Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
02-27-1996
WASTEWATER COLLECTION h~ I I 1 xrA 1, ;C ~l ~ J ry i L it i t.. 1,ry ~3 i ! a ki , 0 WON"" i 1 Fr 5.~ ` ;t f t\< < 2 RESIDENC lr 4 4 ` 111 Y 1 ~ f' Y 7 rf 1 1 1 1~, ~ 30 RESIDENCES'' ,j (l~f' 1 1S Il d 1. 0 MA k~h f, \l1 ! A NEXED SINCE 1983 F 4{ r!p 1~ a+ r Gf, xkV ~11~ ~ ls~ 1 p~1 •A: ~ ~ ;1 ~1 ft~ f,,~ 1iA 1 1 4 RESIDENCES ! 1 1. - 5 RES CE wj art"~ , ; L. J y;:U: ti RESIDENC ; 10 ES E ES i NOT'~IN I' t Y, 3 RI'; I NCI i . 4 'J } i_ 1 15 RESI'D, I / /r it t 9 / i , ` Sr CITY OF DENTON, TF JANUARY 12, 1996 NOT TO SCALE J,\WWDATA\ADAT\ 1995\GIS\UNSERVED F Y. 1 1~ „ Y _ . WATER DISTRIBUTION \r~MY~~ MYMIYM~h~r I \ i, 'I 1 ly 1 y N 1 y ~I I~rV ~d i S ! f 1 I 1 J ' IW 1 1+ I ` 6 OUSINESSES 1 '3 10 i I +1~ 1 y 1 . I -30 RESIDENCES t4a, F fi } i O~~ah"~~e s+~~plw Vi ? I ~ .1 . ~ n v ulll, in 5 ~ ANNEXED SINCE 1983 I ~AIll~ fJ.,~ry~~^fI Ye 1~ \ i y a rl. n'~ra1 I a4N'i'~. ~1 v ry A Y I un ` " 1 1 it Y ~ 1~I` ~ III I,I ~lo ~i I , ~MENEM" 9 w, IIP ~ ~ .n.. ~1 1 RES 1 A 11 1-0 E IKOT I 7T .L S 6 i 1i r r i N' r l p14 i 1 n MJ L J .I CITY OF DENTON, TEXA JANUARY 12, 1996 NOT TO SCALE J;\ WWDATA\ ADAT\ 1995\ G1S\ UNSERVED,DWG E rl _ M1 ~,M1 Ss R N s i r i 1 1 i If CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET February 27, 1996 Sj r nncnda ~~o. F AGENDA ti4ondo pOm,,,.., ^ CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL February 27, 1996 The Council will attend a dedication ceremony on Tuesday, February 27, 1996 at 4100 p,m, at the Owslay Neighborhood Park located at 2415 Stella street, Denton, Texas. Closed Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, February 27, 1996 at 5115 p.m, in the Civil Defense Room of City Hall, 215 E, McKinney, Denton, Texas, at which the following items will be considered) NOTE; THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO CLOSED MEET1140 AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT IS LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE. i 10 Closed Meeting: A. Legal Matters Under TEX. GOVIT CODE Sec. 551,071 B. Real Estate Under TEX, GOVT CODE Sec. 5514072 1. Discuss the acquisition of property for expansion of the City'L landfill and wastewater treatment plant, C. personnel/Board Appointments Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sec. 551,074 10 Discuss the appointment and evaluation of the applicants for the position of City Manager. Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, February 27, 1996 at 7:00 p.m, in the city Council Chambers of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: NOTE: A Work Session is used to explore matters of interest to one or more City Council Members or the City Manager for the purpose of giving staff direction into whether or not such matters should be placed on a future regular or speci&A meeting of the Council for citizen input, City Council deliberation and formal city action, At a work session, the City Council generally receivE,s informal and preliminary reports and information from City staff, officials, members of City committees, and the individual or organization proposing council action, if invited by city council or City Manager to participate in the session. Participation by individuals and members of organizations invited to apeak ceases when the Mayor announces the session is being closed to publics input, Although Work Sessions are public meetings, and citizens have a legal right to attend, they are not public hearinys, so citizens are not allowed to participate in the session unless invited to do so by the Mayor. Any citizen may supply to the City Council, prior to the beginning of the session, a written report regarding the citizen's opinion on the matter being explored. Should the Council direct the matter be placed on a regular meeting agenda, the staff will generally prepare a fr,nal report defining the proposed action which will be made available to till citizens prior to the regular meeting at which citizen input is sought. The purpose of this procedure is to allow citizens attending the regular meeting the opportunity to hear the views of their fellow citizens without having to attend two meetings. City of Denton City Council Agenda EAoindo N February 27, 1996 0410 Page 2 (tom w 0410 1, Hold a discussion and give staff direction noncerning the schedule and selection process for selecting a City Manager, 2. Receive an update from the Public Utilities Board, hold a discussion on the development of an in-fill policy for the extension of water and wastewater service and give staff direction. 3, Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding the establishment of a public/private partnership for the implemantaticn of recycling activities identified in the Solid Waste Master Plan, 4, Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding an upcoming bond sale and the refinancing of the Lake Ray Roberts debt, s, Receive a report:, hold a discussion and give staff direotion regarding the proposed Debt Service Management Policy, 6, Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding the JTPA Program, 74 Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction concerning the Development Policy Committee, Following the completion of the Work session, the Council will convene into a Special Called Session in the City Council chambers of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance oanvassing the election results of the February 24, 1996 City of Denton bond Election, 2, Consider appointments to the Diversity Task Force. C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the of , 1996 at,"o'clock (a,m,) (p.m,) ----day CITY SECRETARY NOTEt THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 75 ACCESSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING, PLEASE CALL THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 566-8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX SO THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH THE CITY SECRETARY/8 OFFICE, ACC00290 ~j r a I ApMd1 NO• r~~ Aomla Item j Dew. CITY COUNCIL j AGENDA ITEM TOi MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROMi Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager SUBJECT) RECEIVE UPDATE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INFILL POLICY FOR THE EXTENSION OF WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE, RECOMMENDATION' None at this time, The Public Utilities Board (PUB) is looking to receive direction from the City Council, Various issues have been discussed, The PUB Recommendations on theme issues are included in Exhibit I, A draft policy (Exhibit TT) is enclosed. A formal policy will be developed after these key issues are decided, This policy will be brought to the Council for approval, Exhibit ITT showns some of the infill areas that { have been identified, S11MMARY/BACKGROUNDe The PUB and the City Council have been developing a °Infill" Policy over the last few years, This item was last discussed by the council at its December 11, 1995 work session, The PUB has discussed thi.u item at their December 13, 1995 and January 17, 1996 meetings, The nIn£ill Policy" is an exception to our normal extension policy, PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFPECTEDI City of.`DenLon citizens, Water Department and Wastewater Department, FISCAL percent of IMPACT) The maximum cost that is being considered is 2 and $215,297 total the Wastewater Department-, based on theaFiscal Year 1996 budget, i RRSPEC Y SUBMTTTEDi P a d i Acting City Manager Howard Martin Director of Environmental Operationo Raved ~ y0 i Robert > Nelson, P, 8. sxecutive Director of Utilities Attachment iExhibit I, Key Issues TT. Draft Policy III, Maps (under separate covor) MnfllLeo t r AOortde fJo. ~ ~ KEY ISSUES CONCERNINd INVILL Pd n08yR)tam y, POLICY This is a change in our extension policy, It provides the second exception to the rule that the developer/property owner pay the entire cost to extend water and wastewater lines, The first exception was development plan .lines, The PUB in its meetings on Infill and in its 1996 Planning Session has adopted Lhia poaiticxa, strategic 2. FUNDING r r A) Utilization of excess Development Plan Line Funding. This would provide a maximum funding of $250,000 each year, for both water and wastewater, B) Percentage of gross revenues (1 - 2 percent each year), This would provide $296,237 for the water department and $215,297 for the wastewater department based on the 1996 fiscal year budget. C) A fixed amount of money each year, D) An fixed allocation of funding between residential and commercial E) No allocation between residential and commercial, Money r available on a first come first served basis, The PUB recommends Options A and E. Also, tho present million cap on reserves for this fund would be eliminated,2 $ 3. TYPE OF PROJECTS ELIGIBLE FOR PLrUDING Al Residential 8) Commercial C, Projects within the City limits D) Projects outside the City limits E) Projects internal to the utility service area The PtM recommends Options At Be C and E. projects only existing developed areas would be For resintial eligible, New developments would not qualify, For commercial areas, the City would pre-selects sites/areas that would be eligible. 1 1 r Aponda No. 9, FUNDING ISSUES - RESIDENTIAL Apondoitem Wt. A) Upfront funding by the City of. all cos B) Citizens pay their share up front C) Fixed participation percentages - 75k City, 25% Residents D) Sliding scale participation percentages E) 10Wk participation F) Less than 100 participation ' 0) Payment plan over a five to te.n year period, H) No payment plan r ! , The PUB reoommends Options A, C, F and a, Less than 100 participation would only be allowed if the participating ' i residents paid the entire 25t share, However, this would allow those residents who did not participate to connect later at no cost, other than the normal tap fee, There may be problems with a payment plan (i,e. pavement assessments). However a lot of these people may not be able to pay their cost upfront, 51 FUNDING ISSUES COMMERCIAL The same issues were considered for the commercial area as with the residential area, The PUB recommends Options B, D and H. The dcvelopers would pay all costs upfront just as we do now with development plan line and oversize participation contracts, No payment plans would be made available, A sliding scale was being considered, It would be based on tin evaluation formula, The staff has worked on the development of a formula, We do not think that a formula can be developed that would be fair and equitable, instead staff is proposing a fixed funding percentage. Sections 212.071 and 212,072 of the Local Government Code require that the city comply with the competitive bidding procedures if our participation exceeds 30t of the total contract price. Therefore staff would propose a fixed funding level of 30t,, This would allow the developer to bid the project on his own, 6, PROJECT IDENTIFICATION / EVALUATION - RE;91DEN'I'IAL A) Projects pre-selected B) Projects evaluated as they are submitted, 11` Y P AWda No. W Cep AWda ltam - C) Evaluation Criteria Daio? ;y 1) Costs per connection 2) Environmental and health Concerns 3) Located within corr.. service area 4) Growth potential The PUS reoommends Options a and C, 7, PROJECT IDENTIFICATION / EVALUATION - COMMERCIAL { A) Projects pre-selected i } B) Projects evaluated as they are submitted. C) Evaluation criteria 1) Project cost j 2) Utility Revenue potential 3) Municipal service requirements 4) 'Pax revenue potential 5) Enhancement of utility systei, i The PUS reoommends Options A and C, One item to consider is should specific tracts of land be identified or should areas be identified such as the area within 1.35 and Loop 288. i 7, PRIORITIZATION t A) Prioritization criteria B) "First come / project ready" basis Staff recommends Option B. 8, OTHER ISSUES A) Is this action legal? Does it violate the "gift" Provision, is there a public benefit to these extensions? 8) Will this give a competitive advantage to some property owner? D) Can funds expended for this purpose be excluded from "Nat Investment". Therefore no return on investment would be paid on these assets, Agenda No..,. Agenda Item Cate . Feb i C17Y COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO,- MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CIT4 COUNCIL FROM Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager SUBJECTt HOLD A DISCUSSION REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RECYCLING ACTIVITIES IDENTIFIED IN THE SOLID WASTE MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONt The Public Utility Board recommended approval at their meeting of February 19, 1996. Council direction is being requested at this time. SUMMARYt The solid waste staff would like to request proposals from Interested solid waste recycling companies to assist the City wlth the implementation of various recycling activities identified in the Solid Waste Master Plan. The staff proposes to send a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) (See Exhibit 1) to a variety of firms by March 25, 1996 pending the Board's direction Staff will review the proposals and will then narrow [Ito selection to three interested firms, niese firms would then present their respective proposals to the Public Utilities Board for assisting the City with Implementing solid waste master plan activities, The Public Utilities Board will then focus on the part of each proposal, representing recycling activities, they are most interested In Implementing. These firms would then have the opportunity to competitively bid for the provision of service, BACKGROUND, At its October 16, 1995 meeting, the Board reviewed and approved the Solid Waste Department's recycling Request for Quallficalions (RFQ). This RFQ would solicit proposals from interested solid %vaste recycling companies to assist the City with the Implementation of various recycling activities Identified In [Ito Solid Waste Master Plan. J!Lnmagkony b pubadmin egllemhA r19 tf t• 1 ady Ito, (!XJ AGENCIES AFFEcrrJll, rnc`Z,t,m City of Denton Citizens, Solid Waste Department. FISCAL IMPACT, hlscai Impact of establishing a public/private partnership for the implementation of rceyoling activities Is unknown at present Respect ,fitted; Rick a kac Clty Manger j Prepared by, Howard Martin, Director Environmental Operations Approved by: I R, E. Nelson, Executive Director Utilities Exhibit s,'' ± I i i i f J:lhometpenny~6lpubaJmfn~g l;e~Mrrl.f 19 d Y c ~l r, ti9.f10i C;c, 1I, BACKGROUND I Denton is located just 40 miles north of Dallas along Interstate 35.13, The city has a population currently estimated at 69,550 within a 54-square mile area, Its 375 miles of streets provide access to 13,942 single family homes, 2,320 mobile homes, and 13,337 apartment living units. In addition, Denton is host to over 2,500 businf.sses, is the seat of Denton County government, and is home. to both the University of North Texas f (27,000 students) and Texas Woman's University (9,000 students), i 111, MUNICIPAL ORGANIZATION a j The City of Denton is a home rule city with a city manager who serves as the municipality's chief executive officer. He is appointed by and reports to a seven member elected council, The Council also appoints a five member Public Utilities Board which is charged with the broad oversight of Denton Municipal Utilities' policies and strategies, Denton Municipal Utilities consists of the following municipal departments; Solid Waste, Electric, Water, Wastewater, and Fleet Services each of which is managed by a director or superintendent all of whom report to the Utilities' Executive Director. The Executive Director is appointed by the city manager. AAA039C2 3 Loon ~ IV. CURRENT MUNICIPAL SOLID WAST The City's Solid Waste Department offers its citizens a full range of solid waste collection and dlsp,)sal services, To serve its residential customers, the Department performs twice weekly curbside trash collection as well as the collection of large household items placed at the curb. Its Commercial Division serves over 1,700 regular customers, and over 2,200 dumpsters, open top, and compactors among its business and Institutional customers, In addition, it also serves a large number of construction and other sites requiring temporary solid waste containers, The City also operates its own 35 acre Type I landfill which is scheduled for ! expansion by 200 acres in 1997. In addition to the foregoing, the Department's Recycling Division offers its citizens the following recycling services: f • multi material drop off sites and single material drop off sites In-house and school district office paper collection used oil and oil filter collection sites • local business cardboard collection Wednesdays only collection of yardwaste A,uoaxn , K 7I~ 4. ~t4A t1~i wi, Zw panda Itam M CURRENT MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE SERVICES (Continued) + residential curbside newspaper collection on selected collectlon routes + yardwaste grinding at the landfill for use in centralized composting + curbside appliance and large lteni collection + Cable Swap - an alternative to landfill disposal of large items j i .I 1 l I 1 I I W0J9C2 $ r Ve SOLID WASTE MASTER PLAN SUMMARY As a result of initiatives by the Denton City Council (Council) and the Public Utilities Board (Hoard), a Solid Waste Master Plan Advisory Committee (Committee) was appointed by the Council in early 1994. Its mission was to develop a comprehensive and integrated plan for managing Denton's solid waste over the next 20 years based on the following guiding principles; • cost s educational opportunities flexibility • economic development opportunities • risk • environmental stewardship The Committee's efforts culminated in the issuance of a plan that has as Its ultimate goal a 55% diversion of solid waste from the City's landfill by the year 2015 to be accomplished in incremental steps as follows; YEAR DIVERSION RATE 1995 10% 20005 25 % 2010 45% 50% 2015 55% AM039C2 6 _ w r i~ V. SOLID WASTE MASTER PLAN SUM (Continued) The Plan accomplishes these waste diversion increments through a programmed recycling strategy that Includes both a variety of enhanced existing programs and several now programs to be Implemented over the next few years. I' I~ l; i 1 AAAO3X2 7 n l' 7- ell VI, SCOPE OF SERVICES IJ The City of Denton has developed the "Request for Qualifications" (RFQ) with the intent of allowing interested parties maximum flexibility and latitude in achleving the waste diversion goals Identified In the Plan, Even though the waste diversion goals are the primary focus of the RFQ, proposals submitted in response to this RFQ will be evaluated on how comprehensively the proposal addresses the various components of the Plan. r E In addition, proposers are invited to Identify other services they can offer the City Including; ♦ automated residential curbside solid waste collections ♦ street sweeping ♦ residential and centralized composting ♦ medical, special, and hazardous waste collection/disposal ♦ waste to energy programs ♦ special event community/neighborhood cleanups When addressing Plan components, proposers are encouraged to explore Innovative approaches to recycling, processing, marketing and technologies. Such approaches and alternatives should address any unique characteristics of Denton's recyclable waste stream while maximizing both processing efficiencies and associated municipal revenues, AAMM2 i f a '41 au -Ida Ab Q--~~ a i11sm VII, SITE VISITS/STAFF CONTAC S Proposers are Invited to tour Denton and Its landfill, and to visit with the Department's staff to familiarize themselves with Denton in general and the City's solid waste operations In particular, To arrange a tour or visit, please contact the Department at least one week In advance, Although staff will do Its best to accommodate all requests, your cooperation Is requested In order to minimize any impacts at the Department's daily operations, Your contact regarding this RFQ Is; Joseph A, lalentl Recycling Coordinator Solid Waste Department 901-A Texas St. Denton, Texas 76201 817-566.8467 (0) 817.383-7334 (F) The Solid Waste Department's main phone number is 817.566.8420. W039 a 9 r. I, 'r i 7~nda Na ~ VIII, SELEC'T`ION PROCESS .111de nevi J Otto. 69- -a2 ~2 phase i In this phase, all proposals will initially be reviewed by the Department's staff for conformity with the instructions Included in the RFQ. Nonconforming proposals will be rejected. Proposals meeting all requirements will move to phase 11 of the qualifying process. Phase Il In this phase, proposals will be evaluated by staff to determine the following; 0 proposer's comprehensiveness in addressing all Plan components. • proposer's qualifications to Implement the services they offer. Those proposers selected by this evaluation process will be asked to participate in Phase 111, Phase rrr In this phase, the proposers selected in Phase 11 will be asked to make a presentation to the Public Utilities Board. The Board will further evaluate proposals to determine a final list of qualified proposers, AAA0300 10 i x r y, Ap1AQ1 lrq IX, FORMAT OF PROPOSALS All proposals must be submitted In a rigid typo three ring binder no larger than three inchea, Bach binder must contain clearly labeled dividers that delineate each separate section of the proposal, Where possible, all typed pages should be double spaced, However, this requirement does not apply to reference documents such as financial statements or other proposal pages where single spacing is more appropriate, Pages must be numbered consecutively from beginning to end or within each section (o.g. A•I, C-7). Pages must be no longer than 81h" by I 1"; larger pages must be folded up to these dimensions, All reference materials such as organization charts, graphs, or articles should be distinctly labeled (e.g. Exhibit I) and included with the relevant section where possible, Of course, proposers may elect to use an appendix, also. For purposes of the Phases I and 11 evaluations, only three proposal copies are requested and required, Proposers selected for Phase III presentations will be required to submit six additional proposal copies. Although proposers may include any information which they believe necessary to properly represent (heir response, they must include the following at a minimum; .u~osx~ 11 i~ IX, FORMAT OF PROPOSALS (Continued) n0and~Mo._.. loenda Rom. ;tr ddle ----a; ' " ♦ Letter of Transmlual addressed toz Robert H. Nelson, Pa Executive Director Donton Municipal Utilities City Of Denton 215 E. McKinney St, Denton, Texas 76201 ♦ Table of Contents ♦ List of tables, graphs, illustrations, etc, ♦ Statement 2f.~ualificationc inclu~; To be eligible for selection to participate In phases 11 and III of the proposal selection process, all proposers must meet or exceed the following criteria and must provide the following Information; 4 A. Introductory letter expressing the proposer's Intent and overall capability to participate in the bid process as that process Is finally determined by the City of Denton, B, Company history illustrating at least ten years of experience in the recycling business serving cities with populations of at least 65,000, C. Company history illustrating at least ten years of experience providing cities with the specific program elements Identified in the company's proposal. D. Statement fully illustrating proposer's physical ability to carry out the proposal, Such statement must include at a minimum the following; • identification of those human and mechanical field resources that the proposer will use to implement each specific proposal element. W039C2 t 2 t 3j . 1 nd1 heyw Fy _._.s IX. FORIVIAT OF PROPOSALS (Continued) p; • quantity and specifications of resources Including model year and whether such resources presently exist. If such resources do not yet exist, please identify the method and droctablo for acquiring such resources. H. Statement fully illustrating proposer's financial ability to carry out the proposal. Such statement must Include, at a minimum, the following: • cafer or other such document stating proposer's current financial position, and the Intended source of funding for proposal Implementation. • description of any recent (within one year), peeding, or proposed business related activity that would enhance or adversely affect proposer's ability to carry out proposal elements such as civil, criminal legal actions against proposer, regulatory actions against proposer, bankruptcy chapter filings, mergers, acquisitions, or divestitures. 17. Three successful municipal examples of proposer's previous experience implementing the kinds of programs proposed Including: • city name and contact person • type of program and service type • start and stop dates • reason for service termination • resources committed to program • annual workload and performance indicators during program life • materials collected/processed • planned vs actual tonnages collected/processed AAA0390 13 h se ti L!A l No, a ItemIX, FORMAT OF PROPOSALS (Continued) ;2 G1, Ability to record and transfer program productivity and performance data, Identify; • data processing type and model (PC, minl•computer, mainframe) • software name and type (database, spreadsheet) • data transfer capability (diskette, tape, or modem) • hard copy only • frequency of data availability to city H. General company Information including proposer's corporate structure and business background including the following: • organization chart Illustrating proposer's corporate relationships with parent company, subsidiaries, or business partners, • organizational chart Illustrating the proposer's internal corporate structure Including the following. Primary program element management must be performed by personnel with no less than five years' experience: j ~ + Identification of unit responsible for program element management and relationship to other corporate units + Identify by position and qualifications personnel { responsible for program management and implementation and provide resumes for same, I. Statement fully describing the proposer's customer relations practices and staff, and methods of quality assurance, J. Statement assuring that the proposer will abide by all local, state, and federal laws and regulations regarding business operations generally, equal opportunity, and solid waste management in particular, „ AAAGW2 14 8 i, AWds No: © c Ananda Item 1 IX, FORMAT OF PROPOSALS (Continued) i ♦ Proposal Summary This section should Include a one or two paragraph statement summarizing proposer's approach to implementing each Plan component, Timeline nd steps Proposers must include a section which clearly delineates the major steps they would follow to implement the Plan and the implementation month r and year. Each major step should Include any number of smaller steps as necessary to illustrate progress. i ~ Reveeue sharing Although the exact revenue sharing formula proposers intend to suggest Is not required In this section, proposers must include a statement establishing the calculation basis for sharing product revenue with the City. f J tiuosscz 15 ti Agenda No. Apenda Ibm IX, FORMA'T' OF PROPOSALS (Continued) • P=p-uer contact ners~= This section should fully identify the person or persons who should be contacted by City staff regarding this RFQ or Its response if necessary as follows: name and title mailing address phone number fax number J t All conforming proposers' copies must be delivered to the City by 5:00 p,m. April 5, 1996 to: Joseph A, Ialenti Recycling Coordinator Solid Waste Department Municipal Service Center 901-A Texas St, Denton, Texas 76201 PROPOSAL SELECTION TIMETABLE • RFQ DISTRIBUTED - MAR, 1 • PRE BID CONFERENCE MAR. 8 • PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL DEADLINE APR, 5 • S12LLCTION OF PROPOSER(S) FOR BOARD PRESENTATION APR. 26 • 130ARD PRESENTATION(S) - MAY 15 AMOM2 16 t~ . Agenda INm ..W OaSO CITY of 019N1AN, 1'6X/{$ _ MUNICIPAL BUILOfNG • 2 f5 E M0KjNNt'Y_• U8'NTON, TEXAS 76201 017) 666-8200 a DFN1 METRO 434,2629 MEMORANDWA DATE; February 26, 1996 TO., Mayor and Mombers of the City Council FROM, Harlan L Jefferson, Director of Fiscal Operations SUBJECT 1,996 8ON0 SALE To fund the 1996.96 General Government, Solid Waste and Wastewater Capital Improvement ProJeets, the City will soil bonds in May, 1996, In addltion, to take advantage of the lower interest rates, the City will sell bonds In April, 19961n order to refinance the Lake Ray Roberts Present Water, Future Water, Recreation and Greenbelt debt, General obligation bonds totaling $2,516,000 (bonds are Issued In $6,000 increments) will be Issued for the General Government prOleots listed as "unauthorized/unissueel11 on Attachment A, Certifloates of obligation totaling $5,190,000 wIII be Issued for ol'Y hall renovations (1,e, $190,000), Solid Waste Capital expenditures and Issuance costs (Le, 96,000,000) The General Government { expondlture categories are identified in the 1996 Proposed CIP Blue Ribbon Committae 6-Year Plan (see Attachment B). Attachment C details the Solld Waste Capital Plan, A portion of the Solid Waste proceeds will be used to reimburse $1,000,000 of expenditures designated as reimbursable In December, 1995. Revenue bonds toteling 92,760,000 will be Issued for Wastewater capital expenditures and issuance costs, Attachment C also details the Wastewater Capital Plan It is our desire to refinanco all of the Lake Ray Roberts debt which will require a bond Issue In the amount of $76,490,'00 The reffnanofng will produce gross savings of $89,002,878 and present value savings cl 'e111849,1u0 However, the contract with the Corps of Engineers wfll not permit a portion of the debt to be refinance until 1998-A detailed discussion of the Issues Involved in refinancing the Lake Ray Roberts debt Is provided in Attachment D. We have planned a bond rating trip to Naw York for March 21-23, 1996 (see Attachment E'), We will make presentations to both Moody's Investors Services and Standard & Poor's Ratings Group, If you have any quostlons, please let me know, wU al ' Allnchmenla AFFOW00 'Drdleafed to Quality Service" i1 I 1998-2000 OWITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN QBNWALOO0 piNMtf ' 1f8W1N.t.7'. AO TO'FAI.° pOltdlp AIOR ° Q*tK OTNCa cm W PaWMT. YFAa oNPC+t wwEn rtW~wl~: ..._.......J, oadarorN ..........._.._-....,.._..........-.._._.L2N0,.~..5'...1.M.4fwN9~9 _ r. NMbiMal 'aIIMT~~ kS!TM mow MOWN 061*4 NaxiYaiatElwLY9ar gnNppAvAe under Kedy and bWld 1000'drnnmow mow mow 0.00 OIWMO! 01101 MOANOPC19011ANAWNEAk PAe61H1oN Add ftlreg0 apadly underRobedeory'9Nm're16 AO0dngon lllMrfledlmklbn ooo MOW mm of lent) form Mo(7«ay dcAvr4b " 06-11 0M1MOa 001 OUA W 160 DOAIW011 . OAPIM IMPaO'MAh" ON 1 6"O&OWl'kl, Appm 40k to be held to addl unGxPWeo e'rWORK" Itiow IPmooo 19A000 O.WIho 00"WrAl!hall foWmtwnd to PAk Cou1Id1 06-06 Make 0"14 UPOFODI 41VOOAIWa7HI UpgredoAlow.14poNalle'N7/AWAompl4lnu.etWWool reetro IJGNlA9 o00,P40 900,000 000.000 Ie46 PARkI wll01 U l IN tv"Y IN Ob to L MnIEPo proHdo knde06plnq an 7eeeley frog -9510 titian MlWf aA000 Woo 0.06 WAG OCOM 11AWr1AA/tOPtOROOMA"PNl Build connedbM to/klrt41g e1dlWelke 61WO 091"0, SrMh, W Vend take/gtreote ftDW KOM MOCK) %mow 14.06 THAW 00101M LOOP UOSYMI-P"ff -Of -$W? PHI 960.000 MOO MOOD ' 01-06 TMM 0010146A 141A$GINOMW.elAU(M14OOTOAWPA) N-O-W funang fw NOMlinglHm hom Mingo to Pohhy ; 111,000 I I 8eeetWd»dNel.Owro9a oormvneo lfxeraoomnend to Pa'L and CCUndGTlAnked 6l'fwzard II.Ow 111,00.1 00.06 Wild aawlak AMexu.n*,v u~.'te PHI 01-01 mm 001011A /Mrme"Us pill 9aemMO)Idllel.Overeile tdrYFi1te01haM reoatrMnA to p82 end COU/1c0enked by fwnerd 197,000 107,014 197,000 timooo Wool) 91.01 %PAM OOIreU 6FAN ETCO991"TwN PH I gw enadwd mt. DYerete oo'm'iW"slrll momvMnd to pAYand CO11r1d1llNy eMr~nl6rker 600000 ~ ~ V-01 TRAM wal U.9. we 11011 U, 9.71 to I. is A-0-W fundnq to matt'h grate fundng MOW N-Oe 1PAM 0016 eol!WALKB dlAUTNO 10//160MYAV R9WEOt0 ProNdd 6ldevraMl On tPBa HIyhWA4 projW/al ono sit 16 In davelO Pad arMl mo Mom 7KOW 10.000 97g1V0 F9.06 FAO AWr 0021 Mu 9111 aa1Y MALL MAer6AKAN ProWdo/eating, apphanooe.lrodatatkxn, and fum!shf MMr 1W..-im C. 1y Wit lor.Watiore . 1~~ -_160000 100,600 O 2,610.000 1900.000 14e960 96.000 51110,000 ' i I I D .I INK UI 1 . q '1`1L 19Y061ue source lnolu<lee teNNcata of ob' jdtlon, fund balanoo, and geMralfund neource/, 1anoR ~ f1 $ 1? 1996 PROPOSED CIP Blue Ribbon Committee 6-Year Plan I 96.96 98.97 97.98 - - 98.99 - 9900 W TOTAL - Streets/Trafflo 1,498 1,873 11865- T 2,789 v 3,08'7 - 11,112 - M4 di, - Dralnego 715 675 1,396 2,461 1,992 - 7,2.38 22u4 Parks & Recreation Boautiflcotlon _ 300 _16-0 2 QEom, --?L700 _ 7 K 2 7 Bond Election Total - - 2,613- 3,298 5,310 71100 7,779 26,000 Authorized Unissued - - . ----II (Ft. Worth Drive) 1,400 1,400 CO's for F'acilitlos 1w - - I~ Equlpmont: City Hall Phase 11 190 - 190 -_6 DMC Phase li_u_ 715- J-- - - 715 2.2 - Public Safety 21000 2,000 6.2 Computers _ - - , Gen Govt, Computers 2,QL 2.Og0 6,2 4~2 - $4,698 6 025 Al1'1(~0 -$7,279 32,05 101 Arr010d7 r l ~ ( t O I~Q ArT Winds No. ApBOd1 Rom. SUMMARY OF WASTEWATER/SOLID WASTE pR +R'fjY WASTEWATER PROJECTS ~zo~r 0IOS~I ) Land Purchase Composting Facility 1,000 Cordova & Stuart Line Replacement 600 Oversize Sewer Lines 930 100 Infiltration Inflow Correction Invent 225 Cooper Creek Lift Station Denton West Force main 275 Cooper Creek upgrade tnterceptor & I/I 528 Barrow Lift Station 160 I4WY 377/380 Sewer Line Relocation 815 Training Var.ility 40 Covered Service Vehicle Parking f,5 Treatment Paved Road 4 Total $ 4,310 i SOLID WASTE; PROJECTS P OJEC1' 1 OU Landfill Expansion $ 3,131 Landfill Property Purchase (Sullivan) 1,069 Landfill Property Purchase - Other 1,000 Methane Collection Syystem 700 Intermediate Processing Center (IPC) 200 Communications Tower 200 Total $ 6,300 Affene'l fin, ® 1~!tcr7~ it^m ~ CITY Of D#NTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING i 216 F. MOKINNEY DEN TON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM (017) 666.8200 o OFW METRO 4342629 TOi Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager FROM: R. E. Nelson, Executive Director of utilities DATE: February 22, 1996 RE: RAY R089ATS PRESENT, FUTURE, RECREATION, AND GIREENBELT DEBT RMF'INANCINO, WASTEWATER SOND SALE AND SOL.TD WASTE DOM SALE i The Public Utility Board (PUB) and Staff recommend the refinancing of the Lake Ray Roberts present water supply, future water supply, recreation, and greenbelt debts. The proposal is to refinance the debt using two revenue bond issues, one for $42,235,000 and the other for $33,255,000 for a total of $75,490,000, The PUB and Staff also recommend a $2,750,000 Wastewater revenue bond sale and a $5,000,000 Solid Waste certificate of obligation bond sale, RAY ROBERTO REVENUE DEBT REF`INANCI The refinancing of the Lake Ray Roberts debt is estimated to result In gross savings of approximately $89,000,000 and present value savings of approximately $11,900,000, This refinancing would also shortening the debt payment term by twenty-three years, with the final payment in 2024 versus 2047, The exact financial impact on the Water Utility will depend on the final interest rate and the repayment schedule. The real dollar benefit of this proposed refinancing will occur when the refinancing debt is paid off in 30 years and no payments are required for the next 23 years. During payment of the refinancing debt, annual payments will be somewhat higher than if the existing debt is not refinanced, In particular, fiscal year 1997 and 1998 annual debt payments will increase by approximately $900,000 over current projected debt payments. However, the staff believes this added amount can be managed with the previsouly planned 0 water rate increases in 1997 and 1998 which is part of the rate ramping strategy necessary to finance the Ray Roberts Water Plant planned for 2005. By 1999, the refinanced debt payments would "Dedtcated to Q:11181y S'e vkv" a ~AJMO 7 only be $1oo, ooo per n'` "I 4n.- Year higher than our ? d o ec d WG~~ payments, -_l It is proposed to use a combination of cash reserves and moderate rate increases to offset the increased debt, cost over the next- few years, The utility strategic plan, Established several years ago, has been to moderately ramp up water rates to avoid a large rate increase when the future water payment begins in 1999, This existing strategy remains viable under the proposed refinancing, in combination with the use of reserves accumulated during the past few years, The proposed Ray Roberts debt refinancing would be accomplished by paying off the present water supply and recreation debt now and paying off the future water and greenbelt debt in 1998. The reason for the delay in paying off the future water and greenbelt debts is that a City of Denton/Army Corps of Engineers contract amendment would be required, and this action could take a year or longer to accomplish, since the current interest rates are very low, it is desirable for Denton to lock in the current rates by selling all of the required debt now to satisfy both current and future debt: requirements, This can be accomplished by two separate debt issues sold at once. The proceeds from one issue will be received now to refinance present water and recreation debt, whereas the proceeds from the second bond issue will not actually be received until required in 1998. This second debt issue represents a "forward delivery" instrument in that the rate is determined now for funds delivered at a future date, Due to the size of the debt issue and the complexity of PirstrSothwdelivery" bond est, recommends stthat Dethetlsale ibe negotlated ras i apposed to the normal bid process, I WASTEWATER RLVLh9 BOND BALL The $2,'150,000 wastewater bond sale is required for currently toptheewastewat re1treatment plant, aThis land purchase will adjacent primarily as a buffer area for the wastewater treatment plant, for a biosolids injection area and to support the city's greenway system along the pecan creek flood plain, SOLID WASTE CEI3TYFICATE OF Q 3LIOATION klOND ,NL4 The $5,000,000 bond sale, consisting of $3,325,000 in twenty year bonds and $1,675,000 in five year bonds, is required to continue the current approved solid waste CIP and land purchase programs, These funds are needed to keep the r AXfd,11 NT D, court, A landfill expansion project on schedule, DOn August 15, 1980, the City of Denton entered into contracts for the right to utze an undivided 26~ of the total. water storage in Lake Ray Roberts and Lewisville Lake, and for the development of recreational facilities related to the project, The Water Utility is now paying debt service on the present water supply and recreation projects. Payment on part of the Water fiscal supply, designated as future water, was delayed until 99, The begin inefiscal year 1998 when ethe project will s be e completed, Pursuant to Article 5a of the water storage contract, and Article 3(6) of the recreational contract, the City of Denton has the right to prepay these debts without penalty, The interest rate on the existing Ray Roberts debts is 7,21, The current bond market interest rate is approximately 5,4% which makes this prepayment option attractive at this time, Since the greenbelt and future water supply not scheduled to begin until the fall of 997 payments respectively, bond funds would be placed in escrow for this 1998 debt and paid when the debts are due. A relatively small amount of bond funds ($500,000) would be sold to cover any adjustments in project costs that might occur in the future, Ray Roberts Refinanain Estimated Gross Savings Estimated Present Value Savings $ 89,003,000 $ 11,649,000 Estimated 1996 bond sale $ 75,490,000 Wastewater Bona ate 1996 CIP Bond Fund Projects Cordova & Stuart Projects $ 2,530,000 Composting Facility 430,000 Additional Land Purchase 600,000 7- 5 1996 Total Bond Projects Q1000 Bond Funds Available 4,310,000 1.560 000 1996 Proposed Wastewater bond sale $ 2,750, 000 ,Salid Waste Bond St_atLi6 1996 Short Term Bond Fund P;:,) 1996 Long Term Bond Fund Proje'. $ 1,675,000 1996 Total Bond Requirements 6 4,62_ _ 000 ,3000 0,000 A 199 6 Long Term Bond fund Pro eats Long Term Bond Funds Available 1996 Long 'perm Bond Sale Required 3 325 000 1996 Short Term Bond Sale Required , 1, 675, OOQ 1996 Total Bond Requirements 6,300,000 Long Term Bond Funds Available IA=000 1996 Proposed Solid Waste Bond Sale $ 510000000 Respectfully Submitted, R, C, Nelson, Rxecutive Director Utilities Rxhibits, 1, Draft City of Denton refinancing calculations with the United States Army Corps of Engineers 2. Wastewater and Solid waste project Summary ,~11 St1MMARY OF WASTEWATER/SOLID WASTE PR g".UIlcm WASTEWATER PROJECTS ~00 ) Land Purchasa Composting Pacility 11000 Cordova & Stuart Line Replacement 600 Oversize Sewer Lines 430 100 25 Infiltration Inflow Correction Invest , Cooper Creek Lift station ?75 Denton West Force Main 275 Cooper Creek Upgrade Interceptor & I/I 525 Barrow Lift Station 15 HWY. 377/380 Sewer Line Re].ocation 8160 Training Facility 815 40 Covered Service Vehicle Parking 65 Treatment Paved Road 30 Total $ 4,310 SOLID WASTE PROJECTS PR _JECT AMOUNT I Landfill Expansion Landfill Property Purchase (Sullivan) $ 1,069 Landfill Property Purchase ~ Other Methane Collection System 1,000 Intermediate Processing Center (IPC) 700 Communications Tower 200 20 Total $ 6,300 OI7Y OF OGNTON BOND SALE TIMELINE I i908 - W 7N - `ssnlir - -I1r rsn ua I T Pj~-i `l.- w I 7 ' 1 .1_ A t II 11 a 1 O I/ a 1__ l C- 1 l-7 RI!9POb5lBLN _ DU RA}]~ .-_UA71f - _ t)MIt 9'fA'[>•1S, I I II II 1 11 II li 1 IO It it Nartan lettaun IUOy lan.10. 1996 tan.10.14M Done ylI0.43 I-Contact EeandaleJdw enJ boed ntwlney w. 'i -dleatt oealfa bond tatlngtrlp enJ dmellne fur lellfigbwnde tequeN In len l to 1x16 to mludm -re gdea adlnanoe to witboadl i. - --Mn-d TreaurYkpt 28 Imp Pon, L 196 IeM139, 3 nepe1 radngoon0mueltymetehal padapp - _ ours - - - _ 19nandd Addwr 19 P6b. 19, 1716 bled ll, )996 Ptepatobondndn F)aln gprexnadon ouulne:Jnatedet _ - 1lnandd Addar 39Ihri II, 15.19% Alar 1 , I a fYepue Of&mlSatnmml _ liulwtletteam 1 my Pe b.10, 1996 DeN,30, 1996 f Meal whh seniro depaltmenb requerJngtged hods 6 Pre l<• dedoo to COdndlrep0tding the need to ale tend!--dmellne aed bond 11ar1at letteuul lOay I'ak17,1996 Yelait, 19M tadngatp(wakw~lonllem) _ ' O111A Mardi 19,19Af hlntd 19.1996 C7roup I my i Mtetu{d, lndiddud anve111ng on Mod radagalp Ilarlm lattelvm Ilkv---mwhlo.im Mardtlo,19% b Preienl to CS7Cundl the fe lent to Solo Ito kiddonROrJutnnro k (maahan OOdepkfaelele) IWad Camdl,___-_ un 0111)A6 Marrhfl,l40.5 Magid 11,1995 9 'IYlpm New Vakto meetvlth Bend RadngAypnde0 - 001% i Bond Couedl I Day Mnrd li, 199G Mud 31 1916 10 Itihlld noJM of IMenl 109016 in Nntorl Itm'd Chian] Rod Bond Wyer (ddl Is bond 61WAOfetpeaatdlq) - - 04) M& Ignaedd Mdaor Ibey Apd116, 1996 April IA 1996 11 Apptouellona PutdOle Ageent<nldudnpCtlry('aadl meetlng DSfl1~96 1 LAY Ma 7,1996 May 1,!996 J IYnenda rWdtol - 11 Open eealN RdtdvingCYry COUndl meeaeg _ - ~ ~ In 0 0 I Z; Apsnda Ifrrt DA CITY COUNCIL. REPQR' T0; Mayor and Members of the Clty Council PROM; Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager SUEJECT; DEBT SERVICE MANAGEMENT POLICY MOMMENDATION; Staff recommends that the City Counoll approve the attached Debt Service Management Policy, The document represants our current practices and was designed to be a comprehensive capital financing policy, DA-MM UM: State and local governments in the United States finance capital Improvements In many dlfforent ways. Current revenues from taxation, property assessments, user fees, fines and forfeitures are used as a sort of "pay-as-you-go" method of Improving Infrastructure, Grants are another Important source of revenue, although this source has deollned in Importance over the last few decades, Most Important, however, Is the use of borrowed funds and these are largely obtalned from the sales of securities. As citizens of the United States became more moblie, moving their place of residence on an average of once every five years, the use of bonds to finance Infrastructure has taken on a new Importance. By using bonds to finance oapital improvements, new residents pay a proportionate share of debt service through taxatlon for Improvements that were made to accommodate their arrival, )'he use of bonds also is appropriate when the necessary improvements are too oxponslve to be affordable on the basis of a single approprlatlon, Because of the scrutiny of local government's financial management due to the default of Orange County, Callfornla and other events ocourring around the country, it is now Important to reduce our current capital finanoing practices to writing, This polloy will improve communication among staff members, Indlvlduals In our community, bond rating agencies and those Indlvlduals who purchase our securities, We are also hopeful that this document will assist In persuading national rating agencies to Improve our bond rating. SUMMARY, Although the polloy Is comprehensive, It Is not unnecessarily restrictive, The Issues In the policy range from Identifying the individuals who will be responsible for the debt management program of the city to Identlfioation of the type of debt Instruments that will be utilized. The policy also discusses the bidding parameters for accepting compotitfve bids and debt enhancement alternatives, Finally, the polloy discusses ways In which we can limit our arbitrage Ilabiilty PROGRAMS, DEP MjM Tj_QR GROUPS AFFECTED; All of the departments, divisions and agoncles of the City of Denton that utilize debt funds will be affecterf by the polloy, In addition, our bond rating agencies, financial advisor, bond counsel and the Indlvlduals who purchase our securities will be offerted. A%nda No, Aq^.rJ~ i1am. Counoll Report Format Vale_ February 27, 1994 Page 2 FISLA_ L I_MPAOT: None j Respectfully submitted; Riot svehia Prepared by; Aoting City Manager Harlan L, Jeffers or of Flsoal~ l Operatlona Approved by: Kathy b 6os, Executlve blreotor of Finenoo i' AFF01ODE EnUOaurr, Debt Somico Mdwppmont Policy i ti 'r CITY OF DENTON I Ise, ~ POLXCY/ADMINISTRATYVB PROCRDURB/ADMXNISTRATIVS DIRBCTXVR 6noatIF14aE Dab. [1101,'C TNNSA E "I'RRI3NCH NUMBRR ANpdEMEN'P POLICY B1'PECTIVIi DATB; R, DEB'Y ERVICE MANAGEMENT RTtpI ,ACl3S: PURPOSE T he Debt Management policies set forth comprehensive guidelines for the finaaloisg of capital obtain financingxonlyiwhensnecessarsyy, t(2) theoprocessf fore Canity amount of debt or other finan cing be as efficient as possible and 0) the most favorable interest and other costa be obtained. RESPONSIBILITY The primary individual who shall be involved in development of financing recommendat tone will be the Director of Fiscal operations, The Executive Director of Finance shall be responsible for all debt financing activities, and shall ea,cablish a system of control to regulate the activities of the Director of Fiscal Operations, To assist with the development of recommendations, there is hereby created a debt management committee consisting of the City manager, Executive Director of utilities, Executive Director of Finance, Director (,f Fiscal operations, Controller, chief. Finance Officer, and Internal Auditorl and Financial. Advisor and Bond Counsel as ex-offioio members, The responsibilities of the committee shall be toI • meet as necessary to consider the need for financing and assess progress on the Capi.il Improvement program, • meet as necessary in preparation for a financing, e review changes in state And federal legislation, and to, • review annually the provisions of ordinances and/or resolutions authorizing issuance of obligations, and to • annually review services provided by the Financial Advisor, Bond Counsel and Paying Agent to evaluate the extent and effectiveness of sorvices being provided, Prior to the debt management committee meetings, a written report shall be prepared on the statue of Capital Improvement program financing. The report shall be based in part on information collected from the primary capital improvement project managers in the city and shall include a projection of near term financing needs compared to available ' resources, an analysis of the impact of contemplated financings on the property tax rate, utility rates, usar charges, and a financing recommendation. In developing financing recommendations, the Debt Management Committee shall consider: 1 e the time proceeds of obligation are expected to remain on hand and the related carrying coat! • the options for interim financing including short-term and interfund borrowing, taking into consideration federal and state reimbursement regulations! • the effect of proposed aoti)n on the tax rate and user charges! AAA03r19 Revised 01113196 PAGE 2 OF 7 POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (C Wee ~ 6Pd!!9 TITLE: DEBT FF,RVICE MANAGEMENT Di16 RE ESE i • trends in interest rates; • other factors as appropriate. Bond Counsel Involvement Solid counsel shall advise the City Council in all matters pertaining to its bond ordinance(s) and;'or resolution(s), and no action shall be taken with respect to new obligations until a written instrument has been prepared by the bond attorneys certifying the legality of the proposal. The bond attorneys shall prepare all ordinances and other legal instruments required in the execution and sale of any bonds issued, which shall be reviewed by the City Attorney and Director of Fiscal Operations. The City will also seek the advice of bond counsel on all other types of financings and on any other questions involving federal tax or arbitrage law. Financial Advisor Involvement The City will seek the advice of the financial advisor on an ongoing basis. The financial advisor will advise on the structuring of obligations to be issued, inform the City of various options, advise the City as to how choices will impact the marketability of City obligations and will provide other services as defined by the agreement approved by the City Council. SHORT-TERII DEBT General -te which themCityiulti ately intendssto issueilong-term~debt; oi.e., it portions will of be projects when appropriate, to provide interim financing which will eventually be refunded with the proceeds of long-term obligations. Short-term obligations may be backed with a tax and/or revenue pledge, or a pledge of other available resources. Interim financing may be appropriate when long-term interest rates are expected to decline in the future. In addition, some forms of short-term obligations can be obtained quicker than long-term obligations and thus can be used until long-term financing can be obtained. Commercial Paper Due to exorbitant issuance costs associated with the marketing and placement of commercial paper in amounts of less than approximately $30 million, it is not considered feasible for the City of Denton to issue this type of debt. In additior, cities may legally only issue commercial paper for revenue supported projects. Howev(,r, should the opportunity to participate in a commercial paper issuance pool present itself, the advantages and disadvantages shall be evaluated by the Director of Fiscal Operations. LONG-TERM DEBT General Proceeds from the sale of long-term obligations will not be used for operating purposes, and the life of the obligations will not exceed the estimated useful life of the projects financed. Debt service structure will approximate level debt service unless operational matters AAA03 F 19 Revised OL23r96 Agenda No?AGE _nzoq POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (Cc &W&J11m S TITLE: DEBT SERVICE MANAGEMENT and marketing considerations dictate otherwise. Unless circumstances dictate the issuance of larger amounts for a major project or projects, the City will strive to limit its annual issuance of long-term obligations to either $5 million or $10 million to take advantage of small issuer exemptions in the federal arbitrage laws. Should subsequent changes in the law raise these limits, then the City's policies will be adjusted accordingly. i The cost of issuance of private activity bonds is usually higher than for governmental purpose bonds. Consequently, private activity bonds will be issued only when they will economically benefit the City. The cost of taxable debt is higher than for tax-exempt debt. However, the issuance of taxable debt may be more appropriate in some circumstances, and may allow valuable flexibility in subsequent contracts with users or managers of the improvement constructed with the bond proceeds. Therefore, the City will usually issue tax-exempt obligations, but may occasionally issue taxable obligation. Bonds Long-term general obligation or revenue bonds shall be issued to finance significant and desirable capital improvements. The general obligation bonds will be used for purposes set forth by voters in bond elections. General obligations bonds will have an average life of approximately 15 years or less, and Revenue bonds will have an average life of approximately twenty (20) years or less. A resolution of intent to issue bonds authorizing staff to proceed with preparations shall be presented for the consideration of the City Council when the capital budget is presented or as soon thereafter as reasonably possible. All bonds issued for the purpose of supplying new monies as needed for current, ongoing public improvements shall be sold at a public, competitive sale based upon sealed bids pursuant to terms and conditions specified in the City's Home Rule Charter which requires the publication of a proper notice of sale in a national publication which regularly includes municipal bond sale notices, stating pertinent facts relating to the proposed sale including, but not limited to, the time, the date and the place (which shall be in the City of Denton) that all sealed bids will be publicly opened, read and tabulated before the City Council. The date advertised for opening of the bids shall be not less than 30 days from tLe date of publication. When cost.-beneficial and when permitted under applicable ordinances, the City may consider the use of surety bonds, lines of credit or similar instruments to satisfy mandated debt service fund requirements on outstanding and/or proposed revenue bonds. Certificates of obligation Certificates of obligation may be issued to finance permanent improvements and land acquisition, the need for which arose between bond elections. In addition, they may also be used to finance cost overruns or to acquire equipment. In accordance with state law, a resolution authorizing publication of notice of intent to issue certificates of obligation shall be presented for the consideration of the City council no less than 30 days before the proposed issuance. The notice of intent shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the city once a week for two consecutive weeks with the first publication to be at least fifteen (15) days prior to the sale date. AAA03F19 Revised 02123!96 r p c.7 I:Pr POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (Con TITLE: DEBT SERVICE MANAGEMENT REFERENCE NUMBER: Certificates of obligation can be backed by revenues eligible to be pl.lged under state law. Some revenues are restricted as to the uses for which they may be pledged. Electric, Water, Wastewater and Solid Waste revenues may be pledged wi,:hout limit for Electric, Water, Wastewater and Solid Waste purposes, but may only be pledged up to $10,000 for non-water and wastewater purposes. I Certificates of obligation may also be backed by a tax pledge under certain circumstances as defined by law. They may also be backed by a combination tax and revenue pledge. ! Public Property Finance Contractual obligation Public property finance contractual obligations may be issued to finance the acquisition of personal property. Anticipation Notes Anticipation notes empower municipalities to issue debt without giving notice of intent. Anticipation notes may be secured and repaid by a singular pledge, but not a plural pledge, of revenue, taxes, or the proceeds of a future debt issue. Anticipation notes might be authorized by an ordinance adopted by the City Council. Anticipation notes may be used to finance projects or acquisitions that could also be financed with certificates of obligation. Anticipation notes have several restrictions which include: 1) Anticipation notes issued for general purposes must mature before the seventh anniversary of the date the attorney general approves the issue, 2) Anticipation notes may not be used to repay interfund borrowing or a borrowing that occurred up to/or more than 29-months prior to the date of issuance, 3) A governing body may not issue anticipation notes that are payable from bond proceeds unless the proposition authorizing the issuance of the bonds has already been approved by the voters. Negotiated Sale and Private Placement Bonds issued for the purpose of refunding and/or restructuring outstanding debt may appropriately be sold on a negotiated basis when maximum flexibility is required in order for the City to respond to day-to-day nuances in the marketplace, and other complications peculiar to the issuance of refunding debt. whenever the option exists to sell an issue on a negotiated basis, an analysis of the options shall be performed to aid in the deciuion-making process. In a negotiated sale, the underwriter may be selected through a requ=st for proposals (RFP) or because of a relationship established by previous debt transactions. The criteria used to select an underwriter in a negotiated sale should include the following: e Overall experience e Marketing philosophy e Capability e Previous experience as managing or co-managing partner e Financial statement AAA03F19 Revised 0213,96 i` F rApenC, NBAGE 5 POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (Con AN64)"em TITLE: DEBT SERVICE MANAGEMENT • Public finance team and resources • Breakdown of underwriter's discount When cost-beneficial, the City may privately place its debt. Since no underwriter participates in a private placement, it may result in lower cost of issuance. 7rivate placement is sometimes an option for small issues. The opportunity may be identified by the financial advisor. Bidding Parameters The notice of sale will be carefully constructed so as to ensure the best possible bid for the City, in light of existing market conditions and other prevailing factors. Parameters to be examined include: • Limits between lowest and highest coupons • Coupon requirements relative to the yield curve • Method of underwriter compensation, discount or premium coupons • Use of true interest cost (TIC) versus net interest cost (NIC) • Use of bond insurance • Deep discount bonds • Variable rate bonds • Call provisions The City shall consider refuneing debt whenever an analysis indicates the potential for present value savings of approximately 3.5F of the debt service being refunded. The City will not refund less than 5F of its outstanding debt at one time except in unusual circumstances such as when it intends to change bond covenants, or in the event the City's beat interests would be served by the restructuring of all or portions of outstanding debt. CAPITAL LEASING Capital leasing is an option for the acquisition of a piece or package of equipment. Leasing shall not be considered when funds are on hand for the acquisition unless the interest expense associated with the lease is less than the interest that can be earned by investing the funds on hand or when other factors such as budget constraints, need for reserves or vendor responsiveness override the economic consideration. Whenever a lease is arranged with a private sector entity, a tax exempt rate shall be sought. The lease agreement shall permit the City to refinance the lease at no more than reasonable cost should the City decide to do so. A lease which can be called at will is preferable to one which can merely be accelerated. Since the market for lease financings is relatively inefficient, the interest rates available at any one time may vary widely. Thereforz, the City shall consider obtaining at least three competitive proposals for any major lease financing. The net present val'ie of competitive bids shall be compared, taking into account whether payments are made in advance or in arrears, and how frequently payments are made. The purchase price of equipment shall be competitively bid as well as the financing cost. AAA03F19 Ro i_scd 02123!96 ends No, POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURB/ADMINISTRATIVB DIRECTIVE (C n f d~69'... TiTLF.: DEBT SERVICE MANAGEMENT The advice of the city's bond counsel and financial advisor shall be sought in any leasing arrangement and when federal tax forms 8038 are prepared to ensure that all federal tax laws are considered and complied with. The City may consider issuing certificates of participation to finance a very large project. Care should be taken because financing costs may be greater than for other types of financing. When possible, the lease agreement will be backed with a tax pledge. If the City is obligated to make payments more than a year in the future then the agreement will probably be considered debt by the state. However, if the payments are subject to annual appropriation by the City Council, then they may not. From time to time other types of financing may become available. Examples of these options are debt pools with other entities and low-interest loans from state agencies such as the Texas Water Development Board. At the direction of the Director of Fiscal Operations, the Treasury staff member(s) will prepare a written analysis of options. The analysis will include consideration of the advice of the City's bond counsel and financial advisor and be presented to debt management committee. RATIOS The Electric, Water, Wastewater and Solid Waste Funds total long-term debt outstanding shall not exceed the amount of combined fund equity. The City has both revenue bonds and other indebtedness of the Electric, Water, Wastewater and Solid Waste Funds. The City will endeavor to maintain two coverage ratios: 1.25 for revenue bonds; "technical coverage" and 1.25 for all indebtedness; "practical coverage." OFFICIAL STATEMENT The preparation of the Official Statement is the responsibility of the financial advisor in concert with the Director of Fiscal operations under the supervision of the Executive 14 Director of Finance. Information for the Official Statement is gathered from departments/divisions throughout the City. The City will take all appropriate steps to comply with the federal disclosure rules (i.e., Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 1502-12). The City will provide annual and event disclosure to information repositories throughout the term of securities for the benefit of the primary and secondary municipal markets. Full disclosure of the operations will be made to the bond rating agencies. The City staff, with the assistance of the financial advisors and bond counsel, will prepare the necessary materials for and presentation to the rating agencies. The City shall maintain a line of communication with the rating agencies (Moody's and and ThenComprehe sive sAnn them of major Budget nandlCaevents in the pital Improvement a Plan they ube distributed to the rating agencies after they have been accepted/adopted by the City Council. The rating agencies will also be notified either by telephone or through written correspondence when the City begins preparation for a debt issuance. After the initial contact, a formal ratings application will be prepared and sent along with the draft of the Official Statement relating to the bond sale to the rating agencies. This application and related documentation should be sent several weeks prior to the bond sale to give the rating agencies sufficient time to perform their review. AkA03F19 Revised ON2 3/ 96 I it POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE (font u~ Cd~f")s ^ V~ `a N, t;em se TITLE: DEBT SERVICE MANAGEMENT s A personal meeting with representatives of the rating agencies will be scheduled when a major capital improvement program is initiated, or to discuss material economical and/or financial developments which might impact credit ratings. CREDIT ENHANCEMENTS Credit enhancements are mechanisms which guarantee principal and interest payments. They include bond insurance and a line or letter of credit. A credit enhancement, while costly, will usually bring a lower interest rate on debt and a higher rating from the rating agencies, thus lowering overall costs. Cost effectiveness of credit enhancement will be evaluated for each debt issue. ARBITRAGE LIABILITY MANAGEMENT It is the City's policy to minimize the cost of arbitrage rebate and yield restriction compliance %hile strictly complying with the federal arbitrage laws. General Federal arbitrage legislation is intended to discourage entities from issuing tax-exempt obligations unnecessarily. In compliance with the spirit of this legislation, the City will not issue obligations except for identifiable projects with very goad prospects of timely initiation. Obligations will be issued as closely in time as feasible to the time contracts are expected to be awarded so that they will be spent quickly. Responsibility Because of the complexity of the arbitrage regulations and the severity of the penalties for noncompliance, the advice of bond counsel and other qualified experts will be sought whenever questions about arbitrage rebate regulations arise. The Director of Fiscal operations will maintain a system for tracking the arbitrage rebate liability and ensuring that required calculations are performed on a timely basis. They will either perform internal calculations or engage an expert to perform arbitrage rebate calculations at least annually. Funds should be set aside for any potential liability so that sufficient amounts will be available to pay any required rebate amount. The expenditures of obligation proceeds will be tracked in the financial accounting system by issue. Investments may be pooled for financial accounting and investment purposes. When bond proceeds are commingled with other investments, the City shall adhere to the Internal Revenue Ser-tice regulations regarding the accounting and allocation of the commingled funds. Exceptions to the Rebate Requirement The arbitrage regulations provide several exceptions that will exempt interest earnings on a bond issue from the rebate requirement. These exceptions currently include: (1) small issuer exception, (2) six month spending exception, (3) 18-month spending exception, (4) 24-month construction spending exception, (5) investment in certain tax- exempt bonds, and (6) reimbursement of expenses paid prior to delivery of an issue. The City will coordinate with their arbitrage consultant, bond counsel and financial advisor to take advantage of these exceptions whenever they are in the beat interest of the City. AAA03F 19 Aevised 02/23196 J /ryNWa .1m DATE: February 23, 1996 CITY COUNCIL REPORT WORK SESSION TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Svehla - Acting City Manager SUBJECT: Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) Program RECOMMENDATION: The City Council requested a report on the Job Partnership Training Act (JTPA) in the City of Denton and within the City's workforce. This report includes an outline of the anticipated impact in our community recognizing that the Summer Youth program is not scheduled for funding by the federal government. Funding for the other JTPA programs (described below) are antic,pated to be significant cut. SU MA The JTPA program was enacted in 1983 as a replacement of the original CETA program. It is the purpose of the Job Training Partnership Act to establish programs to prepare youth and adults facing serious barriers to employment. It assists them in participating in the labor force by providing job training and other services that will result in increased employment. The community benefits with increased employment, earnings, educational and occupational skills and welfare dependency is decreased. The overall quality of the work force is improved and the productivity and competitiveness of the community is enhanced. The JTPA programs available in Denton are: 1. Title IIA - Disadvantaged Adults - this program assists eligible adults, age 22 and older, in a year-round program in assessin3 and identifying barriers to their employment and provides JTPA program options to overcome these barriers. 2. Title IIB - Summer Youth - this program is for eligible youth ages 14 - 21. JTPA staff recruits work sites, provides orientation to supervisors, recruits and certifies eligible youth, assigns youth to work sites, and provides extensive orientation to youth on the world of work. The program staff then monitor the participants' progress on the work site and provides minimum wage salary on a maximum 40 hour work wee'i. The length of the program is determined by available funds, and the program is available only during the period of the summer when the youth are not scheduled for required public school attendance. THIS PROGRAM IS NOT FUNDED FOR 1996. Agenda No. Agenda ftem Data ~_.7 ~l February 23, 1996 CM Report to City Council - JTPA Program Page 2 3. Title IIC - Disadvantaged Youth - this program assists eligible youth ages 16 - 21, in a year-round program in assessing and identifying barriers to their employment. The I~ participants are provided JTPA program options to overcome these barriers. 4. Title III - Dislocated Workers - this program assists eligible individuals, age 16 and older, who have bsen terminated from their job through no fault of their own. The typical situation is due to an employer's facility closing or as a result of a substantial layoff. This is a year-round program in assessing and identifying barriers to employment and provides JTPA program options to overcome these barriers. All Title II and III programs have specific eligibility criteria shown in Attachment I. Generally, an eligible individual is economically disadvantaged but may also qualify because of being a welfare recipient, having a disability that restricts work, etc. The Private Industry Council (PIC) oversees the administration of these programs in a 14 county service delivery area (SDA), and has designated the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) (excluding Dallas and Tarrant counties) as the administrative entity. Denton's programs are implemented by the North Texas Education and Training Co-op, Inc. (NTETC) under contract with the Council of Governments and approved by the Private Industry Council. Mr. Lloyd Webb is the Executive Director of NTETC. In the 1995 program, the employers in the community as a whole placed approximately 94 students with 23 different sponsoring employers. These placements represented an estimated dollar value of approximately $133,980. And, as shown below, the program only ran for 10 weeks versus a usual 14 weeks. Attachment II is a report provided by Mr. Webb on the Summer Youth program for 1993 - 1995. This report provides an overview of the program's goal, benefits, eligibility, how employability is enhanced, and the financial impact. The City of Denton (local government) has continued to play a key role in sponsoring youth in this program and has been a major work site and provider. i X2 z Al" No f~z 1_ 9 Agenda 111m February 23, 1996 CM Report to City Council - JTPA Program Page 3 Over the past three years, the City of Denton has benefited from the JTPA program as follows: Year Approximate Estimated (Summer) Number of Cost* Students 1995** 40 $ 90,480 1994 50 147,100 1993 31 91,202 Based on $4.25/hr @ 40 hrs/wk plus a $562/student administrative costs Program funding delayed 2 weeks at start and ended 2 weeks early at end. Attachment in shows the placements in departments and divisions within the City of Denton. The City of Denton has also employed a number of students on a part-time basis under the IIC - Disadvantaged Youth section of the JTPA These employees (temporary) are paid by JTPA, but have provided essential work like answering telephones, filing, copying, and other important clerical functions. Without funding for these positions, some departments have been unable to keep filing up to date or other work has fallen behind because regular employees have had to accomplish these essential duties. But, beyond the numbers and dollars that we, as a community and city, benefit, what are benefits to students? Every student that participates in this program is "at risk". That means they can only participate if they meet the eligibility criteria. Almost always, the students come from a low income family. They may come from single parer households. Thus, this program provides an opportunity for the student to begin the process of "breaking out" of their economically disadvantaged status. Without the JTPA involvement, most of these students would not be supervised during the summer months. They, thus, may fall into patterns of adverse behavior or, they may he exposed to adverse behaviors. Involvement in JTPA helps them learn to appreciate the expectations of a work atmosphere - interviewing for a job, coming to work (regularly and on time), learning to file, developing telephone skills, learning copying work, etc. They are able to complete work assignments and develop the knowledge and skills S V , Agend+ No. AQends lum ore .4 -,g:: February 23, 1996 CM Report to City Council - JTPA Program Page 4 needed to perform many different types of work. These are some of the benefits for a student assigned in an office environment. Others may be assigned in outdoor work activities, such as the parks, streets, or other labor positions. In these work situations, there are similar learnings (regular, on-time ' attendance, etc.) but the student learns and develop other, equally important skills (small engine maintenance, litter control, housekeeping, working with children, etc.) In addition, the students learn responsibility, customer service skills, and social norms outside the school environment. Some students have obtained employment with the agency after they participated in the JTPA program. What are benefits to employers? Of course we, as an employer, gain free labor to work on special projects or to catch up on work or projects that may be behind. Some departments have relied on the JTPA program to accomplish essential work functions. But, importantly, there is an opportunity to help our community for the long-term. An employer who participates in the JTPA program is helping to develop our leaders of tomorrow! PROGRAM. DEPARTMENTS OO GROUPS AFFECTED: Students in the JTPA program have been placed in most City departments. Some departments have used JTPA's year-round to staff filing operations, assist with telephone and receptionist duties, and other essential day-to-day operations. FISCAL IMPACT: The estimated costs of the JTPA program have been shown above. It is important to note that some City departments will go without staff to cover important functions if this program is not funded or provisions made to restore the staffing provided by the void created by non-government funding. For the City of Denton to replace these positions with regular full-time or part-time employees is estimated to cost us $136,615 for the 1995/96 Budget year. SOCIAL IMPACT ANR CONCERN WITHIN THE COMMUNITY. The fiscal impact for the City and community has been felt in the current budget year. If funding is not forthcoming, it will have an adverse impact in next year's budget. However, an even more important consequence is the social impact within the community if the JTPA program is not continued. Youth, especially the 14 -15 year olds, will not have the opportunity to receive the work ethics and work values experiences offered through the JTPA I =1;O&2 February 239 1996 CM Report to City Council - JTPA Program Page 5 programs. Pre-employment training provides a foundation for the youth to better understand what is expected of them on the job, the reasons time and attendance is important, time and money management, how to get a job on their own, and the overall importotnt7a of work responsibilities.- it is very herd to predict whether these consequences will actually occur and at what level. But, without the JTPA programs to assist youth, there are clearly some very potential social concerns for our community. Respectfully submitted: . Ri k Sve la Acting City Manager Prepared by: 24~ N.-I Thomas w. inc Director of Human Resources App oved bettf MCKea Executive actor of Municipal Services and Economic Development crprfedi.fk prepared: t/f/!f r r i Apends no, Q Ae.; I penae Item _ s ~__.,~-yz-96 ATTACIIMENT I J 1 ed~ No. ~ ene~i~q . JOB TRAINING PARTNERSHIP Title II & III Eligibility Criteria Title II eligibility criteria: 1. certification as economically disadvantage by family size; or is documented in a target population group such as, welfare recipient, disability that restricts work; 2. a U.S. citizen, or have proper Immigration b Naturalization Service "work permit"; 3. must be a resident of county in which service is requested; 4. must have a valid Social Security card 5. if male, born after January 1, 1960, must have registered with the Selective Service. Title III eligibility includes all of the Title II criteria above except: 1. Income documentation not required; 2. applicants must document that they are unemployed due to a facility closure or a substantial layoff. A letter from the employer indicating the layoff or closure; a public announcement, such as a newspaper article, or other official documentation of the closure or layoff may be sufficient documentation to substantiate eligibility; 3. no residency requirement within the service county is required. 5 r ti. Agenda ao., - ACenQa lterq - Date zz:~ ATTACHMENT II V r Agenda Apanb Nri Summer Youth Program Goal: The goal of the Summer Youth program is to enhance employability and the school-to- work connection in youth ages 14 to 21 that are at risk and as determined by JTPA I~ eligibility. 1. Benefits Benefits of the Summer Youth Program are two fold. First, the youth benefits in several ways: * Earn money and feel like they are contributing to the workplace effort, society, family and most of all themselves. * Gain work experience for the future * Learn about different occupations and explore those in which they are interested * Gain knowledge from their supervisor/mentor regarding work ethic, proper behavior and job skills * Understand the benefits of remaining in school and develop long range goals. * Build self-esteem and sense of responsibility Second, the job site and community benefits in several ways: * Free labor * Opportunity to impact a youth as a mentor and a teacher * Youth become productive part of society now and influence the productivity in the future. H. Eligibility JTPA eligibility is very complex and cannot be summarized in one paragraph. However, basic eligibility is based upon income level and family size for the previous 6 months from application date. Some indicators of qualification are: Food Stamp or AFDC recipient Disability Status Receiving SSI Foster Child 111. Enhance Employability A. SCANS Skills These skills were developed by the Secretaries Commission o'Achieving Necessary Skills. These are basic skills that all employers want entry level employees to have. See Attachment Agenda fJO. ~m Agenda Item B. Pre-Employment Data 1P This is a twenty (20) hour class that all students go through before they are eligible to work for the program and includes basicjob readiness skills. This curriculum includes: Introduction to SCANS Work Values and Ethics Job Seeking Applications Resume Interviews Self-Esteem Cultural Diversity Sexual Harassment Decision Making Time Management Money Management C. Job Site Placement After students have completed Pre-Employment they are eligible to pick a job site that corresponds with their interests. The student makes the choice and the commitment to the job site based on the job description pages that job sites have turned in previously. The students earn $4,25 per hour and can work a maximum of 40 hours per week. The students are also covered under Worker's Compensation Insurance which is part of the Participant Cost paid by tha program. D. Job Specific Skills Certificates (JSS) Students also have the option of receiving a 1SS that correspond; to their job title. These certificates are issued by the Department of Commerce and can he used as part of a portfolio when seeking employment. After 30 hours the student become eligible to receive a certificate and must receive an evaluation of 80% or better on the skills required. Each certificate has different skills as required by industry and job descriptions. E. Tools In preparation of future employment, our staff assisted students in creating both a functional and chronological resumes. Portfolios were also established for the students including these tools and any recommendations that the job site supervisors %NTOte for the student. See attached portfolio. IV. Program and Financial Impact A. Youth Served The city of Denton, meaning all those that worked within the city, limits, provided placements for 94 youth in 1995. This number was down from previous years due to the decrease in federal funding. The city of Denton provided placements for 160 youth in 1994. a r~ Figures from the 1993 year was not available; however based on perce in the city of Denton would be 146. B. Costs The estimated costs for the program operated in the city of Denton during the past three years are: Program Year Participant Cost Operational Cost Total 1995 $88,810 $45,170 $133,980 1994 $185,815 $43,872 $229,687 1993 $179,600 $56,580 $236,180 s t t SCANS INVENTORY MQa Fla, QD EAVA13 SCANS FOUNDATION SKILLS Basic Skills Reading • Writing • Arithmetic • Mathematics • Listening • Speaking Thinking Skills Creative Thinking • Decision Making • Problem Solving • Seeing Things in the Mint's Eye • Knowing How to Learn • Reasoning Personal Qualities Responsbility • Self•Esieem • Social • Self-Management • Integrhy/Honesty CONNECTWO SCANS TO THE REAL WORLD April 18-19, *95--Aus1in, 'texas I-18 r SCANS INVENTORY Aaende No. ~O ~ O© Agenda rtes S SCANS ComPETENGES Resources Allocates Time l Allocates Money ` Allocates Material and Facility Resources • Allocates Human Resources Information Acquires and Evaluates Information • Organizes and Maintains Information • Interprets and Communicates Information • Uses Computers to Process Information Interpersonal Participates as a Member of a Team • Teaches Others • Serves Clients/Customers • Exercises Leadership • Negotiates to Arrive at a Decision • Works with Cultural Diversity Systems Understands Systems • Monitors and Corrects Performance • Improves and Designs Systems Technology Selects Technology • Applies Technology to Task • Maintains and Troubteshools Technology CONNECTING SCANS TOME REAL WORLD April 18-19, 1995-Austin, Texas 1.17 SCANS INVENTORY ~panCa No. DEF1iV1TMVS OF THE SCANS FOUNDATI iy§KILLS" -'S -Z7-- BASIC SKILLS Reading. Locates, understands, and interprets written information in prose and documents-including manuals, graphs, and schedules--to perform tasks; learns from text by determining the main idea or essential message: identifies relevant details, facts, and specifications; inlers or locates the meaning of unknown or technical vocabulary, and judges the accuracy, appropriateness, style, and plausibility of reports, proposals, or theories of other writers. Writing. Communicates thoughts, Ideas, information, and messages in writing; records information completely and accurately; composes and creates documen s such as letters, directions, manuals, reports, proposals, graphs, flow charts; uses language, style, organization, and format appropriate to the subject matter, purpose, and audience. Includes supporting documentation and attends to level of detail; checks, edits, and revises for correct information, appropriate emphasis, form, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Arithmetic. Performs basic computations; uses basic numerical concepts such as whole numbers and percentages in practical situations; makes reasonable estimates of arithmetic results without a calculator, and uses tables, graphs, diagrams, and charts to obtain orco,nvey quantitative inlormation. Mathematics. Approaches practical problems by choosing appropriately from a variety of mathematical techniques; uses quantitative data to construct logical explanations for real world situations; expresses mathematical ideas and concepts orally and in writing; and understands the role of chance in the occurrence and predict ion of events. Listening. Receives, attends to, interprets, and responds to verbal messages and other cues such as body language in ways that are appropriate to the purpose; for example, to comprehend; to learn; to critically evaluate; to appreciate; or to support the speaker. Speaking. Organizes ideas and communicates oral messages appropriate to listeners and situations; participates in conversation, discussion, and group presentations; selects an appropriate medium for conveying a message: uses verbal language and other cues such as body language appropriate in style, tone, and level of complexity to the audience and the occasion; speaks clearly and communicates a message; understands and responds to listener feedback; and asks questions when needed. t CONNEC77NG_ SCANS TO THE REAL WORLD April 18-19, 1995-Austin, Texas I~21 Y t SCANS INVENTORY Agenda No. ~Q Agendaltem THINKING SKILLS Data_ _ Creative Thinking. Uses imagination freely, combines ideas or information in new ways, ma es between seemingly unrelated ideas, and reshapes goals in ways that reveal new possibilities. Decision Making. Specifies goals and constraints, generates alternatives, considers risks, and evaluates and chooses best alternatives. Problem Solving. Recognizes that a problem exists (i.e., there is a discrepancy between what is and what should or could be), identifies possible reasons for the discrepancy, and devises ant implements a plan of action to resolve rt. Evaluates and monitors progress, and revises plan as indicated by findings. Seeing Things In Mind's Eye. Organizes ant processra symbols, pictures, graphs, objects, or other information: for example, sees a building from a blueprint, a system's operation from schematics, the flow of work activities from narrative descriptions, or the taste of food from reading a recipe. Knowing Now to Learn. Recognizes and can use learning techniques to apply and adapt new knowledge and skills in both familiar and changing situations. Involves being aware of learning tools such as personal learning styles (visual, aural, etc.), formal learning strategies (note taking or clustering items that share some characteristics), and informal learning strategies (awareness of unidentified false assumptions that may lead to faulty conclusions). Reasoning. Discovers a rule or principle underlying the relationship between two or more objects and applies it in solving a problem. For example, uses logic to draw conclusions from available information, extracts rules or principles from a set of objects or written text; applies rules and principles to a new situation, or determines which conclusions are correct when given a set of facts and a set of conclusions. CONNECTING SCANS TO THE REAL WORLC April 18-19, 1995--Austin, Texas 1.22 I A?enda erg, a7anda Item TL, PERSONAL QUALITIES Data _ Responslbfflty. Exerts a high level of effort and perseverance towards goal attainment. Works hard to become dspl ying a high le ell of contasks centrationeeven wlhens assigned anaunpfeasant task D sp alys high standards of attendance, punctuality, enthusiasm, vitality, and optimism in approaching and completing tasks. Self-Esteem. Believes in own self-worth and maintains a own skills and abilities; Is aware of impact on others; and knows ownfemotional apacitytand needs aunt how to address them. Sociability. Demonstrates understanding, friendliness, adaptability, empathy, and politeness In new and on- going group settings: Asserts self in familiar and unfamiliar social situations; relates well to other, responds appropriately as the situation requires; and takes an interest in what others say and do. Self-Management. Assesses own knowledge, skiffs, and abilities accurately; sets welt-defined and realistic personal goals; monilors progress toward goal attainment and motivates self through goal achievement; exhibits self-control and responds to feedback unemotionally and non-defensively, Is a 'sett-starter,' lntegrity/Honesty. Can be trusted. Recognizes when faced with making a decision or exhibPing behavior that may break with commonly held personal or societal values; understands the Impact of viofating these beliefs and codes on an organi2ation, self, and others; and chooses an ethical course of action. CONNEC17NO SCANS TO 7NE REAL WORLD April 18-19, 1995--Austin, Texas I-23 J Agenda No. DEFINITIONS OF THE SCANS COAVPET var ttm < RESOURCES Allocates Time. Selects relevant, goal-related activities, ranks them in order of importance, allocates time to activities, and understands, prepares, and follows schedules. Allocates Money. Uses or prepares budgets, including making cost and rev.,nue forecasts, keeps detailed records to track budget performance, ant makes appropriate adjustments. Allocates Material end Faclllty Resources. Acquires, stores, and distributes materials, supplies, parts, equipment, space, or final products in order to make the best use of them. Allocates Human Resources. Assesses knowledge and skills and distributes work accordingly, evaluates performance, and provides feedback. INTERPERSONAL Participates as a Member of a Team. Works cooperatively with others and contributes to group with ideas, suggestions, and effort. Teaches Others. Hetps others to learn. Serves Clients/Customers. Works and communicates with clients and customers to satisfy their expectations. Exercises Leadership. Communicates thoughts, feelings, and ideas to justify a position, encourages, persuades, convinces, or otherwise motivates an individuat or groups, including responsibly challenging existing procedures, policies, or authority. Negotiates. Works towards an agreement that may involve exchanging specific resources or resolving divergent interests. Works with Cultural Dlverslty. Works well with men and women and with a variety of ethnic, social, or educational backgrounds. INFORMATION Acquires and Evaluates Information. Identifies need for data, obtains ft from existing sources or creates ft, and evaluates its relevance and accuracy. Organizes and Maintains Information, Organizes, processes, and maintains written or computerized reports and other forms of information in a systematic fashion. Interprets and Communicates Information. Selects and analyzes information and communicates the results to others using oral, written, graphic, pictorial, or mufti-media methods. Uses Computers to Process Information. Employs computers to acquire, organize, analyze, and communicate inform Trion. CONNECTING SCANS TO THE REAL WORLD April 18-19, 1995--Austln, Texas I-19 z i Apendd t:o. ~ ~9 A~.,Cp Itzn~. DaIJ=<a2;~ Sf'STEbIS Understands Systems. Knows tow social, organizational, and technological systems work and operates effectively within them. Monitors and Corrects Performance. Distinguishes trends, predicts impact of actions on system operations, diagnoses deviations in the function of a systerNorganizabon, and takes necessary action to correct performance. Improves and Designs Systems. Makes suggestions to modify existing systems to improve products or services, and develops new or attemative systems. TECHNOLOGY Selects Technology. Judges which set of procedures, tools, or machines, including computers and their programs, will produce the desired results. Applies Technology to Task. Understands the overall intent and the proper procedures for setting up and operating machines, including computers and their programming systems. Maintains am Troubleshoots Technology. Prevents, identifies, or solves problems in machines, computers, and other techno"ies. I CONNECTING SCANS TO THE REAL WORLD Aprli 18-19, 1995--Austin, Texas 1-20 i . ~r r Acenda Na ~C ADE+kfq hem Q~h .r 1995 JTPA Program Denton County Participants ORGANIZATION/COMPANY WORKSITE JOB DESCRIPTION Assoc. Retarded Assoc. Retarded Activity Aide Citizens Citizens Camp Fire Camp Fire Clerical Denton County Personnel Clerical Denton Cnty. Purchasing Receptionist Purchasing Fairhaven Fairhaven R.H. Maintenance Fairhaven Fairhaven R.H. Clerical Denton I.S.D. West Maintenance Denton I.S.D. West Clerical Menton Z.S.D. Ryan Receptionist Denton T.S.D. Ryan-Spec.Ed. Teacher Aide Denton I.S.D. Ryan Custodial Denton I.S.D. Strickland Clerical Denton City-Cnty Day Nursery Kitchen Aide Nursery Denton City-Cnty Day Nursery Nursery Classroom Aide Fred Moore L.C. Fred Moore Maintenance Fred Moore Day Care Fred Moore Teacher's Aide Friends of Family Friends of. Family Clerical Good Samaritan Activities Asst. Instr. Good Samaritan Nursing Clerical Good Samaritan Office Clerical Good Samaritan Housekeeping/Laundry Housekeeping Good Samaritan Maintenance Maintenance Good Samaritan Food Service Kitchen Helper Good Will Floor Floor person Heritage Oak Maintenance Denton Co. Rec. Records Mgmt. Clerical Mgmt. APPOOA9B 1 a 5 F ORGANIZATION/COMPANY WORKSITE JOS DESCRIPTION District Clerk Denton County clerical Denton Co. Clerk Ofc. Clerical Denton Co. Auditors Clerical Denton St. School Outreach Clerical Denton St. School Recreation Rec. Asst. Denton St. School Housekeeping Maintenance Denton St. School Supply Maintenance Denton St. School Benefits/Payroll/Ins Clerical Denton St. School Personnel Clerical Denton St. School Habilitation Clerical Therapies Denton St. School Infirmary Mgr. Clerical Denton St. School Medical Svc. Office Clerical Denton St. School Case Mgmt. Clerical Denton St. School Apt. SOSA Training Asst. Denton St. School THS11C Training Asst. Denton St. School H/R Dept. Clerical Denton St. School Nutrition Serv. clerical Denton St. School Home Repair Dept. Machine helper Social Security Ofc. Clerical TX Employment Com. Clerical Nat'l Guard Maintenance Denton Housing Auth. Maintenance American Red Cross clerical Univ. of N.T. Employment Service Clerical Univ. of N.T. TX Ctr. Educ Tech Clerical Univ. of N.T. Ofc Research Admin. Clerical Univ. of N.T. College of Music Clerical Univ. of N.T. Music Hist.& Theory Clerical Univ. of N.T. College of Music Piano Tech Asst. Univ. of N.T. Physics Dept. (Acctg Clerical Ofc.) APPOOA9B 2 i t J -~e-f EPe:Apndl ~ - 6 ATTACHM ENT III 4 I F Aw" Aa lc - O 1995 p110 JTPA Program City of Denton Participation WORKSITE JOB DESCRIPTION Building Inspections Clerical Central Store Clerical City Secretary Ofc. Clerical Denia Rec. Bldg Attend. Elec. Prod Maintenance Elec. Substation Maintenance Engineering Clerical Environmental Health Clerical Animal Control Asst. Attend Fleet Svc. Clerical Fleet Svc. Garage Maintenance Machine Shop Maintenance Community Service Dept. Clerk Landfill Labor Legal Clerical Municipal Court Clerical MLK Rec Center Custodian MLK Rec Center Asst. Bldg Attend MLK Rec Center Clerical MLK Rec Center Asst. Playground North Lakes Clerical Parks Clerical Parks Maintenance Maintenance Personnel clerical Planning Clerical APPOOA9B 1 1. t l 00 Acende NoA AW da l4CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager DATE: February 15, 1996 SUBJECT: Development Policy Committee Appointments RECOMMENDATION: N/A SUMMARY: Council would appoint an advisory committee and charge it to complete a major update of the Denton Development by resolution, attachment 1. The council could consider attachment 1 at a regular meeting after it has made its committee nominations. Entities have made their nominations, see attachment 2. Council has nine nominations/appointments, two (2) from the council and seven (7) neighborhood representatives. At this writing, staff is aware of six (6) names submitted to Council for appointment as neighborhood representatives. None of those live in northeast Denton. BACKGROUND: September 13, 1995: P&Z makes recommendations concerning advisory committee and program for a major update of the Denton Development Plan. October 17, 1995: Council approves update program. November 14, 1995: Council approves appointment system and type of committee member, attachment 3. January 2, 1996: Council increases from 4 to 7 neighborhood representation and calls for nominations direct to council, a i City Council Report Page 2 ~QenQa Na r C Agenda ]ten Date J January 10, 1996: P&Z selects its nominees. December 12, 1995 and January 29, 1996: Briefing to neighborhood interests about program and nomination process. February 15, 1995: Briefing to Chamber of Commerce about program and nomination process. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: All of Denton. FISCAL IMPACT: Update of the Plan is estimated to cost $82,610. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: - 14 . "'Id - Prepared by: Rick v 1a, ding City Manager L-i / , Frank . Robbins, A1CP Director of Planning and Development Attachments: 1. Draft resolution. 2. Entity nomination. 3. Appointment System. AY-XOOA06 S v q i J:\WPD0C5\RGS\DEVELP0L.RES Apanda I:an ATTACHMENT 1 Dat` RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON ESTABLISHING A DEVELOPMENT POLICY COMMITTEE T'J MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING THE UPDATE OF THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN; APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THAT COMMITTEE; APPOINTING A CHAIRPERSON OF THE COMMITTEE; SETTING FORTH THE DUTIES AND TERM OF THE COMMITTEE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, WHEREAS, the Denton Development Plan calls for major updates every five to ten years; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended that a major update program be undertaken; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the major update program on October 18, 1995, as shown in Exhibit I; and WHEREAS, the Council wishes to appoint a Development Policy Committee (the "Committee") to review and make recommendations concerning development policy and appoint a chair for such committee in accordance with the approved update program; NOW, THEREFORE; THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION I. Appointment. The following persons and chair are appointed to the Development Policy Committee: Chair c t A2vd31l0. dQ"~ SECTION II. Responsibilities. The Committee shall study development policy and make recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council in accordance with the program in Exhibit I. SECTION III. Term. Each member shall be appointed by the City Council for a period not to exceed two years or when the City Council considers the Committee's final recommendations, whichever occurs first. SECTION IV. Procedures. The Committee may adopt rules for the conduct of its meetings. U,CT ON V. Staffing. The Director of Planning and Development is designated the staff liaison to the Committee. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1996. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: HERBERT L. PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY 1 ) BY., PAGE 2 a 77, 7 777-1 Agenda 1;0. _ A;CnC~ Iten EXHIBIT 1 DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAT UPDATE PROGRAM 1. Conduct a major update. 2, Council appoints a development committee that would recommend to P&Z, who would recommend to Council amendments to the Denton Development Plan (DDP). 3. The committee may form subcommittees and allow participation by persons not appointed to the committee on the subcommittees. Subcommittees chairs appointed by committee. 4. Example schedule; • Committee orientation and staff No later than one month after data gathering: fonnation of the committee. • Committee begins exploring major No later than two months after issues, considers forming formation of the committee. subcommittees, and develops a sector planning process and schedule: • Remaining time: 1 year or longer. 5. Committee and subcommittee meeting times to be determined by the committee and subcommittees. 6. The committee may recommend amendment of any part of the Denton Development Plan at any time rather than recommendation of the whole plan at once. 7. The Committee may recommend ordinance amendments at any time. 8. The Concept Map should be reviewed and amended through sector planning. 9. Major issues for initial exploration by the Committee. a. Review the Concept Map, Refine intensity area boundaries and Appendix A study area boundaries. • Complete this detailed planning project by neighborhood or sector planning. • Adopt a goal that the Concept Map, the zoning map, and actual land use should be the same. s c i Apenea Mo. - • Deal with existing zoning which is inconsistent wit (iirent-o designation, b. Revise the Thoroughfare Plan. Add the collector street system. c. Expand the planning area to the ETJ. d. Consider adding water, wastewater, parks, drainage, and school master plans. e. Conduct studies about and consider increasing intensity along I-35 and Loop 288, while improving the community's attractiveness and brand image along major entranceway corridors. f. Refine policy statements, for instance: 1) No more than 113 of moderate activity area can be commercial or retail. 2) No more than three corners of a moderate node may be commercial or retail. 3) Site plan policy that may require PD zoning in most zoning to nonresidential use. 4) Refine 112 mile separation policy adding, "on the same side of a street." 5) Multifamily policy, the current policy defines multifamily at 12 units per acre or greater. g. The Committee should consider shortening the Plan's volume by de,eting land use projection data and consolidation of policy statements, for instance. h. Include analysis of the Vision Project's strategies. AXX009EA i. FEE-2e-1996 16:5? CITY OF DENTON PLANNING P•e2ie2 perstis)tor ~ _ Attachment 2 ~Etb9xn :L DEVELOPMENT POLICY COMMIT MEMBER TITLE NOMINATED BY NAME(S) P&Z Member P&Z Mike Cochran Bob Powell Busincas Black Chamber Curtis Himes Representative Business Hispanic Chamber Roger Rameriz Representative Business Denton Chamber Dick Smith Representative Real Estate Greater Denton Rob Rayner Professional Board of Realtors Development Greater Denton Teri Schcrtz Professional Homebuilders DISD DISD Gilbert Bernstein TWU TWU Chuck Hanley UNT UNT Larry Luce Local Chapter of Professional American Institute Gary Juren Architect of Architects Local Chapter of Professional Texas Society of Brian Burke Engineer Professional Engineers (immediate past) Professional Director of local Charldean Newell Planner chapter of American Planning Assoc. COUNCIL NObILNATIONS/APPOINTMENTS 2 Council members 7 Neighborhood representatives Chairperson a 4 } 4 . i ATTACHMENT 3 SUOOESTED MARE-UP Of DEVELOPMENT POLICY C r , 2 members of Planning and Zoning Commission, selected by P ; Z 2 members of City Council, selected by Council 3 Business representative, selected by Chamber of Commerce 1 real estate professional, selected by Realtors Assoc. 1 development professional, selected by appropriate professional association 1 representative of DISD, selected by DISD Board 1 representative of TWU, selected by Twu i representative of UNT, selected by UNT 4 representatives of city's geographic areas (1 from each Council District), chosen by neighborhood associations 3 members appointed by the Council, with suggestions from staff and/or respective professional associations, from the following (or related) professions: architect professional planner (not staff member) professional engineer Chairperson, to be appointed by Co,jncil ~ 'f-oTkL 4 • ~`Ilw''~ AV. S tt(rra~ r"w 0 ~ww - CERTIFICATE FOR ORDINANCE THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON CITY OF DENTON We, the undersigned officers of said City, hereby certify as follows: 1. The City Council of said City convened iu SPECIAL MEETING ON THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1996, at the City Hall, and the roll was called of the duly constituted officers and members of said City Council, to At Bob Castleberry, Mayor Jeff Krueger David Biles Jack Killer Euline Brock Carl G. Young, Sr. Jerry Cott Jennifer Walters, City Secretary and all of said persons were present, except the following absentees: thus constituting a quorum. Whereupoq among other business, the following was transacted at said Meeting: a written AN ORDNANCE CANVASSING ELECTION RETURNS OF THE BOND ELECTION HELD ON FEBRUARY 24, 1996 AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE was duly introduced for the consideration of said City Council and read in full. It was then duly moved and seconded that said Ordinance be passed; and, after due discussion, said motion carrying with it the passage of said Ordinance, prevailed and carried by the following vote: AYES: All members of said City Council shown present above voted "Aye." NOES: 2. That a true, full and correct copy of the aforesaid Ordinance passed at the Meeting described in the above and foregoing paragraph is attached to and follows this Certificate; that said Ordinance has been duly recorded in said City Council's minutes of said Meeting; that the above and foregoing paragraph is a true, full and correct excerpt from said City Council's minutes of said Meeting pertaining to the passage of said Ordinance; that the persons named in the above and fore- going paragraph are the duly chosen, qualified and acting ofr.,-ers and members of said City Council as indicated therein; that each of the officers and members of said City Council was duly and sufficiently notified officially and personally, in advance, of the time, place and purpose of the aforesaid Meeting, and that said Ordinance would be introduced and considered for passage at said S Q r. b A01nda }:0. L r,~arta L',n _s.~ Meeting, and each of said officers and members consented, in advance, ee mg for such purpose, and that said Meeting was open to the public and public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given, all as required by the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. 3. That the Mayor of said City has approved and hereby approves the aforesaid Ordinance; that the Mayor and the City Secretary of said City have duty signed said Ordinance; and that the Mayor and the City Secretary of said City hereby declare that their signing of this Certificate shall constitute the signing of the attached and following copy of said Ordinance for all purposes. SIGNED AND SEALED the 27th day of February, 1996. City Secretary Mayor (SEAL) a0enda No..~ AN ORDINANCE CANVASSING ELECTION RETUR OF THE BOND ELECTION HELD ON FEBRUARY 24, 996 AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE d~~ THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON CITY OF DENTON WHEREAS, the City Council of said City ordered an election to be held in said City on February 24, 1996 on the PROPOSITIONS hereinafter stated; and WHEREAS, said City Council has investigated all matters pertaining to said election, including the ordering, giving notice, officers, holding and making retutas of said election; and WHEREAS, the election officers who held said election have duly made the returns of the result thereof, and said returns have been duly delivered to said City Council. WHEREAS, it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance was passed was open to the public, and public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given, all as required by the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: Section I. That the City Council officially finds and determines that said election was duly ordered, that proper notice of said election was duly given, that proper election officers were duly appointed prior to said election, that said election was duly held, that due returns of the result of said election have been made and delivered, and that the City Council has duly canvassed said returns, all in accordance with law and the Ordinance calling said election. Section 11, That the City Council officially finds and determines that the following votes were cast at said election on the submitted PROPOSITIONS by the resident, qualified electors of said City, who voted at the election: PROPOSITION NO. I VOTES: FOR THE ISSUANCE OF $11,112,000 OF STREET AND TRAFFIC CONTROL IMPROVEMENT BONDS VOTES: AGAINST I 5 t F Agenda No. PROPOSITION NO, 2 Dxa Ga VOTES: FOR THE ISSUANCE OF $7,238,000 OF DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT BONDS VOTES: AGAINST PROPOSITION NO. 3 VOTES: FOR THE ISSUANCE OF $7,650,000 OF PARK IMPROVEMENT BONDS VOTES: AGAINST Section M. That the City Council officially finds, determines and declares the result of said election to be that the PROPOSITIONS so submitted have received a favorable majority vote in all respects and have carried, Section IV. That the aforesaid bonds may be issued, as voted and as provided by law. Section V. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 27th day of February, 1996. Bob Castleberry, Mayor ATTEST: i Jennifer Walters, City Secretary By: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: Herbert L. Prouty, City Attorney By: s 0 s Agenda I item S DIVERSITY TASK FORCE APPOEVT'MENT Kruger: Willie Hudspeth Young: Kenneth Davis Robert Green Biles: Tony Soto Lindsey Keffer Cott: Ray Cornay Byron Woods Brock: Kent Miller Dr. John Price Miller: Rosemary Rodriguez Dennis Stephens Castleberry: Alice Alexander Derrell Bulls Svehla: Tonya Williams Lee Ann Bunselmeyer Joanie Housewright Ed Hodney AAA04M