~---=x~
1• Patrollin
services will be °nse to calls, and other routine
the annexation, p ue~hded on the effective date of
equipment, g existing personnel and
2. Upon ultimate devel level of police services will bee area, the same
area as are furnished to comparablre va o thithin
the city,
8.
1• Fire protection and emergency
the present personnel and
res medical services by
fr the limitations of available scat equipment, within
om existing fire stations water and distances
this area on the effective date will
he annex
2• ation.
Upon ultimate
develo
of fire andemergepct °f the area,the same
be Provided to this area ambulance services will
comparable areas within the City are furnished to
C• 14ater/wee ewater Ser~+
Water and wastewater services will be extended to
property in accordance to the City's master utilit
the
and Section 34-118 of the Denton Code of ordinances,
y plan
Developers shall pay the actual cost
sewer main extensions, lift stations and other water and
facilities required to serve their development in
necessary
accordance with the city+g master utilit development in
Y plan and the
~ d
Apendallem
Dole '2 '
Subdivision and Land Development Regulations, 1~
The City may participate in the cost to oversize water
and sewer mains subject to fund availability and approval
of the City Council.
Where water or sewer main extensions, lift stations,
force mains or other necessary facilities are installed
by the developer, the developer shall be entitled to
reimbursement of the cost of such facilities from pro-
rata charges paid by persons connecting to or using such
facilities to serve their property, according to the
Subdivision and Land Development Regulations.
D. Solid Waste Collection
11 Solid waste collection will be provided to the
property at the same level of service as available
to comparable areas within the City, within 60 days
of the effective date of annexation.
2. As development and construction commence within
this property, and population density increases to
the proper level, solid waste collection shall be
provided to this property in accordance with then
current policies of the city as to frequency,
charges and so forth.
E. Streets and Roads
1. The City of Denton's existing policies with regard
to street maintenance, applicable throughout the
entire City, shall apply to this property beginning
with the effective date of the annexation.
2. Routine maintenance of streets and roads will begin
in the annexed area on the effective date of
annexation using the standards and level of service
as currently applied to comparable areas of the
city.
3. Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets,
Installation of storm drainage facilities,
construction of curb cuts and gutters, and other
such major improvements, as the need therefore is
determined by the city Council or Manager, will be
accomplished under the established policies of the
City.
4. Traffic signals, signage and other traffic control
devices will be installed as the need therefor is
2
Date
~a
established by appropriate study and traffic
standards.
5. Street and road lighting will be installed in the
substantially developed arose in accordance with
the established policies of the City.
F. Environments Health and Code Enforcement Services
1. Enforcement of the City's environmental health
ordinances and regulations including, but not
limited to the grass and weed ordinance, garbage
and trash ordinance, junked vehicle ordinance, sign
ordinance, food handler ordinance, animal control
ordinance, and the tree preservation ordinance
shall be provided within this area on the effective
date of the annexation. These ordinances and
regulations will be enforced through the use of
existing personnel.
2. Building, plumbing, electrical, gas, and all other
construction codes, as may be adopted by the City,
will be enforced within this area beginning with
the effective date of the annexation. Existing
personnel will be used to provide these services.
3. The City's zoning, subdivision and other ordinances
shall be enforced in this area beginning on the
effective date of the annexation.
4. All inspection services provided by the City of
Denton, but not mentioned above, will be provided
to this area beginning on the effective date of the
annexation. Existing personnel will be used to
provide these services.
5. Flood damage mitigation will be provided by
existing codes and ordinances of the City as of the
effective date of the annexation.
61 As development and construction commence within
this area, sufficient personnel will be provided to
furnish this area with the same level of
environmental health and code enforcement services
as are furnished to comparable areas within the
city.
0. Planning and Development Services
The zoning jurisdiction of the City will extend to the
annexed area on the effective date of annexation. Single
3
Agenda No 1 -07J,.
Agendallertt., 141~
eta ._._2_ q3
Family (SF-16) zoning classification is anticipated 4.1 /a
this tract.
I. Parks and Recreation Services
Residents of the newly annexed area may use all recreation
facilities, including parks and swimming pools throughout
the City, on the effective date of the annexation. The
same standards and policies now used within the city will
be followed in the maintenance of parka, playgrounds and
swimming pools.
J. gl@gtric Distribution
Electrical power will be made available to the site as
required, at the same level of service currently being
provided to comparable areas within the City.
K. Miscellaneous
Street names and signs will be installed, if required,
approximately six (6) months after the effective date of
annexation.
Residents of the newly annexed area may use all publicly
owned facilities, buildings or services within the city on
the effective date of the annexation. All publicly owned
facilities, buildings or services will be maintained in
accordance with established standards and policies now used
in the City.
L. Cagital Improvements Program ICU)
The CIP of the City is prioritized by such policy guidelines
asr
1. Demand for services as compared to other areas will be
basod on characteristics of topography, land utilization,
population density, magnitude of problems as related to
comparable areas, established technical standards and
professional studies.
2. The overall cost-effectiveness of providing a specific
facility or service.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP improvements in
the upcoming CIP plan. The annexation arca will be considered
according to the same established criteria as all other areas
of the City.
4
I
~I
ApenOaNa.~~+~-
A
Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes
August 25, 1993
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the
City of Denton was held Wednesday, August 25, 19930 in the Council
Chambers of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney Street.
PRESENT FROM P&Zt FChairman lemming, Richard cCooper# Mary Evelyn Huey,
Dick Norton, Barbara Russell.
ABSENT FROM PiZ1 None
PRESENT FROM STAFFS Frank Robbins, Executive Director of Planning
and Developments Owen Yost, Urban Planners
Mike Bucek, Assistant City Attorneys David
Salmon, Assistant city Engineor) Gerald
Cosgrove, Engineering Administrator,
Water/Wastewaters Cindy Cranford, Secretary.
Chairman Engelbrecht called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m.
1. The Commission adjourned into executive session at 5tlo p.m.
Chairman Engelbrecht called the regular session to order at
I1 Consider a recommendation oACity 's Council landfill. the
acquisition of property for the City
Dr. Huey moved to recommend the approval of acquisition of
land for the landfill. Mr. Cochran seconded and the motion
passed unanimously (7-0)
II. Consider approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of
August 110 1993.
Dr. Huey moved to approve the minutes of August 11, 1993. Ms.
Russell seconded and the motion carried unanimously (7-0)
III. Hold a public hearing on the proposed annexation of 23.25
II.
acres located north of, and abutting, Ryan Road on
Forrestridge Drive and consider making a recommendation to the
City council,
STAFF REPORTS given by Frank Robbins
Mr. Robbins reported that the Council adopted an annexation
schedule setting the date, time and place regarding the
proposed annexation (A-62). State law requires that a service
plan be prepared providing for the extension of full municipal
services to the area. The proposed annexation was initiated
a
Agenda No
AgendalteM, 20*f
-L~
Date
Planning i Zoning
Minutes of Aug. 25,1993
Page 2
by the owners in order to facilitate provision of Denton
services and utilities. The application for SF16 zoning is
being concurrently processed with the annexation. Two public
hearings have been held before the Council and no one has
spoken in opposition.
PETITIONER: Not present
IN FAVOR: None
IN OPPOSITION: Robert Heilig, 809 Ryan Road, Denton, Texas.
Mr. Heilig explained that his property abuts the property that
is to be annexed. He reported that store: drains were
installed with the last portion of the property that was
annexed, but when they got to the unannexed portion of the
land a berm was built next to his property and the drainage
flows onto his land. He said-the drainage was causing a
problem because the tract of land in question is higher than
his land. He said he was not opposed to the annexation, but
was concerned about the drainage and would like to have
something done.
Mr. Robbins said he appreciated the concern. He explained
that more could be done if the area in question were in the
City limits. He said he thought the issue could be dealt with
in the platting process.
David Salmon said the existing storm drain would be extended
down Ryan Road.
Dr. Huey asked about the berm.
Mr. Heilig said twenty feet of trees were cut for a drainage
ditch and a berm was put in by his property to help hold the
water. He said there were some places where water stands.
Mike Cochran asked Mr. Salmon if it was in the plans to take
care of the problem.
Mr. Salmon said there would be some underground drainage
systems. He said he hoped the plans that would be submitted
would have more detail as to the correction of these problems.
The owners are aware of the problem and have been told that it
needs to be fixed.
Mr. Engelbrecht asked that staff keep Mr. Heilig informed of
the plans and the progress, The platting process should take
care of the issue.
AaeneaNo
Dote
Planning 6 Zoning Sao
Minutes of Aug. 25,1993
Page 3
PETITIONER: Buddy Roberts, 11020 Audelia Dr. suite C220,
Dallas, Texas
Mr. Roberts said he was an engineer for Dal-Tech. Mr. Roberts
explained that the zoning request was to continue the same
type of development as in the Forrestridge area. He explained
the drainage has been an issue from the beginning. He pointed
out and explained the drainage. He said the water could not
be drained over a hill and the difference in elevation was 16
feet. The owner asked one of the neighbors next to the
property if they could drain across his property. The owner
of the piece of property declined. There would only have been
a small amount of water, but because the neighbor would not
cooperate they had to drain the other direction. He explained
that they are being told that the drainage was going to have
to be discharged down to the creek. He said the engineering
plans that were being drawn would hopefully take care of the
drainage. The developer is willing to do all he can and we
will work with the City and the County to fix the problem, and
help with the erosion.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommended approval of A-62.
Public hearing was closed.
Mr. Cochran moved to recommend approval of A-62. Mr. Cooper
seconded and the motion passed unanimously (7-0).
IV. Hold a public hearing to consider zoning 23.2520 acres to a
single family (SF-16) zoning district, located north of, and
abutting, Ryan Road. The tract, known as the Estates of
Forrestridge, Phase II, is situated at the south end of the
Forrestridge Drive in Denton's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction.
Staff Report: given by Owen Yost
Mr. Yost explained that the zoning request was for the same
piece of land as the annexation. He said 25 owners were
notified and two replies were received in favor. The request
was for 23.2520 acres (Proposed as 43 lots) of undeveloped
land located north of, and abutting, Ryan Roadf situated at
the south end of the present Forrestridge Drive. The tract is
located in low intensity areas. Forrestridge is a collector
street. 60 feet of Right-of-Way with a minimum paving width
of 41 feet is required. Ryan Road will be expanded to a 4-
lane divided secondary arterial street. Denton County funds
will pay for the repaving. No driveway access will be allowed
onto Forrestridge Drive or Ryan Road (from the north).
Utilities are adequate for the proposed development. The
Ap*N4
Svxx"y or RESPONSES
1993-94 PVOPOS04 Budget
September 7, 1993
ApeMaNo
Date ~
SUMMARY OF RESPONSES
1993-94 Proposed Budget
September 7# 1993
1. Library staffing/Funding
2. Proposed Pay Plan
3. Funding for Poison Control Center
4. Solid Waste Rate
5. Early Sale CO's for Police, Fire, and Library
6. Court of Record
Ap idaNo_..._~.-.-~-
anda.t ~r------
Date
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TEL EPHONE (817) 566.8200
M E M O R A N D U M
a a e 3 a e a a a a
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM. EVA POOLE, LIBRARY DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: MAJOR BUDGET ISSUE - LIBRARY STAFFING
DATE: SEPTEMBER 31 1993
The Library organization presently has 31.5 employees, three of
which fill temporary positions. These three temporary positions
were filled this summer to help alleviate the tremendous backlog of
books and materials unshelved in Support Services. The backlog has
now been eliminated due to the exchange of the vacated Library
Services Manager for the temporary positions.
Last FY 1992-93, approximately 584,592 items were checked out by
our full-time staff which includes two clerks, four library pages,
and one library assistant. in addition these seven employees have
to get 584,592 items back on the shelves, and process almost 6,000
overdue notices each year.
As service levels continue to increase, we will continue to need
these temporary employees in a permanent capacity to effectively
and efficiently keep pace of the demand and provide quality service
to all our library users.
increased clerical staffing will provide for an additional clerk to
circulate items, and an additional page to reshelve materials in a
more timely fashion. An additional clerk will be added to
Technical Processing in order to get new books cataloged and
processed for the main library and the new branch facility as well.
With additional staff in Technical Processing, we will be ready to
move into the branch library in a far more harmonious fashion.
Please keep in mind that we will need to have an additional 15,000
volumes ready for circulation when the branch opens.
I am willing to sacrifice the Library Services Manager position
permanently,,, ord to provide better overall library staffing.
l
EVA 0 E '
LIBRARY DIRECTOR
AHH00440
ApendaNo
Agendaltertl,-.-'~
Date
WY OI DENroN, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Jon Fortune, Management Services Administrator
DATE: September 3, 1993
SUBJECT: LIBRARY BUDGET
Per your request, please find attached a copy of a detailed Library
Budget Comparison for the past three years, plus the 1993-94
proposed budget.
If you have any questions, please advise.
JFtlb
AFr0072E
8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529
LIBRARY BUDGET COMPARISON aG~dat~o_~---'
1990-91 1991-92 1992-~ar~~-9 q
Service Maintenance 8021 146,527 100,607 17,10e1 924---~3/
Office Clerical 8022 233,901 299,265 372,475 425,161
Professional 8024 203,015 183,003 213,580 189,504
Management 8025 69,' 15 102,715 68,541 55,567
Temporary/Seasonal 8026 0 600 15,200 0
Overtime 8041 0 0 0 0
Longevity 8051 8,464 9,724 10,380 10,512
FICA 8061 49,184 52,110 56,977 51,842
TMRS 6062 35,335 39,164 41,372 44,281
Workers Comp 8064 2,589 2,686 2,635 1,868
Health Ins 8085 61,027 66,216 66,763 81,647
Life Ins 8068 0 3,823 2,242
Salary Adjustment 8090 0 0 899 0
Salary Savings 8095 5,468 6,448 8,1621 0
( ) ( ) {
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 603,669 849,642 861,648 859,548
Office Supplias 8101 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000
Books & Magazines 8102 5,167 6,200 6,200 6,200
Postage 8109 5,272 6,000 5,575 6,000
Janitorial 8111 2,200 2,500 4,000 3,000
Rec Program 8112 1,200 1,000 1,000 1,000
Other Supplies 8116 5,594 6000 8,000 4,725
TOTAL SUPPLIES 23,433 25,700 28,775 24,925
Bldg & Equip 8301 1,500 1,500 1,329 3,004
Office Machines 8341 1,300 1,683 4,419 3,994
Machinery & Equip 6343 0 0 0 0
Other 8345 0 1 000 3,508 5,000
TOTAL FIAINTENANCE 2,800 4,183 9,255 11,998
Telephone Fixed Cost 8500 5,000 0 4,074 4,152
Telephone 8501 0 6,000 2,506 2,000
Special Services 8502 31,704 31,186 30,147 29,046
Travel 8503 7,956 5,099 3,725 4,000
Due & Publications 8505 375 400 400 478
Meals 8511 0 0 0 1 r0
Schools & Seminars 8522 1,980 1,380 2,564 1,475
Manpower Services 6524 0 900 0 0
Electric Service 8525 40,000 43,000 45,170 45,000
Water & Sewer Service 8526 3,000 2,000 1,440 3,000
Sanitation Service 8526 400 600 510 540
TOTAL SERVICES 90,415 90,565 90,538 89,841
Books 9109 _ 84,300 81,400 69,972 86,000
TOTAL FIXED ASSETS 84,300 81,400 69,972 88,000
TOTAL 1 0 ,b7 ~~0Y,436 1,060.18 ~ 'f
Percent Increase 4.67°/. 0,634/0 1,14%
Staffing levels 29.5 29.5 29.5 31 ,5
i
ApssMe No
ApeodaltrnM
gaterg~
MEMORANDUM
To: Lloyd Harrell - City Manager
From: Tom Klinck - Director of Human Resources
Subject: 1993/94 Budget - City Council Ouestions - Follow-
up to Memo - 4% Pay Increase - Police 6 Fire
Date: Sept. 1, 1993
Lloyd, this memo is to follow-up on my August 12, 1993, memo
concerning the difference in average pay increase for Non-
Civil Service employees and Civil Service employees. It
provides additional information requested by City Council to
grant a pay increase to all Civil Service employees as
follows:
1. All Police Officer and Fire Fighter positions (including
Recruits) would be granted a 4% adjustment to their
salary in addition to scheduled steps identified by their
pay plan.
2. Police Officers, Police Sergeants, Police Lieutenants,
and Police Captains currently at top-of-range (TOR) would
be granted a 4.6% increase and adjustment to the salary
plan.
3. Fire Fighters, Drivers, Captains, Battalion Chiefs, and
the Assistant Chief who are at top-of-range (TOR) would
be granted a 4.6% increase and adjustment to the salary
plan.
In my August 12, 1993 memo, I indicated that an increase of
4% to 4.6% increase for all Civil Service employees would
cost $36,950.
By granting a 4% increase to Police Officers and Fire
Fighters employees who would also be entitled to a "step"
increase and granting a 4.6% increase to those TOR employees
(as indicated above), the cost to the General Fund would be
$22,136 (Police - $8,283 and Fire - $13,853). This is
$10,933 less than the $36,850 increase for a .6% as outlined
in my August 12th memo.
The difference ($22,136) for the pay increases for Civil
Service employees, shown in 1., 2., and 3. above, would
represent an additional cost over the recommended 1993/94
Compensation Proposal in the 1993/94 Budget under
consideration by City Council,
j
Agenda NO.~_~
aQenda►tert~, -
Rated - -
Sept. 1, 1993
Memo to L. Harrell - 1993/94 Budget - City Council Questions
page 4%14.6% Civil Service Pay Increase
Please let me know if I can answer questions or clarify a
point.
Thomas W. h.linck
LHMEMOI 7. T!'.
9/1/93
Date
CITY 0 DENTON, TEXAS MUN101PAL BULL DING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 3, 1993
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
FROM: John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance ;
SUBJECT: FUNDING FOR THE POISON CONTROL CENTER
The City has recently received a request from the County Judge to
help fund the Poison Control Center at Parkland Hospital. The
total cost for the county is $46,620. Attached is a schedule that
prorates this total to the various cities and to Denton county. As
you can see from the schedule, the request from the City of Denton
is $10,676. I have contacted the City of Lewisville to see what
they were going to do. At the present time, their philosophy is
that this service is a direct benefit to the hospitals and that if
the hospitals wanted to contribute, they could; but, the city was
not considering doing such at the present time. I have also
contacted the City of Carrollton, but have not gotten a response
back from them.
If I can provide any further assistance, please advise.
Jmcolaf
Attachment
AFF00729
8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529
6
AgendaNo 93 D ~%S
Apendaltek -a
Date _ , _ 9--
9 i
FINANCING OF
DENTON COUNTY POIBODCONTROL AERVICEB
CITY 1993 COG POPULATION PRORATED
POPULATION PERCENTAGO C08T8
ARC*YLE 1,700 .006 $ 280.
AUBREY 2,150 .004 136.
CARROLLTON 46,855 .159 7,413.
CORINTH 4,150 .014 6536
DENTON 67,350 .229 10,676.
DALLAS 14,656 .050 2,331.
DOUBLE OAK 11700 .006 280.
FLOWER MOUND 21,150 .072 31357.
HICKORY CREEK 11900 .006 280.
HIGHLAND VILLAGE 8,350 .028 10305.
JUSTIN 1,250 1004 186.
KRUM 10600 .005 233.
LAKE DALLAS 3,750 .012 559.
LEWISVILLE 490750 .170 71923.
LITTLE ELM 11200 .004 186.
PILOT POINT 21550 4008 373.
ROANOKE 11750 1006 280.
SANGER 31350 .012 559.
SHAbY SHORES 11050 .004 186.
THE COLONY 231050 .078 3,636.
TROPHY CLUB 41050 .014 653.
Nrou W.rt1' 30.850 .105 5•oBI,
TOTAL 2930361 11000 6 46#420.
6
Agenda No 9-3 d"
~r.''' alto
(
•.lC, ~ f ~ Lil
\ ` I ~ do
JEFF MOSELEY
COUNTYJUDGE J
August 27, 1993
Honorable Bob Castleberry
Mayor
City of Denton
215 E. McKinney Street
Denton, TX 76201
Dear Mayor Castleberry,
As you may be aware, SB 773, which will provide statewide
funding for Poison Control was passed by the Texas Legislature
this year. Unfortunately, funds will not become available to
support Poison Control until next year. Therefore it is the
responsibility of the county, hospitals and the cities within the
county to ensure that this service is provided to our residents
once again.
As you may recall, last year the Poison Control Center
requested financial assistance from the county, hospitals and
individual cities to help cover the cost of operation. Due to
the lack of participation from the cities within Denton County,
the county eventually paid the majority of the annual costs.
Although this program is vital to the safety of each of our
residents, the County is extremely reluctant to assume all of the
costs again this year.
The shared cost of providing preventive poison control
services is very little compared to the potentially tragic costs
if reliable poison information is not available. We also believe
that poison control services will help to control ambulance
service costs, by eliminating unnecessary trips.
In fact, we are of the opinion that there is direct
relationship between the availability of poison control services
and the cost of ambulance services. Realizing that Denton County
is a significant contributor to the funding of local emergency
medical services, there may be a variety of alternatives for
financing poison control if shared funding does not become a
reality.
DENTON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT s COURTHOUSE-ON-THE -SQUARE
110 W. HICKORY a DENTON, TEXAS 74201 o (617) 6444447 1 1.800.344.4140
a
N
bQ1Ads~le_
Dace
City of Denton
August 27, 1993
Page Two.
The intent of this letter is to advise you of the necessity
for the development of a shared funding plan. As the deadline
for setting our budget draws near, it is important that the
county receive notification of your intent by September 8th,
1993.
It is our hope that Denton County and the City of Denton can
join together in the provision of this important service for the
residents of our communities.
Xt,0
Y
ty Judge
cc: Commissioners Court
Bing Burton, Director of Health
x
ApendaNo~~~~--. D
Date
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 3, 1992
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
FROM: John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance
SUBJECT: NORTH TEXAS POISON CONTROL CENTER
Pursuant to your request, I have surveyed various entities on their
intentions of contributing to Parkland Hospital's North Texas
Poison Control Center. The following is a summary of responses.
The City of Lewisville has denied the request by
the Center for a contribution. In talking with
the City Secretary, the Council's decision was
based on their philosophy that the contribution
should come from their area hospitals. It is my
understanding that the HCA Hospital in
Lewisville is contributing $5,000 to the Center.
• Denton County has authorized a contribution of
$50000 to the center and they are sending a
letter to the various cities and hospitals
recommending that each consider a contribution.
• Denton Regional Medical Center is not going to
contribute to the Center. They feel they have
adequate information in their computerized
system in order to handle poisoning cases that
may arise.
• MCA Denton is not going to make a contribution
to the Center. In talking with the Assistant
Administrator, they have indicated that they use
an 800 number for the Poison Control Center in
Galveston and they feel that serves their needs
adequately. They have also indicated that the
North Texas Poison Control Center is giving them
an option to either contribute $10,000 or pay
8171666.8200 D/fW METRO 434.2629
AgendaNo. ~I3 D3~
Agenda
~tem
$125.00 per call to the center. The Assist had Administrator indicated that, even if they had ~
to use the Parkland Facility, it would be
cheaper for them to go on a per call basis. He
also indicated that for the same amount it is possible to computerize into their fsymone
stem
a poisoning control information system.
However, they did feel the physicians available
to help consult in those type of circumstances
could still be utilized through Galveston.
• Parkland Hospital North Texas Poison Control
Center. In talking with Mary Churchill from the
Center, she has indicated that it is their
intention that as of October 1, if sufficient
contributions to offset the cost for servicing
Denton County residents are not made available
they will have to discontinue service to either
county residents or individual city residents.
If service is discontinued through Parkland Hospital, our 9-1-1
dispatcher would need to utilize an alternate source for referral.
I have not been able to discuss with the local hospitals the
ability for referral. However, it may be possible to utilize the
Galveston Center.
If you need any additional information, or have any further
questions, please advise.
JFMCGaaf
AFF00388
a
ApenQBNo_. D
Date
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILOJNG / 215 E. hlcKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201
M E M O R A N D U M
T0: R. E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities
FROM: Bill Angelo, Director of Community Services
DATE: September 2, 1993
SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO BUDGET QUESTIONS
During the August 31, 1993, City Council meeting, a few questions
were raised concerning the new recycling programs proposed in the
Solid waste Budget. in an attempt to respond to specific ques-
tions, the following information has been prepared.
QUESTION #1
What percent of the solid waste revenue is required to cover
existing recycling expenses and what part of the proposed rate
increases are required to fund the proposed recycling pro-
grams?
The Baseline Budget for Recycling for the 1993.94 fiscal year is
proposed with expenses estimated at $124,775. These expenses cover
the cost of one commercial driver, the operation and maintenance of
two vehicles, container maintenance, advertising and the refurbish-
ment of the Dallas Drive Recycling Center. Revenues from existing
programs are estimated at $67,500 resulting in a net loss of
$57,275 which is covered through subsidies of $42,956 from
residential revenues and $14,319 from commercial revenues. Table 1
depicts the cost, revenues, subsidies, and percent of revenues for
the existing program.
A8093C/l
6171566.8200 D/FW METRO 404.2529
ApendlNo 9 -
A
e
9
Cate 9 " ?
RESPONSE TO BUDGET QUESTIONS
September 2, 1993
Page 2
TABLE 1
RES COMM RES ti COM
COST REVENUES SUBSIDY SUBSIDY REVENUES REVENUES
EXISTING RECYCLING
PROGRAMS {124,775 { 67,500 42,956 134,319 2.2% 613
Relative to the new programs proposed in the budget, total costs
are estimated at $282,581 with revenues estimated at $174,497. The
resulting net loss would be covered by a $64,675 subsidy from
Residential and a $46,101 subsidy from Commercial. Table 2 depicts
the cost of each program, revenue estimates, residential and
commercial subsidies required and the rate increases necessary to
fund each program.
TABLE 2
NEW RECYCLING PROGRAMS
RES RES COMM
PRODUCT RES CONK RATE RATE RATS
COST REVENUES SUBSIDY SUBSIDY INC INC INC
Recycling Coordinator { 56,116 1 20,000 / 15,055 {18,055 {0.10 .94% .82%
In-House and office
Paper Plastics { 29 1 227 11 000 $ 0 ,934 1 1,181 i 24,077 {12,676 10.13 1.26% .20%
Cable e Recycling { 38
Cable Swap { 51500 / 0 / 5 ,500 1 0 {0.03 .79%
Waste Oil collection 1 91900 1 0 { 9,900 { 0 {0.06 .52% 0
Cardboard Recycling 1 32,974 $ 3:03 16 1 0{ 0 10.00 0 0
Separate Yard Waste/
Composting { 84,650 1 85,000 1 0 1 0 {0.00 0 0
Recycling 1o.a4 1L ~1-
site Expansion L3,iaM 1 11,000 $-~Q 1`1~
TOTAL 12521551 11740497 1 64,675 {46,101 10.36 3.36% 2.16%
As indicated in Table 2, neither the cardboard Recycling nor the
Separate Yard Waste Collection program impact the rate increase as
eacl. of the programs are fuprogram ed troieh fundel under separate rateast eccture.
The Cardboard Recycling commercial rate which will apply to only those customers subscrib-
ing to the service. This rate is an average 10% below proposed
received for the product o collected. Thus, savings experienced by A8093C/2
materials landtre revenues to
~I
f
v
{
Aflenda No _ y~.r~-3
Ape~dafterrZ
RESPONSE TO BUDGET QUESTIONS Date _rZ;
Septrmber 2, 1993
Page 3
a customer with a relatively high volume of cardboard waste will be
able to reduce their overall solid waste bill by participation in
the program.
Likewise, the Separate Yard Waste Collection/Composting program
will be funded by revenues generated by fees for the special
collection of brush, grass clippings and leaves. As recommended by
the Public Utilities Board, the rate for such collections would be
$4.00 per cubic yard for brush collected in excess of one (1) cubic
yard and fifty cents ($.50) per bag for each bag of yard waste
collected over six (6) bags, There has been some discussion by the
Council, however, to apply these rates to all yard waste collected,
thereby eliminating the free service for one (1) cubic yard of
brush and six (6) bags of other yard waste. Under this program,
customer will have the option of using the City service, contract-
ing such service out, or reducing their yard waste through backyard
composting or utilizing mulching mowers.
The proposed Residential rate increase of $.50 from $10.65 per
month to $11.15 per month equates to a 4.47% increase and will
generate $90,120 in additional revenue. Approximately three-
quarters of the rate increase is required to provide the Residen-
tial subsidies for the new Recycling program. Specifically, the
Recycling Coordinator's position requires a $.10 per month or a
.94% rate increaser the Plastic Recycling program requires a $.13
per month or a 1.26% rate increaser the Cable Swap Network requires
a $.03 per month or .29% rate increase, the Waste Oil Collection
program requires a $.06 or a .52% rate increase; and, the Recycling
Site Expansion requires a $.04 or a 37% rate increase. Should
these programs be eliminated, the Residential rate required to fund
the remainder of the budget would decrease from $11.15 per month to
$10.80 per month which represents an overall rate increase of $.15
per month or 1.4%.
The proposed Commercial rate increase of 8.46% will generate
$187,474 in additional revenue. Approximately one-quarter of the
rate increase is required to fund the Commercial subsidies for the
new Recycling programs. Specifically, the Recycling Coordinator
position requires a .82% rate increase; the in-house and Office
Paper Recycling requires a .82% rate increase; the Plastics
Recycling requires a .20% rate increase; and, the Recycling Site
Expansion requires a .32♦ rate increase, Should these programs be
eliminated, the Commercial rate increase required to fund the
remainder of the budget would be 6.38%
A8093C/3
g
3-~--
Agenda No
AAenda1tem `2_
Date q- 'l-!g
RESPONSE TO BUDGET QUESTIONS
September 2, 1993
Page 4
i would point out that the failure to fund the in-house/Office
Paper Recycling program will severely limit the City's ability to
comply with the provision of Senate Bill 1340 (the Parker Bill).
This bill requires all governmental agencies to implement formal
recycling programs including, but not limited to, white paper,
computer paper, cardboard, and aluminum. The position included in
this program would handle these materials. Additionally, the
elimination of this program would require the City to discontinue
office paper collection for DISD schools, TWU, and Texas Health
Enterprises.
While not a question from the City Council, it is necessary to
inform them of the recent events relative to the collection and
disposal of appliances. As of October, 1993, we will no loner be
able to dispose of appliances with refrigerants or PCB capacitors
in the landfill. In essence, the new regulations require that
refrigerants and/or PCB capacitors be removed from appliances prior
to disposal. Our research has indicated that removal of the
refrigerants and/or capacitors would cost the residents about
$25.00 per unit.
In order to lessen the burden of this expense to our customers, we
have reached an agreement with Fulton Supply and Recycling relative
to this matter. Mr. Fulton has agreed to accept these appliances
from the City at a price of $3.00 per unit. His employees will
remove the refrigerants and/or capacitors and salvage any recycla-
ble materials from the appliances. Non-recyclable materials such
as insulation and plastics will be returned to the City for
landfill disposal. Any PCB capacitors will also be returned to the
City for proper disposal. Under this approach, we will be able to
keep the cost to our customers down to $10.00 per unit.
A8093C/4
■
xwn a
y~ _4 3~,-3
ppenda No
Agenda t tan,,._.~2&~
RESPONSE TO BUDGET QUESTIONS Date- Q`
September 2, 1993
Page 5
Should you have any questions or comments on this matter, please
let me know.
Respectfully submitted,
Bill Angelo
I
I
II
i
A6493C/5
Agenda No !91
A6enda11",--±9.
Date. V-2-
/
e 3/
C1TV of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BLNLDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 3, 1993
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
FROM: John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance
SUBJECT: EARLY SALE CO'S FOR POLICE, FIRE, AND LIBRARY
It is anticipated that the sale of $1,950,000 in Certificates of
obligation for the purchase of computer equipment for Police, Fire
and Library is to take place later in fiscal year 1991-94. The
later-sale is proposed so that principle and interest would not
have to be paid in the 1993-94 fiscal year and it would coincide
with the funding of the Capital Improvements Program.
If the sale of the Certificates of obligation were moved to earlier
in the year, approximately $16,300 would be needed for monthly debt
service requirements. For example, if the sale was to take place
in January, a principle and interest payment would be due on July
1, 1994. Therefore, seven months of debt service would require an
additional $114,100 to be provided in the general debt account.
This could be accomplished by increasing the tax rate by $.0063 per
$100 or by finding an additional $114,100 in increased revenues or
expenditure reductions elsewhere in the budget, if the tax rate
were to be increased, and it was added on to the effective rate,
the tax rate would go from $.7490 to $.7553 per $100 of value.
Again, any further movement, either forward or backward, in the
sale date would increase or decrease the amount of funding
necessary.
If I can provide any additional information, please advise.
JFNcOIaf
W0012D
8171686.8200 DIFW METRO 4342529
x
AgendaNo ~~3 - -
Agendallem &L
D Date 9_~-9& 0?14 121
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICfPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) S66.8307
Office of the City Manager
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
DATE: September 3, 1993
SUBJECT: Municipal Court cf Record
The Council Municipal Court of Record Committee met on Thursday,
September 2, at 5:30 p.m., in the City Manager's Corference Room,
to review several options regarding implementation of the court of
record. Options 1, 2, and 3 as reviewed are attached.
Option 1 included lease space, most likely at the Federal Building,
as well as recording and sound equipment to facilitate the court
of record operations. Believing that there was inadequate time to
advertise and hire personnel and following the steps necessary to
implement the court, it was determined the earliest start date
would be January, 1994. The costs associated with this option were
$229,056, less the projected revenue for nine months of $183,450,
left a deficit of $45,606. A second alternative associated with
option i would have used the city Council chambers. However, it
was determined that current scheduling of the Chambers and the time
needed to adequately advertise and recruit personnel would have
also made this alternative impractical.
Option 2 assumed a relocation to DMC and operating a day court
only. This option featured the construction of an additional
courtroom equal to that currently being constructed. Total cost
for this option was $166,829, less the anticipated revenue of five
months, $101,917, left a deficit of $64,912.
Following examination and discussion of the options, the Council
committee selected Option 3 as the preferred alternative, with some
revisions. This option as re-ised now includes construction of a
shell of a second courtroom. Further, the option assumes night
court operations on two evenings a week as well as day court and
an implementation date to coincide with the relocation to the
Denton Municipal Complex (DMC). The suggested date of occupation
of the DMC is May, 1994. Consequently, the court of record would
be established by ordinance to begin operations at that time and
operate for a full five months from May through September, 1994.
t
tt
"f
AQ9ndAN0
Agendaqml VZ-•--- gg.ats of Convg sicn
it is anticipated that the court of record will dictate that our
existing court, personnel, and operation will need to increase its
function by 100%. simply stated, this court differs from our
current intensive municipal i equipment and t personnel. er However, atm Councils
request, the Staff worked hard to ensure passage of KB 2851
creating Denton's court of record to improve our court operations
and provide more convenience to our citizens. In time, operating
a court of record will equate to more efficient disposition of
cases arising in Denton; a reduction of appellate actions and
costs; offenses n committed efficient in the City. Thee costs associated i with misdemeanor
j option are as follows.
Option 3 assumes relocation tc- the DMC where a fully equipped court
room ead
However,'
sched sound isy stem and a plea spaceu forotheecourt operati nsl inclu
the Council Committee suggested that consideration be given to
building the shell for a second court room. This area could then
be used for jury selection and other court related activities. By
constructing the shell, the City could save on phone and air
cost i for becomes constructing necessary the t shell finish
conditioning ond n court heating room. The when
out the sec as
described 3s $270385. This includes $24,540 for construction,
$1,345 for operations and maintenance, and $1,500 for furniture.
meethe t of record, an updated the is needed. filing cost t
and additional work space for court cler of
this system is estimated at $11,600. Recording equipment to comply
with the requirement for electronic transcription is approximately
$4,000. A separate sound system is not necessary since the
construction of the courtroom at the DMC includes provision for the
sound system. Supplies, basically forms and postage, are estimated
at $7,566 for the five month period.
The greatest cost associated with the court of record is personnel.
To operate the court, the Judge has requested a a dd7tional
permanent part-time judge. Council has previously approve
and this is in the baseline 1993-1994 budget for judicial
proceedings related to juvenile court. This request for this judge
involves an additional 23 hours per week for a total of 30 hours.
The cost for the permanent part-tine position including benefits
is approximately $12,498.
A full-time bailiff will be used to remain in the court during
hearings and trials. When court is not in session, this individual
will perform warrant service to relieve the Police Department of
using permanent duty officers. Cost of the bailiff for 40 hours
per week including benefits is approximately $17,717 for five
months.
y
i
AgoidaNo _WL:V-1 a
Agenda ftent_ -,P~a
Date
A permanent part-time prosecutor will be hired to represe ~
City in court of record proceedings. Essentially, this individu
will staff the night court and handle other court matters as
needed. The cost for this position is estii,.ated to be $14,269 for
30 hours per week including benefits.
To administer the preparation of cases for trial, two additional
court clerks will be needed. These individuals will be full-time
and work 40 hours per week. The cost for these two clerks
including benefits is approximately $18,842.
By law, the City must have a certified court reporter prepare
electronic transcripts of the hearings in any appellate matters.
The cost of using contract labor on an as needed basis is $3,000.
Total costs associated with this option are $116,877, less
anticipated revenue of five months is $101,917. leaving a deficit
of $14,960. These costs are reflected in Attachment 4.
Revenues are based on an estimate of current appellate activity.
Using a very conservative projection, it is estimated the City will
receive approximately $127,200. Another $77,400 will be generated
from conducting an arraignment/data certain process. This process
allows the Judge to charge a failuce to appear fine when
individuals do not show up for their court dates. Additionally,
the Judge has indicated an intention to increase parking fines and
fees which will generate another $40,000. The arraignment/date
certain process and the increase in parking fines and fees could
be implemented prior to the establishment of the court of record.
Total projected revenue on an annual basis would be $244,600. The
estimated revenue for the five month period the court of record
will operate is $101,917.
in the second year of the court's operation, supplies, personnel,
and overtime costs would be recurring expenses. The total cost for
those expenditures is $1730369, less the anticipated revenue of
$244,600, leaving a balance of $71,231.
Advantages/Disadvantages
The advantages and disadvantages for Option 3 are detailed in
Attachment 1. Advantages include the following.
Establishing the court of record to coincide with the opening of
the DMC is the most cost effective alternative. It allows for a
more effective use of space, provides adequate parking, and is more
convenient for our citizens. By operating the court in the evening
we will be bettor able to meet the demands of the court. Also,
procedurally, we will only need to change our operations one time
in the initial move to the DMC. Further, this will facilitate a
better utilization of our sound and recording equipment and allow
for conducting arraignments and collecting fines in the evening.
This option will create a positive cash balance for the five month
operating period.
AgendaNa _
~te
The disadvantages include a delay in implementing the cou
record »ntil May, 1994, more undesirable hours for City employee ,
and, the expenditure of funds for a secon9 court room in the
future. However, constructing the shell of the second court room
will save the City in phone and heating/air conditioning costs.
Also, it allows this area to be used in the interim until the
second courtroom is finished out.
Based on the Task Force presentation to the Council committee,
there is consensus for proceeding with this option. Please advise
if I can provide additional irformation.
Respectfully submitted,
Lloyd V. Harrell
City Manager
Prepared By:
Josef Portugal
Assistant to the City Manager
Art,%CHMENT AAgeodaNo s
Agenda Ilerr~
Date 4- 7 3
MUNICIPAL COURT OF RECORD a? V
OPTION 1
The new Municipal Court of Record will dictate that our existing
court, personnel, and operation will need to increase in its
function by 100%.
Option of the Municipal Court of Record assuues an implementation
date of January 1, 1994, and leased space to accommodate
operations.
9 Months 1 Year
Courtrooms (2) $ 61,600*
Construct 2 Courtrooms in lease space
of 4,400 square feet at Post Office
(utilities and cleaning included in
lease price. Furniture also included).
File System 110600
Recording & Sound Eauioment 12,500
Su ies 13,620 $ 18,160
Forms and Postage.
Rersonnel 118,486 $157,979
Judge (23 hrs/wk) (22,496)
Bailiff (40 hrs/wk) (31,890)
Prosecutor (30 hrs/wk) (25,684)
Court Clerk (2] (40 hrs/wk) (33,916)
Court Reporter (Contract) ( 40500)
overtime - Police 11,250 $ 15.0Q0
Total $229,056 $191,139
Projected Revenues 183,450 $244,600
Balance 45,606) $ 53,461
*Yearly cost required because of lease. Actual 9 month cost would
be approximately $46,200.
.f
i
✓s9
Agenda No
AgendaltoM
Date -9a--
Advantages: 'g J/
1. Implement the court of record at an earlier date.
2. Transfer furniture and equipment to Denton Municipal Complex
(DMC), approximately May, 1994, when DMC becomes operational.
3. Totally accessible for mobility impaired.
4. Cost of lease includes finish out of area to be used.
5. Established date for relocation of court operations.
Disadvantages:
1. Deficit for nine month operating period.
2. Leased facilities will not allow recovery of costs associated
with lease space.
3. Start up costs at DMC if you operate two courtrooms.
4. Shortest lease available is one year. Thus delay move to DMC
to January 1, 1995 or pay for unused space.
5. USDA is currently leasing 29,000 square feet at the Post
office until September, 1994.
6. Two moves will be required. Move to lease facility and then
relocate the court to DMC.
7. Court operations will be interrupted in the move to the lease
facility and then again when relocating to DMC.
8. Offices associated with the Court operation and the court
itself would be at two different locations.
I
a
4lwz-'
_a_- 61
,3i T AC Fl?I E Nilk"da
Date? -
MUNICIPAL COURT OF RECORD
OPTION 2
The new municia Court of onnell and perationowill ineed ito increase its function
court, pers
by 100%.
Option 2 of the Municipal Court of Re to d assumti an toimpleme
the ntation
date consistent with the apQ relon
munic hus, Courtisaoperation for Cfive months9(KayTt roughtheSeptembecosts ect the
5 Monthr, 1 ear
$ 71,087* $ 7,528
Courtroom
Construction of an additional courtroom
at the DMC equal to the courtroom now
under construction ($32.00 x 1,600 square
feet). Furniture and cleaning included.
11,600
F e system
,000
Recording _Equipment 4,000
70566 $ 18,160
Supplies
66,326 $1570979
Judge nn (23 hrs/wk) (120498)
Bailiff (40 hrs/wk) (17,717)
Prosecutor (30 hrs/wk) (14,269)
Court Clerk [2) (40 hrs/wk) (13,000)
Court Reporter (Contract)
6,250 $ 15.000
r+~or1ime - Police
Total $1661829 $198,667
Projected Revenues $101,917 $244,600
Balance 640912) $ 45,933
*This cost includes $51,200 for construction, $16,750 for
furniture, and $3,137 for operations and maintenance.
w+rm*~
ApendaNo
Agendaltem,~--~-- -
Wte 9- 9.3
Advantages.
1. Begin court of record with the opening of the DMC.
2. Two courtrooms built initially.
3. Adequate parking.
4. Change schedule and procedures for court operations only once.
5. Court Offices and Court Room in the same location.
i
Disadvantaaes
1. Construction cost associated with a second court room.
2. Deficit for six month operating period.
3. Inefficient use of offices (2 Judges and 2 Prosecutors).
4. Increased 0 & M costs.
5. Delay implementation until May, 1994.
III
tl
arr.1CILXE'41 c Ag9Add(V0 2~.__,
Agenda l ffL--&* Date
MUNICIPAL COURT OF RECORD
OPTION 3
The new Municipal Court of Record will dictate that our existing
court, personnel, and operation will need to increase its function
by 100$.
Option 2A of the Municipal Court of Record assumes night time
operations and an implementation date constistent with the
approximate relocation to the Denton Municipal Complex (DMC) in
May, 1994. Thus, the court would actually operate for five months
c(May for three ecourtTclerksy to additional admi i tr costs
arraignments land
cashier activities.
5 Months 1_ Year
File System $ 11,600
Recording Eauinment 40000
lies 7,566 $ 18,160
corms and postage.
Personnel E91826 $164,979
Judge (23 hrs/wk) (120498)
Bailiff (40 hrs/wk) (17,717)
Prosecutor (30 hrs/wk) (14,269)
Court Clerk (2) (40 hrs/wk) (18,842)
Court Reporter (Contr-.ct) ( 3,000)
Overtime - Clerks (3) ( 30500)
Overtime - Police 6.250 $ 15.0O0
Total $ 99,242
$198,139
Projected Revenue $101,917 $244,600
Balance $ 2,675 $ 46,461
AgeedeNo
AgendaIIe~
Date ' 7 3
Advantages: 9~.3
1. Begin court of record with the opening of the DMC.
2. Positive cash balance for the six month operating period.
3. Arraignment/cashering activities will be conducted during
evening hours.
4. Most cost effective option (one time O 5 M).
5. Better utilization of space. Offices and Courtroom at the
same location.
6. Adequate parking.
7. Change procedures and schedules only once.
S. Easier to schedule for microphones and recording equipment.
9. More convenient for citizens since night court will be
operational.
Disadvantages:
1. Delay implementation until May, 1994.
2. More undesirable hours for City employees.
3. Will be required to spend funds for a second courtroom
sometime in the future.
ATTACMEVT R~eRdaAb
Agenda lteRt,
Date
MUNICIPAL COURT OF RECORD
OPTION 3 REVISED
Option 3 of the Municipal Court of Record assumes night time
operations and an implementation date consistent with the
approximate relocation to the Denton Municipal Complex (DMC) in
May, 1994. Thus, the court would actually operate for five months
(May through September).
Courtroom $ 270385* $ 3,230
Construct 40'x40' shell of a second
courtroom (1,600 square feet).
File System 11,600
Recording Equipment 4,000
Supplies 7,566 $ 18,160
Forms and postage.
Personnel 66,326 $151,979
Ju ge (23hrs/wk) (12,498)
Bailiff (40hrs/wk) (17,717)
Prosecutor (30hrs/wk) (14,269)
Court Clerk [2] (40hrs/wk) (18,842)
Total $1160877 $173,369
Projected Revenue $101,917 $244,600
Balance $ 140960 $ 71,231
*This cost includes $24,540 for the construction, $1,345 for
operations and maintenance, and $1,500 for furniture for the
prosecutor.
Advantages:
1. Begin court of record with the opening of DMC.
2. More effective use of space, provides adequate parking, and
is more convenient for citizens.
3. Change procedures and schedules only once.
Agenda NO
~
Agendaltez ~
9
Date
4. Arraignment and cashiering activities will conducted during `
evening hours.
Disadvantages:
1. Delay implentation until may, 1994.
2. More undesireable for City employees.
9. Will be required to spend funds for a second courtroom
sometime in the future.
x
D HANDOUT TO COUNCIL 9-7-93
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON. TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE 1817) 566.8307
Office of the City Mansger
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Members of the city council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
DATE: September 7, 1993
SUBJECT: Recycled Paper Costs
This is in regard to a request for information concerning current
recycled paper usage and costs.
Staff has determined that there are only two departments using
recycled paper exclusively. Both Keep Denton Beautiful and the
Fire Department are using recycled paper for office purposes,
primarily for copying. Each purchases approximately one case per
month. A case equates to ten reams (500 sheets per ream) or 5,000
sheets of paper. Current pricing for regular paper is $21.75 per
case and for recycled paper is $26.50 per case. The total annual
costs for the two departments is $636.00 using recycled paper and
$522.00 for regular paper. The cost differential for using
recycled paper is $114.90 per year.
Previously, the Planning Department conducted an experiment using
recycled paper and two-sided copying. A Planning and Zoning agenda
was printed using a ream of recycled paper in a Xerox 5053 copier.
There were no adverse effects using the recycled paper for copying
although the two-sided copying process involved more time and
labor.
A City Copier Task Force will be sending a report to the Council
in the near future. Among the recommendations is a suggestion to
develop a City wide policy on the use of recycled products.
Please advise if I can provide additional information.
Respectfully submitted,
(AL 6! Wit
L y V. Harrell
City Manager
t
HANDOUT TO COUNCIL 9-7-93
1993-94 MAJOR BUDGET ISSUES
GENERAL FUND
1. General Fund Reserve Level
2. Revenues
a) property tax
b) sales tax
c) ambulance fees
d) park and recreation fees
3. Pay Plan Adjustments
a) salary adjustments
b) incentive plus
4. Benefits Adjustments
a) health insurance
b) T.M.R.S. adjustment
c) tuition reibursement
5. Positions
a) Martin Luther King recreation center staffing
6. Other Agency Contributions (Human Services)
7. Transportation (SPAN & Handihop)
8. Tax Exemption For Persons Over 65
9. Fire Reserve Fund
10. Street Improvements
11. Legal Assistance
a) zoning
b) employee relations
12. Court of Record
13. Library Funding
14. Poison Control Funding
15. Police/Fire Communications Equipment
{
1993-94 MAJOR BUDGET ISSUES
UTILITIES
1. Electric
a) rates (3.2% increase)
b) positions
2. Water
a) rates (4% increase)
b) positions
3. Wastewater
a) rates (13% increase)
b) positions
4. Sanitation
a) rates ($.50 increase)
b) positions
c) recycling
> recycling coordinator
> maintenance worker 11
> cardboard recycling
> yard waste/composting
> plastics recycling
> cable T.V. network
> waste oil collection
> recycling site expansion
i
I
i
MAJOR BUDGET ISSUES REPORT
ON THE
1993.94
PROPOSED BUDGET
SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 29, 1993
"DEDICATED TO QUALITY SERVICE"
Uoyd V. Hens, City Monepw
John A McGrano, Exocutivo Obector of FloOnce
CITY ofVFNTONrTEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 7620) / TELEPHONE(817)566.8200
June 29, 1993
TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITIZENS OF DENTON:
This report highlights the maior issues affecting the 1993.94 budget which will be submitted
to Council by the end of July. It follows the same format used in prior years. Within each fund is
delineated a statement of the issues, alternatives for dealing with the Issues, and recommendations
from staff.
The 1993.94 operating budget will still feel the pressures that have affected the past several
budgets. Although the slow economic recovery Is beginning to be felt and is helping to alleviate some
of these pressures, ad valorem tax values continue to decline. Since tax value increases lag behind
economic growth, the 1993-94 proposed budget was still challenging to prepare.
The pent up demand that had to be put on hold over the last several years could only be
marginally addressed in certain areas. Overall, the 1993-94 budget could be classified as a
maintenance budget that only marginally addresses service level weaknesses.
In the proposed budget, all funds Incorporate revenues of $137,618,411 with expenditures
totalling $135,966,892. It was difficult to provide funding for services because of limited increases
' in revenues. With these factors in mind, the proposed budget was established in accordance with the
philosophy of maintaining the City's fiscal integrity, limiting reductions in current levels of services, and
prioritizing major areas of concern is Indicated by the City Council budget priorities questionnaire.
MAJOR ISSUES - OENERAL FUND
1. GENERAL FUND RESERVE LEVEL • Over the years, the City Council has followed a
policy of maintaining a General Fund unreserved balance for unforeseen emergencies that may arise.
The adopted goal has been to maintain this balance between eight (8%1 to ten 110%) percent of
General Fund expenditures. During last year's budget discussion, the City Council stated a strong
Major Budget Issues Report to Mayor and City Council
June 29, 1993
,
preference for a fund balance of ten (10%) percent. The balance at the end of 19931994 Is projected
to be ten point thirteen (10.13%) percent.
Below is a listing of the unreserved balances for the past three years, a projected balance
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and the proposed balance for the fiscal year ending
September 30, 1994.
GENE LFUND
As of As of As of Estimated Proposed
9130190 9130191 9130192 9130193 9130194
Unreserved Balances $3,894,094 $3,766,689 $3,074,588 $3,519,414 12,991,982
% of Total Expenditures 14.54 - 13.70 10.83 12.42 10.13
With the reserve level above ten (10%) percent, and a decrease in the assessed valuation,
the proposed budget utilizes $527,432 of the unreserved balance. This use will reduce the projected
unreserved balance to ten point thirteen (10.13%) percent of total expenditures.
The ah m&Ws relating to the unreserved fund balance level are;
1. Allow the balance to stay at its current level and find an additional $527,432 of {
revenue, or decrease expenditures.
2. Use $527,432 of the balance as a resource to help fund the 1993.94 budget. i!
11
3. Reduce the fund balance below the ten point thirteen (10.13%) percentlevel and utilize
the additional funds to offset other revenues or fund additional expenditures.
Recommei Staff recommends utilizing $527,432 of the unreserved balance to help
balance the 1993.94 budget.
2, REVENUES • The next major budget issue deals with General Fund revenues.
,
A. Property Tax - The largest revenue source of the General Fund is the ad valorem tax.
The preliminary tax roil, submitted by the Denton Central Appraisal District, shows a decline
of $24,853,061 from the 1992.93 fiscal year final roil, including supplements, Discussion
with the Appraisal District Indicates that taxpayer appeals may cause an additional
downward adjustment of four (4%) to five (5%) percent.
2
fi.
Major Budget Issues Report to Mayor and City Council
June 29, 1993
To compensate for the loss in value, the proposed 1993.94 budget sets the tax rate
at the effective rate level, the level required to produce the same amount of property tax revenue as
in 1992.93. Based on the preliminary roll, with no appeals, the rate would be 53320 per 1100
valuation compared to the current rate of $.7180. If an additional reduction of four (4%) to five (5%)
percent occurs, a tax rate of $.71328 to 53709 may be required. Certified assessed values ire due
from the appraisal district on July 27th. Setting the tax rate at the effective rate level will produce the
same revenues as last year and will not cover any increases for Inflation, salary adjustments, or any
new demand for services. If approved by the Council, this would be the fourth straight year that the
tax rate has been set at or below the effective rate.
The a/brnatfvos for the ad valorem tax rate are:
1. Keep the rate at the current amount of 53180. This would require a reduction
of $258,355 in the General Fund expenditures, plus an amount to be determined
after appeals are heard by the appraisal district.
2. Set the tax rate at the effective rate. Based on the preliminary
roll, this would set the rate at $3320 per $100 valuation plus an
amount to be determined after the appeal process.
3. Increase the actual rate over the effective rate. Every additional
$.01 increase over the effective rate will generate an additional
$183,111 in revenues that can be used to fund unmet budget
needs or restore services that have been eliminated.
Recommmendodon: Staff recommends setting the tax rate at the
effective tax rate level. Because of Council's desire to limit tax
increases, the proposed budget Is based on the effective tax rate.
0. Select Tax • The second major revenue source of the General Fund Is sales tax receipts.
The budget Includes a three 13%) percent growth In receipts over the current budget
amount. Sales tax collections through May were ten point eighty-eight 00,88%) percent
over prior year collections for the same period. A portion of this increase Is due to the
January 1, 1993, repeal of the sales tax exemption on residential gas and electric
customers. Each additional one 0 percent growth In the sales tax receipts generates an
additional $82,000 of revenue.
3
Major Budget Issues Report to Mayor and City Council
June 29, 1993
~j
The alternatives for sales tax receipts are;
1. Project less than a three (3%) percent growth.
2. Project a three (3%) percent growth for 1993-94. 01
3. Project greater then a three (3%) percent growth. bt
Recommendstlon: Staff recommends that a three (3%) percent sales
tax growth rate be used in bMancing the 1993.94 budget.
Rti~
C. Ambulance Fees • The fire department has reviewed the fee structure and billing
process for the charging of ambulance fees. Based on their analysis, the 1993 cost for
transporting a patient by the emergency medical service (EMS) was 0363.50 per incident.
Currently the base rate for transports to a Denton hospital is 0120 per incident. Under the
current fee structure a subsidy of 0243.60 is needed to provide for ambulance seryics.
Based or an area survey, an Increase in fees to 0200 per transport would be in line with the
charges of other area providers. The survey of area providers Indicates a range of 065 to
0402 with an average of 0219.86. In order to recover sk-me of the cost for ambulance
service, the budget incorporates an ambulance fee of 0200.00. Also, any supplies used
during the transport would be charged to the individual.
The alternatives for increasing the ambulance fees are:
1. Leave the fee at 0120. An additional 0100,000 of revenue
Increases or expenditure reductions would be required.
2. Increase the fee to 0363.60. This would provide for full recovery
of costs.
3. Raise the fee to recover some of the subsidized costs.
Recommendodon: Staff recommends that the fee be increased to 0200
which Is competitive with other local providers.
D. Park and Recreetfon Fees - With the anticipated completion in the fall of the softball
fields and soccer fields at North Lekes Park, a major issue regarding lighting r,nd field
maintenance arises. It is projected to cost 017,000 per year to light the new fields and
062,000 to maintain them. In preparing the budget it was recommended that the leagues
utilizing athletic fields pay for the cost of lighting. If the teams were to pay for the lighting,
4
Major Budget Issues Report to Mayor and City Council
June 29, 1993
the Parks and Recreation Department would charge each participant three dollars and fifty
10.501 cents per season. If the maintenance expense were allocated as well, $62,000, or
twelve dollars and fifty ($12.501 cents per participant/per season would be required.
The altarnoWes for charging a fee for field lighting are:
1. Do not charge a fee. This would require an additional $17,000 of
revenue Increases of expenditure reductions to be found.
2. Split the additional costs between the taxpayers (maintenance) and
the participants (lighting).
3. Charge a fee for both the additional maintenance and lighting expenses.
Recommendation: Staff recommends that a fee be charged for the use
of lighted fields. This will coincide with the adopted recreation fund
philosophy that specialized or specific use programs pay for all or part
of the cost of the program where feasible. Maintenance costs would
continue to be paid by taxes.
3. PAY PLAN ADJUSTMENTS • In 1989, the City hired the consulting firm of William M.
Mercer, to review and make recommendations regarding its classification and compensation plan.
After three 131 years of stk ly, the compensation philosophy adopted by City Council was that the City
manage its compensation around market" salaries.
In the 1991.92 budget, the City was only able to implement Phase I of the
recommended pay plan adjustments because of budget constraints. Phase I (effective January 1,
19921 provided funds to bring any position which was below market up to the elghty (80%) percent
minimum level of the new salary structures, These adjustments affected twelve 0 2961 percent of our
employees. All other employees received a three (3%) percent salary adjustment with the commitment
that Phase II implementation would be considered in the 1992.93 Budget.
The 1992.93 budget could not allow for full implementation of Phase II of the
compensation plan. It did provide for reduced pay for performance Increases at an average Increase
of two point six 12.6%) percent.
The 199394 budget continues to implement Phase II of the pay plan but not at full
implementation. Because of limited funds, full implementation Is not feasible although the budget
5
f,,
Major Budget Issues Report to mayor and City Council
June 29, 1993 s'
(
one year's experience with the process, it was decided
attempts to continue toward that goal. After
to fine tune the methodology for pay plan adjustments. The adopted compensation philosophy is to
manage cround "market' salaries. Although the city has not been able to get to 'market,' it was c;
determined that a two (2%) percent range adjustment would be necessary to keep from falling further
behind.
The second area of compensation provides increases for pay for performance. The pay
for performance matrix has been redesigned to better tit the organisation by shrinking the number of
performance categories and quartiles. The PRI increases range from zero (0%1 percent to five point
five 15,5%) percent. The market adjustment plus the pay for performance would provide for an I
average increase of four point six four (4.64%) percent. These increases would b3 effective from s+
January to April depending on the pay plans Involved. Also, a total compensation increase of four
(4%) percent has been programmed for fire and police civil service employees to be effective January
e
1, 1994, I
The alfarnsdvea for the implementation of the compensation program
are:
1, fully implement Phase 11 of the compensation program. This would r
require an receive a six point four four 604%) percent Increase.mployee would
?I
2, Delay the compensation program and provide no increase in employee t
compensation. This would provide a budget savings of $603,000. S
3, Implement a range adjustment and performance based pay Increase. s
Aacommendao~o^: Staff recommends that because of delaying the I
implementation of the compensation plan in prior years and because
pay adjustments for the past two years have not kept pace with 4
Inflation, a moderate pay increase based on performance and market be 1
implemented.
P)
4. BENEFITS ADJUSTMENTS -There are two major benefit adjustment issues in the 1993-
94 budget. ;
A. Health Insursnce • The City anticipates an Increase of twenty 120%1 Percent in health
Insurance premiums, effective January 1, 1994, If the increase is larger than twenty (20%)
percent, an adjustment in the plan wail be required meaning higher deductibles, co-payments,
etc., for employees.
e
Major Budget issues Report to Mayor and City Council
June 29, 1993
The alternatives for the increase in health insurance costs ere:
1. Require the employee to pay the twenty 120%) percent increase
in rates. This would allow $229,000 to be reallocated in the
budget.
2. Fund a twenty (20%1 percent maximum increase and readjust the
plan design it the increase exceeds 20%.
Recommendadon: Since employees are already responsible for paying the current cost
and any increase for dependent coverage, it is recommended that a twenty 120%)
percent health insurance increase for the employee be funded.
B. T.M.R.S, Adjustment • The City currently contributes a percentage of onr,ual salary
to the Texas Municipal Retirement System for all city employees except firefighters. The
firefighters have their own Penslon Retirement System. The T.M.R.S. contributions are five
point seven six (5.76%) percent City and five (5%) percent employee, of which the City
pays both.
The contribution to the Denton Fire Pension Fund is nine 19%) percent City, nine (9%)
percent employee with the City paying five (5%1 percent of the employee's share. Thus,
the City pays a total of fourteen (14%) percent towards the firefighters pension
contribution.
When compared, there Is more than a three 13%) percent difference between the City
contribution for firefighters and all other employees. In addition, the City's level of
participation In TMRS is at the lowest level offered and is below that provided by many of
our neighboring cities, Because of these factors, an adjustment to T.M.R,S. contributions
leffective January 1, 19941 to six point seven six 16,76%) percent City, and six 16%)
percent employee, at a cost of $114,335 is proposed. The City would not fund the
additional employee increase of one (1 percent.
The proposed 1993-94 budget also includes provisions for an enhancement to
retirement eligibility requirements and for an employee to buy back prior military and public service
credits. By adopting these provisions, the City would be required to contribute a small additional
portion to the retirement system. The Human Resources Department projects the cost of this program
to be $34,620. The employee would be responsible for their own additional amount. The Human
7
Major Budget Issues Report to Mayor and City Council
June 29, 1993
F-
Resources Department contends that these enhancements could encourage long-term, more highly
compensated employees to retire thus lessening the City's total personnel costs.
r,
The alternatives for funding the T.M.R.S. adjustment are:
1. Continue the current program and contribution levels. This would a+
allow $148,955 to be reallocated.
2. Fund only the contribution Increase. This would allow for $34,620
to be reallocated. st
I
3. Fund only the enhancement, military credit and prior service buy
back provis ns. This would allow $114,335 to be reallocated. s1
t
4. Fund the contribution Increase and the program enhancements.
Recommendetyon. Staff recommends the funding of both the tit
contribution level increase and the program enhancements.
f
5. POSITIONS • For the first time In several years, the proposed budget does contain a few
new General Fund positions. These positions are on attempt to meet the additional requirements
brought on by new programs or additional requirements on e.dsting service levels. The positions can
be categorized Into one of three areas-, new programs; workload demand increases; or restructuring.
h
They are broken down as follows: "
8
Ma;or Budget Issues Report to Mayor and City Council
June 29, 1993
Net
Department! Full-Time
Position Division Equivalent Comments
Restructurina,
Warrant Clerk Municipal 0.0 Recent additional court processing
court requirements has lead to as
Increase In the court clerk's
workload. The Municipal Court
Clerk's office is eliminating funds in
temporary and overtime budgets to
offset the coat of the warrant clerk.
Library Clerk Il Library 1.0 The promotion of the Library
Director has left the Librarian III
position vacant. In order to most
the service demands on the library,
a restructuring of positions is
recommended. The Librarian III
position would be eliminated and
two Library Clerk II's and one
Library Page would be funded.
There will be no n6t coat Impact
from this restructuring.
Library Pape Library 1.0 (See Library Clerk III.
Receptionist Customer 0.0 This action takes the front desk
Service receptionist from a temporary to a
full time status. It is anticipated
that this action will help eliminate
the turn-over associated with this
position. There will be an offset by
reducing funding In the
tem"arylaeasonal category.
9
6
a
Major Budget Issues Report to Mayor and City Council W
June 29, 1993
Net ttt
Department/ Full-Time
Position Division Equivalent Comments
W
Public Information City Manager .00 The City has long recognized the
Officer need for an Information officer to
coordinate all the public relations for
the City. This funding ($20,000)
would allow for the General Fund to
utilize a portion of the Public
Information Officer currently funded
in utilities. No new position is
created, but a restructuring of
current responsibilities will take
place.
New Programs:
Building Facilities 0.5 The addition of the Denton
Maintenance Management Municipal Center will put an
Technician II additional workload on an already
overloaded staff. This position will
provide support for the four (4)
current positions that maintain
450,000 square feet of city c
buildings, This position will be tilted
upon the opening of the DMC.
Administrative Facilities 1.0 This position will assist the
Assistant I Management Superintendent of Facilities
Management in organizing and
monitoring on-going projects.
Light Equipment Park .5 With the opening of the new fields
Operator Maintenance and facilities at North Lakes Park an
additional field crew will be needed.
This field crew will be responsible
for 35 acres of athletic fields plus
450 parking spaces,
Seasonal Park .5 ISee Light Equipment Operator).
Groundskeeper Maintenance
10
5
i
Major Budget Issues Report to Mayor and City Council
June 29, 1993
Net
Deparimentil Full-Time
Position Division Equivalent Comments
N1w Positions:
Civilian Jailer Police 1.0 Current staffing (2 jailers) allows for
providing a Jailer 80 out of the 168
hours per week required. Three
additional jailers would be required
to staff the full 168 hours. This
position will allow for additional
hours for a jailer to supervise
Inmates.
Building Facilities 0.4 With the increases in city buildings,
Maintenance Management Including Fire Station x6, this
Technician It position will help maintain the
450,000 square feet of buildings.
This position is programmed to be
filled on April 1, 1994.
Secretary City .25 The Increased work load on the
Manager's office personnel has necessitated an
Office increase from part-time (314) to full-
time.
The alternedvas for the positions are,
1. Keeo current staffing levels. This would allow $145,474 to be
reallocated.
2. Fund the positions.
Raeemmondeg m, Over the past several years tight budgets have
caused Increasing work load pressures on the current staff. In addition,
new programs have been added which will also Increase the demand for
service. In light of the current fiscal restraints, staff recommends
limited new positions to meet these needs, and the restructuring of
existing funds where possible to address departmental needs.
6. OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS - The proposed budget increases the funding
level for the Human Services Agencies by two point five 12.6%1 percent from its current level. The
total amount proposed is 4117,305. The Human Services Committee received requests totalling
$554,734, Of these requests, the Committee recommended Community Development Block Grant
funding of $1C0,000 and General Fund funding of $148,300.
11
Major Budget Issues papon to Mayor and City Council
June 29, 1993
1993.94 HUMAN SERVICES FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS
'91-'92 '92-'93 '93-'94 '93-'94
AGENCY BUDGET BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMM.
Aid Denton 4 10,000 1 61000
Community Food Center 4 2,800 1 2,772 3,200 3,200
LrWsley Summer 19,265 15,000
Playground Frog.
Dent. Christ. Pre. 24,000
Denton ISO TRIPS 40,600 20,600
Denton City-County 14,000 13,860 15,000 15,000
Frad Moore Child Care 28,000 27,720 28,000 28,000
Friends of the Family 33,000 32,670 33,000 33,000
HOPE, Inc. 51000 4,960 5,000 15,000
HOPE, (Pilot Prog.) 24,960 16,000 23,000
Humane Society 9,000
Kids Place 10,000
Library 25,4L0 L{
Literacy for America 6,204
MHMR 24,838
MLK ASAS 15,083 13,626 18,126 15,000
Fred Moore Summer 91888 10,000
N. Texas Comm, Clinic 24,600 24,000 95,000 35,000
PAL 15,000
RSVP 6,800 6,732 7,600 7,500
Salvation Army 30,000
Science Land 3,168
SPAN 26,000 25,740 26,000 26,000
TWU Cares 25,000 21,374 50,000
Owstey Services Prog. 26,556 20,000
COSO (shaded) t 89,523 4 75,000 4100,000
General Fund 4115,600 $114,444 4148,300
Total Funding 1205,123 4189,444 4248,300
Total Requests 1564,734
12
3
a
Major Budget lesvcs Report to Mayor and City Council
June 29, 1993
The alternatives for Human Services Agency are:
1. Fund at the 1992.93 level of 4114,444. This would allow
02,861 to be reallocated.
2. Fund at the agency request level of 0554,734. This would
require an additional 0337,429 to be funded from additional
resources or expenditure reductions.
3. Fund at the Human Services Committee recommended level.
This would require an additional 030,995.
4. Fund at a two point five (2.6%) percent Increase
which approximmes the Increase In other budgets.
Recommendation: Staff recommends the Increase of two point
five 12,6961 percent from current funding levels.
7. TRANSPORTATION - The proposed budget provides for a two point CA 12.6%1 percent
increase from current funding levels for SPAN (02481 and HANDI-HOP 101,1391 transportation
services. With the two point Eve (2,6%1 percent Increase, the total funding for transportation services
would be 08,827.
The altem Ms for transportation funding are:
1. Keep the funding it Its current level. This would allow $1,387 to
be reallocated.
2. Fund at a two point five 12.5%) percent increased level.
Rocom rendatlon: Staf'& recommendation is to fund at a two point
five (2.6%) percent Increased level.
8. TAX EXEMPTION FOR PERSONS OVER 89 • In the 1988.89 budget, the City Council
agreed to help individuate on fixed Incomes absorb any additional property tax increases. At the time,
Council established a goal of raising the ovar 65 exemption from 018,000 to 125,000. The current
exumption for persons over 65 is 120,000. Increasing the exemption by 01,000 to 021,000 is
recommended in the proposed 1993-94 budget. Lost year, because of fiscal restraints, the 01,000
Increase in exemption was not granted. Exclusive of lost year, a similar Increase hog been granted In
each of the budget years since 1988.89.
13
I
Ma)of Budget issues Aeport
June to Mayor and City Council
29, 1993 IN
11
The dtwrradves for the over 65 tax exemption are:
1 Do nothing, Leave the exemption It the current amount of $20,000
and utilize an additional $18,302 for other purposes.
2. increase the exemption to $26,000 Immediately and eliminate $73,208
of expenditures from the budget or increase revenues,
3. Proceed with of the goal of Increasing the exemption by 11,000 per
year, for c total exemption of 021,000 in 1993-94.
ReromnmandaNora; Staff's recommendation Is to Increase the exemption
11,000 for the 1993.94 fiscal year,
9. FIRE RESERVE FUND • Over the poet several years, a fire reserve fund has been built to
phase In the fiscal Impact of opening a new fire station. Within the 1991.92 budget, a plan was
developed to use the reserve funds over the next several years. The 1993.94 budget Incorporates that
strategy and uses 0137,000 of the reserve balance of 0382,300 to offset 1993.94 expenditures
required for opening Station x6.
10. STAF
ET IMPROVEMENTS
The Council
constructing/rebuilding to be one of the to budget questionnaire showed street
the Street Department of $1,569,210 will Allow sforrfothe ur Clane c'miles rof new constructiionsand
reconstruction of 160,000 square yards or about one hundred and twenty 020) blocks of streets.
Because of the limited resources, the 1993.94 budget could not provide additional
funding for street construction/repair with current revenues, An alternate resource that could Increase
the funds available Is a Solid Waste User Fee. Prior to the City taklog over exclusive co%ction of solid
waste, s license fee of eight (896) percent was paid by the private contractors. Because of the use
of City streets for collec iCh sorvices, a user fee could be assessed to the Sanitation Fund. A typical
fee would be in the throe ;3%) to five (6%) percent range. If a three (3%) percent of gross revenues
user fee was Instituted, then 0124,845 would be realized In the General Fund. These funds could then
be allocated to the Street Department for additional street construction/repair, The City Engineer
estimates that with these funds an additional two and one-half 12 1/2) miles of resurfacing could be
Implemented. On an average shed residential street this would allow for thlrty-seven (37) additional
blocks of streets to be reconstructed.
The afbmatlws for street Improvements ere;
1. Leave funding at current level,
14
Major Budget Issues Report to Mayor and City Council
June 29, 1993
2. Charge a three (396) percent user fee for solid waste collection and allocate those
funds to street ccnetructionirepairs.
Recommendablam Staff recommends the Initiation of a three (3%) percent user fee to
be used to maintain and repair city streets.
11, LEGAL ASSISTANCE -Two (2) major issues dealing with legal issues are addressed In the
1993.94 budget. The first attempts to address the workload associated with employee relations and
civil service matters. The budget includes a package for retaining outside counsel to deal with these
Issues. The cost of the package Is 028,000 and provides for two hundred and seven (2071 hours of
legal services, With the funding of this service, the City Attorney's staff will be able to concentrate
on other City btu: a teas.
The second Issue deals with the preparation of the new zoning ordinance. A 120,000
package is Included to hire outside counsel with expertise in the zoning field. The rewrite of the Zoning
Ordinance will help implement the recommendations of the Land Use Task Force and help the zoning
process become more user friendly. The present Zoning Ordinance has not been comprehensively
revised since 1968.
A/rwnedwa to legal assistance ere:
t. Fund the packages for outside legal assistance. This allows for legal assistance
requiring personnel civil service and zoning issues,
2. Eliminate the packages for legal assistance. This would allow 048,000 to be
reallocated, but would make it very difficult to implement the new zoning
ordinance and would delay the resolution of personnel Issues.
Recommend#Vw: Staff recommends funding of the two 12) legal assistance packages.
MAJOR ISSUES - UTILITIES
The proposed Utility Operations Budget for 1993.94, as reviewed and recommended by the
Public Utility Board, allocates total revenues of $4,634,000 and expenditures of 195,694,000. The
revenues are based on a three point two (3,296) percent Increase In e,.ctric rates, a four (4%) percent
Increase In water rates and a thirteen 113%) percent Increase In wastewater rates. The Solid Waste
rates are proposed at a 11.60 per month residential Increase, an eight 18961 percent commercial rate
Increase, and a 1.60 per cubic yard landfill disposal Increase The net amount of these rate changes
is anticipated to increase an average residential customer's monthly utility bill by 15,89, of by four
point six three (4.6396) percent,
15 ~I
i`
Major Budget Issues Report to Mayor and City Council
June 29, 1993
r.
rA `i
ELECTRIC SUMMARY
ei
The Electric Department proposed 1993.94 budget assumes total KWH sales of 815,617,000.
This equates to a four point three 14.3%1 percent increase over estimated sales for the current year,
The proposed 1993.94 budget assumes total revenues of $69,108,000 and expenditures of
188,982,000. This comps,es to the current year adopted budget of 182,817,000 In total revenues a1
and 182,572,000 In expenditures. 1
ii
Rates • The 1993-94 proposed budget assumes a three point two 13.2%1 percent Increase in
electric rates. The rate Increase is composed of an ovorall two 12%1 percent base increase and on
Energy Cost Adjustment (ECA) of .10 per KWH, The average customer can expect a mont'nly Increase s~
of 11,98,
i
New Positions • Three (3) positions in the Electric Department are being deleted, two 12)
production plant operations/maintenance trainees and one (1) metering utility service worker. 1
r
WATER SUMMARY R{
+i
The proposed 1993.94 Water Department budget Is based on projected water sales of 4.185
billion gallons. Total proposed revenues ror 1993.94 are 113,826,000 compared to a current budget
of 113,009,200. Total proposed expenditures for 1993.94 are 113,458,000 as compared to the VI
112,948,000 budget for 1992.93. 1.
Rata - The proposed 1993.94 Water Department budget recommends a four 14%) percent
Increase in rotes. The Increase will produce an additional 1532,000 In revenues. An average customer
(8,600 gallons/month) will see a monthly increase of 11,17 (from 129.20 to 130.37).
New Positions - The 1993.94 Water Department budget adds one(1) new position, a part-
time lab asslst:nt. The budget deletes the full-time construction manager position,
18
egM i
Major Budget Issues Report to Mayor and City Council
dune 29, 1993
WASTEWATER SUMMARY
The 1993.94 Wastewater Department budget is based on the collection and treatment of three
point five zero four 13.504) billion gallons of wastewater. Total revenues are projected at 18,607,000
and total expenditures at 18,067,000.
Rates • The proposed 1993.94 Wastewater Department budget recommends a thirteen 113%)
percent Increase in rates. An average wastewater residentlal customer 16,100 gallons/month) would
have a monthly Increase of 12,16 (from 116.69 to 118.76).
New Positions • No new positions are Included In the Wastewater Department budget. One
(1) temporary part-time position was deleted in the pre-treatment area,
SANITATION SUMMARY
The 1993.94 Solid Waste Department budget assumes total revenues of 15,094,000 and
000 in
i res of 15,087,000. This compares to the current year adopted budget of 14,373,
expend to .94,
ra snues, and expenditures of 14,236,000, Net Income Is projected to be $7,000 for 1993
Rates • A 1.60 per month Increase Is proposed for residential customers, Increasing the
monthly charge from 910.65 per month to 111.15 per month. There is an eight 18%) percent Increase
for commt,rcial customers and a 9.60 increase per cubic yard for landfill disposal (13.45 to 13.96).
Special collection of residential yard waste Is planned for once a week pick-up (Wednesday).
The planned policy is to collect up to six (6) bags of leaves and g(saa clippings per week free of
charge. Any amount over the six (6) bag limit will be charged 1.60 per bag. One cubic yard of brush
will also be picked up, at no charge, once a week with an additions; 14.00 per cubic yard for each
additional cubic yard of brush. These increases in yard waste collection fees will be used to cover the
cost of new recycling programs.
New Positions • Solid Waste has requested seven 17) new positions; one (1) In the Residential
Div(elon (utility tech for billing collection and anstyslall two (2) in the Commercial Division ions driver
and a second supervisor); one 111 In the Disposal Division (state mandated landfill Inspector); and, three
(3) in the new Recycling Division (one recycling coordinator, one heavy equipment operator to run the
17
apt
Major Budget Issues Report to Mayor end City Council I
June 29, 1993
brush grinder, and one (I I maintenance worker 11 for in-house recycling and commercial waste paper al
i
collection). i
RECYCLING - The 1993.94 Solid Waste budget Includes several packages for additional f►i
recycling programs. They are as follows:
e Recycling Coordinator (144,748) - This position will be r ,,r,onsible for the administration,
coordination and promotion of the City's recycling and waste minimization program. This
program will not involve the employment of a new person: but rather the Community
Improvement Coordinator will be transferred from the Planning Department and will be
asked to assume these responsibilities.
e Maintenance Worker 11 1$29,2271 - The establishment of this position will help the City
comply with Senate Bill 1340 relative to In-house recycling of all white ledger paper,
computer print-out paper, cardboard and aluminum.
a Cardboard Recycling 1$32,9741 - This program allows the City to initiste a cardboard
recycling program In the buslnesslcommorcial area.
e Yard Woste/Composting 1184, 6501 - This program provides for the separate collection of
brush from that of grass and leaves clippings, Once collected, the material brush will be
chipped and the grass/leaves debagged and prepared as a bulking agent for composts-,g
at the Wastewater Treatment Plant,
e Plastics Recycling ($38,934) - This package will allow the City to include plastics as a
recycling item. Collection will be provided at the current recycling centers,
e Cobh 7,V. Network: SwWReuse Program 115,6001 - This program provides funding for
supplies and program promotion by volunteers to coordinate the swaptrouse network.
Under this program, businesses and Individuals that have useful but no longer needed
Items will be able to advertise on the Government Access Channel Bulletin Board.
Products will be limited to those items not for sale.
e Waste OtlCollectlon (19,9001- This program will establish two (2) used oil collection sites
at the McCormick and East McKinney fire stations. The program attempts to eliminate the
Improper disposal of waste oils.
• Recycling Site fxpenslon (125,280) - This program provides for two 121 additional
recycling sites In the northeast and southwest areas of the City.
I8
ka:r.Nar
4Y.p 1 L
Major Budget Issues Report to Mayor and City Council
June .9, 1993
If you should desire any additional Information, or have any quesitons with regards to the
budget process or contents of this report, either myself or the staff are ready to assist y U.
loyd . Harratl
City Manager
AttwMn~nt~
i ,
A
-d
19
Attachment A
CRY OF DENTON
GENERAL FUND RANKING OF
SUPPLEMENTAL PACKAGES
1983-94 PROPOSED BUDGET
1 slow Yaw 1 Yw I Yw 4` Year 3 1
6•Wph Orces _0 Nat No knpact impatd
Puke" owl Supp Pkg Pa Alter Agar Altar Alter
Rank Two Melon T Arnow Rap OffMU Transfers Tr&Wws Transfsfars
SUPPLEMENTAL PACKAGES PROPOSED FOR 1993-94.
8.0000 Side BO" MOww Dralnage Water N 51410 0.0 0 0 0 0
6.0000 Weed Cor-trot Drainage WaIK N 24,674 0.0 0 0 0 0
8.0000 ToMwaryIS"wal Position Drainage Water N 22,083 0.0 0 0 0 0
8.0000 Mowing Dralnage Water N 101888 0.0 0 0 0 0
8.0000 Motor Pool Savings Polka Police A 18,133 0.0 0 0 0 0
8.6760 Refurbish 2706 Englnew St Comet N 10,982 0.0 0 0 0 0
8.6750 Mount Water Tank t0 2670 Engineer S1 Cone N 71200 010 0 0 0 0
5.6750 Aetors Utlilty Funds FacMgt FacMgt P 8,000 0.0 8,000 7,014 7,014 7,014
5.8750 Warrant Clerk Finance MunlCr1 N 21,796 0.0 0 0 0 0
8,8760 Up-Grade PC Finance Accting N 976 0.0 978 0 0 0
51760 Medical Director Fire EMS P 8,000 0.0 0 0 0 0
5.8750 Library Clerk II Library Supp,Swv N 36,666 2.0 0 0 0 0
5.8750 Vehicta Replacement Ptanning Inspection N 4,210 0.0 31312 3,333 6,186 6,186
5.7500 Notice 2862 Engineer St. Patch N 6,402 0.0 0 0 0 0
5.7500 Refurbish Existing Vehicles Engineer St. Patch N 7,751 0.0 0 0 0 0
6.7500 New 12 cu. yd. Dump Truck Englnew St Const N 61580 0.0 0 0 0 0
8.7500 New Vehicle 2611 Enginew St. Patch N 41626 OA 0 0 0 0
5.7500 Replace 2620 Englnew St. Patch N 1,626 0.0 0 0 0 0
5.7500 P49160126W Engineer St. Patch N 6,006 0.0 0 0 0 0
5.7500 Library i1age Library Supp,Sarv N 16,0102 1,0 0 0 O 0
5.7143 Wang (P;-321)Cornputer Englne& Enginw N 2,532 0.0 0 0 0 0
5.6250 electric Power AtrW Airport R 1,000 0.0 11000 1,000 1,000 1,000
5.5000 PC to Mainframe Flvance Purchasing N 600 0.0 800 446 0 0
5.5000 Aecepllonl$t Finance Oust Swv N 41666 0.0 0 0 0 0
8.5000 Legal Assistance HumRea HumRse N 26,000 0.0 28,000 11,024 11,024 11,024
5.3750 ReplaceVehiclA 1150 Engines Enginew N 11314 010 561 $29 2,484 2,466
5.3760 Overtime Finance Tax N P22 0.0 622 422 622 622
5.3750 C tulting S61*44 Info.S&v Admin R 24,000 0.0 24,000 4,723 4,723 4,723
5.3760 Prinler Malnlinafte Legal Legal R 360 010 380 263 283 283
5.2500 DMCOperationafMatntenance FacMgt FecMgt N 68,475 2.0 518,476 60,032 60,032 60,032
5.2500 Increase CYA Eliot. Funds FacMpt FwMgt N 9,400 0,0 9,400 4,241 8,241 6,241
5.2500 06ase, IV Finance Purchasing N 600 010 600 334 0 0
5.44 Wate(isoW Servtee Firs Admin P 61500 0.0 0 0 0 0
54500 Wellness Awarenaa Program HumRes HumRea N 19,000 0,0 10,000 7,480 7,480 7,480
5.1250 Phone-Long Distance Flnana In1.Audil N 200 0.0 200 109 109 109
5.1260 Zoning Ordinance Legal legal N 20,000 0,0 20,000 14,684 0 0
5.0000 Ambulance Rsfurblahing Fire EMS N 17,500 0.0 17,500 17,500 0 0
5.0000 Overtime Legal Legal R 300 0.0 3OG 223 223 223
6.0000 Rest. Aduh Book Collection Library Adult Seat R 14,528 0.0 14,528 14,528 14,528 14,528
4.6750 Customer Service Finance Net Swv N 51906 0.0 51906 0 0 0
4.6760 Tools (of Fire Invaelgations Fire Prevention N 4,060 0,0 4,000 4,060 0 0
4.6760 AFT SOCUAVY t0 AFT OM Govt OM Govt N 6,464 0.25 8,484 5,545 4,144 1,635
Attachment A, con't.
CITY OF DENTON "
GENERAL FUND RANKING Of
SUPPLEMENTAL' PACKAGES
1499-04 PROPOSED BUDGET
t■LoM Yet 1 You 1 Yw 9 Yw 3
8" ° QroM ! Not Net knoct. knpo
packs" Deft. BuPCPke Pbs After ARK AMt' ARM
Rinlr Tkh D*t D AkA TYPO AtOUnt Alki Ofbels TWWM Truafara Translate
SUPPLEMENTAL PACKAGES PROPOSED FOR I9W94.
4,7500 Surface Prop, Equipment Englrw TruM. N 1,212 0.0 712 712 2,424 2,424
4.7600 CMI Swvke Exams Finance Mlac R 116.40 0.0 18,803 15,263 15,285 15,269
4.7500 Copy Machine Finance MuniCA N 11400 0.0 700 700 1,400 1,400
4.7600 Budget Printing Finance Finance P 21687 0.0 21687 1,456 1,461 1,456
4.7600' OFOA Menbelrah1p Finance Finance N 106 010 103 57 67 67
4,7500 North Lakes Athlek Craws Parka Malntenan C 62,000 1.0 62,000 62,000 62,000 62,000
4.6250 Radio Equipmw,t Fite Admin. N 3,000 0.0 3,000 3,000 0 0
4.6260 Put Ile Into, Officer GM GeV, Gen Dow N 20,000 1.0 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
4.6260 Portable Comm. Equipment Police Police N 12,600 0.0 12,800 12,600 0 0
4.5714 Me 8 Dlagtwa lc lnlo.Serv Admin. N 11600 0.0 1,1100 1,123 66 58
4.6000 Telaphone Finance Treasury R 1,200 0.0 1,200 166 186 166
4.5000 Bldg Codes Sec. to Coy Planning InapWW N 151 0.0 161 148 0 0
4.5000 CMllan Jailers Police Pollee N 24,060 1.0 24,060 24,060 24,060 24,080
4.3750 TechnIcan it FacMgt FwMgt N 151301 LO 15,301 13,414 26,676 28,474
4,3750 Tuhlon Relmbureement 50% Finance Mist R 640 0.0 680 616 616 616
4.3750 Network Card Pfanning Inspection N 1,250 OA 1,250 1,236 448 446
4.2600 Travel and Saminar Lltltary Adult Sen. P 700 0.0 0 0 0 0
4.1250 ADA Renovations FwMgt Fsc Mo N 19,210 00 19,210 18,641 0 0
4.1260 Homawok Cenle Library Youth Swv N 11600 0.0 0 0 0 0
4.0000 Raelore Book Binding Fund Lbtary Supp.Swv P 1,482 0.0 0 0 0 0
3.8750 Raeloriag Bldg. 8 Equip. Fund Lbrary Admin P 7", 0.0 0 0 1 0
3.6260 Travel and Seminar Library Supp.Swv p 714 0.0 0 0 0 0
3,6250 Travel and Seminar Lbrary Youth Swv P 7,k0 0.0 0 0 0 0
11250 Adequate Nelwak Backup InfO.Sev Admin.Swv N 415!+0 010 4,600 41093 11676 1,678
30000 Ubtary Maintenance FUM91 FacMgl N 4,000 OA 0 0 0 0
Mowing - North Lakes pub Montanan C 13,500 2.0 131500 03,500 13,500 13,600
666,661 11,3 436,366 363,045 298,632 300,oro
Attachment B a~
I
CRY OF DENTON
GENERAL FUND RANKING OF a1
SUPPLEMENTAL PACKAGES 1
1OW04 PROPOSED BUDGET w
You 1 YW 1 YW a Yeas .
Lk Oro" s Net NM Imp4d ImDscl
%W Pkg Poe Afton ARM ARK Aftir i r
POP- Offsets TrMd9n Transfer TruulM sckktpt Amount Rsq OTHER SUPPLEMENTAL PACKAGES SUBM(RED FOR 1993-94.
8,
R 5,368 0.0 5,%8 4,932 4,932 4,932
4.1250 Tulllon RelmburNmeM 70M Finance Mies 1,906 273 273
0 0 WI
4.1250 Envelope Fs4dM fnfo•Serv dm1n.84rv N 2,096 0.0 2,096
0
Finance Cunt Sere N 3,200 0.0 3,200
4,0000 TOMTrelning 800 010 600 445 0 0
1.0000 TOM Training Plnanc4 Purchasing N 000 313 0 0
Finance Accting N 1Soo 0 0 1,263 1,149 0 0
4,0000 TOM Training
Inlo..Serv ,263
N 2,200 0.0 2,200 2,174 0 0
4,0000 Workstation safety Nulp. PlalMne nlnq w dplanning mning N
4 113 0 0
40000 Laptop Compute( Planning Inspection N 418 0.0 60
3,8750 Software N 3,000 0,0 3,000 31000 80 3.8671 P*rwal COmpU1M Pu09a judge Judge udge N 12,861 0.0 12,861 11,275 2,393
2,393
3.7500 One FwMgt FacM9tt N 800 0.0 800 800 0 0
Vehicle 3,7500 TOM Trainnin Finance
Treasury N 1,600 0.0 1,600 252 0 0
3.7500 TOM Training g Finance 9,704 0.0 9,704 8.626 9,ow 2,363
364 2,364
3 7518 R4ClaeaiftCatlOM Ol Positions IInfolerv nto S4rv dmin Serv N 1,000 0.0 4,000 2,364
3,7600 RaptacemonlTtpM Parka MainlMan N 8,435 0.0 8,435 8,436 3,250 3,250 ill
3.7600 Replace Rlq 03866 N 5.436 0.0 6,438 6,438 10.672 10,672
3.7500 10 Pasanget HandktP Van Parka Rec 7660 0.0 7860 7,860 150 150
3.7500 AutoCtd&AftdCsdd BOOM Puna dmin a 10,000 0.0 4,000 3,964 0 0
3.7500 Grant Historical Survey Planning Planning N 800 0.0 Boo 800 0 0
3.6250 TOM Training Finance Tax 11751 1,140 7,140 7,140
3.8250 Tult10-1 Retmtwreament W% Finance Mlac R 7,757 0.0 64 22,381 24,120
Finance Accting 0 54,883 1.0 ,883 25,894
3,x250 print Administrate Ftnarxe Purchasing N 490 0.0 490 272 0 0
3.8250 fi is Cabinet Finance IM.Audil N 1,000 0.0 1,000 547 0 0
i 186 1188
3.6260 TOM Training GM Go A GM 001A R 6,360 0.4 5,360 088
3.8260 Trawl Legal P 5,200 0.0 6,200 31871 0 0
3.8250 City law Leg" Malin 13,500 13,500 13.500
3.8250 RalltoTratUAlrpOr1M*w Parke nsw1on C 132, , 500 2,260 10.0 .0 132.,600 2,250 2,224 0 0
3.6250 TOM Trtlnln0 planning Inspection N
HumRN N 99,107 2.0 99,101 39,016 38,015 38,015
3,11000 TOM Program HumfMe N 83,097 2.0 83,097 32,115 28,006 8,
3.5000 Attorney d Stiff HumRM Humg4s 4.330 0.0 4,330 3,938 6,741 6,141
3.6000 Plc,n Paper Fax Info.SMv Admin.Sarv N 330 0.0 2.500 1,478 1,476 1,478
&WOO TOMTraining IM094rv Admin N 1,625 0.0 1,625 961 0 0
3,5000 Work 9tatlOn Safety Inf0.84rv dmin N 13,742 13,742 13,742 13.742 r~
3.6000 PNM.Part-TtmaAasl Judge Judge Judge N 13,742 0.6 23,700
3.5000 CM114n Duty ~ars 23,700 23,700 23,700
Police Police N 23,700 1.0 0 0
Planning lWe Iru0ltlion N 3tG 0.0 315 311
3486 Filing Cabinet 200 0.0 200 200 200 200
Airport AIrpOA N 080 1,060 1,080 1.060
3.3150 Petroleum 810(804 FIname Tax P 1,080 0.0 1.080
3.3A Postage Finance Tax N 2,110 0.0 2,110 2,110 2,110 2.110
3.3760 GNiCe &MOSS Mj%E0 MUD N 3,426 0.0 3,426 3,426 3.529 0 3,836
3.3750 APT-S4crstary Aim Alrport N 10,000 0.0 10,000 10000
3.2500 Fuel Tank Removal N 123,888 0,0 123,888 48,767 48,167 48,781
3.2500 EmPIOY08 WIll""Pro0ram HumRM ~ P 3.000 0.0 31000 2,630 2,830 2.830
3.1260 Ralor41nsect Funds FacMpl f
I >
n~E2~Chlnt Ur Wn't.
CRY OF DENTON
GENERAL FUND RANKING OF
SUPPLEMENTAL PACKAGE$
103-94 PROPOSED BUDGET
I.LOMr
YeM l YW 1 Yo& 2 s YW S
arm 0 Net I* lrnpacS h"a
package DIOL 81*0PkO Pot' A4Y Alter
Rank Title ARM ARM
DMstor1 T Amount OMs~ts ; TrxW * Trsmstue T & wom
OTHER SUPPLEMENTAL PACKAGES SUUVM FOR 1003-04,
3.1250 Rpic 3740 a 3760 w/ Mow Party Maintonan N 14,206 0.0 14,296 14,206 4,250 4,250
3.1250 Map File
Planning InpeatlOn N 320 0.0 320
3,0000 Clerk Typist HumRse HumRu N 17,006 1,0 17,406 6,7331 6.731 6,731
2,8750 Pwwal Computer Airport Airport N 4,100 0.0 41100 4,100 300 300
2,111 Refurbish PAWOn Airport Airport N 71000 010 0,000
26750 W-011 Unit Fire 6, 00 p 0
Opertllons N 1_,000 0,0 13,000 13,000 24,000 26,000 '
2.8750 IS UW Coordinator Inlo.Serv Admin N 48,573 1.0 44,373 4.712 28,712 28,712
2,8730 Shelving-Audio/Vlsusl library Supp.SW N 11770 0.0 11770 11770 n
2.6750 Clerk III Planning Inspection N 3,468 0.0 31486 31425 3,425 3 425
2.7500 Education Videos-Flre Prev. Fire Prevention N 1,410 0.0 1,410 1,410 0 0
2.7500 Intern HumRee HumRes N 6,606 05 0.8% 2,715 2,715 2,715
2.7500 COmmunica110ns 000001141' Inlo,Serv Adman N 3,572 0.0 3,572 2.111 142 142
2,7500 Plain Paper Fax Info.Serv Adman N 11900 0.0 1,900 1,123 1,123 1,123
2.7500 LAN Coordinator Info.Suv Admin.SW N 41,587 1.0 41,567 37,606 36,858 37,507
2.7300 MLK Equip 8 Furniture Party Rec N 20,366 0,0 26,386 28,365 0 0
2.7143 Point Cfty Hall FscMgt FscMgt N 24,000 0.0 24,000 ?1,041 0 0
2.6250 Fire Parking Lot FAI FscMgt N 61700 010 81700 7,627 0 0
' 2.8250 Secretary
2.8250 Median Bwutifkstlon Parks Malnlenan N 6,~ 01.0 P.m 23,80 ,430 ,181
a
.0 8,217 6,277 21,554 21,554
2.8250 Tactical Unit Equipment Police POfice N 3,726 0.0 3,725 3,725 O 0
2.5000 PC with PrinlM Finance In1.AudN N 6,868 0.0 6,658 3,843 198 196
2,5000 Recruitment Fire Adman N 9,680 0.0 0,860 0.680 0 0
2.5000 8r. Ctr, Furniture d Equip. Parks Rao N 25,061 C.0 25,081 25,081 0 0
2.5000 small Power Equipment Parke Malntenon N 61780 0.0 3,700 6.780 0 0
2.6000 PenonalComputer Planning Planning N 11998 0.0 1,096 1,078 0 0
2.5000 Den 00 Narcotic Tm k Force Police Police 0 48,809 1.0 12,203 12,203 12,203 12,203
2.3760 ODACMalnlenenoe FacAlul FacMgl N 46,400 0,0 48,400 40,679 0 0
2.3750 TOM Training Finance IntAudll N 2,000 0.0 21000 1,004 0 0
23750 Furnlturs/Audlo Visual Equip, Fire EMS N 10,866 0.0 1.,865 10,865 0 0
2.3750 Request for Wong PO Library Adult Sera N 2,650 0.0 21550 21650 132 132
2.3750 Ram Up-grade (0118) Planning Planning N 1,500 0.0 1,500 1,483 0 0
2,3750 Processor UP-1)(01414 (018) Planning Plsnning N 31500 010 3,600 3,480 u 0
2.3750 PC Hardware Update Police Nice N 1,976 0.0 11070 11070 0 0
2,2500 Materials TestingProg• Enginiar St. Patch N 10,000 0.0 10,000 0,392 1S8 188
22500 POWs Rig 03680 Mow Psha Mainlenan N 6,512 0.0 6,612 5,512 2,880 2,880
2.2500 Reclassifkltloru Parks Mointenan N 15,397 0.0 15,397 15,397 18,397 15,307
2-.500 RplsCO Rlg 03680 Mo%w Parks Malnlensn N 51512 0.0 51511 8,512 2,880 2,880
2.2600 0ISTraining+Membership Poann'W Planning N 380 0.0 680 H2 0 0
2.2500 018 Workstation Planning Planning N Epp 0.0 800 593 0 0
2.1250 Street Repairing Prog. EngImW 91 Conel N 250,000 0.0 250,000 234,850 0 0
2.1250 Advwvod ArCAnIo. Training Planning Planning N 2,491 0,0 2,497 2,468 0 0
2.0000Ir1arnalAuditor I Ansnf:e In1.Audl1 N 40,121 1.0 40,727 22,202 22,972 23,688
Attachment 8, con't, L,
14 11 1
Qt R FU;, S RANKING 0
1JFiiE.E PA01 AG
f 94lpd'0~Eb 6UD(E7
Y 1 Yea I yw ! Yw 3
Gross ! Not Nat Imps Wood
Supp pkQ Poi Ah1r After Awe ARK,
OMiW Trarl lhs Tranalen Translate
AAA
T Amaua
OTFIER BUMyI AL PACKAGES St d FOR 1 W3 94. • `
9.0000 EMS $ae SupV,Vehicle FIN EMS N 15,250 0.0 16,250 19,250 32,500 32,500
2,0000 Mowlnq - North takri Parka MtlntMan 0 13,600 0.0 13,500 13,500 13,600 13,500 sd
Police Police N 11,125 0.0 11,125 11,125 1,500 1,950
2.0000 Police K-9 Link
1.9750 Irttemat Auditor ASWI&ta FIr1Ma In6Audh N 26,972 1.0 28,972 11,759 15,220 15,706
Gen OVA OM 00'1 N 7,000 0.0 7,000 4,566 0 0 0.:
1.6750 chi:M Surwy 0.0 4,000 4,000 0 0
1.9760 Medlin Color Flowers Parka AtasntMan C 1,000 4 0
1.5760 wNlnaa Program Police Police N 4,600 0.0 ,60J 4,500 O
1.9750 Typewrites Police Police N 1,900 0.0 1,900 1,900 0 0 ,
1.6250 Clean Furniture FacMpt FacM01 N 5,000 0.0 5.000 4,364 0 0
1.5250 Enplno Tat OIa0n0allc Unh F1r4 Ad nin N 9,200 0,0 2,200 2,200 0 0
Parks MalnlMan N 10,000 0.0 10,000 10,000 0 0
1.9250 Sod Innelda
TOTAL 1,406,567 1,361,961 1,022,227 503,185--309,139
r+
r;
a.
1i
• rt
91
M
Attachment C
RESULTS OF THE REVISED own"
CITY COUNCIL 1993-94 BUDGET PRIOkITIES QUESTIONNAIRE
MOg e
e.MMUTI cwmr MW
NYfAMWLT RMC4 MAW WPM ~
RMUM CI.UOR ZFFM
COM1OM CUM=upw
OKPIAM CURXWf WPM ~
W WAMALLT ONZAAMCMENT RFPM 4
oimAn Mn vPOaT P
COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING (COPS) 33 5.50 6.40
STREET CONSTRUCTION/RRBUMMING 34 3.67 e'6.33
FIRE PREVENTION 26 4.33 6.20
EMERGENCY MEDICAL (AMBULANCE)
' 26 4.33 617
POLICE PATROL ' 2S 4.17, 67
STREET MAWTENANCE/REPAIR 31 5.17 5.63
RECYCLING EFFORTS 31 5.17 5,83
GREENBELT SYSTEM PLANNM/DEVLOPMENT 21 4.67 5.6T
DRUG ABUSWENPORCEMENt P,ROORAMS 27
EMPLOYEE TRAWW/DW0WPMENT24 . 133 ! 67
FIRE SUPPRESSION . , ? • 24: i 4.$0 3.67
BICYCLE/H[KI G TRAIL DEVELOPMENT 26 4.67 5.60
LIBRARY YOU'THICHI.DREN'S PROGRAMS 26 4.33 5.60
LITTER PROGRAMS 32 5.33 S.50.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (INSPECTIONS, ECT.) 27 4.50 5.40
LIBRARY PROGRAMS (W GENERAL) 29 4.13 5333
MUNICIPAL. OOURT ` 27 <.50 5.33
INFO/DATA PROCESSM SERVICE!! 25 03 $.33
CRIME IV EVIGATION , . • 23 1.17 533
LOW & MODERATE INCOME HOUSING 26 4.67 y~S.20
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES (NICE, ETC.) 21 4.50 5.20
ANIMAL CONTROL 27 4.50 3.20
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS (MANAGEMENT) 24 4.00 5.20
LONG RANGE COMPRWIENSM PLANNING, 33 5.50 5.17
CITY BEAUTII9CATWN 21 4.67. S.17
DEMOLITION OF SUBSTANDARD BLDG 30 5.00 5.00
INTERNAL AUDIT SERVICES 29 4.67 S.W
YOUTH RECREATION PROGRAMS 27 4.54 5.00
LIBRARY EXPANSION 27 4.50 S.00
CIVIC CENTER MAINTENANCE 26 4.33 S.00
TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION/ENOINEERING 25 4.17 5.00
LIBRARY REFERENCE SERVICES 25 4.17 5.00
WORKFORCE DIVB$SLTY 28 4.67 4.93
EMPLOYEE PAY PLAN ADtUMfENTS/BENEFYTS 26 4.33 4.63
PARK MANTENANCB 2S 4.17 4.13
e
r
Attachment C, con't.
RESULTS OF THE REVISED owvas
CITY COUNCIL 1993-94 BUDGET PRIORITIES QUESTIONNAIRE w
rwarn •
aaaarl cavort OPM7 i
PJWANnuir aIOa Cwamr UTM I
aaDUO celuarr as+rwr I
ao"Tww claamr ands 4
aIOM/ Clkaw aasar s
waaunwir avow MUM anm a
amun Taft ov= r
F ry l4~, R
A. ~
gE 1 %4
LEGAL SERVICES „ 25 4.17 4.63
PARiCQdGlTRAFFIC ENFORCEMBNT ' a 22, 3.67 '443
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SPAN, ETC.) 25 4.17 4.60
ECON DEV UTLtrY INCENITVS LINES 25 4 17 4.67
STREET SWEEPING 24 40 4.0
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT AIN 5:.; ETC.) 23 " 3.13 4.67
DRAINAGE DISTRICT 27 4.50 4.60
RECREATION CENTER PROGRAMS 26 4.33 4.60
LIBRARY AUDIOVISUAL SERVICES 24 4.00 4.60
NEW PARKS/PARK EXPANSION 24 4.00 4.60
ECON DBY INCENTIVES (TAX ABATE$ ECT.) 21 467 + , 4.50
CONTRIBUTIONS TO WJMAN SB]IVICE AGENCIES 33 4.30
EcON DEV UTILITY IIIC8lT[ 1V8 RATES 23 4.17 430
PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT 25 4.17 4.40
WATER STORAGE/RBSERV88 26 4.33 433
CURRENT' K0'IBI.M0TEL'TAX +CONTRIBUTIONS 23 417 ` . 4.33
STORM DRAWAOE IMPROYEIIEN ' 2S 4.17 4.33 j
AIRPORT DBVELOPMgNT 24 . 4.00 4.33
SENIOR CITIZEN PROGRAMS 26 4.33 _ 4.17
[-NEW ATHLETIC PROORAMS 24 4.00 4.00
RISK MANAGEMENT 25 4.17 3.63
3.67
HIGH WEEDSIDBBRIS VIOLATION ENFORCEMENT 21 4.67
SION VIOLATION ENP MEW NT 21, 4 67 3.b7
NEW WAMWATRi TREATMENT PLANT 23 3.63 3.67
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS 24 4.00 3.30
BUQ.DWrJ PECTWN 27 4.50 3.400
NEW ATHLETIC FIELDS 23 3.13 3.00
c~inKnwusWVUr,vKS
M
Attachment C, can't.
MAP Z
Below Am APwi& mc64m Or duvichhe given to staff by zadvidad 1993-94 annual badvet. CO maob iw uded is 8nctab were torsi by ~kr ~for PWPa~ the
s i
Take stepped-up action on recycling. Look at Dickson committee proposals again.
Investigate current private hauling for recycling purposes. Research surrounding cities.
Take leadership role in 'Vision for Denton' long range planning proem and provide funds
for the program.
Spend more time [with Council memben] in order to establish more depth of understanding or each part
of the budget.
Make a thorough study of solid waste ism and develop short tern and long term plans.
Concentrate on developing existing Parke and Recreation heititia and fields rather
than purchasing new locations.
9 support the idea of establishing a] court of record.
Immediate, through enforcement of sign ordinance.
[Ins regards to DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT (MAIN ST., ETC.)] It memo to me we have done much
downtown end mainly need to hold steady what we have accomplished.
What can we do to reduce our tax rate? e.g. What will stormwater utility do in this area?
Prepare a budget holding the line working toward a tut decrease not just below the effective rote.
[My response to initiate new effort in LIBRARY EXPANSION) envisions bringing system to
standard, automation, etc.
Provide new computer systems for Police, Fire, and Library. Take this out of the normal
C1P process and have council mats dsterminatioaa and make use of C.O.s
In my judgement (regarding AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT,J we area making an effort
here that is a maximum considering Dei resources.
Accelerate hike/bike trail plants).
[locrease current effort toward] more long range planning, especially with respect to outcome
of economic development effort as a basis for sound policy.
[Determine] what programs that can be slimleated the City has funded for several years
and should stand alone. Le. Thres years or more.
[Conduct] thorough inventory of all city propertia--with chain, etc. being sumberedl I
What effect would a 10% across the board decrease in each department have?
(My reaponsa to continue current effort on the NEW WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT) envisions
tompletiea of current project.
11 place a high priority on initiating new efforts for a 112% ales tax).
c.~ i ss nrw~asvouarr,rrx t
Attachment D
F7777
CITY OF DENTON
GENERAL FUND REVENUE SUMMARY
1993-94 PROPOSED BUDGET
1991192 1992/93 1992193 1993194
DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE PROJECTED
CY VALOREM 8,999,870 8,892,976 8,967,874 8,969,572 ~y
DEL AD VALOREM 260,684 200,000 3N.000 200,000 CURRENT-P/I 80,552 70,000 70,000 70,000
PRIOR-P/I 99,983 80,000 80,000 801000
TAX COLLECTION FEES 79,143 80,000 80,000 80,000
AD VALOREM TAXES 9,519,932 9,322,976 9,613,874 9,399,572
SALES TAX 5,538,602 5,920,095 6,099,918 6,369,802
SALES TAX 5,538,802 5,920,095 610990918 6,369,602
A~
FRAN-LSO 294,101 302,925 270,700 282,925
FRAN-GTE 180,691 132,250 132,260 136,217
FRAN-SAMMONS 239,605 232,200 257,404 260,000
FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS 714,297 867,376 880,354 679,142 w I
E
MIX BEV TAX 68,167 60,000 68.000 68.000
HOTEUMOTEL TAX 428,783 4?.0,000 445,000 458,000
BINGO TAX 18,441 27,000 15,000 11,000
FRAN-TU ELECTRIC 34,798 36,600 38,000 39,160
TOTAL OTHER TAXES 5500179 542,600 584,000 576,160
SWIMMING POOL 44,132 42,600 48,800 46,800
CEMETERY FEES 10,275 91000 91000 9000
COMMUNITY BLDG RENT 17,301 25,100 23,610 23,610
AIRPORT 57,924 65,200 311181 65,000
ATHL F1ELD3-ELECT FEE 0 0 0 17,000
REC PAOG ACT FEES 9,443 10,800 11,390 11,390
ATHLETIC 11,068 6,023 3,400 6,023
AMB SRV FEES 224,170 224,600 243,339 324,800
WILLIAM SO PAAKING FEES 12,138 12,264 12,264 12,264
FIRE INSP. 29,290 22,600 28,000 26,600
ENGINEER-CHARGE TO BF 403,782 466,000 455,000 465,000
SUB-AMBULANCE 0 0 6,662 28,060
REVENUE FEES 619,621 863,267 868,436 1,014,367
Attachment D, cont.
..a4,n:!V i 1y n k r !
CITY OF DENTON y
GENERAL FUND REVENUE SUMMARY
19903-94 PROPOSED BUDGET
6 r s e
•'f yw'fi c a.,A x S. d ~s l d` iy r z i'3'l 1 n ?p1,...
1991/'92 1992193 1992W 1993194
DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE PROJECTED
WARRANT FEES 28,549 60,000 50,000 60,000
ANIMAL POUND FEES 101,614 66,000 61,154 62,000
AUTO POUND FEES
30,617 51.545 42
• ,000 40,000
MOWING FINES 11,647 12,000 12,000 12
POLE ,000
SCORT 3 GUARD FEES 14,802 14,800 23,000 23,000
COURT COST SRV FEES 23,036 25,000 26,000 25,D00
ANIMAL CONTROL FINES 4,683 6,000 4,600 5,000
DENTON POLICE FINES 491,756 660,000 640,000 640,000
INSP FINES 8 FEES 969 800 600 800
FIRE DEPT FINES 8,457 24,420 10,500 101500
LINT POLICE FINES 31,485 41,000 36,000 38,000
TWU POLICE FINES 8,273 11,000 6,000 6,D00
PARKING FINES 64,357 45,000 38,000 38,000
APPEARANCE BOND FORFEIT 5,205 5,000 8,000 8,000
COURT ADM FEES 48,644 60,000 78,000 78,000
1 ARREST FEES 67,684 55,000 76,000 76,000
RESTAURANT INSP 21,743 28,600 28,600 27,000
GROCERY INSP 11,816 10,240 10,460 11,800
SWIM INSP 15,520 14,400 14,240 14,240
FOOD HAND INSP 3,5,652 43,500 43,600 43,500
DAY CASE INSP 3,147 2,802 3,160 3,151
UNIFORM TRAFFIC 24,636 0 41,000 41.000
FALSE ALARM FEES 61850 5,600 61100 5,000
POOL MGR CERT 11295 1,600 1,650 11000
FINES & FEES 1,038,938 1,21 4,007 1,2,;8,544 11258,791
ZONE PAMTSIPETITIONS 21,026 28,000 21,000 21,000
WINE & BEER LICIPEA 71178 71160 7,060 7,000
ELEC 6 PLUMB LIC 10,637 15,000 16,600 19,375
VITAL STATS-BIRTH 21,968 20,000 18,000 20,000
BLDG PERMITS 97,302 74,300 97,600 97,500
TEMPORARY GAS 13,285 11800 1,600 1,600
LOADING ZONES 0 1,000 0 11000
R.O.W. INSP FEES 14,896 17,600 23,000 25,000
CURB CUT PERMITS 4,922 3,000 4,200 4,200
MOBILE HOME LIC 10,971 11,300 11,300 11,300
VITAL STATS-DEATH 18,636 14,000 20,000 21,000
DEVELOPMENT FEES 31,221 19,500 36,640 36,000
SIGN PERMITS 15,840 10,500 18,000 15,600
SALE OF DOCUMENTS 2,026 11800 3,000 2,200
Attachment D, cont.
CITY OF DENTON
GENERAL FUND REVENUE SUMMARY
1993-94 PROPOSED BUDGET
, w
1 , N k p
1991192 1992193 1992193 1993194
DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE PROJECTED
PLAN RVW FEE 14,600 18,400 19,000 19,000
CERT OF OCCUPANCY 0 8,000 7,000 71001)
REROOFING PERMITS 0 3,500 1,300 1,300
REINSPECTION FEES 0 1,100 400 400
VARIANCE FILING FEE 160 350 150 150
LANDSCAPE FEES 0 640 640 540
PARKING LOT PERMITS 200 0 0 0
FENCE PERMITS 0 1,200 1,600 1,800
MECHANICAL PERMITS 0 7,200 8,000 8,000
MOVING PERMITS 0 250 120 120
DEMOLITION PERMITS 0 600 160 150
POOLISPA PERMIT 0 11200 1,200 1,200
LICENSES d PERMITS 293,856 287,000 313,160 322,036 q
PARKING METER AEC 24,367 20,000 21,000 21,000
ELEC INSP 12,900 12,400 15,000 15,000
PLMS INSP 18,915 14,000 15,000 15,000
OT INSP 560 1,260 3,000 1,600
INTEREST INCOME 678,169 510,000 470,000 460,000
TRAFFICIPOLICE RPRTS 18,570 18,000 18,000 18,000
MISC INCOME' 195,907 73,260 74,700 75,000
STREET CUTS 248,734 350,000 250,000 276,000
CNTY CONT-CIVIL DEF 19,869 0 0 0
FED CONTR-CIVIL DEF 38,548 0 0 0
CNTY CONTR-LIB 105,355 108,126 108,126 108,12E
CNTYCONTR-AMBSRV 271,140 282.683 246,634 245,634
SM CITIES CONTR-AMS 48,719 48,719 48,719 48,719
P.U. ANIMAL CARCUSES 2,678 1,700 1,639 11839
ADMIN FEES 0 3,847 0 0
C.LP. ENO. FEES 1,849 1,500 2,250 1,750
GDAC AEVENUE 21,094 0 0 0
MISC REVENUES 1,803,182 1,426,486 1,272,989 11276,288
ki
Attachment D, con't.
CITY OF DENTON
GENERAL FUND REVENUE SUMMARY
1993-94 PROPOSED BUDGET
1991192 1992193 1992193 1993194
DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE PROJECTED
ADM TRANS-ELEC 1.684,835 1,752,007 1,752,007 1,822,884
R01-ELEC 2,333,538 2,294,399 2,294,399 2,338,380
632,540
1,2,515 647393 99448 345 1,134,373
ADM TRANS-WATER 68
ROI-WATER 1,682,162 4831215 471,652
ADM TRANS-WASTEWTR 0 480,214 480,214 989 386
ROI-WASTEWATER 0 837,829 837,829 384,012
ADM TRANS-SAN 10358,,885000 389,`165 15,000 315.00000 15,000
TRANS-DEF DRIVING 235,000 75,000 76,000 75,000
TRANS FOR RSK MGMT 100.000 125,000 125.000 40,000
TRANS-INS FUND 0 37,600 37,600 37.600
TRANS-REC FUND 0 0 0
TRANS-OTHER 222,000 p 137000 137,000 137,000
TRAMS-FIRE RESERVE 0 1,801 1,601 14,926
STATEIFED GRANT 45,408 61,878 62,965 55,166
CONTR DISD
TRANSFERS 7,7240343 7,7117,631 7,798,818 8,127,839
GRAND TOTAL 27,800,829 28,020,356 28,449,882 29,021,976
ocysNLP BY CATEOOBY
AD VALOREM TAXES 91619,932 9,322,976 9,613,874 9;.199,672
5,636,802 5,920,095 6,099,918 6,369,02
879,8
SALES TAX 679,8142
FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS 714,297 887376 584 670,180
OTHER TAXES 650.179 562,800 866,436 1,014,367
REVENUE FEES 819,521 683,287 1,268,791
FINES AND FEES 1,038,938 1,214,007 1 313, 60 322,035
LICENSE AND PERMITS 293,655 267,000 ,6p3,182 1,425,485 1,272,988 1,278,268
MISC REVENUES 1 1,724,343 1,426.481 7,798,818 8,127,639
TRANSFERS
27,800,629 28,020,358 26,449,862 29,021,978
TOTAL FUND
Attachment E
CrrY OF DEWON 11
,
GENERAL FUND B"13NDT1 URB SUMMARY
1993-94 PROP06ED BUDGET
ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE BASELINE PROPOSED
DEPARTMENT NAME 199142 1942-93 1992-93 1993-94 1993-94
GENERAL GOVERNMENT 500,407 301,338 477,581 $04,921 637,390
LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 402,371 416,850 415,500 424,437 448,737
MUNICIPAL JUDGE 111,583 114,365 111,283 111,366 112,257
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1,017,033 1,056,664 1,021,008 1,049,200 1,015,185
FINANCE DEPARTMENT 2,333,694 2,420,692 2,392,268 2,537,199 2,570,247
INFORMATION SERVICES 1,098,233 1,192,234 1,191,399 1,212,376 1,249,305
MUN SER/ECON DEV 176,073 179,586 181,083 183,602 187,181
HUMAN RESOURCES 517,142 322,961 520,321 511,393 582,178
ENVIRONMENTAL SERV 388,121 387,062 380,084 388,255 391,189
PARKS do RECREATION 2,332,518 2,403,021 2,377,842 2,394,884 2,485,012
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 1,165,712 987,815 917,815 986,133 1,074,390
LIBRARY 1,042,267 11060,186 1,033,346 1,056,583 1,072,312
ENOITRANSlSTREETS 3,208,097 3,324,302 3,316,804 3,343,734 3,362,216
AIRPORT 176,646 84,539 89,352 85,446 87,087
DRAINAGE 371,910 373,193 364,205 360,826 347,623
POLICE 8,040,317 6,142,176 6,017,166 6,207,913 8,295,785
FIRE 61361,333 5,513,270 3,462,649 S,S65,820 6,607,129
TOTAL DEPT EXPEND 26,221,335 26,680,262 26,339,906 26,926,088 27,405,223
CONTRIBUTIONSMISC 1,917,015 1,652,111 1,665,130 1,583,193 1,641,280
PROPOSED PAY PLAN 602,905
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 28,138,350 ---211.333,073 - .005.036
21,509,281 9,54,,:08
CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS , tachment
ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES
BUDGET CALENDAR
1993.94
DATE ACTION
February 2 Tuesday Distribute Budget Priority Questionnalre to City
Council.
February 12 Friday Initial meeting for Budget Liaisons.
Council returns Budget Priority Questionnaire.
March 2 Tuesday Review and discussion of Budget Priority
Questionnaire with City Council
March 5 Friday Preliminary Revenue Review with the City Manager
(General Indications and Major Concerns)
March 10 Wednesday Operating Budget Klck•Off (Council Chambers).
March 17 Wednesday Budget Liaisons meeting. (Service Center Training
Room
March 24 Wednesday Revenue Projections from departments due to Budget
Office. (BF-21A)
April I Thursday Pos(Wn Detail (BF-100's) due to Budget Office.
Analysis forme for new data processing equipment
due in Information Services Office with copies to the
Budget Office.
April 6 Monday Classification Forma for new positions due in
Personnel.
Motor Pool Request Detail forms are to be returned to
the Fleet Superintendent for analysis. All requests
must be approved by the Fleet Superintendent to be
considered in the budget,
April 14 Wednesday All Governmental Departmental Operating Budgets
due in Budget Office.
Utilities Operating Budget in to Budget Office.
Presentation of Revenue Projections to City Manager.
May 4 Tuesday Preliminary Budget Discussion with City Manager
Community Development Block Grant Budget
discussion and Human Services Commission
recommendation.
May B Thursday Executive Budget Hearings (Service Center)
fy
7 Friday
-Dedkafed fa Cwury Senv/cn'
t
CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS Attachment F, con't.
ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES
BUDGET CALENDAR at
1993.94
N
i
DATE ACTION
May 12 Wednesday Executive Budget Discussions and Ranking Sessions
& (Service Center)
14 Friday (morning only/Civil Defense Room) 44 i
May 17 Preliminary Appraisal Roll due from DCAD
Six month analysis.
May 18 Tuesday City Council Budget discussion regarding Human 41
Services and Transportation budgets. I
City Council Budget discussions witti the Judge and
City Attorney. a1
j
City Council Community Development Block Grant
Statement s t
' kI
June 29 Tuesday Submit Major Budget Issues Report to Council.
July 8 Tuesday Discuss Major Budget Issues with City Council, ►1
t!
July 13 Tuesday Additional day, if necessary, to discuss Major Budget
Issues with City Council. s i
July 20 Tuesday Hotel/Motel tax recipient budget presentation. e
July 28 Monday Chief appralser certifies appraisal roll. s 9
July 31 Saturday Proposed Program of Services (Budgetl to Council
k I
and file with Chy Saer*ii
August 3 Tuesday Nine month analysis and discussion with the City
Manager,
Submission of effective and rollback tax rates to
Council.
Submission of certified collection rate.
Approval of Appraisal Roll.
Vote to consider a proposal fo• a tax Increase prior to
publishing notice of hearing.
Council budget study and staff budget presentations.
August 4 Wednesday Publish effective and rollback rate. (For Sunday,
August 8, publication)
August 10 Tuesday Council budget study and staff budget presentations.
'Dedketed to 0aWly Swvke'
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES
e'4 BUDGET CALENDAR
4 1993.94
N DATE ACr/ON
E August 11 Wednesday Publish "Notice of Hearing on Budget" (at least 15
days in advance of hearin'jsl. (For Sunday, Auguet
i 15, publication,)
August 18 Wednesday Publish 1st quarter page notice - "Notice of Public
f~ Hearing on Tax Increase" fat least 7 days in advance
of hearing), {For Sunday, August 22, publication.)
August 24 Tuesda i Approval of Hotel/Motel tax recipients' budget,
11 August 31 Tuesday Council Budget study.
it
Public hearing on tax Increase and budget (only
to agenda kem),
1 r September 1 Wednesday Publish 2nd quarter page notice • "Notice of Vote on
Tax Rate.' (For Sunday, September Sth publication,)
i September 7 Tuesday Final Council Budget Study
II
September 14 Tuesday Adoption of Annual Program of Services (budget),
Is and then tax rate.
t Consideration of year-end budget adjustment
ordinance.
1
1 September 17 Friday Publish notice of adopted budget availtblo for public
inspection,
~i
i1
,
AAA00101
01!11/17
'Dads oW fo Owllty Sw%**o
II